Commit
·
187544d
1
Parent(s):
56ddf82
Update d-adaptation/notes.md
Browse files- d-adaptation/notes.md +5 -1
d-adaptation/notes.md
CHANGED
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ Lower dims show good performance. Need much larger test to check for accuracy be
|
|
21 |
|
22 |
## Resolution
|
23 |
512 resolution is good so far
|
|
|
24 |
|
25 |
## Steps
|
26 |
600 to 800 steps have been the primary focus of experimentation.
|
@@ -29,4 +30,7 @@ Over 1000 has not shown much improvement.
|
|
29 |
|
30 |
## 2.X models
|
31 |
To be tested.
|
32 |
-
Candidate base models: wd1.5, replicant, subtly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
22 |
## Resolution
|
23 |
512 resolution is good so far
|
24 |
+
640 resolution is good. did 1.5x the number of steps as compared to 512 (640/512)^2 is about 1.5. Yet to conclude if this is a good rule to follow. UMP has 640 resolution sample.
|
25 |
|
26 |
## Steps
|
27 |
600 to 800 steps have been the primary focus of experimentation.
|
|
|
30 |
|
31 |
## 2.X models
|
32 |
To be tested.
|
33 |
+
Candidate base models: wd1.5, replicant, subtly
|
34 |
+
|
35 |
+
## Noise offset.
|
36 |
+
toyxyz has noted that using high noise offset (higher than 0.2 it seems) with d-adaptation creates unusable results. It starts looking better than lower learning rates but even unet 0.5, text 0.25 with noise offset of 0.75 does not look usable.
|