values
sequence | metadata
dict |
|---|---|
[
-0.11883839964866638,
0.04829868674278259,
-0.0025480559561401606,
-0.011011209338903427,
0.05195074528455734,
0.010291832499206066,
0.1154332384467125,
0.0007007909007370472,
-0.08592535555362701,
-0.07065396010875702,
0.0013317164266481996,
-0.035472381860017776,
0.018434155732393265,
-0.006737178191542625,
0.024402987211942673,
-0.029503243044018745,
-0.058138374239206314,
-0.05043954402208328,
-0.020765526220202446,
0.029036032035946846,
-0.06367600709199905,
0.024029914289712906,
0.0262432973831892,
-0.006037362851202488,
-0.011076544411480427,
-0.0014006864512339234,
-0.018619801849126816,
0.03277004510164261,
0.0028860096354037523,
-0.05694391578435898,
-0.04394163936376572,
0.025414075702428818,
0.08790954202413559,
-0.02499123103916645,
-0.03668315336108208,
0.0062413448467850685,
-0.06646791845560074,
-0.0671444833278656,
0.020564241334795952,
0.04238877445459366,
0.021880215033888817,
-0.04288247600197792,
-0.03437700495123863,
0.06146686151623726,
0.0656372681260109,
-0.0785202905535698,
0.029487011954188347,
0.010798297822475433,
0.06332410126924515,
-0.04508465901017189,
-0.01823394186794758,
-0.027721041813492775,
-0.0036737609189003706,
-0.03659451752901077,
0.054250262677669525,
-0.02085655927658081,
0.015034922398626804,
-0.060095224529504776,
0.016393909230828285,
-0.03323858231306076,
0.01750349812209606,
-0.0005952207720838487,
-0.16348379850387573,
0.08492093533277512,
-0.07583844661712646,
0.0161097701638937,
0.048382941633462906,
-0.007598146330565214,
-0.024985475465655327,
0.05949747934937477,
0.0658901110291481,
-0.03513742983341217,
0.0008843158720992506,
-0.11567969620227814,
0.049390342086553574,
0.03360460326075554,
0.055154237896203995,
0.026383694261312485,
0.053694359958171844,
0.038932498544454575,
0.0004393816343508661,
0.0180604699999094,
-0.09288253635168076,
-0.004073987249284983,
-0.0008234609267674387,
-0.04883106052875519,
-0.006677441764622927,
-0.023541681468486786,
-0.03813307359814644,
0.05245159938931465,
-0.042493823915719986,
-0.055899728089571,
0.08681583404541016,
-0.04896170645952225,
-0.08339672535657883,
-0.0457635223865509,
0.029042238369584084,
0.03465776517987251,
-0.08649188280105591,
0.4062184691429138,
0.03594949096441269,
0.018697189167141914,
0.0979783833026886,
-0.007865204475820065,
0.023714108392596245,
-0.05756505951285362,
-0.06109985336661339,
-0.006620500702410936,
0.007060033269226551,
0.021669859066605568,
-0.024405108764767647,
-0.033514637500047684,
0.00025015627034008503,
0.03170765936374664,
0.04407161846756935,
0.09463243186473846,
-0.035580113530159,
-0.0045343064703047276,
0.043714847415685654,
0.00020504710846580565,
-0.002858717693015933,
-0.024884076789021492,
0.0037606365513056517,
0.014041258953511715,
0.07781578600406647,
-0.1323145031929016,
0.0068764761090278625,
-7.2201250750405e-33,
0.007334581576287746,
0.002726183971390128,
0.012147537432610989,
-0.002440247917547822,
0.027932560071349144,
0.03927065059542656,
0.003743888111785054,
-0.04643532633781433,
-0.014492551796138287,
0.05360198765993118,
0.006590632256120443,
0.03664784133434296,
-0.023135676980018616,
0.03275369852781296,
0.07811082899570465,
0.009627518244087696,
0.007964123040437698,
0.0028742437716573477,
-0.0018807238666340709,
0.004691542126238346,
-0.012402275577187538,
-0.0008041393011808395,
-0.023038707673549652,
0.04297299310564995,
-0.028259985148906708,
-0.06694644689559937,
0.038539037108421326,
-0.07085712999105453,
0.020109260454773903,
0.001460324041545391,
0.0014639950823038816,
0.049912355840206146,
-0.02594558522105217,
0.0008223677286878228,
-0.03757276013493538,
-0.028740663081407547,
0.03337514027953148,
-0.07462829351425171,
-0.035983964800834656,
0.025680823251605034,
-0.050139084458351135,
0.010837196372449398,
-0.04243791848421097,
-0.002668545348569751,
-0.004916265141218901,
0.16647927463054657,
-0.0011541391722857952,
-0.004960660357028246,
-0.06482207775115967,
0.06976216286420822,
-0.0028182310052216053,
-0.02132517658174038,
-0.11613703519105911,
0.04333868995308876,
-0.0033509607892483473,
-0.020106570795178413,
0.016554009169340134,
-0.043971188366413116,
0.020619438961148262,
-0.009089959785342216,
0.009713641367852688,
0.039391469210386276,
-0.012487754225730896,
0.009350251406431198,
-0.08647788316011429,
-0.04851773753762245,
0.02447775937616825,
-0.008494960144162178,
0.023063570261001587,
-0.012638214975595474,
-0.05100997909903526,
0.03675990551710129,
0.03771744668483734,
0.030916057527065277,
-0.028798431158065796,
-0.01926880143582821,
-0.019831717014312744,
0.03583517670631409,
0.08063048869371414,
0.00649732630699873,
0.03545527532696724,
-0.041958946734666824,
0.006693818140774965,
-0.024078864604234695,
0.09502369910478592,
0.054634999483823776,
0.004220988135784864,
-0.05180729925632477,
0.01021517813205719,
-0.041098661720752716,
-0.03574559465050697,
0.06131820008158684,
-0.0030944310128688812,
0.08796171098947525,
0.006000818684697151,
4.4925641867161134e-33,
-0.07716735452413559,
0.01899317093193531,
-0.03573813661932945,
0.0887979194521904,
-0.01755509153008461,
-0.0027626880910247564,
0.037273939698934555,
0.09013677388429642,
-0.09250447154045105,
0.0680299699306488,
0.022390201687812805,
-0.045089662075042725,
0.030878892168402672,
0.044495198875665665,
-0.005799654871225357,
0.03523358702659607,
0.06968843936920166,
-0.004063474480062723,
-0.028155116364359856,
-0.03572935611009598,
-0.030507177114486694,
-0.03237851336598396,
-0.0024998304434120655,
0.034929435700178146,
-0.04148077219724655,
0.030205287039279938,
0.04858911409974098,
0.0632987916469574,
-0.021693143993616104,
0.036800533533096313,
0.03896567225456238,
-0.023581488057971,
-0.05063262954354286,
-0.05820295587182045,
0.04826247692108154,
0.08404397964477539,
0.03678114339709282,
-0.0007768925279378891,
0.024848245084285736,
-0.05051735043525696,
0.039668887853622437,
-0.010082785040140152,
0.002244437113404274,
0.11697717010974884,
-0.021961307153105736,
-0.005805923603475094,
-0.048092879354953766,
0.003788944333791733,
0.035172659903764725,
0.07729728519916534,
-0.09319712221622467,
-0.011992926709353924,
-0.021968109533190727,
0.04129430651664734,
-0.022958293557167053,
0.004160518292337656,
-0.0432187058031559,
0.0702132061123848,
-0.01905948668718338,
0.0004752702370751649,
0.005480603780597448,
0.026761434972286224,
-0.033612821251153946,
0.01346849836409092,
-0.022746674716472626,
0.03873894736170769,
-0.024523282423615456,
-0.03632815554738045,
-0.0017924589337781072,
-0.052569907158613205,
0.006689464673399925,
-0.025846485048532486,
-0.1348353624343872,
0.0011394252069294453,
-0.047169335186481476,
-0.05347497761249542,
-0.018427148461341858,
-0.007304163184016943,
-0.009657083079218864,
-0.037726134061813354,
-0.033999841660261154,
0.01841733604669571,
-0.008003143593668938,
-0.005512353032827377,
-0.03353199362754822,
-0.0201805979013443,
0.021665804088115692,
0.01075822301208973,
-0.05747472122311592,
0.01969684660434723,
-0.007240809965878725,
0.023037107661366463,
0.12023406475782394,
0.0032419958151876926,
0.010150063782930374,
-1.3403668397415913e-8,
-0.046724583953619,
0.04062063992023468,
-0.05561641603708267,
-0.0018853341462090611,
0.056323979049921036,
0.049638908356428146,
-0.04154156893491745,
0.0325038842856884,
0.02574923262000084,
-0.018780937418341637,
0.06920813769102097,
0.02598794549703598,
-0.02782331220805645,
0.05757509544491768,
0.09128093719482422,
-0.01532574463635683,
-0.10472093522548676,
-0.027585938572883606,
-0.016222817823290825,
-0.035399287939071655,
-0.010461363941431046,
-0.013999390415847301,
-0.0002939800324384123,
-0.08362972736358643,
0.007932317443192005,
0.006960071157664061,
-0.04422977939248085,
0.07475824654102325,
0.07440952211618423,
-0.04058071970939636,
-0.0018266832921653986,
0.01985001191496849,
0.014382191933691502,
0.020585300400853157,
0.02213379554450512,
-0.06437048316001892,
-0.06369856745004654,
0.01613914780318737,
0.009907381609082222,
-0.0055595203302800655,
-0.05467313155531883,
-0.0233115516602993,
0.07046928256750107,
0.006468005012720823,
-0.047700025141239166,
-0.0036470729392021894,
0.007837599143385887,
-0.004974569659680128,
-0.01241857185959816,
-0.07781214267015457,
-0.0009409073390997946,
-0.008002524264156818,
0.006034235469996929,
0.08434933423995972,
0.10730371624231339,
0.011427774094045162,
0.013366665691137314,
-0.012747352942824364,
0.061454374343156815,
0.03564131259918213,
0.1587459295988083,
0.12640950083732605,
0.04654904082417488,
-0.015717294067144394
] | {
"pdf_file": "6E3WYLLW5ZLHABZK74PHX5TBLZXXBLGG.pdf",
"text": " "
} |
[
-0.10190773010253906,
0.00552688492462039,
0.027133915573358536,
-0.12169297784566879,
-0.02382531203329563,
-0.029720334336161613,
-0.041077204048633575,
0.058481715619564056,
0.08712093532085419,
0.08633477985858917,
0.007547158282250166,
-0.000930227804929018,
0.007652290165424347,
-0.061522845178842545,
0.027899228036403656,
-0.0003137757012154907,
0.027036651968955994,
0.017100811004638672,
-0.029270924627780914,
0.01111749280244112,
0.0014501434052363038,
0.08179960399866104,
-0.08384444564580917,
-0.015629325062036514,
0.051694538444280624,
-0.03482350707054138,
-0.05698256567120552,
-0.10773348808288574,
-0.008627748116850853,
-0.04415182024240494,
0.002162188058719039,
-0.03466581180691719,
-0.06310590356588364,
-0.04323612153530121,
0.013690248131752014,
0.0069327931851148605,
0.0011436670320108533,
0.03450571373105049,
0.034251611679792404,
0.06672918051481247,
-0.01198070589452982,
-0.09142878651618958,
-0.029368167743086815,
-0.025604097172617912,
-0.03166317939758301,
-0.036491509526968,
-0.01868988387286663,
0.023725392296910286,
-0.0007494738092646003,
0.0047446927055716515,
-0.01675638183951378,
-0.025573845952749252,
0.001991712488234043,
0.02414848282933235,
-0.02877235785126686,
-0.015517092309892178,
0.03396778553724289,
0.054527997970581055,
-0.003971795551478863,
0.07801081985235214,
-0.045132651925086975,
0.004314301535487175,
0.018877960741519928,
0.07862412184476852,
-0.09378331154584885,
0.028138864785432816,
0.030589913949370384,
-0.0464135967195034,
-0.011791310273110867,
-0.06037793681025505,
0.06837421655654907,
-0.04378766193985939,
0.0755215734243393,
-0.07487309724092484,
0.07181841135025024,
0.0020406118128448725,
-0.014767209067940712,
0.14530403912067413,
0.08430426567792892,
-0.09475985169410706,
0.06163739785552025,
-0.02178008295595646,
-0.06255602836608887,
0.004406149499118328,
-0.0322476290166378,
-0.00868831668049097,
-0.015526942908763885,
0.026351669803261757,
0.04319930076599121,
-0.001340879942290485,
0.09817447513341904,
0.0026829789858311415,
0.036348406225442886,
-0.01883373223245144,
-0.02674018032848835,
0.038749754428863525,
-0.02928777039051056,
-0.00029925970011390746,
-0.04877607151865959,
0.05253839120268822,
-0.01735132746398449,
0.005094583611935377,
-0.010262208990752697,
0.02450515888631344,
0.04502008855342865,
-0.03773583844304085,
0.03073706477880478,
0.011266159825026989,
-0.007325952406972647,
-0.12939469516277313,
0.03990524262189865,
0.020499302074313164,
0.0162157341837883,
0.02262362651526928,
-0.016936613246798515,
-0.007462739013135433,
-0.0007524635293520987,
0.022072818130254745,
0.0352708101272583,
-0.068757563829422,
0.0021187947131693363,
0.049146026372909546,
-0.12229297310113907,
-0.04052092507481575,
-0.006859421730041504,
0.039487048983573914,
0.0058290534652769566,
2.1276633257585643e-33,
0.07417979836463928,
0.021354492753744125,
0.04305361211299896,
-0.035969607532024384,
0.025262298062443733,
-0.007347882259637117,
-0.02284076437354088,
0.008553016930818558,
0.026957282796502113,
-0.03897413983941078,
-0.06582555919885635,
0.013462824746966362,
0.005698475521057844,
-0.06317932903766632,
-0.08930910378694534,
0.06596129387617111,
-0.10412430018186569,
0.06786787509918213,
-0.016657527536153793,
0.009941045194864273,
0.07950887829065323,
-0.04611911252140999,
-0.0723344013094902,
0.12165500968694687,
-0.03829795867204666,
0.08836594223976135,
-0.0015988905215635896,
-0.06448189169168472,
-0.03811609745025635,
0.022924063727259636,
-0.04113025963306427,
-0.009136243723332882,
0.1557496041059494,
0.036911722272634506,
0.04935343191027641,
0.006908852607011795,
0.05775238201022148,
0.03929893299937248,
0.01934373937547207,
-0.0031676352955400944,
-0.042244065552949905,
0.06268429011106491,
0.08885464817285538,
0.06410578638315201,
-0.08405003696680069,
-0.017285672947764397,
0.035993192344903946,
0.027195444330573082,
0.03671035170555115,
0.03168542683124542,
0.008861963637173176,
-0.036427419632673264,
0.06730607151985168,
-0.008085045032203197,
0.014248868450522423,
0.03068593703210354,
-0.03878023475408554,
0.058271102607250214,
0.011303511448204517,
0.03198273479938507,
0.00215526414103806,
0.12940195202827454,
-0.02976957894861698,
-0.025544509291648865,
-0.1109134703874588,
-0.012152636423707008,
0.0025317352265119553,
-0.057110078632831573,
0.06567980349063873,
-0.14328408241271973,
-0.03722967579960823,
0.061900991946458817,
0.02980087883770466,
0.0008600949659012258,
0.03405998647212982,
-0.02220158465206623,
0.08219127357006073,
-0.010865476913750172,
-0.08085821568965912,
-0.06743020564317703,
-0.026552610099315643,
-0.08817923069000244,
0.043745096772909164,
0.03254719451069832,
0.031907569617033005,
-0.028729818761348724,
0.006481125019490719,
-0.0015618860488757491,
-0.03311861306428909,
0.003988140728324652,
-0.05623650923371315,
0.005810508504509926,
0.0540849007666111,
0.08080088347196579,
0.06494428217411041,
-3.421589283439174e-33,
0.016047323122620583,
-0.026351170614361763,
0.009726756252348423,
0.016864590346813202,
0.04888322576880455,
-0.05451376363635063,
0.021193407475948334,
-0.03541506081819534,
0.025529811158776283,
-0.09478471428155899,
-0.015879705548286438,
0.09066839516162872,
0.029017210006713867,
0.07286635041236877,
-0.07397328317165375,
0.05938170105218887,
-0.05370836332440376,
-0.095696821808815,
-0.029623277485370636,
-0.0053133899345994,
0.03166550397872925,
0.01700453646481037,
-0.02387247420847416,
0.08112648129463196,
0.03219553828239441,
0.10888691991567612,
0.02852017618715763,
-0.031377773731946945,
0.01149756833910942,
-0.0016385301714763045,
0.010714538395404816,
-0.01594235934317112,
-0.051597557961940765,
-0.02463318035006523,
-0.05067535117268562,
-0.038105227053165436,
0.08277703821659088,
0.015475650317966938,
-0.06250835210084915,
0.022922655567526817,
0.0691991075873375,
0.01152412872761488,
0.0233747698366642,
-0.014991131611168385,
0.010675240308046341,
0.02941153571009636,
0.10312460362911224,
-0.056649670004844666,
-0.006120607722550631,
-0.025084439665079117,
-0.005023358389735222,
-0.0036183258052915335,
-0.041858214884996414,
0.10436306893825531,
-0.00630147522315383,
0.003720669774338603,
0.039520736783742905,
-0.0032930641900748014,
-0.02057093009352684,
-0.047351207584142685,
0.017637068405747414,
0.028529655188322067,
0.011988140642642975,
-0.015528486110270023,
0.047314051538705826,
-0.008971155621111393,
0.015320313163101673,
-0.023200351744890213,
-0.001126656774431467,
-0.046714313328266144,
-0.005531563889235258,
-0.13315299153327942,
-0.03878636285662651,
-0.11260619014501572,
0.040162812918424606,
0.07033288478851318,
-0.028654223307967186,
-0.10374583303928375,
-0.04104429483413696,
0.02585836499929428,
-0.035426314920186996,
-0.07980453968048096,
-0.030552105978131294,
-0.026058075949549675,
-0.054096776992082596,
0.04757006838917732,
0.053697314113378525,
-0.06838109344244003,
0.0364503376185894,
0.07483991980552673,
-0.09724915027618408,
-0.0072352709248661995,
-0.0023962727282196283,
0.027469560503959656,
0.045127835124731064,
-5.5443333479843204e-8,
0.09461463242769241,
0.06574747711420059,
-0.0737672671675682,
0.010642818175256252,
-0.01476073358207941,
-0.10377160459756851,
-0.06142197549343109,
0.02166120335459709,
0.042793404310941696,
0.06276627629995346,
0.003263615071773529,
0.0535864382982254,
-0.02158953621983528,
-0.0510718934237957,
-0.008733614347875118,
0.044835057109594345,
-0.10946065932512283,
-0.04073035717010498,
-0.030750596895813942,
-0.003233227413147688,
-0.06257770210504532,
-0.05761365965008736,
-0.046982232481241226,
-0.058549914509058,
0.09048342704772949,
-0.10249517112970352,
0.019376324489712715,
0.015433209016919136,
0.041134633123874664,
-0.00647461274638772,
-0.09058012068271637,
0.07523950934410095,
-0.06770540028810501,
-0.07538442313671112,
0.03488043695688248,
-0.03792886063456535,
-0.07071083784103394,
0.019066857174038887,
0.07433652132749557,
0.09613185375928879,
-0.014989092946052551,
-0.03272194415330887,
0.010801154188811779,
0.011549131013453007,
0.02459528297185898,
-0.033491890877485275,
0.0366196446120739,
0.016254274174571037,
0.04373988136649132,
-0.05453348904848099,
-0.03479282930493355,
-0.05001063272356987,
-0.01293802261352539,
-0.04119136184453964,
0.025931544601917267,
0.00416534161195159,
0.018483053892850876,
0.032105352729558945,
-0.00509645277634263,
-0.04329796880483627,
-0.08649773895740509,
0.015976620838046074,
0.08220863342285156,
-0.036480020731687546
] | {
"pdf_file": "D6HDJJ7UEFJGI3ZLUWIWMZHJJDO7MRGC.pdf",
"text": "IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS \nFOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT \n \n \nNo. 14 -31037 \n \n JONATHAN P. ROBICHEAUX; DEREK PENTON; \nNADINE BLANCHARD; COURTNEY BLANCHARD, \n \n Plaintiffs– Appellants, \n \nversus \n \nJAMES D. CALDWELL, \n in His Official Capacity as the Louisiana Attorney General, \n Also Known as Buddy Caldwell, \n Defendant–Appellee. \n \n* * * * * \n \nJONATHAN P. ROBICHEAUX; DEREK PENTON; NADINE BLANCHARD; \nCOURTNEY BLANCHARD; ROBERT WELLES; GARTH BEAUREGARD, \n Plaintiffs– Appellants, \n \nversus \n \nDEVIN GEORGE, in His Official Capacity as the State Registrar \n and Center Director at Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals; \nTIM BARFIELD, \n in His Official Capacity as the Louisiana Secretary of Revenue; \nKATHY KLIEBERT, in Her Official Capacity as \n the Louisiana Secretary of Health and Hospitals, \n \n Defendants– Appellees. \n \n* * * * * \n United States Court of Appeals \nFifth Circuit \nFILED \nJuly 1, 2015 \n \nLyle W. Cay ce \nClerk Case: 14-31037 Document: 00513102238 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/01/2015 No. 14- 31037 \n2 \n FORUM FOR EQUALITY LOUISIANA, INCORPORATED; \nJACQUELINE M. BRETTNER; M. LAUREN BRETTNER; \nNICHOLAS J. VAN SICKELS; ANDREW S. BOND; HENRY LAMBERT; \nR. CAREY BOND; L. HAVARD SCOTT, III; SERGIO MARCH PRIETO, \n \n Plaintiffs– Appellants, \n \nversus \n \nTIM BARFIELD, in His Official Capacity as \n Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Revenue; \nDEVIN GEORGE, in His Official Capacity as Louisiana State Registrar, \n Defendants-Appellees. \n \n \n \nAppeals from the United States District Court \nfor the Eastern District of Louisiana \n \n \nBefore HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. \nJERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: \n The plaintiffs are seven same-sex couples and an organization whose \nmembership includes same-sex couples and their families. The couples seek to \nmarry in Louisiana or to have their marriage in another state recognized in \nLouisiana. They sued the state defendants for declaratory and injunctive \nrelief, asking the district court to declare unconstitutional article XII, § 15 of \nthe Louisiana Constitution, article 3520(B) of th e Louisiana Civil Code, and \nany other Louisiana law that prohibits same-sex couples from marrying in Lou-\nisiana or having their marriages recognized. The various plaintiffs claimed Case: 14-31037 Document: 00513102238 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/01/2015 No. 14- 31037 \n3 \n violations of the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth \nAmendment, the Full Faith and Credit Clause, and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The \nactions were consolidated. \n On September 3, 2014, the district court, without the benefit of subse-\nquent controlling Supreme Court precedent, granted defendants’ motion for \nsummary judg ment and denied plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. The \nplaintiffs appealed. After full briefing, including participation by numer ous \namici curiae, this court heard expanded oral argument on January 9, 2015. \n While this appeal was u nder submission, the Supreme Court decided \nObergefell v. Hodges , No. 14-556, 2015 U.S. LEXIS 4250 (U.S. June 26, 2015). \nIn summary, the Court declared that \nthe right to marry is a fundamental right inherent in the liberty of the \nperson, and under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the \nFourteenth Amendment couples of the same-sex may not be deprived of \nthat right and that liberty. The Court now holds that same- sex couples \nmay exercise the fundamental right to marry. No longer may this lib-\nerty be denied to them. Baker v. Nelson [, 409 U.S. 810 (1972),] must \nbe and now is overruled, and the State laws challenged by petitioners \nin these cases are now held invalid to the extent they exclude same-sex \ncouples from civil marriage on the same terms and conditions as \nopposite- sex couples. \nId. at *41 –42. “It follows that the Court must also hold—and it now does hold—\nthat there is no lawful basis for a State to refuse to recognize a lawful same-\nsex marriage performed in another State on the ground of its same-sex \ncharacter.” Id. at *50. \n Having addressed fundamental rights under the Fourteenth Amend-\nment, the Court, importantly, invoked the First Amendment, as well: \n Finally, it must be emphasized that religions, and those who adhere \nto religious doctrines, may continue to advocate with utmost, sincere conviction that, by divine precepts, same-sex marriage should not be \ncondoned. The First Amendment ensures that religious organizations Case: 14-31037 Document: 00513102238 Page: 3 Date Filed: 07/01/2015 No. 14- 31037 \n4 \n and persons are given proper protection as they seek to teach the \nprinciples that are so fulfilling and so central to their lives and faiths, and to their own deep aspirations to continue the family structure they \nhave long revered. The same is true of those who oppose same-sex \nmarriage for other reasons. In turn, those who believe allowing same-\nsex mar riage is proper or indeed essential, whether as a matter of \nreligious con viction or secular belief, may engage those who disagree \nwith their view in an open and searching debate. The Constitution, however, does not permit the State to bar same-sex couples from \nmarriage on the same terms as accorded to couples of the opposite sex. \nId. at *48– 49. \n Obergefell, in both its Fourteent h and First Amendment iterations, is the \nlaw of the land and, consequently, the law of this circuit\n1 and should not be \ntaken lightly by actors within the jurisdiction of this court. We express no view \non how controversies involving the intersection of these rights should be \nresolved but instead leave that to the robust operation of our system of laws \nand the good faith of those who are impacted by them. \n This court sought and promptly received letter advisories from plaintiffs \nand the state, asking their respective positions on the proper disposition in \nlight of Obergefell. They are agreed that the judgment should be reversed and \nremanded for entry of judgment in favor of plaintiffs. \n Because this court agrees that that is the required result, the judgme nt \nappealed from is REVERSED, and this matter is REMANDED for entry of judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. The district court must act expeditiously \non remand, especially in view of the declining health of plaintiff Robert Welles. \n \n1 If it were suggested that any part of the quoted passages is o biter dictum , we need \nonly recall that although “[w]e are not bound by dicta, even of our own court [,] [d]icta of the \nSupreme Court are, of course, another matter.” United States v. Becton , 632 F.2d 1294, \n1296 n.3 (5th Cir. 1980). “[W]e give serious consideration to this recent and detailed discus -\nsion of the law by a majority of the Supreme Court.” Geralds v. Entergy Servs., Inc. , 709 F.3d \n448, 452 (5th Cir. 2013) (Reavley, J.). Case: 14-31037 Document: 00513102238 Page: 4 Date Filed: 07/01/2015 No. 14- 31037 \n5 \n The court should enter final judgment on the merits (exclusive of any collateral \nmatters such as costs and attorney fees) by July 17, 2015, and earlier if reason-\nably possible.2 \n The mandate shall issue forthwith. \n \n \n \n2 Any pe nding motions are denied as moot. Case: 14-31037 Document: 00513102238 Page: 5 Date Filed: 07/01/2015"
} |
[
-0.06734725087881088,
-0.013740203343331814,
0.04460004344582558,
0.013078265823423862,
0.012381154112517834,
-0.050531286746263504,
0.0714508518576622,
-0.05859938636422157,
-0.0619145892560482,
-0.02963387593626976,
-0.007247773464769125,
-0.04485571011900902,
-0.04895423725247383,
-0.039690326899290085,
0.005983197130262852,
0.01588517241179943,
0.03337132930755615,
-0.10405728965997696,
-0.0035708972718566656,
-0.016677888110280037,
0.1442909985780716,
-0.03048621118068695,
-0.00511587131768465,
-0.08249864727258682,
-0.07870878279209137,
0.08541412651538849,
-0.0538162887096405,
0.07005903869867325,
0.007291371002793312,
-0.08485207706689835,
0.0526532344520092,
0.10340939462184906,
0.08002982288599014,
-0.05729515105485916,
0.0721360370516777,
-0.0036965166218578815,
-0.0434282124042511,
-0.0537293516099453,
0.04556611180305481,
-0.028862450271844864,
-0.049039702862501144,
-0.023152558133006096,
-0.0721142515540123,
0.026890747249126434,
-0.04412637650966644,
-0.03800932690501213,
0.07330049574375153,
-0.050313789397478104,
0.017994925379753113,
-0.04050563648343086,
0.013137640431523323,
-0.014866851270198822,
-0.01782812923192978,
0.0314381942152977,
-0.04606366157531738,
-0.004536876920610666,
-0.0020680068992078304,
-0.10287388414144516,
-0.03745685890316963,
-0.046727292239665985,
0.024336932227015495,
0.03886646777391434,
-0.05675096809864044,
0.006876107305288315,
-0.012946927919983864,
0.007572207599878311,
-0.07127867639064789,
0.00627991184592247,
0.027632027864456177,
-0.07919896394014359,
-0.03137829154729843,
0.0383649580180645,
-0.015933115035295486,
0.05381898209452629,
0.016251305118203163,
0.06259243935346603,
0.040693435817956924,
0.0062140850350260735,
0.002664669416844845,
-0.03896868973970413,
0.08212366700172424,
0.05440477281808853,
0.05106855928897858,
0.027740081772208214,
-0.01762915588915348,
-0.008592166937887669,
0.030185693874955177,
0.0029829179402440786,
0.06962134689092636,
0.04949313774704933,
0.09515181928873062,
-0.0118603790178895,
-0.009882397018373013,
0.014382177963852882,
0.15172012150287628,
-0.020424971356987953,
0.03144092485308647,
-0.06069550663232803,
-0.05427345633506775,
0.04931861162185669,
-0.062281835824251175,
0.01892615295946598,
0.012004071846604347,
-0.09020277857780457,
-0.02299753576517105,
-0.032705530524253845,
0.017203595489263535,
0.04526949301362038,
0.027907293289899826,
-0.04737851023674011,
-0.04814774543046951,
-0.09438963979482651,
-0.007390803657472134,
-0.02407984249293804,
-0.06569091230630875,
-0.024817973375320435,
0.00714031420648098,
-0.004051185678690672,
-0.0019620165694504976,
-0.0008881506510078907,
-0.01667669788002968,
-0.04778580740094185,
-0.03747093304991722,
-0.00956907868385315,
0.012650751508772373,
-0.013392259366810322,
-0.05727118253707886,
9.531019133746466e-33,
-0.025228537619113922,
0.03472314029932022,
-0.08180829137563705,
0.04472604766488075,
0.09285597503185272,
0.01072496548295021,
0.05919016897678375,
-0.011756745167076588,
-0.03434612601995468,
-0.015004218555986881,
-0.03923682123422623,
-0.04038259759545326,
-0.03922653570771217,
0.09315347671508789,
0.009381130337715149,
-0.09181076288223267,
0.032811183482408524,
0.04103444516658783,
0.02716188319027424,
-0.014777918346226215,
-0.012295101769268513,
-0.06951387226581573,
-0.08157667517662048,
-0.0944245234131813,
0.026789721101522446,
0.09209843724966049,
0.016620516777038574,
-0.009743639267981052,
0.02627035416662693,
0.0729016661643982,
0.018642637878656387,
0.05717220902442932,
0.0218210332095623,
0.07990055531263351,
-0.019210750237107277,
0.030826106667518616,
-0.005147440358996391,
-0.0636167973279953,
0.005825981497764587,
-0.06352456659078598,
-0.024894360452890396,
0.04490337148308754,
-0.00015629976405762136,
0.03334187716245651,
0.018619956448674202,
-0.07332341372966766,
0.015548079274594784,
0.04187905043363571,
0.11240492016077042,
-0.00025498922332189977,
-0.00037553015863522887,
0.0608365423977375,
-0.035931333899497986,
-0.04187110438942909,
0.07177072763442993,
-0.006726802326738834,
-0.0008350870339199901,
-0.003726651193574071,
0.024320088326931,
0.04812326654791832,
-0.04280342161655426,
0.06168930605053902,
-0.03492758795619011,
-0.0023894389159977436,
-0.008106120862066746,
0.04303485527634621,
-0.07087967544794083,
-0.0182572603225708,
0.03200459107756615,
-0.004795286804437637,
-0.04795611649751663,
-0.05574110522866249,
0.1310880482196808,
0.019095055758953094,
-0.03077659383416176,
0.053871724754571915,
0.01276184432208538,
0.01083116140216589,
-0.08722396194934845,
0.027640553191304207,
-0.07687168568372726,
0.03039451874792576,
0.08393464237451553,
-0.010988627560436726,
0.018885575234889984,
-0.033077068626880646,
0.04847560450434685,
0.08588462322950363,
-0.06120598688721657,
0.0317453071475029,
0.028980661183595657,
-0.0012004587333649397,
-0.03606916964054108,
0.07189628481864929,
-0.04817787930369377,
-7.549970993933142e-33,
0.007726725190877914,
-0.014014743268489838,
-0.04537159577012062,
-0.06039360910654068,
-0.010631216689944267,
0.00900164432823658,
0.05915951356291771,
-0.07706795632839203,
0.06578337401151657,
0.08908651769161224,
-0.05743679776787758,
0.02785579115152359,
-0.020892227068543434,
-0.0806041955947876,
-0.010486006736755371,
0.03979189693927765,
0.04051024466753006,
-0.11617936939001083,
-0.07240612059831619,
0.03108951449394226,
-0.006763981655240059,
0.0720953568816185,
0.0110479099676013,
-0.027214184403419495,
-0.04904225096106529,
0.0616120807826519,
0.04634270444512367,
0.03296696022152901,
0.008210629224777222,
-0.03641413152217865,
-0.08298534899950027,
-0.06303010880947113,
-0.03584861382842064,
0.032774101942777634,
-0.015819961205124855,
-0.06031618267297745,
0.07765676826238632,
0.01247025653719902,
-0.09081980586051941,
-0.04213409498333931,
0.13359159231185913,
-0.11760547757148743,
-0.04546867683529854,
-0.012287150137126446,
0.012651359662413597,
-0.037145666778087616,
0.016085820272564888,
-0.08317972719669342,
0.036741703748703,
-0.029237370938062668,
0.032702233642339706,
-0.0063129598274827,
-0.0717678815126419,
0.12497828155755997,
0.03933091461658478,
0.05053747817873955,
0.10971003025770187,
-0.03585251048207283,
-0.12690432369709015,
-0.025694001466035843,
0.11077408492565155,
0.03806445002555847,
0.09180595725774765,
-0.004211947321891785,
0.06072087585926056,
-0.008082158863544464,
0.03172485530376434,
0.0318012461066246,
-0.011058293282985687,
0.0032913722097873688,
-0.04692952707409859,
-0.027049710974097252,
-0.008537608198821545,
-0.02677053026854992,
0.02150043472647667,
0.02064988948404789,
-0.027241449803113937,
-0.018551060929894447,
-0.06694095581769943,
0.07641040533781052,
-0.04121903330087662,
0.05060990899801254,
-0.07300180941820145,
0.03602689132094383,
0.06820336729288101,
-0.04000777751207352,
0.016334816813468933,
-0.029645122587680817,
0.045505933463573456,
0.041279684752225876,
-0.04776254668831825,
-0.027927355840802193,
-0.019351696595549583,
0.03311798721551895,
-0.025255506858229637,
-5.666646174518064e-8,
-0.06563832610845566,
0.006379078142344952,
0.028951287269592285,
0.02061612717807293,
-0.050043489784002304,
-0.053829289972782135,
0.026252975687384605,
0.02719763107597828,
-0.017633238807320595,
-0.008955756202340126,
0.01846909523010254,
0.022403376176953316,
0.029694147408008575,
0.0749000608921051,
0.06048896163702011,
-0.03882134333252907,
-0.02278703637421131,
-0.024701839312911034,
-0.04494411125779152,
-0.15280048549175262,
-0.01457122340798378,
-0.012570926919579506,
0.009871980175375938,
0.06473396718502045,
0.004844870418310165,
-0.038123078644275665,
0.025282301008701324,
0.021420521661639214,
0.04685642942786217,
0.04428550601005554,
-0.0687621533870697,
-0.022098852321505547,
-0.0071977428160607815,
0.07297325879335403,
0.007120324764400721,
-0.045257970690727234,
-0.011270706541836262,
-0.054299887269735336,
-0.06629933416843414,
0.08516283333301544,
0.060721490532159805,
0.029509156942367554,
-0.011833904311060905,
0.01851736754179001,
0.08093056827783585,
0.04277420789003372,
-0.09016282111406326,
0.007384846918284893,
0.03039047308266163,
0.07228773087263107,
0.06924577057361603,
0.038220975548028946,
-0.016839858144521713,
0.12574097514152527,
0.056291643530130386,
0.0184194203466177,
-0.04766836389899254,
-0.053839944303035736,
0.046986985951662064,
0.1187041848897934,
-0.004584868438541889,
0.012594044208526611,
-0.019077321514487267,
0.003933329600840807
] | {
"pdf_file": "R5O7UJD4YJERUYUP6XKJR6SA6ZJRA4AG.pdf",
"text": "AZCOMAECOM\n1194 Pacific Street\nSuite 204\nSan Luis Obispo CA 93401\nwww.aecom.com805 542 9840\n805 542 9990tel\nfax\nAlelia Parenteau\nEnergy Analyst\nCity of Santa Barbara\n620 Laguna Street\nSanta Barbara, CA 93101\n5/27/10\nBudget Revision Request 2 - El Estero WWTF FOG Pilot Project\nOn February 17, 2010, City Council authorized AECOM to proceed with the design of a pilot Fats Oil\nand Grease (FOG) receiving, handling, and injection station at the El Estero Wastewater Treatment\nPlant (WWTP). Our approved scope includes plans and technical specifications for the site piping,\npumping, storage vessel, and local controls of the receiving and delivery system. We are also\ncontracted to provide limited construction phase support.\nCity staff has requested AECOM to include additional project features and engineering tasks to our\napproved scope of work. The additional scope items requested are:\n1. Design of a containment area surrounding the FOG processing area\n2. Site drain to Cul-de-sac drain\nThrough our discussions with City staff, we have developed the following understanding of the\nrequested modifications to our Scope of Work.\nAdditional Task Item 1 - FOG Containment Facilities\nAECOM will provide construction plans and specifications for a containment wall surrounding\nthe FOG processing area. Preliminary estimates indicate a concrete wall (25' x 25' x 3' high) will\nbe required to contain 150% of the volume of the FOG storage tank. The design will include\nstairs with a handrail to access the containment area, and the containment area will feature\nconcrete flatwork within the entire contained area. Flatwork will be sloped to a sump. The\nsump will be connected to a manually operated valve to allow periodic draining of collected\nwater to the cul-de-sac drain (see item 2 below). As discussed, pumps will be located within the\ncontained area. Truck offload equipment (rock trap, hose connection, etc.) will be located\noutside the containment area. Per Staff request, our design will not feature a roof structure.\nWe have reviewed record drawing information provided by City staff and have not identified any\nconflict with existing utilities in the area of the proposed containment area. We assume that no\nsuch conflicts exist. The construction contractor will be responsible to identify and mitigate any\nconflicts identified during construction.\nAdditional Task Item 2 - Drainage Facilities\nAECOM will provide construction plans and specifications for a gravity drain connection\n(assumed 6 inch) between the proposed containment area and the existing cul-de-sac drain. We\nwill also connect the proposed FOG rock trap to the new drain to facilitate maintenance of the\nscreen. Seal water from the positive displacement pumps will also be directed to the drain.\n ATTACHMENT\n \n1 AICOM\nWe have assumed that adequate fall exists between the proposed containment area and the\nexisting drain, and that no conflicts exist along the alignment. Through discussions with plant\nstaff and our preliminary review of existing record drawings, we assume that the nearby utilities\n(such as the plant outfall line) are adequately deep as to not impact the design of the proposed\ndrain line.\nWe have budgeted 6 hours of time to further review existing as-built drawings to evaluate\nconflicts and determine grade lines such as inverts at the existing cul-de-sac drain. If adequate\ncover does not exist over the proposed drain line, a slurry trench may be recommended.\nAdditional Task Item 3 - Requested Revisions to Existing Work\nTo date AECOM has performed work beyond what was approved in our original scope and\nbudget (e.g. providing a reinforced concrete slab and seismic design, and participating in\nadditional meetings and coordination efforts). We have also evaluated various revisions to the\nscope (additional digester piping, SCADA integration, and drainage improvements), analyzed\npotential impacts to project cost, and provided an opinion of cost for each potential revision.\nAdditionally, upon review of the Preliminary Design Memo (submitted April 28, 2010),\nsignificant modifications to the original scope of the project were requested by City staff. To\nincorporate these requests, AECOM must abandon some work already completed, revise other\nexisting work, and perform new work not anticipated. These tasks include:\n• Revising system layout\n• Recalculating pump system curves\n• Performing additional electrical calculations and layout\n• Performing additional CAD design work\n• Design of additional equipment pedestals\n• Providing technical specs for a different tank and appurtenances,\n• Revising cost opinions\n• Providing additional direction for controlling and programming two duplex pump\nsystems.\nTo accommodate the direction requested by City staff without eroding the approved budget for\nthe remaining work, AECOM is requesting additional budget of $4,277 to incorporate these\nrevisions. As always, work would be performed on a time-and-materials basis and will be billed\nbased on actual work performed.\nAdditional Task Item 4 - Additional Construction Phase Support\nOur approved Scope of Work includes limited construction phase support. We are currently\nauthorized to respond to four (4) RFIs, assist the City with examining bids, attend a pre-construction\nmeeting, and manage submittals. With the additional project components noted above, we are\nrequesting an increase in budget for additional submittal review and RFI response.\nWe are also authorized to be onsite for four (4) hours during the first day of field work, four (4)\nhours during one progress visit during construction, and for four (4) hours for one final visit to\nevaluate the near completed facilities. Our site visits are intended to monitor the overall\n ATTACHMENT\n \n2 AZCOM\nconstruction progress of the project and to address any major deficiencies encountered. Our\napproved scope does not include construction management or construction observation where daily\nactivities are monitored and recorded. We are therefore not requesting additional budget to\nmanage the additional construction activities. If unforeseen site conditions or quality concerns arise\nas construction proceeds, AECOM can perform additional support and site visits on an as-needed\ntime and materials basis to assist with resolving issues and developing solutions in the field. Any\nadditional services would be requested in writing for approval prior to the work being performed.\nAn hourly breakdown of these scope revisions can be seen on the attached worksheet (attached).\nBudget Summary\nExisting Approved Budget\n$64,506Budget Revision Request 2\n$21,859Revised Budget\n$86,365\nPlease sign and return the enclosed copy of this letter, thereby enabling us to perform these\nadditional services on a time and materials basis.\nThank you,City of Santa Barbara\nJoff Hanlon, PESigned:\nDate:\nTitle:\n ATTACHMENT\n \n3 Project Budget\nCity of Santa Barbara El Estero FOG Pilot Program\nBudget Revision 2\nTask Description\nAdditional Task Item 1 - FOG SDIII Containment\nPlans (1 sheet)\nspecs\nstructural engineering\nMisc. details\nSubtotal\nAdditional Task Item 2 - Drainaae Facilities\nrecord drawing review\nPlans (1 sheet)\nSpecs\nSubtotal\nTask Grouo 3 -\nRevisions to Work Already Completed\nSubtotal\nTask Grouo 4 - Additional Construction Phase Services\nRFIs and Bid Addenda\nSubmittal Review and Management\nChange Order Review and Management\nadditional record drawings\nSubtotal\nTotal\nPrincipal\n6\n6\n-\n6Personnel\nManaging Engineer\n1\n1\n2\n4\n2\n2\n4\n4\n4\n2\n4\n2\n8\n20\nAssociate Engineer\n4\n8\n8\n20\n6\n6\n8\n20\n16\n16\n4\n16\n8\n28\n84Hours\nDrafter\n12\n8\n20\n12\n12\n12\n12\n4\n4\n48\nTotal Hours\n17\n9\n6\n18\n50\n6\n20\n10\n36\n32\n32\n6\n20\n10\n4\n40\n158$\n$\n$\n$\n$\ns$$s>\n$\n$\n$\n$\n%\n$\n3>\n$\nLabor\n1,935\n1,175\n1,200\n2,190\n6,500\n750\n2,360\n1,350\n4,460\n3,960\n3,960\n850\n2,700\n1,350\n420\n5^20\n20,240$\n$\n$\n$\n$\n$\n%\n$\n$\n$\nS>\n$\n$\n$\n$\n$\n$Budget\nNon-Labor Fees\nAmounts shown are fee155\n94\n96\n175\n520\n60\n189\n108\n357\n317\n317\n68\n216\n108\n34\n426\n1,619$\n$\n$\n3>\n$\n$\n$\n$\n$\n$\n$\n$\n$\nS\n$\n$\nTotal\n2,090\n1,269\n1,296\n2,365\n7,020\n810\n2,549\n1,458\n4,817\n4,277\n4,277\n918\n2,916\n1,458\n454\n5,746\n21,859\nPersonnel Category\nPrincipal\nManaging Engineer\nAssociate Engineer\nDrafterS/HR\n$200.00\n$175.00\n$125.00\n$105.00\n5/27/2010\n ATTACHMENT\n \n4"
} |
[
-0.11883839964866638,
0.04829868674278259,
-0.0025480559561401606,
-0.011011209338903427,
0.05195074528455734,
0.010291832499206066,
0.1154332384467125,
0.0007007909007370472,
-0.08592535555362701,
-0.07065396010875702,
0.0013317164266481996,
-0.035472381860017776,
0.018434155732393265,
-0.006737178191542625,
0.024402987211942673,
-0.029503243044018745,
-0.058138374239206314,
-0.05043954402208328,
-0.020765526220202446,
0.029036032035946846,
-0.06367600709199905,
0.024029914289712906,
0.0262432973831892,
-0.006037362851202488,
-0.011076544411480427,
-0.0014006864512339234,
-0.018619801849126816,
0.03277004510164261,
0.0028860096354037523,
-0.05694391578435898,
-0.04394163936376572,
0.025414075702428818,
0.08790954202413559,
-0.02499123103916645,
-0.03668315336108208,
0.0062413448467850685,
-0.06646791845560074,
-0.0671444833278656,
0.020564241334795952,
0.04238877445459366,
0.021880215033888817,
-0.04288247600197792,
-0.03437700495123863,
0.06146686151623726,
0.0656372681260109,
-0.0785202905535698,
0.029487011954188347,
0.010798297822475433,
0.06332410126924515,
-0.04508465901017189,
-0.01823394186794758,
-0.027721041813492775,
-0.0036737609189003706,
-0.03659451752901077,
0.054250262677669525,
-0.02085655927658081,
0.015034922398626804,
-0.060095224529504776,
0.016393909230828285,
-0.03323858231306076,
0.01750349812209606,
-0.0005952207720838487,
-0.16348379850387573,
0.08492093533277512,
-0.07583844661712646,
0.0161097701638937,
0.048382941633462906,
-0.007598146330565214,
-0.024985475465655327,
0.05949747934937477,
0.0658901110291481,
-0.03513742983341217,
0.0008843158720992506,
-0.11567969620227814,
0.049390342086553574,
0.03360460326075554,
0.055154237896203995,
0.026383694261312485,
0.053694359958171844,
0.038932498544454575,
0.0004393816343508661,
0.0180604699999094,
-0.09288253635168076,
-0.004073987249284983,
-0.0008234609267674387,
-0.04883106052875519,
-0.006677441764622927,
-0.023541681468486786,
-0.03813307359814644,
0.05245159938931465,
-0.042493823915719986,
-0.055899728089571,
0.08681583404541016,
-0.04896170645952225,
-0.08339672535657883,
-0.0457635223865509,
0.029042238369584084,
0.03465776517987251,
-0.08649188280105591,
0.4062184691429138,
0.03594949096441269,
0.018697189167141914,
0.0979783833026886,
-0.007865204475820065,
0.023714108392596245,
-0.05756505951285362,
-0.06109985336661339,
-0.006620500702410936,
0.007060033269226551,
0.021669859066605568,
-0.024405108764767647,
-0.033514637500047684,
0.00025015627034008503,
0.03170765936374664,
0.04407161846756935,
0.09463243186473846,
-0.035580113530159,
-0.0045343064703047276,
0.043714847415685654,
0.00020504710846580565,
-0.002858717693015933,
-0.024884076789021492,
0.0037606365513056517,
0.014041258953511715,
0.07781578600406647,
-0.1323145031929016,
0.0068764761090278625,
-7.2201250750405e-33,
0.007334581576287746,
0.002726183971390128,
0.012147537432610989,
-0.002440247917547822,
0.027932560071349144,
0.03927065059542656,
0.003743888111785054,
-0.04643532633781433,
-0.014492551796138287,
0.05360198765993118,
0.006590632256120443,
0.03664784133434296,
-0.023135676980018616,
0.03275369852781296,
0.07811082899570465,
0.009627518244087696,
0.007964123040437698,
0.0028742437716573477,
-0.0018807238666340709,
0.004691542126238346,
-0.012402275577187538,
-0.0008041393011808395,
-0.023038707673549652,
0.04297299310564995,
-0.028259985148906708,
-0.06694644689559937,
0.038539037108421326,
-0.07085712999105453,
0.020109260454773903,
0.001460324041545391,
0.0014639950823038816,
0.049912355840206146,
-0.02594558522105217,
0.0008223677286878228,
-0.03757276013493538,
-0.028740663081407547,
0.03337514027953148,
-0.07462829351425171,
-0.035983964800834656,
0.025680823251605034,
-0.050139084458351135,
0.010837196372449398,
-0.04243791848421097,
-0.002668545348569751,
-0.004916265141218901,
0.16647927463054657,
-0.0011541391722857952,
-0.004960660357028246,
-0.06482207775115967,
0.06976216286420822,
-0.0028182310052216053,
-0.02132517658174038,
-0.11613703519105911,
0.04333868995308876,
-0.0033509607892483473,
-0.020106570795178413,
0.016554009169340134,
-0.043971188366413116,
0.020619438961148262,
-0.009089959785342216,
0.009713641367852688,
0.039391469210386276,
-0.012487754225730896,
0.009350251406431198,
-0.08647788316011429,
-0.04851773753762245,
0.02447775937616825,
-0.008494960144162178,
0.023063570261001587,
-0.012638214975595474,
-0.05100997909903526,
0.03675990551710129,
0.03771744668483734,
0.030916057527065277,
-0.028798431158065796,
-0.01926880143582821,
-0.019831717014312744,
0.03583517670631409,
0.08063048869371414,
0.00649732630699873,
0.03545527532696724,
-0.041958946734666824,
0.006693818140774965,
-0.024078864604234695,
0.09502369910478592,
0.054634999483823776,
0.004220988135784864,
-0.05180729925632477,
0.01021517813205719,
-0.041098661720752716,
-0.03574559465050697,
0.06131820008158684,
-0.0030944310128688812,
0.08796171098947525,
0.006000818684697151,
4.4925641867161134e-33,
-0.07716735452413559,
0.01899317093193531,
-0.03573813661932945,
0.0887979194521904,
-0.01755509153008461,
-0.0027626880910247564,
0.037273939698934555,
0.09013677388429642,
-0.09250447154045105,
0.0680299699306488,
0.022390201687812805,
-0.045089662075042725,
0.030878892168402672,
0.044495198875665665,
-0.005799654871225357,
0.03523358702659607,
0.06968843936920166,
-0.004063474480062723,
-0.028155116364359856,
-0.03572935611009598,
-0.030507177114486694,
-0.03237851336598396,
-0.0024998304434120655,
0.034929435700178146,
-0.04148077219724655,
0.030205287039279938,
0.04858911409974098,
0.0632987916469574,
-0.021693143993616104,
0.036800533533096313,
0.03896567225456238,
-0.023581488057971,
-0.05063262954354286,
-0.05820295587182045,
0.04826247692108154,
0.08404397964477539,
0.03678114339709282,
-0.0007768925279378891,
0.024848245084285736,
-0.05051735043525696,
0.039668887853622437,
-0.010082785040140152,
0.002244437113404274,
0.11697717010974884,
-0.021961307153105736,
-0.005805923603475094,
-0.048092879354953766,
0.003788944333791733,
0.035172659903764725,
0.07729728519916534,
-0.09319712221622467,
-0.011992926709353924,
-0.021968109533190727,
0.04129430651664734,
-0.022958293557167053,
0.004160518292337656,
-0.0432187058031559,
0.0702132061123848,
-0.01905948668718338,
0.0004752702370751649,
0.005480603780597448,
0.026761434972286224,
-0.033612821251153946,
0.01346849836409092,
-0.022746674716472626,
0.03873894736170769,
-0.024523282423615456,
-0.03632815554738045,
-0.0017924589337781072,
-0.052569907158613205,
0.006689464673399925,
-0.025846485048532486,
-0.1348353624343872,
0.0011394252069294453,
-0.047169335186481476,
-0.05347497761249542,
-0.018427148461341858,
-0.007304163184016943,
-0.009657083079218864,
-0.037726134061813354,
-0.033999841660261154,
0.01841733604669571,
-0.008003143593668938,
-0.005512353032827377,
-0.03353199362754822,
-0.0201805979013443,
0.021665804088115692,
0.01075822301208973,
-0.05747472122311592,
0.01969684660434723,
-0.007240809965878725,
0.023037107661366463,
0.12023406475782394,
0.0032419958151876926,
0.010150063782930374,
-1.3403668397415913e-8,
-0.046724583953619,
0.04062063992023468,
-0.05561641603708267,
-0.0018853341462090611,
0.056323979049921036,
0.049638908356428146,
-0.04154156893491745,
0.0325038842856884,
0.02574923262000084,
-0.018780937418341637,
0.06920813769102097,
0.02598794549703598,
-0.02782331220805645,
0.05757509544491768,
0.09128093719482422,
-0.01532574463635683,
-0.10472093522548676,
-0.027585938572883606,
-0.016222817823290825,
-0.035399287939071655,
-0.010461363941431046,
-0.013999390415847301,
-0.0002939800324384123,
-0.08362972736358643,
0.007932317443192005,
0.006960071157664061,
-0.04422977939248085,
0.07475824654102325,
0.07440952211618423,
-0.04058071970939636,
-0.0018266832921653986,
0.01985001191496849,
0.014382191933691502,
0.020585300400853157,
0.02213379554450512,
-0.06437048316001892,
-0.06369856745004654,
0.01613914780318737,
0.009907381609082222,
-0.0055595203302800655,
-0.05467313155531883,
-0.0233115516602993,
0.07046928256750107,
0.006468005012720823,
-0.047700025141239166,
-0.0036470729392021894,
0.007837599143385887,
-0.004974569659680128,
-0.01241857185959816,
-0.07781214267015457,
-0.0009409073390997946,
-0.008002524264156818,
0.006034235469996929,
0.08434933423995972,
0.10730371624231339,
0.011427774094045162,
0.013366665691137314,
-0.012747352942824364,
0.061454374343156815,
0.03564131259918213,
0.1587459295988083,
0.12640950083732605,
0.04654904082417488,
-0.015717294067144394
] | {
"pdf_file": "5JEF6INEQSUEH2KKAOO5NNONLBEXWTXI.pdf",
"text": ""
} |
[
-0.06705514341592789,
-0.047445327043533325,
0.023963946849107742,
-0.05120516195893288,
0.08144127577543259,
-0.05602716654539108,
-0.026346657425165176,
-0.027372261509299278,
-0.07588990032672882,
-0.05363484472036362,
0.00426800362765789,
0.05107419565320015,
-0.018559031188488007,
0.04522266611456871,
-0.04391781613230705,
0.01776961050927639,
0.022802388295531273,
-0.026059504598379135,
-0.03705765679478645,
0.08126777410507202,
0.12586158514022827,
0.01436341181397438,
-0.14984756708145142,
0.03680243715643883,
-0.0701117217540741,
0.027745256200432777,
-0.007551220711320639,
0.05454619601368904,
-0.017833763733506203,
-0.025987796485424042,
0.008201519958674908,
0.00656854035332799,
0.0155686866492033,
-0.06767208129167557,
0.06304340064525604,
0.08749284595251083,
0.006988344248384237,
-0.00504432525485754,
0.021566001698374748,
0.031002983450889587,
-0.038261111825704575,
-0.05741092190146446,
0.008535312488675117,
0.08894132822751999,
-0.02070305496454239,
0.005367783829569817,
-0.06569467484951019,
-0.05492743104696274,
0.016703423112630844,
-0.04280178248882294,
0.03412240371108055,
0.034165944904088974,
0.004747358150780201,
-0.037016212940216064,
-0.03469722718000412,
0.007883372716605663,
-0.055945850908756256,
-0.024761062115430832,
-0.030364902690052986,
0.0044931513257324696,
0.07487155497074127,
-0.03973683714866638,
-0.08789277821779251,
-0.005082254763692617,
0.0165335014462471,
-0.021224984899163246,
-0.07782250642776489,
-0.0018163832137361169,
0.07799225300550461,
-0.021103138104081154,
0.03861868008971214,
-0.005266016814857721,
-0.012944831512868404,
-0.014738397672772408,
0.0054696532897651196,
-0.0020239977166056633,
-0.006280164700001478,
0.051679808646440506,
0.03660888224840164,
-0.03820459917187691,
0.019166836515069008,
0.03673325106501579,
0.002603482222184539,
-0.019247911870479584,
0.027084283530712128,
0.002843943890184164,
0.0015164250507950783,
-0.02912597917020321,
0.10216877609491348,
0.04292111471295357,
0.04072693735361099,
0.03943214565515518,
-0.01687975414097309,
-0.10673991590738297,
-0.005170856602489948,
0.11108822375535965,
-0.0348697192966938,
-0.041338205337524414,
-0.0049891057424247265,
0.03869844600558281,
-0.008940671570599079,
0.056175120174884796,
-0.0643475353717804,
-0.11093370616436005,
0.0829358845949173,
-0.025618506595492363,
0.008284283801913261,
0.07265730947256088,
0.0698176920413971,
0.0377255454659462,
-0.005993150640279055,
0.041414134204387665,
0.04740089550614357,
0.005782262422144413,
-0.03812578693032265,
0.06770890951156616,
-0.012098737061023712,
-0.01357519906014204,
0.0034412250388413668,
-0.066631980240345,
-0.03239351511001587,
-0.020118355751037598,
0.0008933309582062066,
-0.04208580404520035,
0.06460177898406982,
0.0884459987282753,
-0.00831564050167799,
3.6266759461172156e-33,
-0.014693256467580795,
-0.07472554594278336,
-0.020583858713507652,
-0.017939895391464233,
0.02233593724668026,
-0.030435195192694664,
-0.013436941429972649,
-0.020658448338508606,
0.004909052047878504,
0.03257019817829132,
0.012227310799062252,
-0.04645318165421486,
-0.1024857759475708,
-0.02780790627002716,
0.028670109808444977,
-0.04258241131901741,
0.0672287717461586,
-0.046979472041130066,
-0.05748726427555084,
-0.04507207125425339,
0.042614132165908813,
-0.04006880894303322,
-0.047391701489686966,
-0.08749683201313019,
-0.0796114131808281,
-0.05721080303192139,
0.0030178322922438383,
-0.028737764805555344,
0.05036960542201996,
0.05171135812997818,
0.08328922092914581,
-0.008063141256570816,
0.00848248042166233,
0.028203951194882393,
0.020520489662885666,
0.006935756653547287,
-0.002020640764385462,
0.01723470352590084,
0.0058801486156880856,
-0.00849620345979929,
-0.0352015495300293,
0.03247062489390373,
0.012585237622261047,
0.0880076214671135,
-0.011814519762992859,
-0.05215538293123245,
-0.0011573531664907932,
0.04481102153658867,
0.07512350380420685,
0.04626089334487915,
0.019467508420348167,
-0.024988921359181404,
-0.0930904746055603,
-0.03213545307517052,
-0.00892084650695324,
-0.04793233796954155,
-0.0198565274477005,
-0.0012978335143998265,
-0.03121647611260414,
-0.0069201635196805,
-0.05388848856091499,
0.04467708244919777,
-0.01709052175283432,
0.04707496240735054,
0.07925153523683548,
-0.021883057430386543,
0.017968149855732918,
-0.0251365527510643,
0.10648352652788162,
-0.105049729347229,
-0.05144757404923439,
-0.04555020108819008,
-0.0594402439892292,
0.033527325838804245,
-0.05524597689509392,
-0.0650092139840126,
0.10203544795513153,
0.039370179176330566,
0.04818602651357651,
0.041066717356443405,
-0.059049300849437714,
0.01106246281415224,
-0.06529944390058517,
0.07236305624246597,
-0.04584566876292229,
-0.03262217715382576,
-0.012121163308620453,
-0.013601466082036495,
0.03135010600090027,
-0.04696691036224365,
0.03834635391831398,
-0.040580395609140396,
-0.010474174283444881,
-0.0018397554522380233,
0.0006663869717158377,
-3.699387618555267e-33,
0.04338940978050232,
-0.04781709238886833,
0.03162042424082756,
-0.014062526635825634,
0.0046373577788472176,
0.008399971760809422,
0.029227769002318382,
-0.021294869482517242,
0.013660709373652935,
-0.003949766047298908,
-0.09449072182178497,
0.05614924058318138,
0.015204280614852905,
0.04181819409132004,
-0.024422233924269676,
0.04109945893287659,
0.023037301376461983,
-0.00021864984591957182,
-0.09902999550104141,
0.01591615006327629,
0.0012075179256498814,
0.10192080587148666,
0.10527398437261581,
0.08804529905319214,
0.0025164862163364887,
0.011884964071214199,
-0.02450442872941494,
0.016865083947777748,
0.008292844519019127,
-0.016506504267454147,
0.015412299893796444,
0.05124810338020325,
0.025611190125346184,
0.06563415378332138,
-0.12375003844499588,
-0.09352146089076996,
0.04039572924375534,
0.009098905138671398,
-0.08250531554222107,
0.0054225921630859375,
0.16373033821582794,
-0.08052334934473038,
-0.03326579928398132,
0.05466300994157791,
-0.03186371177434921,
0.02349761873483658,
0.04187070205807686,
-0.06522969901561737,
0.008095242083072662,
0.05501757934689522,
-0.03935415297746658,
-0.034532513469457626,
0.007141794543713331,
0.09185422211885452,
0.028092650696635246,
-0.06076014041900635,
0.05534473434090614,
0.0006491516251116991,
-0.08324266225099564,
0.04483427479863167,
0.11143971979618073,
0.08121699094772339,
-0.11430904269218445,
0.05291185900568962,
0.07436688989400864,
0.04194347932934761,
0.005315272603183985,
0.04243037477135658,
-0.03936876729130745,
-0.09722239524126053,
-0.08693048357963562,
-0.047239840030670166,
0.042447056621313095,
-0.07052948325872421,
-0.005717021878808737,
-0.09881418198347092,
-0.06527715921401978,
-0.04210369661450386,
-0.08309515565633774,
0.008920075371861458,
-0.052428875118494034,
0.04236239194869995,
-0.09594535082578659,
0.026216454803943634,
0.08190805464982986,
-0.026915963739156723,
0.034508273005485535,
-0.026935353875160217,
0.07391820102930069,
0.05489007383584976,
-0.013524021953344345,
0.018192991614341736,
-0.07352663576602936,
0.09315434098243713,
0.03680916875600815,
-4.984382684369848e-8,
-0.0315728560090065,
0.025041261687874794,
0.007858754135668278,
0.013906892389059067,
-0.046930789947509766,
-0.0041777342557907104,
0.043278615921735764,
0.04473860189318657,
-0.04325041174888611,
0.018621062859892845,
-0.061679963022470474,
0.001734372926875949,
-0.0381317213177681,
-0.0442846342921257,
0.023539403453469276,
-0.015349739231169224,
0.0963825136423111,
0.05088929831981659,
-0.0750705897808075,
-0.016998805105686188,
-0.01589334011077881,
-0.07870133966207504,
-0.019218459725379944,
0.10061417520046234,
-0.0681353434920311,
-0.007608899846673012,
0.06204310432076454,
0.09336055815219879,
0.08714820444583893,
-0.027202744036912918,
0.03806830942630768,
0.03204372152686119,
0.06759540736675262,
0.11142593622207642,
-0.025625430047512054,
0.021595507860183716,
-0.050430260598659515,
0.0029564942233264446,
-0.00016559124924242496,
0.08716405928134918,
-0.13958944380283356,
0.03632185235619545,
-0.05605694279074669,
0.013076241128146648,
-0.0025249470490962267,
0.06300380080938339,
-0.06911998242139816,
0.09112996608018875,
0.07176628708839417,
0.0402006134390831,
-0.004105623811483383,
-0.05009946972131729,
0.052314482629299164,
0.014349660836160183,
0.00034521802444942296,
0.07717117667198181,
-0.02613893337547779,
0.017502808943390846,
-0.034899625927209854,
0.013378070667386055,
0.021473266184329987,
0.009314659982919693,
0.0038621400017291307,
-0.01919689029455185
] | {
"pdf_file": "AVFIBOSLNYG5BBP2JOV3MOBAFZDYN7DP.pdf",
"text": "STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS \nDEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT \nADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION DIVISION \n \nRE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \n \nDECISION AND ORDER \n \nI. Background \n On November 29, 2002, the Office of Water Resources (“OWR”) issued, as a \nfinal permit, RIPDES RI 0023558 (“Permit”)1 to the Sakonnet Point Club, Inc. (“SPC”). \nThe SPC proposes to build a multi-purpose yacht club and marina on Bluff Head \nAvenue in Little Compton, Rhode Island. The Permit regulates discharge from a \nreverse osmosis treatment system designed to desalinize well water and thereby \nprovide potable freshwater to service the needs of SPC. The source of the brackish water to be desalinized is from three deep bedrock wells on the property. The Permit \nwill allow the discharge of concentrated brackish groundwater from the reverse \nosmosis treatment system that consists of pre-filtration, reverse osmosis and ultraviolet \ndisinfection. No discharge of chemicals used in cleaning or sanitizing the pretreatment \nof feed water or coagulation treatment is allowed under the permit. The maximum daily \ndischarge permitted is three thousand (3,000) gallons per day. The discharge will exit through a pipe and diffuser into the Sakonnet River. \n From July 17, 2002 to August 20, 2002, OWR solicited public comment on the draft permit. Mary W. Johnson and John D. Karlsson (“Petitioners”) submitted \nnumerous comments and raised several issues during this phase of the permit \nprocess. Issuance of the Permit was accompanied by a response to public comments \n \n1 Under the Clean Water Act, discharges into the waters of the United States by point sources such as the \nSakonnet Point Club, Inc. must be authorized by a permit. The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination \nSystem (NPDES) is the principal permitting program of the Clean Water Act. By delegation from the \nfederal Environmental Protection Agency, Rhode Island is authorized to issue pollutant discharge permits \npursuant to its Rhode Island Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (RIPDES) permitting program. EPA RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 2 \n and the procedure for appeal of the decision. Petitioners filed separate requests for \nreview of the issuance of the Permit. A prehearing conference was conducted on February 21, 2003 and a Prehearing Conference Record and Order was issued on \nMarch 19, 2003. The Prehearing Conference Record identified stipulations of fact, \nwitnesses and exhibits offered by the parties. Petitioners were required, pursuant to the \nPrehearing Order and Rule 49 of the RIPDES Regulations, to identify each legal or \nfactual issue in dispute. Stated generally, those issues, which are the basis of this \nhearing, are as follows: \n1. Did OWR fail to meet the requirements of RIPDES Regulation \n11.02(a)(14)(i)(A) in issuing this permit? \n \n2. Did OWR fail to meet the requirements of the Rhode Island Water \nQuality Regulations 8.D.(1).(f) and (g) in issuing the permit? \n \n3. Did OWR fail to meet the antidegradation requirements set forth in Rule \n18 and the Antidegradation Implementation Policy of Appendix C of the \nWater Quality Regulations? \n \n The burden is on Petitioners to prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that \nthe disputed sections of the Permit fail to meet the requirements of the Rhode Island \nPollutant Discharge Elimination System (“RIPDES”) Regulations and Water Quality Regulations (“WQR”) (collectively referred to as “Regulations”). The parties agreed on \nseveral stipulations of fact which are set forth below. \nStipulations of Fact \n1. Said permit establishes a discharge flow limit of 3,000 gallons per day. \n2. The permit will allow the discharge of concentrated brackish groundwater from \na reverse osmosis treatment system used to desalinate on-site groundwater \nwells as the source for a public drinking water supply. \n \n3. The groundwater is to be desalinated using a treatment system that consists of \npre-filtration, reverse osmosis, and ultraviolet disinfection. \n \n \n \nhas ceased issuing permits to sources discharging to navigable waters subject to Rhode Island’s \njurisdiction ( See 33 U.S.C. § 1342(c)(1)), but maintains oversi ght responsibilities for state-issued permits. RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 3 \n4. No discharge of chemicals used in cleaning or sanitizing the pretreatment of \nfeed water or coagulation treatment are [sic] allowed under the permit. \n \n5. Copper, arsenic and nickel were the only metals identified as being present in a \nconcentration above the laboratory detection limit in the groundwater, and new discharges from desalination facilities to Class SA waters are allowed in \naccordance with the Rhode Island Water Quality Regulations, Rule 9.E(2)(k). \n \n6. Sakonnet Point Club, Inc. proposes to build a multi-purpose yacht club and \nmarina on Bluff Head Avenue in Little Compton, Rhode Island, and proposes to \nuse reverse osmosis treatment system for the potable fresh water needs of the \nclub. \n \n7. The source of the brackish water to be desalinated are from three, deep \nbedrock wells. \n \n8. The concentrated brackish water from the reverse osmosis treatment system is \nproposed to be discharged by pipe and diffuser into the Sakonnet River. \n \n9. Employees of the Office of Water Resources, Department of Environmental \nManagement, received an application for a RIPDES permit on August 4, 2000 \nand determined the application complete on October 3, 2001. \n \n10. OWR issued a draft permit RIPDES Number RI0023558 on July 1, 2002. \n \n11. OWR opened a public comment period for the draft permit, RIPDES Number \nRI0023558 from July 17, 2002 to August 20, 2002. \n \n12. On August 19, 2002, OWR held a public hearing on draft permit, RIPDES \nRI0023558, at which Petitioners submitted oral and written comments. \n \n13. On November 29, 2002, OWR issued RIPDES RI0023558 as a final permit, \naccompanied by a response to public comm ents and notification that “a formal \nhearing could be requested within 30 days of the receipt of this letter”. \n \n14. On December 31, 2002, John Karlsson delivered a request for an adjudicative \nhearing to the Office of Administrative Adjudication and to the office of Kelly Sheridan, Counsel for the Applicant. \n \n15. On January 5, 2003, Eric Beck sent a response to comments and for a request \nfor this formal hearing to Petitioner, John Karlsson. \n \n16. On January 6, 2003, Petitioner, Mary W. Johnson, delivered her request for \nformal hearing dated January 5, 2003, to the Office of Administrative \nAdjudication and Kelly Sheridan. \n \n The administrative hearing commenced on March 24, 2003. The Petitioners \nproceeded pro se ; Gregory Schultz, Esq. represented the Office of Water Resources of \nthe Department of Environmental Management and; R. Kelly Sheridan represented the RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 4 \nApplicant, SPC. The hearing was held pursuant to the Rhode Island Administrative \nProcedures Act, R.I. GEN. LAWS §42-35-1 et seq. and the Rules of Practice and \nProcedure for the Administrative Adjudication Division for Environmental Matters. After \nseveral days of testimony the final witness concluded on April 11, 2003. Witnesses \ncalled by Petitioners were Dr. Diane Cowan, Mary Johnson (Petitioner), John Karlsson \n(Petitioner), Angelo Liberti, Chris Powell and Thomas Angell. OWR’s witnesses were \nAngelo Liberti, Mark Gibson, Thomas Angell and Christopher Powell. Testifying on \nbehalf of Applicant were Todd Chaplin and Dr. Deborah French McCay. A briefing \nschedule was set and final reply briefs were filed on June 6, 2003. The hearing was \ndeemed closed as of that date. All documentary and testimonial evidence was considered and weighed. Witness testimony is discussed as needed in subsequent \nsections of this Decision and Order. \n Before proceeding further, I will address Applicant’s oral motion, joined in by \nOWR and made at the close of Petitioners’ case, that judgment as a matter of law be \ngranted in Applicant’s favor. Petitioners objected, argument was heard and I reserved \nruling on the motion until this decision was rendered. Applicant analogized the motion to Super.R.Civ.P. Rule 50 (a)(1) wherein a hearing justice presiding over a jury trial \nmay grant a party's motion for judgment as a matter of law after \"a party has been fully \nheard on an issue and there is no legally su fficient evidentiary basis for a reasonable \njury to find for that party on that issue.\" Counsel argued that Petitioners failed to \nestablish a prima facie case and the\n Applicant and OWR were entitled to judgment as \na matter of law. \nIn considering this motion, I am required to \"consider[s] the evidence in the light \nmost favorable to the nonmoving party, without weighing the evidence or evaluating the credibility of witnesses, and draw[s] from the record all reasonable inferences that \nsupport the position of the nonmoving party. * * * If, after such a review, there remain RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 5 \nfactual issues upon which reasonable persons might draw different conclusions, the \nmotion for [judgment as a matter of law] must be denied, and the issues must be \nsubmitted to the jury for determination.\" Mills v. State Sales, Inc. , 824 A.2d 461, 472 \n(citations omitted). In applying that standard, I find that Petitioners introduced sufficient \nevidence on the issue of habitat that required the weighing of testimony and findings of fact. Although these issues are ultimately decided in favor of Applicant and OWR, the \nMotion for Judgment as a Matter of Law is denied. \n \nII. Did the Office of Water Resources fail to comply with RIPDES Regulations \n11.02(a)(14)(i)(A) by not requiring Applicant to report certain quantitative \ndata? \n \n RIPDES Regulation 11.02(a)(14)(i)(A) provides: \n \n (i) (A) Every applicant must report quantitative data for every outfall for \n the following pollutants: \n \n(1) Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD); \n \n(2) Chemical Oxygen Demand \n \n(3) Total Organic Carbon; \n \n(4) Total Suspended Solids and Total Dissolved Solids; \n \n(5) Ammonia (as N); \n \n(6) Temperature (both winter and summer); and \n \n(7) pH \n \n Petitioners contend that OWR abused its discretion or otherwise failed to abide \nby its own Regulations by not requiring t he Applicant to submit the above-referenced \npollutant data.2 They contend that OWR should have required a more detailed \ncharacterization of the source (well) water. \n Mr. Todd Chaplin, a licensed engineer in the state of Rhode Island and \n \n2 This issue was also raised in Petitioners’ comments during the permitting process and was addressed by \nOWR in its Response to Public Comments, OWR 3 at 5. RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 6 \nCommonwealth of Massachusetts testified on Applicant’s behalf. He holds a Masters \nDegree in environmental and civil engineering from the University of Rhode Island. He currently serves as President of Mount Hope Engineering, the engineering firm that \ndesigned the desalinization unit for SPC. Mr. Chaplin testified that well water sampling was done on each of the wells supplying water to the SPC. Mr. Chaplin characterized \nthe results as consistent with fairly deep bedrock wells in the Little Compton area. The \nresults of the laboratory tests indicated that drinking water standards were met for all \nparameters tested but for the salinity of the water. \n Under cross-examination by Petitioners, Mr. Chaplin acknowledged that the water samples were not tested for the presence of all possible pollutants. Instead, the samples were evaluated for the typical water quality parameters that would be sampled \nfor in a private or public well and that are standard in the public water supply industry. \n Angelo Liberti was called to testify by Petitioners and OWR. He serves as the \nChief of the Surface Water Protection Programs in the Office of Water Resources. His \npertinent experience includes oversight of the RIPDES Permitting Program, \ndesignation of water quality criteria for Rhode Island, determining if the state’s water bodies are in compliance with water quality standards and implementing corrective \nactions for those water bodies which are not in compliance with state standards. Mr. \nLiberti was qualified by agreement as an expert in civil environmental engineering, \nwater quality, hydrodynamic modeling, fate and transport of pollutants and the \napplication of RIPDES and Water Quality Regulations. \n In order to determine which pollutants may be present in the discharge at levels \nlikely to cause a violation of water quality criteria, Mr. Liberti testified that OWR had \nrequired testing beyond the first round of testing performed by Applicant. OWR required sampling for several additional metals that are either metals of concern or are \ntypically found in the area. According to Mr. Liberti, this augmented sampling was RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 7 \nspecifically targeted at the water quality concerns for aquatic life. \n OWR waived the reporting requirements for the pollutants identified in \n11.02(a)(14)(i)(A) pursuant to RIPDES Regulations Rule 11.02(a)(14)(i)B which reads: \n(B) At the applicant’s request, the Department may waive the reporting \nrequirements for one or more of the pollutants listed in paragraph \n(a)(14)(i)(A) of this section. \n \nEach pollutant and the basis for OWR’s decision are addressed below. \n \n \nBiochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) \nand Total Organic Carbons (TOC) \n \n OWR determined that there is no reasonable potential for significant amounts of \nthese pollutants to be present in the well water, therefore a waiver was granted. OWR based this conclusion on its general knowledge of the area and consultation with \nDEM’s Office of Waste Management concerning any known or potential contamination \nof groundwater in the area. Mr. Chaplin also addressed these constituents in his \ntestimony. BOD, COD and TOC are pollutants that one may expect to find in \nwastewater treatment or raw wastewater discharges. Typically in groundwater he \nwould expect them to be extremely low, if pr esent at all. He indicated that in his \nexperience, he has never tested deep- water wells for the presence of BOD, COD and \n(with one inapplicable exception) TOC. \n With regard to dissolved oxygen levels, OWR performed a worst-case scenario calculation assuming a dissolved oxygen level of zero in the discharge and an oxygen \nlevel of seven in the receiving waters (based on information supplied by the Narragansett Bay Project). Within eight (8) feet of the discharge, the calculation \nresulted in a 0.04 milligram per liter change in the dissolved oxygen level of the \nreceiving waters. Based on this analysis, and the conclusion that the discharge will cause less than a 1% change in dissolved oxygen levels at the edge of the mixing \nzone, OWR concluded that there was no reasonable potential to violate water quality RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 8 \ncriteria for dissolved oxygen and a waiver was granted. \nTotal Suspended Solids (TSS) and Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) \n OWR reviewed the reasonable potential of total suspended solids in the \ndischarge to cause a violation of the water quality criteria. OWR performed a mass \nbalance to evaluate the impact of the effluent on receiving waters. Using the TDS discharge as indicated in the application and the typical TDS concentration found in \nseawater, there is an in-stream change of less than 1% at the edge of the mixing \nzones. Based on this analysis, OWR concluded that the discharge does not have a \nreasonable potential to violate water quality criteria for TDS discharges. (OWR 3 at 12). \n OWR waived the quantitative data-reporting requirement for total suspended \nsolids. As grounds for this decision, OWR cites the fact that the source water is well \nwater, which will be processed through a 25m prefilter. Due to this prefiltration of the \nsource water, OWR concluded that there will be no measurable levels of TSS in the discharge. Accordingly, OWR determined that the discharge has no reasonable \npotential to cause a violation of water quality criteria due to excessive total suspended \nsolids in the discharge. \nAmmonia \n \n With respect to ammonia, Mr. Liberti again testified that OWR determined that \nthe discharge did not have a reasonable potential to violate water quality criteria for this \nconstituent. As such, OWR did not require the Applicant to submit pollutant data for \nammonia. \nTemperature \n With respect to monitoring the temperature of the discharge, OWR determined that the discharge does not have a reasonable potential to cause an exceedance of the in-stream temperature water quality criteria and monitoring for this criteria was waived. \nAs the basis for this waiver, OWR performed a heat balance analysis using RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 9 \ntemperature extremes of 32°F for the receiving water and 212°F for the discharge. The \nresult of this heat balance analysis indicates an in-stream change of 1°F in the acute zone (7.9’ radius) and .04 at a radius of 450´. Based on this analysis, OWR concluded \nthat the discharge has no reasonable potential to cause an exceedance of the water \nquality criteria, of a maximum temperature change of 1.6°F, at the boundary of the \nmixing zone. \n Dr. Deborah French McCay testified on behalf of the Applicant. Dr. McCay \nholds an A.B in Zoology from Rutgers College and a Ph.D. in Biological Oceanography \nfrom the Graduate School of Oceanography of the University of Rhode Island. She \nwas qualified as an expert in pollutant fates and effects. Her expertise concerns how pollutants are transported and interact in the environment and where those pollutants \nultimately settle in an environment. She has studied toxicity and other effects that \npollutants might have on organisms exposed to such pollutants including risk \nassessment and impact assessment. Dr. McCay also performed a temperature \nanalysis assuming an effluent temperature of eleven degrees Centigrade (11°C), a \nwinter Sakonnet River temperature of two degrees Centigrade (2°C) and a summer temperature of twenty-two degrees Centigr ade (22°C). She performed a dilution \ncalculation and determined that at the edge of the mixing zone, the winter temperature would be 2.1° C and the summer temperature would be 21.87°C. She concluded that \nin either season, the temperature change at the edge of the mixing zone would be \ninsignificant. \npH \n \n In assessing whether applicant must report quantitative data for pH at the outflow, OWR determined that due to rapid mixing of the effluent as well as a high dilution rate, there is no reasonable potential to cause unacceptable toxicity in the \nreceiving waters. Dr. McCay indicated in her testimony that she performed dilution RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 10 \ncalculations for pH. The pH of the effluent will be 7.4; the pH of the Sakonnet River is \n8. Using a dilution factor of 82 (the most conservative – assuming slack tide), the pH at the edge of the mixing zone would be 7.99. She characterized the change in pH as \nnot even measurable. As a matter of practice, final permit limits for pH (daily and \nmonthly) were established and are reflecte d in the Permit Development Document \n(OWR 4). \n Based on the foregoing discussion, I find that the constituents referenced above do not have a reasonable potential to cause an exceedance of water quality criteria. \nPetitioners failed to prove that OWR did not comply with RIPDES Regulation \n11.02(a)(14)(i)(A). \n \nIII. Did OWR fail to meet the requirements of the Rhode Island Water Quality \nRegulations 8.D.(1).(f) and (g) in issuing this Permit?\n \nWater Quality Regulation 8.D.(1).(f) \n \n WQR 8.D.(1).(f) allows the Director to recognize a mixing zone at the discharge \nsite on a case-by-case basis. The mixing zone must meet the minimum conditions set \nforth in WQR 8.D.(1).(f) which sets the minimum narrative criteria for a mixing zone, including its size, shape and dimension. The Rule provides: \n(f). Non-thermal Mixing Zones - In the case of non-thermal discharges, in \napplying these standards the Director may recognize, where appropriate, a limited acute and/or chronic mixing zone(s) on a case-by-case basis. The locations, size and shape of these zones shall provide for a maximum protection \nof fish and wildlife. \n \n A mixing zone is defined by Rule 7of the Water Quality Regulations as a “limited \narea or volume in the immediate vicinity of a discharge where mixing occurs and the \nreceiving surface water quality is not required to meet applicable standards or criteria, RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 11 \n provided the minimum conditions described in Rule 8.D.1.(e)3 and 8.D.1.(f) of these \nregulations are attained”. \n Petitioners maintain that the permit fails to meet the mandates of WQR 8.D.(1).(f) \nbecause a limited and/or chronic mixing zone is not appropriate in this location and the \npermit does not provide for the maximum protection of fish and wildlife. They further contend that, to meet the mandate of “maximum protection”, OWR should have required \nwhole effluent toxicity (WET) testing. \n Establishment of the mixing zone, a crucial issue in this case, was discussed \nextensively by Mr. Liberti. As part of the permit process, the Applicant submits a plan \ndetailing the proposed discharge system and supplying OWR with dilution calculations \nand other information to establish a mixing zone compliant with applicable regulations \nand to support issuance of the permit. In this case, Applied Science Associates, on \nbehalf of Applicant, evaluated the proposed system and used an EPA-sponsored \nmodel, the CORMIX model, to evaluate the dilution that would occur in the vicinity of \nthe discharge. As is routine with permit applications, Applicant’s consultants did initial \nmodel runs evaluating dilution of the effluent and how it would vary over the tidal cycle. \nThose calculations are set forth in Exhibit A3. OWR then reviews the Application to \nensure compliance with the Regulations. \n In ultimately establishing a mixing zone that meets the Clean Water Act and Rhode Island’s Water Quality Regulations, OWR utilizes portions of the Technical \nSupport Document for Water Quality-Based Toxics Control (“TSD”). The TSD is a guidance document prepared by EPA that discusses methodologies for evaluating \ntoxics in the water column. As a guidance document, the TSD is not binding and OWR may exercise discretion in applying portions of the TSD in evaluating potential permits. \n \n \n3 This section is not applicab le to the instant matter. RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 12 \nThe specific portions used by OWR, both on a routine basis and for this permit, were \nthe sections that describe the establishment of mixing zones consistent with the Clean Water Act and the reasonable potential of a discharge to cause violations of water \nquality criteria. Mr. Liberti was involved in reviewing and approving the permit \ndevelopment document prepared by his staff and under his supervision. Specifically, \nhe reviewed the establishment of the mixing zone, the evaluation of reasonable \npotential for exceeding water quality regulations and the coordination with the Division \nof Fish and Wildlife concerning fisheries issues. According to testimony by Mr. Liberti, a \nmixing zone is an area in which it is expected that water quality criteria will not be met \nuntil the edge of that zone. Moreover, it is an area in which lethality to benthic and stationary organisms is not only allowed, but expected. Alt hough mixing zones are \nallowed, Mr. Liberti acknowledged that the Regulations require that the location, size and shape of the acute and chronic mixing zones provide for the maximum protection of fish and wildlife. It was his conclusion that the permit meets these regulatory requirements . \n Mr. Liberti explained OWR’s interpretation of the phrase “maximum protection”. He stated that this phrase is not interpreted by OWR as prohibiting a discharge. He testified that, if that were the intent of the regulation, it would have been written in a way \nthat allowed a discharge only when other alternatives were infeasible. This is not, in his \nopinion, the intent of the Regulation nor is it how OWR has consistently interpreted and \napplied the phrase “maximum protection”. When OWR allows a mixing zone, “maximum \nprotection” is accomplished by requiring specific permit conditions, on a case-by-case \nbasis, while typically considering the location of the discharge, the size of the discharge, \nflow limits and other factors that would provide greater degrees of protection. \n For this permit, Mr. Liberti testified that OWR followed that routine process and \nconsidered the location of the discharge. OWR required that the discharge be located in \nan area that is well flushed and therefore required that the discharge pipe be placed RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 13 \noutside the breakwater on the ocean side and not inside the harbor where flushing would \nbe minimal. The permitted location promotes rapid mixing of effluent. The discharge pipe is located twenty feet from the seawall to encourage better mixing and a diffuser \npipe is required, again to promote more rapid mixing with the receiving waters. \n In determining the size and shape of the mixing zone, Mr. Liberti testified that \nOWR achieved “maximum protection” as required by the regulations in at least two ways. \nFirst, in determining the size of the mixing zone, and as discussed earlier, OWR \nemployed the EPA recommended method of computing mixing zone diameters and \nchose the most stringent acute mixing zone diameter of 7.9 feet. Secondly, although a \nchronic mixing zone radius of 450' is allowable under the Regulations, OWR mandated \nthat both acute and chronic water quality criteria be met at the edge of the more limited \n7.9 foot radius. \n Other requirements were added by OWR which, according to Mr. Liberti, further \naccomplished the “maximum protection” required by the regulations. OWR prohibited the use of chemicals in the discharge and prohibited use of anti-scaling compounds. \nSignificantly, OWR set a maximum daily discharge of three thousand (3,000) gallons per day -- less than half the volume requested and supported by Applicant in its \nRIPDES application. The effect of the lower volume discharge is to increase the \nApplicant’s predicted dilution factor by two, and reduce by half, the percentage of \nallowable pollutant concentrations. \n Petitioners next maintain that the OWR failed to meet regulatory mandates by \nfailing to require whole effluent toxicity testing (“WET testing”). WET testing is the means suggested by Petitioners to best assess the effects, if any, of additive toxicity of copper, \nnickel and arsenic on the marine organisms in the receiving waters. WET testing evaluates interactions between all pollutants in a discharge rather than focusing on one \nspecific constituent in the discharge. It measures the response of aquatic organisms RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 14 \nexposed to the subject effluent in both acute and chronic tests. Petitioners maintain that \nWET testing would provide a better overall picture of the toxicity of the discharge than would the methods included in the Permit. They assert that the OWR failed to comply \nwith its Regulations by not requiring WET testing of the effluent for this Permit. \n Mary W. Johnson testified on behalf of Petitioners. Ms. Johnson was qualified as \nan expert in bioassays and lobster toxicology. Ms. Johnson was employed as a \nbiological laboratory technician for the EPA from 1973 to 1993 and from that date (to the \npresent) she holds the position of technical information specialist. She conducted toxicity \nbioassays on marine organisms including lobsters and lobster larvae. Specifically, Ms. \nJohnson testified on behalf of Petitioners concerning bioassays she has conducted on \nlobster larvae and mysid shrimp (a test species which she stated would be species \nprotective for crustaceans). It was Ms. Johnson’s testimony that OWR should require \ntesting that would measure the combined effect of metals present in the discharge rather than the effects of a single metal on an organism. Moreover, her testimony was that in \ndoing such testing, OWR should require that mysid shrimp be the test species. \n To further support the need for WET testing, Ms. Johnson testified that the \nseawater at the site of the discharge had little complexing ability with regard to metals. \nAccording to Ms. Johnson, compared to the waters of the upper bay, the receiving \nwaters have little ability to bind metals and make them unavailable to be taken up by \norganisms within the mixing zone. As a result, she testified that the metals discharged to \nthe receiving waters would be more bio-available to organisms, including lobster, thereby increasing the toxicity of the discharge. \n The issue of additive toxicity was also addressed by Dr. McCay. She agreed with Petitioners that metals can have additive effects. She stated that EPA is currently working on development of criteria for additive metal concentrations and effects. There \nis a formula currently in use by EPA and others in the field which she has used, and RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 15 \npublished papers on, which evaluates the additive toxicity of the expected metals. The \nmethod is a “Toxic Unit Analysis” whereby the sum of the toxic units for each pollutant that might have an additive effect is totaled. To be acceptable, the added units must \ntotal less than one (<1.0). Dr. McCay performed this computation adding the toxic units \nfor copper, nickel and arsenic, as compared to the acute criteria (CMC), and determined \nthat at the edge of the mixing zone the sum of toxic use is less than one (.98). Based on \nthis analysis, she concluded that there would be no additive effects outside the mixing \nzone. She performed a similar analysis as compared to the chronic criteria (CCC) and \nconcluded that the sum of toxic use at the edge of the mixing zone was likewise less \nthan one (.65). Because of this comparison, and the fact that the Water Quality Criteria conservatively assume that all dissolved metals are bioavailable, Dr. McCay concluded \nthat the criteria used are protective of not having additive effects from the metals present \nin the effluent. Moreover, these results were achieved using the Applicant’s proposed maximum daily discharge of 7,500 gallons per day, not the Permit-imposed maximum of \n3,000 gallons per day. As a result, Dr. McCay indicated that these numbers are very \nconservative and would likely be cut in half using the maximum daily discharge set by the Permit. \n Mr. Liberti testified that in reviewing the Permit application OWR considered additive toxicity. This concern is addressed in the TSD, which outlines three control \napproaches to protection of aquatic life. It is, again, EPA guidance that recommends that \nstates, in their water quality regulations, look at a) chemical specific numbers for the protection of aquatic life; b) whole effluent toxicity testing (WET Testing) and; c) \nbiosurveys of the waterbody or a biocriteria approach. With regard to this permit, OWR, \nin its discretion, applied chemical specific numbers. WET testing was not required \nbecause it is OWR’s position that whole effluent toxicity requirements are met by the \nnarrative standards adopted in the Water Quality Regulations. RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 16 \n Mr. Liberti’s testimony was clear that WET testing is not mandated by existing \nRegulations. What is required, is that Applicant meet the narrative standards set forth in the Regulations. In evaluating and issuing the Permit, OWR determined that the \nApplicant met those properly adopted standards. Mr. Liberti further explained that \nbecause EPA retains oversight responsibilities for RIPDES Permits, the Permit was \nforwarded to Bob Mendoza, manager of EPA’s Region I Rhode Island unit. EPA’s role \nin a delegated state, such as Rhode Island, is to review the permit and “overfile” should \nthey determine that any conditions or terms of the permit are not appropriate under the \nRegulations. Although there was some communication during the Permit process, \nultimately EPA did not make any comment s concerning the permit limits or the \nestablishment of the mixing zone nor did they “overfile” on the Permit. \n Petitioners questioned Mr. Liberti extensively, but his conclusion that the permit issued by OWR provided the “maximum protection” contemplated by the Regulation did not waver. Although it has been Petitioners’ steadfast position that WET testing is a \nbetter approach and should be employed, no evidence was placed on the record to \nestablish that WET testing is required by applicable regulations or that OWR failed to meet existing water quality regulations or otherwise abused its discretion by following the \nnarrative standards adopted in its Regulations. Petitioners failed to prove that OWR did \nnot comply with WQR 8.D.(1).(f) in issuing this Permit. \nWater Quality Regulation 8.D.(1).(g) i-iv \n \n Water Quality Regulation 8.D.(1).(f) requires that the establishment of a mixing \nzone be determined on a case-by-case basis and include additional minimum \nsafeguards. WQR Rule 8.D.(1).(g) sets these additional requirements as follows: \n \n (g). At a minimum, all mixing zones must: \n \ni. Meet the criteria for aesthetics, in accordance with rule 8.D.(1).b; \n RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 17 \nii. Be limited to an area or volume that will prevent interference with \nthe existing and designated uses in the associated waterbody segment and beyond; \n \niii. Allow an appropriat e zone of passage for migrating fish and other \norganisms, prohibit lethality to organisms passing through the \nmixing zone, and protect for spawning and nursery habitat; and \n \niv. Not allow substances to accumulate in sediments, fish and wildlife \nor food chains such that known or predicted safe exposure levels \nfor the health of humans or fish and wildlife will be exceeded. \n \n At hearing, and in their post-hearing memorandum, Petitioners assert that the \npermit fails to meet the requirements of WQR 8.D.(1).(g) i-iv. For completeness, I will \naddress each subsection separately. \nA.) Does the mixing zone meet the criteria for aesthetics as required by \nWQR 8.D.(1).(g) i? \n \n Applicant’s witness, Dr. McCay, testified to her familiarity with the Water Quality \nRegulations and the requirements in WQR 8 concerning the aesthetics of the mixing \nzone. Dr. McCay testified that the effluent released into the mixing zone is clear, \nwithout visual impact. She concluded that the discharge will not impact existing \naesthetics in the mixing zone. \n There was no evidence introduced to contradict Dr. McCay's testimony \nconcerning the aesthetics of the discharge and I therefore conclude that Petitioners have \nnot demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that OWR has failed to comply with this Regulation. \nB.) Is the mixing zone limited to an area or volume that will prevent \ninterference with existing and designated uses in the associated water body segment and beyond as required by WQR 8.D.(1).(g) ii? \n \n The testimony of both Mr. Liberti and Dr. McCay established that the area of the \nmixing zone is very small. Dr. McCay stated that the actual mixing zone is a radius of \n7.9 feet comprising a total area of approximately 196 square feet. Mr. Liberti testified RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 18 \nthat the volume of the discharge is limited to three thousand (3,000) gallons per day and \ncharacterized it as a minor discharge under the RIPDES Regulations. \n Dr. McCay testified in detail concerning the size and volume of the permitted \nmixing zone compared to areas with similar habitat in the lower Sakonnet River and the \nlower Narragansett Bay. She made statistically conservative comparisons of habitat based upon aerial photographs of the area and concluded that the mixing zone \nrepresents 0.007 percent of these areas and 0.013 percent of the habitat in the lower \nSakonnet River. Dr. McCay testified that the impact of this mixing zone on habitat in \nlower Narragansett Bay is insignificant and insignificant to the total area of the waterbody \nfor other kinds of use of rocky habitat. \n The designated uses for Class SA Waters are shellfish harvesting for direct \nhuman consumption, primary a nd secondary contact recreati onal activities, and fish and \nwildlife habitat. Using the dilution calculations ultimately approved in the Permit, OWR \ndetermined that prior to the edge of the 7.9’ mixing zone, the effluent will meet the more \nstringent of either the aquatic toxicity-based criteria or the human health-based criteria. \nAccordingly, OWR concluded that the discharge will not interfere with existing and designated uses in the associated water body segment. (OWR 4 at 7). With specific \nregard to shellfish harvesting, this conclusion was based on the fact that concentrations \nof copper, arsenic and nickel at the edge of the mixing zone are well below human health \ncriteria for water and fish consumption. \n Based on the foregoing, Petitioners failed to prove that OWR did not comply with \nWQR 8.D.(1).(g) ii. \nC.) Does the mixing zone allow an appropriate zone of passage for \nmigrating fish and other organisms, prohibit lethality to organisms passing through the mixing zone, and protect for spawning and nursery habitat as required by WQR 8.D.(1).(g) iii? \n RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 19 \n This subsection of the regulations garnered the most attention from Petitioners. \nPetitioners maintain that the mixing zone fails to meet any of the requirements of this subsection. \n First, Petitioners maintain that the mixing zone does not allow an appropriate zone of passage for migrating fish and other organisms. Dr. McCay’s testimony addressed this issue. She testified that the mixing zone lies next to the mouth of the \nSakonnet River. The mouth of the river is approximately two and one half miles across. \nAccording to her unchallenged calculations, the mixing zone comprises less than one \npercent (1%) of the linear distance across the Sakonnet River mouth.\n4 She further \ntestified that the mixing zone does not block any migration area, spawning area or \nnursery area. \n Mr. Liberti testified on behalf of OWR regarding this issue. Under cross-examination by Petitioner Karlsson, Mr. Liberti explained that the permit prohibits lethality to organisms passing through the mixing zone. This was achieved by using the \nmethodology outlined in the TSD prepared as guidance by EPA. Mr. Liberti stated that \nEPA indicates in the TSD that lethality to organisms passing through the mixing zone will \nbe avoided if the most stringent criteria in the TSD is required by the permit. As \ndiscussed previously, OWR employs this portion of the TSD on a regular basis to ensure \nthat it meets the requirements of the Clean Water Act. \n On redirect, Mr. Liberti provided detailed testimony indicating the OWR exercised its discretion and followed EPA’s guidance as provided in the TSD entitled “Prevention of Lethality to Passing Organisms”. Mr. Liberti explained that the TSD sets forth three \nmethods for achieving prevention of lethality to organisms passing through the mixing \n \n4 Dr. McCay’s testimony was that the mixing zone is 0.12 percent of the linear cross section distance \nacross the Sakonnet River mouth. \n \n RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 20 \n zone. According to Mr. Liberti, OWR followed the three methods suggested by EPA in \nthe TSD, calculated the diameter of the acute mixing zone for each method and ultimately selected the most restrictive, or smallest diameter mixing zone resulting from \nthe utilization of the EPA criteria.\n5 The EPA recommended criteria are intended to \naddress the most sensitive marine and freshwater organisms that one would expect to \nbe present in a marine environment. DEM uses these criteria as an appropriate level of \nprotectiveness under its regulations. It was Mr. Liberti’s testimony that this process \ncomported with the regulatory requirement that the mixing zone prohibit lethality to \norganisms passing through the mixing zone. \n Petitioners next question whether the discharge will cause an ion imbalance in \nthe receiving waters. Applicant’s witness, Dr. McCay spoke to this issue in her \ntestimony. She indicated that organisms living in a particular marine environment are \naccustomed to a certain ratio of ions in the surrounding water. Calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, chloride and sulfates are the major ions found in seawater. These \nions must be present in the seawater in certain proportions or they may adversely affect \nthe metabolism of the organisms. Dr. McCay disagreed with Petitioners’ assertion that \nthere would be an ionic imbalance in the effluent and ultimately in the mixing zone and \nbeyond, which would negatively affect water quality and fish and wildlife. Dr. McCay \ntestified that she performed a comparison of the ion balance expected in the effluent with \nthe ion balance of the Sakonnet River. She used constituent concentrations present in \nthe well water and constituent concentrations for standard seawater. Assuming an effluent concentration of three times the average well-water concentration, she compared \nthe effluent concentrations to seawater concentrations and characterized the ion balance \nof seawater and effluent as virtually identical. She concluded that the discharge will not \n \n5 These calculations are set forth in the Permit Development Document (OWR 4 ) RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 21 \ncause an imbalance in ions to the receiving waters. The results of her analysis are set \nforth fully in A4. \n Christopher Powell, a Principal Marine Biologist for DEM was called to testify by \nPetitioners and OWR. Upon direct examinatio n by Petitioners, he explained the type of \nhabitat assessment he conducted. He indicated that he and a co-worker visited the \nsite of the proposed discharge by boat and conducted an inspection by diving in the \nvicinity of the discharge. They performed a dive tracing a transect along the bottom \nfrom the discharge area to the shore. During the dive, he observed the area, its \ngeographic characteristics and marine life. Based on these observations and his \nknowledge and experience concerning bay habitat, he concluded that the area was \ntypical of marine habitat along the breakwaters of lower Narragansett Bay. He \ncharacterized this process as a qualitative su rvey of the site. Petitioners have criticized \nOWR’s use of a qualitative survey of the site and have argued that a quantitative \nspecies survey should have been perform ed. They have not, however, introduced \nsufficient evidence to prove that a qualitative survey is inadequate or fails to comply with regulatory requirements. \n Petitioners next assert that the Permit fails to protect for spawning and nursery \nhabitat as required in WQR 8.D.(1).(g) iii. Several witnesses testified with regard to this \nissue and there was conflicting testimony concerning the nature and value of the habitat in the area of the discharge. \n Dr. Diane Cowan was called by Petitioners and qualified by agreement as an \nexpert in habitat characterization, lobster biology and recruitment. Dr. Cowan is a \nPh.D. Biologist and has studied lobsters for twenty (20) years. She has spent the last \neleven years conducting a monthly census of lobster nursery habitats and founded the Lobster Conservancy in 1996 to survey juvenile lobster populations throughout New \nEngland. Dr. Cowan visited the site at extremely low tide to observe the habitat in the RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 22 \ngeneral area of the discharge. She overturned rocks to determine species \ncomposition. She also consulted the nautical charts and the memoranda prepared by OWR witness, Chistopher Powell. She did not dive at the site but she did prepare a \nspecies survey in the area closest to shore – the intertidal area within the radius of the \ndischarge. \n Based on her observations, she concluded that the site represents an important \nlobster nursery habitat. It was her testimony that the area of the discharge is the type \nof habitat where lobsters are commonly found. Based on her observations and \nexperience, she testified that the acute mixing zone covers approximately eighteen \nsquare meters and that the habitat within that area supports a mean density of between 1 and 4.5 lobsters per square meter (for a total number of expected lobsters \nof between 18 and 80 within the 7.9’ radius of the mixing zone). She testified, under \ncross-examination that lobsters are a common species in Narragansett Bay. She characterized the cobble/boulder habitat that she observed as rare, although she \nagreed that it is typical of the marine habitat along breakwaters in the lower reaches of \nNarragansett Bay. \n Petitioner John D. Karlsson was qualified, by agreement of the parties, as an \nexpert in habitat characterization and fisheries. Mr. Karlsson was employed by DEM \nas a marine biologist. He has since retired. His duties included habitat evaluation and \nhabitat utilization. He testified that the area of the discharge is lobster nursery habitat. \n Mark Gibson testified on behalf of the OWR concerning lobster population \ndensities and lobster habitat. Mr. Gibson serves as the Deputy Chief of the Fish and \nWildlife Office of DEM and is responsible for administering the marine fisheries section. \nHe has been employed at DEM for twenty-five years serving first as an entry-level biologist in the freshwater fisheries section and attained the position of Principal \nFisheries Biologist in the marine fisheries section in 1994. Mr. Gibson has performed RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 23 \n extensive work on lobster population dynamics. Specif ically, he has assessed the \nstatus of the fishery resources in Rhode Island preparing stock assessments \nestimating the size and fluctuation of populations. He has also worked on the \npopulation dynamics of lobster in the Rhode Island area in response to three oil spills, \nthe earliest of which occurred in 1989. He has also conducted population dynamics \nmodeling for other marine species including winter and summer flounder, striped bass, \nand bay quahogs. He is currently working on a marine population dynamics project \nconcerning the status of the Area 2 lobster fishery, an area which runs from the elbow \nof Cape Cod to the tip of Long Island and includes all of the state waters of Rhode \nIsland including Narragansett Bay. Mr. Gibson was qualified, by agreement of the parties, as an expert in marine ecology and marine organism population dynamics. \n Mr. Gibson determined that in assessing impacts to lobsters from the proposed discharge, the appropriate management unit to which comparisons should be made is the Area 2 lobster fishery which encompasses the Sakonnet Point area. Any lobsters \nthat are produced from early benthic phase to adult would be part of the Area 2 lobster \nfishery. It was Mr. Gibson’s opinion that the small sphere of habitat impacted by the mixing zone, even if it has lobster density at the high end of the ranges testified to by \nDr. Cowan at this hearing, would constitute a “tiny fraction” of the Area 2 lobster \nfishery. He opined that the discharge would not have a detectable effect on lobster \nnursery areas in Area 2.\n6 \n Mr. Gibson disagreed with Dr. Cowan’s statement that the discharge area was \nan important lobster nursery habitat. It was Mr. Gibson’s testimony, based on his \nexperience and the data contained in OWR 18, that the discharge area is not the type \n \n \n6 Dr. McCay had testified that of t he possible 18 to 80 lobsters that may be impacted by the mixing zone, \nonly about one tenth of one pe rcent (.1%) would actually mature to legal size and then, only a fraction of \nthose would be caught. RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 24 \nof area that would hold high concentrati ons of newly settled or early benthic phase \nlobsters. Although he acknowledges that there are some lobsters present in the area \nof the discharge, and some in the benthic stage, he characterized it as a performance \narea for older, larger lobsters. He reiterated on cross-examination that lobster habitat \nexists in the discharge area, but that it is a small piece of habitat relative to all the \nhabitat available in Rhode Island for the lobster fishery. \n On direct examination Mr. Liberti was questioned specifically with respect to \nprotection of spawning and nursery habitat. Having heard the testimony of the Dr. \nCowan concerning the use of the discharge area by lobsters and other aquatic life, Mr. \nLiberti was confident that OWR protected for spawning and nursery habitat. He stated that “irregardless” of whether the discharge area is found to be spawning or nursery \nhabitat, OWR had provided the degree of protection required in its Regulations by \nlimiting the size of the mixing zone. \n Based on the foregoing, I conclude that Petitioners failed to prove that OWR did \nnot comply with WQR 8.D.(1).(g) iii. \nD.) Does the mixing zone not allow substances to accumulate in sediments, \nfish and wildlife or food chains such that known or predicted safe exposure levels for the health of humans or fish and wildlife will be exceeded as \nrequired by WQR 8.D.(1).(g) iv? \n \n Dr. McCay addressed this issue on direct examination. She testified that the \neffluent will be below human health criteria for the metals that have a reasonable \npotential to cause an exceedance of water quality criteria. She therefore concluded, as \ndid OWR, that exposure levels for humans, fish and wildlife will not be exceeded in the discharge. As a result, the discharge will no t allow substances to accumulate in the \nsediment or the foodchain. The same conclusion was reached by OWR as reflected in the Permit Development Document. The basis for that conclusion is that the \nconcentrations of copper, arsenic and nickel at the edge of the mixing zone are well RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 25 \nbelow the human health criteria for water consumption (the most sensitive pathway of \nexposure) and fish consumption. The human health criteria were developed by EPA and account for bioaccumulation .(OWR 4 at 3). \n Based on the foregoing analysis, Petitioners failed to prove that OWR did not comply with the requirements of WQR 8.D.(1).(g)iv. \n \nIV. Did OWR fail to meet the antidegradation requirements set forth in Rule 18 \nand the Antidegradation Implementation Policy of Appendix C of the \nWater Quality Regulations? \n \n The provisions of the State Antidegradation Regulations have as their objective \nthe protection and maintenance of water quality and uses. Appendix C of the WQRs \nstates, with regard to protecting high quality waters such as Sakonnet River, \n “[I]n waters where the existing water quality exceeds levels necessary to \nsupport propagation of fish and wildlife, and recreation in and on the water, that \nquality shall be maintained and protected, except for insignificant changes in water quality as determined by the Director and in accordance with this Antidegradation Implementation Policy, as amended”. \n \n The Antidegradation Implementation Policy requires that any discharge that \nconsumes greater than twenty percent (>20%) of the remaining assimilative capacity of the receiving water is considered significant and requires the further step of an \n“important benefits demonstration”. \n The Permit Development Document (OWR 4) describes the specific process \nfollowed by OWR in determining compliance with antidegradation criteria and the \nmodeling runs that were conducted. The receiving waters were determined to be High \nQuality Waters under the regulation. It was further determined that the discharge has the reasonable potential to impact copper, nickel and arsenic concentrations. In order \nto assure compliance with antidegradation requirements, the antidegradation criteria \nwere used in establishing the chronic mixing zone. All modeling runs were performed \nusing the CORMIX model, an EPA approved modeling methodology. To be most RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 26 \nconservative, the modeling assumed ebb slack tide, which represents the phase of the \ntidal cycle that affords the least dilution of effluent. OWR 4 sets forth in detail the computations and analysis performed by OWR. The result of this modeling reflects \nthat Copper requires the largest mixing zone to meet the antidegradation criteria – \n450’. Nickel and arsenic meet antidegradation requirements within 7.9’ of the outfall. \nFor copper, nickel and arsenic, water quality criteria, both acute and chronic, are met \nwithin 7.9 feet of the discharge. The Permit Development document reflects OWR’s \nultimate conclusion that less than 20% of the remaining assimilative capacity would be \nused for copper, nickel and arsenic, and therefore the discharge was characterized as \nan insignificant change in water quality for purposes of the Antidegradation Implementation Policy. \n Mr. Liberti testified that the Antidegradation Implementation Policy not only requires that criteria be met, but also restricts impacts from the discharge that are even a marginal change from existing water quality. Mr. Liberti testified that in evaluating the \nreasonable potential for pollutants to cause an exceedance of water quality criteria, \nOWR looked at the most stringent effluent limit allowable, whether that was the limit necessary to comply with antidegradation or the limits necessary to achieve chronic or \nacute criteria at a distance of eight (8) feet from the outfall. He concluded that the \nPermit meets antidegradation mandates because at the edge of the 450’ zone, there \nwould be no more than a 20% change in existing water quality. \nConclusion \n Each issue raised by Petitioners in this proceeding was previously addressed in OWR’s Response to Public Comments. In each instance, OWR presented reasoned \nexplanations for approving the Permit notwithstanding Petitioners’ objections. Mr. Karlsson and Ms. Johnson strongly and sincerely disagree with OWR’s interpretations of \nits own Regulations and the discretion it exercised in issuing the Permit. RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 27 \n The Department’s water quality criteria were adopted by rule subject to the public \nnotice and comment mandates of the Rhode Island Administrative Procedures Act. R.I. GEN. LAWS § 42-35-1 et seq . These criteria, established through properly adopted \nregulations, must be adhered to by the Applicant. The purpose of the Water Quality Regulations is to maintain existing water quality uses and to serve the purposes of the \nClean Water Act. OWR is entitled to rely on state water quality standards as an \nassurance that maximum protection of the waters w ill be achieved. The substantial, \nreliable and probative evidence of record establishes that the water quality criteria will be met within the 7.9’ mixing zone. The Office of Water Resources does not have the \nauthority to require more stringent criteria than what is set forth in its Water Quality Regulations. Those Regulations are deemed protective of state surface waters unless \nproven otherwise. No such proof was proffered and Petitioners’ challenge in this regard \nis more appropriately characterized as an assault on the Regulations\n7 rather than the \nissue before me of whether the OWR met existing regulations in issuing the Permit. \n With regard to Petitioners’ assertion that OWR’s interpretation of “maximum protection” does not comport with the Regulations, Mr. Liberti explained OWR’s interpretation of the phrase and gave a reasoned explanation for that interpretation and \nthe manner in which “maximum protection” was accomplished in the Permit conditions. \nPetitioners have attempted to establish that the Permit should be more restrictive and \nshould require other alternatives to the proposed discharge. They propose a more \nnarrow interpretation of the phrase “maximum protection”. \n The challenges presented by Petitioners go to the heart of OWR’s approval \nmethodology and involve factual and scientific areas in which DEM’s expertise is heavily \n \n7 Challenges to existing regulations are not appropriate for consideration at this evidentiary hearing. R.I. \nGEN. LAWS §42-35-7 provides a procedure for challengin g the validity or applicability of rules. Should an \ninterested party seek to amend, re peal, or seek promulgation of a rule, the procedure for doing so is set \nforth in the Rhode Isla nd Administrative Procedures Act (R.I. GEN. LAWS §42-35-6). RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 28 \nimplicated. Not only is an agency entitled to deference with regard to factual questions \ninvolving scientific matters in its own area of expertise, but the degree of deference accorded increases when the agency interprets its own regulations. Adams v. U.S. \nE.P.A., 38 F. 3d 43 (1\nst Cir. 1994). An agency’s interpretation of its own regulations is \nentitled to substantial deference. Cohen v. Brown University, 101 F. 3d 155 (1st Cir \n1996). \n Assuming arguendo that some of the alternatives suggested by the Petitioners, \nincluding WET testing, may ultimately provide a greater degree of protection, Petitioners’ \nburden is to prove that, in issuing this Permit, OWR did not comply with existing \nRegulations. Not only have Petitioners failed to prove that OWR’s actions did not meet the requirements of the RIPDES and Water Quality Regulations as discussed in this \nDecision and Order, but the evidence of record establishes that issuance of the Permit \nwas in accord with existing Regulations. If the Applicant meets all existing regulatory \nrequirements, neither the hearing officer nor the Director has legal authority to impose \nmore stringent regulatory mandates. Newbay Corporation v. Annarummo , 587 A.2d 63 \n(RI 1991). Such action would constitute a new agency rule in violation of the procedures \nset forth in R.I. GEN. LAWS §42-35-3. Id., at 66. \n Petitioners have failed to sustain their burden of proving that OWR failed to comply with the requirements of RIPDES and Water Quality regulations discussed \nherein. The documentary and testimonial evidence offered by OWR and Applicant \nestablishes that issuance of the Permit complied with existing Regulations. \n Based on the testimonial and documentary evidence of record I make the \nfollowing \nFINDINGS OF FACT \n1. Sakonnet Point Club, Inc. proposes to build a multi-purpose yacht club and \nmarina on Bluff Head Avenue in Little Compton, Rhode Island, and proposes to RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 29 \nuse a reverse osmosis treatment system for the potable fresh water needs of the club. \n \n2. Employees of the Office of Water Resources, Department of Environmental \nManagement, received an application for a RIPDES permit on August 4, 2000 and determined the application complete on October 3, 2001. \n \n3. OWR issued a draft permit RIPDES Number RI0023558 on July 1, 2002. \n \n4. OWR opened a public comment period for the draft permit, RIPDES Number \nRI0023558 from July 17, 2002 to August 20, 2002. \n \n5. On August 19, 2002, OWR held a public hearing on draft permit, RIPDES \nRI0023558, at which Petitioners submitted oral and written comments. \n \n6. Pursuant to EPA oversight responsibilities for RIPDES permits, the draft permit \nwas forwarded to EPA Region I Rhode Island Office. EPA did not overfile on the Permit. \n \n7. On November 29, 2002, OWR issued RIPDES RI0023558 as a final permit, \naccompanied by a response to public comments and notification that “a formal hearing could be requested within 30 days of the receipt of this letter.” \n \n8. On December 31, 2002, John Karlsson filed a request for an adjudicative hearing \nwith the Administrative Adjudication division for Environmental Matters. \n \n9. On January 6, 2003, Mary W. Johnson filed a request for an adjudicative hearing \nwith the Administrative Adjudication division for Environmental Matters. \n \n10. Said Permit establishes a discharge flow limit of 3,000 gallons per day. The \nApplicant had proposed a maximum daily discharge of 7,500 gallons per day. \n \n11. The Permit will allow the discharge of concentrated brackish groundwater from a \nreverse osmosis treatment system used to desalinate on-site groundwater wells as the source for a public drinking water supply. \n \n12. The source of the brackish water to be desalinated are from three, deep bedrock \nwells. \n \n13. The concentrated brackish water from the reverse osmosis treatment system is \nproposed to be discharged by pipe and diffuser into the Sakonnet River. \n \n14. The groundwater is to be desalinated using a treatment system that consists of \npre-filtration, reverse osmosis, and ultraviolet disinfection. \n \n15. No discharge of chemicals used in cleaning or sanitizing the pretreatment of feed \nwater or coagulation treatment are allowed under the permit. \n \n16. Copper, arsenic and nickel were the only metals identified as being present in a \nconcentration above the laboratory detection limit in the groundwater. \n RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 30 \n17. The discharge has no reasonable potential to violate water quality criteria for \ndissolved oxygen. \n \n18. The discharge has no reasonable potential to violate water quality criteria for \nBOD, COD or TOC. \n \n19. The source water will be processed through a 25m pre-filter. \n \n20. As a result of pre-filtration, no measurable levels of total suspended solids are \nexpected in the discharge. \n \n21. The discharge has no reasonable potential to cause a violation of water quality \ncriteria for total suspended solids. \n \n22. The discharge has no reasonable potential to violate water quality criteria for \nTotal Dissolved Solids. \n \n23. The discharge has no reasonable potential to violate water quality criteria for \nammonia. \n \n24. The water quality criteria for temperature is a change of 1.6ºF at the boundary of \nthe mixing zone. \n \n25. The in-stream temperature change within the mixing zone (7.9 ft. radius) was \ncalculated to be 1º. \n \n26. The discharge has no reasonable potential to cause an exceedence of the in-\nstream temperature water quality criteria. \n \n27. OWR waived reporting requirements for BOD, TOC, COD, Temperature, TSS, \nTDS and Ammonia. \n \n28. New discharges from desalination facilit ies to Class SA waters are allowed in \naccordance with the Rhode Island Water Quality Regulations, Rule 9.E(2)(k). \n \n29. The Technical Support Document (“TSD”) is published by EPA and provides \nguidance to states in evaluating and analyzing RIPDES applications. \n \n30. OWR is not required to employ all provisions of the TSD. \n \n31. The proposed discharge is a minor discharge under the RIPDES Regulations. \n \n32. A non-thermal mixing zone was established in the Permit. \n \n33. A mixing zone is an area in the immediate vicinity of a discharge where mixing \noccurs and the receiving surface water quality is not required to meet applicable water quality criteria. \n \n34. The Permit establishes the radius of the approved acute mixing zone at 7.9 feet. \n RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 31 \n35. The Permit establishes the radius of the chronic mixing zone at 7.9 feet. The \ntotal area of the mixing zone is approximately 196 square feet. \n \n36. Applied Science Associates on behalf of Applicant evaluated the proposed \nsystem and employed the EPA sponsored “CORMIX” model to evaluate the dilution that would occur in the vicinity of the discharge \n \n37. According to modeling results, both chronic (CCC) and acute (CMC) water quality \ncriteria for copper, nickel and arsenic will be met at the edge of the mixing zone. \n \n38. EPA recommended criteria, used by OWR, are intended to address the most \nsensitive marine organisms that one would expect to be present in a marine environment. \n \n39. OWR relies on the EPA recommended criteria as an appropriate level of \nprotectiveness under its Regulations. \n \n40. Water Quality Regulation 8.D.(1).(f) requires that mixing zones shall provide for a \n“maximum protection” of fish and wildlife. \n \n41. No definition of “maximum protection” is provided in the Regulations. \n \n42. OWR does not interpret “maximum protection” as prohibiting a discharge. \n \n43. OWR has consistently interpreted “maximum protection” as allowing a mixing \nzone but requiring conditions and limitations that provide greater degrees of protection. \n \n44. OWR applied that interpretation to this Application and required the following: \n \na. The discharge be located outside the breakwater on the ocean side to \npromote better flushing and rapid mixing of effluent. \nb. The discharge pipe is located twenty (20´) from the seawall. \nc. The acute mixing zone be limited to a radius of 7.9 feet. \nd. The chronic mixing zone be limited to a radius of 7.9 feet. \ne. Use of anti-scaling compounds was prohibited. \nf. Use of chemicals in the discharge is prohibited. \ng. Maximum daily discharge be limited to 3,000 gallons per day. \n \n45. Whole effluent toxicity testing is not required by the Regulations. \n \n46. The discharge will not cause an ionic imbalance in the receiving waters. \n \n47. There will be no additive toxicity effects outside the mixing zone. \n \n48. The effluent that will be released into the mixing zone will be clear and without \nvisual impact. \n \n49. The discharge will not impact existing aesthetics in the mixing zone. \n RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 32 \n50. The discharge will not interfere with existing and designated waterbody uses in \nthe waterbody segment and beyond. \n \n51. The mixing zone comprises approximately 0.007 of lower Narragansett Bay and \n0.013 percent of the habitat in the lower Sakonnet River. \n \n52. To prohibit lethality to organisms passing through the mixing zone, OWR followed \nthe guidance in § 4.3.3 of the TSD and selected the most restrictive mixing zone diameter allowed. \n \n53. The mixing zone prohibits lethality to organisms passing through it. \n \n54. The mixing zone comprises less than one percent (<1%) of the linear distance \nacross the Sakonnet River mouth and does not block any migration, spawning or nursery area. \n \n55. The mixing zone allows for an appropriate zone of passage for migrating fish and \nother organisms. \n \n56. The impact of the mixing zone on habitat use is insignificant. \n \n57. Nursery and spawning habitat were adequately protected by limiting the size of \nthe acute and chronic mixing zone to 7.9’, limiting the discharge to 3,000 gallons per day and prohibiting the use of chemicals. \n \n58. Concentrations of copper, arsenic and nickel are well below human health criteria \nat the edge of the mixing zone. \n \n59. The discharge will not allow substances to accumulate in the sediment or \nfoodchain such that safe exposure levels for humans, fish and wildlife will be exceeded. \n \n60. The Sakonnet River, in the area of the discharge, is a high quality water. \n \n61. The discharge will consume less than tw enty percent (<20%) of the remaining \nassimilative capacity of the receiving water for copper, nickel and arsenic at the edge of the 450’ radius. \n \n62. The change in water quality at the edge of the 450’ radius is insignificant. \n \n \nCONCLUSIONS OF LAW \n After consideration of all the documentary and testimonial evidence of record, I \nconclude the following as a matter of law: \n1. Petitioners failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that OWR failed \nto meet the requirements of RIPDES Regulation 11.02(a)(14)(i)(A) in issuing \nthe Permit. \n RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 33 \n2. Petitioners failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that OWR failed \nto meet the requirements of the Rhode Island Water Quality Regulations 8.D.(1).(f) and (g) in issuing this Permit. \n \n3. Petitioners failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that OWR failed \nto comply with the antidegradation requirements set forth in Rule 18 and the \nAntidegradation Implementation Policy of Appendix C of the Water Quality \nRegulations. \n \n4. Issuance of the Permit was in accord with the RIPDES and Water Quality \nRegulations. \n \n5. OWR’s interpretation of the phrase “maximum protection” was not arbitrary or \nan abuse of discretion. \n \n6. OWR’s interpretation of its own Regulations is entitled to substantial deference. \n \nBased on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law it is hereby \n \n \nORDERED \n \n \n1. Applicant’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law is DENIED . \n \n2. Petitioners’ Appeals are DENIED AND DISMISSED . \n \n \n Entered as a Recommended Decision and Order and transmitted to the \nDirector for issuance as a Final Agency Decision and Order this 8th day of October, \n2003. \n \n \n _________________________________________ \n Kathleen M. Lanphear \n Chief Hearing Officer \n Department of Environmental Management \n Administrative Adjudication Division \n 235 Promenade Street, Third Floor \n Providence, Rhode Island 02908 \n 401-222-1357 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 34 \n \nEntered as a Final Agency Decision and Order this 14th day of October , \n2003. \n \n \n \n _____________________________________ \n Jan H. Reitsma \n D i r e c t o r \n Department of Environmental Management \n 235 Promenade Stree 4 t,\n Providence, RI 02908 th Floor \n \n \n \nCERTIFICATION \n \nI hereby certify that I caused a true copy of the within Decision and Order to be forwarded by first-class mail, postage prepaid, to John Karlsson, 956 Main Street, P.O. Box 1023, Hope Valley, RI 02832; Mary W. Johnson, 956 Main Street, P.O. Box 593, \nHope Valley, RI 02832 and R. Kelly Sheridan, Esquire, Roberts Carroll Feldstein & \nPierce, 10 Weybosset Street, Providence, RI 02903; and via interoffice mail to: Gregory Schultz, Office of Legal Services, 235 Promenade Street, Providence, RI 02908 on this \n15 day of October, 2003. \n \n \n \n \n \n_____________________________________ \n \n \nAppeal Procedure \n \n \nIf you are aggrieved by this final agency order, you may appeal this final order to the \nRhode Island Superior Court within thirty ( 30) days from the date of mailing of this \nnotice of final decision pursuant to the provisions for judicial review established by the \nRhode Island Administrative Procedures Act, specifically, R.I. Gen. Laws §42-35-15. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 35 \nAPPENDIX A \n \nEXHIBIT LIST \n \nPetitioners’ Exhibits \n \nP 1 (ID) John Karlsson’s testimony at August 19, 2002, Public Hearing \n \nP 2 ID) John Karlsson’s Request for Adjudicative Hearing \n \nP 3 (ID) Mary Johnson’s testimony at August 19, 2002, Public Hearing \n \nP 4 (ID) Mary Johnson’s Request for Adjudicative Hearing \n \nP 5 (ID) Maine’s Coastal Wetlands: I. Types, Distribution, Rankings, Functions and Values, Alison E. Ward, Bureau of Land & Water Quality, Division of \nEnvironmental Assessment, Augusta, ME. September, 1999. DEPLW1999-13 \n \nP 6 (Full) Chris Powell memo to Grover Fugate, 2 October 2000 \n \nP 7 (ID) The American Lobster in Narragansett Bay: Patterns of Benthic \nRecruitment, Adult Populations, and Fishing Effort, Richard A. Wahle, \n#NBP-91-67) \n \nP 8 (ID) Division of Harbors and Rivers Assent No. 22-Sakonnet River-1957 \n \nP 9 (ID) Sakonnet Harbor, R.I., Repairs to Breakwater, Plans and Sections, \nUSACOE. Oct.1973 \n \nP 10 (Full) Chris Powell Memo to Angelo Liberti, 3 July 2002 \n \nP 11 (Full) Erin Papa, Rejection Concentration Analysis, 1/29/02 \n \nP 12 (Full) Analytical Balance Corporation, Results of Analysis, 1 May 2000 \n \nP 13 (Full) Virgil Carr memo to Marty Dowgert, 5-3-2002 \n \nP 14 (ID) Acute and Chronic Effects of Water Quality Criteria-Based Metal \nMixtures on Three Aquatic Species, Spehar, Robert L. and James T. Fiandt, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry , Vol 5, pp 917-931, \n1986 \n \nP 15 (ID) Technical Fact Sheet: Final Rule for (Non-Radon) Radionuclides in \nDrinking Water, EPA 815-F-00-013, November 2000 \n \n \n \n \n \n RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 36 \nP 16 (ID) Protocols for Determining Major-Seawater-Ion Toxicity in Membrane-Technology Water-Treatment Concentrat e, Florida Department of \nEnvironmental Protection, Bureau of Laboratories, 12/28/95 \n \nP 17 (ID) Whole Effluent Toxicity: Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the \nAnalysis of Pollutants, Federal Register, October 16, 1995 \n \nP 18 (ID) Technical Support Document for Water Quality-Based Toxics Contro l, \nin part; (Full) USEPA, March 1991 \nin part (see \nTranscript) \n \nP 19 (Full) Acute Toxicity of Cadmium, Copper, and Mercury to Larval American \nLobster Homarus americanus, Johnson, Mary W. and John H. Gentile. \nBulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicolog y, 22, 258-264 \n(1979) \n \nP 20 (Full) Proposed Pilot Testing and Operations & Maintenance Manual for \nSakonnet Point Club Water Treatment Facility, Little Compton, Rhode \nIsland, Mount Hope Engineering, Inc., July 28, 2000 \n \nP 21 (Full) Todd Chaplin Letter to June Swallow, July 26, 2001 \n \nP 22 (Full) June Swallow Letter to Todd Chaplin, May 16, 2001 \n \nP 23 (ID) Physical Chemistry of Seawater \n(http://www.gso.uri.edu/~dkester/pchem.htm) \n \nP 24 (Full) Curriculum vitae of Diane F. Cowan \n \nP 25 (Full) Curriculum vitae of Mary W. Johnson \n \nP 26 (Full) Curriculum vitae of John D. Karlsson \n \nP 27 (Full) Curriculum vitae of Warren S. Boothman \n \nP 28 (Full) E-mail memo from Virgil Carr to Angelo Liberti dated December 5, 2002 \n \nP 29 (Full) E-mail memo from Angelo Liberti to Virgil Carr dated December 11, \n2002 \n \nP 30 (Full) Memo from Stephen DiLorenzo to Terry Walsh dated May 16, 2002 \n \nP 31 (Full) Memo from Eric Beck to Joe Haberek and Angelo Liberti dated \nSeptember 17, 2002 \n \nP 32 (Full) Memo from David Turin to Eric Beck dated September 17, 2002 \n \nP 33 (ID) Copy of Comparison of Dissolved & Total Metals Concentrations from \nAcute Tests with Saltwater Organisms \n RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 37 \nP 34 (ID) E-mail from Mr. Boothman to Mary Johnson \n \nP 35 (ID) Written testimony of Dr. Cowan \n \nP 36 (ID) E-mail from Stephen Di Lorenzo to Terry Walsh dated March 24, 2003 \n \n \nOWR’s Exhibits \n \nOWR 1 (Full) Copy of RIPDES Permit No. RI0023558 issued to the Sakonnet \nPoint Club, Incorporated on November 29, 2002 (7 pp.); \n \nOWR 2 (Full) Copy of Statement of Basis for RIPDES Permit No. RI0023558 \n(4 pp.); \n \nOWR 3 (Full) Copy of Response to Public Comments, Sakonnet Point Club \nWater Treatment Facility, RIPDES Permit No. RI0023558 (19 pp.); \n \nOWR 4 (Full) Copy of Permit Development Document, Sakonnet Point Club \nWater Treatment Facility, RIPDES Permit No. RI0023558 (30 pp.); \n \nOWR 5 (Full) Copy of Inter-Office Memo from Angelo Liberti to John Stolgitis \ndated May 31, 2002 regarding Sakonnet Point Club, Inc. Desalination System Discharge (3 pp.); \n \nOWR 6 (Full) Copy of Memorandum from Chris Powell to Angelo Liberti dated \nJuly 3, 2002 regarding Sakonnet Point Club Site Visit (2 pp.); \n \nOWR 7 (Full) Copy of letter from Todd Chaplin of Mount Hope Engineering, \nInc. to Eric Beck dated January 9, 2002 with laboratory test data for three wells installed at the Sakonnet Club site (7 pp.); \n \nOWR 8 (Full) Copy of Ambient Water Quality Criteria - Saltwater Copper \nAddendum, April 14, 1995, U.S. Environmental Protection \nAgency (35 pp.); \n \nOWR 9 (Full) Copy of portion of Table 1. Acute Toxicity of Copper to Aquatic \nAnimals, pages 26 and 44 of the Ambient Water Quality Criteria \nfor Copper - 1984 , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (4 \npp.); \n \nOWR 10 (Full) Copy of portion of Table 3. Ranked Genus Mean Acute Values \nwith Species Mean Acute-Chronic Ratios, pages 51, 55, and 56 of the Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Copper - 1984 , U.S. \nEnvironmental Protection Agency (5 pp.); \n \nOWR 11 (Full) Copy of Whole Effluent Toxicity (WET) Control Policy, dated July \n1994, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (22 pp.); \n RE: SAKONNET POINT CLUB, INC. AAD No. 02-007/WRA \nPERMIT NO. RI0023558 \nPage 38 \nOWR 12 (Full) Copy of Resume of Angelo S. Liberti III, PE (2 pp.); \n \nOWR 13 (Full) Copy of Resume of Joseph Haberek \n \nOWR 14 (Full) Copy of Resume of Mark Gibson \n \nOWR 15 (Full) Copy of Resume of J. Christopher Powell \n \nOWR 16 (Full) Copy of Memorandum from Chris Powell to Greg Schultz, dated \n3/18/2003 \n \nOWR 17 (Full) Copy of Resume of Thomas Angell \n \nOWR 18 (Full) Copy of Wahle Lobster Settlement Index (10pp.) \n \nOWR 19 (Full) Copy of Data Summary of Average Lobster Densities \n \n \nApplicant’s Exhibits \n \nA 1 (Full) Resume of Deborah P. French McCay (21 pp.) \n \nA 2 (Full) Area of Rocky Habitat Along Exposed Coast of Rhode Island (2 pp.) \n \nA 3 (Full) Dilution Calculations for Edge of Mixing Zone (1 p.) \n \nA 4 (Full) Major Constituents in Seawater and Sakonnet Point Club Effluent (1 p.) \n \nA 5 (Full) Resume of Todd Chaplin, PE (3 pp.) \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n "
} |
[
0.055371832102537155,
-0.01996634341776371,
-0.029173368588089943,
0.05122577026486397,
-0.006848966237157583,
0.04344066232442856,
-0.028138699010014534,
0.014853674918413162,
-0.047829363495111465,
0.0009951279498636723,
0.01964527554810047,
-0.0860709473490715,
-0.0033583396580070257,
0.03616612032055855,
-0.004199011716991663,
-0.029381364583969116,
0.024103552103042603,
0.020236533135175705,
-0.0006255625048652291,
-0.09468413889408112,
-0.011632372625172138,
-0.02995983324944973,
-0.061605338007211685,
-0.0827522948384285,
0.021549910306930542,
-0.0038726667407900095,
0.011253634467720985,
0.029609913006424904,
-0.010685359127819538,
-0.01501014456152916,
-0.0691908746957779,
0.090253084897995,
0.05207886919379234,
-0.014160649850964546,
0.009353389032185078,
-0.026047952473163605,
0.024067748337984085,
0.00925017986446619,
0.005285999272018671,
0.010955380275845528,
-0.007414658088237047,
-0.07864154875278473,
-0.022185001522302628,
-0.10731180757284164,
0.0071606929413974285,
-0.009142431430518627,
0.0056781345047056675,
-0.024476250633597374,
-0.00656237592920661,
0.12305475026369095,
-0.017364218831062317,
0.1034700870513916,
-0.006790559738874435,
0.08619977533817291,
-0.0018376667285338044,
-0.03989851847290993,
-0.03826827183365822,
-0.031931713223457336,
0.008613958954811096,
0.030718129128217697,
-0.04792425036430359,
0.030130386352539062,
-0.02038135938346386,
-0.014843441545963287,
0.08550649136304855,
-0.0033308768179267645,
-0.06298953294754028,
-0.06646256893873215,
-0.08182359486818314,
-0.03835558518767357,
0.04214828461408615,
-0.10078120976686478,
-0.09994029253721237,
-0.04922301322221756,
0.018086671829223633,
-0.03052429109811783,
0.05158581957221031,
0.057396795600652695,
0.058295298367738724,
-0.07291679829359055,
0.05448637530207634,
-0.022030839696526527,
-0.05508916825056076,
0.014618882909417152,
-0.07385638356208801,
-0.04001794382929802,
0.04651959612965584,
0.01192508079111576,
-0.01654752343893051,
0.04054028168320656,
0.05595310404896736,
0.0800030380487442,
-0.021239876747131348,
0.013639108277857304,
0.00837261788547039,
0.02715359441936016,
-0.07178554683923721,
0.0002460335672367364,
0.049668680876493454,
0.0021421057172119617,
-0.008321776054799557,
0.0188745129853487,
-0.048616476356983185,
-0.003071892773732543,
-0.15498526394367218,
-0.051135849207639694,
0.02582685276865959,
0.028064310550689697,
-0.026742959395051003,
-0.02377389371395111,
-0.028057647868990898,
-0.0002591256925370544,
-0.05752599611878395,
-0.07081463932991028,
0.037501897662878036,
-0.039521414786577225,
-0.02372412569820881,
-0.023019347339868546,
0.031492382287979126,
0.10997268557548523,
0.10929542779922485,
0.05010336637496948,
-0.04396934062242508,
0.016076575964689255,
-0.007393353618681431,
-0.03031465783715248,
-0.054382190108299255,
1.0443710783949307e-33,
0.023815881460905075,
-0.0004231299681123346,
0.07819569855928421,
-0.03976137563586235,
-0.051407329738140106,
-0.010809405706822872,
-0.06791903078556061,
0.004276478197425604,
0.09424982964992523,
-0.00191288732457906,
-0.07536832243204117,
0.031870897859334946,
-0.03335990011692047,
-0.03932633623480797,
0.04195764660835266,
-0.05802292749285698,
0.01464757602661848,
0.07770642638206482,
-0.03850714862346649,
0.05228528752923012,
0.0013262847205623984,
0.00855653639882803,
0.000752511085011065,
0.027088914066553116,
0.0686996653676033,
-0.012992230243980885,
0.02555794268846512,
0.03757549822330475,
0.049479853361845016,
0.012402008287608624,
0.1363717019557953,
0.021567320451140404,
-0.03915013000369072,
-0.05913686379790306,
-0.09879039973020554,
-0.018780559301376343,
0.00248673465102911,
0.054699018597602844,
-0.011083651334047318,
-0.028597814962267876,
-0.09844985604286194,
0.015590936876833439,
0.04167876020073891,
-0.0319259949028492,
0.008251913823187351,
0.07710124552249908,
0.08717795461416245,
-0.07216308265924454,
0.02871578186750412,
0.021039072424173355,
-0.1004226878285408,
0.0029122927226126194,
-0.020870771259069443,
-0.07474274188280106,
-0.010064792819321156,
0.023102080449461937,
-0.03169277682900429,
-0.06420322507619858,
-0.025016071274876595,
0.08665275573730469,
-0.06855589151382446,
0.021014563739299774,
0.02095870114862919,
-0.02847176417708397,
-0.05762385576963425,
0.03650432452559471,
0.08021409064531326,
0.014549396932125092,
-0.024421285837888718,
0.061966583132743835,
0.012961499392986298,
-0.01714061200618744,
0.07595839351415634,
-0.011272182688117027,
0.021110719069838524,
0.04757406562566757,
0.03402979299426079,
0.060465965420007706,
0.012996714562177658,
0.049041781574487686,
-0.07004757970571518,
0.0389099195599556,
0.08636029809713364,
-0.10937077552080154,
0.08608194440603256,
0.0006569577963091433,
0.04961509257555008,
0.0007699110428802669,
0.017530884593725204,
0.011113764718174934,
-0.06360111385583878,
0.03372028470039368,
0.009452550671994686,
0.07051646709442139,
-0.005353624001145363,
-3.957248467455459e-33,
-0.0069380467757582664,
0.09776278585195541,
-0.032472874969244,
-0.002124371938407421,
-0.000025582723537809215,
0.0074157011695206165,
0.031666263937950134,
-0.006664272863417864,
0.0414307564496994,
0.13325738906860352,
-0.012378785759210587,
-0.027360083535313606,
-0.009383880533277988,
0.010068213567137718,
-0.03188600763678551,
0.02833321876823902,
0.037068795412778854,
-0.0021145669743418694,
-0.0632522776722908,
-0.0034737074747681618,
-0.02670435979962349,
0.10576801002025604,
0.0045331306755542755,
0.06176905333995819,
0.03152092546224594,
0.043975360691547394,
-0.09941243380308151,
-0.027494342997670174,
-0.05409463867545128,
0.015276496298611164,
-0.07675276696681976,
-0.05192815139889717,
-0.08018570393323898,
0.030297884717583656,
-0.03778596222400665,
-0.058556150645017624,
-0.017621368169784546,
-0.04068054258823395,
0.02591906301677227,
0.008985758759081364,
0.09541784971952438,
0.01494872011244297,
-0.00587684940546751,
0.01595565676689148,
0.0326162725687027,
-0.07446971535682678,
0.03821193799376488,
-0.08273840695619583,
0.05589919537305832,
-0.05391441285610199,
0.04094162583351135,
0.05654974281787872,
-0.10163673758506775,
0.02285350300371647,
-0.0052457875572144985,
0.021678242832422256,
0.06109928712248802,
0.0013795908307656646,
-0.09515758603811264,
-0.022856850177049637,
0.06110333278775215,
0.0410885214805603,
0.0341857373714447,
0.0795246809720993,
0.02322590909898281,
0.01739857904613018,
0.1122012510895729,
-0.16627167165279388,
0.06305767595767975,
-0.07041862607002258,
0.04081254079937935,
-0.052679549902677536,
-0.002921608742326498,
-0.017714254558086395,
-0.05044819787144661,
0.053311292082071304,
0.03511795774102211,
0.007171036209911108,
-0.047160081565380096,
0.03969854488968849,
-0.06495340168476105,
-0.023282920941710472,
-0.030822264030575752,
-0.04949384555220604,
-0.12978783249855042,
-0.04922768473625183,
0.025371620431542397,
0.003984623122960329,
-0.03648274019360542,
0.09001904726028442,
-0.12349432706832886,
0.021096063777804375,
-0.05543425306677818,
-0.011166597716510296,
0.02720545046031475,
-6.90220929300267e-8,
0.0396353118121624,
-0.0016374400584027171,
-0.016876066103577614,
-0.02415965497493744,
-0.006365147884935141,
-0.11313918977975845,
-0.01849585585296154,
0.04015858471393585,
0.0026019448414444923,
0.09223698079586029,
0.07092030346393585,
-0.04899681732058525,
-0.03514765202999115,
0.04493549466133118,
-0.025676840916275978,
-0.00925111211836338,
-0.05086200684309006,
0.05438150465488434,
0.0051558371633291245,
-0.04718824103474617,
0.11048949509859085,
0.10165026783943176,
-0.039389174431562424,
0.022842759266495705,
0.0007227888563647866,
0.018783297389745712,
-0.04197743535041809,
0.027425620704889297,
0.009269611909985542,
0.04272862896323204,
0.051837652921676636,
-0.012574742548167706,
-0.0063739074394106865,
-0.13094769418239594,
-0.030341435223817825,
-0.04659203439950943,
0.01631775125861168,
0.03135468810796738,
-0.0752473920583725,
0.0499902106821537,
0.030299533158540726,
-0.011175167746841908,
-0.04285513609647751,
0.027365723624825478,
0.05775287374854088,
-0.06755331158638,
-0.12102334946393967,
0.013004082255065441,
0.022771282121539116,
-0.04637332260608673,
0.019362950697541237,
-0.01764107309281826,
0.04170726612210274,
-0.010347534902393818,
0.03420168533921242,
-0.008458786644041538,
-0.01885046251118183,
0.004605845082551241,
-0.0870237946510315,
-0.03958464413881302,
0.033608388155698776,
-0.088229700922966,
-0.02186775393784046,
-0.01634269207715988
] | {
"pdf_file": "YCFQUUS35NVOW5GBRHUQLBG5Z6WV7CL4.pdf",
"text": "16PRODUCTIVITY AND RELATED DATA, BUSINESS SECTOR\nPeriodOutput per hour of\nall personsOutput1 Hours of all\npersons2Compensation per\nhour3Real compensation\nper hour4Unit labor\ncostsImplicit price\ndeflator5\nBusiness\nsectorNonfarm\nbusiness\nsectorBusiness\nsectorNonfarm\nbusiness\nsectorBusiness\nsectorNonfarm\nbusiness\nsectorBusiness\nsectorNonfarm\nbusiness\nsectorBusiness\nsectorNonfarm\nbusiness\nsectorBusiness\nsectorNonfarm\nbusiness\nsectorBusiness\nsectorNonfarm\nbusiness\nsector\nIndexes, 1992=100; quarterly data seasonally adjusted\n1993 ........................ 100.5 100.5 103.1 103.3 102.6 102.9 102.5 102.2 100.0 99.7 101.9 101.7 102.2 102.2\n1994 ........................ 101.9 101.8 108.1 108.2 106.2 106.2 104.5 104.3 99.9 99.7 102.6 102.5 104.0 104.1\n1995 ........................ 102.6 102.8 111.5 111.8 108.7 108.8 106.7 106.6 99.6 99.4 104.1 103.7 106.0 106.1\n1996 ........................ 105.4 105.4 116.4 116.7 110.4 110.7 110.1 109.8 100.1 99.8 104.5 104.2 107.7 107.6\n1997 ........................ 107.8 107.5 122.5 122.7 113.6 114.1 113.5 113.1 101.0 100.6 105.3 105.2 109.7 109.8\n1998 ........................ 110.6 110.3 128.5 128.8 116.2 116.8 119.7 119.1 105.0 104.5 108.2 108.0 110.6 110.8\n1999 ........................ 113.5 112.9 134.5 134.8 118.5 119.4 125.2 124.3 107.6 106.8 110.3 110.1 111.6 112.1\n2000 ........................ 116.9 116.2 140.0 140.2 119.7 120.6 133.8 133.0 111.2 110.6 114.4 114.4 113.5 114.1\n2001 ........................ 118.2 117.5 139.8 140.1 118.2 119.2 137.7 136.6 111.4 110.5 116.5 116.3 115.8 116.3\n2002* ...................... 123.8 123.1 143.5 143.9 115.9 116.9 141.8 140.5 112.8 111.8 114.5 114.1 116.3 116.8\n1999: I ................... 112.7 112.1 132.4 132.7 117.4 118.4 124.1 123.2 107.7 106.9 110.2 109.9 111.2 111.5\nII .................. 112.5 111.9 133.0 133.3 118.2 119.1 124.3 123.4 107.1 106.3 110.5 110.3 111.5 111.9\nIII ................ 113.6 112.9 134.9 135.3 118.8 119.8 125.4 124.5 107.3 106.6 110.4 110.3 111.8 112.3\nIV ................. 115.2 114.7 137.7 138.0 119.5 120.4 127.0 126.3 107.8 107.2 110.2 110.1 112.1 112.6\n2000: I ................... 115.3 114.7 138.4 138.7 120.1 120.9 131.4 130.8 110.5 110.0 114.0 114.0 112.8 113.4\nII .................. 117.2 116.4 140.3 140.5 119.7 120.7 132.4 131.5 110.5 109.8 113.0 113.0 113.4 113.9\nIII ................ 117.3 116.6 140.4 140.6 119.7 120.6 135.0 134.3 111.7 111.1 115.1 115.2 113.7 114.3\nIV ................. 117.9 117.1 140.7 141.0 119.4 120.4 136.3 135.3 111.9 111.2 115.6 115.6 114.3 114.8\n2001: I ................... 117.5 116.7 140.4 140.7 119.5 120.6 137.3 136.3 111.8 110.9 116.9 116.8 115.2 115.7\nII .................. 117.4 116.6 139.4 139.7 118.7 119.8 137.5 136.3 111.0 110.1 117.1 116.9 115.8 116.3\nIII ................ 117.9 117.2 139.1 139.4 117.9 118.9 137.8 136.7 111.1 110.2 116.8 116.6 116.4 116.8\nIV ................. 120.1 119.3 140.3 140.4 116.8 117.7 138.3 137.2 111.6 110.7 115.1 115.0 115.9 116.5\n2002: I ................... 122.5 121.8 142.3 142.5 116.1 117.0 139.3r138.1 112.0 111.1 113.7 113.4 116.0 116.4\nII ................. 123.1 122.3 142.5 142.9 115.8 116.8 140.8 139.5r112.3 111.2 114.4r114.1 116.2 116.8\nIIIr............... 124.8 123.9 144.4 144.7 115.6 116.8 142.7 141.3 113.2 112.1 114.3 114.0 116.3 116.9\nIV * .............. 124.9 124.2 145.0 145.3 116.1 117.0 144.2 142.9 113.8 112.8 115.4 115.1 116.7 117.2\nPercent change; quarterly data at seasonally adjusted annual rates\n1993 ........................ 0.5 0.5 3.1 3.3 2.6 2.9 2.5 2.2 0.0 ¥0.3 1.9 1.7 2.2 2.2\n1994 ........................ 1.3 1.3 4.9 4.7 3.5 3.3 2.0 2.1 ¥.1 .0 .7 .8 1.8 1.9\n1995 ........................ .7 .9 3.1 3.4 2.4 2.4 2.1 2.1 ¥.3¥.3 1.4 1.2 2.0 2.0\n1996 ........................ 2.8 2.5 4.4 4.3 1.6 1.7 3.2 3.1 .5 .4 .4 .5 1.6 1.4\n1997 ........................ 2.3 2.0 5.2 5.1 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.0 .9 .8 .8 .9 1.8 2.1\n1998 ........................ 2.6 2.6 4.9 5.0 2.2 2.4 5.5 5.4 4.0 3.9 2.8 2.7 .8 .9\n1999 ........................ 2.6 2.4 4.7 4.6 2.0 2.2 4.6 4.4 2.4 2.2 1.9 2.0 1.0 1.2\n2000 ........................ 3.0 2.9 4.1 4.0 1.0 1.0 6.8 7.0 3.4 3.5 3.7 3.9 1.7 1.8\n2001 ........................ 1.1 1.1 ¥.2¥.1¥1.3¥1.2 2.9 2.7 .2 ¥.1 1.8 1.6 2.0 1.9\n2002 * ...................... 4.8 4.8 2.7 2.7 ¥2.0¥2.0 2.9 2.8 1.3 1.2 ¥1.7¥1.9 .4 .5\n1999: I ................... 3.1 2.4 3.4 3.3 .2 .9 8.2 7.3 6.5 5.5 5.0 4.8 1.3 1.4\nII .................. ¥.6¥.8 2.1 1.9 2.7 2.6 .5 .6 ¥2.3¥2.2 1.1 1.3 1.0 1.5\nIII ................ 3.8 3.7 5.9 6.0 2.0 2.2 3.7 3.7 .8 .8 ¥.1 .0 1.2 1.4\nIV ................. 5.8 6.3 8.4 8.3 2.4 1.9 5.1 5.8 1.7 2.5 ¥.7¥.5 1.1 1.3\n2000: I ................... .3 .2 2.2 1.9 1.9 1.7 14.7 15.2 10.3 10.7 14.4 14.9 2.4 2.7\nII .................. 6.7 6.0 5.4 5.4 ¥1.2¥.6 3.0 2.2r.1¥.7¥3.5¥3.6 2.2 1.9\nIII ................ .4 .6 .4 .2 .0 ¥.4 8.3 8.7 4.6 4.9 7.8 8.0 1.1 1.4\nIV ................. 2.1 1.7 .9 1.1 ¥1.2¥.6 3.7 3.1 .7 .2 1.6 1.4 1.9 1.6\n2001: I ................... ¥1.5r¥1.4¥1.0¥.9 .4 .5 3.1 2.8 ¥.6¥.9 4.7 4.3 3.4 3.3\nII .................. ¥.2¥.1¥2.8¥2.7¥2.6¥2.6 .5 .1 ¥2.6¥2.9 .7 .3 2.2 2.0\nIII ................ 1.8 2.1 ¥.9¥.8¥2.6¥2.9 .9 1.0 .2 .3 ¥.9¥1.1 1.8 1.7\nIV ................. 7.6r7.2 3.5 2.9r¥3.8r¥4.0 1.4 1.5 1.7 1.8 ¥5.8¥5.4¥1.6¥1.0\n2002: I ................... 8.3 8.6 5.9 6.2 ¥2.2r¥2.3 3.0 2.9r1.7r1.6¥4.9¥5.3 .3 ¥.2\nII ................. 1.8 1.7 .6 .9 ¥1.2¥.7r4.3r4.0 .8r.4 2.4r2.3 .7 1.4\nIIIr............... 5.8 5.5 5.3 5.2 ¥.5¥.2 5.7 5.4 3.5 3.1 .0 ¥.1 .5 .1\nIV * .............. .3 .8 1.8 1.7 1.5 .9 4.2 4.6 2.2 2.5 3.9 3.8 1.3 1.2\n1Output refers to real gross domestic product originating in the sector.\n2Hours of all persons engaged in the sector, including hours of proprietors and unpaid family\nworkers. Estimates based primarily on establishment data.\n3Wages and salaries of employees plus employers’ contributions for social insurance and pri-\nvate benefit plans. Also includes an estimate of wages, salaries, and supplemental payments forthe self-employed.\n4Hourly compensation divided by the consumer price index for all urban consumers (CPI–\nU) for recent quarters. The trend from 1978–2001 is based on the consumer price index re-search series (CPI–U–RS).\n5Current dollar gross domestic output divided by the output index. NOTE.—Data relate to all persons engaged in the sector.\nPercent changes are from preceding period and are based on original data; they therefore\nmay differ slightly from percent changes based on indexes shown here.\n* Data based on GDP data released February 28, 2003.Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics."
} |
[
-0.03335445374250412,
0.004442586563527584,
-0.08431071788072586,
-0.03321762755513191,
-0.05593138188123703,
0.02514740824699402,
0.02159227430820465,
0.03134512901306152,
-0.00882481224834919,
0.02405458129942417,
0.006243641022592783,
-0.03058883547782898,
0.054805271327495575,
-0.030284561216831207,
-0.04136558622121811,
-0.04766543209552765,
0.025335652753710747,
-0.0628252774477005,
-0.05552947148680687,
0.10131452977657318,
0.039463043212890625,
-0.001019891700707376,
-0.0561983548104763,
-0.04864699766039848,
0.03812192752957344,
-0.013359385542571545,
-0.00873875617980957,
-0.06474431604146957,
-0.014110772870481014,
-0.06435227394104004,
-0.0458059199154377,
0.022887583822011948,
-0.034169916063547134,
-0.04735260829329491,
0.08742307126522064,
0.01493642758578062,
0.03802868723869324,
0.002002920489758253,
-0.0243997722864151,
0.005741094704717398,
-0.00022384239127859473,
-0.010712828487157822,
0.018875638023018837,
-0.06621057540178299,
0.031992971897125244,
0.07149165123701096,
0.058494050055742264,
-0.05326913669705391,
0.0514330118894577,
0.0097352908924222,
-0.04948441684246063,
-0.005704660899937153,
-0.011947055347263813,
0.05237347632646561,
-0.04999326914548874,
0.005751283373683691,
0.059545233845710754,
-0.01362667791545391,
-0.06558071821928024,
0.04962542653083801,
-0.03799094632267952,
0.05258512124419212,
0.028476137667894363,
-0.002305766101926565,
0.08720178157091141,
0.09994889050722122,
-0.0697922557592392,
-0.06134697422385216,
-0.0676678866147995,
-0.07937831431627274,
0.023760568350553513,
-0.062015555799007416,
-0.10560046881437302,
-0.04577919840812683,
0.03409216180443764,
-0.04252324998378754,
-0.04269971698522568,
0.04916636645793915,
0.06601981818675995,
-0.10511510074138641,
-0.0518815703690052,
-0.03886765241622925,
0.007048033643513918,
0.011607029475271702,
0.020944518968462944,
-0.02474469691514969,
-0.04743862897157669,
-0.03707627207040787,
0.03623590245842934,
-0.012233289889991283,
0.08236120641231537,
-0.06498513370752335,
0.10847906023263931,
-0.05874844267964363,
-0.007289798930287361,
0.01874532364308834,
0.0008930647745728493,
0.007660269737243652,
0.03611340746283531,
0.01951277256011963,
-0.006807592231780291,
-0.04287222400307655,
-0.012065689079463482,
0.03625156730413437,
-0.11700582504272461,
0.014137513004243374,
0.004967481829226017,
0.056286923587322235,
-0.12064505368471146,
0.03419693931937218,
0.05899538844823837,
0.08131182938814163,
-0.03780857473611832,
-0.1371448040008545,
0.02694869413971901,
-0.01811985671520233,
-0.060217004269361496,
-0.07995016127824783,
0.07118043303489685,
-0.03032747469842434,
0.011104202829301357,
0.04551775008440018,
0.0011218579020351171,
0.062069885432720184,
0.011132506653666496,
0.039193522185087204,
-0.03696553036570549,
-3.0635164391054277e-33,
-0.10328949987888336,
0.000513646868057549,
0.0014832500601187348,
0.023885516449809074,
-0.06239248439669609,
-0.01487993635237217,
0.07299500703811646,
0.018142102286219597,
-0.010745459236204624,
0.007987081073224545,
-0.020821092650294304,
0.057204145938158035,
-0.03866340219974518,
-0.019891416653990746,
-0.004728298168629408,
-0.023410089313983917,
-0.02793917804956436,
0.017730101943016052,
0.05005452781915665,
-0.024893585592508316,
0.056666888296604156,
-0.06851037591695786,
0.04226858168840408,
0.018910057842731476,
0.03895709663629532,
-0.0008336629834957421,
-0.03897852078080177,
0.049091871827840805,
-0.0666438490152359,
0.011450325138866901,
0.07876058667898178,
-0.03361339122056961,
0.054480936378240585,
0.01705373264849186,
-0.07478932291269302,
0.0029201838187873363,
-0.09215432405471802,
0.0014702550834044814,
-0.07628484070301056,
0.0019149803556501865,
0.0028122346848249435,
-0.034937627613544464,
-0.049405019730329514,
0.036520566791296005,
0.02897864207625389,
0.027791474014520645,
0.07506696879863739,
0.017176970839500427,
0.008522669784724712,
-0.03076028823852539,
-0.06504376232624054,
0.000021658877813024446,
-0.025599859654903412,
0.018250979483127594,
-0.02299162745475769,
-0.020277947187423706,
0.02114884741604328,
-0.04201161861419678,
-0.07504241913557053,
-0.0445326492190361,
0.017902521416544914,
-0.024334197863936424,
-0.07435307651758194,
0.004702760837972164,
-0.060996223241090775,
0.010912350378930569,
0.05274207890033722,
0.03248538076877594,
0.08819027990102768,
-0.07844506949186325,
-0.03146175295114517,
-0.07259473204612732,
0.07956532388925552,
0.04500005394220352,
0.08570941537618637,
-0.015628475695848465,
-0.042301926761865616,
0.015788979828357697,
-0.09258860349655151,
-0.0025015491992235184,
-0.09898794442415237,
-0.05187947675585747,
-0.07350094616413116,
0.046904947608709335,
0.022126080468297005,
-0.01904754899442196,
0.05793226510286331,
-0.03423282131552696,
-0.05664902180433273,
-0.08169377595186234,
0.00476854108273983,
-0.0616193450987339,
-0.00788681861013174,
0.10660441219806671,
0.0845300555229187,
-6.217534922964633e-33,
0.05413765087723732,
-0.03646618500351906,
0.01977628469467163,
-0.03628969565033913,
0.02624502405524254,
-0.07729151844978333,
0.019358620047569275,
-0.07018939405679703,
0.03677123412489891,
-0.010500441305339336,
-0.03818051517009735,
-0.07680298388004303,
-0.015932487323880196,
-0.034467440098524094,
-0.019308172166347504,
0.01844860054552555,
-0.03699842095375061,
-0.06706900894641876,
-0.003502244595438242,
0.04655226692557335,
-0.09053195267915726,
0.05703987181186676,
0.06535806506872177,
0.03344189003109932,
-0.03345112502574921,
-0.012297703884541988,
-0.07814674824476242,
-0.06116583198308945,
0.006549930199980736,
-0.01148088276386261,
-0.09200109541416168,
-0.05858130007982254,
0.002874066587537527,
0.09157264977693558,
-0.10592228919267654,
-0.1475178301334381,
0.017316101118922234,
-0.03971167281270027,
-0.024186505004763603,
0.06062911078333855,
0.09579956531524658,
-0.0119618009775877,
0.014569985680282116,
0.10831878334283829,
-0.00011212685058126226,
-0.036146942526102066,
-0.02381000481545925,
-0.07278656214475632,
0.018649335950613022,
-0.07585465908050537,
0.011485337279736996,
-0.028323180973529816,
-0.01548688393086195,
-0.031108301132917404,
0.010104096494615078,
0.06386874616146088,
0.09510762244462967,
0.01976175419986248,
-0.10695284605026245,
-0.01133838202804327,
0.0402829684317112,
0.006438134238123894,
0.016905538737773895,
0.045309051871299744,
0.06805572658777237,
-0.009968318976461887,
-0.06953861564397812,
-0.06276809424161911,
-0.03899750858545303,
-0.0016317431582137942,
-0.08182808011770248,
-0.057659607380628586,
0.03826320916414261,
-0.02676631323993206,
0.07270092517137527,
0.007553451228886843,
0.011271159164607525,
0.005926748737692833,
0.046760160475969315,
-0.049204885959625244,
-0.11740926653146744,
-0.07226160168647766,
-0.08960969001054764,
0.04030415415763855,
-0.053246740251779556,
0.009482201188802719,
-0.0034803668968379498,
-0.1253996342420578,
0.05908838286995888,
0.029931891709566116,
-0.1492072194814682,
0.03598693385720253,
0.07804764807224274,
-0.03290966525673866,
-0.022160999476909637,
-5.4340709709777e-8,
0.012889374047517776,
0.025830218568444252,
-0.0018486527260392904,
0.0037398897111415863,
0.03126960247755051,
-0.015194935724139214,
-0.07107405364513397,
0.011677049100399017,
-0.0787661075592041,
0.012313987128436565,
-0.026900146156549454,
0.023412682116031647,
-0.015712231397628784,
-0.05922212451696396,
-0.05487529933452606,
-0.09475764632225037,
-0.029351405799388885,
0.02308635413646698,
-0.024919357150793076,
-0.12412463873624802,
0.03258730098605156,
-0.058782849460840225,
0.04435192048549652,
-0.003945793025195599,
-0.06845340877771378,
-0.052364300936460495,
-0.05667458474636078,
-0.003973087295889854,
0.09829261898994446,
0.034167297184467316,
-0.0002920321130659431,
-0.019165944308042526,
0.0330299511551857,
-0.019362851977348328,
0.03816453740000725,
0.005703622475266457,
0.032898299396038055,
0.01825396902859211,
-0.00255763647146523,
-0.000009245340152119752,
-0.04644422233104706,
-0.01909109577536583,
-0.02487545646727085,
0.04477520287036896,
0.03869633004069328,
0.006296481937170029,
-0.08849874138832092,
-0.038451723754405975,
0.05876540020108223,
-0.03208259865641594,
0.013936442323029041,
-0.0962282344698906,
-0.008064133115112782,
0.09970258176326752,
0.01816992275416851,
0.023322900757193565,
0.021027421578764915,
-0.05694965645670891,
0.020283063873648643,
0.06048686057329178,
0.012041080743074417,
0.038455549627542496,
-0.008754104375839233,
0.018363874405622482
] | {
"pdf_file": "FGQNTPYB75NQ2BY4HIIFBTVHYQBOX44W.pdf",
"text": "State of Idaho Fixed Asset System (FAS) \nOffice of the State Controller FAS Manual \nDivision of Statewide Accounting \n_____________________________________________________________________________________________ \n \n_____________________________________________________________________________________________ \n \nFAS Manual Transferring an Asset FIXED ASSET MANUAL .............................................................. 1 \nTRANSFERRING AN ASSET TO ANOTHER AGENCY .............. 1 \nINTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1 \nTO TRANSFER AN ASSET WITH A BOOK VALUE OF LESS THAN $5,000 ........... 1 \nTO TRANSFER AN ASSET WITH A BOOK VALUE OF $5,000 OR MORE .............. 2 \n \nRev. Date: 05/26/2005 TOC Page 1 \n \n State of Idaho Capital Asset M anagement System \nOffice of the State Controller FAS Manual \nDivision of Statewide Accounting \n_____________________________________________________________________________________________ \n \n_____________________________________________________________________________________________ \n FIXED ASSET MANUAL \nTRANSFERRING AN ASSET TO \nANOTHER AGENCY \nINTRODUCTION \nTransferring an asset between agencies simply m eans that one agency sends an asset to another \nagency. The agency transferring the asset out is referred to as the \"transfer out\" agency and the \nagency receiving the asset is referr ed to as the \"receiving agency\". \n \nThe book value of the asset is an important factor in determining how to record the transaction. \nIf the book value of the asset is less than $5,000, the agency transf erring will treat the transaction \nas a disposition, e.g., a donation or scrap, us ing transaction codes DD1 through DD4, depending \non the class of asset. The receiving agency can enter the acquisition by whatever method seems \nappropriate. \nIf the book value of the asse t is $5,000 or more, both ag encies should contact the DSAHelpline \nfor assistance. \nTO TRANSFER AN ASSET WITH A BOOK VALUE OF LESS \nTHAN $5,000 \nThe transfer out agency should dispose of the asset using the following steps: \n1. Type 35 at the FAS Main Menu and press ENTER. \n2. Enter an A in the FUNCTION field, and enter the property number and component \nnumber in the PROP NO and COMP NO fields. Confirm that the property and \ncomponent number exactly match the record in the FAS Property File (i.e., screen S040). \n3. Enter the sequence number (usually 0001) in the SEQ NO field. \n4. Enter the transaction code ( FAS TC) for the class code of the property number being \ndisposed. The FAS TC will be DD1, DD2, DD3, or DD 4. (Refer to FAS Descriptor \nTable 15.) \n5. Enter the status code in the STATUS field. \nFor a full disposition, enter the following: \n• D (disposed) \n6. Enter a disposition code (e.g., S (if Sold), D (donated or scrapped), etc.) in the DSP \nMTH field. (Refer to FAS Descriptor Table 22 for more disposition codes.) \n7. Enter the amount of cash act ually received in the ADT AMT field. \n8. Enter the three-digit number representing the pe rcentage of the asset being disposed in \nthe DISP % field. For a full disposition, enter 100. \n9. Enter the disposition date in the ADT DATE field. \nFAS Manual Transferring an Asset \nRev. Date: 05/26/2005 Page 1 \n State of Idaho Capital Asset M anagement System \nOffice of the State Controller FAS Manual \nDivision of Statewide Accounting \n_____________________________________________________________________________________________ \n \n_____________________________________________________________________________________________ \n 10. Enter the quantity in the QTY field. For a full disposition, the quantity should equal that \nof the asset in the FAS Property File. \n11. Press F1 or ENTER to post the record to the FAS Property File. \n• If you do not have disposition-release author ity (i.e., approval level 3 or lower), \n'INVALID APPROVAL LEVEL' will appear in the message section of the screen, \nand the status in the FAS Hold File record will be ' H'. \n• If you have disposition-release authority (i .e., approval level 4 or greater), 'RECORD \nADDED' will appear in the message secti on of the screen and there will be a ' P' in the \nFAS Hold File record. \n \nThe receiving agency should enter the acquisition using standard acquisition steps. Click here for \nsteps to enter acquisitions. \nTO TRANSFER AN ASSET WITH A BOOK VALUE OF $5,000 \nOR MORE \nFor either transferring out or receiving the asset, contact the DSAHelpline for assistance. \nFAS Manual Transferring an Asset \nRev. Date: 05/26/2005 Page 2 \n "
} |
[
-0.09872691333293915,
0.05892179533839226,
0.07573071867227554,
0.005645531229674816,
0.031026629731059074,
0.05288036912679672,
-0.005663550458848476,
0.026163429021835327,
0.02774166688323021,
0.00022744821035303175,
0.1186077743768692,
0.0075994497165083885,
-0.02239885739982128,
-0.04308471828699112,
-0.06574775278568268,
0.050212934613227844,
0.0016596957575529814,
-0.03519371151924133,
-0.02385268732905388,
0.029172765091061592,
0.019018059596419334,
0.12337880581617355,
-0.04069187492132187,
0.011848251335322857,
0.004250072408467531,
0.03551442548632622,
-0.13418719172477722,
0.023372704163193703,
-0.03468434885144234,
-0.07244905829429626,
0.004000465851277113,
0.12501363456249237,
0.0086382906883955,
-0.02361653558909893,
0.10829146206378937,
0.059618473052978516,
0.02609611675143242,
-0.03313186392188072,
0.050356462597846985,
0.03636334091424942,
-0.02163270302116871,
-0.05337787792086601,
0.03534465655684471,
0.002891791518777609,
-0.02374935708940029,
0.05636361613869667,
-0.03115757927298546,
0.02727881819009781,
-0.048112690448760986,
0.06603103876113892,
-0.0076366872526705265,
0.011481144465506077,
0.021932771429419518,
0.049010638147592545,
0.030139440670609474,
0.0024672888685017824,
-0.00617325259372592,
-0.0141106266528368,
-0.009939514100551605,
-0.0640183612704277,
-0.000025520328563288786,
0.03928321227431297,
-0.035163283348083496,
-0.04676179960370064,
-0.036238882690668106,
-0.0746920183300972,
0.01757572405040264,
-0.029082678258419037,
-0.020775383338332176,
0.015736930072307587,
0.009668080136179924,
-0.038852233439683914,
-0.08426366746425629,
0.06765022873878479,
-0.08122947067022324,
0.09370358288288116,
-0.015161599032580853,
0.03288496658205986,
0.03229299560189247,
-0.14051729440689087,
-0.007581676356494427,
-0.07688925415277481,
0.027550170198082924,
-0.023493483662605286,
-0.017807357013225555,
-0.05566910281777382,
-0.04609254002571106,
-0.006019813008606434,
0.08404538780450821,
0.07424696534872055,
0.08371101319789886,
-0.07168017327785492,
0.11255507171154022,
0.07521413266658783,
-0.03219587728381157,
-0.031194809824228287,
-0.03150754049420357,
0.06702630966901779,
0.03570248931646347,
0.10712795704603195,
0.04525100439786911,
0.08004676550626755,
-0.07569049298763275,
-0.02609756961464882,
-0.04578240215778351,
-0.007028416730463505,
-0.0017970596672967076,
0.08033768832683563,
-0.049904730170965195,
-0.022203238680958748,
0.015244717709720135,
0.012666289694607258,
0.009134767577052116,
-0.08444998413324356,
-0.041994478553533554,
0.005276711657643318,
-0.027740521356463432,
0.0004130666784476489,
0.03158429265022278,
-0.05349820479750633,
0.03809674084186554,
-0.00010378332808613777,
-0.1047399714589119,
0.005740795750170946,
-0.05209106206893921,
0.008658702485263348,
0.04125337302684784,
1.1058817223033855e-32,
0.052417438477277756,
0.013777791522443295,
0.0044119395315647125,
-0.0017262011533603072,
0.01097961887717247,
-0.009226508438587189,
-0.06311479955911636,
-0.020202741026878357,
-0.0238450076431036,
-0.052671167999506,
-0.03904245048761368,
-0.02484719082713127,
0.04622185602784157,
-0.12941808998584747,
-0.10177040845155716,
-0.03979989141225815,
0.0191847812384367,
0.011019091121852398,
0.037122003734111786,
-0.01163430418819189,
0.07766254991292953,
-0.111618272960186,
-0.05284658819437027,
0.03677507862448692,
0.024420494213700294,
0.06008194014430046,
-0.0017063790000975132,
-0.027896499261260033,
-0.02520999126136303,
0.020045850425958633,
0.04179036244750023,
0.06111874803900719,
0.04757537692785263,
0.006640046834945679,
0.1089821457862854,
-0.012397960759699345,
-0.0028475821018218994,
-0.028928160667419434,
-0.05912165716290474,
-0.021126363426446915,
0.06275114417076111,
-0.0054235560819506645,
-0.03943352401256561,
-0.020612401887774467,
0.019660472869873047,
-0.033763643354177475,
-0.042615216225385666,
0.029759760946035385,
0.029721904546022415,
-0.03169664368033409,
-0.007347176317125559,
0.009273234754800797,
0.010687550529837608,
0.017220618203282356,
-0.027081888169050217,
0.030675020068883896,
0.02049063704907894,
0.010821770876646042,
-0.010181296616792679,
0.003673845436424017,
0.06740681827068329,
0.1006491556763649,
-0.02318607084453106,
-0.043487850576639175,
-0.025687139481306076,
-0.04773800075054169,
-0.0049483804032206535,
0.007513605523854494,
-0.03939121589064598,
-0.06367921084165573,
0.013279101811349392,
0.029976528137922287,
0.10753204673528671,
0.09143450111150742,
-0.0395917072892189,
-0.06693000346422195,
0.003099945606663823,
0.07068116962909698,
0.02417943626642227,
-0.031583819538354874,
-0.07192502915859222,
0.014404146000742912,
-0.009779130108654499,
0.01706744357943535,
0.01188654825091362,
-0.030308609828352928,
0.027029402554035187,
-0.007005653809756041,
-0.038885898888111115,
0.033279772847890854,
-0.05094980075955391,
0.020032821223139763,
-0.07246756553649902,
0.05734173208475113,
-0.006560817360877991,
-1.0778902630744298e-32,
-0.01789667084813118,
0.020359445363283157,
-0.01079492922872305,
-0.0265547726303339,
-0.039774466305971146,
0.010456990450620651,
0.044652778655290604,
0.07364249974489212,
0.04973040148615837,
-0.029361315071582794,
-0.0057665142230689526,
-0.03534623235464096,
-0.01868349313735962,
-0.007674679160118103,
-0.036850687116384506,
0.014143752865493298,
-0.008637583814561367,
-0.013540109619498253,
-0.10811033099889755,
0.0342252217233181,
0.07973846048116684,
0.03194960951805115,
-0.04820524528622627,
0.11149995774030685,
-0.06311096996068954,
0.024427177384495735,
0.05538483336567879,
-0.06311427056789398,
0.012838536873459816,
0.023327570408582687,
-0.029312076047062874,
-0.08314450830221176,
-0.03521065413951874,
0.03634745255112648,
-0.02806917019188404,
-0.08163224905729294,
0.06861329078674316,
-0.021063191816210747,
-0.018205929547548294,
0.001954602310433984,
0.06326032429933548,
0.10018477588891983,
-0.08640505373477936,
0.018597513437271118,
0.033000241965055466,
-0.0340612418949604,
-0.01046315673738718,
-0.07141026109457016,
0.057815562933683395,
-0.05300365388393402,
-0.02675779163837433,
-0.02259257435798645,
0.03027098812162876,
0.0817079022526741,
-0.0004619200772140175,
0.03201092407107353,
0.05122195556759834,
-0.06899438053369522,
-0.05141692981123924,
-0.020020337775349617,
0.021070240065455437,
0.0867561474442482,
-0.023303290829062462,
-0.07672598212957382,
0.13260893523693085,
-0.04127996042370796,
-0.013802447356283665,
-0.05699842423200607,
0.08982919156551361,
-0.10572220385074615,
0.03064355067908764,
-0.0679025948047638,
-0.057584136724472046,
-0.08184938132762909,
0.10470087081193924,
-0.021995708346366882,
0.03414113447070122,
0.021694611757993698,
-0.09593070298433304,
0.033697277307510376,
0.009846960194408894,
0.00919592846184969,
-0.006681441329419613,
0.17118202149868011,
-0.02424662932753563,
-0.04743022844195366,
0.005848758853971958,
-0.03239528462290764,
0.0185010377317667,
-0.012318088673055172,
-0.014259821735322475,
-0.05815618857741356,
0.013235149905085564,
0.12143078446388245,
-0.02411816082894802,
-6.660812346126477e-8,
-0.046003878116607666,
-0.009447314776480198,
-0.02470390871167183,
0.031943704932928085,
0.09670522063970566,
-0.04300393536686897,
-0.01315461378544569,
-0.028393657878041267,
-0.002066863002255559,
-0.07938044518232346,
0.007500112056732178,
0.04599706083536148,
-0.09601730108261108,
-0.14051440358161926,
0.027497097849845886,
-0.04134238883852959,
-0.12776976823806763,
0.04181022569537163,
-0.051308006048202515,
-0.04158249497413635,
0.015401874668896198,
-0.015007718466222286,
0.028434012085199356,
0.0038262545131146908,
-0.06172362342476845,
-0.05549183115363121,
0.02849576249718666,
0.02307838760316372,
0.014022345654666424,
-0.048582855612039566,
-0.03810960054397583,
0.034442752599716187,
0.038619350641965866,
-0.0845673456788063,
-0.04218710586428642,
-0.007066452410072088,
0.07003352046012878,
-0.039261914789676666,
0.024697715416550636,
0.049096256494522095,
-0.006437200121581554,
0.02746819518506527,
-0.041430093348026276,
0.052086684852838516,
0.04896005615592003,
-0.02545168437063694,
-0.04836631938815117,
-0.01309998705983162,
-0.016049092635512352,
-0.03070741891860962,
0.05976539105176926,
-0.006747046951204538,
0.029082342982292175,
0.05894126370549202,
-0.07578925788402557,
0.027638783678412437,
0.02205605059862137,
-0.019097696989774704,
-0.013900001533329487,
-0.032840482890605927,
0.11641721427440643,
-0.03470433130860329,
0.03647344931960106,
0.025082305073738098
] | {
"pdf_file": "BYSWSP7HQFGJC7GXW42C4H6RKIH3TAVQ.pdf",
"text": "MESSAGE NO: MESSAGE DATE: \n MESSAGE STATUS: CATEGORY: \nTYPE: PUBLIC NON-PUBLIC \nS U B - T Y P E : FR CITE: FR CITE DATE: \nREFERENCE \nMESSAGE # (s): \nCASE #(s): \n \nEFFECTIVE DATE: COURT CASE #: PERIOD OF REVIEW: TO \nPERIOD COVERED: TO \n \n3164303\n05/01/2011\n1259303, 3158307\n05/21/2013\n✔\nLIQ-Liquidation\nA-428-201\nActive\n78 FR 29702\nCOR-Correction\n06/13/2013\nAntidumping\n09/14/2011\n05/21/2013\nMessage Date: 06/13/2013 Message Number: 3164303 Page 1 of 4 Notice of Lifting of Suspension Date: 05/21/2013\n \n \nTO: { Directors Of Field Operations, Port Directors }\n \nFROM: { Director AD/CVD & Revenue Policy & Programs }\n \nRE: Correction of message 3158307, dated 06/07/2013 concerning the antidumping duty\norder on ball bearings and parts thereof from Germany (A-428-201)\n \n1. This is a correction to message 3158307, dated 06/07/2013, to correct paragraph 1. \n \n2. Paragraph 1 of message 3158307 contains incorrect information about the company-specific\ncase numbers. Below is the fully corrected message.\n \n3. For all shipments of ball bearings and parts thereof from Germany produced and/or exported\nby firms listed below and entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption during the\nperiod 05/01/2011 through 09/14/2011, liquidate all entries without regard to antidumping duties:\n \nProducer and/or Exporter: Audi AG\nCase Number: A-428-201-093\n \nProducer and/or Exporter: Bayerische Motoren Werke AG\nCase Number: A-428-201-000\n \nProducer and/or Exporter: Volkswagen AG\nCase Number: A-428-201-101\n \nProducer and/or Exporter: Volkswagen Zubehor GmbH\nCase Number: A-428-201-102\n \nProducer and/or Exporter: W&H Dentalwerk Burmoos GmbH \nCase Number: A-428-201-103\n \nCertain firms did not have their own case number during the period of review; entries may have\nbeen made under A-428-201-000 or other company-specific case numbers.\n \n4. Notice of the lifting of suspension of liquidation of entries of subject merchandise covered by\nparagraph 3 occurred with the publication of the final results of administrative review (78 FR\nMessage Date: 06/13/2013 Message Number: 3164303 Page 2 of 4 29702, 05/21/2013). The antidumping duty order on ball bearings and parts thereof from Germany\nwas revoked, effective 09/15/2011 (see message 1259303 dated 09/16/2011).\n \n5. There are no injunctions applicable to the entries covered by this instruction. \n \n6. The assessment of antidumping duties by CBP on shipments or entries of this merchandise is\nsubject to the provisions of section 778 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. Section 778\nrequires that CBP pay interest on overpayments or assess interest on underpayments of the\nrequired amounts deposited as estimated antidumping duties. The interest provisions are not\napplicable to cash or bonds posted as estimated antidumping duties before the date of publication\nof the antidumping duty order. Interest shall be calculated from the date payment of estimated\nantidumping duties is required through the date of liquidation. The rate at which such interest is\npayable is the rate in effect under section 6621 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 for such\nperiod.\n \n7. Upon assessment of antidumping duties, CBP shall require that the importer provide a\nreimbursement statement, as described in section 351.402(f)(2) of commerce’s regulations. The\nimporter should provide the reimbursement statement prior to liquidation of the entry. If the\nimporter certifies that it has an agreement with the producer, seller, or exporter, to be reimbursed\nantidumping duties, CBP shall double the antidumping duties in accordance with the above-\nreferenced regulation. Additionally, if the importer does not provide the reimbursement statement\nprior to liquidation, reimbursement shall be presumed and CBP shall double the antidumping\nduties due. If an importer timely files a protest challenging the presumption of reimbursement and\ndoubling of duties, consistent with CBP’s protest process, CBP may accept the reimbursement\nstatement filed with the protest to rebut the presumption of reimbursement. \n \n8. If there are any questions by the importing public regarding this message, please contact the\nCall Center for the Office of AD/CVD Operations, Import Administration, International Trade\nAdministration, U.S. Department of Commerce at (202) 482-0984. CBP ports should submit their\ninquiries through authorized CBP channels only. (This message was generated by O1:CC\ninitials.)\n \n9. There are no restrictions on the release of this information. \n \nMichael B. Walsh\n \n \nMessage Date: 06/13/2013 Message Number: 3164303 Page 3 of 4 Company Details\n \n*Party Indicator Value:\nI = Importer, M = Manufacturer, E = Exporter, S = Sold To Party\nMessage Date: 06/13/2013 Message Number: 3164303 Page 4 of 4"
} |
[
-0.010152778588235378,
0.040968313813209534,
0.05061042308807373,
-0.006499529350548983,
-0.05188233405351639,
0.06022042781114578,
0.011537072248756886,
-0.024203013628721237,
-0.028064584359526634,
0.0422871895134449,
-0.09229794144630432,
-0.008134068921208382,
0.09742765873670578,
-0.003904328914359212,
-0.004849114455282688,
0.001540251774713397,
0.0319756418466568,
-0.0464617982506752,
-0.08704335242509842,
0.05681861191987991,
-0.012024469673633575,
0.006626585964113474,
0.009566674008965492,
0.036559656262397766,
0.0013413741253316402,
-0.004496786743402481,
-0.039661578834056854,
0.007739520166069269,
0.05674343928694725,
0.029769938439130783,
0.05482570081949234,
-0.05201103165745735,
0.012426833622157574,
0.0581887811422348,
0.05240112915635109,
-0.08073769509792328,
-0.02153216116130352,
0.05257957801222801,
0.0067427149042487144,
-0.019154470413923264,
0.07955025136470795,
0.004127648193389177,
0.009148857556283474,
0.025639984756708145,
0.021383825689554214,
0.014061933383345604,
0.07007943093776703,
0.03981684148311615,
0.03804995119571686,
0.006270693615078926,
0.10652446746826172,
0.057314664125442505,
0.08220436424016953,
-0.05605585500597954,
-0.015988223254680634,
-0.0007558601791970432,
-0.08309512585401535,
-0.08369296789169312,
0.02702329307794571,
-0.018913330510258675,
-0.040684159845113754,
-0.07557131350040436,
-0.05680403858423233,
0.02240779995918274,
-0.07980332523584366,
0.008344852365553379,
-0.05751665681600571,
0.002160573611035943,
0.011580506339669228,
0.013972611166536808,
0.13367381691932678,
0.07949007302522659,
0.04161398112773895,
0.04088277369737625,
0.059823211282491684,
0.03429866582155228,
0.0622715950012207,
0.061115238815546036,
0.00046558823669329286,
-0.04464755952358246,
0.017617324367165565,
0.02125234715640545,
-0.025158021599054337,
-0.03874760493636131,
-0.02523144520819187,
0.01866583153605461,
-0.05962459370493889,
0.04368541017174721,
-0.0912647396326065,
-0.04406113177537918,
-0.04317713901400566,
0.05294857919216156,
0.03923317417502403,
-0.07633130252361298,
-0.052236348390579224,
0.02816910669207573,
-0.028340782970190048,
0.02621031366288662,
0.00026987859746441245,
0.10408063977956772,
-0.004026365932077169,
0.04465709254145622,
0.03506104648113251,
0.017384665086865425,
0.019824456423521042,
-0.037319526076316833,
-0.055155131965875626,
0.010203885845839977,
-0.02290339022874832,
0.01722353883087635,
0.011558066122233868,
-0.011808620765805244,
-0.04027872160077095,
0.0563495047390461,
-0.006913876160979271,
0.04973842576146126,
-0.06838154792785645,
0.034600630402565,
0.022612495347857475,
0.028419217094779015,
-0.020640280097723007,
0.0015294051263481379,
0.04197685793042183,
0.012529348023235798,
-0.05908595398068428,
-0.07695294916629791,
0.011305827647447586,
3.4644882150884643e-33,
0.004310014192014933,
-0.017357073724269867,
-0.06346986442804337,
0.0373685322701931,
0.06993931531906128,
0.023598628118634224,
-0.005692904815077782,
-0.05334707722067833,
0.028373466804623604,
-0.008302222937345505,
-0.04564682021737099,
0.10643822699785233,
0.07375628501176834,
0.07481268048286438,
-0.03059481643140316,
-0.012877135537564754,
-0.07599867880344391,
-0.04654993116855621,
-0.07915251702070236,
-0.08119543641805649,
0.02261246182024479,
-0.05324315279722214,
0.02112811803817749,
0.0640154778957367,
-0.019597208127379417,
-0.035181667655706406,
-0.031047223135828972,
0.035355232656002045,
0.0310610830783844,
-0.0008407263085246086,
-0.06063343957066536,
0.0028012620750814676,
0.04311927407979965,
-0.004618179053068161,
0.0380035899579525,
0.016369780525565147,
0.02687879092991352,
-0.043860871344804764,
0.007590688299387693,
-0.05533210188150406,
-0.07889658212661743,
0.0228385329246521,
-0.03335950896143913,
0.03719908371567726,
-0.046355072408914566,
0.04117513447999954,
0.03982468694448471,
0.03781130164861679,
0.08366674184799194,
-0.007194207049906254,
0.04832938686013222,
0.046120237559080124,
0.023557035252451897,
-0.021243911236524582,
-0.10456828027963638,
-0.09460217505693436,
-0.003307210747152567,
0.0005306657403707504,
0.07682744413614273,
-0.02955077402293682,
0.003656792687252164,
0.008270054124295712,
-0.04878990352153778,
0.04873788356781006,
-0.043920088559389114,
-0.01886538229882717,
-0.07645639032125473,
0.03736426308751106,
0.029274791479110718,
-0.04974823817610741,
0.1578477919101715,
-0.07383716851472855,
-0.0823933333158493,
-0.04424462839961052,
-0.015441402792930603,
0.08635510504245758,
0.12119682878255844,
0.03580329567193985,
0.09712201356887817,
-0.0264626145362854,
-0.006159327458590269,
-0.032026611268520355,
0.06426744163036346,
0.0107526620849967,
0.04073360189795494,
0.006582196336239576,
-0.0004356193239800632,
0.01467900164425373,
0.01637323759496212,
-0.02561958134174347,
0.04142271727323532,
0.06475207954645157,
0.009193281643092632,
-0.0030372398905456066,
-0.07243720442056656,
-5.4094538211193286e-33,
-0.005927034188061953,
0.057073626667261124,
0.010098022408783436,
-0.014911531470716,
0.04486122354865074,
-0.01724276691675186,
-0.0222540982067585,
-0.03879181668162346,
0.040647149085998535,
-0.07783038169145584,
0.021790623664855957,
0.05798855051398277,
0.11109166592359543,
0.045764606446027756,
-0.027294069528579712,
-0.06614470481872559,
0.06255941092967987,
0.05302370339632034,
0.08142007887363434,
0.006435081362724304,
-0.06528062373399734,
0.11672896146774292,
-0.11416174471378326,
-0.051541123539209366,
-0.048768699169158936,
-0.04943731054663658,
-0.022721294313669205,
0.02861795760691166,
-0.0252386387437582,
0.0062679871916770935,
-0.06701015681028366,
0.012620245106518269,
-0.09163540601730347,
0.04809275642037392,
0.07716379314661026,
0.0610039196908474,
0.06812677532434464,
0.0008712947019375861,
-0.01361971627920866,
0.0005561044090427458,
0.068796306848526,
-0.02326885424554348,
0.034699697047472,
0.013128405436873436,
0.026493990793824196,
0.02233567088842392,
-0.10716813057661057,
-0.01805211417376995,
-0.08270349353551865,
0.05563231185078621,
-0.13774849474430084,
0.015855325385928154,
-0.03638904169201851,
0.04726173356175423,
-0.03639791160821915,
0.04390646889805794,
-0.02292785234749317,
0.010945887304842472,
0.11899050325155258,
0.01272557768970728,
-0.0726023018360138,
-0.0061094434931874275,
-0.042821288108825684,
-0.11100859940052032,
-0.0026726480573415756,
-0.04096067324280739,
-0.02910803072154522,
0.013515192084014416,
-0.06728873401880264,
0.026950448751449585,
-0.008026284165680408,
-0.12961646914482117,
-0.04466859623789787,
-0.07033183425664902,
-0.0469416081905365,
0.03128521144390106,
0.008312216959893703,
0.005622573662549257,
-0.020292382687330246,
-0.021150633692741394,
-0.0316622368991375,
-0.016604747623205185,
-0.04625017195940018,
-0.06393364071846008,
0.001782125560566783,
0.04143983870744705,
0.01733531802892685,
-0.04670991003513336,
-0.018231768161058426,
0.1356496512889862,
-0.009418729692697525,
-0.036262739449739456,
0.05047272890806198,
0.026636408641934395,
-0.06341578811407089,
-5.570603889282211e-8,
0.042287155985832214,
0.07391948252916336,
-0.020295295864343643,
0.009245461784303188,
0.060021884739398956,
0.014283034950494766,
-0.07026723027229309,
-0.07828636467456818,
0.001730834599584341,
-0.0348685160279274,
0.05518634617328644,
-0.05863463506102562,
-0.076698437333107,
-0.060750409960746765,
-0.07261699438095093,
0.08356636762619019,
-0.051405489444732666,
-0.029997218400239944,
-0.05491256341338158,
-0.055979616940021515,
-0.07807821035385132,
0.060700491070747375,
0.0285528264939785,
0.026938987895846367,
0.04414746165275574,
-0.020952090620994568,
-0.04384097456932068,
0.06178480014204979,
-0.0006883509922772646,
-0.04862091690301895,
-0.06546128541231155,
0.06870883703231812,
-0.0655556470155716,
-0.06314551830291748,
0.02961011976003647,
-0.027854720130562782,
-0.10749971121549606,
-0.011255850084125996,
0.07997036725282669,
-0.022742953151464462,
-0.024629438295960426,
-0.005558623466640711,
0.0067723593674600124,
0.000101025405456312,
-0.0028231639880687,
0.012787610292434692,
-0.04268945753574371,
0.061475206166505814,
0.02262737601995468,
-0.06641754508018494,
-0.10055774450302124,
-0.06608449667692184,
-0.06098345294594765,
0.0192699171602726,
0.06863714754581451,
-0.06986319273710251,
0.0038484244141727686,
0.009916678071022034,
0.09238342940807343,
-0.013271819800138474,
-0.02842807024717331,
0.04186750203371048,
-0.09276985377073288,
-0.03727182373404503
] | {
"pdf_file": "TW5273JZ43VOQUCL7FRZ2N6STHYBBCQ4.pdf",
"text": "COOPER ANNOUNCES PRESIDENTIAL INAUGURATION TICKET DISTRIBUTION\nPLANS\n\r\n Tuesday, December 16\r\n\r\n\r\nObama volunteers, African-American leaders, community members to get tickets\n\r\n\r\nNASHVILLE—Congressman Jim Cooper today announced plans to distribute tickets to the 2009 Presidential\nInauguration to local Obama campaign volunteers, community leaders and dozens of other Middle Tennessee residents.\nCooper will award about three dozen tickets by random drawing, while the rest will be distributed to community members\nand volunteers who have already made contact with his office.\n\r\n\r\nCooper said he was especially focused on ensuring that African-Americans got to participate in the inaugural ceremony\ndue to record interest in the swearing-in of America’s first black president. Cooper received over 6,000 requests\nfor 198 tickets.\n\r\n\r\n“Clearly, Nashvillians of all ages, races, religions and backgrounds are excited about the inauguration of Barack\nObama,” said Cooper, a longtime Obama supporter. “I wish I had enough tickets for everyone who wanted\none, but I’ve tried to be as fair as possible with the few I was given. This will be a historic occasion for our\ncountry.”\n\r\n\r\nOnly those who contacted Cooper’s office by last month’s cutoff date will be eligible to participate in the\ndrawing. They have been contacted by mail or email and must respond by Thursday, December 18, to confirm their\ninterest in tickets.\n\r\n\r\nCooper and his staff are staying in touch with everyone who contacted the office about inaugural tickets in an effort to let\nthem know about free public events in Washington during the January 18-21 Inaugural festivities, which coincide with the\nMartin Luther King, Jr. holiday. The National Mall will be open to the public for the occasion.\n\r\n\r\n“No matter where you celebrate the occasion, all Americans have a reason to be proud on January 20,”\nsaid Cooper. “We face many huge challenges, but never before have I seen the country so ready for shared\nsacrifice and so optimistic about the next chapter in our history.”\n\r\n\r\nMore information about the inaugural can be found at the official inaugural web sites: http://pic2009.org and\nhttp://inaugural.senate.gov/. \n\r\n\r\n\r\n###\n\r\n\rCongressman Jim Cooper\nhttp://www.cooper.house.gov Powered by Joomla! Generated: 18 March, 2010, 18:21 \r\n \r\n\r\nCongressman Jim Cooper\nhttp://www.cooper.house.gov Powered by Joomla! Generated: 18 March, 2010, 18:21"
} |
[
-0.15154556930065155,
0.01866842992603779,
-0.06081134453415871,
-0.024835284799337387,
0.05190790444612503,
-0.055380191653966904,
0.008785214275121689,
0.0800851434469223,
0.010372714139521122,
-0.028557023033499718,
0.06253014504909515,
-0.04469115659594536,
0.04569903761148453,
0.015175183303654194,
-0.0486958883702755,
-0.02966349758207798,
0.012445303611457348,
-0.07955347746610641,
-0.054282572120428085,
0.04787873476743698,
0.047772739082574844,
0.03301607072353363,
-0.0908920094370842,
0.00838682521134615,
0.0006629591807723045,
0.026161184534430504,
-0.00576080521568656,
0.010178055614233017,
-0.013115709647536278,
-0.12137465924024582,
0.06527909636497498,
0.1019572764635086,
0.0644690990447998,
0.013259178027510643,
0.058013916015625,
0.024785758927464485,
-0.03607645258307457,
-0.030451219528913498,
0.020059967413544655,
0.01956922933459282,
0.005677367560565472,
-0.015563569962978363,
0.022935334593057632,
0.06217247247695923,
-0.01459047943353653,
-0.021986162289977074,
-0.04677518829703331,
-0.01013726182281971,
-0.09984657913446426,
-0.052739065140485764,
0.06140797212719917,
0.056005943566560745,
-0.03683244064450264,
0.10729525238275528,
0.05515562742948532,
-0.11892984062433243,
-0.10704320669174194,
-0.06190875172615051,
0.03856414183974266,
0.004448348190635443,
0.0320877768099308,
0.01999005302786827,
-0.028491653501987457,
0.001396994455717504,
-0.02419677935540676,
0.03376475349068642,
-0.023522458970546722,
-0.05822811648249626,
0.013217341154813766,
-0.02022784762084484,
-0.11607814580202103,
-0.03686962276697159,
-0.041869498789310455,
0.10875668376684189,
0.03135885298252106,
0.09153210371732712,
0.11359592527151108,
-0.02197469212114811,
0.04358762875199318,
-0.15545357763767242,
-0.005677858367562294,
0.02587435208261013,
0.06097490340471268,
-0.03979033604264259,
0.04397067055106163,
0.017932018265128136,
0.02144760824739933,
0.04171996936202049,
0.021887226030230522,
0.022194912657141685,
0.09279046207666397,
-0.008442506194114685,
-0.016858074814081192,
0.07428782433271408,
0.02179734967648983,
0.006810349877923727,
0.05119014158844948,
0.013461364433169365,
0.0038232477381825447,
0.10149494558572769,
0.048710037022829056,
0.028036830946803093,
-0.02570633962750435,
0.001157583319582045,
-0.13864004611968994,
-0.09400611370801926,
0.04505851864814758,
0.08405943214893341,
-0.010778681375086308,
-0.04131658375263214,
-0.049992647022008896,
0.03609650954604149,
-0.05058302357792854,
-0.051519062370061874,
-0.05255543813109398,
0.020418675616383553,
-0.008175987750291824,
0.01968083158135414,
0.004624847788363695,
-0.021342499181628227,
-0.003782456973567605,
0.02650230936706066,
-0.011669592931866646,
0.029946723952889442,
-0.0634322315454483,
-0.031917769461870193,
-0.030070608481764793,
1.0772426391555236e-32,
-0.005915313959121704,
0.024800637736916542,
-0.07695398479700089,
-0.034350283443927765,
0.01936441846191883,
-0.016658322885632515,
-0.03456168994307518,
0.028170552104711533,
-0.014524192549288273,
-0.019493501633405685,
-0.05950954556465149,
0.018967216834425926,
-0.009689044207334518,
-0.016364039853215218,
0.05016662925481796,
-0.033051472157239914,
-0.027917474508285522,
0.04843517392873764,
-0.01167760044336319,
-0.002932390896603465,
0.028009263798594475,
0.006074379198253155,
0.0015848581679165363,
-0.05477091670036316,
-0.017518414184451103,
0.049694765359163284,
0.044225044548511505,
-0.0557209774851799,
0.021728213876485825,
0.03600648045539856,
0.015408092178404331,
0.0019228400196880102,
-0.007001260761171579,
0.0005501300329342484,
-0.0173229668289423,
0.005570863373577595,
-0.08134624361991882,
-0.05807797238230705,
-0.00917903520166874,
-0.03988723084330559,
0.05960000678896904,
0.1070541962981224,
-0.034911155700683594,
0.04489973932504654,
0.0818905308842659,
-0.04920681193470955,
-0.045415833592414856,
-0.02662494033575058,
0.07741720974445343,
-0.0000205062169698067,
-0.015657486394047737,
0.07959293574094772,
-0.0029616598039865494,
-0.05282020941376686,
0.008609638549387455,
0.015826383605599403,
0.040228117257356644,
0.0009338957606814802,
0.04667598009109497,
0.00013369793305173516,
0.007451591547578573,
0.08836562186479568,
-0.05064931511878967,
-0.08049564808607101,
-0.043301910161972046,
0.021817926317453384,
-0.02301071770489216,
0.0049054259434342384,
-0.10213575512170792,
0.025116002187132835,
-0.014536590315401554,
-0.05632742494344711,
0.10548309981822968,
-0.014551986008882523,
0.058046963065862656,
-0.006698077078908682,
0.06638434529304504,
0.02190360799431801,
0.03249259293079376,
-0.023616844788193703,
-0.10096121579408646,
0.011064634658396244,
-0.021387692540884018,
-0.016489490866661072,
-0.03990406543016434,
-0.056992970407009125,
-0.05191037431359291,
0.02353399619460106,
-0.0504378080368042,
0.018967632204294205,
0.06215224042534828,
-0.03085216134786606,
-0.04033394902944565,
-0.004276448395103216,
-0.019124291837215424,
-8.67934261984901e-33,
-0.007176714949309826,
0.04243064671754837,
-0.026168325915932655,
-0.02238704077899456,
0.0008349319687113166,
-0.024832341820001602,
0.015527211129665375,
-0.0026570288464426994,
0.060667213052511215,
0.011613469570875168,
0.10377110540866852,
0.05975764989852905,
0.027341876178979874,
-0.022891905158758163,
0.07890605181455612,
-0.018755782395601273,
-0.029327362775802612,
0.018016304820775986,
-0.02530403435230255,
0.017818791791796684,
0.05404171720147133,
0.14680878818035126,
-0.010560363531112671,
-0.008937183767557144,
0.045868825167417526,
0.09001294523477554,
0.031898871064186096,
0.0667840912938118,
0.058709580451250076,
0.0014759626938030124,
-0.018424224108457565,
0.005148150492459536,
-0.08426344394683838,
0.08530355989933014,
-0.06913463771343231,
-0.04513454809784889,
0.0220615416765213,
0.05196459963917732,
-0.08734162151813507,
0.004835509229451418,
0.012167896144092083,
0.06512654572725296,
-0.06512647867202759,
0.027273181825876236,
-0.011666701175272465,
0.032394424080848694,
0.07431408017873764,
0.025890683755278587,
0.11311697959899902,
-0.017320524901151657,
0.015469475649297237,
0.043225184082984924,
0.03854207694530487,
0.08609358221292496,
0.0035632860381156206,
0.009598501957952976,
-0.0031171056907624006,
0.04310419410467148,
-0.028347710147500038,
-0.05127839371562004,
0.04998781159520149,
0.055267877876758575,
0.04095989838242531,
-0.09152750670909882,
0.020666319876909256,
-0.020061401650309563,
-0.0564451701939106,
0.07478120177984238,
-0.022239483892917633,
-0.04653172567486763,
0.0761726126074791,
-0.07609841972589493,
-0.06913508474826813,
-0.0869971215724945,
0.04855324327945709,
-0.003279007039964199,
-0.00036320232902653515,
-0.06181645393371582,
-0.034078504890203476,
-0.08300578594207764,
-0.05248596891760826,
0.032303474843502045,
0.022555571049451828,
0.09215115010738373,
0.04034411162137985,
-0.039770834147930145,
-0.0002143368765246123,
-0.03781706094741821,
0.0895964726805687,
0.02162528969347477,
-0.03291458263993263,
0.025977283716201782,
0.06950642168521881,
0.11203750967979431,
0.030134370550513268,
-6.688076581440328e-8,
-0.06516473740339279,
-0.028619809076189995,
-0.021861372515559196,
-0.023991473019123077,
0.056946270167827606,
-0.031307052820920944,
-0.05066973716020584,
0.014301963150501251,
0.02154288999736309,
-0.027330132201313972,
0.06668701022863388,
-0.017125509679317474,
-0.06501585245132446,
-0.050680823624134064,
0.04655265435576439,
0.00389785785228014,
-0.0679287537932396,
-0.007856562733650208,
-0.029173938557505608,
-0.0163780115544796,
-0.05268188193440437,
-0.005347679369151592,
0.10777024179697037,
-0.07281944155693054,
-0.07292653620243073,
-0.004003226291388273,
0.07551196962594986,
0.025727244094014168,
0.0037049937527626753,
-0.002063567051663995,
-0.028495194390416145,
0.006988223176449537,
0.025331703945994377,
-0.03877200558781624,
0.06856885552406311,
0.052554212510585785,
-0.08868981152772903,
0.007475001737475395,
0.016188807785511017,
0.0533161424100399,
0.006483240518718958,
-0.04831454157829285,
0.03407781198620796,
0.10647118836641312,
0.05043093487620354,
0.030520493164658546,
-0.06606604158878326,
-0.022470101714134216,
0.04987766593694687,
-0.09021544456481934,
0.0053661298006772995,
-0.08423414826393127,
-0.02930389903485775,
-0.0427766852080822,
-0.10532357543706894,
0.041363947093486786,
-0.07934707403182983,
-0.05701833590865135,
0.10432734340429306,
-0.023216059431433678,
0.0578291229903698,
-0.04948192089796066,
0.029950596392154694,
0.014812990091741085
] | {
"pdf_file": "4WDM523HPSRSKBCVFVEJGLJ43DYOQRKO.pdf",
"text": "UNCLASSIFIED \tE142 \nORIGIN WHA-00 \nINFO LOG-00 NP-00 \tAMAD-00 A-00 \tCA-00 \tCIP-00 COME-00 \nDODE-00 DOTE-00 EAP-00 EB-00 \tEUR-00 FAAE-00 UTED-00 \nFCC-01 VC-00 H-00 TEDE-00 INR-00 I0-00 VCE-00 \nNSAE-00 NSCE-00 OIC-00 OIG-00 OMB-00 CAEX-00 PA-00 \nGIW1-00 IRM-00 SSO-00 SS-00 TEST-00 TRSE-00 BBG-00 \nR-00 \tECA-00 DRL-00 SAS-00 \t/001R \nRELEASED IN PART \n182507 B5 SOURCE: CBLEXCLS.007052 \nDRAFTED BY: WHA/PDA:LSHAMILTON -- 08/24/2004 647-4726 \nAPPROVED BY: WHA/PDA:GRGALLEGOS \nPA: AERELI (SUBS) \nDESIRED DISTRIBUTION: \nDRL/BA-DMTITUS, H-MTREJO, NSC-FARMSTRONG \n\t 552E61 250009Z /38 \nP R 250003Z AUG 04 \nFM SECSTATE WASHDC \nTO WESTERN HEMISPHERIC AFFAIRS DIPL POSTS PRIORITY \nAMEMBASSY COPENHAGEN PRIORITY \nAMEMBASSY DUBLIN PRIORITY \nAMEMBASSY LISBON PRIORITY \nAMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY \nAMEMBASSY MADRID PRIORITY \nAMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY \nAMEMBASSY PORT AU PRINCE PRIORITY \nAMEMBASSY ROME PRIORITY \nAMEMBASSY THE HAGUE PRIORITY \nAMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY \nAMCONSUL RIO DE JANEIRO PRIORITY \nUSMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY \nINFO AMCONSUL CIUDAD JUAREZ \nAMCONSUL NUEVO LAREDO \nAMCONSUL SAO PAULO \nAMCONSUL TIJUANA \nUSMISSION USUN NEW YORK \nUSCINCTRANS INTEL CEN SCOTT AFB IL \nUSCINCLANTFLT NORFOLK VA \nUSCINCSO MIAMI FL \nUSCINCSO MACDILL AFB FL//POLAD \nUNCLAS STATE 182507 \nALL POSTS FOR PAO, USSOCOM FOR POLAD \nE.O. 12958: N/A \nTAGS: OPRC, KPAO \nSUBJECT: WHA GUIDANCE, AUGUST 23-24, 2004 \nUNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE \nREVIEW AUTHORITY: NORMAN M BOUTON \nDATE/CASE ID: 25 OCT 2005 200304736 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED \nSummary of Contents: \n1.WHA Press Guidance, Aug 23 (Veneuzela) \n2.WHA Press Guidance, Aug 24 (Cuba) \nEnd Summary. \n1. WHA PRESS GUIDANCE, AUGUST 23, 2004: \n-- VENEZUELA: FINAL COMMENT ON REFERENDUM RESULTS -- \nQ: WHAT IS THE U.S. REACTION TO THE INTERNATIONAL \nOBSERVERS, ANNOUNCEMENT THAT THEIR PARTIAL AUDIT CONFIRMED \nPRESIDENT CHAVEZ, VICTORY IN THE REFERENDUM? \nA: THE RESULTS OF THE OAS AND CARTER CENTER AUDIT ARE \nCONSISTENT WITH THE RESULTS ANNOUNCED BY THE NATIONAL \nELECTORAL COUNCIL ON AUGUST 16. WE UNDERSTAND THE ELECTORAL \nCOUNCIL WILL CERTIFY THE FINAL RESULTS ON AUGUST 25. \nWE URGE THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY, LED BY THE OAS AND THE \nFRIENDS OF THE OAS SECRETARY GENERAL FOR VENEZUELA AND THE \nCARTER CENTER, TO CONTINUE TO SUPPORT THE VENEZUELAN \nPEOPLE,S DEMOCRATIC EFFORTS. \nQ: DOES THIS MEAN THE U.S. NOW ACCEPTS CHAVEZ, VICTORY IN \nTHE REFERENDUM? \nA: WE RECOGNIZE THE INTERNATIONAL OBSERVERS, FINDINGS ARE \nCONSISTANT WITH THE RESULTS OF THE NATIONAL ELECTORAL COUNCIL. \nTHE RESULTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES. \nQ: WHAT ABOUT CONTINUED OPPOSITION ALLEGATIONS OF FRAUD? \nREFUSAL TO ACCEPT THE RESULTS? \nA: WE NOTE THE CONCERNS RAISED BY THE OPPOSITION. \nWE URGE THE DEMOCRATIC OPPOSITION TO HEED SECRETARY GENERAL \nGAVIRIA,S OFFER TO PRESENT ANY EVIDENCE OF POSSIBLE FRAUD TO \nTHE OAS. \nTHROUGHOUT THIS PROCESS, WE HAVE EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT \nINTIMIDATION OF CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS SUCH AS THE SUMATE (PRON. \nSU-MA-TAY), THE POLITIZATION OF STATE INSTITUTIONS AND THE \nUSE OF THE JUDICIARY FOR POLITICAL MEANS. \nWE REMAIN CONCERNED THAT DOUBTS ABOUT THE PROCESS MAY \nEXACERBATE POLARIZATION IN VENEZUELA. \nUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED \nWE URGE BOTH THE VENEZUELAN GOVERNMENT AND THE DEMOCRATIC \nOPPOSITION TO WORK TOWARD REDUCING THESE TENSIONS AND TO \nENGAGE IN A CONSTRUCTIVE DEMOCRATIC DIALOGUE. \nTHE VENEZUELAN GOVERNMENT HAS THE SPECIAL RESPONSIBILITY OF \nGUARANTEEING THE RIGHTS OF ALL CITIZENS. THE OPPOSITION HAS \nTHE DUTY TO EXPRESS ITS CONCERNS RESPONSIBLY AND PEACEFULLY. \nIF ASKED: \nQ: REACTION TO PRESIDENT CHAVEZ, COMMENTS OVER THE WEEKEND \nTHAT HE REFUSED TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE OPPOSITION? \nA: WE BELIEVE SUCH COMMENTS ARE NOT CONDUCIVE TO NATIONAL \nPEACE AND DEMOCRATIC ENGAGEMENT. WE CALL ON ALL PARTIES TO \nREFRAIN FROM IRRESPONSIBLE RHETORIC AND ACTIONS, WHICH ONLY \nSERVE TO DEEPEN THE POLARIZATION. \n2. WHA PRESS GUIDANCE, AUGUST 24, 2004: \n-- CUBA ) COMMISSION FOR ASSISTANCE TO A FREE CUBA: \nWASHINGTON POST ARTICLE ON AUGUST 24, 2004 -- \nQ. HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THE CHARGE THAT OUR CUBA POLICY IS \nPOLITICALLY MOTIVATED? \nA: OUR POLICY TOWARD CUBA IS TO ENCOURAGE A RAPID, PEACEFUL \nTRANSITION TO DEMOCRACY. TO HELP THE CUBAN PEOPLE ACHIEVE \nTHIS GOAL, THE PRESIDENT CREATED THE COMMISSION FOR \nASSISTANCE TO A FREE CUBA WITH A MANDATE TO HELP BRING AN END \nTO THE DICTATORSHIP, AND TO LAY OUT A PLAN FOR ASSISTANCE TO \nA FREE CUBA. \nTHE COMMISSION RECOMMENDED AN INTEGRATED, STRATEGIC APPROACH \nTO SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN CUBA AND LIMIT \nTHE REGIMES MANIPULATION OF HUMANITARIAN POLICIES TO \nACCUMULATE RESOURCES TO FINANCE REPRESSION. THE \nCOMMISSION,S RECOMMENDATIONS ARE BEING IMPLEMENTED. \nQ. HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO CHARGES THAT THE POLICY IS TOO \nHARSH AND HAS ALIENATED CUBAN-AMERICANS? \nA: THE CHANGES IN LICENSING RULES ARE DESIGNED TO LIMIT THE \nFLOW OF U.S. DOLLARS TO THE CASTRO REGIME AND ARE NOT \nDIRECTED SOLELY AT CUBAN-AMERICANS. \nTHE COMMISSION RECOMMENDED CHANGES THAT INCLUDED TIGHTENING \nUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED OF RESTRICTIONS ON EDUCATIONAL AND PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES IN \nCUBA, AS WELL AS LIMITING FAMILY TRAVEL. THE COMMISSION ALSO \nWELCOMED COMMENTS FROM INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANIZATIONS, \nREVIEWED HUNDREDS OF E-MAILS AND LETTERS, AND MET WITH A \nDIVERSE GROUP OF EXPERTS, WHOSE OPINIONS SPANNED A RANGE OF \nVIEWS FROM THE CUBAN-AMERICAN COMMUNITY. \nQ. WHAT RULES ARE CURRENTLY IN PLACE REGARDING FOOD, \nMEDICINE AND TOILETRIES TO CUBA? \nA: THE COMMISSION DETERMINED THAT THE CUBAN GOVERNMENT \nEARNED TENS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS ANNUALLY BY CHARGING \nDELIVERY FEES TO RECIPIENTS OF GIFT PARCELS. RECOGNIZING \nTHAT GIFT PARCELS MEET A FUNDAMENTAL HUMANITARIAN NEED IN \nCUBA, THE COMMISSION RECOMMENDED THAT GIFT PARCELS BE LIMITED \nTO FOOD, MEDICINES, MEDICAL SUPPLIES AND DEVICES, RADIOS AND \nBATTERIES. THIS RECOMMENDATION HAS BEEN IMPLEMENTED. \nFOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON GIFT PARCELS, I SUGGEST THAT \nYOU CONTACT THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE. \nQ. IS THERE A REVIEW OF IMPLEMENTATION UNDERWAY? \nA: THE NEW TREASURY DEPARTMENT REGULATIONS WERE OPEN FOR \nPUBLIC COMMENT THROUGH AUGUST 15. WE UNDERSTAND THAT THE \nTREASURY DEPARTMENT RECEIVED MANY COMMENTS AND WILL BE \nREVIEWING THEM IN THE COMING MONTHS. \nWE CONTINUE TO REVIEW OUR POLICIES TO ENSURE THAT WE FULFILL \nTHE RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE COMMISSION,S REPORT TO THE \nPRESIDENT. \n-- CUBA: AIRBORNE BROADCASTS OF RADIO AND TV MARTI TO CUBA --\n(REVISED) \nQ: COULD YOU GIVE US SOME BACKGROUND ON THE RECENT AIRBORNE \nBROADCASTS TO CUBA? \nA: THE COMMISSION FOR ASSISTANCE TO A FREE CUBA RECOMMENDED \nTO THE PRESIDENT THAT AIRBORNE TRANSMISSIONS OF RADIO AND TV \nMARTI BROADCASTING BE CARRIED OUT ON A REGULAR BASIS TO BREAK \nTHE CUBAN REGIME'S INFORMATION BLOCKADE ON THE CUBAN PEOPLE. \nTHAT TASK, PART OF AN INTEGRATED APPROACH TO ASSIST THE CUBAN \nPEOPLE IN THEIR EFFORTS TO BRING ABOUT RAPID AND PEACEFUL \nCHANGE TO CUBA, WAS BEGUN ON SATURDAY, AUGUST 21. FOR \nSEVERAL HOURS, A PENNSYLVANIA AIR NATIONAL GUARD AIRCRAFT \nOPERATING WITHIN U.S. AIRSPACE BROADCAST A RADIO AND TV MARTI \nSIGNAL CAPABLE OF BEING RECEIVED IN CUBA. \nUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED \nBUILDING ON THE EFFORTS OF CUBAN CIVIL SOCIETY, THESE TYPES \nOF BROADCASTS WILL INCREASE THE AVAILABILITY TO THE CUBAN \nPEOPLE OF RELIABLE INFORMATION ON EVENTS IN CUBA AND AROUND \nTHE WORLD. \nQ: DID THE BROADCAST INTERFERE WITH PRIVATE U.S. \nBROADCASTING? \nA: THE AIRBORNE BROADCAST OF TV MARTI WAS UNDERTAKEN ON A \nFREQUENCY ALREADY AUTHORIZED BY THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS \nCOMMISSION FOR TV MARTI BROADCASTS. \nWE UNDERSTAND THAT RADIO MARTI WAS BROADCAST ON A FREQUENCY \nNOT USED BY U.S. COMMERCIAL BROADCASTERS. \nTHE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION IS TAKING STEPS TO \nMINIMIZE POTENTIAL TV MARTI INTERFERENCE WITH DOMESTIC \nSTATIONS BY EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF THE BROADCASTS ON \nDOMESTIC LICENSEES. \nQ: IS THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CONCERNED ABOUT POSSIBLE \nHOSTILE ACTION AGAINST U.S. PERSONNEL IN RESPONSE TO THE \nBROADCASTS? WHAT WOULD THE RESPONSE TO SUCH AN ACT BE? \nA: FOR THE SAFETY OF OUR PEOPLE AND OPERATIONAL SECURITY, WE \nDO NOT DISCUSS OPERATIONAL MATTERS IN DETAIL. HOWEVER, \nPRECAUTIONS HAVE BEEN TAKEN TO MINIMIZE THE THREATS TO U.S. \nPERSONNEL FROM CUBAN FIGHTER AIRCRAFT INTERCEPTS OR OTHER \nDIRECT THREATS AGAINST THE AIRCRAFT. \nTHESE BROADCASTS WERE MADE ONLY IN U.S. AIRSPACE. ANY \nATTEMPT TO INTERCEPT THE AIRCRAFT WOULD BE TREATED AS A \nHOSTILE ACT AND APPROPRIATE SELF-DEFENSE MEASURES WOULD BE \nTAKEN. \nQ: CASTRO HAS LONG CLAIMED THAT THE U.S. INTENDS TO TAKE \nMILITARY ACTION AGAINST CUBA. IS THIS THE FIRST STEP IN THAT \nPROCESS? \nA: THE POLICY OF THE UNITED STATES IS TO HASTEN A PEACEFUL \nTRANSITION TO DEMOCRACY IN CUBA. THAT POLICY HAS BEEN \nARTICULATED AT THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF OUR GOVERNMENT, \nINCLUDING BY SECRETARY POWELL. \nTV MARTI HAS TRANSMITTED ITS SIGNAL TO CUBA FOR OVER A \nDECADE, AND ITS SIGNAL IS ROUTINELY JAMMED BY THE REGIME. \nOUR HOPE IS THAT THESE BROADCASTS WILL ENABLE THE CUBAN \nPEOPLE TO HAVE ACCESS TO UNCENSORED INFORMATION ABOUT CUBA \nAND THE WORLD. \nUNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED \nQ: HAVE YOU RECEIVED ANY PROTESTS FROM THE CUBAN GOVERNMENT \nCONCERNING THESE BROADCASTS? \nA: THE CUBAN GOVERNMENT HAS COMPLAINED ABOUT RADIO AND TV \nMARTI BROADCASTS SINCE THEIR INCEPTION. WE HAVE NO DOUBT \nTHAT THE REGIME WILL CONTINUE TO COMPLAIN ABOUT OUR EFFORTS \nTO PROVIDE DETAILED AND ACCURATE INFORMATION TO THE CUBAN \nPEOPLE ABOUT EVENTS OUTSIDE OF CUBA. \nIT IS OUR POSITION THAT THE MORE CUBANS KNOW ABOUT THE WORLD \n-- AND THE WORLD KNOWS THE TRUTH ABOUT CUBA -- THE BETTER THE \nCHANCES OF A RAPID AND PEACEFUL TRANSITION TO DEMOCRACY, \nWHICH IS THE CENTRAL GOAL OF THE UNITED STATES AND ITS ALLIES \nIN EUROPE AND LATIN AMERICA. \nONLY IF ASKED: \nB5 \nPOWELL \nNNNN \nUNCLASSIFIED "
} |
[
-0.11883839964866638,
0.04829868674278259,
-0.0025480559561401606,
-0.011011209338903427,
0.05195074528455734,
0.010291832499206066,
0.1154332384467125,
0.0007007909007370472,
-0.08592535555362701,
-0.07065396010875702,
0.0013317164266481996,
-0.035472381860017776,
0.018434155732393265,
-0.006737178191542625,
0.024402987211942673,
-0.029503243044018745,
-0.058138374239206314,
-0.05043954402208328,
-0.020765526220202446,
0.029036032035946846,
-0.06367600709199905,
0.024029914289712906,
0.0262432973831892,
-0.006037362851202488,
-0.011076544411480427,
-0.0014006864512339234,
-0.018619801849126816,
0.03277004510164261,
0.0028860096354037523,
-0.05694391578435898,
-0.04394163936376572,
0.025414075702428818,
0.08790954202413559,
-0.02499123103916645,
-0.03668315336108208,
0.0062413448467850685,
-0.06646791845560074,
-0.0671444833278656,
0.020564241334795952,
0.04238877445459366,
0.021880215033888817,
-0.04288247600197792,
-0.03437700495123863,
0.06146686151623726,
0.0656372681260109,
-0.0785202905535698,
0.029487011954188347,
0.010798297822475433,
0.06332410126924515,
-0.04508465901017189,
-0.01823394186794758,
-0.027721041813492775,
-0.0036737609189003706,
-0.03659451752901077,
0.054250262677669525,
-0.02085655927658081,
0.015034922398626804,
-0.060095224529504776,
0.016393909230828285,
-0.03323858231306076,
0.01750349812209606,
-0.0005952207720838487,
-0.16348379850387573,
0.08492093533277512,
-0.07583844661712646,
0.0161097701638937,
0.048382941633462906,
-0.007598146330565214,
-0.024985475465655327,
0.05949747934937477,
0.0658901110291481,
-0.03513742983341217,
0.0008843158720992506,
-0.11567969620227814,
0.049390342086553574,
0.03360460326075554,
0.055154237896203995,
0.026383694261312485,
0.053694359958171844,
0.038932498544454575,
0.0004393816343508661,
0.0180604699999094,
-0.09288253635168076,
-0.004073987249284983,
-0.0008234609267674387,
-0.04883106052875519,
-0.006677441764622927,
-0.023541681468486786,
-0.03813307359814644,
0.05245159938931465,
-0.042493823915719986,
-0.055899728089571,
0.08681583404541016,
-0.04896170645952225,
-0.08339672535657883,
-0.0457635223865509,
0.029042238369584084,
0.03465776517987251,
-0.08649188280105591,
0.4062184691429138,
0.03594949096441269,
0.018697189167141914,
0.0979783833026886,
-0.007865204475820065,
0.023714108392596245,
-0.05756505951285362,
-0.06109985336661339,
-0.006620500702410936,
0.007060033269226551,
0.021669859066605568,
-0.024405108764767647,
-0.033514637500047684,
0.00025015627034008503,
0.03170765936374664,
0.04407161846756935,
0.09463243186473846,
-0.035580113530159,
-0.0045343064703047276,
0.043714847415685654,
0.00020504710846580565,
-0.002858717693015933,
-0.024884076789021492,
0.0037606365513056517,
0.014041258953511715,
0.07781578600406647,
-0.1323145031929016,
0.0068764761090278625,
-7.2201250750405e-33,
0.007334581576287746,
0.002726183971390128,
0.012147537432610989,
-0.002440247917547822,
0.027932560071349144,
0.03927065059542656,
0.003743888111785054,
-0.04643532633781433,
-0.014492551796138287,
0.05360198765993118,
0.006590632256120443,
0.03664784133434296,
-0.023135676980018616,
0.03275369852781296,
0.07811082899570465,
0.009627518244087696,
0.007964123040437698,
0.0028742437716573477,
-0.0018807238666340709,
0.004691542126238346,
-0.012402275577187538,
-0.0008041393011808395,
-0.023038707673549652,
0.04297299310564995,
-0.028259985148906708,
-0.06694644689559937,
0.038539037108421326,
-0.07085712999105453,
0.020109260454773903,
0.001460324041545391,
0.0014639950823038816,
0.049912355840206146,
-0.02594558522105217,
0.0008223677286878228,
-0.03757276013493538,
-0.028740663081407547,
0.03337514027953148,
-0.07462829351425171,
-0.035983964800834656,
0.025680823251605034,
-0.050139084458351135,
0.010837196372449398,
-0.04243791848421097,
-0.002668545348569751,
-0.004916265141218901,
0.16647927463054657,
-0.0011541391722857952,
-0.004960660357028246,
-0.06482207775115967,
0.06976216286420822,
-0.0028182310052216053,
-0.02132517658174038,
-0.11613703519105911,
0.04333868995308876,
-0.0033509607892483473,
-0.020106570795178413,
0.016554009169340134,
-0.043971188366413116,
0.020619438961148262,
-0.009089959785342216,
0.009713641367852688,
0.039391469210386276,
-0.012487754225730896,
0.009350251406431198,
-0.08647788316011429,
-0.04851773753762245,
0.02447775937616825,
-0.008494960144162178,
0.023063570261001587,
-0.012638214975595474,
-0.05100997909903526,
0.03675990551710129,
0.03771744668483734,
0.030916057527065277,
-0.028798431158065796,
-0.01926880143582821,
-0.019831717014312744,
0.03583517670631409,
0.08063048869371414,
0.00649732630699873,
0.03545527532696724,
-0.041958946734666824,
0.006693818140774965,
-0.024078864604234695,
0.09502369910478592,
0.054634999483823776,
0.004220988135784864,
-0.05180729925632477,
0.01021517813205719,
-0.041098661720752716,
-0.03574559465050697,
0.06131820008158684,
-0.0030944310128688812,
0.08796171098947525,
0.006000818684697151,
4.4925641867161134e-33,
-0.07716735452413559,
0.01899317093193531,
-0.03573813661932945,
0.0887979194521904,
-0.01755509153008461,
-0.0027626880910247564,
0.037273939698934555,
0.09013677388429642,
-0.09250447154045105,
0.0680299699306488,
0.022390201687812805,
-0.045089662075042725,
0.030878892168402672,
0.044495198875665665,
-0.005799654871225357,
0.03523358702659607,
0.06968843936920166,
-0.004063474480062723,
-0.028155116364359856,
-0.03572935611009598,
-0.030507177114486694,
-0.03237851336598396,
-0.0024998304434120655,
0.034929435700178146,
-0.04148077219724655,
0.030205287039279938,
0.04858911409974098,
0.0632987916469574,
-0.021693143993616104,
0.036800533533096313,
0.03896567225456238,
-0.023581488057971,
-0.05063262954354286,
-0.05820295587182045,
0.04826247692108154,
0.08404397964477539,
0.03678114339709282,
-0.0007768925279378891,
0.024848245084285736,
-0.05051735043525696,
0.039668887853622437,
-0.010082785040140152,
0.002244437113404274,
0.11697717010974884,
-0.021961307153105736,
-0.005805923603475094,
-0.048092879354953766,
0.003788944333791733,
0.035172659903764725,
0.07729728519916534,
-0.09319712221622467,
-0.011992926709353924,
-0.021968109533190727,
0.04129430651664734,
-0.022958293557167053,
0.004160518292337656,
-0.0432187058031559,
0.0702132061123848,
-0.01905948668718338,
0.0004752702370751649,
0.005480603780597448,
0.026761434972286224,
-0.033612821251153946,
0.01346849836409092,
-0.022746674716472626,
0.03873894736170769,
-0.024523282423615456,
-0.03632815554738045,
-0.0017924589337781072,
-0.052569907158613205,
0.006689464673399925,
-0.025846485048532486,
-0.1348353624343872,
0.0011394252069294453,
-0.047169335186481476,
-0.05347497761249542,
-0.018427148461341858,
-0.007304163184016943,
-0.009657083079218864,
-0.037726134061813354,
-0.033999841660261154,
0.01841733604669571,
-0.008003143593668938,
-0.005512353032827377,
-0.03353199362754822,
-0.0201805979013443,
0.021665804088115692,
0.01075822301208973,
-0.05747472122311592,
0.01969684660434723,
-0.007240809965878725,
0.023037107661366463,
0.12023406475782394,
0.0032419958151876926,
0.010150063782930374,
-1.3403668397415913e-8,
-0.046724583953619,
0.04062063992023468,
-0.05561641603708267,
-0.0018853341462090611,
0.056323979049921036,
0.049638908356428146,
-0.04154156893491745,
0.0325038842856884,
0.02574923262000084,
-0.018780937418341637,
0.06920813769102097,
0.02598794549703598,
-0.02782331220805645,
0.05757509544491768,
0.09128093719482422,
-0.01532574463635683,
-0.10472093522548676,
-0.027585938572883606,
-0.016222817823290825,
-0.035399287939071655,
-0.010461363941431046,
-0.013999390415847301,
-0.0002939800324384123,
-0.08362972736358643,
0.007932317443192005,
0.006960071157664061,
-0.04422977939248085,
0.07475824654102325,
0.07440952211618423,
-0.04058071970939636,
-0.0018266832921653986,
0.01985001191496849,
0.014382191933691502,
0.020585300400853157,
0.02213379554450512,
-0.06437048316001892,
-0.06369856745004654,
0.01613914780318737,
0.009907381609082222,
-0.0055595203302800655,
-0.05467313155531883,
-0.0233115516602993,
0.07046928256750107,
0.006468005012720823,
-0.047700025141239166,
-0.0036470729392021894,
0.007837599143385887,
-0.004974569659680128,
-0.01241857185959816,
-0.07781214267015457,
-0.0009409073390997946,
-0.008002524264156818,
0.006034235469996929,
0.08434933423995972,
0.10730371624231339,
0.011427774094045162,
0.013366665691137314,
-0.012747352942824364,
0.061454374343156815,
0.03564131259918213,
0.1587459295988083,
0.12640950083732605,
0.04654904082417488,
-0.015717294067144394
] | {
"pdf_file": "CTCGFUXUY5OISRT3B3UIQKMWPXEVKAUU.pdf",
"text": ""
} |
[
0.038459666073322296,
0.0749991238117218,
-0.005852545611560345,
-0.04916954040527344,
-0.024650217965245247,
0.014661162160336971,
0.006239013746380806,
0.08590865880250931,
0.02462506666779518,
0.020847098901867867,
-0.08428926765918732,
0.08483089506626129,
0.07146027684211731,
-0.07261809706687927,
0.017696941271424294,
0.07634605467319489,
0.03317533805966377,
0.020891951397061348,
-0.028196830302476883,
0.10561304539442062,
-0.01674257218837738,
-0.053595170378685,
0.047035347670316696,
0.06717183440923691,
0.03192733973264694,
-0.00969409104436636,
-0.020471416413784027,
-0.06858111172914505,
-0.05291888117790222,
0.03767508640885353,
0.04361305758357048,
0.02247897908091545,
0.017327988520264626,
0.008218958973884583,
0.03821045905351639,
-0.01651504822075367,
-0.10948829352855682,
0.11425233632326126,
-0.07263047248125076,
0.026109950616955757,
-0.01319868303835392,
-0.017137199640274048,
-0.1090754047036171,
0.03450678288936615,
0.015462632291018963,
-0.048338569700717926,
-0.013454236090183258,
0.05960141867399216,
0.002158203860744834,
0.06435912102460861,
-0.004947941284626722,
0.005259125027805567,
0.011970906518399715,
0.06242666393518448,
0.043742191046476364,
0.0032226513139903545,
-0.053588978946208954,
-0.026625869795680046,
-0.017857110127806664,
0.03573508933186531,
-0.06554403156042099,
-0.012551695108413696,
0.009421506896615028,
0.008235465735197067,
-0.08276350051164627,
0.031015297397971153,
0.0304548516869545,
-0.058615345507860184,
-0.016398556530475616,
-0.005909468978643417,
-0.04909384623169899,
-0.0004532838938757777,
0.07474172115325928,
-0.07844091206789017,
0.0031410204246640205,
-0.011776149272918701,
0.05779670551419258,
0.08017007261514664,
0.015052634291350842,
-0.034900933504104614,
0.06291044503450394,
-0.041432708501815796,
-0.05250425636768341,
0.016098858788609505,
0.10666370391845703,
-0.05268918722867966,
-0.017110472545027733,
-0.039264991879463196,
0.04270884394645691,
-0.09204856306314468,
-0.01831689476966858,
0.009708098135888577,
-0.01711871474981308,
-0.09104116261005402,
-0.05402340367436409,
-0.023566072806715965,
0.007742336485534906,
0.02393684722483158,
-0.009595025330781937,
-0.0014244543854147196,
0.022392909973859787,
-0.021044762805104256,
0.026949701830744743,
-0.08583950251340866,
-0.020130528137087822,
-0.049089834094047546,
0.1045948937535286,
0.04085687920451164,
0.09163259714841843,
0.056514907628297806,
-0.029777292162179947,
-0.014718781225383282,
0.042374011129140854,
0.06285050511360168,
-0.05914747714996338,
0.022451093420386314,
0.013915875926613808,
-0.0032300364691764116,
0.09118121862411499,
0.029866229742765427,
0.024103939533233643,
0.025797566398978233,
0.03581589460372925,
-0.024096757173538208,
-0.0233245100826025,
0.039992064237594604,
-0.07441259920597076,
4.852063419976186e-33,
0.1099102795124054,
0.049034181982278824,
-0.019930200651288033,
-0.05817507579922676,
-0.007343929260969162,
-0.0012146505760028958,
0.050220903009176254,
-0.010835058055818081,
-0.029289228841662407,
0.0161893367767334,
-0.09530434757471085,
-0.04138821363449097,
-0.06438983231782913,
0.1513456553220749,
-0.005801617633551359,
-0.05213729664683342,
-0.0637965202331543,
-0.0131505923345685,
0.012150261551141739,
0.07172050327062607,
-0.0612020418047905,
0.00030105700716376305,
-0.015059311874210835,
0.06867939233779907,
0.024310575798153877,
-0.006242934614419937,
-0.030837690457701683,
-0.02510603703558445,
0.054546747356653214,
-0.014864391647279263,
-0.041563406586647034,
0.04350746050477028,
0.08070609718561172,
-0.03435516357421875,
-0.046183399856090546,
0.027845241129398346,
0.04882293939590454,
0.04473728686571121,
-0.019238391891121864,
-0.04806356877088547,
-0.06904260814189911,
0.05449393019080162,
0.07684475183486938,
-0.030714157968759537,
-0.026828764006495476,
-0.0245744027197361,
0.0073871128261089325,
-0.033197253942489624,
-0.06448852270841599,
0.006842272821813822,
-0.0375165231525898,
0.02732395939528942,
-0.039144087582826614,
0.06445235759019852,
-0.0479915551841259,
-0.12119946628808975,
-0.07507165521383286,
-0.03975830227136612,
0.04369844123721123,
-0.0009305810090154409,
-0.030412213876843452,
-0.042619138956069946,
0.017570145428180695,
-0.01992051675915718,
0.005290620028972626,
0.11032821983098984,
-0.034342844039201736,
-0.026292920112609863,
-0.013037865050137043,
0.08665294200181961,
0.004002807661890984,
0.006405861582607031,
-0.03418375179171562,
-0.01157938502728939,
-0.023150734603405,
0.04675227403640747,
0.04382764920592308,
-0.03145435079932213,
0.1173470988869667,
0.011121758259832859,
0.06473813205957413,
-0.06231231614947319,
0.02338324300944805,
0.012452335096895695,
0.06180298700928688,
0.01548794936388731,
0.049063052982091904,
0.020143793895840645,
-0.03707972541451454,
-0.07066776603460312,
-0.050371553748846054,
-0.038621604442596436,
0.013650103472173214,
0.0234590582549572,
0.07031159102916718,
-7.683734169533057e-33,
-0.03117343597114086,
0.07526895403862,
0.10259571671485901,
0.020324211567640305,
0.02080363593995571,
0.05379214137792587,
-0.04880067706108093,
-0.04958337917923927,
0.0849202573299408,
-0.05591324716806412,
-0.07480993121862411,
0.08422820270061493,
0.01681562513113022,
-0.0019911862909793854,
-0.07466477900743484,
-0.057796284556388855,
-0.019259033724665642,
-0.05340372025966644,
0.021987512707710266,
-0.03635350987315178,
-0.012775585986673832,
0.11068567633628845,
-0.026453454047441483,
0.08370368927717209,
0.005136729218065739,
0.010843941010534763,
-0.009271085262298584,
-0.043986596167087555,
0.040015507489442825,
-0.04117658734321594,
-0.08070355653762817,
-0.02130572497844696,
-0.03926574066281319,
-0.05480322614312172,
-0.013129698112607002,
0.021406248211860657,
-0.06373661011457443,
0.017422573640942574,
-0.028536243364214897,
-0.021921904757618904,
0.0819532722234726,
-0.13012352585792542,
-0.02689962089061737,
0.006190318148583174,
0.03740342706441879,
-0.07233007997274399,
-0.10725793242454529,
-0.027378851547837257,
0.06457946449518204,
0.0027030473574995995,
-0.021573452278971672,
-0.03031356818974018,
0.03220953419804573,
0.04387466982007027,
-0.027094395831227303,
-0.011358574032783508,
0.009033921174705029,
-0.04289954528212547,
0.05007081478834152,
-0.08510183542966843,
-0.04702093079686165,
0.07251161336898804,
-0.07758884131908417,
0.011400391347706318,
-0.004137872718274593,
0.0032645699102431536,
0.029368609189987183,
-0.040452923625707626,
-0.017441224306821823,
-0.0430317185819149,
-0.018128762021660805,
-0.10369101911783218,
-0.0023955670185387135,
-0.03706502541899681,
0.044883083552122116,
-0.017115166410803795,
-0.06325913965702057,
-0.007570205256342888,
-0.0032463031820952892,
0.09587394446134567,
0.010876264423131943,
-0.06387574225664139,
0.073101706802845,
-0.12773698568344116,
-0.03501346334815025,
-0.009299523197114468,
-0.0036772657185792923,
-0.03503062576055527,
-0.0801023542881012,
0.08948870748281479,
-0.03916476294398308,
0.01639694906771183,
-0.000005678512479789788,
-0.0334196500480175,
-0.05997183918952942,
-4.8719236644956254e-8,
0.11552589386701584,
-0.018607567995786667,
-0.021429505199193954,
0.041845232248306274,
-0.05184663459658623,
-0.07929328083992004,
-0.05692024528980255,
0.069670669734478,
-0.024749355390667915,
0.009042364545166492,
0.14193406701087952,
0.1361922323703766,
-0.04924359172582626,
-0.049959078431129456,
-0.04445025324821472,
0.037109293043613434,
-0.07227414101362228,
0.02390357293188572,
0.0018723626853898168,
-0.016964474692940712,
-0.06541585922241211,
0.029036445543169975,
-0.07933705300092697,
0.0023262123577296734,
0.006051527801901102,
0.0422491692006588,
0.03777376934885979,
0.050925664603710175,
-0.032704588025808334,
0.00917773973196745,
-0.023274265229701996,
-0.04715478792786598,
0.042068153619766235,
0.05457409843802452,
0.00799589604139328,
-0.03620116412639618,
-0.02885807864367962,
-0.015804309397935867,
0.10609310120344162,
-0.03145003318786621,
0.034121084958314896,
-0.054856088012456894,
-0.030198916792869568,
-0.011865491978824139,
-0.03360174223780632,
-0.042768146842718124,
-0.041383009403944016,
-0.013172107748687267,
-0.008437557145953178,
-0.01839376986026764,
0.06193672865629196,
0.09899687767028809,
0.02868809923529625,
-0.04870467633008957,
-0.010420854203402996,
-0.03150888532400131,
-0.017911167815327644,
-0.010766314342617989,
-0.030837923288345337,
-0.10022826492786407,
-0.024149850010871887,
-0.11076124757528305,
0.01970672234892845,
-0.020331231877207756
] | {
"pdf_file": "FMKUKISD27PIQH3UAZ5GCM66QIJJV3G4.pdf",
"text": "Democratic Medicare Drug Reforms Could Save Seniors Billions of Dollars\n \nDemocratic members of Congress have proposed reforms of the Medicare drug benefit that\ncould save the average senior almost $500 per year and eliminate the donut hole, without any\nincreased costs to the taxpayer.\n \nA new report released by Rep. Waxman finds that under Democratic proposals:\n \n - Almost 14 million Medicare beneficiaries could save over $60 billion in premiums,\ncopays, and other out-of-pocket drug costs. Democrats have proposed allowing the\nMedicare program to negotiate for lower drug prices, which could reduce prices by 25% or\nmore. There are 8.7 million Medicare beneficiaries nationwide enrolled in Medicare drug plans\nwho pay their own premiums and copays, and they could expect average savings of almost\n$500 annually if Medicare negotiated for 25% lower drug prices. The total savings over the next\ndecade for these beneficiaries would be $61 billion. If beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare HMOs\nreceived similar discounts, the total savings over the next decade would be $96 billion.\n \n - Over six million Medicare beneficiaries could avoid the “donut hole.” Drug benefits\nunder standard Medicare drug plans end once beneficiaries have used $2,250 worth of drugs\nand do not begin again until they have used over $5,100 worth of drugs. The latest estimates\nindicate that 6.2 million beneficiaries nationwide will hit the donut hole this year, resulting in\naverage out-of-pocket costs of $1,700 per beneficiary. Democratic reform proposals in\nCongress would provide enough savings to eliminate or significantly reduce the size of the\ndonut hole. \n - Over one million Medicare beneficiaries could avoid hundreds of dollars in\npenalties. Enrollment in the Medicare drug program has been well below expectations,\nwith over four million Medicare beneficiaries failing to sign up with a Medicare drug plan prior to\nthe May 15, 2006, deadline. An estimated 1.1 million of these beneficiaries are now subject to\nlifetime penalties that could cost each individual almost $500 to over $1,000 over the next\ndecade. Democratic reform proposals would give these beneficiaries an opportunity to\nparticipate in a Medicare drug plan without these unnecessary penalties. \n Documents and Links\n \n - Benefits of Proposed Democratic Medicare Drug Program Reforms \n \n 1 / 1"
} |
[
-0.00769582437351346,
0.041769105941057205,
0.019796771928668022,
0.014872601255774498,
-0.0019119818462058902,
0.007014475297182798,
-0.011356892064213753,
-0.014686335809528828,
0.04337254911661148,
0.0036866911686956882,
0.11368183046579361,
0.05076929181814194,
-0.003546372288838029,
-0.05527752637863159,
-0.07295770198106766,
-0.006155007053166628,
-0.013872047886252403,
-0.0028240166138857603,
-0.07066838443279266,
-0.010742465034127235,
0.020361395552754402,
-0.040296655148267746,
-0.02863176167011261,
0.05614116042852402,
-0.014590462669730186,
0.09402460604906082,
0.025480329990386963,
-0.0792926698923111,
-0.020788991823792458,
-0.04503899812698364,
-0.03146032616496086,
-0.018817657604813576,
0.05978722870349884,
0.04823701083660126,
0.022148415446281433,
0.00012289838923607022,
0.12770527601242065,
0.04912405461072922,
0.042613983154296875,
0.01837352104485035,
-0.06406643241643906,
-0.010415593162178993,
0.017169181257486343,
0.047663331031799316,
-0.02924104407429695,
-0.010763115249574184,
-0.08419252932071686,
-0.08310884982347488,
-0.048865772783756256,
-0.017481844872236252,
0.044723931699991226,
0.014573412016034126,
0.046505119651556015,
0.05368128791451454,
0.018959233537316322,
-0.029702790081501007,
-0.04005772992968559,
-0.07896969467401505,
-0.03103909268975258,
0.016438590362668037,
-0.0976502075791359,
0.024546360597014427,
-0.012168856337666512,
0.057701706886291504,
-0.0320487879216671,
0.028219563886523247,
-0.01810399629175663,
-0.03740008920431137,
0.021627144888043404,
-0.025724180042743683,
0.005211001727730036,
0.017736192792654037,
0.07954183220863342,
0.046867161989212036,
0.09340912103652954,
0.04074888303875923,
-0.056440237909555435,
0.0016561367083340883,
0.08746804296970367,
-0.0016776114935055375,
0.00586396548897028,
-0.021158970892429352,
-0.043830376118421555,
0.048778682947158813,
0.006533004809170961,
0.04351754114031792,
-0.028946617618203163,
-0.04451579228043556,
-0.07271341234445572,
0.008532043546438217,
0.028547612950205803,
0.05722673237323761,
0.002381335711106658,
0.0646856427192688,
0.02612888440489769,
0.0001381198817398399,
0.016076087951660156,
-0.05745948851108551,
-0.021397899836301804,
0.057505764067173004,
-0.030798105522990227,
0.1282287836074829,
0.017074186354875565,
0.010169160552322865,
-0.05044221132993698,
-0.10290372371673584,
0.09734068810939789,
-0.055510081350803375,
-0.0026575259398669004,
0.01188848540186882,
0.011658212170004845,
-0.045673470944166183,
-0.03407018259167671,
0.02187289111316204,
-0.011434615589678288,
-0.07013264298439026,
0.05701511353254318,
0.05574402958154678,
0.002345924498513341,
-0.029572365805506706,
0.014421607367694378,
0.06340964883565903,
0.022565560415387154,
-0.03634513542056084,
-0.03106558695435524,
0.000347704830346629,
-0.03739422932267189,
7.018544691605771e-33,
0.04546642303466797,
-0.050645388662815094,
-0.047126710414886475,
0.015681367367506027,
-0.022086728364229202,
-0.03457313030958176,
-0.013995946384966373,
-0.006370816379785538,
0.029947197064757347,
0.04498612508177757,
-0.0272439606487751,
-0.014102671295404434,
0.03229746222496033,
0.012360280379652977,
0.0502665638923645,
0.08610253781080246,
-0.023059919476509094,
0.009300927631556988,
-0.06223645806312561,
0.0481344498693943,
0.05483260005712509,
-0.05692315474152565,
0.01833968237042427,
-0.014378264546394348,
-0.027054600417613983,
0.061431873589754105,
-0.03346136957406998,
-0.0005310140550136566,
0.049881696701049805,
0.022625785320997238,
-0.024610091000795364,
0.03989773616194725,
-0.09212855249643326,
0.013253230601549149,
0.041937265545129776,
0.05807158350944519,
0.10536626726388931,
0.010921205393970013,
0.029576271772384644,
-0.006000571884214878,
0.048527516424655914,
-0.0057444581761956215,
0.0701267197728157,
-0.033585406839847565,
0.047444138675928116,
0.05316042900085449,
0.07650769501924515,
-0.02511502429842949,
0.0411313995718956,
0.03515230491757393,
-0.08112253993749619,
0.036677516996860504,
-0.1296677142381668,
-0.156077042222023,
-0.041613008826971054,
-0.04014687240123749,
0.01801910437643528,
-0.00625936035066843,
-0.04525157809257507,
-0.004344496410340071,
-0.034527428448200226,
0.08019400388002396,
-0.025847971439361572,
-0.04339444264769554,
-0.06595898419618607,
-0.08423340320587158,
-0.09094900637865067,
-0.11441933363676071,
0.09192764014005661,
-0.05688546970486641,
-0.010291889309883118,
0.017129620537161827,
0.016773013398051262,
-0.022234804928302765,
-0.0012767547741532326,
-0.03581041470170021,
0.020756252110004425,
0.06598255038261414,
0.031869664788246155,
-0.005918401293456554,
0.07888030260801315,
-0.11580319702625275,
-0.03584614023566246,
-0.04057025909423828,
0.059780657291412354,
-0.04152590408921242,
0.03878892585635185,
0.011351440101861954,
-0.09657410532236099,
-0.025561492890119553,
-0.036336082965135574,
-0.01821512170135975,
-0.04444358870387077,
0.040767502039670944,
-0.10844781994819641,
-9.1331363365122e-33,
-0.057434987276792526,
0.007339654956012964,
-0.03420284762978554,
-0.038310740143060684,
0.0027483568992465734,
-0.06587975472211838,
0.05894908308982849,
-0.008405966684222221,
0.017323873937129974,
-0.0378677174448967,
-0.015256207436323166,
0.012462116777896881,
0.05088113993406296,
0.04328767955303192,
-0.025474464520812035,
0.02660859189927578,
-0.07956762611865997,
0.009858296252787113,
-0.06441245973110199,
-0.01952207274734974,
0.06280255317687988,
0.0807364359498024,
-0.05574983358383179,
0.07577008008956909,
0.006126840598881245,
-0.01572280377149582,
0.04446288198232651,
-0.06661281734704971,
0.009216101840138435,
0.010115117765963078,
0.06322818249464035,
-0.06541572511196136,
-0.05933060497045517,
0.012095071375370026,
-0.12384721636772156,
-0.10222229361534119,
0.004786371253430843,
0.012424033135175705,
-0.08347763866186142,
0.02531106397509575,
0.06334368884563446,
-0.006949275266379118,
-0.05752763897180557,
-0.003655970562249422,
0.03648922219872475,
0.12208673357963562,
0.07875756174325943,
0.01034999918192625,
-0.02450592815876007,
0.08780106157064438,
-0.03992239758372307,
0.004127196501940489,
0.03137137368321419,
0.10552280396223068,
0.06541283428668976,
0.0168867539614439,
0.04569464176893234,
-0.010235261172056198,
-0.02420220524072647,
0.05325044319033623,
0.04854882135987282,
0.023327138274908066,
-0.045290589332580566,
0.0796043798327446,
-0.012834509834647179,
-0.036226458847522736,
-0.0049374764785170555,
0.014785491861402988,
-0.05530880019068718,
0.05012917146086693,
0.026452582329511642,
-0.038867708295583725,
0.0010127482237294316,
-0.17170456051826477,
0.00516623305156827,
-0.00646204175427556,
-0.08879656344652176,
0.011363034136593342,
-0.054240137338638306,
0.04133674502372742,
-0.014299252070486546,
-0.010958448052406311,
-0.0704994723200798,
0.0525667667388916,
0.0010565243428573012,
-0.044912464916706085,
0.1108543798327446,
-0.01694501005113125,
-0.03261137753725052,
0.036916445940732956,
-0.001845566090196371,
0.04180939123034477,
-0.041575729846954346,
-0.05742461606860161,
-0.041054777801036835,
-6.626193993497509e-8,
0.03603513911366463,
-0.029611842706799507,
-0.02755778655409813,
0.023484157398343086,
0.07317136973142624,
-0.014053139835596085,
-0.05418192222714424,
-0.018925050273537636,
-0.01460755430161953,
0.0730360820889473,
0.09517628699541092,
-0.027223123237490654,
-0.08159906417131424,
-0.08807264268398285,
0.0933971107006073,
-0.01915394701063633,
-0.021414730697870255,
-0.023177100345492363,
-0.003666807198897004,
-0.04778791591525078,
-0.02360859140753746,
-0.047319550067186356,
-0.005248493514955044,
0.02638593502342701,
0.023184651508927345,
0.025753865018486977,
0.03628909960389137,
0.0015127344522625208,
-0.039316706359386444,
-0.0006278854561969638,
-0.01579487882554531,
0.019350973889231682,
0.053631849586963654,
-0.0593903623521328,
0.014355686493217945,
0.005724932067096233,
-0.060445718467235565,
0.03361355513334274,
0.059409238398075104,
0.03861558437347412,
-0.06806880235671997,
-0.16296158730983734,
0.0314546599984169,
0.07843095064163208,
0.07370340079069138,
-0.005747539922595024,
-0.047506291419267654,
-0.01927974261343479,
0.07589050382375717,
-0.023800881579518318,
-0.024013401940464973,
-0.0884331613779068,
0.004105465952306986,
-0.010779906995594501,
0.008237684145569801,
0.05237768962979317,
-0.0030808220617473125,
0.04029357060790062,
-0.08862084895372391,
-0.058489780873060226,
0.12809692323207855,
0.020377233624458313,
-0.11285699903964996,
0.05153230205178261
] | {
"pdf_file": "TBI3APZQ4LEU3AO3OLYNCZLYYOO4ZOLB.pdf",
"text": "January 29, 2010 Page 1\nRegents Exams\nAll Students General-Education Students Students with Disabilities\nTotal \nTestedPercentage of students \nscoring at or above:Total \nTestedPercentage of students \nscoring at or above:Total \nTestedPercentage of students \nscoring at or above:\n55 65 85 55 65 85 55 65 85\nComprehensive English\nMathematics A\nMathematics B\nIntegrated Algebra\nGeometry\nGlobal History \nand Geography\nU.S. History \nand Government\nLiving Environment\nPhysical Setting / \nEarth Science\nPhysical Setting /Chemistry\nPhysical Setting /Physics\nnote \nThe — symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, \ndata for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students.\nThe New York State \nSchool Report Card\nComprehensive \nInformation Report \n2008 – 09\nSchool CHARLES D'AMICO HIGH SCHOOL\nDistrict ALBION CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT\nSchool ID 45-01-01-06-0003\nPrincipal MICKEY EDWARDS\nTelephone (585) 589-2040\nGrades 9-12, US\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07104\n203\n223\n10\n227\n186\n157\n126\n120\n188\n93\nN/A\n154\nN/A\nN/A\n207\n273\n264\n184\n213\n231\n233\n202\n148\n146\n88\n79\n31\n65\n66\n37\n27\n4291%\n94%\n90%\n70%\n95%\n97%\n85%\n85%\n85%\n90%\n61%\nN/A\n88%\nN/A\nN/A\n87%\n91%\n80%\n96%\n97%\n95%\n98%\n98%\n98%\n95%\n95%\n95%\n84%\n89%\n91%\n92%\n93%\n90%75%\n83%\n83%\n20%\n85%\n88%\n76%\n79%\n75%\n77%\n39%\nN/A\n80%\nN/A\nN/A\n80%\n85%\n69%\n94%\n95%\n89%\n94%\n89%\n94%\n91%\n93%\n81%\n65%\n71%\n71%\n81%\n78%\n74%16%\n16%\n17%\n10%\n34%\n34%\n24%\n17%\n28%\n2%\n0%\nN/A\n14%\nN/A\nN/A\n26%\n29%\n23%\n53%\n59%\n46%\n41%\n38%\n36%\n34%\n40%\n24%\n13%\n11%\n8%\n27%\n4%\n29%99\n187\n209\n10\n203\n174\n153\n123\n116\n168\n78\nN/A\n140\nN/A\nN/A\n193\n252\n247\n171\n201\n219\n216\n188\n139\n137\n78\n76\n31\n62\n63\n36\n27\n4193%\n94%\n91%\n70%\n96%\n97%\n–\n–\n–\n92%\n56%\nN/A\n90%\nN/A\nN/A\n88%\n91%\n81%\n95%\n98%\n96%\n98%\n97%\n98%\n95%\n97%\n–\n84%\n–\n–\n–\n93%\n–76%\n83%\n84%\n20%\n88%\n89%\n–\n–\n–\n80%\n35%\nN/A\n81%\nN/A\nN/A\n80%\n85%\n70%\n94%\n96%\n89%\n95%\n88%\n94%\n91%\n96%\n–\n65%\n–\n–\n–\n78%\n–17%\n16%\n18%\n10%\n38%\n35%\n–\n–\n–\n2%\n0%\nN/A\n15%\nN/A\nN/A\n26%\n30%\n23%\n53%\n59%\n47%\n43%\n40%\n37%\n36%\n41%\n–\n13%\n–\n–\n–\n4%\n–5\n16\n14\n0\n24\n12\n4\n3\n4\n20\n15\nN/A\n14\nN/A\nN/A\n14\n21\n17\n13\n12\n12\n17\n14\n9\n9\n10\n3\n0\n3\n3\n1\n0\n160%\n88%\n71%\n92%\n100%\n–\n–\n–\n75%\n87%\nN/A\n64%\nN/A\nN/A\n79%\n90%\n71%\n100%\n92%\n75%\n94%\n100%\n100%\n100%\n80%\n–\n–\n–\n–\n–60%\n75%\n64%\n67%\n75%\n–\n–\n–\n50%\n60%\nN/A\n64%\nN/A\nN/A\n71%\n86%\n59%\n92%\n83%\n75%\n76%\n100%\n100%\n89%\n70%\n–\n–\n–\n–\n–0%\n19%\n0%\n4%\n17%\n–\n–\n–\n0%\n0%\nN/A\n0%\nN/A\nN/A\n14%\n10%\n12%\n46%\n50%\n25%\n18%\n7%\n11%\n11%\n30%\n–\n–\n–\n–\n– January 29, 2010 Page 2\nRegents Exams in Languages Other Than English\nRegents Exams\nAll Students General-Education Students Students with Disabilities\nTotal \nTestedPercentage of students \nscoring at or above:Total \nTestedPercentage of students \nscoring at or above:Total \nTestedPercentage of students \nscoring at or above:\n55 65 85 55 65 85 55 65 85\nComprehensive French\nComprehensive German\nComprehensive Hebrew\nComprehensive Italian\nComprehensive Latin\nComprehensive Spanish\nnote \nThe — symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, \ndata for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students.\nSchool CHARLES D'AMICO HIGH SCHOOL District ALBION CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT\nSchool ID 45-01-01-06-0003\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–070\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n10\n43\n96\n91\n74\n100%\n100%\n98%\n100%\n99%\n100%\n100%\n89%\n98%\n97%\n80%\n60%\n54%\n49%\n62%0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n10\n43\n96\n91\n73\n100%\n100%\n98%\n100%\n–\n100%\n100%\n89%\n98%\n–\n80%\n60%\n54%\n49%\n–0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n1\n–\n–\n– January 29, 2010 Page 3\nRegents Competency Tests\nRegents Competency Tests\nAll Students General-Education Students Students with Disabilities\nTotal Tested Percent Passing: Total Tested Percent Passing: Total Tested Percent Passing:\nMathematics\nScience\nReading\nWriting\nGlobal Studies\nU.S. History \nand Government\nnote \nThe — symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, \ndata for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students.\nSchool CHARLES D'AMICO HIGH SCHOOL District ALBION CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT\nSchool ID 45-01-01-06-0003\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–0723\n16\n12\n7\n6\n7\n18\n20\n16\n15\n12\n9\n2\n5\n6\n2\n2\n891%\n100%\n67%\n43%\n50%\n43%\n39%\n55%\n50%\n93%\n58%\n67%\n–\n60%\n83%\n–\n–\n75%2\n0\n2\n1\n1\n2\n0\n2\n0\n0\n2\n1\n0\n2\n1\n0\n0\n2–\n–\n–\n–\n–\n–\n–\n–\n–\n–\n–21\n16\n10\n6\n5\n5\n18\n18\n16\n15\n10\n8\n2\n3\n5\n2\n2\n6–\n100%\n–\n–\n–\n–\n39%\n–\n50%\n93%\n–\n–\n–\n–\n–\n–\n–\n– January 29, 2010 Page 4\nEnglish as a Second Language Achievement Test\nNew York State English as a Second Language \nAchievement Test (NYSESLAT )\nAll Students General-Education Students Students with Disabilities\nTotal \nTestedPercent of students scoring \nin each performance level:Total \nTestedPercent of students scoring \nin each performance level:Total \nTestedPercent of students scoring \nin each performance level:\nBegin. Interm. Adv. Prof. Begin. Interm. Adv. Prof. Begin. Interm. Adv. Prof.\nListening \nand Speaking \n(Grades K –1)\nReading \nand Writing \n(Grades K –1)\nListening \nand Speaking \n(Grades 2–4)\nReading \nand Writing \n(Grades 2–4)\nListening \nand Speaking \n(Grades 5–6)\nReading \nand Writing \n(Grades 5–6)\nListening \nand Speaking \n(Grades 7–8)\nReading \nand Writing \n(Grades 7–8)\nListening \nand Speaking \n(Grades 9–12)\nReading \nand Writing \n(Grades 9–12)\nnote \nThe — symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, \ndata for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students.\nSchool CHARLES D'AMICO HIGH SCHOOL District ALBION CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT\nSchool ID 45-01-01-06-0003\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–070\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n8\n0\n0\n8\n0\n13%\n13%\n0%\n50%\n13%\n13%\n75%\n25%\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n8\n0\n0\n8\n0\n13%\n13%\n0%\n50%\n13%\n13%\n75%\n25%\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n January 29, 2010 Page 5\nElementary /Middle -Level Social Studies\nAll Students General-Education Students Students with Disabilities\nTotal \nTestedPercentage of students \nscoring at level:Total \nTestedPercentage of students \nscoring at level:Total \nTestedPercentage of students \nscoring at level:\n1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4\nElementary \nLevel\nMiddle Level\n2005 Total Cohort Performance on \nRegents Exams After Four Years\nAll Students General-Education Students Students with DisabilitiesCohort \nEnrollmentPercentage of \nstudents scoring:\nCohort \nEnrollmentPercentage of \nstudents scoring:\nCohort \nEnrollmentPercentage of \nstudents scoring:\n55–64 65–84 85–100 55–64 65–84 85–100 55–64 65–84 85–100\nGlobal History \nand Geography\nU.S. History \nand Government\nScience\nNew York State Alternate Assessments (NYSAA ) \nAll Students\nTotal \nTestedNumber of students scoring \nat Level:\n1 2 3 4\nElementary Level The New York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA) \nis for students with severe cognitive disabilities. Results \nfor students taking the NYSAA in English language arts, \nmathematics, and science at the elementary and middle \nlevels are available in the Accountability and Overview \nReport part of The New York State Report Card .Social Studies\nMiddle Level\nSocial Studies\nSecondary Level\nEnglish Language Arts\nMathematics\nSocial Studies\nScience\nnote \nThe — symbol indicates that data for a group of students have been suppressed. If a group has fewer than five students, \ndata for that group and the next smallest group(s) are suppressed to protect the privacy of individual students.Other Assessments\nSchool CHARLES D'AMICO HIGH SCHOOL District ALBION CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT\nSchool ID 45-01-01-06-0003\n2008–09\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n0\n197\n197\n1972%\n2%\n1%48%\n31%\n44%31%\n50%\n39%\n173\n173\n1731%\n1%\n1%50%\n32%\n45%36%\n55%\n44%\n24\n24\n244%\n4%\n0%33%\n25%\n38%0%\n13%\n0%\n2008–09\n0\n0\n2\n2\n2\n2\n–\n–\n–\n–\n–\n–\n–\n–\n–\n–\n–\n–\n–\n–\n–\n– January 29, 2010 Page 6\nHigh School Information\nHigh School Completers\nAll Students General-Education Students Students with Disabilities\nNumber \nof StudentsPercentage \nof GraduatesNumber \nof StudentsPercentage \nof GraduatesNumber \nof StudentsPercentage \nof Graduates\nTotal Graduates\nReceiving a Regents Diploma\nReceiving a Regents Diploma \nwith Advanced Designation\nReceiving an \nIndividualized Education \nProgram (IEP) Diploma\nnote Students receiving Regents diplomas and Regents diplomas with advanced designation are considered graduates; recipients of IEP diplomas are not.\nHigh School Noncompleters\nAll Students General-Education Students Students with Disabilities\nNumber \nof StudentsPercentage \nof StudentsNumber \nof StudentsPercentage \nof StudentsNumber \nof StudentsPercentage \nof Students\nDropped Out\nEntered Approved High \nSchool Equivalency \nPreparation Program\nTotal Noncompleters\nPost-secondary Plans of 2008–09 Completers\nAll Students General-Education Students Students with Disabilities\nNumber \nof StudentsPercentage \nof StudentsNumber \nof StudentsPercentage \nof StudentsNumber \nof StudentsPercentage \nof Students\nTo 4-year College\nTo 2-year College\nTo Other Post-secondary\nTo the Military\nTo Employment\nTo Adult Services\nTo Other Known Plans\nPlan Unknown\nSchool CHARLES D'AMICO HIGH SCHOOL District ALBION CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT\nSchool ID 45-01-01-06-0003\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07168\n206\n169\n160\n196\n158\n73\n91\n80\n4\n5\n1\n95%\n95%\n93%\n43%\n44%\n47%\nN/A\nN/A\nN/A154\n193\n155\n151\n188\n152\n73\n91\n80\n0\n0\n0\n98%\n97%\n98%\n47%\n47%\n52%\n14\n13\n14\n9\n8\n6\n0\n0\n0\n4\n5\n1\n64%\n62%\n43%\nN/A\nN/A\nN/A\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–07\n2008–09\n2007–08\n2006–0715\n18\n37\n4\n3\n4\n19\n21\n412%\n2%\n4%\n1%\n0%\n0%\n2%\n3%\n5%12\n13\n29\n4\n3\n3\n16\n16\n322%\n2%\n4%\n1%\n0%\n0%\n2%\n2%\n4%3\n5\n8\n0\n0\n1\n3\n5\n94%\n6%\n9%\n1%\n4%\n6%\n10%\n54\n87\n1\n7\n23\n0\n0\n031%\n51%\n1%\n4%\n13%\n53\n77\n1\n7\n16\n0\n0\n034%\n50%\n1%\n5%\n10%\n1\n10\n0\n0\n7\n0\n0\n06%\n56%\n39%\n January 29, 2010 Page 7\nMore Information about the School\nFinancial Information\n \nfrom Families Receiving Public Assistance2008 –09 Estimated Percentage of Students\nSchool CHARLES D'AMICO HIGH SCHOOL District ALBION CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT\nSchool ID 45-01-01-06-0003\n31-40%"
} |
[
0.0033241307828575373,
-0.04452940449118614,
0.022443851456046104,
-0.015477214939892292,
-0.025029683485627174,
0.0016186587745323777,
-0.016878392547369003,
-0.07722944766283035,
-0.048626117408275604,
-0.0021662937942892313,
0.038867440074682236,
0.05303065478801727,
-0.0033845375292003155,
-0.004650393966585398,
-0.05903126671910286,
0.060215435922145844,
0.0589526928961277,
-0.02289985679090023,
-0.02171165868639946,
0.010158039629459381,
0.05229092761874199,
0.03579983860254288,
0.04981091991066933,
0.015682104974985123,
0.06853198260068893,
0.0678250789642334,
-0.017789585515856743,
-0.10891127586364746,
-0.031066374853253365,
0.00177538872230798,
-0.030963348224759102,
-0.01484144851565361,
0.028325894847512245,
-0.017454849556088448,
0.038359299302101135,
0.008496112190186977,
0.12604248523712158,
0.07721196860074997,
0.047653622925281525,
0.03314786031842232,
-0.10504817217588425,
-0.018607106059789658,
-0.018397746607661247,
0.06129194051027298,
0.03413983806967735,
-0.020533613860607147,
-0.09815392643213272,
-0.042893294245004654,
0.050100743770599365,
-0.02551298961043358,
-0.004491863306611776,
-0.028316795825958252,
0.013002719730138779,
0.04781191423535347,
-0.07679871469736099,
0.025648046284914017,
0.06831640750169754,
-0.011341703124344349,
-0.015481808222830296,
0.020489465445280075,
-0.093964584171772,
0.006943836342543364,
0.0194407869130373,
0.03553616255521774,
0.008503356017172337,
-0.04424102231860161,
-0.06082163751125336,
-0.04244216904044151,
-0.03426431119441986,
0.06223182752728462,
0.039603326469659805,
0.04960307106375694,
0.06353446841239929,
0.009895076043903828,
0.05634061619639397,
0.03190698102116585,
0.020480958744883537,
-0.00538232596591115,
0.0883980318903923,
0.03071041963994503,
0.031905706971883774,
-0.0482008159160614,
-0.0035636164247989655,
0.03070792555809021,
-0.0223990585654974,
0.009249228052794933,
-0.10671902447938919,
0.011077909730374813,
0.026164740324020386,
-0.04372989758849144,
-0.008433825336396694,
-0.04098918288946152,
-0.07339198887348175,
-0.014135101810097694,
0.040813032537698746,
-0.06409730762243271,
-0.03924379125237465,
-0.007604995276778936,
-0.04609278589487076,
0.04240615665912628,
-0.08555683493614197,
-0.057527922093868256,
0.030278271064162254,
-0.015687575563788414,
0.004059413447976112,
-0.017147671431303024,
0.06728685647249222,
-0.03793303295969963,
0.034099142998456955,
-0.013743259012699127,
-0.022601399570703506,
-0.016501612961292267,
0.0007871316047385335,
0.011748254299163818,
0.04256924241781235,
-0.04194169119000435,
-0.007495189551264048,
0.03572705388069153,
0.05349927023053169,
-0.040502455085515976,
-0.03655565157532692,
0.0591706782579422,
-0.028662020340561867,
0.014679200947284698,
-0.08525322377681732,
-0.1216854378581047,
-0.0475090891122818,
2.0634491183116152e-32,
0.0510064922273159,
0.028666559606790543,
0.01875811256468296,
-0.029514599591493607,
0.027818499132990837,
-0.023490499705076218,
-0.022647522389888763,
-0.04414760321378708,
-0.02452533319592476,
0.0014485659776255488,
0.05370262637734413,
-0.03472667932510376,
0.02819610759615898,
-0.03460759297013283,
0.05523648113012314,
-0.0654202550649643,
-0.13889065384864807,
0.04350084438920021,
-0.05100462585687637,
0.043534375727176666,
0.05407252162694931,
-0.014310543425381184,
0.04342955723404884,
-0.037203166633844376,
-0.10199542343616486,
-0.037748128175735474,
-0.021552663296461105,
-0.004594341851770878,
0.011061822064220905,
0.02433355152606964,
0.02275511622428894,
-0.02217685990035534,
-0.07109871506690979,
-0.035034194588661194,
0.020219670608639717,
-0.08454589545726776,
0.09200605005025864,
-0.05654003843665123,
-0.02729412540793419,
-0.10010313987731934,
0.07091058790683746,
0.028983915224671364,
0.018337206915020943,
0.023879611864686012,
-0.011828637681901455,
0.08354722708463669,
0.059243299067020416,
-0.06078428402543068,
0.06274491548538208,
0.01340492069721222,
-0.01734662428498268,
0.0013319574063643813,
-0.04774918407201767,
-0.10871806740760803,
-0.03220628574490547,
-0.02012319304049015,
0.03775225952267647,
0.04079955071210861,
0.07427653670310974,
-0.0028004604391753674,
-0.10705315321683884,
0.09764185547828674,
0.045513201504945755,
-0.10218946635723114,
0.009077135473489761,
-0.07841997593641281,
-0.05629933252930641,
-0.03596983477473259,
0.06299082189798355,
-0.04713982716202736,
-0.04167121648788452,
-0.04201940447092056,
-0.06615247577428818,
-0.02594585530459881,
0.016454944387078285,
-0.04070018231868744,
0.09311215579509735,
-0.056904613971710205,
0.09165605157613754,
-0.06434254348278046,
0.050120092928409576,
-0.04428436607122421,
-0.017611781135201454,
-0.09748589247465134,
-0.0037798206321895123,
-0.03374259173870087,
0.04961756616830826,
-0.08560443669557571,
-0.0312727615237236,
0.019526606425642967,
-0.0714661106467247,
-0.03737908974289894,
-0.02728918381035328,
-0.018136294558644295,
-0.03702068328857422,
-2.274153835834221e-32,
0.014085969887673855,
-0.029657846316695213,
0.024276599287986755,
0.04460884630680084,
-0.08801460266113281,
-0.05321895331144333,
0.011487040668725967,
0.10598036646842957,
0.05381632223725319,
-0.03838973864912987,
0.054031193256378174,
0.016490889713168144,
0.049159176647663116,
0.05438646674156189,
0.04677211493253708,
-0.050067950040102005,
0.03693503141403198,
0.04216088354587555,
-0.030757442116737366,
0.024357588961720467,
-0.007369986269623041,
0.039578475058078766,
-0.08602944761514664,
0.05285421013832092,
-0.048530831933021545,
0.024006525054574013,
0.018713846802711487,
-0.012278160080313683,
0.03763503581285477,
0.0005697252345271409,
-0.01724763587117195,
-0.010608833283185959,
-0.054274920374155045,
0.0712551549077034,
-0.06684400141239166,
0.03684573993086815,
-0.0357409231364727,
0.027532650157809258,
-0.11524873226881027,
-0.00155014474876225,
0.08036718517541885,
-0.014450629241764545,
-0.1037055030465126,
0.0687732845544815,
0.08392544090747833,
0.03361834958195686,
-0.04288463294506073,
0.08116526156663895,
-0.04013131931424141,
0.033280909061431885,
-0.06270699203014374,
0.012961103580892086,
-0.07925248891115189,
0.0015088734216988087,
0.13393445312976837,
-0.052489619702100754,
-0.003806907683610916,
-0.00839266087859869,
-0.07154489308595657,
-0.0353352390229702,
-0.016187986359000206,
-0.008417532779276371,
-0.059474579989910126,
-0.01181024219840765,
0.06196056306362152,
-0.057247500866651535,
0.005615092348307371,
-0.04250200092792511,
0.024772901087999344,
-0.04138299822807312,
0.06402669847011566,
0.0790136307477951,
-0.1298903524875641,
-0.08219458907842636,
0.0051614451222121716,
0.013213719241321087,
0.016601935029029846,
-0.006438455544412136,
-0.12927575409412384,
0.02910938672721386,
-0.07171439379453659,
0.0259108804166317,
-0.039693888276815414,
-0.0036149085499346256,
0.025089625269174576,
-0.0024800344835966825,
0.014370455406606197,
-0.023080160841345787,
0.00838586874306202,
0.038923200219869614,
0.062316447496414185,
0.0690579041838646,
0.05158040300011635,
-0.03200845792889595,
0.004864874295890331,
-6.64354047330562e-8,
-0.01647542230784893,
0.0737769678235054,
-0.01280677504837513,
-0.0016922364011406898,
0.08142176270484924,
-0.06292970478534698,
0.012698792852461338,
-0.0685669481754303,
-0.006861633155494928,
0.012227763421833515,
0.02941163443028927,
0.05758845433592796,
-0.013231771998107433,
-0.0460745170712471,
-0.010995560325682163,
0.020863458514213562,
-0.015802809968590736,
0.005376897286623716,
0.002921970095485449,
0.002149751177057624,
0.007089714519679546,
-0.009196532890200615,
0.06352464854717255,
0.04930577427148819,
-0.08838403970003128,
0.03456733375787735,
0.04177166894078255,
-0.02005944401025772,
-0.002049630042165518,
0.015732714906334877,
0.015907086431980133,
-0.004896731115877628,
-0.10738251358270645,
-0.14352121949195862,
-0.011837144382297993,
-0.06282597035169601,
-0.04650776460766792,
-0.003252348629757762,
0.08194546401500702,
0.007482797838747501,
-0.05793549865484238,
-0.00802395585924387,
0.05269045755267143,
0.057887300848960876,
-0.010553746484220028,
0.06759140640497208,
-0.07643644511699677,
0.005754711106419563,
0.022008366882801056,
-0.07914005219936371,
-0.1148485466837883,
-0.013189316727221012,
-0.11471020430326462,
-0.06641311198472977,
0.04593745246529579,
0.013501733541488647,
-0.041273441165685654,
0.010393748991191387,
-0.13388198614120483,
0.02388753555715084,
0.11148535460233688,
-0.018735915422439575,
-0.003754416713491082,
-0.021182522177696228
] | {
"pdf_file": "BFWOETAIBXJQILXW3TFPQFSKPR726RJ5.pdf",
"text": "March 28, 2002The University of the State of New York\nThe State Education Department\nAANNAALLYYSSEESS BBYY SSTTUUDDEENNTT SSUUBBGGRROOUUPP OOFF SSCCHHOOOOLL\nPPEERRFFOORRMMAANNCCEE IINN EENNGGLLIISSHH LLAANNGGUUAAGGEE AARRTTSS\nAANNDD MMAATTHHEEMMAATTIICCSS\nffoorr\nBBeeaavveerr RRiivveerr CCeennttrraall SScchhooooll DDiissttrriicctt\nHHiissttoorriiccaallllyy,, oonn SSttaattee aasssseessssmmeennttss tthhee aavveerraaggee ppeerrffoorrmmaannccee ooff BBllaacckk,, HHiissppaanniicc,, aanndd NNaattiivvee AAmmeerriiccaann\nssttuuddeennttss hhaass bbeeeenn lloowweerr tthhaann tthhaatt ooff WWhhiittee aanndd AAssiiaann ssttuuddeennttss.. SSiimmiillaarrllyy,, ssttuuddeennttss ffrroomm llooww--iinnccoommee\nffaammiilliieess hhaavvee nnoott ppeerrffoorrmmeedd aass wweellll aass tthhoossee ffrroomm hhiigghheerr iinnccoommee ffaammiilliieess.. AA hhiigghh pprriioorriittyy ooff tthhee BBooaarrdd ooff\nRReeggeennttss iiss ttoo eelliimmiinnaattee tthheessee ggaappss iinn ssttuuddeenntt ppeerrffoorrmmaannccee.. IInn aaddddiittiioonn,, TTiittllee 11 ooff tthhee ffeeddeerraall EElleemmeennttaarryy\naanndd SSeeccoonnddaarryy EEdduuccaattiioonn AAcctt iinncclluuddeess eexxpplliicciitt rreeqquuiirreemmeennttss ““ttoo eennssuurree tthhaatt ssttuuddeennttss sseerrvveedd bbyy TTiittllee 11 aarree\nggiivveenn tthhee ssaammee ooppppoorrttuunniittyy ttoo aacchhiieevvee ttoo hhiigghh ssttaannddaarrddss aanndd aarree hheelldd ttoo tthhee ssaammee hhiigghh eexxppeeccttaattiioonnss aass\naallll ssttuuddeennttss iinn eeaacchh SSttaattee..”” BBeeggiinnnniinngg wwiitthh tthhiiss rreeppoorrtt ccaarrdd,, NNeeww YYoorrkk SSttaattee wwiillll rreeppoorrtt ppeerrffoorrmmaannccee ddaattaa\nbbyy ggeennddeerr,, ddiissaabbiilliittyy ssttaattuuss,, rraacciiaall//eetthhnniicc ggrroouupp,, EEnngglliisshh pprrooffiicciieennccyy ssttaattuuss,, mmiiggrraanntt ssttaattuuss,, aanndd iinnccoommee\nlleevveell.. DDiissttrriicctt rreeppoorrttss ddoo nnoott sshhooww hhiigghh sscchhooooll ppeerrffoorrmmaannccee ddaattaa bbyy ggeennddeerr,, rraacciiaall//eetthhnniicc ggrroouupp,, mmiiggrraanntt\nssttaattuuss,, oorr iinnccoommee lleevveell bbeeccaauussee ddaattaa wweerree aavvaaiillaabbllee oonnllyy ffrroomm hhiigghh sscchhoooollss tthhaatt rreecceeiivveedd TTiittllee 11 ffuunnddiinngg..\nTThhee ppuurrppoossee ooff tthhee aannaallyysseess oonn tthhee ffoolllloowwiinngg ppaaggeess iiss ttoo ddeetteerrmmiinnee iiff ssttuuddeennttss wwhhoo ppeerrffoorrmm bbeellooww tthhee\nssttaannddaarrddss iinn tthhiiss ddiissttrriicctt tteenndd ttoo ffaallll iinnttoo ppaarrttiiccuullaarr ggrroouuppss,, ssuucchh aass mmiinnoorriittyy ssttuuddeennttss,, EEnngglliisshh llaanngguuaaggee\nlleeaarrnneerrss,, oorr eeccoonnoommiiccaallllyy ddiissaaddvvaannttaaggeedd ssttuuddeennttss.. IIff tthheessee aannaallyysseess pprroovviiddee eevviiddeennccee tthhaatt ssttuuddeennttss iinn\noonnee ooff tthhee ggrroouuppss aacchhiieevvee aatt aa lloowweerr lleevveell tthhaann ootthheerr ssttuuddeennttss,, tthhee ddiissttrriicctt aanndd ccoommmmuunniittyy sshhoouulldd eexxaammiinnee\ntthhee rreeaassoonnss ffoorr tthhiiss lloowweerr ppeerrffoorrmmaannccee aanndd mmaakkee nneecceessssaarryy cchhaannggeess iinn ccuurrrriiccuulluumm,, iinnssttrruuccttiioonn aanndd\nssttuuddeenntt ssuuppppoorrtt sseerrvviicceess ttoo rreemmeeddyy tthheessee ppeerrffoorrmmaannccee ggaappss..\nIItt iiss iimmppoorrttaanntt tthhaatt pprrooggrraammmmaattiicc cchhaannggeess bbee bbaasseedd oonn vvaalliidd aanndd rreelliiaabbllee ddaattaa.. IIff aa ddiissttrriicctt ddooeess nnoott hhaavvee\n2200 ssttuuddeennttss iinn aa ggrroouupp iinn aa ggiivveenn yyeeaarr,, tthhee ddiissttrriicctt sshhoouulldd eevvaalluuaattee rreessuullttss ffoorr ssttuuddeennttss iinn tthhiiss ggrroouupp oovveerr aa\nppeerriioodd ooff yyeeaarrss ttoo mmaakkee pprrooggrraammmmaattiicc ddeecciissiioonnss.. TToo pprrootteecctt tthhee pprriivvaaccyy ooff ssttuuddeennttss,, tthhee DDeeppaarrttmmeenntt’’ss\nppoolliiccyy iiss nneevveerr ttoo ppuubblliisshh ddaattaa ffoorr ggrroouuppss wwiitthh ffeewweerr tthhaann ffiivvee ssttuuddeennttss,, nnoorr ttoo ppuubblliisshh ddaattaa tthhaatt wwoouulldd\naallllooww rreeaaddeerrss ttoo eeaassiillyy ddeetteerrmmiinnee tthhee ppeerrffoorrmmaannccee ooff aa ggrroouupp ssmmaalllleerr tthhaann ffiivvee.. IIff tthhee nnuummbbeerr ooff ssttuuddeennttss\niinn ssmmaallll ggrroouupp rraacciiaall//eetthhnniicc ggrroouuppss eexxcceeeeddss ffoouurr,, tthhee aaggggrreeggaattee ppeerrffoorrmmaannccee ooff ssttuuddeennttss iinn tthheessee ggrroouuppss\niiss sshhoowwnn iinn tthhee llaasstt rrooww ((SSmmaallll GGrroouupp TToottaallss)) ooff RReessuullttss bbyy RRaaccee//EEtthhnniicciittyy.. 03/28/02EElleemmeennttaarryy EEnngglliisshh LLaanngguuaaggee AArrttss\nA description of the performance levels and summary results for all general-education students and all students with\ndisabilities can be found in the Overview of the New York State Report Card.\nCounts of Students\nNot TestedTestedPercentages\nof Tested\nStudentsStudent Subgroup\nALT ELLNo\nValid\nScoreLevel\n1Level\n2Level\n3Level\n4 TotalLevel\n2-4Level\n3-4\nResults by Race/Ethnicity\nAmerican Indian/Alaskan\nNative0 0 0 00000 0 % 0 %\nBlack 0 0 0 00000 0 % 0 %\nHispanic 0 0 0 ssss2ss\nAsian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0 00000 0 % 0 %\nWhite 00 0 s s s s 6 6 s s\nTotal 0 0 0 1 14 29 24 68 99% 78%\nSmall Group Totals (s) 0 0 0 1 14 29 24 68 99% 78%\nResults by Gender\nFemale 0 0 0 0 5 15 16 36 100% 86%\nMale 0 0 0 1 9 14 8 32 97% 69%\nTotal 0 0 0 1 14 29 24 68 99% 78%\nResults by English Proficiency Status\nEnglish Proficient 0 0 0 1 14 29 24 68 99% 78%\nLimited English Proficient 0 0 0 00000 0 % 0 %\nTotal 0 0 0 1 14 29 24 68 99% 78%\nResults by Income Level\nEconomically\nDisadvantaged0 0 0 0 5 7 6 18 100% 72%\nNot Disadvantaged 0 0 0 1 9 22 18 50 98% 80%\nTotal 0 0 0 1 14 29 24 68 99% 78%\nResults by Migrant Status\nMigrant Family 0 0 0 00000 0 % 0 %\nNot Migrant Family 0 0 0 1 14 29 24 68 99% 78%\nTotal 0 0 0 1 14 29 24 68 99% 78%\nNote. ALT designates severely disabled students eligible for the New York State Alternate Assessment; ELL\ndesignates English language learners eligible for an alternative assessment of proficiency in reading English; and No\nValid Score designates students who did not receive a valid test score because of absence from all or part of the test\nor because the test was administered under nonstandard conditions. 03/28/02EElleemmeennttaarryy MMaatthheemmaattiiccss\nA description of the performance levels and summary results for all general-education students and all students with\ndisabilities can be found in the Overview of the New York State Report Card.\nCounts of Students\nNot TestedTestedPercentages\nof Tested\nStudentsStudent Subgroup\nALT ELLNo\nValid\nScoreLevel\n1Level\n2Level\n3Level\n4 TotalLevel\n2-4Level\n3-4\nResults by Race/Ethnicity\nAmerican Indian/Alaskan\nNative0 0 0 00000 0 % 0 %\nBlack 0 0 0 00000 0 % 0 %\nHispanic 0 0 0 ssss2ss\nAsian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0 00000 0 % 0 %\nWhite 00 0 s s s s 6 5 s s\nTotal 0 0 0 1 3 29 34 67 99% 94%\nSmall Group Totals (s) 0 0 0 1 3 29 34 67 99% 94%\nResults by Gender\nFemale 0 0 0 1 2 14 19 36 97% 92%\nMale 0 0 0 0 1 15 15 31 100% 97%\nTotal 0 0 0 1 3 29 34 67 99% 94%\nResults by English Proficiency Status\nEnglish Proficient 0 0 0 1 3 29 34 67 99% 94%\nLimited English Proficient 0 0 0 00000 0 % 0 %\nTotal 0 0 0 1 3 29 34 67 99% 94%\nResults by Income Level\nEconomically\nDisadvantaged0 0 0 0 3 6 8 17 100% 82%\nNot Disadvantaged 0 0 0 1 0 23 26 50 98% 98%\nTotal 0 0 0 1 3 29 34 67 99% 94%\nResults by Migrant Status\nMigrant Family 0 0 0 00000 0 % 0 %\nNot Migrant Family 0 0 0 1 3 29 34 67 99% 94%\nTotal 0 0 0 1 3 29 34 67 99% 94%\nNote. ALT designates severely disabled students eligible for the New York State Alternate Assessment; ELL\ndesignates English language learners eligible for an alternative assessment of proficiency in reading English; and No\nValid Score designates students who did not receive a valid test score because of absence from all or part of the test\nor because the test was administered under nonstandard conditions. 03/28/02MMiiddddllee--LLeevveell EEnngglliisshh LLaanngguuaaggee AArrttss\nA description of the performance levels and summary results for all general-education students and all students with\ndisabilities can be found in the Overview of the New York State Report Card.\nCounts of Students\nNot TestedTestedPercentages\nof Tested\nStudentsStudent Subgroup\nALT ELLNo\nValid\nScoreLevel\n1Level\n2Level\n3Level\n4 TotalLevel\n2-4Level\n3-4\nResults by Race/Ethnicity\nAmerican Indian/Alaskan\nNative0 0 0 00000 0 % 0 %\nBlack 0 0 0 00000 0 % 0 %\nHispanic 0 0 0 00000 0 % 0 %\nAsian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0 ssss1ss\nWhite 00 4 s s s s 9 0 s s\nTotal 0 0 4 5 28 45 13 91 95% 64%\nSmall Group Totals (s) 0 0 4 5 28 45 13 91 95% 64%\nResults by Gender\nFemale 0 0 1 1 8 27 10 46 98% 80%\nMale 0 0 3 4 20 18 3 45 91% 47%\nTotal 0 0 4 5 28 45 13 91 95% 64%\nResults by English Proficiency Status\nEnglish Proficient 0 0 4 5 28 45 13 91 95% 64%\nLimited English Proficient 0 0 0 00000 0 % 0 %\nTotal 0 0 4 5 28 45 13 91 95% 64%\nResults by Income Level\nEconomically\nDisadvantaged0 0 3 2 11 9 3 25 92% 48%\nNot Disadvantaged 0 0 1 3 17 36 10 66 95% 70%\nTotal 0 0 4 5 28 45 13 91 95% 64%\nResults by Migrant Status\nMigrant Family 0 0 0 00000 0 % 0 %\nNot Migrant Family 0 0 4 5 28 45 13 91 95% 64%\nTotal 0 0 4 5 28 45 13 91 95% 64%\nNote. ALT designates severely disabled students eligible for the New York State Alternate Assessment; ELL\ndesignates English language learners eligible for an alternative assessment of proficiency in reading English; and No\nValid Score designates students who did not receive a valid test score because of absence from all or part of the test\nor because the test was administered under nonstandard conditions. 03/28/02MMiiddddllee--LLeevveell MMaatthheemmaattiiccss\nA description of the performance levels and summary results for all general-education students and all students with\ndisabilities can be found in the Overview of the New York State Report Card.\nCounts of Students\nNot TestedTestedPercentages\nof Tested\nStudentsStudent Subgroup\nALT ELLNo\nValid\nScoreLevel\n1Level\n2Level\n3Level\n4 TotalLevel\n2-4Level\n3-4\nResults by Race/Ethnicity\nAmerican Indian/Alaskan\nNative0 0 0 00000 0 % 0 %\nBlack 0 0 0 00000 0 % 0 %\nHispanic 0 0 0 00000 0 % 0 %\nAsian or Pacific Islander 0 0 0 ssss1ss\nWhite 00 1 s s s s 9 3 s s\nTotal 0 0 1 3 46 42 3 94 97% 48%\nSmall Group Totals (s) 0 0 1 3 46 42 3 94 97% 48%\nResults by Gender\nFemale 0 0 0 1 24 21 1 47 98% 47%\nMale 0 0 1 2 22 21 2 47 96% 49%\nTotal 0 0 1 3 46 42 3 94 97% 48%\nResults by English Proficiency Status\nEnglish Proficient 0 0 1 3 46 42 3 94 97% 48%\nLimited English Proficient 0 0 0 00000 0 % 0 %\nTotal 0 0 1 3 46 42 3 94 97% 48%\nResults by Income Level\nEconomically\nDisadvantaged0 0 1 3 13 10 1 27 89% 41%\nNot Disadvantaged 0 0 0 0 33 32 2 67 100% 51%\nTotal 0 0 1 3 46 42 3 94 97% 48%\nResults by Migrant Status\nMigrant Family 0 0 0 00000 0 % 0 %\nNot Migrant Family 0 0 1 3 46 42 3 94 97% 48%\nTotal 0 0 1 3 46 42 3 94 97% 48%\nNote. ALT designates severely disabled students eligible for the New York State Alternate Assessment; ELL\ndesignates English language learners eligible for an alternative assessment of proficiency in reading English; and No\nValid Score designates students who did not receive a valid test score because of absence from all or part of the test\nor because the test was administered under nonstandard conditions. 03/28/0211999977 HHiigghh SScchhooooll CCoohhoorrtt\nGGeenneerraall--eedduuccaattiioonn ssttuuddeennttss wwhhoo ffiirrsstt eenntteerreedd nniinntthh ggrraaddee iinn 11999977 mmuusstt ssccoorree 5555 oorr hhiigghheerr oonn RReeggeennttss\nEEnngglliisshh aanndd mmaatthheemmaattiiccss eexxaammiinnaattiioonnss ttoo ggrraadduuaattee.. DDuurriinngg tthhee pphhaassee--iinn ooff tthhee RReeggeennttss eexxaammiinnaattiioonn\nggrraadduuaattiioonn rreeqquuiirreemmeennttss,, aallll ssttuuddeennttss ((wwiitthh llooccaall BBooaarrdd aapppprroovvaall)) mmaayy qquuaalliiffyy ffoorr aa llooccaall ddiipplloommaa bbyy\neeaarrnniinngg aa ssccoorree ooff 5555--6644 oonn tthhee rreeqquuiirreedd RReeggeennttss eexxaammiinnaattiioonnss;; aa ssccoorree ooff 6655 oorr hhiigghheerr iiss rreeqquuiirreedd ffoorr aa\nRReeggeennttss ddiipplloommaa.. SSttuuddeennttss wwiitthh ddiissaabbiilliittiieess aanndd cceerrttaaiinn SSeeccttiioonn 550044 ssttuuddeennttss mmaayy qquuaalliiffyy ffoorr aa llooccaall\nddiipplloommaa bbyy ppaassssiinngg RReeggeennttss ccoommppeetteennccyy tteessttss.. DDaattaa oonn tthhiiss ppaaggee aarree bbaasseedd oonn tthhee SSppeecciiaall RReeggeennttss\nEExxaammiinnaattiioonn RReeppoorrtt ffoorr tthhee 11999977 CCoohhoorrtt..\nPerformance on the English Graduation Assessment Requirement\nCount of Students by Score\nRegents Student SubgroupStudents in\nCohort 55-64 65-100 Passed RCTsPercent\nMeeting\nGraduation\nRequirement\nGeneral Education 82 s s s s\nStudents with Disabilities 2 s s s s\nTotal 84 7 76 1 100%\nResults by English Language Proficiency\nEnglish Proficient 84 7 76 1 100%\nLimited English Proficient 0 0 0 0\nTotal 84 7 76 1 100%\nPerformance on the Mathematics Graduation Assessment Requirement\nCount of Students by Score\nRegentsStudent SubgroupStudents in\nCohort 55-64 65-100 Passed RCTsPercent\nMeeting\nGraduation\nRequirement\nGeneral Education 82 s s s s\nStudents with Disabilities 2s s s s\nTotal 84 9 75 0 100%\nStudents Not Counted in the Cohort\nStudents Eliminated after October 1999\nStudent GroupFirst-\nTime\nNinth-\nGraders\nin Fall\n1997Students\nin Cohort\nin June\n2001Eligible for\nAlternate\nAssessmentELL\nStudents\nEntering\nUS at 17 or\noverTransferred\nto GED or\nAnother\nHigh\nSchoolDied or Left\nthe USA\nTotal 93 84 0 0 3 0"
} |
[
-0.11883839964866638,
0.04829868674278259,
-0.0025480559561401606,
-0.011011209338903427,
0.05195074528455734,
0.010291832499206066,
0.1154332384467125,
0.0007007909007370472,
-0.08592535555362701,
-0.07065396010875702,
0.0013317164266481996,
-0.035472381860017776,
0.018434155732393265,
-0.006737178191542625,
0.024402987211942673,
-0.029503243044018745,
-0.058138374239206314,
-0.05043954402208328,
-0.020765526220202446,
0.029036032035946846,
-0.06367600709199905,
0.024029914289712906,
0.0262432973831892,
-0.006037362851202488,
-0.011076544411480427,
-0.0014006864512339234,
-0.018619801849126816,
0.03277004510164261,
0.0028860096354037523,
-0.05694391578435898,
-0.04394163936376572,
0.025414075702428818,
0.08790954202413559,
-0.02499123103916645,
-0.03668315336108208,
0.0062413448467850685,
-0.06646791845560074,
-0.0671444833278656,
0.020564241334795952,
0.04238877445459366,
0.021880215033888817,
-0.04288247600197792,
-0.03437700495123863,
0.06146686151623726,
0.0656372681260109,
-0.0785202905535698,
0.029487011954188347,
0.010798297822475433,
0.06332410126924515,
-0.04508465901017189,
-0.01823394186794758,
-0.027721041813492775,
-0.0036737609189003706,
-0.03659451752901077,
0.054250262677669525,
-0.02085655927658081,
0.015034922398626804,
-0.060095224529504776,
0.016393909230828285,
-0.03323858231306076,
0.01750349812209606,
-0.0005952207720838487,
-0.16348379850387573,
0.08492093533277512,
-0.07583844661712646,
0.0161097701638937,
0.048382941633462906,
-0.007598146330565214,
-0.024985475465655327,
0.05949747934937477,
0.0658901110291481,
-0.03513742983341217,
0.0008843158720992506,
-0.11567969620227814,
0.049390342086553574,
0.03360460326075554,
0.055154237896203995,
0.026383694261312485,
0.053694359958171844,
0.038932498544454575,
0.0004393816343508661,
0.0180604699999094,
-0.09288253635168076,
-0.004073987249284983,
-0.0008234609267674387,
-0.04883106052875519,
-0.006677441764622927,
-0.023541681468486786,
-0.03813307359814644,
0.05245159938931465,
-0.042493823915719986,
-0.055899728089571,
0.08681583404541016,
-0.04896170645952225,
-0.08339672535657883,
-0.0457635223865509,
0.029042238369584084,
0.03465776517987251,
-0.08649188280105591,
0.4062184691429138,
0.03594949096441269,
0.018697189167141914,
0.0979783833026886,
-0.007865204475820065,
0.023714108392596245,
-0.05756505951285362,
-0.06109985336661339,
-0.006620500702410936,
0.007060033269226551,
0.021669859066605568,
-0.024405108764767647,
-0.033514637500047684,
0.00025015627034008503,
0.03170765936374664,
0.04407161846756935,
0.09463243186473846,
-0.035580113530159,
-0.0045343064703047276,
0.043714847415685654,
0.00020504710846580565,
-0.002858717693015933,
-0.024884076789021492,
0.0037606365513056517,
0.014041258953511715,
0.07781578600406647,
-0.1323145031929016,
0.0068764761090278625,
-7.2201250750405e-33,
0.007334581576287746,
0.002726183971390128,
0.012147537432610989,
-0.002440247917547822,
0.027932560071349144,
0.03927065059542656,
0.003743888111785054,
-0.04643532633781433,
-0.014492551796138287,
0.05360198765993118,
0.006590632256120443,
0.03664784133434296,
-0.023135676980018616,
0.03275369852781296,
0.07811082899570465,
0.009627518244087696,
0.007964123040437698,
0.0028742437716573477,
-0.0018807238666340709,
0.004691542126238346,
-0.012402275577187538,
-0.0008041393011808395,
-0.023038707673549652,
0.04297299310564995,
-0.028259985148906708,
-0.06694644689559937,
0.038539037108421326,
-0.07085712999105453,
0.020109260454773903,
0.001460324041545391,
0.0014639950823038816,
0.049912355840206146,
-0.02594558522105217,
0.0008223677286878228,
-0.03757276013493538,
-0.028740663081407547,
0.03337514027953148,
-0.07462829351425171,
-0.035983964800834656,
0.025680823251605034,
-0.050139084458351135,
0.010837196372449398,
-0.04243791848421097,
-0.002668545348569751,
-0.004916265141218901,
0.16647927463054657,
-0.0011541391722857952,
-0.004960660357028246,
-0.06482207775115967,
0.06976216286420822,
-0.0028182310052216053,
-0.02132517658174038,
-0.11613703519105911,
0.04333868995308876,
-0.0033509607892483473,
-0.020106570795178413,
0.016554009169340134,
-0.043971188366413116,
0.020619438961148262,
-0.009089959785342216,
0.009713641367852688,
0.039391469210386276,
-0.012487754225730896,
0.009350251406431198,
-0.08647788316011429,
-0.04851773753762245,
0.02447775937616825,
-0.008494960144162178,
0.023063570261001587,
-0.012638214975595474,
-0.05100997909903526,
0.03675990551710129,
0.03771744668483734,
0.030916057527065277,
-0.028798431158065796,
-0.01926880143582821,
-0.019831717014312744,
0.03583517670631409,
0.08063048869371414,
0.00649732630699873,
0.03545527532696724,
-0.041958946734666824,
0.006693818140774965,
-0.024078864604234695,
0.09502369910478592,
0.054634999483823776,
0.004220988135784864,
-0.05180729925632477,
0.01021517813205719,
-0.041098661720752716,
-0.03574559465050697,
0.06131820008158684,
-0.0030944310128688812,
0.08796171098947525,
0.006000818684697151,
4.4925641867161134e-33,
-0.07716735452413559,
0.01899317093193531,
-0.03573813661932945,
0.0887979194521904,
-0.01755509153008461,
-0.0027626880910247564,
0.037273939698934555,
0.09013677388429642,
-0.09250447154045105,
0.0680299699306488,
0.022390201687812805,
-0.045089662075042725,
0.030878892168402672,
0.044495198875665665,
-0.005799654871225357,
0.03523358702659607,
0.06968843936920166,
-0.004063474480062723,
-0.028155116364359856,
-0.03572935611009598,
-0.030507177114486694,
-0.03237851336598396,
-0.0024998304434120655,
0.034929435700178146,
-0.04148077219724655,
0.030205287039279938,
0.04858911409974098,
0.0632987916469574,
-0.021693143993616104,
0.036800533533096313,
0.03896567225456238,
-0.023581488057971,
-0.05063262954354286,
-0.05820295587182045,
0.04826247692108154,
0.08404397964477539,
0.03678114339709282,
-0.0007768925279378891,
0.024848245084285736,
-0.05051735043525696,
0.039668887853622437,
-0.010082785040140152,
0.002244437113404274,
0.11697717010974884,
-0.021961307153105736,
-0.005805923603475094,
-0.048092879354953766,
0.003788944333791733,
0.035172659903764725,
0.07729728519916534,
-0.09319712221622467,
-0.011992926709353924,
-0.021968109533190727,
0.04129430651664734,
-0.022958293557167053,
0.004160518292337656,
-0.0432187058031559,
0.0702132061123848,
-0.01905948668718338,
0.0004752702370751649,
0.005480603780597448,
0.026761434972286224,
-0.033612821251153946,
0.01346849836409092,
-0.022746674716472626,
0.03873894736170769,
-0.024523282423615456,
-0.03632815554738045,
-0.0017924589337781072,
-0.052569907158613205,
0.006689464673399925,
-0.025846485048532486,
-0.1348353624343872,
0.0011394252069294453,
-0.047169335186481476,
-0.05347497761249542,
-0.018427148461341858,
-0.007304163184016943,
-0.009657083079218864,
-0.037726134061813354,
-0.033999841660261154,
0.01841733604669571,
-0.008003143593668938,
-0.005512353032827377,
-0.03353199362754822,
-0.0201805979013443,
0.021665804088115692,
0.01075822301208973,
-0.05747472122311592,
0.01969684660434723,
-0.007240809965878725,
0.023037107661366463,
0.12023406475782394,
0.0032419958151876926,
0.010150063782930374,
-1.3403668397415913e-8,
-0.046724583953619,
0.04062063992023468,
-0.05561641603708267,
-0.0018853341462090611,
0.056323979049921036,
0.049638908356428146,
-0.04154156893491745,
0.0325038842856884,
0.02574923262000084,
-0.018780937418341637,
0.06920813769102097,
0.02598794549703598,
-0.02782331220805645,
0.05757509544491768,
0.09128093719482422,
-0.01532574463635683,
-0.10472093522548676,
-0.027585938572883606,
-0.016222817823290825,
-0.035399287939071655,
-0.010461363941431046,
-0.013999390415847301,
-0.0002939800324384123,
-0.08362972736358643,
0.007932317443192005,
0.006960071157664061,
-0.04422977939248085,
0.07475824654102325,
0.07440952211618423,
-0.04058071970939636,
-0.0018266832921653986,
0.01985001191496849,
0.014382191933691502,
0.020585300400853157,
0.02213379554450512,
-0.06437048316001892,
-0.06369856745004654,
0.01613914780318737,
0.009907381609082222,
-0.0055595203302800655,
-0.05467313155531883,
-0.0233115516602993,
0.07046928256750107,
0.006468005012720823,
-0.047700025141239166,
-0.0036470729392021894,
0.007837599143385887,
-0.004974569659680128,
-0.01241857185959816,
-0.07781214267015457,
-0.0009409073390997946,
-0.008002524264156818,
0.006034235469996929,
0.08434933423995972,
0.10730371624231339,
0.011427774094045162,
0.013366665691137314,
-0.012747352942824364,
0.061454374343156815,
0.03564131259918213,
0.1587459295988083,
0.12640950083732605,
0.04654904082417488,
-0.015717294067144394
] | {
"pdf_file": "UHB2FR7SVNEMVG7ILGEDDB27TN3D4VF6.pdf",
"text": " "
} |
[
0.013981521129608154,
0.002908149501308799,
-0.03570203483104706,
0.0013324909377843142,
0.03304625302553177,
0.07678622752428055,
-0.047211941331624985,
-0.04138217866420746,
-0.08084466308355331,
0.04289785400032997,
-0.000133953828481026,
0.11327967792749405,
0.008895397186279297,
-0.039804697036743164,
0.013877538964152336,
0.08490544557571411,
-0.055309560149908066,
0.011874507181346416,
-0.0058707501739263535,
0.07333594560623169,
0.008658487349748611,
0.10297714173793793,
-0.014117040671408176,
0.06389236450195312,
0.020676439628005028,
-0.01904773898422718,
-0.08581724762916565,
-0.07449190318584442,
-0.005437060724943876,
-0.004235516767948866,
0.09277208149433136,
0.05029568448662758,
0.017784716561436653,
0.00014005231787450612,
0.035983551293611526,
-0.024960147216916084,
0.053618770092725754,
0.014931599609553814,
-0.0281913373619318,
0.0032991436310112476,
-0.002591482363641262,
-0.08160749822854996,
-0.03816647455096245,
0.03615293279290199,
-0.01103953830897808,
-0.010035932064056396,
-0.0003147647075820714,
-0.06694640219211578,
0.04040035232901573,
0.053565654903650284,
0.0019720171112567186,
-0.07025090605020523,
-0.0350923016667366,
0.0436837300658226,
-0.00834908802062273,
0.01757587492465973,
-0.05723957717418671,
-0.07966738194227219,
0.021981442347168922,
-0.025727003812789917,
0.0024934373795986176,
-0.07371395826339722,
0.08741392195224762,
0.0027049414347857237,
-0.08473076671361923,
-0.03510017693042755,
0.06063401326537132,
-0.06259390711784363,
-0.07151999324560165,
-0.026079777628183365,
-0.013018149882555008,
-0.016916532069444656,
0.0000997814568108879,
0.04254616051912308,
0.022356461733579636,
0.006608157884329557,
0.012516197748482227,
0.06864628940820694,
0.1289106160402298,
-0.134150430560112,
-0.00732431560754776,
-0.014458396472036839,
-0.019040122628211975,
0.012518443167209625,
0.01927066594362259,
-0.03709184750914574,
-0.05231040343642235,
-0.06911465525627136,
0.04382370412349701,
-0.024760138243436813,
0.00391866359859705,
0.020755909383296967,
-0.018492337316274643,
-0.07688605785369873,
0.07489810883998871,
-0.05426281690597534,
-0.027184462174773216,
-0.06789007037878036,
-0.08058707416057587,
0.05946053937077522,
-0.08264730870723724,
0.012373300269246101,
0.016345767304301262,
-0.03586265444755554,
-0.06650074571371078,
-0.03102879226207733,
-0.004152027424424887,
0.04336538910865784,
0.055474866181612015,
0.0693100169301033,
0.009835988283157349,
-0.017365803942084312,
0.018608346581459045,
-0.0016363818431273103,
-0.045351263135671616,
0.052107591181993484,
-0.05405697971582413,
-0.02793632261455059,
0.08201248943805695,
0.004761094227433205,
0.03762160614132881,
0.04117877036333084,
-0.016696153208613396,
-0.0013817839790135622,
0.003258434124290943,
-0.0014705561334267259,
-0.005950515624135733,
1.99666476593499e-33,
-0.03687800467014313,
0.02057691290974617,
-0.01645362563431263,
0.03167688474059105,
0.02715608850121498,
-0.04451298713684082,
0.017823483794927597,
-0.10568675398826599,
-0.054215624928474426,
-0.07583697885274887,
0.014219086617231369,
0.07464250922203064,
0.07873392850160599,
0.020933078601956367,
-0.04624497890472412,
-0.0704018846154213,
-0.08338584750890732,
0.05623219907283783,
-0.0017193484818562865,
0.02404738962650299,
0.04993576183915138,
0.029330696910619736,
0.02504694275557995,
0.027402184903621674,
0.034046802669763565,
-0.07157623022794724,
-0.014621737413108349,
0.027013743296265602,
0.027628054842352867,
0.015645552426576614,
0.0067325737327337265,
0.01579587534070015,
-0.03609520196914673,
-0.0683058649301529,
0.021656924858689308,
-0.0420801006257534,
0.009839026257395744,
0.009347853250801563,
-0.04553372412919998,
-0.04749058187007904,
-0.030591607093811035,
0.06846782565116882,
0.030556637793779373,
0.00538510549813509,
0.03067590482532978,
-0.01480886247009039,
0.13029135763645172,
0.08034393936395645,
0.026072822511196136,
0.019769752398133278,
-0.009476684965193272,
0.009236372075974941,
-0.09308530390262604,
-0.05754763260483742,
-0.08111940324306488,
-0.09404344856739044,
-0.12835225462913513,
-0.0230819433927536,
-0.03664001449942589,
-0.09795217961072922,
0.05927722901105881,
-0.01943322829902172,
-0.03234456852078438,
0.01873753033578396,
-0.05761099234223366,
0.03900730982422829,
-0.04588954523205757,
0.007214671466499567,
0.038603510707616806,
0.014746126718819141,
0.089462511241436,
-0.04937436431646347,
-0.041603993624448776,
-0.035082846879959106,
-0.044935740530490875,
-0.0007281613652594388,
0.027441348880529404,
0.00471468735486269,
0.07515785098075867,
-0.09842124581336975,
0.03490191698074341,
-0.041195470839738846,
-0.028472332283854485,
0.03218052163720131,
0.10529282689094543,
-0.002238702494651079,
0.005846265237778425,
0.01325280498713255,
0.008311890065670013,
-0.028030676767230034,
0.026968905702233315,
-0.04453853517770767,
0.07979517430067062,
0.03197325021028519,
0.022198494523763657,
-4.469484089821687e-33,
-0.044867660850286484,
-0.03297761455178261,
0.016183268278837204,
-0.0010385260684415698,
0.0658326968550682,
-0.00951679702848196,
-0.033029377460479736,
-0.10211127996444702,
0.017862118780612946,
-0.17758341133594513,
0.04160993546247482,
0.01945069618523121,
-0.04733947291970253,
0.06397581845521927,
-0.01081469189375639,
0.0016325210453942418,
-0.03985961899161339,
0.027312174439430237,
0.014157579280436039,
-0.01886618137359619,
-0.019144002348184586,
0.11305471509695053,
0.022619523108005524,
0.09895440936088562,
0.020188920199871063,
0.08636961132287979,
-0.05989689752459526,
0.02211678959429264,
0.13135336339473724,
-0.038339611142873764,
-0.10564648360013962,
0.019103579223155975,
-0.06440305709838867,
0.033485010266304016,
0.0016455044969916344,
0.018387245014309883,
0.031308650970458984,
-0.11720231920480728,
-0.037642113864421844,
-0.02431611157953739,
0.12578938901424408,
-0.00756685808300972,
-0.027248114347457886,
0.02151780016720295,
0.01190344337373972,
-0.013902280479669571,
0.004235966596752405,
0.025769557803869247,
-0.09310928732156754,
-0.024530785158276558,
0.02298474870622158,
-0.035756900906562805,
0.039327725768089294,
-0.0012943102046847343,
-0.0470469631254673,
0.04734685644507408,
0.06173762306571007,
-0.0444900244474411,
0.03046506643295288,
-0.008063584566116333,
0.03294302150607109,
0.03814232721924782,
-0.06177083030343056,
-0.0024879961274564266,
0.023791391402482986,
-0.048806484788656235,
0.012690098956227303,
-0.033301956951618195,
-0.0024374518543481827,
0.051633499562740326,
0.0036622125189751387,
-0.11496435850858688,
-0.09567813575267792,
-0.05975083261728287,
0.030087199062108994,
-0.012350087985396385,
0.09191824495792389,
0.007112778257578611,
-0.08712886273860931,
0.014604081399738789,
-0.058942414820194244,
-0.03512595593929291,
-0.03972938284277916,
0.01311845425516367,
0.010412115603685379,
-0.0358518622815609,
0.02164129540324211,
-0.05525769293308258,
-0.000254041951848194,
0.13169653713703156,
-0.09646196663379669,
-0.05882495269179344,
-0.02880818210542202,
0.0710003599524498,
-0.04341176897287369,
-5.8592139140500876e-8,
0.0692865401506424,
0.024591125547885895,
-0.0626460462808609,
0.00972237903624773,
0.035458385944366455,
-0.05257739871740341,
-0.0349392369389534,
-0.012149582616984844,
0.004267639946192503,
0.05070457607507706,
0.11476073414087296,
0.12373021990060806,
0.12511785328388214,
-0.061420243233442307,
0.001931171165779233,
0.033752523362636566,
-0.041052963584661484,
0.04174260422587395,
-0.036889348179101944,
-0.016191041097044945,
-0.0011729431571438909,
-0.02278877981007099,
-0.006856461055576801,
0.0526786744594574,
-0.06521902978420258,
0.005676431581377983,
0.06907685846090317,
0.13473349809646606,
-0.0369664765894413,
-0.02533586136996746,
-0.052735336124897,
0.08067785203456879,
0.035317547619342804,
-0.007459443993866444,
-0.04138951376080513,
-0.07707180827856064,
0.057340532541275024,
0.01600925251841545,
0.017387622967362404,
-0.007479657884687185,
-0.019740881398320198,
0.0651029497385025,
-0.025076499208807945,
0.003720873035490513,
-0.0003991258272435516,
-0.028741760179400444,
-0.06273490190505981,
0.04125190153717995,
0.0025585652329027653,
-0.01008734479546547,
-0.01249738410115242,
0.030707139521837234,
0.046334244310855865,
0.02246543951332569,
0.013115588575601578,
0.05728502571582794,
-0.05013951659202576,
-0.00643225247040391,
-0.032596342265605927,
-0.013379093259572983,
0.09315090626478195,
-0.04268455505371094,
-0.0011824251851066947,
-0.021871725097298622
] | {
"pdf_file": "X3TAMFMWC3XPXVVNEVQVEKRWH7NDDESN.pdf",
"text": " \n \n \n \n \n \nMay\n 20, 2013 \n \n \n \nThe Honorable Bernard Sanders \nChairman, Subcommittee on Primary Health and Aging \nCommittee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions \n648 Dirksen Senate Office Building \nWashington, DC 20510 \n \nDear Chairman Sanders: \n \nOn behalf of the National Council on Aging, I am pleased to share NCOA's endorsement of the Older Americans \nAct Amendments of 2013 and commend you for this important first step to spur a bipartisan, bicameral \nreauthorization process for the 113th Congress. \n \nWe appreciate your continued leadership to advance a very thoughtful reauthorization package that continues \nto recognize that the Act still provides a strong foundation for the Aging Services Network and its partners to \nempower older adults to retain or improve their health and economic independence so they can remain in \ntheir own homes and communities. The most significant reason why the Act has not yet fully realized its true \npotential has been a lack of investment, which your bill addresses through several Sense of the Senate \nstatements. \n \nReauthorization of the OAA as increasing waves of Baby Boomers turn 65 is crucial to ensure that successes \nof the Act can be better leveraged, and innovation continues to be fostered to meet the needs of today's \nseniors. Proposals in your legislation that seize this opportunity include those which define economic security \nand significantly establish it as a goal of the Act, emphasize the delivery of evidence-based chronic disease \nself-management and falls prevention, promote senior center modernization, enhance the Senior Community \nServices Employment Program (SCSEP), and strengthen legal assistance and other elder justice provisions. \nTogether, these improvements can empower seniors and improve their health and economic security, bend \ndownward the long-term entitlements cost curve, and promote greater program efficiency and coordination. \n \nWe applaud your ongoing efforts to move OAA reauthorization forward, and we look forward to continuing to \nwork with you to promote a bipartisan process that remains true to the history of this important legislation. \n \nSincerely, \n \n \nJames P. Firman, Ed.D. \nPresident & CEO \n \n \n \n \nMay 20, 2013 \n \nThe Honorable Bernard Sanders \nUnited States Senate \n332 Dirksen Senate Office Building \nWashington, D.C. 20515 \n \nDear Senator Sanders, \n \nThe Strengthen Social Security Coalition is comprised of over 350 national and statewide organizations, \nincluding labor, womens, aging, disability, veterans and civil rights groups, whose goal is to strengthen \nSocial Security benefits for current and future beneficiaries. We are writing to express our unwavering \nsupport for the reauthorization of the Older Americans Act. This vital piece of legislation has created \noutlets of support for seniors to live in their communities with independence and dignity since 1965 \nwhen it was signed into law . \n \nThe Older Americans Act reauthorization directs the Bureau of Labor Statistics to create a more robust \nversion of the Consumer Price Index for the elderly (CPI-E) which is a more accurate measure of costs for \nseniors. As compared to the rest of the population, the average senior disproportionately spends a \nsubstantially larger portion of their income on health care, heating, cooling and other housing costs. \nAdjusting the Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA) to reflect inflation based on the CPI-E would afford a \nmore accurate Social Security benefit for thousands of seniors across America who currently only \nreceive a modest income. \n \nThis reauthorization would strengthen the Older Americans Act by reauthorizing all programs through FY \n2018 and requesting a 12 percent increase in appropriations from FY 2010 in order to address the needs \nof the baby boom generation. Updating the definitions of social and economic need to include outreach \nto LGBT individuals, veterans, and those with Alzheimer’s disease is essential to providing quality \nassistance to a diverse and growing senior population . The reauthorization also introduces efforts to \nprotect seniors from abuse and authorizes new grants to strengthen the environment of senior and \ncaregiver supports around the country- including the creation of the National Resource Center on Family \nCaregiving . \n \nThe reauthorization of the Older Americans Act is critical to ensuring the wellbeing of seniors in the \nUnited States who are committed to living out their days in the comfort of their own communities. Your \nefforts to stand up as a v oice for the aging population are celebrated among our coalition, and we thank \nyou for your strong leadership. \n Sincerely, \n \n \n Nancy Altman Eric Kingson \n Coalition Co ‐Chair Coalition Co ‐Chair \n \n National Association of Nutrition and Aging Services Programs \n1612 K Street, NW Suite 400 Washington, DC 20006 \n(202) 682-6899 (202) 223-2099 fax \nwww.nanasp.org \n \n \n \n \nMay 23, 2013 \n \nThe Honorable Bernard Sanders \nChairman, Subcommittee on Primary Health and Aging \nSenate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions \n428 Dirksen Senate Office Building \nU.S. Senate \nWashington, DC 20510 \n \nDear Chairman Sanders: \n \nThe National Association of Nutrition and Aging Services Programs (NANASP) is pleased to \nsupport S.___, the Older Americans Act (OAA) Amendments of 2013. Reauthorization of the \nOAA is vital to t\nhe health, well-being and independence of millions of seniors across the \ncountry. \n \nNANASP is a 1,100-member national nonpartisan, nonprofit, membership organization for \npersons ac\nross the country working to provide older adults healthful food and nutrition through \ncommunity-based services. Its members, as individuals, agencies and organizations, represent a \ndiverse coalition of those interested in senior nutrition programs. We strongly believe in these \nprograms and tha\nnk you for your support of them in the bill. \n \nWe feel that this bill is an excellent beginning to the work of reauthorizing the Older Americans \nAct and we look forward to continuing to work with you and the Subcommittee throughout the \nprocess. We appreciate your strong leadership and your dedication to seniors. \n \n \nSincerely, \n \n \nPaul Downey Robert B. Blancato \nPresident Executive Director \nNANASP NANASP \n \n \n \n May 21, 2013 \n Senator Bernard Sanders , Chair \nSubcommittee on Primary Health and Aging \nHealth, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee 428 Senate Dirksen Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Dear Chairman Sanders : \nLeadingAge wants to thank you for your leadership in the process of re -authorizing the Older \nAmericans Act (OAA). “The OAA Amendmen ts of 2013” will be a major catalyst towards the \npassage of a Re-authorized O lder Americans Act that will better serve older adults in our \ncommunities. LeadingAge members and affiliates touch the lives of 4 million individuals, families, employees \nand volunteers every day. The LeadingAge community ( www.LeadingAge.org\n) includes 6,000 \nnot-for-profit organizations in the United States, 3 9 state partners, hundreds of businesses, \nresearch partners, consumer organizations, foundations and a broad global network of aging services organizations that reach over 30 countries. The work of LeadingAge is focused on advocacy, education, and applied research. We promote adult day services, home health, hospice, community- based services, PACE, senior housing, assisted living residen ces, continuing care \ncommunities, nursing homes as well as technology solutions and person- centered practices that \nsupport the overall health and wellbeing of seniors, children, and those with special needs. \n This important legislation increases the focus on preventing elder abuse. It provides $5 million in funding for the Community Innovations for Aging in Place. This program over the ye ars \nimproved the collaboration between affordable senior housing and long- term services and \nsupports through Naturally Occurring Retirement Communities. LeadingAge is also pleased to \nsee that the bill helps Area Agencies on Aging and Aging and Disability Resource Centers continue to work closely with long-term services and support providers to improve care transitions for frail older adults. We applaud you for your commitment to older Americans, and we look forward to working with \nyou throughout this reauthorization process. Sincerely, \n \n William L. Minnix, Jr. \nPresident and CEO \n \n \n \nNational Association of State Long -Term Care Ombudsman Programs \n \nJoseph Rodrigues, NASOP President \nOffice of the State Long- Term Care Ombudsman \n1300 National Drive, Suite 200 \nSacramento, CA 95834 \nPhone (916) 419- 7510 FAX (916) 928- 2503 \nE-mail: jrodrigu@aging.ca.gov \nwww.nasop.org \n \nMay 22, 2013 \n \nThe Honorable Bernard Sanders, Chairman \nSenate Subcommittee on Primary Health and Aging \nUnited States Senate \n648 Dirksen Senate Office Building \nWashington, D.C. 20510 \n Dear Senator Sanders: \n The National Association of State Long- Term Care Ombudsman Programs (NASOP) is pleased to \nsupport your legislation, the Older Americans Act Amendments of 2013, which , among other things, \nwould improve the capacity of State Long- Term Care Ombudsman Programs to advocate for residents \nof long- term care facilities. \n As you are well aware, the Long- Term Care Ombudsman Program (LTCOP) identifies, investigates and \nresolves complaints made by or on behalf of residents of long- term care facilities that affect their health, \nsafety, welfare, or rights. Clarifying that residents have regular, timely, private and unimpeded access to LTCOP services strengthens residents’ rights to assistance from our Program. Improving the ability of the LTCOP to access all records pertaining to residents and clarifying that the LTCOP is a Health \nOversight Agency improves the LTCOP’s ability to investigate and resolve resident complaints. Removing organizational conflicts of interest and clarifying the relationship between the State Long-\nTerm Care Ombudsman and designated local entities ensures the independence of the LTCOP and strengthens the unity of statewide LTCOPs under the leadership of the State Long- Term Care \nOmbudsman. Restoring maintenance of effort provisions that protect federal and state funding for the \nProgram and increasing funding in Title VII will protect our ability to ensure regular and timely access to Ombudsman services. Authorizing Title IIIE National Family Caregiver Program funding to support the \nwork of the LTCOP in helping establish and assist family councils in long- term care facilities, identifies \nan unmet need to support family caregivers who continue to care for loved ones. \n We applaud your vision and efforts to improve the whole Act and especially your attention to the often-\nneglected l ong-term care system. NASOP enthusiastically supports your efforts and this important \nlegislation that protects the rights of all residents of long- term care facilities. We look forward to working \nwith you as the OAA reauthorization process moves ahead. \n Sincerely, \n \nJoseph Rodrigues \nPresident \n William Lamb, President \nSarah F. Wells, Executive Director \nPh: 202.332.2275 \nFax: 866.230.9789 \nwww.theconsumervoice.org \n \nMay 22, 2013 \n \nThe Honorable Bernie Sanders \nUnited States Senate \n332 Dirksen Senate Office Building \nWashing\nton, DC 20510 \n \nDear Senator Sanders, \n \nThe National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care (Consumer Voice) commends you for \nthe introduction of the Older Americans Act Amendments of 2013 . We support this critical \nlegislation, which is a much-needed first step towards reauthorizing essential Older Americans Act \nprograms, and are particularly pleased that it includes provisions to protect the rights and well-\nbeing of elders living in long-term care facilities, as well as those at home and in the community. \nAs you are aware, residents of long-term care facilities need effective advocacy in order to ensure \nthat they receive the quality of care and quality of life they deserve and are entitled to by law. The \npurpose of the\n Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program is to provide residents with access to such \nadvoca\ncy. The Older Americans Act Amendments of 2013 would strengthen and improve this \nprogram’s effectiveness in a number of important ways. This legislation would clarify both \norganiz\national and individual conflicts of interest within the program; clarify that the State \nOmbudsman is responsible for the management of the Office of the State Long-Term Care \nOmbudsman, including\n the office’s fiscal management; improve resident access to ombudsmen; \nand e\nnsure that State Ombudsmen receive ongoing training. It would also enhance the ability of \nthe Nati\nonal Ombudsman Resource Center to train and support both state and local ombudsmen by \nincreasing the Center’s funding. \nFurther\nmore, older adults receiving services and supports at home also deserve similar protections \nto ensure they are receiving high-quality care and a good quality of life. Yet these individuals have \nfew, if a\nny, rights and protections under current law. The Older Americans Act Amendments of \n2013 would guarantee home care consumers basic rights, including the right to safety, as well as \ninformation about costs, choice, and redress of grievances. The legislation would also advance the \ndevelopm\nent of ombudsman advocacy for home care consumers, who are frequently just as frail \nand vulnerable as nursing home residents. \n \nThe Consumer Voice thanks you and your staff for the hard work and dedication that led to the \nintroduction of the Older Americans Act Amendments of 2013 . We look forward to continuing to \nwork with your office in support of this vital bill during the coming months. \n \nSincere\nly, \n \nSara\nh Wells Robyn Grant \nExecutive Director Director of Public Policy & Advocacy \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \nThe National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care (formerly NCCNHR) is a 501(c) (3) nonprofit membership \norganization founded in 1975 by Elma L. Holder that advocates for quality care and quality of life for consumers in all \nlong-term-care settings. \n \n1001 Connecticut Avenue, NW • Suite 425 • Washington, DC 20036 \n \n \n \n \n \n \nMay 17, 2013 \n \nThe Honorable Bernie Sanders \n332 Dirksen Senate Office Building \nWashington, DC 20510 \n \nDear Senator Sanders: \n \nThe National Hispanic Council on Aging (NHCOA) – the leading national organization working to \nimpr\nove the lives of Hispanic older adults, their families, and caregivers – is proud to endorse the \nOlder Ame\nricans Act (OAA) Amendments of 2013 . We applaud you for your efforts to strengthen \nthe services and supports of the OAA and help make them available to all older adults. Hispanic \nseniors often struggle to access services that are available in their communities, but it is NHCOA’s \nhope that your amendments will help them get the assistance they need to live independently and in \nthe best possible health. \n \nThe population of older adults in the United States is growing quickly, and the OAA needs to reflect \nthis changing demographic. NHCOA strongly supports the increased funding requested for the \nvitally important meals, transportation, caregiver support, and employment training that the OAA \nprovides. F\nor many years, parts of the OAA have gone without funding increases. The increased \nfunding of the OAA Amendments of 2013 will allow service providers to meet the increased demand \ncreated by the growing population of older adults. \n \nNHCOA is also happy that the OAA Amendments of 2013 place a priority on the delivery of services \nand supports in a culturally and linguistically appropriate manner. In addition to growing larger, the \npopulation of older adults in the U.S. is also become more diverse. Currently, cultural and linguistic \nbarriers make it difficult for Hispanic older adults to access available services. The OAA \nAmendments of 2013 help break down those barriers. Prioritizing services that meet the unique \ncultural and linguistic needs of older adults is a tremendous step forward for the OAA. \n \nThank you for leadership and for your support of older adults. NHCOA looks forward to working \nwith you to further improve the lives of Hispanic older adults, their families, and caregivers. \n \nSincerely, \n \n \nYanira Cruz, Dr.PH \nPresident & CEO \n 1140 19th Street, NW ∙ Suite 550 ∙ Washington, DC ∙ 20036 ∙ wiserwomen.org \n \n May 22, 2013 \n \nThe Honorable Bernard Sanders \nChairman, Subcommittee on Primary Health and Aging \nCommittee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions \nU.S. Senate, 648 Dirksen Senate Office Building \nWashington, DC 20510 \n \n \nDear Chairman Sanders: \n \n It is with great pleasure that I write in support of the Older Americans Act Reauthorization legislation that \nyou are introducing this week. Please add the Women's Institute for a Secure Retirement (WISER) to your \nlist of supporters. I truly appreciate all of your efforts to strengthen and expand the programs under the \nOAA in both this Congress and in the 112th Congress. \n \n The importance of the Older Americans Act to millions of older adults should not be underestimated. The \nimpact and influence of the OAA is felt far and wide but intimately, too, in the meals that seniors eat every \nday, and in the protections and assistance that individuals receive from the many and varied programs and \nservices. \n \n The programs of WISER and the National Education and Resource Center on Women and Retirement \nPlanning are great examples of OAA programs that reach older adults in one of the most important ways \npossible: by protecting women from financial exploitation and poverty in their older years. As you know, \nthe center, administered by WISER, plays a critical role in addressing financial literacy and predatory \npractices. Predatory practices cost Americans $25 billion annually, robbing women, particularly elderly \nwomen, of precious assets and putting their home ownership at risk. The face of the victim is often a “cash \npoor, house rich” elderly widow, often African American, less-educated, and vulnerable. These are the \nindividuals that make up WISER’s audience and the people to whom WISER focuses its outreach. \n \n Being a target when you are at this vulnerable stage of your life has extreme consequences – being \nswindled out of your life savings is not only devastating but also life threatening. Older women are targeted \nnot only by strangers who are con artists, unscrupulous salespeople, contractors or others, but by those who \nare known to them and who have power over them such as family caregivers or someone with a power of \nattorney or other fiduciary obligation. WISER has partnered with the National Adult Protective Services \nAssociation to develop education materials, training programs, and outreach to educate, recognize, and \nprevent elder financial exploitation. \n \n In closing, let me again thank you for introducing this important piece of legislation that supports some of \nthe most effective and essential programs that we offer older Americans. Please let me know how I may be \nof assistance during the upcoming legislative process. \n \nSincerely, \n \n \n \n \nCindy Hounsell \nPresident \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \nMay 20, 2013 \n \nThe Honorable Bernard Sanders \nUnited States Senate \n332 Dirksen Senate Office Building \nWashington, D.C. 20515 \n \nDear Senator Sanders, \n \nWe are delighted to express our firm support for the reauthorization of the Older Americans Act. We are \nparticularly pleased with the CPI-E provision, as discussed below. Since 1965, this Act has helped millions \nof seniors live with independence and dignity within their own homes and communities . The Older \nAmericans Act created the primary organizing tool, the Administration on Aging, statewide Area \nAgencies on Aging, as well as programs like Meals on Wheels, and various volunteer services. These \nprograms have allowed thousands of older adults the flexibility and autonomy in deciding the type of \nenvironment they would like to live in during their later years. \n \nThis reauthorization addresses the shortfalls of seniors’ current economic security by directing the \nBureau of Labor Statistics to create a more robust version of the Consumer Price Index for the Elderly \n(CPI-E) within a 2 year window. Current benefits are very modest. The current CPI does not adequately \nreflect seniors’ disproportionally large housing and health care expenditures relative to other age \ngroups. As a consequence, benefits erode over time. This CPI-E would create a more accurate measure \nof the true cost of living seniors experience, which would help alleviate some financial strain as they age. \n \nThe Older Americans Act reauthorization is vital to ensuring the wellbeing of the growing senior \npopulation in the United States. The coordinated systems of services enacted by this reauthorization \nwould revitalize an essential piece of legislation in order to accommodate the needs of the growing \nsenior population. \n \nWe applaud your continued leadership on the Older Americans Act, and we are honored to endorse this \nlegislation. \n \n Sincerely, \n \n \n Nancy Altman Eric Kingson \n Coalition Co-Chair Coalition Co-Chair \n \n \n \nMay 2 2, 2013 \n The Honorable Bernard Sanders, Chairman \nSubcommittee on Primary Health and Aging \nSenate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee United States Senate \n428 Senate Dirksen Office Building Washington, DC 20510 Dear Chairman Sanders : \n The National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys wishes to express its support for your bill, the Older Americans Act Amendments of 2013. We thank you and your staff for the many hours that you have spent listening to stakeholders from across the country, establishing goals for this reauthorization, and drafting the bill that you plan to introduce this week. This is an important step in what should be an open, \nbipartisan, and bicameral process of reauthorizing this important law. In particular, we believ e that your continuing commitment to strengthen the quality of and access to legal \nservices for older adults is essential in this reauthorization. In addition, your provisions that recognize that the long-term care ombudsman program can be significantly i mproved by changes to the current law \nthat will not demand any additional resources are greatly appreciated . Moreover , your bill adds important \nlanguage consistent with the Elder Justice Act that will promote the fight against elder abuse, neglect, and \nexploitation on the federal, state, and local levels. \n NAELA is a professional association consisting of more than 4,300 attorneys who advocate for the rights of seniors and people with disabilities. Elder law attorneys are specialized and trained in a va riety of \nareas in the law that address an individual’s long- term care needs. We thank you for including our \nperspectives in the process and your steadfast commitment to providing much needed services to older adults, particularly those in the greatest eco nomic and social need. \n Our members see clients every day who have benefited or could benefit from OAA programs, and we are \nstrong supporters of its reauthorization in the 113\nth Congress. Please let us know what we can do to help \nyou in this ef fort. \n Sincerely, \n \n \n \nPeter G. Wacht, CAE Gregory S. French, CELA, CAP \nExecutive Director President \nMay 21, 2013 \n \nThe Jewish Federations of North America (JFNA) and the Association of Jewish \nFamily & Children’s Agencies (AJFCA) are pleased to endorse the Older Americans \nAct\n reauthorization bill. We urge Senators to support this legislation and reauthorize \nthe Older Americans Act with sufficient funding to meet the needs of seniors as soon as \npossible. \n \nJFNA represents 154 Jewish Federations & over 300 independent Jewish communities. \nThe Jewish Federations, collectively among the top 10 charities on the continent, \nprotects and enhances the well-being of Jews worldwide through the values of tikkun \nolam (repairing the world), tzedakah (charity and social justice) and Torah (Jewish \nlearning). AJFCA is the membership association for approximately 125 Jewish Family \nService agencies across the United States and Canada. Ranging in size from small \ndepartments of local Jewish Federations to some of the largest human services agencies \nin North America, our members provide vital services to clients of all ages, faiths and \neconomic backgrounds. They counsel families, feed the hungry, assist the elderly and \nprotect the vulnerable. We are united by the values of our Jewish tradition and work \ntogether toward our common goal of tikkun olam , repairing the world. \n \nOur network is comprised of experts in aging services for all seniors and we make up \nthe primary social service providers for Holocaust survivors in the United States. As \npeople who work with Holocaust survivors in their homes and in the community, we \nare reminded each day of the importance of enabling Holocaust survivors to remain \nsafely at home with their communities. The negative effects of isolation can be \ndevastating for survivors who also face financial challenges and fewer family members \nto help care for them. The ability to help provide that comfort and quality of life will be \nenhanced if the Responding to Urgent needs of Survivors of the Holocaust (RUSH) Act, \nwhi\nch is incorporated into this reauthorization bill, were to become law. \n \nWe also strongly support efforts to provide congregate and home-delivered meals that \nare culturally appropriate based on religious or ethnic requirement or health-related \nconcerns; funding of Title IV to help develop and carry out innovative demonstration \nprojects that advance and sustain healthy, efficient, and independent community-based \naging; strengthening the National Family Caregiver Support program; and funding for \nthe Senior Community Service Employment Program; among other important \ninitiatives supported by the Older Americans Act. \n \nJFN\nA and AJFCA look forward to cooperating with members of the Senate to move \nreauthorization of the Older Americans Act forward. For additional information, please \ncontact Shelley Rood at JFNA at shelley.rood@jewishfederations.org or (202) 736-\n5880. \n \nSincerely, \n \nAssociation of Jewish Family & Children’s Agencies \nThe Jewish Federations of North America \nMay 22, 2013 \nThe Honorable Bernie Sanders \nChairman, Subcommittee on Primary Health and Aging \nSenate Health, Education, Labor & Pensions Committee \n322 Dirksen Senate Office Building \nWashington, DC 20510 \nDear Chairman Sanders, \nOn behalf of the 158 Goodwill Industries agencies in the United States, I am writing in support of \nproposed changes to Title V of the Older Americans Act contained in the Older Americans Act \nAmendments Act of 2013. \nThe Older Americans Act (OAA) was the first federal -level legislation aimed at providing comprehensive \nservices for older adults. Since its original passage in 1964, tens of millions of seniors have benefited \nfrom the services provided by the OAA. Among those services are the employment services provided \nunder Title V -Community Service Senior Opportunities Act, commonly referred to as the Senior \nCommunity Service Employment Program (SCSEP). SCSEP is a program administered by the United States Department of Labor’s Employment and Training Administration that helps low-income people \nwho are 55 and older to return to or remain active in the workforce. The recession that began in 2008 seriously hurt the standard of living for many seniors, moving many from middle- income to low -income \nbrackets. At a time when our fragile eco nomy continues to struggle to recover from the recession, the \nimportance of the SCSEP program has never been greater. \nThe Older American Act Amendments of 2013 will require the Assistant Secretary for Aging and the \nSecretary of Labor to conduct a feasibili ty study and submit a report to Congress on the proposed transfer \nof the Senior Community Service Employment Program from the Department of Labor Employment and \nTraining Administration to the Health and Human Services Administration on Aging. While Goodwi ll \nsupports keeping the SCSEP program located within the Department of Labor, it also supports the study language that will be part of the proposed legislation. Goodwill believes such a study would provide \ngreater clarity on Title V’s interconnection with other Titles within OAA and provide Congress and the \nAdministration with more data on how significant SCSEP’s role is as a workforce development program \nfor our nation’s most at-risk seniors. \nWe appreciate your efforts on behalf of older Americans, especially in these difficult times. Please feel \nfree to contact Paul Seifert, Senior Public Policy Specialist at paul.seifert@goodwill.org or at (240) 333-\n5478. \nSincerely, \n \nJim Gibbons, President & CEO \nGoodwill Industries International The\tEldercare\tWorkforce\tAlliance \tis\ta\tproject\tof\tThe\tAdvocacy\tF und.\t\n\t\nThe\tpositions\tof\tthe\tEldercare\t Workforce \tAlliance\treflect\ta\tconsensus\t of\t75\tpercent\tor\tmore\tof\tits\tmembers, \t\t\nand\tdo\tnot\tnecessarily \trepresent \tthe\tposition\t of\tindividual \tAlliance\tmember\torganizations. \t\n \n\t\n\t\t\n\t\nMay\t22,\t2013\t\t\nThe\tHonorable\tBernie\tSanders,\tChairman\t\nSubcommittee\ton\tPrimar y\tHealth\t&\tAging\t\t\t\nCommittee\ton\tHealth,\tEducation,\tLabor\t&\tPensions\t\nU.S.\tSenate\t\n332\tDirksen\tBuilding\t\t\nWashington,\tD.C.\t\t20510\t\tDear\tChairman\tSanders,\t\tWe\tare\twriting\ton\tbehalf\tof\tthe\tEldercare\tW orkforce\tAlliance\t(EWA),\ta\tcoalition\tof\t28\tnational\t\norganizations—representing\tconsu mers,\tfamily\tcaregivers,\tthe\tdirect‐care\tworkforce,\tand\thealth\t\ncare\tprofessionals—joined\ttogether \tto\taddress\tthe\timmediate\tand \tfuture\tworkforce\tcrisis\tin\tcaring\t\nfor\tan\taging\tAmerica.\t\tWe\tapplau d\tyour\tefforts\tto\tmove\tforward\t with\treauthorization\tof\tthe\tOlder\t\nAmericans\tAct\t(OAA)\tin\tthe\t113\nth\tCongress.\t\tOAA\treauthorization\toffers\tan\timportant\topportunity\t\nto\thelp\tmodernize\tthe\taging\tservices\tnetwork\tand\tits\tprograms\ti n\torder\tto\tbuild\tan\teldercare\t\nworkforce\twith\tthe\tskills\tand\ttraining\tto\tmeet\tthe\t“whole\tperso n”\tneeds\tof\tolder\tadults\tfor\thealth\t\ncare\tand\tlong‐term \tservices\tand\tsupports\t(LTSS).\t\t\n\tEWA\tsupports\tthe \tOlder\t Americans\t Act\tAmendments \tof\t2013,\tparticularly\tits\tprovisions\tto\tsupport\t\nfamily\tcaregivers\tand\tstrengthen \tthe\teldercare\tworkforce.\t\tProv isions\tin\tyour\tlegislation\twhich\t\ncontribute\tto\tthese\timportant\tgo als\tinclude\tthose\tthat\tstrength en\tsupport\tfor\tfamily\tcaregivers\t\nthrough\tgrants\tto\tstates\tto\tcond uct\tassessments\tof\tfamily\tor\tin formal\tcaregiver\tneeds,\tenhance\tthe\t\nwork\tof\tFederal\tagencies\tto\timprove\tand\tdeve lop\tnew\tmodels\tfor\t care\tcoordination,\ttest\tmodels\t\nthat\tprovide\tdirect‐care\tworkers\twith\tadditional\ttraining\tfor\tnew\troles,\tand\tdirect\tthe\tAdministration\ton\tAging\tto\twork\tw ith\tother\tfederal\tagencies\tto\tidentify\tand\taddress\teldercare\t\nworkforce\tshortages.\t\t\tThe\tEldercare\tWorkforce\tAlliance\tl ooks\tforward\tto\tcontinued\teng agement\tin\tthe\tOAA\t\nreauthorization\tprocess.\t\tOur\tnation\tfaces\ta\tsevere\tand\tgrowing \tshortage\tof\teldercare\tproviders\t\nwith\tthe\tskills\tand\ttraining\tto\tmeet\tthe\tunique\thealth\tcare\tnee ds\tof\tolder\tadults.\t\tThe\tAlliance\tis\t\ncommitted\tto\tsupporting\tthe\treauthorization\tof\tthe\tOAA\tas\tit\tin vests\tin\tbuilding\tand\tmaintaining\tan\t\neldercare\tworkforce\tthat\tsupport s\twell‐coordinated,\thigh‐qualit y\tcare\tfor\tolder\tadults.\t\t\n\tSincerely,\t\t\t\n\t\nN a n c y \t L u n d e b j e r g , \t M P A \t\t\t\t\t\t\t \t \t M i c h èle\tJ.\tSaunders,\tDMD,\tMS,\tMPH \t\nE W A \t C o ‐ C o n v e n e r \t \t\t\t\t\tE W A \t C o ‐ C o n v e n e r \t2 1 2 ‐ 3 0 8 ‐ 1 4 1 4 \t \t\t\t\t\t\t2 1 0 ‐ 5 6 7 ‐ 7 4 3 9 \tnlundebjerg@americangeriatrics.org \t \t\t\t saunders@uthscsa.edu \t\n \n \n40 Fulton Street \n18th Floor \nNew York, NY 10038 \n212-822-3578 \nwww.eldercareworkforce.org The Elder Justice Coalition \nA National Advocacy Voice for Elder Justice in America \nJohn B. Breaux, Honorary Chair Robert B. Blancato, National Coordinator \n1612 K Street, NW Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20006 \nPhone: 202-789-0470 Fax: 202-223-2099 \nw\nww\n.elderjusticecoalition.com elderjustice@verizon.net \n \n \nMay 23, 2013 \n \nThe Honorable Bernard Sanders \nChairman, Subcommittee on Primary Health and Aging \nSenate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions \nU.S. Senate \n428 Dirksen Senate Office Building \nWashington, DC 20510 \n \nDear Chairman Sanders: \n \nThe Elder Justice Coalition (EJC) is pleased to support The Older Americans Act Amendments \nof 2013. We\n sincerely appreciate the efforts you and your staff have made to address the issue of \nelder abuse, neglect and exploitation in your bill. \n \nIn particular, we want to congratulate you on adding victims of elder abuse to the category of \nthose who are in “greatest social need.” This is very important because older adults who have \nbeen physically or financially abused or exploited are particularly vulnerable individuals in our \nsociety and they deserve the highest level of protection we can afford them. In addition, your bill \nhelps to make consistent the approach and definitions used in the Elder Justice Act, and your bill \nmakes perman\nent the National Resource Center for Women and Retirement and the National \nAdult Protective Services Resource Center. Further, your support for the State Home Care \nOmbudsman Program as well as your support for the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman \nProgr\nam is greatly appreciated. \n \nWe feel that this bill is an excellent beginning to the work of reauthorizing the Older Americans \nAct and we look forward to continuing to work with you and the Subcommittee throughout the \nproce\nss. We appreciate your strong leadership and your dedication to the prevention of elder \nabuse and to the causes of older Americans. \n \n \nSince\nrely, \n \n \n \nRobert B. Blancato \nNational Coordinator \nElder Justice Coalition \n \n \n \n \nMay 22 , 2013 \n The Honorable Bernie Sanders \nChair, Subcommittee on Primary Health and Aging Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions \n428 Senate Dirksen Office Building \nWashington, DC 20510 \n \n \nDear Senator Sanders: \n Thank you for your Older Americans Act reauthorization bill and its many improvements to help aging parents \ncaring for their adul t children with disabilities . The D evelopmental Disabilities , Autism and Family Support \nTask Force of the Consortium for Ci tizens with Disabilities (CCD) greatly appreciates the proposed \namendments to the National Family Caregiver Support program (NFCSP) and the Aging and Disability \nResource Centers (ARDCs) . \n \nThe NFCSP was the first federal program to recognize the needs of the nation’s family caregivers who provide \nthe vast majority of long -term services and supports. NFCSP not only funds respite, but individual counseling, \nsupport groups, and caregiver training f or family caregivers, primarily for those who are caring for the aging \npopulation. Unfortunately, the NFC SP currently is only available to caregivers of persons age 60 and over. \nYour bill would make the program available to the increasing number of Americ ans who need it by including \ncaregivers of their adult child ren (age 19 to 59) with disabilities . This needed improvement would not come a \nmoment too soon. \nThere are over 730,000 caregive rs of persons with intellectual and developmental disabil ities who are over the \nage of 60 and this number is projected to grow substantially with the aging of the baby boom generation. \nPeople with intellectual and developmental disabilities are also living longer due to medical advances. As \nparents of these individuals age, they will require more support to be able to continue providing care to their \nadult children and avoiding costly and unwanted institutional placement . \n The aging of the caregiver population is central to another welcome provision in the bill – the a ddition of \nADRCS assist ing aging caregivers and adults with disabilities with future planning . The lack of family future \nplanning often result s in inappropriate residential placements , loss of intended inheritance, and jeopardizes \naccess to needed services for adults with disabilities as they age. For instance, long waiting lists preclude \nappropriate community -based residential options for many individuals with lifelong disabilities . Providing future \nplanning services will provide immense relief to aging caregivers who frequently report that they are “afraid to \ndie.” \n More than at any other time, when M edicaid , Medicare, and Social Security are being severely threatened, \nhelping family caregivers to continue providing long-term se rvices and supports is good public policy . We look \nforward to working with you on the reauthorization of the Older Americans Act that will improve services for our \nnation’s caregivers. \n \n1825 K Street, NW, Suite 1200 • Washington, DC 20006 • PH 202- 783- 2229 • FAX 202- 783-8250 • Info@c- c-d.org • www.c -c-d.org \n \n \n \nCCD is a coalition of national disability organizations working together to advocate for national public policy \nthat ensures the self -determination, independence, empowerment, integration and inclusion of children and \nadults with disabilities in all aspects of society. \nFor more information, please contact any of the following Task Force Co -Chairs: \n \nKim Musheno , Association of University Centers on Disabilities kmusheno@aucd.org 301-588-8252 \nAnnie Acosta, The Arc acosta@thearc.org 202-783-2229 \nCindy Smith, National Disability Rights Network cindy.smith@ndrn.org 202-408-9514 \nPeggy Hathaway, National Association of Councils on \nDevelopmental Disabilities phathaway@nacdd.org 202-506-5813 \nJill Kagan, ARCH National Respite Network and Resource \nCenter jbkagan@verizon.net 703-256-2084 \n \nMay 21, 2013 \nThe Hono rable Bernard Sanders, Chairman \nRetirement and Aging Subcommittee \nHealth, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee \nUnited States Senate \nWashington, DC 20510 \n \nDear Chairman Sanders: \nOn behalf of the millions of members and supporters of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security \nand Medicare, I am writing to thank you for introducing the Older Americans Act Amendments of 2011, which reauthorizes the Older Americans Act (OAA). We share your hope that this legislation and other proposals to \nstrengthen the OAA will receive bipartisan support in Congress early in 2012. Older Americans Act programs \n– such as in -home assistance, home -delivered and congregate meals, respite for family caregivers, preventive \nhealth services, job training and placement, and legal services - benefit individuals and their families. By \nhelping seniors stay as independent as possible in their homes and communities, these programs also save federal and state government resources from being spent on sometimes unnecessary and often much more \nexpensive care in hospitals and nursing homes. We understand that your legislation improves the OAA \nprograms. In addition, your bill acknowledges that there is simply not enough money allocated for OAA programs to meet the needs of our growing elderly population. \nThe National Committee also applauds you for the provision in the Older Americans Act Amendments of 2011 which requires the Secretary of Labor to revise and improve the experimental price index for the elderly, \ncommonly referred to as the CPI -E, so that it can be considered as a replacement for the consumer price index \nthat is being used to adjust Social Security benefits for inflation. We believe that the CPI -E is based on a \nmarket basket of goods that more accurately reflects the spending patterns of the elderly and thus is a better index for the purpose of protecting seniors from the harmful effects of inflation. Revising and improving the \nexperim ental CPI -E is an essential first step in its adoption as the CPI of record for the Social Security \nprogram. \nThank you for your leadership on the Older Americans Act reauthorization. We look forward to working with \nyou to strengthen these important programs that go a long way toward ensuring economic security and \nindependence for older Americans and their family caregivers. \nSincerely, \nSherrie Dornberger \nSherrie Dornberger, RN, CDONA, CDP, GDCN, FACDONA \nExecutive Director NADONA/LTC \n11353 Reed Hartman Hwy., Suite 210 \nCincinnati, OH. 45241 \n \n \n \n \nMay 22, 2013 \n \nTo: Sophie Kasimow, Staff Director, HELP Subcommittee on Primary Health & Aging \n \nFrom: Lisa Pugh, Public Policy Coordinator, Wisconsin’s Disability Policy Partnership \n \nRe: Older Americans Act reauthorization bill \n \nI am writing to indicate our agency’s support for the Older Americans Act reauthorization bill to be introduced by Senator Sanders. Our agency had previously worked with Senator \nKohl’s office on many of these important issues. This bill includes an important fix to the \nNational Family Caregiver Support Program to include older relative caregivers of adults with disabilities. It also amends the core functions of ADRCs to include that they assist \naging caregivers and adults with disabilities with future planning. The language on \ncaregiver assessments will also be extremely helpful for aging caregivers of adults with \ndisabilities. \n Thank you for your work on this bill. We look forward to providing additional input and supporting its passage. \n cc: Senator Baldwin staff \n Billy Gendell, Senate HELP Committee \n \n \nAmerican \nMedical \nDirectors \nAssociation \n \n11000 Broken Land Parkway \nSuite 400 \nColumbia, MD 21044 -3532 \n \n(410) 740 -9743 \n Washington DC \n(301) 596 -5774 \n Toll Free \n(800) 876 -AMDA \n \nFax \n(410) 740- 4572 \n \nwww.amda.com \nwww.ltcmedicine.com \n \n \nPresident \nJonathan M. Evans , MD, CMD \nCharlottesville, VA \n \nPresident- Elect \nLeonard Gelman, MD, CMD \nBallston Spa, NY \n Vice President \nNaushira Pandya, MD, CMD \nSt. Lauderdale, FL \n Immediate Past President \nMatthew S. Wayne, MD, CMD \nShaker Heights, OH \n Secretary \nMilta O. Little, DO , CMD \nSt. Louis, MO \n Treasurer \nJ. Kenneth Brubaker, MD, CMD \nMount Joy, PA \n Chair, House of Delegates \nPaul Y. Takahashi, MD, CMD \nRochester, MN \n \n \nExecutive Director \nChristopher E. Laxton, CAE \nMay 21, 2013 \n \nThe Honorable Bernie Sanders, Chairman \nSubcommittee on Primary Health & Aging \nCommittee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions \nU.S. Senate \n332 Dirksen Building \nWashington, D.C. 20510 \n \nDear Chairman Sanders, \n AMDA- Dedicated to Long Term Care Medicine applauds your efforts to move \nforward with reauthorization of the Older Americans Act (OAA) in the 113\nth \nCongress. AMDA is the professional association of nursing home medical directors, nursing home attending physicians, and other professionals practicing in the post-acute and long term care continuum. We work to ensure excellence in patient care and to promote the delivery of quality post- acute and long term care medicine. \n AMDA supports the Older Americans Act Amendments of 2013, particularly its \nprovisions to strengthen the eldercare workforce and continue funding the long term care ombudsman program. Provisions in your legislation which contribute to these important goals include those that strengthen support for family and informal \ncaregivers through grants to states to conduct assessments of family or informal caregiver needs, test new innovative models of person and family- centered care that \nencourage well -coordinated, interdisciplinary team care, test models that provide \ndirect -care workers with additional training for new roles, and direct the \nAdministration on Aging to work with other federal agencies to identify and address eldercare workforce shortages. Also included is support for the Long Term Care \nOmbudsman Program, which addresses the many and varied problems facing long term care residents. State Ombudsmen play an important role in protecting nursing home residents, especially in promoting the development of citizen organizations and family residence councils. \n AMDA looks forward to continued engagement in the OAA reauthorization process. Our nation faces a severe and growing shortage of eldercare providers with the skills and training to meet the unique health care needs of older adults. AMDA is \ncommitted to supporting the reauthorization of the OAA as it invests in building and maintaining an eldercare workforce that supports well-coordinated, high quality care for older adults. \n \nSincerely, \n \n \nChristopher Laxton, CAE \nExecutive Director \n \n \nMay 21, 2013 The Honorable Bernie Sanders United States Senate \n332 Dirksen Building Washington, D.C. 20510 Dear Senator Sanders: \n We are writing to extend our most grateful thanks to you for writing and introducing the reauthorization of The Older Amer icans Act. \n Donated Dental Services (DDS) is a national initiative sponsored by our organization which is affiliated with the American Dental Association. We provide comprehensive pro bono dental care through a network of more than 15,000 volunteer dentists assisted by 3,200 participating laboratories. The program is overwhelmed by requests for assistance from individuals who require dental care to address their medical needs for conditions such as diabetes, cancers, cardiovascular diseases, renal dysfunc tion, autoimmune diseases, and mental health challenges. They \ncannot afford the dental care and have no insurance for it. Many more dentists are willing to participate in the DDS program and \nsimilar charitable service initiatives. However, they will not be effectively engaged without the social work infrastructure such project s \nrequire to match needy patients with available dental volunteers. The \nprovision in the Reauthorization of the Older Americans Act authorizing support for that purpose will mobili ze the dental profession’s service \npotential to produce significant treatment for many very vulnerable individuals. And because of the eligibility focus on needy elderly, disabled, and medically compromised individuals, many of whom are \nMedicare and/or Medicaid beneficiaries, this process will likely save more money than it costs, since costly medical complications will undoubtedly be prevented. Again, we re extremely appreciative of all your continuing efforts to improve services to our nation’s elderly and disabled members, and we’re eager to assist you in any way we can in helping to bring your efforts to fruition. \n Respectfully, \n \nBruce Vladeck, Ph.D. Larry Coffee, DDS \nBoard Member Founder and CEO \nMay 22, 2013 \n \nThe Honorable Bernie Sanders \nChairman \nPrimary Health and Aging Subcommittee \nSD- 648 Dirksen Office Building \nWashington, DC 20510 \n \n \nDear Chairman Sanders: \n \nOn behalf of our 156,000 members, we thank you for including important oral health \nprovisions in 2013 the Older Americans Act (OAA) reauthorization. We believe that these \nadditions are important for increasing access to needed oral health care for senior citizens. \nSec. 425 in the bill provides for a grant program that will support national dental programs to \ncoordinate medically recommended dental care for low income individuals. The dental care \nwill be provided by volunteer dentists at no cost to patients who have medical conditions – \nlike diabetes, cancer, autoimmune disease, kidney disease or need heart or joint \nreplacements or transplants. \nThis legislation is needed because Medicare, which does not cover routine dental services, \nwill not pay for the coordination of medically recommended dental care, thereby preventing \nmany underserved patients from getting needed care or compromising an existing chronic \ncondition. \nThis program will reduce Medicare and Medicaid costs. For example, kidney dialysis \npatients need to be able to consume enough protein to stabilize their condition. If a patient \ncannot eat properly, physicians have to insert a feeding tube. A 2001 study reported that the \nestimated one year cost of feeding a patient through a tube is $31,832. Under this bill, a \npatient in this condition would receive free oral health services from a volunteer dentist and \navoid the need of a feeding tube. \nIt has been estimated that the $2 million grant investment authorized in this bill will return \nroughly $13 million in medical ly-necessary, pro bono dental treatment and will help 5,000 \nMedicare and/or Medicaid beneficiaries. \nWe are also pleased that you have included dental expenses in Sec. 209 of the bill, which \nrequires the Secretary of Labor to revise the Experimental Price Index for the Elderly \ncommonly referred to as the CPI-E. Adults increasingly are keeping their teeth well into old \nage, placing increasing demands for services on the dental profession as well as incurring \nmore expense as consumers. Dental care is paid for much differently than most medical \ncare; therefore indexing dental expenditures will be helpful in understanding the impact of \nthese expenses on the elderly. We anticipate that the greater number of elderly individuals \nrequiring dental care will change the way dentistry is practiced in the future. Including dental May 22, 2013 \nPage 2 \nexpenses in the CPI-E will help the dental profession better understand the impact of those \nexpenditures. \nThank you again for including these oral health provisions in the Older American Act \nreauthorization. This is the first time in the history of the OAA that oral health care has been \nincluded. \nSincerely, \n \n \n \nRobert A. Faiella, D.M.D., M.M.Sc. \nPresident \n \n \nKathleen T. O’Loughlin, D.M.D., M.P.H. \nExecutive Director \n \n \n \n \n 1 \n \n \n \n \n \nMay 22, 2013 \n \nThe Honorable Bernie Sanders \nChair, Subcommittee on Primary Health and Aging \nCommittee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions \n428 Senate Dirksen Office Building \nWashington, DC 20510 \n \nDear Senator Sanders: \nOn behalf of The Arc of the United States, I wish to express my sincere appreciation for your \nOlder Americans Act reauthorization bill . This legislation offers significant improvements for \nour nation’s family caregivers who provide the vast majority of long term services and \nsupports. \nFor more than 60 years, The Arc has worked to ensure that people with intellectual and \ndevelopmental disabilities have the supports and services they need to live as independently \nand productively as possible. Through our network of over 700 state and local chapters and \n140,000 members, we have helped to create basic protections and opportunities for the more than 7 million people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in the U.S. \nMore than 65 million Americans provide care for a loved one who has a disability, is chronically ill, or is elderly and spend an average of 20 hours per week providing care. For \ncaregivers of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (I/DD) the levels of \nresponsibility are not only greater, but frequently lifelong. \nThere are approximately 2.9 million family caregivers of persons with I/DD in the U.S. \nAccording to The Arc’s Family and Individual Needs for Disability Supports (FINDS) survey, \nmost of these family caregivers provide more than 40 hours of care per week (including 40% \nwho provide more than 80 hours of care per week). As our society continues to depend on the active engagement of family caregivers for the s upport of individuals with I/DD, it is essential \nto meet the needs of those caregivers to continue providing care in the community instead of more costly and unwanted institutions. \nFamily caregivers of people with I/DD urgently need the services provided by the National \nFamily Caregiver Support program (NFCSP) created by the Older Americans Act . Your \nlegislation would finally make the NFCSP available to the majority of them who have been \nexcluded from the program – caregivers of persons with I/DD who are age 18 to 59. As a \nresult, many more families will be able to access essential respite, counseling, training, support group, and other services that help them to keep their loved ones at home . \nIn addition, the legislation would greatly help the growing number of aging caregivers to help \nplan for the future of their adult children with disabilities. Over 75% of adults with lifelong \n 2 \n disabilities live at home with family caregivers and more than a quarter live with aging \ncaregivers over 60 years of age. By expanding the role of Aging and Disability Resource \nCenters (ADRCs) to begin providing future planning services, many aging caregivers will be able to achieve the peace of mind that they deserve. P lanning for the future when aging \ncaregivers can no longer provide care involves specific legal and financial considerations – \nsuch as special needs trusts, guardianship, and less restrictive protections – as well as future \nresidential and lifestyle preferences. Access to these planning services will reduce the \nlikelihood of inappropriate residential placements, loss of intended inheritance, and limited access to needed services for their adult children with disabilities. \nHelping family caregivers to continue providing long -term services and supports is a matter of \nethical and fiscal responsibility . We look forward to working with you on the reauthorization \nof the Older Americans Act that will improve services for our nation’s caregivers. \n Sincerely, \n \nAnnie Acosta \nPolicy Advocate \nThe Arc of the United States \n \n \n \n \nMay 23, 2013 \n \n \n \nDear Chairman Sanders: \n The American Geriatrics Society (AGS) supports the Older Americans Act Amendments of 2013. AGS is a national \nnon‐profit organization comprised of over 6,000 health professionals, including physicians, nurses, researchers, \nmedical educators, pharmacists, physician assistants, social workers, health care administrators, and others who \nspecialize in geriatrics. We are the nation's largest multi‐disciplinary health professional organization dedicated to \nimproving the health, independence and quality of life of older people through initiatives in clinical practice, \nresearch and professional and public education. \n \nWe very much appreciate your efforts to move forward with reauthorization of the Older Americans Act (OAA) in \nthe 113th Congress. Reauthorization of the OAA provides an important opportunity to modernize the aging \nservices network and its programs in order to build a health professional workforce with the skills and training to \nmeet the health and long‐term care services and supports (LTSS) needs of older adults. As you know, our nation \nalready faces a severe and growing shortage of healthcare professionals with the training and skills to meet the \nunique health care needs of older adults. \n \nWe are pleased to see provisions in the Older Americans Act Amendments of 2013 to address workforce \nshortages and support family caregivers. Several provisions in your legislation contribute to these important \ngoals, including requiring the Administration on Aging to work with other federal agencies to identify and address \nworkforce shortages in the field of aging. The bill also tests new innovative models of person and family‐centered \ncare that encourage well‐coordinated, interdisciplinary team care. Additional components provide grants to \nstates to conduct assessments of family or informal caregiver needs as well as the testing of models that provide \ndirect care workers with further training for new roles. \n \nChairman Sanders, AGS appreciates your leadership on this important legislation and looks forward to continued \nengagement in the OAA reauthorization process. Should you have any additional questions, please contact \nAlanna Goldstein, Assistant Director of Public Affairs and Advocacy, at agoldstein@americangeriatrics.org or \n212‐308‐1414. \n \nSincerely, \n \nCathy Alessi, MD, AGSF Jennie Chin Hansen, RN, MS, FAAN \nPresident Chief Executive Officer \n The Honorable Bernie Sanders, Chairman \nSubcommittee on Primary Health & Aging \nCommittee on Health, Education, Labor & Pensions \nU.S. Senate \n332 Dirksen Building \nWashington, D.C. 20510 \n \n"
} |
[
-0.11883839964866638,
0.04829868674278259,
-0.0025480559561401606,
-0.011011209338903427,
0.05195074528455734,
0.010291832499206066,
0.1154332384467125,
0.0007007909007370472,
-0.08592535555362701,
-0.07065396010875702,
0.0013317164266481996,
-0.035472381860017776,
0.018434155732393265,
-0.006737178191542625,
0.024402987211942673,
-0.029503243044018745,
-0.058138374239206314,
-0.05043954402208328,
-0.020765526220202446,
0.029036032035946846,
-0.06367600709199905,
0.024029914289712906,
0.0262432973831892,
-0.006037362851202488,
-0.011076544411480427,
-0.0014006864512339234,
-0.018619801849126816,
0.03277004510164261,
0.0028860096354037523,
-0.05694391578435898,
-0.04394163936376572,
0.025414075702428818,
0.08790954202413559,
-0.02499123103916645,
-0.03668315336108208,
0.0062413448467850685,
-0.06646791845560074,
-0.0671444833278656,
0.020564241334795952,
0.04238877445459366,
0.021880215033888817,
-0.04288247600197792,
-0.03437700495123863,
0.06146686151623726,
0.0656372681260109,
-0.0785202905535698,
0.029487011954188347,
0.010798297822475433,
0.06332410126924515,
-0.04508465901017189,
-0.01823394186794758,
-0.027721041813492775,
-0.0036737609189003706,
-0.03659451752901077,
0.054250262677669525,
-0.02085655927658081,
0.015034922398626804,
-0.060095224529504776,
0.016393909230828285,
-0.03323858231306076,
0.01750349812209606,
-0.0005952207720838487,
-0.16348379850387573,
0.08492093533277512,
-0.07583844661712646,
0.0161097701638937,
0.048382941633462906,
-0.007598146330565214,
-0.024985475465655327,
0.05949747934937477,
0.0658901110291481,
-0.03513742983341217,
0.0008843158720992506,
-0.11567969620227814,
0.049390342086553574,
0.03360460326075554,
0.055154237896203995,
0.026383694261312485,
0.053694359958171844,
0.038932498544454575,
0.0004393816343508661,
0.0180604699999094,
-0.09288253635168076,
-0.004073987249284983,
-0.0008234609267674387,
-0.04883106052875519,
-0.006677441764622927,
-0.023541681468486786,
-0.03813307359814644,
0.05245159938931465,
-0.042493823915719986,
-0.055899728089571,
0.08681583404541016,
-0.04896170645952225,
-0.08339672535657883,
-0.0457635223865509,
0.029042238369584084,
0.03465776517987251,
-0.08649188280105591,
0.4062184691429138,
0.03594949096441269,
0.018697189167141914,
0.0979783833026886,
-0.007865204475820065,
0.023714108392596245,
-0.05756505951285362,
-0.06109985336661339,
-0.006620500702410936,
0.007060033269226551,
0.021669859066605568,
-0.024405108764767647,
-0.033514637500047684,
0.00025015627034008503,
0.03170765936374664,
0.04407161846756935,
0.09463243186473846,
-0.035580113530159,
-0.0045343064703047276,
0.043714847415685654,
0.00020504710846580565,
-0.002858717693015933,
-0.024884076789021492,
0.0037606365513056517,
0.014041258953511715,
0.07781578600406647,
-0.1323145031929016,
0.0068764761090278625,
-7.2201250750405e-33,
0.007334581576287746,
0.002726183971390128,
0.012147537432610989,
-0.002440247917547822,
0.027932560071349144,
0.03927065059542656,
0.003743888111785054,
-0.04643532633781433,
-0.014492551796138287,
0.05360198765993118,
0.006590632256120443,
0.03664784133434296,
-0.023135676980018616,
0.03275369852781296,
0.07811082899570465,
0.009627518244087696,
0.007964123040437698,
0.0028742437716573477,
-0.0018807238666340709,
0.004691542126238346,
-0.012402275577187538,
-0.0008041393011808395,
-0.023038707673549652,
0.04297299310564995,
-0.028259985148906708,
-0.06694644689559937,
0.038539037108421326,
-0.07085712999105453,
0.020109260454773903,
0.001460324041545391,
0.0014639950823038816,
0.049912355840206146,
-0.02594558522105217,
0.0008223677286878228,
-0.03757276013493538,
-0.028740663081407547,
0.03337514027953148,
-0.07462829351425171,
-0.035983964800834656,
0.025680823251605034,
-0.050139084458351135,
0.010837196372449398,
-0.04243791848421097,
-0.002668545348569751,
-0.004916265141218901,
0.16647927463054657,
-0.0011541391722857952,
-0.004960660357028246,
-0.06482207775115967,
0.06976216286420822,
-0.0028182310052216053,
-0.02132517658174038,
-0.11613703519105911,
0.04333868995308876,
-0.0033509607892483473,
-0.020106570795178413,
0.016554009169340134,
-0.043971188366413116,
0.020619438961148262,
-0.009089959785342216,
0.009713641367852688,
0.039391469210386276,
-0.012487754225730896,
0.009350251406431198,
-0.08647788316011429,
-0.04851773753762245,
0.02447775937616825,
-0.008494960144162178,
0.023063570261001587,
-0.012638214975595474,
-0.05100997909903526,
0.03675990551710129,
0.03771744668483734,
0.030916057527065277,
-0.028798431158065796,
-0.01926880143582821,
-0.019831717014312744,
0.03583517670631409,
0.08063048869371414,
0.00649732630699873,
0.03545527532696724,
-0.041958946734666824,
0.006693818140774965,
-0.024078864604234695,
0.09502369910478592,
0.054634999483823776,
0.004220988135784864,
-0.05180729925632477,
0.01021517813205719,
-0.041098661720752716,
-0.03574559465050697,
0.06131820008158684,
-0.0030944310128688812,
0.08796171098947525,
0.006000818684697151,
4.4925641867161134e-33,
-0.07716735452413559,
0.01899317093193531,
-0.03573813661932945,
0.0887979194521904,
-0.01755509153008461,
-0.0027626880910247564,
0.037273939698934555,
0.09013677388429642,
-0.09250447154045105,
0.0680299699306488,
0.022390201687812805,
-0.045089662075042725,
0.030878892168402672,
0.044495198875665665,
-0.005799654871225357,
0.03523358702659607,
0.06968843936920166,
-0.004063474480062723,
-0.028155116364359856,
-0.03572935611009598,
-0.030507177114486694,
-0.03237851336598396,
-0.0024998304434120655,
0.034929435700178146,
-0.04148077219724655,
0.030205287039279938,
0.04858911409974098,
0.0632987916469574,
-0.021693143993616104,
0.036800533533096313,
0.03896567225456238,
-0.023581488057971,
-0.05063262954354286,
-0.05820295587182045,
0.04826247692108154,
0.08404397964477539,
0.03678114339709282,
-0.0007768925279378891,
0.024848245084285736,
-0.05051735043525696,
0.039668887853622437,
-0.010082785040140152,
0.002244437113404274,
0.11697717010974884,
-0.021961307153105736,
-0.005805923603475094,
-0.048092879354953766,
0.003788944333791733,
0.035172659903764725,
0.07729728519916534,
-0.09319712221622467,
-0.011992926709353924,
-0.021968109533190727,
0.04129430651664734,
-0.022958293557167053,
0.004160518292337656,
-0.0432187058031559,
0.0702132061123848,
-0.01905948668718338,
0.0004752702370751649,
0.005480603780597448,
0.026761434972286224,
-0.033612821251153946,
0.01346849836409092,
-0.022746674716472626,
0.03873894736170769,
-0.024523282423615456,
-0.03632815554738045,
-0.0017924589337781072,
-0.052569907158613205,
0.006689464673399925,
-0.025846485048532486,
-0.1348353624343872,
0.0011394252069294453,
-0.047169335186481476,
-0.05347497761249542,
-0.018427148461341858,
-0.007304163184016943,
-0.009657083079218864,
-0.037726134061813354,
-0.033999841660261154,
0.01841733604669571,
-0.008003143593668938,
-0.005512353032827377,
-0.03353199362754822,
-0.0201805979013443,
0.021665804088115692,
0.01075822301208973,
-0.05747472122311592,
0.01969684660434723,
-0.007240809965878725,
0.023037107661366463,
0.12023406475782394,
0.0032419958151876926,
0.010150063782930374,
-1.3403668397415913e-8,
-0.046724583953619,
0.04062063992023468,
-0.05561641603708267,
-0.0018853341462090611,
0.056323979049921036,
0.049638908356428146,
-0.04154156893491745,
0.0325038842856884,
0.02574923262000084,
-0.018780937418341637,
0.06920813769102097,
0.02598794549703598,
-0.02782331220805645,
0.05757509544491768,
0.09128093719482422,
-0.01532574463635683,
-0.10472093522548676,
-0.027585938572883606,
-0.016222817823290825,
-0.035399287939071655,
-0.010461363941431046,
-0.013999390415847301,
-0.0002939800324384123,
-0.08362972736358643,
0.007932317443192005,
0.006960071157664061,
-0.04422977939248085,
0.07475824654102325,
0.07440952211618423,
-0.04058071970939636,
-0.0018266832921653986,
0.01985001191496849,
0.014382191933691502,
0.020585300400853157,
0.02213379554450512,
-0.06437048316001892,
-0.06369856745004654,
0.01613914780318737,
0.009907381609082222,
-0.0055595203302800655,
-0.05467313155531883,
-0.0233115516602993,
0.07046928256750107,
0.006468005012720823,
-0.047700025141239166,
-0.0036470729392021894,
0.007837599143385887,
-0.004974569659680128,
-0.01241857185959816,
-0.07781214267015457,
-0.0009409073390997946,
-0.008002524264156818,
0.006034235469996929,
0.08434933423995972,
0.10730371624231339,
0.011427774094045162,
0.013366665691137314,
-0.012747352942824364,
0.061454374343156815,
0.03564131259918213,
0.1587459295988083,
0.12640950083732605,
0.04654904082417488,
-0.015717294067144394
] | {
"pdf_file": "OEJKXSDUJIM5XWYEYLA2NWL3K4UI5IZR.pdf",
"text": " "
} |
[
-0.03292393684387207,
0.009449680335819721,
-0.06126315891742706,
-0.069194495677948,
0.03439638018608093,
-0.008478744886815548,
0.03352506458759308,
0.07093381881713867,
0.0027418641839176416,
0.019292689859867096,
0.06956521421670914,
0.048218101263046265,
0.07523705065250397,
-0.04399311542510986,
-0.04600720852613449,
0.03834681957960129,
0.04774659499526024,
-0.011577381752431393,
-0.06223500147461891,
0.004357160534709692,
0.07114408165216446,
0.013827593065798283,
0.05124935880303383,
-0.0005974050145596266,
0.024071499705314636,
0.0662086233496666,
-0.08355708420276642,
-0.04610464349389076,
-0.012999091297388077,
-0.02281840890645981,
0.003629326820373535,
0.04300650581717491,
-0.04941263794898987,
0.024133872240781784,
0.048548270016908646,
-0.045815758407115936,
-0.046135857701301575,
-0.004163770936429501,
0.09150610119104385,
-0.008025703020393848,
0.05556443706154823,
-0.07026594877243042,
-0.01944492943584919,
-0.010409591719508171,
-0.08820943534374237,
-0.04271582141518593,
0.0057425652630627155,
0.09496188163757324,
-0.03295891359448433,
-0.0013659591786563396,
0.030644048005342484,
-0.04151260107755661,
0.020542198792099953,
0.06755267828702927,
-0.06995254009962082,
-0.053061630576848984,
0.02339993789792061,
0.025890523567795753,
0.025868134573101997,
0.07029466331005096,
0.033253882080316544,
0.06145418807864189,
-0.011503433808684349,
0.014102762565016747,
0.01777956448495388,
0.023701893165707588,
0.01672169752418995,
-0.08995255082845688,
0.004264250863343477,
0.017599361017346382,
0.10705063492059708,
0.023833047598600388,
-0.03257158771157265,
0.03272908926010132,
-0.02024918980896473,
0.005952984560281038,
0.019735801964998245,
0.04313841089606285,
0.02369667962193489,
-0.045059312134981155,
-0.015090391971170902,
-0.037123557180166245,
0.041935358196496964,
-0.07099900394678116,
0.010450618341565132,
-0.07001493126153946,
-0.09092673659324646,
0.05592943727970123,
0.03653945401310921,
-0.051020555198192596,
0.022797413170337677,
-0.024743830785155296,
0.014854558743536472,
-0.06412054598331451,
0.0002742931537795812,
-0.014267907477915287,
-0.04205266013741493,
0.06746175140142441,
-0.038975853472948074,
0.04593602567911148,
-0.02079596184194088,
-0.01864861138164997,
-0.05908752605319023,
-0.07137275487184525,
0.06100568175315857,
-0.024703247472643852,
0.025205152109265327,
0.11263846606016159,
-0.03767428174614906,
-0.03401205316185951,
-0.030207820236682892,
0.019849184900522232,
0.07594714313745499,
-0.008696858771145344,
0.03579128161072731,
0.015955964103341103,
0.03922836109995842,
0.10827869921922684,
-0.03106207214295864,
-0.12724199891090393,
0.03387422487139702,
0.041965074837207794,
-0.08454428613185883,
-0.024481026455760002,
0.03481621295213699,
-0.04969087988138199,
-0.04521537572145462,
2.57388300171162e-33,
0.02070404589176178,
0.014172782190144062,
-0.00493162777274847,
-0.043680913746356964,
0.058623701333999634,
0.00971942488104105,
0.037515074014663696,
0.02280631847679615,
0.03749134764075279,
0.06113118678331375,
0.006126479711383581,
-0.0595419779419899,
0.0649004802107811,
-0.028831837698817253,
-0.021424658596515656,
-0.015010912902653217,
0.017878595739603043,
-0.022201061248779297,
-0.06216141954064369,
-0.02786250226199627,
0.1134490817785263,
-0.05974199250340462,
-0.0070565855130553246,
0.07818635553121567,
-0.1648603230714798,
-0.019135981798171997,
-0.08933372795581818,
0.01651858165860176,
-0.026092812418937683,
-0.019207635894417763,
-0.0007667772006243467,
0.04911741986870766,
0.1279432475566864,
0.06105738505721092,
0.07165468484163284,
-0.03444070369005203,
0.059417348355054855,
0.016039982438087463,
-0.010920501314103603,
-0.029052162542939186,
0.06624927371740341,
0.14098483324050903,
0.025651326403021812,
0.014773013070225716,
-0.051500312983989716,
-0.03642570227384567,
-0.06492991745471954,
0.007469691801816225,
0.011504021473228931,
0.03572385758161545,
0.06289731711149216,
-0.015718258917331696,
0.06266120076179504,
-0.01348791178315878,
-0.03852708265185356,
0.05205056816339493,
-0.09523361176252365,
0.03202483057975769,
0.0078410804271698,
0.11666597425937653,
0.03072291798889637,
0.06445010006427765,
-0.05986790731549263,
0.023895811289548874,
-0.066541388630867,
-0.08268372714519501,
-0.03574332594871521,
0.023278111591935158,
-0.07291746139526367,
0.008054439909756184,
0.033083900809288025,
0.10334742069244385,
-0.0048826104030013084,
-0.02236705832183361,
0.026799246668815613,
-0.0765203982591629,
0.03579942137002945,
-0.015231987461447716,
-0.025895126163959503,
-0.05941895768046379,
-0.07664263993501663,
-0.11927438527345657,
0.06095437332987785,
-0.006292073521763086,
-0.01986720599234104,
-0.0028431140817701817,
-0.04737856611609459,
-0.060414981096982956,
0.010150446556508541,
0.04020213708281517,
-0.017227331176400185,
-0.027232008054852486,
-0.06766834855079651,
-0.0204818993806839,
-0.0018575545400381088,
-4.158282613359041e-33,
-0.07855457067489624,
-0.00566195510327816,
0.03218812495470047,
0.05758077651262283,
0.05662217363715172,
0.002467833925038576,
0.03447163850069046,
-0.05488235503435135,
-0.08191622048616409,
-0.1195320412516594,
-0.021743787452578545,
0.039334118366241455,
0.09487960487604141,
0.09154625236988068,
-0.010441936552524567,
0.02352728135883808,
0.005657757632434368,
0.046034201979637146,
-0.042558372020721436,
0.007721185218542814,
0.01971874013543129,
0.06336420029401779,
-0.08734053373336792,
0.002525507239624858,
-0.031233763322234154,
-0.07694888114929199,
0.032932378351688385,
0.010726451873779297,
0.03958505764603615,
0.07283898442983627,
-0.000958078249823302,
0.03267837315797806,
0.012441320344805717,
0.039610449224710464,
-0.03460245579481125,
-0.010761714540421963,
0.11070958524942398,
-0.02393726445734501,
-0.01471445057541132,
0.012456436641514301,
0.01007145643234253,
-0.005005568265914917,
-0.047044336795806885,
0.07541275769472122,
-0.028789272531867027,
0.0739135816693306,
0.03647681698203087,
0.04371633753180504,
-0.003572484478354454,
0.021032867953181267,
-0.07205594331026077,
0.0033081979490816593,
0.03752250596880913,
0.10636565834283829,
0.055479083210229874,
-0.044269029051065445,
-0.03521931171417236,
-0.039623815566301346,
-0.04013178497552872,
-0.04939458146691322,
0.0016976360930129886,
0.12093258649110794,
-0.04616281017661095,
-0.08920815587043762,
0.10715596377849579,
-0.032693423330783844,
-0.0863552987575531,
-0.01330158393830061,
0.020733971148729324,
-0.00977721530944109,
0.05417552590370178,
-0.11645068973302841,
-0.03805439546704292,
-0.04943517595529556,
-0.040142275393009186,
-0.03340139612555504,
0.0358828529715538,
-0.023596465587615967,
-0.10388047248125076,
-0.042340025305747986,
-0.013500253669917583,
-0.06965739279985428,
-0.00801111850887537,
-0.03215020149946213,
0.011146120727062225,
0.10056006163358688,
0.05910855531692505,
-0.09201309829950333,
-0.02696300856769085,
0.08205275237560272,
0.002817389788106084,
-0.03864660486578941,
0.0384814478456974,
0.009231430478394032,
0.0017885529669001698,
-5.9507733851660305e-8,
-0.02344762347638607,
0.06815717369318008,
-0.04122394695878029,
0.0373091846704483,
0.06441605091094971,
0.07619063556194305,
0.03631582856178284,
-0.03160182759165764,
0.043299172073602676,
0.00455512898042798,
0.04098343104124069,
-0.003728678449988365,
0.015375567600131035,
-0.0673501119017601,
-0.018064172938466072,
-0.015503021888434887,
-0.0010057621402665973,
0.029839729890227318,
-0.03287537768483162,
0.020823365077376366,
-0.10805375128984451,
-0.007069883402436972,
0.0038452083244919777,
-0.034126173704862595,
0.008894640952348709,
-0.0497208908200264,
-0.006982109975069761,
0.02225380204617977,
-0.01772168278694153,
-0.023500248789787292,
-0.07236016541719437,
0.046777356415987015,
-0.00515257241204381,
-0.020589957013726234,
-0.015232517383992672,
-0.024309003725647926,
-0.061875391751527786,
0.05847129225730896,
0.03206692636013031,
-0.018307490274310112,
-0.017406858503818512,
0.0007048120023682714,
-0.01410047709941864,
0.066175177693367,
0.06554125994443893,
-0.04130258411169052,
-0.12581244111061096,
-0.03098084218800068,
0.09361426532268524,
-0.05962880328297615,
-0.009809533134102821,
-0.0605846643447876,
0.004153029061853886,
-0.000692673958837986,
0.11370112746953964,
0.09851057827472687,
-0.001990559743717313,
0.029427018016576767,
-0.02833077870309353,
-0.009188467636704445,
0.033239349722862244,
0.02114318311214447,
-0.0059463344514369965,
-0.0777207463979721
] | {
"pdf_file": "DR2YP7NU7CR3XVU26T53RUKCUZ35HV5B.pdf",
"text": "1IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT\nFOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA\nAARON C. LEWIS,\nPetitioner,\nv. Civil Action No. 3:06-CV-47\nCriminal Action No. 3:03-CR-17\nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (JUDGE BAILEY)\nRespondent.\nREPORT AND RECOMMENDATION \nTHAT § 2255 MOTION BE DENIED\nI. INTRODUCTION\nOn May 11, 2006, pro se petitioner filed a Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set\nAside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody. The Government filed its responseMay 30, 2007. \nII. FACTS\nA. Conviction and Sentence\nPetitioner was named in a twelve count superseding indictment filed on June 3, 2003 in\nthe Northern District of West Virginia. Petitioner was charged in count 1 in a conspiracy topossess with the intent to distribute more than 50 grams of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C.§ 846; in counts 2, 5, 7, 9, and 10 with distribution of six ounces of cocaine base in violation of\n21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); in counts 3, 4, 6, 8, and 11 with distribution of 1.85 grams of cocaine basein violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); and in c ount 12 with aiding and abetting the distribution of\n.37 grams of crack in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. § 841. 2On August 13, 2003, petitioner was convicted by a jury on all twelve counts. On\nNovember 4, 2003, petitioner was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 275 months on counts1, 2, 5, 7, 9, and 10 and 240 months, concurrent, on counts 3, 4, 6, 8, 11, and 12.B. Appeal\nOn November 10, 2003, petitioner filed a notice of appeal. On July 6, 2004, the Fourth\nCircuit Court of Appeals affirmed petitioner’s conviction and sentence. Petitioner petitioned theUnited States Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari. The Supreme Court denied petitioner’spetition on February 22, 2005.C. Federal Habeas Corpus\nThe petitioner asserts the following grounds for relief:1. The Court did not have jurisdiction over the conspiracy alleged in Count 1\nbecause petitioner was a juvenile during a portion of the conspiracy and the Court did notcomply with the requirements of the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act, 18 U.S.C. § 5301, forprosecuting a juvenile. \n2. The Government’s failure to submit a Bill of Particulars detailing when, where,\nand with whom the acts in Counts 2 through 7 occurred prejudiced petitioner because he wasunable to adequately prepare a defense for trial.\n3. Newly discovered evidence, namely a Bill of Sale, establishes the government’s\nwitness, David Rosario, fabricated his statem ents about having bought cocaine from petitioner\non March 28, 2002. \n4. The Government’s witnesses Joseph Lockett and Jonathan Crawford made\nstatements to the grand jury that were inconsistent with their prior statements made to 3investigators. Furthermore, there was insufficient evidence to convict petitioner of the\nsubstantive drug charges in counts 2 through 11.\nIn its response to the Petitioner’s motion, the Government asserts:1. The Court had jurisdiction over the acts alleged in Count 1 because although\npetitioner joined the conspiracy as a juvenile, he continued his involvement as an adult.\n2. Although the Government did not submit a Bill of Particulars, the superseding\nindictment, witness lists, Jencks\n and Giglio materials provided to petitioner before trial\nsufficiently apprised petitioner of the charges against him. \n3. The Bill of Sale does not establish David Rosario fabricated his testimony. \nFurthermore, petitioner failed to prove the five elements necessary for receiving a new trialbased on newly discovered evidence.\n4. Petitioner failed to prove that no reasonable jury could have convicted him of the\nsubstantive drug charges in counts 2 through 11.\nD. Recommendation\nBased upon a review of the record, the undersigned recommends that Petitioner’s § 2255\nmotion be denied and dismissed from the docket because his claims are without merit. \nIII. ANALYSIS\n“A petitioner collaterally attacking his senten ce or conviction bears the burden of proving\nhis sentence or conviction was imposed in viola tion of the Constitution or laws of the United\nStates, that the court was without jurisdiction to impose such a sentence, that the sentence\nexceeded the maximum authorized by law, or that the sentence otherwise is subject to collateral\nattack. 28 U.S.C. § 2255. A motion collatera lly attacking a petitioner’s sentence brought 4pursuant to § 2255 requires the petitioner to establish his grounds by a preponderance of the\nevidence.” Sutton v. United States of America , 2006 WL 36859, at *2 (E.D. Va. Jan. 4, 2006).\nA. Timeliness of Motion\nIn 1996, the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 [“AEDPA”] was\nenacted, establishing a one-year limitation period with in which to file any federal habeas corpus\nmotion. 28 U.S.C. §2255. The limitation period shall run from the latest of:\n1) the date on which the judgment of conviction becomes final;2) the date on which the impediment to making the motion created by governmental\naction in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States is removed, if the movant was\nprevented from making a motion by such governmental action;\n3) the date on which the right asserted wa s initially recognized by the Supreme Court, if\nthat right has been newly recognized by the Supr eme Court and made retroactively applicable to\ncases on collateral review; or\n4) the date on which the facts supporting the claim or claims presented could have been\ndiscovered through the exercise of due diligence. 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Where a federal prisoner files a petition a writ of certiorari with the UnitedStates Supreme Court, the judgment of convic tion becomes final - thereby triggering the one-\nyear limitation - when the Supreme Court either denies certiorari or issues a decision on the\nmerits. Clay v. United States\n, 537 U.S. 522, 525 (2003). \nIn the present case, the Supreme Court denied petitioner’s writ of certiorari on February\n22, 2005. Petitioner therefore had until February 22, 2006 to file his motion under § 2255. On\nFebruary 22, 2006, petitioner requested the Court gr ant him a two month ex tension to file his\nmotion under § 2255. On March 13, 2006, the Court granted petitioner’s request and extended 5the period within which petitioner may file his motion to May 12, 2006. Petitioner filed his\nmotion on May 11, 2006. Because petitioner filed his § 2255 motion within the period of timedesignated by the Court, the Court finds petitioner’s motion was timely. B. Procedurally Defaulted Issues\nBefore evaluating the merits of Petitioner’s claims, the Court must determine which of\nPetitioner’s issues he may bring in his § 2255 motion. It is well settled non-constitutional issuesthat could have been raised on direct appeal but were not may not be rais ed in a collateral attack\nsuch as a § 2255 motion. Sunal v. Large\n, 332 U.S. 174, 178-79 (1947); Bousley v. United\nStates , 523 U.S. 614 (1998). Constitutional issues that were capable of being raised on direct\nappeal but were not may be raised in a § 2255 motion so long as the petitioner demonstrates 1)“cause” that excuses his procedural default, a nd 2) “actual prejudice” resulting from the alleged\nerrors. United States v. Maybeck\n, 23 F.3d 888, 891 (1994). Petitioner may alternatively\ndemonstrate “actual innocence,” or that it is more lik ely than not, in light of all the evidence, that\nno reasonable juror would have convicted him.” Bousley v. United States , 523 U.S. 614, 621\n(1998). Finally, issues previously rejected on direct appeal may not be raised in a collateral\nattack. Boeckenhaupt v. United States , 537 F.2d 1182 (4th Cir. 1976). \nThe Court finds petitioner is not barred from raising his first issue because challenges to\nthe jurisdiction of the Court may be raised on collateral attack. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255; see , also ,\nSunal v. Large , 332 U.S. 174, 178-179 (1947). However, pe titioner is barred from raising issues\n2 and 3 because he has failed to show “cause” a nd “prejudice” for failing to raise them on direct\nappeal. Maybeck , 23 F.3d at 891. Furthermor e, petitioner is barred from raising issue 4 because\nchallenges to the sufficiency of the evidence may not be raised on collateral attack and because 1 Petitioner raised the following four issues on direct appeal: 1) Whether the United\nStates presented sufficient evidence to support defendant’s conviction on the substantive drugdistribution charges; 2) whether the district court committed clear error in its calculation ofdefendant’s relevant conduct; 3) whether the district court plainly erred in its instructions to thejury as to the object of the conspiracy; 4) whether the district court plainly erred in itsinstructions to the jury concerning defendant’s Pinkerton\n (Pinkerton v. United States , 328 U.S.\n640 (1946)) liability regarding charged conspiracy. \n2 The “act” alleged in Count 1 is the “criminal agreement” itself, not any of the actual\ndistributions of cocaine that were the object of the criminal conspiracy. United States v.\nShambani , 513 U.S. 10, 16 (1994). As held by the Supreme Court, the government, in order to\nprove a violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846, “need not prove the commission of any overt acts infurtherance of the conspiracy. . . . [T]he criminal agreement itself is the actus reas.” Id.\n \n6petitioner’s previous challenge, made on direct appeal, to the sufficiency of the evidence as to\ncounts 2, 5, 7, 9, and 10 was rejected. Boeckenhaupt , 537 F.2d at 1182.1 \nB. Issue 1 - Whether the Court Had Jurisdiction Over Count 1\nPetitioner alleges the Court did not have jurisdiction over the conspiracy charged in\nCount 1 because petitioner was a juvenile through a period of the conspiracy and the Court failedto comply with the requirements of the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act, 18 U.S.C. § 5031 et\nseq for prosecuting a juvenile. The Government contends the Court had jurisdiction over Count\n1 because although petitioner was a juvenile at the time he joined the conspiracy, he remained inthe conspiracy as an adult. \nThe Court finds the trial Court had jurisdiction over the acts alleged in Count 1.\n2 Count 1\nof the superseding indictment charged petitioner in a conspiracy alleged to have occurred “fromon or about January, 1999 to on or about the date of the return of the indictment,” or June 3,\n2003. Because petitioner was born on January 7, 1984, acts committed by petitioner prior toJanuary 7, 2002 were committed as a juvenile and acts committed by petitioner on or afterJanuary 7, 2002 were committed as an adult. Petitioner therefore allegedly joined the conspiracyas a juvenile. However, because the Government proved petitioner’s involvement in the 7conspiracy continued into his adulthood, the Court had jurisdiction and his conviction may be\nsustained. United States v. Spoone , 741 F.2d 680 (4th Cir. 1984) [upholding conspiracy\nconviction of adult defendant who joined conspiracy as a juvenile yet committed one overt act infurtherance of the conspiracy as an adult]. The fact the Government presented evidence of\npetitioner’s involvement as a juvenile does not disturb the Court’s finding because the Court\nfinds the jury was properly instructed they were to consider evidence of petitioner’s juvenileinvolvement merely for purposes outlined in the F.R.E. § 404(b) (such as knowledge, intent, andmotive), not as evidence of his guilt of the crime. Id.\n at 687; see F.R.E. 404(b). Finally, the\nCourt finds petitioner’s reliance on the Federal Juvenile Delinquency Act is misplaced. The Actapplies to the prosecution of a juvenile in federal court. 18 U.S.C. §§ 5031, 5032. The Act doesnot apply to the prosecution of an adult in federal court who joined a conspiracy as a juvenile. Spoone\n, 741 F.2d at 687. \nC. Issue 2 - Whether Petitioner was Prejudiced By the Government’s Failure to \nSubmit a Bill of Particulars\nPetitioner argues the Government’s failure to submit a Bill of Particulars as to Counts 2\nthrough 7 of the indictment prejudiced his ability to prepare a defense for trial. The Governmentcontends although the Government did not comply with the Court’s order to submit a Bill ofParticulars, petitioner was not prejudiced by the Government’s noncompliance becausepetitioner received the requested information in the superseding indictment, witness lists, andJencks\n and Giglio material. \nThe original indictment filed April 2, 2003 charged petitioner in Counts 2 through 7 with\ndistributing cocaine base, “in or about January, February and March of 2002,” in violation of 21 3 Docket No. 1.\n4 Docket No. 15.\n5 Docket No. 19.\n6 The superseding indictment also added four additional charges, Counts 9, 10, 11, and\n12.\n8U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).3 On April 30, 2003, petitioner moved the Court to order the Government to\nsubmit a Bill of Particulars detailing a) the identity of others involved in each count, b) thealleged circumstances of petitioner’s participation in each count, c) which acts were purportedlycommitted by petitioner while he was under eighteen, d) what acts in support of the conspiracywere purportedly committed by petitioner after he was eighteen, e) additional detail on the timeand location of the acts charged in Counts 2 through 7.\n4 On May 14, 2003, the Court granted\npetitioner’s motion, ordering the Government to submit a Bill of Particulars stating when, where,and with whom the acts in Counts 1 through 7 took place and which, if any, of the alleged actswere committed prior to petitioner’s eighteenth birthday.\n5 The Government objected to the\nOrder but the Court’s Order was affirmed.\nOn June 3, 2003, the Government filed a superseding indictment that specified in greater\ndetail the dates of the alleged acts in Counts 2 through 7.6 The new dates established the alleged\nacts were committed by petitioner after he turned eighteen. The superseding indictment did not,however, provide any detail as to where or with whom the acts in Counts 2 through 7 took place. On May 27, 2003, the Government provided petitioner with a witness list and Jencks\n and Giglio\nmaterial. The Government never submitted a Bill of Particulars. \nThe Court finds petitioner was not prejudiced by the Government’s failure to submit the\nBill of Particulars because the superseding indictment, witnesses lists, and Jencks and Giglio\nmaterials provided the information originally sought in the Bill of Particulars and sufficientlyenabled petitioner to prepare a defense, minimize surprise at trial, and avoid double jeopardy. 9United States v. Fletcher , 74 F.3d 49, 53 (4th Cir. 1996); United States v. Shembari , 484 F.2d\n931, 934-35 (4th Cir. 1973). Specifically, the date s contained in the superseding indictment\nsufficiently apprised petitioner of “when” the acts in Counts 2 through 7 occurred, that all acts inCounts 2 through 7 occurred after petitioner turned eighteen, and “where” each alleged actoccurred. Similarly, the witness lists sufficiently apprised petitioner of the individuals “withwhom” the acts in Counts 2 through 7 took place and were given to petitioner in sufficient timebefore trial. The Court finds the failure of the witness lists to specify which witness wouldtestify to which of the alleged acts is insignificant, because the government need not provide“detailed disclosure of the government’s evidence in advance of trial.” United States v.\nAutomated Medical Labs, Inc. , 770 F.2d 399, 405 (4th Cir. 1985). Petitioner was permitted to\ncontact the witnesses to determine the specifics of their testimony.D. Issue 3 - Whether the Government’s Witne ss Fabricated Evidence Before the Grand\nJury .\nPetitioner alleges newly discovered evidence establishes David Rosario, a witness for the\nGovernment, fabricated statements to Detective Snyder. The Government argues the “newlydiscovered” evidence fails to establish Mr. Rosario fabricated testimony. Additionally, theGovernment alleges even if the evidence establishes Mr. Rosario fabricated testimony, theevidence fails to establish grounds for vacating petitioner’s conviction.\nOn June 3, 2003, Detective Snyder testified before the grand jury about statements made\nto him by David Rosario. The statements, which established the basis for Count 12, concerned acontrolled buy made by an undercover agent from Mr. Rosario. Detective Snyder testified to thegrand jury Mr. Rosario told him he obtained the drugs at issue from a black male in a greenSUV. Detective Snyder also testified Mr. Rosario, after pleading guilty and getting debriefed, 10said he obtained the drugs at issue from petitioner on March 28, 2002. Petitioner concedes that\nhe owned a green color SUV but argues he did not purchase a green color SUV until April 6,2003. Petitioner has submitted a Bill of Sale as proof of his purchase and proof Mr. Rosariofabricated his statements to Detective Snyder. \nThe Court finds petitioner’s argument is without merit. First, the Bill of Sale establishes\npetitioner bought a green-color SUV on April 6, 2002, not\n April 6, 2003 as alleged by petitioner. \nSecond, the Bill of Sale does not definitively establish Mr. Rosario fabricated his testimony. The proximity in time between March 28, 2002 (the date Mr. Rosario alleged he encounteredpetitioner in the green SUV) and April 6, 2002 (the date petitioner bought his car) makes itentirely possible Mr. Rosario was merely mistaken as to the exact date of the transaction asopposed to intentionally fabricating evidence. Second, even if the Bill of Sale could beconstrued as proving Mr. Rosario fabricated his testimony, petitioner has failed to establish therequired grounds for a new trial. Pursuant to Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of CriminalProcedure, a motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence may be granted if thepetitioner proves all the following five factors:\n“a) the evidence must be, in fact, newly discovered, i.e., discovered since the trial; b) the facts must be alleged from which the court may infer diligence on the part of the movant;c) the evidence relied on must not be merely cumulative or impeaching; d) it must be material to the issues involved; and e) it must be such, and of such nature, that on a new trial, the newly discovered evidence would probably produce an aquittal.”\nUnited States v. Custis\n, 988 F.2d 1355, 1359 (4th Cir. 1993) (quoting United States v. Bales , 813\nF.2d 1289, 1295 (4th Cir. 1987); see , also , United States v. Singh , 54 F.3d 1182, 1190 (4th Cir.\n1995). Petitioner has failed to prove the above elements. First, petitioner has failed to prove the 7 Joseph Lockett testified he bought cocaine from petitioner in January, February, and\ninto March. \n8 William Pennington testified at the trial he was in the Eastern Regional jail with Mr.\nRosario and that Mr. Rosario told him he hated petitioner and intended to falsely testify againstpetitioner at trial.\n11Bill of Sale was discovered only since the trial nor that he exercised diligence in attempting to\nlocate the Bill of Sale. Presumably, petitioner was aware prior to the start of the August 11,\n2003 trial that he had purchased a green-color SUV on or about April 2002 and that a Bill ofSale likely existed to prove the date of his purchase. Second, petitioner has failed to show theBill of Sale would “probably produce an acquitta l.” The Bill of Sale would merely have\nimpeached Mr. Rosario’s ability to accurately recall dates rather than produce an acquittal due tothe detail of Mr. Rosario’s testimony coupled with Joseph Lockett’s testimony petitionerdistributed cocaine base in March 2002.\n7 Although William Pennington testified Mr. Rosario\nintended to falsely testify against petitioner, 8 William Pennington’s testimony was\nuncorroborated.E. Issue 4 - Whether There was Sufficient Evidence to Convict Petitioner of Counts 2 \nThrough 11 .\nPetitioner alleges witnesses Joseph Lockett’s and Jonathan Crawford’s statements to the\ngrand jury were inconsistent with their statements to investigators and that Lockett’s testimonywas “unsubstantiated and uncorroborated” such that it was “unreasonable for the jury to baseconvictions on such evidence.” Petitioner thus broadly alleges there was insufficient evidence tosupport his convictions of counts 2 through 11. The Government contends petitioner has failed\nto show the evidence was insufficient. \nGenerally, a jury’s conviction may be reversed for insufficient evidence where, “viewing\nthe evidence in the light most favourable to the government, any rational trier of fact would have 9 Lockett admitted on cross-examination he had not originally told investigators about the\nsix ounce quantities and that he had testified to the grand jury his purchases from petition beganin the Fall of 2002. \n12found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” United States v. Reavis\n, 48 F.3d 763,\n771 (4th Cir. 1995). Because it is the jury’s view of the sufficiency of the evidence which\ncontrols, “[t]he relevant question is not whether the appellate court is [itself] convinced beyond areasonable doubt.” Id.\n; Burks v. Unites States , 437 U.S. 1, 17 (1978). Similarly, it is the jury’s\nprovince, not the appellate court’s, to evaluate and determine a witness’ credibility. Johnson v\nUnited States , 271 F.2d 596, 597 (4th Cir. 1959) [holding, “it is the duty of the trier of fact to\nhear the evidence, to determine the credibility of the witnesses and to determine the weight to beaccorded to the testimony of each witness”]. \nThe Court finds petitioner has failed to meet his burden of showing that no rational jury\ncould have found him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of counts 2 through 11. Reavis\n, 48 F.3d\nat 771. Regarding Counts 2, 5, 7, 9, and 10, witness Lockett testified he purchased six ounces ofcocaine from petitioner on five occasions, beginning around the time of the Superbowl in 2002,two weeks following the Superbowl, near Valentine’s Day, and the first and third weeks inMarch 2002. Petitioner argues Lockett’s prior statements to the grand jury that petitioner soldhim 28 grams on each occasion, rather than six ounces, impeached his testimony and left histestimony “uncorroborated and unsubstantiated.” In viewing the evidence in the light mostfavourable to the government, the Court finds there was sufficient evidence for a jury toconvicted petitioner of counts 2, 5, 7, 9, and 10. Furthermore, the Court notes the jury was madeaware of Lockett’s inconsistent statements to the grand jury and investigators\n9 and nevertheless\ndecided to believe Lockett’s testimony, as evidenced by their conviction on counts 2, 5, 7, 9, and 1310. The Court will not disturb the jury’s assessment of a witness’ credibility. Johnson , 271\nF.2d at 597.\nSimilarly, the Court finds petitioner has failed to prove that no rational jury could find\nhim guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of counts 3, 4, 6, 8, and 11. Witness Crawford testifiedbefore the jury that he purchased “wholesale” amounts of cocaine base from petitioner five to tentimes in early 2002, in or around January, February and March. Petitioner argues Crawford’stestimony was inconsistent with statements he made to the grand jury that the purchasesoccurred in 2000 and 2001. The Court, again, finds, petitioner has failed to meet his burden ofproving his convicted rested on insufficient evid ence. In addition to there being sufficient\nevidence to support his conviction for counts 3, 4, 6, 8, and 11, including Crawford’s testimonyand other witness’ testimony establishing petitioner’s involvement in the sale of drugs on orabout January, February, and March 2002, the jury determined Crawford’s testimony wascredible. The Court will not disturb its finding. Johnson\n, 271 F.2d at 597.\nV. Recommendation\nFor the foregoing reasons, the undersigned recommends that Petitioner’s § 2255 motion\nbe denied and dismissed from the docket because petitioner’s claims are without merit. \nWithin ten (10) days after being served with a copy of this report and recommendation,\nany party may file with the Clerk of Court written objections identifying those portions of therecommendation to which objection is made and the basis for such objections. A copy of anyobjections shall also be submitted to the Honorable John P. Bailey, United States District Judge. Failure to timely file objections to this recommendation will result in waiver of the right toappeal from a judgment of this Court based upon such recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); 14Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841 (4th Cir. 1985): United\nStates v. Schronce , 727 F.2d 91 (4th Cir. 1984), cert. denied , 467 U.S. 1208 (1984).\nThe Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Report and Recommendation to the pro se\nplaintiff and counsel of record, as applicable.\nDATED: November 15, 2007\n/s/ James E. Seibert\nJAMES E. SEIBERT\nUNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE"
} |
[
-0.04066752642393112,
-0.038512494415044785,
-0.019237330183386803,
0.05321015045046806,
0.003533785231411457,
0.08081866055727005,
-0.048193272203207016,
0.012923787347972393,
-0.08005456626415253,
0.057774618268013,
0.03719793260097504,
0.010789871215820312,
0.059016939252614975,
-0.04833739250898361,
-0.07637498527765274,
-0.0006344665307551622,
0.06673911958932877,
0.03077201545238495,
-0.051493823528289795,
-0.05389894172549248,
0.02168433926999569,
0.03918968141078949,
-0.023276330903172493,
0.03213991969823837,
0.02000959776341915,
0.042487725615501404,
-0.05632207170128822,
-0.04477658495306969,
-0.05911970138549805,
0.026173831894993782,
-0.023212283849716187,
-0.03309444710612297,
0.06866122037172318,
0.021365592256188393,
0.02663564123213291,
-0.006248948164284229,
0.08750864118337631,
0.051130954176187515,
-0.021313747391104698,
0.026237143203616142,
-0.07994058728218079,
0.006948207039386034,
0.013438615016639233,
0.06117125228047371,
-0.004339620936661959,
-0.03578240051865578,
-0.09448124468326569,
-0.0868992730975151,
-0.06719464063644409,
-0.03956538066267967,
-0.03933950141072273,
0.014757399447262287,
-0.021902555599808693,
0.017653420567512512,
-0.022314827889204025,
0.0940912514925003,
-0.03555966913700104,
-0.07906896620988846,
-0.026217758655548096,
-0.08711153268814087,
-0.06388841569423676,
-0.03235263004899025,
-0.010446710512042046,
0.03507201001048088,
0.10080960392951965,
0.020426705479621887,
-0.04440884664654732,
-0.03074299916625023,
0.03053237684071064,
0.08659229427576065,
-0.018329240381717682,
-0.019193287938833237,
-0.06309673935174942,
0.11242517083883286,
0.025316424667835236,
0.053687792271375656,
0.04607440158724785,
0.0811135545372963,
0.09217168390750885,
-0.04592544957995415,
-0.03454241529107094,
-0.03940323740243912,
-0.08456593006849289,
0.014615613035857677,
0.05550404638051987,
-0.06631028652191162,
-0.00213558878749609,
-0.04186200723052025,
0.021084968000650406,
0.03228817507624626,
0.057563845068216324,
0.024041272699832916,
-0.008874278515577316,
-0.045850008726119995,
0.062151338905096054,
0.0009335583308711648,
-0.018206965178251266,
-0.10546376556158066,
-0.013468603603541851,
0.054721180349588394,
-0.04403066262602806,
0.05206111818552017,
-0.014732036739587784,
-0.0972028374671936,
-0.06061716377735138,
-0.05901287496089935,
0.10069388896226883,
0.03345438465476036,
-0.07299905270338058,
-0.004453737288713455,
-0.0033445709850639105,
-0.08003979176282883,
-0.020810049027204514,
0.022690104320645332,
0.05687006935477257,
-0.048739705234766006,
0.05710025504231453,
0.01431497186422348,
0.046736255288124084,
0.014596225693821907,
-0.015445220284163952,
0.026015887036919594,
0.0003059528535231948,
-0.04240429401397705,
-0.02526813931763172,
0.027126360684633255,
-0.03333686292171478,
9.721791581309354e-33,
0.01623665727674961,
-0.003940558061003685,
0.04609125852584839,
-0.02606585994362831,
-0.05956156551837921,
0.00243041361682117,
0.04929704964160919,
0.0008195922710001469,
0.00817625317722559,
-0.008735444396734238,
-0.057689737528562546,
0.03901055455207825,
0.03722077235579491,
0.04777650535106659,
0.0857870951294899,
0.023698516190052032,
-0.023755142465233803,
0.017786050215363503,
-0.05269324406981468,
0.032882511615753174,
0.08190478384494781,
-0.06331045925617218,
0.022260570898652077,
-0.0669727697968483,
0.030629049986600876,
-0.026548665016889572,
0.0002694663417059928,
0.03159802407026291,
-0.05069100856781006,
0.015276468358933926,
0.07620542496442795,
0.03499101102352142,
-0.02166636474430561,
-0.046233419328927994,
0.04612813517451286,
-0.10294046998023987,
0.11459388583898544,
0.006819805596023798,
0.06990958005189896,
-0.013372370041906834,
0.04343464970588684,
0.008135823532938957,
0.04748343676328659,
0.05543818324804306,
0.0007992106257006526,
-0.0011640340089797974,
-0.006471321452409029,
0.04316127300262451,
0.06978373229503632,
0.036724332720041275,
0.007006663363426924,
-0.01811625063419342,
-0.05034489184617996,
-0.063180111348629,
-0.08082735538482666,
0.04665445163846016,
-0.018485940992832184,
0.022071752697229385,
0.0302974171936512,
-0.0627266988158226,
0.024682974442839622,
0.030361056327819824,
-0.037137147039175034,
-0.09808669239282608,
0.002917878096923232,
-0.0037486969958990812,
-0.02466917596757412,
-0.006668603979051113,
0.05993019789457321,
-0.0981348529458046,
0.0175402220338583,
-0.033847782760858536,
0.020417489111423492,
0.014793768525123596,
0.08239534497261047,
-0.0005623637116514146,
0.05259444937109947,
-0.03137887641787529,
0.0722784772515297,
-0.021804392337799072,
-0.05204041674733162,
-0.008793089538812637,
-0.020232893526554108,
-0.09567668288946152,
0.10990233719348907,
-0.11373378336429596,
-0.03549279272556305,
-0.03440869599580765,
0.038398709148168564,
-0.049999479204416275,
0.055735670030117035,
-0.049316562712192535,
-0.10031472891569138,
0.0785256177186966,
-0.06101493537425995,
-9.041102475682507e-33,
-0.02159147337079048,
0.025382498279213905,
0.0219559483230114,
0.07275879383087158,
-0.010209682397544384,
0.010675802826881409,
0.016548234969377518,
-0.10194763541221619,
0.09483456611633301,
-0.10079001635313034,
-0.035953737795352936,
-0.013084662146866322,
0.024393340572714806,
-0.03891061991453171,
0.033949803560972214,
0.028618883341550827,
-0.044297460466623306,
0.014048726297914982,
0.008816512301564217,
-0.023094981908798218,
0.0428207591176033,
0.05740613490343094,
0.00941931176930666,
-0.009293507784605026,
0.021612105891108513,
-0.007952559739351273,
-0.05504359304904938,
0.02843540534377098,
-0.03634505718946457,
0.017645953223109245,
0.1451774388551712,
-0.07077205926179886,
-0.06785135716199875,
0.012911796569824219,
-0.11994335055351257,
-0.08505306392908096,
0.03653417527675629,
-0.037576302886009216,
-0.08042372763156891,
0.06804434210062027,
0.08400038629770279,
-0.012263594195246696,
-0.06464482098817825,
0.044716689735651016,
0.06699810922145844,
0.034912243485450745,
0.026405034586787224,
-0.022563859820365906,
-0.02490447647869587,
0.05239998549222946,
0.012863817624747753,
-0.08113466948270798,
-0.025806689634919167,
0.0735962763428688,
0.09898585081100464,
0.02515546604990959,
0.008911973796784878,
-0.033975280821323395,
-0.05113765969872475,
0.01311246957629919,
0.07964133471250534,
0.048242613673210144,
-0.019943956285715103,
0.014647497795522213,
0.12668783962726593,
0.0025062141939997673,
-0.03423991799354553,
0.031785108149051666,
-0.04571405425667763,
0.010908625088632107,
-0.07141058892011642,
-0.015752732753753662,
-0.03157328814268112,
-0.0977773666381836,
-0.02573692984879017,
0.04894401133060455,
0.0027955863624811172,
0.062395598739385605,
-0.05574580654501915,
0.04873182252049446,
-0.08371251821517944,
-0.00813484750688076,
-0.05510842427611351,
-0.023882703855633736,
-0.05878553166985512,
-0.0002974767121486366,
0.07192651927471161,
-0.08420565724372864,
0.06011653691530228,
0.0368603952229023,
-0.043755169957876205,
0.03607596084475517,
-0.009553431533277035,
-0.005366343539208174,
0.0004011768032796681,
-5.81508174946066e-8,
0.07043419033288956,
0.0806552991271019,
-0.06969237327575684,
0.08301127701997757,
0.11217083781957626,
0.005744548048824072,
-0.06758394092321396,
-0.01828739233314991,
-0.011425151489675045,
-0.007983987219631672,
0.02570725977420807,
-0.09571199119091034,
0.008649463765323162,
-0.09913747757673264,
0.06269310414791107,
0.008567824959754944,
0.011692414060235023,
0.09219338744878769,
-0.0679011195898056,
-0.006806530989706516,
0.052886560559272766,
0.01834724470973015,
-0.02411780320107937,
0.0027977542486041784,
-0.016418935731053352,
-0.003852034453302622,
0.012816259637475014,
0.038560621440410614,
0.011185483075678349,
-0.03512939438223839,
0.02052372507750988,
-0.047141361981630325,
0.07034233212471008,
-0.007065018638968468,
0.007002144120633602,
0.0014315214939415455,
-0.06255103647708893,
0.005761852487921715,
0.044286713004112244,
0.023129230365157127,
-0.02643306367099285,
0.02129046432673931,
0.05344480648636818,
0.04393733665347099,
0.06079413369297981,
-0.02129284292459488,
-0.09886375069618225,
0.06105523556470871,
0.02427252195775509,
-0.03162425756454468,
-0.011912671849131584,
-0.044521644711494446,
-0.11827019602060318,
-0.0115180853754282,
0.05444500222802162,
0.012927056290209293,
0.05008973553776741,
-0.026772884652018547,
-0.022733109071850777,
-0.03218739479780197,
0.056559108197689056,
-0.03428718447685242,
-0.10225587338209152,
0.07708998769521713
] | {
"pdf_file": "WDNSSVM2QPMMUUDT4YEHYDPAALFYP2O7.pdf",
"text": "http://ed.sc.gov\nhttp://www.sceoc.orgReuben Elementary\n3605 Spearman Rd.\nNewberry, SC 29108\nGrades PK−5 Elementary School\nEnrollment 230 Students\nPrincipal Gloria M. Owens 803−321−2664\nSuperintendent Bennie Bennett 803−321−2600\nBoard Chair Lee Attaway 803−345−7083\nAbsolute Rating AVERAGE\nAbsolute Ratings of Elementary Schools with Students like Ours\nExcellent Good Average Below Average Unsatisfactory\n01 9 7 21 3 0\nImprovement Rating UNSATISFACTORY\nAdequate Yearly Progress YES\nThis school met 13 out of 13 objectives. The objectives included performance\nand participation of students in various groups.\nDefinition: As required by the United States Department of Education, Adequate Yearly Progress\nspecifies that the statewide target is met for All Students and for the following subgroups: Racial/Ethnic,Subsidized Meals, Disability, and Limited English Proficiency.\nSouth Carolina Performance Goal\nBy 2010, South Carolina’s student achievement will be ranked in the top half of the states\nnationally. To achieve this goal, we must become one of the fastest improving systems in thecountry. Abbreviations for Missing Data\nN/ANot Applicable N/AV Not Available N/CNot Collected N/RNot Reported I/SInsufficient SampleReuben Elementary 2/7/07 3601015\nPerformance Trends Over 4 −Year Period\nAbsolute Rating Improvement Rating Adequate Yearly Progress\n2003 Good Unsatisfactory Yes\n2004 Average Below Average Yes\n2005 Average Average Yes\n2006 Average Unsatisfactory Yes\nDefinitions of School Rating Terms\nExcellent − School performance substantially exceeds the standards for progress toward the 2010 SC\nPerformance GoalGood − School performance exceeds the standards for progress toward the 2010 SC Performance GoalAverage − School performance meets the standards for progress toward the 2010 SC Performance GoalBelow Average − School is in jeopardy of not meeting the standards for progress toward the 2010 SCPerformance GoalUnsatisfactory − School performance fails to meet the standards for progress toward the 2010 SC PerformanceGoal\nPercent of Student PACT Records Matched for Purposes of Computing Improvement RatingPercent of students tested in 2005−06 whose 2004−05 test scores were located. 95.0%Palmetto Achievement Challenge Tests (PACT)\nEnglish/Language Arts Mathematics Science Social Studies\nOur School\n25.32.4\n36.1\n36.125.32.4\n36.1\n36.157.813.3\n15.7\n13.3 57.857.813.3\n15.7\n13.351.8\n6.07.2\n34.951.8\n6.07.2\n34.934.9\n9.6\n10.8\n44.634.9\n9.6\n10.8\n44.6\nElementary Schools with Students like Ours\n41.73.9\n20.9\n33.541.73.9\n20.9\n33.511.9\n22.5\n20.545.011.9\n22.5\n20.545.040.0\n9.7\n13.4\n36.940.0\n9.7\n13.4\n36.929.5 9.9\n16.843.829.5 9.9\n16.843.8\nDefinition of Critical Terms\nAdvanced Very high score; very well prepared to work at next grade level; exceeded expectations\nProficient Well prepared to work at next grade level; met expectations\nBasic Met standards; minimally prepared, can go to next grade level\nBelow Basic Did not meet standards; must have an academic assistance plan; the local board policy\ndetermines progress to the next grade level Abbreviations for Missing Data\nN/ANot Applicable N/AV Not Available N/CNot Collected N/RNot Reported I/SInsufficient SampleReuben Elementary 2/7/07 3601015\nPACT Performance by Group\nEnglish/Language Arts − State Performance Objective = 38.2%\nAll Students 86 100.0 25.3 36.1 36.1 2.4 47.0 Yes YesGenderMale 40 100.0 36.8 39.5 23.7 0.0 28.9 N/A N/AFemale 46 100.0 15.6 33.3 46.7 4.4 62.2 N/A N/ARacial/Ethnic GroupWhite 51 100.0 22.4 26.5 46.9 4.1 55.1 Yes YesAfrican American 32 100.0 32.3 51.6 16.1 0.0 32.3 I/S I/SAsian/Pacific Islander N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A I/S I/SHispanic 3 100.0 I/S I/S I/S I/S I/S I/S I/SAmerican Indian/Alaskan N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A I/S I/SDisability StatusNot Disabled 76 100.0 19.2 39.7 38.4 2.7 49.3 N/A N/ADisabled 10 100.0 70.0 10.0 20.0 0.0 30.0 I/S I/SMigrant StatusMigrant 2 100.0 I/S I/S I/S I/S I/S N/A N/ANon−Migrant 84 100.0 25.9 35.8 35.8 2.5 46.9 N/A N/AEnglish ProficiencyLimited English Proficient 2 100.0 I/S I/S I/S I/S I/S I/S I/SNon−Limited English Proficient 84 100.0 25.9 35.8 35.8 2.5 46.9 N/A N/ASocio −Economic Status\nSubsidized meals 48 100.0 32.6 45.7 21.7 0.0 32.6 Yes YesFull−pay meals 38 100.0 16.2 24.3 54.1 5.4 64.9 N/A N/A\nMathematics − State Performance Objective = 36.7%\nAll Students 86 100.0 15.7 57.8 13.3 13.3 42.2 Yes YesGenderMale 40 100.0 21.1 60.5 2.6 15.8 36.8 N/A N/AFemale 46 100.0 11.1 55.6 22.2 11.1 46.7 N/A N/ARacial/Ethnic GroupWhite 51 100.0 12.2 49.0 18.4 20.4 55.1 Yes YesAfrican American 32 100.0 22.6 71.0 6.5 0.0 22.6 I/S I/SAsian/Pacific Islander N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A I/S I/SHispanic 3 100.0 I/S I/S I/S I/S I/S I/S I/SAmerican Indian/Alaskan N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A I/S I/SDisability StatusNot Disabled 76 100.0 13.7 58.9 13.7 13.7 42.5 N/A N/ADisabled 10 100.0 30.0 50.0 10.0 10.0 40.0 I/S I/SMigrant StatusMigrant 2 100.0 I/S I/S I/S I/S I/S N/A N/ANon−Migrant 84 100.0 16.0 56.8 13.6 13.6 43.2 N/A N/AEnglish ProficiencyLimited English Proficient 2 100.0 I/S I/S I/S I/S I/S I/S I/SNon−Limited English Proficient 84 100.0 16.0 56.8 13.6 13.6 43.2 N/A N/ASocio −Economic Status\nSubsidized meals 48 100.0 19.6 65.2 8.7 6.5 26.1 Yes YesFull−pay meals 38 100.0 10.8 48.6 18.9 21.6 62.2 N/A N/A Abbreviations for Missing Data\nN/ANot Applicable N/AV Not Available N/CNot Collected N/RNot Reported I/SInsufficient SampleReuben Elementary 2/7/07 3601015\nPACT Performance by Group\nScience\nAll Students 86 100.0 51.8 34.9 6.0 7.2 13.3GenderMale 40 100.0 52.6 28.9 10.5 7.9 18.4Female 46 100.0 51.1 40.0 2.2 6.7 8.9Racial/Ethnic GroupWhite 51 100.0 38.8 40.8 8.2 12.2 20.4African American 32 100.0 71.0 29.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Asian/Pacific Islander N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AHispanic 3 100.0 I/S I/S I/S I/S I/SAmerican Indian/Alaskan N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ADisability StatusNot Disabled 76 100.0 50.7 34.2 6.8 8.2 15.1Disabled 10 100.0 60.0 40.0 0.0 0.0 0.0Migrant StatusMigrant 2 100.0 I/S I/S I/S I/S I/SNon−Migrant 84 100.0 50.6 35.8 6.2 7.4 13.6English ProficiencyLimited English Proficient 2 100.0 I/S I/S I/S I/S I/SNon−Limited English Proficient 84 100.0 50.6 35.8 6.2 7.4 13.6Socio −Economic Status\nSubsidized meals 48 100.0 67.4 30.4 2.2 0.0 2.2Full−pay meals 38 100.0 32.4 40.5 10.8 16.2 27.0\nSocial Studies\nAll Students 86 100.0 34.9 44.6 10.8 9.6 20.5GenderMale 40 100.0 44.7 36.8 5.3 13.2 18.4Female 46 100.0 26.7 51.1 15.6 6.7 22.2Racial/Ethnic GroupWhite 51 100.0 22.4 49.0 12.2 16.3 28.6African American 32 100.0 58.1 35.5 6.5 0.0 6.5Asian/Pacific Islander N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/AHispanic 3 100.0 I/S I/S I/S I/S I/SAmerican Indian/Alaskan N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/ADisability StatusNot Disabled 76 100.0 34.2 45.2 9.6 11.0 20.5Disabled 10 100.0 40.0 40.0 20.0 0.0 20.0Migrant StatusMigrant 2 100.0 I/S I/S I/S I/S I/SNon−Migrant 84 100.0 35.8 43.2 11.1 9.9 21.0English ProficiencyLimited English Proficient 2 100.0 I/S I/S I/S I/S I/SNon−Limited English Proficient 84 100.0 35.8 43.2 11.1 9.9 21.0Socio −Economic Status\nSubsidized meals 48 100.0 43.5 47.8 6.5 2.2 8.7Full−pay meals 38 100.0 24.3 40.5 16.2 18.9 35.1 Abbreviations for Missing Data\nN/ANot Applicable N/AV Not Available N/CNot Collected N/RNot Reported I/SInsufficient SampleReuben Elementary 2/7/07 3601015\nPACT Performance by Grade Level\nEnglish/Language Arts\n3 30 100.0 6.9 31.0 48.3 13.8 62.1\n4 35 100.0 23.5 50.0 20.6 5.9 26.55 27 100.0 11.5 65.4 23.1 0.0 23.16 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A63 23 100.0 13.0 13.0 69.6 4.3 73.94 32 100.0 26.7 46.7 26.7 0.0 26.75 31 100.0 33.3 43.3 20.0 3.3 23.36 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A\nMathematics\n3 30 100.0 10.3 69.0 20.7 0.0 20.74 35 100.0 20.6 38.2 17.6 23.5 41.25 27 100.0 19.2 65.4 7.7 7.7 15.46 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A63 23 100.0 8.7 69.6 13.0 8.7 21.74 32 100.0 13.3 60.0 13.3 13.3 26.75 31 100.0 23.3 46.7 13.3 16.7 30.06 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A\nScience\n3 30 100.0 41.4 37.9 17.2 3.4 20.74 35 100.0 38.2 32.4 20.6 8.8 29.45 27 100.0 38.5 53.8 3.8 3.8 7.76 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A63 23 100.0 43.5 43.5 4.3 8.7 13.04 32 100.0 50.0 40.0 3.3 6.7 10.05 31 100.0 60.0 23.3 10.0 6.7 16.76 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A\nSocial Studies\n3 30 100.0 6.9 79.3 10.3 3.4 13.84 35 100.0 17.6 47.1 23.5 11.8 35.35 27 100.0 34.6 50.0 11.5 3.8 15.46 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A63 23 100.0 26.1 30.4 30.4 13.0 43.54 32 100.0 36.7 53.3 6.7 3.3 10.05 31 100.0 40.0 46.7 0.0 13.3 13.36 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Abbreviations for Missing Data\nN/ANot Applicable N/AV Not Available N/CNot Collected N/RNot Reported I/SInsufficient SampleReuben Elementary 2/7/07 3601015\nSchool Profile\nOur\nSchoolChange from\nLast YearElementary\nSchools\nwith Students\nLike OursMedian\nElementary\nSchool\nStudents (n= 230)First graders who attended full−day\nkindergarten100.0% No change 100.0% 100.0%\nRetention rate 4.8% Up from 1.7% 3.2% 2.8%\nAttendance rate 96.6% Down from 96.7% 96.2% 96.4%\nStudents with disabilities other than\nspeech taking PACT (ELA) off gradelevel0.0% No change 0.0% 0.0%\nStudents with disabilities other than\nspeech taking PACT (Math) off gradelevel0.0% No change 0.0% 0.0%\nEligible for gifted and talented 7.9% Up from 7.2% 9.8% 10.4%\nOn academic plans 0.0% N/AV 39.2% 33.6%\nOn academic probation 0.0% N/AV 1.3% 1.0%\nWith disabilities other than speech 5.4% Up from 4.5% 8.2% 7.5%\nOlder than usual for grade 0.5% Up from 0.0% 1.0% 0.8%\nOut−of−school suspensions or\nexpulsions for violent &/or criminaloffenses0.0% Down from 0.6% 0.0% 0.0%\nTeachers (n= 14)\nTeachers with advanced degrees 57.1% Up from 26.7% 53.6% 53.8%\nContinuing contract teachers N/AV N/AV N/AV\nClasses not taught by highly qualified\nteachers15.0% N/A 0.0% 2.4%\nTeachers with emergency or\nprovisional certificates0.0% Down from 9.1% 0.0% 0.0%\nTeachers returning from previous year 74.6% Down from 81.3% 87.3% 87.3%\nTeacher attendance rate 94.0% Up from 91.0% 94.9% 94.9%\nAverage teacher salary $38,459 Up 9.6% $42,375 $42,485\nProf. development days/teacher 17.6 days Up from 13.4 days 14.1 days 13.3 days\nSchool\nPrincipal’s years at school 5.0 Up from 4.0 4.0 4.0\nStudent−teacher ratio in core subjects 16.0 to 1 Up from 14.2 to 1 18.3 to 1 18.6 to 1\nPrime instructional time 87.9% Up from 85.5% 89.4% 89.7%\nDollars spent per pupil* $7,520 Up 13.0% $6,344 $6,557\nPercent of expenditures for teacher\nsalaries*58.8% Down from 62.5% 64.4% 64.0%\nPercent of expenditures for instruction* 62.1% 69.0% 69.1%\nOpportunities in the arts Good No change Good Good\nParents attending conferences 96.0% Down from 99.0% 99.0% 99.0%\nSACS accreditation Yes No change Yes Yes\nCharacter development Good No change Excellent Excellent\n* Prior year audited financial data are reported.\nOur District State\nClasses in low poverty schools not taught by highly qualified teachers 9.5% 6.2%Classes in high poverty schools not taught by highly qualified teachers 0.0% 10.2%\nState Objective Met State Objective\nClasses not taught by highly qualified teachers in this school 0.0% NoStudent attendance in this school 94.0%* Yes\n*or greater than last year Reuben Elementary 2/7/07 3601015\nReport of Principal and School Improvement Council\nReuben Elementary was rich with learning and excitement in 2005-06 for teachers as\nwell as students. Teachers utilized a new initiative of the district (Early Release Days) toparticipate in team planning and data analysis. Curriculum mapping was the focus earlyin the year that helped all grade levels get a better picture of the standards covered ineach grade and how these standards build upon each other from year too year. A localcompany donated 15 refurbished laptops to the school, making it possible for theteachers to incorporate technology in their lessons and in their professional lives. Eightteachers took graduate level courses to earn advanced degrees. These endeavorscreated collaborative conversations and planning among the staff, which led to a newenergy and improved instruction in the classrooms. \nStudents were engaged in small group instruction meeting individual needs in all\nclassrooms. Grades 2-5 took Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) twice during theyear and gave teachers academic progress that guided the instruction. During the yearthe students participated in artistic fieldtrips to plays and ballets. Some classes visitedmuseums or the State House. Our fifth grade took its traditional trip to Washington, D.C.in the fall of 2005. Poet Brod Baggert left the students with a huge impression of poetryand entertained the student body by reading his poems. One fifth-grade student wasrecognized by the State for her artwork being selected for use in the 2006 Safe KidsCalendar. Eight students became certified Junior Master Gardeners. \nService projects taken on by the students included collecting peanut butter for the\nhurricane disaster victims, collecting aluminum can tabs for the Ronald McDonald House,and supporting March of Dimes, and Relay for Life. The students raised $1,578.00 forthe Cancer Society. \nMany students and parents attended the PTO Family Night and Sweetheart Dance that\nprovided family entertainment at a minimal cost. The PTO also raised about $15,000 tohelp add to the beautiful playground equipment that was purchased several years ago. \nThe school continued to be a beacon for the community by making AYP goals for the\nthird year. It was also named as a Palmetto Silver Award winner. \nEven though the school did not receive the benefits of being a Title One school for this\nyear, it was still able to provide the after-school program to parents by increasing thecharge for this service. About 45 students participated daily in this program throughoutthe school year. \nAs the spring arrived the school was informed that it would undergo massive renovations\nfor the upcoming year. Mechanical and electrical upgrades will give the school a newlook with windows replaced and new heating and air conditioning units for eachclassroom. These renovations will truly improve the appearance of the school and willmake learning more comfortable for the students. Many people will be curious to see thenew look. It will be exciting to begin the new year with a facelift to the facilities. \nSally Yoder, Chairperson, School Improvement Council\nGloria Owens, Principal\nEvaluations by Teachers, Students, and Parents\nTeachers Students* Parents*\nNumber of surveys returned 12 29 23\nPercent satisfied with learning environment 100.0% 89.7% 91.3%\nPercent satisfied with social and physical environment 100.0% 93.1% 95.7%\nPercent satisfied with school −home relations 100.0% 96.6% 87.0%\n*Only students at the highest elementary school grade level at this school and their parents were included."
