Update README.md

README.md

@@ -90,6 +90,8 @@ The Scandinavian scores are the average of the Danish, Swedish and Norwegian sco
 
 We use a test split of the [DanFEVER dataset](https://aclanthology.org/2021.nodalida-main.pdf#page=439) to evaluate the Danish performance of the models.
 
+The test split is generated using [this gist](https://gist.github.com/saattrupdan/1cb8379232fdec6e943dc84595a85e7c).
+
 | **Model** | **MCC** | **Macro-F1** | **Accuracy** | **Number of Parameters** |
 | :-------- | :------------ | :--------- | :----------- | :----------- |
 | `alexandrainst/scandi-nli-large` (this) | **73.80%** | **58.41%** | **86.98%** | 354M |
@@ -139,6 +141,8 @@ We acknowledge that not evaluating on a gold standard dataset is not ideal, but
 
 It has been fine-tuned on a dataset composed of [DanFEVER](https://aclanthology.org/2021.nodalida-main.pdf#page=439) as well as machine translated versions of [MultiNLI](https://cims.nyu.edu/~sbowman/multinli/) and [CommitmentBank](https://doi.org/10.18148/sub/2019.v23i2.601) into all three languages, and machine translated versions of [FEVER](https://aclanthology.org/N18-1074/) and [Adversarial NLI](https://aclanthology.org/2020.acl-main.441/) into Swedish.
 
+The training split of DanFEVER is generated using [this gist](https://gist.github.com/saattrupdan/1cb8379232fdec6e943dc84595a85e7c).
+
 The three languages are sampled equally during training, and they're validated on validation splits of [DanFEVER](https://aclanthology.org/2021.nodalida-main.pdf#page=439) and machine translated versions of [MultiNLI](https://cims.nyu.edu/~sbowman/multinli/) for Swedish and Norwegian Bokmål, sampled equally.
 
 ### Training hyperparameters