title
stringlengths 22
99
| published
unknown | url
stringlengths 28
28
| id
stringlengths 16
31
| text
stringlengths 1
553
| start
float64 0
15.2k
| end
float64 1.68
15.2k
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1505.36 | No idea. It's like a VD like verifiable delay function thing, right? Or no? It sounds like a consensus | 1,505.36 | 1,513.12 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1513.12 | mechanism. Yeah, I have no idea. Sorry to be so anti-climactic with that one. I think what | 1,513.12 | 1,524.72 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1524.7199999999998 | this is boiled down to is are there, and this isn't an exact answer, but I think it hits the | 1,524.72 | 1,530 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1530.0 | key point. Is there a way to do post-cronome secure verifiable delay functions? No, that's a good question. | 1,530 | 1,536.88 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1539.44 | Yeah, which is not something I've thought about until literally right now. | 1,539.44 | 1,542.96 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1542.96 | So I was waiting for the answer. I think super singular, I sogening methods can do this. | 1,542.96 | 1,549.44 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1549.44 | I don't know. I think I'm going to probably make an incorrect statement here. Go for it. No, | 1,549.44 | 1,555.84 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1555.84 | I'm not going to do that. I have no idea. I had no message, but I'm not sure. | 1,555.84 | 1,564.4 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1567.12 | I think it could be done. Yeah, okay. Right. Yeah, we're just going to take us into the | 1,567.12 | 1,575.44 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1575.4399999999998 | mentee, the AMA answer with the communities coming. Yeah, I'm going to I'm going to just give me | 1,575.44 | 1,578.96 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1578.9599999999998 | one second guys. I'm just going to pull up and see if we have any other ones coming through here | 1,578.96 | 1,583.44 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1583.44 | in real time. I think I do have an answer for the QVFD. I'm going to just go on on the | 1,583.44 | 1,587.76 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1587.76 | win and just guess. I think that so if you take a group of unknown order and you're trying to | 1,587.76 | 1,595.92 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1595.92 | and you hand me a random irrelevant and you ask me what the order is. The only way I can really | 1,595.92 | 1,604.24 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1604.24 | figure that out is progressively multiplying it by itself. And that's a linear process that I don't | 1,604.24 | 1,610.56 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1610.56 | think can be exploited on the quantum level. Like I don't think you can take a fuzz version of a | 1,610.56 | 1,617.36 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1617.36 | group element and keep computing its powers. So, but when you query like an oracle, like a random | 1,617.36 | 1,625.76 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1625.76 | oracle, like a hash function, you get a little bit with a with a with a non collapsed state, | 1,625.76 | 1,631.36 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1631.36 | right? You get a whole bunch of answers back related to all of the inputs. So unlike that problem, | 1,631.36 | 1,637.92 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1637.92 | I don't think that this one can be exploited on a quantum level. So I don't think that the | 1,637.92 | 1,642.72 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1642.72 | finding a random group element in a group of unknown orders. Yeah, I don't think that problem, | 1,642.72 | 1,649.52 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1649.52 | I think that might be a QVDF, but this is just an intuition and I don't have any proof of that | 1,649.52 | 1,654.4 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1654.4 | statement. Somebody's going to be very upset at me for saying that. I hope it's Andrew Polster. I hope | 1,654.4 | 1,658.72 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1658.72 | he emails me and he's like, you are fool. Well, if you're way off, I'm sure Ryan and I will take the | 1,658.72 | 1,663.6 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1663.6 | abuse in the forum. So let me handle that. I'll pop up one more for the AMA and see. Let's see what else | 1,663.6 | 1,671.84 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1671.84 | we got here. And I'll just read it out just because it's coming out in real time. So let's | 1,671.84 | 1,676.32 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1676.32 | quantum computers represent an exponential increase in processing capacity and eventually in | 1,676.32 | 1,680.8 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1680.8 | mining hash, how to guarantee the security of a network from attack 51% until the implementation | 1,680.8 | 1,687.12 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1687.12 | of proof of stake. If anybody wants to take that one, I'm just pulling this one in real time, | 1,687.12 | 1,692.4 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1692.4 | otherwise I would have popped it up on here. I think I got like half of it, honestly. | 1,692.4 | 1,699.36 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1699.3600000000001 | Yeah, for me. Yeah, I'll probably want to admit that I hear the whole thing. | 1,699.36 | 1,704.88 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1704.88 | Quantum computers represent an exponential increase in processing capacity and eventually in | 1,704.88 | 1,709.76 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1709.76 | mining hash, how do you guarantee the security of