} |
[
-0.0235913023352623,
0.0014039580710232258,
0.022297756746411324,
0.0599004290997982,
0.1350279003381729,
0.08509035408496857,
0.07016085833311081,
0.05500468239188194,
-0.006705307401716709,
0.04472062364220619,
0.021488690748810768,
0.046617936342954636,
-0.05392974987626076,
-0.006663813255727291,
-0.04659440368413925,
0.037740688771009445,
0.0007675278466194868,
-0.030863886699080467,
-0.05340511351823807,
0.14526866376399994,
-0.007972108200192451,
0.07636052370071411,
0.08515996485948563,
-0.001136012957431376,
0.0015669716522097588,
0.09740914404392242,
-0.01706077717244625,
-0.015443951822817326,
0.07835967093706131,
0.05005296319723129,
0.028124647215008736,
0.004247594159096479,
0.03799255192279816,
-0.04963255301117897,
-0.025090601295232773,
0.031593650579452515,
0.04138783738017082,
-0.017727365717291832,
-0.02404196187853813,
-0.052582938224077225,
-0.010244341567158699,
-0.0011968063190579414,
-0.004838620312511921,
-0.026896430179476738,
-0.05234445258975029,
-0.021978355944156647,
-0.001702569890767336,
0.03638651967048645,
0.002928885631263256,
-0.025990094989538193,
-0.02887118235230446,
-0.0943387970328331,
0.06892401725053787,
0.007801322266459465,
0.015612627379596233,
0.018387245014309883,
-0.0013794248225167394,
-0.033104076981544495,
-0.04974311590194702,
0.01959243230521679,
-0.05977683886885643,
-0.036034248769283295,
0.05493371561169624,
-0.023435795679688454,
0.044242050498723984,
0.04982651025056839,
0.10339603573083878,
-0.03372368961572647,
0.06510821729898453,
0.026748262345790863,
0.03580979257822037,
0.04375947266817093,
0.14948470890522003,
0.09628302603960037,
-0.012345075607299805,
0.025640415027737617,
0.0028837923891842365,
0.024261796846985817,
0.09912625700235367,
0.028360864147543907,
-0.03818625211715698,
0.03697381913661957,
0.03792665898799896,
-0.08448296785354614,
-0.06498809158802032,
-0.021967703476548195,
-0.0169772207736969,
0.0281448345631361,
-0.013508720323443413,
0.06314720958471298,
-0.09461479634046555,
0.02560940571129322,
0.08699686825275421,
-0.040135037153959274,
-0.06084031984210014,
-0.04493291676044464,
-0.052476659417152405,
-0.005889306776225567,
-0.10326142609119415,
-0.02902000956237316,
-0.02992849238216877,
0.024414600804448128,
0.03540559113025665,
0.012020613998174667,
0.07088514417409897,
-0.02796122245490551,
-0.06905049085617065,
-0.08692605048418045,
-0.10453284531831741,
0.0530170202255249,
-0.053716763854026794,
0.028435787186026573,
0.06311281770467758,
-0.01611950993537903,
0.020316660404205322,
-0.027613479644060135,
-0.003795682918280363,
-0.029900645837187767,
0.04782659932971001,
-0.016081059351563454,
0.06689611077308655,
-0.023929541930556297,
-0.013812101446092129,
-0.016615599393844604,
-0.00020909059094265103,
-0.037426453083753586,
-0.08340675383806229,
4.107882099206085e-34,
0.03194021061062813,
0.04034827649593353,
0.011223864741623402,
0.01416829228401184,
0.03190644085407257,
0.0663367360830307,
-0.0011494578793644905,
-0.11747466772794724,
0.08528352528810501,
-0.022023558616638184,
-0.009475486353039742,
0.005861928686499596,
0.0924496129155159,
-0.036447614431381226,
-0.07893261313438416,
0.00803215242922306,
-0.11253596842288971,
0.014226585626602173,
-0.03530270606279373,
0.04660256206989288,
0.05050715431571007,
-0.0512731559574604,
-0.014113768003880978,
0.01554041262716055,
-0.036490298807621,
0.01284270640462637,
0.010875518433749676,
0.06361730396747589,
0.09042590111494064,
-0.005229244939982891,
-0.00509117916226387,
0.12746328115463257,
0.016432343050837517,
-0.08370868116617203,
-0.01191683579236269,
-0.04316745325922966,
0.020197687670588493,
0.04879162460565567,
-0.09543405473232269,
-0.02199508063495159,
-0.05346260964870453,
0.023653054609894753,
-0.04914280027151108,
-0.001544726430438459,
-0.016742022708058357,
-0.018468594178557396,
0.000860240776091814,
-0.06266675889492035,
-0.014039527624845505,
-0.10296300798654556,
0.054788943380117416,
-0.011625409126281738,
0.01786424033343792,
-0.03898853063583374,
-0.05658723786473274,
0.058930862694978714,
0.009772376157343388,
-0.049367859959602356,
-0.057131409645080566,
-0.05782343074679375,
0.00961383804678917,
-0.10761719942092896,
0.017345568165183067,
-0.005916920490562916,
0.0000941496473387815,
-0.03141693398356438,
-0.046593960374593735,
0.04321442171931267,
-0.03937949612736702,
-0.06635543704032898,
0.05045575276017189,
0.009969569742679596,
-0.035312213003635406,
-0.054676178842782974,
-0.07087615877389908,
-0.024998977780342102,
0.06028054654598236,
-0.02983245439827442,
0.02089487388730049,
-0.01267325785011053,
0.0573759600520134,
0.02936243824660778,
0.09904439747333527,
0.02738061733543873,
0.019776545464992523,
-0.06495477259159088,
-0.0017886674031615257,
0.0618683286011219,
-0.14389443397521973,
-0.014132184907793999,
-0.049802858382463455,
0.029533760622143745,
0.07132451236248016,
0.011309374123811722,
-0.04111257195472717,
-3.0786961119363744e-33,
0.011467493139207363,
0.025940384715795517,
-0.0862758681178093,
0.04930981993675232,
0.019976194947957993,
-0.05169474706053734,
-0.03889863193035126,
0.002748141996562481,
-0.024361828342080116,
-0.047430939972400665,
-0.0037400636356323957,
-0.0317201241850853,
-0.03592904657125473,
0.07560718059539795,
0.0014168231282383204,
-0.07239173352718353,
0.03419306501746178,
0.014232593588531017,
-0.04868905991315842,
-0.012496577575802803,
0.07730428129434586,
-0.005208921618759632,
-0.1242067888379097,
-0.01857391744852066,
0.06588388234376907,
-0.025010166689753532,
0.059131089597940445,
0.024929294362664223,
-0.013296039775013924,
-0.10306918621063232,
-0.03536141291260719,
0.06887628138065338,
0.054454442113637924,
0.06833982467651367,
0.0459989495575428,
0.0034831210505217314,
-0.001392268342897296,
-0.06029083952307701,
-0.0813920795917511,
-0.07081765681505203,
0.04513170197606087,
0.004394750110805035,
-0.060167986899614334,
0.09617990255355835,
-0.05335128679871559,
0.04651862010359764,
0.08715756982564926,
0.006889865733683109,
-0.09443436563014984,
0.037585705518722534,
-0.03890121728181839,
-0.055693913251161575,
-0.048770029097795486,
-0.007161131594330072,
0.043270502239465714,
0.04839800298213959,
0.020711852237582207,
-0.07128951698541641,
0.014693179167807102,
0.00832053367048502,
0.0057868072763085365,
0.07990419119596481,
-0.16860312223434448,
-0.021262751892209053,
-0.014350134879350662,
-0.04874168336391449,
-0.04517791047692299,
-0.01655576378107071,
0.032876018434762955,
-0.029349898919463158,
-0.003543566446751356,
-0.001507224515080452,
0.03543664142489433,
-0.09607740491628647,
-0.0022196148056536913,
-0.0030552155803889036,
-0.0010956524638459086,
-0.029665973037481308,
-0.051201071590185165,
-0.02853343077003956,
0.0040158359333872795,
-0.07507878541946411,
0.031466372311115265,
0.042093969881534576,
0.009767378680408001,
-0.017450058832764626,
0.010566218756139278,
-0.04847206920385361,
-0.02564881183207035,
0.07651668787002563,
-0.03976934030652046,
-0.014063597656786442,
-0.1149231418967247,
0.02988029085099697,
0.021675987169146538,
-5.510429801347527e-8,
0.0987861230969429,
0.03545698896050453,
-0.08296599984169006,
-0.02245316654443741,
0.11039383709430695,
-0.0032817882020026445,
-0.0017002738313749433,
-0.0417819619178772,
-0.07830721884965897,
0.04535060003399849,
0.024502679705619812,
-0.008065230213105679,
-0.010423311032354832,
0.03462541103363037,
-0.025425007566809654,
-0.057380370795726776,
-0.005224522668868303,
0.008967753499746323,
-0.06526050716638565,
0.03250991925597191,
-0.052757520228624344,
-0.014254181645810604,
0.07361643016338348,
0.02431267499923706,
0.01476035825908184,
-0.05373215302824974,
-0.06201685965061188,
0.02523350901901722,
-0.04551628232002258,
-0.057347021996974945,
-0.06410723179578781,
0.017637433484196663,
-0.04808580130338669,
0.040863387286663055,
-0.027846937999129295,
0.004535803571343422,
0.015595927834510803,
0.027003493160009384,
0.07431814819574356,
-0.034128881990909576,
0.025487195700407028,
0.07620848715305328,
0.04427611827850342,
0.03183021768927574,
0.01480056531727314,
-0.04950413852930069,
-0.056608058512210846,
0.013236436061561108,
0.04291996732354164,
0.0642085149884224,
-0.06261365860700607,
-0.04462241753935814,
0.01709543541073799,
0.06546448171138763,
0.07498478889465332,
0.11734859645366669,
-0.02527044713497162,
0.023255128413438797,
-0.0029452398885041475,
0.05112751945853233,
0.02942473813891411,
-0.03316015377640724,
-0.021904850378632545,
-0.00636756606400013
] | {
"pdf_file": "CBGYHKW5VJ4AWKLUIZDTMIIOPZVWDRV6.pdf",
"text": "LARSON CALLS FOR AWARENESS OF SHAKEN BABY SYNDROME\n \n\r\n\r\nFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: April 3, 2001 \n\r\n\r\nLARSON CALLS FOR AWARENESS OF SHAKEN BABY SYNDROME \n\r\nWASHINGTON, D.C.—U.S. Congressman John B. Larson (CT-01) today voted to designate the last full week of this month\nas “National Shaken Baby Syndrome Awareness Week,” as part of National Child Abuse Prevention Month. The resolution\npassed the House this afternoon. \r\nThis measure, H.Con.Res. 59, expresses the sense of Congress that National Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS)\nAwareness Week should be established to raise awareness regarding the syndrome. The resolution also urged that the\nPresident issue a proclamation urging the public to observe this week with appropriate programs and activities. \r\n“Children are completely defenseless, and are totally dependent on adults to care for them in every way, but far too often\nsomeone who is charged with their care, and their lives, hurts or kills babies by shaking them,” said Larson. “Parents and\ncaregivers must be aware that a baby’s brain is incredibly fragile, and that shaking a baby in a single moment of selfish\nfrustration could lead to their permanent injury, or death. If an awareness week saves even one life, or prevents even\none injury, then it is very much worth all of our effort.” \r\nSBS is a serious brain injury that often occurs when a frustrated caregiver “shakes” a child, usually to stop them from\ncrying. Veins, on and within the child’s brain, tear and bleed due to this shaking motion that then causes pressure on the\nbrain that leads to the destruction of brain tissue. The damaged brain then begins to swell which pushes down on the\nbrainstem that controls vital functions such as heart rate and breathing. If the swelling and pressure is not stopped, the\nchild will die. Symptoms range from mild forms of irritability, vomiting, breathing difficulties, to seizures and death. Twenty\nFive to 30 percent of SBS victims die because of their injuries, while survivors suffer from one or more impairments\nincluding permanent brain damage, deafness, and severe learning and behavioral problems. A sizeable number of\nAmericans remain unaware of SBS, which necessitates further education and discussion. \r\n\r\n###The Online Office of Congressman John B. Larson\nhttp://www.larson.house.gov Powered by Joomla! Generated: 3 September, 2009, 12:06"
} |
[
-0.05242229253053665,
0.01747104711830616,
0.05948275700211525,
0.054900966584682465,
0.05358158051967621,
-0.006664127577096224,
-0.039010584354400635,
-0.020734399557113647,
-0.04916246607899666,
0.00022049451945349574,
0.12290019541978836,
0.0554623119533062,
-0.018755653873085976,
0.033214669674634933,
-0.06093156337738037,
-0.012091257609426975,
0.078189916908741,
-0.04157969728112221,
-0.047836244106292725,
0.02007286064326763,
0.03260643035173416,
0.011547092348337173,
-0.01570393145084381,
0.02491571754217148,
-0.053010787814855576,
0.03192003071308136,
-0.08350440114736557,
-0.011799709871411324,
-0.02107013575732708,
-0.0037888784427195787,
-0.04965973272919655,
0.027123404666781425,
-0.007209439761936665,
0.04055364802479744,
0.07154221832752228,
-0.04135002940893173,
0.0330478698015213,
-0.0697748139500618,
0.10708198696374893,
0.06965092569589615,
0.03149643912911415,
-0.0560920387506485,
0.0003394796804059297,
-0.049985721707344055,
-0.013294671662151814,
-0.008966054767370224,
-0.025516699999570847,
0.009327487088739872,
-0.054122570902109146,
0.011976048350334167,
0.006759733892977238,
0.022144492715597153,
-0.03381388634443283,
0.07711518555879593,
-0.024952339008450508,
-0.05650273710489273,
0.022957678884267807,
-0.05095737427473068,
-0.04502803832292557,
0.007256944198161364,
-0.08399123698472977,
0.09389060735702515,
-0.061368368566036224,
0.012410253286361694,
-0.021018918603658676,
-0.020270176231861115,
-0.005912348162382841,
-0.019915293902158737,
0.026075178757309914,
0.0014875807100906968,
-0.0051498012617230415,
-0.04266225919127464,
0.12216947972774506,
0.03580151125788689,
-0.013296985067427158,
-0.06400652974843979,
0.03287876769900322,
0.04942719265818596,
0.03180054575204849,
-0.15445266664028168,
0.016777385026216507,
-0.040613651275634766,
0.07233588397502899,
-0.01294065173715353,
0.021245114505290985,
-0.030755357816815376,
-0.019889896735548973,
0.06208772957324982,
0.0882868617773056,
0.03752264752984047,
0.08227362483739853,
0.01417703740298748,
0.04194109886884689,
-0.004938311874866486,
-0.07311023771762848,
-0.003198856022208929,
0.011318045668303967,
0.08786605298519135,
-0.007821919396519661,
0.02630600333213806,
0.048043686896562576,
0.005177941173315048,
-0.12819209694862366,
-0.09241504967212677,
0.029989944770932198,
-0.06389454752206802,
-0.059127334505319595,
0.07214193046092987,
0.03308079019188881,
-0.010884277522563934,
-0.08946985006332397,
0.021128740161657333,
-0.0060610705986619,
-0.02807631529867649,
-0.06764712929725647,
0.09775356948375702,
-0.020602334290742874,
-0.010913103818893433,
0.08892229199409485,
-0.08061723411083221,
0.03607329726219177,
0.0024686260148882866,
0.01171057391911745,
-0.0436297208070755,
0.02227477915585041,
0.054418228566646576,
0.048930831253528595,
8.49743009361346e-34,
-0.017371268942952156,
-0.00697229104116559,
0.04683331772685051,
-0.06792453676462173,
0.020369023084640503,
-0.04066921025514603,
-0.010085048153996468,
-0.04212785139679909,
0.04062103480100632,
0.020913396030664444,
-0.08227329701185226,
0.03335515409708023,
-0.09852132201194763,
0.006034825928509235,
-0.026254042983055115,
-0.04791494831442833,
-0.016991008073091507,
-0.016515856608748436,
0.03309338912367821,
0.02156856283545494,
0.08299732953310013,
-0.08935827016830444,
-0.024587055668234825,
0.0012610218254849315,
-0.01577436551451683,
0.10846932232379913,
-0.0657707154750824,
-0.016751132905483246,
0.03861669450998306,
0.07446705549955368,
0.02958201803267002,
-0.0007473132573068142,
0.031828686594963074,
0.012076917104423046,
-0.030588947236537933,
-0.017880257219076157,
-0.04829607903957367,
-0.02566193975508213,
-0.023791752755641937,
-0.04730439931154251,
0.06748562306165695,
0.04524921253323555,
-0.004800055641680956,
0.02555539645254612,
0.06665102392435074,
-0.009601393714547157,
-0.020869055762887,
0.048149723559617996,
0.08526381850242615,
-0.046620696783065796,
0.033215951174497604,
0.009390215389430523,
0.04495706036686897,
0.03703909367322922,
-0.06311222910881042,
-0.04556955769658089,
0.001575295114889741,
-0.09418050199747086,
0.005643368232995272,
-0.02435760758817196,
0.0029347960371524096,
0.1210363358259201,
-0.0838666781783104,
0.010865230113267899,
-0.05651651322841644,
-0.0705719143152237,
-0.01753489300608635,
0.021792862564325333,
-0.05455978214740753,
-0.100600466132164,
0.028054729104042053,
-0.0030355092603713274,
0.0386686846613884,
0.003969971090555191,
-0.02845551259815693,
-0.04035969823598862,
0.07792605459690094,
-0.013475288636982441,
0.034614965319633484,
-0.05435709282755852,
-0.043193526566028595,
0.020115196704864502,
0.06356365233659744,
0.023719051852822304,
-0.01472229603677988,
-0.016510989516973495,
0.060638178139925,
0.06978750228881836,
0.08812537044286728,
0.061261773109436035,
-0.026749931275844574,
-0.004249470308423042,
0.012028947472572327,
0.020092559978365898,
0.05052293837070465,
-2.4381964234801727e-33,
0.010537609457969666,
-0.027833720669150352,
-0.049712080508470535,
0.015968890860676765,
-0.012304829433560371,
-0.026717744767665863,
0.027140328660607338,
0.0664360448718071,
0.11138284206390381,
-0.0638192668557167,
-0.007568003609776497,
-0.03964769467711449,
0.0182429701089859,
0.04762627184391022,
0.043631430715322495,
0.04392966255545616,
0.024459773674607277,
0.06510671973228455,
-0.04019857943058014,
-0.025792798027396202,
0.01052714604884386,
0.009067630395293236,
0.0026299457531422377,
0.10505811870098114,
-0.04664149880409241,
0.044535692781209946,
0.10774011164903641,
-0.0397440530359745,
0.029957164078950882,
-0.0634387955069542,
0.037623900920152664,
0.02027410827577114,
-0.006930600386112928,
0.11027812957763672,
-0.0795200914144516,
-0.06043394282460213,
0.005707324482500553,
-0.03555956110358238,
-0.06796972453594208,
0.02829376794397831,
0.054795145988464355,
0.00019699246331583709,
-0.048817314207553864,
0.09160955995321274,
-0.04970485717058182,
0.012684409506618977,
-0.035033829510211945,
-0.09910810738801956,
0.0012621122878044844,
-0.037925563752651215,
-0.04525996372103691,
0.024785909801721573,
-0.015148655511438847,
-0.006286857184022665,
-0.07500634342432022,
0.028411725535988808,
-0.014544800855219364,
-0.019943496212363243,
-0.0015549781965091825,
-0.0024427527096122503,
0.035485342144966125,
0.1366942971944809,
-0.029580043628811836,
-0.04360749572515488,
0.05093706399202347,
0.0166237223893404,
0.05399922654032707,
0.03129452094435692,
0.1500677764415741,
-0.07811322063207626,
0.027910204604268074,
-0.04863573610782623,
-0.13417848944664001,
-0.07861220836639404,
0.020457211881875992,
-0.030801402404904366,
-0.017977651208639145,
0.018193770200014114,
-0.04781902953982353,
0.01527661643922329,
0.05279797688126564,
0.01101409737020731,
-0.08545228838920593,
0.03296060487627983,
-0.03627616539597511,
-0.02715352550148964,
0.030621029436588287,
-0.010713091120123863,
-0.0017966198502108455,
0.030502134934067726,
-0.03173469752073288,
-0.05164523422718048,
-0.0950448289513588,
0.043982475996017456,
0.03193870559334755,
-5.521621204707117e-8,
0.008422457613050938,
-0.05601697415113449,
0.056728851050138474,
0.11730121821165085,
0.02465415745973587,
-0.05141052231192589,
-0.009051702916622162,
0.03967577964067459,
-0.062194813042879105,
-0.05975396931171417,
0.11003883928060532,
0.05758708342909813,
-0.004477015696465969,
-0.05288641154766083,
-0.06929675489664078,
-0.022015467286109924,
0.010979699902236462,
0.03661957010626793,
-0.06388381868600845,
-0.053763940930366516,
-0.128018319606781,
0.03300314024090767,
0.020182009786367416,
-0.08138646185398102,
-0.026697147637605667,
0.02206769771873951,
0.005241436418145895,
0.03735148534178734,
0.014066535979509354,
0.018947448581457138,
-0.038293011486530304,
0.037872351706027985,
-0.04340137168765068,
0.01131361909210682,
-0.009024398401379585,
-0.039603330194950104,
-0.06743480265140533,
-0.05107763409614563,
0.01008178573101759,
-0.021551255136728287,
-0.017143286764621735,
0.05100931227207184,
-0.04874241352081299,
0.05801032856106758,
0.08569149672985077,
-0.04142021760344505,
-0.08236925303936005,
-0.052581094205379486,
0.05229322612285614,
-0.042657528072595596,
-0.0007310364744625986,
-0.036524876952171326,
0.0022994810715317726,
0.02350112982094288,
-0.04874708503484726,
0.07760494947433472,
-0.02315438725054264,
-0.03585720434784889,
-0.07344019412994385,
-0.022119753062725067,
0.05166061967611313,
-0.09972963482141495,
0.03436800092458725,
0.11453640460968018
] | {
"pdf_file": "CIPZA5WZQ5JAE4AXBJTWO4PFGT7ORKB7.pdf",
"text": "58056 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 197 / Friday, October 12, 2007 / Notices \n1On August 30, 2006, the Department published \na notice of initiation for this administrative review covering the period July 1, 2005, through June 30, 2006. See Notice of Initiation of Antidumping and \nCountervailing Duty Administrative Reviews , 71 FR \n51573 (August 30, 2006). However, following the initiation, the Department has revoked this order effective May 4, 2006. See Furfuryl Alcohol from \nThailand; Final Results of the Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order and Revocation of the Order , 72 FR 9729 (March 5, \n2007). Therefore, the revised POR is now July 1, 2005 through May 3, 2006. Administration, International Trade \nAdministration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482 –3797. \nSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : \nBackground \nOn July 26, 2007, the Department of \nCommerce ( ‘‘the Department ’’) \npublished a preliminary notice of intent to rescind the antidumping duty new shipper review of certain frozen warm water shrimp from the People ’s \nRepublic of China ( ‘‘PRC’’) with respect \nto Maoming Changxing Foods Co., Ltd. (‘‘Maoming Changxing ’’), covering the \nperiod February 1, 2006, through July 31, 2007. See Certain Frozen \nWarmwater Shrimp from the People ’s \nRepublic of China: Preliminary Notice of Intent to Rescind Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review , 72 FR 41058 (July \n26, 2007). \nExtension of Time Limit of Final \nResults \nThe final results for this new shipper \nreview are currently due on October 17, 2007. Consistent with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended ( ‘‘Act’’) and 19 CFR \n351.214(i)(2), the Department is extending the time limit for the completion of the final results of this new shipper review by 60 days because the case is extraordinarily complicated. This new shipper review involves complicated ownership and affiliation issues which will require the Department to consider arguments by interested parties regarding the actual owners and the source of founding capital with respect to Maoming Changxing. In addition, the Department requires additional time to consider domestic producers ’ arguments \nregarding the antidumping duty rate to apply to Maoming Changxing. \nBecause of the complexity of issues in \nthis case, and in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(i)(2), we are extending the time period for issuing the final results of the new shipper review of Maoming Changxing by 60 days. Since a 60-day extension would result in the deadline for the final results falling on December 16, 2007, which is Sunday, the new deadline for the final results will be the next business day, December 17, 2007. See Notice of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next Business Day ’’ Rule for \nAdministrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended , 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). \nThis notice is published pursuant to \nsections 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and section 351.214(i)(2) of the \nDepartment ’s regulations. \nDated: October 4, 2007. \nStephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import \nAdministration. \n[FR Doc. E7 –20152 Filed 10 –11–07; 8:45 am] \nBILLING CODE 3510 –DS–S \nDEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE \nInternational Trade Administration \n[A–549–812] \nNotice of Final Results of Antidumping \nDuty Administrative Review: Furfuryl Alcohol from Thailand \nAGENCY : Import Administration, \nInternational Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. \nSUMMARY : On August 2, 2007, the \nDepartment of Commerce published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on furfuryl alcohol from Thailand. The period of review is July 1, 2005, through May 3, 2006. The final results do not differ from the preliminary results of this review, in which we found that sales of the subject merchandise have not been made below normal value. \nEFFECTIVE DATE : October 12, 2007. \nFOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : \nDamian Felton or Brandon Farlander, AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482 –0133 and (202) \n482–0182, respectively. \nSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : \nBackground \nOn July 25, 1995, the Department \npublished an antidumping duty order on furfuryl alcohol from Thailand. See \nFurfuryl Alcohol from Thailand: Notice of Amended Final Antidumping Duty Determination and Order , 60 FR 38035 \n(July 25, 1995). On August 30, 2006, the Department published a notice of initiation for this administrative review. See Notice of Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews , 71 FR 51573 (August 30, 2006). \nOn August 2, 2007, the Department published in the Federal Register its \npreliminary results of the administrative review of this order. See Furfuryl \nAlcohol from Thailand; Preliminary Results of 2005 –2006 Antidumping Duty \nAdministrative Review , 72 FR 42390 \n(August 2, 2007) ( ‘‘Preliminary \nResults ’’). In the Preliminary Results , \nthe Department invited interested parties to submit briefs and request a \nhearing. No briefs were received and the Department did not conduct a hearing because none was requested. \nScope of the Order \nThe merchandise covered by this \norder is furfuryl alcohol (C4H3OCH2OH). Furfuryl alcohol is a primary alcohol, and is colorless or pale yellow in appearance. It is used in the manufacture of resins and as a wetting agent and solvent for coating resins, nitrocellulose, cellulose acetate, and other soluble dyes. \nThe product subject to this order is \nclassifiable under subheading 2932.13.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of this proceeding is dispositive. \nPeriod of Review \nThe period of review ( ‘‘POR’’) is July \n1, 2005, through May 3, 2006.\n1 \nFinal Results of Review \nAs noted above, the Department \nreceived no comments concerning the Preliminary Results. Consistent with the Preliminary Results, we find that a de \nminimis (i.e. , less than 0.50 percent) \ndumping margin exists for Indorama Chemicals (Thailand) Ltd. during the \nPOR. Because no party submitted comments on the Preliminary Results \nand the Department has not made any changes to the Preliminary Results , we \nhave not prepared a Decision Memorandum for these final results. For further details of our findings, see the Preliminary Results . \nExporter/manufacturer Weighted–average \nmargin percentage \nIndorama Chemicals \n(Thailand) Ltd. ........... 0.39* \n*This is a de minimis rate. \nAssessment Rates \nThe Department has determined, and \nU.S. Customs and Border Protection (‘‘CBP’’) shall assess, antidumping \nduties on all appropriate entries covered by this review. The Department intends \nVerDate Aug<31>2005 16:35 Oct 11, 2007 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\\FR\\FM\\12OCN1.SGM 12OCN1jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES 58057 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 197 / Friday, October 12, 2007 / Notices \nto issue assessment instructions to CBP \n15 days after the publication date of these final results. Because the respondent did not report the entered value of its U.S. sales, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we have calculated importer –specific per –unit duty \nassessment rates by aggregating the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the examined sales and dividing this amount by the total quantity of those sales. To determine whether the duty assessment rates are de minimis , in accordance with the \nrequirement set forth in 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2), we calculated importer (or customer)-specific ad valorem ratios \nbased on the estimated entered value. Where an importer (or customer)- specific ad valorem rate is zero or de \nminimis , we will instruct CBP to \nliquidate appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. \nThe Department clarified its \n‘‘automatic assessment ’’ regulation on \nMay 6, 2003 (68 FR 23954). This \nclarification will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the period of review produced by reviewed companies for which these companies did not know their merchandise was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all – \nothers rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. For a full discussion of this clarification, see Antidumping and \nCountervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties , 68 \nFR 23954 (May 6, 2003). \nCash Deposit Rates \nOn March 5, 2007, pursuant to section \n751(d)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended ( ‘‘the Act ’’), and 19 CFR \n351.222(i)(1)(ii), the Department revoked the antidumping duty order on furfuryl alcohol from Thailand ( see \nFurfuryl Alcohol from Thailand; Final Results of the Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order and Revocation of the Order , 72 FR 9729 \n(March 5, 2007)). The effective date of the revocation is May 4, 2006. As a result of this action, the Department does not intend to issue cash deposit instructions. \nNotification to Importers \nThis notice serves as a final reminder \nto importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to \nliquidation of the relevant entries \nduring this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary ’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping \nduties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. \nNotification Regarding Administrative \nProtective Orders \nThis notice also serves as a reminder \nto parties subject to Administrative Protective Order ( ‘‘APO ’’) of their \nresponsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanctions. \nWe are issuing and publishing these \nresults and this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act. \nDated: October 14, 2007. \nDavid M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import \nAdministration. \n[FR Doc. E7 –20156 Filed 10 –11–07; 8:45 am] \nBILLING CODE 3510 –DS–S \nDEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE \nNational Oceanic and Atmospheric \nAdministration \nAvailability of Seats for the Cordell \nBank National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council \nAGENCY : National Marine Sanctuary \nProgram (NMSP), National Ocean Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Department of Commerce (DOC). \nACTION : Notice and request for \napplications. \nSUMMARY : The Cordell Bank National \nMarine Sanctuary (CBNMS or Sanctuary) is seeking applicants for the following vacant seats on its Sanctuary Advisory Council (Council): Education —Alternate . Applicants are \nchosen based upon their particular expertise and experience in relation to the seat for which they are applying; community and professional affiliations; philosophy regarding the protection and management of marine resources; and possibly the length of residence in the area affected by the Sanctuary. Applicants who are chosen as members should expect to serve 2 –3 year terms, \npursuant to the Council ’s Charter. \nDATES : Applications are due by \nNovember 1, 2007. ADDRESSES : Application kits may be \nobtained from Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuary, Rowena Forest, P.O. Box 159, Olema, CA 94950, and on the Cordell Bank Web site at: http:// \ncordellbank.noaa.gov . Completed \napplications should be sent to the above mailing address, or faxed to (415) 663 – \n0315. \nFOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT : \nRowena Forest/CBNMS, P.O. Box 159, Olema, CA 94950, (415) 663 –0314 x105, \nand Rowena.forest@noaa.gov . \nSUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION : The \nAdvisory Council for Cordell Bank was established in 2002 to support the joint management plan review process currently underway for the CBNMS and its neighboring sanctuaries, Gulf of the Farallones and Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuaries. The Council has members representing education, research, conservation, maritime activity, and community-at-large. The government seats are held by representatives from the National Marine Fisheries Service, the United States Coast Guard, and the managers of the Gulf of the Farallones, Monterey Bay and Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuaries. The Council holds four regular meetings per year, and one annual retreat. \nAuthority: 16 U.S.C. 1431, et seq. \n(Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog \nNumber 11.429 Marine Sanctuary Program) \nDated: October 2, 2007. \nDaniel J. Basta, Director, National Marine Sanctuary Program, \nNational Ocean Services, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. \n[FR Doc. 07 –5038 Filed 10 –11–07; 8:45 am] \nBILLING CODE 3510 –NK–M \nDEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE \nNational Oceanic and Atmospheric \nAdministration \nRIN 0648 –AW15 \nFisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of \nMexico, and South Atlantic; Amendment 2 to the Fishery Management Plan for the Queen Conch Fishery of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands \nAGENCY : National Marine Fisheries \nService (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. \nACTION : Notice; intent to prepare a draft \nenvironmental impact statement (DEIS); scoping meetings; request for comments. \nSUMMARY : The Caribbean Fishery \nManagement Council (Council) in \nVerDate Aug<31>2005 16:35 Oct 11, 2007 Jkt 214001 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\\FR\\FM\\12OCN1.SGM 12OCN1jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES"
} |
[
-0.04368605092167854,
0.05639643967151642,
-0.03510540723800659,
-0.00025290707708336413,
-0.059484951198101044,
0.02242111973464489,
-0.06921573728322983,
0.013585532084107399,
-0.06265046447515488,
-0.009400811977684498,
0.05778532475233078,
0.06026139110326767,
0.027245236560702324,
-0.04117991402745247,
-0.024539494886994362,
-0.004553007893264294,
0.0037337783724069595,
0.04292023926973343,
0.03724789619445801,
0.08298006653785706,
0.04722964018583298,
-0.009515387937426567,
-0.0951351672410965,
0.01710820570588112,
0.05779384821653366,
0.05399802699685097,
-0.07077231258153915,
-0.08355128765106201,
0.007823718711733818,
-0.06959858536720276,
-0.0026269135996699333,
0.004551701247692108,
-0.016527295112609863,
-0.04401729628443718,
0.16699396073818207,
-0.022331222891807556,
0.041407790035009384,
-0.014617348089814186,
0.011562916450202465,
-0.06459580361843109,
-0.003625319106504321,
-0.006824139039963484,
0.031674824655056,
-0.02637280896306038,
-0.07406977564096451,
-0.04431375488638878,
-0.02479572594165802,
0.030776169151067734,
-0.02628716081380844,
0.11344129592180252,
-0.0613451823592186,
-0.04414266347885132,
0.08245596289634705,
-0.001447346992790699,
-0.021208176389336586,
0.06358610838651657,
0.009644481353461742,
0.027917223051190376,
-0.022372186183929443,
-0.0030607846565544605,
0.03365158289670944,
0.054680924862623215,
-0.03695952519774437,
0.025034673511981964,
0.04138420522212982,
0.0178401917219162,
0.0859246477484703,
-0.005207466892898083,
-0.010999630205333233,
-0.08675194531679153,
0.13044795393943787,
-0.032798394560813904,
-0.03563506901264191,
0.03969329968094826,
-0.03185340762138367,
0.06642952561378479,
0.016638200730085373,
0.08104933798313141,
0.028285754844546318,
-0.010001235641539097,
-0.04187682271003723,
-0.06196841597557068,
-0.053470514714717865,
-0.04611426964402199,
-0.014180954545736313,
-0.017553040757775307,
-0.03741929307579994,
0.07224200665950775,
0.08366287499666214,
0.00570828840136528,
0.03874726966023445,
-0.006727294996380806,
0.05567704513669014,
-0.12896008789539337,
-0.07436351478099823,
-0.021198248490691185,
-0.05668961629271507,
-0.014532551169395447,
0.05469313636422157,
0.026400508359074593,
0.06309300661087036,
0.02003602124750614,
-0.003257894888520241,
-0.021659938618540764,
0.056697119027376175,
0.027480341494083405,
0.005419697146862745,
0.019122231751680374,
0.0029434077441692352,
-0.07522808760404587,
-0.033171944320201874,
0.01418896485120058,
0.08704916387796402,
-0.044173017144203186,
0.009803175926208496,
0.08193200826644897,
-0.0234000775963068,
0.021094806492328644,
0.03094550594687462,
-0.025212951004505157,
0.02549167536199093,
0.07807358354330063,
-0.05896923691034317,
-0.005874868482351303,
-0.04448620229959488,
0.044963181018829346,
-0.04476539418101311,
1.8282379149682572e-33,
0.08416958898305893,
-0.03392606973648071,
0.00433387840166688,
-0.06174609810113907,
0.09318515658378601,
-0.0488470196723938,
0.09465813636779785,
-0.06089816242456436,
-0.05363898351788521,
-0.00030610617250204086,
-0.0009546555229462683,
-0.018879279494285583,
-0.0037185177206993103,
-0.07576011121273041,
-0.10690437257289886,
-0.046389076858758926,
-0.00841185450553894,
-0.012625670060515404,
-0.06352031230926514,
0.033276718109846115,
0.060777485370635986,
-0.0356476791203022,
0.03158615902066231,
0.054220374673604965,
-0.04691287875175476,
-0.05163169279694557,
-0.02084304951131344,
-0.0008541888673789799,
-0.013554871082305908,
-0.003655490232631564,
0.0737404078245163,
0.04075697436928749,
0.08262649923563004,
0.053656332194805145,
0.07078548520803452,
0.04559831693768501,
-0.034208718687295914,
0.047452762722969055,
0.005792255979031324,
0.001766788656823337,
0.0243418887257576,
-0.006993621122092009,
-0.026961153373122215,
0.0006544920615851879,
0.01961085945367813,
-0.01599039137363434,
0.03783649578690529,
-0.007402730640023947,
0.044308099895715714,
-0.025264251977205276,
-0.02148098684847355,
0.00215060543268919,
-0.07493504136800766,
-0.04771922156214714,
0.0023906887508928776,
0.06261510401964188,
-0.05350860580801964,
-0.044111717492341995,
0.0269161406904459,
-0.04038707911968231,
0.04889257624745369,
0.01627201959490776,
-0.027384700253605843,
-0.06377381086349487,
-0.15322113037109375,
0.020341714844107628,
-0.031660716980695724,
0.024372145533561707,
0.004993246402591467,
-0.06288241595029831,
0.014887453988194466,
0.025869756937026978,
0.007262344937771559,
0.007880871184170246,
0.04315744340419769,
0.015105865895748138,
0.05315272510051727,
-0.04817579314112663,
-0.0005032893386669457,
-0.026484932750463486,
-0.037078049033880234,
0.029926065355539322,
0.09900613874197006,
0.10296227037906647,
0.018150823190808296,
0.07927761971950531,
0.04931843653321266,
-0.016562098637223244,
-0.08682519942522049,
-0.03989589586853981,
-0.020997226238250732,
-0.01229515764862299,
0.05910369008779526,
0.003282968420535326,
0.10205216705799103,
-3.383210862252765e-33,
0.015964746475219727,
-0.07970793545246124,
0.022682122886180878,
-0.04396628960967064,
-0.033067937940359116,
-0.10585194826126099,
-0.09969142824411392,
0.020840538665652275,
-0.04235287755727768,
-0.08456014841794968,
-0.10075265169143677,
0.0011010051239281893,
0.02431943081319332,
0.09776674211025238,
-0.09026574343442917,
0.04586942493915558,
0.036782603710889816,
-0.0624832920730114,
-0.03528792783617973,
-0.032339707016944885,
0.007510727271437645,
0.02722465619444847,
-0.006972158327698708,
0.033145591616630554,
-0.04643131420016289,
0.027075186371803284,
0.027752449735999107,
-0.08057471364736557,
0.06619570404291153,
-0.020473118871450424,
-0.029034586623311043,
-0.013044346123933792,
-0.01843874529004097,
0.03357689082622528,
0.03229412063956261,
-0.06336291134357452,
0.06202220171689987,
-0.033152490854263306,
0.014792891219258308,
-0.04915643110871315,
0.034654371440410614,
0.057077113538980484,
0.013782953843474388,
-0.010735037736594677,
0.066704660654068,
0.03669566661119461,
0.08925969153642654,
-0.07818825542926788,
0.04070861265063286,
0.010997801087796688,
-0.04578790441155434,
-0.03690771386027336,
0.01975334621965885,
0.11618703603744507,
0.022688398137688637,
0.0032185623422265053,
0.06213735044002533,
-0.04105772450566292,
-0.05533066764473915,
0.022386880591511726,
-0.02134106121957302,
0.10952246189117432,
-0.08279832452535629,
-0.011889978311955929,
0.030129048973321915,
-0.06520173698663712,
-0.08679605275392532,
-0.09068553894758224,
-0.01597447507083416,
-0.021691787987947464,
-0.037350624799728394,
-0.10266250371932983,
-0.013372032903134823,
-0.006403313018381596,
0.027974557131528854,
0.11242244392633438,
-0.03960120305418968,
0.00012750958558171988,
-0.06809006631374359,
-0.03000946156680584,
0.00454925699159503,
0.015727631747722626,
-0.09950080513954163,
0.06083308905363083,
-0.009882142767310143,
0.06084764003753662,
0.060105424374341965,
-0.10597328096628189,
0.06341494619846344,
0.05627046152949333,
-0.07927286624908447,
-0.04046802967786789,
0.00075844197999686,
0.07795853167772293,
0.005346996244043112,
-4.611324655456883e-8,
0.06879317760467529,
0.014144852757453918,
-0.06934984028339386,
0.029231267049908638,
0.051894668489694595,
0.002919229445978999,
0.08247623592615128,
-0.0381980799138546,
-0.013298477046191692,
0.015607206150889397,
0.04654424265027046,
0.013982710428535938,
-0.03658648952841759,
-0.06076928973197937,
-0.05099969729781151,
-0.038885440677404404,
0.0335046611726284,
0.005386109463870525,
0.012225402519106865,
0.015693269670009613,
-0.07433183491230011,
-0.016753749921917915,
0.019907262176275253,
0.02890186198055744,
-0.044868096709251404,
-0.038521915674209595,
-0.02103130891919136,
0.13688434660434723,
0.032984111458063126,
-0.0037947746459394693,
-0.056145407259464264,
0.06284379959106445,
0.019840937107801437,
-0.1279406100511551,
-0.004848376847803593,
0.031110329553484917,
-0.041100725531578064,
0.03200238570570946,
0.013369986787438393,
-0.026042930781841278,
0.00262829358689487,
0.04324493184685707,
0.04990790784358978,
0.01223297230899334,
0.06024300679564476,
-0.06507229804992676,
-0.07921942323446274,
-0.002241244539618492,
0.03786903992295265,
-0.04418007656931877,
-0.0450296625494957,
-0.07692903280258179,
0.05425526946783066,
0.017932912334799767,
0.06174096837639809,
0.07622339576482773,
0.06928002089262009,
0.03549196198582649,
-0.037271179258823395,
-0.02824072539806366,
0.06543130427598953,
-0.05341481789946556,
0.032162461429834366,
0.02149186097085476
] | {
"pdf_file": "ADYF6YEDFBWOGKPODVGYMTVM4VRY2C5K.pdf",
"text": "Published on United States Bankruptcy Court (http://www.canb.uscourts.gov )\nHome > Calendar for the Week of March 21, 2016\nCalendar for the Week of March 21, 2016\nFile Attachment: \n Calendar for the Week of March 21, 2016\nSource URL (modified on 03/24/2016 - 5:13pm):\nhttp://www.canb.uscourts.gov/judge/montali/calendar/calendar-week-march-21-2016"
} |
[
-0.07090204209089279,
0.09343165904283524,
0.034676242619752884,
-0.049320995807647705,
0.10501350462436676,
0.09101571142673492,
0.17961466312408447,
0.027329083532094955,
0.013334057293832302,
0.051976464688777924,
0.03749479725956917,
-0.07786597311496735,
0.11612521857023239,
-0.020319581031799316,
0.021622341126203537,
-0.07785838097333908,
0.014240211807191372,
0.03027406334877014,
-0.12193462997674942,
0.06175331026315689,
0.01323278620839119,
-0.004322455730289221,
-0.006661504041403532,
0.06775155663490295,
-0.026686571538448334,
-0.04507098346948624,
0.07096795737743378,
0.0047263167798519135,
0.04561476781964302,
0.0365043580532074,
0.04291899874806404,
0.03347497805953026,
-0.07715355604887009,
-0.04736187681555748,
0.05987711250782013,
-0.03285256773233414,
-0.15048721432685852,
-0.09051863104104996,
-0.08332813531160355,
0.022734928876161575,
-0.03813732787966728,
0.0196330975741148,
-0.059694088995456696,
0.04947102814912796,
-0.05517224967479706,
-0.041960470378398895,
-0.03658454120159149,
-0.001051711500622332,
-0.00006617628241656348,
0.02953873760998249,
0.03551279753446579,
0.044095445424318314,
-0.020521478727459908,
-0.0058504799380898476,
-0.015095666982233524,
-0.09917247295379639,
-0.08384715765714645,
-0.02572014555335045,
-0.07321732491254807,
0.043985579162836075,
-0.014129472896456718,
-0.015962766483426094,
-0.046170029789209366,
-0.009142646566033363,
-0.006963047664612532,
0.014310479164123535,
-0.029599379748106003,
0.027950681746006012,
-0.09952394664287567,
0.09475477039813995,
-0.035549961030483246,
-0.009531380608677864,
-0.03133973851799965,
0.048387352377176285,
-0.0042936126701533794,
0.008294530212879181,
0.06861648708581924,
0.06982961297035217,
-0.04199734330177307,
-0.09147002547979355,
-0.02086476795375347,
0.03800293803215027,
0.0016198854427784681,
-0.0149355074390769,
0.06011704355478287,
-0.08388248085975647,
-0.05061278119683266,
-0.047708019614219666,
0.10840515047311783,
-0.023058678954839706,
0.03124845027923584,
-0.018186718225479126,
0.025823479518294334,
-0.022624071687459946,
0.14544522762298584,
-0.02683498151600361,
-0.008583704009652138,
-0.0718497633934021,
0.04939093813300133,
0.031833358108997345,
-0.008742586709558964,
-0.04574810341000557,
0.08228008449077606,
0.03906332701444626,
-0.017515214160084724,
-0.03861166164278984,
-0.03366322070360184,
-0.016498012468218803,
0.05904247239232063,
0.04776652157306671,
0.01197013445198536,
-0.09496233612298965,
0.0778706818819046,
-0.026905208826065063,
0.024422861635684967,
0.03917449340224266,
-0.006314415950328112,
0.04687508940696716,
0.07679957151412964,
-0.006508768070489168,
0.013220367021858692,
0.04084204509854317,
-0.01961338520050049,
-0.04729693755507469,
-0.042279332876205444,
-0.045583177357912064,
0.02832096815109253,
8.538682965829615e-33,
0.02750602923333645,
-0.01933511719107628,
-0.018683623522520065,
-0.027633188292384148,
0.027839047834277153,
-0.014559593051671982,
-0.016860108822584152,
0.001815196592360735,
0.042400360107421875,
-0.012050618417561054,
-0.008754040114581585,
0.011535891331732273,
0.011263404041528702,
0.030250372365117073,
0.008814917877316475,
0.015330696478486061,
0.07617772370576859,
0.08838219940662384,
0.07422106713056564,
0.049070339649915695,
-0.058163974434137344,
-0.061453767120838165,
0.04224338382482529,
-0.016778388991951942,
-0.009740208275616169,
0.003383312141522765,
0.022511525079607964,
-0.07436395436525345,
-0.03693486377596855,
-0.0005314023583196104,
0.0850936695933342,
0.05174802616238594,
-0.02648726850748062,
-0.014661576598882675,
0.07150285691022873,
0.026091821491718292,
-0.04001433029770851,
0.03663916140794754,
-0.040887534618377686,
-0.0060263704508543015,
0.014732115902006626,
0.009552240371704102,
0.05415508151054382,
-0.022994497790932655,
-0.01539868675172329,
-0.07712966948747635,
0.08307123929262161,
0.016530675813555717,
-0.015764359384775162,
-0.0032617091201245785,
-0.019801802933216095,
0.004281097557395697,
0.009263522922992706,
0.010283667594194412,
0.008058889769017696,
-0.02437339350581169,
-0.09872301667928696,
0.08100707828998566,
0.06744778156280518,
-0.013529720716178417,
-0.01563761942088604,
-0.07475901395082474,
0.013683635741472244,
-0.041674885898828506,
-0.03782791271805763,
0.009498286992311478,
-0.06693749129772186,
-0.10531392693519592,
0.012563428841531277,
-0.0318559892475605,
-0.050377219915390015,
0.008402679115533829,
-0.0030182567425072193,
-0.02272634394466877,
-0.0021460861898958683,
-0.01250139344483614,
0.010756098665297031,
0.00639189500361681,
0.033779263496398926,
-0.014289460144937038,
-0.0771242007613182,
0.029563890770077705,
-0.032993849366903305,
-0.04496704414486885,
0.01680125668644905,
0.057744864374399185,
0.05922068655490875,
-0.049332473427057266,
-0.043353449553251266,
-0.022110510617494583,
0.028193555772304535,
-0.05376432090997696,
-0.013614161871373653,
-0.005208446178585291,
0.0667794719338417,
-1.0472001626895738e-32,
-0.12109014391899109,
0.03885778412222862,
0.0015186737291514874,
-0.06382828205823898,
-0.07024096697568893,
0.009900554083287716,
0.06485748291015625,
-0.028585214167833328,
-0.0032412123400717974,
-0.001725621405057609,
-0.04054969176650047,
0.006392777897417545,
-0.014325186610221863,
-0.06242004781961441,
-0.1185576543211937,
0.016066255047917366,
-0.04364754259586334,
-0.0257842019200325,
0.005386202596127987,
0.01255040243268013,
0.0063959104008972645,
0.07771147042512894,
0.021858900785446167,
0.04911576583981514,
0.039324067533016205,
0.025911400094628334,
-0.06413628160953522,
0.05420169234275818,
-0.024363873526453972,
-0.02103637158870697,
0.024581588804721832,
-0.05699613690376282,
-0.08006306737661362,
0.03653012588620186,
-0.000009123400559474248,
-0.15593022108078003,
0.0889766588807106,
0.09982498735189438,
-0.11829907447099686,
-0.02314268983900547,
0.09015829861164093,
-0.07653103023767471,
0.07119829207658768,
0.04689528048038483,
0.03005295991897583,
-0.09052439033985138,
0.024344099685549736,
-0.06547737121582031,
0.03093448281288147,
-0.02043970115482807,
0.014684880152344704,
-0.07545286417007446,
-0.012693596072494984,
0.14707030355930328,
-0.06363027542829514,
0.008978073485195637,
0.02003851719200611,
-0.021471433341503143,
-0.04202798381447792,
-0.030137818306684494,
0.07500407844781876,
0.06496473401784897,
-0.03170248493552208,
0.054418470710515976,
0.026888327673077583,
-0.014116202481091022,
-0.04352542385458946,
-0.035335030406713486,
0.0962548702955246,
-0.027493957430124283,
-0.08560528606176376,
-0.06448806077241898,
-0.058161865919828415,
-0.10261610895395279,
0.02536732517182827,
0.03773206099867821,
0.04184013977646828,
-0.045505885034799576,
-0.04674893990159035,
0.09004703164100647,
-0.019266348332166672,
-0.050345972180366516,
-0.05541011318564415,
0.05587490648031235,
-0.04315965995192528,
-0.08553504943847656,
0.0346204899251461,
0.0003532757982611656,
0.011293201707303524,
0.10582683235406876,
-0.06176118552684784,
0.047268934547901154,
-0.029969362542033195,
0.08355138450860977,
-0.02188066951930523,
-6.761355564322002e-8,
0.023067904636263847,
-0.017780130729079247,
-0.010720998980104923,
-0.0391852930188179,
0.019979052245616913,
-0.12728887796401978,
0.0017200823640450835,
-0.029101084917783737,
-0.021554170176386833,
-0.02021504007279873,
-0.0037034275010228157,
0.05028223618865013,
0.02800695411860943,
-0.005799536593258381,
-0.044282734394073486,
-0.028818480670452118,
-0.005649494007229805,
0.03230322524905205,
-0.02823105826973915,
0.045145850628614426,
0.011810949072241783,
0.007973787374794483,
-0.00990027841180563,
0.0031572163570672274,
-0.032986320555210114,
0.036943014711141586,
0.06383707374334335,
-0.010991518385708332,
0.004000140819698572,
-0.0012397314421832561,
-0.02666557766497135,
-0.01240569818764925,
0.06436058133840561,
-0.05449677258729935,
-0.04864528030157089,
-0.002893909579142928,
0.01896010711789131,
-0.007515340112149715,
0.06528884917497635,
0.01663735881447792,
0.042483918368816376,
-0.02865976095199585,
0.08494243770837784,
0.030080288648605347,
0.05521174147725105,
-0.061125487089157104,
-0.06057659909129143,
-0.06976252794265747,
-0.0019659455865621567,
-0.062254346907138824,
-0.027717161923646927,
0.001670532627031207,
0.06336209177970886,
0.05726248770952225,
0.033465445041656494,
-0.06268423795700073,
-0.009604351595044136,
0.021320641040802002,
-0.04182814806699753,
0.046235088258981705,
0.0511070154607296,
-0.038077596575021744,
0.01608845219016075,
-0.023465948179364204
] | {
"pdf_file": "7LAHAWE6SGPL25FWUGMRKXCMTD3CWEBO.pdf",
"text": "304.17 -220 Insurance with other insurers -- Expense incurred benefits -- \"Other \nvalid coverage.\" \n(1) There may be a provision as follows: \n \"Insurance with Other Insurers: If there be other valid coverage, not with this \ninsurer, providing benefits for the same loss on a provision of service basis or on an \nexpense incurred basis and of which this insurer has not been given written notice \nprior to the occurrence or commencement of loss, the only liability under any \nexpense incurred coverage of this policy shall be for such proportion of the loss as \nthe amount which would otherwise have been payable hereunder plus the total of \nthe like amounts under all such other valid coverages for the same loss of which this \ninsurer had notice bears to the total like amounts under all valid coverages for such \nloss, and for the return of such portion of the premiums paid as shall exceed the pro \nrata portion for the amount so determined. For the purpose of applying this \nprovision when other coverage is on a provision of service basis, the like amount of \nsuch other coverage shall be taken as the amount which the services rendered would \nhave cost in th e absence of such coverage.\" \n(2) If the foregoing policy provision is included in a policy which also contains the \npolicy provision set out in subsection (1) of KRS 304.17 -230, there shall be added \nto the caption of the foregoing provision the phrase \"... Expense Incurred Benefits.\" \n(3) The insurer may, at its option, include in the provision provided in subsection (1) of \nthis section, a definition of \"other valid coverage\" approved as to form by the \nexecutive director, which definition shall be limited i n subject matter to coverage \nprovided by organizations subject to regulation by insurance law or by insurance \nauthorities of this or any other state of the United States or any province of Canada, \nand by hospital or medical service organizations, and to any other coverage the \ninclusion of which may be approved by the executive director. In the absence of \nsuch definition such term shall not include group insurance, automobile medical \npayments insurance, or coverage provided by hospital or medical service \norganizations or by union welfare plans or employer or employee benefit \norganizations. For the purpose of applying such policy provision no third -party \nliability coverage amount of benefit provided for such insured pursuant to any \ncompulsory benefit statute, including any workers' compensation or employer's \nliability statute, whether provided by a governmental agency or otherwise, shall in \nall cases be deemed to be \"other valid coverage\" of which the insurer has had \nnotice. In applying such policy provision no third -party liability coverage shall be \nincluded as \"other valid coverage.\" \nEffective: June 18, 1970 \nHistory: Created 1970 Ky. Acts ch. 301, subtit. 17, sec. 22, effective June 18, 1970. \nLegislative Research Commission Note (6/20/2005). 2005 Ky. Acts chs. 11, 85, 95, 97, \n98, 99, 123, and 181 instruct the Reviser of Statutes to correct statutory references to \nagencies and officers whose names have been changed in 2005 legislation confirming \nthe reorganization of the executive branch. Such a correction ha s been made in this \nsection. "
} |
[
-0.030778370797634125,
-0.021408960223197937,
-0.06443789601325989,
0.06782889366149902,
0.06170421838760376,
0.0214085653424263,
0.05297389253973961,
-0.008315334096550941,
0.0043607670813798904,
0.008371937088668346,
-0.037756241858005524,
0.01623556762933731,
-0.04952213540673256,
-0.004601353779435158,
0.06898178905248642,
-0.03251705318689346,
0.08234826475381851,
0.029679307714104652,
-0.04273790493607521,
0.15361841022968292,
-0.02006714418530464,
-0.07878042012453079,
-0.044598694890737534,
0.04524197056889534,
-0.0029238692950457335,
-0.04255019128322601,
-0.06274901330471039,
-0.01885744370520115,
-0.08253578841686249,
0.008113803341984749,
-0.043994270265102386,
-0.016004053875803947,
0.031059667468070984,
0.005792185664176941,
0.11586401611566544,
0.055362164974212646,
0.019235892221331596,
0.09226687997579575,
0.03866587579250336,
0.017194116488099098,
-0.06002458184957504,
-0.032698191702365875,
0.041911084204912186,
-0.02205541916191578,
-0.033566322177648544,
-0.0017772153951227665,
0.0514925941824913,
0.016916334629058838,
-0.10176115483045578,
0.01099417731165886,
-0.011214335449039936,
-0.0057717375457286835,
0.008767323568463326,
0.02417750097811222,
-0.04832862317562103,
0.03959248960018158,
-0.02586645446717739,
-0.013212058693170547,
0.0005521913408301771,
0.045494623482227325,
-0.009084413759410381,
-0.00013642149860970676,
0.006083536893129349,
-0.007327476516366005,
0.048936985433101654,
0.01983335241675377,
-0.07862778753042221,
-0.03940277919173241,
0.06895223259925842,
-0.05520058795809746,
0.04414846748113632,
-0.03134535998106003,
-0.07222481071949005,
-0.0719912052154541,
-0.015103924088180065,
0.028662407770752907,
0.0019592551980167627,
0.046913255006074905,
0.07107771188020706,
-0.10729961097240448,
0.06644083559513092,
-0.02993607334792614,
0.023375824093818665,
-0.016150599345564842,
-0.0048604398034513,
-0.049267079681158066,
-0.013228380121290684,
-0.09045616537332535,
-0.07011450827121735,
0.005793091841042042,
0.08512919396162033,
-0.01295121293514967,
-0.03669121861457825,
0.015859505161643028,
0.06870513409376144,
-0.007283010985702276,
-0.03028644621372223,
-0.05145343393087387,
-0.013407777063548565,
0.03133756294846535,
0.008251139894127846,
0.0005245411884970963,
-0.019728392362594604,
-0.02537641115486622,
-0.02535281889140606,
-0.06254161149263382,
-0.019389282912015915,
-0.0410492904484272,
0.0009167161770164967,
-0.010499955154955387,
-0.006619596388190985,
0.08496208488941193,
0.018643159419298172,
0.026824401691555977,
-0.022298095747828484,
0.008472122251987457,
-0.11555106937885284,
-0.01794593781232834,
0.004237751476466656,
0.07330793142318726,
0.039682358503341675,
0.010610192082822323,
-0.04370167478919029,
0.016972068697214127,
0.03628631308674812,
0.030306827276945114,
-0.06335321068763733,
4.885659783206656e-33,
-0.08369950205087662,
0.07291615754365921,
-0.0008354843594133854,
-0.036766111850738525,
0.008535786531865597,
0.00037977020838297904,
0.07705571502447128,
-0.08898792415857315,
-0.012782159261405468,
0.03779498115181923,
0.026487112045288086,
0.10531887412071228,
-0.0029476431664079428,
0.003703818889334798,
-0.07338865101337433,
-0.09753049910068512,
-0.019702212885022163,
0.04392537474632263,
0.07688251882791519,
-0.01603037305176258,
0.05534916743636131,
0.058731559664011,
-0.0001830525725381449,
-0.09722312539815903,
0.08919595927000046,
-0.029750410467386246,
-0.09420058131217957,
0.026499878615140915,
0.02670799382030964,
0.05176723748445511,
-0.035588011145591736,
0.10682766139507294,
0.024156415835022926,
-0.01636608876287937,
-0.03432638198137283,
-0.05511283874511719,
0.037671539932489395,
-0.07925788313150406,
0.012939243577420712,
0.0058440896682441235,
-0.03946506977081299,
0.08752269297838211,
0.04015115648508072,
0.05295778810977936,
-0.029336102306842804,
0.0450146347284317,
0.053089965134859085,
0.1279929131269455,
-0.0053185513243079185,
-0.04779031500220299,
0.04723292216658592,
-0.029001856222748756,
-0.10678168386220932,
-0.0075924452394247055,
0.00573407718911767,
-0.03776568919420242,
-0.05236397683620453,
-0.06601376831531525,
-0.014145584776997566,
-0.0036844019778072834,
0.061842016875743866,
0.04348335042595863,
-0.06662040203809738,
-0.016663460060954094,
-0.06925785541534424,
0.07455641031265259,
0.05863754451274872,
0.02920566126704216,
-0.04697837680578232,
0.038016002625226974,
-0.03130321577191353,
0.019801300019025803,
-0.011539017781615257,
0.03357585147023201,
-0.003061385126784444,
-0.09691698104143143,
0.09825339168310165,
0.08346375077962875,
0.04565208777785301,
-0.06716613471508026,
0.01821870170533657,
-0.015265574678778648,
0.07930583506822586,
0.03773906081914902,
0.025199996307492256,
-0.01889627054333687,
-0.022843919694423676,
-0.0578945018351078,
0.04225955531001091,
-0.049851782619953156,
0.06680792570114136,
-0.04480886831879616,
-0.003427765564993024,
0.08021319657564163,
-0.0219332966953516,
-5.6956080843598444e-33,
-0.01890682615339756,
-0.08970533311367035,
-0.04611993208527565,
0.039935797452926636,
-0.08411987870931625,
0.015046104788780212,
-0.01896931417286396,
-0.019838662818074226,
0.12115415930747986,
-0.02198517508804798,
0.06303487718105316,
-0.059573858976364136,
-0.06768602877855301,
0.0012390498304739594,
-0.05578967183828354,
-0.13548089563846588,
-0.02144014835357666,
-0.04662959277629852,
0.06510631740093231,
-0.021463267505168915,
0.04857217147946358,
-0.03470752760767937,
0.007979738526046276,
-0.012976947240531445,
0.05622924119234085,
-0.014006853103637695,
-0.08115321397781372,
-0.01955856755375862,
0.03591570258140564,
0.02990502119064331,
-0.030279578641057014,
0.02461531013250351,
-0.0266377292573452,
0.004373361822217703,
-0.04388172924518585,
0.017264464870095253,
0.03000662848353386,
-0.12579157948493958,
-0.01279962994158268,
0.062102727591991425,
0.05649444833397865,
-0.006792127154767513,
0.05604812502861023,
-0.007645601872354746,
0.007241262122988701,
-0.016439901664853096,
0.05320902168750763,
0.07127334922552109,
0.10076547414064407,
-0.031041288748383522,
-0.025701947510242462,
-0.06120198965072632,
-0.029835294932127,
0.015596969984471798,
-0.08592051267623901,
0.029098816215991974,
0.04505428671836853,
-0.000589129573199898,
-0.014306280761957169,
0.0063611287623643875,
0.004651399329304695,
0.07806941121816635,
-0.01803317852318287,
0.009219082072377205,
0.041215598583221436,
0.05471044033765793,
-0.03337346762418747,
-0.032712437212467194,
0.10458717495203018,
0.004060553386807442,
0.11676259338855743,
-0.13962580263614655,
0.0032662523444741964,
0.008794254623353481,
0.00273069622926414,
0.09357661008834839,
-0.011933687143027782,
-0.042510390281677246,
0.002819725777953863,
0.07040725648403168,
0.05426163971424103,
0.04379335790872574,
-0.03938540443778038,
-0.05021856352686882,
0.05210897698998451,
0.037106286734342575,
-0.041752755641937256,
0.0037908803205937147,
-0.018677586689591408,
0.02465103380382061,
-0.014189786277711391,
-0.08119464665651321,
0.15570169687271118,
-0.00281668733805418,
-0.01048242300748825,
-5.7503815042991846e-8,
-0.027690110728144646,
0.035111356526613235,
-0.05399271100759506,
0.02285292185842991,
-0.019519932568073273,
-0.04239350184798241,
0.032399967312812805,
-0.06393728405237198,
-0.04024634137749672,
-0.006423039361834526,
0.06561575829982758,
0.10357993096113205,
-0.04722955450415611,
-0.05855795741081238,
-0.10548591613769531,
-0.02375318668782711,
-0.07414042949676514,
-0.08398319035768509,
0.03772785887122154,
0.028226027265191078,
0.04171919450163841,
0.0484732948243618,
0.004055659752339125,
-0.025586847215890884,
-0.021087296307086945,
-0.03015660122036934,
0.0576903261244297,
0.09622684121131897,
0.0010123017709702253,
0.029314352199435234,
-0.037634264677762985,
-0.027152199298143387,
0.023790521547198296,
0.011583426035940647,
-0.01760430447757244,
0.041740018874406815,
-0.0342964231967926,
0.05632306635379791,
0.03561928868293762,
0.05764017254114151,
-0.0026263047475367785,
-0.06294242292642593,
-0.04386521875858307,
-0.04571567848324776,
0.011932417750358582,
-0.010003671981394291,
-0.004791308660060167,
0.010498289950191975,
0.07691104710102081,
-0.12378575652837753,
0.01661546528339386,
0.0098040122538805,
-0.023489825427532196,
0.0006219279603101313,
-0.010641132481396198,
0.025369782000780106,
-0.07553592324256897,
0.06404520571231842,
-0.04215272143483162,
-0.058407481759786606,
-0.08608458936214447,
-0.07592595368623734,
0.013254459947347641,
0.01357311476022005
] | {
"pdf_file": "VW5XCU675OPZSENKRKDCYOIGFKI7IJ42.pdf",
"text": "17 \nRALPH S. SAUL\n \nPhone: \nFax: \nRECEIVED \nJUL 01 2013 \nOFFICE OFTHESECRETARVJune 25, 2013 \nMs. Elizabeth M. Murphy \nSecretary \nSecurities and Exchange Commission \n100 F Street, N.E. \nWashington, DC 20549-1090 \nRe: File #S7-03-13 \nDear Ms. Murphy: \nAt the outset I want to congratulate the Commission for its thoughtful \nproposal relating to money market funds. The proposal demonstrates the \nimportance ofdelegating to the Commission with its wealth of experience in the \nsecurities markets the task of money market fund reformation. The FSOC has \nwisely accepted the wisdom of this approach. \nI have only one observation and it relates to government securities money\n \nmarket funds. This part of the proposal rests on the assumption that short-term\n \ngovernment securities will retain their value under most circumstances.\n \nHowever, changes in Federal Reserve policies have demonstrated that short-term\n \ngovernment securities may be subject to sharp changes in value. I wonder if\n \nthis possibility changes any of the Commission's views on government securities\n \nmoney market funds.\n "
} |
[
-0.04579079896211624,
0.07282616198062897,
-0.03449520096182823,
-0.011824868619441986,
-0.03956993669271469,
0.11088326573371887,
0.045059237629175186,
0.01922965794801712,
0.07867646962404251,
0.054854825139045715,
0.048129335045814514,
0.019433187320828438,
0.001114687416702509,
-0.00806549284607172,
-0.0380183644592762,
0.04606765881180763,
0.03892221674323082,
0.00028256402583792806,
-0.04065127298235893,
0.05849382281303406,
-0.01219253707677126,
0.03092074580490589,
-0.061536408960819244,
0.030907198786735535,
0.025064336135983467,
-0.07908757030963898,
-0.08804363757371902,
-0.00440506637096405,
-0.02639327198266983,
-0.0267229825258255,
-0.013176518492400646,
0.07949015498161316,
0.004953247029334307,
-0.016064241528511047,
0.07417241483926773,
0.021543122828006744,
0.009647506289184093,
-0.061494965106248856,
0.015054531395435333,
0.011723118834197521,
0.021238241344690323,
0.009618844836950302,
-0.052991922944784164,
-0.0053575048223137856,
-0.027608923614025116,
0.006667597685009241,
0.014988094568252563,
0.007414838299155235,
-0.11392340809106827,
0.04332418367266655,
-0.029120787978172302,
0.04018646106123924,
0.05073979124426842,
-0.03340964391827583,
-0.06845234334468842,
0.019104940816760063,
0.06672603636980057,
0.031962908804416656,
0.02734297513961792,
-0.027702227234840393,
0.000973447342403233,
-0.07140956819057465,
-0.08712233603000641,
0.07633639127016068,
0.026476608589291573,
0.005084725096821785,
0.0076739611104130745,
-0.04615084454417229,
0.009188800118863583,
-0.04870639368891716,
0.1141505241394043,
0.00894371047616005,
-0.004769079387187958,
-0.031846679747104645,
-0.02102062851190567,
0.008951298892498016,
0.0688299760222435,
0.05417654663324356,
0.04916214197874069,
-0.11422987282276154,
0.047754980623722076,
-0.10489025712013245,
-0.07856941968202591,
-0.054885588586330414,
0.005356762558221817,
-0.033939607441425323,
0.012293591164052486,
0.01868385449051857,
0.06876106560230255,
0.07081355154514313,
0.11272435635328293,
-0.012772397138178349,
0.03144470602273941,
-0.07994411885738373,
0.011259229853749275,
-0.0626571774482727,
-0.031388070434331894,
-0.010698075406253338,
-0.011053638532757759,
0.07217790931463242,
0.027772627770900726,
0.05478271469473839,
-0.02457668073475361,
-0.10467702150344849,
0.027144739404320717,
-0.08517340570688248,
-0.0018620897317305207,
0.009885133244097233,
-0.039425432682037354,
-0.039590172469615936,
-0.02166193351149559,
-0.010273873805999756,
0.09833748638629913,
0.03288579732179642,
0.023816216737031937,
0.0972951352596283,
0.049906834959983826,
0.0030070452485233545,
0.05744168907403946,
-0.09957993775606155,
0.059477269649505615,
0.05121076479554176,
-0.11578302085399628,
-0.00008216995047405362,
-0.080471470952034,
-0.018972767516970634,
-0.04805932939052582,
5.869362679800687e-33,
0.012606781907379627,
0.01193255465477705,
-0.02925022318959236,
-0.07701720297336578,
0.010541691444814205,
-0.05237341299653053,
0.023712966591119766,
-0.044486284255981445,
-0.021946685388684273,
-0.0564604289829731,
-0.015648312866687775,
-0.024195000529289246,
0.06525416672229767,
-0.02409435622394085,
-0.11613002419471741,
0.09165496379137039,
-0.04434739425778389,
0.026233602315187454,
-0.0231013223528862,
-0.03711117431521416,
0.03168027102947235,
0.026045752689242363,
-0.04472861811518669,
0.03368904069066048,
-0.11423411965370178,
-0.09482290595769882,
-0.004499094560742378,
-0.028779685497283936,
-0.05397852510213852,
0.002883188659325242,
0.002515692263841629,
0.06164269521832466,
0.12732253968715668,
0.06015484780073166,
0.10618118196725845,
0.043810173869132996,
0.027126941829919815,
-0.011886526830494404,
0.01078740693628788,
0.03062514029443264,
-0.003393681952729821,
0.05655466392636299,
0.04113162308931351,
0.01586129330098629,
-0.006179708521813154,
-0.022550053894519806,
-0.0347304493188858,
-0.040682267397642136,
-0.00322087574750185,
0.05325790122151375,
0.0023520661052316427,
0.04283211752772331,
0.04491143673658371,
0.016646916046738625,
-0.050991445779800415,
-0.01198972575366497,
-0.0387394055724144,
-0.0008814256289042532,
0.03391890227794647,
0.026108508929610252,
0.03982546553015709,
0.10746368765830994,
-0.08864307403564453,
0.01937282457947731,
-0.12120196968317032,
-0.008864949457347393,
-0.02224019542336464,
-0.013021722435951233,
0.0030152315739542246,
-0.09294905513525009,
0.0265547763556242,
-0.03074060007929802,
0.0884164571762085,
0.005909118335694075,
-0.013758981600403786,
-0.03164760768413544,
-0.007020914927124977,
0.026548238471150398,
0.010417746379971504,
-0.059767693281173706,
-0.07387028634548187,
0.026456065475940704,
0.008651037700474262,
-0.005575655493885279,
0.04493856057524681,
-0.03436190262436867,
0.03441634029150009,
-0.12864546477794647,
0.0033918702974915504,
0.0037114291917532682,
0.03238840401172638,
0.01730652153491974,
0.021245384588837624,
0.04968491941690445,
0.048107292503118515,
-6.272278429566396e-33,
-0.05682315304875374,
-0.05442289635539055,
-0.03730904683470726,
0.015600358135998249,
-0.04445032775402069,
-0.016897471621632576,
-0.050986867398023605,
-0.08753658831119537,
0.02840401791036129,
-0.07832979410886765,
-0.056280143558979034,
-0.017754795029759407,
0.01948399282991886,
0.04322824254631996,
0.012216057628393173,
-0.007181408815085888,
0.039960116147994995,
-0.06664393097162247,
-0.03772995248436928,
0.0038883965462446213,
0.12050418555736542,
0.005324200261384249,
0.012230235151946545,
0.060884274542331696,
-0.05875684693455696,
0.05076611787080765,
0.09740789979696274,
-0.06567689776420593,
0.045762985944747925,
0.003414002014324069,
-0.05019708722829819,
-0.07756610214710236,
-0.08982289582490921,
0.07788922637701035,
0.008514626882970333,
-0.03361152112483978,
0.1662413626909256,
-0.019755296409130096,
-0.09391818195581436,
0.02507900819182396,
0.017145464196801186,
-0.0179816372692585,
-0.02665615826845169,
-0.005897661205381155,
0.03406265005469322,
-0.03874143213033676,
0.07476735860109329,
-0.10281044244766235,
-0.008121582679450512,
-0.07969961315393448,
-0.03665824979543686,
-0.03222779184579849,
0.040663525462150574,
0.08841527998447418,
-0.04876222833991051,
-0.04823700338602066,
0.0774635449051857,
-0.03468259796500206,
-0.03530275821685791,
0.03095562383532524,
0.048637356609106064,
0.08035147190093994,
-0.056609153747558594,
0.000857778824865818,
0.06548002362251282,
-0.013511927798390388,
-0.03231404349207878,
-0.08476950973272324,
0.0007621954428032041,
-0.025694934651255608,
-0.06754625588655472,
-0.02054075337946415,
-0.08607804030179977,
-0.10830522328615189,
0.00627150246873498,
0.11957232654094696,
-0.025666164234280586,
0.01824718527495861,
-0.06824007630348206,
0.015482687391340733,
0.01832723617553711,
-0.005160209257155657,
0.010413947515189648,
0.058413829654455185,
0.017423640936613083,
0.04948240891098976,
0.014157568104565144,
-0.10431153327226639,
-0.006076879799365997,
0.06078937649726868,
-0.02894703298807144,
-0.014133135788142681,
0.08746650069952011,
0.04345084726810455,
-0.01113496720790863,
-6.209303649029607e-8,
0.01345208752900362,
-0.003693562000989914,
0.0007401691400445998,
0.07350834459066391,
0.03146500512957573,
-0.028615009039640427,
0.05420929938554764,
-0.0029585305601358414,
-0.05777016654610634,
0.12079386413097382,
0.01833757944405079,
0.031703509390354156,
-0.00458673806861043,
-0.03908153623342514,
-0.07975108176469803,
-0.04934832081198692,
-0.004277423955500126,
-0.026646334677934647,
-0.03469569608569145,
0.011701123788952827,
-0.043640151619911194,
0.021509092301130295,
-0.03216763585805893,
-0.045387621968984604,
-0.012120467610657215,
-0.02152366191148758,
0.011485418304800987,
0.05760285258293152,
0.022140411660075188,
-0.004908251576125622,
-0.07201823592185974,
0.03601108491420746,
-0.026971759274601936,
-0.05618556961417198,
-0.022054895758628845,
-0.06553111970424652,
0.016455626115202904,
0.07751993834972382,
0.003378750989213586,
0.08607853949069977,
0.001757395570166409,
0.026159102097153664,
0.007867040112614632,
0.05533967912197113,
0.060847342014312744,
-0.05925903096795082,
-0.10648208111524582,
-0.0047552878968417645,
0.029382461681962013,
-0.004562441725283861,
0.09425979107618332,
-0.0704692080616951,
0.02136707305908203,
0.019332662224769592,
0.027109861373901367,
0.0063960496336221695,
0.036919448524713516,
-0.0015501691959798336,
-0.032809458673000336,
0.024685634300112724,
0.06364420056343079,
0.0038719987496733665,
0.01971404254436493,
-0.01252694707363844
] | {
"pdf_file": "WIXGOEH55ET7IKPZ7WA63JSQT6HB4PJR.pdf",
"text": "MINUTES FOR THE CO URT OF APPEAL \nSTATE OF CALIFORNIA \nSECOND APPELLA TE DISTRICT \n \nAugust 31, 2006 \n \n DIVISION ONE\n \n B175215 Vernel Shaw (Not for Publication) v. \n Universal Studios, Inc. \n \nThe judgment is affirmed with respect to Shaw’s retaliation claim. The \njudgment is reversed with respect to Shaw’s discrimination claim. Shaw \nshall recover his costs on appeal. \n R o t h s c h i l d , J . \n \n We concur: Mallano, Acting P.J. Vogel (Miriam A.), J. B186022 Michael Berlin (Not for Publication) v. \n Pacific Western Bank \n \nThe judgment is affirmed. Re spondent(s) to recover costs. \n R o t h s c h i l d , J . \n We concur: Mallano, Acting P.J. \n Vogel (Miriam A.), J. August 31, 2006 (Continued) \nDIVISION ONE (Continued) \n B187723 Los Angeles County, D.C. S. (Not for Publication) \n v. \n Precilla O., \n M.F. \nThe order is affirmed. \n R o t h s c h i l d , J . \n We concur: Mallano, Acting P.J. \n Vogel (Miriam A.), J. DIVISION TWO\n \n B185017 People (Not for Publication) \n v. \n Morales \nThe judgment is modified to strike the section 12022, subdivision (a)(1) \nprincipal armed enhancement on count 3, to stay the senten ce for robbery in \ncount 3 pursuant to section 654, and to reflect a consecutive term of one \nyear eight months for carjacking in co unt 2 and a total se ntence of 16 years \neight months. The trial court is directed to correct the minute order of \nsentencing to delete the reference to a section 12022, subdivision (a)(1) \nenhancement on count 1. The trial court is further directed to prepare a new abstract of judgment reflecting this correction as well as the modifications \nto the judgment set forth herein, and to forward the amended abstract of \njudgment to the Department of Corre ctions. In all other respects, the \njudgment is affirmed. \n B o r e n , P . J . We concur: Doi Todd, J. Ashmann-Gerst, J. \n August 31, 2006 (Continued) \nDIVISION THREE \n B189544 Los Angeles County, D.C. S. (Not for Publication) \n v. \n Laura C. \n \nThe order terminating pare ntal rights is affirmed. \n K l e i n , P . J . We concur: Croskey, J. \n Aldrich, J. \n B182901 Farm Raised Salmon Cases (Certified for Publication) \n \nThe judgment is affirmed. The defend ants are entitled to recover their costs \non appeal. \n \n C r o s k e y , J . We concur: Klein, P.J. Aldrich, J. \nB188649 Los Angeles County, D.C. S. (Not for Publication) \n v. Yolanda F. \nThe order from which Mother has appealed is affirmed. \n \n C r o s k e y , J . \n We concur: Klein, P.J. Aldrich, J. August 31, 2006 (Continued) \nDIVISION FOUR \n B184142 Moatazedi v. \n Bostajani \n \nFiled order denying petiti on for rehearing. \n B177455 Costanza v. \n Simon Equipment Co., Inc., et al. \n \nFiled order denying petiti on for rehearing. \n DIVISION FIVE\n \n \nB190624 In re: Jeremiah F (Not for Publication) \n v. Los Angeles County, D.C.S. Shawn B. \nThe judgment is reversed. \n \n T u r n e r , P . J . \n We concur: Armstrong, J. K r i e g l e r , J . \nB190566 In re: Victor G. (Not for Publication) \n v. Los Angeles County, D.C.S. Jennifer G. \nThe judgment is reversed. \n \n T u r n e r , P . J . \n We concur: Armstrong, J. K r i e g l e r , J . August 31, 2006 (Continued) \nDIVISION FIVE (Continued) \n B187538 People (Not for Publication) v. \n Tiffany Mizrahi \n \nThe judgment is affirmed. \n K r i e g l e r , J . We concur: Turner, P.J. \n Mosk, J. \n B187866 People (Not for Publication) v. Bennie C. \nThe judgment is affirmed. \n Armstrong, J. We concur: Turner, P.J. Mosk, J. \n \nDIVISION EIGHT\n \n B183523 People (Not for Publication) v. Murry \n \nAppellant's conviction is affirmed. The case is remanded for resentencing, \nin accordance with the vi ews expressed herein. \n F l i e r , J . We concur: Cooper, P.J. \n B o l a n d , J . \n August 31, 2006 (Continued) \nDIVISION EIGHT (Continued) \n B182153 Hightower, (Certified for Publication) v. \n Roman catholic Bishop of Sacramento, \n \nFor the reasons set forth above, the j udgment is affirmed. Respondent to \nrecover its costs on appeal. \n R u b i n , J . \n We concur: Cooper, P.J. \n Flier, J. B174750 Larry D. Lyon, as Trustee, etc., (Not for Publication) \nB178964 v. Clifton C. Bearden, as Trustee, etc., \n \nThe appeal is dismissed and the case is remanded for further proceedings \nthat are consistent with this opinion. The parties are to bear their own costs \non appeal. \n F l i e r , J . \n We concur: Ru bin, Acting P.J. \n B o l a n d , J . B186645 People (Not for Publication) v. \n Morris \n \nThe judgment is affirmed. \n B o l a n d , J . We concur: Cooper, P.J. \n Rubin, J. \n August 31, 2006 (Continued) \nDIVISION EIGHT (Continued) \n B181683 People (Not for Publication) v. \n Steven H. \n \nProbation condition 15 is modified to read, \"Do not associate with anyone \nknown to you to be a member of any ga ng. 'Gang' is defi ned by Penal Code \nsection 186.22, subdivision (f).\" Pr obation condition 15A is modified to \nread, \"Do not participate in any type of activity known to you to be \nconducted by members of any gang or re lated to any gang. Do not wear \nclothing or insignia or obtain tattoos known to you to be related to any \ngang. 'Gang' is defined by Penal Code section 186.2 2, subdivision (f).\" In \nall other respects, the judgment is affirmed. \n \n B o l a n d , J . We concur: Cooper, P.J. \n Flier, J. \n B185930 People (Not for Publication) v. Schmidt \nThe judgment is affirmed. \n B o l a n d , J . We concur: Ru bin, Acting P.J. \n Flier, J. \n \n B187997 Ayala (Not for Publication) v. Los Angeles City College \nThe judgment (order of dismissal) is affirmed. \n \n C o o p e r , P . J . We concur: Boland, J. Flier, J. August 31, 2006 (Continued) \nDIVISION EIGHT (Continued) \n B184108 People (Not for Publication) v. \n O'Rise \n \nThe judgment is reversed and the ca use remanded for sentencing on count \n2. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed. \n \n B o l a n d , J . \n \n We concur: Cooper, P.J. \n Flier, J. B179461 Aoyagi et al., (Not for Publication) v. Mancini & Associates et al., \n \nThe judgment is affirmed. Re spondents are entitled to costs. \n C o o p e r , P . J . We concur: Rubin, J. B o l a n d , J . \n \n B187939 People (Not for Publication) v. Douglas, Jr., \nThe case is remanded to trial court for the court to correct the abstract of \njudgment to reflect a total four year term and forward a co py to the proper \nprison authorities. In all other respects the judgment is affirmed. \n C o o p e r , P . J . We concur: Boland, J. \n Flier, J. \n August 31, 2006 (Continued) \nDIVISION EIGHT (Continued) \n B186311 People (Not for Publication) v. \n Muhammad G., \n \nThe judgment is affirmed. \n R u b i n , J . We concur: Cooper, P.J. \n B o l a n d , J . \n B185906 People (Not for Publication) v. Jones \nThe order for reimbursement of probation costs is reversed. \n Rubin, Acting P.J. We concur: Boland, J. Flier, J. \n \nB186925 People (Not for Publication) v. Cardenas \nThe judgment is affirmed. \n \n R u b i n , J . We concur: Cooper, P.J. Flier, J. August 31, 2006 (Continued) \nDIVISION EIGHT (Continued) \n B180513 People (Not for Publication) v. \n Foster \n \nThe judgment is reversed and the matter is remanded for retrial on the \nmurder, attempted murder, and robbe ry charges only. Appellant's \nconviction for possession of a ja ilhouse shank is affirmed. \n Rubin, Acting P.J. \n \n We concur: Boland, J. Flier, J. B188376 People (Not for Publication) v. \n Velez \n \nThe judgment is modified to reflect a consecutive Penal code section 667, subdivision (a)(1) prior serious felony enhancement for count 2. In all \nother respects, the judgment is affirmed. \n B o l a n d , J . \n \n We concur: Cooper, P.J. Rubin, J. "
} |
[
-0.0469987653195858,
-0.06560181826353073,
0.0509001798927784,
-0.02526986226439476,
-0.012747255153954029,
0.07232233881950378,
0.03587224334478378,
0.011388534680008888,
0.04925307631492615,
0.058687034994363785,
0.05060696601867676,
0.08147844672203064,
0.01869504153728485,
-0.021596385166049004,
-0.03695547580718994,
0.01621939428150654,
0.07458443194627762,
0.029409045353531837,
-0.03268076851963997,
0.13708056509494781,
0.04447020962834358,
-0.05916096270084381,
0.005793760996311903,
-0.052914880216121674,
-0.03951375186443329,
-0.016051335260272026,
-0.11008866876363754,
0.028299150988459587,
-0.048275843262672424,
-0.05324821174144745,
0.030650470405817032,
-0.007950382307171822,
0.04535888880491257,
0.028924355283379555,
0.05457035452127457,
-0.011187197640538216,
0.06232548877596855,
0.014307775534689426,
-0.002942031715065241,
-0.031048154458403587,
0.03411301597952843,
-0.004037979058921337,
0.01766016334295273,
0.01720629446208477,
-0.0791110247373581,
-0.07473242282867432,
0.019482353702187538,
-0.07223380357027054,
-0.0337526798248291,
-0.08414212614297867,
-0.07446464896202087,
-0.018850957974791527,
0.02739671617746353,
0.015938857570290565,
-0.011315954849123955,
0.010115656070411205,
0.027967020869255066,
0.040672507137060165,
-0.004541903734207153,
-0.021994661539793015,
-0.010363583452999592,
0.01700282283127308,
-0.01401577703654766,
-0.010139890015125275,
0.06450985372066498,
-0.006512303836643696,
-0.054661575704813004,
-0.032520852982997894,
-0.0053830696269869804,
0.022198297083377838,
-0.06554854661226273,
0.03802787885069847,
-0.01571645215153694,
0.004831432364881039,
0.0338163860142231,
-0.02771844156086445,
0.06446319818496704,
0.09320557117462158,
0.06686802953481674,
-0.05067666620016098,
-0.019950658082962036,
-0.12194568663835526,
0.04020253196358681,
-0.029072653502225876,
-0.0579606331884861,
0.0008014127961359918,
-0.07891663163900375,
-0.07158755511045456,
0.0060069868341088295,
-0.04757383093237877,
0.041175052523612976,
0.03418935090303421,
0.09851385653018951,
-0.03152376413345337,
0.006751406937837601,
0.06316275149583817,
-0.03774506226181984,
0.03611113131046295,
-0.050429463386535645,
0.0558663010597229,
-0.00023693544790148735,
-0.03824133425951004,
0.02043744921684265,
-0.10637838393449783,
0.14285337924957275,
-0.09578998386859894,
0.004519013687968254,
-0.037819188088178635,
0.027806205675005913,
-0.0069516850635409355,
0.11904606223106384,
0.06427203863859177,
0.010871181264519691,
0.019276108592748642,
-0.012606275267899036,
0.08377569168806076,
-0.04673357680439949,
0.007758983876556158,
0.10263469070196152,
-0.04001348465681076,
-0.01880529895424843,
0.07865013182163239,
-0.04728211089968681,
-0.024585969746112823,
-0.0007841140031814575,
-0.0036945065949112177,
0.01368595939129591,
1.691051846755542e-33,
-0.0464397594332695,
-0.0120852654799819,
0.0178615041077137,
-0.10619831085205078,
-0.03620190918445587,
-0.06826906651258469,
-0.0031988550908863544,
-0.0814937874674797,
0.01902191899716854,
-0.030974242836236954,
-0.04071439802646637,
-0.084830641746521,
0.0901070237159729,
0.033098701387643814,
-0.062388792634010315,
-0.09456998109817505,
-0.028788702562451363,
-0.00612820778042078,
-0.005266936961561441,
0.03249521553516388,
0.06555869430303574,
0.06774859130382538,
0.06706533581018448,
-0.0002474364300724119,
-0.0026856439653784037,
-0.04024248942732811,
0.05747443810105324,
-0.026925915852189064,
0.032543495297431946,
0.004497184883803129,
0.018844643607735634,
0.09040089696645737,
0.03779201582074165,
-0.021934907883405685,
0.05286816880106926,
-0.018682705238461494,
0.06261968612670898,
0.04922223836183548,
-0.029218392446637154,
-0.025924811139702797,
-0.05483485758304596,
0.06261684745550156,
0.03007081337273121,
0.06974764913320541,
-0.0003422230656724423,
-0.06920214742422104,
0.0030180937610566616,
0.05958344787359238,
0.002372872084379196,
-0.023163696750998497,
-0.03211844339966774,
0.018027562648057938,
-0.014160758815705776,
0.025966936722397804,
-0.08132000267505646,
-0.011714767664670944,
-0.025782667100429535,
0.00976872444152832,
0.08241686224937439,
0.000592736410908401,
0.029747359454631805,
0.02081044390797615,
0.02211240492761135,
0.06412868201732635,
-0.024229634553194046,
-0.08074963837862015,
0.0028373373206704855,
-0.006636184640228748,
-0.015085369348526001,
0.038964368402957916,
0.020672012120485306,
0.023530980572104454,
0.03136604651808739,
-0.06337199360132217,
-0.02820259891450405,
0.06207795441150665,
0.10730350017547607,
-0.04407811537384987,
0.06495746225118637,
-0.04905004799365997,
-0.10290146619081497,
-0.06878383457660675,
-0.032551247626543045,
0.0072809564881026745,
0.055319707840681076,
-0.009978819638490677,
0.010738903656601906,
-0.06223318353295326,
0.02167394384741783,
-0.00015155378787312657,
0.06472980231046677,
-0.0587676502764225,
0.014752618037164211,
0.029966093599796295,
-0.012647545896470547,
-3.6646962088686086e-33,
0.0024668287951499224,
0.03566978499293327,
0.020460614934563637,
-0.005979820154607296,
0.045897793024778366,
-0.005843265447765589,
-0.04344889894127846,
-0.10812246054410934,
-0.0485067255795002,
-0.011618371121585369,
-0.05638914927840233,
0.030633090063929558,
0.13046875596046448,
0.09758449345827103,
-0.010160000063478947,
0.00566902756690979,
0.009432441554963589,
-0.03449317440390587,
-0.0009037981508299708,
-0.04119044169783592,
0.04587797820568085,
0.05567607656121254,
-0.03521506115794182,
0.13057543337345123,
-0.03106975182890892,
-0.0040075769647955894,
0.029291626065969467,
0.0070732287131249905,
-0.07661015540361404,
-0.06779943406581879,
-0.11865782737731934,
0.025192763656377792,
-0.07569505274295807,
0.08927959203720093,
-0.016425348818302155,
-0.005103621631860733,
0.06334686279296875,
-0.12219657003879547,
-0.01869376003742218,
0.05470054969191551,
0.014871629886329174,
-0.006466221529990435,
-0.07029277086257935,
-0.03872465714812279,
-0.03558117523789406,
0.04763239249587059,
0.03127755597233772,
0.029580721631646156,
-0.044717296957969666,
-0.005904784891754389,
-0.06181598827242851,
-0.013018188066780567,
-0.07151640951633453,
0.0616779588162899,
-0.0008496837108395994,
0.015512828715145588,
0.050745267421007156,
-0.008502484299242496,
0.014533634297549725,
0.07722620666027069,
-0.03939242288470268,
0.05504760518670082,
0.029765870422124863,
-0.052287016063928604,
0.09967005252838135,
0.012010970152914524,
-0.16071166098117828,
-0.08743691444396973,
-0.0360693633556366,
-0.023052716627717018,
0.040121350437402725,
-0.10293972492218018,
-0.05290689691901207,
-0.032535385340452194,
-0.02513054758310318,
0.03220311924815178,
0.09147381037473679,
-0.042459264397621155,
-0.04163799434900284,
0.0059475586749613285,
0.02526593580842018,
-0.08185621351003647,
0.04613976180553436,
0.0011172855738550425,
0.02916681580245495,
0.06452536582946777,
0.06360368430614471,
-0.06427565217018127,
0.0031183953396975994,
0.07060343027114868,
-0.0729580745100975,
-0.017747456207871437,
0.02102072909474373,
0.01255197823047638,
-0.002785072196274996,
-5.597297558779246e-8,
0.002968722954392433,
-0.001558444695547223,
-0.037753358483314514,
0.03452541306614876,
-0.0003564183716662228,
-0.04405934363603592,
-0.09733542054891586,
-0.016558894887566566,
-0.07442551851272583,
0.022197749465703964,
0.1023525595664978,
0.020581869408488274,
0.03775733709335327,
-0.06585704535245895,
0.053799498826265335,
0.08363733440637589,
-0.04077824950218201,
-0.05335265025496483,
-0.060160376131534576,
-0.010983975604176521,
-0.03626013919711113,
0.004974284674972296,
0.03385047987103462,
0.044356510043144226,
-0.004966394510120153,
0.019940916448831558,
-0.019289886578917503,
0.08547646552324295,
-0.009201728738844395,
-0.017519518733024597,
-0.07538144290447235,
0.05933556333184242,
-0.05329594388604164,
-0.009659986011683941,
-0.0450584776699543,
0.0013650620821863413,
-0.02014140971004963,
0.012265022844076157,
0.07099317014217377,
-0.011672078631818295,
0.01100967638194561,
-0.08412644267082214,
-0.02298150025308132,
0.05138460919260979,
0.028599487617611885,
-0.025546042248606682,
-0.07642833143472672,
0.0219898521900177,
0.09344746917486191,
-0.07192155718803406,
-0.06318444013595581,
-0.052242930978536606,
0.03719690814614296,
0.06535542756319046,
0.09325253963470459,
0.039248280227184296,
-0.03730266913771629,
-0.006270139012485743,
-0.004543012473732233,
-0.022631175816059113,
0.04211898893117905,
0.03629472479224205,
0.03193003684282303,
-0.08594556152820587
] | {
"pdf_file": "VKYCBKG23DZUNRHO3X6XJJ6UGS6PEAYD.pdf",
"text": "CBC SPECIAL ORDER ON THE SECOND CHANCE ACT\n \nMr. SCOTT of Virginia: Madam Speaker, I want to thank the gentleman from\nIllinois for scheduling this special order on the Second Chance Act and for his\nlong and diligent labors to move the bill forward as part of his lifetime of dedication\nto protecting and serving the public's interest. \n \n He has been a dedicated public servant on this issue, ensuring that those who are in prison\nhave a chance to turn their lives around and become productive citizens. That is why he is the\nchief sponsor of the Second Chance Act. \n \n Congressman Davis ' efforts not only benefit the offenders, because for everyone who comes\nout and establishes a law-abiding and productive life, one or more potential victims of crime\nnever become victims, and the taxpayers have to pay less in prison expenses because one less\nperson is not going back to prison. \n \n This is the third Congress in a row that we have been working on this bill on a bipartisan\nbasis. I believe this year we will be successful in passing the bill. \n \n Madam Speaker, over the last decade we have seen an unprecedented explosion in our\nprison and jail populations. Now there are more than 2.2 million people incarcerated in Federal\nand State prisons and local jails, a tenfold increase since just 1980. Moreover, the annual\nexpenses for corrections have increased from $9 billion in 1982 to more than $65 billion today.\nThe figures continue to grow. These figures do not include the cost of arrest and prosecution,\nnor do they take into account the cost to victims of crime. \n \n As a result of this focus in incarceration, the United States leads the world in per capita\nincarceration rates. The United States locks up 726 inmates for every 100,000 in population,\naccording to 2004 data. \n \n The international average is about 100 per 100,000. 142 in England and Wales, 117 in\nAustralia, 116 in Canada, 91 in Germany, 85 in France. So the United States average is more\nthan seven times the international average of about 100 per 100,000. The closest competitor is\n 1 / 3 CBC SPECIAL ORDER ON THE SECOND CHANCE ACT\n532 inmates per 100,000 in Russia. That is 726 in the United States, Russia, second place, 532\nper 100,000. \n \n This year, more than 650,000 people will be released from State and Federal prisons to\ncommunities nationwide, along with more than 9 million people leaving our local jails. According\nto the Department of Justice, 67 percent of offenders leaving State and Federal prison will be\nrearrested within the next 3 years. \n \n There is a pressing need to provide ex-offenders with education and training, drug treatment\nand medical and mental health services necessary to afford them the ability to obtain and hold\nsteady jobs. \n \n The statistics underlying the needs of our prison population are staggering. For example, 57\npercent of Federal and 70 percent of State inmates used drugs regularly before prison, with\nsome estimates going as high as 84 percent of alcohol or drug use at the time the offense\noccurred. \n \n Furthermore, one-third of all jail inmates will have some physical or mental disability.\nTwenty-five percent of jail inmates in fact have been treated at some time for mental or\nemotional problems. And as has been detailed by many researchers, other deficiencies include\nlimited education and few job skills or job experience. \n \n Evidence from the Department of Justice indicates that the needs for prison population are not\nbeing met under the current system. If we allow them to return to their communities with few\neconomic opportunities where they were actually involved in crime and where their friends and\nassociates may still be involved in crime and substance abuse, if we allow them to return to\nthose communities without support, we can only expect to see the extension of the cycle of\nrecidivism. \n \n With bipartisan support in this legislation, we are set to build a broad web of programs which\nwill help break the cycle of recidivism laying at the heart of our prison population explosion. The\nSecond Chance Act provides a host of evidence-based approaches designed to reduce the high\nrate of recidivism that we are now experiencing. \n 2 / 3 CBC SPECIAL ORDER ON THE SECOND CHANCE ACT\n \n If we are going to continue to send more and more people to prison with longer and longer\nsentences, we should do as much as we reasonably can to assure that when they do return to\ntheir communities, they don't turn around and commit new offenses and have to go back to\nprison. \n \n Madam Speaker, let's be clear: The primary reason for supporting the Second Chance Act is\nnot to benefit the offenders, although it does benefit the offenders. The primary reason for doing\nso is it better assures us that we and other Members of the community will not be victims of\ncrime in the future and because the taxpayer will have to pay less in services under the Second\nChance Act than we now have to pay because of the high recidivism rate and having people go\nback to prison. \n \n So I want to thank again the gentleman from Illinois for holding this special order to bring\nattention to this important issue and the legislation that has been carefully drawn up to address\nit. I thank Mr. Davis for being the chief sponsor of the Second Chance Act. We are going to\nwork as hard as we can to make sure it passes the House and the Senate.\n 3 / 3"
} |
[
-0.013486373238265514,
-0.04102467745542526,
0.09140033274888992,
-0.040869612246751785,
-0.08543352037668228,
-0.07539985328912735,
-0.13070209324359894,
0.04588278383016586,
-0.0399317629635334,
-0.03558150306344032,
-0.04344378039240837,
-0.04448118805885315,
0.012775806710124016,
0.017427999526262283,
-0.11514156311750412,
0.12031826376914978,
0.04321645572781563,
-0.03499871492385864,
0.010803415440022945,
0.007638862356543541,
0.11866701394319534,
-0.022190874442458153,
0.016991853713989258,
-0.021475529298186302,
-0.002180960960686207,
0.07679690420627594,
-0.011016887612640858,
0.03542834147810936,
0.005100303795188665,
-0.015069445595145226,
0.05883016809821129,
-0.028480952605605125,
0.023416662588715553,
-0.08297694474458694,
0.05701080709695816,
0.14282293617725372,
0.005902780219912529,
0.005199344828724861,
0.002237780950963497,
0.05724053829908371,
-0.02916780859231949,
-0.04003874957561493,
0.01735932007431984,
0.022839771583676338,
-0.07474768906831741,
-0.059393126517534256,
0.014875599183142185,
-0.05349137261509895,
0.0028105895034968853,
-0.03429817035794258,
0.06148767098784447,
-0.04733416438102722,
0.07388639450073242,
0.10042960196733475,
-0.04435012489557266,
-0.06552193313837051,
0.0032911133021116257,
-0.02635713666677475,
0.0040304637514054775,
0.03823358565568924,
-0.040387727320194244,
0.03171048313379288,
-0.009672848507761955,
-0.0031411258969455957,
0.04616593196988106,
-0.0474715381860733,
-0.0055418480187654495,
-0.022830167785286903,
-0.08804862946271896,
-0.06494101136922836,
-0.020900113508105278,
0.007125564385205507,
-0.018536020070314407,
-0.0292232446372509,
0.007899600081145763,
0.049908120185136795,
0.04300364851951599,
0.03669271618127823,
0.022068820893764496,
-0.035490453243255615,
0.06705358624458313,
-0.0036246157251298428,
-0.025964660570025444,
-0.027521202340722084,
0.001614051521755755,
0.09936802089214325,
-0.02859179489314556,
0.0605754517018795,
0.06420554220676422,
-0.07025828212499619,
0.018451228737831116,
-0.03908487781882286,
0.021447258070111275,
-0.037491533905267715,
0.02796582691371441,
0.049903906881809235,
-0.012754961848258972,
-0.006856583524495363,
-0.05708151310682297,
0.029964568093419075,
-0.030491434037685394,
0.027730194851756096,
-0.004506122786551714,
-0.14227363467216492,
0.00030035831150598824,
-0.05568738654255867,
-0.009393278509378433,
0.10209545493125916,
-0.04621521383523941,
0.012085909955203533,
0.03217758238315582,
-0.07754287868738174,
0.019831346347928047,
0.0615827701985836,
-0.02206106297671795,
0.05707361921668053,
0.01693287305533886,
0.010350026190280914,
-0.02429829351603985,
0.005171890836209059,
-0.018018202856183052,
-0.03284108638763428,
-0.03932643681764603,
-0.02551473304629326,
0.03893407806754112,
-0.035836201161146164,
-0.045835915952920914,
3.470161077357136e-33,
0.036596525460481644,
-0.039990492165088654,
-0.04435493424534798,
0.033316802233457565,
-0.026905139908194542,
0.0048002335242927074,
0.07609747350215912,
0.023812519386410713,
-0.11976130306720734,
-0.03908374905586243,
0.05078549683094025,
0.026766663417220116,
-0.01833312213420868,
0.02471490576863289,
-0.036107636988162994,
-0.08332200348377228,
-0.009264823980629444,
0.0024826109874993563,
-0.03240802884101868,
-0.024572866037487984,
0.06021839380264282,
-0.09169132262468338,
0.033054184168577194,
-0.0069979154504835606,
0.017499282956123352,
-0.06538398563861847,
0.048227813094854355,
0.0404520258307457,
0.00655348738655448,
-0.0022166864946484566,
-0.04899195581674576,
0.062337491661310196,
0.019729793071746826,
0.032671526074409485,
-0.044118016958236694,
-0.020447731018066406,
-0.05334895849227905,
0.030592424795031548,
-0.05337495356798172,
-0.04220598191022873,
-0.015188769437372684,
0.021111661568284035,
-0.002601757412776351,
-0.01248456072062254,
0.04420412331819534,
-0.033215317875146866,
0.026149369776248932,
-0.006375675555318594,
0.07020982354879379,
-0.058817148208618164,
0.08834327757358551,
0.0525488518178463,
-0.10705656558275223,
-0.026990549638867378,
-0.010249899700284004,
-0.04978561773896217,
-0.007067278493195772,
-0.027058737352490425,
0.04763547703623772,
-0.016983862966299057,
-0.06731922924518585,
0.08049854636192322,
-0.03644084185361862,
-0.02194589376449585,
-0.048594292253255844,
-0.050541140139102936,
-0.012980111874639988,
0.07195042073726654,
0.08321832120418549,
0.026199832558631897,
0.004821839742362499,
-0.06165958195924759,
0.012992842122912407,
0.12251920253038406,
-0.04248960688710213,
-0.02822086215019226,
-0.0017773282015696168,
0.04780818149447441,
0.0663769319653511,
0.07386519759893417,
-0.04321024939417839,
-0.03833279386162758,
0.053099360316991806,
0.0766703262925148,
0.09216443449258804,
-0.047107480466365814,
-0.024910692125558853,
0.07303833961486816,
-0.051300063729286194,
-0.061933331191539764,
0.04358125478029251,
-0.03400024026632309,
-0.055087074637413025,
0.0008656521677039564,
0.02852606773376465,
-4.564945986051965e-33,
-0.03429845720529556,
0.04507945105433464,
-0.014085649512708187,
-0.006554973311722279,
0.042703378945589066,
0.022864509373903275,
0.024050407111644745,
-0.0565575510263443,
0.061960309743881226,
0.08762430399656296,
-0.06494590640068054,
0.06855256110429764,
-0.006153319496661425,
0.005350064020603895,
0.05673462152481079,
0.04160691797733307,
0.06167740747332573,
-0.144206240773201,
-0.0736190602183342,
-0.06985332071781158,
-0.00877286959439516,
0.08261700719594955,
-0.028100168332457542,
-0.004580541048198938,
-0.018894044682383537,
0.033950675278902054,
-0.02731233276426792,
-0.04717341810464859,
-0.02901664935052395,
-0.008897447027266026,
-0.11882594972848892,
-0.027572939172387123,
-0.11872344464063644,
0.006481857970356941,
-0.09391625970602036,
-0.02026359923183918,
-0.00011465153511380777,
0.015577370300889015,
0.019219648092985153,
-0.03790155425667763,
0.020457228645682335,
0.002190797124058008,
0.002669981913641095,
0.06325738877058029,
-0.01554438378661871,
-0.01322243083268404,
-0.01934737153351307,
-0.16038945317268372,
-0.005284051410853863,
0.015575050376355648,
-0.03485221415758133,
0.11765285581350327,
0.041863568127155304,
0.015890082344412804,
0.056401003152132034,
-0.005323334597051144,
0.028357969596982002,
-0.05096025392413139,
-0.03798306733369827,
-0.0276190135627985,
0.05051378905773163,
0.0909397229552269,
-0.0181342214345932,
0.0010760377626866102,
-0.035195060074329376,
-0.0025153227616101503,
-0.008536424487829208,
-0.08509794622659683,
-0.04560103639960289,
0.015488550066947937,
0.00053363450570032,
0.007873286493122578,
0.04201449826359749,
-0.06271857768297195,
0.06771817058324814,
0.00005566504842136055,
-0.05210835859179497,
0.04324157163500786,
-0.07743186503648758,
0.03622303903102875,
0.02013995870947838,
0.009082657285034657,
0.02682640217244625,
-0.0177739430218935,
0.07556719332933426,
-0.07505136728286743,
0.055373117327690125,
-0.041311025619506836,
0.08095475286245346,
0.06665574014186859,
-0.004338253755122423,
0.018647130578756332,
-0.07577990740537643,
0.0673266351222992,
0.10340282320976257,
-5.301057726114777e-8,
0.005439293570816517,
-0.017139334231615067,
-0.06325528025627136,
-0.023091142997145653,
0.054520074278116226,
-0.05342354252934456,
-0.0507490411400795,
0.16736680269241333,
0.022695083171129227,
0.03726350516080856,
0.04966714605689049,
0.07127666473388672,
-0.005527314264327288,
0.09447112679481506,
-0.0118438471108675,
0.0010810280218720436,
0.06922287493944168,
-0.023210642859339714,
-0.054595958441495895,
-0.022386176511645317,
-0.01600845344364643,
-0.017406713217496872,
-0.048500873148441315,
0.08101698756217957,
0.0070724389515817165,
-0.07598810642957687,
-0.07923264801502228,
0.02662735804915428,
-0.06047263741493225,
0.007150222081691027,
0.025237571448087692,
0.0650874450802803,
-0.03739354386925697,
-0.004504274111241102,
-0.008725756779313087,
0.021795788779854774,
0.02975442074239254,
-0.007048419211059809,
-0.030871456488966942,
0.05467931181192398,
0.034725386649370193,
0.03461343050003052,
0.013613682240247726,
0.006488720420747995,
0.04736040160059929,
0.04768168553709984,
-0.16739995777606964,
-0.019372446462512016,
0.04647386074066162,
-0.007699431385844946,
0.04083830118179321,
-0.027650784701108932,
0.01634874939918518,
0.04218963161110878,
0.10744956880807877,
-0.028599539771676064,
-0.0310867577791214,
-0.046069081872701645,
0.0315295048058033,
-0.04023651033639908,
-0.014275580644607544,
-0.023522542789578438,
0.06147998943924904,
-0.004359861370176077
] | {
"pdf_file": "VYK5MZE2ESWMGNXTHQZ56OQ46BR3JJUG.pdf",
"text": "May 9, 2007 Murtha: Elrama Sewerage Project Receives $1 million Grant\nFor Immediate Release\n\r\nMay 9, 2007 \n\r\n \n\r\n\r\n\r\nMurtha: Elrama Sewerage Project Receives $1 million Grant\n\r\n\r\n \n\r\n \n\r\nWashington D.C. - Congressman John P. Murtha, Chairman of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense,\nannounced today that the Elrama Sewerage Project, Washington County, has received a $1 million grant through the\nArmy Corps of Engineers to expand sewer service to 240 dwellings in Union Township. \n\r\n\r\nThe Elrama project will eliminate raw sewage that is being discharged into the Monongahela River and will eliminate\npollution around the Pennsylvania American Water Company treatment facility, which furnishes potable water to several\nresidents in the southern section of the City of Pittsburgh. \n\r\n\r\n\"The Elrama Sewerage Project is a priority of Washington County, and I am pleased that with this funding the project will\nmove forward to construction phase,\" said Murtha. \"This project will eliminate the current malfunctioning on-lot systems,\nresulting in a healthier community and an economic tool for the residents and businesses of Washington County.\"\n\r\n\r\nThe project consists of the construction of approximately 27,000 linear feet of sanitary sewers, manholes and\nappurtenances; a pumping station and a force main. Treatment will be provided at the existing sewerage treatment plant\nof the West Elizabeth Sanitary Authority. \n\r\n\r\nThe funding received through Congressman Murtha will help to reduce the monthly user charge to local residents. The\ntotal cost of the project is expected to be over $5,100,000.\n\r\n \r\nThe Online Office of Congressman John Murtha\nhttp://www.murtha.house.gov Powered by Joomla! Generated: 30 January, 2009, 05:39"
} |
[
-0.025507846847176552,
0.054355476051568985,
-0.0035452484153211117,
-0.03400550037622452,
0.032433170825242996,
0.058032263070344925,
-0.0006901230080984533,
-0.07889542728662491,
-0.027791181579232216,
-0.0005757635808549821,
-0.011216633021831512,
0.07119486480951309,
0.05770612880587578,
-0.05953878164291382,
0.032988470047712326,
0.03597599267959595,
0.0013381338212639093,
0.048413679003715515,
-0.060855112969875336,
0.05616927146911621,
-0.06825534999370575,
-0.005729093682020903,
0.11074338853359222,
0.047864880412817,
-0.07700425386428833,
0.059375762939453125,
0.01562642678618431,
0.06219685077667236,
-0.0321178138256073,
-0.02424486353993416,
0.05167671665549278,
-0.0650777816772461,
-0.026900196447968483,
0.05172843113541603,
0.04938580095767975,
-0.02962671034038067,
0.12027065455913544,
0.005895839538425207,
0.01865142025053501,
-0.046016670763492584,
0.05193844065070152,
-0.06351116299629211,
-0.0019747742917388678,
0.03949763998389244,
-0.058899763971567154,
-0.002341672545298934,
0.0002685667423065752,
0.05142776295542717,
0.01602470688521862,
-0.101944200694561,
0.017759380862116814,
0.019883587956428528,
-0.009875180199742317,
-0.04198002442717552,
0.07172891497612,
-0.009733710438013077,
-0.01670827716588974,
-0.001314243534579873,
0.08248592168092728,
-0.054690245538949966,
0.013496956788003445,
0.07007822394371033,
-0.029554259032011032,
0.012936119921505451,
-0.052288513630628586,
-0.08493169397115707,
0.07340124249458313,
-0.04669598862528801,
-0.01874370127916336,
0.06144426390528679,
0.01843232847750187,
0.04558183625340462,
0.010870687663555145,
0.06448390334844589,
-0.0001539813238196075,
0.005806479137390852,
0.04755754768848419,
0.07733967155218124,
0.0339709036052227,
-0.04882347583770752,
-0.0029304532799869776,
-0.012932023033499718,
0.009684039279818535,
-0.047371335327625275,
-0.04476184770464897,
-0.11634820699691772,
-0.029734112322330475,
0.009199492633342743,
0.0890076532959938,
-0.00049767573364079,
-0.010988656431436539,
0.01587589643895626,
0.09398861229419708,
-0.14019657671451569,
0.11595987528562546,
-0.005169721320271492,
0.002217512810602784,
0.10045187920331955,
0.018810905516147614,
0.08080431073904037,
-0.009933602064847946,
-0.002790008904412389,
-0.07838232815265656,
-0.04057666286826134,
0.025680668652057648,
-0.015265384688973427,
-0.04265885055065155,
0.04102239012718201,
-0.07881690561771393,
-0.04883505776524544,
0.005811385344713926,
-0.04955820366740227,
-0.02746022306382656,
-0.004914905875921249,
0.09925495833158493,
0.0034755603410303593,
0.06722858548164368,
-0.02756466530263424,
0.020766861736774445,
0.002130822278559208,
0.016697730869054794,
0.06120457872748375,
-0.06789397448301315,
0.09274175763130188,
0.025169432163238525,
-0.016133686527609825,
-0.06419787555932999,
3.707109514414215e-33,
-0.02616574801504612,
-0.05347273871302605,
-0.02793373540043831,
-0.019320935010910034,
0.006224038079380989,
-0.01116339024156332,
-0.05669628456234932,
-0.07619241625070572,
-0.020945927128195763,
0.04849652200937271,
0.019395526498556137,
-0.0059200795367360115,
0.05891988053917885,
0.045005783438682556,
-0.028165416792035103,
0.05988769605755806,
-0.048805899918079376,
-0.028322337195277214,
-0.008645591326057911,
-0.04328931123018265,
0.06891440600156784,
0.01910983771085739,
0.0012815266381949186,
0.054108209908008575,
-0.013325436972081661,
0.01694704033434391,
0.018657658249139786,
0.009126358665525913,
-0.0260242260992527,
0.015334504656493664,
-0.04974435642361641,
-0.030403245240449905,
0.03631170839071274,
-0.01948964037001133,
0.04696790874004364,
-0.020298190414905548,
0.03298187628388405,
-0.026947302743792534,
-0.04500928893685341,
-0.058207668364048004,
0.04806363955140114,
0.0523458831012249,
-0.06639732420444489,
0.030060172080993652,
0.007401907816529274,
0.012685898691415787,
0.04818751662969589,
-0.021006284281611443,
0.011802202090620995,
0.02958548441529274,
0.04286276549100876,
0.005532285198569298,
0.026054557412862778,
-0.04049327224493027,
-0.08575771003961563,
0.02879190444946289,
-0.023761894553899765,
0.07279277592897415,
0.05772313475608826,
-0.0392058864235878,
-0.006539360620081425,
0.07460198551416397,
-0.019741958007216454,
0.01854192465543747,
0.017077269032597542,
-0.09453481435775757,
-0.09558311104774475,
0.06536569446325302,
-0.04698432981967926,
-0.06662917882204056,
0.07179372757673264,
0.023522932082414627,
-0.04119411110877991,
-0.08799418061971664,
-0.06285110861063004,
0.056467294692993164,
0.04363947734236717,
-0.038473907858133316,
0.04470254108309746,
-0.044825658202171326,
-0.09487003087997437,
0.04171527922153473,
0.10347138345241547,
-0.013698317110538483,
-0.00816759280860424,
-0.056628383696079254,
-0.01495344191789627,
-0.03924084082245827,
-0.003224038751795888,
0.014683625660836697,
-0.003923474345356226,
0.04664497449994087,
0.04247822239995003,
-0.014723741449415684,
-0.12171480059623718,
-7.016712389786427e-33,
-0.014421315863728523,
0.0009436362888664007,
0.013391905464231968,
0.06372310221195221,
-0.0016710672061890364,
-0.03202461823821068,
-0.012725990265607834,
-0.0033582295291125774,
-0.013409680686891079,
-0.04328314587473869,
0.027745019644498825,
-0.08368057012557983,
0.038141172379255295,
0.07818697392940521,
-0.010997187346220016,
-0.0297909677028656,
-0.004560655914247036,
0.032185010612010956,
-0.046123944222927094,
0.007462971843779087,
-0.0596582256257534,
0.11238554865121841,
0.0033271918073296547,
0.05292673781514168,
-0.013856950215995312,
-0.03686267510056496,
0.08457838743925095,
-0.021712645888328552,
-0.02481386996805668,
-0.04901669919490814,
0.004615047946572304,
-0.011142835952341557,
-0.039054326713085175,
-0.0027988741640001535,
0.024640753865242004,
-0.03872134909033775,
0.05134929344058037,
-0.005785632412880659,
0.005168631207197905,
-0.00028659854433499277,
0.0922653079032898,
0.05936376005411148,
-0.09687381237745285,
-0.02097361348569393,
-0.08635499328374863,
0.04924662783741951,
0.005010850261896849,
0.06189187243580818,
-0.03423105925321579,
-0.0921400710940361,
-0.13493873178958893,
-0.02907796949148178,
-0.02162388525903225,
0.06564348936080933,
-0.0013180217938497663,
0.04113149270415306,
-0.018476635217666626,
0.016733160242438316,
0.06696037203073502,
0.032951999455690384,
-0.12171448022127151,
-0.028260068967938423,
-0.040280409157276154,
-0.04017315059900284,
0.13744772970676422,
0.04769248887896538,
-0.10664445161819458,
-0.0249194223433733,
0.03655019775032997,
0.019122181460261345,
-0.01610381342470646,
-0.11213426291942596,
-0.12480641901493073,
-0.031366147100925446,
0.04042336344718933,
0.002881791442632675,
-0.013073226436972618,
-0.043080925941467285,
-0.027623826637864113,
0.025437623262405396,
-0.0033793163020163774,
-0.11716700345277786,
-0.174788698554039,
0.006828652694821358,
0.03533652052283287,
0.030774634331464767,
-0.007280966266989708,
0.019428923726081848,
0.017461000010371208,
0.026308530941605568,
-0.03526449576020241,
-0.11747131496667862,
-0.01854211837053299,
0.0005272738635540009,
-0.002745320089161396,
-6.199883983981636e-8,
0.004084479995071888,
0.061059314757585526,
-0.07779160141944885,
0.09984908252954483,
-0.030580148100852966,
-0.01085609383881092,
0.038914959877729416,
-0.044138140976428986,
-0.0661487802863121,
0.10426804423332214,
0.04965360462665558,
-0.07833229750394821,
0.012612643651664257,
-0.047227393835783005,
0.024882500991225243,
0.04883022978901863,
-0.035996899008750916,
-0.02191523090004921,
-0.06100873276591301,
-0.08360809832811356,
0.013379596173763275,
-0.03171703964471817,
0.024690600112080574,
0.09580723196268082,
-0.005244933534413576,
-0.014783026650547981,
-0.0024653442669659853,
0.02757870964705944,
0.04904026910662651,
0.0021082500461488962,
-0.0539780929684639,
0.08098633587360382,
-0.12229784578084946,
-0.008410990238189697,
-0.027864912524819374,
-0.06651560962200165,
-0.04396451637148857,
0.05578024312853813,
0.04199298098683357,
0.017168888822197914,
-0.07539166510105133,
-0.009046703577041626,
-0.006008690223097801,
-0.03905678912997246,
-0.008017856627702713,
0.028652016073465347,
-0.03130950406193733,
0.0803850069642067,
-0.0660926029086113,
-0.020586831495165825,
0.005951558239758015,
0.023762574419379234,
0.003103862516582012,
0.06802314519882202,
0.027691036462783813,
0.011507036164402962,
0.04364556819200516,
0.005968915764242411,
0.01574944704771042,
0.0006161619094200432,
0.05010579898953438,
-0.04832376912236214,
-0.011637652292847633,
-0.08732355386018753
] | {
"pdf_file": "3HATKPN6TVEYUNQ6PK5MYH6VA6VX6ECE.pdf",
"text": "846 May 7 /Administration of William J. Clinton, 1999\nBarbara Jordan's incomparable voice for jus-\ntice on common ground.\nSince I'm here today, I cannot help noting\nthat the work of Lyndon Johnson and Bar-\nbara Jordan is being carried on today here\nin Austin by the State legislators who are try-\ning to pass hate crimes legislation in the\nname of James Byrd. As you probably saw\non the tarmac, I was honored to meet with\nmembers of Mr. Byrd's family. I know that\nwhat happened to him was anathema to every\ngood citizen in Texas, as well as the United\nStates.\nAnd I ask you, as our men and women\nin uniform today struggle against the killing,\nthe rape, the looting, the uprooting of peo-\nple, based solely on their ethnic and religious\nbackground in Kosovo, as they did in Bosnia,\nas we fight to reconcile people around the\nworld, from the Middle East to Northern Ire-\nland, here in America, if we want to do good\nabroad, we have to be good at home. We\nhave to stand up for what is right.\nWe have to acknowledge that there are dif-\nferences among us that we celebrate. There\nare differences among us that are real dif-\nferences, and we are compelled to disagree.\nBut underneath it all, as the Founders of our\nRepublic recognized, there is our common\nhumanity and our equal dignity. And we\nmust always stand for it. If we want to be\na force against ethnic cleansing and genocide\naround the world, we have to be a force for\nharmony and community, here at home in\nevery place in the United States.\nAnd so I close with the point I tried to\nmake at the beginning. I want you to think\nabout what this represents and how you did\nit. What it represents is a commitment to a\ncommon future, where no one is left behind\nand everybody has a chance. How you did\nit is by working together, across all the ele-\nments of this richly textured community. If\nyou think about it, we could solve all of our\nproblems that way. Thanks for the model.\nGood luck, and God bless you.\nWait a minute. I want to do one other\nthing. I want to thank the Barbara Jordan\nElementary Choir and the Pflugerville High\nSchool Band. Thank you very much. How\nabout a little more music? Let's go.NOTE: The President spoke at 5:38 p.m. In his\nremarks, he referred to Mayor Kirk Watson of\nAustin, TX; and former Representative J.J. Pickle.\nThis item was not received in time for publication\nin the appropriate issue.\nRemarks at a Democratic National\nCommittee Dinner in Austin\nMay 7, 1999\nThank you very much. You know, when\nRoy was doing that riff, you know, ``Before\nhe came, I didn't know I needed new fur-\nniture; I didn't know I needed new art work;\nI didn't know I needed''ÐMary kept getting\nredder and redder, and finally she says, ``He\nmay not know he needs another place to\nspend the night tonight.'' [ Laughter ] I must\nsay this is a lot better than the last hovel\nwe spent the night in. [ Laughter ]\nLet me say to all of you, I've had a wonder-\nful time here tonight, seeing so many of my\nold friends. There are a lot of people hereÐ\nthe ones Roy mentioned and also Carlos\nTruan, Gonzalo BarrientosÐa lot of other\npeople who were with Roy and Gary and\nJudy and Nancy and Tom, all the rest of us,\nway back in 1972. And we have remained\nfriends for a long time. And during most of\nthat time, with the odd interruption, some-\ntimes the odd, wonderful interruption like\nthe reign of Governor Richards, the election\nof Lloyd Doggett, we've been in the minor-\nity.\nAnd I want to talk tonight a little bit\naboutÐI want to have kind of a serious con-\nversation tonight about why I really came\nhere, because what Joe said is right. I'm not\nrunning for anything. And I would seize any\nexcuse to come here to Austin, because I had\nsome of the happiest days of my life here,\nand I have a very jealous wife who wishes\nshe were here today.\nBut for the next 2 years, I'm helping the\nDemocratic Party because I believe it's the\nright thing to do for America. I hear a lot\nof folks on the other side kind of licking their\nlips and saying, ``Well, wait until the next\nelection, and we'll have Clinton out of the\nway. Maybe it will be better.''\nWhat I want to say to you is that I am\nvery grateful that I've had the chance to serve\nyou. And I am profoundly grateful that we 847 Administration of William J. Clinton, 1999 /May 7\nhave the lowest unemployment in 30 years\nand the lowest welfare rolls in forever and\na dayÐthey're half the size they were be-\nforeÐand the lowest crime rate in 25 years.\nRoy was saying that we've got 90 percent of\nour children immunized against serious dis-\neases for the first time in history. The doors\nof college are virtually open to every Amer-\nican now because of our HOPE tax credit\nand the student loan changes we've made.\nWe've set aside more land in perpetuity than\nany administration, except for the two Roo-\nsevelts, in American history. I'm grateful for\nall that.\nBut what I want you to understand is that\nI'm grateful because I got a chance to imple-\nment a set of ideas that now represent the\ngoverning philosophy of the Democratic\nParty. And it is very different from the driv-\ning philosophy of the other party. And if the\nAmerican people like the results that have\nbeen achieved, then we need to support\nthose people running for the Congress and\nthe White House who believe in these ideas.\nIn 1991, when the incumbent President\nwas at 75 percent approval and I decided to\nmake this race when nobody but my mother\nand my wife thought I could win, I did it\nbecause I was worried about my country and\nmy Capital. Because it seemed to me that\nthere was nothing particularly wrong with\nAmerica that couldn't be fixed if we would\njust open our eyes and go to work. The un-\nemployment rate was high, inequality was in-\ncreasing, the social problems were worsen-\ning, and we had a lot of problems around\nthe world that we didn't seem to have any\ngoverning idea of dealing with. But I felt\ngreat about America. I just thought we had\nto change the way Washington worked.\nJust go back in your mind to that period\nand that long period where the other party\nspent 12 years telling us how terrible the\nGovernment was, and a lot of our guys were\nsort of fighting a rearguard action defending\nit. But most of the ideological battles which\ntook place in Washington were about yester-\nday instead of about tomorrow. And so I set\noff on this crazy journey with a lot of you,\nbased on a few simple ideas.\nFirst of all, I asked myself, what is the\nproblem? The problem is that we have not\nthought about how to take full advantage ofthis explosion in technology and the\nglobalization of the economy in society and\nat the same time figure out how not to leave\nanybody behind and make our families and\nour communities stronger and maintain our\npush for peace and prosperity around the\nworld. We haven't thought about how to\nmake the transition in a way that not only\nprovides vast opportunities for people like\nthose of us in this beautiful setting tonight,\nbut makes America as a nation stronger.\nAnd it seemed to me that what we had\nto do is to go back to some very basic things:\nthat we had an obligation to try to have op-\nportunity for every person who was respon-\nsible enough to deserve it; that we had to\ntry to build a community made up of every\nlaw-abiding citizen without regard to what\nother differences they had; that we had to\ncommit ourselves to be more involved in the\nrest of the world, not less involved, because\nthe world is growing smaller and smaller; and\nthat we needed a different sort of Govern-\nment that could be much smallerÐand it is\ntoday, by the way. It's the same size it was\nin 1962Ðthat's the size of your Federal Gov-\nernment today. And I'm proud of that.\nBut what you need to know, we made it\nsmaller but more active, focused not so much\non telling people what to do or maintaining\nold bureaucracies but giving people the tools\nthey need to make the most of their own\nlives. Those were my ideas: opportunity, re-\nsponsibility, community, a Government that\ngives people the tools to make the most of\ntheir own lives.\nAnd I thought to myself, there are a whole\nlot of things people believe that I don't think\nare true. I believed if we work at it, we could\nreduce the deficit and still increase our\nspending in education and health care if we\ndid it right. Well, 6 years later, we've got a\nhuge surplus, and we've nearly doubled\nspending in education and health care.\nI believed we could improve the economy\nand improve the environment. The air is\ncleaner and the water is cleaner than it was\n6 years ago. We've reduced chemicals in the\natmosphere from chemical plant emissions\nby 90 percent in the last 6 years.\nI believed that we could help people suc-\nceed at work and at home. And I still think\nthat's one of the biggest problems we've got 848 May 7 /Administration of William J. Clinton, 1999\nin this country, people trying to be good par-\nents and trying to meet their obligations at\nwork at the same time.\nI believed that we could promote\nentrepreneurialism and trade around the\nworld and still help people who, because of\ntheir education or where they live, are at risk\nof being left behind. Those are the things\nthat I believed.\nI believed that we can be a force for peace\nand recognize that there are some times\nwhen we have to use our overwhelming mili-\ntary force.\nI believed that in welfare we could reduce\nthe welfare rolls, get more people to work,\nand at the same time help people who were\non welfare to do a better job of raising their\nchildren. That we didn't have to hurt people\nin their responsibilities as parents, to say if\nyou're able-bodied you ought to work if you\ncan.\nI didn't believe thatÐall those choices and\nall those debates that I kept hearing in Wash-\nington. And so we set out to do it, and the\npublic responded, and the people gave me\na chance to serve. And then in '96, another\nchance. And then in '96 and '98 kept return-\ning more of our people to the Congress so\nthat we're at the point where we can almost\nreverse the election of '94. I think the elec-\ntion in '94 happened, by the way, because\nwe made the tough decisions as a party, all\nalone, to reduce the deficit, without a single\nvote from the other party, and increase our\ninvestment in education. We made the tough\ndecision almost all alone to pass a crime bill\nthat put 100,000 police on the street, banned\nassault weapons, and required the Brady\nbill's waiting period. And by the election in\n'94Ðand we tried to provide more health in-\nsurance, all alone, and didn't have enough\nvotes to do it. And by '94 what happened\nwas people knew what we'd done on the eco-\nnomic plan, but they didn't feel the economy\nwas getting better; they knew what we'd done\non the crime bill, but the NRA convinced\na bunch of hunters we were going to take\ntheir rifles. By '96 everybody still had their\nrifles and the crime rate had gone down, the\neconomy had gone up, and we got reelected.\nAnd the Congress is doing better ever since\nour elections.So now we're poised for this election in\n2000. And what I want to say to you is, I\nappreciate what Roy said about me, and it's\nnice to be introduced by your old friends.\nThey'll lie about you a little now and then.\nBut the truth is, you must believe this, this\nadministration has succeeded because we\nhad the right ideas and the right approach\nand we're grounded in the right values, and\nit's what represents the heart and soul of the\nDemocratic Party today. And that's why I'm\nhere.\nWe've got a lot of big decisions to make.\nAnd you have to decide who is going to make\nthem. We have to deal with the aging crisisÐ\ntwice as many people over 65 by 2030. I hope\nto live to be one of them. [ Laughter ] I've\ngiven the Congress a plan that will save Social\nSecurity, save Medicare, provide help for\npeople taking care of their parents and long-\nterm care, allow middle income people and\nlower income people to save for their own\nretirement for the first time and do it in a\nway that pays down the national debt by 2015\nto the lowest point it has been since before\nWorld War I. And that's really important to\nkeep the economy going, because we'll be\nless dependent on the vagaries of the global\nfinancial system.\nI've given the Congress a plan that will\nimprove the quality of education by ending\nsocial promotion, by providing after-school\nand summer school programs for our kids,\nby finishing the work of hooking all our class-\nrooms up to the Internet, by modernizing a\nlot of these old school buildings and helping\nthe school districts that are having kids in\nhouse trailers, by supporting better teaching,\nand by having national academic standards,\nwhich I hope our whole party will embrace\nand help us in this great battle we're in, be-\ncause I think you should have local control\nof the school about how to implement na-\ntional academic standards.\nThere's an international standard that all\nof our children need to meet if we want them\nto make a good living. And we're about the\nonly advanced country in the world that\ndoesn't have that. As a result, we've got the\nfinest system of higher education in the\nworld; no one believes that our system of ele-\nmentary and secondary education is uni-\nformly the finest in the world. And yet, it 849 Administration of William J. Clinton, 1999 /May 7\ncan be. And all the diversity we have in our\nschools is a great asset in a global society,\nbut every one of those kids deserves a chance\nat the brass ring.\nI was in the Alexandria school system the\nother day, across the river from the Capitol\nand the White House. There are kids from\na hundred different racial and ethnic groups\nthere, nearly a hundred different native lan-\nguages. Every one of them can make a con-\ntribution to America if he or she gets a world-\nclass education. And to pretend that it ought\nto be a local option whether they get it is,\nI think, obscuring what is plainly real here.\nSo we Democrats stand for more flexibility\nabout how to do things, but for national\nstandards of excellence based on inter-\nnational standards of what our children need\nto know. And I think the American people\nare with us on that.\nI could talk about a lot of other issues.\nI'd just like to mention one or two more.\nThe Vice President is coming down here to\nsouth Texas in a couple of weeks to our an-\nnual empowerment zone conference. Since\n1993, we've been trying to figure out ways\nto get more investment into poor urban\nneighborhoods and poor rural areas and poor\nNative American reservations, because there\nare still a lot of people that haven't partici-\npated in this economic recovery.\nAnd I worry a lot about how we're going\nto keep America's growth going and our un-\nemployment low without any inflation, espe-\ncially if we have trouble overseas. One way\nis to make more markets here at home. And\nthere are lots of places right here in Texas\nwhere unemployment is still too high, too\nmany hardworking people still don't have the\nskills they need, and where if we could attract\nthe right investment in the right way we\ncould have dramatic growth. So this is going\nto be a big challenge. If we can't get around\nnow to giving poor rural areas and urban\nareas that have been left behind the chances\nthey need, we'll never get around to it.\nLet me just mention one or two other\nthings. I am very interested in this whole\nissue of balancing work and family. And I\nthink there's some things we ought to do.\nI think we ought to raise the minimum wage\nagain. I think we ought to strengthen the\nfamily and medical leave law. I think weought to pass the Patients' Bill of Rights. I\nthink we ought to pass our child care plan\nto help lower income people with their child\ncare costs. We have to realize that most par-\nents have to work and every parent ought\nto have the option to do it, but no parent\nshould have to sacrifice the most important\njob any woman or man has, which is to raise\nstrong, good kids. There are a lot of things\nout there we have to do. We've got a big\njob to do in the world. You can see it today\nwith some of the problems we have.\nNow, I'd like to close by just asking you\nto think about three things and giving you\nexamples of what my philosophy is, that I\nthink is our party's philosophy. These are the\nbest of times for Americans, but we're all\npretty sobered up right now because of three\nevents of the recent days: One, are the ter-\nrible tornadoes in Oklahoma and Kansas and,\nto a lesser extent but still sad, in Texas and\nTennessee; two, is the heartbreaking incident\nin Littleton, Colorado; and third, is the con-\ntinuing conflict in Kosovo. Now, let me tell\nyou what they mean to me.\nFirst, the tornadoes mean that none of us\nshould get too big for our britches. We're\nnot in control. We have to maintain a certain\nhumility when thinking about all the prob-\nlems of the world. But as our hearts go out\nto those peopleÐI'm going up to Oklahoma\nCity tomorrow to tour the damage and talk\nabout what we can do to help them put their\nlives back togetherÐI'm thinking about what\nwe can do to try to prepare better for the\nnext one. I'm thinking about what we can\ndo if we know we're going to grow and ex-\npand in areas that have been tornado alleys,\nwhat we ought to do to build houses that\nwill do a better job of withstanding them or\nhave quicker escapes to places that will be\nsafer. In other words, I think what we always\nshould be thinking about is: How can we\nmake it better? How can we deal with what\nis going to come?\nIn the case of Littleton, on Monday, Hil-\nlary and I and Al and Tipper Gore are going\nto sponsor a big meeting at the White House\nwith people from the entertainment and\nInternet communities, people from the gun\nmanufacturers, people from the religious\ncommunities, people who work in schools on\nproblems of violence, students, a lot of other 850 May 7 /Administration of William J. Clinton, 1999\nsegments of our society, coming together to\ntalk about how we can start a national cam-\npaign to reduce the likelihood of violence\nagainst our children.\nNow, I think it is important that you know\nhow I look at this. I think the world's worst\nthing we can do is to use this awful heart-\nbreak to get into a fingerpointing session. Be-\ncause the truth is that not a single soul here\nknows exactly what triggered those kids. And\nwe all know that in any given time there will\nbe people who are more vulnerable than oth-\ners to whatever influences to which they're\nexposed to. But I do think we would all\nadmit, if we sort of take our defenses down,\nthat the society in which our children grow\nup today, number one, throws things at them\nfaster; number two, gives them even more\nopportunities to be isolated from their par-\nents and from their peers; number three, ex-\nposes them at an earlier age and in greater\nvolume and intensity to more violence and\nthe coarsening of human relationships; and\nnumber four, it's way too easy for them get\nthings like Tech-9 assault pistols. And I think\nwe can all sort of admit that.\nAnd what I'm trying to do is to figure out\nwhat we should all do here to launch a genu-\nine grassroots national campaign where I try\nto pass the laws I should pass; the gun manu-\nfacturers come forward and do what they\nought to do to try to protect our kids; the\nentertainment community makes a contribu-\ntion; the Internet community makes a con-\ntributionÐthey've worked hard, by the way,\nwith the Vice President to try to give parents\nmore screening technologiesÐand the reli-\ngious community comes forward; the mental\nhealth community comes forward; the\nschools provide more adequate counseling\nservices and peer mediation for the kids, and\nwhat some of our schools are doing now, pro-\nviding a hotline so kids who know what's\ngoing on in the school can call and tell some-\nbody without being subject to abuse.\nThere are lots of things to be done here.\nBut there's also something to be said here\nfor recognizing the incredible pressures that\nparents and children are under because life\nis so fast and so crowded. And it is easy for\nall of us, if we're not careful, to wind up being\nstrangers in our own homes. And our chil-\ndren need to understand also that no matterhow solid and rooted they are, childhood is\na fragile and difficult time. Every school will\nalways have its cliques. Every school will al-\nways have its groups. But we've got to teach\nour kids that they can enjoy being in their\ncrowd without looking down on the others;\nbecause people who are constantly subject\nto ridicule and abuse are going to have their\nlives twisted or distorted in some ways, unless\nthey are really superhuman.\nSo I'm looking forward to this. And all the\ncynics who say it can't be done, I would re-\nmind you that teen pregnancy is now down\n5 years in a row because of a national grass-\nroots movement, not because of any law we\npassed in Washington. Drunk driving is down\nbecause of Mothers and Students Against\nDrunk Driving. We now have 10,000 compa-\nnies that have voluntarily joined an alliance\nthat we organized a couple years ago to hire\npeople from welfare to work, and they've\nhired over 400,000 people without a single\nlaw being passed. We can do this. And I be-\nlieve we can do it, but only if our political,\npublic life brings us together and not drives\nus apart.\nAnd the last thing I'd like to say is about\nKosovo. I know this is a difficult issue. I saw\nthe people with their signs on the way in,\nsaying we ought to end the fighting. Nobody\nwants to do it more than me. I think those\nof you who've known me for 30 years know\nthat the most difficult thing that I ever have\nto do is use a superior position to put pres-\nsure on somebody else, particularly if it in-\nvolves the use of violence. I'm not that sort\nof person.\nBut let me tell you, since the end of com-\nmunism, we have seen the inevitable rise of\nnational aspirations and ethnic aspirations,\nespecially in Central and Eastern Europe. In\none place only, the former Yugoslavia, we\nhave seen that turned into a credo that says\nit is all right to burn the homes, destroy the\nrecords, destroy the churchesÐthe mosques,\nin this caseÐand the museums, and the li-\nbraries, and the very lives of families; it's all\nright to rape the daughters; it's all right to\nshoot the sons; it's all right to do this.\nAnd for 3 years, we worked, through the\nUnited Nations and negotiations and every-\nthing else, to end the war in Bosnia. And\nfinally, we ended the war in Bosnia when 851 Administration of William J. Clinton, 1999 /May 8\nNATO bombed and when the opposition\nforces started winning some battles on the\nground. And we've been able to maintain a\npeace there.\nPeople don't have to like each other. Peo-\nple may have legitimate grievances. But eth-\nnic cleansing and killing people wholesale be-\ncause of their race or religion is wrong. And\nthe United States is in a position to stand\nagainst it, and we ought to.\nI know there are a lot of people who dis-\nagree with me. They say, ``Well, we don't\nhave any vital national interest.'' I would\nargue to you that we do. It's not only a moral,\nhumanitarian issue. We'll be better off if our\nbest allies in the world, in Europe, live in\na continent that is whole and democratic and\nat peace and free of this sort of thing.\nFirst of all, they won't be wasting their\nmoney tearing each other up. Secondly,\nthey'll be better trading partners. Thirdly,\nthey'll be better partners in helping us solve\nproblems in other parts of the world. And\nif we can put an end to ethnic cleansing in\nEurope, then we can put an end to it in Afri-\nca, and we can put an end to it wherever\nelse it rears its ugly head.\nIf we can't solve this problem, it's very dif-\nficult to understand how our children are\ngoing to live in peace in a world where every\nradical terrorist group can get on the Internet\nand figure out how to build a bomb or get\nweapons or do anything else they want to\ndo. We have got, at least, to tell people that\nin the world of the 21st century, it is not\nokay to kill people just because they're of\na different race or ethnicity or religion.\nThat's why I must say, I want to applaud\nthe Senators who are here, who are trying\nto pass that hate crimes act in the legislature,\nin honor of James Byrd. I think it's very im-\nportant. It makes a statement.\nThis is the last thing I'll say about this.\nI've already talked longer than I meant to,\nbut if you don't remember anything else I\nsay, remember this: It is one thing to say that\nwe all ought to get along together and quite\nanother to do what is necessary for us to do\nso in decency and honor.\nThe differences among us are a part of\nwhat makes life more interesting and makes\nthis country so successful, as long as they are\ncontained. When the differences among us\nare used, as they are in Kosovo today, as theywere in Bosnia before, as an instrument of\nhuman destruction, they can quickly make\nlife unbearable.\nNow, we can't force anybody to like any-\nbody else. Maybe not everybody in this place\ntonight likes everybody else. But we live ac-\ncording to certain rules, and we do it not\nonly because it is morally right but because\nwe do better when other people do well.\nWhen we do the right thing or, as Hillary\nsays, when we act like we're in a village, we\nall are better off.\nSo I ask you to think about this. The\nDemocratic Party has stood for community\nand for opportunity and for citizen respon-\nsibility. We have refused to accept all these\nphony choices we were presented with, be-\ntween economic growth and the environ-\nment, between accountability and help in\neducation, and all the other things. These\nideas have led America to a better place.\nThat's why I'm here. I'm glad I was Presi-\ndent. I hope I was the instrument of a lot\nof the good things that have happened in this\ncountry. But the most important thing is that\nwe continue in this direction, that we stay\non this course, that we embrace these ideas.\nAnd that is why it is important to support\nthis party.\nI'm very grateful to you. Thank you, and\nGod bless you.\nNOTE: The President spoke at 8:38 p.m. at a pri-\nvate residence. In his remarks, he referred to Roy\nand Mary Spence, dinner hosts; Texas State Sen-\nators Carlos Truan and Gonzalo Barrientos; Gary\nMauro, former Texas land commissioner; Judy\nTrabulsi, Nancy Williams, and Tom Henderson,\nwho worked with the President on the 1972\nMcGovern campaign in Texas; former Gov. Ann\nRichards of Texas; and Joseph J. Andrew, national\nchair, Democratic National Committee. This item\nwas not received in time for publication in the\nappropriate issue.\nThe President's Radio Address\nMay 8, 1999\nGood morning. I want to talk to you today\nabout our efforts to help the people and com-\nmunities devastated by the terrible tornadoes\nthat hit Oklahoma, Kansas, Texas, and Ten-\nnessee this week. These tornadoes killed over\n50 people, injured hundreds more, and dam-\naged or destroyed thousands of homes and"
} |
[
-0.11148443818092346,
-0.01767371967434883,
-0.00001944215182447806,
-0.010704107582569122,
0.041814979165792465,
0.06722886860370636,
0.019410334527492523,
-0.01681561768054962,
-0.0000584603039897047,
-0.06686171144247055,
0.1228732243180275,
0.05143916234374046,
-0.02895023487508297,
-0.0663289874792099,
-0.04988015443086624,
-0.08309166133403778,
0.029972266405820847,
0.01133195124566555,
-0.08878301084041595,
0.02723013237118721,
0.0472852885723114,
0.015207638032734394,
-0.029493100941181183,
0.044841133058071136,
-0.07071169465780258,
-0.06005705147981644,
-0.14770838618278503,
-0.010467245243489742,
0.010404644533991814,
-0.0914144217967987,
-0.008375091478228569,
0.10062868893146515,
0.0383228175342083,
0.046866171061992645,
0.06195884943008423,
0.05257405340671539,
-0.0034199045039713383,
-0.08212032914161682,
0.024105140939354897,
-0.0347614623606205,
0.04383388161659241,
-0.07268112897872925,
-0.0623202882707119,
-0.01508156768977642,
-0.05594604089856148,
0.017062919214367867,
0.023092318326234818,
0.046364925801754,
-0.045737214386463165,
0.07495758682489395,
-0.0594598650932312,
0.014318980276584625,
-0.024481510743498802,
-0.024388911202549934,
-0.05414193123579025,
0.011433287523686886,
-0.00129404675681144,
-0.06223040074110031,
-0.04602992907166481,
0.04293719306588173,
-0.02619006112217903,
-0.018961641937494278,
-0.023997848853468895,
0.04860258102416992,
-0.006322829984128475,
-0.0009533055126667023,
-0.021862292662262917,
-0.011109188199043274,
-0.05006314441561699,
-0.015016820281744003,
0.0012292186729609966,
-0.013356720097362995,
-0.11148077249526978,
0.09049070626497269,
0.009167509153485298,
0.11391999572515488,
0.005477460101246834,
0.05041927099227905,
0.01529006939381361,
-0.16939657926559448,
-0.007584116421639919,
-0.010136568918824196,
-0.0636434480547905,
-0.06484565138816833,
0.005944487173110247,
-0.08234663307666779,
0.014550301246345043,
-0.003659890964627266,
0.10708101093769073,
0.061699703335762024,
-0.014353308826684952,
-0.044591885060071945,
0.07044556736946106,
-0.05366038531064987,
-0.09928681701421738,
-0.020176399499177933,
-0.006414694245904684,
0.044936683028936386,
0.07916183024644852,
0.060019176453351974,
-0.03847634792327881,
0.08786660432815552,
-0.02749839797616005,
-0.06212719529867172,
-0.12249424308538437,
-0.09752284735441208,
-0.06644871085882187,
0.027442986145615578,
0.030347196385264397,
0.0009204793605022132,
-0.06487198919057846,
0.0338180772960186,
0.00851356703788042,
-0.06809966266155243,
0.024936756119132042,
0.03675924986600876,
-0.060480184853076935,
-0.013169573619961739,
0.040585681796073914,
-0.07388827204704285,
-0.0026497768703848124,
0.051122795790433884,
0.03071959875524044,
-0.03548320755362511,
-0.048126060515642166,
0.003924380987882614,
0.008410684764385223,
4.342079603975752e-33,
-0.041068222373723984,
0.01101231761276722,
-0.00840156339108944,
-0.03132406249642372,
0.0592183843255043,
0.02894400991499424,
-0.005340128671377897,
-0.02305271476507187,
-0.025267282500863075,
0.021917670965194702,
-0.04639683663845062,
0.018780935555696487,
-0.05442675203084946,
0.0037969984114170074,
0.0028977240435779095,
0.031826138496398926,
0.0305218156427145,
0.04615364223718643,
0.02480153553187847,
-0.004570749122649431,
0.00945858284831047,
-0.049815982580184937,
-0.003023897996172309,
0.011114224791526794,
0.058753348886966705,
-0.04333413019776344,
-0.03711346164345741,
0.04540744423866272,
0.028455713763833046,
0.02817240171134472,
0.08542636036872864,
-0.030365105718374252,
0.028831252828240395,
0.04145786166191101,
0.01627899892628193,
0.027590567246079445,
-0.029253661632537842,
-0.064722940325737,
0.05996625870466232,
0.028251098468899727,
0.017062706872820854,
0.06487248837947845,
0.02854083478450775,
0.041071817278862,
-0.01256739441305399,
-0.02883509173989296,
0.017733417451381683,
0.08802062273025513,
0.02484224922955036,
0.038885314017534256,
0.05281263217329979,
-0.0010512926382943988,
0.05487354099750519,
-0.050118934363126755,
-0.043914929032325745,
0.03287200629711151,
-0.08034823089838028,
-0.039628732949495316,
-0.06222812458872795,
-0.02779969945549965,
0.0643339678645134,
0.08747506886720657,
-0.043135903775691986,
0.021700086072087288,
-0.04260873794555664,
0.06803938746452332,
0.025784963741898537,
-0.027933156117796898,
-0.008245846256613731,
-0.07317101210355759,
0.024320483207702637,
-0.011181880719959736,
0.0323108434677124,
-0.013598883524537086,
0.05101374164223671,
-0.03227575495839119,
0.045116785913705826,
0.04944074526429176,
0.031721025705337524,
-0.046104755252599716,
-0.05925667658448219,
-0.016918854787945747,
0.0008501799893565476,
0.11383666098117828,
-0.04100819304585457,
0.0016900468617677689,
0.07008743286132812,
-0.03458505496382713,
0.07195183634757996,
0.038534607738256454,
0.019566036760807037,
0.010037215426564217,
-0.023051641881465912,
0.006633184850215912,
0.030604466795921326,
-6.243534653952914e-33,
-0.033531416207551956,
0.014160406775772572,
-0.031934257596731186,
-0.042542465031147,
-0.0937948226928711,
0.006012841127812862,
-0.058705318719148636,
-0.022700315341353416,
-0.0078433183953166,
-0.09425931423902512,
-0.07702745497226715,
-0.037703368812799454,
0.037065278738737106,
-0.09989693015813828,
-0.08505185693502426,
0.03833828121423721,
0.04005046933889389,
0.060587044805288315,
-0.06931892037391663,
-0.04670907184481621,
0.02764524705708027,
0.09211663156747818,
0.12122290581464767,
0.09270112961530685,
-0.028260910883545876,
-0.0167531818151474,
0.007034401409327984,
0.06583825498819351,
-0.007235805969685316,
-0.055080682039260864,
0.029403148218989372,
-0.06917952746152878,
-0.07418420910835266,
0.024363627657294273,
-0.01154952310025692,
-0.13523995876312256,
0.0658545270562172,
0.029095688834786415,
0.05408520624041557,
0.04762253165245056,
0.022077612578868866,
0.01748480275273323,
-0.023288972675800323,
0.10541515797376633,
-0.01974823884665966,
-0.05171624943614006,
-0.034200530499219894,
-0.045001812279224396,
0.06918974220752716,
0.012598731555044651,
-0.11872757226228714,
-0.0017235582927241921,
-0.026504240930080414,
-0.015274900011718273,
-0.07757187634706497,
0.11711172759532928,
0.0929582342505455,
-0.01774553395807743,
-0.03357686102390289,
0.010658441111445427,
0.04109068214893341,
0.0874214842915535,
-0.03203003481030464,
-0.04646541178226471,
0.0916527733206749,
-0.06195973977446556,
0.010862304829061031,
-0.04913622885942459,
0.02934275195002556,
0.009219063445925713,
0.02259013056755066,
-0.08455965667963028,
-0.05466483160853386,
-0.049850355833768845,
-0.05240871012210846,
0.0158526748418808,
-0.02713417075574398,
-0.04325452819466591,
-0.06728450208902359,
0.04008670896291733,
-0.029408805072307587,
0.027698712423443794,
0.006221693474799395,
0.04568616673350334,
0.050783030688762665,
-0.07446011155843735,
0.042253460735082626,
-0.03999674320220947,
0.0499860905110836,
0.03500517085194588,
-0.023228945210576057,
-0.026472974568605423,
0.048825252801179886,
0.06212591379880905,
0.002009039046242833,
-6.020365361791846e-8,
0.010052905417978764,
0.03258573263883591,
0.01664203219115734,
0.07494951039552689,
0.11532284319400787,
-0.011369433254003525,
-0.015392269939184189,
-0.0015016664983704686,
-0.01270286738872528,
-0.023549236357212067,
0.008769745007157326,
0.023883135989308357,
-0.11716055870056152,
-0.03793083131313324,
-0.01172848604619503,
-0.06949307024478912,
0.050884976983070374,
0.0002182932512369007,
-0.09535210579633713,
-0.0003373349900357425,
-0.04584437608718872,
-0.00397849828004837,
0.03890044987201691,
0.011134102009236813,
-0.014400691725313663,
-0.09444908797740936,
0.08444901555776596,
0.05000164732336998,
0.038199570029973984,
0.06418357789516449,
-0.017724206671118736,
0.04369855299592018,
0.06568330526351929,
0.028928276151418686,
-0.022238625213503838,
-0.06261001527309418,
-0.07014862447977066,
0.005171989556401968,
-0.04074942693114281,
0.05176118016242981,
-0.020015284419059753,
0.015720920637249947,
-0.02817836031317711,
0.08745647966861725,
0.09172353148460388,
-0.026334891095757484,
-0.05420047789812088,
-0.011297435499727726,
0.03622235730290413,
0.021648848429322243,
0.02636585384607315,
0.002791933948174119,
0.04478561878204346,
0.05999791994690895,
0.006276580039411783,
-0.01748400740325451,
0.0018235321622341871,
0.06206251308321953,
0.07645639032125473,
-0.00020043096446897835,
0.011718552559614182,
0.028386222198605537,
0.02933908812701702,
-0.002806764794513583
] | {
"pdf_file": "OMIUL266TMW75QUBWV2CUTRL56PSFGDK.pdf",
"text": "3227 CFR Ch. IX (1 –1–01 Edition) §932.60\nREPORTS AND RECORDS\n§932.60 Reports of acquisitions, sales,\nuses, shipments and creditablebrand advertising.\n(a) Each handler shall file such re-\nports of his acquisitions, sales, uses,and shipments of olives, as may be re-quested by the committee.\n(b) Upon the request of the com-\nmittee, each handler shall furnish suchother reports and information as areneeded to enable the committee to per-form its functions under this part.\n(c) Each handler shall file such re-\nports of creditable brand advertising asrecommended by the committee andapproved by the Secretary.\n[30 FR 12629, Oct. 2, 1965, as amended at 47 FR\n51094, Nov. 12, 1982]\n§932.61 Records.\nEach handler shall maintain such\nrecords of olives acquired, held, anddisposed of by such handler as may beprescribed by the committee and need-ed by it to perform its functions underthis subpart. Such records shall be re-tained for at least two years beyondthe crop year in which the transaction\noccurred. The committee, with the ap-proval of the Secretary, may prescriberules and regulations to include underthis section handler records that detailadvertising and promotion activitieswhich the committee may need to per-form its functions under §932.45(a).\n[47 FR 51094, Nov. 12, 1982]\n§932.62 Verification of reports.\nFor the purpose of checking and\nverifying reports filed by handlers, thecommittee, through its duly authorizedrepresentatives, shall have access toany handler ’s premises during regular\nbusiness hours, and shall be permittedat any such time to: (a) Inspect suchpremises and any olives held by suchhandler, and any and all records of thehandler with respect to such handler ’s\nacquisition, sales, uses and shipmentsof olives; and (b) inspect any and allrecords of such handler with respect toadvertising and promotion activitiessubject to §932.45(a) and maintained by\nthe handler pursuant to §932.61. Each\nhandler shall furnish all labor andequipment necessary to make such in-\nspections.\n[47 FR 51094, Nov. 12, 1982]\n§932.63 Confidential information.\nAll reports and information sub-\nmitted by handlers pursuant to theprovisions of this part shall be receivedby, and at all times be in the custodyof one or more designated employees ofthe committee. No such employeesshall disclose to any person, other thanthe Secretary upon request therefor,data, or information obtained or ex-tracted from such reports and recordswhich might affect the trade position,financial condition, or business oper-ation of the particular handler fromwhom received: Provided, That such\ndata and information may be com-bined, and made available in the formof general reports in which the identi-ties of the individual handlers fur-nishing the information is not dis-closed.\nM\nISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS\n§932.65 Compliance.\nExcept as provided in this part, no\nperson shall handle olives, the handlingof which has been prohibited by theSecretary in accordance with the pro-visions of this part, and no person shallhandle olives except in conformitywith the provisions of this part and theregulations issued hereunder.\n§932.66 Right of the Secretary.\nThe members of the committee (in-\ncluding successors and alternates) andany agents or employees appointed oremployed by the committee, shall besubject to removal or suspension atany time by the Secretary. Each andevery order, regulation, determination,decision, or other act of the committeeshall be subject to the continuing rightof the Secretary to disapprove of thesame at any time. Upon such dis-approval, such disapproved action shallbe deemed null and void except as toacts done in reliance thereon or incompliance therewith prior to such dis-approval by the Secretary.\nVerDate 11<MAY>2000 12:50 Jan 22, 2001 Jkt 194017 PO 00000 Frm 00322 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\\SGML\\194017T.XXX pfrm02 PsN: 194017T"
} |
[
-0.0732894316315651,
0.022334907203912735,
0.05245264992117882,
0.032260965555906296,
-0.03865266591310501,
0.08416732400655746,
-0.00605621375143528,
-0.01309976913034916,
-0.01901736482977867,
-0.018037274479866028,
0.004792880732566118,
-0.0071998098865151405,
0.07289697974920273,
-0.08265114575624466,
0.02079106867313385,
0.021236874163150787,
0.10895811766386032,
0.06386899203062057,
-0.009391357190907001,
0.1289970576763153,
0.022371703758835793,
0.012255675159394741,
-0.1145172044634819,
0.002801782451570034,
0.029228610917925835,
0.04146112501621246,
-0.11527229100465775,
-0.03918980434536934,
-0.023842191323637962,
0.04857824370265007,
0.04677491635084152,
0.02721436135470867,
-0.05195951461791992,
0.06573537737131119,
0.09696760028600693,
0.026853298768401146,
-0.009930064901709557,
0.08181685954332352,
-0.060018301010131836,
-0.05909837409853935,
-0.11340368539094925,
-0.06713501363992691,
0.05595390498638153,
0.008111655712127686,
-0.030392572283744812,
-0.02550468035042286,
0.026728635653853416,
-0.030305175110697746,
-0.03309154883027077,
0.006424504332244396,
-0.0642843171954155,
-0.011326278559863567,
0.008788174949586391,
0.05805717781186104,
0.014025341719388962,
0.016090895980596542,
0.04696435481309891,
0.04238716885447502,
-0.07501883804798126,
-0.022618252784013748,
-0.013212064281105995,
-0.038619160652160645,
-0.036331623792648315,
0.008854457177221775,
-0.016225483268499374,
0.03814302012324333,
-0.0418131947517395,
-0.09781783819198608,
0.06144530326128006,
-0.1139601320028305,
0.023804087191820145,
0.02032650262117386,
-0.0052804723381996155,
0.02340909279882908,
0.04922438785433769,
0.06800626218318939,
0.05048288404941559,
0.06845784187316895,
0.11525991559028625,
-0.056415166705846786,
0.0193017665296793,
0.041700150817632675,
-0.04650125280022621,
0.06674521416425705,
0.04750142991542816,
-0.0007113476167432964,
-0.02969200350344181,
-0.05742437765002251,
0.024571597576141357,
0.009294661693274975,
0.12174256145954132,
0.021257538348436356,
0.031864769756793976,
-0.06905864179134369,
0.06737945973873138,
-0.030622242018580437,
0.018478134647011757,
-0.09483775496482849,
-0.0054872240871191025,
0.02464347332715988,
-0.04790433496236801,
0.034253764897584915,
0.01398226898163557,
-0.026801908388733864,
0.08039640635251999,
-0.019142085686326027,
-0.0005917363450862467,
0.006502117961645126,
-0.02955995313823223,
-0.018082330003380775,
0.059517327696084976,
-0.03130407631397247,
-0.056923411786556244,
0.05231476575136185,
-0.01002340018749237,
0.00848499033600092,
0.0032123697455972433,
0.036410219967365265,
0.044306620955467224,
-0.06444034725427628,
-0.028669947758316994,
0.05955217033624649,
-0.08355258405208588,
-0.015595848672091961,
-0.025222182273864746,
0.009022294543683529,
0.05343083292245865,
4.2913658389454014e-33,
0.023160140961408615,
0.04756132885813713,
0.06665308028459549,
-0.036027438938617706,
0.046852972358465195,
-0.04980335012078285,
0.005280581768602133,
-0.05629098415374756,
0.052745480090379715,
0.04591087996959686,
-0.045907892286777496,
0.10431073606014252,
0.1029936745762825,
-0.04811006784439087,
-0.08090844750404358,
-0.006040274631232023,
-0.04335012286901474,
0.03480152040719986,
-0.00521376496180892,
0.12601140141487122,
0.06985373795032501,
-0.012090334668755531,
0.07218139618635178,
0.000954139104578644,
0.014010610058903694,
0.002239103429019451,
-0.018680058419704437,
-0.012391536496579647,
-0.012177690863609314,
-0.01911170221865177,
-0.04859239608049393,
-0.01692822389304638,
0.1277678906917572,
-0.07997149229049683,
0.07178781926631927,
-0.04183736443519592,
0.1112966388463974,
-0.07536192238330841,
-0.03125648945569992,
-0.08961768448352814,
-0.055215850472450256,
0.05172504484653473,
0.11694721132516861,
0.04680025577545166,
-0.08779040724039078,
-0.023888716474175453,
0.019324317574501038,
-0.009225722402334213,
0.007132275961339474,
0.059869639575481415,
-0.020759064704179764,
0.09325861185789108,
-0.03827564790844917,
0.05921199917793274,
-0.0804988294839859,
-0.03914288431406021,
0.05651681125164032,
0.00745923537760973,
0.0732249766588211,
-0.025951694697141647,
0.02563776820898056,
-0.08519212156534195,
0.04947889968752861,
-0.11309830099344254,
0.06909959763288498,
-0.05196262523531914,
-0.002304683905094862,
-0.01972869038581848,
0.009419946931302547,
-0.026987308636307716,
-0.0015980664175003767,
0.055757150053977966,
0.08373768627643585,
-0.07192972302436829,
-0.019971711561083794,
0.008490139618515968,
0.013331923633813858,
0.03576057776808739,
0.009049644693732262,
-0.046917401254177094,
-0.04064662382006645,
-0.005256586242467165,
0.03309958800673485,
0.03416356071829796,
0.055603332817554474,
0.08132262527942657,
-0.006920816842466593,
-0.036104824393987656,
-0.06466501951217651,
-0.06632930785417557,
0.03645332157611847,
0.013168051838874817,
0.09163857251405716,
0.057663027197122574,
-0.020177891477942467,
-3.959866513779931e-33,
-0.048386819660663605,
-0.0481509305536747,
-0.026481861248612404,
-0.08928943425416946,
-0.012105504050850868,
-0.02420678175985813,
-0.03645096346735954,
-0.0695771723985672,
0.004523518495261669,
-0.010667468421161175,
0.055668797343969345,
-0.01057926844805479,
-0.0067205410450696945,
-0.017852570861577988,
-0.10337715595960617,
0.051221415400505066,
0.020566675812005997,
0.04818935692310333,
0.04681733250617981,
0.009839213453233242,
0.02179768495261669,
0.10794505476951599,
0.06015685200691223,
0.10260536521673203,
0.07523390650749207,
0.07378113269805908,
0.05743207037448883,
-0.06221894919872284,
-0.027439234778285027,
-0.016300993040204048,
0.08502912521362305,
-0.05038496479392052,
-0.03461733087897301,
0.02500217780470848,
0.03411160781979561,
-0.044036250561475754,
0.030081596225500107,
-0.032796554267406464,
0.015665002167224884,
0.02522137574851513,
0.08223745971918106,
0.021934399381279945,
-0.057462431490421295,
0.0322297140955925,
0.02615060657262802,
-0.049248550087213516,
-0.005791394505649805,
0.029092149809002876,
-0.002161861164495349,
0.029861195012927055,
-0.0014126439346000552,
-0.10070154070854187,
0.005708656739443541,
0.09723801165819168,
0.019804013893008232,
0.006695485208183527,
0.1024336889386177,
-0.01999431662261486,
0.002544549060985446,
-0.055618252605199814,
-0.057999785989522934,
0.04818720370531082,
-0.06936714798212051,
-0.060028474777936935,
0.07742823660373688,
-0.024005625396966934,
-0.048800867050886154,
-0.10058660805225372,
0.016873180866241455,
-0.03457926586270332,
-0.07941293716430664,
-0.07420849800109863,
0.013423552736639977,
-0.0955774337053299,
0.109018974006176,
0.029638396576046944,
0.012089882977306843,
-0.035878296941518784,
-0.08431824296712875,
0.03137492015957832,
-0.05715656653046608,
0.018992573022842407,
-0.006362274754792452,
-0.029609251767396927,
-0.0101038608700037,
0.0054562510922551155,
0.09147222340106964,
-0.0366084910929203,
0.03356179967522621,
0.03315266594290733,
-0.03368265554308891,
-0.015036754310131073,
0.032959092408418655,
0.03202288970351219,
-0.0016093149315565825,
-5.4680512562299555e-8,
0.05294938012957573,
0.07109427452087402,
-0.08706676959991455,
-0.004667784087359905,
0.0011314669391140342,
-0.008894247002899647,
-0.04467683285474777,
0.021526820957660675,
-0.041731663048267365,
-0.06112641841173172,
-0.005942662712186575,
0.030323320999741554,
-0.027872174978256226,
-0.09845246374607086,
0.03274980187416077,
-0.06292767077684402,
-0.05259586125612259,
-0.07562629878520966,
-0.055718984454870224,
0.0047396039590239525,
-0.002345010172575712,
-0.03870499134063721,
-0.04677848890423775,
-0.011230836622416973,
-0.06344574689865112,
0.04384482651948929,
-0.037197742611169815,
0.019555069506168365,
-0.013244313187897205,
-0.01966848224401474,
-0.054013241082429886,
0.003526750486344099,
-0.042379721999168396,
0.03171557933092117,
-0.021823350340127945,
-0.04060908779501915,
0.03219498693943024,
-0.04719768092036247,
0.019144538789987564,
0.014188923873007298,
-0.0032262022141367197,
-0.017770307138562202,
0.05114436894655228,
0.035881537944078445,
-0.0033266402315348387,
0.06527311354875565,
-0.06065227463841438,
-0.0637536570429802,
0.03581501543521881,
-0.04412566497921944,
0.017697934061288834,
-0.013539266772568226,
-0.03430315852165222,
0.050742655992507935,
-0.03335068002343178,
-0.07193172723054886,
0.01242255698889494,
-0.03126521408557892,
-0.015452897176146507,
0.015583670698106289,
-0.02474820986390114,
-0.02020384557545185,
-0.03072834201157093,
0.0024326625280082226
] | {
"pdf_file": "HGB546MCYLA3JJLIKLP5WGEFY6DUY5ML.pdf",
"text": "Constituent Service Success Stories\nMy office is here to help you with issues and problems you may be having with an agency of the\nfederal government, such as obtaining benefits and services from the Department of Veterans\nAffairs, Social Security Administration, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, as well as\nassistance with military service records and medals, and passport issues. I invite you to read\nthe following examples of how I’ve been able to help constituents and if you are in need of\nassistance, please visit my Help with a Federal Agency page to contact me directly.\n Melissa McIlrath, Stockton\n \nMs. McIlrath contacted my office in June 2008 because she had yet to receive benefits from the\nSocial Security Administration seven months after they determined she was eligible. My staff\nimmediately contacted the local Social Security office and explained Ms. McIlrath’s situation.\n \nUpon making an initial inquiry, my office was able to determine that Ms. McIlrath’s benefit\npayment had been issued twice to an incorrect address. As it turned out, she was eligible to\nreceive benefits in excess of $45,000. A swift correction to the problem was made and Ms.\nMcIlrath received the back payments.\n Paula Anderson, Brentwood\n \nMrs. Anderson first contacted my office in June 2008 regarding Social Security disability\nbenefits. The Social Security Administration had ruled the previous April that Mrs. Anderson\nwas entitled to benefits, but to date she had not received any.\n \nAfter waiting more than 60 days for her settlement payment, Mrs. Anderson and her family were\nencountering financial straits and were close to losing their home.\n \nMy staff called the local Social Security Administration office and Mrs. Anderson’s payment was\nexpedited. Soon thereafter, she received a $40,000 lump sum payment.\n \nMrs. Anderson was thankful to receive the funds and said, \"We really appreciated it and the\nCongressman totally jumping on it as we almost lost our home.\"\n Frank Alvarez, Tracy\n 1 / 6 Constituent Service Success Stories\n \nMr. Alvarez is a Vietnam veteran who was awarded a non-service connected pension by the VA\nin 2004. The VA determined that he was permanently and totally disabled and unable to obtain\ngainful employment.\n \nHe is also the father of two young boys, one biological and one adopted. He took them both in\nwhen their mother passed away in August 2005. Due to their mother’s death, each of the boys\nreceives a small monthly survivor benefit from the Social Security Administration. The VA\nconsidered the children’s survivor benefits as part of Mr. Alvarez’s income and thus determined\nthat his monthly income of just under $17,000 exceeded the VA limit for pension eligibility –\neven though the limit was exceeded by just $490.\n \nMr. Alvarez contacted my office in January 2008 after the VA made this determination and\ninformed him of the need to repay what the VA considered an overage.\n \nMy staff helped Mr. Alvarez submit his request for a waiver of overpayment to the VA Pension\nCenter. After evaluating the case and the circumstances, the VA granted Mr. Alvarez’s waiver\nrequest. However, due to a bureaucratic snafu the VA continued to collect money from Mr.\nAlvarez.\n \nMy staff then contacted the Pension Center to get a formal letter issued to the VA Debt\nManagement Center, so that Mr. Alvarez’s records would reflect that the overpayment was\nwaived. The Debt Management Center updated their records and Mr. Alvarez will now receive\nhis pension in the full amount as well as a refund of the money that was previously deducted.\n Gary Fulkerson, Acampo\n \nMr. Fulkerson contacted my office in April 2008 after his wife received a letter from the VA\nstating that he was deceased and she would need to repay $5,520 in veterans benefits.\n \nMy staff immediately contacted the VA and was informed that the VA’s records indicated that\nMr. Fulkerson had passed away in February of 2008. Fortunately, my staff was able to provide\nthe VA with a copy of Mr. Fulkerson’s signed privacy release form, indicating that in fact Mr.\nFulkerson is alive and well and entitled to continue receiving VA benefits.\n 2 / 6 Constituent Service Success Stories\n \nMr. Fulkerson’s benefits were reinstated and the VA will now require a certified death certificate\nfrom Mr. Fulkerson’s family before terminating his benefits.\n Antoinette Muti, Pleasanton\n \nMrs. Muti is the surviving spouse of Mr. Michael Muti, a Merchant Marine who served during\nWorld War II. In February 2007, after Mr. Muti passed away, Mrs. Muti applied for a VA pension\nas the surviving spouse of a veteran. She had already spent the previous four months waiting\nfor the Coast Guard to provide her with documentation verifying her husband’s service, which\nshe needed in order to submit her claim to the VA.\n \nShe reached out to my office in October 2007 after having received letter after letter from the\nVA apologizing for the delay in processing her claim. My staff contacted the VA Pension Center\nand requested the expedited processing of Ms. Muti’s claim. The VA approved Ms. Muti’s claim\nfor spousal pension for ongoing monthly benefits as well as a retroactive payment.\n \nI’m grateful for the opportunity to help Mrs. Muti and pleased that she will now receive monthly\npayments and a retroactive payment to account for the time she waited for the claim to be\nprocessed.\n Dennis Wilson, Acampo\n \nMr. Wilson arrived at my office in July of 2007 after driving from his home in Acampo all the way\nto the Pleasanton. In December 2006, he was denied a claim for social security benefits despite\nboth having suffered a stroke which impairs his vision and facing vascular dementia which\nprevents him from working.\n \nMy office was able to expedite a hearing date for Mr. Wilson, which was held in January. In\nMarch, Mr. Wilson still hadn’t heard anything and contacted the office again, asking for\nassistance with securing a decision as soon as possible. He was concerned about being able to\nmake his April mortgage payment.\n \nMy office contacted the Social Security Administration for a status check and we were told that\nMr. Wilson was determined to be disabled after his hearing in January. He was also determined\n 3 / 6 Constituent Service Success Stories\nto be eligible for retroactive payments due to the date of his disability.\n \nMr. Wilson received a lump sum payment in and is now receiving regular benefits on a monthly\nbasis. He was very thankful for the help and I’m honored that we were able to assist him.\n Michael Carney, Stockton\n \nMr. Carney, a Vietnam veteran, originally contacted my office in September 2007 to request\nassistance with an appeal he had filed in response to the VA’s denial of his Post Traumatic\nStress Disorder claim. He was initially granted a 30 percent disability rating for PTSD, but\nbelieved that it should have been more.\n \nMr. Carney is a former employee of San Joaquin County. He was granted a medical retirement\nas a result of his disabilities. According to Mr. Carney, the Social Security Administration also\nrecognizes him as permanently disabled.\n \nAfter reviewing the case, I worked with my staff to write a letter on Mr. Carney’s behalf to the VA\nBoard of Veterans Appeals, requesting a review of his situation.\n \nI was lucky enough to meet Mr. Carney at a Congress at Your Corner event I held in Manteca.\nWhen we talked at the time, I told him that I was proud to be able to advocate on his behalf and\nin return, he told me, \"Without your assistance, I'd still be where I was eight years ago: nowhere\n.\"\n Evelyn Jansen, Discovery Bay\n \nMrs. Jansen of Discovery Bay contacted my office to seek assistance in dealing with the Social\nSecurity Administration. Her husband was receiving Social Security disability benefits until he\npassed away on July 21, 2007. With the passing of her husband, Mrs. Jansen was without any\nsource of income and her monthly bills were becoming more than she could handle.\n \nMrs. Jansen thought she would continue to receive her husband’s benefits but the local Social\nSecurity office informed her that she was ineligible because of her age. She was 57 at the\ntime. This news couldn’t have come at a worse time given that she was facing unpaid medical\n 4 / 6 Constituent Service Success Stories\nbills and mounting financial hardship.\n \nI worked with my staff to make an inquiry on Mrs. Jansen’s behalf. We were told that, in fact,\nMrs. Jansen is not entitled to Social Security disability because of her age. However, due to the\ninquiry, the Social Security Administration determined that she was entitled to nearly $13,000 in\nunpaid disability benefits for her late husband.\n \nMrs. Jansen was overwhelmed upon hearing the news and I’m proud that we were able to\nassist her.\n Robert Vannatter, Pleasanton\n \nI originally met Mr. Vannatter when I went to the Pleasanton Gardens Senior Center. He asked\nme for help in verifying the medals he earned during his service with the U.S. Army during\nWorld War II. \n As a member of the 507th Parachute Infantry Regiment, Mr. Vannatter participated in the Allied\noperations at Normandy. He said that during the battle he lost a pair of pants. I didn’t ask him\nwhether they were the ones he was wearing at the time.\n \nUnbeknownst to him, the pants were recovered, and, years later, were placed on display at a\nmuseum in France as part of a World War II exhibit. \n Recently, a visiting scholar from New York was at the French museum and examined the\npants for identifying characteristics. He found Mr. Vannatter’s Army Identification number on\nthe underside of the belt buckle. The scholar was able to track down Mr. Vannatter’s name and\ncontact information through the U.S. Army and National Personnel Records Center (NPRC). \n Mr. Vannatter was then asked to provide a memory of his experience in World War II to\nsupplement the museum exhibit in France. He recalled having earned a Bronze Star but was\nnot certain. In the interest of making his memoirs as accurate as possible, he asked me for help\nin seeking verification of his military awards.\n I worked with my staff to submit a request to the NPRC to review Mr. Vannatter’s eligibility for\nvarious medals and marks of distinction. The NPRC was able to verify that Mr. Vannatter did in\nfact earn a Bronze Star for his service at Normandy. They mailed the medal to my district office\nin Pleasanton, along with the European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal.\n \n 5 / 6 Constituent Service Success Stories\nI was lucky enough to then be able to present Mr. Vannatter with the Bronze Star, the Armed\nForces’ fourth highest combat award, earned for his service during World War II.\n \n \n \n 6 / 6"
} |
[
-0.028116226196289062,
-0.007545270025730133,
0.07033082097768784,
0.020534299314022064,
0.07461095601320267,
-0.017835762351751328,
-0.03978632763028145,
0.039943158626556396,
-0.016013983637094498,
-0.04032163321971893,
-0.09826342016458511,
-0.0765407457947731,
-0.06310048699378967,
0.006295978091657162,
-0.046610355377197266,
0.044036865234375,
0.03830089420080185,
-0.03145746514201164,
-0.00274676620028913,
-0.005326303653419018,
-0.04945162311196327,
0.10133955627679825,
-0.04407273605465889,
0.019180841743946075,
-0.058032672852277756,
0.06258516758680344,
-0.09297537803649902,
-0.03402725234627724,
-0.02292160876095295,
-0.0072422088123857975,
-0.0038099323865026236,
0.04092102125287056,
0.011488047428429127,
-0.03469568118453026,
0.09292429685592651,
0.10379118472337723,
-0.0006426841136999428,
-0.0425797738134861,
-0.012977656908333302,
0.03279978781938553,
-0.01089166384190321,
-0.07353182882070541,
0.026958556845784187,
-0.05504566803574562,
-0.07673773914575577,
-0.024073412641882896,
0.0402551032602787,
-0.04960961639881134,
0.013208581134676933,
-0.01947973482310772,
0.03844786435365677,
0.0024318157229572535,
-0.047734785825014114,
-0.02553408406674862,
-0.0072439443320035934,
-0.06351017951965332,
-0.03199737146496773,
-0.03506314381957054,
-0.019031723961234093,
-0.004154722671955824,
0.06730633974075317,
0.0022666752338409424,
-0.04350738227367401,
0.06780493259429932,
0.0033846008591353893,
0.04900658503174782,
-0.07114381343126297,
0.0062519642524421215,
0.037242040038108826,
-0.11578275263309479,
0.07193117588758469,
0.03368254005908966,
0.006059571169316769,
-0.1197790578007698,
-0.006720013916492462,
0.07709785550832748,
0.022780340164899826,
0.02789592742919922,
0.04026392847299576,
-0.09949204325675964,
0.047878485172986984,
-0.02636580914258957,
-0.007351462263613939,
-0.04739759862422943,
0.05930539593100548,
0.029363764449954033,
0.022488312795758247,
-0.002222946844995022,
-0.01820484921336174,
0.03331154212355614,
0.004678882192820311,
-0.0220264233648777,
0.034709833562374115,
0.04284172132611275,
0.06310230493545532,
0.04658720642328262,
-0.01674792170524597,
0.0014027297729626298,
0.0065250275656580925,
0.02609836868941784,
0.021526897326111794,
0.01780533418059349,
-0.15354225039482117,
-0.13859179615974426,
-0.003594337496906519,
-0.0014241347089409828,
-0.0796852633357048,
0.05294128507375717,
0.0676388293504715,
-0.024783531203866005,
-0.02589903399348259,
-0.016501452773809433,
0.052439555525779724,
-0.005357520654797554,
0.04111187160015106,
-0.01236471626907587,
-0.047505393624305725,
-0.06470179557800293,
-0.03261478245258331,
-0.013394034467637539,
-0.03969809412956238,
-0.04732802137732506,
-0.033475909382104874,
-0.0020989070180803537,
0.016832130029797554,
-0.009197335690259933,
0.0768187940120697,
2.554712709230624e-33,
0.06835015118122101,
0.000561521272175014,
-0.05000954121351242,
-0.04950103536248207,
0.08854204416275024,
0.03549311310052872,
-0.0738556832075119,
-0.0285822544246912,
-0.044716496020555496,
0.02581174485385418,
-0.00520360330119729,
0.01346518099308014,
0.008485964499413967,
0.0032638509292155504,
-0.14896704256534576,
-0.031958114355802536,
-0.03483104333281517,
0.09886164218187332,
-0.06731592118740082,
-0.10752187669277191,
-0.03997325524687767,
0.012809806503355503,
-0.06970027089118958,
-0.006158614531159401,
0.00852813757956028,
0.012357521802186966,
0.03146681934595108,
-0.020279450342059135,
-0.005050096195191145,
0.05118799954652786,
-0.05714786425232887,
-0.05407198891043663,
0.022403979673981667,
-0.0008308498654514551,
0.05986076220870018,
0.04373277723789215,
-0.009376205503940582,
0.009823973290622234,
-0.07211736589670181,
-0.058049276471138,
-0.02786598727107048,
0.01689884252846241,
-0.0030331923626363277,
-0.005075725261121988,
0.03482004627585411,
-0.05759188160300255,
0.1075267493724823,
0.06943035870790482,
0.02072172611951828,
-0.07015243917703629,
-0.020878184586763382,
0.006768836174160242,
-0.03694731742143631,
0.003660098649561405,
0.04434322938323021,
0.007717180531471968,
0.04888041317462921,
0.0034856770653277636,
0.04585333541035652,
0.016483355313539505,
0.04534405469894409,
0.11705049872398376,
-0.06489942967891693,
-0.048995260149240494,
0.016513466835021973,
0.00976622011512518,
0.05033061280846596,
0.031056562438607216,
0.016836440190672874,
-0.015103287994861603,
0.008836028166115284,
-0.04397693648934364,
-0.010629364289343357,
0.02027517557144165,
-0.0135902538895607,
-0.008731810376048088,
0.01910259760916233,
0.04840623587369919,
0.015910865738987923,
0.1195298582315445,
-0.02228458784520626,
0.006672864779829979,
0.13687379658222198,
0.015864230692386627,
-0.05978243798017502,
0.07022207975387573,
0.005178435705602169,
-0.014300324022769928,
-0.03000238910317421,
0.03398847207427025,
-0.023441653698682785,
-0.009756488725543022,
0.0538422130048275,
-0.02924656867980957,
-0.00573082035407424,
-4.1299601790019316e-33,
-0.017972558736801147,
0.023150300607085228,
-0.052937284111976624,
-0.09064968675374985,
-0.048590291291475296,
-0.08436974883079529,
-0.00588816124945879,
0.06058725714683533,
0.008048205636441708,
-0.04351331666111946,
0.012557475827634335,
0.061060041189193726,
0.010683375410735607,
0.01108889002352953,
-0.09506695717573166,
-0.06369276344776154,
0.04142230376601219,
-0.0405450277030468,
-0.05061723291873932,
-0.04064006730914116,
0.0610782727599144,
-0.05207279697060585,
-0.06106137856841087,
0.08032077550888062,
-0.10290297120809555,
0.07045139372348785,
0.07742910832166672,
-0.021969454362988472,
0.01662546768784523,
-0.037491220980882645,
-0.05645178258419037,
0.09401874989271164,
-0.142607644200325,
0.06452451646327972,
-0.0494496114552021,
0.053550850600004196,
0.05050857365131378,
-0.04780907556414604,
-0.11064395308494568,
-0.019359124824404716,
0.0884580984711647,
0.10531716793775558,
-0.005259738769382238,
-0.0292508527636528,
-0.0012113041011616588,
0.04478702321648598,
0.016506796702742577,
0.002971044508740306,
-0.020136725157499313,
0.034852176904678345,
-0.03365004062652588,
-0.011750729754567146,
-0.0017521755071356893,
0.09060843288898468,
-0.02218789979815483,
0.022321617230772972,
0.027958612889051437,
0.015297149308025837,
-0.05395546928048134,
-0.023645799607038498,
0.007726677227765322,
0.09862981736660004,
-0.005713971797376871,
0.004803400486707687,
0.03731826692819595,
0.04387201368808746,
-0.023569688200950623,
-0.01525889616459608,
-0.0027083992026746273,
-0.005554267205297947,
0.025613468140363693,
-0.023502709344029427,
-0.1271718293428421,
-0.0720214769244194,
0.05218560993671417,
0.0005587495979852974,
-0.07888608425855637,
-0.018671158701181412,
-0.06010845676064491,
0.09207504987716675,
0.03636237978935242,
-0.0008425217820331454,
-0.052576083689928055,
0.057583242654800415,
0.10247394442558289,
0.06260719150304794,
0.0005648676306009293,
-0.08796371519565582,
0.021844875067472458,
0.07652796804904938,
-0.11289650201797485,
0.023566873744130135,
-0.11745113879442215,
-0.0036355536431074142,
-0.02743387594819069,
-5.346406695139194e-8,
0.009747144766151905,
0.08002600818872452,
0.020665304735302925,
0.01799502596259117,
-0.020388057455420494,
-0.07253111153841019,
-0.000881691521499306,
0.09217771887779236,
-0.031621821224689484,
0.04377467557787895,
-0.01002834364771843,
-0.049092553555965424,
0.012029767967760563,
-0.0001968758733710274,
-0.02459566481411457,
-0.0015667796833440661,
0.03792555630207062,
-0.061385370790958405,
-0.01117529533803463,
-0.11114132404327393,
0.0730511024594307,
-0.004740780685096979,
0.0637320727109909,
0.022609440609812737,
0.0383773036301136,
0.0013851170660927892,
0.07170320302248001,
0.03562750667333603,
0.03160453587770462,
0.04289327189326286,
0.026527175679802895,
0.04267991706728935,
-0.09478230029344559,
-0.01754613034427166,
0.04195667803287506,
0.03913666680455208,
-0.04757523536682129,
0.05191269889473915,
-0.02530166134238243,
0.030297627672553062,
-0.08830100297927856,
0.08975876122713089,
0.02419421449303627,
0.04007532075047493,
-0.0011574608506634831,
-0.0259446669369936,
-0.027712766081094742,
0.06508658826351166,
0.03435150906443596,
-0.052989982068538666,
0.04777210205793381,
-0.047115132212638855,
-0.01026088371872902,
0.0723193883895874,
0.11655222624540329,
-0.01783415675163269,
0.03519349545240402,
-0.021335506811738014,
-0.08156850188970566,
0.02938663586974144,
0.007670182269066572,
-0.02238169126212597,
-0.03439709171652794,
-0.0008330243290401995
] | {
"pdf_file": "AI27TP7D5YR3E23YDKFKVE27DDUEN5TU.pdf",
"text": "Watch Hearing: BP-Transocean Deepwater Horizon Oil Disaster; Ongoing Response and Environmental Impacts \nThursday, 27 May 2010 10:00\n \n \n \n10:00 AM, 2359 Rayburn House Office Building\n \n \n \nWitness Panel 1:\n \n- Ken Salazar, Secretary, Department of the Interior ( Testimony )\n \n- David Hayes, Deputy Secretary, Department of the Interior\n \nWitness Panel 2:\n \n- Bob Perciasepe, Deputy Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency ( Testimony )\n \n- Tom Strickland, Assistant Secretary, Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Department of the Interior ( Test\nimony\n)\n \n- Marcia McNutt, Director, U.S. Geological Survey ( Testimony )\n \n 1 / 1"
} |
[
-0.03480374440550804,
-0.022874074056744576,
-0.015673067420721054,
0.004455490969121456,
-0.057097166776657104,
-0.00842598732560873,
-0.013357328251004219,
-0.028932839632034302,
-0.038457274436950684,
-0.013429108075797558,
0.01960848458111286,
-0.05889156833291054,
0.05604041367769241,
-0.04164864495396614,
-0.01952909305691719,
0.07503685355186462,
0.04080188646912575,
-0.040438082069158554,
-0.05314017832279205,
0.053840428590774536,
0.015493183396756649,
0.023762650787830353,
-0.053495075553655624,
-0.04014983028173447,
-0.039747435599565506,
0.016699640080332756,
-0.03639550879597664,
0.00974203459918499,
-0.02552417479455471,
-0.02644931897521019,
0.06684882938861847,
-0.03291890397667885,
0.03214169293642044,
-0.05274680256843567,
0.1426015943288803,
0.012881598435342312,
0.07169200479984283,
-0.05082287639379501,
0.035477299243211746,
-0.010811134241521358,
0.010430608876049519,
0.024593716487288475,
0.045755207538604736,
0.04998912289738655,
-0.04393070936203003,
0.06932482123374939,
-0.011756591498851776,
-0.029179750010371208,
0.004480551462620497,
-0.04401760175824165,
-0.010329598560929298,
0.025195473805069923,
0.05669927969574928,
0.04758518934249878,
-0.06279302388429642,
-0.02927052043378353,
0.052056893706321716,
0.015089820139110088,
-0.0042031859047710896,
-0.019790934398770332,
0.028196996077895164,
0.028537778183817863,
0.033388279378414154,
0.03418818488717079,
-0.0035669361241161823,
0.0394783690571785,
-0.10657518357038498,
-0.07575095444917679,
0.051337018609046936,
-0.13376057147979736,
0.057239845395088196,
-0.04254322871565819,
-0.099832683801651,
-0.03788617625832558,
0.02192772924900055,
-0.03167087212204933,
-0.0463915653526783,
0.06819362938404083,
0.06747864931821823,
-0.08635561168193817,
-0.09306923300027847,
-0.037255339324474335,
0.07943467795848846,
-0.006520288065075874,
0.03601854667067528,
0.016402430832386017,
-0.02945876121520996,
0.025121493265032768,
0.021362237632274628,
0.008382772095501423,
0.08926782757043839,
-0.10112953186035156,
0.034132491797208786,
-0.008694472722709179,
0.0032739241141825914,
-0.007482845801860094,
-0.006733243353664875,
-0.03962528705596924,
0.0021674390882253647,
0.01045430637896061,
-0.05611039698123932,
-0.034482892602682114,
-0.09186651557683945,
-0.065237857401371,
0.0931311547756195,
0.017477497458457947,
0.03286486864089966,
0.08140797913074493,
-0.07220481336116791,
0.006470405962318182,
0.05167520046234131,
-0.0020855029579252005,
0.023989973589777946,
0.05258038267493248,
0.055574070662260056,
0.06356027722358704,
-0.006931903772056103,
0.020409272983670235,
0.12417762726545334,
-0.09385821223258972,
-0.0288478285074234,
0.04628010094165802,
-0.11573360115289688,
0.01299451943486929,
0.0641825720667839,
0.02085380256175995,
-0.02193141169846058,
1.8915873259149858e-33,
-0.003589915344491601,
-0.0480409637093544,
-0.054541200399398804,
-0.015570848248898983,
0.010945312678813934,
-0.032659485936164856,
0.02976955473423004,
0.03309762850403786,
0.01743784174323082,
0.0036490410566329956,
-0.04591169208288193,
-0.0033524460159242153,
0.03422148898243904,
-0.036016542464494705,
-0.032850515097379684,
0.03399048373103142,
-0.051137056201696396,
-0.013613651506602764,
0.010104205459356308,
-0.03196895122528076,
0.062012381851673126,
-0.02841154858469963,
-0.03470715135335922,
0.04075560346245766,
-0.07882881164550781,
-0.042834870517253876,
-0.03390335291624069,
-0.00429682107642293,
0.05343550443649292,
0.03519761934876442,
0.03573990240693092,
-0.03537900745868683,
0.06944640725851059,
0.058055371046066284,
0.04559876397252083,
0.10205613821744919,
-0.019383752718567848,
0.01373916957527399,
-0.11466646939516068,
0.02529883198440075,
-0.0060035367496311665,
0.01594185084104538,
-0.04656113684177399,
0.016978491097688675,
0.0026638382114470005,
-0.02744162455201149,
0.03419467434287071,
0.082553930580616,
0.030182188376784325,
-0.045974601060152054,
-0.030833518132567406,
0.050043150782585144,
-0.007166176103055477,
0.0375359021127224,
-0.050438158214092255,
-0.0800916850566864,
0.025073515251278877,
0.08711962401866913,
0.042374953627586365,
0.004293509759008884,
-0.016470612958073616,
0.09581030905246735,
-0.0979718491435051,
0.01711699552834034,
-0.09354349970817566,
-0.0447399839758873,
0.06605817377567291,
0.0527857206761837,
0.010002543218433857,
-0.1539672315120697,
-0.003275160677731037,
-0.03511228412389755,
0.05335360765457153,
-0.0016222454141825438,
-0.01228357758373022,
-0.04547310993075371,
0.0378451906144619,
-0.07181251049041748,
0.04279756918549538,
0.0022649522870779037,
-0.0541616752743721,
-0.034296225756406784,
0.006687154993414879,
0.07600262016057968,
0.037989646196365356,
-0.07287214696407318,
0.006715849973261356,
0.0020311602856963873,
-0.020505616441369057,
-0.024889633059501648,
0.041143305599689484,
0.0260666161775589,
0.020817955955863,
0.057435356080532074,
0.0506335012614727,
-3.676372908534105e-33,
-0.025798259302973747,
-0.11273278295993805,
0.03295685350894928,
-0.05674511939287186,
0.01812560111284256,
-0.01821388304233551,
0.025457805022597313,
-0.054481782019138336,
0.0717092901468277,
-0.08993624895811081,
0.006744588725268841,
-0.030883608385920525,
0.007921354845166206,
0.043489355593919754,
-0.05537077784538269,
0.06592921167612076,
-0.04944664612412453,
0.054002657532691956,
-0.0023383789230138063,
0.04571225121617317,
-0.026039503514766693,
0.055010389536619186,
0.0009412367944605649,
0.03342432156205177,
-0.04388420283794403,
0.030215410515666008,
0.010253396816551685,
-0.0032313852570950985,
0.03639525547623634,
-0.006117603275924921,
-0.030194954946637154,
-0.05132308229804039,
-0.09939727187156677,
0.06680797040462494,
-0.08210655301809311,
-0.029214030131697655,
0.05382855236530304,
-0.03408348932862282,
-0.04209577292203903,
0.06995845586061478,
0.0563010536134243,
-0.027226677164435387,
0.018755244091153145,
0.09618677198886871,
-0.011043054983019829,
0.06455597281455994,
0.01819191314280033,
-0.0374305285513401,
-0.022508982568979263,
0.040441468358039856,
-0.021385885775089264,
0.010595669038593769,
0.04853583499789238,
0.10649365186691284,
0.026519006118178368,
0.004297525156289339,
0.09298979490995407,
0.015363624319434166,
-0.05814614146947861,
-0.036375198513269424,
0.005014486610889435,
0.0996696725487709,
0.03285760432481766,
0.044923968613147736,
0.042854294180870056,
0.008651684038341045,
-0.07892212271690369,
-0.03325735777616501,
-0.034828443080186844,
-0.04617742821574211,
-0.06474127620458603,
-0.1325787603855133,
-0.011801320128142834,
-0.08308465778827667,
0.031888145953416824,
-0.010984973981976509,
-0.00585746206343174,
-0.07407800108194351,
-0.09582433849573135,
0.003889428684487939,
0.006332681514322758,
0.011334771290421486,
-0.019876407459378242,
0.06761381775140762,
0.040314897894859314,
0.007627345155924559,
0.047131478786468506,
-0.08140766620635986,
0.0365586057305336,
0.09225306659936905,
-0.03538869693875313,
0.03121473640203476,
-0.045834437012672424,
0.037496160715818405,
0.022263485938310623,
-5.803261160508555e-8,
0.020498868077993393,
-0.02464093081653118,
-0.001098574954085052,
0.025214994326233864,
0.0941254273056984,
-0.01543605886399746,
-0.009314477443695068,
0.04938720539212227,
-0.15221884846687317,
0.04329380765557289,
0.023122169077396393,
0.0187381524592638,
-0.07678184658288956,
-0.06000440940260887,
-0.0512712337076664,
-0.005592745263129473,
0.03607999533414841,
-0.06258242577314377,
0.012791797518730164,
-0.03965817391872406,
-0.06908601522445679,
-0.07225217670202255,
0.042037103325128555,
0.035399019718170166,
-0.08278776705265045,
0.021807879209518433,
-0.0030631248373538256,
-0.04913370683789253,
0.0706331729888916,
-0.034860409796237946,
0.0026026107370853424,
0.08784833550453186,
-0.006788118742406368,
-0.009652629494667053,
-0.04544026032090187,
-0.014772881753742695,
0.009934199042618275,
0.027688680216670036,
0.0051610213704407215,
0.050236351788043976,
-0.08118291199207306,
0.05273508280515671,
-0.0033481749705970287,
0.0026991877239197493,
0.10468599945306778,
-0.004644598811864853,
-0.12113270163536072,
0.008352629840373993,
0.08748973160982132,
-0.016568465158343315,
-0.011062802746891975,
-0.1255834400653839,
0.013551757670938969,
0.07056034356355667,
0.03338470682501793,
0.10156849026679993,
-0.058326561003923416,
-0.08627469092607498,
-0.006035062484443188,
0.06985899060964584,
0.028758350759744644,
0.043554238975048065,
0.07365509122610092,
-0.02683551423251629
] | {
"pdf_file": "CRUX6GOFZIONS7TFHX7MGJWDZ5F636K6.pdf",
"text": "/fu /t-V.~ If\nMOORE SMITH BUXTON & TURCKE , CHARTERED\nATIORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW\n950 W. BANNOCK STREET , SUITE 520; BOISE , ID 83702\nTELEPHONE: (208) 331- 1800 FAX: (208) 331- 1202 www. msbtlaw. com\nSTEPHANIEJ. BONNEY\nSUSAN E. BUXTON'\nPAuLI. FITZER\nMICHAEL c. MOOREI\nBRUCE M. SMITH\nPAULA. TURCKE'\nCARLJ. WITHROE'\"\nTAMMY A. ZOKANJOHN J. McFADDEN\nOf Counsel\n)) Also admitted in California\n+ Also admitted in New Mexico\n. Also admitted in Oregon\n, Also admitted in South Dakota\nIAlso admitted in Washington\nFebruary 23 , 2007 r---c:.---'\n: cO\nIdaho Public Utilities Commission\nO. Box 83720\nBoise ID 83720.....' \nC:.\nc'-, -,. -,. .,---., ' ,\nRE: Case No. UWI- 07-02 ~j)\nApplication and Request to Serve Lanewood Estates \nby United Water Idaho Inc.(, ,\nDear Commissioners:\nThe following constitutes the comments of the City of Eagle in response to the application by\nUnited Water Idaho , Inc. for amendment to its Certificate of Convenience and Necessity No. 143\nto allow extension of service to a development in Ada County known as Lanewood Estates. The\nCity of Eagle objects to the amendment of the Certificate and does not believe that use of the\nModified Procedure requested by United Water is appropriate for this particular proceeding.\nThe Commission should be aware that the City of Eagle and United Water have held meetings to\ndiscuss the particular development which United Water now seeks to serve. These meetings\nincluded discussions of the City of Eagle s municipal water system , its development , and Eagle\nintent to serve Lanewood Estates along with other developments in the City' s expansion area\nwest of Linder Road. The City of Eagle advised United Water that it intended to serve this\ndevelopment for numerous reasons. Notwithstanding Eagle s effort to inform United Water of\nthe City of Eagle s plans, United Water has now applied to the Commission for amendment of its\nCertificate without noting or informing the Commission of these discussions. Further , United\nWaters cursory filing fails to mention these discussions and contains so little information that it\ndoes not inform the Commission or the public of the circumstances and issues involved.\nLanewood Estates , consisting of approximately 190 acres , is located immediately west of Linder\nRoad in Ada County. It is immediately south of , and contiguous to , other developments which\nare in the process of obtaining service by the City of Eagle. February 23, 2007\nPage 2 of 2\nThe development is in the City of Eagle s Area of Impact , as approved by Ada County. It is\nwithin the area covered by the City' s Comprehensive Plan. It is also within the City of Eagle\nservice area as approved by the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality.\nAlthough United Water states in its Application that there are no other water providers with\nexisting facilities in the vicinity of Lanewood Estates capable of providing service according to\nthe time table requested by the developer , United Water omits any mention of what that time\ntable is. In fact , the City of Eagle s municipal system will have a main line immediately adjacent\nto the development. Further the main line will be ready for use by Lanewood Estates by the time\nit completes the local government approval process regardless of whether the development of\nLanewood is pursuant to either County or the City of Eagle procedures.\nWhile United Water asserts that it is capable of extending service to the development by\nextension of main lines located within its current service area , United Water fails to identify\nwhich water rights United Water owns that will be used to serve the development or which wells\nwill deliver the water. Simply extending a pipeline does not adequately explain how United\nWater intends to serve , or whether it is capable of serving, the development. The City of Eagle\nsubmits that it is reasonable to have United Water disclose and appropriate for the Commission\nto examine the water resources to be utilized by United Water and determine whether United\nWater can serve this development and other developments without jeopardizing service to its\ncurrent system and customers. Until such a review is undertaken , United Water s allegation that\nan extension of service into this area is consistent with public convenience and necessity is\nunsupportable. The Application is inconsistent with the City' s Comprehensive Plan , the\nestablishment of the City' s Area of Impact , and the service area approved by the Idaho\nDepartment of Environmental Quality. The City would submit that allowing United Water\nrequested amendment is not consistent with public convenience or necessity and the Application\nshould be denied. Approving the Application without a hearing pursuant to Modified Procedure\ncannot be justified under these circumstances because of the lack of information submitted by\nUnited Water.\nSincerely yours\nMOORE SMITH BUXTON & TURCKE , CHTD.\nBMS/dls\ncc: Joe Miller - McDevitt & Miller\nScott Woodbury"
} |
[
-0.007516814861446619,
-0.02296954020857811,
0.012737815268337727,
-0.0537525899708271,
-0.04188249632716179,
0.01961955428123474,
-0.02348962426185608,
0.026307322084903717,
0.04818697273731232,
-0.011268756352365017,
0.06283595412969589,
0.03357938677072525,
0.030412038788199425,
-0.025374900549650192,
-0.05974593013525009,
-0.033009402453899384,
0.03506852686405182,
-0.05297864228487015,
0.01711888425052166,
0.10715057700872421,
0.0422152578830719,
0.07440336793661118,
-0.04893271252512932,
0.009214148856699467,
-0.03953506052494049,
0.0030341423116624355,
-0.07760414481163025,
-0.07855361700057983,
0.07077701389789581,
-0.007400307338684797,
0.08634200692176819,
-0.058923084288835526,
0.018801545724272728,
-0.05378752946853638,
0.09738343954086304,
0.012400932610034943,
0.02511839009821415,
0.0502755343914032,
-0.042346034198999405,
0.09136359393596649,
-0.008663035929203033,
-0.04026259109377861,
0.023349381983280182,
0.013786915689706802,
-0.020220786333084106,
0.051482610404491425,
-0.05818691849708557,
-0.017911821603775024,
0.01207429263740778,
0.06404571980237961,
0.02349589392542839,
0.022477926686406136,
-0.009029890410602093,
0.10327090322971344,
-0.05682968348264694,
-0.060719504952430725,
0.011346563696861267,
-0.05259738117456436,
-0.08595462888479233,
0.10029622912406921,
-0.033558934926986694,
0.08416145294904709,
0.052498288452625275,
-0.021227266639471054,
-0.0537327378988266,
0.034908585250377655,
0.0022151765879243612,
-0.07975510507822037,
0.07345771789550781,
-0.05308861285448074,
0.010372288525104523,
-0.07099436223506927,
-0.022259799763560295,
0.1194571778178215,
0.002342487685382366,
-0.018011748790740967,
0.019640011712908745,
0.05498809739947319,
0.08627535402774811,
-0.09236402809619904,
-0.07141426205635071,
-0.0032279626466333866,
0.08768774569034576,
-0.025445109233260155,
-0.062458205968141556,
0.031227048486471176,
-0.06697920709848404,
0.057814598083496094,
0.04897274449467659,
-0.09155148267745972,
0.06693359464406967,
-0.034092966467142105,
0.029241779819130898,
-0.09312109649181366,
0.1125909835100174,
-0.010154726915061474,
-0.05974175035953522,
-0.06995633244514465,
0.05150017514824867,
-0.00544864684343338,
-0.036080650985240936,
-0.06835027039051056,
-0.026423215866088867,
0.03360670432448387,
0.024172985926270485,
-0.01889895647764206,
0.013418053276836872,
-0.10398454964160919,
-0.07687980681657791,
0.05017705261707306,
0.056868765503168106,
0.046953339129686356,
0.051510296761989594,
-0.027696456760168076,
0.01640583574771881,
0.06085860729217529,
-0.05863894149661064,
-0.00705821393057704,
0.06995932012796402,
-0.033009856939315796,
-0.08427119255065918,
0.014781594276428223,
-0.04643169417977333,
-0.06601641327142715,
0.051115792244672775,
-0.010444991290569305,
-0.00020507213775999844,
1.7552441238860088e-33,
-0.0005590390646830201,
-0.020141659304499626,
0.009548074565827847,
-0.014781973324716091,
-0.0037877236027270555,
0.07369948923587799,
0.004784732591360807,
-0.026356667280197144,
0.07870473712682724,
0.0020277248695492744,
-0.06112565100193024,
-0.006476800888776779,
0.03495214506983757,
-0.1251015067100525,
-0.04173797369003296,
0.017587313428521156,
0.03900136053562164,
0.04340892657637596,
-0.01191603671759367,
0.07434670627117157,
-0.04407371208071709,
-0.002516950713470578,
-0.03449133783578873,
0.06197503209114075,
-0.08826214075088501,
-0.0013712598010897636,
-0.03422819450497627,
-0.030441274866461754,
0.10773677378892899,
-0.012779204174876213,
0.017498651519417763,
-0.03187861293554306,
0.05500342696905136,
-0.006318224128335714,
0.062226954847574234,
0.061275795102119446,
-0.04210920259356499,
0.07021093368530273,
-0.038709964603185654,
-0.0029096377547830343,
-0.04194086045026779,
-0.025509359315037727,
-0.03207925707101822,
0.050474848598241806,
0.020340681076049805,
0.05702316761016846,
0.0873715877532959,
0.012049381621181965,
-0.03199537470936775,
-0.06632944941520691,
-0.025674941018223763,
0.01901603676378727,
-0.1091814786195755,
-0.023856546729803085,
-0.001844183774664998,
0.00026270057423971593,
0.02131030708551407,
0.017876561731100082,
0.03335639461874962,
0.02190025895833969,
-0.010653720237314701,
0.03819425031542778,
-0.024442162364721298,
-0.01698887161910534,
0.03625493124127388,
-0.06903785467147827,
0.03396349772810936,
-0.07811082154512405,
0.06483234465122223,
-0.10928179323673248,
0.019184323027729988,
-0.006056369282305241,
-0.03328762948513031,
0.00048150052316486835,
0.002136314520612359,
-0.023582160472869873,
0.013913700357079506,
0.011798765510320663,
0.028109585866332054,
-0.012733213603496552,
-0.0052831885404884815,
0.008308892138302326,
-0.0027036513201892376,
0.04284050688147545,
0.09968835860490799,
-0.04299826920032501,
-0.03949392959475517,
0.10359488427639008,
-0.09764788299798965,
0.0036829346790909767,
-0.009220578707754612,
0.0015493753599002957,
0.039871733635663986,
0.029415126889944077,
0.043553873896598816,
-4.043893421370601e-33,
0.01969575695693493,
-0.05454391613602638,
-0.026728946715593338,
0.0035195439122617245,
0.05824871361255646,
-0.0016108944546431303,
0.016334811225533485,
-0.020221572369337082,
-0.04368097335100174,
-0.08398638665676117,
-0.01131138950586319,
-0.04717395082116127,
-0.0167849101126194,
0.013620341196656227,
-0.017148979008197784,
0.025091251358389854,
-0.06983423978090286,
0.039477843791246414,
-0.06909500807523727,
0.0854671373963356,
0.003404065500944853,
0.022653628140687943,
-0.022360926494002342,
0.04529067128896713,
-0.03989335894584656,
0.10312557220458984,
-0.064216248691082,
0.035358089953660965,
0.013731836341321468,
-0.0560024119913578,
-0.03583797439932823,
-0.01590455137193203,
-0.05385255441069603,
0.024570222944021225,
-0.06547197699546814,
-0.060944173485040665,
-0.05460597574710846,
0.018334483727812767,
-0.051086004823446274,
-0.027413466945290565,
0.04911181330680847,
-0.0016231084009632468,
0.024510253220796585,
0.06995388120412827,
0.00035693959216587245,
-0.06982918828725815,
-0.008188709616661072,
-0.07652448117733002,
0.037830814719200134,
-0.02188989520072937,
-0.08508580178022385,
-0.0566115602850914,
0.07069510966539383,
-0.04495758190751076,
-0.023291055113077164,
0.0061385310254991055,
-0.0082713533192873,
-0.01713406853377819,
-0.0313543900847435,
0.017320793122053146,
0.14887237548828125,
-0.0032355929724872112,
-0.09378884732723236,
0.07160215079784393,
-0.050288598984479904,
-0.002838974120095372,
0.060975946485996246,
-0.06741783022880554,
0.04556766152381897,
0.0046762884594500065,
-0.06867169588804245,
-0.06766441464424133,
0.02691601775586605,
-0.10133465379476547,
0.05278461426496506,
0.020297791808843613,
0.1053110659122467,
-0.05033215880393982,
-0.05662442743778229,
-0.05209929868578911,
-0.07022062689065933,
-0.05073833093047142,
-0.006102464627474546,
0.060194309800863266,
-0.043525196611881256,
-0.026001879945397377,
0.08829907327890396,
-0.1180880069732666,
0.020049411803483963,
0.03173130750656128,
0.011307388544082642,
0.05575117841362953,
-0.05155150964856148,
0.05215562507510185,
0.0338355116546154,
-5.53870087571795e-8,
-0.026911597698926926,
0.052465565502643585,
0.008906090632081032,
-0.0181727297604084,
0.03190053999423981,
-0.10101470351219177,
0.007265258580446243,
-0.06004997342824936,
-0.06058931350708008,
0.06461020559072495,
0.0009912668028846383,
0.06762344390153885,
-0.009561187587678432,
-0.02085256576538086,
0.03497588634490967,
0.004552681930363178,
-0.021462813019752502,
0.02948031947016716,
-0.008285707794129848,
0.0030686785466969013,
-0.05904781445860863,
-0.08581297844648361,
0.02392825298011303,
0.012517524883151054,
-0.06132848933339119,
0.04776986315846443,
0.02318711392581463,
0.007058011367917061,
0.06187932938337326,
0.03865201026201248,
0.039796359837055206,
0.0691647008061409,
0.022489435970783234,
0.0035703228786587715,
0.008572187274694443,
-0.12255620211362839,
0.005912225227802992,
0.005741946864873171,
0.04432790353894234,
0.0041328477673232555,
-0.008524267934262753,
0.1274392008781433,
0.036084406077861786,
0.04955993965268135,
0.03463008999824524,
-0.038747698068618774,
-0.05306079611182213,
0.035310566425323486,
0.02838200516998768,
0.030453693121671677,
0.031715039163827896,
-0.08095043152570724,
0.02034836821258068,
-0.05021220073103905,
-0.07003287225961685,
0.09888017177581787,
0.02057885006070137,
-0.00836181826889515,
-0.08142687380313873,
0.059084586799144745,
-0.06428483873605728,
-0.046781495213508606,
0.08670392632484436,
-0.04930688068270683
] | {
"pdf_file": "EMMM5FRYBCPVBLVU4RY6OFEKZFWM2KIJ.pdf",
"text": "CHAPTER 23-16\nLICENSING MEDICAL HOSPITALS\n23-16-01. Licensure of medical hospitals and state hospitals. After July 1, 1947, no\nperson, partnership, association, corporation, limited liability company, county or municipal\ncorporation, or agency thereof, which maintains and operates organized facilities for the\ndiagnosis, treatment, or care of two or more nonrelated persons suffering from illness, injury, or\ndeformity or where obstetrical or other care is rendered over a period exceeding twenty-four\nhours, may be established, conducted, or maintained in the state of North Dakota without\nobtaining annually a license therefor in the manner hereinafter provided in sections 23-16-02 and23-16-03. Chiropractic hospitals, sanatoriums, and hospitals such as those for unmarried\nmothers maintained and operated by the department of human services are not required toobtain a license under this chapter.\nIn the case of emergency or transfer beds attached to and forming a part of a licensed\nmedical doctor's office, the state department of health has the right of inspection, but no licensemay be required under the provisions of this chapter when the number of such beds does not\nexceed four.\n23-16-01.1. Moratorium on expansion of long-term care bed capacity.\n1. Notwithstanding sections 23-16-06 and 23-16-10, except when a facility reverts\nbasic care beds to nursing facility beds, nursing facility beds may not be added tothe state's licensed bed capacity during the period between August 1, 2009, andJuly 31, 2011. A nursing facility may not convert licensed nursing bed capacity tobasic care bed capacity or convert basic care beds back to nursing facility bedsmore than one time in a twelve-month period if the beds have been licensed as\nbasic care.\n2. Transfers of beds from one facility to another entity is permitted. Transferred\nnursing facility beds must become licensed within forty-eight months of transfer.Nursing facility beds transferred before August 1, 2005, which are awaiting nursingfacility licensure, may be converted to basic care licensure.\n3. A nursing facility may convert licensed nursing facility bed capacity to basic care. If\nthe converted beds remain in the same facility and are not transferred, the beds may\nrevert to nursing facility status after one year of licensure as basic care beds.\n4. Nursing facility beds that are converted to basic care may be transferred as basic\ncare beds. However, upon the transfer, the basic care beds may not be relicensedas nursing facility beds.\n5. If an Indian tribe acquires nursing facility beds, the tribal facility must meet state\nlicensing requirements for those beds within forty-eight months of acquisition. Atribal facility may seek to participate in the medical assistance programs. Medicalassistance payments may only be made to a medicaid certified tribal facility thatagrees to participate and adhere to all federal and state requirements of the medicalassistance program, including participation, screening, ratesetting, and licensing\nrequirements.\n23-16-02. Existing medical hospitals. Institutions subject to this chapter which are\nalready in operation at the time of enactment of this chapter must be given a reasonable time,\nnot to exceed one year from the date of the enactment of this chapter, within which to comply\nwith the rules, regulations, and minimum standards provided for herein.\n23-16-03. Application for license - License fee. Applicants for license shall file\napplications under oath with the state department of health upon forms prescribed. Applications\nmust be signed by the owner, or in the case of a corporation by two of its officers, or in the case\nPage No. 1 of a county or municipal unit by the head of the governmental department having jurisdiction over\nit. Applications must set forth the full name and address of the owner of the institution for whichlicense is sought, the names of the persons in control thereof, and such additional information as\nthe state department of health may require, including affirmative evidence of ability to comply\nwith such minimum standards, rules, and regulations as may be lawfully prescribed pursuant to\nthis section. An application for a license for facilities not owned by the state or its politicalsubdivisions must be accompanied by the following fees:\n1. For each licensed acute care bed, ten dollars.2. For each licensed skill care bed, ten dollars.\nLicense fees collected pursuant to this section must be deposited in the state department of\nhealth services operating fund in the state treasury and any expenditure from the fund is subjectto appropriation by the legislative assembly.\n23-16-04. Licenses. Licenses issued hereunder expire one year after date of issuance\nor upon such uniform dates annually, as the health council may prescribe by rule. Licenses mustbe issued only for the premises and persons named in the application and are not transferable or\nassignable. Licenses must be posted in a conspicuous place on the licensed premises.\n23-16-05. Inspections, consultations, and approval of plans. The state department\nof health shall make or cause to be made such inspections as may be prescribed by regulation.The health council may prescribe by regulations that any licensee or prospective applicantdesiring to make a substantial alteration or addition to its facilities or to construct new facilitiesshall, before commencing such alteration, addition, or new construction, submit plans and\nspecifications therefor to the state department of health for preliminary inspection,\nrecommendation, and approval.\n23-16-06. Authority to issue, deny, suspend, or revoke licenses. The state\ndepartment of health shall issue licenses for the operation of institutions subject to this chapterwhich are found to comply with the provisions of this chapter and such regulations as are lawfully\npromulgated by the health council. The state health officer with the approval of the health councilmay, after a hearing, suspend or revoke licenses issued hereunder on any of the following\ngrounds:\n1. Violation of any of the provisions of this chapter or the rules and regulations\npromulgated pursuant thereto.\n2. Permitting, aiding, or abetting the commission of any unlawful act.\n3. Conduct or practices detrimental to the health or safety of patients and employees of\nsaid institutions; provided that this provision may not be construed to have anyreference to practices authorized by law; and provided further that no license may besuspended or revoked for any trivial violation.\nNo application for a license may be denied, or any licenses suspended or revoked, except after a\nhearing before the health council held pursuant to written notice to the applicant or licensee,served by registered or certified mail, which notice must concisely state the grounds for such\ndenial or for such proposed suspension or revocation and must fix the time and place of hearing\nwhich may not be less than thirty days after the date of the mailing of such notice. After such\nhearing, the council shall make an order, either denying the application for license or granting thesame, or suspending or revoking such license, or dismissing the proceedings to suspend or\nrevoke as the merits of the case warrant. The council shall send a copy of its order to the\napplicant or licensee by registered or certified mail, which must contain its findings and\nconclusions, and such order, except an order of dismissal, becomes final thirty days after the\ndate of mailing unless the applicant or licensee appeals therefrom in the manner provided by\nsection 23-16-10.\nPage No. 2 23-16-07. Not applicable to certain laws. This chapter may not be construed in any\nway to restrict or modify any law pertaining to the placement and adoption of children or the care\nof unmarried mothers.\n23-16-08. Offering or advertising to dispose of infants prohibited. No hospital\nproviding maternity care may in any way offer to dispose of any child or advertise that it will give\nchildren for adoption or hold itself out, directly or indirectly, as being able to dispose of children,however, such hospitals may inform an unmarried mother of child-placing agencies licensed by\nthe department of human services.\n23-16-08.1. Access to pharmacist. Irrespective of the type of distribution system used,\nno person may refuse to allow a resident of a nursing home, as defined in subsection 3 of section\n43-34-01, to choose a pharmacist of the resident's choice for the compounding and dispensing of\ndrugs pursuant to chapter 43-15.\n23-16-09. Information confidential. Information other than reports relating to vital\nstatistics received by the state department of health through inspection or otherwise, authorizedunder this chapter are confidential and may not be disclosed publicly except in a proceedinginvolving the question of license. No agent of the state department of health or of any board of\nhealth, may disclose individually identifiable health information of such an institution obtained in\nthe course of a survey or inspection except in a judicial or administrative proceeding in response\nto an order of a court or administrative tribunal.\n23-16-10. Appeal. An appeal may be taken to the district court from any order of the\nstate health officer or health council denying an application for a license to operate a medicalhospital or related institution, or suspending or revoking a license, or from any order denying anapplication for a construction project. Any such appeal must be taken in the manner provided inchapter 28-32.\n23-16-11. Penalties.1. Any person establishing, conducting, managing, or operating any institution subject\nto this chapter, without first obtaining a license as required by this chapter, or whoviolates any of the provisions of this chapter is guilty of an infraction.\n2. In addition to any criminal sanctions that may be imposed pursuant to law, any\nperson maintaining or operating a nursing facility licensed by the department who is\nfound guilty of knowingly violating any provision of this title or any rules adoptedunder this title, or any person maintaining or operating a nursing facility found to\nhave deficiencies during a survey of the nursing facility, may be assessed a civilpenalty not to exceed one thousand dollars for each violation and for each day theviolation continues plus interest and any costs incurred by the department to enforcethis penalty. This civil penalty may be imposed by a court in a civil proceeding or bythe state health officer through an administrative hearing under chapter 28-32. If a\ncivil penalty levied by the department after an administrative hearing is not paid\nwithin thirty days after a final determination that a civil penalty is owed, unless thedetermination of a civil penalty is appealed to a district court, the civil penalty andany costs incurred by the department to enforce the penalty may be withheld frompayments due to the person or nursing facility from the department of humanservices. Any funds received as penalties must be applied to protect residents ofthe nursing facility, to relocate residents, to maintain operation of the nursing facility,and to reimburse residents for loss of personal funds.\n23-16-12. Injunction. The state department of health, in accordance with the laws of the\nstate governing injunctions and other process, may maintain an action in the name of the stateagainst any person, partnership, association, corporation, or limited liability company for\nestablishing, conducting, managing, or operating any hospital within the meaning of the chapterwithout first having a license therefor as herein provided or without first obtaining from the state\nPage No. 3 department of health written approval of plans and specifications for major alterations of,\nadditions to, or construction of health facilities.\n23-16-13. Appropriation. Repealed by omission from this code.\n23-16-14. Participation in abortion - Not mandatory. No hospital, physician, nurse,\nhospital employee, nor any other person is under any duty, by law or contract, nor may such\nhospital or person in any circumstances be required to participate in the performance of anabortion, if such hospital or person objects to such abortion. No such person or institution maybe discriminated against because the person or institution so objects.\n23-16-15. Umbilical cord blood donation.\n1. Unless it is medically inadvisable, a hospital shall allow a pregnant patient to arrange\nfor the blood extracted from the umbilical cord of the patient's newborn child to be\ndonated to a public cord blood bank. A patient who agrees to donate cord blood to apublic cord blood bank may not be charged for the costs of collecting, storing, ortransporting the cord blood.\n2. A hospital is not required to collect cord blood if in the professional judgment of a\nlicensed physician the collection of the cord blood would threaten the health of themother or newborn child. This section does not require a hospital or hospital\nemployee, including a physician, nurse, or other medical staff, to collect cord blood ifthe collection of cord blood conflicts with the bona fide religious practices and beliefsof the hospital or hospital employee. This section does not require a hospital toarrange for the donation of blood extracted from umbilical cords.\nPage No. 4"
} |
[
-0.011165511794388294,
-0.01875576563179493,
0.02221067063510418,
0.015773020684719086,
-0.11541600525379181,
0.026676800101995468,
-0.031395863741636276,
-0.07962985336780548,
-0.07903417199850082,
0.01482059620320797,
0.02363554760813713,
-0.09502484649419785,
0.10587164014577866,
-0.043927714228630066,
0.001278263982385397,
0.0846717432141304,
0.09664315730333328,
-0.05104101076722145,
-0.03387380391359329,
-0.04392867162823677,
0.023659484460949898,
0.06164798140525818,
-0.0076293558813631535,
0.03677857667207718,
0.01393258199095726,
0.03835781291127205,
-0.04767512530088425,
-0.01503994781523943,
-0.09893238544464111,
-0.11665718257427216,
0.024729043245315552,
-0.028094671666622162,
0.03514496609568596,
0.06780829280614853,
0.04670337215065956,
-0.03657781705260277,
0.0666249468922615,
0.011248450726270676,
-0.0017895576311275363,
0.039906423538923264,
-0.024623870849609375,
-0.011690221726894379,
-0.006689682137221098,
0.04855381324887276,
-0.09230425208806992,
0.022438403218984604,
-0.041265495121479034,
-0.03169265389442444,
0.056181956082582474,
0.003296107519418001,
-0.04937243089079857,
-0.09398595243692398,
-0.014688150025904179,
0.016858072951436043,
-0.059872157871723175,
0.0378502793610096,
0.03595210984349251,
0.0204852893948555,
-0.008061069063842297,
-0.04309605807065964,
0.0073417858220636845,
-0.0039022834971547127,
-0.06372956186532974,
-0.010242786258459091,
-0.07875444740056992,
0.031129270792007446,
-0.014767072163522243,
-0.083208367228508,
0.03982149064540863,
-0.055979952216148376,
0.05442502722144127,
-0.048371367156505585,
0.00013450218830257654,
-0.012417029589414597,
0.07928144931793213,
0.04832197725772858,
0.06765122711658478,
0.02063928171992302,
0.10473284870386124,
-0.03833816200494766,
-0.1356072723865509,
-0.05509987473487854,
-0.063651904463768,
0.04291331768035889,
-0.0353873074054718,
-0.006766848731786013,
-0.09742356091737747,
0.013115514069795609,
0.014582070522010326,
-0.0592363178730011,
0.00853125099092722,
-0.07137848436832428,
-0.07547362893819809,
-0.015874536707997322,
0.07300353795289993,
-0.008426102809607983,
-0.058814886957407,
-0.023622626438736916,
-0.013111167587339878,
0.04341431334614754,
-0.045992493629455566,
-0.04204276204109192,
-0.00544776301831007,
-0.04897371679544449,
0.01836610957980156,
0.03152867406606674,
0.03416522219777107,
0.03231700882315636,
-0.07889261096715927,
-0.06840161234140396,
0.07948315143585205,
-0.04203388839960098,
0.03905415162444115,
0.030814895406365395,
-0.011353226378560066,
0.06822150200605392,
-0.03288246691226959,
-0.09415722638368607,
-0.008342370390892029,
0.03633098676800728,
-0.071408711373806,
-0.015771476551890373,
0.04205573350191116,
0.01658710092306137,
-0.031545478850603104,
0.06318511068820953,
-0.03440010920166969,
2.6683054670621835e-32,
0.02511107735335827,
-0.013371957466006279,
-0.011565197259187698,
-0.04228189215064049,
0.03298690915107727,
0.03648700192570686,
0.025196023285388947,
0.05042851343750954,
0.008887812495231628,
-0.05591331422328949,
0.022792639210820198,
-0.022780800238251686,
0.03209780156612396,
-0.05646059662103653,
0.0018195515731349587,
0.01985722966492176,
-0.005038878880441189,
0.013352847658097744,
-0.11376979947090149,
0.07445844262838364,
0.01778264343738556,
-0.08444095402956009,
-0.09660619497299194,
-0.02639508992433548,
-0.05111822113394737,
0.05528624728322029,
-0.03548335283994675,
0.012754099443554878,
0.028294406831264496,
0.04499714821577072,
0.0522373802959919,
-0.03654361143708229,
-0.02065524272620678,
-0.06412581354379654,
-0.021250244230031967,
-0.012519832700490952,
0.009714567102491856,
0.02221299149096012,
-0.02947930432856083,
-0.05050727725028992,
0.011895185336470604,
0.0056195552460849285,
0.02465853840112686,
0.061488937586545944,
0.005687176715582609,
-0.018234210088849068,
-0.0005865205894224346,
0.006010223645716906,
0.014123343862593174,
-0.07382401078939438,
0.06512254476547241,
0.012827306985855103,
-0.016354773193597794,
-0.08409388363361359,
-0.0475790873169899,
0.07150048017501831,
-0.05963879078626633,
0.034993190318346024,
0.0390324741601944,
-0.04717870429158211,
0.023481400683522224,
0.0819263830780983,
0.025286750867962837,
-0.002149226376786828,
0.02311619184911251,
-0.026484427973628044,
0.030930303037166595,
-0.021351108327507973,
0.06835552304983139,
-0.007178854197263718,
0.05757123604416847,
-0.09476283937692642,
0.02895362488925457,
0.051695868372917175,
0.007375170476734638,
0.01075829192996025,
0.03263789787888527,
-0.06427168846130371,
0.04137877747416496,
-0.028807930648326874,
-0.018008621409535408,
-0.0578310452401638,
0.015128656290471554,
-0.018022410571575165,
0.038689032196998596,
-0.08350664377212524,
0.01969451829791069,
-0.13580168783664703,
-0.02199292741715908,
0.07166533917188644,
0.00013306063192430884,
0.047661151736974716,
-0.0494626984000206,
-0.024539902806282043,
-0.003085534321144223,
-2.392849671782089e-32,
0.0585407018661499,
0.06357387453317642,
-0.037248365581035614,
-0.00426921620965004,
0.03325975313782692,
-0.007755578029900789,
0.004708386957645416,
-0.05843380093574524,
0.10971814393997192,
-0.018738973885774612,
0.03772317245602608,
0.008483735844492912,
-0.01408274658024311,
-0.08187912404537201,
0.005497789476066828,
-0.03966783732175827,
-0.00703936442732811,
0.03662735968828201,
0.07409175485372543,
-0.029421161860227585,
-0.022934164851903915,
0.04698563739657402,
-0.010108129121363163,
-0.02890009805560112,
0.027733134105801582,
-0.04635335132479668,
-0.156680628657341,
0.09117493033409119,
0.01956043392419815,
0.10266315937042236,
0.046820152550935745,
-0.038857460021972656,
0.05561539903283119,
0.02244540862739086,
-0.1290331780910492,
-0.06877012550830841,
0.019606994464993477,
0.04379797726869583,
0.030053988099098206,
-0.02502300962805748,
0.10413212329149246,
-0.036830924451351166,
-0.026980698108673096,
0.046860046684741974,
0.0007073893211781979,
0.02449631504714489,
-0.05377974733710289,
0.001609874190762639,
-0.005729116965085268,
-0.02143326960504055,
-0.004982405342161655,
0.040468741208314896,
-0.04173146188259125,
0.042660608887672424,
0.004715516231954098,
0.1073547974228859,
0.07916373759508133,
0.027090342715382576,
-0.022716138511896133,
-0.0031826584599912167,
-0.023984132334589958,
0.017028477042913437,
0.0037783875595778227,
-0.02294538915157318,
0.04995231330394745,
-0.04048125445842743,
-0.13256649672985077,
-0.03442278131842613,
-0.10640402883291245,
0.05664386972784996,
-0.0801444873213768,
0.037859346717596054,
0.007921682670712471,
-0.022297341376543045,
-0.06266069412231445,
0.13210077583789825,
-0.0051885731518268585,
0.054173070937395096,
-0.018296586349606514,
-0.008868750184774399,
-0.021029096096754074,
-0.017748229205608368,
-0.01566687412559986,
0.06441447883844376,
-0.012605898082256317,
0.049555059522390366,
0.03497590497136116,
-0.06612899154424667,
0.04201793670654297,
0.0491308867931366,
-0.08229543268680573,
-0.018668388947844505,
0.028662580996751785,
-0.01517084613442421,
0.00594300078228116,
-7.282328340352251e-8,
0.061129022389650345,
0.0850398913025856,
0.008215541951358318,
0.08951069414615631,
0.1345134824514389,
0.07003290206193924,
-0.018332140520215034,
0.07229075580835342,
0.01603984832763672,
0.0002463202108629048,
-0.036404769867658615,
-0.009519975632429123,
-0.00013619438686873764,
-0.041291043162345886,
0.027609888464212418,
0.03042469546198845,
0.02671358361840248,
-0.1362985074520111,
0.001401943271048367,
0.02207644283771515,
0.005666407290846109,
-0.03358445316553116,
-0.006555780302733183,
0.03618425503373146,
-0.0861140713095665,
-0.06867953389883041,
0.03319086879491806,
0.041072577238082886,
-0.027917196974158287,
0.04564417526125908,
0.01359869260340929,
-0.005550522357225418,
0.003918380942195654,
-0.005144839640706778,
0.10081135481595993,
-0.02435213327407837,
-0.1215343251824379,
0.0028350017964839935,
-0.012896498665213585,
0.06925468146800995,
-0.02272108383476734,
-0.0477486178278923,
0.0474286712706089,
-0.05627473443746567,
-0.012354000471532345,
-0.01594858057796955,
0.038049425929784775,
-0.0951399952173233,
0.052570026367902756,
0.049315985292196274,
-0.012923415750265121,
-0.08189784735441208,
-0.01431536115705967,
-0.030802762135863304,
0.04455007612705231,
0.0505228154361248,
0.038855936378240585,
-0.09540895372629166,
0.03895697742700577,
0.04638326168060303,
0.11813249439001083,
0.058141592890024185,
-0.012159938924014568,
-0.03036518581211567
] | {
"pdf_file": "UZ24VCW32BGC524CZI3QWY7LKJJXZ2ZZ.pdf",
"text": "Schools in Alabama's \nNational Archery in the Schools Program\nCOUNTY SCHOOL Equipment Purchased Box to School\nAlabama A & M University\nMill Springs Academy\nAthens City of Athens - Rec.\nAutauga Billingsley School\nAutauga Marbury High School\nAutauga Pine Level Elementary\nAutauga Prattville Intermediate School\nAutauga/Elmore WFF\nBaldwin Bay Minette Middle School\nBaldwin Central Baldwin Middle School\nBaldwin Daphne Elementary School South\nBaldwin Daphne Middle School\nBaldwin Fairhope High School\nBaldwin Fairhope Middle School\nBaldwin Foley High School\nBaldwin Foley Intermediate\nBaldwin Foley Middle School\nBaldwin Gulf Shores Middle School\nBaldwin J. L. Newton School\nBaldwin Magnolia School\nBaldwin Marietta Johnson School of Organic Educ\nBaldwin N. Baldwin Center for Technology\nBaldwin Perdido School\nBaldwin Rockwell Elementary School\nBaldwin Rosinton School\nBaldwin South Baldwin Center of Technology\nBaldwin Spanish Fort Elementary\nBaldwin Spanish Fort High School\nBaldwin Stapleton School\nBarbour Barbour County Middle School\nBibb Bibb County Career Academy\nBibb Brent Elementary School\nBibb Cahawba Christian School\nBlount JB Pennington School\nBlount Susan Moore Elementary\nBullock Conecuh Springs Christian School\nButler Ft. Dale School\nMonday, March 29, 2010 Page 1 of 11 COUNTY SCHOOL Equipment Purchased Box to School\nButler Georgiana High School\nButler McKenzie High School\nCalhoun C. E. Hanna\nCalhoun Coldwater Elementary\nChambers B. H. Shawmut Elementary\nChambers Eastside Elementary\nChambers Fairfax Elementary\nChambers Five Points Elementary\nChambers Huguley Elementary School\nCherokee Cedar Bluff High School\nCherokee Centre Middle School\nCherokee Cherokee Elementary School\nCherokee Meno Elementary\nCherokee Sand Rock High School\nCherokee Spring Garden School\nChilton Chilton County High School\nChilton Clanton Elementary School\nChilton Clanton Middle School\nChilton Isabella High School\nChilton Jemison Middle School\nChilton Thorsby Elementary\nChilton Thorsby High School\nChoctaw Southern Choctaw High School\nClarke Alabama Cooperative Extension System\nClarke Clarke County Extension Office\nClarke Coffeeville High School\nClarke Jackson High School\nClarke Jackson Middle School\nCleburne Cleburne County High School\nCleburne Heflin Parks and Recreation\nCoffee Carroll\nCoffee Pathway\nColbert Hatton Elementary\nColbert Muscle Shoals Middle School\nColbert R. E. Thompson Intermediate\nColumbus GA Carver High School\nConecuh WFF Employee\nCoosa Central Coosa Middle School\nCovington Andalusia Middle School\nCovington Fleeta School\nMonday, March 29, 2010 Page 2 of 11 COUNTY SCHOOL Equipment Purchased Box to School\nCovington Florala Middle School\nCovington Opp Middle School\nCovington Pleasant Home School\nCovington Red Level High School\nCovington Straughn Middle School\nCrenshaw Brantley High School\nCrenshaw Highland Home School\nCrenshaw Luverne High School\nCullman CARE Alternative\nCullman Child Development Center\nCullman Cold Springs High\nCullman Cullman City Parks & Recreation\nCullman Cullman High School\nCullman Cullman Middle School\nCullman East Elementary School\nCullman Fairview Elementary School\nCullman Fairview High\nCullman Fairview Middle\nCullman Garden City Elementary\nCullman Good Hope Elementary School\nCullman Good Hope High School\nCullman Good Hope Middle School\nCullman Hanceville Elementary\nCullman Hanceville High School\nCullman Hanceville Middle School\nCullman Harmony Middle School\nCullman Heritage Archery Club\nCullman Holly Pond School\nCullman Parkside Elementary School\nCullman Van's Sporting Goods\nCullman Vinemont Elementary\nCullman Welti Elementary\nCullman West Elementary\nCullman West Point High School\nCullman West Point Intermediate\nCullman West Point Middle\nDale Ariton High School\nDale D. A. Smith Middle School\nDale DA Smith Middle School\nDale Dale County (LES)\nMonday, March 29, 2010 Page 3 of 11 COUNTY SCHOOL Equipment Purchased Box to School\nDale Dale County High School\nDale GW Long Elementary\nDale Midland City Elementary\nDale Newton Elementary\nDale South Dale Middle School\nDallas Meadowview Elementary School\nDekalb Camp Skyline Ranch\nDekalb Collinsville High School\nDekalb Crossville High School\nDekalb Ft. Payne Middle School\nDekalb Geraldine High School\nDekalb Ider School\nDekalb Moon Lake Elementary School\nDekalb Sylvania High School\nElmore Eclectic Middle School\nElmore Elmore County High School\nElmore Holtville Middle School\nElmore Millbrook Middle School\nElmore Redland Elementary School\nElmore Southside Middle School\nElmore Southside Middle School\nElmore Tallassee High School\nElmore Wetumpka High School\nElmore Wetumpka Middle School\nEscambia A. C. Moore Elementary\nEscambia Brewton Middle School\nEscambia Escambia Co unty High School\nEscambia Huxford Elementary\nEtowah Sardis High School\nFayette Berry Elementary\nFayette Fayette Elementary School\nFayette Fayette Middle School\nFayette Hubbertville School\nGeneva Geneva High School\nGeneva Samson High School\nGeneva Slocomb Elementary\nGeneva Slocomb High School\nHale Greensboro West Elementary\nHale Moundville Elementary\nHale Sunshine Elementary\nMonday, March 29, 2010 Page 4 of 11 COUNTY SCHOOL Equipment Purchased Box to School\nHouston Ashford High School\nHouston Beverlye Magnet\nHouston Carver-Dothan City Schools\nHouston Cottonwood High School\nHouston Dothan Leisure Services\nHouston Heard Magnet\nHouston Hidden Lake Elementary\nHouston Highlands Elementary School\nHouston Houston County High School\nHouston Kelly Springs Elementary\nHouston Rehobeth High School\nHouston Rehobeth Middle School\nHouston Webb Elementary\nHouston Wicksburg High School\nJackson Bridgeport Middle School\nJackson Macedonia Elementary School\nJackson Paint Rock Valley High School\nJackson Pisgah School\nJackson Rosalie Elementary School\nJackson Scottsboro Junior High School\nJefferson Avondale Elementary\nJefferson Banks Middle School\nJefferson Berry Middle School\nJefferson Brookville Elementary\nJefferson Central Park Elementary School\nJefferson Clay Chalkville Middle\nJefferson Clay Elementary\nJefferson EPIC Elementary School\nJefferson Gardendale First Baptist Church\nJefferson Glenn Middle School\nJefferson Green Acres Middle School\nJefferson Gresham Elementary School\nJefferson Hard Elementary School\nJefferson Hewitt Trussville High School\nJefferson Hewitt Trussville Middle School\nJefferson Hudson K-8 School\nJefferson Jefferson County Schools - Adapted PE\nJefferson Leeds Middle School\nJefferson Liberty Park Middle School\nJefferson Mortimer Jordan High School\nMonday, March 29, 2010 Page 5 of 11 COUNTY SCHOOL Equipment Purchased Box to School\nJefferson Mountain Brook Junior High\nJefferson Moved to NC school\nJefferson North Jefferson Middle School\nJefferson Pinson Elementary\nJefferson Pizitz Middle School\nJefferson Robinson Elementary\nJefferson Simmons Middle School\nJefferson Sun Valley Elementary\nJefferson UAB School of Education\nJefferson Vestavia Hills High School\nLamar Sulligent Elementary\nLamar Sulligent High School\nLauderdale Univ. of N. Alabama\nLawrence East Lawrence Middle School\nLawrence Hatton Elementary\nLawrence Lawrence County High School\nLee Auburn University\nLee Loachapoka Elementary School\nLee Ogletree Elementary School\nLee Opelika Middle School\nLee Opelika Middle School\nLee Phenix City Elementary School\nLee Ridgecrest High School\nLee Trinity Christian School\nLee Yarbrough Elementary\nLimestone Ardmore high School\nLimestone Athens Intermediate School\nLimestone Athens Middle School\nLimestone Cedar Hill Elementary\nLimestone Clements High School\nLimestone Creekside Elementary\nLimestone East Limestone High School\nLimestone Elkmont High School\nLimestone Johnson Elementary\nLimestone North Alabama Shooting Sports Ass. Dire\nLimestone Owens Elementary\nLimestone Piney Chapel Elementary\nLimestone Reid Elementary\nLimestone Tanner High School\nLimestone Twelve Ring Archery\nMonday, March 29, 2010 Page 6 of 11 COUNTY SCHOOL Equipment Purchased Box to School\nLimestone West Limestone High School\nMacon B. T. Washington High School\nMacon George Washington Carver\nMacon Lewis Adams Early Childhood Center\nMacon Tuskegee Inst. Middle School\nMacon Tuskegee Public Elementary School\nMacon Washington Public Schools\nMadison Buckhorn High School\nMadison Challenger Middle School\nMadison East Clinton\nMadison Hampton Cove Middle School\nMadison Lee High School\nMadison Life Christian Academy\nMadison Madison County High School\nMadison Madison County Tech Center\nMadison Meridianville Middle School\nMadison Mountain Gap Middle School\nMadison New Hope High School\nMadison New Market School\nMadison Owens Crossroads Elementary School\nMadison Riverton Elementary\nMadison Riverton Elementary School\nMadison Riverton Middle School\nMadison Sparkman High School\nMadison Whitesburg Middle\nMarengo Demopolis High School\nMarengo Demopolis Middle School\nMarengo Sweetwater Community Learning Center\nMarion Hackleburg High School\nMarshall Arab Elementary\nMarshall Brindlee Mountain Middle School\nMarshall Camp Chula Vista\nMarshall Claysville Junior High School\nMarshall Marshall Technical School\nMobile Adams Middle School\nMobile Alba Middle School\nMobile Alma Bryant High School\nMobile B. T. Washington\nMobile B.C. Raines High School\nMobile Baker High School\nMonday, March 29, 2010 Page 7 of 11 COUNTY SCHOOL Equipment Purchased Box to School\nMobile Breitling Elementary\nMobile Burns Middle School\nMobile Castlen Elementary School\nMobile Colmer Middle School - Mississippi\nMobile Council Traditional School\nMobile Dixon Elementary\nMobile E. R. Dickson Elementary School\nMobile Forest Hill Elementary\nMobile Gillard Elementary School\nMobile Grand Bay Middle School\nMobile Grand Bay Middle School\nMobile Hamilton Elementary\nMobile Hillsdale Middle School\nMobile Hutchens Elementary School\nMobile Lighthouse Academy\nMobile Mary G. Montgomery High School\nMobile McDavid Jones Elementary School\nMobile O'Rourke Elementary School\nMobile Our Lady Of Guadalupe School\nMobile Palmer Pillans Middle School\nMobile Phillips Prep School\nMobile Pillans Middle School\nMobile Saraland Elementary\nMobile Saraland High School\nMobile Semmes Middle School\nMobile St. Elmo Elementary\nMobile St. Ignatius School\nMobile St. Lukes Episcopal School\nMobile Theodore High School\nMobile UMS-Wright\nMobile Vigor High School\nMobile Volunteer\nMobile Woodcock Elementary\nMontgomery Alabama State University\nMontgomery Alabama Wildlife Federation\nMontgomery Auburn University at Montgomery\nMontgomery AUM\nMontgomery Brewbaker Junior High School\nMontgomery BTW Magnet School\nMontgomery Danelly Elementary\nMonday, March 29, 2010 Page 8 of 11 COUNTY SCHOOL Equipment Purchased Box to School\nMontgomery Floyd Elementary School\nMontgomery Floyd Middle Magnet School\nMontgomery Georgia Washington Junior High School\nMontgomery Goodwyn Junior High School\nMontgomery Huntington College\nMontgomery LAMP High School\nMontgomery Montgomery Catholic High School\nMontgomery SMCA\nMontgomery South Montgomery Academy\nMontgomery South Montgomery County Acedemy\nMontgomery Southside Middle School\nMorgan Austinville Elementary\nMorgan Banks-Caddell Elementary School\nMorgan Ben Davis Elementary\nMorgan Brookhaven Middle School\nMorgan Decatur City Schools\nMorgan F. Nungester Elementary\nPerry Judson College\nPickens Gordo High School\nPike Banks Middle School\nPike Charles Henderson High School\nPike Charles Henderson Middle School\nPike Goshen Elementary\nPike Goshen High School\nPike Pike County Elementary\nPike Pike County High School\nPike Troy Elementary School\nPolk Cherokee Elementary School\nRandolph Handley High School\nRandolph Rock Mills Junior High\nRussell Ridgecrest Elementary School\nRussell Russell County Middle School\nRussell South Girard School\nShelby Chelsea High School\nShelby Chelsea Intermediate School\nShelby Helena Intermediate School\nShelby Liberty Baptist Church\nShelby Montevallo elementary School\nShelby Montevallo High School\nShelby Montevallo Middle School\nMonday, March 29, 2010 Page 9 of 11 COUNTY SCHOOL Equipment Purchased Box to School\nShelby Pelham YMCA\nShelby Shelby County High School\nShelby Thompson Middle School\nShelby Vincent Elementary School\nShelby Vincent Middle/High School\nShelby Wilsonville Elementary School\nSt. Clair Ashville High School\nSt. Clair Ashville Middle School\nSt. Clair Ashville Middle School\nSt. Clair Moody Middle School\nSt. Clair Odenville Middle School\nSt. Clair Pell City High School\nSt. Clair Springville Elementary\nSt. Clair Springville Middle School\nSt. Clair St. Clair County High School\nSumter York West End Junior High School\nTalladega BB Comer Elementary\nTalladega Childersburg Middle School\nTalladega Drew Middle School\nTalladega Fayetteville Elementary School\nTalladega Fayetteville High School\nTalladega Graham Elementary School\nTalladega Hope Academy School\nTalladega Lincoln Elementary\nTalladega Munford Elementary\nTalladega Munford High School\nTalladega R. L. Young Elementary\nTalladega Salter Elementary School\nTalladega Stemley Road Elementary\nTallapoosa Alex City Middle School\nTallapoosa Reeltown School\nTuscaloosa Brookwood High School\nTuscaloosa Brookwood High School\nTuscaloosa Cottondale Elementary\nTuscaloosa Eastwood Middle School\nTuscaloosa Hillcrest Middle School\nTuscaloosa Holt Elementary School\nTuscaloosa Myrtlewood Elementary\nTuscaloosa Northside Middle School\nWalker Carbon Hill Junior High School\nMonday, March 29, 2010 Page 10 of 11 COUNTY SCHOOL Equipment Purchased Box to School\nWalker Curry High School\nWalker Curry Middle School\nWalker Farmstead Elementary\nWalker Maddox Middle School\nWalker Parrish High School\nWalker Townley Jr. High\nWashington Washington County High\nWinston Addison Elementary\nWinston Addison High School\nWinston Double Springs Elementary School\nWinston Lynn Elementary School\nWinston Lynn High School\nWinston Meek Elementary\nWinston Meek High School\nWinston Speake School\nWinston Winston County High School\nMonday, March 29, 2010 Page 11 of 11"
} |
[
0.035096846520900726,
0.00676423916593194,
0.018765561282634735,
-0.06376591324806213,
-0.09164131432771683,
-0.05948341265320778,
-0.010963194072246552,
0.11077508330345154,
-0.04802395775914192,
0.06632713228464127,
-0.050757281482219696,
-0.09136031568050385,
-0.06459331512451172,
0.07118157297372818,
-0.0999303087592125,
-0.010682373307645321,
0.006876432336866856,
0.0334903746843338,
-0.13071513175964355,
0.0313134491443634,
0.05343987047672272,
-0.10803932696580887,
0.04882269725203514,
-0.026990624144673347,
0.06986864656209946,
0.016789456829428673,
0.04873483255505562,
-0.002941621234640479,
-0.061399441212415695,
-0.03208451718091965,
-0.05264876410365105,
0.00774499773979187,
0.03845665976405144,
-0.003236318239942193,
-0.0006060641026124358,
-0.042228106409311295,
-0.034607112407684326,
0.047821249812841415,
-0.022779470309615135,
0.05844922363758087,
0.04122474044561386,
-0.05307057872414589,
0.0012048388598486781,
0.0035372094716876745,
0.050519175827503204,
-0.04071303457021713,
0.011069301515817642,
-0.03634177893400192,
-0.011930756270885468,
-0.007093603722751141,
-0.09813743084669113,
-0.06450392305850983,
-0.14377450942993164,
-0.01174450945109129,
-0.02730136550962925,
0.00002636487624840811,
-0.018182719126343727,
-0.06225239858031273,
0.05076006427407265,
-0.052735865116119385,
-0.02331761084496975,
-0.00862565916031599,
-0.00637593911960721,
0.040610238909721375,
0.009888112545013428,
0.0013113600434735417,
0.04758854955434799,
0.006874823477119207,
-0.03922424837946892,
0.030246559530496597,
0.059193018823862076,
0.05453989654779434,
-0.009363795630633831,
-0.01873062551021576,
-0.01032313797622919,
-0.021002164110541344,
-0.018160291016101837,
-0.005696179810911417,
-0.013946865685284138,
-0.0458613745868206,
0.06445731967687607,
0.05249107629060745,
0.010130693204700947,
0.09607137739658356,
-0.018166404217481613,
0.10175503045320511,
0.025662478059530258,
0.07822653651237488,
-0.10317707806825638,
-0.0016421520849689841,
-0.006057379767298698,
0.03382591903209686,
-0.04156295582652092,
0.0224384143948555,
0.0724760964512825,
0.00006229674181668088,
0.06714291125535965,
-0.02465503290295601,
0.07820155471563339,
-0.017425421625375748,
0.02845601737499237,
-0.03568854182958603,
0.06654171645641327,
-0.024697188287973404,
-0.07747480273246765,
-0.08238977938890457,
0.02624969556927681,
0.01807071454823017,
0.06884466856718063,
0.0034979316405951977,
0.03683973848819733,
-0.012434449046850204,
-0.08518948405981064,
0.06899843364953995,
0.09965691715478897,
-0.026026485487818718,
0.012565887533128262,
0.008637500926852226,
0.027680817991495132,
0.03518618643283844,
0.058935798704624176,
-0.02996848337352276,
0.01769089326262474,
-0.02283310331404209,
0.08162231743335724,
0.05762214586138725,
0.048302531242370605,
-4.050241090865041e-33,
0.009334104135632515,
-0.013397622853517532,
0.03553593531250954,
0.09104608744382858,
-0.03444819897413254,
-0.019387884065508842,
0.014146698638796806,
0.022730903699994087,
0.021317889913916588,
0.12535957992076874,
0.016308365389704704,
0.02736089751124382,
0.03897496312856674,
0.13305199146270752,
-0.018123511224985123,
-0.010506103746592999,
0.0005477520171552896,
-0.06241883337497711,
-0.07852298021316528,
0.06350124627351761,
-0.0025095914024859667,
-0.016430072486400604,
-0.003127780742943287,
0.0028657112270593643,
0.0014300865586847067,
-0.0028241719119250774,
-0.06057281047105789,
0.011061100289225578,
-0.04142754524946213,
-0.015041769482195377,
-0.01861279271543026,
-0.01989888958632946,
-0.09599733352661133,
-0.07687437534332275,
-0.027238937094807625,
-0.0037438110448420048,
0.06571295112371445,
-0.015519256703555584,
0.06934485584497452,
-0.06191566213965416,
-0.0007458963082171977,
0.04883340373635292,
0.0461808405816555,
-0.038690730929374695,
0.09177307784557343,
0.06046612933278084,
-0.04323318973183632,
-0.006348340772092342,
-0.004276528023183346,
-0.0050245788879692554,
-0.028690259903669357,
-0.009580745361745358,
0.021045271307229996,
-0.08126477152109146,
0.027801863849163055,
0.0800613984465599,
-0.0619751438498497,
0.04785918816924095,
-0.016527023166418076,
0.10146217048168182,
0.019602933898568153,
0.06321321427822113,
-0.023995866999030113,
0.06709297746419907,
-0.05498215928673744,
0.044750332832336426,
-0.17543597519397736,
-0.07066305726766586,
0.04535660147666931,
-0.011005493812263012,
-0.04734410345554352,
-0.048319172114133835,
0.0034280375111848116,
-0.03295578807592392,
0.008992152288556099,
0.05870288610458374,
-0.013707378879189491,
0.05286942794919014,
-0.055795278400182724,
-0.0803200826048851,
0.008499668911099434,
-0.024319268763065338,
-0.017986273393034935,
-0.10260915756225586,
-0.06434928625822067,
-0.04186686873435974,
0.057273633778095245,
-0.05277421325445175,
-0.04135119169950485,
-0.030240481719374657,
-0.02583000808954239,
-0.031073423102498055,
-0.04907412454485893,
-0.06562085449695587,
-0.03501618281006813,
-6.557976454061999e-34,
0.0022100519854575396,
0.08121275901794434,
-0.048327598720788956,
-0.009650765918195248,
0.078077033162117,
0.0795300081372261,
-0.03434765338897705,
-0.04801759123802185,
0.047990862280130386,
0.014181610196828842,
0.03865595906972885,
0.1057276576757431,
-0.05815303325653076,
-0.006872994359582663,
-0.038457635790109634,
-0.007663654629141092,
-0.09191861003637314,
-0.008659692481160164,
-0.06060329079627991,
-0.011427643708884716,
-0.12855954468250275,
0.07079152762889862,
0.028288163244724274,
-0.005356368143111467,
-0.025861704722046852,
0.06775939464569092,
-0.041250649839639664,
-0.08142039179801941,
0.00805952213704586,
-0.029754044488072395,
-0.08409935235977173,
-0.07735325396060944,
0.0186801478266716,
0.0063451738096773624,
-0.04660922661423683,
-0.039991412311792374,
0.08569891005754471,
-0.04973909258842468,
0.101530522108078,
-0.02380705066025257,
0.04306597635149956,
-0.01399172842502594,
0.02513616532087326,
-0.09400292485952377,
0.002664951141923666,
0.0820683017373085,
0.015601009130477905,
0.015573210082948208,
-0.02479766495525837,
0.07644139975309372,
-0.060418885201215744,
0.015203576534986496,
-0.022527584806084633,
-0.032842881977558136,
-0.00011414703476475552,
-0.01188119500875473,
0.0676431953907013,
-0.06451070308685303,
0.050512418150901794,
-0.027257932350039482,
-0.04785653576254845,
-0.08947444707155228,
0.04625251516699791,
0.052056584507226944,
-0.04845642298460007,
-0.015676645562052727,
-0.003515392541885376,
-0.006582214031368494,
0.030016595497727394,
0.04053254798054695,
-0.060963552445173264,
0.048650067299604416,
0.017970193177461624,
-0.0710226520895958,
0.07040034979581833,
-0.022741064429283142,
-0.06817588955163956,
-0.0006982804625295103,
0.03326646238565445,
-0.018186286091804504,
0.05292869359254837,
-0.06493464857339859,
-0.030787363648414612,
0.014718939550220966,
0.011120648123323917,
0.0521106943488121,
-0.003925406374037266,
-0.012582900933921337,
-0.003250845242291689,
-0.02901661954820156,
-0.041825469583272934,
-0.07431423664093018,
-0.029433729127049446,
-0.06971938163042068,
0.044572267681360245,
-4.97175314251308e-8,
0.05868195369839668,
-0.0488215833902359,
0.04614795744419098,
-0.019124580547213554,
0.007437975145876408,
0.0053398991003632545,
-0.0896134227514267,
0.03964946046471596,
0.03573920577764511,
0.03204277157783508,
0.0054337214678525925,
-0.011899960227310658,
-0.02826603129506111,
0.005875260103493929,
0.09937048703432083,
0.015402073971927166,
0.004237516783177853,
-0.007974698208272457,
-0.04856083169579506,
-0.0998649001121521,
-0.019759012386202812,
-0.03128943592309952,
-0.011830906383693218,
0.11629844456911087,
0.012170412577688694,
0.007269237656146288,
-0.061506178230047226,
-0.029311219230294228,
-0.050100065767765045,
0.02805108204483986,
0.07738614082336426,
0.04453478381037712,
0.016091691330075264,
0.005731463432312012,
0.02656039409339428,
-0.04190048947930336,
0.010477224364876747,
0.03762122616171837,
0.017093311995267868,
0.08107257634401321,
-0.07402895390987396,
-0.09185995161533356,
-0.022170212119817734,
-0.012030687183141708,
0.05870302766561508,
-0.050054095685482025,
0.05707273259758949,
-0.0567406602203846,
-0.021737849339842796,
-0.02295619063079357,
-0.0521959625184536,
0.02960045076906681,
-0.027890877798199654,
-0.023399248719215393,
-0.03415681794285774,
0.07106155157089233,
-0.023606108501553535,
0.02740490809082985,
-0.025277670472860336,
0.04194316267967224,
0.06425971537828445,
0.12775930762290955,
-0.08430815488100052,
-0.03047790750861168
] | {
"pdf_file": "YE54VY55FNS7H3IOPRHQYVOD2RJJW3DT.pdf",
"text": " \n \nStudent Handout \nName:____________ _____________________ \nHuman blood observation \nDirections: Obtain a slide of prepared human blood. Start on low power (10x or 20x) and \nwork your way to high power (40x), focusing under each objective. Under high power, draw a \nportion of what you see. Use a pencil and pay attention to detail. \n \nDrawing: \n \n \n \n \n Questions: \n1. How many types of cells do you see? What is the difference between them? Why do \nyou think there are different types of cells? \n \n \n \n2. What is the composition of the cells that you see? In other words, estimate the \npercent of each type. \n \n \n \n \n \n \n3. What is the role of blood? How do you think form (the structure of the blood cells) \nfits function (role of blood)? \n \n \n \n \n4. If you have done this in previous labs, estimate the diameter of one of the cells. \nShow your work. "
} |
[
-0.04051857069134712,
0.03387622907757759,
0.02521902695298195,
0.05080433562397957,
0.034555383026599884,
-0.037743229418992996,
-0.008264295756816864,
-0.042762573808431625,
-0.061035942286252975,
0.05986294150352478,
0.008668290451169014,
-0.053004153072834015,
0.04559691250324249,
-0.023207809776067734,
-0.0034401058219373226,
0.06766237318515778,
0.0652076005935669,
-0.016756700351834297,
-0.005780159030109644,
0.054347600787878036,
0.06253337860107422,
0.019903486594557762,
-0.05304756760597229,
0.012506481260061264,
0.004085168242454529,
-0.05493437871336937,
-0.047144655138254166,
-0.012025335803627968,
-0.06997024267911911,
-0.006994393654167652,
0.010092707350850105,
-0.08854113519191742,
0.0353463850915432,
0.08383610099554062,
0.0725039392709732,
0.10215277969837189,
0.08075635880231857,
-0.05532098188996315,
-0.005298586096614599,
0.040254153311252594,
-0.05456404760479927,
0.06443655490875244,
0.011463452130556107,
0.03175519034266472,
-0.02493252046406269,
0.0037851918023079634,
-0.006974718067795038,
-0.05058665946125984,
-0.04246216267347336,
-0.005300699733197689,
0.05803754925727844,
-0.06934566795825958,
-0.02122105285525322,
0.013940038159489632,
0.00820552185177803,
-0.05932733789086342,
0.004137963522225618,
-0.04080692306160927,
0.08074955642223358,
0.03765063360333443,
0.028163481503725052,
-0.061799559742212296,
-0.007673710118979216,
-0.017046192660927773,
0.05801830068230629,
-0.0044105579145252705,
-0.024708492681384087,
-0.0432012639939785,
0.011225329712033272,
-0.10119140893220901,
0.016484083607792854,
-0.07480153441429138,
-0.031879935413599014,
-0.044801197946071625,
0.07937431335449219,
0.0501960925757885,
0.04857126250863075,
0.1612718403339386,
0.0976203978061676,
-0.09191672503948212,
0.01832393929362297,
0.008040732704102993,
-0.022990219295024872,
0.01818595454096794,
-0.023216823115944862,
0.0110450005158782,
0.006010611075907946,
0.034068699926137924,
0.054513122886419296,
0.0409276969730854,
0.08157012611627579,
-0.03061249479651451,
-0.036258529871702194,
-0.017303669825196266,
0.0361371673643589,
0.00005002430407330394,
-0.04287562146782875,
-0.010987321846187115,
-0.058080002665519714,
0.015757892280817032,
0.032380204647779465,
0.024320028722286224,
0.0310581773519516,
-0.047425031661987305,
-0.06972356885671616,
-0.02751266397535801,
0.07418488711118698,
0.06222590059041977,
-0.04174121469259262,
-0.00931627955287695,
0.054993413388729095,
0.019709480926394463,
-0.04174640402197838,
-0.017039716243743896,
-0.04542424902319908,
0.04695791006088257,
-0.008742247708141804,
-0.051539063453674316,
0.06949261575937271,
-0.06029537320137024,
0.003193651093170047,
0.002143276622518897,
0.020284533500671387,
-0.036073118448257446,
0.0001231225032825023,
-0.033985793590545654,
-0.046950601041316986,
3.83075645909935e-33,
0.031616322696208954,
0.053197119385004044,
-0.05560053512454033,
-0.05745261535048485,
-0.013937722891569138,
-0.028912300243973732,
-0.00958208180963993,
-0.03193036839365959,
0.07227271795272827,
-0.033199284225702286,
-0.051065001636743546,
0.02797814831137657,
0.025452380999922752,
0.08890394866466522,
0.033958058804273605,
-0.13375915586948395,
0.0009706925484351814,
-0.011852992698550224,
0.01007878128439188,
0.020605886355042458,
0.019904572516679764,
-0.05343508720397949,
-0.014254364185035229,
-0.06928738206624985,
0.1326752007007599,
-0.049913570284843445,
0.004225614946335554,
-0.015110982581973076,
-0.002487640827894211,
0.068757064640522,
-0.010336273349821568,
0.02614050917327404,
0.05283263325691223,
0.05073895677924156,
0.04788617044687271,
-0.007244837004691362,
-0.0005750692798756063,
0.0424271859228611,
-0.009345327503979206,
-0.09406521916389465,
0.03643294423818588,
0.00699393916875124,
-0.005314482841640711,
0.05789045989513397,
-0.0012361466651782393,
-0.02698918618261814,
0.1426757574081421,
0.04817764461040497,
0.07058446854352951,
-0.04835353419184685,
-0.021335085853934288,
0.02526930905878544,
-0.0334964282810688,
-0.072106271982193,
-0.03925627842545509,
-0.07976589351892471,
0.024649685248732567,
-0.03733475133776665,
0.05371224135160446,
-0.04277172312140465,
-0.04730413854122162,
0.05124349519610405,
-0.004720072261989117,
0.0967777892947197,
0.04090539738535881,
-0.046662844717502594,
-0.042698949575424194,
0.008869506418704987,
0.037467364221811295,
-0.018579402938485146,
0.011471220292150974,
-0.05289028584957123,
0.06618528068065643,
0.06665080040693283,
-0.10194580256938934,
-0.015380604192614555,
-0.013732659630477428,
0.13065533339977264,
-0.052667971700429916,
0.06421313434839249,
-0.07737821340560913,
0.004924393258988857,
0.04220056161284447,
-0.019977329298853874,
0.10775739699602127,
-0.02187924273312092,
0.02455281838774681,
0.03175438940525055,
-0.0065296124666929245,
-0.00015037691628094763,
0.02286158688366413,
-0.026438944041728973,
0.014952984638512135,
-0.00024931016378104687,
0.03718157112598419,
-6.301970682184198e-33,
0.03239191323518753,
0.020288482308387756,
0.03697960823774338,
-0.09108307212591171,
-0.0899915024638176,
0.025463877245783806,
0.014152669347822666,
-0.11351525783538818,
0.05129602551460266,
-0.03219348564743996,
-0.06949464976787567,
0.043470073491334915,
0.012472301721572876,
0.056191034615039825,
0.04974420368671417,
-0.06876206398010254,
-0.0034669965971261263,
-0.011417874135077,
-0.02372891455888748,
-0.011751826852560043,
0.0380093976855278,
-0.02171984314918518,
-0.027959534898400307,
0.045713406056165695,
0.013476422056555748,
0.06257344037294388,
-0.026734115555882454,
-0.022269755601882935,
0.0469837449491024,
-0.006639955099672079,
-0.054362569004297256,
-0.002645355649292469,
-0.059651490300893784,
0.06796818226575851,
-0.1003611758351326,
0.010434678755700588,
0.005114285741001368,
0.03352481871843338,
-0.07241188734769821,
-0.012465652078390121,
0.08327718079090118,
-0.012252491898834705,
-0.03229349106550217,
0.033569205552339554,
0.004348341375589371,
-0.03994927555322647,
0.04919665306806564,
-0.049944739788770676,
-0.10653243958950043,
-0.02019873820245266,
-0.026149919256567955,
0.02621227130293846,
-0.03000667504966259,
-0.0027899385895580053,
0.029603704810142517,
0.06822561472654343,
0.06646823137998581,
0.011520051397383213,
0.02631489746272564,
-0.05272004380822182,
0.08025696873664856,
0.06304192543029785,
-0.034411314874887466,
-0.042736541479825974,
-0.018481722101569176,
-0.01057618111371994,
-0.022051816806197166,
-0.14834295213222504,
0.047404974699020386,
-0.03749512508511543,
-0.021104684099555016,
-0.06090131774544716,
-0.07171601057052612,
-0.09647659957408905,
-0.06096327304840088,
0.03753133863210678,
0.018803948536515236,
-0.024873973801732063,
-0.09896577894687653,
0.04632716253399849,
0.06505901366472244,
0.03698708117008209,
-0.05409710481762886,
-0.02011800743639469,
0.04862606152892113,
-0.013706907629966736,
0.029197826981544495,
-0.0643237829208374,
-0.03402058407664299,
0.07414551079273224,
-0.15007264912128448,
-0.042238254100084305,
-0.035662710666656494,
0.0895460844039917,
-0.036851465702056885,
-6.380111727821713e-8,
0.025226324796676636,
0.10262429714202881,
-0.03493485599756241,
-0.0383603535592556,
-0.01887614093720913,
-0.09395429491996765,
0.009083021432161331,
-0.006970102898776531,
-0.059252411127090454,
0.04586976021528244,
0.0696418359875679,
0.020940301939845085,
-0.02925354242324829,
-0.03487468883395195,
-0.06069445237517357,
-0.07684127986431122,
-0.040351931005716324,
0.051658108830451965,
-0.06339208781719208,
-0.0023157219402492046,
-0.01299992110580206,
-0.03937438875436783,
-0.11570817977190018,
0.08983898907899857,
-0.03629697859287262,
0.05557478219270706,
0.023855173960328102,
0.07449997216463089,
0.10074657201766968,
0.036459892988204956,
0.007850377820432186,
0.10160759091377258,
-0.04950049892067909,
-0.027131985872983932,
-0.03862090781331062,
-0.03399592265486717,
-0.021612171083688736,
0.011022282764315605,
0.08673795312643051,
0.0314948745071888,
-0.03495703637599945,
0.035509202629327774,
0.02207951992750168,
0.032529089599847794,
-0.005936028435826302,
0.014528377912938595,
-0.09698934108018875,
-0.051757995039224625,
0.02528855763375759,
-0.05806040018796921,
0.020827539265155792,
-0.04742133989930153,
-0.034901559352874756,
0.09351351112127304,
0.030425235629081726,
0.002916814759373665,
-0.019238870590925217,
-0.11434916406869888,
-0.019079484045505524,
-0.009687239304184914,
-0.010340897366404533,
-0.11217214167118073,
-0.0007043031509965658,
-0.0005258637247607112
] | {
"pdf_file": "4C5BLCGBSAKXLBL674TCFLMNISKMFTF7.pdf",
"text": "CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE Douglas W. Elmendorf, Director \nU.S. Congress Washington, DC 20515 \n \n July 15, 2013 \n Honorable Bill Shuster Chairman Committee on Transportation \n and Infrastructure \nU.S. House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Dear Mr. Chairman: The Congressional Budget Office has reviewed H.R. 2611, a bill to \ndesignate the headquarters building of the Coast Guard on the campus \nlocated at 2701 Martin Luth er King Jr. Avenue, Southeast, in the District of \nColumbia as the “Douglas A. Munro Coast Guard Headquarters Building,” \nas ordered reported by the Hous e Committee on Transportation and \nInfrastructure on July 10, 2013. \n \nCBO estimates that enacting this le gislation would have no significant \nimpact on the federal budget and woul d not affect direct spending or \nrevenues; therefore, pay-as-you-go procedures do not apply. The bill \ncontains no intergovernmental or privat e-sector mandates as defined in the \nUnfunded Mandates Reform Act and wo uld impose no costs on state, local, \nor tribal governments. \nIf you wish further details on this estim ate, we will be pleased to provide \nthem. The CBO staff contacts are Ma ggie Morrissey and Matthew Pickford. \n Sincerely, \n \n Douglas W. Elmendorf \n cc: Honorable Nick J. Rahall II Ranking Member \n"
} |
[
-0.041322484612464905,
-0.04816538468003273,
0.006380183156579733,
0.008461352437734604,
0.07033100724220276,
-0.04632798954844475,
0.04143790155649185,
0.04216868802905083,
-0.00392671674489975,
0.05216117948293686,
0.08585945516824722,
0.043509241193532944,
-0.010227246209979057,
0.025186799466609955,
0.005473582074046135,
0.052339162677526474,
-0.05347318574786186,
-0.011834795586764812,
-0.036212772130966187,
0.011081407777965069,
0.08308790624141693,
0.07415857166051865,
-0.039604898542165756,
0.03444584459066391,
-0.051756519824266434,
-0.04119233042001724,
-0.02056301385164261,
-0.0447794646024704,
-0.04618477076292038,
0.015466916374862194,
-0.037398263812065125,
0.04355828836560249,
0.02260906621813774,
0.032580453902482986,
0.04278283566236496,
-0.02426951937377453,
0.0643317699432373,
-0.08727031946182251,
0.07361897826194763,
-0.09030511230230331,
-0.014965547248721123,
-0.05512312427163124,
0.04253116250038147,
0.04734303802251816,
-0.06371650844812393,
-0.0743105560541153,
0.02414078824222088,
0.03281015530228615,
-0.009478059597313404,
0.12110976874828339,
0.11382719874382019,
-0.014376077800989151,
-0.028064871206879616,
-0.028689946979284286,
-0.0025108272675424814,
0.10071118175983429,
-0.04099662974476814,
-0.028658099472522736,
0.03416081517934799,
-0.0001285004400415346,
-0.019244281575083733,
0.053951408714056015,
-0.08812935650348663,
0.0032774389255791903,
-0.04499370977282524,
-0.024827832356095314,
0.04975879192352295,
-0.08304015547037125,
0.07748617231845856,
-0.026325881481170654,
0.025070566684007645,
-0.03800905495882034,
-0.034597426652908325,
0.09920832514762878,
0.0037523959763348103,
-0.010737166740000248,
0.023846875876188278,
0.08691760152578354,
-0.012808733619749546,
-0.05925580486655235,
0.004072621464729309,
0.0031035970896482468,
-0.018415547907352448,
-0.0490221343934536,
0.048739295452833176,
-0.03895179554820061,
-0.0810534656047821,
0.07349124550819397,
0.07446815073490143,
0.05848463997244835,
0.06807079911231995,
-0.04681887850165367,
0.036717940121889114,
0.026184698566794395,
-0.022078631445765495,
-0.04060869663953781,
-0.009847370907664299,
0.0018715322948992252,
-0.04740714281797409,
0.11399190872907639,
0.09934840351343155,
0.02294667810201645,
-0.10517788678407669,
-0.022780826315283775,
0.026318417862057686,
0.013453127816319466,
0.005198693834245205,
-0.0875675305724144,
-0.03320087492465973,
0.0269909854978323,
-0.06864435970783234,
-0.0386287160217762,
-0.0012598605826497078,
-0.08272456377744675,
-0.08227989822626114,
0.11517870426177979,
-0.0029893694445490837,
0.019977746531367302,
-0.03658297657966614,
-0.14926950633525848,
0.002501747105270624,
-0.05015179142355919,
0.05974619835615158,
-0.07420004159212112,
-0.02234417386353016,
-0.0513736866414547,
0.04037925601005554,
4.907307981044987e-33,
-0.05752335861325264,
0.019839780405163765,
0.04560431092977524,
0.07061228901147842,
0.028204895555973053,
0.0014016671339049935,
0.018186232075095177,
-0.00004986516432836652,
0.03968716040253639,
-0.014209016226232052,
-0.13289733231067657,
-0.021117132157087326,
-0.02046755887567997,
-0.06235446035861969,
0.02820056490600109,
-0.0011342765064910054,
0.0009867144981399179,
-0.03187301382422447,
0.039671458303928375,
0.004843877162784338,
0.029689716175198555,
-0.049036528915166855,
-0.010417981073260307,
-0.02126680314540863,
0.03389475867152214,
0.010176158510148525,
-0.10309747606515884,
-0.05630176141858101,
0.013177902437746525,
0.06325695663690567,
-0.022831950336694717,
0.07653961330652237,
0.0759321078658104,
-0.007281691767275333,
0.0374673493206501,
0.004032142926007509,
-0.03444668650627136,
-0.0753357857465744,
-0.03769538179039955,
0.01615549437701702,
0.03778397664427757,
-0.004238541703671217,
-0.07179664075374603,
0.05740441381931305,
0.006996179930865765,
-0.053419504314661026,
0.00850360281765461,
0.12887312471866608,
0.08579185605049133,
0.08406316488981247,
0.0029780245386064053,
0.03183042258024216,
-0.042429473251104355,
-0.08080781996250153,
-0.03696870431303978,
0.001283455640077591,
-0.05733058601617813,
0.03953200951218605,
0.050993092358112335,
-0.027306849136948586,
0.01982051692903042,
0.05004078894853592,
0.006653461139649153,
-0.014978080987930298,
-0.008124535903334618,
0.047151654958724976,
-0.09436547756195068,
-0.009934886358678341,
0.029508991166949272,
-0.040176499634981155,
0.03466939926147461,
-0.04301539808511734,
-0.04180566594004631,
0.02601860649883747,
0.04846515133976936,
-0.049792371690273285,
0.053046733140945435,
0.029896777123212814,
0.015712501481175423,
-0.06144212558865547,
-0.040618520230054855,
0.04285753518342972,
0.07179025560617447,
0.013590000569820404,
0.019997594878077507,
-0.0031550386920571327,
0.04547310993075371,
0.09268459677696228,
-0.022809436544775963,
0.039922695606946945,
0.01981014758348465,
0.07029197365045547,
0.007599520497024059,
0.020351072773337364,
0.10033966600894928,
-6.043072826861389e-33,
-0.024663273245096207,
0.0037009024526923895,
-0.09119131416082382,
-0.05671702325344086,
-0.02274184860289097,
-0.06785586476325989,
0.029443182051181793,
0.01852249540388584,
-0.0018323227996006608,
-0.07148963212966919,
-0.06533464789390564,
-0.10616320371627808,
0.033997371792793274,
0.0629897490143776,
0.009599672630429268,
0.01804441772401333,
-0.04915910214185715,
-0.020264150574803352,
-0.03940650075674057,
0.0667944848537445,
-0.039630040526390076,
-0.03232254087924957,
0.04506338760256767,
0.03351395204663277,
-0.05263163894414902,
-0.031932346522808075,
0.06294603645801544,
-0.04290622100234032,
-0.017449960112571716,
-0.0036555095575749874,
-0.0264739990234375,
0.019971027970314026,
-0.04612397402524948,
0.1067725419998169,
-0.01795106567442417,
-0.08502275496721268,
0.08737678825855255,
0.03137274086475372,
-0.023311544209718704,
0.03568292781710625,
0.018468353897333145,
0.03484398499131203,
0.059053175151348114,
0.032719772309064865,
-0.03253597021102905,
-0.026523087173700333,
0.06212017685174942,
-0.04881244897842407,
-0.13471335172653198,
-0.10769638419151306,
-0.010554073378443718,
-0.0433562770485878,
0.02473096176981926,
0.04224130138754845,
0.10066648572683334,
0.05111450329422951,
0.07359734922647476,
-0.016029860824346542,
0.043586231768131256,
-0.03807409852743149,
0.03211496025323868,
0.06820853054523468,
-0.09471510350704193,
0.006305302958935499,
0.13663525879383087,
-0.053913768380880356,
0.00892759207636118,
0.013262835331261158,
0.05553301423788071,
-0.03350985050201416,
0.004359748214483261,
-0.10844418406486511,
-0.11259783804416656,
-0.04284355044364929,
0.05818833038210869,
-0.053467750549316406,
0.04283493757247925,
-0.007192531134933233,
-0.06539585441350937,
-0.029988566413521767,
-0.0326276458799839,
0.024058546870946884,
-0.02815614454448223,
-0.01882568746805191,
-0.043567974120378494,
0.021730121225118637,
0.07015620172023773,
-0.07314512133598328,
0.004089721478521824,
0.1014314815402031,
-0.0443037673830986,
0.05327737331390381,
-0.03999532014131546,
0.009164719842374325,
-0.04638194292783737,
-5.5356935035888455e-8,
-0.037232063710689545,
0.04039519652724266,
-0.03539351746439934,
0.0720847100019455,
0.010565554723143578,
0.04681038483977318,
-0.01339381467550993,
-0.006823199801146984,
-0.034692730754613876,
-0.05768797919154167,
0.0644967183470726,
0.00451426999643445,
-0.01798706315457821,
-0.05116470158100128,
-0.020988240838050842,
-0.003908801823854446,
-0.09900076687335968,
0.08024418354034424,
-0.07698773592710495,
-0.012422852218151093,
-0.08302941173315048,
0.06881575286388397,
-0.050717175006866455,
0.006326930597424507,
-0.006893706973642111,
0.008924255147576332,
-0.0019437815062701702,
0.10593818128108978,
0.07915414124727249,
-0.030068809166550636,
-0.05308365449309349,
-0.0037825123872607946,
-0.0694584771990776,
-0.04121975973248482,
-0.06049751862883568,
-0.01590813137590885,
-0.007098085712641478,
-0.04005447402596474,
0.0003386579337529838,
0.026538148522377014,
-0.006164798978716135,
0.0816841796040535,
-0.02771870605647564,
0.03171133995056152,
0.05255718156695366,
-0.010636325925588608,
-0.028031261637806892,
-0.008615226484835148,
0.015266472473740578,
-0.01190533209592104,
-0.002299613319337368,
-0.036498624831438065,
0.027913114055991173,
0.048384666442871094,
0.053020939230918884,
-0.02650699019432068,
-0.03381534665822983,
-0.03247321769595146,
-0.03574149310588837,
-0.020590806379914284,
-0.043645408004522324,
-0.008921013213694096,
-0.04679771140217781,
0.03814968839287758
] | {
"pdf_file": "K7W2OAWSV6AHYASOUV4LTOEUEIFNTE6D.pdf",
"text": " NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN\n DOCKET OST-97-2675\nThis serves as interim notice to the public of the action described below, taken orally by the\nDepartment official indicated; the confirming order or other decision document will be issued\nas soon as possible.\nApplicant: Compania Panamena de Aviacion S.A. Date Filed: July 2, 1997\nRelief requested : Exemption from 49 U.S.C. § 41301 to conduct scheduled foreign air\ntransportation of persons, property and mail from points behind the Republic of Panama\nvia the Republic of Panama and intermediate points to a point or points in the United\nStates and beyond; charter foreign air transportation pursuant to the Air Transport\nAgreement between the United States and the Republic of Panama; and other charters\nsubject to Part 212 of our rules.\nIf renewal, date and citation of last action: New authority\nApplicant representative: John R. Brimsek (202) 296-8000\nResponsive Pleadings: None filed\nDISPOSITION\nAction: Approved Action date: Februa ry 19, 1998\nEffective dates of authority granted: February 19, 1998-February 19, 2000\nBasis for approval (bilateral agreement/reciprocity): May 8, 1997, Air Transport\nAgreement between the United States and the Republic of Panama, in force provisionally\n(the Agreement)\nExcept to the extent exempted/waived, this authority is subject to the terms, conditions, and\nlimitations indicated : Compania Panamena de Aviacion S.A.’s foreign air carrier permit\n(Order 85-12-29) and the Agreement\nSpecial conditions/Partial grant/Denial basis/Remarks:\nAction taken by:\nPaul L. Gretch, Director\nOffice of International Aviation\nunder assigned authority (14 CFR 385)\n(Petitions for review may be filed from now until 10 days after the service date of the\nconfirming order/letter. Filing of a petition shall not stay the effectiveness of this action.)"
} |
[
0.05518100783228874,
-0.03801290690898895,
-0.001126695773564279,
0.07329126447439194,
-0.02160903625190258,
0.026927053928375244,
-0.07960228621959686,
0.003378342604264617,
-0.05535911023616791,
-0.010513786226511002,
-0.018644995987415314,
-0.02756565809249878,
0.027313774451613426,
-0.004254890140146017,
-0.026329405605793,
0.0033553310204297304,
0.09965720027685165,
0.044532764703035355,
0.03108152560889721,
-0.10943930596113205,
0.012445005588233471,
0.013757077045738697,
0.043493133038282394,
-0.035193923860788345,
-0.02409929409623146,
-0.04128468036651611,
-0.02559911645948887,
0.006074096541851759,
-0.05114517733454704,
-0.0355205163359642,
-0.017289793118834496,
-0.021705349907279015,
-0.0781264454126358,
0.009314354509115219,
0.034726161509752274,
-0.07562548667192459,
-0.014365537092089653,
0.05532426759600639,
0.10858586430549622,
-0.04461183398962021,
0.03206685557961464,
-0.003460219129920006,
-0.0738716572523117,
-0.06430094689130783,
-0.048779215663671494,
0.06247830018401146,
-0.033557720482349396,
0.06198664382100105,
0.027012264356017113,
-0.04281030595302582,
0.06074680760502815,
0.027551399543881416,
0.053106702864170074,
0.008357947692275047,
0.0007420577458105981,
0.0404118187725544,
0.06780143082141876,
0.07331468909978867,
-0.050184570252895355,
0.07350512593984604,
0.03647676110267639,
-0.009669916704297066,
0.007693876512348652,
-0.02291347272694111,
-0.026395248249173164,
0.0006468389183282852,
-0.06634663790464401,
-0.017236940562725067,
-0.06869219988584518,
-0.12284447252750397,
-0.023219259455800056,
-0.07856810837984085,
0.008440307341516018,
0.009698702953755856,
0.055875714868307114,
-0.0009923321194946766,
-0.017243169248104095,
0.04816373065114021,
0.0327959880232811,
-0.07006576657295227,
-0.030036216601729393,
-0.02497107908129692,
0.06845948845148087,
0.029494646936655045,
-0.09573473781347275,
0.0618816614151001,
0.020300161093473434,
0.0023351474665105343,
0.016355305910110474,
-0.03672098368406296,
-0.018908517435193062,
0.030295463278889656,
-0.08969931304454803,
-0.06387381255626678,
0.12127571552991867,
0.0226714126765728,
-0.0278171356767416,
0.02014201506972313,
0.005243760999292135,
-0.03438566252589226,
0.04334530606865883,
-0.03746568039059639,
0.021974992007017136,
-0.050435688346624374,
-0.035408105701208115,
-0.013581013306975365,
0.017285224050283432,
0.00025046488735824823,
-0.105760857462883,
0.05174225941300392,
0.015261111781001091,
-0.014828921295702457,
-0.025941936299204826,
-0.007923432625830173,
0.07899389415979385,
0.0321158841252327,
0.03578851744532585,
-0.002986135194078088,
-0.010373542085289955,
0.120631143450737,
-0.03531291335821152,
0.0018572149565443397,
-0.028965679928660393,
0.08118391036987305,
0.14091508090496063,
0.018055608496069908,
0.008627792820334435,
2.1807932826928316e-33,
0.03273690119385719,
0.06858818978071213,
0.03558729961514473,
0.017905425280332565,
0.013412700966000557,
-0.04969651252031326,
-0.014088064432144165,
-0.04512974992394447,
-0.006729620974510908,
0.05728866904973984,
-0.06297724694013596,
-0.019421042874455452,
0.02695145644247532,
-0.08269298076629639,
-0.06709721684455872,
0.016256101429462433,
-0.01052612904459238,
0.04233923554420471,
-0.09072282910346985,
0.0079146483913064,
0.009255077689886093,
-0.03470507264137268,
-0.06150968000292778,
0.07243284583091736,
-0.05577735975384712,
0.028929859399795532,
-0.050563178956508636,
0.053406327962875366,
-0.011280213482677937,
-0.001941664726473391,
-0.014092718251049519,
-0.05372651666402817,
0.02566443756222725,
-0.05457296594977379,
-0.11425156146287918,
-0.02657127007842064,
-0.04319118708372116,
-0.0020393459126353264,
-0.020864278078079224,
-0.01982477679848671,
0.0026193102821707726,
0.006624019239097834,
0.03682488203048706,
0.0474376417696476,
-0.004347131121903658,
0.006242075469344854,
0.0529143325984478,
-0.00944781769067049,
0.006681851577013731,
-0.06363988667726517,
0.02021631971001625,
-0.017229437828063965,
0.025844614952802658,
0.011017443612217903,
0.0290229469537735,
0.09985792636871338,
0.028722567483782768,
-0.09110795706510544,
0.08032261580228806,
-0.003616876667365432,
0.04914907366037369,
0.0064223515801131725,
-0.07351678609848022,
-0.045357316732406616,
0.021669790148735046,
0.05275944247841835,
0.023595931008458138,
0.06311646103858948,
0.08214586228132248,
0.007795472629368305,
0.03842400759458542,
-0.007893076166510582,
0.048155151307582855,
0.0906098484992981,
0.09966728091239929,
0.10381247103214264,
0.014265678822994232,
0.031051140278577805,
-0.025554489344358444,
-0.027639521285891533,
-0.007810524664819241,
-0.0392477810382843,
-0.026203038170933723,
-0.05039101839065552,
0.17313867807388306,
-0.0816369578242302,
-0.10601502656936646,
-0.02214539237320423,
0.020353594794869423,
0.04655332863330841,
0.08090987801551819,
0.016672752797603607,
-0.017932403832674026,
0.015473272651433945,
-0.06918199360370636,
-2.0112116921974082e-33,
-0.023997167125344276,
0.07838546484708786,
0.0006884252070449293,
-0.047592729330062866,
0.0009804245783016086,
0.011073264293372631,
-0.04154525697231293,
-0.08732761442661285,
0.07148848474025726,
-0.05512511357665062,
-0.07140904664993286,
-0.07481524348258972,
-0.019072558730840683,
0.05509170889854431,
-0.09759876877069473,
0.031183281913399696,
-0.09166225790977478,
-0.042243387550115585,
0.05222804844379425,
0.04899895563721657,
-0.05966414511203766,
-0.0378405787050724,
-0.003056440269574523,
-0.010391081683337688,
0.049044106155633926,
0.015325471758842468,
-0.13639824092388153,
-0.06958465278148651,
0.06458187848329544,
0.06095827743411064,
0.01267948281019926,
-0.10408665984869003,
0.05275595560669899,
-0.021618563681840897,
0.0009241009829565883,
-0.12564118206501007,
-0.017854463309049606,
0.018424423411488533,
0.07001989334821701,
-0.030636651441454887,
-0.08719316869974136,
0.028596794232726097,
-0.034580424427986145,
-0.06809790432453156,
-0.017512474209070206,
-0.0058964891359210014,
-0.00882659200578928,
-0.004205408506095409,
-0.028205139562487602,
-0.0007856381707824767,
0.009072830900549889,
0.04622546210885048,
0.0017613418167456985,
0.04332563281059265,
-0.08204057067632675,
0.039534792304039,
0.07326941937208176,
0.07756568491458893,
-0.02117311768233776,
0.05498676747083664,
0.041635870933532715,
-0.008123086765408516,
0.018450411036610603,
0.10595661401748657,
0.026915930211544037,
-0.056345388293266296,
-0.07030502706766129,
-0.01641520857810974,
-0.013949302025139332,
-0.07297657430171967,
-0.03050418198108673,
-0.06173202022910118,
0.0419963076710701,
0.032247550785541534,
0.02242380566895008,
0.0723244845867157,
0.07479892671108246,
0.0542612262070179,
-0.01748974435031414,
0.06311030685901642,
-0.08077964931726456,
-0.0024864969309419394,
-0.08659174293279648,
-0.016637567430734634,
-0.05003507807850838,
0.08772411197423935,
0.005847984924912453,
-0.0861833468079567,
-0.03279295936226845,
-0.06854281574487686,
-0.06252647936344147,
0.03334846720099449,
-0.04113878682255745,
0.0382828526198864,
0.012832383625209332,
-4.933566088993757e-8,
0.07138317078351974,
0.0696771964430809,
0.06549271941184998,
0.010905790142714977,
0.07183530926704407,
0.00009203218360198662,
0.054513853043317795,
0.08513729274272919,
0.0029437029734253883,
0.020061880350112915,
-0.010224021971225739,
0.02623271383345127,
0.04260861501097679,
-0.05411521717905998,
0.0007055670139379799,
0.05593032389879227,
-0.06686383485794067,
-0.05286714434623718,
0.05737064406275749,
-0.042909953743219376,
0.032815296202898026,
-0.0213914941996336,
-0.05626126006245613,
0.011418593116104603,
0.006343075539916754,
-0.03221767768263817,
-0.031139850616455078,
0.016637858003377914,
-0.035193149000406265,
-0.026717357337474823,
0.01851346716284752,
0.03224515914916992,
0.07854685932397842,
-0.04546234384179115,
0.034482527524232864,
0.04900844022631645,
0.004676884040236473,
0.040108904242515564,
-0.00031297351233661175,
0.0363500602543354,
0.06068875640630722,
-0.004780292976647615,
0.09781011193990707,
-0.048716235905885696,
0.014161614701151848,
0.03285017982125282,
0.15800000727176666,
-0.05416238680481911,
0.07011502981185913,
-0.022388016805052757,
-0.022655708715319633,
0.0048268865793943405,
0.02882663905620575,
-0.05482255294919014,
0.0009014288662001491,
0.0006139272009022534,
-0.0002547053445596248,
-0.06860382854938507,
0.08411906659603119,
0.019701790064573288,
0.015344143845140934,
0.01755770482122898,
0.05124989151954651,
0.04303491860628128
] | {
"pdf_file": "UEMMUYNAALNXKRS5ILRPOG726T7H5LFC.pdf",
"text": " \nCounty Highlights Home \nFayette County, IN Highlights \nIntroduction \nThe first edition of the County Highlights was published in 1993. Lillian Miles, then \nLabor Market Analyst for the Gary Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area, or iginated \nthe idea for this descriptive area publication. \nHighlights are now a web publication and, as a result, the data can be updated \nthroughout the year, not just on an annual basis. These Highlights are available in \neasy-to-use web format but are also printable and e-mailable and provide a snapshot of \ncritical population and workforce statistics for each of Indiana’s 92 counties, 11 \nEconomic Growth Regions, and the State of Indiana. \nEach Highlights includes an overview of the demographics and workforce of an area, \nfrom its population to the size of its labor force and the industry mix of jobs and wages. \nDon’t hesitate to contact your regional analyst, Sharon Ringenberg (260-469-4217) if you need furthe r information \nabout your area. \nLocation \nFayette County is located in east central Indiana. The county is bordered on the south by Frankli n County. Union \nCounty is adjacent to Fayette County on the east, Henry County and Wayne County to the north, and Rush County to \nthe west. Fayette County is one of the nine counties located in the area designated by the India na Department of \nWorkforce Development as Indiana Economic Growth Region 6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8\nOverview Population Education Commuting Labor Force Industry Income Firm Size \n"
} |
[
-0.00009967189544113353,
0.07592093199491501,
0.012848942540585995,
-0.021325109526515007,
0.031566932797431946,
0.01801769807934761,
0.103120818734169,
-0.06842568516731262,
-0.1145511046051979,
-0.05546125769615173,
0.008434799499809742,
0.06464096158742905,
-0.03441376984119415,
0.017102032899856567,
0.026658564805984497,
-0.00027418730314821005,
-0.012932064011693,
0.009453834965825081,
0.001688723568804562,
0.061928484588861465,
0.025516249239444733,
0.07781146466732025,
0.014628812670707703,
0.004340001847594976,
0.001958420965820551,
0.013272981159389019,
-0.03107556141912937,
-0.0593012198805809,
0.01257175300270319,
-0.05175058916211128,
0.029011761769652367,
-0.006311940960586071,
-0.08142756670713425,
0.0018097760621458292,
0.09482705593109131,
-0.029558854177594185,
0.03425700590014458,
0.08552655577659607,
-0.04499150067567825,
0.03331505134701729,
0.00892649032175541,
0.01647845469415188,
-0.04133107513189316,
-0.00904091726988554,
-0.06696566939353943,
-0.010047592222690582,
-0.0738527700304985,
-0.07430630922317505,
0.05550210922956467,
0.008321226574480534,
-0.01330498419702053,
-0.0219513438642025,
-0.02689477987587452,
-0.01880050264298916,
-0.00847852323204279,
-0.018701989203691483,
0.07237136363983154,
-0.0040964060463011265,
-0.03076200745999813,
-0.06891635060310364,
-0.07824458926916122,
-0.07133364677429199,
0.033673591911792755,
-0.013411154970526695,
0.015700194984674454,
-0.03543439880013466,
-0.023947598412632942,
-0.007283937186002731,
-0.01861042156815529,
-0.048351649194955826,
-0.11484616994857788,
-0.04745078086853027,
0.032643962651491165,
-0.030665399506688118,
-0.066531702876091,
-0.015760986134409904,
0.04740513861179352,
-0.013065345585346222,
0.0008233452099375427,
-0.036719243973493576,
0.0526837594807148,
0.03750069439411163,
0.0030821210239082575,
0.014059405773878098,
0.044498004019260406,
0.0211478304117918,
-0.019909236580133438,
-0.013934308663010597,
0.11763542890548706,
-0.010396941564977169,
-0.03765260800719261,
0.06469352543354034,
0.05735478922724724,
0.06083374470472336,
-0.0016013139393180609,
-0.05448068678379059,
0.010285860858857632,
0.018118076026439667,
-0.113810695707798,
0.0948767140507698,
0.0426441915333271,
-0.009312975220382214,
-0.013454843312501907,
-0.10265824943780899,
0.08726207911968231,
-0.007279688026756048,
-0.04032926261425018,
-0.019017398357391357,
0.07093161344528198,
-0.01998746022582054,
0.01324509922415018,
-0.019431091845035553,
0.07830794155597687,
-0.003239687765017152,
0.021402347832918167,
0.05467865988612175,
-0.04787663742899895,
-0.034077633172273636,
0.02281239815056324,
0.029558923095464706,
0.1031404435634613,
0.007745119743049145,
0.007588255684822798,
-0.060019973665475845,
0.05554276704788208,
-0.05431345850229263,
-0.043129704892635345,
-2.002811132021852e-33,
-0.024760225787758827,
0.010519067756831646,
0.036890480667352676,
0.02831082046031952,
0.1058569997549057,
-0.029843684285879135,
-0.028656091541051865,
-0.01401299424469471,
0.001484721782617271,
0.0026033492758870125,
-0.06623602658510208,
-0.05109822750091553,
-0.12491355091333389,
-0.04597659409046173,
-0.04131944850087166,
-0.06966116279363632,
-0.09788931906223297,
0.0029368263203650713,
0.042357590049505234,
0.026410812512040138,
0.07714425027370453,
-0.028418606147170067,
-0.01487363688647747,
-0.05810169130563736,
-0.0372893363237381,
0.018978925421833992,
-0.0029305678326636553,
-0.06260977685451508,
0.08052800595760345,
0.08900611847639084,
0.014821048825979233,
0.051303617656230927,
-0.003294888650998473,
-0.037060897797346115,
-0.05652409791946411,
0.011378864757716656,
-0.01438892912119627,
-0.0228760726749897,
-0.047312796115875244,
0.020561208948493004,
-0.04326322302222252,
-0.03609559312462807,
0.059566330164670944,
0.022550998255610466,
-0.03484082221984863,
-0.04202951863408089,
0.08792375773191452,
0.03499618172645569,
-0.021648820489645004,
0.06311690807342529,
-0.00015169144899118692,
-0.03920275345444679,
0.061068907380104065,
-0.06514730304479599,
-0.020886702463030815,
-0.08934995532035828,
-0.027051830664277077,
-0.08078770339488983,
-0.033040981739759445,
-0.03593555837869644,
0.05320386588573456,
-0.029545597732067108,
0.0032097490038722754,
-0.05166468396782875,
-0.11076607555150986,
0.022654250264167786,
0.016858957707881927,
0.016539499163627625,
-0.02724945731461048,
0.04681311920285225,
-0.014816174283623695,
-0.01785474456846714,
0.009518344886600971,
-0.10092362016439438,
-0.046898096799850464,
0.006479037459939718,
0.0371268168091774,
0.021568145602941513,
-0.021647337824106216,
-0.0308014377951622,
0.10761907696723938,
-0.10468292981386185,
-0.050842899829149246,
-0.016337202861905098,
0.14461961388587952,
0.02749255672097206,
0.08375401049852371,
0.01696537435054779,
-0.012509642168879509,
-0.05083940178155899,
-0.04154825955629349,
-0.0007210941985249519,
0.10898551344871521,
0.007687130477279425,
0.021780185401439667,
5.917768710648083e-34,
0.019117338582873344,
0.03683635964989662,
0.004076294135302305,
-0.03631018102169037,
0.01850934885442257,
0.030439546331763268,
0.04013563692569733,
0.0410369336605072,
-0.030341066420078278,
0.07075580954551697,
-0.12439168244600296,
0.05398120731115341,
-0.02539723552763462,
0.07003041356801987,
0.02278948202729225,
-0.02861206606030464,
0.09223414957523346,
-0.08190055936574936,
-0.054264187812805176,
-0.03705783188343048,
-0.0712856575846672,
-0.028311150148510933,
-0.10536997765302658,
0.07018201798200607,
0.027724649757146835,
0.10274980217218399,
0.06605222076177597,
-0.029383402317762375,
0.03321471065282822,
0.003870244137942791,
-0.04098179563879967,
-0.004823815077543259,
0.033580441027879715,
0.029655063524842262,
0.03859151154756546,
0.019876902922987938,
-0.04244796186685562,
-0.12952512502670288,
-0.10039643198251724,
-0.044348783791065216,
-0.014901506714522839,
-0.00508937006816268,
0.030247405171394348,
0.0867806002497673,
0.03416092321276665,
-0.014926854521036148,
-0.0289476178586483,
-0.021607233211398125,
-0.06563477963209152,
0.06648489832878113,
0.017257308587431908,
0.00748763931915164,
-0.0077110701240599155,
0.01975049078464508,
-0.01609421893954277,
0.03470631688833237,
-0.019288159906864166,
0.02127985842525959,
-0.03785625100135803,
-0.021043090149760246,
-0.1086544394493103,
-0.061899784952402115,
-0.03473430871963501,
0.004421529825776815,
-0.021671202033758163,
-0.10542237013578415,
0.000558429688680917,
-0.04690057039260864,
0.05269034579396248,
-0.0055772908963263035,
0.012439088895916939,
0.007012818939983845,
-0.12457135319709778,
-0.07430123537778854,
-0.03905871510505676,
0.08645758032798767,
0.11086376756429672,
0.04425692930817604,
-0.010207828134298325,
0.023943256586790085,
-0.046324729919433594,
-0.03646601736545563,
0.03433089703321457,
0.011827265843749046,
-0.017732838168740273,
0.037525080144405365,
-0.06328564882278442,
0.07053182274103165,
0.01781017892062664,
0.06404726207256317,
0.04733804613351822,
0.11323660612106323,
0.02036249078810215,
0.059124354273080826,
0.013433233834803104,
-3.970532347352673e-8,
0.01738080382347107,
-0.004512302577495575,
0.005788217298686504,
-0.0016236061928793788,
0.04788513481616974,
-0.05539563298225403,
0.06319703161716461,
0.01615110971033573,
-0.06851406395435333,
0.08117201179265976,
0.15307460725307465,
0.08390668779611588,
0.06539007276296616,
0.08256784081459045,
0.03537210449576378,
0.03486084192991257,
0.005397567059844732,
-0.01853051222860813,
-0.03201492130756378,
0.07779846340417862,
0.0042477254755795,
-0.0062345582991838455,
-0.029195254668593407,
0.01952333375811577,
-0.07836044579744339,
-0.01685962826013565,
-0.021000569686293602,
0.014308733865618706,
-0.015466931276023388,
-0.026780009269714355,
0.020698631182312965,
0.06718060374259949,
-0.10488567501306534,
0.01022084429860115,
-0.0742485299706459,
-0.03615080937743187,
0.05074828118085861,
-0.028762437403202057,
0.004026623442769051,
0.026216736063361168,
0.010841386392712593,
-0.061774127185344696,
0.12439651042222977,
0.02228252775967121,
-0.038310591131448746,
0.029154673218727112,
0.04452906548976898,
-0.07773289084434509,
-0.02639121562242508,
-0.026103442534804344,
-0.025481408461928368,
-0.0014518130337819457,
0.008367455564439297,
0.0054589430801570415,
0.05276964232325554,
-0.019618753343820572,
-0.09898466616868973,
0.04273144528269768,
-0.05927787721157074,
0.01169318426400423,
0.06491953879594803,
0.03460299223661423,
-0.017139436677098274,
0.026422377675771713
] | {
"pdf_file": "GFZKIRYHHR2NZTPACKJY5MTG5X3CYGEX.pdf",
"text": "The Tax-Run Around\nI came across this cartoon yesterday. The day after tax day, you can breathe a sigh of relief, or\nsome of you may still be lost in the maze, either way this cartoon is very appropriate. I came\nacross this cartoon yesterday. The day after tax day, you can breathe a sigh of relief, or some of\nyou may still be lost in the maze, either way this cartoon is very appropriate.\n \n 1 / 1"
} |
[
-0.11883839964866638,
0.04829868674278259,
-0.0025480559561401606,
-0.011011209338903427,
0.05195074528455734,
0.010291832499206066,
0.1154332384467125,
0.0007007909007370472,
-0.08592535555362701,
-0.07065396010875702,
0.0013317164266481996,
-0.035472381860017776,
0.018434155732393265,
-0.006737178191542625,
0.024402987211942673,
-0.029503243044018745,
-0.058138374239206314,
-0.05043954402208328,
-0.020765526220202446,
0.029036032035946846,
-0.06367600709199905,
0.024029914289712906,
0.0262432973831892,
-0.006037362851202488,
-0.011076544411480427,
-0.0014006864512339234,
-0.018619801849126816,
0.03277004510164261,
0.0028860096354037523,
-0.05694391578435898,
-0.04394163936376572,
0.025414075702428818,
0.08790954202413559,
-0.02499123103916645,
-0.03668315336108208,
0.0062413448467850685,
-0.06646791845560074,
-0.0671444833278656,
0.020564241334795952,
0.04238877445459366,
0.021880215033888817,
-0.04288247600197792,
-0.03437700495123863,
0.06146686151623726,
0.0656372681260109,
-0.0785202905535698,
0.029487011954188347,
0.010798297822475433,
0.06332410126924515,
-0.04508465901017189,
-0.01823394186794758,
-0.027721041813492775,
-0.0036737609189003706,
-0.03659451752901077,
0.054250262677669525,
-0.02085655927658081,
0.015034922398626804,
-0.060095224529504776,
0.016393909230828285,
-0.03323858231306076,
0.01750349812209606,
-0.0005952207720838487,
-0.16348379850387573,
0.08492093533277512,
-0.07583844661712646,
0.0161097701638937,
0.048382941633462906,
-0.007598146330565214,
-0.024985475465655327,
0.05949747934937477,
0.0658901110291481,
-0.03513742983341217,
0.0008843158720992506,
-0.11567969620227814,
0.049390342086553574,
0.03360460326075554,
0.055154237896203995,
0.026383694261312485,
0.053694359958171844,
0.038932498544454575,
0.0004393816343508661,
0.0180604699999094,
-0.09288253635168076,
-0.004073987249284983,
-0.0008234609267674387,
-0.04883106052875519,
-0.006677441764622927,
-0.023541681468486786,
-0.03813307359814644,
0.05245159938931465,
-0.042493823915719986,
-0.055899728089571,
0.08681583404541016,
-0.04896170645952225,
-0.08339672535657883,
-0.0457635223865509,
0.029042238369584084,
0.03465776517987251,
-0.08649188280105591,
0.4062184691429138,
0.03594949096441269,
0.018697189167141914,
0.0979783833026886,
-0.007865204475820065,
0.023714108392596245,
-0.05756505951285362,
-0.06109985336661339,
-0.006620500702410936,
0.007060033269226551,
0.021669859066605568,
-0.024405108764767647,
-0.033514637500047684,
0.00025015627034008503,
0.03170765936374664,
0.04407161846756935,
0.09463243186473846,
-0.035580113530159,
-0.0045343064703047276,
0.043714847415685654,
0.00020504710846580565,
-0.002858717693015933,
-0.024884076789021492,
0.0037606365513056517,
0.014041258953511715,
0.07781578600406647,
-0.1323145031929016,
0.0068764761090278625,
-7.2201250750405e-33,
0.007334581576287746,
0.002726183971390128,
0.012147537432610989,
-0.002440247917547822,
0.027932560071349144,
0.03927065059542656,
0.003743888111785054,
-0.04643532633781433,
-0.014492551796138287,
0.05360198765993118,
0.006590632256120443,
0.03664784133434296,
-0.023135676980018616,
0.03275369852781296,
0.07811082899570465,
0.009627518244087696,
0.007964123040437698,
0.0028742437716573477,
-0.0018807238666340709,
0.004691542126238346,
-0.012402275577187538,
-0.0008041393011808395,
-0.023038707673549652,
0.04297299310564995,
-0.028259985148906708,
-0.06694644689559937,
0.038539037108421326,
-0.07085712999105453,
0.020109260454773903,
0.001460324041545391,
0.0014639950823038816,
0.049912355840206146,
-0.02594558522105217,
0.0008223677286878228,
-0.03757276013493538,
-0.028740663081407547,
0.03337514027953148,
-0.07462829351425171,
-0.035983964800834656,
0.025680823251605034,
-0.050139084458351135,
0.010837196372449398,
-0.04243791848421097,
-0.002668545348569751,
-0.004916265141218901,
0.16647927463054657,
-0.0011541391722857952,
-0.004960660357028246,
-0.06482207775115967,
0.06976216286420822,
-0.0028182310052216053,
-0.02132517658174038,
-0.11613703519105911,
0.04333868995308876,
-0.0033509607892483473,
-0.020106570795178413,
0.016554009169340134,
-0.043971188366413116,
0.020619438961148262,
-0.009089959785342216,
0.009713641367852688,
0.039391469210386276,
-0.012487754225730896,
0.009350251406431198,
-0.08647788316011429,
-0.04851773753762245,
0.02447775937616825,
-0.008494960144162178,
0.023063570261001587,
-0.012638214975595474,
-0.05100997909903526,
0.03675990551710129,
0.03771744668483734,
0.030916057527065277,
-0.028798431158065796,
-0.01926880143582821,
-0.019831717014312744,
0.03583517670631409,
0.08063048869371414,
0.00649732630699873,
0.03545527532696724,
-0.041958946734666824,
0.006693818140774965,
-0.024078864604234695,
0.09502369910478592,
0.054634999483823776,
0.004220988135784864,
-0.05180729925632477,
0.01021517813205719,
-0.041098661720752716,
-0.03574559465050697,
0.06131820008158684,
-0.0030944310128688812,
0.08796171098947525,
0.006000818684697151,
4.4925641867161134e-33,
-0.07716735452413559,
0.01899317093193531,
-0.03573813661932945,
0.0887979194521904,
-0.01755509153008461,
-0.0027626880910247564,
0.037273939698934555,
0.09013677388429642,
-0.09250447154045105,
0.0680299699306488,
0.022390201687812805,
-0.045089662075042725,
0.030878892168402672,
0.044495198875665665,
-0.005799654871225357,
0.03523358702659607,
0.06968843936920166,
-0.004063474480062723,
-0.028155116364359856,
-0.03572935611009598,
-0.030507177114486694,
-0.03237851336598396,
-0.0024998304434120655,
0.034929435700178146,
-0.04148077219724655,
0.030205287039279938,
0.04858911409974098,
0.0632987916469574,
-0.021693143993616104,
0.036800533533096313,
0.03896567225456238,
-0.023581488057971,
-0.05063262954354286,
-0.05820295587182045,
0.04826247692108154,
0.08404397964477539,
0.03678114339709282,
-0.0007768925279378891,
0.024848245084285736,
-0.05051735043525696,
0.039668887853622437,
-0.010082785040140152,
0.002244437113404274,
0.11697717010974884,
-0.021961307153105736,
-0.005805923603475094,
-0.048092879354953766,
0.003788944333791733,
0.035172659903764725,
0.07729728519916534,
-0.09319712221622467,
-0.011992926709353924,
-0.021968109533190727,
0.04129430651664734,
-0.022958293557167053,
0.004160518292337656,
-0.0432187058031559,
0.0702132061123848,
-0.01905948668718338,
0.0004752702370751649,
0.005480603780597448,
0.026761434972286224,
-0.033612821251153946,
0.01346849836409092,
-0.022746674716472626,
0.03873894736170769,
-0.024523282423615456,
-0.03632815554738045,
-0.0017924589337781072,
-0.052569907158613205,
0.006689464673399925,
-0.025846485048532486,
-0.1348353624343872,
0.0011394252069294453,
-0.047169335186481476,
-0.05347497761249542,
-0.018427148461341858,
-0.007304163184016943,
-0.009657083079218864,
-0.037726134061813354,
-0.033999841660261154,
0.01841733604669571,
-0.008003143593668938,
-0.005512353032827377,
-0.03353199362754822,
-0.0201805979013443,
0.021665804088115692,
0.01075822301208973,
-0.05747472122311592,
0.01969684660434723,
-0.007240809965878725,
0.023037107661366463,
0.12023406475782394,
0.0032419958151876926,
0.010150063782930374,
-1.3403668397415913e-8,
-0.046724583953619,
0.04062063992023468,
-0.05561641603708267,
-0.0018853341462090611,
0.056323979049921036,
0.049638908356428146,
-0.04154156893491745,
0.0325038842856884,
0.02574923262000084,
-0.018780937418341637,
0.06920813769102097,
0.02598794549703598,
-0.02782331220805645,
0.05757509544491768,
0.09128093719482422,
-0.01532574463635683,
-0.10472093522548676,
-0.027585938572883606,
-0.016222817823290825,
-0.035399287939071655,
-0.010461363941431046,
-0.013999390415847301,
-0.0002939800324384123,
-0.08362972736358643,
0.007932317443192005,
0.006960071157664061,
-0.04422977939248085,
0.07475824654102325,
0.07440952211618423,
-0.04058071970939636,
-0.0018266832921653986,
0.01985001191496849,
0.014382191933691502,
0.020585300400853157,
0.02213379554450512,
-0.06437048316001892,
-0.06369856745004654,
0.01613914780318737,
0.009907381609082222,
-0.0055595203302800655,
-0.05467313155531883,
-0.0233115516602993,
0.07046928256750107,
0.006468005012720823,
-0.047700025141239166,
-0.0036470729392021894,
0.007837599143385887,
-0.004974569659680128,
-0.01241857185959816,
-0.07781214267015457,
-0.0009409073390997946,
-0.008002524264156818,
0.006034235469996929,
0.08434933423995972,
0.10730371624231339,
0.011427774094045162,
0.013366665691137314,
-0.012747352942824364,
0.061454374343156815,
0.03564131259918213,
0.1587459295988083,
0.12640950083732605,
0.04654904082417488,
-0.015717294067144394
] | {
"pdf_file": "Y3S5ELWZ63OQNZDWBJ5D6HWRVVKUF7LV.pdf",
"text": " "
} |
[
-0.009378724731504917,
0.006413500290364027,
0.0424637608230114,
0.01850030943751335,
0.0709083303809166,
-0.007781777065247297,
-0.02338821068406105,
0.03320782259106636,
-0.07118041813373566,
0.11851107329130173,
0.02015007473528385,
-0.05347160995006561,
0.013936283066868782,
0.0634726732969284,
-0.10203304886817932,
-0.03849608451128006,
-0.04635858163237572,
-0.08573311567306519,
-0.022648528218269348,
0.03212352097034454,
0.10351784527301788,
0.10372511297464371,
-0.01848524622619152,
-0.03518989309668541,
-0.006235501263290644,
0.03547455370426178,
-0.06183041259646416,
0.11481180787086487,
-0.018325064331293106,
-0.11569787561893463,
-0.005068816710263491,
0.07387910783290863,
0.010824587196111679,
-0.013769787736237049,
0.06943807005882263,
-0.024454651400446892,
0.030193543061614037,
-0.037597257643938065,
0.05962277948856354,
0.04671904817223549,
-0.08637313544750214,
0.006494816858321428,
0.0645180344581604,
0.022040624171495438,
-0.06822238117456436,
0.012199552729725838,
-0.05788276344537735,
-0.09705062955617905,
0.024917373433709145,
0.023883813992142677,
0.031242061406373978,
-0.027380445972085,
0.05674979090690613,
0.04691231995820999,
-0.0068429941311478615,
-0.06839242577552795,
-0.011066949926316738,
-0.0716010257601738,
-0.038341864943504333,
-0.06443087756633759,
-0.0020725224167108536,
0.025708304718136787,
0.021932028234004974,
-0.0676470696926117,
0.06982646882534027,
-0.07272090762853622,
-0.06971372663974762,
-0.0062550329603254795,
0.0637921616435051,
-0.03703164681792259,
-0.0866096019744873,
0.010941960848867893,
-0.014955678023397923,
-0.07679601013660431,
0.02394700236618519,
0.06426314264535904,
0.03740911930799484,
0.03937891498208046,
-0.0029260257724672556,
-0.1530901938676834,
0.006852693390101194,
0.05099036172032356,
0.035374391824007034,
-0.0027217713650316,
-0.004771064501255751,
-0.05720881000161171,
-0.015012968331575394,
0.04304645210504532,
0.07617924362421036,
-0.07569290697574615,
0.06474439054727554,
0.0810173749923706,
0.05771815776824951,
-0.056596070528030396,
0.04059372469782829,
-0.015930958092212677,
-0.02493717521429062,
0.031200015917420387,
0.07315997034311295,
0.06125720962882042,
0.021073399111628532,
0.0395796112716198,
-0.05370168760418892,
-0.039144497364759445,
0.02040095627307892,
-0.09109305590391159,
-0.027219194918870926,
0.11180012673139572,
-0.025204604491591454,
-0.04072537273168564,
0.0673162192106247,
0.03833147883415222,
-0.0005972819053567946,
0.01521659642457962,
0.09354712814092636,
0.019886601716279984,
-0.010473990812897682,
-0.039808548986911774,
-0.08286166191101074,
0.0345604382455349,
0.039936602115631104,
-0.02576655149459839,
0.00004279298082110472,
0.03528305143117905,
-0.0029667711351066828,
0.06678082048892975,
0.04669410362839699,
8.376322216726102e-33,
-0.009695821441709995,
0.009651212021708488,
-0.044247496873140335,
-0.0042133331298828125,
0.02179882489144802,
-0.09345636516809464,
0.004337257239967585,
-0.018520349636673927,
0.025103963911533356,
0.01904921978712082,
-0.04111603647470474,
0.016869500279426575,
-0.07875087857246399,
-0.036057110875844955,
0.00005427582800621167,
-0.10267715156078339,
0.008441784419119358,
0.048118941485881805,
-0.06547867506742477,
0.004694755654782057,
0.03334072232246399,
-0.04459740221500397,
-0.014285449869930744,
-0.05590790882706642,
0.12894949316978455,
0.06424558907747269,
0.014964195899665356,
0.047623127698898315,
-0.057341333478689194,
-0.017296208068728447,
0.07973315566778183,
0.008324841968715191,
-0.0615130215883255,
-0.012503641657531261,
-0.014033261686563492,
-0.017108090221881866,
-0.05696338042616844,
-0.00722855981439352,
-0.023988336324691772,
-0.023592781275510788,
0.03003929741680622,
-0.003866402432322502,
-0.0012379912659525871,
0.06500677019357681,
0.07314896583557129,
-0.009933613240718842,
0.031870950013399124,
0.060029760003089905,
0.07764752954244614,
0.0035700416192412376,
-0.034581560641527176,
0.03763299435377121,
-0.05746686831116676,
-0.03770187124609947,
-0.042690765112638474,
-0.05378720909357071,
0.06826847046613693,
-0.06825853884220123,
-0.014571350067853928,
-0.00865880772471428,
0.04123533517122269,
0.013161543756723404,
-0.10852448642253876,
0.0029929953161627054,
-0.003949254285544157,
0.011962074786424637,
0.062337953597307205,
-0.04103364422917366,
0.09513822942972183,
0.03562420979142189,
-0.05897177755832672,
-0.09236486256122589,
0.05610950291156769,
0.03429260477423668,
0.0024707720149308443,
-0.04516743868589401,
0.011598726734519005,
0.058462873101234436,
-0.028433477506041527,
0.004592261277139187,
-0.06879815459251404,
0.03871120512485504,
-0.050923969596624374,
0.00029268290381878614,
0.006007252726703882,
-0.10414319485425949,
0.04047602787613869,
0.028367282822728157,
-0.050285208970308304,
-0.08973156660795212,
0.030139431357383728,
0.031528085470199585,
-0.03807475417852402,
0.01582283340394497,
0.00729061383754015,
-7.19622139741653e-33,
0.003675037296488881,
0.02338588424026966,
0.0148613965138793,
-0.0022434282582253218,
-0.049299389123916626,
-0.023219561204314232,
-0.04403848573565483,
-0.009469804354012012,
0.07035782933235168,
-0.01020603347569704,
0.06908030807971954,
-0.012664733454585075,
0.009004710242152214,
0.02359098009765148,
-0.04192938283085823,
0.016574105247855186,
-0.02550389990210533,
-0.009759980253875256,
-0.03459513932466507,
0.023792680352926254,
-0.019642040133476257,
0.07342898845672607,
-0.026346102356910706,
-0.018112128600478172,
-0.022332768887281418,
0.037676386535167694,
-0.013009387068450451,
-0.01875876821577549,
0.028326939791440964,
-0.04985357075929642,
-0.10552498698234558,
-0.12032617628574371,
-0.039227597415447235,
0.11342539638280869,
-0.05145690590143204,
-0.13654407858848572,
0.04292715713381767,
0.007443732116371393,
-0.07119032740592957,
0.04637952148914337,
0.03371651843190193,
0.024366725236177444,
0.017431680113077164,
0.033175401389598846,
-0.03904493525624275,
-0.0273046363145113,
0.0851837694644928,
-0.049931395798921585,
0.029313430190086365,
-0.003005466191098094,
0.04604949429631233,
-0.036132730543613434,
0.013176970183849335,
-0.04429545998573303,
0.026351433247327805,
0.10308525711297989,
0.09366001933813095,
-0.04707914963364601,
-0.03400752320885658,
-0.01535829622298479,
0.0834292471408844,
0.09538065642118454,
-0.012391866184771061,
0.016446011140942574,
-0.0024883707519620657,
-0.025037093088030815,
-0.037101369351148605,
-0.06944602727890015,
0.024847107008099556,
-0.06690751016139984,
-0.018006274476647377,
-0.015040196478366852,
0.03518909215927124,
-0.08997799456119537,
0.06840142607688904,
-0.09302154183387756,
-0.04887229949235916,
-0.031040167436003685,
-0.06902781128883362,
-0.06386300921440125,
-0.07013676315546036,
0.011276454664766788,
-0.025192487984895706,
0.0650712326169014,
0.03751136362552643,
0.05581730976700783,
0.009392183274030685,
0.0009061250602826476,
0.04182131588459015,
0.031516581773757935,
-0.06911510974168777,
0.0029376023449003696,
-0.0279119610786438,
0.0718226358294487,
-0.039110928773880005,
-5.521496149185623e-8,
-0.003527879249304533,
0.024866240099072456,
-0.030173273757100105,
0.00550111522898078,
0.11149835586547852,
-0.021335812285542488,
0.009058468975126743,
0.027445288375020027,
-0.01678505726158619,
0.01901799812912941,
0.06254351139068604,
0.0638120099902153,
0.021074950695037842,
-0.050137367099523544,
-0.02649829164147377,
-0.036780133843421936,
0.0042120167054235935,
-0.014557096175849438,
-0.04550421983003616,
-0.044177133589982986,
-0.03599497303366661,
-0.03389354050159454,
0.04682488366961479,
0.03851272910833359,
0.000229815996135585,
0.0060995519161224365,
-0.02498229779303074,
0.12819601595401764,
-0.02551998384296894,
0.02332436293363571,
0.0972643718123436,
0.03019346110522747,
-0.005621278192847967,
0.053269725292921066,
-0.011297308839857578,
0.034959789365530014,
0.038744375109672546,
0.043872978538274765,
0.011456947773694992,
0.0780443623661995,
-0.028777634724974632,
0.01570434682071209,
-0.07027019560337067,
0.06979537755250931,
0.05124624818563461,
-0.0065147713758051395,
-0.12067217379808426,
-0.09036776423454285,
0.057925451546907425,
-0.07975178956985474,
0.03146400302648544,
-0.018588682636618614,
0.027822427451610565,
0.08578172326087952,
0.06023625284433365,
0.03696490451693535,
0.007970986887812614,
-0.03031296096742153,
0.027324901893734932,
0.06745538115501404,
0.11102141439914703,
-0.0018111817771568894,
0.014574859291315079,
-0.0479121096432209
] | {
"pdf_file": "SECTG7BZB6D4FVDAZNN2DTF2GGCAMTXE.pdf",
"text": "WA7 89000 8967, Change Control Log\nHanford Federal Facility RCRA Permit Dangerous Waste Portion\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nChange Control Log\nChange Control Logs ensure that changes to this unit are performed in a methodical, controlled, coordinated\nand transparent manner. Each unit addendum will have a \"Last Modification Date\" which represents the last\ndate the portion of the unit has been modified. The \"Modification Number\" represents Ecology's method for\ntracking the different versions of the permit. This log will serve as an up to date record of modifications and\nversion history of the unit.\nLast modification to Integrated Disposal Facility September 30, 2015\nChapters Last Modification Date Modification Number\nConditions 09/30/2015 8c.2015.Q3\n1.0 Part A Form 10/01/2008\n2.0 Topographic Map Description 09/30/2014\n3.0 Waste Analysis Plan 06/30/2013\n4.0 Process Information 12/31/2008\n4A1 Phase I Critical Systems Design Report 03/31/2008\n4A2 Critical Systems Tables & Data Sheets 03/31/2008\n4A3 Critical Systems Design Drawings 03/31/2008\n4B Detailed Design Cell 1 Construction Quality 04/09/2006\nAssurance Plan\n4C Facility Response Action Plan 04/09/2006\n4D Construction Specifications (C-1) 12/31/2006\n5.0 Groundwater Monitoring 06/30/2010\n6.0 Procedures to Prevent Hazards 06/20/2013\n7.0 Reserved\n8.0 Personnel Training 09/30/2014\n9.0 Reserved\n10.0 Reserved\n11.0 Closure Plan 09/30/2014\n12.0 Reserved\n13.0 Other Federal and State Laws 04/09/2006\nAddendum J.1 Pre-Active Life Contingency 06/30/2012\nPlan (OUO)\nAddendum J.2 Active Life Contingency Plan 06/30/2012\n(OUO)\nChange Control Log Integrated Disposal Facility 8C.2015.Q3\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI\n2 PART III, OPERATING UNIT 11 UNIT-SPECIFIC CONDITIONS\n3 INTEGRATED DISPOSAL FACILITY\n4\n5\nConditions. 1\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nConditions.2\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2 PART III, OPERATING UNIT 11 UNIT-SPECIFIC CONDITIONS\n3 INTEGRATED DISPOSAL FACILITY\n4 This document sets forth the operating conditions for the Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF).\n5 III.11.A COMPLIANCE WITH APPROVED PERMIT\n6 The Permittees shall comply with all requirements set forth in the Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF)\n7 Permit conditions, the Chapters and Appendices specified in Permit Condition 111.11 .A and the\n8 Amendments specified in Permit Conditions 111.11.B through 111.11.1. All subsections, figures, and tables\n9 included in these portions are enforceable unless stated otherwise:\n10 OPERATING UNIT 11:\n11 Chapter 1.0 Part A Form, dated October 1, 2008\n12 Chapter 2.0 Topographic Map Description, dated September 30, 2014\n13 Chapter 3.0 Waste Analysis Plan, dated June 30, 2013\n14 Chapter 4.0 Process Information, dated December 31, 2008\n15 Appendix 4A Design Report (as applicable to critical systems), dated March 31, 2008\n16 Appendix 4B Construction Quality Assurance Plan, dated April 9, 2006\n17 Appendix 4C Response Action Plan, dated April 9, 2006\n18 Appendix 4D Construction Specifications (RPP-18489, Rev. 1), dated December 31, 2006\n19 Chapter 5.0 Ground Water Monitoring, dated June 30, 2010\n20 Chapter 6.0 Procedure to Prevent Hazards, dated June 20, 2013\n21 Addendum J.1 Contingency Plan -Pre-Active Life, dated June 30, 2012\n22 Addendum J.2 Contingency Plan -Active Life, dated June 30, 2012\n23 Chapter 8.0 Personnel Training, dated September 30, 2014\n24 Chapter 11.0 Closure, dated September 30, 2014\n25 Chapter 13.0 Other Federal and State Laws, dated April 9, 2006\n26 General and Standard Hanford Facility RCRA Permit, WA7 89000 8967 (Permit) conditions (Part I and\n27 Part 1D Conditions) applicable to the IDc are identified in Permit Attachment 9 (Permit Applicability\n28 Matrix).\n29 111.11.13 AMENDMENTS TO THE APPROVED PERMIT\n30 111.11.1C.1 Portions of Permit Attachment 4, Hanford Emergency Management Plan that are not\n31 made enforceable by inclusion in the applicability matrix for that document, are not made\n32 enforceable by reference in this document.\n33 111.11.3.2 Permittees must comply with all applicable portions of the Permit. The facility and unit-\n34 specific recordkeeping requirements are distinguished in the General Information Portion\n35 of the Permit, and are tied to the Permit conditions.\n36 111.11.3.3 The scope of this Permit is restricted to the landfill construction and operation as\n37 necessary to dispose of: 1) immobilized low activity waste from the WP, and 2) the\n38 Demonstration Bulk Vitrification System and ID operational waste as identified in\n39 Chapter 4.0. Future expansion of the RCRA trench, or disposal of other wastes not\n40 specified in this Permit, is prohibited unless authorized via modification of this Permit.\nConditions.3\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 III.11.B.4 In accordance with WAC 173-303-806(1 1)(d), this Permit shall be reviewed every five\n2 (5) years after the effective date and modified, as necessary, in accordance with\n3 WAC 173-303-830(3).\n4 111.11.B.5 Inspection Requirements -Pre-Active Life Period and Active Life Period\n5 111.11 .B.5.a The Permittees will conduct inspections of the IDF according to the following\n6 requirements:\n7 III.11.B.5.a.i Prior to the start of the active life of the IDF as defined in WAC 173-303-040, according\n8 to Chapter 6.0, Table 6.2.\n9 III.11.B.5.a.ii Following the start of the active life of the IDF as defined in WAC 173-303-040,\n10 according to Chapter 6.0, Table 6.2A.\n11 I111.11.B.5.b The Permittees will remedy any problems revealed by inspections conducted pursuant to\n12 permit condition 111.1 1.B.5.a on a schedule, which prevents hazards to the public health\n13 and the environment and as agreed to in writing, by Ecology. Where a hazard is\n14 imminent or has already occurred, remedial action must be taken immediately.\n15 III.11.B.5.c Reserved\n16 111.11.B.5.d Rainwater Management\n17 Ill.11.B.5.e Prior to the start of the active life of the IDF, the Permittees will manage the discharge of\n18 such water in accordance with the pollution prevention and best management practices\n19 required by State Waste Discharge Permit Number ST 4511.\n20 III.11.B.5.e.i Management of Liquids Collected in the Leachate Collection and Removal System\n21 (LCRS), Leak Detection System (LDS), and Secondary Leak Detection System (SLDS)\n22 prior to the start of the active life of the IDF.\n23 III.11.B.5e.ii Permittees shall manage the liquid in the LCRS system in a manner that does not allow\n24 the fluid head to exceed 30.5 cm above the flat 50-foot by 50-foot LCRS sump HDPE\n25 bottom liner, and the LCRS sump trough, except for storms that exceed the 25-year,\n26 24-hour storm event [(WAC 173-303-665(2)(h)(ii)(B). Liquid with a depth greater than\n27 30.5 cm above the LCRS liner will be removed at the earliest practicable time after\n28 detection (not to exceed 5 working days).\n29 Ill.11.B.5.e.iii Accumulated liquid of pumpable quantities in the LDS and SLDS will be managed in a\n30 manner that does not allow the fluid head to exceed 30.5 cm above the LDS liner or\n31 SLDS liner [WAC 173-303-665(2)(h)(i)(C)(iii)]. Liquid with a depth greater than 30.5\n32 cm above a liner will be removed at the earliest practicable time after detection (not to\n33 exceed 5 working days).\n34 III.11.B.5.e.iv The Permittees will use a flow meter to check if the amount of actual liquid pumped\n35 corresponds to the amount accumulated in the leachate collection tank to verify the\n36 proper function of the leachate collection and removal sump pumps with each use. The\n37 Permittees will document in the IDF portion of the facility operating record appropriate\n38 quality assurance/quality control requirements for selection and operation of the flow\n39 meter based on the required verification. In addition, the Permittees will evaluate the\n40 leachate transfer lines for freeze and thaw damage when ambient conditions may cause\n41 such damage to occur. The Permittees will document the methods and criteria used for\n42 purposes of this evaluation, along with an appropriate justification.\n43 III.11.B.5.e.v The Permittee will inspect for liquids after significant rainfall events.\n44 111.11 .B.5.e.vi The Permittee will annually verify monitoring gauges and instruments are in current\n45 calibration; calibration will be performed annually or more frequently at intervals\n46 suggested by the manufacturer (refer to Chapter 4.0, §4.3.7.4)\nConditions.4\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 111.11 .B.5.f The Permittees will monitor liquids in the Leachate Collection and Removal System and\n2 Leak Detection System to ensure the action leakage rate (Chapter 4.0, Appendix 4A) is\n3 not exceeded.\n4 111.11.B.5.g Soil Stabilization\n5 Prior to the first placement of waste in the IDF, the Permittee will apply soil stabilization\n6 materials as needed to prevent soil erosion in and around the landfill.\n7 1II.11.C Design Requirements\n8 III.11.C.1 IDF is designed in accordance with WAC 173-303-665 and WAC 173-303-640 as\n9 described in Chapter 4.0. Design changes impacting IDF critical systems shall be\n10 performed in accordance with Permit Conditions 111.11 .D. I.d.i and III. 11 .D. I.d.ii.\n11 111.11.C.1.a IDF Critical Systems include the following: The leachate collection and removal system\n12 (LCRS), leachate collection tank (LCT), leak detection system (LDS), liner system (LS),\n13 and closure cap. H-2 Drawings for the LCRS, LCT, LDS, and LS are identified in\n14 Appendix 4A, Section 3 of this Permit. Drawings for the closure cap will be provided\n15 pursuant to Permit Condition III.11.C.1.c.\n16 The Permittees shall construct and operate the IDF in accordance with all specifications\n17 contained in RPP-18489 Rev 0. Critical systems, as defined in the definitions section of\n18 the Site-Wide RCRA Permit, are identified in Appendix 4A, Section 1 of this Permit.\n19 III.11.C.1.b Landfill Cap\n20 At final closure of the landfill, the Permittees shall cover the landfill with a final cover\n21 (closure cap) designed and constructed [WAC 173-303-665(6), WAC 173-303-806(4)(h)]\n22 to: Provide long-term minimization of migration of liquids through the closed landfill;\n23 Function with minimum maintenance; Promote drainage and minimize erosion or\n24 abrasion of the cover; Accommodate settling and subsidence so that the cover's integrity\n25 is maintained; and have a permeability less than or equal to the permeability of any\n26 bottom liner system or natural sub soils present.\n27 111.11.C.1.c Compliance Schedule\n28 Proposed conceptualized final cover design is presented in Chapter 11, Closure\n29 Requirements. Six months prior to start of construction of IDF landfill final cover (but\n30 no later than 6 months prior to acceptance of the last shipment of waste at the IDF), the\n31 Permittees shall submit IDF landfill final cover design, specifications and Construction\n32 Quality Assurance (CQA) plan to Ecology for review and approval. No construction of\n33 the final cover may proceed until Ecology approval of the final design is given, through a\n34 permit modification.\n35 111.11.C.1.d The Permittees shall notify Ecology at least sixty (60) calendar days prior to the date it\n36 expects to begin closure of the IDF landfill in accordance with WAC 173-303-610(c).\n37 III.11.C.2 Design Reports\n38 111.1 1.C.2.a New Tank Design Assessment Report\n39 Permittees shall generate a written report in accordance with WAC 173-303-640(3)(a),\n40 providing the results of the leachate collection tank system design assessment. The report\n41 shall be reviewed and certified by an Independent Qualified Registered Professional\n42 Engineer (IQRPE)' in accordance with WAC-173-303-810(13)(a).\n\"Independent qualified registered professional engineer,\" as used here and elsewhere with respect to Operating Unit 11, means\na person who is licensed by the state of Washington, or a state which has reciprocity with the state of Washington as defined in\nConditions.5\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 111.11.C.2.b Compliance Schedule\n2 Permittees shall submit the leachate collection tank design assessment report to Ecology\n3 along with the IQRPE certification, prior to construction of any part of the tank system\n4 including ancillary equipment.\n5 III.11.D CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS\n6 111.11 .D.1 Construction Quality Assurance\n7 III.11.D.1.a Ecology shall provide field oversight during construction of critical systems. In cases\n8 where an Engineering Change Notice (ECN) and/or Non Conformance Report (NCR) are\n9 required, Ecology and the Permittees shall follow steps for processing changes to the\n10 approved design per Permit Conditions 111.1 l.D.1.d.i and 111.1 l.D.l.d.ii.\n11 111.11 .D.1.b Permittees shall implement the CQA plan (Appendix 4B of the permit) during\n12 construction of IDF.\n13 III.11.D.1.b.i The Permittees will not receive waste in the IDF until the owner or operator has\n14 submitted to Ecology by certified mail or hand delivery a certification signed by the CQA\n15 officer that the approved CQA plan has been successfully carried out and that the unit\n16 meets the requirements of WAC 173-303-665(2)(h) or (j); and the procedure in\n17 WAC 173-303-810(14)(a) has been completed. Documentation supporting the CQA\n18 officer's certification shall be furnished to Ecology upon request.\n19 III.11.D.1.c Construction inspection reports\n20 Permittees shall submit a report documenting the results of the leachate tank installation\n21 inspection. This report must be prepared by an independent, qualified installation\n22 inspector or a professional independent, qualified, registered, professional engineer either\n23 of whom is trained and experienced in the proper installation of tank systems or\n24 components. The Permittees will remedy all discrepancies before the tank system is\n25 placed in use. This report shall be submitted to Ecology 90 days prior to IDF operation\n26 and be included in the IDF Operating Record. [WAC 173-303-640(3)(h)].\n27 111.11.D.1.d ECN/NCR Process for Critical Systems\n28 Portions of the following conditions for processing engineering change notices and\n29 non-conformance reporting were extracted from and supersede Site Wide General Permit\n30 Condition II.L.\n31 III.11.D.1.d.i Engineering Change Notice for Critical Systems\n32 During construction of the IDF, the Permittees shall formally document changes to the\n33 approved designs, plans, and specifications, identified in Appendices 4A, 4B, 4C, and 4D\n34 of this permit, with an Engineering Change Notice (ECN).\n35 The Permittees shall maintain all ECNs in the IDF unit-specific Operating Record and\n36 shall make them available to Ecology upon request or during the course of an inspection.\n37 The Permittees shall provide to Ecology copies of proposed ECNs affecting any critical\n38 system within five (5) working days of initiating the ECN. Identification of critical\n39 systems is included in Permit Condition 111.1 1.C.1 and Appendix 4A of this permit.\n40 Within five (5) working days, Ecology will review a proposed ECN modifying a critical\n41 system and inform the Permittees whether the proposed ECN, when issued, will require a\n42 Class 1, 2, or 3 Permit modification.\nRCW 18.43.100, and who is not an employee of the owner or operator of the facility for which construction or modification\ncertification is required. A qualified professional engineer is an engineer with expertise in the specific area for which a\ncertification is given.\nConditions.6\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 111.11.D.1.d.ii Non-conformance Reporting for Critical Systems\n2 111.11.D.1.d.ii.a During construction of the IDF, the Permittees shall formally document with a\n3 Nonconformance Report (NCR), any work completed which does not meet or exceed the\n4 standards of the approved design, plans and specifications, identified in Appendices 4A,\n5 4B, 4C and 4D of this Permit. The Permittees shall maintain all NCRs in the IDF unit-\n6 specific Operating Record and shall make them available to Ecology upon request, or\n7 during the course of an inspection.\n8 III.11.D.1.d.iib The Permittees shall provide copies of NCRs affecting any critical or regulated\n9 system to Ecology within five (5) working days after identification of the\n10 nonconformance. Identification of critical systems is included in Permit\n11 Condition 111.11 .C. 1 and Appendix 4A of this permit. Ecology will review a NCR\n12 affecting a critical system and notify the Permittees within five (5) working days, in\n13 writing, whether a Permit modification is required for any nonconformance, and whether\n14 prior approval is required from Ecology before work proceeds, which affects the\n15 nonconforming item.\n16 III.11.D.1.d.iLc As-Built Drawings\n17 Upon completing construction of IDF, the Permittees shall produce as-built drawings of\n18 the project, which incorporate the design and construction modifications resulting from\n19 all project ECNs and NCRs, as well as modifications made pursuant to\n20 WAC 173-303-830. The Permittees shall place the drawings into the Operating Record\n21 within twelve (12) months of completing construction.\n22 111.11 .D.2 The Permittees shall not reduce the minimum frequency of destructive testing less than\n23 one test per 500 feet of seam, without prior approval in writing from Ecology\n24 III.11.E GROUND WATER AND GROUND WATER MONITORING\n25 Ground water shall be monitored in accordance with WAC 173-303 and the provisions\n26 contained in the Ecology-approved facility ground water monitoring plan (Chapter 5.0).\n27 All wells used to monitor the ground water beneath the unit shall be constructed in\n28 accordance with the provisions of WAC 173-160.\n29 111.11 .E.1 Ground Water Monitoring Program\n30 111.11.E.1.a Prior to initial waste placement in the IDF landfill, the Permittees shall sample all ground\n31 water monitoring wells in the IDF network twice quarterly for one first year to determine\n32 baseline conditions. For the first sampling event (and only the first), samples for each\n33 well will include all constituents in 40 CFR 264 Appendix IX. Thereafter, sampling will\n34 include only those constituents as specified in Chapter 5.0, Table 5-2: chromium (filtered\n35 and unfiltered the first year to compare results), specific conductance, TOC, TOX, and\n36 pH. Other constituents to be monitored but not statistically compared include alkalinity,\n37 anions, ICP metals, and turbidity. These will provide important information on\n38 hydrogeologic characteristics of the aquifer and may provide indications of encroaching\n39 contaminants from other facilities not associated with IDF.\n40 111.11 .E.1.b After the baseline monitoring is completed, and data is analyzed, the Permittees and\n41 Ecology shall assess revisions to Chapter 5.0, Table 5-2. Subsequent samples will be\n42 collected annually and will include constituents listed in Table 5-2 as approved by\n43 Ecology. All data analysis will employ Ecology approved statistical methods pursuant to\n44 WAC 173-303-645. Changes to Chapter 5.0 will be subject to the permit modification\n45 procedures under WAC 173-303-830.\n46 III.11.E.1.c All constituents used as tracers to assess performance of the facility through computer\n47 modeling should be sampled at least annually to validate modeling results.\nConditions.7\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Groundwater monitoring data and analytes to be monitored will be reviewed periodically\n2 as defined in Chapter 5.0 of this Permit.\n3 111.11.E.1.d Upon Ecology approval of the leachate monitoring plan, leachate monitoring and\n4 groundwater monitoring activities should be coordinated as approved by Ecology to form\n5 an effective and efficient means of monitoring the performance of the IDF facility.\n6 111.11.E.1.e Groundwater monitoring data shall be reported to Ecology annually by July 31. The\n7 annual report shall include monitoring results for the 12-month period from January 1\n8 through December 31.\n9 III.11.F LEACHATE COLLECTION COMPONENT MANAGEMENT\n10 Permittees shall design, construct, and operate all leachate collection systems to minimize\n11 clogging during the active life and post closure period\n12 111.11.F.1 Leachate Collection and Removal System (LCRS)\n13 III.11.F.1.a At least 120 days prior to initial waste placement in the IDF, the Permittees shall submit a\n14 Leachate monitoring plan to Ecology for review, approval, and incorporation into the\n15 permit. Upon approval by Ecology, this plan will be incorporated into the Permit as a\n16 class 1' modification. The Permittees shall not accept waste into the IDF until the\n17 requirements of the leachate monitoring plan have been incorporated into this permit.\n18 111.11.F.1.b Leachate in the LCRS (primary sump) shall be sampled and analyzed monthly for the\n19 first year of operation of the facility and quarterly thereafter (pursuant to\n20 WAC 173-303-200). Additionally, leachate shall be sampled and analyzed to meet waste\n21 acceptance criteria at the receiving treatment storage and disposal facility.\n22 111.11 .F.1.c Permittees shall manage the leachate in the LCRS system in a manner that does not allow\n23 the fluid head to exceed 30.5 cm above the flat 50-foot by 50-foot LCRS sump HDPE\n24 bottom liner except for rare storm events as discussed in Chapter 4.0, §4.3.6.1 and the\n25 LCRS sump trough (WAC 173-303-665(2)(h)(ii)(B). Liquid with a depth greater than\n26 30.5 cm above the SLDS liner will be removed at the earliest practicable time after\n27 detection (not to exceed 5 working days).\n28 111.11 .F.1.d After initial waste placement, Permittees shall manage all leachate from the permitted\n29 cell as dangerous waste (designated with Dangerous Waste Number F039) in accordance\n30 with WAC 173-303.\n31 111.11.F.2 Monitoring and Management of Leak Detection System (LDS/secondary sump)\n32 111.11.F.2.a Permittees shall manage the leachate in the LDS system in a manner that does not allow\n33 the fluid head to exceed 30.5 cm above the LDS liner (WAC 173-303-665(2)(h)(ii)(B).\n34 III.11.F.2.b Permittees shall monitor and record leachate removal for comparison to the Action\n35 Leakage Rate (ALR) as described in Appendix 4C, Response Action Plan. If the leachate\n36 flow rate in the LDS exceeds the ALR, the Permittees shall implement the Ecology\n37 approved response action plan (Appendix 4C).\n38 111.11 .F.2.c Leachate from the LDS (secondary sump) shall be sampled semi-annually if a pumpable\n39 quantity of leachate is available for sampling.\n40 111.11.F.2.d Accumulated liquid of pumpable quantities in the LDS will be managed in a manner that\n41 does not allow the fluid head to exceed 30.5 cm above the LDS liner\n42 [WAC 173-303-665(2)(h)(i)(C)(iii)].\nConditions.8\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Liquid with a depth greater than 30.5 cm above the LDS liner will be removed at the\n2 earliest practicable time after detection (not to exceed 5 working days).\n3 111.11.F.3 Monitoring and Management of the Secondary Leak Detection System (SLDS)\n4 III.11.F.3.a At least 180 days prior to initial waste placement, the, the Permittees shall submit to\n5 Ecology for approval a sub-surface liquids monitoring and operations plan (SLMOP) for\n6 the SLDS to include the following: monitoring frequency, pressure transducer\n7 configuration, liquid collection and storage processes, sampling and analysis and\n8 response actions. The SLMOP shall be approved by Ecology prior to placement of waste\n9 in the IDF, and incorporated into the Permit as a Class 1' modification.\n10 1I.11.F.3.b Permittees shall monitor and manage the SLDS (tertiary sump) pursuant to the approved\n11 sub-surface liquids monitoring and operations plan.\n12 Ill.11.F.3.c Accumulated liquid of pumpable quantities in the SLDS will be managed in a manner\n13 that does not allow the fluid head to exceed 30.5 cm above the SLDS liner\n14 [WAC 173-303-665(2)(h)(i)(C)(iii)]. Liquid with a depth greater than 30.5 cm above the\n15 SLDS liner will be removed at the earliest practicable time after detection (not to exceed\n16 5 working days).\n17 Ill.11.F.3.d After initial waste placement, Permittees shall manage all leachate from the permitted\n18 cell as dangerous waste in accordance with WAC 173-303.\n19 III.11.G CONSTRUCTION WATER MANAGEMENT\n20 III.11.G.1 During construction, it is anticipated that liquids will accumulate on top of all liners and\n21 sumps. Permittees shall manage the construction wastewater in accordance with State\n22 Waste Discharge Permit ST 4511.\n23 111.11.G.2 Liquid accumulation within the LCRS, LDS, and SLDS prior to initial waste placement\n24 will be considered construction wastewater (i.e., not leachate).\n25 III.11.H LANDFILL LINER INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT & LANDFILL OPERATIONS\n26 111.11.H.1 Permittees shall design, construct, and operate the landfill in a manner to protect the\n27 liners from becoming damaged. Temperature: Waste packages with elevated\n28 temperatures shall be evaluated and managed in a manner to maintain the primary (upper)\n29 liner below the design basis temperature for the liner (e.g.,160 F). Weight: Waste, fill\n30 material and closure cover shall be placed in a manner that does not exceed the allowable\n31 load bearing capacity of the liner (weight per area 13,000 lb/ft2). Puncture: At least\n32 3 feet of clean backfill material shall be placed as an operations layer over the leachate\n33 collection and removal system to protect the system from puncture damage.\n34 111.11 .H.1.a All equipment used for construction and operations inside of the IDF shall meet the\n35 weight limitation as specified in Permit Condition III. 11 .H. 1. Only equipment that can\n36 be adequately supported by the operations layer as specified in Permit\n37 Condition 111.11 .H. I (e.g., will not have the potential to puncture the liner) shall be used\n38 inside of the IDF. All equipment used for construction and operations outside of the IDF\n39 shall not damage the berms. Changes to any equipment will follow the process\n40 established by condition II.R of the site wide permit. Within 120 days from the effective\n41 date for the permit, a process for demonstrating compliance with this condition shall be\n42 submitted for review by Ecology. This process will be incorporated into appropriate IDF\n43 operating procedures prior to IDF operations.\n44 111.11.H.2 The Permittees shall construct berms and ditches to prevent run-on and run-off in\n45 accordance with the requirements of Chapter 4, Section 4.3.8 of the IDF portion of this\n46 permit.\n47\nConditions.9\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Before the first placement of waste in the IDF, the Permittees shall submit to Ecology a\n2 final grading and topographical map on a scale sufficient to identify berms and ditches\n3 used to control run-on and run-off. Upon approval, Ecology will incorporate these maps\n4 into the permit as a Class 1' modification.\n5 111.11.H.3 The Permittees shall operate the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) IDF\n6 Cell (Celll) in accordance with WAC 173-303-665(2) and the operating practices\n7 described in Chapters 3.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, Addendum J.1, Addendum J.2, and\n8 Appendix 4A, § l, subsection 7, except as otherwise specified in this Permit.\n9 111.11 .H.4 The Permittees shall maintain a permanent and accurate record of the three-dimensional\n10 location of each waste type, based on grid coordinates, within the RCRA IDF Cell (Cell l)\n11 in accordance with WAC 173-303-665(5).\n12 111.11.1 WASTE ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA\n13 The only acceptable waste form approved for disposal at the RCRA cell of IDF are IDF\n14 operational waste, Immobilized Low Activity Waste (ILAW) in glass form from the\n15 Waste Treatment Plant (WTP) Low Activity Waste (LAW) Vitrification facility and\n16 ILAW from the Bulk Vitrification Research Demonstration and Development facility\n17 (up to 50 boxes). Specifics about waste acceptance criteria for each of these wastes are\n18 detailed below.\n19 No other waste forms may be disposed at the RCRA cell of IDF unless authorized via a\n20 Final Permit modification decision. Requests for Permit modifications must be\n21 accompanied by an analysis adequate for Ecology to comply with SEPA, as well as by a\n22 risk assessment and groundwater modeling to show the environmental impact. Permit\n23 Condition 111. 11.1.5 outlines the process by which waste sources in the IDF are modeled\n24 in an ongoing risk budget and a ground water impact analysis.\n25 III.11.1.1 Six months prior to IDF operations Permittees shall submit to Ecology for review,\n26 approval, and incorporation into the permit, all waste acceptance criteria to address, at a\n27 minimum, the following: physical/chemical criteria, liquids and liquid containing waste,\n28 land disposal restriction treatment standards and prohibitions, compatibility of waste with\n29 liner, gas generation, packaging, handling of packages, minimization of subsidence.\n30 111.11.1.1.a All containers/packages shall meet void space requirements pursuant to\n31 WAC 173-303-665(12).\n32 III.11.1.1.b Compliance Schedule\n33 111.1 1.1.b.i Six months prior to IDF operations, the Permittees shall submit to Ecology for review,\n34 approval, and incorporation into the permit any necessary modifications to the IDF Waste\n35 Analysis Plan (Chapters 3.0 of the IDF portion of this permit).\n36 111.11.1.2 ILAW Waste Acceptance Criteria\n37 The only ILAW forms acceptable for disposal at IDF are: (1) approved glass canisters\n38 that are produced in accordance with the terms, conditions, and requirements of the WTP\n39 portion of the Permit, and (2) the 50 bulk vitrification test boxes as specified in the\n40 Demonstration Bulk Vitrification System (DBVS) test plans.\n41 To assure protection of human health and the environment, it is necessary that the\n42 appropriate quality of glass be disposed at IDF. The Land Disposal Restrictions (LDR)\n43 Treatment Standard for eight metals (arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead,\n44 mercury, selenium and silver), when associated with High Level Waste, is HLVIT\n45 (40 CFR 268). Because these metals are constituents in the Hanford Tanks Waste, the\n46 LDR standard for ILAW disposed to IDF is HLVIT.\nConditions. 10\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI For any ILAW glass form(s) that DOE intends to dispose of in IDF, DOE will provide to\n2 Ecology for review, an ILAW Waste Form Technical Requirements Document\n3 (IWTRD). The IWTRD will contain:\n4 111.11.I.2.a WTP ILAW Waste Acceptance Criteria\n5 Ill.11.1.2.a.i A description of each specific glass formulation that DOE intends to use including a basis\n6 for why each specific formulation is proposed for use, which specific tank wastes the\n7 glass formulation is proposed for use with, the characteristics of the glass that are key to\n8 satisfactory performance (e.g., VHT, PCT, and TCLP and/or other approved performance\n9 testing methodologies that the parties agree are appropriate and necessary), the range in\n10 key characteristics anticipated if the specific glass formulation is produced on a\n11 production basis with tank waste, and the factors that DOE must protect against in\n12 producing the glass to ensure the intended glass characteristics will exist in the actual\n13 ILAW.\n14 Ill.11.1.2.a.ii A performance assessment that provides a reasonable basis for assurance that each glass\n15 formulation will, once disposed of in IDF in combination with the other waste volumes\n16 and waste forms planned for disposal at the entire Integrated Disposal Facility, be\n17 adequately protective of human health and the environment; and will not violate or be\n18 projected to violate all applicable state and federal laws, regulations and environmental\n19 standards.\n20 Within 60 days of a request by Ecology, the Permittees shall provide a separate model\n21 run using Ecology's assumptions and model input.\n22 11.1.2.a.iii A description of production processes including management controls and quality\n23 assurance/quality control requirements that assure that glass produced for each\n24 formulation will perform in a reasonably similar manner to the waste form assumed in the\n25 performance assessment for that formulation.\n26 The Permittees shall update the IWTRD consistent with the above requirements for\n27 review by Ecology consistent with their respective roles and authority as provided under\n28 the TPA. Ecology comments shall be dispositioned through the Review Comment\n29 Record (RCR) process and will be reflected in further modeling to modify the IDF ILAW\n30 Chapter 3.0, Waste Analysis Plan as appropriate.\n31 The initial IWTRD contained glass formulation data as required by Permit\n32 Condition 111.1 l.I.2.a.i, and was submitted on December 18, 2006 (AR Accession #\n33 0906020182). The performance assessment required by Permit Condition 111.1 1.1.2.a.ii,\n34 and the quality assurance/quality control requirements process required by Permit\n35 Condition 111.1 1.1.2.a.iii shall be submitted for Ecology review as soon as possible after\n36 issuance of the Final Tank Closure and Waste Management Environment Impact\n37 Statement (EIS) and receipt of underlying codes and data packages, and at least 180 days\n38 prior to the date DOE expects to receive waste at IDF. At a minimum, the Permittees\n39 shall submit updates to the IWTRD to Ecology every five years or more frequently with\n40 the next one due June 30, 2015, if any of the following conditions exist:\n41 * The Permittees submits a permit modification request allowing additional waste\n42 forms to be disposed of at IDF.\n43 * The WTP or other vitrification facility change their glass formulations from those\n44 previously included in the IWTRD.\n45 * An unanticipated event or condition occurs that Ecology determines would warrant\n46 an update to the IWTRD.\n47 III.11.1.2.a.iv The Permittees shall not dispose of any WTP ILAW not described and evaluated in the\n48 IWTRD.\nConditions. 11\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 111.11.1.3 ILAW Waste Acceptance Criteria Verification\n2 111.11.1.3.a Six months prior to disposing of ILAW in the IDF, the Permittees will submit an ILAW\n3 verification plan to Ecology for review and approval. This plan will be coordinated with\n4 WTP, Ecology, and the Permittees personnel. This plan will outline the specifics of\n5 verifying ILAW waste acceptance through WTP operating parameters, and/or glass\n6 sampling. The Plan will include physical sampling requirements for batches, glass\n7 formulations, and/or feed envelopes.\n8 111.11.1.4 Demonstration Bulk Vitrification System (DBVS) Bulk Vitrification Waste Acceptance\n9 Criteria\n10 111.1 1.1.4.a Bulk Vitrification waste forms that are acceptable to be disposed of at IDF are up to\n11 50 boxes of vitrified glass produced pursuant to the DBVS Research, Development, and\n12 Demonstration (RD&D) Permit from processing Hanford Tank S-109 tank waste.\n13 111.1 1.1.4.b If Bulk Vitrification is selected as a technology to supplement the Waste Treatment Plant,\n14 the IDF portion of the Permit will need to be modified to accept Bulk Vitrification Full\n15 Scale production waste forms. This modification will need to be accompanied by\n16 appropriate Tri-Party Agreement (TPA) changes (per M-062 requirements) and adequate\n17 risk assessment information sufficient for the Department of Ecology to meet its State\n18 Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) obligations.\n19 III.11.1.4.c DBVS Waste Acceptance Verification will occur on 100% of the waste packages.\n20 Pursuant to the DBVS RD&D Permit, a detailed campaign test report will be produced\n21 and submitted to Ecology detailing results of all testing performed on each waste package\n22 that is produced. IDF personnel shall review these reports to verify that the waste\n23 packages meet IDF Waste Acceptance Criteria.\n24 111.11.1.4.d The Permittees shall not dispose of any waste forms that do not comply with all\n25 appropriate and applicable treatment standards, including all applicable LDR.\n26 111.11.1.5 Modeling -Risk Budget Tool\n27 111.1 1.1.5.a The Permittees must create and maintain a modeling -risk budget tool, which models the\n28 future impacts of the planned IDF waste forms (including input from analyses performed\n29 as specified in Permit Conditions 111.1 1.1.2.a through 111.1 1.I.2.a.ii) and their impact to\n30 underlying vadose and ground water. This software tool will be submitted for Ecology\n31 review as soon as possible after issuance of Final Tank Closure and Waste Management\n32 EIS and receipt of underlying codes and data packages, and at least 180 days prior to the\n33 date DOE expects to receive waste at IDF. The risk budget tool shall be updated at least\n34 every 5 years. The model will be updated more frequently if needed, to support permit\n35 modifications or SEPA Threshold Determinations whenever a new waste stream or\n36 significant expansion is being proposed for the IDF. This risk budget tool shall be\n37 conducted in manner that is consistent with state and federal requirements, and represents\n38 a risk analysis of all waste previously disposed of in the entire IDF (both cell I and cell 2)\n39 and those wastes expected to be disposed of in the future for the entire IDF to determine\n40 cumulative impacts. The groundwater impact should be modeled to evaluate fate and\n41 transport in the groundwater aquifer(s) and should be compared against various\n42 performance standards including but not limited to drinking water standards (40 CFR 141\n43 and 40 CFR 143). Ecology will review modeling assumptions, input parameters, and\n44 results and will provide comments to the Permittees. Ecology comments shall be\n45 dispositioned through the Review Comment Record (RCR) process and will be reflected\n46 in further modeling to modify the IDF ILAW waste acceptance criteria as appropriate.\n47 11.1.5.a.i The modeling-risk budget tool will include a sensitivity analysis reflecting parameters\n48 and changes to parameters as requested by Ecology.\nConditions. 12\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Ill.11.1.5.a.ii If these modeling efforts indicate results within 75% of a performance standard\n2 [including but not limited to federal drinking water standards (40 CFR 141 and.\n3 40 CFR 143)], Ecology and the Permittees will meet to discuss mitigation measures or\n4 modified waste acceptance criteria for specific waste forms.\n5 III.11.1.5.a.iii When considering all the waste forms to be disposed of in IDF, the Permittees shall not\n6 dispose of any waste that will result (through forward looking modeling or in real\n7 groundwater concentrations data) in a violation of any state or federal regulatory limit,\n8 specifically including but not limited to drinking water standards for any constituent as\n9 defined in 40 CFR 141 and 40 CFR 143.\n10 111.11.1.6 The Permittees shall not dispose of any waste that is not in compliance with state and\n11 federal requirements as identified in Chapter 13.0.\n12 111.11.I.6.a In accordance with DOE's authority under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended\n13 and other applicable law, prior to disposing of any mixed immobilized low-activity waste\n14 (ILAW) in the IDF, DOE will certify to the State of Washington that it has determined\n15 that such ILAW is not high-level waste and meets the criteria and requirements outlined\n16 in DOE's consultation with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission beginning in 1993\n17 (Letter from R.M. Bernero, USNRC to J. Lytle, USDOE, dated March 2, 1993; Letter\n18 from J. Kinzer, USDOE, to C. J. Paperiello, USNRC, Classification of Hanford Low-\n19 Activity Tank Waste Fraction, dated March 7, 1996; and Letter from C.J. Paperiello,\n20 USNRC, to J. Kinzer, USDOE, Classification of Hanford Low-Activity Tank Waste\n21 Fraction, dated June 9, 1997). While the requirement to provide such certification is an\n22 enforceable obligation of this permit, the provision of such certification does not convey,\n23 or purport to convey, authority to Ecology to regulate the radioactive hazards of the waste\n24 under this permit.\n25 111.11.1.7 IDF Operational Waste Acceptance Criteria.\n26 111.1 1.7.a IDF operational activities (including decontamination, cleanup, and maintenance) will\n27 generate a small amount of waste. Waste that can meet IDF waste acceptance without\n28 treatment will be disposed of at the IDF. All other IDF operational waste will be\n29 managed pursuant to WAC 173-303-200.\n30\nConditions.13\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left bank.\n5\nConditions.14\n p\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nWASHINGTON STATE.\nDAE P A R TMENT 0 F Dangerous Waste Permit Application\nEC 0 L 0 G Y Part A Form\nDate Received Reviewed by: Date: 0 9 2 2 2 0 0 8\nMonth Day Year Approved by: L Date: 0 9 2 2 2 0 0 8\n0919 2008\n1. This form is submitted to: (place an \"X\" in the appropriate box)\nM Request modification to a final status permit (commonly called a \"Part B\" permit)\nD- Request a change under interim status\nO] Apply for a final status permit. This includes the application for the initial final status permit for a site or\nfor a permit renewal (i.e., a new permit to replace an expiring permit).\nO Establish interim status because of the wastes newly regulated on: (Date)\nList waste codes:\nII. EPA/State ID Number\nW A7 8 9 0008967\nIll. Name of Facility\nUS Department of Energy -Hanford Facility\nIV. Facility Location (Physical address not P.O. Box or Route Number)\nA. Street\n825 Jadwin\nCity or Town State ZIP Code\nRichland WA 99352\nCounty Code\n(if knowr) County Name\n0 10 15 1Benton\nB. C. Geographic Location D. Facility Existence Date\nLand Latitude (degrees, mins, secs) Longitude (degrees, mins, secs) Month Day Year\nF Refer to TOPO Map (Section XV.) 0 3 0 2 1 9 4 3\nV. Facility Mailing Address\nStreet or P.O. Box\nP.O. Box 550\nCity or Town State ZIP Code\nRichland WA 99352\nAddendum A. 1\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nVI. Facility contact (Person to be contacted regarding waste activities at facility)\nName (last) (first)\nBrockman David\nJob Title Phone Number (area code and number)\nManager (509) 376-7395\nContact Address\nStreet or P.O. Box\nP.O. Box 550\nCity or Town State ZIP Code\nRichland WA 99352\nVII. Facility Operator Information\nA. Name Phone Number\nDepartment of Energy Owner/Operator (509) 376-7395\nCH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Co-Operator for Integrated Disposal Facility* (509) 376-0556*\nStreet or P.O. Box\nP.O. Box 550\nP.O. Box 1600 *\nCity or Town State ZIP Code\nRichland WA 99352\nB. Operator Type F\nC. Does the name in VII.A reflect a proposed change in operator? _ Yes No Co- erator* change\nif yes, provide the scheduled date for the change: Month Day Year\n1 0 0 1 2 0 0 8\nD. Is the name listed in VII.A. also the owner? If yes, skip to Section VIII.C. Yes I No\nVIII. Facility Owner Information\nA. Name Phone Number (area code and number)\nDavid A. Brockman, Operator/Facility-Property Owner (509) 376-7395\nStreet or P.O. Box\nP.O. Box 550\nCity or Town State ZIP Code\nRichland WA 99352\nB. Owner Type F\nC. Does the name in VIII.A reflect a proposed change in owner? Yes No\nIf yes, provide the scheduled date for the change: Month Day Year\nIX. NAICS Codes (5/6 digit codes)\nA. First B. Second\n5 16 2 2 1 Waste Treatment& Disposal 9 2 4 1 1 0 Administration of Air & Water Resource &\nSolid Waste Management Programs\nC. Third D. Fourth\n5 4 1 7 1 Research & Development in the\nPhysical, Engineering, & Lfe Sciences\nAddendum A.2\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nX. Other Environmental Permits (see instructions)\nA. Permit Type B. Permit Number C. Description\nXI. Nature of Business (provide a brief description that includes both dangerous waste and non-dangerous\nwaste areas and activities)\nThe Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF) is an expandable lined landfill located in the 200 East Area of the\nHanford Facility. The landfill is divided lengthwise into distinct east and west cells, one for disposal of low-\nlevel radioactive waste (the east cell) and the other for disposal of mixed waste (the west cell). The cell for\ndisposal of low-level radioactive waste is outside the scope of this permit.\nMixed waste disposed at the IDF is currently limited to vitrified low-activity waste (LAW) from the Waste\nTreatment Plant (WTP) and Demonstration Bulk Vitrification System (DBVS). Additionally, mixed waste\ngenerated by IDF operations will be disposed of in IDF. (The IDF Permit requires modification if other waste\nstreams are proposed for disposal.) The vitrified waste form generated by both the WTP and the DBVS\nfacilities is known as Immobilized Low Activity Waste (ILAW) .The amount shown in Section XII of\n8.2-hectare meters (82,000 cubic meters) is the waste capacity of the initial construction. The amount will be\nrevised as required for future expansion to accommodate the entire waste volume through an approved\npermit modification.\nD80\nMixed radioactive high level wastes stored in the Double-Shell and Single-Shell Tank System carry the\ncharacteristic dangerous waste numbers D002, and D004 through D011 .The specified technology based\ntreatment standard for high-level radioactive waste as described in 40 CFR 268.40 (vitrification) will be used\nto produce the waste form that will be placed in steel canisters or steel boxes. Tank waste will meet this\nvitrification standard as the waste exits at the Waste Treatment Plant or Demonstration Bulk Vitrification\nSystem Facility. (Permit conditions for the WTP and DBVS require that the D001 and D003 waste codes be\nremoved prior to the waste stream entering these facilities.)\nIDF operational activities (including decontamination, cleanup, and maintenance) will generate a small\namount of waste. Waste that can meet IDF waste acceptance without treatment will be buried at the IDF.\nAll other IDF operational waste will be managed pursuant to WAC 173-303-200 and either sent to a 90-day\naccumulation area or directly to another permitted TSD for treatment. Treated IDF operational waste will\neither be buried at IDF or sent to another permitted Hanford TSD for final disposition.\nSol\nProcess Code SO1 (container storage) has been included within this Part A Form in the event that storage is\nrequired before final disposal (e.g., to support the staging and confirmation process of the waste or cooling\nof vitrified waste if required).\nAddendum A.3\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nEXAMPLE FOR COMPLETING ITEMS XII and XIII (shown in lines numbered X-1, X-2, and X-3 below): A facility has\ntwo storage tanks that hold 1200 gallons and 400 gallons respectively. There is also treatment in tanks at 20 gallons/hr.\nFinally, a one-quarter acre area that is two meters deep will undergo in situ vitrification.\nSection XII. Process Codes and Design Section XI1I. Other Process Codes\nCapacities\nB. Process Design B Process Design\nCapa :ity C. A Capacsity C.\nLine A. Process Process Line PrCaacs Pros D Process\nNumber Codes 2. Unit of Totai Number Codes 1. Amun o De s\n(enter code) 1. Amount Measure Number (1trco. .Amount measure Number cio(enter of Units o (enter ofUnits\ncode) code)\nX 1 S 0 2 1,600 G 002 X 1 T 0 4 700 C 001 Insitu\nvitrification\nX 2 T 0 3 20 E 001\nX 3 T 0 4 700 C 001\nI D 8 0 8.2 F 1 1\n2 SO1 * * 1 2\n3 3\n4 4\n5 5\n6 6\n7 7\n8 8\n9 9\n1 0 1 0\n11 1 1\n12 1 2\n13 1 3\n14 1 4\n1 5 1 5\n1 6 1 6\n1 7 1 7\n18 1 8\n19 1 9\n20 2 0\n2 1 2 1\n2 2 2 2\n23 2 3\n24 2 4\n25 2 5\nAddendum A.4\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nXIV. Description of Dangerous Wastes\nExample for completing this section: A facility will receive three non-listed wastes, then store and treat them on-site.\nTwo wastes are corrosive only, with the facility receiving and storing the wastes in containers. There will be about 200\npounds per year of each of these two wastes, which will be neutralized in a tank. The other waste is corrosive and\nignitable and will be neutralized then blended into hazardous waste fuel. There will be about 100 pounds per year of that\nwaste, which will be received in bulk and put into tanks.\nB. Estimated D. Processes\nLine A. Dangerous Annual C. Unitof (2) Process Description\nNumber Waste No. Quantity of Measure (1) Process Codes [If a code is not entered in D (1)]Waste_______________ __\nX 1 D 0 0 2 400 P S 0 1 T 0 1\nX2 D 0 0 1 100 P S02T 01\nX 3 D 0 0 2 Included with above\n1 D 0 0 2 20,000,000 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n2 D 0 0 4 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n3 D 0 0 5 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n4 D 0 0 6 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n5 D 0 0 7 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n6 D 0 0 8 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n7 D 0 0 9 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n8 D 0 1 0 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n9 D 0 1 1 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n10 D 0 1 8 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n11 D 0 1 9 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n12 D 0 2 2 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n13 D 0 2 8 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n14 D 0 2 9 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n15 D 0 3 0 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n16 D 0 3 3 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n17 D 0 3 4 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n18 D 0 3 5 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n19 D 0 3 6 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n20 D 0 3 8 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n21 D 0 3 9 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n22 D 0 4 0 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n23 D 0 4 1 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n24 D 0 4 3 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n25 W T 0 1 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\nAddendum A.5\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nEPA/State ID Number W A 7 8 9 0 0 0 8 9 6 7\nContinuation of Section XIV. Description of Dangerous Waste\nA. Dangerous B. Estimated C. Unit of D. ProcessLine Naste No Annual Measure\nNumber (enter code) Quat of (cde) (1) Process Codes (enter) (2) Process Description\n_______Wast code ______ ____ffacodeis notenteredi!]0(11\n26 W T 0 2 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n27 W P 0 1 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n28 W P 0 2 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n29 F 0 0 1 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n30 F 0 0 2 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n31 F 0 0 3 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n32 F 0 0 4 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n33 F 0 0 5 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n34 F 0 3 9 K D 8 0 Includes Debris\n35 D 0 0 1 600,000* K S 0 1* Includes Debris\n36 D 0 0 2 K S 0 1* Includes Debris\n37 D 0 0 3 K S 0 1* Includes Debris\n38 D 0 0 4 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n39 D 0 0 5 K S 0 1* Includes Debris\n40 D 0 0 6 K S 0 V' Includes Debris\n41 D 0 0 7 K S 0 V' Includes Debris\n42 D 0 0 8 K S 0 V' Includes Debris\n43 D 0 0 9 K S 0 1* Includes Debris\n44 D 0 1 0 K S 0 1* Includes Debris\n45 D 0 1 1 K S 0 1* Includes Debris\n46 D 0 1 8 K S 0 1* Includes Debris\n47 D 0 1 9 K S 0 V' Includes Debris\n48 D 0 2 2 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n49 D 0 2 8 K S 0 1* Includes Debris\n50 D 0 2 9 K S 0 1* Includes Debris\n51 D 0 3 0 K S 0 1* Includes Debris\n52 D 0 3 3 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n53 D 0 3 4 K S 0 l' Includes Debris\n54 D 0 3 5 K S 0 1* Includes Debris\n55 D 0 3 6 K S 0 1* Includes Debris\n56 D 0 3 8 K S 0 V Includes Debris\n57 D 0 3 9 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n58 D 0 4 0 K S 0 lv Includes Debris\nAddendum A.6\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nEPA/State ID Number W A 7 8 9 0 0 0 8 9 6 7\nContinuation of Section XIV. Description of Dangerous Waste\nA. Dangerous B. Estimated C. Unit of D. PrcessLine Waste No. Annual Measure\nNumber (enter code) Quantity of (enter (2) Process Description\nWaste code) _ () Process Codes (enter) [If a code is not entered in D (1)1\n59 D 0 4 1 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n60 D 0 4 3 K S 0 1* Includes Debris\n61 W T 0 1 K S 0 l' Includes Debris\n62 W T 0 2 K S 0 Ii Includes Debris\n63 W P 0 1 K S 0 r Includes Debris\n64 W P 0 2 K S 0 1* Includes Debris\n65 F 0 0 1 K S 0 1* Includes Debris\n66 F 0 0 2 K S 0 1* Includes Debris\n67 F 0 0 3 K S 0 1* Includes Debris\n68 F 0 0 4 K S 0 1* Includes Debris\n69 F 0 0 5 K S 0 l' Includes Debris\n70 F 0 3 9 K S 0 1* Includes Debris\n71\n72\n73\n74\n75\n76\n77\n78\n79\n80\n81\n82\n83\n84\n85\n86\n87\n88\n89\n90\nAddendum A.7\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nXV. Map\nAttach to this application a topographic map of the area extending to at least one (1) mile beyond property boundaries. The\nmap must show the outline of the facility; the location of each of its existing and proposed intake and discharge structures;\neach of its dangerous waste treatment, storage, recycling, or disposal units; and each well where fluids are injected\nunderground. Include all springs, rivers, and other surface water bodies in this map area, plus drinking water wells listed in\npublic records or otherwise known to the applicant within /, mile of the facility property boundary. The instructions provide\nadditional information on meeting these requirements.\nTopographic map is located in the Ecology Library\nXVI. Facility Drawing\nAll existing facilities must include a scale drawing of the facility (refer to Instructions for more detail).\nXVII. Photographs\nAll existing facilities must include photographs (aerial or ground-level) that clearly delineate all existing structures; existing\nstorage, treatment, recycling, and disposal areas; and sites of future storage, treatment, recycling, or disposal areas (refer to\nInstructions for more detail).\nXVIll. Certifications\nI certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or\nsupervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and\nevaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or\nthose persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my\nknowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for\nsubmitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.\nOperator Signature Date Signed\nName and Official Title (type or print)\nDavid A. Brockman, Manager\nU.S. Department of Energy\nRichland Operations Office\nCo-Operator* Signature Date Signed\nName and Official Title (type or print)\nJohn G. Lehew, III\nPresident and Chief Executive Officer\nCH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company\nCo-Operator -Address and Telephone Number*\nP.O. Box 1600\nRichland, WA 99352\n(509) 376-0556\nFacility-Property Owner Sig ure Date Signed\nName and Official Title (type or print)\nDavid A. Brockman, Manager Iq\nU.S. Department of EnergyI\nRichland Operations Office\nAddendum A.8\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nComments\nIn Section VII. Facility Operator Information, there is no change to DOE as the Facility Owner/Operator; only a change\nin Co-Operator*. The change in Co-Operator* will be effective October 1, 2008.\nAddendum A.9\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Integrated Disposal Facility\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8 C Plant\n9 241-AW\n241-AP\njcot\n200 East Area\nGetsRoute4 Soias TSO Unit Futur Ingated\n(penrataed pension Disposa\na rea) Facl\nTeo Unit (pormitted vre)\nLwLevel not pffnld\nTSo 2 tarmnt. storeae, anudor leposI.\nIDF 200 East Area Locational References\nAddendum A.10\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI4\nX Li\nIntegrated 299E24 21\niposa /l Low Level Waste Boundary\n299-E24.24 -1 299-E24-18 9-2f\nT, . 2.....7-2. .\nX9 299-E9-E79\ni299-E17-13\n2992- 2 299-E17-17\n'21 2299217-20\nI)I\n299-ET4\nCotusat1MtrIvl SrieRas I/D N ENERGY- Deo nr M I -224 .94- 2\nRIHADDPRTONOFICEW~ Oeang Knweeasesructues\nCreated and Published by: Location -Linear SWMUs and Known ReleasesCenra Mping Servcesx Spot SWMUs and Known Releases\n(509) 373-9076 Ms Feet\nIN TENDED USE: REFERENCE ONLY 0 50 100 150 200 0 200 400 600\nO:\\Projects\\20051RCRAjTSD050614_ 2ndPridFaciltyTopos200SThompsonwrapsb080519_IDF LineDw85x11_ RevO.mxnd -7AW2008 @ 2:23:49 PM?\nA n A1AdDm Oatin ratrcue\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum A.12\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nCHAPTER 2.0\nTOPOGRAPHIC MAP DESCRIPTION\nChapter 2.i\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\n6\nChapter 2.ii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2 CHAPTER 2.0\n3 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP DESCRIPTION\n4\n5\n6 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n7 2.0 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP DESCRIPTION ................................... ......2.5\n8 2.1 Introduction .............................................................. 2.5\n9\n10\n11\nChapter 2.iii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nChapter 2.iv\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 2.0 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP DESCRIPTION\n2 2.1 Introduction\n3 A topographic map is located in the Department of Ecology library (3100 Port of Benton Boulevard,\n4 Richland, WA 99354) reflecting general topographic requirements and the area set aside for IDF. The\n5 actual dimensions and waste volume capacity of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)\n6 trench that is being permitted are described in the Part A and Appendix 4A of the IDF portion of this\n7 permit. The IDF is located on the Hanford Facility, which limits the use of surrounding land to\n8 Department of Energy activities. There are no surface waters in the area defined on the topographical\n9 map. Chapter 5.0 includes figures that reflect additional requirements for topographic maps. For the\n10 point of compliance and proposed groundwater wells see Figure 5-8, and for the aquifer location see\n11 Figure 5-4 and Section 5.3 for the identification of the aquifer.\n12\nChapter 2.5\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nChapter 2.6\n N\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2 CHAPTER 3.0\n3 WASTE ANALYSIS PLAN\n4\n5\nChapter 3.i\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nChapter 3.ii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 CHAPTER 3.0\n2 WASTE ANALYSIS PLAN\n3 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n4 WASTE ANALYSIS [C] ........................................................ 3.iv\n5 CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, AND PHYSICAL ANALYSIS [C-1 ......... .................... 3.iv\n6 WASTE ANALYSIS PLAN [C-2] ................................................... 3.iv\n7 3.0 INTEGRATED DISPOSAL FACILITY WASTE ANALYSIS PLAN........................3.8\n8 3.1 Description of Unit Processes and Activities. .................................. 3.8\n9 3.2 Identification and Classification of Waste .................................... 3.8\n10 3.3 Management of Waste .......................................... ....... 3.9\n11 3.3.1 Newly Generated Waste within the IDF.............................. .......3.10\n12 3.4 Confirmation Process................ ........................ ....... 3.12\n13 3.4.1 Pre-Shipment Review ............................................ ..... 3.12\n14 3.4.2 Verification ....................................................... 3.16\n15 3.4.3 Waste Acceptance ................................................... 3.17\n16 3.4.4 Selecting Waste Analysis Parameters ................................................ 3.19\n17 3.4.5 Selecting Sampling Procedures........................................... 3.19\n18 3.4.6 Selecting A Laboratory, Laboratory Testing, And Analytical Methods ........... ..... 3.19\n19 3.4.7 Selecting Waste Re-Evaluation Frequencies .................................. 3.19\n20 3.4.8 Special Waste Analysis Procedural Requirements ......................... ..... 3.19\n21 3.4.9 Procedures for Ignitable, Reactive, and Incompatible Waste ......... .................. 3.20\n22 3.4.10 Provisions for Complying With Federal and State Land Disposal Restriction\n23 Requirements ...................................................... 3.20\n24 3.4.11 Off-Specification Waste....................................... .............. 3.21\n25 3.5 Waste Tracking ..................................................... 3.21\n26 3.6 Recordkeeping ..................................................... 3.21\n27 3.7 References........................................................3.21\n28\n29 FIGURES\n30 Figure 1. Waste Transfers and Analysis Plan Onsite TSD Units Flow Diagram. .......... ...........3.11\n31 Figure 2. Vitrification or Alternative Method Transfer and Waste Analysis Plan Process\n32 Flow Diagram.....................................................3.18\n33\n34 TABLES\n35 Table 1. Chemicals Incompatible With the High Density Polyethylene Liner (in\n36 concentrated form)* ....................................... ........3.11\n37 Table 2. Parameters and Rationale for Physical Screening ........................ .....3.19\n38\nChapter 3.iii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 WASTE ANALYSIS [C]\n2 This chapter provides information on the chemical, biological, and physical characteristics of the waste\n3 treated for disposal. The information includes descriptions required by WAC 173-303-300(5) contained\n4 in the Waste Analysis Plan for the Integrated Disposal Facility.\n5 CHEMICAL, BIOLOGICAL, AND PHYSICAL ANALYSIS [C-1]\n6 The primary mission of the IDF will be to dispose of vitrified waste generated on the Hanford Site. This\n7 includes vitrified LAW from the RPP-WTP and DBVS, and low-level radioactive waste. Additionally,\n8 waste generated through IDF operations will be disposed of in IDF. Waste to be disposed of in IDF is\n9 assigned dangerous waste numbers found in Chapter 1.0.\n10 WASTE ANALYSIS PLAN [C-2]\n11 The Waste Analysis Plan for the Integrated Disposal Facility summarizes waste acceptance processes and\n12 contains the following information: unit description, confirmation process, selection of waste analysis\n13 parameters, selection of sampling procedures, selection of a laboratory, laboratory testing, and analytical\n14 methods, selection of waste re-evaluation frequencies, special procedural requirements, and\n15 recordkeeping requirements.\n16\nChapter 3.iv\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 GLOSSARY\n2\n3 AEA Atomic Energy Act of 1954\n4 BVW bulk vitrification waste\n5 CAP corrective action plan\n6 CFR Code of Federal Regulations\n7 COLIWASA composite liquid waste sampler\n8 oC degree Celsius\n9\n10 DOE-ORP U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection\n11 DOE-RL U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office\n12 DBVS Demonstration Bulk Vitrification System\n13 DST double-shell tank\n14\n15 Ecology Washington State Department of Ecology\n16\n17 IDF Integrated Disposal Facility\n18 ILAW immobilized low-activity waste\n19 LDR land disposal restriction\n20\n21 NDE nondestructive examination\n22\n23 PPE personal protective equipment\n24\n25 QA quality assurance\n26 QC quality control\n27\n28 RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976\n29 RCW Revised Code of Washington\n30 RPP-WTP River Protection Project-Waste Treatment Plant\n31\n32 SWITS Solid Waste Information Tracking System\n33\n34 TRU transuranic\n35 TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976\n36 TSD treatment, storage, and/or disposal\n37\n38 WAC Washington Administrative Code\n39 WAP waste analysis plan\n40\nChapter 3.v\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nMETRIC CONVERSION CHART\nInto metric units Out of metric units\nIf you know Multiply by To get If you know Multiply by To get\nLength Length\ninches 25.40 millimeters millimeters 0.03937 inches\ninches 2.54 centimeters centimeters 0.393701 inches\nfeet 0.3048 meters meters 3.28084 feet\nyards 0.9144 meters meters 1.0936 yards\nmiles (statute) 1.60934 kilometers kilometers 0.62137 miles (statute)\nArea Area\nsquare inches 6.4516 square square 0.155 square inches\ncentimeters centimeters\nsquare feet 0.09290304 square meters square meters 10.7639 square feet\nsquare yards 0.8361274 square meters square meters 1.19599 square yards\nsquare miles 2.59 square square 0.386102 square miles\nkilometers kilometers\nacres 0.404687 hectares hectares 2.47104 acres\nMass (weight) Mass (weight)\nounces (avoir) 28.34952 grams grams 0.035274 ounces (avoir)\npounds 0.45359237 kilograms kilograms 2.204623 pounds (avoir)\ntons (short) 0.9071847 j tons (metric) Tons (metric) 1.1023 tons (short)\nVolume Volume\nounces 29.57353 milliliters milliliters 0.033814 ounces\n(U.S., liquid) (U.S., liquid)\nquarts 0.9463529 liters liters 1.0567 quarts\n(U.S., liquid) (U.S., liquid)\ngallons 3.7854 liters liters 0.26417 gallons\n(U.S., liquid) (U.S., liquid)\ncubic feet 0.02831685 cubic meters cubic meters 35.3147 cubic feet\ncubic yards 0.7645549 cubic meters cubic meters 1.308 cubic yards\nTemperature Temperature\nFahrenheit subtract 32 Celsius Celsius multiply by Fahrenheit\nthen 9/5ths, then\nmultiply by add 32\n5/9ths\nEnergy Energy\nkilowatt hour 3,412 British thermal British thermal 0.000293 kilowatt hour\nunit unit\nkilowatt 0.94782 British thermal British thermal 1.055 kilowatt\nunit per second unit per second\nForce/Pressure Force/Pressure\npounds (force) 6.894757 kilopascals kilopascals 0.14504 pounds per\nper square inch square inch\n2 06/2001\n3 Source: Engineering Unit Conversions, M. R. Lindeburg, PE., Third Ed., 1993, Professional\n4 Publications, Inc., Belmont, California.\n5\nChapter 3.vi\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nChapter 3.vii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 3.0 INTEGRATED DISPOSAL FACILITY WASTE ANALYSIS PLAN\n2 Pursuant to WAC 173-303-300(5) this waste analysis plan (WAP) documents the waste acceptance\n3 process, sampling methodologies, analytical techniques, and overall processes that will be undertaken for\n4 mixed waste accepted for disposal at the Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF). .Mixed waste disposed at\n5 the IDF will be limited to vitrified low-activity waste (LAW) from the RPP-WTP and DBVS and mixed\n6 waste generated by IDF operations. (see Chapter 1, Part A Form). Vitrified LAW generated by RPP-\n7 WTP is known as Immobilized Low Activity Waste (ILAW) and generated by DBVS is known as Bulk\n8 Vitrified Waste (BVW). The IDF will be located in the 200 East Area of the Hanford Facility.\n9 The IDF also will receive low-level waste for disposal. Mixed waste will not be placed in the low-level\n10 waste portion of the IDF. The requirements of this WAP are applicable to mixed waste and are not\n11 applicable to the low-level radioactive waste. The term 'treatment, storage, and/or disposal (TSD) unit' is\n12 used throughout this WAP to refer to the IDF. Activities will be performed by the IDF operating\n13 organization, waste acceptance organization, or its delegated representative.\n14 Although the treatment and disposal of radioactive waste (i.e., source, special nuclear, and by-product\n15 materials as defined by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954) are not within the scope of Resource\n16 Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of l976 or WAC 173-303, information is provided for general\n17 knowledge.\n18 3.1 Description of Unit Processes and Activities\n19 The IDF will be a single, expandable disposal facility constructed to RCRA Subtitle C standards, half of\n20 which is for disposal of mixed waste the other half will be for disposal of low-level waste. Initial capacity\n21 for mixed waste disposal is 82,000 cubic meters of waste with an ultimate capacity of up to 450,000 cubic\n22 meters of waste. Disposal capacity beyond the initial 82,000 cubic meters will require a modification to\n23 the Part B Permit. The mixed waste types to be disposed in the IDF include vitrified LAW from the\n24 RPP-WTP and DBVS. Additionally, mixed waste generated by IDF operations will be disposed of in\n25 IDF.\n26 The mission of the RCRA portion of the IDF is to provide an approved disposal facility for the\n27 permanent, environmentally safe disposition of mixed waste and RCRA waste.\n28 For ILAW, and BVW the container packaging and handling will be designed to maintain containment of\n29 each waste type, limit intrusion, and limit human exposure at the IDF. ILAW containers will be\n30 transported from the RPP-WTP to the IDF using a tractor-trailer system. BVW will be transported from\n31 the DBVS staging area to IDF using a similar system. Transport of the ILAW and BVW to the landfill\n32 will occur along a pre-determined route.\n33 The lined landfill will have a leachate collection and removal system. The leachate collection tanks will\n34 be operated in accordance with the generator provisions of WAC 173-303-200 and are not subject to this\n35 WAP.\n36 Additional information is located in Chapter 1.0 (IDF Part A) and Chapter 4.0 (Process Information).\n37 3.2 Identification and Classification of Waste\n38 The ILAW, BVW, and newly generated mixed waste will be accepted for disposal. The mixed waste\n39 disposed of at the IDF is received from waste generated within IDF, and two other Hanford Facility TSD\n40 units (RPP-WTP and DBVS). The following waste will not be accepted for disposal at this TSD unit:\n41 * Waste is not accepted for disposal when the waste contains free-standing liquid unless all\n42 free-standing liquid:\n43 o Has been removed by decanting or other methods.\n44 o Has been mixed with sorbent or stabilized (solidified) so that free-standing liquid is no longer\n45 observed.\n46 o Otherwise has been eliminated.\nChapter 3.8\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 o Container is very small, such as an ampoule.\n2 o Container is a labpack and is disposed in accordance with WAC 173-303-161 or 40 CFR\n3 264.316.\n4 o Container is designed to hold free liquids for use other than storage, such as a battery or\n5 capacitor.\n6 There could be cases in which small amounts of residual liquids are present in mixed waste containers\n7 because condensate has formed following packaging or free liquids remain in debris items (e.g.,\n8 pumps, tubing) even after draining. When it is not practical to remove this residual liquid, the free\n9 liquid must be eliminated to the extent possible by adding a quantity of sorbent sufficient to sorb all\n10 residual liquids.\n11 Free liquid is determined by SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical\n12 Method, Method 9095 (Paint Filter Liquids Test) [WAC 173-303-140(4)(b) and 40 CFR 264.314(d)]\n13 only for waste that has the potential for free liquid formation.\n14 * Gaseous waste not accepted for disposal if the is waste packaged at a pressure in excess of 1.5\n15 atmospheres at 200C.\n16 * Pyrophoric waste is not accepted for disposal. Waste containing less that 1 weight percent\n17 pyrophoric material partially or completely dispersed in each package is not considered\n18 pyrophoric for the purposes of this requirement.\n19 * Solid acid waste is not accepted for disposal [WAC 173-303-140(4)(c)].\n20 * Extremely hazardous waste that does not meet WAC 173-303-140(4)(d) is not accepted for\n21 disposal. Extremely hazardous waste that has been treated could be disposed in accordance with\n22 Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 70.105.050(2), \"Hazardous Waste Management.\"\n23 * Organic/carbonaceous waste that does not meet WAC 173-303-140(4)(d) is not accepted for\n24 disposal.\n25 * Waste not meeting the LDR treatment standards is not accepted for disposal [40 CFR 268 and\n26 WAC 173-303-140(4)].\n27 * Waste streams will be evaluated during pre-shipment review to ensure that the waste streams do\n28 not contain constituents incompatible with the liner system in concentration sufficient to degrade\n29 the liner. Table 1 provides a list of chemicals shown to be incompatible with the liner material at\n30 100% concentrations (WHC-SD-WM-TI-714). In general, mixed waste that meets federal and\n31 state treatment standards would be compatible with the TSD unit liner system. Waste accepted at\n32 the IDF will be compatible with the liner. Constituents in Table I will not be accepted for\n33 disposal (refer to Section 3.4.9 for waste stream compatibility).\n34 3.3 Management of Waste\n35 The ILAW, BVW, and newly generated wastes (see Section 3.3.1) generated during normal. operations of\n36 this TSD unit are accepted at this TSD unit for disposal. The two onsite TSD units (RPP-WTP and\n37 DBVS) transferring/shipping waste to this TSD unit hereafter are referred to as the 'generator' unless\n38 otherwise denoted in this WAP. The waste acceptance process for transfers from the generator is\n39 identified in Figure 1.\n40 Written waste tracking procedure(s) are implemented to ensure waste received at the TSD unit matches\n41 the manifest or transfer papers, to ensure that the waste is tracked though the TSD unit to final\n42 disposition, and to maintain the information required in WAC 173-303-380. The waste tracking process\n43 provides a mechanism to track waste through a uniquely identified container. The unique identifier is a\n44 barcode (or equivalent) that is recorded in the Solid Waste Information Tracking System (SWITS). This\n45 mechanism encompasses the waste acceptance process, the movement of waste, the processing of waste,\n46 and management of the waste.\nChapter 3.9\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The container identification number provides traceability between the TSD unit and the hard copy of\n2 records that are maintained as part of the operating record to ensure information relative to the location,\n3 quantity, and physical and chemical characteristics of the waste are available.\n4 The following sections describe the process for waste acceptance and the different types of information\n5 and knowledge reviewed/required during the acceptance process. The process for management of waste\n6 is described in Section 3.4.\n7 3.3.1 Newly Generated Waste within the IOF\n8 This TSD unit generates mixed waste as a result of operational (e.g., chemical, radiological) activities.\n9 These activities include, transfer functions along with inspection, decontamination, cleanup, maintenance\n10 tasks and leachate collection. The IDF generated operational waste will be maintained in accordance with\n11 generator provisions of WAC 173-303-200 and WAC 173-303-600(3)(d). Any newly generated waste\n12 (except leachate) not meeting IDF waste acceptance criteria will be designated and sent to another\n13 permitted TSD or to a 90 day accumulation area. IDF leachate will be managed in accordance with\n14 WAC 173-303-200 and transferred to the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility/Effluent Treatment Facility\n15 (LERF/ETF) (or other permitted TSD) for treatment. Solids or residuals resulting from IDF leachate\n16 treatment may be designated/packaged and sent back to the IDF for burial or to another permitted TSD.\nChapter 3.10\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nWaste Stream and Waste Transfer\n2 Transfer Need Waste Transfer Documentation\n3 is Identified - Information is - is Received\n4 Documented and Approved\n5\n6\n7\n8\n9\n10 Receipt Documentation and\n11 Waste is Inspection Perform Marking/Labeling\n12 Transferred Is Work . are Updated\n13 to TSD Unit Completed Through Processing\n14 1 1\n15\n16\n17\n18 Waste is\n19 Transferred\n20 for disposal\n21 T0201034.1\n22\n23 Figure 1. Waste Transfers and Analysis Plan Onsite TSD Units Flow Diagram.\n24\n25 Table 1. Chemicals Incompatible with the High Density Polyethylene Liner (in\n26 concentrated form)*\nChemical CAS Number\nAmyl chloride 543-59-9\nAqua regia 8007-56-5\nBromic acid 15541-45-4\nBromobenzene 108-86-1\nBromoform 75-25-2\nCalcium bisulfite 13780-03-5\nCalcium sulfide 20548-54-3\nDiethyl benzene 25340-17-4\nDiethyl ether 60-29-7\nBromine 7726-95-6\nChlorine 7782-50-5\nFluorine 7782-41-4\nEthyl chloride 75-00-3\nEthylene trichloride 79-01-6\nNitrobenzene 98-95-3\nPerchlorobenzene 118-74-1\nPropylene dichloride 78-87-5\nSulfur trioxide 7446-11-9\nSulfuric acid (fuming) 8014-95-7\nThionyl chloride 7719-09-7\nVinylidene chloride. 75-35-4\n27 CAS = Chemical Abstract Service.\n28 * WHC-SD-WM-TI-714\nChapter 3.11\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 3.4 Confirmation Process\n2 WAC 173-303-300(1) requires confirmation on mixed waste before acceptance of waste into a waste\n3 management unit. The confirmation process consists of two parts, pre-shipment review, and verification.\n4 Confirmation activities are performed in accordance with TSD unit-specific governing documentation.\n5 The confirmation process is detailed in Figure 2 for ILAW and BVW.\n6 3.4.1 Pre-Shipment Review\n7 Pre-shipment review takes place before waste can be scheduled for transfer or shipment to this TSD unit.\n8 The review focuses on whether the waste stream is defined accurately and meets the TSD unit waste\n9 acceptance criteria and whether the LDR status is determined correctly. Only waste determined to be\n10 acceptable for storage (see Section 3.4.1.2.2) and/or disposal is scheduled. This determination is based on\n11 the information provided by the generator. The pre-shipment review consists of waste stream approval\n12 and the waste shipment approval process. The following sections discuss the pre-shipment review\n13 process. The information obtained during the pre-shipment review, at a minimum, includes all\n14 information necessary to safely dispose of the waste. The pre-shipment review ensures the waste is\n15 characterized and the data provided qualify as 'acceptable knowledge' (Section 3.4.1.4).\n16 3.4.1.1 Pre-Shipment Review of Wastes\n17 Pre-shipment review for ILAW and BVW waste containers will take place at RPP-WTP and the DBVS\n18 staging area respectively before either type of containers can be scheduled for transfer to the IDF. The\n19 review will focus on whether the waste stream is defined accurately, meets the waste acceptance criteria,\n20 and the land disposal restrictions (LDR) status was determined correctly. Only waste determined to be\n21 acceptable for storage (see Section 3.4.1.2.2) and/or disposal will be scheduled. This determination will\n22 be based on the information provided by the generator. The pre-transfer review will consist of the waste\n23 profile documentation and waste transfer approval process. The following sections discuss the\n24 pre-transfer review process. ILAW and BVW containers received for land disposal will be at least 90%\n25 full. The information obtained from the generator, at a minimum, will contain five elements:\n26 (1) Documentation to ensure waste can be managed pursuant to the Part A, Form 3.\n27 (2) Documentation to ensure the waste is not a prohibited waste in accordance with Section 3.2,\n28 (3) A determination if the waste is an ignitable, reactive, or incompatible waste as defined in\n29 WAC 173-303-040.\n30 (4) Documentation that waste meets LDR requirements of 40 CFR 268 and WAC 173-303-140.\n31 (5) Operational restrictions on acceptance of waste.\n32 During the waste profile documentation process for ILAW and BVW containers, the generator will have\n33 the responsibility to provide relevant information pertaining to the proper management of the waste.\n34 Characterization information pertaining to the treatment of ILAW and BVW will be obtained during the\n35 waste profile documentation process.\n36 3.4.1.2 Waste Stream Approval Process for Wastes\n37 The waste stream approval process consists of reviewing stream information supplied on a waste stream\n38 profile and supporting documentation to allow receipt of the waste into the IDF. Waste stream\n39 compatibility (i.e., compatibility between individual waste streams and compatibility between waste\n40 streams and landfill design and construction parameters) will be assessed on a case-by-case basis.\n41 Criteria for assessing and determining compatibility will be identified in either the facility Waste\n42 Acceptance Criteria, Waste Analysis Plan, or other protocol or procedure as appropriate.\n43 3.4.1.2.1 Waste Stream Approval for ILAW and BVW\n44 During the waste profile documentation process, the IDF waste acceptance organization will obtain the\n45 following information:\nChapter 3.12\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * Description of waste generating process\n2 * Characterization data\n3 * Dangerous waste numbers\n4 * LDR data (as specified in Section 3.4.10)\n5 * Composition of ILAW and BVW including regulated constituents of concern (refer to Chapter\n6 1.0 of the permit application -Part A Form)\n7 The waste profile documentation process will be as follows.\n8 1. Appropriate generator fills out waste profile documentation.\n9 2. The IDF designated waste acceptance organization reviews the waste profile information against\n10 the waste acceptance criteria for each ILAW or BVW transfer.\n11 3. If discrepancies are noted, the IDF designated waste acceptance organization requests additional\n12 information from the generator to address discrepancies for either: (1) inconsistent information\n13 and (2) information not constituting acceptable knowledge (refer to Section 3.4.1.4.1).\n14 Information (waste profile documentation) is resubmitted by the generator addressing concerns in\n15 Item 3.\n16 * If concerns are addressed, waste profile documentation is approved.\n17 * If concerns are not addressed and met, waste profile documentation is not approved until concerns\n18 are corrected.\n19 3.4.1.2.2 Waste Stream Approval for Newly Generated Mixed Waste\n20 The waste stream approval process for wastes generated during IDF operations (except for leachate)\n21 consists of reviewing stream information supplied on a waste stream profile and supporting\n22 documentation. The waste stream profile requires the following supporting documentation:\n23 * Generator information (e.g., name, address, point-of-contact, telephone number)\n24 * Waste stream name\n25 * Waste generating process description\n26 * Waste numbers\n27 * Chemical characterization information (e.g., characterization method(s), chemicals present,\n28 concentration ranges)\n29 * Designation information\n30 * LDR information including identification of underlying hazardous constituents if applicable\n31 * Waste type information (e.g., physical state, adsorbents used, inert materials, stabilizing agents\n32 used)\n33 * Packaging information (e.g., container type, maximum weight, size).\n34 Attachments could consist of container drawings, process flow information, analytical data, etc.\n35 In some cases, such as variable waste streams, the waste stream profile information could be general in\n36 nature. In these cases, more detailed information is gathered during the waste shipment approval process\n37 on a per shipment basis. This information is reviewed against the TSD unit waste acceptance criteria to\n38 ensure the waste is acceptable for receipt. If conformance issues are found during this review, additional\n39 information is requested that could include analytical data or a sample to be analyzed.\n40 If the waste cannot be received, the TSD unit pursues acceptance of the waste at an alternate TSD unit.\n41 Once the waste meets the waste acceptance criteria, the TSD unit assigns the profile to a waste\n42 specification record and establishes a waste verification frequency based on the requirements found in\n43 Section 3.4.2. Profile information is re-evaluated as discussed in Section 3.4.7.\nChapter 3.13\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 3.4.1.3 Waste Transfer/Shipment Approval Process\n2 After the appropriate generator has received the waste profile documentation approval from IDF (refer to\n3 Section 3.4.1.2.1), the generator waste transfer will be subjected to the waste transfer approval process.\n4 Only those ILAW and BVW containers approved under the waste profile documentation as part of the\n5 waste transfer approval process will be transferred to the IDF. During the waste transfer approval\n6 process, the IDF designated waste acceptance organization will obtain the following information.\n7 For each ILAW or BVW container transfer that is a candidate for disposal in the TSD unit, the generator\n8 will provide the following information:\n9 * Container identification number\n10 * Profile number\n11 * Waste description\n12 * Generator information (e.g., name, address, point-of-contact, telephone number)\n13 * Container information (e.g., type, size, weight)\n14 * Waste numbers\n15 * LDR certification\n16 * Packaging materials and quantities\n17 The ILAW and BVW container transfer approval process will be as follows.\n18 1. The generator obtains information from existing database, operating record, or generator records\n19 on each ILAW container to be transferred under the approved waste profile documentation.\n20 2. Information is submitted to the TSD unit designated waste acceptance organization by the\n21 generator and is reviewed for the following:\n22 * Consistency with approved waste profile documentation.\n23 * Consistency with waste acceptance criteria within the IDF.\n24 3. If discrepancies are identified, the TSD unit designated waste acceptance organization will\n25 request additional information from the generator to address any discrepancies.\n26 4. Information (waste package documentation) is resubmitted by the generator addressing concerns\n27 in tem 3.\n28 5. If discrepancies are addressed, this information is forwarded to the TSD waste acceptance\n29 organization.\n30 6. If discrepancies are not addressed, transfer is not approved until discrepancies are corrected.\n31 3.4.1.4 Acceptable Knowledge Requirements\n32 The TSD unit ensures that all information used to make waste management decisions is based on\n33 adequate characterization data as described in the following sections. The TSD unit evaluates the data to\n34 ensure that the data are adequate acceptable knowledge for management of the waste.\n35 3.4.1.4.1 General Acceptable Knowledge Requirements\n36 One or more of the following types of information could be considered, provided that the information is\n37 of sufficient quality to demonstrate compliance with applicable waste acceptance criteria:\n38 * Mass balance from a controlled process that has a specified output for a specified input.\n39 * Material safety data sheet on chemical products.\n40 * Test data from a surrogate sample.\n41 * Analytical data on the waste or a waste from a similar process.\nChapter 3.14\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 In addition, acceptable knowledge requirements can be met using a combination of analytical data or\n2 screening results and one and/or more of the following information:\n3 * Interview information\n4 * Logbooks\n5 * Procurement records\n6 * Qualified analytical data\n7 * Radiation work package\n8 * Procedures and/or methods\n9 * Process flow charts\n10 * Inventory sheets\n11 * Vendor information\n12 * Mass balance from an uncontrolled process (e.g., spill cleanup)\n13 * Mass balance from a process with variable inputs and outputs (e.g., washing/cleaning methods)\n14 If the information is sufficient to quantify the constituents of regulatory concern and to determine waste\n15 characteristics as required by the regulations and TSD unit waste acceptance criteria, the information is\n16 considered acceptable. Adequate acceptable knowledge includes (1) general waste knowledge\n17 requirements and/or (2) LDR waste knowledge requirements.\n18 (1) General waste knowledge requirements. At a minimum, the generator supplies enough information\n19 for the waste to be managed at this TSD unit (refer to Section 3.4.1.1). The minimum level of\n20 acceptable knowledge consists of designation data where the constituents causing a waste number to\n21 be assigned are quantified and that data address any TSD unit operational parameters necessary for\n22 proper management of the waste.\n23 When process knowledge indicates that constituents, which if present in the waste might cause the\n24 waste to be regulated, are input to a process, but not expected to be in the waste, sampling and\n25 analysis must be performed to ensure the constituents do not appear in the waste above applicable\n26 regulatory levels. This requirement can be met through chemical screening. This sampling and\n27 analysis are required only for initial characterization of the waste stream.\n28 When the available information does not qualify as acceptable knowledge or is not sufficient to\n29 characterize a waste for management, the sampling and testing methods outlined in\n30 WAC 173-303-110 are used to determine whether a waste designates as ignitable, corrosive, reactive,\n31 and/or toxic and whether the waste contains free liquids as applicable. If the analysis is performed to\n32 complete characterization after acceptance of the waste by the TSD unit, this WAP governs the\n33 sampling and testing requirements.\n34 (2) LDR waste knowledge. The TSD unit operating record contains all information required to\n35 document that the appropriate treatment standards have been met or will be met after the waste is\n36 treated unless otherwise excepted in this section.\n37 * Both ILAW and BVW will be LDR compliant waste streams prior to acceptance at the IDF.\n38 Vitrification at the WTP and DBVS will facilitate LDR compliance for the majority of the\n39 mixed waste disposed of at IDF. IDF operational waste will be treated as needed to meet\n40 LDR at another TSD other than WTP or the DBVS\n41 * This TSD unit may use analytical data as necessary to ensure that the applicable requirements\n42 found in 40 CFR 268.7 and WAC 173-303-140(4) are met.\nChapter 3.15\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 3.4.1.4.2 Methodology to Ensure Compliance with LDR Requirements\n2 The generators are subject to LDR requirements and are required to submit all information notifications\n3 and certifications described in WAC 173-303-380(1), (j), (k), (n), and (o). Mixed waste not meeting the\n4 treatment standards cannot be disposed at this TSD unit.\n5 The following are general requirements for certification or information notification.\n6 * The waste is subject to LDR and the waste has been treated. The generator supplies the\n7 appropriate LDR certification information (40 CFR 268).\n8 * The waste is subject to LDR and the generator has determined that the waste meets the LDR as\n9 generated. The generator develops the certification based on process knowledge and/or analytical\n10 data and supplies the appropriate LDR certification information necessary to demonstrate\n11 compliance with the LDR treatment standards of 40 CFR 268 and WAC 173-303-140. State-only\n12 LDRs do not require this type of certification.\n13 When demonstrating that a concentration-based LDR treatment standard has been met, a representative\n14 sample of the waste must be submitted for analysis. This sample could be taken by the treatment facility\n15 or the generator and is required to comply with the LDR treatment standards contained in 40 CFR 268.40\n16 and 268.48 for underlining hazardous constituents.\n17 3.4.2 Verification\n18 Verification is an assessment performed by this TSD unit to substantiate that the waste received is the\n19 same as represented by the analysis supplied by the generator for the pre-shipment review. Verification\n20 for ILAW and BVW containers will contain one element, a 100% container receipt inspection.\n21 Physical/chemical screening will not be performed on the ILAW or BVW containers. Waste is not\n22 accepted by the TSD unit for disposal until the required elements of verification have been completed,\n23 including evaluation of any data obtained from verification activities. All conformance issues identified\n24 during the verification process are resolved in accordance with Section 3.4.3. Verification activity results\n25 will be documented by the IDF designated waste acceptance organization.\n26 Sampling and analysis for non-vitrification mixed waste (e.g., treatment residues from treatment of IDF\n27 leachate that are returned to IDF for disposal) will not occur at the IDF but will occur at another permitted\n28 TSD.\n29 3.4.2.1 Container Receipt Inspection\n30 Container receipt inspection is a mandatory element of the confirmation process.\n31 3.4.2.1.1 Container Receipt Inspection for ILAW and BVW\n32 The ILAW and BVW container receipt inspection will be performed by IDF designated waste acceptance\n33 organization. The following criteria will be evaluated during container receipt inspection:\n34 * Number of containers\n35 * Size of containers\n36 * Labels\n37 * Container integrity\n38 Discrepancies identified during the container receipt inspection will be communicated to generator.\n39 Discrepancies will be resolved before the containers are unloaded. Once the discrepancies are resolved,\n40 the ILAW containers will be unloaded and disposed. Should discrepancies remain unresolved after\n41 30 days, Ecology will be notified and daily walk around inspections conducted.\n42 3.4.2.2 Physical Screening Process\n43 The ILAW and BVW containers are not required to be physically screened because the generator verifies\n44 the waste meet the waste acceptance criteria for IDF.\nChapter 3.16\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 3.4.2.3 Chemical Screening Process\n2 Chemical screening is a verification element for containerized mixed waste. The ILAW and BVW\n3 containers are not required to be chemically screened because the generator verifies the waste meet the\n4 waste acceptance criteria for IDF.\n5 3.4.3 Waste Acceptance\n6 Initial acceptance of waste occurs only after the confirmation process described in Section 3.4 is\n7 complete. Conformance issues identified during the confirmation process are documented and managed\n8 in accordance with Section 3.4.1.2.2. Conformance issues that must be corrected before waste acceptance\n9 include the following:\n10 * Waste that is not identified in the Part A, Form 3 (Chapter 1.0).\n11 * Waste does not match approved profile documentation.\n12 * Designation, physical, and/or chemical characterization discrepancy.\n13 * Incorrect LDR paperwork.\n14 * Packaging discrepancy.\n15 * Manifest discrepancies as described in WAC 173-303-370(4).\n16 For waste shipments with unresolved conformance issue(s) that exceed 90 days, this TSD will notify\n17 Ecology at least once per calendar quarter.\nChapter 3.17\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nPre-transfer review\nwaste Is\nVitrified low Generator profile Yes waste transfer Yes Transfer\nactivity waste is contacts documentation approval of\ngenerated IDFWAO process process low\ncompleted completed\nNo No\nTransfe~r not\ninitiated\n,,Verification\nReceive waste at IDF Are Yes Dispose of\nand perform discrepancies Unload vitrified low\ncontainer inspection resolved activity waste\n? in IDF\nNo\nReject\ntransfer\nIDF = integrated Disposal Facility\nIDFWAO = IDF Wiaste Acceptnce Organization\nFigure 2. Vitrification or Alternative Method Transfer and Waste Analysis Plan\n2 Process Flow Diagram\nChapter 3.18\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 3.4.4 Selecting Waste Analysis Parameters\n2 The ILAW and BVW containers will be managed without the need to perform sampling and analysis at\n3 the TSD. No parameters will be required to be identified.\n4\n5 Table 2. Parameters and Rationale for Physical Screening\nParameter Method* Rationale for selection\nNondestructive examination Field method Confirm consistency between waste\nand shipping documentation.\n*Procedures based on manufacturer's recommended methodology unless otherwise noted. When regulations\nrequire a specific method, the method is followed.\nSW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, latest edition, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,\nWashington, D.C.\nWAC 173-303, \"Dangerous Waste Regulations\n6\n7 3.4.5 Selecting Sampling Procedures\n8 Any required sampling and analysis of the ILAW and BVW containers will be performed at the generator\n9 before the containers are closed. Sampling and analysis for IDF operational mixed waste will not occur at\n10 the IDF but at another Hanford TSD.\n11 3.4.6 Selecting A Laboratory, Laboratory Testing, and Analytical Methods\n12 Any required sampling and analysis of the ILAW and BVW containers will be performed before the\n13 containers are closed at the RPP-WTP and DBVS respectively. No Laboratory, laboratory testing or\n14 analytical methods will be required to be identified.\n15 3.4.7 Selecting Waste Re-Evaluation Frequencies\n16 The re-evaluation (repeat and review) frequency for ILAW to review a waste generating process and\n17 associated waste profile documentation is every two years, or more often if conditions in\n18 WAC 173-303-300(4)(a) arise. Since BVW will be generated over a shorter time period, frequency for\n19 review will be every six months.\n20 When a waste generating process and associated waste profile documentation is re-evaluated, IDF\n21 personnel or designated waste acceptance organization could request the generator to do one or more of\n22 the following:\n23 * Verify the current waste profile documentation is accurate.\n24 * Supply new waste profile documentation.\n25 When a waste profile is re-evaluated, the TSD unit could request the organization generating the waste to\n26 do one of the following:\n27 * Verify the current waste profile is accurate.\n28 * Supply a new waste profile.\n29 * Submit a sample for parameter analysis.\n30 3.4.8 Special Waste Analysis Procedural Requirements\n31 Special procedural requirements for the IDF will include procedures for ignitable, reactive, and\n32 incompatible waste, and provisions for complying with federal and state LDR requirements. This section\n33 discusses any special process requirements for receiving mixed waste at this TSD unit.\nChapter 3.19\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 3.4.9 Procedures for Ignitable, Reactive, and Incompatible Waste\n2 Waste stream compatibility (i.e., compatibility between individual waste streams and compatibility\n3 between waste streams and landfill design and construction parameters) and waste stream ignitability will\n4 be assessed on a case-by-case basis. Criteria for assessing and determining compatibility and ignitability\n5 will be identified in either the facility Waste Acceptance Criteria, Waste Analysis Plan, or other protocol\n6 or procedure as appropriate. Should these wastes be accepted, appropriate administrative and engineering\n7 controls will be implemented as necessary.\n8 This TSD unit does not accept reactive waste (refer to Section 3.2 and Section 3.4.1.1). The TSD unit\n9 ensures that reactive waste is not accepted at this TSD unit in the following manner.\n10 * Pre-shipment review will identify whether the waste is reactive based on the definition contained\n11 in WAC 173-303-040.\n12 * If analysis of the characterization information leads to a conclusion that the waste is a reactive\n13 waste, the containers, or waste will not be accepted.\n14 The types of prohibited waste not accepted at this TSD unit as listed in Section 3.2.\n15 3.4.10 Provisions for Complying With Federal and State Land Disposal Restriction\n16 Requirements\n17 State-only and federal LDR requirements restrict the land disposal of certain types of waste subject to\n18 RCRA and RCW 70.105, \"Hazardous Waste Management\", as amended. Waste managed on the Hanford\n19 Facility falls within the purview of these LDRs per 40 CFR 268 and WAC 173-303-140. The treatment\n20 standards for mixed waste disposed at IDF are based on the dangerous waste numbers accepted as\n21 documented on the IDF Part A as well as additional information necessary for identifying treatability\n22 groups etc.\n23 The IDF will not perform sampling and analysis to determine compliance with treatment standards\n24 contained in 40 CFR 268. Any sampling and analysis results required to demonstrate compliance with\n25 concentration-based treatment standards contained in 40 CFR 268.40 will be obtained by IDF waste\n26 acceptance organization from the generator, during the waste profile documentation process to meet the\n27 requirements of 40 CFR 268.7(c)(2). Sampling and analysis results will be placed into the unit-specific\n28 portion of the Hanford Facility operating record. Other LDR records are identified in\n29 WAC 173-303-380(1)(m) and will be obtained from the generator, by IDF personnel as part of either the\n30 waste profile documentation process or the waste transfer approval process. The treated waste must meet\n31 all applicable LDRs to be accepted for disposal at the IDF. IDF will obtain the LDR certification from\n32 the treatment unit.\n33 Mixed waste constituents that are subject to LDRs are identified in 40 CFR 268.40 by reference in\n34 WAC 173-303-140(2), the extremely hazardous waste disposal requirements for DOE facilities contained\n35 in RCW 70.105.050(2), and the state-only LDRs contained in WAC 173-303-140(4)(b)-(d). The mixed\n36 waste must meet certain treatment standards, as specified in 40 CFR 268.40, RCW 70.105.050(2), and\n37 WAC 173-303-140(4)(b)-(d), if the waste is to be land disposed. Any waste requiring LDR treatment\n38 must be treated prior to acceptance into the IDF.\n39 State-only LDRs for mixed waste will be met in the following manner:\n40 * Extremely hazardous waste disposal requirements in RCW 70.105.050(2) concerning \"all\n41 reasonable methods\" will be met by the treatment performed to meet 40 CFR 268,\n42 WAC 173-303-140(4)(b)-(d), and DOE requirements for disposal. If no treatment is required to\n43 meet 40 CFR 268, WAC 173-303-140(4)(b)-(d), or DOE requirements, no treatment is required\n44 to dispose of extremely hazardous waste at the IDF.\n45 * Special requirements for bulk and containerized liquids in WAC 173-303-140(4)(b) are identical\n46 to the landfill requirements contained in 40 CFR 264.314.\nChapter 3.20\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI For mixed waste, including the provisions when to perform the paint filter test, these\n2 requirements are described in Section 3.2 of the WAP.\n3 * Solid acid waste requirements in WAC 173-303-140(4)(c) can be met through knowledge of the\n4 treatment process. Sampling and analysis following treatment is not required to meet this state-\n5 only LDR. Disposal of treated solid acid waste still displaying the WSC2 characteristic can\n6 occur only when the waste is treated to reduce the harmful properties or characteristics of the\n7 waste.\n8 * Organic/Carbonaceous waste prohibition requirements in WAC 173-303-140(4)(d) do not apply\n9 to the Hanford Facility because the Hanford Facility is operating under\n10 WAC 173-303-140(4)(d)(iii), in accordance with a sitewide 1,609 kilometers (1,000-mile)\n11 inapplicability certification. Sampling and analysis is not required to determine the\n12 organic/carbonaceous content of a mixed waste.\n13 * Ecology allows treatment of Organic/Carbonaceous waste in lieu of meeting the inapplicability\n14 certification requirements WAC-173-303-140(4)(d)(iii) through macro-encapsulation for\n15 hazardous debris only.\n16 3.4.11 Off-Specification Waste\n17 Off-Specification ILAW or BVW is waste not meeting the waste acceptance criteria as described in\n18 Section 3.4, Confirmation Process. ILAW or BVW streams determined to be off-specification may be\n19 temporarily stored in the RCRA lined portion of the IDF pending resolution of discrepancy or return to\n20 generating TSD as long as these wastes meet LDR. ILAW and BVW may be temporarily stored in the\n21 RCRA lined portion of the IDF, provided the temperature administrative control limit is not exceeded,\n22 until sufficiently cool for disposal.\n23 3.5 Waste Tracking\n24 The IDF will monitor and record the placement of waste packages. At the time of final placement of each\n25 package, the position and serial number of the package will be logged.\n26 3.6 Recordkeeping\n27 Recordkeeping requirements that will be applicable to this WAP are as follows:\n28 * Confirmation records described in Section 3.4 will be maintained in accordance with\n29 Condition II.I.1.b of the Hanford Facility RCRA Permit, Dangerous Waste Portion (Ecology\n30 2001).\n31 * Waste profile documentation described in Section 3.4.1.2.1 will be maintained in accordance with\n32 Condition II.l.1 j of the Hanford Facility RCRA Permit, Dangerous Waste Portion.\n33 * LDR records described in Section 3.4.10 will be maintained in accordance with\n34 WAC 173-303-380(1)(m) in the IDF unit-specific portion of the Hanford Facility operating\n35 record.\n36 3.7 References\n37 Ecology, 2001, \"Hanford Facility RCRA Permit, Dangerous Waste Portion\", Washington State\n38 Department of Ecology, Olympia, Washington as amended.\n39 SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Method, latest edition, Office of\n40 Solid Waste, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.\n41 WHC-SD-WM-TI-714, High-Density Polyethylene Liner Chemical Compatibility for Radioactive Mixed\n42 Waste Trenches, 1995, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.\n43\nChapter 3.21\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nChapter 3.22\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nCHAPTER 4.0\nPROCESS INFORMATION\nChapter 4.i\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nChapter 4.ii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2 CHAPTER 4.0\n3 PROCESS INFORMATION\n4\n5 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n6 4.0 PROCESS INFORMATION .................................... ......4.5\n7 4.1 Containers ....................................................... 4.5\n8 4.1.1 Description of Containers.............................................4.5\n9 4.2 Leachate Collection Tanks............................................4.6\n10 4.3 Landfills........................................................4.6\n11 4.3.1 List of Wastes....................................................4.6\n12 4.3.2 Liner System Exemption Requests.......................................4.7\n13 4.3.3 Liner System, General Items ................................. ................. 4.7\n14 4.3.3.1 Liner System Description.............................................4.7\n15 4.3.3.2 Liner System Location Relative to High Water Table.............. ........... 4.10\n16 4.3.3.3 Loads on Liner System.............................................4.10\n17 4.3.3.4 Liner System Coverage.............................................4.12\n18 4.3.3.5 Liner System Exposure Prevention......................................4.12\n19 4.3.4 Liner System, Foundation.............................................4.13\n20 4.3.4.1 Foundation Description.............................................4.13\n21 4.3.4.2 Subsurface Exploration Data......................... ................. 4.13\n22 4.3.4.3 Laboratory Testing Data.................................................4.13\n23 4.3.4.4 Engineering Analyses..............................................4.13\n24 4.3.5 Liner System, Liners...............................................4.15\n25 4.3.5.1 Synthetic Liners..................................................4.15\n26 4.3.5.2 Synthetic Liner Compatibility Data...................... ............... 4.15\n27 4.3.5.3 Synthetic Liner Strength............................................4.15\n28 4.3.5.4 Synthetic Liner Bedding.............................................4.16\n29 4.3.5.5 Soil Liners.......................................................4.16\n30 4.3.6 Liner System, Leachate Collection and Removal System .......... ...................... 4.17\n31 4.3.6.1 System Operation and Design..........................................4.18\n32 4.3.6.2 Equivalent Capacity.................................................4.20\n33 4.3.6.3 Grading and Drainage...............................................4.20\n34 4.3.6.4 Maximum Leachate Head.............................................4.20\n35 4.3.6.5 System Compatibility................................................4.20\n36 4.3.6.6 System Strength...................................................4.21\n37 4.3.6.7 Prevention of Clogging..............................................4.21\n38 4.3.7 Liner System, Construction and Maintenance...............................4.21\n39 4.3.7.1 Material Specifications...............................................4.21\n40 4.3.7.2 Construction Specifications............................................4.22\n41 4.3.7.3 Construction Quality Control Program...................................4.23\n42 4.3.7.4 Maintenance Procedures for Leachate Collection and Removal Systems. .................. 4.23\nChapter 4.iii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 4.3.7.5 Liner Repairs during Operations.......................................4.23\n2 4.3.8 Run-On and Runoff Control Systems....................................4.23\n3 4.3.8.1 Run-on Control System .......................... ................... 4.24\n4 4.3.8.2 Runoff Control System..............................................4.24\n5 4.3.8.3 Construction....................................................4.24\n6 4.3.8.4 Maintenance.....................................................4.24\n7 4.3.9 Control of Wind Dispersal...........................................4.24\n8 4.3.10 Liquids in Landfills.................................................4.24\n9 4.3.11 Containerized Waste...............................................4.24\n10\n11 Appendices\n12 4A DESIGN REPORT -CRITICAL SYSTEMS....................................4A-i\n13 4B CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN............... ............. 4B-i\n14 4C RESPONSE ACTION PLAN.......................... .................. 4C-i\n15 4D 9090A TEST RESULTS...............................................4D34\n16\n17 Figures\n18 Figure 4.1. Integrated Disposal Facility Lined Landfill................... ............. 4.25\n19 Figure 4.2. Example of a Typical Liner................................. ................ 4.26\n20\nChapter 4.iv\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 4.0 PROCESS INFORMATION\n2 This chapter discusses the processes that will be used to dispose waste in the IDF and includes a\n3 discussion of the design and function of the following:\n4 * Container\n5 * Disposal landfill\n6 * Leak detection system\n7 * Leachate collection and removal system\n8 * Secondary leak detection system\n9 Note that the SLDS is not a design requirement of WAC 173-303-665, however DOE is adding the design\n10 feature pursuant to its authority under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (AEA) and not for the purposes of\n11 compliance with the dangerous waste regulations. Therefore, information regarding the design,\n12 construction, and operation of the secondary leak detection system is provided in this application as\n13 information only. Pursuant to AEA, DOE has sole and exclusive responsibility and authority to regulate\n14 the source, special nuclear and by-product material component of radioactive mixed waste at DOE-owned\n15 nuclear facilities. Source, special nuclear and by-product materials, as defined by AEA, are not subject to\n16 regulation under Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) or the Hazardous Waste Management\n17 Act, by the State of Washington and are not be subject to State dangerous waste permit, orders, or any\n18 other enforceable instrument issued there under. DOE recognizes that radionuclide data may be useful in\n19 the development and confirmation of geohydrologic conceptual models. Radionuclide data contained\n20 herein is therefore provided as a matter of comity so the information may be used for such purposes.\n21 Waste stream compatibility (i.e., compatibility between individual waste streams and compatibility\n22 between waste streams and landfill design and construction parameters) will be assessed on a case-by-\n23 case basis. Criteria for assessing and determining compatibility is identified in the Waste Acceptance\n24 Criteria, Waste Analysis Plan, or other protocol or procedure as appropriate (Chapter 3.0, for further\n25 discussion of waste stream compatibility).\n26 Process Code SO1 (container storage) has been included within this permit, in the event that storage is\n27 required before final disposal (e.g., to support the confirmation process of the waste or cooling of vitrified\n28 waste if required). Waste failing the confirmation process (Chapter 3.0) will be identified as off-\n29 specification and may require storage prior to disposal. Only off-specification waste or vitrified waste\n30 requiring cooling (due to process heat) may be stored in the lined portion of the IDF pending disposition.\n31 To maintain operational flexibility, off-specification containers and vitrified waste requiring cooling\n32 could be left on the transport vehicles at the IDF until disposal can occur but may be off-loaded into the\n33 lined portion of the IDF pending final disposal provided the temperature administrative control limit is\n34 not exceeded. Off-specification waste and vitrified waste requiring cooling will be separated from other\n35 waste via tape, ropes, chains, or other cordon mechanism.\n36 4.1 Containers\n37 All mixed waste accepted for disposal at the IDF will be packaged in standard containers\n38 [U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and/or DOE], unless alternate packages are dictated by the\n39 size, shape, or form of waste (49 CFR 173) (e.g., metal boxes), and self-contained bulk waste.\n40 4.1.1 Description of Containers\n41 Mixed waste disposed at the IDF is limited to vitrified low-activity waste (LAW) from the RPP-WTP and\n42 DBVS. Additionally, mixed waste generated by IDF operations will be disposed of in IDF.\n43 The RPP-WTP and DBVS containers are designed specifically for the vitrified low activity waste form.\n44 Nominal RPP-WTP container dimensions will be 122 centimeters base outside dimension,\n45 107 centimeters top by 230 centimeters in length, with a wall thickness of 0.357 centimeter with a\n46 container volume of 2.55 cubic meters.\nChapter 4.5\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The DBVS container dimensions are approximately 2.4 meters wide by 3.1 meters tall and 7.3 meters\n2 long and a container volume of 54 cubic meters. The vitrified low activity waste will be compatible with\n3 the containers, stainless steel for RPP-WTP and carbon steel for DBVS. Before receipt at the IDF,\n4 containers will be closed by the generator.\n5 Due to the radioactivity and remote handling of the RPP-WTP immobilized waste containers,\n6 conventional labeling of the vitrified immobilized waste containers will not be feasible and an alternative\n7 to the standard labeling requirements will be used. This alternative labeling approach will use a unique\n8 alphanumeric identifier that will be welded onto each immobilized glass waste container. The welded\n9 \"identifier\" will ensure that the number is always legible, will not be removed or damaged during\n10 container decontamination, will not be damaged by heat or radiation, and will not degrade over time.\n11 The identifier will be welded onto the shoulder and sidewall of each immobilized glass container at two\n12 locations 180 degrees apart. Characters will be approximately 2 in. high by 1.5 in. wide. The identifier\n13 will be formed by welding on stainless steel filler material at the time of container construction. This\n14 identifier will be used to track the container from receipt at the RPP-WTP, throughout its subsequent path\n15 of shipment and disposal at the IDF.\n16 Each identifier will be composed of unique coded alphanumeric characters. This unique alphanumeric\n17 identification will be maintained within the plant information network, and will list data pertaining to the\n18 waste container including waste numbers, and the major risk(s) associated with the waste.\n19 Mixed waste generated through waste operations at IDF will be packaged based on the size of the waste,\n20 with the most common container being galvanized or aluminized 208-liter containers.\n21 The container packaging and handling for the IDF are designed to maintain containment of the waste,\n22 limit storage intrusion, and limit human exposure to mixed waste. Unusual sized containers such as\n23 vitrified LAW packages will be handled by using cranes or other appropriate equipment.\n24 Operations personnel will inspect each container to confirm appropriate documentation and compliance\n25 with the waste acceptance criteria before the container is placed in the IDF (refer to Chapter 3).\n26 If containerized mixed waste must be opened (i.e., for confirmation sampling, repackaging, etc.), the\n27 container typically would be removed to an onsite treatment and/or storage unit or other approved\n28 location before being opened. The container would be sealed before being returned to the IDF.\n29 4.2 Leachate Collection Tanks\n30 The aboveground leachate collection tank supports the lined IDF landfill. The leachate collection tank\n31 will be operated in accordance with the generator provisions of WAC 173-303-200 and\n32 WAC 173-303-640 as referenced by WAC 173-303-200.\n33 For informational purposes, the following is provided for an understanding of the operation of the\n34 Leachate Collection Tank. Procedures will be written to manage the leachate in accordance with\n35 WAC 173-303-200. The presence of leachate in the tank will be detected with instrumentation within the\n36 two stilling wells. The level instrument within the first stilling well monitors the depth of leachate in the\n37 tank. A second stilling well will have instrumentation for high-high and low-low alarm set-point trips.\n38 The leachate will be removed from the tank using a transfer pump.\n39 4.3 Landfills\n40 The following addresses the IDF lined landfill.\n41 4.3.1 List of Wastes\n42 IDF will receive mixed and/or dangerous waste.\n43 Waste will be accepted in containers (e.g. drums, boxes, larger containers).\n44 Waste streams acceptable at the IDF facility fall within the range of dangerous waste numbers identified\n45 in Chapter 1.0, Part A Form.\nChapter 4.6\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 4.3.2 Liner System Exemption Requests\n2 This permit documentation does not seek an exemption to liner system requirements.\n3 4.3.3 Liner System, General Items\n4 This section provides a general description of the liner system to be used for the IDF lined landfill.\n5 The liner system was designed to prevent migration of leachate out of the lined landfill during the active\n6 life of the landfill. The Active Life will consist of the operational period and the closure/postclosure\n7 period. The liner system was designed to meet U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)\n8 requirements, as identified in RCRA Subtitle C requirements for hazardous waste disposal facilities\n9 (40 CFR 264), technical guidance documents (e.g., EPA 1985), and WAC-173-303-665. In addition, the\n10 liner system incorporates the following general functional requirements:\n11 * Range of Operating Conditions--year-round operation, withstand construction, and long-term\n12 stresses.\n13 * Degree of Reliability--function safely and effectively throughout operating and\n14 closure/postclosure period with minimum maintenance.\n15 * Intended Life--operational phase plus closure/postclosure monitoring phase.\n16 4.3.3.1 Liner System Description\n17 The landfill liner system will comply with WAC 173-303-665 requirements for dangerous waste landfills.\n18 Figure 4.2 shows a typical design and includes the following components (from top to bottom).\n19 * Operations layer: minimum 0.9-meter thick of native soil. This layer provides a working surface\n20 for equipment, protect the liner from mechanical damage, and prevent freezing of the underlying\n21 low-hydraulic conductivity soil layer. (Hydraulic conductivity is a measure of how rapidly a\n22 material can transmit water and is based on specific ASTM testing requirements.)\n23 * Leachate collection and removal system (LCRS) contains a minimum 0.3-meter-thick drainage\n24 gravel layer with a hydraulic conductivity of at least 1 x 10-2 centimeter per second (sometimes\n25 including perforated drainage pipes). A nonwoven separation geotextile is located between the\n26 operations layer and the drainage gravel layer to minimize sediment (fine-soil) migration into the\n27 LCRS. A nonwoven cushion geotextile is located between the drainage gravel and the primary\n28 geomembrane to protect the primary geomembrane.\n29 The LCRS liners collect and convey leachate to the LCRS sump for removal and include the following\n30 components.\n31 * Primary geomembrane liner: this liner consists of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) because of\n32 its excellent resistance to expected chemicals (Chapter 1.0), nominal 60-mil thickness (54-mil\n33 minimum), which is textured (to improve stability against sliding). The geomembrane acts as a\n34 moisture barrier. Located immediately above the primary geomembrane the LCRS includes a\n35 perforated pipe that helps collect and guide water into the leachate collection sump. The\n36 perforated pipe is located along the centerline of the cell and provides high-flow path water to the\n37 primary collection sump.\n38 * Primary geosynthetic clay liner (GCL): the GCL consisting of a high-swelling sodium synthetic\n39 mat containing bentonite with a hydraulic conductivity of 1 x 10' centimeter per second or less.\n40 This layer acts as an additional primary moisture barrier directly under the primary\n41 geomembrane.\n42 The leak detection system (LDS) is similar to the LCRS except the composite drainage net (CDN)\n43 replaces the primary gravel layer, the geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) is placed directly under the secondary\n44 geomembrane liner only under the LDS sump and the perforated pipes are not be needed because very\n45 high flow capacities are not be required.\nChapter 4.7\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI The purpose of this system is to collect any leachate that leaks through the primary liner system and\n2 convey the leachate to the LDS sump for removal. The LDS also serves as a secondary LCRS. The LDS\n3 liners will collect and convey leakage to the LDS sump and include the following components:\n4 * Secondary geomembrane liner: same as primary geomembrane liner.\n5 * Secondary geosynthetic clay liner: same as primary geosynthetic clay liner.\n6 * Admix liner: a minimum 0.9-meter-thick layer of compacted soil/bentonite admixture with a\n7 hydraulic conductivity of 1 x 10-7 centimeter per second or less. The bentonite is high-swelling\n8 sodium bentonite. This layer acts as an additional moisture barrier directly under the secondary\n9 geosynthetic clay liner in the LDS sump area and the secondary geomembrane outside the LDS\n10 sump area.\n11 * The secondary leak detection system (SLDS) consists of operations layer type fill for a\n12 foundation of the LDS admix layer, drainage gravel with a hydraulic conductivity of at least I x\n13 10-2 centimeter per second adjacent to a perforated pipe, a composite drainage net (CDN) and\n14 tertiary geomembrane. A nonwoven separation geotextile is located between the operations layer\n15 type material and the drainage gravel to minimize sediment (fine-soil) migration into the SLDS\n16 piping. The purpose of this system is to provide access to the area immediately below the LDS\n17 sump area. The SLDS collects liquids resulting from construction water and potentially, liquid\n18 from other sources. The SLDS liners will convey collected liquids to the SLDS piping for\n19 monitoring and/or removal. (Note that the secondary leak detection system is not a design\n20 requirement of WAC 173-303-665, however DOE is adding the design feature pursuant to its\n21 authority under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (AEA) and not for the purposes of compliance\n22 with the dangerous waste regulations. Therefore, information regarding the design, construction,\n23 and operation of the secondary leak detection system is provided in this application as\n24 information only. Pursuant to AEA, DOE has sole and exclusive responsibility and authority to\n25 regulate the source, special nuclear and by-product material component of radioactive mixed\n26 waste at DOE-owned nuclear facilities. Source, special nuclear and by-product materials, as\n27 defined by AEA, are not subject to regulation under RCRA or the Hazardous Waste Management\n28 Act, by the State of Washington and are not be subject to State dangerous waste permit, orders, or\n29 any other enforceable instrument issued there under. DOE recognizes that radionuclide data may\n30 be useful in the development and confirmation of geohydrologic conceptual models.\n31 Radionuclide data contained herein is therefore provided as a matter of comity so the information\n32 may be used for such purposes).\n33 4.3.3.1.1 Operations Layer\n34 The purpose of the operations layer is to protect the underlying liner components from damage by\n35 equipment during lined landfill construction and operation. This layer also protects the admix layer from\n36 freezing and desiccation cracking.\n37 Previous research and experience has shown that desiccation cracks can occur under geomembrane liners\n38 when either the liner is not in close contact with the compacted admix or when the liner is subjected to\n39 wide temperature fluctuations (Corser and Cranston 1991). The operations layer acts as a weight to keep\n40 the geomembrane in contact with the admix, thereby reducing the potential for water vapor to form in an\n41 underlying airspace. The operations layer also acts as an insulating layer, together with the dead air space\n42 trapped in the underlying drainage layers.\n43 The operations layer material typically consists of onsite granular soil that is reasonably well graded. The\n44 material has a maximum particle size limit of 5.1 centimeters or less, to facilitate protection of the\n45 underlying layers.\n46 4.3.3.1.2 Leachate Collection and Removal System\n47 The LCRS is located below the operations layer and provides a flow path for the leachate flowing into the\n48 LCRS sump.\nChapter 4.8\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Between the operations layer and the underlying drainage gravel, a geotextile layer functions as a filter\n2 separation barrier. The geotextile prevents migration of fine soil and clogging of the drainage gravel. On\n3 the lined landfill floor the drain gravel is a minimum 0.3-meter-thick layer of washed, rounded to\n4 subrounded stone, with a hydraulic conductivity of at least I x 10-2 centimeter per second. In addition, a\n5 perforated high-density polyethylene drainage pipe placed within the drainage gravel accelerates leachate\n6 transport into the LCRS sump during high precipitation events. On the lined landfill floor, the drain\n7 gravel layer is underlain by a geotextile cushion resting on the primary high-density polyethylene\n8 geomembrane. The geotextile provides additional protection for the primary geomembrane on the floor\n9 of the landfill.\n10 On the lined landfill sideslopes, the LCRS has a composite drainage net (CDN) layer composed of a\n11 geonet (which is a network of HDPE strands, interwoven and bonded to form a panel that provides a\n12 drainage pathway for fluids), with a layer of geotextile thermally bonded to each side. This CDN layer\n13 has a transmissivity of at least 3 x 10-' meters squared per second. The CDN is used on the sideslopes to\n14 avoid problems associated with placement of clean granular material on slopes, thereby minimizing the\n15 potential for damaging the underlying liner system.\n16 4.3.3.1.3 Primary Geomembrane Liner\n17 The primary geomembrane liner acts both as an impermeable leachate barrier and as a flow surface,\n18 routing leachate to the primary sump. High-density polyethylene was used because of its high resistance\n19 to chemical deterioration. Generally, textured (roughened) geomembrane is used to maximize shear\n20 strength along adjacent interfaces and to reduce the potential for sliding of the liner system.\n21 4.3.3.1.4 Primary Geosynthetic Clay Liner Layer\n22 A primary geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) consists of a mat of bentonite placed between two geotextiles.\n23 The GCL is installed immediately beneath the primary high-density polyethylene liner on the floor of the\n24 lined landfill only. The purpose of this liner is to provide extra protection in the case of deterioration\n25 (such as stress cracking) of the primary geomembrane where operations will continue for several years.\n26 The.in-place hydraulic conductivity of the GCL is I x 10-' centimeter per second or less, exceeding the\n27 WAC hydraulic conductivity requirement for the secondary soil liners. The upper surface of GCL\n28 provides a smooth uniform surface on which to place the overlying geomembrane liner.\n29 4.3.3.1.5 Leak Detection System\n30 The LDS provides the flow path for leachate flowing into the LDS sump. The following is a description\n31 of the system to be used in the IDF landfill.\n32 The LDS has a CDN drainage layer on the floor, and a CDN drainage layer on the sideslopes. The CDN\n33 consist of a layer of geotextile thermally bonded to each side of the geonet. These materials and their\n34 configuration is similar to the LCRS described in Section 4.3.3.1.2, except for the absence of a drainage\n35 gravel layer and a perforated drainage pipe system on the floor of the lined landfill. The LDS will\n36 channel leachate that penetrates the primary liner system through the CDN into the leak detection sump.\n37 The LDS serves as a secondary LCRS for the IDF. Leachate collected in the secondary sump will be\n38 measured to determine the leakage rate through the primary liner.\n39 4.3.3.1.6 Secondary and Tertiary Geomembrane Liner\n40 The secondary geomembrane liner, located underneath the LDS, is placed directly against the secondary\n41 compacted admix liner, except in the LDS sump area which includes a geosynthetic clay liner between\n42 the secondary geomembrane liner and the secondary compacted admix liner. For information only, the\n43 teriary geomembrane liner for the SLDS is placed directly against subgrade as per Section 4.3.3.1.8. The\n44 secondary and teriary geomembrane liners are similar to the primary geomembrane described in\n45 Section 4.3.3.1.3. The secondary geosynthetic clay liner material is similar to the primary geosynthetic\n46 clay liner described in Section 4.3.3.1.4.\nChapter 4.9\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 4.3.3.1.7 Secondary Admix Liner\n2 The secondary admix liner has a minimum 0.9-meter-thick compacted soil/bentonite admixture located\n3 immediately beneath the secondary high-density polyethylene liner, as required by WAC 173-303-665.\n4 The secondary admix liner typically consists of silty sand from local borrow sources mixed with a\n5 nominal 12 percent sodium bentonite, by dry weight. The in-place hydraulic conductivity of the admix\n6 liner is 1 x 10' centimeter per second or less, consistent with WAC requirements for secondary soil\n7 liners. The upper surface of the secondary admix liner is trimmed to the design grades and tolerances.\n8 The surface was rolled with a smooth steel-drum roller to remove all ridges and irregularities. The result\n9 is a smooth uniform surface on which to place the overlying geomembrane liner.\n10 4.3.3.1.8 Subgrade/Liner System Foundation\n11 The lined landfill in the IDF is founded in undisturbed native soils or material compacted to at least 95%\n12 of a standard proctor maximum density (determined by ASTM D698). The liner system foundation is\n13 discussed in further detail in Section 4.3.4.\n14 4.3.3.1.9 Access Ramp\n15 The lined landfill has an access ramp outside the lined portion of the landfill, minimizing damage to the\n16 liner system from vehicle traffic into the lined landfill. As the landfill expands the access ramp will be\n17 reconstructed to the south of each expansion in the landfill. The access ramp design could vary as the\n18 landfill expands.\n19 4.3.3.1.10 Landfill Expansion\n20 The initial phase of the IDF liner was complete at the north end of the landfill. As shown in Figure 4.1,\n21 construction of the initial IDF phase completed the liner system on the north sideslope and the excavated\n22 portions of the landfill floor, east sideslope, and west sideslope. The dashed line of Figure 4.1 across the\n23 south edge of the landfill floor denotes the southern extent of the landfill liner. The liner system will be\n24 installed to extend approximately 15 meters beyond the estimated toe of slope of the first phase waste\n25 placement. This extension will also allow waste haul vehicles to be staged or unloaded over a lined area.\n26 Termination detail for the south edge of the liner system is found in Appendix 4A, drawing H-2-830840.\n27 The south sideslope of the first phase of IDF is not lined to allow future expansion of the IDF. At the\n28 south end of the cells is a storm water berm/ditch with an infiltration area, which will capture clean runoff\n29 from the unlined south sideslope before it runs onto the lined landfill. The landfill floor slopes up 1%\n30 from north to south to allow adequate leachate collection capacity for a 25-year storm event. Each future\n31 liner construction project will connect to the south edge of the previously constructed liner and operations\n32 systems and extend the disposal area further to the south. With the expansion of the IDF in subsequent\n33 phases, access ramps for the previous phase will be destroyed and new ramps built on the south edge of\n34 the landfill.\n35 4.3.3.2 Liner System Location Relative to High Water Table\n36 The water table is located approximately 90 to 100 meters below the ground surface in the IDF. It is\n37 anticipated that the deepest point of the liner system is no greater than 20 meters below ground surface.\n38 Consequently, the liner systems is at least 69 meters above groundwater. The liner systems will not be\n39 affected by the water table because of this large elevational difference.\n40 4.3.3.3 Loads on Liner System\n41 The liner system experiences several types of stresses during construction, operation, and\n42 closure/postclosure periods. The following sections discuss the types of stress and analytical methods\n43 used to design the IDF liners.\n44 4.3.3.3.1 Liner Stress\n45 The geosynthetic liner components experience some stress particularly during installation and before\n46 placing waste in the lined landfill but also during the entire lifecycle.\nChapter 4.10\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The high-density polyethylene liner is temperature sensitive, expanding, and contracting as liner\n2 temperatures increase and decrease. Thermally induced stresses could develop in the liner if deployment\n3 and anchoring occur just before a significant decrease in the liner temperature. The operations layer is\n4 sufficiently thick to ensure liner stress remains below the yield strain and stress. Administrative\n5 procedures will prevent loading and backfilling of waste exceeding applicable thermal limits due to recent\n6 vitrification processes to avoid potential liner damage.\n7 The drainage gravel has the potential to produce localized stress on the geomembrane liner during gravel\n8 placement with construction equipment. The geotextile cushion placed at the base of the drainage gravel\n9 protects the underlying geomembrane. A puncture analysis was performed to select a sufficiently thick\n10 cushion geotextile. This analysis incorporated expected construction vehicle ground pressures and design\n11 drainage gravel gradation listed in the construction specifications. If required, engineering controls such\n12 as independent foundations will be installed to minimize liner stress involved with large package disposal.\n13 On the landfill sideslopes, tension induced by liner-component load transfer is not anticipated, because\n14 the liner interface effective shear strength angles are higher than the sideslope angles. The liner\n15 component interface strengths were determined by laboratory direct shear tests. Both static and dynamic\n16 stability analyses were performed, using standard methods, design accelerations, and factors of safety.\n17 Stress on the geomembrane in the anchor trench also was evaluated during detailed design. Wind uplift\n18 and thermal expansion and contraction could cause stress in the geomembrane during construction.\n19 However, these stresses are not be a problem, because the stress is relatively low as compared to the\n20 tensile strength of the liner. In addition, these stresses are minimized by using sand bags to control liner\n21 position during liner panel placement and welding, as well as keeping the anchor trench open until the\n22 liner is stabilized with overlaying fill material. Placement of overlaying fill material is controlled to limit\n23 stress buildup in the liner. The stress is not present after construction, because of the weight and\n24 insulating properties of the operations layer.\n25 4.3.3.3.2 Stress Resulting From Operating Equipment\n26 Operations equipment provides a design load case on the IDF liner, which was analyzed as part of the\n27 IDF design (Appendix 4A). The analyses show that the 0.9-meter-thick operations layer dissipates stress\n28 produced by the operating equipment and is sufficient to protect the IDF liner system.\n29 4.3.3.3.3 Stress from Maximum Quantity of Waste, Cover, and Proposed\n30 Closure/Postclosure Land Use\n31 When the lined landfill is full and the cover system is in place, the liner system will experience a static\n32 load from the overlying waste, backfill, and cover materials. No significant increase in stresses on the\n33 liner system is anticipated from closure/postclosure land use. The maximum design load of material\n34 overlying the liner system includes an allowance for the cover system. Analyses include puncture\n35 protection of the geomembrane by the cushion geotextile, and decrease in transmissivity of CDN drainage\n36 layers. Materials were specified based on the ability of the materials to perform adequately under\n37 closure/postclosure loading conditions.\n38 Dynamic stress on the liner system will result primarily from ground accelerations during seismic events.\n39 Both static and dynamic analyses were performed on the subgrade and liner components based on the\n40 finished configuration of the empty landfill. Under closure/postclosure conditions, the waste, backfill,\n41 and cover materials will tend to buttress the liner system, resulting in greater stability relative to the\n42 operational phase. All of the analyses verified adequate stability for the IDF.\n43 4.3.3.3.4 Stresses Resulting From Settlement, Subsidence, or Uplift\n44 The subgrade settlement produced by waste loading essentially will be elastic because of the\n45 coarse-grained, noncohesive, and drained nature of the soil. The subgrade rebounded during the\n46 excavation phase of construction and will settle as the landfill is filled. The compacted admix liner will\n47 consolidate under waste loads. The total settlement will be a combination of the subgrade elastic and the\n48 admix consolidation settlements.\nChapter 4.11\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI These settlements were analyzed with standard methods during detailed design of the lined landfill. In\n2 general, differential settlements will be expected to occur primarily across the lined landfill sideslopes as\n3 the thickness of waste decreases from maximum to zero. The geosynthetic liner components were\n4 analyzed, the anticipated strains likely will not produce any appreciable stresses in the liner system.\n5 The potential for subsidence-induced stress is believed to be negligible based on the following\n6 information:\n7 * The soils underlying the IDF tend to be coarse-grained soils, sands, and gravels, in a relatively\n8 dense configuration that will not be subject to piping effects that could transport soil resulting in\n9 subsidence.\n10 * The groundwater level is deep, at least 69.6 meters below the base of the lined landfill, and will\n11 not affect bearing soils.\n12 * No natural voids, or man-made mining or tunneling has been noted. If the groundwater level was\n13 lowered substantially and consolidation occurred in the aquifer, local site-specific subsidence\n14 would be negligible because of the depth of the groundwater below the lined landfill.\n15 The potential for stresses resulting from uplift on the liner system also is expected to be negligible. The\n16 seasonal groundwater level is very deep, and higher-elevation perched groundwater likely will not\n17 develop because of the absence of aquitards in the coarse-grained Hanford formation underlying the IDF.\n18 The coarse-grained nature of the Hanford formation also promotes rapid, primarily vertical, infiltration,\n19 which means it is unlikely that infiltration from outside the lined landfill boundary would be transported\n20 laterally underneath the landfill liner. Gas pressures similarly are unlikely to develop because of the\n21 absence of any organic material that could generate significant subsurface gas (from organic material\n22 decomposition) and the coarse-grained, highly permeable sands and gravels underlying the landfill.\n23 4.3.3.3.5 Internal and External Pressure Gradients\n24 Pressure gradients across the liner caused by liquids or gases will be expected to be negligible. Internal\n25 pressures due to liquids will be controlled by the leachate collection and removal system. Because\n26 leachate will be removed from the flat 50-foot by 50-foot LCRS sump in a timely manner, there will be\n27 minimal liquid head on the liner (less than 30.5 centimeters according to WAC regulations). Gas\n28 generated internally is expected to be minimal because waste is inorganic and non-reactive. However,\n29 any pre-closure internally generated gas will be vented through either the waste or the leachate collection\n30 system. The closure cover design will consider gas venting.\n31 External pressures on the liner system is expected to be minimal. Gas pressures will be negligible\n32 because the subgrade soil contains no gas producing materials and is highly permeable, readily venting\n33 any potential gas to the atmosphere. External pressure from liquids is not anticipated because of the deep\n34 groundwater table and the highly permeable foundation soils.\n35 4.3.3.4 Liner System Coverage\n36 The liner system covers all soils underlying the lined landfill and extends over the crest of the sideslopes\n37 into the anchor trench (Figure 4.2, Detail 3).\n38 4.3.3.5 Liner System Exposure Prevention\n39 No geosynthetic or admix components of the liner system are exposed to the atmosphere. The minimum\n40 0.9-meter-thick operations layer covers the entire lined landfill surface. This layer serves both as a\n41 physical protective barrier and as thermal insulation, protecting the admix layer from desiccation and frost\n42 damage.\n43 Excessive erosion, such as gullying, will be repaired by replacing the eroded soil. Dust suppression\n44 agents will be used to prevent excessive wind erosion on the landfill sideslopes. The dust suppression\n45 agents will bind the surface of the operations layer and will minimize wind entrainment of soil.\nChapter 4.12\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 4.3.4 Liner System, Foundation\n2 The following sections discuss the foundations beneath the liner systems.\n3 4.3.4.1 Foundation Description\n4 At the IDF, the Hanford formation consists mainly of sand dominated facies with lesser amounts of silt\n5 dominated and gravel dominated facies. Where sands are present, these sands are underlain by the\n6 Hanford formation. Here, the Hanford formation has been described as poorly sorted pebble to boulder\n7 gravel and fine to course grained sand, with lesser amounts of interstitial and interbedded silt and clay.\n8 The two geologic units pertinent to the IDF lined landfill are summarized as follows.\n9 Recent eolian sand: The sand is light olive gray in color and has a density that is loose at the surface but\n10 becomes compact with depth. The sand has a fine to medium grain size and includes little to some\n11 nonplastic silt-sized fines. The deposit is homogeneous except for a distinguishable layer of volcanic ash\n12 in some locations.\n13 Glaciofluvial flood deposit: This deposit has well graded mixtures of sands and gravels with trace to little\n14 nonplastic silt-sized particles. The gravel content can vary with depth, and the deposit can become\n15 predominantly gravel. This coarse-grained deposit is part of the Cold Creek Bar, which was formed\n16 during the Pleistocene Epoch by glacial outburst flooding.\n17 4.3.4.2 Subsurface Exploration Data\n18 Geological site investigations were used to support the detailed design of the landfill. The investigations\n19 consisted of a review of historical data, including well logs (Chapter 5.0), exploratory borings, and\n20 surface pit samples data. Because the foundation soils are relatively consistent over broad areas, the need\n21 for additional borings and geophysical investigations will be determined on a case-by-case basis. If\n22 boreholes are drilled, penetration test data will be collected to determine the strength of the foundation\n23 materials in situ.\n24 4.3.4.3 Laboratory Testing Data\n25 Laboratory testing will be performed on the surface soil samples and borings, both from the lined landfill\n26 site and from potential borrow source locations as follows. Testing will be performed to classify soils,\n27 provide input parameters to verify engineering analyses, and for preparing material and construction\n28 specifications. The following tests will be performed on the soil samples:\n29 * Visual classification (ASTM D2487)--to classify soils\n30 * Natural moisture content (ASTM D2216)--for input to engineering analyses and preparing\n31 construction specifications\n32 * Particle size analysis (ASTM D422 or D1 140/C136)--for classification and input to engineering\n33 analyses\n34 * Moisture-density relationships (ASTM D698 or D1557)--for preparing compaction specifications\n35 Laboratory testing will be performed according to the most recent versions of ASTM methods or other\n36 recognized standards. Additional tests will be performed as needed.\n37 4.3.4.4 Engineering Analyses\n38 The subgrade will be required to support the liner system and overlying materials (waste, fill, and cover)\n39 without excessive settlement, compression, or uplift that could damage the liner system. This section\n40 describes the design approach used to satisfy these criteria.\n41 4.3.4.4.1 Settlement Potential\n42 The subgrade settlement produced by waste loading essentially will be elastic because of the\n43 coarse-grained, noncohesive, and drained nature of the soil. The subgrade will rebound during the\n44 excavation phase of construction and will settle as the landfill is filled.\nChapter 4.13\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI An elastic settlement analysis using standard methods was performed and results indicate the magnitude\n2 of the total and differential settlement is within performance limits.\n3 4.3.4.4.2 Bearing Capacity\n4 The bearing capacity of the subgrade soil will need to support structures such as leachate collection tanks.\n5 The construction specifications typically will require that the upper portion of the subgrade soil and all\n6 structural fill be moisture conditioned and compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum standard\n7 Proctor dry density (ASTM D698). Maximum allowable bearing capacities for foundations have been\n8 established using standard geotechnical methods. Bearing capacities for the types of soils expected at the\n9 IDF typically are greater than the maximum expected loads from the support structures.\n10 4.3.4.4.3 Stability of Lined Landfill Slopes\n11 The lined landfill was constructed in eolian sand and the underlying coarse-grained Hanford formation.\n12 In granular, cohesionless, and drained soils such as these, the stability of the slope will be related\n13 primarily to the maximum slope angle. Both veneer and global stability analyses were performed to\n14 determine both static and dynamic sideslope stability. Results demonstrate adequate stability for the IDF\n15 throughout its design life.\n16 4.3.4.4.4 Potential for Excess Hydrostatic or Gas Pressures\n17 Because the seasonal high-water level is at least 69 meters below the base of the deepest lined landfill, no\n18 external hydrostatic pressure will be expected from this source. Because of the coarse-grained nature of\n19 the foundation soils, any infiltration of surface water around the perimeter of the lined landfill will be\n20 expected to travel primarily downward. Therefore, infiltration should not cause substantial pressure on\n21 the exterior of the liner system. Internal hydrostatic pressure from leachate will be negligible because the\n22 leachate will be removed from the lined landfill to limit head on the liner.\n23 Gas pressure exerted externally on the liner system is expected to be negligible, because no\n24 gas-generating material (i.e., organic material) is expected in the foundation soils. If any gas were\n25 generated below the liner system, little pressure buildup would occur because of the unsaturated\n26 coarse-grained nature of the foundation soils, which would vent the gas to the atmosphere. Internal gas\n27 pressure buildup will not be anticipated, because wastes are generally inorganic and have low gas\n28 generating potential, and the leachate collection system will be vented to the atmosphere and dissipates\n29 any gas.\n30 4.3.4.4.5 Seismic Conditions\n31 Potential hazards from seismic events will include faulting, slope failure, and liquefaction. Disruption of\n32 the lined landfill by faulting is not considered a significant risk because (1) no major faults have been\n33 identified at the IDF (DOE/RW-0 164) and (2) only one central fault at Gable Mountain on the Hanford\n34 Site shows evidence of movement within the last 13,000 years. The potential for slope failure is\n35 considered low, because granular materials typically have high strengths relative to the maximum\n36 sideslope angles expected for the lined landfill. Liquefaction will occur in loose, poorly graded granular\n37 materials that are subjected to shaking from seismic events. Saturated soils will be most susceptible\n38 because of high dynamic pore pressures that temporarily lower the effective stress. During this process,\n39 the soil particles will be rearranged into a denser configuration, with a resulting decrease in volume. The\n40 foundation materials at the IDF is not considered susceptible to liquefaction because the materials are\n41 well graded granular soils that are unsaturated and relatively dense.\n42 The IDF support building (not sited within the TSD boundary) will be located in Zone 2B as identified in\n43 the Uniform Building Code (ICBO 1997).\n44 4.3.4.4.6 Subsidence Potential\n45 In general, subsidence of undisturbed foundation materials would be the result of dissolution, fluid\n46 extraction (water or petroleum), or mining. The potential for subsidence will be negligible at the IDF\n47 based on the following.\nChapter 4.14\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * The soils underlying the IDF are coarse-grained sands and gravels, in a relatively dense\n2 configuration, which are not subject to piping that can cause transport of soil and resulting\n3 subsidence.\n4 * The groundwater level is deep, at least 69 meters below the base of the lined landfill, and does not\n5 affect bearing soils.\n6 * The soil and rock types below the IDF are not soluble.\n7 * No mining or tunneling has been noted. If the groundwater level was lowered substantially and\n8 consolidation occurred in the aquifer, local site-specific subsidence would be negligible because\n9 of the depth of the groundwater table below the lined landfill.\n10 4.3.4.4.7 Sinkhole Potential\n11 Borings in and around the IDF have not identified any soluble materials in the foundation soils or\n12 underlying sediments. Consequently, the potential for any sinkhole development is negligible.\n13 4.3.5 Liner System, Liners\n14 The following sections discuss the individual components of the IDF liner systems.\n15 4.3.5.1 Synthetic Liners\n16 As described in Section 4.3.3, the synthetic liners act as an impermeable barrier for leachate migration\n17 (Figure 4.2). The synthetic liners consist of high-density polyethylene material that make the liners\n18 resistant to chemical deterioration. Section 4.3.3 describes the synthetic liner system in detail.\n19 4.3.5.2 Synthetic Liner Compatibility Data\n20 During detailed design of the lined landfill, the composition of the expected leachate was estimated.\n21 Expected leachate composition was based on known waste composition, process information, leachate\n22 from other operating lined landfills, and similar sources of data. Leachate constituents were compared to\n23 manufacturers' chemical compatibility data for synthetic liner components. In addition, the results of\n24 previous chemical compatibility testing and studies were evaluated against leachate composition.\n25 Information gained from this evaluation was used to select a liner that will be compatible with the\n26 expected leachate.\n27 Compatibility testing for leachate tank liner material is planned for construction. An immersion test\n28 program is included in the technical specifications for the tank liner (anticipated to be XR-5 material).\n29 The immersion-testing program will require the construction general contractor to submit tank liner\n30 samples to the design engineer for immersion testing as part of the submittal and certification process for\n31 the tank. Immersion testing will follow EPA 9090A (and ASTM) test protocols.\n32 During landfill operation, the compatibility of waste receipts with the liner will be ensured. The\n33 compatibility of the waste constituents with the liner material will be established by laboratory testing if\n34 determined to be necessary, based on waste type and concentrations. Such tests will follow EPA\n35 Method 9090A or other appropriate methods. Test results will be evaluated using statistical methods and\n36 accepted criteria (based on past projects and agency acceptance) for liner/leachate compatibility.\n37 4.3.5.3 Synthetic Liner Strength\n38 As discussed in Section 4.3.3.3, the liner system will experience loads from several sources. During the\n39 detailed design process for the landfill, the strength of liner system materials was evaluated against these\n40 loads. The analysis indicated an adequate factor of safety for liner system materials.\n41 Seams in geomembranes is a critical area; however, correct installation methods make the seams stronger\n42 than the surrounding material. Detailed installation and testing requirements will be included in the\n43 construction quality assurance plan (Section 4.3.7.3) to ensure that the liner is constructed properly. In\n44 addition, methods will be established to demonstrate adequate seam strength is achieved during\n45 installation.\nChapter 4.15\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Seaming requirements for the geotextiles and CDN: These materials were overlapped sufficiently to\n2 provide complete area coverage, and relatively light seams were used to hold the panels in position during\n3 construction, seam strength requirements for these materials will be negligible.\n4 4.3.5.4 Synthetic Liner Bedding\n5 The primary geomembrane liner is in contact with the GCL and geotextile cushion underlying the\n6 drainage gravel.\n7 The secondary geomembrane liner is in direct contact with the compacted admix layer. This type of\n8 subgrade is typical for flexible geomembrane liners.\n9 With respect to the drainage gravel and operations layers, the geomembranes are protected by overlying\n10 geotextile cushion or CDN layers. These geotextiles were designed to provide adequate protection during\n11 construction and operation to withstand the loads discussed in Section 4.3.3.3.\n12 4.3.5.5 Soil Liners\n13 The IDF landfill is lined with a minimum (0.9-meter thick) layer of compacted soil/bentonite mixture\n14 (admix) under the secondary geomembrane liner. This layer has an in-place hydraulic conductivity of\n15 less than 1 x 10' centimeter per second. The soil component of the admix is silty fine sand or similar\n16 material from areas near the IDF. Approximately 12 percent bentonite by dry weight was added to the\n17 fine soil to achieve sufficiently low hydraulic conductivity; however, the percent might vary.\n18 4.3.5.5.1 Material Testing Data\n19 Laboratory testing will be performed on soil liner materials to confirm input parameters for engineering\n20 analyses and for refining material and construction specifications.\n21 Before constructing the lined landfill, a full-scale test fill of the admix material will be conducted. The\n22 primary purpose of the test fill will be to verify that the specified soil density, moisture content, and\n23 hydraulic conductivity values will be achieved consistently using proposed compaction equipment and\n24 procedures. In-place density will be measured using both the nuclear gauge (ASTM D2922) and sand\n25 cone (ASTM D1556) methods. In-place hydraulic conductivity will be determined from a two-stage\n26 infiltration from a borehole (ASTM D6391). Admix hydraulic conductivity will be estimated from\n27 thin-wall tube samples (ASTM D1587) obtained from the test fill and tested in the laboratory (ASTM\n28 D5084). Details of the test fill are presented in the Construction Quality Assurance Plan (Appendix 4B).\n29 During construction, field density (e.g., ASTM D2922, D2167, and/or DI556) and moisture content\n30 (ASTM D2216) will be measured periodically. Thin-wall tube samples (ASTM D1587) will be taken at\n31 regular intervals and will be tested for hydraulic conductivity (ASTM D5084). Additional details of field-\n32 testing during construction will be presented in the Construction Quality Assurance Plan.\n33 Dispersion and piping in the admix are not considered likely because the hydraulic conductivity, and thus\n34 the flow velocity, will be very low, making it difficult to move the soil particles or otherwise disrupt the\n35 soil fabric. In addition, the admix will be well graded, so the component particles will tend to hold each\n36 other in place. Therefore, testing for these characteristics will not be necessary.\n37 4.3.5.5.2 Soil Liner Compatibility Data\n38 As discussed in Section 4.3.5.2, expected leachate composition was determined as part of detailed landfill\n39 design. The results of previous chemical compatibility testing and studies were evaluated against leachate\n40 composition to determine the effect of leachate on soil liner composition or hydraulic conductivity. The\n41 tests followed the procedures of ASTM D5084 (flexible wall parameter) and considered the effects of\n42 radiation on the soil liner materials.\n43 4.3.5.5.3 Soil Liner Thickness\n44 The IDF was designed to operate to minimize the leachate head over the liner systems.\nChapter 4.16\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Design of the primary liner system included an additional clay layer (the primary GCL layer, which was\n2 previously described in Section 4.3.3.1) underlying the primary HDPE geomembrane to further minimize\n3 liner leakage from the primary liner. Note that only a single geomembrane is required under WAC 173-\n4 303 for the primary liner.\n5 Calculations evaluated the effectiveness of the primary soil liner as a barrier to leachate. Leakage\n6 analyses were performed for the primary liner system using EPA's Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill\n7 Performance (HELP) Model (Schroeder et al. 1997). Estimated leakage rates were compared to the\n8 Action Leakage Rate (ALR, which is defined in WAC 173-303-665[8] as \"the maximum design flow rate\n9 that the leak detection system ... can remove without the fluid head on the bottom liner exceeding\n10 1 foot\"), and were determined to be much lower than the ALR. This demonstrates the benefit of the GCL\n11 included in the primary bottom-lining system, which provides a composite lining system and minimizes\n12 actual leakage through the bottom primary lining system.\n13 Overall, the IDF is designed to actively convey and collect leachate from the liner areas of the facility to\n14 minimize leachate buildup over the liners. Leachate is conveyed to the LCRS and LDS sumps for active\n15 removal from the facility. In addition, the LCRS sump area has been designed with a 6-inch-deep sump\n16 trough where the LCRS pumps are positioned to minimize the area of the sump that has a permanent\n17 liquid level (below the pump intake/shutoff elevation). Both the LCRS and LDS sump pumps will be\n18 operated throughout the Active Life of the facility and into the post-closure period until leachate\n19 generation has essentially ceased. By actively removing leachate from the IDF, head buildup is\n20 minimized, which in turn minimizes leakage through both the primary and secondary liner systems.\n21 4.3.5.5.4 Soil Liner Strength\n22 The expected loads on the liner system are discussed in Section 4.3.3.3. Significant stresses in the soil\n23 liner that were considered include (1) stresses from the weight of the liner system, (2) stresses on the\n24 interface with the overlying materials, and (3) stresses during construction.\n25 Stresses will be present on the sideslopes from the weight of the operations layer and soil liner itself.\n26 Using material properties determined from laboratory testing, the stability of the soil liner was evaluated\n27 under both static and dynamic loading conditions. Standard methods of slope stability analysis were\n28 used. Interface strengths were found to provide adequate veneer stability for the liner system. Interface\n29 strength is the shear strength that occurs between layers of liner materials at their interface boundary, as\n30 established by ASTM test methods.\n31 The primary concern during construction will be bearing failure caused by the weight of overlying soil\n32 components of the liner system (e.g., drainage gravel on the floor) and the construction equipment used to\n33 spread these materials. Strength parameters developed from laboratory testing and standard analytical\n34 methods were again used to determine that adequate stability and bearing capacity exist for the IDF liner\n35 system.\n36 4.3.5.5.5 Engineering Report\n37 An engineering report was prepared for the lined landfill as part of the definitive design document\n38 package. The report describes the design of the liner system and includes supporting calculations.\n39 The critical systems IDF Design Report is provided in Appendix 4A. The final IDF design report was\n40 prepared under the supervision of a professional engineer registered in Washington State.\n41 4.3.6 Liner System, Leachate Collection and Removal System\n42 The purpose of the leachate collection and removal system is to provide sufficient hydraulic conductivity\n43 and storage volume to collect, retain, and dispose of, in a timely manner, fluids falling on or moving\n44 through the waste. The primary leachate collection and removal system provides the preferential path\n45 along which the leachate flows into the primary sump. The secondary leachate collection and removal\n46 system (also called the leak detection system) is located between the primary and secondary\n47 geomembranes. The secondary leachate collection and removal system provides the preferential path\n48 along which any fluids leaking through the primary liner system flow to the secondary sump.\nChapter 4.17\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The collected leachate will be pumped to a leachate collection tank, screened and/or sampled, and\n2 transferred to a permitted treatment and disposal unit.\n3 4.3.6.1 System Operation and Design\n4 The lined landfill operates in a way that ensures the bottom liner is maintained as dry as possible, and the\n5 head on the top liner does not exceed 30.5 centimeters measured above the flat 50-foot-by-50-foot LCRS\n6 sump HDPE liner. In extreme conditions (i.e., in excess of a 25-year storm event), the head on the top\n7 liner could exceed 30.5 centimeters for short durations. The operating methodology, described in the\n8 following paragraphs, ensures that liquids on the bottom liner are removed continuously before liquids\n9 could accumulate and exceed 30.5 centimeters for the design storm event.\n10 Both leachate collection systems operate either manually or automatically. When operated automatically,\n11 liquid level sensors will cycle the pumps on and off, in response to rising and falling leachate levels. The\n12 leakage rate through the top liner will be calculated to demonstrate that the leakage rate is less than the\n13 'action leakage rate'. Data to support the leakage rate calculations will be obtained either from the flow\n14 totalizer in the secondary leachate collection pump discharge line or from the liquid level gauges.\n15 Collected leachate from the secondary leachate collection system is pumped to the leachate collection\n16 tank.\n17 The design of the primary and secondary leachate collection systems is described in Section 4.3.3.1.\n18 System geometry was completed and material specifications were developed during the detailed design\n19 process. The leachate collection and removal system design will comply with WAC 173-303\n20 requirements and applicable guidance.\n21 Each sump has a thick layer of gravel designed to provide high hydraulic conductivity and storage\n22 capacity. Leachate is removed from the sumps by a pump installed in sideslope riser pipes. Pressure\n23 transducers monitor leachate level in the sumps and provide appropriate signals to the pump control\n24 system. All pumps and transducers are removable for maintenance, calibration, and related activities.\n25 4.3.6.1.1 Primary System\n26 The base of the leachate collection and removal system is defined by the primary geomembrane. On the\n27 floor of the lined landfill, the primary geomembrane is overlain by geotextile cushion, and the granular\n28 drainage layer. The granular drainage layer drains to the primary sump and a perforated pipe is located\n29 along the centerline of the cell to increase flow capacity to the primary sump. Geotextile layers at the top\n30 of the leachate collection and removal system prevent migration of fine soil particles into the gravel or\n31 geonet, thus prevent clogging. On the sideslopes, a CDN layer is over the geomembrane. The CDN\n32 includes bonded geotextiles on both sides of a geonet that increase the interface shear strength. Because\n33 of construction difficulties in placing a 30.5-cm thick gravel layer on 3:1 sideslopes, no drainage gravel\n34 was placed on the sideslopes.\n35 The leachate collection and removal system is covered by the operations layer. The layer is a minimum\n36 0.9-meter thick, and provides protection for the underlying liner and drainage materials. The operations\n37 layer covers both the landfill floor and the sideslopes.\n38 The leachate collection and removal system was designed to accommodate the 25-year, 24-hour storm, as\n39 required by WAC regulations. However, the EPA recognizes the need to store temporarily leachate from\n40 such rare events (EPA 1985). Should a storm event that exceeds the 25-year, 24-hour storm event occur,\n41 the leachate collection and removal system sump was designed to store temporarily leachate at a depth\n42 greater than 30.5 centimeters, as opposed to the alternative of constructing an excessively large leachate\n43 collection tank.\n44 The leachate collection and removal system sump is equipped with two sump pumps. One pump is a high\n45 capacity pump capable of rapid removal of large volumes of leachate, and is suitable for the transfer of\n46 batch quantities of leachate, and can handle the larger volumes of leachate anticipated from the 25-year,\n47 24-hour storm event. The other pump is a low-capacity submersible pump located in the base of the\n48 sump. The sump pumps are located in a sump trough.\nChapter 4.18\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The sump trough was designed to contain the leachate below the intake of these pumps, within the\n2 smallest possible area, to minimize the residual leachate volume after each pumping cycle. The pumps\n3 are fabricated from stainless steel or other corrosion resistant material.\n4 4.3.6.1.2 Leak Detection System\n5 The base of the LDS is formed by the secondary geomembrane. The leak detection system is similar to\n6 the LCRS, except that the perforated collection pipe is not included. The perforated pipe is not be needed\n7 because high flow capacity is not required for the low leachate volumes.\n8 The LDS drains to the LDS sump, which is located immediately below the LCRS sump. Because of the\n9 low volumes, the LDS is equipped with only one low-capacity submersible pump to meet\n10 WAC 173-303-665(8)(a).\n11 4.3.6.1.3 Response Action Plan\n12 In compliance with regulatory requirements, a response action plan (Appendix 4C) was prepared for the\n13 lined landfill. In accordance with EPA guidance, the action leakage rate was calculated as \"the maximum\n14 design flow rate that the leak detection system can remove without the fluid head on the bottom liner\n15 exceeding 30.5 centimeters\" (EPA 1992). If the action leakage rate were exceeded, DOE will do the\n16 following:\n17 * Notify the appropriate regulatory authority in writing of the exceedence within 7 days of the\n18 determination.\n19 * Submit a preliminary written assessment to the appropriate regulatory authority within 14 days of\n20 the determination, on the amount of liquids, likely sources of liquids, possible location, size,\n21 cause of any leaks, and short-term actions taken and planned.\n22 * Determine to the extent practicable the location, size, and cause of any leak.\n23 * Determine whether waste receipt should cease or be curtailed, whether any waste should be\n24 removed from the unit for inspection, repairs, or controls, and whether the unit should be closed.\n25 * Determine any other short-term and/or long-term actions to be taken to mitigate or stop any leaks.\n26 * Within 30 days after the notification that the action leakage rate has been exceeded, submit to the\n27 appropriate regulatory authority the results of the analyses specified in the following paragraphs,\n28 the results of actions taken, and actions planned. Monthly thereafter, as long as the flow rate in\n29 the leak detection system exceeds the action leakage rate, DOE will submit to the appropriate\n30 regulatory authority, a report summarizing the results of any remedial actions taken and actions\n31 planned.\n32 The leachate will be analyzed for RCRA constituents as appropriate. A procedure will be in place to\n33 address details of analysis (i.e., analyses, constituents, test methods, etc.). If the analytical results on\n34 leakage fluids indicate that these constituents are present, and if the constituents can be traced to a\n35 particular type of waste placed in a known area of the lined landfill, it might be possible to estimate the\n36 location of the leak. In addition, waste packages might not undergo enough deterioration during the\n37 active life of the landfill to permit escape of the contents; the leachate might be clean or the composition\n38 too general to show a specific source location.\n39 If the source location cannot be identified, large-scale removal of the waste and operations layer to find\n40 and repair the leaking area of the liner would be one option for remediation. However, this risks\n41 damaging the liner. In addition, waste would have to be handled, stored, and replaced in the landfill.\n42 Backfill would need to be removed from around any waste packages to accomplish this. If the waste\n43 packages were damaged during this process, the risk of accidental release might be high. For these\n44 reasons, large-scale removal of waste and liner system materials will not be a desirable option and will\n45 not be implemented except as a last resort.\nChapter 4.19\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI The preferred alternative will depend on factors such as the amount of waste already in the landfill, the\n2 rate of waste receipt, the chemistry of the leachate (i.e., is it clean?), the availability of other disposal\n3 units, and similar considerations. Therefore, no single approach will be selected at this time. If\n4 necessary, an interim solution could be implemented while the evaluation and permanent remediation\n5 were performed. Examples of potential approaches include the following.\n6 * The surface of the waste could be graded to direct run-off into a shallow pond. The surface\n7 would be covered with the low-hydraulic conductivity layer (geomembrane). Precipitation would\n8 be pumped or evaporated from the pond and would not infiltrate the waste already in the lined\n9 landfill. Waste would be placed only during periods of dry weather, and stored at other onsite\n10 TSD units at other times. This type of approach also could be used to reduce leakage\n11 immediately after the action leakage rate was exceeded, while other remediation options were\n12 evaluated.\n13 * Partial construction of the final closure cover could begin earlier than planned. This would\n14 reduce infiltration into the lined landfill, and possibly reduce the leakage rate if the cover were\n15 constructed over the failed area.\n16 * A layer of low-hydraulic conductivity soil could be placed over the existing waste, perhaps in\n17 conjunction with a geomembrane, to create a second 'primary' liner higher in the lined landfill.\n18 This new liner would intercept precipitation and allow its removal.\n19 * A rigid-frame or air-supported structure could be constructed over the landfill to ensure that no\n20 infiltration occurs. Although costly, this approach could be less expensive than constructing a\n21 new landfill.\n22 In general, the selected remediation efforts will be progressive. Those remediation methods that are\n23 judged the least difficult and the most cost effective will be used first. If these efforts are not effective,\n24 more difficult or expensive options would be used.\n25 4.3.6.2 Equivalent Capacity\n26 The CDN drainage layers used will be available commercially and will have equivalent flow capacity to a\n27 30.5-centimeters layer of granular drainage material with a hydraulic conductivity of 1 x 10-2 centimeter\n28 per second.\n29 4.3.6.3 Grading and Drainage\n30 In accordance with EPA guidance, all areas of the lined landfill floor (except the sump bottoms) are\n31 graded at a slope of at least 2 percent towards the centerline of each cell. The centerline of each cell has a\n32 1 percent slope lengthwise towards the sump, to facilitate drainage and avoid ponding on the liners.\n33 Grading tolerances have been established to ensure proper slope is maintained.\n34 4.3.6.4 Maximum Leachate Head\n35 The maximum head on the primary liner is less than 30.5 centimeters, except for rare storm events as\n36 discussed in Section 4.3.6.1 and the LCRS sump trough. The sump was sized and designed to provide\n37 adequate surge storage to prevent leachate build up on the primary liner.\n38 4.3.6.5 System Compatibility\n39 The primary and secondary leachate collection and removal systems is composed of inert geologic\n40 materials (sand and gravel), high-density polyethylene, and other geosynthetic materials such as\n41 polypropylene. As described in Section 4.3.5.2, the geosynthetics were evaluated for compatibility with\n42 the expected leachate. To ensure that the geosynthetics used in the lined landfill are similar chemically to\n43 those evaluated, manufacturers will be required to submit quality control certificates and other\n44 manufacturing information on all materials.\n45\nChapter 4.20\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Before a new waste constituent, not previously analyzed (based on a dangerous waste number), is allowed\n2 in the lined landfill, the waste constituent will be evaluated for compatibility with the liner (e.g., identified\n3 in 9090A test results or other appropriate testing methods, etc.). Other materials could contact the\n4 leachate, for example:\n5 * HDPE and Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) piping will be used.\n6 * Polyvinyl chloride and other plastics in miscellaneous uses.\n7 * Leachate tank will use a chemically resistant flexible geomembrane liner system.\n8 Compatibility of these materials with the expected leachate was considered in the landfill liner system\n9 design. Compatibility of these materials will be of lesser concern, because items that consist of these\n10 materials will be located entirely within the containment area. Failure of these items would not result in a\n11 dangerous waste release, and the materials would be replaced or repaired.\n12 4.3.6.6 System Strength\n13 Stability of drainage layer, strength of piping, and prevention of clogging are discussed in the following\n14 sections.\n15 4.3.6.6.1 Stability of Drainage Layers\n16 As described in Sections 4.3.3.3 and 4.3.5.3, the stability of the liners and leachate collection and removal\n17 systems on the sideslopes was evaluated as part of detailed design (Appendix 4A). To provide\n18 sufficiently high shear strengths at the interfaces between geosynthetic components, textured\n19 geomembranes and thermally bonded CDNs are used.\n20 Bearing capacity of the drainage and sump gravels is expected to be adequate, based on typical strength\n21 values for granular materials.\n22 The transmissivity of the drainage layers under the combined load of the waste and cover was addressed\n23 in the design and will be adequate to support leachate removal.\n24 4.3.6.6.2 Strength of Piping\n25 The drainpipes in the primary drainage and sump gravel and sideslope riser pipes are high-density\n26 polyethylene pipe. During detailed design, the required wall thickness of the pipe was determined\n27 according to the manufacturer's recommendations and standard analytical methods used by the piping\n28 industry (Appendix 4A). In these analyses, the ultimate load (derived from the estimated weight of the\n29 waste and cover) was used, the allowable deflections were limited to 5 percent, and conservative values\n30 for soil modulus and lateral confinement were assumed.\n31 4.3.6.7 Prevention of Clogging\n32 The geotextiles that separate the drainage layers from adjacent soil layers was selected based on the\n33 ability of the geotextiles to retain the soil and to prevent the soil from entering the leachate collection and\n34 removal systems. In addition, the amount of fine material in the drainage and sump gravels was limited\n35 by specification to less than a few percent, and is not expected to cause clogging problems (Appendix\n36 4A). Because the waste disposed in the lined landfill will be required to satisfy LDR\n37 (RCW 70.105.050(2), WAC 173-303-140, and 40 CFR 268), the amount of organic material is minimal,\n38 and consequently biologic clogging will not be a problem.\n39 4.3.7 Liner System, Construction and Maintenance\n40 Details relating to the liner system construction and maintenance are discussed in the following sections.\n41 4.3.7.1 Material Specifications\n42 Material specifications are provided in the following sections for each of the materials used in the liner\n43 system.\nChapter 4.21\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 4.3.7.1.1 Synthetic Liners\n2 As described in Section 4.3.3.1, both the primary and secondary geomembrane liners consist of\n3 high-density polyethylene. As described in Section 4.3.3.1.4, the primary barrier also contains a\n4 geosynthetic clay liner placed on the floor area only. Detailed specifications were prepared for the lined\n5 landfill as part of the design process.\n6 4.3.7.1.2 Soil Liners\n7 As described in Section 4.3.3.1, the soil liner consists of imported bentonite (expansive clay) blended\n8 with fine soil deposits on or next to the IDF. The fine soil was free of roots, woody vegetation, rocks\n9 greater than 2.54 centimeter in diameter, and other deleterious material. The bentonite content is\n10 dependent on the characteristics of the fine soil. Mixing was performed under carefully controlled\n11 conditions in a pugmill or other approved alternatives. The admix was placed and compacted to achieve\n12 an in-place hydraulic conductivity of I x 10-7 centimeter per second or less. The final surface of the soil\n13 liner was rolled smooth before placing the overlying geomembrane. Additional specifications were\n14 prepared for the lined landfill as part of the design process.\n15 4.3.7.1.3 Leachate Collection and Removal System\n16 Drainage and sump gravel consisted of hard, durable, rounded to subrounded material. The gravel was\n17 washed and the amount of fine material (i.e., passing the number 200 sieve) was limited to a few percent.\n18 The hydraulic conductivity of the gravel is I x 102 centimeter per second or greater. Additional\n19 specifications were prepared as part of the design process.\n20 For geotextiles and geonets, the composition, thickness, transmissivity, unit weight, apparent opening\n21 size, strength, and other properties were determined during detailed design based on results of engineering\n22 analyses, experience, and industry standard approaches.\n23 4.3.7.2 Construction Specifications\n24 Construction requirements for major components of the lined landfill are summarized in the following\n25 sections.\n26 4.3.7.2.1 Liner System Foundation\n27 The excavated subgrade surfaces was moisture conditioned and compacted as required to achieve the\n28 specified compaction before placing the admix layer.\n29 4.3.7.2.2 Soil Liners\n30 The soil and bentonite was blended thoroughly and moisture conditioned so that the admix is uniform and\n31 homogeneous throughout. The admix layer was placed in loose lifts and compacted so that the\n32 compacted lift meets the requirements of the Construction Quality Assurance Plan. Each new lift of\n33 admix was kneaded into the previously placed lift. The methods for admix preparation, type of\n34 compaction equipment, number of passes, and other details of the placement process was determined by\n35 constructing a test fill section before placing admix in the lined landfill.\n36 4.3.7.2.3 Synthetic Liners\n37 To protect the overlying geomembranes, the admix surface is smooth and free of deleterious material. In\n38 all cases, the high-density polyethylene liner was deployed with the length of the roll parallel to the slope.\n39 Adjacent panels were overlapped and thermally seamed using fusion or extrusion methods. Seams were\n40 inspected continuously using air pressure tests. A vacuum box was used in areas where air pressure tests\n41 cannot be used (e.g., extrusion weld areas). Destructive seam tests (ASTM D4437) (peel and adhesion)\n42 were performed on samples taken at regular intervals. Placing the overlying geosynthetic layers when\n43 practicable will protect the geomembranes.\nChapter 4.22\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 4.3.7.2.4 Leachate Collection and Removal Systems\n2 Drainage and sump gravel was placed and spread carefully over the underlying geosynthetics using\n3 suitable equipment to prevent damage. Hauling and placing equipment will operate on a minimum\n4 thickness of soil above any geosynthetic layer to avoid damage. Geosynthetic layers in the leachate\n5 collection and removal system were deployed, overlapped, and joined (e.g., tying for geonets, sewing for\n6 geotextiles) according to standard industry practice and the manufacturers' recommendations. Drainage\n7 and riser pipes were installed in the landfill. Pipes were bedded carefully and the landfill was backfilled\n8 to provide adequate lateral support. Pumps and other mechanical components are installed according to\n9 manufacturers' recommendations.\n10 4.3.7.3 Construction Quality Control Program\n11 A construction quality assurance plan (Appendix 4B) will be used during lined landfill construction and\n12 establishes in detail the following in accordance with WAC 173-303-335:\n13 Program must include observations, test, and measurements to ensure:\n14 * Proper construction of all components of the liners, leachate collection and removal system.\n15 * Conformity of all materials used in the design.\n16 4.3.7.4 Maintenance Procedures for Leachate Collection and Removal Systems\n17 The accessible components of the leachate collection and removal system will be maintained according to\n18 preventive maintenance methods. These methods will require periodic testing to prove that the\n19 equipment, controls, and instrumentation are functional and are calibrated properly. Testing intervals will\n20 be derived from applicable regulations and manufacturer's recommendations. All pumps and motors will\n21 be started or bumped monthly or at intervals suggested by the manufacturer, first, to demonstrate that the\n22 pumps and motors are functional and second, to move the bearing(s) so that the bearing surfaces do not\n23 seize or become distorted. Instruments will be calibrated annually or at intervals suggested by the\n24 manufacturer. When applicable, the preventive maintenance methods will include calibration\n25 instructions. The following instruments will require annual calibration:\n26 * LCRS sump level indicator\n27 * LDS sump level indicator\n28 Other instrumentation inside the leachate handling and storage facilities will also require routine\n29 maintenance.\n30 4.3.7.5 Liner Repairs during Operations\n31 Because of the 0.9-meter-thick operations layer, damage to the liner system is not expected. If damage\n32 did occur, the operations layer could be removed laterally as far as required. Underlying geosynthetic and\n33 gravel layers will be removed until an undamaged layer is encountered. The damaged layers will be\n34 repaired and replaced from the lowest layer upwards using similar methods to those employed during\n35 construction. Most repairs to the geomembranes will be performed using a patch, which will be placed,\n36 welded, and tested by construction quality assurance personnel.\n37 4.3.8 Run-On and Runoff Control Systems\n38 Because of the sandy soils, small drainage area, and arid climate at the IDF, stormwater run-on and\n39 run-off will not be expected to require major engineered structures. Interceptor and drainage ditches will\n40 be adequate for run-on and run-off control. The 25-year, 24-hour precipitation event was the design\n41 storm used to size the lined landfill systems. Beyond this, surface water evaluation is highly site-specific,\n42 and appropriate analyses were performed as part of detailed design for the lined landfill.\nChapter 4.23\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 4.3.8.1 Run-on Control System\n2 Run-on will be controlled by drainage ditches or berms around the perimeter of the lined landfill. Any\n3 overland flow approaching the landfill will be intercepted by the ditches or berms and will be conveyed to\n4 existing drainage systems or suitable discharge points. All the drainage ditches or berms were designed\n5 to handle the peak 25-year flow from the potential drainage area. By using low channel slopes, design\n6 flow velocities in the ditches will be maintained below established limits for sand channels.\n7 Between the landfill crest and the perimeter road, the area will be graded to provide drainage toward the\n8 perimeter road. The perimeter road will be sloped outward, at a grade of approximately 2 percent, to\n9 provide drainage away from the landfill. On the outside of the perimeter road, drainage ditches will be\n10 excavated to provide drainage away from the landfill.\n11 4.3.8.1.1 Design and Performance\n12 Design and performance details were determined for the landfill as part of the detailed design process.\n13 4.3.8.1.2 Calculation of Peak Flow\n14 Computation of design discharge for the drainage ditches or berms was performed using standard\n15 analytical methods, such as the Rational Method or the computer program HEC- I (USACE 1981). The\n16 25-year, 24-hour precipitation depth is 4.0 centimeters, based on precipitation data recorded from 1947 to\n17 1969 (PNL-4622). The tributary area for each section of ditch or berm was based on local topography.\n18 4.3.8.2 Runoff Control System\n19 There will be no run-off from the lined landfill because the landfill will be constructed below grade. Any\n20 precipitation falling on the landfill will be removed by either evapotranspiration or the leachate collection\n21 and removal systems. Therefore, a run-off control system will not be needed.\n22 4.3.8.3 Construction\n23 The drainage ditches or berms around the lined landfill were constructed with conventional earthmoving\n24 equipment such as graders and small dozers.\n25 4.3.8.4 Maintenance\n26 The drainage ditches or berms require periodic maintenance to ensure proper performance. The most\n27 frequent maintenance activity, beyond periodic inspection, will be cleaning the ditches or berms to\n28 remove obstructions caused by windblown soil and vegetation (e.g., tumbleweeds). After rare storm\n29 events, regrading of the ditch bottom or repair of the berm might be required to repair erosion damage.\n30 This is expected to occur infrequently; however, inspections will be conducted after 25-year storm events\n31 or at least annually.\n32 4.3.9 Control of Wind Dispersal\n33 The IDF will use varied methods to prevent wind dispersal of mixed waste and backfill materials,\n34 depending on the waste form. Methods to prevent wind dispersal include containerizing, stabilizing,\n35 grouting, spray fixitants, and backfill. In other instances, the operating contractor implements a wind\n36 speed restriction during handling, and immediately backfills the waste to prevent wind dispersal.\n37 4.3.10 Liquids in Landfills\n38 Free liquids will not be accepted except as allowed by Chapter 3.0, Section 1.2. Waste received at the\n39 IDF must comply with waste acceptance requirements.\n40 4.3.11 Containerized Waste\n41 Containerized waste received in the IDF lined landfill will be limited to a maximum of 10 percent void\n42 space. Several inert materials (diatomaceous earth, sand, lava rock) will be used as acceptable void space\n43 fillers for waste that does not fill the container.\nChapter 4.24\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nFigure 4.1. Integrated Disposal Facility Lined Landfill\nChapter 4.25\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nHE\n9 H . -A A\nElll\n5 4z\n~'V'~ ~ Nil\n2 ''V~7\nFigure 4.2. Example of a Typical Liner\nChapter 4.26\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nAPPENDIX 4A -SECTION 1\nPHASE I CRITICAL SYSTEMS DESIGN REPORT\nAppendix 4A.1.i\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAppendix 4A.1.ii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2 APPENDIX 4A -SECTION 1\n3 PHASE I CRITICAL SYSTEMS DESIGN REPORT\n4\n5 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n6 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................... ........ 15\n7 1.1 Purpose ......................................................... 15\n8 1.2 Scope .......................................................... 15\n9 1.21 General......................................................... 15\n10 1.2.2 Design Report ..................................................... 16\n11 1,3 Authorization ..................................................... 18\n12 1.4 General Facility Description ........................................... 18\n13 2.0 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ........................................... 21\n14 2.1 Washington State Dangerous Waste Regulations ................................. 21\n15 2.2 System Specification ...................... l.........................21\n16 2.3 Project Definition Criteria....................................................21\n17 2.4 Hanford Site Environmental Management Specification ........................... 21\n18 2.5 Design Loads for Tank Farm Facilities .................................... 22\n19 2.6 Technical Baseline Documents ......................... .................. 22\n20 2.7 National Codes and Standards .......................................... 22\n21 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS ........................................ ........ 23\n22 3.1 Geography ....................................................... 23\n23 3.1.1 Site Location ..................................................... 23\n24 31 2 Site Description ................................................... 23\n25 3.2 Meteorology and Climatology ..................................... ..... 23\n26 32.1 Precipitation ...................................................... 23\n27 3.2.2 Temperature ...................................................... 24\n28 3.2.3 Wind ...... ..................................................... 24\n29 3.2.4 Relative Humidity .................................................. 24\n30 3.3 Ecology ......................................................... 24\n31 3.3.1 Flora..... ...................................................... 24\n32 3.3.2 Fauna .......................................................... 24\n33 3.4 Geology ......................................................... 25\n34 3.4.1 Regional Geology ............................................ ...... 25\n35 3.4,2 Site Geology ...................................................... 25\n36 3.4.2.1 Stratigraphy ...................................................... 25\nAppendix 4A.1.iii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 3.43 Seismology ...................................................... 27\n2 3.5 Hydrology ....................................................... 27\n3 3.5.1 Surface Water ............................................................... 27\n4 3.5.2 Groundwater ..................................................... 27\n5 4.0 SITE INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TEST PROGRAM ................ 37\n6 4.1 Field Explorations.................................................. 37\n7 4,1,1 Existing Explorations............... ............................... 37\n8 4.1.2 Current Explorations..................................... ................. 38\n9 41 3 Site Stratigraphy ................................................... 38\n10 4.1.4 Future Explorations .......................................... ....... 38\n11 4.2 Laboratory Testing.............................................. 38\n12 4.2.1 Index Testing ..................................................... 38\n13 4.2.2 Admix Testing Program ...................... ................ 39\n14 4.2.3 Geosynthetics Interface Shear Testing ................................ .....40\n15 4.3 Laboratory Test Results ...................... ................ 41\n16 431 Index Testing ..................................................... 41\n17 4.3.2 Admix Liner Soils Test Results............... ................... ......41\n18 4.3.3 Geosynthetics Interface Shear Tests ................................ ...... 43\n19 5.0 ENGINEERING ANALYSIS .................................. ........ 43\n20 5.1 Slope Stability................................................................44\n21 5.1.1 Liner Veneer (Side Slope) Stability...................... ................. 44\n22 512 Earthwork Stability..........................................................44\n23 5.1.3 Waste/Fill Global Stability............................................45\n24 5.2 Landfill Bearing Capacity..............................................46\n25 5.2.1 Subgrade Soil..........................................................46\n26 5.2.2 Liner Soils....................................................... 46\n27 5.3 Settlement and Uplift Analyses......................................... 46\n28 5.3.1 Settlement Analysis of Liner Foundation...................................46\n29 5.32 Subsidence and Sinkhole Potential........................................ 46\n30 5.3.3 Uplift Potential.................................................... 47\n31 5.4 AdmixLiner...................................................... 47\n32 5.4.1 MixDesign............................................................... 47\n33 5.4.2 Placement and Testing ............................................... 48\n34 5.4.3 Freeze/Thaw ...................................................... 48\n35 5.5 Geosynthetic Liner Design ............................................ 49\n36 5.5.1 Geomembrane Liner Tension Caused By Thermal Contraction....................49\nAppendix 4A.1.iv\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 5,5,2 Liner System Strain Due To Settlement ............................ ........49\n2 5.5.3 Anchor Trench Pullout Resistance ............................................ 50\n3 5.5.4 Puncture Resistance ................................................. 50\n4 5,5.5 Operational/Equipment Loading .......................................... 51\n5 5,6 Liner Systems/Leachate Compatibility.................................... 52\n6 5.6.1 Lining System Description ............................................ 52\n7 5,6.2 Leachate Characterization Assumptions............................... ..... 53\n8 5.6.2.1 Synthetic Leachate Concentrations for W-025 Landfill..............................53\n9 5.6.2.2 Simulated Irradiation Exposure for W-025 Landfill. ................... ......... 54\n10 5.6.3 Chemical and Radiation Resistance.................... .................. 55\n11 5.6.3.1 Geomembrane .................................................... 55\n12 5.6.3.2 Geosynthetic Clay Liner (GCL) .................................... ..... 56\n13 5.6.3.3 Admix Liner ...................................................... 57\n14 5.6.3.4 Other Materials .................................................... 58\n15 5.7 Drainage Layer .................................................... 59\n16 5,7.1 Geotextile Analyses (Separation) ............................................. 59\n17 5.7.2 CDN Selection .................................................... 59\n18 5.7.2.1 CDN Geotextile Puncture Resistance ................................ ..... 59\n19 5.7.2.2 CDN Required Transmissivity .................................. ........ 59\n20 5.7,3 Drainage Gravel Selection ............................................ 60\n21 5.8 Leachate Production .......................................... ...... 61\n22 5.8.1 Leachate Production Analyses .............................................. 61\n23 5.9 Leachate Collection System ...................................... ..... 62\n24 5.9.1 Earth Loading Analyses..................................... .......... 62\n25 5.9.1.1 Leachate System Loading Analyses for Piping within Phase I Liner Limits ............ 62\n26 5.9.1.2 Leachate System Loading Analyses for Piping Outside of Phase I Liner Limits................. 62\n27 5.9.2 Leachate System Hydraulics Analyses ....................................... 63\n28 5.9.2.1 Leachate System Hydraulics Analyses ....................................... 63\n29 5.9.2.2 LCRS Gravity Flow Analyses .................................. ........ 63\n30 5.9.2.3 Leachate System Pumps and Force Mains Analyses ................................. 63\n31 5.9.2.4 Leachate Collection Storage Analyses ............................ ......... 64\n32 5.10 Surface Stormwater ................................................. 65\n33 5.10.1 Existing Conditions .......................................... .......65\n34 5.10.2 Proposed Stormwater Facilities ................................ ......... 66\n35 5.10.3 Analysis ......................................................... 67\n36 5.11 Action Leakage Rate (ALR) ........................................... 67\nAppendix 4A. 1.v\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 511.1 LDSALR........................................................67\n2 5.12 Building Systems Analyses ............................................ 68\n3 5.12.1 Geotechnical Design Parameters ........................................ 68\n4 512.2 Structural ........................................................ 68\n5 5.12.2.1 Crest Pad Building Foundation Analysis, Pipe Bracing and Winch.... ........................ 68\n6 5.12.2.2 Leachate Transfer Building Foundation Analysis ............................. 69\n7 5.12.2.3 Leachate Tank Foundation Analysis .......................................... 69\n8 5.12.2.4 Truck Loading Station Foundation Analysis and Leachate Loading ....... ............ 69\n9 5,12.3 Mechanical/Heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC).......................70\n10 5.12.3.1 Crest Pad and Leachate Transfer Building ......................... ......... 70\n11 5.12.4 Electrical/I&C ..................................................... 70\n12 5.12.4.1 Building Power Supply.................................... ................. 70\n13 5.12.4.2 Crest Pad Building Lighting ............................ ................ 75\n14 5.12.4.3 Leachate Transfer Building Lighting......................................76\n15 5.12.4.4 Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) Sizing ...................... ................. 77\n16 5.13 Civil Grading ..................................................... 77\n17 5.13.1 Waste Volume, Cut/Fill and Stockpile Requirement Calculations...................77\n18 5.13.2 Phase I Access Road and Ramp Cross Section Design .......................... 78\n19 6.0 FACILITY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ............................... 78\n20 6.1 Facility Layout.....................................................78\n21 6.1.1 Location ......................................................... 78\n22 6.1.2 Access Roads and Ramps ..................... ................ 78\n23 6.1.3 Survey Grids ...................................................... 79\n24 6.2 Landfill Geometry ............................................ ...... 79\n25 6.2.1 Waste Volumes and Types ............................................ 79\n26 6.2.1.1 Volume .......................................................... 79\n27 6.2.1.2 Waste Types ...................................................... 79\n28 6.2.2 Landfill Phases and Dimensions ........................................... 80\n29 6.2.2.1 Depth and Length................................................ 81\n30 6.2.3 Materials Balance .................. ...................... ....... 81\n31 6.2.4 Erosion Control Measures ............................................. 81\n32 6.3 Lining System Materials ...................................... ........ 82\n33 6.3.1 Liner Selection Basis................................................. 82\n34 6.3.2 Liner Materials -Barrier Components ....................................... 83\n35 6.3.2.1 Geomembranes .................................................... 83\n36 6.3.2.2 GCL ..... ....................................................... 83\nAppendix 4A. 1.vi\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 6.3.2.3 Admix Liner ...................................................... 84\n2 6.3.3 Liner Materials-Drainage and Protection Components.............. ............ 85\n3 6.3.3.1 Geotextiles ....................................................... 85\n4 6.3.3.2 CDN..... ...................................................... 85\n5 6.3.3.3 Drain Gravel ..................................................... 85\n6 6.3.3.4 Operations Layer ................................................... 86\n7 6.4 Leachate Collection System ........................................... 86\n8 6.4.1 Leachate Collection Piping............................................. 87\n9 6.4.1.1 Description........................................................ 87\n10 6.4.1.2 Design Considerations ...................................... ......... 87\n11 6.4.2 Leachate Transfer Piping.................................... ............... 88\n12 6.4.2.1 Description......................................................... 88\n13 6.4.2.2 Design Considerations ..................................... .......... 88\n14 6.4.3 Leachate System Pumps ..................... ................. 89\n15 6.4.3.1 LCRS Pumps ..................................................... 89\n16 6.4.3.2 LDS Pump ....................................................... 89\n17 6.4.3.3 Crest Pad Building Sump Pump .................................. ....... 90\n18 6.4.3.4 Leachate Transfer Pump.................. ................... ......... 90\n19 6.4.3.5 Combined Sump Pump ...................................... ......... 90\n20 6.4.4 Leachate Temporary Storage Tank........................................91\n21 6.4.4.1 Tank Volume ..................................................... 91\n22 6.4.4.2 Tank Design......................................................91\n23 6.4.4.3 Tank Liners ...................................................... 91\n24 6.4.4.4 Tank Leak Containment System.......................................... 92\n25 6.4.5 Pump Controls and System Instrumentation ......................... ........92\n26 6.4.5.1 Crest Pad Building .................................................. 92\n27 6.4.5.2 Leachate Transfer Building ............................................ 93\n28 6.4.5.3 Leachate Storage Tank ...................................... ......... 93\n29 6.4.5.4 Combined Sump.......................................... .........93\n30 6.4.6 Process Instrument Control System (PICS) ................................. 93\n31 6.4.6.1 Introduction ...................................................... 93\n32 6.4.6.2 Key Design Components (Elements)...................................... 94\n33 6.4.6.3 Open Items ....................................................... 94\n34 6.4.6.4 PICS Architectures ........................................... ......94\n35 6.4.6.5 PICS Instrumentation Architecture........................................94\n36 6.4.6.6 Instrumentation .................................................... 94\nAppendix 4A. I.vii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 6.4.6.7 Analog Instrumentation ....................... ............... 95\n2 6.4.6.8 Discrete Instrumentation............................................... 95\n3 6.4.6.9 PICS Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) Architecture ......................... 95\n4 6.4.6.10 PICS Operator Interface (OIU) Architecture ....................................... 96\n5 6.4.6.11 PICS Communication LAN Architecture ................................... 96\n6 6.4.6.12 Back Up Power....................................................97\n7 6.4.6.13 Control Panels.................................................... 97\n8 6.5 Stormwater Management ............................................. 97\n9 6.6 Building Systems .................................................. 98\n10 6.6.1 Crest Pad Buildings ......................................... ........ 98\n11 6.6.2 Leachate Transfer Buildings ........................................... 98\n12 6.6.3 Truck Loading Station.................................................98\n13 6.7 Electrical Service and Lighting .......................................... 98\n14 6.7.1 Introduction ...................................................... 98\n15 6.7.2 Key Design Components (Elements) .......................................... 99\n16 6.73 Open Items ....................................................... 99\n17 6.7.4 Assumptions to Open Items ............................................ 99\n18 6.7,5 Crest Pad Building Electrical Secondary Service and Metering .............. ...... 99\n19 6.7.6 Utilization Voltages ........................................... ..... 100\n20 6,7.7 Leachate Transfer Building Electrical Service .................... ............ 100\n21 6.7.8 Crest Pad and Leachate Transfer Building Lighting Panelboards .................. 101\n22 6.7.9 Feeder and Branch Circuits ........................................... 101\n23 67.10 Raceways ....................................................... 101\n24 6.7.11 Raceway Sizing, Selection, and Installation Guidelines............... .............. 101\n25 6.7.12 Wire and Cable................................................... 101\n26 6.7.13 Convenience Receptacles ............................................ 102\n27 6.7.14 Motor Control .................................................... 102\n28 6.7.15 Overload Protection ........................................... ..... 102\n29 6716 Grounding ....................................................... 102\n30 6.7.17 Equipment Grounding ...................................................... 102\n31 6.7.18 Lighting ........................................................ 102\n32 6.7.19 Emergency Lighting System................................................... 102\n33 6.7.20 Circuiting and Switching ....................................... ...... 103\n34 6.7.21 Heat Trace......................................................... 103\n35 6.7.22 Hazardous Classification ............................................. 103\n36 6.8 Construction QA Requirements.............................. .......... 103\nAppendix 4A.l.viii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 6,9 Interface with Non-Critical Systems ........................................... 104\n2 6.9.1 Entrance Facilities ......................................... ........ 104\n3 6.9.2 Administration and Control Facilities.. .................................... 105\n4 6.9.3 Waste Delivery Access Road............... .......................... 105\n5 6,9.4 Waste Treatment and Staging................ .................... ..... 106\n6 6.9.5 Gates and Fences .................................................. 106\n7 69.6 Site Utilities ..................................................... 106\n8 7.0 OPERATING PROVISIONS ................................................. 107\n9 7 1 Waste Placement................................................... 107\n10 7.1.1 Introduction ..................................................... 107\n11 7.1.2 Phase I Configuration ..................................................... 107\n12 7.1.3 Waste Receipts ................................................... 107\n13 7.1.4 General Waste Placement Procedures ............................... ..... 108\n14 7.1.5 Moveable Shielding Wall ................................. ............. 108\n15 7.1.6 Typical Array Size................................................... 109\n16 7.1.7 Cover Soil ...................................................... 109\n17 7.1.8 Failed Melter Disposal Area....... .......... .................. ...... 109\n18 7.1 9 Access Ramps .................................................... 109\n19 7.1.10 Filling Lift 1........................................................... 110\n20 7.111 Filling Lift 2............................................................... 110\n21 7.1.12 Filling Lift 3..................................................................... 110\n22 7113 Filling Lift 4.......................................... ......... 111\n23 7.1.14 Transitioning between Lifts....................1........................1\n24 7.1.15 Planning for Phase II and Operations During Phase II Construction ......... .............. 111\n25 7.2 Operational Interfaces ...................................................... 112\n26 7.2.1 IDF Landfill Excavation and Related Subsystems ....................... ..... 112\n27 7.2.2 IDF Liner System ............................................ ....... 112\n28 7.2.3 IDF Leachate Handling System.................................. ............ 113\n29 7.3 Leakage Response Action Plan ......................................... 114\n30 7.3.1 Action Leakage Rate................................................ 114\n31 7.3.2 Response Actions.................. ...................... ........ 114\n32 8.0 REFERENCES ................................................... 116\n33\n34\nAppendix 4A. 1.ix\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 TABLES\n2 Table 3-1. Water Levels in Groundwater Wells in the Vicinity of the IDF Site .................... 29\n3 Table 4-1. Results of the Base Soil Index Testing....................................41\n4 Table 4-2. Results of the Admix Hydraulic Conductivity Testing ........................... 42\n5 Table 4-3. Results of Admix Liner Soils Index Testing ............................ 42\n6 Table 4-4. Summary of Geosynthetic Testing ........................................ 43\n7 Table 5-2. EPA Test Method 9090 Compatibility Studies Comparison ............ .......... 54\n8 Table 5-3. Maximum Allowable Concentrations in Leachate by Chemical Category for Geosynthetic\n9 Components ...................................................... 58\n10 Table 5-4. Building Power Supply Load Factors.................... ................. 72\n11 Table 5-6. Building Power Supply Results/Conclusions................................74\n12\n13 FIGURES\n14 Figure 1-1. Integrated Disposal Facility Site Plan...................... .............. 20\n15 Figure 1-2. Overall Site Development Plan/Transportation Routes ............. ............ 20\n16 Figure 3-1. Location of the IDF and Nearby Boreholes ........................ ......... 30\n17 Figure 3-2. Geologic Map of the 200 East and 200 West Areas and Vicinity ................... 31\n18 Figure 3-3. Stratigraphy of the Hanford Site ........................................ 32\n19 Figure 3-4. Cross-section through the IDF Site (refer to Figure 3-1 for boring exploration locations)..... 33\n20 Figure 3-5. Hydrographs for Wells Near the IDF Site (1 and 2 of 3) ................... ..... 34\n21 Figure 3-6. Hydrographs for Wells Near the IDF Site (3 of 3) ....................... 35\n22 Figure 3-7. Contaminant Plume Map for the 200 East Area......................... 36\n23\n24\nAppendix 4A.1.x\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 APPENDICES\n2 Appendix A -Compliance Matrices\n3 A.1 WAC 173-303 Compliance Matrix\n4 A.2 System Specification Compliance Matrix\n5 A.3 Project Definition Criteria Compliance Matrix\n6 Appendix B -Laboratory Test Results\n7 B. I Admix Design Laboratory Test Results\n8 B.2 Site-Specific Interface Shear Strength Testing\n9 Appendix C -Design Calculations\n10 Slope Stability\n11 C.1.a Liner Veneer (Side Slope) Stability Analysis\n12 C. .b Earthwork Stability Analysis\n13 C.I.c Waste/Fill Global Stability Analysis\n14 Landfill Bearing Capacity\n15 C.2 Liner Soils Bearing Capacity\n16 Settlement and Uplift Analyses\n17 C.3 Settlement Analysis of Liner Foundation\n18 Admix Liner\n19 C.4 Admix Liner-Freeze/Thaw Analyses\n20 Geosynthetic Liner Design\n21 C.5.a Geomembrane Liner Tension Caused by Thermal Expansion/Contraction\n22 C.5.b Liner System Strain due to Settlement\n23 C.5.c Anchor Trench Pullout Resistance\n24 C.5.d Geomembrane Puncture Resistance\n25 C.5.e Operational/Equipment Loading\n26 Drainage Layer\n27 C.6.a Geotextile Selection (Separation)\n28 C.6.b1 Composite Drainage Net (CDN) Selection-CDN Geotextile Puncture\n29 C.6.b2 Composite Drainage Net (CDN) Selection-required transmissivity\n30 C.6.c Drainage Gravel Selection\n31 Leachate Production\n32 C.7 Leachate Production Analyses\n33 Leachate Collection System-Earth Loading Analyses\n34 C.8.a Leachate System Loading Analyses\n35 Leachate Collection System-Hydraulic Analyses\n36 C.8.b Leachate System Hydraulics Analyses\n37 C.8.c Leachate Collection Storage\n38 Surface Stormwater\n39 C.9 Surface Stormwater Analysis\n40 Action Leakage Rate\n41 C.10 LDS Action Leakage Rate\n42 Building Systems Analyses-Geotechnical\n43 C. 11.a Geotechnical Design Parameters for Foundation Analyses\nAppendix 4A.1.xi\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Building Systems Analyses-Structural\n2 C.1 1.bl Crest Pad Building Foundation Analysis\n3 C. 11.b2 Crest Pad Building Winch Support\n4 C.I1.b3 Pipe Support\n5 C. 11 .c Leachate Transfer Building Foundation Analysis\n6 C. 11.d Leachate Tank Foundation Analysis\n7 C. 11 .e Truck Loading Station Foundation Analysis\n8 C. 11 .e2 Truck Loading Connection\n9 Building Systems Analyses-Mechanical/HVAC\n10 C.11.f Crest Pad Building\n11 C.11.g Leachate Transfer Pump Building\n12 Building Systems Analyses-Electrical/I&C\n13 C.1 1.h Building Power Supply and Lighting Analysis\n14 Civil Grading\n15 C.12.a Grade Volumes for Ultimate Landfill\n16 C. 12.b Access Road and Ramp Cross-section Design\n17 Appendix D -Waste Placement\n18 D.1 Waste Placement Plans\n19\nAppendix 4A. 1.xii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS\n2 AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials\n3 Affiliate CH2M HILL, Inc.\n4 AFI Air freeze index\n5 ALR Action leakage rate\n6 AOS Apparent opening size\n7 ASCE American Society of Civil Engineers\n8 ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials\n9 AWWA American Water Works Association\n10 bgs Below ground surface\nII CDN Composite drainage net\n12 CDR Conceptual Design Report\n13 CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act\n14 CFR Code of Federal Regulations\n15 CH2M HILL CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc.\n16 Design Report IDF Phase I Critical Systems Design Report\n17 DOE U.S. Department of Energy\n18 DBVS Demonstration Bulk Vitrification System\n19 Ecology Washington State Department of Ecology\n20 EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency\n21 FH Fluor Hanford, Inc.\n22 FLA Full load amperage\n23 FS Factor of safety\n24 FVNR Full Voltage Non-Reversing\n25 GCL Geosynthetic clay liner\n26 GFCI Ground fault circuit interrupters\n27 gpm Gallons per minute\n28 GRI Geosynthetic Research Institute\n29 HDPE High-density polyethylene\n30 HEC Hydraulic Engineering Circular-I\n31 HELP Hydrologic Evaluation of Landfill Performance (Model)\n32 HF Hanford Facility\n33 HMS Hanford Meteorological Station\n34 HVAC Heating, ventilating, and air conditioning\n35 I/O Input/output\n36 ICDF INEEL CERCLA Disposal Facility (Idaho Falls, ID)\n37 IDF Integrated Disposal Facility (Hanford)\n38 IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers\n39 IES Integrated Engineering Software, Inc.\n40 ILAW Immobilized low-activity waste\n41 INEEL Idaho National Environmental Engineering Laboratory\n42 LAN Local area network\n43 LCRS Leachate collection and removal system\n44 LDS Leak detection system\n45 LERF Liquid Effluent Retention Facility (Hanford)\n46 LLW Low-level waste\n47 MBPS Megabits per second\n48 MCC Motor control center\n49 MLLW Mixed low-level wastes\n50 NEC National Electrical Code\n51 NFPA National Fire Protection Association\n52 OIU Operator interface unit\nAppendix 4A.1.xiii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI ORP Office of River Protection\n2 PC Performance category\n3 PICS Process Instrumentation and Control Systems\n4 PLCs Programmable logic controllers\n5 PNNL Pacific Northwest National Laboratory\n6 psi Pounds per square inch\n7 PVC Polyvinyl chloride\n8 QA Quality Assurance\n9 QC Quality Control\n10 RAP Response Action Plan\n11 RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976\n12 RF Radio frequency\n13 RGS Rigid galvanized steel\n14 RPP River Protection Project\n15 SCADA Supervisory control and data acquisition\n16 SDR Standard dimension ratio\n17 SOW Statement of work\n18 SPT Standard Penetration Testing\n19 SSCs Systems, structures, and components\n20 STI Soil Technology, Inc. (Bainbridge Island, Washington)\n21 THW Thermoplastic, vinyl insulated building wire; flame retardant, moisture and heat\n22 resistant, 750C, dry and wet locations\n23 TSD Treatment Storage and Disposal facility\n24 TRU Transuranic waste (concentrations of transuranic radionuclides greater than or\n25 equal to 1OOnCi/g of the waste matrix)\n26 UBC Uniform Building Code\n27 UPS Uninterrupted power supply\n28 USCS Unified Soil Classification System\n29 WAC Washington Administrative Code\n30 WSDOT Washington State Department of Transportation\n31 WTP Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (Hanford)\n32\nAppendix 4A. 1.xiv\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 1.0 INTRODUCTION\n2 1.1 Purpose\n3 The purpose of the Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF) is to develop the capability for near surface disposal\n4 of Immobilized Low-Activity Waste (ILAW) waste packages from the River Protection Project-Waste\n5 Treatment and Immobilization Plant (RPP-WTP). The IDF is essential in meeting the overall U.S.\n6 Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (ORP) mission to store, retrieve, treat, and dispose of\n7 the highly radioactive Hanford tank waste in an environmentally sound, safe, and cost-effective manner.\n8 The IDF will also provide capacity for disposal of mixed low-level waste (MLLW) and low-level (LLW)\n9 from the DBVS. The detailed design for the IDF Phase I Critical Systems landfill will finalize the design\n10 process for the:\n11 * Landfill liner system\n12 * Leachate removal system\n13 * Leak detection system (LDS)\n14 The IDF detailed design also involves completing all design work required for an operable landfill and\n15 supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) Part B permitting for the IDF.\n16 This Phase I Critical Systems Design Report (the Design Report) provides documentation of engineering\n17 calculations, criteria, and information that have been developed as part of the IDF detailed design for\n18 Phase I. Specifically, the Design Report documents the following important design information:\n19 * Identifies key design requirements for the project (Section 2).\n20 * Summarizes studies on site conditions and investigations that have been used in the development\n21 of detailed design parameters for the critical systems (Sections 3 and 4).\n22 * Presents detailed engineering analysis performed in the development of the Phase I Critical\n23 Systems design and updated during construction implementation (Section 5).\n24 * Provides system component descriptions, references important construction quality assurance\n25 (QA) requirements, and describes important interfaces with non-critical systems (Section 6).\n26 * Describes operating provisions that have influenced the development of the design including\n27 waste placement requirements, operational interfaces with other Hanford facilities, and leakage\n28 response action plan requirements (Section 7).\n29 1.2 Scope\n30 1.2.1 General\n31 CH2M HILL, Inc. (Affiliate) is responsible for production of a cost-effective final design and to produce\n32 critical systems detailed design documents and construction specifications to facilitate RCRA permit\n33 approval of the IDF. The IDF technical requirements are found in the following documents:\n34 * Immobilized Low-Activity Waste (ILAW) Project Definition Criteria, Revision I (RPP-7898)\n35 * System Specifications for ILAW Disposal, Revision 3 (RPP-7307)\n36 * Hanford Environmental Management Specification (DOE/RL-97-55)\n37 Design products are to be prepared in compliance with the technical requirements, as well as with other\n38 specific procedures that are dictated by CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc. (CH2M HILL) requirements\n39 and outlined in the Statement of Work (SOW), Integrated Disposal Facility Detailed Design Support\n40 (Rev. 2, 2003), described in more detail under Section 2 of this Design Report. The overall design work\n41 includes reports, schedules, estimates, and other special services as specified in the SOW. As part of the\n42 design effort, the Affiliate will perform the following global tasks:\nAppendix 4A. 1.15\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * Develop a conceptual layout and preliminary design drawings for the IDF. The IDF preliminary\n2 layout will depict a single expandable landfill system, with capability for segregation of RCRA\n3 regulated and non-regulated waste placement and segregated leachate management systems.\n4 * Develop a detailed design that meets the requirements of the ILAW Project Definition Criteria\n5 and the ILAW System Specification.\n6 * Develop the construction specifications for the detailed design.\n7 * Ensure that there is full technical integration between all detailed design reports prepared for the\n8 detailed design of the IDF.\n9 * Perform the design activities in accordance with all applicable regulatory requirements.\n10 The design will implement the safety and health protection requirements imposed on the design by the\n11 SOW and the technical baseline criteria documents, and will comply with all applicable regulatory\n12 requirements for the project. It is important to note that although the design is for identified critical\n13 systems of the Phase I IDF, a preliminary safety evaluation was performed for the W-520 Project that\n14 identified no safety class items, including criticality safety (Conceptual Design Report for ILA WFacility,\n15 CH2M HILL, May 2001).\n16 The timely completion of the critical system detail design of the IDF, in compliance with the RCRA\n17 permit approval process (Washington Administrative Code [WAC] 173-303-665 and 173-303-806[4][h]),\n18 is a critical component of the SOW. Drawings, construction specifications, and reports needed to obtain\n19 U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) certification and Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology)\n20 approval of the IDF RCRA Part B permit is the overall goal of the project. The detailed design for the\n21 initial Phase I disposal landfill and the critical systems design include the liner system, the leachate\n22 collection system, and the LDS. The detailed design will produce an operable landfill design and support\n23 the IDF RCRA Part B permitting.\n24 1.2.2 Design Report\n25 The Design Report describes the key facility components and provides the design basis and detailed\n26 calculations that support the development of drawings and specifications. Key facility components that\n27 are described in the Design Report include:\n28 * Facility layout (location, access roads and operational ramps, survey control system).\n29 * Landfill geometry (disposal volume total and per disposal unit, disposal unit dimensions).\n30 * Disposal unit grading design (foundation soils contour, lower admixture layer contour, operations\n31 layer cover contour).\n32 * Grid point listing (grid point number, location, and elevation for all grid points required for\n33 construction of the IDF).\n34 * Geosynthetic material design (primary geomembrane, secondary geomembrane, geotextile, and\n35 geocomposite drainage layer).\n36 * Leachate collection and removal system (LCRS) and LDS design (sump design, removal system\n37 design-LCRS and LDS, leachate level monitoring system design, transfer pump as required to\n38 meet WAC-173-303-665(2)(h)(ii) to ensure that the leachate depth over the liner does not exceed\n39 12 inches).\n40 * Leachate temporary storage tank system design (tank volume, tank design, tank materials/\n41 leachate compatibility, tank coating, tank secondary containment system), including electrical and\n42 power requirements necessary to support the leachate removal systems.\n43 * Pump controls and instrumentation design (control, operations, monitoring, and control building\n44 design).\n45 * Operational storm water management design.\nAppendix 4A.1.16\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * Backfill placement requirements and process (minimize void space, minimize subsidence of\n2 waste, placement and material requirements to ensure there are no adverse effects on the waste\n3 packages).\n4 * Other facility designs identified as necessary to support the project completion.\n5 The Design Report includes design calculations that are prepared in accordance with the requirements of\n6 procedure HNF-IP-0842 Vol. 4, Section 3.6 (July 30, 2002). Important calculations that are documented\n7 include:\n8 Stability (liner side slope [each liner layer based on interface strength], requirements for verification for\n9 critical interface strengths, fill placement ramp, global stability of the overall design, and other relevant\n10 stability analysis).\n11 Seismic analysis (side slope and global embankment stability under seismic loading, and seismic design\n12 of structures)\n13 Bearing capacity (liner sub-grade soils and other relevant bearing capacity analysis)\n14 Total settlement, differential settlement, and uplift analysis (foundations soils, compacted admixture\n15 layers, total settlement, top slope drainage evaluation, subsidence and sinkhole potential, uplift potential,\n16 and other relevant settlement analysis).\n17 Admix liner analysis (liner admixture bearing capacity, admix liner specifications, desiccation cracking,\n18 and other relevant liner admixture analysis).\n19 Geomembrane liner analysis (liner tension caused by thermal contraction/ expansion, anchor trench\n20 pullout analysis, puncture resistance, potential stress cracking, leachate compatibility, chemical and\n21 radiation resistance, mechanical degradation from operational traffic, and other relevant geomembrane\n22 analysis).\n23 Drainage layers analysis (geotextile analysis and selection, geocomposite selection, drainage gravel\n24 selection analysis, and other relevant drainage analysis).\n25 LCRS/LDS analysis (clogging prevention in LCRS, design of leachate collection sumps, design of high\n26 capacity and low capacity leachate removal pumping systems, design of leachate storage tank and\n27 secondary containment system, leachate depth monitoring system, design of leachate system control\n28 building, leachate compatibility of components in the LCRS, and other relevant leachate analysis).\n29 Leachate system earth loading analysis (LCRS and LDS slope riser pipes, LCRS collection pipe, leachate\n30 transfer pipes, and other relevant system loading analysis).\n31 Surface stormwater analysis (operations in-cell stormwater management, operations runon/runoff water\n32 management, site stormwater collection/evaporation management system, and other relevant storm water\n33 analysis).\n34 Leachate production analysis (average annual leachate production, peak daily leachate production,\n35 leachate tank storage capacity, leachate transportation truck capacity, and trip frequency)\n36 Action leakage rate (ALR) analysis (the maximum design flow rate that the secondary leachate collection,\n37 detection, and removal system can remove without the fluid head on the bottom liner exceeding one foot;\n38 calculation and justification of the maximum leachate infiltration rate through the primary liner system; a\n39 response action plan in case the maximum ALR is exceeded during operation of the IDF).\n40 Updates to calculations that have occurred through the construction process, either during independent\n41 quality reviews of tank systems, in response to contractor's requests for information, or changes\n42 implemented during construction have been attached to the original calculations in the appendices.\n43 Compliance matrices have been developed to demonstrate detailed design compliance with the applicable\n44 sections of the regulations (WAC 173-303) and with project-specific specifications, criteria, reports,\n45 codes, and standards.\nAppendix 4A.1.17\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Updates to the matrices that have resulted from the completion of construction activities and associated\n2 documentation are also provided. These matrices are presented in the Design Report in Appendix A.\n3 1.3 Authorization\n4 After careful consideration and evaluation, CH2M HILL elected to self-perform the IDF Phase I Critical\n5 Systems design. As such, the design is being performed as an inter-company work assignment by the\n6 Affiliate under the direction of CH2M HILL. CH2M HILL was authorized to self-perform the work by\n7 the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (ORP), in a letter dated December 9, 2002.\n8 CH2M HILL's Prime Contract Number with the ORP is DE-ACO6-99RL 14047. The inter-company\n9 work assignment is Contract 12317, Release 22, dated November 7, 2002.\n10 1.4 General Facility Description\n11 The IDF will consist of an expandable lined landfill located in the 200 East area on the Hanford Facility\n12 (HF). The landfill will be divided lengthwise into two distinct cells, one for disposal of low-level waste\n13 (LLW) and the other for disposal of mixed waste. The mission of the IDF will include the following\n14 functions:\n15 * Provide an approved disposal facility for the permanent, environmentally safe disposition of\n16 ILAW packages that meets the environmental requirements and is approved by the DOE and\n17 Ecology.\n18 * Receive ILAW from River Protection Project (RPP) tank operations and dispose this waste\n19 onsite. Receive waste from the DBVS and dispose this waste onsite.\n20 * A more detailed discussion of waste types and the necessary storage volumes for these wastes is\n21 provided in Sections 5 and 6, respectively.\n22 * The IDF will be constructed on 25 hectares of vacant land southwest of the Plutonium Uranium\n23 Extraction Facility (PUREX) Plant in the 200 East Area. The IDF will consist of a lined landfill\n24 that will be constructed in several phases. The landfill will be segregated into a RCRA permitted\n25 cell and a non-RCRA permitted cell. The scope of this permit is limited to the western cell of the\n26 landfill where the RCRA waste will be stored and disposed. The landfill is designed to\n27 accommodate four layers of vitrified LAW waste containers separated vertically by 0.9-meters of\n28 soil.\n29 * This initial construction will start at the northern edge and the size is approximately 223 meters\n30 East/West by 233 meters North/South by 14 meters deep. At this initial size, IDF disposal\n31 capacity is 82,000 cubic meters of waste. Subsequent construction phase(s) will require a\n32 modification to the Part B Permit to be constructed after waste placement has progressed in the\n33 landfill to the point that additional disposal capacity is needed. This approach minimizes the\n34 open area susceptible to collection of rainwater and subsequent leachate\n35 * The landfill is currently estimated at full build out to be up to 446 meters wide by 555 meters in\n36 length by up to 14 meters deep. The RCRA regulated portion of the landfill would be half of that\n37 at approximately 223 meters wide by 555 meters long by up to 14 meters deep providing a waste\n38 disposal capacity of up to 450,000 cubic meters.\n39 * Both cells will have a RCRA C-compliant liner system that consists of an upper primary liner\n40 overlying a lower secondary liner. The upper liner will consist of a composite geomembrane\n41 liner and geosynthetic clay liner system on the bottom area, and a single geomembrane on the\n42 side slope. The secondary liner will consist of a composite geomembrane, overlying a\n43 3-foot-thick soil admix liner. A LCRS and a LDS will overly the primary and secondary liner\n44 system, respectively. A Secondary Leak Detection System (SLDS) will be located below the clay\n45 liner, beneath the LDS sump.\n46 * The IDF also will include a less than 90-day accumulation area of leachate for storage in two\n47 tanks, one per landfill half. The leachate storage tanks will be located at the north end, in close\n48 proximity to the lined landfill.\nAppendix 4A. 1.18\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Each tank will be protected by secondary containment (double-lined tanks). Leak detection will\n2 be provided by monitoring of the secondary containment. The collected leachate will be stored\n3 and sampled before transfer to an onsite Treatment Storage and Disposal (TSD) unit or offsite\n4 TSD facility. The less than 90-day storage leachate collection tank will be operated in\n5 accordance with the generator provisions of WAC 173-303-200 and WAC 173-303-640, as\n6 referenced by WAC 173-303-200. The overall side development plan is shown in Figure 1-2.\n7 * The landfill will be constructed in several phases. Starting at the northern edge, approximately\n8 one-third of the total length of the landfill will be constructed in Phase I. This will include the\n9 leachate collection system and 90-day accumulation tanks. The subsequent phases will be\n10 constructed after waste has been placed in the landfill and additional disposal capacity is needed.\n11 This approach will minimize the amount of open area susceptible to collection of rainwater and\n12 subsequent leachate.\n13 * Before disposal, all waste will meet land disposal restriction requirements Revised Code of\n14 Washington 70.105.050(2), WAC 173-303-140, and 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 268,\n15 incorporated by reference in WAC 173-303-1401.\n16 * Future landfill development and configuration within the IDF will be subject to change as\n17 disposal techniques improve or as waste management needs dictate. Additional IDF landfill\n18 development beyond the 62 acres will be subject to an approved permit modification, in\n19 accordance with the HF RCRA Permit (Ecology, 2001).\n20 * Public access to the IDF will be restricted. Figure 1-3 depicts the normal transportation routes\n21 within the 200 East Area. Trucks typically will be used to transport waste to the IDF and will\n22 range in size from heavy-duty pickups to tractor-trailer rigs, depending on the size and weight of\n23 the load. In some cases, special equipment (such as transporters) will be used for unusual or\n24 unique loads. When special equipment is used, a prior evaluation will ensure that the equipment\n25 does not damage the roadways.\n26 * Approximately 60 personnel will traverse this roadway, in personal vehicles in three shifts per\n27 24 hours per week.\nAppendix 4A. 1.19\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Figure 1-1. Integrated Disposal Facility Site Plan\n2 Located in Chapter 1.0, Part A Form\n3\n4\n5 Figure 1-2. Overall Site Development Plan/Transportation Routes\n6 Located in Chapter 4.0, Figure 4.1\n7\nAppendix 4A.1.20\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 2.0 DESIGN REQUIREMENTS\n2 Minimum design requirements for the IDF Phase I Critical Systems Design were provided by CH2M\n3 HILL in the SOW for Requisition # 92859, Integrated Disposal Facility Detailed Design Support,\n4 Revision 2, February 18, 2003. The IDF Phase I Critical Systems Design has been performed in\n5 compliance with all applicable design requirements, defined in Sections 2.1 through 2.7, and these\n6 requirements are:\n7 * Washington State Dangerous Waste Regulations (WAC 173-303)\n8 * System Specification for Immobilized Low-Activity Waste Disposal System, Revision 3\n9 (RPP-7307)\n10 * ILAW Project Definition Criteria for Integrated Disposal Facility, Revision 1 (RPP-7898)\n11 * Hanford Site Environmental Management Specification, Revision 2 (DOE/RL-97-55)\n12 * Design Loads for Tank Farm Facilities (TFC-ENG-STD-06, REV A)\n13 * Technical baseline documents listed in Section 3.1 of the SOW\n14 * Applicable national codes and standards\n15 2.1 Washington State Dangerous Waste Regulations\n16 The Washington State Dangerous Waste Regulations (WAC 173-303) implement Subtitle C of Public\n17 Law 94-580, the RCRA in the State of Washington. By conforming to the requirements of\n18 WAC 173-303, the design of the IDF Phase I Critical Systems also complies with the federal hazardous\n19 waste requirements contained in 40 CFR 264, Standards for Owners and Operators ofHazardous Waste\n20 Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Appendix A. I provides a compliance matrix of where the\n21 applicable WAC 173-303 requirements are addressed in the IDF Phase I Critical Systems detailed design\n22 documents, or are addressed in documentation developed as a result of facility construction.\n23 2.2 System Specification\n24 The System Specification for Immobilized Low-Activity Waste Disposal System, Revision 3 (RPP-7307)\n25 contains the Level 1 system requirements for the Immobilized Low-Activity Waste Disposal System, of\n26 which the IDF is a part. Appendix A.2 provides a compliance matrix of where the applicable Level 1\n27 system requirements are addressed in the IDF Phase I Critical Systems detailed design documents, or are\n28 addressed in documentation developed as a result of facility construction.\n29 2.3 Project Definition Criteria\n30 The ILAWProject Definition Criteria for Integrated Disposal Facility, Revision I (RPP-7898) contains\n31 the design criteria for the IDF, including requirements flow-down from RPP-7303, System Specification\n32 for ILAWDisposal System, and DOE/RL-97-55, Hanford Site Environmental Management Specification.\n33 Appendix A.3 provides a compliance matrix of where the applicable design criteria are addressed in the\n34 IDF Phase I Critical Systems detailed design documents, or are addressed in documentation developed as\n35 a result of facility construction.\n36 2.4 Hanford Site Environmental Management Specification\n37 The Hanford Site Environmental Management Specification (site specification), Revision 2\n38 (DOE/RL-97-55) documents the top-level mission technical requirements for work involved in the\n39 Richland Operations Office, Hanford Site cleanup and infrastructure activities, under the responsibility of\n40 the DOE Office of Environmental Management. It also provides the basis for all contract technical\n41 requirements. Section 3.3.2, 200 Area Materials and Waste Management of the site specification contains\n42 the requirements for receiving and onsite disposal of ILAW from RPP tank operations. The documents,\n43 orders, and laws referenced in the site specification represent only the most salient sources of\n44 requirements. As such, the site specification is assumed to have no significant measurable requirements\n45 that would directly affect the IDF Phase I Critical Systems design.\nAppendix 4A.1.21\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 2.5 Design Loads for Tank Farm Facilities\n2 The Design Loads for Tank Farm Facilities (TFC-ENG-STD-06, REV A) defines the design\n3 requirements for systems, structures, and components (SSCs), and provides the minimum criteria for\n4 structural design and evaluation of SSCs. The standard establishes structural design loads and acceptance\n5 criteria for use in designing new SSCs. Figure 1 of this standard indicates that for new SSCs, structures\n6 and anchorage of systems and components are to be designed per DOE-STD-1020-02 and Section 3.0 of\n7 this standard. These were used for the design of the IDF Critical Systems facilities. The IDF Critical\n8 Systems facilities were defined by CH2M HILL as being Performance Category (PC)-1. The PC-i\n9 requirements in this standard were used in the structural design of the facilities included in IDF Phase I\n10 Critical Systems.\n11 2.6 Technical Baseline Documents\n12 The technical baseline documents are listed in Section 3.1 of the SOW. These documents include the\n13 System Specification for Immobilized Low-Activity Waste Disposal System, ILAW Project Definition\n14 Criteria for Integrated Disposal Facility, Hanford Site Environmental Management Specification, and\n15 Design Loads for Tank Farm Facilities, discussed in the preceding sections.\n16 2.7 National Codes and Standards\n17 In addition to WAC 173-303, the system specification, project definition criteria, site specification, and\n18 tank farm design loads that are discussed above, the IDF Phase I Critical Systems design was guided by\n19 other applicable sections of accepted professional and industry standards. These included the following:\n20 * Air Moving and Conditioning Association\n21 * American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO)\n22 * American Concrete Institute\n23 * American Galvanizers Association\n24 * American Institute of Steel Construction\n25 * American Iron and Steel Institute\n26 * American National Standards Institute\n27 * American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)\n28 * American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)\n29 * American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers\n30 * American Society of Mechanical Engineers\n31 * American Water Works Association (AWWA)\n32 * American Welding Society\n33 * Building Officials and Code Administrators -Basic Building Code\n34 * Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)\n35 * Concrete Reinforcing Steel Institute (CRSI)\n36 * Federal Standards\n37 * Geosynthetic Research Institute (GRI)\n38 * Hydraulic Institute Standards\n39 * Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE)\n40 * International Conference of Building Officials -Uniform Building Code (UBC)\n41 * Manufacturers Standardization Society\n42 * Metal Building Manufacturers Association\n43 * National Electrical Code (NEC)\n44 * National Electrical Manufacturers Association\nAppendix 4A.1.22\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * National Fire Protection Association (NFPA)\n2 * National Institute of Standards and Technology\n3 * Occupational Safety and Health Administration\n4 * Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors National Association\n5 * Steel Door Institute\n6 * Steel Structures Painting Council\n7 * Specialty Steel Institute of North America\n8 * The Aluminum Association, Inc.\n9 * Underwriters Laboratories, Inc.\n10 * Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Standard Specifications for Road,\n11 Bridge and Municipal Construction\n12 3.0 SITE CONDITIONS\n13 This section presents information on the Hanford Site and the area on the site where the IDF will be\n14 located. This information was obtained primarily from the ILA WPreliminary Closure Plan for the\n15 Disposal Facility (RPP-69 11) and other Hanford Site data sources. It is intended to provide a general\n16 characterization of the IDF site conditions that are pertinent to the design of the IDF Phase I Critical\n17 Systems.\n18 3.1 Geography\n19 The following paragraphs briefly describe the geography of the IDF site and are prepared from\n20 information in the ILAW Preliminary Closure Plan for the Disposal Facility (RPP-691 1).\n21 3.1.1 Site Location\n22 The location of the IDF is on the Hanford Central Plateau, in the 200 East Area within the Hanford Site\n23 boundary. The site identified for the IDF is 68 hectares (168 acres) of vacant and uncontaminated land,\n24 located southwest of the PUREX plant in the 200 East Area. It is bounded on the south by 1st Street and\n25 on the north by 4th Street.\n26 3.1.2 Site Description\n27 The IDF landfill will occupy approximately 25 hectares (62 acres) of the site identified for the facility.\n28 The remainder of the site will be used for soil stockpile, leachate storage tanks, operations support\n29 facilities, roads, parking areas, and open space. The IDF in Phase I will be approximately 11 hectares (28\n30 acres). Phase I will be located at the north end of the IDF landfill and will include provisions for\n31 expansion to the south for future phases.\n32 3.2 Meteorology and Climatology\n33 The following paragraphs briefly describe the climate of the IDF site and are prepared from information\n34 in the ILA WPreliminary Closure Plan for the Disposal Facility (RPP-69 11), which presented summary\n35 data from the Hanford Meteorological Station (HMS). Conditions at the HMS are considered similar to\n36 those at the IDF site. Detailed information is available in the Hanford Site Climatological Data Summary\n37 2001, with Historical Data (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, May 2002). The IDF Phase I Critical\n38 Systems is designed to operate in the climatic conditions reported in that document.\n39 3.2.1 Precipitation\n40 The site sits within the Pasco Basin, characterized as a semi-arid region because of its low annual\n41 precipitation levels. The basin receives 16 cm (6.3 inches) of annual average precipitation, with nearly\n42 half occurring in the winter months. Historical records indicate that the annual precipitation has varied\n43 from a low of 8 cm (3.1 inches) to a high of 30 cm (11.8 inches). Precipitation of 4 cm (1.56 inches) in\n44 24 hours reportedly can be expected to occur once every 25 years.\nAppendix 4A. 1.23\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 However, based on the Hanford Site Climatological Data Summary 2001, a value of 1.28 inches was used\n2 for the 24-hour, 25-year precipitation in the IDF Phase I Critical Systems stormwater design analysis (see\n3 Appendix C.9). Total annual snowfall has varied from 0.8 cm to 110 cm (0.31 to 43.3 inches), with an\n4 average annual snowfall of 34 cm (24.4 inches).\n5 3.2.2 Temperature\n6 Temperature conditions for the site range from extremely cold during the winter months to extremely\n7 warm during the summer months. Local temperatures can reach -18 degrees C (0 degrees F) during some\n8 winter months. January is the coldest month, with an average temperature of -2 degrees C (29 degrees F).\n9 The lowest temperature ever recorded was -33 degrees C (-27 degrees F). During some summer months,\n10 daytime temperatures can exceed 40 degrees C (104 degrees F). July is the warmest month, with daily\n11 high and low temperatures averaging 33 and 25 degrees C (92 and 61 degrees F), respectively. The\n12 highest temperature ever recorded was 46 degrees C (115 degrees F).\n13 3.2.3 Wind\n14 Wind conditions can vary considerably throughout the year. The monthly average is about 10\n15 kilometers/hour (6 miles/hour) during the winter and 15 kilometers/hour (9 miles/hour) during the\n16 summer. Wind speeds, especially during summer storm activity, can reach many times the average\n17 levels. The greatest peak gust was 130 kilometers/hour (81 miles/hour), recorded at 15 meters (50 feet)\n18 above the ground at the HMS.\n19 3.2.4 Relative Humidity\n20 The seasonal variation in the relative humidity is considerable, according to records of the HMS. The\n21 annual mean relative humidity recorded at HMS is approximately 54 percent, with the highest monthly\n22 average relative humidity (80 percent) occurring in December and the lowest monthly average relative\n23 humidity (32 percent) occurring in July. Daily relative humidity can change 20 to 30 percent between\n24 early morning and late afternoon, except in the winter months when changes are less pronounced.\n25 3.3 Ecology\n26 The following paragraphs briefly describe the ecology of the Hanford Site and are prepared from\n27 information in the ILA WPreliminary Closure Plan for the Disposal Facility (RPP-69 11). The site\n28 consists of undeveloped land and is characterized as a shrub-steppe environment. This environment\n29 contains numerous plants and animal species, adapted to the regions semi-arid climate. Because of the\n30 aridity and low water-holding capacity of the soils, the productivity of both plants and animals is\n31 relatively low. The IDF site exhibits many of these same general characteristics, although to varying\n32 degrees.\n33 3.3.1 Flora\n34 The dominant plants on the Hanford Site are big sagebrush, rabbitbrush, cheatgrass, Russian thistle, and\n35 Sandberg's bluegrass, with cheatgrass providing half of the plant cover. Root penetration to depths of\n36 over 3 m has not been demonstrated in the 200 Areas. Rabbitbrush roots have been found only at a depth\n37 of 2.4 m (8 feet) near the 200 Areas.\n38 3.3.2 Fauna\n39 A variety of birds and mammals inhabit the Hanford Site. The most abundant nesting birds of the shrub-\n40 steppe at the site are the horned lark and western meadowlark. Significant populations of chukar and grey\n41 partridge inhabit the Hanford Site. The most abundant mammals at the site are mice, ground squirrels,\n42 gophers, voles, and cottontail rabbits. Larger animals include mule deer and elk. The coyote is the\n43 principal mammalian predator on the Hanford Site.\nAppendix 4A. 1.24\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 3.4 Geology\n2 3.4.1 Regional Geology\n3 The 200 East Area lies on the Cold Creek bar, a geomorphic remnant of the cataclysmic, glacial related\n4 floods of the Pleistocene Epoch. As the floodwaters raced across the lowlands of the Pasco Basin and\n5 Hanford Site, floodwaters lost energy and began to deposit sand and gravel. The 200 Area Plateau is one\n6 of the most prominent deposits. The 200 Area Plateau lies just southwest of one of the major flood\n7 channels across the Hanford Site that forms the topographic lowland south of Gable Mountain.\n8 Borehole data provide the principal source of geologic, hydrologic, and groundwater information for the\n9 200 East Area and the IDF site. Numerous boreholes (both vadose zone boreholes and-groundwater\n10 monitoring wells) have been drilled in the 200 East Area for groundwater monitoring and waste\n11 management studies (Figure 3-1 shows the location of groundwater wells near the IDF site). However,\n12 data are limited within the IDF site, primarily because no previous construction or waste disposal\n13 activities have occurred in this part of the HF. Most boreholes in the 200 East area have been drilled\n14 using the cable tool method and either a hard tool or drive barrel to advance the hole. Some boreholes\n15 have been drilled by rotary and wire-line coring methods. More recently, boreholes in the area have been\n16 drilled, and in five cases cored, by percussion hammer methods. Geologic logs are based on examination\n17 of drill core, chips, and cuttings from these boreholes. Chip samples typically are taken at 1.5-meter (4.92\n18 feet) intervals and routinely archived at the Hanford Geotechnical Sample Library.\n19 3.4.2 Site Geology\n20 The IDF site will be located south of the Gable Mountain segment of the Umtanum Ridge anticline and\n21 about 3 kilometers (1.86 miles) north of the axis of the Cold Creek syncline, that controls the structural\n22 grain of the basalt bedrock and the Ringold Formation. The basalt surface and Ringold Formation trend\n23 roughly southeast-northwest parallel to the major geologic structures of the site. As a result, the Ringold\n24 Formation and the underlying Columbia River Basalt Group gently dip to the south off the Umtanum\n25 Ridge anticline into the Cold Creek syncline.\n26 Geologic mapping on the Hanford Site and examination of drill core and borehole cuttings in the area\n27 have not identified any faults in the vicinity of the IDF site (DOE/RW-0164). The closest known faults\n28 are along the Umtanum Ridge-Gable Mountain structure, north of the disposal site and the May Junction\n29 Fault east of the site (Figure 3-2).\n30 3.4.2.1 Stratigraphy\n31 The basalt and post-basalt stratigraphy for the IDF site is shown in Figure 3-3. Approximately 137 to 167\n32 meters (449 to 548 feet) of suprabasalt sediments overlie the basalt bedrock at the site.\n33 Basalt Bedrock. Previous studies (RHO-BWI-ST-14; Reidel and Fecht, 1994) have shown that the\n34 youngest lava flows of the Columbia River Basalt Group at the 200 East Area are those of the\n35 10.5 million-year old Elephant Mountain Member. This member underlies the entire 200 East area and\n36 surrounding area, and forms the base of the suprabasalt aquifer. No erosional windows in the basalt are\n37 known or suspected to occur in the area of the IDF site.\n38 Ringold Formation. Few boreholes penetrate the entire Ringold Formation at the IDF site, so available\n39 data are limited. The Ringold Formation reaches a maximum thickness of 95 meters (312 feet) on the\n40 west side of the site and thins eastward. The member of Wooded Island (Figure 3-3) is the only member\n41 of the Ringold Formation in the 200 East Area. The deepest Ringold Formation unit encountered is the\n42 lower gravel, unit A. Lying above unit A is the lower mud, and overlying the lower mud is an upper\n43 gravel, unit E. The sand and silt units of the members of Taylor Flat and Savage Island of the Ringold\n44 Formation are not present at the IDF site. Unit A and unit E are equivalent to the Pliocene-Miocene\n45 continental conglomerates (Reidel and Fecht, 1994). The lower mud is equivalent to the\n46 Pliocene-Miocene continental sand, silt, and clay beds (Reidel and Fecht, 1994).\nAppendix 4A. 1.25\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Only three boreholes have penetrated unit A in the area of the IDF site. Unit A is 19 meters (62 feet)\n2 thick on the west side of the site and thins to the northeast. Unit A is partly to well-cemented\n3 conglomerate consisting of both felsic and basaltic clasts in a sandy matrix and is interpreted as fluvial\n4 gravel facies (Lindsey, 1996). There are minor beds of yellow to white interbedded sand and silt.\n5 Green-colored, reduced-iron stain is present on some grains and pebbles. Although the entire unit appears\n6 to be cemented, the zone produced abundant high-quality water in borehole 299-E17-21 (PNNL-l 1957,\n7 1998).\n8 Nineteen meters (62 feet) of the lower mud unit were encountered in one borehole at the IDF site\n9 (PNNL-1 1957, 1998). The uppermost one-meter or so consists of a yellow mud to sandy mud. The\n10 yellow mud grades downward into about 10 meters (33 feet) of blue mud. The blue mud, in turn, grades\n11 down into seven meters (23 feet) of brown mud with organic rich zones and occasional wood fragments.\n12 The lower mud unit is absent in the center of the site (northeast of borehole 299-E24-7 on Figure 3-4).\n13 Unit E is described as a sandy gravel to gravelly sand. Unit E is interpreted to consist of as much as\n14 15 meters (49 feet) of conglomerate, with scattered large pebbles and cobbles up to 25 centimeters (9.84\n15 inches) in size in a sandy matrix. The gravel consists of both felsic and basaltic rocks that are well\n16 rounded, with a sand matrix supporting the cobbles and pebbles. Cementation of this unit ranges from\n17 slight to moderate. The upper contact of unit E is not identified easily at the IDF site. In the western part\n18 of the study area, unconsolidated gravels of the Hanford formation directly overly the Ringold Formation\n19 unit E gravels, making exact placement of the contact difficult. The dominance of basalt and the absence\n20 of cementation in the Hanford formation are the key criteria used to distinguishing these\n21 (PNNL-1 1957, 1998). In the central and northeast part of the area, unit E has been eroded completely.\n22 Unconsolidated gravels and sands typical of the Hanford formation replace unit E.\n23 Unconformity at the Top of the Ringold Formation. The surface of the Ringold Formation is irregular\n24 in the area of the IDF site. A northwest-southeast trending erosional channel or trough is centered\n25 through the northeast portion of the site. The trough is deepest near borehole 299-E24-21 in the northern\n26 part of the site (PNNL-13652, 2001). This trough is interpreted as part of a larger trough under the\n27 200 East Area, resulting from scouring by the Missoula floods.\n28 Hanford formation. The Hanford formation is as much as 116 meters (381 feet) thick in and around the\n29 IDF site. The Hanford formation thickens in the erosional channel cut into the Ringold Formation and\n30 thins to the southwest along the margin of the channel.\n31 At the IDF site, the Hanford formation consists mainly of sand dominated facies and less amounts of silt\n32 dominated and gravel dominated facies. The Hanford formation has been described as poorly sorted\n33 pebble to boulder gravel and fine- to coarse-grained sand, with lesser amounts of interstitial and\n34 interbedded silt and clay. In previous studies of the site (WHC-MR-0391, 1991), the Hanford formation\n35 was described as consisting of three units: an upper and lower gravel facies and a sand facies between the\n36 two gravelly units. The upper gravel dominated facies appears to be thin or absent in the immediate area\n37 of the IDF site (PNNL-12257, 1999; PNNL-13652, 2001; PNNL-14029, 2002).\n38 The lowermost part of the Hanford formation encountered in boreholes at the IDF site consists of the\n39 gravel-dominated facies. Drill core and cuttings from boreholes 299-E17-21, 299-E17-22, 299-E17-23,\n40 299-E17-25, and 299-E24-21 indicate that the unit is a clast-supported pebble- to cobble-gravel with\n41 minor amounts of sand in the matrix. The cobbles and pebbles almost are exclusively basalt, with no\n42 cementation. This unit pinches out west of the IDF site and thickens to the east and northeast\n43 (Figure 3-4). The water table beneath the IDF site is located in the lower gravel unit. The lower gravel\n44 unit is interpreted to be Missoula flood gravels, deposited in the erosional channel carved into the\n45 underlying Ringold Formation.\n46\n47\nAppendix 4A. 1.26\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI The upper portion of the Hanford formation consists of at least 73 meters (240 feet) of\n2 fine-to coarse-grained sand, with minor amounts of silt and clay and some gravelly sands.\n3 Holocene Deposits. Holocene, eolian deposits cover the southern part of the IDF site. Caliche coatings\n4 on the bottom of pebbles and cobbles in drill cores through this unit are typical of Holocene caliche\n5 development in the Columbia Basin. The southern part of the IDF site is capped by a stabilized sand\n6 dune. The eolian unit is composed of fine- to coarse-grained sands with abundant silt, as layers and as\n7 material mixed with the sand.\n8 Clastic Dikes. A clastic dike was encountered in borehole C3828, adjacent to well 299-E17-25 at the\n9 IDF site. Clastic dikes also have been observed in excavations surrounding the site (e.g., U.S. Ecology,\n10 the former Grout area, the 216-BC cribs, the Central Landfill, and the Environmental Restoration\n11 Disposal Facility [PNNL, BHI-01 103]). In undisturbed areas such as the IDF site, clastic dikes typically\n12 are not observed because these are covered by wind blown sediments. The occurrence of a clastic dike in\n13 borehole C3828 suggests that these probably are present elsewhere in the subsurface at the disposal site.\n14 3.4.3 Seismology\n15 The IDF will be located in Zone 2B, as identified in the UBC (DOE/RL-91-28). The analyses in\n16 Sections 5.1 and 5.12 provide additional seismic detail for design of liner and structural systems.\n17 No active faults, or evidence of a fault that has had a displacement during Holocene times, have been\n18 found on the Hanford Site (DOE/RL-91-28). The youngest faults recognized on the Hanford Site occur\n19 on Gable Mountain, over 4.5 kilometers (2.78 miles) north of the 200 East Area. These faults are\n20 Quaternary of age and are considered 'capable' by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (DOE/RL-91-28).\n21 3.5 Hydrology\n22 The following paragraphs briefly describe the known hydrology conditions of the Hanford Site and most\n23 specifically the 200 Area Plateau where the IDF site is located. These are prepared from information in\n24 the ILA WPreliminary Closure Plan for the Disposal Facility (RPP-691 1).\n25 3.5.1 Surface Water\n26 The IDF site is within the 200 East area, which is on a plateau above the Columbia River. The Columbia\n27 River runs generally to the east and swings around the site, lying about 8 miles northwest and northeast of\n28 the 200 East area. The project area is significantly higher than the Columbia River and is not in the\n29 river's floodplain.\n30 The soils in the project area are sandy with high rates of infiltration. Most of the precipitation falling on\n31 the site infiltrates into the ground, and there are no significant long-term surface water features in the\n32 project area.\n33 3.5.2 Groundwater\n34 The geologic structure of the 200 East area is composed of multiple layers of sediments that range from\n35 sand, silt, volcanic ash, and clay to coarse gravels, cobbles, and conglomerates that overlay thick layers of\n36 basaltic lava. An unconfined aquifer exists in the lower part of the sedimentary sequence, overlaying the\n37 uppermost basalt layer. This relatively thin aquifer intercepts infiltration from the unsaturated zone above\n38 it. The aquifer under the IDF site is approximately 90 to 100 meters (300 to 330 feet) below the ground\n39 surface. Therefore, the groundwater table is well below the proposed bottom of the excavation for the\n40 IDF and is not expected to influence the facility. The recharge of water into the ground at the IDF site is\n41 expected to be small. This condition results primarily from the low levels of annual precipitation that\n42 occur in the region of the IDF as well as the rest of the Hanford Site. A more detailed description of\n43 groundwater beneath the IDF, developed from various site explorations performed in the site area, is\n44 presented below.\n45 The unconfined aquifer under the IDF site occurs in the fluvial gravels of the Ringold Formation and\n46 flood deposits of the Hanford formation.\nAppendix 4A.1.27\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The thickness of the aquifer ranges from about 70 meters (230 feet) at the southwest corner of the site to\n2 about 30 meters (98 feet) under the northeast corner of the IDF site. The Elephant Mountain Member of\n3 the Columbia River Basalt Group forms the base of the unconfined aquifer (Figure 3-3).\n4 The unsaturated zone beneath the land surface at the IDF site is approximately 100 meters (328 feet) thick\n5 and consists of the Hanford formation. The water level in boreholes in and around the site indicates that\n6 the water table is in the lower gravel sequence of the Hanford formation and at an elevation of\n7 approximately 123 meters (404 feet) above sea level. The water table is nearly flat beneath the IDF site.\n8 Table 3-1 gives water level information from wells near the site. The locations of the wells are shown on\n9 Figure 3-1. The latest water table map shows less than about 0.1 meter (3.94 inches) of hydraulic head\n10 across the IDF site (PNNL-13404, 2001).\n11 The Ringold Formation lower mud unit occurs within the aquifer at the southwest corner of the IDF site\n12 (299-E17-21) but is absent in the central and northern parts of the site (299-E24-7 and 299-E24-21). The\n13 lower mud unit is known to be a confining or partly confining layer at places under the Hanford Site\n14 (PNNL-12261, 2000), and this might be the case under the southwest corner of the IDF site.\n15 Groundwater samples were collected and analyzed from above and below the lower mud unit during\n16 drilling of well 299-E17-21. Chemical parameters (pH, electrical conductivity, and Eh) were different in\n17 the two samples, suggesting that the lower mud is at least partly confining in the area. No contamination\n18 was found above or below the lower mud. An interpretation of the distribution and thickness of this\n19 stratum is shown in Figure 3-4. The surface of the lower mud unit is interpreted to dip gently to the\n20 southwest (PNNL-13652, 2001).\n21 Hydrographs for selected wells near the IDF site are shown in Figures 3-5 and 3-6. Hydrographs for the\n22 older wells (299-E23-1, 299-E23-2, and 299-E24-7) show two maxima in the water level. These coincide\n23 with the operation of the PUREX Plant that operated between 1956 and 1972 and between 1983 and\n24 1988. All the hydrographs show a decline in the water table during recent years. The rate of decline is\n25 between 0.18 and 0.22 meters (7.08 and 8.66 inches)/year and will take between 10 and 30 years to\n26 stabilize. The reason for the decline is the cessation of effluent discharge to the PUREX Plant and to the\n27 216-B Pond System, centered northeast of 200 East area. Based on hindcast water table maps (PNNL,\n28 BNWL-B-360), the water table is expected to decline another 2 to 7 meters (7 to 23 feet) before reaching\n29 pre-Hanford Site elevations. The cessations of effluent discharge also are responsible for changing the\n30 direction of groundwater flow across much of the 200 East area.\n31 Groundwater flow beneath the IDF site recently was modeled to be southeasterly (PNNL-13400, 2000).\n32 This direction differs from the easterly direction, predicted by the analysis of WHC-SD-WM-RPT-241\n33 and other earlier reports. The southeasterly flow direction primarily is attributable to inclusion of the\n34 highly permeable Hanford formation sediments in the ancestral Columbia River/Missoula flood channel\n35 in the analysis. A southeasterly flow direction is reflected in the geographic distribution of the regional\n36 nitrate and tritium plumes in the south-central 200 East area (Figure 3-7) (PNNL-1 3788, 2002.). As\n37 stated in PNNL-13404 (2001), the water table gradient is too low to be used for determining flow\n38 direction or flow rate at the PUREX Plant cribs, immediately east of the IDF site.\n39 Hydraulic conductivity directly beneath the IDF site was estimated from data collected during four slug\n40 tests at well 299-E17-21 and five slug tests of 299-E24-21. The interval tested at 299-El 7-21 was the\n41 upper 7.8 meters (26 feet) of the unconfined aquifer from 101.3 to 109.1 meters (332 to 358 feet) depth.\n42 That portion of the aquifer is Hanford formation gravel, from 101.3 to 102.1 meters (332 to 335 feet)\n43 depth, and Ringold Formation unit E gravels, from 102.1 to 109.1 meters (335 to 358 feet) depth\n44 (PNNL-12257, 1999). The interval tested at well 299-E24-21 was entirely in the Hanford formation\n45 gravel sequence between 95.2 and 101.3 meters (312 and 332 feet) depth. The best-fit value to the data\n46 from 299-E17-21 indicated a hydraulic conductivity of about 68.6 meters (225 feet) per day\n47 (PNNL- 12257, 1999), and that from 299-E24-21 suggested a hydraulic conductivity of 75 meters\n48 (246 feet) per day (PNNL-13652, 2001).\nAppendix 4A. 1.28\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTable 3-1. Water Levels in Groundwater Wells in the Vicinity of the IDF Site\nWell Measure date DTW ma WT elev mb Ref elev mc\n299-E13-10 3/14/02 101.7 122.5 226.31\n299-E17-12 3/14/02 100.0 121.1 221.09\n299-E17-13 4/12/01 97.7 122.6 220.34\n299-E17-11 4/12/99 97.8 122.8 220.54\n299-E17-18 10/3/02 98.5 122.3 220.76\n299-E17-20 4/9/97 97.1 123.2 220.33\n299-E17-21 4/23/98 100.4 122.7 224.26\n299-E17-22 5/20/02 98.1 122.5 220.59\n299-E17-23 5/20/02 101.6 122.2 223.84\n299-E17-25 5/21/02 98.3 126.7 225.03\n299-E18-1 3/14/02 98.2 122.4 220.65\n299-E18-3 6/27/96 97.8 123.4 221.20\n299-E18-4 6/27/96 97.7 123.4 221.05\n299-E19-1 3/22/88 100.4 124.9 225.26\n299-E23-1 3/14/02 96.0 122.4 218.39\n299-E23-2 12/20/94 97.2 123.5 220.77\n299-E24-4 8/10/98 90.6 122.9 213.47\n299-E24-7 6/11/97 96.2 123.2 219.34\n299-E24-16 10/4/02 97.7 122.3 220.02\n299-E24-17 4/7/97 97.36 122.9 220.16\n299-E24-18 10/2/02 98.0 122.3 220.35\n299-E24-21 3/22/01 95.4 122.6 217.85\na DTW = depth to water\nb WT elev = elevation of water table (meters above mean sea level)\nc Ref elev = reference elevation (meters above mean sea level, North American Vertical Datam\n88 reference), generally top of well casing.\n1\n2\nAppendix 4A. 1.29\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n200 East Area\nCO\nc 200-E23-17 0 MD EC\n299-E24-40299-E23-1\n4th Street 299-E23-2\n9 299-E24-21\n299-E24-7 299-E24-17\nL 290-E24-16 C 299-E18-3 299-E4-19 * 0299-E17-9\n299-E18-49 299-E17-20 *299-E17-14\nC 200-E17-22 200-E17-17\n_ 299- 18-1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ * *299-E17- 317-16\n299-E19-1 299-E17-12 209-E17-1\n29c172 299-E17-25 -I29 E1-21 e *299-E17-23\n699-E37-47A\nIntegrated Disposal\n299-E13-14 Facility Site299-E13-10\n0 Groundwater 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 meters\nMonitoring Well I I I\n0 1000 2000 3000 4000 feet\nG03010031-2\nFigure 3-1. Location of the IDF and Nearby Boreholes\nAppendix 4A.1.30\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n* ... 1. Fault, bar and ball on down throw side,\nteeth on thrust fault\n... Anticline QI = Loess\nSyncline Qa = Alluvium\nOda = Active Sand Dunes\nStabilized Sand Dunes\n-N- Hanford formation -Sands\no 1 2 3 Hanford formation -Gravel\nKilometers Columbia River Basalt Group\nGbeMou\n200 East Area\nIntegrated may\nDisposal JntoFacility Site I Fau! t\nR26E R27E\nFigure 3-2. Geologic Map of the 200 East and 200 West Areas and Vicinity\nAppendix 4A.1.31\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nAge Epoch Formation\n0 ka\n0 aEolian and Alluvium\n13 ka -- Touchet Beds (Sift-Dominated)\nc 0 '- - Missoula Flood\n500 ka 8 c - Sand-Dominated and Gravel-Dominated\n700 ka -\n3.4 Ma O-\nmember of Savage Island\n0- member of Taylor Flat\n0\na Unit E\nUnit C member of\nWooded Island\nUnit B\n...iaUnit D\nUnit A\nSnipes Mountain Conglomerate\nC\nSaddle Mountain\n.0 Basalt\n14.5 Ma .\nWanapum Basalt Flood-Basalt\n15.6 Ma *Flows and\nInterbedded\nGrande Ronde Sediments\nO Basalt\n17.0 Ma\n17.5 Ma Imnaha Basalt\nGO3010031-1\nFigure 3-3. Stratigraphy of the Hanford Site\nAppendix 4A.1.32\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nIntegrated Disposal Facility Site A'\nNortheast\n299-E17-21 299-E24-7 299-E24-21 299-E24-4\nEL73 E.716 EL716 El.8\n--- ------------- -\nModi mv\nasi M Seond, &avel H _l__t200 East Area b_ M wreve InTe \nPJ U*it$tS- Midy Sy GM-s 2nWesm\"nSan san* aaesewe\natta Muddy5 Sand CobbleBouldr\nS aMuddy City S\nto __ Tentative Correlations\n0301001-4\nFigure 3-4. Cross-section through the IDF Site (refer to Figure 3-1 for boring\n2 exploration locations)\nAppendix 4A.1.33\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n125.5\n115\n124,5\n124\nE123.5\n123\n12 **299-E172-12\n--293-E1 8-3\n122.5\n122\nJan-87 Jan-88 Jan-89 Jn-90 Jan-91 Jan92 Jan-93 Ja-94 Ja-95 Jan-96 Jan-97 Jmn98 Ja-99 Ja-OO Jan-)1 Jan-02 Jan-\nDate\n125.5\n125\n124.5\n124\n123 2 E23-2\n-0299-E24-18\n-A-299-E2417\n122.5\n122\nJan-60 Jan-65 Jn70 Jn-75 Ja-80 Jan-85 Jan-90 Jn95 jan-00\nDate\nFigure 3-5. Hydrographs for Wells Near the IDF Site (1 and 2 of 3)\nAppendix 4A.1.34\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n125.5\n125\n124.5\n124\nr\nS123.5\n123\n--299-E23-1\n*--*-299-E24-7\n122\nJan-60 Jan-65 Jan-70 Jan-75 Jan-80 Jan-85 Jan-90 Jan-95 Jan-00\nDate\nFigure 3-6. Hydrographs for Wells Near the IDF Site (3 of 3)\nAppendix 4A.1.35\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n0.\n*200 East Area\n. o ....... *.*\n0 20 400600 00 100 100Smte*\n0E007-00 300 100 f29E1-3ee69-7t7299-E17-25-0\nm Figue ire, mg.Cnainnilm apfrte20 atAe\nmassesseeauseAppendeix29A. 1.360*t orehol\n<7\n0 200 400 9600 800 100100mtr\nII~ll\n0 002000 300E400-ee\nGO0103-\nFiue37 Cnaiat lm a frte20 atAe\nADSiei4A13\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 4.0 SITE INVESTIGATION AND LABORATORY TEST PROGRAM\n2 This section presents a summary of the existing, current, and planned explorations for the IDF, along with\n3 the laboratory test results for tests conducted during this design effort.\n4 4.1 Field Explorations\n5 This section discusses the existing and current soil explorations for the IDF. The generalized soil profile\n6 used in the analysis and design is presented; the engineering soil properties used for design are presented\n7 and discussed in Section 5 and related appendices.\n8 4.1.1 Existing Explorations\n9 Several field explorations have been conducted in the general area of the IDF, as discussed in Section\n10 3.4.1 and presented in Figure 3-1. Figure 1-2 shows the current IDF footprint and the closest borings to\n11 the planned facility. As shown in Figure 1-2, with the exception of one boring, the existing explorations\n12 are all outside of the footprint of the IDF.\n13 The existing field explorations at the IDF site have been conducted primarily for geologic and\n14 hydrogeologic characterization on a \"big picture\" scale. The existing explorations provide detailed\n15 information for the purposes for which they were conducted; however, from a geotechnical engineering\n16 perspective, the existing borings at or near the IDF site provides only general information, as discussed\n17 below.\n18 Depth of Interest-In many cases, the explorations focused on providing detailed information for the\n19 entire soil column above the bedrock at the IDF site (300 or more feet below ground surface [bgs]). The\n20 primary depth of interest for detailed engineering and design purposes is the depth of the planned cell\n21 excavation (roughly 50 feet below the existing ground surface); for a few analyses, information about the\n22 material 25 to 50 feet below the base of the excavation is also important.\n23 Type of Information-As intended, the existing explorations was generally focused on providing\n24 information for geologic characterization purposes. This focus differs from the key items generally\n25 required for geotechnical design, including Standard Penetration Testing (SPT) per ASTM requirements\n26 and classification by the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) in both the field and the laboratory.\n27 For coarse-grained soils (sands and gravels), that make up the bulk of the native soil profile, in situ SPT\n28 in conjunction with grain-size data is the primary basis for determining geotechnical engineering\n29 parameters of the soil, such as shear strength. In all cases the SPT values were either not readily available\n30 or were conducted with non-standard equipment. Also, the existing grain size data and soil\n31 classifications, both for field and laboratory results were based on the Wentworth scale, which differs\n32 from the USCS scale at the gravel and fines divisions. These are the key division points for classifying\n33 coarse-grained soils. In particular, the break point for fines contents is important in determining the\n34 suitability of the excavated soils for use in the admix liner as well as for other on-site filling purposes.\n35 Many of the soils within the depth of interest for the IDF are near this classification break point.\n36 Proximity to the IDF-As shown in Figure 1-2, in nearly all cases the explorations were located outside\n37 of the IDF footprint. The standard of practice for geotechnical engineering is to place explorations within\n38 or very close to the footprint of the proposed structure, if possible.\n39 There have been several geotechnically focused explorations conducted for various projects at Hanford.\n40 The projects closest and/or most applicable to the IDF site are:\n41 The Grout Vault project, located approximately one-half mile east of the IDF site (Dames and Moore,\n42 1988).\n43 The W-025 Project, a radioactive mixed-waste land disposal facility designed in accordance with RCRA\n44 Subtitle C design criteria, located several miles west of the IDF site (in Area 200W, Golder Associates,\n45 1995, 1994a, 1994b, and 1988).\n46 The RPP-WTP, location approximately 1 mile east of the IDF site (Shannon and Wilson, 2000 and 2001).\nAppendix 4A.1.37\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI These projects all provide geotechnical engineering information; however, the closest site is one-half-mile\n2 from the IDF. The standard of care for geotechnical engineering is to either use existing geotechnically\n3 based information that is at the site and/or conduct site and project specific explorations. This is to verify\n4 that the soil conditions at the site are either still valid (no changes since the time of the existing\n5 explorations) or are consistent with existing data.\n6 4.1.2 Current Explorations\n7 Due to the limits of the geotechnical specific data, a subsurface exploration plan specific to the Phase I\n8 portion of the IDF was proposed. The suggested locations for the exploration are shown in Figure 1-2.