title
stringlengths 22
99
| published
unknown | url
stringlengths 28
28
| id
stringlengths 16
31
| text
stringlengths 1
553
| start
float64 0
15.2k
| end
float64 1.68
15.2k
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t919.92 | to miss a elliptical curve cryptography slash ECDSA when it's gone? No. It's not like losing an old, | 919.92 | 928.72 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t928.7199999999999 | you know, saying goodbye to an old friend, maybe they're going to jail for a while, | 928.72 | 931.6 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t931.6 | something like that. I was going to hope Adam was going to say something. Um, no, that at least from | 931.6 | 940.56 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t940.5600000000001 | a mathematician's perspective, elliptic curves are the reason that they're hard is because they're | 940.56 | 945.52 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t945.52 | hard. I mean, like the idea that that's like a really like vacuous statement, but elliptic curve | 945.52 | 951.04 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t951.0400000000001 | cryptography is annoying. And lattice based cryptography is this beautiful blend of linear algebra and | 951.04 | 959.28 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t959.28 | convex geometry and functional analysis. And I, and category theory, it's cool. It's just cool. | 959.28 | 967.92 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t967.92 | Whereas like, they looked at curve stuff. I'm, I, it just does not light my fire. And, you know, | 967.92 | 973.12 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t973.12 | I admit that this is a bias on my part. And probably there's going to be a whole group of mathematicians | 973.12 | 977.92 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t977.92 | that were mad at me. But, um, I just can't, I, I, I, not. I know when we check the comments. | 977.92 | 983.76 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t983.76 | What was the saying if everybody loves you, you're not something something right. So, | 983.76 | 988.56 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t989.28 | that, that leads into the next question, speaking of a lattice cryptography and, um, there's another | 989.28 | 994.32 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t994.3199999999999 | question that came from the community early on that we aggregated. So what are we looking at for | 994.32 | 998.72 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t998.72 | signing an verification for lattice based systems and how about aggregate signatures? So I just want | 998.72 | 1,004 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1004.0 | to, you guys want to jump into this one based on the question they're asking. | 1,004 | 1,007.52 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1007.52 | Okay. Mitchell, you did all the benchmarking. All I need to are. Yeah, yeah, I can jump into that. | 1,007.52 | 1,013.36 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1014.24 | So right now for, actually, let me just pull off the benchmarks. Um, so things are looking very | 1,014.24 | 1,020.8 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1020.8 | good. The most important thing I would say in terms of both space and time is verification. | 1,020.8 | 1,025.92 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1026.6399999999999 | Because when someone's generating a signature, for example, that only happens once on one person's | 1,026.64 | 1,030.64 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1030.6399999999999 | device, whereas when it comes to verification, that needs to happen to literally every person | 1,030.64 | 1,036.48 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1036.48 | who ever joins the blockchain at any time in the future. We've gotten this down to with 128 bits | 1,036.48 | 1,042.4 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1042.4 | of security, being able to aggregate 127 signatures into about two megabytes. And the whole thing | 1,042.4 | 1,051.04 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1051.04 | verifies in two seconds, under two seconds on my machine, meaning we're looking at about 15 | 1,051.04 | 1,057.12 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1057.12 | milliseconds of verification time per siner, which is pretty exciting. Um, the | 1,057.12 | 1,068.8 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1068.8 | to be perfectly clear here, I think that these numbers are too good to be true. So we're waiting | 1,068.8 | 1,075.44 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1075.4399999999998 | on some more results, but 15 milliseconds per signature is pretty awesome. Yeah, I ran that we ran | 1,075.44 | 1,083.28 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1083.28 | this on a bunch of machines and it ranged from 12 milliseconds to 17 milliseconds depending on | 1,083.28 | 1,089.84 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1091.04 | you know, the resources on the device. And that's single threaded. Yeah, so we haven't really done | 1,091.04 | 1,096.4 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1096.3999999999999 | any optimizations and actually, uh, you're able to, oh, sorry, I didn't mean to talk to you. | 1,096.4 | 1,101.28 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1101.28 | Well, you might be, uh, I'm wondering if there's a way you could, with the node, you could | 1,101.28 | 1,104.96 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1104.96 | multi thread, you know, use a CPU for each, each and all that. Then we're talking about being able | 1,104.96 | 1,110.88 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1110.88 | to scale based on the number of cores and or logical cores. Yeah, verification is highly parallel | 1,110.88 | 1,116.64 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1116.64 | izable because like I said, you're right, a lot of space cryptography is like this beautiful blend | 1,116.64 | 1,120.88 