the network from 51% attacks until the | 1,709.76 | 1,715.04 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1715.0400000000002 | implementation of proof of stake happens? They kind of had a spelling error too and there, so I'm | 1,715.04 | 1,719.28 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1719.28 | just trying to read it. That's spelling error. But yeah. So the good news is that the mining | 1,719.28 | 1,726.08 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1726.08 | power is not vulnerable to quantum. If you look at like even Bitcoin, they're using Shot 256 | 1,726.08 | 1,731.36 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1731.36 | as their hash function. Quantum computers are not necessary. They get a quadratic, excuse me. | 1,731.36 | 1,738.48 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1738.48 | Yeah, they get a quadratic speed up from growers, which would represent a quadratic speed up in | 1,738.48 | 1,746.56 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1746.56 | like their rather quadratic increase in their relative hash power. But at the same | 1,746.56 | 1,754.72 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1754.72 | which could be right, if somebody came out with a huge ASIC tomorrow, the practical speed improvement. | 1,754.72 | 1,762.88 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1764.8 | Look, yeah, the network is not going to be vulnerable to quantum computers on the hash level. | 1,764.8 | 1,773.44 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1773.44 | It's going to be vulnerable to quantum computers on the 4-degree level. And the people are going to | 1,773.44 | 1,778 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1778.0 | be able to steal your money and then it'll be confirmed fairly. It's just done in Pauli normal time. | 1,778 | 1,782.64 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1783.2 | Yeah, right. Yeah, I get another one here that just came in in real time too. I'll pop it up on | 1,783.2 | 1,789.2 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1789.2 | here whoever wants to take it. These sound like great improvements to lattice-based systems. | 1,789.2 | 1,792.88 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1793.52 | Will there be further peer review? Whoever wants to take this one. We'll see maybe we've got one | 1,793.52 | 1,798.88 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1798.88 | more after this one to wrap up the A&A. Actually, I have a question about this personally because I | 1,798.88 | 1,804.96 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1804.96 | don't know exactly what the terms are for the QRL thing because we are writing a paper. We are | 1,804.96 | 1,810.32 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1810.3200000000002 | going to release it as a white paper. And we're also encouraging QRL to undergo an audit of what | 1,810.32 | 1,817.76 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1817.7600000000002 | we're doing independently of us so that there is a review by peers. But unless we submit that paper | 1,817.76 | 1,826.32 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1826.32 | for a journal, it won't technically be a peer review paper. And I'm not sure if that is what we plan | 1,826.32 | 1,834.72 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1834.72 | and maybe Mitchell has a better answer to that question. Yeah, yeah, so actually that is a great | 1,834.72 | 1,841.12 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1841.12 | question. There is some semi-internal semi-external peer review happening right now. Actually, | 1,841.12 | 1,847.28 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1847.28 | we're working with a crypto analysis expert. She's really digging into the parameter selection. | 1,847.28 | 1,852.64 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1852.64 | So that will be some incredibly valuable feedback. And then yeah, I think it would be great honestly | 1,852.64 | 1,859.12 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1859.1200000000001 | to get this through a peer review cycle. Because when we think about like, okay, what if something | 1,859.12 | 1,864.4 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1864.4 | is broken in the scheme? It could be broken in like two ways, right? The math or the code. | 1,864.4 | 1,867.76 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1868.72 | And so peer review papers is basically the best way to get all the eyes on the math. So I think | 1,868.72 | 1,874.48 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1874.48 | that would be a great step. Thanks for covering that. I think that kind of wraps up. We've | 1,874.48 | 1,881.36 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1881.36 | probably covered a number of questions that came in earlier for the first part of the AMA. | 1,881.36 | 1,885.12 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1885.12 | A couple here at the end. And myself and Michael, we appreciate you guys jumping on and | 1,885.12 | 1,889.84 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1891.04 | continuing our conversation for our first part one episode. And just chatting all things | 1,891.04 | 1,896.72 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1896.7199999999998 | post quantum cryptography. Because it's one of those areas where a lot of, there's just a | 1,896.72 | 1,903.04 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1903.04 | lack going on. Obviously, some people will see it now and kind of mites go off at some areas of it. | 1,903.04 | 1,908.64 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1908.64 | But as we move further and further along, it's definitely a lot of those things right in | 1,908.64 | 1,913.28 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1913.2800000000002 | the end. I'm going to roll out. So it's always interesting to find to have conversations with | 1,913.28 | 1,917.84 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1917.8400000000001 | you guys about it. Because you guys are on the leading edge of that part. But I appreciate you | 1,917.84 | 1,923.12 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1923.1200000000001 | guys coming on to chat with myself and Michael today. And is there any other closing thoughts you guys | 1,923.12 | 1,928.4 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1928.4 | got in your end? One last question. When prediction, when will 256 bit ECDSE break? | 1,928.4 | 1,938.08 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1939.3600000000001 | No comment. 