\n9 This exploration is currently in planning.\n10 During this design effort, a limited surface sampling plan was conducted at the locations shown in\n11 Figure 1-2. The surface samples were taken from the upper 2 to 3 feet of soil, primarily to provide\n12 samples for admix testing (to determine if the soils were suitable as a base soil), as well as to help fill in\n13 for the absence of a full exploration program at the time of this design effort. As shown in Figure 1-2,\n14 samples were taken from primarily from the dune sand borrow area within the IDF footprint (SD-1\n15 through SD-4) and the active sand borrow area (SD-5) to the east of the IDF footprint. One surface\n16 sample (SD-6) was obtained from within the IDF Phase I limits.\n17 4.1.3 Site Stratigraphy\n18 In the absence of a comprehensive site and project specific geotechnical engineering data, the existing and\n19 current data discussed above was reviewed to determine appropriate soil profile and geotechnical\n20 parameters for use in engineering analysis and design. The stratigraphy and soil properties were generally\n21 selected conservatively to account for the uncertainty in the subsurface information. The general soil\n22 stratigraphy beneath the Phase I section of the IDF was assumed to be:\n23 * 10 feet of Dune (Eolian) sand, overlying\n24 * 50 feet of Upper Hanford sand, overlying\n25 Lower Hanford sand to depth of interest.\n26 It is expected that a greater depth of Dune sand exists in the southern portion of the IDF footprint (note\n27 topographic change in the southern one-third of the IDF footprint in Figure 1-2).\n28 The engineering properties and parameters assumed for these soil units were based on the information\n29 provided in the geotechnical reports listed in the previous section. The individual values are discussed in\n30 Section 5 and related appendices.\n31 4.1.4 Future Explorations\n32 It is recommended that a comprehensive, geotechnically focused exploration program be completed, prior\n33 to construction, to verify that the assumptions made for soil stratigraphy and engineering properties are\n34 valid. A more comprehensive set of explorations is currently being planned. The planned locations for\n35 the additional explorations are shown in Figure 1-2, and include three explorations within the Phase I\n36 footprint and one exploration in the proposed sand borrow area.\n37 4.2 Laboratory Testing\n38 A limited laboratory testing program was conducted, using the soils collected during the surface sampling\n39 program discussed in Section 4.1.3. These samples were used to perform the index testing, admix testing,\n40 and geosynthetics interface shear testing.\n41 4.2.1 Index Testing\n42 Index testing was performed to evaluate the basic index and classification properties of the soil obtained\n43 from surface sampling program. This testing was conducted to provide data for comparison with both the\n44 soils used for the W025 admix liner and also for other soils that are considered for use as the base soil for\n45 the IDF project, as the final design and construction proceeds.\nAppendix 4A.1.38\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The laboratory testing was conducted by Soil Technology, Inc., (STI) of Bainbridge Island, Washington,\n2 under subcontract to the Affiliate. Test assignment and coordination was provided by the Affiliate. Index\n3 testing included the following ASTM tests:\n4 * ASTM D422 -Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils (grain size and hydrometer\n5 analyses)\n6 * ASTM D698 -Test Method for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard\n7 Effort\n8 * ASTM D 1140 -Test Method for Amount of Material in Soils Finer then the No. 200 Sieve (P200\n9 Wash)\n10 * ASTM D1557 -Test Method for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified\n11 Efforts\n12 * ASTM D2216 -Test Method for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil\n13 and Rock\n14 * Compaction characteristics were also determined for a composite of the surface soils, as\n15 described in the next section.\n16 4.2.2 Admix Testing Program\n17 The admix testing program was developed to determine two key items:\n18 * Percentage of sodium bentonite required to meet hydraulic conductivity requirements\n19 * Appropriate moisture and density parameters to achieve the required hydraulic conductivity\n20 Index testing of the admix soils was also conducted, as well as a consolidation test. The laboratory\n21 testing was conducted by STI. Tests were run in general accordance with the following:\n22 * ASTM D422 -Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils (grain size and hydrometer\n23 analyses)\n24 * ASTM D698B -Test Method for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard\n25 Effort\n26 * ASTM D1557 -Test Method for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified\n27 Efforts\n28 * ASTM D2216 -Test Method for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil\n29 and Rock\n30 * ASTM D2435 -Test Method for One-dimensional Consolidation Properties of Soils\n31 * ASTM D4318 -Test Method for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils\n32 (Atterberg Limits)\n33 * ASTM D5084 -Test Method for Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity of Saturated Porous\n34 Materials Using a Flexible Wall Permeameter\n35 The base soil for the admix testing was created by compositing SD-I through SD-4 from the surface\n36 sampling program. This composite did not include SD-5, taken at the base of the existing sand borrow\n37 area (lower elevation than the other samples) that has slightly different properties than the remainder of\n38 the surface samples. SD-6 was not included at the time of the admix testing because it is not within the\n39 footprint of the planned borrow area. The base composite sample was labeled as COMP-1. This\n40 composite was then used to create the two other soils for admix testing:\n41 * COMP-2: COMP-1 base soil mixed with 8 percent bentonite\n42 * COMP-3: COMP-1 base soil mixed with 12 percent bentonite\n43 * Moisture and density testing was conducted on all of the composite samples.\n44\nAppendix 4A.1.39\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI The initial hydraulic conductivity testing was conducted using eight and 12 percent bentonite (by weight),\n2 based on the results of the admix testing program conducted by Golder for the W025 Project (Golder,\n3 1991 b). The target laboratory hydraulic conductivity was less than 10-8 cm/sec when permeated with\n4 water. Testing was not conducted with leachate, as no actual leachate exists for the planned waste at this\n5 time. Golder Associates used a synthetic leachate to perform compatibility testing on the admix liner.\n6 Based on these results, they increased the bentonite percentage from 8 to 12 percent, hence the use of\n7 these values in these tests. Because the base soils are expected to be similar to that used by Golder for the\n8 W025 landfill, and until a more refined characterization of the IDF leachate is developed, the\n9 compatibility testing performed for the W025 project was considered applicable to the IDF project.\n10 Hydraulic conductivity testing was performed on all samples in flexible wall triaxial cells with\n11 backpressure saturation, in general accordance with ASTM D5084. An effective confining stress of\n12 5 pounds per square in (psi) was applied to each test cell. Appendix B.1 includes the details for the test,\n13 including the inflow and outflow data used to confirm that each test had obtained a steady-state hydraulic\n14 conductivity value.\n15 After the initial hydraulic conductivity testing was completed, additional samples were set up to\n16 determine the range of moisture and density parameters that are expected to produce the required\n17 hydraulic conductivity in the field.\n18 As noted above, the samples used for the testing were gathered from the surface sampling program. Once\n19 a more comprehensive exploration program is conducted within the IDF footprint, the suitability of the\n20 soils within the excavation below a depth of 5 feet (upper 2-3 feet) can be examined for use as a base soil\n21 for the admix.\n22 4.2.3 Geosynthetics Interface Shear Testing\n23 A limited soil-to-geosynthetic interface shear testing program was conducted to determine the interface\n24 shear values between the operations soil and the composite drainage net (CDN), and the admix liner soils\n25 and the high-density polyethylene (HDPE). These interfaces are site specific because of the unique nature\n26 of the soils, hence their behavior in interface shear. The testing was conducted by Precision Geotechnical\n27 Laboratories in Anaheim, California. Soil samples collected during the surface sampling program were\n28 used for testing; GSE Lining Technologies, Inc. based in Houston, Texas provided the geosynthetics for\n29 testing.\n30 The interface shear tests were conducted in general accordance with ASTM D5321-Standard Test\n31 Method for Determining the Coefficient of Soil and Geosynthetic or Geosynthetic and Geosynthetic\n32 Friction by the Direct Shear Method. The tests were conducted for both low (100 to 500 psf) and high\n33 (1000 to 8000 psf) normal stress levels, to account for the variation in normal stresses that will be applied\n34 across the lining system in the final landfill configuration. Both the peak and residual strength values\n35 were determined during testing. Additional details for the tests are presented with the test results in\n36 Appendix B.2.\n37 Asperity testing was also conducted on the textured HDPE geomembrane, in general accordance with\n38 GRI-GM12 -Asperity Height of Textured Geomembrane. The purpose of the asperity testing was to\n39 establish a baseline roughness of the texturing of the HDPE geomembrane and for future assessments of\n40 the interface shear strength of other textured HDPE geomembrane products (e.g., from other\n41 manufacturers).\n42 Site-specific interface shear testing was not conducted for geosynthetic-to-geosynthetic (such as CDN to\n43 geosynthetic clay liner [GCL]) interfaces in this phase of design, as these values are primarily a function\n44 of the manufactured product properties. A database of values for geosynthetic-to-geosynthetic interface\n45 testing was used to determine the appropriate interface shear values for design. During construction, the\n46 actual materials used on the site will be tested as part of the construction QC/QA, to ensure that the\n47 installed materials used onsite meet or exceed the interface shear strength values used in the design.\nAppendix 4A. 1.40\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 4.3 Laboratory Test Results\n2 The results of the laboratory testing programs are summarized below and presented in Appendix B.l and\n3 Appendix B.2.\n4 4.3.1 Index Testing\n5 The results of the index testing for the surface samples are presented in Table 4-1. The test results are\n6 included with the admix liner soils test results in Appendix B.1. Results of the index testing indicate that\n7 the grain size analyses for near-surface soil samples from locations SD-I through SD-6 correlate well\n8 with data from the W025 base soil material. The W025 base soil was a dune sand (Eolian deposits)\n9 obtained from the upper 15 feet of site excavations. As discussed in Section 5.4, based on the results\n10 shown below and due to the limited nature of the near surface soil samples, the base soil is limited to the\n11 upper 5 feet of material excavated from the dune sand borrow area or the Phase I site excavation.\nTable 4-1. Results of the Base Soil Index Testing\nOMC, wopt MDD, Eax\nTest Sample # % Gravel % Sand % Fines (%) (pcf)\nSD#1 22.5 -- --\nSD#2 72.2 27.8 -- --\nSD#3 17.5 -- --\nGrain Size Testing\nSD#4 78.1 21.9 -- --\nSD#5 2.4 58.5 39.1 -- --\nSD#6 79.5 20.5 -- --\nStandardCompaci SD#6 -- -- -- 14 106.6Compaction\nOMC = optimum moisture content\nMDD = maximum dry density\n12 4.3.2 Admix Liner Soils Test Results\n13 The results of the testing program conducted on the admix liner soils are summarized in Tables 4-2 and\n14 4-3 and presented in detail in Appendix B. 1. The associated placement and testing requirements during\n15 construction are also discussed in detail in Section 5.4.\nAppendix 4A. 1.41\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTable 4-2. Results of the Admix Hydraulic Conductivity Testing\nSaturated\nRemolded Relative Hydraulic\nOMC MDD Remolded Wet Density Compaction Conductivity\nSample ID (%) (pcf) Mc (%) (pcf) (%) (cm/sec)a Gradient\nCOMP2-1 12.8b 117.2b 13.5 127 95 2x10' 11\nCOM!P2-2 12.8b 117.2b 17.7 123 89 4x0-8 10\nCOMP3-1 13.0b 115.5b 13.2 124 95 <1x108 10\nCOMP3-2 13.0b 115.5b 17.4 122 90 <1x108 10\nCOMIP3-3 10.0c 126.3c 10.3 136 98 <1x108 12\nCOMP3-4 10.00 126.3c 14.2 139 96 <1x108 10\nCOMP3-5 1O.O 126.3c 8 130 95 <1x108 18\nCOMP3-6 13.0b 115.5b 10 115 91 lx108- 21\nCOMP3-7 10.0c 126.3c 10 123 89 <1x108 20\nCOMP3-8 13.0b 115.5b 11 119 93 <1x108 16\nAbbreviations: OMC = optimum moisture content MIDD = maximum dry density pcf= pounds per cubic foot\nMC = moisture content\nCOMP 2 samples had 8 percent bentonite.\nCOMP-3 samples had 12 percent bentonite.\nAverage saturated hydraulic conductivity using tap water\nBased on standard Proctor compaction curve (D698).\nBased on modified Proctor compaction curve (DI 557)\nTable 4-3. Results of Admix Liner Soils Index Testing\nTest Sample # % Gravel % Sand % Fines LL (%) Pl (%)\nCOMP-1 -- 77.5 22.5\nGrain Size Testing COMiP-2 -- 70.6 29.4\nCOMP-3 -- 68.7 31.3\nCOMP-2 -- 40 17\nAtterberg Limits\nCOMP-3 -- 54 32\nLL = Liquid Limit\nPI =Plasticity Index\n2 Consolidation testing conducted on the admix liner soils is presented with the rest-of the results in\n3 Appendix B. 1. This results of this test were used for the settlement analysis discussed in Section 5.3.1.\nAppendix 4A. 1.42\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 4.3.3 Geosynthetics Interface Shear Tests\n2 The results of the geosynthetic testing program are presented in Table 4-4; the results of the asperity are\n3 shown in Appendix B.2. The results are discussed in detail in Sections 5.1.1 and 5.1.3, and their related\n4 appendices (Appendix C. .a and C. I.c, respectively).\nTable 4-4. Summary of Geosynthetic Testing\nPeak Peak Residual Residual\nFriction Cohesion Friction Cohesion\nTest Angle (*) (psf) Angle (0) (psf) Asperity Comments\n-Test #1Operations Soil-- Ts#29.6. 205.9 24.6 205.4 -dry density 92 pcfCDN Interface -w, = 8.7%\no- Test #30 Admix Soil-\nHDPE Interface94.4 33.5 56.8 -- -dry density = 110 pcf\n-we = 14%\n-Test #2Operations Soil- 28.3 283.9 28 240.8 -- -dry density = 92 pcfCDN InterfaceS- we = 8.7%\n..e -Test #4co Admix Soil-2 HDPE Interface 25.4 400.7 20.3 525.3 -- -dry density = 110 pcf\n-w = 14%\nTextured HDPE 23.5 Average value of two test\nAsperity results of 22 and 25.\n5 As the final design progress and additional information is gathered for the admix soils and the operations\n6 soils, these results should be verified with additional testing. Testing during full scale construction is also\n7 planned to verify that the materials used in construction, both soils and geosynthetics, produce interface\n8 shear values at or greater than those used for design.\n9 5.0 ENGINEERING ANALYSIS\n10 This detailed Design Report finalizes the design for the landfill liner system, the leachate removal system,\n11 and the LDS. Engineering analysis components for each of these critical systems is presented in this\n12 section. A general description of system components is located in Section 5.6.1, that presents the primary\n13 and secondary liner systems that make up the major layers of the landfill (detailed system descriptions are\n14 presented in Section 6).\n15 In preparation of the IDF design, a number of design requirements and criteria as presented in Section 2\n16 have been considered. Compliance with these design requirements is provided in Appendix A. The\n17 specific criteria evaluated for the IDF design included:\n18 * Slope stability\n19 * Landfill bearing capacity\n20 * Settlement and uplift analyses\n21 * Admix liner\n22 * Geosynthetic liner design\n23 * Liner systems/leachate compatibility\n24 * Drainage layer\n25 * Leachate production\n26 * Leachate collection system\n27 * Surface stormwater\nAppendix 4A.1.43\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * Action leakage rate\n2 * Building systems analyses\n3 * Civil grading\n4 5.1 Slope Stability\n5 Slope stability for the IDF landfill was examined for liner veneer (side slope) stability, earthwork\n6 stability, waste/fill global stability. The analyses for each of these cases are summarized in the sections\n7 below; Appendices C.1.a through C. I.c presents the analyses and results in detail.\n8 5.1.1 Liner Veneer (Side Slope) Stability\n9 The veneer stability of the liner system on the side slopes was evaluated for the period prior to waste\n10 filling. The analysis examined the potential for sliding of the drainage and operations layers on the liner\n11 system before waste is placed.\n12 The analyses were conducted using the weakest of the interface strengths of the various lining system\n13 components. The interface strengths were determined from regression analyses of data gathered from\n14 various sources, including site-specific test data completed to date. Based on the data (presented in\n15 Appendix C. .a), the critical interface is the textured HDPE/CDN interface. Properties of the cover soil\n16 (operations layer) were determined from laboratory testing to date on the materials expected to be used\n17 for the operations layer.\n18 Four loading conditions were examined:\n19 * Dead load: self-weight of the lining system (including the first operations layer)\n20 * Dead load + Equipment: self-weight of the lining system with an equipment load\n21 * Dead load + Seepage: self-weight of the lining system with a seepage load (to account for fluid\n22 head in the leachate collection system); seepage loads were based on results from the leachate\n23 system hydraulic analyses\n24 * Seismic Loading: self-weight of the lining system with seismic loading\n25 The results of the analyses show that the lining system is stable for the conditions analyzed and no\n26 anchorage forces are required to meet the minimum factors of safety (1.5 for dead load only; 1.3 for\n27 equipment and seepage loading). A minimum interface friction of 25 degrees and cohesion of 0 psf is\n28 required to meet the minimum acceptable factors of safety. The slopes are also considered to be stable\n29 under seismic loading, based on comparing the calculated yield acceleration and with the design\n30 acceleration values provided in the design criteria by CH2M HILL (September, 2002), using the hazard\n31 classification assigned to the overall facility.\n32 The critical interface friction values will be verified during construction to ensure that the system will be\n33 stable. The analyses and results are presented in full detail in Appendix C. I.a.\n34 5.1.2 Earthwork Stability\n35 The earthwork stability analysis covered the following three cases:\n36 Excavation Case: This case covers the stability of the landfill slopes immediately after excavation and\n37 before placement of the lining system. Only static loading was considered since this is an interim\n38 configuration that will only exist for the construction period.\n39 Ramp Case: This case covers the stability of the landfill slopes and access ramp at the south end of the\n40 cell, including equipment loading on the ramps. Both static and seismic loading were examined, as the\n41 access ramps are expected to be in use for a period of at least 10 years.\n42 Dike Case: This case covers the stability of the perimeter dike (shine berm and access road) after\n43 construction of the dike and before final closure of the landfill.\nAppendix 4A.1.44\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Both static and seismic loading were examined, since the perimeter dike may be in place until the final\n2 cover system is completed (greater than 10 years).\n3 Properties for the native soils are based on existing information, as a site-specific geotechnical\n4 engineering investigation program has not yet been completed for the IDF facility. When this\n5 investigation is completed, the results of this analysis (and any others that rely on the properties of the\n6 native soils) will be verified. Geometry used in the analyses is based on the civil plans (generally 3H:1V\n7 slopes with a few short 2H:1V slopes).\n8 The results of the analyses show that the planned configurations of the landfill are stable under static\n9 loading (factor of safety [FS] greater than 1.3 and 1.5, depending on the case analyzed); the\n10 configurations are also considered seismically stable based on the criteria for the Hanford site. Full\n11 details on the analysis method, the input data, and the results are presented in Appendix C. I.b.\n12 5.1.3 Waste/Fill Global Stability\n13 This analysis examined the following conditions:\n14 Phase I Full Build-Out: This case examined the stability of the waste mass in full build-out of the Phase\n15 1 waste cell. The critical stability examined was the waste sliding on the lining system. Both static and\n16 seismic loading conditions were examined.\n17 Final Configuration: This case examined the stability of the waste mass at the final configuration (entire\n18 IDF landfill completed) along the edge of the cover system. Only static loading conditions were\n19 examined, since this system is not being designed as part of the current effort.\n20 Interim filling conditions and the internal stability of the waste mass were not examined. The internal\n21 waste mass stability will primarily be a function of the filling methodology. Possible filling plans for the\n22 waste are currently being developed.\n23 For the analysis of the full build-out of Phase I, the critical interface strengths in the lining system were\n24 determined in the same way as for the veneer stability (regression analyses of existing and site specific\n25 testing data). A combination of peak and residual strengths were used, based on methodology currently\n26 being employed in the state of the practice. A final check was also made to confirm that the use of\n27 residual strengths in all locations resulted in a factor of safety greater than 1.0.\n28 The results show that the system is stable for the configurations analyzed and for the interface friction\n29 values available at the time of the analyses (FS greater than 1.5 in static loading and yield acceleration\n30 greater than the 10,000-year event). The system also has a FS greater than 1.0 for the case of residual\n31 strengths in all locations. The critical interfaces are the HDPE-CDN on the side slopes (using residual\n32 strengths) and the HDPE-GCL on the base liner (using peak strengths) and the internal GCL strength\n33 (using residual strengths). These results should be verified when additional site-specific test data\n34 becomes available prior to and during construction.\n35 Also, it should be noted that for the full Phase I build-out configuration, the most critical case appears to\n36 be a failure surface that is allowed to propagate through the waste mass. As noted previously, the waste\n37 mass was considered internally stable for this design effort. During final operations planning, the internal\n38 stability of the waste will be examined in conjunction with the proposed waste filling plan.\n39 For the final configuration with the cover in place, the preliminary geometry and assumed cover system\n40 properties show that the configuration is stable under static loading (FS greater than 1.5) and the critical\n41 failure does not intersect the waste mass. Stability of the final configuration under both static and seismic\n42 loading should be examined in more detail as the final design develops for the final closure of the entire\n43 IDF facility.\n44 A full discussion of the methodology, input data, and the results is presented in Appendix C.I.c.\nAppendix 4A. 1.45\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 5.2 Landfill Bearing Capacity\n2 5.2.1 Subgrade Soil\n3 Based on the available geotechnical data from other projects (as discussed in Section 4), the strength of\n4 the native subgrade soils beneath the landfill is expected to be greater than that for the operations layer or\n5 any of the liner system components. Greater strengths equate to higher bearing capacities, and hence, the\n6 bearing capacity of the subgrade soils within the landfill cell was not determined directly as they are not\n7 the controlling factor.\n8 The bearing capacity of the subgrade soils beneath the supporting structures adjacent to the landfill cell\n9 was determined for the structural analyses, discussed under Section 5.12.1-Geotechnical Design\n10 Parameters, and the results of the analyses are presented in Appendix C.1 l.a.\n11 5.2.2 Liner Soils\n12 The soil layers in the lining system include the operations layer, drain gravel, and the admix liner soils.\n13 The admix liner soils will be placed beneath the geosynthetic lining system, and as such, loading on the\n14 admix liner soils is limited to the allowable loads for the GCL. The allowable loads for the GCL are\n15 much less than what the bearing capacity of the admix liner soils would be (the admix soils have much\n16 higher strengths, particularly for bearing pressures). The drain gravel will be placed just above the lining\n17 system; the shear strength and associated bearing capacity are also much greater than the GCL allowable\n18 values.\n19 At the time of these calculations, structures that would cause bearing pressure were not yet determined.\n20 Hence, the bearing capacity for the operations soils was calculated for foundation widths from I to 10 feet\n21 and for 2 different shapes (square and strip). Properties for the operations soils were based on laboratory\n22 testing conducted to date; these properties will be verified during construction to ensure that the analyses\n23 results are valid.\n24 For a factor of safety of 3, the allowable bearing capacities for the operations layer are presented in\n25 Table 5-1.\nTable 5-1. Operations Soil Bearing Capacities\nB, Foundation Width (feet) gall, square foundation (tsf) ga1, strip foundation (tsf)\n1 0.20 0.33\n5 1.0 1.6\n10 2.0 3.3\n26 As the operations plans are further developed, these values can be updated for the planned structures\n27 (such as barrier walls). Details of the analyses are presented in Appendix C.2.\n28 5.3 Settlement and Uplift Analyses\n29 5.3.1 Settlement Analysis of Liner Foundation\n30 The long term settlement of the soils supporting the geosynthetic liner system was estimated based on the\n31 maximum loading expected in the landfill at the final IDF completion. The two soil units examined were\n32 the admix liner soils and the native subgrade soils. For the admix soils, data from laboratory\n33 consolidation testing performed on samples available at the time of the analysis were used to determine\n34 the estimated settlements. Elastic methods were used to estimate the settlements of the subgrade soils.\n35 As detailed in Appendix C.3, the estimated long term settlement over the lifetime of the landfill is 2.7 feet\n36 under the maximum loading.\n37 5.3.2 Subsidence and Sinkhole Potential\n38 Subsidence of undisturbed foundation materials is generally the result of dissolution, fluid extraction\n39 (water or petroleum), or mining. Subsidence is not expected to occur based on the following:\nAppendix 4A.1.46\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * The soils underlying the IDF are generally dense, coarse-grained, and well-graded sands and\n2 gravels that will not be subject to piping effects that could transport soil and result in subsidence.\n3 Also, sands and gravels are generally not susceptible to dissolution.\n4 * The groundwater level is deep and will not affect bearing soils.\n5 * The bedrock is basalt (volcanic), which is not generally susceptible to dissolution.\n6 * No mining or tunneling has been reported in the areas beneath or surrounding the site for the IDF.\n7 * Borings in and around the IDF have not identified any soluble materials in the foundation soils or\n8 underlying sediments. Consequently, the potential for any sinkhole development will be\n9 negligible.\n10 5.3.3 Uplift Potential\n11 The potential for uplift of the composite liner system is very low. The seasonal high-water level is over\n12 200 feet below the base of the base of the landfill cell, so no external hydrostatic pressure is expected\n13 from this source. Perched groundwater is not expected to occur due to the absence of continuous\n14 aquitards (such as a clay layer) within the coarse-grained native soils at the IDF site. Any infiltration that\n15 does occur is expected to percolate rapidly to deeper soil layers.\n16 Gas pressures are also expected to be negligible, as no gas-generating material (i.e., organic material) is\n17 expected in the foundation soils. Also, the subgrade soils are coarse grained and unsaturated, so any gas\n18 that might occur is expected to be rapidly dissipated.\n19 5.4 Admix Liner\n20 5.4.1 Mix Design\n21 WAC 173-303-665(2)(h)(i)(B) requires that the lower component of a composite bottom liner be\n22 constructed of compacted soil material with an in-situ hydraulic conductivity no greater than 10-7 cm/sec.\n23 Because of the lack of naturally occurring soils on-site that could achieve this requirement, a test program\n24 was developed to determine the admixture requirements for a mixed soil design using on-site base soil\n25 from either the Phase I excavation or dune sand borrow area (see Drawing H-2-830826 for location) and\n26 sodium bentonite. Details of the base soil field exploration and admix testing program are provided in\n27 Section 4.\n28 The results of the limited field exploration for base soil samples and subsequent admix testing program\n29 discussed in Section 4 show that a nominal bentonite content of 12 percent will meet the laboratory target\n30 hydraulic conductivity of less than 10-8 cm/sec when permeated with water. The laboratory target was\n31 established based on results of the soil liner/leachate compatibility study (Golder Associates, 1991b) for\n32 the W025 landfill. Details of Golder's study are discussed in Section 5.6. The W025 study concluded\n33 that the bentonite content of the admix should be increased from 8 percent (the minimum bentonite\n34 percent needed to achieve the required hydraulic conductivity) to 12 percent, to provide adequate\n35 resistance against high inorganic concentrations in the synthetic leachate for the W025 project. Index\n36 laboratory testing on the limited field exploration at the IDF site (surface sampling) established that the\n37 base soil for the IDF was similar to the W-025 project, as discussed in Section 4. Thus, until a more\n38 refined characterization of the IDF leachate is developed, the compatibility testing from the W025 testing\n39 is applicable to the IDF mix design.\n40 Once initial hydraulic testing confirmed that an admix with 12 percent bentonite content could achieve\n41 the laboratory target value, additional samples were set up to evaluate a range of moisture and density\n42 parameters and their effect on hydraulic conductivity. The additional hydraulic conductivity tests were\n43 performed to define moisture content-density requirements for a range of compactive energy, as outlined\n44 by Daniel and Benson (1990). This data was being used to develop an \"acceptable\" zone of moisture and\n45 density for use by QC personnel during construction. The acceptable zone for the 12 percent admix is\n46 presented along with the admix design laboratory test results in Appendix B. 1.\nAppendix 4A. 1.47\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI The acceptable zone was developed based on samples that achieved a hydraulic conductivity of less than\n2 10-8 cm/sec. A lower bound of 95 percent relative compaction, based on Standard Proctor (ASTM D698)\n3 compactive effort, was established to ensure adequate shear strength levels. As indicated in the technical\n4 specifications (see Section 02666), the moisture-density range of the compacted admixes shall lie within a\n5 trapezoidal-shaped field with the following comers:\nMoisture Content % Dry Density (pcf)\n8 126\n14 126\n12 110\n19 110\n6 Note that the minimum dry density of 110 listed above corresponds to approximately 95 percent of the\n7 maximum dry density for admix, as measured by ASTM D698.\n8 5.4.2 Placement and Testing\n9 The moisture-density requirements developed as part of the admix testing program will be included in the\n10 specifications for the admix liner (see discussion in Section 5.4.1, and technical specifications,\n11 Section 02666). The intent of the placement technical specifications is to help ensure that the admix liner\n12 will meet an in-place performance specification for hydraulic conductivity of less than l x10-7 cm/sec.\n13 The contractor is responsible for developing and implementing compaction means and methods that will\n14 produce the required relative compaction.\n15 The recommended nominal bentonite percentage (12 percent) and moisture-density parameters for the\n16 admix liner have been developed with a one order of magnitude factor of safety between laboratory and\n17 field values for hydraulic conductivity. The factor of safety is expected to account for two issues: (1)\n18 variations in the hydraulic conductivity between the laboratory soil amendment study and full-scale\n19 production, and (2) the laboratory samples were permeated with water rather than leachate, which could\n20 lead to a difference in the field hydraulic conductivity. However, factors such as base soil variability at\n21 the borrow source and field placement and construction are difficult to quantify until full-scale production\n22 begins for the admix liner. A test pad will be constructed as part the IDF construction to model the full-\n23 scale production. The purpose of the test pad is to determine acceptable processing, placement, and\n24 compaction methods that will produce a low-hydraulic conductivity admix liner with an in situ hydraulic\n25 conductivity of 10-7 cm/sec or less. The bentonite percentage and moisture content/density range may be\n26 modified if the preconstruction testing performed on the test pad indicates an in situ hydraulic\n27 conductivity greater than 10-7 cm/sec. Construction QA sampling and testing for the test pad is described\n28 in the Detailed Design Cell 1 Construction QA Plan (CH2M HILL, March 2004).\n29 5.4.3 Freeze/Thaw\n30 Compacted soil liners, such as the IDF admix liner, are known to be vulnerable to large increases in\n31 hydraulic conductivity due to freeze/thaw cycling; current data suggests that compacted soil bentonite\n32 admixtures may not be as vulnerable to damage as true clay liners (Kim and Daniel, 1992; Benson and\n33 Othman, 1993; Kraus et al., 1997). Existing laboratory data indicate that GCLs are less susceptible to\n34 damage from freeze/thaw conditions and therefore, do not undergo increases in hydraulic conductivity\n35 (Hewitt and Daniel, 1997; Kraus et al., 1997).\n36 In order to provide adequate freeze/thaw protection for the admix liner and avoid potential damage to the\n37 GCL a protective soil cover can be used. The thickness of the protective soil cover should exceed the\n38 predicted freeze depth. For the IDF, protective soil cover is provided by the operations layer on the side\n39 slope (3 feet) and the drain gravel and operation layer (4 feet total) on the bottom liner.\n40 The analysis was performed on the IDF lining system operations layer to determine the freeze depth or\n41 frost penetration for a probable freezing season during the 10-year expected period of waste filling.\n42\nAppendix 4A. 1.48\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Both a 10-year return period (90 percent probability on non-exceedance) and 20-year return period (95\n2 percent probability on non-exceedance) air freeze index (AFI) were used to estimate maximum frost\n3 penetration depth in the operations layer. If the maximum frost penetration depth were less than the 3-\n4 foot minimum thickness operations layer over the lining system, the proposed operations layer thickness\n5 would be considered as adequate protection for exposure of the lining system to freeze-thaw cycles.\n6 For the 10-year return AFI, the maximum freeze depth is estimated at 17 inches. For the 20-year return\n7 AFI, the maximum freeze depth is estimated at 21 inches. The maximum estimated freeze depths for both\n8 the 10-year and 20-year return period freezing seasons indicate that the proposed cover soil thicknesses\n9 provide more than adequate protection for the underlying admix liner and GCL from potential damage\n10 when subject to freeze-thaw cycles. Details of the freeze depth calculations are included in\n11 Appendix C.4.\n12 5.5 Geosynthetic Liner Design\n13 5.5.1 Geomembrane Liner Tension Caused By Thermal Contraction\n14 The HDPE geomembrane for IDF lining system will be subject to temperature-induced tensile strain from\n15 expansion/contraction as the geomembrane is exposed to temperature fluctuation.\n16 Strain on the liner was calculated using published values for the coefficient of linear thermal expansion\n17 for HDPE geomembrane (Koerner, 1998) and applying this to the maximum slope length. The maximum\n18 length is measured from the top of the slope, where liner is anchored, to the toe of the 3H:IV side slope.\n19 This is a conservative approach, as using the maximum slope length results in the maximum amount of\n20 expansion and strain on the liner. Additionally, a conservative temperature change of 40 degrees C\n21 (104 degrees F) was used in the analysis.\n22 The maximum liner strain was estimated to be less than 0.5 percent, based on a maximum temperature\n23 change of 40 degrees C (104 degrees F). The estimated maximum of slack in the liner on the side slope is\n24 8.6 inches. The corresponding amount of temperature induced stress is 566 psi. See Appendix C.5.a for\n25 supporting calculations.\n26 As shown in the technical specifications, Section 02661 (Table 1), the elongation at yield for the\n27 geomembrane that will be used in the liner system is at least 12 percent, with a minimum tensile strength\n28 at yield of 2,000 psi. Therefore, the maximum anticipated strains are well below the yield tensile strain\n29 and stress for the HDPE geomembrane, and temperature-induced strain will have no adverse impact on\n30 lining system function.\n31 It should be noted that temperature-induced strain is only applicable during the construction period when\n32 the HDPE geomembrane is exposed to temperature fluctuation. Once covered with 3 to 4 feet of cover\n33 soils (drain gravel and operations layer), the ambient temperature at the surface of the geomembrane will\n34 be more controlled and not subject to fluctuation.\n35 During installation, care must be taken to allow for expansion/contraction of the HDPE geomembrane to\n36 minimize the development of wrinkles that could become future stress points under soil and waste\n37 loading. The technical specifications (see Section 02661) provide requirements for control of wrinkle\n38 development during liner deployment, including the limitation of working when the temperature is below\n39 0 degrees C (32 degrees F) or above 40 degrees C (104 degrees F) without implementing installation\n40 procedures that address the environmental conditions.\n41 5.5.2 Liner System Strain Due To Settlement\n42 The barrier components (geomembrane and GCL) for the IDF lining system will be subject to settlement-\n43 induced tensile strains as the underlying soils, primarily the admix soil liner and the subgrade soil, settle\n44 over time. Strain within the lining system was calculated based on the results of the liner foundation\n45 settlement calculations (see Section 5.3 for settlement of foundation soil [subgrade] and admix liner).\nAppendix 4A. 1.49\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The strain calculation assumed that all vertical settlement was translated into strain along the liner rather\n2 than just the vector component parallel to the liner. This is a conservative assumption that establishes an\n3 upper bound for liner strain.\n4 The maximum liner strain was estimated to be less than 0.6 percent, based on a maximum estimate of\n5 2.7 feet of settlement at the base of the lining system. See Appendix C.5.b for supporting calculations.\n6 As shown the technical specification (Section 02661, Table 1), the elongation at yield for the\n7 geomembrane that will be used in the liner system is at least 12 percent. Based on studies of effect of\n8 differential settlement on GCLs (LaGatta et al., 1997), the limiting strain was defined as the strain in\n9 which an increase in hydraulic conductivity of the GCL was observed, which was taken as 5 percent.\n10 Therefore, the maximum anticipated strains are well below the yield or limiting tensile strain for the\n11 barrier components of the lining system (geomembrane and GCL). Settlement-induced strain from\n12 foundation and admix soil settlement under maximum landfill content pressure will have no adverse\n13 impact on lining system function.\n14 5.5.3 Anchor Trench Pullout Resistance\n15 During construction, the geomembrane could experience pullout forces caused by thermal\n16 expansion/contraction or wind uplift. However, tension from thermal expansion and contraction is\n17 expected to be small (see Section 5.5.1), and the geosynthetics installer can use sand bags or other\n18 approved method to control wind uplift during installation.\n19 After construction and placement of operation layer, the pullout forces on the geomembrane are expected\n20 to be negligible, as there is no tension force on the liner. As indicated in the veneer (side slope) stability\n21 analyses (see Section 5.1.1), the lining system interface strength exceeds the slope angle on the 3H: IV\n22 side slope. Thus, the pullout resistance requirements for the anchor trench are to support the self-weight\n23 of the geomembrane and other lining system components. Analyses for liner self-weight support\n24 requirements determined that the frictional resistance between geosynthetics exceeds the liner self-weight.\n25 Thus, no additional pullout resistance is needed at the anchor trench to support lining system self-weight.\n26 Supporting calculations for the anchor trench design, as shown on Drawing H-2-830838, Detail 3, are\n27 included in Appendix C.5.c. Based on the calculations for the configuration shown in the drawing, a\n28 pullout resistance ranging from 1840 pound/foot (lb/ft) to 2440 lb/ft is estimated (depending on actual\n29 mobilized interface shear strength). The required minimum tensile yield strength for 60-mil HDPE\n30 geomembrane in the technical specifications (see Section 02661) is 1440 lb/ft (120 lb/in), which results in\n31 the estimated pullout resistance exceeding the geomembrane tensile yield strength. This situation is due\n32 primarily to the configuration of the shine berm, which helps to anchor the system. While it is generally\n33 not desired for the pullout resistance to exceed the yield strength, this is not expected to be a problem at\n34 the IDF, since, as discussed above, the potential causes for geomembrane tension have been addressed\n35 and there is not a scenario for mobilizing tensile or pullout forces on the lining system.\n36 5.5.4 Puncture Resistance\n37 The primary geomembrane in the IDF will be overlain by the LCRS. For the side slope lining system, the\n38 LCRS consists of a CDN (see Detail 2 on Drawing H-2-830838) that provides protection for the primary\n39 geomembrane from the overlying operations layer. A separate discussion of the CDN geotextile puncture\n40 resistance is provided in Section 5.7.2. For the bottom lining (floor) system, the LCRS consists of drain\n41 gravel overlying the geomembrane (see Detail I on Drawing H-2-830838). A geotextile cushion will be\n42 required between the drainage gravel and the geomembrane to prevent the gravel from puncturing the\n43 geomembrane. An analysis was performed to determine the weight of the geotextile fabric required to\n44 prevent geomembrane puncture either from operating equipment loads or from the combined static weight\n45 of the waste and final cover.\n46\nAppendix 4A.1.50\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Koerner (1998) developed a method for estimating required geotextile thickness that considers the size\n2 and shape of the rock, as well as other factors that could decrease the long-term strength of the\n3 geomembrane. The equation used to determine puncture resistance is based on the mass per unit area of\n4 the geotextile and the protrusion height of the puncturing material.\n5 Operating loads were estimated based on a melter transport trailer operating directly on the surface of the\n6 first operations layer. Static loads were estimated for the post-closure condition by using the weight of\n7 four layers of ILAW packages with cover soil and a 15-foot-thick closure cover, with a 2 percent grade to\n8 the center of the landfill. The static load was more than two times greater than the operating load, and\n9 therefore was used as the basis for the puncture analysis. Detail calculations for geomembrane puncture\n10 resistance and corresponding cushion geotextile requirements are included in Appendix C.5.d.\n11 The proposed design specifies that the LCRS drainage gravel will have a gradation corresponding to\n12 WSDOT Standard Specification 9-03.12(4). This gradation has a maximum stone size of I inch. From\n13 the curves shown in the detailed calculations, the FS for a 12 oz/yd2 geotextile loaded by 1-inch angular\n14 rock is 4.5. For subrounded rock or gravel, this is more representative of the specified drain gravel, the\n15 FS increases to 8.9. The specified cushion geotextile (see technical specifications, Section 02371) has a\n16 nominal weight of 12 oz/sq yd, and therefore should be adequate to prevent geomembrane puncture.\n17 Koerner (1998) recommends a FS greater than 3.0 for the condition of packed stones on a geomembrane,\n18 such as would be the case for drain gravel over the geomembrane at the IDF.\n19 5.5.5 Operational/Equipment Loading\n20 The effects of loading on the GCL from construction and operational equipment and activities were\n21 examined. The maximum loads from the landfill waste itself were found to produce the highest loading\n22 on the geomembrane and the CDN; these materials were selected based on this maximum loading, as\n23 discussed in the previous sections.\n24 The cases for construction equipment loading and operational loading on the GCL were examined,\n25 including the extreme loading case of the crane placing the heaviest waste loads at its maximum reach, a\n26 situation which produces very high pad loads. The expected loads were compared to the calculated\n27 allowable GCL bearing capacity to determine if the loads would have an effect on the GCL. The\n28 allowable GCL bearing capacity was determined from classical geotechnical theory and based on\n29 manufacturer's strength data.\n30 The results of the analyses are presented in detail in Appendix C.5.e. For the construction loading, the\n31 analyses show that the specification requirements that limit construction loading are adequate to protect\n32 the GCL, based on the standard construction equipment anticipated to be used at the IDF and as examined\n33 in the calculations.\n34 For the operational loading cases examined, the critical condition is the crane operating under an extreme\n35 condition. The minimum dunnage requirement for the crane pads is 60 square feet, or if square, a 7.7-foot\n36 by 7.7-foot dunnage pad. Lower loads will require less dunnage and can be calculated as detailed in\n37 Appendix C.5.e. As discussed in the appendix, dunnage requirements calculated in this way are\n38 appropriate as long as the lining system is functioning as intended (i.e., no moisture in the LDS). If\n39 moisture enters the LDS and the GCL becomes hydrated, the dunnage requirements will be increased by a\n40 factor of approximately 2.5.\n41 It should also be noted that the primary purpose of the GCL in the IDF is not as a required lining system\n42 component (such as the geomembrane or the admix liner), but to \"deflect\" leachate from defects or\n43 pinholes in the primary geomembrane over the bottom area and longer-term storage areas (such as\n44 leachate sump trough), where the leachate head potential is greatest. The primary purpose of the primary\n45 GCL is to reduce the actual leakage rate into the LDS in the event of leak in the primary geomembrane.\n46 Given these considerations, the GCL should perform as intended under anticipated equipment and\n47 operational loading.\nAppendix 4A.1.51\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI As the operations plans for the landfill are developed, loading values can be compared to the results\n2 shown in Appendix C.5.e to determine if the loads will affect the GCL.\n3 5.6 Liner Systems/Leachate Compatibility\n4 The purpose of this analysis is to demonstrate that the liner materials proposed for the IDF landfill are\n5 chemically compatible with the leachate. Certain materials deteriorate over time when exposed to\n6 chemicals that may be contained in hazardous leachate. It is important to anticipate the type and quality\n7 of the leachate that the landfill will generate and select compatible liner materials. Data collected from\n8 other similar low-level radioactive mixed waste and hazardous waste sites were used in conjunction with\n9 the anticipated IDF leachate concentrations to evaluate the allowable concentration of leachate\n10 constituents that could be in contact with the IDF landfill liner components.\n11 5.6.1 Lining System Description\n12 Detailed discussion of the lining system design elements is provided in Section 6. A summary is\n13 provided in this section to facilitate discussion with respect to the chemical and radiation resistance of the\n14 lining system components.\n15 Drawing H-2-830838 (Detail 1) shows the bottom liner section consisting of the following components,\n16 from top to bottom:\n17 * A 3-foot-thick operations layer\n18 * A separation geotextile (polypropylene)\n19 * A 1-foot-thick leachate gravel layer\n20 * A minimum 12 oz/square yard cushion geotextile (polypropylene)\n21 * A 60-mil (nominal thickness-see Section 6.3.2.1) textured primary HDPE geomembrane\n22 * An internally-reinforced GCL\n23 * A CDN drainage layer for primary leak detection/collection\n24 * A 60-mil textured secondary HDPE geomembrane\n25 * A 3-foot-thick low-hydraulic conductivity compacted admix (soil-bentonite) liner\n26 For the bottom lining system, both the primary and secondary liners are a composite (geomembrane over\n27 admix liner or GCL) system. The addition of a GCL in the primary liner layer provides an extra measure\n28 of protection, exceeding the requirements of WAC 173-303-665(2)(h)(i), which stipulates a single\n29 geomembrane for the primary liner and composite for the secondary only. This will provide an extra\n30 measure of protection on the bottom flatter slopes of the IDF, where higher leachate head levels are more\n31 likely.\n32 Drawing H-2-830838 (Detail 2) shows the side slope liner section consisting of the following\n33 components, from top to bottom:\n34 * A 3-foot-thick operations layer\n35 * A CDN drainage layer for primary leachate collection\n36 * A 60-mil textured primary HDPE geomembrane\n37 * A CDN drainage layer for primary leak detection/collection\n38 * A 60-mil textured secondary HDPE geomembrane\n39 * A 3-ft-thick low-hydraulic conductivity admix liner\n40 The side slope lining system is a single geomembrane liner over a composite liner, meeting the\n41 requirements of WAC 173-303-665(2)(h)(i). The 3H:IV side slopes for the IDF will result in little or no\n42 leachate head build-up on the side slope lining system, thus eliminating the need for a lining system\n43 design that exceeds the WAC requirements.\nAppendix 4A. 1.52\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI In general, the liner system consists of two types of materials, geosynthetics and soil/bentonite mixtures\n2 (admix). The geomembranes, geotextiles, and CDN are manufactured from polymeric materials, such as\n3 HDPE, and polypropylene, made from synthetic polymers. The GCL consists of a bentonite layer\n4 sandwiched between two polypropylene geotextiles to assist in placement and construction. The admix\n5 liner is comprised mainly of silt to clay-sized particles, mixed with a silty sand base soil.\n6 5.6.2 Leachate Characterization Assumptions\n7 Several assumptions were made regarding the composition of the leachate concentrations and the\n8 applicability of previously conducted studies for this evaluation. Specifically, the studies considered\n9 directly applicable to this evaluation were:\n10 * Geosynthetic and Soil Liner/Leachate Compatibility Studies for the W-025 Radioactive Mixed\n11 Waste Landfill in Hanford 200 West (Golder Associates, 1991a and 1991b; TRI, 1995; and\n12 WHC, 1995)\n13 * Liner/Leachate Compatibility Study for the U.S. Department of Energy's Idaho National\n14 Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) Comprehensive Environmental Response,\n15 Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) Disposal Facility (ICDF) (DOE-ID, 2002).\n16 Using these studies is considered appropriate for the following reasons:\n17 * The leachate for the IDF is expected to have similar or lower concentrations of radionuclides than\n18 that used in the W025 facility study (since similar waste streams [other than ILAW] may be\n19 accepted).\n20 * The leachate chemistry may be of similar composition to the W025 facility study (since similar\n21 waste streams [other than ILAW] may be accepted).\n22 * Soils used in the W025 facility admix design are similar to those that will be used in the IDF\n23 admix design and will therefore be compatible.\n24 * Similar technical specifications for the geosynthetics and admix liner used in the W025 facility\n25 design will be used in the IDF landfill design.\n26 * A similar technical specification for a GCL used in the ICDF facility will be used in the IDF liner\n27 design.\n28 5.6.2.1 Synthetic Leachate Concentrations for W-025 Landfill\n29 The leachate generated for the W025 evaluation reflects both the waste materials and the stabilization\n30 agents used during waste preparation. Because the landfill will comply with waste acceptance criteria for\n31 WAC dangerous waste and RCRA facilities (as does the IDF), organic materials are not expected to be\n32 present in the waste after processing. The proposed geosynthetic materials are susceptible to damage\n33 from certain organic compounds but generally are not susceptible to damage from inorganic compounds,\n34 even with extreme pH values. As a result, the lack of organic materials results in a relatively benign\n35 leachate.\n36 The source leachate generated for the W025 studies, was primarily based on the waste treatment and\n37 packaging approaches for W025. An aqueous solution of inorganic, with some organic compounds for\n38 conservative evaluation, was generated, resulting in a viscous, slurry-like mixture. This mixture was\n39 placed in a leaching column, and deionized water was introduced to simulate the effects of leachate\n40 generation. Although no organic components were anticipated in the waste, small quantities of benzene,\n41 methanol, and light machine oil were included to simulate the presence of organic compounds in the\n42 waste material.\n43 The source leachate generated through the leachate column process was chemically analyzed with the\n44 following results:\nAppendix 4A.1.53\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * Concentrations of organics benzene and machine oil were below detection limits. Concentrations\n2 of methanol were detected, but at concentrations not considered aggressive for polyester or\n3 HDPE.\n4 * Metals added to the waste were below the detection limits in the source leachate.\n5 * Primary constituents of the source leachate were sodium cations and common inorganic anions,\n6 with a pH of 9.2.\n7 * Based on these results, a synthetic leachate was generated for testing purposes. The source\n8 leachate formula resulted in a solution with total inorganics and dissolved salts of approximately\n9 204,000 mg/L and pH of 9.2 using NaOH or HNO3, as required.\n10 5.6.2.2 Simulated Irradiation Exposure for W-025 Landfill\n11 Samples used to evaluate the effects of radiation were subjected to a 50,000-rad total dose of gamma\n12 radiation. This dose is expected to exceed the maximum level of radiation experienced by geosynthetic\n13 materials in the landfill under unfavorable conditions. Use of a total dose, rather than radiation type, is\n14 considered the primary factor causing damage to polymeric materials and is considered to adequately\n15 simulate actual IDF leachate conditions. Samples and leachate were irradiated together so that any\n16 synergistic effects would be seen. The following samples were included in the irradiation testing:\n17 * Geomembrane\n18 * Geotextile\n19 * Geonet\n20 * Admix (soil/bentonite mixture)\n21 The synthetic leachate and radiation exposure developed from the W-025 studies were used as the basis of\n22 evaluation for the IDF lining system materials. Table 5-2 provides a comparison of the leachate\n23 concentrations for the W-025 project with other studies for which the U.S. Environmental Protection\n24 Agency (EPA) Test Method 9090 were performed on the lining system.\n25 The ICDF project did not include EPA 9090 tests, however, a model for estimating leachate concentration\n26 based on the waste acceptance criteria for the project was developed. The maximum leachate\n27 concentrations and radiation exposure developed for the ICDF (DOE-ID, 2002) based on the anticipated\n28 waste design inventory were as follows:\n29 * Organics-70 mg/1\n30 * Inorganics-18,400 mg/l\n31 * Radiation Exposure-12,000 rads\n32 Table 5-2. EPA Test Method 9090 Compatibility Studies Comparison\nType of Material General 9090b Test Concentrations or\nCompatibility Studya Te Composition of Radiation Exposure that\nTested Leachate Demonstrated Compatibility in\nEach Study\nHanford Liquid Effluent 60-mil smooth HDPE Organics 16.25 mg/L\nRetention Facility (LERF) from four\nmanufacturers\nHanford W-025 Landfill 60-mil smooth HDPE Inorganics 204,210 mg/L\nOrganic Leachate 50,000 rads\nand Radiation\nExposure\npH 9.2\nAppendix 4A.1.54\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nGeneral 9090b Test Concentrations or\nType of Material GnrlRadiation Exposure thatCompatibility Studya Composition of dmontrat e m atTested Leachate Demonstrated Compatibility in\nEach Study\nHanford Grout Facility 60-mil smooth HDPE Inorganics 368,336 mg/L\nOrganic Leachate 37,000,000 rads\nand Radiation\nExposure\npH >14\nKettleman Hills Landfills 60-mil smooth HDPE Organics 93,040 mg/L\nInorganics 250,000 mg/L\npH >12\na. Detailed compatibility test information is provided in Evaluation of Liner/Leachate Chemical Compatibility for the Environmental\nRestoration Disposal Facility report (USACE, 1995).\nb. EPA Test Method 9090 \"Compatibility Test for Wastes and Membrane Liners\" (EPA, 1992c).\nI A review of the studies presented in Table 5-2 leads to the conclusion that the inorganic concentration\n2 developed for the W025 is somewhat conservative as it significantly higher than inorganic concentrations\n3 developed for the ICDF facilities. Other than the W-025 landfill, the ICDF is estimated to be most\n4 similar to the waste type to be received at the IDF of the studies included in Table 5-2. Nonetheless, the\n5 liner/leachate compatibility study for the IDF is based on the W025 synthetic leachate. Further analysis\n6 of the applicability of these leachate concentrations is recommended, if the conservative nature of this\n7 synthetic leachate requires costly revisions to the lining system to demonstrate compatibility.\n8 5.6.3 Chemical and Radiation Resistance\n9 Leachate will be generated from precipitation events and from water added to the waste for dust control\n10 and compaction purposes during operations. In reality, as the landfill nears the end of its operational life,\n11 concentrations of contaminants will decrease with time as the leachable waste mass is reduced. During\n12 the post-closure period, a robust landfill cover will significantly reduce infiltration, and the corresponding\n13 volume of leachate. Soluble contaminants leached from the waste will come in contact with the landfill\n14 bottom liner system during the operation period (approximately 10 years for each of the four planned\n15 phases) and minimum post closure period (30 years). The geosynthetics and admix lining system\n16 components may be in contact with soluble contaminants as long as contaminants are present in the\n17 landfill.\n18 The expected chemical make up of the leachate for the IDF landfill was determined based on previously\n19 conducted compatibility studies (as discussed above) applicable to the same waste stream (the W025\n20 studies), summarized as follows.\n21 5.6.3.1 Geomembrane\n22 HDPE geomembranes can deteriorate from contact with certain leachates, resulting in a decrease of\n23 elongation at failure, an increase in modulus of elasticity, a decrease in the stress at failure, and a loss of\n24 ductility.\n25 Studies performed on polymer materials like HDPE show that their properties begin to change after\n26 absorbing ionizing radiation between 1,000,000 to 10,000,000 rads (Koerner et al., 1990). The HDPE\n27 geomembrane lining the bottom of the landfill will absorb ionizing radiation energy from the leachate\n28 generated in the landfill. Energy will be absorbed during the operational life of the landfill, as long as\n29 there are liquids with ionizing radionuclides in contact with the geomembranes.\n30 Relevant compatibility studies on HDPE geomembranes have been performed for the W-025 Landfill\n31 (Golder, 1991a; TRI, 1995; WHC, 1995). The results of these studies indicate that a HDPE\n32 geomembrane will function well as a liner beneath the landfill waste.\nAppendix 4A.1.55\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 EPA Method 9090 tests performed on HDPE geomembrane for the W-025 landfill, using the synthetic\n2 leachate solution (assumed representative of IDF leachate concentrations) resulted in no evidence of\n3 geomembrane deterioration. A comparison between the anticipated IDF landfill leachate\n4 (W-025 Landfill) and that used in compatibility tests for other facilities is summarized in Table 5-2.\n5 Geomembrane samples tested for the W-025 facility did not produce measurable changes in the HDPE\n6 liner properties when irradiated for 120 days with a total dose of 50,000 rads. HDPE geomembranes are\n7 manufactured with additives, such as carbon black and antioxidants, to improve ductility and durability.\n8 The literature also indicates that these additives allow higher doses than standard HDPE material without\n9 additives (Kircher and Bowman, 1964). The literature indicates that thin films (i.e., 0.002 inches) of\n10 different types of HDPE material alone can become brittle when irradiated at doses between 4,400,000\n11 and 78,000,000 rads. Studies performed using polymer materials, with carbon black and antioxidant\n12 additives, show that properties typically begin to change at a total radiation dose of between 1,000,000\n13 and 10,000,000 rads (Koerner et al., 1990).\n14 The manufacturers of the geosynthetic products proposed for the IDF landfill have published maximum\n15 allowable concentrations of various chemical compounds that can contact the HDPE geomembrane\n16 without adversely affecting its performance. The most recent recommended maximum concentrations of\n17 chemicals were obtained from the manufacturers of HDPE geomembrane (meeting the requirements for\n18 the IDF technical specifications). A list of the manufacturers' maximum allowable concentrations for\n19 specific leachate constituents for HDPE geomembrane and the GCL materials is shown on Table 5-3.\n20 5.6.3.2 Geosynthetic Clay Liner (GCL)\n21 The GCL underlying the geomembrane in the IDF landfill consists of processed sodium bentonite clay,\n22 sandwiched between two geotextile fabrics. Sodium bentonite is an ore comprised mainly of the\n23 montmorillonite clay mineral with broad, flat, negatively charged platelets that attract water, which\n24 hydrates the bentonite. The swelling provides the ability to seal around penetrations, giving the GCL its\n25 self-healing properties. A GCL product with Volclay-type sodium bentonite (manufactured by CETCO)\n26 is specified for installation at the landfill.\n27 The compatibility of GCL materials is usually demonstrated by permeating the material with leachate and\n28 then determining its hydraulic conductivity. Typically, solutions with high concentrations of\n29 contaminants or pure products are allowed to permeate a sample under confining pressure and the\n30 saturated hydraulic conductivity of the material is determined using ASTM methods such as ASTM\n31 D5084. A significant increase in saturated hydraulic conductivity (approximately one order of\n32 magnitude) for a sample permeated with leachate, compared with a sample permeated with water, would\n33 be an indicator of incompatibility.\n34 Based on review of the published studies (Ruhl and Daniel, 1997; Shackelford, et al., 2000; and EPA,\n35 1995), GCLs perform well unless exposed to high concentrations of divalent cations, very acidic or basic\n36 solutions, or solutions with a low dielectric constant (such as gasoline). The leachate expected at the IDF\n37 will have a pH of 9.2, which is a mid-range pH. The studies further demonstrate that, when confined\n38 under a higher normal load (greater than 2000 psf) or if water is the first wetting liquid (Daniel et al.,\n39 1997), GCLs will perform well when exposed to high divalent cation concentrations. The GCL for the\n40 IDF lining system is expected to confine under normal loads in excess of 2000 psf as soon as the first lift\n41 or waste is placed.\n42 No studies were identified that considered the long-term effects of radiation on the physical properties of\n43 GCL materials. Since long-term studies cannot be conducted, conservative radiation limitations have\n44 been employed. Low-hydraulic conductivity soils have been used at multiple DOE facilities containing\n45 radioactive waste. The only known potential adverse reaction that can occur with a GCL is high heat that\n46 could dry out the materials. The amount of radioactivity is expected to be low in the IDF landfill waste\n47 and will not generate a significant amount of heat that can desiccate the admix liner. Also, it is assumed\n48 that the ILAW packages will be cooled to ambient temperatures prior to placement with the cell.\nAppendix 4A.1.56\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI It should be noted that the operations layer and drain gravel will provide a 3-foot buffer on the side slope\n2 and a 4-foot buffer between the liner system and waste for additional thermal protection, if needed.\n3 Sodium bentonite is the primary clay mineral in a GCL that produces the low hydraulic conductivity and\n4 high swell potential. Exposure of sodium bentonite to liquids containing concentrated salts (such as\n5 brines), or divalent cation concentrations (such as Ca++ and Mg++), reduces the swelling potential and\n6 increases its hydraulic conductivity. Concentrated organic solutions (such as hydrocarbons) and strong\n7 acids and bases can break down the soil, which also increases hydraulic conductivity. The physical\n8 mechanism that causes these changes is a reduction of the thickness, and related absorption capacity, of\n9 the diffuse double layer of water molecules surrounding the clay minerals. This results in an effective\n10 decrease in the volume of the clay, since the water molecules are not attracted to the clay particles.\n11 The GCL manufacturer allows the use of GCL with few restrictions on maximum chemical\n12 concentrations. Leachate concentrations for the IDF landfill (based on synthetic leachate from W025)\n13 have relatively high inorganics and dissolved salts. The W025 dissolved salt concentrations are above the\n14 manufacturers recommended concentration of 35,000 mg/L (see Table 5-3) (CETCO, 2001). As a point\n15 of reference, this concentration of dissolved salts is typical of seawater (USGS, 1989). However, the\n16 dissolved salt concentrations in the IDF leachate have been characterized as primarily sodium, and the\n17 synthetic leachate was comprised of entirely sodium salts, not the divalent cations such as Ca++ and\n18 Mg++, as assumed by the manufacturers. As such, the impact on GCL hydraulic conductivity should be\n19 less as compared to divalent cation solutions. Additionally, any effects of leachate degradation on the\n20 GCL would be minimized by hydration of the GCLs' sodium bentonite with relatively \"fresh\" water,\n21 allowing the GCL to swell initially and decrease hydraulic conductivity.\n22 The rationale for use of the GCL in the IDF landfill primary liner is to \"deflect\" leachate from defects or\n23 pinholes in the geomembrane over the bottom area and longer-term storage areas (such as the leachate\n24 sump trough), where leachate head potential is greatest. The main purpose of the primary GCL is to\n25 reduce the actual leakage rate into the LDS in the event of leak in the primary geomembrane (see\n26 Section 5.10 and Appendix C.10). The GCL is expected to contact leachate only in the event of a leak in\n27 the primary geomembrane. These leachate collection and storage areas are subject to flushing throughout\n28 the active life of the landfill due to phased development and fill sequence, resulting in a more dilute\n29 leachate in leakage areas prior to attaining maximum leachate concentrations. Based on these\n30 considerations, the GCL and landfill liner system approach should perform as intended under the\n31 anticipated conditions.\n32 5.6.3.3 Admix Liner\n33 The admix layer consists of onsite silty sand mixed with processed bentonite amendment, similar to that\n34 used in the construction of GCLs. The swelling of sodium bentonite provides the ability to seal around\n35 soil particles, giving the admix a low hydraulic conductivity and self-healing properties. The\n36 compatibility of the admix layer with anticipated irradiation and leachate concentrations were evaluated\n37 previously as part of the W025 landfill design (Golder Associates, 1991b). The following summarizes the\n38 results of the compatibility testing for the admix layer that are directly applicable to the IDF landfill\n39 admix liner, since similar materials will be used in construction. More detailed discussion of the IDF\n40 admix liner design is provided in Section 5.4.\n41 In the W025 study, samples of the admix were irradiated, similar to that conducted for the geomembrane\n42 layer, as discussed previously. Differences between irradiated and non-irradiated samples were not\n43 considered significant based on the results of testing.\n44 The initial W025 admix design contained approximately 8 percent bentonite clay. Testing indicated an\n45 acceptable hydraulic conductivity of this admix after hydration in fresh water. However, when hydrated\n46 in leachate, some hydraulic conductivity test values were twice the allowable limit and, therefore, this\n47 admix formulation was not considered acceptable. This is the same leachate chemistry assumed for the\n48 IDF landfill.\nAppendix 4A.1.57\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI It should be noted that there are two factors not considered in the W025 compatibility study (Golder\n2 Associates, 199 1b) that would mitigate the impact of the synthetic leachate on the 8 percent admix\n3 samples, as listed below:\n4 Effective stress for samples-hydraulic conductivity tests were performed with effective stresses of 5-10\n5 psi across sample (equivalent to less than one full lift of ILAW packages). It is well documented that\n6 higher effective stresses will lower hydraulic conductivity and mitigate the effects of shrinking/cracking\n7 in clay under attack from chemicals. In reality, by the time any leachate contacts the lining system, there\n8 will be a substantial stress load on the liner that will mitigate the impacts of chemicals in leachate on the\n9 admix liner.\n10 First wetting liquid-W025 tests were performed using both site water and synthetic leachate as the\n11 initial wetting fluid. It is well documented that if a clay soil is \"attacked\" by inorganics prior to\n12 saturation, the increase in hydraulic conductivity will be more dramatic than if water is first permeant.\n13 This was confirmed by W025 testing-there was an order of magnitude difference between samples with\n14 water as first wetting liquid as opposed to leachate. It is reasonable to expect something closer to water\n15 than concentrated leachate will be the first wetting liquid for the IDF admix liner.\n16 Due to the results in the W025 testing showing greater than acceptable hydraulic conductivity in the\n17 admix when exposed to the W025 synthetic leachate, the bentonite percentage was increased from 8 to\n18 12 percent. An admix containing 12 percent bentonite clay was permeated with synthetic leachate and\n19 tested with a resulting hydraulic conductivity that was 3 to 10 times lower than the maximum allowable\n20 limit (10-7 cm/sec). This admix formulation was considered acceptable with respect to W025 leachate\n21 compatibility and is applicable to the IDF. Thus, the technical specifications (see Section 02666) require\n22 a nominal 12 percent (range from 11 to 14 percent is acceptable) bentonite by weight for the admix liner.\n23 Consideration should be given to lowering the bentonite percentage upon further characterization of the\n24 IDF leachate and applicability of the mitigating factors discussed above.\n25 5.6.3.4 Other Materials\n26 Other materials for which compatibility needs to be addressed are the CDN and geotextiles (cushion,\n27 separation, and bonded to geonet of CDN). While these materials do not serve a barrier function, they\n28 provide either for removal of leachate or protection of the lining system and must continue to function\n29 when exposed to leachate.\n30 During the W025 design, the effect of the synthetic leachate on the geonet core of the CDN and the\n31 geotextiles was evaluated (Golder Associates, 1991 a). The study concluded that a geonet core comprised\n32 of HDPE provided adequate chemical and radiation resistance. For geotextiles, the study concluded that\n33 geotextiles made of polyester fabric were susceptible to degradation and recommended that geotextile\n34 material be limited to a more chemically resistant material such as polypropylene. The technical\n35 specifications for the IDF require that geotextiles be made from polypropylene (see Section 02371); thus,\n36 the geotextiles used for the IDF should have adequate chemical and radiation resistance.\n37 Table 5-3. Maximum Allowable Concentrations in Leachate by Chemical Category for\n38 Geosynthetic Components\nCompatible Compatible\nConcentration for Concentration for IDF Concentration\nChemical Category HDPE GCL Dose or Value\nOrganics 500,000a mg/L 500,000b mg/L N/A\nAcids and Bases 750,000a mg/L 500,000b mg/L Od mg/L\nInorganic 500,000a mg/L 500,000b mg/L 204,000 mg/Lc\nDissolved Salts No Limit 35,000a mg/L 204,000 mg/Lc\nStrong Oxidizers 1,000 mg/L No limit 0 d mg/L\nRadionuclides 1,000,000b rads No limit 50,000 radsc\nPH 0.5 -13.0a 0.5 -13.0 9.2\nAppendix 4A. 1.58\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI a. Based on the typical manufacturers' maximum concentration of the list of constituents by the manufacturers.\n2 b. Based on reported literature values.\n3 c. Based on synthetic leachate formula for W-025\n4 d. Strong acids, bases, or oxidizing compounds were not identified in the W-025 compatibility studies.\n5 5.7 Drainage Layer\n6 The drainage layer for the LCRS consists of three components: the separation geotextile, the CDN, and\n7 the drainage gravel. Analyses for the drainage layer required evaluation of these components.\n8 5.7.1 Geotextile Analyses (Separation)\n9 Analyses were preformed to verify that a separation geotextile between the operations layer and leachate\n10 collection drain gravel is required by evaluating natural graded filter criteria for these materials. Results\n11 indicated that natural filter criteria could not be achieved, thus a separation geotextile is required between\n12 the operations layer and drain gravel. Supporting natural filter calculations are included in\n13 Appendix C.6.a.\n14 Analyses were conducted to determine the proper apparent opening size (AOS) and permittivity of the\n15 separation geotextile. Required AOS and permittivity were determined based on filter, fines retention,\n16 and clogging potential criteria. Results of these analyses were used to develop the technical specifications\n17 for the separation geotextile (see Section 02371). Supporting geotextile filter calculations are also\n18 included in Appendix C.6.A.\n19 5.7.2 CDN Selection\n20 The CDN selection was based on analysis of two design issues, CDN geotextile puncture resistance and\n21 CDN required transmissivity.\n22 5.7.2.1 CDN Geotextile Puncture Resistance\n23 The LCRS CDN layer at the IDF will be overlain by the operations layer on the 3H: IV side slope. The\n24 operations layer is allowed to contain a particle size up to 2 inches in dimension. An analysis was\n25 performed to determine if the geotextile bonded to geonet (to form the CDN) would be punctured by\n26 particles/rocks of this size.\n27 The method developed by Koerner (1998) was used to calculate the puncture resistance. Koerner's\n28 method considers the size and shape of the rock, as well as other factors that could decrease the long-term\n29 strength of the geotextile. The two loading conditions examined were initial placement of the operations\n30 layer and the final depth of waste and closure cover. The geomembrane puncture resistance analysis (see\n31 Section 5.5.4) provides the details for the load analysis for these conditions. Detailed calculations for\n32 CDN geotextile puncture resistance and corresponding cushion geotextile requirements are included in\n33 Appendix C.6.bl.\n34 Results of the analyses indicate that the required puncture resistance is 11.2 lbs. The minimum specified\n35 value for Type I geotextile (see technical specifications, Section 02371) is 65 lbs. Applying a partial\n36 safety factor of 2 gives a minimum resistance of 32.5 lbs. Therefore, the proposed geotextile bonded to\n37 the geonet of the CDN will resist puncture with a global safety factor of 2.9; it is adequate for resistance\n38 to puncture from the overlying operations layer under the pressure of maximum landfill contents pressure.\n39 Koerner (1998) recommends a minimum global safety factor of 2.0.\n40 It should be noted that the results of this analysis are considered conservative because the analytical\n41 method assumes only a uniform particle size and does not take the surrounding soil matrix into\n42 consideration. This would effectively reduce the particle size by a considerable degree.\n43 5.7.2.2 CDN Required Transmissivity\n44 An additional selection criteria for the CDN is the required transmissivity (or flow rate) under design\n45 loading conditions. For the IDF two cases require analysis:\nAppendix 4A.1.59\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI LDS CDN on bottom and side slope-For this case, the critical condition is to ensure that the\n2 transmissivity as required by WAC and EPA regulations (3 x 10-5 m2/sec) under the maximum load from\n3 the landfill contents can be achieved.\n4 LCRS CDN on side slope only-There are actually two loading conditions for the LCRS CDN on the side\n5 slope. One is the open slope condition with operations layer only over the CDN, which is a low normal\n6 load (1,000 psf) condition. The second is in the filled condition, which is a high normal load (15,000 psf)\n7 condition. Based on the results of leachate production analyses using the Hydrologic Evaluation of\n8 Landfill Performance (HELP) model (see Section 5.8), the required transmissivity for the LCRS CDN is\n9 6.5 x 10-5 m2/sec for the open slope condition and 1 x 10-5 m2/sec for the filled condition.\n10 For each case, the approach was to compare the required transmissivity to typical manufacturer's data\n11 with test conditions (i.e., normal load and material boundary), similar to the design conditions. The\n12 allowable transmissivity (<p) was determined using guidance provided by GRI standard GC-8 (2001),\n13 Determination of the Allowable Flow Rate of a Drainage Geocomposite. The GRI-GC8 standard uses the\n14 following equation:\n15 (Pallow 9100 hr test/Reduction Factors for intrusion, creep, chemical clogging and biological clogging\n16 The FS for design was then determined as follows:\n17 FS (Pallow/(Prequired\n18 Transmissivity data for the 100-hour test data was obtained from the manufacturer for both 200-mil and\n19 250-mil thickness CDN for normal loads of both 1,000 psf and 15,000 psf. Test data was provided for a\n20 number of boundary conditions including flow tests between a geomembrane and a soil, as would be the\n21 case for the LCRS or LDS CDN. Test data used as the basis for the analyses are included with the\n22 calculations presented in Appendix C.6.b2.\n23 Based on the analyses, a higher flow, thicker (250-mil minimum) CDN is required, due to the reduction of\n24 flow under the high normal loads in the final filling configuration. The technical specifications (see\n25 Section 02373) provide the required index values for the geonet core of the CDN as well as the CDN\n26 itself (with geotextile bonded to both sides of the geonet), based on the results of this analysis. The\n27 transmissivity requirements in the technical specifications are index values and not in-service condition\n28 values, as determined in this analysis. These index values are representative of testing that manufacturers\n29 typically perform in production and are correlated to design conditions using the approach outlined in\n30 GRI GC-8.\n31 5.7.3 Drainage Gravel Selection\n32 Section 02315 (Fill and Backfill) in the technical specifications requires that drain gravel meets the\n33 requirements of WSDOT 9-03.12(4) for gradation. The technical specifications also require a\n34 performance specification for a hydraulic conductivity greater or equal to 10-1 cm/sec.\n35 Hydraulic conductivity of the specified drain gravel was estimated using two different empirical\n36 relationships. The most relevant of the two estimates a minimum hydraulic conductivity of I cm/sec,\n37 based on the specified gradation curve for WSDOT Gravel Backfill for Drains (9-03.12[4]). Supporting\n38 calculations are included in Appendix C.6.c.\n39 The minimum estimated hydraulic conductivity for the drain gravel exceeds the required (by WAC and\n40 EPA regulations) hydraulic conductivity of 10-2 cm/sec by a factor or 100 to 1,000, and the performance\n41 specification hydraulic conductivity of 10-1 cm/sec by a factor of 10 to 100. This exceedance makes an\n42 allowance for two items: (1) it allows for the uncertainty in the empirical formulas used to predict\n43 hydraulic conductivity, and (2) it also allows for the potential long-term reduction in hydraulic\n44 conductivity in the drain gravel as fines from waste filling and the operations layer migrate into the gravel\n45 over time.\nAppendix 4A.1.60\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 As part of Construction QA, testing it is recommended that samples of imported drain gravel be tested for\n2 conformance with the gradation and hydraulic conductivity requirements in the technical specifications.\n3 5.8 Leachate Production\n4 5.8.1 Leachate Production Analyses\n5 Estimates of the amount of leachate produced during the development and operation of the IDF were\n6 needed to design the components of the leachate collection and conveyance system described in Section\n7 5.9, and to provide information necessary when evaluating slope stability of the side slope and bottom\n8 liner systems. Leachate is produced when precipitation falls within the lined area and infiltrates vertically\n9 through the waste and/or bottom liner system. The amount of infiltration estimated to occur depends on\n10 the hydrologic processes and the relative fraction of precipitation that results as leachate and is collected\n11 by the leachate collection system.\n12 The water balance components of the hydrologic process were estimated using EPA's Hydrologic\n13 Evaluation of Landfill Performance (HELP) Model (Schroeder et. al., 1997), a well known standard for\n14 water balance modeling. The HELP model has been widely used for evaluating hydrologic conditions\n15 and is the standard model used for providing information necessary for the design of landfill systems.\n16 Estimates of the water balance components of the hydrologic cycle provided by HELP include\n17 precipitation, evapotranspiration, surface water runoff, vertical percolation, soil moisture storage, and\n18 lateral drainage in soil layers.\n19 The HELP model requires input of weather data, representing the conditions at the landfill location, soils\n20 data representing the various layers of cover soils, waste materials, and soils underlying the waste layers,\n21 and other design data used by the model for water balance calculations. A detailed description of the\n22 model and modeling inputs are included in Appendix C.7.\n23 The development of the IDF from Phase I through Phase IV was considered to determine the maximum\n24 flow condition expected during development and operation of the landfill. That is, various combinations\n25 of open and interim closed phases were considered and the combination calculated to produce the\n26 maximum amount of leachate was chosen for analysis. The chosen combination was Phase I through III\n27 under interim closure condition and Phase IV in the open condition with little or no waste present. The\n28 flows from this condition were used to size the LCRS collection piping and pump systems.\n29 Water balance components were taken directly from model output and a spreadsheet was used to calculate\n30 the volumes of leachate by multiplying the HELP output parameter by the area of the type of system\n31 modeled. For example, the lateral drainage estimated by the HELP model for the uncovered side slope\n32 condition in Phase IV development was multiplied by the total side slope area to determine the total\n33 volume of leachate from that area. A spreadsheet summarizing the estimated leachate flows is included in\n34 Appendix C.7.\n35 The following modeling results were used for various aspects of design of the IDF systems:\n36 LCRS collection system-Modeling results for the peak day event were used to size the leachate\n37 collection system piping that conveys flow to the LCRS systems. The peak day event, as predicted by\n38 HELP and referenced herein, was a 1.6-inch precipitation event. This event is approximately 25 percent\n39 higher than the 25 year, 24 hour peak day storm event of 1.28 inches (Appendix C.9), required by\n40 regulations to be used when complying with the maximum 12 inches of head over the liner\n41 (WAC 173-303-665, see Section 2). The spacing of the LCRS perforated collection piping and the\n42 properties of the drain gravel material that convey lateral drainage flows above the bottom liner\n43 geomembrane to the collection piping and LCRS sump area were checked to insure the maximum head\n44 buildup above the sump area of the liner system did not exceed the maximum allowed according to\n45 regulatory requirements, as outlined in Section 2.\n46 LCRS pump and forcemain systems-Modeling results for the peak day event were used to size the\n47 LCRS high flow pump system that conveys flow to the leachate storage tanks and truck loadout facilities.\nAppendix 4A.1.61\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Average monthly flow rates plus one standard deviation (resulting in a conservatively-high expected flow\n2 rate) was used to design the LCRS low flow pump system for pumping from the IDF during average\n3 monthly conditions.\n4 Leachate Collection Storage-Volumes for the peak day event and assumptions for the operational rate\n5 of removal of leachate from the tanks were used to size the storage tanks. Storage tank sizing is described\n6 in Section 5.9.2.2.\n7 Liner system material properties and stability analyses-The lateral drainage layers of the side slope\n8 and bottom liner systems were checked to insure the transmissivity of the layers was sufficient to convey\n9 lateral flows and maintain less than the maximum head buildup over the liner system. The seepage height\n10 above the liner was used when checking the liner system for veneer stability.\n11 5.9 Leachate Collection System\n12 5.9.1 Earth Loading Analyses\n13 5.9.1.1 Leachate System Loading Analyses for Piping within Phase I Liner Limits\n14 Loading over the leachate system piping include all layers of soil materials, wastes, and anticipated traffic\n15 loading. The maximum loading occurs over the piping in the LCRS and LDS sump area, because of its\n16 low elevation and the height of material-both waste and soil layers-overlying the sumps. Loading\n17 calculations from the geosynthetic liner puncture resistance calculations described in Section 5.5.4 were\n18 modified to represent the maximum loading in the LCRS/LDS sump area. Other pipes in the Phase I\n19 area, including piping outside the sump and the side slope riser piping, will be subjected to less than the\n20 maximum loading. The maximum loading is listed in Appendix C.8.a, along with the calculations for\n21 pipe sizing required to withstand this anticipated pipe loading.\n22 Pipe wall thickness was selected based on the maximum loading anticipated in the sump area such that\n23 the pipe will not fail due to excessive deflection, wall buckling, or wall crushing. All other piping in\n24 Phase I outside of the sump area was chosen with the same standard dimension ratio (SDR) to withstand\n25 the maximum load. Standard analysis methods, as recommended by the manufacturer of HDPE pipe\n26 made from PE3408 type resin, were used to evaluate pipe strength under loading. These standard\n27 methods are based on flexible pipe design practice as applied to HDPE piping. The manufacturer's\n28 recommended design analysis techniques are based on standard analysis techniques, including the Iowa\n29 formula (Waste Containment Systems, Waste Stabilization, and Landfills Design and Evaluation, Sharma\n30 and Lewis, 1994), with conservative factors of safety. The potential loss of strength due to the\n31 perforations in the perforated collection piping was assumed non-significant, based on actual test results\n32 of perforated pipe under similar load rates. The pipe material assumed is High Density Polyethylene\n33 PE3408 pipe with a cell classification of 345434C or better. The flexural modulus and material strength\n34 of the pipe was per manufacturer's published literature, based on this classification of pipe.\n35 5.9.1.2 Leachate System Loading Analyses for Piping Outside of Phase I Liner Limits\n36 Piping outside the Phase I liner area includes all underground piping between the crest pad building,\n37 combined sump, leachate transfer building, storage tank, and tanker truck load out facility (see Drawing\n38 H-2-830846). The civil road layout in these areas is generally configured to allow medium to light duty\n39 trucks, such as would be used for operations and maintenance activities. The leachate tanker truck\n40 accesses the concrete truck load pad only, and would not normally pass over any piping. However, the\n41 piping outside the Phase I Liner area was designed for H-20 semi-trailer type loading to be conservative.\n42 The same SDR pipe that used for the high loading within the Phase I liner limits as described in Section\n43 5.9.1.1 was assumed for all piping exposed to earth and traffic loading outside of the Phase I liner limits.\n44 The expected pipe loading for H-20 loading plus earth load was compared to the loading used for\n45 designing the piping inside the Phase I liner limits and was found to be much lower. Since the pipe SDR\n46 is sufficiently strong for the maximum loading inside the Phase I limits, it will have more than sufficient\n47 strength for loading expected outside the Phase I limits. Calculations are included in Appendix C.8.a.\nAppendix 4A. 1.62\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 5.9.2 Leachate System Hydraulics Analyses\n2 5.9.2.1 Leachate System Hydraulics Analyses\n3 The leachate collection and conveyance system collects leachate that accumulates as a result of\n4 precipitation landing within the footprint of the cells, and it conveys the collected leachate from the cells\n5. to a storage tank or tanker truck. Perforated collection piping in the LCRS collects and conveys leachate\n6 from the bottom liner system and conveys it to a LCRS sump area in both cells. Lateral flow of leachate\n7 from the side slope and bottom liner areas also is conveyed directly to the sump area through a high\n8 permeability gravel layer and/or geosynthetic drainage net material. Submersible pumps in the LCRS\n9 sump and contained within perforated riser pipes convey leachate to the crest pad building and directly to\n10 the leachate storage tank or the tanker truck load facility. Hydraulics analysis was conducted to size the\n11 gravity flow piping of the LCRS collection piping and the pump and force main system from the sump\n12 area to the storage tank and tanker truck load facility. Sizing and design of leachate collection and\n13 conveyance systems were based on ultimate build out of the IDF through Phase IV. That is, the\n14 components installed as part of the Phase I design are sized for the ultimate configuration and flows\n15 estimated through Phase IV.\n16 5.9.2.2 LCRS Gravity Flow Analyses\n17 The LCRS perforated collection piping was sized using standard gravity flow analysis techniques. The\n18 pipe size (nominal 12-inch diameter) was chosen as double the minimum size required for cleanout of the\n19 pipe to insure any accumulation of fines would not significantly restrict the flow in the pipe, even though\n20 the drain gravel surrounding the pipe will have minimal fines present and geotextiles are present in the\n21 lining system to further restrict the migration of any fines. The maximum flow used for sizing was the\n22 maximum from the HELP predicted maximum day flow rate or the pump flow rate, based on the pump\n23 chosen to convey flow out of the cell.\n24 Perforations in the pipe were sized to allow flow rates much higher than the required maximum flow rate\n25 out of the cell, with minimal head loss. This assumption was more conservative by virtue of the fact that\n26 the main LCRS collection pipe will only collect and convey a portion of the lateral drainage flow from the\n27 cell; the drain gravel and CDN will also convey a portion of the flow. Calculations are included in\n28 Appendix C.8.b.\n29 5.9.2.3 Leachate System Pumps and Force Mains Analyses\n30 The pump and forcemain systems for conveying leachate out of the cells and into the leachate storage\n31 tanks and to the tanker truck load out facility,. and the design considerations for each are described below.\n32 Calculations are included in Appendix C.8.b.\n33 LCRS pumps and forcemains-The LCRS pumps and forcemains convey leachate out of the cells to\n34 storage tanks or the tanker truck load areas. The criteria for pumping capacity is that the maximum head\n35 over the sump area of the cell will not be allowed to exceed 12 inches during the peak day event and\n36 during normal operations. To meet the requirement for not exceeding the 12-inch criteria for the peak day\n37 event, a LCRS high flow pump was sized to handle the expected peak day flow rate, as estimated and\n38 described in Section 5.8, Leachate Production. Hydraulic analyses were conducted to size the pump and\n39 forcemain piping according to standard practice to convey the maximum flow rate.\n40 A LCRS low flow pump was sized to convey flow out of the cells under normal, monthly operations. The\n41 criteria established for the low flow pump was to convey the average monthly flow plus one standard\n42 deviation from the cells, assuming the pump could remove that amount of flow with less than continuous\n43 operation. The highest value of the average month plus one standard deviation was used for the\n44 maximum flow required of the pump. Under lower flow required conditions, the pump would operate\n45 near this rate, depending on the system curve head loss characteristics, but would run for a shorter length\n46 of time to remove the volume of leachate from the cell.\n47\nAppendix 4A. 1.63\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 LDS pump and forcemain-The LDS pump and forcemain conveys flows from leakage through the\n2 LCRS sump area, if in the unlikely event any leakage occurs, to the storage tank or tanker truck load out\n3 facility. The LDS system is sized to convey the flow equal to the ALR (described in Section 5.11);\n4 however, this rate is so small that the pump capacity is much higher than necessary.\n5 Leachate transfer pump to truckload and forcemain-Under normal operations, leachate conveyed out\n6 of the IDF will be routed to the leachate storage tank. Periodically the leachate will need to be conveyed\n7 to tanker trucks for transport to an offsite water treatment facility. A transfer pump is required to move\n8 water from the storage tank to the tanker truck loadout facility. The pump and forcemain were sized to\n9 convey approximately 250 gallons per minute (gpm), a rate commensurate with timely loading of the\n10 tanker trucks that have capacities equal to approximately 7,000 gallons. At 250 gpm, the tankers can be\n11 loaded quickly, depending on the operational requirements for moving leachate and making storage tank\n12 capacity available under high precipitation conditions and/or the condition when the storage tanks are at\n13 or near capacity. Storage and operations considerations are described in Section 5.9.2.4.\n14 Combined sump pump and forcemain-The combined sump pump and forcemain must convey flow\n15 from the sump to the leachate storage tank. The flow criteria for this pump was set at approximately the\n16 same flow as the leachate transfer pump. This is based on the worst case scenario of the leachate transfer\n17 pump accidentally being left on when the tanker truck is filled, causing the full 250 gpm flow to overflow\n18 the truck, collect on the pad, and drain into the combined sump. Under less than maximum flow\n19 conditions, the pump would cycle when any leakage from other systems connected to the sump pump\n20 reached the level on control setting for the pump. In this case, the pump would cycle quickly to pump the\n21 small volume of the inner sump into the storage tank.\n22 Crest pad building sump pump-A small sump pump is provided in the crest pad building to remove\n23 minor amounts of water in the sump from sampling activities or piping leaks. The nominal flow rate was\n24 chosen as a minimum of four gpm. The pump discharges into the main forcemain line to the storage tank\n25 or tanker truck load out facility.\n26 The pump and forcemain piping systems were modeled using standard hydraulic analysis techniques.\n27 Actual pump curves for preliminary pump selections were input and the analyses conducted to determine\n28 the estimated run condition for the various operational conditions. For example, a pump was chosen for\n29 the LCRS high flow pump and forcemain system, and the analysis was run for the conditions of the pump\n30 conveying flow to the leachate storage tank and directly to the tanker truck load out facility. Different\n31 flow rates and system pressures resulted, based on the differences in the system curve for each flow path\n32 versus the pump curve characteristics. Pump cycle times were considered for the flow requirements and\n33 total removed volume. The manufacturer's recommendations for cycle times and other operating\n34 requirements, where applicable, were checked.\n35 5.9.2.4 Leachate Collection Storage Analyses\n36 The results of the leachate production analysis indicate a total of approximately 269,000 gallons of\n37 leachate must be removed from the IDF landfill within 24 hours after a peak storm event. A temporary\n38 storage tank for each cell was sized to store leachate generated by the associated cell. The leachate\n39 storage tank capacity is dependent on the flow rate of leachate into and out of the tank as well as a factor\n40 of safety.\n41 The leachate production analysis indicates the worst case flow rate out of each cell into the associated\n42 tank would be 157 gpm (sum of the required flow rates of the high and low flow leachate pumps). The\n43 leachate transfer pump for each cell can fill a tanker truck at a maximum of 250 gpm; however, the\n44 limiting factor is how often a truck can be filled.\n45 The calculation in Appendix C.8.c presents the method of determining the appropriate storage capacity of\n46 each leachate storage tank. The following leachate tanker truck loading activities were assumed:\n47 * Tanker Capacity 7,000 gallons\n48 * Number of tankers per cycle 1\nAppendix 4A. 1.64\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * Hours per cycle (roundtrip) 2.4\n2 * Hours per shift 8\n3 * Shifts per day 1\n4 * Leachate tank level prior to event 2 feet\n5 The calculation indicates that each tank requires a maximum operational capacity of 375,000 gallons to\n6 maintain a safety factor of 1.5. The assumptions made in the calculation must be adhered to during\n7 operational activities to maintain the calculated safety factor.\n8 5.10 Surface Stormwater\n9 The surface stormwater analysis was done to determine the sizes of the surface stormwater facilities\n10 necessary for the IDF Phase I Critical Systems Design. The surface stormwater analysis is documented in\n11 detail in Appendix C.9.\n12 The governing regulation is WAC 173-303-665(2) (c) and (d). This requires that the stormwater system\n13 be designed to prevent flow onto the active portion of the landfill during peak discharge from at least a\n14 25-year storm. It also requires that the runoff management system be designed to collect and control at\n15 least the water volume resulting from a 24-hour, 25-year storm.\n16 The primary purpose of the proposed stormwater facilities is to prevent stormwater runoff from areas\n17 adjacent to the two Phase I cells from entering the cells during Phase I operation. This will be done by\n18 collecting, conveying, and safely discharging stormwater from areas outside of the two Phase I cells that\n19 would otherwise run into these cells.\n20 The Department of Ecology has issued State Waste Discharge Permit Number ST 4510 for industrial\n21 stormwater discharges to the ground through engineered land disposal structures on the Hanford site (ST\n22 4510, Ecology, 1999; DOE/RL97-67 Revision 3, January 2000). Since the design for this project does\n23 include facilities for collecting stormwater runoff and discharging it to the ground, the permit was\n24 reviewed to determine whether it applied to these stormwater discharges. To be covered by this permit,\n25 the stormwater must be considered an industrial discharge that is collected in an engineered structure and\n26 is then discharged to the ground through an engineered structure. A stormwater discharge is an industrial\n27 discharge if the stormwater has the potential to come into contact with an industrial activity or is collected\n28 within an area of industrial activity. The purpose of the stormwater facilities that have been designed for\n29 this project is to prevent the stormwater from areas outside of the Phase I landfill from entering the\n30 landfill area. Therefore, the stormwater collected by these facilities would probably not be considered\n31 industrial stormwater. To be an engineered structure for the collection of stormwater, the structure has to\n32 be an impervious surface that is directly associated with industrial activities. The stormwater collection\n33 facilities designed for this project do not have impervious surfaces. Therefore, permit ST 4510 does not\n34 apply to the stormwater system designed for this project.\n35 Stormwater facilities were designed only for the operation stage of Phase I and not for interim or final\n36 closure conditions. Therefore, no stormwater facilities have been designed for stormwater runoff from\n37 the Phase I cells after construction of their interim closure or final closure. Stormwater needs for the\n38 construction, operation, and closure of future phases were not considered.\n39 No stormwater collection and conveyance facilities were analyzed and/or designed for any of the roads\n40 and support facilities that will be constructed as part of this project. The roads will be gravel surfaced,\n41 and stormwater that does run off the roads into adjacent areas will infiltrate. The stormwater from the\n42 roofs of the buildings will be caught in gutters and discharged to the ground surface via down spouts.\n43 The stormwater that falls on the leachate tanks will evaporate off the floating covers.\n44 5.10.1 Existing Conditions\n45 Under existing conditions, the area around the Phase I site slopes down gently from south to north at an\n46 average grade of approximately 0.5 percent.\nAppendix 4A.1.65\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI The only area that may generate stormwater that can run into the Phase I excavation is the area that\n2 extends south from the excavation area to the crest of the sand dunes, located north of 1st Street (see\n3 drainage areas figure in Appendix C.9). This drainage area is moderately vegetated, primarily with large\n4 sage brush and grasses. The soils are generally sandy, with relatively high rates of infiltration. This area\n5 typically receives little precipitation. There is little to no runoff, and stormwater normally either\n6 infiltrates or is used by the vegetation. No existing drainage channels are apparent. The groundwater\n7 table is approximately 300 feet below the ground surface.\n8 5.10.2 Proposed Stormwater Facilities\n9 To prevent stormwater from the area south of the Phase I excavation from running overland into the\n10 excavation, a combination stormwater berm/ditch will be constructed south of the top of the south slope\n11 of the excavation. The south end of the excavation will be approximately 1,400 feet long, and the ground\n12 will be essentially flat. The berm/ditch will have a center high point and then slope down to the east and\n13 to the west (two discharge points). A berm will be constructed immediately south of the ditch. At the\n14 centerline of the excavation, the invert of the ditch will be at the existing ground surface, and the berm\n15 will form the south slope of the ditch. The ditch will be excavated, with a longitudinal slope of\n16 0.5 percent to both the east and the west. This will be done in order to minimize the depth of the ditch at\n17 its east and west ends. Culverts will be installed at the east and west ditch ends to convey the flow under\n18 the access roads. The culverts will discharge into the east and west infiltration areas.\n19 The base map does not show any areas where stormwater runoff from offsite areas may flow into the east\n20 or west boundaries of the Phase I excavation. However, if any offsite stormwater should flow toward\n21 these boundaries, the fill for the berm access road and the shine berm will prevent the stormwater from\n22 flowing into the excavation (see drainage areas figure in Appendix C.9). The intercepted stormwater will\n23 flow south along the toe of the fill and either infiltrate or flow overland to the north, away from the site at\n24 the north end of the berm access road.\n25 The ground slopes away from the north end of the Phase I site, so there will be no offsite stormwater\n26 running toward the north Phase I boundary.\n27 The Phase I liner will end north of the toe of the south slope of the Phase I excavation. In order to reduce\n28 potential leachate flows, a stormwater berm/ditch will be constructed just south of the south end of the\n29 liner. This berm/ditch will intercept and convey stormwater runoff from the unlined south slope and the\n30 unlined southern ends of the east and west slopes. The berm/ditch will be sloped to drain to the east. A\n31 stormwater pipe will convey the stormwater under the landing for the access ramp and will discharge to\n32 the excavation infiltration area. If this pipe ran straight from the ditch to the infiltration area, it would not\n33 have adequate cover. Therefore, a catch basin with a solid cover will be installed near the west end of the\n34 stormwater pipe. The invert of the pipe out of the catch basin will be lower than that of the pipe running\n35 into this catch basin. The stormwater pipe that will run from the catch basin to the excavation infiltration\n36 area will then have adequate cover. The excavation infiltration area will be excavated in the southeast\n37 corner of the excavation.\n38 The south edge of the access ramp into the Phase I excavation and the south edge of the \"flat\" area at the\n39 bottom of the access ramp will serve as ditches. The access ramp will have a cross-slope of 2 percent\n40 down to the south. The \"flat\" area at the bottom of the access ramp will have a slope down to the south\n41 that varies between I and 3 percent. Adjacent to each of these will be the south slope of the excavation.\n42 Construction of a full V-shaped ditch along the south side of the access ramp and the \"flat\" area was\n43 considered. This idea was rejected because it would result in a larger excavation with the top of the Phase\n44 I south slope moved further south.\n45 The stormwater facilities are shown on the Phase I Grading and Drainage Plan drawing\n46 (Drawing H-2-830830).\n47 Stormwater runoff from the north, east, and west lined slopes of Phase I will run into the bottom lined\n48 area and will become leachate.\nAppendix 4A.1.66\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI There are no provisions in the design of the Phase I critical systems to divert clean runoff from these side\n2 slopes and discharge it to the surface water system instead of the leachate system at this time. However, a\n3 rain curtain or other approach to reduce the amount of clean runoff from the lined area that enters the\n4 leachate system may be considered in the future.\n5 5.10.3 Analysis\n6 The surface stormwater analysis is documented in Appendix C.9 and is summarized below.\n7 Stormwater runoff flows were estimated for a 24-hour, 25-year design event, using the Soil Conservation\n8 Service curve number methodology as documented in Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds (U.S.\n9 Department of Agriculture, June 1986) and the Hydraulic Engineering Cirular-1 (HEC-1) computer\n10 program (Flood Hydrograph Package (HEC-1), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Hydrologic Engineering\n11 Center, revised June 1988). The precipitation data used was based on information from the Hanford Site\n12 Climatological Data Summary 2001 (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, May 2002). The ground at\n13 the project site is periodically frozen during the winter months, when the most precipitation falls.\n14 Therefore, it was assumed that the ground was frozen for the runoff flow calculations.\n15 The peak flows (calculated using the HEC-1 model) were checked for reasonableness. The tabular and\n16 graphical methods in TR 55 were used to estimate peak 25-year flows for each of the drainage areas\n17 modeled in HEC-1. The results confirmed the reasonableness of the peak flows calculated by HEC-1.\n18 The berm/ditches were designed to convey the peak 25-year flow with a minimum freeboard of one foot.\n19 The infiltration areas were sized based on containing and infiltrating the runoff from the 24-hour, 25-year\n20 design event, without causing the water surface to extend above the upstream end of the culvert or\n21 stormwater pipe that will discharge to the infiltration area. No specific infiltration data have been\n22 collected at the IDF project site. However, infiltration rates have been determined for use at the Waste\n23 Treatment Plant (Geotechnical Report Supplement No. 1, Shannon and Wilson, April 2001). These\n24 infiltration rates were used in sizing each of the infiltration areas.\n25 The culverts and stormwater pipes were designed to convey the peak 25-year flow with a maximum\n26 headwater to a diameter ratio of 1.25. Both inlet and outlet flow conditions were analyzed. The starting\n27 water surface for the outlet flow condition calculations were the maximum water surface elevation\n28 estimated for the associated infiltration area for the 24-hour, 25-year design event.\n29 5.11 Action Leakage Rate (ALR)\n30 5.11.1 LDS ALR\n31 The ALR is defined in WAC 173-303-665(8) and the Final Rule (EPA 1992a, 40 CFR Part 264.222) as\n32 the \"maximum design flow rate that the leak detection system.. .can remove without the fluid head on the\n33 bottom liner exceeding 1 foot\". This calculation was performed to determine the ALR for the IDF lining\n34 system. The IDF consists of two cells, each with an area of approximately 8.5 acres.\n35 In addition to determining the ALR, an estimate of actual leakage rate through the proposed primary\n36 bottom lining system is provided as a comparison to the calculated ALR. HELP modeling for the side\n37 slope indicates negligible head build-up on the side slopes (see Section 5.8), thus an estimation of the\n38 actual leakage rate was determined for the bottom primary lining system only.\n39 EPA provides a formula (based on Darcy's Law for calculating this flow capacity), assuming that it\n40 originates from a single hole in the primary liner (EPA, 1992b). Calculations presented in Appendix C.10\n41 provide details of the method of analysis and input data. The ALR calculations are dependent on the\n42 transmissivity value for the CDN. A value of 3 x 10-5 m2/sec was used in the ALR analysis (equivalent\n43 to the value required by WAC and EPA regulations for the LDS, Section 5.7.2). Calculations in\n44 Appendix C.6.b2 provide justification for the transmissivity used in the ALR analyses.\n45 The results of the analyses indicate the ALR for each IDF cell is 206 gallons per acre per day (gpad) or\n46 approximately 1,800 gallons per day per cell. This ALR includes a factor of safety of 2 in accordance\n47 with EPA guidelines (EPA, 1992b).\nAppendix 4A.1.67\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI It is also much lower than the capacity of the pump that removes liquid from the LDS. The estimated\n2 actual leakage rate for the composite primary lining system is 0.06 gpad (small defect) to 0.08 gpad\n3 (larger defect) for a composite liner with good intimate contact, and 0.3 gpad (small) to 0.4 gpad (large)\n4 for poor contact. Detailed calculations for both rates are presented in Appendix C. 10.\n5 The proposed primary composite lining system has a much lower estimated leakage rate than the ALR.\n6 This demonstrates the benefit of the GCL that is included in the primary bottom lining system, to provide\n7 a composite lining system and minimize actual leakage rate through the bottom primary lining system.\n8 5.12 Building Systems Analyses\n9 5.12.1 Geotechnical Design Parameters\n10 The key geotechnical parameters and analyses for structural design of the supporting facilities for the\n11 Hanford IDF included the following:\n12 * Bearing Capacity\n13 * Settlement\n14 * Modulus of Subgrade Reaction\n15 * Earth Pressures\n16 * UBC Seismic Soil Parameters\n17 The methodologies, input data, and results for each of these categories of analysis are presented in detail\n18 in Appendix C.I l.A.\n19 5.12.2 Structural\n20 5.12.2.1 Crest Pad Building Foundation Analysis, Pipe Bracing and Winch\n21 The crest pad building foundation was analyzed as a concrete slab on an elastic foundation. The\n22 foundation was modeled with springs to model the vertical sub-grade reaction. The value of the vertical\n23 sub-grade reaction was provided by the geotechnical engineer. The applied loads and load combinations\n24 were input into Visual Analysis (version 4.0), a finite element program. The finite element analyses\n25 results include elastic settlement, moments, and shears values of the concrete slab. The results were then\n26 used to design slab depth and reinforcing.\n27 Load reactions from the pre-engineered metal building were estimated using hand calculations and\n28 applied onto the concrete slab at the corners of the slab. It is a reasonable assumption that the frame loads\n29 from the pre-engineered metal building will only occur at the corner of the building, since the size of the\n30 building will not require any intermediate framing.\n31 Loads and load combinations were used as required by TFC-ENG-STD-06, REV A. Performance\n32 category, PC-I was used as specified and applied as applicable for both wind, seismic, and load\n33 combinations requirements.\n34 In summary, the analyses results showed that an 8-inch thick slab sufficed with #5 reinforcing at 12-inch\n35 centers. The analyses results also showed that a 1 foot-10 inch edge thickening around the perimeter of\n36 the building would be sufficient. More detailed accounting of the analyses is presented in\n37 Appendix C.11.bl.\n38 The pipe bracing and support for the small diameter PVC (polyvinyl chloride) piping included both\n39 gravity as well as lateral load resistance, due to a seismic event. The governing piping support is assumed\n40 a 6-foot-tall cantilever support, with the piping load and 50 pounds of lateral load applied to the top of the\n41 support. The 50 pound lateral load was used in lieu of the calculated seismic load because the calculated\n42 seismic load was only 19 pounds. Using a 50 pound lateral load gives the pipe support system greater\n43 rigidity. Detailed calculations of the pipe supports are included in Appendix C.11.b2.\n44 The winch support was analyzed as a vertical cantilever that supports the winch and resists a total lateral\n45 load of 400 pounds.\nAppendix 4A. 1.68\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 A 400 pound lateral load was used since the entire gravity load of the pump and the hoses adds up to this\n2 weight. Therefore, using 400 pounds in the horizontal direction is conservative. Detailed calculations of\n3 the winch support are given in Appendix C. 1.b3.\n4 5.12.2.2 Leachate Transfer Building Foundation Analysis\n5 As the leachate transfer building foundation is considered as a slab-on-grade, only hand calculations were\n6 performed. Foundation soil reactions were considered to be distributed linearly, then soil pressure\n7 distributions were applied to the concrete to calculated the moment and shear values for design of the\n8 concrete slab and reinforcing steel.\n9 Load reactions from the pre-engineered metal building were estimated using hand calculations and\n10 applied onto the concrete slab along the perimeter of the slab.\n11 Loads and load combinations were used as required by TFC-ENG-STD-06, REV A. Performance\n12 category, PC-1 was used as specified and applied as applicable for both wind, seismic, and load\n13 combinations requirements.\n14 In summary, the analyses results showed that the 2-foot-6 inch-thick slab with #6 bars at 12-inch centers\n15 will suffice and appears to be overdesigned. The 2-foot-6-inch thickness is not based on concrete strength\n16 requirements but more for frost depth cover, simplifying the ground forming, and reinforcing bending\n17 requirements. Detailed calculations of the analyses are presented in Appendix C.1 l.c.\n18 5.12.2.3 Leachate Tank Foundation Analysis\n19 The leachate tank foundation is considered to be a concrete ringwall, per AWWA D103-97. The tank\n20 gravity loads, including both water load and tank dead loads, were considered in the design of the\n21 ringwall.\n22 AWWA D103-97, Factory-Coated Bolted Steel Tanks for Water Storage is not listed in the TFC-ENG-\n23 STD-06, REV A. AWWA D100-96, Welded Steel Tanks for Water Storage, is listed; however, this\n24 standard does not apply, since the tank will be a bolted steel tank. Therefore, the tank will be designed\n25 per AWWA D103-97, Factory-Coated Bolted Steel Tanks for Water Storage.\n26 The analysis of the concrete ringwall and reinforcing is based on the hoop tension on the ringwall from\n27 the surcharge of the liquid weight on the soil within the ringwall. In summary, a 4-foot-6-inch-deep by\n28 1-foot-6-inch width ringwall with #7 at 12-inch-longitudinal reinforcing on each face of the ringwall will\n29 suffice. Detailed calculations of the analyses are presented in Appendix C.1 1.d.\n30 5.12.2.4 Truck Loading Station Foundation Analysis and Leachate Loading\n31 The Truck Loading Station foundation was analyzed as a concrete slab on an elastic foundation. The\n32 foundation was modeled with springs to model the vertical subgrade reaction. The value of the vertical\n33 subgrade reaction was provided by the geotechnical engineer. The applied loads and load combinations\n34 were input into Visual Analysis (version 4.0), a finite element program. The finite element analyses\n35 results include elastic settlement, moments, and shears values of the concrete slab. The results were then\n36 used to design slab depth and reinforcing.\n37 Loads and load combinations were used as required by TFC-ENG-STD-06, REV A. As required,\n38 AASHTO HB-16 loading was used with an HS 20-44 load wheel pattern. For maximum axle load,\n39 40,000 pounds was used instead of 32,000 pounds as required per HS 20-44. An impact factor was also\n40 applied as required by AASHTO HB-16.\n41 The wheel pattern loading was arranged in three positions on the slab to yield the maximum moments and\n42 shears. Supporting calculations and further discussions are presented in Appendix C.11.el.\n43 The leachate loading support was analyzed as a post with a horizontal boom attached near the top of the\n44 post. The design load included the dead weight of the post, boom, and piping full of water. Wind loads\n45 were analyzed per ASCE 7-98.\nAppendix 4A. 1.69\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI In addition, the lateral load was compared with a 300-pound point load hanging vertically at the end of\n2 the boom. The lateral wind load governed for overall overturning at the base of the post; however, the\n3 300-pound point load governed for the boom attachment to the post.\n4 In summary, a 10-inch by 10-inch tube for the post, with a 6-inch by 6-inch tube as the horizontal boom\n5 welded to the post will suffice. The geotechnical engineer has verified that a 5-foot-6-inch-deep and\n6 3-foot-diameter concrete encasement around the post will be sufficient for strength and stability.\n7 Supporting calculations and further discussions are presented Appendix C. 11.e2.\n8 5.12.3 Mechanical/Heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC)\n9 5.12.3.1 Crest Pad and Leachate Transfer Building\n10 Heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) capacities were calculated for the crest pad and\n11 leachate transfer buildings. The temperature within the buildings must be controlled within a range to\n12 prevent freezing fluids in piping or overheating electronic devices. The HVAC components for the\n13 buildings were selected based on the criteria and calculations provided in Appendix C. 11 .f and C. 11 .g.\n14 5.12.4 Electrical/I&C\n15 This section introduces and summarizes the results of detailed electrical engineering calculations included\n16 in Appendix C. 11.h.\n17 * IDF leachate collection and handling crest pad facilities (two each)\n18 * IDF leachate storage tank and leachate transfer facilities (two each)\n19 * IDF truck loading facilities (two each)\n20 5.12.4.1 Building Power Supply\n21 Open Items\n22 The Phase I Critical Systems 80% IDF design documents do not identify the following open items:\n23 * Exact location of primary 13.8 kV, 3-phase tie-in\n24 * Exact value of available primary short circuit current at primary tie-in location\n25 * Exact length of primary extension\n26 * Exact location, size, and impedance of utility step-down 13.8 kV -480/277V three, phase, 4-wire\n27 pad mounted transformer(s)\n28 These items are scheduled to be addressed during the next IDF Phase I Non-Critical design.\n29 Assumptions\n30 The following assumptions were made in order to complete the 80% engineering analysis.\n31 * Assume electrical service gear inside each Cell I and Cell 2 crest pad building to be powered by\n32 separate pad mounted utility transformers.\n33 * Assume pad mounted utility transformers to be rated 75 kVA and installed within 100 feet of\n34 respective Cell I and Cell 2 crest pad buildings.\n35 * Assume each pad mounted utility transformer to be radial fed from a common 13.8 kV primary\n36 feeder.\n37 * Assume each Cell 1 and Cell 2 leachate transfer building to be powered from electrical service\n38 gear, located inside respective crest pad buildings.\n39 * Assume available short circuit at primary side of pad mounted utility transformer(s) to be 100\n40 MVA with an (X/R) ratio equal to 8.\n41 * Assume impedance of 75 kVA pad mounted utility transformer to be 3.2%Z, 2.42%IR, and\n42 2.10%IX.\n43 * Assume power factor and efficiency for all pump motors to be 85 percent and 82 percent,\n44 respectively.\nAppendix 4A.1.70\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI * Assume 25 foot candles of lighting levels to be required for interior of each building.\n2 * Assumptions will be reviewed and addressed during the next IDF Phase I Non-Critical design.\n3 Method ofAnalysis\n4 * Branch circuit, feeder and service calculations in accordance with NEC Code (2002)\n5 * Short circuit analysis (per unit) in accordance with IEEE-Red Book, Standard 141 (1993)\n6 * Grounding electrode analysis in accordance with IEEE-Green Book, Standard 142 (1991)\n7 * Computer analysis by SKM PTW 32 (Power Tools for Windows, 2003)\n8 * Building interior lighting zonal cavity method in accordance with Integrated Engineering\n9 Software, Inc. (IES) Lighting Handbook (2000)\n10 Analysis Performed Includes\n11 * Calculate and size service, feeder, and branch circuits, based upon demand and design loads.\n12 * Calculate and size equipment, equipment bus amperage, protective devices, and motor overloads,\n13 based upon demand and design loads.\n14 * Calculate and size power feeders and branch circuit wiring, based upon demand and design loads.\n15 * Calculate short circuit ratings for equipment.\n16 * Calculate feeder and branch circuit voltage drop, and power factor.\n17 * Calculate building lighting system requirements.\n18 Voltage Drop\n19 Load flow steady state voltage drop calculations for all feeders were based upon an equipment 85 percent\n20 power factor. Wire size were calculated and selected so that circuits do not exceed total voltage drop\n21 from the source bus to the point of utilization, including feeders and branch circuits:\nService and sub feeders 2 percent Heat trace from panels 1 percent\nLighting from panels 1 percent Receptacles from panels 1 percent\nMotors from motor control center (MCC) 1 percent Instrumentation from panels I percent\n22 Feeder and Equipment Sizing\n23 Service, feeder, branch circuit conductor ampacity, and protection devices ratings are based upon\n24 applicable sections of the NEC (2002) including:\n25 * Lighting Loads per Article 220: Lighting\n26 * Receptacle Loads per Article 220.13: Non-dwelling Units\n27 * Continuous Loads per Article 230: Service\n28 * Motor Loads per Article 220:14 and 430: Motors\n29 * Air Condition Load per Article 440.6: Refrigerant Motor Compressor\n30 * Heat Loads per Article 200.15: Fixed Electric Space Heating\n31 * Non-Coincident Loads per Article 220.21: Non-coincidental Loads\n32 * Heat Trace per Article 427: Fixed Electric Heating Equipment for Pipelines and Vessels\n33 Load Factors\n34 The following table summarizes load factors applied for various equipment in accordance with\n35 appropriate sections of the NEC (2002), while determining demand and design load analysis:\n36\n37\n38\n39\n40\nAppendix 4A.1.71\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Table 5-4. Building Power Supply Load Factors\nItem Panel and Service Load Analysis Comment\nHeater Loads* 100 percent full load amperage (FLA) Branch circuit sized to\n125 percent of FLA\nMotor Loads Sum of motor load (FLA) + 25 percent of largest motor Branch circuit sized to\n(FLA) 125 percent of FLA\nReceptacles 180 VA /outlet Non-Continuous Load\nLighting 2 watts/sq.-ft or total connected (FLA), whichever is Continuous Load\nlarger\nCooling Loads* 100 percent FLA Branch circuit sized to\n125 percent of FLA\nDemand Factors Demand Factor Percent\nFirst 10 kVA Non-Dwelling Receptacles 100 percent\nRemainder over 1OkVA Non-Dwelling Receptacles 50 percent\nNon-continuous Load 100 percent\nContinuous Loads 125 percent\n* Note: The largest of the non-coincidental heat and cooling loads are used for service sizing.\n2\n3\nAppendix 4A.I.72\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Table 5-5. Input Data Typical for Cell I and Cell 2\nDescription Ratings Comments\nPump 219(Y)-LH-P-202 1/2 HP @ 480V, 3-phase Coincidental load\nPump 219(Y)-LH-P-203 7.5 HP @ 480V, 3-phase Coincidental load\nPump 219(Y)-LH-P-204 1/2 HP @ 480V, 3-phase Coincidental load\nPump 219(Y)-LH-P-205 1/3 HP @ 480V, 3-phase Coincidental load\nPump 219(Y)-LH-P-207 3 HP @ 480V, 3-phase Coincidental load\nPump 219(Y)1-LH-P-302 3 HP @ 480V, 3-phase Coincidental load\nHeater 219(Y)-LH-UH-001 3.3 kW @ 480V, 3-phase Non-coincidental and continuous load*\nHeater 219(Y)1-LH-UH-002 3.3 kW @ 480V, 3-phase Non-coincidental and continuous load*\nAir Condition 219(Y)-LH-AC-001 2.04 kVA @ 208V, 1-phase Non-coincidental load\nAir Condition 219(Y)1-LH-AC-002 .96 kVA @ 208V, 1-phase Non-coincidental load\nControl Panel 219(Y)-LH-CP-001 1.5 kVA @ 120V, L-N Continuous load\nBldg. 219(Y) Lighting 71 kVA @ 120V, L-N Continuous load\nBldg. 219(Y)1 Lighting 29 kVA @ 120V, L-N Continuous load\nHeat Trace 219(Y)201-LH-HT-001 77 M @ 120V, L-N Continuous load\nHeat Trace 219(Y)201-LH-HT-002 77 kW @ 120V, L-N Continuous load\nHeat Trace 219(Y)1-LH-HT-003 77 M @ 120V, L-N Continuous load\nBldg. 219(Y) Receptacles 720 kVA @ 120V, L-N I80VAI outlet\nBldg. 219(Y)1 Receptacles 360 kVA @ 120V, L-N 8VA outlet\nNote: (Y) = A,E\nCell 1 (A), Cell 2 (E)\nHeater Load is greater than AC load.\n2\nAppendix 4A. 1.73\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTable 5-6. Building Power Supply Results/Conclusions\nDescription Ratings\nBldg. 219(X) connected load @ 219(X)-LH-MCC-001 23 kVA connected -26 kVA\ndesign for each crest pad building.\nBldg. 219(X) main service breaker size @ 219(X)-LH-MCC-001 100 amps\nBldg. 219(X) main service feeder to 219(x)-LH-MCC-001 3#1 TW, 1#1 TW (N)\nBldg. 219(X) service transformer 75 kVA, 480V, 3-phase, 4-wire\nBldg. 219(X)1 transfer bldg. feeder breaker size 50 amps\nBldg. 219(X)1 transfer bldg. feeder size 3#4 TW, 1#8 G\n219(x)-LH-MCC-001 short circuit available 2,484 amps symmetrical\n219(x)1-LH-SW-002 short circuit available 1,632 amps symmetrical\n219(x)-LH-LP-001 short circuit available 1,177 amps symmetrical\n219(x)1-LH-LP-002 short circuit available 1,068 amps symmetrical\n219(X) -LH-LP-00 1 lighting panel rating 60 amps\n219(X)1-LH-LP-002 lighting panel rating 60 amps\n219(X)-LH-T-001 lighting panel transformer rating 15 kVA\n219(X)1-LH-T-002 lighting panel transformer rating 15 kVA\n219(X)-LH-P-203 LCRS high flow pump motor feeder size 3#12 TW, 1#12 G\n219(X)-LH-P-202 LCRS low flow pump motor feeder size 3#12 TW, 1#12 G\n219(X)-LH-P-204 LDS pump motor feeder size 3#12 TW, 1#12 G\n219(X)-LH-P-205 sump pump motor feeder size 3#12 TW, 1#12 G\n219(X)1-LH-P-302 transfer pump motor feeder size 3#12 TW, 1#12 G\n219(X)-LH-P-207 combined sump pump motor feeder size 3#12 TW, 1#12 G\n219(X)-LH-UH-001 unit heater feeder size 3#12 TW, 1#12 G\n219(X)1-LH-UH-002 unit heater feeder size 3#12 TW, 1#12 G\n219(X)-LH-AC-001 air condition feeder size 3#10 TW, 1#10 G\n219(X)1-LH-AC-002 air condition feeder size 3#12 TW, 1#12 G\n219(X)-LH-MD-001 motor damper feeder size 2#12 TW, 1#12 G\n219(X)1-LH-MD-002 motor damper feeder size 2#12 TW, 1#12 G\n219(Y)201-LH-HT-001 leachate storage tank heat trace feeder size 2#10 TW, 1#10 G\n219(Y)201-LH-HT-002 leachate storage tank heat trace feeder size 2#10 TW, 1#10 G\n219(Y)1-LH-HT-003 truck loading station heat trace feeder size 2#10 TW, 1#10 G\n219(X)-LH-CP-001 main control panel feeder size 2#10 TW, 1#10 G\nNote: (X) = A,E\nAppendix 4A. 1.74\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Recommendations\n2 Building Power Supply\n3 * Provide separate power distribution equipment (pad mount utility transformer, secondary service,\n4 and power distribution gear) for Cell 1 and Cell 2 in order to maximize redundancy.\n5 * Install service rated motor control center inside each crest pad building for providing service\n6 entrance, branch, and sub-feeder distribution capability, and complete motor control for various\n7 process control systems.\n8 * Power lighting, receptacle, and facility loads from 3-phase, 4-wire lighting panel installed in each\n9 building.\n10 * Power instrumentation from surge protected distribution center mounted inside facility control\n11 panel.\n12 * Ground Electrode System.\n13 * Provide and install ground electrode system for service and each separately derived system that\n14 incorporates both ground ring, ground rod, and concrete encased building rebar.\n15 * Provide ground bus inside Process Instrumentation and Control Systems (PICS) control panels\n16 and bond to common ground electrode system.\n17 * Bond non-current carrying metallic structure to ground electrode system that has the potential of\n18 becoming energized by attached electrical devices such as metallic conduit systems, enclosures,\n19 storage tank structures, building metal framing and siding, and above grade metallic process\n20 equipment.\n21 5.12.4.2 Crest Pad Building Lighting\n22 Building lighting systems were based upon I.E.S Zonal Cavity method in order to maintain an average\n23 25-foot-candle level for process interior of each building.\n24 Note: Interior lighting levels are based upon IES Lighting Handbook Indoor Industrial Areas\n25 Recommended Illuminance Levels-for interior activities inside work spaces where visual tasks of medium\n26 to large contrast are to be performed on occasional basis.\n27 Note: Exterior entrance lighting levels are based upon IES Lighting Handbook Outdoor Site/Area\n28 Recommended Illuminance Levels for building exterior entrances frequently visited locations.\n29 Open Items\n30 None\n31 Assumptions\n32 The following assumptions were made when analyzing building lighting.\n33 Reflectance for unfinished rooms:\nCeilings 50 percent reflectance\nWalls 50 percent reflectance\nFloors 20 percent reflectance\n34 Maintenance factor (light loss factor), interior lighting:\nIncandescent lighting .80\nFluorescent lighting .61\nHPS lighting .70\n35 Maintenance factor (light loss factor), exterior lighting:\nHPS lighting .70\nAppendix 4A. 1.75\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Inputs\n2 Crest pad buildings are unfinished industrial buildings with interior dimensions of:\nRoom name: Cell I crest pad building Ceiling height: 11 feet\nFixture type: fluorescent two-lamp Mount height: 9 feet\nRoom size: width 16 feet and length 21 feet Area: 336 square feet\n3 Recommendations\n4 * Provide fluorescent low temperature starting wrap-around industrial fixtures for interior lighting\n5 of buildings\n6 * Use two lamps in six fixtures for 25-foot candles minimum\n7 * Install low pressure sodium fixture at front entrance on north exterior wall\n8 5.12.4.3 Leachate Transfer Building Lighting\n9 Building lighting system was based upon I.E.S Zonal Cavity method in order to maintain an average\n10 25-foot-candle level for process interior of each building.\n11 Note: Interior lighting levels are based upon IES Lighting Handbook Indoor Industrial Areas\n12 Recommended Illuminance Levels for interior activities inside work spaces where visual tasks of medium\n13 to large contrast are to be performed on occasional basis.\n14 Note: Exterior entrance lighting levels are based upon IES Lighting Handbook Outdoor Site/Area\n15 Recommended Illuminance Levels for building exterior entrances frequently visited locations.\n16 Open Items\n17 None\n18 Assumptions\n19 The following assumptions were made when analyzing building lighting.\n20 Reflectance for unfinished rooms:\nCeilings 50 percent reflectance\nWalls 50 percent reflectance\nFloors 20 percent reflectance\n21 Maintenance factor (light loss factor), interior lighting:\nIncandescent lighting .80\nFluorescent lighting .61\nHPS lighting .70\n22 Maintenance factor (light loss factor), exterior lighting\nHPS lighting .70\n23 Inputs\n24 Crest pad buildings are unfinished industrial buildings with interior dimensions of:\nRoom name: leachate transfer building Ceiling height: eight feet\nFixture type: fluorescent two-lamp Mount height: eight feet\nRoom size: width 10 feet and length 10 feet Area: 100 square feet\n25 Recommendations\n26 * Provide fluorescent low-temperature starting wrap-around industrial fixtures for interior lighting\n27 of buildings\n28 * Use two lamps in two fixtures for 25-foot candles minimum\nAppendix 4A.1.76\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * Install low pressure sodium fixture at front entrance on north exterior wall and low pressure\n2 sodium on south exterior wall\n3 5.12.4.4 Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS) Sizing\n4 Uninterruptible power is provided and sized to provide 25 minutes minimum of continuous backup power\n5 to the PICS programmable logic controller (PLC), operator interface unit (OIU), and local area network\n6 communication equipment.\n7 In the event of a power failure, UPS will maintain communication with remote monitoring sites (future)\n8 and insure safe shutdown of power sensitive PICS equipment.\n9 Open Items\n10 None\n11 Assumptions\n12 None\n13 Table 5-7. Input Data Typical for Cell 1 and Cell 2 Control Panel Loads\nDescription Ratings Comments\nPLC Power Supply 180 VA Continuous load\nOIU Power Supply 60 VA Continuous load\nEthernet Switch Power Supply 44 VA Continuous load\nTotal *1.25 355 VA\n14 Recommendations\n15 Table 5-8. Fortress Runtimes for Typical Applications in Minutes\nLoad (VA) 50 100 200 300 400 500 600 750 900 1050 1250 1425 1800 2250\n0520-1050U 200 125 63 42 31 24 19 14 11 9.5 ----\n0520-0750U 132 75 38 26 19 14 11 8.5 ------\n16 Provide 1050 VA 120 Volt- 120 Volt UPS to achieve the 25 minutes minimum of continuous backup,\n17 power in the event of a power failure. Additional capacity will compensate for battery cycling\n18 deprivation.\n19 5.13 Civil Grading\n20 5.13.1 Waste Volume, Cut/Fill and Stockpile Requirement Calculations\n21 The IDF is designed to provide the waste volume requirements identified by CH2M HILL. Those\n22 requirements consist of an ultimate landfill capacity for 1,177,110 cubic yards of waste and a Phase 1\n23 capacity of 213,515 cubic yards of waste.\n24 The IDF is also designed to balance the cut and fill volumes of the project. The ultimate landfill layout\n25 on the project site provides this balance. The volume balance includes excavated material, which will be\n26 used for the construction of the closure cap. Since the closure cap will be selected and designed in the\n27 future, assumptions for the cap layout and construction were made.\n28 With a phased construction approach planned for IDF and the fact that'the material balance includes\n29 backfill to construct a closure cap for the ultimate landfill, a substantial volume of material will be stored\n30 in stockpiles at the completion of construction of Phase I landfill. The Phase I landfill design volumes for\n31 subgrade cut, admix liner, drain gravel, and operations layer material were calculated using a 3-D\n32 AutoCAD model of the landfill. These volumes were used to identify the stockpile requirements to store\n33 material once Phase I construction is complete.\nAppendix 4A. 1.77\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Potential stockpile locations are identified on the project site plan. Calculations of these volumes are\n2 included in Appendix C.12.a. Calculations in Appendix C.12.a also present confirmation of the available\n3 waste volume and cut/fill balance.\n4 5.13.2 Phase I Access Road and Ramp Cross Section Design\n5 Two cross sections using granular material for base and top course were designed for the Phase I landfill\n6 access roads and the access ramp into the landfill. The design reflects the estimated wheel loads and\n7 vehicles to use the facility daily. Calculations presenting the development of these cross sections are\n8 included in Appendix C.12.b.\n9 6.0 FACILITY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION\n10 6.1 Facility Layout\n11 6.1.1 Location\n12 The IDF will be located approximately 1,400 feet east of Baltimore Avenue and directly north of 1st\n13 Street in the 200 East Area of the Hanford Site. Phase I of the IDF landfill will measure approximately\n14 800 feet by 1,500 feet, with its north-south axis being the shorter dimension. Leachate handling facilities\n15 will be located immediately north of the Phase I cells. The excavated depth to subgrade (not including\n16 sump depressions) will range from approximately 44 to 51 feet. Excavation will be deepest at the\n17 landfill's north end, near the sumps and along the centerline of each cell. It will be shallowest at the\n18 southwest and southeast corners of Cells 1 and 2, respectively. Stockpile locations for excavated\n19 materials will be situated east and southeast of the Phase I landfill excavation. At the completion of\n20 Phase I construction, exposed surfaces of the stockpiles and disturbed areas will be covered with a layer\n21 of topsoil, then seeded and mulched. A borrow area of soil to supplement admix preparation is located\n22 south of the Phase I excavation location.\n23 6.1.2 Access Roads and Ramps\n24 For access to Phase I of the IDF, waste hauler and operations vehicles will follow an access road and\n25 travel north from 1st Street. All roads and ramps at the Phase I IDF site will be constructed with crushed\n26 surfacing material for the base and top courses. The access road from 1st Street will be aligned with the\n27 landfill's west berm access road. The road will also follow the alignment of the west access berm road\n28 for the future IDF cells.\n29 The access road will lead north, approximately 1,000 feet from 1st Street to where it widens into an\n30 intersection. At this location, a turn to the east will lead down a 5 percent grade, 800-foot-long access\n31 ramp into the Phase I landfill. The access ramp slope was selected to allow use by both waste haul trucks\n32 and the melter transporter. The grade of the access road from 1st Street was also limited to a maximum of\n33 five percent for this same reason. The access ramp into the landfill and the access road from 1st Street to\n34 the intersection area will be both 30 feet wide.\n35 At that base of the ramp into the landfill, there will be adequate room for waste haul vehicles to turn and\n36 move the waste into the cells. The liner system will be installed to extend approximately 50 feet south\n37 beyond the estimated toe of slope of Phase I waste placement. This extension will allow waste haul\n38 vehicles to be staged or unloaded over a lined area.\n39 At the access road intersection, continuing north will lead up a short ramp and onto the berm access road.\n40 The berm access road will be 20 feet wide on the east and west sides of the landfill. The road will widen\n41 to 30 feet at the northwest and northeast comers of the landfill and along the landfill's north side.\n42 The wider road in these areas will allow operations vehicles to traverse around road comers and the crest\n43 pad buildings.\n44 The access road will continue from the northwest corner of the berm access road to the Cell 1 and Cell 2\n45 leachate storage tank facilities. A cul-de-sac area will be provided just east of the Cell 2 leachate\n46 facilities to provide a turnaround area for operations vehicles and leachate tanker trucks.\nAppendix 4A. 1.78\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 A road will also be provided to allow operation vehicles to travel south between the leachate facilities and\n2 onto the berm access road at the centerline of IDF landfill.\n3 Future projects are being planned to upgrade the 1st Street pavement and construct an operation building\n4 north of the IDF landfill. It is anticipated that these facilities will connect to access roads designed for the\n5 Phase I landfill.\n6 Related to permanent access roads and their use, the construction contractor will be required by the\n7 project general requirements to submit a plan, which details their use during construction. This plan will\n8 address locations and limits of stripping/grubbing, construction haul roads, stockpile/borrow areas and\n9 other construction staging areas.\n10 6.1.3 Survey Grids\n11 Survey grids for this project use the Washington State Plane coordinate system (South Zone-feet, NAD83\n12 Lambert Projection). Contours are based on 200 Area topographic mapping database, provided by\n13 Hanford HGIS Department and dated 1991. A 1-foot contour interval was used on the design drawings.\n14 As part of the Phase I landfill design, construction control points were developed for landfill and sump\n15 subgrades as well as for the anchor trenches, stormwater facilities, and the finished grades for all roads\n16 and ramps. North and east coordinates and elevations for these points are included in a survey control\n17 table on Drawing H-2-830829, Sheet 2 of 2. The control points and lines between them will provide a\n18 location grid that will allow construction of the subgrade, liner system, operations layer, and the finished\n19 grades for the IDF.\n20 6.2 Landfill Geometry\n21 6.2.1 Waste Volumes and Types\n22 6.2.1.1 Volume\n23 Two key design criteria were provided by CH2M HILL concerning waste volumes:\n24 * Phase I of the IDF should be designed to receive a waste volume of 213,515 cubic yards, which is\n25 equal to163,250 cubic meters. CH2M HILL identified the waste volume for placement in all\n26 phases of IDF (ultimate landfill size) as 1,177,110 cubic yards, or 900,000 cubic meters.\n27 * Both the Phase I landfill and the ultimate landfill volumes should be sized for an air space, which\n28 includes 1.5 cubic yards of clean fill for every cubic yard of waste.\n29 * Using these criteria, Phase I was designed to provide air space for placement of 533,620 cubic\n30 yards of waste and clean fill.\n31 6.2.1.2 Waste Types\n32 (Note: The disposal of MLLW other than ILAW, DBVS waste, and IDF generated waste is not permitted\n33 at this time by this permit.)\n34 The IDF will receive waste types including ILAW, DBVS Waste, and LLW. These wastes include both\n35 contact and remote-handled wastes. As identified in the project kickoff meetings by CH2M HILL, the\n36 waste volumes (in cubic yards) are estimated to include the following:\n37\nAppendix 4A.1.79\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nWaste Type Phase I All Phases\nILAW 50,025 753,350\nMILLW 57.550 146,485\nLLW 105,940 277,275\nTotal 213,515 1,177,110\n1 These volumes are based on waste forecast information provided by Fluor Hanford, Inc. (FH). The waste\n2 volume forecasts are updated by Hanford Site contractors on a regular basis. The volumes above\n3 represent an average between the FH 2002 Forecast and the FH 1999 (with EIS) Forecast. Short\n4 descriptions of the waste types are given below:\n5 Immobilized Low-Activity Waste (ILAW)-The LAW packages are stainless steel cylinders that have\n6 been filled with vitrified low-activity waste (physically similar to glass), sealed, and cooled. The source\n7 of these waste cylinders is the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant. The packages are 7.5 feet in\n8 height and 4 feet in diameter, and could weigh up to 22,050 pounds each.\n9 Contact-Handled Mixed Low-Level Waste (CH MLLW)-This waste has a dose rate equal to or less\n10 than 200 mrem/h and contains radioactivity not classified as high-level waste, spent nuclear fuel or\n11 transuranic (TRU) waste (TRU is defined as concentrations of transuranic radionuclides greater than or\n12 equal to 100nCi/g of the waste matrix). The waste is also defined as dangerous (hazardous) waste in\n13 WAC 173-303.\n14 Remote-Handled MLLW -This waste has a dose rate greater than 200 mrem/h and contains\n15 radioactivity not classified as high-level waste, spent nuclear fuel, or TRU waste. The waste is also\n16 defined as dangerous (hazardous) waste in WAC 173-303.\n17 Low-Level Waste Category I (LLW I)-This waste contains radioactivity not classified as high-level\n18 waste, spent nuclear fuel, or TRU waste. The waste also meets the radionuclide limits for category I\n19 waste, defined in the Hanford Site Solid Waste Acceptance Criteria (RH, 1998). This waste may be\n20 comprised of either contact- or remote-handled waste considered low-activity waste with very low\n21 concentrations of long-lived radionuclides. This waste is not a dangerous (hazardous) waste as defined in\n22 WAC 173-303.\n23 Low-Level Waste Category III (LLW III)-This waste contains radioactivity not classified as high-level\n24 waste, spent nuclear fuel, or TRU waste. The waste also exceeds the radionuclide limits for category I\n25 waste and meets the category III limits, defined in the Hanford Site Solid Waste Acceptance Criteria (FH,\n26 1998). This waste may be comprised of either contact- or remote-handled waste considered moderate- to\n27 high-activity waste with low to moderate concentrations of long-lived radionuclides, in stabilized form\n28 that minimizes subsidence for a period of 1,000 years. This waste is not a dangerous (hazardous) waste as\n29 defined in WAC 173-303.\n30 Remote-Handled LLW -This waste has a dose rate greater than 200 mrem/h and contains radioactivity\n31 not classified as high-level waste, spent nuclear fuel, or TRU waste. This waste is not a dangerous\n32 (hazardous) waste as defined in WAC 173-303.\n33 6.2.2 Landfill Phases and Dimensions\n34 The IDF will be a single, expandable RCRA Subtitle C disposal facility that provides ultimate capacity\n35 for 1,177,110 cubic yards (900,000 cubic meters) of waste. The facility is currently anticipated to be\n36 constructed in four phases. Phase I will have two cells. Only Phase I is being permitted at this time.\n37 Each cell has a floor width of approximately 543 feet and a lined floor length of 360 feet. The total floor\n38 width of the IDF will be 1,085 feet. Side slopes of the landfill will be 3:1 (horizontal: vertical). At the\n39 south end of the Phase I cells, there will be a stormwater berm/ditch system with an infiltration area. The\n40 south side of IDF will be unlined for Phase I.\nAppendix 4A. 1.80\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 IDF will be expanded by relocation of the landfill's unlined south slope from earlier phases and\n2 installation of liner system and operations layer. When expanded to its final configuration, the floor of\n3 IDF will be 1,385 feet long, measured along its north-south axis.\n4 6.2.2.1 Depth and Length\n5 The landfill depth for all phases of the IDF is set to accommodate four layers of ILAW waste packages,\n6 placed on end, and each layer will be covered with 3.3 feet of clean soil. In some cases, the waste\n7 packages received for placement in the mixed and low-level waste side of IDF will have heights that vary\n8 from the ILAW package dimensions. In these cases, waste heights will vary from the four layers of\n9 ILAW waste described. The total depth, measured from the top of the operations layer to the top of the\n10 cover layer over the fourth waste layer, will be 43.4 feet. This is sized for the 7.5-foot tall [LAW package\n11 dimension. However, other waste package types can be accommodated. The waste/clean fill depth\n12 (43.2 feet) will be uniform over the entire landfill floor, due to the operations layer and the top of the\n13 landfill both sloping up 1 percent from north to south. The operations layer will be flat in the east-west\n14 direction.\n15 6.2.3 Materials Balance\n16 The IDF was designed to achieve near soil balance. This will minimize excess soil stockpile at the end of\n17 the life of the IDF facility and minimize the cost of hauling offsite borrow material for construction. It is\n18 important to note that the soil balance was calculated for completing IDF through all its phases and the\n19 balance included soil required for construction of the final closure cap. The closure cap design was not\n20 part of the critical systems design, completed for this project.\n21 Having a soil balance at the completion of all phases means that at the end of Phase I, a substantial\n22 amount (approximately 991,000 cubic yards) of material will be stockpiled onsite. The project design\n23 identified potential stockpile sites that were adequate in size for the material to be stockpiled. A portion\n24 of the stockpiled material will be used as clean fill during the waste placement in the Phase I cells.\n25 However, the stockpile will be replenished during the construction of cells for each subsequent IDF\n26 phase.\n27 A description of the resulting soil cut and fill volumes can be found in Appendix C.12.a of this Design\n28 Report.\n29 6.2.4 Erosion Control Measures\n30 Permanent erosion control measures (for both wind and water caused erosion) will be provided for areas\n31 disturbed by Phase I construction.\n32 Areas that are disturbed by the construction that are outside of the Phase I excavation will be stabilized\n33 with a 6-inch-thick layer of topsoil that will be seeded with grass. The south stormwater berm/ditch, the\n34 east and west infiltration areas, and the soil stockpiles will also be stabilized with topsoil and grass.\n35 Geotextile and quarry spalls will be placed around each end of the culverts and the stormwater pipe to\n36 provide erosion protection.\n37 Stormwater runoff will be conveyed along the south side of the access ramp and the south side of the flat\n38 area at the bottom of the access ramp, and will be discharged to the southwest comer of the excavation\n39 infiltration area. Road surfacing will reduce the erosion potential on the ramp and flat area. To prevent\n40 erosion of the south side slope adjacent to the ramp and flat area, a strip of erosion control matting will be\n41 installed on the south side slope, immediately adjacent to the ramp and flat area. Geotextile and quarry\n42 spalls will be placed in the southwest corner of the excavation pond in order to minimize the potential of\n43 erosion due to the stormwater that will be discharged from the south edge of the flat area to the top of the\n44 infiltration area.\n45 Erosion control matting will also be placed on the shine berm to minimize the potential for wind erosion.\n46 The erosion control matting will be a plastic matting with an estimated service life at least equal to the\n47 10-year period that the Phase I cells are expected to operate.\nAppendix 4A.I.81\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 To reduce wind erosion, all of the side slopes of the Phase I excavation will be stabilized with a spray-on\n2 application of a soil stabilization material. Additional applications of the soil stabilization material may\n3 have to be done annually on the areas that remain exposed.\n4 The contractor will also be required to prepare and implement a dust control plan for the construction.\n5 6.3 Lining System Materials\n6 6.3.1 Liner Selection Basis\n7 WAC 173-303-665(2)(a)(i) requires submittal of an engineering report with the permit application under\n8 WAC 173-303-806(4) stating the basis for selecting the liner(s). The report must be certified by a\n9 licensed professional engineer. The intent of Section 6.3 of the Design Report is to satisfy this\n10 requirement of the WAC 173-303, Dangerous Waste Regulations.\n11 Specific requirements to address as the basis for liner selection include:\n12 * The liner must be constructed of materials that have appropriate chemical properties and\n13 sufficient strength and thickness to prevent failure due to pressure gradients (including static head\n14 and external hydrogeologic forces), physical contact with the waste or leachate to which they are\n15 exposed, climatic conditions, the stress of installation, and the stress of daily operation.\n16 * The liner must be placed on a foundation or base that is capable of providing support to the liner\n17 and is able to resist pressure gradients above and below the liner to prevent failure of the liner due\n18 to settlement, compression, or uplift.\n19 * The liner must be installed to cover all surrounding earth likely to be in contact with waste or\n20 leachate.\n21 * The lining system must include a LCRS immediately above the liner that is designed, constructed,\n22 maintained, and operated to collect and remove leachate from the landfill. Design and operating\n23 conditions will ensure that the leachate depth over the liner does not exceed 1 foot. The LCRS\n24 shall be:\n25 * Constructed of materials that are chemically resistant to the waste managed in the landfill and the\n26 leachate expected to be generated, and of sufficient strength and thickness to prevent failure\n27 under the pressures exerted by overlying wastes, waste cover materials, and any equipment used\n28 at the landfill.\n29 * Designed and operated to function without clogging through the scheduled closure of the landfill.\n30 0 Engineering analyses were presented in Section 5 that address the above requirements for basis of\n31 lining selection. Of particular note is Section 5.6 that addresses lining system/leachate\n32 compatibility for all components of the lining system. Compatibility of the lining system\n33 components with the chemical and radiological constituents of the expected leachate is a critical\n34 aspect of the liner selection basis.\n35 * Based on results of the engineering analyses presented in Section 5, the following liner sections\n36 are proposed for the IDF bottom (floor) and side slope lining systems. Section 6.3.2 provides a\n37 detailed discussion of the liner materials for the barrier components of the lining system, and\n38 Section 6.3.3 provides a detailed discussion of the liner materials for the drainage and protection\n39 components of the lining system.\n40 Drawing H-2-830838 (Detail 1) shows the bottom liner section, consisting of the following components,\n41 from top to bottom:\n42 * A 3-foot-thick operations layer\n43 * A separation geotextile (polypropylene)\n44 * A 1-foot-thick leachate collection drain gravel layer\n45 * A minimum 12 oz/square yard cushion geotextile (polypropylene)\n46 * A 60-mil textured primary HDPE geomembrane\nAppendix 4A. 1.82\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * An internally-reinforced GCL\n2 * A CDN drainage layer for the LDS\n3 * A 60-mil textured secondary HDPE geomembrane\n4 * A 3-foot-thick low-permeability compacted admix (soil-bentonite) liner\n5 Drawing H-2-830838 (Detail 2) shows the side slope liner section, consisting of the following\n6 components, from top to bottom:\n7 * A 3-foot-thick operations layer\n8 * A CDN drainage layer for the LCRS\n9 * A 60-mil textured primary HDPE geomembrane\n10 * A CDN drainage layer for the LDS\n11 * A 60-mil textured secondary HDPE geomembrane\n12 * A 3-ft-thick low-permeability admix liner\n13 6.3.2 Liner Materials -Barrier Components\n14 6.3.2.1 Geomembranes\n15 WAC 173-303-665(2)(h)(i) requires that the IDF lining system have both a primary and secondary\n16 geomembrane. The geomembrane for the IDF will serve as leachate barrier and as a flow surface routing\n17 leachate to the LCRS sump (for the primary geomembrane) or LDS sump (for the secondary\n18 geomembrane).\n19 HDPE has been selected as the geomembrane liner material because it is generally acknowledged to have\n20 the highest chemical resistance of commercially-available liner materials, has been widely used at similar\n21 facilities, and has a high level of acceptance by regulatory agencies. Details of HDPE geomembrane\n22 compatibility with expected leachate is discussed in Section 5.6.\n23 A nominal thickness of 60-mil has been selected for the HDPE geomembrane. A nominal thickness of\n24 60-mil results in a minimal allowable thickness of 54-mil, as indicated in the technical specifications.\n25 Thus, 60-mil nominal thickness is the minimum required to achieve the 50-mil minimum thickness\n26 specified by Ecology guidance. Textured (roughened) geomembrane will be used to maximize shear\n27 strength along adjacent interfaces and to reduce the potential for sliding of the liner system. Analyses of\n28 the various stresses that the geomembrane is designed to withstand under construction and operational\n29 loads are presented in Section 5.5. Required material properties as a result of these analyses are included\n30 in the technical specifications.\n31 Details of required HDPE geomembrane properties are provided in the technical specifications (see\n32 Section 02661).\n33 6.3.2.2 GCL\n34 A GCL will only be included in the primary bottom lining system. For the bottom lining system, both the\n35 primary and secondary liners will be a composite (geomembrane over admix liner or GCL) system. The\n36 addition of a GCL in the primary lining system will provide an extra measure of protection, exceeding the\n37 requirements of WAC 173-303-665(2)(h)(i) for a single geomembrane for the primary liner and\n38 composite for the secondary only. This will provide an extra measure of protection on the bottom flatter\n39 slopes of the IDF, where higher leachate head levels are more likely. A GCL will not be included on the\n40 side slope lining system. The 3H:IV side slopes for the IDF will result in little or no leachate head\n41 expected on the side slope lining system, thus eliminating the need for a lining system design that exceeds\n42 the WAC requirements.\n43 Commercially-available reinforced GCL products consist of bentonite sandwiched between a woven and\n44 non-woven geotextile that are then needle-punched together. Other combinations of upper and lower,\n45 woven and non-woven geotextiles can also be manufactured and specified.\nAppendix 4A. 1.83\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 For the IDF lining system, a needle-punched, reinforced GCL with non-woven geotextiles on both sides\n2 was selected. This type GCL product was selected primarily because of the tensile strength requirements\n3 required for landfill global stability (Section 5.1.3). The tighter weave non-woven geotextile minimizes\n4 the amount of bentonite that migrates to the interface with the geomembrane, thus minimizing the\n5 potential to create a slip surface.\n6 Details of required GCL properties are provided in the technical specifications (see Section 02667).\n7 6.3.2.3 Admix Liner\n8 Details of the admix design test program are provided in Sections 4.2.2 and 5.4.1. Placement and testing\n9 requirements are described in Section 5.4.2.\n10 The admix liner will have a minimum 3-foot thick compacted soil/bentonite admixture and will be located\n11 immediately beneath the secondary HDPE geomembrane, as required by WAC 173-303-665(2)(h)(i)(B).\n12 The admix liner typically will consist of base soil mixed with a nominal 12 percent sodium bentonite, by\n13 dry weight. Mixing and processing of the base soil/bentonite admixture is required to be performed under\n14 carefully controlled conditions, using a pugmill operation.\n15 The base soil for the admix liner will consist of natural soil, derived from the dune sand borrow area to\n16 the south of the Phase I cell (as shown on Drawing H-2-830828) or from within Phase I cell excavations.\n17 Based on the results of the limited field exploration for near surface base soil samples (discussed in\n18 Sections 4.1 and 4.2), base soil from either source will not be excavated below a depth of 5 feet bgs (after\n19 stripping) without further evaluation of the material suitability.\n20 Base soils excavated from the dune sand borrow area or site excavation will meet the following\n21 requirements:\n22 * The base soil will be free of roots, woody vegetation, frozen material, rubbish, and other\n23 deleterious material.\n24 * Rocks greater than 1 inch in dimension will not comprise more than 2 percent by weight of the\n25 base soil.\n26 * Base soil will have 20 percent minimum passing a No. 200 U.S. sieve.\n27 * The in-place hydraulic conductivity of the admix liner will be 10-7 centimeters per second or less,\n28 consistent with WAC requirements for secondary soil liners. The upper surface of the admix\n29 liner will be trimmed to the design grades and tolerances. The surface will be rolled with a\n30 smooth steel-drum roller to remove all ridges and irregularities. The result will be a smooth,\n31 uniform surface on which to place the overlying geomembrane liner.\n32 * Before production installation of the admix liner, a full-scale test pad of the admix liner will be\n33 conducted for both the bottom floor (horizontal) and side slope areas of the IDF. Details of the\n34 test pads are provided in the technical specifications (see Section 02666) and the\n35 IDF Construction QA Plan. The primary purpose of the test pad(s) will be to verify that the\n36 specified soil density, moisture content, and hydraulic conductivity values will be achieved\n37 consistently, using proposed compaction equipment and procedures. In-place density will be\n38 measured using both the nuclear gauge (ASTM D2922) and rubber balloon (ASTM D2167) or\n39 sand cone (ASTM D1556) methods. In-place hydraulic conductivity will be determined from a\n40 two-stage borehole permeameter (ASTM D639 1). Admix liner hydraulic conductivity will be\n41 estimated from thin-wall tube samples (ASTM D1587) obtained from the test fill and tested in the\n42 laboratory (ASTM D5084). During construction, field density (e.g., ASTM D2922, D2167,\n43 and/or D1556) and moisture content (ASTM D2216) will be measured periodically. Thin-wall\n44 tube samples (ASTM D1587) will be taken at regular intervals and will be tested for hydraulic\n45 conductivity (ASTM D5084). Additional details of Construction QA testing and acceptance\n46 during admix liner test pad and production installation is provided in the IDF Construction QA\n47 Plan.\nAppendix 4A.1.84\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Details of required admix liner properties and placement requirements are provided in the technical\n2 specifications (see Section 02666).\n3 6.3.3 Liner Materials-Drainage and Protection Components\n4 6.3.3.1 Geotextiles\n5 Two types and weights of geotextiles will be used in the IDF project. The separation (Type 1) geotextile\n6 has a nominal weight of 6 ounce/square yard and was selected based on the ability of the geotextile to\n7 retain the soil and to prevent the soil from entering the LCRS drain gravel. Required AOS and\n8 permittivity were determined based on filter, fines retention, and clogging potential criteria. The waste\n9 disposed in the IDF is expected to contain a minimal amount of organic material, and consequently,\n10 biologic clogging is not expected to be a problem.\n11 The cushion (Type 2) geotextile has a nominal weight of 12 ounce/square yard and was selected based on\n12 providing the required cushion protection for geomembrane on the landfill bottom (floor). The drain\n13 gravel will have the potential to produce localized stress on the geomembrane liner during gravel\n14 placement with construction equipment and under the maximum static pressure from landfill contents at\n15 full waste height with final cover. A puncture analysis was performed to select a sufficiently thick\n16 geotextile to protect the liner. This analysis included the maximum load from landfill contents and final\n17 cover, expected construction vehicle ground pressures, and maximum drain gravel particle size listed in\n18 the technical specifications.\n19 Both types of geotextiles are specified as non-woven needle-punched and made from polypropylene\n20 material. This material was selected because of its higher chemical resistance to the expected leachate\n21 (Golder Associates, 1991 a).\n22 Details of required geotextile properties are provided in the technical specifications (see Section 02371).\n23 6.3.3.2 CDN\n24 The CDN is a drainage geocomposite consisting of a HDPE geonet core with a layer of non-woven\n25 polypropylene geotextile thermally bonded to each side. The CDN selected for the IDF lining system has\n26 two drainage related functions. On the side slopes, it will function as the LCRS. A CDN is selected for\n27 the LCRS on the side slope to avoid construction stability problems associated with placement of clean\n28 granular material on slopes, thereby minimizing the potential for damaging the underlying liner system.\n29 Localized placement of drain gravel is required on side slopes (as shown on Drawing H-2-830848,\n30 Section C), to provide adequate backfill and bedding for leachate collection riser piping. On the side\n31 slope and bottom lining system, the CDN will function as the LDS.\n32 Analyses were performed to evaluate the geotextile puncture requirements for the LCRS CDN on the side\n33 slope and the transmissivity requirements for both the LCRS and LDS CDN. These analyses and\n34 discussion are presented in Section 5.7.\n35 The analyses for CDN geotextile puncture resistance determined that the specified geotextile is adequate\n36 for resistance to puncture from overlying operations layer, under the maximum static pressure from\n37 landfill contents.\n38 The analyses for allowable transmissivity with applied reduction factors for intrusion, creep, and chemical\n39 and biological clogging determined that a higher flow, thicker (250 mil minimum) CDN is required, due\n40 to the reduction of flow under the high normal loads in the final filling configuration.\n41 Details of required CDN properties are provided in the technical specifications (see Section 02373).\n42 6.3.3.3 Drain Gravel\n43 The LCRS for the bottom liner will be located below the operations layer and will provide a flow path for\n44 the leachate flowing into the LCRS sump and sump trough. Between the operations layer and the\n45 underlying drain gravel, a geotextile layer will function as a filter separation geotextile (as discussed in\n46 Section 6.3.3.1).\nAppendix 4A.1.85\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The separation geotextile will prevent migration of fine soil and clogging of the drain gravel. The gravel\n2 will be a minimum 1-foot thick layer of washed, rounded to subrounded stone, with a hydraulic\n3 conductivity of at least 10-2 cm/sec, as required by WAC 173-303-665(2)(h)(iii)(B). In addition, a slotted\n4 HDPE leachate collection piping will be placed within the drain gravel to accelerate leachate transport\n5 into the LCRS sump during high precipitation events. Slots on the leachate collection piping are sized to\n6 be compatible with the drain gravel gradation and particle sizes. Details of the leachate collection piping\n7 design are provided in Section 6.4.1.\n8 Based on review of expected subsurface conditions for the IDF, it is not likely that material meeting drain\n9 gravel is available on or near the site. Thus, drain gravel will have to be an imported material. The\n10 technical specifications require that drain gravel meet the requirements of WSDOT Standard\n11 Specification 9-03.12(4) for gradation. The technical specifications also require a performance\n12 specification for a hydraulic conductivity greater or equal to 10-1 cm/sec.\n13 As discussed in Section 5.7.3, the minimum estimated hydraulic conductivity for the drain gravel exceeds\n14 the required (by WAC regulations) hydraulic conductivity of 10-2 cm/sec by a factor or 100 to 1,000, and\n15 the performance specification hydraulic conductivity of 10-1 cm/sec by a factor of 10 to 100. This allows\n16 for uncertainty in the empirical formulas used to predict hydraulic conductivity, and the potential for\n17 long-term reduction in hydraulic conductivity in the drain gravel, if fines from waste filling and the\n18 operations layer migrate into this layer over time.\n19 Details of required drain gravel material properties are provided in the technical specifications (see\n20 Section 02315).\n21 6.3.3.4 Operations Layer\n22 The purpose of the operations layer will be to protect the underlying lining system components from\n23 damage by equipment and waste canisters during IDF construction and operation. This layer also will\n24 protect the admix liner from freeze/thaw damage and desiccation cracking. This is especially the case on\n25 the side slopes, expected to be exposed (prior to waste placement) for longer duration than the bottom\n26 (floor) of the IDF cell.\n27 The operations layer material typically will consist of onsite granular soil from the IDF Phase I\n28 excavation. The excavated material is expected to be a fine-grained sand to silty sand with traces of\n29 gravel. The technical specifications require the material to have a maximum particle size limit of\n30 two inches or less, and fines will be limited to maximum 25 percent fines (percent passing the U.S. No.\n31 200 sieve). Based on review of expected subsurface conditions for the IDF excavation, the majority of\n32 soil excavated from the IDF Phase I excavation is expected to be suitable for use as operations layer\n33 without processing, As discussed in Section 4, additional geotechnical exploration within the IDF Phase I\n34 limits are recommended prior to construction to verify these findings.\n35 Details of required operations layer material properties are provided in the technical specifications (see\n36 Section 02315).\n37 6.4 Leachate Collection System\n38 The leachate collection system for each cell in Phase I will consist of lateral flow media built into the\n39 cell's bottom and side slope liner system, a leachate collection pipe in the center of the cell, a sump at the\n40 north end of the cell where all leachate drains, pumps and leachate transfer piping to convey leachate out\n41 of the cell, and a network of piping and storage tanks for storing the leachate for later transfer to tanker\n42 trucks for offsite disposal. Below the bottom liner and under the LCRS sump area will be an LDS sump,\n43 pump, and associated piping. All components for Phase I of the leachate collection system are designed\n44 and configured for eventual full development of the IDF through Phase IV.\n45 The type and configuration of the leachate collection system described below has been used successfully\n46 at other disposal facilities, and a very similar facility was recently (2002) implemented at the INEEL site\n47 near Idaho Falls, Idaho. This ICDF will accept waste with radioactive characteristics and is located in a\n48 region with dry weather conditions, similar to Hanford.\nAppendix 4A. 1.86\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 6.4.1 Leachate Collection Piping\n2 6.4.1.1 Description\n3 Lateral drainage media (drain gravel in the bottom liner section and CDN in the side slope section of each\n4 cell) will convey leachate by gravity to the leachate collection piping and to the LCRS sump area. The\n5 leachate collection piping system in both cells will have one 12-inch diameter HDPE slotted pipe running\n6 the length of the cell centerline from south to north. This main collector pipe will be sloped at 1 percent\n7 and will convey leachate from the south edge of the cell to the LCRS sump at the north end, where the\n8 bottom liner will intersect the side slope liner. The main collection pipe will change to solid pipe at the\n9 bottom of the side slope, continue up the side slope, and terminate at a cleanout, located just south of the\n10 crest pad building. Leachate in the sump will be collected through perforated pipes for the LCRS low\n11 flow and high flow pumps, which will be 12-inch and 18-inch HDPE slotted pipe, respectively. The riser\n12 pipes will protect the pumps and separate them from the surrounding drain gravel, allow removal and re-\n13 insertion of the pumps for maintenance, and provide a high inflow-rate screen for leachate to supply the\n14 pumps. A small-diameter pipe (housing a transducer to control the on/off levels for the pumps) will run\n15 from the LCRS sump up the side slope to the crest pad building.\n16 The slotted portion of the riser pipes will extend from the toe of the side slope to the end of the LCRS\n17 sump area. The transducer pipe will also be slotted but for a shorter distance in the LCRS sump,\n18 whereupon it will be solid for the remaining distance to the crest pad building. A solid HDPE pipe (of the\n19 same diameter as the slotted portion of the pump riser pipes) will extend from the intersection of the side\n20 slope and bottom liner to the top of the shine berm where the pipes enter the crest pad building.\n21 Pipe cleanouts will be provided at both ends of the main collection pipe in the center of each cell. The\n22 cleanout at the north end of Phase I, near the crest pad building, will be permanently available throughout\n23 the life of the IDF to allow access for cleaning and/or video inspection. The cleanout at the south end of\n24 the cell will also be available for cleaning and access, but only during the operation of Phase I. It will be\n25 removed and the Phase II collection pipe will be butt-fused to the pipe as the Phase II cell is brought\n26 online. Ultimately, a permanent cleanout will be installed at the south end of Phase IV, to allow cleaning\n27 and inspection of half of the collection pipe, with the other half being accessed by the permanent cleanout\n28 located at the crest pad building on the north side of Phase I.\n29 Access to the riser pipes for cleanout or inspection, in the unlikely event this is needed, will be through\n30 the access points used for removal and re-insertion of the pumps within the crest pad building.\n31 6.4.1.2 Design Considerations\n32 The material chosen for piping within the Phase I lined area was HDPE , made of resin meeting the\n33 requirements of ASTM D3350 for PE 3408 material, with a cell classification of 345434C or higher.\n34 Design calculations were based on this material and pipe type, which is routinely used for leachate\n35 collection and disposal facilities and other applications. The pipe material is well suited for use in\n36 disposal facilities because of its high strength, high resistance to degradation from leachate constituents,\n37 and superior characteristics compared to all other readily available pipe materials. HDPE compatibility\n38 with leachate and the presence of radioactivity in the waste overlying the pipe were evaluated and\n39 discussed previously in Section 5.6.\n40 The diameter of the riser pipes was chosen to provide ample clearance for the pumps to be inserted and\n41 removed on a routine basis, and specifically so that the pumps will have sufficient clearance when\n42 traveling through the angle points at the intersection of the bottom liner and side slope, and clearance at\n43 the radius transition from the side slope to the crest pad building. The pumps (described in Section 6.4.3)\n44 are specifically designed for this type of leachate collection system, where the riser pipes allow insertion\n45 of pumps down a side slope and into a sump area.\n46 Lateral drainage media in the bottom liner and side slope liner, and the leachate collection piping system\n47 were chosen and configured to meet the regulatory requirement of no more than 12 inches of leachate\n48 head buildup over the sump area of the bottom liner as a result of a 25-year, 24-hour storm event.\nAppendix 4A.1.87\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The slots in the slotted pipe were designed to both be compatible with the granular material in the drain\n2 gravel and to allow a high rate of flow from the surrounding lateral drainage layers into the pipe. Slots\n3 were sized at 0.128 inches wide, with five rows of slots spaced equidistant around the perimeter of the\n4 pipe, and eleven slots per foot of pipe.\n5 The thickness of the pipes expressed as the SDR (standard dimension ratio) was chosen to resist the\n6 highest estimated load for the IDF in its final configuration, including final cover and equipment loading\n7 (internal pressure was not a factor since the pipe will convey flow by gravity, and under the expected flow\n8 rates the pipes will only be partially full). A SDR of 17 was chosen for all piping to handle the maximum\n9 estimated load. In addition, a blanket of manufactured drain gravel will be placed around and to the sides\n10 of all collection piping and compacted to a firm, unyielding condition consistent with the soil modulus\n11 values used in the pipe loading calculations.\n12 All piping will be butt-fused for maximum strength, and all fittings, whether available molded from the\n13 manufacturer or fabricated, will have the same or higher pressure rating than the pipe. During\n14 construction, piping will be butt-fused by certified technicians, using welding equipment approved by the\n15 manufacturer. All solid pipe will be pressure tested, even though the collection piping will see little or no\n16 internal pressure during gravity conveyance of leachate.\n17 6.4.2 Leachate Transfer Piping\n18 6.4.2.1 Description\n19 At each cell, the leachate transfer piping will begin with the piping from the pumps in the LCRS and LDS\n20 sumps to the crest pad building. From the crest pad building, transfer piping will connect the leachate\n21 transfer building, storage tank, and tanker truck load facility. All underground transfer piping outside the\n22 Phase I liner limits will be double contained, that is the pressure pipe conveying leachate between various\n23 facilities will be contained in an outer pipe. The pressure pipe in the center of the double containment\n24 piping will be termed carrier pipe, while the outer pipe will be termed containment pipe. In the event of a\n25 leak in the carrier pipe, the containment pipe or leak detection pipes draining the containment pipes will\n26 convey the leakage to a combined sump facility for detection, sampling, and transfer. Any accumulation\n27 of leachate in the combined sump will be pumped through a transfer pipe to the storage tank. Piping\n28 within the crest pad building, transfer building, truck load facility, and combined sump, will not be double\n29 contained because the buildings or facilities will provide secondary containment and have sumps present\n30 to remove any leachate that accumulates as a result of leaking pipes or appurtenances. Leak detection\n31 pipes draining containment pipes and the leak detection pipe from the storage tank will be single pipes\n32 because they only will convey leakage and will not function as transfer piping (required to have double\n33 containment).\n34 The transfer piping system also will include valves, fittings, flow meters, and other appurtenances\n35 necessary for operational functions for systems described in Sections 6.4.3, 6.4.4, and 6.4.5.\n36 6.4.2.2 Design Considerations\n37 All transfer piping outside of buildings will meet the same requirements as the HDPE pipe chosen for the\n38 leachate collection piping (described in Section 6.4.1). Single pipe and containment pipe exposed to earth\n39 and traffic loading will be SDR 17, while the carrier pipe, that will not be exposed to earth or traffic\n40 loading, will be SDR 21, with a pressure rating of 80 psi and a safety factor of 2 for the highest expected\n41 operating pressure in the system (SDR 17 piping has a pressure rating of 100 psi). All piping will be\n42 butt-fused except for the transfer piping from the LCRS and LDS sump pumps. This pipe will be HDPE,\n43 with quick release fittings to allow removal of the pumps from the sumps. Fittings will be pressure rated\n44 and re-useable. As the pumps are withdrawn from the sumps and moved up the riser pipes, each joint in\n45 the pipe will be unhinged to allow the pipe to be removed in 8-foot sections.\n46 Piping inside buildings will be PVC, schedule 80, with solvent welded fittings. This pipe and\n47 classification is rated for higher pressure than required with a factor of safety of 8. PVC was chosen for\n48 application inside buildings because of its relative ease of fabrication with the solvent weld joint system.\nAppendix 4A.1.88\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Flange connections will be used between pumps and piping; valves and other appurtenances and piping;\n2 and joints between PVC and HDPE piping. Appurtenances will include air release valves to allow\n3 purging of any air trapped in the piping system, magnetic flow meters for measuring flow to the tanker\n4 truck load output and to and from the leachate storage tanks, and valves for flow control and diversion of\n5 flow between the various facilities. The flow control scheme and control logic for the transfer piping\n6 system are described in Section 6.4.5.\n7 6.4.3 Leachate System Pumps\n8 Three submersible leachate pumps will be required for each cell. For convenience and operational\n9 versatility, roller-mounted pumps were selected for all leachate removal facilities. The submersible\n10 pumps are standard stainless steel well pumps that have been installed within a screened stainless steel\n11 cylinder fitted with rollers. The configuration will allow the pumps to be installed from the crest pad\n12 building within riser piping that follows the slope of the landfill until the riser piping bends horizontally\n13 to terminate within the cell sump at the toe of slope. This type of pump can be lowered into the leachate\n14 sump through the riser pipe and removed as needed, using a winch mounted within the crest pad building.\n15 Each pump will have its foot valve removed to prevent freezing or retaining of the leachate in the pump\n16 discharge piping. Advantages of this type of pump include easy access for maintenance and inspection,\n17 no power equipment required to remove/install, and its small size will lend itself to being inserted within\n18 a curved riser pipe and evacuating nearly all of the leachate within the cell sump. Each pump will have\n19 the capability to pump either to the storage tank or truck loading station.\n20 6.4.3.1 LCRS Pumps\n21 Two of the three submersible pumps will be installed within the LCRS sump area of each cell above the\n22 primary liner. These pumps are required to maintain less than 12 inches of hydraulic head above the\n23 primary liner, per regulatory requirements. The pumps will be installed in a 6-inch depression within the\n24 LCRS, in order to minimize the area of permanent leachate storage at pump shutoff and allow full pump\n25 operation through the 12-inch maximum liner head zone over the primary liner. Only in the localized\n26 area of the LCRS sump depression will a maximum leachate head of 18 inches cover the primary liner.\n27 The leachate head over the primary liner will be maintained at or below 12 inches in the main sump area\n28 and throughout the landfill. One low-flow pump is required for typical pumping of leachate; a high-flow\n29 pump is necessary in the event that a large storm (24-hour, 25-year storm event) exceeds the capacity of\n30 the low-flow pump.\n31 The selection of the low-flow pump was based on the average leachate flow from the landfill, determined\n32 in the leachate production analysis (Section 5.8.1). The analysis indicated that the maximum leachate\n33 flow, based on monthly data, is approximately 13 gpm. The hydraulics of the low-flow pump was\n34 modeled and a pump was selected, based on the hydraulic characteristics of the piping system and the\n35 required flow rate, determined in the leachate system hydraulics analysis (Section 5.9.2.1). An EPG\n36 Companies, Inc. (EPG) model WSD 3-3 (or equal) with a 0.5-horsepower motor was selected for the\n37 LCRS low-flow pump.\n38 The selection of the high-flow pump was based on the 24-hour, 25-year storm event, determined in the\n39 leachate production analysis (Section 5.8.1). The analysis indicated that the high-flow pump capacity\n40 necessary to remove the leachate per regulatory guidelines is approximately 160 gpm. The hydraulics of\n41 the high-flow pump was modeled and a pump was selected, based on the hydraulic characteristics of the\n42 piping system and the required flow rate, determined in the leachate system hydraulics analysis\n43 (Section 5.9.2.1). An EPG model WSD 30-3 (or equal) with a 7.5-horsepower motor was selected for the\n44 LCRS high-flow pump.\n45 6.4.3.2 LDS Pump\n46 The third submersible pump will be installed within each cell in the LDS sump, under the primary liner\n47 and above the secondary liner.\nAppendix 4A.1.89\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI This pump will detect and recover leachate that has leaked through the primary liner by pumping the\n2 leachate to the crest pad building. This pump was sized for low leachate generation flows.\n3 The hydraulics of the LDS pump were modeled and a pump was selected that can produce 4 gpm, based\n4 on the hydraulic characteristics of the piping system and the required flow rate, identified in the leachate\n5 system hydraulics analysis (Section 5.9.2.1). An EPG model 1.5-3 (or equal) with a 0.5-horsepower\n6 motor was selected for the LDS pump.\n7 6.4.3.3 Crest Pad Building Sump Pump\n8 The sump pump within the crest pad building will be a submersible floor sump, activated by float\n9 switches within the floor sump. The function of the sump pump is to remove leachate that accumulates in\n10 the crest pad building as a result of unexpected spills or pipe leaks. The pump discharges water to the\n11 leachate storage tank via the crest pad building discharge piping.\n12 The hydraulics of the sump pump was modeled and a pump was specified, based on the hydraulic\n13 characteristics of the piping system and the required flow rate identified in the leachate system hydraulics\n14 analysis (Section 5.9.2.1).\n15 6.4.3.4 Leachate Transfer Pump\n16 The leachate storage tank will be drained by using the leachate transfer pump, located in the leachate\n17 transfer building. The pump was sized to deliver a capacity of 250 gpm to the truck loading station,\n18 where it will discharge into a tanker truck. The typical volume allowed in a tanker truck is 7,000 gallons,\n19 corresponding to a loading time of approximately 30 minutes.\n20 The hydraulics of the leachate transfer pump was modeled and a pump was selected, based on the\n21 hydraulic characteristics of the piping system and the required flow rate, identified in the leachate system\n22 hydraulics analysis (Section 5.9.2.1). A standard horizontal centrifugal pump, Paco model 30707 (or\n23 equal) with a 3-horsepower motor was selected for the leachate transfer pump.\n24 6.4.3.5 Combined Sump Pump\n25 The combined sump will be a 76-inch-diameter HDPE manhole with a 42 inch diameter HDPE manhole\n26 placed inside. The outer manhole will have a height of approximately 8 feet, and the inner manhole\n27 height will be approximately 6 feet. The secondary containment portion of all the buried HDPE pipelines,\n28 leachate tank, and leachate transfer building floor sump will drain to the annular space (leak detection\n29 chamber) between the two manholes. The leak detection chamber will include instrumentation to detect\n30 leachate and alarm accordingly. The sumps installed within the truck loading slab typically will collect\n31 precipitation that drains off the slab. The precipitation will be conveyed directly to the inner manhole of\n32 the combined sump, where the combined sump pump will be located. The combined sump pump then\n33 will pump the precipitation to the leachate storage tank.\n34 The combined sump pump was conservatively sized for a capacity of 250 gpm. This large capacity was\n35 chosen based on an off-normal event that assumed the tanker truck was overtopped during leachate\n36 transfer activities, resulting in 250 gpm flowing into the inner sump. Another off-normal event\n37 considered was the remote possibility that the leachate tank primary liner failed catastrophically. This\n38 flow of leachate could eventually inundate the leak detection chamber and overflow into the inner\n39 manhole.\n40 The hydraulics of the combined sump pump was modeled and a pump was selected based on the\n41 hydraulic characteristics of the piping system and the required flow rate, identified in the leachate system\n42 hydraulics analysis (Section 5.9.2.1). A Hydromatic model SB3S (or equal) with a 3-horsepower motor\n43 was selected for the combined sump pump.\nAppendix 4A. 1.90\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 6.4.4 Leachate Temporary Storage Tank\n2 6.4.4.1 Tank Volume\n3 A leachate temporary storage tank is required for each cell. The working capacity of each tank is 375,000\n4 gallons that include a 1.5 safety factor. This volume is based on the results of the leachate production\n5 analysis (Section 5.8.1) and the leachate collection storage analyses (Section 5.9.2.4). The storage tank\n6 capacity is dependent on the net volume of leachate accumulation in the tank from flow into and out of\n7 the tank. The flow out of the tank via the leachate transfer pump is based on several assumptions,\n8 described in Section 5.9.2.4. Actual leachate transfer operations will affect the tank volume safety factor.\n9 6.4.4.2 Tank Design\n10 A bolted, corrugated steel tank, approximately 100 feet in diameter with a side wall height of 8 feet\n11 2 inches, was selected for use as the leachate temporary storage tank. The tank will include a dual\n12 containment liner system that will act as the floor of the tank and will be bolted to the top of the tank side\n13 wall. The tank will be open-topped with a floating geomembrane cover to keep precipitation, debris, and\n14 wildlife from contacting the leachate.\n15 The tank side wall will be bolted to a 1.5-foot thick, 4-foot-deep concrete ringwall to resist hydrostatic\n16 pressure of the leachate water. In addition, the top edge of the tank ringwall will include angle bracing,\n17 bolted around the tank perimeter to provide rigidity in the side wall to resist wind loads on the exterior of\n18 the tank. The maximum operating level of the tank is approximately 6 feet 2 inches; however, the tank is\n19 designed for a maximum water level of 8 feet 2 inches.\n20 The inlet piping for the tank will be through the side wall of the tank. The inlets will all be located near\n21 the top of the tank, above the maximum leachate water operating level. This is to ensure that a siphon\n22 cannot develop in the inlet piping. Check valves will be installed throughout the system; however, if\n23 piping between the check valve and the tank leaked into the secondary containment system, there would\n24 not be an easy method of stopping the flow if the pipe was below the water surface of the tank.\n25 The outlet pipe for the tank will be through the side wall, near the bottom of the tank. This method was\n26 chosen to provide a flooded suction for the leachate transfer pump that will provide added protection\n27 against pump damage.\n28 6.4.4.3 Tank Liners\n29 The tank liners will be constructed with an XR-5 geomembrane. XR-5 is a proprietary geomembrane\n30 manufactured by Seaman Corporation. XR-5 is the preferred liner of several tank manufacturers due to\n31 its higher strength properties and lower thermal expansion coefficient, as compared to HDPE\n32 geomembrane. As such, it is more readily constructible in the tank configuration, and it does not expand\n33 and contract as much as HDPE, so it's operating performance over the temperature range at Hanford\n34 should be improved. For the exposed condition at the IDF tanks, this is an important consideration.\n35 HDPE was considered for use as the tank liner system, but its high coefficient of expansion will not lend\n36 itself to the temperature extremes that the liner system will be subjected to and also it is not reinforced\n37 like the XR-5. The expansion and contraction of an HDPE liner exposed to the environment could put\n38 undue strain at the inlet and outlet connections as well as at the leak detection connection that could result\n39 in liner leakage.\n40 Chemical compatibility of leachate with the liner system is also a consideration for liner material\n41 selection for the leachate storage tanks. As discussed in Section 5.6.3.1, compatibility testing on HDPE\n42 geomembrane was performed with synthetic leachate for the W-025 landfill with no evidence of\n43 geomembrane deterioration. With regard to leachate compatibility, XR-5 is comparable to HDPE in\n44 terms of compatibility with typical leachate constituents. The geomembrane manufacturer requires\n45 immersion testing for conclusive compatibility determination. Testing of this type has not been\n46 performed, but the manufacturer is confident that immersion testing results will be acceptable since XR-5\n47 is generally comparable to HDPE.\nAppendix 4A. 1.91\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI To address the issue of chemical and radiation resistance for XR-5 with anticipated leachate constituents,\n2 an immersion test program is included in the technical specifications for the tank liner. Details are\n3 provided in Section 13205 of the technical specifications. This immersion testing program requires the\n4 construction general contractor to submit tank liner sample coupons to the design engineer for immersion\n5 testing, as part of the construction submittal process and certification of the tank liner.\n6 In addition, it should be noted that leachate compatibility is not as critical an issue for the tank system as\n7 compared to the landfill liner system. The leachate tank liner system will be subject to continuous\n8 monitoring through the tanks' LDS, as is the landfill liner system. The difference is that the tank liners\n9 will be subject to routine maintenance and inspection that will be developed around liner warranty,\n10 performance observation, and manufacturer's requirements. Operation and maintenance procedures for\n11 the tank will be established that require that the tanks be drained, sediment removed, and the liner\n12 inspected for holes and seam integrity. Since liner performance guarantees are required in the technical\n13 specifications for the tank manufacturer for three years following installation, it is likely that the\n14 inspection program would be initially set up around this time frame and gradually be increased over the\n15 life cycle of the tank. Replacement of the leachate tank liner system is anticipated periodically\n16 throughout the life cycle of the landfill.\n17 The tank lining system is a double-lined system. The primary and secondary tank liners will include a\n18 LDS beneath the primary tank liner. The LDS consists of a HDPE drainage net with a geotextile material,\n19 laminated to the drainage net that cushions the XR-5 liner. A geotextile material will also be used\n20 between the secondary liner and the inside face of the tank shell to create a cushion for the XR-5 against\n21 the tank shell and tank shell bolt heads. The bolt heads are also recessed for further liner protection.\n22 6.4.4.4 Tank Leak Containment System\n23 The HDPE drainage net between the primary and secondary liner will allow leachate that leaks through\n24 the primary liner to drain to the center of the tank. At the center of the tank under the secondary liner will\n25 be a depression in the underlying granular backfill that will form a shallow sump. The leak detection pipe\n26 will connect to the secondary liner at this sump location and convey leaking leachate to the leak detection\n27 chamber of the combined sump.\n28 The tank inlet and outlet penetrations will be areas susceptible to leaks as a result of penetrations through\n29 the primary liner. Additional robust methods for sealing these locations were added over and above the\n30 typical manufacturer recommendations in an effort to make sure that these will not be points of leakage.\n31 6.4.5 Pump Controls and System Instrumentation\n32 The process and instrumentation diagrams for Cell I and Cell 2 are shown on Drawing H-2-830854,\n33 sheets I through 4. Detailed information regarding the instrumentation and control system, equipment\n34 listing, instrument listing, and loop descriptions can be found in the technical specifications, Section\n35 13401 (Process Instrumentation and Control System).\n36 6.4.5.1 Crest Pad Building\n37 The leachate pumps within the landfill will be automatically controlled, based on leachate level set points\n38 within the cell sump. The level transducer that controls the LCRS pumps will be inserted into the sump\n39 via a slope riser pipe. The level transducer that controls the LDS pump is integral to the LDS pump.\n40 Leachate pumped by the leachate pumps will be monitored by a flow-indicating totalizer within the crest\n41 pad building. Controls will be in place to stop automatically the leachate pumps operation if alarm\n42 conditions are present for the leachate storage tank high-high level, leak alarm in the crest pad building\n43 sump, or a leak alarm in the combined sump.\n44 The crest pad building sump pump will be automatically controlled by float switches within the building\n45 floor sump. In addition, a leak detection switch will be installed in the floor sump that will be capable of\n46 detecting small quantities of water in the sump before the float switches. This feature will add an extra\n47 level of conservatism to make sure unexpected spills are identified and controlled immediately.\nAppendix 4A. 1.92\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Controls will be in place to stop automatically the crest pad building sump pump operation if alarm\n2 conditions are present for the leachate storage tank high-high level or for a leak alarm in the combined\n3 sump.\n4 6.4.5.2 Leachate Transfer Building\n5 The leachate transfer pump will be manually controlled except for automatic shut-off during specific\n6 alarm events. Controls will be in place to stop automatically the transfer pump operation if alarm\n7 conditions are present for the leachate storage tank low-low level or for leak alarm in the combined sump.\n8 Additional instrumentation (associated with the leachate transfer pump) will include a flow meter\n9 (measuring rate and total volume) and transmitter on the discharge of the leachate transfer pump. In\n10 addition, a local totalizer will be in the leachate transfer building to know exactly how much water is\n11 being transferred to the tanker truck. This totalizer will include a reset function to allow the total to be\n12 reset to zero, prior to every truck loading event.\n13 6.4.5.3 Leachate Storage Tank\n14 Instrumentation within the leachate storage tank will be contained within two vertical stilling wells that\n15 will penetrate through openings in the floating cover. The stilling wells will be small diameter pipe with\n16 perforations near the bottom that will allow the leachate within the stilling well to rise and fall with the\n17 level of the leachate in the tank. Analog instrumentation within one stilling well will provide a signal to\n18 the control system for alarm interlocks and constant monitoring of tank level. The second stilling well\n19 will contain discrete instrumentation for high-high and low-low alarm set point trips. The discrete\n20 instrumentation will provide conservatism in the off chance that the analog signal malfunctions, allowing\n21 the leachate level to reach extreme high or low levels.\n22 6.4.5.4 Combined Sump\n23 The combined sump pump will be automatically controlled by float switches within the inner manhole of\n24 the combined sump. Controls will also be in place to stop automatically the combined sump pump\n25 operation if alarm conditions are present for the leachate storage tank high-high level. A leak detection\n26 switch also will be installed within the leak detection chamber that will be capable of detecting a small\n27 quantity of water. The leak detection switch will provide a signal to the control system that automatically\n28 will shut down all the cell pumps except the combined sump pump. The pumps will be shut down\n29 because any one of the pipelines associated with the pumps could be leaking into the leak detection\n30 chamber. Operations will then need to determine which secondary containment pipeline supplied the\n31 water that drained into the leak detection chamber.\n32 6.4.6 Process Instrument Control System (PICS)\n33 6.4.6.1 Introduction\n34 This section provides a summary of the PICS design and construction elements of the project, providing\n35 introduction and reference to the project layout and key design components for the following IDF\n36 facilities:\n37 * IDF leachate collection and handling crest pad facilities (two each)\n38 * IDF leachate storage tank and leachate transfer facilities (two each)\n39 * IDF truck loading facilities (two each)\n40 The PICS design identifies, specifies and integrates PICS components to automatically monitor and\n41 control IDF process control equipment and facilities including:\n42 * LCRS\n43 * LDS\n44 * Crest pad and leachate transfer building environmental controls\n45 * Leachate storage tank system\nAppendix 4A. 1.93\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * Leachate transfer and truck loading system\n2 * Combined sump system\n3 * Secondary containment LDS\n4 6.4.6.2 Key Design Components (Elements)\n5 PICS design and construction elements of the project incorporate the following key PICS design\n6 components for each IDF facility:\n7 * Instrumentation for continuous analog process monitoring\n8 * Instrumentation for discrete process monitoring\n9 * Instruments and programmed safety interlocks and alarming\n10 * Programmable logic controller (PLC) system\n11 * Operator Interface Unit (OIU)\n12 * Communication Local Area Network (LAN)\n13 * PICS application software\n14 * Main and local control panels\n15 * Uninterruptible power supply\n16 6.4.6.3 Open Items\n17 The IDF Phase I Critical Systems design documents do not identify the following items:\n18 * Identification of communication LAN from IDF control panels to central supervisory control and\n19 data acquisition (SCADA)\n20 * Extension of communication LAN from IDF control panels to central SCADA\n21 These items are scheduled to be addressed during the IDF Phase I Non-Critical design of the project. As\n22 such, the following assumptions were made in order to complete IDF Phase I Critical Systems design:\n23 * Assume 10/100 megabits per second (MBPS) Ethernet communication LAN from IDF control\n24 panels to central SCADA\n25 * Assume fiber-optic multi-mode extension of communication LAN from IDF control panels to\n26 central SCADA\n27 6.4.6.4 PICS Architectures\n28 The PICS design identifies various architectures, designed to enable operators to locally and remotely\n29 interface and change program settings by the use of an Ethernet LAN. This document does not identify\n30 components and architectures to be provided and configured under the IDF Phase I Non-Critical design in\n31 order for personnel remote monitor and control processes over the LAN.\n32 6.4.6.5 PICS Instrumentation Architecture\n33 The PICS design identifies instrumentation architecture that consists of single variable level (submersible\n34 pressure), flow, and temperature elements and transmitters that provide continuous process data to PICS\n35 PLC and OIU architectures. Process signals from each instrument are monitored for the purpose of\n36 controlling, displaying, recording, and alarming all process data. PICS instrumentation will be wired\n37 directly into PLC input modules (i.e., Allen-Bradley 1746 1/0 modules).\n38 6.4.6.6 Instrumentation\n39 The PICS design identifies all set-point adjustments as being programmed into the PLC via the OIU\n40 architecture. Field instruments incorporate the following signal types:\n41 * Analog signals, current type: 4-20 mA dc signals conforming to ISA S50.1.1\n42 * Transmitters type: 2-wire and 4-wire\nAppendix 4A. 1.94\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * Transmitter load resistance capacity: Class L\n2 * Fully isolated transmitters and receivers\n3 * Discrete signals, voltage type: 24 VDC\n4 6.4.6.7 Analog Instrumentation\n5 The PICS design identifies flow analog instrumentation, consisting of electromagnetic flow elements and\n6 integral transmitters that will enable operators to monitor pump discharge flow for the following\n7 processes:\n8 * Landfill LCRS pump discharge flow\n9 * Landfill LDS pump discharge flow\n10 * Leachate transfer truck loading station discharge flow\n11 The PICS design identifies level analog instrumentation, consisting of submersible pressure transmitters\n12 that will enable operators to monitor liquid levels for the following:\n13 * Landfill LCRS\n14 * Landfill LDS\n15 * Leachate storage tank system\n16 The PICS design identifies temperature analog instrumentation, consisting of an element and transmitter\n17 that will enable operators to monitor temperature levels inside the following:\n18 * Crest pad buildings\n19 * Leachate transfer buildings\n20 6.4.6.8 Discrete Instrumentation\n21 The PICS design identifies level instrumentation, consisting of radio frequency (RF) admittance probes\n22 and transmitters that will enable operators to monitor discrete liquid levels inside the leachate storage tank\n23 system. The PICS design identifies level discrete instrumentation, consisting of magnetic float switches\n24 that will enable operators to monitor discrete liquid levels inside the following:\n25 * Crest pad building sump\n26 * Combine sump\n27 * Combine sump interstitial\n28 The PICS design identifies operator instrumentation, consisting of switches, indicating lights, and control\n29 relays that will enable operators to monitor the following discrete status:\n30 * Crest pad building and control power status\n31 * Landfill LCRS pumps ON/OFF, AUTO and FAIL status\n32 * Landfill LDS pumps (on/off, auto, and fail) status\n33 * Combined process sump pump (on/off, auto, and fail) status\n34 * Leachate transfer pump (on/off, auto, and fail) status\n35 6.4.6.9 PICS Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) Architecture\n36 The PICS design identifies PLC architecture designed around Allen Bradley Ethernet small logic control\n37 technologies. PLC architecture consists of the following:\n38 * PLC processor\n39 * PLC input/output (1/0) modules\n40 * PLC ancillary power supplies, chassis and cabling\n41 * PLC application and development software and hardware\nAppendix 4A. 1.95\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * The PLC processor is the microprocessor-based device that uses programmable ladder logic for\n2 implementing process monitoring and control, emulating the functions of conventional panel-\n3 mounted equipment such as relays, timers, counters, current switches, calculation modules,\n4 Proportional, Integral and Derivative controllers, stepping switches, and drum programmers.\n5 * PLC(s) are programmed to interface with instrumentation and process motor control equipment.\n6 PICS PLC(s) are programmed to automatically operate (start/stop) all process control equipment\n7 as well as process flow totals, equipment runtime, operation alarms, equipment, and building\n8 status.\n9 * Instrument architecture (analog and discrete control devices) interface with PLC via PLC 1/0\n10 modules, installed in a common chassis with the PLC power supply.\n11 * The type of I/O modules utilized include analog (4-20 mA) input, 24VDC discrete input, and\n12 120VAC/ 24VDC discrete output.\n13 * The PICS design identifies PLC application software that provides functions unique to the project\n14 and not provided by PLC system software alone, such as programmable controller ladder logic,\n15 math operations on input process variables (scaling, alarming, totalizing, comparisons).\n16 * The PICS design identifies PLC standard system software packages that enable personnel to\n17 communicate and program PLC processor and configure I/O modules. PLC development and\n18 application software reside on the programming laptop from which the application is downloaded\n19 into the PLC processor.\n20 The PICS design identifies communication protocols establishing data exchange between PLC,\n21 programming laptop, OIU architecture, and future remote SCADA as follows:\n22 * Allen Bradley RS-232, RS-4585, and DFi\n23 * Ethernet\n24 6.4.6.10 PICS Operator Interface (OIU) Architecture\n25 The PICS design identifies OIU architecture that allows operators to visually monitor process system data\n26 and interface with the facility's programmable logic controllers. OIU enables operators to view alarms\n27 and change process set points.\n28 PICS OIU architecture is designed around Allen Bradley PanelView, communicating with PLC\n29 architecture over a communication local area network. OIU architecture includes:\n30 * OIU assembly\n31 * Local area network copper cabling\n32 * OIU application and standard system software\n33 * The PICS design identifies OIU application software that provides functions unique to the project\n34 and not provided by system software alone. These include, but are not limited to, programmable\n35 controller ladder logic, databases, reports, control strategies, graphical display screens, and\n36 operation scripts.\n37 * The PICS design identifies OIU standard system software packages that enable personnel to\n38 communicate and program OlU. OIU application and standard system software reside on the\n39 programming laptop from which the application is downloaded into the OIU processor.\n40 6.4.6.11 PICS Communication LAN Architecture\n41 The PICS design identifies communication between PLC processors, OlU, programming laptop, and\n42 future IDF SCADA over a local area network consisting of a local 10/100 MBPS Ethernet switch, local\n43 PLC, OIU LAN drivers, and a cable system. The PLC processor and OIU are addressable over the LAN,\n44 allowing each device to share data and control points between each other and future devices.\nAppendix 4A. 1.96\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 6.4.6.12 Back Up Power\n2 The PICS design identifies UPS mounted inside each main control panel. UPS(s) was sized to enable\n3 PLC and OIU networks to maintain monitoring of process control systems during a power failure as well\n4 as provide for an orderly shutdown. UPS does NOT power process control equipment such as solenoids,\n5 instruments, motorized valves, pumps, and motors.\n6 6.4.6.13 Control Panels\n7 The PICS design identifies the main control panel, mounted inside each crest pad building housing PLC\n8 processor and associated I/O modules, ancillary power supplies, termination devices, UPS, and control\n9 circuit protection devices. OIU and process flow and level indicators are mounted on front doors of\n10 control panels.\n11 The PICS design identifies local control panels, integrating discrete level instrumentation, control relays,\n12 intrinsic safety relays, and providing interlock signals between PLC architecture and MCC pump controls.\n13 6.5 Stormwater Management\n14 The proposed stormwater system to be constructed just south of the south end of the Phase I excavation\n15 will intercept stormwater runoff from the area to the south for the 24-hour, 25-year storm event so that it\n16 will not flow into the Phase I excavation and will discharge the intercepted stormwater into the ground via\n17 infiltration. This system will consist of the south stormwater berm/ditch, two culverts, and the east and\n18 west infiltration areas. The berm will be two feet high above the existing ground surface. The minimum\n19 combined depth of the berm and ditch will be two feet. The ditch will be V-shaped with 3:1 side slopes.\n20 The culverts will be 18-inch-diameter, corrugated polyethylene pipe with smooth interior. Geotextile and\n21 quarry spalls will be placed around each end of the culverts to provide erosion protection. The east and\n22 west infiltration areas will have bottom lengths of 220 and 225 feet, respectively. Each of the infiltration\n23 areas will have a bottom elevation of 719 feet and a bottom width of 15 feet. In order to allow access for\n24 future maintenance into each of these infiltration areas, their north and south ends will be sloped at 15\n25 percent and surfaced with quarry spalls placed on a geotextile.\n26 The proposed stormwater system to be constructed at the south toe of slope within the Phase I excavation\n27 will intercept stormwater runoff from the unlined portions of the excavation for the 24-hour, 25-year\n28 storm event so that it will not flow into the active cells and will discharge the intercepted stormwater into\n29 the ground via infiltration. This system will consist of the excavation stormwater berm/ditch, a\n30 stormwater pipe, one catch basin, and the excavation infiltration area. There also will be a flow path\n31 along the south side of the access ramp that will continue along the south side of the flat area at the base\n32 of the access ramp and into the southwest corner of the excavation infiltration area. The south stormwater\n33 berm/ditch will slope to drain to the east. The combined depth of the berm and ditch will be two feet.\n34 The stormwater berm will be 2 feet high at its west end, and the corresponding depth of the ditch will be\n35 zero. The berm will gradually reduce in height as the depth of the ditch increases. The berm will end\n36 when the ditch depth reaches 2 feet. The ditch will be V-shaped with 3:1 side slope on the south and 2:1\n37 side slope on the north. The stormwater pipe will be 18-inch-diameter corrugated polyethylene pipe with\n38 smooth interior. Geotextile and quarry spalls will be placed around each exposed end of the stormwater\n39 pipe to provide erosion protection. The catch basin will be used to lower the elevation of the stormwater\n40 pipe so that there will be adequate cover over the pipe for protection against wheel loads. The infiltration\n41 area will have a bottom elevation of 678 feet, a bottom width of 15 feet, and a bottom length of 50 feet.\n42 In order to allow access for future maintenance into this infiltration area, the west end will be sloped at 15\n43 percent and surfaced with quarry spalls placed on a geotextile.\n44 If the water builds up in the east or west infiltration area, it will eventually flow out of the north end of the\n45 infiltration area. The water would flow overland, north along the toe of the fill for the berm access road,\n46 and continue generally northward.\n47 If the water builds up in the excavation infiltration area so that it extends into the ditch, then the operator\n48 will have to bring in a portable pump and pump the water into the east infiltration area.\nAppendix 4A. 1.97\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Maintenance for each of the infiltration areas, the ditches, and the ends of each of the culverts and\n2 stormwater pipes will be primarily to remove accumulated sediment and debris.\n3 6.6 Building Systems\n4 6.6.1 .Crest Pad Buildings\n5 The crest pad building is designed as a pre-engineered, rigid frame metal building on a slab-on grade\n6 foundation. The building slab is separated into two portions. The lower portion of the slab is where the\n7 piping associated with the leachate pipe will be contained, and the higher slab is where the electrical and\n8 control equipment will be located. The slab where the leachate piping will be located is lowered to create\n9 a containment area for the leachate. Construction joints within this area have waterstops to ensure that\n10 leachate cannot egress through the construction joints. Additionally, a sump has been placed to drain the\n11 containment area, if required. The entire floor and sump area also is to be coated to provide even greater\n12 resistance to the leachate.\n13 6.6.2 Leachate Transfer Buildings\n14 The leachate transfer building is designed as a pre-engineered, self-framing metal building on a slab-on-\n15 grade foundation. The metal building is supported on an 8-inch curb that travels continuously around the\n16 exterior of the building. The curb is continuous, even through the door threshold, to provide a\n17 containment area for the leachate in case of spillage. In order to maintain conformance with building\n18 code requirements, a landing is used to eliminate the curb tripping hazard at the door threshold.\n19 Construction joints within this area have waterstops to ensure that leachate cannot egress through the\n20 construction joints. Additionally, a sump has been placed to drain the containment area, if required. The\n21 entire floor and sump area also is to be coated to provide even greater resistance to the leachate.\n22 6.6.3 Truck Loading Station\n23 The truck loading station is designed to receive trucks to load with leachate. The station is essentially a\n24 slab-on-grade. The station is designed to contain minor spillage of leachate by sloping the floor slab\n25 towards the center and using rounded curbs at the slab entrance and exits. Two sumps will be placed in\n26 the center of the station to drain the station as required. The entire floor and sump area also is to be\n27 coated to provide even greater resistance to the leachate.\n28 6.7 Electrical Service and Lighting\n29 6.7.1 Introduction\n30 This section provides a summary of the electrical design and construction elements of the project,\n31 providing introduction and reference to the project layout and key design components for the following\n32 IDF facilities:\n33 * IDF leachate collection and handling crest pad facilities (two each)\n34 * IDF leachate storage tank and leachate transfer facilities (two each)\n35 * IDF truck loading facilities (two each)\n36 The electrical design identifies, specifies, and integrates power distribution systems that incorporate\n37 transformers, breaker panels, motor control, safety switches, conductors, and lighting for the safe,\n38 reliable, and maintainable operation of IDF process and facility equipment including:\n39 * Process equipment (leachate collection and removal pump motors, leak detection pump motors,\n40 transfer pump motors, and instrumentation)\n41 0 Building facility equipment (lighting, power outlets, heating units, cooling fans, and building\n42 sump pumps)\n43 * Personnel and equipment safety systems (standby egress lighting, process alarm lighting, surge\n44 protection, and process piping heat trace)\n45 * Electrical design and installation shall be in accordance with NFPA 70 (NEC, 2002)\nAppendix 4A. 1.98\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 6.7.2 Key Design Components (Elements)\n2 Key electrical design components (elements) for each IDF facility include:\n3 * Electrical secondary service and monitoring\n4 * Electrical secondary service and feeder protective device coordination\n5 * Electrical secondary service ground electrode system\n6 * Electrical service, equipment, and associated metal structures grounding\n7 * Electrical low voltage motor control\n8 * Facility maintenance outlets (standard, ground fault circuit interrupter [GFCI], weatherproof)\n9 * Facility interior, exterior, and egress safety lighting\n10 * Facility environmental control (heating and cooling)\n11 * Facility hazardous classification\n12 * Process equipment heat trace, ambient monitoring, and power indication\n13 * Facility electrical system surge and phase protection\n14 * Materials and methods of electrical construction (i.e., conduit, wire, control and safety device,\n15 and enclosure selection)\n16 6.7.3 Open Items\n17 IDF Phase I Critical System design documents do not identify the following primary and secondary\n18 electrical service items:\n19 * Exact location of primary 13.8 kV, 3-phase tie-in\n20 * Exact value of available primary short circuit current at primary tie-in location\n21 * Exact length of primary extension\n22 * Exact location, size, and impedance of utility step-down 13.8 kV -480/277V, 3-phase, 4-wire\n23 pad mounted transformer(s)\n24 6.7.4 Assumptions to Open Items\n25 These items are scheduled to be addressed during the IDF Phase I Non-Critical design. As such, the\n26 following assumptions were made in order to complete the Phase I design:\n27 * Assume electrical service gear inside each Cell I and Cell 2 crest pad building are powered by\n28 separate pad mounted utility transformers.\n29 * Assume pad mounted utility transformers are rated 75 kVA and are installed within 100 feet of\n30 respective Cell I and Cell 2 crest pad buildings.\n31 * Assume each pad mounted utility transformer is radial fed from a common .13.8 kV primary\n32 feeder.\n33 * Assume each Cell I and Cell 2 leachate transfer building is powered from electrical service gear,\n34 located inside respective crest pad buildings.\n35 * Assume utility short-circuit contribution to be 100 MVA at 13.8 kV, three-phase.\n36 6.7.5 Crest Pad Building Electrical Secondary Service and Metering\n37 Electrical design identified 480 volt, 3-phase, 4-wire secondary service cables eventually powering a\n38 service-rated MCC mounted inside each crest pad building.\nAppendix 4A. 1.99\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nType Designation Configuration\nCell 1 Service rated MCC 219A-LH-MCC-001 480V, 3-4, 3-wire, 4-wire\nCell 2 Service rated MCC 219E-LH-MCC-001 480V, 3-4, 3-wire, 4-wire\n1 The service-rated MCC will operate as a main service gear, power distribution center, and motor control\n2 assembly. A MCC distributes 480 volt, 3-phase power to the following 3-phase equipment:\n3 * LCRS three-phase pump motors\n4 * LDS three-phase pump motor\n5 * Combine sump three-phase pump motor\n6 * Crest pad building and leachate transfer building unit heaters\n7 * Crest pad and leachate transfer lighting panel transformers\n8 Secondary 3-phase power is monitored by phase loss and phase reversal protection relays mounted inside\n9 MCC(s). In the event of a phase loss or phase reversal condition, the protection relay will shunt the MCC\n10 main service breaker. With main service breaker shunted (open), a UPS mounted inside each PICS main\n11 control panel will continue the operation of voltage sensitive PICS equipment (i.e., PLC, OIU, local area\n12 network communication), allowing for future remote alarming (future SCADA) and the safe shutdown of\n13 sensitive equipment.\n14 Incoming power is also monitored through the use of analog-style voltage and current meters. Operators\n15 will be able to observe operating status of incoming power by manually selecting analog-style voltage and\n16 current meters to Phase A, Phase B, and Phase C.\n17 MCC associated gear (frame, bussing, and feeder protective devices) were sized to adequately and safely\n18 handle the calculated design and demand operating loads, and to safely withstand calculated short circuit\n19 interrupting currents.\n20 6.7.6 Utilization Voltages\n21 The electrical design identified utilization voltages for the following equipment and systems:\nEquipment or System Voltage, Phase\nLighting 120 V, 1-4\nHeat trace 120 V, 1-4\nConvenience outlets 120 V, 1-4\nInstrumentation control circuits 24 V DC\nMotor control 120 V, 1-4\nAir conditioner 208 V, 1-4\nMotors, less than 1/3 hp 120 V, 1-4\nMotors, 1/3 hp and larger 480 V, 3-4\nUnit heaters 480 V, 3-4\nInstrument power 120V, 1-4\n22 6.7.7 Leachate Transfer Building Electrical Service\n23 The electrical design identified three phase motor loads inside leachate transfer buildings as being\n24 powered from MCC, located inside each crest pad building. Power will be routed from MCC to service-\n25 rated disconnect, wire-way, enclosed breaker, and mini-power center (panel/transformer assembly),\n26 located inside each leachate transfer building.\nType Designation Configuration\nCell 1 service-rated disconnect 219Al-LH-SW-002 480V, 3-4, 3-wire, 4-wire\nCell 2 service-rated disconnect 219El-LH-SW-002 480V, 3-4, 3-wire, 4-wire\nAppendix 4A. 1.100\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 6.7.8 Crest Pad and Leachate Transfer Building Lighting Panelboards\n2 The electrical design identified lighting panel boards installed in each IDF facility to provide 120/208V\n3 3- , 4-wire power to non-three-phase motor loads. Lighting panelboards will be fed from 480V-\n4 120/208V 3-, 4-wire step-down transformers. Lighting panelboards inside crest pad buildings will be\n5 mounted along with step-down transformers inside MCC. Lighting panelboards (mini-power centers,\n6 along with integral step-down transformers) inside leachate transfer buildings will be wall mounted.\nType Designation Configuration\nCell I crest pad building lighting panel 219A- LH-LP-001 120/208V, 3- , 4-wire\nCell 1 crest pad building lighting panel 219E- LH-LP-001 120/208V, 3- , 4-wire\nCell 1 leachate transfer building lighting panel 219Al- LH-LP-002 120/208V, 3- , 4-wire\nCell 2 leachate transfer building lighting panel 219E1- LH-LP-002 120/208V, 3- , 4-wire\n7 Lighting distribution panelboards will provide 120 volt power to all single-phase equipment including:\n8 * Building lighting\n9 0 Emergency lighting\n10 * Receptacles\n11 * Main control panel\n12 * Instrumentation will be powered from surge-protected circuit breakers inside each crest pad\n13 building main control panel.\n14 * Lighting distribution panelboards will provide 120/208 volt, single and three-phase power to\n15 equipment including the building air conditioner, and heat tracing for process piping.\n16 6.7.9 Feeder and Branch Circuits\n17 The electrical design identified feeder and branch circuit breakers and conductor's size, based upon\n18 connected and operating loads. Style of feeder and branch circuit breakers will be thermal-magnetic.\n19 6.7.10 Raceways\n20 480V power circuits-Standard rigid galvanized steel (RGS) in exposed locations, PVC conduit systems\n21 will be buried, RGS will be coated when conduits transition from below grade to above grade areas\n22 120V power circuits-Standard RGS in exposed locations, PVC conduit systems buried, RGS coated\n23 when conduits transition from below grade to above grade areas.\n24 6.7.11 Raceway Sizing, Selection, and Installation Guidelines\n25 The electrical design identified conduit wire fill and size, based upon THW (thermoplastic, vinyl\n26 insulated building wire; flame retardant, moisture and heat resistant, 750C, dry and wet locations)\n27 insulated conductors for wiring 600 volts and below. Minimum raceway sizes will be as follows in the\n28 designated locations:\nMinimum Raceway Size: Location:\n3/4-inch Exposed on walls and ceiling\n3/4-inch Concealed in frame construction and finished ceilings\n1-inch Underground for circuits below 600 volts, including instrumentation\n3-inch Fiber optic\n29 The electrical design identified underground raceways assemblies as concrete duct bank constructed.\n30 6.7.12 Wire and Cable\n31 The electrical design identified stranded copper conductors that will be used for all wiring, except for\n32 lighting and receptacle circuits where solid copper will be used.\nAppendix 4A.1.101\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Minimum conductor size of No. 12 will be used for power and lighting branch circuits. Conductors\n2 installed in all branch circuits rated 100 amps or less was sized based upon NEC table for 600C TW\n3 conductors.\n4 * No. 12 AWG copper for lighting and receptacle branch circuits\n5 * No. 10 AWG, minimum, wiring for all outdoor power circuits\n6 * No. 14 AWG, minimum, for all instrumentation 24VDC discrete control and instrument power\n7 * No. 16 AWG, minimum, shielded for all instrumentation 24VDC analog control\n8 6.7.13 Convenience Receptacles\n9 The electrical design identified weatherproof 20 amp duplex receptacles for indoor service, weatherproof\n10 GFCI 20 amp duplex receptacles for outdoor service.\n11 6.7.14 Motor Control\n12 The electrical design identified full voltage non-reversing (FVNR) combination motor starter assemblies,\n13 to be mounted inside MCC for each constant speed motor. FVNR combination motor starter assemblies\n14 will consist of thermal-magnetic, trip-molded case circuit breakers; full voltage combination starters;\n15 control power transformers; indicating lights; and control switches. All combination motor starters will\n16 be operated in AUTO mode by PICS.\n17 6.7.15 Overload Protection\n18 The electrical design identified each motor as being provided with thermal overload protection in all\n19 ungrounded phases. Each controller will be provided with overload heaters and controller-mounted relays\n20 with external manual reset.\n21 6.7.16 Grounding\n22 The electrical design identified the grounding electrode system for each IDF facility, integrating ground\n23 ring rods, and connection to building rebar. The electrical design identified electrical service neutral, and\n24 the neutrals of derived sources, electrical equipment, and PICS control panels that will be bonded to\n25 grounding electrode systems.\n26 6.7.17 Equipment Grounding\n27 The electrical design identified noncurrent-carrying parts of all electrical equipment, devices,\n28 panelboards, and metallic raceways that will be bonded to grounding system.\n29 The electrical design identified noncurrent-carrying parts of all mechanical equipment, to which electrical\n30 components will be attached and may potentially become energized, that also will be bonded to the\n31 grounding system, including building metal structures and leachate storage tank.\n32 All conduits that will be provided have an equipment grounding conductor.\n33 6.7.18 Lighting\n34 The electrical design identified lighting fixtures that will be installed at each IDF facility to maintain an\n35 average 25-foot candle inside each building, and 5-foot candles at entrance doorways.\n36 Note: Interior lighting levels are based upon IES Lighting Handbook Indoor Industrial Areas\n37 Recommended Illuminance Levels for interior activities inside work spaces where visual tasks of medium\n38 to large contrast are to be performed on occasional basis.\n39 Note: Exterior entrance lighting levels are based upon IES Lighting Handbook Outdoor Site/Area\n40 Recommended Illuminance Levels for building exterior entrances frequently visited locations.\n41 6.7.19 Emergency Lighting System\n42 The electrical design identified emergency illumination (battery-pack wall-mounted units or luminaries\n43 powered by integral battery-powered ballasts) that will be provided in all IDF facilities.\nAppendix 4A.1.102\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 6.7.20 Circuiting and Switching\n2 The electrical design identified interior process area lighting, switched to provide adequate lighting.\n3 Exterior building lighting will be controlled by photocells.\n4 6.7.21 Heat Trace\n5 The electrical design identified electrical heat trace for above grade process piping freeze protection.\n6 Heat trace cable will be the self-limiting type with the overall system controlled by an ambient control\n7 thermostat. Heat trace design incorporates circuit power indication.\n8 6.7.22 Hazardous Classification\n9 The electrical design identified the interior of the combined sump as Class 1, Division 2 group,\n10 C hazardous. The electrical design for the combined sump will incorporate materials and intrinsic safety\n11 devices compatible for the installation of electrical equipment in Class 1, Division 2, Group C hazardous\n12 locations.\n13 6.8 Construction QA Requirements\n14 The Construction QA Plan describes the QA activities for constructing the Phase I IDF. QA activities\n15 will be required during construction to ensure the following:\n16 * Firm and stable foundation system for liners\n17 * Stability of dikes or embankments\n18 * Low permeability soil liners that inhibit contaminant migration\n19 * Geosynthetic layers that function as either a hydraulic barrier or a drainage system, depending on\n20 intended function\n21 * LCRS and LDS that remove leachate and control head on the lining systems\n22 * The Construction QA Plan has been prepared to describe the activities that will be performed\n23 during construction of the lining system, leachate collection system, and operation layer of Cell 1\n24 and Cell 2. The Construction QA Plan satisfies the regulatory requirements and guidance\n25 established in 40 CFR 264.19, the EPA technical guidance document, Quality Assurance and\n26 Quality Control for Waste Containment Facilities (EPA 1993), and WAC 173-303-335.\n27 The specific physical components that the WAC requires the Construction QA Plan to address include:\n28 * Foundations\n29 * Dikes\n30 * Low-permeability soil liners\n31 * Geomembranes\n32 * LCRS and LDS\n33 * Final cover systems\n34 * The WAC requires the Construction QA Plan to include the following:\n35 * Identification of applicable units and how they will be constructed\n36 * Identification of key personnel\n37 * Description of inspection and sampling activities\n38 The Construction QA Plan is intended to be implemented by an independent, qualified Construction QA\n39 certifying engineer, familiar with EPA's technical guidance document, Quality Assurance and Quality\n40 Control for Waste Containment Facilities, as well as the Construction QA Plan. The Construction QA\n41 certifying engineer will be supported by other Construction QA representatives, as necessary, to\n42 implement the requirements in the Construction QA Plan and document the work.\nAppendix 4A.1.103\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The Construction QA Plan establishes general administrative and documentation procedures that will be\n2 applicable for selected activities of construction. The Construction QA Plan addresses only those\n3 activities associated with the soils, geosynthetics, and related liner and leachate collection system piping\n4 components for the Phase I IDF landfill. Other aspects of construction, such as transmission piping,\n5 utilities, concrete, and storage tanks will require QA testing and oversight. These requirements are not\n6 mentioned in the Construction QA Plan, but they will be included in future construction inspection\n7 documents, accompanying the bid-ready drawings and specifications.\n8 6.9 Interface with Non-Critical Systems\n9 Critical systems for the Phase I IDF include three primary design components:\n10 * Liner systems\n11 * LCRS\n12 * LDS\n13 In addition, the Phase I IDF detailed design also involves completing all design work required for an\n14 operable landfill.\n15 Non-critical systems for the Phase I IDF include the following components:\n16 * Entrance facilities, including entrance area, scales, and staging areas\n17 * Administration and control facilities\n18 * Waste delivery access road improvements to the IDF site from the WTP\n19 * Waste treatment and staging areas\n20 * Gates and fences\n21 * Utilities including fire protection, process water, electrical power, or instrumentation cables\n22 The IDF Phase I Critical Systems design has been prepared to interface with these non-critical systems\n23 that are necessary for operational readiness for the IDF. The following discussion details interface\n24 elements of the current design with these non-critical systems.\n25 There is the potential for the DOE to procure an independent contractor to provide operation and\n26 maintenance services for the IDF. These services could also include the detailed design and construction\n27 of a portion or all of the non-critical systems for the facility. If this should be the case, careful\n28 consideration will be given to these interface elements in the development of performance criteria that\n29 will be included as part of any contract package for these services.\n30 6.9.1 Entrance Facilities\n31 Entrance facilities will control the flow of waste into the IDF. These facilities will provide for waste\n32 delivery, inspection, check-in, and final authorization for disposal into the IDF. Typically, the location\n33 for the entrance facilities is adjacent to the in-bound access road, prior to reaching the disposal area.\n34 Other factors that can influence their location include access to existing utilities and other operational\n35 facilities such as waste treatment, soil stockpiles, or staging areas. Based on the current configuration\n36 planned for the IDF, there will be room for entrance facilities to the south of the Phase I disposal area,\n37 along the western access road. Typically, these facilities require connection to such utilities as fire\n38 protection, power, and process water. Utility interfaces are discussed later in this section.\n39 Design criteria and detailed design elements for the IDF entrance facilities have not been developed. The\n40 overall mission for the facility has expanded from handling just the ILAW packages to other wastes\n41 including Waste from the DBVS and LLW materials. This may require the entrance facilities to have\n42 expanded capabilities for waste load staging, inspection, verification, and scaling, prior to release for\n43 disposal into the IDF. This could impact the location selected for the entrance facilities, since complete\n44 development of the IDF to its full capacity will leave little room to the south of the southern perimeter\n45 berm for the facility (refer to Drawing H-2-830827).\nAppendix 4A.1.104\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 This could require the entrance facilities to be located along 1st Street, if a permanent initial location is\n2 desired. Otherwise, a more mobile entrance area could be developed and relocated along with phased\n3 development of the facility.\n4 6.9.2 Administration and Control Facilities\n5 Administration and control facilities will provide the control center for LCRS operations and monitoring,\n6 as well as monitoring for LDS and other emergency systems (fire, power interruption, and HVAC\n7 controls). The administration building will service facility operations, including waste tracking and\n8 record keeping systems as well as provide for staff needs including office facilities, lunch room, lockers,\n9 and storage. Other functions that may take place in this facility area include equipment maintenance, an\n10 equipment and staff decontamination area, and equipment storage.\n11 The proposed location of the administration building is shown on Drawing H-2-830827, to the north of\n12 the leachate storage and handling area (north of the IDF Phase I development area). This location\n13 provides quick access to the leachate control buildings and storage tanks, as well as good interface with\n14 existing utilities that will come from existing facilities to the east and west of the IDF. Power and\n15 control/communications cables will connect the administration building to the leachate control buildings\n16 (crest pad buildings, leachate pump buildings, and leachate storage tanks), as well as to other leachate\n17 control structures including the combine manholes and truck loading stations for Cell I and Cell 2.\n18 Additional utilities will service the administration building including fire protection, process water,\n19 potable water, communications, and power. Calculations for power supply to future facilities are\n20 provided in the Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF) Detailed Design: Site Utilities Design Report,\n21 (RPP-18515, Revision 1).\n22 Design criteria and detailed design need to be established for the administration building. The expanded\n23 mission of the IDF may influence existing criteria that have already been determined for this facility as\n24 provided in conceptual design documents for the original ILAW W-520 Project. Modular units may be\n25 considered for this facility.\n26 6.9.3 Waste Delivery Access Road\n27 The waste delivery from the WTP will access the IDF from 1st Street and enter the IDF along the western\n28 perimeter of the landfill. Waste delivery from other areas will access the facility from one of three gates\n29 (810, 812, or 815) to the 200 East Area, as discussed previously in Section 1 (refer to Figure 1-3).\n30 The Phase I access road is aligned horizontally with the proposed western berm of the complete IDF\n31 landfill. The vertical alignment of Phase I access road coordinates with the existing topography of the site\n32 between 1st Street and the Phase I landfill area, to minimize cut and fill requirements for this road\n33 construction. As such, the Phase I vertical alignment does not follow the vertical alignment of the future\n34 western perimeter berm of the landfill and will need to be modified in future expansion phases.\n35 All-weather pavement for the Phase I road as well as for 1st Street will need to be completed as part of\n36 non-critical design. It is anticipated that pavement will be asphalt concrete pavement.\n37 Access for waste haul vehicles will require upgrades to 1st Street to be designed as part of non-critical\n38 systems. Design criteria for this upgrade will be based on the anticipated haul vehicles and wheel loads\n39 for the various wastes to brought to the facility. From the Phase I Critical Systems design, the melter\n40 transport vehicle represents the most restrictive design condition for the road in terms of axle load and\n41 radius/grade limitations. However, there are also substantial wheel loads and larger volumes for ILAW\n42 package transport vehicles and other MLW and LLW wastes.\n43 It should be noted that there will be a significant grade differential between the southern end of the IDF\n44 perimeter berm and the existing 1st Street road grade. The western berm climbs at a uniform 1 percent\n45 grade to the south. As such, it will have an elevation of approximately 741 feet at the southern perimeter\n46 road. The existing grade of 1st Street at the western perimeter of the IDF is approximately 734 feet, and\n47 so 1st Street will need to be raised to make this transition and keep vertical road grades at a maximum of\n48 5 percent to accommodate the melter transport vehicles.\nAppendix 4A.1.105\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 6.9.4 Waste Treatment and Staging\n2 Currently, no waste treatment facilities have been planned for the IDF. Consideration of waste treatment\n3 may be necessary as part of the IDF's expanded mission to take mixed wastes and low-level wastes from\n4 both onsite and offsite sources, depending on the waste acceptance criteria that are established for the\n5 facility. Waste staging areas are associated with waste receipt and inspection activities, as mentioned\n6 previously. Staging and storage areas may also be needed for waste treatment as well. Design of non-\n7 critical facilities may need to consider development of these waste treatment and staging areas.\n8 During Phase I operation, there is adequate area south of the Phase I landfill area for treatment and\n9 staging. Some staging also can occur within the landfill itself that offers the advantage of occurring over\n10 lined areas with leachate collection systems in place. However, as wastes are placed and cell lifts become\n11 full, staging areas may be limited until new lifts are ready for waste placement. Regulatory requirements\n12 for waste staging and storage may also impact location and operational requirements for these areas.\n13 6.9.5 Gates and Fences\n14 The IDF is being developed within the 200 East area of the Hanford Site, that has controlled access with a\n15 perimeter fence and access control gates (refer to Figure 1-1). As such, it is currently not anticipated that\n16 additional fencing and gates will be required for access control to the facility. However, operationally it\n17 may be determined that a perimeter fence and additional gates may be warranted for isolation of the IDF\n18 from adjacent existing facilities and, if so, these need to be designed during implementation of non-\n19 critical design components. Site standards for fences and gates would be followed for this design.\n20 6.9.6 Site Utilities\n21 As mentioned previously, site utilities are included in non-critical systems design. Site utilities will\n22 interface with existing utilities that service facilities in the 200 East area. As such, substantial\n23 coordination will be required to locate these utilities, determine the best interface tie-in location, and\n24 bring these to the IDF site. Key utilities that are needed for the IDF include:\n25 * Power to buildings and operating systems, as well as to area lighting\n26 * Communication between administration building and operating systems, as well as from the IDF\n27 to other area networks\n28 * Fire protection water\n29 * Process (non-potable) water for operations and facility construction\n30 * Potable water\n31 Power requirements for leachate control and monitoring systems have been designed during this Phase I\n32 Critical Systems design. Access vaults to power and control systems are provided outside of both crest\n33 pad buildings (shown on Drawing H-2-830858). It is anticipated that the administration building will\n34 connect at these access vaults and will provide power for system operation and an Ethernet connection for\n35 controls. Transformer design for bringing power from the site to the administration building (and to\n36 leachate control facilities) will be performed during non-critical design, as will design of the Ethernet\n37 connection and administration control systems. Calculations for power supply to future facilities are\n38 provided in the Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF) Detailed Design: Site Utilities Design Report,\n39 (RPP-18515, Revision 1).\n40 Utility corridors need to be developed to bring these utilities to facility areas. It is recommended that\n41 these corridors be developed outside of landfill embankment areas and access roads, to allow for\n42 uninterrupted waste placement and facility operation, for future landfill phase development, for protection\n43 of liner system anchor trenches, and for protection of utilities from heavy wheel loads. In addition, the\n44 future final cover of the IDF is located over the perimeter embankments and catches existing ground at\n45 the outside toe of the embankment.\nAppendix 4A.1.106\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 7.0 OPERATING PROVISIONS\n2 7.1 Waste Placement\n3 7.1.1 Introduction\n4 To establish a baseline for design, construction, and operation of the IDF, a plan for filling the landfill\n5 cells was developed. This plan was developed mainly to ensure that landfill configuration and size as\n6 proposed for the IDF Phase I Critical Systems were adequate for safe placement of the ILAW, waste from\n7 the DBVS, and LLW, both remote handle and contact handle, that will be placed in the Phase I\n8 development. The proposed configuration and size of the IDF Phase I landfill are identified in Section 6\n9 of this report.\n10 The drawings that show the waste placement plan are included in Appendix D. 1. This plan was based on\n11 the concept of completely filling the first lift in both cells before beginning filling of the succeeding lift.\n12 The plan represents one approach to filling the cells within the proposed configuration. It is possible that\n13 other approaches, such as proceeding to a subsequent lift before completely filling the previous lift, also\n14 are workable, but development of the plan did not consider alternative methodologies to fill the cells.\n15 Development of the plan is also based on conformance with the operational procedures identified for the\n16 Base Alternative in Appendix K of the Conceptual Design Report for Immobilized Low-Activity Waste\n17 Disposal Facility, Project W-520 (RPP-7908, Revision 0), (CDR).\n18 This waste placement plan is intended to meet the applicable functional criteria identified in the System\n19 Specification for Immobilized Low-Activity Waste Disposal System (RPP-7303, Revision 3). \"As low as\n20 reasonably achievable\" principals (keeping radiation exposures to as low as reasonably achievable) are\n21 embodied in the waste placement plan that was developed. Because of the area available for waste\n22 disposal in each cell, the plan provides the capability to relocate filling operations to another area within\n23 each cell, if an event occurs that causes operations to halt temporarily, placing waste packages at the\n24 current working position. This will allow waste package placement to continue while the situation that\n25 caused the operations to cease is resolved.\n26 7.1.2 Phase I Configuration\n27 Under the proposed configuration for the IDF Phase I, there will be two cells, identical in size. One cell\n28 will be for disposal of ILAW and waste from the DBVS; the other cell will be for disposal of LLW. This\n29 waste placement plan proposes disposal of ILAW and DBVS waste Cell I and disposal of LLW in Cell 2.\n30 Provisions are included for disposal of both remote handle and contact handle waste in each cell.\n31 The configuration of the IDF Phase I development as it will exist at the completion of construction, prior\n32 to beginning filling operations, is shown in Appendix D, Drawing D.1-1. The initial operations layer,\n33 placed as part of Phase I construction, will cover the entire bottom liner and LCRS. The top of the\n34 operations layer will be level in the east-west direction and slope down at 1 percent from the south to the\n35 north. The operations layer will extend up the west, north, and east side slopes. Access to the facility will\n36 be from 1st Street along the western site boundary. An access ramp from the southwest corner of Phase I\n37 will lead down the south excavation slope from the west side to the bottom of Phase I and connect to the\n38 top of the operations layer near the south east corner of Cell 2.\n39 7.1.3 Waste Receipts\n40 As stated in Section 6.2, the IDF will receive LAW and Waste from the DBVS. The volumes stated in\n41 Section 6.2 are based on waste forecast information provided by FH. The waste volume forecasts are\n42 updated by Hanford Site contractors on a regular basis. Actual waste receipt rates at the IDF will likely\n43 vary from the estimated amounts. Depending on the receipt rate of LAW and DBVS waste versus the\n44 receipt rate of LLW, each lift of Cell 1 and Cell 2 may fill at different rates. The waste placement plan\n45 can accommodate differing rates of waste receipt because filling in subsequent lifts in each cell could be\n46 begun at different times as soon as the prior lift was complete. The cell that has the higher waste receipt\n47 rate will fill faster than the other cell and will determine the time when subsequent phases of development\n48 will need to begin so that additional disposal capacity is available when it is needed.\nAppendix 4A.1.107\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 7.1.4 General Waste Placement Procedures\n2 The discussion of waste placement in this plan is based on placement of the uniform height ILAW\n3 packages using remote handle. Some adjustments may need to be made for the variable height LLW\n4 containers and for contact handle waste, but in general, the waste placement concept will be the same for\n5 all types of waste.\n6 The configuration of IDF Phase I provides a height sufficient for four layers of ILAW packages, each\n7 covered with one meter of operations layer soil to provide shielding to operations personnel during waste\n8 package placement. LLW, which will be in variable height containers, can be accommodated within each\n9 of these four lifts. However, in some cases the LLW containers may exceed the lift height and, therefore,\n10 will not be completely covered by placement of the operations layer soil. In these cases, it may be\n11 necessary to mound cover soil around the individual projecting LLW containers to provide sufficient\n12 cover for shielding until they are completely covered by subsequent lifts.\n13 Each lift will contain multiple ILAW package arrays that span the width of each cell. The packages will\n14 be placed in close-packet hexagonal arrays, with placement tolerance averaging 10 centimeters (4 inches)\n15 center to center. As the packages are placed in the cell, the array will proceed along the width of the cell.\n16 The earth cover will proceed shortly behind the advancing package array, the distance behind the front\n17 package limited by the repose slope of the fill soil. The array width (number of columns of packages)\n18 will be limited according to the amount of radiation generated by the total number of packages that can be\n19 exposed. The CDR indicates that even at some distance from the advancing array, the dose rate becomes\n20 a concern when the array approaches more than ten or twelve packages in width.\n21 Off-loading of the ILAW packages and other waste containers will take place in the cell. A standard,\n22 manually operated, rubber-tired crane will off-load packages, move temporary shielding walls (concrete\n23 blocks), and place the interstitial fill between the packages using a hopper. In the CDR, the total weight\n24 of the shielding bell, package grapple, load cell, hooks, and other rigging is estimated at 20 metric tons\n25 (23 tons). The crane, as identified in the CDR, will be a Grove GMK 5100, a 108 metric ton (120 ton),\n26 rough terrain rubber-tired crane with a telescoping boom and a maximum reach of 15 meters (50 feet),\n27 with a load of 20 metric tons (23 tons). Pad loads could exceed 55 metric tons (60 tons) when placing an\n28 ILAW package at the maximum allowable reach. Dunnage required under each outrigger pad of the\n29 crane for lifts of this size has been determined to be 60 square feet, when operating directly on the base\n30 operations layer at its point of minimum thickness over the bottom liner system. Dunnage requirements\n31 for subsequent lifts would be less, but have not been determined. Refer to Section 5.5.5 and Appendix\n32 C.5.e of this Design Report for dunnage requirement calculations.\n33 7.1.5 Moveable Shielding Wall\n34 With off-loading operations in close proximity to the advancing package array, a moveable shielding wall\n35 will be set up between the crane and transporter operations and the placed packages (CDR, Drawing No.\n36 ES-W520-BASE). With the 15-meter (50-foot) maximum reach of the crane, the shield walls will have to\n37 be moved after every five rows of packages are placed. For a ten-package-wide-array, the wall will need\n38 to be relocated after fifty packages have been deposited, or about every eight days during Phase 1.\n39 To prevent the crane crew from receiving a high exposure rate, a new shield wall will be erected before\n40 the first shield wall is removed. A remote grappling system will be required to prevent rigging of the\n41 previously placed shield wall from causing high dose rates to operations personnel. Even then, the\n42 amount of time it will take to move the wall is estimated in the CDR to be 26 hours, four to five shifts, or\n43 a little less than two days when operating a full 24 hours per day.\n44 An alternative to the movable shielding wall is to use contact handle waste to construct the shielding wall\n45 and to leave it in place after placement of each ILAW array rather than moving it. This can reduce\n46 operations labor and expenses. It can also result in the use of less cover soil because the space between\n47 the package arrays will be partly filled with contact handle waste, rather than with all soil.\nAppendix 4A.1.108\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI This alternative needs to be considered further when developing the operations plan for operating the\n2 disposal facility.\n3 7.1.6 Typical Array Size\n4 The moveable shielding wall set up between the crane and transporter operations and the placed package\n5 configuration will limit the proximity of package placement to between 15 meters (50 feet) and 7.5 meters\n6 (25 feet) of the crane. The 7.5 meters (25 feet) usable range of the crane reach, working over the\n7 shielding wall, and the ten or twelve maximum package width (because of dose rate limitation)\n8 determines the nominal array size that can be placed by the crane from a single set point. The 1.22 meters\n9 (4 feet) diameter ILAW packages will be staggered in the array to minimize the space between the\n10 packages. A column that is five packages deep can fit within the 7.5 meters (25 feet) available range of\n11 the crane reach while working over the shield wall. A width of ten packages is within the reach of the\n12 crane and is less than the allowable limits for the dose rate. Allowing for a 10 centimeters (4 inches)\n13 average tolerance in package placement, the five-row by ten-package-wide array is roughly 6 meters\n14 (20 feet) deep by 13.3 meters (44 feet) wide. A typical array is shown in Appendix D, Drawing D.1-1.\n15 7.1.7 Cover Soil\n16 Prior to the shield wall being relocated, the crane will place interstitial soil material between the packages,\n17 using a hopper. The filling operation is expected to take about one shift, according to the CDR, using up\n18 the balance of the two days needed to move the shield wall. To make up the time spent moving the shield\n19 wall and placing the interstitial fill soil, the average rate of package placement will have to be increased to\n20 seven packages per day for five days, according to the CDR.\n21 While the shield wall is being relocated, a soil cover will be placed over the packages from on top of the\n22 lift of previously placed packages. Dump trucks will drive over the previously covered portion of the\n23 array and back up to near the edge of the packages that are still exposed and dump a load of fill soil for\n24 spreading by a bulldozer. The soil will be spread over the top of the top and exposed side of the array.\n25 The side slope from soil, cascading off the top, will be formed in no less than 1.5 H: 1V for reasons of\n26 safety, and will use approximately a 5-meter (16-foot) wide space between lines of arrays.\n27 Approximately 300 cubic meters (400 cubic yards) of soil will be required to cover the top and side of the\n28 five-row-deep by ten-package-wide array. The cover soil will be held back from the advancing end of the\n29 array so that the toe of the cover soil does not extend beyond the outer package in the array. This will\n30 allow the next array to be placed in close proximity to the previous array. After the bulldozer spreads the\n31 soil to a somewhat uniform 1-meter-plus thickness over the packages, a sheepsfoot-style compactor will\n32 make several passes to consolidate the fill soil. The cover soil effort will take approximately 12 hours or\n33 two shifts, as estimated in the CDR, and will take place at the same time that the portable shield wall is\n34 being relocated.\n35 7.1.8 Failed Melter Disposal Area\n36 (Note: Disposal of failed melters is not permitted at this time by this permit.)\n37\n38 Failed melters can be disposed of as MLLW in Cell 1. A failed melter disposal area is provided on the\n39 bottom of Cell I at the southern toe of the waste lifts. Disposing of the failed melters in this area would\n40 eliminate placing them within the lifts along with the ILAW packages and other MLLW.\n41 7.1.9 Access Ramps\n42 Two 30-foot wide access ramps will be built into the south slope of the waste lifts to accommodate the\n43 movement of transport vehicles and equipment from one lift to the next. A third access ramp will be built\n44 through the north shine berm onto the top of the third lift to accommodate transport vehicles and\n45 equipment during the construction of Phase II, when the access ramp leading down the south excavation\n46 slope to the bottom of Phase I will be removed.\n47\nAppendix 4A.1.109\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The access ramp into Cell I and the access ramp from the north side would have a maximum slope of 5\n2 percent to accommodate failed melter transporters, if it becomes necessary to dispose of the melters in the\n3 waste lifts rather than in the designated area at the bottom of Cell 1. The access ramp into Cell 2 would\n4 have a maximum slope of 8 percent that would accommodate the ILAW, DBVS containers, and LLW\n5 waste transporters. The access ramps at the bottom of Phase I would have minimum outside turning radii\n6 of 75 feet, to accommodate the failed melter transporters. The dimensions of the access ramps provide\n7 flexibility to accommodate the various waste haul vehicles that could use the ramps.\n8 7.1.10 Filling Lift 1\n9 Filling of remote handle ILAW and DBVS waste in Cell I will begin in the northwest corner and proceed\n10 to the southeast. Filling of remote handle LLW in Cell 2 will begin in the northeast corner and proceed to\n11 the southwest. Filling of contact handle LLW will begin in the northwest corner of cell 2 and proceed\n12 southeast (see Appendix D, Drawing D.1-2). This filling approach places the remote handle wastes\n13 farthest apart from each other, with contact handle wastes between them, and eliminates the need for\n14 additional shielding provisions that would be necessary if the two remote handles wastes were located\n15 adjacent to each other. This filling approach will be continued in the three subsequent lifts.\n16 Nearly all of Lift I can be filled with the crane and transporters, operating from the top of the first\n17 operations layer. A 5-meter (17-foot) wide separation will be maintained between Cell 1 and Cell 2 to\n18 separate the ILAW and DBVS waste from the LLW. This separation area will be filled with soil. Using a\n19 low permeability soil in this area will maximize separation of leachate between the two cells. Two access\n20 lanes (ramps) will be maintained into the cells for transporter access. The transporters can turn around\n21 within the cells until the packages are within 7.5 meters (25 feet) of the area needed for the unloading\n22 operations.\n23 Before the space for filling Lift I from the top of the first operations layer is consumed, the two access\n24 ramps will be extended with soil and contact handle waste to the top of Lift 1. The crane and transporters\n25 will go to the top of Lift I and will finish placing the remainder of the Lift I waste packages from the top\n26 (see Appendix D, Drawing D.1-3). At this point, it will also be possible to begin using the failed melter\n27 disposal area (also shown on Drawing D. 1-3).\n28 7.1.11 Filling Lift 2\n29 Lift 2 will be filled similarly to Lift I (see Appendix D, Drawing D.1-4). This filling approach will\n30 continue the pattern that was established in Lift 1. Nearly the entire lift can be filled with the crane and\n31 transporters operating on the top of Lift 1. The 5-meter (17-foot) wide soil-filled separation will be\n32 maintained between Cell I and Cell 2 to separate the ILAW and DBVS waste from the LLW. The two\n33 access ramps will be maintained into both cells for transporter access. The transporters can turn around\n34 within the cells until the packages are within 7.5 meters (25 feet) of the area needed for the unloading\n35 operations. Before the space for filling Lift 2 from the top of Lift 1 is consumed, the two access ramps\n36 will be extended with soil and contact handle waste to the top of Lift 2. The crane and transporters will\n37 go to the top of Lift 2 and will finish placing the remainder of the Lift 2 waste packages from the top (see\n38 Appendix D, Drawing D.1-5).\n39 7.1.12 Filling Lift 3\n40 Lift 3 will be filled similarly to Lift 2 (see Appendix D, Drawing D.1-6). Nearly the entire lift can be\n41 filled with the crane and transporters operating on the top of Lift 2. The 5-meter (17-foot) wide soil-filled\n42 separation will be maintained between Cell I and Cell 2 to separate the ILAW and DBVS waste from the\n43 LLW. Two access ramps will be extended into the cells for transporter access. The transporters can turn\n44 around within the cells until the packages are within 7.5 meters (25 feet) of the area needed for the\n45 unloading operations. Before the space for filling Lift 3 from the top of Lift 2 is consumed, the two\n46 access ramps will be extended with soil and contact handle waste to the top of Lift 3. The crane and\n47 transporters will go to the top of Lift 3 and will finish placing the remainder of the Lift 3 waste packages\n48 from the top (see Appendix D, Drawing D. 1-7).\nAppendix 4A.1.110\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 7.1.13 Filling Lift 4\n2 Lift 4 will be filled similarly to the previous three lifts, but with a few differences (see Appendix D,\n3 Drawing D.1-8). Most of the lift can be filled with the crane and transporters operating on the top of Lift\n4 3, using the access ramps from the south. However, only the easterly access ramp from the south is\n5 planned to be extended to the top of Lift 4 for transporter access. The westerly access ramp from the\n6 south will not be extended because, as shown on Appendix D, Drawing D. 1-9, it would reach the top of\n7 Lift 4 too close to the west side slope to accommodate an adequate turning radius for the transport\n8 vehicles. The access ramp will be blocked by waste placement in Cell 1. However, with some minor\n9 adjustment in its location and/or increase in its slope, it will be possible to extend the access ramp into\n10 Cell 1, if desired. Also, at some point during the filling Lift 4, construction for Phase II to the south will\n11 begin, and the access road from the south will be removed from service.\n12 Prior to the westerly access ramp becoming blocked with waste and the access road from the south\n13 removed for construction of Phase II, a third access ramp will be constructed from the north down onto\n14 the top of Lift 3 to provide additional access. This access ramp will maintain separation between Cell 1\n15 and Cell 2, to separate the ILAW and DBVS waste from the LLW. The transporters can turn around\n16 within the cells until the packages are within 7.5 meters (25 feet) of the area needed for the unloading\n17 operations.\n18 Before the space for filling Lift 4 from the top of Lift 3 is consumed, the easterly access ramp will be\n19 extended with soil and contact handle waste to the top of Lift 4, and the access ramp from the north will\n20 be graded out onto the top of Lift 4. The crane and transporters will go to the top of Lift 4 and will finish\n21 placing the remainder of the Lift 4 waste packages from the top (see Appendix D, Drawing D.1-9).\n22 Completion of Lift 4 will end the filling operations in Phase I. The configuration at the end of Lift 4,\n23 prior to placement of the final cover system, is shown on Appendix D, Drawing D.1-10.\n24 7.1.14 Transitioning Between Lifts\n25 As the available operating space in a lift gets smaller, operations efficiency will decrease to a point where\n26 it will become necessary to move part of the operations to the next lift before the active lift is completed.\n27 This will allow completion of each lift, using selected waste that will be easier to handle in the remaining\n28 space available on the lift. An example of this would be to use only contact handle waste to complete the\n29 filling of each lift while operating on the top of the lift that is being completed (see Appendix D,\n30 Drawings D.1-3, -5, -7, and -9) and sending all remote handle waste into the next lift.\n31 7.1.15 Planning for Phase II and Operations During Phase II Construction\n32 Phase II will need to be constructed and ready for operations sufficiently ahead of completion of filling\n33 operations in Lift 4 of Phase I to allow a smooth transition without operational constraints. Planning,\n34 design, and construction of Phase II may require several years. Phase II should be planned to be ready for\n35 operation at least six months, and preferably one year or more, before Lift 4 in Phase I is anticipated to be\n36 completed. This will provide a reasonable margin for changes in the incoming waste quantities and other\n37 variables while still having Phase II ready for operation, prior to reaching capacity in Phase I.\n38 While Phase II is under construction, the access road on the west will be out of service for a period of\n39 time and the access ramp on the south into Phase I will be removed. During this time, it will be necessary\n40 for all waste transport vehicles to enter Phase I, using the access ramp on the north side. As currently\n41 designed, some access roads on the west and north sides of Phase I that normally would be used to reach\n42 the north access ramp might not accommodate all of the transport vehicles. In particular, the berm access\n43 road on the west side of Phase I and the access roads around the leachate storage tanks on the north do not\n44 have widths and turning radii as large as required by the waste transport vehicles. These roads would\n45 have to be widened and their turning radii increased to meet the requirements for transport vehicles,\n46 particularly the failed melter transporters.\nAppendix 4A. 1.111\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 7.2 Operational Interfaces\n2 Operations and maintenance procedures will be prepared in the future as a separate project. These\n3 procedures will address operations, monitoring, and maintenance activities for the IDF.\n4 This section of the Design Report presents important operational interfaces that have been identified by\n5 the design team. These interfaces should be considered during preparation of the operation and\n6 maintenance procedures. The interfaces are grouped by three categories-landfill excavation, liner system,\n7 and leachate handling system.\n8 7.2.1 IDF Landfill Excavation and Related Subsystems\n9 Operational interfaces for the landfill excavation and related subsystems include the following:\n10 * Due to the containerized nature of the waste, the landfill is designed to be filled in a bottom-up\n11 fashion in four or more layers. The number of layers will depend on waste package size. Some\n12 waste packages may be larger in dimension than the ILAW packages. Operational procedures\n13 should be developed to accommodate various package sizes and their placement.\n14 * Clean fill placement between waste packages must be done to minimize the potential for future\n15 consolidation and potential subsidence.\n16 * Operations layer on side slopes of IDF will be monitored for material loss due to wind and water\n17 erosion. Lost material should be replaced. Annual application of spray-on type soil stabilization\n18 material to exposed areas of Phase I IDF should be considered.\n19 * Shine berms should be monitored for erosion and height and should be repaired as necessary.\n20 Erosion control matting on the berm will be maintained and repaired or replaced if damage\n21 occurs.\n22 * Stormwater control facilities should be maintained annually. Maintenance would include debris\n23 removal from the ditches and application of weed control. Periodically, if capacity of infiltration\n24 areas is diminished due to collection of fines, fines removal will be necessary. To maintain\n25 infiltration capacity, no other vehicle access should be allowed into these areas.\n26 * Stormwater accumulation in the in-cell excavation infiltration area should be visually monitored.\n27 Pumping of the area may be necessary if accumulation becomes significant (near liner levels) in\n28 wet weather seasons. Periodically, if capacity of infiltration areas is diminished due to collection\n29 of fines, fines removal will be necessary. To maintain infiltration capacity, no other vehicle\n30 access should be allowed into these areas.\n31 * Due to the heavy wheel loads on the access roads and ramps, gravel surfacing will be maintained\n32 with regular maintenance. Maintenance activities may include addition of more top course\n33 material, and grading and compaction of this material.\n34 * Active faces of stockpiles will require periodic application of spray-on soil stabilization material.\n35 7.2.2 IDF Liner System\n36 Operational interfaces for the lining system include the following:\n37 * Only equipment with ground pressures less than 4,400 lb/ft should be used for construction and\n38 maintenance on the side slopes, when operating directly on the operations layer. Bulldozers or\n39 other equipment may operate on the side slopes until a rain event in excess of 0.15 inches per\n40 hour occurs. In that event, equipment should be kept off the side slope (directly on the operations\n41 layer) and should not be permitted to operate on slopes until two hours after the end of the rainfall\n42 event. The precipitation event applies to both the lined slopes and the unlined slopes at the\n43 southern end of the Phase I cell.\n44 * For equipment on ramps, equipment should be kept a minimum of 2 feet away from the edge of\n45 ramps, to avoid localized sloughing of the ramp edges.\nAppendix 4A.1.112\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * When operating equipment or placing waste on the operations layer above the lining system, care\n2 should be taken to avoid damaging the liner. Special care will be necessary for equipment\n3 operation on the side slopes.\n4 * Any loads placed on the surface of the first operations layer must be examined to verify that they\n5 do not create loads on the lining system in excess of the allowable GCL bearing capacity. As an\n6 example, different types of waste other than canisters should be examined as the waste plan is\n7 more fully developed. Care should also be taken to avoid impact loading, such as dropping a\n8 canister.\n9 * For static loading (such as for a barrier wall), refer to the discussion in Section 5.2 and\n10 Appendix C.2.\n11 * For operational/equipment loading, refer to the discussion in Section 5.5.5 and Appendix C.5.e to\n12 determine applicable load limits and crane dunnage requirements.\n13 The waste plan, as it is developed, should be followed for placement and density requirements. Any\n14 revisions to the proposed waste filling plan (discussed in Section 7.1) should be reviewed by the design\n15 engineer, to evaluate impacts on the waste/fill global stability analyses (Section 5.1.3 and\n16 Appendix C. 1.c).\n17 As part of the waste/fill global stability analyses, the waste mass was considered internally stable for this\n18 design effort. Internal waste mass stability is a function of the waste filling approach. There are\n19 numerous options available to stabilize the waste through operational methodologies, such as providing a\n20 greater soil buttress on the open 3:1 south slope. During subsequent design phases, the internal stability\n21 of the waste should be evaluated in conjunction with the waste filling plan.\n22 7.2.3 IDF Leachate Handling System\n23 Operational interfaces for the leachate handling system include the following:\n24 * Coordinate with Liquid Effluent Retention Facility (LERF) for leachate hauling and removal of\n25 leachate from tanks to satisfy the 90-day accumulation period (Treatment capacities at LERF and\n26 leachate flows for critical periods should also be coordinated. See Section 5.9.2.4 for additional\n27 leachate hauling constraints.)\n28 * Use leak detection history for leachate storage tanks, during the operation of IDF, to manage and\n29 plan for replacement of tank liner system and temporary storage required during its replacement.\n30 * Periodic preventative inspection and maintenance for all rotating equipment should be scheduled.\n31 * For leachate tanks floating covers, rain or snow will need to be pumped off with the\n32 manufacturer-included sump pump (mounted on side of tank). Water should not be allowed to\n33 accumulate except at the perimeter of the floating cover. Excessive water may prevent vent\n34 operation and cause mixing between precipitation water and leachate on top of the cover.\n35 * An adequate store of critical spare electrical and mechanical parts should be maintained.\n36 * All valves should be exercised at least annually.\n37 * A small \"contractor-type\" trash pump with hose should be kept on hand that can be used to pump\n38 from the leak detection chamber within the combined sump to its inner sump.\n39 * Periodically, test operation of the combined sump pump should be done.\n40 * Annual testing of all leachate pumps for proper operation should be scheduled.\n41 * Regular verification of level transducer calibration in cells should be done.\n42 * Prior to winter months, proper operation of all heat tracing system should be checked.\n43 * Periodic testing of all control relays, switches and contacts should be scheduled.\n44 * Additional operational interface items will be developed, based on completion of design of the\n45 control system for the leachate handling system. This will be part of the IDF administration\n46 building design.\nAppendix 4A.1.113\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n* Maintenance should be provided in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations.\n2 7.3 Leakage Response Action Plan\n3 WAC 173-303-665(9) regulations require the owner of the operator of a landfill unit to have an approved\n4 Response Action Plan (RAP) before receipt of waste. The RAP is a site-specific plan that establishes\n5 actions to be taken if leakage through the upper (primary) lining system of a landfill exceeds a certain\n6 rate. The intent of the RAP is to assure that any leachate that leaks through the primary lining system will\n7 not migrate out of the landfill into the environment.\n8 A key element of the RAP is the ALR, a threshold value which triggers the responses described in the\n9 RAP, but below which no special actions are required. Because landfill liner systems have not yet been\n10 perfected, a small amount of leakage through the primary liner generally occurs, despite the use of best\n11 available materials, construction techniques, and QA procedures. (This leakage is collected by the LDS\n12 system and removed from the landfill.) Hence, the ALR is set at some level higher than normally\n13 expected leakage rates to serve as an indicator that the primary lining system is not functioning as\n14 expected. Exceeding the ALR may reflect serious failure of the primary lining system and indicates the\n15 need for investigation and possibly corrective action while the problem is still manageable.\n16 This RAP has been prepared in accordance with requirements of WAC 173-303-665(9). The\n17 requirements for determining the ALR are contained in WAC 173-303-665(8) and EPA guidance\n18 document, Action Leakage Rates for Leak Detection Systems (EPA 1992a).\n19 The following sections establish the ALR and discuss response actions to be taken if the ALR is\n20 exceeded.\n21 7.3.1 Action Leakage Rate\n22 Section 5.11 provides a detailed discussion of the analysis to determine the ALR into the LDS for the\n23 IDF. Based on this analyses, the ALR for each IDF cell is 206 gallons per acre per day, or approximately\n24 1,800 gallons per day per cell (each cell area is approximately 8.5 acres). This value includes a factor of\n25 safety of 2 in accordance with EPA guidelines (EPA 1992b). It is also much lower than the LDS pump\n26 capacity. Details of the calculation are presented in Appendix C. 10.\n27 In accordance with WAC 173-303-665(8)(b), the flow rate used to determine if the ALR has been\n28 exceeded will be calculated as the average daily flow rate into the sump, expressed as gallons per acre per\n29 day (unless Ecology approves a different calculation). This calculation will be performed on a weekly\n30 basis during the active (operational) life of the landfill, and monthly after the landfill has been closed.\n31 Post-closure frequency may be reduced if only minimal amounts of leachate accumulate in the LDS\n32 sump. As outlined in WAC 173-303-665(4)(c)(ii), during post-closure monitoring, if the liquid level in\n33 the LDS sump stays below the pump operating level for two consecutive months, monitoring of the\n34 amount of liquid in the LDS sumps can be reduced to at least quarterly. If the liquid level in the LDS\n35 sump stays below the pump operating level for two consecutive quarters, monitoring of the amount of\n36 liquid in the LDS sumps can be reduced to at least semiannually. Pump operating level is defined as a\n37 liquid level approved by Ecology, based on pump activation level, sump dimensions, and level that\n38 minimizes head in the sump.\n39 7.3.2 Response Actions\n40 WAC 173-303-665(9) lists several required actions if the ALR is exceeded. In the event that the ALR is\n41 exceeded, DOE will:\n42 * Notify Ecology in writing of the exceedance within 7 days of the determination.\n43 * Submit a preliminary written assessment to Ecology within 14 days of the determination, as to the\n44 amount of liquids, likely sources of liquids, possible location, size, cause of any leaks, and short-\n45 term actions taken and planned.\n46 * Determine, to the extent practicable, the location, size , and cause of any leak.\nAppendix 4A.1. 114\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * Determine whether waste receipt should cease or be curtailed, whether any waste should be\n2 removed from the unit for inspection, repairs, or controls, and whether or not the unit should be\n3 closed.\n4 * Determine any other short-term and longer-term actions to be taken to mitigate or stop any leaks.\n5 Within 30 days after the notification that the ALR has been exceeded, submit to Ecology the results of the\n6 analyses specified in bullets 3, 4, and 5 of this section, the results of actions taken, and actions planned.\n7 Monthly thereafter, as long as the flow rate in the LDS exceeds the ALR, the owner or operator must\n8 submit to the regional administrator a report summarizing the results of any remedial actions taken and\n9 actions planned.\n10 If the ALR is exceeded, the DOE will submit the required notifications to Ecology, as stated above. The\n11 EPA will also receive copies of this confirmation.\n12 The leachate will be analyzed for chemical compounds and radionuclides. If the analytical results\n13 indicate that these constituents are present, and if the constituents can be traced to a particular type of\n14 waste stored in a known area of the landfill, then it may be possible to estimate the location of the leak.\n15 However, because the waste will meet land disposal restrictions, it will contain no free liquids and will be\n16 stabilized or solidified. In addition, the canister(s) or other type of waste package(s) may not undergo\n17 enough deterioration during the active life of the landfill to permit escape of its contents. For these\n18 reasons, it is possible that the leachate may be clean or the composition too general to indicate a specific\n19 source location.\n20 If the source location cannot be identified, large-scale removal of the waste and operations layer to find\n21 and repair the leaking area of the liner would be one option for remediation. However, this procedure\n22 risks damaging the liner. In addition, waste would have to be handled, stored, and replaced in the landfill.\n23 Backfill would need to be removed from around the waste packages to accomplish this. If the waste\n24 packages are damaged during this process, the risk of accidental release may be high. For these reasons,\n25 large scale removal of waste and liner system materials is not considered a desirable option and will not\n26 be implemented except as a last resort.\n27 The preferred options for remediation include covers and changes in landfill operating procedures. The\n28 preferred alternative will depend on factors such as the amount of waste already in the landfill, the rate of\n29 waste receipt, the chemistry of the leachate, the availability of other RCRA-compliant disposal facilities,\n30 and similar considerations. Hence, at this time no single approach can be selected. If the ALR is\n31 exceeded, potential options will be evaluated prior to selecting a remediation process. If necessary, an\n32 interim solution will be implemented while the evaluation and permanent remediation is performed.\n33 Examples of potential approaches include the following:\n34 * The surface of the intermediate soil cover over the waste could be graded to direct runoff into a\n35 shallow pond. The surface would then be covered with a discardable, temporary geomembrane\n36 (e.g., 30-mil PVC or reinforced polypropylene). Precipitation water would be pumped or\n37 evaporated from the pond and would not infiltrate the waste already in the landfill. Waste\n38 packages would be placed only during periods of dry weather and stored temporarily at other\n39 times. This type of approach would also be used, if necessary, to reduce leakage during the time\n40 immediately after the ALR was exceeded, while other remediation options were being evaluated.\n41 * If the landfill was nearly full, partial construction of the final closure cover might be an option.\n42 This would reduce infiltration into the landfill and possibly the leakage rate, if the cover were\n43 constructed over the failed area.\n44 * A layer of low-permeability soil could be placed over the existing waste, perhaps in conjunction\n45 with a geomembrane, to create a second \"primary\" liner higher in the landfill. This new liner\n46 would intercept precipitation and allow its removal.\nAppendix 4A.1.115\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n* A rigid-frame or air-supported structure could be constructed over the landfill to ensure that no\n2 infiltration occurred. Although costly, this approach might be less expensive than constructing a\n3 new landfill.\n4 In general, the selected remediation efforts would be those that are easiest to implement, with more\n5 difficult or expensive options to be applied only if earlier approaches were not satisfactory.\n6 8.0 REFERENCES\n7 40 CFR 264. Standards for Owners and Operators ofHazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and\n8 Disposal Facilities.\n9 American Water Works Association (AWWA). Factory-Coated Bolted Steel Tanks For Water Storage.\n10 D103-97. Denver, Colorado. 1998\n11 Benson, C.H., and M.A. Othman. Hydraulic Conductivity of Compacted Clay Frozen and Thawed In\n12 Situ. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. Vol. 119, No. 2. February 1993. p. 276.\n13 CETCO. Bent mat / Climax Technical Manual. GCL manufacturer's publication. Colloid\n14 Environmental Technologies Company, Arlington Heights, Illinois. 2001.\n15 CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc., ILA WPreliminary Closure Plan for the Disposal Facility, RPP-6911.\n16 CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc., Conceptual Design Report for ILA WFacility, Project W-520,\n17 RPP-7908, Rev. 0, May 2001.\n18 CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc., System Specification for Immobilized Low-Activity Waste Disposal\n19 System. Revision 3. RPP-7307.\n20 CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc., ILAWProject Definition Criteria for Integrated Disposal Facility.\n21 Revision 1. RPP-7898.\n22 CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc., Design Loads for Tank Farm Facilities. From TFC-ENG-STD-06,\n23 Rev A. Issued September 30, 2002.\n24 CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc., Integrated Disposal Facility Detailed Design Support. Statement of\n25 Work, Rev 2. Req. #92859. February 18, 2003.\n26 CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc., Integrated Disposal Facility Detailed Design Cell I Construction\n27 Quality Assurance Plan, RPP-18490, Attachment 1, Rev. 0, March 2004.\n28 CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc., Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF) Detailed Design: Site Utilities\n29 Design Report, Revision 1, RPP-18515, September 2006.\n30 Cutler-Hammer. Consulting Application Catalog. 12th edition. 2000.\n31 Dames and Moore. Geotechnical and Corrosion Investigation-Grout Vaults, Hanford, Washington.\n32 Prepared for Kieser Engineers, Inc. October 10, 1988.\n33 Daniel, D.E., and C. H. Benson. Water Content-Density Criteria for Compacted Soil Liners. American\n34 Society of Civil Engineers Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. Vol. 116, No. 12. 1990.\n35 pp. 1811-1830.\n36 Daniel, D.E., and H.B. Scranton. Report of 1995 Workshop on Geosynthetic Clay Liners. EPA/600/R-\n37 96/149. June 1996.\n38 Daniel, D.E, et al. Laboratory Hydraulic Conductivity Testing on GCLs in Flexible Wall Permeameters.\n39 Testing and Acceptance Criteria for Geosynthetic Clay Liners. ASTM 1308. 1997.\n40 Design Loads for Tank Farm Facilities. TFC-ENG-STD-06, Revision A.\n41 DOE-ID. INEEL CERCLA Disposal Facility (ICDF) Liner Leachate Compatibility Study. EDF-ER-278,\n42 Rev. 2. U.S. Department of Energy Idaho Operations Office, Idaho Falls, Idaho. May 2002.\nAppendix 4A.1.116\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 DOE/RL-91-28. Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application, General Information Portion.\n2 U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington. Updated\n3 periodically.\n4 DOE/RL-97-55. Hanford Site Environmental Management Specification. Revision 2. U.S. Department\n5 of Energy, Washington, D.C.\n6 DOE/RL-97-67. Pollution Prevention and Best Management Practices Plan for State Waste Discharge\n7 Permits SR 4508, ST 4509, and ST 4510. Revision 3. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington D.C.\n8 January 2000.\n9 DOE/RW-0164. Consultant Draft Site Characterization Plan Repository Location, Hanford Site,\n10 Washington. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.\n11 EPA. Action Leakage Rates for Leak Detection Systems. EPA 530-R-92-004. Office of Solid Waste\n12 Management, Washington, D.C. January, 1992a.\n13 EPA. Liners and Leak Detection Systems for Hazardous Waste Land Disposal Units. Published in the\n14 Federal Register, Vol. 57, No 19. January 29, 1992b.\n15 EPA, SW-846 Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods, Method 9090.\n16 Compatibility Test for Wastes and Membrane Liners. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office\n17 of Solid Waste Management, Washington, D.C. 1992c.\n18 Flour Hanford, Inc., Hanford Site Solid Waste Acceptance Criteria (HSSWAC). HNF-EP-0063, Rev. 5.\n19 Richland, Washington. 1998.\n20 Geosynthetic Research Institute (GRI). Determination of the Allowable Flow Rate of a Drainage\n21 Geocomposite. Standard GC-8. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. April 2001.\n22 Giroud, J.P. Equations for Calculating the Rate ofLiquid Migration Through Composite Liners Due to\n23 Geomembrane Defects. Geosynthetics International. Vol. 4, No. 3-4. 1997. pp.335-348.\n24 Golder Associates. Site Investigation Report, Non-Drag-OffLandfill Site, Low Level Burial Area No. 5,\n25 200 West Area. WHC-SD-W025-SE-001. Prepared for U.S. Department of Energy, Richland,\n26 Washington. 1989.\n27 Golder Associates. Geosynthetic Liner/Leachate Compatibility Testing in Support of Project W-025\n28 Radioactive Mixed Waste Disposal Facility. WHC-SD-W025-TRP-00 1. Prepared for Westinghouse\n29 Hanford Company, Richland, Washington. 1991a.\n30 Golder Associates. Soil Liner/Leachate Compatibility Testing in Support ofProject W-025 Radioactive\n31 Mixed Waste Disposal Facility. WHC-SD-W025-TRP-002. Prepared for Westinghouse Hanford\n32 Company, Richland, Washington. 1991b.\n33 Golder Associates. W025 Construction QA Report -Landfill #1. WHC-SD-W025-RPT-001. Prepared\n34 for Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington. 1994a.\n35 Golder Associates. Design Report, Project W-025, Radioactive Mixed Waste Land Disposal Facility.\n36 Rev 1, Vol 1, SD-W025-FDR-001. 1994b.\n37 Golder Associates. W025 Construction QA Report -Landfill #2. WHC-SD-W025-RPT-002. 1995.\n38 Hewitt, R.D., and D.E. Daniel. Hydraulic Conductivity of Geosynthetic Clay Liners After Freeze-Thaw.\n39 Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. Vol. 123, No. 4. April 1997. p. 305.\n40 HNF-IP-0842 Vol. 4, Section 3.6. July 30, 2002.\n41 IEEE. Green Book. Standard 142. 1991.\n42 IEEE. Red Book, Standard 141, 1993.\n43 Integrated Engineering Software, Inc., Lighting Handbook, 2000\nAppendix 4A.1.117\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Integrated Engineering Software, Inc., Visual Analysis Version 4.0. 2000.\n2 Kircher, J.F., and R.E. Bowman. Effects of Radiation on Material and Components. Reinhold Publishing\n3 Corporation, New York, New York. 1964.\n4 Kim, W.H., and D.E. Daniel. Effects of Freezing on the Hydraulic Conductivity of a Compacted Clay.\n5 Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. Vol. 118, No. 7. 1992. p. 1083.\n6 Koerner, R.M., Y.H. Halse, and A.E. Lord, Jr. Long-Term Durability and Aging of Geomembranes.\n7 Waste Containment. ASTM Special Publication No. 26. American Society of Engineers, New York,\n8 New York. 1990.\n9 Koerner, R.M. Designing with Geosynthetics. 4th edition. Prentice Hall, New Jersey. 1998.\n10 Kraus, J.F., C.H. Benson, A.E. Erickson, and E.J. Chamberlain. Freeze-Thaw and Hydraulic\n11 Conductivity ofBentonitic Barriers. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering.\n12 Vol. 123, No. 3. March 1997. p. 229.\n13 LaGatta, M. D., B.T. Boardman, B.H. Cooley and D.E. Daniel. Geosynthetic Clay Liners Subjected to\n14 Differential Settlement. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. Vol. 123,\n15 No. 3. March 1997.p. 402.\n16 Lindsey, K.A. The Miocene to Pliocene Ringold Formation and Associated Deposits of the Ancestral\n17 Columbia River System, South-central Washington and North-central Oregon. Open File Report 96-\n18 8. Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Earth Resources,\n19 Olympia, Washington. 1996.\n20 Mann, R.M., R.J. Pugh, P.D. Rittmann, N.W. Kline, J.A. Voogd, Y. Chen, C.R. Eiholzer, C.T. Kincaid,\n21 B.P. McGrail, A.H. Lu, G.F. Williamson, N.R. Brown, and P.E. LaMont. Hanford Immobilized\n22 Low-Activity Tank Waste Performance Assessment. DOE/RL-97-69. U.S. Department of Energy\n23 Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington. 1998.\n24 National Electric Code (NEC). Articles 220, 225, 430, 440, and 450. 2002.\n25 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). Clastic Injection Dikes of the Pasco Basin and Vicinity.\n26 BHI-01 103. Richland, Washington. Not dated.\n27 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). Selected Water Table Contour Maps and Well\n28 Hydrographs for the Hanford Reservation, 1944-1973. BNWL-B-360. Richland, Washington.\n29 Not dated.\n30 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). Immobilized Low-Activity Waste Site Borehole\n31 299-E17-21. PNNL-11957. Richland, Washington. 1998.\n32 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). Geologic Data Package for 2001 Immobilized\n33 Low-Activity Waste Performance Assessment. Rev 1. PNNL-12257. Richland, Washington. 1999.\n34 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). Revised Hydrogeology for the Suprebasalt Aquifer\n35 System, 200-East Area and Vicinity, Hanford Site. PNNL-12261. Richland, Washington. 2000.\n36 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). Groundwater Flow and Transport Calculations\n37 Supporting the Immobilized Low-Activity Waste Disposal Facility Performance Assessment.\n38 PNNL-13400. Richland, Washington. 2000.\n39 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring for Fiscal Year\n40 2000. PNNL-13404. Richland, Washington. 2001.\n41 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). Geologic and Wireline Borehole Summary from the\n42 Second ILAWBorehole (299-W24-21). PNNL-13652. Richland, Washington. 2001.\nAppendix 4A.1.118\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring for Fiscal Year\n2 2001. PNNL-13788. M.J. Hartman, L.F. Morasch, and W.D. Webber. Richland, Washington.\n3 2002.\n4 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). Geologic and Wireline Summaries from Fiscal Year\n5 2002 ILAWBoreholes. S.P. Reidel and A.M. Ho. PNNL-14029. Richland, Washington. 2002.\n6 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). Hanford Site Climatological Data Summary 2001, with\n7 Historical Data. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy. May 2002.\n8 Reidel, S.P., and K.R. Fecht. Geologic Map of the Richland 1:100,000 Quadrangle, Washington.\n9 Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report 94-8. Washington State\n10 Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington. 1994.\n11 RHO-BWI-ST-14. Subsurface Geology of the Cold Creek Syncline. Rockwell Hanford Operations,\n12 Richland, Washington.\n13 Ruhl, Janice L., and David E. Daniel. Geosynthetic Clay Liners Permeated with Chemical Solutions and\n14 Leachates. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. Vol. 123, No. 3. 1997.\n15 p.369.\n16 Schroeder, Paul R., Tamsen S. Dozier, Paul A. Zappi, Bruce M. McEnroe, John W. Sjostrom, and R. Lee\n17 Peyton. The Hydrologic Evaluation ofLandfill Performance (HELP) Model, Engineering\n18 Documentation for Version 3. Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, Office of Research and\n19 Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, Ohio. November 1997.\n20 Shackelford, Charles D., Craig H. Benson, Takeshi Katsumi, Tuncer B. Edil, and L. Lin. Evaluating the\n21 Hydraulic Conductivity of GCLs Permeated With Non-Standard Liquids. Geotextiles and\n22 Geomembranes. Vol. 18. 2000. pp. 133-161.\n23 Shannon & Wilson. Final Report-Geotechnical Investigation (River Protection Project-Waste Treatment\n24 Plant). Conducted for BNFL, Richland, Washington. May 2000.\n25 Shannon and Wilson. Geotechnical Report Supplement Structural Foundation Analysis. No. 1. 22-1 -\n26 01753-001 (River Protection Project-Waste Treatment Plant). Conducted for CH2M HILL Hanford\n27 Group, Inc., Richland, Washington. April 2001.\n28 Sharma, Hari D., and Sangeeta P. Lewis. Waste Containment Systems, Waste Stabilization, and Landfills\n29 Design and Evaluation. John Wiley and Sons, Inc. 1994.\n30 TRI/Environmental. A Final Report for Laboratory Testing of Geomembrane for Waste Containment\n31 EPA Method 9090. WHC-SD-WM-TRP-237. Prepared for Westinghouse Hanford Company,\n32 Richland, Washington. 1995.\n33 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Evaluation ofLiner/Leachate Chemical Compatibility For the\n34 Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility. Walla Walla, Washington. 1995.\n35 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Flood Hydrograph Package (HEC-1). Hydrologic Engineering Center.\n36 Revised June 1988.\n37 U.S. Department of Agriculture. Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. Technical Release 55. Soil\n38 Conservation Service, Engineering Division. June 1986.\n39 U.S. Geological Survey. Study and Interpretation of the Chemical Characteristics ofNatural Water.\n40 Water-Supply Paper 2254. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 1989.\n41 Washington Administrative Code (WAC). Washington State Dangerous Waste Regulations. Chapter\n42 173-303.\n43 Washington State Department of Ecology. State Waste Discharge Permit Number ST 4510. Issued to the\n44 U.S. Department of Energy. April 1, 1999.\nAppendix 4A.1.119\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC). Field Trip Guide to the Hanford Site. WHC-MR-0391.\n2 Richland, Washington. 1991.\n3 Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC). Contaminant Transport in the Unconfined Aquifer, Input to\n4 the Low-Level Tank Waste Interim Performance Assessment. WHC-SD-WM-RPT-241. Richland,\n5 Washington. Not dated.\n6 Westinghouse Hanford Company (WHC). High Density Polyethylene Liner Chemical Computability for\n7 Radioactive Mixed Waste Trenches, WHC-SD-WM-TI-714. Richland, Washington, 1995.\n8\nAppendix 4A.1.120\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAppendix 4A.1.121\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nAPPENDIX 4A -SECTION 2\nCRITICAL SYSTEMS TABLES & DATA SHEETS\nAppendix 4A.2.i\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAppendix 4A.2.ii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2 APPENDIX 4A -SECTION 2\n3 CRITICAL SYSTEMS TABLES & DATA SHEETS\n4\n5\n6 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n7 02315 -Specification for Fill and Backfill ............... 5............ ............. 5\n8 02319 -Specification for Subgrade Preparation .......................................... 11\n9 02371 -Table 1. Required Geotextile Properties ............................... ...... 13\n10 02373 -Table 1. Required Geonet Properties ....................................... 14\n11 02373 -Table 2. Required CDN Properties ................................ ......... 14\n12 02661 -Table 1. Required Geomembrane Properties 60-Mil Textured HDPE ................. 15.\n13 02661 -Table 2. Required Seam Properties HDPE Geomembranes ................... ..... 16\n14 11305-01 -Sump Pump Data Sheet....................................................18\n15 11305-02 -Sump Pump Data Sheet .............................. ................... 19\n16 11306-01 -Leachate Pump Data Sheet.............................................20\n17 11306-02 -Leachate Pump Data Sheet.....................................22\n18 11306-03 -Leachate Pump Data Sheet............................................24\n19 11312-01 -Horizontal End Suction Centrifugal Pump Data Sheet................................25\n20\nAppendix 4A.2.iii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAppendix 4A.2.iv\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 02315 -Specification for Fill and Backfill\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 Work Included\n4 This section describes placement and testing of fill and backfill in general areas of the site (including\n5 stockpiles).\n6 References\n7 The following is a list of standards, which may be referenced in this section:\n8 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n9 ASTM D75 Standard Practice for Sampling Aggregates\n10 ASTM D422 Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils\n11 ASTM D698 Test Method for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard\n12 Effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m'))\n13 ASTM Dl 140 Standard Test Method for Amount of Material in Soils Finer than the No. 200 (75\n14 micrometer) Sieve\n15 ASTM D1556 Standard Test Method for Density and Unit Weight of Soil in Place by the Sand-\n16 Cone Method\n17 ASTM D2216 Standard Test Method for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture)\n18 Content of Soil and Rock by Mass.\n19 ASTM D2922 Standard Test Methods for Density of Soil and Soil-Aggregate in Place by\n20 Nuclear Methods (Shallow Depth)\n21 ASTM D3017 Standard Test Method for Water Content of Soil and Rock in Place by Nuclear\n22 Methods (Shallow Depth)\n23 Definitions\n24 Relative Compaction: Ratio, in percent, of as-compacted field dry density to laboratory maximum dry\n25 density as determined in accordance with ASTM D698.\n26 Apply corrections for oversize material to maximum dry density.\n27 Optimum Moisture Content: Determined in accordance with ASTM D698 specified to determine\n28 maximum dry density for relative compaction.\n29 Prepared Ground Surface: Ground surface after completion of required demolition, clearing and\n30 grubbing, scalping of sod, stripping of topsoil, excavation to grade, and subgrade preparation.\n31 Completed Course: A course or layer that is ready for next layer or next phase of Work.\n32 Lift: Loose (uncompacted) layer of material.\n33 Geosynthetics: Geotextiles, geocomposites, geosynthetic clay liner, or geomembranes.\n34 Well-Graded: A mixture of particle sizes with no specific concentration or lack thereof of one or more\n35 sizes.\n36 Does not define numerical value that must be placed on coefficient of uniformity, coefficient of curvature,\n37 or other specific grain size distribution parameters.\n38 Used to define material type that, when compacted, produces a strong and relatively incompressible soil\n39 mass free from detrimental voids.\nAppendix 4A.2.5\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Influence Area: Area within planes sloped downward and outward at 60-degree angle from horizontal\n2 measured from:\n3 * 1-foot outside outermost edge at base of foundations or slabs.\n4 * 1-foot outside outermost edge at surface of roadways or shoulder.\n5 * 0.5-foot outside exterior at spring line of pipes or culverts.\n6 Imported Material: Materials obtained from sources offsite, suitable for specified use.\n7 Standard Specifications: When referenced in this section, shall mean Standard Specifications for Road,\n8 Bridge, and Municipal Construction, as published by the Washington State Department of Transportation,\n9 2002 edition, English units.\n10 SLDS: Secondary Leak Detection System.\n11 Permanent Stockpile:_ Stockpile of material that remains at the completion of construction.\n12 Submittals-Approval Required\n13 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n14 Submit gradation test results for all imported materials from independent testing laboratory as specified in\n15 paragraph SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL in Part 2.\n16 Stockpile Plan: Prior to any excavation activities associated with construction of the IDF, Construction\n17 General Contractor shall submit a Stockpile Plan for approval. The plan shall include the following\n18 information:\n19 Scale drawing, using the project plans as a base, which shows the proposed location for stockpiles on the\n20 project site. Show all access roads around stockpiles. Address stockpile locations during construction of\n21 the IDF and permanent stockpiles, which will remain upon completion of construction activities for this\n22 project.\n23 Stockpile layout drawings, which show the estimated location of toe of slope and top of slope for each\n24 stockpile. Drawings shall show plan and typical sections and shall be fully dimensioned.\n25 Plan shall show how differing materials encountered during the excavation will be segregated for future\n26 use. This includes material for use as topsoil, admix base soil, and operations layer. Also, show a\n27 stockpile area for material to be used in the future as clean backfill during landfill operations by the Tank\n28 Farm Contractor.\n29 Method by which stockpile compaction will be achieved.\n30 Dust control for the stockpiles during active use and until grass is established.\n31 Placing of topsoil, seeding, fertilizing, and mulching each stockpile after active use of stockpile is\n32 finished in accordance with Section 02920, RECLAMATION AND REVEGETATION.\n33 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n34 Information/Record (IR):\n35 Qualifications of independent testing laboratory.\n36 Qualifications of construction quality control personnel.\n37 Construction quality control test reports\n38 Sequencinq and Scheduling\n39 Complete applicable Work specified in Sections 02316, EXCAVATION, and 02319, SUBGRADE\n40 PREPARATION, prior to placing fill or backfill.\nAppendix 4A.2.6\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Permit Requirements\n2 A backfill and fill permit is required for each backfill and fill work element. Construction General\n3 Contractor shall obtain from Tank Farm Contractor and post before starting backfill and fill work, as\n4 specified in Division 1, General Requirements.\n5 Construction Quality Assurance:\n6 The Construction General Contractor shall accommodate all CQA activities described herein and in the\n7 CPA Plan for this project. The CQA Plan is made part of these Specifications by reference.\n8 The CQA Certifying Engineer shall determine in-place density and moisture content by any one or\n9 combination of the following methods: ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017, ASTM D1556, ASTM D2216, or\n10 other methods approved by the Construction Manager.\n11 Testing requirements and locations will be determined by the CQA Certifying Engineer. Construction\n12 General Contractor shall cooperate with the CQA Certifying Engineer and testing work by leveling small\n13 test areas designated by the CQA Certifying Engineer. Backfill test areas at Construction General\n14 Contractor's sole expense. The CQA Certifying Engineer may have any material tested at any time,\n15 location, or elevation.\n16 After Construction General Contractor makes repairs to any areas failing a test, the Construction General\n17 Contractor shall rerun appropriate tests, subject to the approval of the CQA Certifying Engineer, to\n18 demonstrate the area meets specifications, at the Construction General Contractor's sole expense.\n19 The following minimum test schedule shall be assumed. Additional tests may be required as directed by\n20 CQA Certifying Engineer.\n21 In-place density tests shall be made on the following minimum schedule:\n22 Earth fill: One per 5,000 square feet (ft2) per lift.\n23 Structural Fill: One per 2,500 ft2 per lift.\n24 Subgrade Preparation: Four per acre.\n25 Operations Layer (Outside Edge of Liner): One per 5,000 ft2 per lift.\n26 Operations Layer Material (SLDS): Two (2) per lift.\n27 Standard Proctor (ASTM D698) laboratory density curves (five-point minimum) shall be performed for\n28 each material by the CQA Certifying Engineer. Samples of native materials used for embankment and\n29 backfill and samples of imported materials shall be taken at locations as specified by CQA Certifying\n30 Engineer.\n31 Gradation tests (sieve analysis) shall be performed in accordance with ASTM D422 on operations layer\n32 material obtained from required excavations to demonstrate the materials meet the Specifications.\n33 Samples of operations layer material shall be taken from each 10,000 cubic yards of placed material in\n34 accordance with ASTM D75.\n35 Part 2 -Products\n36 Earthfill\n37 Excavated material from required excavations and designated borrow sites, free from rocks larger than\n38 4 inches in the greatest dimension, from roots and other organic matter, ashes, cinders, trash, debris, and\n39 other deleterious materials.\n40 Structural Fill\n41 Structural fill adjacent to concrete structures shall be as specified in Section 02320, TRENCH\n42 BACKFILL, for Pipe Bedding. Structural fill beneath concrete structures and beneath leachate storage\n43 tank shall conform to the requirements of Section 9-03 9(3) Crushed Surfacing-Top Course in the\n44 Standard Specifications.\nAppendix 4A.2.7\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Operations Layer\n2 Meeting the requirements of earthfill above and having a maximum of 25 percent by weight passing the\n3 No. 200 U.S. sieve and a maximum particle size of 2 inches.\n4 Drain Gravel\n5 Material for drain gravel shall conform to the requirements of Section 9-03.12(4) of the Standard\n6 Specifications except material shall be subrounded to rounded gravel. Crushed rock and angular gravel\n7 shall not be allowed.\n8 Crushed Surfacing\n9 Material for crushed surfacing-base course and top course shall conform to the requirements in\n10 Section 9-03 9(3) of the Standard Specifications.\n11 Quarry Spalls\n12 Quarry spalls shall consist of broken stone free from segregation, seams, cracks, and other defects tending\n13 to destroy its resistance to weather and shall meet the following requirements for grading:\n14 * Maximum Size: 8 inches\n15 * 50 percent by weight shall be larger than 3 inches\n16 * Minimum Size: 3/4 inch\n17 Source Quality Control\n18 Gradation tests performed in accordance with ASTM D422 by a qualified independent testing laboratory\n19 shall be made for imported materials on samples taken at place of production prior to shipment. Imported\n20 materials shall not be shipped without submittal approval. Samples of the finished product for gradation\n21 testing shall be taken from each 2,000 tons of prepared materials in accordance with ASTM D75. Test\n22 results shall be submitted to Construction Manager within 48 hours after sampling. Size distribution for\n23 imported quarry spalls material shall be determined in accordance with one of the methods described in\n24 ASTM D5519.\n25 Base Soil\n26 As specified in Section 02666, ADMIX LINER.\n27 WATER FOR MOISTURE CONDITIONING:\n28 See Section 02200, SITE PREPARATION, for raw water supply availability and requirements for proper\n29 compaction.\n30 Part 3 -Execution\n31 General\n32 Keep placement surfaces free of water, debris, and foreign material during placement and compaction of\n33 fill and backfill materials.\n34 Place and spread fill and backfill materials in horizontal lifts of uniform thickness as specified in\n35 paragraphs BACKFILL UNDER AND AROUND STRUCTURES and FILL, in a manner that avoids\n36 segregation, and compact each lift to specified densities prior to placing succeeding lifts. Slope lifts only\n37 where necessary to conform to final grades or as necessary to keep placement surfaces drained of water.\n38 Do not place fill or backfill, if fill or backfill material is frozen, or if surface upon which fill or backfill is\n39 to be placed is frozen.\n40 Tolerances:\n41 Final Lines and Grades: Within a tolerance of 0.1-foot unless dimensions or grades are shown or\n42 specified otherwise.\nAppendix 4A.2.8\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Grade to establish and maintain slopes and drainage as shown. Reverse slopes are not permitted.\n2 Settlement: Correct and repair any subsequent damage to structures, pavements, curbs, slabs, piping, and\n3 other facilities, caused by settlement of fill or backfill material.\n4 Backfill Under and Around Structures\n5 Under Facilities: Backfill with earthfill or structural fill, as shown on the Drawings, for each structure or\n6 facility. Place earthfill or structural fill in lifts of 6-inch maximum compacted thickness and compact\n7 each lift to minimum of 95 percent relative compaction as determined in accordance with ASTM D698.\n8 Fill\n9 Outside Influence Areas Beneath Structures, Slabs, Piping, and Other Facilities: Unless otherwise\n10 shown, place earthfill as follows:\n11 * Allow for 6-inch thickness of topsoil where required.\n12 * Maximum 8-inch thick lifts.\n13 * Place and compact fill across full width of embankment.\n14 * Compact to minimum 95 percent relative compaction.\n15 Replacinq Overexcavated Material\n16 Replace excavation carried below grade lines shown as follows:\n17 Beneath IDF Cell: Earthfill as specified herein.\n18 Beneath Fill or Backfill: Same material as specified for overlying fill or backfill.\n19 Beneath Structures and Roadways: Structural fill or earthfill as shown on the Drawings and specified\n20 herein.\n21 Topsoil\n22 Place topsoil on areas disturbed by construction and on permanent stockpile slopes in accordance with\n23 Section 02920, RECLAMATION AND REVEGETATION.\n24 Stockpilinq\n25 Material shall be placed in permanent stockpiles as follows:\n26 Place material in maximum 3-foot lifts and compact with a minimum four passes with earth-moving\n27 equipment. Uniformly route hauls truck traffic across the surface of each lift to aid in lift compaction.\n28 Maximum slopes shall be 3H: lV. Minimum slopes shall be 3 percent to promote drainage.\n29 Upper 2 feet of stockpile surface shall be placed in maximum 12-inch thick lifts and compacted to\n30 minimum 90 percent relative compaction as determined in accordance with ASTM D698.\n31 Place 6-inch thick layer of topsoil on completed slopes in accordance with Section 02920,\n32 RECLAMATION AND REVEGETATION.\n33 Permanent stockpiles shall be seeded, fertilized, and mulched when each stockpile is completed and\n34 as directed by the Engineer in accordance with Section 02920, RECLAMATION AND\n35 REVEGETATION.\n36 Placing Crushed Surfacing\n37 Place crushed surfacing base course and top course at locations shown on the Drawings. Placement shall\n38 conform to Section 4-04.3 of the Standard Specifications.\n39 Thickness of the drain gravel on the cell floor shall be a minimum of 1.0 foot (increase drain gravel\n40 thickness in vicinity of LCRS collection and riser pipes as shown on drawings) and tolerances for the top\n41 of the drain gravel shall be grade to plus 0.2 foot.\nAppendix 4A.2.9\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Placing DRAIN GRAVEL and operations layer over geosynthetics:\n2 Place material over geosynthetics as specified in Sections 02371, GEOTEXTILES; 02661,\n3 GEOMEMBRANES; and 02667, GEOSYNTHETIC CLAY LINER (GCL).\n4 Compaction requirements for drain gravel on the cell floor, around pipes, and the sumps are specified\n5 in Section 02320, TRENCH BACKFILL.\n6 Operations layer within lining system limits, except as specified for SLDS sump area, shall be placed\n7 in 12-inch thick lifts and track-walked into place with a minimum two passes with a Caterpillar D6M-\n8 LGP or equal. Operations layer material within SLDS sump area shall be placed in 12-inch thick lifts\n9 and compacted to 90 percent relative compaction. Operations layer placed outside edge of liner, such\n10 as for shine berm, shall be placed in maximum 8-inch thick lifts and compacted to 95 percent relative\n11 compaction.\n12 Place material to the lines and grades shown and compact by tracking a minimum two passes with\n13 spreading equipment. Thickness of the operations layer shall be a minimum 3 feet and tolerances for\n14 top of operations layer shall be grade to plus 0.3 foot.\n15 Quarry Spalls Placement\n16 Quarry spalls shall be placed around the ends of stormwater pipes to provide erosion protection in\n17 accordance with the Plans and as directed by the Engineer. Quarry spalls shall be placed in such a\n18 manner that all relatively large stones are essentially in contact with each other and voids are filled with\n.19 the finer materials to provide a well graded compact mass. Finished surface shall be free from\n20 irregularities. The stone shall be dumped on the ground in a manner that will ensure the stone attains its\n21 specified thickness in one operation. When dumping or placing, care shall be used to avoid damaging the\n22 underlying material. Stone shall not be dumped from height greater than 12 inches above surface.\n23 Material placement shall be started from the bottom of the installation, working toward edges. Geotextile\n24 damaged during the placement of quarry spalls shall be repaired at Construction General Contractor's sole\n25 expense.\n26 Construction Quality Control\n27 The Construction General Contractor shall perform in-place density and moisture content tests with own\n28 qualified personnel or with a qualified independent testing laboratory as specified in paragraph\n29 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE, to be observed by the Construction Manager, on the\n30 following minimum schedule:\n31 Material Placed by Stockpile (Upper 2 Feet): One per 10,000 ft2 per lift.\n32 Construction General Contractor shall submit qualifications of personnel or independent testing\n33 laboratory that will perform construction quality control.\n34 END OF SECTION 0231\nAppendix 4A.2.10\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 02319 -Specification for Subgrade Preparation\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 Work Included\n4 This section describes requirements for preparation of subgrades in areas to receive fill.\n5 References\n6 The following is a list of standards, which may be referenced in this section:\n7 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n8 ASTM D698 Test Method for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard\n9 Effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft (600 kN-m/m'))\n10 Definitions\n11 Optimum Moisture Content: As defined in Section 02315, FILL AND BACKFILL.\n12 Prepared Ground Surface: Ground surface after completion of clearing and grubbing, scalping of sod,\n13 stripping of topsoil, excavation to grade, and scarification and compaction of subgrade.\n14 Relative Compaction: As defined in Section 02315, FILL AND BACKFILL.\n15 SLDS: Secondary Leak Detection System.\n16 Subgrade: Layer of existing soil after completion of excavation to grade prior to placement of fill,\n17 roadway structure, or base for floor slab.\n18 Proof Rolling: Testing of subgrade as specified herein to identify soft or loose zones requiring\n19 correction.\n20 Sequencing and Scheduling\n21 Complete applicable Work specified in Section 02316, EXCAVATION, prior to subgrade preparation.\n22 Construction Quality Assurance\n23 The CQA Certifying Engineer shall determine in-place density and moisture for subgrade preparation as\n24 specified in Section 02315, FILL AND BACKFILL, except for prepared subgrade for admix on\n25 sideslopes.\n26 CQA requirements for geomembrane subgrade preparation are specified in Section 02661,\n27 GEOMEMBRANES.\n28 Part 2 -Products (Not Used)\n29 Part 3 -Execution\n30 General\n31 Keep subgrade free of water, debris, and foreign matter during compaction or proof rolling.\n32 Bring subgrade to proper grade and cross-section as shown on the Drawings, and uniformly compact\n33 surface.\n34 Maintain prepared ground surface in finished condition until next course is placed.\n35 Prepared Subgrade for Roadway, Embankment, and Structures\n36 After completion of excavation and prior to foundation, road fill, structural fill, or embankment\n37 construction, compact prepared subgrade to 95 percent relative compaction. Scarify and moisture\n38 condition subgrade soil as required to achieve specified compaction.\nAppendix 4A.2.11\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI If soft or loose zones are found, correct as specified herein. Proof-roll subgrade with a fully loaded dump\n2 truck or equal to detect soft or loose subgrade or unsuitable material.\n3 Landfill Bottom Floor Prepared Subqrade For Admix Liner\n4 Prior to admix liner placement, subgrade shall be back bladed to remove loose soil. Low spots or erosion\n5 rills shall be backfilled with structural fill as specified herein. Compact prepared subgrade to 95 percent\n6 relative compaction. Scarify and moisture condition subgrade soil as required to achieve specified\n7 compaction. If soft or loose zones are found, correct as specified herein. Proof-roll subgrade with a\n8 vibratory drum roller or equal to detect soft or loose subgrade or unsuitable material.\n9 Landfill Sideslope (3H: 1V) Prepared Subqrade For Admix Liner\n10 Prior to admix placement, the subgrade shall be back bladed to remove all loose material produced by\n11 trimming operations. Low spots or erosion rills shall be backfilled with structural fill as specified herein.\n12 The trimmed surface shall be watered so that moisture penetrates a minimum of 3 inches into the\n13 subgrade. The trimmed and watered surface shall be track-walked by D6-LGP dozer or equivalent with a\n14 minimum 4 passes to produce a firm and stable subgrade. Visual monitoring (no in-place density testing\n15 is required) of the subgrade preparation on sideslopes will be performed by the CQA Certifying Engineer.\n16 Prepared Subqrade for Geomembrane (Secondary And SLDS) And Secondary GCI\n17 At completion of SLDS excavation and grading (SLDS geomembrane) or admix liner placement\n18 (secondary geomembrane and GCL), prepare the subgrade surface for geomembrane or GCL placement.\n19 The surface shall not have holes, depressions more than 1 inch in a 12-inch width, nor protrusions\n20 extending above the surface more than 1/2 inch. Roll surface with smooth-drum roller to form a firm\n21 stable base. Allow for leachate piping and sumps or features as shown on the Drawings.\n22 Correction\n23 Soft or Loose Subgrade:\n24 Adjust moisture content and compact to meet density requirements, or\n25 Over excavate and replace with suitable material from the excavation, as specified in Section 02315,\n26 FILL AND BACKFILL.\n27 Unsuitable Material: Over excavate and replace with suitable material from the excavation, as specified\n28 in Section 02315, FILL AND BACKFILL. Dispose of unsuitable material excavation in accordance with\n29 Article DISPOSAL OF SPOIL in Section 02316, EXCAVATION.\n30 END OF SECTION 02319\n31\n32\nAppendix 4A.2.12\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 02371 -Table 1. Required Geotextile Properties\n2 Value(a)\nProperty Unit Type 1 Type 2 Test Method\nMass/Unit Area oz/yd2 6.0(b) 12.0(b) ASTM D5261 or D3776\nApparent Opening U.S. Sieve 70 max opening - ASTM D4751\nSize(b) 100 min opening\nGrab Strength lb 140 300 ASTM D4632\nTrapezoidal Tear\nStrength lb 70 110\nASTM D4533\nPuncture Strength lb 65 135 ASTM D4833\nPermittivity sec' 1.2 - ASTM D4491\nUV Resistance % (500 hours) retained 70 70 ASTM D4355\nstrength\n3 Notes:\n4 (a)AIl values are minimum average values, except as noted.(b) Nominal values.\nAppendix 4A.2.13\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 02373 -Table 1. Required Geonet Properties\nProperty Qualifier Unit Value Test\nPolymer Composition Minimum % polyethylene 95\nResin Specific Gravity Minimum N/A 0.92 ASTM D1505\nCarbon Black Content Range %2 -3 ASTM D1603 or D4218\nNominal Thickness MARV mils 250 ASTM D1777 or D5199\nNominal Transmissivity(a1 MARV m2/sec 3 x 10- ASTM D4716\n2\n3 02373 -Table 2. Required CDN Properties\nProperty Qualifier Unit Value Test\nPly Adhesion ARV lb/in 1.0 ASTM D413 or GRI-GC7\nTransmissivity(') MARV m2/sec 5 x 10-4 ASTM D4716\n4 Notes:\n5 MARV = Minimum Average Roll Value.\n6 ARV = Average Roll Value.\n7 (')The design transmissivity is the hydraulic transmissivity of the CDN measured using water at 70 degrees F ±3 degrees F with a\n8 hydraulic gradient of 0.1, under the compressive stress of 10,000 psf. Transmissivity value shall be measured between two steel\n9 plates 15 minutes after application of the confining stress in the machine direction.\n10\nAppendix 4A.2.14\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n02661 -Table 1. Required Geomembrane Properties 60-Mil Textured HDPE\nSpecified Property Qualifier Unit Value Test Method\nPhysical Properties\nThickness min. avg. value mils 60 ASTM D5994\nminimum 54 ASTM D5994\nSpecific Gravity minimum 'N/A 0.932 ASTM D1505\nMelt Index range g/10 min <1.1 ASTM D1238 condition\n190/2.16\nAsperity min avg. value' mils 10 GRI-GM12\nMechanical Properties\nTensile Properties (each direction) (Type IV) ASTM D638\nStrength at yield min. avg. value lb/in 120\nElongation at yield2 min. avg. value % 12\nTear Resistance min. avg. value lb 42 ASTM D1004\nPuncture Resistance min. avg. value lb 80 ASTM D4833\nCarbon Black Content Range % 2-3 ASTM DI 603 or D4218\nCarbon Black Dispersion Minimum' 8 of 10 category 1 or 2 ASTM D5596\nEnvironmental Stress\nCrack minimum' hrs 200 ASTM D5397\n2 1 Of 10 readings, 8 out of 10 must be greater or equal to 7 mils, and lowest individual reading must be greater or equal to 5 mils.\n3 Provide data for both sides of textured geomembrane.\n4 2 Yield elongation is calculated using a gauge length of 1.3 inches.\n5 3 Minimum = mean minus 3 standard deviations from documented manufacturer's quality control (MQC) testing.\n6\nAppendix 4A.2.15\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 02661 -Table 2. Required Seam Properties HDPE Geomembranes\nProperty Qualifier Unit Specified Value Test Method\nShear Strength' minimum lb/in width 90% of tensile strength at yield as ASTM D6392\nlisted in tables in this section\nPeel Adhesion minimum lb/in width 60% of tensile strength at yield as ASTM D6392\nlisted in tables in this section and\nFTB2\n2 'Also called \"Bonded Seam Strength\".\n3 2FTB = Film Tear Bond (failure occurs through intact geomembrane, not through seam).\n4\nAppendix 4A.2.16\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Geomembrane Installer's Certification of Subsurface Acceptability\n2 The geomembrane installer,\n3 for the Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF), hereby certifies that the supporting prepared subgrade surfaces\n4 are acceptable for installation of the HDPE geomembrane lining system, the undersigned having\n5 personally inspected the condition of the constructed surfaces. This certification is for the areas shown on\n6 Attachment or defined as follows:\n7 The condition of the supporting surfaces in the defined area meets or exceeds the minimum requirements\n8 for installation of the geomembrane.\n9 Signed: Signed:\n10 Geomembrane Installer Construction General Contractor\n11\n12\n13 Date Signed Date Signed\n14\nAppendix 4A.2.17\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 11305-01 -Sump Pump Data Sheet\n2 Tag Numbers: 219A-LH-P-207, 219E-LH-P-207\n3 Pump Locations and I.D.: Buildings 219A and 219E, Combined Sump Pump\n4 Manufacturer and Model Number: (1) Hydromatic Pump Co., Model SB3S\n5 (2) Barnes\n6 (3) Or approved equal\n7 Service Conditions\n8 Liquid Pumped (Material and Percent): Leachate from low-level radioactive waste disposal facility and\n9 rain/snow melt\n10 Pumping Temperature (Fahrenheit): Normal: 55 Max: 130 Min: 27\n11 Specific Gravity at 60 Degrees F: 1.0 Viscosity Range: N/A pH: 5.0-9.3\n12 Abrasive (Y/N): (fine/coarse soil particles) Possible Scale Buildup (Y/N): Y\n13 Total suspended solids (mg/L): 200 (estimated)\n14 Largest diameter solid pump can pass (inches): 0.5\n15 Performance Requirements\n16 Capacity (US gpm): Rated: 250\n17 Total Dynamic Head (Ft): Rated: 19\n18 Maximum Shutoff Pressure (Ft): 50\n19 Min. Rated Pump Hydraulic Efficiency at Rated Capacity (%): 50\n20 Max. Pump Speed at Rated Capacity (rpm): 1,70\n21 Constant (Y/N): Y Adjustable (Y/N): N\n22 Design and Materials\n23 Pump Type: Heavy-Duty Nonclog (Y/N) Y\n24 Volute Material: Cast Iron ASTM A48\n25 Pump Casing Material: Cast Iron ASTM A48\n26 Motor Housing Material: Cast Iron ASTM A48\n27 Induction Drive Motor\n28 Horsepower: 0.30 Voltage: 460 Phase: 3 Speed (rpm): _1_70\n29 Service Factor: 1.15 Inverter Duty (Y/N): N\n30 Motor nameplate horsepower shall not be exceeded at any head-capacity point on the pump curve.\n31 Enclosure: Explosion-proof, submersible, Class 1, Div. I or Div. 2, Groups C and D\n32\nAppendix 4A.2.18\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 11305-02 -Sump Pump Data Sheet\n2 Tag Numbers: 219A-LH-P-205, 219E-LH-P-205\n3 Pump Locations and I.D.: Buildings 219A and 219E. Floor Sump\n4 Manufacturer and Model Number: (1) Hydromatic Pump Co.\n5 (2) Barnes\n6 Service Conditions\n7 Liquid Pumped: Leachate from low-level radioactive waste disposal facility\n8 Pumping Temperature (Fahrenheit): Normal: 55 Max: 130 Min: 27\n9 Specific Gravity at 60 Degrees F: 1.0 Viscosity Range: N/A pH: 5-9.3\n10 Abrasive (Y/N): Y (fine/coarse soil particles) Possible Scale Buildup (Y/N): Y\n11 Total suspended solids (mg/L): 200 (estimated)\n12 Largest diameter solid pump can pass (inches): 0.5\n13 Performance Requirements\n14 Capacity (US gpm): Rated: 28\n15 Total Dynamic Head (Ft): Rated: 14\n16 Maximum Shutoff Pressure (Ft): 30\n17 Min. Rated Pump Hydraulic Efficiency at Rated Capacity (%): 45\n18 Max. Pump Speed at Rated Capacity (rpm): 1,750\n19 Constant (Y/N): _ (Y/N):\n20 Design and Materials\n21 Pump Type: Heavy-Duty Nonclog (Y/N): Y\n22 Volute Material: Cast Iron ASTM A48\n23 Pump Casing Material: Cast Iron ASTM A48\n24 Motor Housing Material: Cast Iron ASTM A48\n25 Induction Drive Motor\n26 Horsepower: 0.30 Voltage: 460 Phase: 3 Speed (rpm): 1750\n27 Service Factor: 1.15 Inverter Duty (YIN): N\n28 Motor nameplate horsepower shall not be exceeded at any head-capacity point on the pump curve.\n29 Enclosure: Submersible\nAppendix 4A.2.19\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 11306-01 -Leachate Pump Data Sheet\n2 Tag Numbers: 219A-LH-P-202, 219E-LH-P-202\n3 Pump Locations and I.D.: Cell 1 LCRS Sump, Low Flow\n4 Cell 2 LCRS Sump, Low Flow\n5 Manufacturer and Model Number: (1) EPG Companies; Model WSD 3-3\n6 (2) Or equal\n7 Service Conditions\n8 Liquid Pumped (Material and Percent): Leachate from low-level radioactive waste landfill\n9 Pumping Temperature (Fahrenheit): Normal: 55 F Max: 130 F Min: 27 F\n10 Specific Gravity at 60 Degrees F: 1.0 Viscosity Range: NA pH: 5.0-9.3\n11 Abrasive (YIN): Y (infrequent fine soil particles) Possible Scale Buildup (Y/N): Y\n12 Total Suspended Solids (mg/1): 200 (estimated)\n13 Performance Requirements at Primary Design Point\n14 Capacity (US gpm): Rated: 13\n15 Total Dynamic Head (Ft): Rated: 66\n16 Min. Hydraulic Efficiency (%): 60\n17 Maximum Shutoff Pressure (Ft): 90\n18 Max. Pump Speed at Design Point (rpm): 3450\n19 Constant (Y/N): Y Adjustable (Y/N): N\n20\n21\nAppendix 4A.2.20\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Design and Materials\n2 Design: Wheeled enclosure frame Back Pullout (Y/N): Y\n3 Discharge Orientation: Center\n4 Casing Materials: Type 304 SST\n5 Case Wear Ring (Y/N): NA Material: NA\n6 Impeller: Type: Closed Material: Type 304 SST\n7 Impeller Wear Ring (Y/N): Y Material: E-Glide (engineered plastic) or equal\n8 Shaft Material: Type 304 SST Shaft Sleeve Material: B-Glide or equal\n9 Shaft Seal: Y Ring Material: E-Glide or equal Lubrication: Fluid\n10 AFBMA B-10 Bearing Life (Hrs): NA Lubrication: NA\n11 Drive Type: Direct Coupled\n12 Induction Drive Motor\n13 Horsepower: 0.5 Voltage: 460 Phase: 3\n14 Speed (rpm): 3,50\n15 Service Factor: 1.15 Inverter Duty (YIN): N\n16 Motor nameplate horsepower shall not be exceeded at any head-capacity point on the pump curve.\n17 Enclosure: Submersible\n18\n19\nAppendix 4A.2.21\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 11306-02 -Leachate Pump Data Sheet\n2 Tag Numbers: 219A-LH-P-203, 219E-LH-P-203\n3 Pump Location and I.D.: Cell I LCRS Sump, High Flow\n4 Cell 2 LCRS Sump, High Flow\n5 Manufacturer and Model Number: (1) EPG Companies; Model WSD 30-4\n6 (2) Or equal\n7 Service Conditions\n8 Liquid Pumped (Material and Percent): Leachate from low-level radioactive waste landfill\n9 Pumping Temperature (Fahrenheit): Normal: 55 F Max: 130 F Min: 27 F\n10 Specific Gravity at 60 Degrees F: 1.0 Viscosity Range: NA pH: 5.0-9.3\n11 Abrasive (Y/N): Y (infrequent fine soil particles) Possible Scale Buildup (Y/N): Y\n12 Total Suspended Solids (mg/1): 200 (estimated)\n13 Performance Requirements at Primary Desiqn Point\n14 Capacity (US gpm): Rated: 155\n15 Total Dynamic Head (Ft): Rated: 118\n16 Min. Hydraulic Efficiency (%): 60\n17 Maximum Shutoff Pressure (Ft): 208\n18 Max. Pump Speed at Design Point (rpm): 3,450\n19 Constant (Y/N): Y Adjustable (Y/N): N\n20\nAppendix 4A.2.22\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Design and Materials\n2 Design: Wheeled enclosure frame (Y/N): Y\n3 Discharge Orientation: Center\n4 Casing Materials: Type 304 SST\n5 Case Wear Ring (Y/N): NA Material: NA\n6 Impeller: Type: Closed Material: Type 304 SST\n7 Impeller Wear Ring (Y/N): Y Material: E-Glide (engineered plastic), or equal\n8 Shaft Material: Type 304 SST Shaft Sleeve Material: E-Glide (engineered plastic), or\n9 eMual\n10 Shaft Seal: Y Ring Material: E-Glide or equal Lubrication: Fluid\n11 AFBMA B-10 Bearing Life (Hrs): NA Lubrication: NA\n12 Drive Type: Direct Coupled\n13 Induction Drive Motor\n14 Horsepower: 7.5 Voltage: 460 Phase: 3\n15 Speed (rpm): 3450\n16 Service Factor: 1.15 Inverter Duty (Y/N): N\n17 Motor nameplate horsepower shall not be exceeded at any head-capacity point on the pump curve.\n18 Enclosure: Submersible\n19\n20\nAppendix 4A.2.23\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 11306-03 -Leachate Pump Data Sheet\n2 Tag Numbers: 219A-LH-P-204, 219E-LH-P-204\n3 Pump Locations and I.D.: Cell I LDS Sump\n4 Cell 2 LDS Sump\n5 Manufacturer and Model Number: (1) EPG Companies Model WSD 1.5-3\n6 (2) Or equal\n7 Service Conditions\n8 Liquid Pumped (Material and Percent): Leachate from low-level radioactive waste landfill\n9 Pumping Temperature (Fahrenheit): Normal: 55 F Max: 130 F Min: 27 F\n10 Specific Gravity at 60 Degrees F: 1.0 Viscosity Range: NA pH: 5.0-9.3\n11 Abrasive (Y/N) Y (infrequent fine soil particles) Possible Scale Buildup (Y/N): Y\n12 Total Suspended Solids (mg/1): 200 (estimated)\n13 Performance Requirements at Primary Design Point\n14 Capacity (US gpm): Rated: 4\n15 Total Dynamic Head (Ft): Rated: 65\n16 Min. Hydraulic Efficiency (%): 60\n17 Maximum Shutoff Pressure (Ft): 80\n18 Max. Pump Speed at Design Point (rpm): _;50\n19 Constant (Y/N): Y Adjustable (Y/N): N\n20 Design and Materials\n21 Design: Wheeled enclosure frame Back Pullout (Y/N): Y\n22 Discharge Orientation: Center\n23 Casing Materials: Type 304 SST\n24 Case Wear Ring (Y/N): NA Material: NA\n25 Impeller: Type: Closed Material: Type 304 SST\n26 Impeller Wear Ring (Y/N): Y Material: E-Glide (engineered plastic) or equal\n27 Shaft Material: Type 304 SST Shaft Sleeve Material: E-Glide or equal\n28 Shaft Seal: Y Ring Material: E-Glide or equal Lubrication: Fluid\n29 AFBMA B-10 Bearing Life (Hrs): NA Lubrication: NA\n30 Drive Type: Direct Coupled\n31 Induction Drive Motor\n32 Horsepower: 0.5 Voltage: 460 Phase: 3\n33 Speed (rpm): 30\n34 Service Factor: 1.15 Inverter Duty (Y/N): N\n35 Motor nameplate horsepower shall not be exceeded at any head-capacity point on the pump curve.\n36 Enclosure: Submersible\nAppendix 4A.2.24\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 11312-01 -Horizontal End Suction Centrifugal Pump Data Sheet\n2 Tag Numbers:\n3 Pump Name:\n4 Manufacturer and Model Number: (1)\n5 (2)\n6 Service Conditions:\n7 Liquid Pumped (Material and Percent):\n8 Pumping Temperature (Fahrenheit): Normal: 55 Max: 130 Min: 27\n9 Specific Gravity at 60 Degrees F: 1.0 Viscosity Range: N/A pH: 5.0-9.3\n10 Abrasive (Y/N): Y (fine soil particles) Possible Scale Buildup (YN): Y\n11 Total suspended solids (mg/L): 200 (estimated)\n12 Largest diameter solid pump can pass (inches): .25\n13 Performance Requirements at Primary Design Point\n14 Capacity (US gpm): Rated: 250\n15 Total Dynamic Head (Ft): Rated: 25\n16 Min. Hydraulic Efficiency (%): 75\n17 Maximum Shutoff Pressure (Ft): 40\n18 Max. Pump Speed at Design Point (rpm): 1,750\n19 Constant (Y/N): Y Adjustable (Y/N): N\n20 Design and Materials\n21 ANSI (Y/N): Y Standard (Y/N): Y Design: Frame-mounted (Y/N): Y\n22 Close-Coupled Casing (Y/N): N Back Pullout (Y/N): Y\n23 Discharge Orientation: 12:00 Rotation (view from end coupling): CW\n24 Shaft Seal: Packing (Y/N): N\n25 Mechanical (Y/N):\n26 Lubrication: Process Water\n27 Drive Type: Direct-Coupled: Belt Adjustable Speed\n28 Induction Drive Motor\n29 Horsepower: Voltage: Phase: Speed (rpm): 175\n30 Service Factor: 1.15 Inverter Duty (Y/N):\n31 Motor nameplate horsepower shall not be exceeded at any head-capacity point on the pump curve.\n32 Enclosure: Totally enclosed fan cooled\n33 Mounting Type: Horizontal Nonreverse Ratchet (Y/N):\n34 Testing\n35 Pump Tests: Factory Functional (Y/N): Field Performance (Y/N): N\n36 Factory Hydrostatic Casing Pressure Test (Y/N):\n37 Field Functional (Y/N): - Field Performance (Y/N):\n38 Field Vibration (Y/N): N\nAppendix 4A.2.25\n I\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nAPPENDIX 4A -SECTION 3\nCRITICAL SYSTEMS DESIGN DRAWINGS\nAppendix 4A.3.i\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\n6\nAppendix 4A.3.ii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n2 APPENDIX 4A -SECTION 3\n3 CRITICAL SYSTEMS DESIGN DRAWINGS\n4\n5 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n6 Drawing 1. H-2-830828, Sheet I.................................................5\n7 Drawing 2. H-2-830832 ............................................................ 6\n8 Drawing 3. H-2-830836 ............................................................ 7\n9 Drawing 4. H-2-830837......................................................8\n10 Drawing 5. H-2-830838......................................................9\n11 Drawing 6. H-2-830839......................................................10\n12 Drawing 7. H-2-830840......................................................\n13 Drawing 8. H-2-830845......................................................12\n14 Drawing 9. H-2-830846......................................................13\n15 Drawing 10. H-2-830848.....................................................14\n16 Drawing 11. H-2-830850.....................................................15\n17 Drawing 12. H-2-830854, Sheet 1................................................16\n18 Drawing 13. H-2-830854, Sheet 2................................................17\n19 Drawing 14. H-2-830869..................................................... 18\n20 Drawings redacted in electronic version. These documents may be viewed by appointment\n21 (509-372-7920) at the Washington State Department of Ecology Richland Office Library,\n22 3 100 Port of Benton Boulevard, Richland, Washington.\n23\nAppendix 4A.3.iii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAppendix 4A.3.iv\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nCO <\njo, al It, im IkI\nN 7- - 7--f\nj\nIt\nAj\n~ ~ 4\n------------- ~---f!\nDrwn .H28388 he\nAppendi 4A3.\n 8 7 I 6 54 I3 I1 oo~oo ~io\n20 .20 1. UCNEM N M 2-3M 9 -2-MM\nL M F5*PIM LAMM AN OPIFAM LAlft 000*002\n71r -M NMT S 1. E9( C1N.A ILL NE 14-2.400. 14-2-4W3\nAce L M\"7E 2-6311114 M0 LR LM & KM0 WIN9RM\nII\n700I I 700\nC-SSECTION c\nSr 00 L ltM OWNW AXA UO l\n>T O ! J 'ACm m 7\n'0 ~920 900.\nCELL I 14N' CELL 2\n920 140' l 270' 27G' 272.9' 141.9' 920\n7.0 - Ia 700\n0 7Q -- s- ml I\n70o B 7\nj TION r\n120(IN\nU.!PRTMENT OF ENERGY A -\nGRADING AND DRAINAGE\nMC)1200 1271- -2-830832b\n7___ 6- 5/ 300m\n0 0o\n o ~ ~ ~ 1 GWES WMRE MERM RMS A EME R8 1765 03l 4 .2Mou LS SA AR n.SELSSA\nA.5. EPRTET OF ENERY D\nC50725 lSAELL A N D 2ARo .v m -PRIMAR2 YE EE I NR- A N\n0--ES 46AR M MAR28AE R'R\n-o EI m AAounNARwr ., 3 \" 2EAAcE on -2-830836S FAO FT REEDE E -1E0D\n.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .o ..R ..... ........ MRC WE M-/ER FAR '3~ ~ ~ ~ ~E -. MAT .EAS RE REST EDEoAEFRSME DGEOO 02LT AR ER O\n4. C\n(0D\nWAR 2 SEE D2ATET.fEEG4A\ncooI....t.1... to\nU&PRIARTENO U ENEG PLA\nCD PRIMA RY LINER -- 0o\nA3 >0 0\n URlS SUMP PATAP10 W S\n94*1 ME0 TOP OP PMM-S 00w044004 SEE LOS SOU\nP0011P04U TOP OF 000 -~ES INI ITO AREA\nD -0. Ut ME~O 00001 L -S SUMPLW .SEE 00 I D\nSUMP4 AN 21 SUMP OR TOL 0* EM 5 1-0-0383. S-\n0139 Is op s~~~ - 0. SEE0* -0-000 SE 0 02 Ut SLOSP00101 P)\nUt LOS SOUP PARIAL P URS SUMP\nI~~~~~~U 4. SEE CS 0-20 RU SSO 249 0 O o 0LI\nso. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ L SUMPIoI 0 PUAT00sOOLO **0000800MTOA\nE02. (1SEE 2)5o tSA)00000 4sOET 0400400 100. TP0010000 PT403 40o\nff I 4 tS1 0000o *00 O O00SSO0\nI I ie OSOROC 0010t 440 00 00104sOWTO UOOTOL5-2-670*0*~~~~ GE - 04000 3EOT 01 00 1010\nI i lERS I 3.2.510 31 E 901 SU0 T 101M w 1*5 1000010 v\n-Au I M 1 II4 4004 -TI M 008 PAWOR X00OS\n0 ~ I 1500 P04110. P0.004.4. 5 SU001-0-300 SOT U tE S UP.A SEE 00.\n0* I I 5.0(1 0M 0 2 0SUMP SUP- TQ-SOP M 0 0040 01.044 0001\nI~ .70P M A M-I\nCD I I IL -- -\n0 0 Bs 2S0 -I 50- ---\nAA U..DPRTETO)EEG\nLCRS SUP PARTIA PLAN SUMP PARTIA PARIALPLA\n-i USED*\n500 4a =W\n001101 **504t 00 tOSSATOD 000400010 O s~IILI (J\n 6 I 7 6 4 -'~Im,\ncft 44. * 1\nwst I -A, Aotm. ...... i. .\n3.7W WOth 7W 'oM\"W v\\ A\n*7L7 M70.S (AW =R-,i t 0071*. -0Kh lu.in\nW4k t W4. 110M i*.D hWRo&A\nBOTTOM LINER DETAIL .1 ....... 44.07 L4l7O W,\nQ0 SIE SLOPE LINER DETAIL (7'\\\n> -4-54a .4-0.4.w \"K4\n\"0 MI\n00\n44.4440 ~ ~ ~ c '. C4'407 m7 4\n_ _ _ _ _ _ _ -4m\nC00\nuA a~ft 0\nJ,1,~~~ ur I-ww\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nK C)-\nIl ti a I~i~\n'I _____ Mz Iii\nOx\nd d a d N4\n..... .....\n25 1z\n-v,\nA I\nto~\n~i !m9\nDrawing 6. H-2-830839\nAppendix 4A.3. 10\n 8 7 6 5 4 3 Iun a 2Aces PiR ?TI\n1. H H-2- FM CR M T\nDAIAJAE PAN0 AROE OPERATORS LOTT O TH\nUNTO EM\n2. 0YERLG N SYST COMPO is NOT SHONY\nD FOR CLARry SEE SDE SLOPE UNER DETTA D\nNH ONY PEbW MEOBRAME REM S CONNECT-15TOPE To ,O a OTaHERoTo\nTE IT SENTS6 9SVnHEG 4NT XOO 8',50 XOEN 44' MI ram GET K 1/2- LESS STHVd PPI T.\nPROTECTCN K-00)IT PRTCTON KSET-2-RSR ) 4. BUM5 MASL TAPE MI NEOPSRENE PA\nLAETO WTOOM OR TOL EEC R M MtAO\n1/2\" EE 040 00SO OWT. EPE PNR\nN PNflOTE LEADING O EDGE OF GEOEMIEAN GAIST\nWAND PO UP ST MSOESO TOE\nA.SS NE 0--ORMS.NHlC TLAINACS\nPHASE 1 SOUH LINER6EDGETERUPNAT1O DETEILLOPE OPROMETOE\nPHAS1 SQTHOIER DBTERINATON TTAI\n* TOTPI(SEE NDISEPT)00SE E FCO DWGH--8364MTOT LS RSER F\nSEC MOTEECT EW\nSemuY \n.TofIE TR SEE \nSIX\n(sEE PENDcASEALSE DET026L\nTYPICALcoEOPRABRANEGEOOTMDRAAIECCTC EU a R\nD- M\nGEOYNHESC\nSDS EDECI AND DETAIL\nXO -M MT ---3MPHS ISUTsINREDETEMNAIo EAI s C o a*,,lC C*H w SECT5IONS AN DGETAL\nows~~~H PIo I DEAEEECET 0E 01N2 838L\n84- O'GEDREERMN -P-\n 5 4 3 F E~~2M A p;.1.1\nLASNAE SLEEA 12M LESA&LLET\nI9A- STEILC'-AELE PH-Hl SE ELEVATIONSEE'o 4 1 MEE ELMAC ELSE DACR\nSOW ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P a,~T w.T1 AL-TEAEHW A LSLN tEEAE ES EED~ ,t.APA L LSSAV E\nSEA Y' l -TrJ IL ELA 1.p R-E.-8AAE\n.~~~~6 AT j/ T 'A R ACE T A TE\nSEE SALL LL M' ETNLLLEL\nALAL~.. . EA.. .-.. , ........ . ALV T\nL~ EEM ELEAEL\"-- - - - --/AA\nA'R so /\nALASLA 105 PT AE J1SEE OTESLAAILIEEAE r AW LEF SATALIT \\ ' SETALEE ~ LAELE\nEPLTC LALIO 1- PAAT\n]!I i. .KJJ'\nA 7 C 5-- EA IA A SE EL S SRM TATESSIS .\n_ ALL -,L EELL TOICTAEHOLTC W\nAn E-T. -' -AEA -EA -WL A- -LEA T- --A--S P- -EA ALAAE 02 ELE L-- -----~ k.~A S HO\n2;U SME ;2- A EA rLL STL4 A ME-A oE S ~ l A A T T T CE\nff:CA POE OLNELT-E si E f.\nAPELEELSS ATA TMLE.SS E~tSASEES i APASES NELI MSS EESS.AEELT LE'LAMPM EA AC (504MA CHE ATI CtLS 1&'\n44 -- Ln=HT COLLECTIO&AMt AE.M PIIN PA 2IL EEMR RC - i t - ET 804\nOLE EN TEAEEEAE .' ...., r ,-CL\n__ __ __ _ __ __ _ __ __ __ _ __ __ _ __ __ __ _ __ __ _ __ __ __ _ __ __ _ vA0A3HE U T\nTo.~~ O'TS &4' I OPT -EIY2. L, 1 SF- ........ .\n 8764 3 I XT~ M---6MO 11 C 11\n-08'0 6 5'07m e 2 .38a i .\n21N01--LT-OI-ROP P l~PPSHW XS*16 SOLID LINES NORTH OP CREST PQI BLEG\nSEE NOLLMOO DEAIL (T\"P 18 PLACES) 2 1E- LN-03-HDPE INCXTE NU BIED 0 C TN LED NTE PIPING ORM\n\"--2-67 D~ar coI.NM.ESN -- R PIPIND,\n-- - INO-,LC -D-RO 21EI*LCPO-OOPE , SECO OIP CONTANNENT SYTU\nS* 3 R 2iNE I- NG D MLOPE *3. SLOPE AW PIPING IN DIRECTON I-NCATED AT 1% SLOPE D\n-121301 -C-T-O4 OE MINIMUM CT PRIMARY11 PIPE RCO EN S. SEE P&IDS\nUIO-C-LT-OAT-TOPE 219E1-C:LT-OL-HGPE ON N -2-308S4, SOEETS 1 THRO0GH04\nDATfLT037 HOPE NjE'6G CUNST1NT 4 -ITL HOPE COP ON -ER PIPE MOO FIXED £30 SEL\n/8OR SECOMOT CONNANMENT PIPE. TOIS PIPE IS\n>P03000 FON FUTURE PUMP1 SUCTION CONNECTION TO\ni -3-- Fo-DIrRSUSEELNO FUTURE ACMTE STORACE TANK\n21 13-Lu DPE CORD ED OF PIE ORE NURAL N STALL N P C ON C A ER PIPE -DD FEDD SEAL/ CUTH O DE UTR RRCOND EOE RD P01 60\nW/-CNTIMN FOR SECONJOAR COMOINMENT PIPE R.IS PIPE IS\nSE OESEE NW4CONNECTION TO FLITRE LEACIIETE STORMGEAMD\nTW l.SEE(I-.F L RANS s-6 SEEI 0*0 H-2-29,OM SAT 2 FOR LAUWT HANOLMO\n106015 OLUCTD3-HP P100ME SUROE COSNOL POINT& FOR CELL I FRUEITES CONAROL\n9E2 1A-4-L-T-0SD-HDPE A-DMORE PONTS. REPLC~ E IT0; FOR CELL 2 FRULIOEIS CONTNGL POINTS.\n21-0-2'LTC-O36HUP 2- -2'EDAMPTEHD CEILL A S IS\nS NOTE 2 7 US NOT BE LESS N LowED PIPE\n21. 1 N 4--LI 5-RDPE - TOE OF GRAVEL PAS E S E LOECON SHONN FO F -A ED\nM/8 N TANMEN DISCRETE LEVL NNSTEUMENNTTIOTL\nSEE( 9 FLOATIC TC R PUMP EAN A L E RE\nC-- ONIN 51 SMAL BE INSDTO PEN NAD I EROFU E REQUIEMEIINTS\n\"fl DI TOE LOAION SHIOWN, THIS POMP SHAL RE OPERATED XS NEONT\nTR MINIMIZE DEPTT O F Ao NSwArLLT cUMLT ON TOP\n0 OF FLONTING COVER.\n10I PIPING DES INAMTNS MOE IDNTED FON CETL 1 CEL 2\nLI03 PIPEUNES TE '21BX PRERX IS FO CEL- 1 -THE\n2j:X1-5\"-LNH0O-HDPE 1'SH .OVNTW D RWWW 11 219E PREFIX IS FAR CELL 2\nsE NON PIPING oOR OF CNEST P^ BUILDING ICLOOISC\nMOM3 -PIPING EXCEPT PoN 2MUER sITMAN OTE AE U\nAI1. INSHIN 1 SW LDS SEE PE EII I M E OF ELD G\n2001 -2E 3-- 124--E NE EOPE PS\n2AIUCF 1-22-LIP-035-OTE\n8I2 7W I35 6 \" \"E\nc.oo0+0B ROE OF ABESRD 01\n112-_4 ITI OD EMN\nCOTTP) SEE(> TSEE NROTR (R6 OF2-1-1\nSEEE DM5T SEEMMRO -E,1> TOP OF 2)16 ROI ISLJ,\n(_, 1M -1\nPIUE PIE OTTIUVO C42IH\nA~N2804 I-3- SLUM 2SR PIPE OF SHINE0 BERMPRUrO NEG\nTor FOR~ECHT TRANSFERCAION1-REF~ ~ ~~~~ \nR\" NUBR RUP \nM' \n3 IIGPA0MG ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E MN TIE-E2-MON N302-384 o-\nMMT6 NA*LTOR MD UE RROSRI '08~~S C 7NI 41MN PIPE o\nFOR~G 0IEN\nNAME0\n Alt2 I. I\n~~~~~ -m 2 2.22 2\n(A)4.1 :22.21 \n2. 2224 W2 \n21\nQ41.2 II4221 I4222224 21\nco2 225 4 '2222 .F2*.222 2 2214122\n.0b B 4t224 21 242.4.432, 3 22224 22 t.22 ~ 2(2,-L1I 2\n42 I .242\n2~A ..2 .4110 ...\n2 .4212 ......\n( .............. 2422 F\nA. 4'2<224 U.S.222.2 DEPARTMENT2424 OF E4EG A 22\nL2 p222242 S F r1 s 9113. C> 2\n22.42~~~ ~~ ....... Q42 >.. ,...,4 .2 .1 2 * 2 .\n2.422~~~~~~~~( 002 42 22.2 24123 2.2\n 8 7 6 5 4 3 [ni -000 1\n7-0 PREOS SAINES SSSLTS UINER PTOTECS1ON PUTE R ,-\nVAL 0A'ACS RAOO AL ACCESS CSSITT AA BORED TO CONCEA NOSj TI I LCS(E ~O1)DUNENMuTO\n.Bc. A-.KNEROU.- STRUT PAT IAUT UD. PROSDE KMB A/*X212 S IT OHSDSO ITN\nSPOTORSOUP CUBIC HE OF DA- ROCK AT .RONO FLUSU TA NJT\nCONREE RNDCOS O F GETEATL\nFILULER NJ. ABOUNOLE 210\nSEE(a E, 70 'INSL TW COMPONENTA_2__O1A ST A 2'-0' TAP mK --AL SEA\"T COOILOISO ALLSCVK F2-5H3x 'x\nHOPE S P - 76-~~~~~TO.A. N RT.S\"i.D. AROUND. FORMI ~LOD oFrYE34STPP BUE OCEEP\nTANX POLTTJRETHINE Aa TOP SOANGSPE ALEMINIUJO .,' CU , /_ STOMER\nFO-AD PIPE00DR-RP INI o' A-V2 TAPE, , RA\nTAH OECOTIMET I -TB , N --L-A -POP BOT C LUSHO RP\nLEAR -1 1-1 W DEETO OF D FORO8\"TAE M1/B TPE CFl,-AEA (TOP UNE PLONESRETE\nDAAi-40-UTC-0S0-HP 4' / ED ARE N AA8'AEOPE -ALCP-DSN-KDP LI.E. TiNS REDUCERT-41H\nFREE UATE A. I.E. --- 041 THOPEA PIMP -u\nCONTEE N- * 4'/B HX W/AKA-OHPEPPOSS- PMODLSAECLOTSPE\nHo LTP HP , IEUC-2 OE PO _DTE-\"A -S-DE E T N. EL IN D 5.0 APE E P~ U MPES-OCOOEE S\nC- .C- ~ NMN ..- LT L:. .B HOPE...- BED. RIAN DNAPE ALO219 VAULT UDH P W/ CES B LE E 0 20\"E 3 -40 -1 2IT SS DLB A D A 0 U\n2 : IR N UY 19 1-2-LIP-03-1DPELEACHATE TANK LEAK DETECTION PENETRATION \\\nPIP BRNOATE CA- COMBINED SUMP PAND 21AD--LTCP-OA4-E\nPUER .C A\n>THICKNESS(TYP) 21TAE-AR-P-2SOTILRSO EL - HIDPAETNA-O- LOO 00 DO AINM- DR LO TAS-oa~ asuR -o AROUsNDE rAE oFU G\nCD 2 :29Et-2 -32-HDPE IE 714 2 ,0 H -\"LC-4-D _ T ImDPE FAou LECH 4 D u s\n2 TEo /-cLTCPo5aPE 2 E 2E 1 2 0-2LO -ROP0HDPE NEOPRENE RUBBED =2ET\nL2E TORN SEE SORE A (C:P) PLACES SEE NO E TTER L\n* \"\"o0\"50'1 A SOOR oE T 2I DPESRTDHD R PPSJD FUIS TSTOCK. CUTSHOLEPm\nX 219M 01-2 -L D6- HD / SQE / STUS MBE N N RE D FMRTO IERTU KS -A M ,HO E D U LP21E0T- PCES SSE NOTE AECO3T)M PI\n>M ETTRUSION BLE BOA TO TSTSTOCR\nPRVDE -lI I PE NIL AMOUND (PO A PLACES)\nCT LPE CONTPER R F E FP CM E UPI\nPREECOBMENDCTTONS. (TUP OF NE TOLEGA\nPE STU 11P CUMN HOEO FjTTLE U HUPA MCI -LT-DA -ROPE SLSTOAA NEEDED FOR CARRIER\n2 G/ .ROPE FD EX EE NA CEINnE PiPE TO RE INSERTED WIO F E NE G FT.\nA CER 1MD THE 21BE\" PE~x is OR CER .NTS 0 21804 WEDE TOTHOTRE ST E NOUEI Eo r o-s D.0.0CR PIPE LEC10 IA\nB 'U OINER .R2 1~ \"2ALA FOR POTSEA B\nOBSSE 0So0. AND PRI , S T S DANER\nCOMBINED SU P RREC|Tu NET SFTDNDTN R.E H -2 -8 3 0 8ATAAAD-4LR-N5O-APE 27lP 110 I M (SEE NOTE 21, CO)DISCS/AE USNE CUSTION III LATI LUBRCAB\nO 2 1 -A\"N- -.D PE (SE NOT 3)I\n7; BH OPE COSTIUNMEST IFII OAB R PUPIAL IP TRSO SU RBS\n1.1. 7100TE SUCTION USE BECOSARMY. OL AR00UN0\nHPC SOODOTOTS. CUSHIN UCOOTBILO\nMA;-2-LRLP-OSA-RDPE\n700. -1ECONDRT LINER P1 D\n1.OT ISKTAL R E 0/0- TICKESS\n1/1 35-A0 DUROMETER HARDNESS.\nTOOF TO0t POLNRETRNE EUSOER BO\nISTLL A RC110 ABOUND ACCESS TA\"O. ANISUTUBSE ABE. PIPE SUOTRS STALL LEACHATE TANK WALL PENETRTO (U\\\nCONOECI TO SRBALPAR T.-K2OS.SA CH2MHILL\nA. PIPISO AND EQUIPMENT LESIUNATIANS MRE IDENTEE M IED SU P ANH LEAT BRAU-FAUAS REQUIREMENTS.\nA FOR CELL I AND CEU. 0 THE \"21BD PREFIA IS FOR 4,TN IE SU P M N O ESTO RBSED FACE SUP-OS FLANES SOAILL BF NAME ,.D AR EN OFEEGCL1ADTH'IB'PEilSFRCLL2 N7H- 46DTOHEHI STRE KDOU-ID\nS BNOO SOBOOR ANGLES AND TRIER EIUATAONS POPES. CN. ONM\nSTAL_ RE DEAR OVERIFIED PRIOR TO FARIATON OF D\n4RBLISTANCE .RED TO BUTT D\nEASE 01 FIELDU S.0%IW10N D D T L\n.PRVDE ELSION REAED OUSSETEU, STOP SETIN NANDA DETAILS\nNO CE/U EDS.UON OC ONETOS ;E. D2-000 830850 TEDARIUBTED1HE.C IE0TRSO COSEOTSS BAN it - D01 wEAEEE NO IEAELSNO\" T R UFOF N NESSF USESD AN fyREP~onLAS- ~\n8 7 6 5 t4 3 2N *\"N*\n010? anw.. ranessur sr tm uco o )e avuouss w enro A ,0 o a\n 8 7 654I3 I-N ISR H2SOSS P48\n0\nCONTROL PANEL PLC PROCESSOR ASD 1/O MRODLLES AE-SO-E\n0\nSTEMPE\n\"I C(4.\n* 0U+CONRO PNE5PC ROESSRPND1/CMDUES2CTAE cS ol0310 TlSPRCS IT0ERTOOCTA CSTAS(S)OSESS1 A80.50\n00\n'-4.'-so srF ouos s s u ss t sy ss sc ncc o sa au u eN Ec\n2C i-o 1-2w\n00 000S -Au\ns8u 0o R2 W. A 2 5 2 FO2 - D 0enU 2021o 2o\nSTAIROC ID EFE MRI SO ISTTTSAOIl0 CX- .-5PIR ING, T TE POMERTS ON2THISA 00 ROE2-,I - ne I NT r= .N.2 v- 1e\n450 7 -- ~ 50.1 FPMRO CRE T PR O .- SEEIN SITS 1--8 AND~s N-\nIT P1 I '11- H- -E ) -D -R C 2 HIL AND2-c-o-7 - OTNER TIC-a-ooze. sTr 2 Po P L1c.NO TO ON\n27o - s A e c smcs ~ru~rnwcwmtssrs(c)FRDsa o F sto\nv soEnsCELL #1 21I o\nUCP o wRIS SUMSn SEEtaSOMBER TITLEu sE s-s --7 ES 220 002--2-one0 54.72 n~ 1sonc-e CREST PAD BUILDING 219A 0J\n585 S O CRPS SEEERA \"NI- U 00 CCH2 HILL\no7 rac sssc e E-20s) U ARTNT OENERGY A\nIDN\nQ~ -\"---------.----------- CELL #1 P&ID\ns-com Oreno NO. owRoI wr e u E EREEae s I--,FD2 F&\"-2-83085416\n8 7 6 5 4 . 2\n0\n 8 7 6 5 -4 JI ID H -2- 54 IN\nCONTROL PANEL PLC PROCESSOR AND 1/0 MODULES 10C-TOl\n* I T~N-OONN OC (OP\n(SEESNAON\n12.o IN CAEST PI 4\nP' IN\nI I OTOI NLT AT ope lN~-CO-TOOO3S-OOT ~24TO\n~~-V\nITA.~~~~1 4-i-7HP Ilo- CTOOAOO ~j\n- 2-\n12.\nE11Y---.rHOE AU. TN . ONT 00 H 2 8 0 NWNi-c NA, RACE NETONNOA --- - A-o4.ODOIN TAOEBIIR UR4ETlNNOA AII\n6~ 7 6 5 4 3 TNI 2 I PC\nB0 B\n 8 |7 6 5 4 3| A W-2-esORRC AT or I , 1\nRFI- 156\n1/2\" CG8 F)TTING\nBELL ROX WITH GASKEED BLANK CAGR\nGROUND WiRE FOR TESTING\nD FOUNDATIONGEOTE-LE ALONG WALL AND FLUO R\nFLAING COAR\n-- SECONDARY CONAINENT TANK\nPI TKLINER AL ONG W L AN D F LUR\n10-RFI -156 CUSHION GEOTExTILE\nNI I 1V GROUT\nSEE -1 C CO DAINAGE NET\nPF OSU T AONATESSE \n212TOP OF RING WALL ELLA 722O\n12' MIN STRCTU- FILL\n-FOUND ATI CHR\n, BOLT DESGED By\n6\" MIN STRUCTURAL FILL\nS6' MIN STRUTUR FILL\nBED COR NK WETH 0o 16\" CLOSED HOOPS\nFA No N RDSGNED\nI 47 12- EF. COOT\nNOTES\nFLOOR AND ROOF PLAN A ETER T T--K\n3/32-=1 -0- A FOR 219001 & 219E201 -CLLLLORLUAIIONS\n2 FOR LEOE.TE TNK PIPE -0 ~PENETRATION, SEE 71 n'\nC B H-2-O8 1660 B\n3 CONCRETE STRENGTH MIN 4000 P COMPRESSB No\n(D (LC S 40) 0 2K DAYS\nREINFORCING STEEL ASTu 615. GRADE 60\nSOR BOILT CORDINATES GAO BE FOUND IN IDF DETAIL\nPROJECT A o423. SUPPLEuENT 7 1-1o\n2 SLOPE TO CENTER 2% SLOPE TO CENTER\nSECTIN ANSM U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY\nLEACHATE TANK FOUNDATION\nBo 0 CN-72390RS PLAN, SECTION & DETAIL\nkKrK02BKR RRL1-A2 - 8\nD w o mL T A OA RE ERRIES R--sAm.. -2\nOn 00\n7~~( 6 c43C)B *O\nA ' ~\n I\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2 APPENDIX 4B\n3 1 DETAILED DESIGN CELL 1 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN\n4\n5\n6\nAppendix 4B.i\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\n6\nAppendix 4B.ii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n2 APPENDIX 4B\n3 DETAILED DESIGN CELL 1 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN\n4\n5 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n6 ACRONYMS .................................................................. viii\n7 SECTION 1 GENERAL ......................................................... 9\n8 1.1 Introduction ......................................................... 9\n9 1.1.1 Applicable Units .... ....................................................... 9\n10 1.1.2 Scope.... ......................................................... 9\n11 1.2 Project Organization........................................................9\n12 1.2.1 Responsibility and Authority..................................................9\n13 1.2.2 Project Meetings...........................................................13\n14 1.2.3 HoldPoints .............................................................. 15\n15 1.3 Personnel Qualifications and Training........................................... 15\n16 1.3.1 CQA Certifying Engineer.................................................... 15\n17 1.3.2 CQA Monitor....................................................... 15\n18 1.3.3 Field Inspector...................................................... 16\n19 1.3.4 Soils Laboratory Technicians................................................. 16\n20 1.3.5 Geosynthetic Laboratory ................................................. 16\n21 1.4 Definitions Relating to Construction Quality Assurance ..................... ......... 16\n22 1.4.1 Construction Quality Assurance and Construction Quality Control ............. ....... 16\n23 1.4.2 Use of the Terms in This Plan............................................ 17\n24 1.5 References ......................................................... 17\n25 1.5.1 Applicable Organizations................................................. 17\n26 1.5.2 Applicable Standards o.Construction.Quality.e.......................... ............................. 17\n27 1.6 Construction Activities and Submittal Requirements ...................... ....... 17\n28 1.6.1 Construction Activities ................................................... 17\n29 1.6.2 Submittal Requirements ................................................ 18\n30 1.6.3 Receipt Inspection Procedures...... ........ .................... ......... 18\n31 SECTION 2 SOILS CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE......................22\n32 2.1 Fill Placement and Subgrade Preparation.....................................22\n33 2.1.1 Fill Placement and Compaction...........................................22\n34 2.1.2 Construction Quality Assurance Evaluation...................................22\n35 2.2 Prepared Subgrade.................................................... 23\n36 2.2.1 Layer Completion Certification........................................... 24\nAppendix 4B.iii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 2.3 Soil Bentonite Admix Liner and Test Pads ....................... ................... 24\n2 2.3.1 Test Pads...... .................................................... 24\n3 2.3.1.1 Construction Quality Assurance Evaluation. ......................... ........ 24\n4 2.3.2 Soil Bentonite Admix Liner ............................................. 25\n5 2.3.2.1 Construction Quality Assurance Evaluation ..................... ............... 25\n6 2.3.2.2 Layer Completion Certification .............................................. 28\n7 2.4 Drain Gravel ........................................................ 29\n8 2.4.1 Conformance Evaluation ...................... ................ 29\n9 2.4.2 Placement and Compaction....................................... ........ 29\n10 2.4.3 Construction Quality Assurance Evaluation ................................... 29\n11 2.4.4 Layer Completion Certification .................... ............... 29\n12 2.5 Operations Layer.....................................................30\n13 2.5.1 Conformance Evaluation ......................... ................ 30\n14 2.5.2 Layer Completion Certification ........................................... 30\n15 2.6 Soil Surveying.......................................................31\n16 SECTION 3 GEOSYNTHETIC CLAY LINER CONSTRUCTION QUALITY\n17 ASSURANCE ................................................... 36\n18 3.1 Geosynthetic Clay Liner Manufacture and Delivery .............................. 36\n19 3.1.1 Labeling ........................................................... 36\n20 3.1.2 Transportation and Handling ....................................... ......36\n21 3.1.3 Storage................ ................................................. 36\n22 3.1.4 Inventory .......................................................... 36\n23 3.1.5 Quality Assurance Conformance Testing .............................. ........ 37\n24 3.2 Geosynthetic Clay Liner Installation .............................. .......... 38\n25 3.2.1 Surface Preparation ................................................... 38\n26 3.2.2 Anchor Trenches and Sumps...............................................38\n27 3.2.3 Geosynthetic Clay Liner Deployment.......................................39\n28 3.2.4 Defects and Repairs...................................................40\n29 SECTION 4 GEOMEMBRANE CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE ...... ........41\n30 4.1 Geomembrane Material ....................................... .......... 41\n31 4.1.1 Labeling ........................................................... 41\n32 4.1.2 Transportation and Handling ............................................. 41\n33 4.1.3 Storage...... ...................................................... 41\n34 4.1.4 Inventory .......................................................... 41\n35 4.1.5 Quality Assurance Conformance Testing........... ................ ............ 42\n36 4.1.6 Manufacturing Plant Site Visit............................................43\nAppendix 4B.iv\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 4.2 Installation ......................................................... 43\n2 4.2.1 Surface Preparation...................................................43\n3 4.2.2 Anchor Trenches and Sumps ............................................. 43\n4 4.2.3 Geomembrane Deployment..............................................44\n5 4.2.4 Field Seaming.......................................................45\n6 4.2.5 Defects and Repairs...................................................48\n7 4.2.6 Appurtenances......................................................49\n8 4.3 Geomembrane Panel Layout Survey........................................ 49\n9 4.4 Layer Completion Certification........................................... 49\n10 SECTION 5 GEOTEXTILE CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE ................. 50\n11 5.1 Geotextile Material And Installation........................................50\n12 5.1.1 Labeling ........................................................... 50\n13 5.1.2 Transportation and Handling............................................. 50\n14 5.1.3 Storage .............................................................. 50\n15 5.1.4 Inventory .......................................................... 50\n16 5.1.5 Conformance Testing .................................................... 51\n17 5.1.6 Deployment ........................................................ 52\n18 5.1.7 Seams and Overlaps ................................................... 52\n19 5.1.8 Repair ............................................................ 52\n20 SECTION 6 COMPOSITE DRAINAGE NET CONSTRUCTION QUALITY\n21 ASSURANCE ................................................. 53\n22 6.1 Composite Drainage Net Material and Installation ...................... ......... 53\n23 6.1.1 Labeling ........................................................... 53\n24 6.1.2 Transportation and Handling .................................... ......... 53\n25 6.1.3 Storage ............................................................ 53\n26 6.1.4 Inventory .......................................................... 53\n27 6.1.5 Conformance Testing ..................................................... 54\n28 6.1.6 Deployment ........................................................ 55\n29 6.1.7 Seams and Overlaps ................................................... 56\n30 6.1.8 Repair............................................................56\n31 SECTION 7 POLYETHYLENE PIPE AND FITTINGS CONSTRUCTION QUALITY\n32 ASSURANCE ......................................... ........ 57\n33 7.1 Pipe and Fittings ..................................................... 57\n34 7.1.1 Labeling ........................................................... 57\n35 7.1.2 Transportation and Handling ..................................... ............ 57\n36 7.1.3 Storage.. .......................................................... 57\nAppendix 4B.v\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 7.1.4 Inventory .......................................................... 57\n2 7.1.5 Conformance Testing.................. ...................... ........ 57\n3 7.1.6 Handling and Laying...................................................57\n4 7.1.7 Joints and Connections ........................................... ......58\n5 7.1.8 Surveying .......................................................... 58\n6 SECTION 8 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENTATION AND\n7 CERTIFICATION ...................................... ........ 59\n8 8.1 Documentation and Certification ..................................... ..... 59\n9 8.1.1 Daily Reports........................................................59\n10 8.1.2 Inspection Data Sheets ................................................. 60\n11 8.1.3 Record Drawing Maintenance ............................................ 60\n12 8.1.4 Non-Conformance Reporting...................... ................. 60\n13 8.1.5 Resolution of Contract Document Questions and Clarifications ......... .............61\n14 8.1.6 Construction Change Order and Contract Document Changes................ ........ 61\n15 8.1.7 Progress Reports.....................................................61\n16 8.1.8 Final Documentation and Certification.......................................62\n17 8.1.9 Storage of Records .................................................... 62\n18 8.1.10 Storage of Archive Construction Material Samples ...................... 62\n19 SECTION 9 REFERENCES ........................................... ......63\n20\n21 FIGURES\n22 Figure 1-1. QA Organization Chart .............................................. 11\n23\n24 TABLES\n25 Table 1.1. Required Submittals ................................................. 19\n26 Table 2.1. Minimum Frequency of Testing for CQA Evaluation of Earthfill ........ ...........31\n27 Table 2.2. Minimum Frequency of Testing for CQA Evaluation of Structural Fill......... .............. 31\n28 Table 2.3. Minimum Frequency of Testing for CQA Evaluation of Prepared Subgrade... ...........32\n29 Table 2.4. Test Pad Testing Methods and Minimum Frequency ........................... 33\n30 Table 2.5. Minimum Frequency of Testing for CQA Evaluation of SBL..................34\n31 Table 2.6. Maximum Allowable Percentage of Failed Tests for CQA Evaluation of SBL ................... 35\n32 Table 2.7. Minimum Frequency of Testing for CQA Evaluation of Operations Layer.........................35\n33\nAppendix 4B.vi\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nACRONYMS\nASTM American Society for Testing and Materials\nCDN Composite drainage net\nCM Construction Manager\nCQA Construction Quality Assurance\nCQC Construction Quality Control\nDOE U.S. Department of Energy\nEPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency\nGCL Geosynthetic clay liner\nGRI Geosynthetic Research Institute\nIDF Integrated Disposal Facility\nLCRS Leachate collection and removal system\nLDS Leak detection system\nNCR Non-Conformance Report\nORP Office of River Protection\nOSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration\nPM Project Manager\nQA Quality assurance\nQC Quality control\nRFI Request for Information\nSBL Soil bentonite admix liner\nSLDS Secondary leak detection system\nUCL Upper control limit\nWAC Washington Administrative Code\n2\n3\nAppendix 4B.viii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI SECTION 1 GENERAL\n2 1.1 Introduction\n3 This Construction Quality Assurance (CQA) Plan describes the quality assurance (QA) activities for\n4 constructing Phase I of the Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF) at the Hanford facility in Richland,\n5 Washington.\n6 1.1.1 Applicable Units\n7 QA activities will be required during construction of Cell I of Phase I to certify that the following\n8 construction activities are performed in accordance with the construction documents:\n9 * Construction/preparation of foundation systems for liners.\n10 * Construction of dikes or embankments.\n11 * Construction of low-permeability soil liners.\n12 * Construction of geomembranes.\n13 * Construction of leachate collection and removal systems and leak detection systems.\n14 This CQA Plan has been prepared to describe the activities that will be performed during construction of\n15 the lining system, leachate collection and leak detection systems, and operation layer of Cell 1. This\n16 CQA Plan is intended to satisfy the regulatory requirements and guidance established in 40 CFR 264.19,\n17 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) technical guidance document, Quality Assurance and\n18 Quality Control for Waste Containment Facilities (EPA 1993), and Washington Administrative Code\n19 (WAC) 173-303-335.\n20 This CQA Plan will be implemented by a CQA Officer (herein referred to as the CQA certifying\n21 engineer), a person familiar with EPA's technical guidance document, Quality Assurance and Quality\n22 Control for Waste Containment Facilities and this CQA Plan. The CQA certifying engineer will be\n23 supported by the number of CQA representatives necessary to implement the requirements in this CQA\n24 Plan and to document the work.\n25 1.1.2 Scope\n26 This CQA Plan establishes general administrative and documentation procedures that will be applicable\n27 for selected activities of construction. With respect to responsibilities, personnel qualifications, and\n28 specific inspection and testing activities, this CQA Plan addresses only those activities associated with the\n29 soils, geosynthetics, and related liner and leachate collection system piping components for the IDF.\n30 The CQA requirements are divided into the following sections to provide quick access to CQA\n31 requirements for individual liner components:\n* Soils CQA * Composite Drainage Net CQA\n* Geosynthetic Clay Liner CQA * Polyethylene Pipe and Fittings CQA\n* Geomembrane CQA * CQA Documentation and Certification\n* Geotextile CQA * CQA Documentation and Certification\n32 1.2 Project Organization\n33 This section describes the anticipated project organization for the IDF construction activities. The\n34 following subsections address the organizations involved in the construction, their respective roles in\n35 construction activities, and the methods of interactions between organizations.\n36 1.2.1 Responsibility and Authority\n37 The organization chart for the IDF construction is shown in Figure 1-1. These personnel will be\n38 associated with two main entities that include the Tank Farm operating contractor and his agents and the\n39 construction general contractor and his personnel and/or subcontractors.\nAppendix 4B.9\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI The project team consists of both full-time field personnel and part-time management personnel. The\n2 part-time management personnel will be onsite during the IDF construction periodically to monitor\n3 progress, attend meetings, resolve disputes, and ensure that the work is implemented in accordance with\n4 the construction drawings, technical specifications, CQA Plan, and the RCRA permit. The field\n5 personnel will consist of the key personnel onsite during construction. The solid lines on the organization\n6 chart represent project responsibilities such as scope, cost, and schedule. The dashed lines represent the\n7 functional responsibilities of staff for QA, design, and management. The responsibilities and reporting\n8 requirements for each project team member are described in the following sections.\n9 1.2.1.1 Project Team\n10 When the individuals identified below are designated to perform specific functions described in this CQA\n11 Plan, the reference to these individuals includes their designee or an alternate who can function on their\n12 behalf. The Department of Energy -Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) Manager is the owner's\n13 representative and is responsible for project funding and overall project scope. The DOE-ORP manager\n14 and IDF project manager keep the regulatory agencies informed of IDF construction activities and\n15 progress.\n16 1.2.1.2 IDF Project Manager (PM)\n17 The IDF PM is an employee or agent of the Tank Farm operating contractor, has overall responsibility for\n18 the IDF construction, and interfaces with the DOE-ORP manager. The IDF PM directs the activities of\n19 the IDF project and field team staff, including the CM, design engineer, and the project engineer.\n20 Additionally, the IDF PM has overall responsibility for the achievement of quality. Functionally, the\n21 IDF PM reviews and approves quality assurance reports submitted by the IDF CQA certifying engineer.\n22 1.2.1.3 IDF Project Engineer\n23 The IDF project engineer is an employee or agent of the Tank Farm operating contractor and is\n24 responsible for providing technical support to the IDF project team. The IDF project engineer is\n25 supported by the design engineer for reviewing and/or preparing technical documents related to\n26 engineering design and analyses.\n27\nAppendix 4B.10\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nDOE-ORPP\nManager\nIDF Quality IDF Project\nEngineer Maniager\nCOA Certifying IDF P roje ct Construction IDF Design\nEngineer Engneer Manager Engineer\nCOA Construction General\nM1on itor C ontracto r S ite Su perv iso r\nInspectors\nC on stru ctio n Construction\nAGeneral Su bcontractors\nContractorTechnicians Quality Control\nCOA\nS urv eyo r\n1 Figure 1-1. QA Organization Chart\n2\nAppendix 4B.11\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 1.2.1.4 IDF Quality Engineer\n2 The IDF quality engineer is an employee or agent of the Tank Farm operating contractor and is\n3 independent from line management on the project. The IDF quality engineer provides overview and\n4 assessment of QA on the project. The IDF quality engineer provides feedback and assessment results to\n5 the IDF PM.\n6 1.2.1.5 IDF Design Engineer\n7 The IDF design engineer is an employee or agent of the Tank Farm operating contractor is responsible for\n8 reviewing and/or preparing technical documents related to the IDF design and construction. The design\n9 engineer prepares the construction drawings, technical specifications, and the CQA Plan. The IDF design\n10 engineer reports to the IDF PM and supports the IDF project engineer.\n11 1.2.1.6 Field Team\n12 1.2.1.7 IDF Construction Manager\n13 The IDF CM is an employee or agent of the Tank Farm operating contractor and serves as the point of\n14 contact between the IDF construction general contractor and the IDF project team. All construction\n15 general contractor correspondence and direction flows through the CM. The CM oversees the daily\n16 construction field activities and is the onsite representative for the IDF PM.\n17 1.2.1.8 CQA Certifying Engineer\n18 The CQA certifying engineer is an employee or agent of the Tank Farm operating contractor who has the\n19 overall responsibility of implementing this CQA Plan and directly supervises the CQA monitor, field\n20 inspection team, and laboratory technicians. The CQA certifying engineer is responsible for preparation\n21 of an implementation plan that addresses how the CQA Plan is to be implemented, and how CQA work is\n22 to be performed, tracked, and coordinated, as well as how procedures outlined in this CQA Plan are to be\n23 followed. The implementation plan will be submitted to IDF project manager and CM for approval.\n24 Functionally, the CQA certifying engineer submits certified CQA reports to the IDF CM for review and\n25 approval by the IDF PM. The CQA certifying engineer is a registered professional engineer in\n26 Washington and has the authority to provide a certification letter that the IDF is constructed in accordance\n27 with the approved CQA Plan, the approved plans and specifications, and any approved changes. The\n28 CQA certifying engineer also has the authority and responsibility to stop work and recommend remedial\n29 actions to the IDF PM.\n30 1.2.1.9 Field Inspector\n31 Field inspectors are employees or agents of the Tank Farm operating contractor and report to the CQA\n32 certifying engineer. The field inspector's function is to perform testing and observations, in accordance\n33 with this CQA Plan and under the direction of the CQA monitor and CQA certifying engineer.\n34 1.2.1.10 Soils Laboratory Technicians\n35 Laboratory technicians are employees or agents of the Tank Farm operating contractor and report to the\n36 CQA certifying engineer and provide the QA laboratory testing, required by this CQA Plan, as requested\n37 by the CQA monitor, and CQA certifying engineer.\n38 1.2.1.11 CQA Surveyor\n39 The CQA surveyor will be an employee or agent of the Tank Farm operating contractor and will be a\n40 registered land surveyor in the State of Washington.\n41\n42\nAppendix 4B.12\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 1.2.1.12 CQA Monitor\n2 The CQA monitor is an employee or agent of the Tank Farm operating contractor, reports directly to the\n3 CQA certifying engineer, and is a CQA representative, supported by the field inspection team and\n4 laboratory technician. The CQA monitor ensures that all CQA tests are performed in accordance with\n5 this CQA Plan and accepted procedures.\n6 1.2.1.13 Construction General Contractor\n7 The IDF construction general contractor is responsible for implementing the approved design by\n8 providing the necessary labor, equipment, materials, and all other resources necessary to construct the\n9 IDF.\n10 1.2.1.14 Construction General Contractor Site Supervisor\n11 The site supervisor is an employee or agent of the construction general contractor and is responsible for\n12 implementing the IDF construction activities. The site supervisor has overall responsibility for all\n13 construction activities related to the IDF, controls day-to-day construction tasks, and is the point of\n14 contact for construction general contractor field personnel. The site supervisor ensures the work is\n15 progressing in accordance with approved construction contract documents and the approved schedule.\n16 1.2.1.15 Construction Subcontractors\n17 Construction subcontractors include specialty companies, retained by the IDF construction general\n18 contractor, to perform specific work activities at the IDF such as earth moving, geosynthetic lining\n19 installation, piping, and building/tank installation. The construction subcontractors report directly to the\n20 construction general contractor site supervisor.\n21 1.2.1.16 Construction General Contractor Quality Control\n22 The construction general contractor provides a construction QC engineer who supports the site supervisor.\n23 The primary responsibility of the construction QC engineer is to ensure that the work is performed in\n24 accordance with the technical specifications and construction drawings. Specific duties of the\n25 construction QC engineer include activities such as preparing construction submittals, field\n26 documentation, and interfacing with the CQA certifying engineer.\n27 1.2.2 Project Meetings\n28 The various progress and status meetings that are anticipated to be held throughout the IDF construction\n29 are described below. The purpose of the meetings is to discuss work progress, planning, and other issues\n30 related to construction. A portion of these meetings can be dedicated to CQA issues, as necessary, to\n31 provide an opportunity for the CQA team to express concerns regarding quality, relay test results, and\n32 ensure good communication between all organizations involved in the construction of the IDF.\n33 1.2.2.1 Pre-Construction Meeting\n34 A pre-construction meeting will be scheduled prior to beginning construction activities for the IDF. At a\n35 minimum, the meeting will be attended by IDF staff including the PM, CM, project engineer, design\n36 engineer, as well as the construction general contractor site supervisor, and the CQA certifying engineer.\n37 A portion of the meeting will be dedicated to the discussion of QA issues. Suggested CQA topics will\n38 include, but not be limited to:\n39 * Reviewing the responsibilities of each organization.\n40 * Discussing the authority of agencies and project and field team members to order work stoppages.\n41 * Reviewing lines of authority and communication for each organization.\n42 * Providing each organization with all relevant CQA documents and supporting information.\n43 * Familiarizing each organization with the CQA Plan and its role, relative to the design criteria,\n44 plans, and specifications.\nAppendix 4B.13\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI * Discussing the established procedures or protocol for observations and tests, including sampling\n2 strategies.\n3 * Discussing the established procedures or protocol for handling construction deficiencies, repairs,\n4 and re-testing, including \"stop work\" conditions.\n5 * Reviewing methods for documenting and reporting inspection data.\n6 * Reviewing methods for distributing and storing documents and reports.\n7 * Reviewing work area security and safety protocol.\n8 * Reviewing the proposed project schedule.\n9 * Discussing procedures for the location and protection of construction materials and for the\n10 prevention of damage of the materials from inclement weather or other adverse events.\n11 * Determining action items, assigning actionees, and recording minutes to be transmitted to\n12 meeting attendees.\n13 * Discussing document control requirements and control of CQA records.\n14 * Discussing control and protection of samples.\n15 1.2.2.2 Daily Pre-Job Briefing\n16 The construction general contractor will conduct daily pre-job briefings at the work area. The participants\n17 will include the construction field personnel, including lower tiered subcontractors and CQA\n18 representatives. The primary purpose of these meetings will be to address the day's planned activities.\n19 The CQA monitor will discuss CQA activities planned for that day and interface needs with the\n20 construction personnel. Suggested CQA topics are:\n21 * Review the work location and activities for the day.\n22 * Discuss the construction general contractor's personnel and equipment assignments for the day.\n23 * Address scheduling of resources for upcoming work.\n24 * Review any new test data.\n25 * Discuss any potential construction problems, including unexpected subsurface conditions.\n26 * Discuss CQA-planned activities and interface needs.\n27 This meeting will be documented and the documentation will be retained on file by the CQA monitor.\n28 1.2.2.3 Construction Progress Meetings\n29 Weekly progress meetings will be held at the site to discuss construction progress. At a minimum, the\n30 weekly progress meetings will be attended by the IDF PM, CM, the site supervisor, and the CQA\n31 certifying engineer or CQA monitor. The purposes of the meeting are to:\n32 * Review previous activities and accomplishments.\n33 * Review claims, change orders, delays, and similar items.\n34 * Review planned activities for the upcoming 2-week period.\n35 * Finalize resolution of problems from previous meetings.\n36 * Discuss potential problems with the work planned for the upcoming 2-week period.\n37 Minutes will be recorded and transmitted to meeting attendees and other interested parties.\n38 1.2.2.4 Non-Conformance Meetings\n39 Meetings will be convened as necessary to address non-conformances discovered during inspection.\n40 Deficiencies observed during construction by the CQA representatives will be brought to the attention of\n41 the IDF CM and CQA certifying engineer and documented using the non-conformance reporting (NCR)\n42 procedures outlined in Section 8.1.4.\n43\nAppendix 4B.14\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 These deficiencies also will be tracked in the CQA representative's field logbook until resolution and\n2 included in the daily summary report. These documents will include the description of the deficiency and\n3 actions taken or to be taken to resolve.\n4 1.2.3 Hold Points\n5 Mandatory hold points will be established for certain key activities. At these points, the IDF construction\n6 general contractor will notify the CQA monitor or CQA certifying engineer that the layer or portion of a\n7 layer is ready for review. The hold points anticipated for the IDF would be at completion or partial\n8 completion of each of the following components:\n9 * Prepared subgrade\n10 * SLDS geomembrane and composite drainage net (CDN)\n11 * SLDS riser pipe\n12 * Soil bentonite admix soil liner\n13 * Secondary GCL\n14 * Secondary geomembrane\n15 * LDSCDN\n16 * LDS piping\n17 * Primary geosynthetic clay liner (GCL)\n18 * Primary geomembrane\n19 * Cushion geotextile\n20 * LCRS piping\n21 * Drain gravel\n22 * Separation geotextile\n23 * Operations layer\n24 On side slopes, a LCRS CDN would substitute for the cushion geotextile, drain gravel, and separation\n25 geotextile.\n26 1.3 Personnel Qualifications and Training\n27 This section describes the qualifications and training required for CQA personnel. All documentation\n28 relating to qualifications will be maintained with the project CQA records.\n29 1.3.1 CQA Certifying Engineer\n30 The CQA certifying engineer will have landfill construction certification experience. The CQA certifying\n31 engineer will, at a minimum, be a registered civil professional engineer in good standing in the State of\n32 Washington, possess a bachelor's degree in civil or construction engineering, geotechnical engineering,\n33 engineering geology, or a closely related discipline, and have sufficient practical, technical, and\n34 managerial experience to direct successfully the CQA activities discussed in this CQA Plan. The CQA\n35 certifying engineer's qualifications will be documented by training records and a professional resume\n36 showing significant field experience in landfill construction and low permeability soil-bentonite admix\n37 liner construction, having directed CQA activities at a minimum of three landfill construction projects or\n38 a minimum of 100 acres of combined landfill area certifying experience. The CQA certifying engineer\n39 will be familiar with the EPA technical guidance document, Quality Assurance and Quality Control for\n40 Waste Containment Facilities (EPA 1993). Qualification documentation will be reviewed by the IDF PM\n41 and IDF project engineer.\n42 1.3.2 CQA Monitor\n43\nAppendix 4B.15\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI At a minimum, the CQA monitor will have a high school diploma and at least five years of construction-\n2 related experience, including at least three years of experience conducting CQA monitoring for earthwork\n3 construction (including a minimum of three landfill construction projects or a minimum of 50 acres of\n4 combined landfill area experience), or a bachelor of science degree from a four-year college or university\n5 and at least two years of experience conducting CQA monitoring for earthworks construction (including a\n6 minimum of three landfill construction projects). The CQA monitor must be capable of performing work\n7 with little or no daily supervision. The CQA monitor will be familiar with the EPA technical guidance\n8 document, Quality Assurance and Quality Control for Waste Containment Facilities (EPA 1993).\n9 Qualifications of the CQA monitor will be documented by training records and a professional resume,\n10 reviewed by the IDF PM and CQA certifying engineer.\n11 1.3.3 Field Inspector\n12 At a minimum, the field inspector will have a high school diploma and at least two years of construction-\n13 related experience, including at least one year of experience conducting CQA monitoring for earthwork\n14 construction, or will have a bachelor of science degree from a four-year college or university and at least\n15 six months of experience conducting field inspection for earthworks construction. The field inspector\n16 must be capable of routine engineering technician work, under general daily supervision. The field\n17 inspector will be familiar with the EPA technical guidance document, Quality Assurance and Quality\n18 Control for Waste Containment Facilities (EPA 1993). Qualifications of the field inspector will be\n19 documented by training records and a professional resume, reviewed by the IDF PM and CQA certifying\n20 engineer.\n21 1.3.4 Soils Laboratory Technicians\n22 Laboratory technicians will have at a minimum a high school diploma and at least five years of\n23 construction materials laboratory testing related experience, including at least three years of experience\n24 performing geotechnical laboratory tests for earthwork construction, including compacted low\n25 permeability soil-bentonite admix, or will have a bachelor of science degree from a four-year college or\n26 university and at least two years of experience performing geotechnical laboratory tests for earthwork\n27 construction, including low permeability soil-bentonite admix. The laboratory technician must be capable\n28 of routine laboratory tech work, under general daily supervision. Qualifications of laboratory technicians,\n29 including training records and professional resumes, will be reviewed by the IDF PM and CQA certifying\n30 engineer.\n31 1.3.5 Geosynthetic Laboratory\n32 The geosynthetic laboratory will be selected by the CQA certifying engineer and will provide the\n33 geosynthetic QA conformance testing required by this CQA Plan, as requested by the CQA monitor\n34 and/or CQA certifying engineer. The geosynthetics CQA laboratory will be unaffiliated with the\n35 materials supplier or manufacturer, or construction general contractor. The geosynthetics CQA laboratory\n36 will have at least five years of experience in testing geosynthetics and other relevant liner system\n37 components, and will be familiar with American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and other\n38 applicable test standards.\n39 1.4 Definitions Relating to Construction Quality Assurance\n40 1.4.1 Construction Quality Assurance and Construction Quality Control\n41 Construction Quality Assurance-A planned and systematic pattern of the means and actions designed\n42 to provide adequate confidence that items or services meet contractual and regulatory requirements, and\n43 will perform satisfactorily in service.\n44 Construction Quality Control (CQC)--Those actions that provide a means to measure and control the\n45 characteristics of an item or service to meet contractual and regulatory requirements.\nAppendix 4B.16\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 1.4.2 Use of the Terms in This Plan\n2 The definitions used in the context of this CQA Plan are as follows:\n3 * CQA refers to means and actions employed by the CQA representatives to assure conformity of\n4 liner system, LCRS, LDS, SLDS, and pipe preparation, production, and installation with this\n5 CQA Plan, the technical specifications, and the construction drawings. CQA will be provided by\n6 a third party, acting independently from the product manufacturer and construction general\n7 contractor.\n8 * CQC refers to those actions taken by manufacturers, suppliers, or construction general contractor,\n9 including their designated representatives, to ensure that the materials and the workmanship meet\n10 the requirements of the technical specifications and the construction drawings.\n11 1.5 References\n12 1.5.1 Applicable Organizations\n13 Organizations whose standards are referenced in the CQA Plan include:\n14 * ASTM-American Society for Testing and Materials\n15 * DOE-Department of Energy\n16 * GRI-Geosynthetic Research Institute\n17 * OSHA-Occupational Safety and Health Administration\n18 * EPA-U.S. Environmental Protection Agency\n19 1.5.2 Applicable Standards\n20 Any reference to standards of any society, institute, association, or governmental agency will pertain to\n21 the edition in effect as of the date of this CQA Plan, unless stated otherwise.\n22 Specific test standards for tests cited in the CQA Plan are provided in the technical specifications. These\n23 standards may be modified due to technological advances since compilation of the technical\n24 specifications. All such modifications are to be approved in accordance with change order procedures\n25 described in Section 8.1.5.\n26 1.6 Construction Activities and Submittal Requirements\n27 1.6.1 Construction Activities\n28 This section describes the construction activities and submittal requirements that will be performed by the\n29 construction general contractor during the IDF construction. This CQA Plan only addresses selected\n30 activities of the Phase I construction.\n31 In general, construction activities will consist of preparing the subgrade, installing the liner system, the\n32 leak detection systems (LDS and SLDS), the leachate collection and removal system (LCRS), and\n33 operations layer and necessary equipment to complete the landfill for waste acceptance. Construction\n34 will consist of these activities:\n35 * Mobilizing construction equipment and personnel.\n36 * Vendor data submittals.\n37 * Installing sediment and erosion control.\n38 * Preparing soil bentonite material.\n39 * Excavation, embankment, fine grading of landfill subgrade, and sump construction.\n40 * Constructing the secondary leak detection system (SLDS) sump.\n41 * Constructing the soil bentonite admix liner (SBL).\n42 * Dust control activities during construction.\nAppendix 4B.17\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * Placing the geosynthetics for the secondary liner.\n2 * Constructing the leak detection system (LDS).\n3 * Placing the geosynthetics for the primary liner.\n4 * Constructing the leachate collection and removal system.\n5 0 Constructing the operations layer.\n6 * Site restoration.\n7 * Demobilization.\n8 Prior to the start of construction activities, the CQA representatives will review and become familiar with\n9 all construction drawings, technical specifications, the CQA Plan, and RCRA permit. The CQA\n10 certifying engineer also will be familiar with the most recent construction schedule, so that adequate\n11 resources (i.e., laboratory, field testing equipment, staff, and CQA forms), including contingencies\n12 (e.g., backup equipment, alternate laboratory, and alternate CQA staff) for CQA activities, will be\n13 commensurate with the anticipated construction productivity and work schedule.\n14 1.6.2 Submittal Requirements\n15 The construction general contractor will provide the submittals required (listed in Table 1-1 in this\n16 section) to the IDF PM. Submittals will be provided far enough in advance of scheduled installation dates\n17 to allow time for reviews, possible revisions and resubmittals, placing orders, and securing delivery. The\n18 construction general contractor will identify, track, and disposition all required vendor data. The IDF PM\n19 will respond to each required submittal as stated in the technical specifications.\n20 The submittals presented in Table 1-I will be required as a minimum. A master submittal list will be\n21 provided as part of the contract documents.\n22 1.6.3 Receipt Inspection Procedures\n23 Inventory of manufactured materials used in lining system construction is detailed in Sections 3.1.4\n24 (GCL), 4.1.4 (geomembrane), 5.1.4 (geotextiles), 6.1.4 (CDN) and 7.1.4 (polyethylene piping). The\n25 purpose of this section is to provide a general summary of the minimum requirements and procedures for\n26 receiving and controlling purchased materials, equipment, or services as required by the contract\n27 documents.\n28 Procurement, receipt, and inspection of construction materials and equipment are the responsibilities of\n29 the construction general contractor, with verification by the CQA certifying engineer and IDF CM.\n30 Procedures specific to the IDF Phase I construction project will be prepared as part of the construction\n31 quality control (QC) plan, to be submitted by the construction general contractor.\n32 Procedures to control receipt inspection will include the following, at a minimum:\n33 * The contract documents will provide a master submittal list that identifies the materials,\n34 equipment, or services requiring receipt inspection. Upon delivery to the project site, the general\n35 construction contractor will attach secure and visible \"Quality Hold for Inspection\" tags to each\n36 item.\n37 * All items, materials, and equipment that have been tagged will be stored in segregated areas, as\n38 identified in the contract documents. Items will be restricted from further use until all\n39 construction general contractor and CQA certifying engineer inspections are completed.\n40 * Upon inspection if items, materials, or equipment held for inspection, the \"Quality Hold for\n41 Inspection\" tag will be removed and replaced with one of the following, as appropriate:\n42 * Acceptance tag\n43 * Non-conformance (red) tag\n44 a) Conditional use tag\nAppendix 4B.18\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI * The construction general contractor may utilize only those items tagged as \"Accepted\" or\n2 \"Conditional Use\".\n3 * Red-tagged materials will not be used in construction and will be moved to a segregated area or\n4 removed from the site.\n5 * Conditional use tagged materials are restricted to use for specific conditions identified on the tag.\n6 * Documentation of receipt inspection will be completed, maintained, and stored in a single\n7 location, in a secure and protected environment for the full performance period of the\n8 construction contract.\n9 Table 1.1. Required Submittals\nSubmittal Description Requirement\nSource Quality Gradation tests performed in accordance with ASTM Submitted by the\nControl for D422 by a qualified independent test laboratory for construction general\nImported imported materials on samples taken at place of contractor and\nMaterials production prior to shipment. Samples will be taken for approved by the TDF\n(structural fill, gradation testing from every 2,000 tons of prepared PM prior to the\ndrain gravel and materials, in accordance with ASTM D75. shipment of material to\ncrushed surfacing) the project site.\nGeomembrane Proposed layout drawings for each layer of geomembrane Submitted by the\nInstallation Plan material. Geomembrane layout will show panel construction general\nconfiguration, general dimensions, and seam locations, contractor and\napproved by the IDF\nPM prior to the\ninstallation of the\nrespective\ngeomembrane liner.\nSubgrade surface Certification in writing that the surface on which the Certificate signed by\nacceptance geomembrane will be installed is acceptable to the the installer and\ninstaller. A certificate of acceptance will be provided by construction general\nthe construction general contractor to the CQA contractor prior to\nrepresentative, who will then verify to the CQA certifying installation of\nengineer that the deployment surface has been accepted geomembrane over the\nimmediately prior to commencement of geomembrane subgrade.\ninstallation in the area under consideration.\nGCL quality Provide manufacturer's quality control (QC) test data for Submitted by the\ncontrol GCL material to be installed, including: construction general\ncertifications, test Bentonite -suppliers' name and location, brand name, lot contractor prior to\ndata and properties number, dated quality control information from supplier, installation of the GCL\nguarantee manufacturer's test data verifying that bentonite meets material and approved\nmanufacturer's specifications. by the IDF PM.\nGCL -written guarantee that GCL conforms to the\ntechnical specification requirements and test certificates\nfor each production lot or 50,000 square feet of GCL\nmaterial including roll numbers, test methods, and test\nresults verifying compliance with the technical\nspecification requirements for GCL.\nAppendix 4B. 19\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nSubmittal Description Requirement\nGeomembrane QC Testing shall be performed by manufacturer to Submitted by the\nquality control demonstrate the geomembrane conforms to technical construction general\ncertifications, test specification requirements. Prior to delivery of any contractor prior to\ndata and properties geomembrane material, the manufacturer shall submit all installation of the\nguarantee required information listed in the technical specifications geomembrane material\n(Section 02661). and approved by the\nQC Certification: Prior to shipment, the geomembrane IDF PM.\nmanufacturer shall provide a quality control certificate for\neach roll of geomembrane. The quality control certificate\nshall be signed by a responsible party employed by the\ngeomembrane manufacturer, such as the production\nmanager. The quality control certificate shall include:\nRoll numbers and identification, resin lot, and batch\nnumbers.\nSampling procedures and results of quality control tests.\nAs a minimum, results shall be given for thickness,\nasperity, tensile strength, and tear resistance in accordance\nwith methods indicated in the technical specifications.\nTests shall be conducted on each production lot of\ngeomembrane or every 50,000 square feet, whichever\nresults in the greater number of tests.\nGeotextile material Provide manufacturer's QC test data for geotextile Submitted by the\ncertifications and material to be installed, including: construction general\ntest data Geotextile -written guarantee that geotextile conforms to contractor prior to\nspecification requirements, certification that manufacturer installation of the\ncontinuously inspected geotextile for presence of needles geotextile material and\nand found it to be needle-free, and test certificates for approved by the ID\ngeotextile material including roll numbers, test methods, PM.\nand test results verifying compliance with the technical\nspecifications physical properties for geotextile.\nFrequency of manufacturer's QC testing shall be at the\nstandard rate stated in the manufacturer's QC plan for\neach required property in the technical specifications.\nAppendix 413.20\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nSubmittal Description Requirement\nComposite Provide manufacturer's QC test data for composite Submitted by the\ndrainage net drainage net material to be installed, including: construction general\nmaterial and Composite drainage net -manufacturer's specification contractor prior to\nmeasured using appropriate test methods, written installation of the\ntest data guarantee that composite drainage net conforms to composite drainage net\nspecification requirements, manufacturer's QC test data material and approved\nfor the geotextile component as specified above for by the IDF PM.\ngeotextile, and test certificates for composite drainage net\nmaterial and geonet component including roll numbers,\ntest methods, and test results verifying compliance with\nthe technical specification requirements for composite\ndrainage net and geonet. Frequency of manufacturer's QC\ntesting shall be at the standard rate stated in the\nmanufacturer's QC plan for each required property in the\ntechnical specifications.\nInterface Shear Provide data prior to material shipment for the interface Submitted by the\nStrength test data friction angle between the textured geomembrane and construction general\nother materials (including CDN, GCL, and Admix Liner) contractor prior to\ndirectly in contact with the geomembrane as specified in geosynthetic material\nSection 0266 1; and between the CDN and the operations shipment, reviewed,\nlayer as specified in Section 02373 of the technical and approved by the\nspecifications. IDF PM for\nFriction angle shall be determined by direct shear testing conformance with\nunder fully saturated conditions (ASTM D5321 or D6243 project strength\nfor GCL interface) at low nominal normal loads of both requirements. Allowspeifcaios.IDF PM afor mu\n100, 250, and 500 pounds per square foot (psf), and high IDF PM a minimum\nnominal normal loads of 2,000, 8,000, and 15,000 psf, 20 working days for\nexcept for the CDN/Operations Layer interface which this evaluation upon\nshall be reported at low normal load only. Report results receipt of data.\nfor both peak and large displacement (minimum 2 inches)\nstrength. Perform two interface shear strength tests on\neach interface under each set of normal loads.\nAdmix Liner Provide a detailed plan for preparation of the admix Submitted by the\nPreparation and material, including a description of the equipment and construction general\nPlacement Plan procedures to be used, personnel qualifications, equipment contractor prior to\ncalibration certificates and methods for monitoring start of admix\nbentonite additions and moisture conditioning. production for\nAlso provide an admix liner placement plan to specify lift approval by IDF PM.\nthickness control and to allow for required testing,\ndescribed in the CQA Plan and technical specifications on\nthe admix liner during placement operations.\nAppendix 4B.21\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nSubmittal Description Requirement\nBentonite QC Provide bentonite supplier's descriptive data, specification Submitted by the\ncertificates and sheets, literature, and other data as necessary to fully construction general\ntest data demonstrate that the bentonite proposed for use in the contractor prior to\nadmix complies with the requirements of the technical start of admix\nspecifications. The manufacturer shall certify that the production for\nbentonite furnished complies with these Specifications. approval by IDF PM.\nA certificate shall be submitted to the CQA Engineer for\neach railcar or every three truckloads of bentonite\ndelivered.\nPolyethylene Pipe Provide manufacturer's QC test data for piping and Submitted by the\nand Fittings fittings that will be installed on the landfill floors and construction general\nslopes. contractor prior to\ninstallation of the pipe\nfor approval by the\nIDF PM.\n1 SECTION 2 SOILS CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE\n2 This section discusses the CQA requirements for soil layers including fill placement, subgrade\n3 preparation, admix liner, drain gravel, and operations layer.\n4 2.1 Fill Placement and Subgrade Preparation\n5 This section of the CQA Plan addresses the soils components necessary to provide a prepared subgrade\n6 for the liner systems and specifies the soils CQA program to be implemented with regard to materials\n7 selection and evaluation, laboratory test requirements, field test requirements, and corrective action\n8 requirements.\n9 2.1.1 Fill Placement and Compaction\n10 The technical specifications will be followed for the stockpiling, placement, and compaction of earth fill\n11 and structural fill. The CQA monitor will monitor the fill placement and compaction to verify and\n12 document the following:\n13 * The soil being placed meets the technical specifications requirements for earth fill and structural\n14 fill as determined by the test methods and frequencies specified within this CQA Plan and the\n15 source quality control submittals.\n16 * The placement surface has been prepared as specified in the technical specifications.\n17 * The compacted lift thickness is in accordance with the requirements of the technical\n18 specifications.\n19 * The dry unit weight of the earth fill and structural fill meets specifications as determined by the\n20 test methods and frequencies described in Table 2-1 for earth fill and Table 2-2 for structural fill.\n21 * Material placed in permanent stockpiles meets the appropriate specifications for earth fill or\n22 structural fill.\n23 2.1.2 Construction Quality Assurance Evaluation\n24 The frequency of soils testing for CQA purposes will conform to the minimum frequencies presented in\n25 Table 2-1 for earth fill and Table 2-2 for structural fill. Material properties will be determined from\n26 samples collected either immediately after placement or from stockpiles.\nAppendix 4B.22\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Nuclear density meter test methods will be used for the field-testing of the in situ dry unit weight of the\n2 in-place, compacted fill. Any settlement or other defects in the fill will be backfilled and compacted in\n3 accordance with the technical specifications.\n4 Standard count calibrations will be conducted to monitor the aging of the nuclear density gauge sources in\n5 accordance with ASTM standards. Sand cone or drive sleeve tests will be conducted periodically to\n6 verify densities using the nuclear density gauge. Oven moisture content tests will be conducted and\n7 compared to field moisture content results to determine a field correction factor for moisture. Sand cone\n8 or drive sleeve tests and in situ moisture content tests will be performed at the frequencies specified in\n9 Tables 2-1 and 2-2.\n10 If an in-place density test result fails to meet specifications, a confirmatory test will be performed\n11 immediately adjacent to the failed test. If the confirmatory test meets or exceeds specifications, a second\n12 confirmatory test will be performed at a second location immediately next to the failed test. If the second\n13 confirmatory test also meets or exceeds specifications, the area will be declared as meeting project\n14 specifications and the confirmatory tests will be reported. In the event that either confirmatory test fails\n15 to meet specifications, a CQA representative will determine the extent and nature of the defect by\n16 observations and/or additional testing, as necessary, to identify the limits of the area that does not meet\n17 project specifications.\n18 If a defective area is discovered in the fill, a CQA representative will determine the extent and nature of\n19 the defect. If the defect is indicated by an unsatisfactory test result, the CQA representative will\n20 determine the extent of the defective area by additional tests, observations, a review of records, or other\n21 means that the CQA representative deems appropriate. If the defect is related to adverse site conditions,\n22 such as excessively wet soils or surface desiccation, the CQA representative will define the limits and\n23 nature of the defect by testing or observation. After the extent and nature of a defect is determined and\n24 remedied by the construction general contractor, the CQA representative will verify that the deficiency\n25 has been corrected by re-testing repaired areas before any additional work is performed by the\n26 construction general contractor in the area of the deficiency. All confirmatory tests, failing tests, and re-\n27 tests will be recorded in the CQA representative's field book or compaction testing form. The\n28 approximate location and elevation of each test will be recorded.\n29 The CQA representative will document fill placement and compaction as determined by the test methods\n30 and frequency prescribed by this CQA Plan and will report any non-conformance in accordance with the\n31 non-conformance reporting procedures outlined in Section 8.1.4.\n32 2.2 Prepared Subgrade\n33 The CQA representative will verify and document that the prepared subgrade is constructed to the\n34 elevations and grades shown in the construction drawings, with subgrade meeting the requirements of the\n35 technical specifications as determined by the test methods and frequencies specified within this CQA\n36 Plan.\n37 Upon completion of the excavation of the landfill, the CQA monitor will perform the following tasks:\n38 * Inspect the subgrade on the side slopes and base of the landfill and note areas of weak or\n39 excessively weathered subgrade materials.\n40 * Observe completion of excavation and subgrade compaction prior to foundation, fill, or liner\n41 placement.\n42 * Observe the proof rolling of the base of the landfill and note areas that exhibit excessive rutting,\n43 heaving, or softening.\n44 * Observe that the surface of the subgrade is free of debris, wet and soft areas, standing water,\n45 vegetation, mud, ice, or frozen material.\n46 * Observe any excavation and backfilling operations associated with unsuitable material found in\n47 the prepared subgrade.\nAppendix 4B.23\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * Verify that a survey has been conducted to further verify that the subgrade grades and elevations\n2 conform to the construction drawings.\n3 * Verify that the prepared subgrade material meets the requirements of the technical specifications\n4 as determined by the CQA testing methods and frequency in Table 2-3.\n5 * Verify that sampling points in the prepared subgrade are plugged or backfilled so that the\n6 prepared subgrade meets the technical specifications.\n7 * Document the location and volume of any unsuitable material removed from the prepared\n8 subgrade and report any non-conformance with the technical specifications in accordance with\n9 the non-conformance reporting procedures in Section 8.1.4\n10 2.2.1 Layer Completion Certification\n11 The construction general contractor will be required to notify the CQA representative when an area of\n12 prepared subgrade is complete prior to constructing the overlying layer. The construction general\n13 contractor can proceed with the overlying layer upon acceptance of the area of prepared subgrade by the\n14 CQA representative. The CQA certifying engineer will provide a certificate of layer completion to the\n15 construction general contractor and the IDF project engineer, certifying that the area is complete.\n16 2.3 Soil Bentonite Admix Liner and Test Pads\n17 The soil bentonite admix liner (SBL) is composed of a mixture of base soil and bentonite material. Two\n18 SBL test pads will include both a horizontal and a sloped test pad. The horizontal test pad will be\n19 constructed by using the same compaction methods as that used for the production SBL, to ensure the\n20 SBL is constructed to meet the minimum hydraulic conductivity requirements. The sloped test pad will\n21 be constructed on a sloping surface to verify that compaction methods (determined during the horizontal\n22 test pad) will be adequate for the side slopes of the landfill. If necessary, the technical specifications\n23 and/or CQA Plan may be modified, based on the results of the test pads.\n24 2.3.1 Test Pads\n25 Test pads will be constructed by the construction general contractor to determine acceptable placement\n26 and compaction methods to produce a low permeable SBL on a horizontal surface and on a 3H:IV side\n27 slope that satisfies the performance requirements of the technical specifications.\n28 In addition, the mixing of the base soil and bentonite admixture using the pugmill will be tested to ensure\n29 adequate control of the ratio of admixture components as well as the homogeneity of the completed SBL\n30 mixture.\n31 2.3.1.1 Construction Quality Assurance Evaluation\n32 During test pad construction, the CQA representative will continuously observe and document the\n33 construction of the test pad. These guidelines will be followed to ensure that the test pad accurately\n34 represents the performance of the full-scale facility:\n35 * Construction of the test pad will use the same soil material, design specifications, equipment, and\n36 procedures as proposed for the full-scale facility.\n37 * The test pad length, width, and depth will be as required by the technical specifications and for\n38 the in-situ hydraulic conductivity test spacing.\n39 * The number of lifts used to construct the test pad will be as required by the technical\n40 specifications.\n41 The test pad will be constructed to allow determination of the relationship among density, moisture\n42 content, and method of compaction. Field variables can affect this relationship and must be carefully\n43 measured and controlled, both in the test pad and during construction of the full-scale liner. At a\n44 minimum, the following will be observed and documented:\nAppendix 4B.24\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * Track weight of base soil and bentonite during mixing operations.\n2 * Mixing operation homogeneity.\n3 * Test pad configuration and dimensions.\n4 * Compaction equipment type, configuration, and weight.\n5 * Number of passes and speed of the compaction equipment.\n6 * Uncompacted and compacted lift thickness.\n7 * Weather conditions, including ambient temperature, humidity, wind speed and direction, and\n8 precipitation.\n9 The CQA representative will provide the necessary surveying and/or reference grid points, for adequately\n10 and expeditiously, determining the elevation and dimensions of the test pad, including each lift.\n11 The CQA representative will be responsible for all testing, surveying, and documentation necessary to\n12 verify that the test pad performs in accordance with the technical specifications, and that the methods,\n13 equipment, and materials used can achieve the same results or better during full-scale construction.\n14 Testing methods and frequencies will be as indicated in Table 2-4. Additional tests may be conducted at\n15 the direction of the CQA certifying engineer. All tests will be conducted in accordance with the methods\n16 and procedures specified in Table 2-4. Tests are separately identified in Table 2-4 which are intended to\n17 provide the following:\n18 * Information Only, for use in evaluating overall methods, materials, or equipment.\n19 * Pass/Fail, which have criteria established in the technical specifications which must be met.\n20 * Calibration and Check, for use in calibrating instruments.\n21 The CQA certifying engineer will compare the results of the test pad constructed on the level surface with\n22 the results of the test pad on the side slopes. The CQA certifying engineer will recommend changes to\n23 compaction methods, if necessary, to the IDF project engineer. The CQA certifying engineer will prepare\n24 an interim report, which summarizes the construction and testing of the test pads.\n25 It is important to note that an acceptable zone has been established in the technical specifications for the\n26 allowable moisture content and density ranges that are applicable for the SBL admix to meet minimum\n27 permeability requirements. This zone may be adjusted as a result of the test pad data obtained during\n28 construction to reflect specific conditions observed based on the construction general contractor's\n29 proposed blending, placement, and compaction methods. With the range of placement moisture content\n30 and density allowed with this approach, minimum compaction effort (i.e., the number of passes a piece of\n31 compaction equipment needs to bring the admix into the allowable moisture/density zone) will vary based\n32 on material conditions and placement location. Minimum compaction effort recommendations will be\n33 developed by the CQA certifying engineer for application to both bottom slope and side-slope admix\n34 construction based on test pad results. However, these minimums should be considered as guidelines\n35 only and may need to be adjusted based on changes to admix properties (primarily moisture content), site\n36 conditions, and compaction location as needed to bring the admix into the required acceptable zone for\n37 compaction.\n38 2.3.2 Soil Bentonite Admix Liner\n39 The CQA team will verify and document that the SBL is placed to the elevations, grades, and thicknesses\n40 shown in the construction drawings, with bentonite-amended material meeting the requirements of the\n41 technical specifications as determined by the test methods and frequencies specified within this CQA\n42 Plan.\n43 2.3.2.1 Construction Quality Assurance Evaluation\n44 CQA testing will be performed during processing and placement of the SBL. The CQA team will\n45 conduct the processing and placement tests for the SBL as specified in Table 2-5. The maximum\n46 allowable percentage of failing tests is specified in Table 2-6.\nAppendix 4B.25\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Processing\n2 The construction general contractor shall process and condition admix material using a central type\n3 pugmill plant as described in the technical specifications. Prior to amending the base soil with bentonite,\n4 a CQA representative will verify and document the following:\n5 * Equipment and methods are the same or equivalent as determined from the test pad studies.\n6 * All submittals have been reviewed and approved.\n7 * The base soil source area (either onsite excavation or borrow area) has been approved by the\n8 design engineer, IDF PM, or IDF project engineer.\n9 * The mixing equipment is suitable for amending base soils with bentonite.\n10 * The base soil does not contain rocks with dimensions in excess of those required by the technical\n11 specifications.\n12 During processing, the CQA representative will verify and document the following:\n13 * The bentonite is in conformance with the technical specifications.\n14 * Close observation of the base soil excavation and processing is performed by the field inspector.\n15 * The processed SBL material meets the requirements of the technical specifications as determined\n16 by the CQA testing methods and frequency in Table 2-5.\n17 * The moisture content and consistency of base soil allow bentonite to be mixed uniformly.\n18 * Bentonite amendments are mixed uniformly with the base soil.\n19 * The processed SBL material is stored, protected, and allowed to cure in accordance with the\n20 conditions and minimum requirements of the technical specifications.\n21 * Calibration of the pugmill operation feed rate controls for bentonite, base soil, and water.\n22 * The bentonite is mixed at the required application rate, established by the technical specifications\n23 as determined by the CQA testing methods and frequency in Table 2-5.\n24 The CQA representative will document the properties of the processed soil bentonite material, as\n25 determined by the test methods and frequency prescribed by this CQA Plan, and will report any non-\n26 conformance with the technical specifications, following procedures outlined in Section 8.1.4.\n27 The CQA representative will observe processing activities including base soil excavation, bentonite\n28 blending, and moisture conditioning.\n29 The CQA representative will monitor the excavation of base soil from the approved borrow source or\n30 onsite excavations. Deleterious base soil or base soil not meeting the technical specifications will be\n31 identified and reported to the CQA certifying engineer and not allowed in the processing area.\n32 CQA tests will be performed on the raw bentonite used in the SBL to verify conformance to the technical\n33 specifications. The CQA representative will collect samples of raw bentonite delivered to the site for\n34 testing. The CQA laboratory technician will conduct free swell, and grain size tests of the bentonite in\n35 accordance with Table 2-5. If the test results of a sample fail to meet specifications, a confirmatory test\n36 will be performed immediately subsequent to the failed test. If the confirmatory test meets or exceeds\n37 specifications, a second confirmatory test will be performed. If the second confirmatory test also meets or\n38 exceeds specifications, the bentonite will be declared as meeting project specifications and the\n39 confirmatory tests will be reported. In the event that either confirmatory test fails to meet specifications,\n40 the bentonite will be rejected and removed from the site.\n41 The CQA representative will observe mixing and test the bentonite-amended soil, prior to placing it in the\n42 landfill.\n43 Placement\n44 Prior to the placement of the SBL, the CQA representative will verify and document the following:\nAppendix 4B.26\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * The test pads have been constructed with the approved liner material and production scale\n2 equipment to confirm placement and compaction procedures produce the required low-\n3 permeability admix for both on a horizontal surface and on a 3H: IV side slope.\n4 * All or an approved portion of the prepared subgrade meets specifications as determined by the\n5 test requirements of this CQA Plan and the CQA certifying engineer has issued the completion\n6 certificate.\n7 * The SBL material is free of roots, stumps, vegetation, or any other type of deleterious material\n8 that may impact the performance of the placed SBL.\n9 * The SBL material does not contain stones with dimensions in excess of those required by the\n10 technical specifications.\n11 * The SBL material meets or exceeds the requirements of the technical specifications as determined\n12 by the CQA testing methods and frequency in Table 2-5.\n13 * The moisture content of the SBL material is uniform.\n14 During placement and compaction of the SBL, the CQA Team will verify and document the following:\n15 * Close observation of the placement and compaction of SBL material with earthmoving equipment\n16 is performed by the field inspectors. Inspectors to verify that means and methods are the same as\n17 those approved in the test pad process.\n18 * The SBL material meets the requirements of the technical specifications as determined by the\n19 CQA testing methods and frequency in Table 2-5 and is within the maximum allowable failure\n20 rates in Table 2-6.\n21 * The SBL is placed in accordance with the conditions and minimum requirements of the technical\n22 specifications.\n23 * Each lift is compacted to the required thickness and minimum dry unit weight within the range of\n24 moisture contents established by the technical specifications as determined by the CQA testing\n25 methods and frequency in Table 2-5.\n26 * Shelby tube samples are collected for laboratory permeability testing at the frequency specified in\n27 Table 2-5.\n28 * Penetrations in the SBL at testing and sampling locations are repaired in accordance with the\n29 technical specifications.\n30 * The SBL is maintained until it is covered by the geomembrane liner in accordance with the\n31 technical specifications.\n32 * In areas of inaccessibility by the compactor, in areas of nonstandard SBL placement, and/or in\n33 areas of different compaction methods, more frequent testing will be performed due to thinner lift\n34 thicknesses to achieve equivalent compactive effort. Each lift, no matter how thin, will be tested\n35 for density and moisture in accordance with Table 2-5.\n36 The CQA representative will document the properties of the SBL as determined by the test methods and\n37 frequency prescribed by this CQA Plan and will report any non-conformance in accordance with the\n38 non-conformance reporting, as outlined in Section 8.1.4.\n39 The CQA representatives will collect samples immediately after a loose lift of SBL materials has been\n40 placed for property tests, prior to compaction. Once compacted, nuclear density gauge test methods will\n41 be used for testing the in situ compacted dry unit weight and moisture content of the SBL. Standard\n42 count calibration and moisture content tests will be used to calibrate the reading of the nuclear density\n43 gauge. Standard count calibration and in situ moisture content tests, using the oven dry method, will be\n44 performed at the frequencies specified in Table 2-5. The results of the oven dry moisture content tests\n45 will be compared with the field moisture content results to determine a field moisture correction factor.\nAppendix 4B.27\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The CQA representative will adjust the field moisture correction factor as test data is collected (i.e.,\n2 moving average). The CQA representative will collect Shelby tube samples of the SBL for laboratory\n3 permeability tests as specified in Table 2-5.\n4 If in-place density test results fail to meet specifications, a confirmatory test will be performed\n5 immediately adjacent to (within 3 ft of) the failed test. If the confirmatory test meets or exceeds\n6 specifications, a second confirmatory test will be performed at a second location immediately next to\n7 (within 3 ft of) the failed test. If the second confirmatory test also meets or exceeds specifications, the\n8 area will be declared as meeting project specifications and the confirmatory tests will be reported. In the\n9 event that either confirmatory test fails to meet specifications, additional testing will be performed to\n10 identify the limits of the area that does not meet project specifications. All confirmatory tests, failing\n11 tests, and re-tests will be recorded in the CQA representative's field book or compaction testing form.\n12 The approximate location and elevation of each test will be recorded.\n13 Rapid laboratory permeability tests, such as the constant volume tests, will be used when possible to\n14 determine permeability. Once the sample has achieved the specified permeability, the test result will be\n15 reported immediately to the CQA certifying engineer. The number of failing tests will be less than the\n16 maximum percentage of failing tests specified in Table 2-6. The maximum percentage of failing tests are\n17 anticipated to cover laboratory or field recording mistakes, math errors, or other unknown circumstances\n18 that are not discovered until after the layer is covered with the succeeding layer(s). Otherwise, all failed\n19 tests will be corrected in the field as they are observed.\n20 If a defective area is discovered in the SBL other than a failed in-place density test, the CQA\n21 representative will determine the extent and nature of the defect. If the defect is indicated by an\n22 unsatisfactory test result, the CQA representative will determine the extent of the defective area by\n23 additional tests, observations, a review of records, or other means that the CQA representative deems\n24 appropriate. If the defect is related to adverse site conditions, such as excessively wet soils or surface\n25 desiccation, the CQA representative will define the limits and nature of the defect by testing or\n26 observation. After the extent and nature of a defect is determined and remedied by the construction\n27 general contractor, the CQA representative will verify that the deficiency has been corrected by re-testing\n28 repaired areas before any additional work is performed by the construction general contractor in the area\n29 of the deficiency.\n30 The testing frequency during the SBL construction may be increased or modified at the discretion of the\n31 CQA certifying engineer, when visual observations of construction performance indicate potential\n32 problems or when field experience with the proposed SBL material have been obtained.\n33 During construction, the frequency of testing may be increased by the CQA representative during adverse\n34 weather conditions, if equipment breaks down, at the start and finish of grading, if the material fails to\n35 meet the requirements of the technical specifications, or if the extent of the work area is reduced.\n36 The construction general contractor will repair all penetrations in the SBL resulting from sampling and\n37 other CQA activities, in accordance with the technical specifications. These perforations will be\n38 identified to the construction general contractor by the CQA representative. All repairs will be inspected\n39 by the CQA representative.\n40 The construction general contractor will be required to use all means necessary to protect all prior work as\n41 well as all materials and completed work of other sections. In the event of damage, the construction\n42 general contractor will be required to make immediately all repairs and replacements necessary. The\n43 CQA representative will verify and document that all damages are repaired.\n44 2.3.2.2 Layer Completion Certification\n45 The construction general contractor will be required to notify the CQA representative when an area of\n46 SBL is complete, prior to constructing the overlying layer. The construction general contractor may\n47 begin placement of the overlying layer after acceptance of the SBL by the CQA certifying engineer.\nAppendix 4B.28\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The CQA certifying engineer will provide a certificate of layer completion to the construction general\n2 contractor and the IDF project engineer, certifying that the area is complete.\n3 The CQA certifying engineer will ensure all CQA tests are complete and that all defective areas have\n4 been repaired and re-tested in accordance with this CQA Plan and the technical specifications. The\n5 certificate of layer completion will indicate that the SBL meets the low permeability requirement, based\n6 on laboratory tests and the thickness of the SBL meeting the minimum requirement specified in the\n7 technical specifications.\n8 2.4 Drain Gravel\n9 2.4.1 Conformance Evaluation\n10 No CQA conformance material testing is planned for the drain gravel. Construction general contractor is\n11 required to submit gradation test results demonstrating conformance with required material properties as\n12 part of source quality control, in accordance with the technical specifications.\n13 2.4.2 Placement and Compaction\n14 The CQA representative will verify and document that the drain gravel is constructed to the elevations,\n15 grades, and thicknesses shown in the construction drawings, with material meeting the requirements of\n16 the technical specifications as determined by the test methods and frequencies specified within this CQA\n17 Plan.\n18 Prior to the placement of the drain gravel, the CQA representative will verify and document that:\n19 * The underlying geosynthetic layers are free of holes, tears, excessive wrinkles, or foreign objects.\n20 * All work on underlying layers is complete and accepted by the CQA certifying engineer.\n21 During placement and compaction of the drain gravel, the CQA representative will verify and document\n22 the following:\n23 * Drain gravel material satisfies the requirements of the technical specifications as determined by\n24 the source quality control submittals.\n25 * Drain gravel material is non-angular and free of material that could damage the underlying liner\n26 materials.\n27 * Drain gravel material is spread during cooler portions of the day, unless otherwise approved by\n28 the CQA certifying engineer.\n29 * Spreading and hauling equipment and operations are in compliance with material thickness and\n30 operations requirements, given in the technical specifications.\n31 * If excessive wrinkles begin to develop in the underlying geosynthetics during gravel or sand\n32 placement or spreading, the wrinkles are worked out prior to continued placement operations.\n33 * The drain gravel is placed in a manner that will not damage underlying geosynthetics, will\n34 minimize slippage of geosynthetic layers, and will not provide excess tensile stress on the\n35 geosynthetics, in accordance with the technical specifications.\n36 * Close observation of the placement and compaction of drain gravel with earth moving equipment\n37 is performed.\n38 2.4.3 Construction Quality Assurance Evaluation\n39 No density tests will be conducted on the drain gravel. If the CQA representative suspects damage to\n40 pipes or underlying geosynthetic, the construction general contractor will be required to expose the\n41 potentially damaged materials and repair any observed damage.\n42 2.4.4 Layer Completion Certification\n43 The construction general contractor will be required to notify the CQA representative when an area of the\n44 LCRS or LDS drain gravel is complete, prior to constructing the overlying layer.\nAppendix 4B.29\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The construction general contractor may begin placing the overlying layer when the drain gravel is\n2 accepted by the CQA certifying engineer. The CQA certifying engineer will provide a certificate of layer\n3 completion to the construction general contractor and the IDF project engineer, certifying that the area is\n4 complete.\n5 2.5 Operations Layer\n6 The CQA representative will verify and document that the operations layer, including the operations layer\n7 material placed in the SLDS sump area, is constructed to the elevations, grades, and thicknesses shown in\n8 the construction drawings, with material meeting the requirements of the technical specifications as\n9 determined by the test methods and frequencies specified within this CQA Plan.\n10 Prior to the placement of the operations layer, the CQA representative will verify and document the\n11 following:\n12 * The underlying geosynthetic layer is free of holes, tears, excessive wrinkles, or foreign objects.\n13 * All work on underlying layers is complete and accepted by the CQA certifying engineer.\n14 During placement of the operations layer, the CQA representative will verify and document that:\n15 * The soil is suitable and satisfies the requirements of the technical specifications as determined by\n16 the test methods and frequencies prescribed in Table 2-7.\n17 * The operations soil is placed in accordance with the technical specifications and construction\n18 drawings.\n19 * The lift thicknesses and total thickness of the operations layer agree with the requirements of the\n20 construction drawings.\n21 * If excessive wrinkles begin to develop in the underlying geosynthetics during material placement\n22 or spreading, the wrinkles are worked out prior to continued placement operations.\n23 * The operations layer is placed in a manner that will not damage underlying geosynthetics, will\n24 minimize slippage of geosynthetic layers, and will not provide excess tensile stress on the\n25 geosynthetics, in accordance with the technical specifications.\n26 * Spreading and hauling equipment and operations are in compliance with material thickness and\n27 operations requirements given in the technical specifications.\n28 * The operations layer is placed on the side slopes to the limits shown in the construction drawings.\n29 * No operations layer material is placed or compacted during periods of unfavorable weather\n30 conditions, such as after heavy rains or snow, in accordance with requirements given in the\n31 technical specifications.\n32 2.5.1 Conformance Evaluation\n33 The test methods and frequencies for CQA conformance testing for the operations layer are specified in\n34 Table 2-7.\n35 If damage to underlying geosynthetics is suspected, the CQA representative will require that the overlying\n36 operations layer material be removed to expose the geosynthetics.\n37 The construction general contractor will be required to use all means necessary to protect all prior work,\n38 as well as all materials and completed work of other sections. In the event of damage, the construction\n39 general contractor will be required to make immediately all repairs and replacements necessary. The\n40 CQA representative will verify and document that all damages are repaired.\n41 2.5.2 Layer Completion Certification\n42 The construction general contractor will be required to notify the CQA representative when an area of the\n43 operations layer is complete. The CQA certifying engineer will provide a certificate of layer completion\n44 to the construction general contractor and the IDF project engineer, certifying that the area is complete.\nAppendix 4B.30\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 2.6 Soil Surveying\n2 A survey will be performed by or under the direction of a professional land surveyor registered in the\n3 State of Washington. The surveyor will independently survey the elevations and grades of the soil layers\n4 including, but not limited to:\n5 * Top of prepared subgrade.\n6 * Top of SBL.\n7 * Top of LCRS drain gravel.\n8 * Top of operations layer.\n9 Surveys will be performed on the base, side slopes of the landfill, to confirm that the grades and\n10 elevations in the field agree with those shown in the construction drawings and with the minimum\n11 acceptable tolerances required in the technical specifications. The results of the survey, conducted by the\n12 surveyor, will be compiled in a report signed by the surveyor and the CQA certifying engineer.\n13 The surveyor will be required to survey each soil layer of the liner system for the IDF landfill, in\n14 accordance with the requirements of this CQA Plan. A record drawing or tabular listing of surveyed\n15 points will be submitted to the CQA certifying engineer by the surveyor before the placement of the next\n16 liner system layer. The surveys will be conducted at a 50-ft grid across the entire area of the survey. The\n17 survey will include, but not be limited to, the following features of the landfill:\n18 * Toe of slope.\n19 * Crest of slope.\n20 * Grade breaks.\n21 * Anchor trench.\n22 * SLDS, LDS and LCRS sumps.\n23 Table 2.1. Minimum Frequency of Testing for CQA Evaluation of Earthfill\nTest Frequency Standard Test Method\nMaterial Properties\nStandard proctor or maximum I per 20,000 yd3 ASTM D698 or ASTM\nindex density for free-draining (minimum 1 per source or soil type) D4253\nsoil\nPlacement\nIn-place wet unit weight I per 5,000 ft2 per lift ASTM D2922, D1556\nIn-place moisture content I per 5,000 ft2 per lift ASTM D3017, D2216\nStandard count calibration 1 per day of fill placement ASTM D3017/D2922\nOven moisture contents I per day of fill placement ASTM D2216\n(in situ moisture content)\n24 Table 2.2. Minimum Frequency of Testing for CQA Evaluation of Structural Fill\nTest Frequency Standard Test Method\nMaterial Properties\nStandard proctor or maximum I per 2,000 tons (minimum 1 per source or ASTM 698 or ASTM 4253\nindex density for free-draining soil type)\nsoil\nAnpendix 4B3.31\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTest Frequency Standard Test Method\nPlacement\nIn place moisture content I per 2,500 ft2 per lift ASTM D3017, D2216\nIn place dry unit weight I per 2,500 ft2 per lift ASTM D2922, D1556\nStandard count calibration I per day of fill placement ASTM D3017/D2922\nOven moisture contents 1 per day of fill placement ASTM D2216\n(in situ moisture content)\nTable 2.3. Minimum Frequency of Testing for CQA Evaluation of Prepared Subgrade\nTest Frequency Standard Test Method\nMaterial Properties a\nStandard proctor or maximum 1 per 250,000 ft2 ASTM 698 or\nindex density for free-draining (minimum 1 per source or soil type) ASTM 4253\nsoil\nIn Place b\nIn-place wet unit weight 4 per acre (approx. I per 10,000 ft2) ASTM D2922, D1556\nIn-place moisture content 4 per acre (approx. I per 10,000 ft2) ASTM D3017, D2216\nStandard count calibration 1 per day when in place tests are performed ASTM D3017/D2922\nConcrete block calibration I per day when in place tests are performed ASTM D3017/D2922\nOver moisture content I per day when in place tests are performed ASTM D2216\n(in situ moisture content)\na Prior to subgrade excavation.\nb. After reaching subgrade elevation.\n2\nAppendix 4B.32\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTable 2.4. Test Pad Testing Methods and Minimum Frequency\nTest Frequency Standard Test Method\nMaterial Property\nNatural moisture content a 4 per each Base Soil type per test ASTM D2216\npad\nParticle size distribution b 4 per each Base Soil type per test ASTM D422\npad\nStandard proctor a 4 per each Base Soil type per test ASTM D698\npad\nBentonite dry fineness b I per test pad Technical specification\nBentonite high swelling b 1 per test pad Technical specification\nProcessing b\nBentonite/Base Soil application rate 1 per working day of admix Measure weight of base soil and\nprocessing during test pad bentonite entering pugmill\nconstruction during a given period of time\nMaximum clod size Periodic monitoring Observation\nCuring 1 per 12 hours Observation\nPre Compaction a\nLift thickness 1 per lift Field measurement\nPercent fines I per lift ASTM D 1140\nPercent gravel I per lift ASTM D422\nAtterberg limits I per lift ASTM D4318\nPlacement Periodic monitoring Observation\nPost Compaction\nLift thickness b 4 per lift Field measurement\nIn-place moisture content b 4 per lift ASTM D3017\nIn-place dry unit weight b 4 per lift ASTM D2922\nShelby tube samples b (laboratory I per lift ASTM D1587/ASTM D5084c,d\npermeability)\nNumber of passes a Monitor each lift Observation\nBoutwell permeameter test b 5 for the horizontal test pad only ASTM D6391, first stage only\nCalibration and Check e\nStandard count calibration I per day of fill placement ASTM D3017/D2922\nOven moisture contents I per lift ASTM D2216\n(in situ moisture content)\nIn-place dry unit weight 1 per lift ASTM D1556, D2167, or D2937\nNotes:\na Tests for information only\nb Pass/fail tests\nc The average effective confining stress will be 5 psi.\nd Rapid turnaround tests (Method F-Constant Volume) will be used when possible.\ne Calibration check tests\nAppendix 4B.33\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTable 2.5. Minimum Frequency of Testing for CQA Evaluation of SBL\nTest Frequency Standard Test Method\nBentonite\nDry fineness 1 per lot ]Technical specification a\nHigh swelling 11 per lot jTechnical specification\nProcessing\nBase soil excavation Periodic monitoring Observation\nase soil natural moisture content per working day of hauling base materialBaesi1aua mitr otn .STM D22 16or per material color/consistency change\nase soil grain size I per working day of hauling base material\nor per material color/consistency change\nMeasure weight of base soil\nBentonite/Base Soil application . . and bentonite entering\n1 per working day of admix processing pgildrn ie rate pugmill during a given\nperio of time\nMaximum clod size Periodic monitoring Observation\nCuring c 1 per 12 hours Observation\nPre-Compaction\nLift thickness d 1 per 2,500 ft2 per lift Field measurement\nPercent fines per 1,000 ydD140(minimum of I per day of placement)\nPercent gravel I per 1,000 ydD422(minimum of I per day of placement)\nAtterberg limits I per 1,000 yd3D4318(minimum of I per day of placement)\nPlacement Periodic monitoring Observation\nPost Compaction\nLift thickness 5 per acre per lift Full measurement\nIn place moisture content 5 per acre per lift ASTM D3017\nIn place dry unit weight 5 per acre per lift ASTM D2922\nShelby tube samples (laboratory ASTM D1587/\nermeability) pASTM D5084 e, f\nNumber of passes g Observe 1 per acre per lift Observation\nConstruction oversight Periodic monitoring Observation\nCalibration and Check\n1en moisture content (per each per 10 nuclear gauge moisture contents ASTM D2216nuclear gauge)\nStandard count calibration (per 1 per day of placement ASTM D2922/ASTM D3017each nuclear gauge)\na The test method is described in the technical specification. e The average effective confining stress will be 5 psi.\nb Not used. f Rapid turnaround tests (Method F -Constant Volume) will\nCuring is stockpiling the SBL material for 12 hours to allow be used when possible.\nthe bentonite to hydrate. 9 A single pass is defined as forward and back.\nd A loose lift thickness is such that the compacted thickness is\n6 inches or less.\nAppendix 4B.34\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTable 2.6. Maximum Allowable Percentage of Failed Tests for CQA Evaluation of SBL\nTest Maximum percentage\nPercent gravel 5 percent not concentrated in one lift or one area\nClod size 10 percent not concentrated in one lift or one area\n3 percent not concentrated in one lift or one area, and no water content\nIn place moisture content less than 2 percent or more than 3 percent of the specified value\n3 percent not concentrated in one lift or one area, and no dry unit weight\nIn place dry unit weight less than 5 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) below the specified value\nShelby tube samples (laboratory 5 percent not concentrated in one lift or one areapermeability)\n2\n3 Table 2.7. Minimum Frequency of Testing for CQA Evaluation of Operations Layer\nTest Frequency Standard Test Method\nMaterial Properties\nStandard proctor or maximum index 1 per 20,000 yd ASTM D698 or\ndensity for free-draining soil (minimum 1 per source or soil type) ASTM D4253\nSieve analysis 1 per 10,000 yd' placed (minimum 1 ASTM D422per source)\nIn-Place (Outside edge of liner only)\nIn-place wet unit weight 1 per 5,000 ft2 per lift ASTM D2922, D1556\nIn-place moisture content 1 per 5,000 ft2 per lift ASTM D3017, D2216\nIn-Place (SLDS sump)\nIn-place wet unit weight 2 per lift ASTM D2922, D1556\nIn-place moisture content 2 per lift ASTM D3017, D2216\n4\n5\nAppendix 4B.35\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI SECTION 3 GEOSYNTHETIC CLAY LINER CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE\n2 3.1 Geosynthetic Clay Liner Manufacture and Delivery\n3 3.1.1 Labeling\n4 The CQA representative will verify and document that the GCL manufacturer has labeled each roll of\n5 GCL and includes the information required by the technical specifications. The CQA representative will\n6 examine GCL rolls upon delivery and deviation from the above requirements will be reported to the CQA\n7 certifying engineer prior to installation of the GCL.\n8 3.1.2 Transportation and Handling\n9 The CQA representative will observe and document that the type of GCL handling equipment used by the\n10 installer minimizes damage to the material. Upon delivery at the site, the CQA representative will\n11 conduct a visual inspection of all rolls for defects and for damage. This examination will be conducted\n12 without unrolling rolls unless visible defects or damages are found. The CQA representative will indicate\n13 to the CQA certifying engineer:\n14 * Any rolls that need to be unrolled to allow for their inspection.\n15 * Any rolls, or portions thereof, that need to be rejected and removed from the site because they\n16 have severe flaws.\n17 * Any rolls that include minor repairable flaws.\n18 3.1.3 Storage\n19 The CQA representative will verify and document that storage of the GCL is in accordance with the\n20 technical specifications.\n21 3.1.4 Inventory\n22 All geosynthetic materials that arrive onsite will be inventoried. The inventory will include the specific\n23 roll numbers delivered with each shipment. The inventory will be compared to the QC testing\n24 information, supplied by the manufacturer to ensure that the material tested is the same material that was\n25 delivered to the site. Material for which QC testing data has been supplied will be sampled for\n26 conformance testing. Conformance samples may be obtained by the CQA representative at the\n27 manufacturing plant or taken upon delivery of the material to the site by a CQA representative. As\n28 shipments arrive at the site, a CQA representative will monitor the unloading operations and will\n29 inventory the material. Rolls selected for conformance testing will be set aside for sampling as soon as\n30 possible.\n31 The CQA representative will record the following information, at a minimum, for each roll:\n32 * Manufacturer-Indicate the manufacturer of the material that is being inventoried, which may\n33 not be the same as the installer.\n34 * Date of Inventory-Date that the material was inventoried.\n35 * Date of Delivery-Enter date when the truck arrived onsite, if known.\n36 * Truck Type-Indicate type of truck used for shipping geosynthetics (covered or uncovered\n37 flatbed, box trailer).\n38 * Bill of Lading Number-If the bill-of-lading is available, indicate number and date (also attach\n39 copy to inventory form).\n40 * CQA Representative-Indicate name of CQA representative performing inventory.\n41 * Unloading Equipment-Indicate the type and model number of the equipment unloading the\n42 geosynthetic material; also note any special attachments that are used to unload the material\n43 (stinger, straps, forks).\nAppendix 4B.36\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * Weather Conditions-Describe the weather conditions, including temperature, wind, cloud cover,\n2 and precipitation during unloading and conformance sampling operation.\n3 * Material Type-Indicate type of geosynthetic material.\n4 * Roll Number-Indicate each roll number that is written on the roll. (The roll numbers contain a\n5 variety of information regarding the material and the manufacturing process.)\n6 * Lot Number-Lot number.\n7 * Roll (L x W)-Indicate the roll width as written on the roll label; if two materials are bonded\n8 together (i.e., geonet/geotextile), obtain measurements for both materials.\n9 * Area (square feet)-Indicate the total square footage of the roll.\n10 * Damage Remarks-Document any visible damage to the roll; if possible, indicate if damage was\n11 present prior to unloading or if it occurred during unloading.\n12 The CQA representative will immediately notify the IDF CM if a nonconforming or conditional use tag is\n13 attached to any of the inventoried items.\n14 Items that are restricted from further use until the inspections have been completed will be clearly\n15 delineated by the CQA representative. Accepted materials will be kept separate or clearly delineated\n16 from inventoried and approved items, to the extent possible. The CQA representative will be responsible\n17 for coordinating with the construction general contractor during material delivery, so that the material is\n18 not moved more than necessary after it is unloaded and damage due to handling is minimized.\n19 The CQA representative will perform the inventory immediately after the material arrives on the site to\n20 avoid delaying construction. The CQA representative will be responsible for verifying that only accepted\n21 material is installed at the IDF landfill and that all inventories and inspections are documented and\n22 maintained.\n23 3.1.5 Quality Assurance Conformance Testing\n24 Either at the manufacturer's plant or upon delivery of the rolls of GCL, the CQA representative will\n25 ensure that samples are removed at the specified frequency and forwarded to the Geosynthetics CQA\n26 Laboratory for testing, to verify and document conformance with the technical specifications.\n27 Conformance samples will be taken across the entire width of the roll and will not include the first 3 feet\n28 along the length of the roll. Unless otherwise specified, samples will be 1.5 feet (minimum) long by the\n29 roll width. The CQA representative will mark the machine direction on the samples with an arrow.\n30 Unless otherwise specified, samples will be taken at a rate of one per lot or one per 50,000 square feet,\n31 whichever is greater. These samples will be tested for:\n32 * Index Flux (ASTM D5887).\n33 * Bentonite Mass per Unit Area (ASTM D5993).\n34 * Bentonite Swell Index Test (ASTM D5890).\n35 The test will be conducted in accordance with the test procedure presented in the technical specifications.\n36 The CQA representative will examine all results from laboratory conformance testing and compare the\n37 results to the specifications presented in the technical specifications. In addition, the CQA representative\n38 will report any non-conformance to the CQA certifying engineer as soon as practical after the test results\n39 become available.\n40 The following procedure will apply whenever a sample fails a conformance test that is conducted by the\n41 Geosynthetics CQA Laboratory:\n42 * The construction general contractor will be required to replace the roll (or rolls) of GCL not in\n43 conformance with the specifications with a roll, that meets the requirements of the technical\n44 specifications.\nAppendix 4B.37\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n* The CQA representative will ensure that conformance samples are removed for testing by the\n2 Geosynthetics CQA Laboratory from the closest numerical roll on both sides of the roll from\n3 which the failing sample was obtained. These two samples must pass the above conformance\n4 tests. If either of these samples fails to meet the requirements, samples will be collected from the\n5 five numerically closest untested rolls on both sides of the failed samples and tested by the\n6 Geosynthetics CQA Laboratory. These ten samples must pass the above conformance tests. If\n7 any of these samples fail, a sample from every roll of GCL onsite and a sample from every roll\n8 that is subsequently delivered from the same manufacturer must be conformance tested by the\n9 Geosynthetics CQA Laboratory until the manufacturer has thoroughly demonstrated compliance\n10 with the above requirements to the sole satisfaction of the CQA certifying engineer. The costs of\n11 all such tests are to be borne by the construction general contractor.\n12 * The CQA representative will document actions taken in conjunction with conformance test\n13 failures as outlined in Section 8.1.4 and report all actions to the CQA certifying officer.\n14 3.2 Geosynthetic Clay Liner Installation\n15 3.2.1 Surface Preparation\n16 For fill surfaces that will underlay a GCL layer, the CQA representative will verify and document the\n17 following:\n18 * The surface of the fill does not contain holes, ruts, protrusions, or other surface irregularities in\n19 excess of those dimensions specified by the technical specifications.\n20 * The surface of the fill has been compacted to form a firm, stable base.\n21 * The surface of the fill is free of any type of deleterious material that may cause damage to GCL,\n22 including debris, organic material, frozen soil, ice, and rocks.\n23 * The surface of the fill is free of standing water or excessive moisture.\n24 * The construction general contractor has certified in writing that the surface on which the GCL\n25 will be installed is acceptable.\n26 The subgrade surface will be inspected immediately prior to commencement of GCL installation. If any\n27 change in the surface requires repair work, in accordance with the technical specifications, the\n28 construction general contractor will be responsible for repairing the fill surface.\n29 A certificate of subgrade surface acceptance will be required from the construction general contractor.\n30 The CQA representative will verify that the subgrade is accepted by the GCL installer, immediately prior\n31 to commencement of GCL installation.\n32 After the surface on which the GCL is to be installed has been accepted by the construction general\n33 contractor, it will be the CQA representative's responsibility to indicate to the CQA certifying engineer\n34 any change in the underlying layer that may, in accordance with the technical specifications, require\n35 repair work. If the CQA certifying engineer requires that repair work be done, it will be the responsibility\n36 of the construction general contractor to repair the underlying layer.\n37 3.2.2 Anchor Trenches and Sumps\n38 Prior to placement of geosynthetics in the anchor trenches or sumps, the CQA representative will verify\n39 and document the following:\n40 * The sumps and anchor trenches are excavated to the grades and dimensions shown in the\n41 construction drawings. Any anomalies in the soil encountered during excavation will be brought\n42 to the attention of the IDF project engineer and removed as directed.\n43 * The anchor trench excavation surface is prepared for installation of geosynthetics, with rounded\n44 corners, and free of loose soil or deleterious material.\nAppendix 4B.38\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 After geosynthetics deployment into the anchor trench is complete, the CQA representative will verify\n2 and document that the backfill for the geosynthetic anchor trenches is placed and compacted in\n3 accordance with the technical specifications.\n4 3.2.3 Geosynthetic Clay Liner Deployment\n5 3.2.3.1 Field Panel Identification\n6 A field panel is the unit area of GCL that is to be placed in the field (i.e., a field panel is a roll or a portion\n7 of roll cut in the field).\n8 The CQA representative will track the placement location of each GCL panel by assigning an\n9 identification code (number or letter-number) or by an equivalent tracking method. The identification\n10 method will be agreed upon by the CQA certifying engineer and the construction general contractor. This\n11 field panel identification scheme will be as simple and logical as possible. (Note: manufacturing plant\n12 roll numbers are usually cumbersome and are not related to location in the field.) It will be the\n13 responsibility of the construction general contractor to ensure that each field panel placed is marked with\n14 the manufacturing plant roll number. The roll number will be marked in the center of the panel in a color\n15 to allow for easy inspection.\n16 The CQA representative will establish a table or chart showing correspondence between manufacturing\n17 plant roll numbers and field panel identification codes. The field panel identification code will be used\n18 for all CQA records.\n19 3.2.3.2 Field Panel Placement\n20 Installation Schedule\n21 The CQA representative will evaluate significant changes in the schedule, proposed by the construction\n22 general contractor, and will advise the CQA certifying engineer on the acceptability of that change. The\n23 CQA representative will verify and document that the condition of the underlying layer has not changed\n24 detrimentally during installation. Any damage to the surface of the underlying layer will be repaired by\n25 the construction general contractor, in accordance with the technical specifications.\n26 Weather Conditions\n27 The CQA representative will verify and document that GCL is not placed during inclement weather\n28 conditions, as specified in the technical specifications. Additionally, the CQA monitor will verify and\n29 document that the existing underlying layer has not been damaged by weather conditions.\n30 Damage\n31 The CQA representative will visually observe each panel, after placement, for damage. The CQA\n32 representative will inform the construction general contractor which panels, or portions of panels, are\n33 rejected, repaired, or accepted. Damaged panels or portions of damaged panels that have been rejected by\n34 the CQA representative will be marked, and their removal from the work area will be documented by the\n35 CQA representative.\n36 Seam Overlap and Bentonite Seal\n37 The construction general contractor will observe and document that the seam overlaps and bentonite\n38 material placed between panels, if required, along the seams meets specification guidelines. The CQA\n39 representative will verify overlap width and will observe bentonite seal placement.\n40 3.2.3.3 Field Panel Protection\n41 The CQA representative will observe and document that the GCL is completely covered with\n42 geomembrane or protective plastic cover at the end of each workday and protected from damage and\n43 hydration due to weather. The CQA representative will verify and document that equipment does not\n44 operate directly on the GCL and that a smooth rub sheet is used to maneuver textured geomembrane over\n45 the GCL to prevent damage to the GCL.\nAppendix 4B.39\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 3.2.4 Defects and Repairs\n2 Any defects and subsequent repairs will be documented, using NCR procedures outlined in Section 8.1.4.\n3 3.2.4.1 Identification\n4 All seams and non-seam areas of the GCL will be inspected by the CQA representative for evidence of\n5 defects, holes, contamination of geotextiles, displaced panels, premature hydration, and any sign of\n6 contamination by foreign matter. The CQA representative will observe and document repair procedures\n7 described below.\n8 3.2.4.2 Repair Procedures\n9 Prior to cover material placement, damage to the GCL will be identified and repaired by the installer.\n10 Rip and Tear Repair (Flat Surfaces)\n11 Rips or tears may be repaired by completely exposing the affected area, removing all foreign objects or\n12 soil, and by then placing a patch cut from unused GCL over the damage (damaged material may be left in\n13 place), with a minimum overlap of 12 inches on all edges.\n14 Accessory bentonite will be placed between the patch edges and the repaired material at a rate of a quarter\n15 pound per lineal foot of edge, spread in a continuous 6-inch fillet.\n16 Rip and Tear Repair (Slopes)\n17 Damaged GCL material on slopes will be repaired by the same procedures as described above, however,\n18 the overlapped edges of the patch need to be wide enough to ensure the patch will keep its position during\n19 backfill or cover operations.\n20 Displaced Panels\n21 Displaced panels will be adjusted to the correct position and orientation. The adjusted panel will then be\n22 inspected for any geotextile damage or bentonite loss. Damage will be repaired by the above-described\n23 procedure.\n24 Premature Hydration\n25 If the GCL is subjected to premature hydration, the construction general contractor will notify the CQA\n26 certifying engineer for a site-specific determination as to whether the material is acceptable or if\n27 alternative measures must be taken to ensure the quality of the design dependent upon the degree of\n28 damage.\n29\nAppendix 4B.40\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 4 GEOMEMBRANE CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE\n2 4.1 Geomembrane Material\n3 4.1.1 Labeling\n4 The CQA representative will verify and document that the geomembrane manufacturer has labeled each\n5 roll of geomembrane and includes the information required by the technical specifications. The CQA\n6 representative will examine geomembrane rolls upon delivery and deviation from the requirements will\n7 be reported to the CQA certifying engineer, prior to installation of the geomembrane.\n8 4.1.2 Transportation and Handling\n9 Upon delivery at the site, the CQA representative will conduct a visual inspection of all rolls for defects\n10 and damage. This examination will be conducted without unrolling rolls unless visible defects or damage\n11 is found. The CQA representative will indicate the following to the CQA certifying engineer:\n12 * Any rolls that need to be unrolled to allow for their inspection.\n13 * Any rolls, or portions thereof, that need to be rejected and removed from the site because they\n14 have severe flaws.\n15 * Any rolls that include minor repairable flaws.\n16 4.1.3 Storage\n17 The CQA representative will verify and document that storage of the geomembrane is in accordance with\n18 the technical specifications.\n19 4.1.4 Inventory\n20 All geosynthetic materials that arrive onsite will be inventoried in accordance with the technical\n21 specifications. The inventory will include the specific roll numbers delivered with each shipment. The\n22 inventory will be compared to the QC testing information supplied by the manufacturer to ensure that the\n23 material tested is the same material that was delivered to the site. Material for which QC testing data has\n24 been supplied will be sampled for conformance testing. Conformance samples may be obtained by the\n25 CQA representative at the manufacturing plant or taken upon delivery of the material to the site by a CQA\n26 representative. As shipments arrive at the site, a CQA representative will monitor the unloading\n27 operations and will inventory the material. Rolls selected for conformance testing will be set aside for\n28 sampling as soon as possible.\n29 The CQA representative will record the following information, at a minimum, for each roll:\n30 * Manufacturer-indicate the manufacturer of the material that is being inventoried, that may not\n31 be the same as the installer.\n32 * Date of Inventory-Date that the material was inventoried.\n33 * Date of Delivery-Enter date when the truck arrived onsite, if known.\n34 * Truck Type-Indicate type of truck used for shipping geosynthetics (covered or uncovered\n35 flatbed, box trailer).\n36 * Bill-of-Lading Number-If the bill-of-lading is available, indicate number and date (also attach\n37 copy to inventory form).\n38 * CQA Representative-Indicate name of CQA representative performing inventory.\n39 * Unloading Equipment-Indicate the type and model number of the equipment unloading the\n40 geosynthetic material; also note any special attachments that are used to unload the material\n41 (stinger, straps, forks).\n42 * Weather Conditions-Describe the weather conditions, including temperature, wind, cloud cover,\n43 and precipitation during unloading and conformance sampling operation.\n44 * Material Type-Indicate type of geosynthetic material (HDPE, geotextile, or geonet)\nAppendix 4B.41\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * Roll Number-Indicate each roll number that is indicated on the roll. (The roll numbers contain a\n2 variety of information regarding the material and the manufacture process.)\n3 * Lot Number-Lot number as indicated.\n4 * Roll (L x W)-Indicate the roll width as indicated on the roll label; if two materials are bonded\n5 together (i.e., geonet/geotextile), obtain measurements for both materials.\n6 * Area (square feet)-Indicate the total square footage of the roll.\n7 * Damage Remarks-Document any visible damage to the roll; if possible, indicate if damage was\n8 present prior to unloading or if it occurred during unloading.\n9 Items that are restricted from further use until the inspections have been completed will be clearly\n10 delineated by the CQA representative. Accepted materials will be kept separate or clearly delineated\n11 from inventoried and approved items to the extent possible. The CQA representative will be responsible\n12 for coordinating with the construction general contractor during material delivery, so that the material is\n13 not moved more than necessary after it is unloaded and damage due to handling is minimized.\n14 The CQA representative will perform the inventory immediately after the material arrives onsite to avoid\n15 delaying construction. The CQA representative will be responsible for verifying that only accepted\n16 material is installed at the IDF landfill, and that all inventories and inspections are documented and\n17 maintained.\n18 4.1.5 Quality Assurance Conformance Testing\n19 Either at the manufacturer's plant or upon delivery of the rolls of geomembrane, the CQA representative\n20 will ensure that samples are removed at the specified frequency and forwarded to the Geosynthetics CQA\n21 Laboratory for testing to verify and document conformance with the technical specifications.\n22 Conformance samples will be taken by the CQA representative across the entire width of the roll and will\n23 not include the first 3 feet. Unless otherwise specified, samples will be 3 feet (minimum) long by the roll\n24 width. The CQA representative will mark the direction of the machine used to cut the samples with an\n25 arrow.\n26 Unless otherwise specified, samples will be taken at a rate of one per lot or one per 50,000 square feet,\n27 whichever is greater. These samples will be tested for:\n28 * Thickness (ASTM D5199 or D5994).\n29 * Tensile characteristics (yield strength and elongation at yield, ASTM D638).\n30 * Asperity (GRI GM-12).\n31 * Puncture resistance (ASTM D4833).\n32 Test will be conducted in accordance with the test procedure presented in the technical specifications.\n33 The CQA representative will examine all results from laboratory conformance testing and will report any\n34 non-conformance after the test results become available. The following procedure will apply whenever a\n35 sample fails a conformance test that is conducted by the CQA representative:\n36 * The construction general contractor will be required to replace the roll (or rolls) of geomembrane\n37 in non-conformance with the technical specifications with a roll, that meets the technical\n38 specifications.\n39 * The CQA certifying engineer will ensure that conformance samples are removed for testing by\n40 the Geosynthetics CQA Laboratory from the closest numerical roll on both sides of the failed roll.\n41 These two samples must pass the above conformance tests. If either of these samples fails,\n42 samples will be collected from the five numerically closest untested rolls on both sides of the\n43 failed sample and tested by the Geosynthetics CQA Laboratory. These ten samples must pass the\n44 above conformance tests.\nAppendix 4B.42\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 If any of these samples fail, a sample from every roll of geomembrane onsite and every roll\n2 subsequently delivered from the same manufacturer must be conformance tested by the\n3 Geosynthetics CQA Laboratory, until the manufacturer has thoroughly demonstrated compliance\n4 with the above requirements to the sole satisfaction of the CQA certifying engineer. The costs of\n5 all such tests are to be borne by the construction general contractor.\n6 4.1.6 Manufacturing Plant Site Visit\n7 The manufacturer shall allow the CQA certifying engineer or his designated representative to visit the\n8 manufacturing plant, if the CQA certifying engineer so chooses. If possible, the visit shall be prior to or\n9 during the manufacturing of the geomembrane rolls for the specific project. The CQA Engineer or his\n10 designated representative shall review the manufacturing process, quality control, laboratory facilities,\n11 and testing procedures as described in the technical specifications (see Section 02661).\n12 4.2 Installation\n13 4.2.1 Surface Preparation\n14 For SBL surfaces that will underlay a geomembrane layer, the CQA representative will verify and\n15 document the following:\n16 * The surface of the subgrade or SBL does not contain holes, depressions, or protrusions in excess\n17 of those dimensions specified by the technical specifications.\n18 * The surface of the subgrade or SBL has been rolled with a smooth-drum roller to form a firm\n19 stable base without ridges, wheel ruts, and surface irregularities.\n20 * The surface of the subgrade or SBL is free of any type of deleterious material that may cause\n21 damage to geomembrane.\n22 * The construction general contractor has certified in writing that the surface on which the\n23 geomembrane will be installed is acceptable.\n24 The subgrade and SBL surface will be inspected immediately prior to commencement of geomembrane\n25 installation. If any change in the surface requires repair work, in accordance with the technical\n26 specifications, the construction general contractor will be responsible for repairing the surface. A\n27 certificate of subgrade surface acceptance will be required from the construction general contractor. The\n28 CQA representative will verify that the subgrade is accepted by the geomembrane installer immediately\n29 prior to commencement of geomembrane installation.\n30 After the surface on which the geomembrane is to be installed has been accepted by the construction\n31 general contractor, it will be the CQA representative's responsibility to indicate to the CQA certifying\n32 engineer any change in the underlying layer that may, in accordance with the technical specifications,\n33 require repair work. If the CQA certifying engineer requires that repair work be done, it will be the\n34 responsibility of the construction general contractor to repair the underlying layer.\n35 4.2.2 Anchor Trenches and Sumps\n36 Prior to placement of geosynthetics in the anchor trenches or sumps, the CQA representative will verify\n37 and document the following:\n38 * The excavation of the sumps and anchor trenches is performed in accordance with the technical\n39 specifications. Any anomalies in the soil encountered during excavation will be brought to the\n40 attention of the IDF project engineer and removed as directed.\n41 * The anchor trench excavation surface is prepared for installation of geosynthetics with rounded\n42 corners and is free of loose soil or deleterious material.\n43 After geosynthetics deployment into the anchor trench is complete, the CQA representative will verify\n44 and document that the backfill for the geosynthetic anchor trenches is placed and compacted in\n45 accordance with the technical specifications and construction drawings.\nAppendix 4B.43\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 4.2.3 Geomembrane Deployment\n2 4.2.3.1 Layout Drawing\n3 The construction general contractor will be required to produce layout drawings that show the\n4 geomembrane panel configuration, dimensions, details, and seam locations. The layout drawings must be\n5 approved by the CQA certifying engineer, prior to the installation of the geomembrane.\n6 4.2.3.2 Field Panel Identification\n7 A field panel is the unit area of geomembrane that is to be seamed in the field (i.e., a field panel is a roll\n8 or a portion of roll cut in the field).\n9 The CQA representative will verify that each field panel is given an identification code (number or letter-\n10 number) consistent with the layout plan. This identification code will be agreed upon by the CQA\n11 representative and the construction general contractor. This field panel identification code will be as\n12 simple and logical as possible. (Note: manufacturing plant roll numbers are usually cumbersome and are\n13 not related to location in the field.) It will be the responsibility of the construction general contractor to\n14 ensure that each field panel placed is marked with the manufacturing plant roll number. The roll number\n15 will be marked in the center of the panel in a color to allow for easy inspection.\n16 The CQA representative will establish a table or chart showing correspondence between manufacturing\n17 plant roll numbers and field panel identification codes. The field panel identification code will be used for\n18 all CQA records.\n19 4.2.3.3 Field Panel Placement\n20 Location\n21 The CQA representative will verify and document that field panels are installed at the locations and\n22 positions indicated in the construction general contractor's layout plan, as approved or modified by the\n23 CQA certifying engineer.\n24 Installation Schedule\n25 The CQA representative will evaluate significant changes in the schedule, proposed by the construction\n26 general contractor, and will advise the CQA certifying engineer on the acceptability of that change. The\n27 CQA representative will verify and document that the condition of the underlying layer has not changed\n28 detrimentally during installation. Any damage to the surface of the underlying layer will be repaired by\n29 the construction general contractor in accordance with the technical specifications.\n30 The CQA representative will record the identification code, location, and date of installation of each field\n31 panel.\n32 Weather Conditions\n33 The CQA representative will verify and document that geomembrane is not placed during inclement\n34 weather conditions, as specified in the technical specifications. Additionally, the CQA representative will\n35 verify and document that the underlying layer has not been damaged by weather conditions.\n36 Damage\n37 The CQA representatives will visually observe each panel, after placement and prior to seaming, for\n38 damage (e.g., holes, blisters, and creases). The CQA representative will inform the construction general\n39 contractor which panels, or portions of panels, need to be rejected, repaired, or accepted. Damaged panels\n40 or portions of damaged panels that have been rejected by the CQA certifying engineer will be marked,\n41 and their removal from the work area will be documented by the CQA representative, using the NCR\n42 procedures outlined in Section 8.1.4.\nAppendix 4B.44\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 4.2.4 Field Seaming\n2 4.2.4.1 Seam Layout\n3 The CQA certifying engineer will verify and document that the seam layout shown in the panel layout\n4 drawing is consistent with the technical specifications. A seam numbering system compatible with the\n5 panel numbering system will be agreed upon by the construction general contractor and CQA certifying\n6 engineer.\n7 4.2.4.2 Seaming Equipment and Products\n8 Processes approved by the technical specifications for field seaming are extrusion seaming; and fusion\n9 seaming. Proposed alternate processes will be required to be documented and submitted to the CQA\n10 certifying engineer for approval. The construction general contractor will be required to use a pyrometer\n11 to ensure that accurate temperatures of the extrudate and seamer nozzle are being achieved.\n12 The extrusion seaming apparatus will be equipped with gauges, indicating the temperatures of the\n13 extrudate and nozzle. The construction general contractor will be required to provide to the CQA\n14 certifying engineer the manufacturer's certification that the extrudate is compatible with the\n15 geomembrane material and is comprised of the same resin as the geomembrane.\n16 The CQA representative will log ambient temperatures, seaming apparatus temperatures, and extrudate\n17 temperatures or fusion seaming apparatus speeds. Ambient temperatures will be measured to verify\n18 compliance with the technical specifications.\n19 4.2.4.3 Seam Preparation\n20 The CQA certifying engineer will verify and document the following:\n21 * Prior to seaming, the seam area is clean and free of moisture, dust, dirt, debris, and foreign\n22 material.\n23 * Preparation of seams is in accordance with the technical specifications.\n24 4.2.4.4 Weather Conditions for Seaming\n25 The CQA representative will verify and document that weather conditions for seaming are within the\n26 limits specified in the technical specifications.\n27 4.2.4.5 Trial Seams\n28 The construction general contractor will be required to make trial seams on fragment pieces of\n29 geomembrane liner to verify that seaming conditions are adequate. The construction general contractor\n30 will be required to make and test trial seams at the frequency and in accordance with the methods\n31 specified in the technical specifications.\n32 The CQA representative will observe all trial seam procedures. The trial seam samples will be assigned a\n33 number and marked accordingly by the CQA representative, along with the date, hour, ambient\n34 temperature, number of seaming unit, name of seamer, and pass or fail description. A sample of the trial\n35 seam will be retained by the CQA team until the construction of the liner is complete and the liner has\n36 been accepted by the CQA certifying engineer.\n37 4.2.4.6 Nondestructive Seam Continuity Testing\n38 Except as otherwise noted in the technical specifications, the construction general contractor will\n39 nondestructively test all field seams over their full length, in accordance with the technical specifications.\n40 The purpose of nondestructive tests is to check the continuity of seams. Continuity testing will be carried\n41 out as the seaming work progresses, not at the completion of all field seaming.\n42\nAppendix 4B.45\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Nondestructive testing will not be permitted before sunrise or after sunset unless the construction general\n2 contractor demonstrates to the CQA certifying engineer that the construction general contractor has the\n3 capabilities to perform continuity testing under reduced light conditions. The CQA representative will\n4 perform the following tasks:\n5 * Observe the continuity testing.\n6 * Record location, date, test unit number, name of tester, and outcome of all testing\n7 * Document and inform the construction general contractor of any required repairs.\n8 The construction general contractor will be required to complete any required repairs, in accordance with\n9 the technical specifications. The CQA representative will perform the following tasks:\n10 * Observe the repair and re-testing of the repair.\n11 * Mark on the geomembrane that the repair has been made.\n12 * Document the results.\n13 The CQA representative will verify and document the procedures specified in the technical specifications\n14 where seams cannot be nondestructively tested. The location, date of visual observation, name of tester,\n15 and outcome of the test or observation will be recorded by the CQA representative and reported to the\n16 CQA certifying engineer.\n17 4.2.4.7 Destructive Seam Testing\n18 Concept\n19 Destructive seam tests will be performed at selected locations. The purpose of these tests is to evaluate\n20 seam strength and integrity. Seam strength testing will be done as the seaming work progresses, not at\n21 the completion of all field seaming.\n22 Location and Frequency\n23 The CQA representative will select locations where seam samples will be cut out for laboratory testing at\n24 the frequency specified in the technical specifications (see Section 02661). In general, destructive tests\n25 will be located in non-critical areas, such as seam run-out areas or near three-panel intersections or other\n26 areas that will require a patch anyway. In addition, because extrusion welding may be limited on a daily\n27 basis, extrusion destructive samples may be welded after passing a trial seam on scrap material not used\n28 for construction. However, when significant lengths (greater than 100 feet) of seams or caps are extrusion\n29 welded, a destructive test of the weld will be taken.\n30 Control charts will be used to track the performance of each welding machine and technician to allow for\n31 biased sampling, according to performance. An upper control limit (UCL) will be established to identify\n32 statistically the sources of test failures. Machines and technicians whose failure rates exceed the UCL\n33 will then be identified and destructively tested at twice the original frequency (one per 250 feet of seam\n34 length) to better monitor their performance. Once the failure rate drops back into compliance with the\n35 UCL, the original testing frequency will be reinstated. Machines and technicians whose failure notes are\n36 below the UCL will be identified to decrease the original frequency, as approved by the CQA certifying\n37 engineer.\n38 The UCL is established based on the failure rate for all destructive tests plus three standard deviations\n39 with a ceiling of 3.5 percent. The ceiling is the maximum failure rate determined to be acceptable, as\n40 agreed upon jointly by the construction general contractor and CQA certifying engineer. The initial UCL\n41 will be calculated once a single machine or technician fails two destructive tests and will typically be\n42 updated daily with the most recent destructive testing results. Destructive tests tracking a failed\n43 destructive will not be included in the calculation of the failure rates.\n44\n45\nAppendix 4B.46\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Additional destructive test locations may be required during seaming operations. The necessity for such\n2 additional sampling and testing will be determined by CQA representatives and will be implemented\n3 when there is cause to suspect the presence of excess crystallinity, contamination, offset welds, or any\n4 other reason to suspect potentially defective seams. The location selection of the additional testing will\n5 be based on the CQA representative's judgment and observation of a suspected problem.\n6 The construction general contractor will not be informed in advance of the locations where the seam\n7 samples will be taken.\n8 Sampling Procedure\n9 The construction general contractor will be required to cut samples, as directed by the CQA representative\n10 as the seaming progresses, in order to have laboratory test results before the geomembrane is covered by\n11 another material. The CQA representative will perform the following tasks:\n12 * Observe sample cutting.\n13 * Assign a number to each sample and mark it accordingly.\n14 * Record the sample number and location on the panel layout drawing.\n15 * Record the reason for taking the sample at this location (e.g., routine testing, suspicious feature of\n16 the geomembrane).\n17 All holes in the geomembrane resulting from destructive seam sampling will be covered by the\n18 construction general contractor immediately after sampling and will be repaired in accordance with the\n19 repair procedures described in the technical specifications. The continuity of the new seams in the\n20 repaired area will be nondestructively tested, according to the technical specifications.\n21 Size of Samples\n22 At a given sampling location, two types of samples will be taken by the construction general contractor.\n23 First, two specimens for field-testing will be taken. Each of these specimens will be 1 inch wide by 6 to\n24 12 inches long, with the seam centered parallel to the width. The distance between these two specimens\n25 will be approximately 42 inches. If both specimens pass the field test described in the technical\n26 specifications, a sample for laboratory testing will be taken.\n27 The sample for laboratory testing will be required to be taken between the two specimens for field-testing.\n28 The destructive sample will be 12 inches wide by 42 inches long, with the seam centered lengthwise. The\n29 sample will be cut into three parts and distributed as follows:\n30 * One portion to the construction general contractor, 12 inches long.\n31 * One portion to the IDF CM for archive storage, 12 inches long.\n32 * One portion to the CQA certifying engineer for CQA Laboratory testing, 18 inches long.\n33 Final determination of the sample sizes will be made at the preconstruction meeting.\n34 Field Testing\n35 The two 1-inch-wide specimens, as specified above, will be required to be tested in the field by the CQA\n36 representative by tensiometer for peel and shear and need not to fail in the seam. If any field test sample\n37 fails to pass, the procedures outlined in the technical specifications will be followed.\n38 The CQA representative will mark all samples and portions with their number, date, and time.\n39 Geosynthetic Construction Quality Assurance Laboratory Testing\n40 Laboratory destructive test samples will be packaged and shipped to the Geosynthetics CQA Laboratory\n41 by the CQA representative in a manner that will not damage the test sample. The CQA representative\n42 will store the archive samples until the completion of the project.\n43 Testing will include \"Shear Strength\" and \"Peel Strength\" (ASTM D6392) with 1-inch-wide strip, tested\n44 at 2 inches per minute. The minimum acceptable values to be obtained in these tests are those indicated in\n45 the technical specifications. At least five specimens will be tested for each test method.\nAppendix 4B.47\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Specimens will be selected alternately by test from the samples (i.e., peel, shear, peel, and shear). At least\n2 four out of five of the specimens for each test must pass.\n3 The laboratory will provide test results verbally to the CQA certifying engineer in a timely manner after\n4 they receive and test the samples. The CQA certifying engineer will review laboratory test results as soon\n5 as they become available and will inform the CQA certifying engineer of the test results.\n6 Procedures for Destructive Test Failure\n7 The procedures specified in the technical specifications will be required whenever a sample fails a\n8 destructive test, whether that test is conducted by the Geosynthetics CQA Laboratory or by field\n9 tensiometer. The CQA certifying engineer will verify and document that one of the options specified in\n10 the technical specifications is followed. The CQA representative will document all actions taken in\n11 conjunction with destructive test failures, including preparation of NCRs, as outlined in Section 8.1.4.\n12 4.2.5 Defects and Repairs\n13 4.2.5.1 Identification\n14 All seams and non-seam areas of the geomembrane will be inspected by the CQA representative for\n15 evidence of defects, holes, blisters, undispersed raw materials, and any sign of contamination by foreign\n16 matter. Because light reflected by the geomembrane helps to detect defects, the surface of the\n17 geomembrane will be required to be clean at the time of examination. The geomembrane surface will be\n18 required to be swept or washed by the construction general contractor if the amount of dust or mud\n19 inhibits examination.\n20 4.2.5.2 Evaluation\n21 Each suspect location both in seam and non-seam areas will be required to be either non-destructively\n22 tested using the methods described in the technical specifications, or repaired as appropriate as\n23 determined by the CQA certifying engineer. Each location that fails the non-destructive testing will be\n24 marked by the CQA representative and will be required to be repaired by the construction general\n25 contractor. Materials will not be placed over geomembrane locations that have been repaired until the\n26 CQA representative has approved the repair.\n27 4.2.5.3 Large Wrinkles\n28 When seaming of the geomembrane is completed (or when seaming of a large area of the geomembrane is\n29 completed) and prior to placing overlying materials, the CQA representative will visually inspect the\n30 geomembrane for wrinkles. Based on the requirements of the technical specifications, the CQA\n31 representative will indicate to the construction general contractor, which wrinkles, if any, are to be cut,\n32 overlapped, and seamed to remove the wrinkle. The seam thus produced will be tested like any other\n33 seam.\n34 4.2.5.4 Repair Procedures\n35 Any portion of the geomembrane either exhibiting a flaw or failing a destructive or nondestructive test\n36 will be repaired by the construction general contractor in accordance with the applicable method specified\n37 in the technical specifications. An NCR will be prepared to document all flaws and failed tests, as\n38 outlined in Section 8.1.4. Each repair will be located and logged by the CQA representative.\n39 4.2.5.5 Testing of Repairs\n40 Each repair will be non-destructively tested, using the methods described in the technical specifications as\n41 appropriate. Repairs that pass the non-destructive test will be considered adequate. Large caps may be of\n42 sufficient extent to require destructive testing, at the discretion of the CQA certifying engineer. Failed\n43 tests will require the repair to be redone and re-tested until passing test results are obtained. The CQA\n44 representative will observe the non-destructive testing of repairs and will document the date of the repair\n45 and test outcome.\nAppendix 4B.48\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 4.2.6 Appurtenances\n2 The CQA representative will verify and document the following:\n3 * Installation of the geomembrane around, and connection of geomembrane to, appurtenances have\n4 been made according to the technical specifications or manufacturer's recommendations.\n5 * Extreme care is taken while seaming around appurtenances, since neither non-destructive nor\n6 destructive testing may be feasible in these areas.\n7 * The geomembrane has not been visibly damaged while being connected to appurtenances.\n8 The CQA representative will inform the CQA certifying engineer if the above conditions are not fulfilled.\n9 4.3 Geomembrane Panel Layout Survey\n10 A survey will be performed by or under the direction of a professional land surveyor registered in the\n11 State of Washington. The surveyor will independently survey the elevations and location of each panel\n12 intersection and destructive sample. The results of the survey conducted by the surveyor will be compiled\n13 in a report signed by the surveyor and the CQA certifying engineer.\n14 The surveyor will be required to survey each geomembrane panel intersection and destructive sample\n15 location for the IDF landfill, in accordance with the requirements of this CQA Plan. A record drawing\n16 will be submitted to the CQA certifying engineer by the surveyor. The survey will include enough\n17 information to confirm that the geomembrane layout is in accordance with the panel layout and include,\n18 but not be limited to, the following information:\n19 Geomembrane panel intersections:\n20 * Destructive sample location and identification\n21 * Edge of geomembrane liner\n22 * Panel identification numbers\n23 Each geomembrane layer will be surveyed including, but not be limited to:\n24 * Secondary leak detection system geomembrane\n25 * Secondary geomembrane\n26 * Primary geomembrane\n27 4.4 Layer Completion Certification\n28 The construction general contractor will be required to notify the CQA representative when an area of\n29 geomembrane is complete, prior to constructing the overlying layer. The construction general contractor\n30 may place overlying layer after acceptance of geomembrane layer by the CQA Certifying Engineer. The\n31 CQA certifying engineer will provide a certificate of layer completion to the construction general\n32 contractor and the IDF project engineer, certifying that all CQA tests are complete and all defects have\n33 been repaired and tested.\n34\nAppendix 4B.49\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 5 GEOTEXTILE CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE\n2 5.1 Geotextile Material And Installation\n3 5.1.1 Labeling\n4 The CQA representative will verify and document that the geotextile manufacturer has labeled all rolls of\n5 geotextile with the information specified in the technical specifications. The CQA representative will\n6 examine rolls upon delivery, and any deviation from the requirements will be reported to the CQA\n7 certifying engineer. Geotextile rolls that are not labeled or that have illegible labels will be removed and\n8 disposed by the construction general contractor.\n9 5.1.2 Transportation and Handling\n10 The CQA representative will observe rolls of geotextile upon delivery at the site, and any deviation from\n11 the transportation and handling requirements specified in the technical specifications will be reported to\n12 the CQA certifying engineer. Any damaged rolls will be rejected by the CQA certifying engineer and\n13 required to be repaired or replaced by the construction general contractor.\n14 5.1.3 Storage\n15 The CQA representative will verify and document that storage of the geotextile is in accordance with the\n16 technical specifications.\n17 5.1.4 Inventory\n18 All geotextile materials that arrive onsite will be inventoried. The inventory will include the specific roll\n19 numbers delivered with each shipment. The inventory will be compared to the QC testing information,\n20 supplied by the manufacturer to ensure that the material tested is the same material that was delivered to\n21 the site. Material for which QC testing data has been supplied will be sampled for conformance testing.\n22 Conformance samples may be obtained by the CQA representative at the manufacturing plant or taken\n23 upon delivery of the material to the site by a CQA representative.\n24 As shipments arrive at the site, a CQA representative will monitor the unloading operations and will\n25 inventory the material. Rolls selected for conformance testing will be set aside for sampling as soon as\n26 possible.\n27 The CQA representative will record the following information, at a minimum, for each roll:\n28 * Manufacturer-Indicate the manufacturer of the material that is being inventoried, that may not\n29 be the same as the installer.\n30 * Date of Inventory-Date that the material was inventoried.\n31 * Date of Delivery-Enter date when the truck arrived onsite, if known.\n32 * Truck Type-Indicate type of truck used for shipping geosynthetics (covered or uncovered\n33 flatbed, box trailer).\n34 * Bill-of-Lading Number-If the bill-of-lading is available, indicate number and date (also attach\n35 copy to inventory form).\n36 * CQA Representative-Indicate name of CQA representative performing inventory.\n37 * Unloading Equipment-Indicate the type and model number of the equipment unloading the\n38 geosynthetic material; also note any special attachments that are used to unload the material\n39 (stinger, straps, forks).\n40 * Weather Conditions-Describe the weather conditions, including temperature, wind, cloud cover,\n41 and precipitation during unloading and conformance sampling operation.\n42 * Material Type-Indicate type of geosynthetic material.\n43 * Roll Number-Indicate each roll number that is indicated on the roll.\n44 * Lot Number-Lot number.\nAppendix 4B.50\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * Roll (Lx W)-Indicate the roll width as indicated on the roll label; if two materials are bonded\n2 together (i.e., geonet/geotextile), obtain measurements for both materials.\n3 * Area (square feet)-Indicate the total square footage of the roll.\n4 * Damage Remarks-Document any visible damage to the roll; if possible, indicate if damage was\n5 present prior to unloading or if it occurred during unloading.\n6 Items that are restricted from further use until the inspections have been completed will be clearly\n7 delineated by the CQA representative. Accepted materials will be kept separate or clearly delineated\n8 from inventoried and approved items to the extent possible. The CQA representative will coordinate with\n9 the construction general contractor during material delivery so that the material is not moved more than\n10 necessary after it is unloaded and damage due to handling is minimized.\n11 The CQA representative will perform the inventory immediately after the material arrives onsite to avoid\n12 delaying construction. The CQA representative will be responsible for verifying that only accepted\n13 material is installed at the IDF landfill and that all inventories and inspections are documented and\n14 maintained.\n15 5.1.5 Conformance Testing\n16 Either at the manufacturer's factory or upon delivery of the geotextile rolls, the CQA representative will\n17 ensure that samples are removed and forwarded to the Geosynthetics CQA Laboratory for testing to\n18 verify and document conformance with the requirements of the technical specifications. Conformance\n19 samples will be taken across the entire width of the roll and will not include the first 3 feet along the edge\n20 of the roll. Unless otherwise specified, samples will be 3 feet (minimum) long by the roll width. The\n21 CQA representative will mark the machine direction on the samples with an arrow.\n22 Samples will be taken at a rate of one per material lot or one per 50,000 square foot, whichever is greater.\n23 These samples will be tested for the following:\n24 * Permittivity (ASTM D4491, Type 1 only).\n25 * Grab strength (ASTM D4632).\n26 * Tear strength (ASTM D4533).\n27 * Puncture strength (ASTM D4833).\n28 The CQA representative will examine all results of laboratory conformance testing and report any non-\n29 conformance to the CQA certifying engineer as soon as results become available. The following\n30 procedure will apply whenever a sample fails a conformance test that is conducted by the Geosynthetics\n31 CQA Laboratory:\n32 * The construction general contractor will replace the roll (or rolls) of geotextile not in\n33 conformance with the specifications with a roll, that meets the requirements of the technical\n34 specifications.\n35 * The CQA representative will ensure that conformance samples are removed for testing by the\n36 Geosynthetics CQA Laboratory from the closest numerical roll on both sides of the roll from\n37 which the failing sample was obtained. These two samples must pass the above conformance\n38 tests. If either of these samples fails to meet the requirements, samples will be collected from the\n39 five numerically closest untested rolls on both sides of the failed sample and tested by the\n40 Geosynthetics CQA Laboratory. These ten samples must pass the above conformance tests. If\n41 any of these samples fail, a sample from every roll of geotextile onsite and a sample from every\n42 roll that is subsequently delivered from the same manufacturer must be conformance tested by the\n43 Geosynthetics CQA Laboratory, until the manufacturer has thoroughly demonstrated compliance\n44 with the above requirements to the sole satisfaction of the CQA certifying engineer. The costs of\n45 all such tests are to be borne by the construction general contractor.\nAppendix 4B.51\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI The CQA representative will document actions taken in conjunction with conformance test failures and\n2 report all actions taken to the CQA certifying engineer. Failed tests will be documented using NCR\n3 procedures, outlined in Section 8.1.4.\n4 5.1.6 Deployment\n5 The construction general contractor will be required to handle all geotextile material in such a manner as\n6 to ensure that it is not damaged in any way.\n7 It will be the CQA representative's responsibility to indicate to the CQA certifying engineer any change\n8 in the underlying layer that may, in accordance with the technical specifications, require repair work. If\n9 the CQA certifying engineer requires that repair work be done, it will be the responsibility of the\n10 construction general contractor to repair the underlying layer.\n11 The CQA representative will verify and document compliance with the following:\n12 * Just prior to geotextile placement, the layer that underlies the geotextile, if it is a geosynthetic, is\n13 clean and free of excessive amounts of dust, dirt, stones, rocks, or other obstructions that could\n14 potentially damage the liner system.\n15 * In the presence of excessive wind, the geotextile is weighted with sandbags (or equivalent weight\n16 approved by the CQA representative).\n17 * Geotextile is kept under tension to minimize the presence of wrinkles in the geotextile. If\n18 necessary, the geotextile is positioned by hand after being unrolled to minimize wrinkles.\n19 * Geotextile is cut using a geotextile cutter approved by the geotextile manufacturer and the CQA\n20 representative. If in place, special care is taken to protect other materials (such as underlying\n21 geosynthetics) from damage that could be caused by the cutting of the geotextiles.\n22 * The construction general contractor takes any necessary precautions to prevent damage to the\n23 underlying layers during placement of the geotextile.\n24 * During placement of geotextile, care is taken not to entrap stones, excessive dust, or moisture that\n25 could damage the underlying layers, generate clogging of drains or filters, or hamper subsequent\n26 seaming.\n27 * Geotextile is not left exposed for an excess of 14 days after placement, to prevent damage from\n28 exposure to ultraviolet radiation (sunlight). If the geotextile is exposed for more than 14 days, a\n29 temporary cover may be deployed for the duration of the delay or samples may be submitted to an\n30 independent testing laboratory to ensure that detrimental levels of UV degradation have not\n31 occurred. Test results shall be submitted to CQA certifying engineer for review and approval.\n32 Detrimental level of UV degradation is defined in the technical specifications (see Section\n33 02371).\n34 The CQA representative will document any non-compliance with the above requirements and report them\n35 to the CQA certifying engineer.\n36 5.1.7 Seams and Overlaps\n37 The CQA representative will verify and document that all geotextile seams are oriented and overlapped,\n38 in accordance with the technical specifications. The construction general contractor will be required to\n39 pay close attention at seams to ensure that no protective soil layer material could be inadvertently placed\n40 beneath the geotextile.\n41 5.1.8 Repair\n42 The CQA representative will verify and document that any holes or tears in the geotextile are repaired, in\n43 accordance with the requirements of the technical specifications. The CQA representative will document\n44 any noncompliance with the above requirements and report it to the CQA certifying engineer.\nAppendix 4B.52\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI SECTION 6 COMPOSITE DRAINAGE NET CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE\n2 6.1 Composite Drainage Net Material and Installation\n3 6.1.1 Labeling\n4 The CQA representative will verify and document that the composite drainage net manufacturer has\n5 labeled all rolls of composite drainage net as specified in the technical specifications. The CQA\n6 representative will examine rolls upon delivery, and any deviation from the above requirements will be\n7 reported to the CQA certifying engineer prior to installation of the composite drainage net.\n8 6.1.2 Transportation and Handling\n9 The CQA representative will observe rolls of composite drainage net upon delivery at the site, and any\n10 deviation from the requirements of the technical specifications will be reported to the CQA certifying\n11 engineer. Any damaged rolls will be rejected by the CQA representative and be required to be repaired or\n12 replaced by the construction general contractor.\n13 6.1.3 Storage\n14 The CQA representative will verify and document that the storage of the composite drainage net is in\n15 accordance with the technical specifications.\n16 6.1.4 Inventory\n17 All CDN that arrive onsite will be inventoried. The inventory will record the specific roll numbers\n18 delivered with each shipment. The inventory will be compared to the QC testing information supplied by\n19 the manufacturer, to ensure that the material tested is the same material that was delivered to the site.\n20 Material for which QC testing data has been supplied will be sampled for conformance testing.\n21 Conformance samples may be obtained by the CQA representative at the manufacturing plant or taken\n22 upon delivery of the material to the site by a CQA representative.\n23 As shipments arrive at the site, a CQA representative will monitor the unloading operations and will\n24 inventory the material. Rolls selected for conformance testing will be set aside for sampling as soon as\n25 possible.\n26 The CQA representative will record the following information, at a minimum, for each roll:\n27 * Manufacturer-Indicate the manufacturer of the material that is being inventoried that may not\n28 be the same as the installer.\n29 * Date of Inventory-Date that the material was inventoried.\n30 * Date of Delivery-Enter date when the truck arrived onsite, if known.\n31 * Truck Type-Indicate type of truck used for shipping geosynthetics (covered or uncovered\n32 flatbed, box trailer).\n33 * Bill-of-Lading Number-If the bill-of-lading is available, indicate number and date (also attach\n34 copy to inventory form).\n35 * CQA Representative-Indicate name of CQA representative performing inventory.\n36 * Unloading Equipment-Indicate the type and model number of the equipment unloading the\n37 geosynthetic material; also note any special attachments that are used to unload the material\n38 (stinger, straps, forks).\n39 * Weather Conditions-Describe the weather conditions, including temperature, wind, cloud cover,\n40 and precipitation during unloading and conformance sampling operation.\n41 * Material Type-Indicate type of geosynthetic material (high-density polyethylene, geotextile, or\n42 geonet).\n43 * Roll Number-Indicate each roll number that is written on the roll.\n44 * Lot Number-Lot number as indicated.\nAppendix 4B.53\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * Roll (L x W)-Indicate the roll width as indicated on the roll label; if two materials are bonded\n2 together (i.e., geonet/geotextile), obtain measurements for both materials.\n3 * Area (square feet)-Indicate the total square footage of the roll.\n4 * Damage Remarks-Document any visible damage to the roll; if possible, indicate if damage was\n5 present prior to unloading or if it occurred during unloading.\n6 Items that are restricted from further use until the inspections have been completed will be clearly\n7 delineated by the CQA representative. Accepted materials will be kept separate or clearly delineated\n8 from inventoried and approved items to the extent possible. The CQA representative will coordinate with\n9 the construction general contractor during material delivery so that the material is not moved more than\n10 necessary after it is unloaded and damage due to handling is minimized.\n11 The CQA representative will perform the inventory immediately after the material arrives onsite to avoid\n12 delaying construction. The CQA representative will be responsible for verifying that only accepted\n13 material is installed at the IDF landfill and that all inventories and inspections are documented and\n14 maintained.\n15 6.1.5 Conformance Testing\n16 Either at the manufacturer's plant or upon delivery of the composite drainage net rolls, the CQA\n17 representative will ensure that samples are removed and forwarded to the Geosynthetics CQA Laboratory\n18 for testing, to verify and document conformance with the requirements of the technical specifications.\n19 Conformance samples will be taken across the entire width of the roll and will not include the first 3 feet.\n20 Unless otherwise specified, samples will be 3 feet long (minimum) by the roll width. The CQA\n21 representative will mark the machine direction on the samples with an arrow.\n22 Samples will be taken at a rate of one per lot or one per 50,000 square feet, except as noted otherwise\n23 below, whichever is greater. The geonets will be tested for the following:\n24 * Polymer specific gravity (ASTM D1505).\n25 * Thickness (ASTM D5199).\n26 * Nominal transmissivity (ASTM D4716 -one per production lot).\n27 The composite drainage nets will be tested for the following:\n28 * Adhesion (GRI-GC7 or ASTM D413).\n29 * Transmissivity (ASTM D4716 -one per production lot).\n30 The CQA representative will examine all results from laboratory conformance testing and will report any\n31 non-conformance to the CQA certifying engineer as soon as the results become available.\n32 The following procedure will apply whenever a sample fails a conformance test that is conducted by the\n33 Geosynthetics CQA Laboratory:\n34 * The construction general contractor will be required to replace the roll (or rolls) of composite\n35 drainage net not in conformance with the specifications with a roll that meets the requirements of\n36 the technical specifications.\n37 * The CQA representative will ensure that conformance samples are removed for testing by the\n38 Geosynthetics CQA Laboratory from the closest numerical roll on both sides of the failed roll.\n39 These two samples must pass the above conformance tests. If either of these samples fails,\n40 samples will be collected from the five numerically closest untested rolls on both sides of the\n41 failed sample and tested by the Geosynthetics CQA Laboratory. These ten samples must pass the\n42 above conformance tests.\n43\nAppendix 4B.54\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI If any of these samples fail, a sample from every roll of composite drainage net onsite and a\n2 sample from every roll that is subsequently delivered from the same manufacturer must be\n3 conformance tested by the Geosynthetics CQA Laboratory, until the manufacturer has thoroughly\n4 demonstrated compliance with the above requirements to the sole satisfaction of the CQA\n5 certifying engineer. The cost of such tests is to be borne by the construction general contractor.\n6 The CQA representative will document actions taken in conjunction with conformance test failures and\n7 report all actions to the CQA certifying engineer. Failed tests will be documented using NCR procedures,\n8 outlined in Section 8.1.4.\n9 6.1.6 Deployment\n10 The construction general contractor will be required to handle all composite drainage net in such a\n11 manner as to ensure that it is not damaged.\n12 The construction general contractor (responsible for composite drainage net installation) will be required\n13 to certify in writing that the surface on which the composite drainage net will be installed is complete and\n14 acceptable. A certificate of partial completion will be given by the construction general contractor to the\n15 CQA representative, who will then verify to the CQA certifying engineer that the deployment surface is\n16 complete, prior to commencement of composite drainage net installation.\n17 After the surface on which the composite drainage net is to be installed has been accepted by the\n18 construction general contractor, the CQA representative will have responsibility to indicate to the CQA\n19 certifying engineer any change in the underlying layer that may, in accordance with the technical\n20 specifications, require repair work. If the CQA certifying engineer requires that repair work be done, it\n21 will be the responsibility of the construction general contractor to repair the underlying layer.\n22 The CQA representative will verify and document compliance with the following:\n23 * Just prior to composite drainage net placement, the layer that will underlie the composite drainage\n24 net is clean and free of excessive amounts of dust, dirt, stones, rocks, or other obstructions that\n25 could potentially damage the underlying layers or clog the drainage system.\n26 * In the presence of excessive wind, the composite drainage net is weighted with sandbags (or\n27 equivalent weight approved by the CQA certifying engineer).\n28 * Composite drainage net is kept under tension to minimize the presence of wrinkles in the\n29 composite drainage net. If necessary, the composite drainage net is positioned by hand after\n30 being unrolled, to minimize wrinkles.\n31 * Composite drainage net is cut using a composite drainage net cutter, approved by the composite\n32 drainage net manufacturer and the CQA representative. If in place, special care is taken to protect\n33 other materials from damage that could be caused by the cutting of the composite drainage net.\n34 * The construction general contractor takes all necessary precautions to prevent damage to the\n35 underlying layers during placement of the composite drainage net.\n36 0 Composite drainage net is not welded to geomembranes.\n37 * During placement of clean composite drainage net, care is taken not to entrap stones, excessive\n38 dust, or moisture that could damage the underlying geomembrane, generate clogging of drains or\n39 filters, or hamper subsequent seaming.\n40 * A visual examination of the composite drainage net is carried out over the entire surface, after\n41 installation, to ensure that no potentially harmful foreign objects, such as needles, are present.\n42 * Composite drainage net is not left exposed for an excess of 14 days after placement, to prevent\n43 damage from exposure to ultraviolet radiation (sunlight).\n44 The CQA representative will document any noncompliance with the above requirements and report it to\n45 the CQA certifying engineer.\nAppendix 4B.55\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 6.1.7 Seams and Overlaps\n2 The components of the composite drainage net (e.g., geotextile-geonet-geotextile) are not bonded together\n3 at the ends and edges of the rolls. The CQA representative will document that the composite drainage net\n4 is overlapped and secured in accordance with the technical specifications.\n5 6.1.8 Repair\n6 The CQA representative will verify that any holes or tears in the composite drainage net are repaired, in\n7 accordance with the technical specifications. The CQA representative will observe any repair, document\n8 any noncompliance with the above requirements, and report the noncompliance to the CQA certifying\n9 engineer. Repair areas will be documented using NCR procedures, outlined in Section 8.1.4.\n10\nAppendix 4B.56\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI SECTION 7 POLYETHYLENE PIPE AND FITTINGS CONSTRUCTION QUALITY\n2 ASSURANCE\n3 7.1 Pipe and Fittings\n4 The CQA representative will monitor the placement of the LCRS, LDS, and SLDS pipe, located on the\n5 IDF landfill floor and on the landfill slopes.\n6 7.1.1 Labeling\n7 The CQA representative will verify that the pipe is labeled with the information specified in the technical\n8 specifications. Any deviations from the labeling requirements will be reported to the CQA certifying\n9 engineer prior to pipe installation.\n10 7.1.2 Transportation and Handling\n11 The CQA representative will verify and document that the pipe and fittings are handled in accordance\n12 with the technical specifications. The CQA representative will visually inspect the pipe upon delivery at\n13 the site, and any deviations from the requirements of the technical specifications will be reported to the\n14 CQA certifying engineer.\n15 7.1.3 Storage\n16 The CQA representative will verify and document that storage of the pipe and fittings is in accordance\n17 with the technical specifications.\n18 7.1.4 Inventory\n19 The CQA representative will inventory the polyethylene piping and fitting, delivered to the site that will\n20 be installed at the bottom and on the slopes of the landfill. The CQA representative will perform the\n21 following tasks:\n22 * Verify the material for conformance with the technical specifications and construction drawings.\n23 * Verify slot dimensions for conformance with the technical specifications.\n24 * Check the material for damage, mishandling, and adverse exposure.\n25 Items that are restricted from further use until the inspections have been completed will be clearly\n26 delineated by the CQA representative. Accepted materials will be kept separate from inventoried and\n27 approved items, to the extent possible. The CQA representative will be responsible for coordinating with\n28 the construction general contractor during material delivery, to limit the material being moved more than\n29 necessary after it is unloaded and thereby minimizing damage due to handling.\n30 The CQA representative will perform the inventory immediately after the material arrives onsite to avoid\n31 delaying construction. The CQA representative will be responsible for verifying that only accepted\n32 material is installed at the IDF landfill, and that all inventories and inspections are documented and\n33 maintained.\n34 7.1.5 Conformance Testing\n35 No conformance testing will be conducted on the materials delivered to the site.\n36 7.1.6 Handling and Laying\n37 The CQA representative will verify and document that the pipe is installed at the specified locations,\n38 grades, and angles, and that placement of backfill around and over the pipe is conducted in accordance\n39 with the requirements of the technical specifications and in a manner intended to prevent damage to the\n40 pipe.\n41 The pipe and fittings will be carefully examined before installation by the CQA representative. The CQA\n42 representative will verify and document that cracks, damage, or defects are not present in the pipe and\n43 fittings in excess of that allowed by the technical specifications.\nAppendix 4B.57\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The CQA representative will also note the condition of the interior of pipes and fittings. Foreign material\n2 will be removed from the pipe interior before it is moved into final position. No pipe will be permitted to\n3 be placed until the CQA representative has observed the condition of the pipe. The CQA representative\n4 will document any deviation from the requirements and report it to the CQA certifying engineer.\n5 7.1.7 Joints and Connections\n6 Lengths of pipe will be required to be assembled into suitable installation lengths by the butt-fusion\n7 process. Butt-fusion refers to the butt joining of the pipe by softening the aligned faces of the pipe ends\n8 in a suitable apparatus and pressing them together under controlled pressure. The CQA representatives\n9 will spot-monitor butt-fusion welding operations to ensure that the construction general contractor\n10 follows the technical specifications for both slotted and solid pipes. The CQA representative will verify\n11 that internal weld beads have been removed from the horizontal and side slope sections of the LCRS,\n12 LDS, and SLDS riser pipes. The CQA representative will document any noncompliance with the\n13 requirements and report it to the CQA certifying engineer.\n14 7.1.8 Surveying\n15 A survey will be performed by or under the direction of a professional land surveyor registered in the\n16 State of Washington. The surveyor will independently survey the final elevation and alignment of the top\n17 of the pipe and fittings. Surveys will be performed on all pipe locations within the footprint of the landfill\n18 to confirm that the alignment and elevations in the field agree with those shown in the construction\n19 drawings. The results of the survey will be compiled in a report signed by the surveyor and the CQA\n20 certifying engineer.\n21 The surveyor will be required to survey each pipe location within the IDF landfill, in accordance with the\n22 requirements of this CQA Plan. A record drawing will be submitted to the CQA certifying engineer by\n23 the surveyor before placement of the next liner system layer. The surveys will be conducted every 50 feet\n24 along the pipe alignment and appurtenances. The survey will include enough information to confirm that\n25 the following features of the landfill piping are constructed in accordance with the construction drawings:\n26 * Beginning and end top of pipe elevations\n27 * Connection location\n28 * Grade breaks\n29 * Riser pipes\n30 0 Sump extensions\n31 The piping that will be surveyed will include, but not be limited to, the following:\n32 * SLDS piping\n33 * LDS piping\n34 * LCRS piping\n35 The CQA certifying engineer will approve the survey results for each layer before the subsequent\n36 component of the lining system is constructed.\n37\nAppendix 4B.58\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 8 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENTATION AND\n2 CERTIFICATION\n3 8.1 Documentation and Certification\n4 A major function of CQA is to properly and adequately document and certify the work. This section\n5 describes the minimum required documentation. The CQA certifying engineer may recommend to the\n6 IDF CM additional documentation for performing CQA tasks that are for certification. In addition, the\n7 CQA certifying engineer will prepare forms, field data sheets, sample labeling schemes, and chain-of-\n8 custody procedures and submit them to the IDF CM and IDF PM for approval, prior to construction.\n9 8.1.1 Daily Reports\n10 Daily reports will be completed by the CQA representatives when they are onsite. All CQA personnel\n11 will be assigned field books by the CQA certifying engineer that will be labeled with a unique number.\n12 The CQA representatives, including the CQA certifying engineer, will record all field observations and\n13 the results of field tests in their assigned field book. When not in use, all field books will be left in the\n14 field records file. After each book is filled (or at the end of the project), the field book will be returned to\n15 the CQA certifying engineer and routed to the project files.\n16 Each page of the field book will be numbered, dated, and initialed by CQA personnel. At the start of a\n17 new work shift, CQA personnel will list the following information at the top of the page:\n18 * Job name\n19 * Job number\n20 * Date\n21 * Name\n22 * Weather conditions\n23 * Page number (if pages are not pre-numbered)\n24 The remaining individual entries will be prefaced by an indication of the time at which they occurred. If\n25 the results of test data are being recorded on separate sheets, it will be noted in the field book. Entries in\n26 the field book will include, but not be limited to, the following information:\n27 * Reports on any meetings held and their results.\n28 * Equipment and personnel being used in each location, including construction general contractors.\n29 * Descriptions of areas being observed and documented.\n30 * Descriptions of materials delivered to the site, including any quality verification (vendor\n31 certification) documentation.\n32 * Descriptions of materials incorporated into construction.\n33 * Calibrations, or recalibrations, of test equipment, including actions taken as a result of\n34 recalibration.\n35 * Decisions made regarding use of material and/or corrective actions to be taken in instances of\n36 substandard quality.\n37 * Unique identifying sheet numbers of inspection data sheets and/or problem reporting and\n38 corrective measures reports used to substantiate the decisions described in the preceding item\n39 At the end of each day, the field CQA monitor will summarize the day's activities on a daily field\n40 monitoring report form. The field report will include a brief summary of the day's activities and highlight\n41 any unresolved issues that must be addressed by the CQA certifying engineer or by CQA representatives\n42 the following day.\n43 The daily field monitoring report will be filled out in triplicate. The CQA monitor will attach three copies\n44 of the field book notes for that day. The three copies will be distributed as follows:\nAppendix 4B.59\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * Original will be filed in field office.\n2 * One copy will be transmitted to the CQA certifying engineer.\n3 * One copy will be transmitted to the IDF CM.\n4 The CQA certifying engineer will review and initial each summary field report before distributing to the\n5 project quality records and the IDF CM.\n6 8.1.2 Inspection Data Sheets\n7 All observed field and laboratory test data will be recorded on an inspection data sheet. At a minimum,\n8 each inspection data sheet will include the following information:\n9 * Unique identifying sheet number for cross-referencing and document control.\n10 * Description of the inspection activity.\n11 * If appropriate, location of inspection activity or location from which the sample was obtained.\n12 * Type of inspection activity and/or procedure used (reference to standard method when\n13 appropriate).\n14 * Any recorded observation or test data, with all necessary calculations.\n15 * Results of the inspection activity and comparison with specification requirements.\n16 * Identification of any personnel involved in the inspection activity.\n17 * Signature of the individual(s) performing the CQA representative activity and concurrence by the\n18 CQA certifying engineer.\n19 * Identification of deficiencies and any required reinspections.\n20 Forms used for the data sheets will be prepared and submitted to the IDF CM and IDF PM in accordance\n21 with this section. The data sheets will include, but are not limited to, the forms listed below:\n22 * Sample log\n23 * Compaction test result log\n24 * Soil test result summary form\n25 * Equipment calibration log\n26 8.1.3 Record Drawing Maintenance\n27 The construction general contractor will maintain a complete set of construction drawings labeled\n28 \"Red-Line\" as-built drawings. At the completion of the project, the as-built drawings pertaining to the\n29 work certified under this CQA Plan will be produced in electronic format and submitted to the CQA\n30 certifying engineer. The CQA certifying engineer will review the completed set of as-built drawings and\n31 certify the drawing set as the record drawings for the IDF.\n32 8.1.4 Non-Conformance Reporting\n33 Deficiencies/defects identified by in-process testing may be reworked in accordance with the technical\n34 specifications or CQA Plan to correct the deficiency without initiating the NCR process (i.e., failed\n35 compaction test or failed geomembrane destructive test), and in-process tests will be tracked by the CQA\n36 representative until it is corrected. A non-conformance is considered to be a deficiency in characteristics,\n37 documentation, or procedures that renders the quality of an item or activity unacceptable or indeterminate.\n38 All deficiencies, defects, damage, or test failures that are not corrected by in-process rework will be\n39 considered a non-conformance and will be documented on a Non-Conformance Report (NCR) form. The\n40 non-conformance will be referred to the IDF CM, for disposition and initiation of corrective action\n41 processes.\n42 All NCR situations will be brought to the attention of the IDF CM for concurrence, prior to initiating the\n43 NCR.\nAppendix 4B.60\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Upon issuance of the non-conformance report, the IDF CM will notify the IDF design engineer, IDF\n2 quality engineer, and IDF PM that the report has issued. Other individuals, as directed by the IDF PM,\n3 will participate in NCR disposition, resolution, and corrective action processes as needed. All\n4 documentation relating to NCR situations will be retained in the project quality records.\n5 8.1.5 Resolution of Contract Document Questions and Clarifications\n6 Request for Information (RFI) forms will be provided to the CQA certifying engineer for the purpose of\n7 submitting written requests to the IDF CM, for assistance in understanding the design intent of the\n8 contract documents. The CM will determine whether the IDF design engineer's technical support staff\n9 will address the RF.\n10 RFIs initiated by the construction general contractor will be addressed by the IDF project engineer and\n11 CM, not by the CQA certifying engineer, and are not in the scope of the CQA Plan.\n12 Any RFIs that result in contract document changes will be incorporated by the IDF CM and PM,\n13 following the procedures outlined in Section 8.1.6.\n14 8.1.6 Construction Change Order and Contract Document Changes\n15 Requests for changes to the technical specifications or construction drawings will be referred to the IDF\n16 CM and initiated as a change order. All change orders and resulting design changes will be approved by\n17 the appropriate project team member prior to implementation, as outlined in procedure HNF-IP-0842,\n18 Volume 4., Section 4.29 (Engineering Document Change Control Requirements). Requests for\n19 modifications to the CQA Plan will also be made by completing a change order to the IDF CM and\n20 procurement agent, with copies to the IDF quality engineer and IDF project engineer.\n21 If, during the course of construction, questions arise regarding interpretation of the plans and/or\n22 specifications, the IDF CM will be contacted by the CQA certifying engineer. Any clarification of the\n23 construction drawings will be documented by a change order, if necessary, or by telephone conversation\n24 records or meeting minutes, and routed to the IDF design engineer, IDF CM, and IDF PM. The change\n25 order will also be routed to the project files.\n26 8.1.7 Progress Reports\n27 The CQA certifying engineer will prepare a summary progress report each week, or at time intervals\n28 established at the pre-construction meeting. At a minimum, this report will include the following\n29 information:\n30 * A unique identifying sheet number for cross-referencing and document control.\n31 * The date, project name, location, and other information.\n32 * A summary of work activities accomplished during the progress reporting period.\n33 * Identification of areas or items inspected and/or tested during the reporting period that are\n34 addressed by the report.\n35 * A summary of the quality characteristics being evaluated, with appropriate cross-references to\n36 technical specifications and/or construction drawings.\n37 * References to the technical specifications or construction drawings defining the acceptance\n38 criteria for each inspected characteristic.\n39 * A summary of inspection and test results, failures, and re-tests.\n40 * A summary of construction situations, deficiencies, and/or defects occurring during the progress\n41 reporting period.\n42 * A summary of other problem resolutions and dispositions.\n43 * The signature of the CQA certifying engineer.\nAppendix 4B.61\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The progress report will be submitted to the IDF PM no more than two days after the last reporting day in\n2 the progress report. Copies will also be submitted to the IDF PM, IDF quality engineer, and construction\n3 general contractor.\n4 8.1.8 Final Documentation and Certification\n5 All daily inspection summary reports, inspection sheets, problem identification and corrective measures\n6 reports, acceptance reports, change orders, NCRs, photographic records, progress reports, construction\n7 drawings, construction drawing revisions, and other pertinent documentation will be retained as\n8 permanent project quality records. At the completion of the project, a final CQA report that incorporates\n9 all such information, along with as-built drawings, will be prepared by the CQA certifying engineer and\n10 submitted to the IDF PM. The CQA certifying engineer will prepare an interim report for construction\n11 and testing of the test pads. A final CQA report and certification letter will be completed at the end of the\n12 construction that will fulfill the CQA certification requirements specified in WAC 173-303-335(4).\n13 The CQA certifying engineer will coordinate the completion of the as-built record drawings that will be\n14 generated by a land surveyor licensed in the State of Washington. The as-built records will include scale\n15 drawings depicting depths, plan dimensions, elevations, fill thicknesses, and geosynthetic panel layouts.\n16 The report will include documentation of each construction component monitored by CQA personnel and\n17 will be signed, stamped, and certified by the CQA certifying engineer.\n18 8.1.9 Storage of Records\n19 During the construction of the IDF, the CQA certifying engineer will be responsible for all CQA\n20 documents. This includes the CQA certifying engineer's copy of the design criteria, plans, procedures,\n21 and specifications; the CQA Plan; and the originals of all the data sheets and reports. The field records\n22 will be kept in lockable, metal cabinets or on metal shelving within a facility, protected by a fire alarm\n23 and/or a communication system that provides fire department response and/or fire suppression systems;\n24 or, in an Underwriters Laboratory-listed, one-hour fire-rated cabinet. At the completion of the project, all\n25 completed documents will be routed to the project quality records.\n26 8.1.10 Storage of Archive Construction Material Samples\n27 The CQA certifying engineer will be responsible for storing construction material samples collected\n28 during the duration of the project.\n29 The CQA certifying engineer will coordinate with the IDF PM and IDF CM on which samples will be\n30 archived at the completion of the project. All samples will be kept in small containers (i.e., 5-gallon\n31 plastic buckets). Each container will be labeled with the following information:\n32 * Project name\n33 * Date\n34 0 Sample I.D.\n35 0 Material type\n36 * Point of contact\n37 Control and protection of samples will be accomplished through the use of an index listing of samples.\n38 This index will identify each sample gathered and include the same information required for the sample\n39 containers. It will also identify where the sample is stored and person responsible for the sample storage,\n40 thus providing a documented record of each sample and methodology for verifying that all samples are\n41 available in storage and that no samples have been misplaced.\n42 All samples will be stored neatly in a cool, dry location, approved by the CQA certifying engineer. The\n43 CQA certifying engineer will coordinate with the IDF PM and IDF CM to determine which sample will\n44 be archived at the project completion.\n45\nAppendix 4B.62\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI SECTION 9 REFERENCES\n2 40 CFR 264.19. Code of Federal Regulations, Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste\n3 Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities, Section 19, \"Construction Quality Assurance Program\".\n4 Office of the Federal Register. July 9, 1999.\n5 ASTM. 1997 Annual Book ofASTM Standards, Volume 4.08: Soil and Rock (I). American Society for\n6 Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 1997.\n7 CH2M HILL. Drawings for the Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF) Detailed Design. RPP-19941, Rev. 0.\n8 Prepared for CH2M HILL Hanford Group. February 2004.\n9 CH2M HILL. Specifications for the Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF) Detailed Design.\n10 RPP-18489, Rev. 0. Prepared for CH2M HILL Hanford Group. February 2004.\n11 Geosynthetic Research Institute (GRI). \"Standard Test Method for Asperity Measurement of Textured\n12 Geomembranes Using a Depth Gage,\" Test Method GM12. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2000.\n13 U.S. Department of Energy. \"Radioactive Waste Management,\" DOE 0 435.1. August 28, 2001.\n14 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development. Technical Guidance\n15 Document: Quality Assurance and Quality Control for Waste Containment Facilities, EPA/600/R-\n16 93-182. Cincinnati, Ohio. 1993.\n17 Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-303-335, Construction Quality Assurance Program.\n18\nAppendix 4B.63\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAppendix 4B.64\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nAPPENDIX 4C\nFACILITY RESPONSE ACTION PLAN\nAppendix 4C.i\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\n6\nAppendix 4C.ii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2 APPENDIX 4C\n3 FACILITY RESPONSE ACTION PLAN\n4\n5 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n6 4C. FACILITY RESPONSE ACTION PLAN.......................5............5\n7 4C. 1. Leakage Response Action Plan....................5.......... ............... 5\n8 4C.1.1. Action Leakage Rate.......................................................5\n9 4C.1.2. Response Actions.........................................................5\n10 4C.2. References .............................................................. 7\n11\n12\n13\nAppendix 4C.iii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAppendix 4C.iv\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 4C. FACILITY RESPONSE ACTION PLAN\n2 4C.1. Leakage Response Action Plan\n3 WAC 173-303-665(9) regulations require the owner of the operator of a landfill unit to have an approved\n4 Response Action Plan (RAP) before receipt of waste. The RAP is a site-specific plan that establishes\n5 actions to be taken if leakage through the upper (primary) lining system of a landfill exceeds a certain\n6 rate. The intent of the RAP is to assure that any leachate that leaks through the primary lining system will\n7 not migrate out of the landfill into the environment.\n8 A key element of the RAP is the Action Leakage Rate (ALR), a threshold value which triggers the\n9 responses described in the RAP, but below which no special actions are required. Because landfill liner\n10 systems have not yet been perfected, a small amount of leakage through the primary liner generally\n11 occurs, despite the use of best available materials, construction techniques, and quality assurance\n12 procedures. (This leakage is collected by the LDS system and removed from the landfill.) Hence, the\n13 ALR is set at some level higher than normally expected leakage rates to serve as an indicator that the\n14 primary lining system is not functioning as expected. Exceeding the ALR may reflect serious failure of\n15 the primary lining system and indicates the need for investigation and possibly corrective action while the\n16 problem is still manageable.\n17 This RAP has been prepared in accordance with requirements of WAC 173-303-665(9). The\n18 requirements for determining the ALR are contained in WAC 173-303-665(8) and the Environmental\n19 Protection Agency (EPA) guidance document, Action Leakage Rates for Leak Detection Systems (EPA\n20 530-R-92-004).\n21 The following sections establish the ALR and discuss response actions to be taken if the ALR is\n22 exceeded.\n23 4C.1.1. Action Leakage Rate\n24 Section 5.11 provides a detailed discussion of the analysis to determine the ALR into the LDS for the\n25 Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF). Based on this analyses, the ALR for the IDF permitted cell is\n26 206 gallons per acre per day, or approximately 1,800 gallons per day per cell (each cell area is\n27 approximately 8.5 acres). This value includes a factor of safety of 2 in accordance with EPA guidelines\n28 (57 FR 19). It is also much lower than the LDS pump capacity. Details of the calculation are presented\n29 in Appendix C.10.\n30 In accordance with WAC 173-303-665(8)(b), the flow rate used to determine if the ALR has been\n31 exceeded will be calculated as the average daily flow rate into the sump, expressed as gallons per acre per\n32 day (unless Ecology approves a different calculation). This calculation will be performed on a weekly\n33 basis during the active (operational) life of the landfill, and monthly after the landfill has been closed.\n34 Post-closure frequency may be reduced if only minimal amounts of leachate accumulate in the leak\n35 detection system sump. As outlined in WAC 173-303-665(4)(c)(ii), during post-closure monitoring, if\n36 the liquid level in the LDS sump stays below the pump operating level for two consecutive months,\n37 monitoring of the amount of liquid in the LDS sumps can be reduced to at least quarterly. If the liquid\n38 level in the LDS sump stays below the pump operating level for two consecutive quarters, monitoring of\n39 the amount of liquid in the LDS sumps can be reduced to at least semiannually. Pump operating level is\n40 defined as a liquid level approved by Ecology, based on pump activation level, sump dimensions, and\n41 level that minimizes head in the sump.\n42 4C.1.2. Response Actions\n43 WAC 173-303-665(9) lists several required actions if the ALR is exceeded. In the event that the ALR is\n44 exceeded, the United States Department of Energy (DOE) will:\n45 * Notify Ecology in writing of the exceedance within 7 days of the determination.\nAppendix 4C.5\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * Submit a preliminary written assessment to Ecology within 14 days of the determination, as to the\n2 amount of liquids, likely sources of liquids, possible location, size, cause of any leaks, and short-\n3 term actions taken and planned.\n4 * Determine, to the extent practicable, the location, size, and cause of any leak.\n5 * Determine whether waste receipt should cease or be curtailed, whether any waste should be\n6 removed from the unit for inspection, repairs, or controls, and whether or not the unit should be\n7 closed.\n8 * Determine any other short-term and longer-term actions to be taken to mitigate or stop any leaks.\n9 * Within 30 days after the notification that the action leakage rate has been exceeded, submit to\n10 Ecology the results of the analyses specified in bullets 3, 4, and 5 of this section, the results of\n11 actions taken, and actions planned. Monthly thereafter, as long as the flow rate in the leak\n12 detection system exceeds the action leakage rate, the owner or operator must submit to the\n13 regional administrator a report summarizing the results of any remedial actions taken and actions\n14 planned.\n15 If the ALR is exceeded, DOE will submit the required notifications to Ecology, as stated above. The EPA\n16 will also receive copies of this confirmation.\n17 The leachate will be analyzed for Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) constituents. If the\n18 analytical results indicate that these constituents are present, and if the constituents can be traced to a\n19 particular type of waste stored in a known area of the landfill, then it may be possible to estimate the\n20 location of the leak. However, because the waste will meet land disposal restrictions, it will contain no\n21 free liquids and will be stabilized or solidified, except as allowed by Appendix 3A, section 1.2. In\n22 addition, the canister(s) or other type of waste package(s) may not undergo enough deterioration during\n23 the active life of the landfill to permit escape of its contents. For these reasons, it is possible that the\n24 leachate may be clean or the composition too general to indicate a specific source location.\n25 If the source location cannot be identified, large-scale removal of the waste and operations layer to find\n26 and repair the leaking area of the liner would be one option for remediation. However, this procedure\n27 risks damaging the liner. In addition, waste would have to be handled, stored, and replaced in the landfill.\n28 Backfill would need to be removed from around the waste packages to accomplish this. If the waste\n29 packages are damaged during this process, the risk of accidental release may be high. For these reasons,\n30 large scale removal of waste and liner system materials is not considered a desirable option and will not\n31 be implemented except as a last resort.\n32 The preferred options for remediation include covers and changes in landfill operating procedures. The\n33 preferred alternative will depend on factors such as the amount of waste already in the landfill, the rate of\n34 waste receipt, the chemistry of the leachate, the availability of other RCRA-compliant disposal facilities,\n35 and similar considerations. Hence, at this time no single approach can be selected. If the ALR is\n36 exceeded, potential options will be evaluated prior to selecting a remediation process. If necessary, an\n37 interim solution will be implemented while the evaluation and permanent remediation is performed.\n38 Examples of potential approaches include the following:\n39 * The surface of the intermediate soil cover over the waste could be graded to direct runoff into a\n40 shallow pond. The surface would then be covered with a discardable, temporary geomembrane\n41 (e.g., 30-mil PVC or reinforced polypropylene). Precipitation water would be pumped or\n42 evaporated from the pond and would not infiltrate the waste already in the landfill. Waste\n43 packages would be placed only during periods of dry weather and stored temporarily at other\n44 times. This type of approach would also be used, if necessary, to reduce leakage during the time\n45 immediately after the ALR was exceeded, while other remediation options were being evaluated.\n46 * If the landfill was nearly full, partial construction of the final closure cover might be an option.\n47 This would reduce infiltration into the landfill and possibly the leakage rate, if the cover was\n48 constructed over the failed area.\nAppendix 4C.6\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI * A layer of low-permeability soil could be placed over the existing waste, perhaps in conjunction\n2 with a geomembrane, to create a second \"primary\" liner higher in the landfill. This new liner\n3 would intercept precipitation and allow its removal.\n4 * A rigid-frame or air-supported structure could be constructed over the landfill to ensure that no\n5 infiltration occurred. Although costly, this approach might be less expensive than constructing a\n6 new landfill.\n7 In general, the selected remediation efforts would be those that are easiest to implement, with more\n8 difficult or expensive options to be applied only if earlier approaches were not satisfactory.\n9 4C.2. References\n10 EPA 530-R-92-004, Action Leakage Rates for Leak Detection Systems, U.S. Environmental Protection\n11 Agency, Office of Solid Waste Management, Washington, D.C., January 29, 1992.\n12 57 FR 19, Liners and Leak Detection Systems for Hazardous Waste Land Disposal Units,\n13 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, January 1992.\n14\nAppendix 4C.7\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAppendix 4C.8\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n2 APPENDIX 4D\n3 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS (C-1)\n4 RPP-18489, REV. 1\n5\n6\n7\nAppendix 4D.i\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\n6\nAppendix 4D.ii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n2 APPENDIX 4D\n3 CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS (C-1)\n4 RPP-18489, REV. 1\n5\n6 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n7 DIVISION 1-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS ........................................ 7\n8 DIVISION 2-SITE CONSTRUCTION............................................. 8\n9 SECTION 02200 -SITE PREPARATION SCHED. A & B .. ............................... 9\n10 SECTION 02315 -FILL AND BACKFILL SCHED. A & B ............................. 12\n11 SECTION 02316 -EXCAVATION SCHED. A & B............................. 18\n12 SECTION 02317 -BORROW AREA EXCAVATION SCHED. B ........... l.......21\n13 SECTION 02319 -SUBGRADE PREPARATION SCHED. B ........................... 23\n14 SECTION 02320 -TRENCH BACKFILL SCHED. A & B .................................. 25\n15 SECTION 02371 -GEOTEXTILES SCHED. B ............................ ......... 30\n16 Table 1. Required Geotextile Properties ........................................... 33\n17 SECTION 02373 -COMPOSITE DRAINAGE NET (CDN) SCHED. B............. ...................... 34\n18 Table 1. Required Geonet Properties ................................... .......... 39\n19 Table 2. Required CDN Properties ................................................. 39\n20 SECTION 02500 -RAW WATER CONVEYANCE PIPING -GENERAL SCHED. A & B.......40\n21 Table 1. Carbon Steel Pipe and Fittings............................................46\n22 Table 2. Galvanized Steel Pipe and Malleable Iron Fittings.........................47\n23 SECTION 02502 -RAW WATER DUCTILE IRON PIPE AND FITTINGS SCHED. A..........48\n24 SECTION 02509 -RAW WATER POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) PRESSURE PIPE\n25 AND FITTINGS SCHED. A & B ...................................... ......... 54\n26 Table 1. Solvent Weld Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Pipe and Fittings ......................... 58\n27 SECTION 02631 -CATCH BASINS SCHED. B .................................... 59\n28 SECTION 02632 -STORMWATER PIPING SCHED. B ............................... 61\n29 SECTION 02661 -GEOMEMBRANES SCHED. B ................................. 63\n30 Table 1. Required Geomembrane Properties 60-Mil Textured HDPE.......................79\n31 Table 2. Required Seam Properties Hdpe Geomembranes ......................... 80\n32 Geomembrane Installer's Certification of Subsurface Acceptability ......................... 81\n33 SECTION 02666-ADMIX LINER SCHED. B .......................................... 82\n34 SECTION 02667 -GEOSYNTHETIC CLAY LINER (GCL) SCHED. B........... ...................... 91\n35 SECTION 02920 -RECLAMATION AND REVEGETATION SCHED. A & B....... ............... 96\n36 DIVISION 3-CONCRETE ................................................... 101\n37 SECTION 03301 -CONCRETE SCHED. A & B ........................ ............. 102\n38 DIVISION 4-MASONRY (NOT USED) ..................................... ..... 113\n39 DIVISION 5-METALS ..................................................... 114\nAppendix 4D.iii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI SECTION 05500 -METAL FABRICATIONS AND CASTINGS SCHED. A & B............................. 115\n2 DIVISION 6-WOODS AND PLASTIC (NOT USED) ............................. ........ 127\n3 DIVISION 7-THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION .............................. 128\n4 SECTION 07210 -BUILDING INSULATION SCHED. B ................... ............. 129\n5 DIVISION 8-DOORS AND WINDOWS (NOT USED) .......................... .......... 131\n6 DIVISION 9-FINISHES .......................................................... 132\n7 SECTION 09900 -PAINT COATING SYSTEMS SCHED. A & B.. .................................. 133\n8 DIVISION 10-SPECIALTIES (NOT USED) ................................ ............ 141\n9 DIVISION 11-EQUIPMENT ...................................................... 142\n10 SECTION 11305 -COMBINED AND BUILDING SUMP PUMPS SCHED. B................................... 143\n11 Sump Pump Data Sheet, 11305-01 ............................................ ....... 146\n12 Sump Pump Data Sheet, 11305-02 .......................................... ......... 147\n13 SECTION 11306 -LEACHATE PUMPS SCHED. B............................... 148\n14 Leachate Pump Data Sheet, 11306-01 ............................................ ..... 152\n15 Leachate Pump Data Sheet, 11306-02 .......................................... ...... 154\n16 Leachate Pump Data Sheet, 11306-03 .................................................... 156\n17 Leachate Pump Data Sheet, 11306-04 ...................................................... 158\n18 SECTION 11312 -HORIZONTAL END SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS SCHED. B................ 160\n19 Horizontal End Suction Centrifugal Pump Data Sheet, 11312-01 ....................... 164\n20 DIVISION 12-FURNISHINGS (NOT USED) ................................. .......... 166\n21 DIVISION 13-SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION ........................................... 167\n22 SECTION 13122 -METAL BUILDING SYSTEMS SCHED. B ...................... ...... 168\n23 SECTION 13205 -LINED BOLTED STEEL LIQUID STORAGE TANKS SCHED. B ...... ..... 176\n24 SECTION 13401 -PROCESS INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL SYSTEMS (PICS)\n25 SCHED. B........................................................................... 187\n26 Instrument Listing for Cell No. I & Cell No. 2...................................... 213\n27 Component Specifications ......................................................... 220\n28 Loop Descriptions ............................................................... 248\n29 DIVISION 14 (NOT USED) ....................................................... 267\n30 DIVISION 15 (NOT USED) ....................................................... 268\n31 SECTION 15021 -HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) PIPE SCHED. B .................. 269\n32 Attachment 1, High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe............................ 275\n33 SECTION 15022 -HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE MANHOLES SCHED. B............................ 276\n34 SECTION 15060 -PIPING-GENERAL SCHED. B .............................. 278\n35 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Pipe & Fittings........................................284\n36 Galvanized Steel Pipe & Malleable Iron Fittings ................................. ....... 285\n37 Piping Schedule Legend .......................................................... 286\n38 Piping Schedule ................................................................ 287\n39 SECTION 15100 -VALVES, OPERATORS, AND FILTER SCHED. A & B....... .................. 288\n40 SECTION 15140 -PIPING SUPPORT SYSTEMS SCHED. B .......... ................... 295\nAppendix 4D.iv\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 15500 -HEATING, VENTILATING, AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS\n2 SCHED. B........................................................................... 300\n3 Equipment Identification Numbers ........................................ .......... 304\n4 SECTION 15992 -PIPING LEAKAGE TESTING SCHED. B............................. 305\n5 DIVISION 16 -ELECTRICAL ..................................................... 308\n6 SECTION 16005 -ELECTRICAL .................................................. 309\n7 Luminaire Schedule ............................................................. 333\n8 SECTION 16055 -PIPE HEAT TRACING SCHED. B ........................... .......334\n9 SECTION 16080 -ELECTRICAL TESTING SCHED. A &B.........................339\n10 SECTION 16270 -OIL-FILLED PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMERS SCHED. A .......................... 348\n11 SECTION 16270-1 -SINGLE PHASE OIL-FILLED PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMERS\n12 SCHED. B........................................................................... 353\n13 SECTION 16312 -OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SCHED. A........ .......... 358\n14 SECTION 16440 -LOW VOLTAGE MOTOR CONTROL SCHED. B ...................... 367\n15\n16\nAppendix 4D.v\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAppendix 4D.vi\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nDIVISION 1-GENERAL REQUIREMENTS\nAppendix 4D.7\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nDIVISION 2-SITE CONSTRUCTION\nAppendix 4D.8\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI SECTION 02200 -SITE PREPARATION SCHED. A & B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 Work Included\n4 This section describes requirements for clearing, grubbing and stripping of the IDF project area and\n5 associated facilities.\n6 Definitions\n7 Interfering or Objectionable Material: Trash, rubbish, and junk.\n8 Clearing: Removal of existing vegetation and interfering or objectionable material lying on or\n9 protruding above ground surface.\n10 Grubbing: Removal of vegetation and other organic matter including sagebrush, stumps, buried logs,\n11 and roots greater than 2 inches caliper to a depth of 6 inches below subgrade.\n12 Stripping: Removal of topsoil and other organic matter. Strippings suitable for topsoil shall be limited\n13 to upper 6 inches.\n14 Project Limits: Areas actually needed for site improvements, stockpiles, and borrow areas, as shown or\n15 specified, within which work is to be performed.\n16 Raw Water SuppyI\n17 Depending on the availability of connections to the raw water pipeline system, water for dust control may\n18 be obtained either from an existing water fill station on 4th Street near the west exit of the 200 East Area\n19 or from the raw water line that crosses the IDF site. A new raw water pipeline is being installed as part of\n20 Schedule A of the IDF project.\n21 Whether water is obtained from the existing water fill station or from new facilities on the IDF site, use of\n22 connections to the raw water system shall be in accordance with guidance from the Hanford Site Water\n23 Purveyor. Use and discharge of raw water during construction for construction activities, including dust\n24 control and fire protection, shall be controlled through the Hanford Site Water Purveyor, and shall comply\n25 with WAC 173-200 and the State Waste Discharge Permit No. ST 4508. For any use of existing water fill\n26 station or a water connection on the IDF site, the total of all IDF project water usage from the raw water\n27 system shall not exceed 1,500 gpm. There is no guarantee that the 1,500 gpm will be available at all\n28 times or that will be available from a single location on the IDF water system. In addition, the maximum\n29 water use limitation may be periodically reduced by the Hanford Site Water Purveyor depending on the\n30 other Hanford Site demands on the raw water system and/or the availability of raw water pumping\n31 capacity within the Hanford raw water system. When using any connection to the raw water system, the\n32 Construction General Contractor shall take whatever means are necessary to operate fill stations and other\n33 connections in such a manner to prevent causing water hammer. If water usage from the system is found\n34 to cause water hammer, the Hanford Site Water Purveyor may require the use of orifice plates, changes to\n35 valve operation methods, and/or a reduction in water use at a water connection as necessary to eliminate\n36 the water hammer. For any onsite fill station, Construction General Contractor shall provide a water\n37 storage tank (minimum size 20,000 gallons) equipped with a float actuated fill valve to minimize demand\n38 surges on the Hanford Water Supply.\n39 Submittals-Approval Required\n40 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n41 Site Preparation Plan: Prior to any mobilization of equipment to the site, the Construction General\n42 Contractor shall submit a Site Preparation Plan for approval. This plan shall include the following\n43 information as a minimum:\nAppendix 4D.9\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Detailed description of the proposed method for clearing, grubbing, and stripping the site. The plan\n2 shall identify those areas of the project site, which will be cleared, grubbed, and stripped. In addition,\n3 it will identify staging areas, stockpile areas, and the sequence in which the site preparation will be\n4 executed.\n5 Dust Control Plan:\n6 Prior to any earthwork activities on the project site such as site preparation and excavation,\n7 Construction General Contractor shall submit a Dust Control Plan for approval. The plan shall\n8 identify methods and equipment to minimize/control dust generation during all earthwork operations\n9 and include the following minimum requirements:\n10 Continuous control of dust generation during excavation and backfill placement, etc.\n11 Continuous control of wind-generated dust, including disturbed areas that are not being actively\n12 worked.\n13 Keep haul roads watered to control dust.\n14 A minimum two full water trucks (5,000 gallons each) for the duration of the project.\n15 Apply water or other approved dust suppressants as minimum to keep visible dust to a minimum\n16 during execution of work.\n17 Appropriate hand-held hose lines, sprinklers, and other equipment as needed to access and control\n18 non-vehicle access areas such as borrow and stockpile side slopes.\n19 Maintain and protect native cover where possible, through minimization of site disturbance.\n20 Limit access road development to minimum necessary to execute work.\n21 Stabilization of inactive disturbed work areas by longer-term methods such as matting, tack and\n22 mulch or crusting agents.\n23 Implementation of permanent stabilization on a regular basis when sufficient area exists for\n24 application or as needed to control dust.\n25 General Construction Contractor shall use daily field reports to document dust control measures.\n26 implemented and their effectiveness.\n27 These dust control plan items are required to satisfy the requirements of Section 3.0 -Mitigation of\n28 Potential Dust Impacts from Construction Activities of the \"Mitigation Action Plan for USDOE,\n29 Hanford Site, Immobilized Low-Activity Waste (ILAW) Disposal Site Construction\n30 (Project W-520),\" prepared by PNNL for USDOE.\n31 Submit details of raw water supply, storage, and water withdrawal limiting equipment as part of the\n32 Dust Control Plan.\n33 Scheduling and Sequencing\n34 The sequence of the activities listed below shall be followed by the Construction General Contractor\n35 for the site preparation work.\n36 Initial site preparation activities shall commence only after Dust Control Plan and Site Preparation\n37 Plan have been approved.\n38 Following the approved Site Preparation Plan, establish an adequate water supply source for dust\n39 control use.\n40 After establishing an adequate water supply and sediment controls, proceed with site preparation\n41 activities as specified.\nAppendix 4D.10\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Part 2 -Products (Not Used)\n2 Part 3 -Execution\n3 General\n4 Clear, grub, and strip only areas actually needed for stockpiles, borrow, or site improvements within\n5 limits shown and specified.\n6 Extent of Site Preparation required for individual designated stockpile areas shall be as directed by\n7 the Construction Manager.\n8 Do not injure or deface vegetation that does not require removal.\n9 As an initial step in clearing the site, the General Construction Contractor shall remove all trash,\n10 rubbish, and junk from the site. This material shall be disposed in accordance with Division 1\n11 requirements.\n12 Clearing\n13 Cut off shrubs, brush, weeds, and grasses to within 4 inches of ground surface.\n14 Grubbing\n15 Grub all areas where excavations, fill, roadways, structures, and ditches are to be placed.\n16 Vegetation other than noxious weeds, removed by the clearing and grubbing, shall be placed in\n17 stockpile with the strippings to be used as topsoil. Place vegetation at the base of the strippings\n18 stockpile area and track with equipment to break apart and crush the material. Obtain Construction\n19 Manager approval of the vegetation placement.\n20 Stripping\n21 Strip all areas where excavations, borrow areas, stockpiles, fills, roadways, structures, and ditches are\n22 to be placed, to remove organic materials. Do not remove subsoil with topsoil.\n23 Stockpile strippings from the upper 6 inches below ground surface after clearing and grubbing,\n24 meeting requirements for topsoil in Section 02920, RECLAMATION AND REVEGETATION,\n25 separately from other excavated material at either the designated stockpile area location shown on the\n26 Drawings, or other areas as approved by the Construction Manager.\n27 IDF Raw Water Connections\n28 General Construction Contractor shall take necessary steps to prevent freezing and/or damage to the\n29 IDF raw water system connections.\n30 Disposal\n31 Clearing and Grubbing Debris: Bury vegetation that is not suitable for topsoil at a designated area as\n32 directed by the Construction Manager. Disposal of the remaining interfering or objectionable material\n33 shall be in accordance with Division 1 requirements.\n34 Strippings: Dispose of strippings that are unsuitable for topsoil as specified above for clearing and\n35 grubbing debris.\n36 Burning Prohibited: No burning of any materials generated during the site preparation work will be\n37 allowed at the site.\n38 END OF SECTION 02200\nAppendix 4D. 11\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 02315 -FILL AND BACKFILL SCHED. A & B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 Work Included\n4 This section describes placement and testing of fill and backfill in general areas of the site (including\n5 stockpiles).\n6 References\n7 The following is a list of standards, which may be referenced in this section:\n8 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n9 ASTM D75 Standard Practice for Sampling Aggregates\n10 ASTM D422 Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils\n11 ASTM D698 Test Method for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using\n12 Standard Effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft (600 kN-m/m'))\n13 ASTM D 1140 Standard Test Method for Amount of Material in Soils Finer than the\n14 No. 200 (75 micrometer) Sieve\n15 ASTM D1556 Standard Test Method for Density and Unit Weight of Soil in Place by the\n16 Sand-Cone Method\n17 ASTM D2216 Standard Test Method for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture)\n18 Content of Soil and Rock by Mass.\n19 ASTM D2922 Standard Test Methods for Density of Soil and Soil-Aggregate in Place by\n20 Nuclear Methods (Shallow Depth)\n21 ASTM D3017 Standard Test Method for Water Content of Soil and Rock in Place by\n22 Nuclear Methods (Shallow Depth)\n23 Definitions\n24 Relative Compaction: Ratio, in percent, of as-compacted field dry density to laboratory maximum dry\n25 density as determined in accordance with ASTM D698.\n26 Apply corrections for oversize material to maximum dry density.\n27 Optimum Moisture Content: Determined in accordance with ASTM D698 specified to determine\n28 maximum dry density for relative compaction.\n29 Prepared Ground Surface: Ground surface after completion of required demolition, clearing and\n30 grubbing, scalping of sod, stripping of topsoil, excavation to grade, and subgrade preparation.\n31 Completed Course: A course or layer that is ready for next layer or next phase of Work.\n32 Lift: Loose (uncompacted) layer of material.\n33 Geosynthetics: Geotextiles, geocomposites, geosynthetic clay liner, or geomembranes.\n34 Well-Graded:\n35 A mixture of particle sizes with no specific concentration or lack thereof of one or more sizes.\n36 Does not define numerical value that must be placed on coefficient of uniformity, coefficient of\n37 curvature, or other specific grain size distribution parameters.\n38 Used to define material type that, when compacted, produces a strong and relatively incompressible\n39 soil mass free from detrimental voids.\nAppendix 4D.12\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Influence Area: Area within planes sloped downward and outward at 60-degree angle from horizontal\n2 measured from:\n3 1-foot outside outermost edge at base of foundations or slabs.\n4 1-foot outside outermost edge at surface of roadways or shoulder.\n5 0.5-foot outside exterior at spring line of pipes or culverts.\n6 Imported Material: Materials obtained from sources offsite, suitable for specified use.\n7 Standard Specifications: When referenced in this section, shall mean Standard Specifications for Road,\n8 Bridge, and Municipal Construction, as published by the Washington State Department of Transportation,\n9 2002 edition, English units.\n10 SLDS: Secondary Leak Detection System.\n11 Permanent Stockpile: Stockpile of material that remains at the completion of construction.\n12 Submittals-Approval Required\n13 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n14 Submit gradation test results for all imported materials from independent testing laboratory as specified in\n15 paragraph SOURCE QUALITY CONTROL in Part 2.\n16 Stockpile Plan: Prior to any excavation activities associated with construction of the IDF, Construction\n17 General Contractor shall submit a Stockpile Plan for approval. The plan shall include the following\n18 information:\n19 Scale drawing, using the project plans as a base, which shows the proposed location for stockpiles on\n20 the project site. Show all access roads around stockpiles. Address stockpile locations during\n21 construction of the IDF and permanent stockpiles, which will remain upon completion of construction\n22 activities for this project.\n23 Stockpile layout drawings, which show the estimated location of toe of slope and top of slope for\n24 each stockpile. Drawings shall show plan and typical sections and shall be fully dimensioned.\n25 Plan shall show how differing materials encountered during the excavation will be segregated for\n26 future use. This includes material for use as topsoil, admix base soil, and operations layer. Also,\n27 show a stockpile area for material to be used in the future as clean backfill during landfill operations\n28 by the Tank Farm Contractor.\n29 Method by which stockpile compaction will be achieved.\n30 Dust control for the stockpiles during active use and until grass is established.\n31 Placing of topsoil, seeding, fertilizing, and mulching each stockpile after active use of stockpile is\n32 finished in accordance with Section 02920, RECLAMATION AND REVEGETATION.\n33 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n34 Information/Record (IR):\n35 Qualifications of independent testing laboratory.\n36 Qualifications of construction quality control personnel.\n37 Construction quality control test reports\n38 Sequencing And Scheduling\n39 Complete applicable Work specified in Sections 02316, EXCAVATION, and 02319, SUBGRADE\n40 PREPARATION, prior to placing fill or backfill\nAppendix 4D.13\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Permit Requirements\n2 A backfill and fill permit is required for each backfill and fill work element. Construction General\n3 Contractor shall obtain from Tank Farm Contractor and post before starting backfill and fill work, as\n4 specified in Division 1, General Requirements.\n5 Construction Quality Assurance (CQA)\n6 The Construction General Contractor shall accommodate all CQA activities described herein and in\n7 the CPA Plan for this project. The CQA Plan is made part of these Specifications by reference.\n8 The CQA Certifying Engineer shall determine in-place density and moisture content by any one or\n9 combination of the following methods: ASTM D2922, ASTM D3017, ASTM D1556, ASTM D2216,\n10 or other methods approved by the Construction Manager.\n11 Testing requirements and locations will be determined by the CQA Certifying Engineer.\n12 Construction General Contractor shall cooperate with the CQA Certifying Engineer and testing work\n13 by leveling small test areas designated by the CQA Certifying Engineer. Backfill test areas at\n14 Construction General Contractor's sole expense. The CQA Certifying Engineer may have any\n15 material tested at any time, location, or elevation.\n16 After Construction General Contractor makes repairs to any areas failing a test, the Construction\n17 General Contractor shall rerun appropriate tests, subject to the approval of the CQA Certifying\n18 Engineer, to demonstrate the area meets specifications, at the Construction General Contractor's sole\n19 expense.\n20 The following minimum test schedule shall be assumed. Additional tests may be required as directed\n21 by CQA Certifying Engineer.\n22 In-place density tests shall be made on the following minimum schedule:\n23 Earth fill: One per 5,000 square feet (ft2) per lift.\n24 Structural Fill: One per 2,500 ft2 per lift.\n25 Subgrade Preparation: Four per acre.\n26 Operations Layer (Outside Edge of Liner): One per 5,000 ft2 per lift.\n27 Operations Layer Material (SLDS): Two (2) per lift.\n28 Standard Proctor (ASTM D698) laboratory density curves (five-point minimum) shall be performed\n29 for each material by the CQA Certifying Engineer. Samples of native materials used for embankment\n30 and backfill and samples of imported materials shall be taken at locations as specified by CQA\n31 Certifying Engineer.\n32 Gradation tests (sieve analysis) shall be performed in accordance with ASTM D422 on operations\n33 layer material obtained from required excavations to demonstrate the materials meet the\n34 Specifications. Samples of operations layer material shall be taken from each 10,000 cubic yards of\n35 placed material in accordance with ASTM D75.\n36 Part 2 -Products\n37 Earthfill\n38 Excavated material from required excavations and designated borrow sites, free from rocks larger\n39 than 4 inches in the greatest dimension, from roots and other organic matter, ashes, cinders, trash,\n40 debris, and other deleterious materials.\n41 Structural Fill\n42 Structural fill adjacent to concrete structures shall be as specified in Section 02320, TRENCH\n43 BACKFILL, for Pipe Bedding.\nAppendix 4D.14\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Structural fill beneath concrete structures and beneath leachate storage tank shall conform to the\n2 requirements of Section 9-03 9(3) Crushed Surfacing-Top Course in the Standard Specifications.\n3 Operations Layer\n4 Meeting the requirements of earthfill above and having a maximum of 25 percent by weight passing\n5 the No. 200 U.S. sieve and a maximum particle size of 2 inches.\n6 Drain Gravel\n7 Material for drain gravel shall conform to the requirements of Section 9-03.12(4) of the Standard\n8 Specifications except material shall be subrounded to rounded gravel. Crushed rock and angular\n9 gravel shall not be allowed.