ans commited on
Commit
16bf77f
1 Parent(s): 86dac4a

Update README.md

Browse files
Files changed (1) hide show
  1. README.md +6 -6
README.md CHANGED
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ widget:
13
  A fine-tuned model for fact-classification task on English tweets about COVID-19/vaccine.
14
 
15
  ## Intended uses & limitations
16
- You can classify if the input tweet (or any others statement) about COVID-19/vaccine is true, false or misleading.
17
  Note that since this model was trained with data up to May 2020, the most recent information may not be reflected.
18
 
19
  #### How to use
@@ -45,14 +45,14 @@ pipe(seq)
45
  ]
46
  ```
47
 
48
- - True examples
49
  ```python
50
  "By the end of 2020, several vaccines had become available for use in different parts of the world."
51
  "Vaccines to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection are considered the most promising approach for curbing the pandemic."
52
  "RNA vaccines were the first vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 to be produced and represent an entirely new vaccine approach."
53
  ```
54
 
55
- - False examples
56
  ```python
57
  "COVID-19 vaccine caused new strain in UK."
58
  ```
@@ -82,9 +82,9 @@ To conservatively classify whether an input sequence is true or not, the model m
82
  - A fine-tuned model from pre-trained language model (1) for fact-classification task on COVID-19/vaccine.
83
  - COVID-19/vaccine-related statements were collected from [Poynter](https://www.poynter.org/ifcn-covid-19-misinformation/) and [Snopes](https://www.snopes.com/) using Selenium resulting in over 14,000 fact-checked statements from Jan 2020 to May 2021.
84
  - Original labels were divided within following three categories:
85
- - `False`: includes false, no evidence, manipulated, fake, not true, unproven, unverified
86
- - `Misleading`: includes misleading, exaggerated, out of context, needs context
87
- - `True`: includes true, correct
88
 
89
  ## Evaluation results
90
  | Training loss | Validation loss | Training accuracy | Validation accuracy |
 
13
  A fine-tuned model for fact-classification task on English tweets about COVID-19/vaccine.
14
 
15
  ## Intended uses & limitations
16
+ You can classify if the input tweet (or any others statement) about COVID-19/vaccine is `true`, `false` or `misleading`.
17
  Note that since this model was trained with data up to May 2020, the most recent information may not be reflected.
18
 
19
  #### How to use
 
45
  ]
46
  ```
47
 
48
+ - `true` examples
49
  ```python
50
  "By the end of 2020, several vaccines had become available for use in different parts of the world."
51
  "Vaccines to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection are considered the most promising approach for curbing the pandemic."
52
  "RNA vaccines were the first vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 to be produced and represent an entirely new vaccine approach."
53
  ```
54
 
55
+ - `false` examples
56
  ```python
57
  "COVID-19 vaccine caused new strain in UK."
58
  ```
 
82
  - A fine-tuned model from pre-trained language model (1) for fact-classification task on COVID-19/vaccine.
83
  - COVID-19/vaccine-related statements were collected from [Poynter](https://www.poynter.org/ifcn-covid-19-misinformation/) and [Snopes](https://www.snopes.com/) using Selenium resulting in over 14,000 fact-checked statements from Jan 2020 to May 2021.
84
  - Original labels were divided within following three categories:
85
+ - `False`: includes false, no evidence, manipulated, fake, not true, unproven and unverified
86
+ - `Misleading`: includes misleading, exaggerated, out of context and needs context
87
+ - `True`: includes true and correct
88
 
89
  ## Evaluation results
90
  | Training loss | Validation loss | Training accuracy | Validation accuracy |