256 bit. And you should ask all the troll papers, | 1,939.36 | 1,945.68 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1945.68 | nor is putting out lately. Yeah, I know, right? This destroy us. It's completely safe. You can even say | 1,945.68 | 1,956.48 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1956.48 | 2025 to 2040. Let's stick with 128 bit prediction. I think that 128 bits is going to be | 1,956.48 | 1,967.76 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1967.76 | commercially practical to break a key in reasonable period of time, like less than a month maybe, | 1,967.76 | 1,979.28 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1980.24 | probably by 2026. I would say that's probably a conservative guess. | 1,980.24 | 1,987.52 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1989.12 | Whether or not. And when I say commercially, I don't necessarily mean that | 1,989.12 | 1,992.56 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1992.56 | everybody will know that this technology exists. But right now, you can rent IBM quantum | 1,992.56 | 2,000.24 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2000.24 | computers. Right? And they're not great. They're they're the beginning of the technology. But | 2,000.24 | 2,006.32 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2007.2 | technically quantum computers are already commercially available. But the commercial | 2,007.2 | 2,011.28 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2011.28 | viability is a different question. And whether or not I can blow half a million dollars to break | 2,011.28 | 2,016.8 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2016.8 | one of Satoshi's keys in 2026 by renting an IBM quantum computer, I would put that probably at 5050. | 2,016.8 | 2,024.96 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2025.84 | But I think Satoshi was 256 bit and I wanted to avoid making a prediction about 256 bits. | 2,025.84 | 2,034 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2034.0 | Please, I noticed you qualified with commercial because we don't I don't know. Just before the | 2,034 | 2,039.68 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2039.68 | call, I just emailed the NSA and see if they could just give me an update. I'm still waiting to hear | 2,039.68 | 2,047.52 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2047.52 | back. I'm still waiting to hear back. Yeah. So like I would guess that it's going to be the beginning | 2,047.52 | 2,056.72 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2056.7200000000003 | of the end sometime in the next three or four years, like at the latest. And the real problem is | 2,056.72 | 2,062.88 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2062.88 | is that when it becomes commercially available, that's not when the apocalypse happens. | 2,062.88 | 2,068.08 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2068.08 | Right. The apocalypse happens before that. It happens right now. It's happening right now. | 2,068.08 | 2,074.4 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2074.4 | Because bunch of people aren't migrating their code from pre-quantum to post-quantum. | 2,074.4 | 2,078.96 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2078.96 | Can you imagine a scenario in which you're running a blockchain project? And you have to | 2,078.96 | 2,084.96 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2086.96 | expedite a quantum secure shoe horn. It's essentially a pilot. I mean, it's | 2,086.96 | 2,092.88 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2092.88 | a good idea. It would be such a huge undertaking. It's almost impossible if not impossible. | 2,092.88 | 2,099.6 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2099.6 | It's a large project. If it takes two to three years to migrate, right, like it'll take a | 2,099.6 | 2,105.52 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2105.52 | minimum of six months of R&D time to figure out what you're migrating to. It'll take a minimum | 2,105.52 | 2,111.12 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2111.12 | of a year for development and testing to be done. So that's production level. Right. Like you | 2,111.12 | 2,115.44 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2115.44 | add up all the different like periods of time that's going to take, oh, and by the way, | 2,115.44 | 2,119.2 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2119.2 | you're a decentralized project. So good luck coming to a decision. Right. Like even at Amazon, | 2,119.2 | 2,124.56 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2124.56 | it's going to take years and years for them to migrate over to post-quantum stuff. Right. | 2,124.56 | 2,127.92 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2129.04 | They have literally all the resources on the planet. I shouldn't say literally really close to | 2,129.04 | 2,135.12 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2135.12 | literally don't. I think one of the advantages of the projects that probably stand the best chance | 2,135.12 | 2,141.2 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t2141.68 | of the list of blockchains that need to quickly adapt are going to be the ones that have | 2,141.68 | 2,147.04 |