\n10 Crushed Surfacing\n11 Material for crushed surfacing-base course and top course shall conform to the requirements in\n12 Section 9-03 9(3) of the Standard Specifications.\n13 Quarry Spalls\n14 Quarry spalls shall consist of broken stone free from segregation, seams, cracks, and other defects tending\n15 to destroy its resistance to weather and shall meet the following requirements for grading:\n16 Maximum Size: 8 inches\n17 50 percent by weight shall be larger than 3 inches\n18 Minimum Size: 3/4 inch\n19 Source Quality Control\n20 Gradation tests performed in accordance with ASTM D422 by a qualified independent testing\n21 laboratory shall be made for imported materials on samples taken at place of production prior to\n22 shipment. Imported materials shall not be shipped without submittal approval. Samples of the\n23 finished product for gradation testing shall be taken from each 2,000 tons of prepared materials in\n24 accordance with ASTM D75. Test results shall be submitted to Construction Manager within 48\n25 hours after sampling. Size distribution for imported quarry spalls material shall be determined in\n26 accordance with one of the methods described in ASTM D5519.\n27 Base Soil: As specified in Section 02666, ADMIX LINER.\n28 Water For Moisture Conditioning: See Section 02200, SITE PREPARATION, for raw water supply\n29 availability and requirements for proper compaction.\n30 Part 3 -Execution\n31 General\n32 Keep placement surfaces free of water, debris, and foreign material during placement and compaction\n33 of fill and backfill materials.\n34 Place and spread fill and backfill materials in horizontal lifts of uniform thickness as specified in\n35 paragraphs BACKFILL UNDER AND AROUND STRUCTURES and FILL, in a manner that avoids\n36 segregation, and compact each lift to specified densities prior to placing succeeding lifts. Slope lifts\n37 only where necessary to conform to final grades or as necessary to keep placement surfaces drained\n38 of water.\n39 Do not place fill or backfill, if fill or backfill material is frozen, or if surface upon which fill or\n40 backfill is to be placed is frozen.\n41 Tolerances:\nAppendix 4D.15\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Final Lines and Grades: Within a tolerance of 0.1-foot unless dimensions or grades are shown or\n2 specified otherwise.\n3 Grade to establish and maintain slopes and drainage as shown. Reverse slopes are not permitted.\n4 Settlement: Correct and repair any subsequent damage to structures, pavements, curbs, slabs, piping, and\n5 other facilities, caused by settlement of fill or backfill material.\n6 Backfill Under and Around Structures\n7 Under Facilities: Backfill with earthfill or structural fill, as shown on the Drawings, for each structure or\n8 facility. Place earthfill or structural fill in lifts of 6-inch maximum compacted thickness and compact\n9 each lift to minimum of 95 percent relative compaction as determined in accordance with ASTM D698.\n10 Fill\n11 Outside Influence Areas Beneath Structures, Slabs, Piping, and Other Facilities: Unless otherwise\n12 shown, place earthfill as follows:\n13 Allow for 6-inch thickness of topsoil where required.\n14 Maximum 8-inch thick lifts.\n15 Place and compact fill across full width of embankment.\n16 Compact to minimum 95 percent relative compaction.\n17 Replacinq Overexcavated Material\n18 Replace excavation carried below grade lines shown as follows:\n19 Beneath IDF Cell: Earthfill as specified herein.\n20 Beneath Fill or Backfill: Same material as specified for overlying fill or backfill.\n21 Beneath Structures and Roadways: Structural fill or earthfill as shown on the Drawings and specified\n22 herein.\n23 Topsoil\n24 Place topsoil on areas disturbed by construction and on permanent stockpile slopes in accordance\n25 with Section 02920, RECLAMATION AND REVEGETATION.\n26 Stockpiling\n27 Material shall be placed in permanent stockpiles as follows:\n28 Place material in maximum 3-foot lifts and compact with a minimum four passes with earth-moving\n29 equipment. Uniformly route hauls truck traffic across the surface of each lift to aid in lift compaction.\n30 Maximum slopes shall be 3H: 1V. Minimum slopes shall be 3 percent to promote drainage.\n31 Upper 2 feet of stockpile surface shall be placed in maximum 12-inch thick lifts and compacted to\n32 minimum 90 percent relative compaction as determined in accordance with ASTM D698.\n33 Place 6-inch thick layer of topsoil on completed slopes in accordance with Section 02920,\n34 RECLAMATION AND REVEGETATION.\n35 Permanent stockpiles shall be seeded, fertilized, and mulched when each stockpile is completed and\n36 as directed by the Engineer in accordance with Section 02920, RECLAMATION AND\n37 REVEGETATION.\n38 Placing Crushed Surfacing\n39 Place crushed surfacing base course and top course at locations shown on the Drawings. Placement\n40 shall conform to Section 4-04.3 of the Standard Specifications.\nAppendix 4D.16\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Thickness of the drain gravel on the cell floor shall be a minimum of 1.0 foot (increase drain gravel\n2 thickness in vicinity of LCRS collection and riser pipes as shown on drawings) and tolerances for the\n3 top of the drain gravel shall be grade to plus 0.2 foot.\n4 Placing Drain Gravel And Operations Layer Over Geosynthetics\n5 Place material over geosynthetics as specified in Sections 02371, GEOTEXTILES; 02661,\n6 GEOMEMBRANES; and 02667, GEOSYNTHETIC CLAY LINER (GCL).\n7 Compaction requirements for drain gravel on the cell floor, around pipes, and the sumps are specified\n8 in Section 02320, TRENCH BACKFILL.\n9 Operations layer within lining system limits, except as specified for SLDS sump area, shall be placed\n10 in 12-inch thick lifts and track-walked into place with a minimum two passes with a Caterpillar D6M-\n11 LGP or equal. Operations layer material within SLDS sump area shall be placed in 12-inch thick lifts\n12 and compacted to 90 percent relative compaction. Operations layer placed outside edge of liner, such\n13 as for shine berm, shall be placed in maximum 8-inch thick lifts and compacted to 95 percent relative\n14 compaction.\n15 Place material to the lines and grades shown and compact by tracking a minimum two passes with\n16 spreading equipment. Thickness of the operations layer shall be a minimum 3 feet and tolerances for\n17 top of operations layer shall be grade to plus 0.3 foot.\n18 Quarry Spalls Placement\n19 Quarry spalls shall be placed around the ends of stormwater pipes to provide erosion protection in\n20 accordance with the Plans and as directed by the Engineer. Quarry spalls shall be placed in such a\n21 manner that all relatively large stones are essentially in contact with each other and voids are filled\n22 with the finer materials to provide a well graded compact mass. Finished surface shall be free from\n23 irregularities. The stone shall be dumped on the ground in a manner that will ensure the stone attains\n24 its specified thickness in one operation. When dumping or placing, care shall be used to avoid\n25 damaging the underlying material. Stone shall not be dumped from height greater than 12 inches\n26 above surface. Material placement shall be started from the bottom of the installation, working\n27 toward edges. Geotextile damaged during the placement of quarry spalls shall be repaired at\n28 Construction General Contractor's sole expense.\n29 Construction Quality Control\n30 The Construction General Contractor shall perform in-place density and moisture content tests with own\n31 qualified personnel or with a qualified independent testing laboratory as specified in paragraph\n32 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE, to be observed by the Construction Manager, on the\n33 following minimum schedule:\n34 Material Placed by Stockpile (Upper 2 Feet): One per 10,000 ft2 perlift.\n35 Construction General Contractor shall submit qualifications of personnel or independent testing\n36 laboratory that will perform construction quality control.\n37 END OF SECTION 02315\nAppendix 4D.17\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 02316 -EXCAVATION SCHED. A & B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 Work Included\n4 This section describes all excavation necessary for completion of the Project, including excavation for\n5 structures, pipe trenches, and leachate sumps.\n6 References\n7 The following is a list of standards, which may be referenced in this section:\n8 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)\n9 29 CFR 1926 OSHA Safety and Health Regulations for Construction; Subpart P -Excavations\n10 Excavation Support And Safety\n11 Install and maintain adequate excavation safety and shoring systems that meet the requirements of\n12 OSHA 29 CFR 1926 Subpart P) and Washington Industrial Safety and Health Act, Chapter 49.17\n13 RCW and WAC 296-155, \"Safety Standards for Construction Work\" Part IV-Excavation, Trenching\n14 and Shoring, and all other applicable local, state, and federal regulations.\n15 Design, provide, and maintain shoring, sheeting, and bracing as necessary to support the sides of\n16 excavations and to prevent detrimental settlement and lateral movement of existing facilities, adjacent\n17 property, and completed Work. Per OSHA requirements, 29 CFR 1926.652 requires that custom\n18 shoring installations shall be designed and stamped by a professional engineer licensed in the State of\n19 Washington.\n20 Weather Limitations\n21 Material excavated during inclement weather shall not be used as fill or backfill until after material\n22 drains and dries sufficiently for proper compaction.\n23 Permit Requirements:\n24 An excavation permit is required for each excavation work element. Construction General Contractor\n25 shall obtain from Tank Farm Contractor and post before starting excavation work, as specified in\n26 Division 1, General Requirements.\n27 Part 2 -Products (Not Used)\n28 Part 3 -Execution\n29 General\n30 Generally, excavate to lines, grades, and dimensions shown and as necessary to accomplish work.\n31 Excavate subgrade to within tolerance of minus 0.5 foot to plus 0.1 foot except where dimensions or\n32 grades are shown or specified as maximum or minimum.\n33 If unexpected, debris foreign material of any kind (e.g., contaminated soil) or cultured properties\n34 (e.g., bones and artifacts) is exposed or encountered during excavation, the Construction General\n35 Contractor shall stop work in the affected area and notify the Construction Manager. Obtain approval\n36 from Construction Manager before resuming excavation.\n37 Control dust from excavation activities as specified in approved Dust Control Plan. See\n38 Section 02200, SITE PREPARATION, for Dust Control Plan requirements.\n39 If soft or loose subgrade zones are encountered at the bottom of the excavation after proof rolling,\n40 correct as specified in Section 02319, SUBGRADE PREPARATION.\nAppendix 4D.18\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Structure Excavation\n2 Excavations for such structures as footings, foundations, slabs, and manholes shall be made to the\n3 depths shown on the Drawings and of sufficient width to allow adequate room for placement of\n4 structural fill setting and removing forms, installing accessories and inspection. Care shall be taken to\n5 prevent disturbing the bottom of the excavation. Excavation to final grade shall not be made until just\n6 before concrete forms are to be placed therein. Prepare bottom of structure excavation as specified in\n7 Section 02319, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, prior to placement of concrete foundations.\n8 Trench And Sump Excavation\n9 Trenches and sumps shall be of sufficient width to provide adequate room for workmen to perform\n10 any necessary service to the materials or items being installed therein and to permit proper\n11 compaction of the backfill.\n12 Minimum Width of Trenches: As shown on Drawings.\n13 Maximum Trench Width: Unlimited, unless otherwise shown or specified, or unless excess width will\n14 cause damage to existing facilities, adjacent property, or completed Work.\n15 If wet or otherwise unsatisfactory soil is encountered in a trench excavation, at or below the trench\n16 bottom, it shall be brought to the attention of the Construction Manager and removed as directed. The\n17 bottom of the excavation shall then be brought to the required grade with stabilization as specified in\n18 Section 02320, TRENCH BACKFILL.\n19 Temporary Stockpile Excavation\n20 Always keep stockpile neat and orderly and work there in a systematic manner. Take necessary\n21 precautions to maintain existing erosion control measures and prevent offsite sediment releases.\n22 When work is completed in the stockpile area, grade area to drain surface water runoff to appropriate\n23 collection and discharge points. Reclaim disturbed areas of stockpile as specified in Sections 02315,\n24 FILL AND BACKFILL, and 02920, RECLAMATION AND REVEGETATION.\n25 Stockpiling Excavated Material\n26 Stockpile excavated material that is suitable for use as embankment or backfill, as operations layer\n27 material, road gravel, or drain gravel, until material is needed. Place materials in stockpiles at the\n28 designated locations shown on the Drawings. Materials shall be placed in stockpiles as specified in\n29 Section 02315, FILL AND BACKFILL.\n30 Confine stockpiles to within areas shown on Drawings. Do not obstruct roads or streets. Stockpiles\n31 should maintain clearance from existing permanent monitoring wells and disposed cribs as shown on\n32 the Drawings.\n33 Do not stockpile excavated material adjacent to trenches and other excavations unless excavation\n34 sideslopes and excavation support systems are designed, constructed, and maintained for stockpile\n35 loads. The registered professional engineer responsible for the shoring design shall approve stockpile\n36 locations.\n37 Do not stockpile excavated materials near or over existing facilities, adjacent property, or completed\n38 work, if weight of stockpiled material could induce excessive settlement. The registered professional\n39 engineer responsible for the shoring design shall approve stockpile locations.\n40 Disposal of Spoil\n41 Dispose of excavated materials, which are unsuitable or not needed for fill or backfill, in designated\n42 stockpile areas shown on the Drawings, or spoil disposal areas as directed by Construction Manager.\n43 Materials shall be placed as specified in Section 02315, FILL AND BACKFILL.\n44 Trench Excavation For Geosynthetic Anchor Trenches\n45 Geosynthetic anchor trench excavation shall be as specified in Section 02661, GEOMEMBRANES.\nAppendix 4D.19\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Construction Quality Control\n2 Construction General Contractor provides adequate survey control to avoid unauthorized over\n3 excavation.\n4 END OF SECTION 02316\nAppendix 4D.20\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 02317 -BORROW AREA EXCAVATION SCHED. B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 Work Included\n4 This section describes requirements for borrow excavation from the Admix Base Soil Borrow Area as a\n5 source of base soil for the admix. The Admix Base Soil Borrow Area is located within the IDF site\n6 boundary approximately 1,000 feet south of the Phase I area as shown on the Drawings.\n7 Submittals-Approval Required\n8 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n9 Borrow Area Development Plan: Detailing development, operation, dust and erosion, mitigation\n10 measures, and reclamation of each borrow area.\n11 Part 2 -Products (Not Used)\n12 Part 3 -Execution\n13 General\n14 Clear, grub, and strip only areas actually needed for borrow within limits shown or specified.\n15 Do not injure or deface vegetation that does not require removal.\n16 Clearing, Grubbing, Stripping, And Disposal:\n17 Clearing, grubbing, and stripping shall meet the requirements of Section 02200, SITE\n18 PREPARATION.\n19 Disposal\n20 Clearing and Grubbing Debris: As specified in Section 02200, SITE PREPARATION.\n21 Strippings: As specified in Section 02200, SITE PREPARATION.\n22 Borrow Area Operation\n23 Borrow area shall be developed and operated in accordance with the mitigation measures identified in\n24 the approved Borrow Area Development Plan and these Specifications.\n25 Always keep borrow pits neat and orderly, and work them in systematic manner. Continuously keep\n26 borrow pits graded to drain to a low point, and take necessary precautions to control erosion and\n27 prevent offsite sediment releases. Dewater as necessary to develop, operate, and reclaim each borrow\n28 area. Control dust as specified in approved Dust Control Plan. See Section 02200, SITE\n29 PREPARATION, for Dust Control Plan requirements.\n30 Material meeting the requirements for base soil as specified in Section 02666, ADMIX LINER, shall\n31 be excavated from the Borrow Area. Base soil should not be obtained below a depth of 5 feet below\n32 existing ground surface (after stripping) without evaluation of the material suitability and\n33 authorization from the Construction Manager.\n34 Do not excavate more borrow material than required for work. Leave surplus material in place.\n35 Excavate material in an orderly manner to avoid inclusion of unacceptable material.\n36 Reclamation\n37 At the completion of borrow area excavation, grade borrow pits to drain to low point so that ponded\n38 surface water may be removed by pumping. Where practical, blend graded surfaces neatly with\n39 surrounding terrain at completion of borrow operations.\nAppendix 4D.21\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Final Slopes:\n2 Maximum: 4H: IV.\n3 Minimum: 2 percent.\n4 Do not use borrow pits for disposal, unless otherwise specified or shown.\n5 Place 6-inch thick layer of topsoil and seed, fertilize, and mulch all disturbed areas as specified in\n6 Section 02920, RECLAMATION AND REVEGETATION.\n7 END OF SECTION 02317\nAppendix 4D.22\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 02319 -SUBGRADE PREPARATION SCHED. B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 Work Included\n4 This section describes requirements for preparation of subgrades in areas to receive fill.\n5 References\n6 The following is a list of standards, which may be referenced in this section:\n7 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n8 ASTM D698 Test Method for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard\n9 Effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3))\n10 Definitions\n11 Optimum Moisture Content: As defined in Section 02315, FILL AND BACKFILL.\n12 Prepared Ground Surface: Ground surface after completion of clearing and grubbing, scalping of sod,\n13 stripping of topsoil, excavation to grade, and scarification and compaction of subgrade.\n14 Relative Compaction: As defined in Section 02315, FILL AND BACKFILL.\n15 SLDS: Secondary Leak Detection System.\n16 Subgrade: Layer of existing soil after completion of excavation to grade prior to placement of fill,\n17 roadway structure, or base for floor slab.\n18 Proof Rolling: Testing of subgrade as specified herein to identify soft or loose zones requiring\n19 correction.\n20 Sequencing And Scheduling\n21 Complete applicable Work specified in Section 02316, EXCAVATION, prior to subgrade\n22 preparation.\n23 Construction Quality Assurance\n24 The CQA Certifying Engineer shall determine in-place density and moisture for subgrade preparation\n25 as specified in Section 02315, FILL AND BACKFILL, except for prepared subgrade for admix on\n26 sideslopes.\n27 CQA requirements for geomembrane subgrade preparation are specified in Section 02661,\n28 GEOMEMBRANES.\n29 Part 2 -Products (Not Used)\n30 Part 3 -Execution\n31 General\n32 Keep subgrade free of water, debris, and foreign matter during compaction or proof rolling.\n33 Bring subgrade to proper grade and cross-section as shown on the Drawings, and uniformly compact\n34 surface.\n35 Maintain prepared ground surface in finished condition until next course is placed.\n36 Prepared Subqrade For Roadway, Embankment, And Structures\n37 After completion of excavation and prior to foundation, road fill, structural fill, or embankment\n38 construction, compact prepared subgrade to 95 percent relative compaction. Scarify and moisture\n39 condition subgrade soil as required to achieve specified compaction.\nAppendix 4D.23\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 If soft or loose zones are found, correct as specified herein. Proof-roll subgrade with a fully loaded\n2 dump truck or equal to detect soft or loose subgrade or unsuitable material.\n3 Landfill Bottom Floor Prepared Subqrade For Admix Liner\n4 Prior to admix liner placement, subgrade shall be back bladed to remove loose soil. Low spots or\n5 erosion rills shall be backfilled with structural fill as specified herein. Compact prepared subgrade to\n6 95 percent relative compaction. Scarify and moisture condition subgrade soil as required to achieve\n7 specified compaction. If soft or loose zones are found, correct as specified herein. Proof-roll\n8 subgrade with a vibratory drum roller or equal to detect soft or loose subgrade or unsuitable material.\n9 Landfill Sideslope (3h: 1v) Prepared Subqrade For Admix Liner\n10 Prior to admix placement, the subgrade shall be back bladed to remove all loose material produced by\n11 trimming operations. Low spots or erosion rills shall be backfilled with structural fill as specified\n12 herein. The trimmed surface shall be watered so that moisture penetrates a minimum of 3 inches into\n13 the subgrade. The trimmed and watered surface shall be track-walked by D6-LGP dozer or\n14 equivalent with a minimum 4 passes to produce a firm and stable subgrade. Visual monitoring (no in-\n15 place density testing is required) of the subgrade preparation on sideslopes will be performed by the\n16 CQA Certifying Engineer.\n17 Prepared Subqrade For Geomembrane (Secondary and SLDS) and Secondary GCL\n18 At completion of SLDS excavation and grading (SLDS geomembrane) or admix liner placement\n19 (secondary geomembrane and GCL), prepare the subgrade surface for geomembrane or GCL\n20 placement. The surface shall not have holes, depressions more than 1 inch in a 12-inch width, nor\n21 protrusions extending above the surface more than 1/2 inch. Roll surface with smooth-drum roller to\n22 form a firm stable base. Allow for leachate piping and sumps or features as shown on the Drawings.\n23 Correction\n24 Soft or Loose Subgrade: Adjust moisture content and compact to meet density requirements, or\n25 Over excavate and replace with suitable material from the excavation, as specified in Section 02315,\n26 FILL AND BACKFILL.\n27 Unsuitable Material: Over excavate and replace with suitable material from the excavation, as specified\n28 in Section 02315, FILL AND BACKFILL. Dispose of unsuitable material excavation in accordance with\n29 Article DISPOSAL OF SPOIL in Section 02316, EXCAVATION.\n30 END OF SECTION 02319\nAppendix 4D.24\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 02320 -TRENCH BACKFILL SCHED. A & B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 Work Included\n4 This section describes requirements for backfilling of trenches for pipe, conduit, and geosynthetics.\n5 References\n6 The following is a list of standards, which may be referenced in this section:\n7 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n8 ASTM C136 Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse Aggregates\n9 ASTM D698 Test Method for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil using Standard\n10 Effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft (600 kN-m/m3))\n11 ASTM D 1140 Standard Test Method for Amount of Material in Soils Finer than the No. 200\n12 (75 micrometer) Sieve\n13 ASTM D4318 Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of\n14 Soils\n15 Definitions\n16 Pipe Bedding: Granular material upon which pipes, conduits, cables, or duct banks are placed.\n17 Imported Material: Material obtained by the Construction General Contractor from source(s) offsite.\n18 Lift: Loose (uncompacted) layer of material.\n19 Pipe Zone: Backfill zone that includes full trench width and extends from prepared trench bottom to an\n20 upper limit above top outside surface of pipe, conduit, cable or duct bank.\n21 Prepared Trench Bottom: Graded trench bottom after stabilization and installation of bedding material.\n22 Relative Compaction: The ratio, in percent, of the as-compacted field dry density to the laboratory\n23 maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D698. Corrections for oversize material may be applied\n24 to either the as-compacted field dry density or the maximum dry density.\n25 Submittals-Approval Required\n26 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n27 Submit gradation test results for all imported materials as specified in paragraph SOURCE\n28 QUALITY CONTROL in Part 2.\n29 Submiftals-Approval Not Required\n30 Vendor Information (VI): Locator ribbon product data.\n31 Part 2 -Products\n32 Locator Ribbon\n33 Ribbon shall be 3 inches wide and shall be red for all electrical conduits, electrical cables, and\n34 telephone cables. Blue locator ribbon shall be used for all buried pipe in the raw water system.\n35 Yellow locator ribbon shall be used for the electrical duct bank from riser pole to the transformer.\n36 Purple locator ribbon shall be used for the buried leachate transfer lines.\n37 Ribbon shall be tape manufactured by Reef Industries or Allen Markline or equal and shall have\n38 metal foil, which is completely encased in plastic and can be easily detected by metal detectors.\nAppendix 4D.25\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The ribbon shall be printed with the manufacturer's standard wording, \"CAUTION ELECTRIC LINE\n2 BURIED BELOW\", for all electrical conduits, phone lines, etc., \"CAUTION BURIED PIPELINE\n3 BELOW\", for all buried pipelines.\n4 Trench Stabilization Material\n5 Granular material from the excavation or stockpile meeting the requirements of structural fill as specified\n6 in Section 02315, FILL AND BACKFILL.\n7 Pipe Bedding\n8 Pipe bedding material for thermoplastic pipe shall be clean sand/gravel mixture free from organic matter\n9 and conforming to the following gradation:\n10 Sieve Size Percent Passing\n11 3/4\" square 100\n12 3/8\" square 70-100\n13 U.S. No. 4 55-100\n14 U.S. No. 10 35-100\n15 U.S. No. 20 20-80\n16 U.S. No. 40 10-55\n17 U.S. No. 100 0-10\n18 U.S. No. 200 0-5\n19 All percentages are by weight.\n20 Pipe Zone Material\n21 Excavated granular material from required excavations, free from rocks, roots, and organic matter. The\n22 maximum particle size shall be 3/4 inch and the percent by weight passing the No. 200 U.S. sieve shall be\n23 a maximum 15 percent.\n24 Pipe bedding may be used as substitute for pipe zone material.\n25 Earth Backfill\n26 Earthfill as specified in Section 02315, FILL AND BACKFILL.\n27 Structural Fill\n28 As specified in Section 02315, FILL AND BACKFILL.\n29 Source Quality Control\n30 As specified in Section 02315, FILL AND BACKFILL.\n31 Part 3 -Execution\n32 Trench Preparation\n33 Water Control:\n34 Promptly remove and dispose of water entering trench as necessary to grade trench bottom and to\n35 compact backfill and install manholes, pipe, conduit, direct-buried cable, or duct bank. Do not place\n36 concrete, lay pipe, conduit, direct-buried cable, or duct bank in water.\n37 Remove water in a manner that minimizes soil erosion from trench sides and bottom.\n38 Provide continuous water control until trench backfill is complete.\nAppendix 4D.26\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Remove foreign material and backfill contaminated with foreign material that falls into trench.\n2 Trench Bottom\n3 Firm Subgrade: Remove loose and disturbed material and trim off high areas and ridges left by\n4 excavating equipment. Tamp to provide a firm and unyielding subgrade. Allow space for bedding\n5 material if shown or specified.\n6 Soft Subgrade: If subgrade is encountered that may require removal to prevent pipe settlement, notify\n7 Engineer. Engineer will determine depth of over excavation, if any, required.\n8 Trench Stabilization Material Installation\n9 Rebuild trench bottom with trench stabilization material.\n10 Place material over full width of trench in 8-inch maximum, loose measurement lifts to required\n11 grade, providing allowance for bedding thickness.\n12 Compact each lift to provide a firm, unyielding support for the bedding material prior to placing\n13 succeeding lifts.\n14 Beddinq\n15 Place over the full width of the prepared trench bottom in two equal lifts when the required depth\n16 exceeds 8 inches.\n17 Hand grade and compact each lift to provide a firm, unyielding surface.\n18 Minimum Compacted Thickness: As shown on the Drawings. For leachate collection and riser pipes,\n19 there shall be no bedding between lining system and pipe.\n20 Direct-Buried Cable: 3 inches.\n21 Duct Banks:\n22 2 inches.\n23 Check grade and correct irregularities in bedding material.\n24 Backfill Pipe Zone\n25 Upper limit of pipe zone shall not be less than following:\n26 Pipe: 12 inches, unless shown otherwise.\n27 Conduit: 3 inches, unless shown otherwise.\n28 Direct-Buried Cable: 3 inches, unless shown otherwise.\n29 Duct Bank:\n30 3 inches, unless shown otherwise.\n31 Restrain pipe, conduit, cables, and duct banks as necessary to prevent their movement during backfill\n32 operations.\n33 Place pipe zone material simultaneously in lifts on both sides of pipe and, if applicable, between\n34 pipes, conduit, cables, and duct banks installed in same trench.\n35 Pipes 10 Inches and Smaller Diameter: First lift less than or equal to 1/2 pipe-diameter.\n36 Pipes Over 10-Inch Diameter:\n37 Maximum 8-inch, loose measurement lifts.\n38 Thoroughly tamp each lift, including area under haunches, with handheld tamping bars supplemented\n39 by \"walking in\" and slicing material under haunches with a shovel to ensure that voids are completely\n40 filled before placing each succeeding lift.\nAppendix 4D.27\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 After the full depth of the pipe zone material has been placed as specified, compact the material by a\n2 minimum of three passes with a vibratory plate compactor only over the area between the sides of the\n3 pipe and the trench walls.\n4 Do not use power-driven impact compactors to compact pipe zone material.\n5 Locator Ribbon Installation\n6 Continuously install locator ribbon along centerline of all buried piping, at depth of 16 inches below\n7 ground surface unless shown otherwise on the Drawings. Coordinate with piping installation\n8 drawings.\n9 Backfill Above Pipe Zone\n10 General\n11 Do not allow backfill to free fall into the trench or allow heavy, sharp pieces of material to be placed\n12 as backfill until after at least 2 feet of backfill has been provided over the top of pipe. Trench backfill\n13 using water-settling methods for compaction is not permitted.\n14 Do not use power driven impact type compactors for compaction until at least 2 feet of backfill is\n15 placed over top of pipe. Hand-held jump jack type compactors are acceptable for compaction of\n16 backfill over top of pipe.\n17 Backfill to grade with proper allowances for topsoil, road gravel subbase, and pavement thicknesses,\n18 wherever applicable.\n19 Backfill around structures with same backfill as specified for adjacent trench unless otherwise shown\n20 or specified.\n21 Backfill outside the Limits of Roadways, Utilities, and Other Facilities:\n22 Place earthfill in lifts not exceeding 12-inch maximum, loose measurement thickness.\n23 Mechanically compact each lift to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction prior to placing\n24 succeeding lifts.\n25 Backfill Under Facilities, Roadways, and Utilities: Backfill trench above the pipe zone with structural\n26 fill in lifts not exceeding 8 inches maximum, loose measurement thickness. Compact each lift to a\n27 minimum of 95 percent relative compaction prior to placing succeeding lifts.\n28 Replacement of Topsoil\n29 Where applicable, replace topsoil in top 6 inches of backfilled trench.\n30 Maintain the finished grade of topsoil even with adjacent area and grade as necessary to restore\n31 drainage.\n32 Drain Gravel Backfill For Leachate Collection (Slotted) Pipe, Riser Pipes, And Sumps\n33 Use drain gravel as specified in Section 02315, FILL AND BACKFILL.\n34 Drain gravel shall be placed in sumps by mechanical or hand methods that will not damage pipes or\n35 underlying geosynthetics. For areas within 3 feet of leachate collection pipe, riser pipe, and\n36 transducer pipe centerline, the Construction General Contractor shall place first lift of drain gravel on\n37 both sides of pipe in a 9-inch lift, and succeeding lifts shall be 6 inches maximum. The Construction\n38 General Contractor shall thoroughly tamp each lift, including area under haunches with handheld\n39 equipment and tools to ensure that voids are completely filled before placing each succeeding lift.\n40 After first lift and after the full depth of material has been placed as specified, the Construction\n41 General Contractor shall compact the material by a minimum of three passes with a hand-held\n42 vibratory plate compactor only over the area within 3 feet of pipe centerline.\n43\nAppendix 4D.28\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 For LDS Drain Gravel placement within the LDS Sump, outside of 3 feet from the leachate collection\n2 pipe centerline, material will be placed in 6-inch maximum lifts and compacted in lifts with a\n3 minimum of three passes of the hand-held plate compactor to ensure that firm and unyielding\n4 conditions are achieved throughout the entire gravel thickness in the sump. At all other locations,\n5 drain gravel shall be track-walked into place with a minimum two passes with a D6M-LGP bulldozer\n6 or equal. Equipment limitations and requirements for placing materials over geosynthetics are\n7 specified in Section 02315, FILL AND BACKFILL.\n8 Backfill For Geosynthetic Anchor Trenches\n9 Backfill with material as shown on the Drawings in loose lifts not exceeding 6 inches in thickness and\n10 compact using hand-operated equipment or mechanical equipment as approved by the Design\n11 Engineer to not less than 90 percent relative compaction.\n12 Construction Quality Control\n13 The Construction General Contractor shall perform in-place density and moisture content tests as\n14 specified in Section 02315, FILL AND BACKFILL, to be observed by the Construction Manager, on\n15 the following minimum schedule:\n16 Backfill Above Pipe Zone: One per 500 linear feet per lift.\n17 Maintenance of Trench Backfill\n18 After each section of trench is backfilled, maintain the surface of the backfilled trench even with the\n19 adjacent ground surface until final surface restoration is completed.\n20 Topsoil: Add topsoil where applicable and as necessary to maintain the surface of the backfilled trench\n21 level with the adjacent ground surface.\n22 Other Areas: Add excavated material where applicable and keep the surface of the backfilled trench\n23 level with the adjacent ground surface.\n24 Settlement of Backfill:\n25 Settlement of trench backfill, or of fill or facilities constructed over trench backfill will be considered a\n26 result of defective compaction of trench backfill.\n27 END OF SECTION 02320\nAppendix 4D.29\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI SECTION 02371 -GEOTEXTILES SCHED. B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 References\n4 The publications listed below form a part of this Specification to the extent referenced. The publications\n5 are referred to in the text by basic designation only.\n6 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n7 ASTM D3776 Standard Test Method for Mass per Unit Area (Weight) of Fabric\n8 ASTM D4355 Deterioration of Geotextiles from Exposure to Ultraviolet Light and Water\n9 (Xenon-Arc Type Apparatus)\n10 ASTM D4491 Standard Test Methods for Water Permeability of Geotextiles by Permittivity\n11 ASTM D4533 Standard Test Method for Trapezoid Tearing Strength of Geotextiles.\n12 ASTM D4632 Standard Test Method for Grab Breaking Load and Elongation of Geotextiles\n13 ASTM D4751 Standard Test Method for Determining Apparent Opening Size\n14 ASTM D4833 Standard Test Method for Index Puncture Resistance of Geotextiles,\n15 Geomembranes, and Related Products\n16 ASTM D5261 Standard Test Method for Measuring Mass per Unit Area of Geotextiles\n17 Description\n18 The Work includes manufacture, fabrication (if needed), supply, and installation of geotextiles associated\n19 with the lining of the disposal facility and other applications as shown on the Drawings. This section also\n20 applies to geotextiles used in geocomposite drainage layers [see Section 02373, COMPOSITE\n21 DRAINAGE NET (GEOCOMPOSITE)].\n22 SubmiTtals-Approval Required\n23 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n24 Manufacturer's descriptive data, specification sheets, literature, and other data as necessary to fully\n25 demonstrate that those materials proposed for use comply with the requirements of these\n26 Specifications.\n27 Manufacturer's Quality Control (QC) test data for geotextile physical properties, verifying\n28 compliance with these Specifications. Data shall include test results, methods, and roll numbers.\n29 Frequency of manufacturer's QC testing shall be at the standard rate stated in the manufacturer's QC\n30 plan.\n31 Manufacturer's written certification that materials meet the requirements of these Specifications and\n32 that geotextile is continuously inspected for presence of needles and found to be needle-free.\n33 Construction Quality Assurance (CQA)\n34 Quality assurance procedures for geotextile are presented in the CQA Plan. CQA Plan requirements\n35 are discussed in Section 02661, GEOMEMBRANE. The Construction General Contractor shall\n36 accommodate all CQA activities described herein and in the CQA Plan for this project.\n37 Prior to placing any materials over the installed geotextile, the Construction General Contractor shall\n38 allow time for acceptance of the Work as listed in the CQA Plan.\n39\nAppendix 4D.30\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 CQA Conformance Testing\n2 Prior to deployment of the rolls of geotextile, the CQA Certifying Engineer will obtain samples at a\n3 frequency of one per production lot or 50,000 square feet of each material type, whichever results in the\n4 greater number of tests. The CQA Certifying Engineer will test the samples to determine conformance to\n5 both the design specifications and the list of certified properties.\n6 As a minimum, the following tests will be performed on geotextiles (each type, except as noted):\n7 Grab Strength: ASTM D4632.\n8 Tear Strength: ASTM D4533.\n9 Puncture Strength: ASTM D4833.\n10 Permittivity: ASTM D4491 (Type I only).\n11 The CQA Certifying Engineer shall be allowed to remove samples for testing and other activities.\n12 Sample dimensions, procedures, and frequency shall be the same as those specified in the CQA Plan.\n13 The Construction General Contractor shall assist the CQA Certifying Engineer as necessary in all\n14 sampling and testing activities.\n15 Procedures for samples that fail conformance testing are outlined in the CQA Plan. The cost of\n16 additional conformance testing to demonstrate compliance of failed samples shall be borne by the\n17 Construction General Contractor.\n18 Part 2 -Products\n19 General\n20 Types of Geotextiles:\n21 Type 1 (separation) geotextile shall be 6 oz/yd2 nominal weight and shall be used for separation of\n22 soil layers, in the geocomposite drainage layers, and at other locations as shown on the Drawings.\n23 Type 2 (cushion) geotextile shall be 12 oz/yd2 nominal weight and shall be used for cushioning of\n24 geomembranes and at other locations as shown on the Drawings.\n25 All geotextiles, regardless of type, shall be nonwoven, needle punched polypropylene.\n26 Manufacturer: The geotextile manufacturer shall be a commercial entity normally engaged in\n27 manufacture of geotextiles for landfill applications.\n28 Required Properties\n29 Property Values:\n30 Geotextile properties shall meet or exceed the values specified in Table 1, Required Geotextile\n31 Properties, contained in this section of the Specifications (Type I and Type 2 geotextiles).\n32 The manufacturer shall provide test results for all properties listed in Table 1 (Type 1 and Type 2\n33 geotextiles).\n34 The manufacturer shall certify that the materials supplied meet the requirements of this Part (Type 1\n35 and Type 2 geotextiles).\n36 Integrity: Geotextiles shall retain their structure during handling, placement, and long-term service.\n37 Transportation, Handling, and Storage\n38 Geotextiles shall be supplied in rolls wrapped in covers and marked or tagged with the roll number.\n39 Each material roll shall include information to demonstrate material traceability through written\n40 documentation from the manufacturer and transport company. At a minimum, this information shall\n41 include the Manufacturer's Name, Product Identification, Lot Number, and Roll Dimension (Area and\n42 Width).\nAppendix 4D.31\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Transportation of the geotextiles to the site and all handling on site shall be the responsibility of the\n2 Construction General Contractor.\n3 During shipment and storage, the geotextile shall be protected from mud, dirt, UV exposure, dust,\n4 puncture, cutting, or other damaging or deleterious conditions. Protective wrappings, which are\n5 damaged, shall be repaired or replaced, as necessary.\n6 The Construction General Contractor shall be responsible for the storage of the geotextiles on site\n7 within the areas shown on the Drawings. The Construction General Contractor shall protect storage\n8 area(s) from theft, vandalism, passage of vehicles, etc.\n9 Part 3 -Execution\n10 General\n11 Unacceptable Materials and Work: Materials and Work, which fail to meet the requirements of these\n12 Specifications, shall be removed and disposed of at the Construction General Contractor's expense. This\n13 includes geotextile rolls that are not labeled or where the label has deteriorated to the point of being\n14 illegible.\n15 Handling And Placement\n16 The Construction General Contractor shall handle all geotextiles in such a manner as to ensure that\n17 they are not damaged. Geotextile will be deployed on top of textured HDPE geomembrane in a\n18 manner that will not damage the geotextile. If necessary, use a smooth slip-sheet under the geotextile.\n19 Place geotextiles in a manner that prevents folds and wrinkles. Folds or wrinkles shall be pulled\n20 smooth prior to seaming.\n21 In the presence of wind, all exposed geotextiles shall be weighted with sandbags or equivalent.\n22 Sandbags shall be installed during placement and shall remain until replaced with cover material.\n23 Geotextiles shall be cut using an approved geotextile cutter only. Special care shall be taken to\n24 protect underlying geosynthetic materials from damage during cutting.\n25 During geotextile placement, care shall be taken not to entrap stones, excessive dust, or moisture that\n26 could damage the geomembrane, clog drains or filters, or hamper subsequent seaming.\n27 Geotextiles shall be placed with the machine direction (long dimension) downslope or normal to the\n28 natural slope.\n29 After installation and immediately prior to placing overlying materials, the geotextile shall be\n30 examined over its entire surface to ensure that no potentially harmful foreign objects, such as needles,\n31 are present. Any foreign objects encountered shall be removed, or the geotextile shall be replaced.\n32 If light colored geotextile is used, precautions shall be taken against \"snow blindness\" of personnel.\n33 After deployment, all geotextile shall be covered to prevent exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation\n34 (sunlight) within a maximum period of 14 days. If the geotextile is exposed for more than 14 days, a\n35 temporary cover may be deployed for the duration of the delay or samples may be submitted to an\n36 independent testing laboratory to ensure that detrimental levels of UV degradation have not occurred.\n37 Detrimental level of UV degradation is defined as greater than 10 percent loss of required geotextile\n38 properties listed in Table I for the following:\n39 Grab strength.\n40 Trapezoidal tear strength.\n41 Puncture strength.\n42 Joints\n43 Edge of roll seams are not required to be sewn and shall be overlapped a minimum of 6 inches. End\n44 of roll seams are not required to be sewn and shall be overlapped a minimum of 12 inches.\nAppendix 4D.32\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 No end-of-roll seams shall be allowed on slopes 6H:1 V and steeper. Overlaps shall be in the\n2 direction of flow with the upstream fabric on top of the downstream fabric.\n3 On the landfill floor, no horizontal seam shall be closer than 3 feet to the toe of the slope or other\n4 areas of potential stress concentrations.\n5 Areas to be seamed shall be clean and free of foreign material.\n6 Repai\n7 Any holes or tears in the geotextile shall be repaired as follows:\n8 Remove any soil or other material, which may have penetrated the torn geotextile.\n9 Replace torn areas and holes by placing a geotextile patch having dimensions of at least 12 inches\n10 greater than the tear or hole. The geotextile patch shall be sewn or heat bonded.\n11 For repairs of the geotextile component of the CDN, a patch shall be heat bonded.\n12 Materials In Contact With Geotextiles\n13 The Construction General Contractor shall place all soil materials located on top of a geotextile in such a\n14 manner as to ensure that the following conditions are satisfied:\n15 No damage to the geotextile.\n16 Minimal slippage of the geotextile on underlying layers.\n17 No excess tensile stresses in the geotextile.\n18 END OF SECTION 02371\n19 Table 1. Required Geotextile Properties\n20 Value(a)\nProperty Unit Type 1 Type 2 Test Method\nMass/Unit Area oz/yd2 6.0(b) 12.0(b) ASTM D5261 or D3776\nApparent Opening U.S. Sieve 70 max opening - ASTM D4751\nSize(b) 100 min opening\nGrab Strength lb 140 300 ASTM D4632\nTrapezoidal Tear\nStrength lb 70 110\nASTM D4533\nPuncture Strength lb 65 135 ASTM D4833\nPermittivity sec' 1.2 - ASTM D4491\nUV Resistance % (500 hours) retained 70 70 ASTM D4355\nstrength\n21 Notes:\n22 (a)All values are minimum average values, except as noted.(b) Nominal values.\nAppendix 4D.33\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 02373 -COMPOSITE DRAINAGE NET (CDN) SCHED. B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 References\n4 The publications listed below form a part of this Specification to the extent referenced. The publications\n5 are referred to in the text by basic designation only.\n6 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n7 ASTM D413 Standard Test Method for Rubber Property Adhesion to Flexible Substrate\n8 ASTM D1505 Standard Test Method for Density of Plastics by the Density-Gradient Technique\n9 ASTM D1603 Standard Test Method for Carbon Black in Olefin Plastics\n10 ASTM D1777 Standard Test Method for Measuring Thickness of Textile Materials\n11 ASTM D4218 Test Method for Carbon Black Content in Polyethylene Compounds by the\n12 Muffle-Fumace Technique\n13 ASTM D4716 Standard Test Method for Constant Head Hydraulic Transmissivity (In-Plane\n14 Flow) of Geotextiles and Geotextile Related Products\n15 ASTM D5199 Standard Test Method for Measuring Nominal Thickness of Geotextiles and\n16 Geomembranes\n17 ASTM D5321 Standard Test Method for Determining the Coefficient of Soil and Geosynthetic\n18 or Geosynthetic and Geosynthetic Friction by the Direct Shear Method\n19 GEOSYNTHETIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE (GRI)\n20 GRI-GC7 Determination of Adhesion and Bond Strength of Geocomposites description:\n21 The work includes manufacture, fabrication (if needed), supply, and installation of geocomposite\n22 (hereinafter referred to as composite drainage net (CDN)) drainage layers associated with the lining of\n23 waste disposal facility. The CDN shall consist of a layer of geotextile thermally bonded to each side of a\n24 geonet. Requirements for geotextiles are contained in Section 02371, GEOTEXTILES, of these\n25 Specifications. Requirements for geonets and the finished CDN are contained in this section.\n26 Submittals-Approval Required\n27 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n28 Manufacturer's descriptive data, specification sheets, literature, and other data as necessary to fully\n29 demonstrate that those materials proposed for use comply with the requirements of these\n30 Specifications.\n31 Construction General Contractor shall submit required interface strength data, as specified in\n32 PART 2-PRODUCTS, prior to shipment of material to allow Engineer to evaluate if submitted\n33 material meets strength requirements for project design criteria. Allow Engineer 20 working days for\n34 this evaluation upon receipt of data.\n35 Installation Plan: The Construction General Contractor shall submit a plan describing the proposed\n36 methods for CDN deployment, panel layout, seaming, repair, and protection. The plan shall include a\n37 quality assurance program for the Construction General Contractor's activities related to CDN\n38 installation.\n39 Manufacturer's Quality Control (QC) test data for CDN composition and physical properties, verifying\n40 compliance with these Specifications. The data shall include roll numbers, test results, and test methods.\n41 Frequency of manufacturer's QC testing shall be at the standard rate stated in the manufacturer's QC\n42 plan.\nAppendix 4D.34\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Manufacturer's written certifications that CDN satisfy the requirements of these Specifications.\n2 Construction Quality Assurance (CQA)\n3 Quality assurance procedures for CDN installation are presented in the Construction Quality\n4 Assurance Plan (CQA Plan). CQA Plan requirements are discussed in Section 02661,\n5 GEOMEMBRANE. The Construction General Contractor shall accommodate all quality assurance\n6 activities described herein and in the CQA Plan for this project.\n7 Prior to placing any materials over the installed CDN, the Construction General Contractor shall\n8 allow time for acceptance of the Work as listed in the CQA Plan.\n9 CQA conformance testing: Upon delivery of the rolls of geonet and CDN, the CQA Certifying\n10 Engineer will obtain samples at a frequency of one per production lot or one per 50,000 square feet of\n11 each material type, whichever results in the greater number of tests; transmissivity shall be as noted\n12 below. The CQA Certifying Engineer will test the samples to determine conformance to both the design\n13 specifications and the list of certified properties.\n14 CDN fabricated from non-conforming components shall be rejected at the Construction General\n15 Contractor's expense.\n16 As a minimum, the following tests will be performed on geonets:\n17 Polymer specific gravity (ASTM D1505).\n18 Thickness (ASTM D5199).\n19 Nominal transmissivity (ASTM D4716 -one per production lot).\n20 As a minimum, the following tests will be performed on CDNs:\n21 Adhesion (GRI-GC7 or ASTM D413).\n22 Transmissivity (ASTM D4716 -one per production lot).\n23 The CQA Certifying Engineer shall be allowed to remove samples of geonet and CDN for testing and\n24 other activities. Sample dimensions, procedures, and frequency shall be the same as those specified\n25 in the CQA Plan. The Construction General Contractor shall assist the CQA Certifying Engineer as\n26 necessary in all sampling and testing activities.\n27 Procedures for samples that fail conformance testing are outlined in the CQA Plan. The cost of\n28 additional conformance testing to demonstrate compliance of failed samples shall be borne by the\n29 Construction General Contractor.\n30 Part 2 -Products\n31 General\n32 Composition: The geonet shall be high-density polyethylene (HDPE), manufactured by extruding two\n33 crossing strands to form a bi-planar drainage net structure.\n34 The CDN shall consist of Type I geotextile thermally bonded to each side of the HDPE geonet.\n35 Manufacturer: The CDN manufacturer shall have a minimum of 5 years' experience as a commercial\n36 manufacturer of CDNs for landfill drainage applications.\n37 Required Properties\n38 Property Values\n39 Geonet: Geonet properties shall meet or exceed the values specified in the table of required geonet\n40 properties contained in this section of the Specifications.\n41 Geotextile: Geotextile properties shall meet or exceed the values specified in Section 02371,\n42 GEOTEXTILES, of these Specifications unless otherwise approved by the Engineer.\nAppendix 4D.35\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Finished CDN: CDN properties shall meet or exceed the values specified in the table of required CDN\n2 properties contained in this section of the Specifications.\n3 Required Interface Shear Strength Data:\n4 Provide data prior to material shipment for the interface friction angle between the CDN and textured\n5 geomembrane, and between the CDN and operations layer material, as specified in Article\n6 SUBMITTALS. Perform two interface shear strength tests on each interface. Friction angle shall be\n7 determined by direct shear testing under fully saturated conditions (ASTM D5321) at nominal normal\n8 loads of 100, 250, and 500 psf. Report results for both peak and large displacement (minimum\n9 2 inches) strength.\n10 The Engineer will review this data for conformance with project design strength requirements.\n11 Construction General Contractor shall not order material for shipment until approved by Engineer.\n12 Any product or material changes required as a result of inadequate strength data will be addressed by\n13 Change Order provided submitted material meet all other requirements of this section.\n14 Manufacturer's Information: The manufacturer shall provide specification sheets, literature, and test\n15 results for all properties listed in these Specifications. The manufacturer shall certify that the materials\n16 supplied meet the requirements of this Part.\n17 Integrity: Geonets and CDNs shall retain their structure during handling, placement, and long-term\n18 service.\n19 Transportation, Handling, and Storage\n20 Geonets and CDNs shall be supplied in rolls wrapped in covers and marked or tagged with the roll\n21 number. Each material roll shall include information to demonstrate material traceability through\n22 written documentation from the manufacturer and transport company. At a minimum, this\n23 information shall include the Manufacturer's Name, Product Identification, Lot Number, and Roll\n24 Dimension (Area and Width).\n25 Transportation of the CDN to the site and all handling on site will be the responsibility of the\n26 Construction General Contractor.\n27 During shipment and storage, the geonet and CDN shall be protected from mud, dirt, UV exposure,\n28 dust, puncture, cutting, or other damaging or deleterious conditions. Protective wrappings, which are\n29 damaged, shall be repaired or replaced, as necessary.\n30 The Construction General Contractor shall be responsible for the storage of the CDN on site within\n31 the limits of construction. The Construction General Contractor shall protect storage area(s) from\n32 theft, vandalism, passage of vehicles, etc.\n33 Part 3 -Execution\n34 General\n35 Unacceptable Materials and Work: Materials and Work, which fail to meet the requirements of these\n36 Specifications, shall be removed, disposed of, and replaced at the Construction General Contractor's\n37 expense.\n38 Handling And Placement\n39 The Construction General Contractor shall handle all CDNs in such a manner as to ensure that these\n40 materials are not damaged.\n41 Clean geomembrane surface prior to placing CDN.\n42 On slopes, CDN may be deployed over slip-sheets with the roll at the top of the slope. An alternative\n43 method is to secure the CDN anid then roll it down slope in a manner to continually keep it in tension.\n44 If necessary, position the CDN after deployment to minimize wrinkles and remove the slip-sheet, if\n45 used.\nAppendix 4D.36\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Do not drag the CDN across textured geomembrane in any way that damages the geotextile\n2 component or reduces the friction at the geomembrane/CDN interface.\n3 In the presence of wind, all exposed CDNs shall be weighted with sandbags or equivalent. Sandbags\n4 shall be installed during CDN placement and shall remain until replaced with cover material.\n5 Unless otherwise specified, CDNs shall not be welded to geomembranes.\n6 CDNs shall only be cut using approved cutting tools. Protect underlying geosynthetics when cutting.\n7 The Construction General Contractor shall take any necessary precautions to prevent damage to\n8 underlying layers during placement of the CDN.\n9 During placement of CDNs, care shall be taken not to entrap dirt or excessive dust that could cause\n10 clogging of the drainage system, and/or stones that could damage the adjacent geomembrane. Dirt or\n11 excessive dust entrapped in the CDN shall be cleaned prior to placement of the next material on top\n12 of it. Excessive dust is defined as any thickness greater than 20 mils (0.02 inch) within the geonet\n13 core of the CDN. In this regard, care shall be taken with the handling of sandbags, to prevent rupture\n14 or damage of the sandbag.\n15 Tools shall not be left in the CDN.\n16 After deployment, all CDN shall be covered within a maximum period of 14 days to prevent exposure\n17 of geotextile component to ultraviolet (UV) radiation (sunlight). See Section 02371,\n18 GEOTEXTILES, for requirements of geotextile exposed to UV radiation longer than 14 days.\n19 Jing\n20 Adjacent sections of CDN shall be overlapped according to the manufacturer's directions.\n21 Overlaps shall be secured by spot welding or tying. Acceptable tying devices include strings, plastic\n22 fasteners, or polymer braid. Tying devices shall be white or yellow for easy observation. Metallic\n23 devices are not allowed.\n24 Overlaps shall be secured every 5 feet along slopes and on the floor of the landfill. Overlaps shall be secured\n25 every 6 inches in anchor trenches. Along end-to-end seams, spot-weld, or tie each row at 6-inch intervals;\n26 stagger weld or ties between rows.\n27 In joining CDNs, tearing the geotextile away from the geonet shall only be allowed at panels ends in\n28 order to seam same material components together and shall be minimized to the extent necessary to\n29 perform the required work.\n30 No horizontal seams shall be allowed on side slopes except at roll ends.\n31 If more than one layer of CDN is installed, joints shall be staggered.\n32 Repair\n33 Remove the damaged area of CDN.\n34 Cut a piece of geonet to fit into the repair area. Geonet shall fit into repair area to form a flush surface\n35 with the CDN. Cut geonet so that ribs are in the same orientation as existing CDN.\n36 Remove any dirt or other foreign material, which may have entered the CDN.\n37 Place CDN patch over damaged area. Geonet component of patch shall be tied to in-place geonet\n38 component according to manufacturer's recommendations.\n39 Place Type I geotextile over the exposed geonet component with an overlap of 4 inches of geotextile.\n40 Heat seam repair geotextile to existing geotextile.\nAppendix 4D.37\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Materials in Contact With CDNs\n2 The Construction General Contractor shall place all soil materials located on top of a CDN layer in such a\n3 manner as to ensure that the following conditions are satisfied:\n4 No damage to the CDN.\n5 No slippage of the CDN on underlying layers.\n6 No excess tensile stresses in the CDN.\n7 END OF SECTION 02373\n8\nAppendix 4D.38\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Table 1. Required Geonet Properties\nProperty Qualifier Unit Value Test\nPolymer Composition Minimum % polyethylene 95\nResin Specific Gravity Minimum N/A 0.92 ASTM D1505\nCarbon Black Content Range %2 -3 ASTM D1603 or D4218\nNominal Thickness MARV mils 250 ASTM D1777 or D5199\nNominal Transmissivity\"') MARV m2/sec 3 x 10- ASTM D4716\n2 Table 2. Required CDN Properties\nProperty Qualifier Unit Value Test\nPly Adhesion ARV lb/in 1.0 ASTM D413 or GRI-GC7\nTransmissivity(') MARV m2/sec 5 x 10-4 ASTM D4716\n3 Notes:\n4 MARV = Minimum Average Roll Value.\n5 ARV = Average Roll Value.\n6 O1)The design transmissivity is the hydraulic transmissivity of the CDN measured using water at\n7 70 degrees F +3 degrees F with a hydraulic gradient of 0.1, under the compressive stress of 10,000 psf.\n8 Transmissivity value shall be measured between two steel plates 15 minutes after application of the\n9 confining stress in the machine direction.\nAppendix 4D.39\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 02500 -RAW WATER CONVEYANCE PIPING -GENERAL SCHED. A & B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 Summary\n4 This section is for furnishing and installing raw water piping and associated components.\n5 References\n6 The following is a list of standards, which may be referenced in this section:\n7 AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE (ACI)\n8 ACI 301 Standard Specification for Structural Concrete\n9 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION (AWWA)\n10 AWWA CH IO/A21.10 Ductile-Iron and Gray-Iron Fittings, 3 in. Through 48 in. (75 mm Through\n11 1200 mm), for Water and Other Liquids\n12 AWWA Cl 15/A21.15 Flanged Ductile-Iron Pipe with Ductile-Iron or Gray-Iron Threaded Flanges\n13 AWWA C207 Steel Pipe Flanges for Waterworks Service -Sizes 4 in. Through 144 in.\n14 (100 mm Through 3,600 mm)\n15 AWWA C210 Liquid-Epoxy Coating Systems for the Interior and Exterior of Steel Water\n16 Pipelines\n17 AWWA C213 Fusion-Bonded Epoxy Coating for the Interior and Exterior of Steel Water\n18 Pipelines\n19 AWWA C217 Cold-Applied Petroleum Tape and Petroleum Wax Tape Coatings for the\n20 Exterior of Special Sections, Connections, and Fittings for Buried Steel\n21 Water Pipelines\n22 AWWA C219 Bolted, Sleeve-Type Couplings for Plain-End Pipe\n23 AWWA C221 Fabricated Steel Mechanical Slip-Type Expansion Joints\n24 AWWA C606 Grooved and Shouldered Joints\n25 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n26 ASTM A497 Standard Specification for Steel Welded Wire Fabric, Deformed, for\n27 Concrete Reinforcement\n28 ASTM A615/A615M Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Billet-Steel Bars for Concrete\n29 Reinforcement\n30 ASTM C94/C94M Standard Specification for Ready-Mixed Concrete\n31 ASTM C150 Standard Specification for Portland Cement\n32 NSF INTERNATIONAL (NSF)\n33 NSF 61B Drinking Water System Components -Health Effects\n34 Submittals-Approval Required\n35 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n36 Detailed pipe fabrication drawings showing pipe details, special fittings and bends, dimensions,\n37 coatings, and other pertinent information.\n38 Documentation for pipe pressure class.\nAppendix 4D.40\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Submittals-Approval Not Required\n2 Information/Record (IR)\n3 Submit results of pressure leakage testing for raw water conveyance piping.\n4 Submit results for materials and test certificate after completion of the system in accordance with\n5 NFPA 24 Chapter 9.\n6 Delivery, Storage, And Handlinq\n7 In accordance with manufacturer's recommendations.\n8 Marking at Plant:\n9 Mark each pipe and fitting at plant. Include date of manufacture, manufacturer's identification,\n10 specification standard, diameter of pipe, dimension ratio, pipe class, and other information required\n11 for type of pipe.\n12 Pipe, specials, and fittings received at Project site in damaged condition will not be accepted.\n13 Gasket Storage:\n14 Store rubber gaskets in cool, well-ventilated place, and do not expose to direct rays of sun. Do not\n15 allow contact with oils, fuels, petroleum, or solvents.\n16 Store and support pipe securely to prevent accidental rolling and to avoid contact with mud, water, or\n17 other deleterious materials.\n18 Handling:\n19 Pipe shall be handled with proper equipment in a manner to prevent distortion or damage. Use of\n20 hooks, chains, wire ropes, or clamps that could damage pipe, damage coating or lining, or kink and\n21 bend pipe ends is not permitted.\n22 Use heavy canvas, or nylon slings of suitable strength for lifting and supporting materials.\n23 Lifting pipe during unloading or lifting into trench shall be done using two slings placed at quarter\n24 point of pipe section. Pipe may be lifted using one sling near center of pipe, provided pipe is guided\n25 to prevent uncontrolled swinging and no damage will result to pipe or harm to workmen. Slings shall\n26 bear uniformly against pipe.\n27 Pipe and fittings shall not be stored on rocks or gravel, or other hard material that might damage pipe.\n28 This includes storage area and along pipe trench.\n29 Part 2 -Products\n30 Pipe\n31 As specified in Section 02502, RAW WATER DUCTILE IRON PIPE AND FITTINGS, Section 02509,\n32 RAW WATER POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) PRESSURE PIPE AND FITTINGS, and the Carbon\n33 Steel Pipe and Galvanized Steel Pipe Data Sheets attached to this section.\n34 Joints\n35 As specified in Section 02502, RAW WATER DUCTILE IRON PIPE AND FITTINGS, Section 02509,\n36 RAW WATER POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) PRESSURE PIPE AND FITTINGS, and the Carbon\n37 Steel Pipe and Galvanized Steel Pipe Data Sheets attached to this section.\n38 Flexible Lock Couplings\n39 General:\n40 Couplings shall be rated for 173 PSI.\n41 Buried, bolted, sleeve-type couplings shall be lined and coated with fusion-bonded epoxy in\n42 accordance with AWWA C213.\nAppendix 4D.41\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Locking pins shall be integral to coupling, number and diameter of pins per manufacturer's standard.\n2 For Pipe with Plain-Ends:\n3 Bolted, sleeve-type coupling, in accordance with AWWA C219.\n4 Manufacturer of couplings shall observe same quality control requirements as specified in\n5 AWWA C221 for fabrication of pipe expansion joints.\n6 Manufacturers and Products: Dresser; Style 167.\n7 Service Saddles\n8 Double strap type with minimum strap width of 2 inches.\n9 Straps shall be Type 304 stainless steel. Saddles shall be ductile iron, epoxy-coated, 10 mils\n10 minimum thickness.\n11 Minimum Pressure Rating: 200 psi.\n12 Flanges, Flanqe Gaskets, and Bolting Materials\n13 As specified in individual raw water specifications for each piping material.\n14 Concrete For Thrust Blocks\n15 Thrust Block Concrete: As specified in Section 03301, CONCRETE.\n16 Reinforcing Steel: ASTM A615/A615M, Grade 60 deformed bars.\n17 Welded Wire Fabric: ASTM A497.\n18 Formwork: Plywood; earth cuts may be used as approved by Construction Manager.\n19 Locator Ribbon\n20 As specified in Section 02320, TRENCH BACKFILL.\n21 Pipe Bedding And Pipe Zone Material\n22 Granular material as specified in Section 02320, TRENCH BACKFILL.\n23 Trench Stabilization Material:\n24 As specified in Section 02320, TRENCH BACKFILL.\n25 Part 3 -Execution\n26 General\n27 Installation shall be in accordance with NFPA 24 Standard for the Installation of Private Service\n28 Mains and Their Appurtenances.\n29 Notify Construction Manager at least 2 weeks prior to field fabrication of pipe or fittings.\n30 Furnish feeler gauges of proper size, type, and shape for use during installation for each type of pipe\n31 furnished.\n32 Distributing Materials: Place materials along trench only as will be used each day, unless otherwise\n33 approved by Construction Manager. Placement of materials shall not be hazardous to traffic or to general\n34 public, obstruct access to adjacent property, or obstruct others working in area.\n35 Examination\n36 Verify size, material, joint types, elevation, and horizontal location of existing pipeline to be\n37 connected to new pipeline or new equipment.\n38 Inspect size and location of structure penetrations to verify adequacy of wall pipes, sleeves, and other\n39 openings.\nAppendix 4D.42\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Damaged Coatings and Linings: Repair using coating and lining materials in accordance with\n2 manufacturer's instructions.\n3 Preparation Of Trench\n4 Prepare trench as specified in Section 02316, EXCAVATION.\n5 Unless otherwise permitted by Construction Manager, maximum length of open trench shall not\n6 exceed 500 feet.\n7 Installation\n8 General\n9 Join pipe and fittings in accordance with manufacturer's instructions, unless otherwise shown or\n10 specified.\n11 Install individual pipe lengths in according to approved lay diagram. Misplaced pipe shall be\n12 removed and replaced.\n13 Inspect pipe and fittings before installation, clean ends thoroughly, remove foreign matter and dirt\n14 from inside.\n15 Flanged Joints: Install perpendicular to pipe centerline.\n16 Bolt Holes:\n17 Straddle vertical centerline, aligned with connecting equipment flanges or as shown on Drawings.\n18 Use torque-limiting wrenches to provide uniform bearing and proper bolt tightness.\n19 Flange Type: Use flat-faced flange when joining with flat-faced ductile or cast iron flange.\n20 Couplings:\n21 Install in accordance with manufacturer's written instructions.\n22 Before coupling, clean pipe holdback area of oil, scale, rust, and dirt.\n23 Remove pipe coating, if necessary, to obtain smooth surface.\n24 Clean gaskets before installation.\n25 If necessary, lubricate with gasket lubricant for installation on pipe ends.\n26 Tighten coupling bolts progressively; drawing up bolts on opposite sides gradually until bolts have\n27 uniform tightness.\n28 Buried Pressure Pipe\n29 Placement:\n30 Keep trench dry until pipe laying and joining is completed.\n31 Exercise care when lowering pipe into trench to prevent twisting or damage to pipe.\n32 Excavate trench bottom and sides of ample dimensions to permit proper joining, visual inspection,\n33 and testing of entire joint.\n34 Prevent foreign material from entering pipe during placement.\n35 Close and block open end of last laid pipe section when placement operations are not in progress and\n36 at close of day's work.\n37 In general, lay pipe upgrade with bell ends pointing in direction of laying.\n38 Deflect pipe at joints for pipelines laid on a curve using unsymmetrical closure of spigot into bell.\n39 Pipe joints shall be pushed together in straight alignment and then deflected. If joint deflection of\n40 standard pipe lengths will not accommodate horizontal or vertical curves in alignment, provide:\nAppendix 4D.43\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Shorter pipe lengths.\n2 Special mitered joints.\n3 Standard or special fabricated bends.\n4 Check gasket position with feeler gauge to assure proper seating.\n5 After joint has been made, check pipe alignment and grade.\n6 Place sufficient pipe zone material to secure pipe from movement before next joint is installed.\n7 Prevent uplift and floating of pipe prior to backfilling.\n8 Tolerances:\n9 Deflection From Horizontal Line: Maximum 2 inches.\n10 Deflection From Vertical Line: Maximum 1 inch.\n11 Joint Deflection:\n12 Maximum of 75 percent of manufacturer's recommendation.\n13 Horizontal position of pipe centerline on alignment around curves maximum variation of 1 foot from\n14 position shown.\n15 Cover Over Top of Pipe: Minimum 3.5 feet, unless otherwise shown.\n16 Disposal of Excess Excavated Material: As specified in Section 02316, EXCAVATION.\n17 Thrust Restraint\n18 Location: At pipeline tees, plugs, caps, bends, and locations where unbalanced forces exist.\n19 Thrust Blockinq\n20 Quantity of Concrete:\n21 Sufficient to cover bearing area of pipe and provide required soil-bearing area as shown on Drawings.\n22 For vertical bends, concrete shall be sufficient to provide required volume as shown on Drawings.\n23 Place blocking so pipe and fitting joints are accessible for repairs.\n24 Place concrete in accordance with Section 03301, CONCRETE.\n25 Corrosion Protection\n26 Buried Pipe:\n27 As specified in the individual specifications following this section.\n28 Notify Construction Manager at least 3 days prior to start of surface preparation, coating application,\n29 and corrosion protection work.\n30 Placement Of Pipe Locator Ribbon\n31 Place pipe locator ribbon in accordance with Section 02320, TRENCH BACKFILL.\n32 Pipe Bedding And Zone Material\n33 Place pipe bedding and pipe zone material in accordance with Section 02320, TRENCH BACKFILL.\n34 Construction Quality Control\n35 Pressure Leakage Testing for Raw Water Ductile Iron and PVC: As specified in the individual\n36 piping Specification(s) following this section.\n37 Pressure Leakage Testing for Raw Water Carbon Steel Pipe and Fittings and Valves Upstream of\n38 12-Inch Gate Valve:\nAppendix 4D.44\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Shop Test: After fabrication of carbon steel spools (as specified in carbon steel pipe supplement at the\n2 end of this section) and prior to lining or coating, blind flanges shall be installed on each flange. One\n3 blind flange shall be tapped as necessary for a test port. A hydrostatic leak test shall be performed at\n4 173 psig for 30 minutes; no visible leaks shall be allowed.\n5 Field Test: An in-service leak test shall be performed with excavation open. Retighten bolts on\n6 fittings/valves as necessary and within manufacturer's recommendations to stop any visible leaks.\n7 Pressure Leakage Testing for Raw Water Galvanized Steel Pipe and Malleable Iron Fittings:\n8 Perform in conjunction with leakage test for raw water ductile iron and PVC.\n9 Supplements\n10 Supplement 1-Carbon Steel Pipe and Fittings.\n11 Supplement 2-Galvanized Steel Pipe and Malleable Iron Fittings.\n12 END OF SECTION 02500\n13\n14\nAppendix 4D.45\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTable 1. Carbon Steel Pipe and Fittings\nItem Size Description\nPipe 24\" Black carbon steel, ASTM A 106, Grade B seamless or ASTM A53, Grade B\nseamless or ERW. Threaded, butt-welded, and flanged joints:\nSchedule 20 (24\" OD, 0.375\" wall thickness)\nFor pressure testing purposes of 24\" OD flange x plain end spools, initially\nconstruct one flange x flange spool. After completion of pressure testing per Article\nCONSTRUCTION QUALITY CONTROL of this Specification section, the flange\nx flange spool shall be cut in half. Each half shall then be coated, lined, and\ninstalled per the Drawings. Other flange x flange spools shall be pressure tested\nprior to coating and lining per Article CONSTRUCTION QUALITY CONTROL.\nJoints Flanged at valves as shown\nFlanges Forged carbon steel, ASTM AI05/A105M, ANSI B16.5 Class 150 slip-on or\nwelding neck; weld neck bore to match pipe internal diameter.\nWelding shall conform to AWS Dl. 1, AWWA C206, approved welding procedures,\nand referenced welding codes. In case of conflict, AWS D1.1 shall govern.\nBolting All Carbon steel ASTM Al93/Al93M, Grade B7 studs and ASTM Al94/Al94M,\nGrade 2H hex head nuts.\nWhen mating flange on equipment is cast iron and gasket is flat ring, provide\nASTM A307, Grade B hex head bolts and ASTM A563, Grade A heavy hex nuts.\nGaskets All General Service and Oil/Gas: 1/16\" thick compressed nonasbestos composition flat\nring type. Garlock, Style 3000; Manville, Style 978.\nCoating General: Holdback of, and coating shall be as follows: For flex couplings, 8 inches.\nEpoxy Coating:\nCoating system for pipe and flanges (except machined surfaces) shall conform to\nAWWA C210.\nPaint system for coating shall be Tnemec Series 141 (Color WHO3) or approved\nequal. Completed coating shall have a total dry film thickness of 16 mils minimum.\nApplication of epoxy coatings shall be in accordance with federal, state, and local\nregulations.\nCoatings shall be shop-applied, except for field repairs and holdback areas.\nMaterials shall be suitable for temperatures that may be encountered in Project\nlocation, and for time of year when materials are being applied and pipeline is being\ninstalled.\nCoating shall be tested in accordance with AWWA C210. Defects shall be repaired\nin accordance with AWWA C210.\nFurnish and apply in field, coat tar epoxy paint, Koppers 300M, or equal, on\nholdback areas after installation of flex couplings and at damaged coating locations.\nLining Epoxy Lining: Conform to AWWA C210.\nLining shall be an epoxy system suitable for potable water service (listed by\nNational Sanitation Foundation Standard 61). Paint system for lining shall be\nTnemec Series 141 (Color WHO3) or approved equal. Completed lining shall have\na total dry film thickness of 10 mils minimum.\n2\n3\nAppendix 4D.46\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTable 2. Galvanized Steel Pipe and Malleable Iron Fittings\nItem Size Description\nPipe Galvanized carbon steel, ASTM A106, Grade B seamless or\nASTM A53, Grade B seamless or ERW.\n2\" and smaller Schedule 80.\n2-1/2\" through 6\" Schedule 40\nJoints All Threaded or flanged at valves and equipment.\nFittings Threaded: 150- or 300-pound galvanized malleable iron,\nASTM A197 or ASTM A47, dimensions in accordance with\nANSI B 16.3.\nFlanges Galvanized forged carbon steel, ASTM A105/AI05M, ANSI B16.5\nClass 150 or Class 300, threaded, 1/16-inch raised face.\nUnions Threaded malleable iron, ASTM A197 or A47, 300-pound WOG,\nbrass to iron seat, meeting the requirements of ANSI B 16.3.\nBolting Flanges: Carbon steel ASTM A307, Grade A hex head bolts, and\nASTM A563, Grade A hex head nuts.\nGaskets All flanges Flanged, Water and Sewage Service: 1/8 inch thick, red rubber\n(SBR), hardness 80 (Shore A), rated to 200 degrees F, conforming to\nANSI B16.21, AWWA C207, and ASTM D1330, Grades 1 and 2.\nThread 2\" & smaller Teflon tape or joint compound that is insoluble in\nLubricant Water\nAppendix 4D.47\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 02502 -RAW WATER DUCTILE IRON PIPE AND FITTINGS SCHED. A\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 Summary\n4 This section is for furnishing and installing 6-inch ductile iron raw water piping and associated\n5 components.\n6 References\n7 The following is a list of standards that may be referenced in this section:\n8 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS\n9 (AASHTO)\n10 AASHTO T99 Standard Specification for the Moisture-Density Relations of Soils Using a 2.5 kg\n11 (5.5LB) Hammer and a 3 05mm (12 in.) Drop\n12 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION (AWWA)\n13 AWWA C104 Cement-Mortar Lining for Ductile Iron Pipe and Fittings for Water\n14 AWWA C105 Polyethylene Encasement for Ductile Iron Pipe Systems\n15 AWWA C110 Ductile Iron and Grey Iron-Fittings, 3-inch through 48-inch\n16 AWWA C 111 Rubber-Gasket Joints for Ductile Iron Pressure Pipe and Fittings.\n17 AWWA C 115 Flanged Ductile Iron Pipe with Ductile Iron and Grey Iron Fittings\n18 AWWA C150 Thickness Design of Ductile-Iron Pipe\n19 AWWA C 151 Ductile-Iron Pipe. Centrifugally Cast, for Water\n20 AWWA C153 Ductile Iron Compact Fittings, 3-inch through 24-inch and 54-inch through\n21 64-inch for Water Service\n22 AWWA C207 Steel Pipe Flanges for Waterworks Service, Sizes 4-inch Through 144-inch\n23 (100mm through 3600mm)\n24 AWWA C600 Installation of Ductile-Iron Water Mains and Their Appurtenances\n25 AWWA C606 Grooved End, Shouldered Joints\n26 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n27 ASTM A307 Standard Specification for Carbon Steel Bolts and Studs, 60,000 psi Tensile\n28 Strength\n29 ASTM A563 Standard Specification for Carbon and Alloy Steel Nuts\n30 ASTM B16.21 Standard Specification for Nonmetallic Flat Gaskets for Pipe Flanges\n31 ASTM D882 Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Thin Plastic Sheeting\n32 ASTM D1330 Standard Specification for Rubber Sheet Gaskets\n33 ASTM D1922 Standard Test Method for Propagation Tear Resistance of Plastic Film and Thin\n34 Sheeting by Pendulum Method\n35 ASTM D2000 Standard Classification System for Rubber Products in Automotive Applications\n36 ASIM D4976 Standard Specification for Polyethylene Plastics Molding and Extrusion\n37 Materials\n38 DUCTILE IRON PIPE RESEARCH INSTITUTE (DIPRA)\nAppendix 4D.48\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Submittals-Approval Required\n2 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n3 Flushing Procedure: The flushing procedure shall outline the method and materials for handling flush\n4 water, i.e., pipe, valves, fittings for filling pipeline and similar for discharging flush water, method for\n5 restraining aboveground pipe, and preventing erosion damage.\n6 Field Hydrostatic Testing Plan: Submit at least 15 days prior to testing and at minimum, include the\n7 following:\n8 Testing dates.\n9 Piping systems and section(s) to be tested.\n10 Method of isolation.\n11 Method of conveying water from source to system being tested.\n12 Calculation of maximum allowable leakage for piping section(s) to be tested.\n13 Certifications of Calibration: Approved testing laboratory certificate if pressure gauge for hydrostatic\n14 test has been previously used. If pressure gauge is new, no certificate is required.\n15 As-Built Survey Data: Before final acceptance of raw water piping system, provide as-built locations of\n16 systems and components, showing pressure pipelines, including grade breaks or alignment, horizontal and\n17 vertical locations of all utility crossings, finished grade profile on all alignments, and valve locations.\n18 The submitted data shall be certified by a Washington licensed land surveyor.\n19 Shop Drawings: Marking plan and details of standard pipe section showing dimensions, pipe joints,\n20 fitting and special fitting pressure rating and thickness, size, coating and lining data.\n21 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n22 Information/Record (IR): Hydrostatic test documentation form and results.\n23 Part 2 -Products\n24 Materials\n25 Pipe:\n26 General:\n27 Centrifugally cast, grade 60-42-10 iron.\n28 Meet requirements of AWWA C150, C153, and C1 11.\n29 Lined and coated as specified.\n30 Pipe wall thickness Class 50.\n31 Pipe wall thickness of threaded pipe for a flanged pipe end shall be minimum special thickness\n32 Class 53 from 12-inch to 54-inch diameter pipe in accordance with AWWA C 115.\n33 Grooved end pipe, for all pipe diameters, shall be minimum Special Class 53.\n34 Pipe shall be new and recently manufactured. Refurbished pipe shall not be provided.\n35 Joints:\n36 Push-On Joint: Rated at minimum working pressure equal to pipe material design.\n37 Restrained Joint: Manufactured proprietary joint that mechanically restrains pipe to adjoining pipe.\n38 Manufacturers and Products:\n39 American Cast Iron Pipe; Flex-Ring and Lok-Ring.\n40 Pacific States Pipe; Thrust-Lock.\nAppendix 4D.49\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 U.S. Pipe; TR Flex.\n2 Mechanical Wedge Action Type Joint:\n3 Use only in areas where adjoining to fixed points where laying length is determined in field.\n4 Prior to purchase and installation, type and application of this joint shall be approved by Construction\n5 Manager.\n6 Use of setscrews for restraint or field-lock gaskets shall not be allowed.\n7 Flanged Joint: Threaded 250 psi working pressure ductile iron flanges conforming to AWWA C 115.\n8 Fittings:\n9 Ductile Iron, Push-On, Flanged, or Restrained Joint: In accordance with AWWA Cl 10, at 250 psi\n10 minimum working pressure for 3- to 24-inch fittings and 150-psi minimum working pressure for 30- to\n11 48-inch fittings.\n12 Mechanical Joint Fittings: In accordance with AWWA Cl l 1.\n13 Fittings shall be new and recently manufactured. Refurbished fittings will not be accepted.\n14 Welded Outlet: Only weld to pipe in manufacturer's shop.\n15 Lining: Pipe and fittings for clean water applications shall be cement lined and asphaltic seal coated in\n16 accordance with AWWA C 104.\n17 Coating: Asphaltic type, 1 mil thick, in accordance with AWWA C151, C 115, Cl 10, and C153.\n18 Bolting: Bolts for flanged connections shall be carbon steel, ASTM A307, Grade A hex bolts and\n19 ASTM A563, Grade A hex head nuts.\n20 Gaskets: Gaskets for flat faced 150 and 250 psi working pressure flanges shall be 1/8 inch thick, red\n21 rubber (SBR), hardness 80 (Shore A), rated to 200 degrees F, conforming to ANSI B16.21,\n22 AWWA C207, and ASTM D1330, Grades I and 2.\n23 Part 3 -Execution\n24 Examination\n25 Inspect pipe and fittings to ensure no cracked, broken, or otherwise defective materials are being used.\n26 Preparation\n27 Trench Grade:\n28 Grade bottom of trench by hand to specified line and grade, with proper allowance for pipe thickness\n29 and pipe base, when specified. Trench bottom shall form a continuous and uniform bearing and\n30 support for pipe between bell holes.\n31 Before laying each section of pipe, check grade and correct irregularities found. Grade may be\n32 disturbed for removal of lifting tackle.\n33 Bell (Joint) Holes: At each joint, dig bell holes of ample dimensions in bottom of trench, and at sides\n34 where necessary, to permit joint to be made properly and to permit easy visual inspection of entire joint.\n35 Installation\n36 General:\n37 Provide and use proper implements, tools, and facilities for safe and proper prosecution of work.\n38 Lower pipe, fittings, and appurtenances into trench, piece by piece, by means of a crane, slings, or\n39 other suitable tools and equipment, in such a manner as to prevent damage to pipe materials,\n40 protective coatings, and linings.\nAppendix 4D.50\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Do not drop or dump pipe materials into trench.\n2 Cleaning Pipe and Fittings:\n3 Remove lumps, blisters, and excess coal tar coating from bell and spigot ends of each pipe. Wire\n4 brush outside of spigot and inside of bell and wipe clean, dry, and free from oil and grease before pipe\n5 is laid.\n6 Wipe ends of mechanical joint pipe and fittings and of rubber gasket joint pipe and fittings clean of\n7 dirt, grease, and foreign matter.\n8 Laying Pipe:\n9 Direction of Laying: Lay pipe with bell end facing in direction of laying. For lines on an appreciable\n10 slope, face bells upgrade at discretion of Construction Manager.\n11 Mechanical Joint, Push-On Joint, and Restrained Joint Pipe:\n12 After first length of pipe is installed in trench, secure pipe in place with approved backfill material\n13 tamped under and along sides to prevent movement. Keep ends clear of backfill. After each section\n14 is jointed, place backfill as specified to prevent movement.\n15 Take precautions necessary to prevent floating of pipe prior to completion of backfill operation.\n16 When using movable trench shield, take necessary precautions to prevent pipe joints from pulling\n17 apart when moving shield ahead.\n18 Do not allow foreign material to enter pipe while it is being placed in trench.\n19 Close and block open end of last laid section of pipe to prevent entry of foreign material or creep of\n20 gasketed joints when laying operations are not in progress, at close of day's work, or whenever\n21 workers are absent from job.\n22 Joining Push-On Joint Pipe and Mechanical Joint Fittings:\n23 Join pipe with push-on joints and mechanical joint fittings in strict accordance with manufacturer's\n24 recommendations.\n25 Provide special tools and devices, such as, special jacks, chokers, and similar items required for\n26 installation.\n27 Lubricate pipe gaskets using lubricant furnished by pipe manufacturer. No substitutes will be\n28 permitted.\n29 Clean ends of fittings of dirt, mud, and foreign matter by washing with water and scrubbing with a\n30 wire brush, after which, slip gland and gasket on plain end of pipe. If necessary, lubricate end of pipe\n31 to facilitate sliding gasket in place, then guide fitting onto spigot of pipe previously laid.\n32 Cutting Pipe:\n33 General: Cut pipe for inserting valves, fittings, or closure pieces in a neat and workmanlike manner\n34 without damaging pipe or lining and to leave a smooth end, at right angles to axis of pipe.\n35 Pipe: Cut pipe with milling type cutter or saw. Do not flame cut.\n36 Dressing Cut Ends: Dress cut end of mechanical joint pipe to remove sharp edges or projections, which\n37 may damage rubber gasket. Dress cut ends of push-on joint pipe by beveling, as recommended by\n38 manufacturer.\n39 Field Welding:\n40 Use of field-welded outlets will not be allowed. Welding for outlets shall be performed only in pipe\n41 manufacturer's shop.\n42 Field installed outlets may be installed with saddle approved by Construction Manager. Opening in\n43 pipe shall be machined cut and not with cutting torch.\nAppendix 4D.51\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Field welding of bars for restrained joint systems will not be allowed. All welding shall be performed\n2 in pipe manufacturer's shop.\n3 Line and Grade:\n4 Minimum Pipe Cover: 3.5 feet, unless otherwise indicated.\n5 Install pipe to uniform grades and minimize high points.\n6 Maintain pipe grade between invert elevations.\n7 Deviations exceeding 6 inches from specified line or 1 inch from specified grade will not be allowed\n8 without express approval of Construction Manager.\n9 Pipeline sections that are not installed to elevations shown or installed as approved by Construction\n10 Manager shall be reinstalled to proper elevation.\n11 Construction Quality Control\n12 Cleaning:\n13 Following assembly and testing, and prior to final acceptance, flush pipelines with water at 2.5 fps\n14 minimum flushing velocity until foreign matter is removed.\n15 If impractical to flush large diameter pipe at 2.5 fps, clean pipe by use of pipe pig as approved by\n16 Construction Manager. Multiple passes of pipe pig may be required to adequately clean line.\n17 Remove accumulated debris through blowoffs 2 inches and larger or by removing spools and valves\n18 from piping.\n19 Pipeline Hydrostatic Test:\n20 General:\n21 Notify Construction Manager in writing 5 days in advance of testing. Construction Manager will\n22 coordinate with other parties required to witness testing. Perform testing in presence of Construction\n23 Manager.\n24 Test newly installed pipelines. Using water as test medium, pipes shall successfully pass a leakage\n25 test prior to acceptance.\n26 Furnish testing equipment and perform tests in manner satisfactory to Construction Manager. Testing\n27 equipment shall provide observable and accurate measurements of leakage under specified\n28 conditions.\n29 Isolate new pipelines that are connected to existing pipelines.\n30 Conduct tests on entire pipeline after trench has been backfilled. Testing may be done prior to\n31 placement of asphaltic concrete or roadway structural section.\n32 Construction General Contractor may, if field conditions permit and as determined by Construction\n33 Manager, partially backfill trench, and leave joints open for inspection and conduct an initial service\n34 leak test. Hydrostatic test shall not, however, be conducted until backfilling has been completed.\n35 Procedure:\n36 Maximum filling velocity shall not exceed 0.25 foot per second, calculated based on the full area of\n37 pipe.\n38 Expel air from pipe system during filling. Expel air through air release valve or through corporation\n39 stop installed at high points and other strategic points.\n40 Test pressure shall be 173 psi as measured at low point of pipeline.\n41 Apply and maintain specified test pressure with hydraulic force pump. Valve off piping system when\n42 test pressure is reached.\nAppendix 4D.52\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Maintain hydrostatic test pressure continuously for 2 hours minimum, adding additional make-up\n2 water only as necessary to restore test pressure.\n3 Determine actual leakage by measuring quantity of water necessary to maintain specified test pressure\n4 for duration of test.\n5 If measured leakage exceeds allowable leakage or if leaks are visible, repair defective pipe section\n6 and repeat hydrostatic test.\n7 Identify method of disposing of water after system testing.\n8 Allowable Leakage: Maximum allowable leakage shall not exceed amount stated in AWWA C600.\n9 END OF SECTION 02502\nAppendix 4D.53\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 02509 -RAW WATER POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) PRESSURE PIPE AND\n2 FITTINGS SCHED. A & B\n3 Part 1 -General\n4 Summary\n5 This section is for furnishing and installing 1-inch and 4-inch Schedule 80 solvent weld, 4-inch and\n6 12-inch bell and spigot, raw water piping and associated components.\n7 References\n8 The following is a list of standards, which may be referenced in this section:\n9 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION (AWWA)\n10 AWWA C1 10 Ductile-Iron and Gray-Iron Fittings, 3 inch Through 48 inch (75 mm\n11 Through 1200 mm), for Water and Other Liquids\n12 AWWA C605 Underground Installation of Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Pressure Pipe and\n13 Fittings for Water\n14 AWWA C900 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Pressure Pipe and Fabricated Fittings, 4 inch\n15 Through 12 inch (100 mm Through 300 mm), for Water Distribution\n16 AWWA C905 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Pressure Pipe and Fabricated Fittings, 14 inches\n17 Through 48 inches (350 mm Through 1,200 mm) for Water Transmission\n18 and Distribution\n19 AWWA C907 Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Pressure Fittings for Water, 4 inch Through 8 inch\n20 (100 mm Through 200 mm)\n21 AWWA Manual M23 PVC Pipe -Design and Installation\n22 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n23 ASTM D1784 Standard Specification for Rigid Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Compounds\n24 and Chlorinated Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Compounds\n25 ASTM D1785 Standard Specification for Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Plastic Pipe,\n26 Schedules 40, 80, and 120\n27 ASTM D2241 Standard Specification for Rigid Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (PVC)\n28 Pressure-Rated Pipe (SDR Series)\n29 ASTM D2321 Standard Practice for Underground Installation of Thermoplastic Pipe for\n30 Sewers and Other Gravity-Flow Applications\n31 ASTM D2467 Standard Specification for Socket-Type Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Plastic\n32 Pipe Fittings, Schedule 80\n33 ASTM D2564 Standard Specification for Solvent Cements for Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (PVC)\n34 Plastic Piping Systems\n35 ASTM D2672 Standard Specification for Joints for IPS PVC Pipe Using Solvent Cement\n36 ASTM D2855 Standard Practice for Making Solvent-Cemented Joints with Poly (Vinyl\n37 Chloride) (PVC) Pipe and Fittings\n38 ASTM D3139 Standard Specification for Joints for Plastic Pressure Pipes Using Flexible\n39 Elastomeric Seals\n40 NSF INTERNATIONAL (NSF)\nAppendix 4D.54\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Submittals-Approval Required\n2 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n3 Flushing Procedure: The flushing procedure shall outline the method and materials for handling flush\n4 water, i.e., pipe, valves, fittings for filling pipeline and similar for discharging flush water, method for\n5 restraining aboveground pipe, and preventing erosion damage.\n6 Qualifications:\n7 Solvent Welders: List of solvent welders and current test records for solvent welder(s) for field solvent\n8 welding.\n9 Hydrostatic Testing Plan: Submit at least 15 days prior to testing and at minimum, include the\n10 following:\n11 Testing dates.\n12 Piping systems and section(s) to be tested.\n13 Method of isolation.\n14 Method of conveying water from source to system being tested.\n15 Calculation of maximum allowable leakage for piping section(s) to be tested.\n16 Certification of Calibration: Approved testing laboratory certificate if pressure gauge for hydrostatic\n17 test has been previously used. If pressure gauge is new, no certificate is required.\n18 As-Built Survey Data: Before final acceptance of raw water piping system, provide as-built locations of\n19 systems and components, showing pressure pipelines, including grade breaks or alignment, horizontal and\n20 vertical locations of all utility crossings, finished grade profile on all alignments, and valve locations.\n21 The submitted data shall be certified by a Washington licensed land surveyor.\n22 Shop Drawings: Drawings showing pipe diameter, pipe class, and fitting details.\n23 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n24 Information/Record (IR): Hydrostatic test documentation form and results.\n25 Part 2 -Products\n26 Materials\n27 Bell and Spigot Pipe:\n28 PVC, conforming to requirements of AWWA C900.\n29 DR shall be 14, 200-psi pressure class.\n30 Joints:\n31 Rubber gasketed.\n32 Conform to AWWA C900.\n33 Fittings: Ductile iron, conforming to AWWA C153 or C1 10.\n34 Solvent Weld PVC Pipe and Fittings: As specified on Piping Data Sheet located at the end of this\n35 section as a supplement.\n36 Part 3 -Execution\n37 Installation of Schedule 80 Solvent Weld Pipe\n38 In accordance with Section 02500, RAW WATER CONVEYANCE PIPING -GENERAL.\nAppendix 4D.55\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Installation of C900 Bell And Spigot Pipe\n2 In accordance with AWWA C605.\n3 Joints:\n4 Rubber Gasketed: In accordance with manufacturer's written instructions.\n5 Restrained Joint Systems: In accordance with manufacturer's written instructions.\n6 Pipe Bending for Horizontal or Vertical Curves: Radius of curves shall not exceed 75 percent of\n7 manufacturer's recommended values.\n8 Use blocks or braces at pipe joints to ensure axial deflection in gasketed or mechanical joints does not\n9 exceed allowable deflection.\n10 Maximum Joint Deflection: 75 percent of manufacturer's recommended values.\n11 Construction Quality Control\n12 Cleaning\n13 Following assembly and testing, and prior to final acceptance, flush pipelines with water at 2.5 fps\n14 minimum flushing velocity until foreign matter is removed.\n15 If impractical to flush large diameter pipe at 2.5 fps, clean pipe by use of pipe pig as approved by\n16 Construction Manager. Multiple passes of pipe pig may be required to adequately clean line.\n17 Remove accumulated debris through blowoffs 2 inches and larger or by removing spools and valves\n18 from piping.\n19 Pipeline Hydrostatic Test:\n20 General:\n21 Notify Construction Manager in writing at least 5 days in advance of testing. Construction Manager\n22 will coordinate with other parties required to witness testing. Perform testing in presence of\n23 Construction Manager.\n24 Using water as test medium, all newly installed pipelines shall successfully pass hydrostatic leakage\n25 test prior to acceptance.\n26 Conduct field hydrostatic test on buried piping after trench has been completely backfilled. Testing\n27 may, as approved by Construction Manager, be done prior to placement of asphaltic concrete or\n28 roadway structural section.\n29 Construction General Contractor may, if field conditions permit and as approved by Construction\n30 Manager, partially backfill trench, and leave joints open for inspection and conduct initial service leak\n31 test. Final field hydrostatic test shall not, however, be conducted until backfilling has been completed\n32 as specified above.\n33 Install temporary thrust blocking or other restraint as necessary to prevent movement of pipe and\n34 protect adjacent piping or equipment. Make necessary taps in piping prior to testing.\n35 Wait a minimum of 5 days after concrete thrust blocking is installed to perform pressure tests. If\n36 high-early strength cement is used for thrust blocking, wait may be reduced to 2 days.\n37 Prior to test, remove or suitably isolate appurtenant instruments or devices that could be damaged by\n38 pressure testing.\n39 Procedure:\n40 Furnish testing equipment, as approved by Construction Manager, which provides observable and\n41 accurate measurements of leakage under specified conditions.\n42 Maximum Filling Velocity: 0.25 foot per second calculated based on full area of pipe.\nAppendix 4D.56\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Expel air from piping system during filling.\n2 Test Pressure: 173 psi as measured at low point of pipeline.\n3 Apply and maintain specified test pressure with hydraulic force pump. Valve off piping system when\n4 test pressure is reached.\n5 Maintain hydrostatic test pressure continuously for 2 hours minimum, adding make-up water only as\n6 necessary to restore test pressure.\n7 Determine actual leakage by measuring quantity of water necessary to maintain specified test pressure\n8 for duration of test.\n9 Identify method of disposing water after system testing.\n10 Maximum Allowable Leakage:\n11 L= ND(P)1/2\n7400\n12 where:\n13 L = Allowable leakage, in gallons per hour.\n14 N = Number of joints in tested line.\n15 D = Nominal diameter of pipe, in inches.\n16 P = Average test pressure during leakage test, in pounds per square inch.\n17 Supplements\n18 Supplement 1-Solvent Weld Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Pipe and Fittings.\n19 END OF SECTION 02509\n20\nAppendix 4D.57\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTable 1. Solvent Weld Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Pipe and Fittings\nItem Size Description\nPipe All Schedule 80 PVC: Type I, Grade I or Class 12454-B conforming to\nASTM D1784 and ASTM D1785. Pipe shall be manufactured with\n2 percent titanium dioxide for ultraviolet protection.\nThreaded Nipples: Schedule 80 PVC.\nFittings All Schedule to Match Pipe Above: ASTM D2466 and ASTM D2467 for\nsocket-weld type and Schedule 80 ASTM D2464 for threaded type. Fittings\nshall be manufactured with 2 percent titanium dioxide for ultraviolet\nprotection.\nJoints All Solvent socket-weld except where connection to threaded valves and\nequipment may require future disassembly.\nFlanges All One piece, molded hub type PVC flat face flange in accordance with\nFittings above, 125-pound ANSI B 16.1 drilling.\nBolting All ASTM Al93/A193M Type 316 stainless steel Grade B8M hex head bolts\nand ASTM A194/ Al94M Grade 8M hex head nuts.\nGaskets All Flat Face Mating Flange: Full faced 1/8-inch thick ethylene propylene\n(EPR) rubber.\nRaised Face Mating Flange: Flat ring 1/8-inch ethylene propylene (EPR)\nrubber, with filler gasket between OD of raised face and flange OD to\nprotect the flange from bolting moment.\nSolvent Cement All As recommended by the pipe and fitting manufacturer conforming to\nASTM D2564.\nThread Lubricant All Teflon tape\n2\nAppendix 4D.58\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 02631 -CATCH BASINS SCHED. B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 References\n4 The following is a list of standards that may be referenced in this section:\n5 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS\n6 (AASHTO)\n7 AASHTO M105 Standard Specification for Gray Iron Castings\n8 AASHTO M198 Standard Specification for Joints for Circular Concrete Sewer and Culvert\n9 Pipe Using Flexible Watertight Gaskets\n10 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n11 ASTM A536 Standard Specification for Ductile Iron Castings\n12 ASTM C387 Standard Specification for Packaged, Dry, Combined Materials for Mortar\n13 and Concrete\n14 ASTM C478 Standard Specification for Precast Reinforced Concrete Manhole Sections\n15 Part 2 -Products\n16 Precast Units\n17 Precast units shall conform to ASTM C478 except dimensions shall be as shown on the Drawings.\n18 The joints shall be the tongue-and-groove type or the shiplap type, sufficiently deep to prevent lateral\n19 displacement. Precast concrete units shall be furnished with knockouts or cutouts.\n20 Rubber gaskets for use in joints of precast catch basin sections shall conform to the applicable\n21 requirements of AASHTO M198. Rubber gasket material shall be stored in a clean, cool place,\n22 protected from sunlight and contaminants. They shall be protected from direct sunlight at all times\n23 except during actual installation.\n24 Concrete risers for extensions shall be a maximum of 6 inches high and of same quality as sections.\n25 Risers shall be reviewed by Engineer before installation.\n26 Mortar\n27 Standard premixed mortar conforming to ASTM C387, Type S, or proportion I part Portland cement\n28 to 2 parts clean, well-graded sand which will pass a 1/8-inch screen. Admixtures may be used not\n29 exceeding the following percentages of weight of cement: Hydrated lime, 10 percent; diatomaceous\n30 earth or other inert materials, 5 percent. Consistency of mortar shall be such that it will readily\n31 adhere to concrete.\n32 Rings And Covers\n33 Castings for catch basin rings shall be gray-iron conforming to the requirements of AASHTO MIO5,\n34 Grade 30B. Covers shall be ductile iron conforming to ASTM A536, Grade 80-55-06.\n35 Catch basin rings and covers shall meet the strength requirements of Federal Specification\n36 RR-F-621E. All mating surfaces shall be machine finished to ensure a nonrocking fit.\n37 The horizontal surface and inside vertical recess face of the ring, and the horizontal seating surface\n38 and vertical outside edge of the cover, shall be machine finished to the following tolerances:\n39 Ring: +3/32 inch to -3/32 inch.\n40 Cover: +3/32 inch to -3/32 inch.\nAppendix 4D.59\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 All catch basin rings and covers shall be identified by the name or symbol of the manufacturer and\n2 country of casting origin. This identification shall be in a plainly visible location when the ring and\n3 cover are installed. Ductile iron shall be identified by the following, \"DUC\" or \"DI\". The\n4 manufacturer's identification and material identification shall be adjacent to each other and shall be\n5 minimum 1/2-inch to maximum 1-inch high letters, recessed to be flush with the adjacent surfaces.\n6 Part 3 -Execution\n7 Excavation And Backfill\n8 The excavation for all catch basins shall be sufficient to leave 1 foot in the clear between their outer\n9 surfaces and the earth bank. Backfilling of catch basins shall be done in accordance with the\n10 provisions of Section 02320 TRENCH BACKFILL. Backfilling around the work will not be allowed\n11 until the concrete and mortar have thoroughly set. Any excavation safety systems shall meet the\n12 requirements of Section 02316, EXCAVATION.\n13 Placing Precast Units\n14 If material in bottom of trench is unsuitable for supporting unit, excavate and backfill to required\n15 grade with 3-inch minus, clean, pit-run material. Set units to grade at locations shown.\n16 Ladder rungs shall be grouted in the precast concrete walls. Rungs shall be uniformly spaced at\n17 12 inches and be vertically aligned.\n18 The ends of all pipes shall be trimmed flush with the inside walls.\n19 Rubber gaskets may be used in tongue-and-groove joints of precast units. All other joints and all\n20 openings cut through the walls shall be grouted and watertight.\n21 If gaskets are used, handling of the precast units after the gasket has been affixed shall be done\n22 carefully to avoid disturbing or damaging the gasket or contaminating it with foreign material. Care\n23 shall be exercised to attain proper alignment before the joints are entirely forced home. During\n24 insertion of the tongue or spigot, the units shall be partially supported to minimize unequal lateral\n25 pressure on the gasket and to maintain concentricity until the gasket is properly positioned.\n26 Catch basins shall be watertight.\n27 Extensions\n28 Install extensions to height determined by Engineer. Lay risers in mortar with sides plumb and tops\n29 to grade. Joints shall be sealed with mortar, with interior and exterior troweled smooth. Prevent\n30 mortar from drying out and cure by applying a curing compound. Extensions shall be watertight.\n31 Installation Of Rings And Covers\n32 Set rings and covers at elevations indicated or as determined in field and in conformance with\n33 Drawings.\n34 Rings may be cast in, or shall be set in mortar.\n35 The cover of a catch basin shall not be grouted to final grade until the final elevation of the adjacent\n36 ground surface has been established. Covers shall be seated properly to prevent rocking.\n37 Cleaning\n38 Upon completion, clean each structure of all silt, debris, and foreign matter.\n39 END OF SECTION 02631\nAppendix 4D.60\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI SECTION 02632 -STORMWATER PIPING SCHED. B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 References\n4 The following is a list of standards, which may be referenced in this section and any supplemental Data\n5 Sheets:\n6 AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS\n7 (AASHTO)\n8 AASHTO M294 Standard Specifications for Corrugated Polyethylene Pipe, 300- to 1200-mm\n9 Diameter\n10 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n11 ASTM F477 Standard Specification for Elastomeric Seals (Gaskets) for Joining Plastic\n12 Pipe\n13 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n14 Information/Record (IR): Catalog and manufacturer's data sheets for stormwater pipe and fittings.\n15 Part 2 -Products\n16 Pipe And Fittings\n17 Pipe and fittings for culverts and stormwater pipes shall be corrugated polyethylene (CPE) in accordance\n18 with the following:\nItem Description\nPipe AASHTO M294\nPipe Stiffness (Minimum) In accordance with specified AASHTO Specification\nProfile Type S\nJoints Bell and spigot, gasketed type and water-tight.\nGaskets ASTM F477\nFittings Manufacturer's standard; same stiffiess as adjacent pipe.\nSource Quality Control In accordance with specified AASHTO Specification.\nFactory Testing Pipe lengths used for deflection testing shall be destroyed after testing.\n19 Part 3 -Execution\n20 Installation Of Pipe, Fittings, And Appurtenances\n21 General:\n22 Pipe laying shall proceed upgrade with spigot ends pointing in direction of flow.\n23 Excavate bell holes at each joint to permit correct assembly and inspection of entire joint.\n24 Pipe invert may deviate from line or grade up to 1/2 inch for line and 1/4 inch for grade, provided that\n25 finished pipeline will present a uniform bore, and such variation does not result in a level or reverse\n26 sloping invert, or less than minimum slope shown.\n27 Pipe bedding shall form continuous and uniform bearing and support for pipe barrel between joints.\n28 Pipe shall not rest directly on bell or pipe joint.\n29 Prevent entry of foreign material into gasketed joints.\nAppendix 4D.61\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Plug or close off pipes that are stubbed off for manhole, concrete structure, or for connection by\n2 others, with temporary watertight plugs.\n3 Trench excavation and placement of pipe bedding and pipe zone materials shall be in accordance with\n4 Section 02320, TRENCH BACKFILL.\n5 Any excavation safety systems shall be in accordance with Section 02316, EXCAVATION.\n6 Pipe Cleaning:\n7 Prior to final acceptance and final inspection of the stormwater pipes by Construction Manager, flush\n8 and clean all stormwater pipes and catch basins. Remove all accumulated construction debris, rocks,\n9 gravel, sand, silt, and other foreign material. If necessary, use mechanical rodding or bucketing\n10 equipment.\n11 Upon Construction Manager's final inspection of the stormwater pipes, if any foreign matter is still\n12 present in the system, reflush and clean the sections and portions of the lines as required.\n13 END OF SECTION 02632\nAppendix 4D.62\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI SECTION 02661 -GEOMEMBRANES SCHED. B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 References\n4 The publications listed below form a part of this Specification to the extent referenced. The publications are\n5 referred to in the text by basic designation only.\n6 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n7 ASTM D638 Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics\n8 ASTM D1004 Standard Test Method for Initial Tear Resistance of Plastic Film and Sheeting\n9 ASTM D1238 Standard Test Method for Flow Rates of Thermoplastics by Extrusion\n10 Plastometer\n11 ASTM D1505 Standard Test Method for Density of Plastics by the Density-Gradient Technique\n12 ASTM D1603 Standard Test Method for Carbon Black in Olefin Plastics\n13 ASTM D4218 Determination of Carbon Black Content in Polyethylene Compounds by the\n14 Muffle-Furnace Technique\n15 ASTM D4833 Standard Test Method for Index Puncture Resistance of Geotextiles,\n16 Geomembranes, and Related Products\n17 ASTM D5199 Standard Test Method for Measuring the Nominal Thickness of Geosynthetics\n18 ASTM D5321 Standard Test Method for Determining the Coefficient of Soil and Geosynthetic\n19 or Geosynthetic and Geo synthetic Friction by the Direct Shear Method\n20 ASTM D5397 Evaluation of Stress Crack Resistance of Polyolefin Geomembrane Using\n21 Notched Constant Tension Load Test (Appendix A, Single Point)\n22 ASTM D5596 Microscopic Evaluation of the Dispersion of Carbon Black in Polyolefin\n23 Geosynthetics\n24 ASTM D5994 Standard Test Method for Measuring Core Thickness of Textured\n25 Geomembranes\n26 ASTM D6243 Standard Test Method for Determining the Internal and Interface Shear\n27 Resistance of Geosynthetic Clay Liner by the Direct Shear Method\n28 ASTM D6392 Standard Test Method for Determining the Integrity of Nonreinforced\n29 Geomembrane Seams Produced Using Thermo-Fusion Methods\n30 GEOSYNTHETIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE (GRI)\n31 GRI-GM12 Asperity Measurement of Textured Geomembranes Using a Depth Gage\n32 GRI-GM13 Test Properties, Testing Frequency and Recommended Warranty for High\n33 Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Smooth and Textured Geomembrane\n34 Description\n35 The work includes IDF manufacture, fabrication (if needed), supply, and installation of geomembrane for\n36 the lining system, and for other geomembrane applications, as shown on the Drawings. Geomembrane is\n37 also referred to as flexible membrane liner (FML).\nAppendix 4D.63\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Definitions\n2 CQA Certifying Engineer: Engineer providing independent oversight and responsible for implementing\n3 the CQA Plan. Independent is defined as an organization that operates separately from the Construction\n4 General Contractor, DOE-ORP, and the Tank Farm Contractor.\n5 Engineer: Design Engineer for the IDF, providing technical design support during construction.\n6 Construction Manager: Construction coordinator overseeing the IDF construction activities in the field\n7 and the Tank Farm Contractor's onsite technical representative.\n8 Construction General Contractor: Responsible for overall construction activities and operations,\n9 including Construction Subcontractors.\n10 Installer: Construction Subcontractor responsible for installation of geosynthetics (geomembrane, GCL,\n11 CDN, and geotextiles).\n12 LCRS: Leachate collection and removal system.\n13 LDS: Leak detection system.\n14 SLDS: Secondary Leak Detection System.\n15 Submittals-Approval Required\n16 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n17 Manufacturer's descriptive data, specification sheets, literature, and other data as necessary to fully\n18 demonstrate that those materials proposed for use comply with the requirements of these Specifications.\n19 Construction General Contractor shall submit required interface strength data as specified in\n20 PART 2-PRODUCTS prior to shipment of material to allow Engineer to evaluate if submitted material\n21 meets strength requirements for project design criteria. Allow Engineer 20 working days for this\n22 evaluation upon receipt of data.\n23 Installation Plan:\n24 The Construction General Contractor shall submit an installation plan describing the proposed\n25 methods for geomembrane deployment, panel layout, seaming, repair, and protection. The\n26 installation plan shall provide for no field seam locations within the LCRS sump trough under the\n27 leachate collection and riser pipes. Construction General Contractor shall orient panel layout such\n28 that one full panel width spans the LCRS sump trough. The plan shall also include a quality control\n29 program for the Construction General Contractor's activities related to geomembrane installation.\n30 Manufacturer's Quality Control (QC) test data for geomembrane composition and properties as\n31 specified in paragraph MANUFACTURING QUALITY CONTROL -POLYETHYLENE\n32 GEOMEMBRANES.\n33 Manufacturer's QC certification as specified herein.\n34 The Construction General Contractor shall submit Geomembrane Installer's organizational and\n35 seaming personnel qualifications, and other as required to provide the information described in these\n36 Specifications.\n37 The Construction General Contractor shall submit Geomembrane Installer's Certificate of Subgrade\n38 Acceptability to the CQA Certifying Engineer as specified herein.\n39 Calibration certification for construction quality control test equipment.\n40 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n41 Information/Record (IR):\n42 Documentation of test results from construction quality control testing.\nAppendix 4D.64\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Construction Quality Assurance (CQA)\n2 CQA Plan: A CQA Plan has been prepared as part of the landfill design. The CQA Plan discusses the\n3 testing procedures that will be followed by the CQA Certifying Engineer during installation of the\n4 geosynthetics (geotextile, CDN, geomembrane, GCL) and the documentation of the process. The CQA\n5 Plan is made part of these Specifications by reference. The Construction General Contractor shall\n6 conform to the requirements of the CQA Plan for all aspects of the geosynthetics, including submittals,\n7 supply, storage, installation, testing, documentation, covering, and protection.\n8 Quality assurance procedures are presented in the CQA Plan. The Construction General Contractor shall\n9 accommodate all quality assurance activities described in this section and in the CQA Plan for this\n10 project.\n11 Prior to placing any materials over the installed geomembrane, the Construction General Contractor shall\n12 allow time for acceptance of the Work as listed in the CQA Plan.\n13 CQA Conformance Testing\n14 Upon delivery of the rolls of geomembrane, the CQA Certifying Engineer will obtain samples at a\n15 frequency of one per production lot or one per 50,000 square feet of geomembrane, whichever results in\n16 greater number of tests. The CQA Certifying Engineer will test the samples to determine conformance to\n17 both the design specifications and the list of guaranteed properties.\n18 As a minimum, tests to determine the following characteristics will be performed on geomembranes:\n19 Thickness (ASTM D5994).\n20 Tensile characteristics (yield strength, elongation at yield; ASTM D638).\n21 Asperity (GM-12).\n22 Puncture resistance (ASTM D4833).\n23 Where optional procedures are noted in the test method, the requirements of these Specifications will\n24 prevail.\n25 Sampling Procedures:\n26 Samples will be taken across the entire width of the roll and will not include the first 3 feet. Unless\n27 otherwise specified, samples will be 3 feet long by the roll width. The CQA Certifying Engineer will\n28 mark the machine direction on the samples with an arrow.\n29 The CQA Certifying Engineer shall be allowed to remove samples for testing and other activities.\n30 Sample dimensions, procedures, and frequency shall be the same as those specified in the CQA Plan.\n31 The Construction General Contractor shall assist the CQA Certifying Engineer as necessary in all\n32 sampling and testing activities.\n33 Procedures for samples that fail conformance testing are outlined in the CQA Plan. The cost of\n34 additional conformance testing to demonstrate compliance of failed samples shall be borne by the\n35 Construction General Contractor.\n36 Warranty\n37 The geomembrane manufacturer(s) shall provide warranties on all geomembrane materials installed at\n38 the project site. The warranties shall be provided to the Construction General Contractor as purchaser\n39 with the Tank Farm Contractor named as beneficiary and shall be signed by an authorized\n40 representative of the geomembrane manufacturer. The terms of the warranties shall, at a minimum,\n41 include the provisions contained in the most recent version of GRI Test Method GM- 13.\nAppendix 4D.65\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Part 2 -Products\n2 General\n3 Type: High-density polyethylene (HDPE). Unreinforced, 60-mil nominal thickness, textured both sides.\n4 Manufacturer: The HDPE geomembrane manufacturer(s) shall have a minimum of 5 years of\n5 experience as a commercial manufacturer of HDPE geomembranes for landfill applications. Examples of\n6 potential manufacturers include: GSE Lining Technology, Inc., Houston, TX; and Poly-Flex, Inc., Grand\n7 Prairie, TX. Use of these examples is not intended to restrict potential manufacturers.\n8 Required Properties -Polyethylene Geomembranes\n9 Use of Recycled Polymer: The raw material shall be new polyethylene resin containing no more than\n10 two percent clean recycled polymer by weight. Two percent-recycled polymer shall not include any\n11 finished sheet material that has actually seen some type of service performance. Regrind, reworked, or\n12 trim materials in the form of chips or edge strips that have not actually seen some type of use may be\n13 added, if the material is from the same manufacturer and is the same formulation as the geomembrane\n14 being produced.\n15 Resin Properties: The resin shall meet the following Specifications:\n16 HDPE:\n17 Resin Specific Gravity (ASTM D1505): >0.932.\n18 Melt Index (ASTM D1238 Condition 190/2.16): <1.1 g/10 min.\n19 Finished Sheet Properties: The physical, mechanical, and environmental properties of the finished sheet\n20 shall meet or exceed the values specified in Table I contained in this part of the Specifications. Where\n21 applicable, values in Table I are Minimum Average Values.\n22 Required Interface Shear Strength Data:\n23 Provide data prior to material shipment for the interface friction angle between the textured\n24 geomembrane and other materials (including CDN, GCL, and Admix Liner) directly in contact with\n25 the geomembrane as specified in Article SUBMITTALS. Perform two interface shear strength tests\n26 on each interface under each set of normal loads.\n27 Friction angle shall be determined by direct shear testing under fully saturated conditions (ASTM\n28 D5321 or D6243 for GCL interface) at both low normal loads of 100, 250, and 500 pounds per square\n29 foot (psf), and high normal loads of 2,000, 8,000, and 15,000 psf. Report results for both peak and\n30 large displacement (minimum 2 inches) strength.\n31 The Engineer will review this data for conformance with project strength requirements. Construction\n32 General Contractor shall not order material for shipment until approved by Engineer. Any product or\n33 material changes required as a result of inadequate strength data will be addressed by Change Order\n34 provided submitted material meet all other requirements of this section.\n35 Manufacturing Quality Control -Polyethylene Geomembranes\n36 Quality Control Testing: Quality control testing shall be carried out by the manufacturer to demonstrate\n37 that the geomembrane meets the Specifications in this section. Additional testing may be carried out for\n38 purposes of determining conformance by the CQA CertifyingEngineer. If the results of the\n39 manufacturer's and the CQA Certifying Engineer's testing differ significantly, the testing shall be\n40 repeated by the CQA Certifying Engineer, and the manufacturer shall be allowed to monitor this testing.\n41 The results of this latter series of tests will prevail, provided that the applicable test methods have been\n42 followed.\n43 Required Information: Prior to the delivery of any geomembrane material, the manufacturer shall\n44 submit the following information:\nAppendix 4D.66\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The origin (resin supplier's name, resin production plant), identification (brand name, number), and\n2 production date of the resin.\n3 A list of quantities and descriptions of materials other than the base polymer, which comprise the\n4 geomembrane.\n5 Copies of the quality control certificates issued by the resin supplier.\n6 Reports on the tests conducted by the manufacturer to confirm that the quality of the resin used to\n7 manufacture the geomembrane satisfy these Specifications.\n8 A statement that recycled polymer (if any) is clean and does not exceed 2 percent by weight.\n9 A properties sheet including, at a minimum, all specified properties, measured using test methods\n10 indicated in these Specifications, or equivalent.\n11 Reports on the tests, including sampling procedures, conducted by the manufacturer to confirm that\n12 the geomembrane meets the Specifications.\n13 A certification that property values given in the properties sheet are guaranteed by the geomembrane\n14 manufacturer.\n15 QC Certification: Prior to shipment, the geomembrane manufacturer shall provide a quality control\n16 certificate for each roll of geomembrane. The quality control certificate shall be signed by a responsible\n17 party employed by the geomembrane manufacturer, such as the production manager. The quality control\n18 certificate shall include:\n19 Roll numbers and identification, resin lot, and batch numbers.\n20 Sampling procedures and results of quality control tests. As a minimum, results shall be given for\n21 thickness, asperity, tensile strength, and tear resistance in accordance with methods indicated in these\n22 Specifications. Tests shall be conducted on each production lot of geomembrane or every\n23 50,000 square feet, whichever results in the greater number of tests.\n24 Manufacturing Plant Visit: The manufacturer shall allow the CQA Certifying Engineer or his\n25 designated representative to visit the manufacturing plant, if the CQA Certifying Engineer so chooses. If\n26 possible, the visit shall be prior to or during the manufacturing of the geomembrane rolls for the specific\n27 project. The CQA Certifying Engineer or his designated representative shall review the manufacturing\n28 process, quality control, laboratory facilities, and testing procedures. During the visit, visiting personnel\n29 will also:\n30 Confirm that the measurements of properties by the manufacturer are properly documented and test\n31 methods used are acceptable.\n32 Spot inspect the rolls and confirm that they are free of holes, blisters, or any sign of contamination by\n33 foreign matter.\n34 Review packaging and transportation procedures to confirm that these procedures are not damaging\n35 the geomembrane.\n36 Confirm that roll packages have a label indicating the name of the manufacturer, type of\n37 geomembrane, thickness, and roll number.\n38 If applicable, confirm that extrusion rods and/or beads are derived from the same base resin type as the\n39 geomembrane.\n40 The geomembrane manufacturer shall accommodate these activities.\n41 Extrudate\n42 Extrudate for Fusion Welding of HDPE Geomembrane: Formulated from same HDPE resin as\n43 geomembrane and shall meet applicable physical property requirements.\nAppendix 4D.67\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Field-Fabricated Boots\n2 Pipes and other structures penetrating the lining system shall be sealed to the geomembrane with\n3 fabricated boots made of the same material and workmanship as the lining system geomembrane.\n4 The flange portion of each boot shall match the angle of the slope or bottom, be sealed to the\n5 geomembrane, and fit smoothly without folds or stretching of the material.\n6 Sealant Caulking\n7 Where shown on the Drawings, the caulking used shall be a one-component sealant formulated of\n8 butyl rubber and other selected ingredients, equivalent to Biddle Co., St. Louis, MO, Butylgrip\n9 Sealant, or as recommended by the manufacturer of the geomembrane materials.\n10 Stainless Steel Clamps\n11 As indicated on the Drawings, clamps shall be used to secure the HDPE geomembrane to pipes,\n12 poles, or risers that are intended to protrude through the cover. One-half-inch wide clamps shall meet\n13 or exceed specifications for \"Make-a-Clamp\" as manufactured by Breeze Clamp Products Division,\n14 Federal Laboratory, Inc., Saltsburg, PA.\n15 Butyl Mastic Tape\n16 Shall be as manufactured by Tremco, Cleveland, OH; or of a type recommended by HDPE\n17 geomembrane manufacturer.\n18 Neoprene Rubber Pad\n19 As indicated on the Drawings, neoprene rubber shall be used as compression strip beneath the\n20 stainless steel clamps (ASTM D2240). One-half-inch thick neoprene rubber shall be 35-to\n21 40 durometer hardness, as supplied by Aero Rubber Co., Inc., Bridgeview, IL, or approved equal.\n22 Cut to a continuous 2-inch wide piece of neoprene to form the gasket. Neoprene rubber contact\n23 cement recommended by the supplier shall be used to bond butt ends of joined strips and to bond\n24 neoprene rubber in position on surface. Butt joints in neoprene strips shall be offset from adjacent\n25 joints by at least 6 inches.\n26 Tensiometer For Field Testing\n27 Motor driven with jaws capable of traveling at measured rate of 2 inches per minute. Equipped with\n28 gauge, which measures force in unit pounds exerted between jaws.\n29 Plywood Sheeting\n30 Use APA rated sheeting EXT for protection of the HDPE geomembrane at termination edges on south\n31 side of Phase I.\n32 Part 3 -Execution\n33 General:\n34 Personnel Qualifications -Polyethylene Geomembranes:\n35 Installer Organization: At a minimum, the Construction General Contractor organization shall have\n36 successfully completed at least five projects consisting of installation of at least 5,000,000 square feet (total) of\n37 HDPE liner. Projects shall include RCRA landfills.\n38 Seaming Personnel: All personnel performing seaming operations shall be qualified by experience or by\n39 successfully passing seaming tests similar to those described in this section. The superintendent and lead\n40 welder foreman shall have experience seaming a minimum of 1,000,000 square feet of polyethylene\n41 geomembrane using the same type of seaming apparatus proposed for use on this project. These\n42 individuals shall provide direct supervision over less experienced seamers.\nAppendix 4D.68\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI No field seaming shall take place without one of these individuals being present. Key personnel are\n2 defined as the superintendent, foreman, and lead welder. Key personnel shall be full time employees of\n3 the Geosynthetics Installer.\n4 Applicability: The primary and secondary geomembranes shall be installed at the locations, lines, and\n5 grades shown on the Drawings. All geomembranes shall be installed in accordance with these\n6 Specifications and the CQA Plan.\n7 Installation Plan: Prior to beginning geomembrane installation, the Construction General Contractor\n8 shall submit a plan describing the proposed size, number, position, and sequence of geomembrane panel\n9 placement, and location of field seams.\n10 Subqrade Surface Preparation -Polyethylene Geomembranes\n11 The Construction General Contractor shall be responsible for preparing the subgrade surface of the\n12 soil bentonite liner for the geomembrane. Prepare the underlying soil surface as specified in\n13 Section 02319, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, and as approved by the Geomembrane Installer.\n14 The Geomembrane Installer shall certify in writing that the surface on which the geomembrane will\n15 be installed is acceptable. The certificate of acceptance shall be given by the Installer to the\n16 Construction General Contractor prior to commencement of geomembrane installation in the area\n17 under consideration. The CQA Certifying Engineer shall be given a copy of this certificate by the\n18 Construction General Contractor. The form for Geomembrane Installer certification is provided as\n19 Supplement to this Specification. Submittal of this form only applies to soil surfaces underlying the\n20 geomembrane. In this case Geomembrane Installer Certification of Subsurface Acceptability is only\n21 required for the surface on which the secondary and SLDS geomembrane shall be installed.\n22 After the subgrade surface has been accepted by the Installer, it shall be the Installer's responsibility\n23 to indicate to the Construction General Contractor any change in the subgrade surface condition that\n24 may require repair work.\n25 Special care shall be taken to avoid desiccation cracking or freezing of the admix liner.\n26 Specifications for allowable desiccation cracking of soil liner and repair measures are contained in\n27 Section 02666, ADMIX LINER. The surface of the admix liner shall be maintained in the required\n28 condition throughout the course of geomembrane installation.\n29 Anchor Trench Excavation and Backfillinq\n30 The anchor trench shall be excavated to the lines and widths shown on the design Drawings, prior to\n31 geomembrane placement. The comers of the trench shall be rounded so as to avoid sharp bends in the\n32 geomembrane. No loose soil shall be allowed to underlie the geomembrane in the anchor trench.\n33 Backfill with material as shown on the Drawings and compact as specified in Section 02320, TRENCH\n34 BACKFILL.\n35 Geomembrane Placement -Polyethylene Geomembranes\n36 Field Panel Identification: A field panel is the unit area of geomembrane, which is to be seamed in the\n37 field. Two cases are defined:\n38 If the geomembrane is fabricated into panels in a factory, a field panel is a factory panel or a portion\n39 of factory panel cut in the field.\n40 If the geomembrane is not fabricated into factory panels, a field panel is a roll or a portion of roll cut\n41 in the field.\n42 It will be the responsibility of the CQA Certifying Engineer to assign each field panel an\n43 \"identification code\" (number or letter-number) consistent with the layout plan. This identification\n44 code shall be agreed upon by the Construction Manager, Installer, and CQA Certifying Engineer.\nAppendix 4D.69\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 This field panel identification code shall be as simple and logical as possible. (Note that roll numbers\n2 assigned in the manufacturing plant are usually cumbersome and are not related to location in the\n3 field.)\n4 The CQA Certifying Engineer will establish a table or chart showing correspondence between roll\n5 numbers, factory panels, and field panel identification codes. The field panel identification code shall\n6 be used for all quality assurance records, including Installer's quality control (QC) testing.\n7 Field Panel Placement:\n8 Location: Field panels shall be installed at the locations indicated in the Installer's layout plan, as\n9 approved or modified.\n10 Installation Schedule: In general seaming of geomembrane will be performed the same day as\n11 deployment. However, at the discretion of Geosynthetic Installer, seaming may be carried over to the\n12 following workday.\n13 Placement Conditions:\n14 Geomembrane placement shall not proceed at an ambient temperature below 32 degrees F or above\n15 104 degrees F as measured 6 inches above the geomembrane surface unless installation procedures\n16 approved by the CQA Certifying Engineer are in place to address environmental conditions.\n17 Geomembrane placement shall not be done during any precipitation, in the presence of excessive\n18 moisture (e.g., fog, dew), in an area of ponded water, or in the presence of excessive winds.\n19 Placement methods shall prevent damage to underlying soil liner or geosynthetic materials.\n20 Factors such as expansion, contraction, overlap at seams, anchorage requirements, seaming progress,\n21 and drainage shall be considered. Textured-surface sheets shall be aligned in a manner, which\n22 maximizes theii frictional capabilities along the slope. Maneuver sheets of geomembrane into place\n23 in a manner, which prevents wrinkles, folds, or similar distress, which can damage the geomembrane\n24 or prevent its satisfactory alignment or seaming. A smooth-surface HDPE geomembrane rub sheet\n25 shall be used when placing textured HDPE geomembrane over underlying GCL. The rub sheet shall\n26 be maintained in good condition without tears, rough edges, holes, or scuff marks that can catch,\n27 displace, or otherwise disturb the underlying GCL, or the overlying geomembrane.\n28 Damage: Damaged panels or portions of damaged panels, which have been rejected, shall be removed\n29 from the work area. Any repairs shall be made according to procedures described in this Part of the\n30 Specifications.\n31 Exposed Geomembrane Protection: After panel deployment, all geomembrane, except those shown as\n32 permanently exposed on the Drawings, shall be covered to within a maximum period of 20 working days\n33 to minimize exposure to temperature cycles that cause expansion/contraction of the geomembrane and\n34 desiccation of the underlying admix liner. Exposure in excess of 15 days, Construction General\n35 Contractor will peel back leading panel of geomembrane on a routine basis (established by the CQA\n36 inspector) for CQA to inspect for desiccation of admix liner. Any observed desiccation observed outside\n37 of specification tolerance will be repaired and the geomembrane covered immediately. Additional\n38 exposure areas may be required by CQA to verify complete repair areas required. Geomembrane panels\n39 shall be covered by other geosynthetic components of the lining system or overlying soil cover materials\n40 as shown on the Drawings.\n41 Field Seaming -Polyethylene Geomembranes\n42 Seaming Equipment and Products: Approved processes for field seaming are extrusion welding and\n43 fusion welding, except that use of extrusion welding shall be limited to areas (such as sumps or repairs)\n44 where fusion welding cannot be employed. Proposed alternate processes shall be documented and\n45 submitted by the Installer to the Construction Manager and CQA Certifying Engineer for approval. Only\n46 equipment, which has been specifically approved by make and model, shall be used.\nAppendix 4D.70\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Extrusion Process:\n2 The extrusion-welding machine shall be equipped with gages capable of measuring the temperature at\n3 the nozzle or the preheat temperature.\n4 The Installer shall provide documentation regarding the extrudate and shall certify that the extrudate\n5 is compatible with these Specifications and is comprised of the same resin type as the geomembrane\n6 sheeting.\n7 The Installer shall comply with the following:\n8 The Installer shall maintain on-site a sufficient number of spare operable seaming machines (at least\n9 one at all times) to ensure continuous operation.\n10 The equipment used for seaming shall not be likely to damage the geomembrane.\n11 The extruder shall be purged prior to beginning a seam until all heat-degraded extrudate has been\n12 removed from the barrel.\n13 The electric generator shall be placed on a smooth base such that no damage occurs to the\n14 geomembrane.\n15 Grinding shall be completed no more than 1 hour prior to seaming.\n16 A smooth insulating plate or fabric shall be placed beneath the hot welding machine after usage.\n17 The geomembrane shall be protected from damage in heavily trafficked areas.\n18 Fusion Process: The fusion-welding machines shall be automated vehicular-mounted devices. The\n19 fusion-welding machines shall be equipped with gages giving the pertinent temperatures.\n20 The Installer shall comply with the following:\n21 The Installer shall maintain on site a sufficient number of spare operable seaming machines (at least\n22 one at all times) to ensure continuous operations.\n23 The equipment used for seaming shall not be likely to damage the geomembrane.\n24 The electric generator shall be placed on a smooth base such that no damage occurs to the\n25 geomembrane.\n26 A smooth insulating plate or fabric shall be placed beneath the hot welding machine after usage.\n27 The geomembrane shall be protected from damage in heavily trafficked areas.\n28 If a build-up of moisture is observed prior to seaming a movable protective layer shall be used directly\n29 below each overlap of geomembrane to be seamed to prevent buildup of moisture between the sheets.\n30 Seam Layout: In general, seams shall be oriented parallel to the line of maximum slope, i.e., oriented up\n31 and down, not across, the slope to the maximum extent practical. In comers and odd-shaped geometric\n32 locations, the number of seams shall be minimized. No seams shall be permitted within the LCRS sump\n33 trough for leachate collection and riser pipes. One full panel width shall span the LCRS sump trough.\n34 On the landfill floor:\n35 No horizontal seam shall be less than 5 feet from the toe of the slope, or other area of potential stress\n36 concentrations.\n37 Over the LCRS, LDS, and SLDS sump areas in each cell, no horizontal seam shall be placed less than\n38 150 feet from the toe of the north slope for a distance of at least 100 feet in each direction from the\n39 LCRS and LDS sump centerline.\n40 Seams shall be aligned to produce the fewest possible number of wrinkles and \"fishmouths\".\n41 A seam numbering system consistent with the panel numbering system shall be utilized.\nAppendix 4D.71\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Weather Conditions for Seaming: The allowable weather conditions for seaming are as follows:\n2 Unless authorized in writing by the Construction Manager, no seaming shall be attempted at ambient\n3 temperatures below 32 degrees F or above 104 degrees F as measured 6 inches above the\n4 geomembrane surface.\n5 The geomembrane shall be dry, protected from wind, and free of dust.\n6 If the Installer wishes to use methods, which may allow seaming at ambient temperatures below\n7 32 degrees F, the Installer shall certify in writing that the quality of the seams welded at these\n8 temperatures is the same as the quality of seams welded at temperatures above 32 degrees F. In\n9 addition, if the Installer wishes to seam at ambient temperatures below 32 degrees F, the following\n10 conditions shall be satisfied in addition to the general seaming procedures:\n11 For extrusion welding, preheating shall be performed. Preheating may be waived by the Construction\n12 Manager if it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the CQA Certifying Engineer that welds of\n13 equivalent quality may be obtained without preheating at the expected temperature of installation.\n14 Sheet grinding, if required, may be performed before preheating.\n15 Observe all areas of the geomembrane that have been preheated to determine that they have not been\n16 subjected to excessive melting.\n17 Confirm that geomembrane surface temperatures have not decreased below the minimum specified\n18 for welding, due to wind or other adverse conditions. Wind protection for the seam area may be\n19 required.\n20 Trial seams, as described in paragraph Trial Seams of this section, shall be made in the immediate\n21 area where seaming will occur, under the same ambient temperature and preheating conditions as the\n22 actual seams. New trial seams shall be made if the ambient temperature decreases by more than\n23 5 degrees F from the previous trial seam conditions. Such new trial seams shall be conducted as soon\n24 as seams in progress during the temperature drop have been completed.\n25 Additional destructive seam tests, as described in paragraph Destructive Seam Strength Testing of\n26 this section, shall be performed at intervals of 250 to 500 feet of seam length at the CQA Certifying\n27 Engineer's discretion.\n28 The Installer shall provide sample coupons cut from each end of the seam.\n29 Seam Preparation:\n30 Cleaning: Prior to seaming, the seam area shall be clean and free of moisture, dust, dirt, debris of any\n31 kind, and foreign material. Special attention shall be paid to cleaning the existing geomembrane at tie-in\n32 locations.\n33 Overlap: Cross slope, seams on both the trench floor and sideslopes shall be overlapped so that liquids\n34 are not trapped, i.e., seams shall be shingled downslope. If seam overlap grinding is required, the process\n35 shall be completed according to the geomembrane manufacturer's instructions within I hour of the\n36 seaming operation, and in a way, that does not damage the geomembrane. Panels of geomembrane shall\n37 have a finished overlap of a minimum of 3 inches for extrusion welding and 5 inches for fusion welding.\n38 Use of Solvents: No solvent or adhesive shall be used.\n39 Temporary Bonding: The procedure used to temporarily bond adjacent panels together shall not\n40 damage the geomembrane; in particular, the temperature of hot air at the nozzle of any spot welding\n41 apparatus shall be controlled such that the geomembrane is not damaged.\n42 General Seaming Procedure: The general seaming procedure used by the Installer shall be as follows:\n43 Seaming shall extend to the outside edge of panels to be placed in the anchor trench.\n44 If required, a firm substrate shall be provided by using a flat board, a conveyor belt, or similar hard\n45 surface directly under the seam overlap to achieve proper support.\nAppendix 4D.72\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI If seaming operations are carried out at night, adequate illumination shall be provided.\n2 \"Fishmouths\" or wrinkles at the seam overlaps shall be cut along the ridge of the wrinkle in order to\n3 achieve a flat overlap. The cut \"fishmouths\" or wrinkles shall be seamed, and any portion where the\n4 overlap is inadequate shall then be patched with an oval or round patch of the same geomembrane\n5 extending a minimum of 6 inches beyond the cut in all directions.\n6 Construction Quality Control Testing -Polyethylene Geomembranes\n7 General: Testing requirements specified herein are intended for the Construction General Contractor\n8 (and Geomembrane Installer) during geomembrane installation. Testing requirements for the CQA\n9 Certifying Engineer are provided in the CQA Plan.\n10 Trial Seams:\n11 Trial seams shall be made on fragment pieces of geomembrane liner to verify that seaming conditions\n12 are adequate. A trial seam shall be made prior to each seaming period (maximum of 6 hours) for each\n13 seaming machine used that day. Also, each seamer shall make at least one trial seam each day. Trial\n14 seams shall be made under the same conditions as actual seams.\n15 The trial seam sample shall be at least 2 feet long by 1 foot wide (after seaming) with the seam\n16 centered lengthwise. Seam overlap shall be as indicated in this Part.\n17 Test three specimens for peel and two specimens for shear. Each specimen shall be at least 1 inch\n18 wide and shall be cut from the trial seam sample by the Installer. The specimens shall be tested\n19 respectively in shear and peel using a field tensiometer, and they shall not fail in the seam. All trial\n20 seam specimens must meet the minimum requirements of Table 2, Required Seam Properties, for trial\n21 seam acceptance. If a specimen fails, the entire operation shall be repeated. If the additional\n22 specimen fails, the seaming apparatus and seamer shall not be accepted and shall not be used for\n23 seaming until the deficiencies are corrected and two consecutive successful full trial seams are\n24 achieved.\n25 All test equipment shall be in calibration and conform to manufacturer's specifications. The Installer\n26 shall provide the Construction Manager and CQA Certifying Engineer with current calibration\n27 certificates.\n28 Nondestructive Seam Continuity Testing:\n29 General:\n30 The Installer shall nondestructively test all field seams over their full length using a vacuum test unit,\n31 air pressure test (for double fusion seams only), or other approved method (i.e., spark test). Vacuum\n32 testing and air pressure testing are described below. The purpose of the nondestructive test is to\n33 check the continuity of seams. It does not provide any information on seam strength. Continuity\n34 testing shall be done as the seaming work progresses. Nondestructive testing will not be permitted\n35 before sunrise or after sunset unless the Construction General Contractor demonstrates to the CQA\n36 Certifying Engineer their capability to perform testing under reduced light conditions. Any seams,\n37 which fail nondestructive testing, shall be repaired in accordance with these Specifications. Seams,\n38 which cannot be nondestructively tested because of seam geometry, shall be double welded or\n39 capped.\n40 All test equipment shall be in calibration and conform to manufacturer's specifications. The Installer\n41 shall submit current calibration certificates.\n42 Vacuum Testing: The equipment shall be comprised of the following:\n43 A vacuum box assembly consisting of a rigid housing, a transparent viewing window, a soft neoprene\n44 gasket attached to the bottom, port hole or valve assembly, and a vacuum gage.\n45 A steel vacuum tank and pump assembly equipped with a pressure controller and connections.\n46 A rubber pressure/vacuum hose with fittings and connections.\nAppendix 4D.73\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 A bucket and wide paint brush.\n2 A soapy solution.\n3 The following procedures shall be used:\n4 Energize the vacuum pump and reduce the tank pressure to a minimum of 5 inches of mercury.\n5 Wet a strip of geomembrane approximately 12 inches wide by 48 inches long with the soapy solution.\n6 Place the vacuum box over the test area.\n7 Close the bleed valve and open the vacuum valve.\n8 Ensure that a leak tight seal is created.\n9 For a period of not less than 10 seconds, examine the geomembrane through the viewing window for\n10 the presence of soap bubbles.\n11 If no bubbles appear coming from the seam after 10 seconds, close the vacuum valve and open the\n12 bleed valve, move the box over the next adjoining area with a minimum 3-inch overlap, and repeat\n13 the process.\n14 All areas where soap bubbles appear shall be marked and repaired in accordance with this Part.\n15 Air Pressure Testing: The following procedures are applicable only to those processes, which produce a\n16 double seam with an enclosed air channel. All double seams with an enclosed air channel shall be air\n17 pressure tested. The equipment shall be comprised of the following:\n18 An air pump (manual or motor driven) capable of generating and sustaining a pressure of 60 to 65 psi.\n19 A rubber hose with fittings and connections.\n20 A sharp hollow needle, or other approved pressure feed device.\n21 A calibrated pressure gage capable of reading pressures up to 65 psi.\n22 The following procedures shall be used:\n23 Seal both ends of the seam to be tested.\n24 Insert needle with pressure gage, or other approved pressure feed device, into the air channel created\n25 by the fusion weld.\n26 Energize the air pump and pressurize the channel to a minimum 25 psi for a 1/2-inch wide channel, or\n27 55 psi for a 1-inch wide channel. Close the valve and sustain the pressure for a minimum of\n28 5 minutes.\n29 If loss of pressure exceeds 2 psi, or does not stabilize, locate faulty area and repair in accordance with\n30 this section. If significant changes in geomembrane temperature occur during the test (e.g., due to\n31 cloud cover), the test shall be repeated after the geomembrane temperature has stabilized.\n32 Cut end of seam opposite to the pressure gage and observe that the pressure drops. If the pressure\n33 does not drop, locate the obstruction(s) in the seam, repair, and retest seam.\n34 Remove needle or other approved pressure feed device and repair seam.\n35 Destructive Seam Strength Testing:\n36 General:\n37 Destructive seam tests shall be performed at selected locations. The purpose of these tests is to\n38 evaluate seam strength. Seam strength testing shall be done as the seaming work progresses. The\n39 samples shall meet the requirements of Table 2, Required Seam Properties.\n40 All test equipment shall be in calibration and conform to manufacturer's specifications. The Installer\n41 shall submit current calibration certificates.\n42 Each sample shall be tested for bonded seam shear and peel strength by an independent testing\n43 laboratory.\nAppendix 4D.74\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Test at least five specimens for each seam test method (shear and peel). Four out of five specimens\n2 must meet the minimum requirements of Table 2, Required Seam Properties, for field seam\n3 acceptance.\n4 Location and Frequency:\n5 Destructive seam samples shall be obtained from actual fabricated field seams as work progresses, not\n6 at the completion of field seaming. The CQA Certifying Engineer will select locations where seam\n7 samples will be removed.\n8 Sampling frequency shall be a minimum of one sample per 500 feet of seam length per welding\n9 machine (this minimum frequency shall be determined as an average taken from all the panels,\n10 including welds for caps), or a minimum of two samples per factory panel, whichever gives the\n11 largest number of samples. If agreed by all parties (Construction General Contractor, Construction\n12 Manager, and the CQA Certifying Engineer) the frequency of destructive seam testing may be\n13 reduced to one sample per 1,000 feet of seam if test results and other nondestructive seam tests appear\n14 adequate for assuring seam quality. If, based on the specified test frequency, a destructive test\n15 location should fall within the LCRS or LDS sump area (as shown on the Drawings); the distance\n16 between destructive tests shall be reduced to relocate the destructive test location outside the sump\n17 area.\n18 Sampling Procedures:\n19 Samples shall be cut by the Installer as the seaming progresses in order to provide laboratory test\n20 results before completion of installation. The CQA Certifying Engineer shall assign a number to each\n21 sample, mark it accordingly, and record the sample location on the layout drawing.\n22 All holes in the geomembrane resulting from destructive seam sampling shall be immediately\n23 repaired in accordance with repair procedures. The continuity of the new seams in the repaired area\n24 shall be tested as described in this Part.\n25 Sample Size: The samples shall be minimum 12 inches wide by minimum 42 inches long with the seam\n26 centered lengthwise. One 1-inch wide strip shall be cut from each end of the samples, and these shall be\n27 tested in the field as described below. The remaining sample shall be distributed as follows:\n28 One portion (minimum 12 inches by 12 inches) to the Installer for laboratory testing at his discretion.\n29 One portion (minimum 12 inches by 12 inches) to the Construction Manager for archive storage.\n30 One portion (minimum 12 inches by 18 inches) to the CQA Certifying Engineer for laboratory\n31 testing.\n32 Field Testing:\n33 The two 1-inch wide strips described above shall be tested in the field by tensiometer for peel and\n34 shear and shall not fail in the seam. If any test sample fails to pass, then the procedures outlined\n35 below (Procedures for Areas Failing Destructive Tests) shall be followed.\n36 The CQA Certifying Engineer will mark all samples and portions with its number. The CQA\n37 Certifying Engineer will also record the date and time, ambient temperature, number of seaming unit,\n38 name of seamer, welding apparatus temperatures and pressures, and pass or fail descriptions, and\n39 attach a copy to each sample portion.\n40 Procedures for Areas Failing Destructive Tests: The following procedures shall apply whenever a\n41 sample fails a destructive test, whether that test is conducted by the independent testing laboratory, the\n42 Installer's laboratory, or by field tensiometer. The Installer has two options:\n43 The Installer shall cap the seam between any two passing test locations, or\n44 The Installer shall trace the seam to two intermediate locations 10 feet minimum from the point of the\n45 failed test in each direction and take a small sample for an additional field test at each location. If\n46 these additional samples pass the test, then full samples shall be taken for laboratory testing.\nAppendix 4D.75\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 If these laboratory samples pass the tests, then the seam shall be capped between these locations. If\n2 either sample fails, then the sampling and testing process shall be repeated to establish the zone over\n3 which the seam shall be capped.\n4 All acceptable capped seams shall be bounded by two locations from which samples passing CQA\n5 laboratory destructive tests have been taken. In cases where the length of the capped seam exceeds\n6 150 feet, a sample of the capping seam shall be taken and shall pass destructive testing as described in this\n7 Part.\n8 Repairs -Polyethylene Geomembranes\n9 General:\n10 Any portion of the geomembrane exhibiting a flaw or failing a destructive or nondestructive test shall\n11 be repaired. All repairs shall be conducted in accordance with this Part. All repairs shall be subjected\n12 to the nondestructive seam testing procedures described in this Part.\n13 Each patch or other type of repair will be numbered and recorded.\n14 Repair Procedures:\n15 Patching, used to repair large holes, tears, undispersed raw materials, and contamination by foreign\n16 matter.\n17 Grinding and rewelding, used to repair small sections (typically with a maximum length of no more\n18 than several inches) of extruded seams.\n19 Spot welding or seaming used to repair pinholes.\n20 Capping, used to repair large lengths of failed seams or areas where large wrinkles or fish mouths\n21 have been cut to flatten the geomembrane sheet.\n22 Topping, used to repair areas of inadequate seams, which have an exposed edge. Topping shall be\n23 limited to an aggregate length of no more than 3 m (10 feet) on any given seam.\n24 Removing bad seam and replacing with a strip of new material welded into place, used with large\n25 lengths of fusion seams.\n26 For all repair methods, the following provisions shall be satisfied as applicable:\n27 Surfaces of the geomembrane, which are to be repaired, shall be abraded no more than one hour prior\n28 to the repair.\n29 All surfaces shall be clean and dry at the time of the repair.\n30 Patches or caps shall extend at least 6 inches beyond the edge of the defect, and all corners of patches\n31 shall be rounded with a radius of at least 3 inches.\n32 The geomembrane below large caps shall be appropriately cut to avoid water or gas collection\n33 between the two sheets.\n34 Verification of Repairs: Each repair shall be numbered and recorded. Each repair shall be\n35 nondestructively tested using the methods described in this Part. Large caps may be of sufficient extent to\n36 require destructive test sampling. Repairs that fail nondestructive or destructive tests shall be redone and\n37 retested until a passing test is obtained.\n38 Protection Of Termination Edges\n39 Along the south termination of the geomembrane, and along any termination edges of the membrane that\n40 may be exposed or buried for extended periods of time prior to their joining to adjacent subsequent\n41 sections, the Construction General Contractor shall protect leading edges with protective (sacrificial)\n42 layers of cushion geotextile and plywood sheet as shown on the Drawings.\nAppendix 4D.76\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Materials In Contact With Geomembrane\n2 The requirements of this Part are intended only to assure that the installation of other materials does not\n3 damage the geomembrane. Additional requirements as established in other sections of these\n4 Specifications are necessary to assure that systems built with these other materials are constructed in such\n5 a way as to provide proper performance. Material requirements for operations layer and drain gravel are\n6 specified in Section 02315, FILL AND BACKFILL.\n7 Requirements of this Part apply to geomembranes that are directly in contact with overlying soil or are\n8 covered with a layer of geotextile or geocomposite.\n9 Do not place granular materials in manner that will cause wrinkles to fold over or become confined to\n10 form a vertical ridge. Maximum wrinkle height shall be 4 inches and spacing between wrinkles shall be\n11 greater than 10 feet prior to placement of granular materials over the geomembrane.\n12 Minimum Thickness: Equipment used for spreading granular material shall not be driven directly on the\n13 geomembrane. A minimum thickness of 1 foot of granular material shall be maintained between\n14 spreading equipment and the geomembrane. A minimum thickness of 3 feet of granular material shall be\n15 maintained between rubber-tired hauling vehicles and the geomembrane. Construction haul vehicles shall\n16 have a maximum ground contact pressure of 25 psi.\n17 Spreading Equipment: Equipment used for spreading granular material shall be a light low ground\n18 pressure dozer (such as a wide-pad Caterpillar D6M LGP or lighter), low ground pressure excavator\n19 (Bucyrus-Erie 325H with 0.91-m [36-in] wide treads or lighter), or approved equal, with a maximum\n20 ground contact pressure of 5 psi.\n21 Spreading Operations:\n22 Spreading equipment operating on soil materials shall not spin their tracks, make sharp turns, or make\n23 sharp, rapid starts or stops. Soil materials shall be pushed carefully from previously placed material\n24 and not dumped directly onto geosynthetics except for the drain gravel in the LDS sump and\n25 operations layer material in SLDS sump. This material shall be carefully dumped onto the cushion\n26 geotextile or SLDS CDN from a maximum height of 24 inches.\n27 The spreading operation on the sideslope (3H:1V) shall begin at the lower elevations and shall\n28 proceed either upslope or laterally at about the same elevation such that a full layer of granular\n29 material is always covering the geomembrane downslope from the area being covered. In no case\n30 shaU the lift thickness be less than the stated minimum. Material shall be placed in such a manner\n31 that no air is trapped underneath the geomembrane. Provide and maintain a means of continuously\n32 observing the depth of granular materials such as by freestanding markers until placement is\n33 complete, at intervals of 50 feet maximum each way. Sharpened stakes or methods that could\n34 damage the geomembrane will not be allowed.\n35 Lining System Acceptance -Polyethylene Geomembranes\n36 The Installer shall retain all ownership of and responsibility for the geosynthetics in the lining system\n37 until acceptance by the Construction Manager.\n38 The geosynthetic lining system will be accepted by the Construction Manager when all of the\n39 following requirements have been satisfied:\n40 The installation is finished.\n41 Verification of the adequacy of all field seams and repairs, including associated testing, is complete.\n42 A written construction report, including \"as built\" drawings and all other installation documents, has\n43 been prepared by the CQA Certifying Engineer, sealed by a registered professional engineer, and\n44 received by the Construction Manager.\nAppendix 4D.77\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Supplements\n2 The supplements listed below, following \"END OF SECTION\", are a part of this Specification.\n3 Table 1. Required Geomembrane Properties, 60-mil Textured HDPE.\n4 Table 2. Required Seam Properties.\n5 Geomembrane Installer's Certification of Subsurface Acceptability.\n6 END OF SECTION 02661\n7\nAppendix 4D.78\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTable 1. Required Geomembrane Properties 60-Mil Textured HDPE\nSpecified Property Qualifier Unit Value Test Method\nPhysical Properties\nThickness min. avg. value mils 60 ASTM D5994\nminimum 54 ASTM D5994\nSpecific Gravity minimum 'N/A 0.932 ASTM D1505\nMelt Index range g/10 min <1.1 ASTM D1238\ncondition 190/2.16\nAsperity min avg. value' mils 10 GRI-GM12\nMechanical Properties\nTensile Properties (each direction) (Type IV) ASTM D638\nStrength at yield min. avg. value lb/in 120\nElongation at yield2 min. avg. value % 12\nTear Resistance min. avg. value lb 42 ASTM D1004\nPuncture Resistance min. avg. value lb 80 ASTM D4833\nCarbon Black Content Range % 2-3 ASTM D1603 or\nD4218\nCarbon Black Dispersion Minimum, 8 of 10 category I or 2 ASTM D5596\nEnvironmental Stress\nCrack minimum' hrs 200 ASTM D5397\n2 'Of 10 readings, 8 out of 10 must be greater or equal to 7 mils, and lowest individual reading must be greater or equal to 5 mils.\n3 Provide data for both sides of textured geomembrane.\n4 2 Yield elongation is calculated using a gauge length of 1.3 inches.\n5 3 Minimum = mean minus 3 standard deviations from documented manufacturer's quality control (MQC) testing.\n6\nAppendix 4D.79\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTable 2. Required Seam Properties Hdpe Geomembranes\nProperty Qualifier Unit Specified Value Test Method\nShear Strength' minimum lb/in width 90% of tensile strength at yield as ASTM D6392\nlisted in tables in this section\nPeel Adhesion minimum lb/in width 60% of tensile strength at yield as ASTM D6392\nlisted in tables in this section and\nFTB2\n2 'Also called \"Bonded Seam Strength\".\n3 2FTB = Film Tear Bond (failure occurs through intact geomembrane, not through seam).\n4\nAppendix 4D.80\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Geomembrane Installer's Certification of Subsurface Acceptability\n2 The geomembrane installer,\n3 for the Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF), hereby certifies that the supporting prepared subgrade surfaces\n4 are acceptable for installation of the HDPE geomembrane lining system, the undersigned having\n5 personally inspected the condition of the constructed surfaces. This certification is for the areas shown on\n6 Attachment or defined as follows:\n7 The condition of the supporting surfaces in the defined area meets or exceeds the minimum requirements\n8 for installation of the geomembrane.\n9 Signed: Signed:\n10 Geomembrane Installer Construction General Contractor\n11\n12 Date Signed Date Signed\n13\nAppendix 4D.81\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 02666-ADMIX LINER SCHED. B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 References\n4 The publications listed below form a part of this Specification to the extent referenced. The publications\n5 are referred to in the text by basic designation only.\n6 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n7 ASTM D698 Test Method for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard\n8 Effort (12,400 ft-lbs/ft) (600 Kn-m/m')\n9 ASTM D422 Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils\n10 ASTM D2216 Method for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and\n11 Rock by Mass\n12 ASTM D6391 Standard Test Method for Field Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity Limits\n13 of Porous Materials Using Two Stages of Infiltration from a Borehole\n14 Description\n15 This section describes the low permeability admix that will be used in the liner of the disposal\n16 facility. In addition requirements for base soil in the lining system are specified.\n17 The admix liner is an admixture that consists of natural base soil which is mixed with bentonite and\n18 moisture conditioned.\n19 Submittals-Approval Required\n20 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n21 The Construction General Contractor shall submit a detailed plan for preparation of the admix\n22 material, including a description of the equipment and procedures to be used, personnel\n23 qualifications, and methods for monitoring bentonite additions and moisture conditioning. This plan\n24 shall be approved by the Engineer prior to the start of admix production.\n25 The Construction General Contractor shall submit an admix liner placement plan to specify lift\n26 thickness control and to allow for required testing, specified herein and described in the CQA Plan,\n27 on the soil liner during placement operations. This plan shall be approved by the Engineer prior to\n28 the start of admix placement.\n29 Supplier's descriptive data, specification sheets, literature, and other data as necessary to fully\n30 demonstrate that the bentonite proposed for use in the admix complies with the requirements of these\n31 Specifications. The manufacturer shall certify that the bentonite furnished complies with these\n32 Specifications. A certificate shall be submitted to the CQA Certifying Engineer for each railcar or\n33 every three truckloads of bentonite delivered.\n34 Certificates for equipment calibration.\n35 Construction Quality Assurance\n36 Construction Quality Assurance testing will be provided by the CQA Certifying Engineer and shall be\n37 performed in accordance with the CQA Plan. The Construction General Contractor shall make\n38 allowances for sampling and testing by the CQA Certifying Engineer in both his production\n39 operations and schedule.\n40 Prior to placing any materials over the completed admix liner, the Construction General Contractor\n41 shall allow time for acceptance of the Work as listed in the CQA Plan. The Construction General\n42 Contractor shall accommodate all CQA testing and sampling activities, as specified in the CQA Plan\n43 (i.e., in addition to the QC testing), and shall repair sample locations as specified herein.\nAppendix 4D.82\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Definitions\n2 Grain Size: Determined by ASTM D422.\n3 Imported Material: Meets requirements of this Specification and is obtained offsite and transported to\n4 site.\n5 Natural Moisture Content: Determined by ASTM D2216.\n6 Optimum Moisture Content: Determined in accordance with ASTM D698 specified to determine\n7 maximum dry density for relative compaction.\n8 Admix: Natural material (base soil), as specified in this section, that when mixed with bentonite.\n9 Admix Liner: Compacted liner component consisting of admix materials, designed, formulated, and\n10 constructed to provide low-permeability barrier against infiltration of liquids or contaminants.\n11 Tolerances\n12 Thickness of the admix liner shall be a minimum of 3 feet and tolerances for the top of admix grade\n13 shown on Phase I Primary Liner Plan shall be minus 0.1 foot to plus 0.3 foot. The top surface of the\n14 admix liner along the north-south centerline of each cell shall be graded to provide a minimum slope\n15 of 1.0% for the LCRS collection pipe installation. The minimum required thickness of the soil liner\n16 layer shall be maintained. The as-built elevations of the underlying prepared subgrade shall be used\n17 as the basis for determining the final elevation of the soil liner layer.\n18 Part 2 -Products\n19 Bentonite\n20 The bentonite shall be Bara-Kade 90, manufactured by Bentonite Performance Materials, Inc.; or\n21 approved equal. Do not provide calcium bentonites or chemically treated sodium bentonites.\n22 The bentonite to be used in the admix shall consist of a commercially prepared material and shall have the\n23 following index properties:\n24 High Swelling: Ability of 2 grams of base bentonite, when mechanically reduced to minus 100 mesh, to\n25 swell in water to an apparent volume of 20 cubic centimeters or more when added gradually to 100 cubic\n26 centimeters of distilled water contained in graduated cylinder.\n27 Dry Fineness:\n28 65 percent minimum passing No. 200 U.S. Sieve.\n29 The Construction General Contractor shall provide suitable containers on site to store bentonite in a\n30 dry condition prior to use.\n31 Base Soil\n32 The base soil for the admix liner shall consist of natural soil derived from the admix base soil borrow\n33 area shown on the Drawings, as specified in Section 02317, BORROW AREA EXCAVATION, or\n34 from site excavations. Base soil from either source shall not be excavated below a depth of 5 feet\n35 below ground surface (after stripping) without evaluation of the material suitability and approval from\n36 the Engineer. This material may be temporarily stockpiled at the stockpile area as shown on the\n37 Drawings, or within processing area within Phase I as approved by the Construction Manager.\n38 Base soil excavated from dune sand borrows area or site excavation shall meet the following\n39 requirements: The base soil shall be free of roots, woody vegetation, frozen material, rubbish, and\n40 other deleterious material. Rocks greater than 1 inch in dimension shall not comprise more than\n41 2 percent by weight of the base soil. Base soil shall have 20 percent minimum passing No. 200 U.S.\n42 Sieve. Base soil shall be screened or otherwise processed if necessary to meet this requirement.\nAppendix 4D.83\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 For evaluating compliance with these requirements, test results shall be considered acceptable when\n2 the average value of the data satisfies the associated criterion. Testing and sampling frequency for\n3 base soil compliance is provided in the CQA Plan.\n4 Admix Liner Material (Admix)\n5 Composition: The admix shall consist of the base soil mixed with a nominal bentonite content of\n6 12 percent by dry weight of base soil by dry weight. The acceptable range for bentonite content shall be a\n7 minimum of 11 percent and maximum of 14 percent of base soil by dry weight. The bentonite percentage\n8 and moisture content range may change as a result of preconstruction testing performed on the test pad as\n9 described in the CQA Plan, and may be modified by the Construction General Contractor with the\n10 approval of the Construction Manager, Engineer, and the CQA Certifying Engineer at any time during the\n11 admix processing to reflect changes in the base soil or other components. The moisture content and\n12 bentonite dispersion in the admix shall be uniform and homogenous. The finished admix shall be a\n13 uniform homogenous material.\n14 CQA Testing: The admix shall be prepared by the Construction General Contractor and tested by the\n15 CQA Certifying Engineer in accordance with the CQA Plan. The Construction General Contractor shall\n16 make the admix stockpiles available to the CQA Certifying Engineer at all times for sampling, testing, or\n17 visual observation.\n18 Raw Water Supply: See Section 02200, SITE PREPARATION, and the Drawings for information on\n19 raw water supply availability and requirements for admix processing and admix liner placement and\n20 compaction.\n21 Part 3 -Execution\n22 Admix Processing\n23 Bentonite Use Monitoring: Record weight of bentonite used and volume of admix produced each day.\n24 Processing Using Pugmill:\n25 The Construction General Contractor shall process and condition admix material using a central type\n26 pugmill plant prior to compaction. The pugmill shall have automated controls to continuously control\n27 the established proportions of bentonite and water as ratios of the base soil. It shall have provisions to\n28 easily change the proportions. It shall be capable of maintaining a constant time of mixing and\n29 varying the rate of discharge so that the degree of mixing can be controlled if necessary to achieve\n30 complete mixing.\n31 The Construction General Contractor shall provide all necessary equipment and labor to operate the\n32 pugmill, load material into pugmill, offload admix, and stockpile admix.\n33 Equipment: Admix shall be prepared using a pugmill with the following characteristics and ancillary\n34 equipment:\n35 Continuous mixing pugmill. Blades shall be adjustable for angular position on shafts and shall be\n36 reversible to retard flow of mix.\n37 Belt scales on base soil, bentonite, and finished product belts.\n38 Feed rate meters and totalizers for bentonite, base soil, and water.\n39 Production rate meters and totalizers for finished product.\n40 Variable speed hydraulic supply water pumps capable of producing 500 tons per hour of admixture.\n41 Calibration:\n42 After setting up the pugmill, it shall be calibrated to determine the accuracy of the feed rate for each\n43 material being mixed. When the feed controls are set at any desired rate, the measured accuracy shall\n44 be within 1 percent by weight of the indicated feed rate for the item being mixed.\nAppendix 4D.84\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI The accuracy will be determined by operating each feed control separately and collecting and\n2 weighing the material over a given period of time as determined by the CQA Certifying Engineer.\n3 The material shall be collected in a dump truck (or appropriate container) supplied by the\n4 Construction General Contractor, and the truck will be weighed by the Construction General\n5 Contractor and verified by the CQA Certifying Engineer before and after loading. During admix\n6 production; the CQA Certifying Engineer may request a recalibration of the feed rate for each\n7 material as described above.\n8 All measuring equipment shall be calibrated and calibration certificates provided to the CQA\n9 Certifying Engineer prior to starting admix production.\n10 Preparation Requirements:\n11 The base soil shall be processed through a pugmill to add bentonite at the specified rate, to add\n12 additional water if required, and to provide mechanical mixing action required to homogeneously\n13 blend the bentonite and water into the mix. Additional mixing by rotovator or other approved means\n14 shall be performed at the Construction General Contractor's sole expense as required to further break\n15 down the soil clumps or if additional mixing is needed to achieve a homogenous blend of soil, water,\n16 and bentonite. The admix shall be broken down in size sufficiently to result in at least 80 percent of\n17 the soil clumps broken down to 1/2 inch in maximum size. Clods are defined as dry hard particles in\n18 the admix that cannot be remolded by hand pressure.\n19 If mixing is found to be insufficient to produce a thoroughly blended, uniform mixture of base soil\n20 and bentonite, or the base soil and bentonite are not being mixed in the specified proportions, the\n21 Construction General Contractor shall stop production of admix material. The Construction General\n22 Contractor shall not restart production and installation of admix liner until procedures and equipment\n23 have been modified so that the specified material is produced. Admix liner that is installed without\n24 complete mixing or the correct percentage of bentonite shall be removed and modified by the\n25 Construction General Contractor to meet the Specifications. After being modified to meet the\n26 Specifications, the material may be reinstalled in the lining. Additional work and delays caused by\n27 inadequate or incorrect mixing shall be performed at the Construction General Contractor's sole\n28 expense. The Construction General Contractor shall not change the bentonite application rate unless\n29 directed to do so by the Engineer in writing.\n30 Admix shall be processed and allowed to cure at least 12 hours prior to placement. The Construction\n31 General Contractor shall be responsible for maintaining the moisture content of the admix within the\n32 specified limits. Admix that does not meet Specifications shall not be reused as feed stock unless\n33 approved by the Engineer and CQA Certifying Engineer.\n34 Test Pad(s)\n35 Test pads for the admix liner shall be constructed as specified in Article ADMIX LINER\n36 PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION, by the Construction General Contractor to determine\n37 acceptable placement and compaction methods to produce a low-permeability admix liner that\n38 satisfies the requirements of this section. Both a horizontal and sideslope test pad shall be\n39 constructed. The location of the test pads will be designated by the Construction Manager and the\n40 CQA Certifying Engineer.\n41 Test Pad Material: The Construction General Contractor will prepare a sufficient quantity of soil for the\n42 test pad in accordance with the requirements of Article ADMIX LINER MATERIAL. All specified\n43 procedures for mixing, conditioning, and stockpiling of the soil material will be followed.\n44 Horizontal Test Pad Construction:\n45 The test pad will be constructed on a horizontal surface within the limits of the IDF in an area\n46 representative of conditions beneath the waste disposal cells. The pad will be located in a well-drained\n47 area to prevent surface water intrusion or saturation of the test pad soils.\nAppendix 4D.85\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The test pad location will be cleared and grubbed, and the subgrade will be compacted in the same\n2 manner anticipated for construction beneath the waste disposal cells. Prior to placement of the test pad\n3 materials, the Contractor's Site Superintendent and the CQA Certifying Engineer will evaluate the\n4 condition of the subgrade; areas containing potentially unsuitable materials will be replaced, or another\n5 location will be selected for the test pad.\n6 So that the test pad will accurately represent the performance of the full-scale facility, the following\n7 guidelines will be followed:\n8 Construction of the test pad will use the same soil materials, design specifications, equipment, and\n9 procedures as proposed for the full-scale facility.\n10 The test pad will be constructed at least four times wider than the construction compactor drum width\n11 to be used for the full-scale facility and allow for installation of field permeability testing per method\n12 ASTM D6391 or 50 feet minimum (whichever is greater). This is required to ensure a sufficient\n13 representative area for testing, avoiding the edges of the test pad. The test pad may be subdivided\n14 into \"lanes\" to facilitate evaluation of different compaction methods; however, the width of any\n15 individual lane shall be no less than twice the width of the construction compactor drum equipment.\n16 The test pad will be long enough to allow construction equipment to achieve normal operating speed\n17 before reaching the area that will be used for testing or 80 feet minimum (whichever is greater).\n18 The test pad will be constructed with at least six lifts to evaluate the methodology used to tie lifts\n19 together. Lift thickness will be as described in Article ADMIX PLACEMENT AND\n20 COMPACTION, and the total thickness of the test pad will be at least 3 feet.\n21 The test pad constructed will include the removal and replacement of a portion of the soil to evaluate\n22 the method proposed for repairing defective portions of the full-scale liner as specified in Article\n23 REPAIR OF ADMIX LINER.\n24 Sideslope Test Pad Construction:\n25 The sideslope test pad will be constructed on a 3H: 1V sideslope (within the lined area of Phase 1) to\n26 evaluate compaction methods and performance on the sideslope. Field permeability testing is not\n27 required for sideslope test pad. Sideslope test pad will be used to demonstrate that compaction and\n28 placement methods to achieve acceptable moisture and density requirements can be achieved.\n29 So that the test pad will accurately represent the performance of the full-scale facility, the following\n30 guidelines will be followed:\n31 Construction of the test pad will use the same soil materials, design specifications, equipment, and\n32 procedures as proposed for the full-scale facility.\n33 The test pad will be constructed at least four times wider than the widest piece of construction\n34 equipment to be used for the full-scale facility or 40 feet minimum (whichever is greater). This is\n35 required to ensure a sufficient representative area for testing, avoiding the edges of the test pad. The\n36 test pad may be subdivided into \"lanes\" to facilitate evaluation of different compaction methods;\n37 however, the width of any individual lane shall be no less than twice the width of the widest piece of\n38 construction equipment.\n39 The test pad will be long enough to allow construction equipment to achieve normal operating speed\n40 before reaching the area that will be used for testing or 80 feet minimum (whichever is greater).\n41 The test pad will be constructed with at least six lifts to evaluate the methodology used to tie lifts\n42 together. Lift thickness will be as described in Article SOIL BENTONITE PLACEMENT AND\n43 COMPACTION, and the total thickness of the test pad will be at least 3 feet.\n44 Demonstrate the Following During Test Pad(s) Construction:\n45 Base soil/bentonite mixing process prior to compaction.\n46 Compaction equipment type, configuration, and weight.\nAppendix 4D.86\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The method used to break down clods before compaction and maximum resulting clod size.\n2 The speed of compaction equipment traveling over the test pad.\n3 Moisture content of soil bentonite at time of compaction.\n4 Lift thicknesses (compacted), compaction procedures, and number of passes for proposed compaction\n5 equipment.\n6 Dry unit weight achieved and measured by field density testing.\n7 Hydraulic conductivity of compacted test fill on undisturbed samples (Shelby Tubes) as described in\n8 the Construction Quality Assurance (CQA) Plan.\n9 Field permeability of compacted test fill using ASTM D6391 (horizontal test pad only) as described\n10 in the CQA Plan.\n11 Excavate at least four holes, each 3 feet square, through each completed pad for observation,\n12 sampling, and testing of compacted material. These holes shall be used for the purpose of\n13 demonstrating repair methods as specified herein.\n14 No admix liner shall be placed until the associated test pad has been constructed and the results from\n15 all test methods indicate that the admix liner will satisfy the permeability requirements specified in\n16 this section. Testing for each test pad shall be as described in the CQA Plan. At the completion of\n17 the test pad(s), the CQA Certifying Engineer, as described in the CQA Plan, will prepare an interim\n18 report with recommendations for compaction and placement methods to be applied to the full-scale\n19 admix liner construction.\n20 After all testing has been completed and approved, the material in the test pad can be used by the\n21 Construction General Contractor for liner construction provided that the material satisfies the\n22 requirements of these Specifications.\n23 Subqrade Preparation\n24 As specified in Section 02319, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, Article PREPARED SUBGRADE FOR\n25 ADMIX LINER.\n26 Admix Liner Placement and Compaction\n27 Lift Thickness: Admix liner material, as specified in Article ADMIX LINER MATERIAL, shall be\n28 placed in loose lifts, and compacted such that the compacted lift thickness is 6 inches or less (within a\n29 tolerance of 0.1 foot). However, the first lift of admix liner placed over subgrade soils may be placed and\n30 compacted to a maximum thickness of 8 inches (within a tolerance of 0.1 foot).\n31 Placement methods shall prevent excessive mixing of admix liner with subgrade soil.\n32 Compaction: The intent of this Specification is that admix liner shall be produced to meet an in-place\n33 performance specification of less than 1x10 -'cm/sec hydraulic conductivity within the limits of edge of\n34 liner shown on the Drawings. See paragraph Outside Edge of Liner in this Article for compaction and\n35 hydraulic conductivity requirements beyond edge of liner. The Construction General Contractor is\n36 responsible to develop and use compaction methods that produce the required relative compaction.\n37 The moisture-density ranges of the compacted admix shall lie within a trapezoidal-shaped field with the\n38 following corners:\nMoisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf)\n8 126\n12 110\n14 126\n19 110\nAppendix 4D.87\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Hydraulic Conductivity: The in-place compacted admix liner shall achieve a saturated hydraulic\n2 conductivity as listed below:\n3 All field (in-situ) test results shall be I x 10-7 cm/sec or less. Field (in-situ) hydraulic conductivity\n4 tests will be performed only on admix liner of the horizontal test pad.\n5 All hydraulic conductivity during admix production placement will be verified on undisturbed Shelby\n6 tube samples (see ASTM D1587) obtained from in-place admix liner per the CQA plan and then\n7 tested in laboratory using methods as described in ASTM D5084.\n8 Hydraulic conductivity will be verified on undisturbed samples from completed areas of the liner as\n9 described in the CQA Plan. The arithmetic average of laboratory test results on undisturbed Shelby\n10 tube samples shall be less than or equal to 5 x 10-8 cm/sec, with no individual test result exceeding 1 x\n11 10-7cm/sec. The acceptable values for laboratory test results will be verified or adjusted prior to\n12 admix liner production placement based on the correlation of field and laboratory hydraulic\n13 conductivity test results from the horizontal test pad. The final laboratory hydraulic conductivity\n14 requirement will be approved by the CQA Certifying Engineer and documented in the horizontal test\n15 pad report.\n16 Outside Edge of Liner: Compact admix liner as specified herein. Performance specification for admix\n17 hydraulic conductivity do not apply to admix placed beyond edge of liner.\n18 Uniformity: The compacted soil distribution and gradation throughout the liner shall be free from lenses,\n19 pockets, streaks, layers, or material differing substantially in texture, moisture content, dry density, or\n20 gradation from surrounding material. The admix liner material shall be free of organic debris, frozen\n21 material, rubbish, construction debris, and other deleterious material. Any soil containing unacceptable\n22 material shall be removed and discarded in the permanent stockpile, placed in accordance with\n23 Section 02315, FILL AND BACKFILL.\n24 Moisture Conditioning:\n25 The moisture content of the admix liner shall be uniform throughout each lift prior to and during\n26 compaction of the material. If the moisture content of a lift of compacted admix liner falls below the\n27 acceptable limit during placement operations, the Construction General Contractor shall moisture\n28 condition the dry soil and re-compact the lift prior to placement of additional lifts. If the moisture\n29 content of a lift of compacted soil exceeds the acceptable limit due to precipitation or over watering,\n30 the Construction General Contractor, before placement of additional lifts, shall either allow the wet\n31 soil to dry back or remove the wet soil. If the admix liner material cannot be conditioned to meet the\n32 placement specifications, the material shall be removed and replaced with new admix liner.\n33 When the final lift of admix liner placement will be interrupted for more than a few hours or when\n34 precipitation is imminent, as determined by the Contractor's Site Superintendent, the lift surface shall\n35 be sealed with a smooth drum roller to prevent excessive moisture infiltration. This surface shall be\n36 scarified with a rotovator, or other equivalent equipment, immediately prior to resuming soil\n37 placement. The Construction General Contractor shall verify that existing moisture content is within\n38 the range specified in Article ADMIX LINER PLACEMENT AND COMPACTION, prior to\n39 resumption of soil placement activities.\n40 Placement Equipment: The Construction General Contractor shall place layers of the admix liner to\n41 form a continuous monolithic material. All admix liner shall be placed and compacted with a self-\n42 propelled pegfoot or padfoot roller compactor having a minimum operating weight of 68,000 pounds.\n43 Smaller compaction equipment may be used in limited areas as necessary provided that the required\n44 moisture/density, lift bonding, and hydraulic conductivity can be achieved. Hydraulic conductivity\n45 performance specification for the admix liner will be verified in areas where the lighter equipment is\n46 used. Hauling and spreading equipment will not be considered as compaction equipment. The compactor\n47 feet shall be sufficiently long to knead (bond) new lifts into previously placed lifts.\nAppendix 4D.88\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The feet shall be kept free of large amounts of dried soil that might restrict foot penetration or become\n2 incorporated into the soil lift. The top of each lift may be scarified with a rotovator, or other equivalent\n3 equipment or procedures, prior to placing the subsequent lift. The final lift of admix liner may be\n4 compacted with a smooth drum roller provided that all other requirements are met.\n5 Provide a smooth soil surface on the final lift prior to placement of the HDPE geomembrane as specified\n6 in Article SURFACE FINISHING.\n7 Tie-in Areas: Where new admix liner is tied in to existing admix of a previous day's placement, any\n8 areas of the existing admix which are soft, cracked, or otherwise unsuitable shall be removed until\n9 acceptable material is exposed. Where new admix will be placed, the surface of the existing admix liner\n10 shall be scarified and moisture conditioned as described in this section. New admix liner shall be placed\n11 in accordance with the requirements of this section and shall be thoroughly kneaded into the existing\n12 admix liner to form a monolithic mass free of seams or other discontinuities.\n13 Placement Method: Admix liner may be placed on the sideslopes in either horizontal lifts (along the\n14 contour) or in lifts parallel to the slope (up and down the slope). If admix liner is placed parallel to the\n15 slope, compaction equipment shall not spin their wheels or in any other way disturb the previously placed\n16 lifts. If this occurs, the Construction General Contractor shall place all of the admix liner in horizontal\n17 lifts.\n18 Restrictions: Production, mixing, and stockpiling of admix or native clay soil shall be restricted to the\n19 area shown on the Drawings or within the Phase I footprint as approved by the Construction Manager.\n20 Surface Finishing\n21 The surface of the admix liner shall be trimmed to the design grades and tolerances as shown on the\n22 Drawings. The surface of the admix liner shall be rolled with a smooth-drum roller to remove all\n23 ridges and surface irregularities as specified in Section 02319, SUBGRADE PREPARATION. All\n24 wheel ruts in excess of depths specified in Section 02319, SUBGRADE PREPARATION, on the\n25 surface of the admix liner shall be repaired by the Construction General Contractor prior to placement\n26 of the geomembrane. Acceptable methods for repair of the admix liner are specified in Article\n27 REPAIR OF ADMIX LINER.\n28 Maintenance\n29 The Construction General Contractor shall maintain the admix liner surface in a condition suitable for\n30 geomembrane installation until the surface is covered. The admix liner shall be protected from\n31 desiccation or excessive moisture. This may be accomplished by periodic watering, exclusion of\n32 traffic, placement of a temporary removable plastic cover, or other methods. Desiccation cracks\n33 larger than 1 inch deep or 0.25 inch wide shall be excavated to the full depth of the crack and repaired\n34 as specified in Article REPAIR OF ADMIX LINER. In the event that the geomembrane cannot be\n35 installed within 12 hours after placement of the final admix liner lift, the final lift of admix liner shall\n36 be constructed 4 to 6 inches thicker than required and cut to finish grade immediately before\n37 geomembrane deployment.\n38 The Construction General Contractor shall take measures to prevent the admix liner from freezing.\n39 Lifts of admix liner shall not be placed on frozen surfaces. Geomembrane shall not be placed on a\n40 surface, which is frozen or has been frozen and thawed until directed by the Construction Manager\n41 and the CQA Certifying Engineer.\n42 Repair of Admix Liner\n43 The Construction General Contractor shall repair the surface of any areas identified to be out of\n44 tolerance. The size of the repair area shall be as required to remove and/or repair defective areas of\n45 the admix liner. Repair as follows:\n46 Remove soil that does not meet specifications.\nAppendix 4D.89\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Scarify surface and spray with water.\n2 Place additional approved admix material.\n3 Compact soil with self-propelled pegfoot or padfoot type compactor as described above.\n4 Trim and roll the surface as described above to design grades and tolerances.\n5 Alternative methods for repair of the admix liner will be allowed if submitted by the Construction\n6 General Contractor and approved by the Engineer and Construction Manager.\n7 Construction General Contractor will repair small holes (up to a maximum 6-inch diameter) resulting\n8 from sampling and other CQA activities. Such holes shall be repaired by backfilling with admix liner\n9 or powdered bentonite material in lifts of no more than 2-inch thickness and hand tamping with a\n10 steel rod or other suitable device to firmly compact each lift.\n11 Construction Quality Assurance and Acceptance\n12 Testing and criteria for admix liner acceptance is provided in the CQA Plan, which is made part of these\n13 Specifications by reference.\n14 END OF SECTION 02666\nAppendix 4D.90\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI SECTION 02667 -GEOSYNTHETIC CLAY LINER (GCL) SCHED. B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 References\n4 The publications listed below form a part of this Specification to the extent referenced. The publications\n5 are referred to in the text by basic designation only.\n6 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n7 ASTM D4632 Standard Test Method for Grab Breaking Load and Elongation of Geotextiles\n8 ASTM D4643 Standard Test Method for Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil by\n9 the Microwave Oven Method\n10 ASTM D4833 Standard Test Method for Index Puncture Resistance of Geotextiles,\n11 Geomembranes and Related Products\n12 ASTM D5084 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Hydraulic Conductivity of Saturated\n13 Porous Materials Using a Flexible Wall Permeameter\n14 ASTM D5887 Standard Test Method for Measurement of Index Flux Through Saturated\n15 Geosynthetic Clay Liner Specimens Using a Flexible Wall Permeameter\n16 ASTM D5890 Standard Test Method for Swell Index of Clay Mineral Component of\n17 Geosynthetic Clay Liner\n18 ASTM D5891 Standard Test Method for Fluid Loss of Clay Component of Geosynthetic Clay\n19 Liners\n20 ASTM D5993 Standard Test Method for Measuring Mass per Unit of Geosynthetic Clay Liners\n21 Description\n22 The Work includes supply and installation of geosynthetic clay liners (GCLs) for the landfill lining\n23 system as shown on the Drawings.\n24 SubmiMtals-Aaprovat Required\n25 See Section 0 13M00, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n26 Submit manufacturer's descriptive data, specification sheets, literature, and other data as necessary to\n27 fully demonstrate that the materials proposed for use comply with the requirements of these\n28 Specifications.\n29 Submit manufacturer's quality control test results, written properties certification guarantee, and QC\n30 certificates, as specified in PART 2-PRODUCTS.\n31 Construction Quality Assurance (OQA)\n32 Quality assurance procedures are presented in the CQA Plan. CQA Plan requirements are discussed\n33 in Section 02661, GEOMEMBRANES. The Construction General Contractor shall accommodate all\n34 quality assurance activities described herein and in the Construction Quality Assurance Plan (CQA\n35 Plan) for this project.\n36 Prior to placing any materials over the installed GCL, the Construction General Contractor shall allow\n37 time for acceptance of the Work as listed in the CQA Plan.\n38 CQA Conformance Testin (\n39 Prior to deployment of the GCL, CQA personnel will remove samples and forward them to an\n40 approved geosynthetics laboratory for testing to document conformance to both the design\n41 specifications and the list of guaranteed properties.\nAppendix 4D.91\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Unless otherwise specified, samples shall be taken at a rate of one per lot or one per 50,000 square\n2 feet, whichever results in the greater number of tests. Samples shall be taken from any portion of the\n3 roll that has not been damaged. Unless otherwise specified, samples shall be 3 feet long by the roll\n4 width. The machine direction shall be marked on the samples with an arrow.\n5 As a minimum, the following tests shall be performed on GCL:\n6 1. Bentonite Swell Index: ASTM D5890.\n7 2. GCL Index Flux: ASTM D5887.\n8 3. Bentonite Mass per Unit Area: ASTM D5993.\n9 The CQA Certifying Engineer shall be allowed to remove samples of GCL for testing and other\n10 activities. Sample dimensions, procedures, and frequency shall be the same as those specified in the\n11 CQA Plan. The Construction General Contractor shall assist the CQA Certifying Engineer as\n12 necessary in all sampling and testing activities.\n13 Procedures for samples that fail conformance testing are outlined in the CQA Plan. The cost of\n14 additional conformance testing to demonstrate compliance of failed samples shall be borne by the\n15 Construction General Contractor.\n16 Part 2 -Products\n17 GCL\n18 GCL shall be BENTOMAT(R) DN as manufactured by Colloid Environmental Technologies Co.\n19 (CETCO), Arlington Heights, IL; or Bentofix NWL as manufactured by GSE Lining Systems, Houston,\n20 TX; or approved equal, and shall meet the following requirements:\nProperty Requirement Test Method\nBentonite Mass/Area, lb/sq ft at 0%\nmoisture content, MinARV 0.75 ASTM D5993\nBentonite Fluid Loss, mL, MaxARV 18 ASTM D5891\nBentonite Swell Index, mL/2g, MinARV 24 ASTM D5890\nGrab Strength, lb, Tested Dry, MinARV 150 ASTM D4632\nPeel Strength, lb, Tested Dry, MinARV 15 ASTM D4632\nIndex Flux, m3/m2/sec, MaxARV 1xl08- ASTM D5887\n* 2 psi Water Head Pressure\n* 5 psi Effective Confining Pressure\nPermeability with Water, cm/sec, MaxARV 5x10-9 ASTM D5084\n* 2 psi Water Head Pressure\n* 5 psi Effective Confining Pressure\nFinished GCL Roll Width, Feet, MinARV 14 Linear Measurement\nFinished GCL Roll Length, Feet, MinARV 150 Linear Measurement\n21 The bentonite in the GCL shall be a sodium montmorillonite clay.\n22 The GCL shall be manufactured so that the bentonite shall be continuously contained throughout the\n23 GCL and to support the geotextiles so that no displacement of the bentonite occurs when the material\n24 is unrolled, moved, cut, torn, or punctured. GCL products that utilize an alternate edge system with\n25 grooves cut in seam overlap areas are permitted subject to approval of the Engineer.\nAppendix 4D.92\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Any adhesive used shall be inert, nontoxic, and water-soluble. GCL materials made without the use\n2 of adhesives shall be stabilized to contain the granular bentonite by a process such as needle punching\n3 or stitching through the top and bottom layers of geotextile and the bentonite.\n4 Encapsulating geotextile materials shall be polypropylene, consisting of two nonwoven geotextile\n5 components, which are needle-punched together. The nonwoven components of the GCL shall have\n6 a nominal mass per unit area of 6 ounces per square yard needle-punched geotextile.\n7 Quality control testing shall be carried out by the manufacturer to demonstrate that the GCL meets the\n8 specifications in this section. Tests shall be conducted on each production lot of GCL or every\n9 50,000 square feet, whichever results in the greater number of tests.\n10 The manufacturer shall provide a written guarantee that the GCL has the properties listed on the\n11 specification sheet.\n12 The GCL manufacturer shall provide a quality control certification that the GCL has the properties\n13 listed on the specification sheet for each roll of GCL shipped to the project site. The quality control\n14 certificate shall be signed by a responsible party employed by the manufacturer, such as the\n15 production manager. The quality control certificate shall include:\n16 1. Roll numbers and production lot identification.\n17 2. Results of manufacturer quality control tests.\n18 3. Results of bentonite supplier quality control tests for bentonite used in GCL production.\n19 Accessory Bentonite\n20 Accessory bentonite for seaming shall be as recommended by the GCL manufacturer.\n21 Transportation, Handling, and Storage\n22 Transportation of the GCL shall be the responsibility of the manufacturer, and the Construction\n23 General Contractor. All handling on site shall be the responsibility of the Construction General\n24 Contractor.\n25 Upon delivery at the site, the Construction General Contractor shall observe the surfaces of all rolls\n26 for defects and for damage. This inspection shall be conducted without unrolling rolls unless defects\n27 or damages are found or suspected. The Construction General Contractor will determine:\n28 Rolls, or portions thereof, which should be rejected and removed from the site because they have\n29 severe flaws.\n30 Rolls that are not properly labeled. No unlabelled rolls shall be used for any application. Unlabelled\n31 rolls shall be removed from the site and replaced at the Construction General Contractor's expense.\n32 The Construction General Contractor shall be responsible for the storage of the GCL onsite. The\n33 Construction General Contractor shall provide storage space in a location as shown on the Drawings\n34 or as approved by the Construction Manager such that on-site transportation and handling are\n35 optimized to the extent possible. Storage space shall be protected from theft, vandalism, passage of\n36 vehicles, etc. Stored GCLs shall be protected from moisture and other damaging conditions in\n37 accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.\n38 Part 3 -Execution\n39 General\n40 Install GCLs at the locations, lines, and grades shown on the Drawings. All GCLs shall be installed\n41 in accordance with these Specifications.\n42 Materials and work, which fail to meet the requirements of these Specifications, shall be removed and\n43 disposed of at the Construction General Contractor's expense. This includes GCL rolls that are not\n44 labeled or where the label has deteriorated to the point of being illegible.\nAppendix 4D.93\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Handling And Placement\n2 The Construction General Contractor shall handle and deploy all GCLs in such a manner as to ensure\n3 that they are not damaged.\n4 Surface Preparation -Primary GCL\n5 For the IDF project, primary GCL will be deployed over the CDN surface. Primary GCL shall be\n6 placed over a firm, unyielding surface. Wrinkle height in the underlying LDSCDN shall be\n7 minimized as to allow primary GCL deployment on a flat unyielding surface. Maximum wrinkle\n8 height for geosynthetics is specified in Section 02661, GEOMEMBRANES.\n9 Surface Preparation -Secondary GCL\n10 As specified in Section 02319, SUBGRADE PREPARATION.\n11 Deployment\n12 GCL shall be deployed so that seams run up and down (not across) the slope.\n13 Prior to placement of cover material over the GCL and HDPE geomembrane, the moisture content of\n14 the bentonite component of the GCL shall not exceed 100 percent.\n15 Only areas of GCL suspected of exposure to excessive moisture, in the judgment of the CQA\n16 Certifying Engineer, shall be sampled for moisture content. GCL panels with bentonite component\n17 moisture content greater than 100 percent shall be removed and replaced at Construction General\n18 Contractor's expense, regardless of the source of moisture, including adsorption from subgrade soil\n19 and/or condensation under the HDPE geomembrane or temporary plastic cover.\n20 Any wrinkles in excess of the maximum wrinkle height specified in Section 02661,\n21 GEOMEMBRANES, shall be reduced to below specified height by adjusting and smoothing the GCL\n22 after placement.\n23 GCL shall not be deployed during precipitation or in the presence of moisture, ponded water, snow,\n24 or in other situations that could cause premature hydration of the bentonite. Any GCL that hydrates\n25 prematurely shall be removed and replaced at the Construction General Contractor's expense.\n26 The panels shall be placed to provide an overlap of 6 inches on longitudinal (edge of roll) seams,\n27 regardless of slope steepness. The panels shall be placed to provide an overlap of 24 inches on\n28 transverse (end of roll) seams for slopes flatter than 6H:1 V. No transverse seams shall be allowed on\n29 slopes 6H:1V and steeper.\n30 No more GCL shall be deployed than can be covered with geomembrane or other protective layer the\n31 same day.\n32 Provide protection from wind uplift as necessary using sandbags or other method that will not damage\n33 the GCL.\n34 Overlapping GCL Panels\n35 Overlap marks 6 inches from the panel edge shall be marked longitudinally on the GCL to assist in\n36 obtaining the proper overlap.\n37 Prior to lapping, remove all dirt, gravel, or other debris from the overlap area. Apply 1/4 pound of\n38 accessory per linear foot of seam. Lap areas that have been contaminated by soil and/or sand shall\n39 receive additional accessory bentonite in the amount of 1/4 pound per linear foot evenly spread across\n40 the longitudinal seam area. GCL products with alternate edge treatment system with grooves cut in\n41 the seam overlap area that eliminate the requirement for accessory bentonite, are permitted for edge\n42 of roll seams with prior approval by the Engineer. Accessory bentonite shall be required for end of\n43 roll seams.\n44 End of roll overlap on slopes less than 6H: 1V shall be shingled so that the direction of flow is from\n45 the top panel onto the bottom panel.\nAppendix 4D.94\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 On slopes 6H:1V and steeper, the panels shall be placed with the long dimension (length) continuous\n2 from the crest to the toe and the upper end anchored in a trench with soil backfill as shown on the\n3 Drawings.\n4 Repairs\n5 Replace or repair damaged or hydrated areas of GCL.\n6 Place a patch of GCL that extends at least 12 inches beyond the edges of the damaged area in all\n7 directions.\n8 Overlap areas shall conform to requirements for seams described above.\n9 Placement Of Overlying Materials On Geosynthetic Clay Lining\n10 The GCL shall be completely covered with HDPE geomembrane or temporary plastic cover and\n11 protected at the end of each shift or workday. The Construction General Contractor shall be fully\n12 responsible to protect the GCL from damage, shrinkage, or prehydration and shall replace all affected\n13 materials at the Construction General Contractor's sole expense.\n14 To prevent premature hydration or shrinkage in hot weather, only the amount of GCL that can be\n15 anchored, inspected, repaired, and covered with HDPE geomembrane or temporary plastic cover in\n16 the same day shall be installed.\n17 Equipment used to install the overlying materials shall not operate directly on the GCL.\n18 Construction General Contractor shall use a \"rub sheet\" of smooth HDPE geomembrane between the\n19 GCL and textured HDPE geomembrane to prevent damage to the GCL while maneuvering the\n20 textured HDPE geomembrane into position for seaming. Construction General Contractor shall\n21 develop method(s) of removing rub sheet that, after maneuvering textured HDPE geomembrane into\n22 place, prevents damage to toe underlying GCL.\n23 Overlying materials shall be placed over the GCL and HDPE geomembrane as specified in\n24 Section 02661, GEOMEMBRANES.\n25 END OF SECTION 02667\nAppendix 4D.95\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 02920 -RECLAMATION AND REVEGETATION SCHED. A & B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 Summary\n4 This section includes, but is not limited to, stabilization measures to prevent wind and water caused\n5 erosion of areas disturbed by the construction.\n6 References\n7 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n8 ASTM D586 Standard Test Method for Ash in Pulp, Paper, and Paper Products\n9 Submittals-Approval Required\n10 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for procedures.\n11 Manufacturer's technical data and installation recommendations for erosion control matting,\n12 including type and spacing of anchorage devices.\n13 Manufacturer's written certification that wood fiber mulch product contains less than 250 parts per\n14 million boron, is nontoxic to plant and animal life, and satisfies the specified organic matter content\n15 as determined by ASTM D586.\n16 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n17 Information/Record (IR):\n18 Tackifier and Mulch: Submit manufacturer's information and/or product data sheets for the tackifier\n19 selected for use on this project. Include confirmation of the application rate, which will be used. Submit\n20 Material Safety Data Sheets for the tackifier and any dye used in the tackifier and mulch application.\n21 Installation warranty.\n22 Part 2 -Products\n23 Materials:\n24 Topsoil: Strippings that are free from toxic minerals, noxious weeds, and other objectionable material\n25 shall be used for topsoil in accordance with Section 02200, SITE PREPARATION. Vegetation shall be\n26 removed during clearing and grubbing in accordance with Section 02200, SITE PREPARATION. The\n27 removed vegetation, other than noxious weeds, shall be reduced to pieces that are no larger than 1 inch in\n28 any dimension and shall be incorporated uniformly into the strippings. Large clods, hard lumps, rocks 2\n29 inches in diameter and larger, and litter shall be removed from the topsoil.\n30 Topsoil shall be stockpiled in accordance with Section 02200, SITE PREPARATION.\n31 Grass Seed: Grass seed shall be crested wheatgrass var. Nordan. The grass seed shall conform to the\n32 standards for \"Certified\" grade seed or better as outlined by the State of Washington Department of\n33 Agriculture \"Rules for Seed Certification,\" latest edition.\n34 Seed shall be furnished in standard containers on which shall be shown the following information:\n35 Common name of seed.\n36 Lot number.\n37 Net weight.\n38 Percentage of purity.\n39 Percentage of germination.\n40 Percentage of weed seed content and inert material clearly marked in accordance with applicable state\n41 and federal laws.\nAppendix 4D.96\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The maximum allowable noxious weed percentage (by weight) is 0.5 percent. The maximum\n2 allowable inert percentage is 7 percent.\n3 Upon request, the Construction General Contractor shall furnish to the Construction Manager\n4 duplicate copies of a statement signed by the vendor certifying that each lot of seed has been tested by\n5 a recognized seed testing laboratory within 6 months before the date of delivery on the project. Seed,\n6 which has become wet, moldy, or otherwise damaged in transit or storage will not be accepted.\n7 Fertilizer: Fertilizer shall be either fertilizer Type A or fertilizer Type B.\n8 Fertilizer Type A shall be an organic product developed from byproducts of the manufacture of\n9 various antibiotics, enzymes, and proteins. Fertilizer Type A shall provide a slow release of\n10 organically bound nutrients including nitrogen, potassium, and phosphorous. It shall have a\n11 minimum analysis (nutrient ratio) of 7-2-3 (nitrogen-phosphorous-potassium) with pH in the range of\n12 5.3 to 6.0. Fertilizer Type A shall be sterilized and weed free. Fertilizer Type A shall be supplied in\n13 dried, granulated form with the dried weight, contents, and chemical analysis clearly marked on each\n14 bag. One suggested product name for fertilizer Type A is Biosol Mix, Rocky Mountain Bio-Products,\n15 Inc., Edwards, CO.\n16 Fertilizer Type B shall be an organic product manufactured from seedmeal (60 percent), protein-\n17 derived, and fortified with calcium-rich (300 pounds per ton) composted chicken manure. Fertilizer\n18 Type B shall provide a slow release of organically bound nutrients including nitrogen, potassium, and\n19 phosphorous. It shall have a minimum analysis (nutrient ratio) of 6-4-1 (nitrogen-phosphorous-\n20 potassium) with pH in the range of 5.3 to 6.0. Fertilizer Type B shall be biodegradable, nonpolluting,\n21 nonvolatile, nontoxic, sterilized and weed free, and contain no heavy metals or salts. Fertilizer Type B\n22 shall be supplied in dried, pelletized form with the dried weight, contents, and chemical analysis\n23 clearly marked on each container. One suggested product name for fertilizer Type B is Fertile-Fibers\n24 Nutrimulch\", Quattro Environmental, Coronado, CA.\n25 Wood Fiber Mulch: Wood fiber mulch shall be produced from natural or recycled (pulp) fiber, such as\n26 wood chips or similar wood materials, or from newsprint, corrugated cardboard, or a combination of these\n27 processed materials. The fibers shall not contain any rock, metal, or plastic. It shall be suitable for\n28 hydromulching and shall be treated with a nontoxic green dye to facilitate inspection of the placement of\n29 the material. It shall be manufactured in such a manner that after addition and agitation in slurry tanks\n30 with water, the fibers in the material will become uniformly suspended to form a homogenous slurry.\n31 When hydraulically sprayed on the ground, the material shall allow the absorption and percolation of\n32 moisture. The product shall contain less than 250 parts per million boron and shall be nontoxic to plant\n33 and animal life. The organic matter content shall be at least 93 percent on any oven-dry basis as\n34 determined by ASTM D586. The moisture content shall be no more than 15 percent as determined by\n35 oven-dried weight. Each package of the wood fiber mulch shall be marked by the manufacturer to show\n36 the dried weight. Wood fiber mulch shall be added to the tackifier at the rate of 1,500 pounds per acre\n37 minimum.\n38 Straw Mulch: Straw mulch shall be air dried straw free of noxious weeds and other materials\n39 detrimental to plant life. Straw shall be seasoned before baling or loading. Straw mulch so provided shall\n40 be suitable for spreading with mulch blower equipment.\n41 Tackifier: The tackifier shall be an organic guar tackifier derived form natural organic plant sources or a\n42 100 percent polyacrylamide. The tackifier used shall contain no growth or germination inhibiting\n43 materials. The guar based tackifier shall be applied at a rate of 60 pounds per acre minimum. If\n44 polyacrylamide is used as the tackifier instead of guar, it shall be applied at 5 pounds per acre minimum.\n45 Erosion Control Matting:\n46 Erosion control matting shall be used to prevent erosion of soil due primarily to wind. Erosion control\n47 matting shall be a long-life dense matting composed of nylon fiber, polyolefin fiber, or polyester\n48 fibers.\nAppendix 4D.97\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The matting shall be of a consistent thickness with the fiber evenly distributed over the entire area of\n2 the matting. The fibers shall be encased between two layers of heavy polypropylene or polyolefin\n3 netting. The fibers and the netting shall be stitched top to bottom to form a three-dimensional matrix\n4 using polyester or polyolefin thread. All components of the erosion control matting shall be\n5 stabilized against ultraviolet degradation and inert to chemicals normally encountered in a natural soil\n6 environment. The erosion control matting shall have a minimum thickness of 0.5 inch and a\n7 minimum weight of 10 ounces per square yard. Three suggested product names for erosion control\n8 matting are Landlok ECRM 450, Synthetic Industries, Chattanooga, TN; P300, North American\n9 Green, Evansville, IN; and Recylex TRM, American Excelsior Company, Arlington, TX.\n10 Anchorage devices for erosion control matting shall be as recommended by the manufacturer of the\n11 erosion control matting and as approved by the Construction Manager.\n12 Soil Stabilization Cover: Soil stabilization cover shall be applied on the finished grade inside side\n13 slopes of the Phase I excavation to reduce wind and water caused erosion. Soil stabilization cover shall\n14 be a waterborne copolymer emulsion consisting of nonflammable concentrated PVA liquid copolymer\n15 with acrylic base having 60 percent solids. On drying the soil stabilization cover shall from a colorless\n16 transparent net-like film. Such film shall have permeability to allow exchange of air and moisture and\n17 have an effective life of at least 1 year. The copolymer shall not re-emulsify when cured. The liquid\n18 copolymer emulsion shall be nontoxic to plants and animals. One suggested product name for soil\n19 stabilization cover is Marloc, Reclamare Company, Des Moines, WA.\n20 Part 3 -Execution\n21 Placing Topsoil\n22 A 6-inch thick layer of topsoil, or as otherwise ordered by the Construction Manager, shall be evenly\n23 spread over all areas where material has either been excavated from or has been placed in that are to\n24 be seeded, including all borrow areas and permanent stockpiles.\n25 Topsoil shall not be placed when the ground or topsoil is frozen, excessively wet, or in the opinion of\n26 the Construction Manager in a condition detrimental to the work.\n27 Upon physical completion of the work, remaining topsoil shall be stockpiled at the location shown on\n28 the Drawings. The permanent topsoil stockpile shall than be seeded, fertilized, and mulched.\n29 Seeding, Fertilizing, And Mulching\n30 General: Areas to be seeded, fertilized, and mulched are indicated on the Drawings. No seeding,\n31 fertilizing, and mulching shall be done within the Phase I excavation, unless directed otherwise by the\n32 Construction Manager. Areas to be seeded, fertilized, and mulched include at a minimum the east and\n33 west infiltration areas, the berm and ditch located south of the Phase I excavation, soil stockpiles that will\n34 remain after the completion of the construction, and borrow areas. Other areas outside of the Phase 1\n35 excavation that are disturbed by the construction and are not otherwise stabilized shall be seeded,\n36 fertilized, and mulched as directed by the Construction Manager.\n37 Season of Work: Seeding shall be done between September I and March 1. Specific ideal seeding times\n38 within this window shall be as required for proper seedbed preparation.\n39 Weed Control: Areas to be seeded shall be maintained reasonably free of weeds. Weeds shall be kept\n40 from going to seed.\n41 Seedbed Preparation:\n42 Soil shall be tilled to a minimum depth of 6 inches. The seedbed shall be firm below seeding depth\n43 and well pulverized and loose on top. It shall be free of clods and weeds. Tillage shall leave cross-\n44 slope furrows. Seedbed preparation shall not be performed when soil conditions are not suitable for\n45 tilling: too dry, too wet, frozen, etc.\nAppendix 4D.98\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Areas to be seeded that have not either had material excavated from them or placed in them shall not\n2 receive any seedbed preparation unless directed otherwise by the Construction Manager. The\n3 seedbed preparation would destroy any existing soil crust. Existing soil crust provides erosion\n4 protection.\n5 Application of Seed and Fertilizer: Seeding and fertilizing shall be done closely following seedbed\n6 preparation and shall not be done during windy weather or when the ground is frozen or excessively wet.\n7 The Construction General Contractor shall notify the Construction Manager not less than 24 hours in\n8 advance of any seeding operation and shall not begin the work until areas prepared or designated for\n9 seeding have been approved. Following the Construction Manager's approval, seeding of the approved\n10 areas shall begin immediately.\n11 Seed and fertilizer shall be applied by one of the following methods:\n12 Hydroseeding: Use a hydroseeder that utilizes water as the carrying agent, and maintains continuous\n13 agitation through paddle blades. It shall have an operating capacity sufficient to agitate, suspend, and mix\n14 into a homogeneous slurry the specified amount of seed and water or other material. Distribution and\n15 discharge lines shall be large enough to prevent stoppage and shall be equipped with a set of hydraulic\n16 discharge spray nozzles that will provide a uniform distribution of the slurry. Seed and fertilizer may be\n17 applied in one application provided that the fertilizer is placed in the hydroseeder tank no more than I\n18 hour prior to application.\n19 Hand Broadcasting:\n20 Apply fertilizer first. The seed shall be incorporated into the top 1/4 inch of soil by hand raking or\n21 other method that is approved by the Construction Manager.\n22 Wood fiber mulch shall be added as a tracer to visibly aid uniform application. The application rate\n23 of wood fiber mulch used as a tracer shall not exceed 250 pounds per acre.\n24 Seed shall be applied at a rate of 10 to 12 pounds pure live seed per acre. Fertilizer shall be applied at\n25 a rate of 1,000 pounds per acre.\n26 Mulching:\n27 Straw mulch shall be evenly applied at a rate of 1.0 ton per acre within 48 hours after seeding.\n28 Mulching shall not be performed when wind interferes with mulch placement. Distribution of straw\n29 mulch material shall be by means of a mulch spreader that utilizes forced air to blow mulch material\n30 on the seeded areas. In spreading straw mulch, the spreader shall not cut or break the straw into short\n31 stalks. Straw mulch may be spread by hand over areas that were seeded by hand. Straw mulch shall\n32 be crimped into the soil to a depth of 2 inches and with no more than one pass of the equipment.\n33 In areas where it is not possible to crimp the straw mulch into the soil, tackifier shall be applied over\n34 the straw mulch. The method of application for tackifier shall be in accordance with the\n35 manufacturer's instructions. The tackifier application rate shall be as specified herein. Tackifier shall\n36 be sprayed over mulch, seed, and fertilizer. The Construction Manager shall indicate which areas (if\n37 any) shall have the straw mulch held down with tackifier.\n38 Mulching can be accomplished by either hydromulching with wood fiber mulch, or by mulch\n39 spreader (or by hand) with straw mulch. Using hydromulching, wood fiber mulch will be added to the\n40 tackifier at the rate of 1,500 pounds per acre, in addition to the mulch used as tracer for hydroseeding.\n41 Protection: Traffic over seeded areas shall be prohibited.\nAppendix 4D.99\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Installation Warranty:\n2 The warranty period for seeding, fertilizing, and mulching will begin upon the date of acceptance of\n3 the completed installation. The installation shall be considered complete by the Construction\n4 Manager upon satisfactory completion of the initial inspection, which is described below. Acceptance\n5 will be certified in writing by the Construction Manager.\n6 Seeded areas shall be guaranteed by the Construction General Contractor for a period of 1 year.\n7 Mulch coverage will be used to evaluate the materials and workmanship of the application of seed,\n8 fertilizer, and mulch. Seed, fertilizer, and mulch will be reapplied one time only as directed by the\n9 Construction Manager at the Construction General Contractor's expense in areas where the coverage\n10 does not meet the following criteria. Three inspections of mulch coverage will occur:\n11 Initial inspection will occur between 1 to 3 business days following completion of the installation for\n12 the purposed of Construction Manager acceptance. Mulch coverage must equal 100 percent of the\n13 area over which it was spread before Construction Manager acceptance will occur.\n14 Mulch coverage will be inspected 60 days after Construction Manager acceptance at which time\n15 mulch coverage must equal 100 percent of the area over which it was spread.\n16 A final inspection will occur 30 days prior to the end of the warranty period. At this time, mulch\n17 coverage must equal at least 80 percent of the area over which it was spread.\n18 Placing Erosion Control Matting\n19 Erosion control matting shall be installed in the locations shown on the Plans and as directed by the\n20 Construction Manager. The erosion control matting shall be securely anchored to resist the wind.\n21 The erosion control matting shall be installed following the manufacturer's recommendations and the\n22 following minimum requirements. Where more than one strip of erosion control matting is required,\n23 it shall overlap the adjacent matting a minimum of 6 inches. The ends of the erosion control matting\n24 shall overlap a minimum of 6 inches with the uphill section on top.\n25 Placing Soil Stabilization Cover\n26 Soil stabilization cover shall be applied with hydroseeding equipment in two passes of opposite\n27 directions. Copolymer shall be applied at a minimum rate of 200 gallons per acre; dilution rate for\n28 copolymer and water shall be per the manufacturer's recommendation. Wood fiber mulch shall be\n29 added as a tracer to visibly aid uniform application. The application rate of wood fiber mulch used as\n30 a tracer shall not exceed 250 pounds per acre.\n31 Soil stabilization cover shall be applied when adequate weather conditions for proper curing, as\n32 determined by the manufacturer, are anticipated. The Construction General Contractor shall apply\n33 soil stabilization cover only to finish graded areas unless directed otherwise by Construction\n34 Manager.\n35 END OF SECTION 02920\nAppendix 4D.100\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nDIVISION 3-CONCRETE\nAppendix 4D.101\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI SECTION 03301 -CONCRETE SCHED. A & B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 Work Included\n4 This section is a ready-mix concrete and reinforcing bar specification for concrete.\n5 References\n6 The following is a list of standards, which may be referenced in this section:\n7 AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE (ACI)\n8 ACI 117 Standard Specifications for Tolerances for Concrete Construction and Materials\n9 ACI 301 Specifications for Structural Concrete for Buildings\n10 ACI 305R Hot Weather Concreting\n11 ACI 306.1 Standard Specification for Cold Weather Concreting\n12 ACI 318/318R Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete\n13 ACI 347 Formwork for Concrete\n14 AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS (ASTM)\n15 ASTM A 185 Standard Specification for Steel Welded Wire Fabric, Plain, for Concrete\n16 Reinforcement.\n17 ASTM A615 Standard Specification for Deformed and Plain Billet-Steel Bars for Concrete\n18 Reinforcement.\n19 ASTM C31 Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Field.\n20 ASTM C33 Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates.\n21 ASTM C39 Standard Test Methods for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens.\n22 ASTM C94 Standard Specification for Ready-Mix Concrete.\n23 ASTM C150 Standard Specification for Portland Cement.\n24 ASTM C260 Standard Specification for Air-Entraining Admixtures for Concrete.\n25 ASTM C309 Standard Specification for Liquid Membrane-Forming Compounds for Curing\n26 Concrete.\n27 ASTM C494 Standard Specification for Chemical Admixtures for Concrete.\n28 ASTM C618 Standard Specification for Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use as\n29 a Mineral Admixture in Portland Cement Concrete.\n30 ASTM D994 Standard Specification for Preformed Expansion Joint Filler for Concrete\n31 (Bituminous Type).\n32 CONCRETE REINFORCING STEEL INSTITUTE (CRSI)\n33 CRSI Manual of Standard Practice.\n34 Recommended Practice for Placing Reinforcing Bars.\n35 1997 UNIFORM BUILDING CODE (UBC)\n36 Submittals-Approval Required\n37 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\nAppendix 4D. 102\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Shop Drawings:\n2 Reinforcing steel in accordance with CRSI Manual of Standard Practice and ACI SP-66, Detailing\n3 Manual.\n4 Curing compound data.\n5 Complete data on the concrete mix, including aggregate gradations and admixtures, in accordance\n6 with ASTM C94.\n7 Statement identifying aggregates reactivity.\n8 Concrete mix design signed by a qualified mix designer that is a licensed professional engineer in the\n9 State of Washington.\n10 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n11 Information/Record (IR):\n12 Qualifications of independent qualified testing laboratory for concrete construction quality control.\n13 Manufacturer's application instructions for curing compound.\n14 Statement for batch plant currently certified by the National Ready Mixed Concrete Association. If\n15 batch plant cannot be certified, then Construction General Contractor shall demonstrate to the\n16 Construction Manager's satisfaction by providing additional testing as determined by the\n17 Construction Manager such that the concrete may be determined to be acceptable. These test results\n18 shall be submitted to Construction Manager.\n19 Certification for proper functioning of concrete transport trucks including blades, drum rotators,\n20 counters, and other components. Certification shall be acceptable only for concrete batch plants\n21 certified by the National Ready Mixed Concrete Association. Batch plants that are not certified shall\n22 require concrete transport trucks to undergo independent assessment to the satisfaction of the\n23 Construction Manager.\n24 Ready-mix delivery tickets for each truck in accordance with ASTM C94.\n25 Concrete crack repair epoxy injection statement of qualifications for manufacturer's site\n26 representative, injector applicator, and injector pump operating technician. Submit only if crack\n27 repair is required.\n28 Pour slip shall be required prior to any concrete placement to serve as a checklist between the\n29 Construction Manager and the Construction General Contractor. This checklist will be used to\n30 document Construction General Contractor's readiness for concrete placement. Pour slip form shall\n31 be provided to the Construction General Contractor from the Construction Manager.\n32 Results of construction quality control testing.\n33 Environmental Requirements\n34 Do not place concrete when the ambient temperature is below 40 degrees F or approaching\n35 40 degrees F and air temperature less than 40 degrees F for the first 7 days, without special protection\n36 to keep concrete above 40 degrees F.\n37 Do not use curing compound where solvents in the curing compounds are prohibited by state or\n38 federal air quality laws.\n39 Form sealer shall be a ready-to-use water based material formulated to reduce or eliminate surface\n40 imperfections, containing no mineral oil or organic solvents. Environmentally safe, meeting local,\n41 state, and federal regulations.\n42 Part 2 -Products\n43 Form Materials\n44 All formwork shall conform.to the guidelines in ACI 347.\nAppendix 4D.103\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Forms for Exposed Finish Concrete:\n2 Provide continuous, straight, smooth, exposed surfaces. Furnish in largest practicable sizes to\n3 minimize number ofjoints. Provide form material with sufficient thickness to withstand pressure of\n4 newly-placed concrete without visible bow or deflection:\n5 Plywood shall comply with American Plywood Association, grade \"EXT-DFPA PLYFORM\" or\n6 better.\n7 Forms for Unexposed Finish Concrete: Form concrete surfaces, which will be, unexposed in finished\n8 structure with plywood, lumber, or metal.\n9 Form Coatings: Provide commercial formulation form-coating compounds that will not bond with, stain\n10 nor adversely affect concrete surfaces, and will not impair subsequent treatments of concrete surfaces.\n11 Form Ties:\n12 Steel form ties with conical or spherical spreader insert that will leave no metal closer than 1 inch to\n13 concrete surface after tie ends are removed. Wire ties shall not be used.\n14 Water stop ties shall be perpendicular to water stop and symmetrical about the center of tie and\n15 designed to prevent rotation or disturbance of center portion of tie during removal of ends and to\n16 prevent water leaking along the tie. Maximum spacing shall be 12 inches, and all corners shall be\n17 tied.\n18 Concrete Materials\n19 Portland Cement: Cement shall conform to ASTM C150, Type I-II. The cement shall contain no more\n20 than 0.60 percent by weight of alkalies calculated as (Na20 + 0.658 K20).\n21 Pozzolans: Pozzolans (fly ash) shall conform to ASTM C618 Class C or Class F, except that the loss on\n22 ignition (LOI) shall be less than 2 percent.\n23 Aggregate: Fine and coarse aggregate shall conform to ASTM C33. Maximum coarse aggregate size\n24 shall conform to ACI 318, paragraph 3.3.2. Unless otherwise specified, maximum aggregate size shall be\n25 1-1/2 inches. Aggregate shall be nonpotentially reactive in accordance with ASTM C33, Appendix XI,\n26 paragraph X1.1.\n27 Mixing Water: Potable having no pronounced taste or odor, and containing no deleterious materials.\n28 Air-Entraining Agents (AEA): ASTM C260.\n29 Water-Reducing Admixtures: If water-reducing admixtures are used, they shall conform to ASTM\n30 C494, Type A, and contain no more than 1 percent chloride ions.\n31 Calcium Chloride: Calcium chloride is not permitted.\n32 Reinforcing Steel\n33 Deformed Bars: ASTM A615, Grade 60. Welding of reinforcing shall not be permitted.\n34 Supports for Reinforcement: Provide supports for reinforcement including bolsters, chairs, spacers, and\n35 other devices for spacing, supporting and fastening reinforcing in place. Use wire bar type supports\n36 complying with CRSI recommendations, or approved substitute. Use supports with sand plates or\n37 horizontal runners where base material will not support chair legs. Pumice blocks, adobe, bricks, rocks,\n38 etc. are not acceptable for rebar or wire mesh supports.\n39 Ancillary Materials\n40 Concrete Crack Repair Epoxy Injection Manufacturers:\n41 Contech Group, Seattle, WA, or Portland, OR.\n42 Sika Group, Lindhurst, NJ.\nAppendix 4D. 104\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Euclid Chemical Co., Cleveland, OH.\n2 Expansion Joint Filler: ASTM D994, 1/2 inch thick, or as shown.\n3 Nonshrink Grout:\n4 Color: To match concrete.\n5 Manufacturers and Products\n6 Master Builder Co., Cleveland, OH; Master Flow 928.\n7 Euclid Chemical Co., Cleveland, OH; Hi-flow Grout.\n8 Curing Compound:\n9 Material: Water-based curing compound in accordance with ASTM C309, Type I or Type ID, with\n10 additional requirement that the moisture loss not exceed 0.040 gram per centimeter squared per 72 hours.\n11 Manufacturers and Products:\n12 Master Builders Co.; Masterkure 200W.\n13 Euclid Chemical Co.; Super Diamond Clear Vox.\n14 Water Stop: Extruded elastomeric plastic compound with basic resin to be polyvinyl chloride.\n15 Manufacturers and Products:\n16 Vinylex Corp., Knoxville, TN; Catalog No. 03250/VIN, RB6-38H.\n17 A. C. Horn, Inc., Beltsville, MD; Catalog No. CSP-162, Type 9 (6-inch by 3/8-inch).\n18 Hydrophilic Water Stop: Material shall be a non-bentonite hydrophilic rubber compound. Material\n19 shall be a combination of chloroprene rubber and chloroprene rubber modified to impart hydrophilic\n20 properties.\n21 Manufacturers and Products:\n22 Greenstreak Plastic Products, St. Louis, MO; Hydrotite CJ-1020-K with Leakmaster LV-1 adhesive\n23 and sealant.\n24 Adeka Ultra Seal, JLM Associates, Spearfish, SD; MC-2010M with 3M-2141 adhesive and P-201\n25 sealant.\n26 Red Coloring for Electrical Duct Encasement: Commercial grade red iron oxide, 3 pounds per sack of\n27 cement.\n28 Concrete Slab Coating\n29 As specified in Section 09900, PAINT COATING SYSTEMS.\n30 Proportioning and Design of Mixes\n31 Mix Design: Prepare design mixes for each type and strength of concrete by either laboratory trial batch\n32 or field experience methods as specified in ACI 318 and 1997 UBC. The more stringent requirements of\n33 ACI 318 and 1997 UBC shall apply. Existing mix design test records shall be acceptable only if the\n34 facility is certified by National Ready Mixed Concrete Association. Uncertified concrete batch plant shall\n35 require testing from a qualified independent testing agency to develop the test and number of tests for an\n36 acceptable standard deviation to be developed.\n37 Design mixes to provide normal weight concrete with the following specified 28-day compressive\n38 strengths, minimum, as indicated on drawings and schedules:\n39 Class 30: 3,000 psi (non-structural concrete elements such as sidewalks, guard posts, fences, post and\n40 pole foundations, conduit encasement, and thrust blocks).\nAppendix 4D.105\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Class 40: 4,000 psi (structural concrete).\n2 Class 50: 5,000 psi (truck loading pad).\n3 See CONSTRUCTION QUALITY CONTROL of this specification for acceptance criteria.\n4 Concrete mixes incorporating pozzolan (fly ash) shall contain a minimum of 15 percent fly ash by\n5 weight and the maximum 25 percent fly ash of the total cementitious materials.\n6 Class 40 and Class 50 air content shall be 4 to 6 percent when tested in accordance with ASTM C23 1.\n7 Follow manufacturer's recommendations for addition of water reducers.\n8 Class 40 and Class 50: Concrete shall be air-entrained and shall incorporate the usage of high-range\n9 water reducer. Concrete mix design shall contain fly ash. Add air entraining agent (AEA) at the\n10 manufacturer's prescribed rate to result in concrete at point of placement having air content complying\n11 with ACI 301.\n12 Unless specifically stated otherwise, water-cement ratio (or water-cement plus fly ash ratio) shall control\n13 amount of total water added to concrete as follows:\nWater-Cement Ratio Maximum W/C Ratio Maximum W/C Ratio\nCoarse Aggregate Size wlSuperplasticizer w/o Superplasticizer\n1-1/2\" 0.40 0.45\n1\" 0.40 0.45\n3/4\" 0.40 0.45\n14 Slump Range at Site(Class 40 and Class 50):\n15 4-1/2 inches minimum, 8 inches maximum for concrete with a high range water reducing admixture.\n16 3 inches minimum and 5 inches maximum for concrete without high range water reducing admixture.\nAppendix 4D.106\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Combined Aggregate Gradation:\n2 Select one of the gradations shown in the following table.\nCombined Gradation Limits shown are for coarse aggregates and fine aggregates\nLimits: mixed together (combined).\nCombined Gradation\nPercentage Passing\nSieve Sizes 1-1/2\" Max. 1\" Max. 3/4\" Max.\n2\" -100 - -\n1-1/2\" 95-100 -100 -\n1\" 65- 85 90-100 -100\n3/4\" 55- 75 70-90 92-100\n1/2\" - - 68-86\n3/8\" 40-55 45-65 57-74\nNo. 4 30-45 31 -47 38-57\nNo. 8 23 -38 23-40 28-46\nNo. 16 16-30 17-35 20-36\nNo. 30 10-20 10-23 14-25\nNo.50 4-10 2-10 5-14\nNo. 100 0-3 0-3 0-5\nNo.200 0-2 0-2 0-2\n3 Minimum Cement Content (or Combined Cement Plus Fly Ash Content When Fly Ash is Used):\n4 517 pounds per cubic yard for concrete with 1-1/2-inch maximum size aggregate.\n5 540 pounds per cubic yard for 1-inch maximum size aggregate.\n6 564 pounds per cubic yard for 3/4-inch maximum size aggregate.\n7 Increase cement content or combined cement plus fly ash content, as required to meet strength\n8 requirements and water-cement ratio.\n9 Mixing And Delivery (Class 40 and Class 50)\n10 The manufacture and delivery of all concrete shall conform to ASTM C94 except as modified herein.\n11 Hand-mixed concrete is prohibited.\n12 When concrete arrives at the jobsite with slump below that suitable for placing, as indicated by the\n13 Specification, water may be added only if the maximum permissible water-cement ratio and the\n14 maximum permissible slump is not exceeded. Any water thus added to bring the slump within\n15 required limits shall be injected in such a manner that uniformity requirements are met. Water shall\n16 be incorporated by additional mixing equal to at least half of the total mixing required or 30 drum\n17 revolutions at rated mixing speed, whichever is more. Additional AEA may be introduced during this\n18 mixing period if necessary to meet Specifications. Neither water nor AEA shall be added to the batch\n19 at any later time.\n20 Concrete uniformity shall meet the requirements of ASTM C94 except as modified herein. After final\n21 mixing is complete, visible lumps, nonconformance to uniformity requirements, or failure to meet\n22 specified slump, entrained air, and temperature requirements shall be considered cause for rejecting\n23 the remainder of the load. In addition, failure of the ready-mix truck drum to meet uniformity\n24 requirements will be deemed cause for rejection of the mixing equipment until adequate repairs have\n25 been made.\nAppendix 4D.107\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Discharge of the concrete shall be completed within 1-1/2 hours, or before the drum has revolved\n2 300 revolutions, whichever comes first, after the introduction of mixing water to the cement and\n3 aggregates unless special approved time delay admixtures are used. Coordinate time delay admixture\n4 information with manufacturer and Construction Manager prior to placing concrete. In hot weather or\n5 under conditions contributing to quick stiffening of the concrete a time limit less than 1-1/2 hours\n6 may be designated by the Construction General Contractor.\n7 Additional high-range water-reducing admixtures (superplasticizer) may be added to the mixer at the\n8 jobsite using manufacturer-approved dispensing when unexpected delays cause too great of slump\n9 loss.\n10 Concrete that is rejected for failure to meet any of the above requirements will be evaluated by the\n11 Engineer and may be removed and replaced at the expense of the Construction General Contractor.\n12 Hot or Cold Weather Concreting: Methods and means of batching, mixing, and delivery of concrete in\n13 hot or cold weather shall comply with ACI 305R or ACI 306.1.\n14 Part 3 -Execution\n15 Formwork\n16 Unless otherwise shown on the drawings, all forms shall be straight and plumb, rigid and mortar tight.\n17 All forms shall be braced, tied, and supported sufficiently to maintain their required position during\n18 and after the placing of concrete. Joints shall be sufficiently tight to prevent mortar leakage. Where\n19 shown on the Drawings, embedded items shall be placed in forms to shape edges or surfaces to that of\n20 the concrete members. All formwork shall conform to the guidelines in ACI 347.\n21 All exposed comers of concrete shall be chamfered 3/4 inch.\n22 Form Removal:\n23 Formwork Not Supporting Weight of Concrete: This formwork may be removed after cumulatively\n24 curing at not less than 50 degrees F for 32 hours after placing concrete, provided concrete is sufficiently\n25 hard not to be damaged by form removal or subsequent operations. Curing must then continue through\n26 the minimum curing period.\n27 Formwork Supporting Weight of Concrete: This formnwork may not be removed until concrete has\n28 attained its 28-day design compressive strength, except as permitted under \"Early Loading of New\n29 Concrete\" as specified below.\n30 Early Loading of New Concrete: Early loading of concrete structures shall comply with requirements\n31 of ACI 318, Section 6.2. When construction loading is proposed before concrete has achieved its 28-day\n32 design strength, structural calculations and concrete strength test data shall be submitted and approved by\n33 the Construction Manager prior to loading.\n34 Form Sealer:\n35 Material: Surface sealer will not bond with, stain, or adversely affect concrete surfaces, and will not\n36 impair subsequent treatments of concrete surfaces when applied to forms.\n37 Manufacturers and Products:\n38 Master Builders, Inc.; Rheofinish.\n39 Burke Chemicals; Burke Release No. 1.\n40 Placing Reinforcing Steel:\n41 Unless otherwise specified, place reinforcing steel in accordance with CRSI Recommended Practice\n42 for Placing Reinforcing Bars and ACI 301.\nAppendix 4D. 108\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Splicinq:\n2 Follow ACI 318/318R.\n3 Use lap splices, unless otherwise shown or permitted in writing by Engineer.\n4 Stagger splices in adjacent bars where indicated.\n5 Placinq Concrete\n6 Place concrete in accordance with ACI 301.\n7 Prior to placing concrete, remove water from excavation and debris and foreign material from forms.\n8 Check reinforcing steel for proper placement and correct discrepancies.\n9 Before depositing new concrete on old concrete, clean surface using sandblast or bushhammer or\n10 other mechanical means to obtain a 1/4-inch rough profile, and pour a cement-sand grout to minimum\n11 depth of 1/2-inch over the surface. Proportion 1 part cement to 2.5 parts sand by weight.\n12 Place concrete as soon as possible after leaving mixer, without segregation or loss of ingredients,\n13 without splashing forms or steel above, and in layers not over 2 feet deep. Place within 1-1/2 hours\n14 after adding cement to mix.\n15 Eight feet maximum vertical drop to final placement, when not guided with chutes or other devices to\n16 prevent segregation due to impact with reinforcing.\n17 Concrete shall be placed near its final location to avoid segregation.\n18 Cold Weather Placing: Protect concrete work from damage or reduced strength, which could be caused\n19 by frost, freezing, or low temperatures, in compliance with ACI 306.1 and as specified herein. Minimum\n20 concrete temperature as placed and maintained shall be 55 degrees F, or as required by ACI-306.1,\n21 Table 3.2.1.\n22 Hot Weather Placing:\n23 When hot weather conditions that would seriously impair quality and strength of concrete exist, place\n24 concrete in compliance with ACI 305 and as specified herein:\n25 Cool mixing drum and/or ingredients before mixing to maintain concrete temperature below\n26 90 degrees F at time of placement.\n27 Compaction\n28 Vibrate concrete as follows:\n29 Apply approved vibrator at points spaced not farther apart than vibrator's effective radius.\n30 Apply close enough to forms to vibrate surface effectively but not damage form surfaces.\n31 Vibrate until concrete becomes uniformly plastic.\n32 Vibrator must penetrate fresh placed concrete and into previous layer of fresh concrete below.\n33 Vibrator shall not be used to move concrete.\n34 Construction Joints\n35 Locate as shown or as approved.\n36 Provide waterstops in construction joints as indicated and with other Construction General\n37 Contractor-required construction joints that is approved by the Engineer.\n38 Maximum Spacing Between Construction Joints: 40 feet.\n39 Installation of Embedded Items\n40 Set and build into work anchorage devices and other embedded items required for other work that is\n41 attached to, or supported by cast-in-place concrete. Secure all such items firmly in position.\nAppendix 4D.109\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Finishing\n2 Floor Slabs and Tops of Walls:\n3 Finish slabs to grades shown on Drawings.\n4 Screed surfaces to true level planes.\n5 After initial water has been absorbed, float with wood float and trowel with steel trowel to smooth\n6 finish free from trowel marks.\n7 Do not absorb wet spots with neat cement.\n8 Unexposed Slab Surfaces: Screed to true surface, bull float with wood float, and wood trowel to seal\n9 surface. Finish surfaces to grades shown on Drawings.\n10 Tolerances: Floors shall not vary from level or true plane more than 1/4-inch (plus or minus) in 10 feet\n11 when measured with a straightedge. Floors shall conform to grades shown on Drawings. Conform to\n12 ACI 117.\n13 Exterior Slabs and Sidewalks:\n14 Bull float with wood float, wood trowel, and lightly trowel with steel trowel.\n15 Finish with broom to obtain nonskid surface.\n16 Finish exposed edges with steel edging tool.\n17 Mark walks transversely at 5-foot intervals withjointing tool.\n18 Finishing And Patching Formed Surfaces\n19 Smooth Form Finish (SmFm):\n20 Provide as-cast smooth form finish for formed concrete surfaces that are exposed to view, or that are\n21 covered with a coating material applied directly to concrete, or a covering material bonded to\n22 concrete such as waterproofing, damp proofing, painting, or other similar system.\n23 Produce smooth form finish (SmFm) by selecting form material to impart a smooth, hard, uniform\n24 texture and arranging them orderly and symmetrically with a minimum of seams. Repair and patch\n25 defective areas with fins or other projections completely removed and smoothed.\n26 Cut out honeycombed and defective areas.\n27 Cut edges perpendicular to surface at least 1 inch deep. Do not feather edges. Soak area with water\n28 for 24 hours.\n29 Patch with nonshrink grout.\n30 Finish surfaces to match adjacent concrete.\n31 Keep patches damp for minimum 7 days or spray with curing compound to minimize shrinking.\n32 Fill form tie holes with Nonshrink Grout.\n33 Concrete Protection And Curing\n34 General:\n35 Protect freshly placed concrete from injurious action by sun, rain, wind, flowing water, mechanical\n36 injury, and premature drying for not less than seven (7) consecutive days after placement.\n37 Protect concrete against damage from frost or freezing for a minimum of 3 days. Provisions of ACI\n38 306.1 shall apply for cold weather unless otherwise specified.\n39 Remove and replace concrete damaged by freezing.\n40 Curing Methods: Perform curing of concrete by one or more of the following methods:\n41\nAppendix 4D.1 10\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Moist Curing: Cover concrete surfaces with moisture retaining cover for curing period. Exposed\n2 horizontal concrete surfaces may be covered with sand or other approved material and kept wet for the\n3 required period. Wood forms shall be kept sufficiently wet at all times to prevent the forms from\n4 separating at the joints and the concrete from drying.\n5 Membrane Curing: Concrete surfaces to receive membrane curing shall be treated with a curing\n6 compound as specified or otherwise approved. The curing compound shall be applied in strict accordance\n7 with the directions of the manufacturer of the compound.\n8 Temperature, Wind, and Humidity:\n9 Cold Weather:\n10 When the mean daily outdoor temperature is less than 40 degrees F, the temperature of the concrete\n11 surface shall be maintained between 55 and 90 degrees F for the required curing period. When\n12 necessary, arrangements for heating, covering, insulating, or housing the concrete work shall be made\n13 in advance of placement and shall be adequate to maintain the required temperature without injury\n14 due to concentration of heat. Combustion heaters shall not be used during the first 24 hours unless\n15 precautions are taken to prevent exposure of the concrete to exhaust gases that contain carbon\n16 dioxide. If early loading is anticipated during cold weather, provide temperature protection to ensure\n17 necessary strength development.\n18 The concrete surface temperature requirements (based on section thickness) in ACI 306.1 may be\n19 used in lieu of the 55 degrees F minimum specified before.\n20 If concrete surface temperatures as measured by the inspecting agency are below the minimum curing\n21 temperature but meet the freeze protection requirements, the concrete curing period shall be extended\n22 to ensure adequate strength is developed. The extension time shall be at least equivalent to the time\n23 period in which temperatures were too low.\n24 Hot Weather: The concrete surfaces shall be kept below 100 degrees F for the curing period. When\n25 necessary, provision for windbreaks, shading, fog spraying, sprinkling, ponding, or wet covering with a\n26 light colored material shall be made in advance of placement, and such protective measures shall be taken\n27 as quickly as concrete hardening and finishing operations will allow.\n28 Rate of Temperature Change:\n29 Changes in temperature of the air immediately adjacent to the concrete during and immediately\n30 following the curing period shall be kept as uniform as possible and shall not exceed 5 degrees F in\n31 any 1-hour or 50 degree F in any 24-hour period.\n32 Use curing compound only where approved by Construction Manager. Cure formed surfaces with\n33 curing compound applied in accordance with manufacturer's directions as soon as forms are removed\n34 and finishing is completed.\n35 Water Stops: Plastic and Hydrophilic\n36 Install in accordance with manufacturer's instructions.\n37 Repairing Concrete Cracks\n38 Cracks requiring repair shall be determined by the Engineer and shall be repaired using epoxy injection.\n39 Method of epoxy injection shall be approved by the Construction Manager prior to application.\n40\nAppendix 4D.1 11\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Construction Quality Control\n2 Construction General Contractor Supplied Testing: The Construction General Contractor shall\n3 provide the necessary testing and monitoring services for the following:\n4 Construction General Contractor shall procure the services of a qualified independent testing\n5 laboratory to control or monitor the production, transportation, placement, protection, curing, or\n6 temperature of the concrete as specified herein. Construction General Contractor shall submit\n7 qualifications of independent testing laboratory.\n8 Evaluation of Concrete Field Strength:\n9 Provide adequate facilities for safe storage and proper curing of concrete test cylinders onsite for first\n10 24 hours, and for additional time as may be required before transporting to test lab.\n11 Provide concrete for testing of slump, air content, and for making cylinders from the point of\n12 discharge into forms. When concrete is pumped, Samples used shall be taken from discharge end of\n13 pump hose.\n14 Evaluation will be in accordance with ACI 301, Chapter 17, and Specifications.\n15 Specimens shall be made, cured, and tested in accordance with ASTM C31 and ASTM C39.\n16 Pumped Concrete: Take concrete samples for slump (ASTM C143) and test cylinders (ASTM C31\n17 and C39).\n18 Reject concrete represented by cylinders failing to meet strength and air content specified. For Class\n19 30 concrete, reject concrete represented by cylinders failing to meet strength specified.\n20 END OF SECTION 03301\nAppendix 4D.112\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nDIVISION 4-MASONRY (NOT USED)\nAppendix 4D. 113\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nDIVISION 5-METALS\nAppendix 4D.114\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 05500 -METAL FABRICATIONS AND CASTINGS SCHED. A & B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 References\n4 The following is a list of standards, which may be referenced in this section:\n5 THE ALUMINUM ASSOCIATION, INC. (AA)\n6 The Aluminum Design Manual\n7 AMERICAN GALVANIZERS ASSOCIATION (AGA)\n8 Inspection of Products Hot-Dip Galvanized After Fabrication\n9 AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION (AISC)\n10 AISC S329 Allowable Stress Design Specification for Structural Joints using\n11 ASTM A325 or A490 Bolts\n12 AMERICAN IRON AND STEEL INSTITUTE (AISI)\n13 Stainless Steel Types\n14 AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANSI)\n15 ANSI A10.11 Safety Requirements for Personnel and Debris Nets\n16 ANSI A14.3 Ladders -Fixed -Safety Requirements\n17 ANSI B 1.1 Unified-inch Screw Threads (UN and UNR Thread Form)\n18 AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY (AWS)\n19 AWS D1.1 Structural Welding Code -Steel\n20 AWS D1.2 Structural Welding Code -Aluminum\n21 AWS DI.6 Structural Welding Code -Stainless Steel\n22 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n23 ASTM A36/A36M Specification for Carbon Structural Steel\n24 ASTM A48 Specification for Gray Iron Castings\n25 ASTM A53/A53M Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Welded\n26 and Seamless\n27 ASTM A108 Specification for Steel Bars, Carbon, Cold-Finished, Standard Quality\n28 ASTM A123/A123M Specification for Zinc (Hot-Dip Galvanized) Coatings on Iron and Steel\n29 Products\n30 ASTM A 143 Practice for Safeguarding Against Embrittlement of Hot-Dip Galvanized\n31 Structural Steel Products and Procedure for Detecting Embrittlement\n32 ASTM A153/Al53M Specification for Zinc Coating (Hot-Dip) on Iron and Steel Hardware\n33 ASTM A193/A193M Specification for Alloy-Steel and Stainless Steel Bolting Materials for\n34 High-Temperature Service\n35 ASTM Al94/Al94M Specification for Carbon and Alloy Steel Nuts for Bolts for High-Pressure\n36 or High-Temperature Service, or Both\n37 ASTM A240/A240M Specification for Heat-Resisting Chromium and Chromium-Nickel\n38 Stainless Steel Plate, Sheet, and Strip for Pressure Vessels\nAppendix 4D. 115\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 ASTM A276 Specification for Stainless Steel Bars and Shapes\n2 ASTM A278 Specification for Gray Iron Castings for Pressure-Containing Parts for\n3 Temperatures Up to 650 Degree\n4 ASTM A283/A283M Specification for Low and Intermediate Tensile Strength Carbon Steel\n5 Plates\n6 ASTM A307 Specification for Carbon Steel Bolts and Studs, 60,000 PSI Tensile\n7 ASTM A325 Specification for Structural Bolts, Steel, Heat Treated 120/105 ksi\n8 Minimum Tensile Strength\n9 ASTM A380 Practice for Cleaning, Descaling, and Passivation of Stainless Steel Parts,\n10 Equipment, and Systems\n11 ASTM A384 Practice for Safeguarding Against Warpage and Distortion During Hot-Dip\n12 Galvanizing of Steel Assemblies\n13 ASTM A385 Practice for Providing High-Quality Zinc Coatings (Hot-Dip)\n14 ASTM A489 Specification for Carbon Steel Lifting Eyes\n15 ASTM A500 Specification for Cold-Formed Welded and Seamless Carbon Steel\n16 Structural Tubing in Rounds and Shapes\n17 ASTM A501 Specification for Hot-Formed Welded and Seamless Carbon Steel\n18 Structural Tubing\n19 ASTM A563 Specification for Carbon and Alloy Steel Nuts\n20 ASTM A653 Specification for Steel Sheet, Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) or Zinc-Iron\n21 Alloy-Coated (Galvannealed) by the Hot-Dip Process\n22 ASTM A780 Practice for Repair of Damaged and Uncoated Areas of Hot-Dip\n23 Galvanized Coatings\n24 ASTM A786/A786M Specification for Hot-Rolled Carbon, Low-Alloy, High-Strength Low-\n25 Alloy, and Alloy Steel Floor Plates\n26 ASTM A793 Specification for Rolled Floor Plate, Stainless Steel\n27 ASTM A967 Specification for Chemical Passivation Treatments for Stainless Steel Parts\n28 ASTM A992/A992M Specification for Steel for Structural Shapes for Use in Building Framing\n29 ASTM B209 Specification for Aluminum and Aluminum-Alloy Sheet and Plate\n30 ASTM B308/B308M Specification for Aluminum-Alloy 606 1-T6 Standard Structural Profiles\n31 ASTM B429 Specification for Aluminum-Alloy Extruded Structural Pipe and Tube\n32 ASTM B632/B632M Specification for Aluminum-Alloy Rolled Tread Plate\n33 ASTM D1056 Specification for Flexible Cellular Materials -Sponge or Expanded Rubber\n34 ASTM F436 Specification for Hardened Steel Washers\n35 ASTM F468 Specification for Nonferrous Bolts, Hex Cap Screws, and Studs for General\n36 Use\n37 ASTM F593 Specification for Stainless Steel Bolts, Hex Cap Screws, and Studs\n38 ASTM F594 Specification for Stainless Steel Nuts\n39 ASTM F844 Specification for Washers, Steel, Plain (Flat), Unhardened for General Use\nAppendix 4D. 1 6\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 ASTM F1554 Specification for Anchor Bolts, Steel, 36, 55, and 105-ksi Yield Strength\n2 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS (ICBO)\n3 Evaluation Reports for Concrete and Masonry Anchors\n4 OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION (OSHA)\n5 29 CFR 1910.27 Fixed Ladders\n6 29 CFR 1926.105 Safety Nets\n7 29 CFR 1926.502 Fall Protection Systems Criteria and Practices\n8 SPECIALTY STEEL INDUSTRY OF NORTH AMERICA (SSINA)\n9 Specifications for Stainless Steel\n10 Design Guidelines for the Selection and Use of Stainless Steel\n11 Stainless Steel Fabrication\n12 Stainless Steel Fasteners\n13 Definitions\n14 Submerged: Location at or below top of wall of open water-holding structure, such as a basin or\n15 channel, or wall, ceiling or floor surface inside a covered water-holding structure, or exterior belowgrade\n16 wall or roof surface of water-holding structure, open or covered.\n17 Exterior Area: Location not protected from the weather by a building or other enclosed structure.\n18 Interior Wet Area: Location inside building or structure where floor is sloped to a sump, floor drains or\n19 gutters and is subject to liquid spills or washdown, or where wall, floor, or roof slab is common to a\n20 water-holding or earth-retaining structure.\n21 Interior Dry Area: Location inside building or structure where floor is not subject to liquid spills or\n22 washdown, nor where wall or roof slab is common to a water-holding or earth-retaining structure.\n23 Corrosive Area: Containment area or area exposed to delivery, storage, transfer, or use of chemicals.\n24 Submiftals-Approval Required\n25 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n26 Shop Drawings:\n27 Metal fabrications, including welding, shop and field weld WPSs, PQRs, and fastener information.\n28 Specific instructions for concrete anchor installation, including drilled hole size, preparation,\n29 placement, procedures, and instructions for safe handling of anchoring systems.\n30 Submit source quality control data specified herein.\n31 Samples: Color samples of abrasive stair nosings.\n32 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n33 Information/Record (IR):\n34 Concrete and Masonry Drilled Anchors:\n35 Manufacturer's product description and installation procedures.\n36 ICBO evaluation report.\n37 Adhesive Anchor Installer Certification.\nAppendix 4D. 117\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Welding:\n2 WPSs and WPQs.\n3 CWI credentials and CWI reports.\n4 Welding documentation.\n5 U-Channel Concrete Inserts:\n6 Manufacturer's product description.\n7 Allowable load tables.\n8 Ladders:\n9 Certification of load and fatigue tests.\n10 Passivation method for stainless steel members.\n11 Documentation of construction quality control inspections specified herein.\n12 Qualifications\n13 Adhesive Anchor Installers: Trained and certified by manufacturer.\n14 Galvanized Coating Applicator: Company specializing in hot-dip galvanizing after fabrication and\n15 following procedures of Quality Assurance Manual of the American Galvanizers Association.\n16 Welding: WPSs and WPQs in accordance with AWS D1. 1.\n17 Delivery, Storage, and Handlinq\n18 Insofar as practical, factory assemble items specified herein. Assemblies that due to necessity have to\n19 be shipped unassembled shall be packaged and tagged in manner that will protect materials from\n20 damage and will facilitate identification and field assembly.\n21 Package stainless steel items in a manner to provide protection from carbon impregnation.\n22 Protect painted coatings and hot-dip galvanized finishes from damage due to metal banding and rough\n23 handling. Use padded slings and straps.\n24 Store fabricated items in dry area, not in direct contact with ground.\n25 Part 2 -Products\n26 General\n27 Unless otherwise indicated, meet the following requirements:\nItem ASTM Reference\nSteel Shapes and Plates A36/A36M or A992\nSteel Pipe A501 or A53/A53M, Type E or S, Grade B\nStructural Steel Tubing A500, Grade B\nStainless Steel:\nBars and Angles A276, AISI Type 316\nShapes A276, AISI Type 304\nSteel Plate, Sheet, and Strip A240/A240M, AISI Type 316\nBolts, Threaded Rods, Anchor Bolts, and Anchor F593, AISI Type 316, Condition CW\nStuds\nNuts F594, AISI Type 316, Condition CW\nAppendix 4D.118\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nItem ASTM Reference\nSteel Bolts and Nuts:\nCarbon Steel A307 bolts, with A563 nuts\nHigh-Strength A325, Type 1 bolts, with A563 nuts\nAnchor Bolts and Rods F1554, Grade 55, with weldability\nsupplement SI\nEyebolts A489\nThreaded Rods A36/A36M\nFlat Washers (Unhardened) F844\nFlat and Beveled Washers (Hardened) F436\nThrust Ties for Steel Pipe:\nThreaded Rods A193/Al93M, Grade B7\nNuts Al94/A194M, Grade 2H\nPlate A283/A283M, Grade D\nWelded Anchor Studs A108, Grades C-1010 through C-1020\nAluminum Plates and Structural Shapes B209 and B308/B308M, Alloy 6061-T6\nAluminum Bolts and Nuts F468, Alloy 2024-T4\nCast Iron A48, Class 35\n1 Bolts, Washers, and Nuts: Use stainless steel, hot-dip galvanized steel, zinc-plated steel, and aluminum\n2 material types as indicated in FASTENER SCHEDULE at end of this section.\n3 Anchor Bolts and Anchor Bolt Sleeves\n4 Cast-In-Place Anchor Bolts: Headed type, unless otherwise shown on Drawings.\n5 Material type and protective coating as shown in FASTENER SCHEDULE at end of this section.\n6 Anchor Bolt Sleeves:\n7 Plastic:\n8 Single unit construction with corrugated sleeve.\n9 Top of sleeve shall be self-threading to provide adjustment of threaded anchor bolt projection.\n10 Material: High density polyethylene.\n11 Manufacturer: Sinco Products, Inc., Middletown, CT. (800-243-6753).\n12 Fabricated Steel: ASTM A36/A36M.\n13 Concrete Drilled Anchors\n14 General\n15 AISI Type 316 stainless, hot-dip galvanized, or zinc-plated steel, as shown in FASTENER\n16 SCHEDULE at end of this section.\n17 Current evaluation and acceptance reports by ICBO.\n18 Wedge Anchors:\nAppendix 4D.119\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Manufacturers and Products:\n2 ITW Ramset/Red Head, Wood Dale, IL; Trubolt Wedge Anchor.\n3 Hilti, Inc., Tulsa, OK; Kwik-Bolt II Stud Anchor.\n4 Powers Rawl, New Rochelle, NY; Power-Stud Anchor.\n5 Simpson Strong-Tie Co., Inc., Pleasanton, CA; Wedge-All Anchor.\n6 Wej-It Corp., Tulsa, OK; ANKRtite Wedge Anchor.\n7 U.S. Anchor, Pompano Beach, FL; Kingpin Wedge Anchor.\n8 Expansion Anchors: Self-drilling anchors, snap-off or flush type, zinc-plated.\n9 Nondrilling Anchors: Flush type for use with zinc-plated or stainless steel bolt, or stud type with\n10 projecting threaded stud.\n11 Manufacturers and Products:\n12 ITW Ramset/Red Head, Wood Dale, IL; Multi-Set II Drop-In and Self Drill Anchor.\n13 Hilti, Inc., Tulsa, OK; Hilti HDI Drop-In Anchor.\n14 Powers Rawl, New Rochelle, NY; Steel Drop-In Anchor.\n15 Simpson Strong-Tie Co., Inc., Pleasanton, CA; Drop-In Anchor.\n16 Sleeve Anchors:\n17 Manufacturers and Products:\n18 ITW Ramset/Red Head, Wood Dale, IL; Dynabolt Hex Nut Sleeve Anchor.\n19 Powers Rawl, New Rochelle, NY; Hex Head Power-Bolt Anchor.\n20 Simpson Strong-Tie Co., Inc., Pleasanton, CA; Sleeve-All Hex Head Anchor.\n21 Wej-It Corp., Tulsa, OK; Wej-It Sleeve Anchor.\n22 Adhesive Anchors:\n23 Threaded Rod:\n24 ASTM F593 stainless steel threaded rod, diameter as shown on Drawings.\n25 Length as required, to provide minimum depth of embedment.\n26 Clean and free of grease, oil, or other deleterious material.\n27 Adhesive:\n28 Two-component, designed to be used in adverse freeze/thaw environments, with gray color after\n29 mixing.\n30 Cure Temperature, Pot Life, and Workability:\n31 Compatible for intended use and environmental conditions.\n32 Nonsag, with selected viscosity base on installation temperature and overhead application where\n33 applicable.\n34 Packaging and Storage:\n35 Disposable, self-contained cartridge system capable of dispensing both components in the proper\n36 mixing ratio and fitting into a manually or pneumatically operated caulking gun.\n37 Store adhesive cartridges on pallets or shelving in covered storage area, in accordance with\n38 manufacturer's written instructions.\n39 Cartridge Markings:\nAppendix 4D.120\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Include manufacturer's name, product name, material type, batch or serial number, and adhesive\n2 expiration date.\n3 Dispose of cartridges if shelf life has expired.\n4 Manufacturers and Products:\n5 ITW Ramset/Red Head, Wood Dale, IL; Epcon Ceramic 6 Epoxy or A7 Adhesive Anchor System.\n6 Hilti, Inc., Tulsa, OK; HIT Doweling Anchor System, HIT HY 150 (HIT HY 20 for hollow masonry).\n7 Powers Rawl, New Rochelle, NY; Power Fast Epoxy Injection Gel Cartridge System.\n8 Simpson Strong-Tie Co., Inc., Pleasanton, CA; Epoxy-Tie Adhesive ET or Acrylic-Tie Adhesive.\n9 (Use only Acrylic-Tie Adhesive for temperatures below 40 degrees F.)\n10 Covert Operations, Inc., Long Beach, CA; CIA-Gel 7000 Epoxy Anchors.\n11 U.S. Anchor, Pompano Beach, FL; Ultrabond 1.\n12 Unitex, Kansas City, MO; Pro-Poxy 300 and Pro-Poxy 300 Fast Epoxy Adhesive Anchors.\n13 Diversified Fastening Systems of America, Charles City, Iowa; DFS Wedge Anchors.\n14 Adhesive Threaded Inserts: Stainless steel, internally threaded insert.\n15 Manufacturer and Product: Hilti, Inc., Tulsa, OK; HIS-R Insert with HIT HY 150 adhesive.\n16 Welded Anchor Studs\n17 Headed anchor studs (HAS) or threaded anchor studs (TAS), as indicated on Drawings.\n18 Carbon Steel: ASTM A108, Standard Quality Grades 1010 through 1020, inclusive either semikilled or\n19 killed aluminum or silicon dioxidation, unless indicated otherwise.\n20 Stainless Steel: ASTM F593, AISI Type 316, Condition CW, where indicated.\n21 Manufacturers:\n22 Nelson Stud Welding, FabriSteel Co., Elyria, OH.\n23 Stud Welding Associates, Inc., Elyria, OH.\n24 Embedded Steel Support Frames For Floor Plate And Grating\n25 Steel angle support frames to be embedded in concrete shall be stainless steel, ASTM A276, AISI\n26 Type 316, unless indicated otherwise.\n27 Welded anchors for stainless steel support frames shall also be stainless steel.\n28 Abrasive Nosinq For Stairs\n29 Unless otherwise shown on Drawings, furnish flush type abrasive nosing on stairs.\n30 Nosing Components:\n31 Homogeneous epoxy abrasive, with minimum 50 percent aluminum oxide content, formed and cured\n32 upon an extruded aluminum base.\n33 Epoxy abrasive shall extend over and form curved front edge of nosing.\n34 Base of Nosing: Extruded aluminum alloy, 6063-T5, heat-treated.\n35 Anchoring System: Double-set anchors consisting of two rows of integrally extruded anchors.\n36 Size: 3 inches wide by 1/4 to 3/8 inch thick by length as shown.\n37 Color: Selected by Tank Farm Contractor from manufacturer's standard color range.\n38 Manufacturers and Products:\n39 Wooster Products, Inc., Wooster, OH; Spectra Type WP3C.\nAppendix 4D.121\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 American Safety Tread Co., Inc., Helena, AL; Type FA-31 ID.\n2 Fabrication\n3 General:\n4 Fabricate as shown and in accordance with AISC Specification for Structural Steel Buildings and\n5 AISC Code of Standard Practice for Steel Buildings and Bridges.\n6 Finish exposed surfaces smooth, sharp, and to well-defined lines.\n7 Grind cut edges smooth and straight. Round sharp edges to small uniform radius. Grind burrs, jagged\n8 edges, and surface defects smooth.\n9 Fit and assemble in largest practical sections for delivery to site.\n10 Materials:\n11 Use steel shapes, unless otherwise noted.\n12 Steel to be hot-dip galvanized: Limit silicon content to less than 0.04 percent or to between 0.15 and\n13 0.25 percent.\n14 Welding:\n15 Weld connections and grind exposed welds smooth. When required to be watertight, make welds\n16 continuous.\n17 Welded fabrications shall be free from twisting or distortion caused by improper welding techniques.\n18 Steel: Meet fabrication requirements of AWS D 1.1, Section 5.\n19 Stainless Steel: Meet requirements of AWS DI.6.\n20 Welded Anchor Studs:\n21 Prepare surface to be welded and weld with stud welding gun in accordance with AWS D 1.1,\n22 Section 7, and manufacturer's instructions.\n23 Complete welding before applying finish.\n24 Painting:\n25 Coat all fabricated carbon steel as specified in Section 09900, PAINT COATING SYSTEMS, unless\n26 otherwise indicated.\n27 Do not apply protective coating to galvanized steel anchor bolts or galvanized steel welded anchor\n28 studs and stainless steel anchor bolts, unless indicated otherwise.\n29 Galvanizing:\n30 Fabricate steel to be galvanized in accordance with ASTM A 143, ASTM A384, and ASTM A385.\n31 Avoid fabrication techniques that could cause distortion or embrittlement of the steel.\n32 Provide venting and drain holes for tubular members and fabricated assemblies in accordance with\n33 ASTM A385.\n34 Remove welding slag, splatter, burrs, grease, oil, paint, lacquer, and other deleterious material prior to\n35 delivery for galvanizing.\n36 Remove by blast cleaning or other methods surface contaminants and coatings not removable by\n37 normal chemical cleaning process in the galvanizing operation.\n38 Hot-dip galvanize steel members, fabrications, and assemblies after fabrication in accordance with\n39 ASTM A123/A123M.\n40 Hot-dip galvanize bolts, nuts, washers, and hardware components in accordance with\n41 ASTM Al53/Al53M. Oversize holes to allow for zinc alloy growth. Shop assemble bolts and nuts.\n42 Galvanized steel sheets in accordance with ASTM A653.\nAppendix 4D.122\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Galvanize components of bolted assemblies separately before assembly. Galvanizing of tapped holes\n2 is not required.\n3 Accessories: Furnish as required for a complete installation. Fasten by welding or with stainless steel\n4 bolts or screws.\n5 Source Quality Control\n6 Visually inspect all fabrication welds and correct any deficiencies.\n7 Steel: AWS D 1.1, Section 6 and Table 6.1, Visual Inspection Acceptance Criteria.\n8 Stainless Steel: AWS D1.6.\n9 Welded Anchor Studs: AWS D1.1 or AWS D1.6 as applicable.\n10 Part 3 -Execution\n11 Installation Of Metal Fabrications\n12 General\n13 Install metal fabrications plumb or level, accurately fitted, free from distortion or defects.\n14 Install rigid, substantial, and neat in appearance.\n15 Install manufactured products in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations.\n16 Obtain Construction Manager approval prior to field cutting steel members or making adjustments not\n17 scheduled.\n18 Cast-In-Place Anchor Bolts\n19 Accurately locate and hold anchor bolts in place with templates at the time concrete is placed.\n20 Use anchor bolt sleeves for location adjustment and provide two nuts and one washer per bolt of same\n21 material as bolt.\n22 Minimum Bolt Size: 1/2-inch diameter by 12 inches long, unless otherwise shown.\n23 Concrete and Masonry Drilled Anchors\n24 Begin installation only after concrete or masonry to receive anchors has attained design strength.\n25 Install in accordance with manufacturer's instructions.\n26 Provide minimum embedment, edge distance, and spacing as follows, unless indicated otherwise by\n27 anchor manufacturer's instructions or shown otherwise on Drawings:\nMin. Embedment Min. Edge Distance Min. Spacing\nAnchorType (bolt diameters) (bolt diameters) (bolt diameters)\nWedge 9 6 12\nExpansion and Sleeve 4 6 12\nAdhesive 9 9 13.5\n28 Use only drill type and bit type and diameter recommended by anchor manufacturer. Clean hole of\n29 debris and dust with brush and compressed air.\n30 When embedded steel or rebar is encountered in the drill path, slant drill to clear obstruction. If drill\n31 must be slanted more than 10 degrees to clear obstruction, notify Construction Manager for direction\n32 on how to proceed.\n33 Adhesive Anchors:\nAppendix 4D.123\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Do not install adhesive anchors when temperature of concrete is below 40 degrees F (25 degrees F for\n2 Simpson Strong-Tie Acrylic-Tie Adhesive) or above 100 degrees F.\n3 Remove any standing water from hole with oil-free compressed air. Inside surface of hole shall be\n4 dry where required by manufacturer's instructions.\n5 Do not disturb anchor during recommended curing time.\n6 Do not exceed maximum torque as specified in manufacturer's instructions.\n7 Electrolytic Protection\n8 Aluminum and Galvanized Steel:\n9 Coat surfaces of galvanized steel fabricated and aluminum items to be in direct contact with concrete,\n10 grout, masonry, or dissimilar metals, as specified in Section 09900, PAINT COATING SYSTEMS,\n11 unless indicated otherwise.\n12 Do not apply protective coating to galvanized steel anchor bolts or galvanized steel welded anchor\n13 studs, unless indicated otherwise.\n14 Allow coating to dry before installation of the material.\n15 Protect coated surfaces during installation.\n16 Should coating become marred, prepare and touch up in accordance with paint manufacturer's written\n17 instructions.\n18 Stainless Steel:\n19 During handling and installation, take necessary precautions to prevent carbon impregnation of\n20 stainless steel members.\n21 After installation, visually inspect stainless steel surfaces for evidence of iron rust, oil, paint, and\n22 other forms of contamination.\n23 Remove contamination in accordance with requirements of ASTM A380 and A967.\n24 Brushes used to remove foreign substances shall utilize only stainless steel or nonmetallic bristles.\n25 After treatment, visually inspect surfaces for compliance.\n26 Repair Of Galvanized Steel\n27 Conform to ASTM A780.\n28 For minor repairs at abraded areas, use sprayed zinc conforming to ASTM A780.\n29 For flame cut or welded areas, use zinc-based solder, or zinc sticks, conforming to ASTM A780.\n30 Use magnetic gauge to determine that thickness is equal to or greater than the base galvanized coating.\nAppendix 4D. 124\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Fastener Schedule\n2 Provide fasteners as follows:\nService Use and Location Product Remarks\nAnchor Bolts Cast Into Concrete for Structural Steel Column Base Plates\nInterior Dry Areas Hot-dip galvanized steel headed anchor\nbolts, unless indicated otherwise\nExterior and Interior Wet Areas Stainless steel headed anchor bolts\nAnchor Bolts Cast Into Concrete for Equipment Bases\nInterior Dry Areas Stainless steel headed anchor bolts,\nunless otherwise specified with\nequipment\nAnchor Bolts Cast Into Concrete for Metal Fabrications and Structural Components\nInterior Dry Areas Stainless steel headed anchor bolts\nDrilled Anchors for Metal Components to Cast-in-Place Concrete (e.g., Ladders, Handrail Posts,\nElectrical Panels, and Equipment)\nInterior Dry Areas Zinc-plated or stainless steel wedge or\nexpansion anchors\nSubmerged, Exterior, Interior Wet, Adhesive stainless steel anchors\nand Corrosive Areas\nConnections for Structural Steel Framing\nExterior and Interior Wet and Dry High-strength steel bolted connections Use hot-dipped\nAreas galvanized high-\nstrength bolted\nconnections for\ngalvanized steel\nframing members\nConnections for Steel Fabrications\nExterior and Interior Wet and Dry Stainless steel bolted connections\nAreas\nAll Others\nExterior and Interior Wet and Dry Stainless steel fasteners\nAreas\n3 Antiseizing Lubricant: Use on all stainless steel threads.\n4 Do not use adhesive anchors to support fire-resistive construction or where ambient temperature will\n5 exceed 120 degrees F.\nAppendix 4D.125\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Construction Quality Control\n2 Construction General Contractor shall inspect concrete drill anchor installation to verify compliance with\n3 anchor size, embedment, edge length, and spacing as specified herein and shown on the Drawings.\n4 Provide inspection documentation to Construction Manager.\n5 END OF SECTION 05500\nAppendix 4D.126\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nDIVISION 6-WOODS AND PLASTIC (NOT USED)\nAppendix 4D.127\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nDIVISION 7-THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION\nAppendix 4D. 128\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 07210 -BUILDING INSULATION SCHED. B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 References\n4 The following is a list of standards, which may be referenced in this section:\n5 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n6 ASTM C578 Standard Specification for Rigid, Cellular Polystyrene Thermal Insulation.\n7 ASTM C665 Standard Specification for Mineral-Fiber Blanket Thermal Insulation for\n8 Light Frame Construction and Manufactured Housing.\n9 ASTM D4397 Standard Specification for Polyethylene Sheeting for Construction,\n10 Industrial, and Agricultural Applications.\n11 Submittals-Approval Required\n12 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n13 Product Data: Submit product data indicating compliance with the requirements of this section.\n14 Material Storage\n15 Store off ground and keep dry at all times. Protect against weather condensation and damage.\n16 Part 2 -Products\n17 Materials\n18 Mineral/Glass Fiber Blanket/Batt Insulation: ASTM C665, Type III, Class B, fiberglass batts with\n19 vinyl vapor retarder; R-30 for roof and R-19 for walls.\n20 Rigid Insulation: ASTM C578, Type IV, extruded polystyrene; R-value as shown.\n21 Vapor Retarder: ASTM D4397 plastic sheeting, 6 mils minimum.\n22 Part 3 -Execution\n23 Installation\n24 Batt Insulation:\n25 Install in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.\n26 Fasten flanges to the sides of framing members with the vapor retarder facing the warm side. Fit\n27 tightly to ensure a continuous seal.\n28 Where electrical outlets, ducts, pipes, vents, or other utility items occur, place insulation on the cold\n29 weather side of the obstruction.\n30 Provide fasteners, adhesive, tape, and sealant as recommended by insulation manufacturer.\n31 Vapor Retarder:\n32 Apply to inside face of exterior wall and ceiling framing in sheets as large as possible, lapping all\n33 joints 6 inches and sealing with sealant and tape recommended by manufacturer.\n34 Fit tightly and seal around all penetrations.\n35 Replace torn and punctured sheets.\n36 Repair minor tears or holes with tape.\n37 Repair by replacement major tears or holes that require more than a 6-inch length of tape to repair.\n38 Rigid Insulation:\nAppendix 4D.129\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Install with fasteners or adhesive recommended by manufacturer.\n2 Butt joints tightly together.\n3 Where thicker than 2 inches, install in two layers, staggering all joints.\n4 Cleanup and Protection\n5 Remove from site all containers, wrappings, and scrap insulation material. Leave floors broom clean.\n6 Protect installed insulation from tears or other damage until covered with finish material. Replace\n7 damaged material.\n8 END OF SECTION 07210\nAppendix 4D.130\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nDIVISION 8-DOORS AND WINDOWS (NOT USED)\nAppendix 4D.131\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nDIVISION 9-FINISHES\nAppendix 4D.132\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI SECTION 09900 -PAINT COATING SYSTEMS SCHED. A & B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 References\n4 The following documents and others referenced therein form part of Contract to the extent designated.\n5 Referenced documents are those current, unless otherwise indicated.\n6 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n7 ASTM D412 Test Methods for Vulcanized Rubber and Thermoplastic Rubbers and\n8 Thermoplastic Elastomers -Tension\n9 ASTM D570 Test Method for Water Absorption of Plastics\n10 ASTM D638 Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics\n11 ASTM D714 Test Method for Evaluating Degree of Blistering of Paints\n12 ASTM D772 Test Method for Evaluating Degree of Flaking (Scaling) of Exterior Paints\n13 ASTM D1653 Test Methods for Water Vapor Transmission of Organic Coating Films\n14 ASTM D3912 Test Method for Chemical Resistance of Coatings Used in Light-Water\n15 Nuclear Power Plants\n16 ASTM D4060 Test Method for Abrasion Resistance of Organic Coatings by the Taber\n17 Abraser\n18 ASTM D4082 Test Method for Effects of Gamma Radiation on Coatings for Use in Light-\n19 Water Nuclear Power Plants\n20 ASTM D4259 Standard Practice for Abrading Concrete\n21 ASTM D4263 Test Method for Indicating Moisture Content in Concrete by the Plastic Sheet\n22 Method\n23 ASTM D4541 Test Method for Pull-Off Strength of Coatings Using Portable Adhesion\n24 Testers\n25 ASTM D5139 Sample Preparation for Qualification Testing of Coatings to be Used in\n26 Nuclear Power Plants\n27 ASTM D5144 Guide for Use of Protective Coating Standards in Nuclear Power Plants\n28 ASTM E84 Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials\n29 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION (NFPA)\n30 NFPA 255 Method of Test of Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials\n31 SOCIETY FOR PROTECTIVE COATINGS (SSPC)\n32 SSPC-SP 3 Power Tool Cleaning\n33 SSPC-SP 6 Commercial Blast Cleaning\n34 Submittals -Approval Required\n35 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures\n36 List of Materials: Before delivery, submit colors and location to be used and manufacturer catalog data\n37 sheets and charts showing adequate information to substantiate compliance to the requirements of this\n38 section.\nAppendix 4D.133\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Submittal shall also enumerate percentage of volatile and nonvolatile materials, percentage of component\n2 parts of each type of material, and the conversion factors to determine dry film thickness from applied wet\n3 film thickness. Also, submit Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) for materials proposed to be used.\n4 Installer's Certificate (Decontaminable Coatings Only): Before application, submit documentation\n5 that the application crew has been certified by the coating system manufacturer as qualified to apply the\n6 selected coating system. As an alternative to crew certification, a submittal documenting onsite training\n7 by a technical representative from the coating manufacturer would be acceptable.\n8 Cleaning and Disposal Plan: Before application, submit a plan for proper collection, storage, and\n9 disposal of all materials spotted or soaked with paint, oil, solvents, and other flammable waste materials.\n10 The plan shall also address handling and disposal of empty cans. The plan shall address both daily\n11 cleanup requirements and cleanup at the completion of the coatings application activities.\n12 Submit documentation and test results from construction quality control testing specified herein.\n13 Delivery, Storage, And Handling\n14 Obtain inspection and acceptance by Tank Farm Contractor before opening containers or removing labels.\n15 Project Conditions\n16 Environment for Coating: Coat exterior surfaces only when ambient and surface temperatures are\n17 within the range recommended by the coating manufacturer for the respective coating, which is within 40\n18 to 120 degrees F, and ambient temperature is a minimum of 5 degrees F above the dewpoint.\n19 Part 2 -Products\n20 Materials\n21 Shop Primer for Carbon Steel Assemblies: Ameron-Amerlock 400.\n22 Decontaminable Coatings for all Metal and Concrete: (Service Level II as defined in ASTM D5144)\n23 Decontaminability: Evaluation of coating systems decontaminability as noted in ASTM D5144 Section\n24 5.4, is difficult to quantify. To determine the coating systems decontamination properties, the coating\n25 system shall be tested for chemical resistance properties as addressed in this specification.\n26 Radiation Tolerance: Coatings applied to the specified thickness shall demonstrate tolerance to a total\n27 accumulated dose in air of 6 x 10'Rads of gamma radiation in accordance with ASTM D4082. Test\n28 samples shall be prepared in accordance with ASTM D5139.\nAppendix 4D.134\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Physical Properties: Base and finish coatings shall have the physical property strengths shown in the\n2 tables below as determined by the respective test method.\n3 For Rigid Decontaminable Coatings (High Solids Epoxies):\nTest Method Results\nAdhesion to Substrate ASTM D4541 Steel-Minimum 900 psi Concrete-8% of\nconcrete compressive strength\nElongation at break at 750F Minimum 5%\nWater Absorption or ASTM D570 (24 hr) Maximum 0.5%\nMoisture Vapor Transmission ASTM D1653 Maximum 8 gm/m2\nWear Resistance (Finish or lost ASTM D4060, Less than 175 mg\nTop Coat Only) 1,000 cycles, 1,000 g\nweight, CS-17 wheel\n4 Chemical Resistance: The coating system shall be resistant to the standard decontamination solutions\n5 listed in ASTM D3912, Figure 1. Chemical resistance testing shall be in accordance with ASTM D3912,\n6 or an equivalent standard, for occasional splash and spillage service, except test samples shall be prepared\n7 in accordance with ASTM D5139. Submit manufacturer's chemical resistance test plan, including\n8 procedure for exposing coating samples for evaluating occasional splash and spillage conditions, for\n9 evaluation and approval. Criteria for acceptance shall be based on the following:\n10 Flaking: As evaluated in accordance with ASTM D772, flaking and peeling shall not be permitted\n11 Blistering:\n12 As evaluated in accordance with ASTM D714, blisters shall be limited to size 4, 6, or 8, and a\n13 frequency no more than a \"few.\"\n14 Delamination will not be permitted.\n15 Slight discoloration will be permitted.\n16 Coating shall be volatile organic content (VOC) compliant with a maximum VOC of 2.9 lbs/gal.\n17 Fire Characteristics:\n18 Coatings used shall not develop significant qualities of toxic or other harmful products of combustion\n19 when exposed to fire. Coatings shall have a UL (ASTM E84/NFPA 255) flame spread rating of 25 or\n20 less and smoke developed rating of 50 or less. .\n21 Coatings shall be repairable for cracks appearing through the applied-coated surface to the substrate\n22 and for chips and flaking due to mechanical damage.\n23 Coating shall have a design life of 12 years. In addition to radiation tolerance requirements, coating\n24 shall be resistant to humidity ranging from 0 to 100 percent and an ambient air temperature range of\n25 120 degrees F to minus 32 degrees F, with a maximum 24-hour differential of 52 degrees F.\n26 Primers, thinners, and coating accessory materials shall be produced or approved for use by the same\n27 manufacturer as the finish coating system.\n28 Decontaminable Coating Systems (Epoxies), or Approved Substitute:\n29 Manufacturer Product Ameron\n30 Steel and Concrete Primer Amerlock 400\n31 Concrete Surfacer Nu-Klad 114A\n32 Base Coating Amerlock 400\nAppendix 4D.135\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Intermediate and Finish Coating PSX 700 Siloxane\n2 Joint Sealant: \"Nu-Klad 750A/760A\" by Ameron, or approved substitutes, shall be used.\n3 Scrim Cloth: Glass fiber reinforcing fabric as recommended by coating system manufacturer.\n4 Part 3 -Execution\n5 Examination\n6 Examine surfaces scheduled to receive coatings for conditions that will adversely affect execution,\n7 performance, or quality of work, and that cannot be put into acceptable condition through preparatory\n8 work.\n9 Report conditions that could adversely affect proper application of coatings, in writing, to\n10 Construction Manager. Do not begin surface preparation or coating application until defects have\n11 been corrected and conditions have been made suitable.\n12 Preparation\n13 Before application, remove as much dust and debris as possible from space or area to receive coating to\n14 allow for proper installation.\n15 Pre-Priming:\n16 Ferrous Metal and Carbon Steel:\n17 Remove oil, grease, welding fluxes, and other surface contaminants prior to blast cleaning.\n18 Prepare shop assemblies in accordance with SSPC-SP 6. Remove abrasive residue and dust, and\n19 prime within 4 hours after preparation. Apply minimum of 3.0 mil of shop primer in accordance with\n20 manufacturer's recommendations.\n21 Select type and size of abrasive to produce a surface profile that meets coating manufacturer's\n22 recommendations for particular primer to be used.\n23 Prepare field erections in accordance with SSPC-SP 3 or SSPC-SP 6. Remove abrasive residue and\n24 dust.\n25 Surface Preparation:\n26 Shop and field surface cleaning and surface preparation requirements for all substrates shall be in\n27 accordance with the manufacturer's written instructions and these Specifications. Where the\n28 specified degree of surface preparation differs from the manufacturer's recommendations, the more\n29 stringent shall apply.\n30 Concrete shall be at least 30 days old before coating is applied.\n31 Prior to application of coating system or surfacer to new concrete surfaces, perform a plastic sheet test\n32 in accordance with ASTM D4263. The test shall be initiated in the afternoon and completed the\n33 following morning. The absence of condensation on the test sheet shall indicate the concrete is ready\n34 to have the coating system applied. Document test results.\n35 Clean new concrete surfaces to be coated by Abrasive Blast Cleaning Procedures in accordance with\n36 ASTM D4259.\n37 Prepare or repair construction joints, shrinkage cracks, and other non-expanding cracks, gaps, or\n38 crevices in the surface to be coated, in accordance with coating manufacturer's recommendations.\n39 Scratches, cracks, holes, pinholes, and abrasions shall be cut back to proper key and filled with\n40 surfacer.\n41 Post-Priming: Feather abrasions, chips, skips, and holidays occurring in prime coat by sanding, and\n42 recoat with material and color to minimum dry film thickness specified.\nAppendix 4D.136\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Previously coated surfaces shall be recoated only after existing film is completely dry. Some coating\n2 systems require the application of succeeding coats within a set time frame for it to properly adhere to the\n3 previous coat. Should the time frame recommended by the coating manufacturer be exceeded, prepare\n4 the base coat as recommended by the coating manufacturer.\n5 Protection:\n6 Provide and install drop cloths, shields, and other protective devices required to protect surfaces\n7 adjacent to areas being coated. Keep spatter, smears, droppings, and over-run of coating materials to\n8 a minimum and remove as coating work progresses.\n9 Protect coating from rain until dry to touch.\n10 Upon completion of each coating application, protect coated surfaces from physical damage or\n11 chemical contamination.\n12 Application\n13 Apply coating materials in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations.\n14 Apply with equipment recommended by coating manufacturer.\n15 Number of Coats, Film Thickness:\n16 Apply the minimum number of coats specified without regard to coating thickness. Additional coats\n17 may be required to obtain minimum required paint thickness, depending on method of application,\n18 differences in manufacturers' products, and atmospheric conditions.\n19 Maximum film build per coat shall not exceed coating manufacturer's recommendations.\n20 Give particular attention to edges, angles, flanges, and other similar areas, where insufficient film\n21 thickness is likely to be present, and ensure proper millage in these areas.\n22 Sealant Application:\n23 Rigid Coating Systems:\n24 After pre-primer is installed (see Article COAT SCHEDULE), apply sealant to expansion joints at the\n25 coated surface boundary. Mask limits of joint to provide a neat appearance. Roughen contact\n26 surfaces with sandpaper. Prime and install sealant in accordance with manufacturer's instructions.\n27 Identify each coat of opaque material by its relation to color of finish coat. Prime coat shall be\n28 darkest tint of specified color with each succeeding coat lighter, up to finish coat, which shall be\n29 color, tint, and sheen specified in Article COAT SCHEDULE or as shown on the Drawings. Tints of\n30 identical coats of identical color and material shall not vary.\n31 Recoat and repair as necessary for compliance with the Specifications.\n32 Cleaninq\n33 Collect and dispose of materials spotted or soaked with paint, oil, or solvents, and other flammable\n34 waste materials daily in accordance with the coating manufacturer's recommendations. Minimize\n35 volume of potentially contaminated solids and liquids that must be disposed.\n36 Salvageable brushes, rollers, spatulas, and spray equipment shall be thoroughly cleaned after use and\n37 shall contain no oils, thinners, or other residue after cleaning.\n38 Dispose of empty cans at end of each shift in accordance with the cleaning and disposal plan.\n39 At completion of coating work, remove and dispose of materials, containers, rags, cloths, brushes,\n40 equipment, and miscellaneous other debris in accordance with the cleaning and disposal plan. Clean\n41 up spills and report, if required, in accordance with the cleaning and disposal plan.\nAppendix 4D.137\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Construction Quality Control\n2 The Construction General Contractor shall perform the field tests specified herein with properly\n3 calibrated instruments. All testing shall be performed and recorded by personnel trained in the use of the\n4 test instruments.\n5 Thickness Testing:\n6 Measure coating thickness on steel with a properly calibrated, magnetic type dry film thickness gauge\n7 (as manufactured by Nordson; or approved equal).\n8 Measure the wet film thickness (WFT) of each coat of material with a notched WFT gage\n9 (Nordson 790-015) at a minimum of five evenly spaced points for each 100 square feet of surface\n10 area or portion thereof to verify the application will provide the specified minimum dry film\n11 thickness.\n12 Adhesion Testing:\n13 Adhesion testing is required where the specified decontaminable coatings system is applied to\n14 concrete.\n15 Perform adhesion testing at each field or shop location where surfaces are prepared and coatings are\n16 applied.\n17 After surface preparation and coating application procedures have been observed and approved by the\n18 paint manufacturer's representative, select one representative location for an adhesion pull test. If the\n19 adhesion pull test does not meet the specified requirement, perform additional pull tests to determine\n20 the area of inadequate adhesion. Remove and replace coatings with inadequate adhesion.\n21 If changes are observed in the shop or field application procedures that may affect coating adhesion,\n22 Construction Manager may require additional adhesion tests.\n23 Construction General Contractor shall provide all test equipment required for adhesion testing.\n24 Repair all coatings damaged by adhesion testing in accordance with the coating manufacturer's\n25 directions.\n26 Inspection: Perform tests to ascertain that coating materials have been applied as specified in this\n27 section. Document test results. Document surface preparation, application of all coats of material, and\n28 performance of wet and dry film thickness testing in accordance with this section.\n29 Perform water tightness test of concrete sumps in accordance with Component Construction Acceptance\n30 Test as provided in the Construction Inspection Plan, RPP-18490, Rev. 0.\n31 Application Schedule\n32 Concrete: Coat exposed concrete surfaces of building slabs, truck loading slab, sump, and other concrete\n33 surfaces as shown on the Drawings.\n34 Carbon Steel:\n35 Coat all exposed carbon steel with the coating system specified in Article COATING SCHEDULE.\n36 Coat concrete embedded anchor bolts and concrete embedded structural steel with carbon steel\n37 coating system, except delete intermediate and finish coats. Repair coating on anchor bolt threads\n38 after nuts are installed in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations.\n39 See Section 13122, METAL BUILDING SYSTEMS, for painting requirements associated with\n40 prefabricated steel buildings and Section 13205, LINED BOLTED STEEL LIQUID STORAGE\n41 TANKS, for painting requirements associated with the bolted steel tank.\n42 Aluminum and Galvanized Steel in Contact with Concrete: Coat aluminum and galvanized steel in\n43 contact with concrete with carbon steel coating system, primer only. Provide a minimum dry film\n44 thickness of 4 mils.\nAppendix 4D.138\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nCoat Schedule\nColor\n(*see Minimum Dry Film\nCoat Description Note 1) pm (mils)\nConcrete -Rigid Coating System (Epoxies):\nPre-Prime Amerlock 400-thinned N/A Enough to seal surface\napprox. 20-25% with\n#65 thinner.\nJoint Sealer NuKlad 760A N/A N/A\nSurfacer NuKlad 114A N/A As required to fill\nvoids\nPrime and Base Amerlock 400 * Two coats:\nPrime 75 (3.0)\nBase 100 (4.0)\nPSX 700 Siloxane *\nIntermediate and Finish. Between Two coats:\ncoats wipe entire surface with clean Intermediate 100 (4.0)\nthinner #65, #12, or equal. Finish 100 (4.0)\n(See Note 2)\nVitrogrit crushed glass abrasive #29 Round Mesh\n(See Note 7)\nCarbon Steel:\nShop and Field Primer Amerlock 400, * 75 (3.0)\nsee Note 3\nBase Amerlock 400, * 100 (4.0)\nsee Note 3\nIntermediate See Note 4 * 100 (4.0)\nPSX 700 Siloxane\nFinish PSX 700 Siloxane 100 (4.0)\nPVC (exterior UV exposed):\nFinish Carbocrylic 3359 DTM 100 (4.0)\n(See notes 5 and 6)\n2 Notes:\n3 1. Contrast each coat from primer-darker to finish-lighter. Finish coat to be off-white to white, except\n4 bollards, truck loading connection piping support, and manhole lids, which shall be yellow.\n5 2. Verify recoating times between intermediate and finish coats with the coating manufacturer if relative\n6 humidity is less than 40 percent.\n7 3. Prime and base coats may be applied in single 180 ptm coat if base coat is self-priming.\n8 4. For anchor bolts, delete intermediate and finish coats.\n9 5. Prepare PVC by hand tool cleaning (scuff sand) using minimum 80 grit sandpaper in all directions.\nAppendix 4D.139\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 6. For PVC associated with stilling wells at leachate tanks, coat only PVC exposed to UV above tank\n2 floating cover.\n3 7. For the Truck Loading concrete pad, apply #29 round mesh VitroGrit crushed glass abrasive in\n4 between the intermediate and final coat in accordance with manufacturer's recommendation. After\n5 the intermediate coat is applied spread the sand in excess over the wet surface and let dry. After the\n6 surface has dried, sweep or vacuum the excess sand and apply the final coat.\n7 END OF SECTION 09900\n8\nAppendix 4D.140\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nDIVISION 10-SPECIALTIES (NOT USED)\nAppendix 4D.141\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nDIVISION 11-EQUIPMENT\nAppendix 4D.142\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 11305 -COMBINED AND BUILDING SUMP PUMPS SCHED. B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 References\n4 The following is a list of standards that may be referenced in this section:\n5 AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANSI).\n6 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n7 ASTM A48 Standard Specification for Gray Iron Castings\n8 ASTM A576 Standard Specification for Steel Bars, Carbon, Hot-Wrought, Special Quality\n9 HYDRAULIC INSTITUTE STANDARDS (HIS)\n10 NATIONAL ELECTRIC CODE (NEC)\n11 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION (NEMA)\n12 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION (NFPA)\n13 NFPA 70 National Electric Code\n14 UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES INC. (UL)\n15 Definitions\n16 Terminology pertaining to pumping unit performance and construction shall conform to ratings and\n17 nomenclature of Hydraulic Institute Standards.\n18 Submittals-Approval Required\n19 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n20 Make, model, weight, and horsepower of each equipment assembly.\n21 Complete catalog information, descriptive literature, specifications, and identification of materials of\n22 construction.\n23 Performance data curves showing head, capacity, horsepower demand, and pump efficiency over\n24 entire operating range of pump, from shutoff to maximum capacity. Indicate separately head,\n25 capacity, horsepower demand, overall efficiency, and minimum submergence required at guarantee\n26 point.\n27 Power and control wiring diagrams, including terminals and numbers.\n28 Complete motor nameplate data, as defined by NEMA, from motor manufacturer.\n29 Functional testing plan demonstrating compliance with requirements specified herein.\n30 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n31 Information/Record (IR): Results of construction quality control testing.\n32 Vendor Information (VI):\n33 Manufacturer's printed installation instructions, operations, and maintenance data, including\n34 preventative maintenance tasks and frequencies for performance of those tasks.\n35 Suggested spare parts list to maintain equipment in service for period of 5 years. Include list of\n36 special tools required for checking, testing, parts replacement, and maintenance with current price\n37 information.\n38 Factory finish system.\nAppendix 4D.143\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Extra Materials\n2 Furnish for each pump: One set mechanical seals.\n3 Part 2 -Products\n4 Supplements\n5 Specific requirements are attached to this section as supplements.\n6 Components\n7 Pump equipment shall consist of pump(s) complete with motor(s), anchoring brackets, power cable(s),\n8 and pump lifting cable(s).\n9 Lifting Arrangement: 2 feet minimum, stainless steel chain, and one \"grip-eye\". Attach chain\n10 permanently to pump and access platform with stainless steel wire rope. \"Grip-eye\" will be capable of\n11 being threaded over and engaging links of stainless steel chain so pump and motor may be lifted with\n12 \"grip-eye\" and independent hoist.\n13 Components -Typical:\n14 Oil chamber between seals shall be equipped with drain and inspection plug. Plug shall have positive\n15 anti-leak seal and shall be easily accessible from outside.\n16 Motor nameplate horsepower shall not be exceeded at any head-capacity point on pump curve.\n17 Pump motor and sensor cables shall be suitable for submersible pump application and cable sizing\n18 shall conform to NEC specifications for pump motors. Cable shall be of sufficient length to reach\n19 junction boxes without strain or splicing.\n20 Cable Entry System:\n21 Junction chamber and motor shall be separated by stator lead sealing gland or terminal board that\n22 shall prevent foreign material entering through pump top.\n23 Utilize cable with factory-installed sealing gland with nonshrink epoxy seal system.\n24 O-ring compression seal between sealing gland and cable entry point shall also be acceptable.\n25 Accessories\n26 Equipment Identification Plate: 16-gauge stainless steel with 1/4-inch die-stamped equipment tag\n27 number securely mounted in readily visible location.\n28 Lifting Lugs: Equipment weighing over 100 pounds.\n29 Factory Finishing\n30 Manufacturer's standard enamel finish.\n31 Part 3 -Execution\n32 Installation\n33 Install in accordance with manufacturer's printed instructions.\n34 Connect suction and discharge piping without imposing strain to pump flanges.\n35 Construction Quality Control\n36 Construction General Contractor shall perform functional testing in accordance with approved test plan.\n37 Functional testing shall be performed in presence of Construction Manager or representative designated\n38 by the Construction Manager. Notify Construction Manager in writing at least 5 days in advance of\n39 testing.\nAppendix 4D.144\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Functional Test: Conduct on each pump.\n2 Flow Output: Measured by plant instrumentation and/or storage volumes.\n3 Amp Draw:\n4 Verify motor current agrees with motor nameplate.\n5 Test for continuous 30-minute period.\n6 Supplements\n7 The supplements listed below, following \"END OF SECTION\", are part of this Specification.\n8 Sump Pump Data Sheet, 11305-01.\n9 Sump Pump Data Sheet, 11305-02.\n10 END OF SECTION 11305\n11\nAppendix 4D.145\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Sump Pump Data Sheet, 11305-01\n2 Tag Numbers: 219A-LH-P-207, 219E-LH-P-207\n3 Pump Locations and I.D.: Buildings 219A and 219E, Combined Sump Pump\n4 Manufacturer and Model Number: (1) Hydromatic Pump Co., Model SB3S\n5 (2) Barnes\n6 (3) Or approved equal\n7 Service Conditions\n8 Liquid Pumped (Material and Percent): Leachate from low-level radioactive waste disposal facility and\n9 rain/snow melt\n10 Pumping Temperature (Fahrenheit): Normal: 55 Max: 130 Min: 27\n11 Specific Gravity at 60 Degrees F: 1.0 Viscosity Range: N/A pH: 5.0-9.3\n12 Abrasive (Y/N) (fine/coarse soil particles) Possible Scale Buildup (Y/N): Y\n13 Total suspended solids (mg/L) 200 (estimated)\n14 Largest diameter solid pump can pass (inches) 0.5\n15 Performance Requirements\n16 Capacity (US gpm): Rated: 250\n17 Total Dynamic Head (Ft): Rated: 19\n18 Maximum Shutoff Pressure (Ft): 50\n19 Min. Rated Pump Hydraulic Efficiency at Rated Capacity (%): 50\n20 Max. Pump Speed at Rated Capacity (rpm): 1_75)\n21 Constant (Y/N): Y Adjustable (YN): N\n22 Design And Materials\n23 Pump Type: Heavy-Duty Nonclog (Y/N) Y\n24 Volute Material: Cast Iron ASTM A48\n25 Pump Casing Material: Cast Iron ASTM A48\n26 Motor Housing Material: Cast Iron ASTM A48\n27 Induction Drive Motor\n28 Horsepower: 0.30 Voltage: 460 Phase: 3 Speed (rpm): _1250\n29 Service Factor: 1.15 Inverter Duty (Y/N): N\n30 Motor nameplate horsepower shall not be exceeded at any head-capacity point on the pump curve.\n31 Enclosure: Explosion-proof, submersible, Class 1, Div. I or Div. 2, Groups C and D\n32\nAppendix 4D.146\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Sump Pump Data Sheet, 11305-02\n2 Tag Numbers: 219A-LH-P-205, 219E-LH-P-205\n3 Pump Locations and I.D.: Buildings 219A and 219E, Floor Sump\n4 Manufacturer and Model Number: (1) Hydromatic Pump Co.\n5 (2) Barnes\n6 Service Conditions\n7 Liquid Pumped: Leachate from low-level radioactive waste disposal facility\n8 Pumping Temperature (Fahrenheit): Normal: 55 Max 130 Min 27\n9 Specific Gravity at 60 Degrees F: 1.0 Viscosity Range: N/A pH: 5-9.3\n10 Abrasive (Y/N) Y (fine/coarse soil particles) Possible Scale Buildup (Y/N): Y\n11 Total suspended solids (mg/L) 200 (estimated)\n12 Largest diameter solid pump can pass (inches) 0.5\n13 Performance Requirements\n14 Capacity (US gpm): Rated: 28\n15 Total Dynamic Head (Ft): Rated: 14\n16 Maximum Shutoff Pressure (Ft): 30\n17 Min. Rated Pump Hydraulic Efficiency at Rated Capacity (%): 4\n18 Max. Pump Speed at Rated Capacity (rpm): 1,750\n19 Constant (Y/N): (YN):\n20 Design And Materials\n21 Pump Type: Heavy-Duty Nonclog (Y/N) Y\n22 Volute Material: Cast Iron ASTM A48\n23 Pump Casing Material: Cast Iron ASTM A48\n24 Motor Housing Material: Cast Iron ASTM A48\n25 Induction Drive Motor\n26 Horsepower: 0.30 Voltage: 460 Phase: 3 Speed (rpm): 17_50\n27 Service Factor: 1.15 Inverter Duty (Y/N): N\n28 Motor nameplate horsepower shall not be exceeded at any head-capacity point on the pump curve.\n29 Enclosure: Submersible\nAppendix 4D.147\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 11306 -LEACHATE PUMPS SCHED. B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 General\n4 Provide multi-stage, centrifugal, submersible pumps specifically designed for landfills and sideslope\n5 installations. Pumps shall be designed for pumping contaminated water and leachate. Provide all\n6 necessary pump appurtenances including lifting cable for lowering and removing the pump, power\n7 cable, a minimum 4-wheel system at each end of the pump specifically designed for transporting the\n8 pump in HDPE butt-fused carrier pipe, outlet pipe attachments and flex hose as necessary, and all\n9 other fittings or accessories required for a complete and fully functional installation.\n10 The pump and all associated appurtenances shall be designed by the pump manufacturer to operate as\n11 a fully functional and reliable pump system. Provide a pump system capable of operating unattended\n12 with a high degree of reliability with multiple cycles per day.\n13 Provide vent valve system, if necessary, to purge air from pumps to prevent pump air lock. Vacuum\n14 air release valves are provided in system piping at top of riser.\n15 Provide quick-couple fitting at end of pump where outlet pipe attaches.\n16 Remove pump discharge check valve or drill hole in check valve to prevent water from accumulating\n17 above pump outlet. Pump shall be fully capable of operating with check valve removed.\n18 Provide stainless steel tag numbers and mounting fasteners and engrave with the equipment tag\n19 number and model number for each pump.\n20 Note that pump control will be accomplished through software programming and the PLC mounted in\n21 the system control panels (by others) located in each Crest Pad Building.\n22 Submittals-Approval Required\n23 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n24 Make, model, weight, and horsepower of each equipment assembly.\n25 Complete catalog information, descriptive literature, specifications, and identification of materials of\n26 construction.\n27 Performance data curves showing head, capacity, horsepower demand, and pump efficiency over the\n28 entire operating range of the pump, from shutoff to maximum capacity. Indicate separately the head,\n29 capacity, horsepower demand, overall efficiency, and minimum submergence required at the\n30 guarantee point.\n31 Functional testing plan demonstrating compliance with requirements specified herein.\n32 Detailed mechanical and electrical drawings showing the equipment dimensions, size, and locations\n33 of connections and weights of associated equipment.\n34 Detailed catalog information, descriptive literature, and specifications of all components associated\n35 with pump removal system.\n36 Power and control wiring diagrams, including terminals and numbers.\n37 Complete motor nameplate data, as defined by NEMA, motor manufacturer.\n38 Results of source quality control testing.\n39 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n40 Information/Record (IR):\n41 Manufacturer's certification of factory testing to establish conformance with specified requirements.\n42 Certification must include certificates of calibration traceable to a nationally recognized standards\n43 organization such as National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).\n44 Special shipping, storage and protection, and handling instructions.\nAppendix 4D. 148\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Manufacturer's Certificate of Proper Installation.\n2 Results of field quality control testing.\n3 Vendor Information (VI):\n4 Suggested spare parts list to maintain the equipment in service for a period of 1 year. Include a list of\n5 special tools required for checking, testing, parts replacement, and maintenance with current price\n6 information.\n7 List special tools, materials, and supplies furnished with equipment for use prior to and during startup\n8 and for future maintenance.\n9 Manufacturer's printed installation instructions, including recommended preventative maintenance\n10 tasks and frequencies for performance of those tasks.\n11 Operation and maintenance manual.\n12 Part 2 -Products\n13 Pumps\n14 All major components shall be Type 304 stainless steel including the housing, fasteners, shaft, diffuser\n15 chamber, and impeller(s). Components shall be highly corrosion resistant and suitable for contaminated\n16 water and leachate service. Gaskets, O-rings, and seals shall have compatibility properties equivalent to\n17 Viton material as a minimum.\n18 Pump bearings shall have better heat and wear resistance than Teflon bearings.\n19 Provide power and stainless steel cable as recommended by manufacturer and to the length and\n20 configuration as shown on the Drawings.\n21 Motors\n22 Provide sealed pump motors suitable for continuous submerged service. Provide continuous motor leads\n23 without splices along the full length of the discharge pipe. Leads shall be fully insulated with chemical\n24 and waterproof insulation properties. Provide motor designed for continuous duty and multiple cycle\n25 times of 60 starts per hour. Motors shall have thermal overload protection.\n26 Source Quality Control\n27 Construction General Contractor shall perform source quality testing at the factory as specified herein.\n28 Notify Construction Manager in writing at least 10 days in advance of testing. Construction Manager will\n29 coordinate with personnel required to witness testing.\n30 Factory Tests and Adjustments: Test all equipment actually furnished.\n31 Factory Test Report: Include test data sheets, curve test results, performance test logs.\n32 Performance Test\n33 Conduct on each pump.\n34 Perform under simulated operating conditions, at a minimum of six operating points on the pump\n35 curve.\n36 Test for a continuous 30-minute period without malfunction. Check for excessive or abnormal\n37 vibrations and correct deficiencies.\n38 Test Log: Record the following:\n39 Total head.\n40 Flow measured by factory instrumentation and/or storage volumes.\n41 Average distance from suction well water surface to pump discharge centerline for duration of test.\nAppendix 4D.149\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Pump discharge pressure converted to feet of liquid pumped and corrected to pump discharge\n2 centerline.\n3 Driving motor voltage and amperage measured for each phase.\n4 Adjust or modify units and retest if necessary.\n5 Pump Removal System:\n6 Provide one common manual pump removal winch and winch support for raising and lowering the\n7 LCRS low flow and secondary leak detection pump and associated discharge piping. Provide one\n8 manual pump removal winch and winch support for raising and lowering the high flow pump and\n9 associated discharge piping. Winches shall be brake (spur gear) winch with automatic brake: Them\n10 Model No. 4032PB (low flow/secondary leak detection) and M452B (high flow), or equal. Provide\n11 winch with sufficient capacity to handle required length of lifting cable (stainless steel wire rope).\n12 Lifting cable shall include and the winch accommodate a swage ball fitting cable end for quick\n13 connect/disconnect.\n14 Winch shall be mounted on structural steel support. The winch support shall only be installed for\n15 pump installation/removal. Three sets of drop-in anchors shall be installed in floor that match the\n16 winch support base bolt pattern. Each set of drop-in anchors shall be located to align the winch\n17 support with each HDPE riser pipe such that the lifting cable does not rub the HDPE riser pipe during\n18 pump installation/removal. Coordinate location of the drop-in anchors with Construction Manager.\n19 Provide two manual hose reels for separately handling the leachate pump power and level transducer\n20 cables. Hose reels shall be heavy-duty hand crank reels with adjustable spool rotation drag and spool\n21 lock pins. Hose reels shall be Reelcraft Model No. C33118L1, or equal. Each reel shall be located as\n22 required for proper alignment with appropriate riser pipe. Drop-in anchors shall be installed in floor\n23 that match hose reel \"feet\" bolt pattern for both reels. Bolts shall be left in place to prevent\n24 accumulation of dirt, etc., in anchor threads. Bolts shall be tapered flathead to eliminate tripping\n25 hazard.\n26 Level Sensors:\n27 Provide level sensors integral to Cell 1 and Cell 2 LDS leachate pump (two total) as shown on the\n28 Drawings. Level elements shall be designed and constructed for landfill leachate service, i.e., fully\n29 submersible and chemically resistant.\n30 The level sensor shall include a transmitter with built-in temperature compensation and an accuracy\n31 of plus or minus 1.0 percent. Sensor output shall be a conditioned compensated 4 to 20 mA signal.\n32 The sensor control cable shall be shielded to prevent signal disruption and include a vent tube for\n33 atmospheric pressure compensation. Control cables shall include polyurethane jacket and Kevlar\n34 tension members.\n35 Level sensors shall be mounted on the pump housing and be field serviceable without having to\n36 disassemble the pump.\n37 Part 3 -Execution\n38 Installation\n39 Install in accordance with manufacturers' printed instructions and manufacturers' representatives'\n40 guidance and recommendations.\n41 Construction Quality Control\n42 Construction General Contractor shall perform functional testing in accordance with approved testing\n43 plan. Functional testing shall be performed in the presence of the Construction Manager. Notify\n44 Construction Manager in writing at least 5 days in advance of testing.\n45 Function Tests:\nAppendix 4D. 150\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Prior to the pump and level transducer insertion tests identified in the Component CAT procedures,\n2 verify the LCRS, LDS, and SLDS riser pipe transition from the side slope to the horizontal portion of\n3 the riser pipe is adequate for leachate pump and level transducer insertion. Perform the pump/level\n4 transducer insertion tests prior to backfilling and after the riser pipe installation is finished from\n5 within the sump to a location approximately 50 feet up the side slope. Perform the pump/level\n6 transducer insertion tests using the associated leachate pump or level transducer for each riser. In\n7 addition to the level transducer insertion for the SLDS riser pipe, test the transition using the LDS\n8 low-flow leachate pump as well. If actual level transducers or leachate pumps are not available at the\n9 time of the testing, \"dummy\" level transducers and pumps can be used per approval from CHG\n10 Construction Manager.\n11 After complete installation of the side slope riser pipe from the sump to the crest pad building, verify\n12 exact length of pump discharge and level transducer piping required by using a long tape measure to\n13 measure actual dimension. Test the insertion and extraction of each pump from the side slope riser\n14 pipe and into the crest pad buildings. Perform testing while the perforated carrier pipe sections in the\n15 sumps are exposed to allow observation of the pump removals and insertions from the carrier pipe.\n16 Test the pumps under simulated conditions using a temporary tank located at the bottom of the\n17 landfill. Place pump in the tank and connect temporary flexible hose between the pump and\n18 discharge pipe routed up the side slope surface and between the discharge pipe and riser connection in\n19 Crest Pad Building. Keep the tank full to supply adequate water to the pumps during the pump test.\n20 Record amp draw readings.\n21 Supplements\n22 The supplements listed below, following \"END OF SECTION,\" are a part of this Specification.\n23 Data Sheets:\n24 Supplement 1-Leachate Pump Data Sheet, 11306-01.\n25 Supplement 2-Leachate Pump Data Sheet, 11306-02.\n26 Supplement 3-Leachate Pump Data Sheet, 11306-03.\n27 Supplement 4-Leachate Pump Data Sheet, 11306-04.\n28 END OF SECTION 11306\n29\nAppendix 4D. 151\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Leachate Pump Data Sheet, 11306-01\n2 Tag Numbers: 219A-LH-P-202, 219E-LH-P-202\n3 Pump Locations and I.D.: Cell I LCRS Sump, Low Flow\n4 Cell 2 LCRS Sump, Low Flow\n5 Manufacturer and Model Number: (1) EPG Companies; Model WSD 3-3\n6 (2) Or equal\n7 Service Conditions\n8 Liquid Pumped (Material and Percent): Leachate from low-level radioactive waste landfill\n9 Pumping Temperature (Fahrenheit): Normal: 55 F Max: 130 F Min: 27 F\n10 Specific Gravity at 60 Degrees F: 1.0 Viscosity Range: NA pH: 5.0-9.3\n11 Abrasive (Y/N) Y (infrequent fine soil particles) Possible Scale Buildup (Y/N): Y\n12 Total Suspended Solids (mg/1): 200 (estimated)\n13 Performance Requirements At Primary Design Point\n14 Capacity (US gpm): Rated: 13\n15 Total Dynamic Head (Ft): Rated: 66\n16 Min. Hydraulic Efficiency (%): 60\n17 Maximum Shutoff Pressure (Ft): 90\n18 Max. Pump Speed at Design Point (rpm): 3450\n19 Constant (Y/N: Y Adjustable (Y/N): N\n20\nAppendix 4D.152\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Design And Materials\n2 Design: Wheeled enclosure frame Back Pullout (Y/N) Y\n3 Discharge Orientation: Center\n4 Casing Materials: Type 304 SST\n5 Case Wear Ring (Y/N) NA Material: NA\n6 Impeller: Type: Closed Material: Type 304 SST\n7 Impeller Wear Ring (Y/N): Y Material: E-Glide (engineered plastic) or equal\n8 Shaft Material: Type 304 SST Shaft Sleeve Material: E-Glide or equal\n9 Shaft Seal: Y Ring Material: E-Glide or equal Lubrication: Fluid\n10 AFBMA B-10 Bearing Life (Hrs): NA Lubrication: NA\n11 Drive Type: Direct Coupled\n12 Induction Drive Motor\n13 Horsepower: 0.5 Voltage: 460 Phase: 3\n14 Speed (rpm): 34)\n15 Service Factor: 1.15 Inverter Duty (Y/N) N\n16 Motor nameplate horsepower shall not be exceeded at any head-capacity point on the pump curve.\n17 Enclosure: Submersible\n18\nAppendix 4D.153\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Leachate Pump Data Sheet, 11306-02\n2 Tag Numbers: 219A-LH-P-203, 219E-LH-P-203\n3 Pump Location and I.D.: Cell I LCRS Sump, Hijzh Flow\n4 Cell 2 LCRS Sump, High Flow\n5 Manufacturer and Model Number: (1) EPG Companies; Model WSD 30-4\n6 (2) Or equal\n7 Service Conditions\n8 Liquid Pumped (Material and Percent): Leachate from low-level radioactive waste landfill\n9 Pumping Temperature (Fahrenheit): Normal: 55 F Max: 130 F Min: 27 F\n10 Specific Gravity at 60 Degrees F: 1.0 Viscosity Range: NA pH: 5.0-9.3\n11 Abrasive (Y/N) Y (infrequent fine soil particles) Possible Scale Buildup (Y/N):Y\n12 Total Suspended Solids (mg/1): 200 (estimated)\n13 Performance Requirements At Primary Design Point\n14 Capacity (US gpm): Rated: 155\n15 Total Dynamic Head (Ft): Rated: 118\n16 Min. Hydraulic Efficiency (%): 60\n17 Maximum Shutoff Pressure (Ft): 208\n18 Max. Pump Speed at Design Point (rpm): 3,450\n19 Constant (Y/N): Y Adjustable (Y/N): N\n20\nAppendix 4D.154\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Design and Materials\n2 Design: Wheeled enclosure frame (YIN) Y\n3 Discharge Orientation: Center\n4 Casing Materials: Type 304 SST\n5 Case Wear Ring (YIN) NA Material: NA\n6 Impeller: Type: Closed Material: Type 304 SST\n7 Impeller Wear Ring (Y/N): Y Material: E-Glide (engineered plastic), or equal\n8 Shaft Material: Type 304 SST Shaft Sleeve Material: E-Glide (engineered plastic), or\n9 equal\n10 Shaft Seal: Y Ring Material: E-Glide or equal Lubrication: Fluid\n11 AFBMA B-10 Bearing Life (Hrs): NA Lubrication: NA\n12 Drive Type: Direct Coupled\n13 Induction Drive Motor\n14 Horsepower: 7.5 Voltage: 460 Phase: 3\n15 Speed (rpm): 3\n16 Service Factor: 1.15 Inverter Duty (Y/N) N\n17 Motor nameplate horsepower shall not be exceeded at any head-capacity point on the pump curve.\n18 Enclosure: Submersible\n19\n20\nAppendix 4D.155\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Leachate Pump Data Sheet, 11306-03\n2 Tag Numbers: 219A-LH-P-204, 219E-LH-P-204\n3 Pump Locations and I.D.: Cell I LDS Sump\n4 Cell 2 LDS Sump\n5 Manufacturer and Model Number: (1) EPG Companies; Model WSD 1.5-3\n6 (2) Or equal\n7 Service Conditions\n8 Liquid Pumped (Material and Percent): Leachate from low-level radioactive waste landfill\n9 Pumping Temperature (Fahrenheit): Normal: 55 F Max: 130 F Min: 27 F\n10 Specific Gravity at 60 Degrees F: 1.0 Viscosity Range: NA pH: 5.0-9.3\n11 Abrasive (Y/N) Y (infrequent fine soil particles) Possible Scale Buildup (Y/N): Y\n12 Total Suspended Solids (mg/1): 200 (estimated)\n13 Performance Requirements At Primary Design Point\n14 Capacity (US gpm): Rated: 4\n15 Total Dynamic Head (Ft): Rated: 65\n16 Min. Hydraulic Efficiency (%): 6\n17 Maximum Shutoff Pressure (Ft): 80\n18 Max. Pump Speed at Design Point (rpm): 3A\n19 Constant (Y/N): Y Adjustable (Y/N): N\nAppendix 4D.156\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Design And Materials\n2 Design: Wheeled enclosure frame Back Pullout (Y/N) Y\n3 Discharge Orientation: Center\n4 Casing Materials: Type 304 SST\n5 Case Wear Ring (Y/N) NA Material: NA\n6 Impeller: Type: Closed Material: Type 304 SST\n7 Impeller Wear Ring (Y/N): Y Material: E-Glide (engineered plastic) or equal\n8 Shaft Material: Type 304 SST Shaft Sleeve Material: E-Glide or equal\n9 Shaft Seal: Y Ring Material: E-Glide or equal Lubrication: Fluid\n10 AFBMA B-10 Bearing Life (Hrs): NA Lubrication: NA\n11 Drive Type: Direct Coupled\n12 Induction Drive Motor\n13 Horsepower: 0.5 Voltage: 460 Phase: 3\n14 Speed (rpm): 3\n15 Service Factor: 1.15 Inverter Duty (Y/N) N\n16 Motor nameplate horsepower shall not be exceeded at any head-capacity point on the pump curve.\n17 Enclosure: Submersible\nAppendix 4D.157\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Leachate Pump Data Sheet, 11306-04\n2 -Tag Numbers: 219-LH-P-208\n3 Pump Locations and I.D.: Cell I SLDS Sump\n4 Cell 2 SLDS Sump\n5 Manufacturer and Model Number: (1) EPG Companies; Model WSD 1.5-4\n6 (2) Or equal\n7 Service Conditions\n8 Liquid Pumped (Material and Percent): Leachate from low-level radioactive waste landfill\n9 Pumping Temperature (Fahrenheit): Normal: 55 F Max: 130 F Min: 27 F\n10 Specific Gravity at 60 Degrees F: 1.0 Viscosity Range: NA pH: 5.0-9.3\n11 Abrasive (Y/N) Y (infrequent fine soil particles) Possible Scale Buildup (Y/N): Y\n12 Total Suspended Solids (mg/1): 200 (estimated)\n13 Performance Requirements At Primary Design Point\n14 Capacity (US gpm): Rated: 4\n15 Total Dynamic Head (Ft): Rated: 65\n16 Min. Hydraulic Efficiency (%): 0\n17 Maximum Shutoff Pressure (Ft): 80\n18 Max. Pump Speed at Design Point (rpm): 3,450\n19 Constant (YIN): Y Adjustable (Y/N): N\n20\nAppendix 4D.158\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Design and Materials\n2 Design: Wheeled enclosure frame Back Pullout (Y/N) Y\n3 Discharge Orientation: Center\n4 Casing Materials: Type 304 SST\n5 Case Wear Ring (Y/N) NA Material: NA\n6 Impeller: Type: Closed Material: Type 304 SST\n7 Impeller Wear Ring (Y/N): Y Material: E-Glide (engineered plastic) or equal\n8 Shaft Material: Type 304 SST Shaft Sleeve Material: E-Glide or equal\n9 Shaft Seal: Y Ring Material: E-Glide or equal Lubrication: Fluid\n10 AFBMA B-10 Bearing Life (Hrs): NA Lubrication: NA\n11 Drive Type: Direct Coupled\n12 Induction Drive Motor\n13 Horsepower: 0.5 Voltage: 120 Phase: 1\n14 Speed (rpm): 34\n15 Service Factor: 1.15 Inverter Duty (Y/N) N\n16 Motor nameplate horsepower shall not be exceeded at any head-capacity point on the pump curve.\n17 Enclosure: Submersible\n18 Note: An adequate length of power cord shall be supplied. Standard plug shall be provided on the power\n19 cord.\n20\nAppendix 4D.159\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI SECTION 11312 -HORIZONTAL END SUCTION CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS SCHED. B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 References\n4 The following is a list of standards, which may be referenced in this section:\n5 AMERICAN BEARING MANUFACTURERS' ASSOCIATION (ABMA)\n6 AMERICAN IRON AND STEEL INSTITUTE (AISI)\n7 Type 416 Stainless Steel\n8 Type 1035 Steel\n9 Type 1045 Carbon Steel\n10 Type 4140 Alloy Steel\n11 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n12 ASTM A48 Standard Specification for Gray Iron Castings\n13 ASTM A53/A53M Standard Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated,\n14 Welded and Seamless\n15 ASTM A276 Standard Specification for Stainless Steel Bars and Shapes\n16 ASTM A576 Standard Specification for Steel Bars, Carbon, Hot-Wrought, Special Quality\n17 ASTM B62 Standard Specification for Composition Bronze or Ounce Metal Castings\n18 ASTM B148 Standard Specification for Aluminum-Bronze Sand Castings\n19 ASTM B584 Standard Specification for Copper Alloy Sand Castings for General\n20 Applications\n21 HYDRAULIC INSTITUTE STANDARDS\n22 INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS (IEEE)\n23 IEEE 112 Standard Test Procedure for Polyphase Induction Motors and Generators\n24 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURER'S ASSOCIATION (NEMA)\n25 NEMA MG I Motors and Generators\n26 Definitions\n27 Terminology pertaining to pumping unit performance and construction shall conform to the ratings and\n28 nomenclature of the Hydraulic Institute Standards.\n29 Submittals-Approval Required\n30 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n31 Make, model, weight, and horsepower of each equipment assembly.\n32 Complete catalog information, descriptive literature, specifications, and identification of materials of\n33 construction.\n34 Performance data curves showing head, capacity, horsepower demand, and pump efficiency over the\n35 entire operating range of the pump, from shutoff to maximum capacity. Indicate separately the head,\n36 capacity, horsepower demand, overall efficiency, and minimum submergence required at the\n37 guarantee point.\n38 Detailed mechanical and electrical drawings showing the equipment dimensions, size, and locations\n39 of connections and weights of associated equipment.\nAppendix 4D.160\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Functional testing plan demonstrating compliance with requirements specified herein.\n2 Power and control wiring diagrams, including terminals and numbers.\n3 Complete motor nameplate data, as defined by NEMA, motor manufacturer.\n4 Results of source quality control testing.\n5 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n6 Information/Record (IR):\n7 Special shipping, storage and protection, and handling instructions.\n8 Manufacturer's Certificate of Proper Installation.\n9 Results of field quality control testing.\n10 Vendor Information (VI):\n11 Suggested spare parts list to maintain the equipment in service for a period of 5 years. Include a list\n12 of special tools required for checking, testing, parts replacement, and maintenance with current price\n13 information.\n14 List special tools, materials, and supplies furnished with equipment for use prior to and during startup\n15 and for future maintenance.\n16 Manufacturer's printed installation instructions.\n17 Operation and maintenance data, including recommended preventative maintenance tasks and\n18 frequencies for performance of those tasks.\n19 Factory finish system data sheets.\n20 Extra Materials\n21 Furnish for each pump:\n22 Complete set packing.\n23 Complete set bearings.\n24 Complete set gaskets and O-ring seals.\n25 Complete set of shaft sleeves.\n26 Complete set keys, dowels, pins, etc.\n27 Complete mechanical seal.\n28 Impeller.\n29 Impeller shaft.\n30 Impeller wear ring.\n31 Head shaft.\n32 One complete set of any special tools required to dismantle pump.\n33 Part 2 -Products\n34 General\n35 Coordinate pump requirements with drive manufacturer and be responsible for pump and drive\n36 requirements.\n37 Where adjustable speed drives are required, furnish a coordinated operating system complete with pump,\n38 drive, and speed controller.\n39 Supplements\n40 Some specific requirements are attached to this section as supplements.\nAppendix 4D.161\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Accessories\n2 Equipment Identification Plate: 16-gauge stainless steel with 1/4-inch die-stamped equipment tag\n3 number securely mounted in a readily visible location.\n4 Lifting Lugs: Equipment weighing over 100 pounds.\n5 Anchor Bolts: Galvanized, sized by equipment manufacturer, 1/2-inch minimum diameter, and as\n6 specified in Section 05500, METAL FABRICATIONS AND CASTINGS.\n7 Factory Finishing\n8 Manufacturer's standard enamel finish.\n9 Source Quality Control\n10 Construction General Contractor shall perform source quality control testing at the factory as specified\n11 herein. Notify Construction Manager at least 10 days in advance of testing.\n12 Performance Test: Perform manufacturer's standard motor test on equipment.\n13 Part 3 -Execution\n14 Installation\n15 Install in accordance with manufacturer's printed instructions.\n16 Level base by means of steel wedges (steel plates and steel shims). Wedge taper not greater than\n17 1/4 inch per foot. Use double wedges to provide a level bearing surface for pump and driver base.\n18 Accomplish wedging so that there is no change of level or springing of the baseplate when the anchor\n19 bolts are tightened.\n20 Adjust pump assemblies such that the driving units are properly aligned, plumb, and level with the\n21 driven units and all interconnecting shafts and couplings. Do not compensate for misalignment by\n22 use of flexible couplings.\n23 After pump and driver have been set in position, aligned, and shimmed to proper elevation, grout the\n24 space between the bottom of the baseplate and the concrete foundation with a poured, nonshrinking\n25 grout. Remove wedges after grout is set and pack void with grout.\n26 Connect suction and discharge piping without imposing strain to pump flanges.\n27 Anchor Bolts: Accurately place using equipment templates and as specified in Section 05500, METAL\n28 FABRICATIONS AND CASTINGS.\n29 Construction Quality Control\n30 Construction General Contractor shall perform field quality control testing in accordance with approved\n31 testing plan. Functional testing shall be performed in the presence of the Construction Manager. Notify\n32 Construction Manager in writing at least 5 days in advance of testing.\n33 Functional Tests:\n34 Conduct on each pump.\n35 Test for a continuous 1/2-hour period without malfunction.\n36 Test Log: Record the following:\n37 Total head.\n38 Capacity.\n39 Flow measured by factory instrumentation and/or storage volumes.\n40 Average distance from suction well water surface to pump discharge centerline for duration of test.\nAppendix 4D.162\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Pump discharge pressure converted to feet of liquid pumped and corrected to pump discharge\n2 centerline.\n3 Driving motor voltage and amperage measured for each phase.\n4 Alignment: Test complete assemblies for correct rotation, proper alignment and connection, and quiet\n5 operation.\n6 Operating Temperatures: Monitor bearing areas on pump and motor for abnormally high temperatures.\n7 Manufacturer's Services\n8 Manufacturer's Representative: Present at site or classroom designated by Tank Farm Contractor, for\n9 minimum person-days listed below, travel time excluded:\n10 Person-day for installation assistance and inspection.\n11 Person-day for functional and performance testing and completion of Manufacturer's Certificate of\n12 Proper Installation.\n13 Supplements\n14 The supplements listed below, following \"END OF SECTION,\" are a part of this Specification.\n15 Pump Data Sheet, 11312-01\n16 END OF SECTION 11312\n17\nAppendix 4D.163\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Horizontal End Suction Centrifugal Pump Data Sheet, 11312-01\n2 Tag Numbers:\n3 Pump Name:\n4 Manufacturer and Model Number: (1)\n5 (2)\n6 Service Conditions\n7 Liquid Pumped (Material and Percent):\n8 Pumping Temperature (Fahrenheit): Normal: 55 Max 130 Min 27\n9 Specific Gravity at 60 Degrees F: 1.0 Viscosity Range: N/A pH: 5.0-9.3\n10 Abrasive (Y/N) Y (fine soil particles) Possible Scale Buildup (YIN): Y\n11 Total suspended solids (mg/L) 200 (estimated)\n12 Largest diameter solid pump can pass (inches) .25\n13 Performance Requirements At Primary Design Point\n14 Capacity (US gpm): Rated: 250\n15 Total Dynamic Head (Ft): Rated: 25\n16 Min. Hydraulic Efficiency (%): 75\n17 Maximum Shutoff Pressure (Ft): 40\n18 Max. Pump Speed at Design Point (rpm): 1,5O\n19 Constant (Y/N): Y Adjustable (Y/N): N\n20 Design And Materials\n21 ANSI (Y/N) Y Standard (Y/N) Y Design: Frame-mounted (Y/N) Y\n22 Close-Coupled Casing (YIN) N Back Pullout (Y/N) Y\n23 Discharge Orientation: 12:00 Rotation (view from end coupling): CW\n24 Shaft Seal: Packing (Y/N) N\n25 Mechanical (Y/N)\n26 Lubrication: Process Water\n27 Drive Type: Direct-Coupled: Belt Adjustable Speed\n28 Induction Drive Motor\n29 Horsepower: Voltage: Phase: Speed (rpm): 1,750\n30 Service Factor: 1.15 Inverter Duty (Y/N)\n31 Motor nameplate horsepower shall not be exceeded at any head-capacity point on the pump curve.\n32 Enclosure: Totally enclosed fan cooled\n33 Mounting Type: Horizontal Nonreverse Ratchet (Y/N)\nAppendix 4D.164\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Testing\n2 Pump Tests: Factory Functional (Y/N) Field Performance (Y/N) N\n3 Factory Hydrostatic Casing Pressure Test (Y/N)\n4 Field Functional (YIN) _ Field Performance (YIN)\n5 Field Vibration (Y/N) N\nAppendix 4D.165\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nDIVISION 12-FURNISHINGS (NOT USED)\nAppendix 4D.166\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nDIVISION 13-SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION\nAppendix 4D.167\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 13122 -METAL BUILDING SYSTEMS SCHED. B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 Work Included\n4 The Construction Subcontractor shall furnish and install four prefabricated pre-engineered metal building,\n5 complete, as shown on the Drawings and as specified herein.\n6 References\n7 The following Codes and Standards, including others referenced therein, form a part of this Section to the\n8 extent specified herein:\n9 AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION (AISC)\n10 AISC Specification for Structural Steel for Buildings -Allowable Stress Design (ASD)\n11 AMERICAN IRON AND STEEL INSTITUTE (AISI)\n12 AISI Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members\n13 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n14 ASTM A36 Standard Specification for Carbon Structural Steel\n15 ASTM A53 Standard Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Welded\n16 and Seamless\n17 ASTM A325 Standard Specification for Structural Bolts, Steel, Heat-Treated, 120/105 ksi\n18 Minimum Tensile Strength\n19 ASTM A500 Standard Specification for Cold-Formed Welded and Seamless Carbon Steel\n20 Structural Tubing in Rounds and Shapes\n21 ASTM A501 Standard Specification for Hot-Formed Welded and Seamless Carbon Steel Structural\n22 Tubing\n23 ASTM A529 Standard Specification for High-Strength Carbon-Manganese Steel of Structural\n24 Quality\n25 ASTM A570 Standard Specification for Steel, Sheet and Strip, Carbon, Hot-Rolled, Structural\n26 Quality\n27 ASTM A572 Standard Specification for High-Strength, Low-Alloy Columbium-Vanadium\n28 Structural Steel\n29 ASTM A607 Standard Specification for Steel, Sheet and Strip, High-Strength, Low-Alloy,\n30 Columbium or Vanadium, or Both, Hot-Rolled, and Cold-Rolled\n31 ASTM F959 Standard Specification for Compressible-Washer-Type Direct Tension Indicator for\n32 Use with Structural Fasteners\n33 AMERICAN WELDING SOCIETY (AWS)\n34 AWS DL.1 Structural Welding Code -Steel\n35 METAL BUILDING MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION (MBMA)\n36 Recommended Design Practices Manual, for applicable loads and load combinations\n37 Metal Building Systems Manual, for collateral loads\n38 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS (ICBO)\n39 UBC, Uniform Building Code\nAppendix 4D. 168\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 STEEL DOOR INSTITUTE (SDI)\n2 SDI 100 Recommended Specifications for Standard Steel Doors and Frames\n3 SDI 117 Manufacturing Tolerances Standard Steel Doors and Frames\n4 Submittals-Approval Required\n5 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n6 Shop Drawings:\n7 Manufacturer's Standard Details and Structural Calculations: Clearly mark those portions that apply\n8 to specific Project and those parts that do not apply.\n9 Manufacturer's Literature and Technical Data: Drawings and Specifications for proposed metal\n10 building system.\n11 Painting System: Specifications including paint manufacturer's name, product trade-name, and\n12 preparation for shop and field coats. Provide minimum 20 color samples for Tank Farm Contractor to\n13 choose.\n14 Drawings Stamped by Engineer Registered in the State of Washington and Prepared Specifically\n15 for this Project:\n16 Materials and Details: Show materials, details of components (including doors and other accessories),\n17 finishes, fastenings, methods of joining, sealants, anchor bolt, shear angle, and baseplate details including\n18 all sizes and dimensions, size and location of structural members and bracing, wall structural members,\n19 bracing, openings, and structural wind columns as required.\n20 Calculations Stamped by Engineer Registered in the State of Washington: Complete structural stress\n21 and deflection analysis of structural components and connections; consider prying action of bolts should\n22 proposed design use bolted moment-resistant connections in main frames. Provide anchor bolt\n23 calculations and separately tabulate anchor bolt reaction for all case loads and load combinations.\n24 Samples: Minimum 2-inch by 3-inch metal for components requiring color selection.\n25 Submit documentation of construction quality control testing as specified herein.\n26 Submiftals-Approval Not Required\n27 Information/Record (IR):\n28 Statements of Qualification:\n29 Documentation of past 5 years' experience record to include project name, location, type and date\n30 completed, building manufacturer and owner's contact person.\n31 Certification of approval by manufacturer.\n32 Vendor Information (VI):\n33 Manufacturer's written instructions for shipping, handling, storage, protection and erection or\n34 installation of building and components.\n35 Manufacturer's certification or proof of current membership in Metal Building Manufacturer's\n36 Association (MBMA).\n37 Manufacturer's Certificate of Proper Installation.\n38 Operations and maintenance manual.\nAppendix 4D.169\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Qualifications\n2 Provide prefabricated metal buildings as produced by a manufacturer who is regularly engaged in\n3 fabrication of pre-engineered metal structures of type and quality indicated. All components shall be\n4 provided from one manufacturer.\n5 Warranties\n6 Warranty shall begin at the time of Substantial Completion.\n7 The roofing and siding shall be warranted for a minimum of 5 years against wind damage, leakage, paint\n8 fade, chipping, peeling, attachment and rusting. Warranty shall include labor and materials for\n9 replacement of defective panels. Warranty shall not be pro-rated over 5-year period.\n10 Finish on metal roof and wall panels, flashing, and trim will not chalk, crack, check, blister, peel, flake,\n11 chip, or loose adhesion shall be warrantied for 5 years.\n12 Part 2 -Products\n13 Manufacturer\n14 Dimensions of the 12-foot by 12-foot buildings are based on Panl-Line Building System as manufactured\n15 by Butler Manufacturing Co. Dimension and sizes of the 21-foot by 16-foot buildings are based on the\n16 Parkline Building Systems, Inc. (Type AL), and VP Buildings, Inc. If an \"or equal\" building\n17 manufacturer is submitted and approved by the Engineer, all dimensions and clearances shall be taken as\n18 minimums for evaluation of submittal. Construction Subcontractor shall be responsible for all\n19 adjustments required to plans as a consequence of changing building manufacturer. All shop drawings\n20 and special process procedures as welding, painting and structural bolting, shall be submitted for approval\n21 and shall be stamped by a registered professional engineer licensed to practice in the State of Washington.\n22 Type: The metal building shall be a prefabricated, weather-tight, free-standing building having a\n23 structural steel frame. The 12-foot by 12-foot buildings shall be self-framing buildings incorporating\n24 diagonal bracing. The 21-foot by 16-foot buildings shall be rigid frame in all walls with no diagonal\n25 bracing in the wall. The roof slope and the eave height shall be at as specified on Construction Drawings.\n26 Design Loads\n27 The building shall be designed for the following applied loads in addition to dead load:\n28 Roof Live Loads: Roof covering shall be designed for 20 psf uniformly distributed load.\n29 Roof Snow Load: Ground snow load is 15 psf, Ce = 10, I = 0.8 designed per ASCE 7.\n30 Wind Loads: The wind load on the structure shall be designed per ASCE 7 and DOE STD-1020-02\n31 using a 3-second gust wind velocity of 85-mph wind speed. Design and calculate according to the\n32 ASCE 7 exposure Class \"C\" with an Importance Factor = 1.0.\n33 Seismic Loads: Seismic loads shall be determined and applied in accordance with the UBC Zone 2B,\n34 Importance Factor = 1.0, Soil S.. Out-of-plane system stability, nonstructural components, and equipment\n35 shall be evaluated using UBC 1632.\n36 Collateral Loads: All additional dead loads, other than the weight of the metal building system, such as\n37 fire sprinklers, mechanical HVAC systems, electrical systems, and ceilings. Collateral loads shall be a\n38 minimum of 10 pounds per square foot as defined in the Metal Building Systems Manual published by the\n39 MBMA.\n40 Maximum Deflection: Deflection shall be limited to L/240 for DL and DL+LL for all building\n41 components.\n42 Combination of Loads: Combined loads shall be as prescribed in the UBC.\nAppendix 4D. 170\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Building Code Requirement: Design building, roof system, roof overhang including support framing,\n2 roof and wall panels, and fasteners for horizontal and uplift wind loads and earthquake forces.\n3 Materials\n4 Hot-Rolled Structural Shapes: Conform to ASTM A36 or A529.\n5 Tubing or Pipe: Conform to ASTM A500, Grade B; ASTM A501, or ASTM A53.\n6 Members Fabricated from Plate or Bar Stock: 42,000 psi minimum yield strength; Conform to\n7 ASTM A529, A570, or A572.\n8 Members Fabricated by Cold Forming: Conform to ASTM A607, Grade 50.\n9 Galvanized Steel Sheet: Conform to ASTM A446 with G90 coating. \"Class\" to suit building\n10 manufacturer's standards.\n11 Structural Framing Components\n12 Rigid Frames:\n13 Rigid frames shall be hot-rolled structural steel, factory welded, and shop painted. Furnish complete with\n14 attachment plates, bearing plates, and splice members. Factory drilled for bolted field assembly.\n15 Length of span and spacing of frames shall be as shown on Drawings except slight roof slope variations\n16 are acceptable to meet manufacturer's standard.\n17 Wind Bracing: No \"x\" type rod bracing shall be used in bays where bracing would cross windows or\n18 door openings, or where the interior of the exterior walls are to be finished. Use portal frames where\n19 bracing is required at window or door openings.\n20 Secondary Framing: Purlins, eave girts, girts, flange and sag bracings shall be \"Z\" or \"C\" roll formed\n21 sections no pre-punched for fasteners, and shall be shop prime painted. Roof purlins shall be spaced a\n22 maximum of 5-foot 0-inch O.C. Base channel, sill angle, purlin spacers; minimum 14-gauge cold-formed\n23 steel; and shall be shop prime painted.\n24 Anchor Bolts: The anchor bolts for the rigid frames shall be carbon steel and designed by the pre-\n25 engineered building manufacturer. Location and placement shall be coordinated with the foundation\n26 rebar shown on the Drawings. Any changes in rebar placement shall be brought to the attention of the\n27 Construction Subcontractor and engineering calculations shall be provided taking into account the\n28 changed rebar location.\n29 Bolts: Bolts shall be ASTM A325 in quantities necessary for design loads and connection details.\n30 Provide zinc- or cadmium-plated units when in direct contact with panels. Direct tension indicators shall\n31 conform to ASTM F959.\n32 Fabrication:\n33 Shop fabricate to the indicated size and section, complete with base plates, bearing plates, and other plates\n34 as required for erection, welded in place, and with all required holes for anchoring or connections shop\n35 drilled or punched to template dimensions.\n36 Shop connections shall be power riveted, bolted, or welded.\n37 Field connections shall be bolted. Install high strength threaded fasteners in accordance with\n38 \"Specifications for Structural Joints Using ASTM A325 or A490 Bolts.\"\n39 Weld Construction:\n40 Comply with AWS D 1.1 for procedures, appearance and quality of welds, and methods used in\n41 connecting welding work. Welding shall not be performed at the project site.\nAppendix 4D.171\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Construction General Contractor shall provide Certified Weld Inspector (CWI) to perform visual\n2 examination of all off-site welds in accordance with AWS D1.1, Section 6. Document weld acceptance\n3 on Construction Subcontractor Weld History.\n4 Shop Painting:\n5 Surfaces to be primed shall be cleaned of loose mill scale, rust, dirt, oil, grease, and other matter\n6 precluding paint bond. Follow procedures of SSPC-SP3 for power tool cleaning, SSPC-SP7 for\n7 brush-off blast cleaning, and SSCP-SPI for solvent cleaning.\n8 Prime structural steel primary and secondary framing members with manufacturer's standard rust-\n9 inhibitive primer having over 50 percent rust-inhibitive pigment, such as organic zinc. No lead or\n10 chromate will be allowed.\n11 Prime galvanized members, after phosphoric acid pretreatment, with zinc dust-zinc oxide primer.\n12 Roofing And Siding\n13 General: Provide roofing and siding sheets formed to general profile or configuration as specified.\n14 Provide flashings, closers, fillers, ridge covers, and other sheet metal accessories, factory formed of same\n15 material and finish as roofing and siding. Factory-applied baked enamel, in color selected by the\n16 Engineer.\n17 Roof Panels:\n18 The Interlocking-Standing Seam Roof Covering shall carry an Underwriters' Laboratories, Inc., Uplift\n19 Classification of not less than Class 90 and shall consist of material not less than 24-gauge aluminized\n20 coated steel with Kynar finish on exterior face. The panels shall be installed with the ribs upstanding\n21 and parallel to the roof slope.\n22 All longitudinal interlocking ribs as well as any transverse end laps shall be properly sealed,\n23 according to the manufacturer's instructions, with non-drying sealant.\n24 The roof panels shall be secured to each structural support by a steel clip concealed between the\n25 adjacent male and female ribs and fastened under that panel's weather surface. Clip shall be long\n26 enough to allow Styrofoam thermal spacer on top of purlin.\n27 Penetrations through the roof panel by fasteners shall be limited to only those required at the rake\n28 eaves, at end laps and at the ridge. All exposed fasteners shall be fitted with weather-seal washers of\n29 hydrocarbon-based elastomer (synthetic rubber) with a compatible metal backing.\n30 Thermal (break) spacers shall be provided continuously at each structural support to minimize\n31 thermal conductivity. The thermal spacer shall be a continuous Styrofoam strip, 3 inches by 1 inch\n32 thick.\n33 Wall Panels Exterior: The interlocking-ribbed wall covering shall consist of panels of not less than\n34 24 U.S. gauge, fluoropolymer enamel finished, aluminized coated steel with male and female ribs. The\n35 wall panels shall be applied to the structural framing with the interlocking ribs toward the interior of the\n36 structure. The interlocking ribs shall be secured at the base, at each intermediate girt, and at the support at\n37 which it terminates, by means of concealed fasteners, thus eliminating any through-wall fastening. Trim\n38 finish to match wall panel.\n39 All interior fasteners, i.e., screws, bolts and nuts, etc., shall be of carbon steel having a protective coating\n40 of either zinc or cadmium.\n41 Interior Liner Panels: Interior wall liner panels shall be provided throughout the building on all\n42 perimeter walls. The panels shall be 24 gauge, white with concealed fasteners. All panel joints shall be\n43 provided with sealer along the edges of each panel. The liner panels shall function as a vapor barrier.\n44 Length of panels shall be full height with no horizontal joints. Finish shall be as described below.\nAppendix 4D. 172\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Sealing Tape: Sealing tape shall be 100 percent solids, pressure sensitive grey polyisobutylene\n2 compound tape with release paper backing. Not less than 1/2 inch wide and 1/4 inch thick, nonsag,\n3 nontoxic, nonstaining and permanently elastic.\n4 Joint Sealant: Joint sealant shall be one-part elastomeric; polyurethane, polysulfide, or silicon rubber as\n5 recommended by building manufacturer.\n6 Ice Stops: Provide ice stops to prevent snow and ice damage to gutters. Ice stops shall be \"ICEJAX\" as\n7 manufactured by Snowjax Inc., Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania, or approved equal. \"ICEJAX\" shall be\n8 adhered with Loctite \"Depend\", or approved equal, to metal roof panels.\n9 Rain Gutter and Downspouts: The rain gutter shall be continuous along the eaves of the building. The\n10 gutter shall be a surface mounted type with downspout size and number as called for by the building\n11 manufacturer or as shown on the drawings. Gutter shall be minimum 5 x 5 inches in cross section.\n12 Gutter and downspouts shall be standard design as manufactured by Metal Building Manufacturer, or\n13 approved equal. Gutter shall be installed with 1/4 inch per 10-foot 0-inch slope to downspout. Factory\n14 finish to match wall panels.\n15 Insulation And Vapor Retarder\n16 As specified in Section 07210, BUILDING INSULATION.\n17 Doors\n18 Steel Doors: 1-3/4-inch doors, conforming to ANSI/SDI 100, with manufacturer's standard. Provide\n19 exterior doors with top and bottom edges finished flush. Provide doors of materials and ANSI/SDI 100\n20 grades and models specified below, or as indicated on drawings and schedules.\n21 Exterior Doors: Unless otherwise indicated, Grade III, extra heavy duty, Model 2 (seamless) design),\n22 minimum 16 gauge galvanized steel sheet faces.\n23 Door Frames\n24 Provide metal frames for doors and other openings according to ANSI/SDI 100 and of types and styles as\n25 shown on drawings and schedules. Conceal fastenings unless otherwise indicated. Frames shall be\n26 No. 14 USS gage or heavier cold-rolled steel sheet. Form exterior frames of hot dip galvanized steel.\n27 Fabricate frames with mitered and welded corners.\n28 Available manufacturers of steel doors include the following:\n29 AMWELD Building Products Div.\n30 Ceco Corp.\n31 Curries\n32 Fenestra\n33 Republic Builders Products Corp.\n34 Steelcraft Mfg. Co.\n35 Thermal-Rated (Insulating) Assemblies: At all exterior locations, provide doors, which have been\n36 fabricated as thermal insulating door and frame assemblies and tested in accordance with ASTM C 236 or\n37 ASTM C 976. Unless otherwise indicated, provide assemblies with maximum apparent U factor for\n38 thermal-rated assemblies is 0.24 Btu/hr (ft2) degrees F.\n39 Heating, Ventilating, And Air Conditioning System\n40 As specified in Section 15500, HEATING, VENTILATING, AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM.\n41 Fixed Louvers\n42 Material: Factory finish to match wall panels.\nAppendix 4D.173\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Free Airflow: Minimum 50 percent.\n2 Weather Projection: Drainage-type louver.\n3 Insect Screen: Manufacturer's standard 14-Ga to 18-Ga galvanized steel wire mesh screen.\n4 Pipe Penetrations\n5 For pipe penetrations through the roof use a \"DEKTITE\" pipe flashing unit as manufactured by ITW\n6 Buildex, or approved equal. Provide a stainless steel hose clamp for positive sealing of flashing to pipe.\n7 Wall Penetrations\n8 Provide opening as required by HVAC air conditioning manufacturer.\n9 Electrical And Lightinq\n10 As specified in Section 16005, ELECTRICAL.\n11 Part 3 -Execution\n12 Erection\n13 Framing: Erect structural framing true to line, level and plumb, rigid and secure. Level base plates to a\n14 true even plane with full bearing to supporting structures, set with double-nutted anchor bolts. Use a non-\n15 shrinking grout as specified in Section 03301, CONCRETE, to obtain uniform bearing and to maintain a\n16 level base line elevation. Moist cure grout for not less than 7 days after placement.\n17 Bracing:\n18 Install diagonal rod or angle bracing in roof as required.\n19 Diagonal/rod bracing shall not interfere with ceiling purlins.\n20 Install portal frame bracing in sidewalls as specified.\n21 Framed Openings: Provide shapes of proper design and size to reinforce opening and to carry loads and\n22 vibrations imposed, including equipment furnished under mechanical or electrical work. Securely attach\n23 to building structural frame.\n24 Roofing and Sidinq\n25 General:\n26 Install panels and associated items for neat and weather tight enclosure. Avoid \"panel creep\" or\n27 application not true to line. Protect factory finish from damage.\n28 Provide weather seal under ridge cap. Flash and seal roof panels at eave, swaged joints and rake with\n29 manufacturer's standard rubber, neoprene, or other closures to exclude weather.\n30 Roof Sheets:\n31 Provide sealant tape at lapped joints of ribbed or fluted roof sheets, and between roof sheeting and\n32 accessories.\n33 Apply sealant tape continuous to clean, dry surface of weather side of fastenings on end laps and on\n34 sidelaps of corrugated or nesting type, ribbed or fluted panels and elsewhere to make weatherproof to\n35 driving rains.\n36 Wall Sheets:\n37 Apply elastomeric sealant continuous between metal base channel (sill angle) and concrete\n38 foundation and elsewhere as necessary for waterproofing. Handle and apply sealant and backup in\n39 accordance with sealant manufacturer's recommendations.\n40 Align bottoms of wall panels. Fasten flashings, trim around openings, etc., with self-tapping screws.\nAppendix 4D.174\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Provide small quantities of paint material and touch-up coatings damaged during construction in\n2 accordance with the manufacturer's direction.\n3 Sheet Metal Accessories: Install louvers and other sheet metal accessories in accordance with\n4 manufacturer's recommendations for positive anchorage to building and weather tight mounting.\n5 Interior Wall Liner Panels: Install all wall liner panels as shown on the Drawings.\n6 Certification: The Construction Subcontractor shall submit a certified statement that all standing seam\n7 metal roofing, flashings, rain gutter and downspout, wall panels, structural framing, and anchor bolts have\n8 been installed in strict accordance with the manufacturer's printed instructions and this specification.\n9 Door Installation: Fit hollow metal doors accurately in frames, within clearance specified in SDI-100.\n10 Hardware Schedule\n11 Group No. 2:\n12 Butts: 1-1/2 pair McKinney T4A3386 4.5 x 4.5 x BIMA 630.\n13 Lockset: 1 Best 84-7-C-15D-S3 x BHMA 626.\n14 Closer: 1 LCN P4041 x BHMA 673.\n15 Rain Drip: 1 Pemko 346C.\n16 Kick Plate: 1 SST-10 inches high by 0.05 inch thick.\n17 Weather-stripping: I set Pemko 319CN x S88 x BHMA 628.\n18 Door Bottom: I Pemko 430CRL x BHMA 628.\n19 Threshold: I Pemko 254X4AFG x BHMA 628.\n20 Construction Quality Control\n21 High Strength Bolted Connections: Construction General Contractor shall provide special inspections\n22 to verify field connections with high strength bolts are installed in accordance with plans and\n23 specifications and AISC requirements.\n24 END OF SECTION 13122\n25\nAppendix 4D.175\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI SECTION 13205- LINED BOLTED STEEL LIQUID STORAGE TANKS SCHED. B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 References\n4 The publications listed below form a part of this Specification to the extent referenced. The publications\n5 are referred to in the text by basic designations only.\n6 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION (AWWA)\n7 AWWA D103 Factory-Coated Bolted Steel Tanks for Water Storage\n8 AWWA D130 Flexible-Membrane-Lining and Floating-Cover Materials for Potable Water\n9 Storage\n10 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n11 ASTM A446 Steel Sheet, Zinc-Coated by the Hot-Dip Process, Structural quality\n12 ASTM A525 General Requirements for Steel Sheet, Zinc-Coated by the Hot-Dip Process\n13 ASTM D413 Standard Test Methods for Rubber Property-Adhesion to Flexible Substrate\n14 ASTM D751 Standard Test Method for Coated Fabrics\n15 FEDERAL STANDARDS (FS)\n16 FS 5100 Preservation and Packing of Hand Tools; Tools and Tool Accessories for\n17 Power-Driven Metal Woodworking Machinery\n18 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS\n19 UBC Uniform Building Code\n20 Description\n21 This Specification sets the minimum standards for design and construction of two lined, bolted liquid\n22 storage tanks. The tanks shall be constructed from corrugated galvanized steel panels bolted together\n23 such that no field welding or onsite coating is required. The system shall provide an interior geosynthetic\n24 fabric to protect the factory fabricated membrane liner. A tank primary and secondary liner system shall\n25 be utilized.\n26 Qualifications\n27 Tank Manufacturer: At least five tanks presently in service, of similar size and character required for\n28 this Project, and minimum of 5 years' satisfactory operation.\n29 Tank Installer: Certified by tank manufacturer that installer is qualified to do the work.\n30 Registered Professional Engineer: Licensed in the state of Project with training and expertise in tank\n31 system design and installation. Able to recognize signs of potential tank system failure during the\n32 intended operating life of the tank. Able to assess and interpret information on the waste to be stored in\n33 the tank and the waste compatibility with the materials used for the tank and piping system.\n34 Installation Inspector: Knowledge of the physical sciences and the principals of engineering acquired\n35 by a professional education and related practical experience. Trained and experienced in the proper\n36 installation of tank systems or components. Certified by tank manufacturer that the inspector is qualified\n37 and experienced in type of Work to be performed.\n38 Submittals-Approval Required\n39 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n40 Statements of Qualifications:\nAppendix 4D.176\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Tank manufacturer.\n2 Tank installer.\n3 Registered professional engineer.\n4 Installation inspector.\n5 Tank Secondary and Primary Liners and Floating Cover:\n6 Material Samples: Within 15 days from Notice to Proceed: Samples of the materials proposed for use.\n7 Submit fifty (50) sample coupons, each 8 inches by 10 inches in size, for use by the Engineer to conduct\n8 leachate compatibility testing.\n9 Manufacturer's Data: Manufacturer's descriptive data, specifications sheets, literature, and other data as\n10 necessary to fully demonstrate that those materials proposed for use comply with the requirements of\n11 these Specifications.\n12 Installation Plan: Submit an installation plan for the liners and cover describing the proposed methods\n13 for liner and cover deployment, panel layout, seaming, repair, and protection. The plan shall also include\n14 a quality control program for the Construction General Contractor's activities related to liner and cover\n15 materials installation.\n16 Factory Fabrication Inspection Data (Source Quality Control): Submit documentation of factory\n17 inspection as specified herein.\n18 Drawings:\n19 Tank and Equipment: Detailed drawings for tanks, anchor bolts and anchor bolt chains, and equipment,\n20 such as wall construction, pipe connections, floating cover, floating cover water removal system,\n21 secondary containment system, and stilling wells for installation of level controls shall be stamped by the\n22 Registered Professional Engineer. Level controls are provided by others (see Section 13401, PICS).\n23 Drawings shall include a complete list of equipment and materials, including manufacturer's descriptive\n24 and technical literature, and installation instructions.\n25 Calculations: Stamped by the Registered Professional Engineer. Complete structural stress analysis of\n26 structural components and connections and anchorage system to the concrete ringwall. Include anchor\n27 bolt reaction for all load cases and load combinations.\n28 Design Assessment Report:\n29 A written report providing the results of the tank system design assessment prepared and certified by the\n30 Registered Professional Engineer attesting that the tanks furnished under this section of the Specifications\n31 has sufficient structural integrity and is acceptable for the storing and treating of dangerous waste.\n32 The assessment report shall contain the following:\n33 Site map of the facility showing the proposed location of the tank system within the overall facility.\n34 A sketch of the tank system including connected piping and fittings. Individual tanks shall be clearly\n35 labeled.\n36 Structural design standards and criteria used with reference to applicable industry standards and\n37 recommended practice codes. Include all calculations for tanks and anchoring. Tank shell shall be\n38 designed based on full tank. Design parameters used in calculations shall be clearly indicated and\n39 labeled on clarifying sketches. Seismic considerations that are appropriate to the seismic risk zone\n40 shall be accounted for in the calculations.\n41 Assessment of the compatibility of the leachate to be stored in the tank with the tank system\n42 materials. Show that the characteristics of the leachate to be stored are compatible with the material\n43 properties of the tank system, including material properties of the interior lining. Include the results\n44 of the chemical compatibility testing provided by the Engineer in this assessment.\nAppendix 4D.177\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Description and assessment of the secondary containment system, results of primary liner and\n2 secondary liner leak detection surveys, and collection of releases into the secondary containment\n3 system; compatibility of the materials in the secondary containment system with the leachate to be\n4 stored in the tank; strength of secondary containment system to withstand stresses from static head\n5 during a release, climatic conditions, nearby vehicle traffic, and daily operations; description of the\n6 leak detection system that will detect the failure of the primary containment structure or the presence\n7 of any release of leachate or accumulated liquid in the secondary containment system within 24\n8 hours; a description of the corrosion protection for the exterior surface of the tank.\n9 Assessment of ancillary equipment as shown on the Drawings (piping, fittings, flanges, valves, and\n10 pumps) associated with the tank including support and protection against damage and excessive stress\n11 due to excessive settlement, vibration, expansion, or contraction. Verify that peak flows and internal\n12 stresses are within the design limits specified by the manufacturer of the ancillary equipment.\n13 The recommended inspection schedule once the tank is placed in service based on the performance of\n14 similarly designed tank systems operating under similar conditions.\n15 A statement by the Registered Professional Engineer certifying that the tank system has been adequately\n16 designed and that the tank system has sufficient structural strength to ensure that it will not collapse,\n17 rupture, or fail under the design conditions. The certification shall include the following statement:\n18 \"I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my\n19 direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel\n20 properly gather and evaluate the information submitted Based on my inquiry of the person or\n21 persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information,\n22 the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief true, accurate, and complete. I\n23 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the\n24 possibility offine and imprisonment for knowing violations.\"\n25 The Registered Professional Engineer's signature and stamp must be placed below the certification\n26 statement.\n27 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n28 Vendor Information (VI):\n29 Installation: Tank Installation Instructions.\n30 O&M Manual:\n31 Tank Materials: Submit operating and maintenance instructions prior to completion of the Project. The\n32 manual shall include the manufacturer's cut sheets, parts lists, and a brief description of all equipment and\n33 their operating features. Maintenance instructions shall include all routine maintenance procedures,\n34 possible breakdowns and repairs, and troubleshooting guide, including recommended preventative\n35 maintenance tasks and frequencies for performance of those tasks.\n36 Information/Record (IR): Submit documentation of construction quality control as specified herein.\n37 Installation Inspection Report: A written report prepared by the Installation Inspector or the Registered\n38 Professional Engineer documenting the results of the tank system installation inspection. The installation\n39 inspection report shall contain the following:\n40 The as-built site plan showing the location of the installed tank system.\n41 An as-built drawing of the installed tank system including connected piping. Individual tanks shall be\n42 clearly labeled with ID numbers.\n43 Inspection notes, photographs, and any other material used to document inspection activities.\n44\nAppendix 4D.178\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 An assessment of the tank system for structural damage or inadequate construction/installation\n2 including weld breaks, punctures, damage to protective coatings, cracks, and corrosion, and\n3 documentation of any defects discovered in materials, equipment, or installation procedures and\n4 measurements taken to correct these defects.\n5 Documentation of tightness testing results demonstrating the tank system is tight prior to placing it in\n6 service.\n7 A statement certifying the proper installation of the tank system liner, signed by the liner installer's\n8 representative.\n9 A signed and dated statement by the Installation Inspector or Registered Professional Engineer certifying\n10 the proper installation of the tank system. The certification shall include the following statement:\n11 I certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my\n12 direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel\n13 properly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or\n14 persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information,\n15 the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I\n16 am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility\n17 of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.\n18 Leachate Compatibility Testinq\n19 The Engineer will conduct leachate compatibility testing on the tank liner and cover material samples\n20 submitted by the Construction General Contractor in accordance with EPA SW 846, Method 9090, or\n21 ASTM D5322 and D5747 procedures. At the completion of the testing, the Engineer will evaluate the\n22 testing data for conformance with the project requirements and approve or reject the material. The\n23 Engineer will provide the results of the evaluation and approval or rejection to the Construction General\n24 Contractor within 180 days after receipt of material samples. Construction General Contractor shall not\n25 order materials or proceed with fabrication until after receiving results and approval from the Engineer.\n26 Any product or material changes required as a result of inadequate leachate compatibility results will be\n27 addressed by Change Order, provided that the submitted material meets all other requirements of this\n28 section.\n29 Delivery and Storaqe\n30 All materials and equipment delivered and placed in storage shall be stored with protection from the\n31 weather, excessive humidity, and excessive temperature variation; and dirt, dust, or other contaminants.\n32 The tank components shall be shipped in crate(s) or pallet(s) designed to prevent physical damage to the\n33 tank coating, linings, and structural components.\n34 Warranty\n35 The tank shall have a 3-year warranty from the date of Substantial Completion covering workmanship,\n36 materials, all steel components, and the liners and floating cover system. The warranty shall provide for\n37 correction, or, at the option of the Tank Farm Contractor, removal and replacement of Work specified in\n38 this Specification section found defective during the period of the warranty.\n39 The Construction General Contractor shall provide the manufacturer's written warranty for the liners and\n40 cover. The warranty shall be provided to the Construction General Contractor as purchaser with the Tank\n41 Farm Contractor named as beneficiary and shall be signed by an authorized representative of the liner and\n42 cover manufacturer. The warranty shall guaranty the liner and cover material for the above-stated period\n43 against:\nAppendix 4D.179\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Manufacturing Defects\n2 Deterioration due to ozone, ultraviolet, and other exposure to the elements, including the stored\n3 leachate.\n4 Defects in material and factory seams.\n5 Defects resulting from installation.\n6 Part 2 -Products\n7 Manufacturer\n8 Dimensions are based on bolted steel tank as manufactured by Environetics, Inc. All dimensions and\n9 clearances shall be taken as minimum if an \"or equal\" tank manufacturer is submitted and approved by\n10 the Engineer. Construction General Contractor shall be responsible for all adjustments required to\n11 Drawings as a consequence of changing tank manufacturer.\n12 Standard Products\n13 Materials and equipment shall be the standard products of a manufacturer regularly engaged in the\n14 manufacture of such products and shall essentially duplicate items that have been in satisfactory use for at\n15 least 2 years prior to bid opening. Equipment shall be supported by a service organization that is, in the\n16 opinion of the Engineer, reasonably convenient to the site. The items specified under this section shall be\n17 furnished by constructors having experience and regular practice in the design, fabrication, and\n18 construction of steel tanks.\n19 Tank Size Requirements\n20 Number of Tanks Required: Two.\n21 Required Diameter: 101.46 feet.\n22 Required Height: 8.17 feet.\n23 Cover Required: Yes.\n24 Leachate Volume: 375,000 gallons.\n25 Top Capacity Level (TCL): 6.20 feet above tank floor.\n26 Design\n27 Design shall be in accordance with the requirements of AWWA D103.\n28 Design Loads:\n29 Specific Gravity: The tank shall be designed for liquids with a specific gravity of 1.00.\n30 Earthquake: The tank shall be designed for Seismic Zone 2B per UBC and AWWA D103, site\n31 amplification soil profile C, 1=1.0. For seismic, use leachate top capacity level (TCL).\n32 Wind Force: The tank shall be designed to the greater requirements of a 100-mph wind with pressure\n33 loads as calculated with AWWA D103 or an 85-mph with pressure loads determined using ASCE 7,\n34 1998. Wind force calculations shall include wind analysis with an empty tank case as well as a full tank\n35 case.\n36 Hydrostatic Pressure: Design tank for static pressure to top of tank shell height.\n37\nAppendix 4D. 180\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Leachate Characteristics for Leachate Compatibility Testing:\n2 Based on previous testing, the synthetic leachate for leachate compatibility testing of the tank liner\n3 material will have the following characteristics:\nChemical Compound Concentration (g/1)\nNaNO3 185.0\nNa2SO4 11.86\nNaF 1.46\nNa2CO3 3.45\nNaHCO 3 2.44\npH 9.2 ± 0.1, using NaOH or HNO3 as required\n4 Tank Components\n5 The tank and liner system shall consist of the following components: Corrugated steel wall panels with\n6 anchor embedded in concrete ringwall, geotextile base and wall buffer, secondary containment liner,\n7 drainage net, primary liner and floating cover, pipe connections, tank ladder, and piping for level and leak\n8 detection measurement.\n9 Corrugated Steel Wall Panels:\n10 The tank walls shall be constructed from individual rings of corrugated, hot-dip galvanized steel,\n11 mill-rolled to finished diameter. Sheet materials shall be ASTM A446, Grade D; or equal. Sheet\n12 materials shall be mill galvanized to ASTM A525, Class G90 standards, or equal. Shell plate\n13 thickness shall be based on AWWA D103 structural requirements. Wall plate thickness shall be a\n14 minimum of 12 gauge. Provide wind stiffeners as required by design.\n15 Sheet materials shall receive an electrostatically applied, thermally cured, polyester powder coat\n16 finish. The coating shall be applied in two coats with a minimum dry film thickness of 5.0 mils. The\n17 finished coating shall be white in color.\n18 Anchor Bolts: Shall conform to the requirements of AWWA D103.\n19 Bolted Joints: Structural bolts conform to the requirements of AWWA D103 and shall be zinc\n20 electroplated. Bolted joints shall utilize a minimum two vertical rows as required to withstand structural\n21 loads.\n22 Geotextile Base and Wall Buffer: An 8-ounce geotextile polypropylene nonwoven needle-punched\n23 fabric shall be placed on the tank floor and wall as a buffer for the liner. The fabric shall be designed to\n24 protect the liner from irregular surfaces on the tank wall. The material properties shall conform with the\n25 following:\nAppendix 4D.181\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nFabric Property Unit Test Method Value\nGrab Tensile Strength lb ASTM D4632 203\nGrab Elongation % ASTM D4632 50\nPuncture Strength lb ASTM D4833 130\nMullen Burst psi ASTM D3786 400\nTrapezoid Tear Strength lb ASTM D4533 80\nPermittivitya sec4 ASTM D4491 1.5\nWater Flow Ratea gpm/sq ft ASTM D4491 110\nAOS sieve ASTM D4751 100\nUV Resistance % strength @ 500 hrs ASTM D4355 70\n1 (a) Minimum average roll values (MARV) for these secondary physical properties shall not exceed\n2 specified values.\n3 Tank Secondary and Primary Liners and Floating Cover:\n4 The liners and floating cover shall be fabricated from polyester reinforced polymeric alloy. Sheet\n5 materials shall have UV resistance and weathering qualities and conform to the following properties:\nPhysical Property Physical Values Test Method\nThickness 30.0 mils min. ASTM D751\nWeight 30.0 ± 2 oz/yd2 ASTM D751\nTear Strength 35/35 lbf min. ASTM D4533,\nTrapezoid Tear\nBreaking Yield Strength 550/550 lbfmin. ASTM D751,\nGrab Tensile\nLow Temperature Pass @ -30oF ASTM D2136,\n4 hr -1/8\" mandrel\nDimensional Stability 1.5% max. ASTM D1204,\n212oF -I h\nreach direction\nAdhesion -Heat Sealed 35 lbd2 in min. ASTM D751,\nDielectric Weld\nSeam Dead Load -Seam Shear 2 in seam, 4 hr, ASTM D751\nStrength 1 in strip 210 lbf @ 70oF 105 lbf@ 160oF\nBursting Strength 650 lb min. ASTM D751\nBall Tip 800 lbf typical\nHydrostatic Resistance 800 psi min. ASTM D751\nMethod A\nBlocking Resistance # 2 Rating max. ASTM D751\n(1 80oF/820C)\nAppendix 4D.182\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nPhysical Property Physical Values Test Method\nAdhesion -Ply 15 lb/in min. ASTM D413\nor Film Tearing\nBond\nBonded Seam Strength 550 lbfmin. ASTM D751\nas modified by\nNSF 54\nAbrasion Resistance 2,000 cycles (min.) ASTM D3389\nbefore fabric exposure (H-18 Wheel, 1,000 g load)\n50 mg/100 cycles max\nweight loss\nWeathering Resistance 8,000 hrs (min.) - ASTM G23\n(Carbon-Arc)\nNo appreciable changes or\nstiffening or cracking of\ncoating\nWater Absorption 0.025 kg/m2 max. ASTM D471\nSection 12, @ 70oF/210C\n7 days, 0.14 kg/m2 max. @ 212oF/100oC\nWicking Shelter-Rite® 1/8 in max.\nProcedure\nPuncture Resistance 250 lbf min. ASTM D4833\nCoefficient of Thermal 8 x 10-6 in/in/oF max. ASTM D696\n1 EXPANSION/CONTRACTION\n2 Secondary and Primary Tank Liners: Shall be fabricated in a controlled factory environment into\n3 complete liners or large prefabricated panels. Size shall be limited to 3,000 pounds for ease of installation.\n4 Tank Liner Source Quality Control: The tank liner(s) and cover shall be fabricated from standard\n5 width sheeting into a full-size fitted liner by means of minimum 1-inch wide dielectric and 2-inch wide\n6 thermal welds. The liner(s) and cover shall be thoroughly inspected by the fabricator for flaws in\n7 materials or fabrication prior to shipment. Inspection shall be performed by 100 percent visual inspection\n8 and proprietary inflation-light test methods. Construction General Contractor shall provide\n9 documentation of factory inspections to the Construction Manager.\n10 Floating Cover: The cover shall be designed to comply with applicable AWWA D103 design standards.\n11 The cover shall incorporate closed cell polyethylene foam floatation elements in cover membrane pockets\n12 to provide the required buoyancy, drainage, and wind stability. The cover shall incorporate a center vent\n13 to evacuate air during fill cycle. The manufacturers shall provide a pump system with pump to remove\n14 excess surface water. Floating cover shall drain towards the perimeter of the tank where excess water\n15 may be collected and pumped out. Cover vent shall include a base plate to prevent tipping due to wind or\n16 snow load.\nAppendix 4D.183\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Drainage Net: The floor area of the tank shall be covered with fitted panels of high density polyethylene\n2 (HDPE) drainage net with a geotextile laminated to both sides of the drainage net to prevent clogging and\n3 to provide a cushion for the HDPE drainage net against the tank liners. The drainage net shall be installed\n4 between the primary and secondary liners to convey liquids between the liners to a leak detection sump.\n5 Properties for the drainage net and geotextile are as follows:\nPhysical Properties Test Method Physical Value\nCombined:\nTransmissivity, m/sec ASTM D4716 4 x 10-\nDrainage Net Component:\nTransmissivity, m/sec ASTM D4716 1 x 10-\nThickness, mill ASTM D1777 200\nDensity g/cm' ASTM D105 0.94\nTensile Strength, lb/in ASTM D5034/5035 45\nCarbon Black Content, % ASTM D1603 2.0\nGeotextile Component: 8 oz/yd2\nThickness, mill ASTM D5199 90\nGrab Tensile, lb ASTM D4632 210\nPuncture Strength, lb ASTM D4833 135 ± 5 lbs\nAOS, US Sieve ASTM D4751 80\nFlow Rate, gpm/ft ASTM D4491 110 ± 10 gpm/ft\nUV Resistance, % retained ASTM D4355 70\n6 Pipe Connections: Pipe fittings and connections shall be in accordance with manufacturer's\n7 requirements for double containment connections. Location of pipe connections shall be as shown on the\n8 Drawings.\n9 Tank Ladder: Provide a hot-dipped galvanized steel ladder for access to the floating cover pump. The\n10 ladder shall be attached at the top of the tank wall and at its base to the concrete ringwall. The ladder\n11 shall be of sufficient height to allow viewing of the floating cover system and its pump. The ladder shall\n12 be located adjacent to the tank level element installation.\n13 Tank Level and Leak Detection Measurement:\n14 Provide as part of tank construction two 2-inch diameter (Schedule 80 PVC) internal (stilling wells)\n15 that extend the whole interior operating height of tank, for the purpose of facilitating the installation\n16 of a submersible pressure transmitter (in one pipe), and a multipoint level sensor (in the other pipe).\n17 Level measurement instrumentation provided under Section 13401, PROCESS\n18 INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL SYSTEMS (PICS), and installed by Construction General\n19 Contractor under this section.\n20 Construction General Contractor shall furnish and install all necessary equipment and personnel to\n21 properly support installation of measurement devices (i.e., PVC flanges, straps, and gaskets).\n22\n23\nAppendix 4D. 184\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Foundation: Tank shell to bear on a Type I concrete ringwall per AWWA D103 as shown on the\n2 Drawings. A 1-1/2-inch minimum space between the tank bottom and the top of the ringwall shall be\n3 filled with a nonshrink grout as specified in Section 03301, CONCRETE. Cane fiber joint filler shall not\n4 be used. Ringwall design is shown on Drawings.\n5 Part 3 -Execution\n6 General\n7 Tank construction shall be in accordance with AWWA D103.\n8 Tank Installation\n9 Field erection of lined bolted steel tanks, including, but not limited to, shell plates, pipe connections,\n10 awning, primary and secondary containment, and floating cover, shall be in strict accordance with the\n11 manufacturer's recommendations including their guidance on environmental factors that could affect the\n12 tank installation.\n13 Construction Quality Control\n14 The Construction General Contractor shall establish and maintain a quality control system to assure\n15 compliance with contract requirements and shall maintain records of its quality control for all operations\n16 including, but not limited to the following:\n17 Inspection of materials delivered to project site against approved material data.\n18 Storage and handling of materials.\n19 Finished appearance.\n20 Completion of required testing.\n21 Copies in duplicate of these records and tests, as well as records of corrective action taken when results\n22 are unsatisfactory, shall be furnished to the Construction Manager within 24 hours following the\n23 inspection or test.\n24 Tank System Installation Inspection:\n25 The Construction General Contractor shall provide the services of an Installation Inspector or Registered\n26 Professional Engineer to provide full-time supervision of the installation of the storage tanks. No work\n27 shall be performed without the presence in the field of the Installation Inspector or Registered\n28 Professional Engineer. The Installation Inspector or Registered Professional Engineer shall observe and\n29 verify that correct materials and procedures are used for the following activities:\n30 Visual inspection and testing.\n31 Subgrade and foundation preparation.\n32 Placement and compaction of backfill.\n33 Placement of reinforcing steel and anchor bolts.\n34 Concrete placement.\n35 Placement of shop-fabricated tank parts.\n36 Erection of field-erected tank parts.\n37 Installation of tank liner systems. Tank liner inspection requirements are specified herein.\n38 Installation of piping, pumping, and other ancillary equipment.\n39 Tightness testing.\n40 Tank Liner Inspection:\n41 Visual Inspection: 100 percent visual inspection along all seams of the liners.\n42 Air Jet Inspection: 100 percent airjet inspection of all seams.\nAppendix 4D.185\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Any required repairs shall be corrected in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. Results\n2 of all testing shall be provided to the Construction Manager.\n3 Electronic Leak Location Survey: Prior to installing the floating cover, complete an electronic leak\n4 location survey of the secondary and primary liners.\n5 Floating Cover Drainage Test: Add water on floating cover to test that water drains towards the\n6 perimeter. Manufacturer to revise ballast if water does not drain to allow removal of excess water.\n7 Demonstrate proper operation of floating cover pump system to remove excess water.\n8 Tank Tightness Testing: Upon completion of tank installation, the tank shall be visually inspected for\n9 any signs of physical damage. Any questionable areas shall be repaired in accordance with the\n10 manufacturer's instructions. The tank shall be filled with water and let stand for a period of not less than\n11 2 days. The Construction General Contractor shall maintain a level not less than 7.2 feet for the duration\n12 of 2 days. Following the 2 days, the Construction General Contractor shall cyclically change the tank\n13 water level at a constant rate from 0.5 foot to 7.2 feet for four cycles over the next 28 days. During the\n14 30 days, there shall be no signs of leakage from a defect in the primary liner to the secondary containment\n15 system of the tank. Any leaks discovered by this test shall be corrected by the Construction General\n16 Contractor in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations. The tank system shall be\n17 successfully tested before it is accepted. Results of all testing shall be provided to the Construction\n18 Manager.\n19 END OF SECTION 13205\nAppendix 4D.186\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI SECTION 13401 -PROCESS INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL SYSTEMS (PICS)\n2 SCHED. B\n3 Part 1 -General\n4 UL And NRTL Compliance\n5 Materials manufactured within the scope of UL or another nationally recognized testing laboratory\n6 (NRTL) shall conform to UL or NRTL standards and have an applied UL or NRTL listing mark.\n7 References to UL throughout this section imply conformity with UL or NRTL standards and guidelines.\n8 PICS control panels shall be manufactured, assembled, tested, approved, and clearly labeled in\n9 accordance with UL 508A when required, prior to delivery to construction site.\n10 Approval by Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ): As specified in Section 16005, ELECTRICAL.\n11 Work Includes\n12 Engineering, furnishing, installing, calibrating, adjusting, testing, documenting, starting up, and Tank\n13 Farm Contractor training for a complete Process Instrumentation and Control System for plant.\n14 Detailed Design: PICS as shown and specified includes functional and performance requirements and\n15 component specifications. Complete detailed PICS design.\n16 Major Cell No. I and Cell No. 2 components and controls to integrate into PICS and to program include:\n17 Crest Pad Building Control Panel, PLC, and Operator Interface Assemblies.\n18 Crest Pad Building Sump, Combined Sump, Leachate Tank, and Leachate Transfer Building Transfer\n19 Pump Local Control Panel Assemblies.\n20 Leachate Collection and Removal, and Leak Detection System Pump Control.\n21 Leachate Collection and Removal, and Leak Detection System Pump Discharge Flow and Flow\n22 Totalization.\n23 Leachate Collection and Removal System Continuous Level Measurement.\n24 Leak Detection System Continuous Level Measurement.\n25 Leachate Storage Tank Continuous Level Measurement.\n26 Leachate Storage Tank, Crest Pad Building Sump, Carrier Pipe, and Combined Sump Leak Detection\n27 Chamber Discrete Level Measurement.\n28 Crest Pad Building Sump Discrete Level Measurement, and Pump Control.\n29 Combined Sump Discrete Level Measurement, and Pump Control.\n30 Interlock Control between Crest Pad Building Sump and Leachate Collection, and Removal and Leak\n31 Detection System Pump Controls.\n32 Crest Pad and Leachate Transfer Building Continuous Temperature Measurement.\n33 Leachate Transfer Pump Control and Flow Measurement, and Flow Totalization.\n34 Crest Pad Building Discrete Power Measurement.\n35 Definitions\n36 Abbreviations\n37 CAT: Construction Acceptance Test.\n38 CP: Control Panel.\n39 FDT: Factory Demonstration Test.\n40 LCP: Local Control Panel.\n41 MCC: Motor Control Center.\nAppendix 4D.187\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 OIU: Operator Interface Unit.\n2 PCT: PICS Continuity Test.\n3 PFT: PICS Functionality Test.\n4 PLC: Programmable Logic Controller.\n5 SLC: Small Programmable Logic Controller.\n6 Rising/Falling: Terms used to define actions of discrete devices about their set points.\n7 Rising: Contacts change state when an increasing process variable rises through set point.\n8 Failing: Contacts change state when a decreasing process variable falls through set point.\n9 Signal Types:\n10 Analog Signals, Current Type:\n11 4 to 20 mA dc signals conforming to ISA S50.1.\n12 Unless otherwise indicated for specific PICS Subsystem components, use the following ISA 50.1 options:\n13 Transmitter Type: Number 2, two-wire.\n14 Transmitter Load Resistance Capacity:\n15 Class L.\n16 Fully isolated transmitters and receivers.\n17 Analog Signals, Voltage Type:\n18 1 to 5 volts dc within control panels only.\n19 Discrete signals, two-state logic signals using dc or 120V ac sources as indicated.\n20 Special Signals: Other types of signals used to transmit analog and digital information between field\n21 elements, transmitters, receivers, controllers, and digital devices.\n22 Instrument Tag Numbers: In accordance with DOE-RL Standards.\n23 Submittals-Approval Required\n24 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n25 Shop Drawings:\n26 General:\n27 Shop Drawings, full-scaled details, wiring diagrams, catalog cuts, and descriptive literature.\n28 Identify proposed items and options. Identify installed spares and other provisions for future work\n29 (e.g., reserved panel space; unused components, wiring, and terminals).\n30 Bill of Materials: List of required equipment.\n31 Group equipment items as follows:\n32 I&C Components: By component identification code.\n33 Other Equipment: By equipment type.\n34 Data Included:\n35 Equipment tag number.\n36 Description.\n37 Manufacturer, complete model number, and all options not defined by model number.\nAppendix 4D.188\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Quantity supplied.\n2 Component identification code where applicable.\n3 Catalog Cuts: I&C Components, Electrical Devices, and Mechanical Devices:\n4 Catalog information, mark to identify proposed items and options.\n5 Descriptive literature.\n6 External power and signal connections.\n7 Scaled drawings showing exterior dimensions and locations of electrical and mechanical interfaces.\n8 Component Data Sheets: Data sheets for I&C components.\n9 Format and Level of Detail:\n10 In accordance with ISA-S20.\n11 Include component type identification code and tag number on data sheet.\n12 Specific features and configuration data for each component:\n13 Location or service.\n14 Manufacturer and complete model number.\n15 Size and scale range.\n16 Set points.\n17 Materials of construction.\n18 Options included.\n19 Name, address, and telephone number of manufacturer's local office, representative, distributor, or\n20 service facility.\n21 Panel Construction Drawings:\n22 Scale Drawings: Show dimensions and location of panel mounted devices, doors, louvers, and\n23 subpanels, internal and external.\n24 Panel Legend: List front of panel devices by tag numbers, nameplate inscriptions, service legends, and\n25 annunciator inscriptions.\n26 Bill of Materials: List devices mounted within panel that are not listed in panel legend. Include tag\n27 number, description, manufacturer, and model number.\n28 Construction Details: NEMA rating, materials, material thickness, structural stiffeners and brackets,\n29 lifting lugs, mounting brackets and tabs, door hinges and latches, and welding and other connection\n30 callouts and details.\n31 Construction Notes: Finishes, wire color schemes, wire ratings, wire and terminal block, numbering and\n32 labeling scheme.\n33 Panel Control Diagrams: For discrete control and power circuits.\n34 Diagram Type: Ladder diagrams. Include devices, related to discrete functions that are mounted in or\n35 on the panel and that require electrical connections. Show unique rung numbers on left side of each rung.\n36 Item Identification: Identify each item with attributes listed.\n37 Wires: Wire number and color. Cable number if part of multiconductor cable.\n38 Terminals: Location (enclosure number, terminal junction box number, or MCC number), terminal strip\n39 number, and terminal block number.\n40 Discrete Components:\nAppendix 4D.189\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Tag number, terminal numbers, and location (\"FIELD\", enclosure number, or MCC number).\n2 Switching action (open or close on rising or falling process variable), set point value and units, and\n3 process variable description (e.g., Sump Level High).\n4 Relay Coils:\n5 Tag number and its function.\n6 On right side of run where coil is located, list contact location by ladder number and sheet number.\n7 Underline normally closed contacts.\n8 Relay Contacts:\n9 Coil tag number, function, and coil location (ladder rung number and sheet number).\n10 Show each circuit individually. No \"typical\" diagrams or \"typical\" wire lists will be permitted.\n11 Ground wires, surge protectors, and connections.\n12 Panel Wiring Diagrams: Show point-to-point and terminal-to-terminal wiring within panel.\n13 Loop Diagrams:\n14 Individual wiring diagram for each analog or pulse frequency loop.\n15 Conform to the ISA S5.4 Standards.\n16 Drawing Size:\n17 Individual 11-inch by 17-inch sheet for each loop.\n18 Divide each loop diagram into areas for panel face, back-of-panel, and field.\n19 Show:\n20 Terminal numbers, location of dc power supply, and location of common dropping resistors.\n21 Switching contacts in analog loops and output contacts of analog devices. Reference specific control\n22 diagrams where functions of these contacts are shown.\n23 Tabular summary on each diagram.\n24 Transmitting Instruments: Output capability.\n25 Receiving Instruments: Input impedance.\n26 Loop Wiring Impedance:\n27 Estimate based on wire sizes and lengths shown.\n28 Total loop impedance.\n29 Reserve output capacity.\n30 Conduit and cable schedule names.\n31 Interconnecting Wiring Diagrams:\n32 Diagrams, device designations, and symbols in accordance with NEMA ICS 1.\n33 Diagrams shall bear electrical Construction Subcontractor's signature attesting diagrams have been\n34 coordinated with Division 16, ELECTRICAL.\n35 Show:\n36 Electrical connections between equipment, consoles, panels, terminal junction boxes, and field\n37 mounted components.\n38 Component and panel terminal board identification numbers, and external wire and cable numbers.\n39 Circuit names matching Conduit and Cable Schedule.\nAppendix 4D.190\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Intermediate terminations between field elements and panels for, e.g., to terminal junction boxes and\n2 pull boxes.\n3 Pull boxes.\n4 Factory Demonstration Test (FDT): Provide FDT documentation for control panels.\n5 Installation Details:\n6 Include modifications or further details required to adequately define installation of I&C components.\n7 List of spares, expendables, test equipment and tools.\n8 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n9 Information/Record (IR): For PICS equipment, provide Manufacturer's Certificate of Proper\n10 Installation and readiness for operation.\n11 Tank Farm Contractor Training Plan: In accordance with Article TRAINING.\n12 Construction Quality Control Test Data: Provide documentation of PICS Continuity Test (PCT) and\n13 PICS Functionality Test (PFT).\n14 Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Manuals:\n15 Content and Format:\n16 Complete sets O&M manuals, including recommended preventative maintenance tasks and\n17 frequencies for performance of those tasks.\n18 Sufficient detail to allow operation, removal, installation, adjustment, calibration, maintenance and\n19 purchasing replacements for each PICS component.\n20 Final versions of Legend and Abbreviation Lists.\n21 Include:\n22 Process and Instrumentation Diagrams: One reproducible copy of revised P&ID to reflect as-built\n23 PICS design.\n24 Refer to paragraph Shop Drawings for the following items:\n25 Bill of Materials.\n26 Catalog Cuts.\n27 Component Data Sheets.\n28 Panel Control Diagrams.\n29 Panel Wiring Diagrams, one reproducible copy.\n30 Loop Diagrams, one reproducible copy.\n31 Interconnecting Wiring Diagrams, one reproducible copy.\n32 Device O&M manuals for components, electrical devices, and mechanical devices include:\n33 Operations procedures.\n34 Installation requirements and procedures.\n35 Maintenance requirements and procedures including recommended preventative maintenance tasks\n36 and frequencies for performance of those tasks.\n37 Troubleshooting procedures.\n38 Calibration procedures.\n39 Internal schematic and wiring diagrams.\n40 Component Calibration Sheets from field quality control calibrations.\n41 List of spares, expendables, test equipment and tools provided.\nAppendix 4D.191\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 List of additional spares, expendables, test equipment and tools recommended.\n2 Factory Demonstration Test (FDT), PICS Continuity Test (PCT), and PICS Functionality Test\n3 (PFT) Submittals:\n4 Preliminary Test Procedures: Outlines of proposed tests, forms, and checklists.\n5 Final Test Procedures: Proposed test procedures, forms, and checklists.\n6 Test Documentation: Copy of signed off test procedures when tests are completed.\n7 Application Software Submittal and Design Workshops:\n8 Location: There shall be a minimum of six (6) workshops held at the Tank Farm Contractor's facility (or\n9 by video and audio conferencing) during the course of the project.\n10 Objective: To provide a vehicle by which the Tank Farm Contractor is able review and comment on\n11 PLC, OIU, communication hardware, standard software, and application software submittals and\n12 application software development.\n13 Documentation: Application software supplier shall summarize resolutions reached in each workshop,\n14 including cost and schedule impacts and distribute copies to Tank Farm Contractor.\n15 Order and minimum topics to be covered in each workshop:\n16 Applications Software Design Workshop (kick off) that establishes project processes, including:\n17 Workshop objectives.\n18 Submittal process.\n19 Review Work Sequence and schedule.\n20 Loop Specifications, P&ID Review Workshop:\n21 Application Software Supplier use P&IDs and Specifications to present how the proposed control system\n22 design and Applications Software will meet the functional requirements specified herein.\n23 At the completion of workshop Applications Software Supplier modifies as necessary Loop\n24 Specifications.\n25 Submit finalized Loop Specification along with an outline of any application software cost and schedule\n26 impacts.\n27 PLC Software Standards Submittal Workshop: PLC Software Standards shall be developed in a\n28 Software Standards Workshop. Ladder diagram standards for commonly used functions, including the\n29 following:\n30 Objective: To develop, implement, and review implementation of PLC Software Standards in ladder\n31 logic programming.\n32 Ladder diagram standards for commonly used functions, including the following:\n33 High and low process variable alarm checking.\n34 Instrument failure alarm detection.\n35 Equipment start/stop control.\n36 Equipment failure detection.\n37 Equipment run time.\n38 Leak detection and equipment interlocks.\n39 Signal filtering.\n40 Flow totalization.\n41 Alarm routines.\nAppendix 4D.192\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Interface with OIU.\n2 Memory mapping, data transfer (read/write, remote set point adjustment, pump control and alarm\n3 management).\n4 Submit for review ladder logic programming for each PLC including: descriptive ladder logic, cross\n5 references, memory map and point databases.\n6 OIU Standard Workshop:\n7 Objective: To develop, implement, and review implementation of OIU standards with Tank Farm\n8 Contractor.\n9 Design Products and Topics to be Finalized:\n10 OIU and PLC integration.\n11 OIU tag naming conventions.\n12 Process, set point, and runtime graphics.\n13 Display paging and navigation.\n14 Dynamic Objects:\n15 Pumps, valves, gates, compressors, etc.\n16 Equipment control through pop-up windows.\n17 General data entry through the OIU.\n18 Dynamic Objects:\n19 Pumps, valves, gates, process indicators, indicators with alarms, data entry, controller face plate, and\n20 tanks.\n21 Security.\n22.. Alarm Management.\n23 Minimum OIU Design Products and Topics to be Finalized for Each OIU:\n24 Eight (8) Process Graphics.\n25 Eight (8) Pop-Up Equipment Operation Control Graphics.\n26 One (1) Alarm Summary Process Control Graphic.\n27 One (1) Alarm History Process Control Graphic.\n28 One (1) Equipment Runtime Process Control Graphic.\n29 One (1) Analog Process Summary Control Graphic.\n30 Submit for review OIU programming and development for each OIU computer including: memory\n31 mapping, database structures, graphic displays, and alarms.\n32 Delivery, Storage, and Handlinq\n33 Provide site and warehouse storage facilities for PICS equipment.\n34 Prior to shipment, include corrosive-inhibitive vapor capsules in shipping containers, and related\n35 equipment as recommended by the capsule manufacturer.\n36 Prior to installation, store items in dry indoor locations. Provide heating in storage areas for items\n37 subject to corrosion under damp conditions.\n38 Cover panels and other elements that are exposed to dusty construction environments.\n39 Electrical equipment (valves, instruments, sensors, enclosures) shall be wired complete and in\n40 accordance with the manufacturer's wiring diagrams and instructions.\n41 Completed wiring diagrams shall be incorporated in the O&M submittal.\nAppendix 4D. 193\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Environmental Requirements\n2 Standard Environmental Requirements: Unless otherwise noted, provide equipment for continuous\n3 operation in these environments:\n4 Freestanding Panel and Consoles:\n5 Inside: NEMA 12.\n6 Smaller Panels and Assemblies (that are not Freestanding):\n7 Inside: NEMA 4X.\n8 All Other Locations: NEMA 4X.\n9 Field Elements: Outside.\n10 Special Environmental Requirements:\n11 Design panels for continuous operation in environments listed:\n12 Building Sump Local Control Panel to be installed inside Cell No. I and Cell No. 2 Crest Pad Buildings.\n13 Transfer Pump Local Control Panel to be installed inside Cell No. I and Cell No. 2 Leachate Transfer\n14 Buildings.\n15 Leachate Storage Tank Local Control Panel to be installed outdoors adjacent to Cell No. 1 and Cell No. 2\n16 Leachate Storage Tanks.\n17 Combined Sump Local Control Panel to be installed inside Cell No. I and Cell No. 2 Crest Pad Buildings.\n18 Control Panel to be installed inside Cell No. 1 and Cell No. 2 Crest Pad Buildings.\n19 Environmental Design Requirements: Environmental conditions are defined below:\n20 Inside:\n21 Temperature: 10 to 30 degrees C.\n22 Relative Humidity: 15 to 90 percent noncondensing.\n23 NEC Classification: Nonhazardous.\n24 Outside:\n25 Temperature: Minus 40 to 40 degrees C.\n26 Relative Humidity: 15 to 90 percent noncondensing.\n27 NEC Classification: Nonhazardous (except for interior of Combined Sump Assemblies).\n28 Snow Accumulation: 5 inches.\n29 Sequencing and Scheduling:\n30 Activity Completion: The following is a list of key activities and their completion criteria:\n31 Shop Drawings: Reviewed and approved.\n32 Factory Demonstration Testing of Control Panels: Reviewed and accepted.\n33 Hardware Delivery: Hardware delivered to site and inventoried by Tank Farm Contractor.\n34 PCT: Completed and required test documentation accepted.\n35 PFT: Completed and required test documentation accepted.\nAppendix 4D.194\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 PICS Substantial Completion: When Construction Manager issues Certificate of Substantial\n2 Completion.\n3 Prerequisites:\n4 All PICS Submittals have been completed.\n5 PICS has successfully completed FDT and PFT.\n6 Tank Farm Contractor training plan is on schedule.\n7 All spares, expendables, and test equipment have been delivered to Tank Farm Contractor.\n8 PICS Acceptance: When Construction Manager issues a written notice of Final Payment and\n9 Acceptance.\n10 Prerequisites:\n11 Certificate of Substantial Completion issued for PICS.\n12 Punch-list items completed.\n13 Final revisions to O&M manuals accepted.\n14 Maintenance service agreements for PICS accepted by which shall satisfy the following requirements:\n15 Duration of 2 years unless negotiated with Tank Farm Contractor.\n16 Start on date of PICS acceptance, as identified in Section 13401, PICS, Article SEQUENCING AND\n17 SCHEDULING, Paragraph PICS Acceptance.\n18 Performed by factory trained service engineers with experience on PICS systems to be maintained.\n19 All materials and labor for preventive maintenance and visit site bimonthly.\n20 All materials and labor for demand maintenance with coverage 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday\n21 through Friday.\n22 Response Time: Service engineer shall be onsite within 24 hours of request by Tank Farm Contractor.\n23 Spare Parts:\n24 If not stocked onsite, delivered to Site within 24 hours from time of request.\n25 Repair or replace all components or software found to be faulty.\n26 Replace and restock within 1 month, onsite spare parts and expendables used for maintenance.\n27 Provide list of items used and replaced.\n28 Submit records of inspection, maintenance, calibration, repair, and replacement within 2 weeks after\n29 each visit to site.\n30 Telephone Support: Coverage 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.\n31 Software Subscription: 2-year support per Section 13401, PICS, Supplements.\nAppendix 4D.195\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Prerequisite Activities and Lead Times: Do not start the following key Project activities until the\n2 prerequisite activities and lead times listed below have been completed and satisfied:\nActivity Prerequisites and Lead Times\nSubmittal reviews by Engineer and Tank Tank Farm Contractor acceptance of Submittal breakdown\nFarm Contractor and schedule.\nHardware purchasing, fabrication, and Associated shop drawing Submittals completed\nassembly.\nShipment Completion of PICS Shop Drawing and Quality Control\nSubmittals, preliminary O&M manuals, and Factory\nDemonstration Testing.\nPCT PCT procedures completed; notice 3 weeks prior to start.\nTank Farm Tank Farm Contractor training plan completed.\nContractor Training\nPFT Startup, Tank Farm Contractor training, and PFT\nprocedures completed; notice 4 weeks prior to start.\n3 Part 2 -Products\n4 General\n5 The general functions of the PICS are as depicted on the Drawings. The PICS Contractor shall provide a\n6 full-featured system that is complete, calibrated, and fully operational.\n7 Like Equipment Items: Use products of one manufacturer and of the same series or family of models to\n8 achieve standardization for appearance, operation, maintenance, spare parts, and manufacturer's services.\n9 Implement all same or similar functions in same or similar manner. For example, control logic, sequence\n10 controls, and display layouts.\n11 Loop Specifications\n12 Location: Article SUPPLEMENTS.\n13 Organization: By unit process and loop number.\n14 Functional Requirements for Control Loops: Shown on Drawings, in Panel Control Diagrams, and\n15 Process and Instrumentation Diagrams (P&ID). P&ID format and symbols are in accordance with\n16 ISA S5.1, except as specified or shown on Drawings.\n17 Supplemented by Loop Specifications.\n18 Subheadings for Each Loop:\n19 Functions: Clarifies functional performance of loop, including abstract of interlocks.\n20 Components: Lists major components for each loop. Information listed include: Tag numbers.\n21 Component Identification Codes: Alphanumeric codes of required components. Refer to Component\n22 Specification referenced in Article SUPPLEMENTS.\n23 Component Names and Options: Required to tailor general Component Specifications to specific\n24 application. For example, special materials, mounting, size, unit range, scale, set points, and controller\n25 options.\nAppendix 4D.196\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 I&C Components\n2 Components for Each Loop: Major components for each loop are listed in Instrument List referenced in\n3 Article SUPPLEMENTS. Furnish all equipment that is necessary to achieve required loop performance.\n4 Component Specifications: Generalized specifications for each type of component are located in Article\n5 SUPPLEMENTS.\n6 Nameplates And Tags\n7 Panel Nameplates: Enclosure identification located on the enclosure face.\n8 Location and Inscription: As shown.\n9 Materials: Laminated plastic attached to panel with stainless steel screws.\n10 Letters: 1/2-inch white on black background, unless otherwise noted.\n11 Component Nameplates-Panel Face: Component identification located on panel face under or near\n12 component.\n13 Location and Inscription: As shown.\n14 Materials: Laminated plastic attached to panel with stainless steel screws.\n15 Letters: 3/16-inch white on black background, unless otherwise noted.\n16 Component Nameplates-Back of Panel: Component identification located near component inside of\n17 enclosure.\n18 Inscription: Component tag number.\n19 Materials: Adhesive backed, laminated plastic.\n20 Letters: 3/16-inch white on black background, unless otherwise noted.\n21 Legend Plates for Panel Mounted Pushbuttons, Lights, and Switches:\n22 Inscription: Refer to:\n23 Table under paragraph Standard Pushbutton Colors and Inscriptions.\n24 Table under paragraph Standard Light Colors and Inscriptions.\n25 P&IDs in Drawings.\n26 Materials: Engraved plastic, keyed legend plates. Secured to panel by mounting nut for pushbutton,\n27 light, or switch.\n28 Letters: Black on gray or white background.\n29 Service Legends: Component identification nameplate located on face of component.\n30 Inscription: As shown.\n31 Materials: Adhesive backed, laminated plastic.\n32 Letters: 3/16-inch white on black background, unless otherwise noted.\n33 Nametags: Component identification for field devices.\n34 Inscription: Component tag number.\n35 Materials: 16-gauge, Type 304 stainless steel.\n36 Letters: 3/16-inch imposed.\n37 Mounting: Affix to component with 16- or 18-gauge stainless steel wire or stainless steel screws.\nAppendix 4D.197\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Electrical Requirements\n2 In accordance with Division 16, ELECTRICAL.\n3 I&C and electrical components, terminals, wires, and enclosures: UL recognized or UL listed.\n4 Wires Within Enclosures:\n5 ac Circuits:\n6 Type: 600-volt, Type SIS stranded copper.\n7 Size: For current to be carried, but not less than No. 14 AWG.\n8 Analog Signal Circuits:\n9 Type: 600-volt stranded copper, twisted shielded pairs.\n10 Size: No. 16 AWG, minimum.\n11 Other dc Circuits:\n12 Type: 600-volt, Type SIS stranded copper.\n13 Size: For current carried, but not less than No. 18 AWG.\n14 Special Signal Circuits: Use manufacturer's standard cables.\n15 Wire Identification: Numbered and tagged at each termination.\n16 Wire Tags:\n17 Snap-on or slip-on PVC wire markers with legible machine printed markings and numbers. Adhesive\n18 or taped-on tags are not acceptable.\n19 Wires entering or leaving enclosures, terminate and identify as follows:\n20 Analog and discrete signal, terminate at numbered terminal blocks.\n21 Special signals, terminated using manufacturer's standard connectors.\n22 Identify wiring in accordance with Division 16, ELECTRICAL.\n23 Terminal Blocks for Enclosures:\n24 Wire spare PLC I/O points to terminal blocks.\n25 One wire per terminal for field wires entering enclosures.\n26 Maximum of two wires per terminal for 18-WG wire for internal enclosure wiring.\n27 Spare Terminals: 20 percent of all connected terminals, but not less than 5 per terminal block.\n28 General:\n29 Connection Type: Screw compression clamp.\n30 Compression Clamp:\n31 Complies with DIN-VDE 0611.\n32 Hardened steel clamp with transversal groves that penetrate wire strands providing a vibration-proof\n33 connection.\n34 Guides strands of wire into terminal.\n35 Screws: Hardened steel, captive and self-locking.\n36 Current Bar: Copper or treated brass.\nAppendix 4D.198\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Insulation:\n2 Thermoplastic rated for minus 55 to plus 110 degree C.\n3 Two funneled shaped inputs to facilitate wire entry.\n4 Mounting:\n5 Standard DIN rail.\n6 Terminal block can be extracted from an assembly without displacing adjacent blocks.\n7 End Stops: Minimum of one at each end of rail.\n8 Wire Preparation: Stripping only permitted.\n9 Jumpers: Allow jumper installation without loss of space on terminal or rail.\n10 Marking System:\n11 Terminal number shown on both sides of terminal block.\n12 Allow use of preprinted and field marked tags.\n13 Terminal strip numbers shown on end stops.\n14 Mark terminal block and terminal strip numbers as shown on Panel Control Diagrams and Loop\n15 Diagrams.\n16 Terminal Block, General-Purpose:\n17 Rated Voltage: 600V ac.\n18 Rated Current: 30 amp.\n19 Wire Size: No. 22 to No. 10 AWG.\n20 Rated Wire Size: No. 10 AWG.\n21 Color: Grey body.\n22 Spacing: 0.25 inch, maximum.\n23 Test Sockets: One screw test socket 0.079-inch diameter.\n24 Manufacturer and Product: Entrelec; Type M4/6.T.\n25 Terminal Block, Ground:\n26 Wire Size: No. 22 to No. 12 AWG.\n27 Rated Wire Size: No. 12 AWG.\n28 Color: Green and yellow body.\n29 Spacing: 0.25 inch, maximum.\n30 Grounding: Ground terminal blocks electrically grounded to the mounting rail.\n31 Manufacturer and Product: Entrelec; Type M4/6.P.\n32 Terminal Block, Blade Disconnect Switch:\n33 Rated Voltage: 600V ac.\n34 Rated Current: 10-amp.\n35 Wire Size: No. 22 to No. 12 AWG.\n36 Rated Wire Size: No. 12 AWG.\nAppendix 4D.199\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Color: Grey body, orange switch.\n2 Spacing: 0.25 inch, maximum.\n3 Manufacturer and Product: Entrelec; Type M4/6.SN.T.\n4 Terminal Block, Fused, 24V dc:\n5 Rated Voltage: 600V dc.\n6 Rated Current: 16-amp.\n7 Wire Size: No. 22 to No. 10 AWG.\n8 Rated Wire Size: No. 10 AWG.\n9 Color: Grey body.\n10 Fuse: 0.25 inch by 1.25 inches.\n11 Indication: LED diode 24V dc.\n12 Spacing: 0.512 inch, maximum.\n13 Manufacturer and Product: Entrelec; Type M1O/13T.SFL.\n14 Terminal Block, Fused, 120V ac:\n15 Rated Voltage: 600V ac.\n16 Rated Current: 16-amp.\n17 Wire Size: No. 22 to No. 10 AWG.\n18 Rated Wire Size: No. 10 AWG.\n19 Color: Grey body.\n20 Fuse: 0.25 inch by 1.25 inches.\n21 Indication: Neon Lamp 1 1OV ac.\n22 Leakage Current: 1.8 mA, maximum.\n23 Spacing: 0.512 inch, maximum.\n24 Manufacturer and Product: Entrelec; Type M10/13T.SFL.\n25 Terminal Block, Fused, 120V ac, High Current:\n26 Rated Voltage: 600V ac.\n27 Rated Current: 35 amps.\n28 Wire Size: No. 18 to No. 8 AWG.\n29 Rated Wire Size: No. 8 AWG.\n30 Color: Grey.\n31 Fuse: 13/32 inch by 1.5 inches.\n32 Spacing: 0.95 inch, maximum.\n33 Manufacturer and Product: Entrelec; Type MB10/24.SF.\n34 Grounding of Enclosures: Furnish copper isolated ground bus. Take car to ensure that this bus is\n35 connected to the safety ground bus at only one point.\nAppendix 4D.200\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Single Point Ground for Each Analog Loop:\n2 Group and connect shields in following locations:\n3 Control Panel.\n4 Ground terminal block rails to ground bus.\n5 Analog Signal Isolators: Furnish signal isolation for analog signals that are sent from one enclosure to\n6 another and where required to provide proper function. Do not wire in series instruments on different\n7 panels, cabinets, or enclosures.\n8 Power Distribution Within Panels:\n9 Feeder Circuits:\n10 One or more 120V ac, 60-Hz feeder circuits as shown on Drawings.\n11 Make provisions for feeder circuit conduit entry.\n12 Furnish terminal blocks for termination of wires.\n13 Power Panel:\n14 Furnish main circuit breaker and a circuit breaker on each individual branch circuit distributed from\n15 power panel.\n16 Locate to provide clear view of and access to breakers when door is open.\n17 Breaker Sizes: Coordinate such that fault in branch circuit will blow only branch breaker but not trip the\n18 main breaker.\n19 Branch Circuit Breaker: Select size of circuit breaker to suit load at 250V ac.\n20 Breaker Manufacturers and Products: Allen-Bradley 1492-GH.\n21 Circuit Wiring: P&IDs and Control Diagrams on Drawings show function only. Use following rules for\n22 actual circuit wiring:\n23 Devices on Single Circuit: 20, maximum.\n24 Multiple Units Performing Parallel Operations: To prevent failure of any single branch circuit from\n25 shutting down entire operation, do not group all units on same branch circuit.\n26 Branch Circuit Loading: 12 amperes continuous, maximum.\n27 Panel Lighting and Service Outlets:\n28 Put on separate 15-amp, 120V ac branch circuit.\n29 Provide 120-volt ac plugmold for panel components with line cords.\n30 Signal Distribution:\n31 Within Panels: 4 to 20 mA dc signals may be distributed as I to 5V dc.\n32 Outside Panels:\n33 Isolated 4 to 20 mA dc only.\n34 All signal wiring in twisted shielded pairs.\n35 Between Panels: 4 to 20 mA dc signals isolated by current signal isolators.\n36 Signal Switching:\n37 Use dry circuit type relays or switches.\n38 No interruption of 4 to 20 mA loops during switching.\n39 Switching Transients in Associated Signal Circuit:\nAppendix 4D.201\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 4 to 20 mA dc Signals: 0.2 mA, maximum.\n2 1 to 5V dc Signals: 0.05V, maximum.\n3 Current Signal Isolators: Solid state three- and four-way isolation of the input signal, two output\n4 signals, and external power supply.\n5 Features:\n6 Zero and span trim adjustments using 15-turn potentiometers.\n7 Calibration independent of load.\n8 Signal Interface:\n9 Input: 4 to 20 mA dc maximum impedance: 75 ohms.\n10 Output: Two 4 to 20 mA dc. Capable of drives output load impedance up to 1,050 ohms independent of\n11 supply voltage to isolator.\n12 Enclosure: NEMA 1, unless otherwise noted.\n13 Mounting: DIN rail, unless otherwise noted.\n14 Power: 115V ac, unless otherwise noted.\n15 Manufacturer: Moore ECT Isolators; or approved equal.\n16 Intrinsic Safety: Programmable three-channel switching amplifier with intrinsically safe input circuits,\n17 used to isolate and transfer discrete signals from Class 1, Class II, or Class III hazardous location to a\n18 nonhazardous location.\n19 Inputs: Three-channel dry contact inputs to switching amplifier.\n20 Outputs: Three-channel SPDT dry relay contact outputs, each selectable to be (N.O.) or (N.C.) Output\n21 function dependent upon input condition.\n22 Indications: Two-color switching status LED for each channel. \"Yellow\" LED when output relay is\n23 energized. \"Green\" LED with power ON status, \"Red\" LED for Fault Condition.\n24 Supply Voltage: 10-30 VDC.\n25 Power Consumption: >2 watts.\n26 Output contact Ratings: 500 VA/60W.\n27 Approvals and Certifications: FM approved, and CSA Certified.\n28 Manufacturer and Product: TURK MD13-231ExO-R/24VDC or equal.\n29 Relays:\n30 General:\n31 Relay Mounting: Plug-in type socket.\n32 Relay Enclosure: Furnish dust cover.\n33 Socket Type: Screw terminal interface with wiring.\n34 Socket Mounting:\n35 Rail.\n36 Provide hold-down clips.\n37 Control Circuit Switching Relay, Nonlatching:\n38 Type: Compact general-purpose plug-in.\nAppendix 4D.202\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Contact Arrangement: 3 Form C contacts.\n2 Contact Rating: IA at 28V dc or 240V ac.\n3 Contact Material: Silver cadmium oxide alloy.\n4 Coil Voltage: As noted or shown.\n5 Coil Power: 1.2 watts (dc), 1.75VA (ac).\n6 Expected Mechanical Life: 10,000,000 operations.\n7 Expected Electrical Life at Rated Load: 100,000 operations.\n8 Indication Type: Neon or LED indicator lamp.\n9 Push to test button.\n10 Manufacturer and Product: Allen-Bradley; 700-HA Series.\n11 For all 11-pin relays use Allen-Bradley 700-HN203. For 8-pin relays, use Allen-Bradley 700-HN203.\n12 Control Circuit Switching Relay, Latching:\n13 Type: Dual coil mechanical latching relay.\n14 Contact Arrangement: 2 Form C contacts.\n15 Contact Rating: IOA at 28V dc or 120V ac.\n16 Contact Material: Silver cadmium oxide alloy.\n17 Coil Voltage: As noted or shown.\n18 Coil Power: 2.7 watts (dc), 5.3VA (ac).\n19 Expected Mechanical Life: 500,000 operations.\n20 Expected Electrical Life at Rated Load: 50,000 operations.\n21 Manufacturer and Product: Potter and Brumfield; Series KB/KBP.\n22 Control Circuit Switching Relay, Time Delay:\n23 Type: Adjustable time delay relay.\n24 Contact Arrangement: 3 Form C contacts.\n25 Contact Rating: IOA at 240V ac.\n26 Contact Material: Silver cadmium oxide alloy.\n27 Coil Voltage: As noted or shown.\n28 Operating Temperature: Minus 10 to 55 degrees C.\n29 Repeatability: Plus or minus 0.5 percent.\n30 Timing Module: Solid state multifunction plug-in module. Plugs into socket to add timing feature to\n31 general purpose relay.\n32 Manufacturer and Products: Allen-Bradley 700-HT1 for ac, 700-HT2 for dc.\n33 Power Supplies:\n34 Furnish to power instruments requiring external dc power, including two-wire transmitters and dc\n35 relays.\nAppendix 4D.203\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Convert 120V ac, 60-Hz power to dc power of appropriate voltage(s) with plus or minus 0.05 percent\n2 voltage regulation and ripple control to assure that instruments being supplied can operate within their\n3 required tolerances.\n4 Provide output over voltage and over current protective devices to:\n5 Protect instruments from damage due to power supply failure.\n6 Protect power supply from damage due to external failure.\n7 Enclosures:\n8 NEMA I in accordance with NEMA 250.\n9 Mount such that dissipated heat does not adversely affect other components.\n10 Fuses: For each dc supply line to each individual two-wire transmitter.\n11 Type: Indicating.\n12 Mount so fuses can be easily seen and replaced.\n13 Resistors: All resistors used to derive a 1-5V dc signal from a 4-20 mA dc signal shall be 250 ohm,\n14 ±1 percent, 3 watts, axial lead, non-inductive wire wound, welded construction, silicone coated,\n15 1,000V ac dielectric. Vishay-Dale RS-2B-NS or equal. 250 ohms is a standard value in this line, and use\n16 of a resistance other that 250 ohms is not acceptable.\n17 Internal Panel Lights for Freestanding Panels:\n18 Type: Switched 100-watt fluorescent back-of-panel lights.\n19 Quantity: One light for every 4 feet of panel width.\n20 Mounting:\n21 Inside and in the top of back-of-panel area.\n22 Protective metal shield for lights.\n23 Service Outlets for Freestanding Panels:\n24 Type: Three-wire, 120-volt, 15-ampere, GFI duplex receptacles.\n25 Quantity:\n26 For Panels 4 Feet Wide and Smaller: One.\n27 For Panels Wider Than 4 Feet: One for every 4 feet of panel width, two minimum per panel.\n28 Mounting: Evenly spaced along back-of-panel area.\nAppendix 4D.204\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nStandard Pushbutton Colors and Inscriptions: Use following color code and inscriptions for\n2 pushbuttons, unless otherwise noted in Instrument List, Article SUPPLEMENTS.\nTag Function Inscription(s) Color\n00 ON Red\nOFF Green\nOC OPEN Red\nCLOSE Green\nOCA OPEN Red\nCLOSE Green\nAUTO White\nOOA ON Red\nOFF Green\nAUTO White\nMA MANUAL Yellow\nAUTO White\nSS START Red\nSTOP Green\nRESET RESET Red\nEMERGENCY STOP EMERGENCY STOP Red\nUnused or Noninscribed Buttons Black.\n3 Standard Light Colors and Inscriptions: The following table gives the inscriptions for service legends,\n4 and the lens colors for indicating lights.\nTag Function Inscription Color\nON ON Red\nOFF OFF Green\nOPEN OPEN Red\nCLOSED CLOSED Green\nLOW LOW Green\nFAIL FAIL Amber\nHIGH HIGH Red\nAUTO AUTO White\nMANUAL MANUAL Yellow\nLOCAL LOCAL White\nREMOTE REMOTE Yellow\nAppendix 4D.205\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Lettering Color:\n2 Black on white and amber lenses.\n3 White on red and green lenses.\n4 Fabrication\n5 General: Panels with external dimensions and instruments arrangement as shown on Drawings.\n6 Panel Construction and Interior Wiring:\n7 In accordance with the National Electrical Code, state and local codes, NEMA, ANSI, UL, and\n8 ICECA.\n9 Fabricate panels, install instruments, wire, and plumb, at the PICS factory.\n10 Electrical Work: In accordance with Division 16, ELECTRICAL.\n11 Shop Assembly: No panel assembly other than correction of minor defects or minor transit damage shall\n12 be done on panels at site.\n13 UL Label for Enclosures: UL label stating \"Listed Enclosed Industrial Control Panel.\"\n14 Wiring Within PICS Panels:\n15 Routed through slotted PVC wiring duct with mating cover.\n16 Hinge Wiring:\n17 Secure at each end so that bending or twisting will be around longitudinal axis of wire. Protect bend\n18 area with sleeve.\n19 Arrange wiring neatly, cut to proper length, and remove surplus wire.\n20 Abrasion protection for wire bundles, which pass through holes or across edges of sheet metal.\n21 Connections to Screw Type Terminals:\n22 Locking-fork-tongue or ring-tongue lugs.\n23 Use manufacturer's recommended tool with required sized anvil to make crimp lug terminations and\n24 to avoid crossovers at a 90 degree angle.\n25 Wires terminated in a crimp lug, maximum of one.\n26 Lugs installed on a screw terminal, maximum of two.\n27 Connections to Compression Clamp Type Terminals:\n28 Strip, prepare, and install wires in accordance with terminal manufacturer's recommendations.\n29 Wires installed in a compression screw and clamp, maximum of one for field wires entering\n30 enclosure, otherwise maximum of two, or quantity as approved by manufacturer.\n31 Splicing and tapping of wires, allowed only at device terminals or terminal blocks.\n32 Terminate 24V dc and analog terminal blocks separate from 120V ac circuit terminal blocks.\n33 Separate analog and dc circuits by at least 6 inches from ac power and control wiring, except at\n34 unavoidable crossover points and at device terminations.\n35 Arrange wiring to allow access for testing, removal, and maintenance of circuits and components.\n36 Plastic Wire Ducts Fill: Do not exceed manufacturer's recommendation.\n37 Temperature Control:\n38 Freestanding Panels:\nAppendix 4D.206\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Nonventilated Panels: Size to adequately dissipate heat from equipment mounted inside panel or on\n2 panel.\n3 Ventilated Panels:\n4 Provide all ventilated panels with louvers and fans with filters or other cooling means as required to\n5 maintain internal temperature between 40 degrees F to 90 degrees F.\n6 For panels with backs against wall, furnish louvers on top and bottom of panel sides.\n7 For panels without backs against wall, furnish louvers on top and bottom of panel back.\n8 Louver Construction: Stamped sheet metal.\n9 Ventilation Fans:\n10 Furnish where required to provide adequate cooling.\n11 Create positive internal pressure within panel.\n12 Fan Motor Power: 120 volts, 60-Hz ac, thermostatically controlled.\n13 Air Filters: Washable aluminum, Hoffman Series A-FLT.\n14 Refrigerated System: Furnish where heat dissipation cannot be adequately accomplished with natural\n15 convection or forced ventilation. Smaller Panels (that are not freestanding): Size to adequately dissipate\n16 heat from equipment mounted inside panel or in panel face.\n17 Freestanding Panel Construction:\n18 Materials: Sheet steel, unless otherwise shown on Drawings with minimum thickness of 12-gauge,\n19 unless otherwise noted.\n20 Panel Fronts:\n21 Fabricated from a single piece of sheet steel, unless otherwise shown on Drawings.\n22 No seams or bolt heads visible when viewed from front.\n23 Panel Cutouts: Smoothly finished with rounded edges.\n24 Stiffeners: Steel angle or plate stiffeners or both on back of panel face to prevent panel deflection under\n25 instrument loading or operation.\n26 Internal Framework:\n27 Structural steel for instrument support and panel bracing.\n28 Permit panel lifting without racking or distortion.\n29 Lifting rings to allow simple, safe rigging and lifting of panel during installation.\n30 Adjacent Panels: Securely bolted together so front faces are parallel.\n31 Doors: Full height, fully gasketed access doors where shown on Drawings.\n32 Latches: Three-point, Southco Type 44.\n33 Handles: \"D\" ring, foldable type.\n34 Hinges: Full length, continuous, piano type, steel hinges with stainless steel pins.\n35 Rear Access Doors: Extend no further than 24 inches beyond panel when opened to 90-degree position.\n36 Front and Side Access Doors: As shown on Drawings.\n37 Nonfreestanding Panel Construction:\n38 Based on environmental design requirements required and referenced in Article ENVIRONMENTAL\n39 REQUIREMENTS, provide the following:\nAppendix 4D.207\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI For panels listed as inside:\n2 Enclosure Type: NEMA 12 in accordance with NEMA 250.\n3 Materials: Steel.\n4 For all other panels:\n5 Enclosure Type: NEMA 4X in accordance with NEMA 250.\n6 Materials: Type 316 stainless steel.\n7 Metal Thickness: 14-gauge, minimum.\n8 Doors:\n9 Rubber-gasketed with continuous hinge.\n10 Stainless steel lockable quick-release clamps.\n11 Manufacturers:\n12 Hoffman Engineering Co.\n13 H. F. Cox.\n14 Factory Finishing:\n15 Enclosures:\n16 Stainless Steel and Aluminum: Not painted.\n17 Nonmetallic Panels: Not painted.\n18 Steel Panels:\n19 Sand panel and remove mill scale, rust, grease, and oil.\n20 Fill imperfections and sand smooth.\n21 Prepare metal and paint panel interior and exterior with one coat of epoxy coating metal primer, two\n22 finish coats of two-component type epoxy enamel.\n23 Sand surfaces lightly between coats.\n24 Dry Film Thickness: 3 mils, minimum.\n25 Color: Light gray.\n26 Manufacturer's standard finish color, except where specific color is indicated. If manufacturer has no\n27 standard color, finish equipment with light gray color.\n28 Corrosion Protection\n29 Corrosion-Inhibiting Vapor Capsule Manufacturers:\n30 Northern Instruments; Model Zerust VC.\n31 Hoffmann Engineering Co; Model A-HCI.\n32 Source Quality Control\n33 Factory Demonstration Testing (FDT):\n34 Scope: Test PICS control panels to demonstrate panel assemblies are operational, prior to shipment:\n35 Location: PICS factory.\n36 Loop-Specific Functions: Demonstrate proper functions for each control loop, as shown on P&IDs and\n37 as required.\nAppendix 4D.208\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Make following documentation available to Construction Manager both before and after FDT:\n2 Master copy of FDT procedures.\n3 List of equipment to be tested including make, model, and serial number.\n4 Equipment and loop verification sheets signed by PICS Construction Subcontractor showing that each\n5 equipment and loop has been tested and has functioned properly.\n6 Part 3 -Execution\n7 Examination\n8 For equipment not provided by PICS, but that directly interfaces with the PICS, verify the following\n9 conditions:\n10 Proper installation.\n11 Calibration and adjustment of positioners and I/P transducers.\n12 Correct control action.\n13 Switch settings and dead bands.\n14 Opening and closing speeds and travel stops.\n15 Input and output signals.\n16 Report discrepancies to the Construction Manager.\n17 Installation\n18 Material and Equipment Installation: Retain a copy of manufacturers' instructions at site, available for\n19 review at all times.\n20 Electrical Wiring: As specified in Division 16, ELECTRICAL\n21 Removal or Relocation of Materials and Equipment:\n22 Remove from site materials that were part of the existing facility but are no longer used, unless\n23 otherwise directed by Construction Subcontractor to deliver to Construction General Contractor.\n24 Repair affected surfaces to conform to type, quality, and finish of surrounding surface.\n25 Construction Quality Control\n26 Testing:\n27 Onsite testing shall be required for each major process instrumentation and control system in\n28 accordance with this section and submitted/accepted test procedures. Provide personnel and\n29 equipment in support of PICS Continuity (PCT) and PICS Functionality (PFT) testing.\n30 Tests shall be performed to demonstrate that each function is implemented and operational. These\n31 tests are electrical component tests to be performed in advance of facility-wide construction\n32 acceptance testing (CAT). CAT shall be performed in accordance with Division 1 requirements.\n33 Copies of all tests shall be submitted as specified herein.\n34 Startup and Testing Team:\n35 Thoroughly inspect installation, termination, and adjustment for components and systems.\n36 Complete onsite tests.\n37 Complete onsite training.\n38 Provide startup assistance.\nAppendix 4D.209\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI PICS Continuity Test (PCT) Inspections and Calibrations: Prior to startup, inspect and test to ensure\n2 that entire PICS is ready for operation.\n3 Loop/Component Inspections and Calibrations:\n4 Check PICS for proper installation, calibration, and adjustment on a loop-by-loop and component-by-\n5 component basis.\n6 Prepare component calibration sheet for each active component (except simple hand switches, lights,\n7 gauges, and similar items).\n8 Project name.\n9 Loop number.\n10 Component tag number.\n11 Component code number.\n12 Manufacturer for elements.\n13 Model number/serial number.\n14 Summary of functional requirements, for example:\n15 Indicators and recorders, scale and chart ranges.\n16 Transmitters/converters, input and output ranges.\n17 Computing elements' function.\n18 Switching elements, unit range, differential (fixed/adjustable), reset (auto/manual).\n19 Calibrations, for example:\n20 Analog Devices: Actual inputs and outputs at 0, 10, 50, and 100 percent of span, rising and falling.\n21 Discrete Devices:\n22 Actual trip points and reset points.\n23 Space for comments.\n24 These inspections and calibrations will be witnessed by the Construction Manager or designated\n25 representative(s).\n26 PICS Functionality Test (PFT):\n27 General:\n28 Test all PICS elements to demonstrate that PICS satisfies all requirements.\n29 Test Format: Cause and effect.\n30 Person conducting test initiates an input (cause).\n31 Specific test requirement is satisfied if correct result (effect) occurs.\n32 Procedures, Forms, and Checklists:\n33 Conduct tests in accordance with, and documented on, Tank Farm Contractor accepted procedures,\n34 forms, and checklists.\n35 Describe each test item to be performed.\n36 Have space after each test item description for sign off by appropriate party after satisfactory\n37 completion.\n38 Required Test Documentation: Test procedures, forms, and checklists. All signed by Construction\n39 Manager and Construction General Contractor.\nAppendix 4D.210\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Conducting Tests:\n2 Provide special testing materials, equipment, and software.\n3 Wherever possible, perform tests using actual process variables, equipment, and data.\n4 If it is not practical to test with real process variables, equipment, and data, provide suitable means of\n5 simulation.\n6 Define simulation techniques in test procedures.\n7 Coordinate PICS testing with Construction Manager and affected Construction Subcontractors.\n8 Test Requirements:\n9 Once facility has been started up and is operating, perform a witnessed PFT on complete PICS to\n10 demonstrate that it is operating as required. Demonstrate each required function on a paragraph-by-\n11 paragraph and loop-by-loop basis.\n12 Perform local and manual tests for each loop before proceeding to remote and automatic modes.\n13 Where possible, verify test results using visual confirmation of process equipment and actual process\n14 variable. Unless otherwise directed, exercise and observe devices supplied by others, as needed to\n15 verify correct signals to and from such devices and to confirm overall system functionality. Test\n16 verification by means of disconnecting wires or measuring signal levels is acceptable only where\n17 direct operation of plant equipment is not possible.\n18 Make updated versions of documentation required for PFT available to Construction Manager at site,\n19 both before and during tests.\n20 Make one copy of O&M manuals available to Construction Manager at the site both before and\n21 during testing.\n22 Traininq\n23 General:\n24 Provide an integrated training program to meet specific needs of Tank Farm Contractor's personnel in\n25 accordance with submitted and accepted training plan.\n26 Include training sessions, classroom and field, for managers, engineers, operators, and maintenance\n27 personnel.\n28 Provide instruction on two working shifts as needed to accommodate the Tank Farm Contractor's\n29 personnel schedule.\n30 Tank Farm Contractor reserves the right to make and reuse video tapes of training sessions.\n31 Provide reference handouts that cover the course content for all personnel attending any course or\n32 training session.\n33 Operations and Maintenance Training:\n34 Include a review of O&M manuals and survey of spares, expendables, and test equipment.\n35 Use equipment similar to that provided or currently owned by Tank Farm Contractor.\n36 Provide training suitable for instrument technicians with at least a 2-year associate engineering or\n37 technical degree, or equivalent education and experience in electronics or instrumentation.\n38 Operations Training:\n39 Training Session Duration: One 8-hour instructor days.\n40 Number of Training Sessions: Two.\nAppendix 4D.211\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Location: Site.\n2 Content: Conduct training on loop-by-loop basis.\n3 Loop Functions: Understanding of loop functions, including interlocks for each loop.\n4 Loop Operation: For example, adjusting process variable set points, AUTO/MANUAL control transfer,\n5 AUTO and MANUAL control, annunciator acknowledgement and resetting.\n6 Interfaces with other control systems.\n7 Maintenance Training:\n8 Training Session Duration: One 8-hour instructor days.\n9 Number of Training Sessions: One.\n10 Location: Project site.\n11 Content: Provide training for each type of component and function provided.\n12 Loop Functions:\n13 Understanding details of each loop and how they function.\n14 Component calibration.\n15 Adjustments:\n16 For example, controller tuning constants, current switch trip points, and similar items.\n17 Troubleshooting and diagnosis for components.\n18 Replacing lamps, fuses.\n19 Component removal and replacement.\n20 Periodic maintenance.\n21 Cleaninq/Adjusting\n22 Repair affected surfaces to conform to type, quality, and finish of surrounding surface.\n23 Cleaning:\n24 Prior to closing system using tubing, clear tubing of interior moisture and debris.\n25 Upon completion of Work, remove materials, scraps, and debris from interior and exterior of\n26 equipment.\n27 Protection\n28 Protect enclosures and other equipment containing electrical, instrumentation and control devices,\n29 including spare parts, from corrosion through the use of corrosion-inhibiting vapor capsules.\n30 Periodically replace capsules in accordance with capsule manufacturer's recommendations. Replace\n31 capsules just prior to Final Payment and Acceptance.\n32 Supplements\n33 Supplements listed below, following \"END OF SECTION,\" are part of this Specification.\n34 Supplement 1-Instrument Listing for Cell No. I and Cell No. 2.\n35 Supplement 2-Component Specifications.\n36 Supplement 3-PLC Input and Output List.\n37 Supplement 4-Loop Specifications.\n38 Supplement 5-PLC and OIU Application Software Setpoints for Cells No. I and No. 2.\n39 END OF SECTION 13401\nAppendix 4D.212\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nInstrument Listing for Cell No. 1 & Cell No. 2 Instrument Listing Sorted by Equipment Number\nItem Rev Tag I Tag 2 Tag 3 Tag 4 Description Description Drawing Component Process Eng. Detail Comments\nArea Process ISA Eqt.# Number Ranges Units\nCrest Pad Building Control Reference rols on 48W x 20\"D x 72\"HighI 1 2 19(Y) LH CP 001 PnlEcoueH2805 131 IS NA Dwg. H-2-830857 EA1\nsheet I\nCrest Pad Building Control2 1 219(Y) LH CP 001 Pa Operator Interface Unit H-2-830855 Y50 NA Ethernet CommunicationI I Panel\n20 1 219(Y) LH CP 001 est Pad Building Control Main and Sub Breakers H-2-830855 1e30 PICS NAPanel 141PC\n21 1 219(Y) LH CP 001 Crnst Pad Building Control High Density Breakers H-2-830855 Re PICS NA\n22 1 219(Y) LH CP 001 est Pad Building Control Surge Protection H-2-830855 R PeICS NA\nSize power supplies for\n23 1 219(Y) LH CP 001 Crest Pad Building Control 24 V dc Power H-2-830855 Reference NA all control loops and\nPanel Supplies 13401 PICS various local control\npanel power\n24 1 219(Y) LH CP 001 Crest Pad Building Control PLC, I/O, Power H-2-830855 Y50 NAPanel Supply and Chassis\nCrest P ad Building Control PLC Programming and\n24 1 219(Y) LH CP 001 Pad Communication H-2-830855 Y50 NA\nSoftware\n24 1 219(Y) LH CP 001 nst Pad Building Control Programming Laptop H-2-830855 Y50 NAPanel\n25 1 219(Y) LH CP 001 Crest Pad Building Control Ethernet Switch and H-2-830855 Y50 NAPanel Mounting Bracket\n26 1 219(Y) LH CP 001 Crest Pad Building Control Wiring Duct H-2-830855 Reference NAPanel WiigDc --385 13401 PICS\n27 1 219(Y) LH CP 001 Crest Pad Building Control Wiring Terminal Strips H-2-830855 Reference NAPanel Analog 13401 PICS\n28 1 219(Y) LH CP 001 nst Pad Building Control Interposing Relays H-2-830855 1e30 PCS NAPanel 141PC\n29 1 219(Y) LH CP 001 Crest Pad Building Control Wiring Terminal Strips H-2-830855 Reference NAPanel Discrete and Power 13401 PICS\nCrest Pad Building Control Reference3 1 219(Y) LH CP 001 Pad Locking Mechanism H-2-830855 13401 PICS NA\nAppendix 4D.213\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nInstrument Listing for Cell No. I & Cell No. 2 Instrument Listing Sorted by Equipment Number\nTagi1 Tag 2 Tag 3 Tag 4 . Component Process Eng.\nItem Rev Description Description Drawing Number Ranges Units Detail Comments\nArea Process ISA Eqt.#\n30 1 219(Y) LH CP 001 nst Pad Building Control Cooling Fan H-2-830855 Re PCS NAPanel 141PC\nCrest Pad Building Control Temperature HReference Reference Controls on\n30 1 219(Y) LH CP 001 etPadnl Therae H-2-830855 13401 PICS NA Dwg. H-2-830857\n30 1 219Y) H CP 001 Panl Thrmotatsheet 2\n31 1 219(Y) LH CP 001 Crest Pad Building Control Programming H-2-830855 Reference NAPanel Receptacle 13401 PICS\n1050 VA, 120V in -\n120V outReference Controls on TheV usteha\n32 1 219(Y) LH CP 001 Crest Pad Building Control Uninterruptible Power H-2-830855 Y40 NA Dwg. H-2-830857 Ud ss em ad\nPanelSuppy shet 2been disconnected and\nremoved and may be\nreinstalled in the future.\n33 1 219(Y) LH CP 001 nst Pad Building Control Incandescent Lighting H-2-830855 R1 e CS NA\nReference Controls onCrest Pad Building Control Reference NAernc Dongol on-305\n34 1 219(Y) LH CP 001 Panel Signal Isolators H-2-830855 13401 PICS NA Dwg. H-2-830857\nsheet 2\n96 1 219(Y) LH CP 001 Crest Pad Building Control Alarm Dialer H-2-830855 Y51 NA NA96 1 219Y) L CP 001 Panel\n97 1 219(Y) LH CP 001 Crest Pad Building Control Cellular Modem H-2-830855 Y52 NA NA1 29() H P 01 Panel (CDMA)\nReference Controls on 16\"W x 8\"D x 16\"H\n40 1 219(Y) LH LCP 002 CrestlPad BuldgSump Enclosure H-2-830855 Reerle CS NA Dwg. H-2-830857 NEMA 4X with internal\nsheet 2 relays, terminals\nReference Controls on 16\"W x 8\"D x 16\"H\n1 1 219(Y) LH LCP 003 Combined up nr 1 Enclosure H-2-830855 Rer eCS NA Dwg. H-2-830857 NEMA 4X with internal\n1 sheet 2 relays, terminals\nSS T ofReference Controls on 16\"W x 8\"D x 16\"H\n68 1 219(Y)201 LH LCP 004 Leachate Storage Tank Local osure H-2-830855 Refer eCS NA Dwg. H-2-830857 NEMA 4X with internal\nsheet 2 relays, terminals\nReference Controls on 16\"W x 8\"D x 16\"H\n42 1 219(Y)1 LH LCP 005 Local Control Panel Enclosure H-2-830855 R31PICS NA Dwg. H-2-830857 NEMA 4X with internal\nsheet 2 relays, terminals\n91 1 219(Y) LH LCP 208 Secondary Leachate Enclosure she2et] f54 1e30 PCS NA NA H-2-830849 16 W x 18\" H x 9\" D\nCollection System Local 4NEMA 4X -fiberglass\nAppendix 4D.214\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nInstrument Listing for Cell No. I & Cell No. 2 Instrument Listing Sorted by Equipment Number\nItem Rev 2Tg3 a Component Process Eng. ealCmet\nItem Rev ag Pcess TS T 4 Description Description Drawing Number Ranges Detail Comments\nControl Panel sheet 2 of 2 reinforced polyester,\nwith Data logger,\ninput/output channel,\nsignal converter,\ncommunications,\nrechargeable battery, and\ncharge controller\nL5219208LSecondaH L Leachate Loop Powered Process H-2-830854 H-2-830849 Red Lion, Model\n95 1 2 19(Y) LH LD 28 Collection System Local Indicator sheet I of 4 NA NA CBL\nControl Panel sheet 2 of 2 CBL\n4 1 219(Y) LH LI 101 Leachate Collection and Panel Mount Level H-2-830854 S27 0 to 26.75 InchesRemoval System Indicator sheet 1 of 4\nLeachate Collection and Submersible Pressure 11-2-830L54 Detail No. 6 on Dwg. Sensor supplied with43 1 219(Y) Lt-i LT 101 Reoa ytmTasue he f4 L42 0 to 26.75 Inches H-28308S4 termination enclosure\nReoaIytmTasdcrsetIo (TBX)\n5 1 219(Y) LH LI 104 Leak Detection System Panel Mount Level H-2-830854 S27 0 to 26.75 InchesIndicator sheet I of 4\nSensor supplied with\ntermination enclosure\n44 1 219(Y) LH LT 104 Leak Detection System Transducer sheet I of 4 L42 0 to 26.75 Inches (TB urder is ection\nand installed by pump\nvendor\n45 1 219(Y) LH HS 105 Crest Pad Building Sump Local Control Panel H-2-830854 M12 NA On/ Bypass OperationControl Panel Mount Handswitch sheet I of 4 Off\nH-2-830854 Actuate Detail No. 4 on Dwg. 1/4\" stem actuation from\n46 1 219(Y) LH LDE 105 Crest Pad Building Sump Leak Detection Sensor sheet 1 of 4 L109 elevation Feet H-2-830854 bottom720.5\nCrest Pad Building Sump H-2-830854 Actuate Detail No. I on Dwg.\n47 I 219(Y) LH LSH 105 st Level Float sheet I of4 L8 elevation Feet H-2-830854\nHigh 722.0\nCrest Pad Building Sump Level Float 28 44 L8 v Detail No. I on Dwg.8 29() H SH 05 Hih ih evl lotsheet I of 4 L8 elevation Feet H-2-3085419(Y LH SHH 105 igh igh723.0\nCrest Pad Building Sump Level Float H-2-830854 Actuate Detail No. I on Dwg.\n9 1 219(Y) LH LSL 105 asheet I of4 L8 elevation Feet H-2-830854Low 721.0\nAppendix 4D.215\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nInstrument Listing for Cell No. 1 & Cell No. 2 Instrument Listing Sorted by Equipment Number\nItem Rev Tag I Tag 2 Tag 3 Tag 4 Description Description Drawing Component Process Eng Detail Comments\nArea Process ISA Eqt.# Number Ranges Units\n50 1 219(Y) LH HS 107 Combined Sump Instrinsic Local Control Panel H-2-830854 M12 NA On/ Bypass OperationSafety Local Control Panel Mount Handswitch sheet 2 of 4 Off\nActuateH-1-830854 AtaeDetail No. 4 on Dwg. 1/4\" stem actuation from51 1 219(Y) LH LDE 107 Combined Sump Pump Leak Detection Sensor --L109 elevation Feet I-ea83N84 bottm\nsheet 2 of 4 714,2\n52 1 29Y HH-2-830854 Actuate DetaiNoIonDg52 1LSH 107 Combined Sump High Level Float e 4 L8 elevation Feet i 13No 1 on Dwg.\n718.0\nH-2-830854 Actuate DetaiNoIonDg53 1 219(Y) LH LSHH 107 Combined Sump High High Level Float sh f54 L8 elevation Feet ie 1No 1 on Dwg.\n719.0\nH-2-830854 Actuate DetaiNoIonDg54 1 219(Y) LH LSL 107 Combined Sump Low Level Float sheet 2 of 4 F H2-830854\n717.0\nH-2-830854 Actuate DetaiNoIonDg55 1 219(Y) LH LSLL 107 Combined Sump Low Low Level Float --4 L8 elevation Feet il1No. I on Dwg.\n715.0\nSecondary Leachate Submersible Pressure H-2-830854 DA2 0 to 26.75 Inches Detail Noe6onDg st de92 1 219(Y) LH LT 108 Collection System Transducer sheet I of 4 4h-2-83056 2V de\nBattery powered flow\n94 1 219(Y) LH FE 208 Secondary Leachate Flow Meter H-2-830854 1 to 20 GPM meter (Omega FTB 790\nCollection System sheet I of 4 Series or approved\nqual).\nLeachate Collection and Panel Mount Flow 11-2-8308547 1 219(Y) LH Fl 202 Removal System Low Flow Indicator sheet I of 4 S27 0 to 25 GPM 0-30 PSI Range\nPump\n56 1 219(Y) LH FIT 202 Leachate Collection and In-Line Flow H--830854 F4 0 to 25 GPM Section A on Dwg. H- 0-30 PSI Range with56 1 29Y H FT 22 Removal System Low Flow Magmeter sheet I of 4 F40t 5 GM2-830947 integral transmitter\nPump\n57 2 19(Y) LH HS 202 Leachate Collection and Motor Control H-2-830854 2 A Provided under Section\nPu129() L IS 22 RmpvlSsemLwFo Handswitch sheet I of 4 MJ A16440Pump\nLeachate Collection and1-2805030PIRnewt\n84 1 219(Y) LH P1 202 Removal System Low Flow Pressure Gauge 11-2-83 084 P4/P6 0 to 30 PSI 0-30 PSI RangelwithPump\nAppendix 4D.216\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nInstrument Listing for Cell No. 1 & Cell No. 2 Instrument Listing Sorted by Equipment Number\nRev Tag I Tag 2 Tag 3 Tag 4 Component Process Eng. Detail Comments Itm RvDescription Description Drawing umber RangeeUnit\nArea Process ISA Eqt.# N r Ranges Units\nLeachate Collection and Motor Control On H-2-830854 ro\\jtk4 under Section\n58 1 219(Y) LH YL 202 Removal System Low Flow Indicator sbeet 1 of 4 I d NA 1644c\nPump\n8 1 219(Y) LH FI 203 Leachate Collection and Panel Mount Flow H-2-830854 S27 0 to 250 PM 0-60 PSI Range8 1 219(Y) LH F1 203 Removal System Higb Flow Indicator sbeet I of4 S20to50 GM06PIRag\nPump\nLeacbate Collection and In-Line Flow H-2-830854 SectinAo w.H060PIRgeit\n59 1 219(Y) LH FIT 203 Removal System High Flow InLie Flow H--384 F4 0 to 250 GPM ion A on Dwg. H- 0-60 PSI Range with\nPump Magmeter sheet 1 of 4 2-830847 integral transmitter\n60 1 219(Y) LH HS 203 ILeachate Collection and Motor Control H-2-830854 1NA Provided under Section6 1 21() L HS 23 Removal System Higb Flow Handawitch sheet 1 of 4 16410\nPump\nLeachate Collection and H-2-830854 0-60 PSI Range with\n85 1 219(Y) LH PI 203 Removal System High Flow Pressure Gauge sheet I of 4 P4/P6 0 to 60 PSI Diaphragm Seal\nPump\nLeachate Collection and Motor Control On H-2-830854 12 I A I 1644061 1 1(Y LPu 03 RmpvlSse ihFo Indicator sheet I of 4 M1IN164\n9 1 219(Y) LH FI 204 Leak Detection System Pump Inuc t shee I-of84 S27 0 to 15 GPM 0-15 PSI Range\n62 1 219(Y) LH FIT 204 Leak Detection System Pump In-Line Flow H-2-830854 F4 0 to 15 GPM Section A on Dwg. H- 0-15 PSI Range with\nIMagmeter sheet 1 of 4 2-830847 integral transmitter\nMotor Control H-2-830854 Prvddude eto63 1 219(Y) LH HS 204 Leak Detection System Pump Handswitch sheet 1 of4 \\f > APfd under Section\nHa2-830854 sh-It PS Rang with44\n86 1 219(Y) LH PI 204 Leak Detection System Pump Pressure Gauge Heet810of4 P4/P6 0 to 15 PSI 0-1 h I Range ith\nMotor Control On H-2-830854 Provided under Sect ion64 1 219(Y) LH YL 204 Leak Detection System Pump Indictor On e H- of 54 M2A P\n65 1 219(Y) LH HS 205 Crest Pad Building Sump Motor Control H-2-830854 M12 A rovided under Section\nPump Handswitch sheet I of 4 16440\n89 1 219(Y) LH PI 205 Crest Pad Building Sump Pressure Gauge H-2-830854 P4/P6 0 to 15 PSI 0-15 PSI Range with\nPump sheet I of 4 Diaphragm Seal\nCrest Pad Building Sump Motor Control On H-2-830854 Provided under Section6 1 219(Y) LH YL 1205 Pump Indicator sheet I of 4 16440\nAppendix 4D.217\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nInstrument Listing for Cell No. 1 & Cell No. 2 Instrument Listing Sorted by Equipment Number\nItem Rev TagI Tag2 Tag3 g4 Description Description Drawing Component Process Engs Detail Comments\nArea Process ISA Eqt.#Nubr Rne Uit\nWall-Mounted Reference\n93 1 219(Y) LH DPI 206 Crest Pad Building Differential Pressure H2830854 15100 0 TO 15 PSID \\Vth re-settable drag\nFILTERS)\n67 1 219(Y) LH 1S 207 Combined Sump Pump Motor Control H-2-830854 12 N Provided under Section\nHandswitch sheet 2 of4 f12N 16440\n. ~Motor Control On H1-2-830854 PrvddudrSco69 1 219(Y) LH YL 207 Combined Sump Pump Indicator sheet 2 f 4 NA Povided und4r0eetnIndiatorshet 2 f 416440'\n1 Control Panel Mount H-2-830854 Alarm Acknowledge\n12 1 219(Y) LH HS 219 CrestPad Building Switch sheet I of 4 MI2 NA Switch\nH-2-830854 Reference Power Relay mounted70 1 219(Y) LH JSH 219 Crest Pad Buildig Power Relay sheet I of 4 13401 PICS NA inside Control Panel\n10 1 219(Y) LH TI 219 Crest Pad Building Panel Mount Temp H-2-830854 S27 -40 to 104 'FIndicator sheet 2 of 4\n71 1 219(Y) LH TIT 219 Crest Pad Building Temperature H-2-830854 T3 -40 to 104 *F With integral transmitterTransmitter sheet I of 4\n72 1 219(Y) LH YAL 219 Crest Pad Building Alarm Light H1-2-830854 M31 NAsheet I of 4\n11 1 219(Y)1 LH TI 220 Leachate Transfer Building Panel Mount Temp H-2-830854 S27 -40 to 104 F iig Indicator sheet 2 of 4\n73 1 219(Y)1 LH TIT 220 Leachate Transfer Building Temperature H-2-830854 T3 -40 to 104 'F With integral transmitterI 29(Yl L TI 22 Lechae Tanser uiling Transmitter sheet 2 of 4\n74 11~-2-830854 M1N74 1 219(Y)1 LH YAL 220 Leachate Transfer Building Alarm Light sheet 2 of 4 M31 NA\n88 1 219(201 LH HS 301 Leachate Storage Tank Local Local Control Panel H-2-830854 MI2 NA On/ Bypass OperationControl Panel Mount Handswitch sheet 2 of4 Off\nH-2-830854 Actuate Detail No. 2 on Dwg.\n75 1 219(Y)201 LH LSHH 301 Leachate Storage Tank Level Switch sheet 2 of 4 L1A elevation Feet H-2-830854728.33\nH-2-830854 Actuate Detail No. 2 on Dwg.76 1 219(Y)201 LH LSLL 301 Leachate Storage Tank Level Switch sheet 2 of 4 L1A elevation Feet H-2-830854722.7\nSubmersible Pressure H-2-830854 Detail No. 3 on Dwg. Sensor supplied with\n77 1 219(Y)201 LH LT 301 Leachate Storage Tank Transducer sheet 2 of 4 1A2 0 to 108 Inches H-2-830854 termination enclosure\nI___ _(TBX) and Lightning\nAppendix 4D.218\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nInstrument Listing for Cell No. I & Cell No. 2 Instrument Listing Sorted by Equipment Number\nItem Rev Tag I Pr c Tag 3 Description Description Drawing Component Process Eng Detail Comments\nArea Process ISA Eqt.# Number Ranges Units\nArrestor\n78 1 219(Y)201 LH LI 301-1 Leachate Storage Tank Local Control Panel H-2-830854 S27 0 to 108 InchesProvide Signal Isolator,Mount Level Indicator sheet 2 of 4 S70t18 Inhsand Lightning Arrestor\n6 1 219(Y)201 LH LI 301-2 Leachate Storage Tank Panel Mount Level H-2-83054 S27 0 to 108 Inches Provide Signal IsolatorIndicator sheet 2 of 4\nPanel Mount Motor H-2-830854 M12 NA On/ Motor On/Off control79 I 219(Y)1 LH HS 302 Leachate Transfer Pump Control Handswitch sheet 2 of 4 Off switch\n87 1 219(Y)1 LH Pl 302 Leachate Transfer Pump Pressure Gauge (Load) H-2-830854 P4/P6 0 to 15 PSI 0-15 PSI Range with\n87 1 219(Y~~l sheet 2 of 4 P4P t 5 PIDiaphragm Seal\n90 1 219(Y)l LH P1 303 Leachate Transfer Pump Pressure Gauge H-2-830854 P4/P6 0 to 100 Inches 0-100 Inches Range with\n(Suction) sheet 2 of 4 Diaphragm Seal\nFIT/FQ In-Line Flow H-2-830854 Section A nDg -0- 15 PSI Range. Flow\n80 1 219(Y)l LH I 302-1 Leachate Transfer Pump a t sheet 4 F4 0 to 300 GPM 2-830851 D H T Integra with\nsame indicator.\nLocal Control Panel H-2-830854\n81 1 219(Y)I LH YL 302-1 Leachate Transfer Pump Mount Motor Control sheet 2 of 4 M12 NA\nOn Indicator\nLocal Control Panel H-2-830854 Flow and Total Integral\n82 1 219(Y)l LH FQI 302-2 Leachate Transfer Pump Mount Flow Totalizer sheet 2 of 4 S27 0 to 10,000 Gal to same meter, Provided\nIndicator Signal Isolator\nMoto ConrolOn H2-83854Provided under Section83 1 219(Y)l LH YL 302-2 Leachate Transfer Pump Motor Control On -2-830854 12 NA\nIIndicator sheet 2 of 4 -. 16440\n(Y) = A for Cell No. I For Cell No. I reference corresponding H-2-830854 sheet I of 4 and sheet 2 of 4.\n(Y) = E for Cell No. 2 For Cell No. 2 reference corresponding H-2-830854 sheet 3 of 4 and sheet 4 of 4.\nAppendix 4D.219\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Component Specifications\n2 F4 Flow Element and Transmitter, Electromagnetic:\n3 General:\n4 Function: Measure, indicate, and transmit the flow of a conductive process liquid in a full pipe.\n5 Type:\n6 Electromagnetic flowmeter, with operation based on Faraday's Law, utilizing the pulsed dc type coil\n7 excitation principle with high impedance electrodes.\n8 Full bore meter with magnetic field traversing entire flow-tube cross section.\n9 Unacceptable are insert magmeters or multiple single point probes inserted into a spool piece.\n10 Parts: Flow element, transmitter, interconnecting cables, and mounting hardware. Other parts as noted.\n11 Service:\n12 Stream Fluid:\n13 As noted.\n14 Suitable for liquids with a minimum conductivity of 5 microS/cm and for demineralized water with a\n15 minimum conductivity of 20 microS/cm.\n16 Flow Stream Descriptions: If and as described below.\n17 Operating Temperature:\n18 Element:\n19 Ambient: Minus 5 to 140 degrees F, typical, unless otherwise noted.\n20 Process: Minus 5 to 140 degrees F, typical, unless otherwise noted.\n21 Transmitter:\n22 Ambient: Minus 5 to 140 degrees F, typical, unless otherwise noted.\n23 Storage: 15 to 120 degrees F, typical, unless otherwise noted.\n24 Performance:\n25 Flow Range: As noted.\n26 Accuracy: Plus or minus 0.5 percent of rate for all flows resulting from pipe velocities of 2 to 33 feet per\n27 second.\n28 Turndown Ratio: Minimum of 10 to 1 when flow velocity at minimum flow is at least 1 foot per\n29 second.\n30 Features:\n31 Zero stability feature to eliminate the need to stop flow to check zero alignment.\n32 No obstructions to flow.\n33 Very low pressure loss.\n34 Measures bi-directional flow.\n35 Process Connection:\n36 Meter Size (diameter inches): As noted.\n37 Connection Type: 150-pound ANSI raised-face flanges or wafer style depending on meter size, unless\n38 otherwise noted.\nAppendix 4D.220\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Flange Material: Carbon steel, unless otherwise noted.\n2 Power (Transmitter): 120V ac, 60-Hz, unless otherwise noted.\n3 Element:\n4 Meter Tube Material: Type 304 or 316 stainless steel, unless otherwise noted.\n5 Liner Material:\n6 Teflon, unless otherwise noted.\n7 Low activated waste leachate solution.\n8 Liner Protectors: Covers (or grounding rings) on each end to protect liner during shipment.\n9 Electrode Type: Flush or bullet nose as recommended by the manufacturer for the noted stream fluid.\n10 Electrode Material: Type 316 stainless steel or Hastelloy C, unless otherwise noted.\n11 Grounding Ring:\n12 Required, unless otherwise noted.\n13 Material: Type 316 stainless steel, unless otherwise noted.\n14 Enclosure: NEMA 4X, minimum, unless otherwise noted.\n15 Transmitter:\n16 Mounting: Integral, unless otherwise noted.\n17 Display:\n18 Required, unless otherwise noted.\n19 Digital LCD display, indicating flow rate and total.\n20 Bi-directional Flow Display:\n21 Required, unless otherwise noted.\n22 Forward flow rate.\n23 Forward, net totalization.\n24 Parameter Adjustments: By keypad or non-intrusive means.\n25 Enclosure: NEMA 4X, minimum, unless otherwise noted.\n26 Empty Pipe Detection: Drives display and outputs to zero when empty pipe\n27 Signal Interface (at Transmitter):\n28 Analog Output:\n29 Isolated 4 to 20 mA dc for load impedance from 0 to at least 500 ohms minimum for 24V dc supply.\n30 Supports Superimposed Digital HART protocol.\n31 Cables:\n32 Types: As recommended by manufacturer.\n33 Lengths: As required to accommodate device locations.\n34 Built-in Diagnostic System:\nAppendix 4D.221\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Features:\n2 Field programmable electronics.\n3 Self-diagnostics with troubleshooting codes.\n4 Ability to program electronics with full scale flow, engineering units, meter size, zero flow cutoff,\n5 desired signal damping, totalizer unit digit value, etc.\n6 Initial flow tube calibration and subsequent calibration checks.\n7 Factory Calibration:\n8 Calibrated in an ISO 9001 and NIST certified factory.\n9 Factory flow calibration system must be certified by volume or weight certified calibration devices.\n10 Factory flow calibration system shall be able to maintain calibration flow rate for at least 5 minutes\n11 for repeatability point checks.\n12 Factory Ready for Future In situ Verifications: If noted.\n13 Original meter parameter values available from vendor by request.\n14 Accessories:\n15 In situ Verification System: If noted.\n16 Quantity:\n17 One complete system provided for the project.\n18 Verifies quantitatively that the meter and signal converter's present condition is the same as originally\n19 manufactured.\n20 Physical access to the flow-tube not required.\n21 Meet standards established by the National Testing Laboratory.\n22 Tests and stores over 50-meter parameters related to primary coils, electrodes, interconnecting cable\n23 and signal converter.\n24 Verification standard shall be plus or minus 1 percent of wet calibration for meters produced using\n25 the calibration verification service, or plus or minus 2 percent for standard meters.\n26 Windows-based software\n27 Primary Simulation System: If noted.\n28 Quantity:\n29 One complete system provided for the project.\n30 Verifies proper operation of the signal converter by simulating the flow meter's output signal.\n31 Generates pulsed dc excitation signal with a reference voltage of 70 mV.\n32 Generated signal ranges from 0 to 99 percent (0 to 32.8 feet per second) with a resolution of\n33 0.1 percent.\n34 Switch selectable for forward, reverse and zero flow rate.\n35 Verifies various input and output signals.\n36 Manufacturers:\n37 Krohne Electromagnetic Integral Systems: Aqua Flux Flowmeter (size: 3/8 to 120 inches).\n38 Endress & Hauser, Inc. Flow Measuring System: Promag 50/53W (size: I to 78 inches).\n39 Invensys Foxboro (includes IMT 25 Series Intelligent Magnetic Flow Transmitter): 9100A Series\n40 Flanged Body Flow Tubes (size: I to 78 inches).\nAppendix 4D.222\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 L1A Multipoint Level Element and Switches, Admittance:\n2 General:\n3 Function: Operate switches at two separate, distinct, preset product levels in a vessel.\n4 Type: Admittance using low power radio frequency circuit.\n5 Parts: Element and electronics unit. For remote mount, interconnecting cable.\n6 Service: Fluid as noted.\n7 Performance:\n8 Set Points: As noted.\n9 Temperature:\n10 Operating range minus 40 to 140 degrees F.\n11 Unaffected by coating buildup on element.\n12 Features:\n13 Electronics Unit:\n14 Filtering: Built-in RFI protection.\n15 Fail-Safe Contacts: Field convertible switch action.\n16 Enclosure Type: Explosion-proof and weatherproof (NEMA 4).\n17 Electronics Mounting: Integrally with element, unless otherwise noted.\n18 When remote, provide cable with length as required to accommodate device locations.\n19 Response Time: 20 milli-seconds standard, or as noted.\n20 Element:\n21 Type: Probe rod.\n22 Insertion Length: As required to achieve noted set points.\n23 Material: 316 stainless steel, unless otherwise noted.\n24 Rating: Element and cable intrinsically safe.\n25 Grounding Element: Required for nonmetallic tank applications.\n26 Process Connection: 3/4-inch NPT unless otherwise noted.\n27 Signal Interface: Contacts, 3 DPDT rated 5A continuous at 120V ac, minimum.\n28 Power: 120V ac 50/60-Hz, or as noted.\n29 Manufacturers and Products:\n30 Drexelbrook; Model 506-3100.\n31 Princo.\n32 Endress & Hauser, Inc.\n33 L8 Level Switch, Float:\n34 General:\n35 Function: Actuate contact at preset liquid level.\n36 Type: Direct-acting float with an enclosed mercury switch and integral cable.\nAppendix 4D.223\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Service: Liquid; low activated waste leachate solution, unless otherwise noted.\n2 Performance:\n3 Set Point: As noted.\n4 Differential: 1-inch maximum.\n5 Temperature: 0 to 180 degrees F.\n6 Features:\n7 Entire Assembly: Watertight and impact-resistant.\n8 Float Material and Size: Polyethylene/foam filled; 4.5-inch diameter tear drop.\n9 Cable:\n10 Combination support and signal.\n11 Length as noted or as necessary per mounting requirements.\n12 Type SO nitrile PVC jacket, AWG No. 18/2 or No. 18/4.\n13 Mounting:\n14 Pipe:\n15 Cable-to-pipe clamp, corrosion-proof cable for 1-inch pipe.\n16 Pipe-to-wall bracket for 1-inch pipe.\n17 Suspended Type: As noted.\n18 Signal Interface:\n19 Switch Type: Mercury tilt.\n20 Switch Contacts:\n21 Isolated, rated 4.5A continuous at 120V ac.\n22 As required (for example INO, 1NO+INC) to meet functional requirements, or as shown.\n23 Manufacturers and Products:\n24 Consolidated Electric Co.; Model LS.\n25 Anchor Scientific; Roto-Float, Type P/Type S.\n26 L42 Level Element/Transmitter, Submersible, Wastewater:\n27 General:\n28 Function: Measure and transmit a signal proportional to level.\n29 Type: Totally submersible pressure sensor (loop powered).\n30 Parts: Sensor, interconnecting cable, sensor termination enclosure.\n31 Service:\n32 Fluid: Wastewater, unless otherwise noted.\n33 Performance:\n34 Process Range:\n35 As noted.\n36 Provide fixed factory range such that noted process range is between 40 and 80 percent of fixed\n37 factory range.\nAppendix 4D.224\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Accuracy: 0.25 percent of full scale.\n2 Temperature, Operating: Minus 4 to plus 140 degrees F.\n3 Overpressure:\n4 Range dependent.\n5 4X for ranges of 5 psig and above (to a maximum of 2,000 psi).\n6 Greater than 4X for ranges below 5 psig.\n7 Long Term Stability: Plus or minus 0.1 percent full scale/year, typical.\n8 Features:\n9 Sensor:\n10 Silicon sensing element.\n11 Titanium body.\n12 Diaphragm: Titanium isolation, unless otherwise noted.\n13 Pressure Connection:\n14 Depth cone with radial inlet holes.\n15 NEMA 6 rating (submersible to 2,300 feet).\n16 Temperature Compensation: Plus 30 to 80 degrees F.\n17 Dimensions:\n18 Not to exceed 8.5L by 1.1 diameter, inches, nominal.\n19 Loop powered, 9-30V dc.\n20 Open face with perforated Protective Plate: Not to exceed 1.35 diameter, inches.\n21 Interconnecting Cable:\n22 Length:\n23 As required.\n24 Polyurethane sheathed.\n25 Kevlar strain relief cord.\n26 Integral vent tube.\n27 Sensor Termination Enclosure:\n28 Enclosure:\n29 NEMA 4X, PVC/polycarbonate.\n30 Desiccant module.\n31 Micro filter.\n32 Wall and 2-Inch Pipe Mounting Kit: Required, unless otherwise noted.\n33 Lightning Arrestor(s): Required, unless otherwise noted.\n34 Signal Interface: 4 to 20 Ma dc output, for load impedance of 0 to 750 ohms, minimum for 24V dc\n35 supply without load adjustment.\n36 Area Classification: Intrinsically safe; certified for use in Class 1, Division 1, Groups A, B, C, and D\n37 atmospheres.\n38 Manufacturers:\nAppendix 4D.225\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Druck; Type PTX 1830 with STEI 10.\n2 Pressure Systems, Inc. KPSI; Series 720 with Series 815 Aneroid Bellows and Series 840 Junction Box.\n3 Or approved equivalent.\n4 L109 Level Detection Switch, Rises on Stem:\n5 General:\n6 Function: Actuate contact at preset liquid level.\n7 Type: Direct acting; rises on stem.\n8 Service: Liquid, water, wastewater, unless otherwise noted.\n9 Performance:\n10 Set point as noted.\n11 Switch Actuation Point: Approximately 3/4-inch distance from end of stem to weighted support collar.\n12 Operating Temperature Range: Minus 40 to plus 110 degrees F.\n13 Features:\n14 Assembly Material: Brass stem, Buna N Float, and Type 316 stainless steel wetted parts.\n15 Float Size: 2-inch diameter.\n16 Mounting: Suspension cable with compact-sized float, slosh shield, and weighted collar suspended in\n17 standpipes or sumps for leak detection.\n18 Signal Interface:\n19 Switch Type: Magnetic reed switch.\n20 Switch Contacts:\n21 SPST Isolated, rated at 20 VA.\n22 NC (by inverting float on unit stem).\n23 Cable and Lead Wires: No. 22 AWG, 25 feet of length of PVC jacketed cable.\n24 Manufacturer and Product: GEMS; Specialty Switches Liquid Level Switch, Model LS-750.\n25 M12 Hand Switch and Light, Oiltight, Round:\n26 General:\n27 Function: Select, initiate, and display discrete control functions.\n28 Type: Heavy-duty, oiltight, industrial.\n29 General Features:\n30 Mounting: 30.5 mm single round hole. Panel thickness 1/16 inch to 1/4 inch.\n31 Legend Plate: Standard size square style aluminum field and black markings, unless otherwise noted.\n32 Markings as shown.\n33 Configuration: Light, pushbutton, or switch as noted or shown.\n34 Light Features:\n35 Lights: 6V ac lamps and integral transformer for operation from 120V ac, unless otherwise noted.\nAppendix 4D.226\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Lens Color: Color as specified under PANEL, STANDARD LIGHT COLOR AND INSCRIPTIONS, or\n2 as noted.\n3 Pushbutton and Switch Features:\n4 Guard: Full guard with flush button, unless otherwise noted.\n5 Operator: Black pushbutton, black non-illuminated knob on switch, unless otherwise noted.\n6 Boot: None, unless otherwise noted.\n7 Signal Interface:\n8 Contact Block:\n9 Type: Silver-coated butting, unless otherwise noted.\n10 Rating: 10 amps continuous at 120V ac or as noted.\n11 Sequence: Break-before-make, unless otherwise shown.\n12 Arrangement: Normally open or normally closed as shown, or perform functions noted.\n13 Terminals: Screw with strap clamp, unless otherwise noted.\n14 NEMA Rating: NEMA 4, watertight and dusttight and NEMA 13, oiltight.\n15 Manufacturers/Models:\n16 Allen-Bradley; Bulletin 800T.\n17 Eaton Corp.; Cutler-Hammer, Type 10250T.\n18 Square D Co.; Class 9001, Type K.\n19 M31 Warning Light, Indoor/Outdoor:\n20 General:\n21 Function: Visual alarm.\n22 Type: Rotating reflector or flashing bulb.\n23 Parts: Light and spare bulbs.\n24 Performance:\n25 Temperature, Operating: Minus 35 to 190 degrees F.\n26 Flash Rate: Nominally 90 per minute.\n27 Features:\n28 Dome Color: Amber, unless otherwise noted.\n29 Lamp Life: 200 hours.\n30 Lamp: Incandescent/25 watts.\n31 Enclosure:\n32 Type: Water-resistant closed cell neoprene gasket.\n33 Mounting: Wall bracket, unless otherwise noted.\n34 UL Listing: Indoor/outdoor use.\n35 Power: 120V ac, 50/60-Hz.\n36 Spare Bulbs: Two for each light.\nAppendix 4D.227\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Manufacturers:\n2 Federal Signal; Model 225.\n3 Benjamin Electric Manufacturing; Series KL-4000.\n4 P4 Pressure Gauge:\n5 General:\n6 Function: Pressure indication.\n7 Type: Bourdon tube or bellows.\n8 Performance:\n9 Scale Range: As noted.\n10 Accuracy: Plus or minus 0.50 percent of full scale for Bourdon tube. Plus or minus 2-1-2% of span\n11 (ASME B 40.1 Grade A).\n12 Features:\n13 Liquid Filled:\n14 Required unless otherwise noted.\n15 Glycerin fill, unless otherwise noted.\n16 Dial: 4-1/2-inch diameter, unless otherwise noted.\n17 Case Material: Black phenolic plastic, unless otherwise noted.\n18 Element Material: Phosphor-bronze, unless otherwise noted.\n19 Pointer: Micrometer-adjustable.\n20 Movement: Stainless steel, Teflon coated bearings, rotary geared.\n21 Window: Glass, unless otherwise noted.\n22 Socket Materials:\n23 Brass, unless otherwise noted.\n24 Threaded reinforced polypropylene front ring for easy zero adjustment.\n25 Case Type: Solid front with solid wall between window and element. Rear of case, gasketed pressure\n26 relief.\n27 Process Connection:\n28 Mounting: Lower stem, unless otherwise noted.\n29 Size: 1/2 inch, unless otherwise noted.\n30 Connection Type: Threaded (NPT).\n31 Manufacturers and Products:\n32 Ashcroft; Duragauge Model 1279/1379.\n33 Ashcroft LP Bellows Gauge Model 1188.\n34 Weksler; Royal Process Gauge Model AAXX.\n35 Ametek U.S. Gauge; Solfrunt Model 19XX.\nAppendix 4D.228\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 P6 Pressure Seal, Diaphragm:\n2 General:\n3 Function: Isolate sensing element from process fluid.\n4 Type: Fluid filled, corrosion resistant.\n5 Service:\n6 Pressure: Same as associated sensor.\n7 Temperature: As noted.\n8 Features:\n9 Material Lower Housing: Type 316 stainless steel, unless otherwise noted.\n10 Diaphragm Material: Type 316 stainless steel, unless otherwise noted. Bleed screw in upper housing.\n11 Fill Fluid: As noted. Factory filled and assembled when possible.\n12 Process Connections:\n13 Instrument: 1/2-inch female NPT, unless otherwise noted.\n14 Process: 1/2-inch female NPT, unless otherwise noted.\n15 Connection Material: Compatible with pressure indicator and process lines.\n16 Manufacturers:\n17 Ametek, Mansfield and Green Division; Type SG.\n18 Ashcroft; Type 101.\n19 Ashcroft; Type 741.\n20 S27 Indicator, Digital Panel:\n21 General:\n22 Function: Display analog signal, or totalize analog signal, and display engineering units.\n23 Type: 7-segment digital, horizontal edgewise.\n24 Performance:\n25 Range: As noted, engineering units as noted.\n26 Accuracy:\n27 Plus or minus 0.1 percent full scale.\n28 Temperature, Operating: 32 to 120 degrees F.\n29 Features:\n30 Digits: 4-1/2; 0.56-inch high minimum; 7-segment LED, gas plasma, or vacuum fluorescent.\n31 Decimal Point: Field selectable.\n32 Input Impedance: 100 ohms maximum.\n33 Service Legend: Permanent, display of engineering units.\n34 Response Time: I second maximum to 0.1 percent accuracy.\n35 Signal Interface: 4 to 20 mA dc.\nAppendix 4D.229\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Enclosure:\n2 Type: NEMA 4X.\n3 Mounting: Panel; approximately 2-inch high, 4-inch wide, 5-inch deep.\n4 Power: 120V ac, 50/60-Hz unless otherwise noted.\n5 Manufacturers:\n6 Red Lum Controls.\n7 Action Instruments.\n8 Analogic.\n9 Moore Industries.\n10 T3 Temperature Element and Transmitter, Resistance:\n11 General:\n12 Function: Measure the temperature of ambient, and transmit analog signal proportional to temperature.\n13 Type: RTD.\n14 Parts: Element and transmitter.\n15 Service:\n16 Process: As noted.\n17 Process Temperature Range: As noted.\n18 Element:\n19 Type:\n20 Single-element, unless otherwise noted\n21 Three-wire, RTD.\n22 Platinum, 100 ohm nominal at 0 degrees C.\n23 Performance:\n24 Accuracy: Greater of plus or minus 4 degrees F or plus or minus 0.75 percent of reading.\n25 Features:\n26 Dimensions:\n27 1/4-inch diameter.\n28 Length to accommodate thermowell insertion and extension lengths.\n29 Spring-loaded element when well is used.\n30 Sheath: Type 316 Stainless Steel, unless otherwise noted.\n31 Process Operating Temperature Range: Minus 320 to 900 degrees F, unless otherwise noted.\n32 Terminal Connection Head: General purpose, NEMA 4 weatherproof, unless otherwise noted.\n33 Maximum Temperature: 220 degrees F, unless otherwise noted.\n34 Thermowell Connection: Union Coupler, unless otherwise noted.\n35 Sensitive Length: 1.6 inch minimum, measured from closed end.\n36 Transmitter:\nAppendix 4D.230\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Ambient Operation Conditions.\n2 Temperature: minus 40 to 140 degrees F, with display.\n3 Relative Humidity: 0 to 100 percent, noncondensing.\n4 Type: Two-wire, powered by a remote power supply.\n5 Performance:\n6 Accuracy: Greater of plus or minus 0.7 degree F or plus or minus 0.06 percent of span.\n7 Response Time: 1.2 second 90 percent response time for 80 percent input step, with minimum damping.\n8 Electrical Safety: Standard unless otherwise noted.\n9 Features:\n10 Indicator:\n11 Three line LCD, unless otherwise noted.\n12 Automatic reference junction compensation.\n13 Failsafe Mode:\n14 User configurable ON, unless otherwise noted.\n15 Downscale, unless otherwise noted.\n16 Electric Damping: 1.2 seconds.\n17 Signal Interface: 4 to 20 mA dc\n18 Power: 24V dc external power supply.\n19 Digital Communication: HART.\n20 One HART communicator to be supplied for all HART capable transmitters, if not already supplied under\n21 another Specification section.\n22 Enclosure:\n23 Materials: Epoxy coated, low-copper aluminum, unless otherwise noted.\n24 Type: NEMA 4X.\n25 Mounting:\n26 Wall, as noted.\n27 For wall, provide stainless steel mounting set, unless otherwise noted.\n28 Manufacturers and Products:\n29 Foxboro; RTT20 Series Transmitter with PR Series RTD and Thermowell.\n30 Rosemount; 78 Series Platinum RTD and Model 644H Transmitter.\n31 Y40 Uninterruptible Power Supply System:\n32 General:\n33 Function: Provides isolated, regulated uninterrupted ac output power during a complete or partial\n34 interruption of incoming line power.\n35 Major Parts: Inverter, a battery charger, sealed battery.\n36 Performance:\n37 Capacity: As noted.\nAppendix 4D.231\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Input Power: 120V ac single-phase/60 Hz, unless otherwise noted.\n2 Connections: As noted.\n3 Output Power: 120V ac single-phase/60 Hz, unless otherwise noted.\n4 Connections: As noted.\n5 On-line Efficiency: 85 percent minimum, unless otherwise noted.\n6 Backup Runtime:\n7 Full Load: 9 minutes minimum, unless otherwise noted.\n8 Half Load:\n9 24 minutes minimum, unless otherwise noted.\n10 Continuous no-break power with no measurable transfer time.\n11 Sine-Wave Output Power Regulation:\n12 Plus or minus 5 percent or less total harmonic distortion.\n13 Meet or exceed CSA C22.2 No. 107.1 for harmonic distortion.\n14 Voltage Regulation: Plus or minus 3 percent nominal.\n15 Operating Temperature: 0 to 40 degrees C (32 to 104 degrees F).\n16 Lightning and Surge Protection:\n17 Pass lightning standard ANSI/IEEE C62.41 Categories A and B test.\n18 2000 to I attenuation of input spike.\n19 Isolation:\n20 True separately derived power source as per NEC Article 250-5d with output neutral bonded to\n21 ground.\n22 Complete from line.\n23 Less than 2 pF effective input to output capacitance.\n24 Features:\n25 Enclosure:\n26 Floor mounted cabinet, unless otherwise noted.\n27 RS232 external interface with full-duplex output capable of:\n28 Remote monitoring of meter functions and alarm conditions.\n29 Remote diagnostic testing.\n30 Remotely set point display and adjustment.\n31 Manufacturers:\n32 Best Power, FERRUPS Uninterruptible Power System.\n33 Controlled Power.\n34 American Power Conversion; Back-UPS Pro.\n35 Y50 Programmable Logic Controller and Operator Interface Unit System:\n36 General:\n37 Function: Microprocessor based system configured, assembled, and programmed in order to implement\n38 the safe automatic control and measurement of process control equipment.\nAppendix 4D.232\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 System incorporates programmable logic controllers, processors, power supplies, operator interface units,\n2 communication hardware, programming and development software, and cables, and programming laptop.\n3 Programmable Logic Controller (PLC):\n4 Function: Used for process monitoring and control by emulating functions of conventional panel\n5 mounted equipment such as relays, timers, counters, current switches, calculation modules, PID\n6 controllers, stepping switches, and drum programmers.\n7 PLC Parts: Central processing unit (CPU), power supply, local input/output modules, local\n8 (chassis/rack) controllers, 11O terminals board and termination cable assemblies, and factory assembled\n9 programming laptop, ETHERNET and OIU communication interconnecting cables.\n10 PLC Central Processing Unit (CPU) Specifications:\n11 Type: Microprocessor, 16-bit minimum.\n12 Memory: 32K words.\n13 1/0 Capacity: 4096 inputs, 4096 outputs.\n14 Standard RAM with lithium battery for 2 years backup.\n15 Scan Time: 0.9 ms/1K ladder logic.\n16 Communications:\n17 Two communication ports, RS-232/RS485 and 1OBASE-T Ethernet channel.\n18 10 Mbps communications -TCP/IP protocol.\n19 RS-232 and DH-485 Communication protocols.\n20 Instruction Set: Timers and Counters.\n21 Math: Signed integer and floating-point math including add, subtract, multiply, divide, square root,\n22 exponent, and compare.\n23 Register Operations: Shift registers, bit shift, bit set, bit clear, data move and data format conversion.\n24 Process Loop Control: User configurable direct or reverse acting PID loop control computation with the\n25 capability of both AUTO and MANUAL modes of operation, remote access to controller tuning\n26 constants.\n27 Real Time Clock: Date and time set and compare.\n28 Miscellaneous: Jump or skip to a label, one shot, quantity drums, pre-configured analog alarm functions,\n29 subroutines, quantity.\n30 Environment:\n31 Operating Temperature: 0 to 55 degrees C (32 to 131 degrees F).\n32 Storage Temperature: -25 to 70 degree C (-13 to 158 degrees F).\n33 Relative Humidity: (noncondensing) 5 to 95 percent at 0 to 55 degrees C (32 to 131 degrees F).\n34 Heat Dissipation: 15 Watts.\n35 Agency Approvals and Standards:\n36 UL listed.\n37 CSA certified.\n38 or another state approved agency.\nAppendix 4D.233\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Random Access Memory (RAM):\n2 Type: CMOS type.\n3 Word Size: 16 bits, minimum.\n4 Battery Backup: 24 months, minimum.\n5 Memory Size: Sufficient to implement all applications software plus 50 percent spare.\n6 Read only memory (ROM) for controller's operating system and diagnostics.\n7 Memory Protection: Keylock switch.\n8 Manufacture and Product: Allen-Bradley 1747-1552.\n9 PLC Power Supply: One unit for each input/output base assembly.\n10 Voltage: 120/220 volts (user selectable), 60 Hz input; 24 VDC output.\n11 Mounting: Integral with PLC chassis.\n12 Manufacture and Product: Allen-Bradley 1747-P4.\n13 PLC Input/Output: Complete input/output system specifications:\n14 Discrete Input Modules:\n15 Voltage: 24 VDC.\n16 Operating Power: 2 watts.\n17 Points per Module: 16 maximum.\n18 LED status indicator for each point.\n19 Isolation: Between input point and PLC, 1,500 volts rms.\n20 Discrete Output Modules:\n21 Voltage: 24VDC.\n22 Operating Power: 2 watts.\n23 Load Rating: 2 amps continuous.\n24 Isolation: Between PLC and output point, 1,500 volts rms.\n25 Points per Module: 16 maximum.\n26 LED status indicator for each point.\n27 Isolated Discrete Output Modules:\n28 Type: Isolated Form C relay.\n29 Voltage: 120 volts, 60-Hz.\n30 Isolated Outputs per Module: 8 Maximum.\n31 Load Rating: 2 amps continuous.\n32 Operating Power: 2.5 watts.\n33 LED status indicator and fuse for each point.\n34 Analog Input and Output Modules:\n35 Voltage: 24 volts dc.\nAppendix 4D.234\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Power: 3 watts.\n2 Differential Analog Points Per Module: 8 maximum.\n3 Isolated Analog Output Points Per Module: 8 maximum.\n4 Isolation: Between PLC and 1/0 point and between 1/0 points, 1,500 volts rms.\n5 Analog Input Resolution: 12 bits minimum.\n6 Analog Output Resolution: 12 bits minimum.\n7 Manufacturer and Series: Allen-Bradley 1746 Series.\n8 Operator Interface Unit:\n9 Function: Panel mounted terminal unit with color video display screen and keypad, which enable an\n10 operator to monitor and interface with the process control system programmable logic controller. OIU\n11 linked with PLC over ETHERNET network.\n12 Type: Microprocessor based device and programmable using Microsoft Windows based development\n13 software. (Note: PICS PLC and OIU design is based upon the Allen-Bradley SLC-5/05E programmable\n14 logic controller and the Allen-Bradley Panelview 600 operator interface unit).\n15 Parts: Central processing unit (CPU), power supply, video display touch screen, keypad, Ethernet and\n16 printer ports.\n17 Specifications:\n18 Electrical: DC Power Supply Limits: 85 to 264 VAC AC Power, Power Consumption 60 VA maximum.\n19 Mechanical: Enclosure NEMA Type 12/13, 4X (Indoor use only), LED Indicators -\"Green\" COMM,\n20 \"Red\" FAULT.\n21 Display: Active Matrix Thin Film resistor (TFT) with cold cathode fluorescent (CCF) backlight.\n22 Size: 4.54 x 3.4 in.\n23 Pixels: 320 x 234.\n24 Touch Cells: 128 (16 columns x 8 rows).\n25 Touch Cell Size: (20 x 29 pixels).\n26 Terminal Memory: total application flash memory 240K bytes (application screens)\n27 Environment:\n28 Operating Temperature: -0 to 55 degrees C (32 to 131 degrees F).\n29 Storage Temperature: -25 to 70 degrees C (-13 to 158 degrees F).\n30 Relative Humidity: (noncondensing) 5 to 95 percent at 0 to 55 degrees C (32 to 131 degrees F).\n31 Heat Dissipation: 32 Watts.\n32 Agency Approvals and Standards: UL, CSA certified, or another state approved agency.\n33 Manufacturer and Model: Panelview600 or equal.\n34 Software Packages:\n35 PLC Programming: Microsoft Windows based RSLogix500 programming and communication\n36 software (RSLinx) with master disk, most recent revisions, and 2-year support.\n37 OIU Programming: Microsoft Windows based Panelbuilder32 development software with master disk,\n38 most recent revisions, and 2-year support.\nAppendix 4D.235\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Ethernet Switch:\n2 Function: Mixed Media 10/100 Base T 8 port modular fiber switch with 4 port fiber module and 4 port\n3 RJ45 dual speed module.\n4 Specifications: Address Table 24K nodes with address aging.\n5 Cooling Method: Internal 9-CFM fan.\n6 Filtering and Forwarding Rate: 16-port aggregate, 2380K packets per second.\n7 Latency, 100 Mbps: 5 jts + packet time; 10 Mbps: 15 [is + packet time, Packet Buffers 8 MB dynamic.\n8 Processing Type: Store and forward with IEEE 802.3x full-duplex flow control\n9 Standards: IEEE 802.3: 1OBASE-T, 1OBASE-FL; IEEE 802.3u: IOOBASE-TX, 100BASE-FX.\n10 Connectors:\n11 LE1401A, (1) power.\n12 LEI419C: (4) pairs of SC.\n13 LE1425C: (4) RJ-45.\n14 Indicators Chassis: Power; Per port: LK: ON when link is operational; Act: ON with port activity;\n15 FDX/HDX: ON for full-duplex mode, OFF for half-duplex mode; 100/10: ON for 100 Mbps, OFF for 10\n16 Mbps\n17 Power Input: 110-240 VAC, 47--63 Hz, internal, autosensing; 20 W.\n18 Size: 1.75 inches high (I U) by 17 inches wide by 9 inches deep (4.4 x 43.2 x 22.9 cm); weight:\n19 2.5 pounds (1.1 kg).\n20 Agency Approvals and Standards: UL, CSA or another state approved agency.\n21 Manufacturer and Product: Black Box LE1401A; or equal.\n22 Programming Notebook (Laptop) Computer:\n23 Function: Notebook computer used to implement, test, and store all PLC and OIU application software\n24 programming. Install and configure all PLC and OIU vendor software packages and licenses onto laptop.\n25 Complete and save application software to notebook computer and to backup R/W CD(s).\n26 Specifications:\n27 Processor 2650: Intel Pentium 4-M processor at 2.0 GHz, 512 KB cache.\n28 Memory: 128 MB DDR SDRAM standard, upgradable to 512 MB maximum, SDRAM configurations\n29 include one of 128, 192, 256, 384 or 512 MB.\n30 1/0 Ports:\n31 25-hole pin parallel connector.\n32 15-pin monitor connector.\n33 6-pin PS/2-style keyboard, mouse, and keypad.\n34 2-USB (Universal Serial Bus) compliant 4-pin connectors.\n35 RJ- I1 connector for modem.\n36 RJ-45 connector for connection to Ethernet multimedia switch.\n37 Chassis:\n38 14.1-inch XGA Display: Height: 36 mm (1.42-inch); width: 328 mm (12.9-inch); depth: 275 mm (10.8-\n39 inch); weight: 7.25 lbs. with CD, floppy and battery.\nAppendix 4D.236\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Display: Displays 15-inch SXGA+ TFT active-matrix display with 1400 x 1050 resolution; height: 38\n2 mm (1.5-inch); width: 332 mm (13.1-inch); depth: 275 mm (10.8-inch).\n3 Power: Lithium Ion battery, AC Adapter: Input voltage: 90 to 135 VAC and 164 to 264 VAC.\n4 Slots: Connectors: (1) Type I or Type II card, 3.3 and 5 V cards supported, Warm-swap Capable.\n5 Graphics: 16MB DDR 4X AGP NVIDIA@ GeForce2TM.\n6 Storage: 20 GB4 Ultra ATA hard drive.\n7 Optical Devices:\n8 Fixed Bay integrated in left side with CD-RW: 24x/lOx/24x max.\n9 Removable Media: Fixed Floppy drive standard.\n10 Communication Devices: Network Interface Cards, Integrated 10/100 network interface card.\n11 Modems: Standard: Internal 56K5 capable v.92 Fax modem.\n12 Software & Accessories: Microsoft® Windows® 2000 or XP Professional Small Business most recent\n13 version. Insure compatibility between platform and vendor software packages prior to installation.\n14 Utilities: Norton AntiVirusTM 2003, introductory version.\n15 Manufacturer and Model: Dell Inspiron 2650 or equal.\n16 Y51 AutoDialer:\n17 General:\n18 Function: The Auto-dialer shall be a solid state component capable of bidirectional communication with\n19 the PLC network via cellular phone.\n20 Environmental:\n21 Operating Temperature Range: Minus 60C to 54'C.\n22 Relative Humidity: 0 to 95%, noncondensing.\n23 Case: Suitable for mounting inside panel enclosure.\n24 Features:\n25 System Security: Access protected by security codes.\n26 Alarm Monitoring: Continuously monitors all IDF alarms.\n27 Remote Data-Table Access: Monitor or alter any data table location on demand via front panel or\n28 telephone.\n29 Protocol: Allen-Bradley Dl.\n30 Latency:\n31 01-10 seconds.\n32 Rotary pulse or tone dialing, keyboard selectable.\n33 Dial up to 16 different numbers, each up to 60 digits long.\n34 FCC Registered Part 68, \"Ringer Equivalence\": 0.3A.\n35 Alarm Acknowledgment shall be Touch-Tone key or by calling back.\n36 Autodialer shall be compatible with most cellular telephone systems.\n37 Provide Serial Cable for use with AB SLC.\n38 Autocall Test.\nAppendix 4D.237\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Nonvolatile Program Memory Retention.\n2 Local Data Logging.\n3 Primary Power:\n4 Voltage: 120 VAC, 50/60 Hz\n5 Standby Supply Current: 300mA.\n6 Operational Supply Current: 460mA.\n7 Battery backup: The product is to contain its own gel cell rechargeable battery, which is automatically\n8 kept charged when AC power is present. The system shall operate on battery power for a minimum of 13\n9 continuous hours in the event of AC power failure.\n10 Surge protection: All power, phone line, dry contact, and analog signal inputs shall be protected at the\n11 circuit board to IEEE Standard 587, category B (6,000 volts open circuit/3,000 amps closed circuit).\n12 Diagnostics:\n13 The unit shall include user commands to execute diagnostics of the PLC network to determine the\n14 health of the network. The unit shall inform the user of the length of scan time for the set of all\n15 configured remote channels.\n16 AC Power failure.\n17 Remote (PLC) Channel Monitoring: failure of the active serial communications channels.\n18 Input Monitoring: with configurable aux contacts.\n19 Warranty: The autodialer shall be covered by not less than a two (2) year warranty covering parts and\n20 labor performed at the Factory.\n21 Agency Approvals: FCC Part 68.\n22 Manufacturer and Product: RACO Verbatim Gateway Alarm Dialer or equivalent.\n23 Y52 Cellular Modem (CDMA):\n24 General:\n25 Function: The Fixed Wireless Terminal shall provide wireless connectivity for standard telephone\n26 equipment.\n27 Environmental:\n28 Operating temperature range: -100C to +500C.\n29 Storage temperature range: -400C to + 600C.\n30 Relative Humidity: 5% to 95%.\n31 Case: Suitable for mounting inside panel enclosure.\n32 Features:\n33 Compatible with popular supplementary services including caller ID, call waiting, 3-way calling, and\n34 call forwarding.\n35 Single jack or dual jack for voice and fax operation.\n36 PSTN Emulation.\n37 Support up to five phones (5 REN).\n38 Emergency battery backup.\n39 Automatic end-of-dialing (no SEND key).\nAppendix 4D.238\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 LED Indicators: shall include power/battery status, signal status, message status, and ON/OFF hook\n2 status.\n3 Primary Air Interface Standard:\n4 TIA/EIA/IS-2000A.\n5 Primary Transmit Power:\n6 200 mW (23dBm).\n7 Frequency Ranges: Transmit/Receive:\n8 CDMA800 824-849 MHz 869-894 MHz.\n9 PCS (CDMA) 1900 1850-1910 MHz 1930-1990 MHz.\n10 Primary Power:\n11 Voltage: 110 -230 VAC, 50/60 Hz.\n12 Battery backup: One (1) 6-volt, 4 AH lead acid rechargeable battery.\n13 Connectors:\n14 Two RJ-1 1 interface jacks for telephone, Group 3 analog fax, or analog data.\n15 TNC antenna connector (50 ohms).\n16 Antennae:\n17 Gain: 8.0 dBi minimum\n18 Frequency Bands: 824 -1000 and 1700 -2000 MHz.\n19 VSWR: Transmit sub-bands < 1.5:1, Receive sub-bands < 2.0:1.\n20 Front to Back Ratio: (F/B Ratio) > 16 dB (nom).\n21 Feed power handling: 10 W.\n22 Nominal input impedance: 50 Ohms.\n23 Connector: TNC male on short coax (30 -50 cm).\n24 Polarization: Linear (vertical when clamped to vertical pole).\n25 Mounting: Pole mount, maximum diameter: 50 mm (2\").\n26 Model Number: HGD-0 \"High Gain Log Periodic Dipole Array\".\n27 Warranty: The Cellular modem shall be covered not less than a fifteen (15) month warranty covering\n28 parts and labor performed at the Factory.\n29 Agency Approvals:\n30 FCC Part 15/Part 22/Part 24 Class B Compliance.\n31 Manufacturer and Product: Phonecell@) SX4E CDMA or approved equivalent.\n32 Y178A Programmable Data Logger, Integral Solar Powered:\n33 General:\n34 Function: Programmable data logger and system capable of interfacing with process measurements loop\n35 powered analog device(s) for the purpose of measuring, collecting, storing and serially transferring\n36 process level data with externally connected programming and storage device (i.e. laptop computer).\n37 Type: Microprocessor based.\nAppendix 4D.239\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Parts: Data logger, input/output channel, signal converter, communications, rechargeable battery, solar\n2 panel, charge controller, enclosure, and programming and data retrieval software. Vendor shall provide\n3 complete system meeting the intent of these specifications and contract drawings.\n4 Service: Interface with Level/Element Transmitter, Submersible, Wastewater (Reference Section 13401\n5 PICS Component L42 for detail information, Druck PTX 1830 and STE1 10 Level Element/Transmitter\n6 Submersible 12 V dc compatible or equal).\n7 Performance:\n8 Environmental:\n9 Operating Temperature: Minus 67 degrees F to plus 185 degrees F (minus 25 to plus 85 degrees C),\n10 with gel cell battery, minus 40 degrees F to plus 140 degrees F (minus 40 to plus 60 degrees C).\n11 Relative Humidity: 5 to 95 percent, non-condensing.\n12 Central Processing Unit (CPU):\n13 Processor: Hitachi 6303.\n14 Memory:\n15 Table based memory structure 62,000 data points.\n16 Real time clock.\n17 Diagnostic LEDs.\n18 12-bit A/D converter.\n19 16kB active program.\n20 128kB operating and flash final storage.\n21 Comm Port: 9-pin D type connector for RS232 interface with PC; up to 9600 baud selectable baud rates.\n22 Manufacturer and Model: Campbell Scientific; CR510 Series with extended temperature test.\n23 Input/Output Channel:\n24 Analog Inputs:\n25 Two (2) differential or four (4) single ended configured.\n26 Range: 0 to 2.5 V dc.\n27 Accuracy: +/-0.25 percent.\n28 Resolution: 0.33 uV.\n29 Sample Rates: 2.72 ms adjustable.\n30 Manufacturer and Model: Campbell Scientific; Model CR510.\n31 Terminal Input Channel Converter:\n32 Convert 4-2OmA to datalogger input range of 0 to 2.5V dc.\n33 Shunt Resistor: 100 ohms.\n34 Tolerance: +/- 0.01 percent.\n35 Power: 0.25 watt.\n36 Manufacturer and Model: Campbell Scientific; Model CURS100.\n37 DC Power Supply:\n38 Solar Panel, Regulator and Mounts:\nAppendix 4D.240\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Solar panel converting sunlight to DC power.\n2 Voltage Peak: 16.8 volts.\n3 Current at Peak, amps: 1.19 amps.\n4 Peak Power: 20 watts.\n5 Manufacturer and Model: Campbell Scientific; Model MSX20R.\n6 Rechargeable Power Supply with Batteries:\n7 Rechargeable power supply capable of recharging batteries from solar power.\n8 Sealed rechargeable batteries providing 7.0 AHRS nominal output at 68 degrees F (20 degrees C).\n9 Float charged by solar panel.\n10 Manufacturer and Model: Campbell Scientific; Model PS100.\n11 Enclosure: NEMA 4X -fiberglass reinforced polyester (FRP) 16 inches wide by 18 inches high by\n12 9 inches deep (minimum) sized to accommodate datalogger, input/output channels, DC power supply, and\n13 sensor terminations.\n14 Enclosure Mounting: Wall or pipe mounting as required.\n15 Power Requirements: 5.4V dc to 16V dc.\n16 Software Language: Pakbus operating system, and Microsoft@ Windows@ 2000 or XP based\n17 Datalogger Support and editing software and licenses complete and latest versions.\n18 Support: Two (2) eight-hour days in support of installation, startup, calibration, and testing of complete\n19 system.\n20 Training: One (1) eight-hour day in support of Tank Farm Contractor training on operations, setup, data\n21 retrieval, and troubleshooting of complete system.\n22 Warranty: Three (3) years complete system beginning after system installation is complete and tested.\n23 Manufacturer: Campbell Scientific.\n24\nAppendix 4D.241\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTypical\nTag I Tag 2 Tag 2 Tag4 Engineering Voltage/ Wiring\nItem Rev Area Process ISA Loop Description P&ID Units Current Address Diagram Notes\nLeachate Collection\n1 1 219(Y) LH FIT 203 and Removal System heet8I0of4 GPM 4-20mA 1:01/00 No. I\nHigh Flow Pump Flow\nLeachate Collection H2805\n2 1 219(Y) LH FIT 202 and Removal System heet8I0of4 GPM 4-2OmA 1:01/01 No. 1\nLow Flow Pump Flow\n3 1Leak Detection H-2-830854 GPM 4-2OmA 1:01/02 No. 1System Pump Flow Sheet I of 4\nLeachate Collection H-2-830854\n4 1 219(Y) LH LT 101 and Removal System SheetInches 4-2mA 1:01/03 No. 2\nLevel\n5 1 219(Y) LH LT 104 Leak Detection H-2-830854 Inches 4-2OmA 1:01/04 No. 2System Level Sheet 1 of 4\n6 1 219(Y) LH TIT 219 Crest Pad Building H-2-830854 Fahrenheit 4-2OmA 1:01/05 No. 3Temperature Sheet 1 of 4\n219(Y)2 Leachate Storage Tank H-2-830854 No. 2/ Add7 1 LH LT 301 Level Sheet 1 of 4 Inches 4-2OmA 1:01/06 No. 6 Signal\nIsolator\nLeachate Transfer H-2-830854 No. 1/ Add8 1 219(Y)1 LH FIT 302 Pump Discharge Flow Sheet 1 of 4 Signal\nIsolator\n9Leachate Transfer H-2-830854 Fahrenheit 4-2OmA 1:02/00 No. 3Building Temperature Sheet ] of 4\nWire in\n10 1 219(Y) LH Spare Input 4-2OmA 1:02/01 spare\ninputs\nWire in\n11 1 219(Y) LH Spare Input 4-2OmA 1:02/02 spare\ninputs\nWire in\nspare12 1 219(Y) LH Spare Input 4-2OmA 1:02/03 inputs\nAppendix 4D.242\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTypical\nTag I Tag 2 Tag 2 Tag4 Engineering Voltage! Wiring\nItem Rev Area Process ISA Loop Description P&ID Units Current Address Diagram Notes\nWire in\n13 1 219(Y) LH Spare Input 4-20mA 1:02/04 spare\ninputs\nWire in\n14 1 219(Y) LH Spare Input 4-2OmA 1:02/05 spare\ninputs\nWire in\n15 1 219(Y) LH Spare Input 4-2OmA 1:02/06 spare\ninputs\nWire in\n16 1 219(Y) LH Spare Input 4-2OmA 1:02/07 spare\ninputs\nLeachate Collection\n17 1 219(Y) LH HS 203 and Removal System H-2-830854 On/Off/Auto 24V dc 1:03/00 No. 4High Flow Pump Auto Sheet I of 4\nStatus\nLeachate Collection\n18 1 219(Y) LH YL 203 and Removal System H-2-830854 On/Off 24V dc 1:03/01 No. 4High Flow Pump On Sheet I of 4\nStatus\nLeachate Collection\n19 1 219(Y) LH HS 202 and Removal System H-2-830854 On/Off/Auto 24V dc 1:03/02 No. 4Low Flow Pump Auto Sheet 1 of 4\nStatus\nLeachate Collection\n20 1 219(Y) LH YL 202 and Removal System H-2-830854 On/Off 24V dc 1:03/03 No. 4Low Flow Pump On Sheet I of 4\nStatus\nLeak Detection H-2-830854\n21 1 219(Y) LH HS 204 System Pump Auto Sheet 1 of 4 On/Off/Auto 24V de 1:03/04 No. 4\nStatus\nLeak Detection H-2-830854\n22 1 219(Y) LH YL 204 System Pump On Sheet I of 4 On/Off 24V de 1:03/05 No. 4\nStatus\nAppendix 4D.243\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTypical\nTag 1 Tag 2 Tag 2 Tag4 Engineering Voltage! Wiring\nItem Rev Area Process ISA Loop Description P&ID Units Current Address Diagram Notes\n23 1 219(Y) LH LSH 105 Crest Pad Building H-2-830854:03/06 No. 4Sump Level High Sheet I of 4\nCrest Pad Building H-2-830854 High-High\n24 1 219(Y) LH LSHH 105 Sump Level High Sheet I of 4 Normal:03/07 No.4\nHigh\n25 1 219(Y) LH LSL 105 Crest Pad Building H-2-830854 Low/Normal 24V dc 1:03/08 No. 4Sump Level Low Sheet I of 4\n26 1 219(Y) LH LDE 105 Crest Pad Building H-2-830854 Leak/Normal 24V dc 1:03/09 No. 4Sump Leak Detector Sheet I of 4\n27 1 219(Y) LH JSH 219 Crest Pad Building H-2-830854 Normal/Fail 24V dc 1:03/10 No. 4Power Status Sheet I of 4\nCrest Pad Building H-2-830854\n28 1 219(Y) LH HS 205 Sump Pump Auto Sheet 1 of 4 On/Off/Auto 24V de 1:03/11 No. 4\nStatus\n29 1 219(Y) LH YL 205 Crest Pad Building H-2-830854 On/Off 24V dc 1:03/12 No. 4Sump Pump On Status Sheet I of 4\nCrest Pad Building H-2-830854 Acknowledge/30 1 219(Y) LH HS 219 General Alarm Sheet 1 of 4 Off 24V dc I:03/13 No. 4\nAcknowledge Status\nWire inH-2-830854Wien\n31 1 219(Y) LH Spare Sheet I of 4 24V dc 1:03/14 No. 4 spare\ninputs\nWire inH-2-830854Wien32 1 219(Y) LH Spare Sheet 1 of 4 24V dc 1:03/15 No. 4 spare\ninputs\nWire inH-2-830854Wien\n33 1 219(Y) LH Spare Sheet 1 of 4 24V dc 1:04/00 No. 4 spare\ninputs\n34 1 219(Y)2 LH LSHH 301 Leachate Storage Tank H-2-830854 High 24V dc 1:04/01 No.4\n01 Level Switch Sheet 2 of 4 High/Normal\n35 1 219(Y)2 LH LSLL 301 Leachate Storage Tank H-2-830854 Low Low 24V dc 1:04/02 No. 4\n01 Level Switch Sheet 2 of 4 /Normal\nAppendix 4D.244\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTypical\nTag 1 Tag 2 Tag 2 Tag4 Engineering Voltage/ Wiring\nItem Rev Area Process ISA Loop Description P&ID Units Current Address Diagram Notes\nWire in\n36 1 219(Y) LH Spare 24V dc 1:04/12 No. 4 spare\ninputs\nLeachate Transfer H-2-83085437 1 219(Y)1 LH YL 302-2 Pump Ons He2of84 On/Off 24V dc 1:04/04 No. 4Pump On Status Sheet 2 of 4\nCombined Sump H-2-830854 High38 1 219(Y) LH LSHH 107 Leve Sc He2of84 High 24V dc 1:04/05 No. 4Level Switch Sheet 2 of 4 High/Normal\n39 1 219(Y) LH LSH 107 Combined Sump H-2-830854 High /Normal 24V dc 1:04/06 No. 4Level Switch Sheet 2 of 4\n40 1 219(Y) LH LSL 107 Combined Sump H-2-830854 Low/Normal 24V dc 1:04/07 No. 4Level Switch Sheet 2 of 4\n41 1 219(Y) LH LSLL 107 Combined Sump H-2-830854 Low 24V dc 1:04/08 No. 4Level Switch Sheet 2 of 4 Low/Normal\n42 1 219(Y) LH LDE 107 Combined Sump Leak H-2-830854 Leak/Normal 24V dc 1:04/09 No. 4Detector Sheet 2 of 4\n43 1 219(Y) LH HS 207 Combined Sump H-2-830854 On/OfflAuto 24V dc 1:04/10 No. 4Pump Auto Status Sheet 2 of 4\n44 1 219(Y) LH YL 207 Combined Sump H-2-830854 On/Off 24V dc 1:04/11 No. 4Pump On Status Sheet 2 of 4\nWire in\n45 1 219(Y) LH Spare 24V dc 1:04/12 No. 4 spare\ninputs\nWire in\n46 1 219(Y) LH Spare 24V dc 1:04/13 No. 4 spare\ninputs\nWire in\n47 1 219(Y) LH Spare 24V dc 1:04/14 No. 4 spare\ninputs\nWire in\nspare\n48 1 219(Y) LH Spare 24V dc 1:04/15 No. 4 inputs\nAppendix 4D.245\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTypical\nTag 1 Tag 2 Tag 2 Tag4 Engineering Voltagel Wiring\nItem Rev Area Process ISA Loop Description P&ID Units Current Address Diagram Notes\nLeachate Collection Note:\n49 and Removal System H-2-830854 Start/Stop 120 Vac 0:05/00 No. 4 InterlockHigh Flow Pump Start Sheet I of 4 Control\nCommand\nLeachate Collection Note:\nand Removal System H-2-83085450 1 219(Y) LH YS 202 Low F l S heet 1-of84 Start/Stop 120 Vac 0:05/01 No. 4 InterlockLow Flow Pump Start Sheet 1 of 4Cotl\nCommand\nLeak Detection Note:\n51 1 219(Y) LH YS 204 System Pump Start Sheet I of 4 Start/Stop 120 Vac 0:05/02 No. 4 Interlock\nCommand Control\n52 1 219(Y) LH YS 219 Crest Pad Building H-2-830854 Normal/Fail 120 Vac 0:05/03 No. 5General Alarm Sheet I of 4\nCrest Pad Building Note:\n53 1 219(Y) LH YS 205 Sump Pump Start Sheet I of 4 Start/Stop 120 Vac 0:05/04 No. 4 Interlock\nCommand Control\nCombined Sump H-2-830854 Note:\n54 1 219(Y) LH YS 207 Pump Start Command Sheet 2 of 4 Start/Stop 120 Vac 0:05/05 No. 4 Interlock\nControl\nLeachate Transfer H-2-830854 Note:\n55 1 219(Y)1 LH YS 220 Building General Sheet 2 of 4 Normal/Fail 120 Vac 0:05/06 No. 4 Interlock\nAlarm Control\n56 1 219(Y) LH Spare Output 24V dc 0:05/07 No. 5\nWire in\n57 1 219(Y) LH Spare Output 24V dc 0:06/00 No. 4 spare\noutputs\nWire in\n58 1 219(Y) LH Spare Output 24V dc 0:06/01 No. 4 spare\noutputs\nWire in\nspare\n59 1 219(Y) LH Spare Output 24V dc 0:06/02 No. 4 outputs\nAppendix 4D.246\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTypical\nTag 1 Tag 2 Tag 2 Tag4 Engineering Voltagel Wiring\nItem Rev Area Process ISA Loop Description P&ID Units Current Address Diagram Notes\nWire in\n60 1 219(Y) LH Spare Output 24V de 0:06/03 No. 4 spare\noutputs\nWire in\n61 1 219(Y) LH Spare Output 24V de 0:06/04 No. 4 spare\noutputs\nWire in\n62 1 219(Y) LH Spare Output 24V dc 0:06/05 No. 4 spare\noutputs\nWire in\n63 1 219(Y) LH Spare Output 24V de 0:06/06 No. 4 spare\noutputs\nWire in\n64 1 219(Y) LH Spare Output 24V dc 0:06/07 No. 4 spare\noutputs\nHandswitch in\n65 1 219(Y) LH HS 001 Interlock Relay\nCabinet\nIndicator Light in\n66 1 219(Y) LH YL 001 Interlock Relay\nCabinet\n(Y) = A for Cell No. 1. For Cell No. I reference corresponding H-2-830854 sheet 1 of 4 and sheet 2 of 4.\n(Y) = E for Cell No. 2. For Cell No. 2 reference corresponding H-2-830854 sheet 3 of 4 and sheet 4 of 4.\n1\n2\nAppendix 4D.247\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Loop Descriptions\n2 Supplement 4 PLC and OIU Application Software\n3 Document Objectives\n4 This Supplement No. 4 to Specification Section 13401, PROCESS INSTRUMENTATION AND\n5 CONTROL SYSTEMS (PICS) provides the basis for estimating the minimum level of effort required to\n6 implement PLC and OIU application software for Cell No. 1 and Cell No. 2 Integrated Disposal Facilities\n7 (IDF).\n8 Unless otherwise directed by the Tank Farm Contractor during Application Software Submittal and\n9 Design Workshops, this document provides guidelines for the programming and testing of all PLC and\n10 OIU application software. Note: Issues related to Application Software Submittal and Design Workshops\n11 are discussed in Section 13401, PROCESS INSTRUMENTATIONAND CONTROL SYSTEMS (PICS).\n12 This Supplement No. 4 shall be used in conjunction with Contract Documents (drawings and\n13 specifications, and supplements) and relevant PICS supplier technical information and manuals while\n14 developing application software.\n15 PICS Supplements shall be provided to Construction General Contractor in electronic format upon\n16 request.\n17 Reference Management Directive TFC-MD-034, Rev. A, attached to this supplement for directives on\n18 HMI (OIU) configurations.\n19 PLC And OU Program Layout\n20 1. Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) Application Software: Provide PLC application software as\n21 necessary for a fully functional and operable PLC system in accordance with the project design.\n22 PLC programming includes, but shall not be limited to the following:\n23 a. PLC application software development and installation\n24 b. PLC equipment configuration\n25 c. PLC interface with Operator Interface Unit (OIU)\n26 d. System testing\n27 e. PLC application software debugging and trouble-shooting\n28 f. System hardware and software documentation\n29 g. PLC system startup\n30 h. PLC system training.\n31 2. ETHERNET Address: For more information on SLC500 Ethernet Addressing see Allen-Bradley\n32 Quick Start Ethernet SLC500 Processor > Publication 1747-10.4.\n33 a. Host Name: (To be assigned by Tank Farm Contractor)\n34 b. IP Address: (To be assigned by Tank Farm Contractor)\n35 c. Subnet Masking: 255.255.255.0\n36 d. Gateway address: None\n37 3. PLC Memory Allocation: Provide PLC programming and documentation with logical, structured\n38 groupings of PLC memory registers. Allocate memory within each group to allow for 50 percent\n39 spare capacity. Examples of functional groupings shall be:\n40 a. Inputs > 1:01/00\n41 b. Outputs > O:01/00\n42 c. Control Operation Bits > B3:0 through B3: 200\nAppendix 4D.248\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 d. Titners > T4:0 through T4: 100\n2 e. Counter > C5:0 through C5:100\n3 f. Sequencers > R6:0 through R6:100\n4 g. Ethernet Diagnostic Files > N7:00 through N7:50\n5 h. Scaled Analog Inputs > F8:00 through F8:49\n6 i. Process Calculations, Runtime, and Flow Totalization > F8:50 through F8:100\n7 j. Process Set-points, Comparisons, and Scaling Ranges for Analog Inputs > F9:0 through F9:100\n8 k. Reserve for future SCADA Discrete Write Commands to Processor > N10:0 through N10:100\n9 1. Reserve for future SCADA Analog Write Commands from Processor > F 11:0 through Fl 1:100\n10 m. Reserve for future SCADA Discrete Read Status from Processor > N12:0 through N12:100\n11 n. Reserve for future SCADA Analog Read Status from Processor > F 13:0 through F 13:100\n12 0. Reserve for future PID Control Files > MG14:0 or N14:0\n13 p. Reserve for future Messaging > N15\n14 q. Other Diagnostic Files > N16\n15 4. PLC Programming Sub-routines: Divide PLC program into logical sub-routines. Each sub-routine\n16 shall contain the programming for a process or set of equipment. Examples of logical subroutines\n17 include:\n18 a. Ethernet Communication\n19 b. Process flow, level, and temperature signal scaling, totalizing and alarming\n20 c. Landfill leachate collection and removal system pump control\n21 d. Landfill leak detection system pump control\n22 e. Landfill crest pad building sump pump monitoring\n23 f. Landfill crest pad building miscellaneous control\n24 g. Leachate storage tank level measurement and leak detection\n25 h. Leachate collection and transmission line leak detection\n26 i. Leachate transfer pump control and flow totalization\n27 j. Combined sump pump control and leak detection\n28 k. Leachate transfer building miscellaneous control\n29 5. PLC Program Documentation: Each PLC program shall be fully annotated with descriptive\n30 notations that define the functions associated with each program element. Provide the following\n31 minimum level of program documentation.\n32 a. Each program element shall have a descriptive name associated.\n33 b. Each program sub-routine and article associated within a major program shall be proceeded by\n34 a description of the sub-routine and article function.\n35 c. Each major program shall be proceeded by a description of the program and a listing of the\n36 associated program sub-routines and articles.\n37 6. The program documentation shall be developed using the PLC suppliers standard program\n38 documentation software. The PLC program documentation shall also include a complete cross\n39 reference listing of all program elements and their location within each program.\n40 7. Program OIU to enable secured access to process set-points and control modes of operation. OIU\n41 shall be configured with process status display screens, set-point entry, equipment control mode,\n42 equipment runtime, flow totaling, alarm status, and alarm enable/disable screens.\nAppendix 4D.249\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Process set-point and equipment control mode shall be implemented using RETURN ENTRY at\n2 the control panel mounted OIU.\n3 8. Program OIU with three (3) security levels: engineer, operator, and system administrator. Engineer\n4 shall have access to all displays. Operator shall have access to all process status and alarm display\n5 screens but not control mode, alarm enable/disable, and set-point screens. Administrator shall have\n6 access to process status, and alarm enable/disable screens.\n7 9. Configure and link OIU Main Menu, Sub-Menu and Data screens in a logical fashion allowing\n8 Operator(s) to logically move through each process control loop, with the ability to access data\n9 entry set-point and control modes.\n10 10. Program and configure alarm screens for each alarm as described in Section 3.2 PLC Loop\n11 Descriptions of this Supplement. OIU alarm screens shall enable operator(s) to visually identify\n12 and acknowledge all alarm conditions for each process control loop. Alarms shall be\n13 acknowledged at local alarm display ONLY.\n14 11. Program and configure Autodialer for each alarm as described in Section 3.2 PLC Loop\n15 Descriptions of this Supplement. Autodialer alarm options shall enable operator(s) to identify and\n16 acknowledge all alarm conditions for each process control loop. Alarms shall be acknowledged at\n17 Autodialer ONLY.\n18 PLC & OIU Programming\n19 PLC Standard Functions\n20 1. General -PICS shall implement functions for the purpose of program standardization and\n21 minimum PLC application software capability. Functions may not be applicable to every program\n22 control loop or network.\n23 2. PLC Standard Function No. 1 -Equipment Run Timers: For each equipment ON status input,\n24 track the runtime of the associated equipment item. Accumulate equipment runtime in tenths of\n25 hours using retentive timers with no timer reset due to equipment stoppage or power loss. Provide\n26 a command interface to allow reset or adjustment of equipment run time.\n27 3. PLC Standard Function No. 2A -Equipment Failure Detection: Provide for each equipment item\n28 controlled by the PLC for which the PLC receives ON and AUTO or REMOTE status signals.\n29 Monitor for a fail condition when the unit is in the AUTO or REMOTE mode. A failure condition\n30 shall be activated when the unit is commanded by the PLC to run, and the PLC does not receive the\n31 unit's ON status signal after a 10-second delay period. When a failure condition is detected, inhibit\n32 the PLC run command to the unit. Reset the failure condition when the unit is taken out of AUTO\n33 or REMOTE mode.\n34 4. PLC Standard Function No. 2B -Equipment Flow Failure Detection: Provide for each pump\n35 controlled by the PLC for which the PLC receives a PLC receives ON and AUTO or REMOTE,\n36 status and a PUMP DISCHARGE flow signal. Monitor for a fail condition when the unit is in the\n37 AUTO or REMOTE mode. A failure condition shall be activated when the unit is commanded by\n38 the PLC to run, and the PLC does not receive or maintain a positive flow value for a 10-second\n39 delay period. When a failure condition is detected, inhibit the PLC run command to the unit. Reset\n40 the failure condition when the unit is taken out of AUTO or REMOTE mode.\n41 5. PLC Standard Function No. 3 -Analog Signal Scaling: Provide program logic to scale process\n42 analog signals to engineering units that correspond to the calibrated range of the field sensor. Store\n43 the scaled value in a PLC memory register for use in process control programming and for\n44 transmission to the OIU. Program PLC to monitor each analog input and ALARM in the event a\n45 process signal is out of the 4-2OmA range. A process signal out-of-range ALARM condition shall\n46 prevent associated process control from taking place.\nAppendix 4D.250\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Program PLC and OIU such that in the event a process signal is out-of-range, data point on OIU\n2 shall change to color YELLOW enabling personnel to know the data is incorrect.\n3 6. PLC Standard Function No. 4 -Analog alarms: Provide the capability to detect and annunciate\n4 alarms, such as high-high, high, low, and low-low for analog process signals. The PLC shall\n5 continuously compare the scaled process signal to a set-point value stored in PLC register memory.\n6 If the scaled process signal exceeds the alarm set-point, the PLC shall initiate an alarm signal to the\n7 OIU system and to external annunciation equipment as noted in the Process Control Loop\n8 Descriptions. The analog alarm function shall also have the following capabilities:\n9 a. Provide time delays on all alarm set-points. When the PLC detects the scaled process signal\n10 exceeding set-point, initiate the alarm delay timer. At the end of the time delay, activate the\n11 alarm.\n12 b. Unless specified in the Loop Functional Descriptions, all analog alarms shall be self-resetting.\n13 The PLC shall reset the alarm condition when the scaled process signal value is within the set-\n14 point value plus a 2 percent dead band.\n15 c. Where noted in the Loop Functional Descriptions, provide alarm ENABLE/DISABLE program\n16 logic that respond to commands from the OIU. Suppress the activation of alarms when\n17 commanded to the DISABLE mode.\n18 d. Provide program logic to receive, and store in PLC register memory, alarm set-point\n19 commands from the OIU.\n20 7. PLC Standard Function No. 5 -Discrete alarms: Provide adjustable alarm delay timers on all\n21 discrete alarm input signals monitored by the PLC. Upon detection of the alarm condition, the\n22 PLC shall initiate the time delay. At the end of the time period, the PLC shall communicate the\n23 alarm condition to the OIU system and to external annunciation equipment as noted in the Process\n24 Control Loop Descriptions. The discrete alarm function shall also have the following capabilities:\n25 a. Unless specified in the Loop Functional Descriptions, all discrete alarms shall be self-resetting.\n26 The PLC shall reset the alarm condition when the alarm input signal resets.\n27 b. Where noted in the Loop Functional Descriptions, provide alarm ENABLE/DISABLE program\n28 logic that respond to commands from the OIU. Suppress the activation of alarms when\n29 commanded to the DISABLE mode.\n30 8. PLC Standard Function No. 7 -Process Flow Totalizers: For all process flow signals provide\n31 program logic in the PLC to accumulate flow totals and flow total RESET. The totaled value\n32 stored in the PLC shall be transmitted to the OIU for display and historical logging. PLC shall\n33 increment flow total when pump ON status and minimum flow status is confirmed.\n34 9. PLC Standard Function No. 8 -Pump Restart Time Delay: Provide adjustable delay timers in\n35 PLC program so as to prevent rapid restart of all pumps. An adjustable timer for each pump's\n36 AUTO start control logic, shall begin to countdown once a pump has stopped operating. PLC shall\n37 not execute AUTO start control logic for each pump until respective adjustable delay timer's\n38 accumulated value is equal to preset value of 30 seconds, except for Pumps P-205 and P-207,\n39 which will have a 10-second delay period.\n40 10. PLC Standard Function No. 9 -Power Failure: Program PLC to prevent PLC from executing\n41 process equipment automatic control during a power failure condition.\n42 PLC Loop Descriptions\n43 Note: Loop Descriptions are typical for both Cell No. 1 and Cell No. 2 process equipment.\n44 1. Landfill Leachate Collection and Removal System (Loops 101, 202 and 203). Reference P&ID\n45 Drawing H-2-830854 sheet 1 of 4.\nAppendix 4D.251\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI a. General -Landfill leachate collection and removal system consists of one collection sump,\n2 high and low flow collection pumps, one common level sensor, two flow transmitters, pump\n3 discharge piping, and ancillary valves. Pumps shall extract leachate from landfill collection\n4 and removal system sump and pump leachate to an above grade leachate storage tank via an\n5 underground double walled containment pipe. PLC shall monitor discharge flow from each\n6 pump via flow transmitters installed in each pump's discharge line. PLC shall automatically\n7 compute total extracted leachate from sump. All process variables and equipment status shall\n8 be displayed locally via panel mounted OIU and digital indicators.\n9 b. Program -Program PLC to implement continuous monitoring of liquid levels inside landfill\n10 leachate collection and removal sump and provide automatic operation of high and low flow\n11 pumps. Program PLC to automatically operate pumps ON/OFF based upon liquid levels inside\n12 the landfill leachate collection and removal system sump. PLC shall automatically operate\n13 pumps ON/OFF in order to insure that liquid levels over landfill liner -as measured from the\n14 bottom of the sump -do not exceed 12-inches. The PLC shall be programmed to automatically\n15 turn off the low flow pump when the high flow pump is called to run.\n16 c. AUTO Operation -Automatic operation requires operator(s) place each pump's respective\n17 ON-OFF-AUTO control switch (located at MCC) to AUTO mode. Pump operation and alarm\n18 set-points shall be entered at the control panel mounted OIU. The pumps shall operate between\n19 separate start and stop level set-points.\n20 d. Process Control Set-points -Operator(s) shall enter the following control set-points at the\n21 control panel mounted OIU:\n22 (1) High flow pump start level in inches\n23 (2) Low flow pump start level in inches\n24 (3) High flow pump stop level in inches\n25 (4) Low flow pump stop level in inches\n26 (5) Landfill leachate collection and removal system high-high level alarm in inches\n27 (6) Landfill leachate collection and removal system high level alarm in inches\n28 e. REMOTE Operation -None.\n29 f. ON (manual) Operation -ON operation requires the following steps be taken by operator(s):\n30 (1) Operator(s) shall place high and low flow pump's respective ON-OFF-AUTO control\n31 switch (located at MCC) to ON mode.\n32 g. Interlocks -Interlocks shall prevent operation of leachate collection and removal pumps in\n33 the event of a leachate storage tank high-high level alarm condition, or a leak alarm condition\n34 in either the landfill crest pad building sump, leachate storage tank or combined sump.\n35 h. Alarms -Program PLC to monitor process and alarm for the following minimum conditions:\n36 (1) Landfill leachate collection and removal system high-high level\n37 (2) Landfill leachate collection and removal system high level\n38 (3) Landfill leachate collection and removal system high flow pump fail\n39 (4) Landfill leachate collection and removal system low flow pump fail\n40 (5) Landfill leachate collection and removal system high flow pump flow fail\n41 (6) Landfill leachate collection and removal system low flow pump flow fail\n42 (7) Landfill leachate collection and removal system level signal fail\n43 (8) Landfill leachate collection and removal system high flow pump flow signal fail\n44 (9) Landfill leachate collection and removal system low flow pump flow signal fail\n45 i. Runtime and Flow Totaling -Program PLC to implement runtime and flow totals for each\n46 leachate collection and removal system pump.\nAppendix 4D.252\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 PLC increments equipment runtime and process flows when respective pump ON status and\n2 minimum flow status is confirmed. PLC control logic shall be programmed to allow runtime\n3 and flow value reset and adjustment.\n4 2. Landfill Leak Detection System (Loops 104 and 204). Reference P&ID Drawing H-2-830854 sheet\n5 1 of 4.\n6 a. General -Landfill leak detection system consists of one leak detection sump, collection\n7 pump, one level sensor, flow transmitter, pump discharge piping, and ancillary valves. Leak\n8 detection system pump shall extract leachate from landfill leak detection sump and pump this\n9 leachate to an above grade leachate storage tank via an underground double walled\n10 containment pipe. PLC shall monitor discharge flow from leak detection pump via flow\n11 transmitter installed in pump's discharge line. PLC shall automatically compute total extracted\n12 leachate from sump. All process variables and equipment status shall be displayed locally via\n13 panel mounted OIU and digital indicators.\n14 b. Program -Program PLC to implement continuous monitoring of liquid levels inside landfill\n15 leak detection system chamber and provide automatic operation of leak detection pump.\n16 Program PLC to automatically operate leak detection pump ON/OFF based upon liquid levels\n17 inside leak detection sump.\n18 c. AUTO Operation -Automatic operation requires operator(s) place leak detection pump's\n19 ON-OFF-AUTO control switch (located at MCC) to AUTO mode and enter sump pump\n20 operation control set-points at the control panel mounted OIU. The landfill leak detection\n21 system pump shall operate between separate start and stop level set-points.\n22 d. Process Control Set-points -Operator(s) shall enter the following control set-points at the\n23 control panel mounted OIU:\n24 (1) Leak detection system pump start level in inches\n25 (2) Leak detection system pump stop level in inches\n26 (3) Landfill leak detection system high-high level alarm in inches\n27 (4) Landfill leak detection system high level alarm in inches\n28 e. REMOTE Operation -None.\n29 f. ON (manual) Operation -ON (manual) Operation requires the following steps be taken by\n30 operator(s):\n31 (1) Operator(s) shall place landfill leak detection pump's ON-OFF-AUTO control switch\n32 (located at MCC) to ON mode.\n33 g. Interlocks -Interlocks shall prevent operation of leachate leak detection pump in the event of\n34 a leachate storage tank high-high level alarm condition, or a leak alarm condition in either the\n35 landfill crest pad building sump, leachate storage tank, or combined sump.\n36 h. Alarms -Program PLC to monitor process and alarm for the following minimum conditions:\n37 (1) Landfill leak detection system high-high level\n38 (2) Landfill leak detection system high level\n39 (3) Landfill leak detection system pump fail\n40 (4) Landfill leak detection system pump flow fail\n41 (5) Landfill leak detection system level signal fail\n42 (6) Landfill leak detection system flow signal fail\n43 i. Runtime and Flow Totaling -Program PLC to implement runtime and flow totals for landfill\n44 leak detection pump. PLC increments equipment runtime and process flows when respective\n45 pump ON status and minimum flow is confirmed. PLC control logic shall be programmed to\n46 allow runtime and flow value reset and adjustment.\nAppendix 4D.253\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 3. Landfill Crest Pad Building Sump System (Loops 105, 205). Reference P&ID Drawing H-2-\n2 830854 sheet I of 4.\n3 a. General -Landfill crest pad building sump system consists of a building sump, sump pump,\n4 level floats, leak detection sensor, and pump discharge piping. Sump pump extracts and pumps\n5 liquids from building sump to an above ground leachate storage tank. Landfill crest pad\n6 building sump pump operates ON/OFF based upon actuation of level floats inside the landfill\n7 crest pad building sump. PLC shall monitor leak detection sensor. All process variables and\n8 equipment status shall be displayed locally via panel mounted OIU and digital indicators.\n9 b. Program -Program PLC to monitor sump float switches and provide automatic operation of\n10 landfill crest pad building sump pump between high and low level status. In the event of high-\n11 high level condition, PLC shall alarm. In the event of a leak alarm condition PLC shall prevent\n12 operation of landfill leachate collection and leak detection pumps.\n13 c. AUTO Operation -Automatic operation requires operator(s) place sump pump's ON-OFF-\n14 AUTO control switch (located at MCC) to AUTO mode. The sump pump shall operate\n15 between start and stop levels. Operator(s) shall place sump leak detection ENABLE/DISABLE\n16 control switch (located at local sump control panel) to ENABLE leak detection control logic.\n17 d. Process Control Set-points -None\n18 e. REMOTE Operation -None\n19 f. ON (manual) Operation -ON (manual) Operation requires the following steps be taken by\n20 operator(s):\n21 (1) Operator(s) shall place sump pump's ON-OFF-AUTO control switch (located at MCC) to\n22 ON mode.\n23 g. Interlocks -Interlocks shall prevent operation of landfill crest pad building sump pump in the\n24 event of a leachate storage tank high-high level alarm condition, or a leak alarm condition in\n25 either the leachate storage tank, or combined sump.\n26 h. Alarms -Program PLC to monitor process and alarm for the following minimum conditions:\n27 (1) Landfill crest pad building sump level high\n28 (2) Landfill crest pad building sump level high-high\n29 (3) Landfill crest pad building sump leak detected\n30 (4) Landfill crest pad building sump pump fail\n31 i. Runtime -PLC shall provide runtime for sump pump. PLC increments equipment runtime\n32 when respective pump ON status is confirmed. PLC control logic shall be programmed to\n33 allow runtime value reset and adjustment.\n34 4. Leachate Storage Tank System (Loops 300, 301). Reference P&ID Drawing H-2-830854 sheet 2\n35 of4.\n36 a. General -Leachate storage tank system consists of an above grade tank with an outer steel\n37 wall, an interstitial leak detection chamber, floating cover, level sensors, leak detection sensors,\n38 and a transfer pump suction connection. Liquid is pumped to leachate storage tank from\n39 landfill leachate collection and leak detection pumps, landfill crest pad building sump pump,\n40 and combined sump. A level sensor located inside a stilling well -mounted inside the storage\n41 tank -provides continuous liquid levels measurements to PLC. This level sensor is backed-up\n42 by additional discrete level switches. All process variables and equipment status shall be\n43 displayed locally via panel mounted OIU and digital indicators.\n44 b. Program -Program PLC to implement continuous monitoring of liquid levels inside leachate\n45 storage tank. Level measurements shall be displayed at control panel inside landfill crest pad\n46 building and local control panel inside leachate transfer building.\nAppendix 4D.254\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Program PLC to monitor level high-high and low-low switches which provide backup safety\n2 measurement and control for the continuous level sensor.\n3 c. AUTO Operation -None.\n4 d. Process Control Set-points:\n5 (1) Leachate storage tank high-high level in inches\n6 (2) Leachate storage tank high level in inches\n7 (3) Leachate storage tank low level in inches\n8 (4) Leachate storage tank low-low level in inches\n9 e. REMOTE Operation -None.\n10 f. ON (manual) Operation -None.\n11 g. Interlocks -Interlocks shall prevent operation of landfill leachate collection and removal and\n12 leak detection pumps, crest pad sump pump, and combined sump pump in the event of a\n13 leachate storage tank high-high level condition alarm condition. Interlocks shall prevent\n14 operation of transfer pump in the event of a storage tank low-low level condition.\n15 h. Alarms -Program PLC to monitor process and alarm for the following minimum conditions:\n16 (1) Leachate storage tank high-high level\n17 (2) Leachate storage tank high level\n18 i. Runtime -None.\n19 5. Combined Sump Pump System (Loops 107, 207). Reference P&ID Drawing H-2-830854\n20 sheet 2 of 4.\n21 a. General -Combined sump pump system consists of a sump assembly with dual chambers\n22 (pump chamber and leak detection chamber), sump pump, level floats, and a leak detection\n23 sensor. Liquids from truck loading station, gravity drain to the sump pump chamber. Liquids\n24 from containment piping, gravity drain to leak detection chamber. All process variables and\n25 equipment status shall be displayed locally via panel mounted OIU and digital indicators.\n26 b. Program -Program PLC to implement automatic operation of combined sump pump.\n27 Combined sump pump shall operate ON/OFF based upon actuation of discrete floats mounted\n28 inside sump: sump high-high alarm level, sump pump high (start) level, sump pump low (stop)\n29 level and sump pump low-low (alarm) level. Program PLC to alarm when high-high level float\n30 switch is activated or low-low level float is actuated and sump pump ON status exists.\n31 Program PLC to monitor operation of leak detection sensor. Sump floats and leak detection\n32 sensor shall be hardwired to intrinsic safety relay modules.\n33 c. AUTO Operation -Automatic operation requires operator(s) place combined sump pump\n34 ON-OFF-AUTO control switch (located inside transfer building) to AUTO mode. Sump pump\n35 shall operate between sump pump start and stop levels.\n36 d. Process Control Set-points -None.\n37 e. REMOTE Operation -None.\n38 f. ON (manual) Operation -ON (manual) Operation requires the following steps be taken by\n39 operator(s):\n40 (1) Operator(s) shall place sump pump ON-OFF-AUTO control switch (located inside transfer\n41 building) to ON mode.\n42 (2) Pump selected to ON mode shall continue to operate until sump pump low-low level is\n43 reached.\n44 g. Interlocks -Interlocks shall prevent operation of combined sump pump in the event of a\n45 leachate storage tank high-high level alarm condition.\nAppendix 4D.255\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Interlocks shall prevent operation of landfill leachate collection and leak detection pumps, and\n2 landfill crest pad building sump pump in the event of a combined sump leak alarm condition.\n3 h. Alarms -Program PLC to monitor process and alarm for the following minimum conditions:\n4 (1) Combined sump high-high level\n5 (2) Combined sump low-low level\n6 (3) Combined sump pump fail\n7 (4) Combined sump leak detected\n8 i. Runtime -Program PLC to provide runtime. PLC shall increment equipment runtime when\n9 pump ON status is confirmed. Implement PLC control logic necessary to allow local runtime\n10 value reset and adjustment.\n11 6. Leachate Transfer Pump System (Loop 302). Reference P&ID Drawing H-2-830854 sheet 2 of 4.\n12 a. General -Leachate transfer pump system consists of a transfer pump with its suction line\n13 connected to leachate storage tank, discharge piping, flow meter, and a truck loading quick\n14 disconnect. System allows operator(s) to pump liquids from leachate storage tank to storage\n15 trucks. All process variables and equipment status shall be displayed locally via panel\n16 mounted OIU and digital indicators.\n17 b. Program -Program PLC to monitor totalized flow from leachate storage tank to truck loading\n18 station for the purpose of determining amount of liquids being trucked off-site. Transfer pump\n19 operation is manual, with interlocks preventing transfer pump operation during a storage tank\n20 low-low level condition.\n21 c. AUTO Operation -None\n22 d. Process Control Set-points -None\n23 e. REMOTE Operation -None\n24 j. ON (manual) Operation -ON (manual) Operation requires the following steps be taken by\n25 operator(s):\n26 (1) Operator(s) shall place transfer pump ON-OFF control switch (located inside transfer\n27 building) to ON mode. Operator(s) shall monitor totalized flow as a means of determining\n28 duration of transfer operation.\n29 f. Interlocks -Interlocks shall prevent transfer pump operation during a storage tank low-low\n30 level condition.\n31 g. Alarms- Program PLC to monitor process and alarm for the following minimum conditions:\n32 (1) Truck Loading Station flow signal fail.\n33 (2) Transfer Pump low flow fail.\n34 h. Flow Totaling -PLC shall provide flow totals for truck loading station. PLC control logic\n35 shall allow for flow reset and value adjustment.\n36 7. Control Panel Power Monitoring System (Loop 219). Reference P&ID Drawing H-2-830854 sheet\n37 1 of 4.\n38 a. General -Control panel power monitoring system consists of a control relay mounted inside\n39 landfill crest pad building control panel. Power to landfill crest pad building control panel is\n40 monitored by this control relay. In the event of a power failure, control relay drops out\n41 removing input status to PLC. The PLC (which is powered by a UPS) senses the loss of signal,\n42 and prevents automatic operation of process equipment. All process variables and equipment\n43 status shall be displayed locally via panel mounted OIU and digital indicators.\n44\n45\nAppendix 4D.256\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 b. Program -Program PLC to monitor power to control panel. In the event of a power failure,\n2 PLC program shall remove run command from all process equipment so as to prevent nuisance\n3 alarming and equipment failure. Program PLC to stagger start equipment after control power\n4 returns to normal.\n5 c. AUTO Operation -None.\n6 d. Process Control Set-points -None.\n7 e. REMOTE Operation -None.\n8 f. ON (manual) Operation -None.\n9 g. Interlocks -Interlocks prevent operation of equipment in the event of loss of power to control\n10 panel.\n11 h. Alarms -Program PLC to monitor and alarm control panel power for following minimum\n12 conditions:\n13 (1) Control Panel Power fail.\n14 i. Runtime -None.\n15 8. Crest Pad and Leachate Transfer Building Temperature Monitoring System (Loops 219, 220).\n16 P&ID drawings H-2-830854 sheets 1 & 2 of 4.\n17 a. General -Crest pad and leachate transfer building temperature monitoring system consists of\n18 an ambient temperature transmitter which monitors the effective operation of building heating\n19 and cooling equipment. All process variables and equipment status shall be displayed locally\n20 via panel mounted OIU and digital indicators.\n21 b. Program -Program PLC to monitor crest pad and leachate transfer building temperature\n22 levels and alarm in the event of temperature alarm condition signifying heating and cooling\n23 equipment failure.\n24 c. Automatic Operation -None.\n25 d. Process Control Set-points:\n26 (1) Landfill crest pad building temperature level high alarm in degrees F\n27 (2) Landfill crest pad building temperature level low alarm in degrees F\n28 (3) Leachate transfer building temperature level high alarm in degrees F\n29 (4) Leachate transfer building temperature level low alarm in degrees F\n30 e. REMOTE Operation -None.\n31 f. ON (manual) Operation -None.\n32 g. Interlocks -None.\n33 h. Alarms -Program PLC to monitor process and alarm for the following minimum conditions:\n34 (1) Landfill crest pad building temperature level high alarm\n35 (2) Landfill crest pad building temperature level low alarm\n36 (3) Landfill crest pad building temperature signal fail alarm\n37 (4) Leachate transfer building temperature level high alarm\n38 (5) Leachate transfer building temperature level low alarm\n39 (6) Leachate transfer building temperature signal fail alarm\n40 i. Runtime -None.\n41 9. Building General Alarm System (Loops 219, 220). Reference P&ID Drawing H-2-830854 sheet 1,\n42 2of4.\nAppendix 4D.257\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 a. General -Building general alarm system consists of alarm lights installed on the exterior wall\n2 of the landfill crest pad building and leachate transfer building which are operated by the PLC.\n3 Alarm light provides a visual method of notifying operator(s) of a general alarm condition.\n4 b. Program -Program PLC to monitor all process loops and initiate general alarm in the event of\n5 an alarm condition. General alarm shall continue until process alarm condition is\n6 acknowledged by operator(s). Acknowledge shall be initiated at pushbutton or OIU on landfill\n7 crest pad building control panel. Program PLC to receive acknowledgement during an alarm\n8 condition, to turn off general alarm light, and be able to initiate a new general alarm in the\n9 event of a new and subsequent alarm condition.\n10 c. AUTO Operation -None.\n11 d. Process Control set-points -None.\n12 e. REMOTE Operation -None.\n13 f. ON (manual) Operation -None.\n14 g. Interlocks -None.\n15 h. Alarms -(See previous loops).\n16 i. Runtime -None.\n17 OlU Displays and Layout\n18 1. General -OIU shall be configured with process displays, data entry, runtime, and alarm screens.\n19 Process set-points and control modes shall be one-shot commands from the OIU.\n20 2. Process display screens shall have a P&ID style of presentation. Displays shall include text for\n21 equipment and process identification. Data entry points and screens shall have a TABLE style of\n22 presentation.\n23 3. Program OIU to enable secured access to process set-points and control modes of operation. OIU\n24 shall be configured with process status display screens, set-point entry, equipment control mode,\n25 equipment runtime, flow totaling, alarm status, and alarm enable/disable screens. Process set-point\n26 and equipment control mode shall be implemented using RETURN ENTRY at the control panel\n27 mounted OIU.\n28 4. Program OIU with three (3) security levels: engineer, operator, and system administrator. Engineer\n29 shall have access to all displays. Operator shall have access to all process status and alarm display\n30 screens but not control mode, alarm enable/disable, and set-point screens. Administrator shall have\n31 access to process status, and alarm enable/disable screens.\n32 5. Configure and link OIU Main Menu, Sub-Menu and Data screens in a logical fashion allowing\n33 operator(s) to logically move through each process control loop, with the ability to access data\n34 entry set-point and control modes as described in this document.\n35 6. Program and configure alarm screens for each alarm as described in this document. OIU alarm\n36 screens shall enable operator(s) to visually identify and acknowledge all alarm conditions for each\n37 process control loop. Alarms shall be acknowledged at local alarm display ONLY. Acknowledge\n38 shall not be broadcast across network from OlUs.\n39 7. Alarm Identifications:\n40 a. Process in Alarm and Unacknowledged: Flashing\n41 b. Process in Alarm and Acknowledged: Steady\n42 8. Configure and link displays in a logical fashion allowing operator(s) to logically access all\n43 processes and select the following:\n44 a. IDF Process System Overviews (Displaying process levels, flows, and temperature for each\n45 system)\n46 b. Disposal Facility Equipment Runtime and Runtime Reset Display\nAppendix 4D.258\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 c. Disposal Facility Process Control Set-point Display(s)\n2 d. Disposal Facility Process Alarm Set-point Display(s)\n3 e. Disposal Facility Process Flow Totalization and Flow Totalization Reset Display\n4 f. Integrated Disposal Facility Alarm Display\nAppendix 4D.259\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Reference Management Directive TFC-034, Rev. A\n2 USQ #04-0016-AA\nCH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc. Manual Management Directive\nRevision TFC-MD-034, REV A\nGRAPHIC PROCESS DISPLAY Page 260 of 3\nCRITERIA FOR HUMAN-MACHINE Issue Date January 9,2004\nINTERFACES\nEffective Date January 12, 2004\nExpiration Date March 1, 2004\nFUNCTIONAL AREA MANAGER: D. C. Lowe\nDOCUMENT OWNER: R. E. Larson\n3 1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE\n4 The purpose of this management directive (MD) is to establish the requirements for standardized criteria\n5 for new graphic process displays (human-machine interfaces) that are being designed or acquired for\n6 process monitoring and control systems of CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc. (CH2M HILL) facilities\n7 and managed projects.\n8 The requirements of this MD are applicable to new monitoring and control system designs (Human-\n9 Machine Interfaces) for CH2M facilities and to projects that have not completed an Acceptance Test\n10 Procedure (ATP). Application of the MD requirements to existing human-machine interfaces systems\n11 and human-machine interfaces systems with a completed ATP will be determined, planned, and\n12 performed in accordance with the resolution of PER-2003-4039.\n13 2.0 IMPLEMENTATION\n14 This management directive is effective on the date shown in the header and will remain in effect until a\n15 new Graphic Process Display Criteria for Human-Machine Interface Standard is issued.\n16 3.0 DIRECTIVE\n17 The following requirements that are based on the national standard ISA-S5.5-1985, \"Graphic Symbols for\n18 Process Displays,\" are the Tank Farm Contractors (TFC) design requirement for new process monitoring\n19 and control systems (Human-Machine Interfaces).\n20 3.1 General\n21 The following general symbol usage standards apply:\n22 1. The graphic process display will follow requirements specified in ISA-S5.5 standard.\n23 2. The use of outline and solid (filled) symbol forms to indicate status is as follows:\n24 * An outline symbol form indicates an off, stopped, or nonactive state.\n25 * A solid (filled) symbol form indicates an on, running, or active state.\n26 * Status designation by use of solid or outline forms are particularly applicable to the rotating\n27 equipment and valves and actuators. In depicting valve position, use solid to show open\n28 (material flowing or active) and outline to show closed (material stopped or nonactive).\n29 * A symbol may be partially filled or shaded to represent the characteristic of the contents of a\n30 vessel, e.g. level, temperature, etc.\nAppendix 4D.260\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 3.2 Color\n2 The following standards are to be applied to the application of color to process displays:\n3 1. The following color application guidelines are to be followed:\n4 * The number of colors in one display should be limited to the minimum necessary (typically 4\n5 or less) to satisfy the process interface objectives of the display.\n6 * Compatible color combinations should be used.\n7 * Use color as a redundant indictor along with text, symbol, shape, size, reverse video,\n8 blinking, and intensity coding to preserve communication with individuals having limited\n9 color perception.\n10 * Colors are not to be used to indicate quantitative value.\n11 2. Colors are to be assigned consistent with Tables 1-4.\n12 Table 1. Unique Component Colors (e.g., Leak Detectors, Tanks)\n(Outline colors and text shall be black (unless otherwise noted), display background to be tan or light blue)\nState Fill Color\nOut of Service Black\nIn Service -Unselected White\nIn Service -Selected (No Alarm) Green\nAlarming (Unacknowledged) Flash Red\nAlarm (Acknowledged) Solid Red\nCaution Alarm (Unacknowledged) Flash Yellow (Amber)\nCaution Alarm (Acknowledged) Solid Yellow (Amber)\nNot Used (e.g., bypassed) Border is white, fill color as noted above\n13 Table 2. Pipe Colors\n(Outline colors and text shall be black (unless otherwise noted), display background to be tan or light blue)\nState Fill Color\nOut of Service Black\nIn Service -Unselected White\nIn Service -Selected (No Alarm) Grey\nIn Service -Selected (with Air or Fluid Flow) Green\nEncasement Leak Detector Alarming Red with Flashing Text\n(Unacknowledged)\nEncasement Leak Detector Alarm Solid Red\n(Acknowledged)\nCaution Alarm (Unacknowledged) Flash Yellow (Amber)\nCaution Alarm (Acknowledged) Solid Yellow (Amber)\nNot Used (e.g., bypassed) Border is white, fill color as noted above\n14\nAppendix 4D.261\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Table 3. Valves Port Colors\n(Outline colors and text shall be black (unless otherwise noted), display background to be tan or light blue)\nState Fill Color\nOut of Service Black\nIn Service -Unselected Grey*\nIn Service -Selected/Operable: Open Port (No Alarm) Green\nIn Service -Selected/Operable: Shut Port (No Alarm) White*\nIn Service -Operating: Transition Yellow (All Ports)\nValve Position Alarm (Unacknowledged) Flash Red\nValve Position Alarm (Acknowledged) Solid Red\nCaution Alarm Flash Yellow (Amber)\nNot Used (e.g., bypassed) Border is white, fill color as noted above\n2 * The grey color used for the unselected valve is for contrast with an unselected pipe (white), which assists the operator in\n3 distinguishing the pipe from the valve (operator influence from display screen tests). The white color used to identify a shut port\n4 on a valve is in contrast with the valve open ports (green) and with the selected pipe (grey) which assists the operator in\n5 distinguishing the pipe from the valve.\n6 Table 4. Pump Colors\n(Outline colors and text shall be black (unless otherwise noted), display background to be tan or light blue)\nState Fill Color Text\nOut of Service Black --\nIn Service -Unselected White --\nIn Service -Selected: Pump Off and Power Off (No Alarm) Grey Stopped\nIn Service -Selected: Pump Off and Power On (No Alarm) Yellow Stopped\nIn Service -Selected: Pump On (Rotating) Green Running\nPump Alarm (Unacknowledged) Flash Red Stopped\nPump Alarm (Acknowledged) Solid Red Stopped\nCaution Alarm (Unacknowledged) Flash Yellow (Amber) Caution\n7 4.0 RECORDS\n8 No records are generated in the performance of this management directive.\n9 5.0 REFERENCES\n10 Instrument Society of America (ISA) S5.5-1985, \"Graphic Symbols for Process Displays.\"\n11\nAppendix 4D.262\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nPLC AND OIU APPLICATION SOFTWARE SETPOINTS FOR CELLS NO. 1 AND NO. 2\nRev Tag I Tag 2 Tag 3 Tag 4 System Setpoint Drawing Process Ranges Eng. CommentsDescription Description Units\nArea Process ISA Eqt #\nLeachate Collection High High Alarm H-2-830854 12.0 inches above Actuate elevation\n2 219(Y) LH LAHH 101 LCRS 50' x 50' Inches 639and Removal System Level Setpoint sheet 1 of 4 673.90sump floor.\nActuate elevation\nLeachate Collection High Alarm Level H-2-830854 11.0 inches above 673.82, activates\n1 219(Y) LH LAH 101 and Removal System Setpoint sheet 1 of 4 LCRS 50' x 50' Inches slightly above elevation\nsump floor that LCRS High Flow\npump On activates\n219(Y) LH LAIH 104 Leak Detection High High Alarm H-2-830854 12.0 inches above Inches Actuate elevation\nSystem Level Setpoint sheet I of 4 LDS sump floor 671.90\nLeak Detection High Alarm Level H-2-830854 11.0 inches above Actuate elevation\nSystem Setpoint sheet 1 of 4 LDS sump floor 671.82\nLeachate Collection Low Flow Pump H-2-830854 Half of Design Flowrate\n1 219(Y) LH FALL 202 and Removal System Flow Fail Setpoint sheet I of4 5 gpm of 10 gpm\nLow Flow Pump\nConservative\napproximation for timeLLacheoalleo low Fl Pump H-2-830854 needed to fill empty\nL a h t Col cinLow Flow 180 Secondsse t o discharge piping plus2 219(Y) LH FALL 202 and Removal System Flow Fail Timer sheet 1 of 418Seod dicagppnglu\nLow Flow Pump Setpoint 20%. Can refine during\ntesting.\n6.00 inches aboveAcutelvio\n2 19( LH LAM 202 Leachate Collection Low Flow Pump H-2-830854 LCRS 50' x 50' Inches Actuate elevation\nand Removal System Start Level Setpoint sheet I of 4 673.40\nsump floor\n0.65 inch aboveLeachate Collection Low Flow Pump H-2-830854 LC5 x 50' Actuate elevation\n219A LH LAL 202 and Removal System Stop Level Setpoint sheet I of 4 LCRS 50'x 50' Inches 672.95sump floor 629\nLeachate Collection Low Flow Pump H-2-830854 1.75 inches above Actuate elevation\nand Removal System Stop Level Setpoint sheet 3 of4 sump floor 673.04sump floor\nAppendix 4D.263\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nPLC AND OIU APPLICATION SOFTWARE SETPOINTS FOR CELLS NO. I AND NO. 2\nRev Tag 1 Tag 2 Tag 3 Tag 4 System Setpoint Eng. CommentsDescription Description Drawing Process Ranges Units\nArea Process ISA Eqt #\nLeachate Collection High Flow Pump H-2-830854 C ncesxabove Actuate elevation219(Y) LH LAM 203 and Removal System Start Level Setpoint sheet I of 4 LCRS 50'x 50' Inches 673.80sump floor\n219A H LA 2034.25 inches above\nLeachate Collection High Flow Pump H-2-830854 LC5 xnches Actuate elevation\nand Removal System Stop Level Setpoint sheet 1 of 4 LCRS 50'x 50' Inches 673.22sump floor\nLeachate Collection High Flow Pump H-2-830854 9. incesxabove Actuate elevation219E LH LAL 203 and Removal System Stop Level Setpoint sheet 3 of 4 LCRS 50'x 50' Inches 673.67sump floor\nLeachate Collection High Flow Pump H-2-830854 Half of Design Flowrate\n1 219(Y) LH FALL 203 and Removal System Flow Fail Setpoint sheet 1 of 4 o gpm f 147 gpmHigh Flow Pump\nConservative\nLeachate Collection High Flow Pump approximation for time\n1 219(Y) LH FALL 203 and Removal System Flow Fail Timer H-2-830854 40 Seconds needed to fill empty\nHigh Flow Pump Setpoint sheet I of 4 discharge piping plus\n20%. Can refine during\ntesting.\neak Detection LH-2-830854 Half of Design Flowrate\n1 219(Y) LH FALL 204 Pump Flow Fail sheet I of 4gpm\nSetpoint\nConservative\nLeak Detection approximation for time\nLeak Detection H-2-830854 needed to fill empty\nSystem PmprFloil sheet I of 4 discharge piping plus\n20%. Can refine during\ntesting.\nLeak Detection Leak Detection H-2-830854 10.8 inches above Actuate elevation1 219(Y) LH LAM 204 Pump Start Level InchesSystem Stt sheet I of 4 LDS sump floor 671.80Setpoint\nAppendix 4D.264\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nPLC AND OIU APPLICATION SOFTWARE SETPOINTS FOR CELLS NO. 1 AND NO. 2\nSyste SetointEng.Rev Tag I Tag 2 Tag 3 Tag 4 System Setpoint Drawing Process Ranges Unit CommentsDescription Description Units\nArea Process ISA Eqt #\nLeak Detection Leak Detection H-2-830854 5.25 inches above Actuate elevation\nI 219(Y) LH LAL 204 System Pump Stop Level sheet 1 of 4 LDS sump floor Inches 671.34\nSetpoint\n219(Y) LH TAH 219 Crest Pad Building Temperature High H-2-830854 90 Fahrenheit AC will allow 85\n1 1 C Alarm Setpoint sheet I of 4 degrees F max temp\nTemperature Low H-2-830854 Fahrenheit Heater will allow 50\n219(Y) LH TAL 219 Crest Pad Building Alarm Setpoint sheet 1 of 4 degrees F low temp\n219(Y) LH TAH 220 Transfer Bildi Temperature High H-2-830854 90 Fahrenheit AC will allow 85\n1u g Alarm Setpoint sheet 1 of 4 degrees F max temp\n219(Y) LH TAL 220 T f Building Temperature Low H-2-830854 Heater will allow 50\n1 ranser Alarm Setpoint sheet 1 of 4 Fahrenheit degrees F low temp\nActuate elevation\n728.33, Activates at\n. same elev as Hardware\n219(Y) Leachate Storage High High Alarm H-2-830854 74.4 inches above Inhe HH at ax\n201 Tank Level Setpoint sheet I of 4 tank floor at wall operating capacity\n6.2'), allowing 2 ft of\nfreeboard\nActivates at 24 Actuate elevation\nI 219(Y) LH LAH 301 Leachate Storage High Alarm Level H-2-830854 inches above tank Inches 724.13, reserving 4.2 ft\n201 Tank Setpoint sheet 1 of 4 operating capacity forfloor at wall design storm event\nActivates just\nbefore falling water Actuate elevation\n219(Y) Leachate Storage Low Alarm Level H-2-830854 level reaches 722.78 (approximately\n1 201 LH LAL 301 Tank Setpoint sheet I of 4 Hardware LL (7.8 Inches I -9,000 gallon truck\ninches above tank load above the Low\nfloor at wall) Low Setpoint)\nsetpoint\nAppendix 4D.265\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nPLC AND OIU APPLICATION SOFTWARE SETPOINTS FOR CELLS NO. I AND NO. 2\nRev Tag I Tag 2 Tag 3 Tag 4 Sycsrtion Sp ion Drawing Process Ranges nis Comments\nArea Process ISA Eqt #\nActivates at same elev\nas Hardware LL switch,\nactivates just before\n1 219(Y) LH LALL 301 Leachate Storage Low Low Alarm H-2-830854 6 inches above tank Inches falling water level\n201 Tank Level Setpoint sheet I of 4 floor at wall reaches 6 inches above\ntank floor (722.63),\nassuring transfer pump\ndoes not run dry\n1 219(Y) LH FALL 302-1 Leachate Transfer Transfer Pump Low H-2-830854 125 gpm Half of Design Flowrate\n1 Pump Flow Fail Setpoint sheet 1 of 4 at 250 gpm\nConservative\nTransfer Pump Low approximation for time\nI 219(Y) LH FALL 302-1 Leachate Transfer Flow Fail Timer H-2-830854 10 Seconds needed to fill empty\n1 Pump Setpoint sheet 1 of 4 discharge piping plus\n20%. Can refine during\ntesting.\n(Y) = A for Cell No. 1 For Cell No. I reference corresponding H-2-830854 sheet I of 4 and sheet 2 of 4.\n(Y) = E for Cell No. 2 For Cell No. 2 reference corresponding H-2-830854 sheet 3 of 4 and sheet 4 of 4.\nAppendix 4D.266\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nDIVISION 14 (NOT USED)\nAppendix 4D.267\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nDIVISION 15 (NOT USED)\nAppendix 4D.268\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 15021 -HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) PIPE SCHED. B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 Summary\n4 This section is for furnishing and installing leachate piping and associated components.\n5 References\n6 The publications listed below form a part of this Specification to the extent referenced. The publications\n7 are referred to in the text by basic designation only. Recognizing some requirements of the references\n8 cited below may not be applicable, the Engineer shall judge the applicability of compliance with the\n9 references not specifically addressed herein. In the event of a conflict between the text of this\n10 Specification and the references cited herein, the text of this Specification shall take precedence or as\n11 directed by the Engineer.\n12 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n13 ASTM D792 Standard Test Methods for Density and Specific Gravity (Relative Density) of\n14 Plastics by Displacement.\n15 ASTM D1248 Specification for Polyethylene Plastics Molding and Extrusion Materials.\n16 ASTM D1505 Standard Test Method for Density of Plastics by the Density-Gradient Technique.\n17 ASTM D2513 Specification for Thermoplastic Gas Pressure Pipe, Tubing, and Fittings.\n18 ASTM D3350 Specification for Polyethylene Plastics Pipe and Fitting Materials.\n19 ASTM F714 Standard Specification for Polyethylene Plastic Pipe (SDR-PR) Based on Outside\n20 Diameter.\n21 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS (CFR)\n22 49 CFR 192.285 Plastic pipe; qualifying persons to make joints.\n23 Description\n24 Pipe: This section includes all high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe used in the cells including but not\n25 limited to:\n26 Leachate collection piping on floor and cleanout access pipes on the slopes of the trench.\n27 Leachate discharge piping, leak detection piping, and associated riser pipes.\n28 Double containment piping outside the cell (e.g., leachate force main and drain lines) and elsewhere\n29 as shown on the Drawings.\n30 Submittals-Approval Required\n31 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n32 Manufacturer's design guidance that includes spacer maximum spacing, attachment method,\n33 orientation and material type.\n34 Manufacturer's certificates of compliance for all pipe and fittings. Certificates shall acknowledge\n35 that pipe and fittings meet the requirements of the Specifications.\n36 Descriptive literature about the fusion equipment to be used and certification from the pipe supplier or\n37 manufacturer that the joining technician(s) is certified and experienced in heat fusion joining of\n38 HDPE pipe. Certification shall contain the following minimum information:\n39 Name of technician.\n40 Date of certification.\nAppendix 4D.269\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Statement by the pipe supplier that the technician is certified in the means and methods of joining the\n2 supplier's pipe and fittings using butt fusion techniques.\n3 Make(s) and model(s) of fusion equipment the technician is certified to join pipe with.\n4 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n5 Information/Record (IR):\n6 Catalog and manufacturer's data sheets for HDPE pipe and fittings.\n7 Catalog and manufacturer's data sheets, electrofusion couplers, mechanical cutters, and\n8 appurtenances.\n9 Part 2 -Products\n10 All HDPE pipe and fittings shall conform with additional applicable requirements defined in the Piping\n11 Schedule in Section 15060, PIPING-GENERAL.\n12 HDPE Pipe\n13 Resin: HDPE pipe shall be manufactured from first quality extra-high molecular weight, high density\n14 polyethylene resin containing no more than 2 percent clean recycled polymer by weight. Resin shall meet\n15 or exceed the requirements of ASTM D3350 for PE3408 material with a cell classification of 345434C or\n16 higher. Alternate cell classifications are acceptable if one or more of the 6 numbers in the cell\n17 classification is greater than the minimum. Pipe shall be rated PE3408. Pipe and fittings shall be in\n18 compliance with schedule attached as supplement (see Attachment 1, HIGH DENSITY\n19 POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) PIPE) or as shown on the Drawings.\n20 Quality: The pipe shall have uniform wall thickness and shall be uniform in color, opacity, density, and\n21 other physical properties. Pipe shall be homogeneous throughout and free of visible cracks, holes,\n22 blisters, bubbles, undispersed raw materials, or any contamination by foreign matter. Any pipe with\n23 nicks, scrapes, or gouges deeper than 10 percent of the nominal wall thickness shall be rejected.\n24 Form: Pipe may be supplied in a continuous extruded seamless piece or in sections.\n25 Manufacturer's Certificates of Compliance:\n26 The manufacturer shall submit a Certificate of Compliance of the HDPE pipe supplied for the IDF\n27 project, which will include that the pipe is grade PE3408 and the identity of the cell classification per\n28 ASTM D3350.\n29 HDPE pipe SDR shall be as indicated on the Piping Schedule in Section 15060, PIPING-GENERAL.\n30 Fittings:\n31 Fittings shall conform to the requirements of Article IDPE PIPE of this section, shall be compatible\n32 with components of the double containment system, and HDPE manholes where required.\n33 Polyethylene fittings shall be from the same manufacturer as the pipe (or approved equal), molded or\n34 fabricated from polyethylene pipe and shall have the same or numerically smaller SDR than pipe\n35 connecting to the fitting. Fittings shall follow requirements in Attachment 1.\n36 All reducing tees shall be factory molded if available as a standard item by any manufacturer having\n37 pipe meeting this section. If not available as a standard item, branch saddle reducing tees shall be\n38 used. Reducers shall be shop manufactured. Fabricated branch connections will not be allowed if\n39 branch saddle connections are listed in the manufacturer's catalog.\n40 All molded polyethylene fittings shall have the same or higher pressure rating as the pipe when\n41 installed in accordance with the latest technical specifications. All fabricated polyethylene fittings\n42 shall have the same or higher pressure rating as the adjoining pipe when installed in accordance with\n43 the manufacturer's recommendations.\nAppendix 4D.270\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Double Containment Pipe\n2 Pipe Materials: Both carrier pipe and containment pipe shall meet the requirements of Article HDPE\n3 PIPE of this section.\n4 Configuration: Double containment pipe shall consist of a carrier pipe installed within a containment\n5 pipe. All pipe and fittings shall provide an annular space between the carrier and containment pipes to\n6 accommodate possible flow of fluid from the carrier pipe.\n7 Support Spacers: Support spacers shall be manufactured from nonmetallic, corrosion-resistant material\n8 with the same or better chemical compatibility properties as the HDPE pipe. Spacer intervals and\n9 attachment method to the carrier pipe shall be in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.\n10 Spacing shall be reduced if required to maintain the annulus between the carrier and containment pipes\n11 and shall be positioned to allow for unrestricted passage of possible flow of fluid from the carrier pipe.\n12 Spacers shall be chamfered at both ends to allow for removal of carrier pipe. Materials and systems used\n13 to secure the spacers to the pipe shall have the same or better chemical compatibility properties as the\n14 HDPE pipe.\n15 Fittings: Fittings shall conform to the requirements of Article HDPE PIPE of this section and shall be\n16 compatible with components of the single wall HDPE pipe where required (except for trench riser pipes).\n17 Slotted Pipe\n18 Leachate Collection Piping: Leachate collection and leak detection piping on the floor of the cells and\n19 elsewhere as shown on the Drawings shall be slotted. Cleanout access pipes and leachate transmission\n20 piping shall not be slotted.\n21 In addition to meeting all other requirements of this section, slotted pipe shall have slots 0.128 inch wide\n22 and 1.25 inches long, in five places equidistant around the pipe for 12-inch and 18-inch diameter pipes.\n23 Slots shall provide a minimum of 9 square inches of open area per linear foot of pipe for 12-inch and 18-\n24 inch diameter pipes. For 3-inch diameter slotted pipe, the pipe supplier shall propose a configuration of\n25 0.128-inch wide slots that provides a maximum of 7 square inches of open area per linear foot of pipe.\n26 Slotted pipes shall be free of cutting debris from the slot cutting process.\n27 Perforated pipe with circular drill holes is not allowed.\n28 Part 3 -Execution\n29 General\n30 All HDPE pipe and fittings shall be installed in conformance with applicable code requirements\n31 referenced in Section 15060, PIPING-GENERAL.\n32 Dimensions\n33 Piping dimensions shown on the Drawings are approximate. It is the Construction General\n34 Contractor's responsibility to furnish and install piping of the proper dimensions, which will properly\n35 fit with the connecting elements, pipes, fittings, pumps, etc.\n36 Installation\n37 Pipe shall be handled and stored in such a manner as to ensure a sound, undamaged condition.\n38 Pipe shall be cut in a neat, workmanlike manner using a mechanical cutter that will not damage the\n39 pipe.\n40 Joining of HDPE pipe to HDPE pipe shall be accomplished by thermal butt fusion joint; no solvent\n41 welding or adhesive welding shall be allowed. Electrofusion couplings shall only be allowed when\n42 access to piping is restricted and only as approved by the Engineer. Slotted leachate collection piping\n43 shall be joined with thermal butt fusionjoints. Pipe shall be joined per ASTM D2657 and\n44 manufacturer's recommendations.\nAppendix 4D.271\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Single butt fusion welds shall be used to create pipe sections as long as practicable. Fabricated pipe\n2 sections and fittings may be joined by the double butt fusion process.\n3 During installation, the pipe shall not be pulled across sharp projections that could cause gouges,\n4 kinks, or other types of damage. To minimize \"snaking\" due to thermal expansion, protect pipe from\n5 direct sunlight, or limit unrestrained length of pipe during installation.\n6 Allowance for Thermal Expansion/Contraction:\n7 HDPE has a coefficient of thermal expansion of 1.2 x 10-4 ft/ft/deg F. Buried HDPE pipe shall be\n8 installed with excess length between anchor points such that contraction caused by temperature drop to\n9 40 degrees F will produce the length of pipe between two points shown on the Drawings. Amount of\n10 excess pipe depends on temperatures of pipe at the time of installation, according to Table I for buried\n11 piping:\n12 TABLE 1\nInstallation Temperature (degrees F) Excess Pipe Length\n(in./100 ft)\n50 1.4\n60 2.9\n70 4.3\n80 5.8\n90 7.2\n100 8.6\n120 11.5\n13 Installation temperature is of the pipe material and not ambient air temperature. Measure installation\n14 temperature with a strip thermometer laid directly on the pipe. Verify temperate and excess pipe length\n15 required immediately before burial.\n16 Placement of Buried Pipes:\n17 Excavate trench bottom and sides of ample dimensions to permit visual inspection and testing of\n18 entire flange, valve, or connection.\n19 The pipe shall not be dropped into the trench. Exercise care when lowering pipe into trench to\n20 prevent twisting or damage to pipe. The full length of the pipe shall be firmly bedded on the trench\n21 bottom.\n22 The pipe shall be bedded in such a way as to maintain grade with a tolerance of -0.0 percent,\n23 +0.5 percent with a uniform, constant grade and no localized low spots.\n24 Pipe Base and Pipe Zone:\n25 As specified in Section 02320, TRENCH BACKFILL.\n26 Keep trench dry until pipe laying and joining are completed.\n27 Prevent foreign material from entering pipe during placement.\n28 Close and block open end of last laid pipe section when placement operations are not in progress and\n29 at close of day's work.\n30 Install closure sections and adapters for gravity piping at locations where pipe laying changes\n31 direction.\n32 After joint has been made, check pipe alignment and grade.\nAppendix 4D.272\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Place sufficient pipe zone material to secure pipe from movement before next joint is installed.\n2 Prevent uplift and floating of pipe prior to backfilling.\n3 Place pipe along pipe runs starting at one end and moving towards the other to avoid joints that will not\n4 be feasible with butt fusion.\n5 Tolerances: Horizontal position of pipe centerline on alignment around curves maximum variation of\n6 1.0 foot from position shown.\n7 Pipe Cover:\n8 Minimum 2 feet 6 inches from finished elevation of overlying material, unless otherwise shown.\n9 Temporarily close pipe ends as required to avoid introducing dirt or other foreign material into the pipe.\n10 Trenching and backfilling operations shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of\n11 Section 02320, TRENCH BACKFILL, for utility trenching. If trenching is used, underlying materials\n12 shall not be disturbed or damaged in anyway. Backfilling operations shall ensure that no voids are\n13 present under or at the sides of the pipe. Backfill shall initially be placed to the top of the pipe, then hand\n14 compacted. The remainder of the trench shall then be backfilled and compacted by hand or with a power\n15 tamper only.\n16 On the floor of the cell, pipe may be placed directly on geosynthetic layers prior to placing drainage\n17 gravel. Placement of gravel around pipes shall be by hand unless otherwise approved by the Engineer.\n18 Placement operations shall ensure that no voids are present under or at the sides of the pipe. Placement\n19 operations shall not disturb the position of the pipe.\n20 Where flanged joints are used, the bolts shall be evenly torqued using a crossing pattern to gradually\n21 tighten the lug nuts. Torque values shall be as recommended by the flange manufacturer. Flanged joints\n22 shall be retorqued after one hour or more has passed. Apply anti-seize compound on all threaded surfaces\n23 before tightening.\n24 Flaws (minor imperfections, damaged areas, etc.) in HDPE pipe with a depth of 10 percent or less of the\n25 nominal wall thickness will not require repair or replacement. In double containment systems, carrier\n26 pipe with flaws deeper than 10 percent of the wall thickness shall be replaced. Single pipe or containment\n27 pipe with flaws between 10 and 25 percent of the wall thickness shall be repaired in accordance with the\n28 pipe manufacturer's recommendations. The Construction General Contractor shall certify in writing that\n29 the repaired area will have material properties that meet or exceed those of intact pipe. Any pipe with\n30 flaws deeper than 25 percent of the nominal wall thickness shall be rejected.\n31 All valves and equipment shall be supported independently from pipe. Anchor valves such that turning\n32 moment resulting from their operation will not be transmitted to pipe.\n33 Special Precautions at Flanges: Polyethylene pipe connected to heavy fittings, manholes, and rigid\n34 structures shall be supported in such a manner that no subsequent relative movement between\n35 polyethylene pipe at flanged joint and rigid structures is possible.\n36 Butt-fusion shall be performed in accordance with pipe manufacturer's recommendations as to equipment\n37 and technique.\n38 Weld Beads: Remove internal weld beads from the side slope risers and horizontal sections of slotted\n39 pipe where the LCRS and LDS pumps will be placed and the horizontal and vertical sections of the LCRS\n40 level transducer pipe. Remove all plastic debris from inside pipe.\n41 Slotted Pipe: Slotted pipe shall be cut and joined so that full contact is made around the entire\n42 circumference of the weld. Partial weld contact because ofjoints through a slot row is not acceptable.\n43 Locator Ribbon\n44 Locator ribbon shall be installed as specified in Section 02320, TRENCH BACKFILL.\nAppendix 4D.273\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Identification Ribbon\n2 Underground pipelines, except for pipelines inside the Phase I liner limits, shall be identified by use of a\n3 plastic ribbon or stencil no less than 3 inches in width with a message printed on the ribbon, which\n4 identifies the actual pipeline contents. Marking tapes or stencils shall be placed on existing lines where\n5 they are exposed by trenching operations. The ribbon shall be wrapped around the pipeline at no less than\n6 1 wrap per 3 feet of run. The plastic ribbon/stencil shall be color coded in accordance with the Piping\n7 Schedule.\n8 Cleaninq\n9 Clean all piping as required in Section 15060, PIPING-GENERAL, to remove all foreign materials\n10 including dirt, grease, and other matter.\n11 Construction Quality Control (Acceptance Testing)\n12 Per Section 15992, PIPING LEAKAGE TESTING, and the Piping Schedule in Section 15060, PIPING-\n13 GENERAL.\n14 END OF SECTION 15021\n15\nAppendix 4D.274\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nAttachment 1, High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) Pipe\nItem Size Description\nGeneral All Pipe lengths, fittings, and flanged connections to be joined by\nthermal butt-fusion shall be of the same type, grade, and class of\npolyethylene compound and supplied from the same raw material\nsupplier.