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1120.88 | of linear algebra and other stuff. And linear algebra happens to be what computers do. | 1,120.88 | 1,126.08 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1127.0400000000002 | I'm starting to see it. I'm starting to see it. Yeah, there's, there's a couple, um, kind of exciting | 1,127.04 | 1,133.84 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1133.8400000000001 | optimizations. There's like a small one I have been playing with, which is just a little bit of | 1,133.84 | 1,138 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1138.0 | code architecting how many function calls and overhead and stuff like that. And then I think, | 1,138 | 1,142.56 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1143.76 | there's essentially re potentially paradigmatic optimizations. So the first one, um, is using | 1,143.76 | 1,153.28 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1153.84 | compiling and C. So like right now, everything's running Python, but there's some ways you can | 1,153.84 | 1,157.52 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1157.52 | add decorators from like number and jit that will do some just in time compiling and run some of | 1,157.52 | 1,162.88 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1162.88 | your functions and see instead of Python. Um, so that might be some low hanging fruit for optimization. | 1,162.88 | 1,168.24 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1168.8000000000002 | I started playing with a little bit. It's not trivial, but, um, so that's one route. And that's | 1,168.8 | 1,173.44 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1173.44 | just kind of a fundamental faster way to process it. The second one is, oh, second, I'm going to be, | 1,173.44 | 1,182.72 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1182.72 | oh, yeah. So what we were just talking about, everything in in this library basically boils down to | 1,182.72 | 1,190.88 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1190.88 | adding lists of integers, multiplying lists of integers, modding lists of integers, or like list of | 1,190.88 | 1,197.04 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1197.0400000000002 | lists. And all of these are done element wise. So it's like first element plus first element, second | 1,197.04 | 1,202.4 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1202.4 | plus second, third plus third, fourth plus fourth. And so this is like the perfect thing to parallelize, | 1,202.4 | 1,207.04 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1207.0400000000002 | right? You have like a thousand elements. You have four cores. You sent 250 off to each, | 1,207.04 | 1,212.24 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1212.24 | and then boom, they bring it back together. So the fact that for almost all of the calculations, | 1,212.24 | 1,216.8 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1216.8 | what's happening on one set of elements doesn't impact what's happening on the other set of elements | 1,216.8 | 1,221.12 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1221.12 | is like perfect for this. Um, and so I think the between the compiling and parallelization, | 1,221.12 | 1,227.28 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1227.28 | there's probably some massive speed ups there that like a low level engineer could dive in and | 1,227.28 | 1,230.8 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1230.8 | it'd probably be low hanging fruit. Um, and then the third one is, uh, using a fixed number of non-zero | 1,230.8 | 1,237.28 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1237.28 | entries, Brandon, do you want to talk about that? It was your like brilliant idea. Oh, it's not | 1,237.28 | 1,240.8 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1240.8 | really a my brilliant idea. It's a trick they use in crystals that lithium to generate keys. Um, | 1,240.8 | 1,246.96 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1247.6 | generally for lattice based keys, if you do a naive definition of keys, you get a huge number of keys, | 1,247.6 | 1,253.28 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1253.28 | like so many more keys than what is considered cryptographically secure, right? Like we're talking like | 1,253.28 | 1,259.92 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1261.2 | two to the thousandth or something like that or more two to the 10,000, you know, like ridiculous | 1,261.2 | 1,266.32 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1266.32 | numbers of keys. Um, so what you can do is instead of rolling keys like normal, you can set a whole | 1,266.32 | 1,272.24 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1272.24 | bunch of entries to the varif kit to the secret key to zero and then just pick a few of the entries | 1,272.24 | 1,278.4 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1278.3999999999999 | to be non-zero. And that way you just need to store the indices of the non-zero entries and that way | 1,278.4 | 1,284.8 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1284.8 | you store a lot less of the key, right? And you still end up with a cryptographically large number | 1,284.8 | 1,289.52 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1289.52 | of keys and the cryptography problems are still just as hard to solve, right? So we come up with a | 1,289.52 | 1,295.44 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1295.44 | little implementations like that, but you know what the real mind-blower for this is, I'm not sure | 1,295.44 | 1,301.2 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1301.2 | if I have a total Mitchell about this. I haven't told Adam about this a lot. You guys are gonna like | 1,301.2 | 1,305.68 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1305.68 | this. So the reason that we, uh, we can manage to do this element-wise arithmetic that Mitchell | 1,305.68 | 1,312.48 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1312.48 | was just talking about is the magic of something called the number theoretic transform. The number | 1,312.48 | 1,317.84 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1317.8400000000001 | theoretic transform is sort of a version of the Fourier transform. If anybody's ever taken an | 1,317.84 | 1,322.8 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1322.8 | electrical engineering class or a calculus class or something like that. And here's what's interesting | 1,322.8 | 1,327.12 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1327.12 | about the Fourier transform. It's also what your brain does to the incoming information from your | 1,327.12 | 1,333.52 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1333.52 | eye between your eye and the V1 area of your brain. Your brain does a wavelet decomposition on the | 1,333.52 | 1,340.24 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1340.24 | input data and the both time it hits the V1 area of your brain, it's just decomposed already. So they | 1,340.24 | 1,346.32 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1346.32 | can opt- so your brain can optimally compute off of that information. And your ear does the same | 1,346.32 | 1,352 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1352.0 | thing too. Your ear does Fourier decomposition. It just splits the data up into the most optimal | 1,352 | 1,358 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1358.0 | representation before it even hits the A1 area of your brain, the audio one area of your brain. | 1,358 | 1,363.44 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1363.44 | And what we're doing for this cryptography or for to make this cryptography go faster is we're | 1,363.44 | 1,368.24 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1368.24 | basically using the same trick that evolution landed on from nature in order to just | 1,368.24 | 1,372.08 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1372.8 | boom, split everything first and then do the computation on that raw data. I mean, if that's not | 1,372.8 | 1,378.32 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1378.32 | beautiful, you don't have a heart. If I'm not mistaken, Fourier transforms also would get supply | 1,378.32 | 1,386.72 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1386.72 | to qubits. It's one reason why like sure as algorithm and stuff can be run or not faster. | 1,386.72 | 1,394.72 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1394.72 | Yeah, I think that's part of the processing. It's called the quantum Fourier transform, exactly. | 1,394.72 | 1,401.68 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1401.68 | All right, yeah. Thank you for that answer. Yeah, I think right now we should do a strike to | 1,401.68 | 1,409.52 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1409.52 | interject. We should do probably just for everyone that's watching this, we're going to do maybe | 1,409.52 | 1,413.44 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1413.44 | we'll do one or two more questions that we pull the ahead of time we pull then. And for everyone | 1,413.44 | 1,418.32 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1418.3200000000002 | watching, if you want to ask a question as we trail on and part of our AMA here, throw it into the | 1,418.32 | 1,424.4 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1424.4 | chat here so we can go through and pull a few more of those. But I know Michael, you had another | 1,424.4 | 1,429.2 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1429.2 | one in here related to atomic swaps that we wanted to pull in. So yeah, it might have been covered | 1,429.2 | 1,433.92 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1433.92 | already the question. Yeah, how will I do the last one if not? Yeah. Yeah, you guys can tell me if | 1,433.92 | 1,439.52 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1439.52 | it's covered, if it was covered fully, how will atomic swaps and lattice six contribute to the | 1,439.52 | 1,444.72 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1444.72 | network? I think you touched on that quite a bit in one of the previous questions. Yeah. | 1,444.72 | 1,447.92 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1448.96 | Yeah. All right, we'll just do the last question then here that we have | 1,448.96 | 1,453.2 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1453.2 | preview of value you're ready. Yeah, go ahead. Yeah, I think it's what is I'll just read what | 1,453.2 | 1,459.84 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1459.8400000000001 | they wrote here. Have you have you evaluated proof of history style POS for QRL? Could that be made | 1,459.84 | 1,465.52 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1466.0800000000002 | QR quantum resistant benefits by high performance L1? Okay, so that's just a question pulled in. | 1,466.08 | 1,471.44 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1472.24 | Either we can touch on that or if other people have questions, it's up to you guys on this one. | 1,472.24 | 1,477.52 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1477.52 | What was POH? I had to look up POH. Proof of history. Yeah, same here proof of history. | 1,477.52 | 1,483.44 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1483.44 | This is really no, this is one of those interesting questions, but not because the question is | 1,483.44 | 1,490.48 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1490.48 | interesting, even though the question is sort of interesting, it's because somebody in the audience | 1,490.48 | 1,494.08 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1494.08 | wanted to bring up proof of history. And so they were like, hey, let's mention this. | 1,494.08 | 1,498 |
Post Quantum Cryptography with Geometry Labs- Part II + AMA | "2021-07-30T06:49:52" | https://youtu.be/IWqIgk2Vv5A | IWqIgk2Vv5A-t1498.0 | My one of your projects have proof of history. Yeah, oh G. I've never heard of G. B. F. | 1,498 | 1,505.36 |