\nPipe Pipe SDR shall be AS INDICATED ON THE Piping Schedule in\nSection 15060, PIPING-GENERAL.\nProtection shall be provided against ultraviolet light degradation\nusing carbon black, not less than 2 percent well dispersed in the\nresin.\nPipe wall thickness shall reflect the required SDR* and diameter, as\nshown in Table 8, ASTM F714.\n*SDR: standard dimension ratio = OD/thickness\nFittings 6-inch and smaller Molded fittings, butt fusionjoined, conforming to ASTM D3261.\n8-inch and larger Molded if manufactured as a standard item or same as pipe, butt\nfusionjoined, conforming to ASTM D3350.\nElectrofusion Rigid, straight coupler constructed from injection-\nCouplers molded polyethylene with embedded heating coils as manufactured\nby Central Plastics; or equivalent.\nFlanges ASTM A351 Type 316/CF8M stainless steel, 150-pound,\nANSI 816.5 standard, convoluted back-up ring with one-piece\npolyethylene molded flange adaptor ends, same rating pressure as\npipe.\nBolting Stainless steel, ASTM A193/A193M Grade B8M studs and\nASTM Al94/A194M Grade 8M hex head nuts.\nManufacturer's recommended anti-seize compound on all threads.\nWashers shall be same material as bolts.\nGaskets Flat ring, 1/8-inch Viton.\nAppendix 4D.275\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 15022 -HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE MANHOLES SCHED. B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 References\n4 The following is a list of standards, which may be referenced in this section:\n5 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n6 ASTM D1248 Specification for Polyethylene Plastics Molding and Extrusion Materials.\n7 ASTM D3350 Specification for Polyethylene Plastics Pipe and Fitting Materials.\n8 Submittals-Approval Required\n9 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n10 Shop Drawings:\n11 Product data sheets for make and model.\n12 Complete catalog information, descriptive literature, specifications, construction drawings, and\n13 identification of materials of construction.\n14 Provide calculations indicating diameter and wall thickness of each manhole is acceptable per design\n15 criteria specified.\n16 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n17 Information/Record (IR): Submit results of manhole leakage testing.\n18 Part 2 -Products\n19 HDPE Manholes\n20 The manhole shall be manufactured by the fabrication of high density polyethylene (HDPE pipe).\n21 The riser shall be made of HDPE plastic compound meeting the requirements of Type III, Class C,\n22 Category 5, Grade P34 as defined in ASTM D1248. The cell classification shall be 345434C per\n23 ASTM D3350. Alternate cell classifications are acceptable if one or more of the six numbers in the\n24 cell classification are greater than the minimum. Pipe shall be rated PE3408.\n25 Flatstock shall meet or exceed ASTM D1248 requirements for Type III, Class C, Category 3,\n26 Grade G5.\n27 HDPE pipe and flatstock used to fabricate the HDPE manhole shall meet all product requirements of\n28 Section 15021, HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) PIPE. HDPE pipe for 76-inch\n29 diameter manhole shall be SIDR 39.0. HDPE pipe for 42-inch diameter manhole shall be SDR 21.\n30 Welding rods, connecting couplings, pipe collars and other materials, as required to complete the\n31 installation, shall be of the same plastic as the flatstock.\n32 Piping and appurtenances shall meet the requirements of Section 15021, HIGH DENSITY\n33 POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) PIPE, and Section 15060, PIPING-GENERAL.\n34 Access hatch shall be precast vault lid with spring-assisted galvanized plate cover with locking latch;\n35 cover shall be weather tight with channel drain. Utility Vault Model 77-2-332P; or approved equal.\n36 Wall thickness and diameter of each manhole shall be verified assuming the following design criteria:\n37 Dimensions specified and depth of manholes identified on Drawings.\n38 Lateral load transmitted to 76-inch diameter manhole from concrete ring footing shown on Drawing\n39 H-2-830850.\n40 Weight of precast utility vault equal to 4,020 pounds.\n41 Load on utility vault equal to 100 pounds per square foot (vault will not have traffic loads).\n42 No groundwater forces acting on 76-inch diameter manhole.\nAppendix 4D.276\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 42-inch manhole full of water.\n2 Part 3 -Execution\n3 Fabrication\n4 Inlet and outlet piping shall be installed as shown on Drawings by fabricator prior to delivery to site.\n5 The manhole shall be fabricated with the minimum number of welds practical.\n6 All welds shall be heat fused in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations on equipment\n7 specifically designed for welding thermoplastic sheets or extrusion welded by precertified welders.\n8 Installation\n9 Manholes shall be handled and stored according to manufacturer's recommendations and in such a\n10 manner as to ensure a sound undamaged condition.\n11 Excavation and backfilling operations shall be conducted in accordance with Section 02316,\n12 EXCAVATION, and Section 02315, FILL AND BACKFILL.\n13 Joining of HDPE field piping to HDPE manhole pipe stubouts shall be done by thermal butt or socket\n14 fusion, no solvent or adhesive welding shall be allowed. HDPE welding shall be by qualified and\n15 approved welders as identified in Section 15021, HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE)\n16 PIPE.\n17 Install piping, appurtenances, and pipe hangers and supports in accordance with Section 15021,\n18 HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) PIPE, and Section 15060, PIPING-GENERAL.\n19 Install access hatch in accordance with Drawings.\n20 Construction Quality Control -Leakage Testing\n21 After all HDPE manhole pipe stubout connections have been completed for inner and outer HDPE\n22 manholes, and prior to backfilling, perform separate leakage tests for inner and outer manholes. Each\n23 manhole shall be completely filled with water and no leaking shall be allowed from any HDPE joints for a\n24 period of 8 hours. General Construction Contractor shall provide necessary shoring during leakage\n25 testing of outer manhole per manufacturer's recommendations to compensate for lack of backfill.\n26 END OF SECTION 15022\nAppendix 4D.277\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 15060 -PIPING-GENERAL SCHED. B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 Summary\n4 This section is for furnishing and installing leachate piping and associated components.\n5 References\n6 The following is a list of standards, which may be referenced in this section and any supplemental Data\n7 Sheets:\n8 AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANSI)\n9 ANSIB1.20.1 Pipe Threads, General Purpose (Inch)\n10 ANSI B16.1 Cast Iron Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings\n11 ANSI B 16.3 Malleable Iron Threaded Fittings\n12 ANSI B 16.5 Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings\n13 ANSI B16.11 Forged Fittings, Socket-Welding and Threaded\n14 ANSI B16.21 Nonmetallic Flat Gaskets for Pipe Flanges\n15 ANSI B16.42 Ductile Iron Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings, Classes 150 and 300\n16 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS (ASME)\n17 ASME B36.OM Welded and Seamless Wrought Steel Pipe\n18 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION (AWWA)\n19 AWWA C 153/ Ductile-Iron Compact Fittings 3 Inches Through 24 Inches and\n20 A21.53 54 Inches Through 64 Inches, for Water Service\n21 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n22 ASTM A153 Standard Specification for Zinc Coating (Hot-Dip) on Iron and Steel Hardware\n23 ASTM A307 Standard Specification for Carbon Steel Bolts and Studs, 60,000 psi Tensile\n24 Strength\n25 ASTM A536 Standard Specification for Ductile Iron Castings\n26 ASTM A563 Standard Specification for Carbon and Alloy Steel Nuts\n27 ASTM D1248 Standard Specification for Polyethylene Plastics Molding and Extrusion\n28 Materials\n29 ASTM D1784 Standard Specification for Rigid Poly(Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Compounds and\n30 Chlorinated Poly( Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Compounds\n31 ASTM D1785 Standard Specification for Poly(Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Plastic Pipe,\n32 Schedules 40, 80, and 120\n33 ASTM D2467 Standard Specification for Socket-Type Poly(Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Plastic Pipe\n34 Fittings, Schedule 80\n35 ASTM D2564 Standard Specification for Solvent Cements for Poly(Vinyl Chloride) (PVC)\n36 Plastic Piping Systems\n37 ASTM D3261 Standard Specification for Butt Heat Fusion Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Fittings\n38 for Polyethylene (PE) Plastic Pipe and Tubing\nAppendix 4D.278\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 ASTM D3350 Standard Specification for Polyethylene Plastics Pipe and Fittings Materials\n2 Submittals-Approval Required\n3 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n4 Product data sheets, complete catalog information, descriptive literature, specifications, and identification\n5 of materials of construction.\n6 Laboratory Testing Equipment: Certified calibrations, manufacturer's product data, and test\n7 procedures.\n8 Qualifications:\n9 Solvent Welders: List of solvent welders and current test records for solvent welder(s) for field solvent\n10 welding.\n11 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n12 Information/Record (IR): Manufacturer's Certification of Compliance.\n13 Part 2 -Products\n14 Piping\n15 High Density Polyethylene Piping:\n16 As specified in Section 15021, HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) PIPE.\n17 Others as specified on Piping Data Sheet(s) and Piping Schedule located at the end of this section as\n18 Supplement.\n19 Diameters Shown:\n20 Standardized Products: Nominal size.\n21 Fabricated Steel Piping (Except Cement-Lined): Outside diameter, ASME B36.1OM.\n22 Joints\n23 Flanged Joints:\n24 Flat-faced carbon steel or alloy flanges when mating with flat-faced cast or ductile iron flanges.\n25 Higher pressure rated flanges as required to mate with equipment when equipment flange is of higher\n26 pressure rating than required for piping.\n27 Threaded Joints:\n28 NPT taper pipe threads in accordance with ANSI B 1.20.1.\n29 Mechanical connections of high density polyethylene pipe to auxiliary equipment such as valves,\n30 pumps, tanks, and other piping systems shall be through flanged connections consisting of products as\n31 specified in Section 15021, HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) PIPE, and bolts and nuts\n32 of sufficient length to show a minimum of three complete threads when the joint is made and\n33 tightened to manufacturer's standard. Retorque nuts after 4 hours.\n34 Gasket Lubricant\n35 Lubricant shall be supplied by pipe manufacturer and no substitute or \"or-equal\" will be allowed.\n36 Double Wall Containment Pipinq System\n37 As specified in Section 15021, HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) PIPE.\nAppendix 4D.279\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Flexible Hose\n2 Flexible hose required for connection of leachate pump discharge piping to crest pad piping manifold and\n3 at truck loading station shall be Royalflex, vinyl nitrile by Boston Industrial Products, or equal, rated at a\n4 minimum of 125 psi.\n5 A male and female quick-connect coupling shall be factory or shop installed on each length of flexible\n6 hose with stainless steel banding. 1-1/2-inch quick connect couplings for flexible hose and leachate pump\n7 discharge piping within the slope riser pipe shall be fiberglass-filled polypropylene, 3-inch quick connect\n8 couplings shall be stainless steel, each size shall include stainless steel rings, arms, and pins. Stainless\n9 steel quick connects shall have minimum pressure rating of 150 psig. Anti-galling compound shall be\n10 used for threaded stainless steel connections.\n11 Vent And Drain Valves\n12 Pipeline 2-Inch Diameter and Smaller: 1/2-inch vent, 1-inch drain, unless shown otherwise.\n13 Pipelines 2-1/2-Inch Diameter and Larger: 3/4-inch vent, 1-inch drain, unless shown otherwise.\n14 Fabrication\n15 Flanged pipe shall be fabricated in the shop, not in the field, and delivered to the site with flanges in place and\n16 properly faced. Threaded flanges shall be individually fitted and machine tightened on matching threaded pipe\n17 by the manufacturer.\n18 Finishes\n19 Factory prepare, prime, and finish coat in accordance with Pipe Data Sheet(s) and Piping Schedule.\n20 Galvanizing:\n21 Hot-dip applied, meeting requirements of ASTM A 153.\n22 Electroplated zinc or cadmium plating is unacceptable.\n23 Stainless steel components may be substituted where galvanizing is specified.\n24 Locator Ribbon\n25 As specified in Section 02320, TRENCH BACKFILL.\n26 Insulation\n27 Piping:\n28 Combined Sump (Discharge Piping Only) and Piping Requiring Heat Trace:\n29 Material: Flexible elastomeric pipe insulation, closed cell structure, 3/4 inch thick.\n30 Temperature Rating: Minus 40 degrees F to 180 degrees F.\n31 Nominal Density:\n32 6 pcf.\n33 Conductivity in accordance with ASHRAE 90.1 and minimum of 0.27 BTU-in/hr-ft2 degrees F at\n34 75 degrees F per ASTM C177 or ASTM C518.\n35 Minimum water vapor transmission of 0.10 perm-inch per ASTM E96.\n36 Seal joints with manufacturer's adhesive.\n37 Flame Spread Rating: Less than 25 per ASTM E84.\n38 Manufacturers and Products:\n39 Rubatex: R-180-FS.\nAppendix 4D.280\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Armstrong: Armaflex AP.\n2 Piping and Insulation Cover: Aluminum jacket 0.016-inch thick.\n3 Part 3 -Execution\n4 Examination\n5 Verify size, material, joint types, elevation, horizontal location, and pipe service of existing pipelines\n6 to be connected to new pipelines or new equipment.\n7 Inspect size and location of structure penetrations to verify adequacy of wall pipes, sleeves, and other\n8 openings.\n9 Preparation\n10 Inspect pipe and fittings before installation, clean ends thoroughly, and remove foreign matter and dirt\n11 from inside.\n12 Damaged Coatings and Linings: Repair using original coating and lining materials in accordance with\n13 manufacturer's instructions.\n14 Installation-General\n15 Join pipe and fittings in accordance with manufacturer's instructions, unless otherwise shown or\n16 specified.\n17 Remove foreign objects prior to assembly and installation.\n18 Flanged Joints: Install perpendicular to pipe centerline.\n19 Bolt Holes:\n20 Straddle vertical centerlines, aligned with connecting equipment flanges or as shown.\n21 Use torque-limiting wrenches to ensure uniform bearing and proper bolt tightness.\n22 Plastic Flanges: Install annular ring filler gasket at joints of raised-face flange.\n23 Raised-Face Flanges:\n24 Use flat-face flange when joining with flat-faced ductile or cast iron flange.\n25 Verify compatibility of mating flange to adapter flange gasket prior to selecting grooved adapter\n26 flanging.\n27 Threaded flanged joints must be shop fabricated and delivered tojobsite with flanges in-place and\n28 properly faced.\n29 Threaded and Coupled Joints:\n30 Conform with ANSI B 1.20.1.\n31 Produce sufficient thread length to ensure full engagement when screwed home in fittings.\n32 Countersink pipe ends, ream and clean chips and burrs after threading.\n33 Make connections with not more than three threads exposed.\n34 Lubricate male threads only with thread lubricant or tape as specified on Piping Data Sheets.\n35 High Density Polyethylene Piping: As specified in Section 15021, HIGH DENSITY\n36 POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) PIPE.\n37 Installation-Exposed Pipinq\n38 Piping Runs:\n39 Parallel to building or column lines and perpendicular to floor, unless shown otherwise.\nAppendix 4D.281\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Piping upstream and downstream of flow measuring devices shall provide straight lengths as required\n2 for accurate flow measurement.\n3 Group piping wherever practical at common elevations; install to conserve building space and not\n4 interfere with use of space and other work.\n5 Unions or Flanges: Provide at each piping connection to equipment or instrumentation on equipment\n6 side of each block valve to facilitate installation and removal.\n7 Install piping so that no load or movement in excess of that stipulated by equipment manufacturer\n8 will be imposed upon equipment connection; install to allow for contraction and expansion without\n9 stressing pipe, joints, or connected equipment.\n10 Piping Clearance (unless otherwise shown):\n11 Over Walkway and Stairs: Minimum of 7 feet 6 inches, measured from walking surface or stair tread to\n12 lowest extremity of piping system including flanges, valve bodies or mechanisms, insulation, or\n13 hanger/support systems.\n14 Between Equipment or Equipment Piping and Adjacent Piping: Minimum 3 feet 0 inches, measured\n15 from equipment extremity and extremity of piping system including flanges, valve bodies or mechanisms,\n16 insulation, or hanger/support systems.\n17 From Adjacent Work:\n18 Minimum 1 inch from nearest extremity of completed piping system including flanges, valve bodies or\n19 mechanisms, insulation, or hanger/support systems.\n20 Do not route piping in front of or to interfere with access ways, ladders, stairs, platforms, walkways,\n21 openings, doors, or windows.\n22 Head room in front of openings, doors, and windows shall not be less than the top of the opening.\n23 Do not install piping containing liquids or liquid vapors in transformer vaults.\n24 Do not route piping over, around, in front of, in back of, or below electrical equipment including\n25 controls, panels, switches, terminals, boxes, or other similar electrical work.\n26 Installation-Double Wall Containment Piping System\n27 Install as specified in Section 15021, HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) PIPE.\n28 Installation-Buried Pipe\n29 Placement: In accordance with Section 15021, HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) PIPE.\n30 Slab, Floor, Wall, and Roof Penetrations\n31 Application and Installation: As shown on Drawings.\n32 Wall Pipe Installation: Support wall pipes securely by framework to prevent contact with reinforcing\n33 steel and tie wires.\n34 Branch Connections\n35 Do not install branch connections smaller than 1/2-inch nominal pipe size, including instrument\n36 connections, unless shown otherwise.\n37 When line of lower pressure connects to a line of higher pressure, requirements of Piping Data Sheet for\n38 higher pressure rating prevails up to and including the first block valve in the line carrying the lower\n39 pressure, unless otherwise shown.\n40 Threaded Pipe Tap Connections:\n41 Welded Steel or Alloy Piping: Connect only with welded threadolet or half-coupling as specified on\n42 Piping Data Sheet.\nAppendix 4D.282\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Limitations: Threaded taps in pipe barrel are unacceptable.\n2 Cleaninq\n3 Following assembly and testing, and prior to final acceptance, flush pipelines (except as stated below)\n4 with water at 2.5 fps minimum flushing velocity until foreign matter is removed.\n5 The up-slope riser pipe and slotted pipe shall be cleaned internally after deburring by pulling cotton\n6 pillows attached to ropes through pipe repeatedly until no debris comes out of pipe with pillow.\n7 Water flushing shall not be permitted. Pipe ends shall be covered after fabrication and at the end of\n8 shifts to avoid foreign materials from entering pipe.\n9 If impractical to flush large diameter pipe at 2.5 fps, clean in-place from inside by brushing and\n10 sweeping, then flush or blow line at lower velocity.\n11 Insert cone strainers in flushing connections to attached equipment and leave in-place until cleaning is\n12 complete.\n13 Remove accumulated debris through drains 2 inches and larger or by removing spools and valves\n14 from piping.\n15 Field Finishing\n16 Notify Construction Manager at least 3 days prior to start of any surface preparation or coating\n17 application work.\n18 Locator Ribbon\n19 Locator ribbon shall be installed as specified in Section 02320, TRENCH BACKFILL.\n20 Pipe Identification\n21 Exposed Piping\n22 In general, all exposed piping shall be color coded and identified in accordance with ANSI A-13-1. It is\n23 the intent of this standard that the identification method of aboveground piping is by English text that\n24 allows the contents to be readily identified. Flow direction should be also shown by arrows.\n25 All piping and equipment shall be identified in accordance with established site standards.\n26 In addition to the requirements specified herein, all pipelines and standard equipment shall be color coded\n27 and identified with beaded chain or steel cable stainless steel tags displaying the pipe or equipment\n28 number as shown on the Drawings. The tags shall be fabricated from 300 series austenitic stainless steel\n29 metal strips 3/4 inch wide, 24-gauge minimum thickness, with 3/16-inch high letters stamped on the metal\n30 surface. Any pipes entering or leaving a building shall be tagged adjacent to floor or wall penetration.\n31 The tags shall be attached to the pipe or austenitic equipment with austenitic stainless steel bead chain or\n32 austenitic stainless steel cable. When tagging valves, the bead chain shall be attached to the valve stem or\n33 yoke.\n34 Construction Quality Control -Leakage Testing\n35 As specified in Section 15992, PIPING LEAKAGE TESTING.\n36 Supplements\n37 Supplement 1-Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Pipe and Fittings.\n38 Supplement 2-Galvanized Steel Pipe and Malleable Iron Fittings.\n39 Supplement 3-Piping Schedule.\n40 END OF SECTION 1506\n41\n42\nAppendix 4D.283\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nPolyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Pipe & Fittings\nItem Size Description\nPipe All Schedule 80 PVC: Type I, Grade I or Class 12454-B conforming to\nASTM D1784 and ASTM D1785. Pipe shall be manufactured with\n2 percent titanium dioxide for ultraviolet protection.\nThreaded Nipples: Schedule 80 PVC.\nFittings All Schedule to Match Pipe Above: ASTM D2466 and ASTM D2467 for\nsocket-weld type and Schedule 80 ASTM D2464 for threaded type.\nFittings shall be manufactured with 2 percent titanium dioxide for\nultraviolet protection.\nJoints All Solvent socket-weld except where connection to threaded valves and\nequipment may require future disassembly.\nFlanges All One piece, molded hub type PVC flat face flange in accordance with\nFittings above, 125-pound ANSI B16.1 drilling\nBolting All ASTM Al93/Al93M Type 316 stainless steel Grade B8M hex head\nbolts and ASTM A194/ Al94M Grade 8M hex head nuts.\nGaskets All Flat Face Mating Flange: Full faced 1/8-inch thick ethylene propylene\n(EPR) rubber.\nRaised Face Mating Flange: Flat ring 1/8-inch ethylene propylene (EPR)\nrubber, with filler gasket between OD of raised face and flange OD to\nprotect the flange from bolting moment.\nSolvent Cement All As recommended by the pipe and fitting manufacturer conforming to\nASTM D2564.\nThread Lubricant All Teflon Tape.\n2\n3\nAppendix 4D.284\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nGalvanized Steel Pipe & Malleable Iron Fittings\nItem Size Description\nPipe Galvanized carbon steel, ASTM A 106, Grade B seamless or\nASTM A53, Grade B seamless or ERW.\n2\" and smaller Schedule 80.\n2-1/2\" through 6\" Schedule 40.\nJoints All Threaded or flanged at valves and equipment.\nFittings Threaded: 150- or 300-pound galvanized malleable iron,\nASTM A197 or ASTM A47, dimensions in accordance with\nANSI B16.3.\nFlanges Galvanized forged carbon steel, ASTM A105/AI05M,\nANSI B16.5 Class 150 or Class 300, threaded, 1/16-inch raised\nface.\nUnions Threaded malleable iron, ASTM A197 or A47, 300-pound\nWOG, brass to iron seat, meeting the requirements of\nANSI B16.3.\nBolting Flanges: Carbon steel ASTM A307, Grade A hex head bolts\nand ASTM A563, Grade A hex head nuts.\nGaskets All flanges Flanged, Water and Sewage Service: 1/8 inch thick, red rubber\n(SBR), hardness 80 (Shore A), rated to 200 degrees F,\nconforming to ANSI B 16.21, AWWA C207, and\nASTM D1330, Grades 1 and 2.\nThread 2\" & smaller Teflon tape or joint compound that is insoluble in water.\nLubricant\n2\n3\nAppendix 4D.285\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nPiping Schedule Legend\nService Code\nLH Leachate Handling\nLHCP Leachate Handling Containment Pipe\nLT Leachate Transfer\nLTCP Leachate Transfer Containment Pipe\nService\nCPB Crest Pad Building\nCS Combined Sump\nIC In-Cell\nLTB Leachate Transfer Building\nOC Outside-Cell\nTL Truck Loading\nExposure\nBUR Buried\nEXP Exposed\nSUB Submerged\nMaterial\nGSP Galvanized Steel Pipe\nHDPE High Density Polyethylene\nPVC Polyvinyl Chloride\nPressure Test\nH Hydrostatic\nP Pneumatic\nNA Not Applicable\nJoint Type\nBF Butt Fused\nFL Flanged\nSW Solvent Weld\nTH Threaded\nQC Quick Connect\n2\n3\nAppendix 4D.286\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nPiping Schedule\nService Size(s) Piping Joint Specificati Test Test Pressure\nCode Service (In.) Exposure Material Type on Section Type (psi)1 Remarks\nLH IC All BUR HDPE BF, QC 15021 H 65* LCRS-Low\nFlow\n100* LCRS-High SDR 11\nFlow\n65* LDS\nLHCP IC 3\" BUR HDPE BF 15021 P 8 SDR 11, slotted\nportion of pipe\nnot to be tested\nLHCP IC 12\" & BUR HDPE BF 15021 P 8 SDR 17, slotted\n18\" portion of pipe\nnot to be tested\nLH CPB All EXP PVC SW, FL, 15060 H 75 SCHD 80\nCS TH\nLH OC 3\" BUR HDPE BF 15021 H 65, except 75 for LH- SDR 11\n30 and LH-24\nLT\nLH OC 4\" BUR HDPE BF 15021 H 65 SDR 17\nLT\nLHCP OC 2\" BUR HDPE BF 15021 P 8 SDR 1 Ifor all\nexcept SDR 9 for\nLTCP 219A(E)201-2\"-\nLTCP-043-HDPE\nLHCP OC 6\" & 8\" BUR HDPE BF 15021 P 8 SDR 17\nLTCP\nLT LTB All EXP PVC SW, FL, 15060 H 75 SCHD 80\nTH\nLT TL All EXP GSP FL, TH 15060 H 65, except 75 for LT- SCHD 40\n37\n*Test pressures measured at Crest Pad Building. Isolate any appurtenances not rated for test pressure such as vacuum breakers and pressure\ngages.\nNotes: 1. Test pressures shown are for a minimum allowable pressure. Maximum test pressures cannot exceed pressure rating of the pipe\nduring the expansion phase of the pressure test.\n2\nAppendix 4D.287\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 15100 -VALVES, OPERATORS, AND FILTER SCHED. A & B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 Summary\n4 This section is for furnishing and installing valves, filters, and associated components for leachate and\n5 raw water systems. Valves and accessories for raw water are identified as such. Other requirements\n6 apply to leachate and raw water systems.\n7 References\n8 The following is a list of standards, which may be referenced in this section:\n9 AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANSI)\n10 ANSI B 16.1 Cast Iron Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings\n11 AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION (AWWA)\n12 AWWA C509 Resilient-Seated Gate Valves for Water and Sewerage Systems\n13 AWWA C550 Protective Epoxy Interior Coatings for Valves and Hydrants\n14 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n15 ASTM A276 Standard Specification for Stainless and Heat-Resisting Steel Bars and Shapes\n16 ASTM A351 Standard Specification for Castings, Austenitic, Austenitic-Ferric (Duplex), for\n17 Pressure-Containing Parts\n18 ASTM B61 Standard Specification for Steam or Valve Bronze Castings\n19 ASTM B62 Standard Specification for Composition Bronze or Ounce Metal Castings\n20 ASTM B98 Standard Specification for Copper-Silicon Alloy Rod, Bar, and Shapes\n21 ASTM B 127 Standard Specification for Nickel-Copper Alloy (UNS N04400) Plate, Sheet, and\n22 Strip\n23 ASTM B139 Standard Specification for Phosphor Bronze Rod, Bar, and Shapes\n24 ASTM B164 Standard Specification for Nickel-Copper Alloy Rod, Bar, and Wire\n25 ASTM B 194 Standard Specification for Copper-Beryllium Alloy Plate, Sheet, Strip, and\n26 Rolled Bar\n27 ASTM B584 Standard Specification for Copper Alloy Sand Castings for General Applications\n28 ASTM D429 Test Methods for Rubber Property-Adhesion to Rigid Substrates\n29 ASTM D1784 Standard Specification for Rigid Poly(Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Compounds and\n30 Chlorinated Poly( Vinyl Chloride) (CPVC) Compounds\n31 Submiftals-ApprovaI Required\n32 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n33 Shop Drawings:\n34 Product data sheets for make and model.\n35 Complete catalog information, descriptive literature, specifications, and identification of materials of\n36 construction.\n37 Manufacturer's Certificate of Compliance for butterfly valves; full compliance with AWWA C504.\nAppendix 4D.288\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Submittals-Approval Not Required:\n2 Information/Record (IR): Documentation of construction quality control testing as specified herein.\n3 Part 2 -Products\n4 General\n5 Valve to include operator, actuator, hand wheel, chain wheel, extension stem, floor stand, worm and\n6 gear operator, operating nut, chain, wrench, and accessories for a complete operation.\n7 Valve to be suitable for intended service. Renewable parts not to be of a lower quality than specified.\n8 Valve same size as adjoining pipe.\n9 Valve ends to suit adjacent piping.\n10 Size operator to operate valve for the full range of pressures and velocities.\n11 Valve to open by turning counterclockwise.\n12 Factory mount operator, actuator, and accessories.\n13 Provide nametag for each valve. Nametag shall include valve tag number and be constructed of 16-\n14 Gauge Type 304 stainless steel, letters shall be 3/16-inch imposed, affix to valve with 16- or 18-\n15 gauge stainless steel wire.\n16 Materials\n17 Brass and bronze valve components and accessories that have surfaces in contact with liquids other than\n18 leachate to be alloys containing less than 16 percent zinc and 2 percent aluminum. Valves in service on\n19 leachate lines shall have no bronze, brass, or copper wetted parts.\n20 Approved alloys are of the following ASTM designations:\n21 B61, B62, B98 (Alloy UNS No. C65100, C65500, or C66100), B139 (Alloy UNS No. C51000),\n22 B584 (Alloy UNS No. C90300 or C94700), B164, B194, and B127.\n23 Stainless steel Alloy 18-8 may be substituted for bronze.\n24 Factory Finishing\n25 Exposed Valves:\n26 Manufacturer's standard corrosion-resistant coating suitable for intended service.\n27 Safety isolation valves and lockout valves with handles, hand wheels, or chain wheels \"safety\n28 yellow.\"\n29 Epoxy Lining and Coating:\n30 Use where specified for individual valves described herein.\n31 In accordance with AWWA C550 unless otherwise specified.\n32 Either two-part liquid material or heat-activated (fusion) material except only heat-activated material\n33 if specified as \"fusion\" or \"fusion bonded\" epoxy.\n34 Minimum 7-mil dry film thickness except where limited by valve operating tolerances.\n35 Valves\n36 Ball Valves\n37 Type V330 PVC Ball Valve 2 Inches and Smaller: Rated 150 psi at 73 degrees F, with ASTM D1784,\n38 Type I, Grade 1 polyvinyl chloride body, ball, and stem, end entry, double union design, solvent-weld\n39 socket ends, elastomer seat, Viton or Teflon O-ring stem seals, to block flow in both directions.\nAppendix 4D.289\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Manufacturers and Products:\n2 Nibco; True-Bloc.\n3 ASAHI America; Duo-Bloc.\n4 Or approved equal.\n5 Type V331 PVC Ball Valve 3 and 4 Inches: Rated 150 psi at 73 degrees F, with ASTM D1784 Type I,\n6 Grade 1 polyvinyl chloride full port body, Teflon seat, Viton O-ring stem, face and carrier seals, end entry\n7 design with dual union, solvent-weld socket ends, or single union ball valve with flanged ends drilled to\n8 ANSIB16.1.\n9 Manufacturers and Products:\n10 Nibco.\n11 ASAHI America.\n12 Or approved equal.\n13 PVC 3-Way Ball Valve 2 Inches and Larger: Valves shall be three-way type with port option\n14 necessary to either direct flow through leachate filter or bypass flow around leachate filter. Valve\n15 configuration shall allow filter replacement simultaneously with flow through filter bypass. Rated 150 psi\n16 at 73 degrees F, with ASTM D1784, Type I, Grade 1 polyvinyl chloride body, ball, and stem, double\n17 union design, solvent weld socket ends, or flanged ends drilled to ASME B 16.5, Class 150, elastomer\n18 seat, Viton or Teflon O-ring stem seals, full ported ball.\n19 Manufacturers and Products:\n20 Spears; True Union 2000.\n21 Or approved equal.\n22 Check and Flap Valve:\n23 Type V609 PVC Self-Closing Check Valve 3 Inches and Smaller: ASTM D1784, Type I, Grade 1,\n24 PVC body, rated at 150 psi, Viton seats and seals, stainless steel spring.\n25 Manufacturer and Product:\n26 PLAST-O-MATIC; Series CKS.\n27 PVC Swing Check Valve 4 Inch and Larger:\n28 PVC body, flanged, rated at 150 psi at 70 degrees F minimum, EPDM elastomer seal.\n29 Manufacturers and Product:\n30 Hayward Model 5167.040\n31 Self-Contained Automatic Valves:\n32 Air Release Valve 1/2 Inch to 16 Inches:\n33 1/2-inch through 3-inch NPT inlets and outlets, 4 inch and larger ANSI B 16.1 flanged inlet with plain\n34 outlet and protective hoods.\n35 Rated 150 psi working pressure, PVC body, EPDM seals.\n36 Manufacturer and Product: IPEX; Series VAFV.\n37 Vacuum Breaker Valve: 1/2-inch NPT inlet and outlet, PVC body, EPDM diaphragm, working pressure\n38 100 psi.\n39 Manufacturer and Product: PLAST-O-MATIC; Series VBM.\nAppendix 4D.290\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Gate Valves:\n2 Type V100 Gate Valve 3 Inches and Smaller (Raw Water): All-bronze, screwed bonnet, single solid\n3 wedge gate, nonrising stem, rated 125-pound SWP, 200-pound WOG.\n4 Manufacturers and Products:\n5 Stockham; B 103, threaded end.\n6 Crane; 438, threaded end.\n7 Type V130 Resilient Seated Gate Valve, 2 Inches to 12 Inches (Combined Sump and Truck Loading\n8 Station):\n9 Iron body, resilient seat, bronze mounted, ANSI Class 125 flanged ends, nonrising stem in\n10 accordance with AWWA C509, design working water pressure 200 psig for 2 inches through 12\n11 inches, full port, fusion-epoxy coated inside and outside per AWWA C550.\n12 Provide 2-inch operating nut and operator extensions for the gate valves on the secondary\n13 containment piping that drains into the combined sump. Provide handwheel operators for the gate\n14 valves at the truck loading station.\n15 Manufacturers and Products:\n16 M&H Valve; AWWA C509.\n17 U.S. Pipe; Metroseal.\n18 Type V130 Resilient Seated Gate Valve, 4 Inches to 12 Inches (Raw Water):\n19 Iron body, resilient seat, bronze mounted, ANSI Class 125 flanged ends, nonrising stem in\n20 accordance with AWWA C509, design working water pressure 200 psig for 2 inches through 12\n21 inches, full port, fusion-epoxy coated inside and outside per AWWA C550.\n22 Provide post indicating assembly with detachable crank handle for 12-inch gate valve at raw water\n23 tie-in.\n24 Manufacturers and Products:\n25 U.S. Pipe; Metroseal.\n26 Clow Corp; Model F-6 lXX.\n27 Butterfly Valves:\n28 General:\n29 Valves specified as AWWA C504 to be in full compliance with AWWA C504 and following\n30 requirements:\n31 Suitable for throttling operations and infrequent operation after periods of inactivity.\n32 Elastomer seats, which are bonded or vulcanized to the body, shall have adhesive integrity of bond\n33 between seat and body assured by testing, with minimum 75-pound pull in accordance with\n34 ASTM D429, Method B.\n35 Bubble-tight with rated pressure applied from either side.\n36 No travel stops for disc on interior of body.\n37 Self-adjusting V-type or O-ring shaft seals.\n38 Isolate metal-to-metal thrust bearing surfaces from flowstream.\n39 Valve actuators to meet the requirements of AWWA C504.\nAppendix 4D.291\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Type V530 Butterfly Valve 4 Inches to 24 Inches for Fire Protection Service (Raw Water):\n2 UL Listed and FM Approved, flanged style, AWWA C504 Class 150B valve with cast iron body,\n3 aluminum-bronze disc, stainless steel stem, EPDM seat, geared operator with highly visible position\n4 indicator and detachable crank handle.\n5 For buried service, provide post indicating assembly with detachable crank handle.\n6 Manufacturers and Product: Pratt; PIVA.\n7 Miscellaneous Valves:\n8 Type V930 Fire Hydrant (Raw Water): Hydrants shall be dry-barrel type conforming to AWWA C502\n9 with valve opening at least 5 inches in diameter and designed so that the flange at the main valve seat can\n10 be removed with the main valve seat apparatus remaining intact, closed, and reasonably tight against\n11 leakage and with a breakable valve rod coupling and breakable flange connections located no more than\n12 8 inches above the ground grade. Hydrants shall have a 6-inch bell connection, two 2-1/2-inch hose\n13 connections, and one 4-1/2-inch pumper connection. Outlets shall have American National Standard\n14 fire-hose coupling threads. Working parts shall be bronze. Design, material, and workmanship shall be\n15 similar and equal to the latest stock pattern ordinarily produced by the manufacturer. Hydrants shall be\n16 painted with one coat of red iron oxide, zinc oxide primer conforming to SSPC Paint 25, and two finish\n17 coats of silicone alkyd paint conforming to SSPC Paint 21; color shall be safety yellow. Caps and chains\n18 shall be furnished.\n19 Manufacturers and Products: Clow Medallion.\n20 Type V931 Yard Hydrant (Raw Water): Non-freeze yard hydrant with 3/4-inch hose connection.\n21 Constructed of manufacturer's standard materials, rated for minimum pressure of 125 psi.\n22 Manufacturers and Products: Wade 8610; or equal.\n23 Accessories\n24 Operating Wrenches (Raw Water): Two each T-handled galvanized operating wrenches for 2-inch\n25 square nut operator, 6 feet long.\n26 Manufacturers and Products:\n27 Mueller; No. A-24610.\n28 Clow No.; F-2520.\n29 Two each T-handled galvanized forked operating keys for cross handled valves, 7 feet long.\n30 Cast Iron Valve Box (Raw Water): Designed for traffic loads, sliding type, with minimum of 6-inch ID\n31 shaft.\n32 Box: Cast iron with minimum depth of 9 inches.\n33 Lid: Cast iron, minimum depth 3 inches, marked WATER.\n34 Extensions: Cast iron.\n35 Operators\n36 Manual Operator:\n37 General:\n38 Operator force not to exceed 40 pounds under any operating condition, including initial breakaway.\n39 Gear reduction operator when force exceeds 40 pounds.\n40 Operator self-locking type or equipped with self-locking device.\n41 Position indicator on quarter-turn valves.\nAppendix 4D.292\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Worm and gear operators one-piece design worm-gears of gear bronze material. Worm hardened\n2 alloy steel with thread ground and polished. Traveling nut type operators threader steel reach rods\n3 with internally threaded bronze or ductile iron nut.\n4 Exposed Operator:\n5 Galvanized and painted hand wheels.\n6 Lever operators allowed on quarter-turn valves 8 inches and smaller.\n7 Valve handles to take a padlock, and wheels a chain and padlock.\n8 Buried Operator:\n9 Buried service operators on valves larger than 2-1/2 inches shall have a 2-inch AWWA operating nut.\n10 Buried operators on valves 2 inches and smaller shall have cross handle for operation by forked key.\n11 Enclose moving parts of valve and operator in housing to prevent contact with the soil.\n12 Design buried service operators for quarter-turn valves to withstand 450 foot-pounds of input torque\n13 at the FULLY OPEN or FULLY CLOSED positions, grease packed and gasketed to withstand a\n14 submersion in water to 10 psi.\n15 Buried valves shall have extension stems, bonnets, and valve boxes.\n16 Leachate Filters\n17 Stainless steel filter housings rated for 150 psi minimum at 120 degrees F and 160 gpm shall be installed\n18 as shown on the piping details. Each filter housing shall be installed with (12) 5 micron filter cartridges,\n19 each cartridge shall be 40 inches long. The filter housing shall have a mill finish and include installation\n20 of a vent valve with drain tubing, drain valves with drain tubing, and filter housing stand. The filter\n21 assembly shall have no more than a 10 psi pressure drop across the housing and clean filter cartridges\n22 when operating at 160 gpm of water flow. The filter inlet and outlets shall be ASME B 16.5, Class 150\n23 flanges. Furnish and install filter cartridges within filter housing, in addition provide a minimum of 72\n24 additional filter cartridges for future filter changeouts.\n25 The filter assembly shall include a wall mounted differential pressure indicator. The differential pressure\n26 indicator shall tie-in to the filter housing drain ports. The differential pressure indicator shall include a\n27 resettable drag pointer for indication of maximum differential pressure achieved, 4.5-inch dial, and a\n28 range of 0-15 psid.\n29 Copper tubing shall be used for differential pressure indicator. Tubing shall be 1/4-inch seamless copper\n30 tubing conforming to ASTM B75. Wall thickness, diameter tolerances, and compression type brass\n31 fittings shall be in accordance with ASTM B25 1.\n32 Manufacturers and Products:\n33 Filter Assembly: GE Osmonics; NDV Series w/Hytrex Filter Cartridges (5 micron, 40-inch length).\n34 Differential Pressure Indicator: Wika; 700.05.\n35 Part 3 -Execution\n36 Installation\n37 Flange Ends:\n38 Flanged valve boltholes shall straddle vertical centerline of pipe.\n39 Clean flanged faces, insert gasket and bolts, and tighten nuts progressively and uniformly; do not over\n40 tighten.\n41 Screwed Ends:\n42 Clean threads by wire brushing or swabbing.\nAppendix 4D.293\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Apply joint compound.\n2 Valve Orientation:\n3 Install operating stem vertical when valve is installed in horizontal runs of pipe having centerline\n4 elevations 4 feet 6 inches or less above finished floor, unless otherwise shown.\n5 Install operating stem horizontal in horizontal runs of pipe having centerline elevations between 4 feet\n6 6 inches and 6 feet 9 inches above finish floor, unless otherwise shown.\n7 Install a line size ball valve and union upstream of each solenoid valve, in-line flow switch, or other\n8 in-line electrical device, excluding magnetic flowmeters, for isolation during maintenance.\n9 Locate valve to provide accessibility for control and maintenance. Install access doors in finished\n10 walls and plaster ceilings for valve access.\n11 Construction Quality Control\n12 Valves shall be tested prior to leak testing pipelines.\n13 Construction General Contractor shall perform test that valves open and close smoothly.\n14 Construction General Contractor shall count and record number of turns to open and close valve;\n15 account for any discrepancies with manufacturer's data.\n16 END OF SECTION 15100\nAppendix 4D.294\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 15140 -PIPING SUPPORT SYSTEMS SCHED. B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 Summary\n4 This section is for furnishing and installing leachate piping support systems.\n5 References\n6 The following is a list of standards, which may be referenced in this section:\n7 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n8 ASTM A525 Standard Specification for General Requirements for Steel Sheet, Zinc-Coated\n9 (Galvanized) by the Hot-Dip Process\n10 BUILDING OFFICIALS AND CODE ADMINISTRATORS (BOCA)\n11 Basic Building Code\n12 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF BUILDING OFFICIALS (ICBO)\n13 Uniform Building Code\n14 MANUFACTURERS' STANDARDIZATION SOCIETY (MSS)\n15 SP 58 Pipe Hangers and Supports-Materials, Design and Manufacture\n16 SP 69 Pipe Hangers and Supports-Selection and Application\n17 SP 89 Pipe Hangers and Supports-Fabrication and Installation\n18 Submittals-Approval Required\n19 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n20 Shop Drawings:\n21 Drawings of each piping support system to scale shown, locating each support, brace, hanger, guide,\n22 component, and anchor. Identify support, hanger, guide, and anchor type by catalog number and shop\n23 drawing detail number.\n24 Revisions to support systems resulting from changes in related piping system layout or addition of\n25 flexible joints.\n26 Definitions\n27 Ferrous Metal: Iron, steel, stainless steel, and alloys with iron as principal component.\n28 Wetted or Submerged: Submerged, less than 1 foot above liquid surface, below top of channel wall,\n29 under cover or slab of channel or tank, or in other damp locations.\n30 Desiqn Requirements\n31 General:\n32 Piping Smaller than 30 Inches: Supports are shown only where specific types and locations are\n33 required; additional pipe supports may be required.\n34 Meet requirements of MSS SP 58, MSS SP 69, and MSS SP 89.\n35 Pipe Support Systems:\n36 Support Load: Dead loads imposed by weight of pipes filled with water, except air and gas pipes, plus\n37 insulation.\n38 Seismic Load: Seismic performance category forces with seismic loads in accordance with local codes.\nAppendix 4D.295\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Safety Factor: Minimum of 5.\n2 Maximum Support Spacing and Minimum Rod Size:\n3 Steel or Ductile Iron Piping:\nMaximum Support/ Minimum Rod\nPipe Size Size Single Rod\nHanger Spacing Hangers\n1-inch and smaller 6 feet 1/4-inch\n1-1/2-inch thru 2-1/2-inch 8 feet 1/4-inch\n3-inch and 4-inch 10 feet 3/8-inch\n4 Plastic and Fiberglass Piping:\n5 Maximum Support Spacing: As recommended by manufacturer for flow temperature in pipe. Pipe\n6 insulation shall be included in the selection of maximum pipe support spacing.\n7 Minimum Hanger Rod Sizing: Same as listed for steel pipe.\n8 Framing Support System:\n9 Beams: Size such that beam stress does not exceed 25,000 psi and maximum deflection does not exceed\n10 1/240 of span.\n11 Column Members: Size in accordance with manufacturer's recommended method.\n12 Support Loads: Calculate using weight of pipes filled with water.\n13 Maximum Spans:\n14 Steel and Ductile Iron Pipe, 3-Inch Diameter and Larger: 10-foot centers, unless otherwise shown.\n15 Other Pipelines and Special Situations: May require supplementary hangers and supports.\n16 Electrical Conduit Support: Include in design of framing support system.\n17 Anchoring Devices: Design, size, and space support anchoring devices, including anchor bolts, inserts,\n18 and other devices used to anchor support, to withstand shear and pullout loads imposed by loading and\n19 spacing on each particular support.\n20 Vertical Sway Bracing: 10-foot maximum centers, or as shown.\n21 Part 2 -Products\n22 General\n23 When specified items are not available, fabricate pipe supports of correct material and to general\n24 configuration indicated by catalogs.\n25 Special support and hanger details are shown for cases where standard catalog supports are inapplicable.\n26 Materials:\n27 Wetted and Submerged: Stainless steel.\n28 Atmospheric Exposed: Galvanized or painted steel.\nAppendix 4D.296\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Hanqers\n2 Clevis Type:\n3 MSS SP 58, Type 1 or 6.\n4 Grinnell; Figure 104 or 260.\n5 B-Line; Figure B3198 or B3100.\n6 Hinged Split-Ring Pipe Clamp:\n7 MSS SP 58, Type 6 or 12.\n8 Grinnell; Figure 104.\n9 B-Line; Figure B3198H.\n10 Hanger Rods, Clevises, Nuts, Sockets, and Turnbuckles: In accordance with MSS SP 58.\n11 Attachments:\n12 I-Beam Clamp: Concentric loading type, MSS SP 58, Type 21, 28, 29, or 30, which engage both sides\n13 of flange.\n14 Concrete Insert: MSS SP 58, Type 18, continuous channel insert with load rating not less than that of\n15 hanger rod it supports.\n16 Saddle Supports\n17 Pedestal Type: Schedule 40 pipe stanchion, saddle, and anchoring flange.\n18 Nonadjustable Saddle:\n19 MSS SP 58, Type 37 with U-bolt.\n20 Grinnell; Figure 259.\n21 B-Line; Figure B3090.\n22 Adjustable Saddle:\n23 MSS SP 58, Type 38 without clamp.\n24 Grinnell; Figure 264.\n25 B-Line; Figure B3093.\n26 Wall Brackets\n27 Welded Steel Bracket:\n28 MSS SP 58, Type 33 (heavy-duty).\n29 Grinnell; Figure 199.\n30 B-Line; Figure B3607.\n31 One-Hole Clamp: Grinnell; Figure 126.\n32 Channel Type:\n33 Unistrut.\n34 Kin-Line.\n35 Pipe Clamps\n36 Riser Clamp:\n37 MSS SP 58, Type 8.\n38 Grinnell; Figure 261.\n39 B-Line; Figure B3373 or approved equal.\nAppendix 4D.297\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Channel Type Support Systems\n2 Material:\n3 Galvanized: Pre-galvanized in accordance with ASTM A525, Class G90, or hot-dip galvanized after\n4 fabrication.\n5 Stainless Steel: Type 304 stainless steel.\n6 Channel Size: 12-gauge, 1-5/8-inch wide series minimum.\n7 Members and Connections: Design for all loads with safety factor of 5.\n8 Manufacturers and Products:\n9 Kin-Line; Series C13812.\n10 Unistrut; Series P3200.\n11 B-Line; B2000 Series, or approved equal.\n12 Anchoring Systems\n13 Material:\n14 Wetted and Submerged: Stainless steel.\n15 Atmospheric Exposed: Galvanized.\n16 Size: Sized by equipment manufacturer, 1/2-inch minimum diameter.\n17 Shop/Factory Finishinq\n18 Prepare, prime, and finish coat in accordance with:\n19 Surface preparation with abrasive blast or centrifugal wheel blast (SPl0).\n20 Paint with:\n21 One coat, 2.5 minimum dry film thickness (MDFT) of Epolon rust inhibitor primer.\n22 One coat, 2.5 MDFT Epolon Multi-Mill Epoxy.\n23 One coat, 1.5 MDFT Acrolon II, No. 2200 Series.\n24 Part 3 -Execution\n25 Installation\n26 General:\n27 Install support systems in accordance with MSS SP 69, Pipe Hangers and Supports-Selection and\n28 Application and MSS SP 89, Pipe Hangers and Supports-Fabrication and Installation, unless shown\n29 otherwise.\n30 Support piping connections to equipment by pipe support and not by the equipment.\n31 Support large or heavy valves, fittings, and appurtenances independently of connected piping.\n32 Support no pipe from the pipe above it.\n33 Support pipe at changes in direction or in elevation, adjacent to flexible joints and couplings, and\n34 where shown.\n35 Do not install pipe supports and hangers in equipment access areas or bridge crane runs.\n36 Brace hanging pipes against horizontal movement by both longitudinal and lateral sway bracing.\n37 Install lateral supports for seismic loads at all changes in direction.\n38 Repair mounting surfaces to original condition after attachments are made.\nAppendix 4D.298\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Standard Pipe Supports:\n2 Horizontal Suspended Piping:\n3 Single Pipes: Adjustable swivel-ring, splint-ring, or clevis hangers.\n4 Grouped Pipes:\n5 Trapeze hanger systems.\n6 Furnish galvanized steel protection shield and oversized hangers for all insulated pipe.\n7 Furnish precut sections of rigid insulation with vapor barrier at hangers for all insulated pipe.\n8 Horizontal Piping Supported From Walls:\n9 Single Pipes: Wall brackets or wall clips attached to wall with anchors. Clips attached to wall mounted\n10 framing also acceptable.\n11 Stacked Piping:\n12 Wall-mounted framing system and clips acceptable for piping smaller than 3-inch minimal diameter.\n13 Piping clamps, which resist axial movement of pipe through support not acceptable.\n14 Wall-mounted piping clips not acceptable for insulated piping.\n15 Horizontal Piping Supported From Floors:\n16 Stanchion Type:\n17 Pedestal type; adjustable with stanchion, saddle, and anchoring flange.\n18 Use yoked saddles for piping whose centerline elevation is 18 inches or greater above the floor and\n19 for all exterior installations.\n20 Floor Mounted Channel Supports:\n21 Use for piping smaller than 3-inch nominal diameter running along floors and in trenches at piping\n22 elevations lower than can be accommodated using pedestal pipe supports.\n23 Attach channel framing to floors with anchor bolts.\n24 Attach pipe to channel with clips or pipe clamps.\n25 Vertical Pipe: Support with wall brackets and base elbow or riser clamps on floor penetrations.\n26 Standard Attachments:\n27 To Steel Beams: I-beam clamp or welded attachments.\n28 To Concrete Walls: Concrete inserts or brackets or clip angles with anchor bolts.\n29 Field Finishing\n30 Paint atmospheric exposed surfaces of black and hot-dip galvanized steel components as specified in\n31 Article SHOP/FACTORY FINISHING.\n32 END OF SECTION 15140\nAppendix 4D.299\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI SECTION 15500 -HEATING, VENTILATING, AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS\n2 SCHED. B\n3 Part 1 -General\n4 References\n5 The following is a list of standards, which may be referenced in this section:\n6 AIR MOVING AND CONDITIONING ASSOCIATION (AMCA)\n7 AMCA 99 Air Movement and Control Association Standards Handbook\n8 AMCA 210 Laboratory Methods of Testing Fans for Aerodynamic Performance Rating\n9 AMCA 300 Reverberant Room Method for Sound Testing of Fans\n10 AMCA 2401 Impeller Diameters and Outlet Areas for Centrifugal Fans and Metric\n11 Equivalents\n12 AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANSI)\n13 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEATING, REFRIGERATING AND\n14 AIR-CONDITIONING ENGINEERS (ASHRAE)\n15 ASHRAE 52 Method of Testing Air-Cleaning Devices Used in General Ventilation for\n16 Removing Particulate Matter\n17 ASHRAE 90A Energy Conservation in New Building Design\n18 INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS (IEEE)\n19 IEEE 112 Standard Test Procedure for Polyphase Induction Motors and Generators\n20 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION (NEMA)\n21 NEMA MG 1- Motors and Generators\n22 SHEET METAL AND AIR CONDITIONING CONTRACTORS'\n23 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (SMACNA)\n24 Guidelines for Seismic Restraints of Mechanical Systems\n25 HVAC Testing, Adjusting, and Balancing Manual\n26 UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES INC. (UL)\n27 Submittals-Approval Required\n28 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n29 Shop Drawings:\n30 Complete specifications, descriptive drawings, catalog cuts, and descriptive literature that include\n31 make, model, dimensions, weight of equipment, and electrical schematics for the following products:\n32 Air conditioning units.\n33 Unit heaters.\n34 Motorized dampers.\n35 Complete performance data that indicate full compliance with the Specifications.\n36 Recommended procedures for protection and handling of equipment and materials prior to\n37 installation.\nAppendix 4D.300\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Manufacturer's certification of factory testing to establish conformance with specified requirements\n2 for the unit heater and air conditioning unit.\n3 For motors specified to be energy efficient type, certified copy of test report for identical motor\n4 tested, in accordance with NEMA MG 1-12.53a and IEEE Standard 112, Test Method B, showing full\n5 load efficiency.\n6 Detailed information on structural, mechanical, electrical, or other modifications necessary to adapt\n7 the arrangement or details shown to the equipment furnished.\n8 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n9 Information/Record (IR):\n10 List of recommended spare parts for equipment and materials specified.\n11 Manufacturer's warranty.\n12 Operations and maintenance manuals including recommended preventative maintenance tasks and\n13 frequencies for performance of those tasks.\n14 Extra Materials\n15 Furnish, tag, and box for shipment and storage the following spare parts:\n16 Filters: Four complete sets per unit.\n17 Special Guarantee\n18 Manufacturer shall provide standard warranty.\n19 Part 2 -Products\n20 General:\n21 Heating Equipment: Minimum operating efficiencies as specified in Chapter 6 of ASHRAE\n22 Standard 90A, and the State of Washington Energy Code.\n23 Wall-Mounted Air-Cooled Packaged Air Conditioning Units (For Equipment Identification\n24 Numbers See Supplement)\n25 General:\n26 Packaged through-the-wall air conditioning unit.\n27 Cooling section.\n28 Heating section.\n29 Controls.\n30 Fans.\n31 Filters.\n32 All contained in a standard weatherproof enclosure.\n33 UL listed.\n34 Enclosure:\n35 Zinc-coated steel finished with manufacturer's standard baked enamel paint.\n36 Adjustable discharge grille.\n37 Return grille.\n38 Permanent filter.\n39 Internal sound attenuation.\n40 Controls with adjustable thermostat.\nAppendix 4D.301\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Fan speed switch with HIGH/LOW manual selections.\n2 Heating Section:\n3 Low-density electric heating elements.\n4 Built-in overheat protection.\n5 Cooling Section:\n6 Hermetic compressor.\n7 Air-cooled condenser coil.\n8 Evaporator coil.\n9 Drain pan with drain line connections.\n10 Direct-drive evaporator.\n11 Condenser fans.\n12 Fan motors with integral overload protection.\n13 Operating and safety controls.\n14 Operating charges of refrigerant and oil.\n15 Capacity (219A-LH-AC-001 and 219E-LH-AC-001): 600 cfm at fan medium speed, at 0.3 inch of\n16 water column static pressure, minimum outside air 100 cfm, cooling capacity 25,110 Btuh total,\n17 17,530 Btuh sensible, 85/72 degrees F DB/WB entering air temperature, and 100 degrees F ambient,\n18 208-volt, single-phase power supply, MCA17, breaker size 20 amps.\n19 Capacity (219Al-LH-AC-002 and 219E1-LH-AC-002): 360 cfm at 0.3 inch of water column static\n20 pressure, minimum outside air 100 cfm, cooling capacity 11,840 Btuh total, 8,130 Btuh sensible,\n21 85/72 degrees F DB/FB entering air temperature, and 100 degrees F ambient, 208-volt, single-phase\n22 power supply, MCA 8 amps, breaker 15 amps.\n23 Manufacturers and Products:\n24 Bard:\n25 Model (219A-LH-AC-001 and 219E-LH-AC-001): WA241-A-00-EXXXXA.\n26 Model (219Al-LH-AC-002 and 219E1-LH-AC-002): WA121-A-00-EXXXXJ.\n27 Or approved equal.\n28 Electric Unit Heater (For Equipment Identification Numbers See Supplement)\n29 General:\n30 Heater shall be installed and wired in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.\n31 Unit heater shall be UL listed.\n32 Casing:\n33 Fabricated of die-formed, heavy-gauge steel and finished in high gloss, baked enamel.\n34 Supply air shall be drawn through a stamped louver periphery evenly across the heating element.\n35 Discharge air shall be through an outward drawn Venturi.\n36 Cabinet shall have adjustable discharge louvers.\n37 Cabinet shall be furnished with an access door.\n38 Wiring diagram shall be permanently attached to the inside at the access door.\n39 Elements:\n40 Elements shall be high mass, all steel tubular finned type, copper brazed.\nAppendix 4D.302\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Elements shall be centrally located and installed in fixed element banks.\n2 Motor:\n3 Motor shall be totally enclosed, all angle industrial rated.\n4 Bearings shall be sealed and permanently lubricated.\n5 Fan:\n6 Fan blades shall be of the axial flow type.\n7 Fan speed shall not exceed 1,600 rpm.\n8 Wiring:\n9 Unit heater shall be factory prewired.\n10 Unit heater shall have balanced phases.\n11 Unit heater shall be equipped with automatic reset thermal overload.\n12 Controls: Wall-mounted thermostat.\n13 Manufacturers and Products:\n14 Capacity: 3.3 kW, 460 volts, three-phase, horizontal discharge.\n15 Trane; UHEC-033DACA.\n16 Relief Louver (For Equipment Identification Numbers See Supplement)\n17 Extruded aluminum frame.\n18 Double drainable blades.\n19 Bird screen.\n20 Size: Louver size as shown on Drawings.\n21 Manufacturer And Product: Ruskin; Model ELF 375DD.\n22 Damper Actuator (For Equipment Identification Numbers See Supplement)\n23 Line voltage actuator.\n24 Spring return.\n25 UL listed.\n26 NEMA 2 housing.\n27 60-inch-pound torque.\n28 Sequence of Operation: Actuator shall be interlocked with an economizer. Actuator shall be energized\n29 when economizer is on, and shall be closed when economizer is off.\n30 Manufacturer and Product: Belimo; NFl20US, 120 volts, single-phase, less than 60 seconds return\n31 time.\n32 Sequence Of Control\n33 Air Conditioning Units:\n34 Air conditioning unit shall be started by the signal from wall-mounted thermostat if the room\n35 temperature rises above 85 degrees F.\n36 Thermostat set point is 80 degrees F.\n37 If the room temperature drops below 70 degrees F, the modulating type return, outside and exhaust air\n38 dampers will be adjusted to maintain room temperature.\nAppendix 4D.303\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI When outside air temperature is between 50 degrees F and 65 degrees F, air conditioning unit will\n2 provide a free cooling.\n3 Unit Heaters: Unit heater will be operating in the ON-OFF sequence to maintain 50 degrees F\n4 temperature.\n5 Part 3 -Execution\n6 Installation\n7 Install equipment and systems in accordance with manufacturers' instructions.\n8 Packaged Wall-Mounted Air Conditioning Units:\n9 Mount unit in accordance with manufacturer's instructions.\n10 Provide access for maintenance.\n11 Seal watertight to wall.\n12 Electric Unit Heater: Install in accordance with recommendations of NFPA 90A.\n13 Supplements\n14 The supplement listed below, following \"END OF SECTION,\" is a part of this Specification.\n15 Equipment Identification Numbers.\n16 END OF SECTION 15500\n17 Equipment Identification Numbers\nLocation Equipment Name Equipment Number\nCell No. I Crest Pad Building Air Conditioning Unit 219A-LH-AC-001\nUnit Heater 219A-LH-UH-00 1\nRelief Louver with Motorized Damper 219A-LH-MD-001\nCell No. 1 Leachate Transfer Air Conditioning Unit 219Al-LH-AC-002\nBuilding Unit Heater 219Al-LH-UH-002\nRelief Louver with Motorized Damper 219Al-LH-MD-002\nCell No. 2 Crest Pad Building Air Conditioning Unit 219E-LH-AC-001\nUnit Heater 219E-LH-UH-001\nRelief Louver with Motorized Damper 219E-LH-MD-001\nCell No. 2 Leachate Transfer Air Conditioning Unit 219E1-LH-AC-002\nBuilding Unit Heater 219EI-LH-UH-002\nRelief Louver with Motorized Damper 219E 1 -LH-MD-002\nAppendix 4D.304\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI SECTION 15992 -PIPING LEAKAGE TESTING SCHED. B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 Summary\n4 This section is for leak testing (construction quality control) leachate piping and associated components.\n5 Submittals-Approval Required:\n6 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n7 Testing Plan:\n8 Submit prior to testing and include at least the information that follows.\n9 Testing dates.\n10 Piping systems and section(s) to be tested.\n11 Test type.\n12 Method of isolation.\n13 Sample of test report form.\n14 Certifications of Calibration: Testing equipment.\n15 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n16 Information/Record (IR): Certified Test Report.\n17 Provide Manufacturer's calibration recommendations and current calibrations of pressure gauge(s).\n18 Part 2 -Products (Not Used)\n19 Part 3 -Execution\n20 Preparation\n21 Notify Construction Manager in writing 5 days in advance of testing. Perform testing in presence of\n22 Construction Manager.\n23 Pressure Piping:\n24 Install temporary thrust blocking or other restraint as necessary to protect adjacent piping or\n25 equipment and make taps in piping prior to testing.\n26 Prior to test, remove or suitably isolate appurtenant instruments or devices that could be damaged by\n27 pressure testing.\n28 Items that do not require testing include: Piping between wetwells and wetwell isolation valves, tank\n29 overflows to atmospheric vented drains, tank atmospheric vents, and slotted piping.\n30 Test section may be filled with water and allowed to stand under low pressure prior to testing.\n31 Other Piping:\n32 Perform testing of other pipe service types using the same methods outlined for pressure piping.\n33 Hydrostatic Test\n34 General: Hydrostatic testing shall be performed on all single-wall pipe, inner carrier pipes, and all PVC\n35 piping.\n36 Fluid: Clean water of such quality to prevent corrosion of materials in piping system.\nAppendix 4D.305\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Test Pressure:\n2 Per Section 15060, Piping-General\n3 Exposed Piping:\n4 Perform testing on installed piping prior to application of insulation.\n5 Prior to pressure testing, check all manually operated valves for smooth operation and count and\n6 record number of turns to open and close each valve.\n7 Maximum Filling Velocity: 0.25 feet per second, applied over full area of pipe.\n8 Vent piping during filling. Open vents at high points of piping system or loosen flanges, using at least\n9 four bolts, or use equipment vents to purge air pockets.\n10 HDPE Piping\n11 Test Procedure: The test procedure consists of an initial expansion phase and then the test phase. Prior\n12 to the test procedure the test medium and pipe test section shall be allowed time to equalize in\n13 temperature. Testing shall not be allowed if temperatures of the test medium or pipe test section exceed\n14 100 degrees F.\n15 Maintain the test pressure for a period of 3 hours during the initial expansion phase by adding water as\n16 needed.\n17 At the beginning of the test phase after the initial expansion phase, reduce pressure by 10 psi. Maintain\n18 this test pressure for a period of 1 hour.\n19 Under no circumstances shall the testing be allowed to exceed 8 hours.\n20 Acceptance Criteria:\n21 The test phase is passed and the pressure test is acceptable if the pressure remains steady (within\n22 5 percent of the test phase beginning pressure) for 1 hour and there are no indications, visible or\n23 otherwise, of leakage.\n24 If acceptance criteria is not met, any leakage points shall be fixed and any other changes made to the\n25 piping system as necessary. Retest and repeat until acceptance criteria is met.\n26 Empty pipe of water prior to final cleaning.\n27 Buried Piping: Test piping using the same procedure as outlined for exposed piping as described above.\n28 PVC and Non-HDPE Piping:\n29 Perform testing on installed piping prior to application of insulation.\n30 Prior to pressure testing, check all manually operated valves for smooth operation and count and\n31 record number of turns to open and close each valve.\n32 Maximum Filling Velocity:\n33 0.25 foot per second, applied over full area of pipe.\n34 Vent piping during filling. Open vents at high points of piping system or loosen flanges, using at\n35 least four bolts, or use equipment vents to purge air pockets.\n36 Maintain hydrostatic test pressure continuously for 30 minutes, minimum, and for such additional\n37 time as necessary to conduct examinations for leakage. No fluid shall be added to the system, and\n38 system shall not drop below 95 percent of the test pressure during the test period.\n39 Examine exposed joints and connections for leakage.\n40 No loss of fluid allowed. Find any leakage points, fix, and retest as specified.\n41 Empty pipe of water prior to final cleaning or disinfection.\nAppendix 4D.306\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Pneumatic Test\n2 General: Pneumatic testing shall be performed for outer pipe of double-wall HDPE piping and\n3 atmospheric drains.\n4 Double-Wall Pipe: Inner carrier pipe shall be full of water when outer containment pipe is tested to\n5 prevent damage to carrier pipe and riser pipes.\n6 Equipment:\n7 Gauges shall be calibrated within manufacturer's recommended frequency and calibration shall be\n8 current.\n9 Install gauges, air piping manifolds, and valves at ground surface.\n10 Provide pressure release device, such as rupture disc or pressure relief valve, to relieve pressure at\n11 10 psi or less.\n12 Restrain plugs used to close lines to prevent blowoff.\n13 Procedure:\n14 Maintain test pressure for 10 to 60 minutes but not for more than 60 minutes.\n15 Slowly introduce air into pipe section until internal air pressure reaches required test pressure. (A\n16 maximum 5% gauge loss is acceptable.)\n17 Allow 2 minutes minimum for air temperature to stabilize.\n18 Examine exposed joints and connections for leakage using liquid bubble tests or other method to\n19 determine source of leakage approved by the construction manager.\n20 No loss in pressure allowed. Find any leakage points, fix, and retest as specified.\n21 Defective Piping Sections: Replace or test and seal individual joints, and retest as specified.\n22 END OF SECTION 15992\nAppendix 4D.307\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nDIVISION 16 -ELECTRICAL\nAppendix 4D.308\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI SECTION 16005- ELECTRICAL\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 UL And NRTL Compliance\n4 Materials manufactured within the scope of UL or another nationally recognized testing laboratory\n5 (NRTL) shall conform to UL or NRTL standards and have an applied UL or NRTL listing mark.\n6 References to UL throughout this section imply conformity with UL or NRTL standards and guidelines.\n7 Electrical system process control panels shall be manufactured, assembled, tested, approved, and clearly\n8 labeled in accordance with UL 508A, prior to delivery to construction site.\n9 Approval By Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ)\n10 Provide all work in accordance with NFPA 70, National Electrical Code, ANSI C2 National Electrical\n11 Safety Code (NESC), and where required by Hanford CH2M HILL authority having jurisdiction (AHJ),\n12 as defined under Division 1, material and equipment shall be labeled or listed by a nationally recognized\n13 testing laboratory or other organization acceptable to AHJ, in order to provide a basis for approval under\n14 NEC.\n15 All material and equipment shall be tested after installation by a qualified testing firm (as specified in\n16 Section 16080, ELECTRICAL TESTING), or other organization acceptable to AHJ, in order to provide a\n17 basis for approval under NEC. Construction General Contractor is responsible for providing qualified\n18 testing firm and shall coordinate with the Construction Manager for NEC inspection services.\n19 All material and equipment shall be provided with a visibly attached label by a nationally recognized\n20 testing laboratory or other organization acceptable to AHJ, prior to delivery to construction site.\n21 All motor control panels shall be provided in accordance with UL 508 and with a visibly attached label by\n22 a nationally recognized testing laboratory or other organization acceptable to AHJ, prior to delivery to\n23 construction site.\n24 All equipment shall be installed per manufacturer's instructions, with NFPA 70, NESC, and with other\n25 applicable requirements.\n26 All electrical work including conduit, wiring, and terminal and splice connections shall be accomplished\n27 by a state-registered and approved electrical j ourneyman or a state-registered and approved electrical\n28 apprentice under supervision of state-registered and approved electrical journeyman.\n29 Electrical Description Of Work\n30 Schedule A Work:\n31 Provide and install primary aerial cables, power poles, fuse-cutouts, supports, primary riser conductors,\n32 and ancillary equipment as needed to extend existing primary power circuit C8-L6 from 4th street to new\n33 IDF pad mount service transformer as shown on Drawings and in accordance with Section 16312,\n34 OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION.\n35 Provide and install IDF pad mount service transformer as shown on Drawings and in accordance with\n36 Section 16270, Oil-Filled Pad Mounted Transformer.\n37 Provide site preparation, pad mount slab and concrete work, and grounding as necessary to facilitate\n38 utility vault and pad mount service transformer installation.\n39 For primary (15kV) conductors, which route from riser pole fuse cut-outs to pad mount service\n40 transformer, reference CONDUCTOR OVER 600 VOLTS this Section.\n41 Fluor Hanford Electrical Utilities will make final aerial conductor connections to existing primary circuit\n42 C8-L6, and primary connections to pad mount service transformer.\nAppendix 4D.309\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Coordinate installation of all primary service equipment, testing, and secondary metering with\n2 Construction Manager, who will contact Fluor Hanford Electrical Utilities (FH EU).\n3 Schedule B Work:\n4 Provide and install power conduits and cables to electrical service gear for each crest pad and leachate\n5 transfer building. Power conduits and cables shall route from crest pad building electrical service gear to\n6 power handhole(s) and service transformer as shown on Drawings.\n7 FH EU will make final secondary conductor connections within low voltage compartment of pad mount\n8 service transformer after cables are routed under this schedule of work.\n9 Coordinate with FH EU installation of secondary cables and energizing of secondary service equipment.\n10 Provide and install communication conduits and cables for each crest pad and leachate transfer building\n11 communication service. Communication conduits and cables shall route below grade from crest pad\n12 building to communication handhole(s) as shown on Drawings.\n13 Provide and install electrical service gear for each crest pad and leachate transfer building including:\n14 motor control center (MCC), MCC integrally mounted lighting panel and transformer, and grounding\n15 electrode system.\n16 Motor control center shall provide 480V, three-phase, three-wire power to pump motors, power outlets,\n17 building heaters, air monitoring transformer and panel assemblies, and motor starters.\n18 Lighting panel and transformer shall provide 208/120V, three-phase, four-wire power for instruments,\n19 lighting, receptacles, small motor loads, and miscellaneous panels.\n20 Lighting panel and transformer(s) shall provide 120/240V, single-phase, three-wire power for air\n21 monitoring equipment and ancillary lighting and receptacles.\n22 Provide and install grounding electrode system at each crest pad and leachate transfer building. Bond\n23 service gear, lighting transformer, power and communication panels, and metal structures (i.e., leachate\n24 storage tank, buildings) to grounding electrode system.\n25 Provide and install power conduits and cables to the following three-phase equipment:\n26 Building unit heaters.\n27 Leachate collection and removal and leak detection system pumps.\n28 Combined sump pumps.\n29 Leachate transfer pumps.\n30 Portable generator power outlets.\n31 Provide and install power conduits and cables to the following single-phase equipment:\n32 Building interior and exterior lighting.\n33 Building receptacles.\n34 Building control panels.\n35 Building air conditioning units.\n36 Heat tracing.\n37 Air monitoring equipment.\n38 Provide and install control and signal conduits and cables to the following instrumentation:\n39 Process local control panels.\n40 Building temperature transmitters.\n41 Building sump level floats and panels.\n42 Building ventilation thermostats.\nAppendix 4D.310\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Leachate collection and removal and leak detection system pump flow meters and submersible\n2 pressure transmitters.\n3 Storage tank level transmitters and switches.\n4 Leachate collection carrier pipe leak detection level switches, mounted in combined sumps'\n5 interstitial spaces.\n6 Combined sump level floats.\n7 Leachate transfer flow meters and transmitters.\n8 Submittals-Approval Required\n9 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n10 Product Data:\n11 Primary and secondary service entrance and metering equipment.\n12 Boxes and device plates.\n13 Junction and pullboxes.\n14 Precast utility vaults, manholes and handholes.\n15 Wiring devices.\n16 Panelboards and mini-power centers.\n17 Circuit breakers and switches.\n18 Motor-rated switches.\n19 Control devices, terminal blocks, and relays.\n20 Contactors.\n21 Transformers.\n22 Support and framing channels.\n23 Nameplates and nameplate schedule.\n24 TVSS equipment.\n25 Volt and current meters.\n26 Conduit, fittings, and accessories.\n27 Wireways.\n28 Conductors, cable, and accessories.\n29 Motors:\n30 Nameplate data, detailed information on any special features.\n31 Grounding materials.\n32 Motor Controls: Arrangement drawings, ratings, schematic and wiring diagrams, bill-of-materials,\n33 nameplate schedule, manufacturer information on components.\n34 Local Control Panels:\n35 Arrangement drawings, schematic and wiring diagrams, bill of materials, nameplate schedule,\n36 manufacturer information on components.\n37 Luminaires.\n38 Factory test reports.\n39 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n40 Information/Record (IR):\nAppendix 4D.311\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Field test reports.\n2 Signed permits indicating Work is acceptable to regulatory authorities having jurisdiction.\n3 Operation and Maintenance Data:\n4 Provide for all equipment, as well as each device having features that can require adjustment,\n5 configuration, or maintenance, in accordance with Division 1, including recommended preventative\n6 maintenance tasks and frequencies for performance of those tasks.\n7 Minimum information shall include manufacturer's preprinted instruction manual, one copy of the\n8 approved submittal information for the item, tabulation of any settings, and copies of any test reports.\n9 Environmental Conditions\n10 Provide equipment and conduit systems approved for installing in the following environmental\n11 conditions:\n12 Climatic and Geographic Site Conditions:\n13 Site Elevation: 1,000 feet.\n14 Relative Humidity: 90 percent maximum at 30 degrees F dry bulb, 15 percent minimum at 60 degrees F\n15 dry bulb.\n16 Uniform Building Code: Seismic Zone 2B.\n17 Temperature: 105 degrees F max. 0 degrees F min.\n18 Enclosures and Environmental Conditions:\n19 Provide and install NEMA 250 Type 4X, Type 304 stainless steel (corrosion resistant, wash down\n20 protection) enclosures in process mechanical and wash down indoor locations unless otherwise noted\n21 within this section.\n22 Provide and install NEMA 250 Type 3 (dust, rain and ice protection) enclosures in outdoor locations\n23 unless otherwise noted in this section.\n24 Provide NEMA 250 Type 12 (dust protection) enclosures for indoor dry protected locations unless\n25 otherwise noted in this section.\n26 Labeling: Install permanent labels on all electrical panels, cabinets, disconnects, motor starters, major\n27 equipment or components, receptacles, and switches.\n28 Part 2 -Products\n29 General\n30 Products shall comply with all applicable provisions of NFPA 70.\n31 Like Items of Equipment: End products of one manufacturer in order to achieve standardization for\n32 operation, maintenance, spare parts, and manufacturer's service.\n33 Equipment and Devices Installed Outdoors or in Unheated Enclosures: Capable of continuous\n34 operation within ambient temperature ranges identified under ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS in\n35 this section.\n36 Hazardous Areas: Products shall be acceptable to the regulatory authority having jurisdiction for the\n37 interior of the combined sumps. Class 1, Division 2, Groups C and D.\n38 Equipment Finish: Manufacturer's standard finish color, except where specific color is indicated.\n39 Service Entrance\n40 Coordinate all service entrance work with Construction Manager, who will in turn coordinate with Fluor\n41 Hanford Electrical Utilities, contact person: Cris Carlson, P.E., 509-521-2823.\nAppendix 4D.312\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Utility Metering\n2 Wat-hour Meter: Socket type, for three-phase, 4-wire wye service, self-contained, with relay option\n3 board having output for watt KYZ pulses, 480 volt, class 200, form 16S, Elster alpha plus, type AID+.\n4 Meter Socket: Provide with manual circuit closing blocks, 7 terminal, 200 amp, 600 volt, Milbank type\n5 U3517-XL.\n6 Meter Base Hub: Provide for standard RL opening, 2-inch, Milbank type A7517.\n7 Lighting And Power Distribution Panelboard\n8 NEMA PB 1, NFPA 70, and UL 67.\n9 Panelboards and Circuit Breakers: Suitable for use with 75 degrees C copper wire at full NFPA 70, 75\n10 degrees C ampacity.\n11 Short-Circuit Current Equipment Rating: Fully rated; series connected unacceptable.\n12 Rating: Applicable to a system with available short-circuit current of 10,000 amperes rms symmetrical at\n13 208/120 volts and 120/240 volts.\n14 Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter (GFCI): UL Class A GFCI, 5-mA trip, 10,000-amp interrupting\n15 capacity circuit breakers.\n16 Ground Fault Equipment Protection (GFEP): 30-mA trip, 10,000-amp interrupting capacity circuit\n17 breaker, UL listed for equipment ground fault protection.\n18 Interior Panelboard: NEMA 250, Type 12 unless otherwise noted.\n19 Material: Code-gauge, hot-dip galvanized sheet steel, with reinforced steel frame.\n20 Wiring Gutter: Minimum 4 inches square; both sides, top and bottom.\n21 Front: Fastened with adjustable clamps.\n22 Interior:\n23 Factory assembled; complete with circuit breakers.\n24 Capable of circuit breaker replacement without disturbing adjacent circuit breakers or without\n25 removing main bus.\n26 Spaces: Cover openings with easily removable metal cover.\n27 Circuit Directory: Metal frame with transparent plastic face and enclosed card on interior of door.\n28 Bus Bar:\n29 Material:\n30 Copper and/or tin-plated copper full sized throughout length.\n31 Provide for mounting of future circuit breakers along full length of bus regardless of number of units\n32 and spaces shown. Machine, drill, and tap as required for current and future positions.\n33 Neutral bus with at least two (neutral and ground) terminal screws for each circuit.\n34 Note: Do not install multiwire branch circuits that share common neutral. Install neutral for each\n35 120-volt branch circuit.\n36 Lugs and Connection Points:\n37 Suitable for copper conductors.\n38 Solderless main lugs for main, neutral, and ground bus bars.\n39 Bolt together and rigidly support bus bars and connection straps on molded insulators.\nAppendix 4D.313\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Circuit Breakers:\n2 NEMA AB 1 and UL 489.\n3 Thermal-magnetic, quick-make, quick-break, molded case, of indicating type showing ON/OFF and\n4 TRIPPED positions of operating handle.\n5 Noninterchangeable, in accordance with NFPA 70.\n6 Locking: Provisions for handle padlocking, unless otherwise shown.\n7 Type:\n8 Bolt-on circuit breakers in all panelboards.\n9 Multipole circuit breakers designed to automatically open all poles when an overload occurs on one\n10 pole.\n11 Do not substitute single-pole circuit breakers with handle ties for multipole breakers.\n12 Do not use tandem or dual circuit breakers in normal single-pole spaces.\n13 Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter (GFCI):\n14 Equip with conventional thermal-magnetic trip and ground fault sensor rated to trip in 0.025 second\n15 for a 5-mA ground fault (UL 943, Class A sensitivity).\n16 Sensor with same rating as circuit breaker and a push-to-test button.\n17 Manufacturers:\n18 Square D\n19 Cutler-Hammer\n20 General Electric\n21 Allen-Bradley\n22 Mini-Power Center (MPC)\n23 General: Transformer, primary and secondary main circuit breakers, and secondary panelboard section\n24 enclosed in NEMA 250, Type 3 enclosure.\n25 Transformer:\n26 Type: Dry, self-cooled, encapsulated.\n27 Insulation: Manufacturer's standard, with UL 1561 temperature rise.\n28 Full Capacity: 2-1/2 percent voltage taps, two above and two below normal voltage.\n29 Primary Voltage: 480, three-phase; 480 single-phase as shown.\n30 Secondary Voltage: 208/120 volts, three-phase, four-wire; 120/240 volts, single-phase, three-wire as\n31 shown.\n32 Size: 7.5 kVA and 15 kVA as shown.\n33 Panelboard: UL 489, fully rated.\n34 Type: Thermal-magnetic, quick-make, quick-break, indicating, with noninterchangeable molded case\n35 circuit breakers.\n36 Number and Breaker Ampere Ratings: Refer to Panelboard Schedule.\n37 Manufacturers:\n38 Square D Co.\n39 Cutler-Hammer.\nAppendix 4D.314\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI General Electric Co.\n2 Lighting And Power Distribution Stepdown Transformer (0-600 Volts)\n3 Type: Self-cooled, two-winding.\n4 UL 1561 and NEMA ST 20.\n5 Insulation Class/Temperature Rise: 115 Degrees F.\n6 Core and Coil:\n7 30 kVA or Less: Encapsulated.\n8 Voltage Taps: Full capacity, 2-1/2 percent, two above and two below normal voltage rating.\n9 Sound Level: Not to exceed NEMA ST 20 levels.\n10 Vibration isolators to minimize and isolate sound transmission.\n11 Manufacturers:\n12 Square D\n13 Cutler-Hammer/Westinghouse\n14 General Electric.\n15 Local Control Panels\n16 Enclosure:\n17 Reference ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS in this section.\n18 Minimum Metal Thickness: 14 gauge.\n19 Doors: Rubber gasketed with continuous hinge.\n20 Incandescent Light: Hand switch controlled, 100-watt.\n21 Receptacle: Breaker protected 120-volt, 15-amp duplex.\n22 Finish: Internal and external surfaces (NEMA 250, Type 12 only):\n23 Sand panel; remove mill scale, rust, grease, and oil.\n24 Fill imperfections and sand smooth.\n25 Paint with one coat of epoxy coating metal primer, two finish coats of two-component type epoxy\n26 enamel.\n27 Sand surfaces lightly between coats.\n28 Final Dry Film Thickness: Minimum 3 mils.\n29 Size panels to adequately dissipate heat generated by equipment mounted in or on panel.\n30 Manufacturers:\n31 Hoffman.\n32 H. F. Cox.\n33 Wiring:\n34 Power and Control Wiring: 600-volt class, insulated, stranded copper.\n35 Size: Minimum No. 14 AWG enclosed in either sheet metal raceway or plastic wiring duct.\n36 Signal Circuit Wiring: Twisted shielded pairs minimum No. 16 AWG, separated at least 6 inches from\n37 power wiring.\nAppendix 4D.315\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Identification: Permanent heat impregnated polyvinyl chloride (PVC) alpha-numeric labels.\n2 Safety Switches\n3 UL 98 listed for use and location of installation.\n4 Type: Visible blade, fusible.\n5 Class: Heavy-duty.\n6 Enclosures: Reference ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS in this section.\n7 Circuit Breaker, Individual, 0 To 600 Volts:\n8 UL 489 listed for use at location of installation.\n9 Minimum Interrupt Rating: As shown.\n10 Thermal-magnetic, quick-make, quick-break, indicating type, showing ON/OFF and TRIPPED\n11 indicating positions of operating handle.\n12 Suitable for use with 75 degrees C wire at full NFPA 70, 75 degrees C ampacity.\n13 Locking: Provisions for padlocking handle.\n14 Enclosure: Reference ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS in this section.\n15 Interlock: Enclosure and switch shall interlock to prevent opening cover with breaker in the ON\n16 position.\n17 Manufacturers:\n18 Square D Co.\n19 Cutler-Hammer.\n20 General Electric Co.\n21 Allen-Bradley.\n22 Fused Switch, Individual, 0 To 600 Volts:\n23 UL 98 listed for use and location of installation.\n24 NEMA KS 1 and UL 98 Listed for application to system with available short-circuit current as\n25 shown.\n26 Quick-make, quick-break, motor rated, load-break, heavy-duty (HD) type with external markings\n27 clearly indicating ON/OFF positions.\n28 Suitable for use with 75 degrees C wire at full NFPA 70, 75 degrees C ampacity.\n29 Fuse mountings shall reject Class H fuses and accept only current-limiting fuses specified.\n30 Enclosure: Reference ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS in this section.\n31 Interlock: Enclosure and switch to prevent opening cover with switch in ON position.\n32 Manufacturers:\n33 Square D Co.\n34 Cutler-Hammer.\n35 General Electric Co.\n36 Fuse, 0 To 600 Volts\n37 Current-limiting, with 42,000 max ampere rms interrupting rating.\n38 Provide to fit mountings specified with switches and features to reject Class H fuses.\nAppendix 4D.316\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Motor and Transformer Circuits, 0 to 600 Volts:\n2 Amperage: 0 to 600.\n3 UL 198E, Class RK-1, dual element, with time delay.\n4 Manufacturers and Products:\n5 Bussmann: Type LPS-RK.\n6 Littelfuse, Inc.: Type LLS-RK.\n7 Motor and Transformer Circuits, 0 to 250 Volts:\n8 Amperage: 0 to 600.\n9 UL 198E, Class RK-1, dual element, with time delay.\n10 Manufacturers and Products:\n11 Bussmann; Type LPN-RK.\n12 Littelfuse, Inc.; Type LLN-RK.\n13 Feeder and Service Circuits, 0 to 600 Volts:\n14 Amperage: 0 to 600.\n15 UL 198E, Class RK- 1, dual element, with time delay.\n16 Manufacturers and Products:\n17 Bussmann; Type LPS-RK.\n18 Littelfuse, Inc.; Type LLS-RK.\n19 Magnetic Control Relays\n20 NEMA ICS 2, Class A600 (600 volts, 10 amperes continuous, 7,200VA make, 720VA break), machine\n21 tool type with field convertible contacts.\n22 Smaller Magnetic Control Relays: Reference Section 13401, PROCESS INSTRUMENTATION AND\n23 CONTROL SYSTEMS (PICS).\n24 Time Delay Relay\n25 Industrial Relay Rated: 150 volts, 5 amps continuous, (3600 VA make, 360 VA break).\n26 Solid-state electronic, field convertible ON/OFF delay.\n27 Two Form-C contacts (minimum).\n28 Repeat accuracy plus or minus 2 percent.\n29 Timer Adjustment: Multiple adjustable ranges, including I to 60 seconds, unless otherwise shown.\n30 Manufacturers:\n31 Omron.\n32 Cutler-Hammer.\n33 General Electric Co.\n34 Allen-Bradley.\n35 Elapsed Time Meters\n36 Type: Synchronous motor driven, 0 to 99,999.9 hours range, nonreset, suitable for semiflush, panel\n37 mounting.\nAppendix 4D.317\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Manufacturers:\n2 General Electric Co.\n3 Veeder-Root.\n4 Phase Monitor Relay\n5 Voltage and phase monitor relay shall drop out on loss of phase, or phase reversal.\n6 Contacts: Single-pole, double-throw, 10 amperes, 120/240V ac. Where additional contacts are shown or\n7 required, provide magnetic control relays.\n8 Adjustable trip and time delay settings.\n9 Transient Protection: 1,000V ac.\n10 Mounting: Multipin plug-in socket base.\n11 Accessories: Provide properly sized and rated line isolating switches and fuses for each phase monitored.\n12 Manufacturer:\n13 Square D Co.\n14 Cutler-Hammer.\n15 General Electric Co.\n16 Allen-Bradley.\n17 Transient Voltage Surge Suppressor (TVSS) Equipment\n18 General: Units shall be suitable for the service voltage and configuration (phases and wires) shown.\n19 Protection Modes:\n20 Normal, differential, and common.\n21 Bipolar or bi-directional.\n22 Ratings:\n23 Short-circuit current rating shall equal or exceed that of protected distribution equipment. Surge\n24 Voltage Rating (SVR) shall not exceed those specified under UL 1449 for the associated nominal\n25 system voltage. Maximum Allowable Continuous Operating Voltage (MCOV) shall be at least\n26 115 percent of the nominal system voltage.\n27 Unit shall be UL-listed.\n28 Provide status indicators for unit ON-LINE and unit operation NORMAL.\n29 Provide common alarm contact output.\n30 Provide fusible disconnect switch (integral with TVSS unit, where available) where not shown\n31 connected via branch circuit device of protected distribution equipment.\n32 Minimum Enclosure Rating: NEMA 250, Type 12.\n33 Type 2 TVSS:\n34 Requirements: Designed for critical loads at service equipment (Category C3/B3) or distribution\n35 panelboard (Category C2/B3) locations. Unit shall utilize voltage-matched Silicon Avalanche Suppressor\n36 Diode (SASD) technology. Unit shall utilize modular, plug-in suppressor design.\n37 Manufacturer and Product: Transtector; Model Apex III (nonservice entrance distribution panelboard)\n38 or Apex IV (service equipment).\n39 Volt And Current Meters\n40 Voltmeter, Panel Type:\nAppendix 4D.318\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI NEMA 250 Type 12.\n2 Nominal 3-1/2 inch model.\n3 90 degree scale; accuracy of plus or minus 2 percent.\n4 Manufacturer: Same as Manufacturer of Motor Control Center.\n5 Voltmeter Switch:\n6 NEMA 250 Type 12.\n7 Rotary cam type with pistol grip handle engraved escutcheon.\n8 Four-position, phase-to-phase, and OFF.]\n9 Manufacturer: Same as Manufacturer of Motor Control Center.\n10 Ammeter, Panel Type:\n11 NEMA 250 Type 12.\n12 Nominal 3-1/2-inch model.\n13 90 degree scale; accuracy of plus or minus 2 percent.\n14 Manufacturer: Same as Manufacturer of Motor Control Center.\n15 Ammeter Switch:\n16 NEMA 250 Type 12.\n17 Rotary cam type with pistol grip handle engraved escutcheon.\n18 Four-position, three-phase currents, and OFF.\n19 Manufacturer: Same as Manufacturer of Motor Control Center.\n20 Conduit And Fittings\n21 Rigid Galvanized Steel Conduit (RGS)\n22 ANSI C80.1.\n23 Fittings: Threaded type.\n24 Galvanize by hot-dipping, electroplating, sherardizing, or metalizing process, including fittings.\n25 Polyvinyl Chloride Conduit (PVC):\n26 Rigid, Schedule 40, NEMA TC 2.\n27 UL 651 listed for concrete encased, direct burial, concealed and direct sunlight exposed use.\n28 UL 651 listed and marked for use with conductors having 90 degrees C insulation.\n29 Fittings: NEMA TC 3, for intended use.\n30 Flexible Metal Liquid-Tight Conduit:\n31 UL I listed for liquid-tight service.\n32 Galvanized steel, flexible conduit covered with extruded PVC jacket.\n33 Termination: Nylon bushings or bushings with steel or malleable iron body and insulated throat and\n34 sealing O-ring.\n35 Interior Conduit Sealing:\n36 Spare conduits should be capped in panels and handholes.\n37 Conduits inside handholes will be sealed using spray insulating foam or other material, which is non-\n38 deleterious to conductors and cables.\nAppendix 4D.319\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Conduits inside panels will be sealed using insulating foam or other material, which is non-\n2 deleterious to conductors and cables.\n3 Conduit Sealing Fitting:\n4 Restrict the passage of gasses, vapors, or flames from one portion of the electrical installation to\n5 another at atmospheric pressure and normal ambient temperatures.\n6 In conduit systems when leaving Class 1, Division 2 hazardous locations.\n7 Manufacturers and Products:\n8 Appleton; Type EYF, EYM, or ESU.\n9 Crouse-Hinds; Type EYS or EZS.\n10 Fitting Sealing Compound: Form a seal around each electrical conductor and between them and inside\n11 of the sealing fitting to restrict the passage of gases, vapors, or flames through the sealing fitting.\n12 Manufacturers and Products:\n13 Appleton; Kwiko.\n14 Crouse-Hinds; Chico.\n15 Identification Devices: Conduit tags.\n16 Material: Permanent, nylon.\n17 Shape: Round.\n18 Conduit Designation: Pressure stamped, embossed or engraved.\n19 Support and Framing Channels\n20 Carbon Steel Framing Channel:\n21 Material: Rolled, mild strip steel, 12-gauge, ASTM A570, Grade 33.\n22 Finish: Hot-dip galvanized after fabrication.\n23 Paint-Coated Framing Channel: Carbon steel framing channel with electro-deposited rust inhibiting\n24 acrylic or epoxy paint.\n25 Manufacturers:\n26 B-Line Systems, Inc.\n27 Unistrut Corp.\n28 Aickinstrut.\n29 Precast Utility Vaults, Manholes and Handholes\n30 Concrete Strength: Minimum 3,000 psi compressive, in 28 days.\n31 Loading: AASHTO H-20, in accordance with ASTM C857.\n32 Drainage: Slope floors toward drain points, leaving no pockets or other nondraining areas.\n33 Raceway Entrances:\n34 Provide on all four sides along with pulling eyes.\n35 For raceways to be installed under this Contract, provide knockout panels or precast individual\n36 raceway openings.\n37 At entrances where raceways are to be installed by others, provide minimum 12-inch high by 24-inch\n38 wide knockout panels for future raceway installation.\nAppendix 4D.320\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Handhole Frames and Covers:\n2 Material: Steel, hot-dipped galvanized.\n3 Cover Type: Solid, torsion spring of checkered diamond design.\n4 Cover Loading: AASHTO H-20.\n5 Cover Designation: Bum by welder, on upper side in integral letters, minimum 2 inches in height,\n6 appropriate titles:\n7 Above 600 Volts: ELECTRIC HV.\n8 600 Volts and Below: ELECTRIC LV.\n9 Instrumentation, Communication: Signal.\n10 Hardware: Steel, hot-dip galvanized.\n11 Furnish knockout for ground rod in each handhole.\n12 Manufacturers:\n13 Utility Vault Co.\n14 Penn-Cast Products, Inc.\n15 Concrete Conduit Co.\n16 Associated Concrete Products, Inc.\n17 Pipe, Inc.\n18 Conductors 600 Volts And Below\n19 Material: Annealed copper.\n20 Insulation:\n21 No. 8 AWG and Smaller: Type THW, THWN or XHHW conductors may be utilized at Construction\n22 General Contractor's option, subject to code requirements.\n23 No. 6 AWG and Larger: Type XHHW.\n24 Direct Buried: Type XLPE-USE.\n25 Flexible Cord and Cable: Type SO, 600 volts.\n26 Signal: Type 3, No. 16 AWG twisted, shielded pair instrumentation cable, 45-mil PVC outer jacket,\n27 600-volt rating.\n28 Type:\n29 Control Conductor No. 14 AWG and Smaller: Stranded.\n30 Power Conductors No. 10 AWG and Smaller: Solid or stranded.\n31 Power Conductors No. 8 AWG and Larger: Stranded.\n32 Type 3: No. 16 AWG stranded (copper seven-stranded)\n33 Conductors Above 600 Volts (Schedule A Work Only)\n34 Ethylene-Propylene Rubber (EPR) Insulated Cable:\n35 Extrusion: Single-pass, triple-tandem, of conductor screen, insulation, and insulation screen.\n36 Type: 15kV, tape shielded UL 1072, Type MV-90.\nAppendix 4D.321\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Conductors: Copper concentric lay Class B round stranded in accordance with ASTM B3, ASTM 88,\n2 and ASTM B263.\n3 Conductor Screen: Extruded, semi-conducting ethylene-propylene rubber in accordance with\n4 NEMA WC 71 and AEIC CS 6.\n5 Insulation: 133 percent insulation level, ethylene-propylene rubber (EPR), containing no polyethylene in\n6 accordance with NEMA WC 71, and AEIC CS 6.\n7 Insulation Thickness: 220-mil, 15 kV, nominal.\n8 Insulation Screen: Thermosetting, semi-conducting ethylene-propylene rubber (EPR), extruded directly\n9 over insulation in accordance with NEMA WC 74, and AEIC CS 6.\n10 Metallic Shield: Uncoated, 5-mil, copper shielding tape, helically applied with [17-1/2] percent\n11 minimum overlap.\n12 Jacket: Extruded polyvinyl chloride (PVC) compound applied over the metallic shield in accordance\n13 with NEMA WC 71.\n14 Operating Temperature: 90 degrees C continuous normal operations, 130 degrees C emergency\n15 operating conditions, and 250 degrees C short-circuit conditions.\n16 Manufacturers:\n17 Okonite Co.\n18 Pirelli Wire and Cable.\n19 BICC.\n20 Southwire Co.\n21 Accessories For Conductors Above 600 Volts (Schedule A Work Only)\n22 Termination Kits:\n23 Capable of terminating 15 kV, single-conductor, polymeric-insulated tape shielded cables plus a\n24 shield ground clamp.\n25 Capable of producing a termination with a current rating equal to, or greater than, the cable ampacity,\n26 meeting Class I requirements of IEEE 48.\n27 Capable of accommodating any form of cable shielding or construction without the need for special\n28 adapters or accessories.\n29 Manufacturers:\n30 Raychem.\n31 3M Co.\n32 Elbow Connector Systems: Molded, peroxide-cured, EPDM-insulated, Class 15 kV, 95kV BIL, 200A,\n33 10,000A rms load-break elbows as shown having all copper current-carrying parts in accordance with\n34 ANSI 386.\n35 Protective Caps: Class 15 kV, 95 kV BIL, 200 amperes, with molded EPDM insulated body.\n36 Insulated Standoff Bushings: Class 15kV, 95kV BIL, 200 amperes, complete with EPDM rubber body,\n37 stainless steel eyebolt with brass pressure foot, and stainless steel base bracket.\n38 Bushing Inserts: 15kV, 95kV BIL, 200A, load-break with EPDM rubber body and all-copper, current-\n39 carrying parts.\nAppendix 4D.322\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Manufacturers:\n2 Cooper Industries.\n3 Elastimold.\n4 Cable Lugs:\n5 In accordance with NEMA CCL.\n6 Rated 15kV of same material as conductor metal.\n7 Manufacturers and Products, Uninsulated Compression Connectors and Terminators:\n8 Burndy, Hydent.\n9 Thomas & Betts; Color-Keyed.\n10 ILSCO.\n11 Terminal Blocks and Enclosures\n12 Provide enclosures for all indoor and outdoor terminal block applications in accordance with\n13 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS in this section..\n14 Type: Compression screw clamp, with current bar providing direct contact with wire and yoke, with\n15 individual rail mounted terminals.\n16 Yokes and Clamping Screws: Zinc-plated, hardened steel.\n17 Rating: 600V ac.\n18 Pushbuttons and Selector Switches\n19 NEMA ICS 2, Type 600.\n20 Type: Heavy-duty, oiltight.\n21 Lockout: Pushbuttons and selector switches shall lock in OFF position wherever lockout provisions are\n22 indicated.\n23 Nameplates:\n24 Individual, large, laminated plastic.\n25 Function indicated.\n26 Pushbutton station nameplates shall indicate the drive controlled.\n27 Manufacturers and Models:\n28 Square D; Type T.\n29 Cutler-Hammer; Type 10250T.\n30 General Electric.\n31 Luminaires\n32 Specific requirements relating to fixture type, lamp type, poles, and mounting hardware are located in the\n33 Luminaire Schedule attached to this section.\n34 Receptacles\n35 NEMA WD 1 and FS W-C-596.\n36 Specification Grade:\n37 Type: Three-wire grounding, with screw type terminals suitable for No. 10 AWG wire. Contact to be\n38 made on two sides of each inserted blade without detent.\nAppendix 4D.323\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Number of Poles: Two.\n2 Rating: 125 volts, NEMA WD 1, Configuration 5-20R, 20 amps.\n3 Base: Phenolic composition.\n4 Color: Gray.\n5 Special Outlets\n6 Weatherproof outdoor heavy duty circuit breaking receptacle assembly and housing.\n7 One matching plug with cord-grip features for each special purpose outlet.\n8 Rating: 100-amp rating, 600 volts, three-phase, three-wire with ground (four-pole) as required for\n9 anticipated purpose.\n10 Manufacturer and Model:\n11 Crouse-Hinds, Arktite Style 2 AREA 10425.\n12 Or equal.\n13 Switches\n14 NEMA WD 1 and FS W-S-896E.\n15 Totally enclosed, ac type, quiet tumbler switches, with screw terminals.\n16 Capable of control of 100 percent tungsten filament and fluorescent lamp loads.\n17 Rating: 20 amps, 120/277 volts (single and double-pole as required).\n18 Color: Gray.\n19 Boxes\n20 Small Standard Boxes: NEMA 250, Type 1, minimum 2 inches deep, unless shallower required by\n21 structural conditions.\n22 Large Galvanized Steel Boxes: NEMA 250, Type 12 unless otherwise noted.\n23 14-gauge, with full access screw covers mounted with corrosion-resistant machine screws.\n24 Large Cast Metal Boxes: NEMA 250, Type 4, (Type 7 for combined sumps), cast malleable iron, with\n25 hot-dip galvanized finish.\n26 Neoprene gasketed, watertight, with cast metal covers, stainless steel screws, and drilled and tapped\n27 conduit entrances.\n28 Handholes: Reinforced cast concrete boxes sized to provide adequate working space as required by\n29 standard procedures and NFPA 70.\n30 Nonmetallic:\n31 Box: PVC.\n32 Cover: PVC, weatherproof, with stainless steel screws.\n33 Manufacturer and Product: Carlon; Type FS or FD, with Type E98 or E96 covers.\n34 Large Nonmetallic Box: NEMA 250, Type 4X.\n35 Box: High-impact, fiberglass-reinforced polyester or engineered thermoplastic, with stability to high\n36 heat.\n37 Cover: Hinged with clamps.\n38 Hardware and Machine Screws: ASTM A167, Type 316 stainless steel.\nAppendix 4D.324\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Conduit hubs and mounting lugs.\n2 Manufacturers and Products:\n3 Crouse-Hinds; Type NJB.\n4 Carlon; Series N, C, or H.\n5 Robroy Industries.\n6 Metal Wireways\n7 Meet requirements of UL 870.\n8 Type: Steel-enclosed, with removable, hinged cover.\n9 Rating: Reference ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS in this section.\n10 Finish: Gray, baked enamel.\n11 Manufacturers:\n12 Circle AW.\n13 Hoffman.\n14 Square D.\n15 Cover Plates\n16 Metal:\n17 Material: Specification grade, one-piece, stainless steel.\n18 Thickness: Minimum 0.40-inch nominal.\n19 Finish: No. 302/304 satin.\n20 Mounting Screws: Oval head, stainless steel, to match plate.\n21 Cast Metal:\n22 Material: Malleable ferrous, with gaskets.\n23 Mounting Screws: Oval head, stainless steel.\n24 Weatherproof Device Plates:\n25 Material: Cast metal, gasketed, weatherproof, with individual cap over each opening held with stainless\n26 steel springs.\n27 Finish: Stainless steel or fiberglass reinforced plastic.\n28 Mounting Screws: Stainless steel.\n29 Grounding\n30 General\n31 Grounding shall be in compliance with NFPA 70 and ANSI C2.\n32 Ground electrical service neutral at service entrance equipment to supplementary grounding\n33 electrodes.\n34 Ground each separately derived system neutral to nearest effectively grounded building structural\n35 steel member or separate grounding electrode.\n36\n37\nAppendix 4D.325\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Bond together system neutrals, service equipment enclosures, exposed noncurrent-carrying metal\n2 parts of electrical equipment, metal raceways, ground conductor in raceways and cables, receptacle\n3 ground connections, metal piping systems, and metal structures which may become energized by\n4 attached electrical devices (i.e., leachate storage tank, metal frame of buildings).\n5 Shielded Instrumentation Cables:\n6 Ground shield of instrumentation cables at PLC end only, using drain wire connected to terminal\n7 block that is connected to an isolated instrument ground. Isolated instrument ground terminals block\n8 is located inside PLC control panel enclosure.\n9 Insulate ungrounded end of all shielded instrumentation cables' shield with shrink tubing for a\n10 distance of 1/2 inch either side of the end of the outer jacket.\n11 Wire Connections:\n12 Ground Conductors: Install in conduit containing power conductors and control circuits.\n13 Nonmetallic Raceways and Flexible Tubing:\n14 Install equipment grounding conductor and bond at both ends.\n15 Connect ground conductors to raceway grounding bushings.\n16 Bond all equipment grounding conductors to equipment ground bus and equipment enclosures as\n17 required by the NEC.\n18 Bolt connections to equipment ground bus.\n19 Bond grounding conductors to metallic enclosures at each end, and to intermediate metallic\n20 enclosures.\n21 Junction Boxes: Furnish materials and connect to equipment grounding system with grounding clips\n22 mounted directly on box, or with 3/8-inch machine screws.\n23 Motor Grounding: Extend equipment ground bus via grounding conductor installed in motor feeder\n24 raceway; connect to motor frame.\n25 Nonmetallic Raceways and Flexible Tubing: Install an equipment grounding conductor and bond at\n26 both ends.\n27 Motors Less Than 10 hp: Furnish compression, spade-type terminal connected to conduit box mounting\n28 screw.\n29 Circuits 20 Amps or Above: Tap motor frame or equipment housing; install solderless terminal with\n30 minimum 5/16-inch diameter bolt.\n31 Grounding Conductors:\n32 Equipment: Solid or stranded copper with green, Type USE/RHH/RHW-XLPE or THHN/THWN,\n33 insulation.\n34 Direct Buried: Bare stranded copper.\n35 Isolated Instrument Ground: Stranded copper with green insulation with yellow stripe or yellow\n36 phasing tape at all ends.\n37 Ground Rod:\n38 Material: Copper.\n39 Diameter: Minimum 3/4 inch.\n40 Length: 10 feet.\nAppendix 4D.326\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Connectors:\n2 Exothermic Weld Type:\n3 Outdoor Weld: Suitable for exposure to elements or direct burial.\n4 Indoor Weld: Utilize low-smoke, low-emission process.\n5 Manufacturers: Erico Products, Inc., Cadweld and Cadweld Exolon.\n6 Compression Type:\n7 Compress-deforming type; wrought copper extrusion material.\n8 Single indentation for conductors 6 AWG and smaller.\n9 Double indentation with extended barrel for conductors 4 AWG and larger.\n10 Barrels prefilled with oxide-inhibiting and antiseizing compound and sealed.\n11 Manufacturers:\n12 Burndy Corp.\n13 Thomas and Betts Co.\n14 ILSCO Corp.\n15 Mechanical Type: Split-bolt, saddle, or cone screw type; copper alloy material.\n16 Manufacturers:\n17 Burndy Corp.\n18 Thomas and Betts Co.\n19 ILSCO Corp.\n20 Grounding Wells:\n21 Ground rod box complete with cast iron riser ring and traffic cover marked GROUND ROD.\n22 Manufacturers and Products:\n23 Christy Co.; No. G5.\n24 Lightning and Grounding Systems, Inc.; I-R Series.\n25 Part 3 -Execution\n26 General\n27 All work shall be performed in a neat and workman-like manner and shall comply with all applicable\n28 provisions of NECA 5055 standards and practices.\n29 Install materials and equipment in hazardous areas in a manner acceptable to regulatory authority\n30 having jurisdiction for the hazardous area indicated.\n31 Ground equipment, enclosures, and complete conduit system securely in accordance with applicable\n32 sections of NFPA 70.\n33 Panelboards and Mini-Power Centers\n34 Install securely, plumb, in-line and square with walls.\n35 Install top of cabinet 6 feet above floor, unless otherwise shown.\n36 Provide typewritten circuit directory for each panelboard.\n37 Cabinet Location/Type:\n38 Industrial Use in Areas Not Otherwise Classified: Reference ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS in\n39 this section.\nAppendix 4D.327\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Transient Voltage Surge Suppression (TVSS) Equipment\n2 Install in accordance with manufacturer's instructions, including lead length, overcurrent protection,\n3 and grounding.\n4 Motor Starter\n5 Field adjust trip settings of motor starter magnetic, trip-only circuit breakers in accordance with\n6 manufacturer's instructions.\n7 Conduit And Fittings\n8 General:\n9 Conduit system shall be carefully planned with proper attention to details before starting the work.\n10 Do not install crushed or deformed raceways. Replace any raceway that has been damaged after\n11 installation.\n12 Raceways that are installed so as to form a moisture trap are not allowed.\n13 Prevent plaster, dirt, or trash from lodging in raceways, boxes, fittings, and equipment during the\n14 course of construction. Clear clogged raceways of obstructions.\n15 All conduit runs shall be made parallel to or perpendicular to the lines of the building.\n16 Secure conduits entering cabinets, pull boxes or outlet boxes with galvanized locknuts and bushings,\n17 on both sides of box wall.\n18 Identify conduits at each terminus using conduit and cable schedule designations.\n19 Applications:\n20 Exposed Exterior: Type RGS.\n21 Concrete Embedded: Type PVC.\n22 Direct Buried: Type PVC inside concrete duct bank.\n23 Vertical Runs Through Slab on Grade: Convert PVC conduit to RGS wrapped with watertight\n24 adhesive plastic tape.\n25 PVC Bends: Bends in PVC runs shall be incorporated using RGS. RGS wrapped with watertight\n26 adhesive plastic tape.\n27 Final Connection to Motors:\n28 Conduit Size 4 Inches or Less: 18-inch minimum, 60-inch maximum length of flexible liquid-tight\n29 metal conduit.\n30 Penetrations:\n31 Conduits penetrating fire-rated walls shall be sealed with a compound approved by UL and\n32 appropriate to the fire rating of the wall.\n33 Flash and counterflash conduits penetrating roofing membrane.\n34 Seal penetrations with oakum or expandable plastic compound.\n35 Provide sleeves and chases where conduits pass through floors or walls. Finish to match adjacent\n36 surfaces.\n37 Provide escutcheon plates where exposed conduits pass through walls, floors or ceilings.\n38 Conduits from the combined sump area shall be sealed with a compound approved by UL, and\n39 appropriate for conduits in hazardous areas entering nonhazardous areas.\n40 Slab-On-Grade or Direct Buried:\n41 Install horizontal runs below floor slab. Horizontal runs within slab shall not be permitted.\nAppendix 4D.328\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Field wrap RGS conduit and joints installed below slab or direct buried with 0.010-inch thick pipe\n2 wrapping plastic tape applied with a 50 percent overlay, or factory apply a plastic resin, epoxy, or\n3 coal-tar coating system.\n4 Exposed Raceways:\n5 Install parallel or perpendicular to walls, structural members, or intersections of vertical planes and\n6 ceilings.\n7 Underground Duct Banks:\n8 All underground duct banks shall be installed in locations shown on drawings, enclosed in a red\n9 concrete casing as specified in Section 03301, CONCRETE. The concrete casing shall also enclose\n10 all standard conduit bends or elbows. All underground ducts shall have steel reinforcement in sizes as\n11 shown on the drawings.\n12 Excavate the trenches as specified in Section 02316, EXCAVATION, to provide elevation on top of\n13 concrete envelope as shown on drawings. After trenches are excavated and graded, the duct shall be\n14 laid in rows on plastic spacers or approved equals.\n15 Spacers shall be placed so that each section of duct is supported at intervals as specified in NFPA 70\n16 (NEC). Concrete shall then be placed per Section 03301, CONCRETE, until the ducts are covered to\n17 the required depth and leveled, leaving NOT less than 4 inches of concrete over top tier of ducts.\n18 Backfill shall be in accordance with Section 02320, TRENCH BACKFILL.\n19 Changes in Direction of Runs:\n20 Make with symmetrical bends or cast metal fittings.\n21 Bends and offsets shall be made with a hickey or conduit bending machine.\n22 Supports:\n23 Provide pipe straps, wall brackets, conduit clamps, conduit hangers, threaded C-clamps with retainers,\n24 or ceiling trapeze.\n25 Install suitable braces for conduit, junction boxes, light fixtures and other electrical equipment as\n26 needed for seismic support.\n27 Securely and rigidly fasten in place.\n28 Maximum Interval: 10 feet.\n29 Precast Utility Vaults, Manholes and Handholes\n30 Excavate, shore, brace, backfill, and final grade in accordance with Section 02316, EXCAVATION\n31 and Section 02320, TRENCH BACKFILL.\n32 Do not install until final raceway grading has been determined.\n33 Install such that raceways enter at nearly right angles and as near as possible to one end of wall,\n34 unless otherwise shown.\n35 Conductors\n36 Conduit system shall be complete prior to drawing conductors.\n37 Lubricate prior to drawing into conduit. Lubrication type shall be as approved by conductor\n38 manufacturer.\n39 Connections: Pressure type solderless, complete with insulator and security ring.\n40 Control Circuits:\n41 Where multiple units perform parallel operations, do not group all devices on same branch circuit.\n42 Do not exceed the ampacity of the branch circuit, or 12 amperes continuous.\nAppendix 4D.329\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Terminate feeder and interconnecting conductors between panel mounted equipment and external\n2 equipment at numbered terminal blocks.\n3 Identification:\n4 Where two or more conduits run to a single outlet box, color code each circuit as a guide in making\n5 connections.\n6 Carry colors continuously throughout the system.\n7 Do not install multiwire branch circuits that share a common neutral.\n8 Identify conductors, cables at each terminus, and handhole using conduit and cable schedule\n9 designations.\n10 Colors:\n11 Confirm and utilize the existing Hanford field center color coding system as shown below:\n12 Conductor Origin: 480Y/277-volt, three-phase system. Transformers, panels, switchboard, etc.\n13 Phase A Red\n14 Phase B Yellow\n15 Phase C Blue\n16 Neutral White or Gray\n17 Equipment Ground Green (or bare)\n18 Conductor Origin: 208Y/120-volt, three-phase system. Transformers, panels, switchboard, etc.\n19 Phase A Black\n20 Phase B Purple\n21 Phase C Brown\n22 Neutral White or Gray\n23 Equipment Ground Green (or bare)\n24 Conductor Origin: 120/240-volt, single-phase system. Transformers, panels, switchboard, etc.\n25 Hot Number I Black\n26 Hot Number 2 Brown\n27 Neutral White or Gray\n28 Equipment Ground Green (or bare)\n29 Conductor Origin: DC system. Instruments, control panels, etc.\n30 DC+ Red\n31 DC- Black\n32 Conductors Above 600 Volts (Schedule A Work Only)\n33 Do not splice conductors.\n34 Single Conductor Cable Terminations:\n35 Coordinate all terminations with FH EU.\n36 Make terminations with termination kits, in accordance with kit manufacturer's instructions. Install\n37 terminations as continuous operation in accessible locations under clean, dry conditions.\n38 Provide heat shrinkable stress control and outer nontracking insulation tubings, high relative\n39 permittivity stress relief mastic for insulation shield cutback treatment, and a heat-activated sealant\n40 for environmental sealing plus a ground braid and clamp.\nAppendix 4D.330\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Install terminals or connectors acceptable for type of conductor material used.\n2 Provide shield termination and grounding for all terminations.\n3 Provide necessary mounting hardware, covers, and connectors.\n4 Where elbow connectors are specified, install in accordance with manufacturer's instructions.\n5 Connections and Terminations:\n6 Install uninsulated crimp connectors and terminators for instrumentation, control, and power circuit\n7 conductors No. 4 AWG through No. 2/0 AWG.\n8 Give 2 working day's notice to FH EU prior to making terminations.\n9 Terminal Blocks\n10 Install for termination of all control circuits leaving or entering equipment, panels, or boxes.\n11 Luminaires\n12 Install luminaires and poles in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations.\n13 Install plumb and true.\n14 Provide swivel type hangers and canopies to match pendant mounted fixtures.\n15 Furnish all lamps and clean the reflectors, the diffusers, and the lamps before closing up the fixtures.\n16 Boxes\n17 Support to the structure, independent of conduit attachment.\n18 Boxes installed belowgrade shall be installed flush with finished grade.\n19 Boxes and covers in paved areas, roadways, or walkways shall be suitable for weights to which they\n20 may be subjected.\n21 Box Extensions: Not permitted.\n22 Classified Hazardous Areas: Boxes shall be applicable for location.\n23 Cover Plates\n24 Shall fit tightly to box.\n25 Shall not extend beyond sides of box on surface mounted boxes, unless covers have no sharp corners\n26 or edges.\n27 Trench Backfill\n28 In accordance with Section 02320, TRENCH BACKFILL.\n29 Protection Following Installation\n30 Protect materials and equipment from corrosion, physical damage, and the effects of moisture on\n31 insulation.\n32 Cap conduit runs during construction with manufactured seals.\n33 Close openings in boxes or equipment during construction.\n34 Energize space heaters furnished with equipment.\n35 Construction Quality Control\n36 In accordance with Section 16080, ELECTRICAL TESTING, and as specified herein.\n37 Circuit Balance: Confirm the balance of electrical load between phases on three-phase panelboards and\n38 motor control centers after installation. Notify Construction Manager of current unbalances 10 percent\n39 and greater.\nAppendix 4D.331\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Voltage Testing: When installation is complete and facility is in operation, check voltage at point of\n2 termination of electric supply system to project.\n3 Check voltage amplitude and balance between phases for loaded and unloaded conditions.\n4 Record supply voltage for 24 continuous hours. If unbalance exceeds 1 percent, or if voltage varies\n5 throughout the day and from loaded to unloaded conditions more than plus or minus 4 percent of nominal,\n6 make written request to Tank Farm Contractor to correct condition.\n7 Equipment Line Current:\n8 Check line current in each phase for each piece of equipment.\n9 If electric utility makes adjustments to supply voltage magnitude or balance, make line current check after\n10 adjustments are made.\n11 Inspection of Low Voltage Cables, 600 Volts Maximum (Note: FH EU shall inspect and test all cables\n12 rated above 600 volts):\n13 Inspect each individual exposed power cable for physical damage, proper connections in accordance with\n14 Section 16080, ELECTRICAL TESTING.\n15 Electrical Tests for Conductors (600 Volts and Below):\n16 Prior to final connection and energizing of power and control circuits, conduct an insulation resistance\n17 test to determine insulation integrity in accordance with Section 16080, ELECTRICAL TESTING.\n18 Ground Electrode Test:\n19 Inspect grounding connections prior to any backfill of cables in accordance with Section 16080,\n20 ELECTRICAL TESTING.\n21 Maximum ground electrode resistance shall be 3 ohms. Add maximum 2 additional ground rods spaced\n22 6 feet apart if 3 ohms is not achieved.\n23 Supplements\n24 The supplement listed below, following \"END OF SECTION,\" is a part of this Specification.\n25 Supplement 1-Luminaire Schedule.\n26 END OF SECTION 16005\nAppendix 4D.332\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nLuminaire Schedule\nType Voltag Description Manufacturer Catalogue No. Lamp Mounting Type\n1 120 Heavy duty industrial Holophane 7200-4-12-LT 2-40W R.S. Pendant with\n4-foot fluorescent T12, OF chains and surface\nfixture with 2 lamps Fluorescent starting mount\nwith low temp Prismatite or equal. (48\")\nelectronic starting\nballast(s).\n2 120 Standby light NiCaD Holophane CI-6N-25-W- 2-12 watts Wall mount\nbattery operated. WCHY-2 Cortez Al6-volt\nHalogen\n3 120 WallPack wall mount Holophane WallPack WL2K- 1-70W HPS Wall mount\nHPS with integral 070HP-12-BK-Fl-\nphotocell. LAMP-PC\n4 120 Pole mount outdoor Holophane Predator Floodlight 250-watt Pole mount round\nflood wet location PF-250HP-12-K-W- HPS tapered steel\nduty. Single and 1-B-CR2 poles, single and\ndouble 2U 2U configurations\nconfiguration as SPRT20J/l/SG\nindicated. * SPRT2OJ/2/SG\n5 120 Crestwood outdoor Holophane Crestwood CW-24- 1-150W Round tapered\npost light with HPS P5AHP-12-GR-CA HPS steel galvanized\nfixture and cover* pole 10 foot\nSPRTIOJ/SG\nNote: *Install added vertical light cutoff \"shades.\"\nAppendix 4D.333\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI SECTION 16055 -PIPE HEAT TRACING SCHED. B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 Submittals-Approval Required\n4 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n5 Product Data: Manufacturer's descriptive literature.\n6 Plastic Pipe Installations: Output adjustment factors for heating tape for the services indicated.\n7 Pipe heat loss calculations for each pipe size to be heat traced.\n8 Submittals-Approval Not Required:\n9 Information/Record (IR):\n10 Field Testing: Submit inspection/test report on insulation resistance per CONSTRUCTION QUALITY\n11 CONTROL section of this Specification.\n12 Part 2 -Products\n13 System Design Requirements\n14 Design Heating Load:\n15 Heating load to be calculated based upon a 100-degree F delta, 20 mph wind if pipes are located\n16 outdoors, insulation as specified in Section 15060, PIPING-GENERAL, and shall include a\n17 10 percent safety factor.\n18 Heat loss calculations shall be based on IEEE 515, Equation 1, Page 19.\n19 Electrical Heating Tape\n20 Cable: Auto-trace, self-limiting, parallel circuit construction consisting of continuous inner core of\n21 variable resistance conductive heating material between two parallel copper bus wires. Provide tinned\n22 copper braid for PVC, FRP, and stainless steel pipe applications.\n23 UL Listing: Listed as self-limiting pipe tracing material for pipe freeze protection application in ordinary\n24 conditions.\n25 Maximum Maintenance Temperature: 150 degrees F (65 degrees C).\n26 Maximum Intermittent Temperature: 185 degrees F (85 degrees C).\n27 Minimum Maintenance Temperature: Minus 40 degrees F (-40 degrees C).\n28 Service Voltage: As indicated by branch circuits provided for heat tracing on the Drawings. All heat\n29 trace circuits shall be powered by ground fault interrupter type (GFEP) circuit breakers (30 mA).\n30 Manufacturers and Products:\n31 Raychem; Chemelex BTV or BRV-C.\n32 Thermon; FLX-BC or FLX-OJ.\n33 Nelson; CLl-JI or LI-Jl.\n34 Connection System\n35 Rating: NEMA 250, Type 4 and Factory Mutual approved.\n36 Operating Monitor Light: Furnish with each circuit power connection kit to indicate when heat tracing\n37 is energized.\n38 Manufacturers and Products:\nAppendix 4D.334\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Power Connection Kit:\n2 Raychem; Chemelex AM-BC.\n3 Thermon; PCA-COM.\n4 Nelson; PLT-BC.\n5 Splice Kit:\n6 Raychem; Chemelex AM-BS.\n7 Thermon; PCS-COM.\n8 Nelson; PLT-BS.\n9 Tee Kit:\n10 Raychem; Chemelex AM-B4.\n11 Thermon; Tee Snap.\n12 Nelson; PLT-BY.\n13 End Seal Kit:\n14 Raychem; Chemelex AM-E.\n15 Thermon; ET-6C or ET-8C.\n16 Nelson; LT-ME.\n17 Pilot Light:\n18 Raychem; Chemelex AM-L.\n19 Thermon; VIL-4C.\n20 Nelson; LT-L.\n21 Pipe Adapter Kit:\n22 Raychem; Chemelex AM-P or AM-T.\n23 Thermon; included with power connection kit.\n24 Nelson; LT-P.\n25 Securing Tape\n26 Plastic Piping Systems:\n27 Type: Aluminum foil coated adhesive tape.\n28 Manufacturers and Products:\n29 Raychem; Chemelex AT-180.\n30 Thermon; AL-20P.\n31 Nelson; AT-50.\n32 Metallic Piping Systems:\n33 Type: Glass or polyester cloth pressure sensitive tape.\n34 Manufacturers and Products:\n35 Raychem; Chemelex GS54 or GT66.\n36 Thermon; PF-1.\n37 Nelson; GT-6 or GT-60.\n38 Ambient Thermostat\nAppendix 4D.335\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Type: Adjustable setting (15 to 140 degrees F), set to 40 degrees F, so as to switch cable off when\n2 ambient temperature exceeds 40 degrees F.\n3 Sensor: Fluid-filled probe.\n4 Enclosure: Epoxy-coated NEMA 250, Type 4X aluminum enclosure with exposed hardware of stainless\n5 steel.\n6 Switch: SP-DT, UL or FM listed, rated 22 amps, 125 to 250V ac.\n7 Manufacturers and Products:\n8 Raychem; Chemelex Model AMC-1A.\n9 Thermon; B4X-15140.\n10 Nelson; TX-4X140.\n11 Part 3 -Execution\n12 Installation\n13 General:\n14 Install in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and recommended practices.\n15 Provide insulation as specified in Section 15060, PIPING-GENERAL, over all pipe heat tracing.\n16 Ground metallic structures or materials used for support of heating cable or on which it is installed in\n17 accordance with applicable codes.\n18 Wiring between power connection points of heat tracing cable branch lines shall be provided by heat\n19 tracing system supplier.\n20 Provide end of circuit pilot lights on heat tracing circuits for buried piping.\n21 Electrical Heating Tape:\n22 Determine required length of electrical heating tape by considering length of circuit, number and type\n23 of fittings and fixtures, design heating load, and heating tape output.\n24 Where design heating load exceeds heating tape capacity, install by spiraling.\n25 Derate heating tape capacity when installed on plastic piping.\n26 Install on services as follows (reference Drawings H-2-830854, Sheets 2 and 4):\nAppendix 4D.336\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nService Piping Material Placement Location\nCell No. 1 3\" LH-030-HDPE Heat trace and insulate exposed Cell No. I and Cell\nportion of piping from tank inlet No. 2\nconnection to about 2 feet below\ngrade.\nCell No. 2 3\" LH-030-HDPE Leachate Storage\nTank(s) Process Inlet\nConnections.\nCell No. 1 4\" LT-034-PVC Heat trace and insulate exposed Cell No. I and Cell\nportion of piping from tank inlet No. 2\nconnection to about 2 feet below\ngrade.\nCell No. 2 4\" LT-034-PVC Connections Outlet\nCell No. 1 4\" LH-045-HDPE Heat trace and insulate exposed Cell No. I and Cell\nportion of piping from tank inlet No. 2\nCell No. 2 4\" LH-045-HDPE Connection to about 2 feet below Leachate Storage\ngrade. Tank(s) Process Inlet\nConnections.\nCell No. 1 4\"LT-037-HDPE Heat trace and insulate exposed Cell No. I and Cell\nportion of piping from above grade No. 2 Truck\nCell No. 2 4\"LT-037-HDPE Connection fittings to about 2 feet Loading Station(s)\nbelow grade, including 8\" Process to Truck\ncontainment piping. Connections.\n1 Wrap heat trace cable once every 33 inches under pipe insulation. Install additional heating tape at bolted\n2 flanges, valves, pipe supports, and other fittings and fixtures as recommended by supplier, but not less\n3 than the following:\nItem Heating Tape Length (min. feet)\nBolted flanges (per pair) Two times pipe diameter\nValves Four times valve length\nPipe hanger or support penetrating insulation Three times pipe diameter\n4 Heat Tracing Circuits: Limit individual lengths of heat tracing circuits such that maximum single circuit\n5 capacity is 20 amps when starting the circuit at 40 degrees F. Provide multiple 20-amp circuits as\n6 required at individual heat tracing locations.\n7 Thermostats: Install in accordance with manufacturer's instructions and as approved by Engineer.\n8 For each group of heat traced circuit, install one ambient thermostat.\n9 Construction Quality Control\n10 In accordance with Section 16080, ELECTRICAL TESTING, and as specified herein.\nAppendix 4D.337\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Test each circuit with 500-volt insulation tester between circuit and ground with neutrals isolated from\n2 ground.\n3 Insulation Resistance: Minimum 1,000 megohms per 1,000 feet.\n4 END OF SECTION 16055\nAppendix 4D.338\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 16080 -ELECTRICAL TESTING SCHED. A &B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 Fluor Hanford Electrical Utilities (FH EU) shall test pad mounted transformer and conductors rated above\n4 600 volts. Construction General Contractor shall coordinate FH EU testing with Construction Manager.\n5 Onsite testing shall be required for each major electrical system as specified herein in the presence of\n6 representatives for the authority having jurisdiction (AHJ). Tests shall be performed to demonstrate that\n7 each function is implemented and operational. These tests are electrical component tests to be performed\n8 in advance of facility-wide construction acceptance testing (CAT). CAT shall be performed in\n9 accordance with Division requirements.\n10 Provide personnel and equipment in support of Section 13401, PROCESS INSTRUMENTATION AND\n11 CONTROL SYSTEMS (PICS), Operation Readiness (ORT) and Performance Acceptance (PAT) testing.\n12 Approval By Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ)\n13 As specified in Section 16005, ELECTRICAL.\n14 Submiftals-Approval Required\n15 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n16 Qualifications: Submit Testing Firm Qualifications as specified herein.\n17 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n18 Information/Record (IR):\n19 Submit 30 days prior to performing inspections or tests:\n20 Schedule for performing inspection and tests.\n21 List of references to be used for each test.\n22 Sample copy of equipment and materials inspection form(s).\n23 Sample copy of individual device test form.\n24 Sample copy of individual system test form.\n25 Submit within 30 days after completion of test:\n26 Test or inspection reports and certificates for each electrical item tested.\n27 Operation and Maintenance Data:\n28 After test or inspection reports and certificates have been reviewed by Engineer and returned, insert a\n29 copy of each in operation and maintenance manual.\n30 Testing Firm Qualifications\n31 Employer of engineers and technicians regularly engaged in testing and inspecting of electrical\n32 equipment, installations, and systems.\n33 Supervising engineer accredited as Certified Electrical Test Technologist by National Institute for\n34 Certification of Engineering Technologists (NICET), or International Electrical Testing Association and\n35 having a minimum of 5 years' testing experience on similar projects.\n36 Technicians certified by NICET or NETA.\n37 Registered professional engineer to provide comprehensive project report outlining services performed,\n38 results of such services, recommendations, actions taken, and opinions.\n39 In compliance with OSHA Title 29, Part 1907 criteria for accreditation of testing laboratories.\nAppendix 4D.339\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Sequencinq And Scheduling\n2 Perform inspection and electrical tests after equipment has been installed. Construction General\n3 Contractor shall coordinate NEC required inspections and Fluor Hanford Electrical Utilities (FH EU)\n4 required testing and inspections with Construction Manager. Tank Farm Contractor will provide services\n5 of an NEC inspector.\n6 Perform tests with apparatus de-energized whenever feasible.\n7 Inspection and electrical tests on energized equipment are to be:\n8 Scheduled with Construction Manager prior to de-energization.\n9 Minimized to avoid extended period of interruption to the operating plant equipment.\n10 Notify Construction Manager at least 24 hours prior to performing tests on energized electrical\n11 equipment.\n12 Part 2 -Products\n13 Test Equipment/instrumentation Requirements:\n14 Test equipment shall have an operating accuracy equal to, or greater than, requirements established by\n15 NETA ATS.\n16 Test instrument calibration shall be in accordance with NETA ATS.\n17 Part 3 -Execution\n18 General:\n19 Tests and inspection shall establish that:\n20 Electrical equipment is operational within industry and manufacturer's tolerances.\n21 Installation operates properly.\n22 Equipment is suitable for energization.\n23 Installation conforms to requirements of Contract Documents and NFPA 70, NFPA 70E, and\n24 ANSI C2.\n25 Perform inspection and testing in accordance with NETA ATS, industry standards, and\n26 manufacturer's recommendations.\n27 Adjust mechanisms and moving parts for free mechanical movement.\n28 Adjust adjustable relays and sensors to correspond to operating conditions, or as recommended by\n29 manufacturer.\n30 Verify nameplate data for conformance to Contract Documents.\n31 Realign equipment not properly aligned and correct unlevelness.\n32 Properly anchor electrical equipment found to be inadequately anchored.\n33 Tighten accessible bolted connections, including wiring connections, with calibrated torque wrench to\n34 manufacturer's recommendations, or as otherwise specified.\n35 Clean contaminated surfaces with cleaning solvents as recommended by manufacturer.\n36 Provide proper lubrication of applicable moving parts.\n37 Inform Construction Manager of working clearances not in accordance with NFPA 70.\n38 Investigate and repair or replace:\n39 Electrical items that fail tests.\n40 Active components not operating in accordance with manufacturer's instructions.\n41 Damaged electrical equipment.\nAppendix 4D.340\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Electrical Enclosures:\n2 Remove foreign material and moisture from enclosure interior.\n3 Vacuum and wipe clean enclosure interior.\n4 Remove corrosion found on metal surfaces.\n5 Repair or replace, as determined by Construction Manager, door and panel sections having dented\n6 surfaces.\n7 Repair or replace, as determined by Construction Manager, poor fitting doors and panel sections.\n8 Repair or replace improperly operating latching, locking, or interlocking devices.\n9 Replace missing or damaged hardware.\n10 Finish:\n11 Provide matching paint and touch up scratches and mars.\n12 If required due to extensive damage, as determined by Construction Manager, refinish the entire\n13 assembly.\n14 Replace fuses and circuit breakers that do not conform to size and type required by the Contract\n15 Documents.\n16 Dry Type Transformers\n17 Visual and Mechanical Inspection:\n18 Physical and insulator damage.\n19 Proper winding connections.\n20 Bolt torque level in accordance with NETA ATS, Table 10.1, unless otherwise specified by\n21 manufacturer.\n22 Defective wiring.\n23 Proper operation of fans, indicators, and auxiliary devices.\n24 Removal of shipping brackets, fixtures, or bracing.\n25 Free and properly installed resilient mounts.\n26 Cleanliness and improper blockage of ventilation passages.\n27 Verify that tap-changer is set at correct ratio for rated output voltage under normal operating\n28 conditions.\n29 Verify proper secondary voltage phase-to-phase and phase-to-ground after energization and prior to\n30 loading.\n31 Electrical Tests:\n32 Insulation Resistance Tests:\n33 Applied megohmmeter dc voltage in accordance with NETA ATS, Table 7.2.3 for each:\n34 Winding-to-winding.\n35 Winding-to-ground.\n36 10-minute test duration with resistances tabulated at 30 seconds, 1 minute, and 10 minutes.\n37 Results temperature corrected in accordance with NETA ATS, Table 7.2.4.\n38 Temperature corrected insulation resistance values equal to, or greater than, ohmic values established by\n39 manufacturer.\n40 Insulation resistance test results to compare within 1 percent of adjacent windings.\nAppendix 4D.341\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Perform tests and adjustments for fans, controls, and alarm functions as suggested by manufacturer.\n2 Low Voltage Cables, 600 Volts Maximum:\n3 Visual and Mechanical Inspection:\n4 Inspect Each Individual Exposed Power Cable No. 8 and Larger For:\n5 Physical damage.\n6 Proper connections in accordance with single-line diagram.\n7 Cable bends not in conformance with manufacturer's minimum allowable bending radius where\n8 applicable.\n9 Color coding conformance with specifications.\n10 Proper circuit identification.\n11 Mechanical Connections For:\n12 Proper lug type for conductor material.\n13 Proper lug installation.\n14 Bolt torque level in accordance with NETA ATS, Table 10.1, unless otherwise specified by\n15 manufacturer.\n16 Shielded Instrumentation Cables For:\n17 Proper shield grounding.\n18 Proper terminations.\n19 Proper circuit identification.\n20 Continuity test by ohmmeter method to ensure proper cable connections.\n21 Control Cables For:\n22 Proper termination.\n23 Proper circuit identification.\n24 Continuity test by ohmmeter method to ensure proper cable connections.\n25 Cables Terminated Through Window Type CTs: Verify that neutrals and grounds are terminated for\n26 correct operation of protective devices.\n27 Electrical Tests for Conductors No. 8 and Larger:\n28 Insulation Resistance Tests:\n29 Utilize 1,000-volt dc megohmmeter for 600-volt insulated conductors.\n30 Test each conductor with respect to ground and to adjacent conductors per IEEE 118 procedures for\n31 1 minute.\n32 Evaluate ohmic values by comparison with conductors of same length and type.\n33 Investigate values less than 50 megohms.\n34 Continuity test by ohmmeter method to ensure proper cable connections.\n35 Safety Switches, 600 Volts Maximum\n36 Visual and Mechanical Inspection:\n37 Proper blade pressure and alignment.\n38 Proper operation of switch operating handle.\n39 Adequate mechanical support for each fuse.\n40 Proper contact-to-contact tightness between fuse clip and fuse.\nAppendix 4D.342\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Cable connection bolt torque level in accordance with NETA ATS, Table 10.1.\n2 Proper phase barrier material and installation.\n3 Verify that fuse sizes and types correspond to one-line diagram.\n4 Perform mechanical operational test and verify electrical and mechanical interlocking system\n5 operation and sequencing.\n6 Electrical Tests:\n7 Insulation Resistance Tests:\n8 Applied megohmmeter dc voltage in accordance with NETA ATS, Table 10.2.\n9 Phase-to-phase and phase-to-ground for 1 minute on each pole.\n10 Insulation resistance values equal to, or greater than, ohmic values established by manufacturer.\n11 Contact Resistance Tests:\n12 Contact resistance in microhms across each switch blade and fuse holder.\n13 Investigate deviation of 50 percent or more from adjacent poles or similar switches.\n14 Molded And Insulated Case Circuit Breakers\n15 General: Inspection and testing limited to circuit breakers rated 70 amperes and larger and to motor\n16 circuit protector breakers rated 30 amperes and larger.\n17 Visual and Mechanical Inspection:\n18 Proper mounting.\n19 Proper conductor size.\n20 Feeder designation according to nameplate and one-line diagram.\n21 Cracked casings.\n22 Connection bolt torque level in accordance with NETA ATS, Table 10.1.\n23 Operate breaker to verify smooth operation.\n24 Compare frame size and trip setting with circuit breaker schedules or one-line diagram.\n25 Verify that terminals are suitable for 75 degrees C rated insulated conductors.\n26 Electrical Tests:\n27 Insulation Resistance Tests:\n28 Utilize 1,000-volt dc megohmmeter for 480- and 600-volt circuit breakers and 500-volt dc\n29 megohmmeter for 240-volt circuit breakers.\n30 Pole-to-pole and pole-to-ground with breaker contacts opened for 1 minute\n31 Pole-to-pole and pole-to-ground with breaker contacts closed for 1 minute.\n32 Test values to comply with NETA ATS, Table 10.2.\n33 Contact Resistance Tests:\n34 Contact resistance in microhms across each pole.\n35 Investigate deviation of 50 percent or more from adjacent poles and similar breakers.\n36 Current Injection Test to Verify:\n37 Long-time minimum pickup and delay.\n38 Short-time pickup and delay.\nAppendix 4D.343\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Instantaneous pickup by run-up or pulse method.\n2 Trip characteristics of adjustable trip breakers shall be within manufacturer's published time-current\n3 characteristic tolerance band, including adjustment factors.\n4 Trip times shall be within limits established by NEMA AB 4, Table 5-3.\n5 Instantaneous pickup value shall be within values established by NEMA AB 4, Table 5-4.\n6 Instrument Transformers\n7 Visual and Mechanical Inspection:\n8 Visually Check Current, Potential, and Control Transformers For:\n9 Cracked insulation.\n10 Broken leads or defective wiring.\n11 Proper connections.\n12 Adequate clearances between primary and secondary circuit wiring.\n13 Verify Mechanically That:\n14 Grounding and shorting connections have good contact.\n15 Withdrawal mechanism and grounding operation, when applicable, operate properly.\n16 Verify proper primary and secondary fuse sizes for potential transformers.\n17 Electrical Tests:\n18 Current Transformer Tests:\n19 Insulation resistance test of transformer and wiring-to-ground at 1,000 volts dc for 30 seconds.\n20 Polarity test.\n21 Potential Transformer Tests:\n22 Insulation resistance test at test voltages in accordance with NETA ATS, Table 7.1.1 for 1 minute on:\n23 Winding-to-winding.\n24 Winding-to-ground.\n25 Polarity test to verify polarity marks or H 1 -X1 relationship as applicable.\n26 Insulation resistance measurement on instrument transformer shall not be less than that shown in\n27 NETA ATS, Table 7.1.1.\n28 Utility Meterinq:\n29 Testing to be conducted by FH EU.\n30 Grounding Systems:\n31 Visual and Mechanical Inspection:\n32 Equipment and circuit grounds in motor control center and panelboard assemblies for proper\n33 connection and tightness.\n34 Ground bus connections in motor control center and panelboard assemblies for proper termination\n35 and tightness.\n36 Effective transformer core and equipment grounding.\n37 Accessible connections to grounding electrodes for proper fit and tightness.\n38 Accessible exothermic-weld grounding connections to verify that molds were fully filled and proper\n39 bonding was obtained.\nAppendix 4D.344\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Electrical Tests:\n2 Fall-Of-Potential Test:\n3 In accordance with IEEE 81, Section 8.2.1.5 for measurement of main ground system's resistance.\n4 Main ground electrode system resistance to ground to be no greater than 3 ohms.\n5 Two-Point Direct Method Test:\n6 In accordance with IEEE 81, Section 8.2.1.1 for measurement of ground resistance between main ground\n7 system, equipment frames, and system neutral and derived neutral points.\n8 Equipment ground resistance shall not exceed main ground system resistance by 0.25 ohm.\n9 AC Induction Motors\n10 General: Inspection and testing limited to motors rated 1/3 hp and larger.\n11 Visual and Mechanical Inspection:\n12 Proper electrical and grounding connections.\n13 Shaft alignment.\n14 Blockage of ventilating air passageways.\n15 Operate Motor and Check For:\n16 Excessive mechanical and electrical noise.\n17 Overheating.\n18 Correct rotation.\n19 Check vibration detectors, resistance temperature detectors, or motor inherent protectors for\n20 functionability and proper operation.\n21 Excessive vibration.\n22 Check operation of space heaters.\n23 Electrical Tests:\n24 Insulation Resistance Tests:\n25 In accordance with IEEE 43 at test voltages established by NETA ATS, Table 10.2 for:\n26 Motors 200 hp and less for 1-minute duration with resistances tabulated at 30 and 60 seconds.\n27 Insulation resistance values equal to, or greater than, ohmic values established by manufacturers.\n28 Insulation resistance test on insulated bearings in accordance with manufacturer's instructions.\n29 Measure running current and voltage, and evaluate relative to load conditions and nameplate full-load\n30 amperes.\n31 Low Voltage Motor Control\n32 Visual and Mechanical Inspection:\n33 Proper barrier and shutter installation and operation.\n34 Proper operation of indicating and monitoring devices.\n35 Proper overload protection for each motor.\n36 Improper blockage of air cooling passages.\n37 Proper operation of drawout elements.\n38 Integrity and contamination of bus insulation system.\nAppendix 4D.345\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Check Breaker and Kirk Key Interlocking System By:\n2 Closure attempt of breaker when associated Kirk key is in place.\n3 Open attempt of breaker when associated Kirk key is in place.\n4 Closure attempt of breaker when associated Kirk key is not in place.\n5 Open attempt of breaker when associated Kirk key is not in place.\n6 Check Door and Device Interlocking System By:\n7 Closure attempt of device when door is in OFF or OPEN position.\n8 Opening attempt of door when device is in ON or CLOSED position.\n9 Check Nameplates for Proper Identification Of:\n10 Equipment title and tag number with latest one-line diagram.\n11 Control switches.\n12 Pilot lights.\n13 Control relays.\n14 Circuit breakers.\n15 Verify that fuse and circuit breaker sizes and types conform to Contract Documents.\n16 Verify that current and potential transformer ratios conform to Contract Documents.\n17 Check Bus Connections for High Resistance by Low Resistance Ohmmeter: Ohmic value to be zero.\n18 Check Operation and Sequencing of Electrical and Mechanical Interlock Systems By:\n19 Closure attempt for locked open devices.\n20 Opening attempt for locked closed devices.\n21 Key exchange to operate devices in OFF-NORMAL positions.\n22 Verify performance of each control device and feature furnished as part of the motor control center.\n23 Control Wiring:\n24 Compare wiring to local and remote control, and protective devices with elementary diagrams.\n25 Check for proper conductor lacing and bundling.\n26 Check for proper conductor identification.\n27 Check for proper conductor lugs and connections.\n28 Exercise active components.\n29 Inspect Contactors For:\n30 Correct mechanical operations.\n31 Correct contact gap, wipe, alignment, and pressure.\n32 Correct torque of all connections.\n33 Compare overload settings and voltage ratings with full-load current for proper size.\n34 Compare fuse motor protector and circuit breaker with motor characteristics for proper size.\n35 Electrical Tests:\n36 Insulation Resistance Tests:\n37 Applied megohmmeter dc voltage in accordance with NETA ATS, Table 10.2.\n38 Bus section phase-to-phase and phase-to-ground for 1 minute on each phase.\n39 Contactor phase-to-ground and across open contacts for 1 minute on each phase.\nAppendix 4D.346\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Starter section phase-to-phase and phase-to-ground on each phase with starter contacts closed and\n2 protective devices open.\n3 Test values to comply with NETA ATS, Table 10.2.\n4 Overpotential Tests:\n5 Maximum applied ac or dc voltage in accordance with NETA ATS, Table 7.1.2.\n6 Phase-to-phase and phase-to-ground for 1 minute for each phase of each bus section.\n7 Test results evaluated on pass/fail basis.\n8 Current Injection Through Overload Unit at 300 Percent of Motor Full-Load Current and Monitor\n9 Trip Time:\n10 Trip time in accordance with manufacturer's published data.\n11 Investigate values in excess of 120 seconds.\n12 Control Wiring Tests:\n13 Apply secondary voltage to control power and potential circuits.\n14 Check voltage levels at each point on terminal boards and each device terminal.\n15 Insulation resistance test at 1,000 volts dc on control wiring except that connected to solid state\n16 components.\n17 Insulation resistance to be I megohm minimum.\n18 Operational test by initiating control devices to affect proper operation.\n19 Low Voltage Surqe Arrestors\n20 Visual and Mechanical Inspection:\n21 Adequate clearances between arrestors and enclosures.\n22 Ground connections to ground bus and electrode.\n23 Electrical Tests:\n24 Varistor Type Arrestors:\n25 Clamping voltage test.\n26 Rated RMS voltage test.\n27 Rated dc voltage test.\n28 Varistor arrestor test values in accordance with ANSI C62.33, Sections 4.4 and 4.7.\n29 END OF SECTION 16080\nAppendix 4D.347\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 16270 -OIL-FILLED PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMERS SCHED. A\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 References\n4 The following is a list of standards, which may be referenced in this section:\n5 AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANSI)\n6 ANSI C57.12.00 Standard General Requirements for Liquid-Immersed Distribution, Power, and\n7 Regulating Transformers\n8 ANSI C57.12.22 Pad-Mounted, Compartmental-Type, Self-Cooled, Three-Phase Distribution\n9 Transformers with High-Voltage Bushings, 2,500 kVA and Smaller\n10 ANSI C57.12.26 Pad-Mounted, Compartmental-Type, Self-Cooled, Three-Phase Distribution\n11 Transformers for Use with Separable Insulated High Voltage Connectors\n12 ANSI C57.12.28 Switchgear and Transformers -Pad-Mounted Equipment, Enclosure Integrity\n13 ANSI C57.12.90 Standard Test Code for Liquid Immersed Distribution, Power, and Regulating\n14 Transformers\n15 ANSI 386 Standard for Separable Insulated Connector Systems for Power Distribution\n16 Systems Above 600V\n17 INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS, INC. (IEEE)\n18 IEEE C62.11 Metal-Oxide Surge Arrestors for Alternating-Current Power Circuits (>1 KV)\n19 Submittals-Approval Required\n20 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n21 Product Data:\n22 Descriptive information.\n23 Dimensional drawings.\n24 Transformer nameplate data.\n25 Schematic and connection diagrams.\n26 Factory test reports certified.\n27 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n28 Information/Record (IR):\n29 Operation and maintenance data.\n30 Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for Envirotemp FR3TM Fluid.\n31 Submit documentation and test results from construction quality control testing.\n32 Extra Materials\n33 Furnish, tag, and box for shipment and storage and deliver prior to 30 percent Project completion the\n34 following spare parts, special tools, and materials:\n35 One quart of paint to match color and quality of equipment final shop finish.\n36 Two spare fuse links for each fuse size.\nAppendix 4D.348\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Part 2 -Products\n2 Source Quality Control (Factory Tests)\n3 Design, test, and assemble in accordance with applicable standards of ANSI C57.12.00, C57.12.22,\n4 C57.12.26, and C57.12.90.\n5 Production tests in accordance with ANSI C57.12.90 and C57.12.00, Section 8 and Table 16.\n6 Dielectric test in accordance with ANSI C57.12.26.\n7 Manufacturers\n8 Cooper Power System.\n9 Cutler-Hammer.\n10 Square D Co.\n11 General Electric.\n12 General\n13 Integral Unit: Compartmental type unit consisting of transformer, oil-filled tank, and high and low\n14 voltage terminating compartments, assembled on a common structural base.\n15 Anchor Bolts: Type 316 stainless steel, sized by equipment manufacturer, and as specified in\n16 Section 05500, METAL FABRICATIONS AND CASTINGS.\n17 Transformer\n18 kVARating: 112.5.\n19 Primary Voltage: 13.8 kV line-to-line, three-phase, 60 Hz.\n20 Secondary Voltage: 480/277 volts, three-phase, four-wire, 60 Hz.\n21 BIL Rating:\n22 95 BIL for 15 kV insulation class transformers.\n23 30 BIL for secondary.\n24 Temperature Rise: 65 degrees C above 30 degrees average ambient with maximum ambient not to\n25 exceed 40 degrees C.\n26 Impedance: 3.2 percent.\n27 Coolant: Normally formulated, hydro-refined oil free of PCB chemical, FMRC approved, UL classified\n28 less-flammable Envirotemp FR3, in accordance with FMRC 3990. Fluid shall have a minimum open cup\n29 fire point of 350 degrees C and a minimum 5-day BOD (SM5210B) of 200 ppm. Manufacturer is to\n30 provide information on the transformers nameplate that it is \"NON-PCB\" along with \"manufacturer's\n31 name and type of insulating fluid.\"\n32 Primary Taps:\n33 Full capacity, two 2-1/2 percent below and two 2-1/2 percent above, rated voltage.\n34 Externally operated no-load tap changer.\n35 Provisions for locking handle in any position.\n36 Coil Conductors: Copper windings.\n37 Delta-wye transformers wound on triplex cores.\n38 Sound Level: In accordance with manufacturer's standards.\nAppendix 4D.349\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Enclosure\n2 In accordance with ANSI C57.12.28 requirements.\n3 Welded carbon steel transformer tank, with cooling panels when required, and lifting eyes.\n4 12-gauge sheet steel terminal compartment enclosure having no exposed screws, bolts, or other fasteners\n5 that are externally removable.\n6 Corrosion Protection and Color: Base(s) and cabinet(s) of the transformer shall be corrosion resistant\n7 and shall be fabricated of steel. Provide insulating and corrosion resistance undercoating on base of\n8 transformer. Paint bases, cabinets, and tanks Munsell 7GY3.29/1.5 green. The Munsell color notation is\n9 specified in ASTM D1535.\n10 Terminal Compartments\n11 General: ANSI C57.12.28, enclosed high and low voltage compartments side by side, separated by steel\n12 barrier, bolted to transformer tank.\n13 Doors:\n14 Individual, full-height, air-filled.\n15 Low voltage door with three-point latching mechanism, vault type handle, and single padlocking\n16 provision.\n17 High voltage door fastenings inaccessible until low voltage door has been opened.\n18 Door Bolts:\n19 Hex-head type.\n20 Lift-off, stainless steel hinges and door stops.\n21 Removable front sill to facilitate rolling or skidding over conduit stub ups.\n22 Recessed lock pocket, with steel door release bolt adjacent to secondary compartment door handle.\n23 High Voltage Compartment:\n24 Deadfront in accordance with ANSI C57.12.26 type construction.\n25 Protective fuses.\n26 High voltage bushings.\n27 Transformer grounding pad.\n28 Surge arrestors with barriers.\n29 Four-position, oil-immersed type switch to permit closed transit in loop feed and sectionalizing\n30 position sectionalizing load-break switch.\n31 Parking stands.\n32 Low Voltage Compartment:\n33 Livefront in accordance with ANSI C57.12.26 type construction.\n34 Low voltage bushings.\n35 Grounding pad.\n36 Stainless steel equipment nameplate.\n37 Liquid level gauge.\n38 1-inch upper filter press and filling plug.\n39 Drain valve with sampling device.\n40 Dial type thermometer.\n41 Pressure relief valve.\nAppendix 4D.350\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Pressure relief device, self-resealing with indicator.\n2 Pressure-vacuum gauge.\n3 Mounting provision for current and potential transformers.\n4 Nameplate per Nameplate C, Table 9, IEEE C57.12.00.\n5 Bushings\n6 High Voltage:\n7 Deadfront Termination:\n8 Universal bushing well rated at 15 kV in accordance with ANSI 386.\n9 Bushings externally clamped and front removable.\n10 Rated for 200 amperes continuous, 95 kV BIL.\n11 Standoff brackets located adjacent to bushings.\n12 Low Voltage:\n13 Molded epoxy bushing clamped to tank with 4 hole spade type terminals.\n14 Rated 150 percent of continuous full-load current, 30 BIL, 600 volts.\n15 Internally connected neutral extending to neutral bushing.\n16 High Voltage Switching\n17 Internal, oil-immersed, gang-operated load-break, manually operated switches.\n18 Hot stick operated handle located in high voltage compartment.\n19 Capable of operating at full-load current.\n20 Feed Switch: Four-position, oil-immersed type switch to permit closed transition loop feed and\n21 sectionalizing. Switch shall be rated at 15 kV, 95 kV BIL, with a continuous current rating and\n22 load-break rating of 200 amperes, and a make-and-latch rating of 10,000 rms amperes symmetrical. The\n23 switch handle shall be located in the high-voltage compartment and lockable in the ON/OFF position.\n24 Switch shall be similar to the Cooper Power Systems, Electrical Apparatus 800-64, Sectionalizing\n25 Switches, \"T\" blade switch.\n26 High Voltage Protection\n27 Combination Oil-Immersed Bayonet Expulsion and Current Limiting Fuses:\n28 Accessibility:\n29 Bayonet expulsion fuse accessible through primary compartment.\n30 Current-limiting fuse accessible through tank handhole.\n31 Expulsion Fuse for Low Current Faults: Interrupting capacity of 1,800 amperes rms asymmetrical.\n32 Current Limiting for High Current Faults:\n33 Interrupting capacity of 50,000 amperes rms symmetrical.\n34 Bayonet fuse externally replaceable with hot stick.\n35 Bayonet fuse links shall be dual sensing for both high currents and high oil temperature in order to\n36 provide thermal protection to the transformer.\n37 Coordinate transformer protection with expulsion fuse clearing low-current faults and current-limiting\n38 fuse clearing high-current faults beyond the interrupting rating of the expulsion fuse.\n39 In order to eliminate or minimize oil spills, the bayonet fuse assembly shall include an oil retention\n40 valve inside the housing, which closes when the fuse holder is removed and an external drip shield.\nAppendix 4D.351\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Warning shall be conspicuously displayed within the high-voltage compartment cautioning against\n2 removing or inserting fuses unless the load-break switch is in the OPEN position and the tank\n3 pressure has been released.\n4 Bayonet Fuse Assembly: 150 kV BIL.\n5 Oil-Immersed Current-Limiting Fuses: NEMA C37.47; 50,000 rms amperes symmetrical interrupting\n6 rating at the system voltage specified.\n7 Surge Arrestors\n8 Metal-Oxide, Varistor Type:\n9 Insulated body, elbow type, 18 kV in accordance with IEEE C62.11.\n10 Installed in high voltage compartment.\n11 Connected to transformer high voltage bushing wells.\n12 Tank Grounding Pads\n13 Low Voltage Compartments:\n14 Connected together with bare No. 2/0 stranded copper conductors.\n15 Wye low voltage neutral internally connected with link and brought out to insulated low voltage\n16 bushing externally grounded to tank.\n17 Low voltage neutral connected to externally mounted insulating bushing in low voltage compartment\n18 and grounded to tank with removable strap.\n19 Tap Changer Warning Sign\n20 Red laminated plastic, engraved to white core.\n21 Engrave to read DO NOT OPERATE WHEN TRANSFORMER ENERGIZED.\n22 Mount above tap changer handle.\n23 Part 3 -Execution\n24 General\n25 Prepare subgrade for utility vault for pad mounted transformer as specified in Section 02319,\n26 SUBGRADE PREPARATION, paragraph \"Prepared Subgrade for Roadway, Embankment and\n27 Structures.\"\n28 Secure to mounting pads with anchor bolts.\n29 Install plumb and longitudinally in alignment with pad or adjacent building wall.\n30 Ground neutrals and enclosures in accordance with applicable codes and as shown on the Drawings.\n31 Construction Quality Control\n32 In accordance with Section 16080, ELECTRICAL TESTING.\n33 Adjustments\n34 Adjust voltage taps to obtain rated output voltage under normal operating load conditions.\n35 END OF SECTION 16270\n36\nAppendix 4D.352\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 16270-1 -SINGLE PHASE OIL-FILLED PAD MOUNTED TRANSFORMERS\n2 SCHED. B\n3 Part 1 -General\n4 References\n5 The following is a list of standards which may be referenced in this section:\n6 AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANSI)\n7 ANSI C57.12.00 Standard General Requirements for Liquid-Immersed Distribution, Power, and\n8 Regulating Transformers\n9 ANSI C57.12.21 Pad-Mounted, Compartmental-Type, Self-Cooled, Single-Phase Distribution\n10 Transformers with High-Voltage Bushings, 167 kVA and Smaller\n11 ANSI C57.12.25 Pad-Mounted, Compartmental-Type, Self-Cooled, Single-Phase Distribution\n12 Transformers for Use with Separable Insulated High Voltage Connectors\n13 ANSI C57.12.28 Switchgear and Transformers -Pad-Mounted Equipment, Enclosure Integrity\n14 ANSI C57.12.90 Standard Test Code for Liquid Immersed Distribution, Power, and Regulating\n15 Transformers\n16 ANSI 386 Standard for Separable Insulated Connector Systems for Power Distribution\n17 Systems Above 600V\n18 INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS, INC. (IEEE)\n19 Submittals-Approval Required\n20 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n21 Product Data:\n22 Descriptive information.\n23 Dimensional drawings.\n24 Transformer nameplate data.\n25 Schematic and connection diagrams..\n26 Factory test reports certified.\n27 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n28 Information/Record (IR):\n29 Operation and maintenance data, including recommended preventative maintenance tasks and\n30 frequencies for performance of those tasks.\n31 Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for Envirotemp FR3TM Fluid.\n32 Submit documentation and test results from construction quality control testing.\n33 Extra Materials\n34 Furnish, tag, and box for shipment and storage and deliver prior to 30 percent Project completion.\n35 Part 2 -Products\n36 Source Quality Control (Factory Tests)\n37 Design, test, and assemble in accordance with applicable standards of ANSI C57.12.00, C57.12.21,\n38 C57.12.25, and C57.12.90.\n39 Production tests in accordance with ANSI C57.12.90, Section 8 and Table 16.\nAppendix 4D.353\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Dielectric test in accordance with ANSI C57.12.25.\n2 Manufacturers\n3 Cooper Power System; Maxishrub type.\n4 ABB.\n5 General\n6 Integral Unit: Compartmental type unit consisting of transformer, oil-filled tank, and high and low\n7 voltage terminating compartment, assembled on a common base.\n8 Anchor Bolts: Type 316 stainless steel, sized by equipment manufacturer, and as specified in\n9 Section 05500, METAL FABRICATIONS AND CASTINGS.\n10 Transformer\n11 kVA Rating: 75.\n12 Primary Voltage: 13.8 kV line-to-line, single-phase, 60 Hz.\n13 Secondary Voltage: 120/240 volts, single-phase, three-wire, 60 Hz.\n14 BIL Rating:\n15 95 BIL for 15 kV insulation class transformers.\n16 30 BIL for secondary.\n17 Temperature Rise: 65 degrees C above 30 degrees average ambient with maximum ambient not to\n18 exceed 40 degrees C.\n19 Impedance: 3.2 percent, minimum.\n20 Coolant: Normally formulated, hydro-refined oil free of PCB chemical, FMRC approved, UL classified\n21 less-flammable Envirotemp FR3, in accordance with FMRC 3990. Fluid shall have a minimum open cup\n22 fire point of 350 degrees C and a minimum 5-day BOD (SM5210B) of 200 ppm. Manufacturer is to\n23 provide information on the transformers nameplate that it is \"NON-PCB\" along with \"manufacturer's\n24 name and type of insulating fluid.\"\n25 Primary Taps:\n26 Full capacity, two 2-1/2 percent below and two 2-1/2 percent above, rated voltage.\n27 Externally operated no-load tap changer.\n28 Provisions for locking handle in any position.\n29 Coil Conductors: Copper windings, insulated with B-stage, epoxy coated, diamond pattern insulating\n30 paper, thermally cured under pressure.\n31 Sound Level: In accordance with manufacturer's standards.\n32 Enclosure\n33 In accordance with ANSI C57.12.28 requirements.\n34 Welded carbon steel sealed transformer tank, with domed tank cover , and recessed stainless steel lifting\n35 eyes.\n36 12-gauge sheet steel terminal compartment enclosure having no exposed screws, bolts, or other fasteners\n37 that are externally removable.\n38 Corrosion Protection and Color: Base(s) and cabinet(s) of the transformer shall be corrosion resistant\n39 and shall be fabricated of steel.\nAppendix 4D.354\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Provide insulating and corrosion resistance undercoating on base of transformer. Paint bases, cabinets,\n2 and tanks Munsell 7GY3.29/1.5 green. The Munsell color notation is specified in ASTM D1535.\n3 Terminal Compartment\n4 General: ANSI C57.12.28, enclosed high and low voltage assemblies side by side, bolted to transformer\n5 tank.\n6 Door: Hinged door with stainless steel hinge pins and barrels.\n7 Door Bolts: Recessed, captive, penta head type.\n8 Removable front sill to facilitate rolling or skidding over conduit stub ups.\n9 Floating lock pocket.\n10 High Voltage Assembly:\n11 Deadfront in accordance with ANSI C57.12.25 type construction.\n12 Protective fuses.\n13 High voltage bushings.\n14 Transformer grounding pad.\n15 Surge arrestors with barriers.\n16 Parking stands.\n17 Low Voltage Assembly:\n18 Livefront in accordance with ANSI C57.12.25 type construction.\n19 Low voltage bushings.\n20 Grounding pad.\n21 Stainless steel equipment nameplate.\n22 Liquid level gauge.\n23 Oil filling plug.\n24 Drain valve with sampling device.\n25 Dial type thermometer.\n26 Pressure relief device, self-resealing with indicator.\n27 Pressure-vacuum gauge.\n28 Nameplate per Nameplate A, IEEE C57.12.00.\n29 Bushinqs\n30 High Voltage:\n31 Deadfront Termination:\n32 Universal bushing well rated at 15 kV in accordance with ANSI 386.\n33 Bushings externally clamped and front removable.\n34 Rated for 200 amperes continuous, 95 kV BIL.\n35 Standoff brackets located adjacent to bushings.\n36 Low Voltage:\n37 Molded epoxy bushing clamped to tank with 4 hole spade type terminals.\n38 Rated 150 percent of continuous full-load current, 30 BIL, 600 volts.\nAppendix 4D.355\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 High Voltage Protection\n2 Combination Oil-Immersed Bayonet Expulsion and Current Limiting Fuses:\n3 Accessibility:\n4 Bayonet expulsion fuse accessible through primary compartment.\n5 Current-limiting fuse accessible through tank handhole.\n6 Expulsion Fuse for Low Current Faults: Interrupting capacity of 1,800 amperes rms asymmetrical.\n7 Current Limiting for High Current Faults:\n8 Interrupting capacity of 50,000 amperes rms symmetrical.\n9 Bayonet fuse externally replaceable with hot stick.\n10 Bayonet fuse links shall be dual sensing for both high currents and high oil temperature in order to\n11 provide thermal protection to the transformer.\n12 Coordinate transformer protection with expulsion fuse clearing low-current faults and current-limiting\n13 fuse clearing high-current faults beyond the interrupting rating of the expulsion fuse.\n14 In order to eliminate or minimize oil spills, the bayonet fuse assembly shall include an oil retention\n15 valve inside the housing, which closes when the fuse holder is removed and an external drip shield.\n16 Warning shall be conspicuously displayed within the high-voltage compartment cautioning against\n17 removing or inserting fuses unless the load-break switch is in the OPEN position and the tank ressure\n18 has been released.\n19 Bayonet Fuse Assembly: 150 kV BIL.\n20 Oil-Immersed Current-Limiting Fuses: NEMA C37.47; 50,000 rms amperes symmetrical interrupting\n21 rating at the system voltage specified.\n22 Tank Grounding Pads\n23 Low Voltage Compartment:\n24 Low voltage neutral connected to externally mounted insulating bushing in low voltage compartment and\n25 grounded to tank with removable strap.\n26 Tap Changer Warning Siqn\n27 Red laminated plastic, engraved to white core.\n28 Engrave to read DO NOT OPERATE WHEN TRANSFORMER ENERGIZED.\n29 Mount above tap changer handle.\n30 Adjustments\n31 Adjust voltage taps to obtain rated output voltage under normal operating load conditions.\n32 Part 3 -Execution\n33 General\n34 Prepare subgrade for utility pad mounted transformer as specified in Section 02319, SUBGRADE\n35 PREPARATION, paragraph \"Prepared Subgrade for Roadway, Embankment and Structures.\"\n36 Secure to mounting pads with anchor bolts.\n37 Install plumb and longitudinally in alignment with pad or adjacent building wall.\n38 Ground neutrals and enclosures in accordance with applicable codes and as shown on the Drawings.\nAppendix 4D.356\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Construction Quality Control\n2 In accordance with Section 16080, ELECTRICAL TESTING.\n3 END OF SECTION 16270-1\nAppendix 4D.357\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI SECTION 16312 -OVERHEAD ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION SCHED. A\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 References\n4 The following is a list of standards which may be referenced in this section:\n5 AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTITUTE (ANSI)\n6 ANSI C2 National Electrical Safety Code\n7 ANSI C12.7 Watthour Meter Sockets\n8 ANSI Cl2.10 WatthourMeters\n9 ANSI C 12.11 Instrument Transformers for Revenue Metering, 10 kV BIL Through 350 kV (0.6\n10 kV NSV Through 69 kV NSV)\n11 ANSI C12.13 Electronic Time-of-Use Registers for Electricity Meters\n12 ANSI C12.15 Electricity Metering Solid-State Demand Registers for Electromechanical\n13 Watthour Meters\n14 ANSI C 12.16 Solid-State Electricity Meters\n15 ANSI C29.2 Insulators -Wet-Process Porcelain and Toughened Glass -Suspension Type\n16 ANSI C29.3 Wet Process Porcelain Insulators -Spool Type\n17 ANSI C29.4 Wet-Process Porcelain Insulators -Strain Type\n18 ANSI C29.5 Wet-Process Porcelain Insulators -Low- and Medium-Voltage Types\n19 ANSI C29.6 Wet-Process Porcelain Insulators, High-Voltage Pin Type\n20 ANSI C29.7 Wet Process -Porcelain Insulators -High-Voltage Line-Post Type\n21 ANSI C37.42 High Voltage Expulsion Type Distribution Class Fuses, Cutouts, Fuse\n22 Disconnecting Switches and Fuse Links\n23 ANSI C57.12.20 Transformers -Overhead Type Distribution Transformers, 500 kVA and Smaller:\n24 High-Voltage, 34500 Volts and Below; Low-Voltage, 7970/13800Y Volts and\n25 Below\n26 ANSI C57.12.28 Switchgear and Transformers -Pad-Mounted Equipment -Enclosure Integrity\n27 ANSI 05.1 Wood Poles\n28 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS (ASME)\n29 ASME B 16.11 Forged Fittings, Socket-Welding and Threaded\n30 ASME D3487 Mineral Insulating Oil Used in Electrical Apparatus\n31 AMERICAN WOOD-PRESERVERS' ASSOCIATION (AWPA)\n32 AWPA C All Timber Products -Preservative Treatment by Pressure Processes\n33 AWPA C4 Poles -Preservative Treatment by Pressure Processes\n34 AWPA C25 Crossarms, Pressure Treatment\nAppendix 4D.358\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 ASTM INTERNATIONAL (ASTM)\n2 ASTM A53 Pipe, Steel, Black and Hot-Dipped Zinc-Coated, Welded and Seamless\n3 ASTM A153/A153M Zinc Coating (Hot-Dip) on Iron and Steel Hardware\n4 ASTM A167 Stainless and Heat-Resisting Chromium-Nickel Steel Plate, Sheet, and Strip\n5 ASTM A475 Zinc-Coated Steel Wire Strand\n6 ASTM B I Hard-Drawn Copper Wire\n7 ASTM B2 Medium-Hard-Drawn Copper Wire\n8 ASTM B3 Soft or Annealed Copper Wire\n9 ASTM B8 Concentric-Lay-Stranded Copper Conductors, Hard, Medium-Hard, or Soft\n10 ASTM B228 Concentric-Lay-Stranded Copper-Clad Steel Conductors\n11 ASTM B231/23 IM Concentric-Lay-Stranded Aluminum 1350 Conductors\n12 ASTM B232/B232M Concentric-Lay-Stranded Aluminum Conductors, Coated Steel-Reinforced\n13 (ACSR)\n14 ASTM B397 Concentric-Lay-Stranded Aluminum-Alloy 5005-H19 Conductors\n15 ASTM B399/B399M Concentric-Lay-Stranded Aluminum-Alloy 6201-T81 Conductors\n16 ASTM Dl 17 Electrical Insulating Oils of Petroleum Origin\n17 INSTITUTE OF ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS, INC. (IEEE)\n18 IEEE 48 Standard Test Procedures and Requirements for Alternating-Current Cable\n19 Terminations 2.5 kV through 765kV\n20 IEEE C37.30 High-Voltage Switches\n21 IEEE C37.60 Overhead, Pad Mounted, Dry Vault, and Submersible Automatic Circuit\n22 Reclosers and Fault Interrupters for AC Systems\n23 IEEE C37.63 Overhead, Pad Mounted, Dry-Vault, and Submersible Automatic Line\n24 Sectionalizers for AC Systems\n25 IEEE C57.12.00 General Requirements for Liquid-Immersed Distribution, Power, and\n26 Regulating Transformers\n27 IEEE C57.12.90 Test Code for Liquid-Immersed Distribution, Power, and Regulating\n28 Transformers and Guide for Short-Circuit Testing of Distribution and Power\n29 Transformers\n30 IEEE C57.13 Instrument Transformers\n31 IEEE C62.11 Metal-Oxide Surge Arrestors for Alternating Current Power Circuits\n32 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION (NEMA)\n33 NEMA WC 70 Standard for Non-shielded Power Cables Rated 2000V or Less for the\n34 Distribution of Electrical Energy\n35 INTERNATIONAL ELECTRICAL TESTING ASSOCIATION (NETA)\n36 NETA ATS Electrical Power Distribution Equipment and Systems\n37 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION (NFPA)\n38 NFPA 70 National Electrical Code\nAppendix 4D.359\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE (RUS)\n2 RUS 202-1 List of Materials Acceptable for Use on Systems of RUS Electrification\n3 Borrowers\n4 RUS 1728F-700 Wood Poles, Stubs, and Anchor Logs\n5 RUS 1728H-701 Wood Crossarms (Solid and Laminated Transmission Timbers and Pole\n6 Keys)\n7 UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES INC. (UL)\n8 UL 6 Rigid Metal Conduit\n9 UL 510 Polyvinyl Chloride Polyethylene and Rubber Insulating Tape\n10 Submittals-Approval Required\n11 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n12 Product Data:\n13 Conductors.\n14 Insulators.\n15 Wood poles and crossarms.\n16 Utility vault (reference Section 16005, ELECTRICAL).\n17 Cutouts.\n18 Surge arrestors.\n19 Guy strand and guards.\n20 Anchors and anchor rods.\n21 Ground rods.\n22 Conduit.\n23 Submittals-Approval Not Required:\n24 Information/Record (IR):\n25 Test Reports:\n26 Acceptance checks and tests.\n27 Ground resistance test reports.\n28 Certificates:\n29 Wood poles.\n30 Wood crossarms.\n31 Delivery, Storage, And Handlinq\n32 Pole Line Material Storage:\n33 Poles that will be stored longer than 2 weeks shall be stored on supports at least 1 foot aboveground\n34 in accordance with ANSI 05.1. Strength and spacing of supports, and manner of stacking shall\n35 produce no noticeable distortion in poles.\n36 Construction hooks, tongs, or other sharp tools shall not be used on the treated portion of poles. Do\n37 not use pointed tools capable of producing indentations of more than 1 inch in depth. Nails and holes\n38 are not permitted in the top of poles.\nAppendix 4D.360\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Cable Inspection: Upon delivery to construction site, cable and reels shall be inspected for shipping\n2 damage such as:\n3 Marks caused by improper lifting equipment or techniques.\n4 Breaks or cuts in outer covering.\n5 Damaged jacket or insulation.\n6 Reel damage from mishandling.\n7 Cable Testing: Upon delivery to construction site and prior to installation, Construction General\n8 Contractor shall perform DC over-potential tests on new cable.\n9 Cable Reel Storage:\n10 Reels shall be stored with flanges resting on hard surface or pallets to prevent sinking into the ground.\n11 Reel flanges shall not touch cable on other reels.\n12 Reels shall not be stored on their sides; they shall be stored with reel axis horizontal.\n13 Cable ends shall be taped or capped to prevent entrance of moisture.\n14 Material stored at construction site shall be located to prevent damage from weather and adjacent\n15 construction operations.\n16 Cable Reel Handling:\n17 Slings and forklifts shall not contact cable or protective covering.\n18 A spreader bar shall be used when lifting reel with bar and sling.\n19 Reels shall not be dropped.\n20 Part 2 -Products\n21 Material And Equipment\n22 Consider materials specified herein or shown on Drawings which are identical to materials listed in RUS\n23 202-1 as conforming to requirements.\n24 Wood Pole\n25 Machine trimmed by turning western red cedar, cut from live timber in accordance with ANSI 05.1.\n26 Poles shall be butt-treated by manufacturer in accordance with AWPA C7, using AWPA P8 and P9\n27 preservatives.\n28 Each pole shall be given single top cut at 30-degree angle with normal to axis of pole and at right angles\n29 to sweep. Gains shall be cut so roof will be at right angles to line and sweep of pole will be in line.\n30 Roofs and gains shall be brush-treated by manufacturer with specified preservative. Each gain shall fit\n31 crossarm tightly. Boltholes shall not be more than 1/16 inch oversize.\n32 Quality of each pole shall be ensured with \"WQC\" (wood quality control) brand on each piece, or by an\n33 approved inspection agency report.\n34 Wood Crossarm\n35 Conform to RUS 1728H-701. Straight-gained Douglas fir, free from twists to within 0.1 inch per foot\n36 length, with bends and twists in one direction.\n37 Pressure treat crossarms with pentachlorophenol, chromated copper arsenate (CCA), or ammoniacal\n38 copper arsenite (ACA).\n39 Treatment shall conform to AWPA C25.\n40 Crossarm Braces: Provide wood crossarm braces as indicated.\nAppendix 4D.361\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Hardware\n2 Hot-dip galvanized, conforming to ASTM A153/A153M.\n3 Insulator\n4 Provide wet-process porcelain insulators, which are radio interference free.\n5 Line Post Type Insulators: ANSI C29.7, Class 4.\n6 Suspension Insulators: ANSI C29.2, Quantity one per cable connection assembly, Class 4.\n7 Spool Insulators: ANSI C29.3, Class 53-2.\n8 Guy Strain Insulators: Porcelain, ANSI C29.4, Class 4, except provide fiberglass type when used with\n9 underground terminal or when other interference problems exist.\n10 Pin Insulators: ANSI C29.5, Class 55-5.\n11 Overhead Conductor\n12 Conductor of bare copper, ASTM B1, ASTM B2, and ASTM B3, hard-drawn, medium-hard-drawn, and\n13 soft-drawn, ASTM B8, stranded, aluminum conductor steel reinforced (ACSR), ASTM B232/B232M, of\n14 size and type indicated.\n15 Guys\n16 Guy Strands: ASTM A475, extra-high strength, Class A or B, galvanized strand steel cable. Guy strand\n17 shall be 3/8 inch in diameter with ultimate breaking strength as shown on the Drawings. Provide guy\n18 terminations designed for use with the particular strand and developing at least the ultimate breaking\n19 strength of the strand.\n20 Round Guy Guard: Vinyl or PVC material, yellow colored, 8-feet long, and shatter resistant at sub-zero\n21 temperatures.\n22 Guy Attachment: Thimble eye.\n23 Anchor And Anchor Rod\n24 Anchor shall be concrete cone anchor presenting holding area indicated on Drawings as a minimum.\n25 Anchor rod shall be twin thimble-eye, 3/4-inch diameter by 9-feet long. Anchor and anchor rod shall be\n26 hot-dip galvanized.\n27 Grounding\n28 Rod:\n29 Copper clad steel at least 3/4 inch in diameter and 10 feet long.\n30 Hard, clean, smooth, continuous, surface throughout length of rod.\n31 Die-stamp each near top with name or trademark of manufacturer and length of rod in feet.\n32 Wire:\n33 Soft drawn copper wire ground conductor, minimum No. 4 AWG.\n34 Ground wire protector may be either PVC or half round wood molding. Wood molding shall be fir,\n35 pressure treated in accordance with AWPA C25, or shall be cypress or cedar.\n36 Surge Arrestor\n37 IEEE C62.1 1, metal oxide, polymer housing, surge arrestor arranged for equipment mounting. RMS\n38 voltage rating shall be 18 kV. Arrestor shall be Heavy-Duty Distribution class.\nAppendix 4D.362\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Fused Cutout\n2 Nonloadbreak open type construction rated 100 amperes, 15 kV, 110 kV BIL, with a minimum\n3 10,000 amperes symmetrical interrupting rating conforming to ANSI C37.42.\n4 Fuses shall be of \"6T\" Link type, size as specified by Fluor Hanford Electric Utility (FHEU). Fuse\n5 cutouts shall be equipped with mounting brackets suitable for the indicated installations.\n6 Conduit Riser And Conductor\n7 Rigid galvanized steel conduit conforming to UL 6. Provide conductors (600 volts and above) as\n8 specified in Section 16120, CONDUCTORS.\n9 Porcelain Insulator Type Terminator:\n10 Comply with requirements of IEEE 48, Class 1, except that requirements of design tightness test need\n11 not be met.\n12 Shall not exude any insulating filler compound under either test or service.\n13 Consist of porcelain insulator, copper cable connector-hoodnut assembly and copper aerial lug as\n14 required, metal body and supporting bracket, sealed cable entrance, internal stress relief device for\n15 shielded cable, and insulating filler compound or material.\n16 Electrical Tapes\n17 Tapes shall be UL listed for electrical insulation and other purposes in wire and cable splices.\n18 Termination, repair, and miscellaneous purpose electrical tapes shall comply with UL 510.\n19 Caulkinq Compound\n20 Compound for Sealing Conduit Risers:\n21 Puttylike consistency, workable with hands at temperatures as low as 35 degrees F.\n22 Shall not slump at 300 degrees F and shall not harden materially when exposed to air.\n23 Shall readily caulk or adhere to clean surfaces of material with which it is designed to be used.\n24 Shall have no injurious effects upon workmen or upon materials.\n25 Part 3 -Execution\n26 Installation\n27 General: Provide overhead pole line installation conforming to requirements of ANSI C2 for Grade C\n28 construction of overhead lines in medium loading districts and NFPA 70 for overhead services. Consider\n29 street, alleys, roads and drives \"public.\" Pole configuration shall be as indicated on Drawings.\n30 Pole Setting: Provide pole holes at least as large at top as at bottom and large enough to provide 4 inch\n31 clearance between pole and side of hole.\nAppendix 4D.363\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Pole Setting Depths:\nLength of Pole (feet) Setting in Soil (feet) Setting in Solid Rock (feet)\n20 5.0 3.0\n25 5.5 3.5\n30 5.5 3.5\n35 6.0 4.0\n40 6.0 4.0\n45 6.5 4.5\n50 7.0 4.5\n55 7.5 5.0\n60 8.0 5.0\n2 Setting in Soil, Sand, and Gravel: Applying where the following occurs:\n3 Where pole holes are in soil, sand, or gravel or any combination of these.\n4 Where soil layer over solid rock is more than 2 feet deep.\n5 Where hole in solid rock is not substantially vertical.\n6 Where diameter of hole at surface of rock exceeds twice the diameter of pole at same level. At\n7 corners, dead ends, and other points of extra strain, poles 40 feet or more long shall be set 6 inches\n8 deeper.\n9 Backfill: Thoroughly tamp pole backfill for full depth of hole and mound excess fill around pole.\n10 Setting Poles: Set poles so that alternate crossarm gains face in opposite directions, except at terminals\n11 and dead ends where gains of last two poles shall be on side facing terminal or dead end. On unusually\n12 long spans, set poles so that crossarm comes on side of pole away from long span. Where pole top pins\n13 are used, they shall be on opposite side of pole from gain, with flat side against pole.\n14 Alignment of Poles: Set poles in alignment and plumb except at corners, terminals, angles, junctions, or\n15 other points of strain, where they shall be set and raked against strain. Set not less than 2 inches for each\n16 10 feet of pole length above grade, nor more than 4 inches for each 10 feet of pole length after conductors\n17 are installed at required tension. When average ground run is level, consecutive poles shall not vary more\n18 than 5 feet in height. When ground is uneven, poles differing in length shall be kept to a minimum by\n19 locating poles to avoid highest and lowest ground points. If it becomes necessary to shorten pole, a piece\n20 shall be sawed off top and shall be treated and capped. Holes shall be dug large enough to permit proper\n21 use of tampers to full depth of hole.\n22 Pole Cap: Provide plastic pole caps with 1/4-inch sealing rings and 4 nailing tabs. Fill sealing area with\n23 either a bituminous, elastigum roof cement, or an acceptable preservative paste to level of sealing ring to\n24 eliminate possibility of condensation. Place on pole top and nail each tab down with 1-1/4-inch nail.\n25 Pole caps are not necessary for ACA/CCA treated poles, unless they are shortened.\n26 Cutting of Wood Poles: Where new gains or holes are required, paint gains with preservative compound\n27 as recommended by the pole manufacturer. Plug unused or abandoned holes using treated wood dowel\n28 pins.\n29 Do not cut the tops of wood poles, except under very exceptional conditions, and only upon approval of\n30 Construction Manager. If cutting is deemed necessary, pole top shall be capped. Do not cut butt of wood\n31 poles.\nAppendix 4D.364\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Anchor and Guy: Place anchor in line with strain. Length of guy lead (distance from base of pole to top\n2 of anchor rod) shall be as indicated.\n3 Setting Anchor: Set anchor in-place with anchor rod aligned with, and pointing directly at, guy\n4 attachment on pole with anchor rod projecting 6 to 9 inches out of ground to prevent burial of rod eye.\n5 Setting Guy Strand:\n6 Complete anchor and guy installation, dead end to dead end, and tighten guy before wire stringing\n7 and sagging is begun on that line section.\n8 Provide strain insulator at a point on guy strand 8 feet, minimum, from ground and 6 feet, minimum,\n9 from surface of pole.\n10 Hardware: Provide hardware with washer against wood and with nut and lock nut applied wrench tight.\n11 Provide locknut on threaded hardware connection. Locknut shall be M-F style and not palnut style.\n12 Grounding: Conform to ANSI C2. Ground fused switches and lightning arrestors. Bond together pole\n13 line hardware separated by less than 2 inches.\n14 Ground Rod Connection:\n15 On pole lines by exothermic weld or by using compression connector for ground wire or wire to rod\n16 connection.\n17 Exothermic welds strictly in accordance with manufacturer's written recommendations.\n18 Welds which have puffed up or which show convex surfaces indicating improper cleaning, are not\n19 acceptable.\n20 No mechanical connectors are required at exothermic weldments.\n21 Compression connector shall be type that uses hydraulic compression tool to provide correct pressure.\n22 Provide tools and dies recommended by compression connector manufacturer.\n23 Embossing die code or similar method shall provide visible indication that connector has been fully\n24 compressed on ground wire.\n25 Grounding and Grounded Connections:\n26 Where no primary or common neutral exists, surge arrestors and frames of equipment operating at\n27 over 750 volts shall be bonded together and connected to a dedicated grounding electrode.\n28 Where no primary or common neutral exists, transformer secondary neutral bushing, secondary\n29 neutral conductor, and frames of equipment operating at under 750 volts shall be bonded together and\n30 connected to a dedicated grounding electrode.\n31 When a primary or common neutral exists, connect all grounding and grounded conductors to\n32 common grounding electrode.\n33 Protective Molding: Protect grounding conductors that are run on surface of wood poles by wood\n34 molding or plastic molding of equal mechanical strength extending from ground line throughout\n35 communication and transformer spaces.\n36 Conductors: Prevent nicking, kinking, gouging, flattening, or otherwise deforming or weakening\n37 conductor or impairing its conductivity. Remove damaged sections of conductor and splice conductor.\n38 Splices: Conductor splices, as installed, shall exceed ultimate rated strength of conductor and shall be of\n39 type recommended by conductor manufacturer. No splice shall be permitted within 10 feet of a support.\n40 Ties: Provide ties on pin insulators tight against conductor and insulator and ends turned down flat\n41 against conductor so that no wire ends project.\n42 Reinstalling: Existing conductors to be reinstalled or resagged shall be strung to \"final\" sag table values\n43 indicated for particular conductor type and size involved.\nAppendix 4D.365\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI New Installation: String new conductors to \"initial\" sag table values indicated for conductor type and\n2 size of conductor and ruling span indicated.\n3 Aluminum Protection: Protect ACSR conductors by armor rod at pin insulators and by flat aluminum\n4 wire at attachments made of galvanized or coated iron or steel.\n5 Fittings: Dead end fittings, clamp or compression type, shall conform to written recommendations of\n6 conductor manufacturer and shall develop full ultimate strength of conductor.\n7 Aluminum Connections: To copper or other material using only splices, connectors, lugs, or fittings\n8 designed for that specific purpose.\n9 Riser: Secure conduit on pole by two hole galvanized steel pipe straps spaced no more than 10 feet apart\n10 and within 3 feet of any outlet or termination. Ground metallic conduit.\n11 Construction Quality Control\n12 Wood Crossarm Inspection: Furnish inspection report from independent inspection agency, approved\n13 by the Tank Farm Contractor, stating that offered products comply with applicable AWPA and RUS\n14 standards. The RUS approved Quality Mark \"WQC\" on each crossarm will be accepted, in lieu of\n15 inspection reports, as evidence of compliance with applicable AWPA treatment standards.\n16 Acceptance Checks and Tests:\n17 Notify Fluor Hanford Electrical Utility (FHEU) 5 working days prior to start of checking and testing.\n18 FHEU will test 15 kV cables and transformers.\n19 Perform in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations and include the following visual and\n20 mechanical inspections, and electrical tests, performed in accordance with NETA ATS.\n21 Grounding System:\n22 Visual and Mechanical Inspection: Inspect ground system for compliance with Drawings and\n23 Specifications.\n24 Electrical Tests: Perform ground-impedance measurements utilizing fall-of-potential method. On\n25 systems consisting of interconnected ground rods, perform tests after interconnections are complete. On\n26 systems consisting of single ground rod, perform tests before any wire is connected. Take measurements\n27 in normally dry weather, not less than 48 hours after rainfall. Use a portable ground testing megger in\n28 accordance with manufacturer's instructions to test each ground or group of grounds. Instrument shall be\n29 equipped with a meter reading directly in ohms or fractions thereof to indicate ground value of ground rod\n30 or grounding systems under test.\n31 Report: Before energizing electrical equipment, submit the measured ground resistance of grounding\n32 system.\n33 Include the test method and test setup (i.e., pin location) used to determine ground resistance and soil\n34 conditions at time measurements were made.\n35 Devices Subject to Manual Operation: Operate at least three times, demonstrating satisfactory\n36 operation each time.\n37 Follow-Up Verification: Upon completion of acceptance checks and tests, show, by demonstration in\n38 service, that circuits and devices are in operating condition and properly performing intended function.\n39 END OF SECTION 16312\nAppendix 4D.366\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 SECTION 16440 -LOW VOLTAGE MOTOR CONTROL SCHED. B\n2 Part 1 -General\n3 UL Compliance\n4 Products manufactured within scope of Underwriters Laboratories shall conform to UL Standards and\n5 have an applied UL Listing Mark.\n6 Approval By Authority Having Jurisdiction (AHJ)\n7 As specified in Section 16005, ELECTRICAL.\n8 Electrical Description of Work\n9 Provide the following 480-volt, three-phase, four-wire with ground, 600-amp service rated motor control\n10 centers in accordance with this Specification and Contract Drawings:\n11 219A-LH-MCC-001 to be installed inside the Cell No. 1 Crest Pad Building 219A.\n12 219E-LH-MCC-001 to be installed inside the Cell No. 2 Crest Pad Building 219E.\n13 MCC(s) shall be provided with the following minimum features in accordance with this Specification\n14 and Contract Drawings:\n15 Main Incoming Service Breaker, with service neutral terminal connection in main breaker section\n16 only.\n17 Portable Generator Power Outlet Feeder Breaker and Kirk Key (ed) arrangement with main incoming\n18 service breaker.\n19 Phase Loss and Reversal Protection Relay and Alarm Lighting.\n20 Transient Voltage Surge Suppressor (TVSS).\n21 Volt and Current Meters and Selector Switches.\n22 Lighting Panel.\n23 Lighting Panel Transformer.\n24 NEMA 1 Size Motor Starters (incorporating: breaker, control power transformer, fuses, contactor,\n25 overloads, indicators, control switches, elapsed time meter, terminal strips, wiring, and locking\n26 mechanism).\n27 NEMA Feeder Breakers.\n28 Three Sections.\n29 Time Delay and Magnetic Control Relays.\n30 Interlocking control relays, terminals, and lining assembled together in unit compartment.\n31 Submittals-Approval Required\n32 See Section 01300, SUBMITTALS, for submittal procedures.\n33 Product Data:\n34 Itemized bill-of-material.\n35 Descriptive information.\n36 Dimensional drawings.\n37 Conduit entrance locations.\n38 Bus data.\nAppendix 4D.367\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Protective Devices:\n2 Copies of time-current characteristics.\n3 Operational description.\n4 Anchoring instructions and details.\n5 Typed Tabulation:\n6 Motor name; tag (equipment) numbers as shown on Drawings.\n7 Motor horsepower.\n8 Nameplate full load current.\n9 Measured load current and voltage.\n10 Heater catalog number.\n11 Protective device trip settings.\n12 Attach above typed, tabulated data to a copy of starter manufacturer's overload selection tables for\n13 the starters provided.\n14 Control Diagrams:\n15 NEMA ICS 2, Section 322.08 Type I.\n16 Wiring Type B.\n17 In addition to standard NEMA control diagrams, provide the following:\n18 Remote control devices.\n19 Remote indication and/or pilot lights.\n20 Interconnections and interlocking circuits between starter and remote equipment.\n21 Remote sensors.\n22 Tag numbers associated with all control devices and equipment.\n23 One-line diagrams.\n24 Schematic (elementary) diagrams.\n25 Outline diagrams.\n26 Submittals-Approval Not Required\n27 Information/Record (IR):\n28 Manufacturer's installation instructions.\n29 Operation and maintenance data, including recommended preventative maintenance tasks and\n30 frequencies for performance of those tasks.\n31 Submit documentation and test results for construction quality control testing.\n32 Packing And Shipping:\n33 Shipping Splits: Established by Construction Subcontractor to facilitate ingress of equipment to final\n34 installation location within the building.\n35 Part 2 -Products (Reference Section 16005, Electrical)\n36 Manufacturers\n37 Square D.\n38 Cutler-Hammer.\n39 General Electric.\n40 Allen-Bradley.\nAppendix 4D.368\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Motor Control\n2 General:\n3 Like Items of Equipment: End product and responsibility of one manufacturer.\n4 Make adjustments as necessary to wiring, conduit, disconnect devices, motor starters, branch circuit\n5 protection, and other affected material or equipment to accommodate motors actually provided under this\n6 Contract.\n7 Controllers: NEMA ICS 2, Class B.\n8 Electronic Overload Protection:\n9 Programmable solid-state electronic overload relay with integral CT(s) for monitoring three-phase current\n10 and voltage, thereby providing motor overload, phase reversal and phase loss protection. In the event of\n11 an alarm condition, electronic overload relay will de-energize fail safe alarm contact to motor control\n12 circuit.\n13 Ratings:\n14 Voltage Range (LI, L2-L3): 480 volts 50/60 Hz.\n15 Current Range: Specific range compatible with motor FLA operation.\n16 Power Consumption: 10 watts.\n17 Trip Circuit: Form C SPDT (N.0 and N.C) contacts, 5 amps 120 volts.\n18 Measurements: Voltage, current, and timing.\n19 Relay Trip: Standard Class 20.\n20 Manual Reset.\n21 Mount within starter unit.\n22 Manufacturer:\n23 Square D.\n24 Allen-Bradley.\n25 General Electric.\n26 Cutler-Hammer.\n27 Control Transformer:\n28 Two winding, 120-volt secondary, primary voltage to suit.\n29 Two current-limiting fuses for primary circuit.\n30 One fuse in secondary circuit.\n31 Mount within starter unit.\n32 Suitable for use with 75 degrees C copper wire at full NFPA 70, 75 degrees C ampacity.\n33 Lifting lugs on all equipment and devices weighing over 100 pounds.\n34 Operating Conditions:\n35 Ambient Temperature: Maximum 40 degrees C.\n36 Equipment to be fully rated without any derating for operating conditions listed in Section 16005,\n37 ELECTRICAL.\n38 Enclosures: In accordance with NEMA 250 and ANSI C57.12.28.\nAppendix 4D.369\n WA7890008967Integrated Disposal Facility\nI Equipment Finish:\n2 Electrocoating process applied over a rust-inhibiting phosphated base coating.\n3 Exterior Color: Manufacturer's standard.\n4 Manually Operated Starter, Fractional Horsepower:\n5 Rating: 16 amperes continuous at 277 volts maximum, or horsepower rated for the voltage and\n6 horsepower of the load served.\n7 Single-phase, nonreversing, full voltage with overload protection.\n8 Toggle operated.\n9 Enclosure: Reference Section 16005, ELECTRICAL, Article ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS.\n10 Pilot LED Light: Red.\n11 Handle guard/lock-off attachment.\n12 Combination Full-Voltage, Magnetic Starter:\n13 Rating: Hp rated at 600 volts, UL labeled for 42,000 amperes fault current withstand capacity with\n14 overload protection.\n15 Three-phase, nonreversing, full voltage.\n16 Control: HAND/OFF/AUTO selector switch.\n17 Disconnect Type: Motor circuit protector.\n18 Enclosure: Reference Section 16005, ELECTRICAL, Article ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS.\n19 Pilot LED Lights: Red-ON and Green-OFF.\n20 Padlockable operating handle.\n21 Kirk Key Interlocks\n22 Provide Kirk Key interlocks for one main and one portable generator plug breaker arrangement in each\n23 MCC.\n24 Provide engraved plate on MCC which describes Kirk Key breaker arrangement and operation as\n25 described herein.\n26 Operation:\n27 One unique key available for MCC main and portable generator breaker locks (i.e., Kirk keys for\n28 additional MCC(s) shall not be identical).\n29 One of the two breakers CLOSED at any one time.\n30 Breaker must be opened before key can be removed and inserted.\n31 Key must be inserted and operated before breaker can be CLOSED.\n32 Motor Control Centers\n33 General:\n34 Motor Control Center to be manufactured and provided as a complete UL-approved assembly that\n35 includes the following major components specified under this section and Section 16005, ELECTRICAL:\n36 Motor starters with electronic overload protection relays.\n37 Feeder and main breakers.\n38 Power monitoring.\nAppendix 4D.370\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Lighting and power distribution panelboard.\n2 Lighting and power distribution stepdown transformer.\n3 Transient Voltage Surge Suppressor (TVSS).\n4 Interlocking control relays.\n5 In accordance with NEMA ICS 2, UL 845, and UL 508/508A.\n6 Voltage Rating: 600 volts.\n7 Short Circuit Rating: 42,000 minimum amperes rms symmetrical for entire motor control center as a\n8 complete assembly.\n9 All controllers, main and branch circuit breakers, wire connections, and other devices to be front mounted\n10 and accessible unless otherwise noted.\n11 NEMA ICS 2, Section 322.08.\n12 Class: I.\n13 Type: B.\n14 Wire remote control and signal circuits to separate terminal board in each motor starter compartment.\n15 Enclosure:\n16 Type: NEMA 250 Type 12 unless otherwise rated.\n17 Vertical Section Dimensions: 90 inches high, 20 inches wide, 20 inches deep.\n18 Construction:\n19 Sheet steel reinforced with channel or angle irons.\n20 Butt sections flush, end-to-end against similar section without bolts, nuts, or cover plates causing\n21 interference.\n22 Removable top cover plates and bottom cover plates.\n23 Section Mounting: Removable formed-steel channel sills and lifting angles to meet specified seismic\n24 requirements.\n25 Horizontal Wiring Compartments: Accessible from front, full width, top and bottom.\n26 Vertical Wiring Compartment: Full height, isolated from unit starters with separate door.\n27 Unit Compartment: Individual compartments separated by steel barriers for each starter, feeder, or\n28 other unit capable of being wired from front without unit removal.\n29 Compartment Doors: Separate hinged doors for each starter, feeder, or other unit.\n30 Door Interlocking: Interlock starter and feeder doors mechanically so doors cannot be opened with unit\n31 energized. Provide defeater mechanism to allow intentional access at any time.\n32 External disconnect handles, padlockable in OFF position.\n33 Cable Entrance: Incoming service enters from bottom; control and feeder circuits enter from top and\n34 bottom.\n35 Bus:\n36 Horizontal Power Bus:\n37 Three-phase tin-plated, fully insulated, copper, entire width of control center, rated 600 amperes.\n38 Construct to allow future extension of additional sections.\n39 Pressure type solderless lugs for each incoming line cable.\nAppendix 4D.371\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Isolated from top horizontal wireway.\n2 Provide Belleville washers on bus connection bolts.\n3 Vertical Power Bus:\n4 Three-phase tin-plated, fully insulated, copper, full height of section, rated 300 amperes.\n5 Sandwich type bus insulation providing deadfront construction with starter units removed except for\n6 bus stab openings.\n7 Insulated and isolated barrier complete with shutters.\n8 Provide Belleville washers on bus connection bolts.\n9 Neutral Bus: 50 percent neutral, copper-tin-plated main breaker section only.\n10 Ground Bus:\n11 Copper, tin-plated, 33 percent minimum of phase bus ampacity, entire width of control center.\n12 Provide Belleville washers on bus connection bolts.\n13 Bus Bracing: 42,000 minimum amperes rms symmetrical.\n14 Motor Controller Unit:\n15 Provide indicated individual components and control devices including pushbuttons, selector\n16 switches, indicating lights, control relays, time delay relays, and elapsed time meters as specified in\n17 this section.\n18 Construction:\n19 Drawout combination type with stab connections for starters NEMA ICS, Size 4 and smaller.\n20 Readily interchangeable with starters of similar size.\n21 Pull-apart unit control wiring terminal boards on all units.\n22 Starters: NEMA ICS 2, Section 322.08 standard rating, except none smaller than NEMA ICS, Size 1.\n23 Rating: Hp rated at 600 volts, UL labeled for 42,000 amperes fault current withstand capacity with\n24 overload protection.\n25 Three-phase, nonreversing.\n26 Disconnect Type: Thermal magnetic as shown. Motor circuit protector may be substituted, properly\n27 sized and adjusted.\n28 Combination Full Voltage, Magnetic Starter:\n29 Control: ON/OFF/AUTO selector switch. As shown.\n30 Pilot LED Lights: Red-ON; Green-OFF.\n31 Padlockable operating handle when de-energized.\n32 Unit door interlocked to prevent opening when disconnect is in closed position.\n33 Mechanical interlocked to prevent placing disconnect in ON position when unit door is open.\n34 Minimum Dimensions: 12 inches high by full section width, less vertical wireway.\n35 Disconnecting Device: In each starter, control circuit disconnect to de-energize circuits in unit which are\n36 not de-energized by starter power disconnect device.\n37 Padlockable in OPEN position.\nAppendix 4D.372\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Circuit Breaker:\n2 Meeting the requirements of NEMA AB I and UL 489.\n3 Molded case with manufacturer's recommended trip setting for maximum motor protection.\n4 Thermal-magnetic trip or magnetic trip only as shown.\n5 Tripping indicated by operating-handle position.\n6 Interrupting capacity required for connection to system with short circuit capacity indicated.\n7 Motor Overload, Phase Reversal and Loss Protection:\n8 Programmable solid-state electronic overload relay with internal CTs for monitoring three-phase current\n9 and voltage, thereby providing motor overload, phase reversal, and phase loss protection.\n10 Make overload adjustments based upon motor FLA.\n11 Make voltage adjustments based upon incoming voltage nominal readings.\n12 Control Unit:\n13 Disconnecting Device: Capable of de-energizing external source control circuits in unit.\n14 Control Devices: As indicated and as specified in Section 16005, ELECTRICAL.\n15 Control Wiring:\n16 Minimum wire size No. 14 AWG copper.\n17 Permanent sleeve type markers with wire numbers applied to each end of wires.\n18 Terminate current transformer leads on shorting type terminal blocks.\n19 Feeder Unit and Main Protective Device:\n20 Construction: As specified in paragraph Motor Controller Unit.\n21 Incoming Service Feeder: Cable entering section at bottom.\n22 Molded Case Circuit Breaker:\n23 In accordance with NEMA ABI and UL 489.\n24 Main, feeder, and motor protective device.\n25 UL labeled as suitable for service entrance.\n26 Thermal-magnetic trip and interrupting capacity required for connection to system with short circuit\n27 capacity indicated.\n28 Indicate tripping by operating-handle position.\n29 Suitable for use with 75 degrees C copper wire at full NEC 75 degrees C ampacity.\n30 Reset Timer:\n31 Timing Method: Solid state with LCD display.\n32 Mounting: Semi-flush, panel.\n33 Contacts: 5-amp, 120-volt.\n34 Manufacturers and Products:\n35 Square D.\n36 Cutler-Hammer.\n37 General Electric.\nAppendix 4D.373\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Magnetic Contactor:\n2 UL listed.\n3 Electrically operated, electrically held.\n4 Main Contacts:\n5 NEMA B600 contacts.\n6 Electrically held.\n7 Silver alloy with wiping action and arc quenchers.\n8 NEMA Size 0 or 1 as required for the motor controller.\n9 Three-pole.\n10 Control: Two-wire.\n11 One normally open and one normally closed auxiliary contact rated 10 amperes at 480 volts.\n12 Manufacturers and Products:\n13 Allen-Bradley.\n14 Square D Co.; Type F.\n15 Cutler-Hammer.\n16 Pushbutton, Indicating Light and Selector Switches:\n17 Contact Rating: NEMA ICS 2, Type A600.\n18 Selector Switch Operating Lever: Standard.\n19 Indicating Lights: Push-to-test, LED, full voltage.\n20 Pushbutton Color:\n21 ON or START: Black.\n22 OFF or STOP: Red.\n23 Pushbuttons and selector switches lockable in OFF position where indicated.\n24 Legend Plate:\n25 Material: Aluminum.\n26 Engraving: 11 characters/spaces on one line, 14 characters/spaces on each of two lines, as required,\n27 indicating specific function.\n28 Letter Height: 7/64 inch.\n29 Manufacturers:\n30 Square D Co.\n31 Cutler-Hammer.\n32 General Electric.\n33 Allen-Bradley.\n34 Nameplates:\n35 Provide nameplates per Hanford standards.\n36 Laminated plastic; white, engraved to black core.\n37 Provide for each motor control center and each unit.\n38 Engrave with inscription shown on single-line diagram.\n39 Provide blank nameplates on spaces for future units.\n40 Attach with stainless steel panhead screws on face of control center.\nAppendix 4D.374\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Factory Testing: NEMA ICS 1, Section 109, or UL 486A if not specified by the manufacturer.\n2 Part 3 -Execution\n3 Installation\n4 Install equipment in accordance with NEMA ICS 2.3, Submittal Drawings, and Manufacturer's\n5 Instructions and Recommendations.\n6 Secure equipment to mounting pads with anchor bolts of sufficient size and number adequate for\n7 specified seismic conditions. Reference Section 13122, METAL BUILDING SYSTEMS, Part 2, Article\n8 DESIGN LOADS, for information on seismic loading. Install suitable braces from MCC to building\n9 structural members for seismic support.\n10 Install equipment plumb and in longitudinal alignment with pad or wall.\n11 Coordinate terminal connections with installation of secondary feeders.\n12 Grout mounting channels into floor or mounting pads.\n13 Retighten current-carrying bolted connections and enclosure support framing and panels to manufacturer's\n14 recommendations.\n15 Circuit Breakers (Magnetic-Trip-Only)\n16 Field adjust trip settings of motor starter magnetic-trip-only circuit breakers.\n17 Adjust to approximately 11 times motor rated current in accordance with NEC 430-52.\n18 Determine motor rated current from motor nameplate following installation.\n19 Overload Relay\n20 Select and install overload relay settings after the actual nameplate full-load current rating of motor has\n21 been determined.\n22 Motor Data\n23 Provide typed, self-adhesive label attached outside each motor starter enclosure door displaying the\n24 following information with plastic black and white lettering, minimum 1/2-inch size:\n25 Motor served by tag number and equipment name.\n26 Nameplate horsepower.\n27 Motor code letter.\n28 Full load amperes.\n29 Service factor.\n30 Installed overload relay heater catalog number.\n31 Construction Quality Control\n32 In accordance with Section 16080, ELECTRICAL TESTING.\n33 Manufacturer's Services\n34 Furnish manufacturer's representative in accordance with Section 01640, MANUFACTURERS'\n35 SERVICES, for the following services at jobsite for minimum person-days listed below, travel time\n36 excluded:\n37 Person-day for installation assistance, and inspection of installation.\n38 Person-day for functional and performance testing.\n39. END OF SECTION 16440\nAppendix 4D.375\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nCHAPTER 5.0\nGROUNDWATER MONITORING\nChapter 5.i\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nChapter 5.ii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2 CHAPTER 5.0\n3 GROUNDWATER MONITORING\n4\n5 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n6 5.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING.......................................5.5\n7 5.1 Exemption from Groundwater Protection Requirement...........................5.5\n8 5.2 Interim Status Period Groundwater Monitoring Data................ ............ 5.5\n9 5.3 Aquifer Identification................................................5.5\n10 5.3.1 Geology of the IDF Site ................................................... 5.5\n11 5.3.1.1 Structural Framework......................................................5.6\n12 5.3.1.2 Stratigraphy.......................................................5.6\n13 5.3.2 Groundwater Hydrology...............................................5.8\n14 5.4 Contaminant Plume Description..........................................5.9\n15 5.4.1 Groundwater Contamination............................................5.9\n16 5.4.2 Vadose Zone Contamination............................................5.9\n17 5.5 Detection Monitoring Program...........................................5.10\n18 5.5.1 Indicator Parameters, Waste Constituents, Reaction Products to be Monitored .................. 5.510\n19 5.5.1.1 Regulated Constituents................................................5.10\n20 5.5.1.2 Monitoring Parameters................................................5.10\n21 5.5.1.3 Dangerous Waste Characterization.......................................5.11\n22 5.5.1.4 Behavior of Constituents...............................................5.11\n23 5.5.15 Detectability.......................................................5.12\n24 5.5.2 Groundwater Monitoring Program.......................................5.12\n25 5.5.2.1 Description of Wells.................................................5.12\n26 5.5.2.2 Equipment Decontamination............................................5.13\n27 5.5.2.3 Representative Samples...............................................5.13\n28 5.5.2.4 Locations of Background Groundwater Monitoring Wells that are not Upgradient................ 5.13\n29 5.5.3 Background Values Waste.Constituen..................................................5.14\n30 5.5.3.1 Plan for Establishing Groundwater Quality Data ......................... ..... 5.14\n31 5.5.4 Sampling, Analysis and Statistical Procedures ................................... 5.14\n32 5.5.4.1 Sample Collection .................................................. 5.14\n33 5.5.4.2 Sample Preservation and Shipment .................................. ..... 5.15\n34 5.5.4.3 Analytical Procedures ................................................ 5.15\n35 5.5.4.4 Chain of Custody................................................... 5.17\n36 5.5.4.5 Additional Requirements for Compliance Point Monitoring ................. ..... 5.17\nChapter 5.iii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 5.5.4.6 Annual Determination .......................................... ..... 5.18\n2 5.5.4.7 Statistical Determination ............................................. 5.18\n3 5.5.5 Compliance Monitoring Program ............................................. 5.21\n4 5.5.6 Corrective Action Program ...................................... ...... 5.22\n5 5.6 REFERENCES .................................................... 5.35\n6\n7 FIGURES\n8 Figure 5.1. Location of the IDF and Nearby Boreholes.......................................................................... 5.23\n9 Figure 5.2. Geologic Map of the 200 East and 200 West Areas and Vicinity ........................................ 5.24\n10 Figure 5.3. Stratigraphy of the H anford Site........................................................................................... 5.25\n11 Figure 5.4. Cross-Section through the ID F Site...................................................................................... 5.26\n12 Figure 5.5. W ater Table Map for the Hanford Site 200 East Area ......................................................... 5.27\n13 Figure 5.6. Hydrographs for W ells Near the IDF Site............................................................................ 5.28\n14 Figure 5.7. Concentration versus Time for Nitrate in Wells 299-E24-7 and 299-E24-18...................... 5.29\n15 Figure 5.8. Sequence for Installation of Downgradient Monitoring Wells at the IDF............................ 5.30\n16\n17 TABLES\n18 Table 5.1. Water Levels in Groundwater Wells in the Vicinity of the IDF Site .................. 5.31\n19 Table 5.2. Monitored Constituents for the IDF .......................................... 5.31\n20 Table 5.3. Expected Behavior of Selected Regulated Constituents/Materials for the IDF .... ..... 5.32\n21 Table 5.4. Analytical Methods and Method Detection Limits for Regulated Constituents and\n22 Indicator Parameters .......................................... ..... 5.34\n23\n24\nChapter 5.iv\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 5.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING\n2 The Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF) will be an Resource Conservation and Recovery Act\n3 (RCRA)-compliant landfill (i.e., a double lined trench with leachate collection system). This chapter\n4 describes the groundwater monitoring plan for the IDF and addresses the requirements of RCRA, as\n5 described in 40 CFR 264, Subpart F, by reference of WAC 173-303-645(3). Figure 5.1 shows the\n6 location of the IDF and surrounding groundwater wells in the 200 East Area. This chapter is designed to\n7 meet final status detection-level groundwater monitoring requirements for the IDF. This groundwater\n8 monitoring plan is based on the application of a modified data quality objectives (EPA QA/G-4) process\n9 to a conceptual model, and the most recent evaluations of groundwater hydrology and chemistry at the\n10 site.\n11 This plan describes the characteristics of the waste to be disposed in the IDF and the site geology and\n12 hydrology used to design and operate the monitoring well network and to interpret the groundwater data.\n13 The historic groundwater chemistry from wells near the IDF site is provided. Much of the information\n14 pertaining to waste characterization is taken from HNF-4921 and that pertaining to hydrogeology from\n15 PNNL-1 1957, PNNL-12257, PNNL-13652, and PNNL-14029.\n16 The plan includes a description of network well locations, well construction, sample constituents, and\n17 sampling frequency for detection-level groundwater monitoring. Procedures for determination of\n18 compliance point groundwater quality also are included. Finally, this plan provides the basis for rapid\n19 development of a compliance monitoring plan if a validated exceedance of an indicator parameter is\n20 found. This plan controls initial baseline monitoring and subsequent detection level monitoring only for\n21 the IDF.\n22 Source, special nuclear, and byproduct materials as defined by the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as\n23 amended, are regulated at the United States Department of Energy (DOE) facilities exclusively by DOE\n24 acting pursuant to its AEA authority. These materials are not subject to regulation by the State of\n25 Washington. All information contained herein and related to, or describing AEA-regulated materials and\n26 processes in any manner may not be used to create conditions or other restrictions set forth in any permit,\n27 license, order, or any other enforceable instrument. DOE asserts that pursuant to the AEA, it has sole and\n28 exclusive responsibility and authority to regulate source, special nuclear and by-product materials at\n29 DOE-owned nuclear facilities. Information contained herein on radionuclides is provided for process\n30 description purposes only.\n31 5.1 Exemption from Groundwater Protection Requirement\n32 An exemption is not requested.\n33 5.2 Interim Status Period Groundwater Monitoring Data\n34 The IDF will be a new facility constructed in the 200 East Area. Interim status groundwater monitoring is\n35 not applicable.\n36 5.3 Aquifer Identification\n37 The following sections discuss geology and hydrology.\n38 5.3.1 Geology of the IDF Site\n39 The 200 East Area lies on the Cold Creek bar, a geomorphic remnant of the cataclysmic, glacial related\n40 floods of the Pleistocene Epoch. As the floodwaters raced across the lowlands of the Pasco Basin and\n41 Hanford Site, floodwaters lost energy and began to deposit sand and gravel. The 200 Area Plateau is one\n42 of the most prominent deposits. The 200 Area Plateau lies just southwest of one of the major flood\n43 channels across the Hanford Site that forms the topographic lowland south of Gable Mountain.\n44 Borehole data provide the principal source of geologic, hydrologic, and groundwater information for the\n45 200 East Area and the IDF site.\n46\nChapter 5.5\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Numerous boreholes (both vadose zone boreholes and groundwater monitoring wells) have been drilled in\n2 the 200 East Area for groundwater monitoring and waste management studies (Figure 5.1 shows the\n3 location of groundwater wells near the IDF site.) However, data are limited within the IDF site primarily\n4 because no previous construction or waste disposal activities have occurred in this part of the Hanford\n5 Facility. Most boreholes in the 200 East Area have been drilled using the cable tool method and either a\n6 hard tool or drive barrel to advance the hole. Some boreholes have been drilled by rotary and wire line\n7 coring methods. More recently, boreholes in the area have been drilled, and in five cases cored, by\n8 percussion hammer methods. Geologic logs are based on examination of drill core, chips, and cuttings\n9 from these boreholes. Chip samples typically are taken at 1.5-meter intervals and routinely archived at\n10 the Hanford Geotechnical Sample Library.\n11 5.3.1.1 Structural Framework\n12 The IDF site will be located south of the Gable Mountain segment of the Umtanum Ridge anticline and\n13 about 3 kilometers north of the axis of the Cold Creek syncline, which controls the structural grain of the\n14 basalt bedrock and the Ringold Formation. The basalt surface and Ringold Formation trend roughly\n15 southeast-northwest parallel to the major geologic structures of the site. As a result, the Ringold\n16 Formation and the underlying Columbia River Basalt Group gently dip to the south off the Umtanum\n17 Ridge anticline into the Cold Creek syncline.\n18 Geologic mapping on the Hanford Site and examination of drill core and borehole cuttings in the area\n19 have not identified any faults in the vicinity of the IDF site (DOE/RW-0164). The closest known faults\n20 are along the Umtanum Ridge-Gable Mountain structure north of the disposal site and the May Junction\n21 fault east of the site (Figure 5.2).\n22 5.3.1.2 Stratigraphy\n23 The basalt and post-basalt stratigraphy for the IDF site is shown in Figure 5.3. Approximately 137 to 167\n24 meters of suprabasalt sediments overlie the basalt bedrock at the site.\n25 Basalt Bedrock. Previous studies (RHO-BWI-ST-14; Reidel and Fecht 1994) have shown that the\n26 youngest lava flows of the Columbia River Basalt Group at the 200 East Area are those of the\n27 10.5 million year old Elephant Mountain Member. This member underlies the entire 200 East Area and\n28 surrounding area and forms the base of the suprabasalts aquifer. No erosional windows in the basalt are\n29 known or suspected to occur in the area of the IDF site.\n30 Ringold Formation. Few boreholes penetrate the entire Ringold Formation at the IDF site so available\n31 data are limited. The Ringold Formation reaches a maximum thickness of 95 meters on the west side of\n32 the site and thins eastward. The member of Wooded Island (Figure 5.3) is the only member of the\n33 Ringold Formation in the 200 East Area. The deepest Ringold Formation unit encountered is the lower\n34 gravel, unit A. Lying above unit A is the lower mud unit and overlying the lower mud unit is upper\n35 gravel, unit E. The sand and silt units of the members of Taylor Flat and Savage Island of the Ringold\n36 Formation are not present at the IDF site. Unit A and unit E are equivalent to the Pliocene-Miocene\n37 continental conglomerates (Reidel and Fecht 1994). The lower mud unit is equivalent to the\n38 Pliocene-Miocene continental sand, silt, and clay beds (Reidel and Fecht 1994).\n39 Only three boreholes have penetrated unit A in the area of the IDF site. Unit A is 19 meters thick on the\n40 west side of the site and thins to the northeast. Unit A is partly to well cemented conglomerate consisting\n41 of both felsic and basaltic clasts in a sandy matrix and is interpreted as a fluvial gravel facies\n42 (Lindsey 1996). There are minor beds of yellow to white interbedded sand and silt. Green colored,\n43 reduced-iron stain is present on some grains and pebbles. Although the entire unit appears to be\n44 cemented, the zone produced abundant high quality water in borehole 299-E17-21 (PNNL-1 1957).\n45 Nineteen meters of the lower mud unit were encountered in one borehole at the IDF site (PNNL-1 1957).\n46 The upper most 1-meter or so consists of a yellow mud to sandy mud. The yellow mud grades downward\n47 into about 10 meters of blue mud.\n48\nChapter 5.6\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The blue mud, in turn, grades down into 7 meters of brown mud with organic rich zones and occasional\n2 wood fragments. The lower mud unit is absent in the center of the site (northeast of borehole 299-E24-7\n3 on Figure 5.4).\n4 Unit E is described as a sandy gravel to gravelly sand. Unit E is interpreted to consist of as much as\n5 15 meters of conglomerate with scattered large pebbles and cobbles up to 25 centimeters in size in a\n6 sandy matrix. The gravel consists of both felsic and basaltic rocks that are well rounded with a sand\n7 matrix supporting the cobbles and pebbles. Cementation of this unit ranges from slight to moderate.\n8 The upper contact of unit E is not identified easily at the IDF site. In the western part of the study area,\n9 unconsolidated gravels of the Hanford formation directly overly the Ringold Formation unit E gravels,\n10 making exact placement of the contact difficult. The dominance of basalt and the absence of cementation\n11 in the Hanford formation are the key criteria used to distinguishing these (PNNL-1 1957). In the central\n12 and northeast part of the area, unit E has been eroded completely. Unconsolidated gravels and sands\n13 typical of the Hanford formation replace unit E.\n14 Unconformity at the Top of the Ringold Formation. The surface of the Ringold Formation is irregular\n15 in the area of the IDF site. A northwest-southeast trending erosional channel or trough (the Columbia\n16 River/Missoula flood channel) is centered through the northeast portion of the site. The trough is deepest\n17 near borehole 299-E24-21 in the northern part of the site (PNNL-13652). This trough is interpreted as\n18 part of a larger trough under the 200 East Area resulting from scouring by the Missoula floods. Borehole\n19 299-E17-21, located at the southwest corner of the IDF site, is at the west side of the channel where\n20 approximately 46 meters of Ringold Formation have been removed and replaced by Hanford formation\n21 gravels. Boreholes 299-E17-25 and 299-E17-23, located along the southeastern edge of the Site, are near\n22 the deepest portion of the channel where it is interpreted that almost all of the Ringold Formation has\n23 been eroded. At this location, the water table in the channel is interpreted to be 52 meters above the\n24 basalt, which forms the floor of the channel. The surface of basalt rises to the north where the water table\n25 is approximately 27 meters above the basalt at the northeast corner of the site near borehole 299-E24-21.\n26 Hanford formation. The Hanford formation is as much as 116 meters thick in and around the IDF site.\n27 The Hanford formation thickens in the erosional channel cut into the Ringold Formation and thins to the\n28 southwest along the margin of the channel.\n29 At the IDF site, the Hanford formation consists mainly of sand dominated facies with lesser amounts of\n30 silt dominated and gravel dominated facies. The Hanford formation has been described as poorly sorted\n31 pebble to boulder gravel and fine- to coarse-grained sand, with lesser amounts of interstitial and\n32 interbedded silt and clay. In previous studies of the site (WHC-MR-0391), the Hanford formation was\n33 described as consisting of three units: an upper and lower gravel facies and a sand facies between the two\n34 gravelly units. The upper gravel dominated facies appears to be thin or absent in the immediate area of\n35 the IDF site (PNNL-12257, PNNL-13652, and PNNL-14029).\n36 The lowermost part of the Hanford formation encountered in boreholes at the IDF site consists of the\n37 gravel-dominated facies. Drill core and cuttings from boreholes 299-E17-21, 299-E17-22, 299-E17-23,\n38 299-E17-25, and 299-E24-21 indicate that the unit is a clast-supported pebble- to cobble gravel with\n39 minor amounts of sand in the matrix. The cobbles and pebbles almost are exclusively basalt with no\n40 cementation. This unit pinches out west of the IDF site and thickens to the east and northeast\n41 (Figure 5.4). The water table beneath the IDF site is located in the lower gravel unit. The lower gravel\n42 unit is interpreted to be Missoula flood gravels deposited in the erosional channel carved into the\n43 underlying Ringold Formation.\n44 The upper portion of the Hanford formation consists of at least 73 meters of fine- to coarse-grained sand\n45 with minor amounts of silt and clay and some gravelly sands.\n46 Holocene Deposits. Holocene, eolian deposits cover the southern part of the IDF site. Caliche coatings\n47 on the bottom of pebbles and cobbles in drill cores through this unit are typical of Holocene caliche\n48 development in the Columbia Basin.\nChapter 5.7\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI The southern part of the IDF site is capped by a stabilized sand dune. The eolian unit is composed of\n2 fine- to coarse-grained sands with abundant silt, as layers and as material mixed with the sand.\n3 Clastic Dikes. A clastic dike was encountered in borehole C3828, adjacent to well 299-E17-25, at the\n4 IDF site. Clastic dikes also have been observed in excavations surrounding the site [e.g., US Ecology, the\n5 former Grout area, the 216-BC cribs, the Central Landfill, and the Environmental Restoration Disposal\n6 Facility (BHI-01103)]. In undisturbed areas, such as the IDF site, clastic dikes typically are not observed\n7 because these are covered by windblown sediments. The occurrence of a clastic dike in borehole C3828\n8 suggests that these probably are present elsewhere in the subsurface at the disposal site. The IDF\n9 excavation will be geologically mapped to document the occurrence of any clastic dikes that may exist at\n10 the site.\n11 5.3.2 Groundwater Hydrology\n12 The unconfined aquifer under the IDF site occurs in the fluvial gravels of the Ringold Formation and\n13 flood deposits of the Hanford formation. The thickness of the aquifer ranges from about 70 meters at the\n14 southwest corner of the site to about 30 meters under the northeast corner of the IDF site. The Elephant\n15 Mountain Member of the Columbia River Basalt Group forms the base of the unconfined aquifer\n16 (Figure 5.4).\n17 The unsaturated zone beneath the land surface at the IDF site is approximately 100 meters thick and\n18 consists of the Hanford formation. The water level in boreholes in and around the site indicates that the\n19 water table is in the lower gravel sequence of the Hanford formation and at an elevation of approximately\n20 123 meters above sea level. The water table is nearly flat beneath the IDF site. Table 5.1 gives water\n21 level information from wells near the site. The locations of the wells are shown on Figure 5.1. The latest\n22 water table map shows less than about 0.1 meter of hydraulic head differential across the IDF site\n23 (Figure 5.5).\n24 The Ringold Formation lower mud unit occurs within the aquifer at the southwest corner of the IDF site\n25 (299-E17-21) but is absent in the central and northern parts of the site (299-E24-7 and 299-E24-21). The\n26 lower mud unit is known to be a confining or partly confining layer at places under the Hanford Site\n27 (PNNL-12261) and this might be the case under the southwest corner of the IDF site. Groundwater\n28 samples were collected and analyzed from above and below the lower mud unit during drilling of well\n29 299-E17-21. Chemical parameters (pH, electrical conductivity, and Eh) were different in the two samples\n30 suggesting that the lower mud is at least partly confining in the area. No contamination was found above\n31 or below the lower mud. An interpretation of the distribution and thickness of this stratum is shown in\n32 Figure 5.4. The surface of the lower mud unit is interpreted to dip gently to the southwest\n33 (PNNL-13652).\n34 Hydrographs for selected wells near the IDF site are shown in Figure 5.6. Although the water table is\n35 extremely flat in the area of the IDF, hydrographs suggest that groundwater flow has had an easterly\n36 component throughout the 1990s and has not significantly changed due to cessation of discharges to the\n37 216-B Pond system. Hydrographs for the older wells (299-E23-1, 299-E23-2, and 299-E24-7) show two\n38 maxima in the water level. These coincide with the operation of the PUREX Plant, which operated\n39 between 1956 and 1972 and between 1983 and 1988. All the hydrographs show a decline in the water\n40 table during recent years. The rate of decline is between 0.18 and 0.22 meter per year and will take\n41 between 10 and 30 years to stabilize. The reason for the decline is the cessation of effluent discharge to\n42 the 216-B Pond System, which is centered northeast of 200 East Area. Based on hindcast water table\n43 maps (BNWL-B-360), the water table is expected to decline another 2 to 7 meters before reaching\n44 pre-Hanford Site elevations. The cessations of effluent discharge also are responsible for changes in the\n45 direction of groundwater flow across much of the 200 East Area.\n46 Groundwater flow beneath the IDF site recently was modeled to be southeasterly (PNNL- 13400). This\n47 direction differs from the easterly direction predicted by the analysis of WHC-SD-WM-RPT-241 and\n48 other earlier reports.\n49\nChapter 5.8\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The southeasterly flow direction primarily is attributable to inclusion of the highly permeable Hanford\n2 formation sediments in the ancestral Columbia River/Missoula flood channel in the analysis.\n3 A southeasterly flow direction is reflected in the geographic distribution of the regional nitrate plume and\n4 in the distribution of other constituents under the south-central 200 East Area (PNNL-14187, 1 of 2,\n5 2 of 2). As stated in PNNL-13404 (1 of 2, 2 of 2), the water table gradient is too low to be used for\n6 determining flow direction or flow rate at the PUREX Plant cribs immediately east of the IDF site.\n7 Hydraulic conductivity directly beneath the IDF site was estimated from data collected during four slug\n8 tests at well 299-E17-21 and five slug tests of 299-E24-21. The interval tested at 299-E17-21 was the\n9 upper 7.8 m of the unconfined aquifer from 101.3 to 109.1 m depth. That portion of the aquifer is\n10 Hanford formation gravel from 101.3 to 102.1 m depth and Ringold Formation unit E gravels from 102.1\n11 to 109.1 m depth (PNNL-1 1957). The interval tested at well 299-E24-21 was entirely in the Hanford\n12 formation gravel sequence between 95.2 and 101.3 m depth. The best fit value to the data from\n13 299-E17-21 indicated a hydraulic conductivity of about 68.6 meters per day (PNNL-1 1957) and from\n14 299-E24-21 suggested a hydraulic conductivity of 75 meters per day (PNNL-13652).\n15 5.4 Contaminant Plume Description\n16 Although no groundwater monitoring has been done for the IDF, groundwater monitoring has been done\n17 in support of RCRA permitting activities and in support of other activities in the area. The results of that\n18 monitoring show that a regional nitrate plume exists beneath the IDF site (PNNL-14187, I of 2, 2 of 2).\n19 In the south-central 200 East Area, the plume extends in a northwest -southeast direction along the axis\n20 of the Columbia River/Missoula flood channel eroded into the Ringold Formation sediments. The\n21 channel is filled with more transmissive Hanford formation sediments.\n22 5.4.1 Groundwater Contamination\n23 Nitrate, associated with past-practice activities in 200 East Area, is a general groundwater chemistry\n24 parameter and is not a contaminant of concern for the IDF. However, the distribution of existing nitrate\n25 in the groundwater gives an indication of the general groundwater flow direction and the influence that\n26 adjacent sites might have on the IDF.\n27 High nitrate concentrations found near liquid waste disposal facilities located outside the IDF site that\n28 received effluent from the PUREX Plant are decreasing steadily with time. The highest nitrate\n29 concentration found in 2002 was 170,000 pig/L in well 299-E17-9 at the 216-A-36B crib and the crib is\n30 thought to be the source of the nitrate. The drinking water standard for nitrate is 45,000 ptg/L (nitrate\n31 ion).\n32 Nitrate in well 299-E24-18, just inside the east boundary of the IDF site, decreased from a high of\n33 86,300 gg/L in 1990 to a low of 17,000 jig/L in 1993, reflecting the cessation of PUREX Plant operations\n34 in 1988. Since 1993, nitrate has increased to 48,300 gg/L in 2003 (Figure 5.7). The reason for the\n35 increase is not understood. One possibility is related to changing groundwater flow direction. During\n36 PUREX Plant operations, flow direction was probably to the northwest because of effluent discharges to\n37 the B Pond System and PUREX Plant cribs, and nitrate contamination might have spread to the northwest\n38 during that period. Subsequently, liquid discharges to the B Pond System and PUREX Plant cribs have\n39 ceased and the flow direction in the area of the IDF site apparently has returned to the southeast direction.\n40 With that change, higher levels of nitrate contaminated groundwater might be returning to the area from\n41 the northwest.\n42 Except for an anomalous value of 82,600 gg/L in 1988, nitrate concentration in well 299-E24-7 was\n43 steady and ranged between 12,800 and 35,400 g/L between 1985 and 1996 when the well was last\n44 sampled (Figure 5.7). The last two measured values from 1995 and 1996 were 26,000 pg/L. Farther\n45 southwest, nitrate detected in 1998 in well 299-E17-21 in Ringold unit E was 23,600 ptg/L.\n46 5.4.2 Vadose Zone Contamination\n47 Very little characterization and monitoring of the soil have been done at the IDF site because no major\n48 construction or waste disposal activities have occurred in this part of the Hanford Site.\nChapter 5.9\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Implementation of the Integrated Disposal Facility Preoperational Monitoring Plan (RPP-6877) has\n2 begun and characterization activities will occur during the next few years. The Integrated Disposal\n3 Facility Preoperational Monitoring Plan (RPP-6877) has a strong emphasis on vadose zone\n4 characterization and deferred groundwater monitoring to this groundwater monitoring plan. Vadose zone\n5 information resulting from preoperational monitoring will be included, if applicable, in updates to this\n6 groundwater monitoring plan.\n7 The Integrated Disposal Facility Preoperational Monitoring Plan (RPP-6877) identified three areas near\n8 the IDF site that might have had an influence on the vadose zone beneath the site. These are the 218-E-i\n9 Burial Ground and an unplanned release associated with the burial ground; the coal ash pile in the\n10 northwest part of the site; and a transfer line along the northern part of the west boundary of the IDF site\n11 (RPP-6877). Work was outlined in the Integrated Disposal Facility Preoperational Monitoring Plan to\n12 determine whether these three areas had introduced contamination to the site. Appropriate results from\n13 preoperational monitoring will be incorporated into this groundwater monitoring plan as results become\n14 available and as revisions are needed.\n15 In addition to these facilities, the 216-A-38-1, 216-A-45, and 216-A-10 cribs and the 299-E24-1 11\n16 injection well are located east of the IDF site. The 216-A-38-1 crib never was used (DOE/RL-92-04).\n17 The 299-E24-1 11 injection well never received any waste (DOE/RL-92-04). The 216-A-45 and the\n18 216-A 10 cribs both received large quantities of liquid waste (DOE/RL-92-04). Because these latter two\n19 facilities are more than 200 meters from the IDF site, it is unlikely these facilities have affected the soil\n20 beneath the IDF site. Data from the vadose zone in IDF wells drilled along the east side of the site\n21 support this.\n22 5.5 Detection Monitoring Program\n23 Because the IDF has not been constructed, no contaminants have been released to the ground or to the\n24 groundwater.\n25 5.5.1 Indicator Parameters, Waste Constituents, Reaction Products to be Monitored\n26 5.5.1.1 Regulated Constituents\n27 The regulated constituents for this groundwater monitoring plan are the constituents identified on the IDF\n28 Part A Form.\n29 5.5.1.2 Monitoring Parameters\n30 The parameters to be routinely monitored are listed in Table 5.2. These parameters include the indicator\n31 parameters and supplemental parameters.\n32 The indicator parameters will be used to monitor for hazardous constituents reaching the groundwater as a\n33 result of IDF operations. Only the indicator parameters are subject to the statistical methods described in\n34 Section 5.5.4.7. Total organic carbon and total organic halides are indicator parameters selected to\n35 monitor impacts of RCRA regulated organic constituents on the groundwater quality. Specific\n36 conductance is selected as an indicator parameter to monitor impacts of metals and anions on\n37 groundwater quality. pH is a general indicator of groundwater quality. Specific conductance and pH are\n38 measured in the field at the time of sampling. Chromium is included as an indicator parameter because\n39 hexavalent chromium is one of the more mobile of the regulated metals to be disposed of at the IDF and\n40 should be one of the first constituents to enter groundwater if the regulated facility impacts groundwater.\n41 Analyses of alkalinity, anions, and metals are to provide supplemental data on general groundwater\n42 chemistry beneath the IDF. This information aids data interpretation and quality control. Supplemental\n43 parameters will not be used in statistical evaluations. Turbidity is analyzed at the well just before\n44 sampling and provides an indication of the groundwater condition at the time of sampling.\n45 For the first year of monitoring, all parameters listed in Table 5.2 will be monitored twice each quarter to\n46 determine background concentrations.\nChapter 5.10\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 After the first year, indicator and supplemental parameters will be monitored semi-annually. In addition,\n2 field measurements of temperature and turbidity will be made at each sampling event.\n3 During the first sampling event at each well for the first year of monitoring, samples will be collected for\n4 analysis of the indicator parameters, the supplemental parameters, and the Appendix IX constituents\n5 (40 CFR 264) included in IDF Part A Form. After the first sampling event, samples will be collected for\n6 analysis of indicator parameters and supplemental parameters only.\n7 After the first year of sampling, if an indicator parameter suggests there is an impact to groundwater,\n8 additional samples will be collected to verify the initial results. If a statistically significant increase in any\n9 indicator parameter is confirmed, analyses will be made for the regulated parameters in IDF Part A Form.\n10 Monitoring for baseline conditions was completed for the indicator parameters in April 2006 and for the\n11 complete Appendix IX list in January 2007. Semi-annual monitoring has continued since that time with\n12 the collection of four independent samples each semiannual period. During the Pre-Active life, sampling\n13 will continue at the IDF with the collection of one sample each year to maintain the baseline. When the\n14 IDF becomes operational, sampling will revert to four independent samples collected each semiannual\n15 period.\n16 5.5.1.3 Dangerous Waste Characterization\n17 This section describes the waste to be disposed in the IDF and gives background information on how the\n18 constituents of concern (regulated constituents) and indicator parameters were selected.\n19 5.5.1.3.1 Volume of the Waste Package\n20 The IDF will be a single, expandable disposal facility constructed to RCRA Subtitle C standards, half of\n21 which is for disposal of mixed waste the other half will be for disposal of low-level waste. Initial capacity\n22 for mixed waste disposal is 82,000 cubic meters of waste with an ultimate capacity of up to 450,000 cubic\n23 meters of waste. Disposal capacity beyond the initial 82,000 cubic meters will require a modification to\n24 the Part B Permit. The mixed waste types to be disposed in the IDF include vitrified Low Activity Waste\n25 (LAW) from the RPP-WTP and DBVS. Additionally, mixed waste generated by IDF operations will be\n26 disposed of in IDF.\n27 The vitrified LAW will be mostly silicate glass monoliths. The RPP-WTP packages nominally measure\n28 approximately 1.22 m diameter by 2.3 m high and the DBVS package nominally measure approximately\n29 2.4 m wide by 3.1 m high by 7.3 m long. Vitrified LAW will be remote handled.\n30 If other forms of immobilized LAW are considered in the future, this monitoring plan will be amended.\n31 Mixed waste generated through waste operations at IDF will be packaged based on the size of the waste,\n32 with the most common container being galvanized or aluminized 208 liter containers.\n33 5.5.1.3.2 Composition of the Waste Packages\n34 HNF-4921 provides detailed estimates for the inventory of hazardous chemicals in the vitrified LAW feed\n35 and in the vitrified LAW package. The composition of the vitrified LAW package was estimated in\n36 HNF-4921 based on:\n37 1) The Tank Waste Retrieval System Characterization Program tank-by-tank Best Basis Inventories.\n38 2) The latest U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection (DOE/ORP) guidance.\n39 3) The requirements for waste retrieval and vitrification.\n40 4) Available information from waste treatment plant contractors, and (5) proposed operating\n41 scenarios for retrieval of waste from Double Shell Tanks (DSTs) and Single Shell Tanks (SSTs).\n42 5.5.1.4 Behavior of Constituents\n43 Almost all of the regulated constituents for the IDF show some degree of retardation in the vadose zone\n44 and in the saturated zone.\nChapter 5.11\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Table 5.3 indicates the range of expected behaviors in the subsurface at the IDF for selected regulated\n2 constituents. The constituents in Table 5.3 were selected by comparing the expected constituents in the\n3 vitrified LAW package (from HNF-492 1) and the historical inventories of the Hanford Site low-level\n4 burial grounds (from WHC-MR-0008 and WHC-SD-EN-AP-0 15) to 40 CFR 264, Appendix IX (see IDF\n5 Part A Form). The mobilities and solubilities in Table 5.3 give an estimated range for the properties of\n6 the constituents of concern.\n7 5.5.1.5 Detectability\n8 The detection limits in groundwater for each RCRA regulated constituent and the indicator parameters are\n9 given in Table 5.4.\n10 5.5.2 Groundwater Monitoring Program\n11 The following sections provide a description of wells, equipment decontamination, representative\n12 samples, and monitoring wells that are not upgradient.\n13 5.5.2.1 Description of Wells\n14 The groundwater monitoring well network for the IDF ultimately will have eight wells: three\n15 hydraulically upgradient of the facility and five hydraulically downgradient. The downgradient wells will\n16 be placed to sample groundwater passing the point of compliance. The point of compliance at the IDF\n17 site is a plane connecting the groundwater monitoring wells along the southern and eastern sides of the\n18 site in accordance with WAC 173-303-645(6), which states \"The point of compliance is a vertical surface\n19 located at the hydraulically downgradient limit of the waste management area that extends down into the\n20 uppermost aquifer underlying the regulated unit\". The monitoring network will consist of existing and\n21 new, downgradient wells to complete the monitoring network. All wells will be WAC 173-160\n22 compliant.\n23 Three upgradient wells will be used for the IDF monitoring network. Two of these wells (299-E18-1 and\n24 299-E24-21) are existing wells. Upgradient well 299-E24-21 was installed in March 2001 for\n25 characterization of the IDF site. The well, located at the northeast corner of the site (Figure 5.8), was\n26 constructed to RCRA standards as per WAC 173-160. Well 299-E18-1 was installed in 1988 as part of\n27 the 2101-M RCRA monitoring network. The well currently has 2 to 3 meters of water above the bottom\n28 of the screened interval.\n29 The third upgradient well will be a new well located at the northwest corner of the IDF (Figure 5.8). The\n30 well will be constructed to RCRA standard as per WAC 173-160 and screened at the water table.\n31 Three of the downgradient wells are existing wells (299-E17-22, 299-E17-23, and 299-E17-25) that were\n32 installed as WAC 173-160 compliant wells in 2002. Their location is shown in Figure 5.8. The\n33 remaining two downgradient wells will be installed in a sequence coordinated with the IDF operations.\n34 Three phases of trench construction are assumed for the purposes of this monitoring plan. Excavation for\n35 the first phase is scheduled for September 2004 and a new phase is planned for every ten subsequent\n36 years. Changes in the planned operations of the IDF will be reflected in changes to this groundwater\n37 monitoring plan as needed.\n38 The first new downgradient well will be installed along the eastern side of the facility (Figure 5.8) at least\n39 one year before the IDF receives waste. The second new downgradient well will be installed along the\n40 southern boundary of the Site at least one year before the third phase of waste disposal becomes\n41 operational. Both wells will be installed such that at least one year of background data can be obtained\n42 prior to the associated operational phase becoming active. Figure 5.8 shows the sequence for both\n43 groundwater well construction and waste disposal. The locations of all existing and new wells in the IDF\n44 monitoring network are noted on the figure.\n45\nChapter 5.12\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI The placement of the wells for the IDF monitoring network was based on professional judgment. The\n2 efficiency of the resulting groundwater monitoring network was evaluated using a simple two\n3 dimensional, horizontal transport model called the monitoring efficiency model (MEMO) (Wilson et al.\n4 1992). The model estimates the efficiency of a monitoring network at the point of compliance. The\n5 model simulates a contaminant plume originating from a series of grid points within the disposal facility\n6 using the Domenico-Robbins method (Domenico and Robbins, 1985). The model calculates both\n7 advective flow and dispersive flow in two dimensions and determines whether the resulting plume will be\n8 detected by a monitoring well before the plume travels some selected distance beyond the disposal facility\n9 boundary. The selected distance is termed the buffer zone. (A longitudinal dispersivity of 95 meters and\n10 horizontal dispersivity of 9.5 meters were used to evaluate the monitoring network in Figure 5.8.)\n11 Outputs from the model are the monitoring efficiency and a map of the disposal facility showing areas\n12 where leaks would not be detected under the given site-specific parameters provided as input to the\n13 model. Monitoring efficiency is defined as the ratio of the area within a disposal facility from which a\n14 release likely would be detected to the total area of the disposal facility, expressed as a percentage.\n15 The monitoring efficiency calculated by the MEMO model for the proposed monitoring network is 100%\n16 for phase I, 98% for phase II, and 99% for phase III (Figure 5.8).\n17 All wells for the IDF site will be constructed to meet WAC 173-160 requirements. The wells will be\n18 protected at the surface with a concrete pad, protective posts, a protective outer casing, and locking cap.\n19 The casing and screen will be stainless steel, an appropriate filter pack for the screen slot size will be\n20 used, and an annular seal of bentonite and cement will be emplaced. All wells will be screened at the\n21 water table with 10.6 meter long screens, which will accommodate the greatest possible future decrease in\n22 water level. The wells will be developed and dedicated sampling pumps will be installed.\n23 New wells will be surveyed with a down hole gyroscope at the time of construction to determine any\n24 deviation from vertical so that corrections can be made to subsequent water level measurements.\n25 Gyroscope surveys will also be conducted on existing wells in the network prior to IDF operations.\n26 5.5.2.2 Equipment Decontamination\n27 Drilling equipment will be decontaminated using high temperature and pressure [82oC (1800F) and\n28 greater than 70.3 kg/cm2 (1,000 psi)] washing with an approved cleaning solution. The equipment will be\n29 rinsed with clean water. The procedure is specified in controlled manuals.\n30 Equipment for collecting soil samples during drilling for later chemical analysis and for measuring the\n31 water table will be decontaminated according to established methods. The methods call for washing\n32 equipment with phosphate free detergent, rinsing three times with reverse osmosis/de-ionized water,\n33 rinsing once with IM or 10% nitric acid (glass or stainless steel equipment only), rinsing three more times\n34 with reverse osmosis/de-ionized water, and a final rinse with chromatograph grade hexane. Equipment\n35 will be dried for 50 minutes at 100oC (2120F). After drying, equipment will be wrapped in unused\n36 aluminum foil and sealed with tape.\n37 No decontamination of groundwater sampling equipment will be necessary because each well will have a\n38 dedicated pump.\n39 5.5.2.3 Representative Samples\n40 No groundwater chemistry data specific to the IDF site are available. Sample representativeness will be\n41 addressed after collection of the first year of background data.\n42 5.5.2.4 Locations of Background Groundwater Monitoring Wells that are not Upgradient\n43 All background groundwater monitoring wells at the IDF are located upgradient.\nChapter 5.13\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 5.5.3 Background Values\n2 Groundwater background (baseline) has not been established for the IDF site. Background data will be\n3 determined before construction of the site using the wells described previously (Section 5.5.2.1) for the\n4 use of upgradient vs. downgradient comparisons (Section 5.5.4.7).\n5 5.5.3.1 Plan for Establishing Groundwater Quality Data\n6 Well location, sampling frequency, sampling quantity, and background values are discussed in the\n7 following sections.\n8 5.5.3.1.1 Well Locations\n9 Groundwater monitoring wells in the IDF monitoring network were described in Section 5.5.2.1 and their\n10 locations are shown on Figure 5.8.\n11 5.5.3.1.2 Sampling Frequency\n12 Eight background samples will be collected during the first year of monitoring from phase I wells. Two\n13 samples will be collected quarterly for one year. For the new well needed for phase III operations, two\n14 samples will be collected quarterly for one year before phase III is operational. For all wells, two\n15 independent samples will be collected each quarter, one per month for 2 consecutive months followed by\n16 a month of non-sampling. This sequence will be repeated each quarter during the first year of monitoring.\n17 Section 5.5.3.1.3 provides frequency logic.\n18 5.5.3.1.3 Sampling Quantites\n19 The performance of the statistical method proposed for the IDF is evaluated by the following two goals:\n20 * To have adequate statistical power to detect real contamination when contamination occurs.\n21 * To keep the network wide Type I error (across all constituents and wells being tested) at an\n22 acceptably low level (approximately 5%). [Note that the Type I error in the detection monitoring\n23 stage equates to the false positive rate, that is, the probability that the test will indicate\n24 contamination has occurred although no contamination has truly occurred.]\n25 The statistical power and the network-side false positive rate of a test depend on several factors, including\n26 the background sample size, the type of proposed test, and the number of comparisons. All other factors\n27 being equal, the larger the sample size is (i.e., the number of background samples), the greater the\n28 statistical power is. Therefore, as recommended in EPA/530-R-93-003, at least eight independent\n29 samples will be collected from each well for background purposes. This is a sufficient number of samples\n30 to establish a reliable background (EPA/530-R-93-003) and meets the regulations in\n31 WAC 173-303-645(9)(d).\n32 5.5.3.1.4 Background Values\n33 The default method of analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be used to detect any impact on groundwater\n34 quality at the IDF where the mean of the measurements from compliance (downgradient) wells is\n35 compared to the mean of the distribution of background data from the upgradient wells. The details of the\n36 method are described in Section 5.5.4.7.1.\n37 5.5.4 Sampling, Analysis and Statistical Procedures\n38 Sample collection, sample preservation and transfer/shipment, analytical procedures, chain of custody and\n39 additional requirements for compliance point monitoring are discussed in the following sections.\n40 5.5.4.1 Sample Collection\n41 Groundwater sampling procedures, sample collection documentation, sample preservation and\n42 transfer/shipment, and chain-of-custody requirements are described in subcontractor operating\n43 procedures/manuals and in a quality assurance project plan for the Hanford Groundwater Performance\n44 Assessment Project.\nChapter 5.14\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Quality requirements for sampling activities, including requirements for procedures, containers, transport,\n2 storage, chain of custody, and records requirements, are specified in a statement of work (SOW) to\n3 subcontractors. To ensure that samples of known quality are obtained, the subcontractor will be required\n4 to use contractor controlled procedures based on standard methods for groundwater sampling whenever\n5 possible. The procedures will be reviewed for technical quality and consistency. In addition, periodic\n6 assessments of sample collection activities will be performed to ensure further that procedures are\n7 followed to maintain sample quality and integrity. The following is a brief description of the sampling\n8 requirements.\n9 Samples generally will be collected after three casing volumes of groundwater are withdrawn or after the\n10 field parameters pH, temperature, and specific conductance have stabilized. Field parameters are\n11 measured in a flow through chamber. Turbidity should be equal to or below 5 NTU (nephelometric\n12 turbidity units) before sample collection if possible. Sample preservatives will be added to the collection\n13 bottles in the laboratory before their use in the field. Samples to be analyzed for metals will be filtered in\n14 the field to ensure results represent dissolved metals and do not include particulates (40 CFR 136.3).\n15 Duplicates, trip blanks, and field equipment blanks will be collected as part of the general quality control\n16 program.\n17 Water level measurements will be made each time a well is sampled. Procedures developed in\n18 accordance with the techniques described in American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM 1988),\n19 Garber and Koopman (1968), and U. S. Geological Survey (1977) will be followed to measure water\n20 levels. Water levels will be measured primarily with laminated steel electrical sounding tapes, although\n21 graduated steel tapes are used occasionally.\n22 5.5.4.2 Sample Preservation and Shipment\n23 Sample preservation will be done in accordance with existing procedures. A chemical preservative label\n24 will be affixed to the sample container listing the specific preservative. The brand name, lot number,\n25 concentration, and date opened of the preservatives will be recorded. A calibrated dispenser or pipette\n26 will be used to dispense preservatives. Appropriate measures will be taken to eliminate any potential for\n27 cross contamination.\n28 Sample packaging and transfer/shipping will be done in accordance with subcontract procedures.\n29 Samples will be labeled and sealed with evidence tape, wrapped with bubble wrap, and placed in a\n30 Department of Transportation approved container with coolant (if required). Hazardous samples will\n31 have packaging parameters determined by associated hazards. A chain of custody will accompany all\n32 samples.\n33 5.5.4.3 Analytical Procedures\n34 The methods for analysis of chemical constituents in groundwater will conform to Test Methods for\n35 Evaluating Solid Wastes: Physical/Chemical Methods, 3rd Ed. (SW-846); Methods for Chemical Analysis\n36 of Water and Wastes (EPA-600/4-79-020) or other EPA methods; and the Annual Book ofASTM\n37 Standards (American Society for Testing and Materials, 1986). The methods used to obtain routine data\n38 results are presented in Table 5.4.\n39 5.5.4.3.1 Data Storage and Retrieval\n40 All contract analytical laboratory results will be submitted by the laboratory to be loaded into the Hanford\n41 Environmental Information System (HEIS) database. Most data are received from the laboratory in\n42 electronic form, and will be loaded electronically. Parameters measured in the field will be entered into\n43 HEIS either manually or through electronic transfer. Hard copy data reports are received for records\n44 storage. Data from the HEIS database will be retrieved for data validation, data reduction, and trend\n45 analysis. Copies of supporting analytical data will be sent yearly to Pacific Northwest National\n46 Laboratory (PNNL) for storage.\nChapter 5.15\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 5.5.4.3.2 Data Verification and Validation\n2 Verification of analytical data provided by the subcontracted laboratory will be performed in accordance\n3 with established procedure. This procedure includes checks for: (1) completeness of hardcopy\n4 deliverable, (2) condition of samples on receipt by the laboratory, (3) problems that arose during the\n5 analysis of the samples, and (4) correct reporting of results. The procedure also describes the actions to\n6 be taken if data are incomplete or deficient.\n7 Verification and validation of groundwater chemistry data will be performed according to established\n8 procedures. Data will be reviewed quarterly to assure the data are complete and representative. The\n9 review will include evaluation of quality control data (e.g., field blanks, duplicates, and laboratory blanks)\n10 and a technical review by a project scientist familiar with the hydrogeology of the site. The technical\n11 review might include comparison of recent data to historical trends and comparison of related\n12 constituents. Suspect data will be investigated through the data review process in accordance with\n13 established procedures and will be flagged in the database.\n14 5.5.4.3.3 Reporting\n15 Groundwater chemistry and water level data will be reviewed after each sampling event and will be\n16 available in the HEIS database. The results of the statistical evaluation and associated information will be\n17 submitted to Ecology quarterly in Hanford Site groundwater monitoring reports.\n18 If statistically, significant evidence of contamination is determined (after waste has been introduced to the\n19 facility and after the confirmation re-sampling evaluation process) for one or more of the indicator\n20 parameters at any monitoring well at the compliance point, and if the owner or operator decides not to\n21 make a false positive claim, the following will be performed.\n22 * Notify Ecology in writing within 7 days of the finding indicating which chemical parameters or\n23 dangerous waste constituents have shown statistically significant evidence of contamination.\n24 * Determine whether dangerous constituents are present and, if so, in what concentration.\n25 * The owner or operator might re-sample within I month and repeat the analysis for those\n26 compounds detected in the above (i.e., second bullet). The resample data will be compared with\n27 the trigger value.\n28 * Submit an application for a permit modification, if necessary, to establish a compliance\n29 monitoring program to Ecology in 90 days or within the time agreed to in writing by Ecology.\n30 The dangerous constituents detected, either in the initial analysis or in the second confirmation analysis,\n31 will form the basis for compliance monitoring.\n32 In case of a false positive claim [as allowed by WAC 173-303-645(9)(g)(vi)], the following will apply.\n33 * Notify Ecology in writing within 7 days of the finding (i.e., exceedance) and indicate that a false\n34 positive claim will be made.\n35 * Submit a report to Ecology within 90 days or within the time agreed to in writing by Ecology.\n36 This report should demonstrate that a source other than the regulated unit caused the\n37 contamination or that the contamination resulted from an error in sampling, analysis, evaluation,\n38 or natural variation in groundwater chemistry.\n39 * Submit an application for a permit modification, if necessary, to make any appropriate changes to\n40 the detection monitoring program within 90 days or within the time agreed to in writing by\n41 Ecology.\n42 * Continue to monitor in accordance with the detection monitoring program.\n43 * Submit an application for a permit modification, if the detection monitoring program is\n44 determined to no longer satisfy the requirements [of WAC 173-303-645(9)], to make any\n45 appropriate changes to the program within 90 days or within the time agreed to in writing by\n46 Ecology.\nChapter 5.16\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 5.5.4.4 Chain of Custody\n2 The procedures used for chain-of-custody control of samples are documented in existing manuals. The\n3 procedure requires that each transfer of custody shall be documented by the signatures of the custodian\n4 relinquishing the samples and the custodian receiving the samples, as well as the time and date of transfer.\n5 The laboratory custodian will sign and date the chain-of-custody form upon receipt of the samples at the\n6 laboratory.\n7 5.5.4.5 Additional Requirements for Compliance Point Monitoring\n8 This section describes sampling frequency and determination of groundwater quality for the samples from\n9 the groundwater monitoring network. Compliance data will be compared to baseline data collected from\n10 the upgradient wells and a determination of impacts to groundwater will be made using the proposed\n11 ANOVA method (explained in Section 5.5.4.7.1).\n12 5.5.4.5.1 Sampling Frequency\n13 Under final status regulations, the default sampling procedure states that a sequence of at least four\n14 samples from each well (background and compliance wells) must be collected at least semiannually\n15 during detection monitoring at an interval that ensures, to the greatest extent technically feasible, that an\n16 independent sample is obtained [40 CFR 264.97(g)(1) and (2), WAC 173-303-645(8)(g)(i) and (ii), and\n17 (9)(d)].\n18 The default sampling procedures are adopted for the IDF Active life as follows: four independent samples\n19 from each groundwater monitoring well will be sampled for the indicator parameters (Table 5.2)\n20 semiannually during the active life of the regulated unit (including the closure period), one per month for\n21 four consecutive months followed by two months of non-sampling. The mean of the measurements from\n22 the downgradient wells will be compared semiannually to the mean of the distribution of the background\n23 data using ANOVA.\n24 Semi-annual monitoring has been accomplished at the IDF since January 2007 with the collection of four\n25 independent samples each semiannual period. During the Pre-Active life, sampling will continue at the\n26 IDF with the collection of one sample each year to maintain the baseline. During Active life, sampling\n27 will revert to four independent samples collected each semiannual period described above.\n28 5.5.4.5.2 Compliance Point Groundwater Quality Values\n29 The groundwater quality data collected from the groundwater monitoring wells will be compared to the\n30 mean of the background data from upgradient wells for each constituent by ANOVA. If the mean is\n31 calculated from transformed baseline data (logarithmic transformation or nonparametric approach), then\n32 the monitoring data will be transformed accordingly; otherwise, the original monitoring data will be used\n33 in the comparisons.\n34 During detection monitoring, data verification will be applied in case of an initial exceedance. For\n35 ANOVA test, if the test of hypothesis of equal means for all wells fails, post hoc comparisons are needed\n36 to determine which compliance well(s) is (are) contaminated. This will be done by comparing\n37 concentration differences (called contrasts in the ANOVA and multiple comparison framework) between\n38 each compliance well with the background wells (EPA/530-SW-89-026). If the contaminated compliance\n39 well(s) is (are) determined by post hoc comparisons, verification sampling will be implemented for the\n40 constituent(s) in question. Verification sampling is needed to determine if the exceedance is an artifact\n41 caused by an error in sampling, analysis, or statistical evaluation or an actual variation in groundwater\n42 chemistry. A collection of at least four measurements from the re-sampled compliance well(s) is required\n43 to perform ANOVA test on comparison with the mean of the background data (EPA/530-R-93-003).\n44 Adequate time should elapse to ensure statistical independence between the original measurements and\n45 the re-sample measurements, which is assured by the sampling frequency proposed in Section 5.5.4.5.1.\n46 The existing nitrate plume beneath the IDF site is described in Section 5.4.1. Nitrate is not included in\n47 IDF Part A Form and, therefore, is not a constituent of concern for the IDF.\nChapter 5.17\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Existing groundwater conditions will be monitored by the indicator parameters and supplemental\n2 constituents as described in Section 5.5.1. Specific conductance will respond to nitrate so that any\n3 changes in the nitrate concentration will be reflected by changes in the indicator parameter specific\n4 conductance.\n5 Anion analysis is one of the supplemental constituents to be monitored at the IDF site. Anion analysis\n6 will determine the nitrate concentration. Therefore, through comparison of regression lines of specific\n7 conductance and nitrate (Zar,1999) and/or contaminant source analysis (Gibbons, 1994), it can be\n8 determined whether any change in specific conductance is due to a change in nitrate. If a change in\n9 specific conductance is due to a change in nitrate, then that specific conductance change is not attributed\n10 to the IDF. If, however, a statistically significant change in specific conductance is not attributable to\n11 nitrate, verification sampling will occur as described above.\n12 5.5.4.6 Annual Determination\n13 Groundwater flow rate and flow direction at the IDF site will be determined annually for the uppermost\n14 aquifer. Flow rate will be determined by calculation using the groundwater gradient, and the Darcy flow\n15 equation, vh = Khih/ne, where Vh is the horizontal groundwater velocity, Kh is the horizontal hydraulic\n16 conductivity, ih is the horizontal hydraulic gradient, and ne is the effective porosity. Effective porosities\n17 used at Hanford Site RCRA regulated units are on the order of 0.1 to 0.3 (PNNL-14187, 1 of 2, 2 of 2);\n18 effective porosity might be determined specifically for the IDF from hydrologic tests.\n19 Hydraulic gradients will be determined from measurements of water levels.\n20 5.5.4.7 Statistical Determination\n21 This section describes the method of statistical evaluation and the statistical procedures to indicate\n22 whether dangerous waste or dangerous waste constituents from the IDF might have entered the\n23 groundwater in the uppermost aquifer. These evaluations will be made as soon as practicable after\n24 validation of the full data set from each sampling event.\n25 The monitoring program periodically will re-evaluate the statistical tests being used. The methods\n26 described will be reviewed during and after background, data are collected to ensure the methods are the\n27 most appropriate, considering site conditions.\n28 The goal of a RCRA final status detection-monitoring program [WAC 173-303-645(9)] is to monitor for\n29 indicator parameters that provide a reliable indication of the presence of dangerous constituents in\n30 groundwater in the uppermost aquifer beneath the site. This is accomplished by testing for statistically\n31 significant changes in concentrations of indicators in downgradient wells relative to baseline values. The\n32 default statistical method ANOVA is proposed for the detection monitoring program of the IDF. The\n33 proposed statistical method is consistent with EPA/530-SW-89-026, EPA/530-R-93-003, and\n34 WAC 173-303-645.\n35 The number of tested constituents will be limited to the indicators to maintain a sufficiently low false-\n36 positive rate (EPA/530-R-93-003, page 62; Gibbons 1994, page 16). Verification sampling is an integral\n37 part of the statistical design to lower the overall false-positive rate and determine whether the difference\n38 between background and compliance-point data is an artifact caused by an error in sampling, analysis, or\n39 statistical evaluation (Section 5.5.4.5.2).\n40 5.5.4.7.1 Statistical Procedure\n41 In accordance with WAC 173-303-645(8)(h), acceptable statistical methodology includes analysis of\n42 variance (ANOVA), tolerance intervals, prediction intervals, control charts, test of proportions, or other\n43 statistical methods approved by Ecology. The type of monitoring, the nature of the data, the proportions\n44 of non-detects, and spatial and temporal variations are some of the important factors to be considered in\n45 the selection of appropriate statistical methods. The EPA default method ANOVA will be implemented\n46 for the IDF site to compare the differences of means of the measurements from upgradient and\n47 downgradient wells.\nChapter 5.18\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The detailed discussions of the ANOVA test can be found in EPA/530-SW-89-026 and statistical\n2 textbooks (Gilbert, 1987; Casella and Berger. 1990; Davis, 2002), and can be executed using commercial\n3 statistical software such as SAS or SYSTAT. Under WAC 173-303-645(8)(i)(ii), the proposed statistical\n4 method must comply with the performance standard, that is, for a multiple comparisons procedure the\n5 Type I error level must be no less than 0.05, and maintained at the level of no less than 0.01 for individual\n6 well comparisons. By definition, Type I error is the false rejection rate of the null hypothesis (Ho) of the\n7 statistical test. In detection or compliance monitoring, the statistical test is defined as Ho: no release, i.e.,\n8 the means of the distributions from upgradient and downgradient wells are the same, and the alternative\n9 (Ha) evidence of release, e.g., \"clean until proven contaminated\" (EPA/530-R-93-003). Therefore, the\n10 proposed statistical method must comply with the requirement of maintaining Type I error, which equates\n11 false positive rate in the stage of detection monitoring at approximate 5% level. As described in\n12 EPA/530-SW-89-026, ANOVA procedures have the advantages of combining multiple downgradient into\n13 a single statistical test, thus enabling the network-wide false positive rate for any single constituent (not\n14 multiple constituents) to be kept at 5 percent, and also maintain reasonable power for detecting\n15 contamination.\n16 The details of the ANOVA procedures are described as follows (EPA/530-SW-89-026):\n17 * First, check the proportion of non-detects of the measurements from the upgradient and\n18 downgradient wells. When the proportion of non-detects is less than 15%, the non-detects will be\n19 reported as one-half the minimum detection limit or practical quantitation limit, and proceed with\n20 parametric ANOVA analysis. When the proportion of non-detects is greater than 15%,\n21 non-parametric ANOVA analysis will be used for comparing the means of downgradient and\n22 upgradient wells.\n23 * Evaluate the distributions of the measurements from the upgradient and downgradient wells. The\n24 assumptions with parametric ANOVA test are the residuals are normally distributed with equal\n25 variance. The normality of the distribution the residuals can be checked using coefficient of\n26 variation, plotting the data on probability plot, and/or Shapiro-Wilk's test (EPA/530-SW-89-026;\n27 Gibbons, 1994). The assumption of normality usually can be met by log-transforming the data or\n28 by other Box-Cox transformations. When the assumptions of normality and lognormality cannot\n29 be justified, the non-parametric ANOVA method will be used for the IDF. Bartlett's test can be\n30 used in checking equality, or homogeneity, of variances.\n31 * The parametric ANOVA procedures include:\n32 * Assume a monitoring network with k wells, and total number of observations N. First,\n33 compute well total, well mean, and well residuals (observations subtracted by well mean) for\n34 each well, and grand total and mean of all observations (all wells). The well residuals are\n35 used to check the assumption of normality.\n36 * Compute the sum of squares of difference between well means and the grand mean, SSwells\n37 that is a measure of the variability between wells with (k-1) degrees of freedom.\n38 * Compute the total sum of squares of differences between all observations and the grand\n39 mean, SStotal, which is a measure of the variability in all observations with (N-1) degrees of\n40 freedom.\n41 * Compute the sum of squares of differences of observations within wells from the well means,\n42 SSerror, which is a measure of the variability within wells with (N-k) degrees of freedom\n43 calculated by the following subtraction:\n44 SSnor = SStotal -SSwells\n45 * Test the hypothesis of equal means for all k wells by computing F value with the means\n46 squares of differences:\n47 F = MSwells / MSeor\nChapter 5.19\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 where the means of squares are the sums of squares divided by the associated degrees of\n2 freedom, that is, MSwenls = SSwelns / (k-1), and MSerror = SSerror / (N-k). Compare the F value to\n3 the tabulated F statistics with (k-1) and (N-k) degress of freedom at the 5% significance level\n4 (EPA/530-SW 89-026, Appendix B, Table 2). If the calculated F value exceeds the tabulated\n5 F statistics, the null hypothesis of equal well means is rejected. Proceed with test of contrasts\n6 in the next step. Otherwise, the hypothesis of equal means is accepted that there is no\n7 significant difference between the concentrations at k wells (upgradient and downgradient\n8 wells), that is, no evidence of contamination.\n9 * If the hypothesis of equal well means is rejected, contrasts (concentration differences between a\n10 compliance well and background wells) will be tested for each compliance well to determine\n11 which compliance well(s) is (are) contaminated. Bonferroni t-statistics will be computed to\n12 determine if the significant F value is due to difference between background and compliance\n13 wells. Assume that of the k wells, kb are background (upgradient) wells, and kc are compliance\n14 (downgradient) wells (i.e., kb + k, = k). Each of the k, compliance wells is compared to the mean\n15 of the background wells as the following steps:\n16 * Compute the mean mb from the kb background wells with a total of nb samples.\n17 * Compute the difference D, between the mean from the i' compliance well and the mean from\n18 the background wells.\n19 * Compute the standard error of the difference from the i' compliance well with ni observations\n20 as:\n21 SEi= [MSrror (1/nb + /Di)1\n22 where MSerror is computed previously as the measure of variability within wells.\n23 * Obtain the t-statistics from Bonferroni's t-table (EPA/530-SW-89-026, Appendix B, Table 3)\n24 with a significance level of (u=0.05/ke) but no less than 0.01 (for individual comparison) and\n25 (N-k) degrees of freedom. The critical value for the il compliance well is defined as Ci = SEi\n26 x t.\n27 * If the difference Di exceeds the critical value Ci, conclude that the mean of the i' compliance\n28 well is significantly higher than the mean of the background wells. Otherwise, conclude that\n29 the well is not contaminated.\n30 * The one-way non-parametric ANOVA tests the null hypothesis that the data from each well come\n31 from the same continuous distribution and hence have the same median. The procedures, called\n32 the Kruskal-Wallis test, include the following steps:\n33 * Assume the monitoring network as defined previously with a total of N observations from k\n34 wells (kb background wells and kc compliance wells). Rank all N observations from least (1)\n35 to greatest (N). Let the background wells be group 1, and denote the compliance wells as\n36 group 2 to (kc+1). (one group per compliance well).\n37 * Compute the sum (Ri) and the average (mi) of the ranks of the ni observations in the ith\n38 group.\n39 * Compute the Kruskal-Wallis statistics (H) as\n40 H 2 -3(N + 1)\nN (N + 1I) i= n1\n41 * Compare the calculated H value to the tabulated chi-squared value with kc degrees of freedom\n42 (EPA/530-SW-89-026, Appendix B, Table 1). The null hypothesis of equal medians is rejected\n43 when the calculated H value exceeds the tabulated critical value.\nChapter 5.20\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * When the null hypothesis of equal medians is rejected, compute the critical difference Ci for\n2 each compliance well to the background data (group 1 with nb observations):\n3 C, = Z(0 05 / kc) N(N+1) 1 ]1/2\n12 nb i,\n4 Where Z(O.05/ kc) is the upper (0.05/kc) percentile from the standard normal distribution\n5 (EPA/530-SW-89-026, Appendix B, Table 4). If there are more than five compliance wells\n6 (k; > 5), use Zool, the upper one-percentile from the standard normal distribution (Zo o=2.32) for\n7 individual comparison (WAC 173-303-645(8)(i)(ii)).\n8 * Compute the difference (Di = mi -mi) of average rank mi (i=2 to kc+1) for each compliance well\n9 to the background (mi). Compare the difference Di to the critical value Ci for each compliance\n10 well. If Di exceeds Ci, conclude that the median of the il compliance well is significantly higher\n11 than the background median.\n12 * As monitoring continues, the background data will be updated periodically (e.g., every year or\n13 two) to incorporate the new data from upgradient wells. This updating process will continue for\n14 the life of the monitoring program. Prior to updating older background data with more recent\n15 results, a two-sample t-test will be run to compare the older concentration levels with the\n16 concentrations of the proposed update samples. If the t-test does not show a significant difference\n17 at the 5 percent significant level, proceed to re-estimate the baseline parameters by including the\n18 more recent data. If the t-test does show a significant difference, the newer data will not be\n19 included as background unless some specific factors can be, identified explaining why\n20 background levels at the IDF site have naturally changed (EPA/530-R93-003).\n21 Formal testing for outliers will be done when an observation of the background data seems inconsistently\n22 high (by orders of magnitude) compared to the rest of the data set in order to avoid the artificial increase\n23 of the mean of the background data and a corresponding increase of the false negative rate. Statistical\n24 methods such as the Grubbs' method (Grubbs, 1969), the box-and-whisker plot (Ostle and Malone, 1988),\n25 EPA guidance (EPA/530-SW-89-026, p. 11-14) and/or American Society for Testing and Materials\n26 guidance (ASTM 1996) will be used for testing outliers. The outliers must be checked to determine if the\n27 measurements are in error and need to be corrected or excluded from calculating the background mean. If\n28 no specific error is found, the measurements must be retained in the data.\n29 A statistically significant exceedance over background (baseline) levels only indicates that the new\n30 measurement in a particular monitoring well for a particular constituent is inconsistent with chance\n31 expectations based on the available sample of background (baseline) measurements. Any statistical result\n32 must be supported by other information to determine if a waste disposal facility has impacted\n33 groundwater (ASTM 1996).\n34 5.5.4.7.2 Results\n35 Sampling and analysis results are reviewed at least semiannually (i.e., after each sampling event) and are\n36 available in HEIS. The DOE will submit results of statistical evaluations to Ecology.\n37 5.5.5 Compliance Monitoring Program\n38 A compliance monitoring program that satisfies requirements set forth in WAC 173-303-645(10) will be\n39 established for the IDF if detection-level monitoring reveals statistically significant evidence of dangerous\n40 waste contamination from sources within the regulated unit. If compliance monitoring is required, DOE\n41 will submit a revised monitoring plan to Ecology specifying dangerous constituents to be monitored,\n42 sampling and analysis protocols, statistical evaluation methods, etc. In the compliance monitoring\n43 program, the dangerous constituents or parameters will be compared to concentration limits specified in\n44 the facility permit as discussed in WAC 173-303-645(5) during the compliance period.\nChapter 5.21\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 The RCRA regulations [WAC 173-303-645(9)(g)] state that if a statistical exceedance occurs in a\n2 downgradient well, the entire network immediately must be resampled and analyzed for the constituents\n3 in Appendix IX of 40 CFR 264. This sampling would be conducted in parallel with a required permit\n4 modification. Appendix IX is an extensive list including a wide variety of volatile and semivolatile\n5 organic compounds and trace metals. It is prudent to narrow the analyte list to the specific exceedance\n6 event; e.g., if the exceeding contaminant is total organic halides, the project would analyze for the\n7 halogenated hydrocarbons most likely to be present in the area. Results of the resampling will form the\n8 basis for returning to detection monitoring or designing a compliance monitoring program.\n9 5.5.6 Corrective Action Program\n10 If, at a point of compliance (a well), dangerous constituents of concern are measured in the groundwater\n11 at concentrations that exceed the applicable groundwater concentration limit, Ecology must be notified in\n12 7 days, and an application to modify the permit to include a corrective action plan must be sent to\n13 Ecology within 90 days or within the time agreed to by Ecology. A description of the groundwater\n14 monitoring plan, including all additional corrective actions that are appropriate for a corrective action\n15 program will be prepared and submitted to Ecology when the need for corrective action first is identified.\nChapter 5.22\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n200 East Area\nO0\nE\n299-E28-17 0\n200-E24-4\n*299-E23-1\n4th Street 299-E23-2\n0299-E24-21\n20_-E24-7 299-E24-17\n299-E24-16\n299-E18-3 -41 * 299-1 7-9\nS2 299-E29 E *299-E17-14 299-El 8-2 p'299-El 7-20\n* -299-E18-4 299-E17-22. 299-E17-17\n299-E18-1 299-El7-1340 *0299-E17-16\n299-El 9-1 299-E17-12 299-E17-18\n99-E17-25--J : C29-El 7-210 0 0299-E17-23\n699-E37-47A\nIntegrated Disposal\n299-E13-14 Facility Site0 299-E13-10\n*Groundwater 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 meters\nMonitoring Well I I I\n0 1000 2000 3000 4000 feet\nG03100106-1\nFigure 5.1. Location of the IOF and Nearby Boreholes\n2\n3\nChapter 5.23\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n* * * Fault, bar and ball on down throw side,\nteeth on thrust fault\n... Anticline 01 = Loess\nSyncline Qa = Alluvium\nS i Qda = Active Sand Dunes\nStabilized Sand Dunes\nHanford formation -Sands\n0 1 2 3 Hanford formation -Gravel\nKilometers ~Columbia River Basalt Group\n200 East Area\nCntegrated May\n-.... F toJunction\n:Fault\nR26E R27E\n1 Figure 5.2. Geologic Map of the 200 East and 200 West Areas and Vicinity\n2\n3.\nChapter 5.24\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nAge Epoch Formation\n0 Ka Surficial\nDeposits\n0\n13 Ka Touchet Beds\nPasco Gravels\n11 Ma a. LL Cold Creek unit\n34 Ma\nmember of\nSavage Island\n,2 member of\nCL Taylor Flat\nE\n8\nL Unit E\nUnit C member of\nWooded Island\nUnit 0\nUnit D\nUnit A-\n.Ma Snipes Mountain\n85MConglomerate\n2 0Saddle Mountain Basalt\n14,5 MaE\nWanapum Basalt\n15.6 Ma E\nGrande Ronde\n=i Basalt\n17,0 Ma\n17.5 Me Imnaha Basalt\nFigure 5.3. Stratigraphy of the Hanford Site\nChapter 5.25\n A Integrated Disposal Facility Site A'\nSouthwest Northeast\n299-El3-10 299-E17-21 299-E24-7 299-E24-21 299-E24-4\nEl. 735 El 735 EL. 71 El. 715' EL 607'\n-su..ac c c zso Elevation\nOF I-I(7r $ c Fow o War\nS. Layet 3 7 e\ntoo- 21W 100 L-- L\n200\n(00\n0La2\n0000 20) 4\nUnit Et Unts\n_ _ayS Sand SavdlHanod\nrSi htlyll Gravelly Sat i M d y Clay\nS Gravely Sand 40\nK l 1 -a entative Correlations-~~~~~ ----\n4000 1031 (.\no a0\nG. ooUnitCA\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n-- --122.28_ 12236 122.3 2\n2 --- -122 12-3122 .30*125.1\n122 12- *T122.33P\n211 4 y123 123\n122.12 124\n-->12211223922.30 1\n1213 3W S c a22.5 -- atrTa2eCntur8\n* 4* 12240 122.3 - infe2\n*22.3 122.324\n122.3 122. *22. 12123\n12 2 3 7 0 0 0 1 0 m2 -2 .4\n%'*2122446\n* 1224.72-- an-hortDS-10Na--em-rl--M-------- \n2 Fgue 5.WaerTabe apfo th Hnfrd it 20 ate lerelarc,202122.3\n33 4122.49\nCha2ter 5.27.1226oj&0100 2;.250 3 80004.8\n122.723\n32.3\nChapter 5.2\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n125.5\nHydrographs\n124.5\n--299-E18-1\n299-W24-18\n124- 124 't299-W23-1\n123.5 -\n123\n122.5 -\n122\n1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003\nMeasurement Date\n125.5\n125\n124.5\n124\n1 123.5 \n'\n123\n2-- 99-E23-2\n299-E24-18\n299-E24-17\n12215\n122\nJan 60 Jan-65 Jan-70 Jan-75 Jan-80 Jan-85 Jan-90 Jan-95 Jan-00\nDate\nFigure 5.6. Hydrographs for Wells Near the IDF Site\nChapter 5.28\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n125\n124.5\n124\nS123.5\n123\n--299-E23-1\n-299-E24-7\n122.5\n122-\nJan-60 Jan-65 Jan-70 Jan-75 Jan-80 Jan-85 Jan-90 Jan-95 Jan-00\nDate\n100000\n90000\n80000 Nitrate\n70000 - -299-E24-7\n-W-299-E24-18\n60000\n50000\n40000\n30000\n20000\n10000\n0-\nJan-57 Jan-62 Jan-67 Jan-72 Jan-77 Jan-82 Jan-87 Jan-92 Jan-97 Jan-02\nSample Date\n1\n2 Figure 5.7. Concentration versus Time for Nitrate in Wells 299-E24-7 and 299-E24-18\n3\nChapter 5.29\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n299-E24-21\n135600 A New Upgradient Well\n135400-\nIDF Trench\n299-E18-1\n135200*\nNew Downgradient Well #1\noHydraulic Gradient Zones (degrees)\nMonitoring Efficiency = 100%\n134800. 299-E17-25 299-E17-23\n573600, 574000. 574400 574800.\nI 299-E24-21\n135600. New Upgradient Well\nPHASE II\n135400\nIDF Trench\n299-E1l8-1\n135200\nL ~299-E17-2\nNew Downgradient Well #1\n135000 145' .\ngHydraulic Gradient Zones (degrees)\nMonitoring Efficiency = 98%\n134800 299-E17-25 299-E17-23\n573600 574000. 574400. 574800\n16 C * 299-E24-21\n135600. New Upgradient Well\nPHASE III\n135400\n299-E18-1\n135200 - F Trench\n299-E17-2\nNew I\nDowngradient\n135000. Hydraulic Gradient Zones (degrees)\nMonitoring Efficiency = 99% L IL\nNew Downg radient Well #2*\n134800 299-E17-25 299-E17-23\n573600. 574000 574400. 574800. GoaiOOse\nFigure 5.8. Sequence for Installation of Downgradient Monitoring Wells at the IDF\n2\n3 Areas in black are areas from which leaks will not be detected with the array of monitoring wells shown.\n4 A. Area used for disposal and associated monitoring wells for construction phase I;\n5 B. Area used for disposal and associated monitoring wells for construction phase II;\n6 C. Area used for disposal and associated monitoring wells for construction phase III.\nChapter 5.30\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTable 5.1. Water Levels in Groundwater Wells in the Vicinity of the IOF Site\nWell Measure date DTW ma WT elev mb Ref elev me\n299-E13-10 03/14/02 101.7 122.5 226.31\n299-E17-12 03/14/02 100.0 121.1 221.09\n299-E17-13 04/12/01 97.7 122.6 220.34\n299-E17-17 04/12/99 97.8 122.8 220.54\n299-E17-18 10/03/02 98.5 122.3 220.76\n299-E17-20 04/09/97 97.1 123.2 220.33\n299-E17-21 04/23/98 100.4 122.7 224.26\n299-E17-22 05/20/02 98.1 122.5 220.59\n299-E17-23 05/20/02 101.6 122.2 223.84\n299-E17-25 05/21/02 98.3 126.7 225.03\n299-E18-1 03/14/02 98.2 122.4 220.65\n299-E18-3 06/27/96 97.8 123.4 221.20\n299-E18-4 06/27/96 97.7 123.4 221.05\n299-E19-1 03/22/88 100.4 124.9 225.26\n299-E23-1 03/14/02 96.0 122.4 218.39\n299-E23-2 12/20/94 97.2 123.5 220.77\n299-E24-4 08/10/98 90.6 122.9 213.47\n299-E24-7 06/11/97 96.2 123.2 219.34\n299-E24-16 10/04/02 97.7 122.3 220.02\n299-E24-17 04/07/97 97.36 122.9 220.16\n299-E24-18 10/02/02 98.0 122.3 220.35\n299-E24-21 03/22/01 95.4 122.6 217.85\n1 a DTW = depth to water\n2 b WT elev = elevation of water table (meters above mean sea level)\n3 Ref elev = reference elevation (meters above mean sea level, North American Vertical Datum 88 reference),\n4 generally top of well casing.\n5\n6 Table 5.2. Monitored Constituents for the IDF\nIndicator parameters Supplemental constituents\nChromium (filtered) Alkalinity\nSpecific conductance (field) Anions\nTotal organic carbon ICP metals\nTotal organic halides Turbidity (field)\npH (field)\n7\nChapter 5.31\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTable 5.3. Expected Behavior of Selected Regulated Constituents/Materials for the IOF\nConstituentimaterial Expected Expected Commentscharged state (Kd)\nOrganics\nAcetonitrile N/A High (0.16) Miscible with water (Howard Volume IV,\n1993)\nCarbon tetrachloride N/A High (0.60); 0.29 Moderately soluble in water (805 mg/L)\n(DOE/RL-93-99) (Howard, Volume 11,1990)\nCreosote2 N/A High (0.03 to 0.06)3 Relatively low solubility in water.\nNaphthalene solubility in water (31.7 mg/L\n[Howard, Volume 1, 1989]). Anthracene\nsolubility in water (0.03 to\n0.5 mg/L[Mackay et al, Volume II, 1992])\nDioxane N/A High (0.01) Miscible with water (Howard, Volume II,\n1990)\nEthylene glycol N/A Unknown4 Miscible with water (Howard, Volume II,\n1990)\nNaphthalene Moderate (4 to 10); 1.4 Sparingly soluble in water (31.7 mg/L\n(DOE/RL-93-99) [Howard, Volume I, 1989]).\nPolychlorinated N/A Low (20 to 100); 440 to Low solubility in water. 0.01 to 1 mg/L as\nbiphenyls 2,300 (DOE/RL-93-99) Aloclors (Mackay et al. 1992); 0.27 to 1.45\nmg/L (WHC-SD-EN-TI-201)\nTetrachloroethylene N/A High (2.1); 0.22 Moderately soluble in water (1,503 mg/L)\n(DOE/RL-93 -99) (Howard, Volume II, 1990)\nToluene N/A High (0.37 to 1.8); 0.18 Moderately soluble in water (535 mg/L)\n(DOE/RL-93 -99) (Howard, Volume II, 1990)\nTrichloroethylene N/A High (1.0); 0.1 to 1.0 Moderately soluble in water (1,100 mg/L)\n(WHC-SC-EN-TI-20 1); (Howard, Volume II, 1990)\n0.11 (DOE/RL-93-99)\nVinyl chloride N/A High (0.004); 0.056 Moderately soluble in water (2,763 mg/L)\n(DOE/RL-93-99) (Howard, Volume I, 1989)\nInorganics\nAntimony Cation (Sb+2) Moderate (0 to 40, best Moderately soluble (best estimate):\nestimate: 20 1,000 mg/L (DOE/RL-93-99)\n[DOE/RL-93 -99])\nArsenic Anion (AsO4-5 ) High, 0 Moderately soluble (best estimate):\n(DOE/RL-93 -99) 1,000 mg/L (DOE/RL-93-99)\nBarium Cation (Ba+2) Moderate, 20 to 200, Low solubility (best estimate): I mg/L\nbest estimate: 50 (DOE/RL-93-99)\n(DOE/RL-93-99)\nBeryllium Cation (Be+2) Moderate, 15 to 200, Solubility unknown. Best estimate: I mg/L\nbest estimate: 20\n(DOE/RL-93-99)\nCadmium Cation (Cd2) Moderate, 15 to 30, best Sparingly soluble. Best estimate: 25 mg/L\nestimate: 23 (DOE/RL-93-99)\n(DOE/RL-93-99)\nChromium Anion (CrO4-2) High (0.0 to 1.02 Low solubility: 0.5 to 10 mg/L\n[PNNL-13895); 0.001 (WHC-SC-EN-TI-201)\n(WHC-SC-EN-TI-201)\nLead Cation (Pb+2) Low (1,330 to 469,000 Low solubility: 287 pg/L in Hanford Site\n[PNNL-13895]) groundwater (PNL-979 1)\nMercury Cation (Hg+2) Moderate, best estimate: Solubility unknown. Best estimate: 1 mg/L\n30 (DOE/RL-93-99) (DOE/RL-93-99)\nNickel Cation (Ni+2) Low (48 to 337 Low solubility: 1.9 mg/L in Hanford Site\nNi (OH)2 [PNNL-13895) groundwater (PNL-9791)\n1 NiCO3\nChapter 5.32\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTable 5.3. Expected Behavior of Selected Regulated Constituents/Materials for the IDF\nConstituent/material Expected Expected mobility' Commentscharged state (Kd)\nSelenium Anion (SeO4-6) High (3 to 10 Moderately soluble. Best estimate:\nrPNNL-138951) 1,000 mg/L (DOE/RL-93-99)\n(3 to 8 PNNL-1 1966)\nSilver Cation (Ag') Moderate, 20 to 30, best Sparingly soluble (best estimate): 25 mg/L\nestimate: 25 (DOE/RL-93-99).\n(DOE/RL-93-99)\n1 N/A = Not applicable\n2 1 Unless cited in the column, Kd (partition coefficient) values were calculated from Koc (normalized sorption coefficient) values\n3 obtained from either the Handbook of Environmental Fate and Exposure Data for Organic Chemicals series (Volumes I-IV) (P.H.\n4 Howard, ed) or the Illustrated Handbook of Physical-Chemical Properties and Environmental Fate for Organic Chemicals series\n5 [Mackay et al. 1992a, 1992b]. For all organics (except carbon tetrachloride), the calculation assumes an organic carbon content\n6 for Hanford Site soil of 1.0%. The value of organic carbon assumed is conservative recognizing that the organic carbon content\n7 of most Hanford Site soil falls considerably below this value. However, applying this level of conservatism also recognizes that\n8 mineral-driven sorption likely plays a role in organic constituent mobility for Hanford Site soils with organic carbon content at or\n9 below 0.1% (PNNL-13560). A calculation of a Kd value using acetonitrile as an example is as follows. The literature estimated\n10 value of Koc for acetonitrile is 16 (Howard 1993).\n11 Kd = c X Koc where foc= the mass fraction of organic carbon in the soil.\n12 Kd (acetonitrile) = 0.01 X 16 = 0.16.\n13 2 Creosote is a coal tar distillate containing high quantities of naphthalene and anthracene (Lewis, R.J., Sr. 1993).\n14 ' Because creosote is predominately a mixture of naphthalene and anthracene (footnote 2), assumed Koc values for naphthalene\n15 (Howard 1989) and anthracene (Mackay et al., Volume II) in calculating a Kd range for creosote.\n16 4 This constituent has a low octanol/water partition coefficient indicating that its adsorption to soil would be low (Howard,\n17 Volume II, 1990)\n18\nChapter 5.33\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTable 5.4. Analytical Methods and Method Detection Limits for Regulated Constituents\nand Indicator Parameters\nMethod Detection Limit 3\nClass of Compounds Analytical Methods I (ug/L)\nTrace Metals:\nSW 846, Method 6010 or 0.18-44.82\nSW 846, Method 6020 or 0.042-8.5\nEPA/600/R-94/1 11, Method 200.8 .05-50\nArsenic:\nSW 846, Method 6010 or 50\nSW 846, Method 6020 or 2\nEPA/600/R-94/1 11, Method 200.8 0.40\nCadmium:\nSW 846, Method 6010 or 4\nSW 846, Method 6020 or 0.86-2.3\nEPA/600/R-94/1 11, Method 200.8 0.10\nChromium:\nSW 846, Method 6010 or 4\nSW 846, Method 6020 or 1.9-3.1\nEPA/600/R-94/1 11, Method 200.8 0.5\nMetals Lead:\nSW 846, Method 6010 or 27\nSW 846, Method 6020 or 0.49\nEPA/600/R-94/1 11, Method 200.8 0.10\nMercury:\nSW 846, Method 6020 or .093\nSW 846 Method 7470 or 0.1\nEPA/600/R-94/1 11, Method 200.8 0.05\nSelenium:\nSW 846, Method 6010 or 30\nSW 846, Method 6020 or 1\nEPA/600/R-94/1 11, Method 200.8 0.30\nThallium:\nSW 846, Method 6010 or 32\nSW 846, Method 6020 or 0.6\nEPA/600/R-94/1 11, Method 200.8 0.10\nSW 846, Method 8041 or Not available\nSemi-Volatile Organics SW 846, Method 8040 2.0-3.72\nSW 846, Method 8270 0.24 -502\nPesticides/Polychlorinated SW 846, Method 8081 (Pesticides) 0.0034 -1.92\nBiphenyls SW 846, Method 8082 (PCBs) 0.14-0.492\nHerbicides SW 846, Method 8151 .085-842\nVolatile Organic\nCompounds SW 846, Method 8260 (VOAs) .04-1002\nDioxins SW 846, Method 8290 .00000067-.0000052\nGeneral Chemistry Cyanide:\nSW 846, Method 9012 or 2.0-2.4\nStandard Methods 4500-CN or 4\n600/4-79-020, Method 335.2 4\nSulfide:\nSW 846, Method 9030 180-7302\nChapter 5.34\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTable 5.4. Analytical Methods and Method Detection Limits for Regulated Constituents\nand Indicator Parameters\nMethod Detection Limit 3\nClass of Compounds Analytical Methods 1 (ug/L)\nEPA-600/4-79-020, Method 310.1 & 310.2,\nAlkalinity Standard Methods 2320 850 -25004\nAnions EPA-600/R-93-100, Method 300.0 5.1-44302\npH Company specific Not applicable\nSpecific conductance EPA-600/R-93-100, Method 120.1 Not applicable\n1 Changes to the Analytical Methods require prior approval per WAC 173-303-830, Appendix I, C.2.\n2 2 Detection limit varies according to specific compound. The range of method detection limits for all compounds detected by\n3 the specific analytical method is given.\n4 3 Method detection limits are based on historical values reported by the analytical laboratories, where available. MDLs may\n5 vary by laboratory and are updated periodically.\n6 4 This MDL is based on Method 310.1, which was used previously. No technical difference is found between Method 310.1\n7 and SM 2320, except the SM covers more information on the principles of the method.\n8 5.6 REFERENCES\n9 Public Laws\n10 42 USC 2011 et seq. (1954). Atomic Energy Act of 1954. As amended, Ch. 1073, 68 Stat.919; available\n11 online at http://www.nrc.zov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/staff/sr0980/vI/srO980v1.pdf\n12 42 USC 6901 et seq. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ofl976, as amended, Public Law 94-580,\n13 90 Stat. 2795; available online at http://www.epa.gov/lawsregs/laws/rcra.html\n14 Code of Federal Regulations\n15 40 CFR 136.3 (5.5.4.1) Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 136. Whole Effluent Toxicity:\n16 Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for Chemical Analysis of Pollutants.\n17 40 CFR 264, Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 264, Subpart F. Standards for Owners of\n18 Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.\n19 Washington Administrative Code\n20 WAC 173-303-645, Washington Administrative Code. Releases from Regulated Units. Olympia,\n21 Washington.\n22 Others\n23 ASTM. (1986). Annual Book ofASTM Standards. American Society for Testing and Materials, West\n24 Conshohocken, Pennsylvania; available for purchase at http://www.astm.ore/bookstore/bos\n25 BHI-0 1103. (1999). Clastic Injection Dikes of the Pasco Basin and Vicinity, Rev. 0, Fecht, K.R., Bechtel\n26 Hanford, Inc., Richland, Washington.\n27 BNWL. (1974). BNWL-B-360. Selected Water Table Contour Maps and Well Hydrographs for the\n28 Hanford Reservation, 1944 -1973. Kipp, K.L. and Mudd, R.D., Pacific Northwest Laboratories,\n29 Richland, Washington.\n30 DOE. (1988). DOE/RW-0 164. Repository Location, Hanford Site, Washington, Vols. 1,23,4,5,6,7,8,9,\n31 U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management, Washington, D.C.\n32 DOE-RL. (1993). DOE/RL-92-04, Revision 0 (Sections 1 of 2, 2 of 2). PUREXSource Aggregate Area\n33 Management Study Report. U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations, Richland,\n34 Washington.\n35 DOE-RL. (1994). DOE/RL-93-99. Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study Report for the\n36 Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland, Washington.\nChapter 5.35\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Domenico, P. A. and G. A. Robbins. (1985). A New Method of Contaminant Plume Analysis.\n2 Groundwater, Vol. 23, No. 4.\n3 EPA. (1979). Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes. EPA-600/4-79-020, as revised,\n4 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.\n5 EPA. (1986). SW-846. Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Wastes: Physical/Chemical Methods,\n6 3rd Edition, as amended. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and\n7 Emergency Response, Washington, D.C.\n8 EPA. (2006). EPA QA/G-4. Guidance on Systematic Planning Using the Data Quality Objectives\n9 Process, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information,\n10 Washington, D.C.\n11 Garber, M. S. and Koopman, F. C. (1968). Methods ofMeasuring Water Levels in Deep Well:\n12 US. Geological Survey. TRWI, Book 8, Chapter A-1. U. S. Government Printing Office,\n13 Washington, D. C.\n14 Gibbons, R. D. (1994). Statistical Methods for Groundwater Monitorin .John Wiley & Sons,\n15 New York.\n16 Gilbert, R. 0. (1987). Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring, Van Nostrand\n17 Reinhold, New York.\n18 HNF. (1999). HNF-4921, Rev. 0. Immobilized Low Activity Tank Waste Inventory Data Package.\n19 Wootan, D. W., Fluor Daniel Northwest, Inc., Richland, Washington.\n20 Howard, P.H., Ed. (1989). Handbook of Environmental Fate and Exposure Data for Organic\n21 Chemicals: Volume I, Large Production and Priority Pollutants. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI.\n22 Howard, P.H., Ed. (1990) Handbook ofEnvironmental Fate and Exposure Data for Organic Chemicals:\n23 VolumeII Solvents 2. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI.\n24 Howard, P.H., Ed. (1993). Handbook ofEnvironmental Fate and Exposure Data for Organic\n25 Chemicals: Volume IV, Solvents and Chemical Intermediates. P.H. Howard, ed. Lewis Publishers,\n26 Ann Arbor, MI.\n27 Lindsey, K.A. (1996). The Miocene to Pliocene Ringold Formation and Associated Deposits of the\n28 Ancestral Columbia River System, South-central Washington and North-central Oregon. Open File\n29 Report 96-8, Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Division of Geology and Earth\n30 Resources, Olympia, Washington.\n31 Mackay, D., Shiu, W.Y., and Ma, K.C. (1992). Illustrated Handbook ofPhysical-Chemical Properties\n32 and Environmental Fate for Organic Chemicals, Volume 1: Monoaromatic Hydrocarbons,\n33 Chlorobenzenes, and PCB's. Lewis Publishers, Ann Arbor, MI.\n34 Mackay, D., Shiu, W.Y., and Ma, K.C. (1992). Illustrated Handbook of Physical-Chemical Properties\n35 and Environmental Fate for Organic Chemicals, Volume 11: Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons,\n36 Polychlorinated Dioxins, and Dibenzofurans. Lewis Publishers, Ann Arbor, MI.\n37 PNL. (1992). PNL-9791. Estimation of the Release and Migration ofNickel Through Soils and\n38 Groundwater at the Hanford Site 218-E-12B Burial Ground. Rhoads, K., Bjornstad, B.N.,\n39 Lewis, R.E., Teel, S.S., Cantrell, R.J., Serne, L.H., Smoot, J.L, Kincaid, C.T., and Wurstner, S.K.,\n40 Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington.\n41 PNNL. (1998). PNNL-1 1957. Immobilized Low-Activity Waste Site Borehole 299-E17-21. Reidel, S.P.,\n42 Reynolds, K.D., and Horton, D.G. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.\n43 PNNL. (1999). PNNL-12257, Rev. 1. Geologic Data Package for 2001 Immobilized Low-Activity\n44 Waste Performance Assessment, Reidel, S.P. and Horton, D.G., Pacific Northwest National\n45 Laboratory, Richland, Washington.\nChapter 5.36\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 PNNL. (2000). PNNL-12261. Hydrogeology for the SuprabasaltAquifer System, 200-East Area and\n2 Vicinity, Hanford Site, Washington. Williams, B.A., Bjornstad, B.N., Schalla, R., and Webber, W.D.\n3 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.\n4 PNNL. (2000). PNNL-13400. Groundwater Flow and Transport Calculations Supporting the\n5 Immobilized Low-Activity Waste disposal Facility Performance Assessment. Bergeron, M.P. and\n6 Wurstner, S.K., Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.\n7 PNNL. (2000). PNNL-13404, Sections 1 of 2, 2 of 2. Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring for Fiscal\n8 Year 2009. Hartman, M.J., Morasch, L.F., Webber, W.D., Pacific Northwest National Laboratory,\n9 Richland, Washington.\n10 PNNL. (2001). PNNL-13560. Assessment of Carbon Tetrachloride Groundwater Transport in Support\n11 of the Hanford Carbon Tetrachloride Innovative Technology Demonstration Program. Truex, M.J.,\n12 Murray, C.J., Cole, C.R., Cameron, R.J., Johnson, M.D., Skeen, R.S., and Johnson, C.D. Pacific\n13 Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.\n14 PNNL. (2001). PNNL-13652. Geologic and Wireline Borehole Summary from the Second ILAW\n15 Borehole (299-W24-21). Reidel, S.P., Horton, D.G., and Valenta, M.M. Pacific Northwest National\n16 Laboratory, Richland, Washington.\n17 PNNL. (2002). PNNL-13895. Hanford Contaminant Distribution Coefficient Database and User's\n18 Guide. Cantrell, K.J., Serne, R.J. and Last, G.V., Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland,\n19 Washington.\n20 PNNL. (2002). PNNL-14029. Geologic and Wireline Summaries from Fiscal Year 2002 ILAW\n21 Boreholes. Reidel, S.P., and Ho, A.M., Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland,\n22 Washington.\n23 PNNL. (2003). PNNL-14187, Sections 1 of 2, 2 of 2. Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring for Fiscal\n24 Year 2002. Hartman, M.J., Morasch, L.F., and Webber, W.D., Pacific Northwest National\n25 Laboratory, Richland, Washington.\n26 Reidel, S. P. and Fecht, K. R. (1994). Geologic Map of the Richland 1:100,000 Quadrangle,\n27 Washington. Washington Division of Geology and Earth Resources Open File Report 94-8.\n28 Washington State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington.\n29 RHO. (1981). RHO-BWI-ST-14. Chapter 3, Wanapum and Saddle Mountains Basalts of the Cold Creek\n30 Syncline Area. Reidel, S.P., and Fecht, K.R. In, Subsurface Geology of the Cold Creek Syncline.\n31 Myers, C.W. and S.M. Price, editors, Rockwell Hanford Operations, Richland, Washington.\n32 RPP-6877. (2004). Integrated Disposal Facility Preoperational Monitoring Plan, Rev. 1, Horton, D.F.,\n33 Reidel, S.P., and Chien, Yi-Ju, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory for Bechtel Hanford, Inc.,\n34 Richland, Washington.\n35 U. S. Geological Survey. (1977). National Handbook ofRecommended Methods for Water Data\n36 Acquisition. Office of Water Data Coordination, Reston, Virginia. Available at\n37 http://pubs.usgs.gov/chapterl1\n38 WHC. (1989). WHC-MR-0008. Low-Level Burial Grounds Database. Poremba, B.E., Westinghouse\n39 Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.\n40 WHC. (1992). WHC-MR-0391. (1992). Field Trip Guide to the Hanford Site. Reidel, S.P., Lindsey,\n41 K.A., and Fecht, K.R., Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.\n42 WHC. (1993). WHC-SD-EN-TI-201. Screening Performance Assessment/Risk Assessment for the\n43 Proposed Environment Restoration Disposal Facility (ERDF), Westinghouse Hanford Company,\n44 Richland, Washington.\nChapter 5.37\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 WHC. (1999). WHC-SD-EN-AP-015. Revised Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the 200 Areas Low-\n2 Level Burial Grounds, Last, G.V. and Bjornstad, B.N., Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland,\n3 Washington.\n4 Grubbs, F.E. (February 1969). Procedures for Detecting Outlying Observations in Samples,\n5 Technometrics, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 1-21.\n6 Ostle B., Malone L.C. (1988). Statistics in Research: Basic Concepts and Techniques for Research\n7 Workers. 4th ed, Iowa State Press, ISBN 081381569X\n8 Wilson, C. R., Einberger, C. M., Jackson, R. L., and Mercer, R. B. (1992). Design of Ground- Water\n9 Monitoring Networks Using the Monitoring Efficiency Model (MEMO). Ground Water, Vol. 30,\n10 pp. 965 -970.\n11 Zar, Jerrold, H. (1999). BiostatisticalAnalysis, Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey, pp. 360 -388,\n12 ISBN: 0131008463.\nChapter 5.38\n I\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nCHAPTER 6.0\nPROCEDURES TO PREVENT HAZARDS\nChapter 6.i\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nChapter 6.ii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 CHAPTER 6.0\n2 PROCEDURES TO PREVENT HAZARDS\n3\n4\n5 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n6 6.0 PROCEDURES TO PREVENT HAZARDS.................................6.5\n7 6.1 Security .......................................................... 6.5\n8 6.1.1 Security Procedures and Equipment........................................6.5\n9 6.1.1.1 24-Hour Surveillance System...........................................6.5\n10 6.1.1.2 Barrier and Means to Control Entry...................... ................. 6.5\n11 6.1.1.3 Warning Signs.......................................................6.5\n12 6.1.2 Waiver..... ..................................................... 6.5\n13 6.2 Inspection Plan......................................................6.5\n14 6.2.1 General Inspection Requirements.........................................6.5\n15 6.2.1.1 Types of Problems....................................................6.6\n16 6.2.1.2 Frequency of Inspections..............................................6.6\n17 6.2.2 Schedule for Remedial Action for Problems Revealed...........................6.7\n18 6.2.3 Specific Process or Waste Type Inspection Requirements........................6.7\n19 6.2.3.1 Container Inspection.................................................6.7\n20 6.2.3.2 Landfill Inspection..................................................6.8\n21 6.3 Preparedness and Prevention Requirements................... ............... 6.9\n22 6.3.1 Pre-Active Life Preparedness and Prevention.................................6.9\n23 6.3.2 Equipment Requirements..............................................6.9\n24 6.3.3 Internal Communication...............................................6.9\n25 6.3.4 External Communications..............................................6.9\n26 6.3.5 Emergency Equipment................................................6.9\n27 6.3.6 Water for Fire Control.................................................6.9\n28 6.3.7 Aisle Spacing Requirements for Off-Specification Waste............. ............ 6.9\n29 6.4 Preventive Procedures, Structures, and Equipment........................ .......... 6.10\n30 6.4.1 Unloading Operations...............................................6.10\n31 6.4.2 Runoff...... .................................................... 6.10\n32 6.4.3 Water Supplies....................................................6.10\n33 6.4.4 Equipment and Power Failure.......................... ................ 6.10\n34 6.4.5 Personal Protection Equipment..........................................6.11\n35 6.5 Prevention of Reaction of Ignitable, Reactive, and Incompatible Waste..... ............... 6.11\n36\n37\nChapter 6.iii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 FIGURE\n2 Figure 6.1. Typical Average Daily Action Leakage Rate Calculation................ .......6.12\n3\n4 TABLES\n5 Table 6.1. Container Storage Inspections .............................................. 6.13\n6 Table 6.2. Landfill Inspections during Pre-Active Life*** ....................... ...... 6.13\n7 Table 6.3. Landfill Inspections during Active Life................................... 6.14\n8\nChapter 6.iv\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 6.0 PROCEDURES TO PREVENT HAZARDS\n2 This chapter discusses security, inspection schedules, preparedness and prevention requirements,\n3 preventive procedures, structures, equipment, and prevention of reaction of ignitable, reactive, and\n4 incompatible waste at the Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF). The requirements in this chapter that\n5 address activities involving the receipt and disposal of dangerous waste as defined in WAC 173-303-040\n6 shall be applied during the Active Life of the IDF. Active Life of a facility means the period from the\n7 initial receipt of dangerous waste at the facility until the department receives certification of final closure\n8 (WAC 173-303-040). The requirements of this chapter that do not apply to receipt and disposal of\n9 dangerous waste as defined in WAC 173-303-040, shall be implemented by the Permittees during the\n10 Pre-Active Life of IDF. Pre-Active Life is not defined in the regulations, but refers to the facility\n11 maintenance period between final construction and the start of Active Life.\n12 The IDF is designed and will be operated to minimize exposure of the general public and operating\n13 personnel to disposed waste. Shielding, contamination control, control of toxic or dangerous material,\n14 and safety and security procedures will be used to keep exposure as low as reasonably achievable\n15 (ALARA).\n16 6.1 Security\n17 The following sections describe the security measures, equipment, and warning signs to be used to control\n18 entry to the IDF. A discussion of Hanford Facility security is provided in Attachment 33, Section 6.1.\n19 6.1.1 Security Procedures and Equipment\n20 The following sections describe the 24-hour surveillance system, barrier, and warning signs to be used to\n21 provide security and control access to the IDF.\n22 6.1.1.1 24-Hour Surveillance System\n23 The Hanford Facility is a controlled-access area [refer to Attachment 33, Section 6.1].\n24 6.1.1.2 Barrier and Means to Control Entry\n25 Because the IDF is located within the portion of the Hanford Facility controlled by the 24-hour\n26 surveillance system, WAC 173-303-310(2)(c) does not apply.\n27 6.1.1.3 Warning Signs\n28 Signs will be visible from all angles of approach, and legible from a distance of at least 7.6 meters. Each\n29 active area used for disposal will be posted with a sign, in English, reading, DANGER-UNA UTHORIZED\n30 PERSONNEL KEEP OUT or an equivalent legend.\n31 6.1.2 Waiver\n32 A waiver of the security procedures and equipment requirements for the IDF was not requested.\n33 Therefore, the requirements of WAC 173-303-3 10(1)(a) and (b) are not applicable.\n34 6.2 Inspection Plan\n35 This section describes the method and schedule for inspections of the IDF. These inspections help to\n36 ensure that situations do not exist that might cause or lead to the release of waste to the environment,\n37 degradation of safety equipment and/or systems, or that might pose a threat to human health. Abnormal\n38 conditions identified by inspections must be corrected.\n39 6.2.1 General Inspection Requirements\n40 The content and frequency of inspections are described in this section. Inspection discrepancies are\n41 documented on inspection checklists and log sheets. The schedule and inspection records will be kept in\n42 the inspection logbooks and retained by the IDF operations personnel. Inspection records will be retained\n43 in accordance with Permit Condition 11.1.1 and contain the following information:\nChapter 6.5\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 * Date and time of inspection.\n2 * Printed name and the hand written signature of the inspector.\n3 * Notation of the observations made.\n4 * An account of spills or discharges in accordance with WAC 173-303-145.\n5 * Date and nature of any repairs or remedial actions taken.\n6 The inspection checklists consist of a listing of items that are assessed during each inspection. A yes/no\n7 response will be made for each listed item. A 'yes' response means that the item is in compliance with the\n8 conditions stated on the checklist. Any problems identified during the inspection, as indicated by a 'no'\n9 response on the checklist, will be reported immediately to the IDF operations supervisor.\n10 6.2.1.1 Types of Problems\n11 Types of problems looked for during an inspection in Pre-Active Life are in Table 6.2. Types of\n12 problems looked for during an inspection in Active Life are in Table 6.3. Once the IDF begins to receive\n13 dangerous waste, the requirements in Table 6.2 are no longer applicable. Each day mixed waste\n14 containers and/or bulk waste are handled within the IDF; an operator will perform a daily inspection of\n15 areas subject to spills (e.g., loading and unloading areas and waste handling areas).\n16 6.2.1.2 Frequency of Inspections\n17 Table 6.2 provides inspection frequencies during the Pre-Active Life. Tables 6.1, 6., and 6.3 provide\n18 inspection frequencies during the Active Life. For clarification, areas with operations that may result in\n19 spills are described below\n20 Each step in the waste placement operation occurs in the landfill over the double High Density\n21 Polyethylene (HDPE) liner system that provides containment of any spill from the waste handling\n22 operation.\n23 Waste Handling Operations involve the following:\n24 * Unloading of the waste shipment in the landfill Placement of the cover soil over the waste\n25 container\n26 During Active Life leachate,1 movement occurs within the double-contained leachate handling\n27 system. There is a potential for a leachate spill on the concrete containment slab of the Crest Pad\n28 Building, Leachate Transfer Building, and/or the Leachate Loading Truck Pad.\n29 Leachate Handling Operations involve the following:\n30 * Pumping leachate from the collection sumps to the Crest Pad Building.\n31 * Activities within the Crest Pad Building.\n32 * Transfer of leachate to and from the double-lined Leachate Tanks.\n33 * All activities that occur in the Leachate Transfer Building.\n34 * Pumping of leachate to a tanker truck on the Truck Loading Pad.\n35 Liquid handling operations involve the following:\n36 * The Secondary Leak Detection System (SLDS) is similar to the Leak Detection System (LDS),\n37 except that it is equipped with liquid level indication instrumentation only. A low-capacity\n38 submersible pump can be inserted into the SLDS sump if required. Pumping of liquid from the\n39 collection sump to the small, portable container on the SLDS Pad may be required. Collected\n40 liquid in the SLDS that may be construction water and/or liquid from other sources.\nWAC 173-303-040 defines \"Leachate\" as any liquid, including any components suspended in the liquid that has percolated\nthrough or drained from dangerous waste.\nChapter 6.6\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI (Note that the secondary leak detection system is not a design requirement of WAC 173-303-665,\n2 however United States Department of Energy (DOE) has added the design feature pursuant to its\n3 authority under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (AEA) and not for the purposes of compliance with the\n4 dangerous waste regulations. Therefore, information regarding the design, construction, and operation of\n5 the SLDS is provided for information only. Pursuant to AEA, DOE has sole and exclusive responsibility\n6 and authority to regulate the source, special nuclear and by-product material component of radioactive\n7 mixed waste at DOE-owned nuclear facilities. Source, special nuclear and by-product materials, as\n8 defined by AEA, are not subject to regulation under Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) or\n9 the Hazardous Waste Management Act, by the State of Washington and are not be subject to State\n10 dangerous waste permit, orders, or any other enforceable instrument issued there under. DOE recognizes\n11 that radionuclide data may be useful in the development and confirmation of geohydrologic conceptual\n12 models. Radionuclide data contained herein is therefore provided as a matter of comity so the\n13 information may be used for such purposes).\n14 6.2.2 Schedule for Remedial Action for Problems Revealed\n15 The operating organization will remedy any problems revealed by the inspection on a schedule that\n16 prevents hazards to human health and the environment. Where a hazard is imminent or already has\n17 occurred immediate action will be taken. Immediate actions will be implemented based on ALARA\n18 considerations, availability of supplies, equipment, and personnel.\n19 6.2.3 Specific Process or Waste Type Inspection Requirements\n20 The following sections detail the inspections to be performed at the IDF.\n21 6.2.3.1 Container Inspection\n22 On receipt, operations personnel will confirm appropriate documentation by inspecting each mixed\n23 wasted container for disposal and compliance with the container receipt inspection criteria (Chapter 3.0)\n24 before the mixed waste is placed in the IDF.\n25 If present, off-specification waste and vitrified waste requiring cooling in storage will be subject to the\n26 specific items and/or problems noted during weekly container inspection (Table 6.1) include the\n27 following:\n28 * Condition of trench floor and sides.\n29 * Container structural integrity.\n30 * Containers closed.\n31 * At a minimum, 76.2 centimeters aisle spacing.\n32 * Corrosion of containers.\n33 * Evidence of spills or leaks.\n34 * Container labels and markings in place, legible, and unobscured.\n35 * Areas in and around stored waste are free of combustibles (e.g., tumbleweeds).\n36 * Waste separations such as tape, rope, chain or other cordon mechanism are intact.\n37 If present, transport vehicles containing off specification waste or vitrified waste requiring cooling will be\n38 subject to the specific items and/or problems noted during weekly inspection include the following:\n39 * Transport vehicle structural integrity.\n40 * At a minimum, 76.2 centimeters aisle spacing between transporters.\n41 * Evidence of spills or leaks.\n42 * Areas in and around transport vehicles are free of combustibles (e.g. tumbleweeds).\n43 * Separations such as tape, rope, chain or other cordon mechanism are intact.\nChapter 6.7\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nI Transport vehicles will not be subject to an individual container inspection within the transporter.\n2 Records of inspection will be maintained as detailed in Section 6.2.1.\n3 6.2.3.2 Landfill Inspection\n4 The IDF will be inspected according to the frequencies in Table 6.2 during Pre-Active Life and in\n5 accordance with Table 6.3 during Active Life.\n6 6.2.3.2.1 Run-on and Runoff Control System\n7 A run-on control system is installed around the perimeter of each lined trench (Chapter 4.0). The system\n8 consists of a berm along the outer margin of each trench that prevents run-on from entering the trench.\n9 All run-on control system berms are inspected quarterly (Table 6.2) and after storms for signs of\n10 deterioration, malfunction, or improper operation. During Active Life, any precipitation that falls\n11 between the run-on control berm and the edge of the trench excavation eventually might flow into the\n12 primary leachate control and removal system sump and will be treated as leachate.\n13 6.2.3.2.2 Leak Detection System\n14 During pre-active life, the leak detection system will be monitored quarterly and after storms (Table 6.2)\n15 for the amount of liquid removed. To calculate the action leakage rate, measurements are needed to be\n16 collected over five consecutive days each quarter. The action leakage rate will be determined for the\n17 quarter using these measurements collected during one five day work week each quarter.\n18 During Active life (Table 6.3), leak detection for lined trench at the IDF is accomplished by the\n19 following:\n20 * Monitoring liquid level above the secondary liner.\n21 * Monitoring liquid levels above primary liner.\n22 * Inspecting for the presence of liquids after significant precipitation events.\n23 * Verifying certain gauges and instruments are in current calibration; calibration is performed\n24 annually or more frequently at intervals suggested by the manufacturer (Chapter 4.0,\n25 Section 4.3.7.4).\n26 * Recording secondary sump levels on a daily action leakage rate calculation sheet (Figure 6.1).\n27 If the action leakage rate (Chapter 4.0, Appendix 4C) has not been exceeded, the liner system will be\n28 functioning properly.\n29 6.2.3.2.3 Wind Dispersal Control System\n30 During pre-active life, berms will be inspected quarterly and after storms to ensure the berms are\n31 functioning properly (Table 6.2).\n32 During active life (Table 6.3), waste is inspected on receipt for evidence of damage, corrosion, or\n33 deterioration that might lead to dispersal of the contents.\n34 Unpackaged or bulk waste with any potential for wind dispersal is covered or sprayed with fixative after\n35 being placed in a trench.\n36 In addition, unpackaged or bulk waste handling operations are suspended in winds exceeding\n37 24 kilometers per hour unless specifically approved by operations supervisors. The supervisor only\n38 would grant approval to operate in winds over 24 kilometers per hour after determining that the risk to\n39 human health or the environment would be diminished by completing the work activity, or that the nature\n40 and form of the waste handling activity was such that the wind speed would have no significant impact.\n41 6.2.3.2.4 Leachate Collection and Removal System\n42 During pre-active life, the Leachate Collection and Removal System is inspected quarterly and after\n43 storms (Table 6.2) for the presence of liquids, and that the system is functioning properly.\nChapter 6.8\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 During active-life (Table 6.3), Liquids in the Leachate Collection and Removal System and Leak\n2 Detection System are monitored daily to ensure the action leakage rate (Chapter 4.0, Appendix 4A) is not\n3 exceeded and will be inspected per Table 6.2. In addition, a flow meter is used to check if the amount of\n4 actual leachate pumped corresponds to the amount accumulated in the leachate collection tank. This\n5 check will verify the proper function of the leachate collection and removal sump pumps with each use.\n6 6.3 Preparedness and Prevention Requirements\n7 Section 6.3.1 describes the preparedness and prevention measures to be implemented during Pre-Active\n8 Life. Sections 6.3.2 through 6.3.7 describe the preparedness and prevention measures taken at the IDF\n9 during Active Life.\n10 6.3.1 Pre-Active Life Preparedness and Prevention\n11 During Pre-Active Life, the Permittees will comply with Permit Attachment 4, Hanford Emergency\n12 Management Plan (DOE/RL-94-02) as applicable for a facility that does not contain dangerous waste. An\n13 emergency coordinator will be assigned to IDF who will manage and control all aspects of the initial\n14 facility response when an emergency occurs.\n15 6.3.2 Equipment Requirements\n16 The following sections describe the internal and external communications systems and the emergency\n17 equipment required.\n18 6.3.3 Internal Communication\n19 There is one building, MO-518, equipped to support communications. Immediate emergency instruction\n20 to personnel working at the IDF will be provided by cellular telephones.\n21 6.3.4 External Communications\n22 Personnel at the IDF will have voice communication or equivalent (e.g., hand signals) during work\n23 assignments to maintain external communications with shift supervisors. Supervision will contact the\n24 Hanford Facility emergency telephone number (911) (373-3800 for cellular telephones) if assistance is\n25 needed in the field.\n26 6.3.5 Emergency Equipment\n27 Emergency equipment will be available for use at the IDF. A list of equipment is included in the\n28 contingency plan (Addendum J. 1, Pre-Active Life, and Addendum J.2, Active Life).\n29 The Hanford Facility relies primarily on the Hanford Fire Department to control fires. Emergency\n30 equipment will not be located at IDF trenches. Portable fire extinguishers will be carried on IDF\n31 operations vehicles. Attachment 4, Hanford Emergency Management Plan, (DOE/RL-94-02) identifies\n32 the trained firefighting and emergency medical personnel and equipment.\n33 6.3.6 Water for Fire Control\n34 * Hanford Fire Department trucks as described in Permit Attachment 4, Hanford Emergency\n35 Management Plan, (DOE/RL-94-02); and fire hydrants described in Addendum J.1 and\n36 Addendum J.2 supply water for fire control at the IDF.\n37 6.3.7 Aisle Spacing Requirements for Off-Specification Waste\n38 Aisle spacing during off-specification and cooling vitrified waste storage operations is sufficient to allow\n39 the movement of personnel and fire protection equipment in and around the containers. This aisle spacing\n40 meets the requirements of WAC 173-303-340(3). Inspection aisle space must be at least 76.2 centimeters.\n41 During off-specification storage operations, rows of containers are placed no more than two containers\n42 wide in accordance with WAC 173-303-630(5)(c). Aisle spacing requirements will be applied to\n43 transport vehicles but not to the waste within the transport vehicles.\nChapter 6.9\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 6.4 Preventive Procedures, Structures, and Equipment\n2 The following sections will apply during the Active Life for the IDF and describe preventive procedures,\n3 structures, and equipment.\n4 6.4.1 Unloading Operations\n5 Methods used to prevent release of waste during unloading operations will be employed as follows.\n6 * Waste will be inspected according to the receipt inspection criteria (Chapter 3.0).\n7 o If waste fails the inspection, it will be designated as an off-specification waste and could be\n8 placed in the storage area or returned to the generator.\n9 * Containers and bulk waste will be handled by appropriate equipment (i.e., crane) during\n10 unloading.\n11 * Path from loading area to trench area will be clear of obstructions.\n12 Spills will be managed as identified in the contingency plan (Addendum J.2).\n13 Containers and bulk waste will be staged at the waste unloading area no longer than necessary for\n14 placement into the landfill. Administrative procedures may prevent immediate unloading and backfilling\n15 of waste containers. Containers might be left in the transporters as needed to resolve the administrative\n16 procedure requirements or to support the operational schedule before containers are placed into the\n17 landfill. The transfer vehicle containing vitrified waste requiring cooling may be temporarily placed in\n18 the storage area prior to unloading for disposal.\n19 6.4.2 Runoff\n20 The waste in the IDF will be placed below the land surface; thus, the IDF is designed to prevent run-off of\n21 precipitation that might have come in contact with the waste. The land surface is relatively level, so\n22 trenches have only internal drainage. The minimal amounts of precipitation that accumulate are\n23 contained within the trench.\n24 The IDF trench is designed to channel run-on liquid away from the trench. Precipitation that percolates to\n25 the bottom of the trench is captured in the leachate collection system and is managed as rainwater during\n26 Pre Active Life. During Active Life, these liquids will be managed as multi-source leachate waste.\n27 6.4.3 Water Supplies\n28 The design and operation of the IDF during Active Life is intended to minimize the generation of\n29 potentially contaminated leachate and to prevent leachate migration into groundwater resources in the\n30 local area. All activities performed during Active Life (Chapter 4.0) or Pre-active Life is designed to\n31 protect local water supplies.\n32 Activities that prevent contamination of water supplies or groundwater will include the following:\n33 * Placement of waste in lined trenches\n34 o Run-on and run-off will be controlled\n35 o Leak detection systems will be used\n36 o Leachate will be collected and managed as waste\n37 o Inspections will be performed\n38 * Placement of backfill will occur after a layer of waste has been placed in the trench.\n39 6.4.4 Equipment and Power Failure\n40 Electrical power is required for the landfill. Electricity supplies power to the sump pumps used to remove\n41 accumulated leachate from the primary and secondary liners. Electricity outages will be restored as soon\n42 as possible. Backup equipment will be acquired if necessary to provide electrical service. Failed\n43 equipment will be repaired or replaced as soon as possible.\nChapter 6.10\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 6.4.5 Personal Protection Equipment\n2 Personnel will be trained in the use of applicable personal protection equipment. The protective clothing\n3 required for Active Life will vary depending on the form and content of the waste.\n4 6.5 Prevention of Reaction of Ignitable, Reactive, and Incompatible Waste\n5 The waste acceptance criteria will prohibit the disposal of ignitable, reactive, and incompatible waste at\n6 the IDF. Waste acceptance criteria (Chapter 3.0) will ensure that the required treatment has been\n7 performed before the waste is disposed in the IDF.\n8 Waste stream compatibility (i.e., compatibility between individual waste streams and compatibility\n9 between waste streams and landfill design and construction parameters) will be assessed on a case-by-\n10 case basis. Criteria for assessing and determining compatibility will be identified in either the facility\n11 Waste Acceptance Criteria, Waste Analysis Plan, or other protocol or procedure as appropriate\n12 (Chapter 3.0) for further discussion of waste stream compatibility.\n13\nChapter 6.11\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nAVERAGE DAILY ACTION LEAKAGE RATE CALCULATION\nOperating Day / / Gallons\nOperating Day / / Gallons\nOperating Day / / Gallons\nOperating Day / / Gallons\nOperating Day / / Gallons\nOperating Day / / Gallons\nOperating Day / / Gallons\nSecondary Sump Total Volume TOTAL _ Gallons\n(DIVIDE TOTAL VOLUME BY 7)\nAVERAGE DAILY ACTION LEAKAGE RATE: Gallons\nNOTIFY IDF Operations Supervisor if Average Daily Action Leakage Rate is GREATER than XXX\nGallons\nRepairs or remedial action taken:\nOperator's Printed Name: Date\nOperator's Signature: Time hrs\nOperations Supervisor Printed Name: Date\nOperations Supervisor Signature: Time hrs\n2 Figure 6.1. Typical Average Daily Action Leakage Rate Calculation\nChapter 6.12\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 Table 6.1. Container Storage Inspections\nRequirement Description Inspection Frequency Types Of Problems\n-630(6) Weekly Leaking Containers\nContainers Deteriorating containers\n-630(6) Weekly Deteriorating containment system\nContainment System\n-395(1)(d) Not Applicable Not Applicable\nIgnitable or reactive waste\n2 Table 6.2. Landfill Inspections during Pre-Active Life**\nRequirement Description Inspection Frequency Types Of Problems\n-665(4)(b)(i) Quarterly and after storms* Deterioration, malfunction, or\nRun-on and run-off control improper operation\n-665(4)(b)(ii) Quarterly and after storms* Proper functioning\nWind dispersal control systems\n-665(4)(b)(iii) Quarterly and after storms* Presence of liquids; proper\nLeachate collection and removal functioning\nsystems\n-665(4)(c)(i) Quarterly and after storms* Amount of liquids removed\nLeak detection system sump\nSecondary leak detection system Quarterly ** Presence of unexpected liquid\nsump** volume**\nSecurity Quarterly Signs are posted and legible\n\"Danger unauthorized personnel\nkeep out\" signs\nAreas subject to spills Daily when any activities may take place Evidence of spills\nthat have a potential for a spill or release\nto occur\n3 *A storm is any atmospheric disturbance with either wind gust of 56.3 kilometers per hour (35 miles per hour) or greater, or\n4 precipitation of 0.5 inch or greater within a 24-hour period.\n5 **Note: Secondary leak detection system is not a design requirement of WAC 173-303-665, however DOE is adding the design\n6 feature pursuant to its authority under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (AEA) and not for the purposes of compliance with the\n7 dangerous waste regulations. Therefore, formation regarding the design, construction, and operation of the secondary leak\n8 detection system is provided for information only. Pursuant to AEA, DOE has sole and exclusive responsibility and authority\n9 to regulate the source, special nuclear and by-product material component of radioactive mixed waste at DOE-owned nuclear\n10 facilities. Source, special nuclear and by-product materials, as defined by AEA, are not subject to regulation under RCRA or\n11 the Hazardous Waste Management Act, by the State of Washington and are not be subject to State dangerous waste permit,\n12 orders, or any other enforceable instrument issued there under. DOE recognizes that radionuclide data may be useful in the\n13 development and confirmation of geohydrologic conceptual models. Radionuclide data contained herein is therefore\n14 provided as a matter of comity so the information may be used for such purposes.*** Once the IDF begins to receive\n15 dangerous waste, the requirements in Table 6.2 are no longer applicable, and inspection requirements will be as provided in\n16 Table 6.3\n17\nChapter 6.13\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nTable 6.3. Landfill Inspections during Active Life\nRequirement Description Inspection Frequency Types Of Problems\n-665(4)(b)(i) Weekly and after storms* Deterioration, malfunction, or\nRun-on and run-off control improper operation\n-665(4)(b)(ii) Weekly and after storms* Proper functioning\nWind dispersal control systems\n-665(4)(b)(iii) Weekly and after storms* Presence of leachate; proper\nLeachate collection and removal functioning\nsystems\n-665(4)(c)(i) Weekly and after storms* Amount of liquids removed\nLeak detection system sump\nSecondary leak detection system Monthly** Presence of unexpected liquid\nsump** volume**\nSecurity devices: Weekly Signs are posted and legible\n\"Danger unauthorized personnel\nkeep out\" signs\nAreas subject to spills Daily when waste management activities Evidence of spills\nhaving a potential for a spill to occur\nI *A storm is any atmospheric disturbance with either wind gust of 56.3 kilometers per hour (35 miles per hour) or greater, or\n2 precipitation of 0.5 inch or greater within a 24-hour period.\n3 **Note: Secondary leak detection system is not a design requirement of WAC 173-303-665, however DOE is adding the design\n4 feature pursuant to its authority under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (AEA) and not for the purposes of compliance\n5 with the dangerous waste regulations. Therefore, formation regarding the design, construction, and operation of the\n6 secondary leak detection system is provided for information only. Pursuant to AEA, DOE has sole and exclusive\n7 responsibility and authority to regulate the source, special nuclear and by-product material component of radioactive\n8 mixed waste at DOE-owned nuclear facilities. Source, special nuclear and by-product materials, as defined by AEA, are\n9 not subject to regulation under RCRA or the Hazardous Waste Management Act, by the State of Washington and are not\n10 be subject to State dangerous waste permit, orders, or any other enforceable instrument issued there under. DOE\n11 recognizes that radionuclide data may be useful in the development and confirmation of geohydrologic conceptual\n12 models. Radionuclide data contained herein is therefore provided as a matter of comity so the information may be used\n13 for such purposes.\nChapter 6.14\n I\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nCHAPTER 8.0\nPERSONNEL TRAINING\nChapter 8.i\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\n6\nChapter 8.ii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2 CHAPTER 8.0\n3 PERSONNEL TRAINING\n4\n5 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n6 8.0 PERSONNEL TRAINING [H] ........................... ..................... 8.5\n7 8.1 Outline of Introductory and Continuing Training Programs [H-2] ....................... 8.5\n8 8.2 Description of Training Plan............................... ................... 8.5\n9\n10\nChapter 8.iii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nChapter 8.iv\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 8.0 PERSONNEL TRAINING [H]\n2 This chapter discusses personnel training requirements based on WAC 173-303 and the Hanford Facility\n3 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Permit (Permit). Permit Condition II.C (Personnel\n4 Training), contains training requirements applicable to Hanford Facility personnel and non-Facility\n5 personnel. Compliance with these requirements at the Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF) is demonstrated\n6 by information contained in Permit Attachment 5, and this chapter. This chapter supplements Permit\n7 Attachment 5.\n8 8.1 Outline of Introductory and Continuing Training Programs [H-2]\n9 The introductory and continuing training programs are designed to prepare personnel to manage and\n10 maintain the treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) unit in a safe, effective, and environmentally sound\n11 manner. In addition to preparing personnel to manage and maintain TSD units under normal conditions,\n12 the training programs ensure that personnel are prepared to respond in a prompt and effective manner\n13 should abnormal or emergency conditions occur. Emergency response training is consistent with the\n14 description of actions contained in Addendum J.1, Contingency Plan, Pre-Active Life.\n15 Introductory training includes general Hanford Facility training and TSD unit-specific training. General\n16 Hanford Facility training is described in Permit Attachment 5, and is provided in accordance with Permit\n17 Condition II.C.2. TSD unit-specific training is provided to Hanford Facility personnel allowing personnel\n18 to work unescorted. Hanford Facility personnel cannot perform a task for which they are not properly\n19 trained, except to gain required experience while under the direct supervision of a supervisor or coworker\n20 who is properly trained. Hanford Facility personnel assigned the job title of Emergency Coordinator and\n21 alternates to this position performing tasks described in WAC 173-303-360 (e.g., Building Emergency\n22 Directors) are thoroughly familiar with applicable contingency plan documentation, operations, activities,\n23 location, and properties of all waste handled, location of all records, and the unit/building layout.\n24 Continuing training meets the requirements for WAC 173-303-330(1)(b) and includes general Hanford\n25 Facility training and TSD unit-specific training. General Hanford Facility training is the same as\n26 described for introductory training. TSD unit-specific training provides an annual review of emergency\n27 response training and an annual review of training necessary to ensure TSD unit operations are in\n28 compliance with WAC 173-303.\n29 8.2 Description of Training Plan\n30 In accordance with Permit Condition II.C.3, the unit-specific portion of the Hanford Facility Dangerous\n31 Waste Permit Application must contain a description of the training plan. The plan is written to comply\n32 with WAC 173-303-330. Written training plan documentation is maintained outside of the Hanford\n33 Facility Dangerous Waste Permit Application and the Permit. Therefore, changes made to the written\n34 training plan documentation are not subject to the Permit modification process. The training plan will be\n35 maintained as part of the operating records of the facility and will be available to regulators upon request.\nChapter 8.5\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nChapter 8.6\n N\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nCHAPTER 11.0\nCLOSURE\nChapter 11.i\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nChapter 11 .ii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2 CHAPTER 11.0\n3 CLOSURE\n4\n5 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n6 11.0 CLOSURE......................................................11.5\n7 11.1 Closure Plan................ .......................................... 11.5\n8 11.2 Closure Performance Standards........................................11.5\n9 11.3 Preclosure Activities...............................................11.5\n10 11.4 Maximum Extent of Operation........................................11.5\n11 11.5 Decontaminating Equipment and Structures................................11.6\n12 11.5.1 Contaminated Soil ........................................................ 11.6\n13 11.6 Closure of Landfill Units............................................11.6\n14 11.6.1 Cover Design....................................................11.6\n15 11.6.2 Wind Erosion....................................................11.8\n16 11.6.3 Water Erosion....................................................11.8\n17 11.6.4 Deep-Rooted Plants................................................11.8\n18 11.7 Schedule for Closure................................................11.9\n19 11.8 Extension for Closure...............................................11.9\n20 11.9 Postclosure Plan..................................................11.9\n21\n22 FIGURE\n23 Figure 11.1. Typical Hanford Site Landfill Cover Design..............................11.10\n24\n25\nChapter .1.iii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nChapter 11 iv\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 11.0 CLOSURE\n2 This chapter discusses preclosure, closure, and post closure activities for the Integrated Disposal Facility\n3 (IDF). This closure plan complies with WAC 173-303-610 and represents the baseline for closure.\n4 The IDF has been constructed on 25 hectares of vacant land southwest of the Plutonium Uranium\n5 Extraction Facility (PUREX) Plant in the 200 East Area [see the topographic map on file at the\n6 Department of Ecology library (3100 Port of Benton Boulevard, Richland, WA 99354)]. The landfill is\n7 segregated into a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) permitted side and a non-RCRA\n8 permitted side. The scope of this permit is limited to the western side of the landfill where the RCRA\n9 waste will be placed. The waste containers and bulk waste that meet the IDF waste acceptance criteria\n10 will be inventoried, and disposed in this lined landfill. Leachate collected from the lined landfill will be\n11 transferred to leachate collection tanks located in proximity to the landfill for subsequent treatment.\n12 A more detailed discussion of IDF waste types and the identification of the IDF processes and equipment\n13 are provided in Chapters 3.0 and 4.0, and attendant appendices. The IDF only will accept and dispose\n14 waste containers and bulk waste that meet the IDF waste acceptance criteria, RCRA and Land Disposal\n15 Restriction (LDR).\n16 The closure process will be the same for partial closure or closure of the entire IDF. The remainder of\n17 this chapter describes the performance standards that will be met, and the closure/post closure activities\n18 that will be conducted.\n19 11.1 Closure Plan\n20 Waste containers and bulk waste that meet the IDF waste acceptance criteria will be disposed in the lined\n21 landfill that complies with WAC 173-303-665 standards (Chapter 4.0). The IDF will be closed according\n22 to current applicable WAC 173-303 regulations, United States Department of Energy (DOE)\n23 requirements, best management practices, and will be integrated with the overall cleanup activities\n24 performed under the Tri-Party Agreement (HFFACO).\n25 The disposal landfill cover will be designed and located to comply with WAC 173-303-665(6) and\n26 WAC 173-303-610. The specification and/or variation for other cover designs will be provided at the\n27 time of closure once a hazard(s) has been defined.\n28 11.2 Closure Performance Standards\n29 Closure requirements found in WAC 173-303-665(6), incorporated by reference, and detailed here in\n30 Chapter 11.0 of the IDF portion of the permit, will make up the closure performance standards for the\n31 IDF.\n32 11.3 Preclosure Activities\n33 Preclosure activities could include, at a minimum, placing interim or final covers over the filled portions\n34 of the landfill as the landfill is expanded to accept more waste. Placement of covers over the filled\n35 portions might be deferred until closure of all the IDF. Once a decision is made to construct the final\n36 cover over the landfill, a closure cover design will be used that satisfies the dangerous waste disposal\n37 requirements defined in WAC 173-303.\n38 The selection of a final cover design has not been identified. Figure I1-I shows an example of a typical\n39 Hanford Site landfill cover design. Design(s) will include features to satisfy the minimum requirements\n40 found in WAC 173-303-665(6).\n41 11.4 Maximum Extent of Operation\n42 The maximum process design capacity of the IDF conservatively is calculated to be 100 hectare-meters,\n43 which is 1,000,000 cubic meters (Chapter 1.0, Part A, Form, Section III). The IDF landfill will be\n44 segregated into a RCRA permitted side of 50 hectare-meters and a non-RCRA permitted side of\n45 50 hectare-meters.\nChapter 11.5\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 11.5 Decontaminating Equipment and Structures\n2 All ancillary equipment and its secondary containment, and instrumentation (e.g., level-indicating\n3 devices, leak detection devices, pumps, piping) meet the definition of \"debris\" as defined in\n4 WAC 173-303-040. Items in direct contact with mixed waste are assumed to meet the definition of\n5 \"hazardous debris\" as defined in WAC 173-303-040.\n6 Currently, three options are available for treating hazardous debris. The first option is to treat the debris\n7 using one of the three debris treatment technologies-extraction, destruction, or immobilization-as\n8 described in 40 CFR 268.45. If the hazardous debris is treated using approved extraction or destruction\n9 technologies, the debris is no longer required to be managed as a dangerous waste as long as the debris\n10 does not exhibit a characteristic of a dangerous waste. If hazardous debris contaminated with a listed\n11 waste is treated using an immobilization technology, it remains a listed waste, even after the LDR\n12 treatment standards are met unless Ecology makes a case-by-case determination that the debris \"no longer\n13 contains\" a mixed waste. In effect, by making this \"contained-in\" determination on a case-by-case basis,\n14 Ecology will be setting clean closure standards in accordance with the closure performance standards of\n15 WAC 173-303-610(2)(a)(ii).\n16 The second option is to treat the hazardous debris to meet the constituent-specific LDR treatment standard\n17 for the waste or waste-specific constituents contaminating the debris; however, such debris, even after\n18 treatment, may be considered a dangerous waste under the dangerous waste regulations and may require\n19 management at a facility permitted to manage dangerous waste.\n20 The third option involves obtaining a \"contained-in determination\" for the hazardous debris, thereby\n21 rendering the waste \"non-hazardous\" for those waste-specific-listed constituents that fall below Model\n22 Toxic Control Act (MTCA) method B risk-based health limits. Moreover, it must be proven that the\n23 debris does not designate as a characteristic waste under WAC-173-303.\n24 11.5.1 Contaminated Soil\n25 Contaminated soil could be generated as a result of spill cleanup. Since the majority of IDF operations\n26 will be performed within secondary containment (see Chapters 4.0 and 6.0) the potential for spilling\n27 dangerous waste into the surrounding soil is low. Contaminated soil generated as a result of a dangerous\n28 waste spill will be managed pursuant to WAC-173-303-200.\n29 Once the soil is designated, appropriate treatment and disposal or storage options will be determined and\n30 implemented.\n31 A contained-in determination could also be sought for contaminated soil generated as a result of a spill.\n32 For contaminated media the contained-in policy requires that a statistically based sampling plan be used\n33 for obtaining the data to support a contained-in demonstration. The contained-in policy does not require\n34 that the waste be analytically nondetectable for it to be considered nondangerous. However, the\n35 analytical results must prove that the listed constituents in the soil are below health-based limits as\n36 provided in WAC 173-303-610(2)(b)(i) and that the soil does not exhibit any dangerous waste\n37 characteristics (i.e., soil does not designate for D codes). If approved by Ecology, this could allow waste\n38 that falls below specific health-based levels to be disposed of without requiring treatment\n39 11.6 Closure of Landfill Units\n40 Closure of the IDF will be consistent with the closure requirements specified in WAC-173-303-665(6)\n41 and WAC 173-303-610. The cover design(s) will satisfy the requirements of WAC 173-303-665(6).\n42 11.6.1 Cover Design\n43 The cover could consist of several layers constructed on top of a native soil base. A generalized\n44 cross-section of an example cover is shown on Figure I 1-1. It is assumed that before construction of the\n45 final cover, the waste form would be stabilized appropriately.\nChapter 11.6\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 11.6.1.1 Grade Layer\n2 The surface of the landfill would be graded and/or shaped, if necessary, to match the slope of the desired\n3 low-permeability layer. Additional soil would be placed over the landfill to achieve the required cover\n4 grade. This grade layer could taper from zero thickness near the edge of the cover boundary to perhaps\n5 several meters at the center of the cover; the thickness would depend on the lateral dimensions of the\n6 particular cover and the grade of the cover.\n7 11.6.1.2 Low-Permeability Layer\n8 The selection of an appropriate material for this layer would be based on the hazard that is to be isolated.\n9 The low-permeability layer will be the primary barrier in preventing soil and/or water from migrating into\n10 the waste zone and meet WAC 173-303-655(6)(v) \"Have a permeability less than or equal to the\n11 permeability of any bottom liner system or natural sub soils present\".\n12 11.6.1.3 Drainage Layer\n13 The drainage layer would conduct any water that percolates through the overlying layers laterally to the\n14 drainage ditch. Thus, the drainage layer would prevent hydraulic pressure from building up directly on\n15 the low-permeability liner, and thereby eliminate one set of forces that would drive moisture through the\n16 primary moisture control barrier.\n17 11.6.1.4 Plant, Animal, and Human Intrusion Layer (optional)\n18 The performance objectives for the permanent isolation surface barrier are summarized as follows:\n19 * Function in a semiarid to sub-humid environment.\n20 * Limit the recharge of water through the waste to near zero amounts [0.05 centimeter per year\n21 (1.6x109 centimeters per second)].\n22 * Be maintenance free.\n23 * Minimize the likelihood of plant, animal, and human intrusion.\n24 * Limit the exhalation of noxious gases.\n25 * Minimize erosion-related problems.\n26 * Meet or exceed WAC 173-303-665(6) cover performance requirements.\n27 * Isolate waste for 1,000 years.\n28 To satisfy the intrusion performance objective, an optional layer would be included in the design of\n29 barriers that require the additional human and/or biointrusion protection to reduce either the\n30 environmental or human health risk.\n31 11.6.1.5 Graded Filter Layer\n32 A graded filter consisting of crushed rock overlaid by sand would be placed on the plant, animal, and\n33 human intrusion layer if incorporated into the design, or directly over the drainage layer. The graded\n34 filter would serve to separate the surface soil layer from the drainage layer. A geotextile would be placed\n35 on the top of the graded filter to decrease the potential for fine material to enter the filter and drainage\n36 zone. The geotextile would be permeable, allowing drainage, and would not support a standing head of\n37 water.\n38 11.6.1.6 Surface Soil Layer\n39 The two most important factors in engineering the surface soil thickness would be the assignment of the\n40 water retention characteristics for soil and climate information. Surface soil would be placed over the\n41 geotextile to intercept, store, recycle water, and prevent damage to the underlying structure from natural\n42 and synthetic processes.\nChapter 11.7\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 11.6.1.7 Vegetative Cover\n2 The vegetative cover would perform three functions. First, the plants would return water stored in the\n3 surface soil back to the atmosphere, significantly decreasing net infiltration and reducing the amount of\n4 moisture available to penetrate the cover. Second, the vegetation would stabilize the surface soil\n5 component of the cover against wind and water erosion. Finally, the vegetative cover would restore the\n6 appearance of the land to a more natural condition and appearance.\n7 A mixture of seeds would be used to establish vegetation. The seed types would be selected based on\n8 resistance to drought, rooting density, and ability to extract water.\n9 11.6.2 Wind Erosion\n10 The principal hazard associated with wind erosion is the thinning of the cover surface soil layer. This in\n11 turn potentially could lead to breaching of the moisture barriers, gradually allowing larger quantities of\n12 water to reach the waste. The engineering approaches to mitigating wind erosion of the cover would be\n13 (1) designing the surface soil layer with an appropriate total thickness to compensate for future soil loss\n14 that might result from wind erosion, (2) establishing a vegetative cover on the surface to reduce wind\n15 erosion, and (3) including an appropriate coarse material (admix) in the upper layer of the surface soil to\n16 form an armor layer.\n17 11.6.3 Water Erosion\n18 The potential hazard associated with water erosion is the same as that for wind erosion, namely the loss of\n19 soil from the top or surface layer.\n20 Several of the following engineering approaches could be adopted to minimize the potential for water\n21 erosion:\n22 * Limiting the surface slopes.\n23 * Providing run-on control with the sideslope drainage ditches.\n24 * Compacting the surface soil in a way that promotes significant infiltration rather than excessive\n25 run-off.\n26 * Properly designing the sideslopes to prevent gullying.\n27 * Establishing a vegetative cover to slow surface run-off.\n28 * Incorporating coarse material (pea gravel admix) in the upper portion of the surface soil layer to\n29 help form an erosion-resistant armor.\n30 * Limiting flow path lengths through the use of vegetation and admix.\n31 The cover design would be evaluated for potential erosion damage from overall soil erodibility, sheet\n32 flow, and gullying.\n33 11.6.4 Deep-Rooted Plants\n34 The following design features could minimize the potential for problems with deep-rooted plants.\n35 * The surface soil (top two layers) would retain most of the precipitation, because the underlying\n36 drainage layer would have significantly higher permeability and much less water retention\n37 capacity. Therefore, it is expected that vegetation preferentially would occupy the surface soil\n38 layer and not have an affinity for growing into the drier underlying layers.\n39 * The thickness of the surface soils would be sized to promote the development of semiarid\n40 deep-rooted perennial grasses and to discourage the development of deep-rooting intrusive\n41 species.\nChapter 11.8\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 11.7 Schedule for Closure\n2 As stated previously, closure of the IDF will be a complex process. At the time of closure, this closure\n3 plan will be updated to reflect the current closure plan schedule per WAC 173-303-830, Appendix I. In\n4 addition, when a closure date is established, a revised closure plan and closure schedule will be submitted\n5 to Ecology that contains detailed information regarding specific activities and implementation\n6 timeframes.\n7 11.8 Extension for Closure\n8 An extension for closure request is anticipated to complete the closure/post closure process of the IDF.\n9 11.9 Postclosure Plan\n10 Because of the long active life of the TDF, a comprehensive post closure plan will be developed when\n11 closure becomes imminent or when 200 Areas cleanup activities prescribed by the Tri-Party Agreement\n12 require integration.\nChapter 11.9\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\nVegetative Cover Geocomposite Drainage Layer\nSurface Soil Layer Flexlble Membrane Liner (optional)\nCompacted Soli/Bentonite Admix\nGrade Layer\n2 ft Riprap Layer\n1 ft Riprap Bedding Layer\n3%\n3ft .. Drainage Ditch\n2f\nVaries ..\nV ~~~Waete FingSolCoe\nNotes:\n1. Drawing not to acale.\n2. Cover ahown for unlined trench.\nSimilar configuration for Ined trench.\nTo convert feet (ft) to metera, multiply by 0.3048.\nHt0040105.2\nM01 05-2.1\n5/311\n2\n3 Figure 11.1. Typical Hanford Site Landfill Cover Design\n4\n5\nChapter 11.10\n N\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2 CHAPTER 13.0\n3 OTHER FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS\n4\n5\nChapter 13.i\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page is intentionally left blank.\n5\nChapter 13.ii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2 CHAPTER 13.0\n3 OTHER FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS\n4\n5\n6 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n7 13.0 OTHER FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS [J] ........................ ........... 13.5\n8\n9\nChapter 13.iii\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nChapter 13.iv\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1 13.0 OTHER FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS [J]\n2 Generally, the laws applicable to the IDF include, but might not be limited to, the following:\n3 * Atomic Energy Act of 1954\n4 * Federal Facility Compliance Act of 1992\n5 * Clean Air Act of 1977\n6 * Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974\n7 * Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986\n8 * Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976\n9 * National Historic Preservation Act of 1966\n10 * Endangered Species Act of 1973\n11 * Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act of 1934\n12 * Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act of 1975\n13 * Hazardous Materials Transportation Act of 1975\n14 * National Environmental Policy Act of 1969\n15 * Washington Clean Air Act of 1967\n16 * Washington Water Pollution Control Act of 1945\n17 * Washington Pesticide Control Act of 1971\n18 * State Environmental Policy Act of 19 71.\n19 * Letter , C.J.Paperiello NRC to JE Kinzer DOE/RL \"Classification ofHanford Low-Activity\n20 Tank Waste Fraction\" dated June 9th 1997\n21\nChapter 13.5\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nChapter 13.6\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nOFFICIAL USE ONLY\nThis information has been identified as Official Use Only.\nOfficial Use Only (OUO) information is certain unclassified information that may be exempt from public\nrelease under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and has the potential to damage governmental,\ncommercial, or private interests if disseminated to persons who do not need to know the information to\nperform their jobs or other DOE-authorized activities.\nPer the U.S. Department of Energy's Official Use Only Policy and DOE Order 471.3, Administrative\nChange 1, \"Identifying and Protecting Official Use Only Information\" and DOE M 471.3.1\nAdministrative Change 1, \"Manual for Identifying and Protecting Official Use Only Information,\" the\nfollowing document and associated changes is granted confidentiality and is exempt from public review:\nTitle: Addendum J. 1: Contingency Plan-Pre-Active Life\nOFFICIAL USE ONLY\nThis information is exempt from public inspection and copying.\n WA7890008967\nIntegrated Disposal Facility\nOFFICIAL USE ONLY\nThis information has been identified as Official Use Only.\nOfficial Use Only (OUO) information is certain unclassified information that may be exempt from public\nrelease under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and has the potential to damage governmental,\ncommercial, or private interests if disseminated to persons who do not need to know the information to\nperform their jobs or other DOE-authorized activities.\nPer the U.S. Department of Energy's Official Use Only Policy and DOE Order 471.3, Administrative\nChange 1, \"Identifying and Protecting Official Use Only Information\" and DOE M 471.3.1\nAdministrative Change 1, \"Manual for Identifying and Protecting Official Use Only Information,\" the\nfollowing document and associated changes is granted confidentiality and is exempt from public review:\nTitle: Addendum J.2: Contingency Plan-Active Life\nOFFICIAL USE ONLY\nThis information is exempt from public inspection and copying.\n I\n WA7 89000 8967, Change Control Log\nHanford Federal Facility RCRA Permit Dangerous Waste Portion\nLiquid Effluent Retention Facility (LERF) &\n200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF)\nChange Control Log\nChange Control Logs ensure that changes to this unit are performed in a methodical, controlled, coordinated\nand transparent manner. Each unit addendum will have a \"Last Modification Date\" which represents the last\ndate the portion of the unit has been modified. The \"Modification Number\" represents Ecology's method for\ntracking the different versions of the permit. This log will serve as an up to date record of modifications and\nversion history of the unit.\nLast modification to Liquid Effluent Retention Facility & 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility June 30, 2015\nAddenda Last Modification Date Modification Number\nConditions 06/30/2015\nA. Part A Form 03/31/2015\nB. Waste Analysis Plan 06/30/2015\nC. Process Information 12/31/2014\nD. Groundwater Monitoring Plan 04/29/2014\nE. Security 06/30/2011\nF. Preparedness and Prevention 04/08/2014\nG. Personnel Training 06/30/2015\nH. Closure Plan 06/30/2011\n1. Inspection .04/08/2014\nJ. Contingency Plan 06/30/2015\nChange Control Log Liquid Effluent Retention Facility & 8C.2015.Q3\n200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nPART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3 PERMIT CONDITIONS\nLIQUID EFFLUENT RETENTION FACILITY & 200 AREA EFFLUENT TREATMENT FACILITY\nConditions. 1\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nConditions.2\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3 PERMIT CONDITIONS\n2 LIQUID EFFLUENT RETENTION FACILITY & 200 AREA EFFLUENT TREATMENT FACILITY\n3 UNIT DESCRIPTION\n4 The Liquid Effluent Retention Facility (LERF) and 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility(200 Area ETF)\n5 consists of an aqueous waste treatment system that provides treatment, storage integral to the treatment\n6 process, and storage of secondary wastes from the treatment process for a variety of aqueous mixed\n7 waste. The 200 Area ETF is located in the 200 East Area. Aqueous wastes managed by the 200 Area\n8 ETF include process condensate from the LERF and 200 Area ETF and other aqueous waste generated\n9 from onsite remediation and waste management activities.\n10 The LERF consists of three lined surface impoundments, or basins. Aqueous waste from LERF is\n11 pumped to the 200 Area ETF for treatment in a series of process units, or systems, that remove or destroy\n12 essentially all of the dangerous waste constituents. The treated effluent is discharged to a State-Approved\n13 Land Disposal Site (SALDS) north of the 200 West Area, under the authority of a Washington State\n14 Waste Discharge Permit (Ecology 2000) and 200 Area ETF Delisting (40 Code of Federal Regulations\n15 (CFR) 261, Appendix IX, Table 2). Construction of the LERF began in 1990. Waste management\n16 operations began at LERF in April 1994. Construction of the 200 Area ETF began in 1992. Waste\n17 management operations began at 200 Area ETF in November of 1995.\n18 This Chapter provides unit-specific Permit conditions applicable to the dangerous waste management\n19 units for LERF and 200 Area ETF.\n20 LIST OF ADDENDA SPECIFIC TO OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\n21 Addendum A Part A Form, dated March 31, 2015\n22 Addendum B Waste Analysis Plan, dated June 30, 2015\n23 Addendum C Process Information, dated December 31, 2014\n24 Addendum D Groundwater Monitoring, approved April 29, 2014\n25 Addendum E Security Requirements, dated, June 30, 2011\n26 Addendum F Preparedness and Prevention, dated April 8, 2014\n27 Addendum G Personnel Training, dated June 30, 2015\n28 Addendum H Closure Plan, dated June 30, 2011\n29 Addendum I Inspection Requirements, dated April 8, 2014\n30 Addendum J Contingency Plan, dated June 30, 2015\n31 DEFINITIONS\n32 State and federal delisting actions: The state delisting action pursuant to Washington Administrative\n33 Code (WAC) 173-303-910(3), August 8, 2005, and the federal delisting action appearing in 40 CFR 261,\n34 Appendix IX, Table 2 applicable to the United States, Department of Energy, Richland, Washington.\n35 ACRONYMS\n36 LERF and 200 Area ETF 200-Area Liquids Processing Facility\n37\nConditions.3\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1\n2 III.3.A COMPLIANCE WITH UNIT-SPECIFIC PERMIT CONDITIONS\n3 III.3.A.1 The Permittees will comply with all Permit Conditions in this Chapter and its\n4 Addendums and Chapters with respect to dangerous waste management and dangerous\n5 waste management units in LERF and 200 Area ETF, in addition to requirements in\n6 Permit Part I and Part II.\n7 III.3.B GENERAL WASTE MANAGEMENT\n8 III.3.B.1 The Permittees are authorized to accept dangerous and/or mixed waste for treatment in\n9 dangerous waste management units that satisfies the waste acceptance criteria in Permit\n10 Addendum B according to the waste acceptance procedures in Permit Addendum B.\n11 [WAC 173-303-300]\n12 III.3.B.2 The Permittees are authorized to manage dangerous and/or mixed wastes physically\n13 present in the dangerous waste management units in LERF and 200 Area ETF as of the\n14 effective date of this Permit according to the requirements of Permit Condition 111.15.B.1.\n15 III.3.B.3 The Permittees are authorized to treat and/or store dangerous/mixed waste in the\n16 dangerous waste management units in LERF and 200 Area ETF according to the\n17 following requirements:\n18 III.3.B.3.a The Permittees are authorized to treat, and store as necessary in support of treatment,\n19 dangerous waste in the 200 Area ETF tank systems identified in Permit Addendum C,\n20 Section C.2, and Section C.4 according to the Permit Conditions of this Chapter.\n21 III.3.B.3.b The Permittees are authorized to store and treat those dangerous and/or mixed waste\n22 identified in Permit Addendum C, Section C.3, in containers according to the\n23 requirements of this Chapter. All container management activities pursuant to this Permit\n24 Condition will take place within the container storage areas or within the 200 Area ETF\n25 process area identified in Permit Addendum C, Figures C.3 and C.4.\n26 III.3.B.3.c Treatment in containers authorized by Permit Condition 1Il.3.B.3.b is limited to decanting\n27 of free liquids, and addition of sorbents to free liquids. The Permittees will ensure that\n28 sorbents are compatible with wastes and the containers. Sorbents will be compliant with\n29 the requirements of WAC 173-303-140(4)(b)(iv), incorporated by reference.\n30 III.3.B.3.d The Permittees are authorized to treat aqueous waste in LERF Basins (Basins 42, 43 and\n31 44) subject to the following requirements:\n32 III.3.B.3.d.1 Following treatment in a LERF basin, aqueous wastes must be treated in 200 Area ETF\n33 according to Permit Conditions I1I.3.B.3.a through c.; [40 CFR 268.4(2)(iii), incorporated\n34 by reference by WAC 173-303-140]\n35 III.3.B.3.d.2 The Permittees must ensure that for each basin, either supernatant is removed on a flow-\n36 through basis, to meet the requirement of 40 CFR 268.4(a)(2)(ii) incorporated by\n37 reference by WAC 173-303-140, or incoming waste is shown to not contain solids by\n38 either: (1) sampling results showing the waste does not contain detectable solids, or\n39 (2) filtering through a 10 micron filter;[WAC 173-303-815(2)(b)(ii)]\n40 III.3.B.4 The Permittees will maintain the physical structure of the LERF and 200 Area ETF as\n41 documented in the applicable sections of Permit Addendum C, Section C.2.\n42 [WAC 173-303-630(7), WAC 173-303-640(3), WAC 173-303-640(4)]\n43 III.3.B.5 The Permittees are authorized to use treated effluent for recycle/makeup water purposes\n44 at the 200 Area ETF as outlined in Permit Addendum C, Section C.2.5.5, and the letters\nConditions.4\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 dated August 19, 2005, EPA Region 10 to Keith A. Klein; and August 8, 2005,\n2 Department of Ecology to Keith A. Klein. [WAC 173-303-815 (2)(b)(ii)]\n3 III.3.B.6 The Permittees will maintain and operate systems for the 200 Area ETF documented in\n4 Permit Addendum C, Section C.2.5 as necessary for proper operation of the 200 Area\n5 ETF, compliance with the conditions of this Permit, and protection of human health and\n6 the environment. For purposes of this Permit Condition, the Monitor and Control System\n7 documented in Permit Addendum C, Section C.2.5.1, is considered to include all\n8 indicators, sensors, transducers, actuators and other control devices connected to but\n9 remote from the centralized monitor and control system (MCS) computer.\n10 III.3.B.7 The Permittees must complete the following requirements prior to acceptance for\n11 treatment in 200 Area ETF aqueous waste streams with listed waste numbers subject to\n12 the requirements of the State and Federal delisting: [WAC 173-303-815(2)(b)(ii)]\n13 III.3.B.7.a The Permittees will prepare a written waste processing strategy according to the\n14 requirements of the State and Federal Delisting Actions Conditions (1)(a)(ii) and (1)(b),\n15 incorporated by reference, and Permit Addendum B, Section B.2.2.2.\n16 III.3.B.7.b The waste processing strategy required by Permit Condition 111.3.B.7.a, must document\n17 the proposed processing configuration for the 200 Area ETF, operating conditions for\n18 each processing unit, and the expected treated effluent characteristics based on the\n19 process model and treatability envelope data required by State and Federal Delisting\n20 Conditions (1)(a)(ii) and (1)(b).\n21 III.3.B.7.c The written waste processing strategy required by Permit Condition 111.3.B.7.a must\n22 demonstrate that the projected treated effluent characteristics satisfy the delisting\n23 exclusion limits in State and Federal Delisting Condition (5) of the state and federal\n24 delisting actions, and the discharge limits of the State Discharge Permit ST-4500.\n25 III.3.B.7.d The Permittees will place a copy of the written waste processing strategy required by\n26 Permit Condition III.3.B.7.a in the Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF and\n27 200 Area ETF file as part of the documentation of waste streams accepted for\n28 management at the 200 Area ETF.\n29 III.3.B.8 Treatment of aqueous waste streams in the 200 Area ETF with listed waste numbers that\n30 are subject to the requirements of the state and federal delisting actions must comply with\n31 the requirements of State and Federal Delisting Condition (1)(c), incorporated by\n32 reference. [WAC 173-303-815 (2)(b)(ii)]\n33 III.3.B.9 The Permittees will manage treated effluent in the final verification tanks according to\n34 the requirements of the State and Federal Delisting Conditions (3) and (5), incorporated\n35 by reference. [WAC 173-303-815 (2)(b)(ii)]\n36 III.3.B.10 The Permittees will manage treated effluent from the 200 Area ETF according to the\n37 requirements of the State Waste Discharge Permit ST 4500 and State and Federal\n38 Delisting Condition (7). [WAC 173-303-815(2)(b)(ii)]\n39 III.3.B. I1 The Permittees will ensure compliance with treatment standards (40 CFR 268,\n40 incorporated by reference by WAC 173-303-140) applicable to treated effluent prior to\n41 discharge to the State Authorized Land Disposal Site (SALDS), the delisting criteria at\n42 40 CFR 261, Appendix IX, Table 2, and the corresponding state-approved delisting\n43 (dated August 8, 2005, all incorporated by reference). Sampling and analysis necessary\n44 for these demonstrations must meet the corresponding requirements in Permit\n45 Addendum B. [WAC 173-303-140, WAC 173-303-815 (2)(b)(ii)]\nConditions.5\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 III.3.C WASTE ANALYSIS\n2 Ill.3.C.1 The Permittees will comply with requirements in Permit Addendum B for sampling and\n3 analysis of all dangerous and/or mixed waste required by conditions in this Chapter.\n4 [WAC 173-303-300]\n5 III.3.C.2 The Permittees will have an accurate and complete waste profile as described in Permit\n6 Addendum B, Section B.2.1.2, for every waste stream accepted for management in LERF\n7 and 200 Area ETF dangerous waste management units. [WAC 173-303-380 (1)(a), (b)]\n8 III.3.C.3 The Permittees will place a copy of each waste profile required by Permit\n9 Condition III.15.C.2 in the Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF and 200 Area ETF\n10 file required by Permit Condition II.I.1.j. [WAC 173-303-380 (1)(a), (b)]\n11 II.3.C.4 The Permittees will make a copy of the waste profile required by Permit\n12 Condition 1II.15.C.2 available upon request. [WAC 173-303-380 (1)(a), (b)]\n13 III.3.C.5 Records and results of waste analysis described in this Permit will be maintained in the\n14 Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF and 200 Area ETF file required by Permit\n15 Condition II.I.1.b. [WAC 173-303-380 (1)(a), (b)]\n16 111.3.D RECORDKEEPING AND REPORTING\n17 III.3.D.1 The Permittees will place the following into the Hanford Facility Operating Record,\n18 LERF and 200 Area ETF file required by Permit Condition 11.1.1:\n19 III.3.D.1.a Records required by WAC 173-303-380 (1)(k), and -(o) incorporated by reference.\n20 III.3.D.1.b Records and results of waste analysis, waste determinations (as required by Subpart CC)\n21 and trial tests required by WAC 173-303-300, General waste analysis, and by\n22 40 CFR 4264.1034,4264.1063, 4264.1083, 4265.1034, 4265.1063, 4265.1084, 268(a),\n23 and §268.7; [WAC 173-303-310(2)]\n24 Ill.3.D.1.c An inspection log, summarizing inspections conducted pursuant to Permit\n25 Condition III.3.H.1; [WAC 173-303-380(1)(e)]\n26 III.3.D.1.d Records required by the State and Federal Delisting Condition (6), incorporated by\n27 reference; [WAC 173-303-815 (2)(b)(ii)]\n28 III.3.E SECURITY\n29 III.3.E.1 The Permittees comply with the Security requirements specific to the LERF and 200\n30 Area ETF in Addendum E and Permit Attachment 3 as required by Permit\n31 Condition II.M. [WAC 173-303-310(2)]\n32 Ill.3.F PREPAREDNESS AND PREVENTION\n33 III.3.F.1 The Permittees will comply with the Preparedness and Prevention requirements specific\n34 to LERF and 200 Area ETF in Addendum F. [WAC 173-303-340]\n35 III.3.G CONTINGENCY PLAN\n36 III.3.G.1 The Permittees will comply with Addendum J, Contingency Plan, in addition to the\n37 requirements of Permit Condition II.A when applicable. [WAC 173-303-350]\n38 III.3.H INSPECTIONS\n39 III.3.H.1 The Permittees will comply with Addendum I in addition to the requirements of Permit\n40 Condition II.X. [ WAC 173-303-320]\nConditions.6\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 111.3.1 TRAINING PLAN\n2 111.3.1.1 The Permittees will include the training requirements described in Addendum G of this\n3 Chapter specific to the dangerous waste management units and waste management\n4 activities at LERF and 200 Area ETF into the written training plan required by Permit\n5 Condition II.C.\n6 III.3.J GENERAL REQUIREMENTS\n7 III.3.J.1 The Permittees will comply with the requirements of WAC 173-303-395(1), incorporated\n8 by reference, for prevention of reaction of ignitable, reactive, or incompatible wastes.\n9 III.3.K CLOSURE\n10 III.3.K.1 The Permittees will close dangerous waste management units in the LERF and 200 Area\n11 ETF in accordance with Addendum H, Closure Plan, and Permit Condition II.J.\n12 [WAC 173-303-610(3)(a)]\n13 III.3.L POST CLOSURE -RESERVED\n14 Ill.3.M CRITICAL SYSTEMS -RESERVED\n15 Ill.3.N RESERVED\n16 111.3.0 CONTAINERS\n17 111.3.0.1 Container Storage and Treatment Unit Standards\n18 Ill.3.0.1.a As part of or in addition to the requirements of Permit Condition III.3.B.2, the Permittees\n19 will ensure the integrity of container storage secondary containment and the chemically\n20 resistant coating described in Addendum C, Section C.3.4.1 as necessary to ensure any\n21 spills or releases to secondary containment do not migrate to the underlying concrete or\n22 soils.\n23 III.3.0.1.a.1 Include documentation of any damage and subsequent repairs in the Hanford Facility\n24 Operating Record, LERF and 200 Area ETF file required by Permit Condition 11.1.1.\n25 111.3.0.2 Container Management Standards\n26 II.3.0.2.a The Permittees will maintain and manage wastes in accordance with the requirements of\n27 Addendum C, Section 4.3.2, and Section 4.3.2. [WAC 173-303-630(2)]\n28 III.3.0.2.b The Permittees will label containers in accordance with the requirements of\n29 Addendum C, Section C.3.2, and Section C.3.3. [WAC 173-303-630(3)]\n30 III.3.0.2.c The Permittees will comply with the requirements for managing wastes in containers in\n31 WAC 173-303-630(5), incorporated by reference.\n32 1II.3.0.2.d The Permittees will ensure wastes are compatible with containers and with other wastes\n33 stored or treated in containers within the 200 Area ETF according to the requirements of\n34 Addendum C, Section C.3.4.3. [WAC 173-303-630(4), WAC 173-303-630(9)]\n35 Ill.3.0.2.e The Permittees may treat wastes in containers via decanting of free liquids and addition\n36 of sorbents. The Permittees may not use addition of sorbents for purposes of changing\n37 the treatability group of a waste with respect to the land disposal restriction standards of\n38 40 CFR 268, incorporated by reference by WAC 173-303-140.\n39 III.3.0.2.f The Permittees will remove any accumulated liquids from container storage areas in\n40 200 Area ETF according to the requirements of Addendum C, Section C.3.4.2, to ensure\n41 containers are not in contact with free liquids and to prevent overflow of the container\n42 storage area secondary containment.\nConditions.7\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 III.3.0.2.g The Permittees will comply with the requirements for air emissions from containers in\n2 Addendum C, Section C.6.3.2. [WAC 173-303-692]\n3 Ill.3.P TANK SYSTEMS\n4 III.3.P.1 Tank System Requirements\n5 III.3.P.1.a The Permittees will develop a schedule for conducting integrity assessments (IA). The\n6 schedule will meet the requirements of Addendum C, Section C.4.2, and consideration of\n7 the factors in WAC 173-303-640(2)(e) or WAC 173-303-640(3)(b) as applicable:\n8 III.3.P.1.b The Permittees will maintain a copy of the schedule required by Permit\n9 Condition III.3.P. .a, in the Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF and 200 Area ETF\n10 file, and conduct periodic integrity assessments according to the schedule. The\n11 Permittees will document results of integrity assessments conducted according to the IA\n12 in the Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF and 200 Area ETF file.\n13 III.3.P.1.c For existing tank systems, if a tank system is found to be leaking, or is unfit for use, the\n14 Permittees must follow the requirements of WAC 173-303-640(7), incorporated by\n15 reference. [WAC 173-303-640(3)(b)]\n16 III.3.P.2 Tank System Operating Requirements\n17 III.3.P.2.a The Permittees will comply with the requirements of WAC 173-303-640(5)(a),\n18 incorporated by reference.\n19 Ill.3.P.2.b The Permittees will comply with the requirements of Addendum C, Section C.4.5.2.\n20 [WAC 173-303-640(5)(b)]\n21 III.3.P.2.c The Permittees will comply with the requirements of Addendum C, Section C.4.6.\n22 [WAC 173-303-640(5)(d)]\n23 Ill.3.P.2.d The Permittees will comply with the requirements of WAC 173-303-640(7), incorporated\n24 by reference, in response to spills or leaks from tanks systems at 200 Area ETF.\n25 [WAC 173-303-640(5)(c)]\n26 III.3.P.2.e The Permittees will ensure that the Waste Processing Strategy required by Permit\n27 Condition III.3.B.7.a, provides for the immediate treatment or blending of waste accepted\n28 for management at the 200 Area ETF such that the resulting waste or mixture is no longer\n29 reactive or ignitable when further managed in 200 Area ETF tank systems.\n30 [WAC 173-303-640(9)]\n31 III.3.P.2.f The Permittees will comply with the requirements of WAC 173-303-640(10),\n32 incorporated by reference.\n33 III.3.Q SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS\n34 111.3.Q.1 The Permittees will maintain the three LERF basins according to the requirements of\n35 WAC 173-303-650 (2)(f), incorporated by reference.\n36 III.3.Q.2 The Permittees will operate the LERF basins according to the requirements of\n37 Addendum C, Section C.5.3, and Addendum I, Section 1.2.2.3.1 to prevent over-topping.\n38 [WAC 173-303-650 (2)(c)]\n39 III.3.Q.3 The Permittees will develop and maintain, and operate the LERF basins to ensure that\n40 any flow of waste into the impoundment can be immediately shut off in the event of\n41 overtopping or liner failure. [WAC 173-303-650 (2)(d)]\n42 111.3.Q.4 The Permittees will comply with the requirements of WAC 173-303-650 (2)(g),\n43 incorporated by reference.\nConditions.8\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI III.3.Q.5 The Permittees will comply with the requirements of WAC 173-303-650 (4)(b),\n2 incorporated by reference.\n3 111.3.Q.6 The Permittees will comply with the requirements of WAC 173-303-650 (4)(c),\n4 incorporated by reference. The certification required by this Permit Condition must be\n5 provided to Ecology no later than seven calendar days after the date of the certification.\n6 A copy of the certification will be placed in the Hanford Facility Operating Record,\n7 LERF and 200 Area ETF file required by Permit Condition 11.1.1. [WAC 173-303-650\n8 (4)(c)]\n9 111.3.0.7 The Permittees will comply with the requirements of WAC 173-303-650(5)(b),\n10 incorporated by reference, in response to events in WAC 173-303-650(5)(a), incorporated\n11 by reference.\n12 111.3.Q.8 The Permittees will comply with the requirements of WAC 173-303-650(5)(d) for any\n13 LERF basin that has been removed from service in accordance with Permit\n14 Condition III.3.Q.7 that the Permittees will restore to service. [WAC 173-303-650(5)(d)]\n15 111.3.Q.9 The Permittees will close any LERF basin removed from service in accordance with the\n16 requirements of Permit Condition III.3.Q.7 or a basin that cannot be repaired or that the\n17 Permittees will not to return to service. [WAC 173-303-650(5)(e)]\n18 III.3.Q.10 The Permittees will comply with the requirements of Addendum C, Section C.5.10 with\n19 respect to management of ignitable or reactive wastes in the LERF basins.\n20 [WAC 173-303-650(7)]\n21 III.3.Q.11 The Permittees can place incompatible wastes and materials in the same LERF basin only\n22 if in compliance with the requirements of WAC 173-303-395(l)(b), (c).\n23 [WAC 173-303-650(8)]\n24 111.3.Q.12 The Permittees will use the action leakage rate in Addendum C, Section C.5.8, for\n25 operation of LERF basins, and comply with the requirements of\n26 WAC 173-303-650(10)(b). [WAC 173-303-650(10)]\n27 111.3.Q.13 The Permittees will comply with the requirements of WAC 173-303-650(1 1),\n28 incorporated by reference.\n29 111.3.Q.14 The Permittees will comply with the requirements of 40 CFR 264, Subpart CC,\n30 incorporated by reference by WAC 173-303-692.\n31 III.3.R GROUNDWATER\n32 III.3.R.1 The Permittees will comply with the requirements of Addendum D, Groundwater\n33 Monitoring Plan. [WAC 173-303-645]\n34 III.3.R.2 All wells constructed pursuant to this Permit will be constructed in compliance with\n35 Chapter 173-160 WAC incorporated by reference through WAC 173-303-645 (8)(c).\n36 II.3.R.3 Update the Groundwater Monitoring Network\n37 Ill.3.R.3.a The Permittees will install an additional downgradient monitoring well E-26-15 as\n38 identified in Addendum D, Groundwater Monitoring Plan by December, 2016.\n39 Il.3.R.3.b Within 60-days of the well installation, the Permittees will submit a Class 2 Permit\n40 modification [WAC 173-303-830 Appendix I, C.1.a] to update Addendum D and include\n41 the additional monitoring well into the groundwater monitoring network.\nConditions.9\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI III.3.R.3.c Concurrently with the permit modification request, the Permittees will submit a revised\n2 \"Liquid Effluent Retention Facility Characterization Report\" for the additional\n3 monitoring well that includes:\n4 1) Well construction in accordance with WAC 173-303-645(8)(c)\n5 2) Well screen placement in the upper aquifer in accordance with\n6 WAC 173-303-645(8)(a)\n7 3) Hydrogeologic conditions, stratigraphy and hydraulic conductivity, derived from\n8 geologist observations of borehole archive samples, down hole gamma logging,\n9 and aquifer slug tests in accordance with WAC 173-303-645(8)(a)(i)(A)\n10 4) Drilling and sampling details in accordance with WAC 173-303-645(8)(d)\n11 5) Borehole corrections (e.g., precision surveys, gyroscopic corrections, and\n12 barometric response corrections) to ensure adequate hydraulic understanding\n13 considering the very small gradient in accordance with WAC 173-303-645(8)(f)\n14 6) Geochemical comparison of the water quality with other existing wells to ensure\n15 anticipated representative conditions in accordance with\n16 WAC 173-303-645(8)(a)(ii)\n17 7) Document surface location as required by WAC 173-303-645(6)\n18 III.3.R.3.c.1 Groundwater sample results from the new well (E-26-15) and the existing wells for all\n19 constituents in the Addendum D, Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the Liquid Effluent\n20 Retention Facility,\n21 III.3.R.3.c.2 Results of evaluating final well development data and drilling logs,\n22 III.3.R.3.c.2.a A well use designation (e.g., upgradient or downgradient).\nConditions. 10\n Permit WA7890008967 Part 111, Operating Unit Group 3\nLiquid Effluent Retention Facility & 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility, Rev. 4\nWASHINGTON STATE AddendumA\nDEP ARTM F\nUE C 0 L 0 G Y Par Aor\nDate Received Reviewed by: P ar Date: r / 2 0\nMonth Day Year Approved by: Date: 6 5 / 2\nI. This form is submitted to: (place an \"X\" In the appropriate box)\nN Request modification to a final status permit (commonly called a \"Part B\" permit)\nD Request a change under interim status\nO] Apply for a final status permit. This Includes the application for the initial final status permit for a site or\nfor a permit renewal (i.e., a new permit to replace an expiring permit).\nO Establish interim status because of the wastes newly regulated on: (Date)\nList waste codes:\nII. EPA/State ID Number\nW A78 90008967\nIll. Name of Facility\nUS Department of Energy -Hanford Facility\nIV. Facility Location (Physical address not P.O. Box or Route Number)\nA. Street\n825 Jadwin\nCity or Town State ZIP Code\nRichland WA 99352\nCounty\nCode (if County Name\n0 0 5 Benton\nB. C. Geographic Location D. Facility Existence Date\nLand Latitude (degrees, mins, Longitude (degrees, mins, secs) Month Day YearType secs)\nF Refer to TOPO Map (Section XV.) 0 3 0 2 1 9 4 3\nV. Facility Mailing Address\nStreet or P.O. Box\nP.O. Box 450\nCity or Town State ZIP Code\nRichland WA 99352\nECY 030-31 Hanford (Rev. 3/5/04) Page 1 of 16\n Permit WA7890008967 Part III, Operating Unit Group 3\nLiquid Effluent Retention Facility & 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility, Rev. 4\nVI. Facility contact (Person to be contacted regarding waste activities at facility)\nName (last) (first)\nSmith Kevin\nJob Title Phone Number (area code and number)\nManager (509) 372-2315\nContact Address\nStreet or P.O. Box\nP.O. Box 450\nCity or Town State ZIP Code\nRichland WA 99352\nVII. Facility Operator Information\nA. Name Phone Number\nDepartment of Energy Owner/Operator (509) 372-2315\nWashington River Protection Solutions, LLC Co-Operator for LERF & 200 Area ETF* (509) 372-9138*\nStreet or P.O. Box\nP.O. Box 450\nP.O. Box 850 *\nCity or Town State ZIP Code\nRichland WA 99352\nB. Owera Type F\nC. Does the name in VII.A reflect a proposed change in operator? LI Yes Z No Co-Operator* change\nIf yes, provide the scheduled date for the change: Month Day Year\nD. Is th name listed in VIl.A. also the owner? If yes, skip to Section VIII.C. U Yes Z No\nViII. Facility Owner Information\nA. e Phone umber(ar ode d numb)\nKevin W. Smith, Operator/Facility-Property Owner (509) 372-2315\nStreet or P.O. Box\nP.O. Box 450\nCity or 'Town State ZIP.Co de\nRichland WA 99352\nB. Owner Type F\nC. Does the name in Vill.A reflect a proposed change in owner? Yes No\nIf yes, provide the scheduled date for the change: Month Day Year\nIX. NAICS Codes (516 digit codes)\nA. First B. Second\n5 6 12 12 1 Waste Treatmenit & Disposal 9 2 41 I1 0 m limistraticm of Air & Water Resource &\nC. Third D. Fourth\n5 4 1 7 1Research & Development in th~e4 1 1 Physical, Engineering. & Life Sciences\nECY 030-31 Hanford (Rev. 3/5/04) Page 2 of 16\n Permit WA7890008967 Part III, Operating Unit Group 3\nLiquid Effluent Retention Facility & 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility, Rev. 4\nX. Other Environmental Permits (see instructions)\nA. Permit Type B. Permit Number C. Description\nE T S C A 0 3 -1 0 -2 2 TSCA approval, 40 CFR 761\n-1 2 7 40 CFR 761.61(c), TSCA risk-based approval\nE HC M 1 2003-10-22\nE A 0 P 0 0 -0 5 -0 0 6 Title V Air Operating Permit\nE D E 0 7 N W P -0 0 3 WAC173-400&-460Criteria&Toxicsapproval\n4 WAC 246-247 Radioactive Air Emissions approval,\nE F F 0 1 -1 6 LERF Basin 44, EU 146, AIR 12-305\nWAC 246-247 Radioactive Air Emissions approval,\nE F F -0 1 -1 4 7 LERF Basin 43, EU 147, AIR 12-305\nWAC 246-247 Radioactive Air Emissions approval,\nE F F -0 1 -1 4 8 LERF Basin 42, EU 148, AIR 12-305\nE F F -0 1 3 0 1 WAC 246-247 Radioactive Air Emissions approval,\nETF, EU 301, AIR 12-305\nWAC 173-216, State Waste Discharge Permit for the\nU S T 4 5 0 0 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility State-Approved\nLand Disposal Site\nWAC 173-216, State Waste Discharge Permit Program,U -S T 4 5 1 1 Sitewide Permit for miscellaneous streams\nXI. Nature of Business (provide a brief description that Includes both dangerous waste and non-dangerous\nwaste areas and activities)\nConstruction of the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility (LERF) began in 1990. Waste management\noperations began at LERF in April 1994. Construction of the 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF)\nbegan in 1992. Waste management operations began at ETF in November of 1995.\nThe LERF and ETF comprise an aqueous waste treatment system located in the 200 East Area that provides\nstorage and treatment for a variety of aqueous mixed waste. This aqueous waste includes process\ncondensate from the 242-A Evaporator and other aqueous waste generated from onsite remediation and\nwaste management activities.\nThe LERF consists of three lined surface impoundments, or basins. Aqueous waste from LERF is pumped\nto the ETF for treatment in a series of process units, or systems, that remove or destroy dangerous waste\nconstituents. The treated effluent is discharged to a State-Approved Land Disposal Site (SALDS) north of\nthe 200 West Area, under the authority of a Washington State Waste Discharge Permit (ST4500) and the\nFinal Delisting (40 CFR 261, Appendix IX, Table 2)\nSludge that accumulates in the bottoms of ETF process tanks is removed periodically and placed into\ncontainers. The waste is solidified by decanting the supernate from the container and the remainder of the\nliquid is allowed to evaporate, or absorbents are added, as necessary, to address the residual liquid. The\nprocess design capacity for treatment of waste in containers (TO4) is 18,927 liters per day.\nECY 030-31 Hanford (Rev. 3/5/04) Page 3 of 16\n Permit WA7890008967 Part Ill, Operating Unit Group 3\nLiquid Effluent Retention Facility & 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility, Rev. 4\nEXAMPLE FOR COMPLETING ITEMS XII and XIII (shown in lines numbered X-1, X-2, and X-3 below): A facility has\ntwo storage tanks that hold 1200 gallons and 400 gallons respectively. There is also treatment in tanks at 20 gallons/hr.\nFinally, a one-quarter acre area that is two meters deep will undergo in situ vitrification.\nSection XII. Process Codes and Design Section XIII. Other Process Codes\nCapacities Sectl_ n XII._Oe_ Prce__ Cde\nB. Process Design B. Process Design\nCapactity C. Capac1ty C.\nLine A. Process Process Line A. Process Process D ProcessNber Codes 2. Unit of Total Nuor Codes 2. Unit of Total r(enter code) I. Amount Measure Number (enter code) 1. Amount Measure Number\n(enter of Units (enter of Unitscode) code)\nIn situ\nX I S O 2 1,600 G 002 X I T 0 4 700 C 001 vitrificatio\nX 2 T 0 3 20 E 001\nX 3 T 0 4 700 C 001\n1 S 0 4 88,500,000 L 003 1 T 0 4 18,927 V 001 treamet\n2 T 0 2 88,500,000 V 003 2\n3 S 0 2 9,849,350 L 019 3\n4 T 0 1 817,646 V 019 4\n5 S 0 1 147,630 L 003 5\n6 T 0 4 18,927 V 001 6\n7 7\n8 8\n9 9\n10 1lj 0\n12 1 2\n13 1 3\n14 1 4\n15 11 5\n1 6 1 6\n17 1 7\n18 1 8\n19 1 9\n20 2 0\n2 1 2 1\n22 2 2\n23 2 3\n24 2 4\n25 2 5\nECY 030-31 Hanford (Rev. 3/5/04) Page 4 of 16\n Permit WA7890008967 Part III, Operating Unit Group 3\nLiquid Effluent Retention Facility & 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility, Rev. 4\nXIV. Description of Dangerous Wastes\nExample for completing this section: A facility will receive three non-listed wastes, then store and treat them on-site.\nTwo wastes are corrosive only, with the facility receiving and storing the wastes in. containers. There will be about 200\npounds per year of each of these two wastes, which will be neutralized in a tank. The other waste is corrosive and\nignitable and will be neutralized then blended into hazardous waste fuel. There will be about 100 pounds per year of that\nwaste, which will be received in bulk and put into tanks.\nA Dargerous B. Estimated C. Unit of D. Processes\nLine A.Dneos Annual Measure\nNu(ter cde Quantity of (enter (1) Process Codes (enter) (2) Process Description(etrcd) Waste code) [ if a code Is not entered In D (1)]\nX 1 D 0 2 400 P S 0 1 T 0 1\nX 2 D 0 0 1 100 P S 0 2 T 0 1\nX D 0 0 2 Included with above\nI D 0 0 1 106,940,410 K S 0 4 T 0 2\n2 DO 02 K SO4T0 2\n3 D 0 03 K S04T0 2\n4 D O 04 K S04T0 2\n5 D 0 05 K S04T0 2\n6D 0 0 6 K S0 4 TO 2\n7 D 0 07 K S04T0 2\n8D 0 08 K S04T0 2\n9D 0 0 9 K S04T0 2\n10 D 0 1 0 K S 0 4 T 0 2\n11 D 0 1 1 K S 0 4 T 0 2\n12 D 0 1 8 K S 0 4 T 0 2\n13 D 0 1 9 K S 0 4 T 0 2\n14 D 0 2 2 K S 0 4 T 0 2\n15 D 0 2 8 K S 0 4 T 0 2\n16 D 0 2 9 K S 0 4 T 0 2\n17 D 0 3 0 K S 0 4 T 0 2\n18 D 0 3 3 K S 0 4 T 0 2\n19 D 0 3 4. K S 0 4 T 0 2\n20 D 0 3 5 K S 0 4 T 0 2\n21 D 0 3 6 K S 0 4 T 0 2\n22 D 0 3 8 K S 0 4 T O 2\n23 D 0 3 9 K S 0 4 T 0 2\n24 D 0 4 0 K S 0 4 T 0 2\n25 D 0 4 1 K S 0 4 T 0 2\nECY 030-31 Hanford (Rev. 3/5/04) Page 5 of 16\n Permit WA7890008967 Part III, Operating Unit Group 3\nLiquid Effluent Retention Facility & 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility, Rev. 4\nEPA/StateID W A7 89000896 7Number\nContinuation of Section XIV. Descripticn of Dang rous Waste\nA Dangero B. Estimated C. Unit D. Process\nLine A.WanerNou. Annual of ________________\nNumber Wseo. Quantity of Measure ()PoesDs ito(enter code) Waste (eiter (1) Process Codes (enter) (2) acess De()]\n______ ___________ code) [If a code Is not entered In D (1)]\n26D 043 K S04T0 2\n27 F 0 01 K S04T0 2\n28 F 0 0 2 K S 0 4 T 0 2\n29 F 0 0 3 K S 0 4 T 0 2\n30 F 0 0 4 K S 0 4 T 0 2\n31 F 0 0 5 K S 0 4 T 0 2\n32 F 0 39 K S04T0 2\n33 W T 0 1 K S 0 4 T 0 2\n34 W T 0 2 K S 0 4 T 0 2\n35 U 2 10 K S04T0 2\n36 D 0 0 1 106,940,410 K T 0 1\n37 D 0 0 2 K T 0 1\n38 D 0 0 3 K T 0 1\n39 D 0 0 4 K T 0 1\n40 D 0 0 5 K T 0 1\n41 D 0 0 6 K T 0 1\n42 D 0 0 7 K T 0 1\n43 D 0 0 8 K T 0 1\n44 D 0 0 9 K T 0 1\n45 D 0 1 0 K T 0 1\n46 D 0 1 1 K T 0 1\n47 D 0 1 8 K T 0 1\n48 D 0 1 9 K T 0 1\n49 D 0 2 2 K T 0 1\n50 D 0 2 8 K T 0 1\n51 D 0 2 9 K T 0 1\n52 D 0 3 0 K T 0 1\n53 D 0 3 3 K T 0 1\n54 D 0 3 4 K T 0 1\n55 D 0 3 5 K T 0 1\nECY 030-31 Hanford (Rev. 3/5/04) Page 6 of 16\n Permit WA7890008967 Part [II, Operating Unit Group 3\nLiquid Effluent Retention Facility & 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility, Rev. 4\n56 D 0 3 6 K T 0 T\n57 D 0 3 8 K T 0 1\n58 D 0 3 9 K T 0 1\n59 D 0 4 0 K T 0 1\n60 D 0 4 1 K T 0 1\n61 D 0 4 3 K T 0 1\n62 F 0 0 1 K T 0 1\n63 F 0 0 2 K TO1\n64 F 0 0 3 K T 0 1\n65 F 0 04 K TOT\n66 F 0 0 5 K T 0 1\n67 F 0 39 K TO1\n68 W T 0 1 K T 0 1\n69 W T 0 2 K T 0 1\n70 U 2 1 0 K T 0 1\n71 D 0 0 1 106,940,410 K S 0 2\n72 D 0 0 2 K S 0 2\n73 D 0 0 3 K S 0 2\n74 D 0 0 4 K S 0 2\n75 D 0 0 5 K S 0 2\n76 D 0 0 6 K S 0 2\n77 D 0 0 7 K S 0 2\n78 D 0 0 8 K S 0 2\n'79 D O 0 9 K S0 2\n80 D 0 1 0 K S 0 2\n81 D 0 1 1 K S 0 2\n82 D 0 1 8 K S 0 2\n83 D 0 1 9 K S 0 2\n84 D 0 2 2 K S 0 2\n85 D 0 2 8 K S 0 2\nECY 030-31 Hanford (Rev. 3/5/04) Page 7 of 16\n Permit WA7890008967 Part III, Operating Unit Group 3\nLiquid Effluent Retention Facility & 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility, Rev. 4\n86 D 0 2 9 K S 0 2\n87 D 0 3 0 K S 0 2\n8 D 0 3 3 K S 0 2\n89 D 0 3 4 K S 0 2\n90 D 0 3 5 K S 0 2\n91 D 0 3 6 K S 0 2\n92 D 0 3 8 K S 0 2\n93 D 0 3 9 K S 0 2\n94 D 0 40 K S 02\n95 DO 41 K S02\n96 D 0 4 3 K S 0 2\n97 F 0 0 1 K S 0 2\n98 F 0 0 2 K S 0 2\n99 F 0 0 3 K S 0 2\n100 F 0 0 4 K S 0 2\n101 F 0 0 5 K S 0 2\n102 F 0 3 9 K S 0 2\n103 W T 0 1 K S 0 2\n104 W T 0 2 K S 0 2\n105 U 2 1 0 K S 0 2\n106 D 0 0 1 153,932 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n107 D 0 0 2 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n108 D 0 0 3 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n109 D 0 0 4 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n110 D 0 0 5 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n111 D 0 0 6 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n112 D 0 0 7 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n113 D 0 0 8 K S 0 1 includes Debris\n114 D 0 0 9 K S 0 1 IncludesDebris\n115 D 0 1 0 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n116 D 0 1 1 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\nECY 030-31 Hanford (Rev. 3/5/04) Page 8 of 16\n Permit WA7890008967 Part 11, Operating Unit Group 3\nLiquid Effluent Retention Facility & 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility, Rev. 4\n117 D 0 1 8 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n118 D 0 1 9 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n119 D 0 2 2 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n120 D 0 2 8 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n121 D 0 2 9 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n122 D 0 3 0 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n123 D 0 3 3 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n124 D 0 3 4 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n125 D 0 3 5 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n126 D 0 3 6 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n127 D 0 3 8 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n128 D 0 3 9 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n129 D 0 4 0 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n130 D 0 4 1 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n131 D 0 4 3 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n132' F 0 0 1 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n133 F 0 0 2 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n134 F 0 0 3 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n135 F 0 0 4 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n136 F 0 0 5 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n137 F 0 3 9 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n138 W T 0 1 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n139 W T 0 2 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n140 U 2 1 0 K S 0 1 Includes Debris\n141 D 0 0 1 81,310 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n142 D 0 0 2 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n143 D 0 0 3 -K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n144 D 0 0 4 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n145 D 0 0 5 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n146 D 0 0 6 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n147 D 0 0 7 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n148 D 0 0 8 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\nECY 030-31 Hanford (Rev. 3/5/04) Page 9 of 16\n Permit WA7890008967 Part 1ll, Operating Unit Group 3\nLiquid Effluent Retention Facility & 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility, Rev. 4\n149 D 0 0 9 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n150 D 0 1 0 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n151 D 0 1 1 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n152 D 0 1 8 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n153 D 0 1 9 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n154 D 0 2 2 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n155 D 0 2 8 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n156 D 0 2 9 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n157 D 0 3 0 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n158 D 0 3 3 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n159 D 0 3 4 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n160 D 0 3 5 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n161 D 0 3 6 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n162 D 0 3 8 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n163 D 0 3 9 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n164 D 0 4 0 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n1615 D 0 4 1 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n166 D 0 4 3 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n167 F 0 0 1 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n168 F 0 0 2 K T 0 4 IncludesDebris\n169 F 0 0 3 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n170 F 0 0 4 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n171 F 0 0 5 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n172 F 0 3 9 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n173 W T 0 1 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n174 W T 0 2 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n175 U 2 1 0 K T 0 4 Includes Debris\n176\n177\n178,\n179\n1801.\nECY 030-31 Hanford (Rev. 3/5/04) Page 10 of 16\n Permit WA7890008967 Part III, Operating Unit Group 3\nLiquid Effluent Retention Facility & 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility, Rev. 4\n181\n182\nS183\n184\nECY 030-31 Hanford (Rev. 3/5/04) Page ll of 16\n Permit WA7890008967 Part Ill, Operating Unit Group 3\nLiquid Effluent Retention Facility & 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility, Rev. 4\nXV. Map\nAttach to this application a topographic map of the area extending to at least one (1) mile beyond property boundaries. The\nmap must show the outline of the facility; the location of each of its existing and proposed intake and discharge structures;\neach of Its dangerous waste treatment, storage, recycling, or disposal units; and each well where fluids are injected\nunderground. Include all springs, rivers, and other surface water bodies In this map area, plus drinking water wells listed in\npublic records or otherwise known to the applicant within % mile of the facility property boundary. The Instructions provide\nadditional information on meeting these requirements.\nTopographic map is located in the Ecology Library\nXVI. Facility Drawing\nAll existing facilities must include a scale drawing of the facility (refer to Instructions for more detail).\nXVII. Photographs\nAll existing facilities must include photographs (aerial or ground-level) that clearly delineate all existing structures; existing\nstorage, treatment, recycling, and disposal areas; and sites of future storage, treatment, recycling, or disposal areas (refer to\nInstructions for more detail).\nXVIII. Certifications\nI certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or\nsupervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and\nevaluate the Information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or\nthose persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my\nknowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for\nsubmitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.\nOperator Signature Date Signed\nName and Official Title (type or print)\nKevin W. Smith, Manager\nU.S. Department of Energy\nOffice of River Protection\nCo-Operator* Sign Date Signed\nName and Official Title (type or print)\nL. David Olson 71e\nPresident and Project Manager\nWashington River Protection Solutions, LLC\nCo-Operator -Address and Telephone Number*\nP.O. Box 850\nRichland, WA 99352\n(509)372-9138\nFacility-Property Owner Sign ture Date Signed\nName and Official Title (type or print)\nKevin W. Smith, ?vlanager\nU.S. Department of Energy lj\nOffice of River Protection\nECY 030-31 Hanford (Rev. 3/5/04) Page 12 of 16\n Permit WA7890008967 Part Ill, Operating Unit Group 3\nLiquid Effluent Retention Facility & 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility, Rev. 4\nComments\nChanges from Revision 3A to 4\nSection V, \"Facility Mailing Address\"\n* Updated P.O. Box from 550 to 450.\nSection VI, \"Facility Contact\"\n* Updated from \"Matthew McCormick\" to \"Kevin Smith\".\n* Updated phone number of facility contact.\n* Updated P.O. Box address of facility contact.\nSection VII, \"Facility Operator Information, A. Name\"\n* Updated Owner/Operator phone number.\n* Updated Co-Operator name and phone number.\n* Updated P.O. Box addresses for Owner and Co-Operator.\nSection VII, \"Facility Operator Information, C\"\n* Updated schedule for transition date to 03/30/2015.\nSection VIII, \"Facility Owner Information, A. Name\"\n* Updated from \"Matthew S. McCormick\" to \"Kevin W. Smith\".\n* Updated phone number of facility owner.\n* Updated PO Box address of facility owner.\nSection XVIII, \"Certifications\"\n* Updated Operator from \"Matthew S. McCormick\" of\"Richland Operations Office\" to \"Kevin W. Smith\" of\n\"Office of River Protection\".\n* Updated Co-Operator from \"John C. Fulton\" of \"CH2M Hill Plateau Remediation Company\" to \"L. David\nOlson\" of Washington River Protection Solutions, LLC\".\n* Updated Co-Operator title from \"Chief Executive Officer\" to \"Project Manager\".\n* Updated Co-Operator P.O. Box address and phone number.\n* Updated Facility-Property Owner from \"Matthew S. McCormick\" of \"Richland Operations Office\" to \"Kevin\nW. Smith\" of \"Office of River Protection\".\nECY 030-31 Hanford (Rev. 3/5/04) Page 13 of 16\n Permit WA7890008967 Part III, Operating Unit Group 3\nLiquid Effluent Retention Facility & 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility, Rev. 4\nLiquid Effluid Effluent Retention Facility & 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility\nECY 030-31 Hanford (Rev. 3/5/04) Page 14 of 16\n Permit WA7890008967 Part III, Operating Unit Group 3\nLiquid Effluent Retention Facility & 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility, Rev. 4\nLiquid Effluent Retention Facility\nTypical Basin Photo Taken 1992\n200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility\nPhoto Taken 2005\nECY 030-31 Hanford (Rev. 3/5/04) Page 15 of 16\n Permit WA7890008967 Part III, Operating Unit Group 3\nLiquid Effluent Retention Facility & 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility, Rev. 4\nJ'\n200 AreaEI en ent FacilityEflu ean\nLiquid Effluent\nRetention Facility\n---- -\niv IN 11,OLudEffletRenn7 .-,,\n20 as re t.1 rintL ita.rrs,\nLiquid ~fluan~ Rtedtion CS111CC'!51 XCIt- I\n-JP\"'\nEffluelnte Treatmen Failt\nECY 030-31 Hanford (Rev. 3/5/04) Page 16 of 16\n I\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nADDENDUM B\nWASTE ANALYSIS PLAN\nAddendum B.i\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum B.ii\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1\n2 ADDENDUM B\n3 WASTE ANALYSIS PLAN\n4\n5\n6 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n7 B. WASTE ANALYSIS PLAN.................................................5\n8 B.1 Introduction......................................................... 6\n9 B. 1.1 Liquid Effluent Retention Facility and Effluent Treatment Facility Description .. ............7\n10 B.1.2 Sources of Aqueous Waste ................................... ................. 8\n11 B.2 Influent Waste Acceptance Process..................9.......... ............. 9\n12 B.2.1 Waste Information .................................................... 10\n13 B.2.2 Waste Management Decision Process ....................................... 12\n14 B.2.3 Periodic Review Process ................................................ 17\n15 B.2.4 Record/Information and Decision ................................ .......... 17\n16 B.3 Special Management Requirements............... ................ ......... 19\n17 B.3.1 Land Disposal Restriction Compliance at Liquid Effluent Retention Facility .. .............. 19\n18 B.4 Influent Aqueous Waste Sampling and Analysis.................................20\n19 B.4.1 Sampling Procedures .................................................. 20\n20 B.4.2 Analytical Rationale....................................... ............ 21\n21 B.5 Treated Effluent Sampling and Analysis ..................................... 22\n22 B.5.1 Rationale for Effluent Analysis Parameter Selection ................... .......... 22\n23 B.5.2 Effluent Sampling Strategy: Methods, Location, Analyses, and Frequency ..... ......... 23\n24 B.6 Effluent Treatment Facility Generated Waste Sampling and Analysis ....... ........... 23\n25 B.6.1 Secondary Waste Generated from Treatment Processes........................... 24\n26 B.6.2 Operations and Maintenance Waste Generated at the 200 Area Effluent Treatment\n27 Facility ............................................................ 27\n28 B.6.3 Other Waste Generated at the 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility...................28\n29 B.7 Quality Assurance/Quality Control..........................................29\n30 B.7.1 Project Management...................................................29\n31 B.7.2 Data Quality Parameters and Criteria........................................29\n32 B.7.3 Data Generation and Acquisition..........................................31\n33 B.7.4 Assessment and Oversight...............................................33\n34 B.7.5 Verification and Validation of Analytical Data................... .............. 33\n35 B.8 References..........................................................34\n36 B.9 Analytical Methods, Sample Containers, Preservative Methods, and Holding Times .................. 35\nAddendum B.iii\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 FIGURES\n2 Figure B. 1. 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility Floor Plan.............................................................. 11\n3\n4 TABLES\n5 Table B.1. General Limits for Liner Compatibility .................................... 18\n6 Table B.2. Waste Acceptance Criteria.................. .................... ..... 19\n7 Table B.3. Target Parameters for Influent Aqueous Waste Analyses......... ................. 22\n8 Table B.4. Rationale for Parameters to be Monitored in Treated Effluent ........... ........... 25\n9 Table B.5. 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility Generated Waste -Sampling and Analysis.............. 28\n10 Table B.6. Sample and Analysis Criteria for Influent Aqueous Waste and Treated Effluent................ 35\n11 Table B.7. Sample Containers, Preservative Methods, and Holding Times for 200 Area ETF\n12 Generated Waste................. ............................... 39\n13\nAddendum B.iv\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nB. WASTE ANALYSIS PLAN\n2 Metric Conversion Chart\nInto metric units Out of metric units\nIf you know Multiply by To get If you know Multiply by To get\nLength Length\ninches 25.40 millimeters millimeters 0.0393 inches\ninches 2.54 centimeters centimeters 0.393 inches\nfeet 0.3048 meters meters 3.2808 feet\nyards 0.914 meters meters 1.09 yards\nmiles 1.609 kilometers kilometers 0.62 miles\nArea Area\nsquare inches 6.4516 square square 0.155 square inches\ncentimeters centimeters\nsquare feet 0.092 square meters square meters 10.7639 square feet\nsquare yards 0.836 square meters square meters 1.20 square yards\nsquare miles 2.59 square square 0.39 square miles\nkilometers kilometers\nacres 0.404 hectares hectares 2.471 acres\nMass (weight) Mass (weight)\nounces 28.35 grams grams 0.0352 ounces\npounds 0.453 kilograms kilograms 2.2046 pounds\nshort ton 0.907 metric ton metric ton 1.10 short ton\nVolume Volume\nfluid ounces 29.57 milliliters milliliters 0.03 fluid ounces\nquarts 0.95 liters liters 1.057 quarts\ngallons 3.79 liters liters 0.26 gallons\ncubic feet 0.03 cubic meters cubic meters 35.3147 cubic feet\ncubic yards 0.76456 cubic meters cubic meters 1.308 cubic yards\nTemperature Temperature\nFahrenheit subtract 32 Celsius Celsius multiply by Fahrenheit\nthen 9/5ths, then\nmultiply by add 32\n5/9ths\nForce Force\npounds per 6.895 kilopascals kilopascals 1.4504 x pounds per\nsquare inch 10 square inch\n3 Source: Engineering Unit Conversions, M. R. Lindeburg, P.E., Second Ed., 1990, Professional\n4 Publications, Inc., Belmont, California.\n5\nAddendum B.5\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI B.1 Introduction\n2 In accordance with the regulations set forth in the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology)\n3 Dangerous Waste Regulations, Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-303-300, this waste\n4 analysis plan (WAP) has been prepared for operation of the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility (LERF)\n5 and the 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility (200 Area ETF) located in the 200 East Area on the Hanford\n6 Site, Richland, Washington.\n7 The purpose of this WAP is to ensure that adequate knowledge as defined in WAC 173-303-040, is\n8 obtained for dangerous and/or mixed waste accepted by and managed in LERF and 200 Area ETF. This\n9 WAP documents the sampling and analytical methods, and describes the procedures used to obtain this\n10 knowledge. This WAP also documents the requirements for generators sending aqueous waste to the\n11 LERF or 200 Area ETF for treatment. Throughout this WAP, the term generator includes any Hanford\n12 Site source, including treatment, storage, and disposal (TSD) units, whose process produces an aqueous\n13 waste.\n14 LERF consists of three surface impoundments, which provide treatment and storage. The 200 Area ETF\n15 includes a tank system, which provides treatment and storage, and a container management area, which\n16 provides container storage and treatment. Additionally, this WAP discusses the sampling and analytical\n17 methods for the treated effluent (treated aqueous waste) that is discharged from 200 Area ETF as a\n18 non-dangerous, delisted waste to the State Approved Land Disposal Site (SALDS). Specifically, the\n19 WAP contains sampling and analysis requirements including quality assurance/quality control\n20 requirements, for the following:\n21 * Influent Waste Acceptance Process -determines the acceptability of a particular aqueous waste\n22 at the LERF or 200 Area ETF pursuant to applicable Permit conditions, regulatory requirements,\n23 and operating capabilities prior to acceptance of the waste at the LERF or 200 Area ETF for\n24 treatment or storage. This includes documenting that wastes accepted for treatment at ETF are\n25 within the treatability envelope required by the Final Delisting 200 Area ETF, Permit Condition\n26 1.a.i. Refer to Section B.2.\n27 * Special Management Requirements -identifies the special management requirements for\n28 aqueous wastes managed in the LERF or 200 Area ETF. Refer to Section B.3.\n29 * Influent Aqueous Waste Sampling and Analysis -describes influent sampling and analyses\n30 used to characterize an influent aqueous waste to ensure proper management of the waste and for\n31 compliance with the special management requirements. Also includes rationale for analyses.\n32 Refer to Section B.4.\n33 * Treated Effluent Sampling and Analysis -describes sampling and analyses of treated effluent\n34 (i.e., treated aqueous waste) for compliance with Washington State Waste Discharge Permit,\n35 No. ST 4500 (Ecology 2000); and Final Delisting 200 Area ETF 40 CFR 261, Appendix IX,\n36 Table 2 and the corresponding State Final Delisting issued pursuant to WAC 173-303-910(3)\n37 limits. Also includes rationale for analyses. Refer to Section B.5.\n38 * 200 Area ETF Generated Waste Sampling and Analysis -describes the sampling and analyses\n39 used to characterize the secondary waste streams generated from the treatment process and to\n40 characterize waste generated from maintenance and operations activities. Also includes rationale\n41 for analyses. Characterization and designation of wastes generated from maintenance and\n42 operations activities are conducted pursuant to WAC 173-303-170 and are not subject to the\n43 permit requirements of WAC 173-303-800. These descriptions are included in this WAP for\n44 purposes of completeness, but are not enforceable conditions of this WAP or the permit. Refer to\n45 Section B.6.\n46 * Quality Assurance and Quality Control -ensures the accuracy and precision of sampling and\n47 analysis activities. Refer to Section B.7.\nAddendum B.6\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI This WAP meets the specific requirements of the following:\n2 * Land Disposal Restrictions Treatment Exemption for the LERF under 40 CFR 268.4,\n3 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), December 6, 1994 (EPA 1994).\n4 * Final Delisting 200 Area ETF [40 CFR 261, Appendix IX, Table 2.\n5 * Corresponding State Final Delisting issued pursuant to WAC 173-303-910(3).\n6 * Washington State Waste Discharge Permit (No. ST 4500), as amended.\n7 * Hanford Facility Dangerous Waste Permit (Permit) WA7890008967, as amended.\n8 The Permit conditions of the Washington State Waste Discharge Permit (No. ST 4500) are included in\n9 this WAP for completeness, as well as generator requirements for designation of wastes generated by\n10 LERF and 200 Area ETF from operation and maintenance activities. The Washington State Waste\n11 Discharge Permit (No. ST 4500) Conditions are not within the scope of Resource Conservation and\n12 Recovery Act (RCRA) or WAC 173-303 or subject to the permit requirements of WAC 173-303-800.\n13 Therefore, revisions of this WAP that are not governed by the requirements of WAC 173-303 will not be\n14 considered as a modification subject to review or approval by Ecology. Any other revisions to this WAP\n15 will be incorporated through the Permit modification process as necessary to demonstrate compliance\n16 with requirements of this Permit, including Permit Conditions I.E.7 and I.E.8.\n17 B.1.1 Liquid Effluent Retention Facility and Effluent Treatment Facility Description\n18 The LERF and 200 Area ETF comprise an aqueous waste treatment system located in the 200 East Area.\n19 Both LERF and 200 Area ETF may receive aqueous waste through several inlets. 200 Area ETF can\n20 receive aqueous waste through three inlets. First, 200 Area ETF can receive aqueous waste directly from\n21 the LERF. Second, aqueous waste can be transferred from the Load-in Station to 200 Area ETF. Third,\n22 aqueous waste can be transferred from containers (e.g., carboys, drums) to the 200 Area ETF through\n23 either the Secondary Waste Receiving Tanks or the Concentrate Tanks. The Load-in Station is located\n24 just east of 200 Area ETF and currently consists of three storage tanks and a pipeline that connects to\n25 either LERF or 200 Area ETF through fiberglass pipelines with secondary containment.\n26 The LERF can receive aqueous waste through four inlets. First, aqueous waste can be transferred to\n27 LERF through a dedicated pipeline from the 200 West Area. Second, aqueous waste can be transferred\n28 through a pipeline that connects LERF with the 242-A Evaporator. Third, aqueous waste also can be\n29 transferred to LERF from a pipeline that connects LERF to the Load-in Station at 200 Area ETF. Finally,\n30 aqueous waste can be transferred into LERF through a series of sample ports located at each basin.\n31 The LERF consists of three lined surface impoundments with a nominal capacity of 29.5 million liters\n32 each. Aqueous waste from LERF is pumped to 200 Area ETF through a double walled fiberglass\n33 pipeline. The pipeline is equipped with leak detection located in the annulus between the inner and outer\n34 pipes. Each basin is equipped with six available sample risers constructed of 6-inch-perforated pipe. A\n35 seventh sample riser in each basin is dedicated to influent waste receipt piping, and an eighth riser in each\n36 basin contains liquid level instrumentation. Each riser extends along the sides of each basin from the top\n37 to the bottom of the basin. Detailed information on the construction and operation of the LERF is\n38 provided in Addendum C, Process Information.\n39 200 Area ETF is designed to treat the contaminants anticipated in process condensate from the\n40 242-A Evaporator and other aqueous wastes from the Hanford Site. Section B.1.2 provides more\n41 information on the sources of these wastes.\n42 The capabilities of 200 Area ETF were confirmed through pilot plant testing. A pilot plant was used to\n43 test surrogate solutions that contained constituents of concern anticipated in aqueous wastes on the\n44 Hanford Site. The pilot plant testing served as the basis for a demonstration of the treatment capabilities\n45 of 200 Area ETF in the 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility Delisting Petition (DOE/RL-92-72).\n46 200 Area ETF consists of a primary and a secondary treatment train (Figure B.1). The primary treatment\n47 train removes or destroys dangerous and mixed waste components from the aqueous waste.\nAddendum B.7\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI In the secondary treatment train, the waste components are concentrated and dried into a powder. This\n2 waste is containerized, and transferred to a waste treatment, storage, and/or disposal (TSD) unit.\n3 Each treatment train consists of a series of operations. The primary treatment train includes the\n4 following:\n5 * Surge tank\n6 * Filtration\n7 * Ultraviolet light oxidation (UV/OX)\n8 * pH adjustment\n9 * Hydrogen peroxide decomposition\n10 * Degasification\n11 * Reverse osmosis (RO)\n12 * Ion exchange\n13 * Final pH adjustment and verification\n14 The secondary treatment train uses the following:\n15 * Secondary waste receiving\n16 * Evaporation (with mechanical vapor recompression)\n17 * Concentrate staging\n18 * Thin film drying\n19 * Container handling\n20 * Supporting systems\n21 A dry powder waste is generated from the secondary treatment train, from the treatment of an aqueous\n22 waste. The secondary waste treatment system typically receives and processes by-products generated\n23 from the primary treatment train. However, in an alternate operating scenario, some aqueous wastes may\n24 be fed to the secondary treatment train before the primary treatment train.\n25 The treated effluent is contained in verification tanks where the effluent is sampled to confirm that the\n26 effluent meets the delisting criteria. Under 40 CFR 261, Appendix IX, Table 2, the treated effluent from\n27 200 Area ETF is considered a delisted waste; that is, the treated effluent is no longer a listed dangerous\n28 waste subject to the hazardous waste management requirements of RCRA provided that the delisting\n29 criteria are satisfied and the treated effluent does not exhibit a dangerous characteristic. The treated\n30 effluent is discharged under the Washington State Waste Discharge Permit (No. ST 4500) as a\n31 nondangerous, delisted waste to the SALDS, located in the 600 Area, north of the 200 West Area. A\n32 portion of the treated wastewater from the Verification Tanks is recycled as service water throughout the\n33 facility; for example, it is used to dilute bulk acid and caustic to meet processing needs, thereby reducing\n34 the demand for process water.\n35 B.1.2 Sources of Aqueous Waste\n36 200 Area ETF was intended and designed to treat a variety of mixed wastes. However, process\n37 condensate from the 242-A Evaporator was the only mixed waste initially identified for storage and\n38 treatment in the LERF and 200 Area ETF. As cleanup activities at Hanford progress, many of the\n39 aqueous wastes generated from site remediation and waste management activities are sent to the LERF\n40 and 200 Area ETF for treatment and storage. A brief discussion of waste streams that may be managed\n41 by LERF and 200 Area ETF in the future may be found in the 200 Area ETF Delisting Petition\n42 (DOE/RL-92-97).\nAddendum B.8\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 Prior to management of any new waste streams, it may be necessary to modify this WAP through the\n2 permit modification process to ensure that adequate knowledge of such new waste streams is available\n3 prior to management of them in LERF and 200 Area ETF.\n4 The 242-A process condensate is a dangerous waste because it is derived from a listed, dangerous waste\n5 stored in the Double-Shell Tank (DST) System. The DST waste is transferred to the 242-A Evaporator\n6 where the waste is concentrated through an evaporation process. The concentrated slurry waste is\n7 returned to the DST System, and the evaporated portion of the waste is recondensed, collected, and\n8 transferred as process condensate to the LERF.\n9 Other aqueous wastes that are treated and stored at the LERF and 200 Area ETF include, but are not\n10 limited to the following Hanford wastes:\n11 * Contaminated groundwater from pump-and-treat remediation activities such as groundwater from\n12 the 200-UP-1 Operable Unit.\n13 * Purgewater from groundwater monitoring activities.\n14 * Water from deactivation activities, such as water from the spent fuel storage basins at deactivated\n15 reactors (e.g., N Reactor).\n16 * Laboratory aqueous waste from unused samples and sample analyses.\n17 * Leachate from landfills, such as the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility.\n18 * Any dilute waste, which may be accepted for treatment and within the scope of wastewaters that\n19 maybe delisted under terms of the revised delisting (40 CFR 261, Appendix IX, Table 2).\n20 Most of these aqueous wastes are accumulated in batches in a LERF basin for interim storage and\n21 treatment through pH and flow equalization before final treatment in 200 Area ETF. However, some\n22 aqueous wastes, such as 200-UP-I Groundwater, maybe treated on a flow through basis in LERF en route\n23 to 200 Area ETF for final treatment. The constituents in these aqueous wastes are common to the\n24 Hanford Site and were considered in pilot plant testing or in vendor tests, either as a constituent or as a\n25 family of constituents. According to the 200 Area ETF Delisting, Permit Condition 1.a.i, all wastes\n26 accepted for treatment at 200 Area ETF must be within a specified treatability envelope that ensures that\n27 wastes will be within the treatment capability of 200 Area ETF.\n28 B.2 Influent Waste Acceptance Process\n29 Throughout the acceptance process, there are specific criteria required for an influent waste (i.e., aqueous\n30 waste) to be accepted at the LERF and/or 200 Area ETF. These criteria are identified in the following\n31 sections and summarized in Table B.2. The process of accepting a waste into the LERF and 200 Area\n32 ETF systems involves a series of steps, as follows.\n33 * Waste information: The generator of an aqueous waste works with LERF and 200 Area ETF\n34 personnel to provide characterization data of the waste stream (Section B.2.1).\n35 * Waste management decision process: LERF and 200 Area ETF management decision is based\n36 on a case-by-case evaluation of whether an aqueous waste stream is acceptable for treatment or\n37 storage at LERF and the 200 Area ETF. The evaluation has two categories:\n38 o Regulatory acceptability: a review to determine if there are any, regulatory concerns that\n39 would prohibit the storage or treatment of an aqueous waste in the LERF or 200 Area ETF;\n40 e.g., treatment would meet permit conditions that would comply with applicable regulations.\n41 o Operational acceptability: an evaluation to determine if there are any operational concerns\n42 that would prohibit the storage or treatment of an aqueous waste in the LERF or 200 Area\n43 ETF and storage of treatment residuals; e.g., determine treatability and compatibility or safety\n44 considerations (Section B.2.2.2).\nAddendum B.9\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 B.2.1 Waste Information\n2 When an aqueous waste stream is identified for treatment or storage in the LERF or 200 Area ETF, the\n3 generator is required to characterize the waste stream according to the requirements in Section B.2. 1.1\n4 and document the results of characterization on an aqueous waste profile sheet. This requirement is the\n5 first waste acceptance criterion.\n6 The LERF and 200 Area ETF personnel work with the generators to ensure that the necessary information\n7 is collected for the characterization of a waste stream (i.e., the appropriate analyses or adequate\n8 knowledge), and that the information provided on the waste profile sheet is complete. The completed\n9 waste profile sheet is maintained in the Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF and 200 Area ETF File\n10 according to Permit Condition II.I.1.j.\n11 B.2.1.1 Waste Characterization\n12 Because the constituents in the individual aqueous waste streams vary, each waste stream is characterized\n13 and evaluated for acceptability on a case-by-case basis. The generator is required to designate an aqueous\n14 waste, which generally will be based on analytical data. However, a generator may use knowledge to\n15 substantiate the waste designation, or for general characterization information. Examples of acceptable\n16 knowledge include the following:\n17 * Documented data or information on processes similar to that which generated the aqueous waste\n18 stream\n19 * Information/documentation that the waste stream is from specific, well documented processes,\n20 e.g., F-listed wastes\n21 * Information/documentation that sampling/analyzing a waste stream would pose health and safety\n22 risks to personnel\n23 * Information/documentation that the waste stream does not lend itself to collecting a laboratory\n24 sample for example, wastewater collected (e.g., sump, tank) where the source water\n25 characterization is documented. Typically, these circumstances occur at decommissioned\n26 buildings or locations, not at operating units.\n27 When a generator performs characterization of a dangerous and/or mixed waste stream based on\n28 knowledge, LERF and 200 Area ETF personnel review the knowledge as part of the waste acceptance\n29 process to ensure the knowledge satisfies the definition of knowledge in WAC 173-303-040. Specifically,\n30 LERF and 200 Area ETF personnel review the generator's processes to verify the integrity of the\n31 knowledge, and determine whether the knowledge is current and consistent with requirements of this is\n32 WAP. LERF and 200 Area ETF management or their designee determines the final decision on the\n33 adequacy of the knowledge. The persons reviewing generator process knowledge and those making\n34 decisions on the adequacy of knowledge are trained according to the requirements of Addendum G,\n35 Personnel Training.\n36\nAddendum B.10\n eank Compressor\nFilled Container Storage Area OFed SeaO\nTruck Bay Spray Sump Tank - Water\nSCondenser u-2 Tank\n-4 No, I\nDryer Boiler Concentrate Tanks Secondary Waste Surge Tank\nryrR ceivng Tanks Eaoao\nThin Film-\nDryer (C\nN Rough0 Polishers Fine Fitter FSrg01 FitterFt SurgeContainer Fitei*Tank\nHandling Cnan s UVXEvaporator Pumps\n(D Room Conveyors Concentrae er Boiler ....... ........\nRoomuConcentrate s Secondary Waste Inlet Cooler - Unit\nCirculation Pumps Receiving Tank Pumps Building\nRD --at ------ Peroxide Decomposer wall( Second RO First RO\nRO Feed Second Cleaning Feed Degasification pH Adjustment Tank\npH Tank RO Stage Agent Feed Tank Column 4% Sodum\nEffluent pH q _'NO System d 64%Soiu\ntAdjuspet [ y UVOX Hydoxide\nZ;Tank Ei [l*[/nt Tn Hydroxide Tank\nEffluent pScdDOegasification Dute\n3 IBlower\nEffluent pH Se[ RO Ae e Chical\nA n ped Tank Sg dnk Degasicaton p Ad sment e\nPumps Pink RD Sta /pumps Tank Pumps Ttorage Reverse Osmosis System Degasification 4n Su urc AS\nColumn Inlet Cooler Acid Tank\nReturn Primary\nPunip -b. HEA HP Acrces s1 Hot\n-Dichage~~J IProcess Elctricl Mnaac\nPs g AataegH Floor Laboratory -Instrumenttlion Maintance\n0 up L Mitenance Area So\nSubterminal StasRSeal\n-tal Poa = Located on Mezzanine\njig ________________ n_______________________ HEP = High-efficiency\nSump Tank No. 2 Carboi filters particulate air\nRO = reverse osmosis\nUV/OX ultraviolet oxidation\nNote: Major processes0\nshown in italics a\nCHPRC0910-43 I 0,\n0092%~IT Sufui Sorg\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 The generator is also responsible for identifying Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) treatment standards\n2 applicable to the influent aqueous waste as part of the characterization, as required under 40 CFR 268.40\n3 incorporated by reference by WAC 173-303-140. Because the 200 Area ETF main treatment train is a\n4 Clean Water Act, equivalent treatment unit [40 CFR 268.37(a)] incorporated by reference by\n5 WAC 173-303-140, generators are not required to identify underlying hazardous constituents for\n6 characteristic wastes pursuant to 40 CFR 268.9, incorporated by reference by WAC 173-303-140, for\n7 wastewaters (i.e., <1 percent total suspended solids and <1 percent total organic carbon). The 200 Area\n8 ETF secondary waste (e.g., powder) reflects a change in LDR treatability group (i.e., wastewater to non-\n9 wastewater) so there is a new LDR point of generation, at which point any characteristic and associated\n10 underlying hazardous constituents must be identified. Therefore, generators of a non-wastewater may be\n11 required to identify underlying hazardous constituents for characteristic wastes pursuant to 40 CFR 268.9,\n12 incorporated by reference by WAC 173-303-140.\n13 When analyzing an aqueous waste stream for LERF and 200 Area ETF waste acceptance characterization,\n14 a generator is required to use the target list of parameters identified in Table B.3, of this WAP. This\n15 requirement is in addition to any analysis required for purposes of designation under WAC 173-303-070.\n16 These data are used by LERF and 200 Area ETF to verify the treatability of an aqueous waste stream, and\n17 to develop a treatment plan for the waste after acceptance. Refer to Table B.6, for the corresponding\n18 analytical methods. The generator may use knowledge in lieu of some analyses, as determined by LERF\n19 and 200 Area ETF management or their designee, if the knowledge satisfies the definition of knowledge\n20 in WAC 173-303-040. For example if a generator provides information that the process generating an\n21 aqueous waste does not include or involve organic chemicals, analyses for organic compounds likely\n22 would not be required. Additional analyses could be required if historical information and/or knowledge\n23 indicate that an aqueous waste contains constituents not included in the target list of parameters.\n24 The characterization and historical information are documented in the waste profile sheet, which is\n25 discussed in the following section and is part of the Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF and\n26 200 Area ETF File according to Permit Condition 11.1.\n27 B.2.1.2 Aqueous Waste Profile Sheet\n28 The waste profile sheet documents the characterization of each new aqueous waste stream. The profile\n29 includes a detailed description of the source, volume, waste designation and applicable LDR treatment\n30 standards, and physical nature (wastewater or non-wastewater) of the aqueous waste. For an aqueous\n31 waste to be accepted for treatment or storage in the LERF or 200 Area ETF, each new waste stream\n32 generator is required to complete and provide this form to LERF and 200 Area ETF management. Each\n33 generator also is required to provide the analytical data and/or knowledge used to designate the aqueous\n34 waste stream according to WAC 173-303-070 and to determine the chemical and physical nature of the\n35 waste.\n36 The LERF and ETF management determine whether the information on the waste profile sheet is\n37 sufficient according to the criteria above. The LERF and 200 Area ETF management use this information\n38 to evaluate the acceptability of the aqueous waste stream for storage and treatment in the LERF and\n39 200 Area ETF, and to determine if the secondary waste generated from treatment is acceptable for storage\n40 at the 200 Area ETF and has a defined path forward to final disposal.\n41 B.2.2 Waste Management Decision Process\n42 All aqueous waste under consideration for acceptance must be characterized using analytical data and/or\n43 knowledge. This information is used to determine the acceptability of an aqueous waste stream. The\n44 LERF and 200 Area ETF Facility Manager or their designee is responsible for making the decision to\n45 accept or reject an aqueous waste stream. The management decision to accept any aqueous waste stream\n46 is based on an evaluation of regulatory acceptability and operational acceptability. Each evaluation uses\n47 acceptance criteria, which were developed to ensure that an aqueous waste is managed in a safe,\n48 environmentally sound, and in compliance with this Permit. The following sections provide detail on the\n49 acceptance evaluation and the acceptance criteria.\nAddendum B.12\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 An aqueous waste stream could be rejected for one of the following reasons:\n2 * The paperwork and/or laboratory analyses from the generator are insufficient\n3 * Discrepancies with the regulatory and operational acceptance criteria cannot be reconciled,\n4 including:\n5 o An aqueous waste is not allowed under the current Washington State Waste Discharge Permit\n6 (No. ST 4500) or 200 Area ETF Delisting, and LERF and 200 Area ETF management elect\n7 not to pursue an amendment, or the Permit and Delisting cannot be amended\n8 (Section B.2.2.1)\n9 o An aqueous waste is incompatible with LERF liner materials or with other aqueous waste in\n10 LERF and no other management method is available (Section B.2.2.2.2).\n11 * Adequate storage or treatment capacity is not available.\n12 B.2.2.1 Regulatory Acceptability\n13 Each aqueous waste stream is evaluated on a case-by-case basis to determine if there are any regulatory\n14 concerns that would preclude the storage or treatment of a waste in the LERF or 200 Area ETF based on\n15 the criteria in Sections B2.2.1.1 and B.2.2.1.2. Before an aqueous waste can be stored or treated in either\n16 the LERF or 200 Area ETF, the waste designation must be determined. Information on the waste\n17 designation of an aqueous waste is documented in the waste profile sheet. This information is used to\n18 confirm that treating or storing the aqueous waste in the LERF or 200 Area ETF is allowed under and in\n19 compliance with WAC 173-303, Permit (WA7890008967), 200 Area ETF Delisting in 40 CFR 261,\n20 Appendix IX, Table 2, the corresponding State-Issued Delisting, and the Washington State Waste\n21 Discharge Permit (No. ST 4500) for 200 Area ETF.\n22 B.2.2.1.1 Dangerous Waste Regulations, State and Federal Delisting Actions, and\n23 Permits\n24 Before an aqueous waste stream is sent to the LERF or 200 Area ETF, the generator will characterize and\n25 designate the stream with the appropriate dangerous/hazardous waste numbers according to\n26 WAC 173-303-070. Addendum A, the 200 Area ETF Delisting and the corresponding State-Issued\n27 Delisting identify the specific waste numbers for dangerous/mixed waste that can be managed in the\n28 LERF and 200 Area ETF. Dangerous waste designated with waste numbers not specified in these\n29 documents cannot be treated or stored in the LERF or 200 Area ETF, unless the documents are\n30 appropriately modified.\n31 Additionally, aqueous wastes designated with listed waste numbers identified in the 200 Area ETF\n32 Delisting and the corresponding State-Issued Delisting will be managed in accordance with the conditions\n33 of the delisting, or an amended delisting.\n34 B.2.2.1.2 State Waste Permit Regulations/Permit\n35 Compliance with the Washington State Waste Discharge Permit (No. ST 4500), constitutes another waste\n36 acceptance criterion. In accordance with the permit conditions of the Washington State Waste Discharge\n37 Permit (No. ST 4500), the constituents of concern in each new aqueous waste stream must be identified.\n38 The waste designation and characterization data provided by the generator are used to identify these\n39 constituents. The Washington State Waste Discharge Permit (No. ST 4500), defines a constituent of\n40 concern in an aqueous waste stream, under the conditions of the Discharge Permit, as any contaminant\n41 with a maximum concentration greater than one of the following:\n42 * Any limit in the Washington State Waste Discharge Permit (No. ST 4500)\n43 * Groundwater Quality Criteria (WAC 173-200)\n44 * Final Delisting level (40 CFR 261, Appendix IX, Table 2)\n45 * The corresponding State-Issued Delisting\nAddendum B.13\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n* Background groundwater concentration as measured at the SALDS disposal site. The practical\n2 quantification limit (PQL) is used for the groundwater background concentration for constituents\n3 not analyzed or not detected in the SALDs background data.\n4 The Permit conditions of the Washington State Waste Discharge Permit (No. ST 4500), also require a\n5 demonstration that 200 Area ETF can treat the constituents of concern to below discharge limits.\n6 B.2.2.2 Operational Acceptability\n7 Because the operating configuration or operating parameters at the LERF and 200 Area ETF can be\n8 adjusted or modified, most aqueous waste streams generated on the Hanford Site can be effectively\n9 treated to below Delisting and Discharge Permit limits. Because of this flexibility, it would be\n10 impractical to define numerical acceptance or decision limits. Such limits would constrain the acceptance\n11 of appropriate aqueous waste streams for treatment at the LERF and 200 Area ETF. The versatility of the\n12 LERF and 200 Area ETF is better explained in the following examples:\n13 * The typical operating configuration of 200 Area ETF is to process an aqueous waste through the\n14 UV/OX unit first, followed by the RO unit. However, high concentrations of nitrates may\n15 interfere with the performance of the UV/OX. In this case, 200 Area ETF could be configured to\n16 process the waste in the RO unit prior to the JV/OX unit.\n17 * For a small volume aqueous waste with high concentrations of some anions and metals, the\n18 approach may be to first process the waste stream in the secondary treatment train. This approach\n19 would prevent premature fouling or scaling of the RO unit. The liquid portion (i.e., untreated\n20 overheads from 200 Area ETF evaporator and thin film dryer) would be sent to the primary\n21 treatment train.\n22 * An aqueous waste with high concentrations of chlorides and fluorides may cause corrosion\n23 problems when concentrated in the secondary treatment train. One approach is to adjust the\n24 corrosion control measures in the secondary treatment train. An alternative may be to blend this\n25 aqueous waste in a LERF basin with another aqueous waste, which has sufficient dissolved\n26 solids, such that the concentration of the chlorides in the secondary treatment train would not\n27 pose a corrosion concern.\n28 * Some metal salts (e.g., barium sulfate) tend to scale the RO membranes. In this situation,\n29 descalants used in the treatment process may be increased.\n30 * Any effluent that does not meet these limits in one pass through 200 Area ETF treatment process\n31 is recycled to 200 Area ETF for re-processing.\n32 There are some aqueous wastes, whose chemical and physical properties preclude that waste from being\n33 treated or stored at the LERF or 200 Area ETF. Accordingly, an aqueous waste is evaluated to determine\n34 if it is treatable, if it would impair the efficiency or integrity of the LERF or 200 Area ETF, and if it is\n35 compatible with materials in these units. This evaluation also determines if the aqueous waste is\n36 compatible with other aqueous wastes managed in the LERF.\n37 The waste acceptance criteria in this category focus on determining treatability of an aqueous waste\n38 stream, and on determining any operational concerns that would prohibit the storage or treatment of an\n39 aqueous waste stream in the LERF or 200 Area ETF. The chemical and physical properties of an aqueous\n40 waste stream are determined as part of the waste characterization, and are documented on the waste\n41 profile sheet and compared to the design of the units to determine whether an aqueous waste stream is\n42 appropriate for storage and treatment in the LERF and 200 Area ETF. All decisions and supporting\n43 rationale and data will be documented in the Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF and 200 Area\n44 ETF File according to Permit Condition 11.1.\n45 B.2.2.3 Special Requirements Pertaining to Land Disposal Restrictions\n46 Containers of 200 Area ETF secondary waste are transferred to a storage or final disposal unit, as\n47 appropriate (e.g., the Central Waste Complex or to the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility).\nAddendum B.14\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 200 Area ETF personnel provide the analytical characterization data and necessary process knowledge for\n2 the waste to be managed by the receiving staff, and the appropriate LDR documentation.\n3 The following information on the secondary waste is included on the LDR documentation provided to the\n4 receiving unit:\n5 * Dangerous waste numbers (as applicable)\n6 * Determination on whether the waste is restricted from land disposal according to the requirements\n7 of 40 CFR 268 incorporated by reference by WAC 173-303-140 (i.e., the LDR status of the\n8 waste)\n9 The waste tracking information associated with the transfer of waste\n10 * Waste analysis results.\n11 Generally, the operating parameters or operating configuration at the LERF or 200 Area ETF can be\n12 adjusted or modified to accommodate these properties. However, in those cases where a treatment\n13 process or operating configuration cannot be modified, the aqueous waste stream will be excluded from\n14 treatment or storage at the LERF or 200 Area ETF. Additionally, an aqueous waste stream is evaluated\n15 for the potential to deposit solids in a LERF basin (i.e., whether an aqueous waste contains sludge or\n16 could precipitate solids). This evaluation will also consider whether the blending or mixing of two or\n17 more aqueous waste streams will result in the formation of a precipitate. However, because the waste\n18 streams managed in the LERF and 200 Area ETF are generally dilute, the potential for mixing waste\n19 streams and forming a precipitate is low; no specific compatibility tests are performed. Filtration at the\n20 waste source could be required before acceptance into LERF. Waste streams with the potential to form\n21 precipitates in LERF or that cannot be blended with other waste streams to avoid precipitate formation are\n22 not accepted for treatment at LERF and 200 Area ETF. The Load-in Facility has the ability to perform\n23 filtration on incoming waste streams going to both the LERF and 200 Area ETF Load in. See additional\n24 discussions of precipitate formation and compliance with LDR requirements in Section B.3. Similar\n25 filtration requirements could apply to aqueous waste fed directly to 200 Area ETF without interim\n26 treatment in LERF.\n27 To determine if an aqueous waste meets the criterion of treatability, specific information is required.\n28 Treatability of a waste stream is evaluated from characterization data provided by the generator as\n29 verified through the waste acceptance process, the 200 Area waste acceptance criteria, and the treatability\n30 envelope for the 200 Area ETF as documented in Tables C.1 and C.2 of the November 29, 2001 delisting\n31 petition. Generators will also provide characterization data to identify those physical and chemical\n32 properties that would interfere with, or foul 200 Area ETF treatment process in consultation with LERF\n33 and 200 Area ETF representatives. In some instances, knowledge that meets the definition of knowledge\n34 in WAC 173-303-040 is used for purposes of identifying a chemical or physical property that would be of\n35 concern. For example, the generator could provide knowledge that the stream has two phases (an oily\n36 phase and an aqueous phase). In this case, if the generator could not physically separate the two phases,\n37 the aqueous waste stream would be rejected because the oily phase could compromise some of the\n38 treatment equipment. Typically, analyses for the following parameters are required to evaluate\n39 treatability and operational concerns:\n* total dissolved solids * barium * nitrite\n* total organic carbon * calcium * phosphate\n* total suspended solids * chloride * potassium\n* specific conductivity * fluoride * silicon\n* pH * iron * sodium\n* alkalinity * magnesium * sulfate\n* ammonia * nitrate\nAddendum B.15\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI These constituents are identified in Table B.2, which is the list of target analytes used for waste\n2 characterization and waste acceptance evaluation.\n3 B.2.2.3.1 Compatibility\n4 Corrosion Control. Because of the materials of construction used in 200 Area ETF, corrosion is\n5 generally not a concern with new aqueous waste streams. Additionally, these waste streams are managed\n6 in a manner that minimizes corrosion. To ensure that a waste will not compromise the integrity of\n7 200 Area ETF tanks and process equipment, each waste stream is assessed for its corrosion potential as\n8 part of the compatibility evaluation. This assessment usually focuses on chloride and fluoride\n9 concentrations; however, the chemistry of each new waste also is evaluated for other parameters that\n10 could cause corrosion.\n11 Compatibility with Liquid Effluent Retention Facility Liner and Piping. As part of the acceptance\n12 process, the criteria of compatibility with the LERF liner materials are evaluated for each aqueous waste\n13 stream. This evaluation is performed using knowledge (as defined by WAC 173-303-040) of constituent\n14 concentrations in the aqueous waste stream or using constituent concentrations obtained by analyzing the\n15 waste stream for the constituents identified in Table B.1 using the analytical methods for these\n16 constituents in Section B.9. Then, the constituent concentrations in the waste stream are compared to the\n17 decision criteria in Table B. 1. If all constituent concentrations are below the decision criteria, then the\n18 waste stream is considered compatible with the LERF liner and may be accepted for treatment.\n19 Otherwise, the waste stream is considered incompatible with the LERF liner, and it cannot be accepted for\n20 treatment in the LERF basins. However, a waste stream may still be acceptable for treatment in ETF if it\n21 is fed directly to ETF, bypassing the LERF Basins. Results of this evaluation are documented in the\n22 Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF and 200 Area ETF File according to Permit Condition 11.1.\n23 The rational for establishing the liner compatibility constituents and decision criteria in Table B. I is as\n24 follows: The high-density polyethylene liners in the LERF basins potentially are vulnerable to the\n25 presence of certain constituents that might be present in some aqueous waste. Using EPA SW-846,\n26 Method 9090, the liner materials were tested to evaluate compatibility between aqueous waste stored in\n27 the LERF and synthetic liner components. Based on the data from the compatibility test and vendor data\n28 on the liner materials, several constituents and parameters were identified as potentially harmful (at high\n29 concentrations) to the integrity of the liners. From these data and the application of safety factors,\n30 concentration limits in Table B. 1 were established.\n31 The strategy for protecting the integrity of a LERF liner is to establish upfront that an aqueous waste is\n32 compatible before the waste is accepted into LERF. Characterization data on each new aqueous waste\n33 stream are compared to the limits outlined in Table B. I to ensure compatibility with the LERF liner\n34 material before acceptance into the LERF.\n35 Before a waste stream is processed at the 242-A Evaporator, the generator reviews DST analytical data\n36 and a process condensate profile is developed to ensure the process condensate is compatible with the\n37 LERF liner. For flow through aqueous wastes like the 200-UP-1 Groundwater, characterization data will\n38 be obtained and reviewed every two years to ensure that liner compatibility is maintained.\n39 In some instances, knowledge may be adequate to determine that an aqueous waste is compatible with the\n40 LERF liner. When knowledge is used, it must satisfy the definition of knowledge in WAC 173-303-040.\n41 In those instances where knowledge is adequate, the waste characterization would likely not require\n42 analysis for these parameters and constituents. Storm water is an example where knowledge is adequate\n43 to determine that this aqueous waste is compatible with the LERF liner.\n44 Compatibility with Other Waste. Some aqueous wastes, especially small volume streams, are\n45 accumulated in the LERF with other aqueous waste. Before acceptance into the LERF, the aqueous waste\n46 stream is evaluated for its compatibility with the resident aqueous waste(s). The evaluation focuses on\n47 the potential for an aqueous waste to react with another waste (40 CFR 264, Appendix V, Examples of\n48 Potentially Incompatible Wastes) including formation of any precipitate in the LERF basins.\nAddendum B.16\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 However, the potential for problems associated with commingling aqueous wastes is very low due to the\n2 dilute nature of the wastes; this evaluation confirms the compatibility of two or more aqueous wastes\n3 from different sources. Compatibility is determined by evaluating parameters such as pH, ammonia, and\n4 chloride. No specific analytical test for compatibility is performed.\n5 If it is determined that an aqueous waste stream is incompatible with other aqueous waste streams,\n6 alternate management scenarios are available. For example, another LERF basin that contains a\n7 compatible aqueous waste(s) might be used, or the aqueous waste stream might be fed directly into\n8 200 Area ETF for treatment. In any case, potentially incompatible waste streams are not mixed, and all\n9 aqueous waste is managed in a way that precludes a reaction, degradation of the liner, or interference with\n10 200 Area ETF treatment process.\n11 B.2.3 Periodic Review Process\n12 In accordance with WAC 173-303-300(4)(a), an influent aqueous waste will be periodically reviewed as\n13 necessary to ensure that the characterization is accurate and current. At a minimum, an aqueous waste\n14 stream will be reviewed in the following situations.\n15 * The LERF and 200 Area ETF management have been notified, or have reason to believe that the\n16 process generating the waste has changed.\n17 * The LERF and 200 Area ETF management note an increase or decrease in the concentration of a\n18 constituent in an aqueous waste stream, beyond the range of concentrations that was described or\n19 predicted in the waste characterization.\n20 * Waste streams will be reviewed every two years.\n21 In these situations, LERF and 200 Area ETF management will review the available information. If\n22 existing analytical information is not sufficient, the generator may be asked to review and update the\n23 current waste characterization, to supply a new WPS, or re-sample and re-analyze the aqueous waste, as\n24 necessary. Other situations that might require a re-evaluation of a waste stream are discussed in the\n25 following sections.\n26 B.2.4 Record/information and Decision\n27 The information and data collected throughout the acceptance process, and the evaluation and decision on\n28 whether to accept an influent aqueous waste stream for treatment or storage in the LERF or 200 Area ETF\n29 are documented as part of Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF and 200 Area ETF File pursuant to\n30 Permit Condition 11.1. Specifically, the Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF and 200 Area ETF File\n31 contains the following components on a new influent aqueous waste stream:\n32 * The signed WPS for each aqueous waste stream and analytical data.\n33 * Knowledge used to characterize a dangerous/mixed waste (under WAC 173-303), and\n34 information supporting the adequacy of the knowledge.\n35 * The evaluation on whether an aqueous waste stream meets the waste acceptance criteria,\n36 including:\n37 o The evaluation for regulatory acceptability including appropriate regulatory approvals.\n38 o The evaluation for LERF liner compatibility and for compatibility with other aqueous waste.\n39\nAddendum B.17\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 Table B.1. General Limits for Liner Compatibility\nLimit (m(\n(sum of\nconstituf\nChemical Family Constituent(s) or Parameter(s) concentr\nAlcohol/glycol 1 -butanol 500,000\nAlkanone acetone, 200,000\nAlkenone' none targeted N/A\nAromatic/cyclic acetophenone, benzene, carbozole, chrysene, cresol, 2000\nhydrocarbon di-n-octyl phthalate, diphenylamine, isophorone, pyridine,\ntetrahydrofuran\nHalogenated arochlors, carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, hexachlorobenzene, 2000\nhydrocarbon lindane (gamma-BHC), hexachlorocyclopentadiene, methylene\nchloride, p-chloroaniline, tetrachloroethylene, 2,4,6-\ntrichlorophenol\nAliphatic hydrocarbon none targeted N/A\nEther dichloroisopropyl ether 2000\nOther hydrocarbons acetontrile, carbon disulfide, n-nitrosodimethylamine, tributyl 2000\nphosphate\nOxidizers none targeted NA\nAcids, Bases, Salts ammonia, cyanide, anions, cations 100,000\npH pH 0.5 < pH <\n2 'Analytical methods for the parameters and constituents are provided in Section B.9\n3 2Analytical data are evaluated using the following 'sum of the fraction' technique. The individual constituent concentration is\n4 evaluated against the compatibility limit for its chemical family. The sum of the evaluations must be less than 1. pH is not part\n5 of this evaluation.\n6 i\n7~~ (-nn) < I8 n=1 LIMITn\n9 'Ketone containing saturated alkyl group(s)\n10 4Ketone containing unsaturated alkyl group(s)\n11 Where 'i' is the number of organic constituents detected\n12 mg/L = milligrams per liter\n13 NA = not applicable\n14\nAddendum B.18\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nTable B.2. Waste Acceptance Criteria\nGeneral Criteria Criteria Description\nCategory\n1. Characterization A. Each generator must provide an aqueous waste profile.\nB. Each generator must designate the aqueous waste stream.\nC. Each generator must provide analytical data and/or knowledge.\n2. Regulatory acceptability A. The LERF and 200 Area ETF can store and treat influent aqueous wastes with\nwaste numbers identified in Addendum A for the LERF and 200 Area ETF,\nand the 200 Area ETF Delisting, 40 CFR 261, Appendix IX, Table 2.\nB. The aqueous waste must comply with conditions of the Discharge Permit.\n3. Operational acceptability A. Determine whether an aqueous waste stream is treatable, considering:\n1. Whether the removal and destruction efficiencies on the constituents of\nconcern will be adequate to meet the Discharge Permit and Delisting\nlevels\n2. Other treatability concerns; analyses for this evaluation may include:\ntotal dissolved solids iron\ntotal organic carbon magnesium\ntotal suspended solids nitrate\nspecific conductivity nitrite\nalkalinity phosphate\nammonia potassium\nbarium silicon\ncalcium sodium\nchloride sulfate\nfluoride pH\nB. Determine whether an aqueous waste stream is compatible, considering:\n1. Whether an aqueous waste stream presents corrosion concerns with\nrespect to ETF; analysis may include chloride and fluoride\n2. Whether an aqueous waste stream is compatible with LERF liner\nmaterials, compare characterization data to the liner compatibility limits\n(Table B.1).\n3. Whether an aqueous waste stream is compatible with other aqueous\nwaste(s), 40 CFR 264, Appendix V, comparison will be used.\n1 B.3 Special Management Requirements\n2 Special management requirements for aqueous wastes that are managed in the LERF or 200 Area ETF are\n3 discussed in the following section.\n4 B.3.1 Land Disposal Restriction Compliance at Liquid Effluent Retention Facility\n5 Because LERF provides treatment through flow and pH equalization, a surface impoundment treatment\n6 exemption from the land disposal restrictions was granted in accordance with 40 CFR 268.4, and\n7 WAC 173-303-040. This treatment exemption is subject to several conditions, including a requirement\n8 that the WAP address the sampling and analysis of the treatment 'residue' [40 CFR 268.4(a)(2)(i) and\n9 WAC 173-303-300(5)(h)(i) and (ii)] to ensure the 'residue' meets applicable treatment standards. Though\n10 the term 'residue' is not specifically defined, this condition further requires that sampling must be\n11 designed to represent the \"sludge and the supernatant\" indicating that a residue may have a sludge (solid)\n12 and supernatant (liquid) component.\nAddendum B.19\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 Solid residue is not anticipated to accumulate in a LERF basin for the following reasons:\n2 * Aqueous waste streams containing sludge would not be accepted into LERF under the acceptance\n3 criteria of treatability (Section B.2.2.2. 1).\n4 * No solid residue was reported from process condensate discharged to LERF in 1995.\n5 * The LERF basins are covered and all incoming air first passes through a breather filter.\n6 * No precipitating or flocculating chemicals are used in flow and pH equalization.\n7 * Multiple waste streams managed in a single LERF basin are evaluated for the formation of\n8 precipitates. Wastes that would form precipitates are not accepted for treatment at LERF.\n9 Therefore, the residue component subject to this condition is the supernatant (liquid component).\n10 Additionally, an aqueous waste stream is evaluated for the potential to deposit solids in a LERF basin\n11 (i.e., an aqueous waste that contains suspended solids). If necessary, filtration at the waste source could\n12 be required before acceptance into LERF. Therefore, the residue component in LERF subject to this\n13 condition is the supernatant (liquid component). The contingency for removal of solids will be addressed\n14 during closure in Addendum H, Closure Plan.\n15 The conditions of the treatment exemption also require that treatment residues (i.e., aqueous wastes),\n16 which do not meet the LDR treatment standards \"must be removed at least annually\"\n17 [40 CFR 268.4(a)(2)(ii) incorporated by reference by WAC 173-303-140]. To address the conditions of\n18 this exemption, an influent aqueous waste is sampled and analyzed and the LDR status of the aqueous\n19 waste is established as part of the acceptance process. The LERF basins are then managed such that any\n20 aqueous waste(s), which exceeds an LDR standard is removed annually from a LERF basin, except for a\n21 heel of approximately 1 meter. A heel is required to stabilize the LERF liner. The volume of the heel is\n22 approximately 1.9 million liters.\n23 B.4 Influent Aqueous Waste Sampling and Analysis\n24 The following sections provide a summary of the sampling procedures, frequencies, and analytical\n25 parameters for characterization of influent aqueous waste (Section B.2) and in support of the special\n26 management requirements for aqueous waste in the LERF (Section B.3).\n27 B.4.1 Sampling Procedures\n28 With a few exceptions, generators are responsible for the characterization, including sampling and\n29 analysis, of an influent aqueous waste. Process condensate is either sampled at the 242-A Evaporator or\n30 accumulated in a LERF basin following a 242-A Evaporator campaign and sampled. Other exceptions\n31 will be handled on a case-by-case basis and the Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF and 200 Area\n32 ETF File will be maintained at the unit for inspection by Ecology. The following section discusses the\n33 sampling locations, methodologies, and frequencies for these aqueous wastes. For samples collected at\n34 the LERF and 200 Area ETF, unit-specific sampling protocol is followed. The sample containers,\n35 preservation materials, and holding times for each analysis are listed in Section B.9.\n36 B.4.1.1 Batch Samples\n37 In those cases where an aqueous waste is sampled in a LERF basin, samples are collected from four of the\n38 six available sample risers located in each basin, i.e., four separate samples. When LERF levels are low,\n39 fewer than four samples can be taken if the sampling approach is still representative. Though there are\n40 eight sample risers at each basin, one is dedicated to liquid level instrumentation and another is dedicated\n41 as an influent port. Operating experience indicates that four samples adequately capture the spatial\n42 variability of an aqueous waste stream in the LERF basin. Specifically, sections of stainless steel\n43 (or other compatible material) tubing are inserted into the sample riser to an appropriate depth. Using a\n44 portable pump, the sample line is flushed with the aqueous waste and the sample collected. The grab\n45 sample containers typically are filled for volatile organic compounds (VOC) analysis first, followed by\n46 the remainder of the containers for the other parameters.\nAddendum B.20\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI Several sample ports are also located at 200 Area ETF, including a valve on the recirculation line at\n2 200 Area ETF surge tank, and a sample valve on a tank discharge pump line at 200 Area ETF Load-in\n3 Station. All samples are obtained at the LERF or 200 Area ETF are collected in a manner consistent with\n4 SW-846 procedures (EPA as amended).\n5 B.4.2 Analytical Rationale\n6 As stated previously, each generator is responsible for designating and characterizing an aqueous waste\n7 stream. Accordingly, each generator samples and analyzes an influent waste stream using the target list\n8 of parameters (Table B.3) for the waste acceptance process. At the discretion of the LERF and ETF\n9 management, a generator may provide knowledge in lieu of some analyses as discussed in\n10 Section B.2.1.1. The LERF and ETF personnel will work with the generator to determine which\n11 parameters are appropriate for the characterization.\n12 The analytical methods for these parameters are provided in Section B.9. All methods are EPA methods\n13 satisfying the requirements of WAC 173-303-110(3). Additional analyses may be required if historical\n14 information and knowledge indicate that an influent aqueous waste contains constituents not included in\n15 the target list of parameters. For example, if knowledge indicates that an aqueous waste contains a\n16 parameter that is regulated by the Groundwater Quality Criteria (WAC 173-200), that parameter(s) would\n17 be added to the suite of analyses required for that aqueous waste stream.\n18 The analytical data for the parameters presented in Table B.3, including VOC, Semi-volatile Organic\n19 Compound (SVOC), metals, anions, and general chemistry parameters are used to define the physical and\n20 chemical properties of the aqueous waste for the following:\n21 * Set operating conditions in the LERF and ETF (e.g., to determine operating configuration, refer\n22 to Section B.2.2.2)\n23 * Identify concentrations of some constituents which may also interfere with, or foul ETF treatment\n24 process (e.g., fouling of the RO membranes, refer to Section B.2.2.2)\n25 * Evaluate LERF liner and piping material compatibility\n26 * Determine treatability to evaluate if applicable constituents in the treated effluent will meet\n27 Discharge Permit and Delisting limits\n28 * Estimate concentrations of some constituents in the waste generated in the secondary treatment\n29 train (i.e., dry powder waste).\n30\nAddendum B.21\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nTable B.3. Target Parameters for Influent Aqueous Waste Analyses\nVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS\nAcetone Acetophenone\nAcetonitrile Cresol (o, p, m)\nBenzene Dichloroisopropyl ether (bis(2-chloropropyl)ether)\n1-Butanol Di-n-octyl phthalate\nCarbon disulfide Diphenylamine\nCarbon tetrachloride Hexachlorobenzene\nChloroform Hexachlorocyclopentadiene\nMethylenechloride losophorone\nTetrachloroethylene Lindane (gamma-BHC)\nTetrahydrofuran N-nitrosodimethylamine\nPyridine\nTributyl phosphate\n2,4,6-Trichlorophenol\nTOTAL METALS ANIONS\nArsenic Magnesium Chloride\nBarium Mercury Fluoride\nBeryllium Nickel Nitrate\nCadmium Potassium Nitrite\nCalcium Selenium Phosphate\nChromium Silicon Sulfate\nCopper Silver GENERAL CHEMISTRY PARAMETERS\nIron Sodium Ammonia\nLead Vanadium Cyanide\nZinc pH\nTotal suspended solids\nTotal dissolved solids\nTotal organic carbon\nSpecific conductivity\n1 B.5 Treated Effluent Sampling and Analysis\n2 The treated aqueous waste, or effluent, from 200 Area ETF is collected in three 2,940,000-liter\n3 verification tanks before discharge to the SALDS. To determine whether the Discharge Permit early\n4 warning values, enforcement limits, and the Delisting criteria are met, the effluent routinely is sampled at\n5 the verification tanks. The sampling and analyses performed are described in the following sections.\n6 B.5.1 Rationale for Effluent Analysis Parameter Selection\n7 The parameters measured in the treated effluent are required by the following regulatory documents:\n8 * Delisting criteria from the 200 Area ETF Delisting (40 CFR 261, Appendix IX, Table 2)\n9 * Corresponding State Final Delisting issued pursuant to WAC 173-303-910(3)\n10 * Effluent limits from the Washington State Waste Discharge Permit (No. ST 4500)\n11 * Early warning values from the Washington State Waste Discharge Permit (No. ST 4500)\n12 The 200 Area ETF Delisting provides two testing regimes for the treated effluent. Initial verification\n13 testing is performed when a new influent waste stream is processed through the 200 Area ETF.\nAddendum B.22\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 For each 200 Area ETF influent waste stream, the first generated verification tank must be sampled and\n2 analyzed for all delisting constituents and conductivity. Subsequent verification sampling and analysis of\n3 all delisting parameters is performed on every 151 tank of that 200 Area ETF influent waste stream. If\n4 the concentration of any analyte is found to exceed a Washington State Waste Discharge Permit\n5 (No. ST 4500), enforcement limit or a Delisting criterion, the contents of the verification tank are\n6 reprocessed and/or re-analyzed. The next verification tank generated is also sampled for all delisting\n7 constituents. If the concentration of any analyte exceeds an early warning value, an early warning value\n8 report is prepared and submitted to Ecology.\n9 B.5.2 Effluent Sampling Strategy: Methods, Location, Analyses, and Frequency\n10 Effluent sampling methods and locations, the analyses performed, and frequency of sampling are\n11 discussed in the following sections.\n12 B.5.2.1 Effluent Sampling Method and Location\n13 Samples of treated effluent are collected and analyzed to verify the treatment process using 200 Area ETF\n14 specific sampling protocol. These verification samples are collected at a sampling port on the verification\n15 tank recirculation line. Section B.9 presents the sample containers, preservatives, and holding times for\n16 each parameter monitored in the effluent.\n17 B.5.2.2 Analyses of Effluent\n18 The parameters required by the current Washington State Waste Discharge Permit (No. ST 4500), and\n19 Final Delisting 200 Area ETF, conditions are presented in Table B.4. The analytical methods and PQLs\n20 associated with each parameter are provided in Section B.9. The methods and PQLs are equivalent to\n21 those used in the analysis of influent aqueous waste.\n22 B.5.2.3 Frequency of Sampling\n23 Treated effluent is tested for all parameters listed in Table B.4 on a frequency satisfying the permit\n24 conditions of the Washington State Waste Discharge Permit (No. ST 4500), and the 200 Area ETF\n25 Delisting. This effluent must meet the Washington State Waste Discharge Permit (No. ST 4500), and\n26 200 Area ETF Delisting limits associated with these parameters. Grab samples are collected from each\n27 verification tank.\n28 During operation of 200 Area ETF, if one or more of the constituents exceeds a Delisting criterion, the\n29 Delisting conditions require:\n30 * The characterization data and processing strategy of the influent waste stream be reviewed and\n31 changed accordingly to ensure the contents of subsequent tanks do not exceed the Delisting\n32 criteria\n33 * The contents of the verification tank are recycled for additional treatment. The contents that are\n34 recycled are resampled after treatment to ensure no constituents exceed a Delisting criteria\n35 * The contents of the following verification tank are sampled for compliance with the Delisting\n36 criteria.\n37 * Treated effluent that does not meet Washington State Waste Discharge Permit (No. ST 4500) is\n38 not discharged to the SALDS until the tank has been retreated and/or reanalyzed.\n39 B.6 Effluent Treatment Facility Generated Waste Sampling and Analysis\n40 The wastes discussed in this section include the wastes generated at 200 Area ETF and are managed in the\n41 container storage areas of 200 Area ETF. This section describes the characterization of the following\n42 secondary waste streams generated within 200 Area ETF:\n43 * Secondary waste generated from the treatment process, including the following waste forms:\n44 o dry powder waste\nAddendum B.23\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 o concentrate tanks slurry\n2 o sludge removed from process tanks\n3 * Waste generated by operations and maintenance activities\n4 * Miscellaneous waste generated within 200 Area ETF.\n5 For each waste stream described, a characterization methodology and rationale are provided, and\n6 sampling requirements are addressed.\n7 B.6.1 Secondary Waste Generated from Treatment Processes\n8 The following terms used in this Section, including powder, dry powder, waste powder, and dry waste\n9 powder, are equivalent to the term 'dry powder waste'.\n10 A dry powder waste is generated from the secondary treatment train, from the treatment of an aqueous\n11 waste. Waste is received in the secondary treatment train in waste receiving tanks where it is fed into an\n12 evaporator. Concentrate waste from the evaporator is then fed to a concentrate tank. From these tanks,\n13 the waste is fed to a thin film dryer and dried into a powder, and collected into containers. The containers\n14 are filled via a remotely controlled system. The condensed overheads from the evaporator and thin film\n15 dryer are returned to the surge tank to be fed to the primary treatment train.\n16 Occasionally, salts from the treatment process (e.g., calcium sulfate and magnesium hydroxide)\n17 accumulate in process tanks as sludge. Because processing these salts could cause fouling in the thin film\n18 dryer, and to allow uninterrupted operation of the treatment process, the sludge is removed and placed in\n19 containers. The sludge is dewatered and the supernate is pumped back to 200 Area ETF for treatment.\n20 The secondary treatment system typically receives and processes the following by-products generated\n21 from the primary treatment train:\n22 * Concentrate from the first RO stage\n23 * Backwash from the rough and fine filters\n24 * Regeneration waste from the ion exchange system\n25 * Spillage or overflow collected in the process sumps.\n26 In an alternate operating scenario, some aqueous wastes may be fed to the secondary treatment train\n27 before the primary treatment train.\n28 B.6.1.1 Special Requirements Pertaining to Land Disposal Restrictions\n29 Containers of 200 Area ETF secondary waste are transferred to a storage or final disposal unit, as\n30 appropriate (e.g., the Central Waste Complex or to the Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility).\n31 200 Area ETF personnel provide the analytical characterization data and necessary knowledge for the\n32 waste to be managed by the receiving staff, and for the appropriate LDR documentation.\n33 The following information on the secondary waste is included on the LDR documentation provided to the\n34 receiving unit:\n35 * Dangerous waste numbers (as applicable)\n36 * Determination on whether the waste is restricted from land disposal according to the requirements\n37 of 40 CFR 268 incorporated by reference by WAC 173-303-140 (i.e., the LDR status of the\n38 waste)\n39 The waste tracking information associated with the transfer of waste\n40 * Waste analysis results.\nAddendum B.24\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 B.6.1.2 Sampling Methods\n2 The dry powder waste and containerized sludge are sampled from containers using the principles\n3 presented in SW-846 (EPA as amended) and ASTM Methods (American Society for Testing Materials),\n4 as referenced in WAC 173-303-110(2). The sample container requirements, sample preservation\n5 requirements, and maximum holding times for each of the parameters analyzed in either matrix are\n6 presented in Section B.9.\n7 Concentrate tank waste samples are collected from recirculation lines, which provide mixing in the tank\n8 during pH adjustment and prevent caking. The protocol for concentrate tank sampling prescribes opening\n9 a sample port in the recirculation line to collect samples directly into sample containers. The sample port\n10 line is flushed before collecting a grab sample. The VOC sampling typically is performed first for grab\n11 samples. Each VOC sample container will be filled such that cavitation at the sample valve is minimized\n12 and the container has no headspace. The remainder of the containers for the other parameters will be\n13 filled next.\nTable B.4. Rationale for Parameters to be Monitored in Treated Effluent\nDischarge Permit2\n200 Area Enforcement Early\nETF Limit Warning\nParameter (Cas No.) Delisting' Value\nVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS\nAcetone (67-64-1) X\nAcetonitrile (75-05-8) X\nBenzene (71-43-2) X X\n1-Butanol (71-36-3) X\nCarbon disulfide (75-15-0) X\nCarbon tetrachloride (56-23-5) X X\nChloroform (67-66-3) X\nMethylene Chloride (75-09-2) M\nTetrachloroethylene (127-18-4) X\nTetrahydrofuran (109-99-9) X X\nSEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS\nAcetophenone (98-86-2) X\nCarbazole (86-74-8) X\np-Chloroaniline (106-47-8) X\nChrysene (218-01-9) X\nCresol (total) (1319-77-3) X\nDichloroisopropyl ether (108-60-1) X(bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether)\nDi-n-octyl phthalate (117-84-0) X\nDiphenylamine (122-39-4) X\nHexachlorobenzene (118-74-1) X\nHexachlorocyclopentadiene (77-47-4) X\nIsophorone (78-59-1) X\nLindane (gamma-BHC) (58-89-9) X\nN-nitrosodimethylamine (62-75-9) X X\nPyridine (110-86-1) X\nAddendum B.25\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nTable B.4. Rationale for Parameters to be Monitored in Treated Effluent\nDischarge Permit2\n200 Area Enforcement Early\nETF Limit Warning\nParameter (Cas No.) Delisting' Value\nTributyl phosphate (126-73-8) X\n2,4,6-Trichlorophenol (88-06-2) X\nPCBs\nAroclor 1016 (12674-11-2) X\nAroclor 1221 (11104-28-2) X\nAroclor 1232 (11141-16-5) X\nAroclor 1242 (53469-21-9) X\nAroclor 1248 (12672-29-6) X\nAroclor 1254 (11097-69-1) X\nAroclor 1260 (11096-82-5) X\nTOTAL METALS3\nArsenic (7440-38-2) X X\nBarium (7440-39-3) X\nBeryllium (7740-41-7) X X\nCadmium (7440-43-9) X X\nChromium (7440-47-3) X X\nCopper (7440-50-8) X\nLead (7439-92-1) X X\nMercury (7439-97-6) X X\nNickel (7440-02-0) X\nSelenium (7782-49-2) X\nSilver (7440-22-4) X\nVanadium (7440-62-2) X\nZinc (7440-66-6) X\nANIONS\nChloride (16887-00-6) X\nFluoride (16984-48-8) X\nNitrate (as N) (14797-55-8) X\nNitrite (as N) (1479765-0) X\nSulfate (14808-79-8) X\nOTHER ANALYSES\nAmmonia (7664-41-7) X X\nCyanide (57-12-5) X\nTotal dissolved solids X\nTotal organic carbon X\nTotal suspended solids X\nSpecific conductivity M\n'arameters required by the current conditions of the 200 Area ETF Delisting, 40 CFR 261, Appendix IX, Table 2,70 FR 44496\n2 (EPA 2005)\n3 2Parameters required by the current conditions of the State Waste Discharge Permit, No. ST 4500\nAddendum B.26\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 3Metals reported as total concentrations\n2 X = Rationale for measuring this parameter in treated effluent\n3 M = Monitor only; no limit defined\n4 PCBs = polychlorinated biphenyls\n5 B.6.1.3 Sampling Frequency\n6 When designation or identification of applicable LDR treatment standards of the 200 Area ETF secondary\n7 waste cannot be based on influent characterization data or knowledge as described in Section B.6. 1.1,\n8 200 Area ETF secondary waste is sampled on a batch basis. A batch is defined as any volume of aqueous\n9 waste that is being treated under consistent and constant process conditions.\n10 When personnel exposures are of concern, one representative sample will be collected from the\n11 concentrate tank, if waste from the concentrate tank. The sample will be analyzed for the appropriate\n12 parameters identified in Table B.5 based on the needs identified from evaluating influent waste analysis\n13 data. If sampling of the concentrate tank is not technically practicable for purposes of designating the\n14 powder, direct sampling of the dry powder will be used to make determinations on the dry powder. The\n15 dry powder or concentrate tanks will be resampled in the following situations:\n16 * Change in influent characterization.\n17 * Change in process chemistry, as indicated by in-line monitoring of conductivity and pH.\n18 * The LERF and 200 Area ETF management have been notified, or have reason to believe that the\n19 process generating the waste has changed (for example, a source change such as a change in the\n20 well-head for groundwater that significantly changes the aqueous waste characterization).\n21 * The LERF and 200 Area ETF management note an increase or decrease in the concentration of a\n22 constituent in an aqueous waste stream, beyond the range of concentrations that was described or\n23 predicted in the waste characterization.\n24 B.6.2 Operations and Maintenance Waste Generated at the 200 Area Effluent\n25 Treatment Facility\n26 Operation and maintenance of process and ancillary equipment generates additional routine waste. These\n27 waste materials are segregated to ensure proper handling and disposition, and to minimize the\n28 commingling of potentially dangerous waste with nondangerous waste. The following waste streams are\n29 anticipated to be generated during routine operation and maintenance of 200 Area ETF. This waste might\n30 or might not be dangerous waste, depending on the nature of the material and its exposure to a dangerous\n31 waste.\n32 * Spent lubricating oils and paint waste from pumps, the dryer rotor, compressors, blowers, and\n33 general maintenance activities.\n34 * Spent filter media and process filters.\n35 * Spent ion exchange resin.\n36 * High Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA) filters.\n37 * UV light tubes.\n38 * RO membranes.\n39 * Equipment that cannot be returned to service.\n40 * Other miscellaneous waste that might contact a dangerous waste (e.g., plastic sheeting, glass,\n41 rags, paper, waste solvent, or aerosol cans).\n42 These waste streams are stored at 200 Area ETF before being transferred for final treatment, storage, or\n43 disposal as appropriate.\n44\nAddendum B.27\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 This waste is characterized and designated using knowledge (from previously determined influent\n2 aqueous waste composition information); analytical data; and material safety data sheets (MSDS) of the\n3 chemical products present in the waste or used (the data sheets are maintained at 200 Area ETF).\n4 Sampling of these waste streams is not anticipated; however, if an unidentified or unlabeled waste is\n5 discovered, that waste is sampled. This 'unknown' waste is sampled and analyzed for the parameters in\n6 Table B.5 as appropriate, and will be designated according to Washington state regulatory requirements.\n7 The specific analytical methods for these analyses are provided in Section B.9.\n8 B.6.3 Other Waste Generated at the 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility\n9 There are two other potential sources of waste at 200 Area ETF: spills and/or overflows, and discarded\n10 chemical products. Spills may be subject to the requirements of Permit Condition II.E. Spilled material\n11 that potentially might be dangerous waste generally is either containerized or routed to 200 Area ETF\n12 sumps where the material is transferred either to the surge tank for treatment or to the secondary treatment\n13 train. In most cases, knowledge and the use of MSDSs are sufficient to designate the waste material. If\n14 the source of the spilled material is unknown and the material cannot be routed to 200 Area ETF sumps, a\n15 sample of the waste is collected and analyzed according to Table B.5, as necessary, for appropriate\n16 characterization of the waste. Unknown wastes will be designated according to Washington State\n17 regulatory requirements at WAC 173-303-070. The specific analytical methods for these analyses are\n18 provided in Section B.9.\n19 A discarded chemical product waste stream could be generated if process chemicals, cleaning agents, or\n20 maintenance products become contaminated or are otherwise rendered unusable. In all cases, these\n21 materials are appropriately containerized and designated. Sampling is performed, as appropriate, for\n22 waste designation.\n23 Table B.5. 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility Generated Waste -Sampling and\n24 Analysis\nParameter' Rationale\n* Total solids or percent water2 * Calculate dry weight concentrations\n* Volatile organic compounds' * LDR -verify treatment standards\n* Semivolatile organic compounds' * LDR -verify treatment standards\n* Metals (arsenic, barium, cadmium, * Waste designation\nchromium, lead, mercury, selenium, * LDR -verify treatment standards\nsilver)\n* Cation and anions of concern * Address receiving TSD unit waste acceptance\nrequirements\n* pH * Waste designation\n25 1 For influent and concentrate tank samples, the total sample (solid plus liquid) is analyzed and the analytical result\n26 is expressed on a dry weight basis. The result for toxicity characteristic metal and organic is divided by a factor\n27 of 20 and compared to the toxicity characteristic (TC) constituent limits [WAC 173-303-090(8)]. If the TC limit\n28 is met or exceeded, the waste is designated accordingly. All measured parameters are compared against the\n29 corresponding treatment standards.\n30 2 Total solids or percent water are not determined for unknown waste and dry powder waste samples and are\n31 analyzed in maintenance waste and sludge samples, as appropriate ( i.e., percent water might not be required for\n32 such routine maintenance waste as aerosol cans, fluorescent tubes, waste oils, batteries, etc., or sludge that has\n33 dried).\n34 3 VOC and/or SVOC analysis of secondary waste is required unless influent characterization data and knowledge\n35 indicate that the constituent will not be in the final secondary waste at or above the LDR.\n36 LDR = land disposal restrictions\n37 TSD = treatment, storage, and/or disposal\nAddendum B.28\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 B.7 Quality Assurance/Quality Control\n2 The following quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) plan for LERF and 200 Area ETF is provided\n3 as required by WAC 173-303-810(6) and follows the guidelines of EPA QA/G-5.\n4 B.7.1 Project Management\n5 The following sections address project administrative functions and approaches.\n6 B.7.1.1.1 Project Organization\n7 Overall management of the LERF/200 Area ETF is performed by the Facility Manager, who is\n8 responsible for safe operation of the facility, including implementation of this QA/QC plan and\n9 compliance with applicable permits and regulations. The Facility Manager also provides retention of\n10 project records in accordance with this plan. Assisting the Facility Manager is an Environmental Field\n11 Representative that monitors compliance, reviews new requirements and regulations, and interfaces with\n12 EPA and Ecology. Also assisting the Facility Manager is a QA representative who is responsible for\n13 implementing the QA program at the facility.\n14 Reporting to the Facility Manager are several support groups. The Operations group consists of trained\n15 personnel who operate the plant, including operators performing sampling activities such as collection,\n16 packaging, and transportation of samples to the laboratory. The Maintenance group is responsible for\n17 performing calibrations and preventative maintenance on facility equipment, including pH, conductivity,\n18 and flow meters required by environmental permits. The Engineering group monitors the process with\n19 online instruments and sampling for process control. The Engineering group also performs waste\n20 acceptance, and environmental compliance activities, including scheduling sampling, generating data\n21 forms, and reviewing data.\n22 B.7.1.2 Special Training\n23 Individuals involved in sampling, analysis, and data review will be trained and qualified to implement\n24 safely the activities addressed in this WAP and QA/QC plan. Training will conform to the training\n25 requirements specified in WAC 173-303-330 and the LERF/200 Area ETF Dangerous Waste Training\n26 Plan (Addendum F). Training records will be maintained in accordance with Section B.7.1.3 of this\n27 WAP.\n28 B.7.1.3 Documentation and Records\n29 Sample records are documented as part of the Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF and 200 Area\n30 ETF File pursuant to Permit Condition 11.1. These documents and records include the following:\n31 * Training\n32 * Chains of Custody for all regulatory sampling performed by LERF and 200 Area ETF\n33 * Data Summary Reports\n34 * QA/QC reports\n35 * Assessment reports\n36 * Instrument inspection, maintenance, and calibration logs\n37 B.7.2 Data Quality Parameters and Criteria\n38 Data quality parameters are listed by EPA QA/G-5S, Guidance for Choosing a Sampling Design for\n39 Environmental Data Collection as:\n40 * Purpose of Data Collection (e.g. determining if a parameter exceeds a threshold level).\n41 * Spatial and Temporal Boundaries of Study.\n42 * Preliminary Estimation of Sample Support (volume that each sample represents).\nAddendum B.29\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 * Statistical Parameter of Interest (e.g. mean, percentile, percentage).\n2 * Limits on Decision Error/Precision (e.g. false acceptance error, false rejection error).\n3 The parameters for the first four bullets (limits, sample points, frequency of samples, etc.) are already\n4 established in the permits, delisting petition, and this WAP. The focus of this QA/QC plan is on limits on\n5 decision error/precision.\n6 The data quality parameters were chosen to ensure Limits on Decision Error/Precision are appropriate for\n7 purposes of using the data to demonstrate compliance with permits, delisting exclusion limits, and this\n8 WAP. The principal quality parameters are precision, accuracy, representativeness, comparability, and\n9 completeness. Secondary data parameters of importance include sensitivity and detection levels. The\n10 data quality parameters and the data acceptance criteria are discussed below.\n11 B.7.2.1 Precision\n12 Precision is a measure of agreement among replicate measurements of the same property, under\n13 prescribed similar conditions. Precision is expressed in terms of the relative percent difference (RPD) for\n14 duplicate measurements. QA/QC sample types that test precision include field and laboratory duplicates\n15 and spike duplicates. The RPDs for laboratory duplicates and/or matrix spike duplicates will be routinely\n16 calculated.\n17 RPD = (100)absolute value of sample result -duplicate sample result\naverage of sample result + duplicate sample result\n18 Matrix spike duplicates are replicates of matrix spike samples that are analyzed with every analytical\n19 batch that contains an ETF treated effluent sample. The precision of the analytical methods are estimated\n20 from the results of the matrix spike (MS) and the matrix spike duplicate (MSD) for selected analytes.\n21 Matrix spike analyses cannot be performed for certain analytical methods, including conductivity, pH,\n22 and total dissolved solids. Duplicate analyses are used to determine the RPD for these methods. The\n23 precision acceptance criteria are specified in Table B.6.\n24 B.7.2.2 Accuracy\n25 Accuracy assesses the closeness of the measured value to an accepted reference value. Accuracy of\n26 analytical results is typically assessed using matrix spikes. A matrix spike is the addition of a known\n27 amount of the analyte to the sample matrix being analyzed. Accuracy is expressed as a percent recovery\n28 of the spiked samples.\n29 Percent Recovery = 100 (matrix spike sample result -sample result\nspiked amount\n30 Matrix spike analyses cannot be performed on certain analytical methods, including conductivity, pH, and\n31 total dissolved solids. The percent recovery for the laboratory control standard samples demonstrates that\n32 these methods are working properly and gives an estimate of the method's accuracy. The percent\n33 recovery will be routinely calculated.\n34 Accuracy criteria are established to provide confidence that the result is below the action level. Therefore\n35 the closer the result is to the action level the higher the degree of accuracy needed. The upper and lower\n36 accuracy acceptance criteria are specified in Table B.6. The criteria are reasonable values based on\n37 previous analysis of constituents in the delisting exclusion, or similar constituents.\n38 B.7.2.3 Representativeness\n39 Representativeness expresses the degree to which data accurately and precisely represent selected\n40 characteristics of a parameter at a sampling point or process condition.\n41\nAddendum B.30\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI Because of the matrix being analyzed, dilute aqueous solution, it is not expected that representativeness\n2 will be of concern, except when there are potential for changes to process conditions such as the facility\n3 influent concentrations or waste processing strategy. Sampling due to these changes in process conditions\n4 is addressed in Section B.6.1.3 of this WAP.\n5 The representativeness of a sample may be compromised by the presence of contaminants introduced in\n6 the field or the laboratory. To determine if contamination may be present, a blank sample of reagent\n7 water is analyzed. A method blank is performed by the laboratory on every batch of 20 samples being\n8 analyzed at the same time. The presence of a constituent in the sample and the blank sample indicates\n9 contamination has occurred.\n10 B.7.2.4 Completeness\n11 Completeness is a measure of the amount of valid data obtained from a measurement system, expressed\n12 as a percentage of the number of valid measurements that were planned to be collected. Lack of\n13 completeness is sometimes caused by loss of a sample, loss of data, or inability to collect the planned\n14 number of samples. Incompleteness also occurs when data are discarded because they are of unknown or\n15 unacceptable quality. Since most regulatory sampling events performed by LERF/200 Area ETF involve\n16 a single sample, all analysis must be complete and valid.\n17 B.7.2.5 Comparability\n18 Comparability is the confidence with which one data set can be compared to another. Comparability is\n19 achieved by using sampling and analytical techniques, which provide for measurements that are\n20 consistent and representative of the media and conditions measured. In laboratory analysis, the term\n21 comparability focuses on method type, holding times, stability issues, and aspects of overall analytical\n22 quantitation.\n23 B.7.2.6 Sensitivity and Detection Levels\n24 Sensitivity is the measure of the concentration at which an analytical method can positively identify and\n25 report analytical results. Sensitivity represents the maximum value for a detection level that will\n26 reasonably assure the results are below the established limits. The analytical method selected by\n27 LERF/200 Area ETF should have a detection level for each constituent that is below the sensitivity. The\n28 preferred detection level is the practical quantitation limit (PQL), which is lowest concentration that can\n29 be reliably measured during routine laboratory conditions. If the method PQL cannot meet the sensitivity\n30 for some constituents, the minimum concentration or attribute that can be measured by a method (method\n31 detection limit) or by an instrument (instrument detection limit) may be used. The sensitivity levels,\n32 specified in Table B.6, are derived from the delisting limits, water discharge limits, and uncertainty\n33 values, which are based on the required precision and accuracy for each constituent.\n34 B.7.3 Data Generation and Acquisition\n35 The following section addresses QA requirements for data generation and acquisition.\n36 B.7.3.1 Sampling Method\n37 LERF/200 Area ETF samples required by the permits and delisting are collected as grab samples.\n38 Sampling for the purpose of waste designation of secondary waste is performed using grab, composite,\n39 thief, scoop, or composite liquid waste sampler (COLIWASA). The selection of the sample collection\n40 device depends on the type of sample, the sample container, the sampling location, and the nature and\n41 distribution of the waste components. In general, the methodologies used for specific materials\n42 correspond to those referenced to WAC 173-303-110(2). The selection and use of the sampling device is\n43 supervised or performed by a person thoroughly familiar with the sampling requirements.\n44 The following protocol applies to all sampling methods:\n45 * All containers will be filled within as short a time period as reasonably achievable.\nAddendum B.31\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 * Volatile Organic Analysis (VOA) sample containers will be filled first, and prior to any\n2 subdividing of a composited sample.\n3 * VOA samples consisting of a set of two or more sample containers will be filled sequentially.\n4 The sample containers are considered equivalent and given identical sampling times.\n5 * All VOA sample containers must have no headspace and be free of trapped air bubbles.\n6 * Grab sample protocol includes:\n7 o Sample lines should be as short as reasonably achievable and free of traps and pockets in\n8 which solids might settle.\n9 o The sample line should be flushed before sampling with a minimum volume equivalent to\n10 three times the sample line volume.\n11 0 Contamination to the sample from contact with the internal and external surfaces of the tap\n12 should be minimized.\n13 Thief and COLIWASA samplers are used to sample liquid waste containers such as drums. Scoop\n14 samplers are used to sample powder waste generated in the thin-film dryer. Sample requirements for\n15 these samples include:\n16 * Thief or COLIWASA sampler, the sampler should be lowered into the liquid slowly so the level\n17 of the liquid inside and outside the sampler tube remain about the same.\n18 * When lifting the thief or COLIWASA sampler from the solution, the outside should be wiped\n19 down, or the excess water allowed to drip off, before filling the sample container.\n20 B.7.3.2 Sample Handling, Custody, and Shipping\n21 The proper handling of sample bottles after sampling is important to ensure the samples are free of\n22 contamination and to demonstrate the samples have not been tampered with.\n23 B.7.3.2.1 Chain-of-Custody\n24 Evidence of collection, shipment, receipt at the laboratory, and laboratory custody until disposal will be\n25 documented using a chain-of-custody form. The chain-of-custody form will, as a minimum identify\n26 sample identification number, sampling date and time, sampling location, sample bottle type and number,\n27 analyses to be performed, and preservation method.\n28 The operations person who signs as the collector on the chain of custody is the first custodian of the\n29 samples. A custodian must maintain continuous custody of sample containers at all times from the time\n30 the sample is taken until delivery to the laboratory or until delivery to a common carrier for shipment to\n31 an off-site location. Custody is maintained by any of the following:\n32 * The custodian has the samples in view, or has placed the samples in locked storage, or keeps the\n33 samples within a secured area (e.g., controlled by authorized personnel only), or has applied a\n34 tamper-indicating device, such as evidence tape, to the sample containers or shipping containers.\n35 * The custodian has taken physical possession of the samples or the shipping containers sealed with\n36 an intact tamper-indicating device, such as evidence tape.\n37 B.7.3.2.2 Sample Preservation, Containers, and Holding Time\n38 Table B.6 lists the sample container, preservation method, and holding time requirements for different\n39 types of analyses. These parameters are based on the requirements of 40 CFR 136, Table II.\n40 B.7.3.3 Instrument Calibration and Preventive Maintenance\n41 LERF/200 Area ETF uses instruments to monitor operations and meet regulatory requirements. This\n42 includes continuous pH and conductivity monitors required by facility permits and delisting. All\n43 instruments are calibrated according to frequencies and tolerances established by the LERF/200 Area ETF\n44 engineering group.\nAddendum B.32\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI Calibrations and other maintenance actions are scheduled and tracked by LERF/200 Area ETF\n2 maintenance group using a preventive maintenance database. Measuring and test equipment used for\n3 instrument calibration is controlled, calibrated at specified intervals, and maintained to establish accuracy\n4 limits.\n5 B.7.4 Assessment and Oversight\n6 Quality programs can only be effective if meaningful assessments are performed to monitor and respond\n7 to issues associated with program performance. Routine assessment of data is performed as part of the\n8 validation process discussed in Section B.7.5.1.\n9 B.7.4.1 Assessments and Response\n10 Management assessments are conducted by first line management and subject matter experts, focusing on\n11 procedural adequacy, compliance, and overall effectiveness of the program. Management assessments of\n12 the sample program typically include the LERF and 200 Area ETF QA representative. Each management\n13 assessment has a performance objective or lines of inquiry. Examples may include personnel training,\n14 proper performance of sample custody, or completeness of sampling records.\n15 B.7.4.2 Reports to Management\n16 Results of performance assessments, including any issues identified, are provided to the LERF and\n17 200 Area ETF Facility Manager in a written report. The Facility Manager is responsible to correct all\n18 findings from the report.\n19 B.7.5 Verification and Validation of Analytical Data\n20 The data verification and validation processes will ensure that the data resulting from the selected\n21 analytical method are consistent with requirements specified in this QA/QC plan.\n22 B.7.5.1 Data Verification\n23 The primary data reporting will be by electronic data systems. Data verification will be performed on\n24 laboratory data packages that support environmental compliance to ensure that their content is complete\n25 and in order. A review of the data package will be performed to ensure that:\n26 * The data package contains the required technical information.\n27 * Deficiencies are identified and documented.\n28 * Identified deficiencies are corrected by the laboratory and the appropriate revisions are made.\n29 * Deficient pages are replaced with the laboratory corrections.\n30 * A copy of the completed verification report is placed in the data file.\n31 B.7.5.2 Data Validation\n32 Data validation ensures that the data resulting from analytical measurements meet the quality\n33 requirements specified in the QA/QC plan. Data validation will be performed on data packages that\n34 support environmental compliance.\n35 The following are included in data validation:\n36 * Chain-of-Custody (COC) -Verify the COC shows unbroken custody from sampling through\n37 receipt at the laboratory.\n38 * Request analysis -Review the sample results to verify the requested analysis was performed. If\n39 an alternate method was used, verify permit-required detection limits were met.\n40 * Holding times -Review the sample results to verify the analyses were performed within required\n41 holing times and where applicable, extraction times.\nAddendum B.33\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 * Blank -Review the results of trip, field, and equipment blank samples to verify the sample results\n2 are not compromised by contamination.\n3 * Laboratory QC -Verify the laboratory QC was completed and there are no outstanding problems\n4 B.8 References\n5 DOE/RL-92-72, 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility Delisting Petition, Revision 1, 1993,\n6 U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.\n7 Ecology, 1996b, The Washington State Department ofEcology (Ecology) Regulatory Interpretation of the\n8 Liquid Effluent Retention Facility (LERF) Land Disposal Restriction Exemption, letter from\n9 Washington State Department of Ecology to T. Teynor, U.S. Department of Energy and A. DiLiberto,\n10 Westinghouse Hanford Company, September 9, 1996.\n11 Ecology, 2000, Washington State Waste Discharge Permit (No. ST 4500), as amended, for 200 Area\n12 Effluent Treatment Facility, Hanford Facility, Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia,\n13 Washington, August 1, 2000.\n14 EPA, 1983, Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water Wastes, EPA-600/4-79/020, (as amended), National\n15 Exposure Research Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio\n16 EPA, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-846 (Third Edition, as\n17 amended), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,\n18 Washington, D.C.\n19 EPA, 1994, Liquid Effluent Retention Facility (LERF) Land Disposal Restrictions Treatment\n20 Exemption-Regulatory Interpretation EPA/Ecology ID No: WA 7890008967, letter from\n21 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 to J. Hennig, U.S. Department of Energy,\n22 December 6, 1994.\n23 EPA, 2005, 200 Area ETF Delisting [Exclusion], issued to U.S. Department of Energy, 40 CFR 261,\n24 Appendix IX, Table 2 (70 FR 44496, August 3, 2005), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,\n25 Washington, D.C.\n26\nAddendum B.34\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nB.9 Analytical Methods, Sample Containers, Preservative Methods, and\n2 Holding Times\nTable B.6. Sample and Analysis Criteria for Influent Aqueous Waste and Treated\nEffluent\nMethod Accuracy/ Sample containerlAnalytical Precision 4Parameter Mehd PQL frMto3 Preservative4/ HoldingSensitivity2 (pret) time5\n(percent)\nVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS\nAcetone SW-846 8260 40 60-120 / 20 Sample container\n3 x 40-mL amber glass\nwith septum\nPreservative\nHCl to pH<2; 40C\nHolding time\n14 days\nAcetonitrile 820 60-120/20\nBenzene 5 60-120/20\n1-Butanol 1600 60-120/20\nCarbon Disulfide 1500 60-120/20\nCarbon tetrachloride 5 60-120/20\nChloroform 5 50-130/20\nMethylene chloride 5 50-150/20\nTetrachloroethylene 5 65-140/20\nTetrahydrofuran 100 60-120/20\nSEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS\nAcetophenone SW-846 8270 10 70-110 / 25 Sample container\n4 x 1-liter amber glass\nPreservative\n40C\nHolding time\n7 days for extraction; 40\ndays for analysis after\nextraction\nCarbazole 110 50-120/25\np-Chloroaniline 76 50-120/25\nChrysene 350 50-120/25\nCresol (o, p, m) 760 50-120/25\nDi-n-octyl phthalate 300 50-120/25\nDiphenylamine 350 50-120/25\nHexachlorobenzene 2 50-120/25\nHexachlorocyclopentadie 110 50-120 / 25\nne\nIsophorone 2600 50-120/25\nLindane (gamma-BHC) 1.9 50-120 / 25\nN-nitrosodimethylamine 12 50-120 / 25\nPyridine 15 50-120/25\nAddendum B.35\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nTable B.6. Sample and Analysis Criteria for Influent Aqueous Waste and Treated\nEffluent\nAccuracy/.Method Acry!-Sample container4lAnalytical Mehd Precision SapecnmrIParameter Meat l PQL for Method3 Preservative4/ HoldingMethod' Sensitivity2 (pret) time5\n(percent)\nTributyl phosphate 76 50-120/25\n2.4.6-Trichlorophenol 230 50-120 / 25\nPOLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLs (PCBs)\nAroclor-1016 SW-846 8082 0.4 50-110/25 Sample container\n4 x 1-liter amber glass\nPreservative\n40C\nHolding time\n1 year for extraction;\n1 year for analysis after\nextraction\nAroclor-1221 0.4 50-110/25\nAroclor-1232 0.4 50-110/25\nAroclor-1242 0.4 50-110/25\nAroclor-1248 0.4 50-110/25\nAroclor-1254 0.4 50-110/25\nAroclor-1260 0.4 50-110/25\nTOTAL METALS\nArsenic EPA-600 11 70-130 / 20 Sample container\n200.8 1 x 0.5-liter plastic/glass\nPreservative\n1:1 HNO3 to pH<2\nHolding time\n180 days; mercury 28 days\nCadmium 5 70-130/20\nChromium 20 70-130/20\nCopper 70 70-130/20\nLead 10 70-130/20\nMercury 2 70-130/20\nSelenium 20 70-130/20\nBarium SW-846 6010/ 1200 75 -125 / 20\nBeryllium EPA-600 34 75 -125 / 20\nCalcium 200.7 200 75 -125 / 20\nIron 100 75- 125/20\nMagnesium 400 75- 125/20\nNickel 340 75- 125/20\nPotassium 10,000 75- 125/20\nSilicon 580 75- 125/20\nSilver 83 75 -125/20\nSodium 2500 75 -125/20\nVanadium 120 75-125/20\nAddendum B.36\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nTable B.6. Sample and Analysis Criteria for Influent Aqueous Waste and Treated\nEffluent\nMethod Accuracyl Sample container4/AnaytialPrecisionParameter Mealtodl PQL forethsodn Preservative 4/ HoldingMethod' Sensitivity2 (pret) time5\n(percent)\nZinc 5100 75- 125/20\nGENERAL CHEMISTRY\nChloride EPA-600 1000 70-130 / 20 Sample container\n300.0 1 x 60-mL plastic/glass\nPreservative\n40C\nHolding time\n28 days; nitrate and nitrite\n48 hours\nFluoride 880 70-130/20\nFormate 1250 70-130\nNitrate (as N) 100 70-130/20\nNitrite (as N) 100 70-130/20\nPhosphate 1500 70-130/20\nSulfate 10,000 70-130/20\nAmmonia (as N) EPA-600, 40 70-130 / 20 Sample container\n300.7 1 x 50-mL glass or plastic\nPreservative\nH2SO4 to pH<2; 40C\nHolding time\n28 days\nCyanide EPA-600 350 70-130 / 20 Sample container\n335.2/335.3 1 x 250-mL glass or\nplastic\nPreservative\nNaOH to pH>12; 40C\nHolding time\n14 days\nAlkalinity EPA-600 ND ND Sample container\n310.1/310.2 1 x 50-mL glass or plastic\nPreservative\n40C\nHolding time\n14 days\nTotal dissolved solids EPA-600 ND ND Sample container\n160.1 1 x 500-mL glass or\nplastic\nPreservative\n40C\nHolding time\n7 days\nAddendum B.37\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nTable B.6. Sample and Analysis Criteria for Influent Aqueous Waste and Treated\nEffluent\nMethod Accuracy/ Sample container4!Analytical MPrecisionParameter Method' PQL for Method3 Preservative\"/ Holding\nMthd Sensitivy (percent) time5\nTotal suspended solids EPA-600 ND ND Sample container\n160.2 1 x 1-L glass or plastic\nPreservative\n40C\nHolding time\n7 days\nSpecific conductivity EPA-600 ND ND Sample container\n120.1 (in lab) 1 x 50-mL glass or plastic\nPreservative\n40C\nHolding time\n28 days\npH7 EPA-600 ND ND Sample container\n150.1 1 x 60-mL glass or plastic\nPreservative\nNone\nHolding time\nAnalyze immediately\nTotal organic carbon SW-846 9060 ND ND Sample container\nI x 250-mL amber glass\nPreservative\nH2SO4 to pH<2; 40C\nHolding time\n28 days\n1 'SW-846 or EPA-600 methods are presented unless otherwise noted. Other methods might be substituted if the applicable PQL\n2 can be met.\n3 2ST-4500 required method PQL or Delisting Exclusion condition 2 report sensitivity/detection level, whichever is lower. Units\n4 are parts per billion unless otherwise noted.\n5 'Accuracy/precision used to confirm or re-establish MDL\n6 \"Sample bottle, volumes, and preservatives could be adjusted, as applicable, for safety reasons\n7 'Holding time = time between sampling and analysis\n8 7pH monitored in influent aqueous waste only\n9 L = liter\n10 mL = milliliter\n11 NA = not applicable\n12 ND = not determined\n13 MDL = method detection level\n14 PQL = practical quantitation limit\n15 RL = reporting limit\n16\nAddendum B.38\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nTable B.7. Sample Containers, Preservative Methods, and Holding Times for 200 Area ETF\nGenerated Waste\nAccuracy/\nAnalytical Method Precision Sample container'/Parameter Method PQL for Preservative'/ Holding time2\nMethod\n(percent)\nLiquid Matrix\nFor methods other than total solids, analyze using the methods and QA/QC in Table B.6. For each method, analyze\nthe target compound list\nTotal solids EPA-600 160.3 ND ND Sample container\n1 x 500-mL glass or plastic\nPreservative -40C\nHolding time -7 days\nSolid Matrix\nVolatile organic SW-846 8260 Refer to Refer to Sample container\ncompounds (combined Table B.6 Table B.6 1 x 40-mL amber glass with septum\nmethod target compound Preservative -4'C\nlists) Holding time -14 days\nSemivolatile organic SW-846 8270 Refer to Refer to Sample container\ncompounds (method target Table B.6 Table B.6 I x 125-mL amber glass\ncompound list) Preservative -40C\nHolding time -14 days for\nextraction; 40 days for analysis\nafter extraction\nPCBs (method target SW-846 8082 Refer to Refer to Sample container\ncompound list) Table B.6 Table B.6 Amber glass -50 g of sample\nPreservative -4'C\nHolding time -1 year for extraction;\n1 year for analysis after extraction\nRCRA Metals (method EPA-600 200.8 Refer to Refer to Sample container\ntarget compound list) Table B.6 Table B.6 glass or plastic -10 g of sample\nTotal Metals (method SW-846 6010 Refer to Refer to Preservative -none, mercury 40C\ntarget compound list) Table B.6 Table B.6 Holding time -180 days; mercury\n28 days\nAnions (method target EPA-600 300.0 Refer to Refer to Sample container\ncompound list) Table B.6 Table B.6 glass or plastic -25 g of sample\nPreservative -none\nHolding time -6 months for\nextraction; 28 days for analysis\nafter extraction, nitrate and nitrite\n48 hours for analysis after\nextraction\nAddendum B.39\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nTable B.7. Sample Containers, Preservative Methods, and Holding Times for 200 Area ETF\nGenerated Waste\nAccuracy/\nAnalytical Method Precision Sample container'/Parameter MehdPL for2aoMethod PQL Mo d Preservative'/ Holding time2\n(percent)\nAmmonia EPA-600 Refer to Refer to Sample container\n300.7 Table B.6 Table B.6 glass or plastic -25 g of sample\nPreservative -none\nHolding time -6 months for\nextraction; 28 days for analysis\nafter extraction\npH SW-846 9045 ND ND Sample container\nglass or plastic -50 g of sample\nPreservative -none\nHolding time -none\nToxicity Characteristic SW-846 1311 NA NA Sample container\nLeaching Procedure' Refer to specific method being\nperformed after TCLP -125 g of\nsample\nPreservative -None (after TCLP,\npreserve extract per method being\nperformed)\nHolding time -Metals: 180 days for\nTCLP extraction, mercury 28 days\nfor TCLP extraction\nSVOA: 14 days for TCLP\nextraction (after TCLP, refer to\nspecific methods for time for\nanalysis after extraction)\n1 'Sample bottle, volumes, and preservatives could be adjusted, as applicable, for safety reasons\n2 2 Holding time equals time between sampling and analysis\n3 3 Extraction procedure, as applicable; extract analyzed by referenced methods [WAC 173-303-110(3)(c)]\n4 g= grams\n5 NA= not applicable\n6 PQL = practical quantitation limit\n7 mL = milliliter\n8 ND = not determined\n9 TCLP = toxicity characteristic leaching procedure\n10\nAddendum B.40\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nADDENDUM C\nPROCESS INFORMATION\nAddendum C.i\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum C.ii\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1\n2 ADDENDUM C\n3 PROCESS INFORMATION\n4\n5\n6 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n7 C. PROCESS INFORMATION.............................................6\n8 C.1 Liquid Effluent Retention Facility Process Description................ ........... 6\n9 C.2 Effluent Treatment Facility Process Description................................7\n10 C.2.1 Load-In Station......................................................8\n11 C.2.2 Effluent Treatment Facility Operating Configuration.............................8\n12 C.2.3 Primary Treatment Train........ ........................................ 8\n13 C.2.4 Secondary Treatment Train.............................................11\n14 C.2.5 Other Effluent Treatment Facility Systems...................................12\n15 C.3 Containers........................................................ 14\n16 C.3. Description of Containers............................................... 15\n17 C.3.2 Container Management Practices......................................... 15\n18 C.3.3 Container Labeling................................................... 16\n19 C.3.4 Containment Requirements for Managing Containers............................ 16\n20 CA Tank Systems....................................................... 17\n21 C.4.1 Design Requirements.................................................. 18\n22 C.4.2 Additional Requirements for New Tanks.......................... .......... 23\n23 C.4.3 Secondary Containment and Release Detection for Tank Systems...................23\n24 C.4.4 Tank Management Practices............................................28\n25 C.4.5 Labels or Signs.....................................................30\n26 C.4.6 Air Emissions .......................................................................................... 30\n27 C.4.7 Management of Ignitable or Reactive Wastes in Tanks Systems.....................30\n28 C.4.8 Management of Incompatible Wastes in Tanks Systems..........................31\n29 C.5 Surface Impoundments................................................31\n30 C.5.1 ListofDangerous Waste............................................... 31\n31 C.5.2 Construction, Operation, and Maintenance of Liner System....................... 31\n32 C.5.3 Prevention of Overtopping.............................................. 38\n33 C.5.4 Structural Integrity of Dikes............................................. 39\n34 C.5.5 Piping Systems..................................................... 41\n35 C.5.6 Double Liner and Leak Detection, Collection, and Removal System ........... ....... 42\n36 C.5.7 Construction Quality Assurance................................ ................ 43\nAddendum C.iii\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI C.5.8 Proposed Action Leakage Rate and Response Action Plan........................43\n2 C.5.9 Dike Structural Integrity Engineering Certification.............................43\n3 C.5.10 Management of Ignitable, Reactive, or Incompatible Wastes.............. ......... 43\n4 C.6 Air Emissions Control................................................43\n5 C.6.1 Applicability of Subpart AA Standards.................... ................. 44\n6 C.6.2 Process Vents -Demonstrating Compliance..................................44\n7 C.6.3 Applicability of Subpart CC Standards.....................................45\n8 C.7 Engineering Drawings................................................46\n9 C.7.1 Liquid Effluent Retention Facility........................................46\n10 C.7.2 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility......................................47\n11\n12 FIGURES\n13 Figure C. 1. Liquid Effluent Retention Facility Layout................................. 54\n14 Figure C.2. Plan View of the 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility......................... 55\n15 Figure C.3. 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility Layout............................... 56\n16 Figure C.4. 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility.....................................57\n17 Figure C.5. Example -200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility Configuration I.................. 58\n18 Figure C.6. Example -200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility Configuration 2...... ..................... 59\n19 Figure C.7. Surge Tank...................................................... 60\n20 Figure C.8. Ultraviolet Light/Oxidation Unit........................................61\n21 Figure C.9. Reverse Osmosis Unit............................................... 62\n22 Figure C.10. Ion Exchange Unit................................................ 63\n23 Figure C. 11. Verification Tanks ................................................... 64\n24 Figure C.12. Effluent Treatment Facility Evaporator.................................. 65\n25 Figure C.13. Thin Film Dryer .................................................... 66\n26 Figure C.14. Container Handling System.... .......................... ............ 67\n27 Figure C.15. Effluent Treatment Facility Sump Tanks .................................. 68\n28 Figure C. 16. Liner Anchor Wall and Cover Tension System ............................. 69\n29 Figure C.17. Liner System Schematic ............................................ 70\n30 Figure C.18. Detail of Leachate Collection Sump ........................... .......... 71\n31\n32 TABLES\n33 Table C.1. Liquid Effluent Retention Facility Containment System ............................... 46\n34 Table C.2. Liquid Effluent Retention Facility Piping and Instrumentation ............ ......... 47\n35 Table C.3. Effluent Treatment Facility and Load-In Station Secondary Containment Systems.......47\nAddendum C.iv\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 Table C.4. Major Process Units and Tanks at the Effluent Treatment Facility and Load-In\n2 Station.......................................................... 47\n3 Table C.5. 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility Tank Systems Information ........... ............ 49\n4 Table C.6. 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility Additional Tank System Information ............ 50\n5 Table C.7. Ancillary Equipment and Material Data ................................... 51\n6 Table C.8. Concrete and Masonary Coatings ............................................. 52\n7 Table C.9. Geomembrane Material Specifications ............................... ..... 52\n8 Table C.10. Drainage Gravel Specifications............................................ 53\n9\nAddendum C.v\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI C. PROCESS INFORMATION\n2 This addendum provides a detailed discussion of the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility (LERF) and\n3 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility (200 Area ETF) processes and equipment. The LERF and 200 Area\n4 ETF comprise an aqueous waste treatment system located in the 200 East Area that provides storage and\n5 treatment for a variety of aqueous mixed waste. This aqueous waste includes process condensate from\n6 the 242-A Evaporator and other aqueous waste generated from onsite remediation and waste management\n7 activities.\n8 The LERF consists of three lined surface impoundments, or basins. Aqueous waste from LERF is\n9 pumped to the 200 Area ETF for treatment in a series of process units, or systems, that remove or destroy\n10 essentially all of the dangerous waste constituents. The treated effluent is discharged to a State-Approved\n11 Land Disposal Site (SALDS) north of the 200 West Area, under the authority of a Washington State\n12 Waste Discharge Permit (Ecology 2000) and the Final Delisting (40 CFR 261, Appendix IX, Table 2).\n13 Both LERF and 200 Area ETF waste processing operations are controlled in a central Control room\n14 located in the 200 Area ETF building. The ETF control room is staffed continuously during ETF\n15 processing operations. Processing operations are defined as when liquid transfers of any sort are\n16 occurring to/from/within the LERF and ETF or when wastes are being treated at ETF'. Examples of\n17 processing operations include, but are not limited to, when liquid waste are transferred to/from the LERF\n18 basins [see section C. 1], during active liquid waste treatment/processing at the ETF (e.g., liquid waste\n19 treatment in tanks and liquid waste movement between primary and secondary treatment train processes\n20 and/or other ETF tanks [see Section C.2]), and liquid waste receipts at the load-in station [see Section\n21 C.2.1]). Section C.2.5.1 describes the centralized computer system (i.e., monitor and control system or\n22 MCS) that is located at the ETF control room and other locations at the ETF facility. This MCS monitors\n23 the performance of the ETF operations and records alarms from various equipment as described in this\n24 Addendum C and Addendum I, Inspection Requirements. At times when processing operations are not\n25 occurring, the ETF Control room is not manned continuously, and alarms are monitored daily as specified\n26 in Addendum I.\n27 C.1 Liquid Effluent Retention Facility Process Description\n28 Each of the three LERF basins has an operating capacity of 29.5-million liters. The LERF receives\n29 aqueous waste through several inlets including the following:\n30 * A pipeline that connects LERF with the 242-A Evaporator.\n31 * A pipeline from the 200 West Area.\n32 * A pipeline that connects LERF to the Load-In Station at the 200 Area ETF.\n33 * A series of sample ports located at each basin.\n34 Figure C.1 presents a general layout of LERF and associated pipelines. Aqueous waste from LERF is\n35 pumped to the 200 Area ETF through one of two double-walled fiberglass transfer pipelines. Effluent\n36 from the 200 Area ETF also can be transferred back to the LERF through one of these transfer pipelines.\n37 These pipelines are equipped with leak detection located in the annulus between the inner and outer pipes.\n38 In the event that these leak detectors are not in service, the pipelines are visually inspected during\n39 transfers for leakage by opening the secondary containment drain lines located at the 200 Area ETF end\n40 of the transfer pipelines.\n41 Each basin is equipped with six available sample risers constructed of 6-inch perforated pipe. A seventh\n42 sample riser in each basin is dedicated to influent aqueous waste receipt piping (except for aqueous waste\n43 received from the 242-A Evaporator), and an eighth riser in each basin contains liquid level\n44 instrumentation.\nI Liquid transfers does not include standard facility operations of liquid recirculation (e.g. for pump seals), sanitary water and\ncooling water, and outdoor rainwater management activities.\nAddendum C.6\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 Each riser extends along the sides of each basin from the top to the bottom of the basin and allows\n2 samples to be collected from any depth. Personnel access to these sample ports is from the perimeter area\n3 of the basins. A catch basin is provided at the northwest corner of each LERF basin for aboveground\n4 piping and manifolds for transfer pumps. Aqueous waste from the 242-A Evaporator is transferred\n5 through piping which ties into piping at the catch basins. Under routine operations, a submersible pump\n6 is used to transfer aqueous waste from a LERF basin to the 200 Area ETF for processing or for basin-to-\n7 basin transfers. This pump is connected to a fixed manifold on one of four available risers.\n8 Each basin consists of a multilayer liner system supported by a concrete anchor wall around the basin\n9 perimeter and a soil-bentonite clay underlayment. The multilayer liner system consists of a primary liner\n10 in contact with the aqueous waste, a layer of bentonite carpet, a geonet, a geotextile, a gravel layer, and a\n11 secondary liner that rests on the bentonite underlayment. Any aqueous waste leakage through the primary\n12 liner flows through the geonet and gravel to a leachate collection system. The leachate flows to a sump at\n13 the northwest corner of each basin, where the leachate is pumped up the side slope and back into the basin\n14 above the primary liner. Each liner is constructed of high-density polyethylene. A floating cover made of\n15 very low-density polyethylene is stretched over each basin above the primary liner. These covers serve to\n16 keep unwanted material from entering the basins, and to minimize evaporation of the liquid contents.\n17 C.2 Effluent Treatment Facility Process Description\n18 The 200 Area ETF is designed as a flexible treatment system that provides treatment for contaminants\n19 anticipated in process condensate and other onsite aqueous waste. The design influent flow rate into the\n20 200 Area ETF is approximately 570 liters per minute, with planned outages for activities such as\n21 maintenance on the 200 Area ETF systems. Maintenance outages typically are scheduled between\n22 treating a batch of aqueous waste, referred to as treatment campaigns. The effluent flow (or volume) is\n23 equivalent to the influent flow (or volume).\n24 The 200 Area ETF generally receives aqueous waste directly from the LERF. However, aqueous waste\n25 also can be transferred from tanker trucks at the Load-In Station to the 200 Area ETF and from containers\n26 (e.g., carboys, drums) directly to ETF. Aqueous waste is treated and stored in the 200 Area ETF process\n27 areas in a series of tank systems, referred to as process units. Within the ETF, waste also is managed in\n28 containers through treatment and/or storage. Figure C.2 provides the relative locations of the process and\n29 container storage areas within the ETF.\n30 The process units are grouped in either the primary or the secondary treatment train. The primary\n31 treatment train provides for the removal or destruction of contaminants. Typically, the secondary\n32 treatment train processes the waste by-products from the primary treatment train by reducing the volume\n33 of waste. In the secondary treatment train, contaminants are concentrated and dried to a powder. The\n34 liquid fraction is routed to the primary treatment train. Figure C.3 provides an overview of the layout of\n35 the ETF, 2025E Building). Figure C.4 presents the 200 Area ETF floor plan, the relative locations of the\n36 individual process units and associated tanks within the ETF, and the location of the Load-In Station.\n37 The dry powder waste and maintenance and operations waste are containerized and stored or treated in\n38 the container storage areas or in collection or treatment areas within the Process Area. Secondary\n39 containment is provided for all containers and tank systems (including ancillary equipment) housed\n40 within the ETF. The trenches and floor of the 200 Area ETF comprise the secondary containment system.\n41 The floor includes approximately a 15.2-centimeter rise (berm) along the containing walls of the process\n42 and container storage areas. Any spilled or leaked material from within the process area or container\n43 storage area is collected into trenches that feed into either sump tank I or sump tank 2.\n44 From these sump tanks, the spilled or leaked material (i.e., waste) is fed to either the surge tank and\n45 processed in the primary treatment train or the secondary waste receiving tanks and processed in the\n46 secondary treatment train. All tank systems outside of the 200 Area ETF are provided with a secondary\n47 containment system.\n48 In the following sections, several figures are provided that present general illustrations of the treatment\n49 units and the relation to the process.\nAddendum C.7\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 C.2.1 Load-in Station\n2 The 200 Area ETF receives aqueous waste from LERF or the Load-In Station. The 200 Area ETF\n3 Load-In Station, located due east of the surge tank and outside of the perimeter fence (Figure C.4), was\n4 designed and constructed to provide the capability to unload, store, and transfer aqueous waste to the\n5 LERF or 200 Area ETF from tanker trucks and other containers (such as drums). The Load-In Station\n6 consists of two truck bays equipped with load-in tanks, transfer pumps, filtration system, level\n7 instrumentation for tanker trucks, leak detection capabilities for the containment basin and transfer line,\n8 and an underground transfer line that connects to lines in the surge tank berm, allowing transfers to either\n9 the 200 Area ETF surge tank or LERF. The Load-In Station is covered with a steel building for weather\n10 protection. Tanker trucks and other containers are used to unload aqueous waste at the Load-In Station.\n11 To perform unloading, the tanker truck is positioned on a truck pad, a 'load-in' transfer line is connected\n12 to the truck, and the tanker contents are pumped into one of the Load-In Station tanks, the surge tank, or\n13 directly to the LERF. For container unloading, the container is placed on the truck pad and the container\n14 contents are pumped into one of the Load-In Station tanks, the surge tank, or directly to the LERF.\n15 During unloading operations, solids may be removed from the waste by pumping the contents of the\n16 tanker truck or container through a filtration system. If solids removal is not needed, the filtration system\n17 is not used and the solution is transferred directly to the Load-In Station tanks, surge tank, or to LERF.\n18 Any leaks at the Load-In Station drain to the sump. A leak detector in the sump alarms locally and in the\n19 200 Area ETF control room. Alarms are monitored continuously in the control room during Load-in\n20 Station transfers and at least daily at times when waste is not being received at the Load-In Station.\n21 Alternatively, leaks can be visually detected.\n22 C.2.2 Effluent Treatment Facility Operating Configuration\n23 Because the operating configuration of the 200 Area ETF can be adjusted or modified, most aqueous\n24 waste streams can be effectively treated to below Delisting and Discharge Permit limits. The operating\n25 configuration of the 200 Area ETF depends on the unique chemistry of an aqueous waste stream(s).\n26 Before an aqueous waste stream is accepted for treatment, the waste is characterized and evaluated.\n27 Information from the characterization is used to adjust the treatment process or change the configuration\n28 of the 200 Area ETF process units, as necessary, to optimize the treatment process for a particular\n29 aqueous waste stream.\n30 Typically, an aqueous waste is processed first in the primary treatment train, where the 200 Area ETF is\n31 configured to process an aqueous waste through the UV/OX unit first, followed by the RO unit.\n32 However, under an alternate configuration, an aqueous waste could be processed in the RO unit first. For\n33 example, high concentrations of nitrates in an aqueous waste might interfere with the performance of the\n34 UV/OX. In this case, the 200 Area ETF could be configured to process the waste in the RO unit before\n35 the UV/OX unit.\n36 The flexibility of the 200 Area ETF also allows some aqueous waste to be processed in the secondary\n37 treatment train first. For example, for small volume aqueous waste with high concentrations of some\n38 anions and metals, the approach could be to first process the waste stream in the secondary treatment\n39 train. This approach would prevent premature fouling or scaling of the RO unit. The liquid portion (i.e.,\n40 untreated overheads from the 200 Area ETF evaporator and thin film dryer) would be sent to the primary\n41 treatment train.\n42 Figure C.5 and Figure C.6 provide example process flow diagrams for two different operating\n43 configurations.\n44 C.2.3 Primary Treatment Train\n45 The primary treatment train consists of the following processes:\n46 * Influent Receipt/Surge tank -inlet, surge capacity.\n47 * Filtration -for suspended solids removal.\nAddendum C.8\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 * UV/OX -organic destruction.\n2 * pH adjustment -waste neutralization.\n3 * Hydrogen peroxide decomposition -removal of excess hydrogen peroxide.\n4 * Degasification -removal of carbon dioxide.\n5 * RO -removal of dissolved solids.\n6 * IX -removal of dissolved solids.\n7 * Verification -holding tanks during verification.\n8 Influent Receipt/Surge Tank. Depending on the configuration of the ETF, the surge tank is one inlet\n9 used to feed an aqueous waste into the 200 Area ETF for treatment. In Configuration 1 (Figure C.5), the\n10 surge tank is the first component downstream of the LERF. The surge tank provides a storage/surge\n11 volume for chemical pretreatment and controls feed flow rates from the LERF to the 200 Area ETF.\n12 However, in Configuration 2 (Figure C.6), aqueous waste from LERF is fed directly into the treatment\n13 units. In this configuration, the surge tank receives aqueous waste, which has been processed in the RO\n14 units, and provides the feed stream to the remaining downstream process units. In yet another\n15 configuration, some small volume aqueous waste could be received into the secondary treatment train\n16 first for processing. In this case, the aqueous waste would be received directly into the secondary waste\n17 receiving tanks. Finally, the surge tank also receives waste extracted from various systems within the\n18 primary and secondary treatment train while in operation.\n19 The surge tank is located outside the 200 Area ETF on the south side. In the surge tank (Fiyure C.7), the\n20 pH of an aqueous waste is adjusted using the metered addition of sulfuric acid and sodium hydroxide, as\n21 necessary, to prepare the waste for treatment in downstream processes. In addition, hydrogen peroxide or\n22 biocides could be added to control biological growth in the surge tank. A pump recirculates the contents\n23 in the surge tank, mixing the chemical reagents with the waste to a uniform pH.\n24 Filtration. Two primary filter systems remove suspended particles in an aqueous waste: a rough filter\n25 removes the larger particulates, while a fine filter removes the smaller particulates. The location of these\n26 filters depends on the configuration of the primary treatment train. However, the filters normally are\n27 located upstream of the RO units.\n28 The solids accumulating on these filter elements are backwashed to the secondary waste receiving tanks\n29 with pulses of compressed air and water, forcing water back through the filter. The backwash operation is\n30 initiated either automatically by a rise in differential pressure across the filter or manually by an operator.\n31 The filters are cleaned chemically when the backwashing process does not facilitate acceptable filter\n32 performance.\n33 Auxiliary fine and rough filters (e.g., disposable filters) have been installed to provide additional filtration\n34 capabilities. Depending on the configuration of the ETF, the auxiliary filters are operated either in series\n35 with the primary filters to provide additional filtration or in parallel, instead of the primary fine and rough\n36 filters, to allow cleaning/maintenance of the primary fine and rough filters while the primary treatment\n37 train is in operation.\n38 Ultraviolet Light/Oxidation. Organic compounds contained in an aqueous waste stream are destroyed\n39 in the UV/OX system (Fiaure C.8). Hydrogen peroxide is mixed with the waste.\n40 The UV/OX system uses the photochemical reaction of UV light on hydrogen peroxide to form hydroxyl\n41 radicals and other reactive species that oxidize the organic compounds. The final products of the\n42 complete reaction are carbon dioxide, water, and inorganic ions.\n43 Organic destruction is accomplished in two UV/OX units operating in parallel. During the UV/OX\n44 process, the aqueous waste passes through reaction chambers where hydrogen peroxide is added. While\n45 in the UV/OX system, the temperature of an aqueous waste is monitored. Heat exchangers are used to\n46 reduce the temperature of the waste should the temperature of the waste approach the upper limits for the\n47 UV/OX or RO systems.\nAddendum C.9\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 pH Adjustment. The pH of a waste stream is monitored and controlled at different points throughout the\n2 treatment process. Within the primary treatment train, the pH of a waste can be adjusted with sulfuric\n3 acid or sodium hydroxide to optimize operation of downstream treatment processes or adjusted before\n4 final discharge. For example, the pH of an aqueous waste would be adjusted in the pH adjustment tank\n5 after the UV/OX process and before the RO process. In this example, pH is adjusted to cause certain\n6 chemical species such as ammonia to form ammonium sulfate, thereby increasing the rejection rate of the\n7 RO.\n8 Hydrogen Peroxide Decomposition. Typically, hydrogen peroxide added into the UV/OX system is not\n9 consumed completely by the system. Because hydrogen peroxide is a strong oxidizer, the residual\n10 hydrogen peroxide from the UV/OX system is removed to protect the downstream equipment. The\n11 hydrogen peroxide decomposer uses a catalyst to break down the hydrogen peroxide that is not consumed\n12 completely in the process of organic destruction. The aqueous waste is sent through a column that breaks\n13 down the hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen. The gas generated by the decomposition of the\n14 hydrogen peroxide is vented to the vessel off gas system.\n15 Degasification. The degasification column is used to purge dissolved carbon dioxide from the aqueous\n16 waste to reduce the carbonate loading to downstream dissolved solids removal processes within the\n17 200 Area ETF primary treatment train. The purged carbon dioxide is vented to the vessel off gas system.\n18 Reverse Osmosis. The RO system (Figure C.9) uses pressure to force clean water molecules through\n19 semi-permeable membranes while keeping the larger molecule contaminants, such as dissolved solids,\n20 and large molecular weight organic materials, in the membrane. The RO process uses a staged\n21 configuration to maximize water recovery. The process produces two separate streams, including a clean\n22 'permeate' and a concentrate (or retentate), which are concentrated as much as possible to minimize the\n23 amount of secondary waste produced.\n24 The RO process is divided into first and second stages. Aqueous waste is fed to the first RO stage from\n25 the RO feed tank. The secondary waste receiving tanks of the secondary treatment train receive the\n26 retentate removed from the first RO stage, while the second RO stage receives the permeate (i.e., 'treated'\n27 aqueous waste from the first RO stage). In the second RO stage, the retentate is sent to the first stage RO\n28 feed tank while the permeate is sent to the IX system or to the surge tank, depending on the configuration\n29 of the ETF.\n30 Two support systems facilitate this process. An anti-scale system injects scale inhibitors as needed into\n31 the feed waste to prevent scale from forming on the membrane surface. A clean-in-place system using\n32 cleaning agents, such as descalants and surfactants, cleans the membrane pores of surface and subsurface\n33 deposits that have fouled the membranes.\n34 Ion Exchange. Because the RO process removes most of the dissolved solids in an aqueous waste, the\n35 IX process (Figure C.10) acts as a polishing unit. The IX system consists of three columns containing\n36 beds of cation and/or anion resins. This system is designed to allow for regeneration of resins and\n37 maintenance of one column while the other two are in operation. Though the two columns generally are\n38 operated in series, the two columns also can be operated in parallel or individually.\n39 Typically, the two columns in operation are arranged in a primary/secondary (lead/lag) configuration, and\n40 the third (regenerated) column is maintained in standby.\n41 When dissolved solids breakthrough the first IX column and are detected by a conductivity sensor, this\n42 column is removed from service for regeneration, and the second column replaces the first column and\n43 the third column is placed into service. The column normally is regenerated using sulfuric acid and\n44 sodium hydroxide. The resulting regeneration waste is collected in the secondary waste receiving tanks.\n45 Spent resins are transferred into a disposal container should regeneration of the IX resins become\n46 inefficient Free water is removed from the container and returned to the surge tank. Dewatered resins are\n47 transferred to a final storage/disposal point.\nAddendum C.10\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI Verification. The three verification tanks (Figure C. 11) are used to hold the treated effluent while a\n2 determination is made that the effluent meets discharge limits. The effluent can be returned to the\n3 primary treatment train for additional treatment, or to the LERF, should a treated effluent not meet\n4 Discharge Permit or Final Delisting requirements.\n5 The three verification tanks alternate between three operating modes: receiving treated effluent, holding\n6 treated effluent during laboratory analysis and verification, or discharging verified effluent. Treated\n7 effluent may also be returned to the 200 Area ETF to provide 'clean' service water for operational and\n8 maintenance functions, e.g., for boiler water and for backwashing the filters. This recycling keeps the\n9 quantity of fresh water used to a minimum.\n10 C.2.4 Secondary Treatment Train\n11 The secondary treatment system typically receives and processes the following by-products generated\n12 from the primary treatment train: concentrate from the first RO stage, filter backwash, regeneration waste\n13 from the ion exchange system, and spillage or overflow received into the process sumps. Depending on\n14 the operating configuration, however, some aqueous waste could be processed in the secondary treatment\n15 train before the primary treatment train (refer to Figure C.5 and Figure C.6 for example operating\n16 configurations).\n17 The secondary treatment train provides the following processes:\n18 * Secondary waste receiving -tank receiving and chemical addition.\n19 * Evaporation -concentrates secondary waste streams.\n20 * Concentrate staging -concentrate receipt, pH adjustment, and chemical addition.\n21 * Thin film drying -dewatering of secondary waste streams.\n22 * Container handling -packaging of dewatered secondary waste.\n23 Secondary Waste Receiving. Waste to be processed in the secondary treatment train is received into two\n24 secondary waste receiving tanks, where the pH can be adjusted with sulfuric acid or sodium hydroxide for\n25 optimum evaporator performance. Chemicals, such as reducing agents, may be added to waste in the\n26 secondary waste receiving tanks to reduce the toxicity or mobility of constituents in the powder.\n27 Evaporation. The 200 Area ETF evaporator is fed alternately by the two secondary waste receiving\n28 tanks. One tank serves as a waste receiver while the other tank is operated as the feed tank. The\n29 200 Area ETF evaporator vessel (also referred to as the vapor body) is the principal component of the\n30 evaporation process (Figure C.12).\n31 Feed from the secondary waste receiving tanks is pumped through a heater to the recirculation loop of the\n32 200 Area ETF evaporator. In this loop, concentrated waste is recirculated from the 200 Area ETF\n33 evaporator, to a heater, and back into the evaporator where vaporization occurs. As water leaves the\n34 evaporator system in the vapor phase, the concentration of the waste in the evaporator increases. When\n35 the concentration of the waste reaches the appropriate density, a portion of the concentrate is pumped to\n36 one of the concentrate tanks.\n37 The vapor that is released from the 200 Area ETF evaporator is routed to the entrainment separator, where\n38 water droplets and/or particulates are separated from the vapor. The 'cleaned' vapor is routed to the vapor\n39 compressor and converted to steam.\n40 The steam from the vapor compressor is sent to the heater (reboiler) and used to heat the recirculating\n41 concentrate in the 200 Area ETF evaporator. From the heater, the steam is condensed and fed to the\n42 distillate flash tank, where the saturated condensate received from the heater drops to atmospheric\n43 pressure and cools to the normal boiling point through partial flashing (rapid vaporization caused by a\n44 pressure reduction). The resulting distillate is routed to the surge tank. The non-condensable vapors,\n45 such as air, are vented through a vent gas cooler to the vessel off gas system.\nAddendum C. 11\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI Concentrate Staging. The concentrate tanks make up the head end of the thin film drying process. From\n2 the 200 Area ETF evaporator, concentrate is pumped into two concentrate tanks, and pH adjusted\n3 chemicals, such as reducing agents, may be added to reduce the toxicity or mobility of constituents when\n4 converted to powder. Waste is transferred from the concentrate tanks to the thin film dryer for conversion\n5 to a powder. The concentrate tanks function alternately between concentrate receiver and feed tank for\n6 the thin film dryer. However, one tank may serve as both concentrate receiver and feed tank.\n7 Because low solubility solids (i.e., calcium and magnesium sulfate) tend to settle in the concentrate tanks,\n8 these solids must be removed to prevent fouling and to protect the thin film dryer, and to maintain\n9 concentrate tank capacity.\n10 Thin Film Drying. From the concentrate tanks, feed is pumped to the thin film dryer (Figure C.13) that\n11 is heated by steam. As the concentrated waste flows down the length of the dryer, the waste is dried. The\n12 dried film, or powder, is scraped off the dryer cylinder by blades attached to a rotating shaft. The powder\n13 is funneled through a cone-shaped powder hopper at the bottom of the dryer and into the Container\n14 Handling System.\n15 Overhead vapor released by the drying of the concentrate is condensed in the distillate condenser. Excess\n16 heat is removed from the distillate by a water-cooled heat exchanger. Part of the distillate is circulated\n17 back to the condenser spray nozzles. The remaining distillate is pumped to the surge tank. Any\n18 noncondensible vapors and particulates from the spray condenser are exhausted to the vessel off gas\n19 system.\n20 Container Handling. Before an empty container is moved into the Container Handling System\n21 (Figure C.14), the lid is removed and the container is placed on a conveyor. The containers are moved\n22 into the container filling area after passing through an air lock. The empty container is located under the\n23 thin film dryer, and raised into position. The container is sealed to the thin film dryer and a rotary valve\n24 begins the transfer of powder to the empty container. Air displaced from the container is vented to the\n25 distillate condenser attached to the 200 Area ETF evaporator that exhausts to the vessel off gas system.\n26 The container is filled to a predetermined level, then lowered from the thin film dryer and moved along a\n27 conveyor. The filled container is manually recapped, and moved along the conveyor to the airlock. At\n28 the airlock, the container is moved onto the conveyor by remote control. The airlock is opened, the smear\n29 sample (surface wipe) is taken, and the contamination level counted. A 'C' ring is installed to secure the\n30 container lid. If the container has contaminated material on the outside, the container is wiped down and\n31 retested. Filled containers that pass the smear test are labeled, placed on pallets, and moved by forklift to\n32 the filled container storage area. Section C.3 provides a more detailed discussion of container handling.\n33 C.2.5 Other Effluent Treatment Facility Systems\n34 The 200 Area ETF is provided with support systems that facilitate treatment in the primary and secondary\n35 treatment trains and that provide for worker safety and environmental protection. An overview of the\n36 following systems is provided:\n37 * Monitor and control system\n38 * Vessel off gas system\n39 * Sump collection system\n40 * Chemical injection feed system\n41 * Verification tank recycle system\n42 * Utilities\n43 C.2.5.1 Monitor and Control System\n44 The operation of the 200 Area ETF is monitored and controlled by a centralized computer system\n45 (i.e., monitor and control system or MCS).\nAddendum C.12\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI The MCS continuously monitors data from various field indicators, such as pH, flow, tank level,\n2 temperature, pressure, conductivity, alarm status, and valve switch positions. Data gathered by the MCS\n3 enable operations and engineering personnel to document and adjust the operation of the ETF.\n4 Emergency communications equipment and warning systems (e.g. fire alarms and evacuation alarms) are\n5 included in Addendum J, Contingency Plan. These emergency response notification alarms are\n6 monitored continuously at central Hanford Facility locations (e.g. Hanford Fire Station) and do not rely\n7 on staff being present in the ETF control room for notification and response.\n8 C.2.5.2 Vessel Off gas System\n9 Ventilation for various tanks and vessels is provided through the vessel off gas system. The system\n10 includes a moisture separator, duct heater, pre-filter, high-efficiency particulate air filters, carbon absorber\n11 (when required to reduce organic emissions), exhaust fans, and ductwork. Gasses ventilated from the\n12 tanks and vessels enter the exhaust system through the connected ductwork. The vessel off gas system\n13 draws vapors and gasses off the following tanks and treatment systems:\n14 * Surge tank\n15 * Vent gas cooler (off the ETF evaporator/distillate flash tank)\n16 * pH adjustment tank\n17 * Concentrate tanks\n18 * Degasification system\n19 * First and second RO stages\n20 * Dry powder hopper\n21 * Effluent pH adjustment tank\n22 * Drum capping station\n23 * Secondary waste receiving tanks\n24 * Distillate condenser (off the thin film dryer)\n25 * Sump tanks 1 and 2\n26 The vessel off gas system maintains a negative pressure with respect to the atmosphere, which produces a\n27 slight vacuum within tanks, vessels, and ancillary equipment for the containment of gas vapor. This\n28 system also provides for the collection, monitoring, and treatment of confined airborne in-vessel\n29 contaminants to preclude over-pressurization. The high-efficiency particulate air filters remove\n30 particulates and condensate from the air stream before these are discharged to the heating, ventilation, and\n31 air conditioning system.\n32 C.2.5.3 Sump Collection System\n33 Sump tanks I and 2 compose the sump collection system that provides containment of waste streams and\n34 liquid overflow associated with the 200 Area ETF processes. The process area floor is sloped to two\n35 separate trenches that each drain to a sump tank located under the floor of the 200 Area ETF\n36 (Figure C.15). One trench runs the length of the primary treatment train and drains to Sump Tank 2,\n37 located underneath the verification tank pump floor. The second trench collects spillage primarily from\n38 the secondary treatment train and flows to Sump Tank 1, located near the 200 Area ETF evaporator.\n39 Sump tanks I and 2 are located below floor level (Figure C. 15). An eductor in these tanks prevents\n40 sludge from accumulating.\n41 C.2.5.4 Chemical Injection Feed System\n42 At several points within the primary and secondary treatment trains, sulfuric acid and sodium hydroxide\n43 (or dilute solutions of these reagents) are metered into specific process units to adjust the pH. For\n44 example, a dilute solution of 4 percent sulfuric acid and 4 percent sodium hydroxide could be added to\n45 the secondary waste receiving tanks to optimize the evaporation process.\nAddendum C.13\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI C.2.5.5 Verification Tank Recycle System\n2 To reduce the amount of water added to the process, verification tank water (i.e., verified effluent) is\n3 recycled throughout the 200 Area ETF process. Tanks and ancillary equipment that use verification tank\n4 water include:\n5 * 4 percent H2SO4 solution tank and ancillary equipment.\n6 * 4 percent NaOH solution tank and ancillary equipment.\n7 * Clean-in-place tank and ancillary equipment.\n8 * IX columns (during resin regeneration).\n9 * 200 Area ETF evaporator boiler and ancillary equipment.\n10 * Thin film dryer boiler and ancillary equipment\n11 * Seal water system.\n12 In addition, verification tank water is used extensively during maintenance activities. For example, it may\n13 be used to flush piping systems or to confirm the integrity of piping, a process tank or tank truck.\n14 C.2.5.6 Utilities\n15 The 200 Area ETF maintains the following utility supply systems required for the operation of the ETF:\n16 * Cooling water system -removes heat from process water via heat exchangers and a cooling\n17 tower.\n18 * Compressed air system -provides air to process equipment and instrumentation.\n19 * Seal water system -provides cool, clean, pressurized water to process equipment for pump seal\n20 cooling and pump seal lubrication, and provides protection against failure and fluid leakage.\n21 * Demineralized water system -removes solids from raw water system to produce high quality, low\n22 ion-content, water for steam boilers, and for the hydrogen peroxide feed system.\n23 * Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning system -provides continuous heating, cooling, and air\n24 humidity control throughout the ETF.\n25 The following utilities support 200 Area ETF activities:\n26 * Electrical power\n27 * Sanitary water\n28 * Communication systems\n29 * Raw water\n30 C.3 Containers\n31 This section provides specific information on container storage and treatment operations at the 200 Area\n32 ETF, including descriptions of containers, labeling, and secondary containment structures.\n33 A list of dangerous and/or mixed waste managed in containers at the 200 Area ETF is presented in\n34 Addendum A. The types of dangerous and/or mixed waste managed in containers in the 200 Area ETF\n35 could include:\n36 * Secondary waste powder generated from the treatment process.\n37 * Aqueous waste received from other Hanford site sources awaiting treatment.\n38 * Miscellaneous waste generated by operations and maintenance activities.\n39 The secondary treatment train processes the waste by-products from the primary treatment train, which\n40 are concentrated and dried into a powder. Containers are filled with dry powder waste from the thin film\n41 dryer via a remotely controlled system. Containers of aqueous waste received from other Hanford site\n42 sources are stored at 200 Area ETF until their contents can be transferred to the process for treatment.\nAddendum C.14\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 The waste is usually transferred to the secondary waste receiving or concentration tanks. Miscellaneous\n2 waste generated from maintenance and operations activities are stored at the ETF. The waste could\n3 include process waste, such as used filter elements; spent RO membranes; damaged equipment, and\n4 decontamination and maintenance waste, such as contaminated rags, gloves, and other personal protective\n5 equipment. Containers of miscellaneous waste which have free liquids generally are packaged with\n6 absorbents.\n7 Several container collection areas could be located within the 200 Area ETF process and container\n8 handling areas. These collection areas are used only to accumulate waste in containers. Once a container\n9 is filled, the container is transferred to a container storage area (Figure C.3 and Figure C.4), to another\n10 TSD unit, or to a less-than-90-day storage pad. Containers stored in the additional storage area\n11 (Figure C.4) are elevated or otherwise protected from contact with accumulated liquids. The container\n12 storage area within 200 Area ETF is a 22.9 x 8.5-meter room located adjacent to the 200 Area ETF\n13 process areas. The containers within the container storage area are clearly labeled, and access to these\n14 containers is limited by barriers and by administrative controls. The 200 Area ETF floor provides\n15 secondary containment, and the 200 Area ETF roof and walls protects all containers from exposure to the\n16 elements.\n17 Waste also could be placed in containers for treatment as indicated in Addendum A. For example, sludge\n18 that accumulates in the bottoms of the process tanks is removed periodically and placed into containers.\n19 In this example, the waste is solidified by decanting the supemate from the container and the remainder of\n20 the waste is allowed to evaporate, or absorbents are added, as necessary, to address remaining liquids.\n21 Following treatment, this waste either is stored at the 200 Area ETF or transferred to another treatment,\n22 storage, and disposal (TSD) unit.\n23 C.3.1 Description of Containers\n24 The containers used to collect and store dry powder waste are 208-liter steel containers. Most of the\n25 aqueous waste received at 200 Area ETF, and maintenance and operation waste generated, are stored in\n26 208-liter steel or plastic containers; however, in a few cases, the size of the container could vary to\n27 accommodate the size of a particular waste. For example, some process waste, such as spent filters,\n28 might not fit into a 208-liter container. In the case of spent resin from the IX columns, the resin is\n29 dewatered, and could be packaged in a special disposal container. In these few cases, specially sized\n30 containers could be required. In all cases, however, only approved containers are used and are compatible\n31 with the associated waste. Typically, 208-liter containers are used for treatment.\n32 Current operating practices indicate the use of new 208-liter containers that have either a polyethylene\n33 liner or a protective coating. Any reused or reconditioned container is inspected for container integrity\n34 before use. Overpack containers are available for use with damaged containers. Overpack containers\n35 typically are unlined steel or polyethylene.\n36 Per Addendum A, a maximum of 147,630 liters of dangerous and/or mixed waste could be stored in\n37 containers in the 200 Area ETF.\n38 C.3.2 Container Management Practices\n39 Before use, each container is checked for signs of damage such as dents, distortion, corrosion, or\n40 scratched coating.\n41 For dry powder loading, empty containers on pallets are raised by a forklift and manually placed on the\n42 conveyor that transports the containers to the automatic filling station in the container handling room\n43 (Figure C.14). The container lids are removed and replaced manually following the filling sequence.\n44 After filling, containers exit the container handling room via the filled drum conveyor. Locking rings are\n45 installed, the container label is affixed, and the container is moved by dolly or forklift to the container\n46 storage area.\n47\nAddendum C.15\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 Before receipt at 200 Area ETF, each container from other Hanford site sources is inspected for leaks,\n2 signs of damage, and a loose lid. The identification number on each container is checked to ensure the\n3 proper container is received. The containers are typically placed on pallets and moved by dolly or forklift\n4 to the container storage area. These containers are later moved to the process area and the contents\n5 transferred to the process for treatment.\n6 Containers used for storing maintenance and operations secondary waste are labeled before being placed\n7 in the container storage area or in a collection area. Lids are secured on these containers when not being\n8 filled. When the containers in a collection area are full, the containers are transferred by dolly or forklift\n9 to the container storage area or to an appropriate TSD unit. Containers used for treating waste also are\n10 labeled. The lids on these containers are removed as required to allow for treatment. During treatment,\n11 access to these containers is controlled through physical barriers and/or administrative controls.\n12 The filled containers in the container storage area are inventoried, checked for proper labeling, and placed\n13 on pallets or in a separate containment device as necessary. Each pallet is moved by forklift. Within the\n14 container storage area, palletized containers are stacked no more than three pallets high and in rows no\n15 more than two containers wide. Unobstructed aisles with a minimum of 76-centimeter aisle space\n16 separate rows.\n17 C.3.3 Container Labeling\n18 Labels are affixed on containers used to store dry powder when the containers leave the container\n19 handling room. Labels are affixed on other waste containers before use. Every container is labeled with\n20 the date that the container was filled. Appropriate major risk labels, such as \"corrosive\", \"toxic\", or\n21 \"F-listed\", also are added. Each container also has a label with an identification number for tracking\n22 purposes.\n23 C.3.4 Containment Requirements for Managing Containers\n24 Secondary containment is provided in the container management areas within the ETF. The secondary\n25 containment provided for tank systems also serves the container management areas. This section\n26 describes the design and operation of the secondary containment structure for these areas.\n27 C.3.4.1 Secondary Containment System Design\n28 For the container management areas, the reinforced concrete floor and a 15.2-centimeter rise (berm) along\n29 the walls of the container storage area of the 200 Area ETF provides secondary containment. The\n30 engineering assessment required for tanks (Mausshardt 1995) also describes the design and construction\n31 of the secondary containment provided for the 200 Area ETF container management areas. All systems\n32 were designed to national codes and standards (e.g., American Society for Testing Materials, American\n33 Concrete Institute standards).\n34 The floor is composed of cast-in-place, pre-formed concrete slabs, and has a minimum thickness of 15.2\n35 centimeters. All slab joints and floor and wall joints have water stops installed at the mid-depth of the\n36 slab. In addition, filler was applied to each joint. The floor and berms are coated with a chemically\n37 resistant; high-solids epoxy coating system consisting of primer and top coating. This coating material is\n38 compatible with the waste managed in containers and is an integral part of the secondary containment\n39 system for containers.\n40 The floor is sloped to drain any solution in the container storage area to floor drains along the west wall.\n41 Each floor drain consists of a grating over a 20.3-centimeter diameter drain port connected to a 4-inch\n42 polyvinyl chloride transfer pipe. The pipe passes under this wall and connects to a trench running along\n43 the east wall of the adjacent process area. This trench drains solution to sump tank 1.\n44 The container storage area is separated from the process area by a common wall and a door for access to\n45 the two areas (Figure C.3). These two areas also share a common floor and trenches that, with the\n46 15.2-centimeter rise of the containing walls, form the secondary containment system for the process area\n47 and the container storage area.\nAddendum C.16\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI C.3.4.2 Structural Integrity of Base\n2 Engineering calculations were performed showing the floor of the container storage area is capable of\n3 supporting the weight of containers. These calculations were reviewed and certified by a professional\n4 engineer (Mausshardt 1995). The concrete was inspected for damage during construction. Cracks were\n5 identified and repaired to the satisfaction of the professional engineer. Documentation of these\n6 certifications is included in the engineering assessment (Mausshardt 1995).\n7 C.3.4.3 Containment System Capacity\n8 The container storage area is primarily used to store dry powder, aqueous waste awaiting treatment, and\n9 maintenance and operation waste. Where appropriate, absorbents are added to fix any trace liquids\n10 present. Large volumes of liquid are not stored in the container storage area. However, liquids might be\n11 present in those containers that are in the treatment process. The maximum volume of waste that can be\n12 stored in containers in the container storage area is 147,630 liters.\n13 Because they are interconnected by floor drains, both the process area and the container storage area are\n14 considered in the containment system capacity. The volume available for secondary containment in the\n15 process area is approximately 68,000 liters, as discussed in the engineering assessment (Mausshardt\n16 1995). Using the dimensions of the container storage area (23.6 by 8.5 by 0.2 meters), and assuming that\n17 50 percent of the floor area is occupied by containers, the volume of the container storage area is\n18 15,300 liters. The Truck Bay loading areas (see Figure C.4) also provides 10,500 liters of containment as\n19 it is connected to the other two areas. The combined volume of the Truck Bay loading areas and process\n20 area, and container handling area available for secondary containment, is 93,800 liters. This volume is\n21 greater than 10 percent of the maximum total volume of containers allowed for storage in the ETF, as\n22 discussed previously.\n23 C.3.4.4 Control of Run-on\n24 The container management areas are located within the ETF, which serves to prevent run-on of\n25 precipitation.\n26 C.3.4.5 Removal of Liquids from Containment Systems\n27 The container storage area is equipped with drains that route solution to a trench in the process area,\n28 which drains to sump tank 1. The sump tanks are equipped with alarms that notify operating personnel\n29 that a leak is occurring. The sump tanks also are equipped with pumps to transfer waste to the surge tank\n30 or the secondary treatment train.\n31 C.3.4.6 Prevention of Ignitable, Reactive, and Incompatible Wastes in Containers\n32 Individual waste types (i.e., ignitable, corrosive, and reactive) are stored in separate containers. A waste\n33 that could be incompatible with other wastes is separated and protected from the incompatible waste.\n34 Incompatible wastes are evaluated using the methodology documented in 40 CFR 264, Appendix V. For\n35 example, acidic and caustic wastes are stored in separate containers. Free liquids are absorbed in\n36 miscellaneous waste containers that hold incompatible waste. Additionally, ETF-specific packaging\n37 requirements for these types of waste provide extra containment with each individual container. For\n38 example, each item of acidic waste is individually bagged and sealed within a lined container.\n39 C.4 Tank Systems\n40 This section provides specific information on tank systems and process units. This section also includes a\n41 discussion on the types of waste to be managed in the tanks, tank design information, integrity\n42 assessments, and additional information on the 200 Area ETF tanks that treat and store dangerous and/or\n43 mixed waste. The 200 Area ETF dangerous waste tanks are identified in Section C.4.1.1, and the relative\n44 locations of the tanks and process units in the 200 Area ETF are presented in Figure C.3.\nAddendum C.17\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI C.4.1 Design Requirements\n2 The following sections provide an overview of the design specifications for the tanks within the ETF. A\n3 separate discussion on the design of the process units also is provided. In accordance with the new tank\n4 system requirements of WAC 173-303-640(3), the following tank components and specifications were\n5 assessed:\n6 * Dimensions, capacities, wall thicknesses, and pipe connections.\n7 * Materials of construction and linings and compatibility of materials with the waste being\n8 processed.\n9 * Materials of construction of foundations and structural supports.\n10 * Review of design codes and standards used in construction.\n11 * Review of structural design calculations, including seismic design basis.\n12 * Waste characteristics and the effects of waste on corrosion.\n13 This assessment was documented in the Final RCRA Information Needs Report (Mausshardt 1995; the\n14 engineering assessment performed for the 200 Area ETF tank systems by an independent professional\n15 engineer. A similar assessment of design requirements was performed for Load-in tanks 59A-TK-109\n16 and -117 and is documented in 200 Area Effluent BAT/AKART Implementation, ETF Truck Load-in\n17 Facility, Project W-291H Integrity Assessment Report (KEH 1994). An assessment was also performed\n18 when Load-in tank 59A-TK-1 was placed into service for receipt of dangerous and mixed wastes. The\n19 assessment is documented in 200 Area ETF Purgewater Unloading Facility Tank System Integrity\n20 Assessment (HNF 2009a).\n21 The specifications for the preparation, design, and construction of the tank systems at the 200 Area ETF\n22 are documented in the Design Construction Specification, Project C-018H, 242-A Evaporator/PUREX\n23 Plant Process Condensate Treatment Facility (WHC 1992a). The preparation, design, and construction\n24 of Load-in tanks 59A-TK-109 and -117 are provided in the construction specifications in Project W-291,\n25 200 Area Effluent BAT/AKART Implementation ETF Truck Load-in Facility (KEH 1994). The\n26 preparation, design and construction of Load-in 59A-TK-1 are documented in Purgewater Unloading\n27 Facility Project Documentation (HNF 2009b).\n28 Most of the tanks in the 200 Area ETF are constructed of stainless steel. According to the design of the\n29 ETF, it was determined stainless steel would provide adequate corrosion protection for these tanks.\n30 Exceptions include Load-in tank 59A-TK-1, which is constructed of fiberglass-reinforced plastic and the\n31 verification tanks, which are constructed of carbon steel with an epoxy coating. The 200 Area ETF\n32 evaporator/vapor body (and the internal surfaces of the thin film dryer) is constructed of a corrosion\n33 resistant alloy, known as alloy 625, to address the specific corrosion concerns in the secondary treatment\n34 train. Finally, the hydrogen peroxide decomposer vessels are constructed of carbon steel and coated with\n35 a vinyl ester lining.\n36 The shell thicknesses of the tanks identified in Table C.5 represent a nominal thickness of a new tank\n37 when placed into operation. The tank capacities identified in this table represent the maximum volumes.\n38 Nominal tank volumes discussed below represent the maximum volume in a tank unit during normal\n39 operations.\n40 C.4.1.1 Codes and Standards for Tank System Construction\n41 Specific standards for the manufacture of tanks and process systems installed in the 200 Area ETF are\n42 briefly discussed in the following sections. In addition to these codes and industrial standards, a seismic\n43 analysis for each tank and process system is required [WAC 173-303-806(4)(a)(xi)]. The seismic\n44 analysis was performed in accordance with UCRL-15910 Design and Evaluation Guidelines for\n45 Department of Energy Facilities Subjected to Natural Phenomena Hazards, Section 4 (UCRL 1987).\n46 The results of the seismic analyses are summarized in the engineering assessment of the 200 Area ETF\n47 tank systems (Mausshardt 1995).\nAddendum C.18\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI Storage and Treatment Tanks. The following tanks store and/or treat dangerous waste at the ETF.\n2 Tank name Tank number\n3 Surge tank 2025E-60A-TK-1\n4 pH adjustment tank 2025E-60C-TK-1\n5 Effluent pH adjustment tank 2025E-60C-TK-2\n6 First RO feed tank 2025E-60F-TK-1\n7 Second RO feed tank 2025E-60F-TK-2\n8 Verification tanks (three) 2025E-60H-TK-IA/IB/IC\n9 Secondary waste receiving tanks (two) 2025E-601-TK-1A/1B\n10 Evaporator (vapor body) 2025E-601-EV-1\n11 Concentrate tanks (two) 2025E-60J-TK-1A/1B\n12 Sump tanks (two) 2025E-20B-TK-1/2\n13 Distillate flash tank 2025E-601-TK-2\n14 Load-in tanks 2025ED-59A-TK-1/109/117\n15 The relative location of these tanks is presented in Figure C.3. These tanks are maintained at or near\n16 atmospheric pressure. The codes and standards applicable to the design, construction, and testing of the\n17 above tanks and ancillary piping systems are as follows:\n18 ASME -B31.3 Chemical Plant and Petroleum Refinery Piping (ASME 1990)\n19 ASME Sect. VIII, Division I Pressure Vessels (ASME 1992a)\n20 AWS -DI.1 Structural Welding Code -Steel (AWS 1992)\n21 ANSI -B16.5 Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings (ANSI 1992)\n22 ASME Sect. IX Welding and Brazing Qualifications (ASME 1992b)\n23 API 620 Design and Construction of Large Welded Low Pressure Storage\n24 Tanks (API 1990)\n25 AWWA -DIO Welded Steel Tanks for Water Storage (AWWA 1989)\n26 AWWA -D103 Factory-Coated Bolted Steel Tanks for Water Storage\n27 (AWWA 1987)\n28 AWWA -D120 Thermosetting Fiberglass-Reinforced Plastic Tanks\n29 (AWWA 1984)\n30 ASTM-D3299 Filament Wound Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Thermoset Resin\n31 Corrosion Resistant Tanks.\n32 The application of these standards to the construction of 200 Area ETF tanks and independent verification\n33 of completed systems ensured that the tank and tank supports had sufficient structural strength and that\n34 seams and connections were adequate to ensure tank integrity. In addition, each tank met strict quality\n35 assurance requirements. Each tank constructed offsite was tested for integrity and leak tightness before\n36 shipment to the Hanford Facility. Following installation, the systems were inspected for damage to\n37 ensure against leakage and to verify proper operation. If a tank was damaged during shipment or\n38 installation, leak tightness testing was repeated onsite.\n39 C.4.1.2 Design Information for Tanks Located Outside of Effluent Treatment Facility\n40 The load-in tanks, surge tank, and verification tanks are located outside the ETF. These tanks are located\n41 within concrete structures that provide secondary containment.\nAddendum C.19\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 Load-In Tanks and Ancillary Equipment. The load-in tanks 59A-TK-109 and -1 l7are heated and\n2 constructed of stainless steel, and have a nominal capacity of 31,000 liters. Load-in tank 59A-TK-1 is\n3 heated and constructed of fiberglass reinforced plastic and has a nominal capacity of 24,500 liters.\n4 Load-in tanks 59A-TK-109 and -117 are located outside of the metal building while Load-in tank\n5 59A-TK-1 is located inside the building. Ancillary equipment includes transfer pumps, filtration\n6 systems, a double encased, fiberglass transfer pipeline, level instruments for tanker trucks, and leak\n7 detection equipment. From the Load-In Station, aqueous waste can be routed to the surge tank or to the\n8 LERF through a double-encased line. The load-in tanks, sump, pumps, and truck pad are all provided\n9 with secondary containment.\n10 Surge Tank and Ancillary Equipment. The surge tank is constructed of stainless steel and has a\n11 nominal capacity of 421,000 liters. Ancillary equipment to the surge tank includes two underground\n12 double encased (i.e., pipe-within-a-pipe) transfer lines connecting to LERF and three pumps for\n13 transferring aqueous waste to the primary treatment train. The surge tank is located at the south end of\n14 the ETF. The surge tank is insulated and the contents heated to prevent freezing. Eductors in the tank\n15 provide mixing.\n16 Verification Tanks and Ancillary Equipment. The verification tanks are located north of the ETF.\n17 The verification tanks have a nominal capacity of 2,760,000 liters each. For support, the tanks have a\n18 center post with a webbing of beams that extend from the center post to the sides of the tank. The roof is\n19 constructed of epoxy covered carbon steel that is attached to the cross beams of the webbing. The tank\n20 floor also is constructed of epoxy covered carbon steel and is sloped. Eductors are installed in each tank\n21 to provide mixing.\n22 Ancillary equipment includes a return pump that provides circulation of treated effluent through the\n23 eductors. The return pump also recycles effluent back to the 200 Area ETF for retreatment and can\n24 provide service water for 200 Area ETF functions. Two transfer pumps are used to discharge treated\n25 effluent to SALDS or back to the LERF.\n26 C.4.1.3 Design Information for Tanks Located Inside the Effluent Treatment Facility\n27 Building\n28 Most of the 200 Area ETF tanks and ancillary equipment that store or treat dangerous and/or mixed waste\n29 are located within the ETF. The structure serves as secondary containment for the tank systems.\n30 pH Adjustment Tank and Ancillary Equipment. The pH adjustment tank has a nominal capacity of\n31 16,000 liters. Ancillary equipment for this tank includes overflow lines to a sump tank and pumps to\n32 transfer waste to other units in the main treatment train.\n33 Effluent pH Adjustment Tank and Ancillary Equipment. The effluent pH adjustment tank has a\n34 nominal capacity of 13,700 liters. Ancillary equipment includes overflow lines to a sump tank and pumps\n35 to transfer waste to the verification tanks.\n36 First and Second Reverse Osmosis Feed Tanks and Ancillary Equipment. The first RO feed tank is a\n37 vertical, stainless steel tank with a round bottom and has a nominal capacity of 19,700 liters. Conversely,\n38 the second RO feed tank is a rectangular vessel with the bottom of the tank sloping sharply to a single\n39 outlet in the bottom center. The second RO feed tank has a nominal capacity of 7,800 liters. Each RO\n40 tank has a pump to transfer waste to the RO arrays. Overflow lines are routed to a sump tank.\n41 Secondary Waste Receiving Tanks and Ancillary Equipment. Two nominal 69,000-liter secondary\n42 waste receiving tanks collect waste from the units in the main treatment train, such as concentrate solution\n43 (retentate) from the RO units and regeneration solution from the IX columns.\n44 These are vertical, cylindrical tanks with a semi-elliptical bottom and a flat top. Ancillary equipment\n45 includes overflow lines to a sump tank and pumps to transfer aqueous waste to the 200 Area ETF\n46 evaporator.\nAddendum C.20\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 Effluent Treatment Facility Evaporator and Ancillary Equipment. The 200 Area ETF evaporator,\n2 the principal component of the evaporation process, is a cylindrical pressure vessel with a conical bottom.\n3 Aqueous waste is fed into the lower portion of the vessel. The top of the vessel is domed and the vapor\n4 outlet is configured to prevent carryover of liquid during the foaming or bumping (violent boiling) at the\n5 liquid surface. The 200 Area ETF evaporator has a nominal operating capacity of approximately\n6 18,500 liters.\n7 The 200 Area ETF evaporator includes the following ancillary equipment:\n8 * Preheater\n9 * Recirculation pump\n10 * Waste heater with steam level control tank\n11 * Concentrate transfer pump\n12 * Entrainment separator\n13 * Vapor compressor with silencers\n14 * Silencer drain pump\n15 Distillate Flash Tank and Ancillary Equipment. The distillate flash tank is a horizontal tank that has a\n16 nominal operating capacity of 780 liters. Ancillary equipment includes a pump to transfer the distillate to\n17 the surge tank for reprocessing.\n18 Concentrate Tanks and Ancillary Equipment. Each of the two concentrate tanks has an approximate\n19 nominal capacity of 22,700 liters. Ancillary equipment includes overflow lines to a sump tank and pumps\n20 for recirculation and transfer.\n21 Sump Tanks. Sump tanks I and 2 are located below floor level. Both sump tanks are double-walled,\n22 rectangular tanks, placed inside concrete vaults. Both tanks have a working volume of 4,000 liters each.\n23 The sump tanks are located in pits below grade to allow gravity drain of solutions to the tanks. Each\n24 sump tank has two vertical pumps for transfer of waste to the secondary waste receiving tanks or to the\n25 surge tank for reprocessing.\n26 C.4.1.4 Design Information for Effluent Treatment Facility Process Units\n27 As with the 200 Area ETF tanks, process units that treat and/or store dangerous and/or mixed waste are\n28 maintained at or near atmospheric pressure. These units were constructed to meet a series of design\n29 standards, as discussed in the following sections. Table C.6 presents the materials of construction and the\n30 ancillary equipment associated with these process units. All piping systems are designed to withstand the\n31 effects of internal pressure, weight, thermal expansion and contraction, and any pulsating flow. The\n32 design and integrity of these units are presented in the engineering assessment (Mausshardt 1995).\n33 Filters. The load-in fine and rough filter vessels (including the influent and auxiliary filters) are designed\n34 to comply with the ASME Section VIII, Division I, Pressure Vessels (ASME 1992a). The application of\n35 these standards to the construction of the 200 Area ETF filter system and independent inspection ensure\n36 that the filter and filter supports have sufficient structural strength and that the seams and connections are\n37 adequate to ensure the integrity of the filter vessels.\n38 Ultraviolet Oxidation System. The UV/OX reaction chamber is designed to comply with manufacturers\n39 standards.\n40 Degasification System. The codes and standards applicable to the design, fabrication, and testing of the\n41 degasification column are identified as follows:\n42 * ASME -B31.3, Chemical Plant and Petroleum Refinery Piping (ASME 1990)\n43 * AWS -D1.1, Structural Welding Code -Steel (AWS 1992)\n44 * ANSI -B16.5, Pipe Flanges and Flanged Fittings (ANSI 1992)\nAddendum C.21\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 Reverse Osmosis System. The pressure vessels in the RO unit are designed to comply with ASME\n2 Section VIII, Division I, Pressure Vessels (ASME 1992a), and applicable codes and standards.\n3 Ion Exchange (Polishers). The IX columns are designed in accordance with ASME Section VIII,\n4 Division I, Pressure Vessels (ASME 1992a), and applicable codes and standards. Polisher piping is\n5 fabricated of type 304 stainless steel or polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and meets the requirements of\n6 ASME B31.3, Chemical Plant and Petroleum Refinery Piping (ASME 1990).\n7 Effluent Treatment Facility Evaporator. The 200 Area ETF evaporator is designed to meet the\n8 requirements of ASME Section VIII, Division 1, Pressure Vessels (ASME 1992a), and applicable codes\n9 and standards. The 200 Area ETF evaporator piping meets the requirements of ASME B31.3, Chemical\n10 Plant and Petroleum Refinery Piping (ASME 1990).\n11 Thin Film Dryer System. The thin film dryer is designed to meet the requirements of ASME\n12 Section VIII, Division I, Pressure Vessels (ASME 1992a), and applicable codes and standards. The\n13 piping meets the requirements of ASME -B31.3, Chemical Plant and Petroleum Refinery Piping\n14 (ASME 1990).\n15 C.4.1.5 Integrity Assessments\n16 The integrity assessment for 200 Area ETF (Mausshardt 1995) attests to the adequacy of design and\n17 integrity of the tanks and ancillary equipment to ensure that the tanks and ancillary equipment will not\n18 collapse, rupture, or fail over the intended life considering intended uses. For the load-in tanks, a similar\n19 integrity assessment was performed (KEH 1995 and HNF 2009a). Specifically, the assessment\n20 documents the following considerations:\n21 * Adequacy of the standards used during design and construction of the facility.\n22 * Characteristics of the solution in each tank.\n23 * Adequacy of the materials of construction to provide corrosion protection from the solution in\n24 each tank.\n25 * Results of the leak tests and visual inspections.\n26 The results of these assessments demonstrate that tanks and ancillary equipment have sufficient structural\n27 integrity and are acceptable for storing and treating dangerous and/or mixed waste. The assessments also\n28 state that the tanks and building were designed and constructed to withstand a design-basis earthquake.\n29 Independent, qualified registered professional engineers certified these tank assessments.\n30 The scope of the 200 Area ETF tank integrity assessment was based on characterization data from process\n31 condensate. To assess the effect that other aqueous waste might have on the integrity of the 200 Area\n32 ETF tanks, the chemistry of an aqueous waste will be evaluated for its potential to corrode a tank\n33 (e.g., chloride concentrations will be evaluated). The tank integrity assessment for the load-in tanks was\n34 based on characterization data from several aqueous waste streams. The chemistry of an aqueous waste\n35 stream not considered in the load-in tank integrity assessment also will be evaluated for the potential to\n36 corrode a load-in tank.\n37 Consistent with the recommendations of the integrity assessment, a corrosion inspection program was\n38 developed. Periodic integrity assessments are scheduled for those tanks predicted to have the highest\n39 potential for corrosion. These inspections are scheduled annually or longer, based on age of the tank\n40 system, materials of construction, characteristics of the waste, operating experience, and\n41 recommendations of the initial integrity assessment. These 'indicator tanks' include the concentrate\n42 tanks, secondary waste receiving tanks, and verification tanks. One of each of these tanks will be\n43 inspected yearly to determine if corrosion or coating failure has occurred. Should significant corrosion or\n44 coating failure be found, an additional tank of the same type would be inspected during the same year.\n45\nAddendum C.22\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI In the case of the verification tanks, if corrosion or coating failure is found in the second tank, the third\n2 tank also will be inspected. If significant corrosion were observed in all three sets of tanks,'the balance of\n3 the 200 Area ETF tanks would be considered for inspection. For tanks predicted to have lower potential\n4 for corrosion, inspections also are performed nonroutinely as part of the corrective maintenance program.\n5 C.4.2 Additional Requirements for New Tanks\n6 Procedures for proper installation of tanks, tank supports, piping, concrete, etc., are included in\n7 Construction Specification, Project C-018H, 242-A Evaporator/PUREX Plant Process Condensate\n8 Treatment Facility (WHC 1992a). For the load-in tanks, procedures are included in the construction\n9 specifications in Project W-291, 200 Area Effluent BAT/AKART Implementation ETF Truck Load-in\n10 Facility (KEH 1994) and Purgewater Unloading Facility Project Documentation (HNF 2009b).\n11 Following installation, an independent, qualified, registered professional engineer inspected the tanks and\n12 secondary containment. Deficiencies identified included damage to the surge tank, damage to the\n13 verification tank liners, and 200 Area ETF secondary containment concrete surface cracking. All\n14 deficiencies were repaired to the satisfaction of the engineer. The tanks and ancillary equipment were\n15 leak tested as part of acceptance of the system from the construction contractor. Information on the\n16 inspections and leak tests are included in the engineering assessment (Mausshardt 1995). No deficiencies\n17 were identified during installation of the load-in tanks and ancillary equipment.\n18 C.4.3 Secondary Containment and Release Detection for Tank Systems\n19 This section describes the design and operation of secondary containment and leak detection systems at\n20 the ETF.\n21 C.4.3.1 Secondary Containment Requirements for All Tank Systems\n22 The specifications for the preparation, design, and construction of the secondary containment systems at\n23 the 200 Area ETF are documented (WHC 1992a). The preparation, design, and construction of the\n24 secondary containment for the load-in tanks are provided in the construction specifications (KEH 1994\n25 and HNF 2009b). All systems were designed to national codes and standards. Constructing the 200 Area\n26 ETF per these specifications ensured that foundations are capable of supporting tank and secondary\n27 containment systems and that uneven settling and failures from pressure gradients should not occur.\n28 C.4.3.1.1 Common Elements\n29 The following text describes elements of secondary containment that are common to all 200 Area ETF\n30 tank systems. Details on the secondary containment for specific tanks, including leak detection systems\n31 and liquids removal, are provided in Section C.4.3.1,2.\n32 Foundation and Construction. For the tanks within the ETF, except for the sump tanks, secondary\n33 containment is provided by a coated concrete floor and a 15.2-centimeter rise (berm) along the containing\n34 walls. The double-wall construction of the sump tanks provides secondary containment. Additionally,\n35 trenches are provided in the floor that also provides containment and drainage of any liquid to a sump pit.\n36 For tanks outside the ETF, secondary containment also is provided with coated concrete floors in a\n37 containment pit (load-in tanks) or surrounded by concrete dikes (the surge and verification tanks).\n38 The transfer piping that carries aqueous waste into the 200 Area ETF is pipe-within-a-pipe construction,\n39 and is buried approximately 1.2 meters below ground surface. The pipes between the verification tanks\n40 and the verification tank pumps within the 200 Area ETF are located in a concrete pipe trench.\n41 For this discussion, there are five discrete secondary containment systems associated with the following\n42 tanks and ancillary equipment that treat or store dangerous waste:\n43 * Load-in tanks\n44 * Surge tank\n45 * Process area (including sump tanks)\n46 * Verification tanks\nAddendum C.23\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n* Transfer piping and pipe trenches\n2 All of the secondary containment systems are designed with reinforcing steel and base and berm thickness\n3 to minimize failure caused by pressure gradients, physical contact with the waste, and climatic conditions.\n4 Classical theories of structural analysis, soil mechanics, and concrete and structural steel design were used\n5 in the design calculations for the foundations and structures. These calculations are maintained at the\n6 ETF. In each of the analyses, the major design criteria from the following documents were included:\nV-CO18HCI-001 Design Construction Specification, Project C-018H, 242A Evaporator/PUREX\nPlant Process Condensate Treatment Facility (WHC 1992a)\nDOE Order General Design Criteria\n6430.1A\nSDC-4.1 Standard Architectural-Civil Design Criteria, Design Loads for Facilities\n(DOE-RL 1988)\nUCRL-15910 Design and Evaluation Guidelines for Department of Energy Facilities\nSubjected to Natural Phenomena Hazards (UCRL 1987)\nUBC-91 Uniform Building Code, 1991 Edition (ICBO 1991)\nUBC-97 Uniform Building Code, 1997 Edition (ICC 1997, for Load-in tank 59A-TK-1)\n7 The design and structural analysis calculations substantiate the structural designs in the referenced\n8 drawings. The conclusions drawn from these calculations indicate that the designs are sound and that the\n9 specified structural design criteria were met. This conclusion is verified in the independent design review\n10 that was part of the engineering assessment (Mausshardt 1995, KEH 1994, and HNF 2009a).\n11 Containment Materials. The concrete floor consists of cast-in-place and preformed concrete slabs. All\n12 slab joints and floor and wall joints have water stops installed at the mid-depth of the slab. In addition,\n13 filler was applied to each joint.\n14 Except for the sump tank vaults, all of the concrete surfaces in the secondary containment system,\n15 including berms, trenches, and pits, are coated with a chemical-resistant, high-solids, epoxy coating that\n16 consists of a primer and a top coating. This coating material is compatible with the waste being treated,\n17 and with the sulfuric acid, sodium hydroxide, and hydrogen peroxide additives to the process. The\n18 coating protects the concrete from contact with any chemical materials that might be harmful to concrete\n19 and prevents the concrete from being in contact with waste material. Table C.8 summarizes the specific\n20 types of primer and top coats specified for the concrete and masonry surfaces in the ETF. The epoxy\n21 coating is considered integral to the secondary containment system for the tanks and ancillary equipment.\n22 The concrete containment systems are maintained such that any cracks, gaps, holes, and other\n23 imperfections are repaired in a timely manner. Thus, the concrete containment systems do not allow\n24 spilled liquid to reach soil or groundwater. There are a number of personnel doorways and vehicle access\n25 points into the 200 Area ETF process areas. Releases of any spilled or leaked material to the environment\n26 from these access points are prevented by 15.2-centimeter concrete curbs, sloped areas of the floor\n27 (e.g., truck ramp), or trenches.\n28 Containment Capacity and Maintenance. Each of these containment areas is designed to contain more\n29 than 100 percent of the volume of the largest tank in each respective system. Secondary containment\n30 systems for the surge tank, and the verification tanks, which are outside the ETF, also are large enough to\n31 include the additional volume from a 25-year, 24-hour storm event; i.e., 5.3 centimeters of precipitation.\n32 Sprinkler System. The sprinkler system within the 200 Area ETF supplies firewater protection to the\n33 process area and the container storage area. This system is connected to a site wide water supply system\n34 and has the capacity to supply sufficient water to suppress a fire at the ETF. However, in the event of\n35 failure, the sprinkler system can be hooked up to another water source (e.g., tanker truck).\nAddendum C.24\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 C.4.3.1.2 Specific Containment Systems\n2 The following discussion presents a description of the individual containment systems associated with\n3 specific tank systems.\n4 Load-In Tank Secondary Containment. The load-in tanks 59A-TK-109 and -117 are mounted on a\n5 46-centimeter-thick reinforced concrete slab (Drawing H-2-817970). Secondary containment is provided\n6 by a pit with 30.5-centimeter-thick walls and a floor constructed of reinforced concrete. The load-in tank\n7 pit is sloped to drain solution to a sump. The depth of the pit varies with the slope of the floor, with an\n8 average thickness of about 1.1 meters. The volume of the secondary containment is about 73,000 liters,\n9 which is capable of containing the volume of at least one load-in tank (i.e., 34,200 liters). Leaks are\n10 detected by a leak detector that alarms locally, in the 200 Area ETF control room, and by visual\n11 inspection of the secondary containment. Alarms are monitored continuously in the ETF control room\n12 during Load-in Station transfers and at least daily when there are no Load-in Station transfers occurring.\n13 Adjacent to the pit is a 25.4-centimeter-thick reinforced concrete pad that serves as secondary\n14 containment for the load-in tanker trucks, containers, transfer pumps, and filter system that serve as the\n15 first tanker truck unloading bay. The pad is inside the metal Load-in building and is 15.2 centimeters\n16 below grade with north and south walls gently sloped to allow truck access. The pad has a 3-inch drain\n17 pipe to route waste solution to the adjacent load-in tank pit. The pad does not have protective coating\n18 because it would experience excessive wear from the vehicle traffic.\n19 Load-in tank 59A-TK-1 is located on a 25.4-centimeter-thick reinforced concrete slab\n20 (Drawing H-2-817970) inside the metal Load-in building. The tank has a flat bottom which sits on a\n21 concrete slab in the secondary containment. Secondary containment for the tank, filter system, and truck\n22 unloading piping is provided by an epoxy coated catch basin with a capacity of about 3,400 liters. The\n23 catch basin is sloped to route solution from the catch basin through a 15.2-centimeter-wide by 14.3-\n24 centimeter-deep trench to the adjacent truck unloading pad. This pad drains to the Load-in tank pit\n25 discussed above. The volume of the combined secondary containment of these two systems is greater\n26 than 76,400 liters, which is capable of holding the volume of tank 59A-TK-1 (i.e., 26,000 liters).\n27 Adjacent to tank 59A-TK-1 catch basin is a 25.4-centimeter-thick reinforced concrete pad that serves as\n28 the second tanker truck unloading bay. The pad is inside the metal Load-in building and has a 2.4-meter\n29 by 4.0-meter shallow, sloping pit to catch leaks during tanker truck unloading. The pit has a maximum\n30 depth of 6.0 centimeters and a 15.2-centimeter-wide by 6.0-centimeter-deep trench to route leaks to the\n31 adjacent tank 59A-TK-1 catch basin. The pad does not have protective coating because it would\n32 experience excessive wear from the vehicle traffic.\n33 Surge Tank Secondary Containment. The surge tank is mounted on a reinforced concrete ringwall.\n34 Inside the ringwall, the flat-bottomed tank is supported by a bed of compacted sand and gravel with a\n35 high-density polyethylene liner bonded to the ringwall. The liner prevents galvanic corrosion between the\n36 soil and the tank. The secondary containment is reinforced concrete with a 15.2-centimeter thick floor\n37 and a 20.3-centimeter thick dike. The secondary containment area shares part of the southern wall of the\n38 main process area. The dike extends up 2.9 meters to provide a containment volume of 856,000 liters for\n39 the 462,000-liter surge tank.\n40 The floor of the secondary containment slopes to a sump in the northwest corner of the containment area.\n41 Leaks into the secondary containment are detected by level instrumentation in the sump which alarms in\n42 the ETF control room and/or by routine visual inspections. Sump alarms are monitored continuously in\n43 the ETF control room during ETF processing operations and at least daily when ETF is not processing\n44 waste. A sump pump is used to transfer solution in the secondary containment to a sump tank.\n45 Process Area Secondary Containment. The process area contains the tanks and ancillary equipment of\n46 the primary and secondary treatment trains, and has ajointed, reinforced concrete slab floor. The\n47 concrete floor of the process area provides the secondary containment. This floor is a minimum of\n48 15.2 centimeters thick.\nAddendum C.25\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI With doorsills 15.2 centimeter high, the process area has a containment volume of approximately 93,800\n2 liters. The largest tanks in the process area are the secondary waste receiving tanks, which each have a\n3 maximum capacity of 73,800 liters.\n4 The floor of the process area is sloped to drain liquids to two trenches that drain to a sump. Each trench is\n5 approximately 38.1 centimeters wide with a sloped trough varying from 39.4 to 76.2 centimeters deep.\n6 Leaks into the secondary containment are detected by routine visual inspections of the floor area near the\n7 tanks, ancillary equipment, and in the trenches.\n8 A small dam was placed in the trench that comes from the thin film dryer room to contain minor liquid\n9 spills originating in the dryer room to minimize the spread of contamination into the process area. The\n10 dryer room is inspected for leaks in accordance with the inspection schedule in Addendum I. Operators\n11 clean up these minor spills by removing the liquid waste and decontaminating the spill area.\n12 A small dam was also placed in the trench adjacent to the chemical feed skid when the chemical berm\n13 area was expanded to accommodate acid and caustic pumps, which were moved indoors from the top of\n14 the surge tank to resolve a safety concern. This dam was designed to contain minor spills originating in\n15 the chemical berm area and prevent them from entering the process sump.\n16 The northwest corner of the process area consists of a pump pit containing the pumps and piping for\n17 transferring treated effluent from the verification tanks to SALDS. The pit is built 1.37 meters below the\n18 process area floor level and is sloped to drain to a trench built along its north wall that routes liquid to\n19 sump tank 1. Leaks into the secondary containment of the pump pit are detected by routine visual\n20 inspections.\n21 Sump Tanks. The sump tanks support the secondary containment system, and collect waste from several\n22 sources, including:\n23 * Process area drain trenches.\n24 * Tank overflows and drains.\n25 * Container washing water.\n26 * Resin dewatering solution.\n27 * Steam boiler blow down.\n28 * Sampler system drains.\n29 These double-contained tanks are located within unlined, concrete vaults. The sump tank levels are\n30 monitored by remote level indicators or through visual inspections from the sump covers. These\n31 indicators are connected to high- and low-level alarms that are monitored in the ETF control room during\n32 ETF processing operations and at least daily when ETF is not processing liquid waste. When a high-\n33 level alarm is activated, a pump is activated and the sump tank contents usually are routed to the\n34 secondary treatment train for processing. The contents also could be routed to the surge tank for\n35 treatment in the primary treatment train. In the event of an abnormally high inflow rate, a second sump\n36 pump is initiated automatically.\n37 Verification Tank Secondary Containment. The three verification tanks are each mounted on\n38 ringwalls with high-density polyethylene liners similar to the surge tank. The secondary containment for\n39 the three tanks is reinforced concrete with a 15.2-centimeter thick floor and a 20.3-centimeter thick dike.\n40 The dike extends up 2.6 meters to provide a containment of approximately 3,390,000 liters exceeding the\n41 capacity of a single verification tank (See Table C.5).\n42 The floor of the secondary containment slopes to a sump along the southern wall of the dike. Leaks into\n43 the secondary containment are detected by level instrumentation in the sump and/or by routine visual\n44 inspections. Sump alarms are monitored continuously in the ETF control room during ETF processing\n45 operations and at least daily when ETF is not processing waste. A sump pump is used to transfer solution\n46 in the secondary containment to a sump tank.\nAddendum C.26\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI C.4.3.2 Additional Requirements for Specific Types of Systems\n2 This section addresses additional requirements in WAC 173-303-640 for double-walled tanks like the\n3 sump tanks and secondary containment for ancillary equipment and piping associated with the tank\n4 systems.\n5 C.4.3.2.1 Double-Walled Tanks\n6 The sump tanks are the only tanks in the 200 Area ETF classified as 'double-walled' tanks. These tanks\n7 are located in unlined concrete vaults and support the secondary containment system for the process area.\n8 The sump tanks are equipped with a leak detector between the walls of the tanks that provide continuous\n9 monitoring for leaks. The leak detector alarms are monitored in the ETF control room. These sump tank\n10 alarms are monitored continuously during ETF processing operations and at least daily when ETF is not\n11 processing waste. The inner tanks are contained completely within the outer shells. The tanks are\n12 contained completely within the concrete structure of the 200 Area ETF so corrosion protection from\n13 external galvanic corrosion is not necessary.\n14 C.4.3.2.2 Ancillary Equipment\n15 The secondary containment provided for the tanks and process systems also serves as secondary\n16 containment for the ancillary equipment associated with these systems.\n17 Ancillary Equipment. Section C.4.3.1.2 describes the secondary containment systems that also serve\n18 most of the ancillary equipment within the 200 Area ETF. Between the 200 Area ETF and the\n19 verification tanks, a pipeline trench provides secondary containment for four pipelines connecting the\n20 transfer pumps (i.e., discharge and return pumps) in the 200 Area ETF with the verification tanks\n21 (Figure C.2). This concrete trench crosses under the road and extends from the verification tank pumps to\n22 the verification tanks. Treated effluent flows through these pipelines from the verification tank pumps to\n23 the verification tanks. The return pump is used to return effluent to the 200 Area ETF for use as service\n24 water or for reprocessing.\n25 For all of the ancillary equipment housed within the ETF, the concrete floor, trenches, and berms form the\n26 secondary containment system. For the ancillary equipment of the surge tank and the verification tanks,\n27 secondary containment is provided by the concrete floors and dikes associated with these tanks. The\n28 concrete floor and pit provide secondary containment for the ancillary equipment of the load-in tanks.\n29 Transfer Piping and Pipe Trenches. The two buried transfer lines between LERF and the surge tank\n30 have secondary containment in a pipe-within-a-pipe arrangement. The 4-inch transfer line has an 8-inch\n31 outer pipe, while the 3-inch transfer, line has a 6-inch outer pipe. The pipes are fiberglass and are sloped\n32 towards the surge tank. The outer piping ends with a drain valve in the surge tank secondary\n33 containment.\n34 These pipelines are equipped with leak detection located in the annulus between the inner and outer pipes;\n35 the leak detection equipment can continuously 'inspect' the pipelines during aqueous waste transfers. The\n36 alarms on the leak detection system are monitored in the ETF control room. The control room alarms are\n37 monitored continuously during aqueous waste transfers between LERF and the ETF surge tank and at\n38 least daily when no transfers are occurring. A low-volume air purge of the annulus is provided to prevent\n39 condensation buildup and minimize false alarms by the leak detection system. In the event that these leak\n40 detectors are not in service, the pipelines are inspected during transfers by opening a drain valve to check\n41 for solution in the annular space between the inner and outer pipe.\n42 The 3-inch transfer line between the load-in tanks and the surge tank has a 6-inch outer pipe in a pipe-\n43 within-a-pipe arrangement. The piping is made of fiberglass-reinforced plastic and slopes towards the\n44 load-in tank secondary containment pit. The drain valve and leak detection system for the load-in tank\n45 pipelines are operated similarly to the leak detection system for the LERF to 200 Area ETF pipelines.\n46 As previously indicated, a reinforced concrete pipe trench provides secondary containment for piping\n47 under the roadway between the 200 Area ETF and the verification tanks.\nAddendum C.27\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI Three 15.2 centimeter thick reinforced concrete partitions divide the trench into four portions and support\n2 metal gratings over the trench. Each portion of the trench is 1.2 meters wide, 0.76 meter deep, and slopes\n3 to route any solution present to 4-inch drain lines through the north wall of the ETF building. These drain\n4 lines route solution to sump tank 2 in ETF. The floor of the pipe trench is 30.5 centimeters thick and the\n5 sides are 15.2 centimeters thick. The concrete trenches are coated with water sealant and covered with\n6 metal gratings at ground level to allow vehicle traffic on the roadway.\n7 C.4.4 Tank Management Practices\n8 When an aqueous waste stream is identified for treatment or storage at 200 Area ETF, the generating unit\n9 is required to characterize the waste. Based on characterization data, the waste stream is evaluated to\n10 determine if the stream is acceptable for treatment or storage. Specific tank management practices are\n11 discussed in the following sections.\n12 C.4.4.1.1 Rupture, Leakage, Corrosion Prevention\n13 Most aqueous waste streams can be managed such that corrosion would not be a concern. For example,\n14 an aqueous waste stream with high concentrations of chloride might cause corrosion problems when\n15 concentrated in the secondary treatment train. One approach is to adjust the corrosion control measures in\n16 the secondary treatment train. An alternative might be to blend this aqueous waste in a LERF basin with\n17 another aqueous waste that has sufficient dissolved solids, such that the concentration of the chlorides in\n18 the secondary treatment train would not pose a corrosion concern.\n19 Additionally, the materials of construction used in the tanks systems (Table C.5) make it unlikely that an\n20 aqueous waste would corrode a tank. For more information on corrosion prevention, refer to\n21 Addendum B, Waste Analysis Plan.\n22 If operating experience suggests that most aqueous waste streams can be managed such that corrosion\n23 would not be a concern, operating practices and integrity assessment schedules and requirements will be\n24 reviewed and modified as appropriate.\n25 When a leak in a tank system is discovered, the leak is immediately contained or stopped by isolating the\n26 leaking component. Following containment, the requirements of WAC 173-303-640(7), incorporated by\n27 reference, are followed. These requirements include repair or closure of the tank/tank system component,\n28 and certification of any major repairs.\n29 C.4.4.2 Overfilling Prevention\n30 Operating practices and administrative controls used at the 200 Area ETF to prevent overfilling a tank are\n31 discussed in the following paragraphs. The 200 Area ETF process is controlled by the MCS. The MCS\n32 monitors liquid levels in the 200 Area ETF tanks and has alarms that annunciate on high-liquid level to\n33 notify operators that actions must be taken to prevent overfilling of these vessels. As an additional\n34 precaution to prevent spills, many tanks are equipped with overflow lines that route solutions to sump\n35 tanks I and 2. These tanks include the pH adjustment tank; RO feed tanks, effluent pH adjustment tank,\n36 secondary waste receiving tanks, and concentrate tanks.\n37 The following section discusses feed systems, safety cutoff devices, bypass systems, and pressure\n38 controls for specific tanks and process systems.\n39 Tanks. All tanks are equipped with liquid level sensors that give a reading of the tank liquid volume. All\n40 of the tanks are equipped further with liquid level alarms that are actuated if the liquid volume is near the\n41 tank overflow capacity. In the actuation of the surge tank alarm, a liquid level switch trips, sending a\n42 signal to the valve actuator on the tank influent lines, and causing the influent valves to close.\n43 The operating mode for each verification tank, i.e., receiving, holding, or discharging, can be designated\n44 through the MCS; modes also switch automatically. When the high-level set point on the receiving\n45 verification tank is reached, the flow to this tank is diverted and another tank becomes the receiver. The\n46 full tank is switched into verification mode. The third tank is reserved for discharge mode.\nAddendum C.28\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 The liquid levels in the pH adjustment, first and second RO feed, and effluent pH adjustment tanks are\n2 maintained within predetermined operating ranges. Should any of these tanks overflow, the excess waste\n3 is piped along with any leakage from the feed pumps to a sump tank.\n4 When waste in a secondary waste-receiving tank reaches the high-level set point, the influent flow of\n5 waste is redirected to the second tank. In a similar fashion, the concentrate tanks switch receipt modes\n6 when the high-level set point of one tank is reached.\n7 Filter Systems. All filters at 200 Area ETF (i.e., the Load-In Station, rough, fine, and auxiliary filter\n8 systems) are in leak-tight steel casings. For the rough and fine filters, a high differential pressure, which\n9 could damage the filter element, activates a valve that shuts off liquid flow to protect the filter element\n10 from possible damage. To prevent a high-pressure situation, the filters are cleaned routinely with pulses\n11 of compressed air that force water back through the filter. Cleaning is terminated automatically by\n12 shutting off the compressed air supply if high pressure develops. The differential pressure across the\n13 auxiliary filters also is monitored. A high differential pressure in these filters would result in a system\n14 shutdown to allow the filters to be changed out.\n15 The Load-In Station filtration system has pressure gauges for monitoring the differential pressure across\n16 each filter. A high differential pressure would result in discontinuing filter operation until the filter is\n17 replaced.\n18 Ultraviolet Light/Oxidation System and Decomposers. A rupture disk on the inlet piping to each of\n19 the UV/OX reaction vessels relieves to the pH adjustment tank in the event of excessive pressure\n20 developing in the piping system. Should the rupture disk fail, the aqueous waste would trip the moisture\n21 sensor, shut down the UV lamps, and close the surge tank feed valve. Also provided is a level sensor to\n22 protect UV lamps against the risk of exposure to air. Should those sensors be actuated, the UV lamps\n23 would be shut down immediately.\n24 The piping and valving for the hydrogen peroxide decomposers are configured to split the waste flow:\n25 half flows to one decomposer and half flows to the other decomposer. Alternatively, the total flow of\n26 waste can be treated in one decomposer or both decomposers can be bypassed. A safety relief valve on\n27 each decomposer vessel can relieve excess system pressure to a sump tank.\n28 Degasification System. The degasification column is typically supplied aqueous waste feed by the pH\n29 adjustment tank feed pump. This pump transfers waste solution through the hydrogen peroxide\n30 decomposer, the fine filter, and the degasification column to the first RO feed tank.\n31 The degasification column is designed for operation at a partial vacuum. A pressure sensor in the outlet\n32 of the column detects the column pressure. The vacuum in the degasification column is maintained by a\n33 blower connected to the vessel off gas system. The column is protected from extremely low pressure\n34 developed by the column blower by the use of an intake vent that is maintained in the open position\n35 during operation. The column liquid level is regulated by a flow control system with a high- and low-\n36 level alarm. Plate-type heat exchanger cools the waste solution fed to the degasification column.\n37 Reverse Osmosis System. The flow through the first and second RO stages is controlled to maintain\n38 constant liquid levels in the first and second stage RO feed tanks.\n39 Polisher. Typically, two of the three columns are in operation (lead/lag) and the third (regenerated)\n40 column is in standby. When the capacity of the resin in the first column is exceeded, as detected by an\n41 increase in the conductivity of the column effluent, the third column, containing freshly regenerated IX\n42 resin, is brought online. The first column is taken offline, and the waste is rerouted to the second column,\n43 and to the third. Liquid level instrumentation and automatically operated valves are provided in the IX\n44 system to prevent overfilling.\n45 Effluent Treatment Facility Evaporator. Liquid level instrumentation in the secondary waste receiving\n46 tanks is designed to preclude a tank overflow. A liquid level switch actuated by a high-tank liquid level\n47 causes the valves to reposition, closing off flow to the secondary waste receiving tanks. Secondary\n48 containment for these tanks routes liquids to a sump tank.\nAddendum C.29\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 Valves in the 200 Area ETF evaporator feed line can be positioned to bypass the secondary waste around\n2 the 200 Area ETF evaporator and to transfer the secondary waste to the concentrate tanks.\n3 Thin Film Dryer. The two concentrate tanks alternately feed the thin film dryer. Typically, one tank\n4 serves as a concentrate waste receiver while the other tank serves as the dryer feed tank. One tank may\n5 serve as both concentrate waste receiver and dryer feed tank. Liquid level instrumentation prevents tank\n6 overflow by diverting the concentrate flow from the full concentrate tank to the other concentrate tank.\n7 Secondary containment for these tanks routes liquids to a sump tank.\n8 An alternate route is provided from the concentrate receiver tank to the secondary waste receiving tanks.\n9 Dilute concentrate in the concentrate receiver tank can be reprocessed through the 200 Area ETF\n10 evaporator by transferring the concentrate back to a secondary waste-receiving tank.\n11 C.4.5 Labels or Signs\n12 Each tank or process unit in the 200 Area ETF is identified by a nameplate attached in a readily visible\n13 location. Included on the nameplate are the equipment number and the equipment title. Those tanks that\n14 store or treat dangerous waste at the 200 Area ETF (Section C.4. 1.1) are identified with a label, which\n15 reads PROCESS WATER/WASTE. The labels are legible at a distance of at least fifty feet or as\n16 appropriate for legibility within the ETF. Additionally, these tanks bear a legend that identifies the waste\n17 in a manner, which adequately warns employees, emergency personnel, and the public of the major risk(s)\n18 associated with the waste being stored or treated in the tank system(s).\n19 Caution plates are used to show possible hazards and warn that precautions are necessary. Caution signs\n20 have a yellow background and black panel with yellow letters and bear the word CA UTION. Danger\n21 signs show immediate danger and signify that special precautions are necessary. These signs are red,\n22 black, and white and bear the word DANGER.\n23 Tanks and vessels containing corrosive chemicals are posted with black and white signs bearing the word\n24 CORROSIVE. DANGER -UNAUTHORIZED PERSONNEL KEEP OUT signs are posted on all exterior\n25 doors of the ETF, and on each interior door leading into the process area. Tank ancillary piping is also\n26 labeled PROCESS WATER or PROCESS LIQUID to alert personnel which pipes in the process area\n27 contains dangerous and/or mixed waste.\n28 All tank systems holding dangerous waste are marked with labels or signs to identify the waste contained\n29 in the tanks. The labels or signs are legible at a distance of at least 50-feet and bear a legend that\n30 identifies the waste in a manner that adequately warns employees, emergency response personnel, and the\n31 public, of the major risk(s) associated with the waste being stored or treated in the tank system(s).\n32 C.4.6 Air Emissions\n33 Tank systems that contain extremely hazardous waste that is acutely toxic by inhalation must be designed\n34 to prevent the escape of such vapors. To date, no extremely hazardous waste has been managed in\n35 200 Area ETF tanks and is not anticipated. However, the 200 Area ETF tanks have forced ventilation that\n36 draws air from the tank vapor spaces to prevent exposure of operating personnel to any toxic vapors that\n37 might be present. The vapor passes through a charcoal filter and two sets of high-efficiency particulate\n38 air filters before discharge to the environment. The Load-in tanks and verification tanks are vented to the\n39 atmosphere.\n40 C.4.7 Management of Ignitable or Reactive Wastes in Tanks Systems\n41 Although the 200 Area ETF is permitted to accept waste that is designated ignitable or reactive, such\n42 waste would be treated or blended immediately after placement in the tank system so that the resulting\n43 waste mixture is no longer ignitable or reactive. Aqueous waste received does not meet the definition of a\n44 combustible or flammable liquid given in National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) code number\n45 30 (NFPA 1996).\n46\nAddendum C.30\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI The buffer zone requirements in NFPA-30, which require tanks containing combustible or flammable\n2 solutions be a safe distance from each other and from public way, are not applicable.\n3 C.4.8 Management of Incompatible Wastes in Tanks Systems\n4 The 200 Area ETF manages dilute solutions that can be mixed without compatibility issues. The\n5 200 Area ETF is equipped with several systems that can adjust the pH of the waste for treatment\n6 activities. Sulfuric acid and sodium hydroxide are added to the process through the MCS for pH\n7 adjustment to ensure there will be no large pH fluctuations and adverse reactions in the tank systems.\n8 C.5 Surface Impoundments\n9 This section provides specific information on surface impoundment operations at the LERF, including\n10 descriptions of the liners and secondary containment structures, as required by WAC 173-303-650 and\n11 WAC 173-303-806(4)(d).\n12 The LERF consists of three lined surface impoundments (basins) with a design operating capacity of\n13 29.5 million liters each. The maximum capacity of each basin is 34 million liters. The dimensions of\n14 each basin at the anchor wall are approximately 103 meters by 85 meters. The typical top dimensions of\n15 the wetted area are approximately 89 meters by 71 meters, while the bottom dimensions are\n16 approximately 57 by 38 meters. Total depth from the top of the dike to the bottom of the basin is\n17 approximately 7 meters. The typical finished basin bottoms lie at about 4 meters below the initial grade\n18 and 175 meters above sea level. The dikes separating the basins have a typical height of 3 meters and\n19 typical top width of 11.6 meters around the perimeter of the impoundments.\n20 C.5.1 List of Dangerous Waste\n21 A list of dangerous and/or mixed aqueous waste that can be stored in LERF is presented in Addendum A.\n22 Addendum B, Waste Analysis Plan also provides a discussion of the types of waste that are managed in\n23 the LERF.\n24 C.5.2 Construction, Operation, and Maintenance of Liner System\n25 General information concerning the liner system is presented in the following sections. Information\n26 regarding loads on the liner, liner coverage, UV light exposure prevention, and location relative to the\n27 water table are discussed.\n28 C.5.2.1 Liner Construction Materials\n29 The LERF employs a double-composite liner system with a leachate detection, collection, and removal\n30 system between the primary and secondary liners. Each basin is constructed with an upper or primary\n31 liner consisting of a high-density polyethylene geomembrane laid over a bentonite carpet liner. The lower\n32 or secondary liner in each basin is a composite of a geomembrane laid over a layer of soil/bentonite\n33 admixture with a hydraulic conductivity less than 10' centimeters per second. The synthetic liners extend\n34 up the dike wall to a concrete anchor wall that surrounds the basin at the top of the dike. A batten system\n35 bolts the layers in place to the anchor wall (Figure C.16).\n36 Figure C.17 is a schematic cross-section of the liner system. The liner components, listed from the top to\n37 the bottom of the liner system, are the following:\n38 * Primary 1.5-millimeter high-density polyethylene geomembrane\n39 * Bentonite carpet liner\n40 * Geotextile\n41 * Drainage gravel (bottom) and geonet (sides)\n42 * Geotextile\n43 * Secondary 1.5-millimeter high-density polyethylene geomembrane\n44 * Soil/bentonite admixture (91 centimeters on the bottom, 107 centimeters on the sides)\nAddendum C.31\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n* Geotextile\n2 The primary geomembrane, made of 1.5-millimeter high-density polyethylene, forms the basin surface\n3 that holds the aqueous waste. The secondary geomembrane, also 1.5-millimeter high-density\n4 polyethylene, forms a barrier surface for leachate that might penetrate the primary liner. The high-density\n5 polyethylene chemically is resistant to constituents in the aqueous waste and has a relatively high strength\n6 compared to other lining materials. The high-density polyethylene resin specified for the LERF contains\n7 carbon black, antioxidants, and heat stabilizers to enhance its resistance to the degrading effects of UV\n8 light. The approach to ensuring the compatibility of aqueous waste streams with the LERF liner materials\n9 and piping is discussed in Addendum B, Waste Analysis Plan.\n10 Three geotextile layers are used in the LERF liner system. The layers are thin, nonwoven polypropylene\n11 fabric that chemically is resistant, highly permeable, and resistant to microbiological growth. The first\n12 two layers prevent fine soil particles from infiltrating and clogging the drainage layer. The second\n13 geotextile also provides limited protection for the secondary geomembrane from the drainage rock. The\n14 third geotextile layer prevents the mixing of the soil/bentonite admixture with the much more porous and\n15 granular foundation material.\n16 A 30.5-centimeters-thick gravel drainage layer on the bottom of the basins between the primary and\n17 secondary liners provides a flow path for liquid to the leachate detection, collection, and removal system.\n18 A geonet (or drainage net) is located immediately above the secondary geomembrane on the basin\n19 sidewalls. The geonet functions as a preferential flow path for liquid between the liners, carrying liquid\n20 down to the gravel drainage layer and subsequently to the leachate sump. The geonet is a mesh made of\n21 high-density polyethylene, with approximately 13-millimeter openings.\n22 The soil/bentonite layer is 91 centimeters thick on the bottom of the basins and 107 centimeters thick on\n23 the basin sidewalls; its permeability is less than 10-7 centimeters per second. This composite liner design,\n24 consisting of a geomembrane laid over essentially impermeable soil/bentonite, is considered best\n25 available technology for solid waste landfills and surface impoundments. The combination of synthetic\n26 and clay liners is reported in the literature to provide the maximum protection from waste migration\n27 (Forseth and Kmet 1983).\n28 A number of laboratory tests were conducted to measure the engineering properties of the soil/bentonite\n29 admixture, in addition to extensive field tests performed on three test fills constructed near the LERF site.\n30 For establishing an optimum ratio of bentonite to soil for the soil/bentonite admixture, mixtures of various\n31 ratios were tested to determine permeability and shear strength. A mixture of 12 percent bentonite was\n32 selected for the soil/bentonite liner and tests described in the following paragraphs demonstrated that the\n33 admixture meets the desired permeability of less than 10-7 centimeters per second. Detailed discussion of\n34 test procedures and results is provided in Report of Geotechnical Investigation, 242-A Evaporation and\n35 PUREX Interim Storage Basins (Chen-Northem 1990).\n36 Direct shear tests were performed according to ASTM D3080 test procedures (ASTM 1990) on\n37 soil/bentonite samples of various ratios. Based on these results, the conservative minimum Mohr-\n38 Coulomb shear strength value of 30 degrees was estimated for a soil/bentonite admixture containing\n39 12 percent bentonite.\n40 The high degree of compaction of the soil/bentonite layer [92 percent per ASTM Dl 557 (ASTM 1991)]\n41 was expected to maximize the bonding forces between the clay particles, thereby minimizing moisture\n42 transport through the liner. With respect to particle movement ('piping'), estimated fluid velocities in this\n43 low-permeability material are too low to move the soil particles. Therefore, piping is not considered a\n44 problem.\n45 For the soil/bentonite layer, three test fills were constructed to demonstrate that materials, methods, and\n46 procedures used would produce a soil/bentonite liner that meets the EPA permeability requirement of less\n47 than 10' centimeters per second. All test fills met the EPA requirements.\n48\nAddendum C.32\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 A thorough discussion of construction procedures, testing, and results is provided in Report of\n2 Permeability Testing, Soil-bentonite Test Fill (Chen-Northern 1991 a).\n3 The aqueous waste stored in the LERF is typically a dilute mixture of organic and inorganic constituents.\n4 Though isolated instances of soil liner incompatibility have been documented in the literature (Forseth\n5 and Kmet 1983), these instances have occurred with concentrated solutions that were incompatible with\n6 the geomembrane liners in which the solutions were contained. Considering the dilute nature of the\n7 aqueous waste that is and will be stored in LERF and the moderate pH, and test results demonstrating the\n8 compatibility of the high-density polyethylene liners with the aqueous waste [9090 Test Results\n9 (WHC 1991)], gross failure of the soil/bentonite layer is not probable.\n10 Each basin also is equipped with a floating very low-density polyethylene cover. The cover is anchored\n11 and tensioned at the concrete wall at the top of the dikes, using a patented mechanical tensioning system.\n12 Figure C.16 depict the tension mechanism and the anchor wall at the perimeter of each basin. Additional\n13 information on the cover system is provided in Section C.5.2.5.\n14 C.5.2.1.1 Material Specifications\n15 Material specifications for the liner system and leachate collection system, including liners, drainage\n16 gravel, and drainage net are discussed in the following sections. Material specifications are documented\n17 in the Final Specifications 242-A Evaporator and PUREX Interim Retention Basins (KEH 1990a) and\n18 Construction Specifications for 242-A Evaporator and PUREXInterim Retention Basins (KEH 1990b).\n19 Geomembrane Liners. The high-density polyethylene resin for geomembranes for the LERF meets the\n20 material specifications listed in Table C.9. Key physical properties include thickness (1.5 millimeters\n21 [60 mil]) and impermeability (hydrostatic resistance of over 360,000 kilogram per square meter).\n22 Physical properties meet National Sanitation Foundation Standard 54 (NSF 1985). Testing to determine\n23 if the liner material is compatible with typical dilute waste solutions was performed and documented in\n24 9090 Test Results (WHC 1991).\n25 Soil/Bentonite Liner. The soil/bentonite admixture consists of 11.5 to 14.5 percent bentonite mixed into\n26 well-graded silty sand with a maximum particle size of 4.75 millimeters (No. 4 sieve). Test fills were\n27 performed to confirm the soil/bentonite admixture applied at LERF has hydraulic conductivity less than\n28 10' centimeters per second, as required by WAC 173-303-650(2)() for new surface impoundments.\n29 Bentonite Carpet Liner. The bentonite carpet liner consists of bentonite (90 percent sodium\n30 montmorillonite clay) in a primary backing of woven polypropylene with nylon filler fiber, and a cover\n31 fabric of open weave spunlace polyester. The montmorillonite is anticipated to retard migration of\n32 solution through the liner, exhibiting a favorable cation exchange for adsorption of some constituents\n33 (such as ammonium). Based on composition of the bentonite carpet and of the type of aqueous waste\n34 stored at LERF, no chemical attack, dissolution, or degradation of the bentonite carpet liner is anticipated.\n35 Geotextile. The nonwoven geotextile layers consist of long-chain polypropylene polymers containing\n36 stabilizers and inhibitors to make the filaments resistant to deterioration from UV light and heat exposure.\n37 The geotextile layers consist of continuous geotextile sheets held together by needle punching. Edges of\n38 the fabric are sealed or otherwise finished to prevent outer material from pulling away from the fabric or\n39 raveling.\n40 Drainage Gravel. The drainage layer consists of thoroughly washed and screened, naturally occurring\n41 rock meeting the size specifications for Grading Number 5 in Washington State Department of\n42 Transportation construction specifications (WSDOT 1988). The specifications for the drainage layer are\n43 given in Table C.10. Hydraulic conductivity tests (Chen-Northern 1992a, 1992b, 1992c) showed the\n44 drainage rock used at LERF met the sieve requirements and had a hydraulic conductivity of at least\n45 1 centimeter per second, which exceeded the minimum of at least 0.1 centimeters per second required by\n46 WAC 173-303-650(2)(j) for new surface impoundments.\n47\nAddendum C.33\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI Geonet. The geonet is fabricated from two sets of parallel high-density polyethylene strands, spaced\n2 1.3 centimeters center-to-center maximum to form a mesh with minimum two strands per 2.54 centimeter\n3 in each direction. The geonet is located between the liners on the sloping sidewalls to provide a\n4 preferential flow path for leachate to the drainage gravel and subsequently to the leachate sump.\n5 Leachate Collection Sump. Materials used to line the 3.0-meter by 1.8-meter by 0.30-meter-deep\n6 leachate sump, at the bottom of each basin in the northwest corner, include [from top to bottom\n7 (Figure C.18)]:\n8 * 25 millimeter high-density polyethylene flat stock (supporting the leachate riser pipe)\n9 * Geotextile\n10 * 1.5-millimeter high-density polyethylene rub sheet\n11 * Secondary composite liner:\n12 o 1.5-millimeter high-density polyethylene geomembrane\n13 o 91 centimeters of soil/bentonite admixture\n14 o Geotextile\n15 Specifications for these materials are identical to those discussed previously.\n16 Leachate System Risers. Risers for the leachate system consist of 10-inch and 4-inch pipes from the\n17 leachate collection sump to the catch basin northwest of each basin (Figure C. 18). The risers lay below\n18 the primary liner in a gravel-filled trench that also extends from the sump to the concrete catch basin.\n19 The risers are high-density polyethylene pipes fabricated to meet the requirements in ASTM D1248\n20 (ASTM 1989). The 10-inch riser is perforated every 20.3 centimeters with 1.3-centimeter holes around\n21 the diameter. Level sensors and leachate pump are inserted in the 10-inch riser to monitor and remove\n22 leachate from the sump. To prevent clogging of the pump and piping with fine particulate, the end of the\n23 riser is encased in a gravel-filled box constructed of high-density polyethylene geonet and wrapped in\n24 geotextile. The 4-inch riser is perforated every 10.2 centimeters with 0.64-centimeter holes around the\n25 diameter. A level detector is inserted in the 4-inch riser.\n26 Leachate Pump. A deep-well submersible pump, designed to deliver approximately 110 liters per\n27 minute, is installed in the 10-inch leachate riser in each basin. Wetted parts of the leachate pump are\n28 made of 316L stainless steel, providing both corrosion resistance and durability.\n29 C.S.2.1.2 Loads on Liner System\n30 The LERF liner system is subjected to the following types of stresses.\n31 Stresses from Installation or Construction Operations. Contractors were required to submit\n32 construction quality control plans that included procedures, techniques, tools, and equipment used for the\n33 construction and care of liner and leachate system. Methods for installation of all components were\n34 screened to ensure that the stresses on the liner system were kept to a minimum.\n35 Calculations were performed to estimate the risk of damage to the secondary high-density polyethylene\n36 liner during construction (Calculations for LERF Part B Permit Application [HNF 1997]). The greatest\n37 risk expected was from spreading the gravel layer over the geotextile layer and secondary geomembrane.\n38 The results of the calculations show that the strength of the geotextile was sufficiently high to withstand\n39 the stress of a small gravel spreader driving on a minimum of 15 centimeters of gravel over the geotextile\n40 and geomembrane. The likelihood of damage to the geomembrane lying under the geotextile was\n41 considered low.\n42 To avoid driving heavy machinery directly on the secondary liner, a 28-meter conveyer was used to\n43 deliver the drainage gravel into the basins. The gravel was spread and consolidated by hand tools and a\n44 bulldozer. The bulldozer traveled on a minimum thickness of 30.5 centimeters of gravel.\nAddendum C.34\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI Where the conveyer assembly was placed on top of the liner, cribbing was placed to distribute the\n2 conveyer weight. No heavy equipment was allowed for use directly in contact with the geomembranes.\n3 Additional calculations were performed to estimate the ability of the leachate riser pipe to withstand the\n4 static and dynamic loading imposed by lightweight construction equipment riding on the gravel layer\n5 (HNF 1997). Those calculations demonstrated that the pipe could buckle under the dynamic loading of\n6 small construction equipment; therefore, the pipe was avoided by equipment during spreading of the\n7 drainage gravel.\n8 Installation of synthetic lining materials proceeded only when winds were less than 24 kilometers per\n9 hour, and not during precipitation. The minimum ambient air temperature for unfolding or unrolling the\n10 high-density polyethylene sheets was -10 C, and a minimum temperature of 0 C was required for seaming\n11 the high-density polyethylene sheets. Between shifts, geomembranes and geotextile were anchored with\n12 sandbags to prevent lifting by wind. Calculations were performed to determine the appropriate spacing of\n13 sandbags on the geomembrane to resist lifting caused by 130 kilometer per hour winds (HNF 1997). All\n14 of the synthetic components contain UV light inhibitors and no impairment of performance is anticipated\n15 from the short-term UV light exposure during construction. Section C.5.2.4 provides further detail on\n16 exposure prevention.\n17 During the laying of the soil/bentonite layer and the overlying geomembrane, moisture content of the\n18 admixture was monitored and adjusted to ensure optimum compaction and to avoid development of\n19 cracks.\n20 C.5.2.1.3 Static and Dynamic Loads and Stresses from the Maximum Quantity of Waste\n21 When a LERF basin is full, liquid depth is approximately 6.4 meters. Static load on the primary liner is\n22 roughly 6,400 kilograms per square meter. Load on the secondary liner is slightly higher because of the\n23 weight of the gravel drainage layer. Assuming a density of 805 kilograms per square meter for the\n24 drainage gravel [conservative estimate based on specific gravity of 2.65 (Ambrose 1988)], the secondary\n25 high-density polyethylene liner carries approximately 7,200 kilograms per square meter when a basin is\n26 full.\n27 Side slope liner stresses were calculated for each of the layers in the basin sidewalls and for the pipe\n28 trench on the northwest corner of each basin (HNF 1997). Results of these calculations indicate factors of\n29 safety against shear were 1.5 or greater for the primary geomembrane, geotextile, geonet, and secondary\n30 geomembrane.\n31 Because the LERF is not located in an area of seismic concern, as identified in Appendix VI of\n32 40 CFR 264 and WAC 173-303-282(6)(a)(I), discussion and calculation of potential seismic events are\n33 not required.\n34 C.5.2.1.4 Stresses Resulting from Settlement, Subsidence, or Uplift\n35 Uplift stresses from natural sources are expected to have negligible impact on the liner. Groundwater lies\n36 approximately 62 meters below the LERF, average annual precipitation is only 16 centimeters, and the\n37 average unsaturated permeability of the soils near the basin bottoms is high, ranging from about\n38 5.5 x 104 centimeters per second to about I centimeter per second (Chen-Northern 199 1b). Therefore, no\n39 hydrostatic uplift forces are expected to develop in the soil underneath the basins. In addition, the soil\n40 under the basins consists primarily of gravel and sand, and contains few or no organic constituents.\n41 Therefore, uplift caused by gas production from organic degradation is not anticipated.\n42 Based on the design of the soil-bentonite liner, no structural uplift stresses are present within the lining\n43 system (Chen-Northern 199 1b).\n44 Regional subsidence is not anticipated because neither petroleum nor extractable economic minerals are\n45 present in the strata underlying the LERF basins, nor is karst (erosive limestone) topography present.\n46\nAddendum C.35\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 Dike soils and soil/bentonite layers were compacted thoroughly and proof-rolled during construction.\n2 Calculation of settlement potential showed that combined settlement for the foundation and soil/bentonite\n3 layer is expected to be about 2.7 centimeters. Settlement impact on the liner and basin stability is\n4 expected to be minimal (Chen-Northem 199 1b).\n5 C.5.2.1.5 Internal and External Pressure Gradients\n6 Pressure gradients across the liner system from groundwater are anticipated to be negligible. The LERF\n7 is about 62 meters above the seasonal high water table, which prevents buildup of water pressure below\n8 the liner. The native gravel foundation materials of the LERF are relatively permeable and free draining.\n9 The 2 percent slope of the secondary liner prevents the pooling of liquids on top of the secondary liner.\n10 Finally, the fill rate of the basins is slow enough (average 190 liters per minute) that the load of the liquid\n11 waste on the primary liner is gradually and evenly distributed.\n12 To prevent the buildup of gas between the liners, each basin is equipped with 21 vents in the primary\n13 geomembrane located above the maximum water level that allow the reduction of any excess gas\n14 pressure. Gas passing through these vents exit through a single pipe that penetrates the anchor wall into a\n15 carbon adsorption filter. This filter extracts nearly all of the organic compounds, ensuring that emissions\n16 to the air from the basins are not toxic.\n17 C.5.2.2 Liner System Location Relative to High-Water Table\n18 The lowest point of each LERF basin is the northwest corner of the sump, where the typical subgrade\n19 elevation is 175 meters above mean sea level. Based on data collected from the groundwater monitoring\n20 wells at the LERF site, the seasonal high-water table is located approximately 62 meters or more below\n21 the lowest point of the basins. This substantial thickness of unsaturated strata beneath the LERF provides\n22 ample protection to the liner from hydrostatic pressure because of groundwater intrusion into the\n23 soil/bentonite layer. Further discussion of the unsaturated zone and site hydrogeology is provided in\n24 Addendum D, Groundwater Monitoring Plan.\n25 C.5.2.3 Liner System Foundation\n26 Foundation materials are primarily gravels and cobbles with some sand and silt. The native soils onsite\n27 are derived from unconsolidated Holocene sediments. These sediments are fluvial and glaciofluvial sands\n28 and gravels deposited during the most recent glacial and postglacial event. Grain-size distributions and\n29 shape analyses of the sediments indicate that deposition occurred in a high-energy environment (Chen-\n30 Northern 1990).\n31 Analysis of five soil borings from the LERF site was conducted to characterize the natural foundation\n32 materials and to determine the suitability of onsite soils for construction of the impoundment dikes and\n33 determine optimal design factors. Well-graded gravel containing varying amounts of silt, sand, and\n34 cobbles comprises the layer in which the basins were excavated. This gravel layer extends to depths of\n35 10 to 11 meters below land surface (Chen-Northern 1990). The basins are constructed directly on the\n36 subgrade. Excavated soils were screened to remove oversize cobbles (greater than 15 centimeters in the\n37 largest dimension) and used to construct the dikes.\n38 Settlement potential of the foundation material and soil/bentonite layer was found to be low. The\n39 foundation is comprised of undisturbed native soils. The bottom of the basin excavation lies within the\n40 well-graded gravel layer, and is dense to very dense. Below the gravel is a layer of dense to very dense\n41 poorly graded and well-graded sand. Settlement was calculated for the gravel foundation soils and for the\n42 soil/bentonite layer, under the condition of hydrostatic loading from 6.4 meters of fluid depth. The\n43 combined settlement for the soils and the soil/bentonite layer is estimated to be about 2.7 centimeters.\n44 This amount of settlement is expected to have minimal impact on overall liner or basin stability\n45 (Chen-Northem 199 1b). Settlement calculations are provided in Calculations for Liquid Effluent\n46 Retention Facility Part B Permit Application (HNF 1997).\n47\nAddendum C.36\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 The load bearing capacity of the foundation material, based on the soil analysis discussed previously, is\n2 estimated at about 48,800 kilograms per square meter [maximum advisable presumptive bearing capacity\n3 (Hough 1969)]. Anticipated static and dynamic loading from a full basin is estimated to be less than\n4 9,000 kilograms per square meter (Section C.5.2.1.3), which provides an ample factor of safety.\n5 When the basins are empty, excess hydrostatic pressure in the foundation materials under the liner system\n6 theoretically could result in uplift and damage. However, because the native soil forming the foundations\n7 is unsaturated and relatively permeable, and because the water table is located at a considerable depth\n8 beneath the basins, any infiltration of surface water at the edge of the basin is expected to travel\n9 predominantly downward and away from the basins, rather than collecting under the excavation itself.\n10 No gas is expected in the foundation because gas-generating organic materials are not present.\n11 Subsidence of undisturbed foundation materials is generally the result of fluid extraction (water or\n12 petroleum), mining, or karst topography. Neither petroleum, mineral resources, nor karst are believed to\n13 be present in the sediments overlying the Columbia River basalts. Potential groundwater resources do\n14 exist below the LERF. Even if these sediments were to consolidate from fluid withdrawal, their depth\n15 most likely would produce a broad, gently sloping area of subsidence that would not cause significant\n16 strains in the LERF liner system. Consequently, the potential for subsidence related failures are expected\n17 to be negligible.\n18 Borings at the LERF site, and extensive additional borings in the 200 East Area, have not identified any\n19 significant quantities of soluble materials in the foundation soil or underlying sediments (Last et al. 1989).\n20 Consequently, the potential for sinkholes is considered negligible.\n21 C.5.2.4 Liner System Exposure Prevention\n22 Both primary and secondary geomembranes and the floating cover are stabilized with carbon black to\n23 prevent degradation from UV light. Furthermore, none of the liner layers experience long-term exposure\n24 to the elements. During construction, thin polyethylene sheeting was used to maintain optimum moisture\n25 content and provide protection from the wind for the soil/bentonite layer until the secondary\n26 geomembrane was laid in place. The secondary geomembrane was covered by the geonet and geotextile\n27 as soon as quality control testing was complete. Once the geotextile layer was completed, drainage\n28 material immediately was placed over the geotextile. The final (upper) geotextile layer was placed over\n29 the drainage gravel and immediately covered by the bentonite carpet liner. This was covered\n30 immediately, in turn, by the primary high-density polyethylene liner.\n31 Both high-density polyethylene liners, geotextile layers, and geonet are anchored permanently to a\n32 concrete wall at the top of the basin berm. During construction, liners were held in place with many\n33 sandbags on both the basin bottoms and side slopes to prevent wind from lifting and damaging the\n34 materials. Calculations were performed to determine the amount of fluid needed in a basin to prevent\n35 wind lift damage to the primary geomembrane. Approximately 15 to 20 centimeters of solution are kept\n36 in each basin to minimize the potential for uplifting the primary liner (HNF 1997).\n37 The entire lining system is covered by a very low-density polyethylene floating cover that is bolted to the\n38 concrete anchor wall. The floating cover prevents evaporation and intrusion from dust, precipitation,\n39 vegetation, animals, and birds. A patented tensioning system is employed to prevent wind from lifting the\n40 cover and automatically accommodate changes in liquid level in the basins. The cover tension\n41 mechanism consists of a cable running from the flexible geosynthetic cover over a pulley on the tension\n42 tower (located on the concrete anchor wall) to a dead man anchor. These anchors (blocks) simply hang\n43 from the cables on the exterior side of the tension towers. The anchor wall also provides for solid\n44 attachment of the liner layers and the cover, using a 6.4-millimeter batten and neoprene gasket to bolt the\n45 layers to the concrete wall, effectively sealing the basin from the intrusion of light, precipitation, and\n46 airborne dust (Figure C.16).\n47\nAddendum C.37\n WA7890008967LERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 The floating cover, made of very low-density polyethylene with UV light inhibitors, is not anticipated to\n2 experience unacceptable degradation during the service life of the LERF. The very low-density\n3 polyethylene material contains carbon black for UV light protection, anti-oxidants to prevent heat\n4 degradation, and seaming enhancers to improve its ability to be welded. A typical manufacturer's limited\n5 warranty for weathering of very low-density polyethylene products is 20 years (Poly America, undated).\n6 This provides a margin of safety for the anticipated medium-term use of the LERF for aqueous waste\n7 storage.\n8 The upper 3.4 to 4.6 meters of the sidewall liner also could experience stresses in response to temperature\n9 changes. Accommodation of thermal influences for the LERF geosynthetic layers is affected by inclusion\n10 of sufficient slack as the liners were installed. Calculations demonstrate that approximately\n11 67 centimeters of slack is required in the long basin bottom dimension, 46 centimeters across the basin,\n12 and 34 centimeters from the bottom of the basin to the top of the basin wall (HNF 1997).\n13 Thermal stresses also are experienced by the floating cover. As with the geomembranes, sufficient slack\n14 was included in the design to accommodate thermal contraction and expansion.\n15 C.5.2.4.1 Liner Repairs During Operations\n16 Should repair of a basin liner be required while the basin is in operation, the basin contents will be\n17 transferred to the 200 Area ETF or another available basin. After the liner around the leaking section is\n18 cleaned, repairs to the geomembrane will be made by the application of a piece of high-density\n19 polyethylene sheeting, sufficient in size to extend approximately 8 to 15 centimeters beyond the damaged\n20 area, or as recommended by the vendor. A round or oval patch will be installed using the same type of\n21 equipment and criteria used for the initial field installations.\n22 C.5.2.4.2 Control of Air Emissions\n23 The floating covers limit evaporation of aqueous waste and releases of volatile organic compounds into\n24 the atmosphere. To accommodate volumetric changes in the air between the fluid in the basin and the\n25 cover, and to avoid problems related to 'sealing' the basins too tightly, each basin is equipped with a\n26 carbon filter breather vent system. Any air escaping from the basins must pass through this vent,\n27 consisting of a pipe that penetrates the anchor wall and extends into a carbon adsorption filter unit.\n28 C.5.2.5 Liner Coverage\n29 The liner system covers the entire ground surface that underlies the retention basins. The primary liner\n30 extends up the side slopes to a concrete anchor wall at the top of the dike encircling the entire basin\n31 (Figure C.16).\n32 C.5.3 Prevention of Overtopping\n33 Overtopping prevention is accomplished through administrative controls and liquid-level instrumentation\n34 installed in each basin. The instrumentation includes local liquid-level indication as well as remote\n35 indication at the ETF. Before an aqueous waste is transferred into a basin, administrative controls are\n36 implemented to ensure overtopping will not occur during the transfer. The volume of feed to be\n37 transferred is compared to the available volume in the receiving basin. The transfer is not initiated unless\n38 there is sufficient volume available in the receiving basin or a cut-off level is established. The transfer\n39 into the basin would be stopped when this cut-off level is reached.\n40 In the event of a 25-year, 24-hour storm event, precipitation would accumulate on the basin covers.\n41 Through the self-tensioning design of the basin covers and maintenance of adequate freeboard, all\n42 accumulated precipitation would be contained on the covers and none would flow over the dikes or\n43 anchor walls. The 25-year, 24-hour storm is expected to deliver 5.3 centimeters of rain or approximately\n44 61 centimeters of snow. Cover specifications include the requirement that the covers be able to withstand\n45 the load from this amount of precipitation. Because the cover floats on the surface of the fluid in the\n46 basin, the fluid itself provides the primary support for the weight of the accumulated precipitation.\nAddendum C.38\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI Through the cover self-tensioning mechanism, there is ample 'give' to accommodate the overlying load\n2 without overstressing the anchor and attachment points.\n3 Rainwater and snow evaporate readily from the cover, particularly in the arid Hanford Facility climate,\n4 where evaporation rates exceed precipitation rates for most months of the year. The black color of the\n5 cover further enhances evaporation. Thus, the floating cover prevents the intrusion of precipitation into\n6 the basin and provides for evaporation of accumulated rain or snow.\n7 C.5.3.1 Freeboard\n8 Under current operating conditions, 0.61 meter of freeboard is maintained at each LERF basin, which\n9 corresponds to an operating level of 6.8 meters, or 29.5 million liters.\n10 C.5.3.2 Immediate Flow Shutoff\n11 The mechanism for transferring aqueous waste is either through pump transfers with on/off switches or\n12 through gravity transfers with isolation valves. These methods provide positive ability to shut off\n13 transfers immediately in the event of overtopping. Overtopping a basin during a transfer is very unlikely\n14 because the low flow rate into the basin provides long response times. At a flow rate of 284 liters per\n15 minute, approximately 11 days would be required to fill a LERF basin from the 6.8-meter operating level\n16 (i.e., 0.61 meter of freeboard) to maximum capacity of 34 million liters (i.e., the 7.4-meter level).\n17 C.5.3.3 Oufflow Destination\n18 Aqueous waste in the LERF is transferred routinely to 200 Area ETF for treatment. However, should it\n19 be necessary to immediately empty a basin, the aqueous waste either would be transferred to the 200 Area\n20 ETF for treatment or transferred to another basin (or basins), whichever is faster. If necessary a\n21 temporary pumping system may be installed to increase the transfer rate.\n22 C.5.4 Structural Integrity of Dikes\n23 The structural integrity of the dikes was certified attesting to the structural integrity of the dikes, signed\n24 by a qualified, registered professional engineer.\n25 C.5.4.1 Dike Design, Construction, and Maintenance\n26 The dikes of the LERF are constructed of onsite native soils, generally consisting of cobbles and gravels.\n27 Well-graded mixtures were specified, with cobbles up to 15 centimeters in the largest dimension, but not\n28 constituting more than 20 percent of the volume of the fill. The dikes are designed with a 3:1 (3 units\n29 horizontal to 1 unit vertical) slope on the basin side, and 2.25:1 on the exterior side. The dikes are\n30 approximately 8.2 meters high from the bottom of the basin, and 3 meters above grade.\n31 Calculations were performed to verify the structural integrity of the dikes (HNF 1997). The calculations\n32 demonstrate that the structural strength of the dikes is such that, without dependence on any lining\n33 system, the sides of the basins can withstand the pressure exerted by the maximum allowable quantity of\n34 fluid in the impoundment. The dikes have a factor of safety greater than 2.5 against failure by sliding.\n35 C.5.4.2 Dike Stability and Protection\n36 In the following paragraphs, various aspects of stability for the LERF dikes and the concrete anchor wall\n37 are presented, including slope failure, hydrostatic pressure, and protection from the environment.\n38 Failure in Dike/Impoundment Cut Slopes. A slope stability analysis was performed to determine the\n39 factor of safety against slope failure. The computer program 'PCSTABL5' from Purdue University, using\n40 the modified Janbu Method, was employed to evaluate slope stability under both static and seismic\n41 loading cases. One hundred surfaces per run were generated and analyzed. The assumptions used were\n42 as follows (Chen-Northem 1991b):\n43 * Weight of gravel: 2,160 kilograms per cubic meter.\n44 * Maximum dry density of gravel: 2,315 kilograms per cubic meter.\nAddendum C.39\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 * Mohr-Coulomb shear strength angle for gravel: minimum 33 degrees.\n2 * Weight of soil/bentonite: 1,600 kilograms per cubic meter.\n3 * Mohr-Coulomb shear strength angle for soil/bentonite: minimum 30 degrees.\n4 * Slope: 3 horizontal: I vertical.\n5 * No fluid in impoundment (worst case for stability).\n6 * Soils at in-place moisture (not saturated conditions).\n7 Results of the static stability analysis showed that the dike slopes were stable with a minimum factor of\n8 safety of 1.77 (Chen-Northern 199 1b).\n9 The standard horizontal acceleration required in the Hanford Plant Standards, \"Standard Architectural-\n10 Civil Design Criteria, Design Loads for Facilities\" (DOE-RL 1988), for structures on the Hanford Site is\n11 0.12 g. Adequate factors of safety for cut slopes in units of this type generally are considered 1.5 for\n12 static conditions and 1.1 for dynamic stability (Golder 1989). Results of the stability analysis showed that\n13 the LERF basin slopes were stable under horizontal accelerations of 0.10 and 0.15 g, with minimum\n14 factors of safety of 1.32 and 1.17, respectively (Chen-Northern 1991b). Printouts from the PCSTABL5\n15 program are provided in Calculations for Liquid Effluent Retention Facility Part B Permit Application\n16 (HNF 1997).\n17 Hydrostatic Pressure. Failure of the dikes due to buildup of hydrostatic pressure, caused by failure of\n18 the leachate system or liners, is very unlikely. The liner system is constructed with two essentially\n19 impermeable layers consisting of a synthetic layer overlying a soil layer with low-hydraulic conductivity.\n20 It would require a catastrophic failure of both liners to cause hydrostatic pressures that could endanger\n21 dike integrity. Routine inspections of the leachate detection system, indicating quantities of leachate\n22 removed from the basins, provide an early warning of leakage or operational problems that could lead to\n23 excessive hydrostatic pressure. A significant precipitation event (e.g., a 25-year, 24-hour storm) will not\n24 create a hydrostatic problem because the interior sidewalls of the basins are covered completely by the\n25 liners. The covers can accommodate this volume of precipitation without overtopping the dike\n26 (Section C.5.3), and the coarse nature of the dike and foundation materials on the exterior walls provides\n27 for rapid drainage of precipitation away from the basins.\n28 Protection from Root Systems. Risk to structural integrity of the dikes because of penetrating root\n29 systems is minimal. Excavation and construction removed all vegetation on and around the\n30 impoundments, and native plants (such as sagebrush) grow very slowly. The large grain size of the\n31 cobbles and gravel used as dike construction material do not provide an advantageous germination\n32 medium for native plants. Should plants with extending roots become apparent on the dike walls, the\n33 plants will be controlled with appropriate herbicide application.\n34 Protection from Burrowing Mammals. The cobble size materials that make up the dike construction\n35 material and the exposed nature of the dike sidewalls do not offer an advantageous habitat for burrowing\n36 mammals. Lack of vegetation on the LERF site discourages foraging. The risk to structural integrity of\n37 the dikes from burrowing mammals is therefore minimal. Periodic visual inspections of the dikes provide\n38 observations of any animals present. Should burrowing mammals be noted onsite, appropriate pest\n39 control methods such as trapping or application of rodenticides will be employed.\n40 Protective Cover. Approximately 7.6 centimeters of crushed gravel serve as the cover of the exterior\n41 dike walls. This coarse material is inherently resistant to the effect of wind because of its large grain size.\n42 Total annual precipitation is low (16 centimeters) and a significant storm event (e.g., a 25-year, 24-hour\n43 storm) could result in about 5.3 centimeters of precipitation in a 24-hour period. The absorbent capacity\n44 of the soil exceeds this precipitation rate; therefore, the impact of wind and precipitation run-on to the\n45 exterior dike walls will be minimal.\nAddendum C.40\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 C.5.5 Piping Systems\n2 Aqueous waste from the 242-A Evaporator is transferred to the LERF using a pump located in the\n3 242-A Evaporator and approximately 1,500 meters of pipe, consisting of a 3-inch carrier pipe within a\n4 6-inch outer containment pipeline. Flow through the pump is controlled through a valve at flow rates\n5 from 150 to 300 liters per minute. The pipeline exits the 242-A Evaporator below grade and remains\n6 below grade at a minimum 1.2 meter depth for freeze protection, until the pipeline emerges at the LERF\n7 catch basin, at the corner of each basin. All piping at the catch basin that is less than 1.2 meters below\n8 grade is wrapped with electric heat tracing tape and insulated for protection from freezing.\n9 The transfer line from the 242-A Evaporator is centrifugally cast, fiberglass-reinforced epoxy thermoset\n10 resin pressure pipe fabricated to meet the requirements of ASME D2997 (ASME 1984). The 3-inch\n11 carrier piping is centered and supported within 6-inch containment piping. Pipe supports are fabricated of\n12 the same material as the pipe, and meet the strength requirements of ANSI B31.3 (ANSI 1987) for dead\n13 weight, thermal, and seismic loads. A catch basin is provided at the northwest comer of each basin where\n14 piping extends from the basin to allow for basin-to-basin and basin-to-200 Area ETF liquid transfers.\n15 Drawing H-2-88766, Sheets I through 4, provide schematic diagrams of the piping system at LERF.\n16 Drawing H-2-79604 provides details of the piping from the 242-A Evaporator to LERF.\n17 C.5.5.1 Secondary Containment System for Piping\n18 The 6-inch containment piping encases the 3-inch carrier pipe from the 242-A Evaporator to the LERF.\n19 All of the piping and fittings that are not directly over a catch basin or a basin liner are of this pipe-\n20 within-a-pipe construction. A catch basin is provided at the northwest corner of each basin where the\n21 inlet pipes, leachate risers, and transfer pipe risers emerge from the basin. The catch basin consists of a\n22 20-centimeter-thick concrete pad at the top of the dike. The perimeter of the catch basin has a\n23 20-centimeter-high curb, and the concrete is coated with a chemical resistant epoxy sealant. The concrete\n24 pad is sloped so that any leaks or spills from the piping or pipe connections will drain into the basin. The\n25 catch basin provides an access point for inspecting, servicing, and operating various systems such as\n26 transfer valving, leachate level instrumentation and leachate pump. Drawing H-2-79593 provides a\n27 schematic diagram of the catch basins.\n28 C.5.5.2 Leak Detection System\n29 During operation, the 242-A Evaporator receives dilute tank waste directly from the Tank Farms, treats\n30 waste by evaporation, and returns the concentrated waste to Tank Farms. The process condensate which\n31 is generated is transferred to LERF. Single-point electronic leak detection elements are installed along\n32 the transfer line at 305-meter intervals. The leak detection elements are located in the bottom of specially\n33 designed test risers. Each sensor element employs a conductivity sensor, which is connected to a cable\n34 leading back to the 242-A Evaporator control room. If a leak develops in the carrier pipe, fluid will travel\n35 down the exterior surface of the carrier pipe or the interior of the containment pipe. As moisture contacts\n36 a sensor unit, an alarm sounds in the ETF control room, which is monitored continuously when the 242-A\n37 evaporator is transferring liquids to LERF. If the alarm sounds, ETF Operations staff troubleshoots the\n38 alarm and, upon verification of a leak, requests that the pump located in the 242-A Evaporator be shut\n39 down to stop the flow of process condensate through the transfer line. The 242-A Evaporator has limited\n40 surge capacity, and its operation is closely tied to supporting Tank Farm operations. The flow of process\n41 condensate to LERF is not stopped automatically by indication of a possible leak in the primary transfer\n42 line. A low-volume air purge of the annulus between the carrier pipe and the containment pipe is\n43 provided to prevent condensation buildup and minimize false alarms by the leak detection elements.\n44 The catch basins have conductivity leak detectors that alarm in the ETF control room. Leak detector\n45 alarms are monitored in the control room continuously during aqueous waste transfers and at least daily\n46 when no transfers are occurring. Leaks into the catch basins drain back to the basin through a 5.1-\n47 centimeter drain on the floor of the catch basin.\nAddendum C.41\n WA7890008967LERF and 200 Area ETF\nI C.5.5.3 Certification\n2 Although an integrity assessment is not required for piping associated with surface impoundments, an\n3 assessment of the transfer liner was performed, including a hydrostatic leak/pressure test at\n4 10.5 kilograms per square centimeter gauge. A statement by an independent, qualified, registered\n5 professional engineer attesting to the integrity of the piping system is included in Integrity Assessment\n6 Report for the 242-A Evaporator/LERF Waste Transfer Piping, Project W105 (WHC 1993), along with\n7 the results of the leak/pressure test.\n8 C.5.6 Double Liner and Leak Detection, Collection, and Removal System\n9 The double-liner system for LERF is discussed in Section C.5.2. The leachate detection, collection, and\n10 removal system (Figure C.18) as designed and constructed to remove leachate that might permeate the\n11 primary liner. System components for each basin include:\n12 * 30.5-centimeter layer of drainage gravel below the primary liner at the bottom of the basin\n13 * Geonet below the primary liner on the sidewalls to direct leachate to the gravel layer\n14 * 3.0-meter by 1.8-meter by 0.30-meter-deep leachate collection sump consisting of a 25 millimeter\n15 high-density polyethylene flat stock, geotextile to trap large particles in the leachate, and\n16 1.5-millimeter high-density polyethylene rub sheet set on the secondary liner\n17 * 10-inch and 4-inch perforated leachate high-density polyethylene riser pipes from the leachate\n18 collection sump to the catch basin northwest of the basin\n19 * Leachate collection sump level instrumentation installed in the 4-inch riser\n20 * Level sensors, submersible leachate pump, and 1.5-inch fiberglass-reinforced epoxy thermoset\n21 resin pressure piping installed in the 10-inch riser\n22 * Piping at the catch basin to route the leachate through 1.5-inch high-density polyethylene pipe\n23 back to the basins\n24 The bottom of the basins has a two percent slope to allow gravity flow of leachate to the leachate\n25 collection sump. This exceeds the minimum of 1 percent slope required by WAC 173-303-650(j) for new\n26 surface impoundments. Material specifications for the leachate collection system are given in\n27 Section C.5.2.1.1.\n28 Calculations demonstrate that fluid from a small hole (2 millimeter) (EPA 1989, p. 122) at the furthest\n29 end of the basin, under a low head situation, would travel to the sump in less than 24 hours (HNF 1997).\n30 Additional calculations indicate the capacity of the pump to remove leachate is sufficient to allow time to\n31 readily identify a leak and activate emergency procedures (HNF 1997).\n32 The fluid level in each leachate sump is required to be maintained below 33 centimeters to prevent\n33 significant liquid backup into the drainage layer. The leachate pump is activated when the liquid level in\n34 the sump reaches about 28 centimeters, and is shut off when the sump liquid level reaches about\n35 18 centimeters. This operation may be done either manually or automatically. Liquid level control is\n36 accomplished with conductivity probes that trigger relays selected specifically for application to\n37 submersible pumps and leachate fluids. A flow meter/totalizer on the leachate return pipe measures fluid\n38 volumes pumped and pumping rate from the leachate collection sumps, and indicates volume and flow\n39 'rate on local readouts. In addition, a timer on the leachate pump tracks the cumulative pump operating\n40 time. Other instrumentation provided is real-time continuous level monitoring with readout at the catch\n41 basin. Leachate levels are monitored at least weekly. A sampling port is provided in the leachate piping\n42 system at the catch basin. The leak rate through the primary liner can be calculated using two methods: 1)\n43 measured as the leachate flow meter/totalizer readings (flow meters/totalizers are located on the outflow\n44 line from the collection sumps in the bottom of the LERF basins), and 2) calculated using the pump\n45 operating time readings multiplied by the pump flow rate (the pump runs at a constant flow rate).\n46 Calculations using either method are sufficient for compliance. For more information on inspections,\n47 refer to Addendum 1.\nAddendum C.42\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 The stainless steel leachate pump delivers 5 gallons per minute (19 liters per minute). The leachate pump\n2 returns draw liquid from the sump via 1.5-inch pipe and discharges into the basin through 1.5-inch high-\n3 density polyethylene pipe.\n4 C.5.7 Construction Quality Assurance\n5 The construction quality assurance plan and complete report of construction quality assurance inspection\n6 and testing results are provided in 242-A Evaporator Interim Retention Basin Construction Quality\n7 Assurance Plan (KEH 1991). A general description of construction quality assurance procedures is\n8 outlined in the following paragraphs.\n9 For excavation of the basins and construction of the dikes, regular inspections were conducted to ensure\n10 compliance with procedures and drawings, and compaction tests were performed on the dike soils.\n11 For the soil/bentonite layer, test fills were first conducted in accordance with EPA guidance to\n12 demonstrate compaction procedures and to confirm compaction and permeability requirements can be\n13 met. The ratio of bentonite to soil and moisture content was monitored; lifts did not exceed\n14 15 centimeters before compaction, and specific compaction procedures were followed. Laboratory and\n15 field tests of soil properties were performed for each lift and for the completed test fill. The same suite of\n16 tests was conducted for each lift during the laying of the soil/bentonite admixture in the basins.\n17 Geotextiles and geomembranes were laid in accordance with detailed procedures and quality assurance\n18 programs provided by the manufacturers and installers. These included destructive and nondestructive\n19 tests on the geomembrane seams, and documentation of field test results and repairs.\n20 C.5.8 Proposed Action Leakage Rate and Response Action Plan\n21 An action leakage rate limit is established where action must be taken due to excessive leakage from the\n22 primary liner. The action leak rate is based on the maximum design flow rate the leak detection system\n23 can remove without the fluid head on the bottom liner exceeding 30 centimeters. The limiting factor in\n24 the leachate removal rate is the hydraulic conductivity of the drainage gravel. An action leakage rate\n25 (also called the rapid or large leak rate) of 20,000 liters per hectare per day (2,100 gallons/acre/day) was\n26 calculated for each basin (WHC 1992b).\n27 When it is determined that the action leakage rate has been exceeded, the response action plan will follow\n28 the actions in WAC 173-303-650(1 1)(b) and (c), which includes notification of Ecology in writing\n29 within 7 days, assessing possible causes of the leak, and determining whether waste receipt should be\n30 curtailed and/or the basin emptied.\n31 C.5.9 Dike Structural Integrity Engineering Certification\n32 The structural integrity of the dikes was certified attesting to the structural integrity of the dikes, signed\n33 by a qualified, registered professional engineer.\n34 C.S.10 Management of Ignitable, Reactive, or Incompatible Wastes\n35 Although ignitable or reactive aqueous waste might be received in small quantities at LERF, such\n36 aqueous waste is mixed with dilute solutions in the basins, removing the ignitable or reactive\n37 characteristics. For compatibility requirements with the LERF liner, refer to Addendum B, Waste\n38 Analysis Plan.\n39 C.6 Air Emissions Control\n40 This section addresses the 200 Area ETF requirements of Air Emission Standards for Process Vents,\n41 under 40 CFR 264, Subpart AA (WAC 173-303-690 incorporated by reference) and Subpart CC. The\n42 requirements of 40 CFR 264, Subpart BB (WAC 173-303-691) is not applicable because aqueous waste\n43 with 10 percent or greater organic concentration would not be acceptable for processing at the ETF.\nAddendum C.43\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 C.6.1 Applicability of Subpart AA Standards\n2 The 200 Area ETF evaporator and thin film dryer perform operations that specifically require evaluation\n3 for applicability of WAC 173-303-690. Aqueous waste in these units routinely contains greater than 10\n4 parts per million concentrations of organic compounds and are, therefore, subject to air emission\n5 requirements under WAC 173-303-690. Organic emissions from all affected process vents on the\n6 Hanford Facility must be less than 1.4 kilograms per hour and 2.8 mega grams per year, or control\n7 devices must be installed to reduce organic emissions by 95 percent.\n8 The vessel off gas system provides a process vent system. This system provides a slight vacuum on the\n9 200 Area ETF process vessels and tanks (refer to Section C.2.5.2). Two vessel vent header pipes\n10 combine and enter the vessel off gas system filter unit consisting of a demister, electric heater, prefilter,\n11 high-efficiency particulate air filters, activated carbon absorber, and two exhaust fans (one fan in service\n12 while the other is backup). The vessel off gas system filter unit is located in the high-efficiency\n13 particulate air filter room west of the process area. The vessel off gas system exhaust discharges into the\n14 larger building ventilation system, with the exhaust fans and stack located outside and immediately west\n15 of the ETF. The exhaust stack discharge point is 15.5 meters above ground level.\n16 The annual average flow rate for the 200 Area ETF stack (which is the combined vessel off gas and\n17 building exhaust flow rates) is 1600 cubic meters per minute with a total annual flow of approximately\n18 8.4 E+08 cubic meters. During waste processing, the airflow through just the vessel off gas system is\n19 about 23 standard cubic meters per minute.\n20 Organic emissions occur during waste processing, which occurs less than 310 days each year\n21 (i.e., 85 percent operating efficiency). This operating efficiency represents the maximum annual\n22 operating time for the ETF, as shutdowns are required during the year for planned maintenance outages\n23 and for reconfiguring the 200 Area ETF to accommodate different aqueous waste.\n24 C.6.2 Process Vents -Demonstrating Compliance\n25 This section outlines how the 200 Area ETF complies with the requirements and includes a discussion of\n26 the basis for meeting the organic emissions limits, calculations demonstrating compliance, and conditions\n27 for reevaluation.\n28 C.6.2.1 Basis for Meeting Limits/Reductions\n29 The 242-A Evaporator and the 200 Area ETF are currently the only operating TSD units that contribute to\n30 the Hanford Facility volatile organic emissions under 40 CFR 264, Subpart AA. The combined release\n31 rate is currently well below the threshold of 1.4 kilograms per hour or 2,800 kilograms per year of volatile\n32 organic compounds. As a result, the 200 Area ETF meets these standards without the use of air pollution\n33 control devices.\n34 The amount of organic emissions could change as waste streams are changed, or TSD units are brought\n35 online or are deactivated. The organic air emissions summation will be re-evaluated periodically as\n36 condition warrants. Operations of the TSD units operating under 40 CFR 264, Subpart AA, will be\n37 controlled to maintain Hanford Facility emissions below the threshold limits or pollution control device(s)\n38 will be added, as necessary, to achieve the reduction standards specified under 40 CFR 264, Subpart AA.\n39 C.6.2.2 Demonstrating Compliance\n40 Calculations to determine organic emissions are performed using the following assumptions:\n41 * Maximum flow rate from LERF to 200 Area ETF is 568 liters per minute.\n42 * Emissions of organics from tanks and vessels upstream of the UV/OX process are determined\n43 from flow and transfer rates given in Clean Air Act Requirements, WAC 173-400 As-built\n44 Documentation, Project C-018H, 242-A Evaporator/P UREX Plant Process Condensate\n45 Treatment Facility (Adtechs 1995).\n46\nAddendum C.44\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 * UV/OX reaction rate constants and residence times are used to determine the amount of organics,\n2 which are destroyed in the UV/OX process. These constants are given in 200 Area Effluent\n3 Treatment Facility Delisting Petition (DOE/RL 1992).\n4 * All organic compounds that are not destroyed in the UV/OX process are assumed to be emitted\n5 from the tanks and vessels into the vessel off gas system.\n6 * No credit for removal of organic compounds in the vessel off gas system carbon absorber unit is\n7 taken. The activated carbon absorbers are used if required to reduce organic emissions.\n8 The calculation to determine organic emissions consists of the following steps:\n9 1. Determine the quantity of organics emitted from the tanks or vessels upstream of the UV/OX\n10 process, using transfer rate values\n11 2. Determine the concentration of organics in the waste after the UV/OX process using UV/OX\n12 reaction rates and residence times. If the 200 Area ETF is configured such that the UV/OX\n13 process is not used, a residence time of zero is used in the calculations (i.e., none of the organics\n14 are destroyed)\n15 3. Assuming all the remaining organics are emitted, determine the rate which the organics are\n16 emitted using the feed flow rate and the concentrations of organics after the UV/OX process\n17 4. The amount of organics emitted from the vessel off gas system is the sum of the amount\n18 calculated in steps I and 3.\n19 The organic emission rates and quantity of organics emitted during processing are determined using these\n20 calculations and are included in the Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF and 200 Area ETF file.\n21 C.6.2.3 Reevaluating Compliance with Subpart AA Standards\n22 Calculations to determine compliance with Subpart AA will be reviewed when any of the following\n23 conditions occur at the 200 Area ETF:\n24 * Changes in the maximum feed rate to the 200 Area ETF (i.e., greater than the 568 liters per\n25 minute flow rate)\n26 * Changes in the configuration or operation of the 200 Area ETF that would modify the\n27 assumptions given in Section C.6.2.2 (e.g., taking credit for the carbon absorbers as a control\n28 device)\n29 * Annual operating time exceeds 310 days.\n30 C.6.3 Applicability of Subpart CC Standards\n31 The air emission standards of 40 CFR 264, Subpart CC apply to tank, surface impoundment, and\n32 container storage units that manage wastes with average volatile organic concentrations equal to or\n33 exceeding 500 parts per million by weight, based on the hazardous waste composition at the point of\n34 origination (61 FR 59972). However, TSD units that are used solely for management of mixed waste are\n35 exempt. Mixed waste is managed at the LERF and 200 Area ETF and dangerous waste could be treated\n36 and stored at these TSD units.\n37 TSD owner/operators are not required to determine the concentration of volatile organic compounds in a\n38 hazardous waste if the wastes are placed in waste management units that employ air emission controls\n39 that comply with the Subpart CC standards. Therefore, the approach to Subpart CC compliance at the\n40 LERF and 200 Area ETF is to demonstrate that the LERF and 200 Area ETF meet the Subpart CC control\n41 standards (40 CFR 264.1084 -40 CFR 264.1086).\n42 C.6.3.1 Demonstrating Compliance with Subpart CC for Tanks\n43 Since the 200 Area ETF tanks already have process vents regulated under 40 CFR 264, Subpart AA\n44 (WAC 173-303-690), they are exempt from Subpart CC [40 CFR 264.1080(b)(8)].\nAddendum C.45\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI C.6.3.2 Demonstrating Compliance with Subpart CC for Containers\n2 Container Level 1 and Level 2 standards are met at the 200 Area ETF by managing all dangerous and/or\n3 mixed wastes in U.S. Department of Transportation containers [40 CFR 264.1086(f)]. Level 1 containers\n4 are those that store more than 0.1 cubic meters and less than or equal to 0.46 cubic meters. Level 2\n5 containers are used to store more than 0.46 cubic meters of waste, which are in 'light material service'.\n6 Light material service is defined where a waste in the container has one or more organic constituents\n7 with a vapor pressure greater than 0.3 kilopascals at 20 C, and the total concentration of such\n8 constituents is greater than or equal to 20 percent by weight.\n9 The monitoring requirements for Level I and Level 2 containers include a visual inspection when the\n10 container is received at the 200 Area ETF and when the waste is initially placed in the container.\n11 Additionally, at least once every 12 months when stored onsite for 1 year or more, these containers must\n12 be inspected.\n13 If compliant containers are not used at the 200 Area ETF, alternate container management practices are\n14 used that comply with the Level I standards. Specifically, the Level I standards allow for a \"container\n15 equipped with a cover and closure devices that form a continuous barrier over the container openings such\n16 that when the cover and closure devices are secured in the closed position there are no visible holes, gaps,\n17 or other open spaces into the interior of the container. The cover may be a separate cover installed on the\n18 container...or may be an integral part of the container structural design...\" [40 CFR 264.1086(c)(1)(ii)].\n19 An organic-vapor-suppressing barrier, such as foam, may also be used [40 CFR 264.1086(c)(1)(iii)].\n20 Section C.3 provides detail on container management practices at the 200 Area ETF.\n21 Container Level 3 standards apply when a container is used for the \"treatment of a hazardous waste by a\n22 waste stabilization process\" [40 CFR 264.1086(2)]. Because treatment in containers using the\n23 stabilization process is not provided at the 200 Area ETF, these standards do not apply.\n24 C.6.3.3 Demonstrating Compliance with Subpart CC for Surface Impoundments\n25 The Subpart CC emission standards are met at LERF using a floating membrane cover that is constructed\n26 of very-low-density polyethylene that forms a continuous barrier over the entire surface area\n27 [40 CFR 264.1085(c)]. This membrane has both organic permeability properties equivalent to a high-\n28 density polyethylene cover and chemical/physical properties that maintain the material integrity for the\n29 intended service life of the material. The additional requirements for the floating cover at the LERF have\n30 been met (Section C.5.2.4).\n31 C.7 Engineering Drawings\n32 C.7.1 Liquid Effluent Retention Facility\n33 Drawings of the containment systems at the LERF are summarized in Table C. 1. Because the failure of\n34 these containment systems at LERF could lead to the release of dangerous waste into the environment,\n35 modifications that affect these containment systems will be submitted to the Washington State\n36 Department of Ecology, as a Class 1, 2, or 3 Permit modification, as required by WAC 173-303-830.\n37 Table C.1. Liquid Effluent Retention Facility Containment System\nLERF System Drawing Number Drawing Title\nBottom Liner H-2-79590, Sheet I Civil Plan, Sections and Details; Cell Basin Bottom Liner\nTop Liner H-2-79591, Sheet 1 Civil Plan, Sections and Details; Cell Basin Bottom Liner\nCatch Basin H-2-79593, Sheet 1, 3-5 Civil Plan, Section and Details; Catch Basin\n38 The drawings identified in Table C.2 illustrate the piping and instrumentation configuration within LERF,\n39 and of the transfer piping systems between the LERF and the 242-A Evaporator. These drawings are\n40 provided for general information and to demonstrate the adequacy of the design of the LERF as a surface\n41 impoundment.\nAddendum C.46\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 Table C.2. Liquid Effluent Retention Facility Piping and Instrumentation\nLERF System Drawing Number Drawing Title\nTransfer Piping to H-2-79604, Sheet 1 Piping Plot and Key Plans; 242-A Evaporator\n242-A Evaporator Condensate Stream\nLERF Piping and H-2-88766, Sheet 1 P&ID; LERF Basin and ETF Influent\nInstrumentation H-2-88766, Sheet 2 P&ID; LERF Basin and ETF Influent\nH-2-88766, Sheet 3 P&ID; LERF Basin and ETF Influent\nH-2-88766, Sheet 4 P&ID; LERF Basin and ETF Influent\nLegend H-2-89351, Sheet 1 Piping & Instrumentation Diagram -Legend\n2 C.7.2 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility\n3 Drawings of the secondary containment systems for the 200 Area ETF containers, and tanks and process\n4 units, and for the Load-In Tanks are summarized in Table C.3. Because the failure of the secondary\n5 containment systems could lead to the release of dangerous waste into the environment, modifications,\n6 which affect the secondary containment systems, will be submitted to the Washington State Department\n7 of Ecology, as a Class 1, 2, or 3 Permit modification, as required by WAC 173-303-830.\n8 Table C.3. Effluent Treatment Facility and Load-In Station Secondary Containment\n9 Systems\n200 Area ETF Process Drawing Number Drawing Title\nUnit\nSurge Tank, Process/ H-2-89063, Sheet 1 Architectural/structural -Foundation and Grade\nContainer Storage Areas and Beam Plan\nTrenches -Foundation and\nContainment\nSump Tank Containment H-2-89065, Sheet 1 Architectural/structural -Foundation, Sections and\nDetail\nVerification Tank H-2-89068, Sheet I Architectural/structural -Verification Tank\nFoundation and Containment Foundation\nLoad-In Facility Foundation H-2-817970, Sheet 1 Structural -ETF Truck Load-in Facility Plans and\nand Containment Sections\nLoad-In Facility Foundation H-2-817970, Sheet 2 Structural -ETF Truck Load-in Facility Sections\nand Containment and Details\n10 The drawings identified in Table C.4 provide an illustration of the piping and instrumentation\n11 configuration for the major process units and tanks at the ETF, and the Load-In Tanks. Drawings of the\n12 transfer piping systems between the LERF and 200 Area ETF, and between the Load-In Station and the\n13 200 Area ETF also are presented in this table. These drawings are provided for general information and\n14 to demonstrate the adequacy of the design of the tank systems.\n15 Table C.4. Major Process Units and Tanks at the Effluent Treatment Facility and Load-In\n16 Station\nLoad-In Facility H-2-817974, Sheet 1 P&ID -ETF Truck Load-In Facility\nLoad-In Facility H-2-817974, Sheet 2 P&ID -ETF Truck Load-In Facility\nSurge Tank H-2-89337, Sheet 1 P&ID -Surge Tank System\nUV/Oxidation H-2-88976, Sheet 1 P&ID -UV Oxidizer Part 1\nAddendum C.47\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nUV/Oxidation H-2-89342, Sheet 1 P&ID -UV Oxidizer Part 2\nReverse Osmosis H-2-88980, Sheet 1 P&ID- 1st RO Stage\nReverse Osmosis H-2-88982, Sheet 1 P&ID -2nd RO Stage\nIX/Polishers H-2-88983, Sheet 1 P&ID -Polisher\nVerification Tanks H-2-88985, Sheet 1 P&ID -Verification Tank System\nETF Evaporator H-2-89335, Sheet 1 P&ID -Evaporator\nThin Film Dryer H-2-88989, Sheet 1 P&ID -Thin Film Dryer\nTransfer Piping from LERF to ETF H-2-88768, Sheet 1 Piping Plan/Profile 4\"- 60M-002-M17 and\n3\"-60M-001-MI7\nTransfer Piping from Load-In Facility to H-2-817969, Sheet 1 Civil -ETF Truck Load-In Facility Site\nETF Plan\nAddendum C.48\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nTable C.5. 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility Tank Systems Information\nLoad-in tanks 304 SS 34,350 3.6 4.7 0.64 Type 304 SS\n59A-TK-109/-117\n(2)\nLoad-in tank FRP 26,000 3.0 3.8 0.48 (dome) FRP\n59A-TK-1 0.63 (walls &\nbottom)\nSurge tank 304 SS 462,000 7.9 9.2 0.48 Type 304 SS\npH adjustment tank 304 SS 16,700 3.0 2.5 0.64 Type 304 SS\nFirst RO feed tank 304 SS 20,600 3.0 3.2 0.64 Type 304 SS\nSecond RO feed 304 SS 9,000 Nonround 1.5 0.48 w/rib Type 304 SS\ntank tank stiffeners\n3.0 mx\n1.5 m\nEffluent pH 304 SS 14,400 2.4 3.6 0.64 Type 304 SS\nadjustment tank\nVerification tanks Carbon steel 3,000,000 18.3 11.4 0.79 epoxy coating\n(3) with epoxy\nlining\nSecondary waste 304 SS 73,800 4.3 5.7 0.64 Type 304 SS\nreceiving tanks (2)\nConcentrate tanks 316L SS 24,900 3.0 3.8 0.64 Type 316 SS\n(2)\nETF evaporator Alloy 625 20,000 2.4 6.8 variable Alloy 625\n(Vapor Body)\nDistillate flash tank 304 SS 950 Horizontal Length 0.7 304 SS\ntank 0.76 2.2\nSump tank 1 304 SS 6,900 1.5 x 1.5 3.4 0.48 304 SS\nSump tank 2 304 SS 6,700 1.5 x 1.5 3.4 0.48 304 SS\n2 The maximum operating volume of the tanks is identified.\n3 2 The nominal thickness of ETF tanks is represented.\n4 Type 304 SS, 304L, 316 SS and alloy 625 provide corrosion protection.\n5 304 SS = stainless steel type 304 or 304L.\n6 316L SS = stainless steel type 316L\n7 FRP = Fiberglass-reinforced plastic.\n8\nAddendum C.49\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nTable C.6. 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility Additional Tank System Information\nLoad-in tanks None vent to concrete slab SS skirt bolted welded flanged\n59A-TK-109/-117 atmosphere to concrete\n(2)\nLoad-in tank None vent to concrete slab bolted to none flanged\n59A-TK-1 atmosphere concrete\nSurge tank None vacuum reinforced structural steel welded flanged\nbreaker concrete ring on concrete\nvalve/vent plus concrete base\nto VOG slab\npH adjustment tank None vent to VOG concrete slab carbon steel welded flanged\nskirt\nFirst RO feed tank None vent to VOG concrete slab carbon steel welded flanged\nskirt\nSecond RO feed None vent to VOG concrete slab carbon steel welded flanged\ntank frame\nEffluent pH None vent to VOG concrete slab carbon steel welded flanged\nadjustment tank skirt\nVerification tanks Epoxy filtered vent reinforced structural steel welded flanged\n(3) to concrete ring on concrete\natmosphere plus concrete base\nslab\nSecondary waste None vent to VOG concrete slab carbon steel welded flanged\nreceiving tanks (2) skirt\nConcentrate tanks None vent to VOG concrete slab carbon steel welded flanged\n(2) skirt\nETF evaporator None pressure concrete slab carbon steel welded flanged\n(vapor body) indicator/pre frame\nssure relief\nvalve vapor\nvent to\nDFT/VOG\nDistillate flash tank None Pressure concrete slab carbon steel I- welded flanged\nrelief - beam and\nvalve/vent cradle\nto vent gas\ncooler/VOG\nSump tank 1 None vent to VOG concrete reinforced welded flanged\ncontainment concrete\ncontainment\nbasin\nSump tank 2 None vent to VOG concrete reinforced welded flanged\ncontainment concrete\ncontainment\nbasin\n2 DFT = distillate flash tank\n3 VOG = vessel off gas system\n4\nAddendum C.50\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nTable C.7. Ancillary Equipment and Material Data\nLoad-in tanks Load-in/transfer pumps (2) 2025ED-P-103A/-103B 316SS\n2025ED-P-OO1A/-OO1B Cast iron\nLoad-in filters (6) 59A-FL-001/-002/- 304 SS\n003/ -004/-005/-006\nSurge tank Surge tank pumps (3) 2025E-60A-P-1A/-IB/-1C 304 SS\nRough filter Rough filter 2025E-60B-FL-1 304 SS\nUV/OX UV oxidation inlet cooler 2025E-60B-E-1 316SS\nUV oxidizers (4) 2025E-60D-UV-1A/-IB/- 316SS\n2A/-2B\npH adjustment pH adjustment pumps (2) 2025E-60C-P-lA/-lB 304SS\nPeroxide decomposer H202 decomposers (2) 2025E-60D-CO-lA/-IB CS with epoxy coating\nFine filter Fine filter 2025E-60B-FL-2 304 SS\nDegasification Degasification column inlet cooler 2025E-60E-E-1 316 SS\nDegasification column 2025E-60E-CO-1 FRP\nDegasification pumps (2) 2025E-60E-P-1A/-1B 316SS\nRO Feed/booster pumps (6) 2025E-60F-P-1A/-1B/-2A/- 304 SS\n2B/-3A/-3B\nReverse osmosis arrays (21) 2025E-60F-RO-01 through -Membranes: polyamide\n21 Outer piping: 304 SS\nIX/Polishers Polishers (3) 2025E-60G-IX-lA/-lB-1C CS with epoxy coating\nResins strainers (3) 2025E-60G-S-1A/-1B/-1C 304 SS\nEffluent pH adjustment Recirculation/transfer pumps (2) 2025E-60C-P-2A/-2B 304 SS/PVC\nVerification tanks Return pump 2025E-60H-P-1 304 SS\nTransfer pumps (2) 2025E-60H-P-2A/-2B\nSecondary waste receiving Secondary waste feed pumps (2) 2025E-601-P-1A/-IB 304 SS\ntanks\nETF evaporator system Feed/distillate heat exchanger 2025E-601-E-02 Tubes: 316 SS\nShell: 304 SS\nHeater (reboiler) 2025E-601-E-01 Tubes: alloy 625\nShell: 304 SS\nRecirculation pump 2025E-601-P-02 316SS\nConcentrate transfer pump 2025E-601-P-04 316 SS\nEntrainment separator 2025E-601-DE-01 Top section: 316 SS\nBottom section: alloy 625\nVapor compressor (incl. silencers) 2025E-601-C-01 304 SS\nSilencer drain pump 2025E-601-P-06 316SS\nLevel control tank 2025E-601-TK-5 304 SS\nDistillate flash tank pump 2025E-601-P-03 316 SS\nConcentrate tanks Concentrate circulation pumps (2) 2025E-60J-P-lA/-lB 316 SS\nThin film dryer Concentrate feed pump 2025E-60J-P-2 316SS\nThin film dryer 2025E-60J-D-1 Interior surfaces: alloy 625\nRotor and blades: 316 SS\nPowder hopper 2025E-60J-H-1 316SS\nSpray condenser 2025E-60J-DE-01 316SS\nDistillate condenser 2025E-60J-CND-01 Tubes: 304 SS\nShell: CS\nDryer distillate pump 2025E-60J-P-3 316SS\nResin dewatering Dewatering pump 2025E-80E-P-1\nAddendum C.51\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nTable C.8. Concrete and Masonary Coatings\nLocation Product Name Applied FilmThickness, Estimated\nETF Process and Container Storage Areas\nFloor: Topcoat Steelcote Floor-Nu Finish' 2 coats at 10-12 mils\nFloor: Primer Steelcote Monomid Hi-Build' 2.0 mils\nWalls to 7 feet, Doors & Jambs Chemproof PermaCoat 4000 Vertical2 2 coats at 12-16 mils\nLoad-in Station Tank Pit\nFloor and Walls Ameron Amercoat 3513 2 coats at 8.0-12 mils\nSurge Tank and Verification Tank Berms\nFloors (and Walls at Surge Tank): Topcoat KCC Corrosion Control Elasti-Liner J4 80 mils\nFloors (and Walls at Surge Tank): Primer KCC Corrosion Control Techni-Plus E34 5.0-7.0 mils\n2 'Floor-Nu Finish and Monomid Hi-Build are trademarks of Steelcote Manufacturing, Incorporated\n3 2PermaCoat is a trademark of Chemproof Polymers, Incorporated\n4 'Amercoat is a trademark of Ameron International, Incorporated\n5 4Elasti-Liner and Techni-Plus are trademarks of KCC Corrosion Control, Incorporated\n6 Table C.9. Geomembrane Material Specifications\nProperty Value\nSpecific gravity 0.932 to 0.950\nMelt flow index 1.0 g/10 min., maximum\nThickness (thickness of flow marks shall not exceed 200% of the nominal 60 mil 310%\nliner thickness) (1.5 mm 3 10%)\nCarbon black content 1.8 to 3%, bottom liner\n2 to 3% top liner\nTensile properties (each direction)\nTensile strength at yield 21.5 kgf/cm width, minimum\nTensile strength at break 32.2 kgf/cm width, minimum\nElongation at yield 10%, minimum\nElongation at break 500%, minimum\nTear resistance 13.6 kgf, minimum\nPuncture resistance 31.3 kgf, minimum\nLow temperature/brittleness -400 C, maximum\nDimensional (%change each direction) 32%, maximum\nEnvironmental stress crack 750 h, minimum\nWater absorption 0.1 maximum and weight change\nHydrostatic resistance 316,000 kgf/m2\nOxidation induction time (200 C/I atm. 02) 90 minutes\n7 Reference: Construction Specifications (KEH 1990b). Format uses NSF 54 table for high-density polyethylene as a\n8 guide (NSF 1985). However, RCRA values for dimensional stability and environmental stress crack have been\n9 added.\n10 % = percent max = maximum\n11 g = gram kgf = kilograms force\n12 min = minute m = meters\n13 h = hour mm = millimeters\n14\nAddendum C.52\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 Table C.10. Drainage Gravel Specifications\nProperty Value\nSieve size\n25 millimeters 100 wt% passing\n19 millimeters 80 -100 wt% passing\n9.5 millimeters 10 -40 wt% passing\n4.75 millimeters 0 -4 wt% passing\nPermeability 0.1 cm/sec, minimum\n2 Reference: Sieve size is from WSDOT M41-10-88, Section 9.03.1(3)C for Grading No. 5 (WSDOT 1988).\n3 Permeability requirement is from WAC 173-303-650(2)(j) for new surface impoundments.\n4\nAddendum C.53\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nFigure C.1. Liquid Effluent Retention Facility Layout\n000\nETF\n3\" & 4\"\nTransfer\nLines\n3\" Transfer RF\nLine\n242-A\nEvaporator\nETF = Effluent Treatment Facility\nLERF = Liquid Effluent Retention Facility M0704-3.5\n4-21-07\n2\nAddendum C.54\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nHydrogen\nVerification Peroxide Tank\nTank\nTruck Fild Container\nBay Storage Area Surge\nTank\nPROCESS AREA\nVerification Container\nTank Handling Room Primary\nHot Maintenance Acce O Cmical\nPipe Shop ShTrenches Offices\nPump HEPA/L eRoom Carbon\nVerificationFitr\nTank HVAC\nI StackLaboratory Maintenance\nArea Shops\nEvaporator Offices,Cooling Locker Rooms,Units Transformers Shops, etc.\nHEPA = High-efficiency particulate air\nHVAC = Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning M0704-3.6\n4.24-07\nFigure C.2. Plan View of the 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility\n2\n3\nAddendum C.55\n f lLPeroxide crpes,\nFeed TaCnk ompres\nFilled Container Storage Area 0 0\nTruc Bay Cyclone Sump Tank- .fSeparator SupTn TankNo. I\nDryer Boiler* Concentrate Tanks Secondary Waste Surge Tank\nr'ThnFi mCoDry er C aR eUving Ta a Evaporator 7r ~Rough 10 r =\nrom Pophers [R tIter Ser\nSo Container Filler A Podams\n0 Reeond ClaiTFed DgsiiainnHAjstetTn0 Hanling Container Res7n porator Pumpsou Conveyors Feed Tank_ RSa AgteTa Cln4ouRoom Hopper Concentrate Secondsrt Waste Xnlet CoolerH Boiler\n>Circulation Pumps R~~ akPmsUnit Biln\n0qo -O FrtR' Peroxide Decomposer Wall\nRO Feed Second Cleaning Feed Degasificationm Tan tOage Agent Feed Tank Column pH Adjuatment Tank\nAdjustment I ] \\LVU/OX Hydroxide 50% Sodium\n%Effluent pH Tk ROS Stm \"il\nu nTank R Stg i R O e gaamfication Ut AdTustment S rem\nReverse Osmosis System Degasification 4% Sulturic\nColumn Inlet Cooler Acid Tank\nAe Retume Pnmar\nA uPu m Ps m E P A H E P A t H oFi\"e II ~ Proes Concentrate\nFe Thn k FirH t Floor Laboratory p mt I Malnt eanceTanks Pump StgaFTnlPms lo ului\nSubterminaltStai rs\n-RoomColumn Inleted Coe AcezzTank\n011-1- Return-----------------Accesges toTHyroid U Xtra ltoxdto\nN Pu=or LocteHonPPezzaS D S ump Tnkr N FilCarbo liter Hotrtooiculater aecrica\nl~nit~t Uit B MailUnanOe Aealtrtruentattooxidationc\nshown in Italic tRoomo\nM0704-3.1 >\n4.21-07r101\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nFigure C.4. 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility\nVerification Tanks Additional\nContainer Storage\nI II\nTruck Bay\n> Loading-Are a\nProcessF-q ~Area L------ ----\nPaved Operations ContainerParking Support Storage Area\nArea Area HdoeHydrogenPeroxide\nTank\nSurge\nTank\nChemical\nStorage\nTanks Load-in\nFacility\nStation\nM0704-3.4\n4-21-07\n2\n3\nAddendum C.57\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nPrimary Treatment Train\nLL gon Rilugh UVIOX Deompe niter -Degas.\nLERF \n7\n1st Stage 2nd Stage Eff. Verification\nReverse Reverse IX pHOsmosis Osmosis Adj. Tanks\nOO0\nSWRT .... EVAP - C .. TFD O Drums\nSecondaryTreatment Train\nCONC Tank = Concentrate tank\nDegas. = Degasification column\nEff. pH Adj. = Effluent pH adjustment tank\nEVAP = Evaporator\nIX = Ion Exchange\nLERF = Liquid Effluent Retention Facility Mo74-.8\nH Adj. = pH adjustment tank\nWRT = Secondary waste receiving tank\nTFD = Thin film dryer\nUVIOX = Ultraviolet Oxidation\nFigure C.5. Example -200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility Configuration 1\nAddendum C.58\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nPrimary Treatment Train\nNote 1LERF\nSe1ondaryareatmentSTraiLERF Rough Filter Fine Filter eegasr ndcat S\nLERF\n----T Notel\nPeaH Peeroxicdeo columnifcato\nE eco Aj A nt adetmentTainCONC ank =Concntratatan\nEvap = Evaporator\nIX = Ion exchange\npH Ad. = pH adjustment tank\nWRT = Secondary waste receiving tank\nTFO = Thin film dryer\nUVOX = Ultraviolet Oxidation M004-3.2\n4-21-07\nFigure C.6. Example -200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility Configuration 2\n2\n3\nAddendum C.59\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nConfiguration #2 Configuration #1\nLERF2nd RO Permeate Load In-StationEvaporator Distillate PolisherThin Film Dryer Distillate Evaporator Distillate\nDryer Distillate\nSump #2\nResin Dewatering\nChemical Reagent\nFeed System\nSurge Tank\nHeater Eductor\nRecirculation Line\nTO: Rough\nFilter (Conf #1)\nor\nUV/OX (Conf #2)\nSurge Tank Pumps\nH97040165.19\nR1\nFigure C.7. Surge Tank\n2\n3\nAddendum C.60\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nRough Filter (Conf. #1)\nOr\nSurge Tank (Conf. #2)\nInlet Cooler\nUltraviolet Reaction Chamber 1A Reaction Chamber 1B\nLight/Oxidation M\nFlowlines \nsit\nDrain Lines\nReaction Chamber 2A Reaction Chamber 28\nDrain to\nL .J Sump Tank 2\npH Adjustment Tank\nH97040165.20\nFigure C.8. Ultraviolet Light/Oxidation Unit\n2\n3\nAddendum C.61\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nFigure C.9. Reverse Osmosis Unit\nFrom\nDeasification First SecondColumn Array Array\nBank A Bank A\nBank B Bank 8\n1st RO Feed Tank TO\nBank B3 Bank C SWRT\nTo let RO\nFSrd Tank\nSecond*\nFirst *Array\nArrayI\nBank A\n2nd RO Feed\nTank PumpsE;D\nBank A\nBankB0\nBank 8\nBank C\n2nd RO Fed Tank\nTo IX (Cont. #1) Bn\nor\nSurge Tank (Cont. #2)\nNote: *2 banks In operation, 1 bank in resere. H74151\nSWRT = Secondarty Waste Recieiving Tanks\n-= Retentate Line\n-= Permeate Line\n2\n3\nAddendum C.62\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nFrom:\n2nd RO Stage\nOr\nPeroxide Decomposer\nA ~ B\nResin Strainer Resin Strainer\nTo: Effluent pH\nAdjustment Tank\nNOTE: Example Configuration- Column A and B in Operation,\nColumn C In Standby Mode\nH97040165.18\nFigure C.10. Ion Exchange Unit\n2\n3\nAddendum C.63\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nFrom pH Adjustment Tank I\nHeater.-,\nR RecycleHeater e Lmes\nRecycleEductor\nLines\nH eater -i\n,, Eductor\nsa To ET F\nReturn Pump\nTransfer Pumps\nL.,2 To SALDS\nH97040165.17\nRI\n1 Figure C.11. Verification Tanks\n2\n3\nAddendum C.64\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nEntrainment\nSeparator\nVapor\nVapor Body Compressor\nVessel\nOff-Gas\nSystem\nHeater\nRecirculation LevelFrom Secondary Waste Pump Control ControlReceiving Tanks Tank Valve\nTo:\nConcentrate To:\nTanks Distillate\nFlash TankConcentrate\nTransfer Pump\nH497040165.10\nR2\nFigure C.12. Effluent Treatment Facility Evaporator\n2\n3\nAddendum C.65\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nFrom ETF Evaporator Concentrate Tanks\nFConcentrate\nTank Pumps\nBlower\ne Vessel Off-GasCoolerSystem\nMoto \"Cooling Water\nDryer/\nSteam\nfrom Boiler\nSpray Condenser\nDistillate\n. Cooler\nDryer/\nHopper Condensate\nReturn toy\nBoiler Distillate\nto Surge\nCooling Water Tank\n208-Liter Containers H97040165.16\nR1\nFigure C.13. Thin Film Dryer\n2\n3\nAddendum C.66\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n0a Cap ping (3) (12 Station\nO Filling -Filled from Dryer Hopper\nStAation (Thin Film Dryer)\n=E\nConveyor\nH97040165.1 5\nR1\n1 Figure C.14. Container Handling System\n2\n3\nAddendum C.67\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nTo Surge Tank\n-+To Secondary Waste\nReceiving Tanks\nExample of Waste to Sump Tank 1:\nSecondary treatment train waste,\nExcess water from resin dewatering,\nRecirculation line Pump Container wash water\nFloor Level\nSUMP TANK 1\nEductor\nTo Secondary Waste\nReceiving Tank B\nRecirculation line Example of Waste to Sump Tank 2:\nPump Primary treatment train waste,Shower drains\nFloor Level\nMISUMPTANK2\nEductor Hevenoiss.em\nFigure C.15. Effluent Treatment Facility Sump Tanks\n2\n3\nAddendum C.68\n SST BattenFloating Cover\nHOPE Cover Flap\nWelded to op Liner Revoc4echancally\nTi Tensioned\nTower System\nit Gasket Top and\nBottom of Liners\nSST Anchor -II\nBolts at 15 11\ncm Intervals U\n0 Anchor WallCDD\n0\nOL Floating ovr\nTop Liner (Geomembrane)\nBentonite Carpet Liner\nGeotxtil cmBackfill\nO Geonet\n30.5 cm --- 107 emn\nSide Slope OnlySoil/Bentonite46 )\nottom Liner (Geomembrane)\n91 cm\nBottom Only Drainage Gravel\nGeotextile\na = Patented and licensed by CW Neal Corp, Santee, CA H97040165A\nNot to Scale\n00\n.,I -\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nGeotextile\nBentonite Carpet Liner Geonet .4\nPrimary Primar 1.5 mm HDPE Geomembrane.\nComposite **-.-. *\nLiner..N\nDrainage Gravel (30.5 cm)Drainage\nLayerGeotextile\nSecondarymm-H-PE-G .emrn-brn\nSecondary SoiiiBentonhoe Mixture (91 cm; 107 cm on sides)\nComposite\nLiner\nNot to Scale H970401651\nFigure C.17. Liner System Schematic\n2\n3\nAddendum C.70\n Geonet\nDrainage Gravel Pipe Cover 2 Layers of Geonet\n10 in. Leachate Riser\n-ni (wrapped with geotextile)\n2.8M m 4-.61 m\n(20.\no oo c a oI notI C\no\n10 mm HDP 9 mx 004 mx 25 mmthc00\n> Geotextile0Grip Layer Mat\n09 spacedat20.3Hcm77.90m41.5 m HOPE2.9 mn x 0.46 mnx 25 mm thick\n0\n0\n0\n0\no Section View\na HDPE: High Density Polyethylene\nNot to Scale\nH§7040165.3\n13 0\n\"ri\n DOCUEu.NT ITE Oe.n.UWINilv ORGAlvlZATlIUNIFACLI lT.:\nGroundwater Monitoring Plan for the Liquid S&GRP\nEffluent Retention Facility\nDocument Number: DOE/RL-2013-46 Revision/Change Number: 0\nDOCUMENT TYPE (Check Applicable) [XI Plan [ ] Report [ ] Study [ ] Description Document [ ] Other\nDOCUMENT ACTION (Check One) [XI New [ I Revision [ Cancellation\nRESPONSIBLE CONTACTS\nName Phone Number\nAuthor: G. S. Thomas 509-373-3907\nManager: W. R. Faught 509-376-3139\nDOCUMENT CONTROL\nIs the document intended to be controlled within the Document Management Control System (DMCS)? [X] Yes [ ] No\nDoes document contain scientific and technical information intended for public use? [XI Yes [ ] No\nDoes document contain controlled-use information [ ] Yes [X] No\nDOCUMENT REVISION SUMMARY\nNOTE: Provide a brief description or summary of the changes for the document listed.\nInitial Release\nREVIEWERS Others\nName (print) Organization\nB. L. Cathel ESHR\nM. J. Hartman Groundwater Science\nF. A. Ruck III Technical Services\nJ. G. Douglas Sample Management\nAPPROVAL SIGNATUlREP:::\nRELEASE /ISSUE\n' Date\nName: (Print) IG. S. T'hbmas e*\nResponsible Manager: D :HNFORD\nte Nov 20, 2013 RELEASEName: (print) I W. R. Fa m via t\nOther:\nDate\nName: (print) R. W. Oldham via email 11/15/2013\nDate\nName: (print) S. L. Huggins via email 11/14/2013\nDate\nName: (print) R. C. Brunke via email 11/19/2013\nPage 1 of 4\nPage 1 of 1 A-6005-184 (REV 4)\n Flannery, Lori K\nFrom: Oldham, Richard W\nSent: Friday, November 15, 2013 6:51 AM\nTo: Flannery, Lori K\nSubject: Approve: DOE/RL-2013-46\nPage 2 of 4\n1\n Flannery, Lori K\nFrom: Huggins, Stewart L\nSent: Thursday, November 14, 2013 7:28 AM\nTo: Flannery, Lori K\nSubject: Approve: DOE/RL-2013-46\nPage 3 of 4\n1\n Flannery, Lori K\nFrom: Brunke, Ronald C\nSent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 2:32 PM\nTo: Flannery, Lori K\nSubject: Approve: DOE/RL-2013-46\nPage 4 of 4\n1\n Date Received for Clearance Process\n(MM/DDYYYY) INFORMATION CLEARANCE FORM\n11/20/2013\nA. Information Category B. Document Number DOE/RL-2013-4 6\nAbstract []Journal Article C. Title\nn Summary O] Internet Groundwater Monitoring Plan for the Liquid Effluent Retention\nn Visual Aid [] Software Facility\nFull Paper Report\n0I otherD. Proposed Internet\nAddress\nE. Required Information (MANDATORY) 7. Does Information Contain the Following:\n1. Is document potentially Cla d N 0 Yes a. New or Novel (Patentable) Subject Matter? No Q Yes\nWilliam R. Faug -yIf \"Yes\", OUO Exemption No. 3\nMana e ire (Prin nd n) If \"Yes\", Disclosure No.:\nb. Commercial Proprietary Information Received in Confidence, Such\nIf Yes as Proprietary and/or Inventions?\nADC Required (Print a No 0 Yes Classified @No Q Yes If 'Yes\", QUO Exemption No. 4\nc. Corporate Privileged Information? @ No O Yes\n2. Official Use Only @ No Q Yes Exemption No. If \"Yes\", OUO Exemption No. 4\n3. Export Controlled Information * No O Yes OUO Exemption No. 3 d. Government Privileged Information? ® No Q Yes\n4. I @ No YesIf \"Yes\", Exemption No. 5\ne. Copyrights? @ No Q Yes If \"Yes\", Attach Permission.\n5. Applied Technology No Q Yes OUO Exemption No. 5 f. Trademarks? ® No O Yes If \"Yes\", Identify in Document.\n6. Other (Specify) 8. Is Information requiring submission to OSTI? ® No O Yes\n9. Release Level? @ Public Q Limited\nF. Complete for a Journal Article\n1. Title of Journal\nG. Complete for a Presentation\n1. Title for Conference or Meeting\n2. Group Sponsoring\n3. Date of Conference 4. City/State\n5. Will Information be Published in Proceedings? Q No O Yes 6. Will Material be Handed Out? O No Q Yes\nH. Information Owner/Author/Requestor Responsible Manager\nG. S. Thomas W. R. Fa ht\n(Print and Sign) (Print and Sign\nApproval by Direct Report to President (Speech/Articles Only)\n(Print and Sign)\n1. Reviewers Yes Print Sign Public Y/N (If N, complete J)\nGeneral Counsel R. T. Swenson 0 0/19/2013 @ / N\nOffice of External Affairs Y / N\nDOE Y / N\nOther Y /N\nOther Y /N\nOther Y /N\nJ. Comments Information Clearance Approval\nApproved for Publik Release;\nFurther Dissemination Unlimited\nAPPROVED\nBy Shauna Adams at 2:09 pm, Nov 20, 2013\nIf Additional Comments, Please Attach Separate Sheet Page 1 of 2 A-6001-401 (REV 5)\n Flannery, Lori K\nFrom: Swenson, Raymond T\nSent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 9:24 AM\nTo: Flannery, Lori K\nSubject: Approve: DOE/RL-2013-46\n1\nPage 20of2\n DOE/RL-2013-46\nRevision 0\nGroundwater Monitoring Plan for the Liquid\nEffluent Retention Facility\nPrepared for the U.S. Department of Energy\nAssistant Secretary for Environmental Management\nContractor for the U.S. Department of Energy\nunder Contract DE-ACO6-08RL14788\nCH21VIHILL\nq k Plateau Remediation Company\nP.O. Box 1600\nRichland, Washington 99352\nApproved for Public Release;\nFurther Dissemination Unimited\n DOE/RL-2013-46\nRevision 0\nGroundwater Monitoring Plan for the Liquid Effluent Retention\nFacility\nDate Published\nNovember 2013\nPrepared for the U.S. Department of Energy\nAssistant Secretary for Environmental Management\nContractor for the U.S. Department of Energy\nunder Contract DE-ACO6-08RL14788\nCH421VIHILL\n4b Plateau Remediation Company\nP.O. Box 1600\nRichland, Washington 99352\nAPPROVED\nBy Shauna Adams at 2:10 pm, Nov 20, 2013\nRelease Approval Date\nApproved for Public Release;\nFurther Dissemination Unlihnked\n DOE/RL-2013-46\nRevision 0\nTRADEMARK DISCLAIMER\nReference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by\ntradename, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily\nconstitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the\nUnited States Government or any agency thereof or its contractors or\nsubcontractors.\nThis report has been reproduced from the best available copy.\nPrinted in the United States of America\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 Addendum D\n2 Groundwater Monitoring Plan\n3\nD-i\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART Ill, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1\n2 This page intentionally left blank.\n3\nD-ii\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 Contents\n2 D Groundwater Monitoring Plan, Liquid Effluent Retention Facility ........................................ D-1\n3 Dl Introduction ..................................................... D-1\n4 D1.1 History of Groundwater Monitoring at the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility.........D-1\n5 D1.2 Facility Description....................................... .....D-2\n6 Dl.3 Physical Structure ............................................ D-2\n7 D1.4 Operational History....................................... .....D-2\n8 DI.5 Waste Characteristics ......................................... D-3\n9 D1.6 Basin 42 ............................................. .....D-3\n10 D.7 Basin 43 .......................................... ........ D-4\n11 D1.8 Basin 44 .......................................... ........ D-5\n12 D1.9 Potential Contaminate Indicator Parameters in Groundwater.......... .....D-6\n13 D2 Hydrogeology and Groundwater-Chemistry .................................... D-6\n14 D2.1 Geology .......................................... ........ D-6\n15 D2.2 Groundwater Hydrology ............................................ D-10\n16 D2.3 Groundwater Chemistry .................................. .....D-14\n17 D2.4 Well Completions and Conditions ................................ D-15\n18 D3 Groundwater-Monitoring Program...........................................D-16\n19 D3.1 Objectives of Dangerous Waste Groundwater Monitoring and Past Monitoring\n20 Results................. ........................ ....... D-17\n21 D3.2 Dangerous Constituents .................................. .....D-17\n22 D3.3 Concentration Limits .............................................. D-17\n23 D3.4 Groundwater Monitoring System and Point of Compliance ......... ........D-18\n24 D3.5 Compliance Period..........................................D-18\n25 D3.6 Sampling and Analysis ......................................... D-18\n26 D3.7 Decontamination of Drilling and Sampling Equipment............. .....D-20\n27 D3.8 Quality Objectives and Criteria...... ...................... D-20\n28 D3.9 Analytical Procedures ................................................. D-20\n29 D3.10 Reporting and Recordkeeping...................................D-24\n30 D3.11 Evaluation and Notification ..................................... D-24\n31 D4 Compliance-Monitoring Program .............................................. D-25\n32 D5 Corrective-Action Program .................................... ......D-25\n33 D6 References ..................................................... D-25\n34\n35\nD-iii\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 Figures\n2 Figure D-1. LERF Location Map................D-............ .............. D44\n3 Figure D-2. LERF Well and Facility Description Map...............................D-45\n4 Figure D-3. LERF Location Map Showing Revised Unconfined Aquifer Thickness Based on\n5 Geophysical and Previous Borehole Data.........................D-47\n6 Figure D-4. Comparison of Sulfate at Wells 299-E34-7, 299-E26-14, and 299-E26-10 .... .....D-49\n7 Figure D-5. History of Total Organic Carbon and Nitrate at Well 299-E34-7 ........... .....D-49\n8 Figure D-6. Comparison of Carbon Tetrachloride to Total Organic Halides ............ .....D-50\n9 Figure D-7. Comparison of Carbon Tetrachloride to Total Organic Carbon............ .....D-50\n10 Figure D-8. Seismic Profile North of LERF extending from Well 299-E35-2 to Well 299-E26-11\n11 and Including Well 299-E26-11 ................................. .....D-51\n12 Figure D-9. Conceptual Model of Buried Paleochannels Extending Through Gable Gap .................. D-53\n13 Figure D-10. Seismic Profile South of LERF with Focus on Area between Wells 299-E26-10\n14 and 299-E26-11 ...................................................... D-55\n15 Figure D- 11. Three Dimensional View from East of LERF Looking West-Northwest into the Soil\n16 Column ...................................................... D-57\n17 Figure D-12. Three Dimensional View from East of LERF Looking West-Northwest into the Soil\n18 Column ...................................................... D-58\n19 Figure D-13. West to East Geologic Cross Section Just North of LERF ............... .....D-59\n20 Figure D-14. West to East Geologic Cross Section Just South of LER .................... D-60\n21 Figure D-15. AQTESOLV Moench Unconfined Aquifer Pumping/Recovery Test for Type-Curve\n22 Match to Well 299-E26-14 with Wellbore Skin Affects and Delayed\n23 Gravity Response .......................................... .....D-61\n24 Figure D-16. AQTESOLV Neuman Unconfined Aquifer Pumping/Recovery Test for Type-Curve\n25 Match to Well 299-E26-14 with Delayed Gravity Response ...................... D-62\n26 Figure D-17. AQTESOLV Springer-Gelhar Critically Dampened Type-Curve Match to\n27 Well 299-E26-77 Second Slug Withdraw Test November 18, 2008 ............. D-63\n28 Figure D-18. Comparison of Sulfate Concentration Results in Wells 299-E26-10, 299-E26-14,\n29 and 299-E26-79 ........................................... .....D-64\n30 Figure D-19. History of Sulfate Increases in Wells 299-E26-10, 299-E26-77, and 299-E34-7.............D-64\n31 Figure D-20. 2008 and 2013 Regional Sulfate Plume ........................... .....D-65\n32 Figure D-21. Comparison of Sulfate Increases in Wells 299-E26-10, 299-E26-1 1, and 299-E34-7 ....D-66\n33 Figure D-22. Historical View of Changing Groundwater Conditions Beneath the Vicinity of LERF...D-67\n34 Figure D-23. Well Construction Diagram for Well 299-E26-10 in LERF Groundwater Monitoring\n35 Network ..................................................... D-69\n36 Figure D-24. Well Construction Diagram for Well 299-E26-11 in the Past LERF Groundwater\n37 Monitoring Network ....................................... ......D-70\n38 Figure D-25. Well Construction Diagram for Well 299-E26-14 in LERF Groundwater Monitoring\n39 Network ..................................................... D-71\n40 Figure D-25. Well Summary Sheet for Well 299-E26-14 in the LERF Groundwater Monitoring\n41 Network (Cont.) .................................... .................... D-72\nD-iv\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART Ill, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 Figure D-26. Well Summary Sheet for Well 299-E26-77 in LERF Groundwater Monitoring\n2 Network ..................................................... D-73\n3 Figure D-26. Well Summary Sheet for Well 299-E26-77 in LERF Groundwater Monitoring\n4 Network (Cont.) .............................................. D-74\n5 Figure D-27. Well Summary Sheet for Well 299-E26-79 in LERF Groundwater Monitoring\n6 Network ..................................................... D-74\n7 Figure D-27. Well Summary Sheet for Well 299-E26-79 in LERF Groundwater Monitoring\n8 Network (Cont.) ....................................... .............. D-75\n9 Figure D-28. Proposed LERF Well and Facility Description Map .................... .....D-77\n10 Tables\n11 Table D-1. Constituent Results for 242-A Process Condensate Characterization Results and Basin\n12 42 Characterization Results ................ .................. .....D-29\n13 Table D-2. Basin 43 Constituent Characterization Results for Past 200-UP-1 and 200-ZP-1\n14 Groundwater Waste Streams and Recent Waste Characterization Results For Basin 43.D-33\n15 Table D-3. ERDF Leachate ................................................ D-35\n16 Table D-4. LERF Well Attributes ................................................. D-37\n17 Table D-5. LERF Groundwater Gradient and Magnitude Calculations......................D-38\n18 Table D-6. Geochemical Constituent Evaluation for Groundwater ........................ D-39\n19 Table D-7. Dangerous Constituents and Indicators to be Analyzed as Indicators of Groundwater\n20 Contamination at the LERF Basins ................................... D-39\n21 Table D-8. Quality Control Samples.......................................D-39\n22 Table D-9. Preservation Techniques, Analytical Methods Used, and Current Required\n23 Quantitation Limits for Chemical Constituents ....................... .....D-40\n24 Table D-10. Field and Laboratory Quality Control Elements and Acceptance Criteria.......................D-41\n25 Table D- 11. Blind-Standard Constituents and Schedule..................... .........D-43\n26\nD-v\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nTerms\nbgs below ground surface\nCr(VI) hexavalent chromium\nCRDL contract-required detection limit\nDQO data quality objective\nEB equipment blank\nEcology Washington State Department of Ecology\nEMB Elephant Mountain Member of the Saddle Mountains Basalt\nERDF Environmental Restoration Disposal Facility\nETF Effluent Treatment Facility\nFTB full trip blank\nFXR field transfer blank\nGC gas chromatography\nHDPE high-density polyethylene\nICP inductively coupled plasma\nHEIS Hanford Environmental Information System\nKGS Kansas Geological Survey\nLCS laboratory control sample\nLERF Liquid Effluent Retention Facility\nMDL method detection limit\nMS matrix spike\nMSD matrix spike duplicate\nNA not applicable\nOU operable unit\nQC quality control\nRCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976\nRPD relative percent difference\nTBD to be determined\nTOC total organic carbon\nTOX total organic halides\nUPR unplanned release\nXRF X-ray fluorescence\nD-vi\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 D Groundwater Monitoring Plan, Liquid Effluent Retention Facility\n2 This document describes a groundwater monitoring program for the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility\n3 (LERF) (Figure D-1). LERF is a regulated unit under RCW 70.105, \"Hazardous Waste Management,\"\n4 and is subject to groundwater monitoring requirements pursuant to WAC 173-303-645, \"Dangerous\n5 Waste Regulations,\" \"Releases from Regulated Units.\"\n6 D1 Introduction\n7 This plan describes the LERF groundwater monitoring program, including the monitoring network,\n8 constituent list, sampling schedule, sampling and analysis protocols, and data evaluation and reporting\n9 methods for LERF groundwater monitoring. Four monitoring wells at LERF (299-E26-10, 299-E26-14,\n10 299-E26-77, and 299-E26-79) provide a monitoring network for establishing the groundwater gradient,\n11 and two monitoring wells (299-E26-14 and 299-E26-79) provide upgradient-downgradient comparisons\n12 for detection monitoring, respectively (Figure D-2).\n13 D1.1 History of Groundwater Monitoring at the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility\n14 A four-well groundwater monitoring program was established at LERF in 1990 before final construction\n15 of the regulated unit. One well (299-E26-1 1) was completed to the east of LERF as an upgradient\n16 monitoring well, and three wells (299-E26-9, 299-E26-10, and 299-E35-2) were completed west of LERF\n17 as downgradient monitoring wells. Well 299-E26-77, a replacement well for well 299-E26-9, was located\n18 approximately 5 m (15 ft) to the southeast of well 299-E26-9 and because of the scale for Figure D-2,\n19 only well 299-E26-77 is identified. Samples were collected quarterly from the four monitoring wells, and\n20 evaluation of indicator parameters began before waste was transferred to the basins. Analytes listed in\n21 Appendix III, \"EPA Interim Primary Drinking Water Standards,\" of 40 CFR 265, \"Interim Status\n22 Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities,\"\n23 Subpart F, \"Ground-Water Monitoring,\" were sampled to establish the suitability of the groundwater as a\n24 drinking water supply, as well as several other site-specific constituents the first year of sample\n25 collection. Total organic carbon (TOC), total organic halides (TOX), pH, and specific conductivity\n26 (indicator parameters) also were analyzed during the first year to derive upgradient/downgradient\n27 comparison values for these parameters based on requirements of 40 CFR 265, Subpart F. Detection\n28 monitoring continued on a semiannual schedule. Two wells, 299-E26-9 and 299-E35-2, could no longer\n29 yield representative samples of groundwater in 1999 and 2001, respectively, due to declining water levels.\n30 As a result, inter-well statistical evaluation of LERF groundwater monitoring data has not been performed\n31 since 2001. Sampling continued at former downgradient well 299-E26-10 and former upgradient well\n32 299-E26-1 1. Wells 299-E26-77 and 299-E26-79 were drilled and completed in 2008 to define the aquifer\n33 flow rate, flow direction, and hydrogeologic conditions (SGW-41072, Liquid Effluent Retention Facility\n34 Characterization Report) (Figure D-2). These wells are located west and south of LERF, respectively,\n35 and were sampled concurrently with existing wells beginning in January 2009. Water level\n36 measurements, after incorporation of the two new wells, demonstrated two different flow conditions,\n37 westerly when incorporating well 299-E26-11 and more southerly when data for well 299-E26-11 are not\n38 incorporated (SGW-41072). Because of the uncertainty in flow direction, another well, 299-E26-14, was\n39 installed north of LERF to clarify current groundwater flow direction. A geophysical investigation was\n40 employed to target the best hydraulic location for well 299-E26-14 as discussed further in Section D2. 1.1\n41 (Figure D-3). In September 2011, well 299-E26-14 was installed. After two years of water level\n42 measurements using well 299-E26-14 and the three other wells (299-E26-10, 299-E26-77, and\n43 299-E26-79), the flow direction was considered southward (discussed further in Section 2.2.2). Various\n44 chemical analyses were completed over the past two years to provide an upgradient baseline for\n45 dangerous waste constituents specified in this permit.\nD-1\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 D1.2 Facility Description\n2 The following subsections provide an overview of the physical structures, operational history, and waste\n3 characteristics of LERF. Additional details are provided in Addendum B (Waste Analysis Plan) and\n4 Addendum C (Process Information).\n5 D1.3 Physical Structure\n6 LERF is located in the central portion of the Hanford Site on the eastern boundary of the 200 East Area\n7 (Figure D-1). Construction of LERF was completed in 1991. The LERF basins consist of three dangerous\n8 waste management units classified as surface impoundments: Basins 42, 43, and 44 (Figure D-2).\n9 The LERF design uses a dual confinement barrier concept (i.e., dual basin liners and pipe-in-a-pipe\n10 transfer piping system) to minimize human exposure and potential for accidental releases to the\n11 environment. A leachate detection, collection, and removal system and basin covers are designed to\n12 reduce possible environmental or personnel exposures. The leachate detection system is monitored, as\n13 required, by the LERF-Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF) permit conditions and Addendum I.\n14 LERF is a 15.8 ha (39 ac) site with three 2.9 x 107 L (7.8 million gal) capacity basins (Figure D-2).\n15 The basins are arranged side by side with 18.2 m (60 ft) separations between each basin. The dimensions\n16 of each basin (cell) are 100.5 by 82.2 m (330 by 270 ft), with a maximum fluid depth of 6.7 m (22 ft).\n17 The side slopes of the basin have a slope ratio of 3:1.\n18 The primary liner for each basin is a 60 mil, high-density polyethylene (HDPE) geomembrane laid\n19 directly over a manufactured geotextile/bentonite carpet layer. The secondary liner is also a 60 mil HDPE\n20 geomembrane laid directly on 0.9 m (36 in.) of a soil/bentonite mixture. The liners are separated by a\n21 synthetic drainage geonet laid on the sides of the basins, with 0.3 m (12 in.) of drainage gravel at the\n22 bottom. The sides slope to a sump, which is pumped when the liquid level reaches approximately 28 cm\n23 (11 in.) and shuts off when it drops to 18 cm (7 in.). Each basin has a mechanically tensioned cover of\n24 very low density polyethylene construction, which is anchored to the perimeter concrete ring wall of the\n25 basins with batten plates.\n26 D1.4 Operational History\n27 LERF was constructed for interim storage and treatment for aqueous waste streams prior to final\n28 treatment in the 200 Area ETF. Treatment at LERF consists of flow and pH equalization. The flow\n29 equalization allows for several smaller waste streams that are intermittently received at the LERF basins\n30 to accumulate for continuous higher volume campaign processing at ETF. The pH equalization allows for\n31 a uniform wastewater to optimize ETF process campaigns.\n32 LERF began receiving process condensate from the 242-A Evaporator in 1994. In 1995, several new\n33 liquid waste feeds were identified for treatment at LERF. These waste streams included Environmental\n34 Restoration Disposal Facility (ERDF) leachate, purge water from groundwater monitoring, B Plant waste,\n35 and 200-UP-1 groundwater remediation. Between 2000 and 2013, the majority of the liquid waste\n36 received at LERF was associated with the following in descending order: 200-UP-1/200-ZP-1\n37 groundwater (181.4 million gal), ERDF leachate (16 million gal), process condensate from the 242-A\n38 Evaporator (7.3 million gal), Mixed Waste Burial Trenches leachate (2.9 million gal), K Basins\n39 (1.9 million gal), and purge water (1.8 million gal).\n40 Projected ETF influent waste streams for 2010 through 2028 are presented in HNF-23142, Engineering\n41 Study for the 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility Secondary Waste Treatment of Projected Future\n42 Waste Feeds.\nD-2\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 D1.5 Waste Characteristics\n2 As a unit of LERF, the 200 Area ETF was designed to treat a variety of aqueous wastes containing both\n3 chemical and radiological contaminants. This aqueous waste is collected in the three LERF basins before\n4 transfer to ETF for efficient operations. Before a liquid waste can be transferred to ETF or LERF by a\n5 waste generator, a waste profile of the subject waste must be developed. This waste profile is compared\n6 against the ETF/LERF acceptance criteria, as explained in Addendum B, \"Waste Analysis Plan.\"\n7 Waste streams that have been approved are also periodically re-evaluated for waste characteristics.\n8 The results of these periodic re-evaluations (provided in this subsection) help identify reliable chemical\n9 contaminants that can be used as or for additional indicator parameters for detection monitoring\n10 (as described in WAC 173-303-645(9)(a)). Waste characteristics for liquid effluents that have been\n11 historically stored in the three LERF basins (Basins 42, 43, and 44) are provided in the following\n12 subsections.\n13 D1.6 Basin 42\n14 Various aqueous waste streams feed Basin 42; however, the 242-A Evaporator waste stream has been the\n15 largest volume waste stream associated with Basin 42. Over the past 13 years (1999 through 2012),\n16 the liquid volume associated with the 242-A Evaporator waste was 10 times that of any other waste\n17 streams sent to Basin 42. Maximum concentration limits for the 242-A Evaporator waste stream during\n18 initial startup were provided in WHC-SD-W105-SAR-001, Final Safety Analysis Report 242-A\n19 Evaporator Liquid Effluent Retention Facility. When the maximum concentrations for the 242-A\n20 Evaporator waste stream (Table 9.6 of WHC-SD-W105-SAR-001) were compared with the average\n21 contaminant concentration levels (2009 through 2010 weighted average liquid concentrations) in Basin 42\n22 (Table D-1), nearly all of the average Basin 42 concentrations were lower. Constituents with greater\n23 concentrations were limited to two anions (chloride and sulfate), one cation (calcium), and four trace\n24 metals (barium, manganese, uranium, and zinc). These constituents appear to be associated with other\n25 waste streams such as the Mixed Waste Trenches 31 and 34 leachate and Hanford Site purge water which\n26 had the second and third largest waste streams by volume. The other 17 waste streams associated with\n27 Basin 42 make up approximately 2 percent of the volume.\n28 The makeup of Basin 42 is similar to the groundwater wells upgradient of the Hanford Site or regional\n29 background groundwater concentrations, except for alkalinity, nitrogen, and sulfate. A comparison\n30 between Basin 42 wastewater and upgradient Hanford Site wells can be seen in the appropriate Table D-1\n31 columns (e.g., 2009 Basin 42 Characterization Results and Basin 42 Average versus Regional\n32 Background Concentration of Table D-1). In general, regional groundwater background concentrations\n33 are similar to groundwater concentrations beneath LERF, except for anions. Although Basin 42 and\n34 groundwater beneath Basin 42 share a common suite of elevated constituents (anions), the source of the\n35 elevated anions in the groundwater is from a crossgradient/upgradient groundwater location.\n36 The crossgradient/upgradient groundwater location is shown by historical groundwater results at well\n37 299-E34-7 prior to the start of LERF and more recently at the LERF upgradient well 299-E27-14\n38 (Figure D-4). By comparison, the average concentrationi of sulfate in Basin 42 (55.6 mg/L) is much less\n39 than the historical sulfate concentration at well 299-E34-7 of 671 mg/L (sample date 4/3/2003).\n40 Even characterization results from Basins 42, 43, and 44 (Tables D-1, D-2, and D-3) do not compare with\n41 the maximum groundwater results at well 299-E34-7. The same is true for nitrate in Basin 42 as compared\n42 with nitrate at the crossgradient/upgradient well 299-E34-7. Only the contributions of the 200-BP-5\n43 perched water waste streams from Basin 43 and ERDF leachate exceed the groundwater results at well\n44 299-E34-7. However, because of the nature of the elevated groundwater results at well 299-E34-7,\n45 including elevated TOC, and the relationship to past unplanned releases (UPRs) near well 299-E34-7\n1 All concentrations are reported as a weighted average.\nD-3\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 (e.g., UPR-200-E-32 associated with the 216-B-2-1 Ditch and UPR-200-E-138 associated with the\n2 216-B-2-2 Ditch [Figure D-1]), the elevated groundwater results at well 299-E34-7 appear to be from a\n3 source other than LERF (Figure D-5). The UPRs (e.g., UPR-200-E-32 and UPR-200-E-138) were\n4 associated with B Plant fractionation waste that had significant levels of nitrate, sulfate, and organic\n5 carbon. The nature of these UPRs appears more characteristic of the levels reported at well 299-E34-7.\n6 Well 299-E26-10, located to the west of LERF, appears to mimic the historical results at well 299-E34-7\n7 (Figure D-4). As the nitrate and sulfate concentrations decrease over time, if concentrations follow the\n8 earlier trends at well 299-E34-7, these constituents may become more appropriate as indicator parameters\n9 at LERF. However, the concentration of these constituents in LERF Basins would not be distinguishable\n10 from current groundwater conditions beneath LERF. Because nitrate and sulfate may become more\n11 appropriate indicator parameters in the future, they will serve currently as groundwater quality parameters\n12 at the LERF monitoring wells. Because specific conductance is an indicator of nitrate and sulfate changes,\n13 specific conductance will be added as an indicator parameter for documentation of local changes and\n14 comparison between the upgradient and downgradient monitoring wells.\n15 None of the toxicity characteristic of dangerous waste constituents received by Basin 42 exceed toxicity\n16 characteristics list threshold values (WAC 173-303-090(8)(c), \"Dangerous Waste Regulations,\"\n17 \"Dangerous Waste Characteristics\"). Six of the potentially dangerous waste metal constituent results in\n18 the basin were above groundwater background levels (Table D-1): chromium, copper, lead, mercury,\n19 nickel, and thallium. Although the results are above the groundwater background levels, the results would\n20 not be detectable at groundwater compliance points should there be a potential release into the upper\n21 aquifer because of the low waste stream concentrations and dispersive effect associated with infiltrating\n22 waste into the groundwater.\n23 There were low levels of organics found in Basin 42 with 1-butanol (288 jtg/L) having the highest\n24 weighted average. The chemical nature of 1-butanol (e.g., rapidly degrades in water and has a relatively\n25 high detection level 100 gg/L) makes this constituent an unlikely indicator parameter.\n26 In conclusion, no reliable waste constituent indicator parameters are presently available for Basin 42\n27 groundwater detection.\n28 D1.7 Basin 43\n29 The largest volume of waste waters received by Basin 43 was the contaminated groundwater from the\n30 200-UP-1/200-ZP-1 operable units (OUs) groundwater pumping systems (Table D-2).\n31 The 200-UP-1/200-ZP-1 OUs waste stream had 20 times more volume sent to LERF than the next closest\n32 waste stream (ERDF leachate) over the past decade and a half. The 200-UP-1/200-ZP-1 OUs groundwater\n33 effluent waste characteristics are contained in Table D-2. Tables D-2 and D-3 provides characteristics of\n34 the ERDF leachate. Table D-2 provides characteristics of ERDF leachate in Basin 43 in 2012 after receipt\n35 of the 200-UP-1/200-ZP-1 OUs groundwater effluent waste was terminated, and Table D-3 provides the\n36 average ERDF leachate characterization results for Basin 44 from 2000 through September 2011. Overall,\n37 the waste characteristics in Basin 43 are most comparable to the waste streams from 200-UP-1/200-ZP- 1\n38 OUs groundwater pumping systems because of its significant volume compared with the other waste\n39 streams.\n40 The 200-UP-1/200-ZP-1 OUs waste streams have a makeup similar to the groundwater well results near\n41 sources of B Plant liquid effluent disposal sites. These sites received and disposed of metal waste,\n42 uranium recovery waste, and cesium and strontium scavenging waste which have infiltrated into the\n43 aquifer. The highest ionic results are associated with nitrogen. The Basin 43 weighted average\n44 concentration was 101 mg/L (nitrogen in nitrate) compared to 10 mg/L in the groundwater beneath LERF.\n45 Some of the other waste streams (e.g., ERDF leachate and 200-BP-5 perched water) received at Basin 43\nD-4\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 also exceeded regional background groundwater results for chloride, nitrogen, and sulfate, with\n2 concentrations as great as 224 mg/L, 220 mg/L, and 597 mg/L, respectively (Table D-2). However, these\n3 constituents are not likely to be distinguishable from current groundwater conditions beneath LERF,\n4 mainly because of the concentration of these constituents in the groundwater at crossgradient/upgradient\n5 locations to LERF, as discussed in Section D1.5.1. As also discussed in Section D1.5.1, as the\n6 groundwater concentrations from the crossgradient/upgradient direction decrease, these constituents may\n7 become more appropriate as indicator parameters at LERF. Because nitrate and sulfate may become more\n8 appropriate indicator parameters in time, they will serve currently as groundwater quality parameters at\n9 LERF monitoring wells. Because specific conductance is an indicator of nitrate and sulfate changes,\n10 specific conductance will be added as an indicator parameter for documentation of the expected local\n11 changes and comparison between the upgradient and downgradient monitoring wells.\n12 None of the toxicity characteristic dangerous waste constituents received by Basin 43 exceed the toxicity\n13 characteristics list threshold values (WAC 173-303-090(8)(c)). However, several of the potentially\n14 dangerous waste metal constituent results for the basin were above groundwater background levels.\n15 Even so, the results appear too low to determine should a potential release reach the aquifer because of\n16 the scattering effect associated with infiltrating liquid waste effluents through the vadose zone into the\n17 groundwater. However, it may be possible to differentiate hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)).\n18 This constituent will need to be monitored semiannually for two years to develop a local background\n19 basis before potentially adding it as an indicator parameter. Total chromium is not a reliable indicator\n20 parameter because of the potential concentrations associated with casing corrosion.\n21 Of the 49 volatile and semivolatile constituents, analyzed at various frequencies from 2008 to 2011 for\n22 liquid wastes sent to Basin 43, only 3 (carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, and trichloroethene) were\n23 detectable. The most significant constituent was carbon tetrachloride, with concentrations ranging\n24 between 190 and 800 gg/L. The other two constituents had concentrations less than 10 gg/L. Since carbon\n25 tetrachloride is not normally occurring in the groundwater, it should be an excellent indicator parameter.\n26 TOC ranged between 0.3 and 2.45 mg/L for liquid waste in Basin 43. The concentrations do not appear to\n27 be significant enough to differentiate a groundwater quality impact should a release occur. TOC analyses\n28 are subject to a wide range of variability and can lead to a false positive error. A more valid indicator of\n29 carbon tetrachloride is TOX (Figures D-6 and D-7). Although not analyzed for in Table D-2, this\n30 indicator parameter has a lower level of detection than TOC, and, as shown in Figures D-6 and D-7,\n31 mimics the carbon tetrachloride level better than TOC. Thus, detection of both indicators (carbon\n32 tetrachloride and TOX) would be conclusive of a dangerous waste constituent impact. As a result, TOX\n33 and carbon tetrachloride will be added as indicator parameters for the LERF monitoring network.\n34 D1.8 Basin 44\n35 Basin 44 has received liquid waste dominated by ERDF leachate (7 million gal or 60 percent by volume).\n36 Other liquid waste streams include K Basin waste (1.9 million gal or 16 percent by volume), leachate\n37 from double-lined burial trenches, Mixed Waste Trenches 31 and 34 located in the 218-W-5 Burial\n38 Ground (1.2 million gal or 10 percent by volume), and purge water from well development (1.1 million\n39 gal or 10 percent by volume). The purge water and Mixed Waste Trenches 31 and 34 waste streams are\n40 lower in all constituents as compared with ERDF leachate. Therefore, waste in Basin 44 is most similar to\n41 the ERDF leachate because of volume and concentration.\n42 ERDF waste streams are similar to groundwater well results downgradient from B Plant liquid effluent\n43 disposal sites. The most comparable results are associated with chloride, nitrate, and sulfate. The average\n44 concentrations were 250 mg/L, 327 mg/L, and 474 mg/L, respectively (Table D-3). However, these\n45 constituents are not likely to be distinguishable from current groundwater conditions beneath LERF,\n46 mainly because the concentration of these constituents are already present in the groundwater at similar\nD-5\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 concentrations both crossgradient and upgradient of LERF, as discussed in Section D1.5.1. As also\n2 discussed in Section DI .5.1, as the groundwater concentrations from the crossgradient/upgradient\n3 direction decrease, these constituents may become more appropriate as indicator parameters at LERF.\n4 Because nitrate and sulfate may become more appropriate indicator parameters in time they will serve\n5 currently as groundwater quality parameters at the LERF monitoring wells. Because specific conductance\n6 is an indicator of nitrate and sulfate changes, specific conductance will be added as an indicator parameter\n7 for documentation of the expected local changes and comparison between the upgradient and\n8 downgradient monitoring wells.\n9 None of the toxicity characteristic dangerous waste constituents received by LERF exceed the toxicity\n10 characteristics list threshold values (WAC 173-303-090(8)(c)). Several of the potentially dangerous waste\n11 metal constituents received at LERF were above groundwater background levels (Table D-3).\n12 Nevertheless, the results would not show a measurable difference should a potential release to the aquifer\n13 occur because of the low waste stream concentrations and the scattering effect associated with infiltrating\n14 of liquid waste effluents through the vadose zone into the groundwater.\n15 The organic chemical analytical results associated with Basin 44 were at very low levels (<5 jtg/L) and\n16 were only periodically detected. Therefore, the ability to detect a potential release in the aquifer for\n17 organic chemicals is not practicable for the same reason as discussed for the metals and anions.\n18 TOC averaged 13.2 mg/L in Basin 44. TOC concentrations seem to be correlated with the elevated oil and\n19 grease results. Because oil and grease are viscous, TOC does not appear to be a good indicator parameter.\n20 The concentrations do not appear significant enough to be detectable in groundwater should a release\n21 occur. As noted previously, TOC analyses are subject to a wide range of variability and can potentially\n22 lead to a false positive error.\n23 In conclusion, no reliable waste constituent indicator parameters are presently available for Basin 44\n24 groundwater detection.\n25 D1.9 Potential Contaminate Indicator Parameters in Groundwater\n26 Based on the projected LERF influent waste streams and concentration levels from 2010 through 2028 as\n27 presented in HNF-23142, there does not appear a significant change in waste streams expected. Thus, the\n28 indicator parameters identified above appear to be sufficient for future detection monitoring at LERF.\n29 From review of the waste stream characterization data for Basins 42, 43, and 44, one additional indicator\n30 parameter (carbon tetrachloride) has been identified as a reliable indication of the presence of a potential\n31 dangerous waste constituent release into the groundwater. Another potential indicator parameter may be\n32 Cr(VI), based on local background results collected during 2014 through 2016.\n33 D2 Hydrogeology and Groundwater-Chemistry\n34 This section describes the geology, hydrogeology, and groundwater chemistry beneath the LERF area.\n35 To date, seven wells have been installed for monitoring the groundwater quality beneath the LERF basins.\n36 Table D-4 provides the well attributes for reference when reviewing this section.\n37 D2.1 Geology\n38 The geology near LERF consists of Columbia River Basalt overlain by a series of sedimentary units of\n39 the Ringold Formation and Hanford formation. The interpretations are based on information from the\n40 following sources:\n41 * Miocene- to Pliocene-Aged Suprabasalt Sediments of the Hanford Site, South-Central Washington\n42 (BHI-00184)\nD-6\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nI * Revised Hydrogeology for the Suprabasalt Aquifer System, 200-East Area and Vicinity, Hanford Site,\n2 Washington (PNNL-12261)\n3 * Hydrogeologic Model for the Gable Gap Area, Hanford Site (PNNL-1 9702)\n4 * Borehole Summary Report for the Installation ofRCRA Wells 299-E26- 77 (C6455), 299-E26- 79\n5 (C6826), 299-E25-236 (C6542) and 199-N-1 65 (C6693), FY 2008 (SGW-3 9344)\n6 * Liquid Effluent Retention Facility Characterization Report (SGW-41072)\n7 * Landstreamer/Gimbaled GeoPhone Acquisition of High Resolution Seismic Reflection Data North of\n8 the 200 Area -Hanford Site (SGW-43746)\n9 * Borehole Summary Report for the Installation of Two RCRA Groundwater Monitoring Wells in the\n10 200 Areas, FY2011 (SGW-51467)\n11 * Seismic Reflection Investigation at the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility, 200 East Area, Hanford\n12 Site Richland, Washington (SGW-52162)\n13 * Integrated Surface Geophysical Investigation Results at Liquid Effluent Retention Facility, 200 East\n14 Area, Hanford, Washington (SGW-52467)\n15 * Site Characterization Report for the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility (WHC-SD-EN-EV-024)\n16 * Borehole Completion Data Package for the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility (WHC-MR-0235)\n17 LERF lies in the Pasco Basin, between the axis of the Umtanum-Gable Mountain anticlinal ridge and the\n18 axis of the Cold Creek syncline. The terrain surrounding the LERF basins is flat to slightly undulating,\n19 and the average elevation is approximately 182 to 184 m (597 to 604 ft) above mean sea level.\n20 The stratigraphy beneath LERF was interpreted from geologic observations during the drilling of seven\n21 boreholes, select analyses of sediment samples, aquifer tests, and geophysical investigations over the past\n22 two decades. The three principal stratigraphic units present near LERF, in ascending order, are the\n23 Elephant Mountain Member of the Saddle Mountains Basalt (EMB), the Ringold Formation, and the\n24 Hanford formation. The thickness of the suprabasalt sediments near the LERF basins ranges from 60 to\n25 69 m (198 to 225 ft).\n26 D2.1.1 Elephant Mountain Member\n27 The nature and extent of the EMB, one of the youngest members of the Saddle Mountains Basalt and the\n28 uppermost basalt in this area, is based on result of observations and documentation of archive samples\n29 collected during drilling, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis, seismic analyses, and hydraulic tests\n30 performed within the upper basalt flow top. The EMB in this area was characterized in\n31 WHC-SD-EN-EV-024 as consisting of only the oldest EMB flow (Elephant Mountain I). This flow is\n32 generally continuous throughout the area, with a thickness ranging from approximately 12 m (39 ft)\n33 where partially eroded, to greater than 35.1 m (115 ft) north of the 200 East Area. The EMB I flow\n34 contains three intraflow structures: colonnade, entablature, and flow top. The colonnade makes up the\n35 bottom third of the flow. The upper part of the colonnade grades from moderate- to well-developed\n36 columns into a platy cross-fractured colonnade and then into a hackly entablature. The entablature has\n37 numerous, irregular cross-fractures, vertical fractures, and small scattered vesicles near its top. The flow\n38 top is characterized by abundant vesicles and is brecciated and/or palagonitic (WHC-SD-EN-EV-024).\n39 Observations during drilling near the LERF basins, when initially encountering the EMB surface, were\n40 described in WHC-MR-0235 as reddish weathered basalt with vesicles partially filled, except in\nD-7\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 wells 299-E26-9 and 299-E26-10, located to the west. However, well 299-E26-77, located next to\n2 well 299-E26-9, was reported with heavy weathering and the presences of vesicles (SGW-41072).\n3 The drilling rate was moderate through the upper EMB to a depth of 2 to 3 m (6.5 to 9.8 ft) when drilling\n4 wells 299-E26-77 and 299-E26-79, respectively (SGW-39344). It was concluded in SGW-41072 that\n5 hydraulic communication of the uppermost aquifer (e.g., unconfined) extends from the suprabasalt\n6 sediments into the basalt, at least in the western half of LERF, because there was no impediment\n7 associated with the overlying Hanford formation sediments. The thickness of the flow top was interpreted\n8 to range from 2 m (6.5 ft) at well 299-E26-77 (west of LERF) to 3.2 m (10.5 ft) at well 299-E26-79\n9 (south of LERF), and 1.5 m (5 ft) at well 299-E26-11 (east of LERF).\n10 The EMB surface expression in the immediate vicinity of the LERF basins forms a depression centered at\n11 the newest well 299-E26-14 (Figure D-3). The contours presented in Figure D-3 are based on a\n12 combination of basalt contact during drilling and various geophysical investigations (e.g., seismic\n13 reflection and refraction, electrical resistivity, and time-domain electromagnetic sounding). Seismic\n14 results to the east and west of well 299-E26-14 portray limited aquifer conditions above the basalt\n15 (Figure D-8). Paleochannels are interpreted to the north and northwest of well 299-E26-14 and continued\n16 to the south-southeast, as displayed in Figures D-3 and D-9. Seismic reflection results suggest an even\n17 deeper depression to the east of well 299-E26-79, centered almost directly south of Basin 43, with as\n18 much as 8 m (26 ft) of aquifer thickness (Figure D-10, black line in figure provides the interpreted top of\n19 basalt). Continuing east of this depression to the south of LERF, the basalt surface is interpreted to rise to\n20 the current water table level. The apparent contact with the water table is estimated to be just south of the\n21 west boundary of Basin 44. Further east, the basalt is interpreted to plateau beyond well 299-E26-1 1. West\n22 of well 299-E26-79, the basalt surface is interpreted to increase in elevation linearly to the elevation of\n23 121.3 m (398 ft) at well 299-E26-10. Finally, Figure D-1 1 provides an angle view of the well casing\n24 extensions from ground surface to basalt in the LERF area and to the west/northwest, including remnant\n25 Ringold Unit A sediments and groundwater extent above basalt. The depiction of the groundwater implies\n26 flow through the basalt flow top as discussed further in Section D2.2. Figure D-12 provides an\n27 interpretation of the basalt surface and Ringold sediments without the groundwater overlay.\n28 D2.1.2 Ringold Formation\n29 The Ringold Formation represents ancient fluvial and lacustrine deposits associated with the ancestral\n30 Columbia River, and the formation exhibits consolidation and weathering. Where present, this Formation\n31 overlies the EMB (Figure D-12). According to WHC-SD-EN-EV-024, remnant muds associated with the\n32 Ringold period exist to the east and northwest of the LERF site at wells 299-E26-1 1 and 299-E35-2,\n33 respectively. 200 East Groundwater Aggregate Area Management Study Report (DOE/RL-92-19)\n34 reported approximately 2.74 m (9 ft) of the Ringold Lower Mud Unit in well 299-E26-11 and mapped the\n35 Lower Mud Unit extending to this location from the east. BHI-00 184 identified the Ringold muds east of\n36 the 200 East Area as paleosol-overbank deposits. WHC-SD-EN-EV-024 concluded that the sediment\n37 layer was a paleosol based on XRF analysis. BHI-00 184 states that pedogenically altered silt- and\n38 clay-rich overbank-paleosol (facies association III) deposits of the Ringold Formation are easily\n39 distinguished from the basalt-rich sand and gravel of the Hanford formation. In 2000, PNNL-12261\n40 defined the sediments near well 299-E26-11 hydraulically as the Ringold Formation Unit A and, more\n41 specifically, the hydrogeologic unit 9C (Figure D-12).\n42 The Ringold sediment at well 299-E26-1 1, as described in WHC-MR-0235, consists of a slightly gravelly\n43 sandy mud (5 percent gravel, 30 percent sand, and 65 percent mud). The color was reported as very dark\n44 grayish brown (1OYR3/2). The gravel content was described as 90 percent mafic, and the sand content\n45 was 50 percent mafic. The sediments had no reaction to hydrochloric acid.\nD-8\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 During drilling of the new well 299-E26-14, low permeability sediments were encountered at 65.5 to 66.1 m\n2 (215.5 to 217 ft) below ground surface (bgs). The sediments were described as 95 percent silt and 5 percent\n3 gravel. Photographic review of this sediment layer, presented in SGW-51467, showed a distinct texture\n4 and color change from the overlying Hanford sandy gravels. The reddish brown hue and yellow tints\n5 associated with this layer correlate well with the distal overbank description provided in BHI-00 184.\n6 Other characteristics associated with this layer included no reaction to hydrochloric, similar to Ringold\n7 sediments described at well 299-E26-1 1. An alternative explanation may be that the apparent Ringold\n8 sediments are rework, removed from one location and deposited at this location, possibly associated with\n9 cataclysmic glacial fluvial floods.\n10 Most of the area beneath LERF is considered devoid of Ringold sediments because of the high energy\n11 scouring associated glacial fluvial flooding in the Pleistocene and the lack of reflectors in the suprabasalt\n12 section during 2011 seismic data reviews. PNNL-19702 presents a conceptual model of various\n13 paleochannels originating to the northwest (Figure D-9). Some of these paleochannels may have been\n14 formed during Ringold times, and isolated remnants of Ringold sediments are sometimes found within\n15 these older paleochannels.\n16 D2.1.3 Hanford Formation\n17 The Hanford formation near LERF ranges in thickness from approximately 59 to 66 m (193 to 215 ft) or\n18 more (Figures D-13 and D-14). The texture of the Hanford formation is loose to weakly cemented, sandy,\n19 pebble-cobble gravels to gravelly sand, with occasional layers of sand and/or muddy sand. Regionally, the\n20 Hanford formation is subdivided into an upper gravel sequence (HI), a sandy sequence (H2), and a lower\n21 gravel sequence (H3). The sandy sequence is present locally and, where it is missing, a single sequence of\n22 gravel-dominated facies exists, which is undifferentiated in cross-sections.\n23 LERF is located along the southern flank of a major west-northwest/east-southeast trending cataclysmic\n24 flood channel. Because of multiple flood events and the turbulence and extremely high energy associated\n25 with these floods, it is difficult to correlate individual strata within flood sequences. In outcrops of the\n26 Hanford formation elsewhere in the Pasco Basin, for example, it is common to see changes from\n27 gravel-dominated sediments to sand and silt-dominated sediments over a distance of a few tens of meters.\n28 In general, more silt or mud was present to the west and east than north or south of the LERF basins\n29 based on geologic logs for the seven wells drilled within the LERF vicinity. However, high silt and clay\n30 content to the north and south of LERF is present near the contact with the EMB within the aquifer.\n31 These silt and clay layers ranged in thickness between 0.3 to 1.5 m (1 to 5 ft) and appear to be of Ringold\n32 age as discussed in D.2.1.2. The basalt content in layers above the silt and clay indicates Hanford origin.\n33 Above these initial layers, the gravel content was generally about 60 percent, consisting of 40 to 70\n34 percent mafics. Significantly more cobbles were described in the north and south boreholes than to the\n35 east and west throughout the borehole log descriptions. The grayish brown to very dark grayish brown\n36 color description of the sediments was consistent throughout the area. Calcium carbonate levels are low to\n37 within 21 m (70 ft) of ground surface, based on little to no reaction to hydrochloric acid. The upper zone\n38 with increased calcium carbonate levels correlates with low modeled velocities during refraction and\n39 resistivity modeling, as stated in SGW-52467, and may be a distinctive feature to differentiate the H1 and\n40 H3 in this area. Moisture observations ranged from dry to wet; however, the damp and wet descriptions in\n41 the vadose zone pertained to zones where water was added during drilling. In conclusion, based on the\n42 larger gravel content and size to the north and south of the LERF basins, the dominant flow during\n43 deposition appears to be from the northwest, aligning with the conceptual model in PNNL-19702\n44 (Figure D-9). In addition, there were no significant zones of silt or clay above the aquifer indicating no\n45 perching horizons in the suprabasalt sediments beneath the LERF vicinity.\nD-9\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 D2.2 Groundwater Hydrology\n2 The vadose zone beneath LERF consists of the Hanford formation and portions of the EMB above the\n3 water table, as well as potentially some of the Ringold Formation near well 299-E26-1 1. There have been\n4 no observations indicating perched water table conditions near the LERF basins; however, perched\n5 conditions could be present west and northwest of the westernmost LERF monitoring wells.\n6 The uppermost aquifer directly beneath LERF is thin to moderate in thickness (e.g., ranging from\n7 possibly not present to greater than 8 m (26.25 ft) and exists in the Hanford and EMB flow top\n8 (Figures D-13 and D-14). This aquifer is unconfined, except to the east where barometric analyses within\n9 well 299-E26-1 1 indicate semiconfined conditions. This is consistent with the rise in groundwater elevation\n10 when drilling advanced through the lower Ringold sediments, present at this well, causing the groundwater\n11 elevation to rise nearly 3.1 m (10 ft) in the temporary casing (WHC-MR-0235). The westward extent of\n12 the Ringold sediments is uncertain; however, it has been portrayed to pinch out west of well 299-E26-11\n13 (Figure D-12). Although well 299-E26-11 is still capable of yielding representative samples from the\n14 same hydrostratigraphic unit as the other LERF wells, the chemical nature of the samples is different and\n15 has been more characteristic of groundwater to the east of LERF.\n16 Well construction details are discussed in Section D2.4 and presented in Table D-4. To date, seven wells\n17 have been installed for detection monitoring since 1990. Three of the wells (299-E26-11, 299-E26-77,\n18 and 299-E26-79) were screened either entirely or primarily within the EMB flow top. The wells produce\n19 at a minimum 22.7 L/min (6 gal/min), which is sufficient for groundwater sampling, and the flow top is\n20 sufficiently permeable for adequate hydraulic connection with the overlying sediments.\n21 Basalt flow top fracturing, brecciation, and/or weathering provide localized zones of higher permeability.\n22 Where these conditions exist and are in hydraulic communication with overlying saturated sediments, the\n23 basalt flow top is part of the overlying unconfined aquifer system. Based on evaluations of drill cuttings,\n24 drilling rates, and water production noted during drilling wells 299-E26-77 and 299-E26-79, the EMB\n25 flow top functions as a component of the unconfined aquifer and forms a laterally continuous aquifer\n26 beneath LERF.\n27 The uppermost aquifer is thickest north of Basin 42 and appears to thicken south of Basin 43\n28 (Figures D-8, D-10, D-13, and D-14) due to paleochannel development. The flow interior of the EMB\n29 represents the lower boundary of the uppermost aquifer. This was verified by observations during drilling\n30 at wells 299-E26-77 and 299-E26-79, as discussed in Section D2. 1.1.\n31 D2.2.1 Aquifer Properties\n32 Hydraulic tests were conducted in 1990, 2003, 2008, and 2011 to derive representative hydraulic\n33 parameters for the various saturated formations beneath the LERF general vicinity. Slug tests were\n34 completed for each of the seven wells with a derived hydraulic conductivity value. The 1990 slug tests\n35 were completed in wells 299-E26-9, 299-E26-10, 299-E26-1 1, and 299-E35-2, which were constructed\n36 with a 10.2 cm (4 in.) diameter wire wrapped screen and 0.25 mm (0.0 10 in.) slot width. A 20-40 silica\n37 sand filter pack encases the screen interval. The following paragraphs summarize the results for each\n38 well, and WHC-SD-EN-EV-024 provides further detailed discussion. The 2003 hydraulic tests were\n39 completed at wells 299-E26-10 and 299-E26-1 1 and consisted of slug tests at each well and the following\n40 additional tests at well 299-E26-1 0: tracer test, tracer-pumpback test, and constant-rate pumping test.\n41 This subsection summarizes the results for each well, and PNNL- 14804, Results ofDetailed Hydrologic\n42 Characterization Tests Fiscal Year 2003, provides further discussion. The 2008 hydraulic slug tests were\n43 completed at wells 299-E26-77 and 299-E26-79, constructed with a 10.2 cm (4 in.) diameter wire\n44 wrapped screens and 0.5 mm (0.020 in.) slot width. A 10-20 silica sand filter pack encases the screen\n45 interval. A slug test at well 299-E26-1 1 also was included in 2008. This subsection summarizes the 2008\nD-1 0\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART Ill, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 results for each well, and SGW-41072 provides further discussion. Finally, a 2011 constant rate pumping\n2 test was completed at well 299-E26-14, which was constructed with 10.2 cm (4 in.) diameter wire wrapped\n3 screens and 0.5 mm (0.020 in.) slot width. A 10-20 silica sand filter pack encases the screen interval.\n4 Because several of the well screens cross various formations, a summary of the screen interval is provided\n5 in the following text and in Table D-4. When heterogeneous conditions exist, the hydraulic results are an\n6 arithmetic average of the individual formational layers based on a weighted-thickness (PNNL-14804).\n7 Well 299-E26-9 (now sample dry) was screened only in the Hanford formation. The 1990 slug test\n8 derived transmissivity values for well 299-E26-9 ranged from 11 to 230 m2/day (118 to 2,476 ft2/day).\n9 The derived hydraulic conductivity ranged between approximately 6 to 120 m/day (20 to 394 ft/day),\n10 assuming an aquifer thickness of 2 m (6.6 ft).\n11 Well 299-E26-10 is screened primarily across the Hanford formation with a small section across the EMB\n12 flow top (0.5 m [1.6 ft]). Transmissivity values for well 299-E26-10 were not derived for the 1990 tests\n13 because of the fast recovery response (e.g., less than 3 seconds). In 2003, four hydraulic slug tests, two\n14 low and two high stress, were performed at well 299-E26-10. The results produced a hydraulic\n15 conductivity range, based on the Kansas Geological Survey (KGS) type-curve method, of 36.7 to\n16 42.8 m/day for both stress-level tests (KGS, 1991, Seismic-Reflection Processing Demonstration Using\n17 Eavesdropper). The KGS type-curve method was used to derive the hydraulic conductivity as explained\n18 in PNNL-14804. The 2003 screened thickness across the saturated Hanford formation was 1.48 m\n19 (4.85 ft). Four additional hydraulic tests were completed at this well in 2003. The tracer-dilution test\n20 provided qualitative evidence that the overlying Hanford formation sediments had a considerably higher\n21 hydraulic conductivity than the EMB flow top. The tracer-pumpback test was used to derive the effective\n22 porosity; however, due to test complexities, the calculation did not appear representative of the aquifer\n23 conditions. The constant-rate pumping test provided another means of deriving the hydraulic\n24 conductivity, which was reported at 36.2 m/d with a transmissivity of 71.6 m2/day. Based on the\n25 consistency of the 2003 results, the hydraulic conductivity ranges between 36.2 and 42.8 m/day.\n26 Well 299-E26-11 is screened only across the EMB flow top. The 1990-derived transmissivity value for\n27 well 299-E26-l 1 was 6.1 m2/d (20 ft2/d) with a hydraulic conductivity of 11.2 m/day (120 ft/day).\n28 Five additional hydraulic slug tests were completed at well 299-E26-11 in 2003, which derived a range of\n29 hydraulic conductivity values from 5.85 to 6.8 m/day. Four additional slug tests were performed in 2008\n30 producing a reported hydraulic conductivity value of 10 m/day. The hydraulic conductivity values for the\n31 three times range from 5.85 to 11.2 m/day. Because of the analysis methods used by PNNL-14804, the\n32 most representative value appears to be 6.3 m/day.\n33 Well 299-E26-14 was completed in 2011 with 5.5 m (18 ft) of screen across the Ringold and Hanford\n34 sediments. Only a small portion (0.27 m or 0.9 ft) of the Ringold sediments are adjacent to the bottom of\n35 the well screen. A 27.3 gal/min constant pump test was completed on November 26, 2011. A transducer\n36 was installed to collect changing water table elevations during the 75 minute pumping test. In total, 2,048\n37 gal were pumped during the test, as described in the field activity log. Because no hydraulic parameters\n38 were calculated from the field activity records, type-curve matching methods were used to derive\n39 transmissivity and hydraulic conductivity results for this well. The computer program AQTESOLV was\n40 used for curve matching. AQTESOLV uses a nonlinear least squares procedure to match a type-curve or\n41 straight-line solution for the data provided. Through a sequence of iterations, the procedure systematically\n42 adjusts the values of hydraulic properties to achieve the best statistical match between a solution\n43 (type-curve) and the test data. Each iteration seeks to minimize the sum of squared residuals.\n44 AQTESOLV provides five different solution methods for unconfined aquifer pumping tests. Initially, the\n45 Theis and Cooper-Jacob methods were evaluated against the field data, but the curve matching associated\n46 with these solution methods did not align (Theis, 1935, \"The Relation Between the Lowering of the\nD-11\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 Piezometric Surface and the Rate and Duration of Discharge of a Well Using Ground-Water Storage;\"\n2 Cooper and Jacob, 1946, \"A Generalized Graphical Method of Evaluating Formation Constants and\n3 Summarizing Well-Field History\"). The Moench method provides independent parameters for wellbore\n4 storage, wellbore skin, and delayed gravity response in anisotropic unconfined aquifers (Moench, 1997,\n5 \"Flow to a well of finite diameter in a homogeneous, anisotropic water table aquifer\"). After manual\n6 manipulation of the independent parameter for the wellbore skin factor and delayed drainage parameter,\n7 the Moench derived curve nearly matched the field results as provided in Figure D-15. The derived\n8 hydraulic conductivity from this curve matching solution was 27.3 m/d. Another solution method,\n9 Neuman, with less independent parameters for manipulation, produced the type-curve in Figure D- 16\n10 (Neuman, 1974, \"Effect of Partial Penetration on Flow in Unconfined Aquifers Considering Delayed\n11 Gravity Response\"). The derived hydraulic conductivity from this curve matching solution was 24.4\n12 m/day. These results agree with the slug results derived for the other wells in the LERF vicinity. The best\n13 estimate is considered 27.3 m/day.\n14 Well 299-E26-77 was completed in 2008 with 6.1 m (20.1 ft) of screen across the EMB flow top and\n15 0.71 m (2.3 ft) across the overlying silty sandy gravel Hanford formation. The 2008 derived hydraulic\n16 conductivity was reported in SGW-41072 at several tens of meters/day. Because there were no specific\n17 values presented in this report, the data from the two slug withdraw tests were retrieved and reanalyzed\n18 with type-curve methods, as discussed in PNNL-14804. Briefly, the type-curve method is useful for\n19 analyzing unconfined aquifer conditions because it uses all or any part of the slug test response.\n20 The computer program AQTESOLV was used for curve matching, as discussed previously.\n21 The automated matching option with default setting was applied to the KGS Model, KGS model with skin\n22 effects, and the Springer-Gelhar inertial effects method (Water-Resources Investigation Report 91-4034,\n23 U.S. Geological Survey Toxic Substances Hydrology Program-Proceedings of the technical meeting,\n24 Monterey, California, March 11-15, 1991). The most comparable slug test derived curve was the\n25 Springer-Gelhar eritically dampened method. This method nearly matched the second slug withdraw\n26 results, as shown in Figure D-17. One of the assumptions for this type-curve is a quasi steady-state of the\n27 aquifer. A quasi steady-state flow neglects specific storage, unlike the Cooper-Bredehoeft-Papadopulos\n28 method (Cooper et al., 1967, \"Response of a Finite-Diameter Well to an Instantaneous Charge of Water\").\n29 When the Cooper-Bredehoeft-Papadopulos method was run, it did not converge with the test data,\n30 indicating the aquifer conditions are more suitable for the Springer-Gelhar method. In addition, the\n31 Barker-Black fractured aquifer solution method failed to converge (Barker and Black, 1983, \"Slug Test in\n32 Fissured Aquifers\"). The Springer-Gelhar results derived a hydraulic conductivity of 134 m/d. For\n33 comparison, three additional methods (Bouwer-Rice, Hvorslev, and Barker-Black double porosity\n34 fractured aquifer method) also were analyzed; however, the curve-type matching alignment with the data\n35 was either significantly different and did not converge or only visually applied to the later recovering slug\n36 test results using line-matching, which produced much greater hydraulic conductivity results (Bouwer and\n37 Rice, 1976, \"A Slug Test for Determining Hydraulic Conductivity of Unconfined Aquifers With\n38 Completely or Partially Penetrating Wells;\" Hvorslev, 1951, Time Lag and Soil Permeability in\n39 Ground- Water Observations). As discussed in PNNL-14804, the semi-empirical nature of the Bouwer\n40 and Rice method for complex well/aquifer conditions can lead to declining levels of accuracy beyond\n41 30 percent. Thus, the best estimate of the hydraulic conductivity for well 299-E26-77 is 134 m/d using the\n42 Springer-Gelhar solution. Because hydraulic conductivity results from other tests in the area produce\n43 much lower results for the Hanford formation, the fractured flow top appears to be the dominant flow\n44 regime at this well. If the fractured flow top is thinner and the borehole diameter within the basalt is\n45 smaller, the hydraulic conductivity value would be even higher. Conversely, if the flow top is thicker and\n46 the borehole diameter is larger, the hydraulic conductivity value would be smaller.\nD-12\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 Well 299-E26-79 was completed in 2008 with 4 m (13.2 ft) of screen across the EMB flow top and 2.7 m\n2 (8.9 ft) across the overlying Ringold and Hanford sediments. The 2008 derived hydraulic conductivity\n3 was reported in SGW-41072 at several tens of meters/day. Because there were no specific values\n4 presented in this report, the two slug withdraw test data were retrieved and reanalyzed with type-curve\n5 methods, as discussed previously for well 299-E26-77. The early slug test data could not be fit by any of\n6 the AQTESOLV solution methods. Fitting the remaining portion of the data produced significantly larger\n7 hydraulic conductivity results by one to two orders of magnitude than at well 299-E26-77. Because the\n8 results are not consistent with the other LERF well results, the data do not appear to be useable; therefore,\n9 no hydraulic conductivity results were generated for this well.\n10 Well 299-E35-2 (now sample dry) was screened mainly across the sediments above the EMB flow top\n11 (1.9 m [6.2 ft]) with a portion of the screen across the EMB flow top (0.4 m [1.3 ft]). The 1990 derived\n12 transmissivity value for well 299-E35-2 was 6 m2/day (20 ft2/day), with a hydraulic conductivity of 39.7\n13 m/day (130 ft/day).\n14 In summary, the multiple slug test results at six of the seven wells described in this subsection adequately\n15 define the hydraulic conductivity for the basalt flow top and Hanford sediments. The basalt flow top slug\n16 test data produced varying results of hydraulic conductivity. To the east, the results were low, while\n17 results to the south and west of LERF were significantly greater than the overlying Ringold and Hanford\n18 sediment results. The range of hydraulic conductivity beneath and west of LERF appears to exceed\n19 100 m/day. A best estimate is 134 m/day. The overlying suprabasalt sediments were consistent with a\n20 hydraulic conductivity range of 24.4 to 42.8 m/day, with a best estimate of 39.5 m/day. These values will\n21 be used to derive the rate of flow for LERF. Although effective porosity was not derived from tests\n22 completed at LERF, the effective porosity to be used for flow rate calculations at LERF is 0.1. This value\n23 was chosen because of the evaluation process discussed in SGW-54508, WMA C September 2012\n24 Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report.\n25 D2.2.2 Flow Dynamics\n26 Regional groundwater flow was initially from west to east but was impacted by groundwater mounding\n27 resulting from wastewater discharges primarily to the east. These impacts have diminished significantly\n28 and do not appear to contribute to the flow regime beneath LERF; however, they still appear to affect the\n29 groundwater quality at well 299-E26-1 1.\n30 Recently, statistical methods have been applied to deriving the flow direction. Table D-5 provides the\n31 gradient and magnitude associated with the statistically corrected calculations since the installation and\n32 water level collection at well 299-E26-14. Although the p-value indicates the derived values have a\n33 moderate amount of uncertainty (e.g., 20 to 30 percent), the direction has been very constant ranging\n34 between 186 and 198 degrees from north (e.g., southwest of south flow). The average direction is\n35 190 degrees from north. In addition, the gradient magnitude has been constant, ranging between 2.39E-04\n36 and 2.98E-04, with an average of 2.7E-4. If these average values are applied to the following formula\n37 V=(K*G)/nk (Driscoll, 1986, Groundwater and Wells); where V is the flow rate, K is the hydraulic\n38 conductivity, G is the gradient, and n, is the effective porosity, then the average flow rate in the\n39 suprabasalt sediments could be 0.11 m/day or 38.9 m/year. This value correlates with the movement of a\n40 sulfate plume originating to the northwest and west of LERF, as explained in Section 2.10.3.6 and displayed\n41 in Figure 2.10-42 of DOE/RL-2008-01, Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring for Fiscal Year 2007.\n42 Although the derived gradient magnitude and associated flow rate beneath LERF is consistent with other\n43 observances of migrating plume rates, as discussed in the previous paragraph, the 190 degree flow\n44 direction and increasing anion and cation concentrations at well 299-E26-14 (Figure D-18) do not\n45 correlate with the perceived source of anion and cation increases. One of the most distinguishable\nD-13\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 constituents associated with the anion and cation increases is sulfate. Sulfate was initially observed\n2 increasing at significant levels at well 299-E34-7, located northwest of LERF, in the mid-1990s, as shown\n3 in Figure D-19. This well became sample dry in 2005, two years after concentrations had peaked at\n4 671 mg/L. The extent and source of the sulfate is uncertain; however, various conceptual models have\n5 been discussed to a limited degree. Movement of the sulfate also has been discussed in several of the\n6 Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring Reports over the past two decades, and an interpreted snapshot of\n7 the sulfate plume is provided for 2008 and 2013 (Figure D-20). Historically, sulfate increases along the\n8 west side of the LERF monitoring network appear to be associated with transverse dispersivity because of\n9 the lack of vadose zone moisture during drilling well 299-E26-77, the derived southward flow direction\n10 from monitoring network, and smaller slope of sulfate increase at well 299-E26- 10 than at well\n11 299-E34-7 (Figure D-19).\n12 More recently, the rate and direction of groundwater flow appear to be in a state of change regionally.\n13 Sulfate concentrations leveled off between 2009 and 2011 near LERF, when the regional flow conditions\n14 were considered to be at a minimum compared to previous years (Figure D-18). Since the middle of 2011,\n15 when the Columbia River elevation began to exceed the 200 East groundwater elevations, concentrations\n16 have been increasing at a greater rate in wells farther east than at well 299-E26-10 (Figure D-18).\n17 Three explanations are provided for what may be occurring:\n18 * The northwest sulfate source may be diminishing and because well 299-E26-10 is spatially closer to\n19 the source, it is beginning to decrease with the decreasing front, while wells 299-E26-14 and\n20 299-E26-79, farther spatially from the proposed northwest source, are still within the increasing front\n21 of the sulfate plume.\n22 * The flow direction has shifted to a southeast of east to an easterly flow direction, causing greater\n23 concentrations to migrate preferentially toward wells 299-E26-14 and 299-E26-79.\n24 * The source of sulfate increases may be from a more regional source as sulfate increases have also\n25 been seen at well 299-E26-1 1, but to a smaller degree, and delayed compared to well 299-E26-10\n26 (Figure D-2 1).\n27 Because of the consistent flow direction derived by the current monitoring network and the larger\n28 influence of sulfate increases seen across the LERF monitoring network, the sulfate increases are\n29 considered to be from a larger regional source. As such, well 299-E26-14 provides a sufficient\n30 representation of the groundwater quality migrating into the area from the north. However, to ensure that\n31 conditions continue to reflect this conceptual flow model, well 299-E26-77 will be monitored but\n32 considered a crossgradient monitoring well and not included in upgradient statistical measurements.\n33 Water levels will continue to be collected at wells 299-E26-10 and 299-E26-77 to maintain statistical\n34 analyses of the flow direction. Should conditions change in the statistically derived flow direction or\n35 groundwater quality parameters at well 299-E26-77 suggest a change in sulfate migration, then the\n36 information will be relayed in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) quarterly\n37 report with a proposed action.\n38 Based on the accepted southward flow direction, well 299-E26-79 is the only downgradient well currently\n39 at LERF. Because the basalt flow top appears to be connected hydraulically to the suprabasalt sediments\n40 and provides a potentially more transmissive pathway, well 299-E26-79 does not appear to be sufficiently\n41 located to monitor the easternmost basin.\n42 D2.3 Groundwater Chemistry\n43 Groundwater chemistry in the uppermost aquifer beneath LERF was affected by several years of diluted\n44 liquid waste discharge to the 216-B-3 Pond System, which ceased in 1997. Figure D-22 provides an\nD-14\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 illustration of the groundwater chemical facies at various LERF wells from the early 1990s to 2013 using\n2 Stiff Diagrams. As can be seen in the figure during the early to mid-1990s, the groundwater chemical\n3 facies was calcium-bicarbonate, except to the west of LERF where a calcium-bicarbonate-sulfate facies\n4 was present at well 299-E34-7. By 1999, the groundwater at well 299-E34-7 was a strong calcium-sulfate\n5 facies, and well 299-E26-10, located to the southeast of well 299-E34-7, was changing to a\n6 calcium-sulfate facies. In 2001, well 299-E26-10 was a calcium-sulfate facies.\n7 In 2006, well 299-E26-1 1, located to the east of LERF, was beginning to show signs of changing from a\n8 calcium-bicarbonate facies. By 2011, well 299-E26-11 also had changed to a calcium-sulfate facies.\n9 Although well 299-E26-11 saw a change in the chemical nature of the groundwater after wells to the\n10 west, it has had a greater water elevation than the wells to the west. This indicates the water facies change\n11 must be from north of well 299-E26-1 1. Further east at well 699-45-42, located east of well 299-E26-11,\n12 a calcium-bicarbonate chemical facies was still present in 2012.\n13 The wells to the north and south of LERF portray an intermediate chemical facies, which is between the\n14 strong calcium-sulfate facies to the west and the more dilute calcium-sulfate facies to the east.\n15 For comparison, the calcium and sulfate milliequivalents in well 299-E26-10 in January of 2013 were\n16 6.4 to 5.5, respectively. The milliequivalents at well 299-E26-11 in January 2013 were 2.6 for both\n17 calcium and sulfate. The January 2013 milliequivalent results for wells 299-E26-14 and 299-E26-79 were\n18 3.9 to 3.3 and 3.7 to 3.0, respectively. Thus, the chemical facies is slightly stronger to the north of LERF\n19 than south, which is downgradient of LERF.\n20 The fact that all the wells near LERF are showing chemical facies changes to a calcium-sulfate indicates\n21 that the wells are hydraulically connected and that there is a sulfate source to the north of LERF.\n22 Water quality parameters will continue to be collected semiannually for purposes of further evaluation, as\n23 shown in Table D-6.\n24 D2.4 Well Completions and Conditions\n25 The basic well information is summarized in Table D-4 and in Figures D-23 through D-27. Five wells are\n26 provided for discussions related to the geology and hydrogeology; however, only four of the wells\n27 (299-E26-10, 299-E26-14, 299-E26-77, and 299-E26-79) are being used for monitoring the groundwater\n28 near LERF. The four wells allow use of statistical measures to derive a groundwater gradient and direction.\n29 All four wells extend beyond 61 m (200 ft) in depth. Although the new wells extend 5.5 to 6.1 m\n30 (18 to 20 ft) into the EMB, the screened intervals in all four wells intercept the unconfined aquifer as\n31 discussed in Section D2.2.1.\n32 The initial LERF groundwater monitoring wells were installed in 1990 and included three downgradient\n33 wells on the west end of the facility boundary and one upgradient well at the east end of the facility. This\n34 configuration was based on the east-to-west groundwater flow direction, caused by the recharge mound\n35 created by years of liquid effluent disposal to B Pond. Wells 299-E26-9, 299-E26-10, and 299-E35-2\n36 were originally installed as downgradient wells and well 299-E26-11 as an upgradient well. Wells\n37 299-E26-77 and 299-E26-79 were installed in 2008. Well 299-E26-77 is adjacent to the location of well\n38 299-E26-9, and well 299-E26-79 is south of LERF between Basins 42 and 43 (Figure D-2). Well\n39 299-E26-10 (Figure D-23) has a 4.5 m (15 ft) screen, screening across the entire saturated suprabasalt\n40 sediments. The well screen in 299-E26-10 penetrates approximately 0.5 m (1.8 ft) into the basalt. Well\n41 299-E26-1 1 (Figure D-3 and D.24) was completed with a 1.5 m (5 ft) long channel-pack screen placed\n42 completely within the basalt flow top and includes a sand pack that extends 1.3 m (4.4 ft) above the\n43 screen top.\nD-1 5\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 Well 299-E26-14 encountered groundwater at approximately 60.5 m (198.4 ft) bgs and was drilled to a\n2 total depth of 73.3 m (240.6 ft) bgs (Figure D-25). The well is constructed with 6.1 m (20 ft) total length\n3 of screen installed across approximately 5.5 m (18 ft) of Ringold and Hanford sediments. Only a small\n4 portion (0.27 m or 0.9 ft) of the Ringold sediments are adjacent the bottom of the well screen. The screen\n5 is 10 cm (4 in.) in diameter, 20 slot, stainless-steel wire-wrap. The well has a 1 m (3 ft) blank sump below\n6 the screen. The casing from the top of the screen to land surface is 10 cm (4 in.) diameter stainless steel.\n7 Well 299-E26-77 encountered groundwater at approximately 63.4 m (208 ft) bgs and was drilled to a total\n8 depth of 71 m (232.8 ft) bgs (Figure D-26). The well is constructed with 7.6 m (25 ft) total length of screen\n9 installed across approximately 1.4 m (4.6 ft) of sediments and 6.2 m (21.4 ft) of basalt flow top. Well\n10 299-E26-79 encountered groundwater at 61.5 m (201.7 ft) bgs and was drilled to a total depth of 68.5 m\n11 (224.8 ft) bgs (Figure D-27). The well is constructed with 7.6 m (25 ft) total length of screen installed across\n12 approximately 3.7 m (12 ft) of sediments and 3.9 m (13 ft) of basalt flow top. The screens are 10 cm (4 in.)\n13 in diameter, 20-slot, stainless-steel wire-wrap. Both wells have a 1 m (3 ft) blank sump below the screens.\n14 The casing from the top of the screen to land surface is 10 cm (4 in.) diameter stainless steel.\n15 The longevity of the operable monitoring lifetime for the remaining LERF wells is not a concern as water\n16 levels are only being collected from well 299-E26-10 and, based on recent water level declines, should be\n17 useable for decades. The other three wells have significant water for sample collection and should not go\n18 dry, based on pre-Hanford groundwater elevations.\n19 D3 Groundwater-Monitoring Program\n20 Groundwater monitoring at LERF is in detection monitoring and the indicator parameters are discussed\n21 further in Section D3.6.1. The indicator parameters were derived as summarized in Section D3.2 and\n22 discussed in further detail in Section DI.5. The detection monitoring sample frequency is semiannual as\n23 discussed in Section D3.6.2. Sampling irocedures and required documentation is provided in Sections\n24 D3.6.3 and D3.6.4, respectively. The analytical procedures, analytical quality control (QC), data\n25 management are discussed in Sections D3.9, D3.9.1, and D3.9.2, respectively.\n26 Statistical methods are employed to determine local background conditions for the upgradient well\n27 299-E26-14 as provided in Section D3.9.3. Detection monitoring at LERF is discussed in Section D3.4.\n28 Should indicator parameter results exceed local background levels then resampling will be implemented\n29 for determining if a false positive result has occurred or if assessment monitoring must be undertaken as\n30 discussed in Sections D3.3, D3.9.3, and D3.1 1.\n31 Reporting will be annually through the Hanford Site Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report unless a\n32 significant exceedance of the background values determined for the upgradient well 299-E26-14 is\n33 verified. If an exceedance is verified then the notification process discussed in Section D3.11 will be\n34 followed.\n35 As discussed in Sections Dl and D2 and their subsections, the following characteristics describe the\n36 hydrogeology in the LERF area:\n37 * Representative groundwater samples can be collected from the uppermost aquifer.\n38 * Upgradient background samples at well 299-E26-14 are representative of unaffected groundwater\n39 from LERF.\n40 * Groundwater samples collected at well 299-E26-79 are representative of the quality of groundwater\n41 passing the LERF point of compliances.\nD-16\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 Hydraulic characterization tests conducted over the past two decades and the groundwater chemical facies\n2 changes indicate the hydrostratigraphic units underlying the LERF basins constitute an aquifer unit that is\n3 continuous beneath the LERF basins and is capable of yielding representative groundwater samples.\n4 D3.1 Objectives of Dangerous Waste Groundwater Monitoring and Past Monitoring Results\n5 A groundwater monitoring program, in accordance with the requirements of WAC 173-303-645, is\n6 designed to determine whether there is statistically significant evidence of contamination in the\n7 uppermost aquifer attributable to the LERF basins. The statistical parametric t-test approach at LERF\n8 compares two distinct statistical populations for true differences in population means as discussed further\n9 in Section D3.9.3.\n10 By the date of this permit, the action leakage rate has not been exceeded during operations, and results of\n11 the LERF groundwater monitoring program indicate the LERF basins have not impacted groundwater\n12 quality beneath the site. Past monitoring results from former downgradient wells 299-E26-10 and\n13 299-E26-1 1, and more recent results from newer wells 299-E26-77 and 299-E26-79, have not indicated\n14 dangerous constituents above background levels, with the exception of one positive carbon tetrachloride\n15 result at each well. Because the detections were followed by a series of non-detect values and the results\n16 were associated with out-of-limit QC samples, the reported concentrations appeared to be associated with\n17 a laboratory error and were flagged as suspect. As a result, a detection monitoring program in accordance\n18 with WAC 173-303-645(9) is appropriate for the site to provide compliance with the requirements of\n19 WAC 173-303-645.\n20 D3.2 Dangerous Constituents\n21 A list of dangerous and/or mixed aqueous waste that can be accepted in LERF is defined by the\n22 requirements of Addendum B (Waste Analysis Plan).\n23 Dangerous constituents and suitable indicator parameters that provide a reliable indication of the presence\n24 of dangerous constituents in groundwater for purposes of groundwater monitoring were based on target\n25 parameter constituents from Addendum B (Waste Analysis Plan), and results of LERF basin water\n26 samples collected between July 1999 and June 2013. Several target parameters in the Waste Analysis Plan\n27 (Addendum B) occur in the LERF basin influent data and were evaluated relative to the dangerous waste\n28 characteristics (groundwater monitoring list in WAC 173-303-090, \"Dangerous Waste Characteristics,\"\n29 and Ecology Publication 97-407, Chemical Testing Methods for Designating Dangerous Waste:\n30 WAC 173-303-090 & -100, Appendix 5. As discussed in Section D1.5, dangerous waste constituents\n31 measured as part of routine liquid sampling in the LERF basins were included as indicator parameters.\n32 Tables D-1 through D-3 present a list of dangerous constituents measured as part of routine liquid\n33 sampling in the LERF basins from as early as February of 2000 through 2011. The results were further\n34 evaluated to identify reliable parameters for the indication or identification of dangerous waste\n35 constituents in groundwater, as discussed in Section D1.5. The full list of groundwater monitoring\n36 indicator parameters is provided in Section D3.6.1.\n37 D3.3 Concentration Limits\n38 A series of events that triggers the shift from detection monitoring to compliance monitoring is prescribed\n39 in WAC 173-303-645. If there is statistically significant evidence of contamination, as required in\n40 WAC 173-303-645(9)(f), groundwater protection standards and concentration limits will be established\n41 subsequently in accordance with WAC 173-303-645(9)(g)(iv)(D). Section D3.1 1, Evaluation and\n42 Notification, provides the process and schedule for actions, notification, and permit modification, if\n43 necessary.\nD-17\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 If a tolerance limit is exceeded at a statistically significant level, additional measurements will be\n2 conducted to verify that a detection event has occurred. If the detection of a dangerous constituent is\n3 verified, as discussed in Section D3.1 1, compliance monitoring will be implemented in accordance with\n4 WAC 173-303-645(10).\n5 D3.4 Groundwater Monitoring System and Point of Compliance\n6 The groundwater monitoring system for LERF uses existing wells, 299-E26-14 and 299-E26-79.\n7 Well 299-E26-14 is an upgradient well and well 299-E26-79 is a downgradient well based on the flow\n8 direction presented in Section D2.2.2. A third detection monitoring well will need to be installed just\n9 south of the open interval between Basin 43 and 44 in order to compare the groundwater quality\n10 downgradient of LERF Basin 44 (Figure D-28). All three of these wells will be monitored in accordance\n11 with the requirements provided in this permit. The additional well to be installed, 299-E26-15, will be\n12 planned through Tri-Party Agreement (Ecology et al., 1989, Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and\n13 Consent Order) Milestone M-024, which is updated on a yearly basis. The well is tentatively planned to\n14 be installed prior before fiscal year 2016.\n15 D3.5 Compliance Period\n16 The compliance period will be the number of years equal to the active life of the waste management area\n17 including any additional years required for corrective actions, if necessary. Any additional years\n18 associated with corrective actions will be completed after three consecutive years in which the\n19 groundwater protective standard for any specific dangerous waste constituent has not been exceeded in\n20 accordance with WAC 173-303-645(7).\n21 D3.6 Sampling and Analysis\n22 This section describes the groundwater detection sampling and analysis program for the three LERF\n23 regulated units (Basins 42, 43, and 44), including monitoring parameters, analytical methods, monitoring\n24 frequency, and sampling protocols.\n25 D3.6.1 Monitoring Parameters\n26 Monitoring parameters include the indicator and geochemical parameters. The monitoring of these two\n27 parameters is similar, and sampling and analysis frequencies are the same and will be done concurrently\n28 on a semiannual basis.\n29 As identified in Section DI.5, carbon tetrachloride and TOX are reliable indicator parameters for the\n30 presence of dangerous constituents associated with LERF. In addition, the standard parameters of pH,\n31 specific conductance, and TOC provide the requirements of detection monitoring in accordance with\n32 WAC 173-303-645(9)(a). Table D-7 provides a list of these constituents and the frequency of sampling.\n33 Samples will also be collected semiannually and analyzed for major anions, cations, and alkalinity to\n34 evaluate groundwater geochemistry, as discussed in Table D-6.\n35 Samples also will be collected for Cr(VI) for evaluation as an additional indicator parameter, as discussed\n36 in Section D1.5.\n37 D3.6.2 Sampling Frequency\n38 Samples will be collected semiannually from wells 299-E26-14 and 299-E26-79 to determine whether\n39 there is statistically significant evidence of contamination for the indicator parameters established in\n40 Section D3.6.1.\n41 Samples will be collected semiannually and analyzed for major anions, cations, and alkalinity to evaluate\n42 groundwater geochemistry, as discussed in Section D2.3 and shown in Table D-6.\nD-18\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 Finally, samples will be collected semiannually for Cr(VI) evaluation as an indicator parameter, as\n2 discussed in Section D 1.5 and Table D-7.\n3 D3.6.3 Sampling Procedures\n4 Groundwater sampling procedures, sample collection documentation, sample preservation and shipment,\n5 and chain-of-custody requirements are described in this subsection. The Permittees will develop,\n6 maintain, and conduct work according to procedures consistent with, and no less stringent than, those\n7 described to be conducted. The Permittees will maintain current copies of these procedures in the\n8 Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF, and 200 Area ETF file, as required by Permit Condition 11.1.1\n9 Samplers fill out groundwater sample report forms as they purge and sample each well. Field personnel\n10 measure water levels in each well before sampling and then purge stagnant water from the well. Field\n11 personnel also record time of sampling, which allows correlation with barometric pressure measurements\n12 at the Hanford Meteorological Station. Water levels are typically measured with laminated-steel electrical\n13 sounding tapes with a precision of 2 mm. Procedures require sample collection after three casing volumes\n14 of water have been purged from the well and after field parameters (pH, temperature, specific\n15 conductance, and turbidity) have stabilized. Field parameters are measured in a flow-through chamber.\n16 Both filtered and unfiltered samples are collected for metals analyses. Filtering is performed in the field\n17 with 0.45-micron, in-line, disposable filters to ensure that results represent dissolved metals and do not\n18 include particulates. Dissolved trace metals analysis (from filtered samples) will be used for statistical\n19 analyses of trace metal arsenic.\n20 Sample preservation techniques will follow generally accepted practices (e.g., U.S. Environmental\n21 Protection Agency [EPA]-approved guidelines such as SW-846, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid\n22 Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition; Final Update IV-B, Table 11-1, or equivalent) and\n23 will be documented in sample authorization forms generated by the Sample and Data Management\n24 organization. Chemical preservatives are added to collection bottles before use in the field. A chemical\n25 preservative label is affixed to the sample container listing the specific preservative. The preservative's\n26 brand name, lot number, concentration, and date opened are recorded. As part of sample preservation,\n27 samples may be refrigerated or stored on ice as necessary prior to delivery to the analyzing laboratory.\n28 D3.6.4 Sample Chain-of-Custody\n29 Groundwater samplers use chain-of-custody forms to document the integrity of groundwater samples from\n30 the time of collection through data reporting. The forms are generated during scheduling and are managed\n31 through a documented procedure. Required information recorded on the forms includes the following:\n32 * Sampler's name\n33 * Method of shipment and destination\n34 * Collection date and time\n35 * Sample identification numbers\n36 * Analysis methods\n37 * Preservation methods\n38 Samples are labeled and sealed with evidence tape, wrapped with bubble wrap, and placed in a\n39 U.S. Department of Transportation-approved container with ice, as appropriate. The packaging parameters\n40 for samples are determined by associated hazards. Samples for offsite laboratories are shipped according\n41 to U.S. Department of Transportation regulations. A chain-of-custody form accompanies all samples.\nD-19\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 When samples are transferred from one custodian to another (e.g., from sampler to shipper, or from\n2 shipper to analytical laboratory), the receiving custodian inspects the form and the samples, noting any\n3 deficiencies. Each transfer of custody is documented by the printed names and signatures of the custodian\n4 relinquishing the samples and the custodian receiving the samples, as well as the time and date of transfer.\n5 Commercial shippers do not sign chain-of-custody forms, but the forms are signed by the receiving\n6 laboratory, and sample integrity is verified by inspecting the bottle seals.\n7 D3.7 Decontamination of Drilling and Sampling Equipment\n8 The following information is included relative to well drilling equipment for new wells installed at LERF\n9 for this Permit. Well drilling equipment is decontaminated using high temperature and pressure washing.\n10 The equipment then is rinsed with clean water.\n11 Equipment for collecting soil samples during drilling for later chemical analysis is decontaminated.\n12 Equipment is washed with phosphate-free detergent, rinsed three times with de-ionized water, rinsed once\n13 with nitric acid (glass or stainless-steel equipment only), rinsed three more times with de-ionized water,\n14 and then finally rinsed with hexane. After heat drying, equipment is wrapped in unused aluminum foil and\n15 sealed with tape until needed. The tape shall not come into contact with the equipment to avoid any\n16 contamination from the materials in the tape.\n17 Monitoring wells for LERF shall be equipped with dedicated sampling pumps. Sample pumps are placed\n18 at approximately mid-depth within the screen interval. Water-level measuring tapes are cleaned with\n19 potable or deionized water and a clean towel. Sample manifolds used at the well head require\n20 decontamination as follows: wash with a phosphate-free detergent, rinse three times in high-purity water,\n21 rinse in a 1 M solution of nitric acid, rinse three more times in high-purity water, then rinse in hexane, and\n22 finally dry in drying chamber. These are done in accordance with established procedures.\n23 D3.8 Quality Objectives and Criteria\n24 The QC program is designed to assess and assure the reliability and validity of groundwater data, and to\n25 document whether the resulting data are of the quantity and quality necessary for the intended decision-\n26 making purpose. In groundwater detection monitoring, the primary decision-making purpose is to\n27 determine whether a statistically significant increase in a dangerous constituent concentration is observed\n28 in groundwater downgradient from the permitted site. Consequently, data quality is monitored by\n29 evaluating the results of QC samples, conducting audits, validating groundwater data, and comparing\n30 these results to data quality requirements established in this groundwater monitoring plan. Accuracy,\n31 precision, and detection are the primary parameters used to assess data quality. Data for these parameters\n32 are obtained from two categories of QC samples: field QC samples that provide checks on field and\n33 laboratory activities, and laboratory QC samples that monitor laboratory performance. Table D-8\n34 summarizes the types of samples in each category and the sample frequencies and characteristics\n35 evaluated.\n36 D3.9 Analytical Procedures\n37 All field and laboratory instrumentation are calibrated using approved procedures, and analytical\n38 measurements are generated according to approved procedures. These procedures include quality checks\n39 to ensure the resulting analytical values are of known quality.\n40 Instruments for field measurements (e.g., pH, specific conductance, temperature, and turbidity) are\n41 verified using standard solutions before use. These include, for pH, 4, 7, and 10 buffer/standard solutions;\n42 for specific conductance, 445 uS/cm and 1,413 uS/cm solutions; and for turbidity, Gelex standards 0-10,\n43 0-100, and 0-1,000 nephelometric turbidity units. Instruments are operated in accordance with the\nD-20\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 manufacturer's instructions. Each instrument is assigned a unique number that is tracked via calibration\n2 documentation and field logbooks and sampling reports.\n3 Laboratory analytical methods are specified in Table D-9 and are generally specified in contracts with the\n4 laboratories. Laboratory methods for chemical parameters are typically standard methods from SW-846;\n5 EPA-600/4-79-020, Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes; or A-PHA/AWWA/WEF, 2012,\n6 Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Analytes, analytical methods, and\n7 required maximum practical quantitation limits are shown in Table D-9.\n8 D3.9.1 Quality Control\n9 QC data are evaluated based on acceptance criteria for each QC sample type, as summarized by\n10 constituent in Table D-10. These criteria limits are intended to provide confidence that the analytical and\n11 field methods are in control and provide data of known quality. For field and method blanks, the\n12 acceptance limit is two times the instrument detection limit (metals) or method detection limit (other\n13 chemical parameters), except for the common laboratory contaminants 2-butanone, acetone, methylene\n14 chloride, toluene, and phthalate esters where the limit is five times the method detection limit.\n15 Groundwater samples that are associated (i.e., collected on the same date and analyzed by the same\n16 method) with out-of-limit field blanks are given a review qualifier of \"Q\" in the Hanford Environmental\n17 Information System (HEIS) database to indicate a potential problem, and then recorded in the Hanford\n18 Facility Operating Record, LERF, and 200 Area ETF file pursuant to Permit Condition III.3.D.1.b.\n19 Field duplicates must agree within 20 percent (as measured by relative percent difference) to be\n20 acceptable. Only those field duplicates with at least one result greater than five times the appropriate\n21 detection limit shall be evaluated. In the case where one result is a non-detect, the detection limit is used\n22 to calculate the relative percent difference. Unacceptable field duplicate results are given a review\n23 qualifier of \"Q\" in the database and recorded in the Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF, and 200\n24 Area ETF file.\n25 The specified frequency for laboratory duplicates, matrix spikes, matrix spike duplicates, surrogates, and\n26 laboratory control samples are defined in Table D-10 in accordance with SW-846. The acceptance criteria\n27 for the associated parameter data shall be analyzed and recorded in accordance with Section D3.10.2.\n28 Sample holding times depend on the analyte and are specified in the Environmental Quality Assurance\n29 Program Plan. Data associated with exceeded holding times are given a review qualifier of \"H\" in the\n30 HEIS database and noted in the Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF, and 200 Area ETF file.\n31 Data exceeding holding times shall be maintained but potentially may not be used in statistical analyses.\n32 Table D-1 1 lists the acceptable accuracy for the blind standards for carbon tetrachloride and TOX. These\n33 samples are prepared by spiking Hanford background well water (currently, wells 699-19-88 and\n34 699-49-100C) with known concentrations of constituents of interest. Spiking concentrations range from\n35 the detection limit to the upper limit of concentration determined in groundwater on the Hanford Site.\n36 Investigations shall be conducted for blind standards that are outside of acceptance limits. The results\n37 from these standards shall be used to determine acceptability of the associated parameter data.\n38 Additional QC measures include laboratory audits and participation in nationally based performance\n39 evaluation studies. Audit results are used to improve performance. Summaries of audit results and\n40 performance evaluation studies shall be incorporated into the Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF,\n41 and 200 Area ETF file as appropriate to substantiate data quality objectives (DQOs) and data acceptance\n42 criteria.\nD-21\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 D3.9.2 Data Management\n2 This section describes data management practices.\n3 Loading Data\n4 The contract laboratories report analytical results electronically and in hardcopy. The electronic results\n5 shall be loaded into the HEIS database as they are received from the laboratories. The appropriate\n6 sections of the HEIS shall be incorporated by reference into the Hanford Facility Operating Record,\n7 LERF, and 200 Area ETF file to satisfy Permit Condition III.3D. 1.b. Field data (e.g., specific conductance,\n8 pH, temperature, turbidity, and depth to water) are recorded on field records. Data management staff enter\n9 field data into the HEIS database manually through data-entry screens and verify each value against the\n10 hardcopy. An electronic field data collection system may be implemented soon, which would replace the\n11 manual field data collection and the manual data entry process when it is implemented.\n12 Data not available electronically may include well logbooks, borehole videos, geologic descriptions, field\n13 screening data, or other information.\n14 Data Review, Verification, Validation, and Usability\n15 The final data review shall determine whether data meet the criteria specified in this subsection. The work\n16 activities shall follow documented procedures and processes for data validation and verification.\n17 Validation of groundwater data involves assessing whether the data collected and measured meet\n18 contractual quality requirements. Verification involves assessing data accuracy, completeness,\n19 consistency, availability, and internal control practices to determine overall reliability of the data\n20 collected. Other DQOs that shall be met include the proper chain-of-custody, sample handling, use of\n21 proper analytical techniques for each constituent, and the quality and acceptability of the laboratory\n22 analyses conducted.\n23 Groundwater monitoring staff performs checks on laboratory electronic data files for formatting, allowed\n24 values, data flagging (qualifiers), and completeness. A percentage of hardcopy results are verified to\n25 check for completeness; notes on condition of samples upon receipt by the laboratory; notes on problems\n26 that arose during the analysis of the samples; and correct reporting of results. If data are incomplete or\n27 deficient, staff will work with the laboratory to correct the problem discovered during the analysis.\n28 The data validation process provides the requirements and guidance for validating groundwater data that\n29 are routinely collected. Validation is a systematic process of reviewing verified data against a set of\n30 criteria (listed in Table D-10) to determine whether the data are acceptable for their intended use.\n31 Results of laboratory and field QC evaluations, blind sample results, laboratory performance evaluation\n32 samples, and holding-time criteria are considered when determining data usability. Staff review the data\n33 to identify whether observed changes reflect changes in groundwater quality or potential data errors, and\n34 they may request data reviews of laboratory, field, or water-level data for usability purposes. The laboratory\n35 may be requested to check calculations or reanalyze the sample, or the well may be resampled. Results of\n36 the data reviews are used to determine what appropriate review qualifier should be applied to the analytical\n37 results in the HEIS database (e.g., \"R\" for reject, \"Y\" for suspect, or \"G\" for good) and/or to add comments.\n38 Upon final data acceptance, both the raw data and the accepted/validated data shall be incorporated into\n39 the Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF, and 200 Area ETF file.\n40 Data Review Corrective Actions\n41 The responses to data quality defects are identified through the verification/validation process. Corrective\n42 actions are shown in Table D-8.\nD-22\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 D3.9.3 Statistical Analysis of Groundwater Monitoring Data\n2 Groundwater monitoring constituents have been identified for the LERF basins and are listed in\n3 Table D-10. The dangerous constituents and indicator parameters used to indicate the presence of\n4 contamination (WAC 173-303-645(9)(a)) and subject to statistical evaluation are listed in Table D-7 and\n5 include carbon tetrachloride, pH, specific conductance, TOC, and TOX.\n6 To establish background conditions, the previous data collected over the past two years will be used.\n7 Every year, background results will be evaluated for updating the critical mean for each indicator\n8 parameter identified in Table D-8. Sample collection and analysis will continue on a semiannual basis.\n9 The statistical method for comparing baseline (background) groundwater quality with compliance-point\n10 groundwater quality is the Welch's t-test in accordance with WAC 173-303-645(8)(h)(i), and it is\n11 recommended for detection monitoring when population variances might differ between two groups, as\n12 stated in EPA 530/R-09-007, Statistical Analysis of Groundwater Monitoring Data at RCRA Facilities\n13 Unified Guidance. Applying this parametric t-test provides a reasonably robust statistical procedure and\n14 assurance when background data are at a minimum and the underlying populations may not meet\n15 normality. However, normality can usually be met by log transforming the data. As more background data\n16 is generated for well 299-E26-14, additional tests may be applied if spatial variability becomes an issue,\n17 such as the Wilcoxon Rank-sum Test.\n18 The Welch's t-test procedure can be implemented as follows:\n219 I. Compute the sample mean 9, standard deviation s, and variance s , in each of the\n20 background and compliance well data sets.\nS2 S2\n21 II. Compute Welch's t-statistic using the following equation t = (XC -XBG\nnBG nC\n22 III. Compute the approximate degrees of freedom using the following equation\ns 2 Sc (S2BG BG/n12 (S2c /n2df = + -+\nknBG nc n BG c\n23 IV. Use Table 16-1 of Appendix D in EPA 530/R-09-007 to assign the upper 95 percent\n24 critical mean based on the degrees of freedom.\n25 V. Compare the t-statistic against the critical point, tqp. When the condition t < tp, conclude\n26 there is no statistically significant difference between the background and compliance point\n27 population means. If, however, t > tp, conclude that the compliance point population\n28 mean is significantly greater than the background mean at the a level of significance.\n29 As monitoring continues and the process is shown to be in control (i.e., there is no statistically significant\n30 evidence of facility impact to groundwater), the baseline mean and standard deviation should be updated\n31 periodically (e.g., every 1 or 2 years) to incorporate the new data (EPA 530/R-09-007). This reduces\n32 uncertainty in the background and helps adjust for groundwater influences from outside sources.\n33 This updating process should continue for the lifetime of the monitoring program.\n34 If an exceedance occurs, resampling will be undertaken to verify or refute the original exceedance.\n35 The analytical result from the resample is substituted into the previous formulas in place of the original\n36 value obtained, and the Welch's t-test statistic is updated. If resampling does not confirm the exceedance,\n37 and ifthe exceedance can be shown to be a measurement in error or a confirmed outlier, it should be\n38 excluded from the revised background. Otherwise, any disconfirmed exceedances (including any\nD-23\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 resamples that exceed the background limit but are disconfirmed by other resamples) should probably be\n2 included when updating the background The reason is that background limits designed to incorporate\n3 retesting are computed as low as possible to ensure adequate statistical power (EPA 530/R-09-007).\n4 D3.10 Reporting and Recordkeeping\n5 Reporting of monitoring evaluations for LERF will be carried out through the Hanford Site Annual\n6 Groundwater Monitoring Report.\n7 Pertinent information for groundwater monitoring and electronic files for groundwater data shall be\n8 maintained in the Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF, and 200 Area ETF file required by Permit\n9 Condition 11.1.1. Records may be stored in either electronic or hardcopy format.\n10 The Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF, and 200 Area ETF file will also include, consistent with\n11 Permit Condition III.3.D.1.b, the following items:\n12 * Groundwater sample reports\n13 * Chain-of-custody forms\n14 * Sample receipt records\n15 D3.11 Evaluation and Notification\n16 Groundwater flow rate and direction in the uppermost aquifer will be evaluated and reported annually.\n17 Groundwater indicator parameter data collected under this permit will be reviewed semiannually to\n18 determine if there is statistically significant evidence of contamination (in accordance with\n19 WAC 173-303-645(9)(f)) using the statistical method provided in Section D3.9.3. The results of the\n20 statistical evaluation and associated information will be submitted to the Washington State Department of\n21 Ecology (Ecology) annually through the Hanford Site Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report\n22 (WAC 173-303-645(9)(c)).\n23 If statistically significant evidence of contamination is determined for one or more of the dangerous\n24 constituents or indicator parameters, at any monitoring well at the compliance point, the owner or\n25 operator may resample within one month and repeat the analysis for the detected compounds in\n26 accordance with WAC 173-303-645(9)(g)(ii). The resample data will be compared with the control limit.\n27 If resampling confirms statistically significant evidence of contamination, the following actions will be\n28 performed in accordance with WAC 173-303-645(9)(g):\n29 * Notify Ecology in writing within seven days of the finding, indicating which chemical parameters\n30 have shown statistically significant evidence of contamination.\n31 * Sample the groundwater in all monitoring wells and determine if constituents included in Ecology\n32 Publication 97-407, Chemical Testing Methods for Designating Dangerous Waste:\n33 WAC 173-303-090 & -100, Appendix 5, are present, and if so, in what concentration. For any of these\n34 compounds detected, the owner or operator may resample within one month of receiving the results\n35 and repeat the analysis for those compounds detected. If the constituents are detected in the second\n36 analysis, they will form the basis for compliance monitoring.\n37 * If dangerous constituent(s) are detected, submit an application for a Permit modification to Ecology\n38 within 90 days to establish a compliance monitoring program in accordance with\n39 WAC 173-303-645(9)(g)(iv).\n40 * If dangerous constituents are not detected, continue to monitor in accordance with the detection\n41 monitoring program.\nD-24\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 If a source other than LERF caused the contamination or the detection is an artifact caused by an error in\n2 sampling, analysis, or statistical evaluation or natural variation in groundwater (as allowed by\n3 WAC 173-303-645(9)(g)(vi), the following guidelines will apply:\n4 * Notify Ecology in writing within seven days of the finding (i.e., exceedance) and indicate the intent to\n5 make a demonstration to this effect.\n6 * Submit a report to Ecology within 90 days. The report should demonstrate that a source other than the\n7 regulated unit caused the contamination, or that the contamination resulted from an error in sampling,\n8 analysis, evaluation, or natural variation in groundwater chemistry.\n9 * Continue monitoring in accordance with the detection monitoring program.\n10 If it is determined, in accordance with WAC 173-303-645(9)(h), that the detection monitoring program no\n11 longer satisfies the requirements of WAC 173-303-645(9), submit an application to Ecology for a Permit\n12 modification within 90 days to make any appropriate changes to the program.\n13 D4 Compliance-Monitoring Program\n14 Reserved.\n15 D5 Corrective-Action Program\n16 Reserved.\n17 D6 References\n18 40 CFR 265, \"Interim Status Standards for Owners and Operators of Hazardous Waste Treatment,\n19 Storage, and Disposal Facilities,\" Subpart F, \"Ground-Water Monitoring,\" Code ofFederal\n20 Regulations. Available at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2010-title40-vol25/xml/CFR-\n21 201 0-title40-vol25-part265-subpartF.xml.\n22 APHA/AWWA/WEF, 2012, Standard Methods For the Examination of Water and Wastewater,\n23 22nd Edition, American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and\n24 Water Environment Federation, Washington, D.C.\n25 Barker, John A. and John H. Black, 1983, \"Slug Tests in Fissured Aquifers,\" Water Resources Research\n26 19(6):1558-1564. Available at:\n27 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/WR019i006p01558/pdf.\n28 BHI-00 184, 1995, Miocene- to Pliocene-Aged Suprabasalt Sediments of the Hanford Site, South-Central\n29 Washington, Rev. 00, Bechtel Hanford, Inc., Richland, Washington.\n30 Bouwer, Herman and R.C. Rice, 1976, \"A Slug Test for Determining Hydraulic Conductivity of\n31 Unconfined Aquifers With Completely or Partially Penetrating Wells,\" Water Resources\n32 Research 12(3):423-428. Available at:\n33 http://www.cof.orst.edu/cof/fe/watershd/fe538/Watershed 10 HillslopeModule/Bouwer Rice\n34 slug test hydraulic conductivity WRR1976.pdf.\n35 Cooper, H.H. and C.E. Jacob, 1946, \"A Generalized Graphical Method of Evaluating Formation\n36 Constants and Summarizing Well-Field History,\" Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 27(4):526-534.\n37 Available at:\n38 http://core.ecu.edu/geology/spruill/spruill/Groundwater%20Notes%20No.%207.pdf.\nD-25\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nI Cooper, Hilton H., Jr., John D. Bredehoeft, and Istavros S. Papadopulos, 1967, \"Response of a Finite-\n2 Diameter Well to an Instantaneous Charge of Water,\" Water Resources Research\n3 3(1):263-269. Available at:\n4 http://onlinelibrarV.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/WR003i001p00263/pdf\n5 DOE/RL-92-19, 1993, 200 East Groundwater Aggregate Area Management Study Report, Rev. 0,\n6 U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington. Available at:\n7 http://pdw.hanford.fzov/arpir/index.cfm/viewDoc?accession=D 196136305.\n8 DOE/RL-96-61, 1997, Hanford Site Background: Part 3, Groundwater Background, Rev. 0,\n9 U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington. Available at:\n10 http://pdw.hanford.gov/arpir/index.cfm/viewDoc?accession=D197226378.\n11 DOE/RL-2008-01, 2008, Hanford Site Groundwater Monitoring for Fiscal Year 2007, Rev. 0,\n12 U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington. Available at:\n13 http://pdw.hanford.gov/arpir/index.cfm/viewDoc?accession=00098824.\n14 Driscoll, Fletcher G., 1986, Groundwater and Wells, Second Edition, Johnson Division, St. Paul,\n15 Minnesota.\n16 Ecology, EPA, and DOE, 1989, Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, 2 vols., as\n17 amended, Washington State Department of Ecology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,\n18 and U.S. Department of Energy, Olympia, Washington. Available at:\n19 http://www.hanford.gov/?page=8 1.\n20 Ecology Publication 97-407, 2009, Chemical Testing Methods for Designating Dangerous Waste: WAC\n21 173-303-090 & -100, Appendix 5, \"Appendix IX of 40 CFR 264,\" Washington State\n22 Department of Ecology, Olympia, Washington. Available at:\n23 http://www.ecy.wa.gov/pubs/97407.pdf.\n24 EPA 530/R-09-007, 2009, Statistical Analysis of Groundwater Monitoring Data at RCRA Facilities\n25 Unified Guidance, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, U.S. Environmental\n26 Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Available at:\n27 http://www.epa.gov/osw/hazard/correctiveaction/resources/guidance/sitechar/uwstats/unified-\n28 guid.pdf.\n29 EPA-600/4-79-020, 1983, Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, Environmental\n30 Monitoring and Support Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati,\n31 Ohio. Available at: http://pdw.hanford.gov/arpir/index.cfm/viewDoc?accession=D196019611.\n32 Hanford Environmental Information System, Hanford Site database, Richland, Washington.\n33 HNF-23142, 2004, Engineering Study for the 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility Secondary Waste\n34 Treatment ofProjected Future Waste Feeds, Rev. 0, Fluor Hanford, Inc., Richland,\n35 Washington.\n36 Hvorslev, M. Juul, 1951, Time Lag and Soil Permeability in Ground-Water Observations, Bulletin No.\n37 36, Waterways Experiment Station, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Mississippi.\n38 Available at:\n39 http://www.csus.edu/indiv/h/hornert/Geol 210 Summer 2012/Week%203%20readings/Hvor\n40 slev%201951.pdf.\nD-26\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART Ill, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 KGS, 1991, Seismic-Reflection Processing Demonstration Using Eavesdropper, Open-File Report 91-27,\n2 Kansas Geological Survey, Lawrence, Kansas. Available at:\n3 http://www.kgs.ku.edu/Geophysics/Reports2/EavesTutorial.pdf.\n4 Moench, Allen F., 1997, \"Flow to a well of finite diameter in a homogeneous, anisotropic water table\n5 aquifer,\" Water Resources Research 33(6):1397-1407. Available at:\n6 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/97WR00651/pdf.\n7 Neuman, Shlomo P., 1974, \"Effect of Partial Penetration on Flow in Unconfined Aquifers Considering\n8 Delayed Gravity Response,\" Water Resources Research 10(2):303-312. Available at:\n9 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/WR010i002p00303/abstract.\n10 PNNL-12261, 2000, Revised Hydrogeology for the Suprabasalt Aquifer System, 200-East Area and\n11 Vicinity, Hanford Site, Washington, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland,\n12 Washington. Available at:\n13 http://pdw.hanford.gov/arpir/index.cfm/viewDoc?accession=0906180659.\n14 PNNL- 14804, 2004, Results ofDetailed Hydrologic Characterization Tests Fiscal Year 2003, Pacific\n15 Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington. Available at:\n16 http://www.pnl.gov/main/publications/extemal/technical reports/PNNL-14804.pdf.\n17 PNNL- 19702, 2010, Hydrogeologic Model for the Gable Gap Area, Hanford Site, Pacific Northwest\n18 National Laboratory, Richland, Washington. Available at:\n19 www.pnl.gov/main/publications/extemal/technical reports/PNNL-19702.pdf.\n20 RCW 70.105, \"Hazardous Waste Management,\" Revised Code of Washington, Olympia, Washington.\n21 Available at: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=70.105.\n22 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, 42 USC 6901, et seq. Available at:\n23 http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/inforesources/online/index.htm.\n24 SGW-39344, 2008, Borehole Summary Report for the Installation of RCRA Wells 299-E26-77 (C6455),\n25 299-E26-79 (C6826), 299-E25-236 (C6542) and 199-N-165 (C6693), FY2008, Rev. 0, CH2M\n26 HILL Plateau Remediation Company, Richland, Washington. Available at:\n27 http://pdw.hanford.gov/arpir/index.cfm/viewDoc?accession=0906180658.\n28 SGW-41072, 2009, Liquid Effluent Retention Facility Characterization Report, Rev. 0, CH2M HILL\n29 Plateau Remediation Company, Richland, Washington. Available at:\n30 http://pdw.hanford.gov/arpir/index.cfm/viewDoc?accession=0906160165.\n31 SGW-43746, 2009, Landstreamer/Gimbaled GeoPhone Acquisition of High Resolution Seismic\n32 Reflection Data North of the 200 Areas -Hanford Site, Rev. 0, CH2M HILL Plateau\n33 Remediation Company, Richland, Washington. Available at:\n34 http://www.osti.gov/scitech/servlets/purl/968021.\n35 SGW-51467, 2012, Borehole Summary Report for the Installation of Two RCRA Groundwater\n36 Monitoring Wells in the 200 Areas, FY2011, Rev. 0, CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation\n37 Company, Richland, Washington.\n38 SGW-52162, 2012, Seismic Reflection Investigation at the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility, 200 East\n39 Area, Hanford Site Richland, Washington, Rev. 0, CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation\n40 Company, Richland, Washington.\nD-27\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1 SGW-52467, 2012, Integrated Surface Geophysical Investigation Results at Liquid Effluent Retention\n2 Facility, 200 East Area, Hanford, Washington, Rev. 0, CH2M HILL Plateau Remediation\n3 Company, Richland, Washington.\n4 SGW-54508, WMA C September 2012 Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Report, Rev. 0, CH2M HILL\n5 Plateau Remediation Company, Richland, Washington. Available at:\n6 http://pdw.hanford.gov/arpir/index.cfm/viewDoc?accession=0089297.\n7 SW-846, 2007, Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition;\n8 Final Update IV-B, as amended, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response,\n9 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Available at:\n10 http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/testmethods/sw846/online/index.htm.\n11 Theis, C. V., 1935, \"The Relation Between the Lowering of the Piezometric Surface and the Rate and\n12 Duration of Discharge of a Well Using Ground-Water Storage,\" American Geophysical Union\n13 Transactions 16(2):519-524.\n14 WAC 173-303-090, \"Dangerous Waste Regulations,\" \"Dangerous Waste Characteristics,\" Washington\n15 Administrative Code, Olympia, Washington. Available at:\n16 http://apps.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=173-303-090.\n17 WAC 173-303-645, \"Dangerous Waste Regulations,\" \"Releases from Regulated Units,\" Washington\n18 Administrative Code, Olympia, Washington. Available at:\n19 http://apps.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=173-303-645.\n20 Water-Resources Investigation Report 91-4034, 1991, U.S. Geological Survey Toxic Substances\n21 Hydrology Program-Proceedings of the technical meeting, Monterey, California, March\n22 11-15, 1991, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia. Available at:\n23 http://pubs.usus.gov/wri/ 991/4034/report.pdf.\n24 WHC-MR-0235, 1990, Borehole Completion Data Package for the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility,\n25 Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.\n26 WHC-SD-EN-EV-024, 1994, Site Characterization Report for the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility,\n27 Rev. 0, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington. Available at:\n28 http://pdw.hanford.gov/arpir/index.cfm/viewDoc?accession=D 196090383.\n29 WHC-SD-W105-SAR-001, 1991, Final Safety Analysis Report 242-A Evaporator Liquid Effluent\n30 Retention Facility, Rev. 0, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington.\nD-28\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nTable D-1. Constituent Results for 242-A Process Condensate Characterization Results and Basin 42 Characterization Results\nRegional\nProces Process Process Process Groundwater\nBasin 42 Condensate Condensate Condensate Condensate Background\nSample Location 2009 Basin 42 Characterization Results Averageb to LERFY Cold Run' to LERFY to LERE' Concentrationd Constituents\nSample Date Units Wtd Avg' Maxb 2009-2010 6/16/2009 8/31/2010 10/5/2010 Units\nVolume gal 6.76E+06 6.87E+06 5.19E+06 5.36E+05 3.14E+05 3.61E+05 3.61E+05\nNitrogen in ammonium mg/L 111.41 140.00 127 140 0.02 26.3 22.1 NL mg/L Nitrogen in ammonium\nBromide mg/L 0.07 U 0.09 U 0.09 U 0.05 U 0.05 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.151 mg/L Bromide\nChloride mg/L 5.37 7.75 6.91 0.04 U 1.30 0.04 U 0.04 U 19.58 mg/L Chloride\nFluoride mg/L 0.05 0.06 0.05 U 0.03 U 0.03 0.06 0.04 U 1.298 mg/L Fluoride\nNitrogen in Nitrate mg/L 0.08 0.10 0.09 0.03 U 0.12 0.0097 U 0.01 9.42 mg/L Nitrogen in Nitrate\nNitrogen in Nitrite mg/L 0.03 U 0.04 U 0.03 U 0.02 U 0.02 0.02 U 0.02 U 0.045 mg/L Nitrogen in Nitrite\nPhosphorus in phosphate mg/L 0.19 0.27 0.22 0.07 U 0.07 0.07 U 0.07 U 0.072 mg/L Phosphorus in phosphate\nSulfate mg/L 55.36 80.20 71.50 0.07 U 10.10 0.08 U 0.08 U 54.95 mg/L Sulfate\nAluminum pg/L 17.78 U 34.00 U 17.00 U 34 U 0.15 19 U 19 U 170 Vg/L Aluminum\nAntimony pg/L 0.29 U 0.30 U 0.30 U 0.3 U 0.3 U 0.3 U 69.8 pg/L Antimony\nArsenic pg/L 3.59 5.20 4.55 0.4 U 0.60 0.4 U 0.4 U 11.8 pg/L Arsenic\nBarium pg/L 9.43 12.30 10.90 8 U 4 U 4 U 149 pg/L Barium\nBeryllium vg/L 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U 3.38 pg/L Beryllium\nCadmium pg/L 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.10 U 0.1 U 0.10 0.1 U 0.1 U 1.29 pg/L Cadmium\nCalcium pg/L 10,691.93 14,400.00 12830.00 78 U 18000.00 27 U 27 U 58389 pg/L Calcium\nChromium pg/L 5.52 7.90 7.06 0.5 U 0.09 0.5 U 0.5 U 3.17 pg/L Chromium\nCobalt pg/L 4.13 U 8.00 U 4.00 U 8 U 4 U 4 U 1.29 pg/L Cobalt\nCopper pg/L 4.60 6.96 5.30 4.52 0.74 0.469 2.04 1.04 tg/L Copper\nCyanide pg/L 3.81 U 4.00 U 4.00 U 4 U 4 U 4 U 9.52 pg/L Cyanide\nIron pg/L 51.87 58.10 49.50 36 U 150.00 38 U 38 U 1104 pg/L Iron\nLead Vg/L 1.33 9.01 0.30 9.01 1.60 3.52 2.32 1.3 pg/L Lead\nD-29\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nTable D-1. Constituent Results for 242-A Process Condensate Characterization Results and Basin 42 Characterization Results\nRegional\nProcess Process Process Process Groundwater\nBasin 42 Condensate Condensate Condensate Condensate Background\nSample Location 2009 Basin 42 Characterization Results Averageb to LERF' Cold Run' to LERF' to LERFT Concentrationd Constituents\nSample Date Units Wtd Avga Malb 2009-2010 6/16/2009 8/31/2010 10/5/2010 Units\nMagnesium pg/L 2,533.13 3,380.0 2986.67 32 U 5100.0 14 U 14 U 31051 pg/L Magnesium\nManganese pg/L 5.69 8.00 5.27 8 U 8.00 6 U 6 U 86.4 pg/L Manganese\nMercury pg/L 0.09 0.12 0.11 0.1 0.05 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.006 pg/L Mercury\nNickel pg/L 7.53 10.60 8.40 8 U 0.55 4 U 4 U 1.98 Isg/L Nickel\nPotassium pg/L 1,498.00 2,060.0 1826.67 586 900.00 73 U 73 U 11089 ag/L Potassium\nSelenium ag/L 0.60 0.87 0.69 0.3 U 0.32 0.3 U 0.3 U 20.7 pg/L Selenium\nSilicon sg/L 3,453.02 4,610.0 4120.00 275 5300.0 43 388 43904 1g/L Silicon\nSilver pg/L 5.38 U 10.00 U 5.00 U 10 U 7 U 7 U 5.98 pg/L Silver\nSodium pg/L 18,276.24 26,700.00 23633.33 260 2500.0 11 U 11 U 32919 pg/L Sodium\nThallium Vg/L 43.83 148.00 35.00 U 148 0.02 49 U 49 U 1.87 lig/L Thallium\nTitanium sg/L 4.13 U 8.00 U 4.00 U 8 U 4 U 4 U 30 pg/L Titanium\nUranium pg/L 8.54 13.40 11.12 0.05 U 0.05 U 0.05 U 14.4 pg/L Uranium\nVanadium sg/L 2.93 U 24.00 U 12.00 U 24 U 17 U 17 U 19.3 pg/L Vanadium\nZinc ag/L 12.93 17.60 14.97 12 U 1.40 4 U 4 U 48.9 pg/L Zinc\nSpecific Conductance VS/cm 430.52 583.00 533.00 113 168.00 45.1 42.6 TBD PS/cm Specific Conductance\npH Measurement unitless 9.65 10.40 9.65 10.4 8.20 9.87 9.54 TfID unitless pH Measurement\nAlkalinity mg/L 490.00 500.00 473.33 ND 71.20 ND ND 156367 mg/L Alkalinity\nTotal dissolved solids mg/L 113.17 162.00 136.33 10 U 100.00 31 27 277190 mg/L Total dissolved solids\nTotal suspended solids mg/L 2.49 10.00 2.20 2 U 10 U 2 U mg/L Total suspended solids\nTotal organic carbon mg/L 7.10 9.59 7.69 9.59 3.78 4.39 TBD mg/L Total organic carbon\n1-Butanol pg/L 287.66 1,700.0 163.33 680 1700 330 0 pg/L 1-Butanol\n2-Butanone sg/L 6.17 10.00 6.83 8.0 4.4 1 U 0 1g/L 2-Butanone\n2-Pentanone ag/L 3.34 5.70 3.70 1 U 5.7 2.1 0 pg/L 2-Pentanone\nAcetone sg/L 220.09 1,700.0 83.33 1700 260 140 0 pg/L Acetone\nD-30\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nTable D-1. Constituent Results for 242-A Process Condensate Characterization Results and Basin 42 Characterization Results\nRegional\nProcess Process Process Process Groundwater\nBasin 42 Condensate Condensate Condensate Condensate Background\nSample Location 2009 Basin 42 Characterization Results Averageh to LERFe Cold Rune to LERF' to LERF ConcentratiOad Constituents\nSample Date Units Wid Avg Maxb 2009-2010 6/16/2009 8/31/2010 10/5/2010 Units\nBenzene pg/L 0.95 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 t .0 U 1.0 U 0 pg/L Benzene\nCarbon tetrachloride pg/L 0.95 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 0 pg/L Carbon tetrachloride\nChloroform pg/L 0.95 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 1.0 U 0 pg/L Chloroform\nMethylene chloride pg/L 1.16 1.60 1.27 l U I U I U 0 ag/L Methylene chloride\nTetrahydrofuran pg/L 36.89 84.00 30.33 74 84 61 0 pg/L Tetrahydrofuran\n2-B3utoxyethanol pg/L 50.95 330.00 18.33 220 34 330 0 pg/L 2-Butoxyethanol\n2-Methylphenol (cresol,\n2-Methylphenol (cresol, o-) lug/L 1.26 4.30 1.00 0.8 U 3.8 4.3 0 pg/L o-)\nBenzyl alcohol pg/L 3.06 23.00 0.70 23 6.7 6.4 0 pg/L Benzyl alcohol\nn-Nitrosodimethylamine pg/L 176.61 290.00 190.00 290 67 79 0 pg/L n-Nitrosodimethylamine\nTotal cresols pg/L 0.95 4.30 0.60 U 0.5 U 4.3 4.2 0 pg/1. Total cresols\nTributyl phosphate pg/L 47.73 72.00 62.00 0.5 U I U I U 0 pg/L Tributyl phosphate\nFormate pCi/L 0.00 U 0.01 ND U 0.00467 U 0.00467 U 0.00629 0 pCi/L Formate\nGross alpha pCilL 136.24 190.00 176.67 4.7 0.60 2.3 U 2.3 U 0 pCi/L Gross alpha\nGross beta pCi/L 23,218.16 34,000.00 30000.00 930 2.80 2100 140 4.15 pCi/L Gross beta\nNote: Spreadsheet data were provided by Effluent Treatment Facility personnel.\na. Weighted average for Basin 42 based on samples collected in Risers 2, 4, and 7 from June 2009. August 2010, and October 2010, respectively.\nb. Maximum and average results are derived from the three sample dates June 2009, August 2010, and October 2010.\nc. Process condensate results are associated with characterization results collected at 242-A Evaporator.\nd. Results based on Hanford Site Background: Part 3, Groandwater Background (DOERL-96-61).\ngal = gallons\nmg/L milligrams per liter\npg/L micrograms per liter\npS/cm = microSiemens per centimeter\nu= less than detection\nWtd Ave = weighted average\nD-31\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1\n2 This page intentionally left blank.\nD-32\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nTable D-2. Basin 43 Constituent Characterization Results for Past 200-UP-1 and 200-ZP-1 Groundwater Waste Streams\nand Recent Waste Characterization Results For Basin 43\n200-UP-I and Basin 43 200-BP-5\n200-ZP-l Characterization ERDF Perched\nConstituent Units Groundwater' Results Leachated Water'\nVolume gal 7.03E+7b 9.13E+05\nAdded Vol. gal 1.26E+06 5.62E+05 2.36E+04\nAmmonium (N) mg/L 0.064 0.1 0.1\nBromide mg/L 0.4 1.2 1.5 1.2\nChloride mg/L 22.1 176.9 224.0 83.7\nFluoride mg/L 2.7 1.2 0.2 22\nNitrate (N) mg/L 101 63.8 64.6 219.7\nNitrite (N) mg/L 0.036 U 3.4 U 7.6 U 0.2 U\nPhosphate (P) mg/L 0.12 U 0.2 U 0.3 U 0.3\nSulfate mg/L 57.2 404.4 597.0 556.4\nAluminum pg/L 44 17.5 19.7 U 125\nAntimony lcg/L 0.3 U 3.3 U 6.0 U 31 U\nArsenic tg/L 5.5 6.9 7.7 7.5\nBarium gg/L 71.1 96.7 129.1 62.1\nBeryllium pg/L 0.05 U 0.8 U 1.3 U 3 U\nCadmium pg/L 0.1 U 0.5 0.3 4.4\nCalcium pg/L 56861.5 181161.2 248000.0 167000\nChromium pg/L 121.1 36.1 29.2 143.9\nCobalt ag/L 4 U 67.7 145.0 9\nCopper Rg/L 0.15 121.1 145.0 21.7\nHexavalent\nChromium 4g/L 113\nIron pg/L 18 U 21.2 14.3 130.4\nLead pg/L 0.1 U 5.1 10.9\nMagnesium pg/L 18361.5 44035.4 53750.0 71300\nManganese pg/L 4 U 7.1 6.9 129.7\nMercury ag/L 0.05 U 0.1 0.2 U\nNickel og/L 4 U 6.7 6.3 19.9 U\nPotassium pg/L 5536.2 13579.6 17138.0 10100\nSelenium ag/L 4.8 5.7 8.0\nSilicon pg/L 21300 17465.4 21750.0\nSilver pg/L 5 U 5.5 5.0 33 U\nSodium pg/L 161846.2 187496.6 191250.0 391000\nThallium pg/L 36 U 27.7 5.0 U\nTitanium ag/L 4 U 4.4 4.0\nUranium ag/L 25.6 2249.2 1100.6 43500\nVanadium ag/L 38.5 32.9 45.1 17.4\nZinc pg/L 37.5 25.5 27.2 92.2\nSpecific\nConductance PS/cm 1206.2 2041.7 2483.8 2592\npH Measurement unitless 7.95 6.9 7.8 7.7\nAlkalinity mg/L 151 224.9 296.0 231\nTotal dissolved\nsolids mg/L 906.8 1351.1 1688.8\nTotal suspended\nsolids mg/L 1.62 9.7 19.4\nTotal organic\ncarbon mg/L 0.64 6.0 6.4\nCarbon(D\ntetrachloride pg/L 490.7 12.1 5.0 U 1.0 U\nChloroform pg/L 8.5 0.6 U 1.0 U\nTetrahydrofuran pg/L 2 U 1.1 U 1.0 U\nGross alpha pCilL 29.4 1510.2 587.6 38800\nGross beta pCi/L 2830.8 8065.1 394.8 34600 -0\na. 200-UP-1 and 200-ZP-1 Average Groundwater Characterization Results Based on up to 14 samples collected between 2008 and 2011.\nb. Total volume of 200-UP-1 and 200-ZP-1 groundwater received between 2008 and 2011.\nc. Characterization results of the Basin 43 after removal of the 200-UP-1 and 200-ZP-1 groundwater from the basin. Z\nd. Represents the dominant waste stream for Basin 43 since 200-UP-1 and 200-ZP-1 groundwater transfers have ceased (2012 total gallons to\nBasin 43 were 2,770,000). z\ne. Represents the third most dominant waste stream received at Basin43 (2012 total gallons to Basin 43 were 130,000).\nNotes: The second and fourth dominant waste streams were MODU-Tanks and Hanford purge water (2012 total gallons to Basin 43 were x\n291,500), which are the same streams and contain significantly less contaminant concentrations than the ERDF leachate and 200-BP-5 -\nperched water. Spreadsheet data were provided by Effluent Treatment Facility Personnel.\n00\n-n4X\n WA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3MONTH YEAR\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nThis page intentionally left blank.\no\n10\nD-3\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nTable D-3. ERDF Leachate\nAverage\nConcentration Regional\nbetween February Groundwater\n2000 and Background\nCAS # Constituent September 2012 Units Concentration* Units\n7429-90-5 Aluminum 31 gg/L 170 gg/L\n7440-36-0 Antimony I gg/L 69.8 gg/L\n7440-38-2 Arsenic 9 gg/L 11.8 pg/L\n7440-39-3 Barium 97 gg/L 149 pg/L\nBeryllium 0 gg/L 3.38 pg/L\n7440-70-2 Calcium 213,735 gg/L 58,389 pg/L\n7440-47-3 Chromium 27 gg/L 3.17 gg/L\n7440-50-8 Copper 20 gg/L 1.04 ig/L\n7439-89-6 Iron 35 tg/L 1,104 tg/L\n7439-92-1 Lead 2.8 tg/L 1.3 gg/L\n7439-95-4 Magnesium 69,580 tg/L 31,051 pg/L\n7440-02-0 Nickel 13 ptg/L 1.98 jig/L\n7440-09-7 Potassium 20,573 jig/L 11,089 pg/L\n7782-49-2 Selenium 5 pg/L 20.7 ptg/L\n7440-21-3 Silicon 20,063 gg/L 43,904 pg/L\n7440-23-5 Sodium 254,237 gg/L 32,919 pg/L\n7440-31-5 Tin 1 gg/L 23.6 pg/L\nThallium 0 gg/L 1.87 pg/L\n7440-62-2 Vanadium 26 jig/L 19.3 pg/L\n7440-66-6 Zinc 14 jtg/L 48.9 pg/L\n56-23-5 Carbon Tetrachloride 0 gg/L 0 pg/L\n67-56-1 Trichloroethene 0 gg/L 0 jig/L\n75-69-4 Methyl Alcohol 0 tg/L 0 pg/L\nTrichlorofluoromethane 3.2 pg/L 0 pg/L\npH pH 7 to 8 unitless TBD unitless\nCONDUCT Specific Conductance 2509 jimS/cm TBD jimS/cm\n24959-67-9 Bromide 1242 gg/L 151 [g/L\nD-35\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nTable D-3. ERDF Leachate\nAverage\nConcentration Regional\nbetween February Groundwater\n2000 and Background\nCAS # Constituent September 2012 Units Concentration* Units\n16887-00-6 Chloride 249,638 pg/L 19,580 pg/L\n16984-48-8 Fluoride 521 pg/L 1,298 pg/L\n14797-55-8 Nitrate 327,241 pg/L 41,723 pg/L\n14797-65-0 Nitrite 500U pg/L 130 pg/L\n14808-79-8 Sulfate 473,776 gg/L 54,950 pg/L\nTOC Total Organic Carbon 13,148 pg/L TBD pg/L\nOIL/GREASE Oil and Grease 3,213 pg/L 0 pg/L\nTDS Total Dissolved Solids 1,926,897 pg/L TBD pg/L\nTSS Total Suspended Solids 15,686 pg/L TBD pg/L\n12587-46-1 Alkalinity 264,813 pg/L 156,367 gg/L\n12587-47-2 Gross alpha 965 pCi/L 0 pCi/L\n14762-75-5 Gross beta 643 pCi/L 4.15 pCi/L\n* Results are based on Hanford Site Background: Part 3, Groundwater Background (DOE/RL-96-6 1).\nNote: Spreadsheet data were provided by Effluent Treatment Facility personnel.\nTBD = to be determined\nD-36\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nTable D-4. LERF Well Attributes\nWells 299-E26-9 299-E26-10 299-E26-II 299-E26-14 299-E26-77 299-E26-79 299-E35-2\nDate Drilled August, 1990 August, 1990 August, 1990 September, 2011 October, 2008 September, 2008 August, 1990\nTop of Casing Elevation (m/ft) 184.854/606.48 184.418/605.05 183.88/603.281 183.224/601.129 184.782/606.24 183.115/600.771 184.611/605.679\nGround Surface Elevation (m/ft) 183.941/603.48 183.512/602.07 182.979/600.325 182.494/598.734 184.011/603.371 182.356/598.281 183.712/602.73\nTotal Depth Drilled (m/ft) 61.722/202.5 62.972/206.6 61.417/201.5 73.334/240.6 70.957/232.8 68.507/224.76 61.661/202.3\nElevation ofTotal Depth Drilled (n/fl) 122.219/400.98 120,54/395.47 121.562/398.825 109.16/358.134 113.054/370.571 113.849/373.521 122.051/400.43\nDepth to Top of Basalt (m/ft) 61.271/201.02 62.271/204.3 60.35/198 67.361/221 62.636/205.5 63.094/207 60.991/200.1\nTop of Basalt Elevation (m/ft) 122.67/402.46 121.241/397.77 122.629/402.325 115.133/377.734 121.375/397.871 119.262/391.281 122.722/402.63\nBottom of Sump Elevation (m/ft) None None None 115.773/379.834 114.334/374.771 114.325/375.081 None\nBentonite Pellets/\nFill Below Bottom of Sump/Screen 20-40 Sand 20-40 Sand 20-40 Sand 10-20 Sandd 10-20 Sand 10-20 Sand 20-40 Sand\nBottom of Screen Elevation (m/ft) 122.707/402.58 120.693/395.97 120.251/394.525 116.688/382.834 115.248/377.771 115.239/378.081 122.295/401.23\nTop of Screen Elevation (m/ft) 125.937/413.18 125.448/411.57 121.958/400.125 122.784/402.834 122.792/402.521 122.859/403.081 125.526/411.83\nSand Pack 20-40 Sand 20-40 Sand 20-40 Sand 10-20 Sand 10-20 Sand 10-20 Sand 20-40 Sand\nWater Table Elevation After Drilling (m/ft) 124.444/408.28' 124.594/408.773b 125.097/410.425' 121.922/400' 121.987/400.22' 121.976/400.1849 124.611/408.83h\nWater Table Elevation 4/10/2013 (m/ft) Dry 121.81/399.639 122.602/402.238 121.878/399.862 121.825/399.688 121.808/399.633 Dry\nWater Height Across Screen 4/10/2013 (m/ft) Dry 1.117/3.67 2.351/7.713 5.19/17.028 6.577/21.917 6.569/24.552 Dry\nWater above Basalt 4/10/2013 (m/ft) Dry 0.569/1.87 None 6.745/22.128 0.45/1.817 2.546/8.352 Dry\nRingold Present No No Yes Yes No Yes Yes'\nDepth to Top of Ringold (m/fl) NA NA 57.607/189 65.532/215 NA 62.789/206 Not Provided\nTop of Ringold Elevation (m/ft) NA NA 125.372/411.325 116.962/383.734 NA 119.567/392.281 Uncertain\nThickness of Ringold Across Screen 4/10/2013 (m/ft) NA NA NA 0.274/0.9 NA 0.3048/1 Uncertain\nBest Estimate of Hydraulic Conductivity (m/day) 6 to 120 36.2 to 42.8 6.3 27.3 134 39.7\na. Date 8/1/1990\nb. Date 9/4/1990\nc. Date 8/13/1990\nd. Bentonite pellets to 0.7 ft below bottom of sump\ne. Date 12/29/2011\nf. Date 11/26/2008\ng. Date 11/26/2008\nh. Date 8/2/1990\ni. Basis: WHC-SD-EN-EV-024, Ste Characterization Reportfor the Liquidliffluent Retention Facility\nNA -not applicable\nD-37\n DOEIRL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nTable D-5. LERF Groundwater Gradient and Magnitude Calculations\nDecember, 2011 February, 2012 April, 2012 August, 2012 September, 2012 November, 2012 December, 2012 January, 2013\nNew RP, Gyro New RP, Gyro New RP, Gyro New RP, Gyro New RP, Gyro New RP, Gyro New RP, Gyro New RP, Gyro\nCorrection & BP Correction & BP Correction & BP Correction & BP Correction & BP Correction & BP Correction & BP Correction & BP\nWell Name Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment Adjustment\n299-E26-10 121.838 121.834 121.816 121.808 121.809 121.828 121.830 121.825\n299-E26-14 121.911 121.895 121.890 121.878 121.878 121.898 121.899 121.891\n299-E26-77 121.844 121.843 121.824 121.820 121.822 121.839 121.841 121.835\n299-E26-79 121.847 121.835 121.818 121.813 121.816 121.830 121.837 121.839\nRange (mn): 0.073 0.061 0.074 0.070 0.069 0.070 0.069 0.066\nGradient Magnitude (rn/m): 2.75E-04 2.49E-04 2.98E-04 2.77E-04 2.69E-04 2.85E-04 2.67E-04 2.39E-04\nDirection (azimuth): 195 186 188 188 189 186 190 198\nR^2: 0.92 0.93 0.91 0.94 0.95 0.93 0.94 0.96\np-Value: 0.2858 0.2670 0.2928 0.2348 0.2132 0.2569 0.2355 0.2071\nStatistically Significant?: No No No No No No No No\nRP = Reference Point\nBP = Barometric Pressure\nIn order to minimize the measurement error associated with the monitoring network, steps were taken that included deviation correction from vertical of the well bore, barometric corrections completed within each well and correlated with barometric conditions measured at weather station in 200\nAreas; precision geodetic surveys to a common benchmark dedicated e-tape measurements for depth-to-groundwater from the dedicated point associated with the precision survey at each well; dedicated person for measuring water levels all groundwater level measurements completed on same\nday per month. Further discussion on these corrections is provided in Calculations in Support ofthe Low Hydraulic Gradient Evaluation Sudyfor the 200 East Area UwonfinedAquifer (ECF-200EAST-12-0086).\nAfter these corrections have been applied, a least square regression of the plane to elevations associated with the well locations is completed to derive the gradient. The gradient, azimuth, R2 ratio, the p-value are provided in the lower part of the table. Briefly, the R2 ratio is the goodness of fit\ncoefficient. Basically, it is the ratio of the sum of squares because of the regression to the total sum of squares. If the ratio of the two sums is close to 1, indicating unity, then the fit is considered good. Likewise, the p-value is the probability that the degree of an apparent spatially dependent trend\nobserved in the data (or a trend of even greater degree) would occur solely by random chance. Thus, if the p-value is less than 0.05, the fitted trend surface is deemed statistically significant. Again, further details of this process calculation are provided in ECF-200EAST-12-0086.\nD-38\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nTable D-6. Geochemical Constituent Evaluation for Groundwater\nConstituent Sample Frequency Comment\n* Major anions\n* Major cations Semiannually Aid geochemical evaluation\n* Alkalinity\n1\nTable D-7. Dangerous Constituents and Indicators to be Analyzed as Indicators of Groundwater\nContamination at the LERF Basins\nConstituent Sample Frequency Comment\n* Carbon tetrachloride Samples collected semiannually for Subject to statistical evaluation,\n* pH detection monitoring, based on the standard sampling\n* Specific conductance plan outlined in\n* Total organic carbon W C1333658()i n WAC 173-303-645(8)(g)(i) and\nWAC 173-303-645(8)(h)(i).\n* Total organic halides Analyze hexavalent chromium as\npotential indicator parameter.\nSource: WAC 173-303-645, -Dangerous Waste Regulations,\" \"Releases from Regulated Units.\"\nNotes: Wells 299-E26-14 and 299-E26-79 are sampled as upgradient and downgradient compliance wells semiannually.\nWell 299-E26-77 will be sampled semiannually for geochemical and field parameters, but not used for background calculations.\n2\nTable D-8. Quality Control Samples\nSample Type Primary Characteristics Evaluated Frequency\nField Quality Control\nFull trip blank Contamination from containers or One per 20 well trips\ntransportation\nField transfer blank Airborne contamination from the One each day volatile organic\nsampling site compound samples are collected\nEquipment blank Contamination from non-dedicated As neededa\nsampling equipment\nDuplicate samples Reproducibility One per 20 well trips\nLaboratory Quality Control\nMethod blank Laboratory contamination One per batch\nLaboratory duplicates Laboratory reproducibility b\nbMatrix spike Matrix effects and laboratory accuracy\nMatrix spike duplicate Laboratory reproducibility and b\nD-39\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nTable D-8. Quality Control Samples\nSample Type Primary Characteristics Evaluated Frequency\naccuracy\nSurrogates Recovery/yield b\nLaboratory control sample Method accuracy One per batch\na. For portable Grundfos pumps, equipment blanks are collected 1 per 10 well trips. Whenever a new type of non-dedicated\nequipment is used, an equipment blank is collected every time sampling occurs until it can be shown that less frequent\ncollection of equipment blanks is adequate to monitor the decontamination procedure for the non-dedicated equipment.\nb. As defined in the laboratory contract or quality assurance plan and/or analysis procedures.\nTable D-9. Preservation Techniques, Analytical Methods Used, and Current Required Quantitation Limits for\nChemical Constituents\nMethod\nQuantitation Limit\nConstituent Collection & Preservationab Analysis Methods' (g/L)\nMetals\nCalcium 1,000\nMagnesium SW-846e Method 6010,or 750\nPotassium EPA/600 Method 200.8 4,000\nSodium 500\nAnions by Ion Chromatography\nNitrate 250\nSulfate 500\nP,none EPA/600 Method 300.O\nChloride 200\nNitrite 250\nVolatile Organics\nCarbon Tetrachloride G, no headspace SW-846 8260 2\nTotal Organic Halides\nTotal Organic Carbon G, no headspace SW-846 9060A 140\nTotal Organic Halides\nTotal Organic Halides G, no headspace SW-846 9020B 20\nHexavalent Chromium\nHexavalent Chromium , none EPA/7196A 10\nAlkalinity\nD-40\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART Ill, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nTable D-9. Preservation Techniques, Analytical Methods Used, and Current Required Quantitation Limits for\nChemical Constituents\nMethod\nQuantitation Limit\nConstituent Collection & Preservationab Analysis Methodsc (pgfL)d\nEPA Standard Method' 2320\nAlkalinity G/P, none EPA/600 Method 310.1 5,000\nEPA/600 Method 310.2\na. P = plastic; G = glass.\nb. All samples will be cooled to 4oC upon collection.\nc. Constituents grouped together are analyzed by the same method, unless otherwise indicated.\nd. Detection limit units, except where indicated.\ne. SW-846, Methods for Evaluation ofSolid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods, Third Edition; Final Update IV-B.\nf. Analytical method adapted from Method 300.0, Test Methods for Determination of Inorganic Anions in Water by Ion\nChromatography (EPA-600/4-84-017).\ng. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (APHA /AWWA/WEF, 2012).\nEPA = U.S. Environmental Protection Agency\nN/A = not applicable\nTable D-10. Field and Laboratory Quality Control Elements and Acceptance Criteria\nConstituent\" QC Element Acceptance Criteria Corrective Action\nGeneral Chemical Parameters\nMB <MDL Flagged with \"C\"\nLCS 80-120% recoveryc Data reviewedd\nDUP <20% RPDc Data reviewedd\nAlkalinity\nMSe 75-125% recoveryc Flagged with \"N\"\nEB, FTB <2 times MDL Flagged with \"Q\"\nField duplicate <20% RPDf Flagged with \"Q\"\nAnions\nMB <MDL Flagged with \"C\"\nLCS 80-120% recoveryc Data reviewedd\nDUP <20% RPDC Data reviewedd\nAnions by IC\nMS 75-125% recoveryc Flagged with \"N\"\nEB, FTB <2 times MDL Flagged with \"Q\"\nField duplicate <20% RPDf Flagged with \"Q\"\nD-41\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nTable D-10. Field and Laboratory Quality Control Elements and Acceptance Criteria\nConstituenta QC Element Acceptance Criteria Corrective Action\nMetals\nMB <CRDL Flagged with \"C\"\nLCS 80-120% recoveryc Data reviewedd\nMS 75-125% recoveryc Flagged with \"N\"\nICP metals\nMSD <20% RPDc Data reviewedd\nEB, FTB <2 times MDL Flagged with \"Q\"\nField duplicate <20% RPDf Flagged with \"Q\"\nVolatile Organic Compounds\nMB <MDL Flagged with \"B\"\nLCS Statistically derived Data reviewed\nMS Statistically derived Flagged with \"N\"\nCarbon tetrachloride MSD Statistically derived Data reviewedd\nSUR Statistically derived Data reviewedd\nEB, FTB, FXR <2 times MDL Flagged with \"Q\"\nField duplicate <20% RPDf Flagged with \"Q\"\nHexavalent Chromium\nMB <2 times MDL Flagged with \"B\"\nLCS Statistically derived Data reviewed\nMS Statistically derived Flagged with \"N\"\nHexavalent Chromium MSD Statistically derived Data reviewedd\nSUR Statistically derived Data reviewedd\nEB, FTB <2 times MDL Flagged with \"Q\"\nField duplicate <20% RPDf Flagged with \"Q\"\nD-42\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART Ill, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nTable D-1 0. Field and Laboratory Quality Control Elements and Acceptance Criteria\nConstituent\" QC Element Acceptance Criteria Corrective Action.\na. Refer to Table D-7 for specific analytical methods.\nc. Laboratory-determined, statistically derived control limits may also be used. Such limits are reported with the data.\nd. After review, corrective actions are determined on a case-by-case basis. Corrective actions may include a laboratory\nrecheck or flagging the data as suspect (\"Y\" flag) or rejected (\"R\" flag).\ne. Applies to total organic carbon and total organic halides only.\nf. Applies only in cases where one or both results are greater than 5 times the detection limit.\ng. Determined by the laboratory based on historical data. Control limits are reported with the data.\nData flags:\nB, C = possible laboratory contamination (analyte was detected in the associated method blank)\nN = result may be biased (associated matrix spike result was outside the acceptance limits)\nQ = problem with associated field QC sample (blank and/or duplicate results were out of limits)\nAbbreviations:\nCRDL = contract-required detection limit\nDUP = laboratory matrix duplicate\nEB = equipment blank\nFTB = full trip blank\nFXR = field transfer blank\nGC = gas chromatography\nICP = inductively coupled plasma\nLCS = laboratory control sample\nMB = method blank\nMDL = method detection limit\nMS = matrix spike\nMSD = matrix spike duplicate\nQC = quality control\nRPD = relative percent difference\nSUR = surrogate\nTable D-11. Blind-Standard Constituents and Schedule\nConstituents Frequency Accuracy (%)a Precision (% RSD)2\nCarbon Tetrachloride Quarterly ±25% <25%\nTotal Organic Halidesb Quarterly ±25% <25%\na. If the results are less than 5 times the required detection limit, then the criterion is that the difference of the results of the\nreplicates is less than the required detection limit.\nb. Two sets of spikes for total organic halides will be used. The spiking compound for one set should be 2,4,\n5-trichlorophenol. The spiking compound for the second set should include the constituents used for the volatile organic\ncompounds sample (carbon tetrachloride).\nRSD = relative standard deviation\nD-43\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nr. *X\nAe\n1042 Fiur D LRoio MapF\nD-413\n2 Figure D-1. LERF Location Map\nD-44\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n46-46\n[1\nE352 E2614(WLUG)\nGroundwater\nFlow\nE 6-77L',.) Basin Basin Basin E26-11LERF 42 43 44\nE226410(WL) E2 6 -4 k#V 0\n* RCRA Moratoring *l Factuty\nFormer RCRA Vel Vaste Site\nDecommissioned Wer Orational Area\nWal prefix 29 9-or '899- omd*ied Basal Above Water Table\nWell Label = V41name (Type)\nWL VWaer Level ________\nSDowngradent\nUG Upgradient\n1\n2 Figure D-2. LERF Well and Facility Description Map\nD-45\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1\n2 This page intentionally left blank.\nD-46\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. O\nWA7890008967, PART 1II, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nLRSURVEYS\n/ FY201 Geohysical Profiles\n(SW511/SGW-52162)\n/2008 Seismic Profiles\n/(SGW-39766 / SGW-42313)\nSWIP: FY-79 Seismic Profile\n(SSC 1979 I SGW-42313)\n(Dashed. missing section)\nB asalt Wia (With elervation (it)\n$Welt (No Basalt. with TD elevation)\nBasalttCntours fearAMSL\n(53f Coturiterval)\nWater Level Appmaimated by\nRed-Dashed Confoot Uine\nGreen Hiactnur f*r bassitL-2Soo\"e water level\nj Scale (meters)\nA\"14\"It-0 200 400 600\nScale (fee)\n0 500 1000 1500 2000\n2 Figure D-3. LERF Location Map Showing Revised Unconfined Aquifer Thickness Based on Geophysical and Previous Borehole Data\nD-47\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n2 This page intentionally left blank.\nD-48\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n299-E34-7, 299-E26-10, 299-E26-77\nSulfate (ug/L)\n* Detect 0 Undetect * 299-E34-7 U 299-E26-10 A 299-E26-77\n680,000\n510,000\n340,000\n170,000\n0\n1986 1993 2000 2007 2014\nYear\n1\n2 Figure D-4. Comparison of Sulfate at Wells 299-E34-7, 299-E26-14, and 299-E26-10\n299-E34-7\nTotal organic carbon (ug/L) vs. Nitrate (ug/L)\n* Detect 0 Undetect -Con 1 0 Con 2\n6,800 160,000\n150,000\n140,000\n130,000\n5,100 120,000\n110,000\n100,000\n90,000\n3,400 80,000\n70,000\n60,000\n50,000\n1,700 40,000\n30,000\n20,000\n10,000\n0 0\n1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014\nYear\n3\n4 Figure D-5. History of Total Organic Carbon and Nitrate at Well 299-E34-7\nD-49\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n299-W10-20\nCarbon tetrachloride (ug/L) vs. Total organic halides (ug/L)\n* Detect 0 UndLetect -Con 1 U Con 2\n2,800 1,600\n1,500\n1,400\n1,300\n2,100 1,200\n1,100 0\n1,000\n900\n1,400 800\n700\n600\n500\n700 400\n300\n200\n100\n0\n190 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014\nYear\n1\n2 Figure D-6. Comparison of Carbon Tetrachloride to Total Organic Halides\n3\n299-W10-20\nCarbon tetrachloride (ug/L) vs, Total organic carbon (ug/L)\n* Detect 0 Undetect -Con 1 0 Con 2\n2,800 2,000\n1,900\n1,800\n1,700\n1,600\n2,100 1,500\n1,400\n1,300 C\n1,200\n1,100\n1,400 1,000\n900\n800\n700\n600\n700 500\n400\n300\n200\n100\n1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014\nYear\n4\n5 Figure D-7. Comparison of Carbon Tetrachloride to Total Organic Carbon\nD-50\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nWest Profile Line 2 East\nSeisric Reflectio, Section\nSeismic Ststions\nI so 100 ISO 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 wo soo 550 700 750 S00 850 0ae\n00 ea200e) o e\n100\n200\n250\n300 ME O\n050 1000 1050 1100 110 1200 1250 1l00 1350 1400 1450 11500 150 1500 10 700 1750\nOMetance (m)\noSe/nm/c Resiscti omograpy Model\n200 200-M36-2 2994828-14 29H61(13 -S.Ah) TOUM-2 TOEM.-0 (9k1 604.0) TDe .-3 r TDEM-. T (135nou1 603th: 1o7..(\n1150 1200 1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500 1550 1e00 150 700 1750\nDistance (m)\n54500418\n0 60 t00 ISO 200 250 300 350 .00 4r0 5100 50 Goo 080 70\nC..115 E20sitiit Md\n12000\n(IS1 SSt) M-2 raa,.Ar (Sm Sooth) TOEMA3 'IDEMiv.6 rOOM-F (135,1 804.0h) VS\n-150\n1 450 12o0 1250 1300 1350 1.400 1.450 1500 I0s0 10M l0go 1 700 1760\nFigure D-8. Seismic Profile North of LERF extending from Well 299-E35-2 to Well 299-E26-11 and Including Well 299-E26-11\nD-51\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n2 This page intentionally left blank.\nD-52\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\naws abov 4 a ter \" OW big\nJ-,~ 1 -v zlw\nMarda Wers d bant of suprobw? S eofspbgt d eevon lsAeF dsie/aePh oar eAnt ($et I.,mMy o~~5.1.s tfl4ftit\n2 Figure D-9. Conceptual Model of Buried Paleochannels Extending Through Gable Gap\n3\nD-53\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1\n2 This page intentionally left blank.\nD-54\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nProfile Line 1 Ea.\nrn4Cm 44\n6 ? 7% v( 0 6C A D *44 loCC 144 IM 1240 lz%, IW4 414 1 444 $ 'a t8if Iwo0 t950 200M .9 214412\n644~4 .5 stdrc Rhfractpon Torrooprphy asdsushm .v^*a m~t restt\n30 ,0r ; 1 $44 14 * 1h% S 41 0 t 2\n400 *,450 004I E 01g aw ox *14 xC 7W % gt% 1 0 )o t 4g ;44 1I'M IWO 0 4 0 M ox I4 t 00 475I IW I 480 4900 1W0 Z\"00 20 2M 0 4421W2041 4ee 'I\n2 Figure D-10. Seismic Profile South of LERF with Focus on Area between Wells 299-E26-10 and 299-E26-11\n3\nD-55\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nI\n2 This page intentionally left blank.\nD-56\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART Ill, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n29999E27425\n4 FiureD-11. hre DiensonalVie frm Est f LRF ookig Wst-ortwes ino te i Column114F\n5\nD-57\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nWel Column\nBasaft\nRnodunit A\n2 Note: The Hanford sediments and groundwater have been removed to portray the basalt surface and\n3 remnant Ringold Formation sediments.\n4 Figure D-12. Three Dimensional View from East of LERF Looking West-Northwest into the Soil Column\n5\nD-58\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nE\nFormation\nName\n1Ad0 -- s..dft -and-,\n170 - near Md -170\n.uddy-Wdy6rm\n160 - -160\narghyoudurawavandHanford\n150t UN nrasy Graes -150\nwiov Grad-14140 -- 14\n130-d- 130\na so -,ingold\n120- 120\nI Mountain\nasun ssanBasalt\n110 - 110\n2 Figure D-13. West to East Geologic Cross Section Just North of LERF\nD-59\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nW E\ntl Formation)\n170-e -170\n160V- --dv**r I Go 4vrev rae\n170-~~ 160 G*\n150dY ri(G1.W -il- a170***(v GraveGrev\n-..h -~~ddr -4n G -0a\"yve m\nad fitysndvf I- afr\nuS-\"te ~F130~~~~md -* nC-Aam r o 3\n2u0W Fres -1EteocCsStRingo\nD * 60.,.. 4,i Elephant4\nMountanl\nMouai\n110 -11\n2 Figure D-14. West to East Geologic Cross Section Just South of LERF\nD-60\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n0.2\n0.16\n0,12\n0 04f\n0.\n0 1000 2 0E+3 3 0E'3 4 0E*3 5 06+3\nT me (sec)\nWELL TEST ANALYSIS\nData Set C:%Documents and Settlrg s091818My DocumentlkE26 79E26-79-TE26-14 aqt\nDate: 07,26/,3 Time 20 03,41\nPROJECT INFORMATION\nCompany CH2MHil\nClient DOE\nLocation: LERF\nTest Welt 299-E26-14\nTest Date 9-27-2011\nAQUIFER DATA\nSaturated Thickness 18 ft Arnsotropy Rato (KzIKr) 896 4\nWELL DATA\nPumptng Wells Observaton WellsWelt Name X ft) Y Z() Wil Name X ft Y\n299-E26-14 0 -0 299E26,14 0 0\nSOLUTION\nAquifer Model Unconfined Solution Method Moench\nT 56,97 cm lsec S 1100E-10\nSy 06001 B 1023= 2\nSw 06 r(w) = 0 flt\n1\n2 a = empirical constant (fitting parameter, early part of curve matching) for noninstantaneous drainage\n3 j = empirical constant (fitting parameter, late part of curve matching)\n4 Kz = vertical hydraulic conductivity Kr = horizontal hydraulic conductivity\n5 T = transmissivity S = storativity\n6 Sy = specific conductance . Sw = wellbore skin factor\n7 r(c) = casing radius r(w) = well radius\n8 Figure D-1 5. AQTESOLV Moench Unconfined Aquifer Pumping/Recovery Test for Type-Curve\n9 Match to Well 299-E26-14 with Wellbore Skin Affects and Delayed Gravity Response\nD-61\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n0.2 *-\n0.16\n01\n~008\n0 04\n004\n0 1000 2,0E+3 3 OE 3 4 0E+3 5 06+3\nTime (sec)\nWELL TEST ANALYSIS\nData Set C.\\Oocuments and SettingsdN)091881My Documents26-79\\E26-79f 26-14 aqt\nDate 07/26113 Time 22 12:52\nPROJECT INFORMATION\nCompany CH2MHill\nChent POE\nLocation: LERF\nTest Well 299E26-14\nTest Date 927-2011\nAQUIFER DATA\nSatuated Thickness 18 ft\nWELL DATA\nPumping Wells Obsevaton Wells\nWell Name _ X(ft); Y (t) Well Name Xf) Y29-E26140 0 299-E244 0 0\nSOLUTION\nAquifer Model: Uncanfined Solution Method Neuman\nT =5078 cm2/sec S zI 10E-10\nSy=0o co. =102o3\n1\n2 T = transmissivity S = storativity\n3 1 = empirical constant (fitting parameter, late part of curve matching)\n4 Sy = specific conductance\n5 Figure D-16. AQTESOLV Neuman Unconfined Aquifer PumpinglRecovery Test for Type-Curve\n6 Match to Well 299-E26-14 with Delayed Gravity Response\nD-62\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n06\n02\n-0,6\n0.001 0.01 0 1 1 10\nTime (sec)\nWELL TEST ANALYSIS\nData Set\nDate 07/26113 Time 11 38 17\nPROJECT INFORMATION\nCompany: CH2MHIl\nClient DOE\nLocanon LERF\nTest Well 299-E26-77\nTest Date 11-18-2008\nAQUIFER DATA\nSaturated Thickness: 24 15 ft Anisotropy Ratio (Kz(r): 1\nWELL DATA 1299-E26-77-2)\nInitial Displacement 3,347 ft Static Water Column Hetgt 2415 ft\nTotal Well Penetration Depth: 24 15 ft Screen Length 24.15 It\nCasing Radius: 0. 167 ft Well Radius: 0.83 f\nSOLUTION\nAquifer Model Unccnflned Solution Method: Snger-Gelhar\nK =C0 1549cm/sec Le = 0 8248 ft\n1\n2 K = Hydraulic conductivity\n3 Le = Effective water column length\n4 Figure D-17. AQTESOLV Springer-Gelhar Critically Dampened Type-Curve Match to Well 299-E26-77\n5 Second Slug Withdraw Test November 18, 2008\nD-63\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n299-E26-10, 299-E26-14, 299-E26-79\nSulfate (mg/L)\n* Detect 0 Undetect * 299-E26-10 U 299-E26-14 A 299-E26-79\n280,000\n210,000\n70,000\n0\n2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014\nYear\n1\n2 Figure D-18. Comparison of Sulfate Concentration Results in Wells 299-E26-10,\n3 299-E26-14, and 299-E26-79\n299-E34-7, 299-E26-10, 299-E26-77\nSulfate (mg/L)\n* Detect 0 Undetect * 299-E34-7 0 299-E26-10 A 299-E26-77\n680,000\n510,000\nq 340,000\n170,000 '\n0\n1986 1993 2000 2007 2014\nYear\n4\n5 Figure D-19. History of Sulfate Increases in Wells 299-E26-10, 299-E26-77,\n6 and 299-E34-7\nD-64\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nCatnia, Yaw cegscongratvn B~ ~ ~ia 4\nWADl pf.,w 299W.%\n$~AtCY130134 158\n(LERF £I\nE671Bi-,n IfI asin Bisnj 1VO3 123\nE t\n42'2 03 40 0\n- -4\nCY2006 158 OD\n00\nW-715 CY20I3 164 E27I 2579\n20 0Y0314 cz 1 \"\nCY2013 93\nCY2008 54 'l..f 244.4\nCY2013 U4 CY2053 10 NO 6C\nO'2013~CY01 1603 ~ E?-4~~ z\n122 27061010 a 77, n\nCY 0 8C 20 2 ;\nCY7013 110 /\n/ / 11* E61\nCY2003 :1 -X -' Y03 9z\n2-7\n2 Figure D..20. 2008 and 2013 Regional Sulfate Plume >.4Z\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n299-E34-7, 299-E26-11, 299-E26-10\nSulfate (mg/L)\n* Detect 0 Undetect 0 299-E34-7 E 299-E26-11 A 299-E26-10\n680,000-\n510,000\n340,000\n170,000-\n1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014\nYear\n1\n2 Figure D-21. Comparison of Sulfate Increases in Wells 299-E26-10, 299-E26-11,\n3 and 299-E34-7\n4\nD-66\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART Il1, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n* Montomng Well\nDecommissioned W9\nar0 P\"teo\na 5.0 100 150.m\n2 Figure D-22. Historical View of Changing Groundwater Conditions Beneath the Vicinity of LERF\nD-67\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n2 This page intentionally left blank.\n3\nD-68\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART Ill, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nWELL CONSTRCTION AND CCMP1OT*CN SUKARY\nzUli Sap I. TEMP~Cf\"YMethod: Cab!e too Meod: W do unted N.MBER: 2992 0ELL NO: L.MA -3Delibhg dCOI A~ddi~tive Manord\nfl-d LewZd: poaba d: s: N/ N 44 420 1 X/W W 46 19 IDritters MA S, t State NADe3 N E 77327 i3, ANr (L Wtkins ___Nt dimn.I !Altritts: N 449,602 E 2 2t\nCompay KaV y EnginA a Location: Hanford Card 0: Not documented T_ R_ _ S\nD taLe ElevatonStrted 2C,9O C t:2AR G:ond surface: 59.49-a -tcp\nDepth to water- 1-93,3-ft. Se90\n(Ground SurfclW 4u9 !ivto -=a rfeenc pon: [401.47-ftj\n(top o01 sta\nTW4~LZL Ysoocgipt's Hagt rt reference point abovel 2.96-4 I!;AT:s3AV)NY gtotq fiufacS-ali ght ly\n:*it f sufc xeal C0 St GravaQy v S;,ND Type co aurfac seal;5-24: Sandly GRAVEL Cement grut 27-70.4-ft24-30: S! gravelly SAND 4x4-ft x 6-in concrete pad30-35: Gv y SAND extenda 2.7-f into annulus3-100: Mddy ~sady GRAVEL\n100-105: GRAVEL\n105-1.10: Muddy sandy GRAVEL\n110- 130: Sandy GRAVEL -nr I\"- atdlrnles s steel casing,130-135: Muddy %Andy RAVEL I9 t\n135-1451 Sdy GRAVEL .\n145-10 Mi.ddy sady GRAVEL\n150-165 Sandy GRAVEL Hoe dareter,15-i40i Muddy sandy GRAVEL 0-9..-t, 13-io nominal\n116 & a3dy GRAVEL IF~.TIF T~ft. 11-i o\n1e5-204.3: Muddy sexy GRAVEL r?- OCI-t, 17 n l.30.6: BASALT\nin Voly bentonuw tbl* s\n4-in 4104 atA.nless steel s-rear.\n19.5~T4 ,r 10.1-fT d-1f\n2 Figure D-23. Well Construction Diagram for Well 299-E26-1O in LERF Groundwater\n3 Monitoring Network\nD-69\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\ntMLL CONSTRUCTION AN CMPLETIM SatMARY\nDrilling SUple Drive barrel WELL TEPORARY\ntthr he to Nethod* ard tootE M426-1 WELL go: LF-\nGrittrng 200n Akritisd\nFluid Wedi Potable sater Used: *m Coordinates: N/S X\nGr Lr's tM State State *AM a 157134.6k\nNm: L Vatkin Lie N.A. Coordinatr:: o dcu me.ted\nDril lg Coampanytar\nCtopew: Raiser ngineers Locationn..Banfo Crd 0: M ga Uo __ R- t -\nDate Date Elevation\nStarted: 21JU90 Cmplete:, 2UM90 Oroimd Surface: 59672-ft (Grat t 2o)\nDepth to ste. 1829-I*t atSOF *\n(Ground surface)J91.3-ft 14un95 -I Elevation of reference point: K99.68tt\n(top of casing)\nGENERALIZED Seologist's r a height of reference point abovetU _jj\nSTRATIGRAPIY Log Ground surface\nStetightly\na Depth of surface seat 3.158t\n0-24: Sandy GRAVEL Type of surface vet:\n24*40: GRAVEL Camant grout 3.0-15.8-ft,\n40\"63: Sandy GRAVEL 4A4-ft x 6-in concrete pad\n53-S4: Ruddy SAND extending 3.0-ft Into annulus\n54*5: Grawl ty SAND\n55-60z Grawl Ly SAW\n60.45: Sandy GRAWL\n65-70: uddy sandy GRAVEL 4-in ID staintess stee casing,\n70-80: Sandy GRAVEL 11.0200.2-ft\n805: tuddy sandy GRAVEL\n85-90: Sandy RAVEL\n90100: Ruddy sandy GRAVEL *ate Ofesr,\n1000105: Sandy GRAVEL I 5f 3 ninal\n105-110: GRAVEL naminet\n110-135: Sandy GRAVEL t an rie\n135-140: RAVEL\n140*145: Sandy GRAVEL\n145-155: GRAVEL\n155-160s Ruddy sardy GRAVEL\n160-165: Sandy GRAVEL\n165-193: Ruddy sandy GRAVEL\n193-198: S gravel ty sandy iR\n198-206.2: BASALT\nSentonite crumbles,\n1S.-8*1B.0-ft. 5-20-mah\n5-in bentonite hole plug.\n19701060- tf t 20co40ndpsh\n4-in V304, stainless stet acre\"\nwicharwnt pock200.2*205.AI-t\n-Sorehole drilled depth:\nDrawing sy: 8KL/2126-11.ASS\nDate : itwall.\nReference :\nFigure D-24. Well Construction Diagram for Well 299-E26-11 in the Past LERF Groundwater\n2 Monitoring Network\nD-70\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nWELL SUMMARY SHEET Dae A1 Page t Of 1F; Date: 9/27/11\nWell ID: CB204 Well Name 299-E26-14\nLation: 250 meters south of LERF Facility Prect 2 M-24 RCRA Groundwater Wells\nPrepWd By Patrick Cabba Date:10/20/11 Reviewed BY. eDa\nSi__ature _ _Sipu\nCONSTRUCTION C TA lLOGC/HYDROLOGIC DATA\nDescripson Diagra\nStalns Steel Pwctive 4 -0\n2.88 ft above ground surface 0- GravelDri tad (C)\nType 1/ll Portland Cemr4enI Gmut- 1-34 Saty Sand GravelfC)\n0 -92ft bp\n$8 Granu1ar Bentonite Crn*4rs\n92-173ftbp\n4in L.D, Sdiodule 10, Type 304,\nStaines Stel Permanent Caskig - S Qrs __ _\nL79 ft ap -195,90 ft b 3\" Sandy ( l\nAll tem57 Gravel Sand (g w)so7783 Sand Gravel (sGq\n81398 Sandy Gravel (sG)\n1901 443 Gravel Sand (&S)\n10Al1t Gravelly Sand W S)\n10&1225Sandy Gravel( (G_\n120 -- ?122-17 Sandy ravel )s\nAll temporary drilln was\nremnoved from the pond.14)\nAll depths are in feet below ground\nSurface.\nThe borTehole was drilled with 10 V-\ninh O.D. casng from 0. -1I06 ft\nbga, with 8 .inch 0D. cuing from\n1006 -2201 ft by, and with open\nhole from 2207 to 240.6 ft bgs.\n2 Figure D-25. Well Construction Diagram for Well 299-E26-14 in LERF Groundwater\n3 Monitoring Network\nD-71\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nWELL S Start Date: 9/M1\nFinish Date 9/27/11\nWell ID. C8204 W Name 299-E26-14\nLocation 250 meters south of LERF Facility Project 2 M-24 RCRA Groundwater Wes\nPrepurd By:Patrick Cabbage Date:10/21/11 Review By e eler Date: ,\nCONSTRUCTION DATA GEOLOGICHYDROLOGIC DATA\nsun' s Sanml Depths (ft by)\n48 Granular Bentarle Crm==bler% 177-180 St Gral (mG\n9.2-1873 ft bgs 1~ silty Sny Crae (-9\n4-in L.D., Schedul 10,Typ 30k,\nI.9 It ag -195.90 ft bgs\nAli seouy ang 200 2co2Gawa\n187l -190l!0 ft bow 220 Su Sandy Gravel LC\nlndt-.2 0ilt §!ndn fman.-001Sbtic Wa e Level 205210 Gravel (C)\n194 ft bp (9/27/11) 210-215n Sandy Cravel (sG)\nStam~m Stel 3 4t Scren:-'215-2 2175it S&\n19&.90 -215.9o It bph2a!tGavls,\nPrimary Pi ter Pack \n221 20 6 asal to-20 Mesh Colorado Silica Sa~ n-4A&a\n1900 -2196 Its p24 TD240A ft bgs (094t*2011\n4\"i LD., Sche~dule 14\nTypeK F sigrew Steel Sum\n215.90 -218 90 ftbgs\n3/8-in bentonite 260-\n2 M. 4.6 t bgs\nAll temporary drill c(sC waemoved from the grourt\nAll depths arein feet below gramnd\nsurface.\nThe borehole was dribed with to 4\nksch O.D. cubin firom 0.0 -1004 ft\nby, with a -nh0 0. casin frm\n10D.6 -220.7 ft bgs, and with open\nbale fom 220.7to 240,6 ft byt\n2 Figure D-25. Well Summary Sheet for Well 299-E26-14 in the LERF Groundwater\n3 Monitoring Network (Cont.)\nD-72\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nWELL SUMMARY SHEET start oa\": IhOhm-r.\nWe* to. ( 4rog wcteap 79 ( .- 2\nLocanm (wak .U*e. Lear E.c Prope j2A 2fV jq4(1F\n_*_____. ____ 0. B y Dow. _ oil\nBr awl C~ &L__ _ __ _CONStUCnu DATA GEOLOGIC fYDROLOGIC DATA\nDescapean Fem\nDoc.b o~Aa; Fee Gr~i LJA4. Dew-x~~T 14 M aswc .\n2003 2. n. 4a\n2-\nD-73(9-, k23 22>\n(14 a if Z3 -. f\n1 Figure D-26. Well Summary Sheet for Well 299-E26-77 in LERF Groundwater Monitoring Network\n2\nD-73\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nWELL SUMMARY SHEET P690 I- OL\nton Lt Em HA 4\nAveww ay: Rev*W By\nGEOLOGICMYDROLOWC DATA\nDepth n\nFeet ctagi Feat onC'C )Log\n~~55\nA400: t0;01-n 1A a13\n1Figure D-26. Well Summary Sheet for Well 299-E26-77 in LERF Groundwater Monitoring Network (Cont.\n2\nD-74\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART Ill, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nI i=ar ain an~ A.4 ETF\nWELL SUMMARY SHEET Fgej 2.\nC STUCT0i ATADoo 0 EOLOGWCIHYROLOQIC DATA\nco\" ahoxc Deavac f\n0.cna oLne.mtestanone athI\n** 9 744\"\nI.\" 4n:,etk~w 2- -A__7- _______\nll L* t-7 22c0-2 %n%, .b*reo /.je t n\n9f~AA~At AA..JI. .8\nc\", '006\nFigure D-27. Well Summary Sheet for Well 299-E26-79 in LERF Groundwater Monitoring Network\n2\nD-75\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nWELL SUMMARY SHEET {- *: ca wt jPao.-of ..\nwed , w Name 7 g. rz ,- \"\nLocWaon LePrF zV4g- AM VIAft t7)-eb (Legos\nPrepared By Js: RvwdB-sc1La\nDae *4 4 Reiewd By L , b. / Dane (4A\nC4TRUCT~ODATA GEOLOGICMYDROLOGC DATA\nDescrpon Dagan Fet G4pk Ltoogic Descrpto.nLog __________________ _\nr-N -)\"J\n.' Maa\nI Is I onC- -0\nr-\n-~~ -J '$ .\nFigure D-27. Well Summary Sheet for Well 299-E26-79 in LERF Groundwater Monitoring Network (Cont.)\nD-76\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART Ill, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\nE35-2 E26-t4(WL;UG)\nGroundwater\nFlow\nE26-77(W1L Basin Basin Basin E26-11LERF 42 43 44\n*E26-79(VVUG) E26-1 5(V4UDG)\nE26 1(WL)\nProposed Well Factiy\n* RCRA Montonng Wei Wste Site\nFormer RCRAWell r O perat~onalArea\nx Decommtsoned Well Basalt Above Hater Table\nWell prefi 299- or -699- omitted\nWIl Latel -Wel iame (Type\nV&WI. 'ter Level\nDG13 Downgradient\nUG *Upgradlent\n1\n2 Figure D-28. Proposed LERF Well and Facility Description Map\n3\nD-77\n DOE/RL-2013-46 Rev. 0\nWA7890008967, PART III, OPERATING UNIT GROUP 3\nLERF AND 200 AREA ETF\n1\n2 This page intentionally left blank.\nD-78\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nADDENDUM E\nSECURITY REQUIREMENTS\nAddendum E.i\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum E.ii\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n2 ADDENDUME\n3 SECURITY REQUIREMENTS\n4\n5\n6 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n7 E. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS ................................................ 5\n8 E.1 Security .................................................................. 5\n9 E.1.1 Waiver............................................................... 5\n10\nAddendum E.iii\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum E.iv\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 E. SECURITY REQUIREMENTS\n2 The Liquid Effluent Retention Facility (LERF) and 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility (200 Area ETF)\n3 are operated to minimize exposure of the general public and operating personnel to dangerous waste.\n4 E.1 Security\n5 Refer to Permit Attachment 3, Security. The LERF and 200 Area ETF are located within the 200 Area of\n6 the Hanford Facility and access is controlled by physical barriers, which complies with\n7 WAC 173-303-310(2)(c). Signs stating Danger-Unauthorized Personnel Keep Out, or equivalent\n8 language, legible at 25 feet or more, are posted near the entrance of each storage/processing area.\n9 E.1.1 Waiver\n10 Waiver of the security procedures and equipment requirements for LERF and 200 Area ETF are not\n11 requested, therefore; WAC 173-303-310(1)(a) and (b) are not applicable to LERF and 200 Area ETF.\n12\nAddendum E.5\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum E.6\n I\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nADDENDUM F\nPREPAREDNESS AND PREVENTION\nAddendum F.i\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum F.ii\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1\n2 ADDENDUM F\n3 PREPAREDNESS AND PREVENTION\n4\n5\n6 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n7 F. PREPAREDNESS AND PREVENTION.................... .................. 5\n8 F. 1 Preparedness and Prevention Requirements....................................5\n9 F.1.1 Equipment Requirements................................................5\n10 F.1.2 Aisle Space Requirement................................................6\n11 F.2 Preventive Procedures, Structures, and Equipment...............................6\n12 F.2.1 Unloading Operations, Spill Prevention, and Control..............................6\n13 F.2.2 Runoff..............................................................6\n14 F.2.3 Water Supplies.......................................................7\n15 F.2.4 Equipment and Power Failure.............................................7\n16 .2.5 Personnel Exposure..................................................... 8\n17 .3 Prevention of Reaction of Ignitable, Reactive, and Incompatible Waste...... ................... 8\n18\nAddendum F.i\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum F.iv\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 F. PREPAREDNESS AND PREVENTION\n2 F.1 Preparedness and Prevention Requirements\n3 The following sections document the preparedness and prevention measures taken at the Liquid Effluent\n4 Retention Facility (LERF) and 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF).\n5 F.1.1 Equipment Requirements\n6 The following sections describe the internal and external communications systems and the emergency\n7 equipment required that could be activated by the LERF and 200 Area ETF Building Emergency\n8 Director (BED).\n9 F.1.1.1 Internal Communications\n10 When operators are present at the LERF, the operators carry two-way radios to maintain contact with\n11 200 Area ETF personnel. The operators at LERF are informed of emergencies (e.g., building and/or area\n12 evacuations, take-cover events, high airborne contamination, fire, and/or explosion), and are provided\n13 with emergency instructions by several systems. These systems include the mobile two-way radios, and\n14 the telephone in the LERF instrument building.\n15 The 200 Area ETF is equipped with an intemal communication system to provide immediate emergency\n16 instruction to personnel. The onsite communication system at the 200 Area ETF includes telephones,\n17 mobile two-way radios, a public address system, and alarm systems. The telephone and radio systems\n18 provide for internal and external communication. Alarm systems exist to allow personnel to respond\n19 appropriately to various emergencies, including building evacuations, take cover events, and fire and/or\n20 explosion. Addendum J provides additional information on the response activities.\n21 F.1.1.2 External Communications\n22 The LERF and its operators are equipped with devices for summoning emergency assistance from the\n23 Hanford Fire Department, the Hazardous Materials Response Team, and/or Hanford patrol, as necessary.\n24 External communication to summon emergency assistance is made by a normal telephone system or\n25 mobile two-way radios. The LERF telephone is available in the instrumentation building. The 200 Area\n26 ETF uses fire alarm pull boxes and telephones for external communication and are located at numerous\n27 locations throughout the 200 Area ETF.\n28 F.1.1.3 Emergency Equipment\n29 The LERF and 200 Area ETF rely primarily on the Hanford Fire Department to respond to fires and other\n30 emergencies as described in Permit Attachment 4, Hanford Emergency Management Plan,\n31 (DOE/RL-94-02). All LERF and 200 Area ETF operators are familiar with the LERF and 200 Area ETF\n32 contingency plans (Addendum J) and are trained in the use of emergency pumping of LERF and 200 Area\n33 ETF systems, fire, and communications equipment.\n34 Portable fire extinguishers, fire control equipment, spill control equipment, and decontamination\n35 equipment is available at various locations in the 200 Area ETF.\n36 The 200 Area ETF has fire extinguishers, automatic fire suppression systems (200 Area ETF control room\n37 and electrical room), fire alarm pull boxes, and a water spray system (200 Area ETF operating and\n38 administrative portions).\n39 Respirators, hazardous material protective gear, and special work procedure clothing for 200 Area ETF\n40 personnel are kept in the change room at the 200 Area ETF. Safety showers are located in convenient\n41 locations in the 200 Area ETF, and emergency eyewashes are available for use. Water for these devices\n42 is supplied from the 200 Area ETF sanitary water system.\nAddendum F.5\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI F.1.1.4 Water for Fire Control\n2 A water main is not provided to the LERF. The Hanford Fire Department is equipped with fire engines\n3 for fire control for fires requiring high water volume and pressure. The 200 Area ETF is serviced by two\n4 12-inch raw water lines that are tied into the 200 East Area raw water distribution grids. These lines\n5 provide a looped configuration that supplies two independent sources of raw water for fire protection and\n6 raw water uses. Connections from the 200 Area ETF raw water system supply fire hydrants and the wet\n7 pipe sprinkler system. In the event that water pressure is lost, the Hanford Fire Department is equipped\n8 with fire engines to provide needed water.\n9 F.1.2 Aisle Space Requirement\n10 The operation of the LERF does not involve aisle space. Nevertheless, the LERF and the individual\n11 basins are easily accessible to emergency response personnel and vehicles. A 6.1-meter-wide service\n12 road runs along the base of the basin area on the east, south, and west sides within the operational security\n13 fence.\n14 Aisle spacing at 200 Area ETF is sufficient to allow the movement of personnel and fire protection\n15 equipment in and around the containers. This storage arrangement also meets the requirements of the\n16 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA 1996) for the protection of personnel and the environment.\n17 A minimum 30-inch aisle space is maintained between rows of containers as required by\n18 WAC 173-303-630(5)(c).\n19 F.2 Preventive Procedures, Structures, and Equipment\n20 The following sections describe preventive procedures, structures, and equipment.\n21 F.2.1 Unloading Operations, Spill Prevention, and Control\n22 Underground pipelines that transfer aqueous waste to and from the LERF are encased in a secondary pipe.\n23 If a leak is detected in a pipeline, flow in the pipeline will be stopped and the cause of the leak\n24 investigated and remediated.\n25 If it is required to transfer aqueous waste from one LERF basin to another, existing transfer pumps are\n26 used as described in Addendum C.\n27 The 200 Area ETF Load-in Station is monitored continuously during tank-filling operations and filling is\n28 stopped immediately if leaks occur. Care is taken to ensure that even minor leaks are cleaned up\n29 immediately and disposed of in accordance with approved management procedures. Any spill that is\n30 determined to be a dangerous waste will be managed according to the requirements of WAC 173-303.\n31 F.2.2 Runoff\n32 The LERF is constructed and operated to ensure that all aqueous waste is contained within the basins.\n33 The basins are designed and operated to prevent overtopping. Furthermore, the basins are provided with\n34 very low-density polyethylene floating covers to prevent the introduction of precipitation into the basins.\n35 The basins also are graded to ensure that all precipitation outside the basins is directed away from the\n36 surface impoundments.\n37 The basins are constructed so that the top of the basin dikes are approximately 3 meters above grade. The\n38 exterior side slopes of the basins have a 2.25 (horizontal) to I (vertical) slope. Run-on of precipitation to\n39 the basins from the surrounding area is not possible because the surrounding area slopes away from the\n40 LERF.\n41 Dangerous waste and hazardous chemical handling areas at the 200 Area ETF are designed to contain\n42 spills, leaks, and wash water, thereby preventing run-off and subsequent releases. All dangerous and/or\n43 mixed waste loading and unloading areas are provided with secondary containment structures as\n44 described in Addendum C, Process Information.\nAddendum F.6\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 F.2.3 Water Supplies\n2 The LERF uses operating practices, structures, and equipment to prevent the contamination of natural\n3 water supplies (i.e., groundwater and surface water). The LERF is monitored continuously in the ETF\n4 control room during liquid waste transfers and at least daily at other times to detect abnormal conditions\n5 (e.g., leaks), and regularly inspected to detect equipment and structural deteriorations that could allow\n6 possible water supply contamination. The basins are provided with a leachate collection system that is\n7 designed to contain any leachate generated. These systems, in conjunction with the double-composite\n8 liner system and underlying low permeable clay liner, ensure that should a release occur, the release will\n9 be fully contained within the basin configuration and, therefore, water supplies will be protected.\n10 Addendum J, Contingency Plan, provides information on procedures that are implemented if a release is\n11 detected at the LERF.\n12 There are no drinking water wells near the 200 Area ETF. Therefore, a release would not immediately\n13 contaminate drinking water supplies. The 200 Area ETF uses operating practices, structures, and\n14 equipment to prevent the contamination of natural water supplies (i.e., groundwater and surface water).\n15 The 200 Area ETF is continuously monitored in the ETF control room during liquid waste processing\n16 operations and/or Load-In Station transfer to detect abnormal conditions and at least daily at other times ,\n17 and is inspected regularly to detect equipment and structural deteriorations that could allow spills to the\n18 environment. Areas in contact with dangerous and/or mixed waste are monitored continuously in the ETF\n19 Control room during Load-in Station and/or ETF processing operations through a series of level and\n20 pressure indicators, leak detection alarms, equipment failure alarms, and control panel readouts. In\n21 addition, the 200 Area ETF is inspected regularly for the presence of leaks or other off normal conditions\n22 wherever possible (in all areas that can be safely entered).\n23 In addition to detailed operating practices, structures and equipment are used at the 200 Area ETF to\n24 prevent contamination of water supplies. The structures and equipment designed to prevent\n25 contamination of water supplies are the same as the structures and equipment used to prevent run-off from\n26 dangerous and/or mixed waste handling areas.\n27 F.2.4 Equipment and Power Failure\n28 The storage function of the LERF is not affected by loss of power and a temporary loss of power would\n29 not pose a threat to the environment. Loss of electrical power would not cause the storage of the waste to\n30 be jeopardized. For process condensate transferred from the 242-A Evaporator, appropriate valving\n31 procedures are followed to ensure a smooth restart of the flow to the LERF in the event of a power failure\n32 at the 242-A Evaporator.\n33 The 200 Area ETF does not have a standby power source. Power to selected lighting, computers, and\n34 process controls is configured with an uninterruptible power supply. During partial loss of normal power,\n35 the effected pumps and subsystems will be shut down. Complete loss of power to the 200 Area ETF\n36 shuts down the entire 200 Area ETF except for the instruments in the control room connected to the\n37 uninterruptible power supply. Redundant pumps allow the process to continue to operate when only one\n38 component is out of service.\n39 When power at the 200 Area ETF is lost, the valves assume a fail-safe position to allow the process to\n40 remain in a safe shutdown mode until restoration of power. This action allows the operators to perform\n41 equipment surveys during shutdown and to confirm that there are no safety issues because the 200 Area\n42 ETF is shut down. Because a power failure would also shutoff flow into the 200 Area ETF, there will not\n43 be any increase in volume in any of the holdup basins, tanks, or other systems.\n44 A combination of reliability, redundancy, maintenance, and repair features are used in the 200 Area ETF\n45 equipment and systems to minimize random failure of equipment. For crucial systems such as ventilation\n46 filters, redundant trains are provided to mitigate equipment and system failure. Spare parts are\n47 maintained for essential production and safety equipment.\nAddendum F.7\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 F.2.5 Personnel Exposure\n2 At the LERF and 200 Area ETF, operating practices, structures, and equipment are used to prevent undue\n3 exposure of personnel to dangerous and/or mixed waste. All personnel handling waste use protective\n4 clothing and equipment. All operations are conducted so that exposure to dangerous and/or mixed waste\n5 and hazardous materials are maintained as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA).\n6 Protective clothing and equipment are prescribed for personnel handling chemicals or dangerous waste.\n7 Before the start of any operation that could expose personnel to the risk of injury or illness, a review of\n8 the operation is performed to ensure that the nature of hazards that might be encountered is considered\n9 and appropriate protective gear is selected. Personnel are instructed to wear personal protective\n10 equipment in accordance with training, posting, and instructions.\n11 A change trailer at LERF is located between Basins 42 and 43. In addition, the change trailer has an\n12 operations office for working with procedures. Exits within the change trailer are clearly marked. A\n13 storage building is located within the perimeter fence, northwest of the basins. The LERF storage\n14 building also is provided with separate storage areas for clean and contaminated equipment. A\n15 decontamination shower and decontamination building is located at the 272-AW Building, approximately\n16 1.6 kilometers from the LERF or at the 200 Area ETF.\n17 The 200 Area ETF has eyewash stations and safety showers in convenient locations for use by personnel.\n18 The following structures and equipment were incorporated into the 200 Area ETF design to minimize\n19 personnel exposure.\n20 * Offices, control room, clean- and soiled-clothes storage areas, change rooms, and the lunchroom\n21 are situated to minimize casual exposure of personnel.\n22 * Building exit pathways are located to provide rapid egress in emergency evacuations.\n23 * Emergency lighting devices are located strategically throughout the 200 Area ETF.\n24 * Audio and/or visual alarms are provided for all room air samplers, area alarms, and liquid\n25 monitors. Visual readouts for these alarm systems are located in less contaminated areas to\n26 minimize exposure to personnel.\n27 * Areas for decontaminating and maintaining equipment are provided in contaminated areas to limit\n28 the spread of contamination to uncontaminated areas such as the control room.\n29 * Instrument interlock systems automatically return process operations to a safe condition if an\n30 unsafe condition should occur.\n31 * The 200 Area ETF ventilation systems are designed to provide airflow from uncontaminated\n32 zones to progressively more contaminated zones.\n33 Whenever possible, exposures to hazards are controlled by accepted engineering and/or administrative\n34 controls. Protective gear is used where effective engineering or administrative controls are not feasible.\n35 F.3 Prevention of Reaction of Ignitable, Reactive, and Incompatible Waste\n36 Typically, aqueous waste managed at the LERF or 200 Area ETF does not display the characteristics of\n37 reactivity or ignitability. Any aqueous waste streams exhibiting these characteristics are blended or\n38 mixed at LERF to a concentration where the waste no longer exhibits reactive or ignitable characteristics.\n39 Incompatible aqueous waste is not expected to be stored or treated at the LERF or 200 Area ETF\n40 (Addendum B, Waste Analysis Plan). Therefore, the requirements of WAC 173-303-806(4)(a) are not\n41 applicable.\n42\nAddendum F.8\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nADDENDUM G\nPERSONNEL TRAINING\nAddendum G.1\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum G.2\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 ADDENDUMG\n2 PERSONNEL TRAINING\n3 Specific requirements for the Hanford Facility Personnel Training program are described in Permit\n4 Attachment 5. The Permittees will comply with the training matrix below which provides training\n5 requirements for Hanford Facility personnel associated with the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility\n6 (LERF) and the 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF). Refer to the LERF & 200 Area ETF\n7 Dangerous Waste Training Plan (DWTP) for a complete description of the personnel training\n8 requirements. As required by Permit Condition 11.1.1, a copy of the LERF & 200 Area ETF DWTP will\n9 be placed in the Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF & 200 Area ETF file, and will be updated by\n10 the Permittee as unit-specific conditions change. Training received by facility personnel will be\n11 commensurate with the duties they perform. Individuals are not required to receive training for\n12 work/duties they do not perform.\n13 LERF and 200 Area ETF Training Matrix\nTraining Category\nPermit General Contin- Emergency\nAttachment 5, Hanford gency Coordi- Operations Training\nTraining Facility Plan nator\nCategory Training Training Training\nLERF & 200 Area Emergency General Contain Tank\nETF DWTP Orient- Response Emergency Waste er System Surface\nimplementing ation (contingency Coordinator Manage Manage Manage- Impound-\ncategory Program plan) Training -ment -ment ment ment\nJOB\nTITLE/POSITION\nNuclear Chemical X X X X X XOperator (NCO)\nOperations\nsupervisor Shift X X XOperations\nManager (SOM)\nEngineer/scientist X X\nEnvironmental\nField X X\nRepresentative\nWaste Service X X XProvider\nSampler X X X\n14\n15\nAddendum G.3\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum G.4\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1\n2 ADDENDUM H\n3 CLOSURE PLAN\n4\n5\nAddendum H.i\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum H.ii\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1\n2 ADDENDUM H\n3 CLOSURE PLAN\n4\n5\n6 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n7 H. CLOSURE PLAN................................ ..................... 5\n8 H. I Closure Plan...... ................................................... 5\n9 H.2 Closure Performance Standard ...................... 5...... ................ 5\n10 H.2.1 Closure Standards for Metal Surfaces, Rubber, Tanks, and Concrete .......... ............. 5\n11 H.2.2 Closure Standards for Piping and Ancillary Equipment ............................... 6\n12 H.2.3 Closure Standards for Underlying Soils...................................... 6\n13 H.3 Closure Activities ..................................................... 6\n14 H.3.1 General Closure Activities ...................................... ......... 7\n15 H.3.2 Constituents of Concern for Closure for the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility and 200 Area\n16 Effluent Treatment Facility................................................7\n17 H.3.3 Removing Dangerous Waste.................7............. .............. 7\n18 H.3.4 Decontaminating Structures, Equipment, and Soils. ...................... ......... 8\n19 H.4 Maximum Waste Inventory .............................................. 12\n20 H.5 Closure of Containers, Tanks, and Surface Impoundments ......................... 12\n21 H.5.1 Closure of Containers .................................................. 12\n22 H.5.2 Closure of Tanks ..................................................... 12\n23 H.5.3 Closure of Surface Impoundments.......................................... 12\n24 H.6 Schedule for Closure................................................... 12\n25\nAddendum H.iii\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n2\n3\n4\n5 This page intentionally left blank.\n6\nAddendum H.iv\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI H. CLOSURE PLAN\n2 This addendum describes the planned activities and performance standards for closing Liquid Effluent\n3 Retention Facility (LERF) and 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF).\n4 H.1 Closure Plan\n5 The LERF and 200 Area ETF will be closed by removal or decontamination with respect to dangerous\n6 waste contamination that resulted from operation asTtreatment, Storage, and Disposal (TSD) units, with\n7 closure of LERF occurring first. To facilitate closure, the LERF retention basins are being viewed as\n8 consisting of seven components: the covers and primary liner, drainage layer system/bentonite carpet\n9 liner, secondary liner, soil/bentonite, internal and/or external piping, ancillary equipment, and concrete\n10 basins. To facilitate closure of 200 Area ETF, the 200 Area ETF is being viewed as consisting of six\n11 components: tanks, internal and/or external piping, ancillary equipment, concrete floors/dikes/\n12 encasements, structures, and soil directly beneath the structure. It is anticipated that closure of LERF and\n13 200 Area ETF will begin after the projected 30-year active life of LERF and 200 Area ETF. If it is\n14 determined that closure by removal or decontamination is not possible, the closure plan will be modified\n15 to address required post closure activities.\n16 Uncontaminated structures will be left for future use or disassembled, dismantled, and removed for\n17 disposal. Uncontaminated equipment and structures could include aqueous makeup, HVAC and piping,\n18 steam condensate and cooling water piping, and the control room and office areas.\n19 Closure by removal or decontamination requires decontamination or removal and disposal of all\n20 dangerous waste, waste residues, contaminated equipment, soil, or other material established in\n21 accordance with the removal or decontamination closure performance standards of WAC 173-303-610(2).\n22 This and future closure plan revisions will provide for compliance with these performance standards.\n23 H.2 Closure Performance Standard\n24 Closure by removal or decontamination, as provided for in this plan based on the requirements of\n25 WAC 173-303-610(2), will eliminate future maintenance and will be protective of human health and the\n26 environment by removing or reducing chemical contamination at LERF and 200 Area ETF to levels that\n27 are below concern with respect to human health and the environment.\n28 This plan proposes to leave clean structures and equipment in place after closure for potential use in\n29 future operations. This need will be evaluated at the time of closure.\n30 H.2.1 Closure Standards for Metal Surfaces, Rubber, Tanks, and Concrete\n31 This closure plan proposes use of a 'clean debris surface' (defined in the following paragraph) as the clean\n32 closure performance standard for the metal surfaces, rubber (i.e., basin covers, liners, etc.), tanks, and\n33 concrete that will remain after closure. This approach is consistent with the Washington State\n34 Department of Ecology (Ecology) guidance (Publication #94-111, Ecology 2005) for achievement of\n35 clean closure. Additionally, adherence to this guidance ensures that all residues have been removed as\n36 required by WAC 173-303-640 for closure of the 200 Area ETF tank systems.\n37 The clean debris surface standard is verified visually.\n38 A clean debris surface means the surface, when viewed without magnification, shall be free of all\n39 visible contaminated soil and hazardous waste except residual staining from soil and waste\n40 consisting of light shadows, slight streaks, or minor discolorations and soil and waste in cracks,\n41 crevices, and pits may be present provided that such staining and waste and soil in cracks, crevices,\n42 and pits shall be limited to no more than 5% of each square inch ofsurface area (40 CFR 268.45).\n43 When a physical extraction method is used on concrete, the performance standard is based on removal of\n44 the contaminated layer of debris. The physical extraction performance standard for concrete is removal of\n45 0.6 centimeter of the surface layer and treatment to a clean debris surface. Inspections to verify\n46 achievement of a clean debris surface will be performed and documented.\nAddendum H.5\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI H.2.2 Closure Standards for Piping and Ancillary Equipment\n2 The internal and external piping of both LERF and 200 Area ETF that has contacted dangerous waste will\n3 be flushed and drained as part of closure. When practical, ancillary equipment, which has contacted\n4 dangerous waste will also be flushed and drained. For piping and ancillary equipment where the\n5 contaminated surfaces can be inspected, an inspection will be performed to see if the surfaces meets the\n6 clean debris surface standard in 40 CFR 268.45, incorporated by reference by WAC 173-303-140, and\n7 can be declared non-dangerous in accordance with WAC 173-303-071(3)(qq). If it is not possible to\n8 inspect the contaminated surfaces or meet the clean debris surface performance standard, the particular\n9 piping or ancillary equipment of concern will be removed, designated, and disposed of accordingly.\n10 Dangerous and/or mixed-waste materials generated during closure activities will be managed in\n11 accordance with WAC 173-303-610(5). Removal of any dangerous wastes or dangerous constituents\n12 during partial or final closure will be handled in accordance with applicable requirements of\n13 WAC 173-303-610(5).\n14 H.2.3 Closure Standards for Underlying Soils\n15 The LERF retention basins have a leachate collection system that channels the leachate to sumps at the\n16 bottom of the basins. The collected liquid is pumped back into the basins, thereby limiting fluid head on\n17 the secondary liner. The secondary liner is comprised of several protective layers, including a high-\n18 density polyethylene geomembrane and a soil/bentonite admixture. The soil below the LERF only could\n19 be contaminated if the layers of the secondary liner had failed. The primary liner and the drainage gravel,\n20 geotextile, and geonet between the primary and secondary liners cannot easily be decontaminated. The\n21 high-density polyethylene layer of the secondary liner also cannot be decontaminated. These materials\n22 will be removed and disposed according to the requirements of WAC 173-303-170. The soil/bentonite\n23 admixture will be sampled and analyzed for constituents of concerns according to the sampling and\n24 analysis plan developed prior to the time of closure. If the analytical results determine that the\n25 constituents of concern are at or below the levels in WAC 173-303-610(2)(b)(i), or background levels for\n26 Hanford soil if background is greater, the soil/bentonite admixture and the soil below LERF will be\n27 considered clean closed.\n28 Clean closure of soil under the 200 Area ETF will be accomplished by demonstrating that the coated\n29 concrete floor kept contaminants from reaching the soil. The coated concrete floor provided secondary\n30 containment for all the tanks and process piping. Unless inspections identify potential through-thickness\n31 cracks indicating containment failure and a subsequent potential for soil contamination from TSD unit\n32 operations, the soil will be considered clean closed. However, if inspections identify such cracks and\n33 there have been documented spills in the vicinity, potential soil contamination will be investigated. Soils\n34 will be sampled and analyzed for constituents of concern according to the sampling and analysis plan.\n35 The sampling and analysis plan will be prepared following the completion of a data quality objectives\n36 process in accordance with EPA/600/R-96/055 (QA/G-4), Data Quality Objectives Process, as amended.\n37 The data quality objectives process will be initiated prior to closure on a schedule to ensure timely closure\n38 of LERF. The sampling and analysis plan will be submitted to Ecology as part of a permit modification\n39 request meeting the requirements of WAC 173-303-830. The sampling and analysis plan will be prepared\n40 consistent with EPA/240/B-01/003 (EPA/QA R-5), EPA Requirements for Quality Assurance Project\n41 Plans, as amended.\n42 If the soil analytical results determine that the constituents of concern are at or below the levels in\n43 WAC 173-303-610(2)(b)(i), or background levels in the Hanford soil if background is greater, the soil\n44 will be considered clean closed. If the constituents of concern exceed background levels, the soil will be\n45 closed per the standards of WAC 173-303-610(2)(b).\n46 H.3 Closure Activities\n47 The LERF and 200 Area ETF were designed for a 30-year active life.\nAddendum H.6\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI At the time of closure, the closure plan will be modified as necessary to reflect current regulation or\n2 informational revisions in accordance with WAC 173-303-610(3)(b). If it is determined that clean\n3 closure is not possible, the closure plan will be modified to address required post closure activities.\n4 H.3.1 General Closure Activities\n5 The approach to LERF closure is to dispose of accumulated basin aqueous waste by processing the waste\n6 through 200 Area ETF. Primary basin liners, covers, drainage gravel, geonets, and secondary High\n7 Density Polyethylene (HDPE) liners will be removed, designated, and disposed of as described in\n8 Section G.3.4.1. Any remaining solids (residue) within the basins will also be removed, designated, and\n9 disposed of accordingly. Piping associated with LERF closure is intended to be decontaminated, drained,\n10 and inspected. Piping that meets the closure standard in Section G.2.2 will be left in place. Piping that\n11 does not meet the closure standard, or cannot be inspected, will be disposed of accordingly. Rinsate\n12 generated during decontamination also will be disposed of through 200 Area ETF. Sampling will assess\n13 whether contamination beneath the secondary HDPE liner has occurred. Contamination above\n14 background levels, if present, will be removed or decontaminated to meet the regulatory requirements of\n15 WAC 173-303-610(2)(b).\n16 The approach to 200 Area ETF closure is to process any aqueous waste through the effluent treatment\n17 system. Any waste, which cannot be treated at 200 Area ETF as the facility is being closed, will be\n18 transferred to other TSD units or off-site TSD facility. Piping will be rerouted and temporary piping\n19 installed to allow the isolation of tanks and ancillary equipment for draining, decontamination, and\n20 closure. Rerouted and temporary piping will be closed in the same manner as process piping. All\n21 structures and equipment will be decontaminated to the closure standards in Section G.2.2 or disposed.\n22 Piping associated with 200 Area ETF closure is intended to be decontaminated, drained, and inspected.\n23 Piping that meets the closure standard in Section G.2.2 will be left in place. Piping that does not meet the\n24 closure standard, or cannot be inspected, will be disposed of accordingly. Contamination, if present, will\n25 be managed in compliance with regulatory requirements.\n26 Equipment or materials used in performing closure activities will be decontaminated or disposed at a\n27 permitted facility.\n28 H.3.2 Constituents of Concern for Closure for the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility and\n29 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility\n30 Using the list of dangerous waste numbers in the Addendum A, Part A Form, constituents in the final\n31 delisting in 40 CFR 261 Appendix IX, sample results from wastes added to LERF and 200 Area ETF,\n32 process knowledge and the risk to human health and the environment, the constituents of concern for\n33 closure will be determined through the data quality objective process. Based on constituents in\n34 wastewater received at LERF from 2000 to 2006 which are present at five percent of their delisting levels\n35 or higher, the constituents of concern are:\n* Acetone * Carbon tetrachloride * Methyl ethyl ketone * Vanadium\n* Ammonia * Fluoride * n-Butyl alcohol\n* Barium * Lead * Total cresols\n* Chromium * Mercury * Tributyl phosphate\n36 Arsenic and beryllium are excluded because they are present in Hanford soils and may therefore give a\n37 false positive sample result. Constituents of concern vary in each basin. For example, ammonia may be\n38 present only in LERF Basin 42. The constituents of concern for each basin will be determined by process\n39 knowledge as part of the Data Quality Objectives process for the Sampling and Analysis Plan.\n40 H.3.3 Removing Dangerous Waste\n41 At the start of LERF closure, aqueous waste will be transferred sequentially from each basin to another\n42 LERF basin or to 200 Area ETF for treatment.\nAddendum H.7\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI At a pump rate of about 284 liters per minute, it will take approximately 60 days to empty a full basin.\n2 Basin covers will remain in place to prevent possible wind dispersion of waste until all basin waste has\n3 been removed.\n4 All of the aqueous waste inventory at the 200 Area ETF will be processed before closure. Any residue\n5 remaining in piping, equipment, or the LERF liner will be removed to an appropriate disposal unit. All\n6 containerized waste will be dispositioned. All secondary waste in containers will be transferred to an\n7 appropriate TSD unit.\n8 H.3.4 Decontaminating Structures, Equipment, and Soils\n9 This section discusses the activities necessary to implement a clean closure strategy for the LERF and\n10 200 Area ETF.\n11 H.3.4.1 Covers and Primary Liner\n12 The following steps will be performed to close each LERF basin cover and primary liner:\n13 * Wastewater will be removed from the basins and transferred to another LERF basin or to\n14 200 Area ETF. Additional pumps and piping may be installed to empty the basin as low as\n15 possible.\n16 * The basin cover will be cut into pieces and disposed in containers.\n17 * As much as practical of the remaining residue within the basins will be removed and transferred\n18 to containers, another LERF basin, or 200 Area ETF. Rinsing may be performed to facilitate\n19 removal.\n20 * The pipe risers, transfer pump, HDPE primary liner and bentonite carpet liner will be cut into\n21 pieces and disposed in containers.\n22 H.3.4.2 Drainage Layer and Secondary Liner\n23 The following steps will be performed to close each LERF basin drainage layer and secondary liner:\n24 * The drainage gravel, geotextile, and geonet will be cut into pieces, and disposed in containers.\n25 * As much as practical of the remaining residue on the secondary liner will be removed and\n26 transferred to containers, another LERF basin or 200 Area ETF. Rinsing may be performed to\n27 facilitate removal of residue.\n28 * The HDPE liner portion of the secondary liner will be visually inspected for physical damage.\n29 This will provide potential sampling locations to determine if the soil/bentonite below the HDPE\n30 liner may be clean closed.\n31 * The leachate pump, pump riser, and HDPE liner portion of the secondary liner will be removed,\n32 cut into pieces, and disposed in containers.\n33 * The soil/bentonite portion of the secondary liner will be visually inspected for signs of\n34 contamination. This will provide potential sampling locations to determine if the soil/bentonite\n35 may be clean closed.\n36 Assessment of contamination beneath the LERF's secondary liner will be performed within each basin by\n37 sampling the top surface of the 97-centimeter thick layer of soil/bentonite. Biased and random location\n38 selection will be used to increase the probability of detecting leachate contamination. Some sampling\n39 points will be chosen randomly, while others will be chosen where physical damage was noted during the\n40 inspection of the secondary HDPE liner and soil/bentonite layer, and in areas where the underlying\n41 material porosity and permeability and the hydraulic head would most likely drive any leachate. The\n42 leakage rate through the liner would increase toward the bottom of the liner as hydraulic head increases.\n43 Any leakage that did occur in the sloped sides could be expected to travel down slope through the\n44 geotextile between the primary and secondary liner until reaching the bottom of the liner.\nAddendum H.8\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI Therefore, the most likely area of contamination would be the soil/bentonite in the leachate sump and at\n2 the bottom of the basin. Sampling and disposal objectives will be determined at the time prior to closure\n3 activities through the data quality objectives process. The sampling and analysis plan will be prepared\n4 following the completion of a data quality objectives process in accordance with EPA/600/R-96/055\n5 (QA/G-4) Data Quality Objectives Process, as amended.\n6 The data quality objectives process will be initiated prior to closure on a schedule to ensure timely closure\n7 of LERF. The sampling and analysis plan will be submitted to Ecology as part of a permit modification\n8 request meeting the requirements of WAC 173-303-830. The sampling and analysis plan will be prepared\n9 consistent with EPA/240/1B-0 1/003 (EPA/QA R-5), EPA Requirements for Quality Assurance Project\n10 Plans, as amended.\n11 Sampling of the soil/bentonite will be performed in accordance with the sampling methods allowed for in\n12 WAC 173-303-110(2). Special care will be needed in sampling for volatiles. To aid in ensuring sample\n13 integrity, the initial sampling of the soil/bentonite may proceed while the secondary HDPE liner is in the\n14 process of being removed.\n15 If no constituents of concern are found above soil closure performance standards (Section G.2.3), no\n16 further analysis will be done. If the initial sample analysis indicates liner leakage, additional samples\n17 from different depths and locations will be taken to determine the spatial extent of contamination. The\n18 soil/bentonite will be removed in the area around the contamination and placed in containers. If\n19 contamination is found to extend through the entire depth of the soil/bentonite layer, soil beneath the\n20 basin that is contaminated above closure performance standards will also be removed and placed in\n21 containers.\n22 H.3.4.3 Tanks\n23 The following general steps will be performed to close, each 200 Area ETF tank and ancillary equipment:\n24 * Wastewater and chemical additions to the tank will be isolated or rerouted to a downstream tank.\n25 * Piping and ancillary equipment associated with the tank will be flushed with water and drained to\n26 the tank being closed, to another tank, or to containers.\n27 * Wastewater will be removed from the tank and transferred to another tank. Additional pumps and\n28 piping may be installed to empty the tank as low as possible.\n29 * All remaining residue at the bottom of the tank will be removed and transferred to another tank or\n30 containers. Rinsing may be performed to facilitate removal of residue.\n31 * An initial visual inspection of the tank's interior and exterior surfaces will be performed to\n32 determine the type of flushing that will allow the tank to be clean closed, or whether the tank\n33 cannot be clean closed.\n34 * The tank's surfaces, piping and ancillary equipment will be cleaned by chemical or physical\n35 extraction techniques described in 40 CFR 268.45. Flush solution will be transferred to another\n36 tank or containers. All flush solution at the bottom of the tank will be removed before visual\n37 inspection.\n38 * The tank, piping, and ancillary equipment will be inspected visually for compliance with the\n39 performance standard in Sections H.2.1 and H.2.2.\n40 Closure will begin with the Load-In Station tanks, surge tank, and other tanks of the main treatment train.\n41 The secondary treatment train will operate as long as possible to reduce the volume of flush water\n42 requiring disposal. Condensate from the secondary treatment train will be routed to the main treatment\n43 train or the verification tanks for storage or treatment.\n44 After rinsing, the tanks will be inspected visually for compliance with the performance standard. Visual\n45 inspection might be made remotely using a camera or other device that allows verification of meeting the\n46 performance standard.\nAddendum H.9\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI If any areas are found not meeting the clean debris surface performance standard, these areas will be\n2 decontaminated in-place, or the contaminated portions will be removed, designated, and disposed\n3 accordingly. Per 40 CFR 268.45, Table 1 incorporated by reference at WAC 173-303-140, only removal\n4 of contaminants from the surface layer is necessary for metal surfaces.\n5 The outside of the tanks also will be inspected for compliance to the performance standard. Any areas\n6 found not to meet this performance standard will be decontaminated in-place, or the contaminated\n7 portions will be removed, designated, and disposed accordingly.\n8 Before using decontamination solutions on the outside of the tanks, the floor will be inspected for cracks\n9 or other openings that could provide a pathway to soil. This inspection will be performed as described in\n10 Section G.2.3 in conjunction with mapping of potential through-thickness cracks. Any such cracks will\n11 be mapped. The cracks will be sealed before beginning treatment or other engineered containment\n12 devices (e.g., portable catch basins, liners) will be used to collect and contain solutions.\n13 Decontamination residues will be collected, designated, and managed as appropriate. If it is not possible\n14 to meet the clean closure performance standard, contaminated portions of the tanks could be removed,\n15 designated, and disposed of accordingly. The inspections for a clean debris surface will be documented\n16 on an inspection record.\n17 H.3.4.4 Internal and External Piping and Ancillary Equipment\n18 The internal piping and ancillary equipment for both LERF and 200 Area ETF, which have contacted\n19 dangerous waste will be flushed and drained as part of closure. Any treatment media, such as filters,\n20 reverse osmosis membranes, ion exchange resins, will be removed from the ancillary equipment, and\n21 disposed of accordingly. Where the contaminated surfaces can be inspected, an inspection will be\n22 performed to see if the piping and ancillary equipment meet the clean debris surface standard in\n23 40 CFR 268.45 and can be declared non-dangerous. If it is not possible to meet the clean debris surface\n24 standard or the piping or ancillary equipment cannot be inspected, those portions of the piping and\n25 ancillary equipment will be removed, designated, and disposed of accordingly.\n26 External piping (transfer lines) associated with LERF and 200 Area ETF consist of below grade and\n27 above grade piping. Below grade, piping will be dispositioned at closure consistent with the practices for\n28 below grade piping in the 200 Areas at the time of closure consistent with the 200-IS-I operable unit\n29 decisions. Above grade piping will be dispositioned consistent with the provisions for internal piping.\n30 Rinsate from the LERF and 200 Area ETF external piping and LERF internal piping will be processed\n31 through 200 Area ETF. Dangerous and/or mixed-waste solutions and materials generated during closure\n32 activities, which cannot be treated at 200 Area ETF will be managed in accordance with\n33 WAC 173-303-610(5).\n34 H.3.4.5 Concrete\n35 At LERF, the concrete catch basins are located at the northeast corner of each retention basin, where inlet\n36 pipes, leachate risers, and transfer pipe risers emerge for the basin. The concrete catch basin is curbed,\n37 and coated with a chemical resistant epoxy sealant. The concrete catch basin is sloped so that any leaks\n38 or spills from the piping or connections will drain into the basin. At the 200 Area ETF, the coated\n39 concrete floor and berm provides secondary containment for all the tanks and process piping.\n40 Closure of concrete at LERF and 200 Area ETF will be performed after the associated tanks, piping,\n41 ancillary equipment, and structures have been closed. All concrete will be inspected visually and\n42 surveyed before any decontamination. The purpose of the inspection will be twofold: to identify and\n43 map any cracks in the concrete that might have allowed contaminants a pathway to the soil below\n44 (Section G.2.3.), and to identify areas that potentially are contaminated with dangerous waste or\n45 dangerous waste residues. The inspection standard will be a clean debris surface as defined in\n46 Section G.2.1. The inspection of the concrete for a clean debris surface will be documented on an\n47 inspection record. Those areas already meeting the standard can be clean closed as is.\nAddendum H.10\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 Those potentially contaminated areas will undergo decontamination to meet the clean closure standard of\n2 a clean debris surface. The concrete will be washed down; the rinsate collected, designated, and disposed\n3 of accordingly. The concrete will be reinspected for a clean debris surface. Concrete surfaces indicated\n4 by visual examination, as still being potentially contaminated will have the surface layer removed to a\n5 depth of 0.6 centimeter by scabbing or other approved methods. This will not threaten the environment,\n6 even if potential through-thickness cracks had been found during the inspection, because concrete\n7 decontamination (scabbing) will not employ liquid solutions that could enter cracks and because scabbing\n8 residues will be vacuumed away from cracks as, any residue is generated.\n9 Achievement of a clean debris surface will be documented on an inspection record. Decontamination\n10 residues will be collected, designated, and managed as appropriate.\n11 H.3.4.6 Structures\n12 If contaminated with either dangerous or mixed waste constituents, the 200 Area ETF structures will be\n13 decontaminated and/or disassembled, if necessary, packaged, and disposed of in accordance with existing\n14 land disposal restrictions (WAC 173-303-140).\n15 Closure steps could include the following activities.\n16 * Containerize (as necessary and practicable) and remove any remaining waste.\n17 * Review operating records for spillage incidents and visually inspect storage area surfaces for\n18 evidence of contamination or for cracks that could harbor contamination or allow the escape of\n19 decontamination solutions. Inspect storage area surfaces for visible evidence of contamination\n20 (e.g., discoloration, material degradation, wetness, and odor). If contamination is evident, the\n21 affected area(s) will be decontaminated.\n22 * Decontaminate 200 Area ETF walls and floors to minimize the potential for loose contamination\n23 and facilitate any required surveys and/or chemical field screening. The structures could be\n24 cleaned by water rinse or high-pressure, low-volume steam cleaning coupled with a detergent\n25 wash. After decontamination, the walls and floors will be compared to closure performance\n26 standards.\n27 * Collect rinsate and manage as dangerous waste for appropriate disposal.\n28 * Secure (lock) personnel entries into building and post doors with appropriate warning signs.\n29 H.3.4.7 Underlying Soils\n30 Clean closure of soil under LERF's secondary liner will be accomplished by demonstrating that the liners\n31 and leak detection system kept contaminants from reaching the soil. The secondary liner provided\n32 secondary containment for the LERF basins. Unless inspections identify potential leaks, punctures,\n33 cracks, or tears indicating containment failure and a subsequent potential for soil contamination from\n34 TSD unit operations, the soil will be considered clean closed. However, if inspections identify such leaks,\n35 punctures, etc., potential soil contamination will be investigated.\n36 Clean closure of soil under 200 Area ETF will be accomplished by demonstrating that the coated concrete\n37 floor kept contaminants from reaching the soil. The coated concrete floor and bermed area provided\n38 secondary containment for all the tanks and process piping. Unless inspections identify potential\n39 through-thickness cracks indicating containment failure and a subsequent potential for soil contamination\n40 from TSD unit operations, the soil will be considered clean closed. However, if inspections identify such\n41 cracks and there have been documented spills in the vicinity, potential soil contamination will be\n42 investigated.\n43 Where it is possible visually to inspect directly beneath the tanks, a visual inspection will be performed.\n44 Where it is not possible visually to inspect beneath the tanks, an evaluation of the tank integrity will be\n45 made. The condition of the tank will be evaluated to determine if there was any potential for leakage. If\n46 no cracks, severe corrosion, or evidence of leaks is observed, it will be reasoned that mixed or dangerous\n47 waste solutions could not have penetrated to the soil directly below the tank.\nAddendum H.11\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 External piping (transfer lines) between the 242-A Evaporator and LERF and 200 Area ETF are double\n2 lined with a leak detection system. If records indicate that no leaks from the primary piping occurred, the\n3 soil will be considered clean with respect to RCRA closure.\n4 Where there is evidence that contamination may have leaked into the soil below tanks, concrete, or the\n5 soil/bentonite layer at LERF, the contaminated tank, concrete, or soil/bentonite layer will be removed to\n6 allow the underlying soil to be sampled to determine the depth of the contamination.\n7 Soil that is contaminated above the closure performance standards in Section G.2.3 will be removed,\n8 placed in containers, and disposed accordingly.\n9 H.4 Maximum Waste Inventory\n10 The maximum waste inventory for LERF and 200 Area ETF is in Addendum A.\n11 H.5 Closure of Containers, Tanks, and Surface Impoundments\n12 The following sections cover closure of containers, closure of tanks, and closure of surface\n13 impoundments.\n14 H.5.1 Closure of Containers\n15 Containers at 200 Area ETF will be used to contain dangerous waste in the event of a spill, unexpected\n16 release, or equipment failure. Containers will be used to accumulate nonradioactive dangerous waste\n17 and/or mixed wastes. All containers will be emptied and treated prior to closure of 200 Area ETF. Any\n18 containers used to contain dangerous and/or mixed waste at the 200 Area ETF that is generated during the\n19 closure process and therefore cannot be treated at 200 Area ETF will be designated and shipped to an\n20 onsite TSD unit or off-site TSD facility. Containers of dangerous and/or mixed waste will not be left in\n21 the 200 Area ETF after closure.\n22 H.5.2 Closure of Tanks\n23 Clean closure of 200 Area ETF will consist of the removal and disposal of all dangerous waste and the\n24 decontamination and/or removal and disposal of equipment which does not meet the performance\n25 standards in Section G.2, including tanks. The 200 Area ETF was designed to incorporate removable\n26 components. This design facilitates closure by allowing complete removal of equipment, which does not\n27 meet the performance standards.\n28 H.5.3 Closure of Surface Impoundments\n29 At closure, all of LERF that received regulated waste will be closed in accordance with the requirements\n30 of this approved closure plan, which are intended to ensure compliance with the requirements of\n31 WAC 173-303-650(6)(a)(i). All equipment, structures, and other material associated with closure of\n32 LERF will be decontaminated or removed in accordance with WAC 173-303-610(2). All basin waste and\n33 decontamination rinsate will be transferred to 200 Area ETF. Sampling and testing will be conducted as\n34 described in Section G.3.4.2.\n35 H.6 Schedule for Closure\n36 Closure of LERF and 200 Area ETF is not anticipated to occur within the next 30 years. The actual year\n37 of closure will depend on the time required for current waste to be processed and what role the LERF and\n38 200 Area ETF will play in processing additional waste generated during future activities in the 200 Areas.\n39 Other factors affecting the year of closure include changes in operational requirements, lifetime extension\n40 upgrades, and unforeseen factors. When a definite closure date is established, notification of closure will\n41 be provided in accordance with Permit Condition II.J.1.\n42 The activities required to complete closure are planned to be accomplished within 180 days in accordance\n43 with WAC 173-303-610(4)(b). Should a modified schedule be necessary, a revised schedule will be\n44 proposed through the permit modification procedure in accordance with WAC 173-303-610(4)(b).\n45\nAddendum H.12\n N\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nADDENDUMI\nINSPECTION REQUIREMENTS\nAddendum I.i\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum I.ii\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1\n2 ADDENDUMI\n3 INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS\n4\n5\n6 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n7 I. INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS .................... 5.......... .............. 5\n8 1.1 Inspection Plan...... ....................................................... 5\n9 1.1.1 General Inspection Requirements ...................................................... 5\n10 1.1.2 Specific Process Inspection Requirements .................... 6..... ............... 6\n11 1.1.3 Inspection Log ...... ....................................................... 8\n12 1.1.4 Storage of Ignitable or Reactive Wastes ......................... .................... 8\n13\n14 TABLES\n15 Table 1.1. Visual Inspection Schedule for the LERF and 200 Area ETF.........................9\n16 Table 1.2. Inspection Plan for Instrumentation Monitoring .................................. 11\n17\nAddendum I.iii\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum I.iv\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 1. INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS\n2 1.1 Inspection Plan\n3 This addendum describes the method and schedule for inspections of the Liquid Effluent Retention\n4 Facility (LERF) and 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF). The purpose of inspections is to help\n5 ensure that situations do not exist that might cause or lead to the release of dangerous and/or mixed waste\n6 that could pose a threat to human health and the environment. Abnormal conditions identified by an\n7 inspection will be corrected on a schedule that prevents hazards to workers, the public, and the\n8 environment.\n9 1.1.1 General Inspection Requirements\n10 The content and frequency of inspections are described in this section. Inspection records are retained in\n11 the Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF and 200 Area ETF file, or other approved locations, in\n12 accordance with Permit Condition 11.1.1.\n13 In certain areas of the 200 Area ETF, many inspections are performed remotely to maintain as low as\n14 reasonably achievable (ALARA) exposure. Monitoring instruments are connected to audible alarms and\n15 visual indicators track alarm status. The monitoring system provides trending of selected monitoring\n16 data, graphics, and equipment summary displays.\n17 A preventive maintenance recall system is employed to direct preventive maintenance activities at the\n18 LERF and 200 Area ETF. Equipment requiring maintenance is checked as indicated by the maintenance\n19 history and the manufacturer's recommendations. The preventive maintenance of certain equipment\n20 might not be possible if the LERF or the 200 Area ETF is in an operational mode. Thus, the preventive\n21 maintenance could be performed slightly earlier or later than planned to minimize impact on operations.\n22 Instrumentation at 200 Area ETF is calibrated regularly to ensure accuracy and reliability. All process\n23 control instrumentation is calibrated on a schedule depending on previous calibration experience. An\n24 instrument calibration and recall system is employed to manage calibrations.\n25 1.1.1.1 Types of Problems\n26 Key components of the LERF inspection program include the following areas:\n27 * Structural integrity of the basins.\n28 * Catch basin secondary containment system integrity.\n29 * Evidence of release from basins.\n30 * Safety, communications, and emergency equipment.\n31 Key components of the 200 Area ETF inspection program include the following areas:\n32 * Condition of tanks and ancillary piping.\n33 * Condition of containers.\n34 * Condition of the process control equipment.\n35 * Condition of emergency equipment.\n36 * Condition of secondary containment.\n37 Table 1.1 and Table 1.2 provide a description of LERF and 200 Area ETF items to be inspected.\n38 1.1.1.2 Frequency of Inspections\n39 The frequency of inspections is based on the rate of possible deterioration of equipment and the\n40 probability of a threat to human health or the environment.\n41 The LERF and 200 Area ETF is inspected as indicated in Table 1.1 and Table 1.2.\nAddendum 1.5\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 1.1.2 Specific Process Inspection Requirements\n2 The following sections describe the specific process inspections performed at LERF and 200 Area ETF.\n3 1.1.2.1 Container Inspections\n4 Containers are used at the 200 Area ETF to store solidified secondary waste, such as the powder waste\n5 from the thin film dryer and maintenance and operations waste. When containers are being held in\n6 container storage areas, the following inspection schedule is maintained:\n7 * Daily visual inspection of container storage area for leaks, spills, accumulated liquids, and open\n8 or improperly sealed containers.\n9 * Weekly visual inspection of container labels to ensure labels are not obscured, removed, or\n10 otherwise unreadable.\n11 * Weekly visual inspection for deterioration of containers, containment systems, or cracks in\n12 protective coating or foundations caused by corrosion, mishandling, or other factors.\n13 Following the inspections, an inspection datasheet is signed and dated by the inspector and supervisor.\n14 1.1.2.2 Tank Inspections\n15 A description of the tank systems and ancillary equipment at the 200 Area ETF is given in Addendum C.\n16 Inspections and frequencies are given in Table 1.1 and Table 1.2. This section includes a brief discussion\n17 of the inspections.\n18 1.1.2.2.1 Overfill Protection\n19 Tanks that have the possibility of being overfilled have level instrumentation that alarms before the tanks\n20 reach overflow. High tank level alarms annunciate in the control room, allowing operating personnel to\n21 take immediate action to stop the vessels from overfilling. These alarms are monitored continuously in\n22 the control room during solution transfers.\n23 1.1.2.2.2 Visual Inspections\n24 Visual inspections of tanks and secondary containments are performed to check for leaks, signs of\n25 corrosion or damage, and malfunctioning equipment. Inspections are performed on tanks, secondary\n26 containment within the 200 Area ETF, surge tank, and verification tank, and associated secondary\n27 containment.\n28 1.1.2.2.3 Secondary Containment Leak Detectors\n29 The surge tank and verification tank secondary containment systems have sloped floors that drain\n30 solutions to sumps equipped with leak detectors that alarm in the control room. These alarms are\n31 monitored continuously in the control room during ETF processing operations and at least daily at other\n32 times. If an alarm is activated, further investigation is performed to determine if the source is a tank leak\n33 or other solution (i.e., precipitation).\n34 1.1.2.2.4 Integrity Assessments\n35 The initial integrity assessment was issued in 1995 (Addendum C). Consistent with the recommendations\n36 of the integrity assessment, a periodic integrity assessment program was developed for the 200 Area ETF\n37 tanks and is discussed in detail in Addendum C, Section C.4.2.\n38 1.1.2.2.5 Effluent Treatment Facility Piping\n39 The 200 Area ETF employs an extensive piping system. During inspections at the 200 Area ETF, any\n40 aboveground piping is inspected visually for signs of leakage and for general structural integrity. During\n41 the visual inspection, particular attention is paid to valves and fittings for signs of cracking, deformation,\n42 and leakage.\nAddendum 1.6\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 1.1.2.3 Surface Impoundments and Condition Assessment\n2 The following describes the surface impoundment inspections performed at LERF.\n3 1.1.2.3.1 Overtopping Control\n4 Under current operating conditions, 1.34 meters of freeboard is maintained at each LERF basin, which\n5 corresponds to a normal operating level of 6.1 meters, or 24.6 million liters. Level indicators at each\n6 basin are monitored to confirm that this level is not exceeded.\n7 Before an aqueous waste is transferred into a basin, administrative controls are implemented to ensure\n8 overtopping will not occur during the transfer. The volume of feed to be transferred is compared to the\n9 available volume in the receiving basin. The transfer is not initiated unless there is sufficient volume\n10 available in the receiving basin or a cut-off level is established. The transfer into the basin would be\n11 stopped when this cut-off level is reached.\n12 The LERF basins also are provided with floating very low-density polyethylene covers that are designed\n13 and constructed to prevent overtopping by the introduction of precipitation and dust into the basins.\n14 Overtopping and flow control also are discussed in Addendum C.\n15 1.1.2.3.2 Impoundment Contents\n16 The LERF basins are inspected weekly to assess whether the contents are escaping from a basin. Level\n17 indicators are inspected weekly to check for unaccountable change in the level of the basins.\n18 1.1.2.3.3 Leak Detection\n19 The leachate detection, collection, and removal system is described in Addendum C. The leachate\n20 collection sump pump is activated when the liquid level in the leachate sump reaches a preset level. A\n21 flow meter/totalizer measures the amount of leachate removed. In addition, the timer on the leachate\n22 pump tracks the cumulative pump run time. The leak rate through the primary liner can be determined\n23 using one of two methods: 1) measured as the leachate flow meter/totalizer readings or pump operating\n24 time readings (flow meters/totalizers are located on the outflow line from the collection sumps in the\n25 bottom of the LERF basins) or 2) calculated using the pump operating time readings multiplied by the\n26 pump flow rate (the pump runs at a constant flow rate). Calculations using either method are sufficient for\n27 compliance. If either the flow meter/ totalizer or pump operating time system is not functioning, this is\n28 identified as an abnormal condition (see I.1).The LERF employs a double walled transfer piping between\n29 242-A Evaporator and LERF and between LERF and 200 Area ETF. The WAC 173-303-650 regulations\n30 do not require a discussion of piping for surface impoundments. However, for the purposes of\n31 comprehensive coverage of the LERF, inspections and integrity assessments are performed on the piping\n32 system. Aqueous waste (e.g., process condensate) is transferred from the 242-A Evaporator to the LERF\n33 via a buried pipeline. Likewise, aqueous waste is transferred to the 200 Area ETF via buried pipelines.\n34 At the LERF dikes, aboveground piping serves to transfer waste from one basin to another.\n35 The buried pipelines normally are continuously monitored during transfers by a leak detection system\n36 (Addendum C). The alarms on the leak detection system signal to the 200 Area ETF control room, which\n37 is monitored continuously during waste transfers and daily when no waste is transferring. .As an\n38 alternative to continuous leak detection, the transfer lines can be inspected daily during transfers by\n39 opening the secondary containment drain lines at the LERF catch basins (for 242-A Evaporator transfers\n40 to LERF) and the surge tank (for LERF transfers to 200 Area ETF) to inspect for leakage. During the\n41 routine inspections at LERF, the aboveground piping system is inspected for signs of leakage and for\n42 general structural integrity. During the visual inspection, particular attention is paid to valves and fittings\n43 for signs of cracking, deformation, and leakage.\n44 1.1.2.3.4 Dike Erosion\n45 The LERF basins and dikes are visually inspected weekly and after significant precipitation events for\n46 run-on, run-off, cover integrity, erosion problems, or other signs of deterioration in the dikes from\n47 precipitation, wind, burrowing mammals, or vegetation.\nAddendum 1.7\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 1.1.2.3.5 Structural Integrity\n2 A written certification attesting to the structural integrity of the basin dikes, signed by a qualified,\n3 registered professional engineer, is provided in Addendum C.\n4 1.1.2.3.6 Container Inspection\n5 Normal operation of the LERF does not involve the storage of dangerous waste in containers. Therefore,\n6 the inspection requirements of this section normally are not applicable to the LERF. Any containerized\n7 dangerous waste generated at LERF will be brought to the 200 Area ETF and managed in accordance\n8 with WAC 173-303-630 and is discussed in Section 1.1.3.\n9 1.1.3 Inspection Log\n10 Observations made and deficiencies noted during an inspection are recorded on inspection log sheets (also\n11 called turnover sheets). On completion, the log sheet includes the inspector's printed name, signature,\n12 date, and time; the log sheet is submitted for review and approval by LERF and200 Area ETF\n13 management or their designee, as required by operating procedures. Once approved, the log sheet is kept\n14 in the Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF and 200 Area ETF files. Inspection records are retained\n15 in the Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF and 200 Area ETF files, or other approved locations, in\n16 accordance with Permit Condition 11.1.1. The inspection records are used to help determine any necessary\n17 corrective actions. Problems identified during the inspections are prioritized and addressed in a timely\n18 fashion to mitigate health risks to workers, maintain integrity of the TSD units, and prevent hazards to\n19 public health and the environment.\n20 If while performing an inspection, a leak or spill is discovered, facility operations responds per the\n21 emergency response procedures action is taken to stop the leak and determine the cause. The waste is\n22 removed from the secondary containment in a timely manner that prevents harm to human health and the\n23 environment.\n24 1.1.4 Storage of Ignitable or Reactive Wastes\n25 The LERF could receive an aqueous waste that is designated reactive or ignitable. Any aqueous waste\n26 exhibiting these characteristics is managed (e.g., through blending in LERF) such that the waste no longer\n27 exhibits the reactive or ignitable characteristics.\n28 Though unlikely, the 200 Area ETF secondary wastes might have the characteristics of being reactive or\n29 ignitable. A qualified inspector performs annual fire inspections of the 200 Area ETF using a checklist\n30 developed specifically for facilities that handle dangerous and/or mixed waste.\n31\nAddendum 1.8\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nTable 1.1. Visual Inspection Schedule for the LERF and 200 Area ETF\nItem Inspection Frequency\nLoad-In Facility\nLoad-In tank system Inspect area for leaks. Note any unusual noises or vibration from the Daily\nsystem pumps. Inspect secondary containment system for signs of\ndeterioration.\nMain Treatment Train\nSurge tank system Inspect area for leaks. Note any unusual noises or vibration from the Daily\nsystem pumps. Inspect secondary containment system for signs of\ndeterioration.\nRough filter Inspect for leaks. Daily\nUltraviolet oxidation Inspect module for leaks Daily\nsystem Inspect peroxide storage tank, ancillary equipment for leaks.\npH adjustment tank Inspect tank and ancillary equipment for leaks Daily\nH202 decomposer Inspect tank and ancillary equipment for leaks Daily\nFine filter Inspect module for leaks Daily\nDegasification system Inspect module for leaks. Note any unusual noises or vibration from the Daily\ndegasification blower.\nReverse osmosis system Inspect tanks and ancillary equipment for leaks. Note any unusual noises Daily\nor vibration from the system pumps.\nPolishers Inspect tanks and ancillary equipment for leaks. Daily\nEffluent pH adjustment Inspect tank and ancillary equipment for leaks. Daily\ntank\nVerification tanks Inspect tanks and ancillary equipment for leaks. Note any unusual noises Daily\nor vibration from the system pumps. Inspect secondary containment\nsystem for signs of deterioration.\nSecondary Treatment Train\nSecondary waste Inspect tank and ancillary equipment for leaks Daily\nreceiving tank\nETF evaporator Inspect tank and equipment for leaks. Note any unusual noises or Daily\nvibration from the system pumps or compressor.\nConcentrate tank Inspect tank and ancillary equipment for leaks. Daily\nThin film dryer Inspect tanks and ancillary equipment for leaks (viewed through camera). Daily\nNote any unusual noises or vibration from the system pumps or blower.\nContainer handling Inspect area for spills, leaks, accumulated liquids. Daily\nContainer handling Inspect for deterioration of containers and secondary containment, Weekly\nincluding corrosion and cracks in secondary containment foundation and\ncoating. Inspect container labels to ensure that they are readable.\nSupport Systems\nVessel ventilation Inspect filters (HEPA and pre-filters), check vessel off gas pressures, Daily\nsystem system flow, and discharge temperatures.\nSump tank system Inspect sump trenches for unexpected liquids, which indicate spills or Daily\nleaks from process equipment.\nSafety Systems\nEye wash stations Check status; check for adequate pressure Monthly\nSafety showers Check status; check for adequate pressure Monthly\nAddendum 1.9\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nEmergency Systems\nFire extinguishers Check for adequate charge. Monthly\nEmergency lighting Test operability. Monthly\nProcessing Area\nUninterruptible power Check output voltage and visually inspect battery pack for corrosion and Annually\nsupply leakage. Check indicator lights for fault conditions.\nLERF (Surface Impoundment)\nLERF basins and dikes Check to overtopping controls and integrity of the basins and dikes Weekly\nLERF contents Check basin level indicators for unaccountable changes in the level of the Weekly\nbasins\nLeak Detections Determine the leak rate per wetted surface area Weekly\nLERF basins and dikes Check for run-on, run-off, cover integrity, erosion problems, and other Weekly &\nsigns of deterioration After\nsignificant\nprecipitation\nevents\nIgnitable and Reactive\nIgnitable and reactive Storage in compliance with Hanford Site fire protection standards and Annuallyt\nwaste I WAC 173-303-630(8)\nContainer Storage Areas Other Than Secondary Treatment Train\nContainer Storage Container labels to ensure labels are not obscured, removed, or otherwise Weekly\nunreadable\nDeterioration of containers, containment systems, or cracks in protective Weekly\ncoating or foundations caused by corrosion, mishandling, or other factors\nLeaks, spills, and accumulated liquids Daily\nHEPA -High efficiency particulate air\nt When waste management activities occur\nAddendum 1.10\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nTable 1.2. Inspection Plan for Instrumentation Monitoring\nItem Inspection Frequency*\nLoad-In Facility\nLevel alarm Monitor liquid level in load-in tanks TK-109 and TK- 117 to prevent Continuously\nLAHH-59A-109/-117 overflow\nLevel alarm Monitor liquid level in load-in tanks TK-1 to prevent overflow Continuously\nLSH-59A-003\nLeak detector Monitor for leakage in the load-in tank pit sump Continuously\nMain Treatment Train\nLeak detector Monitor for leakage in the surge tank drainage sump Continuously\nLAH-20B009\nLevel alarm Monitor surge tank level to prevent overflow Continuously\nLAH-60A013\nLevel alarm Monitor liquid levels in the pH adjustment tank to prevent overflow Continuously\nLAHL-60C-1 11\nLevel alarm Monitor liquid levels in the first RO feed tank to prevent overflow Continuously\nLAHL-60F-101\nLevel alarm Monitor liquid levels in the second RO feed tank to prevent overflow Continuously\nLAHL-60F-201\nLevel alarms Monitor liquid levels in the effluent pH adjustment tank to prevent Continuously\nLAHL-60F-211 overflow\nLevel transmitter Monitor liquid level in verification tanks to prevent overflow Continuously\nLAHX-60H001A/B/C\nLeak detector Monitor for leakage in the verification tank drainage sump Continuously\nLAH-20B010\nSecondary Treatment Train\nLevel alarm Monitor liquid levels in secondary waste receiver tanks A and B to Continuously\nLAHL-601-00 1 A/B prevent overflow.\nLevel alarm Monitor liquid levels in concentrate tanks A and B to prevent Continuously\nLAHL-60J-00 1 A/B overflow.\nLevel alarm Monitor liquid levels in the evaporator tank to prevent overflow. Continuously\nLAHL-601-107\nLevel alarm Monitor liquid levels in the spray condenser tank to prevent overflow. Continuously\nLAHL-60J-036\nLevel alarm Monitor liquid levels in the distillate flash tank to prevent overflow. Continuously\nLAHL-601-108\nLevel alarm Monitor liquid levels in the entrainment separator tank to prevent Continuously\nLAH-601-119 overflow.\nLevel transmitter Monitor liquid level in sump tank No. I to prevent overflow. Continuously\nLAH-20B001\nLevel transmitter Monitor liquid level in sump tank No. 2 to prevent overflow. Continuously\nLAH-20B002\nLeak detector Monitor for leakage to sump No. 1. Continuously**\nLAH-20B003\nAddendum 1.11\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nLeak detector Monitor for leakage to sump No. 2. Continuously**\nLAH-20B005\nLeak detector Monitor for leakage from pipeline between 200 Area ETF and load in Continuously**\nstation.\nLeak detector Monitor for leakage from pipeline between 200 Area ETF and LERF. Continuously**\nLeak detector Monitor for leakage from pipeline between LERF and the 242-A Continuously**\nEvaporator.\n* Frequency of \"continuously\" applies during ETF processing operations and/or Load-in Station transfers. Data from alarms,\nleak detectors, and level transmitters is monitored in the control room at least daily at other times, even though many of these\ninstruments record continuously (see C.2.5.1). Emergency communications equipment and warning systems (e.g. fire alarms,\ntake cover alarms, and evacuation alarms) are included in addendum J, Contingency Plan. These alarms are monitored\ncontinuously and the response to these alarms do not rely on personnel being present the ETF control room.\n** In the event of a malfunction of one of the electronic leak detectors, daily visual inspections will be performed while the\nfacilities are in operation.\nAddendum 1.12\n NI\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n2 ADDENDUMJ\n3 CONTINGENCY PLAN\n4\n5\nAddendum J.i\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum J.ii\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1\n2 ADDENDUMJ\n3 CONTINGENCY PLAN\n4\n5\n6 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n7 J. CONTINGENCY PLAN.....................5............ .............. 5\n8 J.1 Building Evacuation Routing.................7............. ............... 7\n9 J.2 Building Emergency Director ............................................... 7\n10 J.3 Implementation of the Plan ............................................... 7\n11 J.3.1 Protective Actions Responses ............... ........ 6 ........8\n12 J.3.2 Response to Facility Operations Emergencies .................................... 11\n13 J.3.3 Prevention of Recurrence or Spread of Fires, Explosions, or Releases ....... ........... 13\n14 J.3.4 Incident Recovery and Restart of Operations ................................... 13\n15 J.3.5 Incompatible Waste ................................. .............. 13\n16 J.3.6 Post Emergency Equipment Maintenance and Decontamination .................. 14\n17 J.4 Emergency Equipment .......................................... ....... 14\n18 J.4.1 Fixed Emergency Equipment.............................................. 14\n19 J.4.2 Portable Emergency Equipment .................................. ......... 14\n20 J.4.3 Communications Equipment/Warning Systems ..................................... 15\n21 J.4.4 Personal Protective Equipment ..................... ................ 15\n22 J.4.5 Spill Control and Containment Supplies............. ................... ..... 15\n23 J.4.6 Incident Command Post................ .................... .......... 15\n24 J.5 Required Reports ..................................................... 16\n25 J.6 Plan Location and Amendments ............................................... 16\n26 J.7 Facility/Building Emergency Response Organization .................... ......... 16\n27\n28 FIGURES\n29 Figure J.1 Evacuation Routes from 2025E ........... 9.............. ............... 9\n30 Figure J.2. LERF and 200 Area ETF Site Plan ....................................... 10\n31\n32 TABLE\n33 Table J. 1. Hanford Facility Documents Containing Contingency Plan Requirements of\n34 WAC 173-303-350(3) ............ 5..................................5\n35\nAddendum J.iii\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\nAddendum J.iv\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI J. CONTINGENCY PLAN\n2 The requirements for a contingency plan at the Liquid Effluent Retention Facility (LERF)/200 Area\n3 Effluent Treatment Facility (ETF) are satisfied in the following documents: portions of Hanford Facility\n4 Permit (Permit) Attachment 4, Hanford Emergency Management Plan (DOE/RL-94-02) and this\n5 Addendum.\n6 The unit specific building emergency plan also serves to satisfy a broad range of other requirements\n7 [e.g., Occupational Safety and Health Administration standards (29 CFR 191029 Code of Federal\n8 Regulations [CFR1 1910), Toxic Substance Control Act of 1976 (40 CFR 761) and U.S. Department of\n9 Energy Orders]. Therefore, revisions made to portions of this unit specific building emergency plan that\n10 are not governed by the requirements of Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-303 will not be\n11 considered as a modification subject to WAC 173-303-830 or Permit Condition I.C.3.\n12 Table J.1 identifies the sections of the unit specific building emergency plan written to meet\n13 WAC 173-303-350(3) contingency plan requirements. In addition, Section 12.0 of the unit specific\n14 building emergency plan is written to meet WAC 173-303 requirements identifying where copies of\n15 Permit Attachment 4, Hanford Emergency Management Plan (DOE/RL-94-02) and the building\n16 emergency plan are located and maintained on the Hanford Facility. Therefore, revisions to Addendum J\n17 require a modification subject to WAC 173-303-830 and/or Permit Condition I.C.3.\nTable J.1. Hanford Facility Documents Containing Contingency Plan Requirements of\nWAC 173-303-350(3)\nRequirement Permit Building Part III, OU-3,\nAttachment 4, Emergency Plan' LERF &\nHanford (HNF-IP-0263- 200 Area ETF,\nEmergency ETF) Addendum J\nManagement\nPlan (DOE/RL-\n94-02)\n-350(3)(a) -A description of the actions, which VVX\nfacility personnel must take to comply with this Section 1.3.4 Sections 7.1, 7.2 Sections J.3.1,\nsection and WAC 173-303-360. through 7.2.5, and J.3.2, through\n7.33 J.3.2.5, and J.3.3'\nSections 4.0 Sections J.3, J.3.4,\n(1St paragraph), 8.2, J.3.5, J.3.6, and J.5\n8.3, 8.4, 11.0\n-350(3)(b) -A description of the actions which X X2,4 X2,4\nshall be taken in the event that a dangerous Section 1.3.4 Section 7.2.5.1 Section J.3.2.5.1\nwaste shipment, which is damaged or otherwise\npresents a hazard to the public health and the\nenvironment, arrives at the facility, and is not\nacceptable to the owner or operator, but cannot\nbe transported pursuant to the requirements of\nWAC 173-303-370(5), Manifest system, reasons\nfor not accepting dangerous waste shipments.\n-350(3)(c) -A description of the arrangements X\nagreed to by local police departments, fire Sections 3.2.3,\ndepartments, hospitals, contractors, and state and 3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.4,\nlocal emergency response teams to coordinate 3.4.1.1, 3.4.1.2,\nemergency services as required in 3.4.1.3, 3.7, and\nWAC 173-303-340(4). Table 3-1\nAddendum J.5\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nTable J.1. Hanford Facility Documents Containing Contingency Plan Requirements of\nWAC 173-303-350(3)\nRequirement Permit Building Part III, OU-3,\nAttachment 4, Emergency Plan' LERF &\nHanford (HNF-IP-0263- 200 Area ETF,\nEmergency ETF) Addendum J\nManagement\nPlan (DOE/RL-\n94-02)\n-350(3)(d) -A current list of names, addresses, X Xs\nand phone numbers (office and home) of all Section 3.1, 13.0 Sections J.2 and J.7\npersons qualified to act as the emergency\ncoordinator required under\nWAC 173-303-360(1). Where more than one\nperson is listed, one must be named as primary\nemergency coordinator, and others must be listed\nin the order in which they will assume\nresponsibility as alternates. For new facilities\nonly, this list may be provided to the department\nat the time of facility certification (as required\nby WAC 173-303-810(14)(a)(I)), rather than as\npart of the permit application.\n-350(3)(e) -A list of all emergency equipment at X X\nthe facility (such as fire extinguishing systems, Section 9.0 Section J.4\nspill control equipment, communications and\nalarm systems, and decontamination equipment),\nwhere this equipment is required. This list must\nbe kept up to date. In addition, the plan must\ninclude the location and a physical description of\neach item on the list, and a brief outline of its\ncapabilities.\n-350(3)(f) -An evacuation plan for facility X6 X7 X7\npersonnel where there is a possibility that Figure 7-3 and Section 1.5 Section J.1\nevacuation could be necessary. This plan must Table 5-1\ndescribe the signal(s) to be used to begin\nevacuation, evacuation routes, and alternate\nevacuation routes.\nI An \"X\" indicates requirement applies.\n2 1 Portions of Permit Attachment 4, Hanford Emergency Management Plan (DOE/RL-94-02) not enforceable through Appendix A\n3 of that document are not made enforceable by reference in the building emergency plan.\n4 2Permit Attachment 4, Hanford Emergency Management Plan (DOE/RL-94-02) contains descriptions of actions relating to the\n5 Hanford Site Emergency Preparedness System. No additional description of actions are required if at the site level. If other\n6 credible scenarios exist or if emergency procedures at the unit are different, the description of actions contained in the building\n7 emergency plan will be used during an event by a building emergency director.\n8 3Sections J.1, J.2 through J.2.5, and J.3 of the building emergency plan are those sections subject to the Class 2 \"Changes in\n9 emergency procedures (i.e., spill or release response procedures)\" described in WAC 173-303-830, Appendix I, Section B.6.a.\n10 4This requirement only applies to TSD units, which receive shipment of dangerous or mixed waste defined as off-site shipments\n11 in accordance with WAC 173-303.\n12 'Emergency Coordinator names and home telephone numbers are maintained separate from any contingency plan document, on\n13 file in accordance with Permit Condition II.A.4 and are updated, at a minimum, monthly.\n14 6The Hanford Facility (site wide) signals are provided in this document. No unit/building signal information is required unless\n15 unique devices are used at the unit/building.\n16 'An evacuation route for the TSD unit must be provided. Evacuation routes for occupied buildings surrounding the TSD unit are\n17 provided through information boards posted within buildings.\nAddendum J.6\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 J.1 Building Evacuation Routing\n2 Figures J.1 and J.2 provide identification of the primary and secondary staging areas and a general layout\n3 of the 2025E and ETF/LERF. Alternate evacuation routes will be used on a case-by-case basis based on\n4 meteorological conditions at the time of the event.\n5 J.2 Building Emergency Director\n6 Emergency response will be directed by the Building Emergency Director (BED) until the Incident\n7 Commander (IC) arrives. The Incident Command System and staff with supporting on-call personnel\n8 fulfill the responsibilities of the Emergency Coordinator as discussed in WAC 173-303-360.\n9 During events, ETF/LERF personnel perform response duties under the direction of the BED. The\n10 Incident Command Post (ICP) is managed by the senior Hanford Fire Department official, unless the\n11 event is determined to be primarily a security event, in which case the Hanford Fire Department and\n12 Hanford Patrol will operate under a unified command system with Hanford Patrol making all decisions\n13 pertaining to security. These individuals are designated as the IC and as such, have the authority to\n14 request and obtain any resources necessary for protecting people and the environment. The BED\n15 becomes a member of the ICP and functions under the direction of the IC. In this role, the BED continues\n16 to manage and direct LERF/ETF operations.\n17 A listing of BEDs by title, work location, and work telephone numbers is contained in Section J.7 of this\n18 plan. The BED is on the premises or is available through an \"on-call\" list 24 hours a day. Names and\n19 home telephone numbers of the BEDs are available from the Patrol Operations Center (POC) in\n20 accordance with Permit Condition II.A.4.\n21 J.3 Implementation of the Plan\n22 In accordance with WAC 173-303-360(2)(b) the BED ensures that trained personnel identify the\n23 character, source, amount, and areal extent of the release, fire, or explosion to the extent possible.\n24 Identification of waste can be made by activities that can include, but are not limited to, visual inspection\n25 of involved containers, sampling activities in the field, reference to inventory records, or by consulting\n26 with facility personnel. Samples of materials involved in an emergency might be taken by qualified\n27 personnel and analyzed as appropriate. These activities must be performed with a sense of immediacy\n28 and shall include available information.\n29 The BED shall use the following guidelines to determine if an event has met the requirements of\n30 WAC 173-303-360(2)(d):\n31 1. The event involved an unplanned spill, release, fire, or explosion,\n32 AND\n33 2.a The unplanned spill or release involved a dangerous waste, or the material involved became a\n34 dangerous waste as a result of the event (e.g., product that is not recoverable.), or\n35 2.b The unplanned fire or explosion occurred at the ETF/LERF or transportation activity subject\n36 to RCRA contingency planning requirements,\n37 AND\n38 3. Time urgent response from an emergency services organization was required to mitigate the\n39 event or a threat to human health or the environment exists.\n40 As soon as possible, after stabilizing event conditions, the BED shall determine, in consultation with the\n41 site contractor environmental single point-of-contact, if notification to the Washington State Department\n42 of Ecology (Ecology) is needed to meet WAC 173-303-360(2)(d) reporting requirements. If all of the\n43 conditions under 1, 2, and 3 are met, notifications are to be made to Ecology. Additional information is\n44 found in Permit Attachment 4, Hanford Emergency Management Plan, (DOE/RL-94-02), Section 4.2.\n45\nAddendum J.7\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI If review of all available information does not yield a definitive assessment of the danger posed by the\n2 incident, a worst-case condition will be presumed and appropriate protective actions and notifications will\n3 be initiated. The BED is responsible for initiating any protective actions based on their best judgment of\n4 the incident.\n5 The BED must assess each incident to determine the response necessary to protect the personnel, facility,\n6 and the environment. If assistance from Hanford Patrol, Hanford Fire Department, or ambulance units is\n7 required, the Hanford Emergency Response Number (911 from site office phones/373-091 1 from cellular\n8 phones) must be used to contact the POC and request the desired assistance. To request other resources\n9 or assistance from outside the ETF/LERF, the POC business number is 373-3800.\n10 J.3.1 Protective Actions Responses\n11 Protective action responses are discussed in the following sections. The steps identified in the following\n12 description of actions do not have to be performed in sequence because of the unanticipated sequence of\n13 incident events.\n14 J.3.1.1 Evacuation\n15 The objective of a facility evacuation order is to limit personnel exposure to hazardous materials or\n16 dangerous/mixed waste by increasing the distance between personnel and the hazard. The scope of the\n17 evacuation includes evacuation of the facility because of an event at the facility as well as evacuation of\n18 the facility in response to a site evacuation order. Evacuation will be directed by the BED when\n19 conditions warrant and will apply to all personnel not actively involved in the event response or\n20 emergency plan related activities.\n21 The BED will initiate the evacuation by directing an announcement be made to evacuate along with the\n22 evacuation location over a public address system, facility radios, and, as conditions warrant, by activating\n23 the 200 Area site evacuation alarms by calling the POC using 911 from site office phones/373-09 11 from\n24 cellular phones. Personnel proceed to a predetermined staging area (shown in Figure J.2), or other safe\n25 upwind location, as determined by the BED. The BED will determine the operating configuration of the\n26 facility and identify any additional protective actions to limit personnel exposure to the hazard.\n27 Emergency organization personnel or assigned operations personnel will conduct a sweep of occupied\n28 buildings to ensure that all non-essential personnel and visitors have evacuated. For an immediate\n29 evacuation, accountability will be performed at the staging area. The BED will assign personnel as\n30 accountability aides and staging managers with the responsibility to ensure that evacuation actions are\n31 taken at all occupied buildings at the ETF/LERF. All implementing actions executed by the\n32 aides/managers are directed by the emergency response procedures. When evacuation actions are\n33 complete, the aides/managers will provide a status report to the BED. The BED will provide status to the\n34 IC.\n35\nAddendum J.8\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nMain Floor\nAreaOnmaStoage rea 50% 2 2Surge\nTank\n90 0 [O] a hoo\ngo0\n2nd Floor\n1 Figure J.1 Evacuation Routes from 2025E\n2\nAddendum J.9\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nFigure J.2. LERF and 200 Area ETF Site Plan\nToTEDFPond\nin\n..... ..... .. .. .. L O-727\nLI~ii~iil iTrailer\nLoad-i-E24A7\nFacility24A 7-\nInstrument,\nI I MO-251* Stagitgging\nn Ae MStorage\nBuilding\naL\nTo 18A Canton Avenue To 200E\nETF or LERF site evacuation routes will be determined by the Building\nEmergency Director dependent on event location and wind direction\nAddendum J.10\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI J.3.1.2 Take Cover\n2 The objective of the take cover order is to limit personnel exposure to hazardous materials, or\n3 dangerous/mixed waste when evacuation is inappropriate or not practical. Evacuation might not be\n4 practical or appropriate because of extreme weather conditions or the material release might limit the\n5 ability to evacuate safely personnel.\n6 The BED will initiate the take cover by directing an announcement be made over the public address\n7 system, facility radios, and, as conditions warrant, by activating the 200 Area site take cover alarms by\n8 calling the POC using 911 from site office phones/373-091 I from cellular phones). Actions to complete a\n9 facility take-cover will be directed by the emergency response procedure. Protective actions associated\n10 with operations include configuring, or shutting down, the ventilation systems. Determination of\n11 additional take cover response is based on plant operating configuration, weather conditions, amount and\n12 duration of release, and other conditions, as applicable to the event and associated hazard. As a\n13 minimum, personnel exposure to the hazard will be minimized. The BED will assign personnel as\n14 accountability aides with responsibility to ensure that take-cover actions are taken at all occupied\n15 buildings at the ETF complex. All implementing actions executed by the aides/managers are directed by\n16 the emergency response procedure. When take cover actions are complete, the aides/manager will\n17 provide the BED with a status report.\n18 J.3.2 Response to Facility Operations Emergencies\n19 Depending on the severity of the following events, the BED reviews the site wide procedures and\n20 ETF/LERF emergency response procedure(s) and, as required, categorizes and/or classifies the event. If\n21 necessary, the BED initiates area protective actions and Hanford Site Emergency Response Organization\n22 activation. The steps identified in the following description of actions do not have to be performed in\n23 sequence because of the unanticipated sequence of incident events.\n24 J.3.2.1 Loss of Utilities\n25 A case-by-case evaluation is required for each event to determine loss of utility impacts. When a BED\n26 determines a loss of utility impact, actions are taken to ensure dangerous and/or mixed waste is being\n27 properly managed, to the extent possible given event circumstances. As necessary, the BED will stop\n28 operations and take appropriate actions until the utility is restored.\n29 J.3.2.2 Major Process Disruption/Loss of Plant Control\n30 The hazards assessment has determined that this occurrence does not pose significant risk to human\n31 health or the environment.\n32 J.3.2.3 Pressure Release\n33 The hazards assessment has determined that a pressure release does not pose significant risk to human\n34 health or the environment. Hazardous material release and dangerous/mixed waste releases are addressed\n35 in Section J.2.5.\n36 J.3.2.4 Fire andlor Explosion\n37 In the event, of a fire, the discoverer activates a fire alarm (pull box); calls 911 from site office\n38 phones/373-0911 from cellular phones or verifies that the Hanford Emergency Response Number has\n39 been called. Automatic initiation of a fire alarm (through the smoke detectors, and sprinkler systems) is\n40 also possible.\n41 * Unless otherwise instructed, personnel shall evacuate the area/building by the nearest safe exit\n42 and proceed to the designated staging area for accountability.\n43 * On actuation of the fire alarm, ONLY if time permits, personnel should shut down equipment,\n44 secure waste, and lock up classified materials (or hand carry them out). The alarm automatically\n45 signals the Hanford Fire Department.\nAddendum J. 11\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\n1 * The BED proceeds directly to the ICP, obtains all necessary information pertaining to the\n2 incident, and sends a representative to meet Hanford Fire Department.\n3 * The BED provides a formal turnover to the IC when the IC arrives at the ICP.\n4 * The BED informs the Hanford Site Emergency Response Organization as to the extent of the\n5 emergency (including estimates of dangerous waste and mixed waste quantities released to the\n6 environment).\n7 * If operations are stopped in response to the fire, the BED ensures that systems are monitored for\n8 leaks, pressure buildup, gas generation, and ruptures.\n9 * Hanford Fire Department firefighters extinguish the fire as necessary.\n10 Note: Following a fire and/or explosion, WAC 173-303-640(7) will be addressed for the ETF regarding\n11 fitness for use.\n12 J.3.2.5 Hazardous Material, Dangerous andlor Mixed Waste Spill\n13 Spills can result from many sources including process leaks, container spills or leaks, damaged packages\n14 or shipments, or personnel error. Spills of mixed waste are complicated by the need to deal with the extra\n15 hazards posed by the presence of Atomic Energy Act materials. These controls include containment\n16 berms, dedicated spill control sumps, remote gauges, and level indicators as well as spray shields on\n17 chemical pipe flanges. WRPS procedures provide alarm response and maintenance actions for leak\n18 detection equipment, surveillance of possible leak locations, and response actions for detected spills.\n19 * The discoverer notifies BED and initiates SWIMS response:\n20 Stops work\n21 Warns others in the vicinity\n22 Isolates the area\n23 Minimizes the exposure to the hazards\n24 Requests the BED Secure ventilation\n25 * If Operations are stopped, the BED ensures that the plant is put in a safe shutdown configuration.\n26 * The BED determines if emergency conditions exist requiring response from the Hanford Fire\n27 Department based on classification of the spill and injured personnel, and evaluates need to\n28 perform additional protective actions.\n29 * If the Hanford Fire Department resources are not needed, the spill is mitigated with resources\n30 identified in Section J.4 of this plan and proper notifications are made.\n31 * If the Hanford Fire Department resources are needed, the BED calls 911 from site office\n32 phones/373-091 I from cellular phones.\n33 * The BED sends a representative to meet the Hanford Fire Department.\n34 * The BED provides a formal turnover to the IC when the IC arrives at the ICP.\n35 * The BED informs the Hanford Site Emergency Response Organization as to the extent of the\n36 emergency (including estimates of dangerous waste and mixed waste quantities released to the\n37 environment).\n38 * If operations are stopped in response to the spill, the BED ensures that systems are monitored for\n39 leaks, pressure buildup, gas generation, and ruptures.\n40 * Hanford Fire Department stabilizes the spill.\n41 Note: For response to leaks or spills and disposition of leaking or unfit-for-use tank systems, refer to\n42 WAC 173-303-640(7).\nAddendum J.12\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI J.3.2.5.1 Damaged, or Unacceptable Shipments\n2 During the course of receiving an onsite transfer of dangerous and/or mixed waste at ETF/LERF an\n3 unanticipated event could be discovered resulting in a conformance issue concerning the waste.\n4 Damaged or unacceptable shipments resulting from onsite transfers are not subject to WAC 173-303-370\n5 however conformance issues must be resolved in order to maintain proper records.\n6 The following actions are taken to resolve the conformance issue:\n7 * Operations management is notified of the damaged or unacceptable waste to be received.\n8 * If the conformance issue results in a spill or release, actions described in Section J.3.2.5 are taken.\n9 * The generating organization is notified of the conformance issue.\n10 An operations representative, in conjunction with the generating organization, determines the course of\n11 action to resolve the conformance issue.\n12 J.3.3 Prevention of Recurrence or Spread of Fires, Explosions, or Releases\n13 The BED, as part of the ICP, takes the steps necessary to ensure that a secondary release, fire, or\n14 explosion does not occur. The BED will take measures, where applicable, to stop processes and\n15 operations, collect and contain released waste, and remove or isolate containers. The BED also monitors\n16 for leaks, pressure buildups, gas generation, or ruptures in valves, pipes, or other equipment, whenever\n17 this is appropriate.\n18 J.3.4 Incident Recovery and Restart of Operations\n19 A recovery plan is developed when necessary in accordance with Permit Attachment 4, Hanford\n20 Emergency Management Plan, (DOE/RL-94-02), Section 9.2. A recovery plan is needed following an\n21 event where further risk could be introduced to personnel, the ETF/LERF, or the environment through\n22 recovery action and/or to maximize the preservation of evidence.\n23 If this plan was implemented according to Section J.3 of this plan, Ecology is notified before operations\n24 can resume. The Permit Attachment 4, Hanford Emergency Management Plan, (DOE/RL-94-02),\n25 Section 5.1 discusses different reports to outside agencies. This notification is in addition to those\n26 required reports and includes the following statements:\n27 * There are no incompatibility issues with the waste and released materials from the incident.\n28 * All the equipment has been cleaned, fit for its intended use, and placed back into service.\n29 The notification required by WAC 173-303-360(2)0) may be made via telephone conference. Additional\n30 information that Ecology requests regarding these restart conditions will be included in the required\n31 15-day report identified in Section J.5 of this plan.\n32 For emergencies not involving activation of the Hanford EOC, the BED ensures that conditions are\n33 restored to normal before operations are resumed. If the Hanford Site Emergency Response Organization\n34 was activated and the emergency phase is complete, a special recovery organization could be appointed at\n35 the discretion of RL to restore conditions to normal. This process is detailed in RL and contractor\n36 emergency procedures. The makeup of this organization depends on the extent of the damage and the\n37 effects. The onsite recovery organization will be appointed by the appropriate contractor's management.\n38 J.3.5 Incompatible Waste\n39 After an event, the BED or the onsite recovery organization ensures that no waste that might be\n40 incompatible with the released material is treated, stored, and/or disposed of until cleanup is completed.\n41 Cleanup actions are taken by ETF/LERF personnel or other assigned personnel. Permit Attachment 4,\n42 Hanford Emergency Management Plan, (DOE/RL-94-02), Section 9.2.3, describes actions to be taken.\nAddendum J.13\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI Waste from cleanup activities is designated and managed as newly generated waste. A field check for\n2 compatibility before storage is performed as necessary. Incompatible wastes are not placed in the same\n3 container. Containers of waste are placed in storage areas appropriate for their compatibility class.\n4 If incompatibility of wastes was a factor in the incident, the BED or the onsite recovery organization\n5 ensures that the cause is corrected.\n6 J.3.6 Post Emergency Equipment Maintenance and Decontamination\n7 All equipment used during an incident is decontaminated (if practicable) or disposed of as spill debris.\n8 Decontaminated equipment is checked for proper operation before storage for subsequent use.\n9 Consumable and disposed materials are restocked. Fire extinguishers are replaced.\n10 The BED ensures that all equipment is cleaned and fit for its intended use before operations are resumed.\n11 Depleted stocks of neutralizing and absorbing materials are replenished; protective clothing is cleaned or\n12 disposed of and restocked, etc.\n13 J.4 Emergency Equipment\n14 Emergency resources and equipment for the ETF/LERF are presented in this section.\n15 J.4.1 Fixed Emergency Equipment\nTYPE LOCATION CAPABILITY\nSafety shower/ eye wash stations 1 -2025E Rm 122 Decon Station Assist in flushing chemicals/\n(ETF only) 1 -2025E South Wall of Process Area materials from the body and/ or\n1- 2025E Rm 131 eyes and face of personnel.\n1- 2025E Rm 134\n1 -Outside south 2025E near acid/\ncaustic tanks\n1 -Outside at Load-in station\nI- 2025E Rm 112 Laboratory\nWet pipe sprinkler Throughout the ETF except those areas Assist in the control of a fire.\n(ETF only) protected by preactive sprinklers\nPreactive sprinkler (ETF only) Control room, communications room, Assist in the control of a fire.\nelectrical equipment room Maintained dry to prevent\naccidental damage to equipment\nFire alarm pull boxes All high traffic areas in operations Activate the local fire alarm\n(ETF only) administration and support areas, truck\nbay, and process area\nE-lights Throughout ETF 1 hour temporary lighting\n16 J.4.2 Portable Emergency Equipment\nTYPE LOCATION CAPABILITY\nFire extinguisher Throughout ETF Fire suppression for Class A, B, and\nABC type (Administrative/Support areas), LERF, and C fires\nTEDF\nFire extinguisher Throughout ETF Fire suppression for Class B and C\nBC type (process area and electrical room) fires\nPortable safety showers As needed for special evolutions and Assist in flushing chemicals/\nand Eye Wash Stations maintenance materials from the body and/or eyes\nand face of personnel.\nAddendum J.14\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nJ.4.3 Communications Equipment/Warning Systems\nTYPE LOCATION CAPABILITY\nFire alarms Corridors, locker rooms, process area, drum Audible throughout ETF\n(ETF only) storage, and truck bay\nTake cover/evacuation Throughout the ETF Audible outside buildings and inside\nadministrative buildings\nPublic address system Throughout the ETF Audible throughout ETF\n(ETF Only)\nPortable radios Operations and maintenance personnel Communication to control room\nTelephone ETF- control room, 2025E, 2025EA offices, Internal and external\nMO-148, MO-269, MO-251, communications. Allows\n2025EC71. notification of outside resources\nLERF- MO-727 and 242AL71 instrument (POC, HFD, Hanford Patrol, etc.\nbuilding, LERF Garage 242AL1 1\nTEDF- 225E(pump house 1), 225W (pump\nhouse 2), 6653 (sample building),\n6653A (pump house 3)\n2 Note: Sitewide communications and warning systems are identified in Permit Attachment 4, Hanford\n3 Emergency Management Plan, (DOE/RL-94-02), Table 5.1.\n4 J.4.4 Personal Protective Equipment\nTYPE LOCATION CAPABILITY\nAcid suits In the spill response cabinets in 2025E Chemical protection for personnel during\ncontainment and isolation\nRespirators 2025E, 1st Floor Filtered air for recovery of known hazards\n5 J.4.5 Spill Control and Containment Supplies\nSPILL KITS AND SPILL CONTROL EQUIPMENT\nTYPE LOCATION CAPABILITY\nSpill bags, drums, carts, 4 -2025E in process area Support containment and\netc. 1 -TEDF 6653 Disposal Building cleanup of hazardous material\n1 -2025E upper level process area spills\n1 -2025E Rm 125A\n1 -2025ED Load-In Station CONEX\nSpill response cabinet I -2025E Rm 122 Support equipment for spill\n2 -container storage CONEX East of 2025E response\nbuilding within the TSD unit boundary\n1 -TEDF 6653 Disposal Building\nI -MO-727 Change Trailer\n1 -outside southeast side of 2025E\n6 J.4.6 Incident Command Post\n7 The ICPs for the ETF/LERF are in ETF control room or 2025 EA. Emergency resource materials are\n8 stored at each location. The IC could activate the Hanford Fire Department Mobile Command Unit if\n9 necessary.\nAddendum J.15\n WA7890008967\nLERF and 200 Area ETF\nI J.5 Required Reports\n2 Post incident, written reports are required for certain incidents on the Hanford Site. The reports are\n3 described in Permit Attachment 4, Hanford Emergency Management Plan, (DOE/RL-94-02), Section 5.1.\n4 Facility management must note in the Hanford Facility Operating Record, LERF & 200 Area ETF File,\n5 the time, date and details of any incident that requires implementation of the contingency plan (refer to\n6 Section J.3). Within fifteen (15) days after the incident, a written report must be submitted to Ecology.\n7 The report must include the elements specified in WAC 173-303-360(2)(k).\n8 J.6 Plan Location and Amendments\n9 Copies of this plan are maintained at the following locations:\n10 * ETF control room\n11 * Building 2025EA ICP\n12 This plan will be reviewed and immediately amended as necessary, in accordance with Permit\n13 Attachment 4, Hanford Emergency Management Plan, (DOE/RL-94-02), Section 14.3.1.1.\n14 J.7 Facility/Building Emergency Response Organization\nETF/LERF Building Emergency Directors\nTITLE WORK LOCATION WORK PHONE\nShift Operation Manager (SOM) 2025E Building 373-9000 or 373-9500\n15 Names and home telephone numbers of the BEDs are available from the POC (373-3800) in accordance\n16 with Permit Condition II.A.4.\nAddendum J.16\n WA7 89000 8967, Change Control Log\nHanford Federal Facility RCRA Permit Dangerous Waste Portion\nPUREX\nChange Control Log\nChange Control Logs ensure that changes to this unit are performed in a methodical, controlled, coordinated\nand transparent manner. Each unit addendum will have a \"Last Modification Date\" which represents the last\ndate the portion of the unit has been modified. The \"Modification Number\" represents Ecology's method for\ntracking the different versions of the permit. This log will serve as an up to date record of modifications and\nversion history of the unit.\nLast modification to PUREX June 30, 2012\nChapters Last Modification Date Modification Number\nConditions 06/30/2012\n1.0 Part A Form 10/01/2008\n2.0 Reserved\n3.0 Waste Analysis Plan 10/2006\n4.0 Process Information 10/2006\n5.0 Reserved\n6.0 Reserved\n7.0 Reserved\n8.0 Reserved\n9.0 Reserved\n10.0 Reserved\n11.0 Closure and Financial Assurance 10/2006\nAddenda Last Modification Date Modification Number\nA. Reserved\nB. Reserved\nC. Reserved\nD. Reserved\nE. Security 09/30/2010\nF. Preparedness and Prevention 09/30/2010\nG. Personnel Training 09/30/2012\nH. Reserved\n1. Inspection Requirements 09/30/2010\nJ. Contingency Plan (OUO) 09/30/2010\nChange Control Log PUREX 8C.2015.Q3\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nPART III, OPERATING UNIT 2 PERMIT CONDITIONS\nPUREX STORAGE TUNNELS\nConditions.1\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nConditions.2\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1 PART III, OPERATING UNIT 2 PERMIT CONDITIONS\n2 PUREX STORAGE TUNNELS\n3 UNIT DESCRIPTION\n4 The Plutonium Uranium Extraction Facility (PUREX) Storage Tunnels are mixed waste storage units\n5 consisting of two underground railroad tunnels: Tunnel Number 1, designated 218-E-14, and Tunnel\n6 Number 2, designated 218-E-15. This Chapter sets forth the operating Conditions for this treatment,\n7 storage, and disposal (TSD) unit.\n8 OPERATING UNIT 2\n9 Chapter 1.0 Part A Form, dated October 1, 2008\n10 Chapter 3.0 Waste Analysis Plan, dated October 2006\n11 Chapter 4.0 Process Information, dated October 2006\n12 Addendum E Security, dated September 30, 2010\n13 Addendum F Preparedness and Prevention, dated September 30, 2010\n14 Addendum G Personnel Training, dated June 30, 2012\n15 Addendum I Inspection Requirements, dated September 30, 2010\n16 Addendum J Contingency Plan, dated September 30, 2010\n17 Chapter 11.0 Closure and Financial Assurance, dated October 2006\n18\n19 III.2.A COMPLIANCE WITH UNIT SPECIFIC PERMIT CONDITIONS\n20 III.2.A.1 The Permittees will comply with all conditions in this Chapter and its addenda and\n21 chapters with respect to storage of waste in the miscellaneous units, (PUREX Storage\n22 Tunnels), in addition to applicable requirements in Permit Parts I and II.\n23 III.2.A.2 In the event that the Part III, Unit Specific Conditions for Operating Unit 2, PUREX\n24 Storage Tunnels conflict with the Part I, Standard Conditions and/or Part II, General\n25 Facility Conditions of the Permit, the unit specific conditions for Operating Unit 2,\n26 PUREX Storage Tunnels prevail.\n27 Ill.2.B UNIT SPECIFIC CONDITIONS\n28 Ill.2.B.1 Portions of Permit Attachment 4, Hanford Emergency Management Plan,\n29 (DOE/RL-94-02) that are not made enforceable by inclusion in the applicability matrix\n30 for that document are not made enforceable by reference in this document.\n31\nConditions.3\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nConditions.4\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nCHAPTER1\nPART A FORM\nChapter 1.1\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nChapter 1.2\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1\n2\nWA SHINGT N STATE\nD E P A R T 0 F Dangerous Waste Permit Application\nE C 0 L 0 G Y Part A Form\nDate Received Reviewec Jate: 0 9 2 2 2 0 0 8\nMonth Day Year Approvec Date: 0 9 2 2 2 0 0 8\n0 9 192008\n1. This form is submitted to: (place an \"X\" in the appropriate box)\nZ Request modification to a final status permit (commonly called a \"Part B\" permit)\nFl Request a change under interim status\nApply for a final status permit. This includes the application for the initial final status permit\nfor a site or for a permit renewal (i.e., a new permit to replace an expiring permit).\nF- Establish interim status because of the wastes newly (Date)regulated on:\nList waste codes:\nII. EPAIState ID Number\nWA 7890008967\nIll. Name of Facility\nUS Department of Energy -Hanford Facility\nIV. Facility Location (Physical address not P.O. Box or Route Number)\nA. Street\n825 Jadwin\nCity or Town State ZIP Code\nRichland WA 99352\nCoty County Name\n0 10 5 Benton\nB. C. Geographic Location D. Facility Existence Date\nLand Latitude (degrees, mins, Longitude (degrees, mins, Month Day YearType secs) secs)\nF Refer to TOPO Map (Section XV.) 0 3 0 2 1 9 4 3\nV. Facility Mailing Address\nStreet or P.O. Box\nP.O. Box 550\nCity or Town State ZIP Code\nRichland WA 99352\nChapter 1.3\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nVI. Facility contact (Person to be contacted regarding waste activities at facility)\nName (last) (first)\nBrockman David\nJob Title Phone Number (area code and number)\nManager (509) 376-7395\nContact Address\nStreet or P.O. Box\nP.O. Box 550\nCity or Town State ZIP Code\nRichland WA 99352\nVII. Facility Operator Information\nA. Name Phone Number\nDepartment of Energy * Owner/Operator (509) 376-7395\nCH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company Co-Operator for PUREX Storage Tunnels* (509) 376-0556*\nStreet or P.O. Box\nP.O. Box 550\nP.O. Box 1600 *\nCity or Town State ZIP Code-\nRichland WA 99352\nB. Operator Type F\nC. Does the name in VII.A reflec ta proposed change In operator? Yes No Co-Operator* change\nIf yes, provide the scheduled date for the change: Month D Year\n1 0 0 1 2 008\nD. Is the name listed in VII.A. also the owner? If yes, skip to Section VIII.C. L Yes No\nVIII. Facility Owner Information\nA. Name Phone Number (area code and number)\nDavid A. Brockman, Operator/Facility-Property Owner (509) 376-7395\nStreet or P.O. Box\nP.O. Box 550\nCity or Town State ZIP Code\nRichland WA 99352\nB. Owner Type F\nC. Does the name in VIII.A reflect a proposed change in owner? Yes No\nIf yes, provide the scheduled date for the change: Month Day Year\nIX. NAICS Codes (5/6 digit codes)\nA. First B. Second\n6 12 12 1 WasteTreatmentI& Disposal 9 2 4 1 1 0 Administration of Air & Water Resource &\nSolid Waste Management Programs\nC. Third D. Fourth\n54171 Research & Development in the\nPhysical, Engineering, & Life Sciences\nChapter 1.4\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nX. Other Environmental Permits (see instructions)\nA. Permit Type B. Permit Number C. Description\nE A I R 0 2 -1 2 2 1 WAC-246-247, NOC\nXI. Nature of Business (provide a brief description that includes both dangerous waste and non-dangerous\nwaste areas and activities)\nSectionXIV\n*The estimated annual quantity of waste listed represents the maximum quantity of waste placed in either\ntunnel in a given year.\nProcess Code X99 is being used to designate the PUREX Storage Tunnels as a Miscellaneous Unit per\nWAC 173-303-680. The PUREX Storage Tunnels, a miscellaneous unit (X99), are used for storage of mixed\nwaste subject to the requirements of WAC 173-303-680. The two tunnels store waste from the PUREX\nPlant and other onsite sources. Since being placed into service, mixed waste has been stored in the\ntunnels on railcars. Not all material stored in the tunnels contains mixed waste.\nThe construction of Tunnel Number 1 was completed in 1956. The tunnel is approximately 5.8 meters\n(19 feet) wide by 6.7 meters (22 feet) high by 109 meters (358 feet) long and provides storage space for\neight railcars. Between June 1960 and January 1965, all eight railcar positions were filled and the tunnel\nsubsequently was sealed. The combined volume of the equipment stored on the eight railcars presently in\nTunnel Number 1 is approximately 596 cubic meters (780 cubic yards). The maximum process design\ncapacity for storage in Tunnel Number 1 is approximately 4,129 cubic meters (5,400 cubic yards).\nThe construction of Tunnel Number 2 was completed in 1964. Tunnel Number 2 is approximately\n5.8 meters (19 feet) wide by 6.7 meters (22 feet) high by 514 meters (1,686 feet) long and provides storage\nspace for 40 railcars. The first railcar was placed in Tunnel Number 2 in December 1967 and as of\nAugust 2000, 28 railcars have been placed in the tunnel. The combined volume of equipment stored on\nthe 28 railcars presently in Tunnel Number 2 is approximately 2,204 cubic meters (2,883 cubic yards). The\nmaximum process design capacity for storage in Tunnel Number 2 is approximately 19,878 cubic meters\n(26,000 cubic yards).\nThe waste stored in the tunnels could include barium(D005), cadmium (D006), chromium (D007), lead\n(D008), mercury (D009), selenium (DO10), silver (3011), and light mineral oil (WTO2, state-only, toxic,\ndangerous waste) contained in oil absorption material. The silver is predominately in the form of salts\nand is considered ignitable (DO01) because of the presence of silver nitrate (AgNO 3). Cadmium also could\nbe considered state-only, toxic, dangerous waste (WTO2).\nChapter 1.5\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n2 EXAMPLE FOR COMPLETING ITEMS XII and XIII (shown in lines numbered X-1, X-2, and X-3 below): A facility has\n3 two storage tanks that hold 1200 gallons and 400 gallons respectively. There is also treatment in tanks at 20 gallons/hr.\n4 Finally, a one-quarter acre area that is two meters deep will undergo in situ vitrification.\n5\nSection XII. Process Codes and Design Section XIII. Other Process Codes\nCapacities\nB. Process Design B. Process Design\nCapa =lty C. A Capac:ity C.\nLine A- Process Process Li CapPcitysProcess 0 Process\nNumber Codes 2. Unit of Total Line Procems 2. Unit of Total DescriptionNu nter codberAout (enue ounit (enter code) 1. Amount Measure Numberte ofUnits (enter of Units\nIcode) code)\nX 1 S 0 2 1,600 G 002 X 1 T 0 4 700 C 001 In situ\nI I Ivitrification\nX 2 T 0 3 20 E 001\nX 3 T 0 4 700 C 001\nI X 9 9 24,007 C 002 1\n2 2\n3 3\n4 4\n5 5\n6 6\n7 7\n8 8\n9 9\n1 0 1 0\n1 1 1 1\n1 2 1 2\n1 3 1 3\n1 4 1 4\n1 5 1 5\n1 6 1 6\n1 7 1 7\n1 8 1 8\n1 9 1 9\n2 0 2 0\n2 1 2 1\n2 2 2 2\n2 3 2 3\n24 24\n25 25\nChapter 1.6\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nXIV. Description of Dangerous Wastes\nExample for completing this section: A facility will receive three non-listed wastes, then store and treat them on-site.\nTwo wastes are corrosive only, with the facility receiving and storing the wastes in containers. There will be about 200\npounds per year of each of these two wastes, which will be neutralized in a tank. The other waste is corrosive and\nignitable and will be neutralized then blended into hazardous waste fuel. There will be about 100 pounds per year of that\nwaste, which will be received in bulk and put into tanks.\nA. Dangeros B. Estimated C. Unit of D. Processes\nLine A.WanerNous Annual Measure(2PrcsDerito\nNumber a o Quantity of (enter (1) Process Codes (enter) [I ac Pro DsrptDon(enter code) Waste coe facode Is not entered In D (1)]\nX1 D 0 0 2 400 P S01T 01\nX2 D 0 0 1 100 P SO2TO1\nX 3 D 0 0 2 Included with above\n1 D 0 0 5 454* K X 9 9 Includes Debris\n2 D 0 0 6 454* K X 9 9 Includes Debris\n3 W T 0 2 K X 9 9 Includes Debris\n4 D 0 0 7 454* K X 9 9 Includes Debris\n5 D 0 0 8 8,000* K X 9 9 Includes Debris\n6 D 0 0 9 45* K X 9 9 Includes Debris\n7 D 0 1 0 454* K X 9 9 Includes Debris\n8 D 0 1 1 680* K X 9 9 Includes Debris\n9 D 0 0 1 K X 9 9 Includes Debris\n1 0 W T 0 2 454 K X 9 9 Includes Debris\n11\n12\n13\n1 4\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23\n24\n25\nChapter 1.7\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nXV. Map\nAttach to this application a topographic map of the area extending to at least one (1) mile beyond property boundaries. The\nmap must show the outline of the facility; the location of each of its existing and proposed intake and discharge structures;\neach of its dangerous waste treatment, storage, recycling, or disposal units; and each well where fluids are injected\nunderground. Include all springs, rivers, and other surface water bodies in this map area, plus drinking water wells listed in\npublic records or otherwise known to the applicant within 1/4mile of the facility property boundary. The instructions provide\nadditional information on meeting these requirements.\nTopographic map is located in the Ecology Library\nXVI. Facility Drawing\nAll existing facilities must include a scale drawing of the facility (refer to Instructions for more detail).\nXVII. Photographs\nAll existing facilities must include photographs (aerial or ground-level) that clearly delineate all existing structures; existing\nstorage, treatment, recycling, and disposal areas; and sites of future storage, treatment, recycling, or disposal areas (refer to\nInstructions for more detail).\nXVIII. Certifications\nI certify under penalty of law that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or\nsupervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and\nevaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or\nthose persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the information submitted is, to the best of my\nknowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for\nsubmitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.\nOperator Signature Date Signed\nName and Official Title (type or print)\nDavid A. Brockman, Manager\nU.S. Department of Energy\nRichland Operations Office\nCo-Operator* Signature Date Signed\nName and Official Title (type or print)\nJohn G. Lehew, III\nPresident and Chief Executive Officer\nCH2M HILL Plateau Remediation Company\nCo-Operator -Address and Telephone Number*\nP.O. Box 1600\nRichland, WA 99352\n(509) 376-0556\nFacility-Property Owner Sig ure Date Signed\nName and Official Title (type or print)\nDavid A. Brockman, Manager\nU.S. Department of Energy f(\nRichland Operations Office\nChapter 1.8\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nComments\nIn Section VII. Facility Operator Information, there is no change to DOE as the Facility Owner/Operator; only a change\nin Co-Operator*. The change in Co-Operator* will be effective October 1, 2008.\nChapter 1.9\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nPUREX Tunnel No. 1 -Details\n2\n3\nBumper\nears Tunnel No. 1 a haft\nRailroad Tracks\n10f 350 ft -B\nPUREX Tunnel No.1 -Plan View\n*-20ftTypical-* 2\naft Minimum1/90% Mineral Surface Roofing (Typical) X1I\n41In. X121In.\nConcrete 19ft\nWall Posts and\nTimbers\n12 In. X 14 In.\nCreosoted Backfill\nDouglas Fir\n3 ft 'ipleal)\nSectio AA Sand and Section BB\nGravel Floor\nPUREX Tunnel No.1 -Section View\nVent\nWater- Fillabie Doors Grade 1% Position 1 Shaft\n/, ,Bumper\n350 ftft\nPUREX Tunnel No.1 -Elevation View\nFor conversion to meters, multiply feet by 0.3048.\nFor conversion to centimeters, multiply inches by 2.54.\nH96030106.2\nChapter 1.10\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nPUREX Tunnel No. 2 -Details\n2\nFor Future Tunnel S0rage Ar Vent ShaftWater-itable DoerPUREXTunnetNo.2 A\nWater.Fitable Door\n,,g:PURtEX Tunnel No. 1 -==)-Vnt ShaftA\nStorage Arm\nPUREX Tunnels .Plan View\n2\nmft\nBi1tumninous Coated Steel Uner\nAeinforced\nConcrete Beam g Sackfll\nf22 ft .t\n-17 ft * 3 In. Radia\nRailread.\nTrackI\n' s taSection AA\nTunnet No. 2\nSand and Gravel Floor 4 ft -G6in. 4Nft* 8in\nWatr-Fltable Grade 0.1% Poeltion I Vent\nooor Sharn\nPUREX Tunnel No. 2- Elevation View\n7e910032.1\nChapter 1.11\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1 PUREX Storage Tunnels\n2\n3\n4\n5\n6\n7\n8\n9\n10\n11\n12\n13\n14\n15\n16\n17\n18\n19\n20\n21\n22\n23 Vent Shaft\n24 89100252-3CN Photo Taken 198925\n26\n27\n28\nSample Gallery Pip. and Aqueous Makeup\nOperating Service Blo .r\nControl R\nRoom Crne Cab\nSlay Crane\nHot Cab Crane\nPipe Crae\nTrenc h hiMaintenance\nAir Tunnel\nN Cell Process Cells\nAir Tunnel\nWater Spray\nConcrete Call\nCovers Typical Cell\nConfiguration\nDissolver Cel\nHot Pipe Cask Car\nTrench R.R. Tunnel\nChapter 1. 12\n 1 20-A SorapAr..O ant 2\n203- UNHPempHouel~otrolRoomit(Pf-t.\n7 2t Fain M W\nSwer 42h1A S d Cel rS m l Pi $3M 27\n11 24-t Storage Tuno 14- -e2A 22 20-A UNH Poprap nedorol roo\nl A FracTE nim a torBldg B gM iognG lO O\n1. 27 tAUEX aintenance~ 0.adl BOCo 211-A 5taginralgze BA\nS. 212-A L OE a Generatom 41\n7.23AReg. Mait. Workshtop}\n19 21-A Exas an 3120 214-A. SC, 0 4 Boa21-AC S hpd Collor Sutpl Pit\n10. 216-AS POO0 Pit ont I\n111. 21$-E-14 Storage Tunnel 1-\n12. 21-A1 Stoniage TGnnel\n123. 22-AC TEO Moniter g Bldg Main Ga4g\n14 El1Acal Switch (stlotI\n1i. 271.AB PU5162 Meinmanac it Isc Exclusion\n1s' MD-409 Al. Zonte\n17. 276-AR Coll Offgang Area\ni6 261-A J.\"eny 43. r.k..a A-t .06- 21st-A S42\n19. 291-A EAhant FEnlosu U elon\n20. 291-AA Sale Shak le [ Ban\n21. 291-AC Ma,. Shack 81dgNd\n220 29-AD Disoner 0tt Ga BIlg C2r\n2n. 291-AE 1d Fillr Bld\n24 291-AC Ols st. Shack\n22. 291-AH A(mmonia Off s Smplr Bldg 7\n23 291-AJ St. Shackondnnle\n34. 295-AS P00 (Prooe Dietitiate) 0j Ttto27. 2912AkAir TrinalEnclosure U- 29\n23. 2952-AAPR Stack Sample ol 32. 29-AB Main Slack ldg Bldg XB 2701 Dseer 0 B ld ge 202A 31. 294-A O Gao Gatr, Shack 32. 29-A AS b (Amionia Scruhbbr)23. 271-AA CD(SteampCoridgaI) 1 3\n32. 27-AC Cl Sample Bldg hous 20. 29-AID CWI. (Colafg Wet\") ~ I N 349 TI 23 U\n37. 295-AE New PDO Montorinng Bldg ISBuia\n20. 2701-AB Badg ue lin9eTnne\n29. 2701 -AC Patrol Gruard Shack 00 1KJ\n40, EloatricalSubtationo 33\n41. VII-A-IlAlrCampreuir Bldg 000 2 tck4\n42. 2712-A Panphioune6(91A1Bra\n43. 2714-A Chemical WarehosEe0\n44. 2901-A Water Tank\n45. BT) Enharuater Are49. L.atry Sample Reneiving Dockt\n47, PA-Cock\n41. Railroad Storage Shad 1\n4ft SAMO-- Unitit\n61. U0406\n52. M0-347\n6 .M0-246 \n910.-- Stoe-go ShackaExclusion C\nK -KaDivers onr\n4Ara 2G97020257.1Burial\n#22\n0>\n(' -1]\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n- 9-E26E\n299-E225\n299 E2 21E4\nSections So_-* PUREX. 2neC 25I\n29 ,299E71, I 9E61\nShctided Sptionionecion\ndenote areas that ~[~\nare within the\nTSD boundary. I\nP UREX HnodSt O prtn ra\nPrepared for *IjcinadWtdaa el ao od\nUS DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY\nRICHLAND OPERATIONS OFFICE---DersinCtos--Ralad\nCreated and Published by:\nCentral Mapping Services JSWsanKowReaes-Fcs\nFluor Hanford, Richland, WAUft-LierSMsadKonRlss\n(509) 373-9076Loain stSM5adKwnRlse\nIntended Use: REFERENCE ONLY\nTopographic Data:Merset1996 BectelHanfrdln~0H1nfo0rd0 Faclit 0Concrete0 20-1\\ --D prssin9ontur2Ralrad\nO:kProjects200RCRA TSio,50614_2ndPrioityFaciliyTopos2005_Thompson.MapsO80 723_PUREX _Linewg_85x11_Rev1mxd -85/2008 @ 2:50:03 PMl\nChapter 1.14\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nCHAPTER 3.0\nWASTE ANALYSIS PLAN\nChapter 3.i\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\n6\nChapter 3.ii\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1\n2 CHAPTER 3.0\n3 WASTE ANALYSIS PLAN\n4\n5\n6 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n7 3.0 WASTE ANALYSIS PLAN................................. ................ 7\n8 3.1 Chemical, Biological, and Physical Analyses ........................ .......... 7\n9 3.2 Tracking System.....................................................7\n10 3.3 Facility Description ................................................... 8\n11 3.3.1 Process and Activities ................................................. 9\n12 3.3.2 Physical Characterization of Material to be Stored.............................. 10\n13 3.4 Identification/Classification and Quantities Of Dangerous Waste Managed Within\n14 The PUREX Storage Tunnels............................................. 10\n15 3.5 Waste Analysis Parameters ............................................... 10\n16 3.5.1 Waste Identification .................................................. 10\n17 3.5.2 Parameter and Rationale Selection Process ..................... ................ 14\n18 3.5.3 Rationale for Parameter Selection ................................. .......... 15\n19 3.5.4 Special Parameter Selection ..................... ................. 15\n20 3.5.5 Selection of Sampling Procedures............... .................... ..... 15\n21 3.5.6 Sampling Strategies........................................................ 15\n22 3.5.7 Selection of Sampling Equipment ......................................... 16\n23 3.5.8 Maintaining and Decontaminating Field Equipment ........................ ..... 16\n24 3.5.9 Sample Preservation and Storage.............. .......................... 17\n25 3.5.10 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Procedures. ............................. 17\n26 3.5.11 Health and Safety Protocols .................................................. 17\n27 3.6 Laboratory Selection and Testing and Analytical Methods ........................ 17\n28 3.6.1 Laboratory Selection ............................................ ...... 17\n29 3.6.2 Testing and Analytical Methods................................................. 17\n30 3.7 Waste Re-Evaluation Frequencies ........................................... 18\n31 3.8 Special Procedural Requirements......................................... 18\n32 3.8.1 Procedures for Receiving Wastes Generated Offsite ...................................... 18\n33 3.8.2 Procedures for Ignitable, Reactive, and Incompatible Waste....................... 18\n34 3.8.3 Provisions for Complying with Land Disposal Restriction Requirements....... .............. 18\n35 3.8.4 Deviations from the Requirements of this Plan ................ .................. 18\n36 3.9 Recordkeeping......................................................................... 18\n37 3.10 References ........................................................ 18\nChapter 3.iii\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1 TABLE\n2 Table 3.1. PUREX Storage Tunnels Inventory ..................................... ..... 19\n3\nChapter 3.iv\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1 GLOSSARY\n2 ALARA as low as reasonably achievable\n3 ECOLOGY Washington State Department of Ecology\n4 EHW extremely hazardous waste\n5 EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency\n6 pH negative logarithm of the hydrogen-ion concentration\n7 PUREX plutonium-uranium extraction\n8 QA/QC quality assurance and quality control\n9 TSD treatment, storage, and/or disposal\n10 WAC Washington Administrative Code\n11 WAP waste analysis plan\n12\nChapter 3.v\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nMETRIC CONVERSION CHART\n2 The following conversion chart provides the reader an aid in conversion.\n3\nInto metric units Out of metric units\nIf you know Multiply by To get If you know Multiply by To get\nLength Length\ninches 25.40 millimeters millimeters 0.0393 inches\ninches 2.54 centimeters centimeters 0.393 inches\nfeet 0.3048 meters meters 3.2808 feet\nyards 0.914 meters meters 1.09 yards\nmiles 1.609 kilometers kilometers 0.62 miles\nArea Area\nsquare inches 6.4516 square square 0.155 square inches\ncentimeters centimeters\nsquare feet 0.092 square meters square meters 10.7639 square feet\nsquare yards 0.836 square meters square meters 1.20 square yards\nsquare miles 2.59 square square 0.39 square miles\nI kilometers kilometers\nacres 0.404 hectares hectares 2.471 acres\nMass (weight) Mass (weight)\nounces 28.35 grams grams 0.0352 ounces\npounds L 0.45 3 kilograms kilograms 2.2046 pounds\nshort ton 0.907 metric ton metric ton 1.10 short ton\nVolume Volume\nfluid ounces 29.57 milliliters milliliters 0.03 fluid ounces\nquarts 0.95 liters liters 1.057 quarts\ngallons 3.79 liters liters 0.26 gallons\ncubic feet 0.03 cubic meters cubic meters 35.3147 cubic feet\ncubic yards 0.76456 cubic meters cubic meters 1.308 cubic yards\nTemperature Temperature\nFahrenheit subtract 32 Celsius Celsius multiply by Fahrenheit\nthen multiply 9/5ths, then\nby 5/9ths _ _ add 32\n4 Source: Engineering Unit Conversions, M. R. Lindeburg, PE, Second Ed., 1990, Professional\n5 Publications, Inc., Belmont, California.\nChapter 3.vi\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1 3.0 WASTE ANALYSIS PLAN\n2 This chapter provides information on the chemical, biological, and physical characteristics of the\n3 dangerous waste stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels. Waste in the tunnels is stored and managed as\n4 mixed waste. The PUREX Storage Tunnels provide the necessary shielding for the protection of\n5 employees and the environment from mixed waste.\n6 3.1 Chemical, Biological, and Physical Analyses\n7 Regulated material presently stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels contains the following dangerous\n8 waste:\n9 * Lead\n10 * Mercury\n11 * Silver and silver salts\n12 * Chromium\n13 * Cadmium\n14 * Barium\n15 * Mineral oil\n16 In general, dangerous waste is either attached to, contained within, or actually is material removed from\n17 the PUREX Plant and other onsite sources. Changes in dangerous waste stored is updated annually in the\n18 annual dangerous waste report submitted to Ecology. Future storage of barium and selenium may occur\n19 in Tunnel Number 2. The PUREX Storage Tunnels are permitted as a miscellaneous unit under\n20 WAC 173-303-680 because the tunnels are not a typical containerized storage unit. That is, the bulk of\n21 the material stored in the tunnels is not placed in a container; rather, this material is placed on a portable\n22 device (railcar) used as a storage platform. The mixed waste stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels is\n23 encased or contained within carbon or stainless steel plate, pipe, or vessels that meet the\n24 WAC 173-303-040 definition of container. Therefore, the mixed waste normally is not exposed to the\n25 tunnel environment.\n26 The only free-liquid dangerous waste stored in the tunnels is elemental mercury. The mercury is\n27 contained within thick-walled (0.8-centimeter) thermowells. The amount of mercury per thermowell is\n28 less than 1.7 liters.\n29 Other liquid containers, such as large discarded process tanks, are stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels.\n30 These containers are 'empty' [per WAC 173-303-160(2)(a)]. In the future, containers will be flushed and\n31 the final rinsate sampled and analyzed to verify that the residual heel is not a dangerous waste.\n32 The only stored mixed waste that is designated as either reactive or ignitable (DOO1) is silver nitrate in the\n33 silver reactors [WAC 173-303-090(5)]. There is no mixed waste designated as reactive (1003). The\n34 potential for ignition from this source is considered negligible because this material is dispersed on\n35 ceramic packing and is physically isolated from contact with any combustible material or ignition source.\n36 3.2 Tracking System\n37 Specific waste tracking forms for the movement of waste destined for the PUREX Storage Tunnels are\n38 used. These waste tracking forms effectively track waste inventories from generation through storage.\n39 The waste tracking forms and other supporting documentation will be maintained at the Hanford Facility\n40 for a minimum of 5 years following closure of the PUREX Storage Tunnels.\nChapter 3.7\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1 3.3 Facility Description\n2 This waste analysis plan (WAP) has been prepared for the PUREX Storage Tunnels, located on the\n3 Hanford Facility, Richland, Washington. This WAP applies to all mixed waste (containing dangerous\n4 components) regulated by WAC 173-303 that is transferred to and/or contained in the PUREX Storage\n5 Tunnels.\n6 The PUREX Storage Tunnels are permitted as a miscellaneous unit under WAC 173-303-680. The bulk\n7 of the waste stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels is not placed in a typical container; rather, this waste is\n8 placed on a portable device (railcar) that is used as a storage platform. In general, the mixed waste stored\n9 in the PUREX Storage Tunnels is encased or contained within carbon or stainless steel plate, pipe, or\n10 vessels. Therefore, the mixed waste normally is not exposed to the tunnel environment.\n11 The PUREX Facility, located in the 200 East Area, consists of two separate treatment, storage, and/or\n12 disposal (TSD) units, the PUREX Plant (202-A Building) and the PUREX Storage Tunnels. Access to\n13 the PUREX Storage Tunnels is by means of the railroad tunnel.\n14 The PUREX Storage Tunnels branch off from the railroad tunnel and extend southward from the east end\n15 of the PUREX Plant. The tunnels are used for storage of mixed waste from the PUREX Plant and from\n16 other onsite sources. Each storage tunnel is isolated from the railroad tunnel by a water-fillable shielding\n17 door. There are no electrical utilities, water lines, drains, fire detection or suppression systems, or\n18 communication systems provided inside the PUREX Storage Tunnels.\n19 Material selected for storage is loaded on railcars modified to serve as both transport and storage\n20 platforms. Normally, a remote-controlled, battery-powered locomotive was used to position the railcar in\n21 the storage tunnel. In the past and possibly in the future, other remote movers, e.g., standard locomotive\n22 with a string of railcar spacers, power winch, etc., have or could be used to position a railcar in the tunnel\n23 or to withdraw a car from the tunnel. The railcar storage positions are numbered sequentially,\n24 commencing with Position I that abuts the rail stop bumper at the south end of each tunnel. Position 2 is\n25 the location of the railcar that abuts the railcar in Position I and so forth. The railcars and material remain\n26 in the storage tunnel until final disposition is determined. Each railcar is retrievable; however, because\n27 the railcars are stored on a single, dead-end railroad track, the railcars can be removed only in reverse\n28 order (i.e., last in, first out).\n29 Construction of Tunnel Number I was completed in 1956. The Tunnel has three areas, the water-fillable\n30 door, the storage area, and the vent shaft. The water-fillable door is located at the north end of Tunnel\n31 Number I and separates the storage tunnel from the railroad tunnel. The door is 7.5 meters high,\n32 6.6 meters wide, and 2.1 meters thick, and is constructed of 1.3-centimeter steel plate. The door is hollow\n33 so that the door can be filled with water to act as a shield when the door is in the down (closed) position.\n34 If the door is filled with water, the water must be pumped from the door before the door can be raised.\n35 Above the door is a reinforced concrete structure in which the door is raised to open the tunnel. Electric\n36 hoists used for opening and closing the door are located on the top of this concrete structure.\n37 The storage area is that portion of the tunnel that extends southward from the water-fillable door. Inside\n38 dimensions of Tunnel Number I are 109.1 meters long, 6.7 meters high, and 5.9 meters wide. Ceiling\n39 and walls are 35.6-centimeters thick and constructed of 30.5- by 35.6-centimeter creosote pressure-treated\n40 Douglas fir timbers arranged side by side. The first 30.5 meters of the east wall are constructed of\n41 0.9-meter-thick reinforced concrete. A 40.8-kilogram mineral-surface roofing material was used to cover\n42 the exterior surface of the timbers before placement of 2.4 meters of earth fill. The earth cover serves as\n43 protection from the elements and as shielding. The timbers that form the walls rest on reinforced concrete\n44 footings 0.9 meter wide by 0.3 meter thick. The floor consists of a railroad track laid on a gravel bed.\n45 The space between the ties is filled to top-of-tie with gravel ballast. The tracks are on a 1.0 percent\n46 downward slope to the south to ensure that the railcars remain in their storage position. A railcar bumper\n47 is located 2.4 meters from the south end of the tracks to act as a stop. The capacity of the storage area is\n48 eight, 12.8-meter-long railcars.\nChapter 3.8\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nI In June 1960, the first two railcars were loaded with a single, approximately 12.5-meter-long, failed\n2 separation column and placed in Tunnel Number 1. Between June 1960 and January 1965, six more\n3 railcars were placed in Tunnel Number 1, filling the tunnel. After the last car was placed in the\n4 northern-most storage position (Position 8), the water-fillable door was closed, filled with water, and\n5 deactivated electrically.\n6 Construction of Tunnel Number 2 was started and completed in 1964. Like Tunnel Number 1, Tunnel\n7 Number 2 consists of three functional areas: the water-fillable door, the storage area, and the vent shaft.\n8 Construction of Tunnel Number 2 differs from that of Tunnel Number I as follows.\n9 * A combination of steel and reinforced concrete was used in the construction of the storage area\n10 for Tunnel Number 2 rather than wood timbers, as used in Tunnel Number 1.\n11 * Tunnel Number 2 is longer, having a storage capacity of five times that of Tunnel Number 1.\n12 * The floor of Tunnel Number 2, outboard of the railroad ties, slopes upward to a height of\n13 approximately 1.8 meters above the railroad bed, whereas the floor in Tunnel Number 1 remains\n14 flat all the way out to the sidewalls.\n15 * The railroad tunnel approach to Tunnel Number 2 angles eastward then angles southward to\n16 parallel Tunnel Number 1. The approach to Tunnel Number I is a straight extension southward\n17 from the PUREX Plant. Center-line to center-line distance between the two tunnels is\n18 approximately 18.3 meters.\n19 The physical structure of the water-fillable door at the north end of Tunnel Number 2 essentially is\n20 identical to the water-fillable door for Tunnel Number 1. The water-fillable door for Tunnel Number 2 is\n21 approximately 57.9 meters south and 18.3 meters east of the water-fillable door for Tunnel Number 1. As\n22 of March 1997, the door is empty and there is no plan to fill the door.\n23 The storage area of Tunnel Number 2 is that portion of the tunnel extending southward from the\n24 water-fillable door. Construction of this portion of Tunnel Number 2 consists of a 10.4-meter diameter,\n25 steel (0.5 centimeter plate), and semicircular-shaped roof, supported by internal I-beam wales attached to\n26 external, reinforced concrete arches. The concrete arches are 0.4 meter thick and vary in width from\n27 0.4 to 1.8 meters. The arches are spaced on 4.8-meter centers. This semicircular structure is supported on\n28 reinforced concrete grade beams approximately 1.8 meters wide by 1.2 meters thick (one on each side)\n29 that run the full length of Tunnel Number 2. The interior and exterior surfaces of the steel roof are coated\n30 with a bituminous coating compound to inhibit corrosion. The entire storage area is covered with\n31 2.4 meters of earth fill to serve as shielding.\n32 The nominal inside dimensions of Tunnel Number 2 are 514.5 meters long, 7.9 meters high, and\n33 10.4 meters wide. However, because of the arch-shaped cross-section of Tunnel Number 2 and entry\n34 clearance at the water-fillable door, the usable storage area (width and height above top-of-rail) is\n35 6.7 meters high and 5.8 meters wide, the same dimensions as for Tunnel Number 1. The floor consists of\n36 a railroad track laid on a gravel bed. The space between ties is filled to top-of-tie with gravel ballast.\n37 Commencing at the ends of the 2.4-meter-long ties, the earth floor is sloped upward on a I (vertical) to\n38 1 1/2 (horizontal) grade. The tracks are on a 1/10 of 1 percent downgrade slope to the south to ensure the\n39 railcars remain in their storage position. A railcar bumper is located 2.4 meters from the south end of the\n40 tracks to act as a stop. The capacity of the storage area is 40, 12.8-meter-long railcars.\n41 The first railcar was placed in storage in December 1967. Table 3.1 contains an approximate inventory of\n42 waste stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels.\n43 3.3.1 Process and Activities\n44 The function of the PUREX Tunnels is to store mixed waste until the waste can be processed for final\n45 disposal. When waste is to be placed in the storage tunnels, a work plan, describing the overall transfer\n46 activities, and a storage tunnel checklist are prepared. The work plan and storage tunnel checklist are\n47 routed for review and concurrence by key personnel and forwarded to management for approval.\nChapter 3.9\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1 3.3.2 Physical Characterization of Material to be Stored\n2 Physical characterization of waste includes an evaluation of the following physical properties:\n3 * Length, width, and height\n4 * Gross weight and volume\n5 * Preferred orientation for transport and storage\n6 * Presence of dangerous waste constituents\n7 Information sources used in physical characterization include equipment fabrication and installation\n8 drawings, operational records, and process knowledge. Physical characterization provides information\n9 necessary to describe the waste material. Such information also is used to design and fabricate, if\n10 required, supports on the railcar.\n11 Before removal from service, the equipment could be flushed to minimize loss of products, to reduce\n12 contamination, and to reduce dangerous waste constituents present in a residual heel to nonregulated\n13 levels. When equipment is flushed, analysis of the rinsate is used to determine when these goals have\n14 been achieved.\n15 3.4 Identification/Classification and Quantities Of Dangerous Waste Managed Within\n16 The PUREX Storage Tunnels\n17 Table 3.1 contains an approximation of the total amount of waste stored within the PUREX Storage\n18 Tunnels.\n19 3.5 Waste Analysis Parameters\n20 Analytical requirements were selected based on knowledge required for the safe handling and storage of\n21 the waste within the PUREX Storage Tunnels, including any operational compliance issues.\n22 3.5.1 Waste Identification\n23 A prerequisite step in proper waste management is to address whether waste being considered for\n24 management within the PUREX Storage Tunnels falls within the scope of this unit's permit. This\n25 includes identifying any dangerous waste in accordance with regulatory and permit requirements and\n26 applicability of any land disposal restrictions.\n27 This section provides information on how the chemical and physical characteristics of the mixed waste\n28 currently stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels were determined so that the waste is stored and managed\n29 properly.\n30 Regulated material presently stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels contains the following dangerous\n31 waste:\n32 * Lead\n33 * Mercury\n34 * Silver and silver salts\n35 * Chromium\n36 * Cadmium\n37 * Barium\n38 * Mineral oil\nChapter 3.10\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1 Storage of non-PUREX Plant waste is reviewed on a case-by-case basis. Sampling, chemical analysis,\n2 process knowledge (as discussed in the following section), and/or inventory information from waste\n3 tracking forms provided from other onsite sources are required to confirm the characteristics and\n4 quantities of mixed waste to be stored. Future waste and dangerous constituents might not be in the same\n5 configuration or form as described in the following sections.\n6 3.5.1.1 Lead\n7 Lead stored was used in various capacities during past Hanford Facility operations. Primary functions of\n8 lead included use as weights, counterweights, and shielding. Often the lead is encased in steel (carbon or\n9 stainless) to facilitate its attachment to various types of equipment.\n10 Lead exhibits the characteristic of toxicity as determined by the toxicity characteristics leaching\n11 procedure and is designated D008 [WAC 173-303-090(8)]. The quantity of lead present could produce an\n12 extract greater than 500 milligrams per liter should the lead be exposed to a leachate. However, because\n13 the bulk of the lead is encased in steel, is stored inside a weather-tight structure, and is elevated above\n14 floor level on railcars that isolate the lead from other materials stored, the potential for exposure of bare\n15 lead to a leachate is considered negligible.\n16 Sampling and chemical analysis is not performed on lead associated with the material placed in the\n17 PUREX Storage Tunnels. Therefore, the accuracy of the estimate on the amount of lead presently stored\n18 in each tunnel is limited to the data available from process knowledge. Counterweights on equipment\n19 dunnage and lead used for shielding cannot be quantified by existing historical records and are not\n20 included for lead listed on Table 3.1. However, if removed from the tunnels, the material will be\n21 examined and any suspect attachments will be removed, evaluated, and disposed of in accordance with\n22 established methods.\n23 3.5.1.2 Mercury\n24 Mercury is contained within thermowells that are an integral part of spent reactor fuel dissolvers used at\n25 the PUREX Plant. The dissolvers are large 304L stainless steel process vessels that are approximately\n26 2.7 meters in diameter, 7.3 meters tall, and weigh approximately 26,309 kilograms. The outer shell is\n27 constructed of a 1-centimeter-thick plate. The dissolvers were used in decladding and dissolving spent\n28 reactor fuel in the PUREX Plant.\n29 Depending on the specific dissolver in question, 19.1 or 45.4 kilograms of mercury (1.4 or 1.77 liters)\n30 were poured in each of the two thermowells per dissolver (38.2 or 90.8 kilograms total per dissolver)\n31 following vertical installation of the dissolvers inside the PUREX canyon and before the dissolver was\n32 installed in a process cell. The mercury served to transfer heat from the dissolver interior to the\n33 thermohm temperature sensor mounted within the thermowell. This mercury remains within the\n34 thermowells of discarded dissolvers. In preparation for storage, the thermohms were removed and the\n35 upper end of each thermowell was plugged with a 304L stainless steel nozzle plug. In storage, the\n36 discarded dissolver rests in an inclined position in a cradle on the railcar. The mercury contained in the\n37 thermowells remains in the lower portion of each thermowell and, under normal conditions, is never in\n38 contact with the mechanical closure on the nozzle end of the thermowell.\n39 Mercury exhibits the characteristic of toxicity as determined by the toxicity characteristics leaching\n40 procedure and is designated D009 [WAC 173-303-090(8)].\n41 The potential for mercury to become exposed to leachate is considered negligible. The PUREX Storage\n42 Tunnels are designed and constructed as weather-tight structures. Further, the mercury is encased in a\n43 stainless steel pipe within a stainless steel vessel that is stored on a railcar above the floor level of the\n44 tunnels. Therefore, exposure of the mercury stored in the tunnels to leachate is not considered a credible\n45 occurrence.\nChapter 3.11\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nI Sampling and chemical analysis is not performed on mercury associated with the dissolvers stored in\n2 Tunnel Number 2. The quantity of mercury present in each thermowell is documented on Table 3.1.\n3 3.5.1.3 Silver\n4 Silver, mostly in the form of silver salts deposited on unglazed ceramic packing, is contained within the\n5 discarded silver reactors stored in Tunnel Number 2. The silver reactors were used to remove iodine from\n6 the offgas streams of the spent reactor fuel dissolvers. The reactor vessel is approximately 1.4 meters in\n7 diameter by 4.1 meters tall and is constructed of 1-centimeter 304L stainless steel. The vessel contains\n8 two 1.2-meter-deep beds of packing. Each bed consists of a 30.5-centimeter depth of 2.5-centimeter\n9 unglazed ceramic saddles topped with a 0.6-meter depth of 1.3-centimeter unglazed ceramic saddles. The\n10 two beds are separated vertically by a distance of about 0.6 meter, and each bed rests on a support made\n11 of stainless steel angles and coarse screen. The packing was coated initially with 113.4 kilograms of\n12 silver nitrate used for iodine retention. Nozzles on the top of the reactor were provided to allow flushing\n13 and/or regeneration of the packing with silver nitrate solution as the need arose.\n14 Because of competing reactions, which include conversion of silver nitrate to silver iodide, reduction of\n15 silver nitrate to metallic silver, and formation of silver chloride, the packing of a stored silver reactor\n16 contains a mixture of silver nitrate, silver halides, and silver fines.\n17 Silver salts exhibit the characteristics of toxicity as determined by the toxicity characteristics leaching\n18 procedure and are designated DOI 1 [WAC 173-303-090(8)]. Silver salts exhibit the characteristic of\n19 ignitability and are designated as DOOI [WAC 173-303-090(5)].\n20 The potential of silver, including silver salts, stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels to become exposed to\n21 leachate is considered negligible. Silver is contained within a stainless steel vessel, stored inside a\n22 weather-tight structure, and elevated above floor level on a railcar. Therefore, exposure of the silver\n23 stored in the tunnels to leachate is not considered a credible occurrence. In addition, the contained silver\n24 is isolated from contact with any combustibles; therefore, the possibility of ignition is considered\n25 extremely remote.\n26 Provisions for taking samples of the packing were not provided in the design of the vessels. Therefore,\n27 sampling and chemical analysis are not performed for silver salts before placing a silver reactor in\n28 storage. However, for accountability, the total silver content (Table 3.1) is considered silver nitrate, the\n29 salt that exhibits the characteristics of both ignitability and toxicity.\n30 The quantity of silver salts contained within a discarded silver reactor is a function of silver nitrate\n31 regeneration history. Operating records (process knowledge) of regenerations and flushes are used to\n32 estimate the total accumulation of silver within each reactor.\n33 3.5.1.4 Chromium\n34 Presently, chromium stored in Tunnel Number 2 is contained within a failed concentrator removed from\n35 the PUREX Plant, and within stainless steel containers received from the 324 Building. The concentrator\n36 is a vertical tube structure that was used to concentrate aqueous streams from the final uranium cycle,\n37 final plutonium cycles, final neptunium cycles, and condensate from the acid recovery system for recycle.\n38 Following service, the concentrator was inspected and found to contain silicate solids with high levels of\n39 chromium from the corrosion of stainless steel. The existence of chromium within the 324 Building\n40 waste was determined through process knowledge. Chromium exhibits the characteristic of toxicity as\n41 determined by the toxicity characteristics leaching procedure and is designated D007\n42 [WAC 173-303-090(8)]. The potential for the chromium stored in Tunnel Number 2 to become exposed\n43 to leachate is considered negligible. Tunnel Number 2, is designed and constructed to be weather-tight.\n44 Further, the chromium is encased within stainless steel vessels and containers that are stored on railcars\n45 above the floor level of the tunnel. Therefore, exposure of the chromium stored in the tunnel to leachate\n46 is not considered a credible occurrence.\nChapter 3.12\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1 The quantity of chromium within the concentrator was estimated by calculating the volume of silicate\n2 solids and the percentage of chromium within the silicate solids. The quantity of chromium in the\n3 324 Building waste was based on process knowledge.\n4 3.5.1.5 Cadmium\n5 Presently, cadmium stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnel Number 2 is associated with shielding and with\n6 a dissolver moderator removed from the PUREX Plant, and within stainless steel containers received\n7 from the 324 Building. The cadmium was used to shield equipment and consists of sheets of the metal\n8 attached to lead, both of which could be encased in steel. The cadmium received from the 324 Building\n9 was used in waste technology research and development programs.\n10 The dissolvers are annular vessels that are geometrically favorable for criticality safety. The dissolvers\n11 were placed over cadmium lined (neutron absorbers) moderators for additional criticality safety. The\n12 moderator is a centrally located, cylindrical, cadmium-jacketed 0.08-centimeter-thick concrete\n13 15.2-centimeter-thick neutron absorber. The moderators are approximately 4.4 meters tall by\n14 approximately 1.5 meters outer diameter.\n15 Cadmium exhibits the characteristic of toxicity as determined by the toxicity characteristics leaching\n16 procedure and is designated D006 [WAC 173-303-090(8)]. If exposed to a leachate, the quantity of\n17 cadmium present could produce an extract having a concentration of greater than or equal to 1 milligram\n18 per liter, but less than 100 milligrams per liter; therefore, the mixed waste is managed as a WTO2\n19 [WAC 173-303-100(5)].\n20 The potential for the cadmium stored in Tunnel Number 2 to become exposed to leachate is considered\n21 negligible. Tunnel Number 2 is designed and constructed to be weather-tight. Further, the cadmium is\n22 stored on railcars above the floor level of the tunnel. Therefore, exposure of the cadmium stored in the\n23 tunnel to leachate is not considered a credible occurrence.\n24 3.5.1.6 Barium\n25 Presently, barium is stored in Tunnel Number 2 in stainless steel containers received from the\n26 324 Building. The waste was generated during numerous research and development programs conducted\n27 in B-Cell of the Waste Technology Engineering Laboratory (324 Building). The existence of barium\n28 within the 324 Building waste was determined through process knowledge.\n29 Barium exhibits the characteristic of toxicity as determined by the toxicity characteristics leaching\n30 procedure and is designated D005 [WAC 173-303-090(8)].\n31 The potential for barium stored in Tunnel Number 2 to become exposed to leachate is considered\n32 negligible. Tunnel Number 2 is designed and constructed to be weather-tight. Further, the barium is\n33 encased in steel containers stored on a railcar above the floor level of the tunnel. Therefore, exposure of\n34 the barium stored in the tunnel to leachate is not considered a credible occurrence.\n35 3.5.1.7 Mineral Oil\n36 Presently, mineral oil is stored in Tunnel Number 2 in stainless steel containers received from the\n37 324 Building. The mineral oil was used in the B-Cell viewing windows in the 324 Building. Oil leaking\n38 from the windows was absorbed on rags and clay absorbent material.\n39 The material safety data sheet for the mineral oil lists a lethal dose (LD50) of 2 grams per kilogram\n40 (dermal rabbit). Therefore, the oil designates as a Toxic Category A WTO2 [WAC 173-303-100(5)].\n41 The potential for the absorbed mineral oil stored in Tunnel Number 2 to become exposed to leachate is\n42 considered negligible. Tunnel Number 2 is designed and constructed to be weather-tight. Further, the\n43 mineral oil is encased in steel containers stored on a railcar above the floor level of the tunnel. Therefore,\n44 exposure of the mineral oil stored in the tunnel to leachate is not considered a credible occurrence.\nChapter 3.13\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1 3.5.1.8 Identification of Incompatible Waste\n2 The next step is to ensure that sufficient information concerning the waste has been provided so the waste\n3 can be managed properly. This includes identifying incompatible waste. These safety issues primarily\n4 are related to prevention of unwanted chemical reactions that could create a catastrophic situation, such as\n5 a fire, an explosion, or a large chemical release.\n6 3.5.1.9 Operational Considerations\n7 Sufficient information must be available to ensure that incoming waste meets operational acceptance\n8 limits, e.g., physical size, ALARA concerns, and WAC 173-303 requirements. These operating\n9 specifications are limits and controls imposed on a process or operation that, if violated, could jeopardize\n10 the safety of personnel, and could damage equipment, facilities, or the environment. Operating\n11 specifications have been established from operating experience, process knowledge, and calculations.\n12 3.5.2 Parameter and Rationale Selection Process\n13 This WAP describes the process to ensure that the dangerous waste components of the material stored in\n14 the tunnels are properly characterized and designated so that dangerous and mixed waste is managed\n15 properly.\n16 The parameters considered for waste designation under WAC 173-303-070(3) and the rationale for there\n17 application is discussed in the following sections.\n18 3.5.2.1 Discarded Chemical Products\n19 The first category of dangerous waste designation is \"Discarded Chemical Products\"\n20 (WAC 173-303-081). The waste stored in the tunnels does not fit the definitions in WAC 173-303-081\n21 for a discarded chemical product. Therefore, the waste stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels is not\n22 designated as a discarded chemical product.\n23 3.5.2.2 Dangerous Waste Sources\n24 The second category of dangerous waste designation is \"Dangerous Waste Sources\" (WAC 173-303-082).\n25 The waste stored in the tunnels is not listed on the \"Dangerous Waste Sources List\"\n26 (WAC 173-303-9904). Therefore, the waste stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels is not designated as a\n27 dangerous waste source.\n28 3.5.2.3 Dangerous Waste Characteristics\n29 The third category of dangerous waste designation is \"Dangerous Waste Characteristics\"\n30 (WAC 173-303-090). The characteristics are as follows.\n31 * Characteristic of Ignitability -Although the solid silver nitrate has not been tested in accordance\n32 with Appendix F of 49 CFR 173, the waste is assumed to be an oxidizer as specified in\n33 49 CFR 173.127(a). Therefore, the silver nitrate waste is assumed to exhibit the characteristic of\n34 ignitability under WAC 173-303-090(5) and is designated as D001.\n35 * Characteristic of Corrosivity -Some of the material stored within the tunnels either has contained\n36 or has been in contact with corrosive liquids. The standard operating procedure has been to flush\n37 vessels with water to recover as much special nuclear material as practical. In addition, flushing\n38 removes much of the mixed waste contamination, minimizing the spread of contamination during\n39 handling. Currently, the final aqueous rinse is sampled and analyzed to confirm that the pH is\n40 greater than 2 and less than 12.5. Therefore, the waste stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels is\n41 not designated as corrosive waste.\nChapter 3.14\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1 * Characteristic of Reactivity -The waste stored in the tunnels does not meet any of the definitions\n2 of reactivity as defined in WAC 173-303-090(7). The waste material is not unstable, does not\n3 react violently with water, does not form explosive mixtures, or does not generate toxic gases.\n4 Therefore, the waste stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels is not designated as reactive waste.\n5 * Characteristic of Toxicity -Lead, mercury, silver, chromium, barium, and cadmium are identified\n6 on the Toxicity Characteristics list. The quantity of these materials stored in the tunnels is\n7 sufficient that, should the substances come in contact with a leachate (an event considered\n8 unlikely), the concentration of the extract could be above the limits identified in the list.\n9 Therefore, this waste is designated D005, D006, D007, D008, D009, and DOI 1.\n10 The PUREX Storage Tunnels also are permitted for selenium (DO10). Currently, there is no waste stored\n11 in the tunnels that is designated for DOI; however, there is a potential for waste with this waste number\n12 to be stored within the tunnels.\n13 3.5.2.4 Dangerous Waste Criteria\n14 The fourth category of dangerous waste designation is \"Dangerous Waste Criteria\" (WAC 173-303-100).\n15 The criteria are as follows:\n16 * Toxicity Criteria- Cadmium meets the toxicity criteria in WAC 173-303-100(5) when\n17 performing a book designation. Because of the concentrations present, the waste containing these\n18 constituents is designated as dangerous waste (DW) and is assigned the dangerous waste number\n19 of WT02.\n20 * Persistence Criteria -Currently, no waste stored in the tunnels has been designated as persistent\n21 per WAC 173-303-100(6).\n22 3.5.2.5 Waste Designation Summary\n23 The mixed waste currently stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels is designated as follows:\n24 * Lead -D008; EHW\n25 * Mercury -D009; EHW\n26 * Silver and silver salts -DOOI, DO11; EHW\n27 * Chromium -D007; EHW\n28 * Cadmium -D006, WTO2; DW\n29 * Barium -D005; EHW\n30 * Mineral Oil -WTO2; DW\n31 3.5.3 Rationale for Parameter Selection\n32 Refer to Section 3.5.2.\n33 3.5.4 Special Parameter Selection\n34 Refer to Section 3.5.2.\n35 3.5.5 Selection of Sampling Procedures\n36 The following sections discuss the sampling methods and procedures that will be used. Sampling usually\n37 will be in accordance with requirements contained in the pertinent sampling analysis plan, procedures,\n38 and/or other documents that specify sampling and analysis parameters.\n39 3.5.6 Sampling Strategies\n40 The only analysis presently used in support of the PUREX Storage Tunnels operation is a corrosivity\n41 check on the final in-place aqueous rinse of discarded vessels before the vessels are released for storage.\n42\nChapter 3.15\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1 The pH is determined by a pH meter using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Test\n2 Method 9040 or 9041 in Test Methods for the Evaluation of Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods\n3 (EPA 1986). The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) sampling will not be performed on\n4 any waste currently stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels.\n5 Waste received that is not generated at the PUREX Plant could require sampling strategies associated\n6 with this waste that will be developed on a case-by-case basis.\n7 Sampling Methods\n8 Process knowledge of the characteristics and the quantities of the dangerous waste to be stored in the\n9 PUREX Storage Tunnels is considered sufficient to properly designate and manage the stored waste.\n10 The waste currently stored in the tunnels is lead, mercury, chromium, cadmium, barium, mineral oil,\n11 silver, and silver salts. Sampling and chemical analysis of the lead, mercury, cadmium, barium, mineral\n12 oil, or chromium to confirm their presence would not provide additional data beneficial to proper\n13 management of the waste and would not comply with ALARA principles. The silver salts are dispersed\n14 over a large area on ceramic packing contained within a large stainless steel reactor vessel.\n15 Representative sampling of the ceramic packing is not considered to be practical and therefore was not\n16 performed.\n17 If RCRA sampling is required for operation of the PUREX Storage Tunnels, representative sampling\n18 methods referenced in WAC 173-303-110 or some other method approved by the Washington State\n19 Department of Ecology (Ecology) will be used. For waste received from other Hanford Facility activities,\n20 existing sampling, chemical analysis, and/or process knowledge documentation is used to confirm the\n21 characteristics and quantities of mixed waste to be stored. Storage of non-PUREX Facility waste is\n22 reviewed on a case-by-case basis.\n23 3.5.6.1 Frequency of Analyses\n24 Because the dangerous waste components of mixed waste stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels are\n25 stable and will remain undisturbed for a long time, the waste designations and quantities present will\n26 remain the same as assigned at the time of storage. Therefore, repeated analysis is not considered\n27 necessary to ensure that waste designation data are representative.\n28 3.5.7 Selection of Sampling Equipment\n29 The only analysis presently used in support of the PUREX Storage Tunnels operation is for corrosivity on\n30 the final in-place aqueous rinse of discarded vessels before the vessels are released for storage. The pH is\n31 determined by Method 9040 or 9041 (SW-846). The RCRA sampling methods, as referenced in\n32 WAC 173-303-110, will not be performed on any waste currently stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels.\n33 3.5.8 Maintaining and Decontaminating Field Equipment\n34 All RCRA sampling equipment used to collect and transport samples must be free of contamination that\n35 could alter test results. Equipment used to obtain and contain samples must be clean. Acceptable\n36 cleaning procedures for sample bottles and equipment include, but are not limited to, washing with soap\n37 or solvent, and steam cleaning. After cleaning, cleaning residues must be removed from all equipment\n38 that could come in contact with the waste. One method to remove these residues would be a solvent\n39 (acetone or other suitable solvent) rinse followed by a final rinse with deionized water. Equipment must\n40 be cleaned before use for another sampling event.\n41 After completion of sampling, equipment should be cleaned as indicated previously. If decontamination\n42 of the equipment is not feasible, the sampling equipment should be disposed of properly.\nChapter 3.16\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1 3.5.9 Sample Preservation and Storage\n2 Following RCRA sampling, sample preservation follows methods set forth for the specific analysis\n3 identified. Preservation is in accordance with the methods stated in SW-846 or any of the test methods\n4 adopted by the Hanford Facility that meet WAC 173-303 requirements. No preservation method will be\n5 used when there are ALARA concerns.\n6 3.5.10 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Procedures\n7 The only test method presently used in support of the PUREX Storage Tunnels operation is a corrosivity\n8 check on the final in-place aqueous rinse of discarded vessels before the vessels are released for storage.\n9 The RCRA sampling will not be performed on any waste currently stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels.\n10 Field duplicates, field blanks, trip blanks, and equipment blanks will not be taken. Split samples could be\n11 taken at the request of Ecology.\n12 Generally, quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) requirements for sampling will be divided\n13 between paperwork requirements, such as chain-of-custody, and sampling and analysis activities. This\n14 section addresses sampling QA/QC requirements. Analytical QA/QC is discussed in Section 3.6.\n15 A chain-of-custody procedure is required for all sampling identified by this WAP. At a minimum, the\n16 chain of custody must include the following: (1) description of waste collected, (2) names and signatures\n17 of samplers, (3) date and time of collection and number of containers in the sample, and (4) names and\n18 signatures of persons involved in transferring the samples.\n19 3.5.11 Health and Safety Protocols\n20 The safety and health protocol requirements established for the Hanford Site must be followed for all\n21 RCRA sampling activities required by this WAP.\n22 3.6 Laboratory Selection and Testing and Analytical Methods\n23 This section discusses laboratory selection and the types of acceptable analytical methods for RCRA\n24 samples.\n25 3.6.1 Laboratory Selection\n26 Laboratory selection is limited as only a few laboratories are equipped to handle mixed waste because of\n27 the special equipment and procedures that must be used to minimize personnel exposure to mixed waste.\n28 Laboratory selection depends on laboratory capability, nature of the sample, timing requirements, and\n29 cost. At a minimum, the selected laboratory must have the following:\n30 * A comprehensive QA/QC program (both qualitative and quantitative).\n31 * Technical analytical expertise.\n32 * An effective information management system.\n33 These requirements will be met if the selected laboratory follows the pertinent requirements contained in\n34 the Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order Action Plan, Section 6.5. The selected\n35 laboratory also can meet these requirements by having some other type of QA/QC program as long as\n36 equivalent data quality is achieved.\n37 3.6.2 Testing and Analytical Methods\n38 The testing and analytical methods for corrosivity used by the various onsite analytical laboratories are\n39 outlined in SW-846. These methods in some cases deviate from SW-846 and American Society for\n40 Testing and Materials-accepted specifications for holding times, sample preservation, and other specific\n41 analytical procedures. These deviations are discussed in Analytical Methods for Mixed Waste Analyses\n42 at the Hanford Site (DOE/RL-94-97).\nChapter 3.17\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1 3.7 Waste Re-Evaluation Frequencies\n2 Re-evaluation of waste within the PUREX Storage Tunnels will not occur because of the personnel and\n3 environmental exposure to mixed waste and the way the railcars are positioned in the tunnels. The waste\n4 is expected to remain stable.\n5 3.8 Special Procedural Requirements\n6 The following sections describe special procedural requirements associated with waste in the PUREX\n7 Storage Tunnels.\n8 3.8.1 Procedures for Receiving Wastes Generated Offsite\n9 The PUREX Storage Tunnels do not accept waste generated off the Hanford Site.\n10 3.8.2 Procedures for Ignitable, Reactive, and Incompatible Waste\n11 Presently, the only ignitable, reactive, or incompatible dangerous waste stored in the PUREX Storage\n12 Tunnels is the silver nitrate coating on the ceramic packing inside the silver reactors. This material is\n13 confined to the interior of a large stainless steel vessel (Section 3.5.1.1) that separates this material from\n14 all other waste material stored in the tunnel. The requirements in WAC 173-303-395(1)(a) require\n15 'No Smoking' signs be conspicuously placed wherever there is a hazard present from ignitable or\n16 dangerous waste. 'No Smoking' signs are not considered appropriate at the PUREX Storage Tunnels\n17 because of ALARA principles. Smoking is not allowed in any area with ALARA concerns and rules\n18 prohibiting smoking are strictly enforced. This policy serves to achieve the no smoking intent of\n19 WAC 173-303-395(1)(a), posting and maintaining 'No Smoking' signs are not considered appropriate.\n20 Isolated areas within the PUREX Storage Tunnels make periodic inspections inconsistent with ALARA\n21 guidelines[e.g., an annual fire inspection as required by WAC 173-303-395(1)(d) for storage areas\n22 containing ignitable waste]. Therefore, such inspections are not performed.\n23 3.8.3 Provisions for Complying with Land Disposal Restriction Requirements\n24 Operation of the PUREX Storage Tunnels does not involve land disposal or treatment of dangerous\n25 waste. The information provided by the generating unit regarding land disposal restrictions of dangerous\n26 waste is sufficient to operate the PUREX Storage Tunnels in compliance with land disposal restriction\n27 requirements. When final disposition of the waste occurs, this information will be passed on for final\n28 treatment or disposal of the waste.\n29 3.8.4 Deviations from the Requirements of this Plan\n30 Management may approve deviations from this plan if special circumstances arise that make this prudent.\n31 These deviations must be documented in writing with a copy to be retained by the management.\n32 3.9 Recordkeeping\n33 Records associated with this waste analysis plan and waste verification program are maintained on the\n34 Hanford Facility. These records will be maintained until closure of the PUREX Storage Tunnels.\n35 Records associated with the waste inventory will be maintained for 5 years.\n36 3.10 References\n37 Ecology, EPA, and DOE, 2003, Hanford Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, Washington\n38 State Department of Ecology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and U.S Department of Energy,\n39 Richland, Washington, amended periodically.\n40 DOE/RL-94-97, Analytical Methods for Mixed Waste Analyses at the Hanford Site, Rev. 0,\n41 U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington.\n42 EPA, 1986, Test Methods for the Evaluation of Solid Waste: Physical/Chemical Methods, SW-846,\n43 3rd ed., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.\nChapter 3.18\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1 Table 3.1. PUREX Storage Tunnels Inventory\n2 PUREX #1 Storage Tunnel (218-E-14)\n3 Tunnel #1 is at its Capacity as of 1/22/65\n4 PUREX #1 Storage Tunnel is located at the southeast end of the PUREX Plant and is an extension of the\n5 railroad tunnel. The storage area is approximately 109 meters long, 6.9 meters high, and 5.8 meters wide.\n6 The tracks have a one percent downgrade toward the south end of the tunnel. The capacity of the Storage\n7 Tunnel is eight modified railroad cars, 12.8 meters long.\nPosition PUREX #1 Storage Tunnel (218-E-14)\n1. & 2. HA column and miscellaneous jumpers in box placed in Tunnel #1 on 6/60 HA 4,700 Cu. Ft.\nJumpers 2,190 Cu. Ft., Pb-115 Kg\n3. E-Fl 1 #1 (IWW Waste) Concentrator failed 7/24/60. Placed in Tunnel #1 on 7/29/60,\n1,900 Cu. Ft.\n4. G-E2 Centrifuge, miscellaneous jumpers in box and two tube bundles. Placed in Tunnel #1\non 12/24/60. (FUG SER# 762) 2,465 Cu. Ft., Pb-1 15 Kg.,\n5. E-H4 (3WB) Concentrator failed 1/4/61. Placed in Tunnel #1 on 1/4/61, 2,336 Cu. Ft.\n6. E-F6 (2\\NW Waste) Original Concentrator failed 4/21/61. Placed in Tunnel #1 on 4/21/61,\n2,336 Cu. Ft.\n7. E-FI 1 (1WW Waste) #2 Concentrator failed 2/1/62. Placed in Tunnel #1 on 2/8/62,\n2,336 Cu. Ft.\n8. E-F6 (2WW Waste) #3 Spare Concentrator failed 5/23/64. Placed in Tunnel #1 on 1/22/65\nFlat Car 3621, 2400 Cu. Ft.\n8\n9 Table 3.1. PUREX Storage Tunnels Inventory (con't)\n10 The storage area is approximately 514.5 meters long, 7.9 meters high, and 10.4 meters wide. The tracks\n11 have a one percent downgrade toward the south end of the tunnel. The capacity of the Storage Tunnel is\n12 38-40 modified railroad cars, 12.8 meters long. The Tunnel contains 21 cars as of 2/95.\nPosition PUREX #2 Storage Tunnel (218-E-15)\n1. E-F6 # (2WW Waste) Concentrator, TK F 15-2, One tube bundle and agitator motors, placed\nin Tunnel on 12/12/67 on Car 61439. 2,400 Cu. Ft.\n2. E-F6 #5 (E-H4 3WB) Concentrator, two tube bundles placed in Tunnel on 3/26/69. On\nCar MILW 60883, 2,400 Cu. Ft.\n3. E-F6 #6 (2WW Waste) Concentrator, two tube bundles failed placed in Tunnel on 3/19/70.\nOn Car 3612, 2,400 Cu. Ft.\n4. L Cell Package in a sealed steel box (H2-66012) placed in Tunnel on 12/30/70 on\nCar MILW 60033, 2,400 Cu. Ft.\n5. F2 Silver Reactor, F6 Demister, Vessel Vent Line, Steel Catwalk and Guard Rails, placed in\nTunnel on 2/26/71. On Gondola Car 4610, 2,400 Cu. Ft., Ag-625 Kg\n6. Modified A3-1 tower, scrubber, liquid, and vapor line placed in Tunnel on 12/12/71. On\nGondola Car 4611, 2,400 Cu. Ft.\n7. A3 Dissolver placed in Tunnel on 12/22/71. On 9 Ft. shortened Car B58, 2,400 Cu. Ft.,\nChapter 3.19\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nPosition PUREX #2 Storage Tunnel (218-E-15)\nHg---45 Kg.\n8. AIWI Fuel ends in steel liner box and NPR fuel handling equipment. Used with the\nsuspected canisters, on Car 19808. Placed in Tunnel on 8/29/72, 800 Cu. Ft.\n9. C3 Dissolver placed in Tunnel on 9/30/72, on Car 19811, 1590 Cu. Ft., Hg--45 Kg.\n10. E-H4 (3WB) Concentrator, #61 tube bundle, prototype cooling coil, and F-Fl Filter Tank,\nplaced in Tunnel 8/30/83, on Car CDX-1, 2,400 Cu. Ft.\n11. A3 Dissolver (Vessel #10 and Heater Vessel #6), placed in Tunnel on 1/18/86, on Car 3613,\n3960 Cu. Ft. Hg-40 Kg., Cd--43 Kg\n12. White box (H2-58456) containing eight tube bundles #S 57.\n13. J5 Tank (Vessel #30), FL condenser (Vessel #13), and Fl2-B Cell Block, old four-way\ndumper, disc yoke, and flange plate placed in Tunnel on 1/21/86, on Car 19806,\n2,500 Cu. Ft.\n14. L-1 Pulser, 2-column cartridges, 1-jumper cutter, 3-jumper alignment tools, 9-exterior\ndumping trunnions, 10-pumps, 3-agitators, 4-tube bundles, 2-vent jumpers and 7-yokes\nplaced in Tunnel on 11/18/87, on Car PX-10 (IOA-19380) & Rack H2-96629.50. 50 tons,\n3,600 Cu. Ft., Pb--2540 Kg.\n15. Silver Reactor, E-F2 steam heater, and storage liner (H2-65095), full of cut up jumpers\nplaced in Tunnel on 5/13/88, on Car PX-9 (IOA-19809) & S/R Cradle SK-GLR-1 1-2-87.\n20 tons, 2,775 Cu. Ft., Cd--13 Kg., Ag-- 15 Kg., Pb--230 Kg.\n16. E-48-1 Unitized Concentrator Vessel #1 H2-52477, failed 3/11/89. Placed on storage\nCar H2-99608, Px-6 (IOA-19028) and in #2 Tunnel 4/6/89 graveyards. Estimated 42 tons,\n6,000 Cu. Ft.\n17. North storage liner H2-65095 containing six pumps, one agitator, and cut up jumper\n(14 tons). South storage liner H2-65095 containing one pump, one #15 yoke and cut up\njumpers (11.5 tons). Placed on storage Car PX-19 (IOA-19030) and in #2 Tunnel on days\n8/5/89. Estimated 25.5 tons, 2,574 Cu. Ft.\n18. T-F5 Acid absorber, ID#1-T-F5/F-168713, H2-52535 and H2-52487/488. Placed on storage\nCar PX-2 and in #2 Tunnel on 4/8/94. Estimated 22 tons, 835 Cu. Ft.\n19. Four metal liner storage boxes H-2-65095-3/H-2-100187-0 containing failedjumpers and\nmiscellaneous obsolete canyon equipment items. Placed on storage Car PX-23 and in\n#2 Tunnel 9/16/94. Estimated 60 tons, 4032 Cu. Ft.\n20. E-H4-1 unitized concentrator (H-2-52477/56213)/(E-H4-1) Placed in Tunnel on 1/27/95, on\nCar Px-28. Estimated 40 tons, 5,760 Cu. Ft., Cr--8 Kg.\n21. Tank E-5 (H-2-52453)/(F-166955), lead storage box assembly (H-2-131629)/\n(H-2-131629-1), H4 concentrator tower (H-2-5 8102)/(F-223 017-CBT-4), hot shop cover\nplate (H-2-52222)/(\"Q\"), tube bundle wash capsule (H-2-58647), dissolver charging\ninsert (H-2-75875)/ (H-2-75875-1), lifting yoke #7A (H-2-96837), lifting yoke #9 (H-2-\n52458). Placed in tunnel on 2/8/95 on Car PX-3609. Estimated 44 tons, 3,457 Cu. Ft.,\nPb-~1830 Kg\n22. Metal liner box (H-2-65096) containing jumpers and failed/obsolete canyon equipment.\nF7 neutron monitor (H-2-75825), lead storage box (H-2-131629) containing jumper\ncounterweights and miscellaneous lead items, scrap hopper (H-2-57347) containing\nChapter 3.20\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nPosition PUREX #2 Storage Tunnel (218-E-15)\nmiscellaneous canyon equipment, canister capping station (H-2-821831), test canister\ncontaining various lengths of carbon steel pipe. Placed in Tunnel on 3-11-06, on Car #3616.\nEstimated weight 22 tons, 1,712 Cu. Ft., Pb--3232 Kg., Cd-2 Kg.\n23. Two burial boxes (H-2-100187) containing jumpers and failed/obsolete canyon equipment,\nlifting yoke (H-2-99652). Placed in Tunnel 3-11-96 on Car #PX-3 1. Estimated weight\n21 tons, 2,116 Cu. Ft.\n24. Concrete burial box (H-1-44980) storing 8 containers of 324 Building, B-Cell waste. For\nadditional details, see PUREX Work Plan WP-P-95-60. Placed in Tunnel on Car #PX-29,\non April 26, 1996. Estimated weight 36 tons, 1,890 Cu. Ft. Cd-10.5 kg., absorbed oil--8.5\nkg., Cr--I kg., Ba-- 3 kg\n25. Concrete burial box (H-1-44980) storing 9 containers of 324 and 325 Building waste. For\nadditional details, see PUREX Work Plan WP-P-96-015. Placed in tunnel on\nCar #IOA-3619, on June 12, 1996. Estimated weight 46.5 tons, 1,890 Cu. Ft. Ba-~4g.,\nCd-<1g., Cr-2g., Pb- <lg\n26. 20,000-gallon liquid waste tank Car HO-IOH-18580, empty per RCRA, placed in Tunnel on\nJune 19, 1996, approximately 30 tons.\n27. 20,000 gallon liquid waste tank Car HO-IOH-18579, empty per RCRA, placed in Tunnel on\nJune 19, 1996, approximately 30 Tons\n28. 20,000-gallon liquid waste tank Car HO-IOH-18582, empty per RCRA, placed in Tunnel on\nJune 19, 1996, approximately 30 tons.\n1\n2\nChapter 3.21\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nChapter 3.22\n I\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nCHAPTER 4.0\nPROCESS INFORMATION\nChapter 4.i\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\n6\nChapter 4.ii\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1\n2 CHAPTER 4.0\n3 PROCESS INFORMATION\n4\n5\n6 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n7 4.0 PROCESS INFORMATION ..................................... ......... 5\n8 4.1 Operation of the PUREX Storage Tunnels ........................................... 5\n9 4.1.1 Preparation for Tunnel Activities ................................. .......... 5\n10 4.1.2 Tunnel Storage Activities ................................................ 6\n11 4.1.3 Removal of Stored Material...................7............ .............. 7\n12 4.1.4 Filling the Water-Fillable Door (Tunnel Number 2) .................... ............ 7\n13 4.1.5 Post Storage Activities.................................................. 8\n14 4.1.6 Operation of the Tunnel Ventilation System ......................... .............. 8\n15 4.2 Containers .......................................................... 8\n16 4.2.1 Containers with Free Liquids .............................................. 8\n17 4.2.2 Containers without Free Liquids that do not Exhibit Ignitability or Reactivity ...... .......9\n18 4.2.3 Protection of Extremely Hazardous Waste in Containers .............................. 9\n19 4.2.4 Prevention of Reaction of Ignitable, Reactive, and Incompatible Waste in Containers............ 10\n20 4.3 Engineering Drawings ........................................... ....... 10\n21\n22 FIGURE\n23 Figure 4.1. Water Fillable Door Exterior (Tunnel Number 2) ................... ........... 12\n24\n25\nChapter 4.iii\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nChapter 4.iv\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1 4.0 PROCESS INFORMATION\n2 This chapter discusses the processes involved in the operation of the Plutonium Uranium Extraction\n3 Facility (PUREX) Storage Tunnels. The PUREX Storage Tunnels are used for the storage of mixed\n4 waste from the PUREX Plant and other onsite sources.\n5 The PUREX Storage Tunnels were designed and constructed to provide a means of protecting personnel\n6 and the environment from exposure to mixed waste associated with stored material. This design also\n7 serves to protect personnel and the environment from the dangerous waste component of the mixed waste\n8 stored inside the tunnels.\n9 The PUREX Storage Tunnels are being permitted as a miscellaneous unit under Washington\n10 Administrative Code (WAC) 173-303-680. The WAC regulations require that miscellaneous unit permit\n11 terms and provisions address appropriate requirements provided for other treatment, storage, and disposal\n12 (TSD) units. Because the operation and construction of the PUREX Storage Tunnels most closely\n13 resemble that of a container storage unit, the appropriate requirements prescribed for a container storage\n14 unit are addressed in this chapter.\n15 4.1 Operation of the PUREX Storage Tunnels\n16 This section describes the selection, characterization, preparation, placement, and removal activities\n17 associated with storage of mixed waste in the PUREX Storage Tunnels.\n18 4.1.1 Preparation for Tunnel Activities\n19 Management, with the concurrence of an appropriate cognizant engineer, determines when material is to\n20 be removed and transported to the PUREX Storage Tunnels. A job specific work plan describing the\n21 overall transfer activities is prepared.\n22 4.1.1.1 Storage/Removal Equipment Preparation\n23 A remotely controlled, battery-powered locomotive normally was used to move railcars into and out of\n24 the PUREX Storage Tunnels. Other mechanical means such as a standard locomotive or a winch also\n25 can be used independently or in combination with the remote locomotive should the need arise. Methods\n26 for use of the remote locomotive are described in this chapter as this represents the normal placement and\n27 removal of railcars at the PUREX Storage Tunnels. Should storage activities require the use of a\n28 mechanical means other than the remote locomotive to place or withdraw a railcar, methods for that\n29 application will be developed.\n30 Preparatory activities associated with the remote-controlled locomotive included the following:\n31 * Charging the batteries for both the locomotive and the radio transmitter.\n32 * Performing operational checks.\n33 * Installing a plastic shroud over the locomotive to facilitate decontamination.\n34 * Installing an anticoupling device on the south coupler of the locomotive (storage only).\n35 * Performing physical inspections of the railroad track within the railroad tunnel to ensure that the\n36 track switches are positioned properly and the track is clear of obstructions.\n37 4.1.1.2 Water-Fillable Door Preparation\n38 Each PUREX Storage Tunnel has a water-fillable door that isolates the storage area from the PUREX\n39 railroad tunnel.\n40 Currently, the water-fillable door to Tunnel Number 2 is empty and is not expected to be filled.\n41 Operational checks are performed on the door hoists. Before performing operational checks on the\n42 water-fillable door, the operator confirms with a dispatcher that the railroad tunnel area is clear of\n43 personnel.\nChapter 4.5\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1 4.1.1.3 Other Preparation Tasks\n2 Before material storage, the following preparatory tasks are completed.\n3 * The storage tunnel exhaust fan is verified to be operating.\n4 * Labels will be attached to the railcar in accordance with WAC 173-303-395(6) and\n5 173-303-630(3) if the material contains dangerous waste components.\n6 4.1.2 Tunnel Storage Activities\n7 This section describes the placement of material within the PUREX Storage Tunnels.\n8 4.1.2.1 Physical Characterization of Material to be Stored\n9 Physical characterization includes an evaluation of the following physical properties:\n10 * Length, width, and height.\n11 * Gross weight and volume.\n12 * Preferred orientation for transport and storage.\n13 * Presence of mixed waste.\n14 Information sources used in physical characterization include equipment fabrication and installation\n15 drawings, operational records, and process knowledge. Physical characterization provides information\n16 necessary to appropriately describe the mixed waste materials. Such information also is used to design\n17 and fabricate, if required, supports on the railcar.\n18 Specific material known to contain constituents that would cause the equipment to be designated as\n19 mixed waste is discussed in the waste analysis plan (Chapter 3.0). The material includes but is not\n20 limited to dissolvers that contain elemental mercury; silver reactors that contain silver salts; jumpers and\n21 other equipment that have elemental lead counterweights; a concentrator that contains chromium;\n22 neutron absorbing equipment containing cadmium. Characteristics of these materials when stored as\n23 mixed waste are described in Chapter 3.0. Waste transferred to the PUREX Storage Tunnels from other\n24 than PUREX Plant also would be physically characterized.\n25 4.1.2.2 Material Flushing\n26 Before removal from service, the material from the PUREX Plant was flushed to minimize loss of\n27 products, to reduce contamination, and to reduce to nonregulatory levels the concentration of any\n28 dangerous chemicals present in a residual heel. In the future the analysis of the rinsate will be used to\n29 determine when these goals have been achieved. The analysis of the final flush will be retained as part of\n30 the PUREX Storage Tunnel records. Material removed from other onsite units will be prepared for\n31 transfer to the tunnels in accordance with this dangerous waste permit.\n32 4.1.2.3 Railcar Preparation\n33 Railcars are modified to serve as dedicated storage platforms and transporters for material placed in the\n34 PUREX Storage Tunnels. The wooden decking on the railcars is removed to minimize the amount of\n35 combustible material placed in the PUREX Storage Tunnels. The south coupler is disabled or removed\n36 to prevent the railcar from coupling to the railcar stored ahead. Brakes are disabled to ensure\n37 freewheeling of the railcar. Steel decking, catch pans filled with absorbent, and equipment cradles are\n38 provided as needed to modify the railcar for its specific task.\n39 4.1.2.4 Placement of Material into Storage Position\n40 With all preparations complete and with the approval of cognizant management, transferring material to\n41 the PUREX Storage Tunnels proceeds as follows.\nChapter 4.6\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1 * The water-fillable door to the storage tunnel is opened.\n2 * The railcar is loaded as specified in the storage tunnel checklist.\n3 * An inventory of items loaded on the railcar and a record of their location on the railcar are\n4 recorded in the storage tunnel checklist.\n5 * A survey is obtained of the loaded railcar at a distance commensurate with ALARA practices.\n6 * The railcar is pushed into the storage tunnel to its storage position.\n7 * Once the railcar is in position, the water-fillable door is closed.\n8 4.1.3 Removal of Stored Material\n9 Removal of material stored within the PUREX Storage Tunnels is not conducted routinely. It is planned\n10 that the material will remain in storage until a means to accommodate processing and repackaging of the\n11 material for disposal or further storage or until another final disposition option becomes available.\n12 Removal of material from storage within the PUREX Storage Tunnels would proceed after the\n13 preparation activities identified in Section 4.1.1.\n14 With all preparations complete and approval of management, removal of material from the storage area\n15 of the PUREX Storage Tunnels would proceed as follows.\n16 * The equipment that will be used to remove material is positioned in the PUREX railroad tunnel.\n17 * Verification is made that the PUREX railroad tunnel is configured properly to proceed with\n18 entrance into the PUREX Storage Tunnels (i.e., tunnel ventilation system is operating, the\n19 overhead door is closed and a survey of the area is performed for as low as reasonably achievable\n20 [ALARA] concems).\n21 * The water-fillable door is opened.\n22 * The equipment that will be used to remove material is moved into the storage tunnel and\n23 connected to the railcar.\n24 * Verification is made that the railcar is connected to the removal equipment and the railcar is\n25 extracted from the storage tunnel and positioned within the PUREX railroad tunnel.\n26 * The water-fillable door is closed.\n27 The loaded railcar retrieved from the tunnel would be remotely viewed and measurements may be\n28 obtained to determine the possibility of mixed waste containment failure during storage in the PUREX\n29 Storage Tunnels. If evidence of containment failure is detected, the specific details (i.e., material,\n30 location on railcar, storage position) would be documented and attached to the waste tracking form. This\n31 information would be maintained in the files and would be used to establish sampling locations within\n32 the tunnels at closure. After remote viewing and surveying, the railcar and associated material may be\n33 prepared as required for transfer to an appropriate onsite TSD unit for treatment or further storage.\n34 4.1.4 Filling the Water-Fillable Door (Tunnel Number 2)\n35 If shielding beyond that provided by the empty water-fillable door becomes necessary, the door can be\n36 filled with water. In the past, this was accomplished by connecting a fire hose from the water hydrant to\n37 the wall stub on the exterior of the door housing (Figure 4.1). Once the fire hose was in place, the\n38 hydrant valve was opened and the door was filled with water.\n39 The hydrant was closed by personnel when a high-level indicator light illuminated. Although attendance\n40 by an operator is required at all times during filling operations, should the door overfill, excess water is\n41 channeled through a vent/spill pipe to the door sump. A 15.2-centimeter drain is provided in each door\n42 sump. Water accumulated in the door sump was pumped out to the Double-Shell Tank System, and the\n43 sump and drain were made inoperable during PUREX Facility deactivation activities.\nChapter 4.7\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nI The drain was sealed during PUREX Facility deactivation. In the future, a temporary source of water\n2 could be provided for filling the water-fillable door.\n3 4.1.5 Post Storage Activities\n4 The following post storage activities would conclude the tunnel storage task.\n5 * Decontamination activities, if required, are performed.\n6 * Management is notified of any unusual conditions observed during the storage/retrieval\n7 activities.\n8 4.1.6 Operation of the Tunnel Ventilation System\n9 The ventilation systems for Tunnel Number I and Tunnel Number 2 were designed to ventilate air from\n10 within the tunnels so the airborne contamination is vented through a High Efficiency Particulate Air\n11 (HEPA) filtered exhaust system.\n12 4.1.6.1 Tunnel Number 1 Ventilation\n13 Active ventilation of Tunnel Number I presently is not provided. After placement of the last railcar into\n14 Tunnel Number 1, the tunnel was sealed (Chapter 2.0). As part of the sealing activities, the ventilation\n15 fan was deactivated electrically and the exhaust stack and filter were isolated from the system by\n16 installing blanks upstream and downstream of both the exhaust fan and filter and the stack was removed.\n17 In the event railcar removal activities are initiated, it is planned that the ventilation system would be\n18 reactivated. Operation of the ventilation system would be similar to that for Tunnel Number 2.\n19 4.1.6.2 Tunnel Number 2 Ventilation\n20 The Tunnel Number 2 ventilation system presently is inactive. As part of PUREX Facility deactivation,\n21 the water-fillable door and outer PUREX railroad tunnel door were sealed. The seal may be temporary or\n22 permanent depending on the future need for storing waste in the tunnel. The ventilation system may be\n23 operated continuously, or de-energized and reactivated during waste placement activities. During\n24 deactivation, a blank was installed on the downstream side of the filter and the stack was capped. When\n25 the determination has been made that Tunnel Number 2 will no longer receive waste, the ventilation\n26 system will be blanked and deactivated electrically similar to the Tunnel Number I ventilation system.\n27 While the Tunnel Number 2 ventilation system is operating and the water-fillable door is closed, the\n28 exhaust system, which discharges approximately 100 cubic meters per minute, maintains a slightly\n29 negative pressure in the tunnel. The exhaust air is replaced by infiltration around the water-fillable door\n30 and through the porosity of the tunnel structure (e.g., the rail-bed ballast). When the water-fillable door\n31 is open (during transfer activities), inward airflow is maintained through the open doorway. This inward\n32 airflow channels airborne radioactive contamination away from both the railroad tunnel and personnel\n33 following railcars (if allowed) into the storage tunnel. A HEPA filter provides filtration of all exhaust air\n34 before release to the atmosphere. When the ventilation system is operating, the HEPA filter is tested in\n35 place at least annually to ensure radioactive particulate removal efficiency. Exhausted air is sampled\n36 periodically and analyzed for airborne radionuclides.\n37 4.2 Containers\n38 This section describes the various types of containment used to isolate mixed waste stored in the PUREX\n39 Storage Tunnels. The PUREX Storage Tunnels are considered to be a miscellaneous unit most closely\n40 resembling that of a container storage unit. The mixed waste stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels is\n41 contained and is not considered a risk to human health or to the environment.\n42 4.2.1 Containers with Free Liquids\n43 The only mixed waste stored as a free liquid is elemental mercury. A small quantity, less than 1.7 liters,\n44 of mercury is contained in each of the two thermowells attached to and contained within each dissolver\n45 (Chapter 3.0).\nChapter 4.8\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nI Primary containment of the mercury is provided by the all-welded construction of the thermowell itself,\n2 which is fabricated from 7.6-centimeter, Schedule 80, 304L stainless steel pipe. The open upper end of\n3 the thermowell was plugged with a 304L stainless steel nozzle plug in preparation for storage. The\n4 dissolver rests on a cradle on its railcar in an inclined position. This ensures that the mercury remains in\n5 the lower portion of the thermowell and is not in contact with the mechanical closure on the nozzle end\n6 of the thermowell.\n7 A secondary containment barrier for mercury, should it leak from the thermowell, is provided by the\n8 dissolver itself. The dissolver is a 304L stainless steel process vessel constructed from\n9 1-centimeter-thick plate and is approximately 2.7 meters in diameter. The dissolver is of all-welded\n10 construction and contains no drains or nozzle outlets in the bottom several feet of its lower section, which\n11 contains both thermowells.\n12 The 304L stainless steel used to contain the elemental mercury is both compatible with the waste itself\n13 and the storage environment. The potential for significant deterioration of either the primary or\n14 secondary containment barrier material before closure is considered to be negligible.\n15 The dissolvers stored within the PUREX Storage Tunnels are not labeled as containing characteristic\n16 toxic mercury (D009) rWAC 173-303-090(8)(c)]. Procedures for labeling were not in place at the time\n17 of storage. Personnel access into the storage area for purposes such as labeling is not feasible and cannot\n18 be justified under ALARA guidelines. Based on ALARA, mixed waste presently within the PUREX\n19 Storage Tunnels will remain unlabeled. However, during future transfers of mixed waste into the\n20 PUREX Storage Tunnels the railcars will be labeled as specified by WAC 173-303-395(6) and\n21 WAC 173-303-630(3).\n22 4.2.2 Containers without Free Liquids that do not Exhibit Ignitability or Reactivity\n23 Most lead is fully contained in all-welded encasements of either carbon steel or 304L stainless steel\n24 (refer to Chapter 3.0, Table 1). The encasement serves as support, protection against mechanical\n25 damage, and protection of the lead from exposure to the environment. Also, lead has been placed in\n26 burial boxes of appropriate size. The boxes provide secondary containment for the lead in the unlikely\n27 event the primary encasement should fail. Although boxes may be open on the top, the PUREX Storage\n28 Tunnels are enclosed; therefore, the containers are protected from the elements.\n29 Both carbon steel and 304L stainless steel used to encase the lead are compatible with the waste and the\n30 storage environment. Significant deterioration of either the primary or secondary containment barrier\n31 materials before closure is not considered to be credible.\n32 In the past, material that contains lead or that has encased lead attached was not labeled as containing\n33 characteristic toxic lead (D008) [WAC 173-303-090(8)], because the requirements were not yet on line.\n34 As stated in Section 4.2.1, personnel entry into the tunnel storage area for purposes of labeling would be\n35 inconsistent with ALARA guidelines. However, during future storage of material containing lead the\n36 railcars will be labeled in accordance with WAC 173-303-395(6) and WAC 173-303-630(3).\n37 4.2.3 Protection of Extremely Hazardous Waste in Containers\n38 The present amount of mixed waste stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels is sufficient to characterize\n39 this material as extremely hazardous waste. Because the PUREX Storage Tunnels are enclosed totally,\n40 protective covering from the elements and from run-on is provided for the storage of extremely\n41 hazardous waste. Periodic inspection of the equipment stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels is not\n42 feasible and cannot be justified under ALARA guidelines. Safe management of this waste is based on\n43 the following considerations.\n44 * The operation of the PUREX Storage Tunnels is passive, i.e., once a storage position is filled, the\n45 storage position remains undisturbed until closure.\nChapter 4.9\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nI * The extremely hazardous waste is compatible with its storage container and the storage\n2 environment.\n3 4.2.4 Prevention of Reaction of Ignitable, Reactive, and Incompatible Waste in\n4 Containers\n5 There is no reactive or incompatible waste known to be stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels. The only\n6 mixed waste stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels considered an ignitable waste is the silver nitrate in\n7 Tunnel Number 2. The silver nitrate fraction of the silver salts, within the silver reactors, exhibits the\n8 characteristic of ignitability as defined in 49 CFR 173.127(a). Therefore, the silver salts are managed as\n9 an ignitable dangerous waste in accordance with WAC 173-303-395.\n10 * The risk of fire associated with the storage of silver nitrate in the PUREX Storage Tunnels is\n11 considered to be extremely low. This conclusion is based on the following considerations.\n12 * The operation of the PUREX Storage Tunnels is passive; i.e., once a storage position is filled, the\n13 storage position remains undisturbed until closure.\n14 * The silver nitrate is contained within large, heavy-walled stainless steel vessels that isolate the\n15 silver nitrate from contact with any combustibles that might be in the tunnels.\n16 * The silver nitrate is dispersed over a large surface area on a ceramic packing substraight and is\n17 not conducive to build-up of heat that could lead to spontaneous combustion.\n18 * Personnel access to the occupied areas of the tunnels is not permitted, thereby precluding\n19 activities that could present a fire hazard (e.g., smoking, flame cutting, welding, grinding, and\n20 other electrical activities).\n21 Although ignitable waste storage units are required by WAC 173-303-395(l)(d) to have inspections\n22 conducted at least yearly by a fire marshall or professional fire inspector familiar with the requirements\n23 of the uniform fire code, the ALARA concerns within the PUREX Storage Tunnels make such\n24 inspections impractical. These inspections are not considered appropriate or necessary for the safe\n25 operation of the unit because of the nature of the ignitable waste, the means of storage, and ALARA\n26 concerns (Chapter 6.0, §6.2).\n27 4.3 Engineering Drawings\n28 As-built drawings for the PUREX Storage Tunnels:\nH-2-55587 218-E-14 Structural Floor Plan and Section\nH-2-55588 Structural Sections and Details: Disposal Facility for Failed Equipment\nH-2-55589 Structural Sections and Details: Disposal Facility for Failed Equipment\nH-2-55590 Door and Hoist Details\nH-2-55591 Door and Hoist Details\nH-2-55592 Door and Hoist Details\nH-2-55593 Electrical Details\nH-2-55594 Shielding Door Fill and Drain Lines Arrangement: Disposal Facility for Failed\nEquipment\nH-2-55599 Electrical Door Control Plan, Elementary Diagram and Miscellaneous Details: Disposal\nFacility for Failed PUREX Equipment\nH-2-58134 Ventilation Details; Sheet 1, Sheet 2, Sheet 3, Sheet 4\nH-2-58175 PUREX Tunnel\nChapter 4.10\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nH-2-58193 Sump Details\nH-2-58194 Sump Details\nH-2-58195 Structural Sections and Details: Equipment Disposal -PUREX\nH-2-58206 Sump Details\nH-2-58208 Fan Details; Sheet 1, Sheet 2, Sheet 3\nH-2-94756 Filter Details; Sheet 1, Sheet 2\n1\n2\nChapter 4.11\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nDoor Pump\nHoist Controls\nSwioc High-Level Fire HoseDoor Light CabinetHoist\nControls\na Hydrant\nFigure 4.1. Water Fillable Door Exterior (Tunnel Number 2)\nChapter 4.12\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nCHAPTER 11.0\nCLOSURE AND FINANCIAL ASSURANCE\nChapter 11.i\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\n6\nChapter 11 .ii\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1\n2 CHAPTER 11.0\n3 CLOSURE AND FINANCIAL ASSURANCE\n4\n5\n6 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n7 11.0 CLOSURE AND FINANCIAL ASSURANCE ........................ .........5\n8 11.1 In Situ Disposal Options ............. ...................... ................ 5\n9 11.1.1 Backfilling the PUREX Storage Tunnels with Gravel ................... .........5\n10 11.1.2 Injecting the PUREX Storage Tunnels with Grout ...................... .........5\n11 11.1.3 Combination of Grout Injection and Backfilling ............ 5....................\n12 11.2 Retrieval/Clean Closure Options ........................ 6..... ............ 6\n13 11.2.1 Retrieval and Disposal in the PUREX Plant ...................... ...... .......6\n14 11.2.2 Retrieval and Physical Processing (size reduction) in the PUREX Plant and\n15 Subsequent Disposal ........................................... ....... 6\n16 11.2.3 Construction of a New Facility for Retrieval, Processing, and Treatment of\n17 Equipment for Disposal................ ..................... ......... 6\n18\n19\nChapter 11.iii\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nChapter 11.iv\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1 11.0 CLOSURE AND FINANCIAL ASSURANCE\n2 Closure of the Plutonium Uranium Extraction Facility (PUREX) Storage Tunnels requires coordination\n3 with closure of the PUREX Plant to ensure a cost effective closure for both units. In addition, the nature\n4 of the mixed waste located within the PUREX Plant and PUREX Storage Tunnels precludes the\n5 determination of the type of treatment and/or disposition of the waste at this time.\n6 The PUREX Storage Tunnels will be managed as a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)\n7 storage unit until closure can be coordinated with the final closure plan for the PUREX Plant. The\n8 PUREX Storage Tunnels closure plan will be submitted after any required National Environmental\n9 Policy Act of 1969 documentation and land usage agreements, which initiate disposition and aid in\n10 identifying or developing necessary disposition activities, have been adopted. The PUREX Storage\n11 Tunnels closure plan will be submitted for the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology)\n12 approval with the PUREX Plant closure plan.\n13 The PUREX Storage Tunnels closure plan will be written to meet the requirements of Washington\n14 Administrative Code (WAC) 173-303-140 and WAC 173-303-610. This closure plan might consider but\n15 will not be limited to the following options for either in situ disposal or retrieval/clean closure of this\n16 unit.\n17 Federal facilities are not required to comply with WAC 173-303-620 as is stated in the regulations and as\n18 described in Hanford Facility RCRA Permit, WA7890008967 (Permit) Condition II.H.3.\n19 11.1 In Situ Disposal Options\n20 This closure plan might consider but will not be limited to the following options for in situ disposal of\n21 waste in this unit.\n22 11.1.1 Backfilling the PUREX Storage Tunnels with Gravel\n23 This option could involve backfilling the tunnels with gravel to eliminate void space and prevent ground\n24 subsidence. A modified commercially available centrifugal rock-throwing device could be placed in\n25 newly constructed risers evenly spaced along each tunnel roof. Fill material could be supplied and\n26 dispersed into the tunnels by automated controls. Following the fill process, all equipment could be\n27 removed from the tunnel roofs and all means of access to the tunnels could be permanently sealed. Final\n28 activities could involve the construction of a final surface barrier that meets RCRA landfill cover\n29 requirements to prevent water from leaching mixed waste contained in the tunnels.\n30 11.1.2 Injecting the PUREX Storage Tunnels with Grout\n31 This option could involve the injection of grout material into each tunnel to stabilize and immobilize\n32 contained materials and prevent ground subsidence. A grout injector could be alternately placed in\n33 newly constructed risers evenly spaced along each tunnel roof. Grout material could be supplied and\n34 dispersed into the tunnels by automated controls. The grout material could be injected in lifts to\n35 accommodate curing and heat dissipation normally associated with the use of this type of material. Final\n36 activities could involve the construction of a final surface barrier that meets RCRA landfill cover\n37 requirements to prevent water from leaching mixed waste contained in the tunnels.\n38 11.1.3 Combination of Grout Injection and Backfilling\n39 This option combines grout injection with gravel backfilling similar to the processes discussed\n40 previously. Grout could be injected first to fill void spaces under the railcars and provide a basal\n41 structure. Gravel could be dispersed to fill remaining void space and prevent ground subsidence. Final\n42 activities could involve the construction of a final surface barrier that meets RCRA landfill cover\n43 requirements to prevent water from leaching mixed waste contained in the tunnels.\nChapter 11.5\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1 11.2 Retrieval/Clean Closure Options\n2 This closure plan might consider but will not be limited to the following options for retrieval/clean\n3 closure of this unit.\n4 11.2.1 Retrieval and Disposal in the PUREX Plant\n5 Railcars stored in both tunnels could be remotely retrieved one at a time and moved beneath the\n6 horizontal door of the railroad tunnel extension for remote viewing, and if possible, characterization.\n7 Transfer procedures could be initiated to move waste material from the railcars to the PUREX Plant\n8 canyon deck area. Following transfer of the waste material, the railcars could be decontaminated and\n9 removed for final disposition at other onsite units. Final disposition of the waste transferred to the\n10 canyon deck area could be in accordance with PUREX Plant closure documentation. The PUREX\n11 Storage Tunnels could be closed after submittal and implementation of a PUREX Storage Tunnels\n12 closure plan in conjunction with PUREX Plant closure documentation. The PUREX Storage Tunnels\n13 closure plan will detail verification sampling and analysis to be performed as a part of closure activities.\n14 11.2.2 Retrieval and Physical Processing (size reduction) in the PUREX Plant and\n15 Subsequent Disposal\n16 Retrieval of waste material stored in the tunnels could be similar to that described in the previous section.\n17 Once the waste material was transferred to the PUREX Plant canyon deck area, characterization and size\n18 reduction of waste material could proceed. An area located on the canyon deck or in a process cell could\n19 be modified to include all necessary equipment to perform characterization and size reduction activities.\n20 Size reduction could be performed through various technologies that include, but are not limited to, flame\n21 cutting, water jet cutting, sawing, or other technologies. Final disposition of the processed waste\n22 material either onsite or offsite could be in accordance with regulations and procedures in place at that\n23 time. The PUREX Storage Tunnels could be closed after submittal and implementation of a PUREX\n24 Storage Tunnels closure plan in conjunction with PUREX Plant closure documentation. The PUREX\n25 Storage Tunnels closure plan will detail verification sampling and analysis to be performed as a part of\n26 closure activities.\n27 11.2.3 Construction of a New Facility for Retrieval, Processing, and Treatment of\n28 Equipment for Disposal\n29 This option involves the construction of a new unit that is either mobile or stationary to excavate,\n30 retrieve, and treat waste material stored in the tunnels. The unit could be constructed in a manner\n31 consistent with the retrieval and handling requirements for large, contaminated waste material.\n32 Following retrieval, the waste material could be treated in accordance with final onsite or offsite\n33 disposition requirements identified at such time. The excavated tunnels could have a temporary surface\n34 barrier placed in position until verification and sampling analysis could be performed as a part of closure\n35 activities to be performed in conjunction with PUREX Plant closure.\nChapter 11.6\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1\n2 ADDENDUME\n3 SECURITY\n4\n5\nAddendum E.i\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum E.ii\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n2 ADDENDUME\n3 SECURITY\n4\n5\n6 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n7 E. SECURITY ............................................................... 5\n8 E.1 Security .................................................................. 5\n9 E.1.1 Waiver. ................................................................... 5\n10\n11\nAddendum E.iii\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum E.iv\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1 E. SECURITY\n2 This addendum discusses security for the Plutonium Uranium Extraction Facility (PUREX) Storage\n3 Tunnels.\n4 E.1 Security\n5 The Permittees will post signs at access points to the PUREX Storage Tunnels stating, DANGER-\n6 UNAUTHORIZED PERSONNEL KEEP OUT, or an equivalent legend. These signs will be written in\n7 English, legible from a distance of 7.6 meters, and visible from any approach to the active portion.\n8 [WAC 173-303-310(2)(a)].\n9 E.1.1 Waiver\n10 A waiver of the security procedures and equipment requirements for the PUREX Storage Tunnels is not\n11 requested. Therefore, the requirements of WAC 173-303-310(1)(a) and (b) are not applicable to the\n12 PUREX Storage Tunnels.\nAddendum E.5\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum E.6\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nADDENDUM F\nPREPAREDNESS AND PREVENTION\nAddendum F.i\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum F.ii\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1\n2 ADDENDUM F\n3 PREPAREDNESS AND PREVENTION\n4\n5\n6 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n7 F. PREPARDENESS AND PREVENTION. ...................................... 5\n8 F. I Preparedness and Prevention Requirements....................................5\n9 F, 1. 1 Equipment Requirements................................................5\n10 F. 1.2 Aisle Space Requirement................................................5\n11 F.2 Preventive Procedures, Structures, and Equipment...............................5\n12 F.2. 1 Unloading Operations..................................................5\n13 F.2.2 Runoff ............................................................ 6\n14 F.2.3 Water Supplies....................................................... 6\n15 F.2.4 Equipment and Power Failures ................................................. 6\n16 F.2,5 Personnel Protection Equipment ................................................ 7\n17 F.3 Prevention of Reaction of Ignitable, Reactive, and/or Incompatible Waste....................7\n18\nAddendum F.iii\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum F.iv\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nI F. PREPARDENESS AND PREVENTION\n2 F.1 Preparedness and Prevention Requirements\n3 This addendum discusses preparedness and prevention measures for the Plutonium Uranium Extraction\n4 Facility (PUREX) Storage Tunnels.\n5 F.1.1 Equipment Requirements\n6 The following sections describe the internal and external communications systems and emergency\n7 equipment required.\n8 F.1.1.1 Internal Communications\n9 The PUREX Storage Tunnels are not occupied and personnel entry is allowed only on a very limited basis\n10 and under close supervision. Normal and emergency communications equipment (portable two-way\n11 radios) is available for use.\n12 F.1.1.2 External Communications\n13 External communications equipment for summoning emergency assistance from the Hanford Fire\n14 Department and/or emergency response teams are provided by two-way portable radios or other devices.\n15 F.1.1.3 Emergency Equipment\n16 Equipment included in the emergency plan for the PUREX Storage Tunnels is provided in Addendum J.\n17 F.1.1.4 Water for Fire Control\n18 The fire hazard associated with the operation of the PUREX Storage Tunnels is considered to be very low\n19 because of the minimal amount of combustibles stored within the tunnels and the lack of an ignition\n20 source. In the event it is determined there is a fire in the storage area of the tunnels, the contingency plan\n21 will be activated. Because of the potential of the mixed waste stored within the tunnels to leach, the use\n22 of water for fire control will be avoided if possible. Reductions of the air supply to the storage area by\n23 isolation of the tunnel exhaust system, if operating, should permit the fire to self-extinguish. Should the\n24 fire continue to propagate, heavy equipment and cranes will be called to the scene to cover areas of the\n25 tunnels that might collapse. Heavy equipment and cranes are readily available on the Hanford Facility at\n26 all times and generally are available for deployment to the scene of an emergency within 1 hour. In the\n27 event that a fire resulted in the collapse of the tunnels, a recovery plan will be developed in accordance\n28 with emergency response procedures included in Addendum J. The recovery plan will take into\n29 consideration plans, if any, for retrieval of the waste stored within the tunnel(s).\n30 F.1.2 Aisle Space Requirement\n31 Requirements for aisle space are not considered appropriate for the safe operation of the PUREX Storage\n32 Tunnels and were not included in design documents.\n33 F.2 Preventive Procedures, Structures, and Equipment\n34 The following sections describe preventive procedures, structures, and equipment.\n35 F.2.1 Unloading Operations\n36 Operation of the PUREX Storage Tunnels does not involve the loading or unloading of dangerous waste.\n37 All loading and unloading operations are conducted at the PUREX Facility or other onsite units.\n38 Therefore, the requirements of WAC 173-303-806(4)(a)(viii)(A) are not applicable to the PUREX\n39 Storage Tunnels.\nAddendum F.5\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1 F.2.2 Runoff\n2 The design of the PUREX Storage Tunnels included consideration and provisions for the control of runoff\n3 and run-on. Construction of both tunnels included the application of a moisture barrier before placement\n4 of the soil overburden. On Tunnel Number 1, 40.8-kilogram mineral surface roofing was applied to the\n5 external surfaces of the structural timbers (top and sides). The roofing material was nailed in place with\n6 an overlap of approximately 10 centimeters at all joints and seams. All interior and exterior steel surfaces\n7 of Tunnel Number 2 were coated with at least a 0.9-millimeter bituminous, solvent coal tar base, coating\n8 compound. The coating was applied using a two coat system, with each coat not less than\n9 0.45 millimeters, ensuring a total dry film thickness of not less than 0.9 millimeter.\n10 The soil overburden covering the PUREX Storage Tunnels also is contoured to provide a side slope of\n11 2 (horizontal) to 1 (vertical). This construction serves to divert any seasonal or unanticipated run-on\n12 away from the storage area of the PUREX Storage Tunnels. For potential situations where a natural\n13 catastrophic event occurs, inspections of the tunnel side slopes are conducted to ensure the contours\n14 remain in a condition that ensures proper runoff and continues to divert run-on away from the tunnel\n15 storage areas.\n16 Run-on at the PUREX Storage Tunnels is controlled by the design features of the exterior of the tunnels\n17 that serve to divert run-on away from the interior of the tunnels. Additionally, all waste within the tunnels\n18 is stored well above the floor level on railcars. The control of run-on combined with the storage of all\n19 waste above the floor elevation provides adequate assurance that runoff will not occur at the PUREX\n20 Storage Tunnels.\n21 F.2.3 Water Supplies\n22 Water was supplied to the PUREX Storage Tunnels from the PUREX Plant. This water was used for the\n23 sole purpose of filling the water-fillable doors should it have been determined necessary. There are no\n24 other sources or uses of water at the PUREX Storage Tunnels. The line that supplied water to the\n25 PUREX Storage Tunnels was blanked and emptied during deactivation activities. In the future, a\n26 temporary source of water would be provided for filling the water fillable door.\n27 F.2.4 Equipment and Power Failures\n28 The procedures, structures, and equipment used to mitigate the effects of equipment failure and power\n29 outage are described in the following sections.\n30 F.2.4.1 Mitigation of the Effects of Equipment Failure\n31 Maintaining safe storage of materials in the PUREX Storage Tunnels is not contingent on continued\n32 operation of equipment. The operable equipment associated with the PUREX Storage Tunnels were the\n33 remote controlled locomotive or waste placement and removal equipment, the railcars, and the water-\n34 fillable door and ventilation system for both tunnels. No operable equipment is associated with either\n35 tunnel, as these tunnels have been sealed and may no longer receive dangerous waste. Backup or\n36 redundant systems are not provided for either tunnel, as failure of the equipment would not have the\n37 potential to result in a release of dangerous waste to the environment. There are no hazards associated\n38 with tunnel equipment failure.\n39 F.2.4.2 Mitigation of the Effects of Power Failure\n40 Maintaining safe storage of materials in the PUREX Storage Tunnels is not contingent on continued\n41 supply of electrical power. Electrical power is required to operate the water-fillable door and the\n42 ventilation fan in both tunnels. Backup or redundant ventilation systems are not provided as the system is\n43 operated only to maintain air balance and provide secondary control of mixed waste airborne particulate.\n44 Power failure to either tunnel would not have the potential to result in the release of dangerous waste or\n45 mixed waste to the environment. There are no hazards associated with the shutdown of the tunnel\n46 ventilation systems due to loss of electrical power.\nAddendum F.6\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nI F.2.5 Personnel Protection Equipment\n2 Personnel entering the PUREX Storage Tunnels are required to wear special protective clothing and\n3 respiratory protection at all times because of the material stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels.\n4 Protective clothing and full-face respirators with filters are considered to be sufficient protection from the\n5 dangerous waste stored within the PUREX Storage Tunnels. Personnel are trained and qualified in using\n6 the protective equipment and are checked routinely for mask fit.\n7 F.3 Prevention of Reaction of Ignitable, Reactive, andlor Incompatible Waste\n8 There is no reactive or incompatible waste stored in the PUREX Storage Tunnels. The only ignitable\n9 waste stored within the tunnels is silver nitrate. The silver nitrate is present within the silver reactors\n10 (deposited on unglazed ceramic packing) stored in Tunnel Number 2.\n11 Although silver nitrate exhibits the characteristic of ignitability, it is contained within stainless steel\n12 vessels, stored on railcars above the floor level, and isolated from combustible materials and other\n13 dangerous waste. Additional measures to prevent reaction of the ignitable waste are not considered\n14 necessary.\n15\nAddendum F.7\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum F.8\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nADDENDUM G\nPERSONNEL TRAINING\nAddendum G.1\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum G.2\n WA7890008967\nPUJREX Storage Tunnels\nADDENDUMG\n2 PERSONNEL TRAINING\n3 PUREX Storage Tunnels Training Matrix\nTraining Category'\nPermit General\n(WA7890008967) Hanford Emergency\nFacility Contingency Coordinator\nTraining Category Training Plan Training Training Operations Training\nPUREX Storage Emergency\nTunnels DWTP Response Emergency General\nP1 Orientation (Contingency Coordinator Waste Misc.\nProgram Plan) Training Management Unit\nJob title/position\nNuclear Chemical X X X XOperator\nD&D worker X X\nOperations Manager X X\nField Work Supervisor X X\nEnvironmental .\nCompliance Officer\nBuilding Emergency X XDirector\n4-\nI Refer to the Dangerous Waste Training Plan (DWTP) prepared for PUREX Storage Tunnels for a complete\ndescription\nAddendum G.3\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum G.4\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nADDENDUM I\nINSPECTION REQUIREMENTS\nAddendum.I.i\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum.I.ii\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n2 ADDENDUMI\n3 INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS\n4\n5\n6 TABLE OF CONTENTS\n7 I. INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS ...................... 5...... ................. 5\n8 1.1 PUREX Storage Tunnels ..................................................... 5\n9\n10 TABLES\n11 Table 1.1. Inspection Schedule .................................................. 5\n12\n13\nAddendum.I.iii\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum.I.iv\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n1 1. INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS\n2 This Addendum discusses the inspection requirements for dangerous waste management units within the\n3 Plutonium Uranium Extraction Facility (PUREX) Storage Tunnels.\n4 1.1 PUREX Storage Tunnels\n5 Because waste within the PUREX Storage Tunnels is inaccessible and exposure to the mixed waste would\n6 be extremely hazardous to personnel, inspection of the tunnel interior will not be performed. External\n7 inspections of the tunnels will be performed annually. The inspection schedule, log, and records will be\n8 maintained in the Hanford Facility Operating Record, PUREX Storage Tunnels File for a minimum of\n9 5 years.\n10 Information from inspections will be recorded on inspection logs. The log forms are used to initiate\n11 corrective action if necessary. The elements inspected at the PUREX Storage Tunnels are identified in\n12 Table 1.1. Abnormal conditions are recorded, evaluated, and corrective action initiated as necessary.\n13 Table 1.1. Inspection Schedule\ninspectionRequirement Description Freten Types of ProblemsFrequency\nPerform external surveillance of Annual External surfaces of the PUREX\nPUREX Storage Tunnels Storage Tunnels are observed for\nevidence of structural deterioration.\nTunnel subsidence, erosion of the\nearth cover, and vent stack damage\nare of primary concern.\nThe points of access to the PUREX\nStorage Tunnels are inspected to\nensure warning signs are in place,\nvisible, and legible.\n14\nAddendum.I.5\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\n2\n3\n4 This page intentionally left blank.\n5\nAddendum.I.6\n WA7890008967\nPUREX Storage Tunnels\nOFFICIAL USE ONLY\nThis information has been identified as Official Use Only.\nOfficial Use Only (OUO) information is certain unclassified information that may be exempt from public\nrelease under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and has the potential to damage governmental,\ncommercial, or private interests if disseminated to persons who do not need to know the information to\nperform their jobs or other DOE-authorized activities.\nPer the U.S. Department of Energy's Official Use Only Policy and DOE Order 471.3, Administrative\nChange 1, \"Identifying and Protecting Official Use Only Information\" and DOE M 471.3.1\nAdministrative Change 1, \"Manual for Identifying and Protecting Official Use Only Information,\" the\nfollowing document and associated changes is granted confidentiality and is exempt from public review:\nTitle: Addendum J: Contingency Plan\nOFFICIAL USE ONLY\nThis information is exempt from public inspection and copying.\n"
} |
[
-0.11883839964866638,
0.04829868674278259,
-0.0025480559561401606,
-0.011011209338903427,
0.05195074528455734,
0.010291832499206066,
0.1154332384467125,
0.0007007909007370472,
-0.08592535555362701,
-0.07065396010875702,
0.0013317164266481996,
-0.035472381860017776,
0.018434155732393265,
-0.006737178191542625,
0.024402987211942673,
-0.029503243044018745,
-0.058138374239206314,
-0.05043954402208328,
-0.020765526220202446,
0.029036032035946846,
-0.06367600709199905,
0.024029914289712906,
0.0262432973831892,
-0.006037362851202488,
-0.011076544411480427,
-0.0014006864512339234,
-0.018619801849126816,
0.03277004510164261,
0.0028860096354037523,
-0.05694391578435898,
-0.04394163936376572,
0.025414075702428818,
0.08790954202413559,
-0.02499123103916645,
-0.03668315336108208,
0.0062413448467850685,
-0.06646791845560074,
-0.0671444833278656,
0.020564241334795952,
0.04238877445459366,
0.021880215033888817,
-0.04288247600197792,
-0.03437700495123863,
0.06146686151623726,
0.0656372681260109,
-0.0785202905535698,
0.029487011954188347,
0.010798297822475433,
0.06332410126924515,
-0.04508465901017189,
-0.01823394186794758,
-0.027721041813492775,
-0.0036737609189003706,
-0.03659451752901077,
0.054250262677669525,
-0.02085655927658081,
0.015034922398626804,
-0.060095224529504776,
0.016393909230828285,
-0.03323858231306076,
0.01750349812209606,
-0.0005952207720838487,
-0.16348379850387573,
0.08492093533277512,
-0.07583844661712646,
0.0161097701638937,
0.048382941633462906,
-0.007598146330565214,
-0.024985475465655327,
0.05949747934937477,
0.0658901110291481,
-0.03513742983341217,
0.0008843158720992506,
-0.11567969620227814,
0.049390342086553574,
0.03360460326075554,
0.055154237896203995,
0.026383694261312485,
0.053694359958171844,
0.038932498544454575,
0.0004393816343508661,
0.0180604699999094,
-0.09288253635168076,
-0.004073987249284983,
-0.0008234609267674387,
-0.04883106052875519,
-0.006677441764622927,
-0.023541681468486786,
-0.03813307359814644,
0.05245159938931465,
-0.042493823915719986,
-0.055899728089571,
0.08681583404541016,
-0.04896170645952225,
-0.08339672535657883,
-0.0457635223865509,
0.029042238369584084,
0.03465776517987251,
-0.08649188280105591,
0.4062184691429138,
0.03594949096441269,
0.018697189167141914,
0.0979783833026886,
-0.007865204475820065,
0.023714108392596245,
-0.05756505951285362,
-0.06109985336661339,
-0.006620500702410936,
0.007060033269226551,
0.021669859066605568,
-0.024405108764767647,
-0.033514637500047684,
0.00025015627034008503,
0.03170765936374664,
0.04407161846756935,
0.09463243186473846,
-0.035580113530159,
-0.0045343064703047276,
0.043714847415685654,
0.00020504710846580565,
-0.002858717693015933,
-0.024884076789021492,
0.0037606365513056517,
0.014041258953511715,
0.07781578600406647,
-0.1323145031929016,
0.0068764761090278625,
-7.2201250750405e-33,
0.007334581576287746,
0.002726183971390128,
0.012147537432610989,
-0.002440247917547822,
0.027932560071349144,
0.03927065059542656,
0.003743888111785054,
-0.04643532633781433,
-0.014492551796138287,
0.05360198765993118,
0.006590632256120443,
0.03664784133434296,
-0.023135676980018616,
0.03275369852781296,
0.07811082899570465,
0.009627518244087696,
0.007964123040437698,
0.0028742437716573477,
-0.0018807238666340709,
0.004691542126238346,
-0.012402275577187538,
-0.0008041393011808395,
-0.023038707673549652,
0.04297299310564995,
-0.028259985148906708,
-0.06694644689559937,
0.038539037108421326,
-0.07085712999105453,
0.020109260454773903,
0.001460324041545391,
0.0014639950823038816,
0.049912355840206146,
-0.02594558522105217,
0.0008223677286878228,
-0.03757276013493538,
-0.028740663081407547,
0.03337514027953148,
-0.07462829351425171,
-0.035983964800834656,
0.025680823251605034,
-0.050139084458351135,
0.010837196372449398,
-0.04243791848421097,
-0.002668545348569751,
-0.004916265141218901,
0.16647927463054657,
-0.0011541391722857952,
-0.004960660357028246,
-0.06482207775115967,
0.06976216286420822,
-0.0028182310052216053,
-0.02132517658174038,
-0.11613703519105911,
0.04333868995308876,
-0.0033509607892483473,
-0.020106570795178413,
0.016554009169340134,
-0.043971188366413116,
0.020619438961148262,
-0.009089959785342216,
0.009713641367852688,
0.039391469210386276,
-0.012487754225730896,
0.009350251406431198,
-0.08647788316011429,
-0.04851773753762245,
0.02447775937616825,
-0.008494960144162178,
0.023063570261001587,
-0.012638214975595474,
-0.05100997909903526,
0.03675990551710129,
0.03771744668483734,
0.030916057527065277,
-0.028798431158065796,
-0.01926880143582821,
-0.019831717014312744,
0.03583517670631409,
0.08063048869371414,
0.00649732630699873,
0.03545527532696724,
-0.041958946734666824,
0.006693818140774965,
-0.024078864604234695,
0.09502369910478592,
0.054634999483823776,
0.004220988135784864,
-0.05180729925632477,
0.01021517813205719,
-0.041098661720752716,
-0.03574559465050697,
0.06131820008158684,
-0.0030944310128688812,
0.08796171098947525,
0.006000818684697151,
4.4925641867161134e-33,
-0.07716735452413559,
0.01899317093193531,
-0.03573813661932945,
0.0887979194521904,
-0.01755509153008461,
-0.0027626880910247564,
0.037273939698934555,
0.09013677388429642,
-0.09250447154045105,
0.0680299699306488,
0.022390201687812805,
-0.045089662075042725,
0.030878892168402672,
0.044495198875665665,
-0.005799654871225357,
0.03523358702659607,
0.06968843936920166,
-0.004063474480062723,
-0.028155116364359856,
-0.03572935611009598,
-0.030507177114486694,
-0.03237851336598396,
-0.0024998304434120655,
0.034929435700178146,
-0.04148077219724655,
0.030205287039279938,
0.04858911409974098,
0.0632987916469574,
-0.021693143993616104,
0.036800533533096313,
0.03896567225456238,
-0.023581488057971,
-0.05063262954354286,
-0.05820295587182045,
0.04826247692108154,
0.08404397964477539,
0.03678114339709282,
-0.0007768925279378891,
0.024848245084285736,
-0.05051735043525696,
0.039668887853622437,
-0.010082785040140152,
0.002244437113404274,
0.11697717010974884,
-0.021961307153105736,
-0.005805923603475094,
-0.048092879354953766,
0.003788944333791733,
0.035172659903764725,
0.07729728519916534,
-0.09319712221622467,
-0.011992926709353924,
-0.021968109533190727,
0.04129430651664734,
-0.022958293557167053,
0.004160518292337656,
-0.0432187058031559,
0.0702132061123848,
-0.01905948668718338,
0.0004752702370751649,
0.005480603780597448,
0.026761434972286224,
-0.033612821251153946,
0.01346849836409092,
-0.022746674716472626,
0.03873894736170769,
-0.024523282423615456,
-0.03632815554738045,
-0.0017924589337781072,
-0.052569907158613205,
0.006689464673399925,
-0.025846485048532486,
-0.1348353624343872,
0.0011394252069294453,
-0.047169335186481476,
-0.05347497761249542,
-0.018427148461341858,
-0.007304163184016943,
-0.009657083079218864,
-0.037726134061813354,
-0.033999841660261154,
0.01841733604669571,
-0.008003143593668938,
-0.005512353032827377,
-0.03353199362754822,
-0.0201805979013443,
0.021665804088115692,
0.01075822301208973,
-0.05747472122311592,
0.01969684660434723,
-0.007240809965878725,
0.023037107661366463,
0.12023406475782394,
0.0032419958151876926,
0.010150063782930374,
-1.3403668397415913e-8,
-0.046724583953619,
0.04062063992023468,
-0.05561641603708267,
-0.0018853341462090611,
0.056323979049921036,
0.049638908356428146,
-0.04154156893491745,
0.0325038842856884,
0.02574923262000084,
-0.018780937418341637,
0.06920813769102097,
0.02598794549703598,
-0.02782331220805645,
0.05757509544491768,
0.09128093719482422,
-0.01532574463635683,
-0.10472093522548676,
-0.027585938572883606,
-0.016222817823290825,
-0.035399287939071655,
-0.010461363941431046,
-0.013999390415847301,
-0.0002939800324384123,
-0.08362972736358643,
0.007932317443192005,
0.006960071157664061,
-0.04422977939248085,
0.07475824654102325,
0.07440952211618423,
-0.04058071970939636,
-0.0018266832921653986,
0.01985001191496849,
0.014382191933691502,
0.020585300400853157,
0.02213379554450512,
-0.06437048316001892,
-0.06369856745004654,
0.01613914780318737,
0.009907381609082222,
-0.0055595203302800655,
-0.05467313155531883,
-0.0233115516602993,
0.07046928256750107,
0.006468005012720823,
-0.047700025141239166,
-0.0036470729392021894,
0.007837599143385887,
-0.004974569659680128,
-0.01241857185959816,
-0.07781214267015457,
-0.0009409073390997946,
-0.008002524264156818,
0.006034235469996929,
0.08434933423995972,
0.10730371624231339,
0.011427774094045162,
0.013366665691137314,
-0.012747352942824364,
0.061454374343156815,
0.03564131259918213,
0.1587459295988083,
0.12640950083732605,
0.04654904082417488,
-0.015717294067144394
] | {
"pdf_file": "HWLEW7RJBOFKM7YCQA66Q2E5AHR63KG4.pdf",
"text": " "
} |
[
0.0228265393525362,
-0.04825810343027115,
-0.0033610700629651546,
0.058179810643196106,
0.06636598706245422,
-0.0029861994553357363,
-0.009496361017227173,
0.020205646753311157,
-0.07593230158090591,
0.016222471371293068,
-0.01656571589410305,
-0.0826428234577179,
-0.010975329205393791,
0.008579953573644161,
-0.07245050370693207,
-0.02387894131243229,
0.11138220131397247,
-0.0032274110708385706,
-0.10415094345808029,
0.0247889906167984,
0.03165242448449135,
0.029708854854106903,
-0.015642201527953148,
-0.005654851906001568,
0.017774557694792747,
0.07949116080999374,
-0.12716150283813477,
-0.016186539083719254,
0.02869446761906147,
-0.020684394985437393,
-0.06032390147447586,
-0.002992303343489766,
-0.030090462416410446,
0.04460826516151428,
0.03249293193221092,
0.02600191906094551,
0.03297168388962746,
0.013059890829026699,
0.055674973875284195,
-0.0066828601993620396,
-0.007448348216712475,
-0.039031438529491425,
0.0010540429502725601,
0.015932127833366394,
-0.04817598685622215,
-0.0715709924697876,
0.048947788774967194,
0.015919383615255356,
-0.0046646445989608765,
0.08747817575931549,
0.06572891026735306,
0.06978999078273773,
-0.1099662333726883,
0.056985266506671906,
-0.04922350123524666,
-0.04463464766740799,
0.01867978274822235,
-0.005122080910950899,
-0.01710975356400013,
0.013439723290503025,
0.0009362075361423194,
0.007958810776472092,
0.027899296954274178,
-0.06796698272228241,
0.05351937189698219,
-0.011376548558473587,
-0.023395493626594543,
0.001483924686908722,
-0.10408129543066025,
-0.08684761822223663,
0.010847770608961582,
0.00011951952910749242,
-0.09200835227966309,
0.06421301513910294,
0.043426621705293655,
0.019002916291356087,
0.09169314056634903,
-0.002117652678862214,
0.04867967590689659,
-0.025401756167411804,
0.026227686554193497,
0.06425158679485321,
0.03253268823027611,
-0.03513288497924805,
-0.05995376408100128,
-0.023183774203062057,
-0.049333393573760986,
0.07354500144720078,
0.07610898464918137,
-0.005722183734178543,
-0.015601346269249916,
-0.12805642187595367,
0.023888694122433662,
0.035786014050245285,
0.0593065544962883,
0.03901926055550575,
-0.03259596601128578,
0.032703425735235214,
0.10421574115753174,
-0.029656754806637764,
0.047985777258872986,
-0.0033616204746067524,
0.04011957719922066,
-0.05176478624343872,
-0.0690118670463562,
-0.023819759488105774,
-0.03978533297777176,
0.09559644758701324,
-0.04263753816485405,
-0.024433180689811707,
-0.036837637424468994,
0.04536491259932518,
-0.057004209607839584,
-0.0623018741607666,
-0.012271836400032043,
0.0067162592895329,
0.07414384186267853,
-0.042649779468774796,
-0.06398475170135498,
-0.06727904826402664,
-0.0292508564889431,
-0.0004760636657010764,
0.05161828175187111,
-0.04869324713945389,
-0.0350770577788353,
-0.02954544685781002,
0.04499225690960884,
1.3544725492845966e-33,
-0.09122772514820099,
-0.11750029772520065,
0.06365617364645004,
0.009955382905900478,
0.005006929859519005,
0.018776684999465942,
0.014450105838477612,
-0.004704505670815706,
0.0511510856449604,
0.04694508761167526,
-0.07772976160049438,
0.12397821992635727,
-0.00406802911311388,
0.10930308699607849,
-0.0027399417012929916,
-0.05826835706830025,
0.04512101039290428,
-0.06756904721260071,
0.045930247753858566,
-0.10575573891401291,
-0.02945343218743801,
-0.055161744356155396,
0.0328490324318409,
0.040152184665203094,
0.008738987147808075,
-0.017315953969955444,
-0.0400024838745594,
0.06182553991675377,
-0.024843906983733177,
-0.011693601496517658,
0.0754668116569519,
-0.009893120266497135,
0.07403121888637543,
-0.05043476074934006,
-0.01707761362195015,
0.04304726421833038,
-0.029489655047655106,
0.027334611862897873,
0.006676681339740753,
-0.11758142709732056,
0.037391297519207,
0.033276334404945374,
-0.0005582899320870638,
0.06746595352888107,
-0.021979259327054024,
0.03427776321768761,
0.015504509210586548,
-0.06915681064128876,
-0.04835499823093414,
-0.013033801689743996,
-0.022305775433778763,
0.07061383873224258,
0.011407425627112389,
-0.047522250562906265,
-0.036362577229738235,
-0.03432079777121544,
0.08001340180635452,
-0.018156947568058968,
-0.021581098437309265,
-0.016443904489278793,
-0.04757005721330643,
0.08680041134357452,
0.02300233207643032,
0.02459087409079075,
-0.01872578263282776,
0.020228978246450424,
0.011849133297801018,
0.04852495342493057,
-0.020917240530252457,
0.054272208362817764,
0.02900359220802784,
0.03074442781507969,
0.018296055495738983,
-0.02408650703728199,
0.10290747135877609,
0.05095433071255684,
0.06442384421825409,
-0.03680143877863884,
-0.018910622224211693,
-0.024075230583548546,
-0.09372477978467941,
-0.03419559448957443,
0.023467879742383957,
0.008027653209865093,
-0.04959574714303017,
0.0007007857202552259,
-0.08152308315038681,
-0.03668662905693054,
0.04288821294903755,
-0.014754407107830048,
-0.03960694745182991,
0.0742594450712204,
-0.02710035629570484,
-0.0041932594031095505,
-0.0049247462302446365,
-3.0552628157237244e-33,
-0.028622811660170555,
0.09432276338338852,
-0.013132920488715172,
0.032341912388801575,
-0.0011956876842305064,
-0.04792766273021698,
-0.008638875558972359,
-0.09302958101034164,
-0.0015071738744154572,
-0.03603212535381317,
-0.023856205865740776,
-0.0335535891354084,
-0.017364559695124626,
0.09240159392356873,
0.017611188814044,
0.06275537610054016,
-0.012165702879428864,
0.04944605752825737,
-0.004727540072053671,
-0.043573047965765,
-0.02344861440360546,
0.061714161187410355,
-0.06110932305455208,
0.021739229559898376,
-0.044738247990608215,
-0.010236090049147606,
-0.0590214729309082,
-0.07904694229364395,
-0.001553658745251596,
-0.024335097521543503,
0.03453519567847252,
-0.020754165947437286,
0.07626480609178543,
0.0096650505438447,
-0.09076227992773056,
-0.0932382345199585,
0.024796275421977043,
0.022654958069324493,
0.03827527165412903,
-0.03515666723251343,
0.03943770378828049,
-0.0016634197672829032,
-0.0504620224237442,
0.023126890882849693,
-0.0891738161444664,
-0.026656070724129677,
0.05068172514438629,
-0.11505673080682755,
0.10934014618396759,
0.06990277022123337,
0.05576447397470474,
0.07506308704614639,
-0.03857854753732681,
0.04637504741549492,
-0.03318023309111595,
0.1032741442322731,
-0.008358594961464405,
0.07581610977649689,
-0.02791335992515087,
-0.019899733364582062,
-0.00835785735398531,
0.0952865406870842,
0.008251222781836987,
-0.030002189800143242,
0.09481174498796463,
0.03775102645158768,
0.05931231379508972,
-0.10349740833044052,
0.02206001803278923,
-0.05976657196879387,
0.014665263704955578,
-0.006032504606992006,
0.05656857043504715,
-0.034708622843027115,
-0.016927659511566162,
-0.034086406230926514,
0.047161925584077835,
-0.020487889647483826,
-0.03108777105808258,
0.02386080101132393,
0.046661682426929474,
-0.08871327340602875,
0.038764238357543945,
-0.007781908847391605,
0.0210618507117033,
0.03624242916703224,
-0.016835711896419525,
-0.045497216284275055,
-0.018017061054706573,
0.1183551773428917,
-0.08369714021682739,
-0.04553684592247009,
-0.005222843494266272,
-0.06074119359254837,
-0.011751847341656685,
-4.12034033558939e-8,
-0.08560977131128311,
0.067084401845932,
-0.07745549082756042,
0.10074745118618011,
-0.07632492482662201,
0.06588554382324219,
0.05911241099238396,
0.08608763664960861,
-0.05617152899503708,
0.07409080862998962,
-0.0455215647816658,
-0.01575731672346592,
-0.052787989377975464,
0.03590903803706169,
0.009815571829676628,
-0.0334673635661602,
-0.043441932648420334,
-0.009398235939443111,
0.00844159722328186,
-0.10433140397071838,
0.0684342086315155,
0.017733493819832802,
0.08356036245822906,
0.06404215842485428,
-0.028966868296265602,
-0.05695514380931854,
-0.002302788430824876,
0.015317208133637905,
0.10083232074975967,
-0.003965604584664106,
0.06350431591272354,
0.05380285531282425,
-0.017008980736136436,
-0.043176669627428055,
0.019090935587882996,
-0.04382801055908203,
-0.047645460814237595,
-0.020796362310647964,
-0.06812945008277893,
0.06234501674771309,
-0.01651311106979847,
0.01136862114071846,
-0.0152601832523942,
0.02365594357252121,
0.0666242241859436,
0.016979167237877846,
-0.11304441839456558,
0.06665495038032532,
0.01647120900452137,
-0.061995524913072586,
0.048378050327301025,
-0.03669185936450958,
-0.007502167951315641,
0.05377288907766342,
0.03591571003198624,
-0.0019069863483309746,
-0.0050757755525410175,
0.01746227592229843,
0.02675107680261135,
-0.027510404586791992,
-0.05408811569213867,
-0.07253551483154297,
-0.014880992472171783,
-0.06045197322964668
] | {
"pdf_file": "IL4BFU54X4UZB6DS2IJYVXCTHBOEF7YZ.pdf",
"text": "Commodity Movements Originating in West Virginia\nSummary of 1993 CFS\nIn West Virginia, the CFS measured $35 billion of goods shipments weighing 234\nmillion tons. West Virginia accounted for approximately 1 percent of the value and 2percent of the weight of total U.S. shipments. See attached table. The CFS data covershipments by establishments in mining, manufacturing, wholesale, and selected retail andservice industries. The data exclude most shipments of crude oil; therefore, the totals andpercentages do not fully reflect the contribution of pipeline shipments.\nThe major commodities shipped by establishments vary when measured by value\nand weight. The main commodities originating in West Virginia by value were:chemicals or allied products; coal; primary metal products; petroleum, or coal products;and food or kindred products. The main commodities by weight were: coal; petroleumor coal products; chemicals or allied products; nonmetallic minerals; and lumber or woodproducts, excluding furniture.\nLocal transportation of freight is important to West Virginia’s commerce. The\nCFS shows that in 1993, about one-quarter of the value and over one-third of the weightof total shipments from West Virginia were shipped to destinations within the state.About 25 percent of the value and about 41 percent of the weight of all shipments werebetween places less than 50 miles apart. In comparison, about 30 percent of the value and56 percent of the weight of total U.S. shipments were between places less than 50 milesapart. In West Virginia, about 39 percent of the value of shipments and 49 percent of theweight of shipments were between places less than 100 miles apart.\nApproximately three-quarters of the value and two-thirds of the weight of all\nshipments from West Virginia went to other states. The most important destination stateby value of shipments was Ohio. Other important states by value were: Virginia,Pennsylvania, New York, and Kentucky. Some of the most important destinations byweight of shipments were: Ohio, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and North Carolina.\nA large proportion of commodities were moved by trucks, about 65 percent of the\nvalue and 29 percent of the weight. Rail was also important, accounting for 14 percent ofthe value and 43 percent of the weight of shipments. Water transportation moved 5percent of the value of shipments and 20 percent of the weight. 1993 Commodity Flow Survey State Summary: West Virginia\nTabulation by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. Department of Transportation\nSummaryValue Weight\nTotal shipments originating in West Virginia $34.9 billion 234.2 million tons\nPercent of total U.S. shipments (preliminary U.S. estimate) 0.6 2.4\nCommodity Shipments Originating in West Virginia Ranked by Value Commodity Shipments Originating in West Virginia Ranked by Weig ht\nCommodity Percent of value Commodity Percent of weight\nChemicals or allied products ............................................. . 17.4Coal ............................................................................... . 67.6\nCoal ................................................................................... . 12.8Petroleum or coal products ............................................ 16.7\nPrimary metal products ...................................................... 12.5Chemicals or allied products ......................................... . 3.5\nPetroleum or coal products ................................................ 9.1Nonmetallic minerals ..................................................... . 3.4\nFood or kindred products ................................................... 6.6Lumber or wood products, excluding furniture .............. . 2.4\nOther commodities ............................................................ . 41.6Other commodities ........................................................ . 6.4\nTotal ................................................................................... 100.0 Total ............................................................................... 100.0\nDomestic Destinations of Shipments Originating in West Virginia Domestic Destinations of Shipments Originating in West Virginia\nRanked by Value Ranked by Weight\nState Percent of value State Percent of weight\nWest Virginia ..................................................................... . 25.4West Virginia ................................................................. . 36.3\nOhio ................................................................................... 11.8Ohio ............................................................................... 11.7\nVirginia ............................................................................... 7.5Virginia ........................................................................... 11.6\nPennsylvania ..................................................................... . 7.4Pennsylvania ................................................................. . 9.9\nNew York ........................................................................... 3.9Michigan ........................................................................ . 5.0\nKentucky ............................................................................ 3.3North Carolina ............................................................... . 3.7\nOther States ...................................................................... . 40.7Other States .................................................................. . 21.8\nTotal ................................................................................... 100.0 Total ............................................................................... 100.0\nModes of Transportation for Shipments Originating in West Virginia\nModes Percent of value Percent of weight\nParcel, U.S. Postal Service, or courier service ........................................................... ** -Truck (for-hire, private, and both private truck and for-hire truck) ..............................\n. 64.9 29.0\nAir (including truck and air) ......................................................................................... 2.0 -Rail ......................................................................................................................... ..... 14.0 43.3\nWater (inland water, Great Lakes, deep sea, truck and water, and rail and water) .... 4.9 20.1Pipeline* .................................................................................................................... .. ** **\nTruck and rail intermodal combination ........................................................................ ** 0.9Other intermodal (truck and pipeline, inland and Gt. Lakes, inland and deep sea) .... ** **Other, unknown, and withheld for sampling and disclosure reasons .......................... 14.2 6.7Total ........................................................................................................................ .... 100.0 100.0\nDomestic Distance Shipped for Commodities Originating in West Virginia\nDistance Percent of value Percent of weight\nLess than 50 miles ...................................................................................................... 25.4 4 0.6\n50 to 99 miles ............................................................................................................. . 13.1 8.5\n100 to 249 miles ......................................................................................................... . 21.0 18.1\n250 to 499 miles ......................................................................................................... . 24.5 26.7\n500 to 749 miles ......................................................................................................... . 6.5 4.5\n750 to 999 miles ......................................................................................................... . 4.0 1.2\n1,000 to 1,499 miles ................................................................................................... . 1.6 0.2\n1,500 to 1,999 miles ................................................................................................... . 0.5 -\n2,000 miles or more .................................................................................................... 3.3 0.2Total ........................................................................................................................ .... 100.0 100.0\n * CFS data for pipelines exclude most shipments of crude oil.\n** Some or all data suppressed to avoid disclosure or because data are statistically unreliable. - Represents zero or less than 1 unit of measurement.NOTE: Data are estimates based on a sample and subject to error. See Appendix B, \"Reliability of the Data,\" in source documen t.\nSOURCE: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, \n1992 Census of Transportation, Communications, and Utilities, 1993 Commodity Flow Survey , TC92-CF (Washington, DC: 1996). 90-Percent Confidence Intervals for 1993 Commodity Flow Survey State Summary: West Virginia\nTabulation by the Bureau of Transportation Statistics, U.S. Department of Transportation\nSummaryValue Weight\nTotal shipments originating in West Virginia (in billion $ and million tons) 31.17 - 38.63 203.38 - 265.02\nPercent of total U.S. shipments (preliminary U.S. estimate) 0.51 - 0.64 2.05 - 2.69\nCommodity Shipments Originating in West Virginia Ranked by Value Commodity Shipments Originating in West Virginia Ranked by Weig ht\nCommodity Percent of value Commodity Percent of weight\nChemicals or allied products ............................................... 12.3 - 22.5 Coal ................................................................................. 52.6 - 82.6\nCoal ..................................................................................... 10.4 - 15.2 Petroleum or coal products ............................................. 10.0 - 23.5\nPrimary metal products ....................................................... 9.3 - 15.7 Chemicals or allied products ........................................... 2.3 - 4.6\nPetroleum or coal products ................................................. 6.1 - 12.0 Nonmetallic minerals ....................................................... 1.5 - 5.3\nFood or kindred products .................................................... 5.2 - 8.0 Lumber or wood products, excluding furniture ................ 1.5 - 3.3\nOther commodities .............................................................. (NA)Other commodities .......................................................... (NA)\nTotal .................................................................................... (X)Total ................................................................................ (X)\nDomestic Destinations of Shipments Originating in West Virginia Domestic Destinations of Shipments Originating in West Virginia\nRanked by Value Ranked by Weight\nState Percent of value State Percent of weight\nWest Virginia ....................................................................... 22.1 - 28.7 West Virginia ................................................................... 29.9 - 42.7\nOhio .................................................................................... . 10.2 - 13.5 Ohio ................................................................................ . 9.6 - 13.8\nVirginia ................................................................................ 5.7 - 9.3 Virginia ............................................................................ 6.5 - 16.7\nPennsylvania ....................................................................... 6.1 - 8.7 Pennsylvania ................................................................... 7.4 - 12.4\nNew York ............................................................................ . 2.9 - 4.9 Michigan .......................................................................... 2.2 - 7.8\nKentucky ............................................................................. . 2.6 - 4.0 North Carolina ................................................................. 1.6 - 5.8\nOther States ........................................................................ (NA)Other States .................................................................... (NA)\nTotal .................................................................................... (X)Total ................................................................................ (X)\nModes of Transportation for Shipments Originating in West Virginia\nModes Percent of value Percent of weight\nParcel, U.S. Postal Service, or courier service ............................................................. (X) (X)Truck (for-hire, private, and both private truck and for-hire truck) ................................\n. 59.4 - 70.4 25.9 - 32.1\nAir (including truck and air) ........................................................................................... 1.2 - 2.8 (X)\nRail ......................................................................................................................... ....... 12.0 - 16.0 36.2 - 50.4\nWater (inland water, Great Lakes, deep sea, truck and water, and rail and water) ...... 3.8 - 6.0 17.4 - 22.8Pipeline* .................................................................................................................... .... (X) (X)\nTruck and rail intermodal combination .......................................................................... (X) 0.1 - 1.7Other intermodal (truck and pipeline, inland and Gt. Lakes, inland and deep sea) ...... (X) (X)Other, unknown, and withheld for sampling and disclosure reasons ............................ 13.2 - 15.2 4.7 - 8.7Total ........................................................................................................................ ...... (X) (X)\nDomestic Distance Shipped for Commodities Originating in West Virginia\nDistance Percent of value Percent of weight\nLess than 50 miles ........................................................................................................ 21. 8 - 29.0 34.4 - 46.9\n50 to 99 miles ............................................................................................................... . 7.7 - 18.5 6.0 - 11.0\n100 to 249 miles ........................................................................................................... . 17.6 - 24.5 14.7 - 21.6\n250 to 499 miles ........................................................................................................... . 22.0 - 27.0 20.5 - 33.0\n500 to 749 miles ........................................................................................................... . 4.7 - 8.3 2.0 - 7.0\n750 to 999 miles ........................................................................................................... . 3.2 - 4.8 0.7 - 1.7\n1,000 to 1,499 miles ..................................................................................................... . 0.9 - 2.3 0.0 - 0.4\n1,500 to 1,999 miles ..................................................................................................... . 0.2 - 0.8 (X)\n2,000 miles or more ...................................................................................................... 2.3 - 4.3 0.0 - 0.4\nTotal ........................................................................................................................ ...... (X) (X)\n * CFS data for pipelines exclude most shipments of crude oil.\nNA Not available. X Not applicable.NOTE: For explanation of 90-percent confidence intervals see Appendix B, \"Reliability of the Data,\" in source document.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, \n1992 Census of Transportation, Communications, and Utilities, 1993 Commodity Flow Survey , TC92-CF\n(Washington, DC: 1996). The Commodity Flow Survey (CFS) is a comprehensive effort to learn where and\nhow goods are shipped in the U.S. The CFS measures shipments of commodities byestablishments with paid employees and engaged in manufacturing, mining, wholesaletrade, or selected retail and services industries. Prior commodity surveys coveredshipments only by manufacturing firms. Commodity flows are estimated for a universe ofapproximately 900,000 establishments.\nData collected on individual shipments include total value, total weight,\ncommodity type, modes of transport, domestic origin and destination; data for exportshipments include the city and country of destination, mode and port of exit. Informationis also be obtained on whether shipments are containerized or a hazardous material. Somefirms provided data concerning on-site shipping facilities and access to shipping facilities,plus data on ownership and leasing of transportation equipment.\nThe CFS is conducted by the Bureau of the Census as part of the Economic\nCensus. Funding and technical guidance is provided by the U.S. Department ofTransportation. Initiated for 1993, the CFS is scheduled for 1997 and every 5 yearsthereafter for years ending in 2 and 7. Commodity surveys were conducted between 1963and 1982, but data for 1982 were not published. No data were collected for 1987.Participants will report for a sample of shipments during a 2-week period each quarterduring the reporting year.\nThe CFS is a mail-out/mail-back survey of 200,000 sampled employer\nestablishments in selected industries. Establishments were selected by stratified sample,with strata based on geographic location and industry. Geographic strata are the 89National Transportation Analysis Regions(NTARs), which provide nationwide coverageand are aggregations of Bureau of Economic Analysis economic areas. Within the strata,all establishments with annualized employment above a specified cutoff were selectedwith certainty, and the remaining smaller establishments were sampled with probabilityproportional to annualized payroll.\nFor 1993, each sampled establishment reported on a sample of individual\nshipments during a 2 week period in each calendar quarter. In addition, about 20,000establishments will provide information on transportation facilities and arrangements intheir final reporting period.\nFor further information about survey design and printed products, contact the\nCommodity Flow Survey Branch, Services Division, Bureau of the Census, Washington,DC 20233, or by calling 301/457-2805 or 2114. For information on related data programsand studies, contact the Bureau of Transportation Statistics at 202/366-DATA for voice,202/366-3640 for fax, or CFS@BTS.GOV for e-mail."
} |
[
0.0034292214550077915,
-0.03051687777042389,
0.0052874269895255566,
-0.04626365005970001,
0.004595229867845774,
0.0414191372692585,
-0.084540955722332,
-0.047494590282440186,
-0.07528763264417648,
0.05597104877233505,
-0.04217781499028206,
0.027420777827501297,
0.03484387695789337,
-0.014348841272294521,
0.037613093852996826,
0.05523276329040527,
0.10764659196138382,
-0.0551438145339489,
0.044434692710638046,
0.03649686649441719,
0.053299881517887115,
0.05587160587310791,
0.08619793504476547,
-0.058578670024871826,
-0.08220171183347702,
0.015118931420147419,
-0.009745164774358273,
-0.004376612603664398,
-0.11915704607963562,
-0.023130688816308975,
-0.0007416269509121776,
0.012373825535178185,
0.01706460304558277,
0.03730398789048195,
0.07334300130605698,
0.09562559425830841,
0.09393523633480072,
0.11464329063892365,
0.012902402319014072,
0.09835091233253479,
-0.07983377575874329,
-0.01880418136715889,
-0.013242450542747974,
0.07256897538900375,
0.010179043747484684,
-0.045218802988529205,
-0.0026856395415961742,
-0.061041418462991714,
0.01448146253824234,
0.1115928515791893,
-0.0182512067258358,
-0.04530438035726547,
0.04257695749402046,
0.012166367843747139,
0.0025787251070141792,
0.13102807104587555,
-0.01177193783223629,
0.007444343063980341,
-0.02893008477985859,
-0.051383353769779205,
-0.12280271202325821,
0.02851099707186222,
-0.030487561598420143,
-0.018544025719165802,
0.005025301594287157,
0.005686902441084385,
-0.0019153320463374257,
0.0380467027425766,
0.07772939652204514,
-0.1809946447610855,
-0.008830489590764046,
0.08138097822666168,
-0.028771277517080307,
0.02004929445683956,
-0.03554442524909973,
0.08662910759449005,
0.07054140418767929,
0.08089279383420944,
0.14287661015987396,
-0.053934190422296524,
-0.0012905776966363192,
0.0013806619681417942,
-0.0441940538585186,
-0.025659464299678802,
0.033287156373262405,
-0.009449917823076248,
-0.08755363523960114,
0.011333157308399677,
0.03873465955257416,
0.030049819499254227,
0.009370915591716766,
-0.04239035025238991,
-0.012219447642564774,
0.03214588016271591,
0.05060074105858803,
0.025815196335315704,
-0.005050039384514093,
0.017163408920168877,
0.011611594818532467,
0.02309643104672432,
0.01663222350180149,
-0.06649330258369446,
-0.0785258412361145,
-0.03805691376328468,
-0.058506615459918976,
-0.02564891241490841,
0.08342532068490982,
-0.01847931556403637,
-0.02516390196979046,
-0.06410311907529831,
0.03209467977285385,
0.038180746138095856,
-0.012606398202478886,
-0.0315510518848896,
-0.01847226358950138,
0.10474007576704025,
-0.0015285216504707932,
0.003735813545063138,
0.018681205809116364,
-0.012452044524252415,
-0.05561520531773567,
-0.0161675363779068,
0.027114659547805786,
-0.057400695979595184,
0.0011578906560316682,
-0.04752294346690178,
0.02983933500945568,
7.6606512257382495e-34,
-0.003180400701239705,
-0.024141574278473854,
0.020986998453736305,
0.029949771240353584,
0.024605605751276016,
-0.04263628274202347,
0.06975272297859192,
-0.02688993141055107,
-0.01623387262225151,
0.07226880639791489,
-0.07360634207725525,
0.06384909898042679,
0.03359745070338249,
0.01616095006465912,
-0.08986754715442657,
-0.01987449824810028,
-0.07667121291160583,
0.002296352991834283,
-0.09602269530296326,
-0.021117759868502617,
0.013882330618798733,
-0.03143799304962158,
-0.037852995097637177,
0.023928076028823853,
0.09862346947193146,
0.025085153058171272,
-0.024735385552048683,
0.08280114829540253,
0.11153681576251984,
0.02829456701874733,
-0.048458658158779144,
-0.031100770458579063,
-0.05803316831588745,
0.0038169880863279104,
0.09897595643997192,
0.016881713643670082,
0.004798992071300745,
0.019245358183979988,
-0.035175371915102005,
-0.11682047694921494,
0.033200282603502274,
0.024305272847414017,
0.005486021284013987,
0.04760359227657318,
0.03142653405666351,
0.012048318050801754,
0.0045038918033242226,
-0.0396699383854866,
0.05739046633243561,
-0.015972111374139786,
0.019933320581912994,
-0.017404893413186073,
-0.06996512413024902,
-0.02286403626203537,
-0.03507772460579872,
-0.008309883065521717,
0.04141708463430405,
0.023946285247802734,
0.0062614548951387405,
-0.04396507889032364,
-0.048525914549827576,
0.0356595516204834,
-0.02826358750462532,
0.04975782707333565,
-0.05658141151070595,
-0.07528495043516159,
-0.09196049720048904,
-0.058487992733716965,
0.1512499451637268,
-0.052122604101896286,
0.0705195963382721,
-0.020543670281767845,
-0.008258389309048653,
-0.05215530842542648,
0.019778631627559662,
0.008267480880022049,
0.00912450160831213,
-0.013339783996343613,
0.02648337185382843,
0.01285539474338293,
0.010420027188956738,
-0.03107578493654728,
-0.02426743321120739,
0.03663185238838196,
0.05157868564128876,
-0.05498930811882019,
0.0054252236150205135,
-0.10102014988660812,
0.02153635211288929,
-0.01232751365751028,
-0.02219519019126892,
0.026690833270549774,
-0.05306847393512726,
0.062270376831293106,
0.001418839325197041,
-3.249094671005619e-33,
0.06024295464158058,
0.009861541911959648,
-0.03147014230489731,
0.013240979984402657,
0.006080185994505882,
0.01034903060644865,
0.053834766149520874,
-0.014238427393138409,
-0.009615837596356869,
-0.08661501854658127,
-0.014778203330934048,
0.0463065467774868,
-0.05094195902347565,
0.021419009193778038,
-0.012826346792280674,
0.02181093394756317,
0.03182315453886986,
0.08349976688623428,
0.008299916982650757,
-0.05214789882302284,
0.10676734149456024,
0.0018970719538629055,
-0.00452759163454175,
-0.06372511386871338,
-0.004429523833096027,
-0.07698194682598114,
0.05821427330374718,
0.07655391842126846,
0.029438503086566925,
0.07151611149311066,
-0.0015723009128123522,
-0.017068011686205864,
-0.049148935824632645,
0.10628890991210938,
-0.011599414981901646,
-0.0001582283148309216,
0.067539282143116,
0.0004145014099776745,
-0.09367230534553528,
0.02862825058400631,
0.049829404801130295,
-0.11125975102186203,
-0.06873185932636261,
0.007454342674463987,
-0.04870529845356941,
-0.02990727126598358,
-0.030563337728381157,
-0.007268451154232025,
-0.02674153819680214,
0.06365825980901718,
-0.07838575541973114,
-0.01718711480498314,
-0.007984847761690617,
0.006742449011653662,
0.06632838398218155,
0.05080042779445648,
0.006054630968719721,
-0.039300888776779175,
0.06353973597288132,
0.06836190819740295,
0.03785798326134682,
0.06919251382350922,
-0.06904621422290802,
-0.04306429997086525,
0.04463421180844307,
-0.033647749572992325,
0.0068021612241864204,
0.07022492587566376,
-0.04574330896139145,
0.0749334841966629,
0.0481518879532814,
-0.019535325467586517,
0.05057084560394287,
-0.04979933798313141,
-0.06691081821918488,
-0.00094642024487257,
0.024638110771775246,
0.008068990893661976,
-0.0614248588681221,
-0.016441013664007187,
0.04670633003115654,
-0.046381428837776184,
-0.03766432777047157,
0.021145369857549667,
-0.09933337569236755,
0.06675508618354797,
0.1433010995388031,
0.03761370852589607,
-0.039820387959480286,
0.01885661855340004,
-0.03609948232769966,
-0.08308758586645126,
-0.03192196413874626,
-0.025338545441627502,
-0.05948421731591225,
-5.326708318875717e-8,
0.007318869698792696,
0.09011247009038925,
-0.021088242530822754,
0.07160840183496475,
0.004128860309720039,
-0.005815349984914064,
-0.052267007529735565,
0.00018513643590267748,
0.06001151725649834,
-0.0016626976430416107,
0.08081591129302979,
0.005965722259134054,
-0.030532531440258026,
-0.05261263996362686,
0.046129174530506134,
-0.009134023450314999,
-0.0851752758026123,
-0.04426248371601105,
-0.04935105890035629,
-0.07699649780988693,
-0.03407052159309387,
0.008019162341952324,
-0.017267046496272087,
0.05723826214671135,
-0.0033464664593338966,
0.040768906474113464,
-0.08153653144836426,
0.025576580315828323,
0.014593646861612797,
0.05617424100637436,
-0.015048864297568798,
0.0819951593875885,
-0.03619309514760971,
-0.03659527748823166,
-0.01199278887361288,
-0.0009938380680978298,
-0.09627043455839157,
-0.060838352888822556,
0.050514135509729385,
-0.03566661849617958,
-0.10326238721609116,
-0.051334746181964874,
0.027049114927649498,
-0.028996959328651428,
0.051673296838998795,
0.0002987164189107716,
-0.02883210778236389,
-0.05483080446720123,
0.04750308021903038,
-0.04183623194694519,
-0.05454103276133537,
-0.02722548507153988,
-0.0245113093405962,
-0.02761928178369999,
0.0006961721228435636,
0.08466017991304398,
0.0012135764118283987,
-0.022862976416945457,
-0.028580935671925545,
-0.003404076211154461,
0.005231683142483234,
-0.016162047162652016,
-0.08443310856819153,
0.01986679807305336
] | {
"pdf_file": "TV2FR5ZDVPUTCZABFDGX5523SXF5WWIR.pdf",
"text": "September 20, 2010: Wittman to Host Military Academy Informational Meeting in Yorktown\nWashington, DC – On Saturday, September 25, 2010, the office of Congressman Rob Wittman\n(VA-1) will host a Service Academy Informational Meeting for high school students at Grafton\nHigh School in Yorktown, Virginia. Representatives from the service academies will be in\nattendance to provide specific information on their respective academies. Students, parents and\nschool officials are invited to attend to learn more about each academy and about the academy\nnomination process.\n \n \n \nWHO: Office of Congressman Rob Wittman (VA-01), Representatives from: U.S. Coast Guard\nAcademy, Merchant Marine Academy, U.S. Air Force Academy, U.S. Naval Academy, and the\nU.S. Military Academy\n \n \n \nWHAT: An informational meeting for students to learn more about the opportunity to apply to\nservice academies, and more about the service academy nomination process.\n \n \n \nWHEN: Saturday, September 25, 2010, 9:00 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. \n \n \n \nWHERE: Grafton High School, 403 Grafton Drive, Yorktown, Virginia 23692\n \n 1 / 2 September 20, 2010: Wittman to Host Military Academy Informational Meeting in Yorktown\n \n \nBACKGROUND\n \n As the First District Representative in the U.S. House, Congressman Wittman is allowed to\nnominate a limited number of candidates to four of the five service academies. The honor of\nattending a service academy comes with an obligation and commitment to serve in the military\nfor a minimum of five years upon graduation. Applicants must meet the basic requirements of\nthe academies, and eligibility requirements established by law. For more information, visit htt\np://wittman.house.gov\n.\n \nCongressman Rob Wittman represents the First District of Virginia. He serves on the Natural\nResources Committee and the Armed Services Committee where he is the Ranking Member of\nthe Oversight and Investigations Subcommittee.\n \n 2 / 2"
} |
[
-0.023331044241786003,
-0.09063182026147842,
-0.046792659908533096,
-0.030216600745916367,
-0.05666499212384224,
0.0793212428689003,
-0.005327485501766205,
-0.014561289921402931,
0.0008502585696987808,
0.041692327708005905,
-0.0034368603955954313,
0.013018160127103329,
0.04424508661031723,
0.015547805465757847,
-0.031230168417096138,
0.009643967263400555,
0.06813281774520874,
-0.018133090808987617,
0.03613723814487457,
0.06366219371557236,
0.011258593760430813,
0.09028328210115433,
0.08757334202528,
-0.057878654450178146,
0.07528841495513916,
0.019109100103378296,
-0.07327347248792648,
0.01226334273815155,
-0.0002822754322551191,
0.08339673280715942,
0.11918149143457413,
-0.04679884761571884,
-0.021484052762389183,
-0.020985597744584084,
0.12226006388664246,
0.03835505247116089,
-0.0231802836060524,
0.0483710803091526,
-0.02008982002735138,
0.031596168875694275,
-0.04097781330347061,
-0.018128592520952225,
-0.011832276359200478,
0.08730216324329376,
-0.059072598814964294,
0.01977364718914032,
-0.10566617548465729,
-0.000017452710380894132,
-0.0036431620828807354,
0.011793205514550209,
-0.0046406337060034275,
-0.059725355356931686,
0.028719188645482063,
0.10568230599164963,
0.026392191648483276,
0.0042887162417173386,
0.03971731290221214,
-0.05299583077430725,
-0.04458335041999817,
-0.0007475239690393209,
0.00755688501521945,
0.002078209538012743,
0.047809213399887085,
-0.010008841753005981,
-0.008183128200471401,
0.0315413773059845,
-0.08250679820775986,
-0.0034523513168096542,
0.09052775055170059,
-0.10435154289007187,
0.047527797520160675,
-0.024313760921359062,
-0.008621202781796455,
0.023589666932821274,
0.0703488439321518,
-0.03551135212182999,
-0.0030132189858704805,
0.02631213329732418,
0.09726683795452118,
-0.036608289927244186,
-0.0734354704618454,
-0.006593555212020874,
0.0781935527920723,
0.10785029083490372,
-0.005928309168666601,
-0.03185390308499336,
-0.006781238131225109,
0.027378901839256287,
0.018916631117463112,
-0.05009842291474342,
0.054334886372089386,
0.018817387521266937,
-0.05418366566300392,
-0.08016400784254074,
0.019875600934028625,
-0.05754746496677399,
-0.008926921524107456,
-0.02942267246544361,
-0.06961122155189514,
0.021082358434796333,
-0.06410042196512222,
-0.05513029173016548,
-0.018977375701069832,
-0.01728057488799095,
0.04466261342167854,
-0.09300877898931503,
0.034193914383649826,
0.041563328355550766,
-0.018909238278865814,
-0.019047169014811516,
0.018644757568836212,
0.0007758823339827359,
0.009218322113156319,
0.07631528377532959,
0.007536739110946655,
0.05581391975283623,
0.05016167089343071,
0.004768094047904015,
0.04530264809727669,
-0.00982031412422657,
-0.05391036346554756,
0.004076611716300249,
-0.026812568306922913,
-0.002405439969152212,
0.08141204714775085,
0.035179439932107925,
0.03889717161655426,
9.946848056297942e-33,
0.05150362104177475,
0.0663817822933197,
0.02415161393582821,
-0.010200034826993942,
0.07853313535451889,
-0.024004315957427025,
0.011908437125384808,
-0.02542106807231903,
0.05109885707497597,
0.014712831005454063,
-0.055112048983573914,
-0.023395048454403877,
-0.0411965474486351,
-0.09757304936647415,
-0.05072963610291481,
-0.04400210082530975,
-0.029012709856033325,
0.006983889266848564,
-0.017929645255208015,
0.0558791309595108,
0.0409817099571228,
-0.05926242470741272,
0.01078422088176012,
0.04274231567978859,
-0.09914000332355499,
-0.02356952801346779,
0.048973292112350464,
0.05483994632959366,
0.05579030141234398,
0.016177622601389885,
-0.0011080395197495818,
-0.011333426460623741,
-0.0022887354716658592,
-0.07669589668512344,
-0.0239458829164505,
-0.0038562866393476725,
0.017854902893304825,
0.0005774129531346262,
-0.041891854256391525,
-0.04997803270816803,
-0.029760822653770447,
-0.021845709532499313,
0.007771899923682213,
0.07499402016401291,
0.07156171649694443,
-0.010704485699534416,
0.03975282236933708,
-0.04260149225592613,
0.004030162934213877,
0.04509255662560463,
-0.05322730541229248,
0.05909479781985283,
-0.04809447005391121,
0.06146911531686783,
-0.08684416115283966,
-0.002816443797200918,
0.030160484835505486,
-0.013323933817446232,
0.06631594896316528,
0.006042939610779285,
0.013333519920706749,
-0.04167444631457329,
-0.0327921062707901,
-0.057746101170778275,
0.07076644897460938,
-0.08951914310455322,
0.08300364762544632,
-0.08028224110603333,
0.007098729256540537,
0.009557841345667839,
0.024097105488181114,
-0.09436285495758057,
0.028474319726228714,
0.04888227581977844,
-0.032738976180553436,
0.030814429745078087,
-0.031009651720523834,
0.06546229869127274,
-0.015904569998383522,
-0.07306846976280212,
0.005846072919666767,
0.02297508902847767,
-0.0589156299829483,
0.04223727434873581,
0.06885742396116257,
-0.10000518709421158,
0.002434029709547758,
-0.028889566659927368,
-0.12610626220703125,
-0.03629516065120697,
0.023930108174681664,
0.029520221054553986,
-0.019430996850132942,
0.00777850765734911,
-0.07607641071081161,
-9.701976419974336e-33,
-0.06049729511141777,
-0.06986849009990692,
-0.03178391978144646,
-0.024011816829442978,
-0.035985399037599564,
-0.03919282183051109,
-0.009244781918823719,
-0.026806263253092766,
0.09459786117076874,
-0.004410532768815756,
0.027356982231140137,
-0.05196714401245117,
-0.03603774681687355,
0.019627362489700317,
-0.02523726597428322,
0.05405619740486145,
-0.06359560042619705,
-0.0244405847042799,
-0.004399219993501902,
0.023474182933568954,
0.06172674521803856,
0.06308792531490326,
-0.03825649619102478,
0.053919821977615356,
-0.007590434513986111,
0.09684565663337708,
-0.017276527360081673,
0.11264552175998688,
0.02096463367342949,
-0.041871313005685806,
-0.003959829453378916,
-0.08676446974277496,
-0.021465538069605827,
0.012684294953942299,
-0.05714762583374977,
-0.06175484508275986,
0.03447004407644272,
0.01492766197770834,
-0.10521858185529709,
-0.024276571348309517,
0.1596400886774063,
-0.06820786744356155,
-0.03348423168063164,
0.07966003566980362,
0.08032885193824768,
-0.10838758945465088,
-0.09780159592628479,
-0.07298323512077332,
0.02967091277241707,
0.03208078816533089,
-0.01008845865726471,
0.035776205360889435,
-0.015657154843211174,
0.0813429206609726,
-0.007439191918820143,
0.004115656483918428,
0.02294459007680416,
-0.042489465326070786,
-0.12637990713119507,
-0.0652230903506279,
0.0757765844464302,
0.07134313136339188,
-0.08240282535552979,
0.07557182759046555,
0.06853780895471573,
-0.09630455076694489,
-0.05411753058433533,
-0.10062307864427567,
0.01028368715196848,
-0.06153445318341255,
-0.11302222311496735,
-0.056585997343063354,
0.01809030771255493,
-0.09100860357284546,
0.06113433837890625,
0.0014830126892775297,
0.0455607995390892,
0.0031775357201695442,
-0.04628486558794975,
-0.019552620127797127,
-0.03150858357548714,
-0.0034659516531974077,
0.053696662187576294,
0.0007313013775274158,
-0.02023441344499588,
0.007236627861857414,
0.14788176119327545,
0.003253344912081957,
-0.04813222959637642,
0.010199830867350101,
-0.014519298449158669,
0.019180063158273697,
-0.05507766827940941,
0.0264433603733778,
-0.060343917459249496,
-6.08620212005917e-8,
0.005465337075293064,
0.08102481812238693,
0.026675419881939888,
-0.033351875841617584,
0.012664113193750381,
-0.10263620316982269,
0.01921977289021015,
0.028304386883974075,
-0.04287560656666756,
0.06485764682292938,
0.003362643765285611,
0.06636925786733627,
-0.04469841346144676,
-0.0468028299510479,
0.023911941796541214,
-0.015175235457718372,
-0.06752040237188339,
0.020454440265893936,
-0.02970525063574314,
-0.014140930026769638,
-0.04616415873169899,
-0.021755071356892586,
0.04862132668495178,
-0.015234889462590218,
-0.04583254083991051,
0.018286896869540215,
-0.024226205423474312,
0.016565507277846336,
0.012046079151332378,
-0.006790598388761282,
-0.0062764426693320274,
0.007994753308594227,
0.05884033441543579,
0.03935496509075165,
-0.0383172370493412,
-0.013947531580924988,
-0.028815649449825287,
-0.01961950771510601,
0.051979921758174896,
0.05471782013773918,
-0.09867524355649948,
-0.05558984354138374,
-0.01864122971892357,
0.01337043009698391,
0.003558394266292453,
0.04699678719043732,
-0.009181256406009197,
-0.005055617541074753,
0.09358876198530197,
0.011159625835716724,
0.0037782450672239065,
-0.07712876796722412,
0.024062134325504303,
-0.09461227059364319,
-0.07966700196266174,
0.0857299342751503,
-0.019668158143758774,
-0.03589502349495888,
0.009391579777002335,
0.07910899817943573,
0.04729586839675903,
-0.057246822863817215,
0.03600360453128815,
-0.015825441107153893
] | {
"pdf_file": "IM4QZDPPO5PUG5SPN2VFLKQDDK5RT3BU.pdf",
"text": "Department of Health ServicesSTATE OF WISCONSINDIRECTORY OF LICENSED WISCONSIN NURSING HOMES - ALPHABETICAL BY COUNTY AND CITY\nKEY TO DESCRIPTIONS:\nTitle 18 = Title XVIII, Medicare CertificationTitle 19 = Title XIX, Medicaid CertifcationIMD = Institute for Mental Diseases\nSNF = Skilled Nursing FacilityNF = Nursing Facility Tuesday, November 17, 2009DIVISION OF QUALITY ASSURANCE\nPO Box 2969\nMadison, WI 53701-2969\nPROVIDER/ADDRESSCounty: MARATHON\nContact and Phones DQA RegionCounty\nLevel and BedsLicense Number, \nTypes, Provider NumberOwner, Ownership, Certification\nGOLDEN LIVINGCENTER-CONTINENTAL MANOR\n600 E ELM ST(715) 223-2359\nFAX: (715) 223-6539\nAdministrator: CATHY WITTMARATHON\nNorthernLic. 2874\nSKILLED CARE78 BedsGGNSC ABBOTSFORD LLC\n525435\nTitle 18 SNF Title 19 NF ABBOTSFORD, WI 54405\nKENNEDY PARK MEDICAL AND REHABILITATION\n6001 ALDERSON ST(715) 359-4257\nFAX: (715) 355-7802\nAdministrator: JAMES TORGERSON, SRMARATHON\nNorthernLic. 3237\nSKILLED CARE\n148 BedsKINDRED NURSING CENTERS LIMITED \nPARTNERSHIP\n525420 Title 18 SNF Title 19 NF SCHOFIELD, WI 54476FOR PROFIT PARTNERSHIP\nCOLONIAL MANOR MEDICAL AND REHABILITATION \nCENTER\n1010 E WAUSAU AVE(715) 842-2028\nFAX: (715) 845-5810\nAdministrator: ERICCA YLITALOMARATHON\nNorthernLic. 3234\nSKILLED CARE\n150 BedsKINDRED NURSING CENTERS LIMITED \nPARTNERSHIP\n525405 Title 18 SNF Title 19 NF WAUSAU, WI 54403FOR PROFIT PARTNERSHIP\nMARYWOOD CONVALESCENT CENTER\n1821 N 4TH AVE(715) 675-9451\nFAX: (715) 675-4051\nAdministrator: JERRY FRESEMARATHON\nNorthernLic. 2674\nSKILLED CARE90 BedsCATHOLIC RESIDENTIAL SERVICES INC\n525503\nTitle 18 SNF Title 19 NF WAUSAU, WI 54401NONPROFIT CHURCH/CORP\nNORTH CENTRAL HEALTH CARE\n1100 LAKE VIEW DR(715) 848-4402\nFAX: (715) 848-2362\nAdministrator: LORI KOEPPELMARATHON\nNorthernLic. 2931\nSKILLED CARE\n280 BedsNORTH CENTRAL HEALTH CARE \nFACILITIES\n525132 Title 18 SNF Title 19 NF WAUSAU, WI 54403GOVERNMENT COUNTY\nWAUSAU MANOR\n3107 WESTHILL DR(715) 842-0575\nFAX: (715) 842-0577\nAdministrator: MARIA LOWMARATHON\nNorthernLic. 2890\nSKILLED CARE60 BedsEHF WAUSAU SNF OP, LLC\n525369\nTitle 18 SNF Title 19 NF WAUSAU, WI 54401\nRENNES HEALTH AND REHAB CENTER-WESTON\n4605 VALDRES SPRINGS CT(715) 393-0400\nFAX: (715) 355-6161\nAdministrator: PETER LEERMARATHON\nNorthernLic. 5030\nSKILLED CARE\n34 BedsTDR INC\n525699 Title 18 SNF Title 19 NF WESTON, WI 54476FOR PROFIT PARTNERSHIP"
} |
[
-0.05411718413233757,
-0.005080096423625946,
0.008579837158322334,
-0.024069247767329216,
-0.14982375502586365,
-0.01319084595888853,
-0.014627373777329922,
-0.013947596773505211,
0.010034325532615185,
-0.03790029510855675,
-0.05602394789457321,
0.03188636526465416,
0.046254027634859085,
-0.07696559280157089,
-0.05251576751470566,
-0.013356925919651985,
0.00543258897960186,
-0.08229848742485046,
-0.019080502912402153,
0.11416655778884888,
0.07132025063037872,
0.1189923882484436,
-0.06604690849781036,
0.0264483280479908,
0.04238187521696091,
-0.00994519516825676,
-0.017299730330705643,
0.017593588680028915,
0.002868383191525936,
0.08619260787963867,
0.08621510863304138,
-0.0216852854937315,
0.01554044708609581,
-0.034967295825481415,
0.056787557899951935,
0.01689068414270878,
-0.02186337113380432,
0.006467688828706741,
-0.06643547862768173,
0.0870462954044342,
0.015180676244199276,
-0.024914462119340897,
-0.0011680432362481952,
0.12431743741035461,
0.03315608948469162,
-0.038249075412750244,
-0.059945765882730484,
0.0519530288875103,
-0.07392721623182297,
0.048224277794361115,
-0.03491733595728874,
-0.06688171625137329,
-0.0006064762710593641,
0.09572875499725342,
-0.05124487355351448,
-0.01669989712536335,
0.028836868703365326,
0.00008195250848075375,
-0.06842084974050522,
0.035071201622486115,
0.024928618222475052,
0.02078794315457344,
0.0014041929971426725,
0.032628390938043594,
-0.0399053730070591,
0.054178375750780106,
-0.026433495804667473,
-0.11981463432312012,
-0.028892163187265396,
-0.06300152838230133,
-0.04664535075426102,
-0.10420363396406174,
0.0818299949169159,
0.1632683277130127,
0.10985854268074036,
-0.07820084691047668,
0.011678878217935562,
0.010246667079627514,
0.01583567075431347,
-0.07124781608581543,
-0.02064855955541134,
0.02014421485364437,
-0.09037729352712631,
-0.0054588899947702885,
-0.0037601671647280455,
-0.02416384406387806,
0.0007121816161088645,
0.0626700296998024,
0.06565967947244644,
-0.06083230301737785,
0.0892520546913147,
-0.011225300841033459,
-0.03144965320825577,
-0.10383780300617218,
0.11819770932197571,
0.01384029071778059,
-0.02932664379477501,
-0.07594840973615646,
0.009309533052146435,
-0.0003203914675395936,
-0.05826171860098839,
-0.049938566982746124,
-0.06138075143098831,
0.043592214584350586,
-0.008825371041893959,
-0.009835967794060707,
0.014826107770204544,
-0.0021520794834941626,
-0.04480893164873123,
0.03138731047511101,
0.06507079303264618,
0.01576683670282364,
0.02317989431321621,
0.01620611920952797,
-0.027349134907126427,
0.06526364386081696,
-0.060309868305921555,
-0.00306418864056468,
0.08926442265510559,
-0.003736999351531267,
-0.10878278315067291,
-0.025914274156093597,
-0.039445508271455765,
-0.08798644691705704,
0.09535335749387741,
-0.005759044550359249,
-0.04548303410410881,
1.166708724411341e-33,
0.04078926518559456,
0.020481664687395096,
-0.002829078584909439,
-0.003252522088587284,
0.013507596217095852,
0.0773380920290947,
-0.009269245900213718,
-0.026342153549194336,
-0.01444009505212307,
-0.04461169242858887,
-0.059604715555906296,
0.07601237297058105,
0.050844695419073105,
-0.0028012471739202738,
-0.028588367626070976,
0.07828565686941147,
-0.01858394779264927,
0.06767912209033966,
-0.014963670633733273,
0.07332952320575714,
0.03243546187877655,
-0.0563468374311924,
-0.047479841858148575,
0.06232619658112526,
-0.08242073655128479,
0.08790069073438644,
-0.03961612656712532,
-0.009071762673556805,
0.09078484028577805,
-0.0037363048177212477,
0.01862097717821598,
-0.06900571286678314,
-0.012502799741923809,
-0.1208135113120079,
0.041590698063373566,
0.008875256404280663,
-0.04439777508378029,
0.02401127852499485,
-0.02911277860403061,
-0.05749763920903206,
-0.014112397097051144,
0.043677374720573425,
0.0746784433722496,
0.1014048382639885,
0.010550170205533504,
-0.0201556459069252,
0.010483556427061558,
-0.01275089755654335,
0.0072971670888364315,
0.006756004877388477,
0.030360786244273186,
-0.053314462304115295,
-0.015374804846942425,
-0.03605347126722336,
-0.03694388270378113,
0.007392617408186197,
-0.009577636606991291,
0.019077830016613007,
0.018860911950469017,
-0.004567014053463936,
0.0649351254105568,
0.00753629207611084,
0.03576892614364624,
-0.04035870358347893,
-0.013514594174921513,
-0.06500779092311859,
0.004057835787534714,
-0.08665766566991806,
0.09253346920013428,
-0.04318920895457268,
-0.011793314479291439,
-0.0006690611480735242,
-0.07851006835699081,
0.08543580025434494,
-0.04987858608365059,
-0.0017837686464190483,
0.03258149325847626,
-0.011666073463857174,
-0.002103808568790555,
0.006756314542144537,
0.011805800721049309,
-0.03090646117925644,
-0.01261266227811575,
0.02812553569674492,
0.01960405521094799,
-0.04927899315953255,
-0.028758294880390167,
0.06261992454528809,
0.0015799787361174822,
-0.05150871351361275,
0.034525055438280106,
0.0316462367773056,
-0.005103274714201689,
-0.0029583678115159273,
0.06759090721607208,
-3.248928265086581e-33,
0.03475596755743027,
0.016352342441678047,
-0.00949192326515913,
-0.010135160759091377,
-0.004730366636067629,
-0.054410118609666824,
0.028456803411245346,
-0.04809143766760826,
0.07434705644845963,
-0.08581485599279404,
0.035619355738162994,
0.03797371685504913,
-0.006550424266606569,
-0.0858883261680603,
-0.03451446443796158,
0.016002843156456947,
-0.08711596578359604,
-0.012077679857611656,
0.003037393558770418,
0.019630787894129753,
0.009336873888969421,
0.01020385604351759,
0.0730774775147438,
0.05384213104844093,
0.048058852553367615,
-0.03499700874090195,
-0.02908817119896412,
0.0765853151679039,
-0.005759696010500193,
-0.048550669103860855,
0.03798949718475342,
-0.027215110138058662,
-0.07432657480239868,
-0.013497216627001762,
-0.1413407176733017,
-0.0010625652503222227,
-0.025611193850636482,
0.00798095017671585,
-0.036493007093667984,
0.023725779727101326,
0.16559608280658722,
-0.05020543187856674,
0.005029639229178429,
0.06554119288921356,
-0.01934860646724701,
-0.01277702022343874,
0.026898253709077835,
0.007224581204354763,
0.010600815527141094,
-0.03212942183017731,
-0.019724292680621147,
-0.03732812777161598,
0.06561669707298279,
-0.0006246424745768309,
0.054884787648916245,
0.021232062950730324,
-0.04570311680436134,
-0.06479200720787048,
-0.030851807445287704,
-0.053961534053087234,
0.11634249240159988,
0.019001401960849762,
0.030472835525870323,
0.043143630027770996,
-0.038059283047914505,
-0.007987964898347855,
0.004081242717802525,
-0.012289853766560555,
-0.0012467694468796253,
0.06157073378562927,
-0.045094046741724014,
-0.054640937596559525,
-0.050311967730522156,
-0.09950120747089386,
0.01261079404503107,
0.038394201546907425,
0.0076244003139436245,
-0.008847438730299473,
-0.06349781900644302,
-0.009949286468327045,
-0.04155469685792923,
-0.04629005119204521,
0.016716368496418,
0.09420648217201233,
-0.05227116495370865,
-0.023771848529577255,
0.07002534717321396,
-0.05706019699573517,
-0.02338341251015663,
0.08854842185974121,
-0.05764245614409447,
0.00439614849165082,
-0.012919798493385315,
0.022521989420056343,
-0.04635193198919296,
-4.831043654007772e-8,
-0.008371762931346893,
0.06715609133243561,
0.005881236866116524,
-0.033622391521930695,
0.07021613419055939,
-0.07048356533050537,
-0.05018945038318634,
-0.02380875125527382,
0.07479683309793472,
0.00259340344928205,
-0.023805782198905945,
-0.05779712274670601,
0.032399557530879974,
-0.062453482300043106,
0.09978285431861877,
0.1382940113544464,
0.02158280462026596,
0.00944935530424118,
-0.05285528302192688,
0.06857012957334518,
-0.024938344955444336,
-0.06847555190324783,
0.012039958499372005,
0.048367731273174286,
0.03679440915584564,
0.0628044530749321,
-0.06503857672214508,
0.03109162300825119,
0.05240962281823158,
0.09726614505052567,
0.023303302004933357,
-0.0319398008286953,
0.06193653121590614,
-0.04341074824333191,
-0.026334885507822037,
-0.061492059379816055,
-0.004649273119866848,
-0.03797601908445358,
0.023025764152407646,
0.001770667266100645,
0.011127583682537079,
-0.0025542040821164846,
0.030480485409498215,
0.01819823868572712,
0.0028391126543283463,
0.018837759271264076,
-0.02362443506717682,
0.010909922420978546,
-0.0008140784339047968,
0.02042621187865734,
0.05089159682393074,
-0.102591872215271,
0.03772354498505592,
-0.04508979618549347,
-0.08403636515140533,
0.015213826671242714,
0.031923383474349976,
-0.05245620757341385,
-0.011651136912405491,
0.018760545179247856,
-0.013720224611461163,
0.07334663718938828,
0.10134446620941162,
-0.011308320797979832
] | {
"pdf_file": "C4C7ZVBASMN3KJOSFYD7Z6OSJZ2VL6SO.pdf",
"text": "28 \n October 2005 28-1 28 Physician \nPhysician's services, whether furnished in the office, the recipient's home, \na hospital, a skilled nursing facility, or elsewhere, refer to services provided \nby a physician: \n• Within the scope of practice of medicine or osteopathy as defined by \nstate law; and \n• By or under the personal supervision of an individual licensed under \nstate law to practice medicine of osteopathy. \nThe policy provisions for physicians can be found in the Alabama Medicaid \nAgency Administrative Code, Chapter 6. \n28.1 Enrollment \nEDS enrolls physicians and issues provider contracts to applicants who \nmeet the licensure and/or certific ation requirements of the state of \nAlabama, the Code of Federal Regulations, the Alabama Medicaid Agency \nAdministrative Code , and the Alabama Medicaid Provider Manual . For the \npurpose of enrollment, a physician is defined as: a physician who is fully licensed and possesses a current license to practice medicine. \nEDS also enrolls Physician Assistant s (PA), Certified Registered Nurse \nPractitioners (CRNP), Certified Regi stered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNA), \nand Anesthesiology Assistants (AA) who are employed by a Medicaid \nenrolled physician. Physician-employed includes physicians practicing in \nan independent practice or in a group practice relationship. \nRefer to Chapter 38, Anesthesiology, for more information on CRNA and \nAA services. \nRefer to Chapter 2, Becoming a Medicaid Provider, for general enrollment \ninstructions and information. Failure to provide accurate and truthful \ninformation or intentional misrepres entation might result in action ranging \nfrom denial of application to permanent exclusion. \nProvider Number, Type, and Specialty \nA provider who contracts with Medicaid as a physician is issued a nine-digit \nAlabama Medicaid provider number that enables the provider to submit \nclaims and receive reimbursement for physician-related claims. \nNOTE : \nAll nine digits are required when filing a claim. \nPhysicians are assigned a provider type of 01 (Physician). Physician-Employed Nurse Practitioners or Physic ian-Employed Physician Assistants \nare assigned a provider type of 06 (P hysician-Employed Practitioners), and \nCertified Registered Nurse Anesthetis ts and Anesthesiology Assistants are \nassigned a provider type of 92 (CRNA). \nPhysician \n28-2 October 2005 Valid specialties for physicians and physician-employed practitioners are \nlisted below: \nSpecialty Code \nAllergy/Immunology 03 \nAnesthesiology 05 \nAnesthesiology Assistant N7 \nCardiac surgery S1 \nCardiovascular disease 06 \nCertified Registered Nurse Anesthetist C3 \nCochlear implant team C9 \nColon and rectal surgery S2 \nDermatology 07 \nEENT XA \nEmergency medicine E1 \nEndocrinology E2 \nEPSDT E3 \nFamily practice 08 \nGastroenterology 10 \nGeneral practice 01 \nGeneral surgery 02 \nGeriatrics 38 \nHand surgery 21 \nHematology H2 \nInfectious diseases 55 \nInternal medicine 11 \nMammography M7 \nNeonatology N1 \nNephrology 39 \nNeurological surgery 14 \nNeurology 13 \nNuclear medicine 36 \nNutrition 40 \nObstetrics/Gynecology 16 \nOncology XI \nOphthalmology 18 \nOral and maxillofacial surgery SE \nOrthopedic X6 \nOrthopedic surgery 20 \nOtorhinolaryngology X9 \nPathology 22 \nPediatrics 37 \nPhysician-Employed Nurse Practitioner N3 \nPhysician-Employed Physician Assistant N6 \nPlastic, reconstructive , cosmetic surgery 24 \nPrimary care provider ( not a screening provider \nbut can refer patients) AE \nProctology 28 \nPsychiatry 26 \nPulmonary disease 29 \nRadiology 30 \nRheumatology R4 \nThoracic surgery 33 \nUrology 34 \nVascular surgery S4 \n Physician 28 \n October 2005 28-3 Enrollment Policy for Physicians \nProviders (in-state and ou t-of-state) who meet enr ollment requirements are \neligible to participate in the Alabama Medicaid Program. The PA or CRNP \nmust send a copy of the prescripti ve authority granted by the licensing \nboard in order for the PA or CRNP to be added to the Provider License File \nfor the purpose of reimbursing the phar macist for the prescriptions written \nby the PA or CRNP. This copy must be sent to EDS Provider Enrollment, \nP.O. Box 241685, AL 36124-1685. \nEDS will not enroll physicians havi ng limited licenses unless complete \ninformation as to the limitations and re asons are submitted in writing to the \nProvider Enrollment Unit for review and consideration for enrollment. \n28.2 Benefits and Limitations \nThis section describes program-specif ic benefits and limitations. Refer to \nChapter 3, Verifying Recipient Eligib ility, for general benefit information and \nlimitations. \nPhysicians are expected to render medically necessary services to \nMedicaid patients in the same manner and under the same standards as for their private patients, and bill t he Alabama Medicaid Agency their usual \nand customary fee. \nA physician enrolled in and providing services through an approved \nresidency training program will be assigned a pseudo Medicaid license \nnumber, but may not bill fo r services performed as part of the residency \ntraining program. A pseudo Medicaid license number is required on written prescriptions issued to Medicaid recipients. To request a pseudo Medicaid \nlicense number, please refer to Chapter 2, Becoming a Medicaid provider \nfor additional information. \nWritten medication prescriptions should have a typed or printed name of \nthe prescriber on the prescription, handwriting should be legible, and the \npseudo license number for a resident should be clearly indicated. Pharmacists must have the physician’s license number prior to billing \nfor prescriptions. Pharmacies sha ll use the correct physician license \nnumber when submitting a pharmacy claim to Medicaid. \nSupervising physicians may bill for services rendered to Medicaid \nrecipients by residents enrolled in and providing services through (as part of) an approved residency training program. The following rules shall apply \nto physicians supervising residents as part of an approved residency \ntraining program: \na. The supervising physician sha ll sign and date the admission history \nand physical progress notes written by the resident. \nb. The supervising physician shall review all treatment plans and \nmedication orders written by the resident. \nc. The supervising physician shall be available by phone or pager. \nd. The supervising physician shall designate another physician to \nsupervise the resident in his/her absence. \ne. The supervising physician shall not delegate a task to the resident \nwhen regulations specify that the physician perform it personally or \nwhen such delegation is prohibited by state law or the facility's policy. \nPhysician \n28-4 October 2005 Payments from Medicaid funds can be made only to physicians who \nprovide the services; therefore, no reimbursement can be made to patients \nwho may personally pay for the service rendered. \nReimbursement may be made to a physician submitting a claim for \nservices furnished by another physician in the event there is a reciprocal \narrangement as long as block 19 on the claim identifies the physician who \nactually furnished the service. Bo th physicians should be enrolled as \nMedicaid providers. The reciprocal arrangement may not exceed 14 days \nin the case of an informal arrangement or 90 continuous days in the case \nof an arrangement involving per diem or other fee-for-time compensation. \nProviders participating in a reciproc al arrangement should be enrolled with \nthe Alabama Medicaid Agency. \nThe physician agrees when billing Medica id for a service that the physician \nwill accept as payment in full, the amou nt paid by Medicaid for that service, \nplus any cost-sharing amount to be paid by the recipient, and that no additional charge will be made. Conditional collections from patients, made \nbefore Medicaid pays, which are to be refunded after Medicaid pays, are \nnot permissible. The physician may bill the patient, in addition to the cost-sharing fee, for services rendered w hen benefit limitations are exhausted \nfor the year or when the service is a Medicaid non-covered benefit. \nHowever, the provider (or their staff) must advise each patient prior to \nservices being rendered when Medica id payment will not be accepted, and \nthe patient will be responsible for the b ill. If a provider routinely accepts a \nMedicaid assignment, he or she may not bill Medicaid or the recipient for a service he or she did not provide, i.e., missed or canceled appointment. \nA hospital-based physician-employed by and paid by a hospital may not bill \nMedicaid for services performed for which the hospital is reimbursed. A hospital-based physician shall bill t he Medicaid Program on a CMS-1500, \nHealth Insurance Claim Form or assign their billing rights to the hospital, \nwhich shall bill the Medicaid Program on a CMS-1500 form. A hospital-based physician who is not employed by and paid by a hospital may bill \nMedicaid using a CMS-1500 claim form. \nA physician enrolled in a residency training program and whose practice is \nlimited to the institution in which t hat resident is pl aced shall not bill \nMedicaid for services performed t herein for which the institution is \nreimbursed through the hospitals' cost reports. For tracking purposes, \nthese physicians will be assigned pseudo Medicaid license numbers. \nHospital-based physicians are reimbu rsed under the same general system \nas is used in Medicare. Bills for serv ices rendered are submitted as follows: \n• All hospital-based physicians, incl uding emergency room physicians, \nradiologists, and pathologists, will bill Medicaid on a CMS-1500 claim form, or assign their billing rights to the hospital, which shall bill Medicaid on a CMS-1500 claim form. \n• Physician services personally r endered for individual patients will be \npaid only on a reasonable charge basis (i.e., claims submitted under an individual provider number on a physician claim form). This includes \nservices provided by a r adiologist and/or pathologist. \n• Reasonable charge services are: 1) personally furnished for a patient \nby a physician; 2) ordinarily require performance by a physician and; 3) contribute to the diagnosis or treatment of an individual patient. Physician 28 \n October 2005 28-5 \nNOTE : \nIf a provider routinely accepts Medi caid assignments, he/she may not bill \nMedicaid or the recipient for a service he/she did not provide, i.e., \"no call\" \nor “no show”. \n28.2.1 Physician-Employed Practitioner Services \nMedicaid payment may be made for the professional services of the \nfollowing physician-employed practitioners: \n• Physician Assistants (PAs) \n• Certified Registered Nu rse Practitioners (CRNPs) \nNurse Practitioner is defined as a Registered Professional Nurse who is \ncurrently licensed to practice in the state, who meets the applicable State \nof Alabama requirements governing the qualifications of nurse \npractitioners. \nPhysician Assistant means a person who meets the applicable State of \nAlabama requirements governing the q ualifications for assistants to \nprimary care physicians. \nAll services requiring additional educ ation and training beyond the scope of \npractice billed by a CRNP/PA must be documented in the approved \ncollaborative agreement from the B oard of Medical Examiners (BME) and \nthe Alabama Board of Nursing (ABN) between the practitioner and physician. The only exception is for those “routine” services within the \nscope of practice approved by the applicable licensing and governing \nboards. Services billed outside a CRNP/PA scope of practice and/or collaborative agreement are subj ect to post-payment review. \nMedicaid will make payment for services of Physician Assistants (PAs) and \nCertified Registered Nurse Practi tioners (CRNPs) who are legally \nauthorized to furnish services and who render the services under the \nsupervision of an employing physi cian with payment made to the \nemploying physician. Medicaid will not make payment to the PA or CRNP. Generally, CRNPs and PAs are reimburs ed at 80% of the allowed amount \nfor all services except lab and inje ctables, which should pay at 100%. \nThe employing physician must be a Medicaid provider in active status. The PA or CRNP must enroll with Medicaid and receive an Alabama \nMedicaid provider number with the employing physician as the payee. \nCovered services furnished by the PA or CRNP must be billed under the \nPA’s or CRNP’s name and Alabama Medicaid provider number. \nThe covered services for PAs and CRNPs are limited to injectable drugs, \nlaboratory services in which the laborat ory is CLIA certified to perform, and \nthe CPT codes identified in A ppendix O, CRNP & PA Services. \nThe office visits performed by the PA or CRNP count against the recipient's \nyearly benefit limitation. \nThe PA or CRNP may make physician-r equired visits to nursing facilities. \nThe PA or CRNP may not make physician-required inpatient visits to \nhospitals or other institutional settings to qualify for payment to the \nphysician or to satisfy current regulations as physician visits. \nPhysician \n28-6 October 2005 The PA or CRNP may provide low comp lexity or straightforward medical \ndecision-making services in the emergency room or as an assistant at \nsurgery (identified surgical codes only) for reimbursement by Medicaid. \nSee Appendix O for a list of covered services. \nThe employing-physician need not be phy sically present with the PA or \nCRNP when the services are being rendered to the recipient; however, the \nphysician must be immediately availabl e to the PA or CRNP for direct \ncommunication by radio, telephone, or telecommunication. \nThe PA’s or CRNP’s employing phy sician is responsible for the \nprofessional activities of the PA or C RNP and for assuring that the services \nprovided are medically necessary and appropriate for the patient. \nThere shall be no independent, unsuperv ised practice by PAs or CRNPs. \n28.2.2 Covered Services \nIn general, Medicaid covers physician services if the services meet the \nfollowing conditions: \n• Considered medically necessary by the attending physician \n• Designated by procedure codes in the Physicians' Current Procedural \nTerminology (CPT), HCPCS or designated by special procedure codes \ncreated by Medicaid for its own use \nThis table contains details on selected covered services. \nService Coverage and Conditions \nAdd-on Code Add-on Code definition in t he CPT is recognized and allowed for \npayment with the appropriate primary code. \nAdministration Fee Please refer to Appendix H, Medica id Physician Drug List, section \nH.1 (Policy) for information regarding office visits, chemotherapy, \nand administration fees. \nPlease refer to Appendix A, Well Child Check-Up, Section A.6.1 \n(Fees) for information regarding the use of designated VFC codes \nfor billing immunization administration fee(s). \nAllergy \nTreatments Please refer to Appendix H, Medica id Physician Drug List, section \nH.1.2 (Chemotherapy Injections) for information. \nAnesthesia Anesthesia is covered. See Chapter 38, Anesthesiology. \nArtificial Eyes Artificial eyes must be prescribed by a physician. \nBreathing or \nInhalation \nTreatments Breathing or inhalation treatments are a covered service. Any \nmedication provided during a breathi ng treatment (e.g., Albuterol) is \nconsidered a component of the treatment charge. \nCardiac \nCatheterization Please note that modifier 51 (m ultiple procedures ) should not be \nutilized with cardiac codes 93501-93533 or 93539-93556. \nCerumen Removal Code 69210 (which requires skill and use of forceps, suction, or \ncerumen spoon) is a covered service. \nChemotherapy Administration Please note code 36823 includes chemotherapy dose \ncalculation/administration by injection into the perfusate. Codes \n96408-96425 should not be utilized with codes 96408-96425. \nComputerized \nAxial \nTomograph \n(CAT) Scans CAT scans are covered as medically necessary. \nChiropractors Chiropractic services ar e covered only for QMB recipients and for \nservices referred directly as a result of an EPSDT screening. \n Physician 28 \n October 2005 28-7 Service Coverage and Conditions \nChromosomal \nStudies Medicaid can pay for these studi es on prospective mothers in an \neffort to identify conditions that could result in the birth of an \nabnormal child. \n \nCircumcision Circumcision of newborns is a covered service. If medically \nnecessary, non-newborn circumcision is covered. \n \nDiet Instruction Diet instruction performed by a physician is considered part of a \nroutine visit. \nDrugs Non-injectable drugs must be billed by a pharmacy to be covered. \nPhysicians who administer injectable drugs to their patients may \nbill Medicaid for the cost of the drug by using the procedure code \ndesignated by Medicaid for this purpose. \nExaminations Physician vi sits for examinations ar e counted as part of each \nrecipient’s benefit limit of 14 physic ian visits per year. Exception: \nCertified Emergencies. \nAnnual routine physical examinations are not covered except \nthrough EPSDT. Refer to Appendix A, EPSDT, for details. \nMedical examinations for such reasons as insurance policy \nqualifications are not covered. \nPhysical examinations for estab lishment of total and permanent \ndisability status if considered medically necessary are covered. \nMedicaid requires a physician's visit once every 60 days for \npatients in a nursing facility. Patients in intermediate care facilities \nfor the mentally retarded must receive a complete physical examination at least annually. \nEyecare Eye examinations by physici ans are a Medicaid covered service. \nPhysician visits for eyecare di sease are counted as part of each \nrecipient's benefit limit of 14 physician visits per year. \nFoot Devices See Chapter 14, Durable Medical Equipment (DME), for details \n \nGastric bypass Covered with prior authorization \n \nHearing Aids See Chapter 10, Audiol ogy/Hearing Services, for details. \nHyperbaric \nOxygen Therapy Topically applied oxygen is not hyperbaric and is not covered. \nHBO therapy should not be a replacement for other standard successful therapeutic measure. Medical necessity for the use of \nhyperbaric oxygen for more than two months must be prior approved (see Chapter 4, Obtaining Prior Authorization). Physician attendance should be billed using procedure code \n99183. Prior approval for HBO for diagnoses not listed below or \nfor treatments exceeding the limitat ions listed may be submitted to \nEDS for consideration on an indivi dual recipient basis. Please note \nthat no approval will be granted for diagnoses listed in the \nexclusion section. Program reimbursement for HBO therapy is limited to that which is administered in a chamber for the \ndiagnoses found in Chapter 19 Hospital, under Outpatient \nHyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBO). \nHyperalimention \nParental \n TPN \n IDPN \nIPN Please refer to Section 28.2.9 for documentation requirements \nfor parental, TPN, IDPN, and IPN nutrition. Added: \nHyperalimentation \nPhysician \n28-8 October 2005 Immunizations The Department of Public Health provides vaccines at no charge \nto Medicaid physicians enrolled in the Vaccines For Children \n(VFC) Program. Medicaid reimburses administration fees for \nvaccines provided free of charge through the Vaccines For \nChildren (VFC) Program. Medicaid tracks usage of the vaccine through billing of the administration fee using the appropriate CPT-4 codes. Refer to Appendix A, EPSDT, for more information. \nThe single antigen vaccines may be billed only when medically \njustified and prior authorized. T hese vaccines are listed below: \n• Diphtheria \n• Measles \n• Mumps \n• Rubella \n Payment for immunizations agains t communicable diseases for \nadults will be made if the physician normally charges his patients \nfor this service. \nInfant \nResuscitation Newborn resuscitation (procedure code 99440) is a covered \nservice when the baby's condition is life threatening and immediate resuscitation is necessary to restore and maintain life \nfunctions. Intubation, endotracheal, emergency procedure (procedure code 31500) cannot be billed in conjunction with \nnewborn resuscitation. \nMammography Diagnostic Diagnostic mammography is furnished to a man/woman with signs \nor symptoms of breast disease, or a personal history of breast \ncancer, or a personal histor y of biopsy-proven benign breast \ndisease, and includes a physician’s interpretation of the results of \nthe procedure. Services are not limited. \nMammography \nScreening Furnished to a woman without signs or symptoms of breast \ndisease, for the purpose of earl y detection of breast cancer, and \nincludes a physician’s interpretation of the results of the \nprocedures. Services are limited to one screening mammography \nevery 12 months for women ages 50 through 64. \nMedical \nMaterials and Supplies Costs for medical materials and supplies normally utilized during \noffice visits or surgical procedures are to be considered part of the \ntotal fee for procedures performed by the physician and therefore \nare not generally a separately billable service. \nNewborn Claims Five kinds of newborn ca re performed by physicians in the days \nafter the child's birth when the mother is still in the hospital may be filed under the mother's name and number or the baby's name \nand number: \n1. Routine newborn care (99431, 99433, and discharge codes \n99238 or 99239) \n2. Circumcision (54150 or 54160) \n3. Newborn resuscitation (99440) 4. Standby services following a caesarian section or a high-risk \nvaginal delivery. (99360) \n5. Attendance at delivery (when requested by delivering \nphysician) and initial stabilization of newborn (99436) \nStandby services (procedure code 99360) are covered only when \nthe pediatrician, family prac titioner, neonatologist, general \npractitioner, or non-delivering OB/GYN is on standby in the \noperating or delivery room during a caesarian section or a high-\nrisk vaginal delivery. Attendance of the standby physician in the \nhospital operating or delivery room must be documented in the \noperating or delivery report. \nUse CPT codes when filing claims for these five kinds of care. \nIf these services are billed under the mother's name and number \nand the infant(s) are twins, indicate Twin A or Twin B in Block 19 \nof the claim form. \nAny care other than routine newborn care for a well baby, before \nand after the mother leaves the hospital, must be billed under the \nchild's name and number. Physician 28 \n October 2005 28-9 Newborn \nHearing \nScreening Inpatient newborn hearing screenings are considered an integral \npart of inpatient hospital services. Outpatient facility services for \nnewborn hearing screenings are considered non-covered. \n Limited hearing screen codes 92586 and 92587 (CPT 2002) may \nbe billed in an outpatient setting provided: 1) an infant was \ndischarged prior to receiving the inpatient hearing screen, or 2) an \ninfant was born outside a hospital or birthing center. These codes \nare reimbursable for audiologists, pediatricians, otolaryngologists, \nand EENT. \nComprehensive hearing screen codes 92585/92588 may be billed \nfor: 1) infants who fail the newborn hearing screening prior to \ndischarge from the hospital, or 2) infants/children fail a hearing screening at any time following discharge. Comprehensive hearing screenings should be performed on infants by three months of age \nif they failed the newborn hearing screening prior to discharge. \nCode 92585 is reimbursable for ot olaryngologists, audiologists, \npediatricians, and EENT. Code 92588 is reimbursable for \notolaryngologists, audiologi sts, pediatricians, EENT, and \nneurologists. \nObstetrical \nServices Refer to Section 28.2.10 \nOxygen and \nCompressed \nGas A physician's fee for administering oxygen or other compressed \ngas is a covered service under the Medicaid program. Oxygen \ntherapy is a covered service based on medical necessity and requires prior authorization. Please refer to Chapter 14, DME, for more information. \nPodiatrist Service Covered for QMB or EPSDT referred services only. See Chapter \n29, Podiatrist, for more details. \nPost Surgical Visits Post-surgical hospital or office visi ts for conditions directly related \nto major surgical procedures are covered by the surgical fee. Post-surgical visits cannot be billed separately the day of, or up to 62 \ndays after surgery. \nProsthetic \nDevices Internal prosthetic devices (e.g., Smith Peterson Nail or \npacemaker) are a covered benefit. \nPsychiatric Services Physician visits for psychiatric services are counted as part of \neach recipient's benefit limit of 14 physician visits per year. \nPsychiatric evaluation or testi ng are covered services under the \nPhysicians' Program if services are rendered by a physician in \nperson and are medically necessary . Psychiatric evaluations are \nlimited to one per calendar year, per provider, per recipient. \nPsychotherapy visits are included in t he office visit limit of 12 visits \nper calendar year. Office visits are not covered when billed in \nconjunction with psychotherapy codes. \nPsychiatric services under the Ph ysicians' Program are confined \nto use with psychiatric diagnosis (290-319) and must be \nperformed by a physician. \nHospital visits are not covered when billed in conjunction with \npsychiatric therapy on the same day. \nFor services rendered by psychol ogist, see Chapter 34 for details. \nPsychiatric day care is not a covered benefit under the Physicians' \nProgram. \nRadiation \nTreatment \nManagement Radiation treatment management services do not need to be \nfurnished on consecutive days. Up to two units may be billed on \nthe same date of service as l ong as there has been a separate \nbreak in therapy sessions. \nSecond \nOpinions Physician visits for second opini ons are counted as part of each \nrecipient's benefit limit of 14 physician visits per year. \nOptional Surgery: Second opi nions (regarding non-emergency \nsurgery) are highly recommended in the Medicaid program when \nthe recipients request them. \nDiagnostic Services: Payment may be made for covered \ndiagnostic services deemed necessary by the second physician. \nPhysician \n28-10 October 2005 Self-inflicted \ninjuries Self-inflicted injuries are covered. \nSurgery Cosmetic surgery is covered only when prior approved for medical \nnecessity. Examples of medical ne cessity include prompt repair of \naccidental injuries or improvement of the functioning of a \nmalformed body member. \nElective surgery is covered when medically necessary. Multiple surgeries are governed by the following rules: \nWhen multiple or bilateral surgic al procedures that add significant \ntime or complexity are performed at the same operative session, Medicaid pays for the procedure with the highest allowed amount \nand half of the allowed amount for each subsequent procedure. \nThis also applies to laser su rgical procedures. Additional \npayments will not be made for procedures considered to be \nmutually exclusive or incidental . When multiple and/or bilateral \nprocedures are billed in conjunction with one another that meet the definition of bundled, subset, CPT’s “Format of Terminology”, \nand/or comprehensive/component (bundled) codes, then, the \nprocedure with the highest allowed amount will be paid while the lesser procedure will not be considered for payment as the procedure is considered an integral part of the covered service.. \nAny dressing/compression wrap performed in conjunction with \nwound debridement is considered part of the debridement \nservices and is not separately covered/billable. \nCertain procedures are commonly ca rried out as integral parts of \na total service and as such do not warrant a separate charge. \nWhen incidental procedures (e.g., excision of a previous scar or \npuncture of an ovarian cyst) are performed during the same \noperative session, Medicaid reimburses for the major procedure \nonly. \nLaparotomy is covered when it is the only surgical procedure \nperformed during the operative session or when performed with an unrelated or incidental surgical procedure. Surgeons performing \nlaparoscopic procedures on reci pients where a laparoscopic \nprocedure code (PC) has not been established should bill the \nmost descriptive PC with modifier 22 (unusual procedural \nservices) until the new PC is established. \nCPT defined Add-on codes are considered for coverage when \nbilled with the appropriate primary procedure code. \nEffective January 1, 2005, code 69990 (operating microscope) \nmay be paid separately only when submitted with the following \nCPT codes: 61304-61546, 61550-61711, 62010-62100, 63081-63308, 63704-63710, 64831, 64834-64836, 64840-64858, 64861-64870, 64885-64898, 64905-64907. \nCertain relatively small surg ical procedure codes formally \ndesignated in the CPT with an (*) may be billed in addition to an \noffice visit. Additionally, thes e codes do not carry the global \nsurgical package concept of inclus ion of post-operative care within \n62 days of the surgery. In the 2004 CPT guidelines the (*) \ndesignation has been removed. Fo r reference, these codes are \nlisted the Procedure Codes section in Chapter 28 of the Billing Manual. \nIt is necessary to append the appropriate anatomical modifiers to \nsurgical codes to differentiate between multiple surgeries and \nsites. \nAppropriate use of CPT and HCPCs modifiers is required to \ndifferentiate between sites and procedures. Please refer to \nSection 28.5.3 Procedure Codes and Modifiers \nNOTE: Surgeons are responsib le for submitting hard copy \nhysterectomy and tubal ligation consent forms to EDS at PO Box \n244032, Montgomery, AL 36124 Attn: Desiree Nelson. Physician 28 \n October 2005 28-11 Surgery, Breast \nReconstruction Breast reconstruction surgery is reimbursable following a \nmedically necessary mastectomy when performed for the removal \nof cancer. All reconstructi ve procedures require prior \nauthorization. The term \"rec onstruction\" shall include \naugmentation mammoplasty, reduction mammoplasty, and mastoplexy. Breast reconstruction surgeries are governed by the following rules: \n• The reconstruction follows a medically necessary mastectomy \nfor the removal of cancer \n• The recipient is eligible for Medicaid on the date of \nreconstruction surgery \n• The recipient elects reconstr uction within two years of the \nmastectomy surgery \n• The diagnosis codes used are appropriate \n• The surgery is performed in the manner chosen by the patient \nand the physician in accordance with guidelines consistent \nwith Medicare and other third party payers \n• For more information regardi ng prior authorization, please \nrefer to Chapter 4 Obtaining Prior Authorization. For more information related to breast prosthesis, please refer to \nChapter 14 Durable Medical Equipment. \nTherapy Physician visits for therapy are counted as part of each recipient's \nbenefit limit of 14 physician visits per year. See Rule No. 560-X-6.14 for details about this benefit limit in the Alabama Medicaid \nAgency Administrative Code, Chapter 6. \nPhysical Therapy is not cover ed when provided in a physician's \noffice. Physical therapy is covered only when prescribed by a \nphysician and provided in a hospital setting. Refer to Chapter 19, Hospital, for more information. \nGroup Therapy is a covered serv ice when a psychiatric diagnosis \nis present and the therapy is prescribed, performed, and billed by \nthe physician personally. Group Therapy is not covered when performed by a caseworker, social services worker, mental health \nworker, or any counseling professional other than physician. \nGroup Therapy is included in the ph ysician visit limit of 14 visits \nper year. \nSpeech Therapy for a speech rela ted diagnosis, such as stroke \n(CVA) or partial laryngectomy, is a covered benefit when \nprescribed by and performed by a physician in his office. Speech \ntherapy performed in an inpatient or outpatient hospital setting or \nin a nursing facility is a covered benefit, but is considered covered \nas part of the reimbursement made to the facility and should not be billed by the physician. \nFamily Therapy is a covered serv ice when a psychiatric diagnosis \nis present and the physician pr oviding the service supplies \ndocumentation that justifies the medical necessity of the therapy for each family member. Family therapy is not covered unless the \npatient is present. Family Therapy is not covered when performed \nby a caseworker, social service wo rker, mental health worker, or \nany counseling professional other than a physician. Family \nTherapy is included in the physician visit limit of 14 visits per year. \nTransplants See Chapter 19, Hospitals, for transplant coverage. \nVentilation Study Ventilation study is covered if done in physician's office by the \nphysician or under the phys ician's direct supervision. \nDocumentation in the medical record must contain all of the following: \n• Graphic record \n• Total and timed vital capacity \n• Maximum breathing capacity \nAlways indicate if the studies were performed with or without a \nbronchodilator. \nPhysician \n28-12 October 2005 Well Baby \nCoverage Well baby coverage is covered only on the initial visit, which must \nbe provided within eight weeks of the birth. When the well-baby \ncheckup is done, the physici an should bill procedure code 99432. \nOnly one well-baby checkup can be paid per lifetime, per recipient. \nRefer to Appendix A, EPSDT, for information on additional \npreventive services. \n \nNOTE : \nFor newborn hospital discharge services performed on a subsequent \nadmission date, use code 99238. Please use code 99435 when filing \nclaims for newborns assessed and discharged from the hospital or \nbirthing room on the same date. \n28.2.3 Non-covered Services \nService Coverage and Conditions \nAcupuncture Acupuncture is not covered. \nAfter Office \nHours The following services are not covered: After office hours, services \nprovided in a location other than the physician’s office, and office \nservices provided on an emergency basis. \nAutopsies Autopsies are not covered. \nBiofeedback Biofeedback is not covered. \nBlood Tests Blood tests are not covered for marriage licenses. \nCasting and Supplies Some surgical codes are cons idered an inclusive package of \nprofessional services and/or supplies and are not considered \nseparately allowable or reimburs able as the fracture repair or \nsurgical codes is inclusive of thes e services. An example of this \nwould be a surgical code for a fractu re repair which is inclusive of \nany casting and strapping services or supplies. \nCerumen \nRemoval When a simple instrument is used, such as a curette, or a solvent or \nlavage is used, and the cerumen comes out easily, it is considered a \ncomponent of an evaluation and management charge. \nChiropractors Chiropractic services are not covered, except for QMB recipients and \nfor services referred directly as a result of an EPSDT screening. \nChromosomal Studies Chromosomal studies (amniocentesis) on unborn children being \nconsidered for adoption are not covered. \nMedicaid can pay for these studi es on prospective mothers in an \neffort to identify conditions that could result in the birth of an \nabnormal child. \nDressing and \nCompression \nWrap Any dressing/compression wrap performed in conjunction with \nwound debridement is considered par t of the debridement services \nand is not separately covered/billable. \nExperimental \nTreatment or \nSurgery Experimental treatment or surgery is not covered. \nFiling Fees Filing Fees are not covered. \nHypnosis Hypnosis is not covered. \nLaetrile \nTherapy Laetrile therapy is not covered. \nMutually \nExclusive \nProcedures Mutually exclusive procedures are those codes that cannot \nreasonably be done in the same session and are considered not \nseparately allowable or reimbursabl e. For example, a vaginal and \nabdominal hysterectomy on the same date of service. \nOxygen and \nCompressed \nGas A physician's fee for administering oxygen or other compressed gas \nis a covered service under the Medicaid program; the cost of the \noxygen or gas is not covered. Physician 28 \n October 2005 28-13 Service Coverage and Conditions \nSurgery \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n When multiple and/or bilateral pr ocedures are billed in conjunction \nwith one another and meet the CPTs definition of “Format of \nTerminology” (bundled or subset ) and/or comprehensive/component \n(bundled) codes, then the procedure with the highest amount will be \npaid while the procedure with the lesser amount will not be considered for payment as the pr ocedure is considered an integral \npart of the covered service. Please refer to Section 28.5.3 \nProcedure Codes and Modifiers. \n Incidental surgical procedures are defined as those codes that are \ncommonly carried out as integral par ts of a total service and as such \ndo not warrant a separate charge. An example of this would be lysis \nof adhesions during the same se ssion as an abdominal surgery. \nPost Surgical \nVisits Post-surgical hospital or office visits for conditions directly related to \nmajor surgical procedures are covered by the surgical fee. Post-\nsurgical visits cannot be billed separ ately one day prior to surgery or \nup to 62 days after surgery. \nVisits by Assistant Surgeon or Surgeons are not covered. \nPreventive \nMedicine Medicaid does not cover preventive medicine other than those \nspecified elsewhere, including but not limited to, EPSDT screening. \nSyntocin Syntocin is not covered. \nTelephone Consultations Telephone consultations are not covered. \nTherapy Occupational and Recreati onal Therapies are not covered. \n \n28.2.4 Limitations on Services \nWithin each calendar year each recipient is limited to no more than a total \nof 14 physician visits in offices, hospital outpatient settings, nursing \nfacilities, rural health clinics or Federa lly Qualified Health Centers. Visits \nnot counted under this benefit limit will include, but not be limited to, visits \nfor: EPSDT, prenatal care, postnatal care, and family planning. Physicians \nservices provided in a hospital outpat ient setting that have been certified as \nan emergency do not count against the physician benefit limit of 14 per \ncalendar year. If a patient receives anc illary services in a doctor's office, by \nthe physician or under his/her direct s upervision, and the doctor submits a \nclaim only for the ancillary services but not for the office visit, then the \nservices provided will not be counted as a visit. \nFor further information regarding outpatient maintenance dialysis and \nESRD, refer to Chapter 35, Renal Dialysis Facility. \nA new patient office visit codes shall not be paid to the same physician or \nsame group practice for a recipient more than once in a three-year period. \n28.2.5 Physician Services to Hospital Inpatients \nIn addition to the 14 physician visits, Medicaid covers up to 16 inpatient \ndates of service per physician, per recipient, per calendar year. For \npurposes of this limitation, each specialty within a group or partnership is \nconsidered a single provider. \nWhen filing claims for recipients enrolled in the Patient 1st Program, please \nrefer to Chapter 39, Patient 1st, to determine whether your services require \na referral from the Primary Medical Provider (PMP). \nPhysician \n28-14 October 2005 Physician hospital visits are limited to one visit per day, per recipient, per \nprovider. \nPhysician(s) may bill for inpatient prof essional interpretation(s), when that \ninterpretation serves as the official and final report documented in the patient’s medical record. Professio nal interpretation may be billed in \naddition to a hospital visit if the rounding physician also is responsible for \nthe documentation of the final report for the procedure in the patient’s \nmedical record. Professional interpretation may not be billed in addition to \nhospital visits if the provider reviews results in the medical record or \nunofficially interprets medical, laborat ory, or radiology tests. Review and \ninterpretation of such tests and resu lts are included in the evaluation and \nmanagement of the inpatient. Medicaid will cover either one hospital visit or \nprofessional interpretation(s) up to the allowed benefit limit for most \nservices. Professional interpretations are allowed in the inpatient setting for \nthe following services: \nEchocardiography (i.e., M-mode, tran sthoracic, complete and follow up) \nEchocardiography (i.e., 2D, transesophageal) \nEchocardiography (i.e., Doppler pulsed or continuous wave with spectral \ndisplay, complete and follow up) \nCardiac Catheterizations \nComprehensive electrophysiologic evaluations and follow up testing Programmed stimulation and pacing \nIntra-operative epicardial and endocardial pacing and mapping \nIntracardiac catheter ablations; intracardiac echocardiography \nEvaluation of cardiovascular function \nPlethysmography, total body and tracing \nAmbulatory blood pressure monitoring Cerebrovascular arterial studies, extrem ity arterial studies, venous studies, \nand visceral and penile studies \nCircardian respiratory pattern recording (i.e., pediatric pneumogram), infant Needle electromyography \nIschemic limb exercise test \nAssessment of aphasia \nDevelopmental testing \nNeurobehavioral status exam and ne uropsychological testing battery Physician 28 \n October 2005 28-15 Professional interpretations for lab and x-ray (CPT code 70000 through \n80000 services) in the inpatient setti ng can only be billed by pathologists \nand radiologists. The only exception is for professional interpretations by \ncardiologists for catheterization or arterial studies and for select laboratory procedures by oncologists and hematologists. Professional \ninterpretations/components done by other physicians for services in this \nprocedure code range are included in the hospital visit if one is done. If no hospital visit is made, professional interpretation by physicians other than \nradiologists, pathologists, oncologists, hematologists, and cardiologists \nshould not be billed as these services are covered only for the above-mentioned specialties. \nA physician hospital visit and hospit al discharge shall not be paid to the \nsame physician on the same day. If both are billed, only the discharge shall \nbe paid. \nProfessional interpretations performed for an inpatient are counted by \ndates of service rather than the number of interpretation performed. \nAn office visit and an inpatient visit shall not be paid to the same physician \non the same day. If both are billed, then the first Procedure Code billed will be paid. \nPhysician consults are limited to one per day per recipient. \n28.2.6 Critical Care \nWhen caring for a critically ill patient, fo r whom the constant attention of the \nphysician is required, the appropriat e critical care procedure code (99291 \nand 99292) must be billed. Critical care guidelines are defined in the \nCurrent Procedural Terminology (CPT) and Provider Manual. Critical care \nis considered a daily global inclusive of all services directly related to \ncritical care. These codes can only be billed for a recipient age 25 months \nand older. \nCoverage of critical care may total no more than four hours per day. \nThe actual time period spent in attendance at the patient's bedside or \nperforming duties specifically related to that patient, irrespective of breaks \nin attendance, must be documented in the patient's medical record. \nRESTRICTIONS: No individual procedures related to critical care may be billed in addition to \nprocedure codes 99291 and 99292, except: \n• An EPSDT screening may be billed in lieu of the initial hospital \ncare (P/C 99221, 99222, or 99223). If screening is billed, the initial hospital care cannot be billed. \n• Procedure code 99082 (transportation or escort of patient) may \nalso be billed with critical care (99291 and/or 99292). Only the attending physician may bill this service and critical care. \nResidents or nur ses who escort a patient may not bill either \nservice. \nPhysician \n28-16 October 2005 LIMITATIONS: \n• Procedure codes 99291 and 99292 may be billed by the \nphysician providing the care of the critically ill or injured patient \nin place of service 41, Ambulance, if care is personally \nrendered by the physician providin g the care of the critically ill \nor injured patient. \n28.2.7 Pediatric and Ne onatal Critical Care \nCPT Code Description Criteria \n99293 Initial Inpatient Pediatric \nCritical Care, per day, for the \nevaluation and management of \na critically ill infant or young \nchild, 29 days through 24 \nmonths of age Not valid for ages 28 \ndays or less, can be \nbilled by any physician provider type \n99294 Subsequent Inpatient Pediatric \nCritical Care per day, for the evaluation and management of \na critically ill infant or young \nchild, 29 days through 24 months of age. Not valid for ages 28 days \nor less, can be billed by any physician provider \ntype \n99295 Initial Inpatient Neonatal \nCritical Care, per day for the \nevaluation and management of \na critically ill neonate, 28 days of age or less Not valid for ages 29 days \nor older, can be billed by \nany physician provider \ntype \n \n \n99296 Subsequent Inpatient Neonatal \nCritical Care, per day for the \nevaluation and management of a critically ill neonate, 28 days of age or less Not valid for ages 29 days \nor older, can be billed by \nany physician provider type \nThe pediatric and neonatal critical ca re codes (99293-99296) include \nmanagement, monitoring and treatment of the patient, including respiratory, pharmacological control of the circulatory system, enteral and \nparenteral nutrition, metabolic and hematologic maintenance, parent/family \ncounseling, case management services and personal direct supervision of the health care team in the performance of their daily activities. \nRoutinely these codes may include any of the following services, therefore \nthese services should not be billed separately from the critical care codes 99293-99296: umbilical venous or umbilical arterial catheters, central or \nperipheral vessel catheterization, other arterial catheters, oral or nasal \ngastric tube placement, endotracheal intubation, lumbar puncture, suprapubic bladder aspiration, bladder catheterization, initiation and \nmanagement of mechanical ventilation or CPAP, surfactant administration, \nintravascular fluid administration, transfusion of blood components \n(excluding exchange transfusions), vascular puncture, invasive or non-\ninvasive electronic monitoring of vital signs, beside pulmonary function \ntesting, and/or monitoring or interpretation of blood gases or oxygen saturation. Physician 28 \n October 2005 28-17 The following criteria should be used as guidelines for the correct reporting \nof neonatal and pediatric critical care codes for the critically ill \nneonate/infant. Only one criterion is requir ed to be classified as critically ill. \n• Respiratory support by ventilator or CPAP \n• Nitric oxide or ECMO \n• Prostaglandin, Indotropin of Chronotropic or Insulin infusions \n• NPO with IV fluids \n• Acute Dialysis (renal or peritoneal) \n• Weight less than 1,250 grams \n• Acute respiratory distress in a pediatric admission requiring oxygen \ntherapy with at least daily adjustment and FIO2>35% oxygen by oxyhood. \nRESTRICTIONS: \nNo individual procedures related to critical care may be billed in addition to \nprocedure codes 99293-99296 except: \n• Chest tube placement \n• Pericardiocentesis or thoacentesis \n• Intracranial taps \n• Initial hospital care history and physical or EPSDT screen may be \nbilled in conjunction with 99295. Both may not be billed. NOTE: One EPSDT screen for the hospitalization will encompass all \ndiagnoses identified during the hospi tal stay for referral purposes. \n• Standby (99360), resuscitation (994 40), or attendance at delivery \n(99436) may be billed in addition to critical care. Only one of these \ncodes may be billed in addition to neonatal intensive care critical \ncare codes. \nLIMITATIONS: \n• Code 99293 (initial inpatient pediatric critical care) is reported for \nthe initial evaluation and management on the first day for infants \n29 days through 24 months of age. \n• Code 99294 (subsequent inpatient pediatric critical care) is \nreported for subsequent days (p er day) for infants 29 days \nthrough 24 months of age. \n• Code 99295 (initial inpatient neonatal critical care) is reported for \nsubsequent days (per day) for neonates, 28 days of age or less. \nPhysician \n28-18 October 2005 • Code 99296 (subsequent inpatient neonatal critical care) is \nreported for subsequent days (p er day) for neonates, 28 days of \nage or less. \n• Pediatric, neonatal critical care codes and intensive (non-critical) \nlow birth weight service codes are reported once per day per \nrecipient. \n• Subsequent Hospital Care codes (99231-99233) cannot be billed \non the same date of service as neonatal critical care codes \n(99293-99296) \n• Only one unit of critical care can be billed per child per day in the \nsame facility. Medicaid pays the first claim received and denies \nsubsequent claims (first in, first out policy). \n• Critical care is considered to be an evaluation and management \nservice. Although usually furnished in a critical or intensive care \nunit, critical care may be provided in any inpatient health care \nsetting. Services provided which do not meet critical care criteria, should be billed under the appropriate hospital care codes. If a \nrecipient is readmitted to the NI CU/ICU, the provider must be the \nprimary physician in order for NICU critical care codes to be billed again. \n• Once the patient is no longer considered by the attending \nphysician to be critical, the S ubsequent Hospital Care codes \n(99231-99233) should be billed. Only one unit can be billed per \nday per physician regardless of specialty. Medicaid pays the first \nclaim received and denies subsequent claims (first in, first out policy). \n• Transfers to the pediatric unit fr om the NICU cannot be billed using \ncritical care codes. Subsequent ho spital care would be billed in \nthese instances. \n• Global payments encompass all care and procedures that are \nincluded in the rate. Provider s may not perform an EPSDT screen \nand refer to a partner or other physician to do procedures. All procedures that are included in the daily critical care rate, \nregardless of who performed them, are included in the global \ncritical care code. \n• Consultant care rendered to children for which the provider is not \nthe primary attending physician must be billed using consultation \ncodes. Appropriate procedures may be billed in addition to consultations. If, after the consul tation the provider assumes total \nresponsibility for care, critical care may be billed using the \nappropriate critical care codes as defined above. The medical record must clearly indicate that the provider is assuming total \nresponsibility for care of the pat ient and is the primary attending \nphysician for the patient. Physician 28 \n October 2005 28-19 28.2.8 Intensive (Non-Crit ical) Low Birth Weight \nServices \nCPT Code Description Criteria \n99298 Subsequent intensive care, per day, for the \nevaluation and management of the recovering very low birth May only be billed by a \nneonatologist \n99299 Subsequent intensive care, per day, for the \nevaluation and management of the \nrecovering very low birth weight infant \n(present body weight of 1500-2500 grams) May only be billed by a \nneonatologist \nThese codes are used to report care subsequent to the day of admission \nprovided by a neonatologist directing th e continuing intensive care of the \nvery low birthweight infant who no longer meets the definition of being \ncritically ill. Low birthweight servic es are reported for neonates less than \n2500 grams who do not meet the definiti on of critical care but continue to \nrequire intensive observation and frequent services and intervention only available in an intensive care setting. Services provided to these infants \nexceed those available in less intens ive hospital areas of medical floors. \nThese infants require intensive cardiac and respiratory monitoring, continuous and/or frequent vital signs monitoring, heat maintenance, \nenteral and/or parenteral nutritional adjustments, laboratory and oxygen \nmonitoring and constant observation by the health care team under direct \nsupervision. \nRESTRICTIONS: \nNo individual procedures related to critical care may be billed in addition to \nprocedure codes 99298-99299 except: \n• Chest tube placement \n• Pericardiocentesis or thoracentesis \n• Intracranial taps \nLIMITATIONS: \n• Once the patient is no longer considered by the attending \nphysician to be critical, the S ubsequent Hospital Care codes \n(99231-99233) should be billed. Only one unit can be billed per day per physician regardless of specialty. Medicaid pays the first \nclaim received and denies subsequent claims (first in, first out \npolicy). \n• Global payments encompass all care and procedures that are \nincluded in the rate. Provider s may not perform an EPSDT screen \nand refer to a partner or other physician to do procedures. All \nprocedures that are included in the daily critical care rate, regardless of who performed them, are included in the global \ncritical care code. \nPhysician \n28-20 October 2005 • Consultant care rendered to children for which the provider is not \nthe primary attending physician must be billed using consultation codes. Appropriate procedures may be billed in addition to \nconsultations. If, after the consul tation the provider assumes total \nresponsibility for care, critical care may be billed using the \nappropriate critical care codes as per the setting. The medical \nrecord must clearly indicate that the provider is assuming total \nresponsibility for care of the pat ient and is the primary attending \nphysician for the patient. \n• Pediatric, neonatal critical care codes and intensive (non-critical) \nlow birth weight services codes are only reported once per day per recipient. \n28.2.9 End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) \nPhysician services rendered to each outpatient maintenance dialysis patient provided during a full month shall be billed on a monthly capitation basis using the appropriate procedure code by age as outlined in the CPT. \nMonthly maintenance dialysis payment (i.e., uninterrupted maintenance \ndialysis) is comprehensive and covers most of a physician’s services \nwhether a patient dialyzes at hom e or in an approved ESRD outpatient \nfacility. Dialysis procedures are allowed in addition to the monthly maintenance dialysis payment. In general, the Agency follows Medicare \nguidelines related to monthly capitation payments for physicians. \n Physician services included in the monthly capitation payment for ESRD \nrelated services include, but are not limited to: \n• Assessment and determination of the need for outpatient chronic \ndialysis therapy \n• Assessment and determination of the type of dialysis access and \ndialyzing cycle, \n• Management of the dialysis visits including outpatient visits for \nevaluation and management, management during the dialysis, and telephone calls. \n• Assessment and determination if a recipient meets preliminary criteria \nas a renal transplant candidate including discussions with family members \n• Assessment for a specified diet and nutritional supplementation for the \ncontrol of chronic renal failure, including specifying quantity of total \nprotein, sodium, potassium, amount of fluids, types of anemia and appropriate treatments, type of arthropathy or neuropathy and \nappropriate treatment or referral, estimated ideal dry weight, etc. \nAssessment for diabetic patient’s diet and caloric intake is included also. \n• Prescribing the parameters of intradialytic management including \nanticoagulant, dialysis blood flow rates and temperature, duration and frequency of treatments, etc. \n \nThe monthly capitation payment is limited to once per month, per recipient, per provider. \n Physician 28 \n October 2005 28-21 The following services are not cover ed by the monthly capitation payment \n(MCP) for the attending dialysis physicians and are reimbursed in \naccordance with usual and customary charge rules: \n• Declotting of shunts \n• Covered physician services furnished to hospital inpatients by a \nphysician who elects not to receive the MCP for these service, For \nexample, an attending physici an who provides evaluation and \nmanagement (E & M) services for a renal patient in an inpatient setting \nmay bill appropriate CPT hemodialysis procedures in lieu of certain \nother E & M services for ipatient visits. \n• Nonrenal related physician servic es furnished by the physician \nproviding renal care or by another physician. (These services may not \nbe incidental to services furnished during a dialysis session or office \nvisit necessitated by the renal condition.) For example, physician \nservices rendered to hospitalized inpatient recipients who require \ndialysis but are not receiving di alysis on that day may use the \nappropriate procedure code as described in the CPT. \n \nPhysician services are allowed for outp atient maintenance dialysis patients \nnot performed as prescribed during a full month or interruptedly. An example of interrupted monthly outpatient dialysis maintenance is \npreceding and/or following the period of hospitalization. \n The CPT codes described by age for physicians rendering outpatient \ndialysis services that are interrupted during a full month should be billed on \na per day basis. These codes should be billed for the days of the month in \nwhich the outpatient ESRD related services were performed. \n \nSingle or repeated physician assessments are allowed for hemodialysis or \ndialysis procedures other than hemodialysis. These services are \ncomprehensive and include assessment and management related to the patient’s renal dialysis. Please utili ze the most descriptive and appropriate \nCPT dialysis procedure when billing for single or repeated physician \nevaluation(s). \nDialysis training is a covered se rvice when billed by an approved ESRD \nfacility. \nRefer to Chapter 35, Renal Dialys is Facility, for further details. \n \nParenteral Nutrition \nThe Alabama Medicaid Agency may reimburse for total parenteral \nnutritional (TPN) solutions through the pharmacy program if the recipient \nmeets certain requirements as listed be low. TPN solutions include those \nused for hyperalimentation, intradialytic parenteral nutrition (IDPN), and \nintraperitoneal nutrition (IPN). Requirements must be met and clearly \ndocumented in the medical record for coverage of all TPN. All services \nrendered are subject to post payment review. \n Added: \nParenteral \nNutrition \nPhysician \n28-22 October 2005 Statement of Medical Necessity \nThe ordering physician will be responsi ble for writing a statement of \nmedical necessity. This statement shal l certify that the patient cannot be \nmaintained on oral or enteral feedings and that due to severe pathology of the alimentary tract either hyperaliment ation or IDPN/IPN must be given for \n100% of nutritional needs. The orig inal signed statement of medical \nnecessity must be kept in the patient’s medical record. This certification \nstatement must be written or stamped on the prescription or reproduced on \na form accompanying the prescription. The statement must be signed and \ndated by the certifying physician at the time of each order. \nHyperalimentation \nMedicaid covers hyperalimentation for recipients who meet certain \nrequirements of medical necessity and documentation in the medical \nrecord is sufficient based on the following: \n \n• Documentation in the medical record must validate the patient suffers \nfrom a permanently impaired gastroin testinal tract and that there is \ninsufficient absorption of nutrients to maintain adequate strength and \nweight. The following are considered conditions which could cause insufficient absorption: \n \n1. Crohn’s disease \n2. Obstruction secondary to strict ure or neoplasm of the esophagus \nor stomach \n3. Loss of ability to swallow due to central nervous system disorder, \nwhere the risk of aspiration is great \n4. Short bowel syndrome secondary to massive small bowel \nresection \n5. Malabsorption due to enterocolic, enterovesical or \nenterocutaneous fistulas (TPN temporary until the repair of the fistula) \n6. Motility disorder (pseudo-obs truction) \n7. Prolonged paralytic ileus following a major surgical procedure or \nmultiple injuries \n8. Newborn infants with catastrophic gastrointestinal anomalies such \nas tracheoesophageal fistulas, gastroschisis, omphalocele or massive intestinal atresia \n9. Infants and young children who fail to thrive due to systemic \ndisease or secondary to insufficiency associated with short bowel syndrome, malabsorption or chronic idiopathic diarrhea. \n \n• Medical record documentation must include supporting evidence that \nthe patient cannot be maintained on oral or enteral feedings and that due to severe pathology of the alim entary tract, hyperalimentation must \nbe given in order to meet 100% of the patient’s nutritional needs. Added: Statement of \nMedical Necessity \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Added: Hyperalimentation \nsection Physician 28 \n October 2005 28-23 • Physical signs, symptoms and test results indicating severe pathology \nof the alimentary tract must be clearly documented in the medical record. This would include BUN, serum albumin, and phosphorus. \nMedical records must do cument inability to maintain weight during a \ntrial of at least four weeks of enteral feeding. \nIntradialytic Parenteral Nutrition (I DPN) and Intraperitoneal Nutrition \n(IPN) \nIDPN and IPN involves infusing hyperalim entation fluids as part of dialysis, \nthrough the vascular shunt or intraperitoneally to normalize the amounts of \nalbumin, glucose, and other nutrients in the blood stream to decrease morbidity and mortality associated with protein calorie malnutrition. IDPN \nand IPN solutions are considered not covered for the recipient with a \nfunctioning gastrointestinal tract whose need for parenteral nutrition is only due to the following: \n \n• If IDPN or IPN is offered as an addition to regularly scheduled \ninfusions of TPN \n• If the recipient would not qualify as a candidate for TPN \n• A swallowing disorder \n• A temporary defect in gastric emptying such as a metabolic or \nelectrolyte disorder \n• A psychological disorder, such as depression, impairing food intake \n• A metabolic disorder inducing anorexia, such as cancer \n• A physical disorder impairing food intake, such as dyspnea or severe \npulmonary or cardiac disease \n• A side effect of medication \n• Renal failure and/or dialysis \n \nThe following requirements must be met in order to bill for IDPN or IPN \nsolutions: \n \n• Documentation in the medical record must validate the patient suffers \nfrom a permanently impaired gastroin testinal tract and that there is \ninsufficient absorption of nutrients to maintain adequate strength and weight. \n• Documentation must include that the patient cannot be maintained on \noral or enteral feedings and that due to severe pathology of the \nalimentary tract, IDPN or IPN must be given in order to meet 100% of \nthe patient’s nutritional needs. Added: Physical \nsigns, \nsymptoms…of \nenteral feeding \n \nAdded: Intradialytic \nParenteral \nNutrition (IDPN) \nand \nIntraperitoneal \nNutrition (IPN) \nsection \nPhysician \n28-24 October 2005 • Infusions must be vital to the nutriti onal status of the recipient and not \nsupplemental to a deficient diet or deficiencies caused by dialysis. \n• Physical signs, symptoms and test results indicating severe pathology \nof the alimentary tract must be clearly documented in the medical \nrecord. This would include creatinine (predialysis), serum albumin (predialysis), a low or declining serum cholesterol level, and \nphosphorus. Medical re cords must docu ment inability to maintain \nweight during a trial of at leas t four weeks of enteral feeding. \nRestrictions \nA few solutions used in TPN preparation are considered payable as part of \nthe composite rate for dialysis and sh ould not be billed separately by the \npharmacist; these are as follows: \n \n• Glucose \n• Dextrose \n• Trace Elements \n• Multivitamins \n28.2.10 Anesthesiology \nAdministration of anesthesia is a covered service when administered by or \ndirected by a duly licensed physician for a medical procedure that is \ncovered by Medicaid. Medical direction by an anesthesiologist of more than \nfour Certified Registered Nurse Anesth etists (CRNAs) or Anesthesiology \nAssistants (AAs) concurrent ly will not be covered. \nAdministration of anesthesia by an AA is a covered service when the AA \nhas met the qualifications and standards set forth in Rule No. 540-X-7-.34 \nof the Alabama Board of Medical Examiners. The AA must enroll and \nreceive a provider number to bill the Alabama Medicaid Program. Refer to \nChapter 38, Anesthesiology, for more information. \n28.2.11 Obstetrical and Related Services \nThe following policy refers to matern ity care billed as fee-for-service and \nnot as a part of the Maternity Care program. Refer to Chapter 24, Maternity \nCare Program, for more details. \nPhysician visits for obstetrical care are counted as part of each recipient's \nbenefit limit of 14 physician visits per year under the conditions listed \nbelow. \nMaternity Care and Delivery \nThe services normally provided in maternity cases include antepartum \ncare, delivery, and postpartum care. When a physician provides total obstetrical care, the procedure code which shall be filed on the claim form \nis the code for all-inclusive \"global\" care. The indicated date of service on \n\"global\" claims should be the date of del ivery. If a woman is pregnant at the \ntime she becomes eligible for Medi caid benefits, only those services \nprovided during the time she is eligible will be covered. Added: Restrictions Added: Infusions must \nbe…caused by dialysis. \n Added: Physical signs, \nsymptoms and… \nof enteral feeding. Physician 28 \n October 2005 28-25 \nNOTE : \nWhen a physician provides eight (8) or more prenatal visits, performs \nthe delivery, and provides the pos tpartum care, the physician must \nuse a \"global\" obstetrical code in billing. \nIf a physician submits a \"global\" fee for maternity care and delivery, the \nvisits covered by these codes are not counted against the recipient's limit \nof 14 physician office visits a calendar year. For purposes of \"global\" obstetrical billing, services rendered by members of a group practice are to \nbe considered as services r endered by a single provider. \nNOTE : \nThe date of service on the “globa l” OB claim must be the date of \ndelivery. \nAntepartum care includes all usual prenatal services such as initial office \nvisit at which time pregnancy is diagno sed, initial and subsequent histories, \nphysical examinations, blood pressure recordings, fetal heart tones, \nmaternity counseling, etc.; therefore, additional claims for routine services \nshould not be filed. Antepartum care also includes routine lab work (e.g., \nhemoglobin, hematocrit, chemical urinal ysis, etc.); therefore, additional \nclaims for routine lab work should not be filed. \nTo justify billing for global antepartum care services, physicians must utilize \nthe CPT-4 antepartum care global codes (either 4-6 visits or 7 or more \nvisits), as appropriate. Claims for ant epartum care filed in this manner do \nnot count against the recipient's limit of 14 office visits per year. \nNOTE : \nPhysicians who provide less than four (4) visits for antepartum care \nmust utilize CPT-4 codes under office medical services when billing \nfor these services. These office visit codes will be counted against the \nrecipient's limit of 14 physician visits a calendar year. \nBilling for antepartum care services in addition to \"global\" care is not permissible. However, in cases of pregnancy complicated by toxemia, \ncardiac problems, diabetes, neurologi cal problems or other conditions \nrequiring additional or unusual services or hospitalization, claims for \nadditional services may be filed. If t he physician bills fragmented services \nin any case other than high-risk or complicated pregnancy and then bills a \"global\" code, the fragmented codes shall be recouped. Claims for such \nservices involved in complicated or high risk pregnancies may be filed \nutilizing CPT codes for Office Medical Services. Claims for services involving complicated or high-risk pregnancies must indicate a diagnosis \nother than normal pregnancy and must be for services provided outside of \nscheduled antepartum visits. These claims for services shall be applied against the recipient's limit of 14 physician office visits a calendar year. \nPhysician \n28-26 October 2005 Delivery and Postpartum Care \nDelivery shall include vaginal deliver y (with or without episiotomy) or \ncesarean section delivery and all in-hospital postpartum care. More than \none delivery fee may not be billed for a mu ltiple birth (twins, triplets, etc.) \ndelivery, regardless of delivery method(s). Delivery fees include all \nprofessional services related to the hospitalization and delivery which are \nprovided by the physician; therefore, additional claims for physician's \nservices in the hospital such as hospital admission, may not be filed in \naddition to a claim for delivery or a claim for \"global\" care. \nEXCEPTION: When a physician's first and only encounter with the \nrecipient is for delivery (\"walk-in\" patient) he may bill for a hospital \nadmission (history and physical) in addition to delivery charges. \nPostpartum care includes office visits following vaginal or cesarean section \ndelivery for routine postpartum care wi thin 62 days post delivery. Additional \nclaims for routine visits during this time should not be filed. \nDelivery Only \nIf the physician performs the delivery only, he must utilize the appropriate \nCPT-4 delivery only code (vaginal deliver y only or C-section delivery only). \nMore than one delivery fee may not be billed for a multiple birth (twins, \ntriplets, etc.) delivery, regardless of the delivery method(s). Delivery fees \ninclude all professional services re lated to the hospitalization and delivery \nwhich are provided by the physician; therefore, additional claims for \nphysician's services in the hospital such as hospital admission, may not be \nfiled in addition to a claim for delivery only. \nEXCEPTION: When a physician's first and only encounter with the \nrecipient is for delivery (\"walk-in\" patient) he may bill for a hospital \nadmission (history and physical) in addition to delivery charges. \nUltrasounds \nObstetrical ultrasounds are limited to two per pregnancy. For patients \ncovered under the maternity care waiver, refer to Chapter 24, Maternity Care Program. Generally, first ultrasounds are conducted to detect \ngestational age, multiple pregnancies, and major malformations. Second \nultrasounds may be conducted to detect fetal growth disorders (intrauterine \ngrowth retardation, macrosomia) and anomalies that would appear later or \nmay have been unrecognizable in the earlier scan. \nAdditional ultrasounds may be prior approved by the Alabama Medicaid \nAgency if a patient's documented me dical condition meets any of the \nfollowing criteria: \n• Gestational diabetes with complications (Type 1 diabetes, vascular \ndisease, hypertension, elevated alpha -fetoprotein values, poor patient \ncompliance) \n• Failure to gain weight, evaluation of fetal growth \n• Pregnancy-induced hypertension \n• Vaginal bleeding of undetermined etiology \n• Coexisting adnexal mass \n• Abnormal amniotic fluid volume (polyhydramnios, oligohydramnios) Physician 28 \n October 2005 28-27 • Pregnant trauma patient \n• Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) \n• Monitoring for special tests such as fetoscopy, amniocentesis, or \ncervical cerclage placement \n• Assist in operations performed on the fetus in the uterus \n• Detection of fetal abnormalities with other indicators or risk factors \n(Low human chronic gonadotrophin (HCG) and high-unconjugated estriol (uE3) are predictive of an increased risk for Trisomy 18. \nEchogenic bowel grades 2 and 3 are indicative of an increased risk of \ncystic fibrosis and Trisomy 21) \n• Determination of fetal presentation \n• Suspected multiple gestation, serial evaluation of fetal growth in \nmultiple gestation \n• Suspected hydatidiform mole \n• Suspected fetal death \n• Suspected uterine abnormality \n• Suspected abrupt placenta \n• Follow-up evaluation of placental location for identified placenta previa \n• Maternity Care subcontractors shou ld contact the Primary Contractor \nfor information regarding obstetrical ultrasounds. \nTo determine if a procedure requires prior authorization, providers should \nuse the AVRS line at EDS, 1-800-727-7848. \n28.2.12 Vaccines For Children (VFC) \nThe Department of Public Health provides vaccines at no charge to Medicaid providers enrolled in the Vaccines For Children (VFC) Program as recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization. \nMedicaid reimburses administration fees for vaccines provided free of \ncharge through the VFC Program. The rate for the administration fee is $8.00; it is not the rate on the pricing file. Please refer to Appendix A, Well \nChild Check-Up, Section A.6.1 (Fees) for information regarding the use of \ndesignated VFC codes for billing immunization administration fee(s). \nA VFC provider may or may not choo se to become an enrolled Medicaid \nprovider. Enrollment as a VFC provider or a Medicaid provider is independent of each other. \nRefer to Appendix A, EPSDT, for procedure codes for VFC. \n28.2.13 Lab Services \nCollection of laboratory specimens may be billed only when sending \nspecimens to another site for analysis if the other site is not owned, \noperated, or financially associated with the site in which the specimen was \ncollected. The collection fee may not be billed if the lab work is done at the same site where the specimen was collected or in a lab owned, operated, \nor financially associated with the site in which the specimen was collected. \nPhysician \n28-28 October 2005 Providers will not be paid for and should not submit claims for laboratory \nwork done for them by independent laboratories or by hospital laboratories. \nProviders may submit claims for laborato ry work done by them in their own \noffices or own laboratory facilities. Providers who send specimens to \nindependent laboratories for analysis may bill a collection fee. This fee \nshall not be paid to any provider who has not actually extracted the \nspecimen from the patient. \nNOTE : \nProviders should use procedure code 36415-90 for routine venipuncture \ncollection, 36416-90 for collection of capillary blood specimen (e.g., finger, \nheal, ear stick) and Q0091-90 for collection of Pap smear specimen. \n \nRepeat Lab Procedures \nModifier 91 may be utilized to denote a repeat clinical laboratory test performed on the dame date of service for the same recipient. Providers \nshould use modifier 91 instead of modifier 76 for repeat lab procedures. \nNOTE : \nA physician CANNOT bill the following pathology/laboratory procedure \ncodes, however the above collection fee can be billed, if applicable: \n \n82775 Galactose – 1 – phosphate uridyl transferase; quantitative \n83498 Hydroxyprogesterone, 17 – d \n84030 Phenylalanine (PKU) blood \n84437 Thyroxine; total requiring elution (e.g., neonatal) \n28.2.14 Supply Code \nThe procedure code 99070 is utilized by physicians to bill for supplies and \nmaterials over and above those usually included with the office visit. \nExamples of supplies and materials over and beyond usual supplies \ninclude elastic wraps, disposable tubing for bronchial dilating equipment or \npost-operative dressing changes when no office visit is allowable. \n28.3 Prior Authorization and Referral Requirements \nMedical care and services that require prior authorization for in-state \nproviders will continue to require pr ior authorization for out-of-state \nproviders, e.g., organ transplants and select surgical procedures. Please \nrefer to Chapter 4, Obtaining Prior Authorization for more information. \nUnlisted services and procedure code s are not covered by the Alabama \nMedicaid Agency, with the exception of Medicare crossover claims and rare instances when approval is granted prior to service provision after the \nagency has determined that the serv ice is covered and that no other \nprocedure code exists for reimbursement. \n28.4 Cost Sharing (Copayment) \nThe copayment amount for physician office visit (including crossovers, and optometric) is $1.00 per visit. Copayment does not apply to services \nprovided for pregnant women, nursing facility residents, recipients less \nthan 18 years of age, emergencies, and family planning. Physician 28 \n October 2005 28-29 The provider may not deny services to any eligible Medicaid recipient \nbecause of the recipient’s inability to pay the cost-s haring (copayment) \namount imposed. \n28.5 Completing the Claim Form \nTo enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of Medicaid \nprocessing, providers should bill Medicaid claims electronically. \nPhysicians who bill Medicaid cl aims electronically receive the \nfollowing benefits: \n• Quicker claim processing turnaround \n• Immediate claim correction \n• Enhanced online adjustment functions \n• Improved access to e ligibility information \nRefer to Appendix B, Electronic Media Claims Guidelines, for more \ninformation about electronic filing. \nNOTE : \nWhen filing a claim on paper, a CMS-1500 claim form is required. \nMedicare-related claims must be filed using the Medical \nMedicaid/Medicare-related Claim Form. \nThis section describes program-specific claims information. Refer to \nChapter 5, Filing Claims, for general claims filing information and \ninstructions. \n28.5.1 Time Limit for Filing Claims \nMedicaid requires all claims for physicians to be filed within one year of the \ndate of service. Refer to Section 5.1. 5, Filing Limits, for more information \nregarding timely filing limits and exceptions. \n28.5.2 Diagnosis Codes \nThe International Classification of Diseases - 9th Revision - Clinical \nModification (ICD-9-CM) manual lists require d diagnosis codes. These \nmanuals may be obtained by contacting the American Medical Association, \nP.O. Box 10950, Chicago, IL 60610. \nNOTE : \nICD-9 diagnosis codes must be listed to the highest number of digits \npossible (3, 4, or 5 digits). Do not use decimal points in the diagnosis code \nfield. ¾Electronic \nclaims \nsubmission can save you \ntime and \nmoney. The system alerts \nyou to \ncommon errors and \nallows you to \ncorrect and resubmit \nclaims online. \nPhysician \n28-30 October 2005 \n28.5.3 Procedure Codes and Modifiers \nMedicaid uses the Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System \n(HCPCS). HCPCS is composed of the following: \n• American Medical Association’s Current Procedural Terminology \n(CPT) \n• Nationally assigned codes developed for Medicare \n• Locally assigned codes issued by M edicaid. Effective for dates of \nservice on or after 01/01/2004, use national codes. \nFiling Claims with Modifiers \nAppropriate use of CPT and HCPCs modifiers is required to differentiate \nbetween sites and procedures. It is necessary to append the appropriate \nanatomical modifiers to surgical codes to differentiate between multiple \nsurgeries and sites. \nAppropriate Use of Modifiers \nModifier 59 (Distinct Procedural Service) \n \nAccording to the CPT book, modifier 59 is described as being necessary to describe a distinct procedural service. This modifier should only be used to \nshow a distinct procedural serv ice when a comprehensive/component \ncoding pair is billed. Modifier 59 should not be billed to represent that multiple services of the same procedure code were performed. \n \nA comprehensive/coding pair occurs when one code is considered a component procedure and the other code is considered a comprehensive \nprocedure. These code pairs are frequently referred to as bundled codes \nthus meaning the component code is usually considered an integral part of the comprehensive code. Therefor e, in most instances the most \ncomprehensive code only should be billed and the component code should \nbe denied as rebundled or mutually exclusive. \nModifier 59 should only be used in conjunction with a \ncomprehensive/coding pair procedure when appropriately unbundling the \ncode pair. This modifier 59 should not be billed with the comprehensive \ncode. The component code can be unbundled, or allowed separately, in certain situations. If the two services are performed at two different times \nof day or the services are performed in two different anatomical sites, then \nmodifier 59 can be submitted with the component procedure code. \nIn order to communicate the special circumstances of the \ncomponent/comprehensive code pair unbundling, diagnoses codes and \nanatomical modifiers must be utilized as appropriate on the claim form. In \nsome cases, it may be necessary to a ttach a copy of the Operative Report \nto further explain the reason for the unbundling of code pairs. \n Modifier 59 should never be used in any other circumstances and is \nsubject to post payment review. If t he services performed and billed for a \ndate of service does not include a coding pair described above, then \nmodifier 59 is not valid or appropriate. Physician 28 \n October 2005 28-31 \nNOTE : \nModifier 59 is not to be used with Physician's Current Procedural \nTerminology (CPT) codes 99201-99499 or 77419-77430 . \n \nModifier 76 (Repeat Procedure) \n \nPrior to January 1, 2004, providers were advised to file multiple services \nwith modifiers Y2-Y9 and Z2-Z3 to avoid services being denied as duplicates. Since these modifiers have been eliminated, we are revising \ninstructions for filing multiple serv ices that are performed on the same \nday. . The appropriate use of CP T and HCPCS codes is required when \nfiling claims. In addition, diagnosis codes and modifiers should assist with \naccurately describing services b illed. It is necessary to append the \nappropriate anatomical modifiers to procedure codes to differentiate \nbetween multiple sites. If a claim drops for manual review, the \nappropriate use of diagnosis codes and modifiers may assist claim \nreviewers in determining the intent of billing without having to request \ndocumentation. As always, providers can continue to file modifiers RT \nand LT when two of the same procedure is performed and one is on the right side and one is on the left side of the body. However, if more than \none service is performed on the right or left side, services could be denied \nas duplicates if more than one RT or LT modifier is filed on the same procedure code. Modifier 76 is defin ed by the CPT as “Repeat Procedure \nby Same Physician”. Therefore, we are providing the following \ninstructions to educate providers on how to submit those services. \n \n1) If multiple services are performed, anatomical modifiers can be filed in \naddition to modifier 76 on the second line item. Anatomical modifiers are: LT, RT, E1-E4, F1-F9, FA, T1-T9, and TA. \n \nDate of Service Place Procedure Number of Services \n2/4/03-2/4/03 11 73580-RT 1 \n2/4/03-2/4/03 11 73580-RT76 1 \n2) If multiple services are performed, anatomical modifiers can be used \nwithout modifier 76. \nDate of Service Place Procedure Number of Services \n2/4/04-2/4/03 11 28820-T8 1 2/4/03-2/4/03 11 28820-TA 1 \n \nMultiple services (excluding most surg eries) can also be filed with multiple \nunits of service. Modifier 76 is defined as “repeat procedure by same \nphysician”. The Agency requires claims f iled with multiple units of service be \nsubmitted as shown below. \n \n3) The first line must be submitted with only one unit of service and the \nsecond line with modifier 76 can show the additional number of services that were performed that day. \n \nDate of Service Place Procedure Number of Services \n2/4/03-2/4/03 11 88305-TC 1 \n2/4/03-2/4/03 11 88305-TC76 3 \nPhysician \n28-32 October 2005 \nModifier 50 (Bilateral Procedures) \n \nModifier 50 represents a bilateral serv ice was performed. For example, if \nbilateral joint injections are administe red into the shoulders, the services \nshould be filed as follows: \n Date of Service Place Procedure Number of Services \n2/4/03-2/4/03 11 20610-50 1 \n There should be only one line item submitted with modifier 50, one unit of \nservice and a submitted amount to cover both procedures. The modifier 50 \ninstructs our system to pay for t he procedure with the highest allowed \namount and half of the allowed amount for each subsequent procedure. \n \nProcedure Codes \nThe CPT manual lists most procedure codes required by Medicaid. This \nmanual may be obtained by contacting the Order Department, American Medical Association, 515 North Stat e Street, Chicago, IL 60610-9986. The \n(837) Professional electronic claim and the paper claim have been modified \nto accept up to four Procedure Code Modifiers. \nNOTE: \nUnlisted procedure codes are not co vered by the Agency unless the \nprovider requested and received approval for a prior authorization before \nthe service is rendered. The Agency will deny all requests for payment of \nunlisted codes after the fact. \nPhysician-Employed Physician A ssistants (PA) and Certified \nRegistered Nurse Practitioners (CRNP) \nPayment will be made only for physician drugs identified in Appendix H, \nAlabama Medicaid Physician Drug List, CPT codes identified in Appendix O, \nCRNP and PA Services, and laboratory services, which are CLIA certified. \nEPSDT screenings will be covered only if the provider is enrolled in that \nprogram. Refer to Appendix A, EPSD T, for EPSDT program requirements. \nThe Physician's Assistant or CRNP can make physician required inpatient \nvisits to nursing facilities. However, physician required inpatient visits to \nhospitals or other institutional setti ngs cannot be made by a PA or CRNP. \nAlso, the PA or CRNP may provide low complexity or straightforward \nmedical decision-making services in the emergency room or assist at \nsurgery (identified surgical codes only) for Medicaid reimbursement. \n \nSurgical Procedure Codes Not Included in Global Surgical Package \n \nCertain relatively small surgical procedure codes formally designated in the \nCPT with an (*) may be billed in addition to an office visit. Additionally, \nthese codes do not carry the global surg ical package concept of inclusion of \npost-operative care within 62 days of the surgery. In the 2004 CPT \nguidelines the (*) designation has been removed. For reference, these \ncodes are listed below the covered services section in Chapter 28 of the Billing Manual. Physician 28 \n October 2005 28-33 Surgical Procedure Code Modifiers \nWhen submitting claims for procedures done on the same date of service, a \nmodifier is required to indicate that t he repeated service is not a duplicate. If \nthe same provider performs the repeat procedure, use modifier 76. \nFor repeat procedures done on t he same date of service by a different \nprovider, use modifier 77. Claims submitted for repeat procedures on the \nsame date of service without modifiers are denied as duplicate services. \nModifier Description \n76 Repeat Procedure By Same Physician. Modifier indicates a procedure of \nservice is repeated by the same phy sician subsequent to the original \nservice. This situation may be repor ted by adding modifier 76 to the five-\ndigit procedure code. \n77 Repeat Procedure By Another Physici an modifier indicates that a basic \nprocedure performed by another physician had to be repeated. This situation may be reported by adding modifier 77 to the five-digit \nprocedure code. \n59 Distinct procedural service modifier indicates that a service or procedure \nwas distinct or separate from other services performed on the same day. This may represent a different session or patient encounter, different \nprocedure or surgery, different site, s eparate lesion, or separate injury (or \narea of injury in extensive injuries). \n \n Procedure Codes \n10040 \n10060 \n10080 \n10120 \n10140 10160 \n11000 \n11200 11300 \n11305 \n11310 11730 \n11900 \n11901 12001 \n12002 \n12004 12011 \n12013 \n12031 12032 \n12041 \n12051 \n15786 \n16020 16025 \n17000 \n17110 17250 \n17260 36000 \n36405 \n36406 \n36410 \n36415 36440 \n36470 \n36471 36488 \n36489 \n36490 36491 \n36510 \n36600 36660 \n38300 \n40800 40804 \n41000 \n41005 41250 \n41251 \n41252 \n41800 \n42000 42300 \n42310 \n42320 42400 \n42650 58100 \n58300 \n58340 \n58350 \n59000 59020 \n59030 \n60000 61000 \n61001 \n61020 61026 \n61050 \n61055 61070 \n61105 \n61107 61210 \n62268 \n62269 62270 \n62272 \n62273 \n62280 \n62281 62282 \n62284 \n62290 62291 \n64400 \nPhysician \n28-34 October 2005 Procedure Codes \n17270 \n17280 \n17340 17360 \n17380 \n19000 19100 \n20000 \n20206 20500 \n20501 \n20520 20525 \n20550 \n20600 20605 \n20610 \n20650 20665 \n20670 \n21100 \n21315 \n21355 23700 \n24640 \n27086 27256 \n27257 \n27275 27605 \n27860 \n28001 28002 \n28190 \n28630 28635 \n28660 \n28665 30000 \n30020 \n30200 \n30210 \n30300 30560 \n30801 \n30901 30903 \n30905 \n30906 31000 \n31002 \n32000 32400 \n32420 42660 \n42700 \n43450 43760 \n45900 \n45905 45915 \n46030 \n46050 46080 \n46320 \n46900 46910 \n47000 \n48102 49080 \n49081 \n49180 49400 \n49420 \n50200 \n50390 \n50398 50688 \n51000 \n51005 51600 \n51700 \n51705 51710 \n53600 \n53601 53620 \n53621 \n53660 53661 \n54050 \n54055 54200 \n55000 \n55100 \n56405 \n56420 56605 \n56606 \n56720 57020 \n57100 \n57150 57160 \n57400 \n57410 57452 \n57454 64402 \n64405 \n64408 64410 \n64412 \n64413 64415 \n64417 \n64418 64420 \n64421 \n64425 64430 \n64435 \n64445 64450 \n64505 \n64508 64510 \n64520 \n64530 \n65205 \n65210 65220 \n65222 \n65270 65410 \n65430 \n65435 65800 \n65805 \n66030 67500 \n67515 \n67700 \n67710 \n67715 \n67810 67820 \n67825 \n67840 \n67850 \n68135 68200 \n68440 \n68801 68810 \n68840 \n68850 69000 \n69020 \n69420 69421 \n69433 Physician 28 \n October 2005 28-35 Procedure Codes \n32960 \n33010 \n33011 57500 \n57511 \n57800 \n \nProfessional and Technical Components \nSome procedure codes in the 70000, 80000, 90000, and G series are a \ncombination of a professional component and a technical component. \nTherefore, these codes may be billed one of three different ways; (1) as a global, (2) as a professional component, or (3) as a technical component. \nNOTE: Not all providers are allowed to bill any or all of the three ways to \nbill. Specific coverage questions should be addressed to the Provider \nAssistance Center. \n• Global , the provider must own the equipment, pay the technician, \nreview the results, and provide a wr itten report of the findings. The \nprocedure code is billed with no modifiers. The Global component \nshould be billed only for the following place of service locations: \n− 11 (Office) \n− 81 (Independent Laboratory) \n• Professional component , the provider does not\n own or operate the \nequipment. The provider reviews the results, and provides a written \nreport of the findings. The Radi ological professional component is \nbilled by adding modifier 26 to the procedure code, and should be billed only for the following place of service locations: \n− 21 (inpatient hospital) \n− 22 (outpatient hospital) \n− 23 (emergency room - hospital) \n− 51 (inpatient psychiatric facility) \n− 61 (comprehensive inpatient rehab facility) \n− 62 (comprehensive outpat ient rehab facility) \n− 65 (end-stage renal disease facility) \n− 81 (Independent Laboratory) \n• Technical component , the provider must own the equipment, but \ndoes not review and document the results. The technical component charges are the facility’s charges and are not billed separately by \nphysicians. The technical component is billed by adding modifier TC to \nthe procedure code. The technical component can only be billed by \nfacilities. \n28.5.4 Billing for Patient 1st Referred Service \nPlease refer to Chapter 39 for information regarding the Patient 1st \nProgram and Patient 1st referrals. Please refer to Chapter 5, Filing Claims, \nfor information regarding filing claims for a Patient 1st referral. \n \nPhysician \n28-36 October 2005 28.5.5 Place of Service Codes \nThe following place of service codes apply when filing claims for \nphysicians: \nPOS Description \n11 Office \n12 Home \n21 Inpatient Hospital \n22 Outpatient Hospital \n23 Emergency Room - Hospital \n24 Ambulatory Surgical Center \n25 Birthing Center \n26 Military Treatment Facility \n31 Skilled Nursing Facility or Nursing Facility \n32 Nursing Facility \n33 Custodial Care Facility \n34 Hospice \n41 Ambulance - Land \n42 Ambulance - Air or water \n51 Inpatient Psychiatric Facility \n52 Psy. Fac. Partial Hospitalization \n53 Community Mental Health Center \n54 Intermediate Care Fac./Mentally Retarded \n55 Residential Substance Abuse Treatment Facility \n56 Psychiatric Residential Treatment Center \n61 Comprehensive Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility \n62 Comprehensive Outpatient Rehabilitation Facility \n65 End Stage Renal Disease Treatment Facility \n71 State or Local Public Health Clinic \n72 Rural Health Clinic \n \n28.5.6 Required Attachments \nTo enhance the effectiveness and effici ency of Medicaid processing, your \nattachments should be limited to the following circumstances: \n• Claims With Third Party Denials \nNOTE : \nWhen an attachment is required, a hard copy CMS-1500 claim form \nmust be submitted. \nRefer to Section 5.7, Required Attachments, for more information on \nattachments. \n28.5.7 Consent Forms Required Before Payments \nCan Be Made \nNOTE : \nEDS will NOT pay any claims to ANY provider until a correctly \ncompleted original of the appropriate form is on file at EDS. Physician 28 \n October 2005 28-37 Abortions \nIn accordance with federal law, abortions are covered only (1) if the \npregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest; or (2) where a woman \nsuffers from a physical disorder, phy sical injury, or physical illness, \nincluding a life-endangering physical condition caused by or arising from \nthe pregnancy itself, that would, as certified by a physician, place the \nwoman in danger of death unless an abortion is performed. \nPlease refer to Appendix E, Medicaid Forms, for a copy of the PHY-96-2 \nCertification and Documentation for A bortion form, which is used when the \npregnancy is causing the life of the mother to be in danger. In the case of abortions performed secondary to pregnancies resulting from rape or \nincest, the documentation required is a letter from the recipient or provider \ncertifying that the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest. \n• The original copy of the PHY-96-2 form (for life of the mother in \ndanger) signed by the attending physi cian, or the certification letter \nregarding rape or incest, and a copy of the medical records (history and physical, operative report and discharge summary) must be \nsubmitted to EDS. \n• The second copy of the consent fo rm or certification letter must be \nplaced in the recipient’s medical record. \n• Copies of the consent form or certification letter may need to be \nprovided to hospital, laboratory or other providers as applicable in order for them to submit billing for their services. \nAll claims relating to abortions must have the above-specified \ndocumentation on file at EDS prior to payment. \n This documentation is not required when a recipient presents with a \nspontaneous abortion. \n \nIf the recipient does not qualify for paym ent by Medicaid and elects to have the \nabortion, providers may bill the recipient for the abortion as a non-covered \nservice. \nSterilization \nEDS must have on file the Medicaid-approved sterilization form. Refer to \nAppendix C, Family Planning, for more information. \nSterilization by Hysterectomy \nPayment is not available for a hysterectomy if: \n1. It was performed solely for the purpo se of rendering an individual permanently \nincapable of reproducing \n2. If there was more than one purpose to the procedure, it would not have been \nperformed but for the purpose of r endering the individual permanently \nincapable of reproducing \nHysterectomy procedures performed fo r the sole purpose of rendering an \nindividual incapable of reproducing are not covered under Medicaid. \nHysterectomies done as a medical nece ssity as treatment of disease can be \npaid for by the Medicaid funds under the physician's program. \nPhysician \n28-38 October 2005 \nNOTE : \nSterilization performed for the sole purpose of re ndering a person \npermanently incapable of reproducing is not available to persons under \ntwenty-one (21) years of age under the Medicaid Program. \nRefer to Appendix E, Medicaid Forms, for a sample of the sterilization form. \nHysterectomy \nThe hysterectomy consent form was recent ly revised. The form was revised to \ninclude a section for unusual circumstances. Now this form can be used by a \nphysician to certify a patient was alr eady sterile when the hysterectomy was \nperformed; a hysterectomy was perform ed under a life threatening situation; \nor a hysterectomy was performed under a period of retroactive Medicaid \neligibility. In all of these circumstance s, medical records mu st be forwarded to \nEDS along with the hysterectomy consent form and claim(s) in order for a \nState review to be performed. \nNOTE : \nThe doctor’s explanation to the patient that the operation will make her \nsterile and the doctor’s and recipient’s signature must precede the \noperation except in the ca se of medical emergency. \n \nIt is also important to note that certain fields on the hysterectomy consent form \nare non-correctable. T he non-correctable fields include the recipient’s \nsignature and date of signed informed consent, the provider’s signature and date of informed consent and the repr esentative’s signature and date of \ninformed consent (if the recipient requires a representative to sign for them). If \na non-correctable field is missing, contains invalid information or indicates the \nrecipient/representative or physician sig ned after the date of surgery, EDS will \ndeny the consent form. \nEDS must have on file a Medicaid- approved Hysterectomy Consent Form. \nThe revised hysterectomy consent form (form # PHY-81243) becomes \neffective January 1, 2004. Instructions for completing the consent form will be \non the back of the consent form. See Appendix E, Medicaid Forms, or visit our \nwebsite for a sample copy of this form. \nPlease note, only the surgeon should submit a hysterectomy consent form to \nEDS. All other providers should not requ est and submit copies of the consent \nform. Multiple copies slow down the consent form review and claims payment \nprocess. \nExceptions That Do Not Require Consent \nIf the following situations, the consent fo rm is not required. If consent is not \nrequired, the reason must be stated on the claim. \n1. The physician who performed the hyster ectomy certifies in writing that the \npatient was already sterile when the hysterectomy was performed; the cause \nof sterility must be stated in this written statement. Physician 28 \n October 2005 28-39 2. The physician who performed the hyster ectomy certifies in writing that the \nhysterectomy was performed under a lif e-threatening emergency situation in \nwhich prior acknowledgement was not possible. This written statement must \ninclude a description of the nature of the emergency. \n3. The hysterectomy was performed dur ing a period of retroactive Medicaid \neligibility, and the physician who perform ed the hysterectomy submits, in lieu \nof the consent form, a written statem ent certifying that the individual was \ninformed before the operation that the hy sterectomy would make her sterile. \nNOTE : \nMedicaid payment cannot be made for any claims for services \nprovided in connection with an abort ion, a sterilization procedure or a \nhysterectomy for medical reasons unless an approved consent form is \non file. Please be aware consent for sterilization is different from \nconsent for hysterectomy. See Appendix M, Medicaid Forms, for \nexamples of each. \n \n28.6 For More Information \nThis section contains a cross-referenc e to other relevant sections in the \nmanual. \nResource Where to Find It \nCMS-1500 Claim Filing Instructions Section 5.2 \nMedical Medicaid/Medicare-related Claim Filing Instructions Section 5.6.1 \nAnesthesiology Chapter 38 \nEPSDT Appendix A \nElectronic Media Claims (EMC) Submission \nGuidelines Appendix B \nFamily Planning Appendix C \nAlabama Medicaid Injectable Drug List Appendix H \nAVRS Quick Reference Guide Appendix L \nAlabama Medicaid Contact Information Appendix N \nCRNP and PA Services Appendix O \n \nPhysician \n28-40 October 2005 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \nThis page is intentionally left blank. "
} |
[
-0.10725928097963333,
0.025945745408535004,
0.10477668046951294,
-0.03400309011340141,
0.028998086228966713,
0.003967645578086376,
-0.00442654499784112,
-0.01525109726935625,
-0.1092577651143074,
0.06826361268758774,
-0.08101347833871841,
0.05431651696562767,
0.021243112161755562,
-0.018928026780486107,
-0.04449089616537094,
0.04697387292981148,
-0.012536161579191685,
-0.044728659093379974,
-0.05806789919734001,
0.10631650686264038,
-0.0658998042345047,
-0.05794409662485123,
-0.04686814174056053,
0.04415496066212654,
0.024288341403007507,
0.055575691163539886,
-0.04547824710607529,
0.024297844618558884,
-0.1329849362373352,
-0.0238052811473608,
0.04576976224780083,
0.011243345215916634,
0.017800280824303627,
0.06578730791807175,
0.0562235452234745,
0.020084479823708534,
0.0569014735519886,
0.06602130085229874,
0.0500430203974247,
0.004389576613903046,
0.019498584792017937,
0.02006297931075096,
-0.015263977460563183,
0.024753423407673836,
-0.07516028732061386,
0.02527661621570587,
0.02713586576282978,
0.02071477845311165,
0.03323831036686897,
-0.013713239692151546,
-0.048845577985048294,
-0.01674385741353035,
0.025554906576871872,
0.02207004278898239,
0.05048563703894615,
-0.08306664973497391,
0.004761857446283102,
0.07427797466516495,
-0.002832207130268216,
-0.03873870149254799,
0.04546733945608139,
0.0014885974815115333,
-0.08996962010860443,
0.025844460353255272,
0.035258106887340546,
0.007197718136012554,
-0.027123158797621727,
0.028365779668092728,
0.016652727499604225,
-0.049287233501672745,
0.0066847121343016624,
0.10100895911455154,
0.01697305217385292,
0.011227120645344257,
0.04010589420795441,
0.004576299339532852,
-0.04970140382647514,
0.0074750566855072975,
0.09089703112840652,
-0.00748430285602808,
-0.020834630355238914,
0.02764422632753849,
-0.06265357881784439,
0.05202513933181763,
0.05308336019515991,
-0.02319265529513359,
0.010584373958408833,
0.044952161610126495,
0.05821680650115013,
-0.06113776937127113,
-0.043309491127729416,
0.030576184391975403,
0.10632559657096863,
-0.035676050931215286,
0.0004036437894683331,
0.07301352173089981,
0.03206067532300949,
0.0012668233830481768,
-0.09383492171764374,
0.08264019340276718,
-0.022957466542720795,
0.02372295968234539,
0.03870070353150368,
-0.12333136796951294,
-0.017689449712634087,
-0.025201890617609024,
-0.05595972388982773,
0.09852577745914459,
-0.084260493516922,
-0.09567509591579437,
0.06668603420257568,
0.029246389865875244,
-0.02364213950932026,
0.019348572939634323,
0.060690317302942276,
0.012199466116726398,
0.008163447491824627,
-0.04957176744937897,
0.04235900193452835,
-0.030779395252466202,
-0.06894554197788239,
-0.07422687858343124,
-0.08468380570411682,
-0.03618299216032028,
0.02037428691983223,
0.017736122012138367,
-0.013908352702856064,
-1.1359501698476488e-33,
-0.03983050584793091,
0.0427105538547039,
0.020813755691051483,
0.02742600627243519,
0.0042121694423258305,
0.0028048132080584764,
0.004336623474955559,
-0.053533658385276794,
0.008640620857477188,
0.016299346461892128,
0.05974842235445976,
0.034050632268190384,
0.08952660858631134,
-0.013184187933802605,
-0.02441815845668316,
-0.0950271487236023,
-0.00006784671131754294,
-0.002132649067789316,
-0.06721034646034241,
-0.03505539521574974,
0.052120085805654526,
-0.04154153913259506,
0.03287854790687561,
-0.023862285539507866,
0.02553640864789486,
-0.03253636136651039,
0.07114112377166748,
-0.039245788007974625,
0.09646774083375931,
0.020686011761426926,
-0.004590737167745829,
0.07135763764381409,
-0.009665275923907757,
0.10671593248844147,
-0.08053030073642731,
-0.04070863127708435,
-0.01122320257127285,
-0.06625581532716751,
0.05558546632528305,
-0.08051946759223938,
-0.06356066465377808,
0.0371728353202343,
-0.012197742238640785,
0.03454326465725899,
0.061894163489341736,
0.0597010962665081,
0.10149867087602615,
0.00484948605298996,
0.008909647352993488,
-0.01633470691740513,
0.053790733218193054,
0.06930278986692429,
-0.0230263564735651,
-0.033725958317518234,
-0.0849701315164566,
-0.08446497470140457,
-0.03394557908177376,
-0.023970795795321465,
0.05642709136009216,
0.01025635376572609,
0.03397570177912712,
-0.04829026386141777,
0.009180649183690548,
-0.03875035420060158,
-0.017177527770400047,
-0.09348120540380478,
-0.13280612230300903,
-0.05378240719437599,
0.04952690750360489,
-0.03290296718478203,
0.002726425649598241,
-0.09520111232995987,
0.016897054389119148,
0.07669801265001297,
-0.1090814620256424,
0.024176832288503647,
-0.011817635968327522,
-0.026517849415540695,
-0.011389372870326042,
-0.05154109746217728,
-0.03854994475841522,
-0.03872670978307724,
0.021502306684851646,
-0.006800615228712559,
0.019136235117912292,
-0.03872540220618248,
0.03823819011449814,
0.05801497399806976,
-0.05369776114821434,
0.018858354538679123,
-0.046391457319259644,
-0.07052154839038849,
0.07918144762516022,
0.02443777024745941,
0.04863257333636284,
-1.0566439741014847e-33,
-0.03358962759375572,
-0.06717341393232346,
-0.03058733232319355,
-0.022961078211665154,
0.05123189464211464,
0.03788559138774872,
-0.02569003216922283,
-0.06771715730428696,
0.04107170179486275,
-0.0051034437492489815,
-0.006361423525959253,
0.01754050888121128,
-0.007738232146948576,
0.14179261028766632,
-0.028223300352692604,
-0.042536910623311996,
0.10714802891016006,
-0.013473470695316792,
0.009236889891326427,
0.008190182037651539,
-0.025262661278247833,
0.03975707292556763,
-0.07768882066011429,
0.12324835360050201,
-0.003408711403608322,
0.02502725087106228,
0.004713717382401228,
-0.06893730163574219,
0.00557721545919776,
0.07425593584775925,
-0.05200386419892311,
-0.014924867078661919,
-0.000026989520847564563,
0.10592009872198105,
0.008586791343986988,
0.01148171816021204,
0.04060807824134827,
-0.13924650847911835,
-0.012778326869010925,
-0.000005335609785106499,
0.058140143752098083,
-0.0797571912407875,
0.007928273640573025,
0.004747137892991304,
-0.02143057808279991,
-0.010903243906795979,
-0.06233176216483116,
0.05768335238099098,
-0.09656929969787598,
0.0861741453409195,
-0.02615983411669731,
0.02699027769267559,
0.006191320717334747,
-0.07202784717082977,
0.030773935839533806,
0.01798631250858307,
0.07030101865530014,
-0.0424669124186039,
-0.02358349971473217,
0.00273585831746459,
-0.11497829854488373,
0.039275433868169785,
0.024304894730448723,
-0.04891781881451607,
0.06745927780866623,
0.0036016718950122595,
-0.05944948270916939,
-0.07822783291339874,
0.048327308148145676,
-0.009780666790902615,
0.0616462342441082,
-0.026801688596606255,
-0.07056131213903427,
-0.022541524842381477,
0.08470403403043747,
0.018153972923755646,
0.008288267068564892,
-0.014294127933681011,
-0.10289041697978973,
0.03056020848453045,
0.06014591082930565,
-0.04434856399893761,
-0.03190857917070389,
-0.1064663976430893,
0.025223663076758385,
0.05531072989106178,
0.04911835864186287,
-0.02272460050880909,
-0.023117292672395706,
0.007307514548301697,
-0.1423383206129074,
-0.05607404559850693,
-0.017445215955376625,
0.01930452696979046,
0.04913018271327019,
-3.2332579280591744e-8,
0.07918208837509155,
-0.0121731823310256,
0.025726789608597755,
0.10546088963747025,
-0.04913086071610451,
0.0077062067575752735,
0.004376421216875315,
0.023423217236995697,
-0.03434376418590546,
0.027402132749557495,
0.07041288912296295,
0.03358330577611923,
0.021144596859812737,
0.012066269293427467,
-0.0032162154093384743,
-0.09091591835021973,
-0.06922450661659241,
0.07713598757982254,
-0.11378831416368484,
0.018216118216514587,
0.006114297546446323,
0.035806842148303986,
-0.030844569206237793,
0.057321805506944656,
0.0175317469984293,
0.059124983847141266,
0.02173369564116001,
0.016034578904509544,
0.0033978235442191362,
0.01554370578378439,
-0.01383054070174694,
-0.03048693574965,
0.011132861487567425,
0.03630240261554718,
0.003338354406878352,
-0.025638345628976822,
-0.06375392526388168,
0.04947338253259659,
0.05149504169821739,
-0.05158533155918121,
-0.000049141472118208185,
0.033470623195171356,
-0.013300755061209202,
0.0037521158810704947,
-0.04704387113451958,
-0.0044349259696900845,
-0.05013610050082207,
-0.005957837216556072,
0.029571086168289185,
0.021074358373880386,
-0.027304407209157944,
0.03919626772403717,
0.009456918574869633,
0.04862794652581215,
0.03237094357609749,
0.0034738793037831783,
-0.0323428176343441,
-0.03836265206336975,
0.016998331993818283,
0.06263633817434311,
-0.0218756515532732,
0.02332897111773491,
-0.09315710514783859,
0.04109925404191017
] | {
"pdf_file": "MPUN74DDVBAVSA7JIRU4DMDJLPPONVRQ.pdf",
"text": "Have an idea to fix Washington?\nHave an idea or comment on how to fix the broken system in Washington, please e-mail me. \nWe are interested in your thoughts on how to break throught the partisan gridlock that has\nplagued Washington. E-mail: fixwashington@mail.house.gov\n \n 1 / 1"
} |
[
-0.0008847525459714234,
-0.05831870436668396,
-0.03707612305879593,
-0.061724547296762466,
-0.020105110481381416,
-0.08010753989219666,
-0.027324747294187546,
0.049818091094493866,
0.0020389328710734844,
-0.023898979648947716,
0.06783198565244675,
-0.016233287751674652,
-0.014578965492546558,
-0.053419001400470734,
-0.035490941256284714,
-0.05685374513268471,
0.007767367642372847,
-0.04934919998049736,
-0.0072435857728123665,
-0.03315587714314461,
0.001883954624645412,
-0.03437668830156326,
-0.039896268397569656,
-0.029212497174739838,
0.048552121967077255,
0.016126036643981934,
-0.02068193256855011,
0.0877971276640892,
-0.04233450070023537,
-0.08999743312597275,
-0.030976155772805214,
0.13220421969890594,
0.10485053807497025,
0.027056511491537094,
0.013586992397904396,
-0.01229106541723013,
-0.04449930414557457,
-0.06652767211198807,
-0.032653309404850006,
0.004844154696911573,
0.025512944906949997,
-0.06252355873584747,
0.033311594277620316,
0.011002697981894016,
-0.023444149643182755,
-0.02223842777311802,
-0.09366075694561005,
-0.03328503668308258,
0.013059538789093494,
-0.0009020795696415007,
-0.03909407556056976,
0.06693638861179352,
-0.01928061991930008,
0.024397652596235275,
-0.024143222719430923,
0.03467767313122749,
-0.03994211554527283,
-0.000629440532065928,
0.08471322059631348,
0.033106204122304916,
-0.021976256743073463,
0.047285258769989014,
-0.11085690557956696,
-0.0018812553025782108,
0.019999917596578598,
0.03348980098962784,
-0.02545243129134178,
-0.017950614914298058,
0.015162353403866291,
0.04787106439471245,
-0.09252512454986572,
0.038742199540138245,
-0.0015199659392237663,
0.07077696174383163,
-0.04301118478178978,
0.02746465429663658,
0.023608148097991943,
-0.10183213651180267,
-0.040860239416360855,
-0.0680851936340332,
-0.08349188417196274,
-0.07823123037815094,
-0.02444884553551674,
0.01768024079501629,
0.049060892313718796,
0.02958044782280922,
0.034735120832920074,
0.05591964349150658,
-0.04137536510825157,
-0.07345830649137497,
-0.016567077487707138,
0.027666766196489334,
-0.05737781897187233,
0.026048734784126282,
-0.03527821972966194,
0.08713763952255249,
-0.014192966744303703,
0.010802077129483223,
-0.038569990545511246,
0.09124556928873062,
0.018053755164146423,
0.016388840973377228,
-0.054232317954301834,
0.03476738929748535,
-0.08706933259963989,
-0.02648276649415493,
0.04180797189474106,
0.10901191830635071,
-0.029654275625944138,
-0.02419075183570385,
-0.025653105229139328,
0.038778744637966156,
0.09417305886745453,
-0.1255914270877838,
0.0037319259718060493,
0.04285585507750511,
-0.027910416945815086,
0.06280309706926346,
0.09816381335258484,
0.03672228753566742,
0.06559382379055023,
-0.04096641018986702,
-0.000031360978027805686,
0.020673980936408043,
-0.0291355699300766,
0.013398075476288795,
0.08582893013954163,
8.984755153975841e-33,
0.04884754493832588,
0.02235802635550499,
0.008349438197910786,
-0.05898866429924965,
0.025814706459641457,
0.019198551774024963,
-0.0935710072517395,
0.048526518046855927,
-0.02276783622801304,
0.04442045837640762,
-0.039871882647275925,
-0.013451757840812206,
-0.06915052980184555,
-0.09785343706607819,
0.046035394072532654,
-0.060207221657037735,
0.0295640230178833,
0.02784758433699608,
-0.13183097541332245,
0.03874290734529495,
0.005873591639101505,
-0.04712706804275513,
-0.027564184740185738,
-0.02752198465168476,
0.031941160559654236,
0.06788269430398941,
0.048738181591033936,
0.020500244572758675,
-0.011872589588165283,
0.0361701138317585,
0.009630316868424416,
-0.02711411751806736,
-0.0920080691576004,
-0.0006374207441695035,
0.024659298360347748,
0.01147677656263113,
-0.08309321850538254,
0.01171866524964571,
-0.0202903151512146,
-0.03690999373793602,
-0.039571501314640045,
0.026177749037742615,
-0.059198252856731415,
-0.009134010411798954,
0.024826254695653915,
-0.011021587066352367,
-0.003348669270053506,
-0.005173560697585344,
0.04713427647948265,
0.049667857587337494,
-0.024301636964082718,
0.0018475736724212766,
0.0036250113043934107,
-0.008405334316194057,
0.018924400210380554,
0.05902380123734474,
0.11270032823085785,
0.011481350287795067,
-0.010501326993107796,
0.10397815704345703,
0.04405641183257103,
0.10268963873386383,
0.017233731225132942,
-0.10819000750780106,
-0.00700150104239583,
0.01935507170855999,
-0.009640657342970371,
-0.050533756613731384,
0.002511135768145323,
0.0068350560031831264,
-0.044358544051647186,
-0.03118721954524517,
0.07694113254547119,
0.009011724963784218,
0.03405505046248436,
-0.013440897688269615,
0.02250266633927822,
-0.003205728717148304,
-0.00024927285267040133,
-0.02758043073117733,
-0.02181444875895977,
-0.03164638578891754,
-0.002151794033125043,
-0.08001115918159485,
-0.05380162224173546,
-0.055874377489089966,
-0.016621630638837814,
-0.011921988800168037,
-0.09109071642160416,
0.027828119695186615,
-0.12382902950048447,
0.031660374253988266,
-0.03451208770275116,
-0.03208012506365776,
-0.07337489724159241,
-9.379497911925473e-33,
-0.0217553973197937,
0.05738991126418114,
0.006501547060906887,
0.04437512904405594,
-0.05783683806657791,
-0.02533484809100628,
0.07279793173074722,
0.08871112018823624,
0.10148373991250992,
0.10439252853393555,
0.07503144443035126,
-0.048801127821207047,
-0.009106787852942944,
-0.15690264105796814,
0.08803518861532211,
0.016210418194532394,
0.01567700505256653,
-0.026878565549850464,
-0.04262610524892807,
0.031062453985214233,
0.023182589560747147,
0.12261160463094711,
-0.03194630891084671,
0.04600152373313904,
0.0193337332457304,
0.0468452125787735,
0.06591549515724182,
0.05444866791367531,
-0.04325399175286293,
-0.03966880217194557,
-0.001640414702706039,
-0.0590936504304409,
-0.03606032952666283,
0.11786996573209763,
-0.04932298883795738,
0.012688995338976383,
0.06247755140066147,
0.07693071663379669,
-0.06234699860215187,
-0.024428987875580788,
0.06022962927818298,
0.04767842963337898,
-0.0015813655918464065,
0.0015341084217652678,
-0.04375381022691727,
-0.009304947219789028,
0.03214505314826965,
-0.06130433455109596,
-0.03271765634417534,
0.0005957243265584111,
0.012945729307830334,
-0.011278471909463406,
-0.02943328209221363,
0.06617055833339691,
0.02289770357310772,
-0.008961106650531292,
0.003622492076829076,
-0.010622403584420681,
-0.0509924441576004,
-0.03476276621222496,
0.08300399035215378,
-0.020879797637462616,
-0.025019275024533272,
-0.04430278018116951,
0.05356454476714134,
-0.04498802125453949,
0.05172714963555336,
-0.031021935865283012,
0.003822485450655222,
0.01731591299176216,
0.027416780591011047,
0.00681523559615016,
-0.0457855649292469,
-0.06004221737384796,
0.026544060558080673,
0.016536397859454155,
-0.057124871760606766,
0.05368936061859131,
-0.08348926901817322,
-0.046534452587366104,
-0.06531315296888351,
-0.01750347390770912,
-0.0418943352997303,
0.12290103733539581,
-0.07209469377994537,
0.06234963238239288,
0.021941466256976128,
0.05015818774700165,
0.04547325521707535,
-0.008984359912574291,
0.007044213358312845,
0.05630301684141159,
-0.04229189082980156,
0.046367473900318146,
-0.013229484669864178,
-5.3524239262969786e-8,
-0.012926679104566574,
-0.056581903249025345,
-0.040972039103507996,
-0.007354794070124626,
0.012454957701265812,
-0.0811111181974411,
-0.012919362634420395,
-0.03605745732784271,
-0.049815014004707336,
-0.02893754281103611,
0.11366820335388184,
-0.015129619278013706,
-0.08252349495887756,
-0.06530002504587173,
0.05989299714565277,
-0.04606587439775467,
-0.025327086448669434,
0.07971803098917007,
-0.03635082021355629,
-0.03288139030337334,
0.068130724132061,
0.03714270144701004,
0.1093006283044815,
-0.012442423962056637,
-0.016299357637763023,
0.03665513917803764,
0.0009171225246973336,
0.03460584953427315,
0.03377391770482063,
-0.011903148144483566,
0.03565838932991028,
-0.030903156846761703,
0.01755383051931858,
-0.1296873390674591,
-0.005301223136484623,
0.04549996927380562,
-0.1010981947183609,
0.06771892309188843,
0.043715037405490875,
0.10615745931863785,
-0.025015784427523613,
-0.02728215418756008,
-0.07374997437000275,
0.08375471830368042,
0.015818245708942413,
-0.005902259144932032,
0.002525856252759695,
0.018684158101677895,
0.04732853174209595,
-0.09554792940616608,
-0.013034642674028873,
-0.022220931947231293,
-0.0317554734647274,
-0.12152937054634094,
-0.03494122996926308,
-0.00596227589994669,
0.013287766836583614,
-0.01612810231745243,
-0.03468925878405571,
-0.021211301907896996,
0.07263397425413132,
-0.009746178984642029,
-0.08217950910329819,
0.003999934997409582
] | {
"pdf_file": "LDLCDEPVQ225ADIF33NSEBYX3Z3AE4TX.pdf",
"text": "03:00 06:00 09:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 21:000100200300pitch angle (deg)Quality Check N19 2015−01−01\n \nted_alpha_0_sat ted_alpha_30_sat\n03:00 06:00 09:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 21:00−50150350550750deg or km\n \naltlatlon\n03:00 06:00 09:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 21:0010−410−310−210−1100mW/m2−str\n \nted_ele_tel0_hi_eflux ted_ele_tel0_low_eflux ted_ele_tel30_hi_eflux ted_ele_tel30_low_eflux\n03:00 06:00 09:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 21:0010−410−310−210−1100mW/m2−str\n \nted_ele_eflux_bg_tel0_hi ted_ele_eflux_bg_tel0_low ted_ele_eflux_bg_tel30_hi ted_ele_eflux_bg_tel30_low\n03:00 06:00 09:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 21:0010−410−310−210−1100mW/m2−str\n \nted_pro_tel0_hi_eflux ted_pro_tel0_low_eflux ted_pro_tel30_hi_eflux ted_pro_tel30_low_eflux\n03:00 06:00 09:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 21:0010−410−310−210−1100mW/m2−str\n \nted_pro_eflux_bg_tel0_hi ted_pro_eflux_bg_tel0_low ted_pro_eflux_bg_tel30_hi ted_pro_eflux_bg_tel30_low\n03:00 06:00 09:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 21:0010−410−310−210−1100mW/m2\n \nted_ele_eflux_atmo_low ted_ele_eflux_atmo_hi ted_ele_eflux_atmo_total\n03:00 06:00 09:00 12:00 15:00 18:00 21:0010−410−310−210−1100mW/m2\n \nted_pro_eflux_atmo_low ted_pro_eflux_atmo_hi ted_pro_eflux_atmo_total"
} |
[
-0.009950059466063976,
-0.0042724329978227615,
-0.022080926224589348,
0.06095366179943085,
-0.054670549929142,
0.11802522093057632,
-0.038313210010528564,
-0.059674222022295,
0.01949838362634182,
-0.032337818294763565,
-0.05756860598921776,
-0.021181633695960045,
-0.015099222771823406,
-0.0451449416577816,
-0.02209196239709854,
0.020511379465460777,
0.13462328910827637,
0.022115979343652725,
-0.02354973927140236,
0.0038717789575457573,
0.03703576326370239,
0.025184031575918198,
-0.014252383261919022,
-0.004877420607954264,
0.06161569058895111,
-0.04210486263036728,
-0.08751869201660156,
-0.046618372201919556,
-0.05069342255592346,
-0.04842393100261688,
0.006791447289288044,
-0.005237766541540623,
0.0021321433596313,
-0.04770644009113312,
0.10854709148406982,
0.048591285943984985,
0.015356914140284061,
-0.004183502867817879,
-0.0284101702272892,
0.08421336859464645,
-0.03357090801000595,
0.03232363238930702,
-0.08639218658208847,
0.003065539291128516,
-0.03522005304694176,
0.021883061155676842,
0.003165886038914323,
-0.010797246359288692,
-0.12225646525621414,
0.0839129090309143,
0.013509286567568779,
-0.032507579773664474,
0.0007929085986688733,
0.03088751621544361,
-0.0415249839425087,
-0.012653622776269913,
0.06089237332344055,
-0.013434343039989471,
0.0014903100673109293,
0.05945300683379173,
-0.07333607971668243,
0.01769428141415119,
0.03850838541984558,
-0.0026190413627773523,
0.026268187910318375,
0.013373937457799911,
-0.06506138294935226,
-0.08608638495206833,
-0.02568962238729,
-0.14515216648578644,
0.044953178614377975,
-0.05379251390695572,
-0.00011846435518236831,
-0.03905966877937317,
0.13043630123138428,
0.023395949974656105,
-0.014090207405388355,
0.07336024940013885,
0.1259966790676117,
-0.2002372145652771,
0.05053308233618736,
-0.026824751868844032,
-0.002711937529966235,
0.028661957010626793,
0.038792382925748825,
0.0012726662680506706,
0.012034728191792965,
-0.03815066069364548,
0.08935049176216125,
0.03566946089267731,
0.1178569495677948,
0.00040055139106698334,
-0.00016124117246363312,
-0.07519350945949554,
0.046113673597574234,
0.018409714102745056,
-0.007978447712957859,
-0.011254997923970222,
0.022488482296466827,
0.025953317061066628,
0.008825541473925114,
-0.08334274590015411,
-0.01988239586353302,
-0.040324024856090546,
0.009572847746312618,
-0.007936179637908936,
0.0514344684779644,
0.022070055827498436,
-0.05301504582166672,
0.008221731521189213,
0.052914805710315704,
0.00010221968113910407,
0.018243931233882904,
0.022450057789683342,
0.08909910917282104,
0.03268333151936531,
-0.07201069593429565,
0.03222081810235977,
0.12306121736764908,
-0.0535743311047554,
-0.015047079883515835,
0.023953091353178024,
0.042880017310380936,
-0.040415145456790924,
-0.02597961761057377,
0.02657514624297619,
-0.14952431619167328,
3.368228084725581e-33,
0.0764143168926239,
0.04383980855345726,
0.024109845981001854,
-0.03269750252366066,
-0.013511674478650093,
-0.07238104939460754,
0.027320612221956253,
0.025737781077623367,
0.007119166664779186,
-0.020375654101371765,
-0.00274215848185122,
0.06417087465524673,
0.02759680710732937,
0.053906504064798355,
-0.03117012418806553,
-0.003447167342528701,
-0.04670841619372368,
0.03200986608862877,
0.028543980792164803,
0.0739452913403511,
0.006282845512032509,
-0.07077953219413757,
-0.0031283062417060137,
0.052215445786714554,
0.003811261150985956,
0.06827723234891891,
-0.1003323346376419,
-0.005833534058183432,
-0.02735394425690174,
0.015889788046479225,
-0.03679278865456581,
-0.016421400010585785,
0.158863827586174,
-0.053930170834064484,
-0.028557684272527695,
-0.03544602170586586,
-0.0075149438343942165,
0.013003304600715637,
-0.032997015863657,
-0.00010866628144867718,
0.015333868563175201,
0.05726015940308571,
0.016723250970244408,
0.002917693927884102,
-0.029793784022331238,
0.06741559505462646,
0.1268845498561859,
0.03998224064707756,
-0.00984850525856018,
0.04809539020061493,
0.009948564693331718,
0.03506138175725937,
0.014402750879526138,
0.009959488175809383,
0.005011239554733038,
-0.10917731374502182,
0.024816524237394333,
0.02658337540924549,
0.02540688030421734,
-0.10480590164661407,
0.04120737314224243,
0.07397139817476273,
-0.020882103592157364,
0.060818031430244446,
0.01016165129840374,
0.026410827413201332,
0.024771982803940773,
0.04005924239754677,
0.07382449507713318,
-0.11288845539093018,
-0.06621146202087402,
0.005157125182449818,
0.026004448533058167,
0.022630605846643448,
-0.028527401387691498,
-0.07415668666362762,
0.020311223343014717,
-0.036411624401807785,
0.04671812430024147,
0.03170989081263542,
-0.07483755797147751,
0.007443225011229515,
0.0585845410823822,
-0.07188715040683746,
0.055856768041849136,
-0.042732372879981995,
0.08252259343862534,
0.021104395389556885,
-0.0011935755610466003,
-0.0696578174829483,
0.13320262730121613,
-0.03286026790738106,
-0.012750429101288319,
0.04344839230179787,
0.06123240292072296,
-3.984950461200525e-33,
0.023514406755566597,
0.03443920984864235,
-0.004521193914115429,
-0.022956514731049538,
0.006126148626208305,
-0.038521066308021545,
-0.0010715272510424256,
-0.05633125826716423,
0.09007290750741959,
-0.06295929849147797,
0.042217522859573364,
-0.10525168478488922,
-0.0387771837413311,
-0.015789082273840904,
0.0008469332242384553,
-0.12902335822582245,
-0.0851852297782898,
0.03841986507177353,
0.0071262819692492485,
0.022661428898572922,
0.026013052091002464,
0.0490768738090992,
0.002512569772079587,
-0.011388720944523811,
-0.007182529661804438,
0.024696189910173416,
-0.07244326919317245,
-0.014172096736729145,
0.029489148408174515,
0.005860152654349804,
-0.002362813102081418,
-0.05482765659689903,
-0.08898540586233139,
0.05995989218354225,
-0.04433257132768631,
-0.0930500254034996,
0.02799723856151104,
-0.04066934436559677,
-0.0356965996325016,
0.03721190616488457,
0.04626389965415001,
-0.02743234671652317,
0.021217480301856995,
0.14730919897556305,
-0.029403897002339363,
0.02049778774380684,
-0.011097962968051434,
-0.010353227145969868,
-0.04853476211428642,
-0.02108819968998432,
-0.05245332792401314,
-0.10721185058355331,
-0.040590401738882065,
0.0015071944799274206,
-0.007303979247808456,
0.014535068534314632,
0.10137423127889633,
0.016082892194390297,
0.0016470440896227956,
0.02742801420390606,
0.01799902133643627,
0.0620247907936573,
-0.009008928202092648,
0.00889583770185709,
-0.002378669334575534,
0.03903524950146675,
0.0008537719259038568,
-0.020610596984624863,
0.008306127041578293,
-0.005381434224545956,
-0.00164499890524894,
-0.056303877383470535,
0.023358812555670738,
-0.0015858813421800733,
-0.06116098910570145,
0.011305787600576878,
0.04508054256439209,
0.03029175102710724,
0.024074511602520943,
-0.008006521500647068,
-0.11094408482313156,
-0.06003472954034805,
-0.007014180533587933,
-0.05199538171291351,
0.04353896155953407,
0.04364888370037079,
0.012907886877655983,
-0.06311485171318054,
-0.002271493198350072,
0.09996730089187622,
-0.0516359843313694,
-0.023257657885551453,
0.09127507358789444,
0.062172822654247284,
0.010486497543752193,
-5.386145573993417e-8,
0.009151960723102093,
0.04107723385095596,
-0.0518493577837944,
0.01388080045580864,
0.10149556398391724,
-0.01803317479789257,
-0.053270138800144196,
0.0309909638017416,
-0.015180009417235851,
0.029188690707087517,
0.023471271619200706,
-0.015928389504551888,
0.05022568628191948,
-0.06888267397880554,
-0.018168561160564423,
-0.052819304168224335,
0.016602884978055954,
0.021392805501818657,
-0.02968541719019413,
-0.0846240371465683,
-0.07189424335956573,
-0.0346897728741169,
0.0056931693106889725,
-0.01690409705042839,
-0.06578057259321213,
-0.06884776055812836,
-0.03555098921060562,
0.08294098824262619,
0.01638069935142994,
-0.04009440913796425,
0.005451371427625418,
0.0424673855304718,
0.02122322842478752,
-0.03311420977115631,
0.040243230760097504,
-0.04606311768293381,
-0.06817372143268585,
-0.011985342018306255,
0.030469071120023727,
0.08192568272352219,
-0.033610738813877106,
0.0035616408567875624,
-0.012544243596494198,
-0.020060816779732704,
0.07516776025295258,
-0.0070264204405248165,
-0.09120696783065796,
-0.0827195793390274,
0.04482882097363472,
-0.015800027176737785,
-0.0055924225598573685,
-0.03254752978682518,
-0.03731108456850052,
0.013532822951674461,
0.046548474580049515,
-0.03068489208817482,
0.010742051526904106,
0.03931666165590286,
-0.03919486328959465,
0.03830866143107414,
-0.03441032022237778,
-0.03859572857618332,
0.020409628748893738,
-0.06176112964749336
] | {
"pdf_file": "NKTXPVJPY5TFHGLN3JTGGFE7R6KEJJI4.pdf",
"text": "Commission on the Arts\nBill Number & Chapter:\nPROGRAM DESCRIPTION: The Commission on the Arts helps provide high quality arts experiences for all Idahoans by providing \nmatching grants to organizations for general operating support or special projects, cultural facility grants for construction o r renovation of \narts facilities, fellowships and worksite grants to individual artists, apprenticeships for traditional artists, arts education grants for schools \nand teachers, and technical assistance for arts administrators and artists.\n.STARS Number & Budget Unit: 132 SSBA\nS1153 (Ch.199), H462 (Ch.380), H87 (Ch.18)\n.\nBUDGET REDUCTION (Negative Supplemental): S1194 reduced the fiscal year 2003 General Fund appropriation for this agency by 3.5 %.\nAPPROPRIATION HIGHLIGHTS: H462 funded personnel cost rollups for this and other selected agencies. No inflationary increases \nwere funded. No funding for Change in Employee Compensation (CEC) was provided, but compensation increases may be funded with \nagency salary savings wherever possible. Nonstandard Adjustments reflect changes in Attorney General, Controller and Treasurer fees.\nOTHER LEGISLATION: H87 transferred the Idaho Commission on the Arts from the Secretary of State to the Office of the Governor \nbeginning July 1, 2003 (FY 2004).\n.DECISION UNIT SUMMARY: FTP General Federal Total Dedicated\n11.00 885,800 71,500 563,300 1,520,600 FY 2003 Original Appropriation\n0.00 (31,000) 00 (31,000) Budget Reduction (Neg. Supp.)\n11.00 854,800 71,500 563,300 1,489,600 FY 2003 Total Appropriation\n0.00 0 0 0 0 Base Adjustments\n0.00 (17,700) 00 (17,700) Additional Base Adjustments\n11.00 837,100 71,500 563,300 1,471,900 FY 2004 Base\n0.00 4,800 0 13,600 18,400 Personnel Cost Rollups\n0.00 (900) 00 (900) Nonstandard Adjustments\n0.00 (13,400) 0 13,400 0 Fund Shifts\n11.00 827,600 71,500 590,300 1,489,400 FY 2004 Maintenance (MCO)\n(11.00) (827,600) (71,500) (590,300) (1,489,400) 1. Transfer to Gov Office (H87)\n0.00 0 0 0 0 FY 2004 Total Appropriation\nChange From FY 2003 Original Approp.\n% Change From FY 2003 Original Approp.(11.00)\n(100.0%)(1,520,600) (563,300) (71,500) (885,800)\n(100.0%) (100.0%) (100.0%) (100.0%)DIVISION SUMMARY:\nTotal A ppr Actual Total A pprR e quest Gov Rec A ppropFY 2002 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2004 FY 2004\nBY FUND SOURCE\nGeneral 976,700 971,000 854,800 942,800 894,500 0\nDedicated 71,500 28,700 71,500 71,500 71,500 0\nFederal 559,300 537,700 563,300 586,200 576,900 0\n1,537,400 1,489,600 1,600,500 1,542,900 0 Total: 1,607,500\nPercent Change: (4.4%) (3.1%) 7.4% 3.6% (100.0%)\nBY EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION\nPersonnel Costs 539,900 526,400 542,800 564,800 569,600 0\nOperating Expenditures 391,500 336,100 373,400 386,400 373,500 0\nCapital Outlay 12,500 23,400 0 34,800 34,800 0\nTrustee/Benefit 663,600 651,500 573,400 614,500 565,000 0\n1,537,400 1,489,600 1,600,500 1,542,900 0 Total: 1,607,500\nFull-Time Positions (FTP) 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 0.00\n2003 Idaho Legislative Fiscal Report Analyst: Youtz 6 - 74"
} |
[
-0.046915095299482346,
0.044562019407749176,
0.08660673350095749,
-0.027283303439617157,
-0.07701491564512253,
0.0045966897159814835,
-0.08945232629776001,
0.0036239083856344223,
-0.04999374970793724,
0.0599205307662487,
-0.0034412627574056387,
-0.11121927201747894,
0.01653752289712429,
-0.01582973822951317,
-0.1568058580160141,
0.06020720303058624,
-0.010504763573408127,
0.0358523353934288,
-0.004273849539458752,
0.004290369804948568,
-0.01611233875155449,
0.10497082024812698,
-0.02214795909821987,
-0.07633718848228455,
-0.001143965171650052,
0.028407741338014603,
0.04900629073381424,
0.02816896140575409,
-0.01933341659605503,
0.03051295131444931,
0.010185092687606812,
-0.08525753021240234,
-0.046477310359478,
-0.013682419434189796,
0.1113622635602951,
-0.006221826188266277,
0.004804997704923153,
-0.000358709687134251,
0.04566340520977974,
0.1323433220386505,
0.000046548706450266764,
0.02038298361003399,
0.0023459582589566708,
-0.04620160907506943,
-0.09073904156684875,
-0.03748209401965141,
-0.025817668065428734,
0.04285921901464462,
0.02516281232237816,
0.038969241082668304,
0.08644106239080429,
0.07554815709590912,
-0.06674866378307343,
0.06504574418067932,
0.02667257748544216,
0.023817576467990875,
-0.020991947501897812,
-0.03393096476793289,
-0.08425509929656982,
-0.09441712498664856,
0.0027170239482074976,
0.05917429178953171,
-0.07269368320703506,
-0.0042529841884970665,
0.014668826945126057,
0.030450334772467613,
-0.058794550597667694,
0.01370017509907484,
-0.01613112911581993,
-0.06513971835374832,
-0.05252103507518768,
0.011907082051038742,
0.03127969801425934,
0.00938937347382307,
-0.0036108572967350483,
-0.013907298445701599,
0.07386228442192078,
0.00416457699611783,
-0.008631529286503792,
-0.07303366810083389,
0.00681439321488142,
0.02980162762105465,
-0.05071248486638069,
0.016182294115424156,
-0.017651420086622238,
0.026069188490509987,
-0.05052485689520836,
0.0339406318962574,
0.09300897270441055,
0.021437667310237885,
0.1119893342256546,
-0.006446033250540495,
-0.024417977780103683,
-0.08251079171895981,
-0.0008795032044872642,
0.01600118912756443,
-0.009315977804362774,
-0.045510049909353256,
0.023754404857754707,
0.028074443340301514,
-0.03387562185525894,
0.029838472604751587,
-0.006188184954226017,
-0.12455339729785919,
0.08409664779901505,
-0.0075814384035766125,
0.05794873833656311,
0.032603830099105835,
0.002404136350378394,
0.0049696676433086395,
0.030515635386109352,
0.036933187395334244,
-0.004141363315284252,
-0.034479763358831406,
0.01791812852025032,
0.06117669492959976,
-0.025505688041448593,
-0.0482846200466156,
-0.05310436338186264,
-0.048172708600759506,
-0.02768293395638466,
-0.019318152219057083,
-0.04312790185213089,
-0.05543268099427223,
0.025822430849075317,
-0.005392228253185749,
0.053039658814668655,
3.460860712990224e-33,
-0.005837199278175831,
-0.03175509348511696,
0.05525769665837288,
-0.02089914306998253,
0.07121799141168594,
0.03396838530898094,
0.11599135398864746,
-0.02509375289082527,
0.01769169233739376,
-0.01959977298974991,
-0.056381501257419586,
-0.009596873074769974,
-0.09963168203830719,
-0.09817510843276978,
-0.07848954200744629,
-0.022586548700928688,
-0.034703221172094345,
0.03559085354208946,
-0.09530599415302277,
0.0058820522390306,
-0.01879843883216381,
0.01319542434066534,
0.05302829295396805,
-0.06814904510974884,
0.007807579822838306,
-0.04672993719577789,
0.027869023382663727,
-0.003858600277453661,
0.0626293271780014,
-0.0022805295884609222,
-0.003027489874511957,
0.0537109300494194,
0.08383827656507492,
-0.020608587190508842,
-0.042930297553539276,
0.02506968379020691,
-0.01857294887304306,
-0.006176797207444906,
0.04802723601460457,
0.00100186828058213,
-0.022356905043125153,
-0.032595228403806686,
0.062091756612062454,
0.0024667028337717056,
-0.10355627536773682,
-0.04953829199075699,
0.02248101308941841,
-0.07827337831258774,
-0.019199956208467484,
-0.036284446716308594,
0.06202074512839317,
-0.03664035722613335,
-0.06315216422080994,
0.04355182126164436,
-0.07441844791173935,
-0.13127286732196808,
-0.01183799747377634,
-0.000693300215061754,
0.03453250601887703,
0.016210971400141716,
0.028984736651182175,
0.048300597816705704,
0.0039599291048944,
-0.015152860432863235,
0.022127218544483185,
-0.025379270315170288,
0.0019761824514716864,
0.1330767571926117,
0.03980455920100212,
0.03312729671597481,
0.022049926221370697,
-0.029892195016145706,
0.03583361580967903,
-0.043855685740709305,
0.05332094803452492,
0.022290945053100586,
0.0013604877749457955,
-0.009347714483737946,
0.049513112753629684,
-0.011714116670191288,
-0.08058196306228638,
-0.046255674213171005,
-0.021753909066319466,
0.01246289536356926,
0.11396130919456482,
0.02256247214972973,
0.04547451436519623,
-0.01401296816766262,
-0.00755308847874403,
-0.042236268520355225,
0.045264631509780884,
0.03419109433889389,
-0.060909368097782135,
-0.04664864018559456,
0.03899255767464638,
-4.878161965958333e-33,
-0.05885946750640869,
0.0017602525185793638,
0.039388298988342285,
-0.024590909481048584,
-0.007428950630128384,
-0.06509726494550705,
-0.02039927802979946,
0.0008051269105635583,
0.010698427446186543,
-0.005121470429003239,
-0.0696345791220665,
0.07247154414653778,
-0.06731538474559784,
0.009354311972856522,
0.05493931099772453,
0.013356023468077183,
-0.00005924370270804502,
-0.056395627558231354,
-0.03805219754576683,
-0.08199773728847504,
0.009857709519565105,
0.01756383292376995,
-0.02316254936158657,
0.02511248178780079,
-0.07351724058389664,
0.05527638643980026,
-0.03403153270483017,
-0.01396914478391409,
0.07879280298948288,
0.05387990176677704,
0.017794467508792877,
-0.010400496423244476,
-0.046182047575712204,
0.04135531932115555,
0.0013517834013327956,
-0.018441367894411087,
0.06231983006000519,
0.05067339539527893,
-0.014186044223606586,
-0.0587996281683445,
0.056544169783592224,
-0.04759104922413826,
0.011085337959229946,
0.08462973684072495,
0.028562959283590317,
-0.06093680486083031,
-0.03422106057405472,
-0.14791440963745117,
0.047340407967567444,
0.0426812581717968,
-0.039031337946653366,
-0.009014572016894817,
0.0019588815048336983,
0.10122345387935638,
-0.051745425909757614,
0.07935938984155655,
0.09692788124084473,
-0.05508561432361603,
0.018992478027939796,
-0.02387760393321514,
-0.01545507088303566,
0.15606138110160828,
-0.08919142186641693,
0.007668201345950365,
0.05796830356121063,
-0.007549111265689135,
0.02901393175125122,
-0.0713014006614685,
-0.00027562156901694834,
-0.05954137444496155,
-0.03567070886492729,
-0.006617202423512936,
-0.004794849548488855,
-0.1090446412563324,
0.055078696459531784,
0.07400700449943542,
0.028839027509093285,
0.04501509666442871,
-0.0564754344522953,
0.11975477635860443,
-0.022109849378466606,
0.0025081296917051077,
0.01214904710650444,
0.0381101593375206,
-0.08816459774971008,
-0.07438481599092484,
0.05986778065562248,
-0.008739248849451542,
-0.05018599331378937,
0.09704691916704178,
-0.0724552571773529,
0.021827952936291695,
-0.017539113759994507,
0.049628306180238724,
-0.0432167686522007,
-6.328323820525839e-8,
-0.10440986603498459,
0.04594757407903671,
0.011944308876991272,
0.05763121694326401,
0.034201785922050476,
-0.023227736353874207,
0.016824698075652122,
0.09263623505830765,
-0.009594539180397987,
0.03789650276303291,
0.11205518990755081,
-0.030330928042531013,
0.015539765357971191,
0.005247384775429964,
-0.012553826905786991,
-0.05215250700712204,
-0.08541582524776459,
-0.024148181080818176,
-0.027182206511497498,
-0.012932454235851765,
-0.054150842130184174,
0.045055970549583435,
-0.10994374006986618,
0.03761601075530052,
-0.05587281659245491,
0.0014573308872058988,
-0.0396655835211277,
0.09032157808542252,
-0.05187808722257614,
0.05815068632364273,
0.07568633556365967,
0.03793502599000931,
-0.001723612193018198,
0.09665318578481674,
0.0013025669613853097,
-0.027509065344929695,
0.008107294328510761,
-0.022888261824846268,
0.005304045509546995,
0.04142111912369728,
0.013549845665693283,
-0.03189440071582794,
0.0013345690676942468,
0.03424122557044029,
0.07160107791423798,
-0.0372752882540226,
-0.06323549896478653,
0.028446441516280174,
0.07816888391971588,
-0.030771486461162567,
0.025079689919948578,
-0.032300837337970734,
-0.024011624976992607,
-0.013456633314490318,
-0.0032219262793660164,
-0.036781422793865204,
-0.008719868957996368,
0.09426422417163849,
-0.06737501919269562,
0.011623812839388847,
0.06095856800675392,
-0.03709319233894348,
0.003037623828276992,
0.06675665080547333
] | {
"pdf_file": "YFSVOALMVRC2URFKF2QD22YBH4PVS3BG.pdf",
"text": "Comptroller of Maryland\nBay Restoration Fee - By County\nTax Year 2006 4th Quarter Through 01/31/2007\nExpenses Expenses\nSewer Septic Liability Collection Returns w/$ Zero $ Returns Claimed Paid\n100 Allegany 201,683.07 $ 122,999.44 $ 324,682.51 $ 324,682.51 $ 12 1 1,077.87 $ 1,128.12 $ \n200 Anne Arundel 1,233,301.41 646,969.05 1,880,270.46 1,880,270.46 10 3 3,169.39 3,160.75 \n300 Baltimore County 1,408,522.04 236,654.75 1,645,176.79 1,645,176.78 6 2 18,445.89 18,410.39 \n400 Baltimore City 1,872,872.91 4,500.13 1,877,373.04 1,877,373.04 2 1 15,860.00 15,860.00 \n500 Calvert 59,523.33 282,206.11 341,729.44 341,820.90 8 1 1,644.46 2,701.67 \n600 Caroline 27,286.21 64,680.14 91,966.35 91,966.35 7 - 311.57 311.15 \n700 Carroll 126,052.58 168,781.48 294,834.07 297,859.20 9 - 416.41 373.06 \n800 Cecil 139,059.09 177,090.39 316,149.48 316,149.68 18 2 1,893.32 1,556.70 \n900 Charles 261,342.22 39,297.22 300,639.44 300,721.78 10 2 775.00 738.60 \n1000 Dorchester 71,436.00 47,745.27 119,181.27 119,181.27 8 - 4,546.28 3,582.97 \n1100 Frederick 454,513.04 56,689.42 511,202.46 511,202.46 13 1 1,726.96 1,682.43 \n1200 Garrett 57,379.40 35,723.50 93,102.90 93,100.90 5 1 215.34 215.34 \n1300 Harford 466,358.20 122,918.21 589,276.41 589,276.81 7 1 4,705.38 4,978.66 \n1400 Howard 628,064.81 40,604.71 668,674.52 668,674.52 1 - - - \n1500 Kent 58,850.66 29,565.00 88,415.66 88,415.66 6 1 736.86 736.86 \n1600 Montgomery 134,156.50 - 134,156.50 444,936.12 5 1 6,237.92 6,237.92 \n1700 Prince George's 4,496,237.21 115,242.50 4,611,479.71 4,611,486.91 6 1 8,704.93 8,704.93 \n1800 Queen Anne's 66,201.30 105,831.31 172,032.61 172,032.61 5 - 3,205.58 2,795.52 \n1900 St. Mary's 50,943.84 289,743.87 340,687.71 340,687.71 4 1 1,380.06 1,380.06 \n2000 Somerset 13,362.22 45,145.00 58,507.22 58,507.22 2 - 3,744.74 2,937.86 \n2100 Talbot 94,285.19 18,804.50 113,089.80 113,089.69 10 - 1,425.20 795.00 \n2200 Washington 310,315.79 324,886.78 635,232.97 634,930.06 10 - 18,603.78 18,503.78 \n2300 Wicomico 276,089.24 3,531.52 279,620.76 280,291.74 11 - 1,323.17 3,268.71 \n2400 Worcester 52,871.62 28,544.80 81,411.42 81,411.42 5 1 893.92 1,608.69 \nUndesignated - 5,771.00 5,771.00 5,771.00 1 1 - - \nTotal 12,560,707.88$ 3,013,926.10$ 15,574,664.50$ 15,889,016.80$ 181 21 101,044.03$ 101,669.17$ "
} |
[
-0.12104964256286621,
0.06889531761407852,
0.0328560471534729,
0.021349448710680008,
0.03162094205617905,
-0.024898648262023926,
0.022117692977190018,
0.0783483013510704,
-0.038628920912742615,
0.0773187205195427,
0.001537456875666976,
-0.05193420872092247,
-0.017570115625858307,
-0.03396233916282654,
0.04255421832203865,
0.000227996933972463,
0.005420336965471506,
-0.029543647542595863,
-0.06224532797932625,
0.01985376700758934,
0.04565794765949249,
-0.0026962794363498688,
-0.04636375978589058,
-0.06747747212648392,
-0.012638530693948269,
-0.02266675792634487,
-0.05146145075559616,
0.028824057430028915,
-0.004350824747234583,
-0.038438864052295685,
-0.014393043704330921,
0.10155133157968521,
-0.026263190433382988,
0.008569271303713322,
0.001237976481206715,
0.06578276306390762,
-0.0137938242405653,
-0.0034428706858307123,
-0.011072184890508652,
-0.029561137780547142,
-0.040775902569293976,
-0.03280957043170929,
-0.07496291399002075,
-0.06906932592391968,
-0.028563063591718674,
0.02890716679394245,
-0.0007694170344620943,
-0.04594156891107559,
-0.08114868402481079,
-0.028708036988973618,
-0.014554707333445549,
0.02681143954396248,
-0.004427080973982811,
-0.006780322641134262,
0.007990440353751183,
-0.05348966270685196,
0.03941726312041283,
-0.09356041252613068,
-0.023954259231686592,
-0.02075677551329136,
-0.004373787436634302,
-0.002510098507627845,
-0.14284281432628632,
-0.040005289018154144,
0.040853679180145264,
-0.024982042610645294,
0.0879359245300293,
0.07151807844638824,
0.0005318105104379356,
-0.025884749367833138,
0.0037505950313061476,
-0.08269837498664856,
-0.11854760348796844,
0.0025716398376971483,
-0.01977439597249031,
0.06229054182767868,
0.031090984120965004,
0.058699142187833786,
0.047806207090616226,
-0.1107606515288353,
0.057505447417497635,
0.08311852067708969,
-0.024864329025149345,
-0.09826674312353134,
0.024794206023216248,
0.05083324760198593,
0.00950468610972166,
0.02511610835790634,
0.07690627127885818,
-0.025593040511012077,
0.04372584819793701,
0.030767718330025673,
0.015638208016753197,
0.041625071316957474,
0.1497778743505478,
0.058756474405527115,
-0.03306988999247551,
-0.058858007192611694,
-0.008994045667350292,
0.037072405219078064,
0.03374814614653587,
0.013880751095712185,
-0.026868317276239395,
-0.03927523270249367,
-0.09731046110391617,
-0.03989414498209953,
-0.02840397134423256,
0.021680885925889015,
0.038759782910346985,
-0.04073914885520935,
-0.03375902771949768,
-0.02306414768099785,
0.025266502052545547,
-0.06851460784673691,
0.015324736014008522,
0.06417062133550644,
-0.013281150721013546,
0.00476592592895031,
0.11964026093482971,
0.019515976309776306,
0.06517796963453293,
-0.015415891073644161,
0.009672388434410095,
0.006810330785810947,
0.0769416019320488,
0.007020245306193829,
0.07291373610496521,
1.0381890434013609e-32,
-0.06148533150553703,
-0.0033612451516091824,
-0.02284937910735607,
-0.01966051198542118,
0.017773371189832687,
0.06520095467567444,
-0.005430156830698252,
0.029948722571134567,
0.04827216640114784,
-0.09600737690925598,
-0.04866274073719978,
0.0003579528129193932,
0.0032405711244791746,
0.003984257113188505,
0.07185151427984238,
-0.0924944281578064,
0.049252770841121674,
0.017680469900369644,
-0.007445162627846003,
0.009656837210059166,
0.014830606058239937,
-0.07496888190507889,
0.035766392946243286,
-0.02643987350165844,
0.07932635396718979,
-0.015958337113261223,
0.047870781272649765,
-0.05879248306155205,
-0.0012530998792499304,
0.048261549323797226,
0.11763731390237808,
0.03711307421326637,
-0.03434225916862488,
0.04617290571331978,
-0.0699574425816536,
-0.002002720721065998,
-0.001312701147980988,
-0.027287883684039116,
0.022252259775996208,
-0.057985950261354446,
0.025171516463160515,
0.06318741291761398,
-0.03259309381246567,
0.05531374737620354,
0.015454810112714767,
-0.03188706561923027,
0.0555008240044117,
-0.0060173687525093555,
0.002654389711096883,
0.00285781710408628,
0.018814681097865105,
0.056765198707580566,
-0.09953133016824722,
-0.08134008944034576,
0.023590343073010445,
0.07168420404195786,
0.0008464866550639272,
-0.01668974757194519,
0.012236051261425018,
-0.017359299585223198,
-0.02859901264309883,
0.03489178791642189,
0.00970633514225483,
-0.030506916344165802,
0.026353560388088226,
-0.0007329295040108263,
-0.04845166578888893,
0.012073606252670288,
-0.03294600173830986,
-0.034628208726644516,
-0.06642556935548782,
-0.0826721116900444,
0.03676104173064232,
-0.03207932412624359,
0.000999003299511969,
-0.04043830186128616,
0.03970078006386757,
0.1089656725525856,
-0.006745121907442808,
0.00360444956459105,
-0.059513792395591736,
0.08650116622447968,
-0.007693761959671974,
-0.08579454571008682,
0.09637181460857391,
-0.15716397762298584,
0.006397472694516182,
0.03806120529770851,
-0.004429683554917574,
-0.016669102013111115,
0.07541517913341522,
0.03585191071033478,
-0.01178310438990593,
0.049107905477285385,
0.009859911166131496,
-1.116163771390028e-32,
-0.053926169872283936,
0.036558058112859726,
-0.0677613765001297,
0.027055872604250908,
-0.051009345799684525,
-0.0064865280874073505,
-0.03383197635412216,
-0.06498963385820389,
0.025814009830355644,
-0.03823999688029289,
-0.03477996587753296,
-0.02371763437986374,
-0.0008973988005891442,
-0.05356259644031525,
0.017489874735474586,
-0.027088163420557976,
-0.011196843348443508,
0.0008460046374239028,
-0.062353525310754776,
0.056991878896951675,
0.009572328068315983,
0.04251721873879433,
-0.013896387070417404,
0.012376618571579456,
-0.006949647795408964,
0.010383677668869495,
-0.0031246335711330175,
-0.000724293349776417,
0.020897500216960907,
-0.052287861704826355,
0.012161178514361382,
-0.03185131400823593,
-0.11299172788858414,
0.043416187167167664,
-0.025669896975159645,
-0.047640252858400345,
0.18464715778827667,
-0.027865860611200333,
-0.0849066749215126,
0.0242747962474823,
0.0888325572013855,
0.04277445375919342,
-0.0036435225047171116,
-0.04380547255277634,
-0.05636214837431908,
-0.039043691009283066,
-0.002751279389485717,
-0.06977368146181107,
-0.030524788424372673,
-0.04626934602856636,
0.11722833663225174,
-0.0022569792345166206,
-0.0354144312441349,
0.008632748387753963,
0.04484551027417183,
-0.019350210204720497,
0.08184374868869781,
-0.019428499042987823,
-0.14823220670223236,
-0.05265098065137863,
0.07884546369314194,
0.010284113697707653,
0.06890520453453064,
-0.06438672542572021,
0.04491472616791725,
-0.008032280020415783,
0.002206570701673627,
-0.00926892925053835,
0.05732528120279312,
-0.038152605295181274,
0.005814138799905777,
-0.000005309569587552687,
-0.05972546339035034,
-0.08114505559206009,
-0.008610429242253304,
-0.0006204322562552989,
0.04599135369062424,
-0.059971652925014496,
-0.026919715106487274,
-0.026968225836753845,
-0.05317256599664688,
0.036628566682338715,
-0.07018955051898956,
-0.07600471377372742,
0.004120244644582272,
-0.1064295619726181,
0.05160687491297722,
-0.08873656392097473,
0.07961167395114899,
0.02508184313774109,
-0.11148333549499512,
-0.05154557153582573,
-0.016093067824840546,
0.103465236723423,
0.033057861030101776,
-7.05173519577329e-8,
0.07822855561971664,
-0.0167265385389328,
0.03133847191929817,
0.024519244208931923,
0.02932334505021572,
-0.05067720636725426,
-0.010751851834356785,
-0.008620096370577812,
-0.003327685873955488,
0.07446631044149399,
0.11294908821582794,
0.01294427178800106,
0.03778369352221489,
-0.04535660520195961,
0.035153016448020935,
-0.0446971096098423,
0.017965923994779587,
0.033580172806978226,
-0.08808644115924835,
-0.05188833922147751,
0.039930082857608795,
0.02591095305979252,
-0.06409783661365509,
0.0391935296356678,
0.08015626668930054,
-0.0060063921846449375,
0.04237484559416771,
-0.028883112594485283,
0.03057168796658516,
0.03921976312994957,
-0.0864788144826889,
-0.030363725498318672,
0.044804539531469345,
0.0057816943153738976,
-0.033305082470178604,
-0.009863712824881077,
0.0072042387910187244,
0.029322929680347443,
0.03299387916922569,
0.06032377853989601,
0.011813691817224026,
-0.017058705911040306,
0.0009291599271818995,
0.07251478731632233,
-0.004406193736940622,
-0.003262691432610154,
-0.10775966942310333,
-0.11524804681539536,
0.0045781913213431835,
-0.019403677433729172,
-0.014488116838037968,
0.0008423066465184093,
0.08383581042289734,
0.07482791692018509,
0.024239424616098404,
0.09580206125974655,
-0.07660852372646332,
-0.0354938767850399,
0.00592306163161993,
0.014442029409110546,
0.009507762268185616,
-0.03350377827882767,
-0.0469018928706646,
0.07011949270963669
] | {
"pdf_file": "U55XYWRRRDDHAJPPHG6QWKZSAVKMQ5W5.pdf",
"text": " procurem ent process that has produced too few long-term power purchase agreem ents; \nthe need for new and upgraded transm ission to access renewable resources, and the \nneed to understand the impact of integrati ng larg e am ounts of interm ittent renewab les \ninto th e electricity g rid. \nWe caution, however, that th e intermittency “barrier ” is presently one of \npercep tion; it m ay be determ ined in a recen tly in itiated P IER study that sig nificant \nquantities of wind can be added to the syst em without im posing significant costs or \nrequiring significant changes in system resources or operating procedures. \n \nWe urge th e Commiss ion to make certa in mo difica tions in its final r eport. As th e \nDraft Report amply indicates, there is plenty of work to do if the RPS goals are going to \nbe met, so w e should avoid spending time on solutions that do not address real p roblems. \n \n5. We strongly urge the Commission to re move the Draft Report’s call for the \ndevelopment of statewide protocols for studying avia n mortality to address site-specific \nimpacts. Staff docum ents in support of th e Energy Report process never suggested that \nexisting sets of protocols are inadequate, nor has staff studied local siting processes in \nthe state. Wind facilities in California are sited w ith appropriate environm ental review, \nwhich is why the Altam ont avian fatality problem rem ains unique. \nCalWEA does, however, support a set of protocols issued by the National W ind \nCoordinating Comm ittee and cite d by staff; these protocols were authored by a for mer \nstaff m ember of this Commission. We would support a Commission recommendation \nthat local siting authorities a dopt these protocols for use when they deem studies to be \nnecessary. Giving additional weight to study protocols would require an am endm ent to \nCEQA. The lead lo cal agencies und er CEQA ar e best equ ipped to ta ilor studies to s ite-\nspecific circum stances (which can differ with in each individual wind resource area). \n \n6. We urge the Comm ission to rem ove the thr ee options proposed in the Draf t Report to \nsimplify adm inistration of the RPS program . None of these options actually address \nthe barriers and problem s that were correc tly iden tified as the m ajor obstacles to \nachieving RPS goals, and they would create problem s of the ir own. Pursuing them \nwould require legislation and m ore implem entation, which would divert years of tim e \nand attention away from addressing issu es that are worthy of attention. \n \n7. Instead of highlighting these solutions , the final report should focus on other \nrecomm endations that are m ade which do us efully addres s the identified problem s, \nsuch as: (a) sim plifying and standardizing power purchase contracts; (b) improving the \ntranspa rency and unif ormity of utility procurem ent proces ses; and (c ) involving th e \nCAISO in planning for transm ission to m eet RPS goals. \n \nIn addition to the reco mmendatio ns add ressed above, there are s everal additional \nways in which the Commission can and sh ould advance the RPS goals, which are not \nincluded in the Draft R eport, but should be reflected in th e final one. \n \n8. The Comm ission should engage the CAISO in its PIER Interm ittency Analysis P roject \n(IAP). W e believe this important project is missing an im portant opportunity to engage \n 2 the CAISO at the h ighest levels to en sure that it s upports th e methods that will b e \nemployed in the effort. The Draft Report states that the CAISO should undertake a \nsimilar res earch in itiativ e. Rather th an encourage a duplic ation of efforts, the \nComm ission should include the CAISO in its own efforts to ensure that it will be \ncomf ortable with the res ults and can imm ediately take further actions from there. \n \n9. The Comm ission should produce system integra tion cost inform ation for application to \nRPS bids (integration cost adde rs). The RPS statute requires that the utilities conside r \nthe system integra tion c osts and cap acity v alues associated w ith renewable resource \nbids. To date, the CPUC has relied upon in form ation from the CEC’s studies for this \ninform ation, but we do not have this inform ation for significant additional quantities of \nrenewable r esources, w hich the CP UC will nee d in approv ing renewables-re lated \ntransm ission upgrades. As far as we can determ ine, the Comm ission has no effort \nunderway to produce this inform ation, which is needed to advance the state’s RPS \ngoals. W e strongly encourage the Commission to ensure that this gap is filled, either \nas part of the IAP, or from a separate effort. \n \n10. The Comm ission should ensure that WREGIS tracks energy deliveries. The Draft \nReport m entions the im portance of assuring th at RPS energy is ac tually d elivered in to \nthe state, but the Comm ission has not taken steps to achieve that through the W REGIS \nsystem . \n \n11. The Comm ission should develop guidelines for issuing SEP paym ents so that there w ill \nbe no delays should SEPs be required. \n \n Finally, w e believe that the Draft Repor t’s cr iticis ms of FERC on the Tehachapi \n“trunk line” decision are misgu ided, and should be replaced w ith a di scussion of the tools \nthat the state should be using to ach ieve California’s RPS transmission goals. \n \n12. We do not agree that FE RC “rem oved the prim ary instrum ent the state could have used \nto address transm ission constraints for re newab les” and “effectiv ely bar[red] the \nadvanced planning and construction of transm ission facilities.” Once SCE \ncharacterized the trunk line as being devoi d of network benefits, FERC had no legal \noption but to dism iss the notion of charging transm ission custom ers for it. \n \n13. FERC deserves significant credit for using its leg al flexibility to gran t SCE’s reques t to \nenable it to build transm ission f acilities in advance of genera tor in terconnection \nrequests. FERC had no obligation to do th is; it reached far b eyond what it had ev er \ndone before, and should be comm ended for it. \n \n14. Rather than lodge unfounded com plaints ag ainst FERC, the Comm ission should place \nthe focus on the other recommendations that the Draf t Report m akes rela ted to th is \nissue - - modifying the C AISO tarif f to give the C AISO the ability to con sider sta te \npolicy goals (p. 86) and encouraging com prehensive transm ission planning efforts by \nthe Comm ission, the CP UC and the CAISO. \n \n 3 15. In addition, the Comm ission should highlight th e need for the CPUC to us e its statutory \nauthority under PU Code Section 399.25 (a ) to prom ote transm ission upgrades that \nprovide network benefits while tapping th e state’s m ajor renewable resou rce areas \n(with costs therefore recoverable from all transmission cu stomers), and (b) to ensu re \nthat those up grades are financed by th e tran smission owner. Had the CPUC used this \ntool effectively in the S CE’s “trunk line” case, the upgrade could have been approved \nthe first tim e around without the need for any m ajor changes in FERC’s current \napproach to transm ission cost recovery. To m eet California’s RPS goals, we need to \nlearn from this m istake. \n \n \nII. COMMENTS ON WIND-AVI AN ISSUES \n \nA. The Commission Should Remove the Draft Report’s Call for Develop ment \nof Statew ide Protocols for Studyin g Avian Mortality \n \nThe Draft Energy Report (p. 103) calls for “ developing statew ide protocols for studying \navian m ortality to addres s site-specific im pacts in each ind ividual wind res ource area” \n(emphasis added). No explanation was provide d. Staff doc uments supporting the Integrated \nEnergy Policy Report (IEPR) process on this issu e suggested that “[s]tatewide guidelines for \nwind energy projects m ay be an appropriate way to gain consistency statewide when \ndeveloping and m itigating projec ts”1 but did not suggest that exis ting protocols are inadequate. \nStaff cited protocols issued by the National Wind Coordinating Comm ittee (NW CC) and the \nU.S. Fish & W ildlife Service (USFWS). Indee d, the lead author of the NWCC docum ent was \nthe Comm ission’s own Richard Anderson, a wildlif e ecologist and then-project m anager for \navian-wind studies. \n \nCalWEA supports th e NWCC protocols,2 and would support a Comm ission \nrecomm endation that lo cal siting authorities ad opt those protocols for use when they deem \nstudies to be necessary. For the protocols to carry greater weight than a recomm endat ion \nwould require an am endm ent to CEQA. \n \nRegarding adapting the protoco ls for each wi nd resource area, as the N WCC protocols \nstate: \n \nIn jurisdictions requiring bird research, the inform ation in this docum ent can be \nused to develop standard operating pro cedures (SOPs) and/ or study designs. \nHowever, many situ ations will require site-sp ecific knowledge and expert \nrecomm endations as to which study design and m ethods are most appropriate. \n \nThe lead local agencies under CEQA are best equipped to tailor stud ies to site-specific \ncircum stances (which can differ within each indi vidual wind resource area). Staff docum ents \n \n1 California E nergy Comm ission Staff Report, “Asse ssment of Avian Mortalit y from Collisions and \nElectrocutions” (CEC-700-2005- 015). June 2005 . \n2 Indeed, had these protocols been followed by the authors of the 2004 PIER report discussed below, \nthat stud y would n ot now be the subject of considerable controversy. \n 4 in support of the IEPR process did no t study th e local s iting p rocesses in California, let alon e \nprovide any evidence that they are not working. That m odern wind facilities in Calif ornia are \nsited with appropriate environm ental review is evidenced by th e absence of significant facility-\nrelated av ian mortality outside the Altam ont. \n \nFor exam ple, in Solano County where avia n impacts are a concern, the county has \nextens ive pre-construction and post-constructio n monitoring procedures in place, which are \nspecific to local topographic f eatures and avian populations. The county has also imposed \nappropriate m itigation m easures.3 The developers in Solano County also engaged local \nUSFWS offi cials in inform al discussions concer ning their proposed projects, and the Service \nhad no objections. In the Altam ont, the area of prim ary concern, the county’s newly adopted \nprogram to identif y effective m itigation m easures will be inf ormed by an independent \nScientific Review Comm ittee, including two m embers appointed by state and federal wildlife \nauthor ities, which will r eport to cou nty officials. \n \nThe Comm ission should therefore delete the recommendation to develop statewide \nprotocols, and should not endeavor to devel op site-specific guidelines for the unlim ited \nnumber of site-specific situ ations that m ay arise. \n \nB. The Draft Energy Report Correctly Expresses Caution Regarding a CEC \nConsultant Report on Wind-Avian Issues \n \nCalWEA strongly supports and appreciates th e statem ent (p. 102) which appropriately \ncasts doubt upon the scientific validity of the findings of the 2004 PIER report by Smallwood \nand Thelander. The Draft Report correctly iden tifies som e of the serious flaws in the study \n(“[i]nadequate access to certain turbines, tim e lapses between surveys, length of survey period, \nand various extrapo lation techniqu es”) which ca ll into qu estion the m ortality estim ates m ade in \nthe study as well as the v alidity of the proposed mitig ation m easures, which the Draft Report \nappropriately labels as “experim ental.”4 \n \nUnfortunately, the consultant report has alr eady taken on a life of its own. Despite the \nflaws cited in the Draft Energy Report, th e mitigation m easures propos ed in the 200 4 PIER \nreport will n everth eless be im plem ented wit hout further testing in essentially all non-\nrepowered wind projects in Alam eda County (though they will b e monitored clos ely for \neffectivenes s by the Scie ntific Revie w Committe e). More w orrisom e is that the un tested \nmeasures – which were developed based on obsolet e turb ines in the Alta mont terrain – have \nbeen raised by siting officials around the country as potentially appropriate in areas where \n \n3 Commissio n Staff is apparently unaware of the mitigation m easures adopted for Solano Count y \nprojects. In its response to filed commen ts, sta ff state s “We are una ware of any significant m easures \nother then [ sic] monitoring (which is not mitigati on) occurring at ot her California wind farms to reduce \navian collision.” (CEC Staff Response to Public Comments, August 31, 2005, at PDF-page 129.) \n \n4 At the October 6 IEPR hearing, proponents of th is study asserted that (even if the m ortality estimates \nare wrong), the m ortality associations with partic ular turbines (on which the proposed m itigat ion \nmeasures ar e based) are co rrect becaus e they were based on actual carcas ses found, not esti mates. We \ndisagree. The mortality associations suffer fro m many of the same flaws as the mortality estimates. \n(For m ore dis cussion, see Appendix 1, footnote 2.) \n 5 avian m ortality is no t remotely comparable to th e unique pro blem at the Altam ont. CalW EA is \nconcerned that Comm ission staff, who also erro neously be lieve tha t the model is app licab le \noutside the Altam ont, will continu e to prom ote its use m ore broadly. \n \nBecause of the traction that the 2004 PIER report has gained, CalWEA ha s requested \nthat the Commission conduct an outside independent review of the scientif ic validity of the \nreport’s conclusions; Commission managem ent has ag reed to seek such an assessm ent and we \nlook forward to the resu lts. The win d operato rs in the Altam ont Pass are comm itted, and now \nobligated, to finding ways to reduce avian m ortality, but no one is served by widely \nimplementing m easures that m ay prove ineffective or counter-productive. \n \nAn independent review of the 2004 PIER report is especially warranted in view of the \nstaff’s inadequate response to i ndustry criticism s of that report, as we explain in an attached \nappendix. \n \nC. The Commission Should Not Cite the Flaw ed 2004 PIER Study as an \nImportant Source of Know ledge \n \nThe Draft Energy Report states (p. 101), \"Ca lifornia has an importa nt opportunity to \nmore carefully site new turbines based on knowle dge of bird flight pa tterns, thereby reducing \nand avoiding bird deaths from wind turbines .\" In support of this statem ent, a 2005 staff \ndocum ent is cited which, in turn, is based on the behavioral observations from the 2004 PIER \nreport. That reference should be removed, for several reasons. \nFirst, in ligh t of the Draf t Energy Report’s subsequent st atem ent ca lling into question \nthe scientific validity of the 2004 PIER report (d iscussed in section II.A. 2, above), this report \nshould not be referenced as an im portant source of knowledge regarding turbine siting.5 \nSecond, as we stated in the pr evious section, the 2004 PIER Repor t is specific to the Altam ont \nterrain, and is therefore not appl icable to the repowering of proj ects els ewhere in California. \nAnd, finally, when avian issues are a concern w ith proposed repowers outside of the Altam ont, \nthe indus try conducts pre-constructio n avian s tudies and uses the results w hen turb ine siting \ndecisions are m ade. \n \nIII. COMMENTS ON WIND REPOWER ISS UES \n \nA. The Draft Energy Report Appropriately Encourages the CPUC to \nPromote Repow ers, and Could Be More Specific \n \nCalWEA strongly supports th e Draft Report’s recomm endation (p. 103) that the \n“CPUC quickly develop new Qualif ying Facility contra cts to overcom e impedim ents to \nrepowering and take advantage of the Federal Production Tax Cr edit” (P TC) to help achieve \n \n5 As explained in an appendix to these comment s, the underl ying data used to identify \"problem \nturbines\" suffers fro m an a bsence of controls for b ackground m ortality, incons istent search fre quencies \nand search ar eas, inconsist ent study durations , and a l ikelihood of c arcass double-counting. \n 6 the goals of reducing avian fatalities in the Al tamont Pass and to help m eet the s tate’s RPS \ngoals. \n \nThe CPUC has not taken any specific acti ons to prom ote repowers, despite having \nidentified repowering as an im portant goal. As CalW EA state d in rec ent comments to the \nCPUC,6 there is one action that the CPUC could ta ke to prom ote repowers in the short term \n(i.e., that wo uld accelerate repowerin g beyond the schedule required by Alam eda County): it \ncould strongly encourage PG&E (and Edison) to offer contract am endm ents that allow project \nowners to re tain the f ull value of their exis ting co ntrac ts for th eir historical (or contrac t-\nestim ated) d eliveries when they repo wer, and to pay short-run avoide d costs for additional \ndeliveries. The CPUC has alrea dy adopted contract am endm ents that provide for this, but the \nutilities have been unwilling to offer them broadly. \nB. Suggested Corrections for Accura cy \n \n There are a num ber of statem ents in th e Draft Energy Report that could be m ore \naccurate if modified. \n \n1. Repowering progress \n \nThe Draft IEPR states (p. 102), “To date, California has m ade only lim ited progress \ntoward repo wering wind facilities, w ith only 37 MW of repowered wind contra cts su bmitted \nby SCE to the CPUC as of July 2005.” In a ddition to those contracts (which have been \napproved), the CPUC ha s approved two repower contracts with PG&E totaling between 45.7 \nand 60.7 MW. (This includes th e 17.7 M W Diablo W inds project, which was recently \ncompleted, and a contract for the repowering of the Buena Vista pro ject, totaling betw een 28 \nand 43 MW , which is expected to be com pleted in m id-2006.) Thus, the statem ent could be \nmore accurately restated as fo llows: “To date, California h as made limited progress toward \nrepowering wind f acilities, with only 83-98 M W of repowered wind c ontrac ts sub mitted by \nSCE and PG&E to the C PUC as of August 2005.” \n \n2. Alam eda County requirem ents \n \nOn p. 102, the Draft Energy Report states, “C urrently, neither Alam eda County nor the \nwind industry proposes to repower the entire Altamont Pass; both are focused instead on \nrenewing existing perm its, with a proposed c ondition that repowering would only occur over \n13 years.” This statem ent would be more accura tely rephrased as follows: “Alam eda County \nadopted a requirem ent in Septem ber 2005 that will require all existing wind projects in \nAlam eda County to be repowered within 13 years.” \n \nOn p. 92, the Draft Energy Report states, “planni ng officials in the Altam ont area have \nplaced a m oratorium on perm its for both new a nd repowered wind facilities until they are \nconfident that steps have been taken to reduce bird deaths.” T his statem ent could m ore \n \n6 CPUC Docket R.04-04- 026, “Repl y Comments of the California Wind Energ y Association on the \nProposed Decision of ALJ Simon Regarding Long-Te rm RPS Plans” (October 3, 2005). \n \n 7 precis ely read, “planning officials in Alam eda County have placed a m oratorium on perm its in \nthat coun ty pending co mpletion of an EIR th at will cons ider repower ing as well as new \ntechnologies and siting possibilitie s. At the sam e time, county officials imposed a perm it \ncondition that requires perm it holders to repower 10% of their turbines in year four, 35% in \nyear eight, 85% in year 10, and 100% in year 13.” \n \n3. U.S. tax code restrictions on repowers \n \nThe last sentence in the following statem ent (p. 102) is not entirely accurate: \n \n“[P]rovisions in the U.S. Tax Code (Secti on 45) prevent repowere d wind f acilities with \nexisting standard offer contracts from qua lifying for the producti on tax credit unless \nthe contract is am ended so that any wind generation in excess of historical production \nlevels is e ither sold to th e utility at it s curren t avoided cos t or sold to a th ird \nparty.[ footnote om itted] This provis ion discoura ged wind operato rs from repowering \nbecause u tility avoided costs are m uch lo wer than curren t contract p rices. \n \nThe last sentence should be rephrased as fo llows: “This provision has discouraged wind \noperato rs from repowering because, in additi on to lim iting th e pric e paid for addition al \ndelive ries resulting f rom the repowe r, the utiliti es have, with a few exceptions, been un willing \nto allow developers to r etain the f ull valu e of their exis ting co ntracts for th eir cu rrent delivery \nlevels (or contract-estim ated deliveries) and have required proposed repowers to engage in \ncostly b idding processe s rathe r than f acilita te rep owers throu gh bilateral negotia tions .” \n \n \nIV. COMMENTS ON RPS BARRIERS, PROBL EMS & SOLUTIONS \n \nA. Some of the Barriers to Achievin g RPS Goals Identified in the Draft \nReport are On Target; Others Sho uld Be Modified \n \nWe share th e Draft Energy Report’s concern ( p. 92) that renewable energy procurem ent \nunder the Renewables Po rtfolio Stand ard (RPS) law is not pro ceeding as q uickly as needed to \nreach the state’s RPS goals by 2010. And we agr ee largely w ith th e Draft Report’s assessm ent \n(p. 89) of the barriers that m ust be overc ome for the state to m eet its RPS goals: \n \n• The lack o f long-term purchase agreemen ts for pow er. We agree th at this is a \nproblem , and that it stem s from other problem s that the Draf t Report ide ntifies (p. 92 ) – \nnamely, an overly com plex procurem ent pro cess for renewables (p. E-5) and unclear \nand non-transparent least-cost, best-fit pol icies employed by invest or-owned utilities \n(IOUs). \n \n• The need for new and/or upgraded transmis sion to acces s renew able resources \n(see subsections D and E, below, for more discussion on this issue), and \n \n• The impact of in tegrating larg e amount s of intermitten t renew able resources \ninto the e lectricity gr id. We urge the Comm ission to clar ify, however, that presently \nthe bar rier is the perception of impacts, rather than actual ones. As the Dr aft Report \n 8 notes elsewhere (p. 90 -91, p. 100), the operation al cons traints posed by interm ittent \nrenewables in the near term are m anageable and do not im pose significant costs on the \nsystem , and the Comm ission’s PIER program has a sophisticated research effort \nunderway th at will asses s the im pacts of integrating large am ounts of interm ittent \nrenewable resources into California’s syst em. Based on experience in other system s \nwith m uch higher wind energy penetrations than we have here, the Comm ission should \nreserv e judg ment as to whether a la rge incr ease in wind energ y on our sys tem will be a \nsignificant barrier to achieving RPS goals. \n \nWe agree th at the f ourth barrier iden tified in the Draf t Report – the lack of repow ering \nof aging w ind facilities – should be addressed to contribut e toward RPS goals and to reduce \nthe avian f atality leve ls unique to the A ltamont. However, the quantity of additional \ngeneration associated with repowers is sm all in c omparison to the over all RPS goals.7 \nTherefore, a failure of the ut ilities to secure additional en ergy through repowers should not, by \nitself, be co nsidered a major ba rrier to achieving RPS goals on a par with providing \ntransm ission access to major renewable resou rce areas o r simplifying the procurem ent process. \n \nB. We Agree With the R PS Implementation Problems Identified in th e Draft \nReport, and Encourage the Commission to Add Others \n \nThe Draft Energy Report (p. 92) has identifi ed three prim ary problem s with the RPS \nprogram : \n \n• The lack of transparency in the bidding, ranking, a nd contracting processes, \n• The administrative complexity of the program, and \n• The uneve n application of RPS targets to all r etail se llers in the state. \n \nWe agree th at these are m ajor problem s that req uire rem edies. W e would also id entify \nas prim ary problem s the CPUC’s i mplem entation of the transm ission planning and cost \nrecovery provisions of the RPS statute, and the developm ent of transm ission cost adders, \nwhich we discuss further below in subsections D and E. \n \nC. The Draft Report’s Proposed Solutions to RP S Problems Do Not Al ways \nAddress the Identified Barriers an d Problems \n \nSome of the Draft Energy Report’s propos als to improve the RPS i mplementation \nprocess are on target; others do not address th e barriers and problem s identified in th e Draf t \nReport or experienced by CalWEA m embers. \n \n1. The three options proposed to si mplify administra tion of the RPS \nprogram do not address the identified problems \n \n \n7 If the entire fleet of approxim ately 1,000 MW second- and t hird-generation tur bines were repowered, \nenergy production from those facilities would in crease by approximately one-third, adding the \nequivalent of a few hundred m egawatts of new wind generation to the sy stem . \n 9 The Draf t Report (p. 93 -94) iden tifies three options for sim plifying the adm inistration \nof the RPS program , none of which address the barriers and problem s prev iously id entified as \nmajor obstacles to achieving RPS goals, and a ll of which would be counter-productive. \nMoreover, these changes would re quire legis lative changes, whic h would divert years of tim e \nand energy f rom solving the real problem s. Thes e options should therefore be elim inated from \nthe final d raft report. \n \n(a) Option 1 - Eliminatin g the market price referen t (MP R) and supplementa l \nenergy payment (SEP) processes in favor of a standard reasonableness review process. \nWhile this change would sim plify the process, the Draft Report did no t identif y the MPR or \nSEP paym ent issues as a significant problem . Indeed, they are not: th e MPRs are transparen t \nfigures; they were developed in a fairly effi cient manner through a working group and without \nhearings; they are rela tively non-controversial; and they are not involved in the resource \nselection process (the MPR serves only as a dividing line between contract paym ents and SEP \npaym ents). To date, no contracts have required SEP paym ents, so this cannot explain the lack \nof signed contracts. W e would add that the MP R process should get easier as the CPUC gains \nexperience and estab lishes precedents; in add ition, the discussions this year on tim e-of-\ndelivery MP Rs are likely to reduce the num ber of MPRs to just one. \n \n(b) Option 2 - Creating a single cut-o ff con tract price belo w which contracts \nwould be judged reasonable, w ith co sts recoverable in utility rates. This methodology, \nemployed in the pre-RPS “interim ” procurem ents, is lik ewise a imed at the MPR/SEP issue, \nwhich is not the problem. In addition, taking th is step cou ld well c reate far m ore controversy \nand delay than the current MPR/ SEP process. The “cut-off” c ontract price would be highly \nsubjective and controversial – i ndeed, it would open up a fight that was se ttled (af ter long \nnegotia tions ) with th e MPR/SEP provisions in th e RPS legislation : the u tilities must sign \ncontracts up to the MPR price a nd must sign them until the SEP funds a re exhaus ted. Given \ncurrent gas price forecasts, e xhausting the funds ought not to be an issue well past 2010. \n \n(c) Option 3 - Aw arding public funds fo r RPS contracts through auctions for \nproduction incentives (with awards conditioned on rece iving contracts through the R PS \nsolicitation process). Once again, this solution ta rgets a non-problem : the application of SEP \npaym ents, which no contract has so far requir ed. Returning to th e Comm ission’s au ction \nprocess for subsidy paym ents when subsidies ar e not required obviously fails to address any \nreal p roblem . \n \nWe also note that a few other recomm enda tions m ade in the Draft Report (p. 94 and \n96) are already being addresse d by the CPUC. Delivery flexib ility provisions adopted in \nCPUC Decision 05-07-0 39 (July 21, 2005) appro ving utility com pliance p lans and RFOs will \nenable inter-utility trades of renewables and shaped products, a nd a recent alternate proposed \ndecision will, if adopted, enable the use of tradable renewable energy credits (RECs). \n \nRegarding the Draft Report’s recom mendation (p. 94) that shaped contracts should \ninclude the stored and shaped products offere d by the Bonneville Power A dministration which \ncan delay deliveries by as m uch as a week, we ur ge the Comm ission to add a caution that such \nproducts should only be approved if it can be show n that they cause total in-state deliveries of \n 10 power to increase over the status quo in am ounts equivalent to the purchased power. \nOtherwise, California does not receive the in-state benefits of reduced in-state gas-fired \ngeneration. \n \n2. The Draft Report should focus on the useful solutions that it iden tifies \n \nWhile the D raft Energy Report highlights the above solutions, which we believe would \nnot be helpf ul, it underplays other recommendati ons which do usefully address th e identified \nproblem s and barriers. These recommendations shoul d receive greater play in the final report. \n \n(a) Standardi zed contracts w ould si mplify the procureme nt process. We strongly \nsupport the Draft Report’s recomm endation (p. 94) that the C PUC should develop standard \npower purchase contracts. CalW EA has consistently advocated greater standardization of \nterms since the incep tion of RPS i mplem entation. Unfortunately, our positions have been \nopposed by the utilities and not been adopted. We hope that this will chan ge in view o f the \nextens ive delays asso ciated with the recent renew able RFPs of all three utilities, which bear \ntestam ent to the need to s tream line th e contract negotiation process. W e continue to believe \nthat the complicated Edison Electric Institut e (“E EI”) form contrac t--an u nnecessa rily \ncomplicated and often inapplicab le set of contract term s and conditions--should not be used as \nthe basis for RPS contracts. The utilities do deserve som e credit, however, for taking steps on \ntheir own to reduce bidding hurdles; for exam ple, SCE abandoned the EEI contract in its latest \nsolicitation, and PG&E and SCE ha ve lowered their bid deposit requirements. Much more \ncould and should be done, however , to reduce the cost and tim e associated with bidding, which \nserves to reduce the num ber of participants and drive up costs. \n \n(b) Grea ter transparen cy and uniformity o f the bid evalua tion process is \nnecessary. We strongly support the Dr aft Report’s call (p. E -3, 45) for more open and \ntranspa rent utility p rocurement processes and (p. 92) for m ore consistent and transp arent le ast-\ncost, best-fit m ethods used by IOUs to rank RPS bidders. Bidders’ confidence in the process is \nunderm ined by the inability to de termine whether IOUs are selec ting truly least-cost, best-fit \nprojects, or whether there is sign ificant subje ctivity in th e pro cess. Reduced confidence in the \nprocess redu ces the num ber of partic ipants in the process, wh ich redu ces com petition and \ndrives up costs. W e believe that the renewa bles and non-renewables procurem ent processes \nshould result in procurem ents that together meet RPS goals and overa ll energy needs at the \nleast-cost. The utilities should not select higher-cost renewables in order to m eet a particular \nsystem need if a com bination of low er-cost renewables and non-renewables can m eet those \nneeds at a lo wer overall cost. \n \n With a very transparent pr ocess, we would support the elimination of th e \nProcurement Review Group (PRG) . In the absence of such a process, however, the PRG is \nnecessary to provide som e degree of oversight of the process . The PRG has becom e an excuse \nfor secrecy, however, an d it should b e replaced w ith a transp arent pro cess. \n \n(c) The CAISO should be involved in pla nning transmission to meet R PS goals. \nWe agree with the Draft Report’s recomm endations (pp. 86, 99) that (a) the CPUC, the \nCommission and the CAISO should immediately investigate changes to the CA ISO tariff that \n 11 would allow recognition of transm ission needs no t only for reliability and econom ic projects, \nbut also to access renewable projects to m eet RPS goals, and (b) the three agencies should \ncooperate to revise the tran smission cost adder process for R PS procurem ent to m ore \naccurately reflect trans mission costs and re duce existing dis incentiv es for renewab les. \n \nIn recent comments at the CPUC, CalW EA enc ouraged that comm ission to request that \nthe CAISO consider the necessity of m eeting the state’s renewable energ y goals in th e \nplanning efforts it has underway.8 Specifically, the CAISO c ould in tegrate the work that it has \nalready done for the Tehachapi Collaborative Study Group (TCSG), and any sim ilar work for \nthe Im perial Valley Study Group, into their larger effort. W e also encouraged the CP UC to \nconsider taking form al action at FERC to ensu re that the CAISO’s future planning efforts \nencom pass state po licy g oals. \n \nIf the CAISO can proactively consider th e transm ission upgrades that w ould m ost \nefficiently connect th e largest con centrations of le ast-cost renewable resources, it could help to \nsolve th e problem s identif ied in the Draf t Repor t (p. 99)—nam ely, the failure of the C PUC to \nconsider the network benefits associated w ith transm ission upgrades, and the inappropriate \npractice of some utilities in load ing u pgrade cos ts onto renew ables b ids. For exam ple, a \nprelim inary analys is by the CAISO of a Tehach api-Midway connection recently prep ared for \nthe TCSG shows that the north-of-P ath-26 c ongestion previously estim ated by PG&E is \nvirtu ally elim inated when the Tehachapi wind res ource is effectiv ely in tegrated into the overa ll \nnetwork. The congestion estim ated by PG&E has resulted in the application of significant \ntransm ission adders to th e bids subm itted to PG&E f or Tehachapi wind re sources. If the \nCAISO can estim ate the costs and benefits associ ated with th e network upgrades required to \naccomm odate the s tate’s larges t renewable re source areas, it m ay reduce the im portan ce of \nquantifying network benefits and congestion costs. \n \n(d) The Draft Energy Report contains other usefu l reco mmen dations. Finally, we \nsupport the Draft Report’s recomm endations that the CPUC shoul d require IOUs to procure a \nprudent contract-risk m argin to avoid under-procu rement of renewable energy (p. 94); that the \nCPUC shoul d expeditiously com plete com pliance rules for ES Ps and CCAs (p. 90), and that \nthe legislature should adopt consis tent statewide RPS rules for public ly-owned utilities (p. 95). \n \n3. The Commission should identify addi tional actions that it could take \nto accelerate the RPS process \n \n In addition to the recomm endations addre ssed above, there are se veral addition al ways \nin which the Comm ission can and should advance the RPS goals, which should be reflected in \nthe final report. \n \n(a) The Commission should engage the CAI SO in its Intermittency Analysis \nProject. The Draft Energy Report references (p. 100) the work that the PIER program will be \nconducting over the next year to better understand and address the im pacts of integrating large \namounts of i ntermittent renewable resources in to California’s system . We strongly su pport \n \n8 “Comments of the Califo rnia Wind En ergy Association on Preliminary Scoping Me mo,” CP UC \nDocket I.05-0 9-005 (Septe mber 30, 20 05). \n 12 this ef fort. However, we are con cerned that this effort – the Interm ittency Analysis P roject \n(IAP) – is m issing an important opportunity to engage the CAISO at the highest levels to \nensure that it supports the m ethods that will be employed in the IAP effor t. The Draft Report \nstates (at p. 101) that “the CA ISO should undertake a research initiative to address m inimum \nload issu es, includ ing forecasting future m inimum load problem s, the number of annual even ts, \nand the dep th of the problem ” – but these issues w ill be s tudied in the IAP ef fort. Rather than \nencourage the CAISO to duplicate efforts, th e Comm ission should include the CAISO in its \nefforts to en sure tha t it will be com fortab le with the resu lts and can immediately take further \naction s from there. \n \n(b) The Commis sion s hould produce syst em integration cost information for \napplication to RPS bids. The RPS statu te requ ires tha t the u tilities consid er the sy stem \ninteg ration costs and cap acity v alues associated with renewable resource bids. To date, the \nCPUC has r elied upon infor mation from the CEC’s “California RPS Integration Cost Analysis \n– Phase I” study, which was an analysis of th e costs associated with existing renewable \nresources on the system . The decis ions that the C PUC must m ake on transm ission expansions, \nas well as ap provals of utility-s elected com petitiv e bids, will r equire integ ration co st \ninformation rela ted to signif icant ad dition al qua ntities of renewable re sources. As f ar as we \ncan determ ine, the Comm ission has no effort underway to produce this infor mation, which is \nneeded to advance the state’s RPS goals. We strongly encourage the Commission to ensure \nthat this inform ation is produced either as part of the IAP, or from a separate effort. This need \nshould be reflected in the final Energy Report. \n \n(c) The Commis sion s hould ensure that WREGIS tracks energy deliveries. The \ndraft report states (p. 97) that California should move toward full REC trading in the state and \nwestern region once WREGIS is in p lace and operational, and should, among other things, \n“assure energy is actually delivered. ” The Co mmission has not, however, taken steps to ensure \nthat W REGIS will ac tually have th e capability to track ene rgy delive ries,9 even though the \nNew England tracking system has dem onstrat ed that su ch tracki ng is possible. The \nComm ission should immediately take steps to ens ure that W REGIS will have this function. If \nCalifornia is to rea lize benefits from out-of-state generation, we m ust be sure that the power is \ndelivered to the state. \n \n (d) The Commis sion s hould develop gu idelin es for issuin g SEP payments. The \nComm ission has not yet develope d rules for how it will apply supplem ental energy paym ents \n(SEPs) to winning RPS bids that require them . Though we do not anticipate a great dem and \nfor SEP paym ents any tim e soon, the Comm ission can ensure that there w ill be no delays \nshould SEPs be required. One of the more difficu lt issues to be resolved is how SEPs on a 20-\nyear con tract will b e converted to a 1 0-year p ayment stream . \n \nD. The Draft Report’s Criticisms of FERC o n its Tehachapi Trunk Line \nDecision are Misguided \n \n \n9 A Commission staff person inf ormed us that the RFP soliciting bids to devel op the WRE GIS \nelectronic tra cking s ystem is limited to tracking renewable attributes (i.e., RECs) and not energ y. \n 13 The Draft Energy Report (at pp. E-8, 85, a nd 90) unfairly critic izes the FE RC for \nhaving “removed the prim ary instrum ent the stat e could have used to address transm ission \nconstraints for renewables” and for “effec tively bar[ring] the advanced planning and \nconstruction of transm ission facilities.” \n \nFirst, the FE RC was obligated to d eny Sout hern California E dison’s proposal for a new \ncatego ry of transm ission facility (called a “renewable-resou rce trunk line”) because SCE \ncharacterized it as being devoid of network bene fits. For FERC to have charged the cost of \nsuch an upgrade to transm ission custom ers as requested would have violated a long-standing \nand basic principal of the Federal Power Act: transm ission custom ers cannot be required to \npay for something that they do not benefit from . \n \n Second, FERC deserves significant credit for using its legal f lexibility to grant SCE’s \nrequest to enable it to build transm ission f acilities in advance o f generator interconnection \nrequests without incurring penalt ies should the f acilities be abandoned or cancelled. FERC \nhad no oblig ation to do this; it reached far be yond what it had ever done before, and should be \ncommended for it. In so doing, FERC did in fact enable advance planning and construction of \ntransm ission facilities by transm ission owners. \n \nThese issues are exp lained in detail in a memo analyzing the F ERC decision by \nCalWEA’s transm ission counsel, Scott Hem pling, which we attach here as Appendix 2. \n \nE. The Commission Should Focus on the Tools Available to the State to \nAchieve California’s R PS Transmission Goals \n \nRather than unfairly criticizing FER C, the final Energy Report should focus on the \nother recomm endations that the Draft Report m akes related to this issue -- m odifying the \nCAISO tariff to consider state policy goals (p. 86), and encouraging com prehensive \ntransm ission planning efforts by the Co mmission, the CPUC and the CAISO. \n \nThe final Energy Report should also expand its focus to two additiona l issues: the need \nfor the CPUC to use its statutory authority under PU Code Se ction 399.25 to (a) promote \ntransm ission upgrades that provide network bene fits while tapping the state’s m ajor renewable \nresource areas (with co sts therefore recovera ble from all transm ission custom ers), and (b) \nensure that those upgrades are fina nced by the transm ission owner. \n \nThis statutory provision of th e RPS legislation recognizes th e discretion inherent in the \nFERC’s criteria for “n etwork” st atus, providing the CPUC with th e ability to put before FERC \nargum ents that a facility should be designated “network” when that facility has both network \nand non-network characteristics. \n \nHad the CPUC m ade be tter us e of this code section, it could have found that SCE’s \n“trunk line” (Segm ent 3 of the Antelope project) has network characteris tics as well as gen-tie \ncharacteristics10 or, had the Comm ission not found such be nefits, it could have ordered SCE to \n \n10 Evidence of Segment 3’s network bene fits was put forward at FERC by CalWEA. \n \n 14 reconfigure the proposed facility so that it provided network benefits. S CE is now studying \njust such a reconfiguration.11 If taken ef fectively, these step s will resu lt in th e CPUC’s ability \nto meet California’s RPS goals without the need for m ajor changes in F ERC’s current \napproach to transm ission cost recovery.12 \n \n \n Respectf ully subm itted, \n \n \n \n ___________/s/____________ \n Nancy Rader \n Executive Director \n California Wind Energy Association \n 1198 Keith Avenue \n Berkeley, C A 94708 \n (510) 845-5077 \n nrader@calwea.org \n \n October 10, 2005\n \n11 SCE’s Gary Schoon yan stated at the Septem ber 12, 2005, E nergy Action Plan meeting that SCE is \nstudying a connection bet ween Seg ment 3 and t he Midway substat ion, which, he said, would provide \nthe network benefits that FERC requires if transm ission custom ers are to be charged for the fa cilities. \nCalWEA stro ngly supports this effort. \n \n12 For further discussion of these issue s, see Note 8, supra (CalWEA’ s comment s in CPUC D ocket \nI.05-09- 005). \n 15 APPENDIX 1 \n \nComments of the Califor nia Wind Energy Ass ociation \non \nCEC Staff Response to P ublic Comments \non the st aff report titled Assessment of Avi an Mortali ty from Collisions and Electrocutions \nwritten i n support of the 2005 E nvironmental Per forma nce Rep ort and the 2005 Int egrated \nEnergy P olicy Report \n (Staff Resp onse dated August 3 1, 2005 and poste d September 14, 2005) \n \nOctober 1 0, 2005 \n \nWhile we app reciate the st aff’s efforts to resp ond to the wind ind ustry’s c omments, \nstaff’s re sponse can be character ized a s an attempt t o obfu scate t he issue s to which they \npurport to re spond, even resort ing to an ad homine m attack.1 While volu minous, the Staff \nRespon se do es not add ress CalWE A’s thr ee maj or areas of concern : \n \n1. The 20 04 PIE R study, whic h forms the basis for staff policy reco mmendat ions, \nsensationaliz ed wind-facil ity-related avian mo rtality at the Altamont. The study was not \ndesigned to a ccurately cal culate fa cility-related avian mortality. Such a study would need to \ncontrol for background avian mort ality, use consistent search areas, empl oy more frequent \nsearch inter vals, and re move any car casses found so as not to dou ble- (or even triple-) count \nscavenged and moved c arcasses. These issue s are d iscussed in detail below. T he underlying \ndata used t o identify \"problem turbine s\" suffers from the sa me absence of controls f or \nincon sistent search frequencies and search areas, in consistent stu dy duration s, the likelihood \nof carcass double- (or tripl e-) counting, and potential ly even background mortal ity.2 \n \n \n1 Rather than adequately addre ss her specif ic, docu mented cr iticisms, the Sta ff Resp onse \nquestions (p. 6) the creden tials of one of the author s of our r emarks, Dr. Carol Weisskopf. \nStaff f ails to menti on that Weissk opf h as been con ducting inte rdisciplin ary stud ies with wildl ife \nbiologists since 1985, incl uding publi shed works. \n \n2 At the Octo ber 6 I EPR hearing, pr oponents of this st udy asse rted that (even if the mort ality \nestimate s are wrong), the mort ality associatio ns with particul ar turbines ( on which the \nproposed mitigation measures are b ased) are co rrect because the y were based on actual \ncarcasses found, not esti mates. We dis agree. Th e mortality a ssociations suffer fro m many of \nthe same flaws as the mortality estimates. \nCarcass coun ts were used to compare the relative ha zard of a variety of factors (e.g., \nturbine type, landscape features, tower type, etc.). The accu racy of this comp arison is \ncompromi sed by the variability in numbers of s earches, intervals betwee n searches, num ber of \nyears searches too k place and the ce rtainty that a mortality was att ributabl e to a particula r \nturbine. Fo r instan ce, search interval s varied from 13 to 139 days, and mo re carca sses would be \nfound at turbi ne or lan dscape feature s searche d at more fre quent intervals. It is likely that many \nfeature s ident ified as mo re hazard ous are an artifact o f these variati ons. The stud y authors \nacknowled ge that adjust ments were m ade to co rrect for the di fference in se arch eff ort, but it \ndoes n ot appear to us that the adjustments were made accu rately enough to ju stify re moving \nor relocat ing turbines. (Th e level of accuracy of the adjust ments i s a quest ion that we would \nlike the inde pendent review to answer.) \n One thing is clear: when a large d ata set is bein g used to determine relatively small \ndifference s in the statist ics, it is impe rative to minimize the va riability in the things over w hich \nthe resear cher has c ontrol -- in this cas e, most importantly the search inte rvals, search \ndiameter and the seasonal issue. As we have shown, there were large varian ces in each of \nthese are as. \n \n CalWEA Appendix 1 - Pag e 1 2. Staff i gnores the differ ence between the tu rbine m odels oper ating in the Alta mont and \nthose use d elsewhere. Ne w wind parks are not constructed with obsolete turbines. A \ntheoretical siting model, based on tiny turbin es and faulty data, cannot, therefore, form the \nbasis for eith er Alta mont-s pecific or st atewide s iting guideline s or require ments. \n \n3. Staff’s re commendat ion th at statew ide guideline s should be ado pted to guide the \nsiting, oper ation and monitoring of new wind develo pments is a solution in sea rch of a \nproble m. There is n o indication that C EC staff or consultants have studied local sitin g \nprocesses in Calif ornia, le t alone pro vided eviden ce that they are not workin g. Wind fac ility-\nrelated av ian mort ality in the Altam ont is unique an d isolated. And yet, staff has used the \nAltamont pr oblem a s a backdro p for recommen dations for statew ide av ian gu idelines and t he \ndevelop ment of m itigation measures outside of the Altamont. Staff ha s not st udied s iting \nprocesses outside of the Al tamont, let alone supported state ments such a s “developing \nmitigation measure s for implementati on would allo w for continu ed use of the wind resources in \nSolano Count y,”3 which erroneou sly implies that cont inued use of the wind resource in Solan o is \nnot presently possible, an d overl ooks the fact that S olano C ounty is alre ady imposing m itigation \nmeasures for avian impacts. \n \nThe staf f finds “puzzling ” a request tha t its recommenda tion for statewide guideli nes should \nbenefit by a full and adequate review by the pu blic before becoming Co mmission policy (PDF-\npage 1 1) despite the fa ct that staf f did not indi cate, in docu ment s feed ing int o the I EPR, which \nset of e xisting guidelin es ought to be a dopted f or statewide us e, how they sho uld be applie d, \nor whether st aff mean s to sugge st that an entire ly new set of gu idelines sh ould be develop ed.4 \nMoreo ver, the only justifi cation staff offer f or such guideline s is that “Current ly, siting win d \ndevelopment s at the local level is in consist ent.” (PDF-page 11.) Inconsisten cy, however, is \nperfectly ap propriate a s it merely refle cts completely different local circumstan ces requ iring \ndifferent siting policie s. \n \nDiscussi on of Item 1: The 2004 st udy was not designed t o accurately calculate facility-\nrelated avian mortality \n \nThere are several indicat ions in the Staff Resp onse that the 2004 P IER study by Smallwood and \nThelander was not designe d to estimate Altamo nt Pass wind- facility-related avian mortality.5 \nYet, staff d oes not dir ectly acknowledg e this fa iling or propose to retract the e stimate s that \nthe study gratuitously produced. The estimates are exaggerated and have bee n widely quoted \nin the medi a. \n \nWe would like to state on ce ag ain that we do not deny that wind facility-related avian \nfatalities in the Altam ont Pass are o f great con cern. Inflam mato ry estim ates of those fat alities, \nhowever, do nothing to solve the proble m. \n \n \n3 California E nergy Commis sion Staf f Report, “ 2005 Environment al Perfor mance Report o f \nCaliforn ia’s E lectrical Syst em” at p. 16 (CEC-700-2005-016). June 2005. \n \n4 In the Staff Respon se at PDF-page 149, it does f inally becom e clear that sta ff intends to \ndevelop a wholly new set of gu ideline s, duplicat ing years of effort by the NWCC and the CEC’s \nown sta ff. \n \n5 See, e.g., Staff Re sponse PDF-page 1 10, wherein a memo from Linda Spie gel and Shawn \nSmallwood st ates, “we bel ieve it is inappropriat e to conve rt our fatality dat a to mortality \nestimate s … We disagree with your stated in tention to convert these data t o mort ality \nestimate s at the turbine string or individual turbine l evel, includin g turbines wh ere fatal ity \nsearches wer e perfo rmed less than one year.” \n \n CalWEA Appendix 1 - Pag e 2 The next two subse ctions expla in the inadeq uacy of the staff re sponses to C alWEA’s \ndocumented errors on gol den eagle mortality estimates and the use of e xcessive corre ction \nfactors as exemplified by the cowbird mortality estimate; the third sub section explain s why, \ncontr ary to st aff’s explan ation, ba ckground mort ality should have been as sessed at the \nAltamont. \n \na. Golde n eagle example \n \nThe mo st basic of exaggerations is foun d in th e 2004 PIER study’s estimate s of golden eagle \nmortality. In an attach ment to this app endix, Wei sskopf e xplains why the Staff Respon se fails \nto answe r our charge that the study inflated the number of gold en eagle deat hs at the \nAltamont by a factor of three. \n \nIn summ ary, Weis skopf had shown a s ignificant di screpancy betw een two sets of dat a used in \nthe 2004 stud y, one of which cau sed th e overall golden eagle mortality rate to greatly excee d \nthat produ ced by all previous studies w e have seen, includin g an NREL rep ort by the same \nauthor s now i n press . The 2004 study explain s that t he high er mortality rate s in that report as \ncompared to an NREL report by the same authors that used some of the same data is due to a \nparticular set of turbine s that the authors cla im subst antially ex ceeds the m ortality ove r most \nof the rest of the pass. Bu t Weissk opf showed th at this set of turbines is not within the data \nset that produced the high er mortality rate , and therefore cannot explain the higher rate. \nInstead of attemptin g to determin e the source of th e discrepan cy between the two sets of \ndata—which r esulted in the fact or-of-three erro r—the Staff Resp onse in stead accu ses Weis skopf \nof tran sposing figu res in h er calcul ations. Bu t in the attached re sponse, Weisskopf explain s \nthat, first, th ere was no such transposition an d, more importantly, the suppose dly transpose d \nfigure s are irrelevant because they should have been excluded from the calcul ation. \n \nMoreo ver, sta ff continues t o state that mortality estimate s were d erived from fatalit ies caused \nby collision with moving bl ades, and tha t carcasses “show injurie s specific to th is source suc h \nas severed b ody parts and torsos cut in half” (Staff R esponse, PDF-page 3). Staff goes on to \nstress that “ fatalit ies that could not be attribut ed to turbine blade collision wer e omitted fr om \nthe analysi s” (Staff Resp onse, PDF-page 3). This claim is astonishing given that, of the Set 2 \nturbine ca rcasses used t o develop Altamont mortality estim ates (staff p rotestations aside, the \nSet 1 data has not yet bee n made available to us ), 43% were classified as feath ers, 3% a s old \nrema ins, 18% as complete carcasses, 2% as dec apitated, 1% as d ismembered and 12% as wings. \n \nIn the field comments, 48% descr ibed t he carc ass as having unkn own injuries becau se the \ncarcass wa s missing, 4% s tated si mply unknown injuries, 4% descr ibed the ca rcass as ha ving \nunknown injuries due t o scavenging, an d 9% were described as having unk nown injuries because \npart or most of the ca rcass was missing (e.g., “Unknown injuries. Only tail fea thers foun d.” \n“Unknown inj uries. Only leg bones and few feat hers present.” “Unknown injuries. Part of \ncarcass missing and decayed.” “Unknown injuries. Only partial left wing, bon es and \nfeathers.”). \n \nThe nature of the injury was listed for only 47 of 131 carcasses. Of these, 6 (13%) were listed as \nhavin g no inj ury apparent. Only 41 (31% ) had in juries that could b e considere d eviden ce of \nwind fa cility- related m ortality. \n \nb. Cowbir d example \n \nWhen CalWEA reviewed t he 2004 PIER report, we questioned how 919 carcasses found during 4+ \nyears o f a stu dy could lead to spec ies-specific mortality estim ates that added u p to mo re than \n10,900 birds per year. We docu mented cowb irds as an exam ple of how the fou nd car casses \n CalWEA Appendix 1 - Pag e 3 were extra polated into overall mo rtalit y estim ates.6 The cowb ird was sele cted becau se the \nreport pre sented a turbine mort ality fa ctor for cowbirds in the Set 2 data, pr oviding a s imple \nexample as there was onl y one carcass in the Set 2 data, and the Set 2 data w ere the only data \nto which CalWEA was provided ac cess. The absurdit ies of the distance of the carcass to th e \nnearest turb ine, the error in the turbin e power rating and the magnitude of the final mort ality \nestimate were product s of the selection , not the reason for it. \n \nStaff’s focus on these i ssues distracts from the ir failure to con vincingly add ress the ma in point \nof the examp le: that an exce ssive number of overly large correction fa ctors was used f or the \nSet 2 turbine s. The 20 04 PIER report was f orced to employ an e xcessively large scavenger \ncorrection factor be cause the se arch in tervals ( i.e., number of days between searches) for the \nSet 2 turbine s were three month s, as compared t o the two- to four-week intervals that are \nstandard practice in mode rn avian mort ality stud ies. Shorter se arch interval s avoid the need to \nuse large scavenger corre ction factors. The NWCC Guideline s do not include r ecommended \nstudy intervals, but do recommend (on p. 22) th at study method s be selected t o minimize bi as \nin the outcome of the study, and that bias can be t olerated only if it is relatively small, \nmeasurable, or consistent among study areas , which are not ch aracteristics of the Set 2 data \nextrap olations. \n \nRegard ing some of the pa rticula rs: \n \n• CalWEA continues to believe a carcass found 430 fe et from the nearest turbine should \nnot have been used in mortality calcul ations, and that doublin g the mort ality estimate \nis particul arly unjustified given the dist ance betwee n the carcass and the turbine. \n \n• The Staff Re sponse (PDF-p age 1 60) states, “The mortality esti mates for bird species, \nincludin g the brown-head ed cowb ird, were mad e only for bird species with more than \none turbine-caused fatalit y.” This state ment is at odds with the 2004 PIER report (p. \n70), which p rovides a Set 2 turbine mortality fa ctor for the s ingle cowbi rd found in that \nset. \n \n• The Staff Re sponse adds ( PDF-page 162), “It is not true that only one turbine s tring \nincluded a br own-headed cowb ird, and it is not true that Smallwood and Thel ander \n(2004) m istakenly identifi ed a 65-kW tur bine as a 150-kW turbine model. ” The CalWEA \ncowb ird document nowhere states that only one string included a brown-headed \ncowb ird, alth ough the dat a and the 2004 re port both indicate that only one cowbird \ncarcass was found in the Set 2 turbines. The error in turbine MW value was al so \nidentif ied independently in ”Reply Co mments of Cal ifornia Wind C ompanies on the \nCommittee W orkshop of Ju ne 27-28, 2005” (p. 59). \n \nIn closin g comment s, the Staff Res ponse (PDF-page 167) state s, “Reportin g the range o f \nestimate s as well as the a ctual number of fat alities gives the reviewer all the facts. We isskopf \ncould have made her argument usin g the lower range rather than the higher range, and not \ndoing so was mislead ing.” Although this statemen t is not relevant to the docu mentation of the \ncowb ird fatality extrap olations, we agree with the comment. On the other han d, CalWEA’s \nfocus on the high-end m ortality esti mate is consistent with widesp read rep orting of the high-\nend mort ality estim ates of all birds an d raptor death s in the 2004 PIER report, which are \nrepeated in C EC staf f documents, pre sentation s to planning commissioners, lit igant fil ings and \nmedia report s. The general public does not he ar, for ex ample, abo ut the 3 63 raptor c arcasses \nfound during more than four years of st udy; rather, they hear about the estimated 880 to \n1,300 annu al raptor deaths in the Altamont. \n \n6 For exampl e (looking at set 2 carcasses only), the cowbird turn ed into 300 cowbirds, \neach burr owing owl turned into 6 0, and each bla ckbird turned i nto 12 0. \n CalWEA Appendix 1 - Pag e 4 \nc. B ackgroun d mortal ity \n \nAmong the ju stifications for omitting assessment of backgr ound a vian m ortality, CEC staff r efer \n(p. 162) to other studie s, e.g., one at B uffalo Ridge in Minnesota, that dis count backgr ound \nmortality. B ut circu mstances at other area s do no t justify the same pract ice at the Altamont. \nThere are a n umber of differences, for example, between the avi an situat ion at Buffalo Rid ge \nand the Altamont. \n \nBuffalo Ridge carcass counts were low a t both refere nce and turbi ne sites, an d there were no \navian concerns at Buffal o Ridge even w ithout adjustment for background mortality. There was \nno need fo r discussions o f turbine di smantlin g or relocat ions, operational curt ailment, \ncontr ibutions to mit igation funds or law suits. Sin ce these opt ions are under di scussion in the \nAltamont, a c loser investigation of the Buffalo Ridge data i s warr anted. \n \nOf the 5, 322 fatality sear ches at Bu ffalo Ridge, 46.6% took plac e at referen ce sites and 5 3.4% \nat turbine s ites.7 On refe rence site s, 31 carcasses were found (0. 0125 carcasses/search) and 55 \ncarcasses (0.0194 carcasses/search) w ere found at turbine s ites. The three phase s of the \nBuffalo R idge project had different mortality estimat es, with phase 1 having an annual \nmortality of 0.98 bird s per turbine, phase 2 h aving 2.27 bird s per turbine, an d phase 3 w ith \n4.45 bird s per turbine. Th e reference site avian m ortality esti mate was 1. 10 deaths per \nturbine-equivalent site per year, higher than that for the phase 1 t urbines. Adjusting f or \nbackg round r ates would h ave completely eliminate d turbine-relat ed avian mortality for the \nphase 1 turbines, reduced by half the mortality estimate for the phase 2 turbin es, and reduced \nby one quart er the mort ality estimate for the phase 3 turbine s. \n \nBecause they were so low, Buffalo Rid ge mort ality estimates, unadjusted or n ot, were of lit tle \nconsequence, so elimin ating the cost for referenc e site searches w as an ea sy de cision to m ake. \nIf carcasses were found a t reference sites in the Altamont equivalent to half or one quarter of \nthe numbers found at turbine sites, the consequenc es would be n o longer trivial, and the cost \nfully justified. Unlike the Buffalo R idge case, however, the 2004 PIER study ne ver investigat ed \nbackground mort ality. \n \n[Please see separate Attach ment to this appendix.]\n \n7 Johnson G.D ., W.P. Erickson, M.D. Strickla nd, M.F. Shepherd and D.A. Shepherd, Avian \nmonitoring at the Buffal o Ridge, Minne sota w ind res ource area: R esults o f a 4-year study, \nSeptember 2000, p. iv. \n CalWEA Appendix 1 - Pag e 5 APPENDIX 2 \n \n \nMEMORANDUM \n \n \nTO: Nancy Rader, CalW EA \nFROM: Scott Hem pling, Law Offices of Scott Hem pling, P.C. \nDAT E: July 11, 2005 \nRE: Thoughts on FERC’s Antelope Decision \n \n \nThis m emorandum discussed the FE RC's deci sion on SCE' s request for favorable rate \ntreatment of the Antelop e Projec t upgrades.1 \n \nPart I provides an overview of the FERC decision. \nPart II contains m y comm ents on the decision. \nPart III contains m y comments on the concur rence of Comm issioner Brownell. \nPart IV offers suggestions for next steps. \nAn Appendix contains descriptions of the th ree u pgrade segm ents at issu e. \n \n \n1) Overview of Decision \n \nIn this case, SCE asked FERC to \"roll in \" to its tr ansm ission rates the cos t of the \nAntelope Project.2 The Antelope Project consists of three up grades to SC E's transm ission \nsystem . SCE labels these upgrades S egment 1, Segm ent 2 and Segm ent 3.3 \n \nIn addition to roll-in, SC E sought, for all th ree segm ents, FERC' s comm itments for full \nrecovery of prudently-incurred costs, regardless of whether pot ential wind generation develops \nor SCE abandons or cancels one or m ore of the segm ents. SCE sought this comm itment because \nFERC has a preceden t requiring a utility to bea r half the prude nt cost of a projec t where the \nproject is abandoned or canceled du e to lack of dem and. The intent of this policy is to assure \nthat u tilities m anage their busines s risks carefully rather than view the ratepayer as the guarantor \nof all cost recovery. \n \n1 Southern California Edison Company , \"Order on Petition for Declaratory Order,\" Docket No. \nEL05-80- 000, 112 FERC p ara. 61,014 (July 1, 2005). \n2 ARoll-in @ is the ter m of art used to describe the inclus ion of particular costs in the cost of service \nused to set a utilit y's rates. In the conte xt of u pgrade s caused by interconnec ting generators, the opposite \nof \"roll-in\" is \"direct assignment.\" Direct assign ment means the int erconnecting generator pays for the \nupgrade; \"roll -in\" m eans that all transm ission user s (including the i nterconnecting generator o r its \ncusto mer) pa y for the upgrade. \n3 These three seg ments are described in the Appendix to this m emorandum . \n CalWEA Appendix 2 - Pag e 1 \n CalWEA Appendix 2 – p. 2 \na) Segments 1 and 2 \n \nFERC approved roll-in because the upgrades ar e integrated with, and operate in parallel \nwith, the transmission network. FERC stated (par a. 36, citing SCE's affidavit submitted by Jorge \nChacon): \n \n\"36. Segments 1 and 2 are upgrades to existing, high-voltage, network \ntransmission facilities or upgrades that will operate in parallel with existing \nhigh-voltage, network transmission facilities and these two segments will be transmission facilities that can be full y integrated with the CAISO-Controlled \nGrid when constructed and placed under CAISO Operational Control.\" \n \n\"37. Segment 1 includes a new 25.6 mile 500 kV transmission line between the existing Antelope and Pardee substations , single and double circuit towers that \nwill be energized initially at 220 kV, and an expansion of the Antelope substation \nto accommodate the new 500 kV rating. Segment 2 includes a new 17.8 mile 500 \nkV transmission line between the existing Antelope and Vincent substations and \nupgrades such as transformers, circuit breakers, and disconnect switches \nnecessary at both substations to terminate the new transmission line. These two \nsegments are not radial in nature, and will be part of the looped transmission system where the energy would flow from their substations (from Antelope to \nPardee substations for Segment 1 and from Antelope to Vincent substations for Segment 2), but can be reversed depe nding on the season and the generation on \nline. These new facilities will be integr ated with the existing Big Creek 220 kV \ncorridor and the available capacity of these facilities will be used for multiple \npurposes, e.g., serve load and increase tr ansfer capacity for existing generation \nfacilities.\" \n \n\"38. According to SCE, Segments 1 and 2 will provide additional benefits to the \ntransmission grid; for example, they will increase the transfer capability, eliminate \nor mitigate thermal and transient stabili ty problems under certain conditions, and \ncan be relied upon for CAISO scheduling purposes. No other party disputes this \nassertion. In addition, the CAISO will be ab le to provide servic e to Participating \nTransmission Owners as well as other transmission customers over the two \nsegments. Segments 1 and 2 will provide cap ability and reliability benefits to the \ntransmission grid and could be relied on for coordinated operation of the grid. \nTherefore, we find that Segments 1 a nd 2 are network upgrades, the costs of \nwhich are discussed further below, a nd may be recovered through SCE's TRR.\" \n \nFERC promised that there will not be a prude nce disallowance if th ere is cancellation or \nabandonment should sufficient wind generation not appear. Para. 58 (\"We will, however, grant \nSCE's request and allow it to r ecover 100 percent of th e prudent cost (as discussed above) of \nSegments 1 and 2 even if these faci lities are abandoned or cancelled.\"). \n \n CalWEA Appendix 2 – p. 3 FERC deferred ruling on whether the size of Segments 1 and 2 is prudent; SCE can \nre-ask for this ruling after it obtains a certificate of conve nience and necessity from the \nCalifornia PUC. See para. 57: \n \n\"... The CPUC has not completed its revi ew for the certific ate(s) of public \nconvenience and necessity. Nor has the CA ISO, as regional system operator, \nweighed in on all aspects of this project . Accordingly, we will defer on the issue \nof advance prudence with regard to the appropriate sizing of Segments 1 and 2 \nuntil after the CPUC has granted SCE th e necessary certificate(s) of public \nconvenience and necessity\" (also noting, in n.43, that \"SCE is not seeking an \nadvance prudence call on the actual cost of the Antelope Project\").” \n \nb) Segment 3 \n \nFERC denied all of SCE =s requests because the f acility is a gen-tie which does not benefit \nthe network. FERC expressly relied on SCE's own statements: \n \nGiven the information provided by SCE, we find that Segment 3 is not a network \nupgrade and therefore, not eligible for rolled -in rate treatment. Further, as noted \nby various intervenors, these appear to be generation-tie facilities, and our \nprecedent has been that it would be improper to shift the costs of such facilities \nfrom the interconnection customers to al l users of the transmission grid. In \naddition, SCE has neither shown that all us ers of the CAISO-Controlled grid will \nreceive the benefits of these facilities nor how Segment 3 will provide benefits to the grid. We also do not have a determination from CAISO on whether these \nfacilities should be transferre d to its Operational Control.\" \n \nPara. 42 (emphasis added). The \"informati on provided by SCE\" included (as summarized by \nFERC): \n \n[para. 22] \"SCE characterizes Segment 3 as a generation-tie line, the cost of \nwhich is ordinarily paid by interconnecting generators. However, it contends that \nsuch a policy is a barrier to entry for wi nd resources located in remote areas for \nseveral reasons: (1) the large capital outlays are not feasible and add \nunacceptable financial risk; (2) incremental transmission upgrades based on first-in-queue is ineffective for loca tions where renewable resources tend to \nlocate; and (3) clustering of interconnection applications to have jointly-owned or \njointly-funded transmission upgrades is unlikely.\" \n \n[para. 24] \"SCE says that the lines an d substations are high voltage (initially \noperated at 220 kV, with an actual rating of 500 kV), will reach approximately 35 \nmiles from the last point on the existing 220 kV grid to the second new substation, \nand will extend the grid to a large concen tration of potential renewable resources \nfrom the Tehachapi region that the CPUC has found necessary to meet the state's \nrenewable procurement objectives.\" \n CalWEA Appendix 2 – p. 4 \n[para. 40] ... \"[T]o take advantage of economies of scale, SCE has designed the \nSegment 3 facilities to serve the multip le interconnection customers that may \ndevelop generation projects in the Te hachapi area. And, although Segment 3 \nfacilities are high voltage facilities, they do not operate in parallel with existing \ntransmission facilities.\" \n \nFERC then added, at n.33: \n \n\"We note that SCE has stated that if th e Commission does not allow recovery of \nthe cost of the Antelope Project in general transmission rates, the CPUC is to \nallow SCE to recover the reasonable transmission costs in retail rates. \nCal.Pub.Util.Code sec. 399.25(b)(2).\"23 \n \n \n2) Comments on the Decision \n \na) Segments 1 and 2 \n \nFERC promised not to penalize SCE by disall owing costs in case of abandonment or \ncancellation. FERC here used its legal flexibility to help wind without committing legal error. \nFERC could have said \"let's wait until cancellation or abandonment occurs and then see what the \nfacts were.\" FERC had no obliga tion to grant SCE's request. FE RC precedent in fact requires \nthe utility to absorb half th e cost of abandonment or cancellation. But FERC interpreted this \nprecedent flexibly. The reason why FERC has hist orically held a utility 50% accountable for \nabandonment or cancellation is that these decisions are within th e utility's control, and FERC \nwants utilities to exercise contro l carefully, sharing risks with its customers. Here, SCE correctly \nargued, and the FERC correctly agre ed, that the reasons for can cellation or abandonment would \nbe outside the utility's control. The reasons would include generators not appearing in sufficient number, or appearing an d then disappearing. \n \n \n23 This footnote is odd (separate from mis-citing the relevant provision, which is §399.25(b)(4 )). \nIt has no legal relevance. Whether the Federal Power Act allows recovery from transmission ratepayers is \nlegally unaffected by state law. Under the FPA, tr ansmission ratepayers pay for an upgrade if they \nreceive benefits from it upgrade. FERC found there are no transmission ratepayer benefits from the \nupgrade; therefore they cannot be forced to pay for it. State law has nothing to do with it. Since the events leading to a decision to abandon or cancel would be outside the \nutility' s control, FERC granted SCE's reques t to be insulated f rom the tra ditional 50% \ncost dis allowance. \n \nContrast FE RC's reasoning with inte rest group argum ents m ade by som e \nintervenors. Had FERC said \"we' re granti ng SCE' s request because we want to help \nrenewable s,\" FERC would have co mmitted leg al error. Ou tside of PURPA, FERC has no \nlegal authority to single out a form of electric generation for special treatm ent.24 Instead \nFERC stuck with its n on-renewables preceden t but used a leg itimate open ing. \n \nThe size of the facility gave FERC pause. See para. 57. FERC cannot award a \nblank check. The FPA does not allow FERC to make transm ission ratepayers pay f or a \nfacility of any size, just b ecause the state of California or ders that size. FERC has an \nindependent obligation to assure that transm ission ratepayers are not paying for m ore \nfacility than they need. It is one thin g to say that an upgrad e stim ulated by an \ninterconnecting generato r will in crease reliab ility and theref ore benefit all transm ission \nusers; it' s another thing to m ake transm ission custom ers pay for m ore capacity than is \nneeded by th e full load. FERC therefore wit hheld full approval until the P UC issues a \ncertificate of public convenien ce and necessity. P ara. 57. This statem ent does not m ean \nthat FERC will nec essarily approve all co sts just because the PUC has granted th e \ncertificate; it means that FE RC wants to see a full record supporting the size before \nacting. CalWEA shoul d theref ore consider participating in the CPCN pr oceeding to \nensure that this record is provided. \n \nb) Segment 3 \n \nOn Segm ent 3, SCE left FERC unable to show flexibility. \n \nTo the extent FERC looked only at S CE's subm ission and forgot about CalW EA's, \nFERC' s decision was correct, and easily predictable. There is no budging on the \nprinciple that transm ission rates can reflect only those investm ents that benefit the \ntransm ission ratep ayer. Once SCE characte rized Segm ent 3 as perform ing only a gen-tie \nfunction, as a non-network facility not integr ated with the grid, there was no way for \nFERC to avoid denying the requ est for roll-in. For the m any opponents o f SCE' s filing, \nSCE' s subm ission m ade defeating us on Segm ent 3 a sim ple matter of quoting SCE. It \nthen took F ERC exactly one paragraph to explain itself. \n \n \n24 It is true that FERC is try ing to m ake transm ission costs more reasonable for \ninterm ittent power: but FE RC's legal technique f or doing so -- t he right technique -- is not \"we \nlike renewables\" but \"we are not goi ng to allow transmission owners to im pose penalties on \nintermittency which are excessive in relat ion to the effects of inter mittency . In other words, \nFERC continues to focus on assigning c osts fa irly. The benefit to wind from FERC's \ninterm ittency decisions is that FERC stepped in rather than leave the matter to transm ission \nproviders who were less committed to resolving the problem . \n \n CalWEA Appendix 2 – p. 5 FERC cannot lawf ully a ssign to tran smission custom ers any costs which do not \nproduce benefits for those costs. This princi ple is not arguable or negotiable. FERC' s \npowers are lim ited by statute. T ransm ission ra tes m ust be just and reasonable. Courts \nhave found that rates are not just and reasonable if they include costs which are not \nassociated w ith benefits to the ratepayer. \n \nWhen we talk of benef its to the ratep ayer, we ar e talk ing abou t the ratep ayer \nbuying the service at issue -- here, transm ission service. It m akes no difference to the \ntransm ission ratepayer -- in hi s role as transm ission ratep ayer -- tha t the state is attrac ting \nmore generation or increasing the diversity of that genera tion. These concerns are not \nFederal Pow er Act concerns. \n \nThere is no lawful way to create a Athird category, @ as SCE sought to do. Under \nthe Federal Power Act, there are only two catego ries of facility: the f acility eithe r benefits \nthe network or it does not. The unm ovable principle is that you cannot make \ntransm ission ratepayers pay for som ething unle ss it gives them benef its. Yes, there can \nbe m ultiple ways to sho w network benef its. But there m ust be network b enefits: \notherwise, no roll-in. To say Athere are no network benefits bu t there are plenty of oth er \nreasons to charge transm ission ratepayers @ is asking FERC to do the legally im possible. \n \nThe only way for a roll-in argum ent to have survived SCE' s subm ission was for \nFERC to disregard it, in favor of an alte rnative subm ission. T hat was the purpose of \nCalW EA's subm ission o f Whit Russell' s affidavit, explaining the network benefits of \nSegm ent 3. \n \n \n3) Comments on the Concurren ce of Commiss ioner Brownell \n \n Comm. Brownell' s concurrence asserts that the proposal would have greater \nchance of success if the proposal com es from the CA ISO, using Order 2003' s \n\"independent entity\" variation. If the CA ISO takes this route, the CA ISO should \nexplain that Segm ent 3 will prov ide network be nefits of the type typic ally requir ed by \nFERC as a prerequ isite for roll-in. Otherwise, we are likely to see a repeat of FERC’s \ninitial rejection. \n \n The m ajority rejected S CE's subm ittal not because SCE is a non-independent \ntransm ission provider, b ut becaus e the subm ittal disclaim ed any network benefits. T he \nmajority' s brief explanation of its rejec tion said nothing about independent vs. non-\nindependent status. \n \n Comm. Brownell' s concurrence does not a ddress the network benefits problem . \nThe concurrence states that these facilitie s were not envisioned by Order 2003, in that \nthey are siz ed in advance to accommodate m ultiple gene rators. It des cribes this type of a \nfacility as a \"m ultiple-us e on-ram p to th e CAISO Grid, rath er than as so le-use \ninterconnection facilities.\" This description does not rescue the facility from the m ajority \nopinion, which rejects ro ll-in becau se the benefi ts of the line are not network benefits. \n \n CalWEA Appendix 2 – p. 6 That m ore than one generator uses the lin e, and that the advance construction and \nfinancing of the line is \"beyond the means of any one developer,\" does not respond to the \nmajority' s view (which itself is supported by decades of FERC a nd court opinions) that \nroll-in requires benefits to the transm ission network, not to the interconnecting \ngenerators. \n \n Recognizing the necessity of network benefits, the concurrence m akes this \nattem pt to sa ve Segm ent 3: \n \n\"Segm ent 3 facilities would provide be nefits to a ll use rs of the CAISO \nGrid by cre ating th e pote ntial to in terconnect significant new and diverse \nsupplies of energy. Therefore, I beli eve that this proposal would have \nsatisfied the independent entity vari ation standard in Order No. 2003, had \nit been m ade by the CAISO....\" \n \nThis passage has two problem s. First, it does not distinguish this facility from any non-\nintegrated gen-tie. Any gen-tie interconnect s new generation; but an interconnection role \nalone does not create network benefits. For ne twork benef its to exis t, the transm ission \nratepayer m ust benefit in his role as a tran smission custom er, not in his role as a pow er \ncustom er. \n \n Second, the next sentence does not follo w from the first. The second sentence \nimplies that the in tercon nection of new ge neration som ehow inter acts with independent \nentity status to support roll-i n. But as discussed above, the ability to roll-in depends on \nnetwork benefits; roll-in has nothing to do w ith independent status. FERC created the \nindependen t entity variation option b ecause independent en tities h ave no incentive to \ndiscrim inate. See Order 2003 at para. 822 (\" RTO or ISO should be treated differently \nbecause an independent RTO or ISO does not raise the sam e level of con cern regard ing \nundue discrim ination.\"). The di scrimination of concern to FE RC was discrim ination by a \ngeneration-owning transm ission provider agains t independent generators. Here, SCE is \nseeking to have its own ratepayers bear cost s that generators m ight otherwise provide. \nSCE' s proposal does not involve discrim ination against generators. The independent \nentity standard has nothing to do with this matter (as evid enced by the ab sence of any \nmention of t he issue in the m ajority' s decision). \n \n Conclusion: Since the independent-nonindependent di stinction had no effect on \nthe m ajority' s decision (n or should it have, because roll-in d epends on network benefits, \nnot on who contro ls the line ), it is ne cessary for the CA ISO, if it does m ake the r efiling, \nto adjus t the Segm ent 3 plan so th at ne twork benefits are clear. Moreover, the \n\"independent entity vari ation\" is not available to shift non-network costs from generators \nto transm ission custom ers. The requirem ent that transm ission custom ers bear cos ts only \nto the extent those costs bene fit the n etwork is ro oted in the F PA's \"just and reasonable\" \nrequirem ent. The flexibility g ranted by Order 2003 to independent entities cannot v iolate \nthat standard. \n \n \n \n CalWEA Appendix 2 – p. 7 IV. Possible Next Steps on Segment 3 \n \nThere are th ree poss ible ways to pay fo r Segm ent 3: transm ission ratepayers, \nretail ratepayers, and in terconnecting generators. \n \na) Transmission ratepayers \n \nAllocating S egment 3 costs to transm ission ratepayers requires a FERC de cision. \nFERC can m ake this decision only if it finds benefits to transm ission ratepayers. FE RC \nwill m ake that f inding on ly if it views Segm ent 3 as integra ted with the tra nsmission \nnetwork. Having read only SCE' s position on this point, FE RC adopted SCE' s view that \nSegm ent 3 is non-network. \n \nCalWEA' s submission possibly can solve th is problem . Our filing included an \naffidavit from engineer Whit Ru ssell. The affidavit sought to create a factual basis f or a \nfinding that Segm ent 3 would be integrated with the network. FERC appears to have \nmisplaced CalW EA's filing. Although it listed CalW EA along with the o ther interveno rs, \nit did no t summarize our position s although it su mmarized th e positions o f others. FERC \nopinions always summarize the un ique position s of each intervenor. W e should seek \nrehearing for purposes of havi ng the Comm ission take our affi davit into account. If we \ndo seek rehearing, by statute we m ust do so no later than August 1, 2005. \n \nIt would be better, however , to have SCE (and its witn ess Jo rge Chacon) (or the \nCA ISO) adopt som e version of W hit's views. FERC will have difficulty accepting o ur \nposition because it has already gone on r ecord accepting SCE 's position. Our opponents \nwill a rgue in Court tha t FERC changed its m ind ar bitrarily. If it's SCE that m odifies its \nposition, we have a better shot. SCE’s m odification would take the form of a revised \napplication. It could subm it this revised a pplication in two possibl e ways: (a) in the \npresent proceeding, as a petition for rehearing (due 30 days after FERC’s order); or (b) by \ninitiating a n ew proceeding. If SCE chose (a), and if the m odifications were substantial, \nFERC likely would issue a new public no tice allowing new in terventions and \nopportunities for comme nts. \n \nMy recommendation is to try to persua de SCE and Mr. Chacon that they are \nlooking too narrowly at the FERC criteria for network treatment. It is not a black-white \nsituation, i.e., gen-tie v. netw ork. Although there is not clea r preceden t, I think we can \nfairly argue that a facility can have a gen-tie role but also play an integration role. But \nwe need SCE (or the C A ISO) to agree to h elp, rather than offer arguments which F ERC \ncannot legally accep t, ever. \n \nWhat we should not do is repeat argum ents that are legally irrelevant. The \nfollowing argum ents, as paraphrased below by FERC, invite F ERC to reject Segm ent 3 \nagain, us ing language that will b e unhelpful in the future. Thes e argum ents also expose, \nand em phasize, the ab sence of evidence from SCE that Segment 3 has network benefits. \n \n \n CalWEA Appendix 2 – p. 8 [para. 23] \"... SCE suggests creating a new \"narrow and specific category \nof transm ission facilities,\" i.e., trunk facilities that would include projects \nlike Segm ent 3. SCE argues that the costs of high-voltage (220 kV or \nhigher) trunk facilities to interconnect and integrat e large concentrations \nof potential renewable generation resources loca ted in a lim ited \ngeographic area, but a r easonable distance from the existing grid, should \nbe eligible f or rolled-in rate treatm ent. SCE suggests that this new policy \nshould apply where it is consistent w ith a state' s requirem ent to procure \nenergy from renewable resources an d where the state has determ ined, \nthrough its state regulatory authority or RTO/ISO, that the upgrades are \nnecessary to meet its policy objectives.\" \n \n[para. 25] \"[T]he Segm ent 3 trunk facility will not be unduly \ndiscrim inatory becaus e the new category of facilities is n arrowly crafted to \nfurther federal and state policies th at encourage the develop ment of \nrenewable energy and to rem ove a roa dblock to the construction of needed \ntransm ission. SCE notes that othe r states hav e enacted renew able \nportfolio standards m andating goals fo r the purchase of renewable energ y \nand providing tax incentives and siting assis tance. SCE also claim s that \nthe Comm ission has recently approved exception s to its existing polic ies \nfor interm ittent ren ewable resou rces to \"increase diversity in the resource \nbase, [and] thereby im prov[e] system re liability as a whol e.\" Moreover, it \npoints to the Comm ission' s recently in itiated p roceeding in As sessing the \nState of W ind Energy in Wholesale Electricity M arkets, Dock et No. \nAD04-13-000, to assess options to refor m transmission access for \ninterm ittent renewable resources lik e wind. Addition ally, S CE asserts that \nthe Comm ission has previously held th at sim ilar exceptions are not unduly \ndiscrim inatory.\" \n \n[para. 26] \"SCE understands that th e Comm ission' s polic y is designed to \nencourage efficient sitin g of generation resources, but renewable energy \ndevelopers must locate at the site of the resource and do not have the sam e \nflexibility as other generators about location.\" \n \nWe need to discourage our allies from making these argum ents. They have no \nfooting in the Federal Power Act. We also need to discourage the PUC from attacking \nFERC for \"insensitivity to the s tates' needs,\" or \"insensitiv ity to re newable energy\" or any \nsimilar argum ent that som etimes emanates from state comm issions. FERC has no legal \nauthority -- none -- to m ake transm ission ra tepayers pay for non-network costs in the \nname of \"deference to s tates\" o r \"sup port fo r renewables.\" It is possible that those \nmaking these argum ents are viewing FERC as a political body that re sponds to interest \ngroups. I cannot m ake the following stat ement more clear: Although FE RC is not \npolitica lly deaf, it is f undamentally a prof ession al oper ation that a ims to cente r its \ndecis ions on legal p rinciples firs t. If we cannot argue network benefits, we will not have \nsupporting legal principles. No am ount of interest pressure or appeals to \n \n CalWEA Appendix 2 – p. 9 renewable s-consciousne ss will f ix that prob lem. Of that f act, the FERC decis ion is a mple \nevidence. \n \nb) Other possibilit ies \n \nI am omitting, for purposes of this mem orandum , the followin g other po tential \nsolutions, which require more thought: \n \ni) Ask the PUC for a ruling th at the Section 399.25(b)(4) backstop \napplie s to Se gment 3. \n \n2. Ask the Legislature to modify Section 399.25. Such a m odifi cation \ncould be broad (e.g., all facilities defined as \"renewable trunk lines\"), \nor narrow (S egment 3 only). \n \n3. Ownership by a f or-prof it entity o ther than the utility. \n \n4. California taxpayers. \n \n5. Municipal ownership. \n \n \n \n CalWEA Appendix 2 – p. 10 CalWEA Attachment to Appendix 1 – page 1 Reply to ‘Staff Response to CalWEA August 9, 2005 Letter, Attachment 1: “Significant \nCalculation Errors Found in the August 2004 PI ER Report”, Carol Pilz Weisskopf, PhD.’ 1 \n \nCarol Pilz Weisskopf, Ph.D. \nPilz & Co., LLC \n656 San Miguel Way, Sacramento, CA 95819 \n916.456.7651 \n \nMany of the critical public comments in the California Energy Commission (CEC) docket 04-IEP-1G involve \nmatters of study design, selection of appropriate correcti on factors, statistical treatment of data and the level \nof certitude placed in various mo rtality reduction hypotheses in th e Smallwood and Thelander August 2004 \nPIER report.2 These are areas subject to difference of opinion and professional judgment, and are open to \ndebate. However, the matter of carcass selection in the calculation of mortality is not debatable – it is a matter of math and of fact, of performing the calculation exactly as described, and the calculation is either correct or \nincorrect. \n Our review of golden eagle, red-tailed hawk and grea t horned owl mortality calcul ations relied on two files \nreceived from CEC staff on 07 July 2005: ‘C EC data_fatalities. sav’ dated 03/23/05 and ‘CEC data_search \ndates.xls’ also dated 03/23/05. The pert inent sections of the fatalities file are included in Attachment 2 and \nthose from the search dates in Attachment 3. The first part of the staff response claims ‘Weisskopf sw itched the number of golden eagle carcasses given an \nEstimated Time since Death of greater than 90 days (15 in Smallwood and Thelander, 6 by Weisskopf’s \nanalysis) with the number categorized as not having ETDs (6 in Smallwood and Thelander, 15 in Weisskopf \nanalysis).\n3 \n \nFirst, the Smallwood and Thelander ( 2004) report gives neither the number of Set 2 carcasses with an ETD \ngreater than 90 days nor the number with no ETDs. Thes e must be determined from the data files. Second, \nin Attachment 2 (an accurate presentation of the data given to us by CEC staff) the carcasses given an ETD \ngreater than 90 days are shown. It is no great trick to count to 6, since one does not even have to take off \none’s shoes to do it. Third, neither of these groups of carcasses was to have been used in calculation of the \ngolden eagle mortality factor, since only those with an assigned ETD less than 90 days were to have been \nused; so the actual carcass number in either category is irrelevant to the calculation. Finally, if CEC staff \nlooked at the data to determine how many carcasses were in each category, either the transposition error is \ntheirs or the data file they gave to us is in error. The sole point of agreement between staff and us is that only \n10 golden eagle carcasses were supposed to have been us ed to calculate the Set 2 turbine’s mortality factor. \n In reference to the actual mortality factor we calculated, CEC staff response to that is ‘It was only a \ncoincidence that Weisskopf’s calculat ion using the wrong group of golden eagle carcasses nearly equaled the \nunadjusted estimate of Smallwood and Thelander ( 2004); however we cannot de termine from her comment \nhow she did this.’\n4 The staff then goes on to give a one-sentence description of the calculation of the \nunadjusted mortality factor and a one-page descriptio n and justification for the correction factors applied to \n \n1 August 31, 2005 memorandum to CEC commissioners G eesman and Boyd with the subject ‘Response to public \ncomments on the staff report titled Assessment of Avian Mortality from Collisions and Electrocutions (CEC-700-2005-015) \n(Avian White Paper) written in support of the 2005 Envir onmental Performance Report and the 2005 Integrated Energy \nPolicy Report’, unpaginated secti on, 157 – 159 of the memorandum. \n2 Smallwood K.S. and C.G. Thelander, ‘Developing Methods to Reduce Bird Mortality in the Altamont Pass Wind \nResource Area’, PIER Final Pr oject Report 500-04-052, August 2004 \n3 CEC staff memorandum, op cit. p. 157. \n4 Ibid, p. 157. CalWEA Attachment to Appendix 1 – page 2 the unadjusted mortality factor. Although we have great concern about the appropriateness of the correction \nfactors, the error we posit is in the calculat ion of the unadjusted mortality factor itself. \n \nFrom the data in the files given to us by CEC staff, mo rtality factors were calculated for the golden eagle, red-\ntailed hawk, great horned owl, burrowing owl and ferruginous hawk carcasses in the Set 2 turbines (Attachment 1) according to the calculation procedure desc ribed in the 2004 PIER report.\n5 \n \nIn Attachment 1, data in columns A, B, C and H are taken from the CEC fatality file, and columns D, I and J taken from the CEC search dates file for the turbine st ring associated with the carcass. Column E is our \ncount of the number of individual towers in the stri ng, column F is our assignment of the per-turbine MW, \nand column G is the number of towers (E) times the per-turbine MW value (F). Column K is the interval \nbetween the two searches in that string (I and J), and column L is the study duration (the search interval (K) + 90 days). Column M is the deaths/MW/year for the indi vidual eagle carcass in that string, calculated by \ndividing 1 carcass by the string MW sum (G) and by the study duration (L). Column N is the sum of the \nindividual string factors (M), and in column O the string factor sum (N) is divided by the number of turbine \nstrings in Set 2 (280 strings) to give the unadjusted mo rtality factor (in deaths pe r MW per year) for the Set 2 \nturbines. Column P gives the unadju sted mortality factor as shown in Table 3-9 of the 2004 PIER report.\n6 \n \nFor the golden eagles, the first pair of numbers in co lums N and O yields the un adjusted mortality factor \nproduced if only the 10 carcasses with an ETD le ss than 90 days are used. This factor is 34.8% of the factor \ngiven in the 2004 PIER report. The second pair yields the mortality factor if th e 10 carcasses with an ETD \nless than 90 days and the 15 carcasses with no ETD are used. The second pair gives a mortality factor that is \n1.4% higher than that shown in the report. The same ho lds true for red-tailed hawk carcasses – our calculated \nunadjusted mortality factor only closely matches that reported when all carcasses with no assigned ETD are \nused along with those with an ETD less than 90 days. \nThe burrowing owl and ferruginous hawk calculations shown in Attachment 1 were performed as a check on \nour calculation procedure, as none of those carcasses had an unassigned ETD. The factor we calculated for burrowing owls was 0.5% higher and for ferruginous hawks 1.7% lower than the factors reported. As an additional check, calculations were also performed (but not shown here) for one cowbird, one mallard, one \nraven and two bluebird carcasses from the Set 2 turbines , with our calculated factors matching those reported \n± 2%. The differences in our calculated factors compared to those reported are probably due to rounding or \nsome other minor factor, but serve to demonstrate the calculation was duplicated appropriately. \n \nThe only uncertainties in our calculation of the golden eagle unadjusted mortality factor was the individual \nturbine’s MW rating and the study duration used by the authors for the golden eagle carcass found \nincidentally on 13-May-03 (Attachment 1) since it was found two months after searches of that string ceased. \nTo produce a calculated golden eagl e unadjusted mortality fa ctor that matches that given in the 2004 PIER \nreport using only the 10 ca rcasses with an assigned ETD less than 90 days, all the turbines need to average \n0.035 MW and there are none in the Al tamont that small. Th e authors did not addre ss adjustment of study \ndurations for incidental finds, so the original search dates appear in Attachment 1. However, the increase in \nthat string’s study duration to include the date the carcass was found produces a better match with the \nmortality factor in the 2004 PIER repor t, with ours higher by only 0.9% when the 10 eagle carcasses with an \nETD less than 90 days and the 15 with no assigned ETD are all included. \n \nThere have been many estimates of Altamont golden eagle mortality (Howell and DiDonato 1991, Kerlinger \nand Curry 2003, Orloff and Flannery 1992 and 1996, Smallwood and Thelander in press)7. In addition, the \n \n5 Smallwood and Thelander (2004), op cit. p. 49. \n6 Ibid, p 70. \n7 Howell J.A and J.E. DiDonato, ‘Assessment of avian use an d mortality related to wind turbine operations, Altamont \nPass, Alameda and Contra Costa Counti es, California, September 1998 – August 1989’, report to US Windpower, 1991; CalWEA Attachment to Appendix 1 – page 3 2004 PIER report golden eagle mortality factors from the Set 1 turbines c an be extrapolated to the entire \nAPWRA, omitting the Set 2 turbine factor disputed here. All of these mortality estimates, including \nSmallwood and Thelander (in press) lie between 28 and 43 golden eagle deaths per year, substantially different \nthan the 2004 PIER report’s 76 – 116 eagle deaths per year.8 \n In the PIER report, the authors address differences in mortality estimates between that report and their \nNREL report (in press). They state ‘Our new mortalit y estimates are much larger than those reported in \nSmallwood and Thelander (in review), but our report to the National Renewable Energy Lab did not include data collected over most of the APWRA where we had not yet been granted access, and it did not include \ndata from the wind turbines because we had not yet completed a full year of fatality searches on these \nturbines and decided to exclude them from our estima tes of mortality. In fact, we had noticed that the \nmortality estimates representing the SeaWest-owned turb ines were much larger than observed elsewhere, but \nwe guessed that these larger estimates might be due to time spans consisting of less than a year because the \ndenominator in the mortality estimate would be a fraction and would therefore artificially inflate the mortality \nestimate, as described in Chapter 3. However, continue d searches at these wind turbines proved that the \ngreater mortality previously observed (and excluded from our report) was no t the result of insufficient time \nspanning the searches. Mortality at the SeaWest-owned portion of the APWRA substantially exceeds mortality observed over most of the rest of the APWRA’.\n9 \n \nIn the NREL report, annual golden eagle mortality Altamont-wide is 28 and 34 deaths/year for the search \nefficiency-corrected total and the searcher efficiency plus scavenging-corrected total, respectively. The \nSeaWest-owned turbines discussed, above, are in the Set 1 turbines. When the PIER report Set 1 turbines \nalone are used to calculate annual golden eagle mortality Altamont-wide, the total is also 28 and 34 \ndeaths/year for the searcher efficien cy-corrected total and the searcher efficiency and scavenging-corrected \ntotal, respectively. The SeaWest-owned turbines do not account for the substantial difference in golden eagle \nmortality estimates between the Smallwood and Thelander NREL report and the Smallwood and Thelander \nPIER report. \n There is no evidence that CEC staff attempted to perform the same calculation exercise we demonstrate here \n– an effort to determine the source of the unexpected magnitude in the annual golden eagle mortality – \ndespite the improbability of the numbers and our effo rt to point out the sour ce of the discrepancy. \n That our calculated golden eagle and red-tailed hawk mortality factors match by ‘coincidence’ only when we include carcasses without ETDs in the data files given to us by CEC staff beggars the imagination. If this is the \nlevel of critical thought CEC staff has given to an issue as crucial as this mistake in calculation, we have little \nreason to expect competent assessment of any other public criticism in the remainder of the staff response. \n \nKerlinger P. and R. Curry, ‘The relationship of golden eagle ( Aquila chrysaetos ) and red-tailed hawk ( Buteo jamaicensis ) \ncollision fatalities in the Altamont Pass wind resource area of Ca lifornia to ground squirrel management practices: 1989 \n– 2002’, report to Altamont In frastructure Company, 2003; Or loff S. and A. Flannery, ‘Wind turbine effects on avian \nactivity, habitat use, and mortality in Altamont Pass and So lano County wind resource ar eas’, CEC report, 1992; Orloff \nS. and A. Flannery, ‘A continued examination of avian mort ality in the Altamont Pass wind resource area’, CEC report \n1996; Smallwood K.S. and C.G. Thelander, ‘Bird mortality in the Altamont Pass wind resource area’, NREL report \nNREL/SR-500-36973, in press. \n8Smallwood and Thelander, op cit., p. 73. \n9 Ibid, p.76. Attachment1\nAB C D E F G H I J K L M N O P\nString MW per String Carcass Study Study Duration Duration d/MW/year d/MW/year d/MW/year d/MW/year\nETD ID Tower ID Towers in string # Towers turbine MW Date Start End (years) + 90 d for the string sum for set 2 calculated factor reported fac tor\nGolden eagle\n5 361 4542 4536-4557 22 0.1 2.2 13-May-03 18-Nov-02 10-Mar-03 0.307 0.553 0.8213 13.569 0.0485 0.13917 335 41 36-63, 1561 29 0.1 2.9 4-Mar-03 12-Nov-02 5-Mar-03 0.310 0.556 0.6200 39.495 0.1411 0.1391\n14 319 2910 2909-2915, 2954-2957 11 0.1 1.1 5-Mar-03 29-Oct-02 4-Feb-03 0.268 0.515 1.765018 408 697 686-697, 1379-1380 14 0.1 1.4 17-Mar-03 16-Oct-02 29-Jan-03 0.288 0.534 1.337021 340 104 97-110 14 0.1 1.4 3-Mar-03 14-Nov-02 4-Mar-03 0.301 0.548 1.303624 312 2965 2871-2908, 2958-2972 53 0.1 5.3 27-Oct-02 28-Oct-02 4-Feb-03 0.271 0.518 0.364433 363 964 954-964 11 0.1 1.1 14-Oct-02 15-Oct-02 28-Jan-03 0.288 0.534 1.701645 328 4323 4314, 4322-4324 4 0.1 0.4 10-Mar-03 19-Nov-02 11-Mar-03 0.307 0.553 4.517360 331 4418 4330-4349, 4410-4424 35 0.1 3.5 19-Nov-02 20-Nov-02 11-Mar-03 0.304 0.551 0.518875 335 43 36-63, 1561 29 0.1 2.9 4-Mar-03 12-Nov-02 5-Mar-03 0.310 0.556 0.620090 244 H04 H01-H04 4 0.065 0.26 26-Feb-03 11-Nov-02 27-Feb-03 0.296 0.54290 329 4325 4325-4329 5 0.1 0.5 18-Nov-02 19-Nov-02 11-Mar-03 0.307 0.553\n120 335 40 36-63, 1561 29 0.1 2.9 11-Nov-02 12-Nov-02 5-Mar-03 0.310 0.556135 341 4035 4034-4095 62 0.1 6.2 29-Oct-02 30-Oct-02 6-Feb-03 0.271 0.518180 335 39 36-63, 1561 29 0.1 2.9 11-Nov-02 12-Nov-02 5-Mar-03 0.310 0.556315 396 1395 1390-1395 6 0.1 0.6 1-Jan-03 2-Jan-03 1-Apr-03 0.244 0.490\n213 S3003 S3001-S3010 10 0.33 3.3 20-Jan-03 21-Jan-03 10-Apr-03 0.216 0.463 0.6545213 S3009 S3001-S3010 10 0.33 3.3 20-Jan-03 21-Jan-03 10-Apr-03 0.216 0.463 0.6545251 6046 6046-6060 15 0.1 1.5 1-Dec-02 2-Dec-02 17-Mar-03 0.288 0.534 1.2479271 4677 4677-4700 24 0.1 2.4 11-Mar-03 21-Nov-02 12-Mar-03 0.304 0.551 0.7566279 2355 2347-2365 19 0.1 1.9 21-Jan-03 21-Oct-02 22-Jan-03 0.255 0.501 1.0498289 2101 2094-2121 28 0.1 2.8 29-Jan-03 23-Oct-02 30-Jan-03 0.271 0.518 0.6897306 2719 2690-2719 30 0.1 3 12-Nov-02 13-Nov-02 2-Mar-03 0.299 0.545 0.6114307 2610 2565-2612 48 0.1 4.8 2-Feb-03 23-Oct-02 3-Feb-03 0.282 0.529 0.3940333 5 1 to 32 32 0.1 3.2 5-Feb-03 29-Oct-02 6-Feb-03 0.274 0.521 0.6003343 4102 4096-4102 7 0.1 0.7 10-Feb-03 30-Oct-02 11-Feb-03 0.285 0.532 2.6878348 4384 4378-4390 13 0.1 1.3 18-Nov-02 18-Nov-02 10-Mar-03 0.307 0.553 1.3899416 1508 1505-1508 4 0.1 0.4 5-Jan-03 6-Jan-03 26-Mar-03 0.216 0.463 5.3994428 238 237-242 6 0.15 0.9 16-Feb-03 31-Oct-02 17-Feb-03 0.299 0.545 2.0380462 58 58-59 2 0.15 0.3 6-Jan-03 7-Jan-03 7-Apr-03 0.247 0.493 6.7593\n468 172 68-74, 168-174 14 0.15 2.1 7-Jan-03 13-Jan-03 8-Apr-03 0.233 0.479 0.9932\nFerruginous hawk\n7 222 D13 7 0.065 0.455 5-Nov-02 6-Nov-02 25-Feb-03 0.304 0.551 3.9910 9.578 0.0342 0.0348\n24 223 M5 5 0.065 0.325 5-Nov-02 6-Nov-02 25-Feb-03 0.304 0.551 5.5874\nBurrowing owl\n30 242 G02 G01-G02 2 0.065 0.13 26-Feb-03 11-Nov-02 27-Feb-03 0.296 0.542 14.1803 28.126 0.1005 0.100024 372 1331 1331-1334 4 0.1 0.4 14-Oct-02 15-Oct-02 28-Jan-03 0.288 0.534 4.6795\n75 240 F04 F03-F05 3 0.065 0.195 2-Mar-03 11-Nov-02 3-Mar-03 0.307 0.553 9.2663\nCalWEA Attachment to Appendix 1 - page 4 From the file: CEC data_fatalities.sav Attachment 2\nBRCNUMB DATE ETD AOU$ GROUP AGE ID TOWNAME$ TOWER STRING2 DISTANCE BEARING FINDING\n1247 14-Oct-02 24 BUOW raptor unknown 3296 1331 372 18 208 wings\n1438 26-Feb-03 30 BUOW raptor unknown 1802 G02 242 39 180 old remains1440 2-Mar-03 75 BUOW raptor unknown 1794 F04 240 37 262 wings1484 23-Mar-03 90 BUOW raptor unknown 1938 4649 263 1 old remains1278 5-Nov-02 7 FEHA raptor sub-adult 1664 D13 222 4 161 complete1279 5-Nov-02 24 FEHA raptor unknown 1672 M5 223 34 22 feathers1501 13-May-03 5 GOEA raptor sub-adult 3153 4542 361 21.9 12 wings1444 4-Mar-03 7 GOEA raptor sub-adult 2761 41 335 22 194 complete1450 5-Mar-03 14 GOEA raptor unknown 2595 2910 319 19 108 complete1474 17-Mar-03 18 GOEA raptor sub-adult 3647 697 408 12 258 complete1443 3-Mar-03 21 GOEA raptor unknown 2850 104 340 1 old remains1258 27-Oct-02 24 GOEA raptor adult 2546 2965 312 44 216 complete1244 14-Oct-02 33 GOEA raptor unknown 3192 964 363 16 228 prtl carcass1459 10-Mar-03 45 GOEA raptor sub-adult 2670 4323 328 50 222 complete1303 19-Nov-02 60 GOEA raptor unknown 2711 4418 331 15 196 prtl carcass1445 4-Mar-03 75 GOEA raptor unknown 2763 43 335 27 82 old remains1439 26-Feb-03 90 GOEA raptor adult 1806 H04 244 37 196 complete1301 18-Nov-02 90 GOEA raptor unknown 2672 4325 329 28 206 wings1282 11-Nov-02 120 GOEA raptor unknown 2760 40 335 41 197 complete1266 29-Oct-02 135 GOEA raptor unknown 2858 4035 341 50 168 complete1283 11-Nov-02 180 GOEA raptor unknown 2579 39 335 42 192 prtl carcass1347 1-Jan-03 315 GOEA raptor unknown 3517 1395 396 40 286 prtl carcass1380 20-Jan-03 GOEA raptor unknown 1604 S3003 213 26 170 prtl carcass1382 20-Jan-03 GOEA raptor unknown 1607 S3009 213 49 188 prtl carcass1316 1-Dec-02 GOEA raptor unknown 1857 6046 251 31 132 prtl carcass1465 11-Mar-03 GOEA raptor unknown 1992 4677 271 0 old remains1387 21-Jan-03 GOEA raptor unknown 2075 2355 279 50 192 wings1400 29-Jan-03 GOEA raptor unknown 2218 2101 289 75 219 old remains1288 12-Nov-02 GOEA raptor unknown 2399 2719 306 24 250 feathers1401 2-Feb-03 GOEA raptor unknown 2445 2610 307 16 158 old remains1409 5-Feb-03 GOEA raptor unknown 2730 5 333 3 268 prtl carcass1426 10-Feb-03 GOEA raptor unknown 2957 4102 343 30 306 old remains1300 18-Nov-02 GOEA raptor unknown 3042 4384 348 10 344 prtl carcass1350 5-Jan-03 GOEA raptor unknown 3701 1508 416 20 184 prtl carcass1431 16-Feb-03 GOEA raptor unknown 3762 238 428 49 46 old remains1352 6-Jan-03 GOEA raptor unknown 3950 58 462 27 173 old remains1356 7-Jan-03 GOEA raptor unknown 4013 172 468 35 98 old remains\nCalWEA Attachment to Appendix 1 - page 5 From the file: CEC data_fatalities.sav Attachment 2\nBRCNUMB DATE ETD AOU$\n1247 14-Oct-02 24 BUOW\n1438 26-Feb-03 30 BUOW1440 2-Mar-03 75 BUOW1484 23-Mar-03 90 BUOW1278 5-Nov-02 7 FEHA1279 5-Nov-02 24 FEHA1501 13-May-03 5 GOEA1444 4-Mar-03 7 GOEA1450 5-Mar-03 14 GOEA1474 17-Mar-03 18 GOEA1443 3-Mar-03 21 GOEA1258 27-Oct-02 24 GOEA1244 14-Oct-02 33 GOEA1459 10-Mar-03 45 GOEA1303 19-Nov-02 60 GOEA1445 4-Mar-03 75 GOEA1439 26-Feb-03 90 GOEA1301 18-Nov-02 90 GOEA1282 11-Nov-02 120 GOEA1266 29-Oct-02 135 GOEA1283 11-Nov-02 180 GOEA1347 1-Jan-03 315 GOEA1380 20-Jan-03 GOEA1382 20-Jan-03 GOEA1316 1-Dec-02 GOEA1465 11-Mar-03 GOEA1387 21-Jan-03 GOEA1400 29-Jan-03 GOEA1288 12-Nov-02 GOEA1401 2-Feb-03 GOEA1409 5-Feb-03 GOEA1426 10-Feb-03 GOEA1300 18-Nov-02 GOEA1350 5-Jan-03 GOEA1431 16-Feb-03 GOEA1352 6-Jan-03 GOEA1356 7-Jan-03 GOEACAUSE REPORT SEX$ INJURY COMMENT$\ncollision 1 Unknown Unknown injuries. Carcass missing.\ncollision 1 Unknown sevrd wing Broken piece of ulna and radius attached to remaining Rt wincollision 1 Unknown Unknown injuries. Carcass missing.collision 1 Unknown Unknown injuries. Only one leg found.collision 1 Unknown torso in half Blade cut through spine below ribcage, cutting raptor into 2collision 1 Unknown Unknown injuries. Carcass missing.collision incidental Unknown sevrd wingcollision 1 Unknown torso cut/twist Wound in upper torso from mid back to right side of abdomen.collision incidental Unknown dismembered Severed right leg and tail. Right Wing broken. Left leg likecollision 1 Unknown sevrd wing Left wing severed at top of humerus bone. Tail chopped off bcollision 1 Unknown Unknown injuries. Only bones and tissues from one leg found.collision 1 Unknown torso cut/twist Partial Right Wing severed.collision 1 Unknown torso in half Head and upper torso found 9/16/02 by Tara near turbine #960collision 1 Unknown none apparent Unknown injuries.Bird dragged by scavenger 83m. Head tuckecollision 1 Unknown torso in half Only lower torso and tail present. Spine and ribcage exposecollision 1 Unknown Unknown injuries. Part of carcass missing.\nunknown 1 Unknown none apparent Lying on Belly. 'No obvious injuries. Rubber on end of trans\ncollision 1 Unknown sevrd wing Unknown injuries. Only Partial Right Wing. Break at humeruscollision 1 Unknown sevrd wing Possible severed wing but carcass old.collision 1 Unknown Unknown injuries. Too old.collision 1 Unknown torso in half Possible torso separation into two parts found but carcass ocollision 1 Unknown Unknown injuries. Too old. Head and bones of one wing missincollision 1 Unknown Unknown injuries. Too old.collision 1 Unknown Unknown injuries. Too old.collision 1 Unknown Unknown injuries. Too old.collision 1 Unknown Unknown injuries. Only found broken Ulna bone.collision 1 Unknown Unknown injuries. Most of carcass missing. Old.\nunknown 1 Unknown Unknown injuries.Too old.\ncollision 1 Unknown Unknown injuries. Most of carcass missing. Old. collision 1 Unknown Unknown injuries. Most of carcass missing.collision 1 Unknown Unknown injuries. Carcass missing.collision 1 Unknown Unknown injuries. Too old.collision 1 Unknown Unknown injuries. Carcass too old.collision 1 Unknown Unknown injuries. Too old. Head and bones of one wing missincollision 1 Unknown Unknown injuries. Only partial pelvis and spine found.collision 1 Unknown Unknown injuries. Only found broken bones of one wing.collision 1 Unknown Unknown Injuries. Only leg bones found.\nCalWEA Attachment to Appendix 1 - page 6 From the file: CEC data_fatalities.sav Attachment 2\nBRCNUMB DATE ETD AOU$\n1247 14-Oct-02 24 BUOW\n1438 26-Feb-03 30 BUOW1440 2-Mar-03 75 BUOW1484 23-Mar-03 90 BUOW1278 5-Nov-02 7 FEHA1279 5-Nov-02 24 FEHA1501 13-May-03 5 GOEA1444 4-Mar-03 7 GOEA1450 5-Mar-03 14 GOEA1474 17-Mar-03 18 GOEA1443 3-Mar-03 21 GOEA1258 27-Oct-02 24 GOEA1244 14-Oct-02 33 GOEA1459 10-Mar-03 45 GOEA1303 19-Nov-02 60 GOEA1445 4-Mar-03 75 GOEA1439 26-Feb-03 90 GOEA1301 18-Nov-02 90 GOEA1282 11-Nov-02 120 GOEA1266 29-Oct-02 135 GOEA1283 11-Nov-02 180 GOEA1347 1-Jan-03 315 GOEA1380 20-Jan-03 GOEA1382 20-Jan-03 GOEA1316 1-Dec-02 GOEA1465 11-Mar-03 GOEA1387 21-Jan-03 GOEA1400 29-Jan-03 GOEA1288 12-Nov-02 GOEA1401 2-Feb-03 GOEA1409 5-Feb-03 GOEA1426 10-Feb-03 GOEA1300 18-Nov-02 GOEA1350 5-Jan-03 GOEA1431 16-Feb-03 GOEA1352 6-Jan-03 GOEA1356 7-Jan-03 GOEACOMMENT2$ REPEAT SCAVENGE INSECTS\nextensive\nLeft wingfound 6m away from Right Wing. extensive\nextensiveextensive\nFlies presenton lower half. Light morph. arth. only someLight morph. Fox skull and spine bones nearby but seem of extensive\nBird laying on its side with right wing meeting left.Newly arth. only some\nThink tail and right leg moved by scavenger to 2nd localne. extensive someBeetles & lots of maggots active on back& inside. 23 flags p arth. only abundent\nextensive\nRadio transmitter and Avise Bird Band (629-41132) present. arth. only someFeathers shafts broken, some chewed on. 10/15 feathers blown extensive1st feathers found at 50m from turbine.Trail of feathers l extensiveEurotrophication - flesh covered in white slime. Clean humer extensiveKeel of sternum chewed off. extensiveRadio Transmitter & Avise Bird Band 629-35736,Flies preseent. arth. only some\nextensive\nRadio transmitter and Band (629-41129). Squirrel and bones b extensiveLooks as if it \"melted\" into the grass. 50 estimate. Slope some\nsome\n2-3 inches of grass grown above bones. Feather shafts are someBones found on surface and below few inches of dirt and gras someMost bones found at or near the surface. Some bones scorched someBones partially buried and some broken. some\nextensiveextensive\nBones found on surface or below grass and 2-3 inches of dirt someWeathered bones and feather found partially submerged in dir someUlna had burn marks from fire in area. (Oct-02 Burn zone had extensiveBroken talon found on surface. extensiveSome small mammal bones found with GOEA bones. 20 degree slo someMost bones buried and broken. some noneSmall mammal bones found in same area - last meal? Most bone some\nextensiveextensiveextensive\nCalWEA Attachment to Appendix 1 - page 7 From the file: CEC data_search dates.xls Attachment 3\nString2 Turbine # Fall 2002 Winter 2003 Spring 2003\n213 S3001-S3010 1/21/2003 4/10/2003\n222 D7-D13 11/6/2002 2/25/2003223 M1-M5 (M3 - M13) 11/6/2002 2/25/2003224 A3001-A3004 11/4/2002 2/25/2003240 F03-F05 11/11/2002 3/3/2003242 G01-G02 11/11/2002 2/27/2003244 H01-H04 11/11/2002 2/27/2003251 6046-6060 12/2/2002 3/17/2003271 4677-4700 11/21/2002 3/12/2003279 2347-2365 10/21/2002 1/22/2003289 2094-2121 10/23/2002 1/30/2003306 2690-2719 11/13/2002 3/3/2003307 2565-2612 10/23/2002 2/3/2003312 2871-2908, 2958-2972 10/28/2002 2/4/2003319 2909-2915, 2954-2957 10/29/2002 2/4/2003328 4314, 4322-4324 11/19/2002 3/11/2003329 4325-4329 11/19/2002 3/11/2003331 4330-4349, 4410-4424 11/20/2002 3/11/2003333 1 to 32 10/29/2002 2/6/2003335 36-63, 1561 11/12/2002 3/5/2003340 97-110 11/14/2002 3/4/2003341 4034-4095 10/30/2002 2/6/2003343 4096-4102 10/30/2002 2/11/2003348 4378-4390 11/18/2002 3/10/2003361 4536-4557 11/18/2002 3/10/2003363 954-964 10/15/2002 1/28/2003372 1331-1334 10/15/2002 1/28/2003396 1390-1395 1/2/2003 4/1/2003408 686-697, 1379-1380 10/16/2002 1/29/2003416 1505-1508 1/6/2003 3/26/2003428 237-242 10/31/2002 2/17/2003462 58-59 1/7/2003 4/7/2003468 68-74, 168-174 1/13/2003 4/8/2003\nCalWEA Attachment to Appendix 1 - page 8"
} |
[
-0.07805293053388596,
-0.003348963800817728,
0.09297554939985275,
0.027933252975344658,
0.1112217903137207,
-0.039041124284267426,
0.00640663830563426,
0.03940420597791672,
0.022718697786331177,
0.0013668164610862732,
-0.047600749880075455,
-0.07034175097942352,
0.031861476600170135,
-0.008651677519083023,
0.028870252892374992,
0.04234592244029045,
-0.022720305249094963,
-0.01866603083908558,
-0.06023546680808067,
0.08135838061571121,
0.07934031635522842,
-0.0034898468293249607,
-0.08207295089960098,
-0.006252175197005272,
0.007505457848310471,
0.06115705892443657,
-0.01621265895664692,
-0.007795780431479216,
-0.02326229214668274,
0.11374726891517639,
-0.03153623640537262,
0.041564323008060455,
0.056832391768693924,
0.014662958681583405,
0.015328194946050644,
-0.03532542660832405,
-0.004382784478366375,
0.026984238997101784,
-0.08263982087373734,
0.061344604939222336,
-0.060229286551475525,
0.05664918199181557,
0.03221062198281288,
0.03440205380320549,
0.04955672472715378,
-0.03629262000322342,
0.02774878405034542,
-0.03574908524751663,
-0.004067740403115749,
0.06420391798019409,
-0.03848833590745926,
0.013115383684635162,
-0.07876311242580414,
0.01820663921535015,
-0.04670904204249382,
0.041365671902894974,
-0.07757159322500229,
-0.04809007793664932,
-0.027146873995661736,
-0.0012120155151933432,
-0.04563866928219795,
-0.0013985325349494815,
-0.0020410320721566677,
-0.047834090888500214,
0.10486634075641632,
0.028909172862768173,
-0.019488269463181496,
0.04951685294508934,
0.03777461126446724,
-0.030333776026964188,
0.07850883156061172,
0.04517914727330208,
-0.08805567026138306,
0.06115086376667023,
-0.03301199525594711,
-0.040483780205249786,
-0.0609939843416214,
-0.08405886590480804,
-0.0057778325863182545,
-0.009529614821076393,
0.04999426752328873,
0.002531147561967373,
0.035915762186050415,
-0.01646178588271141,
-0.06280428171157837,
0.04070277884602547,
0.08117625117301941,
-0.0425138957798481,
-0.021093260496854782,
-0.014539800584316254,
-0.014051493257284164,
-0.06464237719774246,
0.038863856345415115,
-0.0720277950167656,
0.04032816365361214,
0.09919478744268417,
-0.04091057926416397,
0.03798498585820198,
-0.005397787783294916,
-0.01018755603581667,
0.03832946717739105,
-0.00574200926348567,
-0.06929820775985718,
-0.045317236334085464,
0.019419396296143532,
0.007715716026723385,
0.12099237740039825,
-0.05128864571452141,
-0.005694777239114046,
0.09993545711040497,
0.0030655143782496452,
-0.030992725864052773,
-0.0986991599202156,
-0.008530914783477783,
0.0739634707570076,
0.031051015481352806,
0.02079007960855961,
-0.010590868070721626,
-0.0714464783668518,
-0.06597307324409485,
-0.03671634569764137,
0.057101137936115265,
-0.011015491560101509,
0.0787595883011818,
0.1363830864429474,
0.0507260337471962,
-0.039582666009664536,
1.6307780065751447e-33,
0.05004312843084335,
-0.011017982847988605,
-0.01642194390296936,
-0.010484767146408558,
-0.05797610804438591,
-0.056915268301963806,
0.0468897819519043,
-0.02163875661790371,
-0.05092465505003929,
0.055075012147426605,
-0.13199885189533234,
0.028764287009835243,
-0.043148595839738846,
-0.029001334682106972,
-0.0011651308741420507,
-0.04586055129766464,
0.024661105126142502,
-0.08084586262702942,
0.01322148460894823,
0.044875241816043854,
-0.039709948003292084,
-0.0054618194699287415,
0.042131345719099045,
-0.028916239738464355,
-0.05090202018618584,
-0.04724165424704552,
-0.0061232238076627254,
-0.023136882111430168,
0.06963734328746796,
-0.002362479455769062,
0.04537880793213844,
-0.02607072703540325,
-0.07805877178907394,
0.08335842192173004,
0.04704257845878601,
-0.0006759679527021945,
-0.03464512154459953,
0.02217036299407482,
0.03352092206478119,
0.018240272998809814,
-0.03960234299302101,
-0.008092395961284637,
-0.043323855847120285,
-0.026027025654911995,
-0.0188465416431427,
-0.05309952422976494,
-0.030521852895617485,
-0.026653246954083443,
0.08381589502096176,
-0.005198510829359293,
-0.0407344289124012,
0.08966179937124252,
0.023209843784570694,
0.026214834302663803,
-0.0011055318173021078,
0.03715863823890686,
0.12495724111795425,
-0.035304173827171326,
-0.006410108879208565,
0.04358290135860443,
-0.09331756830215454,
0.004018477629870176,
0.057980749756097794,
0.040404386818408966,
0.09731338173151016,
0.11439018696546555,
-0.00468597374856472,
0.07708560675382614,
-0.0026846362743526697,
-0.03680310770869255,
0.020194146782159805,
-0.058810215443372726,
0.0023067158181220293,
0.03480594977736473,
-0.02157915011048317,
0.04481907933950424,
-0.00869277585297823,
0.041631974279880524,
-0.02949790097773075,
0.0368419848382473,
-0.0544540211558342,
-0.030162177979946136,
0.0330449603497982,
0.022379489615559578,
-0.19497008621692657,
0.00047038745833560824,
0.07983322441577911,
-0.02208871580660343,
0.031563930213451385,
0.0037928021047264338,
0.015411637723445892,
-0.016833804547786713,
0.07018368691205978,
-0.05671793222427368,
-0.11032672226428986,
-3.478609208319702e-33,
0.03288047015666962,
0.0032149783801287413,
-0.08762604743242264,
-0.025329994037747383,
-0.013649644330143929,
0.05065789446234703,
0.023714106529951096,
-0.02129899337887764,
-0.007779248990118504,
0.007103809155523777,
-0.0005193108809180558,
-0.007366863079369068,
0.027298254892230034,
-0.037884168326854706,
0.08175462484359741,
0.017866941168904305,
-0.0035499371588230133,
0.10410364717245102,
-0.01914449781179428,
-0.07706882059574127,
-0.005025586113333702,
-0.03730176389217377,
0.036135002970695496,
0.02258838713169098,
0.010230520740151405,
-0.030080551281571388,
0.1566057950258255,
0.009495730511844158,
0.006959168706089258,
-0.047628890722990036,
-0.0286966934800148,
0.07948670536279678,
0.062496647238731384,
-0.03136799484491348,
-0.0210128091275692,
-0.005960947368294001,
0.06136208772659302,
-0.03903229534626007,
-0.09656350314617157,
-0.0968528687953949,
-0.03573950380086899,
-0.05768812447786331,
0.12140458822250366,
-0.007672586478292942,
0.055720992386341095,
-0.015332861803472042,
0.012371445074677467,
-0.006303462665528059,
0.06254298985004425,
-0.06637617200613022,
-0.002469941508024931,
-0.05156584456562996,
0.006505103316158056,
0.04064570739865303,
0.025530677288770676,
0.041193004697561264,
-0.003750319592654705,
0.06617212295532227,
-0.0011263800552114844,
-0.1017872765660286,
0.006836749613285065,
-0.11296989023685455,
-0.022517232224345207,
-0.11014530807733536,
0.007530138362199068,
-0.08780749142169952,
0.010315202176570892,
-0.047037865966558456,
-0.08645413815975189,
-0.014338253065943718,
-0.02381749078631401,
-0.017923248931765556,
0.10715760290622711,
-0.024061882868409157,
-0.07363532483577728,
-0.04720141738653183,
0.025754490867257118,
0.01156715676188469,
0.010625672526657581,
0.021356115117669106,
-0.029998721554875374,
0.015351902693510056,
-0.05007575452327728,
-0.03347878158092499,
0.011391336098313332,
-0.009607662446796894,
0.0457574836909771,
-0.0343453548848629,
-0.07084839791059494,
0.013910796493291855,
-0.010470845736563206,
-0.011249789968132973,
-0.04112183675169945,
0.006399133708328009,
-0.0019817091524600983,
-4.9606153851300405e-8,
0.10527271032333374,
0.012744593434035778,
0.029298163950443268,
0.059854451566934586,
-0.0011535824742168188,
0.04288234934210777,
-0.04390476271510124,
0.017497945576906204,
-0.004050887655466795,
-0.006778329610824585,
0.03306503966450691,
0.03469454497098923,
0.031193479895591736,
-0.05399589613080025,
-0.0024877029936760664,
-0.08242003619670868,
0.012003520503640175,
-0.029909469187259674,
-0.010771108791232109,
-0.06060924381017685,
0.021196143701672554,
-0.004743080120533705,
-0.10971346497535706,
-0.03460703045129776,
-0.017810968682169914,
0.03295034170150757,
0.0436556451022625,
0.020362138748168945,
-0.012914616614580154,
-0.036588359624147415,
-0.11440278589725494,
-0.023330751806497574,
0.022883258759975433,
-0.061789870262145996,
0.0516517199575901,
-0.057609546929597855,
-0.050708986818790436,
0.06810153275728226,
0.05906708166003227,
0.023597871884703636,
-0.05206669494509697,
0.05636420473456383,
-0.02672918513417244,
0.05272664129734039,
0.03160189092159271,
0.018690435215830803,
-0.03558463230729103,
-0.012999556958675385,
0.015773164108395576,
0.04130574315786362,
0.01454427745193243,
0.013639718294143677,
0.015527158044278622,
0.04863828793168068,
0.01918110065162182,
0.11709989607334137,
-0.1006287932395935,
-0.044585373252630234,
-0.0776585191488266,
0.07055416703224182,
0.03350573033094406,
0.002690609311684966,
-0.09587884694337845,
0.05274096131324768
] | {
"pdf_file": "P75PT46UN56V2ZSIQXVOXK4ILE4ZLOSZ.pdf",
"text": "Multiyear study of the dependence of sea salt aerosol\non wind speed and sea ice conditions\nin the coastal Arctic\nN. W. May1, P. K. Quinn2, S. M. McNamara1, and K. A. Pratt1,3\n1Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA,2Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory,\nNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, USA,3Department of Earth and Environmental\nSciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA\nAbstract Thinning of Arctic sea ice gives rise to ice fracturing and leads (areas of open water surrounded\nby sea ice) that are a potential source of sea salt aerosol. Atmospheric particle inorganic ion concentrations,local sea ice conditions, and meteorology at Barrow, AK, from 2006 to 2009, were combined to investigate\nthe dependence of submicron (aerodynamic diameter <1μm) and supermicron (aerodynamic diameter\n1–10μm) sea salt mass concentrations on sea ice coverage and wind speed. Consistent with a wind-dependent\nsource, supermicron sea salt mass concentrations increased in the presence of nearby leads and wind speeds\ngreater than 4 m s\n/C01. Increased supermicron and submicron sea salt chloride depletion was observed for\nperiods of low winds or a lack of nearby open water, consistent with transported sea salt in fluence. Sea salt\naerosol produced from leads has the potential to alter cloud formation, as well as the chemical composition\nof the Arctic atmosphere and snowpack.\n1. Introduction\nRapid sea ice loss is dramatically changing the Arctic surface [ Serreze and Stroeve , 2015]. Mean\nSeptember coverage of Arctic sea ice decreased by /C013.3% decade/C01for the period of 1979 –2014\n[Serreze and Stroeve , 2015], and complete summertime loss of sea ice is expected within 50 years\n[Overland and Wang , 2013]. In the winter-spring, the Arctic is becoming increasingly dominated by\nfirst-year sea ice cover [ Maslanik et al ., 2011]. Thinner first-year sea ice is less structurally stable and more\nprone to fracturing, likely resulting in the formation of leads (transient areas of open water surroundedby sea ice), as well as more pancake ice [ Stroeve et al ., 2012]. Increasing sea salt aerosol production is\nexpected from the newly exposed ocean surface [ Browse et al ., 2014; Struthers et al ., 2011]. Sea ice loss\nis also expected to increase the emissions of marine primary organic aerosol and dimethyl sul fide, as well as\nlead to changes in aerosol processing and removal in the Arctic boundary layer through changing\nmeteorology [ Browse et al ., 2014].\nAtmospheric aerosols represent the largest source of uncertainty in global radiative forcing predictions\n[Boucher et al ., 2013]. An increase in sea salt aerosol emissions will increase Arctic aerosol optical depth,\nincreasing the magnitude of aerosol direct radiative forcing (cooling) [ Struthers et al ., 2011]. Sea salt aerosols\ncan also indirectly alter radiative forcing by acting as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) [ Wise et al ., 2009].\nSimulations by Browse et al . [2014] suggested that the CCN response to increased sea salt aerosol from the\nArctic Ocean is weak due to ef ficient scavenging of particles and decreased new particle formation from a\ngreater condensation sink. However, the predicted CCN response was spatially nonuniform, with coastal\nArctic regions predicted to have a larger CCN response than the central Arctic Ocean [ Browse et al ., 2014].\nFurther, deposition of sea salt aerosol to the snow surface contributes to springtime atmospheric reactive\nbromine chemistry and ozone depletion [ Pratt et al ., 2013; Simpson et al., 2005]. However, due to limited\nArctic aerosol measurements, the contributions and radiative impacts of sea salt aerosol under changingsea ice conditions are uncertain.\nUnder open ocean conditions, sea salt aerosol mass concentrations typically increase with increasing wind\nspeed [ Lewis and Schwartz , 2004] and decreasing water temperature [ Salter et al ., 2015]. Airborne sea salt\naerosol particles are formed by two distinct processes when bubbles on the seawater surface burst[Blanchard and Woodcock , 1957]. The fragmentation of the top of the bubble membrane produces film drops.\nAfter the bubble membrane top bursts, droplets of water are flung upward from the bubble bottom,\nMAY ET AL. ARCTIC SEA SALT AEROSOL 9208PUBLICATION S\nJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres\nRESEARCH ARTICLE\n10.1002/2016JD025273\nSpecial Section:\nThe Arctic: An AGU Joint\nSpecial Collection\nKey Points:\n•Local sea ice coverage and wind\nspeed are controlling factors for Arcticsea salt concentrations\n•Sea salt aerosol is produced from sea\nice leads at wind speeds >4m / s\n•The in fluence of long-range\ntransported sea salt aerosol was\ngreatest during periods of lower\nwinds and increased sea ice coverage\nSupporting Information:\n•Supporting Information S1\nCorrespondence to:\nK. A. Pratt,prattka@umich.edu\nCitation:\nMay, N. W., P. K. Quinn, S. M. McNamara,and K. A. Pratt (2016), Multiyear study of\nthe dependence of sea salt aerosol on\nwind speed and sea ice conditions inthe coastal Arctic, J. Geophys. Res.\nAtmos. ,121, 9208 –9219, doi:10.1002/\n2016JD025273.\nReceived 25 APR 2016\nAccepted 25 JUL 2016\nAccepted article online 29 JUL 2016Published online 13 AUG 2016\n©2016. American Geophysical Union.\nAll Rights Reserved. producing jet drops. Particles result from film and jet drops after evaporation, with film drops mainly resulting\nin submicron particles and jet drops generally resulting in supermicron particles [ O’Dowd et al ., 1997]. Over\nthe open ocean, the bubble-bursting production of sea salt aerosol is driven by wind-induced wave breakingthat entrains air underneath the ocean surface. However, there is still uncertainty regarding the mechanism\nof aerosol production from leads. Nilsson et al . [2001] and Leck et al . [2002] measured wind-dependent\nnumber fluxes of particles, likely produced through the bubble-bursting mechanism, from open leads at a\nrate ~10 times less than the open ocean, which was attributed to the decreased fetch over the open leads.\nHowever, Nilsson et al . [2001] found that an additional particle emission mechanism was needed to explain\nthe particle number fluxes at low wind speeds. Studies conducted under lower wind speed conditions have\nproposed emission mechanisms, including the transport of bubbles to the surface by increased turbulence\ncaused by supercooling conditions [ Grammatika and Zimmerman , 2001], gas released from melting ice\n[Leck and Bigg , 1999; Nilsson et al ., 2001], phytoplankton respiration [ Johnson and Wangersky , 1987], and a\nsurface heat flux-driven mechanism [ Norris et al ., 2011].\nSea salt aerosol is a signi ficant contributor to Arctic particle mass [ Quinn et al ., 2002]. Given the impacts of sea\nsalt aerosol on climate and the changing sea ice surface, it is imperative to evaluate the contribution of sea\nsalt aerosol produced from leads. Previous Arctic spring [ Radke et al ., 1976; Scott and Levin , 1972] and summer\n[Held et al ., 2011a; Held et al ., 2011b; Leck and Persson , 1996; Leck and Bigg , 1999; Leck and Svensson , 2015;\nLeck et al ., 2002; Nilsson et al ., 2001] short-term intensive studies measured the direct flux of particles from\nleads over the pack ice. However, signi ficant uncertainty remains regarding the extent leads currently\ninfluence Arctic particle mass concentrations over multiple seasons and at coastal locations. Therefore, to\nbuild on previous work on the production of aerosols from leads and to probe the wind dependence of\nsea salt aerosol production from Arctic leads across multiple seasons and years, we present an examinationof sea salt concentrations near Barrow, Alaska, under varying local sea ice and wind speed conditions from\nApril 2006 to December 2009.\n2. Methods\n2.1. Meteorology\nWind speed and wind direction data were available with 1 min resolution for the National Oceanic and\nAtmospheric Administration (NOAA) Barrow Observatory (71°32 ′30″N, 156°61 ′14″W) at 10 m above ground.\nGiven that wind speeds ≥4ms/C01over open ocean are typically associated with the formation of bubbles\nresponsible for sea salt aerosol production [ Monahan and O ’Muircheartaigh , 1986], wind speed data were\ndivided into three average wind speed categories: (1) “low ”<4ms/C01, (2) “moderate ”4–7ms/C01, and (3)\n“high ”>7ms/C01. As there are no direct measurements of wind speed over the adjacent Arctic Ocean avail-\nable, it is assumed that local measured wind speed is representative of the wind speed over the nearby\nsea ice and open water. The local wind speeds observed in this study are consistent with previous obser-\nvations of Arctic wind speeds over sea ice [ Tjernström et al ., 2012], with low or moderate wind speeds pre-\nsent for 22% and 62% of supermicron, respectively, and 29% and 48%, respectively, of submicron particle\nsampling periods.\n2.2. Sea Ice Radar\nThe coverage of local near-shore sea ice at Barrow, AK was determined by examination of radar backscatter\nmaps (http://seaice.alaska.edu/gi/data/barrow_radar) produced from a Furuno 10 kW, X-band marine radar,\nwhich provides high spatial resolution sea ice imaging during both light and dark periods (Figure 1). Theradar operated atop a building in downtown Barrow (71°17 ′33″N, 156°47 ′17″W) 22.5 m above sea level, with\na range of up to 11 km to the northwest [ Druckenmiller et al ., 2009; Eicken et al ., 2011]. While the radar only\ncovered sea ice conditions to the northwest in this analysis, any lead activity observed within the 11 km rangeanalyzed in this study was assumed to re flect lead activity along the coast to the southwest and northeast, as\nobserved frequently by Mahoney et al . [2014]. Radar backscatter maps were manually analyzed to divide the\nobserved local sea surface into three categories: (1) full sea ice cover present, when local sea ice cover wascomplete and no areas of exposed ocean surface were present; (2) leads present, when local sea ice cover\nwith areas of exposed ocean surface was present: and (3) open ocean, when no major local sea ice cover\nwas observed on the radar map (Figure 1).Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 10.1002/2016JD025273\nMAY ET AL. ARCTIC SEA SALT AEROSOL 9209 2.3. Aerosol Chemical Composition\nAtmospheric particles were sampled at\nthe NOAA Barrow Observatory 10 m\nabove the surface from April 2006 to\nDecember 2009. Real-time wind direc-tion was used to sample only from the\nclean air sector (0° –129°) to avoid in flu-\nence from local pollution [ Quinn et al .,\n2002]. The Beaufort and Chukchi Seas\nare 2 –25 km upwind of the aerosol sam-\npling site in the clean air sector, so all airsampled is assumed to be of direct mar-\nine origin. A Berner-type multijet cas-\ncade impactor operating at a sample\nflow rate of 30 L min\n/C01with 50% cut\npoints at aerodynamic diameters ( D50)\nof 10 μm and 1 μm was used to collect\nparticles with aerodynamic dia-\nmeters <1μm (referred to as submi-\ncron particles) and 1 –10μm (referred\nto as supermicron particles). Particles\nwith diameters <1μm passed through\nan impactor to a rotating filter carousel\nhousing eight Millipore Fluoropore fil-\nters (1.0 mm pore size). For every revolu-\ntion of the rotating submicron filter\ncarousel, seven filters were sampled\nindividually, with sampling time varying\ndepending on season and particle load-ings, and one filter, exposed to ambient\nair for 10 s, served as a blank. Particles\nwith aerodynamic diameters between1 and 10 μm were collected on Tedlar\nfilms over the course of one revolution\nof the rotating submicron filter carousel,\nwith one additional film collected as a\nblank for every supermicron sample\nFigure 1. Representative radar backscatter\nmaps of local near-shore sea surface at\nBarrow, AK. The yellow arrow indicates\ndirection of north, the aerosol samplinglocation is marked by a yellow circle, and the\nradar backscatter location is marked with a\nyellow square. Land is colored green, white isindicative of sea ice, and black is shown for\nopen water. Sea ice conditions include (a) full\nsea ice coverage, indicated by the full\ncoverage of the white signal indicative of sea\nice; (b) leads present, identi fied from the area\nof dark signal in the upper left indicative of\nopen ocean present in the middle of the\nwhite signal indicative of sea ice; and (c) open\nocean, identi fied from the full coverage of the\ndark signal indicative of open ocean.Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 10.1002/2016JD025273\nMAY ET AL. ARCTIC SEA SALT AEROSOL 9210 collected. To minimize bounce of large particles onto downstream submicron filters, a 12 mm grease cup\ncoated with silicone grease and a film coated with silicone spray were placed on the 10 μm jet [ Quinn\net al ., 2002]. Sample air was heated to maintain a stable reference relative humidity (RH) of 40% despite\nchanges in ambient RH. The stable sampling RH allows for a constant instrumental size segregation, and\nall measurements are reported at the reference RH [ Quinn et al ., 2002]. Submicron and supermicron particle\nsampling periods ranged from 1 to 11 days and 5 to 35 days, respectively. After collection, sealed filters and\nfilms were shipped to the NOAA Paci fic Marine Environmental Laboratory for analysis.\nFor inorganic ion analysis, filters and films were first wetted with 1 mL of spectral grade methanol. Five milli-\nliters of distilled deionized water was then added to the solution, and the samples were extracted by sonicat-\ning for 30 min. Concentrations of major cations (Na+,N H 4+,K+,M g2+, and Ca2+) and anions (CH 3SO3/C0,C l/C0,\nBr/C0,N O 3/C0,S O 42/C0, and C 2O₄2/C0) extracted from each submicron and supermicron particle sample were mea-\nsured by ion chromatography [ Quinn et al ., 1998]. Details of the inlet, sampling procedures, and chemical ana-\nlyses can be found in Delene and Ogren [2002] and Quinn et al . [2002]. Based on the aerosol sampling flow rate\n(30 L min/C01) and typical sampling time, the detection limits calculated as 2 times the standard deviation of\nthe blank for the major sea salt ions of interest, Na+and Cl/C0, were both 0.0002 μgm/C03. For periods that were\nbelow the detection limit, a value of half the detection limit (0.0001 μgm/C03) was substituted for calculations.\nPeriods below the detection limit constituted 0% of supermicron and 12% submicron sampling periods for\nNa+and 3% of supermicron and 20% submicron sampling periods for Cl/C0.N a+mass concentration is a con-\nservative tracer for sea salt mass [ Legrand et al ., 2016] and will be discussed henceforth in the place of sea salt\nmass to avoid biases from varying chloride depletion. While sea spray aerosol is a complex mixture of inor-\nganic salts and organic compounds, the distribution of which alters the chemical and physical properties\nof the particle, sea spray aerosol is primarily ( >60%) composed of inorganic salt [ Quinn et al ., 2015]. All Na+\nis assumed to be derived from seawater [ Quinn et al ., 2002], as Sirois and Barrie [1999] showed that the major-\nity of Na+in the Arctic is associated with sea salt aerosol. Error was calculated as the standard error of the\nmean and is not shown for periods when only one sampling period fell into the given sea surface and wind\nspeed category.\n3. Results and Discussion\n3.1. Sea Salt Mass Concentrations\nA clear dependence of supermicron (1 –10μm) Na+(sea salt) mass concentrations on the combination of local\nsea ice coverage and wind speed was observed (Figure 2a). There was little difference in the supermicron Na+\nmass concentrations observed for periods with no leads present and low ( <4ms/C01) (0.04 ± 0.01 μgm/C03)o r\nmoderate (4 –7ms/C01) (0.03 μgm/C03) wind speeds compared to periods with leads and low wind speeds\n(0.026 ± 0.009 μgm/C03). However, for periods characterized by moderate wind speeds, supermicron Na+mass\nconcentrations were higher when leads were present (0.11 ± 0.03 μgm/C03) compared to when full sea ice\ncover was present (0.03 μgm/C03). Unfortunately, no supermicron sampling periods of full sea ice coverage\nwith high wind speeds ( >7ms/C01) were present for comparison to periods of leads present with high\nwind speeds.\nWhen leads were present, supermicron Na+mass concentrations were 4 and 10 times greater for periods with\nmoderate (0.11 ± 0.03 μgm/C03) and high (0.3 ± 0.1 μgm/C03) wind speeds, respectively, in comparison to low\nwind speeds (0.03 ± 0.01 μgm/C03) (Figure 2a). This is consistent with wind-driven sea salt aerosol number\nfluxes from leads observed directly by Nilsson et al . [2001] and Leck et al . [2002]. Local leads, when observed\nby the sea ice radar, are the most likely source for the wind-dependent supermicron Na+mass observed in\nthis study, as the lifetime of supermicron aerosols in the boundary layer is typically <12 h [ Williams et al .,\n2002]. The short lifetime of these supermicron particles limits the distance from which the majority of theseparticles could have originated, for the wind speeds observed, to a scale of a few hundred kilometers, which\nwould fall within the area of Arctic sea ice coverage in the winter-spring and for which the sea ice radar is\nrepresentative of ice fracturing conditions [ Mahoney et al ., 2014].\nThe highest supermicron Na\n+mass concentrations are expected for open ocean and high wind speeds, as sea\nsalt aerosol production generally increases with increasing wind speed and fetch [ Lewis and Schwartz , 2004].\nWhile no supermicron particle sampling periods occurred for open ocean and low wind speeds, periods ofJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 10.1002/2016JD025273\nMAY ET AL. ARCTIC SEA SALT AEROSOL 9211 open ocean with moderate wind speeds showed supermicron Na+mass concentrations (0.5 ± 0.1 μgm/C03)\n5 times greater than for periods when leads were present with moderate winds. Previously, sea salt\naerosol number fluxes over leads were measured to be 10 times smaller than those over the open ocean\nat similar wind speeds, an observation which was attributed to the smaller fetch and area of exposed\nwater [ Leck et al ., 2002; Nilsson et al ., 2001]. Therefore, these long-term measurements show that while\na smaller source than open water, leads are a signi ficant wind-dependent source of supermicron sea salt\nparticle mass in the Arctic. The supermicron Na+mass concentration for high wind speeds (0.3 μgm/C03)\nwas slightly lower than for periods of open ocean with moderate winds (0.5 ± 0.1 μgm/C03), contrary to\nthat expected based on the dependence of sea salt aerosol mass over open ocean on wind speed\n[Lewis and Schwartz , 2004]. However, only one open ocean aerosol sampling period was characterized\nby sustained high winds, imparting uncertainty in the trend that can be attributed to the small sample\nsize and natural variability in meteorological condi tions that would impact sea salt aerosol concentra-\ntions through deposition and marine boundary layer mixing [ Lewis and Schwartz ,2 0 0 4 ] .H o w e v e r ,i ti s\nimportant to note that despite these confounding factors there are statistically signi ficant trends\noverall in the dependence of supermicron sea salt concentrations on local sea ice extent and local\nwind speed.\nFigure 2. Average mass concentrations of Na+for the (a) supermicron (1 –10μm), (b) submicron particle ( <1μm) and\n(c) total size ranges, and (d) the fraction of the total Na+mass that was observed in the supermicron size range, separated\ninto nine bins based on local sea ice extent and wind speed. Sea ice extent categories include full ice, leads present, and open\nwater. Wind speed categories include low ( <4ms/C01), mid (4 –7ms/C01), and high ( >7ms/C01). All error bars were calculated as\nthe standard error of the mean, and the numbers above each category indicate the number of samples in that category.Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 10.1002/2016JD025273\nMAY ET AL. ARCTIC SEA SALT AEROSOL 9212 There was no overall dependence of submicron ( <1μm) Na+mass concentrations on local sea ice coverage\nand wind speed (Figure 2b). Unlike supermicron Na+mass concentrations, submicron Na+mass concentra-\ntions did not increase substantially when leads were present. The average submicron Na+mass concentration\nwhen leads were present was 0.25 ± 0.03 μgm/C03, compared to 0.21 ± 0.06 μgm/C03when leads were not pre-\nsent. In further contrast to supermicron Na+mass concentrations, a wind speed dependence in submicron\nNa+mass concentration was not observed when leads were present (Figure 2b). In fact, open ocean periods\nwith low or moderate wind speeds resulted in the lowest observed submicron Na+mass concentrations\n(0.03 ± 0.02 μgm/C03and 0.11 ± 0.03 μgm/C03, respectively). The lack of correlation of submicron Na+mass\nconcentrations with local sea ice coverage and wind speed is most likely due to the longer atmospheric\nresidence time of submicron sea salt particles, compared to supermicron sea salt particles [ Gong et al .,\n2002; Williams et al ., 2002]. The shorter residence time of supermicron sea salt aerosol decreases the in fluence\nof long-range transport, which signi ficantly in fluenced the observed submicron sea salt aerosol, as discussed\nin section 3.2. The long-range transport of submicron sea salt aerosol produced from high-latitude open\nocean sources to the Arctic could therefore have a signi ficant in fluence on submicron Na+mass concentra-\ntions, as previously concluded [ Barrie and Barrie , 1990; Barrie et al ., 1994; Quinn et al ., 2002; Sirois and Barrie ,\n1999; Sturges and Barrie , 1988].\nDuring periods of full sea ice cover and open ocean, submicron Na+mass concentrations exhibited a\ncorrelation with wind speed. For full sea ice periods, submicron Na+mass concentrations increased from\nlow (0.19 ± 0.05 μgm/C03) and moderate (0.2 ± 0.1 μgm/C03) to high wind speed (0.3 μgm/C03), although the\nincrease from moderate to high wind speed was not statistically signi ficant, in part due to the availability of\nonly one sampling period at high wind speed for comparison (Figure 2b). Under full ice conditions, a non –wave\nbreaking source of Na+, as discussed in section 3.4, could potentially contribute, in addition to long-range\ntransport, as discussed in section 3.2. For open ocean periods, submicron Na+showed a greater dependence\non local meteorology. Submicron Na+mass concentrations increased from low (0.03 ± 0.01 μgm/C03) to moder-\nate (0.11 ± 0.03 μgm/C03) and high (0.2 ± 0.1 μgm/C03) wind speeds. However, the increase from moderate to\nhigh wind speeds was not statistically signi ficant. The higher sea salt concentrations under these open ocean\nconditions, along with the decrease in the fraction of aged submicron sea salt periods discussed in section 3.2,\nsuggests the in fluence of submicron sea salt production from local wind-driven wave breaking processes.\nOverall, the supermicron fraction of the total Na+mass concentration increased with decreasing sea ice cov-\nerage and, in the presence of leads, increasing wind speed (Figures 2c and 2d). Supermicron Na+mass con-\ncentrations comprised less than 20% of the total Na+mass concentrations for periods with full sea ice cover\nand with leads and low winds. In the presence of leads, the supermicron Na+mass fraction increased with\nincreasing wind speed. At moderate wind speeds the supermicron Na+mass concentration comprised\n40% of the total Na+mass concentration for periods with leads, ~4 times greater than periods with leads\nand low wind speeds. Then, for periods with leads and high wind speeds, the supermicron Na+mass fraction\nincreased to 50% of the total Na+mass concentration. Finally, the supermicron Na+mass fraction was the\nmost dominant for periods with open ocean, comprising 60 –80% of the total Na+mass concentration. The\ndependence of supermicron Na+mass fraction on local sea ice coverage and wind speed highlights that\nthe supermicron sea salt aerosol population is more directly in fluenced by local sea ice coverage and wind\nspeed than the submicron sea salt aerosol population, as expected due to the longer atmospheric residence\ntime of submicron sea salt particles [ Gong et al ., 2002; Williams et al ., 2002].\n3.2. Contributions of Aged Sea Salt Aerosol\nCl/C0/Na+molar ratios were calculated to investigate sea salt aerosol lifetime and chemical processing, a mea-\nsure of the in fluence of long-range transport. Sea salt aerosol retains the Cl/C0/Na+molar ratio of seawater\n(1.16) when introduced into the atmosphere [ Keene et al ., 1986]. This ratio is altered in the atmosphere\nthrough the displacement of chlorine through reaction with acidic gases, such as H 2SO4, or aqueous oxida-\ntion of SO 2(g)[Keene et al ., 1998]. The extent of aging is thus dependent on atmospheric residence time, as\nwell as the original particle mass and acidic precursor concentrations in the atmosphere [ Leck et al ., 2002].\nPrevious work has shown that fine sea salt aerosol (aerodynamic diameter <2.5μm) are more likely to have\ngreater chloride depletion than those of larger diameter coarse (aerodynamic diameter >2.5μm) sea salt\naerosol [ Barrie et al ., 1994; Hara et al ., 2002; Leck et al ., 2002]. In addition, previous work has shown that seaJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 10.1002/2016JD025273\nMAY ET AL. ARCTIC SEA SALT AEROSOL 9213 salt aerosols exhibit greater depletion following polar sunrise when production of sulfuric acid from the\noxidation of SO 2(g)occurs in the Arctic troposphere [ Sirois and Barrie , 1999]. Using Cl/C0/Na+molar ratios\n(Figure S1 in the supporting information), fractions of sampling periods dominated by “aged ”sea salt were\ncalculated for each sea ice and wind speed category (Figure 3). Aged sea salt was de fined as having a Cl/C0\nenrichment factor <0.75. Cl/C0enrichment factor is determined by dividing the Cl/C0/Na+ratio of the aerosol\nsample by the Cl/C0/Na+ratio of bulk seawater [ Newberg et al ., 2005]. Therefore, an enrichment factor <0.75\ncorresponds to the depletion of 25% or more of Cl/C0from sea salt aerosol and represents particles that have\nundergone signi ficant atmospheric processing. Sampling periods with a Cl/C0/Na+enrichment factor >0.75\nwere considered to consist primarily of “fresh ”sea salt produced from local sources.\nThe average fraction of aged submicron sea salt periods (0.74 ± 0.07) across all local sea ice coverage and wind\nspeed categories was higher than the fraction of aged supermicron sea salt periods (0.39 ± 0.06) (Figure 3). The\nmedian Cl/C0/Na+molar ratios for submicron and supermicron sea salt aerosol sampling periods also exhibited a\ndependence on local sea ice coverage and wind speed (Figure S2). Overall, the median Cl/C0/Na+molar ratio of\nsubmicron sea salt periods (0.62) was lower than the median Cl/C0/Na+molar ratio for supermicron sampling\nperiods (0.86) (Figure S2). This indicates that the atmospheric processing undergone by the submicron sea salt\nresulted in a greater Cl/C0depletion than the supermicron sea salt, as expected since smaller particles have a\nlonger residence time [ Williams et al ., 2002] and a higher surface area to volume ratio [ McInnes et al ., 1994].\nFigure 3. The fraction of sampling periods with a Cl/C0enrichment factor <0.75, corresponding to aged sea salt for\n(a) supermicron and (b) submicron size ranges, divided into categories based on sea ice conditions and wind speed,\nsimilar to Figure 2.Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 10.1002/2016JD025273\nMAY ET AL. ARCTIC SEA SALT AEROSOL 9214 The highest fractions (0.7 –0.8) of aged sea salt sampling periods were observed when full sea ice cover with\nlow and moderate wind speeds were present, consistent with the lack of a local sea salt source (Figure 3). The\nfractions of aged submicron and supermicron sea salt periods when leads or open ocean were present withlow wind speed were similarly high (0.6 –0.8). That some of the highest fractions of aged sea salt were\nobserved under low wind conditions across all sea ice coverage categories indicates that the sea salt\nobserved during low wind periods, regardless of sea ice coverage, experienced increased atmosphericprocessing, likely due to long-range transport.\nFor periods with leads present, the fraction of aged submicron and supermicron sea salt periods, respectively,\ndecreased from low (0.77 ± 0.06; 0.7 ± 0.2) to moderate (0.74 ± 0.05; 0.39 ± 0.09) to high wind speeds (0.64\n± 0.06; 0.1 ± 0.1), consistent with greater contributions from a wind-dependent local sea salt aerosol source(Figure 3). However, this potential decrease in the fraction of aged submicron sea salt periods with increased\nwind speed, when leads were present, was partly within error. When open ocean was present, the fraction of\naged submicron sea salt periods decreased, partly within error, with increasing wind speed (low windspeed = 0.8 ± 0.2; moderate wind speed = 0.75 ± 0.07; high wind speed = 0.3 ± 0.1), again consistent with a\nwind-dependent local sea salt aerosol source. These trends in sea salt aging are consistent with local sea salt\naerosol production increasing with decreasing local sea ice coverage and increasing wind speed. This furthersupports wind-driven sea salt aerosol production, dominated by supermicron particles, from leads.\n3.3. Difference in Particle Production From Leads Versus Open Ocean\nIn addition to differences in particle lifetime between submicron and supermicron sea salt aerosol [ Williams\net al., 2002], differences in the production mechanisms of submicron and supermicron sea salt aerosol from\nleads likely also contributed to the observed trends in aged fractions and sea salt mass fractions. Leck et al .\n[2002] and Nilsson et al . [2001] hypothesized that compared to open ocean production, film drop particle pro-\nduction from leads depends less on wind speed than jet drop particle production. As a result, the sea saltaerosol size distribution over pack ice is dominated by a larger particle diameter lognormal mode at\n~2μm, while over open ocean, a smaller particle diameter lognormal mode centered at 100 nm dominates\n[Nilsson et al ., 2001]. This is consistent with the lognormal size distribution of sea salt aerosol resulting from\nfilm and jet drops centered at ~100 –200 nm and ~1 –2μm dry diameters, respectively, measured by O’Dowd\net al. [1997]. Thus, the larger contribution of fresh supermicron sea salt, compared to submicron sea salt,\nobserved during periods with leads and moderate to high winds (Figure 3) is consistent with the hypothesisthat jet drops are the dominant production mechanism of sea salt aerosol from leads. Additionally, the\nincreased presence of smaller particles over open ocean observed by Nilsson et al . [2001] is evident in this\nstudy by the increased presence of fresh submicron sea salt during periods of open ocean and high windspeeds (Figure 3). These results therefore suggest that the differences in wind-driven production of sea salt\naerosol from leads, compared to open ocean, shift the mass distribution of sea salt aerosol in the Arctic\ntoward larger sizes when leads are present. This could impact radiative forcing and cloud processes in theArctic as CCN ef ficiency is size dependent [ Dusek et al ., 2006].\n3.4. Non –Wave Breaking Particle Sources\nSea salt aerosol production from local leads and open ocean appears to be the dominant contributor to sea\nsalt mass concentrations in this study. However, submicron sea salt mass concentrations, sampled under con-\nditions where local sea salt aerosol production are not expected (e.g., 0.21 ± 0.06 μgm\n/C03when full sea ice\ncover was present), were equal to or greater than those from other categories where local sea salt production\nare expected (e.g., 0.12 ± 0.03 μgm/C03when open ocean was present). This suggests that there were sea salt\naerosol sources even when no exposed ocean surface was present (Figure 2b). Frost flowers, highly saline ice\ncrystals grown on rapidly freezing open leads, are a potential source for wind-driven sea salt aerosol\nproduction when no open ocean is present [ Rankin et al ., 2000]. However, as discussed in the supporting\ninformation, the contribution from wind-blown frost flowers to the measured sea salt aerosol concentrations\nwas likely minor as there were no full sea ice cover sampling periods with SO 42/C0/Na+molar ratios indicative\nof frost flowers ( <0.02) (Figure S3) [ Douglas et al ., 2012]. In comparison, SO 42/C0/Na+molar ratios for fresh\nseawater and fresh sea salt aerosol are ~0.06 [ Keene et al ., 2007]. However, sulfate isotope analysis would\nbe necessary to fully determine the in fluence of frost flowers, as anthropogenic sulfates can mask the\nsulfate depleted frost flower sea salt [ Norman et al ., 1999; Seguin et al ., 2014]. High winds can also loft\nsaline snow particles, which are suggested to form aerosols by sublimation [ Lieb-Lappen and Obbard , 2015;Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 10.1002/2016JD025273\nMAY ET AL. ARCTIC SEA SALT AEROSOL 9215 Yang et al ., 2008]. The increase in submicron Na+mass concentrations from low wind speed (0.19 ± 0.05 μgm/C03),\nto moderate wind speed (0.2 ± 0.1 μgm/C03), to high wind speed (0.3 μgm/C03) for periods with full sea ice cover\nwas not also observed in the supermicron Na+mass concentrations. Therefore, additional detailed field\nmeasurements of aerosol size and chemical composition a re required to examine the potential size-dependent\nproduction of aerosols from blowing snow. However, this increase in submicron Na+mass concentration was\nwithin error. In addition, the Cl/C0/Na+ratio of blowing snow in Barrow, AK, is expected to be similar to the ocean\nwater ratio [ Jacobi et al ., 2012], such that any fresh sea salt observed during full ice periods can potentially be\nattributed to this source. Therefore, with less than 30% of the full sea ice cover submicron and supermicron\nsampling periods characterized by fresh sea salt, the contribution from blowing snow production to the observed\nNa+mass concentrations is likely minor w ith transported sea salt aerosol representing a greater contribution.\n3.5. Seasonality of Sea Salt Aerosol Production\nThe Arctic sea ice coverage undergoes seasonal changes, with growth during winter, loss during summer,\nand pack ice movement due to winds and currents [ Mahoney et al ., 2014]. In this study, particle sampling\nperiods with local full sea ice cover occurred during the months of November through June (Figure S4).\nFor these months, 11 –36% and 0 –25% of all submicron and supermicron particle sampling periods, respec-\ntively, corresponded to local full sea ice coverage. For Barrow, AK, Quinn et al . [2002] previously observed a\nwinter maximum in submicron sea salt aerosol, attributed to long-range transport from high-latitude regions\nof the Paci fic and Atlantic Oceans with seasonally high winds. This is consistent with the observations of the\nhighest fractions of aged sea salt and submicron Na+mass concentrations during sampling periods with full\nsea ice cover, suggesting that the winter sea salt aerosol population had the longest transport time from its\nsource. As expected, open ocean near Barrow was observed between July and November (Figure S4). The\nminimum fractions of aged sea salt and maximum supermicron Na+mass concentrations were observed\nduring these periods of local open ocean, suggesting the sea salt aerosol population during summer had\nthe shortest transport time from its source. The lower particle dry deposition velocity, and resulting longer\nparticle lifetime, over sea ice compared to over open ocean in the Arctic [ Nilsson and Rannik , 2001] likely also\ncontributed to the higher fraction of aged sea salt and higher submicron Na+mass concentrations during\nsampling periods with full sea ice cover compared to periods of local open ocean. Nearby leads were\nobserved to be present between October and July and were the dominant sea ice category over the entire\nstudy (Figure S3). Supermicron particle sampling periods with leads present comprised 50 –91% of the\nsupermicron particle sampling periods months of October to July. Submicron particle sampling periods withleads present comprised 64 –91%, and 5%, of submicron particle sampling periods November to July, and\nOctober, respectively. This suggests that sea salt aerosol production from leads currently impacts sea salt\naerosol mass concentrations, especially in the supermicron particle size range, in the Arctic atmospherethroughout the majority of the year.\n4. Conclusions\nThis three-year study at Barrow, AK allowed a comprehensive investigation into the in fluences of sea ice cov-\nerage and wind speed on sea salt mass concentrations in the coastal Arctic. Wind-driven production of seasalt aerosol from leads contributes signi ficantly to sea salt aerosol mass concentrations in the Arctic, but to\na lesser extent than wind-driven production of sea salt aerosol from open ocean. This is consistent with pre-\nvious short-term summertime number flux measurements of sea salt aerosol over open leads, where sea salt\naerosol emissions were ~10 times smaller than the open ocean [ Leck et al ., 2002; Nilsson et al ., 2001]. The in flu-\nence of sea salt aerosol production from open leads was most apparent in the supermicron size range, as evi-\ndenced by the strong dependence on wind speed of supermicron sea salt mass concentrations, whichincreased by a factor of 10 from periods with low wind speed to periods with high wind speeds, when leads\nwere present. The increase in supermicron Na\n+mass concentration from 0.035 ± 0.007 μgm/C03, when leads\nwere not present, to 0.12 ± 0.02 μgm/C03when leads were present, provides further evidence of the in fluence\nof sea salt aerosol production from leads. There was evidence of wind-driven submicron sea salt production\nfrom local leads, but submicron sea salt, depleted in chloride, from long-range transport comprised the\nmajority (~70%) of the submicron sea salt mass. The in fluence of long-range transport was greatest when\nlocal sea salt aerosol production would not be expected, including periods of low winds and full sea ice cover.Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 10.1002/2016JD025273\nMAY ET AL. ARCTIC SEA SALT AEROSOL 9216 This improves our knowledge of complex atmosphere-sea ice feedbacks [ Shepson et al ., 2012]. Supermicron\nsea salt aerosol production from leads could increase direct radiative forcing, as supermicron sea salt can con-\ntribute signi ficantly to scattering in the remote marine boundary layer [ Quinn et al ., 1998]. This supermicron\nsea salt aerosol could also impact indirect radiative forcing and cloud properties as giant CCN (2 –10μm),\nwhich can induce the formation of larger cloud droplets and accelerate precipitation in the presence of smal-\nler particles [ Yin et al ., 2000]. The CCN response to supermicron sea salt aerosol produced from leads may be\nreduced by the ef ficient removal of large particles in the highly scavenging nature of the Arctic atmosphere,\nparticularly in summer [ Browse et al ., 2012]. Supermicron sea salt aerosol emissions from leads would also\nincrease the atmospheric condensation sink, which is predicted to suppress particle nucleation fromdimethyl sul fide and reduce total CCN concentrations [ Browse et al ., 2014]. Increased emissions of supermi-\ncron sea salt aerosol from leads thus could play an important role in controlling the CCN response to changes\nin sea ice [ Browse et al ., 2014]. Supermicron sea salt aerosol could also alter snowpack and atmospheric\nhalogen photochemistry, and therefore atmospheric oxidation [ Simpson et al ., 2005]. The impacts of wind-\ndriven production of sea salt aerosol from leads could be particularly evident in winter and early spring when\nsea ice coverage is at its maximum and submicron sea salt mass concentrations are typically higher thansupermicron sea salt mass concentrations due to a lack of local open ocean source [ Quinn et al ., 2002].\nGiven decreasing multiyear sea ice extent and increasing ice fracturing [ Stroeve et al ., 2012], wind-driven\nproduction of supermicron sea salt aerosol from leads could therefore increase the supermicron sea saltaerosol mass fraction in the Arctic in the winter-spring, changing the annual contributions of sea salt aerosol\nto the Arctic winter and early spring [ Sirois and Barrie , 1999] may further increase the atmospheric sea salt\nmass burden [ Browse et al ., 2012]. To fully understand the in fluence of sea salt aerosol produced from leads,\nmeasurements of sea salt aerosol concentrations with higher time resolution must be combined with sea ice\ncoverage measurements that take into account a larger area. Furthermore, to understand the long-term\nimpacts of changing sea ice on the Arctic, decadal comparisons between sea ice conditions and sea saltaerosol are necessary.\nReferences\nBarrie, L. A., and M. J. Barrie (1990), Chemical components of lower tropospheric aerosols in the high arctic: Six years of observations, J. Atmos.\nChem. ,11, 211 –226.\nBarrie, L. A., R. Staebler, D. Toom, B. Georgi, G. Denhartog, S. Landsberger, and D. Wu (1994), Arctic aerosol size-segregated chemical\nobservations in relation to ozone depletion during Polar Sunrise Experiment 1992, J. Geophys. Res. ,99(D12), 25,439 –25,451, doi:10.1029/\n94JD01514.\nBlanchard, D. C., and A. H. Woodcock (1957), Bubble formation and modi fication in the sea and its meteorological signi ficance, Tellus ,9(2),\n145 –158, doi:10.1111/j.2153-3490.1957.tb01867.x.\nBoucher, O., et al. (2013), Clouds and aerosols, in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth\nAssessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , edited by T. F. Stocker et al., pp. 571 –658, Cambridge Univ. Press,\nCambridge, U. K., and New York.\nBrowse, J., K. S. Carslaw, S. R. Arnold, K. Pringle, and O. Boucher (2012), The scavenging processes controlling the seasonal cycle in Arctic\nsulphate and black carbon aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys. ,12(15), 6775 –6798, doi:10.5194/acp-12-6775-2012.\nBrowse, J., K. S. Carslaw, G. W. Mann, C. E. Birch, S. R. Arnold, and C. Leck (2014), The complex response of Arctic aerosol to sea-ice retreat,\nAtmos. Chem. Phys. ,14(14), 7543 –7557, doi:10.5194/acp-14-7543-2014.\nDelene, D. J., and J. A. Ogren (2002), Variability of aerosol optical properties at four North American surface monitoring sites, J. Atmos. Sci. ,\n59(6), 1135 –1150, doi:10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059 <1135:voaopa >2.0.co;2.\nDouglas, T. A., et al. (2012), Frost flowers growing in the Arctic ocean-atmosphere-sea ice-snow interface: 1. Chemical composition,\nJ. Geophys. Res. ,117, D00R09, doi:10.1029/2011JD016460.\nDruckenmiller, M. L., H. Eicken, M. A. Johnson, D. J. Pringle, and C. C. Williams (2009), Toward an integrated coastal sea-ice observatory:\nSystem components and a case study at Barrow, Alaska, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. ,56(2–3), 61 –72, doi:10.1016/j.coldregions.2008.12.003.\nDusek, U., et al. (2006), Size matters more than chemistry for cloud-nucleating ability of aerosol particles, Science ,312(5778), 1375 –1378,\ndoi:10.1126/science.1125261.\nEicken, H., J. Jones, R. Mv, C. Kambhamettu, F. J. Meyer, A. Mahoney, and M. L. Druckenmiller (2011), Environmental security in arctic\nice-covered seas: From strategy to tactics of hazard identi fication and emergency response, Mar. Technol. Soc. J. ,45(3), 37 –48.\nGong, S. L., L. A. Barrie, and M. Lazare (2002), Canadian Aerosol Module (CAM): A size-segregated simulation of atmospheric aerosol\nprocesses for climate and air quality models —2. Global sea-salt aerosol and its budgets, J. Geophys. Res. ,107(D24), 4779, doi:10.1029/\n2001JD002004.\nGrammatika, M., and W. B. Zimmerman (2001), Microhydrodynamics of flotation processes in the sea surface layer, Dyn. Atmos. Oceans ,\n34(2–4), 327 –348, doi:10.1016/S0377-0265(01)00073-2.\nHara, K., K. Osada, K. Matsunaga, Y. Iwasaka, T. Shibata, and K. Furuya (2002), Atmospheric inorganic chlorine and bromine species in Arctic\nboundary layer of the winter/spring, J. Geophys. Res. ,107(D18), 4361, doi:10.1029/2001JD001008.\nHeld, A., I. M. Brooks, C. Leck, and M. Tjernström (2011a), On the potential contribution of open lead particle emissions to the central Arctic\naerosol concentration, Atmos. Chem. Phys. ,11, 3093-3105, doi:10.5194/acp-11-3093-2011.\nHeld, A., D. A. Orsini, P. Vaattovaara, M. Tjernström, and C. Leck (2011b), Near-surface pro files of aerosol number concentration and\ntemperature over the Arctic Ocean, Atmos. Meas. Tech. ,4(8), 1603 –1616, doi:10.5194/amt-4-1603-2011.Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 10.1002/2016JD025273\nMAY ET AL. ARCTIC SEA SALT AEROSOL 9217Acknowledgments\nThe University of Michigan College of\nLiterature, Science, and the Arts isthanked for funding this analysis. HajoEicken of the Sea Ice Group at the\nGeophysical Institute at the University\nof Alaska Fairbanks is thanked for dis-cussions regarding, and assistance inobtaining, the sea ice radar backscatter\nmaps. We thank the NOAA personnel at\nBarrow, AK for sample collection andKristen Schulz (NOAA PMEL) for sampleanalysis. NOAA Barrow Observatory\nmeteorological and aerosol data are\navailable online (http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/obop/brw/), and Barrow seaice radar backscatter maps can be found\nonline at http://seaice.alaska.edu/gi/\ndata/barrow_radar. The PMEL contribu-tion number is 4408. Jacobi, H. W., D. Voisin, J. L. Jaffrezo, J. Cozic, and T. A. Douglas (2012), Chemical composition of the snowpack during the OASIS spring\ncampaign 2009 at Barrow, Alaska, J. Geophys. Res. ,117, D00R13, doi:10.1029/2011JD016654.\nJohnson, B. D., and P. J. Wangersky (1987), Microbubbles: Stabilization by monolayers of adsorbed particles, J. Geophys. Res. ,92(C13),\n14,641 –14,647, doi:10.1029/JC092iC13p14641.\nKeene, W. C., A. A. P. Pszenny, J. N. Galloway, and M. E. Hawley (1986), Sea-salt corrections and interpretation of constituent ratios in marine\nprecipitation, J. Geophys. Res. ,91(D6), 6647 –6658, doi:10.1029/JD091id06p06647.\nKeene, W. C., R. Sander, A. A. P. Pszenny, R. Vogt, P. J. Crutzen, and J. N. Galloway (1998), Aerosol pH in the marine boundary layer, J. Aerosol\nSci.,29(3), 339 –356, doi:10.1016/s0021-8502(97)10011-8.\nKeene, W. C., et al. (2007), Chemical and physical characteristics of nascent aerosols produced by bursting bubbles at a model air-sea\ninterface, J. Geophys. Res. ,112, D21202, doi:10.1029/2007JD008464.\nLeck, C., and C. Persson (1996), Seasonal and short-term variability in dimethyl sul fide, sulfur dioxide and biogenic sulfur and sea salt aerosol\nparticles in the arctic marine boundary layer during summer and autumn, Tellus B ,48(2), doi:10.3402/tellusb.v48i2.15891.\nLeck, C., and E. K. Bigg (1999), Aerosol production over remote marine areas —A new route, Geophys. Res. Lett. ,26(23), 3577 –3580,\ndoi:10.1029/1999GL010807.\nLeck, C., and E. Svensson (2015), Importance of aerosol composition and mixing state for cloud droplet activation over the Arctic pack ice in\nsummer, Atmos. Chem. Phys. ,15(5), 2545 –2568, doi:10.5194/acp-15-2545-2015.\nLeck, C., M. Norman, E. K. Bigg, and R. Hillamo (2002), Chemical composition and sources of the high Arctic aerosol relevant for cloud\nformation, J. Geophys. Res. ,107, 4135, doi:10.1029/2001JC001463.\nLegrand, M., X. Yang, S. Preunkert, and N. Theys (2016), Year-round records of sea salt, gaseous, and particulate inorganic bromine in the\natmospheric boundary layer at coastal (Dumont d ’Urville) and central (Concordia) East Antarctic sites, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. ,121,\n997 –1023, doi:10.1002/2015JD024066.\nLewis, E. R., and S. E. Schwartz (2004), Sea Salt Aerosol Production: Mechanisms, Methods, Measurements, and Models —A Critical Review , AGU,\nWashington, D. C.\nLieb-Lappen, R. M., and R. W. Obbard (2015), The role of blowing snow in the activation of bromine over first-year Antarctic sea ice, Atmos.\nChem. Phys. ,15(13), 7537 –7545, doi:10.5194/acp-15-7537-2015.\nMahoney, A. R., H. Eicken, A. G. Gaylord, and R. Gens (2014), Landfast sea ice extent in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas: The annual cycle and\ndecadal variability, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. ,103,4 1 –56, doi:10.1016/j.coldregions.2014.03.003.\nMaslanik, J., J. Stroeve, C. Fowler, and W. Emery (2011), Distribution and trends in Arctic sea ice age through spring 2011, Geophys. Res. Lett. ,\n38, L13502, doi:10.1029/2011GL047735.\nMcInnes, L. M., D. S. Covert, P. K. Quinn, and M. S. Germani (1994), Measurements of chloride depletion and sulfur enrichment in individual\nsea-salt particles collected from the remote marine boundary layer, J. Geophys. Res. ,99(D4), 8257, doi:10.1029/93JD03453.\nMonahan, E. C., and I. G. O ’Muircheartaigh (1986), Whitecaps and the passive remote sensing of the ocean surface, Int. J. Remote Sens. ,7(5),\n627 –642, doi:10.1080/01431168608954716.\nNewberg, J. T., B. M. Matthew, and C. Anastasio (2005), Chloride and bromide depletions in sea-salt particles over the northeastern Paci fic\nOcean, J. Geophys. Res. ,110, D06209, doi:10.1029/2004JD005446.\nNilsson, E. D., and Ü. Rannik (2001), Turbulent aerosol fluxes over the Arctic Ocean: 1. Dry deposition over sea and pack ice, J. Geophys. Res. ,\n106, 32,125-32,137, doi:10.1029/2000JD900605.\nNilsson, E. D., U. Rannik, E. Swietlicki, C. Leck, P. P. Aalto, J. Zhou, and M. Norman (2001), Turbulent aerosol fluxes over the Arctic Ocean: 2.\nWind-driven sources from the sea, J. Geophys. Res. ,106(D23), 32,139 –32,154, doi:10.1029/2000JD900747.\nNorman, A. L., L. A. Barrie, D. Toom-Sauntry, A. Sirois, H. R. Krouse, S. M. Li, and S. Sharma (1999), Sources of aerosol sulphate at Alert:\nApportionment using stable isotopes, J. Geophys. Res. ,104(D9), 11,619 –11,631, doi:10.1029/1999JD900078.\nNorris, S. J., I. M. Brooks, G. de Leeuw, A. Sirevaag, C. Leck, B. J. Brooks, C. E. Birch, and M. Tjernström (2011), Measurements of bubble size\nspectra within leads in the Arctic summer pack ice, Ocean Sci. ,7(1), 129 –139, doi:10.5194/os-7-129-2011.\nO’Dowd, C. D., M. H. Smith, I. E. Consterdine, and J. A. Lowe (1997), Marine aerosol, sea-salt, and the marine sulphur cycle: A short review,\nAtmos. Environ. ,31(1), 73 –80, doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(96)00106-9.\nOverland, J. E., and M. Wang (2013), When will the summer Arctic be nearly sea ice free?, Geophys. Res. Lett. ,40, 2097 –2101, doi:10.1002/\ngrl.50316.\nPratt, K. A., et al. (2013), Photochemical production of molecular bromine in Arctic surface snowpacks, Nat. Geosci. ,6(5), 351 –356,\ndoi:10.1038/ngeo1779.\nQuinn, P. K., D. J. Coffman, V. N. Kapustin, T. S. Bates, and D. S. Covert (1998), Aerosol optical properties in the marine boundary layer during\nthefirst Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE 1) and the underlying chemical and physical aerosol properties, J. Geophys. Res. ,\n103(D13), 16,547 –16,563, doi:10.1029/97JD02345V.\nQuinn, P. K., D. B. Collins, V. H. Grassian, K. A. Prather, and T. S. Bates (2015), Chemistry and related properties of freshly emitted sea spray\naerosol, Chem. Rev. ,115(10), 4383 –4399, doi:10.1021/cr500713g.\nQuinn, P. K., T. L. Miller, T. S. Bates, J. A. Ogren, E. Andrews, and G. E. Shaw (2002), A 3-year record of simultaneously measured aerosol\nchemical and optical properties at Barrow, Alaska, J. Geophys. Res. ,107, 4130, doi:10.1029/2001JD001248.\nRadke, L. F., P. V. Hobbs, and J. E. Pinnons (1976), Observations of cloud condensation nuclei, sodium-containing particles, ice nuclei and the\nlight-scattering coef ficient near Barrow, Alaska, J. Appl. Meteorol. ,15(9), 982 –995, doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1976)015 <0982:ooccns >2.0.\nco;2.\nRankin, A. M., V. Auld, and E. W. Wolff (2000), Frost flowers as a source of fractionated sea salt aerosol in the polar regions, Geophys. Res. Lett. ,\n27(21), 3469 –3472, doi:10.1029/2000GL011771.\nSalter, M. E., P. Zieger, J. C. Acosta Navarro, H. Grythe, A. Kirkevåg, B. Rosati, I. Riipinen, and E. D. Nilsson (2015), An empirically derived\ninorganic sea spray source function incorporating sea surface temperature, Atmos. Chem. Phys. ,15(19), 11,047 –11,066, doi:10.5194/acp-\n15-11047-2015.\nScott, W. D., and Z. Levin (1972), Open channels in sea ice (leads) as ion sources, Science ,177(4047), 425 –426, doi:10.1126/\nscience.177.4047.425.\nSeguin, A. M., A.-L. Norman, and L. Barrie (2014), Evidence of sea ice source in aerosol sulfate loading and size distribution in the Canadian\nHigh Arctic from isotopic analysis, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. ,119, 1087 –1096, doi:10.1002/2013JD020461.\nSerreze, M. C., and J. Stroeve (2015), Arctic sea ice trends, variability and implications for seasonal ice forecasting, Philos. Transact. A Math.\nPhys. Eng. Sci. ,373(2045), doi:10.1098/rsta.2014.0159.\nShepson, P. B., et al. (2012), Changing polar environments: Interdisciplinary challenges, Eos Trans. AGU ,93(11), 117, doi:10.1029/\n2012EO110001.Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 10.1002/2016JD025273\nMAY ET AL. ARCTIC SEA SALT AEROSOL 9218 Simpson, W., L. Alvarez-Aviles, T. A. Douglas, M. Sturm, and F. Domine (2005), Halogens in the coastal snow pack near Barrow, Alaska:\nEvidence for active bromine air-snow chemistry during springtime, Geophys. Res. Lett. ,32, L04811, doi:10.1029/2004GL021748.\nSirois, A., and L. A. Barrie (1999), Arctic lower tropospheric aerosol trends and composition at Alert, Canada: 1980 –1995, J. Geophys. Res. ,\n104(D9), 11,599, doi:10.1029/1999JD900077.\nStroeve, J., M. Serreze, M. Holland, J. Kay, J. Malanik, and A. Barrett (2012), The Arctic ’s rapidly shrinking sea ice cover: A research synthesis,\nClim. Change ,110(3–4), 1005 –1027, doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0101-1.\nStruthers, H., A. M. L. Ekman, P. Glantz, T. Iversen, A. Kirkevag, E. M. Martensson, O. Seland, and E. D. Nilsson (2011), The effect of sea ice loss on sea\nsalt aerosol concentrations and the radiative balance in the Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys. ,11(7), 3459 –3477, doi:10.5194/acp-11-3459-2011.\nSturges, W. T., and L. A. Barrie (1988), Chlorine, bromine and iodine in Arctic aerosols, Atmos. Environ. ,22(6), 1179 –1194, doi:10.1016/0004-\n6981(88)90349-6.\nTjernström, M., et al. (2012), Meteorological conditions in the central Arctic summer during the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS),\nAtmos. Chem. Phys. ,12(15), 6863 –6889, doi:10.5194/acp-12-6863-2012.\nWilliams, J., M. de Reus, R. Krejci, H. Fischer, and J. Ström (2002), Application of the variability-size relationship to atmospheric aerosol studie s:\nestimating aerosol lifetimes and ages, Atmos. Chem. Phys. ,2(2), 133 –145, doi:10.5194/acp-2-133-2002.\nWise, M. E., E. J. Freney, C. A. Tyree, J. O. Allen, S. T. Martin, L. M. Russell, and P. R. Buseck (2009), Hygroscopic behavior and liquid-layer\ncomposition of aerosol particles generated from natural and arti ficial seawater, J. Geophys. Res. ,114, D03201, doi:10.1029/2008JD010449.\nYang, X., J. A. Pyle, and R. A. Cox (2008), Sea salt aerosol production and bromine release: Role of snow on sea ice, Geophys. Res. Lett. ,35,\nL16815, doi:10.1029/2008GL034536.\nYin, Y., Z. Levin, T. G. Reisin, and S. Tzivion (2000), The effects of giant cloud condensation nuclei on the development of precipitation in\nconvective clouds —A numerical study, Atmos. Res. ,53(1–3), 91 –116, doi:10.1016/s0169-8095(99)00046-0.Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 10.1002/2016JD025273\nMAY ET AL. ARCTIC SEA SALT AEROSOL 9219"
} |
[
0.013606198132038116,
-0.01095722895115614,
0.04838210716843605,
0.012672165408730507,
0.023694902658462524,
-0.07712710648775101,
-0.08404721319675446,
0.06166940554976463,
-0.03356260433793068,
0.014529999345541,
0.035345591604709625,
-0.028570307418704033,
0.02183632180094719,
0.02159165032207966,
-0.014097796753048897,
0.017155833542346954,
0.01919901929795742,
0.05615994334220886,
-0.004194017034024,
0.03879677876830101,
0.046287186443805695,
0.04273274913430214,
0.03279722481966019,
0.028478555381298065,
-0.07791489362716675,
0.08519618213176727,
-0.036795951426029205,
0.06313272565603256,
0.02458431012928486,
-0.07084246724843979,
-0.0015359658282250166,
0.03815563768148422,
-0.042312197387218475,
-0.004188081715255976,
0.10332848876714706,
0.08404307812452316,
-0.09167899191379547,
0.03131377324461937,
-0.0013290717033669353,
-0.031500574201345444,
-0.03675108402967453,
-0.05487235635519028,
0.08657620847225189,
-0.0017808866687119007,
0.06549552083015442,
0.024535909295082092,
0.04102889075875282,
-0.12067858129739761,
0.06346916407346725,
-0.008806142024695873,
-0.004630037117749453,
-0.0357719287276268,
0.04363343492150307,
-0.048798371106386185,
-0.052509043365716934,
0.014176965691149235,
-0.02443031221628189,
-0.01967671327292919,
0.054012663662433624,
-0.08292993158102036,
0.05432193726301193,
-0.06881745904684067,
-0.03972005099058151,
-0.047858525067567825,
-0.022602178156375885,
-0.05454646795988083,
-0.02093123272061348,
-0.11272064596414566,
0.024958908557891846,
0.017110681161284447,
0.0023414737079292536,
0.013909039087593555,
-0.06740723550319672,
-0.017370840534567833,
0.01578351855278015,
0.03719307482242584,
0.056903060525655746,
0.10745019465684891,
-0.009013419039547443,
-0.05218179523944855,
0.08089175820350647,
0.0033176455181092024,
-0.035788219422101974,
-0.040916699916124344,
-0.05579967051744461,
-0.03560049086809158,
-0.01868204027414322,
0.08403123915195465,
0.05251135677099228,
-0.012051697820425034,
0.006912376265972853,
0.009651458822190762,
-0.12185517698526382,
0.029529841616749763,
-0.0072417790070176125,
-0.006416670512408018,
0.01775752194225788,
-0.025672361254692078,
-0.019429899752140045,
-0.02334313467144966,
0.030791914090514183,
0.050375666469335556,
-0.10854043811559677,
0.04827572777867317,
-0.006630427204072475,
-0.026125933974981308,
0.038195088505744934,
0.03365769609808922,
0.13945457339286804,
0.06448677182197571,
0.048978108912706375,
-0.07954910397529602,
0.0049156430177390575,
0.03155532106757164,
0.018720895051956177,
-0.025495300069451332,
-0.10765685886144638,
0.0963253378868103,
-0.021747054532170296,
0.07152561098337173,
0.013293004594743252,
0.009133664891123772,
0.02970227599143982,
-0.04824279993772507,
0.05681198835372925,
-0.01487957313656807,
-0.013046284206211567,
5.64181378944637e-33,
0.034964147955179214,
0.0434107705950737,
-0.05075182020664215,
0.06862690299749374,
-0.03898364678025246,
-0.009672129526734352,
-0.005507745314389467,
0.03580515459179878,
-0.0412571057677269,
0.004871673416346312,
-0.05112336948513985,
-0.03481127321720123,
-0.07562192529439926,
0.007267425302416086,
-0.021540777757763863,
0.02248280867934227,
0.030304355546832085,
-0.014859647490084171,
-0.13913682103157043,
-0.021404098719358444,
0.04314836487174034,
-0.13025179505348206,
-0.04527319222688675,
0.02021021582186222,
0.10823676735162735,
0.012004795484244823,
-0.008190632797777653,
-0.05155617743730545,
0.007018780801445246,
0.028490545228123665,
-0.12909533083438873,
0.021543556824326515,
-0.05017809197306633,
-0.011426261626183987,
0.04574442654848099,
0.06651051342487335,
0.01646146923303604,
0.030257025733590126,
-0.006618482060730457,
-0.025642095133662224,
-0.030466627329587936,
-0.026327382773160934,
0.01854146458208561,
-0.03442339971661568,
-0.009897379204630852,
-0.026495298370718956,
0.08710142970085144,
0.009307161904871464,
0.02853788249194622,
0.03368903696537018,
0.0023409773129969835,
0.009428543969988823,
0.0327720008790493,
0.02174553833901882,
0.032940417528152466,
-0.047038912773132324,
-0.006747544277459383,
-0.05935224890708923,
-0.058709658682346344,
0.09586982429027557,
0.00696290098130703,
0.004083830863237381,
-0.018354516476392746,
0.02083226665854454,
-0.03977331519126892,
0.004317332524806261,
-0.09310534596443176,
0.021160773932933807,
-0.010072722099721432,
0.04789373651146889,
-0.023812085390090942,
0.015200255438685417,
0.0008239878807216883,
-0.03893231227993965,
-0.041294459253549576,
-0.098113052546978,
0.029131155461072922,
0.04625162109732628,
0.049765199422836304,
0.01291574165225029,
-0.05158234015107155,
-0.0024200729094445705,
-0.0057577756233513355,
-0.05790947377681732,
-0.05324401333928108,
-0.005636546295136213,
0.016141122207045555,
-0.02213016152381897,
-0.009622801095247269,
-0.10064460337162018,
-0.0506480410695076,
-0.07084544003009796,
0.02467615157365799,
-0.0005126664764247835,
-0.0291507039219141,
-5.390437261258901e-33,
0.01947883516550064,
0.025448761880397797,
0.034620098769664764,
0.025600943714380264,
-0.00542496656998992,
0.03126511722803116,
0.0811658576130867,
0.034058284014463425,
-0.12819422781467438,
-0.10125181078910828,
-0.09530376642942429,
0.02038760483264923,
0.03953901305794716,
-0.06746871024370193,
-0.0071026114746928215,
0.046904392540454865,
0.009964280761778355,
-0.06558568775653839,
0.03868448734283447,
0.06814957410097122,
0.03977039083838463,
0.09792639315128326,
-0.042758166790008545,
-0.09162111580371857,
0.06540796905755997,
0.035249002277851105,
0.05961092188954353,
-0.015973970293998718,
-0.02755756489932537,
0.015954937785863876,
-0.021460162475705147,
0.04025090113282204,
-0.022643504664301872,
-0.04373614490032196,
0.019863879308104515,
0.05563943088054657,
-0.02452145889401436,
-0.06278971582651138,
-0.03629244118928909,
0.04798438400030136,
0.09378669410943985,
0.03003811091184616,
-0.05999385565519333,
0.020120222121477127,
0.003950046841055155,
-0.03502531349658966,
0.07834064215421677,
0.07334961742162704,
0.022085627540946007,
0.07323848456144333,
0.03220514953136444,
-0.00808859895914793,
-0.057634953409433365,
0.050756536424160004,
0.030544927343726158,
0.008741526864469051,
-0.06269124150276184,
0.046250540763139725,
-0.06569628417491913,
-0.07375679910182953,
0.007556852884590626,
0.013489453122019768,
-0.056525811553001404,
0.04643500968813896,
-0.02032424509525299,
0.04015844315290451,
0.012713141739368439,
0.11321713030338287,
-0.08910183608531952,
0.08289394527673721,
-0.08619388937950134,
-0.03040207177400589,
0.08203883469104767,
-0.027890175580978394,
0.10511612147092819,
-0.012972686439752579,
0.008492850698530674,
-0.04012254998087883,
0.04579285904765129,
-0.027135737240314484,
-0.067491814494133,
0.022422801703214645,
0.045661017298698425,
0.053773216903209686,
0.09388640522956848,
0.06177955120801926,
-0.08930196613073349,
0.05061184987425804,
-0.04789070039987564,
0.011709756217896938,
-0.00796621385961771,
-0.11741884052753448,
0.021351881325244904,
0.06445524841547012,
-0.016729893162846565,
-5.7491345017979256e-8,
0.022541478276252747,
0.07185646146535873,
-0.014048297889530659,
-0.015002080239355564,
0.021167272701859474,
-0.015502518974244595,
0.050327882170677185,
0.054575808346271515,
-0.03368217498064041,
0.015485953539609909,
0.041797198355197906,
-0.032490577548742294,
-0.014480550773441792,
0.07054544240236282,
-0.003994013648480177,
0.0894133523106575,
0.01213162112981081,
0.03125976398587227,
-0.059710219502449036,
-0.02841166965663433,
-0.04202473536133766,
-0.041289281100034714,
0.00044486933620646596,
0.003064054762944579,
-0.007758278399705887,
0.07928197830915451,
-0.057735223323106766,
-0.0018457064870744944,
-0.00013147012214176357,
-0.09309113025665283,
-0.011743830516934395,
-0.05044810473918915,
0.005017795599997044,
0.020654914900660515,
0.009507150389254093,
0.027403581887483597,
-0.033129092305898666,
0.034744784235954285,
0.06279702484607697,
0.08199569582939148,
-0.06481186300516129,
0.026623370125889778,
0.018739916384220123,
0.033749084919691086,
-0.09028685092926025,
0.00867397803813219,
-0.06791219115257263,
-0.07037071138620377,
-0.06696817278862,
-0.02163165621459484,
-0.0793766900897026,
-0.0003124348586425185,
0.0019504375522956252,
0.09338030964136124,
0.1332426220178604,
0.06638631969690323,
0.021276570856571198,
-0.015534967184066772,
-0.0980071872472763,
0.07827909290790558,
-0.016258953139185905,
0.01157208438962698,
-0.07786175608634949,
-0.06379988044500351
] | {
"pdf_file": "W72HAHPKTD73IK72BPHF6NQMI365DGPL.pdf",
"text": "Mars Exploration Rover MissionMars Exploration Rover Mission\nWeek in ReviewMay 22 - May 28SpiritandOpportunitySpiritandOpportunity Opportunity continues to cruise around therocky rim of Endurance Crater, which is about430 feet (130 meters) in diameter.Opportunity continues to cruise around therocky rim of Endurance Crater, which is about430 feet (130 meters) in diameter.\nNavigation camera mosaic taken on May 21, 2004.\n Team members are analyzing images andsearching for the safest route, if any,to enter and exit Endurance Crater.Team members are analyzing images andsearching for the safest route, if any,to enter and exit Endurance Crater.\nPrincipal Investigator, Steve Squyres, in a mobility meeting at Jet Propulsion Laboratory May 28, 2004. Scientists and engineers are trying to find a locationwith more stable rock than loose sand.Scientists and engineers are trying to find a locationwith more stable rock than loose sand.\nPossible area to enter Endurance Crater: Karatepe.\n Simultaneously, mobility experts, scientists, andengineers are testing the rover’s slip limits onsimulated martian soil and rock at a 25-degree tilt.Simultaneously, mobility experts, scientists, andengineers are testing the rover’s slip limits onsimulated martian soil and rock at a 25-degree tilt.\nEngineering model of the rover during the sandbox test outside of the “Mars Yard” at Jet Propulsion Laboratory May 27, 2004. Meanwhile, Spirit took a break from its daily long drivesand spent May 21st observing the martian soil.Meanwhile, Spirit took a break from its daily long drivesand spent May 21st observing the martian soil.\nSpirit used its wheel to dig a trench, and then used itsinstruments to investigate the newly exposed surface.Spirit used its wheel to dig a trench, and then used itsinstruments to investigate the newly exposed surface.\nFront hazard avoidance camera image received on Earth May 26, 2004. Spirit’s odometernow reads 1.6 miles(2,585 meters).The rover still has to go0.42 miles (680 meters)before reaching the baseof the Columbia Hills byaround sol 150 or 160.Spirit’s odometernow reads 1.6 miles(2,585 meters).The rover still has to go0.42 miles (680 meters)before reaching the baseof the Columbia Hills byaround sol 150 or 160.\nNavigation camera image taken on sol 135 at 3:33:58 p.m. Mars local solar time. COMING UP!COMING UP!\nOpportunity’s teamwill continue testing,researching, andmeeting to figure outhow to enterEndurance Crater.Opportunity’s teamwill continue testing,researching, andmeeting to figure outhow to enterEndurance Crater.Spirit will continue to makeregular stops along the wayto the Columbia Hillsto study the soil and rocks.Spirit will continue to makeregular stops along the wayto the Columbia Hillsto study the soil and rocks.\nMay 28, 2004\nClose-up view of soilfrom Spirit’smicroscopic imager."
} |
[
-0.04660312831401825,
0.019838856533169746,
0.06226228177547455,
0.01944759301841259,
-0.028917038813233376,
-0.011654820293188095,
-0.032383665442466736,
0.01963861659169197,
0.000015791943951626308,
-0.061571989208459854,
0.05964653566479683,
0.008928862400352955,
-0.006554083898663521,
-0.006344342604279518,
0.012182035483419895,
-0.07101017981767654,
0.09218159317970276,
0.00883853156119585,
-0.01810690201818943,
0.007917861454188824,
0.11452431976795197,
0.06319914013147354,
-0.03699205070734024,
0.005108437035232782,
0.03901829198002815,
0.060032881796360016,
-0.05737663060426712,
0.04796324297785759,
0.06703287363052368,
-0.017692675814032555,
-0.053817737847566605,
-0.0007232933421619236,
-0.07736805081367493,
-0.040801409631967545,
0.15432237088680267,
0.048256561160087585,
-0.05766779184341431,
-0.042470019310712814,
0.07942474633455276,
0.015650896355509758,
0.003924128133803606,
-0.07417134940624237,
-0.026402371004223824,
0.08383577316999435,
-0.06736750155687332,
-0.04842890799045563,
0.040128957480192184,
0.006718731019645929,
0.013270077295601368,
-0.034778740257024765,
0.08748019486665726,
0.03601260855793953,
-0.005344997625797987,
0.11568070203065872,
0.02319399267435074,
-0.06000865623354912,
0.02011827751994133,
-0.0417218878865242,
0.02510124072432518,
-0.005064412485808134,
0.05649850144982338,
-0.016035621985793114,
-0.039808325469493866,
-0.014563408680260181,
0.014153052121400833,
0.0184240210801363,
-0.01167302206158638,
-0.028378281742334366,
0.04430438205599785,
-0.0628950223326683,
0.05983462929725647,
-0.056070003658533096,
-0.07120626419782639,
0.06726290285587311,
0.0718420222401619,
0.06903521716594696,
-0.020681107416749,
0.07251355797052383,
0.05083921179175377,
-0.1493755578994751,
0.06108855456113815,
-0.011014478281140327,
-0.002015422796830535,
-0.13290376961231232,
-0.08517581969499588,
-0.05462589114904404,
0.0037706869188696146,
0.08024777472019196,
0.11193423718214035,
0.017553038895130157,
0.055104125291109085,
0.032186321914196014,
0.04462738707661629,
-0.04442765191197395,
0.05025661364197731,
-0.04043246805667877,
-0.02641064114868641,
-0.04528217390179634,
0.022894132882356644,
0.03468100726604462,
0.07204345613718033,
0.025602681562304497,
-0.09837085753679276,
-0.0022102941293269396,
0.03170377016067505,
-0.011224321089684963,
-0.027835695073008537,
-0.0007917492766864598,
0.007643205113708973,
-0.04021941125392914,
-0.03646219149231911,
0.0004280183056835085,
0.035914309322834015,
-0.04787559434771538,
-0.04088307172060013,
0.08384117484092712,
-0.06208822503685951,
-0.01490448322147131,
0.06760891526937485,
-0.10395022481679916,
-0.04617659002542496,
-0.027770737186074257,
0.021784484386444092,
0.026272311806678772,
0.05547761917114258,
0.021993037313222885,
-0.060965023934841156,
5.267916219756663e-33,
-0.11425606906414032,
-0.06765995919704437,
-0.012043526396155357,
0.021101899445056915,
0.0021655187010765076,
-0.026071539148688316,
-0.03178023546934128,
-0.07093418389558792,
0.0009625962702557445,
0.007032627705484629,
-0.02836655266582966,
0.004038846120238304,
-0.0053560915403068066,
-0.06962604820728302,
-0.01895240508019924,
-0.06073825806379318,
0.0480370856821537,
0.027598891407251358,
0.06021461635828018,
-0.02883082441985607,
0.00479296687990427,
0.006760983727872372,
0.019940512254834175,
0.032815515995025635,
-0.08118204772472382,
0.02887597680091858,
-0.09991326928138733,
-0.08895433694124222,
-0.007126594427973032,
0.05470336973667145,
0.053805429488420486,
0.008372566662728786,
0.0020860861986875534,
-0.006105070002377033,
-0.029060132801532745,
-0.015079236589372158,
0.000054071297199698165,
-0.04703989624977112,
-0.020762423053383827,
-0.06369445472955704,
-0.08594994992017746,
0.03874063491821289,
-0.03883012756705284,
0.016878627240657806,
-0.009170868434011936,
-0.08622296154499054,
0.05841425806283951,
0.05629858002066612,
0.005131061188876629,
0.04835408553481102,
0.01808452419936657,
-0.0044828373938798904,
0.0001234579976880923,
-0.064684197306633,
-0.015009729191660881,
-0.024118462577462196,
-0.03398323431611061,
0.009369523264467716,
0.014593446627259254,
-0.002507604891434312,
0.01013433001935482,
0.15924659371376038,
-0.046385008841753006,
0.011595604941248894,
0.02800889126956463,
-0.01601245254278183,
-0.058166198432445526,
-0.04122829809784889,
0.026965638622641563,
-0.012985658831894398,
-0.008083649910986423,
-0.020489932969212532,
0.01806425116956234,
0.0337013304233551,
0.0501631461083889,
-0.06188912317156792,
0.011371111497282982,
0.05158816650509834,
-0.02884942851960659,
-0.006402311380952597,
-0.04104700684547424,
-0.03379819914698601,
0.003094617510214448,
-0.011713319458067417,
-0.0012688126880675554,
-0.059399016201496124,
-0.020921213552355766,
-0.047017939388751984,
-0.049022555351257324,
0.03582929074764252,
0.03628671541810036,
0.03286901116371155,
-0.005442167166620493,
0.08571676909923553,
0.08000112324953079,
-6.133110184004607e-33,
0.03998856246471405,
0.01970951445400715,
-0.05295441299676895,
-0.1179770976305008,
-0.05394791439175606,
-0.03101394698023796,
-0.0017315613804385066,
-0.05799678713083267,
0.0008013726328499615,
-0.03224054351449013,
-0.03647111356258392,
0.016086189076304436,
-0.00616089440882206,
-0.013203710317611694,
-0.03751043602824211,
0.006008726079016924,
-0.012577184475958347,
-0.013245735317468643,
-0.09412305057048798,
0.047334469854831696,
-0.009303562343120575,
0.01997678168118,
-0.0357244499027729,
0.05936666950583458,
-0.05864356458187103,
0.05681249126791954,
-0.017874952405691147,
0.018600568175315857,
0.017669379711151123,
-0.040311239659786224,
0.0038541569374501705,
0.014237851835787296,
-0.08005621284246445,
0.05972721427679062,
-0.0347856730222702,
-0.1067783311009407,
0.03245550021529198,
0.07056698948144913,
-0.02243148908019066,
0.002634065691381693,
0.06596960127353668,
0.09724075347185135,
0.028911186382174492,
0.08232034742832184,
-0.03358174487948418,
0.0019401779863983393,
0.11445426195859909,
-0.06179781258106232,
0.031190840527415276,
-0.014083157293498516,
-0.03583357483148575,
-0.006834349595010281,
0.05998353660106659,
0.04512523114681244,
0.016136137768626213,
0.08474574238061905,
0.1110917180776596,
0.02862391620874405,
-0.002048696391284466,
0.008207054808735847,
0.1302071064710617,
0.04684760421514511,
0.08472321182489395,
-0.024614080786705017,
0.05092816427350044,
0.007552810478955507,
-0.07555190473794937,
-0.04105940833687782,
0.0706576257944107,
-0.0008475874783471227,
-0.006749373394995928,
-0.02414034865796566,
-0.06536851078271866,
-0.140920490026474,
0.06716976314783096,
0.08317862451076508,
0.05889828875660896,
-0.03142918273806572,
-0.1119488999247551,
-0.058475062251091,
-0.07247345894575119,
0.07608220726251602,
-0.10250958055257797,
-0.009176448918879032,
0.07272543013095856,
-0.030529014766216278,
0.014780906960368156,
-0.09245812892913818,
0.10423997789621353,
0.027148941531777382,
-0.032114312052726746,
0.014450707472860813,
-0.02119387872517109,
0.03271208330988884,
-0.06994365155696869,
-5.52398020658984e-8,
-0.07100716233253479,
0.011782036162912846,
-0.006193568464368582,
0.02672756090760231,
0.0782475396990776,
0.02465084195137024,
0.021456483751535416,
0.038631509989500046,
-0.01152583584189415,
-0.0008568029152229428,
0.03766176477074623,
-0.011965143494307995,
0.006229718215763569,
-0.04042455926537514,
-0.05249590799212456,
-0.06843052059412003,
-0.05302537605166435,
0.03230791911482811,
-0.05220218002796173,
-0.03968933969736099,
-0.06686864048242569,
-0.08740276843309402,
-0.029160819947719574,
0.06468172371387482,
-0.025707243010401726,
-0.030971938744187355,
0.08822107315063477,
0.006876285187900066,
0.08314812183380127,
0.04163335636258125,
0.061717689037323,
0.04058237746357918,
0.0030307285487651825,
0.02155310846865177,
0.00525252241641283,
-0.027088817209005356,
-0.03455476462841034,
0.09148991107940674,
-0.059909235686063766,
0.0059834737330675125,
-0.07021915912628174,
0.023110806941986084,
-0.018226642161607742,
0.05354059860110283,
0.058906190097332,
0.018959445878863335,
-0.08490912616252899,
0.029592521488666534,
0.07669714093208313,
-0.01653703860938549,
-0.00474436953663826,
-0.08114148676395416,
-0.04426373168826103,
0.045829713344573975,
0.03464144095778465,
0.019812086597085,
-0.0035373286809772253,
0.03464401140809059,
-0.04901493340730667,
-0.02674766071140766,
-0.0017583881272003055,
0.015777137130498886,
-0.0064550405368208885,
-0.0158893633633852
] | {
"pdf_file": "666HXEHN6OLTL3QKGACG3DJ7UL4L5NWL.pdf",
"text": "17065 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 9, 2002 / Notices\nDEPARTMENT OF ENERGY\nFederal Energy Regulatory\nCommission\n[Docket No. CP02 –125–000]\nTexas Gas Transmission Corporation;\nNotice of Application\nApril 3, 2002.\nTake notice that on March 27, 2002,\nTexas Gas Transmission Corporation(Texas Gas), 3800 Frederica Street,Owensboro, Kentucky 42301, filed inDocket No. CP02 –125–000, for: (1) An\napplication pursuant to section 7(b) ofthe Natural Gas Act (NGA) forauthorization to abandon by sale to ATPOil & Gas Corporation (ATP) certainsupply lateral facilities extending fromWest Cameron Area Block 237 to WestCameron Area Block 250, offshoreLouisiana and (2) a request forjurisdictional determination that, uponapproval of the abandonment by sale,such facilities will be gatheringfacilities, and ATP ’s ownership and\noperation of the subject supply lateralfacilities will be exempt fromCommission jurisdiction under theNGA, all as more fully set forth in theapplication which is on file with theCommission and open to publicinspection. Copies of this filing are onfile with the Commission and areavailable for public inspection. Thisfiling may be viewed on the web athttp://www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘RIMS ’’\nlink, select ‘‘Docket # ’’ from the RIMS\nMenu and follow the instructions (call(202) 208 –2222 for assistance).\nTexas Gas states that it has entered\ninto an agreement with ATP wherebyTexas Gas will, upon Commission\napproval, transfer by sale to ATP certainsupply lateral facilities consisting ofapproximately 4.436 miles of 12-inchdiameter pipeline, measurementfacilities, and various valves andequipment, located in West CameronArea Block 237 and terminating in WestCameron Area Block 250, offshoreLouisiana.\nTexas Gas indicates that the proposed\nabandonment will permit Texas Gas todivest itself of a supply lateral, which isremote from, and not integrated with, itsmainline transmission system, andwhich was constructed to support itsformer merchant function. Texas Gasavers that it no longer requires thesubject supply lateral to access gassupplies, and that these facilities are notintegral to Texas Gas ’ current role as an\nopen-access transporter. Texas Gasasserts that abandonment of the subjectfacilities will enable Texas Gas tostreamline its transmission operationsby eliminating certain operating costsassociated with maintaining facilities\nthat are not part of Texas Gas ’\ncontiguous system.\nTexas Gas states that the transfer of\nthe subject supply lateral facilities willnot adversely affect any of their currentcustomers. Texas Gas declares that thereare no firm transportation commitmentsinvolving utilization of those facilities.Texas Gas avers that after the transfer,ATP indicates that it will provide non-jurisdictional service on a non-discriminatory basis. Texas Gas assertsthat availability of service through thesefacilities will not be impaired as a resultof Texas Gas ’ transfer of these facilities\nto ATP.\nTexas Gas states that ATP will pay\nTexas Gas the sum of $100 for TexasGas’ interest (100%) in the facilities.\nTexas Gas indicates that in recognitionof the costs associated with any futureretirement of these facilities by ATP, anagreement provides for Texas Gas to payATP actual and reasonable costsassociated with retirement up to$100,000.\nAny questions regarding this\napplication should be directed to DavidN. Roberts, Manager of Certificates andTariffs, Texas Gas TransmissionCorporation, P.O. Box 20008,Owensboro, Kentucky 42304, at (270)688–6712.\nThere are two ways to become\ninvolved in the Commission ’s review of\nthis project. First, any person wishing toobtain legal status by becoming a partyto the proceedings for this projectshould, on or before April 24, 2002, filewith the Federal Energy RegulatoryCommission, 888 First Street, NE.,Washington, DC 20426, a motion tointervene in accordance with therequirements of the Commission ’s Rules\nof Practice and Procedure (18 CFR385.214 or 385.211) and the Regulationsunder the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). Aperson obtaining party status will beplaced on the service list maintained bythe Secretary of the Commission andwill receive copies of all documentsfiled by the applicant and by all otherparties. A party must submit 14 copiesof filings made with the Commissionand must mail a copy to the applicantand to every other party in theproceeding. Only parties to theproceeding can ask for court review ofCommission orders in the proceeding.\nHowever, a person does not have to\nintervene in order to have commentsconsidered. The second way toparticipate is by filing with theSecretary of the Commission, as soon aspossible, an original and two copies ofcomments in support of or in oppositionto this project. The Commission willconsider these comments indetermining the appropriate action to be\ntaken, but the filing of a comment alonewill not serve to make the filer a partyto the proceeding. The Commission ’s\nrules require that persons filingcomments in opposition to the projectprovide copies of their protests only tothe party or parties directly involved inthe protest.\nPersons who wish to comment only\non the environmental review of thisproject should submit an original andtwo copies of their comments to theSecretary of the Commission.Environmental commenters will beplaced on the Commission ’s\nenvironmental mailing list, will receivecopies of the environmental documents,and will be notified of meetingsassociated with the Commission ’s\nenvironmental review process.Environmental commenters will not berequired to serve copies of fileddocuments on all other parties.However, the non-party commenterswill not receive copies of all documentsfiled by other parties or issued by theCommission (except for the mailing ofenvironmental documents issued by theCommission) and will not have the rightto seek court review of theCommission ’s final order.\nThe Commission may issue a\npreliminary determination on non-environmental issues prior to thecompletion of its review of theenvironmental aspects of the project.This preliminary determinationtypically considers such issues as theneed for the project and its economiceffect on existing customers of theapplicant, on other pipelines in the area,and on landowners and communities.For example, the Commission considersthe extent to which the applicant mayneed to exercise eminent domain toobtain rights-of-way for the proposedproject and balances that against thenon-environmental benefits to beprovided by the project. Therefore, if aperson has comments on communityand landowner impacts from thisproposal, it is important either to filecomments or to intervene as early in theprocess as possible.\nComments, protests and interventions\nmay be filed electronically via theInternet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructionson the Commission ’s web site under the\n‘‘e-Filing ’’ link.\nIf the Commission decides to set the\napplication for a formal hearing beforean Administrative Law Judge, theCommission will issue another noticedescribing that process. At the end ofthe Commission ’s review process, a\nVerDate 11<MAY>2000 21:27 Apr 08, 2002 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\\FR\\FM\\09APN1.SGM pfrm01 PsN: 09APN1 17066 Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 9, 2002 / Notices\nfinal Commission order approving or\ndenying a certificate will be issued.\nMagalie R. Salas,\nSecretary.[FR Doc. 02 –8504 Filed 4 –8–02; 8:45 am]\nBILLING CODE 6717 –01–P\nDEPARTMENT OF ENERGY\nFederal Energy Regulatory\nCommission\n[Docket No. ER02 –504–003, et al.]\nDayton Power and Light Company, et\nal.; Electric Rate and CorporateRegulation Filings\nApril 3, 2002.\nTake notice that the following filings\nhave been made with the Commission.Any comments should be submitted inaccordance with Standard Paragraph Eat the end of this notice.\n1. Dayton Power and Light Company\n[Docket No. ER02 –504–003]\nTake notice that on March 28, 2002,\nDayton Power and Light (DP&L)tendered for filing an amendment to aservice agreement between The DaytonPower and Light Company (DP&L) andDP&L Energy Services in the abovecaptioned docket.\nComment Date: April 18, 2002.\n2. New York Independent System\nOperator, Inc.\n[Docket No. ER02 –638–001]\nTake notice that on March 29, 2002,\nthe New York System Operator, Inc.(NYISO) filed revisions to its OpenAccess Transmission Tariff and ServicesTariff pursuant to the Commission ’s\nFebruary 26, 2002 order. The purpose ofthis filing is to eliminate tariffprovisions pertaining to the NYISO ’s\nthree proposed pre-schedulingenhancements which the February 26Order rejected without prejudice. TheNYISO has requested an effective dateof April 11, 2002, for the compliancefiling.\nThe NYISO has mailed a copy of this\ncompliance filing to all persons thathave filed interconnection applicationsor executed Service Agreements underthe NYISO Open Access TransmissionTariff, to the New York State PublicService Commission, and to the electricutility regulatory agencies in New Jerseyand Pennsylvania. The NYISO has alsomailed a copy to each person designatedon the official service list maintained bythe Commission for the above-captionedproceeding.\nComment Date: April 19, 2002.3. Entergy Power Ventures, L.P.\n[Docket No. ER02 –862–001]\nTake notice that on March 29, 2002,\nEntergy Power Ventures, L.P., tenderedfor filing with the Federal EnergyRegulatory Commission (Commission)revised tariff sheets pursuant to aCommission order issued on March 19,2002.\nCopies of this filing have been served\non the Arkansas Public ServiceCommission, Mississippi Public ServiceCommission, Louisiana Public ServiceCommission, Texas Public UtilityCommission, and the Council of the Cityof New Orleans.\nComment Date: April 19, 2002.\n4. California Independent System\nOperator Corporation\n[Docket No. ER02 –1403 –000]\nTake notice that on March 29, 2002,\nthe California Independent SystemOperator Corporation, (ISO) tendered forfiling with the Federal EnergyRegulatory Commission (Commission) aParticipating Generator Agreementbetween the ISO and El DoradoIrrigation District for acceptance by theCommission.\nThe ISO states that this filing has been\nserved on El Dorado Irrigation Districtand the California Public UtilitiesCommission. The ISO is requestingwaiver of the 60-day notice requirementto allow the Participating GeneratorAgreement to be made effective March19, 2002.\nComment Date: April 19, 2002.\n5. California Independent System\nOperator Corporation\n[Docket No. ER02 –1404 –000]\nTake notice that on March 29, 2002,\nthe California Independent SystemOperator Corporation, (ISO) tendered forfiling with the Federal EnergyRegulatory Commission (Commission) aParticipating Generator Agreementbetween the ISO and El DoradoIrrigation District for acceptance by theCommission.\nThe ISO states that this filing has been\nserved on El Dorado Irrigation Districtand the California Public UtilitiesCommission. The ISO is requestingwaiver of the 60-day notice requirementto allow the Participating GeneratorAgreement to be made effective March19, 2002.\nComment Date: April 19, 2002.\n6. Northeast Utilities Service Company\n[Docket No. ER02 –1405 –000]\nTake notice that on March 29, 2002,\nNortheast Utilities Service Company(NUSCO), on behalf of The ConnecticutLight and Power Company, WesternMassachusetts Electric Company,\nHolyoke Water Power Company, andSelect Energy, Inc., submitted pursuantto Section 205 of the Federal Power Actand Part 35 of the Federal EnergyRegulatory Commission ’s (Commission)\nregulations, rate schedule changes forsales of electricity to the City ofChicopee, Massachusetts (Chicopee).\nNUSCO states that a copy of this filing\nhas been mailed to Chicopee and theregulatory commission for theCommonwealth of Massachusetts.NUSCO requests that the rate schedulechanges become effective on March 31,2002.\nComment Date: April 19, 2002.\n7. Acadia Power Partners, LLC\n[Docket No. ER02 –1406 –000]\nTake notice that on March 29, 2002,\nAcadia Power Partners, LLC (theApplicant) tendered for filing, undersection 205 of the Federal Power Act(FPA), a request for authorization tomake wholesale sales of electric energy,capacity, replacement reserves, andancillary services at market-based rates,to reassign transmission capacity, and toresell firm transmission rights.Applicant proposes to own and operatea nominal 1100-megawatt electricgeneration facility located in Louisiana.Applicant also submitted for filing twopower purchase agreements for which itrequests privileged treatment.\nComment Date: April 19, 2002.\n8. Entergy Services, Inc.\n[Docket No. ER02 –1407 –000]\nTake notice that on March 29, 2002,\nEntergy Services, Inc., (Entergy) onbehalf of Entergy Arkansas, Inc.,tendered for filing a Long-Term MarketRate Sales Agreement between EntergyArkansas, Inc. and East Texas ElectricCooperative, Inc. under EntergyServices, Inc. ’’s Rate Schedule SP.\nEntergy requests an effective date of\nMarch 1, 2002.\nComment Date: April 19, 2002.\n9. Entergy Services, Inc.\n[Docket No. ER02 –1408 –000]\nTake notice that on March 29, 2002,\nEntergy Services, Inc., on behalf ofEntergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy GulfStates, Inc., Entergy Louisiana, Inc.,Entergy Mississippi, Inc., and EntergyNew Orleans, Inc., (collectively, theEntergy Operating Companies) tenderedfor filing a Non-Firm Point-To-PointTransmission Service Agreement and aShort-Term Firm Point-To-PointTransmission Service Agreement bothbetween Entergy Services, Inc., as agentfor the Entergy Operating Companies,and TECO EnergySource, Inc.\nVerDate 11<MAY>2000 21:27 Apr 08, 2002 Jkt 197001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\\FR\\FM\\09APN1.SGM pfrm01 PsN: 09APN1"
} |
[
0.002647381043061614,
0.045594505965709686,
-0.024643592536449432,
-0.042809538543224335,
-0.000934031733777374,
0.0677371472120285,
-0.011806130409240723,
0.10106918960809708,
-0.05000176280736923,
0.0014772871509194374,
-0.01550168264657259,
0.12565745413303375,
0.029574820771813393,
-0.03914472088217735,
0.012890012003481388,
-0.0020439340732991695,
0.006723994389176369,
-0.008462784811854362,
-0.04381784424185753,
0.08162366598844528,
0.04691845923662186,
0.07464822381734848,
0.00844625011086464,
0.07282914966344833,
-0.00448961416259408,
0.06469326466321945,
-0.08536814153194427,
-0.0535457469522953,
-0.04281657561659813,
0.017055721953511238,
0.05968828871846199,
0.026395821943879128,
0.023192334920167923,
0.03368965536355972,
0.030095383524894714,
-0.01565251313149929,
-0.07258404791355133,
0.05232987552881241,
-0.014477956108748913,
0.015317306853830814,
-0.04312937706708908,
-0.059701889753341675,
-0.08105678111314774,
0.09215279668569565,
0.010380147024989128,
-0.11932701617479324,
-0.028749417513608932,
-0.0019185257842764258,
0.046266812831163406,
0.02272767759859562,
-0.10245968401432037,
-0.02514312043786049,
0.01886291801929474,
0.02174972929060459,
-0.026926832273602486,
-0.004457969218492508,
0.00582363735884428,
-0.0035036506596952677,
-0.00342547707259655,
0.033195775002241135,
-0.0980461984872818,
-0.08039204776287079,
0.05895831435918808,
0.011160949245095253,
-0.06404562294483185,
0.041439205408096313,
0.03375730291008949,
-0.08738219738006592,
0.05797795206308365,
0.00797139573842287,
-0.042067378759384155,
0.03460530564188957,
0.050517912954092026,
0.020492590963840485,
-0.018527135252952576,
-0.016044041141867638,
0.02390616573393345,
0.12121124565601349,
0.06797215342521667,
-0.07599902153015137,
0.03814907744526863,
-0.06377403438091278,
-0.048935189843177795,
0.052712392061948776,
0.06592779606580734,
-0.04727667570114136,
-0.06305912882089615,
-0.00001387988686474273,
0.06220231205224991,
-0.04287470132112503,
0.0429312027990818,
-0.009853752329945564,
-0.005592671222984791,
-0.05752835050225258,
0.002047409303486347,
-0.029339170083403587,
0.024882713332772255,
-0.07232008129358292,
-0.08442048728466034,
0.019853942096233368,
-0.018358856439590454,
-0.010404426604509354,
-0.010469718836247921,
-0.09893513470888138,
0.008253239095211029,
-0.04703270271420479,
0.06655670702457428,
0.05023510381579399,
0.0015026526525616646,
0.01272076927125454,
-0.0042878249660134315,
-0.01673259772360325,
0.02505645714700222,
0.018388086929917336,
-0.07542865723371506,
0.045681390911340714,
0.04508758708834648,
-0.02366165816783905,
0.04694727435708046,
0.018013520166277885,
-0.029512152075767517,
0.04978141933679581,
0.06119369715452194,
-0.05139907822012901,
0.032113268971443176,
0.030233334749937057,
-0.05464203283190727,
1.3709921938399845e-33,
0.0412432886660099,
0.01590488851070404,
-0.03822657838463783,
-0.06075571849942207,
-0.009732075966894627,
0.0007911207503639162,
-0.061890337616205215,
-0.03276965767145157,
-0.02542160078883171,
-0.0012457752600312233,
-0.07818923890590668,
-0.006241222843527794,
0.003060297342017293,
0.06320519000291824,
-0.005318830255419016,
-0.04935380071401596,
-0.04197678714990616,
0.08045137673616409,
0.019580399617552757,
0.042239803820848465,
0.013890577480196953,
-0.005027779843658209,
-0.010929147712886333,
-0.030623294413089752,
-0.04748666658997536,
0.05021955445408821,
-0.007562872022390366,
-0.005336440168321133,
0.042813386768102646,
-0.00375400111079216,
-0.03997072950005531,
0.008138827979564667,
0.09359599649906158,
-0.026450423523783684,
-0.016588697209954262,
-0.0017257818253710866,
0.025195343419909477,
0.029857715591788292,
-0.007338834926486015,
-0.025575008243322372,
0.005465366877615452,
0.0684054046869278,
0.10813859105110168,
0.009161427617073059,
0.02355087175965309,
0.000967752595897764,
0.053072717040777206,
0.011654927395284176,
0.0205589197576046,
0.026250310242176056,
-0.056243300437927246,
0.028739139437675476,
-0.02381362020969391,
-0.010252959094941616,
-0.08785104006528854,
-0.050562161952257156,
-0.08034899830818176,
-0.0260293111205101,
0.05414902791380882,
-0.003974198363721371,
0.09045355767011642,
-0.005856811534613371,
-0.017392225563526154,
0.0043431478552520275,
-0.017673000693321228,
0.037720728665590286,
-0.08332991600036621,
-0.04074609652161598,
0.0010506078833714128,
0.08198174089193344,
0.02018633298575878,
-0.03820187970995903,
0.01905198208987713,
0.010754120536148548,
0.009896042756736279,
0.03791097551584244,
0.046783752739429474,
-0.011531930416822433,
0.0998753011226654,
-0.08822616934776306,
0.07623513787984848,
-0.07715198397636414,
0.024244874715805054,
0.025971779599785805,
-0.02666199393570423,
0.02313876897096634,
0.052280161529779434,
0.061019428074359894,
-0.06444933265447617,
-0.063954658806324,
-0.08052510023117065,
-0.035784173756837845,
-0.005913061555474997,
0.047315310686826706,
0.05063233524560928,
-3.7836007685321446e-33,
-0.02313235029578209,
-0.009910997934639454,
0.0803741067647934,
-0.006023105699568987,
0.05196477100253105,
0.06962984800338745,
-0.05999917536973953,
-0.11371975392103195,
0.08482658863067627,
-0.0280473455786705,
-0.041099537163972855,
0.07647070288658142,
-0.038869813084602356,
0.01927879825234413,
-0.057143066078424454,
-0.05622243881225586,
0.010467949323356152,
-0.05095469579100609,
0.005479664076119661,
-0.020412201061844826,
0.0018589645624160767,
0.08302665501832962,
-0.12278158217668533,
0.09318655729293823,
-0.0338553786277771,
0.06039084121584892,
0.022831523790955544,
-0.0800359770655632,
-0.00305619603022933,
-0.01086275652050972,
-0.07227761298418045,
-0.029147405177354813,
-0.03299129754304886,
0.036348626017570496,
-0.03119364008307457,
-0.015411037020385265,
-0.061392080038785934,
-0.021996375173330307,
-0.08168768137693405,
-0.018478620797395706,
0.08080263435840607,
-0.022282995283603668,
-0.074576236307621,
0.004280874039977789,
0.02251385897397995,
-0.026949135586619377,
-0.06349517405033112,
-0.01345121394842863,
-0.013106774538755417,
0.03972768783569336,
-0.06314545124769211,
-0.03844098001718521,
0.07084924727678299,
0.03972158581018448,
-0.02288726344704628,
-0.008295529522001743,
0.001652728533372283,
-0.06575750559568405,
0.06506792455911636,
0.020615937188267708,
0.02170310728251934,
0.038302965462207794,
-0.08517889678478241,
-0.04973269999027252,
0.0191337950527668,
-0.010238176211714745,
0.03954337537288666,
-0.07369206845760345,
0.06899577379226685,
0.00940555240958929,
0.07093153893947601,
-0.09590371698141098,
-0.037314899265766144,
-0.05997737497091293,
0.08820969611406326,
0.07102042436599731,
-0.01488981582224369,
0.056736432015895844,
-0.11351394653320312,
-0.0032229835633188486,
0.11485109478235245,
-0.06913547217845917,
0.00024142565962392837,
-0.014109653420746326,
-0.086717888712883,
0.01802000403404236,
0.04732239618897438,
-0.029392782598733902,
-0.013027583248913288,
0.07346194982528687,
-0.05815593898296356,
-0.02428901195526123,
-0.06974366307258606,
0.021338166669011116,
-0.08189916610717773,
-5.4616798195183947e-8,
0.08432574570178986,
0.03318905830383301,
-0.043405160307884216,
0.07306396961212158,
0.009525501169264317,
-0.02579197660088539,
-0.057104311883449554,
-0.02177439257502556,
-0.04905574023723602,
0.02749655582010746,
0.1452990472316742,
0.08288063853979111,
-0.02636941336095333,
-0.0021749690640717745,
-0.00868210755288601,
0.08076731860637665,
-0.09895395487546921,
0.09453574568033218,
-0.015161879360675812,
0.06712646782398224,
-0.07885230332612991,
-0.012633219361305237,
-0.05903336778283119,
0.0014872461324557662,
0.038373690098524094,
0.06376229226589203,
0.008579056710004807,
0.1281575709581375,
0.043568696826696396,
0.05570757016539574,
-0.019610535353422165,
-0.030237272381782532,
-0.0064718774519860744,
0.046969301998615265,
-0.09343695640563965,
-0.11753103882074356,
-0.06589274108409882,
0.011138919740915298,
0.03998478502035141,
-0.023045742884278297,
0.025321628898382187,
-0.029294632375240326,
0.012648881413042545,
0.007084686309099197,
0.04589998349547386,
-0.033941153436899185,
-0.06570328027009964,
0.000025498673494439572,
0.0026189193595200777,
-0.015865687280893326,
0.00532000744715333,
0.051736317574977875,
0.04308713972568512,
-0.055637989193201065,
0.00958776194602251,
0.009667614474892616,
-0.015449659898877144,
-0.0937369242310524,
-0.11651010066270828,
-0.09982090443372726,
0.0678369477391243,
-0.02408743090927601,
0.012238425202667713,
0.030392220243811607
] | {
"pdf_file": "6X7DGVAM2PXFTZ3B6YQOHRCZ3VVBS5LO.pdf",
"text": "Tomorrow Marks the Beginning of the Bush Prescription Drug Tax \nOn Monday, I hosted a town hall meeting in Waldorf to discuss the looming prescription drug\ndeadline. My Democratic colleagues and I have requested that the Bush Administration extend\nthe penalty-free enrollment deadline for the new Medicare prescription drug law from tomorrow\nto January 1, 2007, so that seniors can have more time to navigate this confusing and\ncomplicated law. \n \nFor many seniors and people with disabilities, prescription drugs are essential to their health\nand well-being. Unfortunately, Republicans have created a program that is impossible to\nunderstand. Now, the Bush Administration wants to penalize seniors for not being able to\ncomprehend their own confusing program. With the deadline upon us, it is unfair that seniors\nwho are unable to navigate through the 47 different plans offered by 19 different companies are\ngiven a lifetime penalty. \n \nAnd no wonder seniors are confused. The Government Accountability Office recently issued a\nreport finding that information provided by the federal government was beyond the\ncomprehension of most seniors, and answers given were inaccurate one-third of the time. In\nresponse to the critical question of which plan offered the lowest cost for a given list of drugs,\nMedicare hotline operators failed to provide the correct answer 60% of the time. \n \nFurthermore, the Kaiser Family Foundation found that only 55% of seniors know about the May\n15 deadline. The rest either did not know there was a deadline, or had incorrect information\nabout it. \n \nExtending the deadline for enrollment will ensure that more than 200,000 seniors and people\nwith disabilities in Maryland are not forced to pay the Bush prescription drug tax and higher\npremiums for life. \nWith the deadline looming, about 5.7 million seniors and people with disabilities eligible for the\ndrug program have not signed up. Government officials and outside advocates say the\nresponse has been lowest among those who stand to reap the greatest benefit from the\nprogram: the one-third of senior citizens who are low-income. \n \nFamilies USA, an advocacy group, estimates that fewer than one in four low-income senior\ncitizens have enrolled, despite expensive government outreach to educate people. Extending\nthe deadline would allow this benefit to reach some of the seniors overlooked during the\nPresident’s public relations frenzy. \n 1 / 2 Tomorrow Marks the Beginning of the Bush Prescription Drug Tax \n \nIn fact, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that 1 million more beneficiaries\nwould choose to enroll this year if the deadline is extended. \"We estimate that about 1 million of\nthose beneficiaries [who have not enrolled yet] would enroll in Part D in 2006 (i.e. sooner than\nthey would have otherwise) if the initial enrollment period were extended through the end of this\ncalendar year,\" its findings read. \n \nLet me be clear. Democrats wanted a different law. We wanted to simply add a prescription\ndrug benefit to the existing Medicare program. And we wanted it run exactly like the Medicare\nPart B seniors already knew: in which they pay 20 percent and Medicare pays 80 percent. \n \nI opposed this badly flawed prescription drug plan because it was confusing and illogical, and\ndid not do enough to make medicines more affordable for Medicare recipients. For example,\nthe law outrageously prohibits the Secretary of Health and Human Services from negotiating\nlower drug prices on behalf of the 40 million seniors enrolled in Medicare, even though similar\ntypes of negotiations currently in practice at the Veterans Administration (VA) saves them over\n40% on many medicines. \n \nIn turn, the Republican plan has been a confusing and frustrating experience for many—and I\nwill do everything in my power to help seniors from the 5th Congressional district avoid a\nlifetime penalty. \nBecause this prescription drug plan is the law of the land, I encourage seniors to examine all of\ntheir options in the remaining hours. For individualized assistance, I urge seniors to contact\nrepresentatives at the State Health Insurance Assistance Program (301-475-4200 x 1050 in St.\nMary’s). \n 2 / 2"
} |
[
0.0014195514377206564,
-0.008771615102887154,
-0.05402439087629318,
0.000665589643176645,
-0.018016602843999863,
-0.01904391683638096,
-0.012490696273744106,
-0.04856867715716362,
-0.041015952825546265,
-0.011552035808563232,
0.0716799944639206,
-0.10988562554121017,
0.01390397734940052,
-0.05440433323383331,
-0.09910015016794205,
0.00017694370762910694,
0.05162685364484787,
0.009693276137113571,
-0.0017580717103555799,
-0.049073852598667145,
0.0732654258608818,
0.10841600596904755,
0.04049614444375038,
0.0005815936019644141,
0.06065075844526291,
0.058439429849386215,
-0.0858134850859642,
0.0006778805400244892,
-0.031200742349028587,
-0.010244428180158138,
-0.019410569220781326,
0.07995366305112839,
0.02667665109038353,
-0.013756126165390015,
0.053028207272291183,
0.002521413378417492,
0.02494129166007042,
-0.000808333046734333,
0.017358440905809402,
0.016479894518852234,
-0.011657302267849445,
-0.12065733224153519,
0.046614669263362885,
-0.020891282707452774,
0.01209923718124628,
0.048026591539382935,
-0.041744448244571686,
0.0327521488070488,
0.05197610706090927,
0.02477411925792694,
0.021510666236281395,
0.06179420277476311,
-0.07290295511484146,
0.05005143582820892,
0.04289443790912628,
-0.020989973098039627,
-0.02084461972117424,
0.026423834264278412,
-0.07537856698036194,
0.126913920044899,
-0.039062660187482834,
0.022353114560246468,
-0.012895225547254086,
0.00636808667331934,
0.07568177580833435,
0.04869306460022926,
-0.0957191064953804,
-0.08533886075019836,
-0.08816704899072647,
-0.0734238550066948,
0.030523786321282387,
-0.07042021304368973,
-0.005508700385689735,
0.009104514494538307,
-0.09554242342710495,
-0.014411196112632751,
0.03895909711718559,
0.09696400910615921,
0.10387838631868362,
-0.09280115365982056,
0.020077187567949295,
0.04236021637916565,
0.05358849838376045,
-0.058710694313049316,
-0.03488070145249367,
-0.04051735997200012,
-0.01925889402627945,
0.021450020372867584,
0.0713462308049202,
-0.03832633048295975,
0.025478173047304153,
-0.048285745084285736,
0.016535336151719093,
0.04208797216415405,
-0.01239639613777399,
-0.020814286544919014,
-0.027249131351709366,
-0.08001907169818878,
-0.0783415213227272,
0.0011955834925174713,
0.008578424341976643,
-0.026288997381925583,
0.0047168005257844925,
-0.040206778794527054,
-0.10205711424350739,
0.002878730883821845,
-0.050872694700956345,
0.06181260943412781,
-0.036860816180706024,
0.08163189888000488,
-0.010101109743118286,
0.1017320305109024,
-0.0869266465306282,
0.04618832841515541,
-0.02361944317817688,
0.0003304258862044662,
0.041729338467121124,
-0.12280620634555817,
0.06835328042507172,
-0.048770662397146225,
0.014939654618501663,
0.0007526068366132677,
-0.04339670017361641,
0.04522588104009628,
0.08729549497365952,
-0.027461038902401924,
-0.027847832068800926,
-2.1624148693281067e-32,
-0.1122092604637146,
-0.038936544209718704,
0.04400530830025673,
-0.010712657123804092,
-0.08847107738256454,
-0.03940114006400108,
-0.028608832508325577,
-0.03895635902881622,
0.040483348071575165,
-0.05809616297483444,
0.0184676144272089,
0.029796376824378967,
0.006105576176196337,
0.06942599266767502,
0.033485934138298035,
-0.06851714849472046,
-0.0037191968876868486,
0.025453023612499237,
0.006208475213497877,
-0.00484112836420536,
-0.08323885500431061,
0.017693186178803444,
-0.039245475083589554,
0.05120415240526199,
-0.014972295612096786,
-0.06170567870140076,
-0.05613616853952408,
-0.02718305215239525,
-0.05260118097066879,
-0.012073765508830547,
0.15868966281414032,
0.012686315923929214,
0.0148967569693923,
-0.060678184032440186,
-0.06788138300180435,
-0.04500211030244827,
0.06268321722745895,
-0.024716053158044815,
-0.06144773215055466,
0.05691143870353699,
-0.07525254040956497,
0.05948040634393692,
0.10411878675222397,
0.028566874563694,
-0.0035386120434850454,
0.06418114900588989,
0.045730799436569214,
0.08469238132238388,
0.02124899812042713,
-0.029757214710116386,
-0.004608756396919489,
0.0070714508183300495,
0.006331311538815498,
-0.04935837164521217,
0.020766809582710266,
0.029796646907925606,
-0.0015084268525242805,
-0.019228966906666756,
-0.037838347256183624,
0.0544564351439476,
-0.04491017013788223,
0.02987757883965969,
-0.005491350777447224,
-0.06224312633275986,
-0.05429057776927948,
-0.03987295180559158,
0.04343811050057411,
0.03855758160352707,
-0.005135806277394295,
0.09556368738412857,
-0.006561793386936188,
-0.0035864112433046103,
0.0472874753177166,
0.0805906280875206,
-0.011889631859958172,
-0.00004383091800264083,
0.08826729655265808,
0.042538125067949295,
-0.004452081397175789,
-0.006910223513841629,
0.06362657994031906,
-0.046817757189273834,
-0.0028878303710371256,
-0.047880273312330246,
-0.01619044691324234,
0.018193552270531654,
-0.07727675139904022,
-0.05382264778017998,
0.0068256305530667305,
-0.0640721544623375,
0.008396743796765804,
0.04200258478522301,
-0.049237798899412155,
-0.027173779904842377,
-0.001427481765858829,
1.3620589694196128e-32,
0.003985598683357239,
0.09984442591667175,
-0.08325529098510742,
0.06010092794895172,
0.022625815123319626,
-0.0375019796192646,
0.05626858025789261,
-0.04844557121396065,
0.0773533508181572,
-0.032387785613536835,
-0.0011259965831413865,
0.09057249873876572,
-0.015107651241123676,
-0.05509611591696739,
0.024491647258400917,
-0.03202522173523903,
-0.06827762722969055,
0.031922996044158936,
0.008061281405389309,
-0.007279459852725267,
-0.08422378450632095,
0.07602963596582413,
-0.05953481048345566,
-0.04030041769146919,
-0.049356378614902496,
0.030026383697986603,
-0.1113453358411789,
0.03320808336138725,
-0.041904937475919724,
-0.09417909383773804,
0.018977802246809006,
-0.1899099051952362,
-0.014099905267357826,
-0.03733057528734207,
-0.02083076909184456,
-0.06098360940814018,
0.041289474815130234,
-0.06172860041260719,
-0.02430765889585018,
-0.027345795184373856,
0.029114702716469765,
0.04925478622317314,
-0.01861223392188549,
0.0295361690223217,
-0.05072854086756706,
-0.0036078107077628374,
0.03770574927330017,
-0.004110123496502638,
0.0768316388130188,
0.06372079253196716,
0.023996153846383095,
0.027628717944025993,
-0.06406610459089279,
-0.027071330696344376,
-0.046588316559791565,
-0.0021747639402747154,
0.05402173846960068,
0.03740749508142471,
-0.08720391988754272,
-0.0004953735624440014,
0.006335079669952393,
0.08034869283437729,
-0.012224254198372364,
0.009679815731942654,
-0.01712394319474697,
-0.05965458229184151,
-0.07284372299909592,
-0.08363787829875946,
0.0014200391015037894,
0.09450201690196991,
-0.04345403611660004,
-0.0454123429954052,
0.038581687957048416,
-0.05045800656080246,
-0.03332237899303436,
0.045157067477703094,
0.052395064383745193,
-0.019610416144132614,
-0.025339704006910324,
0.002137277042493224,
-0.04853728786110878,
-0.03820621967315674,
0.04956463724374771,
0.037404097616672516,
0.030734144151210785,
0.024102389812469482,
0.007924694567918777,
0.011340847238898277,
0.044501807540655136,
0.08809023350477219,
-0.031306054443120956,
-0.0280953086912632,
-0.012859922833740711,
0.01890890672802925,
0.014993181452155113,
-4.538537368148354e-8,
0.053027864545583725,
0.05046019330620766,
-0.0780227929353714,
-0.020716877654194832,
0.10585563629865646,
0.00624982500448823,
0.026323802769184113,
-0.0009956315625458956,
0.008012396283447742,
0.05717169865965843,
0.012700129300355911,
0.087798573076725,
-0.07682737708091736,
0.00576223898679018,
-0.044871095567941666,
0.008845224976539612,
-0.03650091588497162,
0.014429020695388317,
-0.020910941064357758,
-0.027556413784623146,
0.028354503214359283,
0.030615950003266335,
-0.08502677828073502,
-0.004483642987906933,
-0.002224559662863612,
-0.02127181924879551,
0.0023240766022354364,
0.040371328592300415,
0.06281499564647675,
0.07420652359724045,
0.04110584780573845,
0.005993565544486046,
0.015107582323253155,
-0.055951058864593506,
0.016294801607728004,
0.0090390145778656,
-0.06678660213947296,
0.059417735785245895,
0.04232926294207573,
0.018109744414687157,
-0.03254621475934982,
-0.08048108965158463,
0.045583900064229965,
0.004475786816328764,
0.009878250770270824,
0.06118513643741608,
-0.0978989526629448,
0.008226318284869194,
0.04637545347213745,
-0.033752597868442535,
-0.007514112628996372,
-0.03407423198223114,
-0.05349930375814438,
0.0241631418466568,
0.0889662578701973,
0.009865416213870049,
-0.00635820347815752,
-0.09402979165315628,
0.14247313141822815,
-0.018872693181037903,
0.03514772653579712,
-0.025904420763254166,
0.022629806771874428,
0.039318427443504333
] | {
"pdf_file": "YI6VCV5U4XK43LKHIXM2ZFEE3CMZSUVY.pdf",
"text": " \n2012 Census of Agriculture - State Data Nebraska 27 \nUSDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service Table 37. Specified Crops by Acres Harvested: 2012 and 2007 \n [Totals may not add due to rounding. For meaning of abbreviations and symbols, see introductory text.] \nCrop 2012 2007 \nFarms Acres Quantity Irrigated land Farms Acres Quantity Irrigated land \nFarms Acres Farms Acres \nFIELD CROPS \n \nBarley for grain (bushels) ................................ ..................... \n \nCanola (pounds) ................................ ................................ ... \n \nCorn for grain (bushels) ................................ ........................ \n 1 to 14 acres ................................ ................................ .... \n 15 to 24 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 25 to 49 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 50 to 99 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 100 to 249 acres ................................ .............................. \n 250 to 499 acres ................................ .............................. \n 500 to 999 acres ................................ .............................. \n 1,000 acres or more ................................ ......................... \n 1,000 to 1,999 acres ................................ ..................... \n 2,000 to 2,999 acres ................................ ..................... \n 3,000 to 4,999 acres ................................ ..................... \n 5,000 acres or more ................................ ..................... \n \nCorn for silage or greenchop (tons) ................................ ...... \n 1 to 14 acres ................................ ................................ .... \n 15 to 24 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 25 to 49 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 50 to 99 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 100 to 249 acres ................................ .............................. \n 250 to 499 acres ................................ .............................. \n 500 to 999 acres ................................ .............................. \n 1,000 acres or more ................................ ......................... \n \nDry edible beans, excluding limas (cwt) ............................... \n 1 to 14 acres ................................ ................................ .... \n 15 to 24 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 25 to 49 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 50 to 99 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 100 to 249 acres ................................ .............................. \n 250 to 499 acres ................................ .............................. \n 500 to 999 acres ................................ .............................. \n 1,000 to 1,999 acres ................................ ......................... \n 2,000 acres or more ................................ ......................... \n \nDry edible peas (cwt) ................................ ........................... \n \nHops (pounds) ................................ ................................ ...... \n \nOats for grain (bushels) ................................ ........................ \n 1 to 14 acres ................................ ................................ .... \n 15 to 24 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 25 to 49 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 50 to 99 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 100 to 249 acres ................................ .............................. \n 250 to 499 acres ................................ .............................. \n 500 to 999 acres ................................ .............................. \n 1,000 acres or more ................................ ......................... \n \nPopcorn (pounds, shelled) ................................ ................... \n 1 to 14 acres ................................ ................................ .... \n 15 to 24 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 25 to 49 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 50 to 99 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 100 to 249 acres ................................ .............................. \n 250 to 499 acres ................................ .............................. \n 500 to 999 acres ................................ .............................. \n 1,000 acres or more ................................ ......................... \n \nProso millet (bushels) ................................ ........................... \n 1 to 14 acres ................................ ................................ .... \n 15 to 24 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 25 to 49 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 50 to 99 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 100 to 249 acres ................................ .............................. \n 250 to 499 acres ................................ .............................. \n 500 to 999 acres ................................ .............................. \n 1,000 acres or more ................................ ......................... \n \nRye for grain (bushels) ................................ ......................... \n \nSafflower (pounds) ................................ ............................... \n \nSorghum for grain (bushels) ................................ ................. \n 1 to 14 acres ................................ ................................ .... \n 15 to 24 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 25 to 49 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 50 to 99 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 100 to 249 acres ................................ .............................. \n 250 to 499 acres ................................ .............................. \n 500 to 999 acres ................................ .............................. \n 1,000 acres or more ................................ ......................... \n \nSorghum for silage or greenchop (tons) ............................... \n 1 to 14 acres ................................ ................................ .... \n 15 to 24 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 25 to 49 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 50 to 99 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 100 to 249 acres ................................ .............................. \n 250 to 499 acres ................................ .............................. \n 500 to 999 acres ................................ .............................. \n 1,000 acr es or more ................................ ......................... \n \nSoybeans for beans (bushels) ................................ .............. \n 1 to 14 acres ................................ ................................ .... \n \n26 \n \n3 \n \n22,977 \n665 \n626 \n1,570 \n3,247 \n6,061 \n5,157 \n3,544 \n2,107 \n1,657 \n307 \n103 \n40 \n \n4,232 \n379 \n492 \n967 \n1,064 \n955 \n271 \n74 \n30 \n \n578 \n7 \n26 \n70 \n86 \n213 \n106 \n57 \n13 \n- \n \n43 \n \n6 \n \n476 \n146 \n109 \n113 \n71 \n33 \n4 \n- \n- \n \n242 \n5 \n1 \n11 \n26 \n95 \n71 \n20 \n13 \n \n179 \n6 \n- \n10 \n33 \n52 \n43 \n26 \n9 \n \n140 \n \n22 \n \n633 \n78 \n69 \n144 \n165 \n128 \n33 \n15 \n1 \n \n240 \n60 \n51 \n56 \n43 \n23 \n7 \n- \n- \n \n18,539 \n547 \n \n1,731 \n \n90 \n \n9,087,851 \n5,487 \n12,088 \n56,945 \n232,483 \n985,654 \n1,824,242 \n2,414,027 \n3,556,925 \n2,190,146 \n716,678 \n366,727 \n283,374 \n \n446,386 \n3,424 \n9,347 \n34,093 \n72,041 \n139,231 \n89,367 \n48,917 \n49,966 \n \n132,697 \n42 \n499 \n2,511 \n5,957 \n33,463 \n35,087 \n37,715 \n17,423 \n- \n \n6,644 \n \n6 \n \n17,788 \n1,126 \n2,051 \n3,877 \n4,646 \n4,700 \n1,388 \n- \n- \n \n70,879 \n34 \n(D) \n(D) \n1,884 \n14,012 \n22,712 \n14,003 \n17,777 \n \n54,895 \n33 \n- \n(D) \n2,349 \n8,071 \n15,017 \n16,766 \n(D) \n \n6,837 \n \n2,992 \n \n60,010 \n(D) \n1,325 \n5,035 \n11,431 \n19,386 \n11,172 \n8,843 \n(D) \n \n11,677 \n499 \n981 \n1,887 \n2,842 \n3,250 \n2,218 \n- \n- \n \n4,983,253 \n4,493 \n \n59,684 \n \n15,000 \n \n1,188,509,521 \n398,281 \n953,416 \n5,055,885 \n23,760,705 \n106,046,656 \n213,970,605 \n320,770,365 \n517,553,608 \n315,297,423 \n105,008,943 \n53,757,359 \n43,489,883 \n \n4,605,604 \n33,136 \n90,407 \n332,344 \n700,987 \n1,336,971 \n861,309 \n601,668 \n648,782 \n \n3,050,199 \n1,298 \n15,129 \n51,950 \n135,753 \n737,294 \n773,508 \n884,290 \n450,977 \n- \n \n74,669 \n \n900 \n \n905,529 \n63,353 \n94,258 \n201,535 \n230,122 \n246,032 \n70,229 \n- \n- \n \n353,711,118 \n(D) \n(D) \n1,829,253 \n8,395,840 \n65,242,282 \n117,763,317 \n69,231,805 \n91,093,795 \n \n795,466 \n411 \n- \n(D) \n29,788 \n100,414 \n159,122 \n259,361 \n(D) \n \n170,777 \n \n1,859,202 \n \n3,622,070 \n(D) \n(D) \n347,102 \n688,290 \n1,226,661 \n590,337 \n493,458 \n(D) \n \n109,704 \n3,859 \n9,163 \n24,357 \n33,261 \n19,227 \n19,837 \n- \n- \n \n193,014,515 \n118,508 \n \n10 \n \n- \n \n13,799 \n149 \n153 \n520 \n1,427 \n3,378 \n3,443 \n2,805 \n1,924 \n1,484 \n299 \n101 \n40 \n \n1,223 \n118 \n141 \n221 \n298 \n293 \n102 \n39 \n11 \n \n560 \n5 \n24 \n64 \n85 \n206 \n106 \n57 \n13 \n- \n \n5 \n \n- \n \n39 \n4 \n9 \n4 \n13 \n8 \n1 \n- \n- \n \n229 \n5 \n1 \n9 \n26 \n91 \n64 \n20 \n13 \n \n22 \n- \n- \n- \n6 \n10 \n3 \n3 \n- \n \n26 \n \n2 \n \n111 \n21 \n7 \n19 \n36 \n12 \n8 \n7 \n1 \n \n59 \n4 \n7 \n14 \n21 \n7 \n6 \n- \n- \n \n9,384 \n64 \n \n606 \n \n- \n \n5,287,913 \n1,214 \n2,738 \n17,269 \n91,824 \n445,862 \n895,746 \n1,416,183 \n2,417,077 \n1,451,512 \n501,491 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n117,057 \n1,010 \n2,289 \n6,167 \n16,751 \n30,543 \n22,428 \n17,256 \n20,613 \n \n127,509 \n(D) \n(D) \n2,296 \n(D) \n32,198 \n34,097 \n36,750 \n15,778 \n- \n \n506 \n \n- \n \n1,569 \n(D) \n82 \n14 \n793 \n627 \n(D) \n- \n- \n \n66,609 \n31 \n(D) \n(D) \n1,796 \n13,289 \n20,231 \n13,864 \n17,031 \n \n2,430 \n- \n- \n- \n346 \n876 \n(D) \n(D) \n- \n \n1,843 \n \n(D) \n \n8,710 \n191 \n103 \n(D) \n1,397 \n1,312 \n1,454 \n1,630 \n(D) \n \n3,744 \n(D) \n98 \n448 \n1,195 \n792 \n(D) \n- \n- \n \n2,075,317 \n568 \n \n35 \n \n4 \n \n22,812 \n512 \n549 \n1,600 \n3,145 \n6,036 \n5,046 \n3,813 \n2,111 \n1,634 \n360 \n96 \n21 \n \n2,671 \n374 \n475 \n742 \n586 \n393 \n73 \n22 \n6 \n \n495 \n11 \n15 \n40 \n87 \n196 \n95 \n41 \n10 \n- \n \n6 \n \n- \n \n885 \n261 \n172 \n243 \n133 \n66 \n10 \n- \n- \n \n253 \n8 \n4 \n18 \n37 \n105 \n58 \n16 \n7 \n \n429 \n3 \n3 \n31 \n67 \n144 \n102 \n66 \n13 \n \n290 \n \n4 \n \n1,901 \n102 \n128 \n388 \n520 \n528 \n180 \n45 \n10 \n \n444 \n104 \n84 \n106 \n100 \n44 \n6 \n- \n- \n \n16,620 \n412 \n \n1,777 \n \n95 \n \n9,192,656 \n4,060 \n10,653 \n58,228 \n224,671 \n988,286 \n1,783,776 \n2,607,977 \n3,515,005 \n2,168,013 \n853,564 \n356,464 \n136,964 \n \n185,584 \n3,578 \n8,837 \n25,308 \n38,100 \n56,271 \n24,694 \n15,201 \n13,595 \n \n107,583 \n93 \n287 \n1,482 \n5,979 \n30,238 \n30,515 \n26,356 \n12,633 \n- \n \n177 \n \n- \n \n35,108 \n2,226 \n3,212 \n8,086 \n8,886 \n9,167 \n3,531 \n- \n- \n \n59,728 \n(D) \n(D) \n711 \n2,691 \n16,302 \n19,064 \n10,693 \n10,136 \n \n129,891 \n7 \n66 \n1,159 \n4,674 \n22,506 \n36,186 \n44,761 \n20,532 \n \n15,354 \n \n206 \n \n236,607 \n942 \n2,421 \n13,959 \n36,642 \n80,180 \n59,836 \n30,301 \n12,326 \n \n20,376 \n932 \n1,591 \n3,580 \n6,346 \n5,807 \n2,120 \n- \n- \n \n3,834,855 \n3,541 \n \n81,963 \n \n186,250 \n \n1,426,459,812 \n452,921 \n1,188,930 \n6,845,980 \n28,804,362 \n136,427,165 \n265,482,299 \n409,997,154 \n577,261,001 \n352,764,183 \n139,635,324 \n61,615,041 \n23,246,453 \n \n3,171,470 \n50,073 \n127,671 \n394,089 \n623,273 \n994,294 \n450,740 \n270,155 \n261,175 \n \n2,453,158 \n2,029 \n5,089 \n31,750 \n134,822 \n685,512 \n707,444 \n581,056 \n305,456 \n- \n \n2,913 \n \n- \n \n2,108,923 \n132,843 \n191,955 \n486,546 \n500,862 \n599,109 \n197,608 \n- \n- \n \n294,541,958 \n(D) \n(D) \n3,489,681 \n10,645,778 \n77,035,512 \n94,737,828 \n57,798,328 \n50,318,012 \n \n4,253,359 \n109 \n1,042 \n46,627 \n155,772 \n722,794 \n1,099,472 \n1,502,828 \n724,715 \n \n443,793 \n \n254,840 \n \n22,177,229 \n68,696 \n197,760 \n1,179,079 \n3,278,453 \n7,460,965 \n5,594,084 \n3,211,052 \n1,187,140 \n \n235,551 \n10,708 \n18,461 \n44,187 \n72,869 \n66,603 \n22,723 \n- \n- \n \n189,547,373 \n144,809 \n \n10 \n \n1 \n \n14,107 \n101 \n132 \n416 \n1,249 \n3,319 \n3,644 \n3,259 \n1,987 \n1,527 \n344 \n95 \n21 \n \n1,295 \n146 \n184 \n334 \n308 \n245 \n54 \n18 \n6 \n \n482 \n11 \n15 \n40 \n82 \n189 \n94 \n41 \n10 \n- \n \n- \n \n- \n \n67 \n9 \n13 \n11 \n21 \n11 \n2 \n- \n- \n \n232 \n2 \n3 \n10 \n31 \n105 \n58 \n16 \n7 \n \n60 \n1 \n- \n10 \n16 \n17 \n9 \n6 \n1 \n \n41 \n \n- \n \n299 \n14 \n24 \n60 \n70 \n71 \n45 \n12 \n3 \n \n100 \n9 \n14 \n19 \n37 \n17 \n4 \n- \n- \n \n8,088 \n55 \n \n526 \n \n(D) \n \n5,839,067 \n765 \n2,446 \n14,044 \n80,201 \n444,561 \n981,442 \n1,710,834 \n2,604,774 \n1,563,125 \n663,517 \n271,475 \n106,657 \n \n101,256 \n1,334 \n3,125 \n10,389 \n18,199 \n30,527 \n15,620 \n10,276 \n11,786 \n \n104,748 \n93 \n279 \n1,477 \n5,593 \n29,238 \n30,065 \n25,370 \n12,633 \n- \n \n- \n \n- \n \n3,052 \n(D) \n150 \n343 \n1,032 \n1,278 \n(D) \n- \n- \n \n57,095 \n(D) \n60 \n(D) \n2,134 \n15,643 \n18,452 \n10,575 \n9,833 \n \n5,930 \n(D) \n- \n(D) \n747 \n2,215 \n638 \n1,716 \n(D) \n \n1,952 \n \n- \n \n19,445 \n99 \n352 \n1,326 \n3,371 \n5,910 \n7,051 \n1,261 \n75 \n \n6,300 \n60 \n233 \n544 \n2,074 \n2,072 \n1,317 \n- \n- \n \n1,570,110 \n445 \n --continued \n28 Nebraska 2012 Census of Agriculture - State Data USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service Table 37. Specified Crops by Acres Harvested: 2012 and 2007 (continued) \n [Totals may not add due to rounding. For meaning of abbreviations and symbols, see introductory text.] \nCrop 2012 2007 \nFarms Acres Quantity Irrigated land Farms Acres Quantity Irrigated land \nFarms Acres Farms Acres \nFIELD CROPS - Con. \n \nSoybeans for beans (bushels) - Con. \n \n 15 to 24 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 25 to 49 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 50 to 99 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 100 to 249 acres ................................ .............................. \n 250 to 499 acres ................................ .............................. \n 500 to 999 acres ................................ .............................. \n 1,000 acres or more ................................ ......................... \n 1,000 to 1,999 acres ................................ .................... \n 2,000 to 2,999 acres ................................ .................... \n 3,000 to 4,999 acres ................................ .................... \n 5,000 acres or more ................................ ..................... \n \nSugarbeets for sugar (tons) ................................ ................. \n 1 to 14 acres ................................ ................................ .... \n 15 to 24 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 25 to 49 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 50 to 99 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 100 to 249 acre s ................................ .............................. \n 250 to 499 acres ................................ .............................. \n 500 to 999 acres ................................ .............................. \n 1,000 to 1,999 acres ................................ ........................ \n 2,000 acres or more ................................ ......................... \n \nSunflower seed, all (pounds) ................................ ............... \n 1 to 14 acres ................................ ................................ .... \n 15 to 24 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 25 to 49 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 50 to 99 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 100 to 249 acres ................................ .............................. \n 250 to 499 acres ................................ .............................. \n 500 to 999 acres ................................ .............................. \n 1,000 acres or more ................................ ......................... \n \n Sunflower seed - oil varieties (pounds) ............................ \n 1 to 14 acres ................................ ................................ \n 15 to 24 acres ................................ .............................. \n 25 to 49 acres ................................ .............................. \n 50 to 99 acres ................................ .............................. \n 100 to 249 acres ................................ .......................... \n 250 to 499 acres ................................ .......................... \n 500 to 999 acres ................................ .......................... \n 1,000 acres or more ................................ ..................... \n \n Sunflower seed - non-oil varieties (pounds) ..................... \n \nWheat for grain, all (bushels) ................................ ............... \n 1 to 14 acres ................................ ................................ .... \n 15 to 24 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 25 to 49 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 50 to 99 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 100 to 249 acres ................................ .............................. \n 250 to 499 acres ................................ .............................. \n 500 to 999 acres ................................ .............................. \n 1,000 acres or more ................................ ......................... \n 1,000 to 1,999 acres ................................ .................... \n 2,000 to 2,999 acres ................................ .................... \n 3,000 to 4,999 acres ................................ .................... \n 5,000 acres or more ................................ ..................... \n \n Winter wheat for grain (bushels) ................................ ...... \n 1 to 14 acres ................................ ................................ \n 15 to 24 acres ................................ .............................. \n 25 to 49 acres ................................ .............................. \n 50 to 99 acres ................................ .............................. \n 100 to 249 acres ................................ .......................... \n 250 to 499 acres ................................ .......................... \n 500 to 999 acres ................................ .......................... \n 1,000 acres or more ................................ ..................... \n 1,000 to 1,999 acres ................................ ................ \n 2,000 to 2,999 acres ................................ ................ \n 3,000 to 4,999 acres ................................ ................ \n 5,000 acres or more ................................ ................. \n \n Other Spring wheat for grain (bushels) ............................ \n \nHAY, FORAGE, AND FIELD AND GRASS SEEDS \n \nField and grass seed crops, all ................................ ............ \n \n Alfalfa seed (pounds) ................................ ....................... \n \n Ryegrass seed (pounds) ................................ .................. \n \nForage - land used for all hay and all \n haylage, grass silage, and greenchop (tons, \n dry equivalent) (see text) ................................ ................... \n 1 to 14 acres ................................ ................................ .... \n 15 to 24 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 25 to 49 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 50 to 99 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 100 to 249 acres ................................ .............................. \n 250 to 499 acres ................................ .............................. \n 500 to 999 acres ................................ .............................. \n 1,000 acres or more ................................ ......................... \n 1,000 to 1,999 acres ................................ .................... \n 2,000 to 2,999 acres ................................ .................... \n \n \n \n538 \n1,615 \n3,004 \n5,810 \n4,293 \n2,113 \n619 \n572 \n31 \n12 \n4 \n \n172 \n- \n3 \n16 \n20 \n63 \n38 \n23 \n8 \n1 \n \n144 \n6 \n5 \n6 \n37 \n45 \n26 \n10 \n9 \n \n121 \n6 \n5 \n5 \n31 \n39 \n23 \n5 \n7 \n \n34 \n \n5,013 \n230 \n326 \n715 \n937 \n1,306 \n741 \n505 \n253 \n203 \n29 \n20 \n1 \n \n4,951 \n218 \n322 \n701 \n923 \n1,293 \n740 \n502 \n252 \n202 \n29 \n20 \n1 \n \n78 \n \n \n \n33 \n \n3 \n \n3 \n \n \n \n20,034 \n3,671 \n2,721 \n4,109 \n3,794 \n3,513 \n1,205 \n668 \n353 \n245 \n72 \n \n \n \n10,492 \n58,574 \n214,215 \n946,819 \n1,493,884 \n1,387,817 \n866,959 \n722,894 \n75,178 \n43,749 \n25,138 \n \n51,671 \n- \n60 \n(D) \n1,490 \n8,771 \n13,286 \n14,678 \n10,064 \n(D) \n \n39,115 \n40 \n100 \n205 \n2,601 \n7,604 \n8,759 \n6,056 \n13,750 \n \n30,073 \n40 \n100 \n(D) \n2,158 \n6,684 \n7,345 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n9,042 \n \n1,309,269 \n2,096 \n6,278 \n25,062 \n66,859 \n204,898 \n254,881 \n343,350 \n405,845 \n263,147 \n(D) \n70,010 \n(D) \n \n1,302,674 \n1,965 \n6,204 \n24,591 \n65,970 \n202,984 \n254,829 \n341,441 \n404,690 \n261,992 \n(D) \n70,010 \n(D) \n \n6,595 \n \n \n \n3,905 \n \n127 \n \n156 \n \n \n \n2,487,312 \n30,253 \n51,222 \n144,105 \n260,549 \n529,455 \n414,125 \n436,538 \n621,065 \n306,113 \n155,840 \n \n \n \n302,153 \n1,651,242 \n7,292,327 \n34,925,170 \n57,691,399 \n56,966,820 \n34,066,896 \n28,358,312 \n2,902,548 \n1,697,204 \n1,108,832 \n \n1,449,966 \n- \n1,926 \n(D) \n40,566 \n223,283 \n367,624 \n418,817 \n300,757 \n(D) \n \n27,474,025 \n16,000 \n40,000 \n266,112 \n2,240,048 \n6,294,234 \n5,701,097 \n3,242,617 \n9,673,917 \n \n21,579,622 \n16,000 \n40,000 \n(D) \n1,740,546 \n4,805,256 \n5,037,258 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n5,894,403 \n \n51,650,730 \n82,345 \n238,117 \n1,022,846 \n2,844,852 \n8,470,799 \n10,394,631 \n13,432,430 \n15,164,710 \n9,940,517 \n2,820,856 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n51,442,415 \n(D) \n(D) \n1,005,523 \n2,822,848 \n8,394,415 \n10,388,050 \n13,374,970 \n15,142,878 \n9,918,685 \n2,820,856 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n208,315 \n \n \n \n(X) \n \n10,405 \n \n31,638 \n \n \n \n4,728,985 \n58,963 \n108,139 \n329,412 \n609,309 \n1,217,587 \n870,062 \n730,767 \n804,746 \n429,639 \n168,208 \n \n \n \n136 \n441 \n1,190 \n2,985 \n2,640 \n1,461 \n467 \n427 \n24 \n12 \n4 \n \n172 \n- \n3 \n16 \n20 \n63 \n38 \n23 \n8 \n1 \n \n41 \n- \n- \n3 \n10 \n15 \n4 \n2 \n7 \n \n31 \n- \n- \n2 \n7 \n10 \n5 \n1 \n6 \n \n11 \n \n836 \n35 \n39 \n77 \n131 \n217 \n153 \n122 \n62 \n51 \n6 \n5 \n- \n \n824 \n35 \n39 \n74 \n126 \n213 \n154 \n121 \n62 \n51 \n6 \n5 \n- \n \n14 \n \n \n \n10 \n \n1 \n \n2 \n \n \n \n4,400 \n320 \n283 \n745 \n1,008 \n1,255 \n478 \n228 \n83 \n55 \n16 \n \n \n \n2,435 \n14,139 \n73,777 \n369,529 \n623,978 \n618,365 \n372,526 \n311,533 \n27,686 \n22,201 \n11,106 \n \n51,671 \n- \n60 \n(D) \n1,490 \n8,771 \n13,286 \n14,678 \n10,064 \n(D) \n \n5,911 \n- \n- \n102 \n525 \n1,519 \n922 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n4,447 \n- \n- \n(D) \n310 \n799 \n1,043 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n1,464 \n \n110,220 \n289 \n640 \n2,378 \n7,350 \n22,606 \n25,174 \n27,399 \n24,384 \n16,661 \n4,147 \n3,576 \n- \n \n109,252 \n(D) \n640 \n(D) \n7,062 \n22,084 \n25,321 \n27,252 \n24,319 \n16,596 \n4,147 \n3,576 \n- \n \n968 \n \n \n \n318 \n \n(D) \n \n(D) \n \n \n \n396,397 \n2,349 \n4,492 \n20,530 \n54,295 \n122,800 \n93,084 \n63,663 \n35,184 \n20,552 \n7,072 \n \n \n \n573 \n1,615 \n3,230 \n5,450 \n3,483 \n1,520 \n337 \n314 \n15 \n7 \n1 \n \n162 \n3 \n- \n13 \n30 \n57 \n37 \n14 \n7 \n1 \n \n222 \n4 \n3 \n18 \n36 \n92 \n44 \n24 \n1 \n \n163 \n4 \n3 \n14 \n29 \n62 \n35 \n15 \n1 \n \n69 \n \n8,037 \n336 \n466 \n1,106 \n1,627 \n2,194 \n1,213 \n734 \n361 \n306 \n43 \n10 \n2 \n \n7,895 \n309 \n441 \n1,069 \n1,592 \n2,180 \n1,211 \n733 \n360 \n305 \n43 \n10 \n2 \n \n164 \n \n \n \n60 \n \n29 \n \n- \n \n \n \n20,576 \n3,839 \n2,586 \n4,164 \n3,935 \n3,667 \n1,410 \n640 \n335 \n238 \n57 \n \n \n \n11,160 \n59,347 \n230,107 \n880,639 \n1,204,023 \n990,747 \n455,291 \n390,243 \n32,865 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n44,938 \n30 \n- \n(D) \n2,223 \n8,651 \n12,413 \n9,595 \n8,512 \n(D) \n \n47,575 \n23 \n55 \n(D) \n2,538 \n13,888 \n14,772 \n14,195 \n(D) \n \n34,104 \n22 \n55 \n(D) \n2,108 \n9,927 \n11,335 \n8,729 \n(D) \n \n13,471 \n \n1,964,302 \n2,972 \n9,092 \n39,475 \n114,901 \n344,971 \n424,603 \n490,515 \n537,773 \n392,478 \n97,883 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n1,955,736 \n2,710 \n8,579 \n38,238 \n112,511 \n343,184 \n423,816 \n490,050 \n536,648 \n391,353 \n97,883 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n8,566 \n \n \n \n3,769 \n \n545 \n \n- \n \n \n \n2,563,515 \n31,090 \n48,804 \n145,918 \n269,454 \n552,439 \n478,044 \n427,738 \n610,028 \n301,511 \n130,162 \n \n \n \n478,529 \n2,675,458 \n10,854,104 \n42,551,795 \n59,724,992 \n50,186,729 \n22,930,957 \n19,769,271 \n1,588,968 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n1,064,504 \n751 \n- \n(D) \n51,250 \n198,829 \n285,824 \n228,059 \n222,555 \n(D) \n \n61,133,340 \n25,512 \n84,308 \n(D) \n3,248,720 \n18,410,892 \n21,590,744 \n15,273,958 \n(D) \n \n42,461,345 \n24,012 \n84,308 \n(D) \n2,368,199 \n13,474,636 \n15,440,975 \n8,819,409 \n(D) \n \n18,671,995 \n \n81,748,076 \n107,761 \n350,934 \n1,501,040 \n4,559,655 \n14,000,436 \n18,364,673 \n20,725,070 \n22,138,507 \n16,275,125 \n4,040,809 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n81,449,590 \n97,243 \n332,445 \n1,461,006 \n4,474,033 \n13,954,653 \n18,331,144 \n20,720,677 \n22,078,389 \n16,215,007 \n4,040,809 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n298,486 \n \n \n \n(X) \n \n21,216 \n \n- \n \n \n \n6,289,171 \n78,165 \n128,293 \n432,159 \n833,596 \n1,705,938 \n1,294,608 \n902,411 \n914,001 \n505,923 \n167,670 \n \n \n \n130 \n446 \n1,256 \n2,791 \n2,153 \n1,010 \n247 \n227 \n14 \n5 \n1 \n \n162 \n3 \n- \n13 \n30 \n57 \n37 \n14 \n7 \n1 \n \n104 \n4 \n3 \n9 \n14 \n42 \n22 \n10 \n- \n \n64 \n4 \n3 \n4 \n8 \n24 \n13 \n8 \n- \n \n41 \n \n1,711 \n32 \n35 \n107 \n264 \n540 \n383 \n213 \n137 \n115 \n15 \n5 \n2 \n \n1,681 \n31 \n30 \n102 \n253 \n536 \n379 \n214 \n136 \n114 \n15 \n5 \n2 \n \n35 \n \n \n \n13 \n \n2 \n \n- \n \n \n \n5,024 \n354 \n308 \n771 \n1,128 \n1,466 \n652 \n233 \n112 \n82 \n18 \n \n \n \n2,270 \n14,363 \n76,387 \n344,470 \n515,984 \n431,490 \n184,701 \n154,592 \n16,635 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n44,938 \n30 \n- \n(D) \n2,223 \n8,651 \n12,413 \n9,595 \n8,512 \n(D) \n \n15,362 \n23 \n41 \n318 \n905 \n5,402 \n4,473 \n4,200 \n- \n \n9,285 \n22 \n41 \n106 \n520 \n3,148 \n2,025 \n3,423 \n- \n \n6,077 \n \n256,119 \n209 \n549 \n3,084 \n14,837 \n59,569 \n70,115 \n52,691 \n55,065 \n38,241 \n11,410 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n253,681 \n199 \n464 \n2,937 \n14,233 \n59,215 \n69,375 \n52,603 \n54,655 \n37,831 \n11,410 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n2,438 \n \n \n \n1,183 \n \n(D) \n \n- \n \n \n \n494,391 \n2,624 \n4,987 \n21,272 \n57,880 \n147,906 \n131,295 \n73,698 \n54,729 \n33,454 \n(D) \n --continued \n2012 Census of Agriculture - State Data Nebraska 29 \nUSDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service Table 37. Specified Crops by Acres Harvested: 2012 and 2007 (continued) \n [Totals may not add due to rounding. For meaning of abbreviations and symbols, see introductory text.] \nCrop 2012 2007 \nFarms Acres Quantity Irrigated land Farms Acres Quantity Irrigated land \nFarms Acres Farms Acres \nHAY, FORAGE, AND FIELD AND GRASS SEEDS - Con. \n \nForage - land used for all hay and all \n haylage, grass silage, and greenchop (tons, \n dry equivalent) (see text) - Con. \n \n 3,000 to 4,999 acres ................................ ..................... \n 5,000 acres or more ................................ ..................... \n \nHay - All hay including alfalfa, other tame, \n small grain, and wild (tons, dry) (see text) .......................... \n 1 to 14 acres ................................ ................................ .... \n 15 to 24 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 25 to 49 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 50 to 99 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 100 to 249 acres ................................ .............................. \n 250 to 499 acres ................................ .............................. \n 500 to 999 acres ................................ .............................. \n 1,000 acres or more ................................ ......................... \n 1,000 to 1,999 acres ................................ ..................... \n 2,000 to 2,999 acres ................................ ..................... \n 3,000 to 4,999 acres ................................ ..................... \n 5,000 acres or more ................................ ..................... \n \n Alfalfa hay (tons, dry) ................................ ....................... \n 1 to 14 acres ................................ ................................ \n 15 to 24 acres ................................ .............................. \n 25 to 49 acres ................................ .............................. \n 50 to 99 a cres ................................ .............................. \n 100 to 249 acres ................................ .......................... \n 250 to 499 acres ................................ .......................... \n 500 to 999 acres ................................ .......................... \n 1,000 acres or more ................................ ..................... \n 1,000 to 1,999 acres ................................ ................. \n 2,000 to 2,999 acres ................................ ................. \n 3,000 to 4,999 acres ................................ ................. \n 5,000 acres or more ................................ ................. \n \n Small grain hay (tons, dry) ................................ ............... \n 1 to 14 acres ................................ ................................ \n 15 to 24 acres ................................ .............................. \n 25 to 49 acres ................................ .............................. \n 50 to 99 acres ................................ .............................. \n 100 to 249 acres ................................ .......................... \n 250 to 499 acres ................................ .......................... \n 500 to 999 acres ................................ .......................... \n 1,000 acres or more ................................ ..................... \n \n Other tame hay (tons, dry) ................................ ............... \n 1 to 14 acres ................................ ................................ \n 15 to 24 acres ................................ .............................. \n 25 to 49 acres ................................ .............................. \n 50 to 99 acres ................................ .............................. \n 100 to 249 acres ................................ .......................... \n 250 to 499 acres ................................ .......................... \n 500 to 999 acres ................................ .......................... \n 1,000 acres or more ................................ ..................... \n \n Wild hay (tons, dry) ................................ .......................... \n 1 to 14 acres ................................ ................................ \n 15 to 24 acres ................................ .............................. \n 25 to 49 acres ................................ .............................. \n 50 to 99 acres ................................ .............................. \n 100 to 249 acres ................................ .......................... \n 250 to 499 acres ................................ .......................... \n 500 to 999 acres ................................ .......................... \n 1,000 acres or more ................................ ..................... \n 1,000 t o 1,999 acres ................................ ................. \n 2,000 to 2,999 acres ................................ ................. \n 3,000 to 4,999 acres ................................ ................. \n 5,000 acres or more ................................ ................. \n \nAll haylage, grass silage, and greenchop \n (tons, green) ................................ ................................ ....... \n 1 to 14 acres ................................ ................................ .... \n 15 to 24 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 25 to 49 acres ................................ ................................ .. \n 50 to 99 a cres ................................ ................................ .. \n 100 to 249 acres ................................ .............................. \n 250 to 499 acres ................................ .............................. \n 500 to 999 acres ................................ .............................. \n 1,000 acres or more ................................ ......................... \n \n Haylage or greenchop from alfalfa or alfalfa \n mixtures (tons, green) ................................ .................... \n 1 to 14 acres ................................ ................................ \n 15 to 24 acres ................................ .............................. \n 25 to 49 acres ................................ .............................. \n 50 to 99 acres ................................ .............................. \n 100 to 249 acres ................................ .......................... \n 250 to 499 acres ................................ .......................... \n 500 to 999 acres ................................ .......................... \n 1,000 acres or more ................................ ..................... \n \n Other haylage, grass silage, and greenchop, \n excluding corn and sorghum silage (tons, green) ........... \n 1 to 1 4 acres ................................ ................................ \n 15 to 24 acres ................................ .............................. \n 25 to 49 acres ................................ .............................. \n 50 to 99 acres ................................ .............................. \n 100 to 249 acres ................................ .......................... \n \n \n \n \n \n22 \n14 \n \n \n19,615 \n3,613 \n2,626 \n4,052 \n3,712 \n3,431 \n1,170 \n660 \n351 \n244 \n71 \n22 \n14 \n \n13,280 \n2,904 \n2,105 \n3,189 \n2,610 \n1,882 \n449 \n117 \n24 \n20 \n2 \n2 \n- \n \n1,543 \n304 \n222 \n388 \n344 \n219 \n54 \n12 \n- \n \n3,744 \n1,037 \n586 \n727 \n647 \n475 \n178 \n63 \n31 \n \n6,619 \n1,390 \n944 \n1,245 \n998 \n1,014 \n412 \n351 \n265 \n182 \n55 \n17 \n11 \n \n \n1,032 \n235 \n173 \n226 \n206 \n154 \n32 \n3 \n3 \n \n \n395 \n70 \n62 \n86 \n82 \n78 \n14 \n2 \n1 \n \n \n672 \n185 \n117 \n148 \n125 \n77 \n \n \n \n \n \n77,586 \n81,526 \n \n \n2,443,603 \n29,727 \n49,587 \n142,122 \n254,167 \n518,900 \n401,708 \n431,212 \n616,180 \n303,533 \n153,815 \n77,586 \n81,246 \n \n885,885 \n23,740 \n39,822 \n111,375 \n176,731 \n273,502 \n151,600 \n73,318 \n35,797 \n24,972 \n(D) \n(D) \n- \n \n99,990 \n2,432 \n4,217 \n13,537 \n22,467 \n31,269 \n17,612 \n8,456 \n- \n \n315,357 \n8,342 \n10,771 \n24,832 \n44,601 \n71,454 \n60,787 \n38,037 \n56,533 \n \n1,142,371 \n11,131 \n17,799 \n43,379 \n67,164 \n156,326 \n142,682 \n232,557 \n471,333 \n228,322 \n119,893 \n59,402 \n63,716 \n \n \n66,677 \n1,907 \n3,221 \n7,859 \n14,227 \n21,484 \n10,721 \n2,114 \n5,144 \n \n \n29,253 \n497 \n1,176 \n3,067 \n5,701 \n10,922 \n4,576 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n \n37,424 \n1,548 \n2,153 \n5,085 \n8,505 \n10,656 \n \n \n \n \n \n118,648 \n88,251 \n \n \n4,605,325 \n59,334 \n106,341 \n321,926 \n589,007 \n1,187,033 \n834,566 \n716,420 \n790,698 \n424,935 \n164,266 \n113,705 \n87,792 \n \n2,737,484 \n59,596 \n107,540 \n326,945 \n527,628 \n859,551 \n484,289 \n239,201 \n132,734 \n93,118 \n(D) \n(D) \n- \n \n167,945 \n4,017 \n5,806 \n23,382 \n40,321 \n61,258 \n24,895 \n8,266 \n- \n \n469,831 \n11,683 \n13,384 \n35,700 \n74,097 \n116,379 \n96,780 \n46,722 \n75,086 \n \n1,230,065 \n12,634 \n20,790 \n49,053 \n78,880 \n166,006 \n154,523 \n252,162 \n496,017 \n261,115 \n104,462 \n58,353 \n72,087 \n \n \n250,251 \n5,396 \n11,599 \n37,499 \n52,000 \n84,702 \n35,707 \n5,968 \n17,380 \n \n \n135,364 \n2,282 \n7,024 \n18,708 \n21,254 \n53,612 \n17,485 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n \n114,887 \n3,751 \n5,417 \n20,294 \n29,603 \n31,839 \n \n \n \n \n \n9 \n3 \n \n \n4,309 \n315 \n277 \n742 \n975 \n1,232 \n467 \n219 \n82 \n54 \n16 \n9 \n3 \n \n3,735 \n348 \n309 \n820 \n961 \n947 \n266 \n68 \n16 \n14 \n1 \n1 \n- \n \n340 \n21 \n23 \n90 \n99 \n83 \n21 \n3 \n- \n \n517 \n64 \n49 \n107 \n131 \n114 \n40 \n8 \n4 \n \n375 \n47 \n47 \n69 \n45 \n83 \n36 \n30 \n18 \n12 \n4 \n2 \n- \n \n \n249 \n20 \n29 \n65 \n65 \n55 \n12 \n2 \n1 \n \n \n153 \n8 \n19 \n36 \n36 \n43 \n9 \n1 \n1 \n \n \n103 \n20 \n13 \n27 \n27 \n14 \n \n \n \n \n \n6,393 \n1,167 \n \n \n389,745 \n2,280 \n4,382 \n20,490 \n52,829 \n121,138 \n90,984 \n63,908 \n33,734 \n19,382 \n7,072 \n6,393 \n887 \n \n303,659 \n2,680 \n5,132 \n24,507 \n54,316 \n108,025 \n64,298 \n31,066 \n13,635 \n(D) \n(D) \n(D) \n- \n \n23,908 \n119 \n390 \n2,957 \n5,751 \n8,746 \n4,675 \n1,270 \n- \n \n35,160 \n374 \n674 \n2,787 \n7,195 \n11,782 \n8,420 \n2,367 \n1,561 \n \n27,018 \n300 \n606 \n1,476 \n2,202 \n6,579 \n4,320 \n4,445 \n7,090 \n5,083 \n(D) \n(D) \n- \n \n \n17,014 \n(D) \n453 \n1,874 \n4,189 \n5,935 \n2,030 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n \n11,825 \n48 \n(D) \n1,104 \n2,198 \n4,570 \n1,300 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n \n5,189 \n(D) \n190 \n818 \n1,898 \n1,510 \n \n \n \n \n \n28 \n12 \n \n \n20,289 \n3,752 \n2,550 \n4,038 \n3,897 \n3,653 \n1,417 \n647 \n335 \n239 \n57 \n27 \n12 \n \n14,820 \n3,105 \n2,105 \n3,378 \n3,025 \n2,422 \n601 \n156 \n28 \n23 \n3 \n2 \n- \n \n1,871 \n452 \n330 \n428 \n371 \n245 \n39 \n3 \n3 \n \n4,048 \n1,228 \n663 \n790 \n657 \n503 \n144 \n45 \n18 \n \n6,447 \n1,419 \n946 \n1,248 \n903 \n913 \n448 \n320 \n250 \n175 \n46 \n19 \n10 \n \n \n962 \n244 \n144 \n239 \n166 \n138 \n17 \n9 \n5 \n \n \n418 \n66 \n58 \n99 \n88 \n85 \n12 \n7 \n3 \n \n \n575 \n194 \n91 \n148 \n81 \n53 \n \n \n \n \n \n103,037 \n75,318 \n \n \n2,567,911 \n30,354 \n48,186 \n141,804 \n267,160 \n551,904 \n482,930 \n436,079 \n609,494 \n303,420 \n130,127 \n99,829 \n76,118 \n \n1,085,921 \n25,276 \n39,942 \n118,241 \n204,987 \n353,590 \n201,388 \n99,358 \n43,139 \n27,976 \n(D) \n(D) \n- \n \n104,301 \n3,682 \n6,237 \n14,737 \n24,388 \n34,838 \n12,817 \n2,102 \n5,500 \n \n278,810 \n9,578 \n12,288 \n27,441 \n44,454 \n71,987 \n48,160 \n28,553 \n36,349 \n \n1,098,879 \n11,149 \n17,554 \n43,098 \n60,001 \n134,742 \n154,579 \n219,424 \n458,332 \n223,531 \n103,300 \n71,239 \n60,262 \n \n \n62,362 \n2,051 \n2,680 \n8,096 \n11,236 \n19,317 \n5,655 \n5,611 \n7,716 \n \n \n35,845 \n568 \n1,096 \n3,439 \n5,887 \n11,496 \n3,803 \n4,367 \n5,189 \n \n \n26,517 \n1,611 \n1,689 \n5,000 \n5,563 \n8,000 \n \n \n \n \n \n162,349 \n78,060 \n \n \n6,106,699 \n76,310 \n123,829 \n409,182 \n798,294 \n1,651,048 \n1,267,538 \n909,002 \n871,496 \n504,756 \n154,779 \n133,901 \n78,060 \n \n3,955,881 \n76,227 \n128,278 \n412,057 \n749,510 \n1,318,678 \n759,491 \n346,107 \n165,533 \n115,092 \n(D) \n(D) \n- \n \n222,395 \n6,883 \n12,365 \n30,279 \n56,977 \n80,911 \n24,014 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n555,048 \n17,577 \n24,006 \n59,552 \n104,624 \n165,820 \n96,974 \n43,337 \n43,158 \n \n1,373,375 \n17,049 \n26,478 \n64,732 \n86,991 \n191,097 \n193,419 \n289,059 \n504,550 \n267,682 \n103,260 \n69,327 \n64,281 \n \n \n369,152 \n9,540 \n11,438 \n47,039 \n60,306 \n122,253 \n36,814 \n19,462 \n62,300 \n \n \n249,074 \n3,446 \n5,956 \n21,396 \n35,772 \n88,197 \n30,393 \n16,286 \n47,628 \n \n \n120,078 \n6,749 \n6,194 \n27,955 \n27,380 \n34,371 \n \n \n \n \n \n11 \n1 \n \n \n4,956 \n355 \n296 \n739 \n1,093 \n1,469 \n654 \n237 \n113 \n86 \n16 \n10 \n1 \n \n4,405 \n382 \n334 \n845 \n1,133 \n1,227 \n360 \n103 \n21 \n18 \n2 \n1 \n- \n \n391 \n46 \n30 \n78 \n117 \n100 \n17 \n1 \n2 \n \n578 \n78 \n66 \n81 \n144 \n161 \n37 \n7 \n4 \n \n345 \n39 \n32 \n74 \n61 \n61 \n49 \n19 \n10 \n8 \n1 \n1 \n- \n \n \n244 \n34 \n19 \n56 \n52 \n64 \n10 \n5 \n4 \n \n \n154 \n19 \n12 \n30 \n31 \n48 \n8 \n4 \n2 \n \n \n95 \n19 \n7 \n27 \n22 \n17 \n \n \n \n \n \n12,636 \n(D) \n \n \n485,739 \n2,607 \n4,751 \n20,451 \n56,008 \n146,731 \n128,287 \n77,047 \n49,857 \n33,513 \n(D) \n8,855 \n(D) \n \n389,516 \n2,934 \n5,287 \n24,547 \n63,619 \n135,926 \n87,777 \n47,444 \n21,982 \n(D) \n(D) \n(D) \n- \n \n28,872 \n340 \n509 \n2,394 \n6,769 \n12,468 \n5,192 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n42,600 \n464 \n924 \n2,332 \n8,090 \n17,588 \n8,155 \n3,955 \n1,092 \n \n24,751 \n208 \n396 \n1,825 \n2,146 \n4,554 \n8,306 \n2,471 \n4,845 \n(D) \n(D) \n(D) \n- \n \n \n21,828 \n242 \n299 \n1,612 \n2,877 \n7,613 \n1,761 \n1,884 \n5,540 \n \n \n14,883 \n144 \n199 \n(D) \n1,840 \n5,517 \n1,884 \n1,240 \n(D) \n \n \n6,945 \n110 \n(D) \n737 \n1,258 \n2,478 \n --continued \n30 Nebraska 2012 Census of Agriculture - State Data USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service Table 37. Specified Crops by Acres Harvested: 2012 and 2007 (continued) \n [Totals may not add due to rounding. For meaning of abbreviations and symbols, see introductory text.] \nCrop 2012 2007 \nFarms Acres Quantity Irrigated land Farms Acres Quantity Irrigated land \nFarms Acres Farms Acres \nHAY, FORAGE, AND FIELD AND GRASS SEEDS - Con. \n \nAll haylage, grass silage, and greenchop \n (tons, green) - Con. \n Other haylage, grass silage, and greenchop, \n excluding corn and sorghum silage (tons, \n green) - Con. \n \n 250 to 499 acres ................................ .......................... \n 500 to 999 acres ................................ .......................... \n 1,000 acres or more ................................ ..................... \n \nOTHER SPECIFIED CROPS \n \nLand in vegetables (see text) ................................ .............. \n 0.1 to 0.9 acres ................................ ................................ \n 1.0 to 4.9 acres ................................ ................................ \n 5.0 to 14.9 acres ................................ .............................. \n 15.0 to 24.9 acres ................................ ............................ \n 25.0 to 49.9 acr es ................................ ............................ \n 50.0 to 99.9 acres ................................ ............................ \n 100.0 to 249.9 acres ................................ ........................ \n 250.0 to 499.9 acres ................................ ........................ \n 500.0 to 749.9 acres ................................ ........................ \n 750.0 to 999.9 acres ................................ ........................ \n 1,000.0 acres or more ................................ ...................... \n \nLand in orchards (see text) ................................ .................. \n \nLand in berries (see text) ................................ ..................... \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n17 \n1 \n2 \n \n \n \n474 \n208 \n165 \n49 \n13 \n5 \n8 \n5 \n6 \n6 \n1 \n8 \n \n372 \n \n140 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n5,633 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n \n \n25,931 \n93 \n322 \n415 \n236 \n(D) \n507 \n713 \n2,282 \n3,319 \n(D) \n16,919 \n \n1,286 \n \n144 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n15,834 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n \n \n(X) \n(X) \n(X) \n(X) \n(X) \n(X) \n(X) \n(X) \n(X) \n(X) \n(X) \n(X) \n \n(X) \n \n(X) \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n2 \n- \n- \n \n \n \n267 \n110 \n93 \n27 \n3 \n5 \n7 \n2 \n6 \n5 \n1 \n8 \n \n131 \n \n34 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n(D) \n- \n- \n \n \n \n24,098 \n47 \n155 \n204 \n(D) \n114 \n(D) \n(D) \n2,282 \n(D) \n(D) \n16,905 \n \n339 \n \n43 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n5 \n2 \n1 \n \n \n \n340 \n102 \n134 \n43 \n6 \n15 \n9 \n6 \n12 \n4 \n- \n9 \n \n339 \n \n68 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n1,732 \n(D) \n(D) \n \n \n \n23,622 \n41 \n242 \n361 \n119 \n518 \n585 \n792 \n3,723 \n2,474 \n- \n14,767 \n \n1,500 \n \n78 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n(D) \n(D) \n(D) \n \n \n \n(X) \n(X) \n(X) \n(X) \n(X) \n(X) \n(X) \n(X) \n(X) \n(X) \n(X) \n(X) \n \n(X) \n \n(X) \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n1 \n1 \n1 \n \n \n \n182 \n47 \n66 \n20 \n3 \n12 \n6 \n5 \n11 \n4 \n- \n8 \n \n140 \n \n27 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n(D) \n(D) \n(D) \n \n \n \n20,945 \n(D) \n101 \n146 \n(D) \n316 \n329 \n609 \n3,458 \n2,405 \n- \n13,520 \n \n456 \n \n49 "
} |
[
-0.1267319619655609,
-0.015485668554902077,
0.0552874393761158,
-0.019067080691456795,
0.05774003639817238,
-0.06277260929346085,
0.045721057802438736,
0.03631691262125969,
0.06526369601488113,
-0.09479054808616638,
-0.017005298286676407,
0.011012853123247623,
0.006065887399017811,
0.03328854218125343,
-0.05400596931576729,
0.03821214288473129,
0.048002421855926514,
0.00030560558661818504,
-0.04280349612236023,
-0.06306813657283783,
0.04259774833917618,
-0.026492955163121223,
0.019515108317136765,
-0.08429568260908127,
0.030506150797009468,
0.014369139447808266,
0.04534636810421944,
-0.04419760778546333,
-0.07181898504495621,
-0.018642688170075417,
-0.039357710629701614,
0.00708236126229167,
-0.08039133995771408,
0.01744459941983223,
0.04233214259147644,
0.062773197889328,
-0.007315144408494234,
0.020164532586932182,
0.034652311354875565,
-0.0012908754870295525,
-0.012256238609552383,
-0.0966096892952919,
0.02267519384622574,
0.017963731661438942,
-0.027889441698789597,
-0.02515213005244732,
0.003573889611288905,
-0.09385694563388824,
-0.07666078209877014,
-0.01425295788794756,
-0.03976867347955704,
-0.07894023507833481,
0.02391926757991314,
0.04829728975892067,
-0.05810375511646271,
0.05619481950998306,
0.1352977156639099,
-0.004499814473092556,
0.01848418451845646,
-0.038270752876996994,
0.049088843166828156,
-0.06004992872476578,
-0.07087960094213486,
0.012483056634664536,
-0.030008114874362946,
-0.07176992297172546,
0.05539789795875549,
0.011305921711027622,
-0.0274610947817564,
-0.110011987388134,
-0.005418532527983189,
-0.003477805992588401,
-0.063331238925457,
0.039172686636447906,
0.07063384354114532,
-0.03858311474323273,
0.08162053674459457,
0.11130056530237198,
0.11046551913022995,
-0.0628330335021019,
0.09568136185407639,
0.03200696408748627,
-0.041530363261699677,
-0.0332535095512867,
0.001959801884368062,
0.06284740567207336,
-0.06415873765945435,
0.0974847748875618,
0.012361648492515087,
-0.009278916753828526,
-0.025043820962309837,
-0.025944404304027557,
0.06759156286716461,
0.025119299069046974,
-0.03388833627104759,
0.02140701375901699,
-0.02025993913412094,
-0.030767247080802917,
0.004442404489964247,
0.026285268366336823,
0.010796171613037586,
0.09464909136295319,
-0.05256803333759308,
0.02609880268573761,
-0.09350128471851349,
-0.028648752719163895,
-0.024591868743300438,
0.024814080446958542,
0.013938906602561474,
0.019359242171049118,
0.04513135552406311,
0.06815172731876373,
-0.023448606953024864,
-0.011570668779313564,
-0.04124705493450165,
0.05083726719021797,
-0.12887407839298248,
0.07061871886253357,
-0.008207105100154877,
-0.0022870523389428854,
-0.029507679864764214,
0.017831265926361084,
-0.09878623485565186,
-0.03813246265053749,
-0.013029827736318111,
-0.024454306811094284,
-0.06203600391745567,
-1.1572543289584979e-34,
-0.038586392998695374,
0.13551095128059387,
0.046199847012758255,
0.028045987710356712,
-0.012133566662669182,
0.01016597356647253,
0.04725506529211998,
0.005064215511083603,
-0.029332540929317474,
-0.06969436258077621,
-0.1065523624420166,
0.10279276221990585,
-0.03512236475944519,
0.025400348007678986,
-0.08502218127250671,
-0.023572057485580444,
0.04428505524992943,
0.025091953575611115,
0.07817913591861725,
0.04993939772248268,
0.07590721547603607,
0.002031408715993166,
0.000050137790822191164,
0.031145593151450157,
0.03828029707074165,
0.02252519130706787,
-0.032008275389671326,
0.02082623541355133,
0.036660127341747284,
0.04702086001634598,
-0.08004093170166016,
0.00816447101533413,
0.01174051221460104,
0.007985057309269905,
0.01637805439531803,
-0.04807677119970322,
0.0025150880683213472,
-0.08950389176607132,
0.027937762439250946,
0.041455987840890884,
-0.022459423169493675,
0.1094871461391449,
-0.01895907334983349,
0.05769244208931923,
-0.053849995136260986,
-0.0004955370677635074,
0.09005406498908997,
0.009344043210148811,
0.07657234370708466,
0.06022125110030174,
-0.09781086444854736,
-0.06191140413284302,
0.10449814051389694,
-0.05115191638469696,
0.11991125345230103,
-0.053006548434495926,
0.035111088305711746,
-0.010863731615245342,
0.06534112244844437,
0.009663895703852177,
-0.007433959282934666,
0.06649769097566605,
-0.018979769200086594,
0.08367008715867996,
-0.00511187082156539,
-0.05559518560767174,
-0.007183023728430271,
-0.03502582758665085,
0.0010133041068911552,
0.020271865651011467,
-0.0724555253982544,
0.04531845077872276,
-0.010848501697182655,
0.0014399930369108915,
-0.016833512112498283,
-0.05827367305755615,
-0.04578861594200134,
0.031224029138684273,
-0.03902343288064003,
-0.021913673728704453,
-0.026867365464568138,
0.015733465552330017,
0.025746295228600502,
-0.0795624628663063,
0.014901501126587391,
-0.03278111293911934,
-0.06253000348806381,
0.05141954869031906,
0.007361855357885361,
0.0677088275551796,
0.018172191455960274,
-0.007540032733231783,
0.05171055346727371,
0.12462922930717468,
0.024048488587141037,
-1.3406406312363905e-34,
0.0052389102056622505,
-0.03196098655462265,
-0.019635681062936783,
0.02649887092411518,
-0.014971494674682617,
-0.016311412677168846,
0.06363791227340698,
-0.06754333525896072,
-0.0011904702987521887,
-0.043048400431871414,
0.01496914867311716,
0.037438079714775085,
-0.004406182561069727,
-0.015497848391532898,
-0.0023597870022058487,
0.04207663983106613,
0.00790246482938528,
-0.10346129536628723,
-0.034923359751701355,
-0.04676906391978264,
0.017088020220398903,
0.10524652153253555,
-0.06361032277345657,
0.017855772748589516,
-0.09893401712179184,
-0.015232366509735584,
-0.005003446713089943,
-0.023393893614411354,
-0.00030670149135403335,
0.08387970924377441,
-0.02538999542593956,
-0.043905582278966904,
-0.056262291967868805,
0.10828889906406403,
-0.02579808421432972,
0.005589804612100124,
0.06977379322052002,
-0.011844689026474953,
-0.03167186677455902,
0.06627526879310608,
-0.011598186567425728,
-0.05990622565150261,
-0.017799153923988342,
0.08539664000272751,
-0.012209398671984673,
0.0008633655961602926,
-0.006119647528976202,
-0.06890392303466797,
0.014236866496503353,
-0.006662349216639996,
0.015149851329624653,
-0.0012010596692562103,
-0.02991153858602047,
-0.05805263668298721,
0.027077944949269295,
0.06685854494571686,
0.06528788805007935,
0.06031252443790436,
-0.031352728605270386,
-0.0733550563454628,
0.08734246343374252,
-0.005522539839148521,
0.05035566911101341,
-0.018635639920830727,
-0.01405620202422142,
0.07824139297008514,
0.09283555299043655,
0.03888797387480736,
0.02944382093846798,
-0.04309210181236267,
0.03343507647514343,
-0.054291944950819016,
0.00905403308570385,
-0.12827566266059875,
-0.01720190979540348,
-0.026710348203778267,
0.014413084834814072,
-0.002862413413822651,
-0.10485461354255676,
0.05860358849167824,
-0.06611114740371704,
-0.00285775656811893,
-0.019570328295230865,
-0.007506736554205418,
-0.0030421470291912556,
-0.00099767348729074,
-0.0025099741760641336,
-0.11527741700410843,
-0.04412102326750755,
-0.08964736759662628,
-0.0736413449048996,
-0.06096572056412697,
0.044032830744981766,
0.0013458780013024807,
-0.04579014703631401,
-4.8980997036096596e-8,
-0.0016155989142134786,
-0.0595884807407856,
-0.04047328233718872,
-0.035826437175273895,
-0.04929738491773605,
-0.008566316217184067,
-0.032444462180137634,
0.056360114365816116,
0.055126968771219254,
0.038632579147815704,
-0.022454921156167984,
0.012375975959002972,
0.08051301538944244,
0.09870290756225586,
0.05509238690137863,
0.02936333417892456,
0.06045854464173317,
0.08831793814897537,
-0.017438115552067757,
-0.034512296319007874,
-0.0028509271796792746,
0.05493037775158882,
0.045120567083358765,
0.017472144216299057,
0.006002041511237621,
0.01623241789638996,
-0.004357965663075447,
0.07110132277011871,
0.08099444955587387,
-0.0007950296276248991,
-0.06666529923677444,
-0.024845508858561516,
0.0007591138128191233,
0.018876394256949425,
0.04351077228784561,
-0.02528204396367073,
0.03772486001253128,
-0.010628229938447475,
0.07656072825193405,
0.05970003083348274,
0.007101215422153473,
0.054711684584617615,
-0.11833491921424866,
0.07896225899457932,
-0.024050652980804443,
-0.02366694249212742,
-0.02161203883588314,
-0.03948351740837097,
0.022891629487276077,
0.05867811292409897,
0.01842419058084488,
-0.03645705059170723,
-0.008537787944078445,
0.01592204160988331,
-0.020917223766446114,
0.05199764296412468,
-0.004430364351719618,
-0.046747539192438126,
-0.06253956258296967,
0.025429928675293922,
-0.028079288080334663,
-0.051631927490234375,
0.04156569764018059,
-0.06331191956996918
] | {
"pdf_file": "AF4I2VHMC6A56VICVEDIJ4MH5KRYKFTS.pdf",
"text": "Rep. Luján Applauds Secretary Chu’s Appointment of a Technology Transfer Coordinator\n \nFebruary 23, 2010\n \nWashington, DC – Today, Department of Energy Secretary Steven Chu appointed Dr. Karina\nEdmonds of the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) as the Department of Energy's\nTechnology Transfer Coordinator. The appointment follows a letter from Rep. Ben Ray Luján\nurging action on an appointment. The national Technology Transfer Coordinator will serve as\nthe Secretary of Energy’s principal advisor on technology transfer and commercialization.\nTechnology transfer improves global competitiveness through innovation and helps create jobs\nby commercializing technology developed in our research universities and national laboratories.\n \n“I’m encouraged by Secretary Chu’s appointment of a national Technology Transfer\nCoordinator,” said Rep. Luján. “With this position filled, I hope that we can move forward in a\nmore aggressive and coordinated fashion to support the transfer of technology developed at\nnational laboratories and educational institutions to the marketplace. Technology transfer\npromotes economic growth, provides American manufacturers with a competitive edge, and\naccelerates further innovation.”\n \nAccording to the Department of Energy (DOE), Dr. Edmonds is presently the Director of Jet\nPropulsion Laboratory (JPL) Technology Transfer in Caltech's Office of Technology Transfer.\nHer job duties include licensing technologies developed at both JPL and Caltech to industry and\nstart-ups, managing the JPL patent portfolio, assisting Caltech Start-ups, and managing\nprosecution of Caltech's current patent filings. Dr. Edmonds is also a registered patent agent\nwith the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Her position as DOE's Technology Transfer\nCoordinator was created by the Energy Policy Act of 2005, and this is the first time the DOE has\nappointed a full-time person to fill this role.\n \nOn February 1, Rep. Luján sent a letter to Secretary Steven Chu urging him to appoint a\nnational a Technology Transfer Coordinator.\n \nFebruary 1, 2009\n \n 1 / 3 Rep. Luján Applauds Secretary Chu’s Appointment of a Technology Transfer Coordinator\nDear Secretary Chu,\n \nThank you for your commitment to creating jobs through investments in technology and\ninnovation. Now more than ever, it has become critically important that we talk about growing\nour economy and preparing for the future. The transfer of technology developed in our federal\nlaboratories and our educational institutions to private industry and various levels of government\npromotes economic growth, provides American manufacturers with a competitive edge, and\naccelerates further innovation throughout the economy. Our country is aptly positioned to be a\nleader in technology transfer and commercialization, and it is imperative that we continue to\nsupport federal technology transfer initiatives.\n \nThe federal government spends approximately one third of its annual research and\ndevelopment budget to meet mission requirements in over 700 government laboratories. Much\nof the technology and expertise generated by this investment has applications beyond the\nimmediate goals of federally funded research and development. Results of federal research and\ndevelopment can be used to meet national needs in areas such as clean energy development,\ncomputer technology, and medicine. We must explore the potential for applying novel\ntechnologies to new industrial sectors, but we also need to actively facilitate the partnership and\ncollaboration between the public and private sectors that are vital to ensuring the success of this\ntransfer.\n \nAs you know, Section 1001(a) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 requires the Department of\nEnergy to appoint a Technology Transfer Coordinator to be the Secretary’s principal advisor on\ntechnology transfer and commercialization. The Technology Transfer Coordinator’s role is vital\nas he or she is charged with overseeing the expenditure of funds allocated for technology\ntransfer within the Department, as well as efforts to engage private sector entities. However, this\nrole currently remains unfilled. We are writing to you to ask that you appoint a national\nTechnology Transfer Coordinator as soon as possible. The expeditious appointment of a\nTechnology Transfer Coordinator is critical to ensuring that technology transfer activities at the\nDepartment are being carried out in the most efficient and effective way. Improving technology\ntransfer pathways will promote job growth and innovation, and the appointment of a Technology\nTransfer Coordinator is a key step in this process.\n \nThank you for your consideration of this important issue.\n \nSincerely,\n 2 / 3 Rep. Luján Applauds Secretary Chu’s Appointment of a Technology Transfer Coordinator\n \n 3 / 3"
} |
[
-0.11883839964866638,
0.04829868674278259,
-0.0025480559561401606,
-0.011011209338903427,
0.05195074528455734,
0.010291832499206066,
0.1154332384467125,
0.0007007909007370472,
-0.08592535555362701,
-0.07065396010875702,
0.0013317164266481996,
-0.035472381860017776,
0.018434155732393265,
-0.006737178191542625,
0.024402987211942673,
-0.029503243044018745,
-0.058138374239206314,
-0.05043954402208328,
-0.020765526220202446,
0.029036032035946846,
-0.06367600709199905,
0.024029914289712906,
0.0262432973831892,
-0.006037362851202488,
-0.011076544411480427,
-0.0014006864512339234,
-0.018619801849126816,
0.03277004510164261,
0.0028860096354037523,
-0.05694391578435898,
-0.04394163936376572,
0.025414075702428818,
0.08790954202413559,
-0.02499123103916645,
-0.03668315336108208,
0.0062413448467850685,
-0.06646791845560074,
-0.0671444833278656,
0.020564241334795952,
0.04238877445459366,
0.021880215033888817,
-0.04288247600197792,
-0.03437700495123863,
0.06146686151623726,
0.0656372681260109,
-0.0785202905535698,
0.029487011954188347,
0.010798297822475433,
0.06332410126924515,
-0.04508465901017189,
-0.01823394186794758,
-0.027721041813492775,
-0.0036737609189003706,
-0.03659451752901077,
0.054250262677669525,
-0.02085655927658081,
0.015034922398626804,
-0.060095224529504776,
0.016393909230828285,
-0.03323858231306076,
0.01750349812209606,
-0.0005952207720838487,
-0.16348379850387573,
0.08492093533277512,
-0.07583844661712646,
0.0161097701638937,
0.048382941633462906,
-0.007598146330565214,
-0.024985475465655327,
0.05949747934937477,
0.0658901110291481,
-0.03513742983341217,
0.0008843158720992506,
-0.11567969620227814,
0.049390342086553574,
0.03360460326075554,
0.055154237896203995,
0.026383694261312485,
0.053694359958171844,
0.038932498544454575,
0.0004393816343508661,
0.0180604699999094,
-0.09288253635168076,
-0.004073987249284983,
-0.0008234609267674387,
-0.04883106052875519,
-0.006677441764622927,
-0.023541681468486786,
-0.03813307359814644,
0.05245159938931465,
-0.042493823915719986,
-0.055899728089571,
0.08681583404541016,
-0.04896170645952225,
-0.08339672535657883,
-0.0457635223865509,
0.029042238369584084,
0.03465776517987251,
-0.08649188280105591,
0.4062184691429138,
0.03594949096441269,
0.018697189167141914,
0.0979783833026886,
-0.007865204475820065,
0.023714108392596245,
-0.05756505951285362,
-0.06109985336661339,
-0.006620500702410936,
0.007060033269226551,
0.021669859066605568,
-0.024405108764767647,
-0.033514637500047684,
0.00025015627034008503,
0.03170765936374664,
0.04407161846756935,
0.09463243186473846,
-0.035580113530159,
-0.0045343064703047276,
0.043714847415685654,
0.00020504710846580565,
-0.002858717693015933,
-0.024884076789021492,
0.0037606365513056517,
0.014041258953511715,
0.07781578600406647,
-0.1323145031929016,
0.0068764761090278625,
-7.2201250750405e-33,
0.007334581576287746,
0.002726183971390128,
0.012147537432610989,
-0.002440247917547822,
0.027932560071349144,
0.03927065059542656,
0.003743888111785054,
-0.04643532633781433,
-0.014492551796138287,
0.05360198765993118,
0.006590632256120443,
0.03664784133434296,
-0.023135676980018616,
0.03275369852781296,
0.07811082899570465,
0.009627518244087696,
0.007964123040437698,
0.0028742437716573477,
-0.0018807238666340709,
0.004691542126238346,
-0.012402275577187538,
-0.0008041393011808395,
-0.023038707673549652,
0.04297299310564995,
-0.028259985148906708,
-0.06694644689559937,
0.038539037108421326,
-0.07085712999105453,
0.020109260454773903,
0.001460324041545391,
0.0014639950823038816,
0.049912355840206146,
-0.02594558522105217,
0.0008223677286878228,
-0.03757276013493538,
-0.028740663081407547,
0.03337514027953148,
-0.07462829351425171,
-0.035983964800834656,
0.025680823251605034,
-0.050139084458351135,
0.010837196372449398,
-0.04243791848421097,
-0.002668545348569751,
-0.004916265141218901,
0.16647927463054657,
-0.0011541391722857952,
-0.004960660357028246,
-0.06482207775115967,
0.06976216286420822,
-0.0028182310052216053,
-0.02132517658174038,
-0.11613703519105911,
0.04333868995308876,
-0.0033509607892483473,
-0.020106570795178413,
0.016554009169340134,
-0.043971188366413116,
0.020619438961148262,
-0.009089959785342216,
0.009713641367852688,
0.039391469210386276,
-0.012487754225730896,
0.009350251406431198,
-0.08647788316011429,
-0.04851773753762245,
0.02447775937616825,
-0.008494960144162178,
0.023063570261001587,
-0.012638214975595474,
-0.05100997909903526,
0.03675990551710129,
0.03771744668483734,
0.030916057527065277,
-0.028798431158065796,
-0.01926880143582821,
-0.019831717014312744,
0.03583517670631409,
0.08063048869371414,
0.00649732630699873,
0.03545527532696724,
-0.041958946734666824,
0.006693818140774965,
-0.024078864604234695,
0.09502369910478592,
0.054634999483823776,
0.004220988135784864,
-0.05180729925632477,
0.01021517813205719,
-0.041098661720752716,
-0.03574559465050697,
0.06131820008158684,
-0.0030944310128688812,
0.08796171098947525,
0.006000818684697151,
4.4925641867161134e-33,
-0.07716735452413559,
0.01899317093193531,
-0.03573813661932945,
0.0887979194521904,
-0.01755509153008461,
-0.0027626880910247564,
0.037273939698934555,
0.09013677388429642,
-0.09250447154045105,
0.0680299699306488,
0.022390201687812805,
-0.045089662075042725,
0.030878892168402672,
0.044495198875665665,
-0.005799654871225357,
0.03523358702659607,
0.06968843936920166,
-0.004063474480062723,
-0.028155116364359856,
-0.03572935611009598,
-0.030507177114486694,
-0.03237851336598396,
-0.0024998304434120655,
0.034929435700178146,
-0.04148077219724655,
0.030205287039279938,
0.04858911409974098,
0.0632987916469574,
-0.021693143993616104,
0.036800533533096313,
0.03896567225456238,
-0.023581488057971,
-0.05063262954354286,
-0.05820295587182045,
0.04826247692108154,
0.08404397964477539,
0.03678114339709282,
-0.0007768925279378891,
0.024848245084285736,
-0.05051735043525696,
0.039668887853622437,
-0.010082785040140152,
0.002244437113404274,
0.11697717010974884,
-0.021961307153105736,
-0.005805923603475094,
-0.048092879354953766,
0.003788944333791733,
0.035172659903764725,
0.07729728519916534,
-0.09319712221622467,
-0.011992926709353924,
-0.021968109533190727,
0.04129430651664734,
-0.022958293557167053,
0.004160518292337656,
-0.0432187058031559,
0.0702132061123848,
-0.01905948668718338,
0.0004752702370751649,
0.005480603780597448,
0.026761434972286224,
-0.033612821251153946,
0.01346849836409092,
-0.022746674716472626,
0.03873894736170769,
-0.024523282423615456,
-0.03632815554738045,
-0.0017924589337781072,
-0.052569907158613205,
0.006689464673399925,
-0.025846485048532486,
-0.1348353624343872,
0.0011394252069294453,
-0.047169335186481476,
-0.05347497761249542,
-0.018427148461341858,
-0.007304163184016943,
-0.009657083079218864,
-0.037726134061813354,
-0.033999841660261154,
0.01841733604669571,
-0.008003143593668938,
-0.005512353032827377,
-0.03353199362754822,
-0.0201805979013443,
0.021665804088115692,
0.01075822301208973,
-0.05747472122311592,
0.01969684660434723,
-0.007240809965878725,
0.023037107661366463,
0.12023406475782394,
0.0032419958151876926,
0.010150063782930374,
-1.3403668397415913e-8,
-0.046724583953619,
0.04062063992023468,
-0.05561641603708267,
-0.0018853341462090611,
0.056323979049921036,
0.049638908356428146,
-0.04154156893491745,
0.0325038842856884,
0.02574923262000084,
-0.018780937418341637,
0.06920813769102097,
0.02598794549703598,
-0.02782331220805645,
0.05757509544491768,
0.09128093719482422,
-0.01532574463635683,
-0.10472093522548676,
-0.027585938572883606,
-0.016222817823290825,
-0.035399287939071655,
-0.010461363941431046,
-0.013999390415847301,
-0.0002939800324384123,
-0.08362972736358643,
0.007932317443192005,
0.006960071157664061,
-0.04422977939248085,
0.07475824654102325,
0.07440952211618423,
-0.04058071970939636,
-0.0018266832921653986,
0.01985001191496849,
0.014382191933691502,
0.020585300400853157,
0.02213379554450512,
-0.06437048316001892,
-0.06369856745004654,
0.01613914780318737,
0.009907381609082222,
-0.0055595203302800655,
-0.05467313155531883,
-0.0233115516602993,
0.07046928256750107,
0.006468005012720823,
-0.047700025141239166,
-0.0036470729392021894,
0.007837599143385887,
-0.004974569659680128,
-0.01241857185959816,
-0.07781214267015457,
-0.0009409073390997946,
-0.008002524264156818,
0.006034235469996929,
0.08434933423995972,
0.10730371624231339,
0.011427774094045162,
0.013366665691137314,
-0.012747352942824364,
0.061454374343156815,
0.03564131259918213,
0.1587459295988083,
0.12640950083732605,
0.04654904082417488,
-0.015717294067144394
] | {
"pdf_file": "SUR4MPI7WKZHIFC6ZGVOWBXD6JWE76BV.pdf",
"text": ""
} |
[
-0.06845701485872269,
-0.011205037124454975,
-0.06984221190214157,
-0.00914317648857832,
-0.11315112560987473,
0.0022408287040889263,
0.02790778875350952,
0.17410576343536377,
-0.028702767565846443,
-0.0019990322180092335,
-0.025621086359024048,
-0.00006406848842743784,
0.038547199219465256,
0.010520566254854202,
-0.08963964879512787,
-0.05165783315896988,
0.03555888682603836,
0.050504494458436966,
-0.06143689900636673,
0.058413274586200714,
0.05796439200639725,
0.07829654216766357,
0.04948437213897705,
-0.05163847282528877,
-0.06452450156211853,
0.06090338155627251,
-0.01984347216784954,
-0.15569795668125153,
-0.02962568588554859,
0.06320464611053467,
0.0038562684785574675,
0.043873630464076996,
0.07999616861343384,
-0.08105785399675369,
0.002350123366340995,
-0.0027919034473598003,
-0.03227028623223305,
0.08131065219640732,
-0.02633734792470932,
0.043775200843811035,
-0.08798907697200775,
-0.01946047693490982,
-0.059651851654052734,
-0.018519222736358643,
-0.002939461264759302,
-0.061055999249219894,
-0.052998874336481094,
0.012779111973941326,
-0.03873905539512634,
0.06306992471218109,
-0.06343569606542587,
-0.040818147361278534,
0.0101430369541049,
-0.015077692456543446,
-0.035290345549583435,
-0.04964170232415199,
-0.06090524047613144,
-0.081499382853508,
-0.10599365085363388,
0.038343362510204315,
-0.027947083115577698,
-0.022166624665260315,
-0.020704027265310287,
0.06973393261432648,
0.030424319207668304,
0.019133741036057472,
0.09207708388566971,
-0.07533035427331924,
-0.09582041203975677,
0.05054398998618126,
-0.021223627030849457,
-0.036779407411813736,
0.016151731833815575,
0.0942116305232048,
0.06860902160406113,
0.057171571999788284,
0.1299779862165451,
-0.03998486325144768,
0.023885240778326988,
-0.06777303665876389,
0.04472983255982399,
0.09806820750236511,
0.019146649166941643,
0.039852481335401535,
0.031950417906045914,
-0.027533626183867455,
-0.018765583634376526,
0.027313876897096634,
-0.018216820433735847,
0.03576531633734703,
0.05493541434407234,
0.027752229943871498,
-0.05699513107538223,
0.03017663210630417,
0.10857251286506653,
-0.010932205244898796,
-0.03136211261153221,
0.02447318099439144,
0.04233215004205704,
0.009335034526884556,
-0.08689837157726288,
-0.060113076120615005,
-0.021082010120153427,
0.0540042445063591,
-0.09398595243692398,
-0.054105114191770554,
-0.08285415172576904,
-0.07059364020824432,
0.05833972617983818,
0.00992421805858612,
-0.0005558940465562046,
0.039336152374744415,
-0.011104026809334755,
-0.06667368859052658,
0.02898363769054413,
-0.024736592546105385,
0.01185943279415369,
-0.05455533042550087,
0.10954827815294266,
0.02086223103106022,
0.005928079131990671,
-0.015120781026780605,
-0.01768862083554268,
0.012278502807021141,
0.003151821671053767,
-0.08054174482822418,
0.006761719472706318,
4.086063546522381e-33,
-0.04438744857907295,
0.018057221546769142,
-0.03224816173315048,
0.033764492720365524,
-0.06782813370227814,
0.107313372194767,
-0.011854663491249084,
0.03452765941619873,
0.004578196443617344,
-0.010224751196801662,
-0.007051218766719103,
0.040207721292972565,
0.028045957908034325,
-0.0281729344278574,
-0.018160615116357803,
0.06718964874744415,
0.03711292892694473,
-0.006729347165673971,
-0.07286693155765533,
0.02345707081258297,
0.03009088709950447,
0.0014751007547602057,
0.020142896100878716,
0.062185466289520264,
-0.07521525025367737,
0.056224945932626724,
-0.057022035121917725,
-0.0362679623067379,
-0.048295728862285614,
-0.003757823957130313,
-0.009873236529529095,
-0.06660851091146469,
-0.034865859895944595,
-0.13811053335666656,
-0.0013964558020234108,
-0.027747677639126778,
0.023884009569883347,
-0.023490317165851593,
-0.041851043701171875,
-0.09206566959619522,
-0.0065558189526200294,
0.06038348004221916,
-0.014109715819358826,
-0.021424565464258194,
0.04084421321749687,
-0.01195502933114767,
-0.05567276105284691,
0.07792863994836807,
0.0018750716699287295,
0.06949269771575928,
0.027638578787446022,
0.004027360584586859,
-0.028095437213778496,
-0.018216772004961967,
-0.08613551408052444,
0.03227206692099571,
-0.040639255195856094,
0.011051501147449017,
0.009423148818314075,
0.04561859369277954,
-0.022231033071875572,
-0.0033789039589464664,
0.026489049196243286,
-0.022232506424188614,
-0.04415926709771156,
0.012824286706745625,
-0.0992269515991211,
0.02584628202021122,
0.015534923411905766,
-0.035636529326438904,
-0.06750044226646423,
-0.04064229875802994,
-0.030374955385923386,
0.05830312892794609,
0.013238462619483471,
-0.0027272822335362434,
0.08310765027999878,
0.05246466025710106,
-0.02015714906156063,
0.04305044561624527,
-0.008118173107504845,
0.051152992993593216,
-0.026248890906572342,
-0.024806538596749306,
-0.046507690101861954,
0.03834851086139679,
0.008846798911690712,
-0.060177333652973175,
0.07356350123882294,
-0.003104325383901596,
0.0516311414539814,
0.022785961627960205,
-0.11869306117296219,
0.054826609790325165,
-0.01243923045694828,
-8.297860907544591e-33,
-0.003539321245625615,
-0.019551744684576988,
-0.09590500593185425,
0.0012798717943951488,
0.018785448744893074,
0.05353369191288948,
0.026680542156100273,
0.014328408986330032,
0.03812655806541443,
-0.03825927525758743,
0.07709043473005295,
0.019940217956900597,
-0.025500483810901642,
-0.09569940716028214,
-0.03196980804204941,
0.08819594234228134,
-0.03271205350756645,
0.047585271298885345,
-0.10418586432933807,
0.07671225816011429,
0.0011201619636267424,
0.08982225507497787,
-0.038962472230196,
-0.0010645078727975488,
-0.02421928010880947,
0.04389818385243416,
-0.01866644248366356,
-0.023913109675049782,
-0.0004962467355653644,
0.10232745110988617,
0.05435024946928024,
0.02582055702805519,
-0.08128561824560165,
-0.015277227386832237,
-0.0356171689927578,
-0.0005287954118102789,
0.04859220236539841,
-0.05084238573908806,
-0.075721874833107,
0.020449163392186165,
0.036316487938165665,
0.040714893490076065,
0.011505714617669582,
0.009520793333649635,
0.028652440756559372,
0.07869715243577957,
0.041256170719861984,
-0.027395403012633324,
-0.01971016824245453,
0.0663621723651886,
0.09370223432779312,
0.017122043296694756,
0.01948659121990204,
-0.0005406093550845981,
-0.0025624092668294907,
-0.03638816624879837,
0.0227512177079916,
-0.11298849433660507,
-0.06816884875297546,
-0.00026868487475439906,
0.09008152782917023,
0.03036320209503174,
0.003226084169000387,
-0.019875703379511833,
0.009922675788402557,
-0.0437937006354332,
-0.02517561987042427,
0.05753625929355621,
0.05212777107954025,
-0.012296238914132118,
-0.060394492000341415,
-0.027558479458093643,
0.012944187968969345,
-0.12175241857767105,
0.01026061736047268,
0.03586287423968315,
0.03356798738241196,
-0.06830889731645584,
-0.06857644021511078,
0.03041500598192215,
-0.08843954652547836,
0.0482778325676918,
0.02021656185388565,
0.016162673011422157,
-0.04155449569225311,
-0.039504971355199814,
-0.012117412872612476,
-0.014952920377254486,
0.0015635195886716247,
0.0019475449807941914,
-0.11538823693990707,
0.06452495604753494,
-0.031366363167762756,
-0.033780064433813095,
0.07883886992931366,
-6.508720673537027e-8,
0.01691741682589054,
-0.030939213931560516,
-0.006756648421287537,
0.011913444846868515,
-0.03766871988773346,
-0.1389845758676529,
-0.06031140312552452,
0.029402868822216988,
-0.02128489501774311,
0.08452744036912918,
-0.010158464312553406,
0.13181687891483307,
-0.011266219429671764,
-0.04813208431005478,
-0.01399670448154211,
-0.011368179693818092,
0.032372068613767624,
-0.00888723786920309,
-0.03811667114496231,
-0.031692538410425186,
-0.047303806990385056,
-0.059331707656383514,
0.009300734847784042,
-0.07435964047908783,
-0.022125838324427605,
-0.07539303600788116,
0.015566332265734673,
-0.003918814472854137,
0.00007680839189561084,
0.00786102656275034,
-0.0183488167822361,
0.04354090243577957,
0.013473836705088615,
-0.04730285331606865,
0.022934144362807274,
-0.05888424813747406,
0.022205062210559845,
0.01498815231025219,
-0.03369396924972534,
0.08844443410634995,
-0.00347944931127131,
-0.02997395396232605,
0.05510973557829857,
0.07186979800462723,
-0.029603227972984314,
-0.008173631504178047,
-0.07675866782665253,
0.07077179849147797,
0.06858361512422562,
-0.029361756518483162,
-0.056150734424591064,
0.04050284996628761,
-0.0302524846047163,
-0.03433188423514366,
-0.04621044173836708,
0.04771343618631363,
0.06285087764263153,
-0.015692325308918953,
0.023998161777853966,
-0.03015359491109848,
0.05099697783589363,
-0.04206453263759613,
0.0517776682972908,
-0.049559105187654495
] | {
"pdf_file": "RLGNJP7L3BZWPR6KCTTN5I4DIPFSCP3L.pdf",
"text": "1\nED 127 289AUTHORTITLE I. .\n1NO v73p ,\n1 . 1,D S PRICE, /MF-$0.83 HC $3.5 Plus Po tage.: °! .D SCRIPTORS :*Anemil; *De t'al Health; iterature;11 views; 4dicalCase,Higtori* edlOal N search; 4Nu,rition; f;*ResearchI, I ,\n!.'I ,.\n; 1'DOCUMiNT RESUME\nCh'amber ain, Joyce E.; And.pthers.E\n.SP 010 325\n.\n. The Need, of Dental Health Education: Exploring One .Aspect oMalnutrition and its Relationship to OralvHealth. 1 ,.\nBSTRACTr.9a' ' Y !/I1 The purp ee of this stud is to preise t anexperimental inve ,tigation of th Manife tations of.aphthous /Ulcers', 'glossitis, andch ilosis in the ral, cavities of 25 subjects) the useof ferrous 2111d-on/ate supplements or the control of the lesiOns in 13,subjects, and th hemoglobineve s'atanitiai and final clinicvisits of all subjects for t' e 0 ,iOds varying 'from one month tofour years. On ele basis of the fi dings and within the. limitationposed, it is c cluded that: 41y th presence of the oral lesionsdoes not appga .to be'signifidantly elated to hemoglobin levels,which fall we within the,generally accepted )iormal limits;. ( -2).1although hem g obin levels iarfall irthin the generally acceptednorMa/ limitferrous gluconate supp ements have a/profound effectupon revers 1 of eStablislied Oral lesi ns and the prevention 'ofrecurrence ;(31 hemoglobin levels tha are at theover limits or.below theecognized minimum normal ran e s em to cdompany orpromote the occurrence of oral lesions; female,appear to have atemdency/ toward occurence of irouLdefici cy more often than males,and therefore show more frequent kanifet ions of oral lesions\n..apparentIT related to the hemoglobin lev in the/ blood; (5) whenferrous gluconate supplements au. prescri d foi the management oforal lesions, subjects show an increase in \\ eioglolin determination,' . /. and the majority show marked improvement in\\the oral conditions 1following treatment; (6)when ferrous giuto4ate,supplemens are notprescribed for the management of lesions, subject8\\show noimprovement; and (7) although the regular intake of iron supplements4is not recommended, some subjects require' daily supplements. It isrecommendedthat the relationship between nutrition and dental 'healthbe amplified in school health programs, ex ecially in underprivilegedurban areas. (DMT) --4 IIf\n******************************************* ***************************Documents acqUired by, ERIC include many informal unpublished* materials not available from other sources. ERIC makes every effort ** to obtain the best,copy available. Nevertheless, items of marginal ** reproducibility are often encountered and this affects the quality ** of the microfiche and hardcopy reproductions ERIC makes available ** via the ERIC, Document Reproduction SerVice (EDRS) . EDRS is not *-* responsible for,th quality of the Original document.'Reproductions ** supplied by EDRS,a e the best that can be made from the original. *;****11*****44***** *****************************/*********************\n,1,\n4,\n 4;\n4,\nThe Need ofDenca1. HeExplOring One Aspectand its Relationship\ntibyJoyce E. Chamber ain,Dora) A. Hick , Ed. D.Harsild R. Stanley, D6.S.,B.S.,M.0\nlth EdUcation:if Malnutritioto OralgealM1\n`\"41\nU S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.E UCATIONt WELFARENA FIONAL INSTITUTE OF -EDUCATIONTHIS 00C MEN, HAS BEENOUCEO 'EX CTLY AS REGEIVTHE PERSO OR ORGANIZATIATING IT P INTS OF VIEWSTATED DO qT NEcEssASENT OFF ICIL NAT1ONAEDUCATION OS,iTION\n2\naEPROFROMORIGINOPINIONSII.Y REPRENSTITUTE OFPOLICYc.\n Yl\nI , .,* CHAPTER I\n.INTRODUCTIONp\" I\n'Atypical cOn6.itions in the oral/ cavity may not be considered\n.urgent life or de tb mat ers, but t ey do play important roles in\nthe quality of,health. The oral cavity is /particularly susceptible, . i/ i`-'-,/.t, ,n'utritional.diaficie ies,beca91se.ft metabolic activities\nAKof the epithelial, tiss es.: ThesehighI. aly 'specialized tisties,.\nand their sensitivity0s ,nLoted,bY Sour an Massler(281.\nThe oraltissuesflhavebeecalled the barometer ofith/estate of nutrition of the ody.Subclinical status are,certainlnot rare and f on the standpoint of di nosis,,pei-haps'tle mo6 import: tHfi.ndings are in the m uth....The alvelar bone, the' ingivae and the tongue 'fleet thepresent Internal status or the body accurately rid quickly..\nNerd for the Study'4This is an era when nutritional factors have :ppeaFed to play*/a significant role in preventive dentistry. Various nutritional\nfinadequacies-of the human have been lLnked with arly,matrifestations\n' changes Which occur in the oral cavity, Schur and Massler(28)\nand'Nizel 51agree that although the deficiencies of Vitamin'ITY.d Vitamin C, Vitamin D and of minerals' such as calcium and' phosphorous\nare 1/Pst evident in tootIvand bone development, changes*in the* . ,,. . .t. .. . . .gingivae are also noted. Thesegingivae changes arp linked especially\n4/withdeficiencies of Vitamin 'C, 'Deficiencies of Thiamin, RiWlavin,\"\n(,,. /0\n1. a41.r=I\n 2\n.CIr\n,.and Niacin are also knc,wn,to bring:about changes of,the gingivae',Atongue and oral mucosat, such as anthracosi8 linguae (BlackTongue),.\n.secondary pellagra, periOdontal diseases, and other oral lesions:\nFor a long period time dentists and physicians halte been, . . . .concernel with oeal lesions that appear and-reappearin the mouth'\n.- periodically. 'They include aphthouS ulcers, glossitis, and\ncheilosis.Numerous articleghave been written describing theseu,lesions,prescribinqttherapy and analyzing causes(7i(l2)(25)(27).ine researchers imate that,at least 50 percent or even more of\nr from aphtSous ulcers, many motewomen\":4.if,.and college students with inade 'late dirs.\ni alnutritidn, iron deficieiicyanemia\n1the\n1--tOtal pop 1.4ti n sift\n,/men, yoVer,ishchild\nExploringione segmentdepletion afiron stores)\ngeneral population (4),(6)as been found to be very lo\n.Some reseaIcher.8 claim that0 petthe pOpulation suffers qom somearicre in the \"Clinical Pediatrics\ntritional anemia is one of ,the most widespread ofdeg\nJoee of anemi\nrnal\", the aua.In a recent\nhor noted that\nall health\nroblems according to a tenstate nutrition survey. fkliigh frequencyI 11/I was observed in urban and rural poor children, and'in another articl\nthere yas noted a high frequency among the poor olde pulation.\nThe epithelial 'tissues are dependent upon the iron level 'in\nthe blood to maintain metabolic activities. When iron deficidricy:\noccurs, the oral tdssues are,rhighly affected. It is recognized that\niroredeficiency may be;evidenced in other areas of tthe body before //\nit becomes observable-in the oral tissues, but when the,deficienCy,\ndoes beme'recognizabIe in the oral cavity, it is usually becaldsb\n#1,tJ\n .,:,4.,..ft\n.... ......period-. .,''o? irbn lack.(,v nera extenagdofl'A p, the.Acording to Col?md';s , ...iron stores will be depleted beforMron.--deficiencybcciTies apparent1. .-. . . .\nt.in'the blood. For this'. reason, an .individual may 'show normal, blood\n.,...-level of hemolobin although iron stores are d Oepleted; i._....,, ... The syndrome that incorporated most of the oral lesions such\nt-10as glossitis, angulan cheilosis, and occasionally apht17 us ulcers\n.,and dyiphagia, has been called Plummer-Vinson Syndrome. Iton\n,-leficiency hag been: suggested as a causal contributing f ctorin.the incidence:of these rf;aq.adk:ts when they occur as the syndrome (8) :\n$ Sutton's'Oisease,enComioasses aphthous ulcerbutAdentifXsaNuch\n1.,o /, .-.,4.thD.re'Sev re st .te., The ulcers of Sutton%s Disease'recur perio- .\n1dicaIly,,sin3 ally to a hthous ulcers, but endure fOr extended\nLl ,- . i1 o'.... ./periodbi e and, le v'e scarring, Prithary'iron7deficiency'anemia\nhas 'holenuggesieas a clinic/a' f 't re in Sutton's Disease,i..\\, ,... /that ',but may very,likely o cur asa sec° isRpoit:Ita pearsh\n.4,I#.aphthous ulcers,' 4t ough mildly r oent,of SuttObDisg se,\ni / 1 I\n' it -.could be'of simiiar tiology: :/ i.1 .rCan j.t be determined that iron d ficiency may b aLpre Ursor\nto suchdtalllesionsas glossitis tr d, burning ton ), an ular.,\nCheilosik(cracks in the corners offlthe mouth), and, p thous ulcers\n.e-(Ciliker sores)? Can it be sh6n that when.iron suppl ents aret..)4,')' ' .4I' .-. .-administered, t rheoccurerice,toftheselesions is coA.rolledor\n/\n.4...educed?Therapythiron supplements inl,the treatment of the oral.\ni:11lesions has teen recorded in medical writing, butt references are' . '. . ,sparse.. Suzm(32),Waldenstrom(34),andTarby(I4 have reported\n.1:esing vari us' iron supplethents with success when treating patients\n,- -..,\n'suffering from the Plummer-Vinson Syndrome.\n It seems appropriate.thht additional research i needed in\nordet to substantiate the importance of iron therapy irithe control .4.of manifestations of oral lesions. The significance of Orpl healthI.in total general health is. increased by the multiplicity pf benefits.\nI.The phonetic value in verbal communication, the esthetic va lue in,4humanTacial expretsion, the gustatory pleasures and Masticatory\nfunctiChs which promote, digestive function Cannot be denied. Both .\n1 mental and physical diseomfor t are endured by adults and children\nalike when they are afflicted with these oral lesions. The pain\nand discomfort can lead to behavior changes which can cause serious\nadjustment;problems(31),It is unfortunate that some children so\naffected have been labeled as mentally retarded or backward because\nof th'eir physical inability to respond adequately (1) (21) (31).\nThese conditions in the oral cavity may not ire considered\nurgent -life{ or delequaLoft\nhr\nt eni the e\nD event need, -\n./protective measuratters, buti:they do p\ndi.idual'.shealth'\ntweln hemogl\nI .. ction ooral.can\n/-\n'/ay impo tant roles in\nis i.45;the WiOdd and\nbe used fto pr etter\nering,Knowledge of suche established'\ntion, and\nreventive and\ne'is basic to effective health education.\nPurpose of thitStudy.\n..urpose of this study was to present an experimental4,\n.inve tigation of the manifestation of aphthous ultgers,.glossitis,\nand, cheilosis in the _oral cavities of 25 subjects, the hemoglobin,\nlevels, and the effects of ferrous gluconate supplements on the\n/control of these lesions in selected subjects:\n01\n 441\nrt\nTherapy Jffering limited relief' in the past include:\n1) the topical application of Kenalog in Orabase which is a syntheticsteroid ointment possessing anti-inflammatory fiction and 2) a tetra-\ncycline movth wash.\nVitamin C has been used. extensively by, some dentists and\nphysicians fOr the treatment or prevention of these lesions. Some\nc4dm success while others do. got.40If a relationnip Lean belestablished between the oral lesions\nani anemia, then it is hoped that this knowledge gained concerning4 this segment of malnutrition will bbcome inclusive in the comb\nprri7E5Ive helith education program.\n'41'c\n70\n;'0\nIn\n I6\n'De inition of Terms\nThe followingtermlaredefined as their meanings are used in>- the present study:Aphthous Ulcers (Figure 1) is a diseage characterized by\n4\n1.\nIus Ulcer on the Lateral M rgin,6f, t\nI //,/painfulval ofroun., recurrent si gleor miltiple ne rp i\n- I..uicerations,/6mUco'sal tissiley.th g ay, membrane, regular argins,\n. ' ,, A4\n/and surroundby bright, disc ete, thin erythematous r g.\n/tFlItther/A1stration may be pen in Chapter IV, cases 4, 20 and 24.)\n2) is a lesion that appears as 6pen edges or 4heii&sis (Figurecracks over the ski on either or both sides of the mouth, They are\n V0\nigure 2.\n/Cheil sisoil Both Coers;of the Mouth.\nPai ful,}hoist and tvexed by whiLa atm.\n/ep theli7sw lls, thiceni, and bes inf lam\nS3,lustreTilay_be seein Chapte\n1.-- CyanmethemIglobin ; rocedure\nithe metod/dmplloyednhe: usefIthe tio-Dyncs Co orimeter in order to det tmine c c lations of\nThemoglobin levell, and is considered to have a high degree,f Iccuracy.\nI.'{13-14); This rjrocedure requires a sample of 15 microlite s ofcased4,0\nSul:rou ding(41******60d (29). Nfurther\n. 1blood which is then mixed with a solution containing potassium\ncyanide, potassium ferricyanide, and sodium carbonate/4\nA\n 8'1.I\nferricyanide converts the,hemoglobin iron from ferrous Itoferric\nstate to form an oxidized home- combined with globin to Form. methe-\n)'\"Moglobin, which then combines with potassium cyanide to produce\nthe stable pigment cyanmethemoglobin.\n.Dysphagia is difficulty in swallowing, that is caused by\nulceration or hyperkeratosis of the esophagus (29).\nFerroud,gluconate is an iron supplement which Produces rapid'\nhemoglobin regeperation in patients with iron - deficiency anemia.\nIt is better tolerated thn'Other forms of iron because of its\n1low ionl.zation constant and solubility. It does not interfere,0with pr1oteolytic or diastatic activities of the digestive system,\nand will not woduce nausea, abdominal cramps, constipation or\ndiarrhea ithe.gfeat majority'of patients (26).\nGloss t s'is an acute or chronic inflammatory.disturbance of\nthe tonguwhich can ecome painful, bright red in color ncl,w1\nvarious d gre ofypertrophy (29). (III stration may be see inr\nChapter\n/\nIHema\nvolume o\nhemoglo\nasI\n/terminatiom ifs a iprocedh,re used to/determ\nocetes,i and t10: AeMatocrihemoglobin deermi/natiotj(2),f(22(24).1\nis anon-beari ig pro, ein w iichnormallyrbloodtwo forms:oxyh6mogibbin, chief y izand reduced hemoglobin, chiefly in venous blojod. \\designa.a high,nq'rmal,:41\n/the')\n/\nrateshate been un versall a\nthtrcu\narterial\n..rHemoglob ie ermnationis carried out by comparang a frefh\nfblood with a standard set of color representing,different,\n, .11 0\n0\n4A\n I4intensitIesAarhemoglobin color. A color index showa'the amount of\nhemoglobin in proportion to the red.blobd cell count Under normal\nconditions the number of red-cells in each cubic millimeter of\ncirculating blood remains almost constant. Daily'variationsof\none-half million cells are normal, and gieater transient increases\nmay occur during stress. The hiemoglobin content, expressed in\ngrams per 100 ml. of blood, nozlmally increases in direct proportion I\nto the rise in erythrocyte count. 'or production of hemoglobin;\nan adequate supply of iron is required.When there is inadequate\nproduction of hemoglobin,/gne cause ilithefailure to include\nsufficient iron in the' diet.\nIron-deficienc anemias a term used to describe,moderate and\nse there is insufficient iron,..tomalie severe iron deficiency/\nnormal quantities_of\nRena la\nrie,10n Ora\nanti-inflammatory,-temporary reliefPlummernintipru\nsymptbin.a synthetic corticosteroid which p ssessep\nitic and antiallergic action use fbe.\ns of aphthous ulcers..\n,roma is characterized by atroph\n,papillae and bad spots n th4 tongub, pain/ithe tongand oral\nmucosa,difficLltin sllaaing, ac6ompanie by mouthlcers and.\nCeflosis.\nISutton's Di 4ase jiigures 3, 4is a's ndrome which beginsd\n. i/as a small,smooth,pa nful red nodule or plaque which soon ,u1-\nIaerates.Thekraterl painful ulcers are much larger and deeper;\nand heal much slower than aphthous ulcers, and leave s4 rring (33).\n(Further illustration may be seen in Chapter IV, Case 1\n.11\n 10\\\n\"Mk\n47-\n4Figure 3.Crke Ulc Disease onhLowder Lip\n4\n.3.\n .0.me\netat4\n.Figure 4.Extensive Ulcer of Sutton' s$on theUpper Lip. .\n.. .es,-\n.' Tetracycline Mouthwash is primarily bacteriostatic treatment for lb:certain gramrpositive, gram- negatife organisms, and used as.prescrip- ..\n:. -oN . , tion for temporary relief of mouth ulcers (26) .' :s\n13\n.41.\n .,.. ,... . -body, cOmPared with the indili,idualis iron requirement's.It is only'`f''\n... , \\.-Y%t., 1.\\.40when iron depletion;. has been o,' long standing that *manifestations such\nX4. ' ..;.,\n'\n..,'els,glOssitis, .Wularp,stomatitis and esophageal adhestads-(Plummer-\n. , :- ..-\n.CMPTE2, II,\n.REVIEW OF I.,J.TFRATUFE\nThere are stress periods, doring life when body iron requirements\n.\\are in\"cremedi-eisting. iron-stores are 'rapidly depleted;and a- Zs\" ,4deficient diet soon produces iron deficiency. Depletion of iron\nstores is reconized as the earliest phase of- iron deficiency. As\niron deficiency occurs, iron stores are exhausted before Lyn-,,deficiency anemia appears.\n.'.Iron-deficiencv alemia is the xesult of a deficit in available.\n'iron,Aron a_soibed from thep;diet/ plus iron reserves within the\nVinson §yndromee) occur (5)*.-:the object of iron .0erapy is to provide .1.r%onsin an available\nform and tin adequate amounts to 'correct the defioiencpailability of ingested iron is related toits solubiliiy.a4 its\nreduced state. Ferrous salts are considered. to have *an'\\ absorption4 .rate of 10 to 15 per cent in usual treatments given to anemic..or\niron-deficient patients, and sihce they have $roved effective at lo!tw\ndosages, they have received wide use.Ascorbic acid is the one substanceWhich has been shown to,increase Iron absorption. for this reason, some investigators have-1\n #130\nacombined iron with ascorbic arid for treatments given. ,ColeMan,\net al (5) believe this tobe or little practical value however, A\n..because of the efficacy of iron alone. 'Results of adequate therapy\nare highly predictable, and effectiveness is usually determined 'most\nefficiently from the rise in hemoglobin (5). Although blood ualues\nreturn rapidly to normal, iron therapy must be continued for\nextended periods of time in order to reconstitute the iron stores ,\nin,the tissues.As. early as'1893 Blankenstein (19) suggested that the signifi-\ncance of iron-deficiency anemia may be important in the diagnosis. of\nclesions of the oral cavity. Suzman,(32) in 1933, reported an inves-,tigation.of the etiology of Plummer-Vinson Syndrome and its relation\nship.to \"idiopathic .hypochromic anemia\". He acknowledged that\nthe relaiioniip between anemia and 'the syndrome \"had alwayS been p\nsubject'of contention \". In 1938 Waldenstrom (34),expressed concern\nothae'the study of.so-called hypochromic anemia and syuptpms afflic-\nLing epithelial tissues had not-aroused much interest.\nDarby (7) reflected in 1946 that recent interest in viCamin M\ncomplex deficienRies.ascauses of lesions of the budtal eissfies had\nled to the unjustified claim by many investigators that all such\nlesions were manifestations of vitamin deficiencies. It was claimed\n,that 'changes in the lingual papillae were specifically due to niacin\ndeficiency, and that glossitis was probably due to chronic niacin\ndeficiency.It was airther implied that fissuies at the angles of\ntlse mouth (ckleilosis) were due to rihoflavindeficency, although it\n''had been shown that these. lesions may heal.after administration of15\n r.14\nniacin, pyridoxine or iantothenic acid; or'lhat they may be resis-\n..u4.I;tant to treatment with all of the known vitamin B factors. Schour\n.. t1and Massler (2.8) conclude from their studi4 of 'the effects of r-A\ndietary deficiencies oral structures that, \"The oral manifesto- . .,tions of iron deficiency have, been given much less consideration\nthan those of calcium deficiency and merit investigation.\"417\nSuzman (32) studied eight cases of Plummer- Vinson Syndrome athe'Massachusetts General,Hospital over a period of two years. The'',\npatients were all women between, the ages of 27 and 61. Clinical yl\nfeatures mahifested by these pati9ts-were: burning, red tongue\nr.twhich appeared atrophic, smooth and shiny, with fissures present.at-\n.the anglIs of the mouth; and dysphagia (tightness in thd esophagus).\nSix of the patients were found to have hemoglobin concentrations\nwhich ranged from 35 to 60' ,Pr cent at the initial examination.\nThese six patients were given a prescribed daily treatment'of iron\nwith ammonium citrate in concentrations ranging, from 3.8 grams to\n11.6 grams.Treatments were continued for 'Periods' of time ranging\nfrom one to two months. ,'Final data were available \\for four of these\nsix patients whose hemoglobin concentrations were found to have\nincreased fromp to 30 per Cent. Their overall physical conditions\nwere improved, and there was marke improvement in the conditiong of1.the mouth and tongue.Suzman (32) reported a seventh patieit who w s found to-have.\":marked'anemia,-and a hemoglobin concentration of only 15'kt Cent.\nThis patient was given intramuscular administr ionof*O'frig, of\nferric citrate over a period of three d ,and thdb a.geocond adminis7\ntrationcif 1600 mg. over a. period of fou days.Twentyyg-after the't\nV 4,\n 15\n,second course of iron, hemoglobin Concentration had increased 18'4,4\n'per cent, and marked improvement ofthe'lips.and tongue were observed. .'The eighth patient, studied by Suzm'an died on the sixth Olty, afterthe- filiform tiougie which was used for relief ,of' ayspagis was caught .ina fold of;mucous membrane, perforated.it, andi-then passed through'the-',esophageal wall.\n..\n-. Surman concluded that since the admi.iistration.of large amounts\n- Of iron almostinvariably relieves the anemia, andusually.alleviates 'at.the'letions ofthe tongue and mouth, then a virtual deficiency of do.iron May playsome part in the etiology, of Plummer-VinsonS);ndroMe, 45,anemia, glossitiS and dysphagia.WaldenstrOm's studies' (34) support lizman.He reported,somg..., - , clinical observations of symptoms frogthe epiihiOalorgans \"'= probably caused by iron deficiency. Waldenstrom observed sevenh cases, all showing typical Plummer-yinson SyAdrome. All cases, werefemales whoge,,ages ranged from 17 to 5.2 years: 'Patients Presented,,\n.t..4':.. .symptoms which included fisiures at 'the angles of the mouth, burning,\n, L..' and soreness-of.the tongue, and'dysphagia. Blood hemoglobin levels.-\n. were observed to bebetween 25 .per cent and 60 per cent. ,-,,Patients 'who were treated with ferrous lactate Oom two to seven weeks shoWedmuch improvement on subjective :symptoms, and hetoglobin values* were\n. -increased:He never, usedany treatment' other than iron, and always - ..\n-experienced good results.4,I=a. 4.. . ., Waldenstrom reportedobservations of seven additional:cases, ail..,- .14/\n°t \"14,. of whom showed typical koilonychia, with or withok Manifestations of\n1 fissures at 'the angles Of the mouth,sore tongui and dysphagia, -and._. with or without anemia. He concludedthat it seemsvery probable thatr 'a.17'\n -\nAIS16\nall of thesevarying combinations of symptoms inthe 14 patients,both with and .without anemia,have-one common cause: -iron deficiency.All cases iMproved,after iron medication.'0.pDarby (7) critigized Waidenstrom'sconclusidhs since 'he did not.remonstrate that his cases were resistant to treatthent with the vita-.\n,\n;min B- complex. Darby suggested that the patients may have consumed a\n..more adequate diet ddring theperiod of iron therapy, and therefore--' 4 r. /may have,overcome a concomitant deficiency through manifestations of .glossitis and cheilosis', for the association with hypophromic anemia,may have been due tie) an accompanying deficiency of vitamin B-compleX..'..4Darby (7).iilempted,to present, evidence that atrophic lingual ;papillae, glossitii and.angular fissures which acconipany.iron-defi-. .ciefigy anemiasare often due:to the lack of'iron alone, and not tothe iccomAnying,deficieficies of vitamin B-complex.- Darby reported.a, Study of six,, cases , encountered at the NueritioryClinie of the..-\n, .D epartmentof Medicine of Vanderbilt' University Hospital. Patients ,.r7% ,,+' . ,:at the Clinic; esagiCl'alliveimen, usually, present therecurrent .oral 1't:I signs; and other symptoms)ofeen diagnosed a, \"subclini cal B-complel.deficiency \", but they fail to respond to therapy with B-vitamins. 't,t\n1 It was because of. this observation thatTarby'initiated the study' of..;t.\n0\ni1.\n1 1the gases she reported. The B7coMplexsyrup. Which tle-p.rescribed in :-\n..1 some cases contained 25 mg..niacin, 1 mg. of,trihoflayin and:\" mg.1 . ...I\nOf thiamine,,tp .4 cc., ,,. ..All six cases studied by Darbywere women b etween the ages -of 24,>.rvi.._ ., and 38.Their hemoglobin levdIs at the initial' visit to the cp.hic. , 4. 'ranged b4ween 8.2 and ,2.2 g/100ml of4blood.All cases presented'18N\nO\n 17),\nsymptoms of oral disturbance related to Uummer-Vinso Syndrome,\n.., . .,including glossitis, chei osis, and aphthous ulcers Two patients e.\n,.,exhibited diagnostic dysphagta. Patients 'Complai ed of sore mouth;\nsore.and`burningtongue, ,and fissures at the a les of the mouth.v.1, .All_patientsexhibi4datrophy of thepapill of. the tongue.4),In twoDarby's'cases, B-domplex s (4 .cc, three times\nI. daily) was the first prescription given. After eight to nine weeks\ni ,.% ..,there, waS no improvement in oral condi ons of either-patiat\n. 1\n,,i ;:.,. 7 Tatienx number one was given the add Jona], presc'ription of riboflavin.,(.....(5, mg. daily) ,and there was no amp ovement after three weeks. Then,-\npyrIdox ne (50 mg., three times d ily) was, added to this patient's\nmediCat\" on and within two weeks he lesions improved. The pyridoxine'._)was discontinued at this time, but fissures at. the anglesi,of ,the mouth'<\n.4reappe. red and:Aid not resgo to-administration of'12 graea, of, Yeast,O\n-threeImes daily.Patientnumber one aria number two were both\ngiven O.g of ferrous su\none was given the fer-rofate,, three times ,daily: Patient number\nsulfate in addit,ion'to the B-Complex syrup.\n, .Patient,two was given the ferrous sulfate in addition to the... -g.. .. -..yeast.Three weekA'one month later, these two-patients had no\n,.,soreness of the mou ,the tongue wa.s normal, and the hemoglobin\nlevels N'ad.risen f om 10.5 g to 12.5 g. After the iron therapy, both\npatients remaine cured.\nIn case nuer three, the prescribed treatment was rbur mg. of\nriboflavin'adm nistered subcutaneously for foal days.Oral condi-\n)tionsremai;leunchanged.Then, supplements oE.dried breVer's'yeast\nwere prescribed (30 g, three times daily), and after six weeks there19\n 118,\n,- r\ns 4was no change.Troamentwithpyridoiine (1.6 mg. daily) wab%initiated.\n4-'for one week. There was again no improvement. Yei:4t,thevapy,was..:added for a period of two weds, and still there was'no'chauge in.',.. -oral donditions. Then ferrous sulfate-(0.3g, three timesdaily) was\n.; ...administered' for one month. The hemoglobin level increased' from 9.8 g\nto 14.0 g, and the patient showed prompt relieffrom the symptoms of\nPlummer - Vinson Syndrome.a\nPatient number four was given treatment with 0.3 g ferrous\n. 4sulfate, two times daily, together with 5 mg. of riboflavin adminis-teredthreeetimes daily. kfter One month, the oral lesions had com-... e\nIA..\n'.,pletely healed, and the hembgl$bIn had increased from 9.'1 g to,13.0 g.,The diagnoSis.of'this patient had been that of ariboflavinosis, with...-.1.coexisting -iron defic ency: It was thought that the respon$e of oral\n_____.t..,, -,...lesions was due to'riboflavin. This case illustrates further the\neonfusiOn which mayrlse when two therapeutic agents are used..\nDarby insisted that agentp:mustie tested separately, if accurate\n, 4\n. .-. ... .interpretations are to be ' gained. .,\n1... 1..., ,.The two -remaining- Vatients,-4bet$ Eli/6 And six, were treated'\n..with ferrous sulfate (0.1 g three. times daily) alone. Ireatment was\n.inot preceded with administration 0 8-vitamins in\"ordet! to determine)\n, ,1 V,whether the patient mould respond. to this. agent alone. Atter one to .\n,...two months, the patlients.laerecdvietel:y.asymptoinatici ,andhemoglobin\n\\levels had increased from a low.of'5.1 g to a hi h of 13.5. g. e',0. . . . 1(1:1\n, ._'parby:s report of representative stddi d was interpreted by-him as indication' that irondefici,pncy-along may manifested by\nfissures at'tlie angles of the mouth and glossitis. He belieVed that*20\n4%-.....\"-'?\"1\n r\nCI\n.19\n,this injterpretat on was culs1,1Lut. with Suzman's successful treatment\nof 4 cases of P mmcr-Vinson's Syndrome with iron adWnistration, and\nwith Waldenstro conclusion that these lesions of the mucosa and\nthe dysphagia a e both .cured by administration of iron with no other\ntherapy.\nDarby 4,an w d that these lesions are often confused with the\n__oral signs of B-complex deficiencies, as was evidenced by the there -\npeutic measures which were first instituteil in several of the cases he\nreported.He continued the StUdopof each of his subjects over a long\n4 1'* enough period of time; however, he was seeking to be convinced that\nthe B- vitamin preparations were ineffective, and that. the iron therap\nalone wase<Active.Darby did not deny that-deficiencies of ribb-\nflavin, niacin, or other B. complex factors may giVe risesto:glossitis\nor pheilosis.His emphasis was simply the another cause of these\n..1)signs is iron deficiency. These tindiprompted Darby to initiate\nthe study of,thecorrel n of these oral manifestations and the\nhemoglobin-levels of the general adult population. His assumption\nwas that there was more frequent association of these'signs with low5\nhemoglobin levels, than with high hemoglobin level;.,\nIn more rectot years, Vogel (33), Jacobs, et al (17), Burtocid\nDurovic (8), and Mahili (23) have. made references to anemia aea'\nr. causal,factbr in the diagnosis of these oral maladies,, but there is\nno extensive or structured review2nCcase studies allailab such-as\nthose conducted by Suzman,,Waldenstrom and Darby between 1933 and\n44,41946.At the present time the actual cause of the manifestations of\naphthoUs ulcers glossitis, and chyllosip In the ;!)ral cavity, ,andthe\nrecommended therapy for their con4rol re ain controversial;\nA..a\n4<\n Im\n, 1CHAPTER IIPROCEDURES\nAfter the problem was selectedstandard \"Project Review Form, Committein Research, University of Florida\"wasadejlatelyNefined, theon the Use of Human Subjects\nompleted and submitted, and.approval was given for this experimental nvestigation.Delimitationsand limitations were specified, h potheses/were established,, and termsused were defined. 1 available literatur related to inveqigations\n, of the significance iron deficiency in the manifestations of,\n,lesions Of the oral ciri y wai studied-and reviewed as a backeround ,for the study.\nSelection of Subjectsednvestigator accepted'appropriate subjects for participalisiit.,. 'in the pregent stpay during the four-year period from February 1970_,,_.\n, -.4,, tiftiOrch,104, .'Anexiended period of timewas requited tpt com- ,..-:-\n..pletfon 5fglis experimental iuvestigationbecause of sporadic\n. 'availability of appropriate subjects, and the need 'for continuation ! .0'\nof observations over an extended period.of time.Need for-additional subjects led to posting of notices instrategic places at six multi-purpose buildings on'tbe University ,ofv..,,- Floiida campus in eFly 1973.these notices fnaudpd dirammatiCs14tches of the,tylies:Of oral lesions which'subieatmay 4V22\n20prese14 in\n 'order'to be considered as participants. Interested potential subjectswere requested'to contact the investigator by telephone ;,in order toconfirm an ap pointment yith the consulting dentist in the Clinic ofOral Medicine at the College of Dentistry of the Univers ofFlorida.' Potential subjects were also inforined that diagnosis andtreatment would be provided for them at no -cost,if they were selectedfor participation in, the study.A sample form of the notices whichwere posted appears as Appendix A.Approximately 25 volunteer subjects responded to the postednotices.An additional59 potential subjects were patients who werereferred to the dental clinic by practicing dentists and physiciansthroughout Florida. Each of these, 59 patients was'examined by thedentist in attendence'at the. ,clinic, and screened for poss-ible Oar- ,\n'..ticipation'as Subjects'in the present study. Volunteer subjects whO ; ., :. * - V. responded to.the posted notices wereurged to make\"appointments fop Itheir initial screening.examination without delay if oral lesionswerepresentlsothatclinicalobservationcouldbemadeof,th'e'ulcera Ltive stages-which are of variable duration. Critical' judgment in Ole%\n-;. .ultimate selection of all subjectswas made'by li:R. Stanley, D.D.S.;s Chairman, Department of Oral Medicine, and his associates at the-, .7, , ., '\" ,. dental clinic. As a result df.the examinatAiVs, it Was agreed that a.\n., ...) ,,totel 4c)45.subSects-Coilla be considered' appropriate for participation .- .4\" .'in the present study.Attrition of potential subjects occurred because of,natural,mbbility, lack of motivation to return, to the .clinic, after relief of-.pain or acute symptoms as a result of the initial visit,tions, because of other illness-,,,involvements, and inability to return23\n '1P\nlyl 22\nt-o the.clinic ben se of tranportati n difficulties compounded by\nthd energy c f late 1973 and ea ly 1974. These attritionsreduced the final st dy sample to a to al,of 25 subjects who remainedfor inclusion in the xPerimental iavetigation.\n,.Each of t e'25 s ects selected for participation in the pretent1\n;1S'study was requ ted to complete and sign three.necessary release forMs.\nThe inve>s-t`fgatoi define and explained the study, and informed-the,subject of the right to ifhdraw from the project at any time. Boththe investigator d theubjecCsigned the University of Florida\"Infdrmed'Consene form, copy of which appears as Appendix B.. Thesubject was reques edfuri er to agree to -4.4e provisions, and signthe College of Den istry form, \"Photographic and Television Release\",4aocopyof. which appeart as Appendix C. The subject, was, asked tosign a third release form which aut4prizedthe collection of blood-11111010111.1.1.\nspecimens, and use of other' technical procedures which May ,be_con-\n7\";\"k46,' sidered necessary or advisable for diagnosis-and treatmenr.' This\n-..t...,third- release form is.a xpuiinb'inclusion of the official form,\nA°,*... IL -04C011ege Of Dentistry Admission Record, Shandy Teach?ng Hospital an,teClinics& University of Flori , and also inciudds a brief medical'\nhistory.All, completed. forms were'filed for official use and record\nIas needed.\nEach sib ects requested to return to the .dental clinic for a\nreevaluation of th e oral condition, preferably after a period of 30\ndrays.At the second visit to the clinic, the subject was informed,ethat another extensive oral examination would -be made, ,A second bloodsample woulbe obtained, and,a second hemoglobin level and hematocrit.24\n 4.t23\nreading would be determined. The condition of the oral'lesionsobserved at this second visit, and the iron levels in the blood wouldbe compared with the findings of the initial examination, and finalassessments would be made./\nSelectiOn of Subjects fur TherapyAt the initial visit.at the dental clinic, each subject wasgiven a complete oral examination by the dental cOnsultant In attend-ance.Close examination was mad for any signs of conditions which,, /...-..could be of such serious nature that fufther participation by7 thesubject Would be unadvised. In other situations, oral tis ues may\n.I have been traumatized through biting, careless-toothb hing, or upec'4 of topical applications such as aspirin or otherchQthicalq .WiaphrdfaY4\nhaVg caused 'burns. All such extenuating Possibilities had to be AEliminated so' Ghat there could be assurance that lesiOns manifested,Were nodue to these causes. Lesions resulting from mechanical causeswere noappropriate for purposea,of the present study. -1( kAtypicalconditions of the oral cavity were assessed according \"to severity and extent% It was the critical judgment of qe aittno:-otdebtaconsultant to make the ultimate selection of subjects for'ftub-sequ nt labOratory diagnostic procedures.\ncLabo atorylprocedures to which each subject was exposed inclOtd .moglobin level determination, and a packed red cell (erythrocyte)ca culation. (hematocrit). The investigator, a registered tedhnologist,p ocuied a'blood sample through the finger tip punattire method, andd termined, the hemoglobin level and thelematocritreading.As a result of the initial diagnosis which included integration4\n-- 25'\n r\nr.c0/\n24/°\nof,the idformati in obtained from the patient's medical history, the./0clini*.observation of oral' manifestations,` and the ;laboratory,findithe 'oral pathologist determined and selected those subjects'whoere to receive therapy. A total -of 13 subjects was selected for5t eatment. ,The priNary criterion for selection of subjects who\"-freeived therapy was the nature and extent of the oral lesions.. This4selection was made regardless of the hemoglObin level, whether it-0 could be copsidered normal, low-normal, or iron-defiCieboywanemia.,The he oglobin level Gras, a cOstgr4aft-'6f.secondarYimportance in' the4 s14onC171ubjects to receive' therapy. It was recognized that thestandard designation of hemoglobin level which may be Indicativeoiron-deficiency anemia Temains a controversial issue.\n.oSelection of Therapy\n,, Iron was chosen as the for- use to th/6 experimentalinvestigation, primarily because of the encouraging result's of earlierstudieshich were reported in Chapter II, \"ReView of Literature\".Suzman (3) used ferric citrate with success.Waldenstrom (34)ferrous lactate and reported ip-rovueot ok;ondltions of.his wients.Darby. (7) used Vitamin B-complex precedingttri'atmentswith ferrous sulfate, and reported that his patients showed no improve-. mentAmtil iron therapy was administered.'.\n= i'The therapy prescribed bthe dental consultant for 13 subjectsin the present investigatiob was-ferrous gluconail (320 mg:).. Ferrous\n'gluconate was selected as\"the iron therapy'of Choice because thissupplementdemonstrates effect§ 'readily, and is known to cause littleor no gastric 'disturbance (25).26t\n-15'\n 4\n0\nrIron deficiency is recognized as a most common dietary deficiency,\nwith. rhe possibilityof as much as 50 per cent of the population in\nmany areas suffering from this deficiency (6),'(30) :The-Aetican\nAcademy of Pediatrics has recently urged that childien should be fed\nI irotliortified milk to -help prevent the prevalence of anemia in this.I..country (9. ).The Food and Drug Administration is presently consid-A'ering a new regulation that-could triple the amount of iron supple-\n.4mentinow added to...bread and- flour in order to cope with the -reported\n,widespread iron deficiency 'in the'UnitedrStates (15).\n''.*.1 ,4.'._It has been postulated that the oral.lesion* investigated in the\ni.-... ..-\nprese ni.:.stueY are as extensive as'in iron deficiency.Since it hag\n.bepndemonstrated that there is 'a:possible relationship between'irore-\n. /-.,\n41.411elency and aphthou's ulcers/ it-seemed logical that more conclusive 1\n.data are needed,and that add tional efforps should be,made to demon-\n.,.\n'-,strate effects on the contsx f these a d other oral conditions ..0Ithrough.the use of iron the apy..\nDetermina.tioof Hem lo'ri Lev isI\nIInitial and `pal hemo, wet.IdeterMine4,by, the'\nBio-Dynamics Colorimer w ch employs, hecy yMdth lobin procedure'\n4117as explained, In \"Definition of Terms \", Chapter I. procedure\n.*proviges fqr calculations of hemoglobin leVelsreadinigs in grams.-per\nt \\ 1,100'milliliteis blood.DetyrmidAionols,hemaglOidn level in.\nI\"grams .per unitvOltme ofblooa was considered to be more accurate than\n1Or\\that of determinations ih per I, cent, asad been done in similar inves-....'\".\".......'tigations, When calculations are made h. percentages, 4 normgl value4,..------fyrepresenting 100 per cent must be es.tab ished.Assessment of thee\n,..._.\n.iv.,I\n27\n (al values'has been made with ranges frOm 13.5 g to 24.:2 ml\n1).For the purposes of this,study, it was accepted that. the per-\n4c ntage basis could imply a false sense,of accuracy, since a singlemple oE blood could render a heioglobin reading of a low of 61 perent or,high as 101 per cent.\nminasRecti'ons in thiS cyanmethemoglobin method of hemoglobin deter-on are fast and stoichi'dmetric. Use of .the Bio-Dynamics\nrimeter with the pre - bottled and accurately measured diluting Sub- /ance'reduces/the 'chance of error.The colorimeter provides formeasuring the color intensity,electrically, thus eliminating the\npossibility oD human error through the use of the eyes'in varyingintensities ofnatural or aiti icial light.\nThe hematocrit was used\nIand thus designate high, ncapilla4 pipet (85 micrp. determine the viblum of erythrocytes,l, or low hemoglobin letals% A micro-/iter4).wfilled t/ the three-fourths'level with the srubject s blood sample. The ,pipet wag then centrifuge\n,at atender(' high speed until maximal packing of erythrocytes\nobtained.The level of 136 ked erythrocytes 1.w read on a t;tand.iriscale, (which is.calibr Led foi the 85 micruliLr Tusual,range of values for c ed red cells for males is f om 40 to 54 Per\n.I\nI cent, and' for females,i from 35 to 47 per cent of the'.total 'bread\nsample.If any hematocrit value fell below the established viormal\n.0i.. valuesl erythrocytes,or packed ethrocytes, then i on-deficiency anemia could,be st,Pected.1\n,\nItcCollection and Trea me t of Data4.\nThe participation of 25 sub is in this experimental study28.\\ SL\n,r\n 27\nprovided th.data which are presented for observatidn,' summary, and\ninterpretations. These data were recorded-fo4 13 subjects who were,\nselected.by the dental consultant to receive ferrous gluconate\n.supplements during the experimental period; and for 12 subject who\nreceived no ferrous gluconate treatment.\nThe age and sex of each'gubject were noted, and individual\nrecords.were made of the initial and final status of each subject\naccording to:(1) clinical assessments of atypical conditions andtypes of oral lesions, according to severity and extent as designated\nby the consulting dentist; and g2) 'hemoglobin levels determined by\nthe investigator. Additional descriptive data were obtained at thesubject's initial visit to the clinic, when the dental consultantrequested the subject to describe his plesent condition in his own\n-words.The dental consultant made notations as the patient described\n1.14.s condition, and appropriate information was later recorded in\n1/ proper sequence.\n1All initial and final status'data were tabulated and-s marized\n.ti _f r purpoSes of comparison and interpretation in April 1974 P^1.^r7.o*nations of chair 'es in hemoglobin 4,ere to grt-n per 100\nmillilit rs of blood,'Snd assessments of any changes in^o'ral. condi-\ntions w re made iZ'simpledescriptive terms./dividual documentary records for each subject were summarizedfor inclusi, in the findings, and pertinent collective data were\n,/.I\nI\n,.\\.' presented in table forms for purposes of comparison. Ifiterpreta dons\n,\\\n..\\were made with particular reference to subjects whO rec Lived and did\n17* riot receive fer.ious gluconate supplements, and the apparent relation\nships between the hemoglobin level and periodic dt urr nte and i\n,-29' ..\n N.28\n.reduction of oral manifestations of aphthous ulcersglossitis and\nangular cheilosis. *From the interpretations of data,,,a summary of\nconclusions-and recommendations was made. r\n1'\n3O\naf rh.\nr\n 4\nCHAPTER IVPRESENTATION OF FINDINGS6.\n-Data which support this experimental ifivebtigation are reportedand presented intILpresent chapter. Findings' include the manifes-tations of aphthous ulcers, glossitis, and cheilosis in the oralcavities of '25 subjects, the effects of ferrous Aluconate therapy 'onthe control of these lesions in selected subjects, and the initialand final readings of htmoglobinlevelsofall subjects possible.. The types of oral lesions manifested by the 25 subjects accordingtosex and age distribution, and the summary of hembglobin readingstogether with assessment of oral results are given in table form.Reports of individual case findings and observAtiorls for the.25Subjects are presenFed in descriptive, form in order.togrovide.supplementary/datainappropriate for4ahulatlope\n. .d\"Types of Oral. Ltsions 'Itanisted by...,c.ilje\"25 :3 likrigla't7a6' AIn Table 1 is .presented 'a summary of, the sex ,and age distribu- ,.-. . -. tion of the 25 subjects, and the types of oral lesionspianifested7\nratthginitial visitto the dental clinic._ nspection_ of Table 1 .0.shoes a 'predominance of keinale.1.,represents 80 per cent; of the,`-:- experiTental study( %di. obsofsubjects,a,total, of 20, which\n25 subjects participa.tinginthis\nervad that a /total. of 1,0_,Ar thee\n. fefe-ale. subjects (90 perdent)ace. within.-.31\".,,, . ,,the\"age-groups nor, ,'.\n9\\ 0\nIgtF\n7\n a1.\n30.\nTable 1a'\nTypes of Oral Lesions Manifested by the 25 SubjectsAccording to Sex and Age biscributions\nAgeGroupsOral Lesiots -13-2425-34'35-5455-75TotalrwMM- FMF.M'FSubjects\n_AAthouS Ulcers- 15110' 20010\nGlossitis 0O002013Gheifotis 0',0'0'0'01001Ohthous Ulcers/ 0losSitis0001001\nApbthoOs Ulcers/ 0'00'0' 2002Cheilosis\nGlossitisfi 00-00CheilofisAphthousrUleers/ 0001,i'iUdheilosis/.Glossitis2\nSutton's I!lisease 2100\n0r3.\"\"--..\\1\n0\nVitals 36'2210100225.'9\n3g1\"\nA\n f,exceeding 54years,This greaterProportion of female subjects.presenting oral lesions may have been associated-with the greater,\n. laanemic , -tendency of femalesto becomAuring the childbearing yearsti because of the regular loss of blood trough Menstrual flow.P... Acceptance of this premise may be just fied if :itcan be shown:that\n1the hemog obin level in the blood is related to the occurrence o.f k'the oral lesions.\nFurtherinspection of.jable1 reveals that the type of oral\n. lesion-pre9ented by subjects most often was.that of aphthous ulcersonly, as was manifested by a total' of10 subjects (40.per cent).taien additionalsubjectswho manifested aphthous, ulcers together' .''with glossitis and cheilosis are included in the .designation.bf..subjects presenting aphthous. ulcers, the total Dumber of subjectsmanifesting this type'of oral leslon isincreased to 14, or 56 per-cent of 'the total 25 subjects I-\n..Report of Case Findings ...Theclinicalfeatures andobservation0 of each-individuai t, , % ..f,,,subject of thetotal 25 subjects are'eaemaiamtvn the followink,..,A.e.: pages.. I,--,k I.\n..,.. . &se 1.A 22-year-oldfemale volunteer fimt came to the. ....dental clinicon January 30,;1970 with thelcomplitia of 41 long'6.1. history ofaphthous ulcers.At the time of her first examination,'threelesions were observed which were inflamed%-and she reported\n.1 thaey were causing her much distress.Laboratory.findings I\n.. showed thatthe hemoglobin level was 12:10 0160,m1,*andrthe , -. is .. hem tocrit reading'vas 36,00 per cent (row nokmal for females).I33\nI\n .32:#\n,. The treatment recommended was ferrous gluconate (320 mg.) tablets\ntwice each day for 30 days.. The subject left the vicinity and did\nnot respond to a letter requesting her to return to the clinacifor a\nsecond-observation.\"She responded to a telephone call made by the\ninvestigator in February 19K. four years later, and she returned to\nthe cl nic on March 6, 1974: Oral examination at this second visit\nI)\nindica ed that she had not beeq bothered with,any disloinfoit forroveal arlormal'oralcaviity with no oral lesions. The subject,\n'foyer six mqnths. kaliemr hemoglobin le'vel at this second visit was 15.3..4, %g/100 ml.and the.hematocrit was 46.0 pei cedt (high normal range).\nThese findings show an increase in hemoglobin level of 3.3 g/I00 ml,\n;,and an increasein the hematocrit of 10 per cent. The subject cow-\n: . frtinues to take one iron tabletevery three days.\nCase 2.Th.d subject was a 22-year-aold female volun eer who\ncamety the clinic January 2, 1972 with a history reculllrrent\n1phtlous ulcers. At Ohe time of her first examination presented\n.numb rous lesions in the oral cavity, both on and under the tongue.\nShecomplained of great distress. Her hdmoglobin level was .1147\n,t..0100 ml,laria the hematocrit was 32.4 per cent (below u'sual normal\nrange).The dental consultant prescribed KenalOg in OrabaseAOr'\ntemporary'relief of symptoms, and 'recommended, therapy with ferrous .4giiconate (320 mg.) tablets twice each.day for 30,dayS. She\nreturned to the clinid on February 6, 1972, The oral lesion per-\nsisted, and her second hemoglobin readitag was 11.9 g/100 ml and\nthe.hema.tocrit was 35.7 per cent. Results 'of these. laboratory tests .\ncr 't't4 .demonstrated an increase of 0.7'g in the hemoglobin levels and an\n. . .....increase of 3.3 per cent in the hematocrit. In interview, she was,-'34\n 33\nevasive aboutfollowing insructiou6 for the medications prescribed. She was asked to return to thtt:inicwithin twomonths. -She' MPved away fromthe vicinity before she mad ;\"thethird visitto the clinic. In January1974 shewas sent a letter rOquesting herto return tothe clinic.She did not resprond,and'a telephone callwas placed to her Palm Beachdence.. Sheindicated-that h6r condition wps'uo better, and that her hemo.4- , glcbin levelwas \"below normal\" in September1973.She statedthat she was no longerfollowing the,iron therapy prescribed for her atthe dental clinic.No furtherinformapion wasavailable fromthis subject.Case 3.The subjectwas a 24-year-Old male volunteerwho came into e.I the dentalt-clinic on Octobpr 30, 1974, complaining ofhaving suffered\n1)almost continuously, from a0 thousulcers fr several years. At the timeof his initialoral, examination two small lesions were observed which he said were causing himdistress.His, hemoglobinlevel was 15.0 g/100 631 0 and his hematocrit was 42.0 per cent (low normal range). The dentalcon-.sultant-recoMmended thathe take,one ferrousigluconate (320 ,mg.) tablet4 threetimes a day for 30 days.He returnedto the clinicNovember 27,-4973 withno oral lesions, but stated that hehad enduredrecurrence' ofonq ulcer since his last visit. ;# His hrwoglobtn level, at thi% secondv sit4as recorded a't15.5 0100imland the hematocrit was 44.0 per cent. T ese,labpratory resolelk revealed a 0.5g increase in the hemoglobin level anda 2.0 per cent increase in the hematocrit, which is considered well withinnormal limits., He was askedto return to the clinic within 60 days. 1He) Old notrespond to theletter sentto.him.in January 1974.A'telephone 4.11vas made to him in late February.He ipdicatedthat he wasbetter,and that he did not have thA,oral lesions as often. The investigator was Unable toprocure another hemoglobin determination.ti3.5_\n t\nI\nt,34\n.. Case 4.Thisubject was a 31-year-old female voluntee,e. who. ,reported to the clinic on April 11, 1973, complaining of Manifesta-tions of aphthous ulcers (Figure 5), glossitis (Figure 6), andCheilosis (Figure 7). I\n'll\nFigure 5.(case 4). Aphthous Ulceron OralPapilla of Stensen's Duct\nit\n36;1\nii\n;1\n?\nft,S\n 35\nFigure 6.(case 4).Beefy-red Tongue ofGlAttiswith Angular Ch ilosis\n370\n 436\nFigure 7.(case 4).Closeup View of Angular Cheilosis\nDuring the oral examination several aphthous ulcers were observed\nwhich appeared ulcerated and inflamed.' She complained that her tongue\nWas burning.She had deep angular lesions at the:corners of'her mouth.\nThe subject reported a history of miscarriages, and in March 1973 her\nphysician'had diagnosed anemia. She stated that she frequently suf\nfered-from these oral lesions. Her hemoglobin level at this first\nvisit was 12.5 g/100 ml. There was no hewtocrit determination.\n38ve 0\n 37\nFerro sglucon3te (320'mg.)1 tablets were prescribedthreel timesa day\nfor 30 d .She returned to tlle clinic on May 7, 1973.She presented.\nno lesions,r..d reported that slie had not felt so well in years. Her\nhemoglobin le el was 15.0 g/100'ml,demonstrating an increase of 2.5 g.\nThis subject may have enduted iron-deficiency anemia since she showed\nwhat can be considered a high intake of iron during the 30 day period\nCif the ferrous gluconate therapy.Although her first hemdglobin level,\nof 12.5 g' /100 ml could be considered wich.41 normal limits,accord*\n, 1I..to somestandards,-the rapid uptake of itOnNand prompt disappeararwe\n.... ,.., ..'of the orai'lesiows could indicate that the Wemoglobin' level was sub-\nnormal for her, and that she did 'indeed resent a mild case of anemia.\nFurther, when these firidings are compar d with thosd of case 3, 'we\nfind that the initial hemoglobin 14vel was considered high at 15.0\ng/100,ml, yet when the same therapy Was prescribed for him over the0same period oftime, the hemoglobin increase was only .5 g.This\nconfirms'previous studies that show that a subject who.has 1 a higher,\nnormal hemoglobindevel will absorb iron at a much slower rate (11), (18).\nCase 5.The subject was a 32-year-old female referral who first,\ncame into theclinic October` 1, 1973 with a twoyear'history of Sutton's\nDisease. She presented multiple lesions of the tongue, lip,4ftd, palate..\nShe indicated that they were so painful that they had affected her\npersonality,She had becomeirritable and lepressed. tier hemoglobin.\nlevel was 11.5 g/100 ml at the initial visit to the clinic. .There was-\nno hematoctitdetermination at that time.The treatmentrecommended\nwas Tetracycline mouth wash and Kenalog in Orabase for immecliate.teth-\nporary reliefof sym2tomsThe dental' consultant recommended ferrous\nldp\n 38n\n00 gluconate (32U mg.), one tablet twice each day, and requestethat she\nreturn to theclinic within 30 days. She failed to return, and a\nletter requesting her to do so was sent inJanuary 1974. She returned\nto theclinic on January 23, 1974.Oral examination at this second\nvisit revealed one small lesionich was healing. The subje.ct indi-\ncated she felt much better, had expe ienced fewer and smaller legions\nand they had healed more promptly than, pteviously. 'Her husband\nremarked to the dentist that her personality had improved. Herhemo:j\noglobin level at this second visit was'13.3 g/100 ml, And her hematocrit\nwas 42 per tent (normal). It was recommended that she continue the\nferrous gluconate reatnent, and reduce the quantity to one tablet4rdaily.-Case 5 was the only cpse of Sutton's Disease for which ferrous\ngluconate was prescribed in this study.During the three -month period\nof observation,4y\n,the heMoglobin was raised 2.3 g, and great improvement\nwas seen in heroral\"tondition.1 These findings seem to indicate thatO'she may have suffere i from iron; -defitiency anemia.\nCase 6.The subject wa.tx a 3\"3.year-old female who was referred to).the clental clinic from the Watson Clinic in Lakeland, ,Florida on\nJanuary 17'i1972.She presented a 'two-year history of aphthaus ulcers.\nSeveral lesions were observed at this first: visit. The-investigator\nwas notpresent' to procure blood for hemoglobin determination. It was\nrecommended diat she use TetracyCline mouthwash and Kenalog in Orabase\nfor temporary relief of Pain. ''The dental consultant prescribed ferrous\ngluconate (320 mg.) tEeattTAIt', one tablet twice each day for30 days,\n(The subject report.fd by telephone on tebruary.1, 1972 thatall lesions\n As.39,Jr.\n,were healed.She h ad experienced one small lesion which she aborted\nwith Tejracycline mouthwash and Kenalog in Orabase. In January 1973\nsubject reported again that she wad grateful for relief of pain\n.and symptoms. -She indidata she-would continue the te)rrous gluconate\ntherapy because the lesions would recur without it.- .\naUseThq subject was a 36- year -old' female referred to. the*dentil clinic by a dentist in psivat'e practice in Gafnesville, Florida,\non May 6,-1971. She reported' h one-year history, o adhthous Ulcers\nand cheilosis;,.At the initial oral examination she presented lesions\nf /4,under the tongues and racks at'thAhglesof Che m6uth, 'Her hemoglo-\n.\n. , ...bin level was 12,0 g /100 ml recorded at the J. Hillis 'Vier Health\n.\\.Center.* illere was-no hematocrit procUred:. Thetreatmeqx\n,:..,,-1-recommende&\nShe wasthe cliniew4siferrous.:gluc onate (320,mg4-one tablet twice each day.\nasdto.return.,tethe Clinic a4et.fi,ye days. ,She.visited\nMay 21,-.1.971Netno improve4nt Wasnoted`in the condition of #,e.aphthous.ulcerS.' The eheiOSis was improved. She''re5urried t'o.,the.,_..,. --..-,.clinic again bn June.7; 1974',and presented'no symptoms.o6f.Ulcers c)\n..,theilosis,A lettqr was seat td. ber On ianuary 21, 1974. asking her., to\nreturn Co tke-clinic.jShe 'reported on:March 20,\"1974. She stated that\n-she'fei,so wel.l that she thoughti,t was a waste loUtiMe:to continue\nher visirsto the clinic. All bral tissue via. normal. Her\nlast.vigit was 13..5. g/100'*ri,\n,.fEase 7, whose:..hemogldhkaleVel was .12A,g71Q0..mr at the initial'\n..64,hemoglobin\n-\n.4,1.Niskt--te the CliniC,s.could,be'cbp.-side'red tollav presenCe& hemO,43:614m.7rea&ing wi Nthin.normallimis for her.', ..flopever, aftdr'dieferrl:tus\n4gluconilte therapy, the.hemoglObili level Was ipOreaed by:145.A-and the,, e t,A%condition'of her deal-cavity was.norma1.4 Wed,for additional\n.4%,\nI t,...VTti\n. .\n r\n1seaI\n40'\n#%.\nseems thiveloeen indicated by/the fidings._..Case 8.This subject was a 38 ear-'old female who was referred\nto the dental clinic on June 14, 1971 by,a entist in Dade,,City,\nFlorida.She reported a 15-month history of glossiti .At the\ninitial examination she complained that her tongue and throat burned\nand hurt,, and, that she had difficulty in .swallowing. Her hemoglOhlin\nlevel wag reported to be 12.2 g/100 ml, according to a_recent labora-\ntorytory report.The dental consultant recommended ferrous gruconateA(320 mg.) therapy, one tablet twice -each day. She returned to the\nclinic on June 28,-.71971 showirig no improvement. A letter was sent\nto her in January 1974, requesting'a return visit. She reported\nby'telephone that there was no improvement in her condition, but she\nfailed to return. to the clinic. A second hemoglobin level deIrmina-,'tion was not-made.Case 9s, The subjeCt was a 44-year-old female who was referred to\nthe dental clinic onOctober 15, 1970 with,a two year -history of .\nT* tmanifestations of glossitis and aphthous ulcers. .She-reported that\nshehad also had dicers in the vaginal area. Oral examination at the\nfirst visit revealed a fiery-red mucosa and tongue. She reported that\nshe hadno vaginal lesions at the present time. The subject com-plained that she could not eat.or use straws because of the pain.\nShe reported that she had difficulty in swallowing. Ferrous glu-\nt%cdnate (320' mg.) was recommended, one tablet three times each day.4\nA biopsy of the inside lower lip was recommended; if this therapy\nrfailed.The hemoglobin level at this, first was 12.0. g/100 ml. Her\nsecond visit was made on April 2, 1971, and she demonstrated marked\n.42\n 1\nimprovesent.She had taken the thr e ferrous gluconate tabletseeach day for two weeks, experienced marked improvement, and continued\nthe terapy for two months. At this tine she reduced the intake to\nAone tablet each day for a. period of 30 days and remained free ofs\nJesions.. The mouth became sensitive again, and oral, lesions reappeared.\nIv'She increased the ferrous gluconate supplement to,tjte originAl pre -.,\n111 e.scription of three tablets each day. She made tier last visit Co the\nclinic on February 25, 1974 in response to the followup letter sent\nto her in January 1974.The subject had no oral lesions prisent atIlthis time, and reported that1'she had been free of symptoms for three\nye'ars.She continued the ferrous gluconate therapy regularly, taking,\nonetablet each day, and increasing the quantity to two tablets each\nsday for four days during the period of menstrual flow. The hemoglobin\nlevel at her last visit was 13.5 g/100 ml, Showing an increase of 1.5\ng.E..It is noted.that case 9 is another subject whose hemoglobin level .7at the initial visit could be considered within normai'limits 'for her,\nand who demonstrated marked improvement in the oral condition, and\n--.rise in the hemoglobin level with the ferrous glumnatetherapy. ,It\n..is noted further that therapy had to be continued regularly in osder.\n.to prevent recurrence ofd symptoms.S.\n.Case 10.The subject was .a 45-year-old female who capeto the\n.\\dental clinic on tebrdaFy 13, 1970 with a history of Icheilosis.. 'Oral---,\n.;examination confirmed the diagnosis of angular cheilpsis.' The hemo-\nglobinlevel'at this first visit was '11.0 g/100.ml. There was no\n. .hematocrit taken. -Ferrous gluconate (320 mg.) therapy was recommended,,\n0 ...I .43..\na s...-.'\"..4 a;awe'l&,,,\n 42\nand the subject was'instructed to take one tablet' daily, with an '\nincrease in dosage up to three tablets eachday during the period of\nmenstral flow. Her last visit to the clinic was on January 17, 1974.She had no lesions present, and stated that she had learned that she\nhad to continue the iron therapy or her symptoms would. recur. The4hemoglobin level at this tice.was 13.8 g/100 ml, showing an increase\nof .2.6 g over the four-year period.kCase 11.The subject was a 46-year-old female who was referred\nto the clinic by her dentist on April-23, 1970. She reported a\nfour -month history of glossitis and cheilosis. At this first exaMina-tion,she complained that she was very tired and sleepy much of the\n'time,_that her tongue was sore, and the corners of her lips were .\ncracked.' Her hemoglobin level was 15.1 g/100 ml at this initial\nvisit.. Ferrous gluconate (320 mg.) therapy was recommended, one\n-tablet three times each dax for 30 day's. The subject tailed to.re,\nturn to the .clinic and did not respond to a' letter whl.ch reciu,ested\nhe to do so.A telephone call to her was made in March 191,% and\nshe indicated thar.she was feeling fine. She was convinced that her'oral problems had been caused by rough treatment given her by an oral-\nhygienist.The investigator was unable to procure a second hemoglobin\nlevel. 0\nIn case 11, the subject may'have bee'n accurate in her selfdiag-\nnosis, for her hemoglobin level of 15.1 g/100 ml was' of high normal\nrange at the first visit to the clinic. Case 11 was one of the three\nsubjects (cases 3, 11, 20) of this investigation whose hemoglobin\nlevel was 15.0 g/100 ml orhigher at the first visit to the clinic.44\n ,43\n4A secoul hemoglobin level determinati n may have revealed interesting\ncomparisons of conditions manifested.\nCase 12.The subject was a 53-yaar-old- female volun eer Who\n,'came todie clinic on June 8, 1972 reporting a one-month history of\n,---glossitisand swollen lips.. The initial oral examination revealed\na fiery -red tongue. The hemoglobin level.was 12.7 g/100.m1, and the,\nhematocrit was 38'.0 per cent. yarrous gluconate (320 mg.) was\nrecommended, one tablet each day for t'io weeks. The subject returned\nto ?the clinic on July 13, 1972. Her tongue appeared normal but her\nlips were still swollen. The hemoglobin at this second visit was\n/13.4 g/100 ml, and her hematocrit was 40.0 pel cent.She returned to\n.the clinic again on January 22; 1974. 4eroral condition wasnormal,\nand she indicated that.she felt-well. Her hemoglobin level at this\nthird visit.had dropped'to 12.0 g/I00 ml, and the hematocrit reading\ndroppecrto 37.0 per cent. She was advised to resume the ferrous\\gluconate therapy.\nIn case 12 it is believed that theto.itue condition Was probably\ndue to a slight iron-deficiency anemia, since it was rapidly resolved .\nthrough use oeferrous gluconate supplements.Without the therapy,\nthe hemoglobin level and hematocrit became lower than that which was\nrecorded at the initial ;Alit tJo the clinic.sz,Case 13.The subject was a 67-year-old female who was referred\nto the \"dental clinic with glossitis add theilosis of long .standing.\n,tier first visit was on April 12, 1971, when she presented a deeply.\n-creviced tongue, fiery-:red gingrva,band severe cheilosis. 'She\n0,.receivedprevious'treatments of vitamin and endocrine therapy,'.s45\n 141,\n.44\n.\nhemoglobi4level at this first visit was 10\n)hematoc'rit was,41:1 per cent. Ferrous glue7 g /10 'm1, and the'\nnate (320 mg.) was;prescribed, one tablet,I each day for two weeks\": Kenalog in Orabase\nwas presCribed for teMporary relief of symptoms. If there was no\nimprovement with the prescrij)editherapy, a'biopsy was recommended\nas a next, procedure in order that a more definite diagliosis could\nbe reached.She returned to the,clinic on April 30, 1974. She\nhad reduced the fgrrous gluconate supplement 'to one tablet each\nday.. The hemoglobin level at this second visit was 14.2 W100 ml,\n,,procured aCtlie J., Hillis Miller Health center. There was no\n,-:-hemlocrit determination. The 'hemoglobin-level'had increased 0.5 g. -., -.Case 14., The a 10-year, -old4m 'le who was mferred to\n.4- ,-1'14A ',.4 )-'',,. ,\n'.,:- .. .the dental clinic &rom-the\"J. Hillis-Miller Heal 1er'Centeon Mer4 0,.,, ...' '.''. v',0..1970 with:a long history of Sutton's Dgsedie. On7etxamilikaiion he.\n.,iptesented, multiple lesiofts Ihroughout the oral cavity. No.hemoglobin.*4. - Vs ..ievel waspdetisrmerted at this first visit. Steroids %prednasonel\n-40. .werewrescribed. ;Tile subject returned to the clinic on July 7, i'.70.$ v..t thin` ;timeiie\"presentedlone,fesi:op on the lower slip (Figure 8), .and.: .:- 4.s4. ; ... , otherNthan evidence orpoor oral hygiene,, tie seemed very.well. ,She . seemed.!, ,., 1, ,0...Atsteroid retfmen was'continuipgeand ttie subject showed no indication\n., ,. .o f.facialchange dueo'.; thesteroids other than.a.heavy lip etriZ., It.-,..,... . .that...was recommended&that he use de soft tooth brushnd that 'the carious.\n... 0teeth be restored as soon as possible. oche hemoglobitile vel at this 9 .' . .. i .second visit was lItleg/100,M1. There was no hematocrirt determitatibn. ,* 0.smade.He was requested to return to the cani6 *if' heiinct 'eny eurehter: e A/e\n. . . . . .tr.46s.,\n a4.,\nI\n4- gJr. . . Figure 8:'-(cas-e 14). Aphthous Lesion4 Associated with Suttod'i Dlsoa6'eAAtrouble.The subjectvturned to,th4 clinic on September 14, 1972Ir-\nwith recurrence of Sucton's.Disease Whi'h he had endued for aboUttwo months, following two years:ofrellef. His mouth was stillJacking in oral hygiene. .He had lesions' on the tonguelips and.4 ^floo.of the mouth. He was continuing; the prescribed steroids, andand of Tetracyclinmouthwash and Kenalog in. Orabase,bUt none of..,,., ,these seemed to relieve the conditions. He had severe gingivitis,\nand a mouth that was in.a general run-down condition. Scarring waS\n., ti observAd.No hemoglobin level was obtaineclas'the patient! was much\n.-\nAf47\n 4,.\n.46.eA 3,i .too ill.Steroids, antibiotics, Tetracycline mouthwash and thefuse .\n. . .. , .\n1.. 'Rf a\" waterlpick:were,prescribed. Thebject returned one wdek later1#,./ a*.\"'e\"'.''''.''On Sepieuper 204 1972, and examinat n showed healing lesions. The 44. . .,C, ..' 4 1 311101 % .2.....r, ............s..... l.. ''.--1.donth was in much cleaner con00.tioi3 The patient was not sent t the .,,labbratory for additional hemogrob determination. Itvias-rtraommets:1- 40.thatcontinue the steroids.-,...., .I. 0 ,.. ..AI.ItithAuld. be.noted that the ntal consultantprescribed steroids it-I-. ./only. because, of thejudgient tha benefits which may be gained exI____-to.-4e\nvc,'----or. o..., . . . oio'ceededitheNrisks which couM involved:. .,..,.. ,-.4.15., )f,Case 15.The subjecwas a 15-year-old female referred to the ,\n. et.% ,1'tot.' ,...-/:\n4.dental-clinic by herdentist.At kber Airst,yisit on bctober 6, 1973o a,'4( .e, ....she presented a long history of Aphthous ulCers. Oral examinations ' #\narone on the left cheek; and one on.the right cheek. The subject'revealed three 44 legions, on e on the left margin of the tongue, -\nreported that she had endured these lesions since She was three years.old, wit!' recurrences at least once each month. Her hemoglobin lev.1 .,..) r...'..at this first visit'was 13.7 g/100 ml.. There was no hematocrit deter,.,r\n..,minati6n,She was given a prescription forTetracycline mouthwash . 4/ .,.,% ,t,'andin Orabase; and requested to return 'to the' clinic after,\n...0.. .*..,Aone month.'She Aid notreturnto the cliniC until January /0, 19742At this second\"visit, she presented three small lesions:'She indicatedh that she- did not like the taste of the Tetracycline mouthwash,. andthereYore did not use it. The hemoglobin leVel at the last visit was12.5 g/100and the hematocrit was 34.0 per cent. There was adecrease in henibtlobin'of'1.2\nCase 16.This, subject was a .19-year-old male who was referred to\n 47\n.° the,clinic from the J. Hillis Miller Health Center on November 18, ..:1971.He reported a five-year history of multiple, deep,d painful. ''lesi,---ona_of the morh,andtOf the rectal and mnal regions. AL an -;'r\n--earlier date his 'Physician had prescribedsteroids for a brief time.;%,Sutton's Disease was the - diagnosis. Oral examination reveled severeaphthous ulcers, and the subject reported that he had,endured totalmouth_ involvement. 'The hemoglobin level et the first visit to theclinicwas 13.8-g/100 ml, as had been recorded on the medical record 't 4'tfrom the J. Hillis Miller Health Center. There was no hematocritdetermination recorded. TetracyCline mouthwash and .ltenalog in Orabasewere recommended for temporary relief of symptoms, and upe of a waterpik was recommended for maintenance and cleanliness. The subjectwas informed that steroids would be prescribed if he showed totalmouth Involvement again-; His mother reported on February 15, 1974that her sonwas no befter, but that she believed he was- no worse.a.. ThseHemoglobin level on February 20, 1974 was reported to be_ 12.9'g/100 ml, according to report from his physician's offite,irclampa.t This represents a decrease of 0.9 g in the hemoglobin level. -Femme 1.,.,,,-\n...3, . gluconate (320 mg.) was prescribed at this time, one tablet every dayfor. 60 days.He' was requested 'to return to the dental clinic afterthis period of time, which was beyond the extent of the present study.Case 16 presented symptoms of the classic Sutton's Diseise Syn-drome, and although no improveMent or deterioration of his oral condi-.\nS'4,tionrepofted, it would be interesting to, no the outcome of the6. ferrous;gluconate therapy-he is presently followin .Case 17. 1The subjec was a22-year-old female volunteer wh'./c;reported to the clinic on April 16, 1973. She reported that she had49\n 48\na a Asuffered from aphthous ulcArs for as long as she could remember. SheTresenbedl a giant lesion on the lower left lip.Her hemoglobin levelat this first vislit was 12.0 000 nil. There was nHematocrit deter-\n/urination.TetraoYeline mouthwash' and Kenalog.in.0 base Were prescribed\nl',., for temp rary relief of symptpms.The patient rest ned to ,t,21inic.1I on Febru ry 26, 1974, and presented persistent aph oussions.Shereported that she took \"iron-pills\"-during the int rmittent weeks ofi-taking birth control pills. Her hemoglobin level t this second visitto the clinic was 13.8 g/100411,'showing an increase of1.8 g/100 mlduring a 104 month period'. At this time, it was'recommended that shetake 14ine-4-,pay\" iron supplements. .She returned to the clinic onApril 2,1974. She presented no lesions, but reportedothat she had\n. suffered one legion recently. The hemiili. n level at this third visit ., 12,was 13.9 g/100 ml showing an increase of 0.1 g over, the past month.The hgmatbcrit aethis third visit was 3 .0 per cent. :Case 18: The subject was4a 22-year-old female volunteerwho\nIt,. a ,.., . ,.Creported a tyo-year history of aphthous ulcers. She, reported to the.... . ..clinic on November 2, 1913, and examination ,revealed onlesion on thelower lip.She reported that she had'a history of anemia. Her hemo-t\n. , globin level was 12;5 g/100 ml at this first visit. Kenalog in.Orabase:was prescribed. The subject reported in January 1974 that she felt v.better, and that she had no oral lesions. The subject revealed thatshe had taken oral iron supplements of.her own accord.. Ole subjecttnotretu4nto the clinic for a second hemoglobin determination.\n.. Case 19. The subject was.a 29 -yeajr -old male who was referred to -,.the dental clinic on March 3, 1973, with a 17-year.hiatOry,of Sutton's.5 0rm\n 01.l\n4\nIeg.His subsequent.vis4ts to the J..Hillis Miller Health nter indicatedDisease.Oral examination revealed multiple lesions on the lip anddeep into the pharynx. The subject reported that he had taken vita-.;minsand haehad smallpox inoculatiAns, but nothing he had done hadhelpd.Several areas ofscarring were observed. The hemoglobin 7-- , 4 10/Ilevel was 14:0 g7100 ml. Tetracycline mouthwash as prescribed. ,I\n411thatlhe tad no permanent` improvement. The investigatorcont ct the subject for a second hemogWn level.\nCase 20.The'. subject was a 28-ar-old male volunteer who fir tas unable toI\nrepo eed to the clinic on June 28, 1972 with a long history o'f aph\nthous lesions. Oral examination revealed a deep lesion on his'lip (Figure 9). The hemoglobin Levelwas 15.0 g/100 ml atiis st'vis t, and a hematocrit o6 43.0 per cent. The ubject stunned to/the dental clinic on November 7 1973.' Examination revealed-nolesions present at this tithe, and the.Subject indilked that he had\nhad no problems f or over a year. The subject revealed.'that hisdiet had been much improved. His hemoglobin level at .the last visitwas 16.5 eloo Ml, which shows a 1.5 g increase singe his initialvisit.The hematocrit was 46.0 per cent.at the final visit, showingan increase of 3.0 per cent.\nCiie 20 indicated that he became aware of the inadeqUacies of hisdiet, re- evaluated his eating habits, and proceeded to improve them.Hesrealized that, he was not getting.enough protein, and \"good, redmeat\".The government food stamp plan had enabled him to improve his\n, . . ....t. eatinghabits, and thereby improve his.bral,conditivn. . .\n.Cade 21.Thesubject was a 36-year-oldfemale Zreferred to the.\n-51\n NM,50\nFigure 9.(cale21).'Deep Aphthou6 Ulcer of the 1.4Wer 1.1.0\nclinic from the J. Hillis Miller Health Center on November 11, 196,and reporting a seven-yeir history of aphthous ulcers. Examinationrevealed three ulcers at her first visit.The hemoglobin level was12.1 g/100 ml, and the hematocrit was 35.5 per cent..iKenalog in Ora-base was .prescribed for temporary relief .of symptoms. The subjectreturned to the clinic on /jay 6, 1974. She indicated that she had no'oral problemg,'and that She had. been taking One-A-Day vitamins with.-iron:52\n s.51\nHer hemoglobin level at this second visit was 13.8 g/100 ml,\nshowing an,increase of1,7,g since her last visit six months earlier.\nHer hematocrit was 40.0 per cent, demonstrating a 4.5 per cent\nincrease.\nCase 22.The subject was 4 39-year-old female referred to thedental clinic by her physician on October 7, 1971. She complained of r. ./,having endured aphthous ulcers and cheilosis for long periods of time,.. I. , . . ,...and reported that she had both vaginal and oral lesions at the. ....-----present time.The subject indiCated that the vaginal lesions werecausing marital problems. She had bden taking vitamins for four/ ./1months but recognized no improvement. The hemoglobin level was13.0 g/100 ml at this first visit. Her hematocrit was 38.5 'er c nqi.AiKenalog in Orabase wasprescribed for immediate relief of sympt/The subject returned to the clinic on October 28, 1971, and tee3( semi-intense'aphthous ulcrs were observed, one on the lower 14,,,\n;,,one on the- floor of the Mouth, and one.on the tonele.. She reported. 1 .that she had one 'vaginal lesion. The,consulting dentist prescribedsteroids (40 mg.) for seven days, then a reductionto 30 mg. for one\nC,At week, a further reduction to 20 mg. for one week, and finall5r red.tion to 15 mg. to see if-her condition would stabilize.\n.Tracycline(if ____..L ____Lwas also prescribed. The subject made her las visit to4the clinic on April 8, 1974. She presented one very small lesion onthe right cheek, and reported that str had suffered no vaginallesions.Her hemoglobin level at this last visit was 14.1 g/100 ml,\nand the hematocrit reading was 41.0 per cent. Her overall conditionwas considered very much. improved. The hemoglobin level had increasid\n53\n (\nI.1.1 g, and the hematocrita inthat she feltvery well.52\ns. .\" s\ntease was 2.5per cent.Shea reported\nCase 23.The subject wasa 5I-year-:old female who was referredby /the J. Hillis Miller'Health Center on May'3, 1972 with a five-y.Ae-I .\n.history of..Cheilosis and glossitis.On examination she presented a4hot, burningtongue and cheilosis. The heMoglobin level was 12.0g/100 ml.Zinc oxide was prescribed far the cheilosis. The subject\n.returned to the clinic on Swas uncHanged. The investi- level on theooecond visit.r\na\nf tember 19, 1972, and hei oial Condition. .. ator was unabletodebtain a heml7lobin\nMCase 24J fie subject uias a 52-year-old female,who wasreferredto the dental clinic from ti-e Islatson Clinic in lakelthd, Florida onNovember 8, 1972. She presenteda history of aphthous,.glcers whichusually lastedas long/as Ithe tueas...the sides ofdays.Epmination.showed lesions underthetongue,andon the upper lip, Figure-10 and 11).The subject re orted that she was eating only oatmeal,since everything else hurt her mouth. She had gained20,poundswithin thelastyear.The hemoglobinlevel was 14.0 g/100 4, andthe h.emAtocrii.was 42.0 per cent. Tetracycline- mouthwash aneKenalog..in Otabasewere prescribed for temporary relief Ofsymptoms.The .subject reported next,ftom Lakeland, Florida on November 25, 1972,,\n,stating that she still had the ulcers, but that they 'usually clearedup in three days with the use of Kenalog in Or .The investigatorwa13 unableto have 'the subject return to the clinic for hemoglobin 0 0determinations. ;\nCase 25.Thesubject was.'a 75-yeaf-old female who was referredby the Watson Clinic in Lukeland,'Florida on August 2, 1973 with the\nA\n fti..1-5a\na.4\nloFigure 10.(case 20.:Multiple .pbthousUlcers on the\n455pper Lip14.\ntrw(\n :4A-6\n4\nti\n4.4ea5,54\nFigure 11.(case 24).Close-up View of MuktilIe AphthOns Ulcers on the UppersLip.\nA.,\n..3.56'4ti,\n 55\n$.re46rd of a long history of hdt-burningtongue. Upon examination\nin the dental clinic her tongue did not appear smooth or atrophic Asmight he,seen in glossitis.. The hemoglobin level al this firt visit\nwas 12.3 g/100 ml, -and the hematocrit was 40.0 per.cent. The subjectf\nreturned to the clinic on March 19, 1974 with the same chief complaint,\n.-a burning:ibhot tongue. The'hemoglobin level was 12.3 g/100 ml, the\nas it was at the first visi.. The subject returned to the' clinic *.\non April 13, 1974 appearing somewhat better. She claimed that she\nfelt 'such better, She had been tdking vitamin tablets with iron. for\nthe last month, and declared that this was, the reason she felt better:\nThe hemoglobin level .at' this last visit was:13.7 g/100 ml showing an\nincrease.of 1.4 g. Fer hematocrit at this last visit was 42.0 per cent\nshowing an increase'of 2.0 per cent. -/.*This.subj4ct was persistent in finding relief from the symptoms\nalthough her symptoms were difficult to diagnose during herivisXt to ,A\n.\"the yinic.Since the hemoglobin level showed an increase after )1\n,self-medication of vitamins with iron, a'condition of slight iron-,\\,defic*cy agemia may beiconsidered an uncle lying cause of her amt o-r,,#.\n. -, /..'Effti.!rs of FeL-ons ClueomaLe_Therally on 13 .Subjects\n. .Thirteen of the 25'subjects (cases 1-13) in las experimenttl\nZnvestigaLion,were selected to receive ferrous glusonate therapy..Although recording of the hemoglobin level was important for the pur-\nposes of theRudy, it was not primary factor,ia the decision cifthe\nderital consultant to Ke.serille ferrous gluconate. The prescribed\nthetapy vas in tht,foym of ferrou'sglUconate (320 mg.) tablets In\ndosages of one to three tablets daily for a period of 30 days.\nL.51I.\n 0tA.\ns56;\nThe subjeCts were observed A the dental clinic of the Univehity\nof Florida during the fouryear period of time from February 3, 1970\n.until April 3, 1974. Lt may Be seen in Table 2 that observations of\ne subjec.ts extended from miilimum period of two months toimum period'of 48 months. Although subjects were requested toeturn to the clinic after 30 days of following the ferrous gluconate\n. x-..- treatment, very few complied. Continued ehcouragement was required 4to achieve reasonable success in, gettIng subjects to return .or afollowup check of their conditions. Subjects indicated that they.e,wanted healthy mouths\ntion and maintenance:\neffort was necessaryfree of disease,, pain, and high cost of correc=\nWhen they were enduring intense pain, nd real.to encourage subjects to make the initial visitto the clinic. However, once free of immediate pain,'Lhe need for a-- second visit was a remote consideration.\nInspection of Table'2 reveals that, atypical,' conditions exhibited4 by these 13 subjects at)the first visit to the clinic included\n.aphthous ulcers, gloSsitis, cheilosis, and Statonts.Disease. Fiveqajectspresented combinations of these'lesions%.\n.c,Hemoglobinlevels at the firstand'second'visits arerecorded in. ,g/100 ml; and the extent Of change'is indicated in Table 2. It maybenoted that the readings of hemoglobin levels at the initial visit Of\nt '' 12 df the subjects ranged from 11.2 g to f5.1 g, wi,th an average.'e\ntreading of 12.5 g. The readings of the hemoglobin levels at thesecond visit of 10 of the subjects 'ranged from 11.9 g to 15.5 g, w ti\nan1\\taverage reading of 13.99 g. The change in hemoglobin levels f om,\nthe initial visit to the second visit of subjects ranged from +0.5 to+3.3 g, showing an average increase of 1.61 g.AlJ subjects for whom\n58'-/'t\nlot\n 41.,va, ,\n...I*f..\". ,:..° :. 11,ab Ie ..-e,...1If feces of.Ferrous 1`11,0conate Su-_?plebent s Q d GhslrF,,e_s in eroe1 obi n.. k,.....,...andOrai Letrf.An.a1 n--.13Subjects %.., ...1.10.\n.Ca s o\n. -.....,.2\n3\n.5\n633Ulkers.., -....._-.. '124. Markeds ..7a9: 10..1146FGlossi tig /Che ilos is ' ' 11..i._-_.248Unknown ,12,:,..\nz,13')r\n...4- ,-..Fri's1_.,.: :- ...--:-.. St-Ch..tni,e .-fie:01.,,_,,trved 1:-..p rovu.-'n..- n t,: AceSex ,0 r J1 !.e...1-1ori .;\"ii hi! .ft-ri(,irblf...inC.i n 111),.,.._ ::.'-.,-.. .in';.\n--.-,...*.--7\n.+3.3?'48>1.11-4,..- d.......,,.. 22..FAphLhous filC..--(rs ,;',: 12 -. 0, -;.15-3.,:. ' .22''''F\"Aphtheaus Ulcers.'..-b ---\n,.11..2.-11,9+0.7 ....1-1-... . ,.48 :--. No-me.1.6 .....:,, \"*. .7..-.. ..4HAph;titot-rs'Ulcers ... 15..8 ...15.+0,5.2Slight :....,, '- -.-s ... c .- Ln - :::..31.F-Aphthous U1 cers / it-.1.2:-..5.15.0+2.5.-,2 .....-.Che41osisiGI ossitis :--'-.,.'% .f.1.-; - ....\n,.....;.,-22-FSurton's Disease'- 1 ± 513,8 .+2.3'9-...Ma r;re d -.; , ,A ..,9 , ... -3phehous.\n.36- FCheilost s/Aphdrou,s Ulcers .-ii,:-2.013.5+1.5'36Milked'-;--1\n-I-::;;;_.' I- .._r. .c 38Glositis-..-.. 122... --- :_6\"No nt .e_...k..6s r44SApht-or hou$ UlcerA/Glositsis.12.0-13.5'+1.542Marked .-I e.... .-:F-Cheilosis 11.2-13.8-4-1.6 48Marts.ed ,.;- . . . _ ' --S53.F:Glossitis'..'12.713.4+0:7'36-Marked\": 767,FGlos.sitis/Cheilosis .,13.714.2+0.5'36Ma ekai,,4.\n 58\ncomplete hemoglobin determinations were made showed at least some increase .inthe level following ferrous gfuconate treatment.\nHemoglobin level. readings were incomplete for cases numbered six,\n. eight, and,eleven. The investigator was unable to procure any hemoglobin\ndeterminations for, case numbelr six. Casesnumber eight and number '11\nreported oral conditions by way of telephonefot the second visit, and did,\nnot report to the clinic for a second hemoglobin reading.\nIt may be seen in Table 2 that the final assessment of the oral con-\ndition, which was made by the dental consultant at the final visit, is\ngiven in simple terms of improvement. Further eAaminacion of Tslble 2\n,discloses that nine of the 12 subjects for whom data \"ere available (75(per cent) showed marked improvement in the oral conditions following treat-\nment with ferrous gluconte. The thirteenth subject, case number 11, did\nknot return to the clinic for final evaluation but reported by telephone\nthat she \"felt fine\". /\n(Two subjects, case number two and cage number eight, were the only\ntwo cases who showed no improvement in the oral conditions following the\nferrous g:luconate treatment. In the \"Report of Case Findings\" it was\nindicated that there was doubt that case Chumber two ollowed instructions\nfor medication properly, if at all, since she responded to 4. elephone call\nstating that she was' not foltowing the iron therapy prescribe for her.\nCase 'number eight did not return to the cli4ic -for reevaluation and only\nreportedbytelephone that there was no improvement in her condition. One\nsubject, cise number three, was reported to have demonstrated .only sight\nimprovement in the oral condition Case n,ber three reported by telephone\nI. ...4,..to thCclinic that ht did not suffer lefiPns as often as previously, but, ,.:.. t,\n4\n I\nA59 f\ncontinued to experientethem intermittently. 'It can be seen from\no...\"Table 2 that,the level,of hemoglobin for thi§ case could be con-\nsidered at ahf;',44lev, at the initial vistt, (15 g), and after\nmiktherapy wasincreased to 15.5 g. Cause far his failure to.improveremains in doubt.\nEffects of Treatment ReAdered to 12 Subjectswithout Use of Ferrous Gluconate '.Subjects numbered 14 through 25 were treated without the use.ofAferrous glpconate. It is pointed out, that the therapeutic Management\nof oral lesions manifested in most of these subjects was attempted\nthrough use of Tetracycline mouthwash, Kenalog in Drabas.g, and in\n. one case, Zinc oxide. .Systemic steroids were used in three caseswhere lesionS were \"too extensive, too deep, and too numerous, oin\nareas to which topical steroid ointment cannot be easily applied\"\n(31).It Is emphasized that these drugs were given only as temporary\nmedications, since they do not prevent oral lesions from recurring.\nThe drugs do, however, reduce the pain and curtail the length of timeduring which lesions,will persist.\nInspection of Table 3 reveals that the atypical oral conditions`\nexhibited by, these 12 subjects at the initial visit to the clinic\n1114.int 1 u ded six subjecith aphthous ulcers, three subjects with\nSutton's Disease, one subject with glossitis, and two subjects withcombinations of aphthous ulcers, Cheilosis, and glossitis. Hemoglobin\nlevels at the initial visit to the clinic showed a range of 12.0 g\nto 15.0 g with. an average reading of 13.15 g., The, hemoglobin levels.P1at ale second visit of seven of the subjects for whop{ readings were61.0\n Table 3\n.OnN7.t.Changes in hemoglobin and Oral Lesions of 12 SubjectsNot Receiving Ferrous luconate Supplements ,/\nrn...-CaseAgeSexOral Lesion.FirstHbe./(1.SecondHbv./(1\n1i.512.913.87--\n16.513.814.1\n13.7.-Chant;ein ng.,\n.\n-1.2-0.9+1.8\n---\n----+1.5.+1.7\n.+1.1\n+1.4Time Observedin !'!os.\n47\n36\n45\n12\n9,-12\n24\n8\n4524\n2\n10')\n.ImoroverontNone,(\"\"\\'..._S*toneNoneSlightSlight\n:4Unkno nMarkedModerateMarked\n.NoneSlightderate.c11.14'15\n16.\n1718\n19\n20\n21\n'22\n23\n24\n25-13\n.' 15'\n19.\n....22\n22\n-,'29.30\n'36\n3951\n52\n75M\n411vfaM\nF\nF.MiM\nF\nFF\nF\nFSutEon's.DiseaseAphthous Ulcers-.Sutton's Disuse\nAphthous -.lcer'S\nAphthous 11,4.cers\n,Sutton's Disease- Aphthous hiderstAphthous UlcersAphthous Ulcers/CheilosisCheilosis/ClossitisAphthous Ulcers-.Clossitis13.1.13.7\"13.812.012.514A\n.,15.012.113.012.314.0\n'12.3.\n 61\navailable ranged from 12.9 g to 16.5 g with an average reading of14.07 g.The <change in hemoglobin levels from the initial visit tothe second visit of subjects ranged from -1.2 g to +1.8 g, showing'an average increase of 0.77 g.It may be observed in Table 3 thatcases numbered 17, 20, 31, and 25 show an increase in hemoglobinlevels of 1.4 to 1.8 g.These four subjects reported that they hadtaken oral, iron supplements of their own accord, or that they hadreceived a prescription from their physiCians. These supplementsmay account for the fact that their hemoglobin levels were increasedmore than those of the other three subjects for whom readings weretaken.Hemoglobin level readings were incomplete for cases numbered\n'14,18, 19, 23, and 24 since the investigator was unable to securea second hemoglobin reading.\nThe final assessment of the oral condition which was made bythe dental consultant at the 'subject's final visit to the clinic is\ne,given in table 3. Time periods during which subjects were observed, 511' _ .are shown to extend from a minimum of. two months to a makimum of 47months.It may be observed that only two subjects, case number 20and case number 22 showed marked improvement in oral conditions, andtwo additional subjects, cases 21 and 25 showed only moderate.improvement.Three of these subjects reporte4 that,they had'takenoral iron supplements independently, and the fourth subject was$ p're ctibedsteroids.It is not kntwn whether the three subjects , .AP.wool have shown improVement if they had not taken the oral iron(,\\,.4.suppiements.\n!. * Thresubjects showed only slight improveMent, and two of'them,N ,,cases 17 and 18, reported that they had taken 1.itaMtns with irone63\n 62\nsupplements.Four subjects showed no improvement at all, repr.eseloor-\ning 40 per cent of'this group of subjects for whom complete data\nwere available, and for whom ferrous gluconate was not prescribed.\nnot possible to contact.case number 19 for a final\nevalua ion of his condition.\n.flypotheses\nIt was hypothe4zed first that the hemoglobin level in the bloodis related to the recurrence of such oral lesioqsas glossitis,\naphthous ulcers and,angular cheilosis. Those subjects. in wiomthe\nhemoglobin was increased to a level of 13.4 g or higher, whether or\nnot they received therapy with ferrous' gluconate, all showed at\nleast some improvgment in oral conditions, Those patients whose\nhemoglobin levels at the last cl;ar visit were recorded at 12.9 gor lower showed no improvement in oral conditions.\nIt has been stated previously that assessment of normal valuesfor hemoglobin has been asignated at levels ranging upwtrd from 13.5\ng/100 ml.It seems reasonable to conclude that the findings of this\ninvestigation support the hypothesis that l!emoglobin lqvc1I-nt\nlower margin or,below the recognized minimum normal range may accom-N4.44/pany or promote the occurrence of oral lesions such as glossitis,aphthous ulcers and angular cheilOsis. It may be concluded furthers\nthat as hemoglobin levels are increased, these oral conditions are\n, improved.' .The second hypothesis was that therapy with iron supplements\nwill reduce or control tfe occurrence of glossitis, aphthous ulcers\nand angular cheilosis. Data availablefor 12 of the 13*subjects64\n .1463\nwho were selected to receive.ferroUs gluconate,therapy show that,nine subjecta -(75 per cent) demonstrated marked improvement in the\nofconditions following treatment. Of the other three subjects,'-; .;\"therA was doubt that one Subject followed instructiods for the\nferrous glv.anate therapy; one subject failed .to return to the clinic\nforreevaldion;and the third subjeCtdemonstTated only slightimprovement.These findings seem to,be consistent with those ofSuzman (32),Waldenstrom (34) and Darby (7).. On the basis of thesefindings, the hypothesis is accepted.\n0\n65,4A\ntrX111(44\n CHAPTER'VSUMMARY, CONCLUSiONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS\na\n4SummaryThe purpose bf the present study was to present an experimentalinvestigation of the manifestations of aphthous ulcers, glossitis,wv\nand cheilo8is in the oral cavities of 25 subjects, the use of ferrousat-\ngluconate supplements on the control of these lesiods in 13 selectedsubjects, and the hemoglobin levels at initial.and final clinic visitsofall subjects for time periods which varied Iromone month to fouryearS.The investigation was delimited to a study of subjects whowere solicited in the Gainesville, Florida area, or who were referred --, to thedental clinic of the'aCollege of Dentistry at phe University ofFlorida. -Selection of subjectswas ?invited to the judgment of 'thedental consultant who was preseht in the clinic at the time of the oinitial visit. His assessment of oral conditions. and selectionoftherapy preScribed were the final judgmentf.. Petermiw.tion of thehemoglobin level was made by the'inveStigator, a registered technolo-gist, and was limited to the use ofthe'cyanmethemoglobin.procedure.;. 'In order to accomplish the purposes of the study, th% followinghypotheseswere postulated:li' The hemoglobin level in the blood.is related to the occurrence:of such oral lesions as glossitis, aphthous ulcers, and angular cheilp-sis:6'6\n64\n 65\n2.Therapy with iron supplements will reduce or control the ti'. ,\noccurrence of glossitis, aphthous ulcers, and angular cheilosis\nTerms were defined as their meanings were interpreted for use\nin the pr sentinvestigation.A thorough study and review of related\n.literature was made, and it was revealed that few studies have at\nt._tempted the investigation 6flthe occurrence of these oral lesions with\nthe possible relatedness of hemoglobin levels, and the effects of\ntherapy with only iron supplements..\nData which support this experimental investigation\"Were provided\nby theeparticipation of 13 subjects who-were selected by the dental\nconsultant to receive ferrous gluconate suplements during the experi\nmental period, and by 12 subjects who received no ferrous,ilconate\ntreatment.Clinical, laboratory, and deriptiv datg were obtained\nat thesublet's initialiand final visits. All data were:tabulated\nand summarized for purposes of comparison and interpretation of the\nfindings.Interpretations were made with particular reference to\napparent relationships between the hemoglobin level and periodic\noccurrence and reduction of oral manifestations of aphthous- ulcers,\n.glossitis and angular theilosis.\n°*1 Conclusions\nOn the basis, of the findings, and.within the limitations\nposed in the present Avesttion, the following conclusions .;1;;.4c-41ade:\n1.Presence of the drat sions of aphthous ulcers, glossitis\nand cheilosis does not appear to be significantly related to hemoglobi\nlevels which fall well within the generally accepted normal limits.\n1V2.Although hemoglobin levels may fall within the generally.67\n4\n .....6.6\n%144 accepted normal 1. its, ferrous gluconate supplements have a profound\neffect, upon reversal of established oral lesions and the prevention\nof recurrences.\n3.Hemoglobin levels which are at the lower limits, or below\n1/4,Alk the recognized minimum normal range seem to accompany or promote the\noccurrence of oral lesions such as glossitis, aphthous ulcers and\n%angular cheilosis, and as hemoglobin leVels are increased, the oral\nconditions areimproved/\nt.4.Eemales appear to have a tendency toward occurrence of iron\ndeficiency more often than males, especially during the Childbearingt.,\nyears, and therefore show more ,frequent Manifestatiens of pral\nlesions apparently related. to the hemoglobin level in-the blood.1\n5.When ferrous gluconate supplements are prescribed for the\nManagement of oral lesions such as aphthous ulcers, glossixis and\ncheilosis, subjects show' inareaS4 in hemoglobin determinations, and\nthe majority show marked improvement in the oral conditions following\ntreatment.\n6.When ferrous gluconate supplements are not prescribed for\nthe management of, Oral'lesions such as aphthous ulcers, :glossitis and\n,cheilosis, subjects show no improvement in the oral conditions.47.Although the regular intake iron supplements is not recom,\nmended, it appears that some subjects require daily supplements until\ntheltsionsresolve, and,some subjects require,daily supplements,\nindefinitely.\n\"*-8\n r..§1.\n. .In )he future, the variances in hemoglobip:0Rvels will have to be .\nconsidered,What may be csidered a normal hemoglobin level in an average\nindividual may natbe hde ate to control oral lesions in Ian otherwise\n.healthy\\individual. Wedor5t know what a normal limit is for theieL\n,indiViduals.What we do knbw is that the extra boost with iron therapy0\n,biringsout relief tothesLindividuals. , 1,\nd.. kf .Even though this pilot study mayge,considered inconclusive because '.\ne'.Of the small sample studied) the results indicate a strong relationship. * 441,.exists between the oral lesion and anemia. Until the consequences have been\nk6. *.\n..determined and fecorded on lariler studies the health educator phould.be1.....\naw.. are- thatthe strong possibilitli of nutritional anemia exists when the/ / p-oral' lesions are present. This information 9n dental health should be\ni. .% .ncluded in a comprehensive health educltion,prograni in the scAbols,\n%\n.Redommendations \"JBased on the findi gs reported \"in t investigation,ithe f9powing...i recommendations are ma\nti1.The study should be.replieated iniwhre icon-deficiencymay not beencountered a yegilealy,as it isI.A t11reported to be found in Florida.40oc1raPhic area\nV\n2.Additional studies of larger geoups of,suOectS shoulkbe t.re. ,conducted, under conditions of more direct control of the prescribed. conditions..treatments.s 0.\n.II-3.Similar study should be made of these conditions where all,'-\n, 0su je;th aregivffl double-blind opt ionp'using iron,Akets and\n.. 4F1.Isimilarlar placebos. ,.\n,...4;AdditiNalstudies should be conducted whete more extensive,1.. 'hemoglobin determinations and blood analyses are made; '...\n. i,. 4...\n. iB9.......!. . .K.t ,As. ..I'..,,.\n., :. vA\n.$ a t%tit.# I.. i...c....\n 4\n(V\n1.Abbott, O.A'm, J. Dis.BIBLIOGRAPHY\nand Ahmann, C. \"Iron Deficiency Anemia in Child,re,Ch.,,58: 811-816, 1939.\n2. Hematologic Slide Rule for Calculating theConstants\", J. La. Clin. Med., 34: 434, 1949.\n3.\"Angular Cheilitis:and Iron Deficiency\", NewJ., 65L258-261, Oct. 1969..Best, W. \"ACorpuscular\nBurton, J.Zeal. Dent.\n4.Chopra, G. and Kevany,' J. \"International Approach to Nutrition,\nAnemia\", Am. J. Pub. He., Vol 91 No. 2, pp. 250-251, Feb. 197V\\5.Coleman; D., Stevens, A. and Finch, C. \"The treatment of'Iron.Deficiency Anemia\", Blood, Vol. IX,No. 6, pp. 567-581,. June 1955.\n6.Conrad, M. °Iron Balance and Iron Deficiency States\",'Borden's Rev, Nutr. Res., Vol.. 28 No. 3,. pp. 49 -69, July -September 1967 ,\n7.Darby, W. \"The Oral nifestations of Iron Rficiency\",\n8.Durovic, E. \"The Problem of Angular Stomatitis\",4Prakt. Zub. _Lek.,17: 3057308, Dec. 1969,pp. 830435, March 30, 46.\n9.\"Effects of Lron-Deficinncy Ii niIP.eo,:ruiltano or Ov!American Academy of Vcdiatlf.r..:,\", 111(2.,1Aicli_L:tC,Iti Vol. 13 No. 16,Issue 328, Aug. 6, 4966. . .\n10.'Graykowski, E.; Baiile, M. ani Sti-Wey, H. \"R?cur1rentAplithousStomatitis\",'J.A.M.A., Vol. 198 No.T pp. ,637-644, May 16., 1966.\n.. .11..Guest, G. and BroWn, E. \"Erythrocyees and Hemoglobin of the\n'Blood in Infaricy and,Childhdod, III Factot't it Variability,Statistical Studdes\",.1, Dis. Ch., 93: 486, 1957.\n'. ,,12.GutelluS, M. \"The Problems of Iron Pefi,ciency Anemia in Preschool\n.Negto Children \", Am. J. Pub. He., Vol. 59 No. 2', pp. 290-293, ---I.Feb. 1969. ..... s. .A41°\n.70\n68.s\nJ a.\n 69\n.\n13.Horecker, B. \"A primary 't Inda.rd for the Colorimetric DeLet-mina-'0.on of Heimoglobin\", J. Lab. Clin.,?Med.31: 58941946.17.Hunter, F; Crove- Rosmusseh, M. and Soulter, L. \"Spectrophoto-. . .metic Method for Quantilating Hemoglobin in Plasma or Serum\",.Am. J. Clin. T.; 20: 42 1950.\n15.\"Increase Iron Fortificatio of Foods\", The Medical Letter,Vol. 14 No. 22, Issue 360, act. 27, 1972.\n16:Jacobs, A. and Cavil., I., Pyridoxine and Riboflavin in Patterson-Kelly Syndrome\", Br. J. Haem. ,Vol. 14, pp. 153-160,-1968.\n.,17.Jacobs, A. and Cavil t. \"The:Ora Lesions of'Iron Deficiency-- Anemia Pyridoxine and Riboflavin Status'', Br. J. of Haem.,Vol.. 14, pp. 291-295,1968,\n18.Kajani, M. \"S\".0dies oeIroirAransport in P'artal and Syq.t26ieCirculation\", Blood, Vol. 33 6. '5, pp. 677-689, May 1969...\n.1'9.Kerman, J. \"iqummei4inson Syndrome\", Arch. Otolar., 27: 66:-N,Oct. 194Q.\n20.\"Laboratory Assessmedtwof.NuNitional.Status\"i Am. J. Pub. He.,*.Suyp., Vol. 63, p. 28, Nova 1973.\n.21. .Lathan M. and Cobos, F..\"TheXfects of Malnutrition on Intellec-tual Development and Learn,IAlg', J...P4b. He., Vol. 61 No. 7,\n'pp.-1311-1313, Jul 'Y 1971.\n22.McInroy, R. \"A Micro - Haematocrit for Determining the Packed Cell'Volume anil Haemoglobin Concentrations on Capillary Blood\",J. .Clin. P., Vol. 7, p. 32, 1954.\n23.Makili, E. \"Prevalence of Angular Stoatar.itis, Cortelation.of Food\n.nd Metabolibof Vitauins and Iron\", A0C;....9dtt. Sc., Vol. 27, .p. 655-680, DDc. 190. ,_'.47../ AA,, i` 24.Millet, A. \"A Simple and AeC..nrate Hematocrit Tube \", J. Lab. and , 1Clin. Med., Vol. 24, p. 54)', 1939. /,\n25. 'Nizel, A. \"Iron anl Micro Elements\", 14&ienee of Vutritioo aridits_Application in Clinical Dentistry, W. B. Saunjirs Co., .Philadelphie, Second Edition pp. 87-190.026.Phic n s Desk Reference,,P blisher Chales Baker Medical.,Jr.,, pedicaEccind mics Company; Oradell,- fw Jersey,' Second Editions, pv 602,19173. .,c\na.1./\n 70\nA27.Shafer, .G.; Hine, M. and Levy, M. \"Diseases of the Blood andForming Organs\", Oral Pathology, Third Edition, pp. 665-700, 1974.28.Schour, I. and Massler, M. \"The Effects of Dietary DeficienciesUpon the Oral Structures\", J.A.D.A., 32: 44?-482, 1945.29.Scopp, W. \"Ulcerative Lesions of the Oral Mucose, Oral Med Chaptea'p...100, 1969.\n30.Stanley, H. \"Aphthous Lesions\", ()sal Sueg.ery, Vol. 33 No 3;' pp. 174-179, Feb. 1973.\n31.Stanley, H. \"Management of Patients 4 with Persistent Recurren1JAphthous Stomatitis and Sutton's Disease\", Oral Surgery, 7(:)1..,35 No. 2, pp: 174-179, Feb. 1973.\n32.Suzman, M. \"SyndrOme of Anemia, Glossitis andDy-sphagia\",lArch. in Med., Vul. 31 No. 1, pp. 1-21, Jan. 1933.\n33.Vogel, P. \"Oral Manifestations in Hematologic Disorders\",Oral Surgery, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 21-30, Jan. 1963.\n34.Waldenstrom, J. \"iron and Epithelium, Some Clinical ,ObseryAct. Med. Sc., Supp. 90, pp. 380-396; 1938.\nC.tions\",\n JAdditional References\nAdebonojo, Festus 0. and Strahs, M.S.:\"The State of Nutrition ofUrk9an Black Children in the U.S.A. \".Clinical Pediatrics 12:563-570, September, 1973.\nAscoli,. W., Guzman, M.A., Scrimshaw; N.S. and Gordon, J.E.:\"Nutrition and Infection Field Study in Guatemalan.Villages,'1959-1964%Arch. Environ. Health 15:439, 1967. .Driscoll, E.J., Ship, I.I., Baron, S., Stanley, H.R., andUtz, J.P.: \"Chronic Aphthous Stomatitis, Herpes Labialis and,Related Conditions: Combined Clinical Staff Meeting of theNational Institutes of Health.\" Ann. of Int. Med. 50:1475-1496,June, 1959\nHellman, R.W. and Smith, H.S.: \"Hemoglobin Patterns in LowIncome Families\".. Pub. Health Rep. 83:61, 1968.\nKatzman, R., Novack, A. and Rearson, H.: \"Nutritional Anemiain An Inner -City Community:' Relationship to Age and EthnicGroup\". JAMA 222:670, 1972.\n(.1The Medical Letter: \"Increased Iro Fortification of Foods\"..Medicallsetter 14:Issue 60, Octobei7, 1972.Owens, G.M., Lubin, A.H. and Garry, P.J.: \"Preschool Childrenin the U.S. who.have iron deficiency?\" J. Ped. 79:563, 1971.Ship, I.I., Merritt, A.D:, and Stanley, H.R.: ,\"RecurrentAphthous Ulcer's \": A. J. Med. 32:32 -42! JanuarY, 1962.\nN41\n.\n734\n0\n0\n"
} |
[
-0.04563199728727341,
0.08477742969989777,
0.018042782321572304,
0.04356386139988899,
0.0405234731733799,
0.061984021216630936,
0.13542184233665466,
-0.02167125791311264,
-0.03346547111868858,
0.0752730518579483,
-0.010854540392756462,
0.1305275708436966,
0.024755988270044327,
0.009861149825155735,
-0.00017026546993292868,
0.03818781301379204,
-0.049042362719774246,
0.04669024422764778,
-0.025428688153624535,
-0.053363148123025894,
0.035030875355005264,
0.059698525816202164,
-0.008633220568299294,
0.015031127259135246,
0.07355468720197678,
0.08663269877433777,
0.024929599836468697,
0.000769013655371964,
-0.0009576465818099678,
0.017822913825511932,
-0.007188136223703623,
-0.17701947689056396,
0.0017420615768060088,
0.004341305233538151,
-0.023135188966989517,
-0.05953856185078621,
0.10380548238754272,
0.06416019797325134,
-0.009604688733816147,
-0.06181930750608444,
0.020682889968156815,
0.009218652732670307,
-0.02773994393646717,
0.019490016624331474,
-0.02897447533905506,
0.066928930580616,
-0.057381413877010345,
0.009634636342525482,
0.015764182433485985,
-0.03343542292714119,
0.07323706150054932,
0.0033412629272788763,
-0.03544319048523903,
-0.11013967543840408,
0.015452896244823933,
-0.013316882774233818,
-0.03186922147870064,
-0.026439784094691277,
0.006817148067057133,
-0.031723037362098694,
-0.032682210206985474,
-0.05622662976384163,
0.016627609729766846,
0.014687428250908852,
0.03583616390824318,
0.04128846153616905,
-0.03306005522608757,
-0.013298192992806435,
-0.05254869908094406,
0.04741337522864342,
-0.029438477009534836,
0.08157560229301453,
0.05676024407148361,
-0.014581907540559769,
-0.03745809942483902,
-0.08616004139184952,
0.021601203829050064,
0.08405183255672455,
-0.08830185234546661,
-0.021589359268546104,
-0.05216629058122635,
-0.0022742680739611387,
-0.04789946600794792,
0.0003426288312766701,
-0.04123007133603096,
-0.010136812925338745,
-0.03738659247756004,
-0.02690221183001995,
0.012873643077909946,
0.009285567328333855,
-0.006368415895849466,
-0.003779859282076359,
0.08964357525110245,
0.041958317160606384,
0.008065948262810707,
-0.036664023995399475,
-0.01974176988005638,
-0.05996866896748543,
-0.11583345383405685,
0.011171901598572731,
0.016251612454652786,
0.02248697727918625,
0.04576185345649719,
0.03336981311440468,
-0.015608072280883789,
-0.03863128274679184,
-0.03906935453414917,
-0.11238646507263184,
0.042897794395685196,
0.040928520262241364,
0.02738998644053936,
0.0002104069571942091,
-0.030167410150170326,
0.03395133465528488,
0.040791794657707214,
-0.02567664161324501,
-0.007168104872107506,
0.006364319007843733,
0.02102014422416687,
-0.08472329378128052,
0.0016510648420080543,
0.003293141955509782,
0.026885395869612694,
0.00728427292779088,
0.003300759708508849,
-0.06487622112035751,
-0.019295236095786095,
-3.21684975893661e-33,
-0.062039997428655624,
0.053985822945833206,
0.017082592472434044,
0.14118972420692444,
-0.08887771517038345,
0.05242672935128212,
0.03432197868824005,
-0.03133625537157059,
-0.0035479222424328327,
0.025546055287122726,
0.012714272364974022,
-0.03859693184494972,
0.09770065546035767,
0.034855883568525314,
-0.02266608737409115,
0.05058560520410538,
0.018773335963487625,
0.05325252562761307,
0.05647776275873184,
-0.042598847299814224,
0.018717166036367416,
0.018440501764416695,
0.06212529167532921,
0.006885660346597433,
0.016095375642180443,
-0.04177502170205116,
-0.007179049775004387,
-0.0033730596769601107,
0.020644601434469223,
-0.027819998562335968,
0.059189748018980026,
0.02116718329489231,
-0.08949540555477142,
0.017751261591911316,
0.09020674973726273,
-0.07332785427570343,
-0.013690688647329807,
-0.0011070242617279291,
0.026036877185106277,
-0.049046024680137634,
0.009336507879197598,
0.0032711182720959187,
0.09574338793754578,
0.0558512806892395,
0.0808391273021698,
-0.03337676450610161,
-0.00839599221944809,
0.014037727378308773,
0.13141150772571564,
-0.05805160850286484,
-0.024653445929288864,
0.05322151258587837,
-0.0273508969694376,
-0.12295245379209518,
-0.003907026723027229,
-0.048675309866666794,
-0.06673797965049744,
0.13819894194602966,
-0.013933147303760052,
-0.04128127917647362,
-0.09242842346429825,
0.01376331876963377,
-0.013166600838303566,
0.0281553752720356,
-0.06670552492141724,
0.03214530274271965,
-0.12095257639884949,
-0.004697044380009174,
0.02767402119934559,
0.03806528076529503,
0.006970780901610851,
-0.028848370537161827,
0.01684180274605751,
-0.006692743394523859,
-0.0358896404504776,
-0.00022327534679789096,
0.11607588082551956,
-0.030389688909053802,
-0.03425021842122078,
-0.01671970821917057,
-0.08635039627552032,
0.02480422519147396,
0.06250090897083282,
0.000698914984241128,
0.026455245912075043,
-0.05125269293785095,
0.019782133400440216,
0.04215968772768974,
0.09174683690071106,
0.08682090789079666,
0.04825019836425781,
0.03609336167573929,
-0.0624096654355526,
-0.0871719941496849,
-0.025000648573040962,
5.432132964237529e-34,
-0.03928930684924126,
0.06127254292368889,
-0.023342039436101913,
0.024451162666082382,
0.08551628142595291,
-0.025712059810757637,
-0.059146422892808914,
-0.059481699019670486,
-0.005964308977127075,
-0.08956639468669891,
0.036882735788822174,
0.002608126262202859,
0.022406302392482758,
0.027480734512209892,
-0.03013004921376705,
-0.04675343260169029,
-0.00723202945664525,
-0.019643718376755714,
0.046701956540346146,
-0.023908019065856934,
-0.009729532524943352,
0.021450664848089218,
-0.028172798454761505,
-0.047733429819345474,
0.03410660848021507,
-0.06875105947256088,
-0.06550977379083633,
0.026191769167780876,
-0.02769218012690544,
-0.0010792334796860814,
0.022102227434515953,
0.13108795881271362,
0.04536013677716255,
0.023278726264834404,
-0.01210576482117176,
-0.04894709214568138,
0.011447456665337086,
0.009081562981009483,
0.023941770195961,
0.06698381900787354,
-0.060174405574798584,
0.0532795749604702,
0.06868423521518707,
0.010215484537184238,
-0.004425180610269308,
0.05492450296878815,
-0.006266220472753048,
0.0007101792143657804,
-0.09703455865383148,
0.10236647725105286,
-0.07479029893875122,
0.026812925934791565,
-0.09002823382616043,
-0.08656793087720871,
0.024531083181500435,
-0.006630591582506895,
-0.019123408943414688,
0.052534766495227814,
0.16844351589679718,
0.043204858899116516,
-0.00026834881282411516,
-0.05009035766124725,
-0.03067021071910858,
-0.013678580522537231,
0.007506390102207661,
-0.012388018891215324,
-0.07255327701568604,
0.11893875896930695,
-0.003598886774852872,
0.033396072685718536,
-0.02990250661969185,
-0.09530829638242722,
0.05482547730207443,
-0.026601621881127357,
0.015071994625031948,
-0.07309434562921524,
-0.03787042573094368,
-0.002935044700279832,
-0.07353155314922333,
-0.04876962676644325,
0.040964312851428986,
-0.008747187443077564,
-0.07880470901727676,
-0.020902279764413834,
-0.05413896590471268,
0.025918932631611824,
-0.002614698139950633,
-0.0373414009809494,
0.014490644447505474,
-0.015689928084611893,
0.02603660710155964,
-0.026623811572790146,
-0.0033828907180577517,
-0.0832986980676651,
-0.05566415935754776,
-3.262391956582178e-8,
-0.00767420744523406,
0.012459106743335724,
0.0053258673287928104,
-0.0025654160417616367,
0.0013764308532699943,
0.011957725510001183,
0.00737064890563488,
-0.03602141886949539,
-0.012332242913544178,
-0.02146976627409458,
-0.0791454017162323,
-0.04143968224525452,
-0.009031431749463081,
-0.03176051005721092,
0.08940917253494263,
-0.03350801020860672,
0.0010292523074895144,
-0.047076161950826645,
-0.05934877693653107,
0.048009760677814484,
0.05007828772068024,
0.053587906062603,
-0.0847177505493164,
-0.04290391877293587,
0.0020753745920956135,
0.01576266624033451,
0.13107866048812866,
0.016612697392702103,
-0.09165099263191223,
0.048644330352544785,
0.07286729663610458,
-0.017573580145835876,
-0.04878251999616623,
-0.058899134397506714,
0.006347026210278273,
0.03300558403134346,
-0.03675692155957222,
0.039913080632686615,
0.05997695028781891,
-0.03974463790655136,
-0.02434811368584633,
0.10617842525243759,
-0.010894287377595901,
0.06935235857963562,
-0.017232924699783325,
0.0193437859416008,
0.007871164008975029,
0.010493344627320766,
-0.010520107112824917,
0.02087480016052723,
-0.06875715404748917,
-0.03170820325613022,
0.0708838477730751,
-0.03938546031713486,
0.12759451568126678,
-0.03834158182144165,
0.044954411685466766,
-0.013008913025259972,
-0.027488788589835167,
-0.05444777011871338,
0.04312022030353546,
0.07125675678253174,
0.03239664435386658,
-0.0278194360435009
] | {
"pdf_file": "T7NO5D5YLX4V5I7FBDQDAIXPBCLNAO7X.pdf",
"text": "John Adams\n\"Children should be educated and instructed in the principles of freedom.\" ( Defense of the\nConstitutions, 1787)\n \n---\n \nJohn Adams was the Second President of the United States, revolutionary statesman and\nsigner of the Declaration of Independence.\n \n 1 / 1"
} |
[
-0.11883839964866638,
0.04829868674278259,
-0.0025480559561401606,
-0.011011209338903427,
0.05195074528455734,
0.010291832499206066,
0.1154332384467125,
0.0007007909007370472,
-0.08592535555362701,
-0.07065396010875702,
0.0013317164266481996,
-0.035472381860017776,
0.018434155732393265,
-0.006737178191542625,
0.024402987211942673,
-0.029503243044018745,
-0.058138374239206314,
-0.05043954402208328,
-0.020765526220202446,
0.029036032035946846,
-0.06367600709199905,
0.024029914289712906,
0.0262432973831892,
-0.006037362851202488,
-0.011076544411480427,
-0.0014006864512339234,
-0.018619801849126816,
0.03277004510164261,
0.0028860096354037523,
-0.05694391578435898,
-0.04394163936376572,
0.025414075702428818,
0.08790954202413559,
-0.02499123103916645,
-0.03668315336108208,
0.0062413448467850685,
-0.06646791845560074,
-0.0671444833278656,
0.020564241334795952,
0.04238877445459366,
0.021880215033888817,
-0.04288247600197792,
-0.03437700495123863,
0.06146686151623726,
0.0656372681260109,
-0.0785202905535698,
0.029487011954188347,
0.010798297822475433,
0.06332410126924515,
-0.04508465901017189,
-0.01823394186794758,
-0.027721041813492775,
-0.0036737609189003706,
-0.03659451752901077,
0.054250262677669525,
-0.02085655927658081,
0.015034922398626804,
-0.060095224529504776,
0.016393909230828285,
-0.03323858231306076,
0.01750349812209606,
-0.0005952207720838487,
-0.16348379850387573,
0.08492093533277512,
-0.07583844661712646,
0.0161097701638937,
0.048382941633462906,
-0.007598146330565214,
-0.024985475465655327,
0.05949747934937477,
0.0658901110291481,
-0.03513742983341217,
0.0008843158720992506,
-0.11567969620227814,
0.049390342086553574,
0.03360460326075554,
0.055154237896203995,
0.026383694261312485,
0.053694359958171844,
0.038932498544454575,
0.0004393816343508661,
0.0180604699999094,
-0.09288253635168076,
-0.004073987249284983,
-0.0008234609267674387,
-0.04883106052875519,
-0.006677441764622927,
-0.023541681468486786,
-0.03813307359814644,
0.05245159938931465,
-0.042493823915719986,
-0.055899728089571,
0.08681583404541016,
-0.04896170645952225,
-0.08339672535657883,
-0.0457635223865509,
0.029042238369584084,
0.03465776517987251,
-0.08649188280105591,
0.4062184691429138,
0.03594949096441269,
0.018697189167141914,
0.0979783833026886,
-0.007865204475820065,
0.023714108392596245,
-0.05756505951285362,
-0.06109985336661339,
-0.006620500702410936,
0.007060033269226551,
0.021669859066605568,
-0.024405108764767647,
-0.033514637500047684,
0.00025015627034008503,
0.03170765936374664,
0.04407161846756935,
0.09463243186473846,
-0.035580113530159,
-0.0045343064703047276,
0.043714847415685654,
0.00020504710846580565,
-0.002858717693015933,
-0.024884076789021492,
0.0037606365513056517,
0.014041258953511715,
0.07781578600406647,
-0.1323145031929016,
0.0068764761090278625,
-7.2201250750405e-33,
0.007334581576287746,
0.002726183971390128,
0.012147537432610989,
-0.002440247917547822,
0.027932560071349144,
0.03927065059542656,
0.003743888111785054,
-0.04643532633781433,
-0.014492551796138287,
0.05360198765993118,
0.006590632256120443,
0.03664784133434296,
-0.023135676980018616,
0.03275369852781296,
0.07811082899570465,
0.009627518244087696,
0.007964123040437698,
0.0028742437716573477,
-0.0018807238666340709,
0.004691542126238346,
-0.012402275577187538,
-0.0008041393011808395,
-0.023038707673549652,
0.04297299310564995,
-0.028259985148906708,
-0.06694644689559937,
0.038539037108421326,
-0.07085712999105453,
0.020109260454773903,
0.001460324041545391,
0.0014639950823038816,
0.049912355840206146,
-0.02594558522105217,
0.0008223677286878228,
-0.03757276013493538,
-0.028740663081407547,
0.03337514027953148,
-0.07462829351425171,
-0.035983964800834656,
0.025680823251605034,
-0.050139084458351135,
0.010837196372449398,
-0.04243791848421097,
-0.002668545348569751,
-0.004916265141218901,
0.16647927463054657,
-0.0011541391722857952,
-0.004960660357028246,
-0.06482207775115967,
0.06976216286420822,
-0.0028182310052216053,
-0.02132517658174038,
-0.11613703519105911,
0.04333868995308876,
-0.0033509607892483473,
-0.020106570795178413,
0.016554009169340134,
-0.043971188366413116,
0.020619438961148262,
-0.009089959785342216,
0.009713641367852688,
0.039391469210386276,
-0.012487754225730896,
0.009350251406431198,
-0.08647788316011429,
-0.04851773753762245,
0.02447775937616825,
-0.008494960144162178,
0.023063570261001587,
-0.012638214975595474,
-0.05100997909903526,
0.03675990551710129,
0.03771744668483734,
0.030916057527065277,
-0.028798431158065796,
-0.01926880143582821,
-0.019831717014312744,
0.03583517670631409,
0.08063048869371414,
0.00649732630699873,
0.03545527532696724,
-0.041958946734666824,
0.006693818140774965,
-0.024078864604234695,
0.09502369910478592,
0.054634999483823776,
0.004220988135784864,
-0.05180729925632477,
0.01021517813205719,
-0.041098661720752716,
-0.03574559465050697,
0.06131820008158684,
-0.0030944310128688812,
0.08796171098947525,
0.006000818684697151,
4.4925641867161134e-33,
-0.07716735452413559,
0.01899317093193531,
-0.03573813661932945,
0.0887979194521904,
-0.01755509153008461,
-0.0027626880910247564,
0.037273939698934555,
0.09013677388429642,
-0.09250447154045105,
0.0680299699306488,
0.022390201687812805,
-0.045089662075042725,
0.030878892168402672,
0.044495198875665665,
-0.005799654871225357,
0.03523358702659607,
0.06968843936920166,
-0.004063474480062723,
-0.028155116364359856,
-0.03572935611009598,
-0.030507177114486694,
-0.03237851336598396,
-0.0024998304434120655,
0.034929435700178146,
-0.04148077219724655,
0.030205287039279938,
0.04858911409974098,
0.0632987916469574,
-0.021693143993616104,
0.036800533533096313,
0.03896567225456238,
-0.023581488057971,
-0.05063262954354286,
-0.05820295587182045,
0.04826247692108154,
0.08404397964477539,
0.03678114339709282,
-0.0007768925279378891,
0.024848245084285736,
-0.05051735043525696,
0.039668887853622437,
-0.010082785040140152,
0.002244437113404274,
0.11697717010974884,
-0.021961307153105736,
-0.005805923603475094,
-0.048092879354953766,
0.003788944333791733,
0.035172659903764725,
0.07729728519916534,
-0.09319712221622467,
-0.011992926709353924,
-0.021968109533190727,
0.04129430651664734,
-0.022958293557167053,
0.004160518292337656,
-0.0432187058031559,
0.0702132061123848,
-0.01905948668718338,
0.0004752702370751649,
0.005480603780597448,
0.026761434972286224,
-0.033612821251153946,
0.01346849836409092,
-0.022746674716472626,
0.03873894736170769,
-0.024523282423615456,
-0.03632815554738045,
-0.0017924589337781072,
-0.052569907158613205,
0.006689464673399925,
-0.025846485048532486,
-0.1348353624343872,
0.0011394252069294453,
-0.047169335186481476,
-0.05347497761249542,
-0.018427148461341858,
-0.007304163184016943,
-0.009657083079218864,
-0.037726134061813354,
-0.033999841660261154,
0.01841733604669571,
-0.008003143593668938,
-0.005512353032827377,
-0.03353199362754822,
-0.0201805979013443,
0.021665804088115692,
0.01075822301208973,
-0.05747472122311592,
0.01969684660434723,
-0.007240809965878725,
0.023037107661366463,
0.12023406475782394,
0.0032419958151876926,
0.010150063782930374,
-1.3403668397415913e-8,
-0.046724583953619,
0.04062063992023468,
-0.05561641603708267,
-0.0018853341462090611,
0.056323979049921036,
0.049638908356428146,
-0.04154156893491745,
0.0325038842856884,
0.02574923262000084,
-0.018780937418341637,
0.06920813769102097,
0.02598794549703598,
-0.02782331220805645,
0.05757509544491768,
0.09128093719482422,
-0.01532574463635683,
-0.10472093522548676,
-0.027585938572883606,
-0.016222817823290825,
-0.035399287939071655,
-0.010461363941431046,
-0.013999390415847301,
-0.0002939800324384123,
-0.08362972736358643,
0.007932317443192005,
0.006960071157664061,
-0.04422977939248085,
0.07475824654102325,
0.07440952211618423,
-0.04058071970939636,
-0.0018266832921653986,
0.01985001191496849,
0.014382191933691502,
0.020585300400853157,
0.02213379554450512,
-0.06437048316001892,
-0.06369856745004654,
0.01613914780318737,
0.009907381609082222,
-0.0055595203302800655,
-0.05467313155531883,
-0.0233115516602993,
0.07046928256750107,
0.006468005012720823,
-0.047700025141239166,
-0.0036470729392021894,
0.007837599143385887,
-0.004974569659680128,
-0.01241857185959816,
-0.07781214267015457,
-0.0009409073390997946,
-0.008002524264156818,
0.006034235469996929,
0.08434933423995972,
0.10730371624231339,
0.011427774094045162,
0.013366665691137314,
-0.012747352942824364,
0.061454374343156815,
0.03564131259918213,
0.1587459295988083,
0.12640950083732605,
0.04654904082417488,
-0.015717294067144394
] | {
"pdf_file": "CVDOWLIOUVHDH3SRWHZALMVDPATFQGVR.pdf",
"text": " "
} |
[
-0.11485917121171951,
0.07419902086257935,
-0.010111464187502861,
0.07029932737350464,
-0.017954343929886818,
-0.0021275635808706284,
0.033775653690099716,
-0.07069122791290283,
-0.00833022128790617,
0.02984022907912731,
-0.0043710386380553246,
0.0033665404189378023,
-0.016987260431051254,
-0.02242409810423851,
-0.14653745293617249,
-0.006474082358181477,
0.005547768902033567,
-0.0027582827024161816,
-0.06688416004180908,
0.046859778463840485,
0.08143509179353714,
0.03625819459557533,
0.015285586938261986,
-0.015816109254956245,
-0.012973529286682606,
-0.007899442687630653,
-0.03309040516614914,
0.06495371460914612,
-0.001789891510270536,
-0.0228379238396883,
-0.036310482770204544,
0.06544314324855804,
0.0006085540517233312,
-0.025577325373888016,
0.10503300279378891,
0.08382442593574524,
0.10837659984827042,
-0.011228634044528008,
0.015009434893727303,
0.018320420756936073,
0.038444194942712784,
-0.0003287836443632841,
0.07963263988494873,
-0.0072927833534777164,
-0.041055887937545776,
-0.03466351702809334,
-0.022209156304597855,
-0.051190365105867386,
-0.0877583771944046,
0.11259478330612183,
0.0030252074357122183,
0.015066404826939106,
0.0008710294496268034,
-0.061794184148311615,
-0.04018046334385872,
-0.039595864713191986,
0.04843040928244591,
-0.009424866177141666,
-0.030445870012044907,
-0.06371808052062988,
-0.01881265453994274,
0.06575768440961838,
-0.010104995220899582,
-0.004803468007594347,
0.024413011968135834,
-0.007358673494309187,
0.03729677200317383,
-0.060099948197603226,
-0.04352300986647606,
-0.10176758468151093,
-0.003933960571885109,
-0.051998645067214966,
-0.07685817778110504,
-0.019341325387358665,
0.007796694990247488,
0.030558280646800995,
0.07755818217992783,
0.004216209053993225,
0.06553955376148224,
-0.08097078651189804,
0.05001633241772652,
0.01175288949161768,
0.04305421933531761,
0.0008164625032804906,
0.031889960169792175,
-0.08366516977548599,
-0.02988266758620739,
0.07489544153213501,
0.09183625131845474,
0.058802396059036255,
0.06674790382385254,
-0.027026131749153137,
0.012867948971688747,
0.03535507246851921,
0.1330750286579132,
-0.04176044464111328,
0.024711569771170616,
0.046236440539360046,
-0.03148742392659187,
0.08159715682268143,
0.019822819158434868,
0.03377175331115723,
-0.03663855046033859,
0.0021364677231758833,
-0.022884054109454155,
0.0034710706677287817,
0.040750954300165176,
-0.03756099194288254,
-0.04686642065644264,
0.03809117525815964,
-0.03708195686340332,
-0.00029677539714612067,
-0.028699757531285286,
-0.06164370849728584,
0.03864622861146927,
0.023131737485527992,
-0.07336404919624329,
-0.003726688213646412,
-0.016421595588326454,
-0.08749684691429138,
0.017593063414096832,
0.002489203354343772,
-0.004787016194313765,
0.0041952310130000114,
-0.011417843401432037,
0.002961255144327879,
-0.03211610019207001,
2.5032012610806452e-33,
0.04773600026965141,
0.014465772546827793,
0.01875683106482029,
-0.0345083512365818,
-0.07014419138431549,
0.0419553779065609,
-0.017125895246863365,
0.05638713389635086,
-0.04776551574468613,
0.04147239774465561,
-0.008960003033280373,
0.10552318394184113,
0.03140803426504135,
-0.026840582489967346,
0.012433713302016258,
0.022161832079291344,
0.041932739317417145,
0.09794872254133224,
-0.007170339580625296,
0.052157457917928696,
0.09921210259199142,
-0.1465955376625061,
0.09256047755479813,
-0.01833241991698742,
0.11448633670806885,
0.0176873616874218,
-0.05873371288180351,
-0.0037380773574113846,
-0.014642201364040375,
0.032236624509096146,
0.02147054485976696,
0.04355913773179054,
0.08338892459869385,
-0.08166154474020004,
-0.06466376036405563,
-0.009774229489266872,
-0.12507711350917816,
0.03304092586040497,
-0.037828654050827026,
-0.032022625207901,
0.003732287324965,
0.045398302376270294,
-0.033798698335886,
0.008416230790317059,
0.038984645158052444,
-0.02296968176960945,
0.049424879252910614,
0.06683044880628586,
0.05032243952155113,
-0.019419552758336067,
0.003213932504877448,
0.026697292923927307,
-0.10709580779075623,
-0.07140408456325531,
-0.030830994248390198,
-0.07410084456205368,
-0.022926388308405876,
0.028577351942658424,
-0.013856273144483566,
-0.037461332976818085,
0.04205280914902687,
0.04369674250483513,
-0.05520819500088692,
0.026472950354218483,
-0.04535771161317825,
0.04219250753521919,
0.03153416886925697,
0.038902174681425095,
0.04707721993327141,
-0.0534696951508522,
-0.0398951955139637,
-0.09053851664066315,
0.006707620341330767,
0.047986146062612534,
-0.04059348627924919,
-0.029329322278499603,
0.08131163567304611,
0.049464866518974304,
0.0481012724339962,
-0.015912050381302834,
-0.037447113543748856,
-0.0071257068775594234,
0.07229477912187576,
-0.026716886088252068,
-0.01577170193195343,
0.013839153572916985,
0.01559914369136095,
0.0624309740960598,
-0.03305450826883316,
-0.0072625381872057915,
-0.013057590462267399,
-0.06802830845117569,
-0.054467182606458664,
0.007218499667942524,
0.056002937257289886,
-5.2493110829190235e-33,
-0.04405052214860916,
-0.021422073245048523,
-0.09100882709026337,
-0.08526113629341125,
-0.02290394715964794,
-0.07446935027837753,
0.0006155327428132296,
0.02232583984732628,
0.03639643266797066,
0.018090637400746346,
0.013946320861577988,
-0.11787494271993637,
0.002104351995512843,
0.022364243865013123,
0.0019437508890405297,
-0.04310711845755577,
-0.025022730231285095,
0.00858723372220993,
0.04602476954460144,
0.00958134327083826,
0.07038125395774841,
0.06909048557281494,
0.04008704051375389,
-0.004728870000690222,
-0.030573420226573944,
0.051957953721284866,
-0.011108399368822575,
-0.09110508114099503,
0.007514531258493662,
0.004849383607506752,
0.0306643508374691,
-0.012143444269895554,
-0.09576410800218582,
0.100457102060318,
-0.020352179184556007,
-0.05683354288339615,
0.012619482353329659,
-0.041031815111637115,
-0.0701046884059906,
0.0419333353638649,
0.07165560871362686,
0.11317076534032822,
0.0390508696436882,
0.08443904668092728,
-0.04880888760089874,
0.04183749854564667,
-0.019497189670801163,
0.00734318420290947,
-0.05051935836672783,
-0.10446538776159286,
-0.04861636832356453,
-0.027066731825470924,
-0.016460243612527847,
0.03427905589342117,
-0.007079458329826593,
0.080967977643013,
0.030652688816189766,
-0.029078567400574684,
-0.043071676045656204,
-0.0027345968410372734,
0.025702139362692833,
0.052894797176122665,
-0.05755079537630081,
-0.0053298380225896835,
0.009566618129611015,
-0.03937516734004021,
0.08146431297063828,
-0.03186740726232529,
0.10407907515764236,
0.03322337940335274,
-0.01053229533135891,
-0.05492540821433067,
-0.06247251108288765,
-0.08034859597682953,
0.051381733268499374,
0.08292548358440399,
-0.04616920277476311,
-0.03617186099290848,
-0.019106287509202957,
-0.054172489792108536,
-0.012512829154729843,
0.012953256256878376,
-0.004779585637152195,
-0.01701776683330536,
0.021525640040636063,
-0.052522026002407074,
0.07571519166231155,
0.016997231170535088,
0.030443012714385986,
0.13158319890499115,
-0.09431666880846024,
-0.07627367228269577,
-0.03448151424527168,
-0.04120197892189026,
-0.00009020404104376212,
-5.715277140438957e-8,
0.048488665372133255,
0.0753323957324028,
-0.05070926994085312,
-0.0024281383957713842,
0.028507361188530922,
-0.06155325099825859,
-0.06091209128499031,
0.028901755809783936,
-0.014078360982239246,
0.05155891552567482,
0.0539046972990036,
-0.0014105394948273897,
-0.012327203527092934,
-0.11428780853748322,
-0.08292461931705475,
-0.11302518844604492,
-0.01563957706093788,
0.08961644768714905,
-0.06341495364904404,
-0.02862611785531044,
0.0038264188915491104,
0.027724066749215126,
-0.08670396357774734,
-0.03899795189499855,
0.008563254959881306,
-0.04774133488535881,
0.009816362522542477,
0.04987204447388649,
0.01225098967552185,
0.007107612211257219,
-0.005459574516862631,
-0.014261101372539997,
0.025582969188690186,
-0.07003296911716461,
-0.07117674499750137,
-0.01762077957391739,
0.052334826439619064,
-0.056162115186452866,
0.0070714703761041164,
-0.045912373811006546,
0.0023723572958260775,
-0.023594994097948074,
0.047898903489112854,
0.047602809965610504,
0.012098184786736965,
-0.029285253956913948,
-0.13626453280448914,
-0.08339087665081024,
0.004243990872055292,
-0.007917935959994793,
-0.025269661098718643,
-0.08445442467927933,
0.0037046661600470543,
0.05265161767601967,
0.058270666748285294,
0.02349630929529667,
-0.029871003702282906,
0.00007603854464832693,
0.03612927347421646,
-0.034650638699531555,
0.08141122758388519,
-0.080349400639534,
-0.024976005777716637,
-0.03851643577218056
] | {
"pdf_file": "5IXFUAXPIWSNS4I6KSOJCGHEFEEBY5IE.pdf",
"text": " Report No. 6-263-98-001-F\nDecember 30, 1997\nMEMORANDUM\nTO: USAID/Egypt Director, John R. Westley\nFROM: RIG/A/Cairo, Lou Mundy\nSUBJECT: Audit of USAID/Egypt's Review and Certification of Unliquidated Obligations for\nProject and Non-Project Assistance\nThis is our report on the subject audit. In finalizing the report, we considered the Mission's comments\non the draft report, which are included in Appendix II. The report contains one recommendation\nwhich is closed upon issuance.\nWe appreciate the cooperation and assistance provided to the auditors on this assignment.\nBackground\nThis audit is part of the Office of Inspector General's (OIG) worldwide review of USAID obligations\nfor project and non-project assistance. The OIG's Division of Performance Audits (IG/A/PA) is\nleading this worldwide effort, with the assistance of auditors from all OIG offices of Regional\nInspectors General.\nThe worldwide audit is limited to obligations for project and non-project assistance which had\nunliquidated balances on September 30, 1996. It does not cover obligations funded with U.S.-owned\nlocal currency, obligations for disaster relief, or obligations maintained by USAID for the Trade and\nDevelopment Agency.\nIG/A/PA randomly selected USAID sites for detailed audit work and also determined the number of\nunliquidated obligations to be randomly selected and then reviewed at each site. A total of 19 sites\n(USAID/Washington and 18 missions) were selected for review. USAID/Egypt was among those\nmissions randomly selected for review. 2Mission records indicate that, as of September 30, 1996, USAID/Egypt had 195 unliquidated\nobligations for project and non-project assistance with balances totalling $2.2 billion. Sixty-five\nunliquidated obligations for project and non-project assistance with balances totalling $1.6 billion were\nselected for detailed audit work.\nThe level of funding for the USAID/Egypt program is based on a congressional earmark of $815\nmillion annually. Since 1991, the Foreign Operations Export Financing and Related Programs\nAppropriations Acts, have allowed funds obligated before their expiration date to remain available until\nexpended.\nAudit Objective\nThe worldwide audit was designed to answer the following question:\nDid USAID/Egypt review and certify its unliquidated obligations for project and non-project\nassistance in accordance with U.S. laws and regulations and USAID policies and procedures?\nAppendix I contains a discussion of the scope and methodology for audit work conducted at\nUSAID/Egypt.\nAudit Findings\nDid USAID/Egypt review and certify its unliquidated obligations for project and non-project\nassistance in accordance with U.S. laws and regulations and USAID policies and procedures?\nFor the items tested, USAID/Egypt reviewed and certified its unliquidated obligations for project and\nnon-project assistance in accordance with U.S. laws and regulations and USAID policies and\nprocedures. We found no invalid obligations1\n among the items tested. We noted that the Mission\nconducted monthly pipeline analyses and periodic Section 1311 reviews to ensure that unliquidated\nobligations and commitments were valid and still needed. However, 6 of the 219 tested commitments\nhad excessive balances totalling $2,064,406 as of September 30, 1996. While the worldwide audit was\nlimited to unliquidated obligations/commitments as of September 30, 1996, we expanded the scope of\nour audit at USAID/Egypt to cover such obligations/commitments through August 15, 1997. In this\nexpanded period, we found that 11 of the 219 unliquidated commitments reviewed, totaling $318,569,\nshould have been decommitted.\nSome Commitments Had Excessive\n \n 1GAO's Principles of Federal Appropriations Law defines an obligation as \"some action that creates a liability\nor definite commitment on the part of the government to make a disbursement at some later time.\" USAID\nFinancial Management Bulletin, Part II, No. 14A, defines a commitment as \"funds set aside [for an obligation] to\npay for goods or services being procured.\" 3Balances As of September 30, 1996\nEach year USAID's Bureau for Policy and Program Coordination issues guidance for the preparation\nof mission and office budgets. For the period under audit, the guidance required that obligations\nshould provide funding for at least the first 18 months, but not for more than 24 months and that\ncontinuing activities' obligations should be sufficient to fund anticipated expenses for no more than 12\nmonths beyond the end of the fiscal year in which the obligation takes place. These are called \"forward\nfunding\" guidelines. However, in February 1993, USAID/Egypt was granted a blanket exemption\nfrom these guidelines.\nWe reviewed 219 commitments totalling $897 million under 65 obligations. Of the 219 commitments\nwe tested, we found only 6 of the commitments, totalling $2.1 million, had excessive (no longer\nneeded) balances as prescribed by applicable U.S. laws, regulations and USAID policies and\nprocedures.\nWe noted that the Mission continuously reviewed unliquidated obligations/commitments to assure their\ncontinued validity. Pipeline analyses were conducted monthly. We reviewed the fiscal year 1996 year\nend \"Section 1311 review\"2\n and found overall it was adequately conducted and documented.\nDespite the pipeline analyses and Section 1311 reviews, six commitments totalling $2,064,406 should\nhave been decommitted as of September 30, 1996 (see Appendix III). One commitment was for $2.0\nmillion and represented 99 percent of the total recommended for decommitment. The reasons these\ncommitments were not decommitted varied. For example, the Mission did not decommit the balances\nat September 30, 1996 because financial management personnel anticipated a commitment document\nextension that never occurred or they anticipated additional payments needed to be processed. In\ngeneral more vigorous application of existing analyses and monitoring procedures, and more persistent\nfollow-up on unliquidated balances would result in more prompt decommitment actions. Nevertheless,\nbecause the Mission decommitted these commitments prior to our audit, we are not making any\nrecommendation.\nOther Matters -\nCommitments After September 30, 1996\nWhile the worldwide audit was limited to unliquidated obligations/commitments as of September 30,\n1996, we expanded the scope of our audit at USAID/Egypt to cover such obligations/commitments\nthrough August 15, 1997. In this expanded period, we found that 11 of the 219 unliquidated\ncommitments reviewed should have been decommitted.\n \n 2Section 1311 of the Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1955 4Recommendation No. 1 : We recommend that USAID/Egypt decommit $318,569 in\nexcess balances identified as of August 15, 1997 and as described in Appendix IV of this\nreport.\nWe reviewed the 219 commitments identified in our sample for the year ending September 30, 1996\nand applied the same criteria as stated above, that was: to determine if they were valid and still needed\nfor the purpose and the amount committed as of August 15, 1997.\nWe noted that the Mission continuously reviewed unliquidated obligations/commitments to assure\ncontinued validity for the purpose and the amount of the obligation/commitment. Pipeline analyses\nwere conducted and presented Mission-wide quarterly. We reviewed the 1997 mid-fiscal year Section\n1311 review and found overall it was adequately conducted and documented.\nDespite the quarterly pipeline analyses and Section 1311 review, we found for the 219 commitments\ntested, 11 had excessive balances that should have been decommitted as of August 15, 1997. See\nAppendix IV for a listing. The total amount we considered excessive was $318,569. \nAgain, the reasons these amounts were not decommitted varied from case to case; however, for the\nmajority of cases, financial management personnel were not aware final vouchers had been paid. In\ngeneral, greater persistence in following up on unliquidated commitment balances would help assure\nmore timely decommitment action. The Mission should take action to decommit balances that are no\nlonger needed.\nManagement Comments and Our Evaluation\nThe Mission agreed with the audit recommendation.\nIn response to Recommendation No. 1, the Mission decommitted $318,569. Based on the action\ntaken by the Mission, a management decision has been reached and final action has been taken. As a\nresult, we consider Recommendation No. 1 closed. Appendix I\nPage 1 of 2\nScope\nThis audit is part of the Office of Inspector General's (OIG) worldwide review of USAID's obligations\nfor project and non-project assistance. The worldwide audit is limited to obligations for project and\nnon-project assistance which had unliquidated balances on September 30, 1996. It does not cover\nobligations funded with U.S.-owned local currency, obligations for disaster relief, or obligations\nmaintained by USAID for the Trade and Development Agency.\nIn conformance with the worldwide audit, the Regional Inspector General/Cairo audited\nUSAID/Egypt's review and certification of unliquidated obligations (and the 219 commitments under\nthose obligations) for project and non-project assistance, as of September 30, 1996. In addition, we\naudited USAID/Egypt's review and certification process as of August 15, 1997. The audit was\nconducted at USAID/Egypt, from June 18, 1997 through November 16, 1997, and was performed in\naccordance with generally accepted government auditing standards.\nMethodology\nAt the request of IG/A/PA, USAID/Egypt compiled a list of its obligations for project and non-project\nassistance which had unliquidated balances on September 30, 1996. USAID/Egypt's list contained 195\nunliquidated obligations with balances totalling $2.2 billion. We randomly selected 65 obligations\ntotalling $1.6 billion, under which there were 219 commitments totalling $897 million, from the list for\ndetailed audit testing. Random sampling will allow the OIG to make Agencywide projections based on\nfield work performed at a limited number of sites. We have not, however, projected the results of our\naudit work at USAID/Egypt to the Mission as a whole.3\nBecause the accuracy and completeness of the Mission's list was crucial to our ability to make\nAgencywide projections, we interviewed appropriate Mission staff about their methodology in\npreparing the list and reconciled the list and its totals to other Mission reports. \n \n 3Note that we did not establish a materiality threshold for reporting on our work at USAID/Egypt because\nguidance for the worldwide audit required us to report all instances of non-compliance with USAID guidance.SCOPE AND\nMETHODOLOGY Appendix I\nPage 2 of 2\nWhile conducting our fieldwork at USAID/Egypt, we also performed limited tests of compliance with\nAgency and Mission procedures related to Section 1311 reviews and eipeline reviews of obligations for\nproject and non-project assistance.\nWe reviewed each obligation to determine whether it was valid in accordance with the provisions of 31\nU.S.C. 1501(a) and decisions of the U.S. General Accounting Office. When amounts were questioned,\nand if necessary, we contacted responsible activity managers and contracting/grant officers in order to\nmake a determination regarding the validity of the obligation/commitment. Appendix II\n Appendix III\nPage 1 of 1\nAmounts That Should Have Been Decommitted\nAs of September 30, 1996\nCommitment\nNumberAmount of\nDiscrepancyReason for IG\nRecommendation\nAG-NBD/USAID LOAN\nFUND$2,047,192.20 Last disbursement 7/94,\nreprogrammed in 9/96\nCO-PCE-0001-I-16-2051 $11,911.92 Expired 10/31/94, no\nactivity for 2 years\nPIL #12, MFAR QANTARA $4,340.31 Final payment made 9/10/96\nCO-DHR-5555-Q-16-1085 $337.00 Final payment made 5/28/96\nMC-263-0132-03 $526.37 Commitment end date\n9/23/96, last disbursement\n9/17/96\nPIL # 16, PROJ 0144 LE $98.02 PIL expired 6/30/94, refund\nreceived 9/23/96\nTOTAL $2,064,405.82 Appendix IV\nPage 1 of 1\nAmounts Recommended for Decommitment\nAs of August 15, 1997\nCommitment Number Recommended\nfor\nDecommitment\n(USD)Reason for IG Recommendation\nCO-DHR-5555-Q-38-1085 $10,750.41 Final voucher paid 7/2/97\nPIL # 72, PROJ 0132 $50,593.93 Final voucher paid 4/24/97\nPIL # 83, PROJ 0132 $15,501.88 Final voucher paid 4/24/97\nTA-PRJ-263-96-007 $705.43 Incorrectly charged to this\ncommitment\nJV-263-87-569 $330.50 Obligating document expired\n5/31/97\nPIL # 9, PROJ 0170 LE $10,203.76 Final voucher paid 7/24/97\nL/COM-263-0193-01 $2,593.36 Final voucher paid 3/26/96\nCO-DHR-5555-Q-05-1087 $1,967.74 Obligating document expired\n4/30/96, final voucher paid 4/23/97\nCO-263-0152-C-00-5057 $200.00 Outstanding after decommitment on\n2/25/97\nPIL # 4, PROJ 0244.00 $174,341.20 Completion date 9/30/96 and last\ndisbursement 11/10/96\nL/COM 263-0132.49 $51,380.84 Final payment made 7/13/97\nTOTAL $318,569.05\n "
} |
[
-0.014491024427115917,
0.00002653530282259453,
0.01432790420949459,
-0.02714100480079651,
-0.04385647922754288,
0.02411925047636032,
-0.03301454707980156,
-0.03531334549188614,
-0.07999726384878159,
0.010645127855241299,
0.013235109858214855,
-0.08009335398674011,
-0.03674674034118652,
-0.047241512686014175,
-0.025233980268239975,
-0.0023905523121356964,
0.0250869058072567,
0.029084905982017517,
-0.0023059495724737644,
-0.10379238426685333,
0.08146216720342636,
0.030671581625938416,
0.042098142206668854,
-0.002679011784493923,
0.03662345930933952,
0.04457084462046623,
-0.07923254370689392,
0.11379289627075195,
-0.028487984091043472,
-0.011331114917993546,
-0.026426149532198906,
0.08002011477947235,
0.01025486458092928,
-0.04938860982656479,
0.19267655909061432,
-0.0012923480244353414,
-0.08157049864530563,
0.11922197043895721,
0.043478723615407944,
-0.00015583678032271564,
0.013321083970367908,
-0.10250430554151535,
0.032886963337659836,
0.03413115069270134,
-0.06848687678575516,
0.05419306457042694,
0.0016772880917415023,
-0.0547817200422287,
-0.015173426829278469,
0.0009440256399102509,
0.05707743018865585,
0.06159204989671707,
-0.05223771929740906,
0.06994252651929855,
-0.039701420813798904,
-0.015053187496960163,
-0.020511893555521965,
0.03784246742725372,
0.0007749107317067683,
-0.053282029926776886,
-0.070253387093544,
0.029092079028487206,
-0.018028004094958305,
-0.022714005783200264,
0.041293539106845856,
-0.014118469320237637,
-0.0631665363907814,
-0.032647959887981415,
-0.002525728428736329,
-0.07375035434961319,
0.028861340135335922,
-0.05885147675871849,
-0.03864287585020065,
-0.014101800508797169,
-0.042535241693258286,
0.06204207241535187,
0.06340445578098297,
0.09851672500371933,
0.08579082041978836,
-0.06702332943677902,
-0.026403266936540604,
0.07571922987699509,
0.07049137353897095,
-0.07906273007392883,
-0.08595851808786392,
-0.005077274516224861,
-0.032356031239032745,
0.07835908979177475,
0.06123960018157959,
-0.019030118361115456,
0.010689795017242432,
-0.014021411538124084,
0.050383277237415314,
-0.03575886785984039,
0.064884714782238,
0.012265460565686226,
0.028862420469522476,
0.0477462075650692,
0.1369342803955078,
-0.0018582225311547518,
0.049634918570518494,
0.02856454998254776,
-0.08750994503498077,
-0.05198710411787033,
-0.06345415115356445,
-0.06868185847997665,
-0.01967201568186283,
0.061750657856464386,
0.07182206958532333,
-0.06729547679424286,
0.048567745834589005,
0.01090352050960064,
-0.004310251213610172,
-0.07844831049442291,
0.05417260155081749,
0.037121862173080444,
0.012784961611032486,
-0.008592590689659119,
0.06006649509072304,
0.0062740822322666645,
-0.01023799367249012,
0.023950284346938133,
0.007890655659139156,
0.006288337521255016,
-0.04387164115905762,
0.006891333032399416,
0.018226129934191704,
2.726942835435244e-33,
-0.10356965661048889,
0.02680429443717003,
0.04443814232945442,
0.00354392291046679,
0.0028694423381239176,
-0.015930160880088806,
-0.02180972695350647,
-0.010042205452919006,
-0.019725875928997993,
0.045851919800043106,
-0.05917106941342354,
0.032145433127880096,
-0.04328068345785141,
-0.03562045469880104,
-0.018878411501646042,
-0.01726834662258625,
0.04125198349356651,
0.024273807182908058,
0.03510712459683418,
-0.047391150146722794,
-0.021871836856007576,
-0.018391579389572144,
-0.006426745560020208,
0.03249596804380417,
0.006139154080301523,
0.013920249417424202,
0.01878029853105545,
-0.04934883862733841,
-0.059023596346378326,
-0.0035562056582421064,
0.09107954800128937,
-0.019987931475043297,
-0.024233335629105568,
0.000031264884455595165,
-0.037281233817338943,
0.016521364450454712,
0.020875250920653343,
0.023340513929724693,
0.031495898962020874,
-0.005400750320404768,
-0.04257958009839058,
0.03975760191679001,
0.02958836406469345,
-0.015751255676150322,
0.08687243610620499,
0.024288777261972427,
0.009722528979182243,
0.00806733313947916,
0.07968944311141968,
0.048652589321136475,
0.008466033264994621,
0.0036145637277513742,
0.05353104695677757,
-0.018125934526324272,
0.021253244951367378,
0.003071137238293886,
0.07056442648172379,
-0.029125230386853218,
0.05968008562922478,
0.004426866304129362,
-0.018991565331816673,
0.05009301006793976,
-0.11987346410751343,
-0.02854953147470951,
-0.03179530054330826,
-0.02627004124224186,
0.037921905517578125,
-0.0774998739361763,
0.05994366481900215,
-0.04581701382994652,
-0.039369575679302216,
-0.07337548583745956,
0.0006880084401927888,
0.011044123210012913,
0.05346281826496124,
-0.01925862580537796,
-0.0035530885215848684,
0.03270929306745529,
-0.0964280441403389,
0.038755204528570175,
-0.0323733352124691,
0.008669551461935043,
-0.11316657066345215,
-0.04126926511526108,
0.0390666201710701,
-0.054550617933273315,
-0.018724534660577774,
0.009782161563634872,
-0.0024723056703805923,
-0.02453819289803505,
0.0034871497191488743,
-0.05258936807513237,
-0.053467441350221634,
0.13706441223621368,
0.04978521540760994,
-2.74736062129605e-33,
0.056170858442783356,
0.02491292729973793,
-0.014088637195527554,
-0.06785199046134949,
0.0015116952126845717,
-0.051111411303281784,
0.058624282479286194,
-0.16293998062610626,
0.06063493713736534,
0.002445556689053774,
-0.020192304626107216,
-0.06388179957866669,
0.031053053215146065,
0.033306434750556946,
-0.11066927015781403,
0.06266520172357559,
-0.08161070197820663,
0.048065900802612305,
-0.046064574271440506,
0.11439592391252518,
-0.03924303501844406,
0.09230398386716843,
-0.0651596337556839,
-0.014600001275539398,
-0.07895267009735107,
0.06440470367670059,
-0.0021818382665514946,
-0.02723054029047489,
0.09166613221168518,
-0.02604839578270912,
-0.05094684660434723,
-0.022871633991599083,
-0.0773538202047348,
0.05060967430472374,
-0.051937200129032135,
-0.11596807837486267,
0.09930345416069031,
0.04561493173241615,
-0.01889074593782425,
-0.03757614642381668,
0.11904995143413544,
0.002984545659273863,
-0.015721578150987625,
0.07887100428342819,
-0.030614739283919334,
0.0008497285889461637,
0.08198629319667816,
-0.06693640351295471,
0.025021839886903763,
0.10118129849433899,
-0.008297882974147797,
-0.03517569601535797,
-0.10173516720533371,
0.011331711895763874,
-0.0050260089337825775,
0.025463709607720375,
0.06503700464963913,
0.014126612804830074,
-0.11759816110134125,
-0.05270037800073624,
0.06482315808534622,
-0.023160159587860107,
0.09327369928359985,
0.03802288696169853,
0.05796707049012184,
0.06453628838062286,
-0.03736736252903938,
0.015824390575289726,
0.052078038454055786,
-0.02136465348303318,
-0.04330422729253769,
-0.03787672519683838,
0.05318855494260788,
-0.062369704246520996,
0.008335127495229244,
-0.0063728392124176025,
0.0557449646294117,
0.06455627083778381,
-0.013083496131002903,
0.020020047202706337,
-0.06931835412979126,
0.052510276436805725,
-0.049895431846380234,
0.0535963736474514,
0.03366488590836525,
-0.010916195809841156,
0.07768267393112183,
-0.03924282267689705,
0.0023457854986190796,
-0.030652571469545364,
-0.005355229135602713,
-0.04322584345936775,
-0.001226316555403173,
0.09001266211271286,
-0.05549607425928116,
-4.974357636911009e-8,
-0.05325469747185707,
0.030093438923358917,
-0.027618631720542908,
0.03417370095849037,
0.029498428106307983,
-0.029453139752149582,
0.05248308926820755,
0.013730566948652267,
-0.02513916604220867,
0.012651761993765831,
0.01150643453001976,
0.025657091289758682,
0.028034377843141556,
-0.006036767736077309,
-0.0515512190759182,
0.027806581929326057,
-0.04557323828339577,
0.02593858353793621,
0.02391359955072403,
-0.10257668793201447,
-0.050019070506095886,
-0.07217524945735931,
0.03902897983789444,
0.0837191790342331,
-0.08113795518875122,
-0.019659077748656273,
-0.011216960847377777,
0.06817996501922607,
0.07562446594238281,
0.023483991622924805,
0.026981953531503677,
0.025819232687354088,
0.019638115540146828,
-0.01955435797572136,
0.03816772997379303,
-0.09282086789608002,
-0.04148367792367935,
0.03758474811911583,
0.04025650769472122,
-0.02996683493256569,
-0.0724986344575882,
-0.028419816866517067,
-0.02988983504474163,
-0.0026066754944622517,
0.05109381303191185,
-0.05028405413031578,
-0.08450424671173096,
-0.031950902193784714,
0.024625366553664207,
-0.01753649301826954,
0.012538849376142025,
-0.04965139180421829,
0.040426500141620636,
-0.023475289344787598,
-0.013379634357988834,
0.05395328253507614,
0.027983838692307472,
0.00833986047655344,
0.0011826744303107262,
-0.036013413220644,
0.021036572754383087,
0.04271451756358147,
-0.01914832927286625,
-0.07505705207586288
] | {
"pdf_file": "BZO3QEJ3CE2OQFGHA7ZD3CDOWHI543UM.pdf",
"text": "(If more than one facility, complete a separate Schedule CC for each.)\nUSE OF UNIT —To qualify, the facility must: (check appropriate box) \n Generate steam or hot water for space heating or materials processing. \n Provide direct heat for industrial processes.\nTYPE OF CONVERSION FOR WHICH CREDIT IS CLAIMED —To qualify, the facility must have: (check appropriate box) \n A. Replaced a non-coal burning facility with a coal-burning facility.* Date Completed\n B. Installed an additional facility capable of burning coal.* Date Completed\n C. Converted a non-coal facility to a coal facility.* Date Completed\n D. Substituted coal for other fuels in multi-fuel facility. Enter the calendar year \n used as base year . Complete Parts I and III below.\n* Attach a statement describing in detail the type of facility in use previously and the type of \nfacility in use after replacement, addition or conversion. Complete Parts I and II below. \nPART I—SCHEDULE OF KENTUCKY COAL (Coal Subject to T axation Under KRS Chapter 143) The corporation must complete.T axable Y ear Ending\n__ __ / __ __\n Mo. Yr. \n Name of Corporation Federal Identification Number Kentucky Corporation/LLET Account Number\n Location of coal conversion facility (street, city, county, state) __ __– __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __\nSupplier’s\nCoal Severance\nID Number A B C D\nNumber of\nTons UsedPurchase Price\nof Tons UsedTransportation\nExpense\nIncluded in BNet Cost \n(B Minus C)\na. 00\nb. 00\nc. 00\nd. 00\ne. 00\nf. 00\n TOTALS 00 \nPART II—COMPUTATION FOR NEW COAL USERS (To be completed by a corporation that checked box A, B or C above.)\n 1. Total from Part I, column D ................................................................................................................................. 1 00\n 2. Credit Rate is 4.5% ............................................................................................................................................... 2 x .045\n 3. Tax Credit: Multiply amount on line 1 by line 2. .............................................................................................. 3 00\n 4. LLET Credit —Enter appropriate amount from line 3 on Schedule TCS, Part II, Column E ............................ 4 00\n 5. Corporation Income T ax Credit —Enter appropriate amount from line 3 on Schedule TCS, \n Part II, Column F ................................................................................................................................................... 5 00\n (NOTE: This credit cannot reduce the LLET for the tax year below the $175 minimum.) SCHEDULE CC\n41A720CC (10-11) \nCommonwealth of Kentucky \nDEPARTMENT OF REVENUE\nSupplierCOAL CONVERSION TAX CREDIT\nKRS 141.041 ➤ Attach to Form 720.*1100020222* PART III—COMPUTATION OF COAL SUBSTITUTION (To be completed by a corporation that checked box D on page 1.)\n 1. Base year fuel input.\n A B C D\n Number of Million Million Percent of\n Fuel Unit Units Used BTUs/Unit BTUs/Fuel BTUs Used*\n (Avg.) \n a. Kentucky Coal Tons x =\n \n b. Non-Kentucky Coal Tons x =\n \n c. Natural Gas MCF x =\n \n d. Crude Oil Bbls. x =\n \n e. Fuel Oil Gals. x =\n \n f. Other: x =\n \n g. TOTAL of c, d, e and f ...........................................................................................................\n \n h. TOTAL of a, b, c, d, e and f ................................................................................................... 100%\n \n *Compute percentages by dividing amounts in column C, lines a through f, by amount in column C, line h.\n 2. Tax year fuel input. \n A B C D \n Number of Million Million Percent of\n Fuel Unit Units Used BTUs/Unit BTUs/Fuel BTUs Used*\n (Avg.)\n a. Kentucky Coal Tons x =\n \n b. Non-Kentucky Coal Tons x =\n \n c. Natural Gas MCF x =\n \n d. Crude Oil Bbls. x =\n \n e. Fuel Oil Gals. x =\n \n f. Other: x =\n \n g. TOTAL of c, d, e and f ...........................................................................................................\n \n h. TOTAL of a, b, c, d, e and f ................................................................................................... 100%\n \n *Compute percentages by dividing amounts in column C, lines a through f, by amount in column C, line h. Page 2*1100020223*41A720CC (10-11) \nCommonwealth of Kentucky \nDEPARTMENT OF REVENUE PART III—COMPUTATION OF COAL SUBSTITUTION (Continued) (To be completed by a corporation that checked box D on page 1.)\n 3. Enter percentage of BTUs produced by sources other than coal in base year\n (from line 1g, column D) ................................................................................................................................. 3\n 4. Enter percentage of BTUs produced by sources other than coal in tax year\n (from line 2g, column D) ................................................................................................................................. 4\n 5. Subtract line 4 from line 3. If there was no decrease in percentage of BTUs\n from sources other than coal from base year to tax year, then the corporation\n is not entitled to the coal credit .................................................................................................................... 5\n 6. Enter percentage of BTUs produced by Kentucky coal in tax year (from line 2a, column D) ................... 6\n 7 . Enter percentage of BTUs produced by Kentucky coal in the base year\n (from line 1a, column D) ................................................................................................................................. 7\n 8. Subtract line 7 from line 6. If there was no increase in percentage of BTUs\n from Kentucky coal from base year to tax year, then the corporation is not\n entitled to the coal credit .............................................................................................................................. 8\n 9. Enter million BTUs input of Kentucky coal (from line 2a, column C) .......................................................... 9\n10. Compare percentages on lines 5 and 8, and enter the lesser percentage .................................................. 10\n11. Multiply amount on line 9 by percentage on line 10. Enter result here ...................................................... 11\n12. Enter average million BTUs/unit (from line 2a, column B) .......................................................................... 12\n13. Divide line 11 by line 12. Enter result here .................................................................................................... 13\n14. Enter average purchase price per ton (total from Part I, column D,\n divided by total from Part I, column A) .......................................................................................................... 14 00\n15. Multiply line 13 by line 14. Enter result here ................................................................................................. 15 00\n16. Credit rate is 4.5% ............................................................................................................................................ 16 x .045\n17 . Tax Credit: Multiply amount on line 15 by line 16 ........................................................................................ 17 00\n18. LLET Credit —Enter appropriate amount from line 17 on Schedule TCS, Part II, Column E ...................... 18 00\n19. Corporation Income T ax Credit —Enter appropriate amount from line 17 on Schedule TCS,\n Part II, Column F .............................................................................................................................................. 19 00\n(NOTE: This credit cannot reduce the LLET below the $175 minimum.) \n. Page 3*1100020224*41A720CC (10-11) \nCommonwealth of Kentucky \nDEPARTMENT OF REVENUE"
} |
[
0.009898630902171135,
-0.04869471490383148,
0.14448104798793793,
-0.06956347823143005,
-0.051408443599939346,
0.04046056792140007,
-0.017981331795454025,
-0.06383056938648224,
-0.07603806257247925,
0.07442117482423782,
0.10874829441308975,
0.12131430208683014,
-0.040959279984235764,
-0.08455707877874374,
0.06439855694770813,
0.03938489407300949,
0.04045317322015762,
0.0033740494400262833,
0.000027634061552817002,
0.01343620102852583,
0.03401101008057594,
0.032262541353702545,
-0.04643400013446808,
0.022930141538381577,
-0.010971139185130596,
0.020401429384946823,
-0.04212553799152374,
-0.03610054776072502,
0.025662511587142944,
-0.02789805643260479,
-0.034073181450366974,
0.03115593083202839,
-0.016589220613241196,
-0.030611557886004448,
0.07108363509178162,
-0.08605549484491348,
0.025211287662386894,
-0.021186774596571922,
0.022025948390364647,
-0.030648361891508102,
0.02093801461160183,
-0.061379216611385345,
0.008959153667092323,
0.02047095261514187,
-0.030742717906832695,
0.05399799346923828,
0.007101087830960751,
-0.07790780812501907,
-0.01064178068190813,
0.05871112272143364,
0.06293168663978577,
0.046876683831214905,
0.02849995717406273,
0.01741422340273857,
0.0021786217112094164,
-0.09282287210226059,
-0.05551809072494507,
0.05583782121539116,
0.02983170934021473,
0.026570593938231468,
-0.05577124282717705,
0.05453389510512352,
-0.08003614842891693,
-0.013057098723948002,
-0.08397772163152695,
-0.00911768153309822,
0.03276129066944122,
-0.1354416459798813,
0.05432300269603729,
0.016844607889652252,
-0.05368603765964508,
0.012122802436351776,
-0.036118146032094955,
-0.045619770884513855,
-0.05083513259887695,
-0.033371102064847946,
0.012300407513976097,
0.09546870738267899,
0.007122447248548269,
-0.1994839310646057,
-0.009065322577953339,
-0.0463843010365963,
0.0795389860868454,
-0.011750590056180954,
0.029664376750588417,
-0.062185488641262054,
-0.05333666130900383,
-0.06419257074594498,
0.08738361299037933,
0.018186911940574646,
0.10569260269403458,
-0.008081787265837193,
0.050725307315588,
-0.0352381132543087,
0.008205225691199303,
-0.05401625111699104,
-0.02235488034784794,
0.024433666840195656,
0.10755519568920135,
0.07654643058776855,
-0.02701176330447197,
0.09357094764709473,
-0.10844777524471283,
-0.044175297021865845,
-0.02636934258043766,
-0.03943583741784096,
-0.046244870871305466,
0.00011598709534155205,
-0.011836463585495949,
-0.029329026117920876,
-0.014442754909396172,
-0.04665523022413254,
0.09267494827508926,
-0.03304722532629967,
0.07328411936759949,
-0.050708312541246414,
0.03319232165813446,
0.054151520133018494,
0.028930196538567543,
0.004438105039298534,
0.05713750422000885,
0.039153411984443665,
-0.021356234326958656,
0.025075538083910942,
0.00546376034617424,
0.03914870321750641,
-0.002754234243184328,
-2.2509315408575435e-33,
-0.03650101646780968,
-0.0069561246782541275,
0.014773262664675713,
-0.006172045599669218,
-0.062013063579797745,
-0.09386632591485977,
0.04045942798256874,
-0.04822428897023201,
-0.04993297532200813,
-0.026120822876691818,
0.060816068202257156,
-0.07294164597988129,
0.000793752318713814,
-0.11870501190423965,
0.06984124332666397,
0.03369192034006119,
-0.022693969309329987,
0.021766213700175285,
0.08363991975784302,
0.010113225318491459,
0.006193276960402727,
-0.0020452996250241995,
-0.011150546371936798,
0.021542953327298164,
-0.02988976612687111,
0.039539579302072525,
0.0036071985960006714,
0.026140186935663223,
-0.04424150660634041,
0.03976225107908249,
0.05625019967556,
-0.06964527815580368,
0.017143873497843742,
0.0718112587928772,
-0.010345346294343472,
0.014477747492492199,
0.013263331726193428,
-0.09904307872056961,
-0.004136078990995884,
-0.06791810691356659,
-0.010522188618779182,
0.050552770495414734,
0.004978594370186329,
-0.045893196016550064,
0.05641816183924675,
0.022226786240935326,
-0.0421135239303112,
0.01135063637048006,
0.1405087113380432,
0.020969131961464882,
0.08921771496534348,
-0.03422689065337181,
0.023017995059490204,
-0.06034223362803459,
-0.10522710531949997,
0.02128668874502182,
-0.047929756343364716,
0.040228839963674545,
-0.007717532105743885,
0.028614819049835205,
0.10232052952051163,
0.07292453199625015,
0.011576487682759762,
-0.03253103792667389,
-0.09801661223173141,
-0.019187942147254944,
-0.035821519792079926,
-0.055154189467430115,
-0.003097976790741086,
-0.05904281139373779,
-0.015514296479523182,
0.008970835246145725,
-0.03680622950196266,
-0.07948090136051178,
-0.03445986658334732,
0.0008329626289196312,
0.007259576581418514,
-0.05945371091365814,
0.03810691088438034,
0.03501136228442192,
-0.08211755752563477,
-0.03554714098572731,
-0.009538527578115463,
-0.03700670599937439,
0.08425766229629517,
-0.07094873487949371,
0.014259817078709602,
0.019101474434137344,
0.07463452965021133,
-0.008598044514656067,
0.021137438714504242,
-0.04164382070302963,
-0.055882278829813004,
0.033798929303884506,
-0.004124808590859175,
2.1408867647681015e-34,
0.0036163555923849344,
0.029814353212714195,
-0.04744073748588562,
0.07789652794599533,
-0.030979782342910767,
-0.047988686710596085,
0.02832934632897377,
-0.05383511632680893,
-0.013126583769917488,
-0.0750701054930687,
0.06192398816347122,
-0.044197455048561096,
0.029624560847878456,
0.025931553915143013,
-0.041770320385694504,
0.06553322821855545,
-0.010464019142091274,
0.05044151842594147,
-0.02653205581009388,
0.039614807814359665,
-0.08139141649007797,
0.03822458162903786,
0.10180773586034775,
0.0823625847697258,
-0.021123414859175682,
-0.016456253826618195,
0.049049992114305496,
-0.03802437335252762,
0.10928675532341003,
0.018655795603990555,
-0.016673840582370758,
-0.01543337106704712,
-0.04443160817027092,
0.08984382450580597,
-0.00685283774510026,
-0.0939919576048851,
0.056770339608192444,
0.0069556632079184055,
-0.006753117311745882,
-0.06221381202340126,
0.05532956123352051,
0.049951862543821335,
0.07909136265516281,
0.056199561804533005,
-0.034075409173965454,
0.021707117557525635,
0.03905988112092018,
0.08019087463617325,
-0.05237456038594246,
-0.06445741653442383,
-0.10637342929840088,
0.01265935879200697,
0.07881253212690353,
0.04023360460996628,
-0.030331134796142578,
0.03521664813160896,
0.018902592360973358,
-0.03804243355989456,
0.050695739686489105,
0.006154421251267195,
0.012625609524548054,
0.03831588476896286,
-0.038201380521059036,
0.008001554757356644,
0.09202330559492111,
0.040976110845804214,
0.021291961893439293,
-0.009195302613079548,
0.020695215091109276,
-0.054378803819417953,
0.0028197397477924824,
-0.13347584009170532,
-0.08009324967861176,
-0.02010476030409336,
0.020733384415507317,
0.022368239238858223,
0.06469936668872833,
0.03352789953351021,
-0.06303369253873825,
-0.01052701286971569,
-0.0018667903495952487,
0.02571403793990612,
-0.10072983056306839,
-0.022785712033510208,
-0.019174305722117424,
0.0002189848164562136,
-0.016514301300048828,
0.03898325935006142,
0.0017180177383124828,
0.0025751483626663685,
-0.042074866592884064,
-0.05688733235001564,
0.053664430975914,
0.02166440524160862,
-0.050160087645053864,
-4.4902378704136936e-8,
0.032182756811380386,
0.024114560335874557,
-0.03656855225563049,
0.0373632088303566,
0.07457492500543594,
-0.026966987177729607,
-0.04599597677588463,
0.04107080027461052,
-0.0343344546854496,
0.017107481136918068,
0.07003428041934967,
0.04109494015574455,
0.03653379902243614,
-0.07723444700241089,
0.0036431390326470137,
-0.018755678087472916,
-0.06888267397880554,
0.021126702427864075,
-0.021944429725408554,
0.009800534695386887,
-0.0902194157242775,
-0.056175827980041504,
0.005334827117621899,
0.023805327713489532,
-0.03932231292128563,
0.10657630860805511,
-0.030254533514380455,
0.060876715928316116,
0.044799547642469406,
-0.0342717170715332,
-0.016830837354063988,
0.0656086876988411,
0.016103016212582588,
-0.011674017645418644,
-0.007571554277092218,
-0.016504226252436638,
-0.0654967650771141,
0.016691673547029495,
0.033963192254304886,
0.036830417811870575,
-0.029154103249311447,
0.010592433623969555,
0.027601078152656555,
0.04440183937549591,
0.051507700234651566,
0.06551196426153183,
-0.01586158387362957,
0.012995702214539051,
0.02218983881175518,
-0.04687437042593956,
-0.02870204672217369,
-0.03143686056137085,
0.051723334938287735,
0.018452759832143784,
0.01078213844448328,
0.06525915116071701,
0.03440969064831734,
-0.018802853301167488,
-0.01053817942738533,
-0.0388641431927681,
0.11047174781560898,
0.06923188269138336,
-0.06407077610492706,
-0.03303899988532066
] | {
"pdf_file": "MEA47HKC5QL3UF6KNGIXCXA62NTGCUTI.pdf",
"text": "387.220 Repealed, effective July 1, 1982. \nCatchline at repeal: Inquest required for appointment of committee -- Oath to jury -- \nFunctions of \"visitor.\" \nHistory: Repealed 1982 Ky. Acts ch. 141, sec. 146, effective July 1, 1982. -- Amended \n1976 (1st Extra. Sess.) Ky. Acts ch. 14, sec. 339, effective January 2, 1978. -- \nAmended 1976 Ky. Acts ch. 218, sec. 40. -- Recodified 1942 Ky. Acts ch. 208, \nsec. 1, effective October 1, 1942, from Ky. Stat. secs. 2151, 2155. \nNote 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 396, sec. 150 would have repealed this section effective July 1, \n1982. However, 1980 Ky. Acts ch. 396 was repealed by 1982 Ky. Acts ch. 141, \nsec. 146, also effective July 1, 1982. "
} |
[
-0.04832072556018829,
0.020461397245526314,
-0.06708347052335739,
-0.04462893679738045,
0.08448532223701477,
0.0800066664814949,
-0.008534952998161316,
0.008917231112718582,
-0.09037075191736221,
-0.08501241356134415,
0.05404702201485634,
0.05279586464166641,
0.016750074923038483,
-0.03370661288499832,
-0.09438838809728622,
0.1340699940919876,
-0.041675910353660583,
-0.03960546478629112,
0.04043181240558624,
0.021747946739196777,
0.0447872020304203,
-0.07156055420637131,
-0.027446119114756584,
-0.06222129985690117,
-0.06299145519733429,
0.002903885440900922,
0.12202044576406479,
-0.02374098263680935,
-0.05819254741072655,
-0.10980907827615738,
0.01639566570520401,
-0.0065459804609417915,
-0.007090881932526827,
0.016313686966896057,
-0.03860406577587128,
-0.029338525608181953,
0.02022918500006199,
-0.015225443989038467,
0.012645543552935123,
-0.03882308676838875,
0.043679848313331604,
-0.07302555441856384,
0.08254815638065338,
-0.10760807991027832,
-0.00531136617064476,
0.03251169994473457,
0.0025921359192579985,
-0.010532522574067116,
0.0233344454318285,
-0.04224889352917671,
0.03410502150654793,
0.04015868529677391,
-0.05228482186794281,
0.0514918752014637,
0.1038588359951973,
0.06205356493592262,
-0.0021620290353894234,
-0.03668009117245674,
-0.0018195902230218053,
-0.03868192434310913,
0.039104193449020386,
-0.0015248184790834785,
-0.04106668382883072,
-0.013210232369601727,
0.03535725176334381,
0.029795827344059944,
0.0004560306842904538,
0.07279486954212189,
-0.0861281007528305,
-0.05912567675113678,
0.027024803683161736,
-0.042021822184324265,
-0.011578792706131935,
0.008166002109646797,
-0.0010270788334310055,
0.1518387645483017,
0.04240138456225395,
0.007044461090117693,
0.026843268424272537,
-0.036726150661706924,
-0.0867038145661354,
0.0025916306767612696,
0.04348215088248253,
0.08579806238412857,
0.028349941596388817,
0.05068858340382576,
-0.04097054526209831,
-0.024042891338467598,
-0.10173090547323227,
-0.06365174800157547,
0.05113266035914421,
-0.0017389266286045313,
-0.019195817410945892,
0.09639433771371841,
-0.04991783946752548,
0.020872846245765686,
-0.0278569795191288,
-0.020791901275515556,
-0.06531323492527008,
-0.0020299083553254604,
0.03345291316509247,
0.010587606579065323,
0.01144709438085556,
-0.044330984354019165,
0.018806952983140945,
-0.01774907112121582,
-0.014933396130800247,
0.061023205518722534,
0.032035645097494125,
-0.007463804446160793,
-0.03220163285732269,
0.006648376118391752,
-0.06491124629974365,
-0.0765853002667427,
-0.02517572045326233,
-0.00658284081146121,
-0.04773041233420372,
0.10494910180568695,
-0.008536288514733315,
-0.07668968290090561,
0.11299395561218262,
0.010616171173751354,
-0.005424255505204201,
-0.023544948548078537,
-0.09589717537164688,
0.04872129485011101,
0.010259709320962429,
1.495250413954646e-32,
0.10018254071474075,
-0.03051351197063923,
0.01096014492213726,
0.029396627098321915,
-0.0070669022388756275,
0.06294798851013184,
-0.0626610815525055,
0.03957052528858185,
0.014818974770605564,
0.04046030715107918,
-0.0614117868244648,
0.021522589027881622,
-0.012813649140298367,
-0.024130212143063545,
-0.07906690239906311,
-0.1569630652666092,
0.021136241033673286,
-0.05567912012338638,
-0.013062672689557076,
0.04710143059492111,
-0.0018664071103557944,
0.08755587041378021,
0.02052251435816288,
0.05170850455760956,
0.038108840584754944,
0.09824363887310028,
0.009715110994875431,
-0.017548412084579468,
0.017706027254462242,
0.023000746965408325,
0.10216417163610458,
0.017464736476540565,
-0.014859356917440891,
0.02643001265823841,
0.007704815361648798,
-0.0031364159658551216,
-0.007641845382750034,
-0.017734326422214508,
-0.02442304976284504,
0.019814403727650642,
0.07353336364030838,
-0.12236576527357101,
-0.018883798271417618,
0.004099249839782715,
0.02510443888604641,
-0.047170672565698624,
0.08177626878023148,
0.008881006389856339,
-0.00650509400293231,
0.06727418303489685,
-0.06506428122520447,
-0.029062336310744286,
0.007966648787260056,
0.024228351190686226,
-0.000014291204934124835,
-0.07893731445074081,
-0.03723033890128136,
0.05949937552213669,
0.07515040040016174,
0.0036286725662648678,
0.03945926949381828,
0.029360700398683548,
-0.019873445853590965,
-0.017537610605359077,
-0.027266979217529297,
0.009341288357973099,
0.006412771996110678,
-0.09322299063205719,
-0.0053847660310566425,
-0.05704021453857422,
0.025794493034482002,
0.035670358687639236,
0.04481677711009979,
0.04684918746352196,
-0.016264308243989944,
-0.021953511983156204,
-0.04349903017282486,
-0.026629477739334106,
0.019948482513427734,
-0.043964169919490814,
-0.07346390187740326,
0.06541178375482559,
0.03309124335646629,
0.03939268738031387,
0.09342441707849503,
0.02110433578491211,
0.001646792283281684,
-0.04896310344338417,
0.020451441407203674,
-0.02916385605931282,
-0.010762037709355354,
0.013956129550933838,
0.02330034412443638,
-0.027478111907839775,
-0.0031974988523870707,
-1.2465332947991185e-32,
-0.035106342285871506,
-0.009951083920896053,
-0.02749767154455185,
-0.049670059233903885,
-0.02093280479311943,
-0.015401914715766907,
0.05794136971235275,
0.05417122319340706,
0.09679922461509705,
0.06773655861616135,
0.07450459152460098,
-0.03399251773953438,
-0.05125455558300018,
-0.11296579241752625,
0.062357570976018906,
0.02356930449604988,
-0.04106700047850609,
0.038713883608579636,
-0.0005000942037440836,
0.03254324570298195,
0.07060112059116364,
0.12353842705488205,
-0.024487968534231186,
-0.02496303990483284,
-0.004352941643446684,
0.06599888950586319,
0.07446210086345673,
-0.02499929815530777,
0.059494748711586,
0.08936285227537155,
-0.010411635972559452,
0.046887271106243134,
-0.05623782426118851,
0.11867984384298325,
-0.048959776759147644,
0.03357458859682083,
0.02653621882200241,
0.02990267612040043,
0.04488073289394379,
-0.06663461774587631,
-0.07645466178655624,
0.04015460982918739,
-0.05161118507385254,
-0.028890348970890045,
-0.006998045369982719,
-0.08457551896572113,
-0.04649065434932709,
0.0059288726188242435,
-0.03868020325899124,
0.035995133221149445,
-0.016937602311372757,
-0.011975953355431557,
0.028328221291303635,
0.04769499972462654,
-0.0321803018450737,
-0.04217499867081642,
-0.015394788235425949,
0.04669114202260971,
0.03361426293849945,
0.04780520126223564,
0.06152622029185295,
-0.04933508485555649,
0.023649809882044792,
0.031313538551330566,
-0.008868993259966373,
0.03236885368824005,
0.07098853588104248,
0.0073048449121415615,
-0.005491768475621939,
-0.055907439440488815,
0.03505084291100502,
0.03652419522404671,
0.002493001287803054,
-0.07430072873830795,
0.01990581303834915,
-0.04439639300107956,
-0.10379678010940552,
0.03567728400230408,
-0.0037138517946004868,
-0.002759525552392006,
-0.013635368086397648,
-0.014419115148484707,
0.011213955469429493,
0.016563326120376587,
-0.0271916463971138,
-0.08689458668231964,
0.06699830293655396,
0.0806761234998703,
0.07422155141830444,
-0.03032178431749344,
-0.06905002892017365,
-0.0077093071304261684,
0.06261434406042099,
0.07264261692762375,
-0.062298718839883804,
-5.149851745045453e-8,
0.015685735270380974,
-0.03432932868599892,
-0.014876572415232658,
-0.033640000969171524,
0.06082414463162422,
-0.052341241389513016,
-0.024835681542754173,
-0.0013783647445961833,
-0.04690605401992798,
-0.05285686254501343,
0.09234428405761719,
0.01772214099764824,
-0.14917472004890442,
-0.02536814473569393,
0.04493660852313042,
0.011542769148945808,
-0.062332771718502045,
0.03718223050236702,
-0.024922868236899376,
0.09880735725164413,
-0.00598392216488719,
0.020870789885520935,
0.039997123181819916,
0.03823326155543327,
-0.002419890370219946,
0.023867320269346237,
0.02073540911078453,
-0.003221651539206505,
0.03220786154270172,
0.005160647910088301,
-0.024862496182322502,
-0.012830895371735096,
-0.029034065082669258,
-0.0817238837480545,
-0.01585126668214798,
0.09127149730920792,
-0.0377083458006382,
0.0681271106004715,
0.05532797425985336,
-0.007924617268145084,
0.002302467357367277,
-0.16328108310699463,
0.0011222884058952332,
0.024969732388854027,
0.036293890327215195,
-0.09006856381893158,
-0.10275064408779144,
0.02924964763224125,
-0.01618589274585247,
-0.03969486057758331,
-0.03514096140861511,
0.031094128265976906,
-0.017730487510561943,
-0.07385383546352386,
-0.11258143931627274,
-0.03495302051305771,
0.01930723339319229,
0.004265059716999531,
-0.003655174281448126,
0.010064893402159214,
-0.02217203937470913,
0.08928924053907394,
-0.0031957870814949274,
-0.028229566290974617
] | {
"pdf_file": "KTCXROTYIAYW34ZFMVAKRU5FQFD3D7XQ.pdf",
"text": "From Power SupplyTo Magnet\nLinkBox1010A-r1 0ad9-Deut.skf\n11/25/02Service Bui lding 1010A\nPosition R10AD9\nY10D0 Y10DR B10D0\nyi10-dh0(pos)\n4 cablesyi10-dh0(neg)\n4 cablesbo10-dh0(neg)\n2 cablesB10DX\nbo10-dhx(pos)\n4 cablesB10DR1\nbo10-dh0(pos)\n2 cablesB10DR2\nbo10-dhx(neg)\n4 cablesSetup\nBlue Ring = Deuterons\nYellow Ring = Gold "
} |
[
-0.014598867855966091,
0.0002894574136007577,
-0.012791993096470833,
0.010371037758886814,
0.04333314672112465,
0.020833084359765053,
0.019907889887690544,
-0.006281006149947643,
-0.007967108860611916,
0.012038704939186573,
0.007399131543934345,
-0.03840094059705734,
-0.013934558257460594,
-0.08488351106643677,
-0.07053883373737335,
0.014022313989698887,
0.12721920013427734,
-0.03163297846913338,
-0.0024768062867224216,
0.004490380175411701,
0.02478693053126335,
0.03339308872818947,
0.003608275204896927,
-0.07648774236440659,
-0.038223348557949066,
-0.03377369046211243,
-0.029882874339818954,
0.00419777724891901,
-0.044224053621292114,
-0.0824163556098938,
0.06735702604055405,
-0.010988009162247181,
-0.002468418562784791,
0.04502120614051819,
0.11871621757745743,
-0.028799844905734062,
0.04102715104818344,
-0.015136378817260265,
0.036389902234077454,
0.020740559324622154,
0.010132509283721447,
-0.07538463175296783,
-0.08094519376754761,
-0.004526540171355009,
-0.0678258016705513,
-0.017591068521142006,
0.030632246285676956,
-0.02363186702132225,
-0.012089267373085022,
0.03377290442585945,
0.028988268226385117,
-0.016553599387407303,
0.09777797013521194,
-0.059551727026700974,
-0.049852509051561356,
0.055396582931280136,
0.014478035271167755,
-0.01637839712202549,
-0.07245451956987381,
-0.009100078605115414,
0.019935626536607742,
0.03458520770072937,
-0.0678892508149147,
0.038630835711956024,
-0.08127613365650177,
0.04566531255841255,
-0.010064888745546341,
0.009135395288467407,
-0.008674188517034054,
-0.15823324024677277,
0.06721146404743195,
-0.01163296215236187,
-0.0312026459723711,
-0.025943251326680183,
-0.012767693027853966,
0.05086440220475197,
0.0824689269065857,
0.06641725450754166,
0.058038100600242615,
-0.13840019702911377,
-0.08627067506313324,
0.027108430862426758,
0.011411523446440697,
-0.04087169095873833,
-0.008317037485539913,
-0.002065679058432579,
-0.032958436757326126,
0.05207710340619087,
0.057098034769296646,
0.02004103548824787,
0.034451574087142944,
0.040409594774246216,
-0.024619800969958305,
-0.03233160078525543,
0.008340832777321339,
0.02640361338853836,
-0.060280028730630875,
0.04796396568417549,
0.010929688811302185,
0.06110550835728645,
-0.0033759514335542917,
0.08658700436353683,
-0.04248376190662384,
0.02227509394288063,
-0.059888701885938644,
0.008446361869573593,
-0.021944411098957062,
-0.00793358962982893,
0.009522469714283943,
-0.03744625672698021,
0.033918678760528564,
-0.0031141117215156555,
0.045222535729408264,
-0.028014468029141426,
-0.018353775143623352,
0.013420894742012024,
-0.11798333376646042,
0.004141571465879679,
-0.003907088655978441,
-0.04134016111493111,
0.03243764489889145,
0.013471347279846668,
-0.10117063671350479,
0.007924151606857777,
0.026156112551689148,
0.031522732228040695,
0.12225461006164551,
1.0380216089247657e-32,
0.03208838775753975,
0.07579725235700607,
0.024452801793813705,
-0.009318471886217594,
0.1338542401790619,
0.036398809403181076,
0.07895208150148392,
-0.03590618073940277,
-0.003777788719162345,
0.06045078858733177,
-0.0266872588545084,
-0.060166601091623306,
-0.034517932683229446,
-0.09392721205949783,
-0.14888311922550201,
0.021648095920681953,
-0.017447730526328087,
0.05492526665329933,
-0.07633325457572937,
0.02293379418551922,
-0.03326449170708656,
-0.05926347151398659,
-0.015332638286054134,
-0.016192639246582985,
0.017412059009075165,
0.08443031460046768,
-0.020644409582018852,
0.023401686921715736,
0.06712877750396729,
0.054516471922397614,
-0.031422171741724014,
0.01514061912894249,
0.06971647590398788,
0.10180510580539703,
-0.00855256337672472,
-0.007286566775292158,
-0.06120894476771355,
-0.03605338931083679,
0.039285533130168915,
-0.02035572938621044,
-0.02477591671049595,
0.011227810755372047,
-0.001622909912839532,
0.03482963144779205,
-0.12417362630367279,
-0.0735461562871933,
0.11927671730518341,
0.05704960227012634,
0.11203531920909882,
-0.069554902613163,
-0.023486146703362465,
-0.022967983037233353,
0.05818590521812439,
-0.024320732802152634,
-0.0002639135345816612,
-0.06577584147453308,
0.03137049823999405,
-0.015047128312289715,
0.039491090923547745,
-0.016624407842755318,
0.0497644767165184,
0.11396770924329758,
-0.08685536682605743,
-0.013482613489031792,
-0.007396291475743055,
-0.06727248430252075,
-0.049453333020210266,
-0.024615470319986343,
0.1038132756948471,
-0.07976476103067398,
0.0670570582151413,
0.0055806562304496765,
0.06858963519334793,
-0.017306631430983543,
0.044311802834272385,
-0.010896842926740646,
0.02476881816983223,
0.025005333125591278,
0.0531623438000679,
0.03053087741136551,
-0.010725357569754124,
-0.050124891102313995,
-0.021626904606819153,
0.0015475251711905003,
0.0563996322453022,
0.007134534418582916,
0.04909002408385277,
0.0075013781897723675,
-0.000330709241097793,
0.03317413106560707,
0.036044541746377945,
-0.004289097618311644,
0.0020376183092594147,
-0.0013661078410223126,
0.027797074988484383,
-1.0416091442150784e-32,
-0.0660572350025177,
-0.021207259967923164,
-0.026018815115094185,
-0.045432426035404205,
0.0291095320135355,
-0.0002465432626195252,
-0.01086813397705555,
-0.1373198926448822,
0.06843426078557968,
-0.049278683960437775,
-0.05365890637040138,
0.026488708332180977,
-0.09623695909976959,
-0.06504630297422409,
-0.011319835670292377,
0.007897098548710346,
0.04709403216838837,
-0.018070142716169357,
-0.0021630602423101664,
-0.039602819830179214,
0.031350940465927124,
0.05330095440149307,
-0.01939687505364418,
0.0637398436665535,
-0.0259543526917696,
-0.018840495496988297,
0.04334106668829918,
-0.03413424268364906,
0.02466668374836445,
0.08417206257581711,
-0.07193128764629364,
-0.04662705957889557,
-0.02725209668278694,
0.06394147872924805,
-0.02043977566063404,
-0.0882958322763443,
0.04568247124552727,
0.004660309292376041,
-0.00549697270616889,
0.02336103469133377,
0.08224452286958694,
-0.015808818861842155,
0.0431942380964756,
0.02909041941165924,
-0.012542462907731533,
-0.0729142352938652,
-0.10079880803823471,
-0.03029811754822731,
0.009117565117776394,
0.029449565336108208,
-0.039477769285440445,
0.11252238601446152,
-0.07473296672105789,
0.009859775193035603,
-0.009105321019887924,
0.10147804021835327,
0.06065482646226883,
-0.04027273505926132,
0.005314936395734549,
-0.030872922390699387,
-0.006245489697903395,
0.14684253931045532,
0.03371427580714226,
0.015383599326014519,
0.07374269515275955,
-0.05734492093324661,
-0.04284718632698059,
-0.04430370405316353,
0.020142516121268272,
-0.03154155984520912,
-0.04040004685521126,
-0.10121544450521469,
-0.005488750524818897,
-0.09708156436681747,
0.018328653648495674,
0.022058185189962387,
0.046365682035684586,
0.02038927748799324,
-0.04684466868638992,
0.03289373219013214,
-0.017205966636538506,
-0.022073086351156235,
-0.009687363170087337,
-0.003645672695711255,
-0.01186953205615282,
0.051074814051389694,
0.047642167657613754,
-0.03297644853591919,
0.030016351491212845,
0.03869207948446274,
-0.05324198678135872,
-0.012445534579455853,
0.013892433606088161,
0.08708871155977249,
-0.04709073528647423,
-6.947894348741102e-8,
0.04561998322606087,
-0.013489188626408577,
0.03662384673953056,
-0.04644465446472168,
0.09300420433282852,
-0.06960181891918182,
0.0250007975846529,
0.04092463105916977,
-0.05120502784848213,
-0.02390490099787712,
0.14549057185649872,
0.03817341476678848,
-0.020628703758120537,
-0.06683342903852463,
0.029192855581641197,
-0.03573952987790108,
-0.016147224232554436,
-0.044534698128700256,
-0.08957575261592865,
-0.0608166940510273,
-0.03590182587504387,
-0.005155563820153475,
-0.03641773760318756,
-0.05066642537713051,
-0.006222408730536699,
-0.06212876737117767,
-0.04017987847328186,
0.09501789510250092,
0.06780396401882172,
-0.047509852796792984,
-0.012150811962783337,
0.04334641247987747,
-0.009429552592337132,
0.00589004997164011,
0.09000085294246674,
-0.017969435080885887,
-0.02674918808043003,
0.030773309990763664,
0.059429656714200974,
0.07212939858436584,
-0.03173326700925827,
0.028118882328271866,
0.052892886102199554,
0.062190473079681396,
0.013128365390002728,
0.024142716079950333,
-0.049118127673864365,
-0.059978265315294266,
0.05900919437408447,
-0.10139542073011398,
-0.08762069046497345,
-0.09819085150957108,
0.02545749396085739,
0.01740628108382225,
0.0004328509676270187,
0.0034106378443539143,
0.02048727124929428,
-0.03296675533056259,
-0.005711170379072428,
-0.006415756419301033,
0.031159497797489166,
-0.010146819055080414,
-0.04237911105155945,
0.012807786464691162
] | {
"pdf_file": "DROYHKJATHTGQRNXG6PEDVKVXILMNNET.pdf",
"text": " \n \nNOTICE OF MEETING \n COMMITTEE: FINANCE & INSURANCE \nPLACE: Committee Room #2– Second Floor \n ONEIDA COUNTY COURTHOUSE \nDATE: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 \nTIME : 9:00 A.M \n \n 1. Call to Order 2. Approve Agenda 3. Accept Minutes of May 11, 2009 and May 19, 2009 Finance & Insurance Committee. \n 4. Insurance for Fair Carnival Contractor 5. Solid Waste Supervisor position 6. Eric Summers – Director of Business Development – H.E. Stark Agency, Inc. 7. Vouchers, Reports and Purchase Orders \n County Clerk\n \n Treasurer\n \n Reduction/Revenue Generating \n \n Information Technology Services \n \n Finance \n Program Reduction Revenue Generation Hearing \n General Investment Summary \nAIS Position Vacancy Transfer \n \n8. Line Item Transfers \n9. Resolution for Line Item Transfers 10. ITS – Technology Plan 11. Strategic Planning Status Report 12. Public Comment 13. Items for Future Agendas 14. Adjournment \nNOTICE OF POSTING \nTIME: 3:00 P.M. DATE: May 20, 2009 PLACE: Courthouse \n TED CUSHING, Committee Chairman \nNotice posted by Melodie Gauthier, Deputy Clerk I, office of Oneida County Clerk. \nAdditional information on a specific agenda item may be obtained by contacting t he person who posted this notice at 715-\n369-6144. \nNews Media Notified: Time: 3:00 PM Date: May 20, 2009 Mail/Fax/Email \nRhinelander Daily News Lakeland Times Vilas Co News Review \nWHDG Radio WJFW TV- Channel 12 Editor Tomahawk Leader \nWLSL-FM 93.7 WXPR Radio WRJO Radio North Star Journal \nNotice is hereby further given that pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act reasonable accommodations will be provided for qualified individuals with \ndisabilities upon request. Please call Robert Bruso at 715-369-6144 wi th specific information on your request allowing adequat e time to respond to your \nrequest. **************************************************************************** ***************************** \nSee reverse side of this notice for compliance checklist with the Wisconsin Open Meeting Law. \n ****************************************************** \n "
} |
[
-0.11214788258075714,
0.04434314742684364,
0.014782185666263103,
0.051771655678749084,
0.027210837230086327,
-0.05119642615318298,
-0.01294828299432993,
0.011134452186524868,
-0.035019900649785995,
-0.044468335807323456,
0.09801579266786575,
-0.016771573573350906,
0.037414439022541046,
0.031105469912290573,
-0.06381562352180481,
-0.05177892744541168,
-0.07888351380825043,
-0.06065450236201286,
-0.00833878293633461,
0.030038584023714066,
-0.0005452193436212838,
0.05807093530893326,
-0.12547121942043304,
-0.006471462082117796,
-0.047335147857666016,
-0.08023203164339066,
-0.008122322149574757,
0.0007115487242117524,
0.059947818517684937,
-0.023184645920991898,
-0.05593939498066902,
0.08357638120651245,
-0.0689646452665329,
0.00865271594375372,
0.07602738589048386,
0.05523505434393883,
0.06993484497070312,
-0.019022520631551743,
0.010387551039457321,
-0.045641522854566574,
0.05666643753647804,
-0.0932702124118805,
-0.015436111949384212,
0.0815420001745224,
-0.017146537080407143,
0.01595202647149563,
-0.039630863815546036,
-0.049583550542593,
-0.057250700891017914,
0.0514654815196991,
-0.0712319165468216,
0.009362917393445969,
-0.06045002117753029,
0.049636632204055786,
-0.04585384950041771,
-0.01881556399166584,
0.01334428507834673,
-0.03561528027057648,
-0.011400760151445866,
0.027641672641038895,
0.03904390707612038,
0.015494138933718204,
-0.013010978698730469,
-0.020262131467461586,
-0.04065224528312683,
-0.030100593343377113,
0.01403572503477335,
-0.03143725544214249,
0.05434608832001686,
0.024606142193078995,
-0.0015009196940809488,
-0.04784974083304405,
-0.06709010154008865,
0.056945450603961945,
-0.007507224567234516,
0.019106028601527214,
-0.017814092338085175,
0.00006807804311392829,
-0.010244094766676426,
-0.06660787016153336,
0.01567182131111622,
-0.015323884785175323,
0.04376617819070816,
-0.07817059010267258,
0.006641557905822992,
-0.046283870935440063,
0.005406614392995834,
0.013472852297127247,
0.07741748541593552,
0.023993847891688347,
0.09925267845392227,
-0.06868908554315567,
-0.044885195791721344,
-0.020848888903856277,
0.004090272821485996,
-0.02260143682360649,
-0.024685969576239586,
0.03113141469657421,
0.040502458810806274,
0.03572385013103485,
0.029723962768912315,
0.019996659830212593,
-0.12768007814884186,
0.0463545024394989,
-0.06401756405830383,
0.03102732077240944,
0.007903104647994041,
-0.019362488761544228,
0.0712820291519165,
-0.009611682035028934,
-0.04378940537571907,
0.008729483000934124,
0.0036723942030221224,
-0.09176864475011826,
-0.0647786483168602,
0.14006845653057098,
-0.05438495799899101,
0.052736639976501465,
0.13165053725242615,
-0.08712837845087051,
-0.012063426896929741,
0.009023455902934074,
0.045376233756542206,
-0.045097578316926956,
-0.017331063747406006,
-0.04847186431288719,
0.13106785714626312,
7.019920754680203e-33,
-0.0070555489510297775,
-0.012706901878118515,
-0.029373718425631523,
-0.004323954693973064,
0.03804178535938263,
0.02516946569085121,
0.017309892922639847,
0.007705963682383299,
0.009337604977190495,
0.010028217919170856,
-0.04649270325899124,
-0.002675810130313039,
-0.09445911645889282,
-0.04416947439312935,
-0.01070142537355423,
0.007739412598311901,
-0.022834841161966324,
0.012039832770824432,
-0.02614036202430725,
0.030530063435435295,
0.06269141286611557,
-0.16021251678466797,
0.01027785986661911,
-0.02955816127359867,
0.016067644581198692,
0.01305923331528902,
0.027442416176199913,
0.016495198011398315,
-0.05755198746919632,
0.03742511197924614,
0.01384401973336935,
0.050447557121515274,
0.045594751834869385,
0.04681473225355148,
0.043372709304094315,
0.026400262489914894,
0.03713587671518326,
0.004667811095714569,
0.002699167700484395,
-0.010764578357338905,
0.03869834914803505,
0.011850259266793728,
0.0364161841571331,
0.0842994824051857,
0.028179338201880455,
-0.10239380598068237,
0.03838321194052696,
0.056051719933748245,
0.10691435635089874,
0.06648867577314377,
-0.01800571009516716,
0.015845127403736115,
-0.11756554245948792,
-0.09656693041324615,
-0.014445680193603039,
-0.009996323846280575,
-0.043647829443216324,
0.06335744261741638,
-0.053262192755937576,
-0.05095629394054413,
-0.02274751104414463,
0.019537154585123062,
-0.04538387432694435,
0.023373011499643326,
0.019261570647358894,
0.07590693980455399,
-0.036321479827165604,
-0.029063770547509193,
-0.038431305438280106,
-0.1251048445701599,
-0.053519438952207565,
0.008855264633893967,
0.039436012506484985,
-0.056726448237895966,
0.037406474351882935,
-0.013474264182150364,
0.03310571610927582,
0.05389954894781113,
0.043340668082237244,
-0.05760659649968147,
-0.06367254257202148,
0.01598091796040535,
-0.05187501758337021,
0.05780491605401039,
0.007755239959806204,
0.0008936760714277625,
0.07629916071891785,
0.02077256143093109,
-0.002020045183598995,
0.014109237119555473,
-0.010283485054969788,
0.034900665283203125,
0.03661330044269562,
0.023582521826028824,
-0.019727138802409172,
-6.778377971421331e-33,
0.03556964173913002,
-0.060104433447122574,
-0.016494272276759148,
0.02442690171301365,
-0.004404193256050348,
-0.10268176347017288,
0.06852346658706665,
0.0822102427482605,
-0.013686680234968662,
-0.07662613689899445,
-0.024844910949468613,
-0.06388811022043228,
0.06963304430246353,
0.01708916947245598,
-0.03771873936057091,
0.017153220251202583,
-0.02116827853024006,
0.04893447831273079,
-0.08078532665967941,
0.07141128927469254,
0.06797540932893753,
-0.02555116079747677,
-0.025419585406780243,
0.034458354115486145,
-0.04369819164276123,
0.07641925662755966,
0.002709832740947604,
0.004467317834496498,
-0.05203889310359955,
0.010886731557548046,
0.016720589250326157,
0.025154346600174904,
-0.029170330613851547,
0.10141514986753464,
-0.0782451331615448,
-0.10197093337774277,
0.08839142322540283,
0.047782208770513535,
0.004502275492995977,
0.052349530160427094,
0.05059368535876274,
0.04154066741466522,
-0.06494889408349991,
0.055561140179634094,
-0.047996196895837784,
0.03222639858722687,
0.08745945245027542,
-0.02403337135910988,
-0.01005933154374361,
0.004717250354588032,
-0.0365576297044754,
0.027472594752907753,
0.026417460292577744,
0.02694481611251831,
-0.02078293450176716,
0.029527343809604645,
-0.06415986269712448,
0.01841370016336441,
-0.0712694376707077,
0.07090368121862411,
0.10700777918100357,
0.045353859663009644,
0.009222081862390041,
-0.04001402482390404,
0.0754983201622963,
0.018851498141884804,
0.020007198676466942,
0.05422031506896019,
0.06385338306427002,
-0.006091452203691006,
0.02233545295894146,
-0.024431567639112473,
-0.14541664719581604,
-0.07410475611686707,
0.04474654793739319,
-0.04434368014335632,
0.038730863481760025,
-0.03267136588692665,
-0.033944424241781235,
0.014076207764446735,
-0.07704915851354599,
0.0634361132979393,
-0.12027526646852493,
0.009017220698297024,
0.09791971743106842,
-0.03749394789338112,
0.0023722711484879255,
-0.0573384128510952,
0.07745412737131119,
0.010775716044008732,
-0.008288851007819176,
0.060983240604400635,
-0.012855015695095062,
-0.011177260428667068,
-0.016246207058429718,
-5.498267086068154e-8,
0.01887401007115841,
0.03145864978432655,
-0.05232933163642883,
0.02223272994160652,
0.07190962135791779,
-0.04235358536243439,
0.042509496212005615,
-0.03334622085094452,
-0.058402735739946365,
-0.026395553722977638,
0.0114740626886487,
-0.026946578174829483,
-0.048876430839300156,
-0.1007075160741806,
-0.015352434478700161,
-0.07808535546064377,
-0.0045981393195688725,
-0.02562561444938183,
-0.05144446715712547,
-0.00847756676375866,
0.01069585233926773,
-0.06231524795293808,
0.04863470047712326,
0.020429782569408417,
-0.1473056524991989,
0.04578150436282158,
0.10008947551250458,
0.051897741854190826,
0.06758090108633041,
0.025078466162085533,
-0.07904896140098572,
0.028949839994311333,
0.04455186054110527,
0.007776122540235519,
0.03122749924659729,
-0.008118518628180027,
-0.013508265838027,
-0.03342556953430176,
-0.04037902504205704,
0.09158969670534134,
0.004987168591469526,
0.09218469262123108,
-0.032359037548303604,
0.0495881550014019,
0.018860038369894028,
-0.05652666464447975,
-0.09078075736761093,
-0.03543950989842415,
-0.015893982723355293,
0.06910886615514755,
0.008931759744882584,
-0.08510642498731613,
-0.03518342226743698,
0.04162725433707237,
-0.031455159187316895,
0.037158865481615067,
-0.009354355745017529,
0.04173613712191582,
-0.0298149436712265,
0.04713235795497894,
0.013185638003051281,
0.022298654541373253,
0.06665327399969101,
-0.03706706315279007
] | {
"pdf_file": "XYUJKKMUXDLLC6JTCXEWHK5ZMNSTPHF6.pdf",
"text": "1846 CFR Ch. I (10±1±98 Edition) §71.01±15\n§71.01±15 Temporary certificate.\n(a) If necessary to prevent delay of\nthe vessel, a temporary certificate of\ninspection, Form CG-854, shall be\nissued pending the issuance and deliv-\nery of the regular certificate of inspec-\ntion. Such temporary certificate shall\nbe carried in the same manner as the\nregular certificate and shall in all ways\nbe considered the same as the regular\ncertificate of inspection which it rep-\nresents.\n(b) [Reserved]\n§71.01±20 Expired certificate.\n(a) Nothing in this subpart shall pre-\nvent a vessel upon a regularly estab-\nlished line from a port in the United\nStates to a port of a foreign country\nnot contiguous to the United States\nwhose certificate of inspection expires\nat sea or while said vessel is in a for-\neign port or a port of Hawaii from law-\nfully completing her voyage without\nthe valid certificate of inspection or\ntemporary certificate required by this\nsubpart: Provided, That the voyage\nshall be completed within 30 days after\nthe expiration of the certificate of in-\nspection. No such vessel shall depart if\nits certificate of inspection will expire\nwithin 15 days of the date of sailing.\n(b) [Reserved]\nSubpart 71.05ÐPermit To Proceed\nto Another Port for Repair\n§71.05±1 When issued.\n(a) The Officer in Charge, Marine In-\nspection, may issue a permit to proceed\nto another port for repair, Form CG±\n948, to a vessel, if in his judgment it\ncan be done with safety, even if the\ncertificate of inspection of the vessel\nhas expired or is about to expire.\n(b) [Reserved]\n§71.05±5 To whom issued.\n(a) Such permit will only be issued\nupon the written application of the\nmaster, owner, or agent of the vessel.\n(b) [Reserved]\n§71.05±10 Conditions of permit.\n(a) The permit will state upon its\nface the conditions under which it is\nissued and whether or not the vessel is\npermitted to carry freight or pas-sengers. Passengers may not be carried\nif the certificate of inspection has ex-\npired, except as provided under § 71.01±\n20.\n(b) [Reserved]\n§71.05±15 Posting.\n(a) The permit shall be carried in a\nmanner similar to that described in\n§71.01±5 for a certificate of inspection.\n(b) [Reserved]\nSubpart 71.10ÐPermit To Engage\nin Excursions\n§71.10±1 When issued.\n(a) The Officer in Charge, Marine In-\nspection, may issue a permit to carry\nadditional passengers on an excursion,\nForm CG-949, if after personally in-\nspecting the vessel, it can, in his judg-\nment, be done with safety.\n(b) [Reserved]\n§71.10±5 To whom issued.\n(a) Such permit will only be issued\nupon the written application of the\nmaster, owner, or agent of the vessel.\n(b) [Reserved]\n§71.10±10 Conditions of permit.\n(a) The permit will state upon its\nface the conditions under which it is\nissued, the number of extra passengers\nthe vessel may carry, any additional\nlifesaving or safety equipment which\nwill be required, the route for which\nthe permit is granted, and the dates on\nwhich the permit will be valid.\n(b) [Reserved]\n§71.10±15 Posting.\n(a) The permit when used, shall be\ncarried in addition to the certificate of\ninspection and shall be carried in a\nmanner similar to that described in\n§71.01±5 for a certificate of inspection.\n(b) [Reserved]\nSubpart 71.15ÐInspection of\nVessels\n§71.15±1 Standards in inspection of\nhulls, boilers, and machinery.\nIn the inspection of hulls, boilers,\nand machinery of vessels, the stand-\nards established by the American Bu-\nreau of Shipping, see part 70, subpart\nVerDate 11<SEP>98 04:54 Oct 23, 1998 Jkt 179180 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\\SGML\\179180T.XXX 179180T PsN: 179180T"
} |
[
-0.07983105629682541,
0.05379354581236839,
-0.013942662626504898,
-0.0634290799498558,
-0.011879261583089828,
-0.044235751032829285,
-0.021114300936460495,
0.08509347587823868,
-0.05607718601822853,
-0.06374774128198624,
-0.01876833289861679,
-0.03353820741176605,
0.0012339359382167459,
0.006743716076016426,
-0.08636891096830368,
-0.07542797923088074,
0.08363010734319687,
0.014863718301057816,
0.011289965361356735,
-0.12330374866724014,
-0.04586198180913925,
0.006013029720634222,
0.020001204684376717,
0.05038461834192276,
0.05527612194418907,
0.028493748977780342,
-0.013620267622172832,
-0.023046007379889488,
0.01385261956602335,
0.012947105802595615,
-0.04725530371069908,
0.023439103737473488,
-0.01948026567697525,
-0.05969139188528061,
0.06860354542732239,
-0.011554315686225891,
-0.033267244696617126,
0.047675568610429764,
-0.02371465228497982,
0.027638999745249748,
0.029437748715281487,
0.021425670012831688,
-0.05247974768280983,
-0.03933452442288399,
0.06437993794679642,
-0.05291386693716049,
-0.10200963169336319,
-0.10335524380207062,
-0.06442005932331085,
0.04168548807501793,
0.00595833221450448,
0.030489454045891762,
-0.028208840638399124,
0.004268535412847996,
-0.03610387444496155,
-0.11482368409633636,
0.11237284541130066,
-0.007629135623574257,
-0.04955293610692024,
0.003304668003693223,
0.03580860793590546,
-0.08198226243257523,
0.04935133084654808,
0.014156501740217209,
0.09165310859680176,
0.00028864320483990014,
0.010525436140596867,
-0.02739277295768261,
0.04073560610413551,
0.014460405334830284,
0.0017690336098894477,
0.020409628748893738,
-0.07953104376792908,
-0.034963224083185196,
-0.032306987792253494,
0.08400923013687134,
0.12668700516223907,
-0.001412318437360227,
-0.07018642872571945,
0.07325156778097153,
0.019709613174200058,
-0.01013692282140255,
0.024360472336411476,
-0.011193128302693367,
-0.04065796360373497,
0.07627219706773758,
-0.11780374497175217,
0.02112373150885105,
0.042755886912345886,
0.03194459155201912,
-0.059281639754772186,
0.014297140762209892,
0.08730963617563248,
-0.02531246654689312,
0.03221913054585457,
0.03460945561528206,
-0.012148305773735046,
0.04450974613428116,
-0.011315442621707916,
-0.010174526832997799,
0.018810076639056206,
0.016932744532823563,
-0.030859142541885376,
-0.05975451320409775,
0.009514054283499718,
0.05260935425758362,
-0.02234664373099804,
0.028399808332324028,
0.015245740301907063,
-0.05999958887696266,
-0.01994161866605282,
-0.07713977992534637,
-0.00769979041069746,
-0.04404700547456741,
0.02728094533085823,
0.06043248251080513,
0.07770230621099472,
-0.005264308303594589,
-0.002671286463737488,
0.04379812255501747,
0.0010643588611856103,
-0.023758338764309883,
-0.05618459731340408,
-0.05748908221721649,
-0.01892862282693386,
-0.10033252090215683,
-0.029861459508538246,
3.9474646810367715e-33,
-0.0021247707773,
0.027008844539523125,
-0.00518793473020196,
-0.05813075229525566,
0.031198490411043167,
0.01921992376446724,
0.019092725589871407,
-0.0014371145516633987,
-0.0153412576764822,
0.047616250813007355,
-0.03893760219216347,
-0.03192251920700073,
-0.0061700246296823025,
-0.05678460747003555,
-0.03626147657632828,
-0.14740991592407227,
-0.0001946233824128285,
0.0330306701362133,
-0.053962770849466324,
-0.04859558120369911,
0.02556811459362507,
0.009109171107411385,
-0.0256301648914814,
-0.010697825811803341,
0.06363976001739502,
0.01459027361124754,
0.027808452025055885,
-0.05052149295806885,
-0.0672137662768364,
0.005688801407814026,
-0.02114374190568924,
0.021214138716459274,
0.036192260682582855,
0.05118604004383087,
-0.010011004284024239,
-0.03291067108511925,
-0.034185826778411865,
-0.004461532458662987,
0.014761758968234062,
0.05319531261920929,
0.031068265438079834,
0.059056077152490616,
0.014719930477440357,
0.003400245914235711,
0.06621401011943817,
-0.040117718279361725,
-0.011881214566528797,
0.039227645844221115,
-0.024593248963356018,
-0.034906066954135895,
-0.021675610914826393,
0.08322767913341522,
0.026170499622821808,
-0.004217750858515501,
-0.034173037856817245,
-0.03239619359374046,
0.09073200821876526,
0.007924516685307026,
0.07668010145425797,
0.05766357481479645,
-0.012169266119599342,
0.05809533968567848,
-0.04348614811897278,
0.08168813586235046,
0.04924262315034866,
-0.0034588100388646126,
0.018986010923981667,
0.0471469908952713,
0.04150213673710823,
-0.029438873752951622,
-0.0576595813035965,
0.009300083853304386,
0.05515218898653984,
-0.02015981264412403,
-0.000485223630676046,
0.027905454859137535,
0.033672068268060684,
0.033079616725444794,
0.03495291247963905,
-0.05760382488369942,
-0.045812878757715225,
0.04195554554462433,
0.08239557594060898,
-0.043371446430683136,
0.10064973682165146,
-0.008484667167067528,
-0.028254875913262367,
-0.04114474356174469,
-0.01707593910396099,
0.03255000710487366,
0.07798172533512115,
0.037107791751623154,
-0.05970751866698265,
0.03080608882009983,
0.023844515904784203,
-2.766167612554245e-33,
0.03773316368460655,
0.052675761282444,
-0.055098842829465866,
-0.001488307723775506,
-0.06848549842834473,
-0.09438502788543701,
-0.030304590240120888,
-0.02761552855372429,
0.05884099379181862,
0.03392956033349037,
-0.022912725806236267,
0.004916159436106682,
0.03152778372168541,
-0.0209489855915308,
0.009699426591396332,
-0.0167750995606184,
0.06571075320243835,
-0.09680856019258499,
-0.051005393266677856,
-0.06420490890741348,
-0.00254714279435575,
-0.005593074019998312,
-0.01489708386361599,
-0.029931608587503433,
-0.11556946486234665,
0.05555694177746773,
-0.04130902141332626,
-0.07621543109416962,
0.0700482651591301,
0.027470795437693596,
-0.09894995391368866,
-0.05135433003306389,
-0.0033684989903122187,
-0.025721846148371696,
0.015207129530608654,
-0.03915277495980263,
0.049563344568014145,
0.1258874386548996,
0.09112705290317535,
-0.0887722298502922,
0.024746844545006752,
0.026134029030799866,
-0.06549236178398132,
0.016711367294192314,
-0.02890130691230297,
0.07637408375740051,
0.033235982060432434,
-0.0718364492058754,
0.01971839927136898,
0.029971705749630928,
0.025470711290836334,
0.02690008282661438,
-0.006599457003176212,
0.04808476194739342,
-0.003247507382184267,
0.009773594327270985,
0.09365417063236237,
-0.024885743856430054,
-0.08821229636669159,
0.045496176928281784,
0.09434369951486588,
0.10254720598459244,
0.029433617368340492,
0.018649840727448463,
0.022671783342957497,
0.04678204283118248,
-0.013276628218591213,
0.05982959270477295,
-0.010419653728604317,
-0.09730744361877441,
-0.016257742419838905,
0.08476275950670242,
0.028179295361042023,
-0.028963249176740646,
0.060799840837717056,
-0.08737275749444962,
-0.031603362411260605,
0.04851025342941284,
0.07598951458930969,
0.04620486497879028,
-0.00971504021435976,
0.0362139493227005,
-0.01917848363518715,
-0.020470863208174706,
0.12254565209150314,
-0.1153632402420044,
-0.04450944811105728,
0.031389009207487106,
0.043002642691135406,
-0.03289682790637016,
-0.07110302895307541,
0.0024379680398851633,
0.027880433946847916,
-0.00137047388125211,
0.01971764676272869,
-3.501174106190774e-8,
-0.02233695425093174,
0.054063618183135986,
-0.05324750021100044,
0.11928089708089828,
-0.009747977368533611,
-0.015540710650384426,
0.01112994272261858,
0.153486430644989,
0.014795048162341118,
-0.061492010951042175,
0.005344480276107788,
-0.03288475051522255,
-0.03755692020058632,
-0.017781147733330727,
0.03841143101453781,
-0.051764968782663345,
-0.03252699598670006,
-0.009365955367684364,
0.020785771310329437,
-0.09942075610160828,
0.030956503003835678,
-0.06570284068584442,
0.045250967144966125,
0.023109592497348785,
-0.10356064140796661,
0.05478069558739662,
0.0013994916807860136,
0.058312226086854935,
0.052112702280282974,
0.010910999961197376,
-0.09650855511426926,
-0.0543999969959259,
-0.02560177445411682,
0.07398609817028046,
0.06933194398880005,
-0.07816775143146515,
-0.038683921098709106,
0.04283519834280014,
0.03877723589539528,
0.00920112058520317,
-0.08024965226650238,
0.05043076351284981,
-0.03230103477835655,
0.03443901985883713,
-0.00841886643320322,
0.004506724886596203,
-0.13046708703041077,
0.007289686240255833,
-0.006991739850491285,
-0.05387244001030922,
0.016892101615667343,
0.012186195701360703,
0.025776177644729614,
0.05572051182389259,
0.07093314826488495,
0.024406349286437035,
0.11777038872241974,
-0.04191569983959198,
-0.09052940458059311,
0.043874818831682205,
0.027398625388741493,
-0.050530947744846344,
0.08096632361412048,
-0.059725116938352585
] | {
"pdf_file": "YEFBTIMFZUJ5QQSKCQ4LHUMSFR6KUQNO.pdf",
"text": "“Snake” Pipe & Building Demolition, Project S-W923\nTritium Process Pipe Removal\nChallenge - cost effective\nremoval of large amounts of\nT3-contaminated welded\nstainless steel piping located\nboth in and out sideSolution - Special cutting systems\navoid >1,500 ft3 of waste generation,\nreduce risks, and save >$600,000."
} |
[
-0.0038693740498274565,
0.0017507086740806699,
0.06822864711284637,
0.011725704185664654,
-0.023904522880911827,
0.09180445969104767,
-0.02191201224923134,
0.048206914216279984,
-0.10437697172164917,
-0.0021316520869731903,
0.04848076403141022,
-0.0064864447340369225,
0.0007835255819372833,
0.03326455131173134,
-0.04096398875117302,
0.00582231255248189,
0.06838417798280716,
-0.03595736250281334,
0.08077025413513184,
-0.05695616826415062,
-0.018008749932050705,
0.061835527420043945,
0.011189517565071583,
0.029360666871070862,
-0.04954086244106293,
0.03434686362743378,
-0.10405480861663818,
-0.020820990204811096,
-0.02957983687520027,
-0.02855491079390049,
0.0475413054227829,
-0.08854741603136063,
0.031330086290836334,
0.0018601175397634506,
0.0654570534825325,
0.037708982825279236,
0.08504843711853027,
0.04292605072259903,
-0.04254283383488655,
0.10851889848709106,
-0.04284609109163284,
0.04437316209077835,
-0.018388520926237106,
-0.002783181145787239,
0.016969794407486916,
0.006970687303692102,
-0.0014449912123382092,
-0.04944644868373871,
0.08177532255649567,
0.0587698332965374,
0.07118067890405655,
-0.022425349801778793,
0.05956743285059929,
0.038111090660095215,
0.004595090169459581,
0.017768962308764458,
-0.10080010443925858,
0.017056144773960114,
0.02456953376531601,
-0.04977238178253174,
-0.07740741968154907,
0.014428537338972092,
-0.053948309272527695,
-0.03321710601449013,
-0.049370624125003815,
0.03735418617725372,
-0.01443557720631361,
0.0010842290939763188,
0.1577371507883072,
-0.07495468109846115,
0.013659666292369366,
0.0459323488175869,
0.010882380418479443,
-0.013719487003982067,
-0.03132181242108345,
0.051119912415742874,
0.05212821811437607,
-0.03855806589126587,
0.07443487644195557,
-0.024044804275035858,
-0.013244004920125008,
-0.0004802694311365485,
0.07557152211666107,
0.02894119918346405,
-0.03324590250849724,
0.049573011696338654,
-0.003615981200709939,
-0.02275315299630165,
0.031384486705064774,
-0.08143988996744156,
0.058330051600933075,
0.0030157535802572966,
-0.037862010300159454,
0.03796643391251564,
0.0022574218455702066,
-0.008467142470180988,
-0.014357445761561394,
0.019740190356969833,
-0.00006675433542113751,
0.05980243533849716,
-0.051033612340688705,
-0.08099948614835739,
-0.04154418781399727,
0.007691703271120787,
-0.017495421692728996,
-0.08618491142988205,
-0.042643893510103226,
-0.00008311907004099339,
0.010106686502695084,
0.012169469147920609,
0.041855037212371826,
0.016331344842910767,
0.05070064216852188,
0.0011097465176135302,
-0.00928355474025011,
0.04907727614045143,
0.04294133558869362,
-0.032025277614593506,
0.032134708017110825,
0.023735178634524345,
0.023709312081336975,
-0.01755453459918499,
-0.0160052627325058,
-0.06027643755078316,
0.010611990466713905,
0.005468433722853661,
0.016843212768435478,
1.2156044955926487e-32,
0.008382595144212246,
0.0014465504791587591,
0.08214525133371353,
0.06992761045694351,
0.03890221565961838,
-0.0881449282169342,
0.002204109914600849,
0.006312123499810696,
0.007757870014756918,
-0.05489585921168327,
-0.026389319449663162,
-0.030069928616285324,
0.01625249907374382,
-0.049492813646793365,
-0.12361264228820801,
-0.04794800281524658,
0.010323488153517246,
-0.005933033302426338,
-0.06883946061134338,
0.0323818139731884,
-0.10813764482736588,
-0.044057078659534454,
-0.030129017308354378,
0.005136799532920122,
0.0015957104042172432,
0.08611974865198135,
-0.04942755401134491,
0.08850578963756561,
0.07944191247224808,
0.00737044308334589,
-0.003824788611382246,
-0.015561012551188469,
-0.0021516894921660423,
-0.007696235552430153,
0.013925284147262573,
0.017988717183470726,
0.04707196727395058,
-0.03703656792640686,
-0.07336028665304184,
-0.09032847732305527,
0.02914774790406227,
0.05548228695988655,
-0.06430147588253021,
0.02623562328517437,
0.10751901566982269,
-0.0716312825679779,
-0.0038363668136298656,
-0.026594605296850204,
0.09289579838514328,
-0.002883075037971139,
-0.022580621764063835,
-0.0024233723524957895,
-0.09785466641187668,
-0.04164713993668556,
0.0028892764821648598,
-0.00030107604106888175,
-0.03595518693327904,
0.022879136726260185,
0.04545852541923523,
0.01415671780705452,
0.09447764605283737,
0.02802617847919464,
-0.015701359137892723,
-0.07180693745613098,
0.04800080135464668,
-0.16607566177845,
-0.028689006343483925,
-0.044186513870954514,
0.035194724798202515,
-0.01019127294421196,
0.01159881055355072,
0.0013986962148919702,
0.007068779319524765,
-0.04158548638224602,
0.018105696886777878,
0.034430671483278275,
0.026478929445147514,
0.015964629128575325,
0.037615153938531876,
0.03110775351524353,
-0.010612739250063896,
-0.0630723387002945,
0.02393125183880329,
0.0711422935128212,
0.034230973571538925,
-0.10935734957456589,
0.013269065879285336,
-0.0910034254193306,
-0.08431367576122284,
0.009721001610159874,
-0.015845637768507004,
0.07834590971469879,
0.01024644821882248,
-0.02495351992547512,
-0.08073659986257553,
-1.1786966913075151e-32,
-0.012669558636844158,
0.03082229569554329,
-0.005013471934944391,
-0.011689414270222187,
-0.019777411594986916,
0.05974601209163666,
0.04752032458782196,
0.010870568454265594,
0.06922692805528641,
0.02666604146361351,
0.017404377460479736,
-0.0642595961689949,
0.0039034432265907526,
-0.011068223044276237,
-0.061109621077775955,
0.0360548235476017,
0.023747488856315613,
0.08770358562469482,
-0.07110712677240372,
0.020074976608157158,
-0.032589882612228394,
0.06611806154251099,
-0.07622605562210083,
-0.05791037529706955,
0.021446334198117256,
0.02487754449248314,
0.02845773845911026,
0.08447028696537018,
0.017858916893601418,
-0.02036135457456112,
-0.04261861369013786,
-0.02031656540930271,
0.026023931801319122,
0.10519476979970932,
-0.04627162590622902,
0.03875654935836792,
0.06837977468967438,
0.027712667360901833,
-0.021986493840813637,
-0.09379469603300095,
0.039416585117578506,
-0.12310844659805298,
-0.0412791483104229,
0.003961041569709778,
-0.006316592916846275,
0.06477294862270355,
0.0321495495736599,
0.0772552415728569,
0.036495182663202286,
0.08272890001535416,
-0.05248449742794037,
-0.0008805273100733757,
-0.052341386675834656,
0.0705593153834343,
0.014883925206959248,
-0.02206634357571602,
0.07117621600627899,
-0.07921288162469864,
-0.023660169914364815,
0.036144014447927475,
0.05005396157503128,
-0.020195281133055687,
-0.10226795822381973,
0.09398727864027023,
0.046288248151540756,
-0.05618423968553543,
0.012732965871691704,
-0.032649196684360504,
-0.02514258213341236,
-0.027893397957086563,
0.046048231422901154,
0.031202102079987526,
0.09395812451839447,
-0.16791407763957977,
-0.07092874497175217,
-0.012225496582686901,
0.058372389525175095,
0.019107941538095474,
-0.03561950847506523,
-0.043002523481845856,
0.04586198925971985,
-0.08126497268676758,
-0.033538300544023514,
0.038765840232372284,
-0.0031550105195492506,
0.06370111554861069,
0.09244929999113083,
-0.013837709091603756,
-0.03238411620259285,
0.042171966284513474,
-0.05868792161345482,
0.03414151817560196,
-0.05190194770693779,
0.052339013665914536,
-0.07541670650243759,
-6.59142500580856e-8,
0.13205133378505707,
-0.006799777038395405,
-0.00745689682662487,
0.0014470306923612952,
0.03154464066028595,
0.05486506596207619,
-0.03467842936515808,
-0.03998744860291481,
-0.009396868757903576,
0.13361041247844696,
-0.03128322586417198,
0.06707219034433365,
0.008228681050240993,
-0.08438503742218018,
0.028304362669587135,
-0.04809128865599632,
-0.10482364892959595,
0.006328671704977751,
-0.05239618197083473,
0.04094057157635689,
-0.059648547321558,
-0.02291002869606018,
0.025340912863612175,
-0.035995084792375565,
0.03407500311732292,
-0.07843480259180069,
-0.01902271807193756,
0.04285312443971634,
-0.0010910476557910442,
-0.07895442098379135,
-0.01631738245487213,
0.03644600510597229,
-0.022714242339134216,
-0.025901498273015022,
-0.043395716696977615,
-0.056152377277612686,
-0.04069756343960762,
0.07524827122688293,
-0.0046359519474208355,
0.018121734261512756,
0.04466984421014786,
-0.04915976524353027,
0.02404908649623394,
0.009663525968790054,
-0.009915553964674473,
-0.011003508232533932,
0.03034275956451893,
-0.05918038263916969,
0.0641646757721901,
-0.050817154347896576,
-0.03726230189204216,
-0.026409374549984932,
0.05502099171280861,
-0.08813124150037766,
-0.08581822365522385,
0.08263221383094788,
0.01692098006606102,
-0.07793400436639786,
0.028689170256257057,
-0.0016500569181516767,
-0.00918528251349926,
-0.0652235597372055,
-0.08399031311273575,
0.02424023486673832
] | {
"pdf_file": "CS7K5VMMTMSYHTHKLFYD7QC7EFIEPHKX.pdf",
"text": "List of H1N1 Vaccination Clinics \nJanuary 19, 2010 \nPage 1 of 12 \nBeacon Falls \n \nBeacon Falls Senior Center 57 North Main Street Beacon Falls, CT 06403 203-881-3255 Date: 1/21/2010 Time: 10:00 a. m. to 12 noon \nBerlin \n \nWillard Elementary School 1088 Norton Road Berlin, CT 06037 860-721-2822 Date: 1/20/2010 Time: 4:00 p. m. to 7:00 p. m. \nBethel \n \nCJH Municipal Center 1 School Street Bethel, CT 06801 203-794-8539 \nDate: 1/21/2010 Time: 3:00 p. m. to 5:30 p. m. \n1/28/2010 Time: 3:00 p. m. to 5:30 p. m. \n Notes: Pre-registration requi red. Call 203-794-8539, or email: \nbhdadmin@betheltownhall.org \nBolton \n \nBolton Senior Center 104 Notch Road Bolton, CT 06043 860-721-2822 Date: 1/28/2010 Time: 2:30 p. m. to 4:30 p. m. List of H1N1 Vaccination Clinics \nJanuary 19, 2010 \nPage 2 of 12 \nBridgeport \n \nCity of Bridgeport Dept of Health 758 East Main Street Bridgeport, CT 06608 203-576-8242 Date: 10/21/2009 (ongoing) Time : 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. \n \nBrookfield \n \nWhisconier Middle School 17 West Whisconier Road Brookfield, CT 06804 203-775-7710 Date: 1/25/2010 Time: 4:30 p. m. to 6:00 p. m. \nBrooklyn \n \nNortheast District Department of Health 69 South Main Street, Unit 4 Brooklyn, CT 06234 860-774-7350 \nDate: 1/23/2010 Time: 2:00 p. m. to 4:00 p. m. \n2/6/2010 Time: 2:00 p. m. to 4:00 p. m. \n \nBurlington \n \nLewis Mills High School Lyons Road Burlington, CT 06013 860-489-0436 Date: 1/21/2010 Time: 3:00 p. m. to 6:00 p. m. \nCenterbrook \n \nVisting Nurses of the Lower Valley 61 Main Street Centerbrook, CT 06409 860-767-0186 Date: 1/20/2010 Time: 3:00 p. m. to 6:00 p. m. List of H1N1 Vaccination Clinics \nJanuary 19, 2010 \nPage 3 of 12 \n \nCheshire \n \nChesprocott Health District 1247 Highland Avenue Cheshire, CT 06410 203-272-2761 Date: 1/21/2010 Time: 2:00 p. m. to 4:00 p. m. Notes: Pre-registration re quired. Please call 203-272-2761 \n \nChester \n \nChester Town Hall 203 Middlesex Avenue Chester, CT 06412 860-767-0186 Date: 1/19/2010 Time: 4:00 p. m. to 7:00 p. m. \nCoventry \n \nCoventry Senior Center 124 Lake Street \nCoventry, CT 06238 \n860-721-2822 Date: 1/27/2010 Time: 10:30 a.m. to 1:00 p. m. \nDanbury \n \nRogers Park Middle School 21 Memorial Drive Danbury, CT 06810 203-792-4120 Date: 1/20/2010 Time: 4:00 p. m to 6:00 p. m. Notes: Seasonal flu vaccine also available. List of H1N1 Vaccination Clinics \nJanuary 19, 2010 \nPage 4 of 12 Danbury (continued) \n \nDanbury VNA Offices 4 Liberty Street Danbury, CT 06810 203-792-4120 Date: 1/21/2010 Time: 3:00 p. m. to 6:00 p. m. 1/28/2010 Time: 3:00 p. m. to 6:00 p. m. Notes: Seasonal flu vaccine also available. Danbury PAL 35 Hayestown Road Danbury, CT 06811 203-792-4120 Date: 1/26/2010 Time: 1:30 p. m. to 3:00 p. m. Notes: Seasonal flu vaccine also available. \nDerby \n \nDerby Senior Center 293 Main Street \nDerby, CT 06418 \n203-881-3255 Date: 1/26/2010 Time: 2:00 p. m. to 4:00 p. m. \nEast Hartford \n \nEast Hartford High School 869 Forbest Street East Hartford, CT 06118 860-291-7324 Date: 1/20/2010 Time: 1:00 p. m. to 6:00 p. m. O'Brien Elementary School 56 Farm Drive East Hartford, CT 06108 860-622-5760 Date: 1/28/2010 Time: 1:30 p. m. to 6:00 p. m. List of H1N1 Vaccination Clinics \nJanuary 19, 2010 \nPage 5 of 12 East Hartford (continued) \n \nSouth End Senior Center 70 Canterbury Street East Hartford, CT 06118 860-291-7324 Date: 2/2/2010 Time: 9:00 a. m. to 12:00 noon Notes: Aged 65 and over preferred \nGreenwich \n \nGreenwich Town Hall 101 Field Point Road Greenwich, CT 06830 203-622-3774 Date: 1/21/2010 Time: 3:00 p. m. to 6:00 p. m. \nGroton \n \nFitch High School 101 Groton Long Point Road Groton, CT 06340 860-448-4882 \n \nDate: 1/20/2010 Time: 5:00 p. m. to 8:00 p. m. \nHartford \n \nMetzner Center 680 Franklin Avenue Hartford, CT 06114 860-543-8826 4:00 p.m. Date: 1/19/2010 Time: 4:00 p. m. to 6:00 p. m. List of H1N1 Vaccination Clinics \nJanuary 19, 2010 \nPage 6 of 12 \nJewett City \n \nGriswold Senior Center 22 Soule Street Jewett City, CT 06351 860-823-1189 Date: 1/21/2010 Time: 1:00 p. m. to 3:00 p. m. Notes: Appointment requests by email available at H1N1@uncashd.org \nLitchfield \n \nFernwood Rest Home, Inc. 400 Torrington Road Litchfield, CT 06759 860-489-0436 Date: 1/20/2010 Time: 9:00 a. m. to 11:00 a. m. \nMadison \n \nMadison Town Campus 8 Campus Drive Madison, CT 06443 \n203-481-4235 \n Date: 1/19/2010 Time: 3:00 p. m. to 6:00 p. m. \nManchester \n \nManchester Senior Center 549 East Middle Turnpike Manchester, CT 06040 860-647-3196 Date: 1/26/2010 Time: 5:00 p. m. to 7:00 p. m. List of H1N1 Vaccination Clinics \nJanuary 19, 2010 \nPage 7 of 12 \nMeriden \n \nMeriden Health Department 165 Miller Street Meriden, CT 06450 203-630-4234 Date: 10/22/2009 (ongoing) Time : 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. \n \nMilford \n \nWestfield Shoppingtown (Post Mall) 1201 Boston Post Road Milford, CT 06460 203-783-3285 Date: 1/21/2010 Time: 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p. m. \n1/26/2010 Time: 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p. m. 1/28/2010 Time: 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p. m. \n Notes: Lower level near Target entrance \nNew Haven \n \nNew Haven Health Department \n54 Meadow Street - 1st Floor \nNew Haven, CT 06519 203-946-6999 Date: 1/26/2010 Time: 9:30 a. m. to 12 noon \n1/28/2010 Time: 5:30 p. m. to 7:30 p. m. \n Notes: Pre-registration required. Call 203-946-8178. \n \nNewington \n \nNewington High School 605 Willard Avenue Newington, CT 06111 860-721-2822 Date: 1/21/2010 Time: 4:00 p. m. to 7:00 p. m. List of H1N1 Vaccination Clinics \nJanuary 19, 2010 \nPage 8 of 12 \nNorwalk \n \nNorwalk Health Department 137 East Avenue Norwalk, CT 06851 203-854-7824 Date: 1/19/2010 Time: 2:00 p. m. to 4:00 p. m. \n1/21/2010 Time: 2:00 p. m. to 4:00 p. m. 1/26/2010 Time: 2:00 p. m. to 4:00 p. m. 1/28/2010 Time: 2:00 p. m. to 4:00 p. m. 2/2/2010 Time: 2:00 p. m. to 4:00 p. m. \n \nPutnam \n \nPutnam Middle School 35 Wicker Street Putnam, CT 06260 860-774-7350 Date: 1/20/2010 Time: 3:00 p. m. to 6:00 p.m. \nRocky Hill \n \nRocky Hill Community Center \n55 Church Street \nRocky Hill, CT 06067 860-721-2822 Date: 1/26/2010 Time: 9:00 a.m. to 12 noon \nShelton \n \nSt. Margaret Mary Alacoque Parish 380 Long Hill Avenue Shelton, CT 06464 203-881-3255 Date: 2/4/2010 Time: 9:30 a. m. to 11:30 a. m. List of H1N1 Vaccination Clinics \nJanuary 19, 2010 \nPage 9 of 12 Shelton (continued) \n \nShelton Senior Center 81 Wheeler Street Shelton, CT 06464 203-294-9324 Date: 2/17/2010 Time: 9:30 a. m. to 11:30 a. m. Notes: Aged 55 and over preferred; pre-registration re quired. Call 203-294-9324 \n \nSouthbury \n \nPomperaug District Health Department 800 Main St. South Southbury, CT 06488 203 264-9616 Date: 1/21/2010 Time: 4:00 p. m. to 5:30 p. m. Notes: Pre-registration re quired. Call (203) 264-9616 \n \nSouthington \n \nSouthington Health Department 93 Main Street, 2nd Floor Annex \nSouthington, CT 06489 \n860-276-6275 Date: 1/20/2010 Time: 12 noon to 1:15 p. m. \n1/21/2010 Time: 5:30 p. m. to 6:45 p. m. 1/27/2010 Time: 12 noon to 1:15 p. m. 1/28/2010 Time: 5:30 p. m.. to 6:45 p. m. 2/3/2010 Time: 12 noon to 1:15 p. m. 2/4/2010 Time: 5:30 p. m. to 6:45 p. m. 2/10/2010 Time: 12 noon to 1:15 p. m. 2/11/2010 Time: 5:30 p. m. to 6:45 p. m. 2/17/2010 Time: 12 noon to 1:15 p. m. 2/18/2010 Time: 5:30 p. m. to 6:45 p. m. 2/24/2010 Time: 12 noon to 1:15 p. m. 2/25/2010 Time: 5:30 p. m. to 6:45 p. m. \n Notes: Pre-registration required. Call 860-276-6275 List of H1N1 Vaccination Clinics \nJanuary 19, 2010 \nPage 10 of 12 \nStratford \n \nStratford Health Department 468 Birdseye Street Stratford, CT 06615 203-385-4058 Date: 1/20/2010 Time: 3:00 p. m. to 7:00 p. m. Notes: Pre-registration re quired. Please call 203-385-4040. \n \nSuffield \n \nSuffield Ambulance Building 205 Bridge Street Suffield, CT 06078 860-745-0383 Date: 2/3/2010 Time: 4:30 p. m. to 6:30 p. m. \nTolland \n \nTolland Senior Center 674 Tolland Stage Road Tolland, CT 06084 \n860-870-3730 \n Date: 1/29/2010 Time: 10:00 a. m. to 11:00 a. m. \nTorrington \n \nTorrington Area Health District 350 Main Street Torrington, CT 06790 860-489-0436 Date: 1/22/2010 Time: 11:00 a. m. to 3:00 p. m. \n1/29/2010 Time: 11:00 a. m. to 3:00 p. m. List of H1N1 Vaccination Clinics \nJanuary 19, 2010 \nPage 11 of 12 \nWaterbury \n \nWaterbury Health Department 95 Scovill Street Waterbury, CT 06706 203-574-6780 Date: 1/20/2010 Time: 4:00 p. m to 7:00 p. m. \n1/27/2010 Time: 4:00 p. m to 7:00 p. m. \n Notes: Pre-registration requi red. Call 203-574-6780, or email \nhealthdesk@waterburyct.org \nWest Haven \n \nWest Haven Health Department 355 Main Street - 2nd Floor West Haven, CT 06516 203-996-3233 Date: 1/19/2010 Time: 2:30 p. m. to 5:00 p. m. \n1/21/2010 Time: 4:30 p. m. to 6:30 p. m. 1/23/2010 Time: 12 noon to 3:30 p. m. 1/26/2010 Time: 2:30 p. m. to 5:00 p. m. 1/28/2010 Time: 4:30 p. m. to 6:30 p. m. \n \nWestport \n \nWestport-Weston Health District 180 Bayberry Lane Westport, CT 06880 203-227-9571 Date: 1/20/2010 Time: 2:00 p. m. to 4:00 p. m. \n1/27/2010 Time: 2:00 p. m. to 4:00 p. m. \n \nWethersfield \n \nPitkin Community Center 30 Greenfield Street Wethersfield, CT 06109 860-721-2822 Date: 1/28/2010 Time: 4:00 p. m. to 7:00 p. m. List of H1N1 Vaccination Clinics \nJanuary 19, 2010 \nPage 12 of 12 \nWinsted \n \nPearson School 2 Wetmore Avenue Winsted, CT 06098 860-489-0436 Date: 1/26/2010 Time: 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p. m. Blanche McCarthy Senior Center 80 Holabird Avenue Winsted, CT 06098 860-489-0436 Date: 1/28/2010 Time: 1:30 p. m. to 3:30 p. m. \n \n \nThe Gilbert School Williams Avenue Winsted, CT 06098 860-489-0436 Date: 2/10/2010 Time: 10:00 a. m. to 2:00 p. m. "
} |
[
-0.09759721159934998,
0.018889976665377617,
0.08284701406955719,
-0.06456732004880905,
0.03176724910736084,
0.085063636302948,
-0.04364005848765373,
0.050862524658441544,
0.04091576114296913,
0.05049460753798485,
0.05246821045875549,
0.08141249418258667,
0.0034558954648673534,
-0.0720798447728157,
0.04575292766094208,
0.011415855959057808,
0.0007287506014108658,
0.04028697311878204,
-0.050812821835279465,
0.11068875342607498,
0.09420030564069748,
0.05952095985412598,
-0.04328818991780281,
0.047797512263059616,
-0.013177124783396721,
-0.03923923149704933,
-0.015087883919477463,
-0.04598231241106987,
0.0037168823182582855,
-0.02649836242198944,
-0.00766922440379858,
0.05209757387638092,
0.0016822128091007471,
0.034416910260915756,
0.043205562978982925,
-0.0713130533695221,
0.07442479580640793,
-0.03876330703496933,
0.036923959851264954,
0.02120164968073368,
-0.017445513978600502,
-0.015179244801402092,
-0.05394620820879936,
0.031388238072395325,
0.000512614322360605,
0.07903263717889786,
0.0053529017604887486,
0.010774113237857819,
-0.1294594705104828,
0.06637953221797943,
-0.07769779115915298,
-0.007869348861277103,
-0.034982435405254364,
0.08722935616970062,
0.03153951093554497,
-0.021942581981420517,
-0.03858821839094162,
0.014329212717711926,
0.04759969189763069,
-0.020765824243426323,
0.07633522152900696,
-0.02331920713186264,
-0.05756926164031029,
-0.06698965281248093,
-0.07024367898702621,
-0.03484368696808815,
0.03449664264917374,
-0.041967034339904785,
-0.10102423280477524,
0.09435375779867172,
0.01967836543917656,
0.049263838678598404,
0.00611920328810811,
0.01952369511127472,
-0.07633756101131439,
-0.029647083953022957,
0.03838694840669632,
0.13206228613853455,
0.04166894406080246,
-0.11119076609611511,
-0.04747059941291809,
-0.008419957011938095,
0.024382775649428368,
-0.06812029331922531,
0.013537421822547913,
-0.07757358253002167,
-0.07430952787399292,
-0.04193110391497612,
0.10500994324684143,
0.04976993054151535,
0.008811463601887226,
-0.14899417757987976,
-0.013092422857880592,
-0.007109889294952154,
0.0657532587647438,
-0.00614708149805665,
0.03616703674197197,
-0.0331057570874691,
0.10582243651151657,
0.05954672768712044,
-0.004906741436570883,
0.018378324806690216,
-0.061270393431186676,
-0.007156624924391508,
0.05808757245540619,
-0.04727699235081673,
-0.06528123468160629,
-0.036384597420692444,
0.023038936778903008,
-0.04865018650889397,
0.05683056265115738,
-0.06638537347316742,
0.08289989084005356,
-0.045357368886470795,
0.0017014546319842339,
-0.004453965462744236,
0.035728227347135544,
0.03959110006690025,
0.04982196167111397,
-0.07228250056505203,
0.03956678882241249,
0.06882024556398392,
-0.004305507522076368,
0.027065446600317955,
-0.009600265882909298,
0.05869905650615692,
-0.06248073652386665,
1.6870687576161778e-33,
-0.018933597952127457,
-0.07212981581687927,
0.003916459623724222,
-0.006229853257536888,
0.03937257081270218,
-0.03134138509631157,
-0.037607595324516296,
-0.010963572189211845,
-0.03513207286596298,
-0.04125482216477394,
0.016110047698020935,
-0.031650230288505554,
0.06476763635873795,
-0.04311978444457054,
-0.00686649139970541,
-0.05280201509594917,
-0.005102201830595732,
0.05905485898256302,
0.04987240582704544,
0.03406279534101486,
0.06458672881126404,
0.0320008285343647,
-0.0034651891328394413,
0.02237132005393505,
-0.03788425028324127,
-0.0006895219557918608,
0.007897687144577503,
-0.010568988509476185,
-0.050372179597616196,
0.0015896862605586648,
-0.0368175134062767,
0.0038826344534754753,
0.04158009961247444,
0.005292240064591169,
-0.00806702021509409,
-0.047517601400613785,
0.0012177787721157074,
-0.045207779854536057,
-0.02105879597365856,
-0.0741286352276802,
0.03398881480097771,
0.07113201916217804,
-0.06471222639083862,
-0.020590536296367645,
0.005489791743457317,
-0.0162159763276577,
-0.01413311529904604,
0.03770681098103523,
0.037080761045217514,
-0.011925986036658287,
-0.01899038627743721,
0.05207844078540802,
0.08764264732599258,
-0.01539599895477295,
-0.033222466707229614,
-0.009673139080405235,
-0.10052112489938736,
0.008242855779826641,
-0.01925821602344513,
-0.02171751670539379,
0.006688717752695084,
0.06865458190441132,
0.0441758818924427,
0.07011139392852783,
-0.015397806651890278,
0.02509833313524723,
-0.0444650873541832,
0.0349130816757679,
0.0003530732064973563,
-0.0730365738272667,
-0.036326814442873,
-0.006379928905516863,
-0.07005546241998672,
-0.007358628790825605,
-0.027114536613225937,
-0.02385174296796322,
0.007413816172629595,
0.0010741953738033772,
-0.01744120754301548,
-0.1371588408946991,
-0.10473959147930145,
0.02253609523177147,
0.05453106760978699,
0.024569541215896606,
0.002292823512107134,
-0.039284609258174896,
0.02087104693055153,
0.0125877121463418,
0.07150948792695999,
-0.07660975307226181,
0.004339930135756731,
-0.050327904522418976,
-0.025027938187122345,
0.03658613935112953,
0.10248211026191711,
-2.6672640892699503e-33,
0.0108018284663558,
-0.07173984497785568,
-0.05832304805517197,
0.02597132697701454,
0.01478378102183342,
0.032313596457242966,
-0.01386975310742855,
-0.09617634862661362,
-0.006580796558409929,
-0.18753096461296082,
-0.03968558833003044,
-0.014553084038197994,
-0.02062593214213848,
0.0888352245092392,
0.006587758660316467,
-0.0005786588881164789,
-0.0649181604385376,
-0.007449308875948191,
-0.000867295078933239,
0.051107313483953476,
0.045185577124357224,
-0.012369094416499138,
0.026275068521499634,
0.045040350407361984,
-0.019242793321609497,
0.004257481545209885,
-0.0021666723769158125,
0.017267920076847076,
-0.0036041978746652603,
-0.012513353489339352,
-0.057299379259347916,
-0.04286368563771248,
-0.06030530110001564,
0.005978594068437815,
0.07472477108240128,
-0.08995833247900009,
0.029222797602415085,
0.014186608605086803,
-0.015178157016634941,
0.052490394562482834,
0.053364865481853485,
0.01895485818386078,
0.07314679026603699,
0.05874529108405113,
0.009535806253552437,
-0.015299119986593723,
0.006797985173761845,
0.02703300677239895,
-0.0815667137503624,
-0.044656720012426376,
-0.04691368341445923,
-0.026071008294820786,
0.07145315408706665,
0.02763942815363407,
-0.038204871118068695,
0.006042612716555595,
0.04242366552352905,
-0.04888037219643593,
0.021830998361110687,
0.054095253348350525,
0.06468161940574646,
0.06324229389429092,
-0.004489854909479618,
-0.018135923892259598,
0.08859452605247498,
0.047598350793123245,
-0.09149405360221863,
-0.036724913865327835,
0.08211775124073029,
-0.05024620518088341,
-0.03355369716882706,
-0.09911400824785233,
-0.04528666287660599,
0.040561702102422714,
0.06900540739297867,
-0.0040693990886211395,
0.1105055958032608,
0.012694335542619228,
-0.06419935822486877,
-0.013326579704880714,
-0.05645954981446266,
-0.00005139343556948006,
-0.024602223187685013,
-0.01462129969149828,
0.0035649605561047792,
-0.004162125289440155,
0.024865956977009773,
0.005108932498842478,
0.05607307702302933,
0.017193302512168884,
-0.04417925328016281,
0.05053172633051872,
0.0044572437182068825,
0.051523637026548386,
-0.039986927062273026,
-6.802258667448768e-8,
-0.08537748456001282,
0.016196830198168755,
-0.13618473708629608,
0.06150214746594429,
0.07462871074676514,
-0.06503967940807343,
0.0032592311035841703,
-0.009290444664657116,
-0.05699155852198601,
-0.038786519318819046,
0.0840904489159584,
0.09537176787853241,
0.058079808950424194,
-0.05977877229452133,
-0.023928431794047356,
-0.007770817261189222,
-0.04865734651684761,
-0.1159626916050911,
-0.057331256568431854,
0.10970386862754822,
-0.02294239029288292,
-0.00906345248222351,
0.047354452311992645,
-0.043393444269895554,
0.026239672675728798,
0.04722784087061882,
0.03270937502384186,
0.04549523815512657,
0.026260292157530785,
0.052526868879795074,
-0.00862365122884512,
0.06626546382904053,
0.0009684624965302646,
0.018489917740225792,
0.032167501747608185,
-0.023859955370426178,
-0.053379230201244354,
0.023763978853821754,
0.09375563263893127,
0.011773415841162205,
-0.007971329614520073,
-0.006533931475132704,
0.01786678470671177,
0.03720046579837799,
0.037634577602148056,
-0.06440260261297226,
-0.0857289507985115,
0.013983729295432568,
0.047467585653066635,
-0.022649746388196945,
-0.0735301673412323,
0.04983304813504219,
0.012625247240066528,
0.01722143031656742,
0.05829428508877754,
0.09783570468425751,
0.045720361173152924,
0.000477208464872092,
-0.022147640585899353,
-0.01186756044626236,
0.13737133145332336,
0.003157381433993578,
0.018850183114409447,
0.03611581400036812
] | {
"pdf_file": "4BYJ3SJ7LQLUQONSHK7CN7NJFWKW62CX.pdf",
"text": "8816DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §34\n15.See § 18.7, supra.\n16.See 8 Cannon's Precedents § 2941,\ncited in § 35.7, infra.\n17.See §§ 35.49, 35.78, 35.81, 35.93,\n35.95, infra.18.See § 35.78, infra.\n19.See, for example, §§ 35.23, 35.48,\n41.12, infra.\n20.See § 41.12, infra.\n1.See § 35.48, 35.69, infra.\n2.See §§ 35.16, 35.25, 41.5, infra.\nTo a bill amending one section of\nexisting law to accomplish a par-not precisely contemplated by existing\nlaw.Accordingly, the Chair sustains the\npoint of order.\nE. RELATION OF AMENDMENT OR BILL TO EXISTING LAW\n§35. Amendments to Bills\nWhich Amend Existing Law\nIt has been held that the rule of\ngermaneness applies to the rela-\ntionship between a proposed\namendment and the pending bill\nto which offered and not to the re-\nlation between such amendment\nand an existing title of the United\nStates Code which the pending\nbill seeks to amend,(15)except\nwhere the bill is a continuation or\nre-enactment of existing law, in\nwhich case amendments seeking\nto modify the law being extended\nin a germane manner may be ger-\nmane to the bill,(16)or where the\nbill so comprehensively or di-\nversely amends an existing law as\nto permit amendments which are\ngermane to other provisions of\nthat law.(17)Thus, the germane-\nness of an amendment that pro-\nposes to change existing law may\ndepend on the extent to which the\nbill itself seeks to change the law.\nA bill comprehensively amendingseveral sections of existing law\nmay be sufficiently broad in scope\nto admit as germane an amend-\nment which is germane to another\nsection of that law not amended\nby the bill.(18)But where a bill\namends existing law in one nar-\nrow particular, an amendment\nproposing to modify such existing\nlaw in other particulars will gen-\nerally be ruled out as not ger-\nmane.(19)As an example, if a bill\nseeks only to modify the penalty\nprovisions of a law proscribing\nspecified conduct, an amendment\nwill not be germane if it seeks to\nbroaden the scope or alter the ap-\nplicability of such law.(20)It is\ngenerally held, therefore, that, to\na bill amending existing law in\none particular, an amendment\nproposing to modify an unrelated\nsection of the law(1)or relating to\nterms of that law that are not re-\nferred to in the bill(2)is not ger-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01436 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8817AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\nticular purpose, an amendment pro-\nposing changes in another section of\nthat law in a manner not within the\nterms of the bill is not germane. See\nSec. 41.14, infra.\n3.See §§ 35.6, 35.77, 39.12, 39.13,\ninfra.\n4.See §§ 35.80, 35.91, 41.1, 41.2, infra.\n5.See § 42.43, infra.\n6.See the ruling of Chairman Warren\nG. Magnuson (Wash.) at 89 C ONG.REC. 1158, 78th Cong. 1st Sess., Feb.\n19, 1943. Under consideration was\nH.R. 1605 (Committee on Agri-\nculture), comprising an amendment\nto the Agricultural Adjustment Act\nof 1938. The bill is discussed more\nfully in § 35.2, infra.\n7.See § 35.70, infra.\n8.See §§ 35.19, 42.7, infra.\n9.See § 35.71, infra.\n10.See § 35.49, infra.\n11.See § 35.8, infra.mane. It may be said, then, that,\nto a bill amending one section of\nan existing law, an amendment\nproposing further modification of\nthe law, as by amending another\nsection of that law, is usually not\ngermane.(3)\nSimilarly, if a bill amends exist-\ning law in several respects, but re-\nlates to a single subject or has a\nsingle purpose, an amendment is\nnot germane that proposes to\nmodify the law further in a man-\nner not related to the purpose of\nthe bill.(4)\nTo a bill amending existing law\nin a limited respect, an amend-\nment repealing the law is not ger-\nmane. Accordingly, to a bill estab-\nlishing a new office within a gov-\nernment department, an amend-\nment to abolish the department is\nnot germane.(5)\nThe rule may be broadly stated\nthat, to a bill proposing solely to\namend one subtitle of an act, an\namendment is not germane which\nwould have the effect of repealing\nor amending other sections of the\nact that are not within the pur-\nview of the bill.(6)It has been held that where an\namendment to a bill proposes\nmodification of a section of exist-\ning law in some respects, an\namendment to the amendment\nmay properly propose modification\nof the same section of the law in\nother respects.(7)Thus, it is held\nthat, to a substitute amendment\nmodifying a section of existing\nlaw, an amendment further modi-\nfying that section may be ger-\nmane.(8)\nSimilarly, to an amendment in\nthe nature of a substitute, amend-\ning several sections of an existing\nlaw, an amendment proposing fur-\nther modification of one of the sec-\ntions sought to be amended has\nbeen held to be germane.(9)\nWhere a bill amends existing\nlaw in two unrelated respects, an\namendment proposing a third\nmodification may be germane.(10)\nTo a bill amending two sections\nof the Food Stamp Act of 1964, an\namendment proposing a change in\na third section of the act was held\ngermane.(11)\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01437 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8818DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n12.See §§ 35.30, 39.24, infra.\n13.See § 35.8, infra.\n14.See § 18.7, supra.\n15.See §§ 35.73, 35.74, infra.\n16.See § 35.44, infra.17.See Sec. 35.44, infra.\n18.See the ruling of Chairman Wilbur\nD. Mills (Ark.) at 97 C ONG. R EC.\n8325, 82d Cong. 1st Sess., July 17,\n1951.\n19.For discussion, see, for example, § 2;\nand see §§ 18 et seq., supra.\n20.See the proceedings of July 31, 1990,\nrelating to H.R. 1180, the Housing\nand Community Development Act,\ndiscussed in § 4.58, supra.To a bill re-enacting an existing\nlaw in modified form, an amend-\nment proposing further modifica-\ntion of that law may be ger-\nmane.(12)And where a bill nar-\nrowly amends only one section of\nexisting law, but is broadened by\namendment to alter another sec-\ntion of the law, a further amend-\nment to change still other sections\nof the law may be germane.(13)\nBut it should be noted that a\nbill amending several sections of\none title of the United States\nCode does not necessarily bring\nthe entire title under consider-\nation so as to permit an amend-\nment to any portion thereof.(14)\nEven where a bill amends an act\nin several particulars, an amend-\nment proposing further modifica-\ntion of the act in respects not re-\nlated to the subject of the bill is\nnot germane.(15)Thus, it has been\nheld that, to a bill amending an\nact in two particulars, an amend-\nment offered to amend the act in\na third particular but in a manner\nnot related to the bill is not ger-\nmane.(16)\nThe question for the Chair in\nsuch cases is whether the bill\namending existing law is of such ageneral or diverse nature as to\nfundamentally change the law in-\nvolved, and thereby open the law\ngenerally to amendments.(17)\nWhere the proposition under\nconsideration was to amend the\nDefense Production Act of 1950,\nan amendment proposing to add\nprovisions to such act, ``notwith-\nstanding any other provision of\nthis or any other law,'' was ruled\nout of order as an attempt to\namend other laws not under con-\nsideration.(18)\nOf course, an amendment must\nbe germane to that title or portion\nof the bill to which offered.(19)\nThus, the test of germaneness to a\npending title of a bill is the rela-\ntionship of the amendment to that\ntitle or to the law being amended\nby that title, and not to other por-\ntions of the bill not then pending\nfor amendment.(20)\nBut in some instances, due to\nthe scope and nature of the sub-\nject matter of a title of the bill\nsought to be amended, amend-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01438 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8819AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n1.See §§ 35.61 and 35.102, infra.\n2.108 C ONG. REC. 11314 et seq., 87th\nCong. 2d Sess.\n3.H.R. 11222 (Committee on Agri-\nculture).\n4.108 C ONG. R EC. 11205, 11206,\n11215±17, 11373, 87th Cong. 2d\nSess., June 20 and 21, 1962.ments thereto may be allowed\nwhich seek to modify laws not di-\nrectly amended by that title.\nThus, where a portion of a bill\namended several miscellaneous\nlaws on a general subject, an\namendment to another law relat-\ning to that subject was held to be\ngermane.(1)\n/fdash\nBill Amending Agriculture\nLawsÐAmendment Providing\nfor Expiration or Repeal of\nProvisions of Law\n§35.1 To a bill amending var-\nious laws relating to agri-\nculture, an amendment pro-\nviding that, three years after\nenactment, provisions of the\nbill would expire and other\nspecified agricultural legisla-\ntion be repealed, was held to\nbe germane.\nOn June 21, 1962,(2)the Com-\nmittee of the Whole had under\nconsideration the Food and Agri-\ncultural Bill of 1962,(3)which pro-\nvided in part as follows:(4)TITLE I ÐLAND -USE ADJUSTMENT\nSec. 101. The Soil Conservation and\nDomestic Allotment Act (49 Stat. 163),\nas amended, is further amended as fol-\nlows:\n(1) by repealing subsections (b), (c),\n(d), (e), (f), and (g) of section 7; ...\n(4) by adding a new subsection at\nthe end of section 16 of said Act to\nread as follows:\n``(e)(1) For the purpose of promoting\nthe conservation and economic use of\nland, the Secretary, without regard to\nthe foregoing provisions of this Act, ex-\ncept those relating to the use of the\nservices of State and local committees,\nis authorized to enter into agreements\n... with farm and ranch owners and\noperators providing for changes in\ncropping systems and land uses and\nfor practices or measures to be carried\nout on any lands owned or operated by\nthem for the purpose of conserving and\ndeveloping soil, water, forest, wildlife,\nand recreation resources. Such agree-\nments shall include such terms and\nconditions as the Secretary may deem\ndesirable to effectuate the purposes of\nthis subsection. ...\nSec. 102. Section 31 and subsection\n(e) of section 32 of title III of the\nBankhead-Jones Farm Tenant Act (50\nStat. 525), as amended, are amended\nto read as follows:\n``Sec. 31. The Secretary is authorized\nand directed to develop a program of\nland conservation and land utilization,\nincluding the more economic use of\nlands and the retirement of lands\nwhich are submarginal or not pri-\nmarily suitable for cultivation, in order\nthereby to correct maladjustments in\nland use, and thus assist in controlling\nsoil erosion, reforestation, providing\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01439 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8820DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\npublic recreation, preserving natural\nresources, protecting fish and wildlife\n... and protecting the public lands,\nhealth, safety, and welfare. ...\nSec. 103. The Watershed Protection\nand Flood Prevention Act (68 Stat.\n666), as amended, is amended as fol-\nlows:\n(1) Paragraph (1) of section 4 of said\nAct is amended by changing the semi-\ncolon at the end thereof to a colon and\nadding the following: `` Provided, That\nwhen a local organization agrees to op-\nerate and maintain any reservoir or\nother area included in a plan for public\nfish and wildlife or recreational devel-\nopment, the Secretary shall be author-\nized to bear not to exceed two-thirds of\nthe costs of (a) the land, easements, or\nrights-of-way acquired or to be ac-\nquired by the local organization for\nsuch reservoir or other area, and (b)\nminimum basic facilities needed for\npublic health and safety, access to, and\nuse of such reservoir or other area for\nsuch purposes. ...\nTITLE IIIÐMARKETING ORDERS\nSec. 301. The Agricultural Adjust-\nment Act, as reenacted and amended\nby the Agricultural Marketing Agree-\nment Act of 1937, as amended, is fur-\nther amended as follows:\nSection 8c(2) is amended byÐ\n(1) striking out in (A) thereof ``not in-\ncluding vegetables, other than aspar-\nagus, for canning or freezing)'' and in-\nserting in lieu thereof ``(not including\nvegetables, other than asparagus, for\ncanning or freezing, or potatoes for de-\nhydrating)''. ...\nTITLE IVÐCOMMODITY PROGRAMS\nSubtitle AÐFeed Grains\nSec. 401. Subtitle B of title III of the\nAgricultural Adjustment Act of 1938,as amended, is further amended by in-\nserting after part VI a new part VII as\nfollows:\n``PART VII ÐMARKETING QUOTAS ÐFEED\nGRAINS\n``LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS\n``Sec. 360a. The production of feed\ngrains is a vital part of the agricul-\ntural economy of the United\nStates. ...\n``Abnormally excessive and abnor-\nmally deficient supplies of feed grains\non the national market acutely and di-\nrectly burden, obstruct, and affect\ninterstate and foreign commerce. ...\n``NATIONAL MARKETING QUOTA\n``Sec. 360b. (a) Whenever prior to\nJune 20 in any calendar year the Sec-\nretary determines that the total supply\nof feed grains in the marketing year\nbeginning in the next succeeding cal-\nendar year will, in the absence of a\nmarketing quota program, likely be ex-\ncessive, the Secretary shall proclaim\nthat a national marketing quota for\nfeed grains shall be in effect for such\nmarketing year and for either the fol-\nlowing marketing year or the following\ntwo marketing years, if the Secretary\ndetermines and declares in such proc-\nlamation that a two- or three-year\nmarketing quota program is necessary\nto effectuate the policy of the Act. ...\n``NATIONAL ACREAGE ALLOTMENT\n``Sec. 360c. Whenever the amount of\nthe national marketing quota for feed\ngrains is proclaimed for any marketing\nyear, the Secretary at the same time\nshall proclaim a national acreage allot-\nment for the crop of feed grains plant-\ned for harvest in the calendar year in\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01440 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8821AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n5.108 C ONG. REC. 11377, 87th Cong.\n2d Sess., June 21, 1962. 6.Francis E. Walter (Pa.).which such marketing year be-\ngins. ...\nTITLE VÐG ENERAL PROVISIONS\nSec. 501. The Consolidated Farmers\nHome Administration Act of 1961 (75\nStat. 307) is amended as follows: . ..\n(2) By inserting in section 306(a)\nafter the words ``soil conservation prac-\ntices'' the words ``shifts in land use in-\ncluding the development of rec-\nreational facilities''. ...\nSec. 502. If any provision of this Act\nis declared unconstitutional, or the ap-\nplicability thereof to any person or cir-\ncumstance is held invalid, the validity\nof the remainder of this Act and the\napplicability thereof to other persons\nand circumstances shall not be affected\nthereby. ...\nAn amendment was offered\nwhich stated in part:(5)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [Craig]\nHosmer [of California]: On page 89,\nafter line 4, add the following:\nSec. 505. (a) All provisions of this\nAct except subsections (b) and (c) of\nthis section shall expire three years\nfollowing date of enactment and at\nthat time the following Acts are\nhereby repealed:\n(1) The Agricultural Act of 1949,\nas amended (7 U.S.C. 1421 and the\nfollowing), except sections 410, 411,\nand 414 thereof, effective with the\n1962 crops. ...\n(c) Notwithstanding other provi-\nsions of law the Commodity Credit\nCorporation is directed, on such\nterms and under such regulations as\nthe Secretary of Agriculture may\ndeem in the public interest, to sell\nall agricultural commodities andproducts thereof, now owned or here-\nafter acquired by it pursuant to any\nprice support program, at such rea-\nsonable prices as will result in the\norderly and complete disposition of\nsuch agricultural commodities and\nproducts.\nA point of order was made by\nMr. H. Carl Andersen, of Min-\nnesota, based on the contention\nthat the amendment went far be-\nyond the purview of the bill. The\nChairman(6)stated:\nThe Chair feels that the amendment\nis entirely proper and, therefore, over-\nrules the point of order.\nBill Amending Subtitle of Agri-\ncultural Adjustment ActÐ\nAmendment Relating to En-\nforcement of Penalty Provi-\nsions of Act\n§35.2 To a bill proposing to\namend one subtitle of the Ag-\nricultural Adjustment Act by\nadding a section relating to\nmethods and procedures of\ndetermining acreage allot-\nments for basic commodities,\nan amendment proposing\nmodification of an existing\nsection of such subtitle and\nrelating to jurisdiction of\ncourts in the enforcement of\npenalty provisions of the act\ngenerally, was held to be not\ngermane.\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01441 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8822DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n7.H.R. 1605 (Committee on Agri-\nculture).\n8.See 89 C ONG. REC. 1154, 1155, 78th\nCong. 1st Sess., Feb. 19, 1943.\n9.Id. at p. 1161.In the 78th Congress, a bill(7)\nwas under consideration which\nstated in part:(8)\nBe it enacted, etc., That part II of\nsubtitle C of title III of the Agricul-\ntural Adjustment Act of 1938, as\namended, is amended by inserting at\nthe end thereof the following new sec-\ntion:\nSec. 377. Notwithstanding any\nother provisions of this act, for any\nfarm . .. which has in 1942 an acre-\nage allotment for any commodity, ex-\ncept wheat, under the provisions of\nthis title, the allotment for any sub-\nsequent year shall not be reduced on\naccount of the failure to plant, har-\nvest, or market, in whole or part, the\ncommodity in any of the years begin-\nning February 1, 1943, and ending\nDecember 31 of the year in which\nthe President by proclamation or the\nCongress by concurrent resolution\ndeclares that hostilities in the\npresent war have terminated, if such\nfailure was due solely toÐ\n(1) The shifting from the produc-\ntion of the commodity to the produc-\ntion of one or more needed war\ncrops, in accordance with the request\nof the Secretary; or [other specified\ncauses]. ...\nThe following amendment was\noffered:(9)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [H.\nStreett] Baldwin of Maryland: On page\n1, line 4, after the last word ``amend-\ned'', strike out the balance of the sec-\ntion and insert in lieu thereof ``by\namending section 376 thereof by add-ing thereto the following: `Provided fur-\nther, That such jurisdiction shall in no\ncase be exercised as to any crop now\nplanted or planted hereafter between\nthe date of the enactment of this act\nand the date of the conclusion of\npeace.' ''\nA point of order was raised\nagainst the amendment, as fol-\nlows:\nMR. [H AMPTON P.] F ULMER [of South\nCarolina]: I do not believe [the amend-\nment] is in line with the real purpose\nof the bill, and it goes much further\nthan we intended under the bill, so it\nis not germane to the bill.\nIn support of the point of order,\nMr. Clifford R. Hope, of Kansas,\nstated:\nMr. Chairman, I call attention of the\nChair to the fact that section 376,\nwhich is sought to be amended, deals\nwith one subject, and one onlyÐthe ju-\nrisdiction of the courts in the enforce-\nment of the penalty provisions of the\nact. The provision in the bill under\nconsideration, while an amendment to\npart II of subtitle C, does not in any\nway go to the enforcement of the act,\nthrough the courts or otherwise, but\nsimply provides for a different method\nof making allotments to individual\nfarms in the case of the basic commod-\nities except wheat, and for making al-\nlotments to the counties and States in\nthe case of wheat. It is a new section\nand does not touch anything at all\nunder this subtitle except the method\nand procedure of making allotments. I\nsubmit that the amendment which the\ngentleman offers cannot be germane,\nbecause it applies only to the subject of\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01442 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8823AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n10.Warren G. Magnuson (Wash.).11.See 121 C ONG. R EC. 7388, 94th\nCong. 1st Sess., Mar. 20, 1975.court jurisdiction, which is not in any\nway involved in the committee provi-\nsion.\nThe Chairman(10)in ruling on\nthe point of order, stated:\nThe Chair is ready to rule and inter-\nprets the amendment of the gentleman\nfrom Maryland to involve the question\nof jurisdiction and enforcement of ju-\nrisdiction for the whole act. His\namendment provides that such juris-\ndiction shall in no case be exercised as\nto any crop. The bill before the Com-\nmittee restricts itself to certain crops.\nThe amendment of the gentleman from\nMaryland would in effect suspend ju-\nrisdiction to enforcing the entire Agri-\ncultural Adjustment Act, because it\nwould do away with the machinery for\nsuch suspension, and, therefore, the\nChair is inclined to rule that the\namendment is too far reaching, and\ngoes beyond the scope of the bill and is\nnot germane, and the Chair sustains\nthe point of order.\nAgricultural Price SupportsÐ\nAmendment Adding Com-\nmodity to Those Covered\n§35.3 To a bill amending a law\ndealing with several subjects\nwithin a definable class, an\namendment further amend-\ning that law to add another\nsubject within the same class\nis germane; thus, to a bill\ntemporarily amending for\none year an existing law es-\ntablishing price support lev-els for several agricultural\ncommodities, an amendment\nadding another agricultural\ncommodity to be covered by\nthe same provisions of law\nfor that year was held ger-\nmane.\nDuring consideration of H.R.\n4296 (a bill concerning emergency\nprice supports for 1975 crops) in\nthe Committee of the Whole, the\nChair overruled a point of order in\nthe circumstances described\nabove. The language of the bill to\nwhich the amendment was offered\nread as follows:(11)\nBe it enacted by the Senate and\nHouse of Representatives of the\nUnited States of America in Congress\nassembled, That title I of the Agri-\ncultural Act of 1949, as amended, is\namended by adding at the end there-\nof the following new section 108:\n``Sec. 108. (a) Notwithstanding sec-\ntions 103, 105, and 107 of this Act,\nthe established price for the 1975\ncrops of upland cotton, corn, and\nwheat shall be 48 cents per pound,\n$2.25 per bushel, and $3.10 per\nbushel, respectively, and the Sec-\nretary shall make available to pro-\nducers loans and purchases on the\n1975 crops of upland cotton, corn,\nand wheat at 40 cents per pound,\n$1.87 per bushel, and $2.50 per\nbushel, respectively; Provided, That\nthe rates of interest on commodity\nloans made by the Commodity Credit\nCorporation to all eligible producers\nshall be established quarterly on the\nbasis of the lowest current interest\nrate on ordinary obligations of the\nUnited States: Provided further ,\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01443 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8824DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n12.John Brademas (Ind.).\n13.121 C ONG. REC. 7652, 94th Cong. 1st\nSess.That the nonrecourse loan for 1975\ncrop upland cotton as set forth in\nsection 103(e)(1) of the Agricultural\nAct of 1949, as amended, shall be\nmade available for an additional\nterm of eight months at the option of\nthe cooperator.\n``(b) Notwithstanding the provi-\nsions of section 301 of this Act, the\nSecretary shall make available to\nproducers loans and purchases on\nthe 1975 crop of soybeans at such\nlevels as reflect the historical aver-\nage relationship of soybean support\nlevels to corn support levels during\nthe immediately preceding three\nyears.''\nTHECHAIRMAN :(12)The Clerk will\nreport the first committee amendment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nCommittee amendment: Page 2,\nline 15, after the word ``cooperator''\nstrike the period and insert ``, except\nthat for the 1975 crops of upland cot-\nton, feed grains and wheat, the Sec-\nretary shall establish, insofar as is\npracticable, the same terms and con-\nditions relative to storage costs and\ninterest rates on all nonrecourse\nloans extended on such crops.''.\nTHECHAIRMAN : The question is on\nthe committee amendment.\nThe committee amendment was\nagreed to.\nDuring the proceedings of Mar.\n20, 1975,(13)the following amend-\nment was offered:\nMR. [SILVIO O.] C ONTE [of Massachu-\nsetts]: Mr. Chairman, I offer an\namendment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Conte:\nPage 2, after line 25, add this new\nsection:``(c) Notwithstanding the provi-\nsions of section 301 of this Act or\ncommon sense, the Secretary shall\nmake available to producers loans\nand purchases on the 1975 crop of\nfruit nuts at such levels as reflect\nthe historical average relationship of\nfruit nut support levels to\ndingleberry support levels during the\nimmediately preceding one hundred\nand ninety-nine years''. ...\nMR. [T HOMAS S.] F OLEY [of Wash-\nington]: Mr. Chairman, the chairman\nof the committee finds it necessary to\ninsist on his point of order.\nI know the gentleman who has of-\nfered the amendment is a strong sup-\nporter of fruit nuts and is in great seri-\nousness in an effort to improve the bill,\nbut the reference in the amendment is\nto a standard which cannot be admin-\nistered because the country was not or-\nganized, the Congress was not orga-\nnized at the time he alleges in the\namendment the Dingleberry support\nprice was created. But principally be-\ncause under rule XVI, clause 7, the\nfundamental purpose of this amend-\nment does not relate to the funda-\nmental purpose of the bill, which is to\neffect changes in the target prices of\nloan rates on wheat, feed grain, and\ncotton.\nThe nuttiness of an amendment has\nnever been found in the precedents of\nthe House as an argument against ger-\nmaneness. ...\nMR. C ONTE : ... I feel that this\namendment is germane in the context\nof this bill. The whole bill is nutty, and\nI am merely institutionalizing what\nthe American people have known all\nalong, that farm subsidies do not grow\non trees.\nTHECHAIRMAN : The Chair is pre-\npared to rule.\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01444 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8825AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n14.H.R. 6196 (Committee on Agri-\nculture).15.109 C ONG. REC. 23322, 88th Cong.\n1st Sess., Dec. 4, 1963 (amendment\noffered by Mr. Harold D. Cooley\n[N.C.]).\n16.John J. Rooney (N.Y.).\n17.H.J. Res. 247 (Committee on Agri-\nculture).The Chair would observe that the\npurpose of this bill as set forth in the\nreport is to establish an emergency\nprice support program in the 1975 crop\ncommodity year for upland cotton,\nwheat, feed grains, soybeans, and milk.\nUnder the general proposition that it\nis in order to add another subject to a\nproposition containing subjects of the\nsame class, the Chair would point out\nthat the amendment of the gentleman\nfrom Massachusetts adds another agri-\ncultural commodity to the commodities\nproposed to be supported under the bill\nduring the same period of time.\nThe Chair rules, therefore, that the\ngentleman's amendment is germane\nand overrules the point of order.\nBill Striking Provisions and\nInserting LanguageÐAmend-\nment Adding Language With-\nout Striking Provisions\n§35.4 To a bill striking out a\nsection of existing law and\ninserting new language, an\namendment adding the new\nlanguage at the end of the\nsection of law being amend-\ned, rather than striking out\nthe section and inserting\nnew language, is germane.\nIn the 88th Congress, a bill(14)\nrelating to the cotton industry\nwas under consideration. A provi-\nsion in such bill sought to amend\nthe Agricultural Act of 1949 by\nstriking out a section of that lawpertaining to corn price supports\nand inserting in lieu thereof lan-\nguage creating a new cotton pro-\ngram. An amendment was of-\nfered(15)which sought to add the\nprovisions as to the new cotton\nprogram at the end of the section\nof existing law, thereby leaving\nthe existing section of law per-\ntaining to the corn program in-\ntact. Mr. John H. Kyl, of Iowa,\nmade the point of order that the\namendment was not germane; the\nChairman,(16)however, having al-\nready stated that, ``The purpose of\nthis amendment is to correct the\ntechnical references,'' ruled with-\nout further elaboration that the\namendment was germane.\nAmendment Affecting Different\nSection of Existing Law\n§35.5 To a joint resolution to\namend a specific section of\nthe Agricultural Adjustment\nAct of 1938 relating to the\nnational allotment for cotton,\nan amendment affecting an-\nother section of that act re-\nlating to allotment of acreage\nwas held to be not germane.\nIn the 76th Congress, a bill(17)\nwas under consideration which re-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01445 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8826DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n18.William B. Bankhead (Ala.).19.See the proceedings at 84 C ONG.\nREC. 5911, 5912, 76th Cong. 1st\nSess., May 22, 1939.\n20.S. 3998 (Committee on Banking and\nCurrency).\n1.86 C ONG. REC. 9805, 76th Cong. 3d\nSess., Aug. 1, 1940.lated to minimum national allot-\nments for cotton and which pro-\nvided:\nResolved, etc., That section 343(b) of\nthe Agricultural Adjustment Act of\n1938, as amended (relating to the na-\ntional allotment for cotton), is amend-\ned by adding at the end thereof the fol-\nlowing new sentence: ``The national al-\nlotment for any year (after 1939) shall\nbe not less than 11,500,000 bales.''\nAn amendment was offered, as\nfollows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. [Butler\nB.] Hare [of South Carolina]: At the\nend of line 8 add the following: `` Pro-\nvided, That allotment of acreage to the\nvarious States be based upon the ratio\nof the number of cotton growers and\ntheir dependents in each State bears to\nthe total number of such persons in\nthe United States.''\nA point of order was raised\nagainst the amendment, as fol-\nlows:\nMR. [M ARVIN ] JONES [of Texas]: Mr.\nSpeaker, I desire to make a point of\norder against the amendment, that it\nis not germane. This resolution deals\nwith section 343 of the Agricultural\nAdjustment Act, and this amendment\nhas to do with section 344 of the State\nallotments.\nThe Speaker,(18)in sustaining\nthe point of order, stated:\n... The Chair has considered the\namendment offered by the gentleman\nfrom South Carolina and finds upon acareful reading of the amendment that\nit does not relate to the section of the\nact that the resolution under consider-\nation seeks to amend and, therefore,\ncannot possibly be in order.(19)\nBill Affecting Amounts Avail-\nable for Assistance to Pro-\nducers of Certain Commod-\nitiesÐAmendment Modifying\nPortion of Law Addressing\nRequirements for Eligibility\nfor Funds\n§35.6 To a bill to amend a sec-\ntion of existing law with re-\nspect to amounts available\nfor assistance to producers\nof certain commodities, an\namendment to modify an-\nother section of that law\nwith respect to substantive\nrequirements for eligibility\nfor funds under the law was\nheld to be not germane.\nIn the 76th Congress, a bill(20)\nwas under consideration to in-\ncrease the credit resources of the\nCommodity Credit Corporation.\nThe following amendment was of-\nfered:(1)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [Orville]\nZimmerman [of Missouri]: At the end\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01446 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8827AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n2.Graham A. Barden (N.C.).3.H.R. 8609 (Committee on Agri-\nculture).\n4.105 C ONG. REC. 16567, 16568, 86th\nCong. 1st Sess., Aug. 20, 1959.\n5.Id. at p. 16568.of line 7, strike out the period and in-\nsert a semicolon and add the following:\nProvided, That to obtain a loan on cot-\nton, producer must furnish a certificate\nof grade and staple signed by a li-\ncensed classer whose license is issued\nby the United States Department of\nAgriculture.\nMr. Henry B. Steagall, of Ala-\nbama, made the point of order\nthat the amendment was not ger-\nmane to the bill. The Chairman,(2)\nsustaining the point of order, stat-\ned:\nThe bill now under consideration\nseeks to amend section 4, which deals\nwith the amount only. The amendment\noffered by the gentleman from Mis-\nsouri seeks to add a proposition which\nmight be germane to the original act\nbut which seems to the Chair not to be\nrelated to the section of the act here\nsought to be amended by the pending\nbill.\nSurplus Agricultural Products\nfor NeedyÐAmendment Pro-\nviding for Food Stamp Plan\n§35.7 To a bill to amend the\nact authorizing the Com-\nmodity Credit Corporation to\nmake surplus agricultural\nproducts available for needy\npersons in the United States,\nan amendment providing a\nnew and comprehensive food\nstamp plan for the distribu-\ntion of surplus products was\nheld to be germane.In the 86th Congress, during\nconsideration of a bill(3)to amend\nthe Agricultural Trade Develop-\nment and Assistance Act of 1954,\nan amendment was offered pro-\nviding in part:(4)\nAmendment offered by Mrs. Sul-\nlivan: . .. insert the following new\nsection 14 . ..:\nSec. 14. Title III of the Agricul-\ntural Trade Development and Assist-\nance Act of 1954, as amended, is fur-\nther amended by adding at the end\nthereof the following new section:\n``Sec. 306. (a) In order to promote\nthe general welfare, raise the levels\nof health and of nourishment for per-\nsons whose incomes prevent them\nfrom enjoying adequate diets, and\ndispose in a beneficial manner of\nfood commodities acquired by the\nCommodity Credit Corporation or\nthe Department of Agriculture . ..\nthe Secretary of Agriculture is here-\nby authorized to . .. put into oper-\nation . .. a program to distribute to\nneedy persons in the United States\nthrough a food stamp system such\nsurplus food commodities. ...''\nA point of order was raised\nagainst the amendment, as fol-\nlows:(5)\nMR. [C HARLES B.] H OEVEN [of Iowa]:\nMr. Chairman, I make the point of\norder that the amendment is not ger-\nmane to the extension of Public Law\n480, as incorporated in the bill H.R.\n8609.\nThe amendment proposes to estab-\nlish a new distribution system within\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01447 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8828DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n6.Richard W. Bolling (Mo.).7.H.R. 1318 (Committee on Agri-\nculture).\n8.113 C ONG. REC. 15159, 90th Cong.\n1st Sess., June 8, 1967.the United States. H.R. 8609 contains\nno such provision to which this pro-\nposed amendment is germane.\nIn addition, the proposed amend-\nment would suspend the operation of\nsection 416 of the Agricultural Act of\n1949, as amended, which is not before\nus.\nThe bill, H.R. 8609, contains only\none reference to section 416, but this\nprovision deals only with the labeling\nof surplus foods, not with the system of\ndistributing these commodities. ...\nIn defense of the amendment,\nthe proponent, Mrs. Leonor\nKretzer Sullivan, of Missouri,\nstated as follows:\n... H.R. 8609 is a bill to amend the\nAgricultural Trade Development and\nAssistance Act of 1954. ... The Agri-\ncultural Trade Development and As-\nsistance Act of 1954 . .. contains pro-\nvisions . .. authorizing domestic dona-\ntions of surplus food to our own needy.\nThis is contained in titles II and III of\nthe law.\nThe bill before us amends title II\nand III in several respects. The bill be-\nfore us furthermore contains language\nclearly applicable to the domestic dis-\ntribution of surplus foods. ...\nI make one further point in con-\ntesting the point of order. Cannon's\nPrecedents, volume VIII, section 2941,\nstates:\nAn act continuing and reenacting\nan existing law is subject to amend-\nment modifying the provisions of the\nlaw carried in the act. ...\nThe Chairman(6)agreed with\nthe contentions of Mrs. Sullivanand overruled the point of order,\nalso citing the following statement\nof the Chair in a prior similar rul-\ning:\nThe act which the bill proposes to\namend and extend contains a provision\nrelating to the subject matter and, as\npointed out, is sufficiently broad and\ndoes cover the material offered in this\namendment. ...\nFormula for State Participa-\ntion in Food Stamp Pro-\ngramÐAmendment Affecting\nQualifications of Recipients\n§35.8 To a bill authorizing\nfunds for the food stamp pro-\ngram for the next fiscal year\nand changing the formula for\nstate participation in the\nprogram, an amendment re-\nlating to the qualifications\nfor recipients of aid under\nthe program was held to be\ngermane.\nIn the 90th Congress, during\nconsideration of a bill(7)amending\ntwo sections of the Food Stamp\nAct of 1964, the following amend-\nment was offered, affecting a third\nsection:(8)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [William\nF.] Ryan [of New York]: Add the fol-\nlowing new section at the end of the\nbill:\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01448 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8829AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n9.Id. at p. 15162.\n10.Phillip M. Landrum (Ga.).11.H.R. 3283 (Committee on Agri-\nculture).\n12.See 97 C ONG. REC. 7168, 82d Cong.\n1st Sess., June 26, 1951.Sec. 3. Section 5 of the Food\nStamp Act of 1964 is amended by\nadding at the end thereof the fol-\nlowing new subsection:\n``(c) The Secretary shall issue regu-\nlations providing thatÐ\n``(1) families with very low money\nincomes may not be excluded from\nthe program by minimum stamp\npurchase requirements which exceed\ntheir budgetary resources. ...\n``(3) families with very low money\nincomes may not be required to com-\nmit themselves to purchase stamps\nevery month as a condition of par-\nticipation in the program.''\nA point of order was raised\nagainst the amendment, as fol-\nlows:(9)\nMR. [W ILLIAM R.] P OAGE [of Texas]:\nMr. Chairman, I make the point of order\nagainst the amendment that it is not ger-\nmane to the purposes or objectives of this\nbill, that it does not amend any of the\nsections covered by this bill or the sub-\nject matter touched on by this bill.\nThis bill relates only to sections 15\nand 16. The amendment offered by the\ngentleman from New York relates to\nsection 5 of the Food Stamp Act.\nThe Chairman,(10)in ruling on\nthe point of order, stated:\nThe bill, which has been amended,\namends two sections of existing law.\nThe proposed amendment to add an-\nother section to the pending bill would\namend a third section of existing law.\nThe Chair rules, therefore, that the\namendment is germane.Provisions Relating to Impor-\ntation of Farm WorkersÐPen-\nalties for Noncompliance\nWith Provisions of Bill\n§35.9 To a bill to amend the\nAgricultural Act of 1949 to\nauthorize the Secretary of\nLabor to recruit and make\ncertain provisions for agri-\ncultural workers from Mex-\nico, an amendment pro-\nviding, in one part, penalties\nfor employing any Mexican\nalien not duly admitted\n``under the terms of this act\nor any other law'' was held to\nbe not germane.\nIn the 82d Congress, a bill(11)\nwas under consideration which\nprovided in part as follows:(12)\nBe it enacted, etc., That the Agricul-\ntural Act of 1949 is amended by adding\nat the end thereof a new title to read\nas follows:\nTITLE VÐA GRICULTURAL WORKERS\nSec. 501. For the purpose of assist-\ning in such production of agricultural\ncommodities and products as the\nSecretary of Agriculture deems nec-\nessary, by supplying agricultural\nworkers from the Republic of Mexico\n(pursuant to arrangements between\nthe United States and the Republic\nof Mexico), the Secretary of Labor is\nauthorizedÐ\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01449 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8830DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n13.Id. at p. 7169.\n14.Id. at pp. 7169, 7170.15.Id. at p. 7170.\n16.Albert A. Gore (Tenn.).(1) to recruit such workers ...\n(2) to establish ...reception cen-\nters at or near the places of actual\nentry of such workers into the conti-\nnental United States. ...\n(3) to provide transportation for\nsuch workers. ...\nThe following amendment was\noffered:(13)\nAmendment offered by Mr. Polk in\nthe nature of a substitute for H.R.\n3283: That the Agriculture Act of 1949\nis amended by adding at the end there-\nof a new title to read as follows:\nTITLE VÐA GRICULTURAL WORKERS\nSec. 509. Any person who shall\nemploy any Mexican alien . .. not\nlawfully entitled to enter . .. the\nUnited States under the terms of\nthis act or any other law relating to\nthe immigration or expulsion of\naliens when such person . .. has\nreasonable grounds to believe . ..\nthat such alien is not lawfully within\nthe United States . .. shall be\nguilty of a felony. ...\nA point of order was raised\nagainst the amendment, as fol-\nlows:(14)\nMR. [H ARRIS ] E LLSWORTH [of Or-\negon]: . .. Section 509 of the proposed\nsubstitute deals only with the matter\nof finding information as to the illegal\nentry of alien Mexicans into the United\nStates, and imposes a penalty for fail-\nure to supply information concerning\nsuch illegal entry. That is the sole pur-\npose and the sole effect of this section\n509. It does not refer to the employ-\nment of farm labor, and it does not go\nto the purpose of the bill.Mr. Harold D. Cooley, of North\nCarolina, in support of the point\nof order, stated:(15)\nMr. Chairman, I would like to call\nattention to the fact that if section 509\nhad been introduced as a separate bill,\nit would not even have been referred to\nthe Committee on Agriculture. It\nwould have gone to the Immigration\nCommittee.\nIn defense of the amendment,\nthe proponent stated as follows:\nMR. [J AMES G.] P OLK [of Ohio]: Mr.\nChairman, I call attention to the fact\nthat this bill amends the Social Secu-\nrity Act, and I am speaking now on the\nbill before the House, H.R. 3283. It\nalso amends the Immigration Act of\n1917, and I refer to lines 7, 8, 9, and\n10, on page 5. It amends the Internal\nRevenue Code, and I refer to lines 2, 3\nand 4, at the top of page 5. In other\nwords, in several instances the bill\nwhich is before the House amends\nother Federal statutes.\nThe Chairman,(16)in ruling on\nthe point of order, stated:\nAs the Chair understands the rule of\ngermaneness, its purpose is to provide\nfor and protect the orderly procedure\nin the Committee of the Whole and in\nthe House. It is to protect the legisla-\ntive processes, to protect the member-\nship from hasty, ill-considered, and ex-\ntraneous subject matter being offered\nto the proposition under consideration.\nAn amendment, to be germane to a bill\nunder consideration, must be akin to\nand relative to the subject matter of\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01450 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8831AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n17.See § 35.10, infra, for discussion of a\nsimilar amendment held to be ger-\nmane because more narrowly word-\ned.\n18.Under consideration was H.R. 3283\n(Committee on Agriculture) and an\namendment thereto offered by Mr.\nJames G. Polk (Ohio) at 97 C ONG.\nREC. 7171, 82d Cong. 1st Sess., June\n26, 1951.For related proceedings and a de-\nscription of the bill, see § 35.9, supra.\n19.97 C ONG. REC. 7174, 82d Cong. 1st\nSess., June 26, 1951.\n20.Id. at p. 7175.\n1.Albert A. Gore (Tenn.).the bill. The Chair does not feel that\nthe provision of a penalty or the provi-\nsion for civil relief from a law seeking\nto be enacted would be a matter\nunakin or unrelated to the bill. How-\never, there is specific matter in the\namendment, to wit, ``or any other law\nrelating to the immigration [or] expul-\nsion of aliens'' which is to be found in\nsection 509 to which specific objection\nwas made. The Chair has examined\nthe bill before the Committee and is\nunable to find reference to any other\nlaw relating to the immigration or ex-\npulsion of aliens.\nTherefore, because of the references\njust cited, the Chair sustains the point\nof order.(17)\n§35.10 To a proposition relat-\ning to the recruitment of\nfarm laborers from Mexico,\nan amendment imposing pen-\nalties on any person employ-\ning Mexican labor not law-\nfully entitled to enter ``under\nthe terms of this act'' was\nheld to be germane.\nIn the 82d Congress, during\nconsideration of a proposition re-\nlating to the recruitment of farm\nlaborers from Mexico,(18)the fol-lowing amendment was of-\nfered:(19)\nAmendment offered by Mr. Celler to\nthe amendment offered by Mr. Polk:\nAdd a new section as follows:\nSec. Ð. Any person who shall em-\nploy as a farm laborer any Mexican\nalien . .. not lawfully entitled to\nenter . .. the United States under\nthe terms of this act, when such per-\nson . .. has reasonable grounds to\nbelieve . .. that such alien farm la-\nborer is not lawfully within the\nUnited States . .. shall be guilty of\na misdemeanor, and upon conviction\nthereof shall be punished by a fine\nnot exceeding $1,000, or by imprison-\nment. ...\nMr. Harold D. Cooley, of North\nCarolina, made the point of order\nthat the amendment was not ger-\nmane to the amendment under\nconsideration. Mr. Emanuel\nCeller, of New York, in support of\nhis amendment, stated:(20)\n... This is a bill concerning the op-\nerations of alien labor, what they shall\ndo and what they shall not do, under\nthe terms and conditions that they\nmay or may not come over the border,\nand my amendment certainly is con-\nsistent with the purposes and aims of\nthe bill in general. A penalty for viola-\ntion of the terms laid down is germane.\nThe Chairman,(1)in ruling on\nthe point of order, stated:\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01451 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8832DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n2.See § 35.9, supra, for discussion of a\nsimilar but more broadly worded\namendment which was held not to be\ngermane.\n3.H.R. 3283 (Committee on Agri-\nculture). See § 35.9, supra, for fur-\nther discussion of the bill.4.97 C ONG. REC. 7274, 82d Cong. 1st\nSess., June 27, 1951.\n5.Id. at p. 7275.\n6.Albert A. Gore (Tenn.).The Committee has before it a bill to\nwhich the gentleman from Ohio has of-\nfered an amendment, to which, in turn,\nthe gentleman from New York has of-\nfered an amendment providing specific\npenalties for violation of the provisions\nof the bill when written into law. The\nrule of germaneness has been inter-\npreted rather narrowly, but the Chair\ndoes not feel that it can declare or hold\nthat the provision of a penalty for the\nviolation of the provisions of the bill is\nnew subject matter or unrelated sub-\nject matter.\nTherefore, the point of order is over-\nruled.(2)\nÐAmendment Relating to De-\ntention of Aliens and Affect-\ning Prior Appropriations\n§35.11 To a bill amending the\nAgricultural Act of 1949 to\npermit importation of Mexi-\ncan agricultural workers, an\namendment relating to the\ndetention of Mexican aliens\ngenerally in the United\nStates and providing that\nprior appropriations be\navailable to carry out the\npurposes of the provision\nwas held to be not germane.\nIn the 82d Congress, during\nconsideration of a bill(3)relatingto importation of Mexican agricul-\ntural workers, the following\namendment was offered:(4)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [Eman-\nuel] Celler [of New York]: Add a new\nsection:\nSec. 512. Notwithstanding any\nother provision of law to the contrary\nand without regard to section 3709\nof the revised statutes, the Attorney\nGeneral is authorized to purchase,\nconstruct . .. and maintain . ..\nsuch detention facilities as may be\nnecessary for the apprehension and\nremoval to Mexico of Mexican aliens\nillegally in the United States. Appro-\npriations made to the Immigration\nand Naturalization Service shall be\navailable for expenditures to carry\nout the purposes of this act.\nA point of order was raised\nagainst the amendment, as fol-\nlows:(5)\nMR. [H AROLD D.] C OOLEY [of North\nCarolina]: [The amendment] broadens\nthe scope of the legislation under con-\nsideration. It is not germane, and it ac-\ntually constitutes an appropriation.\nThe Chairman,(6)in ruling on\nthe point of order, stated:\n... As the Chair understands the\nbill before the committee, H.R. 3283, it\napplies to certain Mexican aliens as a\nclass and as described in the bill. The\namendment offered by the gentleman\nfrom New York broadens the group to\ninclude Mexican aliens illegally in the\nUnited States, beyond the class de-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01452 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8833AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n7.H.R. 3283 (Committee on Agri-\nculture). See § 35.9, supra, for fur-\nther discussion of the bill.\n8.See 97 C ONG. REC. 7275, 82d Cong.\n1st Sess., June 27, 1951.\n9.Id. at p. 7276. 10.Wilbur D. Mills (Ark.).scribed in the bill. The amendment\nalso proposes to appropriate funds for\na certain purpose described in the\namendment.\nFor these two reasons, the Chair is\nconstrained to sustain the point of\norder.\nÐAmendment Affecting Labor\nStandards Under Different\nAct\n§35.12 To a bill amending the\nAgricultural Act of 1949 to\npermit importation of Mexi-\ncan agricultural workers, an\namendment providing that\nnotwithstanding the provi-\nsions of the Fair Labor\nStandards Act, ``the Sec-\nretary of Labor is empow-\nered to authorize . .. the\nemployment in agriculture of\nemployees under the age of\n16 years,'' was held to be not\ngermane.\nIn the 82d Congress, during\nconsideration of a bill(7)relating\nto importation of Mexican agricul-\ntural workers, an amendment was\noffered(8)as described above. A\npoint of order was raised against\nthe amendment, as follows:(9)\nMR. [H AROLD D.] C OOLEY [of North\nCarolina]: . .. The amendment is ob-viously not in order, since the author\nof the amendment clearly indicates it\nis an effort to amend the Fair Labor\nStandards Act, which is not before the\nHouse at this time at all.\nMr. Eugene J. McCarthy, of\nMinnesota, in support of the\namendment, stated:\nMr. Chairman, I would suggest that\nthere is an amendment to the Fair\nLabor Standards Act already in the\nbill, and it would seem to me another\namendment to the same effect would\nnot constitute a serious obstacle.\nThe Chairman,(10)in ruling on\nthe point of order, stated:\nThe bill H.R. 3283 refers to a certain\nclass of Mexican nationals, as de-\nscribed in the bill. The amendment of-\nfered by the gentleman from Texas\ndoes not relate to this group described\nin the bill, but to an entirely different\ngroup of individualsÐAmerican citi-\nzens and residents of the United\nStates. The amendment therefore is\nbeyond the purview of the bill H.R.\n3283, and the Chair sustains the point\nof order.\nCommon Carrier Rates for\nManufactured ProductsÐ\nAmendment Relating to Rates\nfor Farm Commodities\n§35.13 To a bill to amend the\nInterstate Commerce Act\nwith respect to those provi-\nsions making it unlawful for\na common carrier to give un-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01453 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8834DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n11.S. 2009 (Committee on Interstate\nand Foreign Commerce).\n12.See 84 C ONG. REC. 9868, 76th Cong.\n1st Sess., July 24, 1939.\n13.Id. at pp. 9868, 9869.14.Id. at p. 9869.\n15.R. Ewing Thomason (Tex.).reasonable preferences and\nauthorizing the Interstate\nCommerce Commission to in-\nvestigate rates for manufac-\ntured products, an amend-\nment relating to rates for\nfarm commodities and au-\nthorizing the Commission to\ninvestigate such rates was\nheld to be germane.\nIn the 76th Congress, a bill(11)\nwas under consideration amend-\ning the Interstate Commerce Act.\nThe bill stated in part:(12)\nSec. 6. (a) Paragraph (1) of section\n3 of the Interstate Commerce Act, as\namended, is amended to read as fol-\nlows:\n(1) It shall be unlawful for any\ncommon carrier . .. to . .. give\n... any undue or unreasonable\npreference or advantage to any par-\nticular person, company, firm, cor-\nporation . .. district, territory, or\nany particular description of traffic,\nin any respect whatsoever. ...\n(b) The Interstate Commerce Com-\nmission is authorized and directed to\ninstitute an investigation into (certain)\nrates on manufactured products. ...\nThe following amendment was\noffered:(13)\nAmendment offered by Mr. Jones of\nTexas: On page 202, line 12, after the\nword ``ever'', strike out the quotation\nmarks; and, after line 12, add the fol-\nlowing:(1a) It is hereby declared to be the\npolicy of Congress that shippers of\nwheat, cotton, and other farm com-\nmodities for export should have sub-\nstantially the same advantage of re-\nduced rates as compared to shippers\nof such commodities not for export\nthat are in effect in the case of ship-\nment of industrial products for ex-\nport as compared with shipments of\nindustrial products not for export,\nand the Interstate Commerce Com-\nmission is hereby directed to insti-\ntute such investigations, to conduct\nsuch hearings, and to issue orders\nmaking such revision of rates as may\nbe necessary for the purpose of car-\nrying out such policy.\nMr. Alfred L. Bulwinkle, of\nNorth Carolina, raised the point\nof order that the amendment was\nnot germane to the section of the\nbill to which offered, and con-\ntended that the language to which\nthe amendment was directed was\nthat referring to investigation of\nrates on manufactured prod-\nucts.(14)Mr. Marvin Jones, of\nTexas, in responding to the point\nof order made by Mr. Bulwinkle,\npointed out that paragraph (1), to\nwhich the amendment was actu-\nally directed, related to ``all kinds\nof discrimination in freight rates.''\nThe Chairman(15)overruled the\npoint of order.\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01454 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8835AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n16.H.R. 1005 (Committee on Ways and\nMeans).\n17.97 C ONG. REC. 11281, 82d Cong. 1st\nSess., Sept. 13, 1951. 18.Brooks Hays (Ark.).Free Importation of Com-\nmodityÐAmendment To In-\ncrease Domestic Supply of\nCommodity by Action of Na-\ntional Production Authority\n§35.14 To a bill proposing to\namend the Tariff Act of 1930\nto provide for the free impor-\ntation of twine used for\nbaling hay, straw and the\nlike, an amendment pro-\nposing an increase in the do-\nmestic supply of baling twine\nthrough allocation by the Na-\ntional Production Authority\nwas held to be not germane.\nIn the 82d Congress, during\nconsideration of a bill(16)pro-\nviding as described above, the fol-\nlowing amendment was of-\nfered:(17)\nAmendment offered by Mr. Edwin\nArthur Hall: Page 1, line 7, insert a\nnew section as follows:\nThe National Production Authority\nshall take all steps possible to allo-\ncate from domestic supplies enough\nbaling twine to meet the needs of\nAmerican farmers not only for the\n1951 purpose but for all subsequent\nemergencies.\nMr. Jere Cooper, of Tennessee,\nmade the point of order that the\namendment was not germane to\nthe bill. In defense of the amend-ment, the proponent stated as fol-\nlows:\nMR. E DWIN ARTHUR HALL [of New\nYork]: Mr. Chairman, we are here to\ntry to get baling twine for the farmers\nof the country. ... [T]his amendment\nshould be submitted to a vote since it\nis an honest effort to accomplish the\nobjective which we are all here to try\nto accomplish.\nThe Chairman,(18)in ruling on\nthe point of order, stated:\nThe gentleman from New York offers\nan amendment that has for its purpose\napparently an increase in the domestic\nsupply of baling twine. The pending\nlegislation is an amendment to the\nTariff Act of 1930. It appears from an\nexamination of the gentleman's amend-\nment that it goes far beyond the scope\nof the bill, in that it applies to dif-\nferent legislation; therefore the Chair\nsustains the point of order.\nNotice to Congress of Curtail-\nment of Agricultural Ex-\nportsÐPayments to Farmers\nAffected\n§35.15 To a section requiring\nnotice to Congress of curtail-\nment of export of agricul-\ntural commodities, contained\nin a title of a bill reported\nfrom the Committee on Inter-\nnational Relations extending\nand amending the Export Ad-\nministration Act, an amend-\nment requiring domestic\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01455 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8836DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n19.123 C ONG. R EC. 11437, 11440,\n11441, 95th Cong. 1st Sess.\n20.The Export Administration Amend-\nments of 1977.payments to farmers having\nin storage commodities for\nwhich exports have been sus-\npended was held not ger-\nmane as beyond the scope\nand subject matter of the\nsection or title.\nOn Apr. 20, 1977,(19)during con-\nsideration of H.R. 5840(20)in the\nCommittee of the Whole, the\nChair sustained a point of order\nagainst the amendment described\nabove. The proceedings were as\nfollows:\nSec. 105. Section 4(f) of the Export\nAdministration Act of 1969, as\namended by section 104 of this Act,\nis further amended by adding at the\nend thereof the following new para-\ngraph:\n``(3) If the authority conferred by\nthis section is exercised to prohibit\nor curtail the exportation of any ag-\nricultural commodity in order to ef-\nfectuate the policies set forth in\nclause (B) of paragraph (2) of section\n3 of this Act, the President shall im-\nmediately report such prohibition or\ncurtailment to the Congress, setting\nforth the reasons therefor in detail.\nIf the Congress, within 30 days after\nthe date of its receipt of such report,\nadopts a concurrent resolution dis-\napproving such prohibition or cur-\ntailment, then such prohibition or\ncurtailment shall cease to be effec-\ntive with the adoption of such resolu-\ntion. ...\nMR. [K EITH G.] S EBELIUS [of Kan-\nsas]: Mr. Chairman, I offer an amend-\nment.The Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr.\nSebelius: Page 8 after line 21, insert\nthe following:\n``(4)(A) Notwithstanding any provi-\nsion of law, whenever the President\nof the United States or any other\nmember of the executive branch of\nthe Federal Government suspends or\ncauses a suspension of export sales\nof corn, wheat, soybeans, grain sor-\nghum, or cotton, the Secretary of Ag-\nriculture shall make payments de-\nscribed in subsection (B) and (C) to\nany farmowner or operator who has\nin storage at the beginning of the\nsuspension any amount of the com-\nmodity for which export sales have\nbeen suspended; except that no such\npayments may be made with regard\nto any such commodity unless, at the\nclose of the calendar month pre-\nceding the calendar month in which\nthe suspension is initiated, the price\nreceived by producers of such com-\nmodity was less than the parity\nprice.\n``(B) The first payment described\nin subsection (A) shall become pay-\nable at the initiation of the suspen-\nsion of export sales of the commodity\nconcerned. Such payment shall be\nmade at a rate of 10 per centum of\nthe parity price per bushel or bale of\nthe commodity concerned which was\nproduced by the farm owner or oper-\nator and which is held in storage by\nhim at the time of the initiation of\nthe suspension. ...\nMR. [C LEMENT J.] Z ABLOCKI [of Wis-\nconsin]: Mr. Chairman, apparently the\namendment the gentleman from Kan-\nsas (Mr. Sebelius) has presented is a\nparity amendment pending in the part\nof the bill before the Agriculture Com-\nmittee.\nMR. SEBELIUS : That is right.\nMR. ZABLOCKI : It is not germane to\nsection 105, which deals solely with ex-\nisting authority of the President to\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01456 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8837AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n1.Frank E. Evans (Colo.).2.H.R. 8357 (Committee on Interstate\nand Foreign Commerce).\n3.See 100 C ONG. REC. 6408, 83d Cong.\n2d Sess., May 11, 1954.limit export controls for foreign policy\npurposes under the Export Administra-\ntion Act.\nSecond, the amendment gives the\nPresident new authority where export\ncontrols are imposed for new purposes\nunder a new act.\nAnd, third, this new authority deals\nsolely with domestic matters which are\nwithin the jurisdiction of another coun-\ntry.\nAs I said, it is a parity amendment.\nLastly, this is a farm subsidy issue,\nnot an issue of foreign affairs.\nThis bill does not deal with agricul-\ntural parity, it does not deal with sup-\nport controls.\nTherefore, Mr. Chairman, I submit\nthat the amendment is not in order.\n...\nTHE CHAIRMAN :(1)The Chair is\nready to rule.\nH.R. 5840 is a bill to amend the Ex-\nport Administration Act of 1969 in\norder to extend the authorities of that\nact, improve the administration of ex-\nport controls under that act, and to\nstrengthen the antiboycott provisions\nof that act.\nSection 105 of the bill as amended\namends the procedure by which the\nSecretary of Commerce can notify the\nCongress of the exercise of authority\ncurtailing exports of agricultural prod-\nucts. It thereafter gives the Congress a\ncertain period of time within which to\ndisapprove if it so chooses.\nThe amendment offered by the gen-\ntleman from Kansas (Mr. Sebelius)\ngoes beyond the purview of the title\nand the section to which offered, in\nthat it would require payments by theSecretary of Agriculture to any farm-\nowner or operator who has in storage\nat the beginning of the suspension any\namount of the commodity for which ex-\nport sales have been suspended.\nFor the reasons stated by the Chair\nand the reasons given by the gen-\ntleman from Wisconsin, the point of\norder is sustained.\nSize of Specified Container\nUnder Standard Container\nActÐAmendment Delegating\nAuthority to Secretary of Ag-\nriculture to Regulate Various\nContainer Sizes\n§35.16 To a bill amending the\nStandard Container Act only\nto provide for one additional\nsize of container, an amend-\nment inserting in the act a\nnew section delegating to the\nSecretary of Agriculture au-\nthority to regulate the size of\ncertain containers was held\nnot germane.\nIn the 83d Congress, a bill(2)\nwas under consideration to amend\nthe Standard Container Act of\n1928. The bill stated in part:(3)\n(bb) The standard three-eighths\nbushel hamper or round-stave basket\nshall contain eight hundred and six\nand four-tenths cubic inches.\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01457 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8838DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n4.Id. at pp. 6408, 6409.\n5.Id. at p. 6409.\n6.Timothy P. Sheehan (Ill.).7.H.R. 6042 (Committee on Banking\nand Currency).\n8.92 C ONG. REC. 3909, 79th Cong. 2d\nSess., Apr. 17, 1946.An amendment was offered(4)\nwhich stated in part:\nSec. 3. Whenever in his judgment\nsuch action is advisable . .. the Sec-\nretary of Agriculture may by\nregulationsÐ\n(1) provide for standard hampers\nand round stave baskets for fruits and\nvegetables. ...\nMr. Joseph P. O'Hara, of Min-\nnesota, made the point of order\nthat the amendment was not ger-\nmane, stating,(5)``[I]t involves an\nattempt to change the Constitu-\ntion of the United States in dele-\ngating authority to the Secretary\nof Agriculture. . ..'' Mr. Peter F.\nMack, Jr., of Illinois, the pro-\nponent of the amendment, stated:\n... I believe this amendment mere-\nly delegates authority for administra-\ntion to the Secretary of Agriculture.\nThe Secretary of Agriculture already\nhas, by reason of the act of 1928, au-\nthority to establish allowances for var-\nious containers. I believe that this\namendment merely gives him addi-\ntional authority to establish containers\nin addition to the ones already pro-\nvided for.\nThe Chairman(6)sustained the\npoint of order, citing the rule that:\nWhere a bill proposes to amend a\nlaw in one particular . . . amendments\nseeking to repeal the law or relating to\nthe terms of the law rather than to the\nbill are not germane.Bill To Extend Price Control\nActÐAmendment To Exempt\nLivestock Products\n§35.17 To a bill to extend the\nPrice Control Act, an amend-\nment providing that notwith-\nstanding any provisions of\nthe act no regulation, direc-\ntive, or allocation should be\nissued or maintained with\nrespect to livestock or any\nedible product processed\nfrom livestock was held ger-\nmane.\nIn the 79th Congress, during\nconsideration of the Emergency\nPrice Control Act,(7)the following\namendment was offered:(8)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [James\nW.] Wadsworth [Jr., of New York]: On\npage 4, after line 25, add a new section\nto read as follows:\nSec. 4. Section 2 of the Emergency\nPrice Control Act of 1942, as amend-\ned, is amended by inserting at the\nend of such section a new subsection\nas follows:\n``(p) Notwithstanding any provi-\nsions of this act no regulation, order,\ndirective, or allocation shall be\nissued, made, or maintained (includ-\ning directives for distribution or\nprice schedules) with respect to live-\nstock or any edible product processed\nin whole or substantial part from\nlivestock.''\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01458 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8839AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n9.Jere Cooper (Tenn.).\n10.92 C ONG. REC. 3904, 79th Cong. 2d\nSess., Apr. 17, 1946.\n11.H.R. 6042 (Committee on Banking\nand Currency). 12.Jere Cooper (Tenn.).A point of order was raised\nagainst the amendment, as fol-\nlows:\nMR. [F RANK E.] H OOK [of Michigan]:\nMr. Chairman, I make a point of order\nagainst the amendment on the ground\nthat it goes beyond the scope of the bill\nand is not germane to either the sec-\ntion or the bill.\nThe Chairman,(9)in ruling on\nthe point of order, stated:\n... The Chair invites attention to\nthe fact that the amendment is con-\nfined to the Emergency Price Control\nAct of 1942 which is sought here to be\namended, and the Chair is of the opin-\nion that the amendment is germane.\nSection of Price Control Act\nExtension Relating to Meat\nSubsidiesÐAmendment To\nEliminate Livestock and Meat\nSubsidies\n§35.18 To a section of the\nEmergency Price Control Act\nrelating to subsidies for meat\nand other commodities, an\namendment seeking to elimi-\nnate livestock and meat sub-\nsidies was held germane.\nThe following proceedings in the\n79th Congress,(10)during consider-\nation of the Emergency Price Con-\ntrol Act,(11)concerned the ger-maneness of an amendment of-\nfered by Mr. John W. Flannagan,\nJr., of Virginia:\nAmendment offered by Mr.\nFlannagan:\n1. Amend section 5, page 6, line\n20, by striking out ``meat,\n$715,000,000.''\n2. Amend section 5, page 8, line 2,\nby inserting a colon in lieu of the pe-\nriod at the end of the sentence and\nadding the following: `` Provided fur-\nther, That no funds . .. shall be\nused after June 30, 1946, to continue\nany existing program or to institute\nany new program for the payment of\nsubsidies on livestock or meat de-\nrived from livestock . .. And pro-\nvided further, That in order to pre-\nvent the reduction of livestock prices\nupon the elimination of such live-\nstock and meat subsidy payments,\nthe Administrator shall make cor-\nresponding increases in maximum\nprices of livestock, meat, and meat\nproducts. ...''\nMR. [F RANK E.] H OOK [of Michigan]:\nMr. Chairman, I make a point of order\nagainst the amendment on the ground,\nfirst, that it is not germane to the bill,\nand, second, that it goes far beyond the\nauthorization and scope of this bill.\nThe bill only provides for the extension\nof the Office of Price Administration\nand Stabilization and this takes in\nmany other acts and agencies. ...\nMR. FLANNAGAN : The only purpose\nthis amendment would accomplish\nwould be to eliminate entirely meat\nsubsidies.\nTHECHAIRMAN :(12)... The section\nrelates to the question of subsidies.\nThe amendment offered by the gen-\ntleman from Virginia (Mr. Flannagan)\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01459 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8840DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n13.H.R. 3935 (Committee on Education\nand Labor).\n14.107 C ONG. REC. 4797, 87th Cong. 1st\nSess., Mar. 24, 1961. See also § 42.7,\ninfra, for discussion of this ruling.likewise relates to the question of sub-\nsidies. The Chair believes the amend-\nment is germane and overrules the\npoint of order.\nAmendment Modifying Defini-\ntion of ``Agriculture'' in Fair\nLabor Standards Act\n§35.19 To a substitute modi-\nfying the definition of the\nterm ``agriculture'' in the\nFair Labor Standards Act of\n1938 to include the proc-\nessing of tobacco, and con-\ntaining diverse other amend-\nments to that Act, an amend-\nment adding to that defini-\ntion transportation of fruit\nand vegetables and transpor-\ntation of persons employed\nin harvesting such commod-\nities was held to be germane.\nIn the 87th Congress, a bill(13)\nwas under consideration to amend\nthe Fair Labor Standards Act of\n1938 and to establish a new min-\nimum wage. The following amend-\nment was offered to the bill:(14)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [William\nH.] Ayres [of Ohio]: Strike out all after\nthe enacting clause and insert the fol-\nlowing: ``That this Act may be cited as\nthe `Fair Labor Standards Amend-\nments of 1961.' ''DEFINITIONS\nSec. 2. (a) Paragraph (f) of section\n3 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of\n1938 is amended by inserting after\n``Agricultural Marketing Act, as\namended),'' the following: ``the proc-\nessing of shade-grown tobacco for\nuse as cigar wrapper tobacco by agri-\ncultural employees employed in the\ngrowing and harvesting of such to-\nbacco, which processing shall in-\nclude, but shall not be limited to,\ndrying, curing . .. and bailing, prior\nto the stemming process,''.\n(b) Paragraph (m) of section 3 of\nsuch Act, defining the term ``wage'',\nis amended by inserting before the\nperiod at the end thereof a colon and\nthe following: `` Provided, That the\ncost of board, lodging or other facili-\nties shall not be included as a part of\nthe wage paid to any employee to the\nextent it is excluded therefrom under\nthe terms of a bona fide individual\ncontract or collective bargaining\nagreement applicable to the par-\nticular employee''.\n(c) Section 3 of such Act is further\namended by adding at the end there-\nof the following new paragraphs:\n...\n``(q) `Enterprise' means the related\nactivities performed (either through\nunified operation or common control)\nby any person or persons for a com-\nmon retail business purpose . ..\n``(r) `Enterprise engaged in com-\nmerce or in the production of goods\nfor commerce' means any enterprise\nwhich has five or more retail estab-\nlishments and which operates such\nestablishment in two or more States.\n``(s) `Retail establishment' shall\nmean an establishment 75 per cen-\ntum of whose annual dollar volume\nof sales of goods is not for resale and\nis recognized as retail sales in the\nparticular industry. ...''\nSec. 3. Section 4 of such Act is\namended by adding at the end there-\nof the following new subsection:\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01460 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8841AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n15.Id. at p. 4806. 16.Francis E. Walter (Pa.).``(e) Whenever the Secretary has\nreason to believe that in any indus-\ntry under this Act the competition of\nforeign producers in United States\nmarkets or in markets abroad, or\nboth, has resulted, or is likely to re-\nsult, in increased unemployment in\nthe United States, he shall under-\ntake an investigation to gain full in-\nformation with respect to the matter\nand shall make a full and complete\nreport of his findings and determina-\ntions to the President and to the\nCongress.''. ..\nSec. 11. The Secretary of Labor\nshall study the complicated system\nof exemptions now available for the\nhandling and processing of agricul-\ntural products under such Act and\nparticularly sections 7(b)(3), 7(c), and\n13(a)(10), and shall submit to the\nsecond session of the Eighty-seventh\nCongress at the time of his report\nunder section 4(d) of such Act a spe-\ncial report containing the results of\nsuch study and information, data,\nand recommendations for further\nlegislation designed to simplify and\nremove the inequities in the applica-\ntion of such exemptions.\nSubsequently, the following\namendment was offered:(15)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [Albert\nS.] Herlong [Jr.], of Florida, to the\namendment offered by Mr. Ayres, of\nOhio:\nPage 2, line 5, strike out the pe-\nriod and add the following: ``and in\nthe case of fruits and vegetables in-\ncludes transportation and prepara-\ntion for transportation, whether or\nnot performed by the farmer, of the\ncommodity from the farm to a place\nof first processing or first marketing\nwithin the same State, (2) transpor-\ntation, whether or not performed by\nthe farmer, between the farm and\nany point within the same State ofpersons employed or to be employed\nin the harvesting of the commodity.''\nMr. Roman C. Pucinski, of Illi-\nnois, made a point of order\nagainst the Herlong amendment\non the ground that it was not ger-\nmane. In support of the point of\norder, Mr. James G. O'Hara, of\nMichigan, stated:\nThe amendment offered by the gen-\ntleman from Florida attempts to\namend not the act before us, but Public\nLaw 78, under which migrant labor is\nbrought into the country, and the other\nact of Congress under which the U.S.\nEmployment Service is established.\nAn exemption already exists under\nthe Fair Labor Standards Act, exempt-\ning agricultural labor from the applica-\ntion of the Fair Labor Standards Act,\nand this is an attempt to amend not\nthe Fair Labor Standards Act, but\nother acts passed by various Con-\ngresses.\nThe Chairman,(16)in ruling on\nthe point of order, stated:\nThis is unquestionably an amend-\nment to the Fair Labor Standards Act.\nIt specifically refers to the Fair Labor\nStandards Act.\nThe Chair overrules the point of\norder.\nBill Broadly Amending Na-\ntional Labor Relations ActÐ\nAmendment Providing for In-\njunctions Against Violation\nof No-strike Agreements\n§35.20 To a bill amending sev-\neral sections of the National\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01461 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8842DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n17.123 C ONG. REC. 32609, 95th Cong.\n1st Sess.\n18.The Labor Reform Act of 1977.\n19.William H. Natcher (Ky.).Labor Relations Act dealing\nwith procedures and rem-\nedies as to labor elections,\norganization and activities\nboth during and after the ini-\ntial stage of labor organiza-\ntion, an amendment adding a\nnew section to amend a sec-\ntion of the law, already\namended by the bill, to af-\nford a judicial remedy to en-\njoin violation of no-strike\nagreements between employ-\ners and labor organizations,\nwas held germane.\nOn Oct. 6, 1977,(17)during con-\nsideration of H.R. 8410(18)in the\nCommittee of the Whole, the\nChair overruled a point of order\nagainst the amendment described\nabove. The proceedings were as\nfollows:\nTHECHAIRMAN :(19)Are there amend-\nments to section 10 of the bill?\nIf not, the Clerk will read.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nSec. 11. Section 10(m) is amended by\ninserting ``under circumstances not\nsubject to section 10(l),'' after ``section\n8.''\nAMENDMENT OFFERED BY MR .\nERLENBORN\nMR. [J OHN N.] E RLENBORN [of Illi-\nnois]: Mr. Chairman, I offer an amend-\nment.The Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Erlen-\nborn: Page 28, after line 5, insert the\nfollowing new section 12, and renum-\nber the subsequent section accord-\ningly:\nSec. 12. Section 10 of the National\nLabor Relations Act, as amended, is\namended by adding at the end there-\nof the following new subsection:\n``(n) Where there exists an agree-\nment between an employer and a\nlabor organization, whether express\nor implied, not to strike, picket or\nlockout, a party to the agreement, or\nthe Board if it finds that the public\ninterest would be served thereby,\nshall have the power to petition any\ndistrict court of the United States\n(including the District Court of the\nUnited States for the District of Co-\nlumbia) within any district where ei-\nther or both of the parties reside or\ntransact business, for such tem-\nporary injunctive relief or restrain-\ning order as is necessary to prevent\nany person from engaging in, or in-\nducing or encouraging any employee\nof the employer to engage in, conduct\nin breach of such agreement, irre-\nspective of the nature of the dispute\nunderlying such strike, picket or\nlockout, and such court shall have\njurisdiction to grant to such party or\nthe Board such temporary injunctive\nrelief or restraining order as it\ndeems just and proper.''\nMR. [F RANK ] THOMPSON [Jr., of New\nJersey]: Mr. Chairman, I make a point\nof order against the amendment. ...\nMr. Chairman, this amendment\namends the Norris-LaGuardia Act of\n1932 prohibiting Federal courts from\nissuing injunctions in labor disputes.\nIt also amends title II, the National\nemergency dispute provision of the\nLabor Management Relations Act of\n1947. It eliminates the 80-day cooling-\noff period provided in title II. It re-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01462 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8843AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n20.H.R. 15198 (Committee on Education\nand Labor).\n1.114 C ONG. REC. 23403, 90th Cong.\n2d Sess., July 25, 1968.writes the definition of what con-\nstitutes an emergency to be any situa-\ntion in which ``the public interest\nwould be served.'' H.R. 8410 is limited\nto the subject of remedies and proce-\ndures relating to the right of employ-\nees to organize and bargain collec-\ntively. Amendments to Norris-\nLaGuardia and Taft-Hartley are not\ngermane. ...\nMR. E RLENBORN : ... My amend-\nment, as I think the Chair is aware,\namends section 10 of the National\nLabor Relations Act. Section 10 is\namended in the bill before us.\nThis amendment would add section\n10(n) to that act. It is remedial, it is\nprocedural, and it is consonant with\nthe bill before us as reported by the\ncommittee.\nMr. Chairman, I think it is clearly a\nremedial, procedural amendment to a\nsection of the act which has been\namended by the committee bill and is\nin order under all of the previous rul-\nings of the Chair.\nTHECHAIRMAN : The Chair is ready\nto rule.\nThe amendment offered by the gen-\ntleman from Illinois [Mr. Erlenborn]\nadds a new section to the bill. The bill\nas a whole does not deal exclusively\nwith the period of initial organizational\nactivity as it relates to remedies. Cer-\ntain remedies in the bill go to post-or-\nganizational conduct. The amendment\nadds a new remedy.\nIn the opinion of the Chair, the\namendment is germane to the bill as a\nwhole and the point of order is over-\nruled.Bill Amending One Section of\nLabor-Management Relations\nActÐAmendment Affecting\nEntire Act\n§35.21 To a bill amending a\nsection of the Labor-Manage-\nment Relations Act to permit\nemployer contributions for\njoint industry promotion of\nproducts within the con-\nstruction industry, an\namendment applicable in\nscope to all industries cov-\nered by the act and relating\nto funds established for polit-\nical education was held to be\nnot germane.\nIn the 90th Congress, during\nconsideration of a bill(20)amend-\ning the Labor-Management Rela-\ntions Act of 1947, the following\namendment was offered:(1)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [Marvin\nL.] Esch [of Michigan]: On page 3, line\n17, before the period, insert the fol-\nlowing:\nProvided further, That nothing in\nthe Labor-Management Relations\nAct, 1947, as amended, shall be con-\nstrued to make unlawful or to pro-\nhibit an employer from participating\nin the joint administration of funds\nestablished by a labor organization\nfor purposes of political education.\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01463 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8844DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n2.Neal Smith (Iowa).3.H.R. 8210 (Committee on Banking\nand Currency).\n4.98 C ONG. REC. 7654, 82d Cong. 2d\nSess., June 19, 1952.A point of order was raised\nagainst the amendment, as fol-\nlows:\nMR. [F RANK ] THOMPSON [Jr., of New\nJersey]: Mr. Chairman, I make a point\nof order against the amendment on the\nground it is not germane. It would es-\ntablish the joint administration of\nfunds for political purposes, a subject\nnot mentioned in the subject matter of\nthe legislation before us.\nThe Chairman,(2)in ruling on\nthe point of order, stated:\nThe bill under consideration amends\nonly section 302(c) of the act, whereas\nthe proposed amendment attempts to\namend the entire act and brings in\nnew matter that is not covered in sec-\ntion 302(c) or in the bill.\nThe Chair rules that the amendment\nis not germane, and sustains the point\nof order.\nNegotiation of Labor Dis-\nputesÐAmendment To Em-\npower President To Seize\nPlants Threatened With Work\nStoppages\n§35.22 To a bill extending and\namending a law that pro-\nvided for settlement of labor\ndisputes primarily through\nnegotiation between the par-\nties to such disputes, an\namendment to empower the\nPresident to take possession\nof plants threatened with\nwork stoppages that are con-sidered to endanger the na-\ntional defense was held not\ngermane.\nIn the 82d Congress, during\nconsideration of the Defense Pro-\nduction Act Amendments of\n1952,(3)the following amendment\nwas offered:(4)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [Richard\nW.] Bolling [of Missouri]: On page 3,\nline 15, insert the following section:\nSec. 103: Title II of the Defense\nProduction Act of 1950, as amended,\nis amended by adding at the end\nthereof the following new section:\n``Sec. 202. (a) Whenever the Presi-\ndent . .. acting upon the written\nrecommendation of the National Se-\ncurity Council, shall find that the\nnational defense is endangered by a\nstoppage of production or a threat-\nened stoppage of production in any\none or more plants, mines, or facili-\nties, as a result of the present man-\nagement-labor dispute in the steel\nindustry, the President is . .. au-\nthorized to take possession of and to\noperate such plants, mines, or facili-\nties. ...''\nA point of order was raised\nagainst the amendment, as fol-\nlows:\nMR. [JAMES G.] F ULTON [of Pennsyl-\nvania]: Mr. Chairman, I make the\npoint of order that the amendment is\nout of order on the ground that it is\nnot germane to this section or to this\nbill; that it is affirmative legislation\nnot within the purview of the jurisdic-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01464 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8845AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n5.Wilbur D. Mills (Ark.).\n6.98 C ONG. REC. 7655, 82d Cong. 2d\nSess., June 19, 1952.7.121 C ONG. REC. 24819, 24841, 94th\nCong. 1st Sess.tion covered by the language of this\nact.\nThe Chairman,(5)in ruling on\nthe point of order, stated:(6)\nThe Chair has had an opportunity to\nstudy the amendment offered by the\ngentleman from Missouri [Mr. Bolling]\nand it is the opinion of the Chair that\nthe amendment proposes to make basic\nchanges in our labor legislation. The\namendment proposes further to amend\ntitle II of the Defense Production Act of\n1950, which is the authority to requisi-\ntion property. The amendment goes be-\nyond . .. the mere requisition of prop-\nerty and . .. proposes to make\nchanges in our labor laws.\nIn view of the fact that it goes be-\nyond the scope of title II of the Defense\nProduction Act of 1950, the Chair is\nconstrained to sustain the point of\norder. ...\nBill To Permit Common Situs\nPicketingÐAmendment Relat-\ning to Another Section of Law\nProviding Remedies for Un-\nfair Practices\n§35.23 Where it is proposed to\namend existing law in one\nparticular, an amendment to\nfurther amend the law in an-\nother respect unrelated to\nthe bill is not germane; thus,\nto a narrowly drafted bill de-\nsigned to amend section 8 of\nthe National Labor RelationsAct, dealing with unfair\nlabor practices, to permit\ncommon situs picketing\nunder certain circumstances,\nan amendment further quali-\nfying the right to so picket\nand providing a civil remedy\nfor persons injured by illegal\npickets was ruled out as not\ngermane, being beyond the\nscope of the bill, since the\nlaw itself provided remedies\nfor unfair labor practices in\nanother section and the bill\nwas not sufficiently broad to\nadmit as germane amend-\nments relating to that sec-\ntion.\nDuring consideration of H.R.\n5900 in the Committee of the\nWhole on July 25, 1975,(7)the\nChair sustained a point of order\nin the circumstances described\nabove. The section of the bill\npending and the amendment of-\nfered thereto were as follows:\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nBe it enacted by the Senate and\nHouse of Representatives of the\nUnited States of America in Congress\nassembled, That section 8(b)(4) of the\nNational Labor Relations Act, as\namended, is amended by inserting\nbefore the semicolon at the end\nthereof ``; Provided further , That\nnothing contained in clause (B) of\nthis paragraph (4) shall be construed\nto prohibit any strike or refusal to\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01465 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8846DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\nperform services or any inducement\nof any individual employed by any\nperson to strike or refuse to perform\nservices at the site of the construc-\ntion, alteration, painting, or repair of\na building, structure, or other work\nand directed at any of several em-\nployers who are in the construction\nindustry and are jointly engaged as\njoint venturers or in the relationship\nof contractors and subcontractors in\nsuch construction, alteration, paint-\ning, or repair at such site, and there\nis a labor dispute, not unlawful\nunder this Act or in violation of an\nexisting collective-bargaining con-\ntract, relating to the wages, hours, or\nother working conditions of employ-\nees employed at such site by any of\nsuch employers and the issues in the\ndispute do not involve a labor orga-\nnization which is representing the\nemployees of an employer at the site\nwho is not engaged primarily in the\nconstruction industry; Provided fur-\nther, Except as provided in the above\nproviso nothing herein shall be con-\nstrued to permit any act or conduct\nwhich was or may have been an un-\nfair labor practice under this sub-\nsection; Provided further , That noth-\ning in the above provisos shall be\nconstrued to prohibit any act which\nwas not an unfair labor practice\nunder the provisions of this sub-\nsection existing prior to the enact-\nment of such provisos: Provided fur-\nther, that nothing in the above pro-\nvisos shall be construed to authorize\npicketing, threatening to picket, or\ncausing to be picketed, any employer\nwhere an object thereof is the re-\nmoval or exclusion from the site of\nany employee on the ground of sex,\nrace, creed, color, or national ori-\ngin. ...\nMR. [W. H ENSEN ] M OORE [of Lou-\nisiana]: Mr. Chairman, I offer an\namendment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Moore:\nPage 5, line 3, immediately after``proviso;'' add the following: `` Pro-\nvided further , That nothing in the\nabove provisos shall be construed to\npermit picketing of an employer who\nis not a party to a dispute over an\neconomic matter in cases when pick-\neting is conducted in a manner that\nwould cause that employer's employ-\nees to cease work and the employees\nof that employer have a lower wage\nscale than that of the aggrieved\nlabor organization; and any em-\nployee who ceases work because of a\nviolation of this proviso may bring a\ncivil action against the labor organi-\nzation in any United States district\ncourt of competent jurisdiction to re-\ncover the wages lost as a result of\nsuch violation, and the court shall\naward costs and reasonable attor-\nneys' fees to the prevailing plain-\ntiff.''. ..\nMR. [J AMES G.] O'H ARA [of Michi-\ngan]: . .. I make the point of order\nthat the amendment offered by the\ngentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Moore)\nis not germane to the purposes of the\nbill before us.\nThe bill before us is a very narrowly\ndrawn piece of legislation that affects\nonly 8(b)(4)(B) of the act. It affects only\nthe question of construction workers\npicketing a construction site, and it\ngoes very narrowly to that point.\nOn the other hand, the amendment\noffered by the gentleman from Lou-\nisiana (Mr. Moore) goes ahead and sets\nup a cause of action against labor orga-\nnizations in Federal district courts, re-\ncovering lost wages and so forth.\nIt might be a germane provision to\nthe National Labor Relations Act, but\nit is not a germane amendment to this\nparticular section of the act or to the\nbill that is now before us. ...\nMR. MOORE : Mr. Chairman, I oppose\nthe point of order on the ground that\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01466 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8847AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n8.William H. Natcher (Ky.).this bill takes away this power under\nthe appropriate section of this act. All\nthis does is exempt this proviso of this\nparticular action as it applies to these\nparticular employees, and this exemp-\ntion to such a provision in this bill is\ngermane. The fact that it gives the\nright of civil action means nothing\nmore than to strengthen the abilities of\nthis particular proviso. Therefore, Mr.\nChairman, I submit that it is indeed\nvery much germane.\nTHE CHAIRMAN :(8)The Chair is\nready to rule.\nThe gentleman from Michigan (Mr.\nO'Hara) makes the point of order that\nthe amendment offered by the gen-\ntleman from Louisiana (Mr. Moore) is\nnot germane.\nThe gentleman from Louisiana (Mr.\nMoore) has been kind enough to sub-\nmit a copy of his amendment in ad-\nvance, and the Chair has had the op-\nportunity to study the amendment and\nto read the report of the committee,\nand the bill.\nThe Chair would state that the fun-\ndamental purpose of the bill is to per-\nmit under certain conditions situs\nstrikes which are, as the result of a\nSupreme Court decision, considered to\nbe unfair labor practices under section\n8(b) of the National Labor Relations\nAct.\nThe Chair notes that the amendment\nprovides a civil remedy for violation of\nthe provisions of the amendment. The\nact itself, in another section, provides\nremedies for unfair labor practices.\nThe remedy proposed here might be\ngermane to that section of the act con-\ntaining such remedies, however that\nsection of the act is not before theCommittee, and the specific amend-\nment to section 8(b)(4) of the act con-\ntained in this bill is not such an inclu-\nsive amendment to existing law as to\nopen the entire act to amendment\nunder the precedents of the House.\nThe Chair therefore finds that the\nprovision for civil remedies for unfair\nlabor practices is not germane to the\nportion of the act defining those prac-\ntices, and sustains the point of order.\nRequirement of Certification of\nElections Involving Labor\nUnionsÐAmendment Con-\ntaining Additional Cir-\ncumstances in Which Certifi-\ncation Required\n§35.24 While an amendment\nnarrowly amending one por-\ntion of existing law does not\nnecessarily open up the en-\ntire law to amendment, such\nan amendment may be\namended by adding excep-\ntions and definitions modi-\nfying its effect on that por-\ntion of law if related to the\nsame subject; thus, to an\namendment amending sec.\n10(e) of the National Labor\nRelations Act to require\nNLRB certifications of em-\nployee elections of unions as\nexclusive bargaining agents\nonly where there has been a\nsecret ballot, a substitute\namendment containing the\nsame requirement with ex-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01467 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8848DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n9.The Labor Reform Act of 1977.\n10.123 C ONG. REC. 32607, 32608, 95th\nCong. 1st Sess.\n11.William H. Natcher (Ky.).ceptions where an employer\nhas been shown to have un-\ndermined the election or is\notherwise estopped from\nchallenging the election was\nheld germane as a restate-\nment of the original amend-\nment with related excep-\ntions.\nDuring consideration of H.R.\n8410(9)in the Committee of the\nWhole on Oct. 6, 1977,(10)the\nChair overruled a point of order\nagainst the amendment described\nabove. The proceedings were as\nfollows:\nTHECHAIRMAN :(11)If there are no\nadditional amendments to section 8,\nthe Clerk will read.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nSec. 9. (a) The third sentence of\nsubsection 10(e) is amended by in-\nserting immediately before the pe-\nriod at the end therof a comma and\nthe following: ``nor shall any objec-\ntion be considered by the court un-\nless a petition for review pursuant to\nsubsection (f) of this section has been\ntimely filed by the party stating the\nobjection''. ...\nMR. [J OHN M.] A SHBROOK [of Ohio]:\nMr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr.\nAshbrook: Amend Section 9 by re-\nnumbering subsection (b) thereof as\n(c) and inserting the following new\nsubsection 9(b):``(b) The fourth sentence of Section\n10(e) is amended to read as follows:\n``The findings of the Board with re-\nspect to questions of fact if supported\nby substantial evidence on the record\nconsidered as a whole shall be con-\nclusive, Provided, That no finding of\nthe Board that a representative is\nthe exclusive representative of the\nemployees in a unit for purposes of\ncollective bargaining shall be accept-\ned by the court unless such rep-\nresentative has been certified by the\nBoard after a secret ballot election\nconducted in accordance with Section\n9(c).''. ..\nMR. [W ILLIAM D.] F ORD of Michigan:\nMr. Chairman, I offer an amendment\nas a substitute for the amendment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Ford of\nMichigan as a substitute for the\namendment offered by Mr. Ashbrook:\nAmend section 9 by renumbering\nsubsection (b) thereof as (c) and in-\nserting the following new subsection\n9(b):\n``(b) The fourth sentence of section\n10(e) is amended to read as follows:\n``The findings of the Board with re-\nspect to questions of fact if supported\nby substantial evidence on the record\nconsidered as a whole shall be con-\nclusive: Provided, That no finding of\nthe Board that a representative is\nthe exclusive representative of the\nemployees in a unit for purposes of\ncollective bargaining shall be accept-\ned by the court unless such rep-\nresentative has been certified by the\nBoard after a secret ballot election\nconducted in accordance with sub-\nsection (c) of section 9 or has been\ndetermined to be a representative\ndefined in subsection (a) of section 9\nby the Board in an order entered\npursuant to subsection (c) of this sec-\ntion: Provided, That no such order\nshall be entered where the employer\nhas not engaged in conduct, unlawful\nunder this Act, which undermines a\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01468 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8849AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\nfree and fair election under sub-\nsection (c) of section 9: . .. provided\nfurther , That where the employer\nagrees to recognize an individual or\nlabor organization as a representa-\ntive defined in subsection (a) of sec-\ntion 9 on the basis of proof of major-\nity support other than a Board cer-\ntification and such support is in fact\ndemonstrated, the individual or\nlabor organization so chosen shall be\nconsidered to be a representative for\npurposes of subsection (a) of section\n9....\nMR. A SHBROOK : Mr. Chairman, I\nraise the point of order on the basis of\nthe Chair's previous construction of\nH.R. 8410 and amendments offered\nthereto.\nI point out to the Chair the amend-\nment offered by the gentleman from\nMichigan (Mr. Ford) is not within the\nscope of the bill. It refers in three\nplaces to section 9(a) of the National\nLabor Relations Act. Section 9(a) is not\nopened up, as the Chair can determine,\nby H.R. 8410. It is nongermane to my\namendment. It goes beyond the scope\nof my amendment. The gentleman\nfrom Michigan himself has indicated\nthat what he is trying to do is codify a\nprinciple in case law. That in effect is\na substantive effort. ...\nMR. F ORD of Michigan: . . . Mr.\nChairman, I agree with the gentleman\nthat I am attempting to codify the case\nlaw, but I thought that I was agreeing\nwith his attempt to codify the case law\nbecause we are both citing the same\ncase as authority for the language we\nwould now have as a part of the stat-\nute.\nAs to that part of the change in the\namendment that is common to both his\namendment and mine, the basis of the\ncase law we have cited is exactly thesame. Mine certainly could not be\nfound not to be germane, inasmuch as\nwe rely on exactly the same basis for\nthe language. Moreover, there is noth-\ning in my substitute that makes sub-\nstantive changes in the law with re-\nspect to the rights of employers and\nemployees. It has to do only with pro-\ncedural practices in keeping with the\nentire thrust of this bill to improve and\nstreamline and codify for that purpose\npast practices and procedures.\nWith respect to section 9 of the act,\nwhile it might be said that these proce-\ndures refer to section 9 of the act, for\nthat matter they refer to all of the act.\nBut they are limited, and this amend-\nment is limited to affecting the method\nby which these improvements achieve\nthe end of the act and not intended in\nany way to effect a substantial change\nin the sections of the act that are sub-\nject to this procedure. ...\nMR. A SHBROOK : Mr. Chairman, I\nwould merely want to reiterate that\nthe gentleman's amendment clearly re-\nfers to section 9(a). Section 9(a) has\nnot been opened up by this act. It is\nnot a proper substitute. The Chair on\nseveral occasions has taken a very\nstrict interpretation of H.R. 8410 as it\nrelates to the National Labor Relations\nAct, and I do not believe it can be\nopened up at this point inconsistent\nwith those rulings.\nTHECHAIRMAN : The Chair would\nlike to inquire of the gentleman from\nMichigan (Mr. Ford) as to how his sub-\nstitute would affect section 9(a) of the\nact.\nMR. FORD of Michigan: 9(a) of the\nbill?\nTHECHAIRMAN : In a manner not af-\nfected by the amendment offered by\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01469 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8850DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n12.The Labor Reform Act of 1977.\n13.123 C ONG. REC. 32500, 32501, 95th\nCong. 1st Sess.the gentleman from Ohio (Mr.\nAshbrook). ...\nMR. FORD of Michigan: Mr. Chair-\nman, I do not believe that I do. I be-\nlieve that the gentleman limits the\nmethod by which a collective bar-\ngaining arrangement can come into\nbeing, and we simply return to the ex-\nisting law.\nIf the gentleman would make a\nchange in existing law, we stay with\nthe existing law.\nTHECHAIRMAN : The Chair is ready\nto rule.\nThe question, of course, pertains to\nthe germaneness of the amendment of-\nfered by the gentleman from Michigan\n(Mr. Ford) as a substitute for the\namendment offered by the gentleman\nfrom Ohio (Mr. Ashbrook). That is the\ntest.\nThe substitute amendment offered\nby the gentleman from Michigan (Mr.\nFord), down to section 9, in the middle\nof the first page, contains the same\nlanguage of the amendment offered by\nthe gentleman from Ohio (Mr.\nAshbrook). From that point in the sub-\nstitute, the Chair is of the opinion that\nthe substitute sets forth exceptions to\nthe Ashbrook amendment and incor-\nporates definitions contained in section\n9(a) of the act without amending other\nsections of the law, and it seems to be\nrelated to and is germane to the\namendment offered by the gentleman\nfrom Ohio (Mr. Ashbrook).\nTherefore, the Chair overrules the\npoint of order.\nProcedural Rules Governing\nLabor Organization and\nElectionsÐAmendment Relat-\ning to Unfair Labor Practices\n§35.25 Where the pending sec-\ntion of a bill proposes toamend existing law in one\nparticular, an amendment to\nfurther amend the law in an-\nother respect unrelated to\nthe pending portion of the\nbill and to the portion of ex-\nisting law which it amends is\nnot germane; thus, to a sec-\ntion of a bill amending that\nsection of the National Labor\nRelations Act relating to pro-\ncedural rules governing\nlabor elections and organiza-\ntion, an amendment chang-\ning the same section of exist-\ning law to require the pro-\nmulgation of rules defining\ncertain conduct as grounds\nfor voiding a labor election\nwas held not germane, where\nneither the pending section\nnor the bill itself addressed\nthe subject of unfair labor\npractices as dealt with in an-\nother section of existing law.\nDuring consideration of H.R.\n8410(12)in the Committee of the\nWhole on Oct. 5, 1977,(13)the\nChair sustained a point of order\nagainst the amendment described\nabove. The proceedings were as\nfollows:\nMR. [J OHN M.] A SHBROOK [of Ohio]:\nMr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01470 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8851AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\nAmendment offered by Mr.\nAshbrook: Page 17, line 5, insert ``(i)''\nafter ``(A)'' and insert the following\nnew subparagraph (ii) after line 15:\n``(ii) which shall assure that the\nexpressing of any views, arguments,\nopinion, or the making of any state-\nment (including expressions intended\nto influence the outcome of an orga-\nnizing campaign, a bargaining con-\ntroversy, a strike, lockout, or other\nlabor dispute), or the dissemination\nthereof, whether in written, printed,\ngraphic, visual, or auditory form,\nshall not constitute grounds for, or\nevidence justifying, setting aside the\nresults of any election conducted\nunder any of the provisions of this\nAct, if such expression contains no\nthreat of reprisal or force or promise\nof benefit.''. ..\nMR. [W ILLIAM D.] F ORD [of Michi-\ngan]: Mr. Chairman, I insist upon my\npoint of order. ...\nMr. Chairman, the amendment of-\nfered is to section 3 of the bill, which\nin its present form amends section 6 of\nthe National Labor Relations Act,\nwhich is the rulemaking authority of\nthat act. Under section 3, the Board is\ndirected to make rules that: First, af-\nfect union actions during representa-\ntion campaigns; second, define classes\nof representation cases; and third,\nschedules governing the holding of\nelections.\nThe amendment proposed effectively\nchanges section 8(c) of the National\nLabor Relations Act, not before us in\nthis bill, which deals with unfair labor\npractices. As such, it is not directed at\nthe limited subject and scope of this\nbill in dealing with rulemaking amend-\nments, as H.R. 8410 directs.\nIt is not in keeping with the act, and\nthe bill, which provides broad discre-\ntion to the Board in its rulemaking ca-pacity. Rather, it restricts absolutely\nthe nature and substance of the rule\nthe Board is directed to make.\nThe amendment deals not only with\norganization campaign and representa-\ntion cases, which is the subject matter\nof this bill, but with strikes, lockouts,\nand other labor disputes which are not\nwithin the parameters of H.R. 8410, or\nsection 3 of the committee bill.\nMr. Chairman, the amendment is\ntherefore nongermane. ...\nMR. A SHBROOK : Mr. Chairman, on\npage 17 of the bill, starting with line 1\nof this act, it says:\nThe Board shall within 12 months\nafter the date of enactment of the\nLabor Reform Act of 1977 issue regu-\nlations to implement the provisions\nof section 9(c)(6) including rulesÐ\nAnd it goes on, as a matter of fact,\non lines 3 through 15 in the subject\nmatter we just dispensed with a few\nmoments ago. We specifically dealt\nwith the subject matter of both em-\nployers and employees attempting free\nspeech, speaking to those employees, I\nthink, going back again to page 16 and\ntalking about making the regulations,\nreferring to rules and regulations as\nmay be necessary to carry out the pro-\nvisions of this act.\nMr. Chairman, in the very preamble\nof this act it says:\nTo amend the National Labor Re-\nlations Act to strengthen the rem-\nedies and expedite the procedures\nunder such Act.\nMr. Chairman, I feel that this\namendment, calling upon the Board to\nissue rules, in addition to the rules\nthat are in H.R. 8410, is within the pa-\nrameters of the debate and therefore\nthe point of order should be overruled.\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01471 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8852DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n14.William H. Natcher (Ky.).15.The Labor Reform Act of 1977.\n16.123 C ONG. REC. 32507, 32508, 95th\nCong. 1st Sess.THE CHAIRMAN :(14)The Chair is\nready to rule.\nThe Chair has carefully followed the\nremarks of both gentlemen. The Chair\nis of the opinion that the point of order\nmade by the gentleman from Michigan\n(Mr. Ford) should be sustained.\nThe Chair would like to state that\nunder section 3 of the committee bill\nthat is now before the Committee it\namends section 6 of the National Labor\nRelations Act and restates the existing\nauthority of the NLRB to promulgate\nrules and regulations to carry out the\nprovisions of the act, specifically in-\ncluding certain authority to make pro-\ncedural rules governing elections and\ngoverning the period of initial stages of\norganizational activity. The section of\nthe bill does not go to newly mandated\ndirections to the Board to promulgate\nregulations to implement section 8 of\nthe act.\nThe amendment offered by the gen-\ntleman from Ohio (Mr. Ashbrook),\nwhile not directly amending section 8\nof the act, would amend section 6 of\nthe act to direct the Board to promul-\ngate regulations, and the amendment\nwould by its terms elevate those regu-\nlations to a position of substantive law,\nwhich regulations would conclusively\npronounce what conduct shall or shall\nnot constitute grounds for setting aside\nan election.\nIn such form, the amendment goes\nbeyond the issue of implementing rule-\nmaking authority and deals directly\nwith the question of whether conduct,\nfor the first time, would constitute an\nunfair labor practice beyond the period\nof initial stages of organizational activ-\nity, a matter not addressed by the com-\nmittee bill in section 3.Therefore, the point of order is sus-\ntained.\n§35.26 To a section of a bill\nnarrowly amending one sec-\ntion of existing law dealing\nwith procedural rules gov-\nerning labor elections and\norganization, an amendment\nto require promulgation of\nrules defining unfair labor\npractices, a subject covered\nin another section of the law\nbut not addressed in the\npending section of the bill,\nwas held to be not germane.\nDuring consideration of H.R.\n8410(15)in the Committee of the\nWhole on Oct. 5, 1977,(16)the\nChair, in sustaining a point of\norder against the amendment de-\nscribed above, reiterated the prop-\nosition that an amendment must\nbe germane to the section of the\nbill to which it is offered. The pro-\nceedings were as follows:\nMR. [J OHN M.] A SHBROOK [of Ohio]:\nMr. Chairman, I offer an amend-\nment. ...\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr.\nAshbrook: Page 19, after line 5, in-\nsert the following new paragraph (c):\n``(c) The Board shall within three\nmonths after the date of enactment\nof the Labor Reform Act of 1977,\nissue rules or regulations to imple-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01472 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8853AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n17.William H. Natcher (Ky.).ment the provisions of section 8(b)(1)\nincluding rules which shall assure\nthat no labor organization shall\nthreaten or impose an unreasonable\ndisciplinary fine or other economic\nsanction against any person in the\nexercise of rights under the Act (in-\ncluding but not limited to the right\nto refrain from any or all concerted\nactivity or to invoke the processes of\nthe Board).''\nMR. [F RANK ] THOMPSON [Jr., of New\nJersey]: Mr. Chairman, I make a point\nof order against the amendment. ...\nMr. Chairman, the amendment of-\nfered by my colleague and friend from\nOhio (Mr. Ashbrook), although in some\nways meritorious, is offered to section\n3 of the bill which amends section 6 of\nthe National Labor Relations Act, the\nrulemaking authority. Under section 3,\nthe Board is directed to make rules,\nfirst, that assure equal access during\nrepresentation campaigns, which we\nhave done; second, that define classes\nof representation cases; and three,\nschedules governing the holding of\nelections.\nThe amendment offered, in effect,\nchanges section 8 of the act relating to\nunfair labor practices. It is directed,\ntherefore, at a subject not con-\ntemplated in the bill and establishes a\nnew unfair labor practice, and is not\ngermane to the committee bill or to\nsection 3. ...\nMR. ASHBROOK : . . . I believe this\ndoes come under the general rule-\nmaking. It is in section 6. Further-\nmore, when we refer to willful viola-\ntions, on page 22, in section 7, this bill\ndoes refer to unfair labor practices,\nand I think under the previous prece-\ndents established, where we open up a\nsection referring to unfair labor prac-\ntices, it is now not timely for the chair-man to say that this bill does not\namend unfair labor practices. Section 7\nclearly refers to unfair labor practices,\nas does my amendment to section 3,\nand I would hope the Chair would\noverrule the point of order.\nTHE CHAIRMAN :(17)The Chair is\nready to rule.\nThe gentleman from Ohio (Mr.\nAshbrook) has offered an amendment\nthat, while not directly amending sec-\ntion 8 of the act, would amend section\n6 of the act to direct the Board to pro-\nmulgate regulations. The amendment\nwould really reach issues of sub-\nstantive law, since the regulations\nwould conclusively pronounce that cer-\ntain union conduct shall constitute an\nunfair labor practice under section 8.\nIn such form, the amendment goes be-\nyond the issue of implementing rule-\nmaking authority and deals directly\nwith the question of conduct which for\nthe first time would constitute an un-\nfair labor practice beyond the period of\ninitial stages of organizational activity,\na matter not addressed by the com-\nmittee bill in section 3.\nThe reference of the gentleman from\nOhio to the provisions of section 7 does\nnot alter the fact that an amendment\nmust be germane to the pending sec-\ntion.\nFor that reason, the Chair must sus-\ntain the point of order.\nProvisions Affecting Ceiling\nPrices Applicable to Certain\nPersonal ServicesÐAmend-\nment Affecting Prices Appli-\ncable to Manufacturers\n§35.27 To a committee amend-\nment making price and wage\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01473 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8854DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n18.H.R. 3871 (Committee on Banking\nand Currency).\n19.97 C ONG. REC. 8322, 82d Cong. 1st\nSess., July 17, 1951.20.Wilbur D. Mills (Ark.).\n1.H.J. Res. 251 (Committee on Bank-\ning and Currency).\n2.81 C ONG. REC. 3353, 75th Cong. 1st\nSess., Apr. 9, 1937.ceilings inapplicable to serv-\nices of barbers and beau-\nticians, an amendment to\ngovern ceiling prices ``appli-\ncable to manufacturers or\nprocessors for any item of\nmaterial derived . . . from an\nagricultural commodity,'' was\nheld to be not germane.\nIn the 82d Congress, a bill(18)\nwas under consideration com-\nprising amendments to the De-\nfense Production Act of 1950. To a\ncommittee amendment as de-\nscribed above, the following\namendment was offered:(19)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [William\nR.] Poage [of Texas]: Page 18, after\nline 4, insert the following:\n(j) Section 402 of the Defense Pro-\nduction Act of 1950 is hereby amend-\ned by adding at the end thereof a\nnew subsection reading as follows:\n``It shall be unlawful to establish\nor maintain any ceiling price appli-\ncable to manufacturers or processors\nfor any item of material derived in\nwhole or in substantial part from an\nagricultural commodity if such ceil-\ning price for any such item of mate-\nrial is fixed and maintained at less\nthan the sum of the following:\n``(1) The current cost of the mate-\nrial used ...\n``(2) All costs currently incurred in\nthe processing or manufacturing op-\neration and distribution of such\nitem ...\n``(3) A reasonable profit. ...''Mr. Wright Patman, of Texas,\nhaving raised a point of order\nagainst the amendment, the\nChairman(20)ruled as follows:\nThe Chair feels that the purpose of\nthe amendment is not germane to the\ncommittee amendment and therefore\nthe Chair sustains the point of order.\nPersons Eligible for Disaster\nLoansÐAmendment Adding\n``Freeze'' to Types of Disaster\nIncluded Within Terms\n§35.28 To a bill enlarging the\nclass of persons eligible\nunder existing law for loans\nnecessitated by ``floods or\nother catastrophes,'' an\namendment modifying the\ntitle of the existing act ex-\npressly to include ``freeze'' as\none form of disaster to be in-\ncluded within the terms of\nthe bill was held to be not\ngermane.\nIn the 75th Congress, a bill(1)\nwas under consideration to extend\nthe lending authority of the Dis-\naster Loan Corporation. The pur-\nposes of the bill were explained as\nfollows:(2)\nMR. [H ENRY B.] S TEAGALL [of Ala-\nbama]: ... It will be remembered\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01474 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8855AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n3.William B. Bankhead (Ala.).4.H.R. 7500 (Committee on Foreign Af-\nfairs).\n5.105 C ONG. REC. 11297, 86th Cong.\n1st Sess., June 17, 1959.that on February 11, 1937, we passed\nan act for the establishment of the Dis-\naster Loan Corporation to be officered\nby officials of the Reconstruction Fi-\nnance Corporation for the purpose of\nmaking loans to sufferers from disas-\nters during the year 1937. ...\nThe provisions of the pending resolu-\ntion extend the benefits of the act of\nFebruary 11, 1937, to sufferers from\ndisasters during the year 1936, so that\nanybody who was not taken care of\nunder the former act will be eligible for\nloans under the recent legislation. Vic-\ntims of disasters in 1936 will share in\nthe benefits of the recent act. ...\nThe following amendment was\noffered to the bill:\nAmendment offered by Mr. [Thomas\nF.] Ford of California: On page 1, line\n4, after the word ``floods'', add a comma\nand the word ``freeze.''\nMr. Steagall having raised a\npoint of order against the amend-\nment, the Speaker(3)ruled as fol-\nlows:\nThe amendment offered by the gen-\ntleman from California [Mr. Ford] pro-\nposes to amend the title of an existing\nlaw. The Chair is of the opinion that\nan amendment to the title of an exist-\ning act is not germane to the sub-\nstantive matter of the proposed joint\nresolution, and, therefore, sustains the\npoint of order.\nMutual Security ActÐAmend-\nment Modifying Provisions\nAffecting Use of Surplus Agri-\ncultural Commodities\n§35.29 To a bill amending the\nMutual Security Act of 1954,an amendment, offered for\npurposes of modifying that\npart of the act relating to the\nuse of surplus agricultural\ncommodities, which sought\nto give the President the au-\nthority to furnish surplus ag-\nricultural commodities to the\nUnited Nations for certain\npurposes was held to be ger-\nmane.\nIn the 86th Congress, during\nconsideration of a bill(4)to amend\nthe Mutual Security Act of 1954,\nthe following amendment was of-\nfered:(5)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [Leonard\nG.] Wolf [of Iowa]: On page 8, line 16,\nstrike out the quotation mark and im-\nmediately below line 16 insert the fol-\nlowing:\nSec. 401A. (a) In keeping with the\npurpose and objective of the Mutual\nSecurity Act, to assist in stabilizing\neconomies . .. and to help eliminate\nfamines and hunger in ways that\nwill promote economic development,\nthe President is authorized . .. to\nfurnish, without charge, to the\nUnited Nations or to any agency\nthereof, from stocks of the Com-\nmodity Credit Corporation, commod-\nities which are surplus, as deter-\nmined by the Secretary of Agri-\nculture. ...\nMr. John Taber, of New York,\nmade the point of order that the\namendment was not germane to\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01475 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8856DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n6.Wilbur D. Mills (Ark.).\n7.105 C ONG. REC. 11298, 86th Cong.\n1st Sess., June 17, 1959.\n8.S. 2130 (Committee on Foreign Af-\nfairs).9.103 C ONG. REC. 12007, 12008, 85th\nCong. 1st Sess., July 17, 1957.\n10.Id. at p. 12008.the bill. The Chairman,(6)in rul-\ning on the point of order, stated:(7)\nThe Chair has had an opportunity to\nexamine the amendment, also the Mu-\ntual Security Act of 1954, as amended,\nparticularly title IV thereof, which has\nto do with special assistance and other\nprograms, and calls attention to the\nfact that in title IV there is specific\nmention of surplus agricultural com-\nmodities pursuant to the Agricultural\nTrade, Development, and Assistance\nAct of 1954.\nThe Chair feels that this amendment\nis germane to the bill now before the\nCommittee, and, therefore, overrules\nthe point of order made by the gen-\ntleman from New York.\nÐAdditional Sense of Congress\nExpression\n§35.30 Where a bill under con-\nsideration reenacted and\namended the Mutual Secu-\nrity Act of 1954, an amend-\nment adding to the state-\nments of congressional policy\ncontained in the act a fur-\nther statement of policy\nwhich related to treaties af-\nfecting jurisdiction over\nAmerican military personnel\nin foreign countries was held\nto be germane.\nIn the 85th Congress, a bill(8)\nwas under consideration to amendthe Mutual Security Act of 1954.\nTo such bill, the following amend-\nment was offered:(9)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [Omar\nT.] Burleson [of Texas]: On page 1,\nafter line 4, insert: Section 2 of the\nMutual Security Act of 1954, as\namended, which expresses a statement\nof policy, is amended by the addition of\nthe following paragraph at the end of\nthe statement:\n(a) It is the sense of the Congress\n... that in order to . .. maintain\nthe rights and privileges for our citi-\nzens who are serving with our\nArmed Forces in other countries . ..\nthe President should forthwith ad-\ndress to the North Atlantic Council\n... a request for revision of article\nVII of (the NATO Status of Forces\nAgreement) for the purpose of elimi-\nnating or modifying article VII so\nthat the United States may exercise\nexclusive criminal jurisdiction over\nAmerican military personnel sta-\ntioned within the boundaries of par-\nties to the treaty. ...\nA point of order against the\namendment was raised by Mr. Al-\nbert S. J. Carnahan, of Missouri,\nwho stated:(10)\nMr. Chairman, the Mutual Security\nAct of 1954, which the bill S. 2130\nseeks to amend, states in its statement\nof policy among other things that the\nCongress of the United States ``de-\nclares it to be the policy of the United\nStates to continue as long as such dan-\nger to the peace of the world and to the\nsecurity of the United States persists\nto make available to free nations and\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01476 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8857AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n11.Id. at pp. 12008, 12009. 12.Id. at p. 12009.peoples upon request, assistance of\nsuch nature and in such amounts as\nthe United States deems advisable,\ncompatible with its own stability,\nstrength, and other obligations, and as\nmay be needed and effectively used by\nsuch free nations and peoples to help\nthem maintain their freedom.''\nThis legislation does not provide for\nthe conduct, management, or regula-\ntion of American forces abroad. Con-\nsequently, the amendment is not ger-\nmane.\nSpeaking in support of the point\nof order, Mr. John M. Vorys, of\nOhio, stated:(11)\nMr. Chairman, on page 407 of the\nRules of the House of Representatives\non the matter of germaneness appears\nthe statement that to a bill modifying\nan existing law as to one specific par-\nticular an amendment relating to the\nterms of the law other than those dealt\nwith by the bill is not germane. Vol-\nume V, page 806, of Cannon's Prece-\ndents is cited and there are other cita-\ntions as well.\nMr. Chairman, this amendment at-\ntempts to amend the purpose clauses\nof the mutual security law, which is a\npart of the bill which is not amended\nby the amendment contained in the\nbill, S. 2130, which is now before the\nHouse. ... In addition, the amend-\nment . .. would amend the Uniform\nCode of Military Justice. Article 14 of\nthe code provides that under such reg-\nulations as the Secretary concerned\nmay prescribe, a member of the Armed\nForces accused of an offense against\ncivil authority may be delivered upon\nrequest to the civil authority for trial.Article 5 of the same code says:\n``This chapter applies in all places.''\nSo that this would purport to amend\nthe Uniform Code of Military Jus-\ntice. ...\nOther Members spoke on the\npoint of order, as follows:(12)\nMR. [JAMES G.] F ULTON [of Pennsyl-\nvania]: Mr. Chairman, certainly in the\nfirst place the method of trial of United\nStates troops stationed abroad is not\ngermane in an economic and military\naid bill for foreign countries.\nSecondly, attention should be called\nto the statement that has been made\nby the gentleman from Ohio that the\nrevision of United States treaties or ex-\necutive agreements in this type of a\nbill is clearly not germane to the pur-\npose of the bill.\nThirdly, as stated by the gentleman\nfrom Texas, the sponsor of the par-\nticular amendment, if his purpose is\ndirectly or indirectly to have a reduc-\ntion effect upon the number of armed\nUnited States forces abroad or the\nnumber of military people in our mili-\ntary installations, that policy is clearly\na matter of jurisdiction of the House\nArmed Services Committee, and is not\nin any way connected with or germane\nto this legislation. ...\nMR. [F RANK T.] B OW[of Ohio]: . ..\nThis amendment merely amends the\npurpose clauses of the act of 1954, in\nwhich there are other purposes other\nthan the ones which have been re-\nferred to. This does not attempt to\namend the treaty. ... It simply ex-\npresses the sense of the Congress that\nthe President take some action to at-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01477 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8858DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n13.Jere Cooper (Tenn.).\n14.103 C ONG. REC. 12010, 85th Cong.\n1st Sess., July 17, 1957.15.H.R. 11921 (Committee on Foreign\nAffairs).tempt to renegotiate and place no man-\ndatory provisions at all upon the Presi-\ndent. It simply expresses the will of\nthe Congress under the purpose\nclauses of this legislation, as a matter\nof policy. ...\nMR. [W INSTON L.] P ROUTY [of\nVermont]: . .. I think if we look at the\nproposed amendment we will find it\ndeals with a different subject matter.\nThe subject matter of the bill S. 2130\nis mutual security. The subject matter\nof the amendment is qualification of\ntreaties or other international agree-\nments. ...\nMr. Vorys further observed:\n... The fact that it is a policy state-\nment rather than a direct amendment\ndoes not make it any the more ger-\nmane.\nThe Chairman,(13)in ruling on\nthe point of order, stated:(14)\nAttention is . .. invited to the fact\nthat the amendment does not seek to\namend the treaty-making powers, it\ndoes not seek to amend the Code of\nMilitary Justice. It simply expresses\nthe sense of Congress that the Presi-\ndent should forthwith address to the\nNorth Atlantic Council, and so forth. It\nis an expression of the sense of Con-\ngress going one step further than the\nexpressions of the sense of Congress\nprovided in the Mutual Security Act of\n1954. ...\n... [T]he Chair is of the opinion\nthat the amendment is an additional\nexpression of the sense of Congress in\nline with the expressions of the senseof Congress contained in the Mutual\nSecurity Act of 1954, it is germane to\nthe pending bill, and, therefore, over-\nrules the point of order.\nBill Amending Foreign Assist-\nance ActÐAmendment to Law\nReferred to in Act\n§35.31 To a bill amending the\nForeign Assistance Act of\n1961, which had authorized\nthe use of funds generated\nunder the Agricultural Trade\nDevelopment and Assistance\nAct of 1954, an amendment\noffered as a new section\nwhich sought to amend the\nAgricultural Trade Develop-\nment and Assistance Act of\n1954 by adding further provi-\nsions relating to agreements\nwith foreign nations under\nwhich such funds were gen-\nerated, specifically with re-\nspect to the power of the\nPresident to negotiate agree-\nments with foreign nations\nfor sale of surplus commod-\nities in exchange for foreign\ncurrencies, was held to be\ngermane.\nIn the 87th Congress, during\nconsideration of a bill(15)amend-\ning the Foreign Assistance Act of\n1961, the following amendment\nwas offered which related to the\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01478 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8859AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n16.108 C ONG. REC. 13431, 87th Cong.\n2d Sess., July 12, 1962.17.Id. at pp. 13431, 13432.\n18.Wilbur D. Mills (Ark.).power of the President to nego-\ntiate agreements for the sale of\nsurplus commodities in exchange\nfor foreign currencies:(16)\nAmendment offered by Mr. Barry:\nOn page 16, after line 15 insert the fol-\nlowing:\nSec. 404. Section 101(f) of the Ag-\nricultural Trade Development and\nAssistance Act of 1954, as amended,\nis amended to read as follows:\n``(f) obtain rates of exchange appli-\ncable to the sale of commodities in\nEuropean countries under such\nagreements which are not less favor-\nable than the highest of exchange\nrates legally obtainable from the\nGovernment or agencies thereof in\nthe respective countries.''\nIn regard to the amendment,\nthe proponent, Mr. Robert R.\nBarry, of New York, stated:\nMr. Chairman, the amendment\nwhich I am proposing is intended to\nassure that our surplus farm commod-\nities are sold on best possible termsÐ\nspecifically, at rates of exchange not\nless favorable than the highest rates\nlegally obtainable from the govern-\nments, or governmental agencies, of\nthe purchasing countries.\nA point of order against the\namendment was explained as fol-\nlows:\nMR. [H AROLD D.] C OOLEY [of North\nCarolina]: Mr. Chairman, the amend-\nment here is to Public Law 480, which\nis the Agricultural Act, and the par-\nticular section to which it is addressed\nis section 101(f) of Public Law 480.That is not now before the House. The\ngentleman's amendment is not ger-\nmane to any section of the bill. I there-\nfore insist on the point of order.\nThe following exchange(17)re-\nlated to the point of order:\nTHECHAIRMAN :(18)The burden of\nproof is always on the person who pro-\nposes an amendment. ...\nMR. BARRY : I believe it is germane.\nTherefore, I am asking for a ruling to\nsustain my belief.\nTHECHAIRMAN : The bill before the\nCommittee, H.R. 11921, to amend fur-\nther the Foreign Assistance Act of\n1961, as amended, and for other pur-\nposes, refers, of course, to the act of\n1961. In the act of 1961 itself specific\nprovision was made for amendment of\nthe Agricultural Trade Development\nand Assistance Act of 1954, to which\nthe amendment offered by the gen-\ntleman from New York refers.\nThe Chair believes that the subject\nmatter of the Agricultural Trade De-\nvelopment and Assistance Act of 1954\nis included within the purview of the\nForeign Assistance Act of 1961, which\nis the bill before the Committee and,\ntherefore, feels that the amendment of-\nfered by the gentleman from New York\n[Mr. Barry] is germane to the bill. The\nChair overrules the point of order.\nÐAmendment Relating To Sub-\nject Matter Stricken From\nBill\n§35.32 To a bill amending the\nForeign Assistance Act of\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01479 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8860DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n19.H.R. 11921 (Committee on Foreign\nAffairs).\n20.See 108 C ONG. R EC. 13428, 87th\nCong. 2d Sess., July 12, 1962.\n1.Id. at p. 13431. 2.Wilbur D. Mills (Ark.).1961 and other general laws\nrelated to the mutual secu-\nrity program, an amendment\nrelating to the appointment\nof Members to attend the\nNATO Parliamentary Con-\nferences, which had been the\nsubject matter of a provision\nstricken from the bill, was\nheld to be not germane.\nIn the 87th Congress, the For-\neign Assistance Act of 1962(19)\nwas under consideration, con-\ntaining the following provision:(20)\nPARTIVÐA MENDMENTS TO OTHER\nLAWS\nSec. 403. The first section of the Act\nentitled ``An Act to authorize participa-\ntion by the United States in the Inter-\nparliamentary Union,'' approved June\n28, 1935, as amended (22 U.S.C. 276),\nis amended by adding at the end there-\nof the following: ``Not less than two of\nthe principal delegates to each of the\nConferences of the Interparliamentary\nUnion shall be members of the House\nCommittee on Foreign Affairs, and not\nless than two of such delegates shall be\nmembers of the Senate Committee on\nForeign Relations.''\nThe above provision having\nbeen stricken, the following\namendment was offered to the\nbill:(1)Amendment offered by Mr. [Robert\nR.] Barry [of New York]: On page 16,\nafter line 15, insert the following:\nSec. 404. The first section of the\nAct entitled ``An Act to authorize\nparticipation by the United States in\nparliamentary conferences of the\nNorth Atlantic Treaty Organization,''\napproved July 11, 1956, is amended\nby adding at the end thereof the fol-\nlowing: ``Of the appointments made\nby the Speaker of the House not less\nthan two shall be members of the\nForeign Affairs Committee.''\nA point of order was raised\nagainst the amendment, as fol-\nlows:\nMR. [W AYNE L.] H AYS[of Ohio]: . ..\n[The amendment] deals with an act of\nCongress which is a separate act, and\nwhich is not contained in this bill.\nSince section 403 has been stricken,\nthere is nothing in this bill about any\ninterparliamentary group whatever.\nTherefore it is not germane to the bill.\nThe Chairman,(2)in ruling on\nthe point of order, stated:\n... Just a moment ago section 403\nwas stricken from the bill. That section\nwas the only section that had anything\nto do with any international group.\nThis amendment refers to parliamen-\ntary conferences of the North Atlantic\nTreaty Organization. The bill itself has\nthe purpose of further amending the\nForeign Assistance Act of 1961, as\namended, and for other purposes.\nThe Chair is of the opinion that the\namendment offered by the gentleman\nfrom New York [Mr. Barry] under the\ncircumstances goes beyond the purport\nof the bill, and therefore sustains the\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01480 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8861AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n3.108 C ONG. REC. 13432, 87th Cong.\n2d Sess., July 12, 1962. See Sec.\n35.34, infra, for fuller treatment of\nthis precedent.\n4.H.R. 11921 (Committee on Foreign\nAffairs).\n5.108 C ONG. REC. 13432, 87th Cong.\n2d Sess., July 12, 1962. 6.Wilbur D. Mills (Ark.).point of order raised by the gentleman\nfrom Ohio [Mr. Hays].\nAmendments to Other Acts\n§35.33 To a bill amending the\nForeign Assistance Act of\n1961, amendments to the Mu-\ntual Security Act of 1954 and\nthe Legislative Appropria-\ntion Act of 1961, were con-\nceded to be not germane.(3)\nForeign AssistanceÐAmend-\nment Relating to Committee\nExpenses for Foreign Travel\n§35.34 To a bill authorizing\ngeneral foreign assistance\nprograms, an amendment re-\nlating to reports on com-\nmittee expenditures for for-\neign travel was conceded to\nbe not germane.\nDuring consideration of the For-\neign Assistance Act of 1961,(4)the\nfollowing amendment was offered\nas a new section:(5)\nSec. 404. (a) Subsection (b) of section\n502 of the Mutual Security Act of 1954\nis amended by inserting immediately\nbefore the last sentence thereof the fol-lowing new sentences: ``No such report\nshall contain any miscellaneous item\nor other item grouping together under\na general heading expenditures for dis-\nsimilar purposes but shall specify, item\nby item, each individual expendi-\nture. ...''\n(b) Subsection (b) of section 105 of\nthe Legislative Branch Appropriation\nAct, 1961, is amended by inserting im-\nmediately before the last sentence\nthereof the following new sentences:\n``No such report shall contain any\nmiscellaneous item. ...''\nA point of order was raised\nagainst the amendment, as fol-\nlows:\nMR. [W AYNE L.] H AYS[of Ohio]: Mr.\nChairman, I make a point of order\nagainst the amendment on the ground\nagain that there is nothing in this bill\nrelating to the expenditure of com-\nmittee funds, of select or special com-\nmittees, or traveling committees and,\ntherefore, the amendment is not ger-\nmane to the bill.\nThe following exchange then oc-\ncurred:\nMR. [H AROLD R.] G ROSS [of Iowa]:\nMr. Chairman, I concede the point of\norder.\nTHE CHAIRMAN :(6)The gentleman\nfrom Iowa concedes the point of\norder. ...\nMilitary Assistance to Foreign\nNationsÐTransfer of Military\nEquipment to Israel\n§35.35 To a bill authorizing\nforeign assistance and\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01481 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8862DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n7.114 C ONG. REC. 22098, 90th Cong.\n2d Sess., July 18, 1968. See § 35.36,\ninfra.\n8.H.R. 15263 (Committee on Foreign\nAffairs).\n9.114 C ONG. REC. 22098, 90th Cong.\n2d Sess., July 18, 1968. 10.Charles M. Price (Ill.).amending several provisions\nof the basic law relating to\nmilitary assistance, an\namendment authorizing the\nPresident to negotiate with\nIsrael concerning the sale to\nthat nation of certain mili-\ntary equipment was held to\nbe germane.(7)\n§35.36 To a bill amending\nthose provisions of the For-\neign Assistance Act of 1961\nrelating to military assist-\nance to foreign nations, an\namendment authorizing the\ntransfer of military planes to\nIsrael under conditions and\nprocedures compatible with\nthe basic law was held to be\ngermane.\nIn the 90th Congress, during\nconsideration of the Foreign As-\nsistance Act of 1968,(8)the fol-\nlowing amendment was offered:(9)\nAmendment offered to the committee\namendments offered by Mr. [Lester L.]\nWolff [of New York]: on page 11, line 9,\nafter the Conte amendment insert:\n(d) The President shall take such\nsteps as may be necessary . .. to\nnegotiate an agreement with theGovernment of Israel providing for\nthe sale by the United States of not\nless than 50 military planes. ...\nA point of order was raised\nagainst the amendment, as fol-\nlows:\nMR. [W AYNE L.] H AYS [of Ohio]: I\nraise a point of order against the\namendment because it would order the\nPresident to make an affirmative de-\ntermination. It has been ruled here\nmany times that one cannot do that.\nIn addition, it is not germane to the\nbill because we are coming up with a\nmilitary sales bill, and this bill has\nnothing about military sales in it. The\namendment may be germane to the\nmilitary sales bill.\nThe Chairman,(10)in ruling on\nthe point of order, stated:\n... Part II of chapter 2 of the For-\neign Assistance Act of 1961, section\n503, designating the general authority,\nstates the President is authorized to\nfurnish military assistance on such\nterms and conditions as he may deter-\nmine, to any friendly country or inter-\nnational organization, the assisting of\nwhich the President finds will\nstrengthen the security of the United\nStates and promote world peace and\nwhich is otherwise eligible to receive\nsuch assistance.\nThe Chair will hold that the amend-\nment offered by the gentleman from\nNew York further authorizes the Presi-\ndent to take such steps as may be nec-\nessary to negotiate an agreement with\nthe Government of Israel providing for\nthe sale of military planes, and is a\ncondition in keeping with the authority\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01482 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8863AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n11.H.R. 12181 (Committee on Foreign\nAffairs).\n12.104 C ONG. REC. 8751, 85th Cong. 2d\nSess., May 14, 1958. 13.Hale Boggs (La.).already given to the President in sec-\ntion 503 of the Foreign Assistance Act\nof 1961, as amended, and therefore\nholds the amendment to be germane.\nThe Chair overrules the point of order.\nBill Amending Mutual Security\nAct of 1954ÐAmendment Au-\nthorizing Librarian of Con-\ngress To Use Foreign Cur-\nrencies in Acquisitions\n§35.37 To a bill relating to\nmilitary and economic assist-\nance to foreign countries and\namending the Mutual Secu-\nrity Act of 1954, an amend-\nment was held to be not ger-\nmane which authorized the\nLibrarian of Congress to use\ndesignated foreign cur-\nrencies in connection with\nprograms for the evaluation\nand acquisition of certain\nforeign books and materials.\nIn the 85th Congress, a bill(11)\nwas under consideration amend-\ning the Mutual Security Act of\n1954. The following amendment\nwas offered to the bill:(12)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [John\nD.] Dingell [Jr., of Michigan]:\n(m) Add a new section as follows:\nSec. 519. Overseas programs relating\nto scientific and other significantworks (a) The Librarian of Congress, in\nconsultation with the National Science\nFoundation and other interested agen-\ncies, is authorized to establish pro-\ngrams outside of the United States for\n(1) the analysis and evaluation of for-\neign books . .. and other materials to\ndetermine whether they would provide\ninformation of technical or scientific\nsignificance in the United States . ..\nand the acquisition of such books. ...\n... [T]he Librarian of Congress\nmay, in carrying out the provisions of\nthis section . .. use currencies, or\ncredits for currencies, of any foreign\ngovernment (1) held or available for\nexpenditure by the United States and\nnot required by law or agreement with\nsuch government to be expended or\nused for another purpose. ...\nThe following exchange con-\ncerned a point of order raised\nagainst the amendment:\nMR. [J OHN] T ABER [of New York]:\nMr. Chairman, this amendment is not\ngermane to the bill or at this place in\nthe bill. ...\nMr. Chairman, this amendment sets\nup an outfit in the Library of Congress\nwhich is not mentioned anywhere else\nto review a great bunch of books. . ..\nTHECHAIRMAN :(13)... The Chair is\nnot, of course, passing on the merits of\nthe amendment offered by the gen-\ntleman from Michigan. The amend-\nment is obviously not germane to the\npurposes of the pending bill. The Chair\nsustains the point of order.\nA subsequent exchange con-\ncerned the timeliness of Mr.\nTaber's point of order:\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01483 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8864DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n14.The International Development and\nFood Assistance Act of 1978.15.124 C ONG. REC. 13499, 13500, 95th\nCong. 2d Sess.\n16.Elliott Levitas (Ga.).MR. [W AYNE L.] H AYS of Ohio: Mr.\nChairman, I make the point of order\nthat the gentleman from New York\n[Mr. Taber] was much too late in mak-\ning his point of order, inasmuch as the\namendment had already been read and\ndebate had started.\nTHECHAIRMAN : The gentleman from\nNew York [Mr. Taber] was on his feet\nat the time and was recognized by the\nChair as soon as the Chair saw the\ngentleman on his feet. The point of\norder of the gentleman from Ohio\ncomes too late.\nForeign Assistance to Certain\nNationsÐAmendment Requir-\ning Reports on Human Rights\nViolations by Any Nation\n§35.38 To a bill amending ex-\nisting law to authorize for-\neign economic assistance to\nnations qualifying as recipi-\nents under that law, but not\naddressing foreign relations\nwith countries not receiving\nsuch assistance, an amend-\nment to that law to require\nreports on human rights vio-\nlations by all foreign coun-\ntries, not merely those re-\nceiving aid under the law,\nwas conceded to be broader\nin scope and was ruled out\nas not germane.\nDuring consideration of H.R.\n12222(14)in the Committee of theWhole, a point of order against\nthe amendment described above\nwas conceded and sustained. The\nproceedings of May 12, 1978,(15)\nwere as follows:\nMR. [R OBERT H.] M ICHEL [of Illinois]:\nMr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Michel:\nOn page 48, immediately after line\n15, insert the following new sub-\nsection:\n``(e) Section 116(d)(1) of such Act is\namended by inserting immediately\nbefore the semicolon ``and in all\nother foreign countries (except those\ncountries with respect to which a re-\nport is transmitted pursuant [to an-\nother section] ).''\nMR. [C LEMENT J.] Z ABLOCKI [of Wis-\nconsin]: Mr. Chairman, I reserve a\npoint of order against the amend-\nment. ...\nMR. M ICHEL : ... [I]f the gentleman\ninsists on his point of order, I would\nconcede it in the interests of time.\nMr. Chairman, in the interest of\ntime I will concede the point of order\nand will offer another amendment.\nTHE CHAIRMAN :(16)The point of\norder is conceded and sustained.\nLaws Concerning State Depart-\nment and Foreign RelationsÐ\nGuidelines for Acceptance of\nForeign Gifts\n§35.39 To a House bill con-\ntaining diverse amendments\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01484 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8865AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n17.123 C ONG. R EC. 7432, 7446, 7447,\n95th Cong. 1st Sess.to existing laws within the\njurisdiction of the Committee\non International Relations,\nrelating to foreign relations\nand the operation of the De-\npartment of State and re-\nlated agencies, a portion of a\nSenate amendment thereto\ncontained in a conference re-\nport, amending the Foreign\nGifts and Decorations Act\n(within the jurisdiction of\nthe same committee) to pro-\nvide guidelines and proce-\ndures for the acceptance of\nforeign gifts by United States\nemployees and to provide\nthat the House Committee on\nStandards of Official Con-\nduct adopt regulations gov-\nerning acceptance by Mem-\nbers and House employees of\nforeign gifts, was held ger-\nmane when a point of order\nwas raised against a portion\nof the conference report\nunder Rule XXVIII, clause 4.\nThe proceedings of Aug. 3, 1977,\nrelating to the conference report\non H.R. 6689, the Foreign Rela-\ntions Authorization Act for fiscal\n1978, are discussed in § 26.28,\nsupra.\nGeneral Sanctions Offered to\nSpecific Sanctions\n§35.40 To a bill dealing with\nenforcement of United Na-tions sanctions against one\ncountry in relation to a spe-\ncific trade commodity, an\namendment permitting the\npresident to suspend all eco-\nnomic relations and commu-\nnications between the United\nStates and any other coun-\ntry, on the basis of human\nrights violations as deter-\nmined by the president, was\nheld to be not germane.\nOn Mar. 14, 1977,(17)the Com-\nmittee of the Whole had under\nconsideration H.R. 1746, amend-\ning the United Nations Participa-\ntion Act of 1945 to halt the impor-\ntation of Rhodesian chrome. The\nbill permitted the president to en-\nforce United States compliance\nwith United Nations Security\nCouncil sanctions against trade\nwith Rhodesia particularly with\nreference to the importation of\nRhodesian chrome. The pro-\nceedings were as follows:\nBe it amended by the Senate and\nHouse of Representatives of the United\nStates of America in Congress assem-\nbled, That section 5 of the United Na-\ntions Participation Act of 1945 (22\nU.S.C. 287c) is amendedÐ\n(1) by adding at the end of sub-\nsection (a) the following new sentence:\n``Any Executive order which is issued\nunder this subsection and which ap-\nplies measures against Southern Rho-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01485 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8866DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n18.Neal Smith (Iowa).desia pursuant to any United Nations\nSecurity Council Resolution may be en-\nforced, notwithstanding the provisions\nof any other law; and\n(2) by adding at the end thereof the\nfollowing new subsection:\n``(c)(1) During the period in which\nmeasures are applied against Southern\nRhodesia under subsection (a) pursu-\nant to any United Nations Security\nCouncil Resolution, a shipment of any\nsteel mill product (as such product\nmay be defined by the Secretary) con-\ntaining chromium in any form may not\nbe released from customs custody for\nentry into the United States ifÐ\n``(A) a certificate of origin with re-\nspect to such shipment has not been\nfiled with the Secretary; or\n``(B) in the case of a shipment with\nrespect to which a certificate of origin\nhas been filed with the Secretary, the\nSecretary determines that the informa-\ntion contained in such certificate does\nnot adequately establish that the steel\nmill product in such shipment does not\ncontain chromium in any form which is\nof Southern Rhodesian origin. ...\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. [El-\nliott] Levitas [of Georgia]: Strike out\nall after the enacting clause and in-\nsert in lieu thereof the following:\nThat section 5(a) of the United Na-\ntions Participation Act of 1945 is\namendedÐ\n(1) by inserting ``(1)'' immediately\nafter ``(a)''; and\n(2) by adding at the end thereof\nthe following new paragraph:\n``(2)(A) Subject to the conditions\nprescribed in subparagraph (B), if\nthe President determines that the\ngovernment of a foreign country is\nengaged in a consistent pattern ofgross violations of internationally\nrecognized human rights (including\ntorture or cruel, inhuman, or degrad-\ning treatment or punishment, pro-\nlonged detention without charges, or\nother flagrant denial of the right to\nlife, liberty, and the security of per-\nson), the President may, through any\nagency which he may designate and\nunder such orders, rules, and regula-\ntions as may be prescribed by him,\nsuspend (in whole or in part) eco-\nnomic relations or rail, sea, air, post-\nal, telegraphic, radio, and other\nmeans of communication between\nthat foreign country or any national\nthereof or any person therein and\nthe United States or any person sub-\nject to the jurisdiction thereof, or in-\nvolving any property subject to the\njurisdiction of the United\nStates. ...\nMR. [D ONALD M.] F RASER [of Min-\nnesota]: Mr. Chairman, I make the\npoint of order the amendment is not\ngermane.\nTHECHAIRMAN :(18)The Chair is pre-\npared to rule.\nThe bill deals only with United Na-\ntions sanctions against importation of\nchrome, while the amendment offered\nby the gentleman from Georgia deals\nwith embargoes and other economic\nsanctions on any material or commer-\ncial transaction. Also, the bill deals\nonly with sanctions against Rhodesia,\nboth in the title and in the body of the\nbill. The amendment offered by the\ngentleman from Georgia permits U.S.\nrather than U.N. sanctions to be im-\nposed on products or communications\nfrom any foreign country. It is the\nopinion of the Chair that the amend-\nment is not germane, and the Chair\nsustains the point of order.\n§35.41 To a bill amending ex-\nisting law for limited pur-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01486 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8867AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n19.123 C ONG. R EC. 30532±34, 95th\nCong. 1st Sess.\n20.H.R. 3, Medicare-Medicaid Antifraud\nand Abuse Amendments.\n1.Gerry E. Studds (Mass.).poses, an amendment further\nchanging that law but affect-\ning programs beyond the\nscope of the bill and the law\nbeing amended and waiving\nother inconsistent provisions\nof law is not germane.\nOn Sept. 23, 1977,(19)the Com-\nmittee of the Whole had under\nconsideration a bill(20)jointly re-\nported from the Committees on\nWays and Means and Interstate\nand Foreign Commerce to enable\nthe Department of Health, Edu-\ncation and Welfare to investigate\nand prosecute fraud and abuse in\nthe medicare and medicaid health\nprograms within their respective\njurisdictions. An amendment was\nrecommended by the Committee\non Ways and Means to prohibit\nany federal officer or employee\nfrom disclosing any identifiable\nmedical record in the absence of\npatient approval. The amendment\nwas held not germane, as exceed-\ning the scope and subject matter\nof the bill. The proceedings were\nas follows:\nTHECHAIRMAN :(1)The Clerk will re-\nport the second amendment rec-\nommended by the Committee on Ways\nand Means.\nThe Clerk read as follows:Amendment offered by the Com-\nmittee on Ways and Means: Page 66,\nstrike out line 22 down through and\nincluding line 5 on page 70 and in-\nsert in lieu thereof:\n(l)(1) Part A of title XI of such Act\n(as amended by section 3(a) of this\nAct) is amended by adding after sec-\ntion 1124 the following new section:\n``DISCLOSURE OF INDIVIDUALLY\nIDENTIFIABLE MEDICAL RECORDS\n``Sec. 1125. (a)(1) Notwithstanding\nany other provision of this Act except\nparagraph (2) of this subsection, no\nofficer, employee, or agent of the\nUnited States, or any office, agency,\nor department thereof, or any Profes-\nsional Standards Review Organiza-\ntion or any person acting or pur-\nporting to act on behalf of such Or-\nganization, may inspect, acquire, or\nrequire the disclosure of, for any rea-\nson whatever, any individually iden-\ntifiable medical record of a patient,\nunless the patient has authorized\nsuch inspection, acquisition, or dis-\nclosure in accordance with sub-\nsection (b). ...\n(2) After taking into consideration\nthe recommendations contained in\nthe final report of the Privacy Pro-\ntection Study Commission (estab-\nlished under section 5 of the Privacy\nAct of 1974), the Secretary of Health,\nEducation, and Welfare shall pre-\npare and submit, not later than\nthree months after the date such\nCommission submits its final report,\nto the Committee on Interstate and\nForeign Commerce and the Com-\nmittee on Ways and Means of the\nHouse of Representatives and to the\nCommittee on Human Resources and\nthe Committee on Finance of the\nSenate a report containing specific\nrecommendations (including draft\nlegislation) for the timely develop-\nment and implementation of appro-\npriate procedures (including use of\ndetailed written consent forms) in\norder to (A) maintain the confiden-\ntiality of individually identifiable\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01487 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8868DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\nmedical records (whether they relate\nto medical care provided directly by,\nor through the financial assistance\nof, the Federal Government or not),\nand (B) prevent the unwarranted in-\nspection by, and disclosure to, Fed-\neral officers, employees, and agents\nand Professional Standards Review\nOrganizations of such records. ...\nMR. [R ICHARDSON ] PREYER [of North\nCarolina]: Mr. Chairman, I raise a\npoint of order against the amend-\nment. ...\n[T]his amendment in its scope would\napply far beyond the purpose of the bill\nand the jurisdiction of the committee.\nThe jurisdiction of the committee and\nthe purpose of the bill is to deal with\nthe Department of Health, Education,\nand Welfare and increase the Depart-\nment's ability to investigate and pros-\necute medicare and medicaid fraud and\nabuse.\nHowever, the amendment covers not\nonly the Department of Health, Edu-\ncation, and Welfare but all the officers,\nemployees, and agents of the United\nStates. The committee report specifi-\ncally states, ``Under the bill PSRO's\nand employees or agents of the Federal\nGovernment may not inspect, acquire\nor require the disclosure of individually\nidentifiable medical records.'' The\nWays and Means Committee does not\nhave jurisdiction, for example, over the\nemployees of the Department of De-\nfense, the Veterans' Administration, or\nthe Federal courts.\nIn addition this amendment clearly\nconflicts with the Deschler precedent\nin chapter 28, section 8.1, which states\nthatÐ\nTo a bill limited in its application\nto certain departments and agencies\nof government, an amendment appli-cable to all departments and agen-\ncies is not germane.\nFinally, Mr. Chairman, I note the\namendment attempts to supersede all\nother laws and regulations of the\nUnited States in conflict with this\namendment. This violates the principle\nof the Deschler precedent in chapter\n28, section 29.4 which states thatÐ\nTo a bill referring to certain provi-\nsions of existing law, an amendment\nrepealing a portion of that law was\nheld not germane. ...\nMR. [P HILIP M.] C RANE [of Illinois]:\n... Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition\nto the point of order. The Ways and\nMeans amendment, set forth as section\n5(l) of H.R. 3 as reported by that com-\nmittee, is clearly germane to the origi-\nnal bill and the bill in its current form.\nIn the first place, Mr. Chairman,\nH.R. 3 ostensibly has as its purpose\nthe prevention of fraud and abuse in\nthe medicare and medicaid programs.\nTo achieve that objective, a very com-\nplex set of provisions were put into the\noriginal bill, including provisions in\nsection 5, that greatly strengthen the\ninvestigatory and enforcement roles of\nprofessional standards review organi-\nzations (PSRO's).\nThese organizations do not simply\nacquire and inspect records only of\nmedicare and medicaid patients, or of\ndoctors and other health professionals\nwho treat only those patients. Quite\nthe contrary is true. PSRO's are re-\nquired to compile statistically valid\n``profiles'' of patients and providers, in\norder to identify, among other things,\npatterns of suspected unnecessary\nservices and treatment that does not\nconform to ``appropriate'' medical\nstandards. In so doing, they not only\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01488 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8869AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\nmayÐthey mustÐinspect, acquire, and\nrequire the disclosure of the records of\nprivate patients and their doc-\ntors. ...\nMr. Chairman, I am well aware of\nthe precedents of this bodyÐand I am\ncertain that my colleagues on the Ways\nand Means Committee are as wellÐ\nthat would not allow section 5(l) of\nH.R. 3 to be broader in scope than the\noriginal bill. The fact is, however, that\nsection 5(h) of the bill now before us\nclearly extends the specter of unau-\nthorized violations of patients' rights to\nconfidentiality to all patients, by all\nFederal agencies and departments.\nThere is no way for Congress to know,\nin advance, precisely who will seek to\ninspect, acquire or require the disclo-\nsure of the data and records gathered\nby a PSRO and mandated to be shared\nwith others by the original language of\nH.R. 3. Furthermore, a private pa-\ntient's medical record can be trans-\nformed into a medicare or medicaid pa-\ntient's record simply by a change in\nthe status of the patientÐhis becoming\neligible, for example, through dis-\nability, age, or poverty. The medicare\nand medicaid programs have much to\nfear if the kinds of safeguards provided\nfor in the Crane-Stark amendment are\nnot extended to all records of patients\nand all Federal officials.\nThe Crane-Stark amendment most\ncertainly relates to the fundamental\npurpose of H.R. 3, and applies only to\nthose individuals, agencies and depart-\nments that are within the scope of the\noriginal bill. To decide otherwise\nwould, I respectfully submit, signifi-\ncantly and adversely affect the very\npatients who are the intended bene-\nficiaries of this important legislation. It\nwould create potential barriers be-tween patient and doctor by inhibiting\nfree communication, since there would\nbe no guarantees that their jobs would\nbe secure or their friends and families\nwould be free from interrogation and\ninvestigation by the Federal Govern-\nment. ...\nTHECHAIRMAN : The Chair is pre-\npared to rule.\nThe gentleman from North Carolina\nmakes the point of order against the\namendment recommended by the Com-\nmittee on Ways and Means printed on\npage 66, line 22, through page 70, line\n5, on the grounds that it is not ger-\nmane to the bill H.R. 3.\nThe bill amends several titles of the\nSocial Security Act to correct fraudu-\nlent activities under the medicare and\nmedicaid programs by strengthening\npenalty sanctions, increasing disclo-\nsure of information requirements, im-\nproving the professional standards re-\nview program, and by proposing cer-\ntain administrative reforms.\nThe amendment recommended by\nthe Committee on Ways and Means,\nwhile addressing the role of profes-\nsional standards review organizations\nin permitting disclosure of confidential\nmedical records of patients under\nmedicare and medicaid programs, goes\nbeyond that issue and encompasses a\nprohibition against any officer or em-\nployee of the Federal Government from\ndisclosing any identifiable medical\nrecord absent specific authorization\nfrom the patient. As drafted, the\namendment would supersede any other\nprovision of law which would otherwise\npermit Federal officials to disclose\nmedical records, and would appear to\naffect health programs which are not\nmedicare or medicaid related which do\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01489 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8870DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n2.S. 2051 (Committee on Ways and\nMeans).\n3.90 C ONG. REC. 7465, 78th Cong. 2d\nSess., Aug. 31, 1944.4.Id. at pp. 7465, 7466.\n5.Fritz G. Lanham (Tex.).\n6.90 C ONG. REC. 7466, 78th Cong. 2d\nSess., Aug. 31, 1944.not involve PSRO participation and\nwhich are not established under the\nSocial Security Act.\nFor this reason, the Chair holds that\nthe amendment recommended by the\nCommittee on Ways and Means is not\ngermane to H.R. 3 and sustains the\npoint of order.\nBill Amending One Title of So-\ncial Security ActÐAmend-\nment to Different Title\n§35.42 To a bill to amend one\ntitle of the Social Security\nAct to provide a national\nprogram for war mobiliza-\ntion and reconversion, an\namendment offered to amend\nanother title of the act and\nrelating to military pay and\nallowances was held not ger-\nmane.\nIn the 78th Congress, during\nconsideration of the War Mobiliza-\ntion and Reconversion Bill of\n1944,(2)the following amendment\nwas offered:(3)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [H.\nJerry] Voorhis of California: On page\n39, line 24, add the following new title,\nTitle 4, section 401:\nTitle II of the Social Security Act,\nas amended, is amended by adding\nat the end thereof the following new\nsection:``MILITARY SERVICE BENEFITS\n``Sec. 210. (a) For the purposes of\nthis title, an individual who is en-\ngaged in military service within the\nperiod beginning with October 1,\n1940, and ending 1 year after the\ntermination of the emergency de-\nclared by the President on May 27,\n1941, shall be deemed to have been\npaid for each month in which he per-\nforms any military service within\nsuch period wages equal to [a speci-\nfied amount]. ...''\nA point of order was raised\nagainst the amendment, as fol-\nlows:(4)\nMR. [J ERE] C OOPER [of Tennessee]:\nMr. Chairman, I make a point of order\nagainst the amendment offered by the\ngentleman from California (Mr.\nVoorhis) that it is not germane to this\nbill or any part of it. It relates to mili-\ntary pay and allowances, which is cer-\ntainly not within the scope of anything\nin this bill. ...\n...I submit further that the gen-\ntleman's amendment is to title II of the\nSocial Security Act, which is not . ..\ndealt with in the pending bill at all.\nThe only amendment to the Social Se-\ncurity Act in this bill relates to title\nIII.\nThe Chairman,(5)adopting the\nreasoning of Mr. Cooper, sus-\ntained the point of order.(6)\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01490 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8871AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n7.H.R. 3325 (Committee on Coinage,\nWeights, and Measures).\n8.84 C ONG. REC. 4628, 76th Cong. 1st\nSess., Apr. 21, 1939.Continuing Appropriations\nand Imposing Conditions on\nAvailabilityÐAmendment To\nChange Law Governing Eligi-\nbility\n§35.43 To a proposal con-\ntinuing the availability of ap-\npropriated funds and also\nimposing diverse legislative\nconditions upon the avail-\nability of appropriations, an\namendment directly and per-\nmanently changing existing\nlaw as to the eligibility of\ncertain recipients was con-\nceded to go beyond the scope\nof the categories of legisla-\ntive changes contained there-\nin and to be nongermane.\nThe proceedings of Dec. 10,\n1981, relating to House Joint Res-\nolution 370, continuing appropria-\ntions for fiscal 1982, are discussed\nin §23.4, supra.\nBill Relating to Exchange\nValue and Gold Content of\nDollarÐAmendment Affecting\nPurchase of Foreign Gold\n§35.44 To a bill amending the\nGold Reserve Act to extend\ncertain powers of the Presi-\ndent with respect to use of\nthe stabilization fund for\npurposes of stabilizing the\nexchange value of the dollar,\nand with respect to alteringthe gold content of the dol-\nlar, an amendment was held\nto be not germane which re-\nferred to another part of the\nact and related to terms\nupon which foreign gold\ncould be purchased by the\nSecretary of the Treasury.\nIn the 76th Congress, during\nconsideration of a bill(7)as de-\nscribed above, the following\namendment was offered:(8)\nAmendment offered by Mr. August\nH. Andresen [of Minnesota]: On page\n2, at the end of section 3, add a new\nsection, as follows:\nSec. 4. That section 3700 of the\nRevised Statutes (U.S.C., title 31,\nsec. 734, as amended by section 8 of\nthe Gold Reserve Act of 1934 (73d\nCong., H.R. 6976), is further amend-\ned to read as follows:\n``Sec. 3700. With the approval of\nthe President, the Secretary of the\nTreasury may purchase gold . .. at\nhome or abroad . .. upon such\nterms . .. as he may deem most ad-\nvantageous to the public interest:\nProvided, That no payments for gold\nso purchased shall be made . .. to\nany foreign vendor (including foreign\ngovernments) . .. unless and until\nsuch vendor . .. shall guarantee to\nthe Secretary of the Treasury as a\ncondition precedent to receiving such\npayment: (1) That [a specified\namount] shall be used exclusively for\nthe purchase of commodities or arti-\ncles produced, grown, or manufac-\ntured in the United States. ...''\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01491 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8872DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n9.John W. McCormack (Mass.).\n10.84 C ONG. REC. 4629, 76th Cong. 1st\nSess., Apr. 21, 1939. 11.Id. at p. 4630.Mr. Howard W. Smith, of Vir-\nginia, made the point of order that\nthe amendment was not germane\nto the bill. He argued that, where\nonly one amendment to existing\nlaw is contained in the bill, no\nother amendments to the law can\nbe proposed by way of amendment\nof the bill; and that, where more\nthan one amendment is proposed\nin the bill, the question for the\nChair is whether the bill is a gen-\neral amendatory bill and thus\nopen to amendments further\nmodifying the law. The Chair-\nman,(9)in ruling on the point of\norder, stated:(10)\nThe bill picks out two powers grant-\ned in the Gold Reserve Act of 1934,\nfrom a number of other powers in that\nact, and it extends the date of expira-\ntion of those powers vested in the\nPresident and also in the Secretary of\nthe Treasury, and continues those pow-\ners for an additional period.\nChairman McCormack then\ncited prior instances in which, ``to\na bill amending the Federal Re-\nserve Act in a number of particu-\nlars an amendment relating to the\nFederal Reserve Act, but to no\nportion provided for in the pend-\ning bill, was held not to be ger-\nmane''; and in which it was held\nthat, ``to a bill amendatory of an\nact in several particulars anamendment proposing to modify\nthe act but not related to the bill''\nwas not germane.\nA further ruling of the Speaker\nin a prior situation was quoted, as\nfollows:(11)\nIt does not seem to the Chair that\nthis bill brings the whole National De-\nfense Act before the House. It only\nbrings before the House a very limited\nportion of it, and not the portion af-\nfected by the amendment offered by\nthe gentleman from South Carolina.\nThe Chair is disposed to sustain the\npoint of order. The point of order is\nsustained.\nThe Chair sustained the point\nof order.\nPenalties Under Export Admin-\nistration ActÐAmendment\nRelating to Different Class of\nPenalties\n§35.45 To a bill relating to the\nimposition of penalties of a\ncertain class, all falling with-\nin the jurisdiction of one\ncommittee, an amendment\nrelating to another class of\npenalties falling within the\njurisdiction of another com-\nmittee is not germane; thus,\nto a title of a bill reported\nfrom the Committee on For-\neign Affairs comprehensively\namending the Export Admin-\nistration Act, and addressing\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01492 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8873AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n12.See 114 C ONG. R EC. 3687, 90th\nCong. 2d Sess., Feb. 21, 1968.\n13.H.R. 14743 (Committee on Banking\nand Currency).\n14.James G. O'Hara (Mich.).penalties for violating export\ncontrols within that commit-\ntee's jurisdiction, such as\nrevocation of export licenses\nand forfeiture of property in-\nterests and proceeds related\nto exports, an amendment\nauthorizing the President to\ncontrol imports by persons\nviolating export controls was\nheld to be not germane be-\ncause it was a penalty not\nwithin the class covered by\nthe title and by the Export\nAdministration Act, and was\na matter within the jurisdic-\ntion of another committee\n(Ways and Means).\nThe proceedings of Sept. 29,\n1983, relating to H.R. 3231, the\nExport Administration Amend-\nments Act of 1983, are discussed\nin §4.55, supra.\nBill Affecting Gold Reserve Re-\nquirementsÐAmendment Re-\nlating to France's War Debt\nto United States\n§35.46 To a bill eliminating\nthe gold reserve require-\nments for certain United\nStates currencies, an amend-\nment providing that no re-\ndemption in gold be made to\nFrance until agreement is\nreached respecting payment\nof France's World War I debtto the United States was held\nto be not germane.\nThe following ruling(12)of the\nChair was made with respect to\nthe germaneness of an amend-\nment offered by Mr. Lester L.\nWolff, of New York, to a bill(13)\neliminating certain gold reserve\nrequirements:\nTHECHAIRMAN :(14)... The bill be-\nfore the House, H.R. 14743, deals only\nwith the question of eliminating re-\nserve requirements for Federal Reserve\nnotes and for U.S. notes and Treasury\nnotes of 1890. The amendment offered\nby the gentleman from New York,\nwhile put in the form of an amend-\nment to the same section of the Gold\nReserve Act amended by section 8 of\nthe bill before the Committee, has to\ndo with war debts, a matter within the\njurisdiction of the Committee on Ways\nand Means and a matter not involved\nin the subject before the Committee of\nthe Whole.\nThe Chair, therefore, sustains the\npoint of order.\nContributions to International\nFinancial OrganizationÐRe-\nstriction on Uses of Funds\n§35.47 To a bill continuing au-\nthority under existing law to\nmake contributions to an\ninternational financial orga-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01493 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8874DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n15.120 C ONG. REC. 22026, 22028, 93d\nCong. 2d Sess. 16.John Brademas (Ind.).nization and authorizing ap-\npropriations for those con-\ntributions, an amendment\nadding a further restriction\non the use of United States\ncontributions to those al-\nready contained in that law\nis germane.\nOn July 2, 1974,(15)during con-\nsideration of a bill continuing\nUnited States participation under\nthe International Development\nAssociation Act (H.R. 15465), an\namendment prohibiting the use of\nUnited States contributions as\nloans for the purchase of nuclear\nweapons or materials was held\ngermane as a restriction on the\nuse of loans by recipient nations\nwhich added to several restric-\ntions already contained in the Act:\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nBe it enacted by the Senate and\nHouse of Representatives of the\nUnited States of America in Congress\nassembled, That the International\nDevelopment Association Act (22\nU.S.C. 284 et seq.) is amended by\nadding at the end thereof the fol-\nlowing new section:\nSec. 14. (a) The United States Gov-\nernor is hereby authorized to agree\non behalf of the United States to pay\nto the Association four annual in-\nstallments of $375,000,000 each as\nthe United States contribution to the\nFourth Replenishment of the Re-\nsources of the Association.\n``(b) In order to pay for the United\nStates contribution, there is herebyauthorized to be appropriated with-\nout fiscal year limitation four annual\ninstallments of $375,000,000 each for\npayment by the Secretary of the\nTreasury.''.\nTHECHAIRMAN :(16)Are there any\namendments to this section? There\nbeing no amendments the Clerk will\nread.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nSec. 2. Subsections 3 (b) and (c) of\nPublic Law 93±110 (87 Stat. 352) are\nrepealed and in lieu thereof add the\nfollowing:\n``(b) No rule, regulation, or order in\neffect on the date subsections (a) and\n(b) become effective may be con-\nstrued to prohibit any person from\npurchasing, holding, selling, or oth-\nerwise dealing with gold in the\nUnited States or abroad. ...\nMR. [M ARIO ] BIAGGI [of New York]:\nMr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Biaggi:\nPage 2, immediately after line 9, in-\nsert the following new section:\nSec. 2. The International Develop-\nment Association Act (22 U.S.C. 284\net seq.) is amended by adding at the\nend thereof the following new sec-\ntion:\n``Sec. 15. No moneys contributed\nby the United States to the Associa-\ntion may be loaned to, or utilized by,\nany country for the purpose of pur-\nchasing nuclear materials, or nuclear\nenergy technology or for the purpose\nof developing nuclear explosive de-\nvices or nuclear weapons.''. ..\nMR. [H ENRY S.] R EUSS [of Wis-\nconsin]: Mr. Chairman, I make the\npoint of order against the amendment\nthat it is not germane. It purports to\namend subsections 3 (b) and (c) of Pub-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01494 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8875AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n17.In response to a further point of\norder, the Chair ruled that the\nBiaggi amendment came too late, be-\ncause section 2 of the bill had al-\nready been read.lic Law 93±110 (87 Stat. 352). Public\nLaw 93±110 is the Par Value Act\nwhich affected the gold value of the\ndollar. The amendment offered by the\ngentleman from New York (Mr. Biaggi)\nattempts to amend the International\nDevelopment Association Act, this has\nto do with nuclear materials, it is,\ntherefore, entirely nongermane to the\nact which it seeks to amend. ...\nMR. BIAGGI : ... Mr. Chairman, my\namendment simply seeks to add a new\nsection to this bill, section 15. This sec-\ntion would condition any of the moneys\nto be spent in the event IDA is success-\nful this afternoon, or any of the mon-\neys to be loaned, and I use that as a\neuphemism because, in fact, it is an\noutright grant in its nature, and we\nhave recognized it as such, and I do\nnot think anyone thinks that we will\never have the money returned, but it\nrepresents a condition under which the\nmoney can be loaned.\nThe fact of the matter is, the money,\nif it is to be loaned, cannot be used to\nprovide nuclear technology or nuclear\nmaterial in any of the proposed coun-\ntries, and it is my judgment that the\nappropriate manner in which to do\nthat is to add an additional section,\nand we do that in my amendment by\ncreating section 15.\nTHECHAIRMAN : The Chair is pre-\npared to rule on the point of order\nraised by the gentleman from Wis-\nconsin (Mr. Reuss).\nThe bill is drafted as a continuation\nof the U.S. Governor's authority to\nagree to make U.S. money available to\nIDA under terms of the International\nDevelopment Association Act. That\nstatute already contains several re-\nstrictions on the Governor's authorityto cast dissenting votes for loans to na-\ntions lacking certain qualifications.\nTherefore an amendment to further re-\nstrict the use of funds for loans under\nIDA, part of which are authorized by\nthe bill, would be germane, and the\npoint of order is overruled.(17)\nExtending Authorization for\nContributions to Inter-\nnational Monetary FundÐ\nAmendment Restricting Total\nBudget Outlays of Govern-\nment\n§35.48 An amendment must be\ngermane to the pending bill,\nand where the bill amends\none portion of an existing\nlaw, an amendment that af-\nfects another provision of\nthat law, not related to the\nsubject of the bill, is not ger-\nmane; thus, to a title of a bill\namending that portion of an\nexisting law to extend the\nauthorization for United\nStates contributions to the\nInternational Monetary\nFund, amendments affecting\nanother section of that law\nby mandating, or affirming\ncongressional commitment to\nmandate, that the total budg-\net outlays of the federal gov-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01495 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8876DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n18.International Recovery and Financial\nStability Act.\n19.129 C ONG. REC. 22678, 22679, 98th\nCong. 1st Sess.ernment shall not exceed its\nreceipts were held not ger-\nmane, as addressing issues of\nfederal spending and rev-\nenue beyond the scope of the\ntitle and amending or ref-\nerencing a section originally\nadded to the law as a non-\ngermane Senate amendment.\nDuring consideration of H.R.\n2957(18)in the Committee of the\nWhole on Aug. 3, 1983,(19)the\nChair sustained points of order in\nthe circumstances described\nabove. The proceedings were as\nfollows:\nMR. [R OBERT S.] W ALKER [of Penn-\nsylvania]: Mr. Chairman, I offer an\namendment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Walk-\ner: On page 28, after line 8, add the\nfollowing:\nSec. 308. Consistent with the ob-\njective of sustaining worldwide eco-\nnomic growth and recovery set forth\nin this title, section 3 of Public Law\n96±389, the Bretton Woods Agree-\nments Act Amendments of 1980, is\namended by striking it in its entirety\nand inserting in lieu thereof the fol-\nlowing: Beginning in fiscal year\n1985, the total budget outlays of the\nFederal Government shall not exceed\nits receipts. ...\nMR. [F ERNAND J.] S TGERMAIN [of\nRhode Island]: Mr. Chairman, I make\na point of order against the amend-\nment. ...[M]y point of order is that it relates\nto a balanced budget for the United\nStates and is therefore not germane to\nthat part of the legislation before us.\nTitle III of the legislation provides\nfor U.S. contributions to the IMF, as\nwell as certain conditions and restric-\ntions of those contributions and on\nlending by U.S. banks. The title does\nnot address the far broader issues of\noverall Federal Government spending\nand taxing raised by this amendment.\nThe amendment also has a different\nfundamental purpose from title III, in\nthat it seeks to impose limitations on\naggregate receipts and expenditures of\nthe Federal Government, which has\nnothing to do with the purposes of the\nIMF legislation.\nThe mere fact that previous non-\ngermane amendments dealing with\nbudget outlays and receipts have been\nattached to IMF legislation in past\nCongresses does not make the amend-\nment germane. The amendment must\nbe germane to the bill, not to the un-\nderlying law being amended in the bill.\nDeschler's Procedure, chapter 28,\nsection 27.\nI ask the Chair to rule the amend-\nment out of order. ...\nMR. W ALKER : Mr. Chairman, the\namendment that I have placed before\nthe House relates precisely to the law\nto which this particular piece of legis-\nlation speaks. And let me also cite\nDeschler's Procedure. Deschler's Proce-\ndure, 28.55, says that a bill amending\nseveral sections of an existing law may\nbe sufficiently comprehensive to permit\namendments which are germane to\nother sections of that law.\nThat is precisely what I am doing\nhere. The language of this amendment\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01496 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8877AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n20.Donald J. Pease (Ohio).relates to balanced budget language\nthat is in the present law. This bill\namends several sections of that law.\nSo, therefore, this particular amend-\nment is entirely germane to that which\nis before us.\nDeschler's Procedure also says, in\nsection 28.57, to a bill amending a law\ndealing with several subjects within a\ndefinable class, an amendment further\namending that law to add another sub-\nject within the same class is germane.\nThis again is the same subject area.\nWe have balanced budget language\nwhich exists in the present law. This is\nin the same class. So, therefore, it\nseems to me that under precedents of\nthe House it is entirely germane to the\nbill that we are considering.\nTHECHAIRMAN :(20)The Chair is pre-\npared to rule on the point of order.\nAlthough the balanced budget provi-\nsion of law which would be amended\nby this amendment was originally\nadded to the Bretton Woods Agreement\nAct as a nongermane Senate amend-\nment in the 95th Congress and was\nsubsequently amended in a similar bill\nin the 96th Congress, the pending bill\ndoes not relate to the entire Federal\nbudget.\nThe Chair rules that the amendment\nmust be germane to the pending bill, it\nnot being sufficient that the amend-\nment relate to a nongermane provision\nof a law being amended by the pending\nbill.\nTherefore, the Chair sustains the\npoint of order.\nMr. Walker then offered a fur-\nther amendment:\nMR. W ALKER : Mr. Chairman, I offer\nan amendment.The Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Walk-\ner: On page 28, after line 8, add the\nfollowing:\nSec. 308. Consistent with the ob-\njective of sustaining worldwide eco-\nnomic growth and recovery set forth\nin this title, Congress reaffirms its\ncommitment to the mandates re-\nquired under section 7 of Public Law\n95±435, the Bretton Woods Agree-\nments Act Amendments of\n1978. ...\nMR. STGERMAIN : Mr. Chairman, I\nraise a point of order against the\namendment. ...\n[T]he amendment relates to a bal-\nanced budget for the United States and\nis therefore not germane to that part of\nthe legislation before us. Title III of\nthe legislation provides for U.S. con-\ntributions to the IMF, as well as cer-\ntain conditions and restrictions on\nthose contributions and on lending by\nU.S. banks. The title does not address\nthe far broader issues of overall Fed-\neral Government spending and taxing\nraised by this amendment.\nThe amendment also has a different\nfundamental purpose from title III, in\nthat it seeks to impose limitations on\naggregate receipts and expenditures of\nthe Federal Government, which has\nnothing to do with the purposes of the\nIMF legislation.\nThe mere fact that previous non-\ngermane amendments dealing with\nbudget outlays and receipts have been\nattached to IMF legislation in past\nCongresses does not make this amend-\nment germane. The amendment must\nbe germane to the bill, not to the un-\nderlying law being amended in the bill.\nDeschler's, chapter 28, section 27.\nI ask the Chair to rule the amend-\nment out of order. ...\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01497 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8878DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n1.H.R. 6778 (Committee on Banking\nand Currency).\n2.115 C ONG. R EC. 33141, 91st Cong.\n1st Sess., Nov. 5, 1969.\n3.Id. at p. 33142.MR. W ALKER : Mr. Chairman, in the\ncase of this amendment, it does two\nthings. No. 1, it speaks to exactly the\nsame kinds of issues that were in-\nvolved in amendment language that\nwas added in the committee to the bill\ndealing with apartheid. This particular\nlanguage simply says that consistent\nwith the objectives sustaining world-\nwide economic growth and recovery set\nforth in the titleÐso it relates directly\nto the title of the bill under consider-\nation. We are reaffirming the process\nof the law that was previously decided\nby this Congress. This simply reaffirms\nsection 7 of Public Law 95-435 which\nalready exists. This is a different\namendment from the previous one. The\nprecedent cited by the gentlemanÐI\ncould agree with the ChairÐapplied to\nthe previous amendment. In this case,\nthough, the amendment language is\nspecifically consistent with the title\nunder consideration, and I think that\nthe amendment is entirely germane to\nthe bill that we are considering.\nTHECHAIRMAN : The Chair rules that\nthe issues raised with this amendment\nare fundamentally the same as those\nraised by the previous amendment.\nThe issues are not germane to the bill\nat hand, and the point of order is sus-\ntained.\nBill and Amendment Affecting\nDefinitions of Terms in Bank\nHolding Company Act\n§35.49 To a bill amending two\nsections of the Bank Holding\nCompany Act to, first, rede-\nfine ``bank holding company''\nto include companies having\nactual control of any bankand, second, exempt from the\ndefinition of such term cer-\ntain institutions controlling\nbanks engaged primarily in\nforeign business, an amend-\nment to a third section of the\nact to change the definition\nof the word ``company'' to in-\nclude partnerships was held\nto be germane.\nIn the 91st Congress, a bill(1)\nwas under consideration amend-\ning the Bank Holding Company\nAct of 1956. During consideration\nof the bill, an amendment had\nbeen offered as follows,(2)and sub-\nsequently adopted: G5(3)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [Thomas\nL.] Ashley [of Ohio]: Page 12, strike\nlines 18 through 21 and insert in lieu\nthereof the following:\n(b) Section 2(a) of the Bank Hold-\ning Company Act of 1956 is amended\nto read as follows:\n``Sec. 2. (a)(1) Except as provided\nin paragraph (5) of this subsection,\n`bank holding company' means any\ncompany that has control over any\nbank or over any company that is or\nbecomes a bank holding company by\nvirtue of this Act.\n``(2) Any given person has control.\n``(A) over any company which is a\ncorporation if the person . .. has\npower to vote 25 percent or more of\nany class of voting securities of that\ncorporation.\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01498 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8879AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n4.Id. at p. 33141. 5.Id. at p. 33142.``(B) over any company which is a\ncorporation or trust if the person\ncontrols in any manner the election\nof a majority of its directors or trust-\nees. ...''\n(c) Section 4(c) of the Bank Hold-\ning Company Act of 1956 is amended\nby adding at the end thereof the fol-\nlowing new paragraph:\n``(12) . .. activities conducted by\nany company organized under the\nlaws of a foreign country the greater\npart of whose business is conducted\noutside the United States, if the\nBoard . .. determines that . .. the\nexemption would not be substan-\ntially at variance with the purposes\nof this Act. ...''\nIn explaining the amendment,\nthe proponent had stated:(4)\nMr. Chairman, this amendment is\nconcerned with the criteria for deter-\nmining whether or not a company is a\nbank holding company for purposes of\nthe 1956 act, as amended. The bill be-\nfore us, H.R. 6778, defines a bank\nholding company as any company that\ndirectly or indirectly owns or controls\n25 percent or more of the voting shares\nof any bank. ...\nTestimony before our committee in-\ndicated that in some instances compa-\nnies might seek to avoid coverage of\nthe act by keeping their stock owner-\nship at less than 25 percent. My\namendment simply modifies H.R. 6778\nby providing that actual control of any\nbank, even at less than 25 percent, is\nsufficient to require the controlling\ncompany to register as a bank holding\ncompany. ...\nSecond, Mr. Chairman, my amend-\nment makes it clear, subject to action\nby the Federal Reserve Board, that noforeign institution will be a bank hold-\ning company by virtue of its ownership\nor control of any bank the greater part\nof whose business is conducted outside\nthe United States. ...\nAfter adoption of the Ashley\namendment, the following amend-\nment was offered to the bill:(5)\nAmendment offered by Mr.\n[Chalmers P.] Wylie [of Ohio]: Page 12,\nimmediately after line 21, insert the\nfollowing:\n(c) Section 2(b) of the Bank Hold-\ning Company Act of 1956 is amended\n(A) by inserting ``partnership,'' imme-\ndiately after ``corporation,'', (B) by\nstriking ``(1)'', and (C) by striking\n``, or (2) any partnership''. ...\nA point of order was raised\nagainst the amendment, as fol-\nlows:\nMR. [T HOMAS M.] R EES [of Cali-\nfornia]: Mr. Chairman, the amendment\nis out of order as it is not germane to\nthe bill now before us. The bill before\nus is in the form of one committee\namendment. The committee amend-\nment deals with section 2(a) of the\nBank Holding Company Act. It then on\nline 22 proceeds to jump to section 4(c)\nof the Bank Holding Act. The amend-\nment offered by the gentleman from\nOhio goes to 2(b) and there is no men-\ntion in the bill before us of section 2(b)\nof the Bank Holding Company Act.\nIn defense of the amendment,\nthe proponent stated as follows:\nMR. W YLIE: Mr. Chairman, the prin-\nciple is well established that in passing\non the germaneness of an amendment,\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01499 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8880DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n6.Chet Holifield (Calif.).the Chair considers the relationship of\nthe amendment to the bill as modified\nby the Committee of the Whole at the\ntime the amendment is offered, and\nnot as originally referred to the com-\nmitteeÐCannon's Procedure, page 200.\nMr. Chairman, in the light of this\nprinciple, the attention of the Chair is\nrespectfully directed to the present sta-\ntus of the committee amendment,\nwhich under the rule is considered as\nan original bill for the purpose of\namendment. The Committee of the\nWhole has adopted, among others, the\nAshley amendment, which completely\nrewrites the definition of ``bank holding\ncompany'' in the Bank Holding Com-\npany Act.\nIt is obvious that the legal signifi-\ncance of the definition of ``bank holding\ncompany'' depends in turn on the defi-\nnition of ``company.'' It is equally obvi-\nous that a change in the definition of\n``company'' will, to that extent, modify\nthe definition of ``bank holding com-\npany.''\nMy amendment, Mr. Chairman,\namends the definition of ``company'' so\nas to include partnerships. I think it is\nclear, Mr. Chairman, that my amend-\nment thereby modifies the definition of\n``bank holding company''Ðindeed, Mr.\nChairman, this is its principal purpose.\nBy adopting the Ashley amendment,\nthe Committee of the Whole nec-\nessarily made in order any amendment\nproposing a germane modification of\nthe bill as so amended, in accord with\nthe principle which I stated at the be-\nginning of my remarks. ...\nThe Chairman,(6)in ruling on\nthe point of order, stated:...The fact that there was no\npoint of order raised to the Ashley\namendment allowed the Ashley amend-\nment to be considered and adopted by\nthe committee and that changed the\ntenor of the bill to the extent that the\nlanguage therein be changed, and the\ncommittee amendment now under con-\nsideration amends sections 2(a) and\n4(c) of the act. These two sections, and\nthe amendment proposed to them, are\nunrelated. The committee report on the\npending bill discloses that the com-\nmittee amendment does two things:\nSubjects single bank holding compa-\nnies to the 1956 act and changes the\nexisting law with respect to what par-\nticular nonbanking activities are pro-\nhibited to them.\nIt is a well-established principle of\nthe germaneness rule that where a bill\namends existing law in two or more\nunrelated respects, other amendments\nto that law may be germane. ...\nSection 2(b) of existing law . . . de-\nfines the word ``company'' as it is used\nin the term ``bank holding company''\nand elsewhere in the act. ...\nSince the committee amendment\namends two provisions of existing law\nand opened up for consideration the\nmeaning of the term ``bank holding\ncompany,'' . . . words within or depend-\nent upon that term, even if defined\nelsewhere in the act, are also subject to\ninterpretation and definition.\nThe Chair holds the amendment ger-\nmane and overrules the point of order.\nBill Amending Federal Reserve\nActÐAmendment To Permit\nNational Banks To Purchase\nCertain Banks Under An-\nother Law\n§35.50 To a bill amending an\nexisting law to accomplish a\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01500 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8881AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n7.The Monetary Control Act of 1979.\n8.125 C ONG. R EC. 19673, 19674,\n19688±90, 96th Cong. 1st Sess.particular purpose, an\namendment to another law\nnot related to the same sub-\nject is not germane; thus, to\na bill amending several sec-\ntions of the Federal Reserve\nAct to expand the authority\nof the Federal Reserve Board\nto manage the national mon-\netary supply by providing\nmandatory reserve require-\nments and by imposing other\nrequirements on member\nbanks, an amendment to an-\nother law to permit national\nbanks to purchase small\nbanker-owned banks was\nconceded to be nongermane\nsince unrelated to the Fed-\neral Reserve Act.\nDuring consideration of H.R.\n7(7)in the Committee of the\nWhole on July 20, 1979,(8)a point\nof order was conceded and sus-\ntained against the amendment de-\nscribed above. The proceedings\nwere as follows:\nSec. 3. (a) Section 19(a) of the Fed-\neral Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 461) is\namended (1) by changing ``member\nbank'' to read ``depository institu-\ntion'' each place it appears therein,\nand (2) by adding at the end thereof\nthe following: ``The Board shall exer-\ncise its authority to define the term\n`deposit' when applicable to reserve\nrequirements of nonmember deposi-tory institutions after consultation\nwith the Board of Directors of the\nFederal Deposit Insurance Corpora-\ntion, the Federal Home Loan Bank\nBoard, and the National Credit\nUnion Administration.''. ..\nMR. [J AMES A.] M ATTOX [of Texas]:\nMr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr.\nMattox: Add a new section:\nSec. 8. Section 5136 of the Revised\nStatutes (12 U.S.C. 24(7)) is amend-\ned by inserting before the period at\nthe end thereof the following: ``: Pro-\nvided further, That, notwithstanding\nany other provision of this para-\ngraph, the association may purchase\nfor its own account shares of stock of\na bank insured by the Federal De-\nposit Insurance Corporation if the\nstock of such bank is owned exclu-\nsively by other banks and if such\nbank is engaged exclusively in pro-\nviding banking services for other\nbanks and their officers, directors, or\nemployees, but in no event shall the\ntotal amount of such stock held by\nthe association exceed at any time 10\nper centum of its capital stock and\npaid in and unimpaired surplus, and\nin no event shall the purchase of\nsuch stock result in the association's\nacquiring more than 5 per centum of\nany class of voting securities of such\nbank''. ...\nMR. [C HALMERS P.] W YLIE [of Ohio]:\n... The amendment is clearly not ger-\nmane to this bill. I might say I have\nsome sympathy with the gentleman's\namendment, but it is a rather com-\nplicated amendment which ought to be\ndebated more fully than we have time\nhere today to do, in my judgment. This\nbill we have before us today is a bill to\nfacilitate the implementation of mone-\ntary policy and to promote competitive\nequality among depository institutions.\nThe gentleman's amendment would\nestablish a new bank. It would estab-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01501 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8882DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n9.John P. Murtha (Pa.).\n10.120 C ONG. REC. 2064±66, 93d Cong.\n2d Sess.lish a whole new concept and it is obvi-\nously not within the purview of the bill\nbefore us today.\nTHE CHAIRMAN :(9)Does the gen-\ntleman wish to be heard against the\npoint of order?\nMR. M ATTOX : Mr. Chairman, I con-\ncede the point of order.\nTHECHAIRMAN : The gentleman con-\ncedes the point of order.\nThe point of order is sustained.\nDeposit Insurance CoverageÐ\nAmendment Imposing Max-\nimum Interest and Dividend\nRates Payable\n§35.51 To a proposition to\namend existing law in one\nparticular, an amendment to\nfurther change that law in\nanother respect not covered\nby the bill is not germane;\nthus, to a bill limited in\nscope to the amount and ex-\ntent of deposit insurance\ncoverage in various savings\ninstitutions, an amendment\nimposing uniform maximum\ninterest or dividend rates\nwhich may be paid by those\nsavings institutions was held\nnot germane.\nOn Feb. 5, 1974,(10)during con-\nsideration of H.R. 11221 (amend-\ning the Federal Deposit Insurance\nAct) in the Committee of theWhole, the Chair sustained a\npoint of order against the fol-\nlowing amendment:\nMR. [A LBERT W.] J OHNSON of Penn-\nsylvania: Mr. Chairman, I offer amend-\nments.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendments offered by Mr. John-\nson of Pennsylvania: On page 3,\nstrike the quotation mark at the end\nof line 17, and insert the following\nafter line 17:\n``(C) In order to provide for the\nequality of interest or dividend rates,\nterms and conditions on deposits or\ninvestments in insured banks or in-\nsured institutions made by any de-\npositor referred to in subparagraph\n(A) of this paragraph, the Corpora-\ntion, the Board of Governors of the\nFederal Reserve System, and the\nFederal Home Loan Bank Board,\nshall, in the event that limitations\non interest or dividend rates are im-\nposed on such deposits or invest-\nments, issue uniform regulations\nspecifying maximum interest or divi-\ndend rates which may be paid on\nsuch deposits or investments made\nunder the same terms and condi-\ntions.''. ..\nMR. [F ERNAND J.] S TGERMAIN [of\nRhode Island]: . .. Mr. Chairman, I\nmake a point of order against the so-\ncalled Johnson amendment to H.R.\n11221.\nThis section merely provides full\nFederal insurance on such funds\nplaced in financial institutions, and re-\nstricts itself to that.\nThe amendment before us speaks to\nthe question of what interest rates\nmay be offered to such funds and,\ntherefore, is not germane since it is be-\nyond the scope of the legislation con-\ntained in H.R. 11221, as well as this\nparticular section.\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01502 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8883AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n11.Spark Matsunaga (Hi.).MR. JOHNSON of Pennsylvania: . ..\nMr. Chairman, I rise to defend the\namendment against the point of order\nraised by the gentleman from Rhode\nIsland. The amendment is indeed ger-\nmane to the fundamental purpose of\nthe bill before us today. On its face,\nthe bill provides full insurance of the\ndeposits of public units in all insured\nbanks and institutions. As such, it is\ndesigned and intended to make a basic\nchange in the relationships between\nthe financial institutions which are\nregulated by the Federal Reserve, the\nFederal Deposit Insurance Corpora-\ntion, and the Federal Home Loan Bank\nBoardÐthe intention is to redistribute\nthe deposits among these institutions.\nIn the bill, the primary method for\nachieving this redistribution is through\nthe provision of insurance. Whereas,\npublic deposits are presently limited\nfor all practical purposes to commercial\nbanks, which can supplement their ac-\ncount insurance with the protection af-\nforded by the pledging of collateral to\nsecure these public depositsÐand this\npledging is required in most instances\nby State lawÐthe thrust of the pend-\ning legislation is to enable thrift insti-\ntutions, savings and loan associations,\nand mutual savings banks in par-\nticular, to accept these public deposits.\nMy amendment would only serve to\nmodify these terms and conditions\nunder which the deposits of public\nfunds would be accepted by the finan-\ncial institutions involved. The same\nfundamental purpose would be sought\nby amendment as by the bill itself,\nthat of regulating the flow of public\nfunds between these institutions. ...\nIt is claimed that the difference in\nterms on its face makes my amend-\nment nongermane, since the bill dealswith insurance of deposits, and my\namendment deals with the interest or\ndividends payable on those deposits.\nHowever, I must insist that the pur-\npose and thrust be examined, rather\nthan just the language.\nThe reason for extending full insur-\nance of these deposits is to influence\nthe custodians of these public funds in\ntheir decisions as to where they will be\ndepositedÐthat is the stated purpose\nof this bill, as reported by the Banking\nand Currency Committee and as dis-\ncussed here on the House floor today.\nIn no way does my amendment de-\npart from this same fundamental pur-\nposeÐit seeks to use the powers of the\nsame regulatory agencies to influence\nthe same deposits of the same public\ndepositors in the same institu-\ntions. ...\nTHECHAIRMAN :(11)The Chair is pre-\npared to rule.\nThe gentleman from Rhode Island\n(Mr. St Germain) makes the point of\norder that the amendment offered by\nthe gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr.\nJohnson) is not germane to the bill\nH.R. 11221. . . .\nThe pending bill provides for full de-\nposit insurance coverage for deposits of\npublic funds in various types of sav-\nings institutions without regard to the\nexisting $20,000 ceiling, and provides\nfor an increase in the present $20,000\nceiling on deposit insurance for indi-\nvidual accounts to $50,000. The bill is\nthus limited in scope to the question of\namount and extent of deposit insur-\nance.\nThe proposed amendment provides\nthat in order to assure equality of in-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01503 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8884DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n12.121 C ONG. R EC. 8911, 8912, 8931,\n94th Cong. 1st Sess.\n13.The Tax Reduction Act of 1975.terest or dividend rates, terms and\nconditions in the savings institutions\ncovered by the bill, the regulatory au-\nthorities of those institutions must\nissue uniform regulations, specifying\nmaximum interest or dividend rates\nwhich may be paid on deposits or in-\nvestments made under the same terms\nand conditions.\nOn September 8, 1966, Chairman\nBoland, the gentleman from Massachu-\nsetts, held that to a substitute amend-\nment amending several banking acts\nrelating to interest rates, and amend-\ning one subsection of the Federal De-\nposit Insurance Act, an amendment\nproposing further modifications to the\nlatter act to increase the insurance\ncoverage on deposits was not germane.\nIn that case, the Chair, citing ``Can-\nnon's Precedents'' (VIII, 2937), stated\nthat where it is proposed to amend ex-\nisting law in one particular, an amend-\nment to amend the law in another re-\nspect not covered by the bill is not ger-\nmane.\nAccordingly, the Chair is constrained\nto sustain the point of order.\nBill Amending Internal Rev-\nenue Code To Provide Tax\nCreditsÐSenate Amendment\nAuthorizing Payments to So-\ncial Security Recipients\n§35.52 To a House bill con-\ntaining several diverse\namendments to the Internal\nRevenue Code to provide in-\ndividual and business tax\ncredits, that part of a Senate\namendment in the nature of\na substitute contained in aconference report which au-\nthorized appropriations for\nspecial payments to social se-\ncurity recipients was deemed\nnot to be related to tax ben-\nefit provisions in the Inter-\nnal Revenue Code and was\nheld to be not germane.\nOn Mar. 26, 1975,(12)during\nconsideration of the conference re-\nport on H.R. 2166,(13)it was held\nthat to a proposition seeking to re-\nduce tax liabilities of individuals\nand businesses by providing di-\nverse tax credits within the Inter-\nnal Revenue Code, an amendment\nto provide rebates to recipients\nunder retirement and survivor\nbenefit programs was not ger-\nmane. The proceedings were as\nfollows:\nSEC. 702. S PECIAL PAYMENT TO RECIPI -\nENTS OF BENEFITS UNDER CERTAIN\nRETIREMENT AND SURVIVOR BENEFIT\nPROGRAMS .\n(a) P AYMENT .ÐThe Secretary of the\nTreasury shall, at the earliest prac-\nticable date after the enactment of this\nAct, make a $50 payment to each indi-\nvidual, who for the month of March,\n1975, was entitled . . . toÐ\n(1) a monthly insurance benefit pay-\nable under title II of the Social Secu-\nrity Act,\n(2) a monthly annuity or pension\npayment under the Railroad Retire-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01504 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8885AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n14.Carl Albert (Okla.).ment Act of 1935, the Railroad Retire-\nment Act of 1937, or the Railroad Re-\ntirement Act of 1974, or\n(3) a benefit under the supplemental\nsecurity income benefits program es-\ntablished by title XVI of the Social Se-\ncurity Act; . . .\n(c) C OORDINATION WITHOTHER FED-\nERAL PROGRAMS .ÐAny payment made\nby the Secretary of the Treasury under\nthis section to any individual shall not\nbe regarded as income (or, in the cal-\nendar year 1975, as a resource) of such\nindividual (or of the family of which he\nis a member) for purposes of any Fed-\neral or State program which under-\ntakes to furnish aid or assistance to in-\ndividuals or families, where eligibility\nto receive such aid or assistance (or the\namount of such aid or assistance)\nunder such program is based on the\nneed therefor of the individual or fam-\nily involved. . . .\nMR. [B ARBER B.] C ONABLE [Jr., of\nNew York]: I make a point of order\nagainst the conference report on the\nground that it contains matter which is\nin violation of clause 7, rule XVI.\nThe nongermane matter I am specifi-\ncally referring to is that section of the\nreport dealing with a rebate to social\nsecurity recipients. This section ap-\npears as section 702 of the conference\nreport on page 55. ...\nThere is clearly nothing in the House\nbill dealing with social security mat-\nters. There is nothing relating to a\ntrust fund or the relationship of trust\nfund and general fund.\nFor that reason, Mr. Speaker, it\nseems to me that this . .. is clearly\noutside the scope of the House bill.\n...\nMR. [A L] ULLMAN [of Oregon]: . . . In\nthe House-passed bill there was a pro-vision very specifically rebating funds\nto individuals under title I. The meas-\nure included in this conference report\ndoes not affect the trust fund in any\nway. It does not in any way amend the\nSocial Security Code.\nIn the statement of the managers we\nsay the following:\nThe conferees emphasize that\nthese payments are not Social Secu-\nrity benefits in any sense, but are in-\ntended to provide to the aged, blind,\nand disabled a payment comparable\nin nature to the tax rebate which the\nbill provides to those who are work-\ning.\nTherefore, in a broadly based bill\nsuch as this kind, where various kinds\nof rebates are passed along to different\nsegments of the public, it seems to me\nthat this is perfectly within the scope\nof the bill and should be determined\ngermane to the bill. . . .\nTHESPEAKER :(14)The Chair is pre-\npared to rule.\nTitle V of the Senate amendment in\nthe nature of a substitute ``Miscella-\nneous Provisions'' contained sections\nwhich did not amend the Internal Rev-\nenue Code and which could not be con-\nsidered germane to any portion of the\nHouse-passed bill or the bill as a\nwhole. Specifically, section 501 of the\nSenate amendment providing a special\npayment to recipients of benefits under\ncertain retirement and survivor benefit\nprograms, a modification of which was\nincorporated into section 702 of the\nconference report, is not germane to\nthe House-passed bill. That provision\nis not related to the Internal Revenue\nCode and would provide an authoriza-\ntion of appropriations from the Treas-\nury.\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01505 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8886DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n15.121 C ONG. R EC. 8911, 8933, 94th\nCong. 1st Sess.\n16.The Tax Reduction Act of 1975.For this reason, the Chair holds that\nthe section 702 of the conference report\nis not germane to the House bill and\nsustains the point of order.\nMR. CONABLE : Mr. Speaker, I move\nthe House reject the nongermane\namendment covered by my point of\norder.\nTHESPEAKER : The gentleman from\nNew York is recognized for 20 minutes\nin support of his motion.\nÐSenate Amendment Pro-\nviding Unemployment Com-\npensation Benefits\n§35.53 To a House bill amend-\ning diverse portions of the\nInternal Revenue Code to\nprovide individual and busi-\nness tax credits, a portion of\na Senate amendment in the\nnature of a substitute con-\ntained in a conference report\nproviding certain unemploy-\nment compensation bene-\nfitsÐa matter not within the\nclass of tax benefits con-\ntained in the House billÐwas\nconceded to be not germane.\nOn Mar. 26, 1975,(15)during\nconsideration of the conference re-\nport on H.R. 2166,(16)a point of\norder against a Senate matter in\nthe report was conceded and heldto be not germane. The pro-\nceedings were as indicated below:\nTITLE VIIÐMISCELLANEOUS\nPROVISIONS\nSec. 701. Certain Unemployment Com-\npensation.\n(a) A MENDMENT OF EMERGENCY UN-\nEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT OF\n1974.ÐSection 102(e) of the Emer-\ngency Unemployment Compensation\nAct of 1974 is amendedÐ\n(1) in paragraph (2) thereof, by strik-\ning out ``The amount'' and inserting in\nlieu thereof ``Except as provided in\nparagraph (3), the amount''; and\n(2) by adding at the end thereof the\nfollowing new paragraph:\n``(3) Effective only with respect to\nbenefits for weeks of unemployment\nending before July 1, 1975, the amount\nestablished in such account for any in-\ndividual shall be equal to the lesser\nofÐ\n``(A) 100 per centum of the total\namount of regular compensation (in-\ncluding the dependents'' allowances)\npayable to him with respect to the ben-\nefit year (as determined under the\nState law) on the basis of which he\nmost recently received regular com-\npensation; or\n``(B) twenty-six times his average\nweekly benefit amount (as determined\nfor purposes of section 202(b)(i)(C) of\nthe Federal-State Extended Unemploy-\nment Compensation Act of 1970) for\nhis benefit year.''\n(b) M ODIFICATION OFAGREEMENTS .Ð\nThe Secretary of Labor shall, at the\nearliest practicable date after the en-\nactment of this Act, propose to each\nState with which he has in effect an\nagreement entered into pursuant to\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01506 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8887AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n17.Carl Albert (Okla.).18.121 C ONG. R EC. 8909, 8915, 8933,\n8934, 94th Cong. 1st Sess. Under\nconsideration was the conference re-\nport on H.R. 2166.section 102 of the Emergency Unem-\nployment Compensation Act of 1974 a\nmodification of such agreement de-\nsigned to cause payments of emergency\ncompensation thereunder to be made\nin the manner prescribed by such Act,\nas amended by subsection (a) of this\nsection. . . .\nMR. [B ILL] FRENZEL [of Minnesota]:\nMr. Speaker, I make a point of order\nagainst the conference report on the\nground that it contains matter which is\nin violation of the provisions of clause\n7 of rule XVI. The nongermane matter\nthat I am specifically referring to is\nthat section of the report dealing with\nsection 701, providing certain unem-\nployment compensation benefits. . . .\nI have looked over the House bill,\nand I can find no reference therein to\nunemployment compensation benefits.\nAs nearly as I can figure it, this par-\nticular section came from a Senate\nnongermane amendment and has no\nrelation whatsoever to anything that\nwas contained in the House bill.\nI, therefore, say the point of order\nshould be sustained.\nTHE SPEAKER :(17)Does the gen-\ntleman from Oregon desire to be heard\nupon the point of order?\nMR. [A L] U LLMAN [of Oregon]: Mr.\nSpeaker, I concede the point of order.\nTHESPEAKER : The gentleman from\nOregon concedes the point of order,\nand the point of order is sustained.\nÐSenate Amendment Limiting\nUse of Foreign Tax Credits\n§35.54 Where a bill amends ex-\nisting law relating to a cer-tain subject in several di-\nverse respects, additional\namendments germane to that\nsubject may be germane to\nthe bill.\nTo a House bill containing sev-\neral sections amending diverse\nportions of the Internal Revenue\nCode to provide certain individual\nand business tax credits, a new\nsection of a Senate amendment in\nthe nature of a substitute con-\ntained in a conference report,\nwhich added a new section to the\nHouse bill and which dealt with\nearnings and profits of controlled\nforeign corporations and included\nlimitations on the use of foreign\ntax credits from foreign oil-related\nincome was held germane. The\nproceedings of Mar. 26, 1975,(18)\nwere as follows:\nSEC. 602. T AXATION OFEARNINGS AND\nPROFITS OF CONTROLLED FOREIGN\nCORPORATIONS AND THEIR SHARE -\nHOLDERS .\n(a) R EPEAL OF MINIMUM DISTRIBU -\nTION EXCEPTION TOREQUIREMENT OF\nCURRENT TAXATION OFSUBPART F IN-\nCOME .Ð\n(1) R EPEAL OF MINIMUM DISTRIBU -\nTION PROVISIONS .ÐSection 963 (relat-\ning to receipt of minimum distributions\nby domestic corporations) is hereby re-\npealed.\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01507 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8888DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n(2) C ERTAIN DISTRIBUTIONS BY CON -\nTROLLED FOREIGN CORPORATIONS TO\nREGULATED INVESTMENT COMPANIES\nTREATED AS DIVIDENDS .ÐSubsection (b)\nof section 851 (relating to limitations\non definition of regulated investment\ncompany) is amended by adding at the\nend thereof the following new sentence:\n``For purposes of paragraph (2), there\nshall be treated as dividends amounts\nincluded in gross income under section\n951(a)(1)(A)(i) for the taxable year to\nthe extent that, under section\n959(a)(1), there is a distribution out of\nthe earnings and profits of the taxable\nyear which are attributable to the\namounts so included.''. ..\nLIMITATION ON FOREIGN TAX CREDIT\nFOR TAXES PAID IN CONNECTION WITH\nFOREIGN OIL AND GAS INCOME\nHouse bill.ÐNo provision.\nSenate amendment.ÐThe Senate\namendment repeals the foreign tax\ncredit on all foreign oil-related income\nand allows any taxes on that income as\na deduction. The amendment also pro-\nvides that foreign oil-related income is\nto be taxed at a 24-percent rate.\nConference substitute.ÐThe con-\nference substitute modifies the Senate\namendment and applies a strict limita-\ntion on the use of foreign tax credits\nfrom foreign oil extraction income and\nforeign oil-related income. . . .\nMR. [W ILLIAM A.] S TEIGER of Wis-\nconsin: Mr. Speaker, I make a point of\norder against the conference report on\nthe ground that it contains matter\nwhich is in violation of the provisions\nof clause 7 of rule XVI. The non-\ngermane matter that I am specifically\nreferring to is that section of the report\ndealing with taxation of earnings andprofits of controlled foreign corpora-\ntions and their shareholders in section\n602 as reported by the committee of\nconference. . . .\nAs the Speaker well knows, I am\nsure, from listening carefully to the ex-\nplanations regarding previous points of\norder, at no point during the consider-\nation of the House-passed bill is there\nany mention of foreign taxation and\nthe dealings of foreign taxes insofar as\nAmerican corporations and their sub-\nsidiaries are concerned.\nTitle I of the 1975 tax bill dealt with\nthe refund for 1974 taxes. Title II dealt\nwith reductions in individual income\ntaxes. Title III dealt with certain\nchanges in business taxes, the title\nwhich dealt with the investment tax\ncredit or income tax total, particularly\nas related to small businesses.\nThis particular provision, Mr. Speak-\ner, in no way deals with a matter that\nwas covered, mentioned, or dealt with\nby the bill that is presented to the\nHouse, or voted upon by the House.\n...\nMR. [A L] U LLMAN [of Oregon]: . ..\nMr. Speaker, the bill that the House\npassed had a great many diverse sec-\ntions in it; it had credits. The matter\nthat has been raised is an amendment\nto the Internal Revenue Code very\nclearly, and much of it is in the way of\na credit. We have dealt with credits\nhere both for individuals and for cor-\nporations in the bill that the House\npassed.\nIt seems to me that in a bill of this\nscope and in a bill that deals as broad-\nly with tax credits and matters such as\nthis that does involve an amendment\nto the Internal Revenue Code, it is\nvery clearly within the province of the\nbill, and should be ruled germane.\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01508 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8889AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n19.Carl Albert (Okla.).\n20.S. 1±1951 (Committee on Armed\nServices).\n1.97 C ONG. REC. 3889, 82d Cong. 1st\nSess., Apr. 13, 1951.THESPEAKER :(19)The Chair is pre-\npared to rule.\nFor the reasons stated in the opinion\nof the Chair on a similar point of order\nmade by the gentleman from New York\n(Mr. Conable) and for the reasons stat-\ned by the gentleman from Oregon, the\nChair overrules the point of order.\nQualifications for Entering\nArmed ForcesÐAmendment\nTo Allow Noncitizens To Vol-\nunteer\n§35.55 To a proposition that\nwithin certain limits persons\nof prescribed ages be given\nan opportunity to enter the\narmed forces, an amendment\nproviding that within certain\nlimits any person, whether a\ncitizen of the United States\nor of any friendly nation, be\ngiven an opportunity to\nenter the armed forces was\nheld to be germane.\nIn the 82d Congress, a bill(20)\nwas under consideration com-\nprising amendments to the Uni-\nversal Military Training and Serv-\nice Act. The following amendment\nwas offered to the bill:(1)\nAmendment offered by Mr. Poage:\nPage 30, strike out all of line 10through 17, inclusive, and insert in\nlieu thereof the following:\n(2) Within the limits of the overall\nmilitary manpower needs of the\nUnited States and notwithstanding\nany other provision of law any per-\nson whether a citizen of the United\nStates or of any friendly nation and\nany national of Western Germany or\nJapan who meets all the other quali-\nfications for service in the Armed\nForces of the United States . ..\nshall be afforded an opportunity to\nvolunteer for induction for service in\nthe Armed Forces of the United\nStates. ...\nA point of order was raised against\nthe amendment, as follows:\nMR. [W. S TERLING ] C OLE [of New\nYork]: Mr. Chairman, I make a point\nof order against the amendment of-\nfered by the gentleman from Texas\nupon the ground that it indirectly af-\nfects the naturalization laws of the\ncountry which are not a part of the\npending measure.\nIn defense of the amendment,\nthe proponent stated as follows:\nMR. [W ILLIAM R.] P OAGE [of Texas]:\nMr. Chairman, this amendment simply\nchanges the provisions under which\npersons may be taken into the armed\nservices of the United States. The bill\nnow provides that within certain limits\npersons of prescribed ages shall be\ngiven an opportunity to come into the\nservice of the United States. We\nchange those conditions and one of the\nlimitations we impose is to say that no\none shall become a citizen of the\nUnited States simply by virtue of this\nact. That in no wise changes or any\nmanner affects the present immigra-\ntion laws of the United States because\nthere is no immigration law of the\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01509 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8890DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n2.Jere Cooper (Tenn.).\n3.97 C ONG. REC. 3890, 82d Cong. 1st\nSess., Apr. 13, 1951.\n4.H.R. 9554 (Committee on Armed\nServices).\n5.96 C ONG. R EC. 13866, 13867, 81st\nCong. 2d Sess., Aug. 30, 1950.6.Id. at p. 13867.\n7.Porter Hardy, Jr. (Va.).\n8.96 C ONG. R EC. 13867, 13868, 81st\nCong. 2d Sess., Aug. 30, 1950.United States that says that anyone\nwho serves under the terms of this bill\nshall or shall not become a citizen of\nthe United States. ..\nThe Chairman(2)ruled:(3)\nThe Chair is inclined to think that\non the face of the amendment, as it ap-\npears, it would be germane to the\npending bill, and overrules the point of\norder.\nBill To Amend Selective Serv-\nice Act To Provide for Induc-\ntion of Medical SpecialistsÐ\nAmendment Relating to In-\nduction of Aliens\n§35.56 To a bill to amend the\nSelective Service Act of 1948\nto provide for special reg-\nistration, classification, and\ninduction of certain medical\nand dental and ``allied spe-\ncialists,'' an amendment re-\nlating to induction of aliens\nwas held to be not germane.\nIn the 81st Congress, during\nconsideration of a bill(4)to amend\nthe Selective Service Act of 1948,\nthe following amendment was of-\nfered:(5)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [Mike]\nMansfield [of Montana]: Page 8, line\n22, insert a new section 7 as follows:That the second sentence of sec-\ntion 4 (a) of the Selective Service Act\nof 1948, as amended, is hereby\namended to read as follows:\nAny citizen of a foreign country, who\nis not . .. exempt from . .. service\nunder the provisions of this title . ..\nshall be relieved from liability for . ..\nservice . .. if . .. he has made appli-\ncation to be relieved from such liability\nin the manner prescribed by . .. rules\nand regulations prescribed by the\nPresident; but any person who makes\nsuch application shall thereafter be\ndebarred from becoming a citizen of\nthe United States. ...\nA point of order against the\namendment was reserved, as fol-\nlows:(6)\nMR. [C ARL] VINSON [of Georgia]: Mr.\nChairman, I reserve a point of order on\nthe amendment on the ground that the\namendment is not germane to the bill\nwhich is to provide for special registra-\ntion of certain medical, dental, and al-\nlied specialist categories and does not\nembrace the subject matter which the\ngentleman is seeking to add to the bill\nby his amendment.\nThe Chairman(7)sustained the\npoint of order. He stated:(8)\nIt is true that the bill mentions the\nSelective Service Act of 1948; however,\nit amends it in a certain specific man-\nner and in certain specific categories.\nThe Chair is inclined to believe that\nthe amendment offered by the gen-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01510 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8891AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n9.H.R. 7819 (Committee on Education\nand Labor).\n10.113 C ONG. REC. 13582, 90th Cong.\n1st Sess., May 23, 1967. 11.Charles M. Price (Ill.).tleman from Montana goes far beyond\nthe scope of the bill now before us and\ntherefore sustains the point of order.\nBill Amending Various Edu-\ncation ActsÐAmendment\nMaking Principles of Civil\nRights Act Applicable in Ad-\nministration of Programs\n§35.57 To a bill amending var-\nious education acts and pro-\nviding new authorizations\nfor education grants to\nstates, an amendment de-\nsigned to insure that admin-\nistration of programs author-\nized by the bill or amended\nacts conform to principles es-\ntablished by the Civil Rights\nAct of 1964 was held to be\ngermane.\nIn the 90th Congress, during\nconsideration of the Elementary\nand Secondary Education Act\nAmendments of 1967,(9)the fol-\nlowing amendment was of-\nfered:(10)\nAmendment offered by Mrs. [Edith\nS.] Green of Oregon: On page 44, after\nline 8, insert the following:\nADMINISTRATION\nSec. 2. Rules . .. guidelines, or\nother published interpretations or\norders issued by the Department ofHealth, Education, and Welfare or\nthe United States Office of Edu-\ncation . .. affecting . .. administra-\ntion of programs authorized by this\nAct or by any Act amended by this\nAct shall contain immediately fol-\nlowing each substantive provision of\nsuch rules . .. citations to the . ..\nstatutory law upon which such provi-\nsion is based. All such rules . ..\nguidelines, interpretations, or orders\nshall be uniformly applied and en-\nforced throughout the fifty States.\nA point of order was raised\nagainst the amendment, as fol-\nlows:\nMR. [B YRON G.] R OGERS [of Colo-\nrado]: Mr. Chairman, I make a point of\norder against the amendment which\nhas been offered by the gentlewoman\nfrom Oregon [Mrs. Green], based upon\nthe proposition that the gentlewoman\nmakes references to rules and regula-\ntions promulgated pursuant to titles IV\nand VI of the Civil Rights Act.\nAnd then she goes into a question of\nguidelines. . .. [T]he reference to\nguidelines is not an amendment to any\npiece of legislation that is being consid-\nered by us at this time, and therefore\nis out of order and not germane.\nThe Chairman,(11)in ruling on\nthe point of order, stated:\nThe Chair would like to point out\nthat this amendment is specifically, by\nthe language contained therein, di-\nrected toward the administration of\nprograms authorized by this act, or by\nany act amended by this act. The\nChair therefore overrules the point of\norder.\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01511 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8892DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n12.122 C ONG. REC. 13529, 13530, 94th\nCong. 2d Sess.\n13.A bill to amend the Higher Edu-\ncation Act of 1965.Bill Amending Higher Edu-\ncation LawsÐAmendment To\nProhibit Student Admission\nQuotas in All Schools\n§35.58 To a bill amending the\nGeneral Education Provi-\nsions Act in one narrow re-\nspect relating to higher edu-\ncation, an amendment to that\nAct prohibiting the imposi-\ntion of student admission\nquotas not only in institu-\ntions of higher education but\nalso in public preschool, ele-\nmentary and secondary pro-\ngrams was held more general\nin scope and not germane.\nOn May 12, 1976,(12)during con-\nsideration of H.R. 12851(13)in the\nCommittee of the Whole, the\nChair, in sustaining a point of\norder against an amendment, held\nthat to a bill amending and ex-\ntending various laws relating to\nhigher education, an amendment\nimposing restrictions on pre-\nschool, elementary and secondary\neducation policy broadened the\nscope of the bill and was not ger-\nmane.\nAmendment offered by Mr. Eshle-\nman: On page 86, line 25, insert ``(a)''\nimmediately after ``Sec. 202''.On page 87, immediately after line 7,\ninsert the following new subsection:\n(b) Section 440 of the General Edu-\ncation Provisions Act is amended by in-\nserting ``(a)'' immediately after ``Sec.\n440'' and adding at the end thereof the\nfollowing new subsection:\n``(b) It shall be unlawful for the Sec-\nretary to require the imposition of\nquotas, goals, or any other numerical\nrequirements on the student admission\npractice of a State or local educational\nagency or institution of higher edu-\ncation, community college school, agen-\ncy offering a pre-school program, or\nother educational institution receiving\nFederal funds, whether directly or in-\ndirectly, under any provision of law,\nand funds shall not be deferred or lim-\nited on the basis of failure to comply\nwith such numerical require-\nments.'' ...\nMR. [F RANK ] THOMPSON [Jr., of New\nJersey]: Mr. Chairman, I make the\npoint of orderÐI respectfully regret\nthat I must do so, I will say to my\nfriend from PennsylvaniaÐthat the\namendment is nongermane.\nMr. Chairman, this is a higher edu-\ncation bill. While a very few of these\nprovisions may have an impact on sec-\nondary schools, it is entirely indirect.\nThe great majority of the bill, more\nthan 90 percent, is in higher education.\nAs a matter of fact, 100 percent of it is.\nThis can only be characterized as a\nhigher education bill.\nThe gentleman's amendment deals\nwith the admissions practices of ele-\nmentary and secondary schools, and\neven preschools. That subject matter is\ncompletely foreign to the subject mat-\nter of the bill. I repeat, it is a higher\neducation bill.\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01512 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8893AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n14.James C. Wright, Jr. (Tex.).15.A bill to amend the Higher Edu-\ncation Act of 1965.\n16.122 C ONG. REC. 13530, 94th Cong.\n2d Sess.The gentleman's amendment, by\nreaching out to admissions policies of\npreschool, elementary and secondary\nschools, goes too far and is, therefore,\nnot germane. There is one amendment\nin the bill, Mr. Chairman, of the Gen-\neral Education Provision Act which the\ngentleman's amendment attempts to\namend. Here too, however, the com-\nmittee bill is exclusively a higher edu-\ncation bill.\nThe committee amendment to the\nGeneral Education Provisions Act pro-\nposes a 1-year extension of the ``fund\nfor the improvement of postsecondary\neducation.'' This is the only way the\ncommittee bill amends the general\neducation provisions at all.\nFurther, Mr. Chairman, the amend-\nment deals with the institution for re-\nceiving Federal funds directly or indi-\nrectly under any provision of law. Mr.\nChairman, I repeat that under any\nprovision of law, this is beyond the\nlimited scope of the bill. ...\nMR. [E DWIN D.] E SHLEMAN [of Penn-\nsylvania]: Mr. Chairman, I would just\npoint out to the Chair that I submitted\nthis amendment under section 202,\nwhich is opening section 404 of the\nGeneral Education Provisions Act,\nwhich I think we have amended on oc-\ncasion before in this House, because we\nare under the provision of general edu-\ncation. ...\nTHECHAIRMAN :(14)The Chair is pre-\npared to rule.\nThe committee amendment clearly\nrefers to higher education and, with\nonly extremely narrow exceptions, con-\ntains no matter that would substan-\ntially relate to other programs.\nOn the other hand, the amendment\noffered by the gentleman from Penn-sylvania (Mr. Eshleman) contains a\nprohibition against certain require-\nments with respect to admission poli-\ncies by the language of the amend-\nment, ``. ..a State or local edu-\ncational agency,'' or further by the lan-\nguage of the amendment, ``. ..agency\noffering a pre-school program,'' or, in\neven broader language contained in\nthe amendment, ``. ..other edu-\ncational institution receiving Federal\nfundsÐunder any provision of law.''\nUnder the circumstances, the Chair\nis persuaded that the amendment as\ndrafted is not germane to the bill be-\nfore the committee and, therefore, the\nChair sustains the point of order.\nÐAmendment To Prohibit Stu-\ndent Admission Quotas in\nHigher Education Programs\n§35.59 To a bill amending and\nextending various laws relat-\ning to higher education, a\nfurther amendment to one of\nthose laws prohibiting the\nimposition of student admis-\nsion quotas in applicable\nhigher education programs\nwas held germane as within\nthe category of laws being\namended by the bill.\nDuring consideration of H.R.\n12851(15)in the Committee of the\nWhole on May 12, 1976,(16)the\nChair, in overruling a point of\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01513 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8894DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n17.James C. Wright, Jr. (Tex.).order against an amendment to\nthat bill, demonstrated that, to a\nbill comprehensively amending\nseveral laws within the same\nclass, an amendment further\namending one of those laws on a\nsubject within that same class is\ngermane.\nMR. [E DWIN D.] E SHLEMAN [of Penn-\nsylvania]: Mr. Chairman, I offer an\namendment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Eshle-\nman: On page 86, line 25, insert ``(a)''\nimmediately after ``Sec. 202''.\nOn page 87, immediately after line\n7, insert the following new sub-\nsection:\n(b) Section 440 of the General\nEducation Provisions Act is amended\nby inserting ``(a)'' immediately after\n``Sec. 440'' and adding at the end\nthereof the following new subsection:\n``(b) It shall be unlawful for the\nSecretary to require the imposition\nof quotas, goals, or any other numer-\nical requirements on the student ad-\nmission practice of an institution of\nhigher education, community college\nreceiving Federal funds, whether di-\nrectly or indirectly, under any appli-\ncable programs, and funds shall not\nbe deferred or limited on the basis of\nfailure to comply with such numer-\nical requirements.''\nMR. [F RANK ] THOMPSON [Jr., of New\nJersey]: Mr. Chairman, I make a point\nof order against the amendment. ...\nMr. Chairman, the fact is that there\nremains language in the gentleman's\namendment which says, ``. ..under\nany provisions of law, and funds shall\nnot be deferred or limited on the basis\nof failure to comply with such numer-\nical requirements.''The fact that the entire scope of the\nact is quoted, and ``. ..any provision\nof law'' still remains in, I would insist,\nMr. Chairman, makes it not germane\nto the legislation to which it is ad-\ndressed. ...\nMR. E SHLEMAN : Mr. Chairman, I\nwould first point out, respectfully, that\nthe gentleman from New Jersey (Mr.\nThompson) is incorrect. I did not leave\nin ``under any provision of law.'' I\nchanged it to ``under any applicable\nprograms.'' And that original termi-\nnology is not in there, as the gen-\ntleman stated. I have attemptedÐ\nmaybe, let me say, in Pennsylvania\nDutchÐto limit this to institutions of\nhigher education. ...\nTHECHAIRMAN :(17)The Chair is pre-\npared to rule.\nThe Chair has very carefully re-\nviewed the changes made by the gen-\ntleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Eshle-\nman) in the language contained in the\namendment as originally offered. The\nChair observes that the amendment\npresently before the Committee is lim-\nited in its scope to institutions of high-\ner education or community colleges,\nand that it applies only to those insti-\ntutions of higher education and com-\nmunity colleges which receive Federal\nfunds under any applicable program.\nThe Chair believes that the amend-\nment as presently drafted before the\nCommittee is germane to the bill, and\nthe point of order is overruled.\nThe Chair recognizes the gentleman\nfrom Pennsylvania (Mr. Eshleman) in\nsupport of his amendment.\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01514 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8895AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n18.120 C ONG. R EC. 8508, 8509, 93d\nCong. 2d Sess.\n19.A bill to amend and extend the Ele-\nmentary and Secondary Education\nAct.\n20.Charles M. Price (Ill.).Administration of Federally\nFunded Educational Pro-\ngramsÐRemedies for Denial\nof Equal Educational Oppor-\ntunity\n§35.60 To an Education and\nLabor Committee amend-\nment in the nature of a sub-\nstitute extending and amend-\ning several laws relating to\nfederal assistance to state\nand local educational agen-\ncies and prescribing stand-\nards to be followed by edu-\ncational agencies in the ad-\nministration of federally\nfunded educational pro-\ngrams, an amendment pro-\nscribing educational agen-\ncies from denying equal edu-\ncational opportunity to pub-\nlic school students and pro-\nviding judicial and adminis-\ntrative remedies for denials\nof equal educational oppor-\ntunity and of equal protec-\ntion of the laws was held ger-\nmane.\nThe proceedings of Mar. 26,\n1974, during consideration of H.R.\n69, to amend and extend the Ele-\nmentary and Secondary Education\nAct, are discussed in Sec. 3,\nsupra.Amendments to Diverse Edu-\ncational Assistance LawsÐ\nAmendment Affecting Type of\nAssistance Covered in An-\nother Title .\n§35.61 To a portion of a bill\namending several miscella-\nneous laws on a general sub-\nject, an amendment to an-\nother law relating to that\nsubject is germane; thus, to a\ntitle of an amendment in the\nnature of a substitute\namending several diverse\neducational assistance laws,\nan amendment affecting laws\nrelating to federal impact\nschool assistance was held\ngermane, even though that\nsubject matter had been con-\ntained in another title al-\nready passed in the reading\nfor amendment.\nOn Mar. 27, 1974,(18)during\nconsideration of H.R. 69(19)in the\nCommittee of the Whole, the pro-\nceedings were as follows:\nTHECHAIRMAN :(20)The Clerk will\nread.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01515 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8896DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\nTITLE XÐMISCELLANEOUS\nAMENDMENTS\nAMENDMENT OF EMERGENCY SCHOOL\nAID ACT\nSec. 901. (a) Section 706(a) of the\nEmergency School Aid Act is amend-\ned (1) by striking out paragraph (3),\n(2) by striking out the period at the\nend of paragraph (1)(D) and insert-\ning, ``; or'' and (3) by adding at the\nend of such paragraph (1) the fol-\nlowing:\n``(E) which will establish or main-\ntain one or more integrated schools\nas defined in section 720(7) and\nwhichÐ\n``(i) has a sufficient number of mi-\nnority group children to comprise\nmore than 50 per centum of the\nnumber of children in attendance at\nthe schools of such agency, and\n``(ii) has agreed to apply for an\nequal amount of assistance under\nsubsection (b).''. ..\nSec. 902. (a)(1) Sections 134(b) (as\nredesignated by sections 109 and\n110(h) of this Act), 202(a)(1), and\n302(a)(1) of the Act are each amend-\ned by striking out ``Puerto\nRico,''. ...\n(b)(1) Section 612(a)(1) of the Edu-\ncation of the Handicapped Act is\namended by striking out ``Puerto\nRico,''.\n(2) Sections 612(a)(2) and 613(a)(1)\nof the Education of the Handicapped\nAct are each amended by striking\nout ``the Commonwealth of Puerto\nRico,''. ...\nMR. [R OBERT J.] H UBER [of Michi-\ngan]: Mr. Chairman, I offer an\namendment to the committee sub-\nstitute.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Huber\nto the committee substitute: Page\n131, immediately after line 15, insert\nthe following new section:AMENDMENT TO PUBLIC LAW 874\nSec. 906. Section 403(3) of the Act\nof September 30, 1950 (Public Law\n874, Eighty-first Congress), is\namended to read as follows:\n``(3) The term `parent' means any\nparent, stepparent, legal guardian,\nor other individual standing in loco\nparentis, whose income from employ-\nment on Federal property is more\nthan 50 percent of the total com-\nbined income of such individual and\nthe spouse of such individual.''.\nPoints of order against the\namendment were reserved and\nsubsequently discussed by Mr.\nCarl D. Perkins, of Kentucky, and\nMr. Gerald R. Ford, of Michigan:\nMR. PERKINS : I insist on the point of\norder. This is an impact amendment\nand we have already passed that title.\nTHECHAIRMAN : Is that the position\nof the gentleman from Michigan?\nMR. FORD: Yes, Mr. Chairman. I in-\nsist on the point of order. I did not\npress the point of order before the gen-\ntleman had an opportunity to explain\nwhat he was trying to do. I think his\nmotives are fine, but I disagree with\nthe result it would have. I wanted him\nto have an opportunity to do that; but\nclearly his amendment comes too late,\nsince we have already concluded title\nIII of the act which dealt with impact\naid.\nThe amendment the gentleman now\noffers is not a peripheral or general\namendment. It is a substantive amend-\nment of the definition of a child quali-\nfying for impact aid under the basic act\ncovered in title III of this bill.\nTHECHAIRMAN : The Chair is ready\nto rule.\nThe Chair holds that while an exam-\nination of the amendment shows it\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01516 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8897AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n1.122 C ONG. REC. 13419, 13427, 94th\nCong. 2d Sess.\n2.The Vocational Education Act\namendments. 3.B.F. Sisk (Calif.).would have been more appropriately\noffered to another title of the bill, the\nChair does observe that the title which\nis under consideration is referred to as\nMiscellaneous Amendments and it\namends several other acts, the Emer-\ngency School Aid Act, the Education of\nthe Handicapped Act and others; so in\nview of these circumstances, the Chair\nis constrained to overrule the point of\norder.\nAmendment Not Confined to\nLaw Under Consideration;\nRestrictions Imposed Under\n``This or Any Other Act''\n§35.62 To a bill amending an\nexisting law, an amendment\nprohibiting assistance under\nthat Act or under any other\nAct for a particular purpose\nwas held too general in\nscope, affecting laws not\nbeing amended by the bill\nand was ruled out as not ger-\nmane.\nOn May 11, 1976,(1)during con-\nsideration of H.R. 12835(2)in the\nCommittee of the Whole, the\nChair sustained a point of order\nagainst the following amendment:\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr.\nConlan: On page 190, between lines\n3 and 4, add the following new sub-\nsection:``Sec. 302. (g) The General Edu-\ncation Provisions Act is amended by\nadding the following new section:\n```Sec. ( ). No grants, contracts, or\nsupport are authorized under this or\nany other Act for any purpose in con-\nnection with the Man: A Course of\nStudy (MACOS) curriculum program\nor materials, or in connection with\nthe high school sequel to MACOS,\nExploring Human Nature. '''....\nMR. [C ARL D.] P ERKINS [of Ken-\ntucky]: Mr. Chairman, I make a point\nof order against the amendment be-\ncause it is not germane.\nTHE CHAIRMAN :(3)The gentleman\nwill state his point of order.\nMR. PERKINS : It is funded by the Na-\ntional Science Foundation, Mr. Chair-\nman. It affects the National Science\nFoundation; therefore, it is not ger-\nmane. ...\nMR. [J OHN B.] C ONLAN [of Arizona]:\n... Mr. Chairman, the National Insti-\ntute for Education, which is a part of\nthis bill, has the educational resource\ninformation clearing housesÐ18 of\nthemÐacross the Nation, including the\none at the University of Indiana, which\nis totally computerized and which dis-\nseminates information in this area. So\nI do think the matter is germane.\nTHECHAIRMAN : The Chair is pre-\npared to rule.\nThe gentleman from Kentucky\nmakes a point of order against the\namendment offered by the gentleman\nfrom Arizona on the basis of germane-\nness. The Chair in a quick examination\nof the amendment notes that the\namendment reads:\nNo grants, contracts, or support\nare authorized under this or any\nother Act. ...\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01517 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8898DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n4.International Security and Develop-\nment Cooperation Act of 1987.\n5.133 C ONG. R EC. 34592, 34595,\n34675, 34676, 100th Cong. 1st Sess.And on that basis the Chair is going\nto sustain the point of order because of\nthe fact that the amendment goes be-\nyond the scope of this pending bill.\nThe Chair sustains the point of\norder.\n§35.63 To a title of a bill pri-\nmarily amending the Foreign\nAssistance Act reported from\nthe Committee on Foreign\nAffairs to authorize assist-\nance for Africa (containing\none reference to another law,\nthe Export-Import Bank Act,\nnot directly amended and\nalso within the jurisdiction\nof another committee), an\namendment restricting the\navailability of funds in that\nbill ``or any other Act'' to sup-\nport the activities of the Afri-\ncan National Congress was\nheld to be not germane.\nDuring consideration of H.R.\n3100(4)in the Committee of the\nWhole on Dec. 9 and 10, 1987,(5)it\nwas held that to a bill amending\nan existing law to authorize a pro-\ngram, an amendment restricting\nauthorizations under that or any\nother Act is not germane. The pro-\nceedings were as follows:TITLE VIII ÐAFRICA\nPARTAÐA FRICA FAMINE RECOVERY\nAND DEVELOPMENT\nSEC. 801. SHORT TITLE .\nThis part may be cited as the ``Af-\nrica Famine Recovery and Develop-\nment Act''. ...\nPart I of the Foreign Assistance\nAct of 1961 is amended by adding\nafter chapter 6 the following new\nchapter:\n``CHAPTER 7ÐAFRICA FAMINE\nRECOVERY AND DEVELOPMENT\n``SEC. 476. OTHER ASSISTANCE PRO -\nGRAMS .\n``To the maximum extent prac-\nticable, resources allocated for sub-\nSaharan Africa under chapter 4 of\npart II (relating to the Economic\nSupport Fund), title IV of chapter 2\nof this part (relating to the Overseas\nPrivate Investment Corporation), the\nExport-Import Bank Act of 1945, the\nPeace Corps Act, and the African De-\nvelopment Foundation Act shall be\nused to provide assistance which\nmeets the criteria specified in section\n472(b). To the maximum extent prac-\nticable, the agency primarily respon-\nsible for administering this part\nshould use resources and authorities\navailable under the Agricultural\nTrade Development and Assistance\nAct of 1954, section 416(b) of the Ag-\nricultural Act of 1949, and the Food\nfor Progress Act of 1985 to com-\nplement the assistance provided\nunder section 472. ...\nMR. [D AN] B URTON of Indiana: Mr.\nChairman, I offer an amendment. ...\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Burton\nof Indiana: Page 201, after line 5, in-\nsert the following:\nSEC. 830. PROHIBITION ON ASSISTANCE\nTO THE AFRICAN NATIONAL CONGRESS .\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01518 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8899AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n6.Les AuCoin (Ore.).(a) Prohibition.ÐNone of the funds\nauthorized to be appropriated by this\nor any other Act may be used to sup-\nport, directly or indirectly, activities\nof the African National Congress.\n(b) Waiver.ÐSubsection (a) may be\nwaived by the President if he cer-\ntifies to the Congress thatÐ\n(1) the National Executive Com-\nmittee of the African National Con-\ngress has taken a stand publicly and\nofficially opposing the practice of\n``necklacing'', the practice of execu-\ntion by fire, used against South Afri-\ncan blacks. ...\n(3) the African National Congress\nno longer receives its primary finan-\ncial, military, and training support\nfrom the Soviet Union or other Com-\nmunist countries listed in section\n620(f) of the Foreign Assistance Act\nof 1961. ...\nMR. [M ICKEY ] L ELAND [of Texas]:\nMr. Chairman, I raise a point of order\nagainst the amendment. ...\nThe point of order has to do with\ngermaneness, Mr. Chairman. The gen-\ntleman's amendment goes a lot farther\nbeyond the purview of the responsi-\nbility of the Foreign Affairs Com-\nmittee, and thus also the parameters\nof the bill itself that we are debating\nhere. It reaches the interest of other\nagencies that are not within the juris-\ndiction of the consideration of this leg-\nislation at this time, and therefore it is\nnongermane to the arguments that we\npursue here today.\nAlso, Mr. Chairman, the amendment\nthat the gentleman has offered goes a\nlot farther than any other amendment\nthat has been offered here today. It is\nmuch broader, the scope of which is too\nfar reaching to be relevant to the dis-\ncussions we have here today under the\nforeign aid bill. ...\nTHECHAIRMAN :(6)The Chair is pre-\npared to rule.The Chair would state that accord-\ning to the Procedures of the House,\nand quoting from section 8, chapter 28,\nthe following:\n... a bill authorizing appropria-\ntions for a particular program for 10\nfiscal years, an amendment restrict-\ning authorizations under any act of\nCongress for any fiscal year contin-\ngent upon implementation of a plan\nto reduce spending under the bill\nwas held not germane as not con-\nfined to the bill under consideration.\nThe Chair would note in reading\nthat amendment of the gentleman\nfrom Indiana that the gentleman pro-\nvides a prohibition on funds appro-\npriated by this or any other act, and\nthe Chair can find in no other instance\nin title VIII as amended where there is\nany similar prohibition.\nFor that reason, the Chair would\nrule that the gentleman's amendment\ngoes beyond the scope of title VIII and\nis not germane. Therefore, the point of\norder is sustained.\nEntities Subject to Penalties of\nAntidiscrimination LawsÐ\nAmendment To Redefine Na-\nture of Sex Discrimination\n§35.64 To a bill amending ex-\nisting law in several particu-\nlars but relating to a single\nsubject affected thereby, an\namendment proposing to\nmodify the law but not re-\nlated to the single subject of\nthe bill is not germane; thus,\nto a bill narrowly amending\nan anti-discrimination provi-\nsion in the Education\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01519 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8900DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n7.130 C ONG. R EC. 18842, 18846,\n18847, 98th Cong. 2d Sess.Amendments of 1972 only to\nclarify the definition of a dis-\ncriminating entity subject to\nthe statutory penalties, an\namendment redefining one\nclass of discrimination (sex\ndiscrimination) was ruled\nnon-germane as beyond the\nscope of the bill.\nOn June 26, 1984,(7)during con-\nsideration of H.R. 5490 (the Civil\nRights Act of 1984), the Chair\nsustained a point of order against\nan amendment as described\nabove:\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nSec. 2. (a) The matter preceding\nclause (1) of section 901(a) of the\nEducation Amendments of 1972\n(hereafter in this section referred to\nas the ``Act'') is amendedÐ\n(1) by striking out ``in'' the second\ntime it appears;\n(2) by striking out ``the benefits of''\nand inserting in lieu thereof ``bene-\nfits''; and\n(3) by striking out ``under any edu-\ncation program or activity receiving''\nand inserting in lieu thereof ``by any\neducation recipient of''.\n(b) Section 901(c) of the Act is\namended by inserting ``(1)'' after the\nsubsection designation and by add-\ning at the end thereof the following\nnew paragraph:\n``(2) For the purpose of this title,\nthe term `recipient' meansÐ\n``(A) any State or political subdivi-\nsion thereof, or any instrumentality\nof a State or political subdivision\nthereof, or any public or private\nagency, institution, or organization,or other entity (including any\nsubunit of any such State, subdivi-\nsion, instrumentality, agency, insti-\ntution, organization, or entity), and\n``(B) any successor, assignee, or\ntransferee of any such State, subdivi-\nsion, instrumentality, agency, insti-\ntution, organization, or entity or of\nany such subunit,\nto which Federal financial assistance\nis extended (directly or through an-\nother entity or a person), or which\nreceives support from the extension\nof Federal financial assistance to any\nof its subunits.''. ...\nMR. [W ILLIAM E.] D ANNEMEYER [of\nCalifornia]: Mr. Chairman, I offer an\namendment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Danne-\nmeyer: On page 3, line 10, strike out\n``paragraph'' and insert in lieu there-\nof ``paragraphs''.\nOn page 3, line 25, strike out the\nclose quotation marks and the period\nat the end thereof.\nOn page 3, after line 25, insert the\nfollowing:\n``(3) For the purpose of this title,\nthe term `sex' does not include sexual\npreference or orientation.''.\nMR. [P AUL] SIMON [of Illinois]: . ..\nThe point of order is that this is not\ngermane to this bill. The classifications\nthat historically have been considered\nand have been considered under this\nbill are race, national origin, sex,\nhandicapped, and aged.\nThe gentleman from California is at-\ntempting to add a new clarification\nhere that is not germane to the legisla-\ntion pending before this body. ...\nMR. D ANNEMEYER : ... I am not\nseeking to add a new term. The term\n``sex'' is in the law.\nAll I am seeking to do by this\namendment is to make clear that we\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01520 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8901AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n8.Al Swift (Wash.).9.130 C ONG. REC. 18856, 18857, 98th\nCong. 2d Sess.do not, as the policymaking body of\nthis country, in terms of law, choose to\ntake our society down the road where\nsomeone sooner or later is going to\nargue that the term ``sex'' in the law\nincludes sexual preference or orienta-\ntion. I am not adding anything. I am\njust clarifying what that term means\ntoday as it is used in the law.\nTHECHAIRMAN :(8)The Chair is pre-\npared to rule on the point of order.\nThe Committee's report indicates\nthat the purpose of this legislation is\nto reaffirm the scope and the applica-\ntion of four civil rights laws to an in-\nterpretation which was generally ac-\ncepted before the Grove City College\ndecision. It does not seek to define\nwhat is a discriminatory act.\nIn other words, the bill deals with\nthe definition of ``potential discrimina-\ntors,'' in this instance, recipients of\nFederal financial assistance. It does\nnot deal with the definition of ``dis-\ncrimination.''\nBecause the gentleman's amendment\nwould address the definition of what\nconstitutes discrimination, his amend-\nment would not be in order.\nThe Chair would cite Deschler's Pro-\ncedure, 28.2:\nTo the proposition amending exist-\ning law in several particulars but re-\nlating to a single subject affected\nthereby, an amendment proposing to\nmodify the law but not related to the\nsubject of the pending proposition is\nnot germane.\nAnd in 28.4, Deschler continues:\nSimilarly, if a bill seeks only to\nmodify the penalty provisions of a\nlaw prescribing specific conduct, an\namendment is not germane if itseeks to broaden the scope or alter\nthe applicability of such law.\nTherefore, the Chair finds the gen-\ntleman's amendment not in order.\nÐAmendment To Expand Defi-\nnition of Persons Who Are\nSubjects of Discrimination\n§35.65 To a bill amending a\ngeneral law but only with re-\nspect to a specific issue, an\namendment relating to terms\nof the law not amended by\nthe bill, rather than to the\nissues contained in the bill,\nis not germane; thus, to a\nsection of a bill amending\nthe Age Discrimination Act\nonly to clarify the definition\nof a discriminating entity\nsubject to the penalties\nunder that statute, an\namendment to expand the\ndefinition of persons who are\nthe subject of discrimination\n(to include the unborn) was\nruled nongermane as beyond\nthe scope of the bill.\nDuring consideration of the\nCivil Rights Act of 1984 (H.R.\n5490) in the Committee of the\nWhole on June 26, 1984,(9)the\nChair sustained a point of order\nagainst the amendment described\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01521 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8902DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n10.Al Swift (Wash.).above. The proceedings were as\nfollows:\nThe Clerk read as follows: ...\n(e) Section 309 of the Act is\namended byÐ ...\n(3) by adding at the end thereof\nthe following new clause:\n``(4) the term `recipient' meansÐ\n``(A) any State or political subdivi-\nsion thereof, or any instrumentality\nof a State or political subdivision\nthereof, or any public or private\nagency, institution, or organization,\nor other entity (including any\nsubunit of any such State, subdivi-\nsion, instrumentality, agency, insti-\ntution, organization, or entity), and\n``(B) any successor, assignee, or\ntransferee of any such State, subdivi-\nsion, instrumentality, agency, insti-\ntution, organization, or entity or of\nany such subunit,\nto which Federal financial assistance\nis extended (directly or through an-\nother entity or a person), or which\nreceives support from the extension\nof Federal financial assistance to any\nof its subunits.''. ...\nMR. [M ARK] S ILJANDER [of Michi-\ngan]: Mr. Chairman, I offer an amend-\nment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Sil-\njander: Page 6, after line 18, insert\nthe following:\n(1) by inserting after ``person'',\n``(including unborn children, from the\nmoment of conception)''. ...\nMR. [P AUL] SIMON [of Illinois]: Mr.\nChairman, I make a point of order\nagainst the amendment.\nAgain it is the same point of order\nthat I made earlier. It is an attempt to\nadd a totally new definition. Again we\nare dealing with the traditional defini-\ntions of race, national origin, sex,\nhandicapped, and aged.This is a very legitimate issue to be\nbrought before this body, but this is\nnot the vehicle by which to do it. This\nis not the intent of it, and it does not\nfall within the germaneness of this\nparticular bill. ...\nMR. SILJANDER : Mr. Chairman, one\nof the differences is that the word,\n``person,'' is mentioned in the bill sev-\neral times, whereas in the other point\nof order the word, ``sex,'' was not at all\nmentioned in the specific bill.\nTHECHAIRMAN :(10)The Chair is pre-\npared to rule on the point of order.\nThis amendment amends a part of\nthe Age Discrimination Act of 1975\nthat is not before the committee. The\nbill has a very narrow purpose, and\nthe gentleman's amendment does not\nfall within that purpose.\nThe Chair would refer the gentleman\nto clause 7, rule XVI, the annotation of\nwhich reads:\nTo a bill amending a general law\non a specific point an amendment re-\nlating to the terms of the law rather\nthan to those of the bill was ruled\nnot to be germane; thus a bill\namending several sections of one\ntitle of the United States Code does\nnot necessarily bring the entire title\nunder consideration so as to permit\nan amendment to any portion there-\nof, and where a bill amends existing\nlaw in one narrow particular, an\namendment proposing to modify\nsuch existing law in other particu-\nlars will generally be ruled out as\nnot germane. Unless a bill so exten-\nsively amends existing law as to\nopen up the entire law to amend-\nment, the germaneness of an amend-\nment to the bill depends on its rela-\ntionship to the subject of the bill and\nnot to the entire law being amended.\nThe Chair finds the amendment not\ngermane and, therefore, not in order.\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01522 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8903AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n11.130 C ONG. R EC. 18857±62, 18864,\n98th Cong. 2d Sess.ÐAmendment To Extend Cov-\nerage of Laws to Members of\nCongress\n§35.66 To a bill narrowly\namending several civil rights\nstatutes only to clarify the\ncircumstances under which\nany institution currently re-\nceiving federal financial as-\nsistance may have such as-\nsistance terminated because\nof discrimination by such in-\nstitution, an amendment to\ndeem Members of Congress\nas recipients of federal finan-\ncial assistance for the pur-\npose of those statutes was\nheld not germane, since the\namendment required no\nshowing that Members of\nCongress do in fact receive\nfederal financial assistance\nas defined in those statutes,\nand thus expanded the scope\nof coverage of the laws\namended to a class unrelated\nto the group of institutions\naddressed in the bill and the\nlaws amended.\nOn June 26, 1984,(11)the Chair-\nman of the Committee of the\nWhole, in holding the amendment\ndescribed above as not being ger-\nmane demonstrated that, to a bill\nhaving as its fundamental pur-pose the clarification of eligibility\nof existing recipients for federal fi-\nnancial assistance under several\nstatutes, an amendment deeming\na specified entity to be a recipient\nof federal financial assistance for\nthe purposes of those laws was\nnot germane since it expanded the\nscope of the coverage of the laws\nbeing amended to a class not nec-\nessarily covered by the class of re-\ncipients in the bill.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nSec. 5. (a) Section 601 of the Civil\nRights Act of 1964 (hereafter in this\nsection referred to as the ``Act'') is\namendedÐ ...\n(3) by striking out ``under any pro-\ngram or activity receiving'' and in-\nserting in lieu thereof ``by any recipi-\nent of''. ...\n(c) Title VI of the Act is amended\nby adding at the end thereof the fol-\nlowing new section: ...\n``Sec. 606. For the purpose of this\ntitle, the term `recipient' meansÐ\n``(1) any State or political subdivi-\nsion thereof, or any instrumentality\nof a State or political subdivision\nthereof, or any public or private\nagency, institution, or organization,\nor other entity (including any\nsubunit of any such State, subdivi-\nsion, instrumentality, agency, insti-\ntution, organization, or entity), and\n``(2) any successor, assignee, or\ntransferee of any such State, subdivi-\nsion, instrumentality, agency, insti-\ntution, organization, or entity or of\nany such subunit,\nto which Federal financial assistance\nis extended (directly or through an-\nother entity or a person), or which\nreceives support from the extension\nof Federal financial assistance to any\nof its subunits.''. ...\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01523 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8904DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\nMR. [S TEVE ] B ARTLETT [of Texas]:\nMr. Chairman, I have an amendment\nat the desk labeled amendment No. 1\nwhich I offer at this time.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Bart-\nlett: Page 10, after line 22, insert the\nfollowing:\nSec. 6. With respect to matters re-\nlating to the performance of their of-\nficial duties, Members of Congress\nshall be deemed to be recipients of\nFederal financial assistance for pur-\nposes of section 901 of the Education\nAmendments of 1972, section 504 of\nthe Rehabilitation Act of 1973, sec-\ntion 303 of the Age Discrimination\nAct of 1975, and section 601 of the\nCivil Rights Act of 1964. ...\nMR. [P AUL] SIMON [of Illinois]: Mr.\nChairman, I renew my point of order,\nand let me say in renewing it that in\ntheory I am in agreement with the\ngentleman from Texas. I am a cospon-\nsor of a bill to cover Members of Con-\ngress under separate legislation.\nThis, however, this legislation covers\nFederal executive agencies. It does not\ncover the U.S. Congress. ...\nWhat the gentleman is attempting to\ndo is to go beyond the scope, beyond\nthe germaneness of this particular leg-\nislation, and I believe the amendment\nis not in order. ...\nMR. BARTLETT : ... Several points.\nNo. 1, section 504 does apply to execu-\ntive agencies, and that is the General\nAccounting Office.\nCongress may alreadyÐand let us\ntake it point by pointÐthe Congress\nmay already be covered in the bill's\ndefinition of recipient, which is, in\npart, ``any public or private agency, in-\nstitution, or organization to which Fed-\neral financial assistance is ex-\ntended.'' ...Congress is also, obviously a recipi-\nent and, therefore, if Congress receives\n``Federal financial assistance'' it would\nbe covered under H.R. 5490. Nowhere\nin any of the covered acts is there a\nspecific definition of ``Federal financial\nassistance,'' but Mr. Chairman, Con-\ngress obviously must pay its bills from\nsomewhere and that somewhere is the\nFederal Government, so that means\nthat there is assistance. Federal finan-\ncial assistance. ...\nMR. S IMON : ... The question is\nwhether the law up to this point has\ncovered the legislative branch. The an-\nswer is clearly that it has not.\nSo what the gentleman from Texas\nis doing is going appreciably beyond\nthe present law and the law has not\ncovered Congress for a perfectly sound\nreason, and that is the separation of\npowers. ...\nMR. [J AMES C.] W RIGHT [Jr., of\nTexas]: It seems to me that the point\nof order rests upon the well-established\nrule that an amendment is not ger-\nmane if it extends the law to cover an\nentirely separate and distinctly dif-\nferent class of people than those whom\nthe law in its initial presentation in\nthe bill would be made applicable.\nIt seems clear to me that the amend-\nment offered by the gentleman would\nindeed extend the application of that\nstatute to an entirely separate and dif-\nferent class of people. ...\nMR. [J OHN] CONYERS [Jr., of Michi-\ngan]: . .. The amendment is not ger-\nmane. The separation of powers doc-\ntrine, if we do not recognize it even\nhere in this sensitive area, we would\nbe inviting the Department of Justice\nto come in to enforce the civil rights\nlaws. We tried many times to deal with\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01524 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8905AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n12.Al Swift (Wash.).13.130 C ONG. REC. 18865, 18866, 98th\nCong. 2d Sess.this problem in other ways. For exam-\nple, the House fair employment prac-\ntices agreement is one way of creating\nthe mechanism. ...\nTHE CHAIRMAN :(12)The Chair is\nready to rule.\nIn the bill the term ``recipient''\nmeans those entities to which Federal\nassistance is extended.\nThe gentleman's amendment deems\nCongress to be a recipient of Federal\nfinancial assistance. That does not\nmean that there may not be some in-\nstances in which Congress may in fact\nreceive Federal financial assistance,\nbut it deems Congress to receive Fed-\neral financial assistance even without\nany showing whatever that in fact it\nhas that financial assistance extended\nto it.\nDoing that expands the bill from de-\nfined group in the legislation and in\nthe law today to a much different\ngroup and in that sense goes beyond\nthe scope of the legislation, and the\ngentleman's amendment is not in\norder.\nParliamentarian's Note: On a\nroll call vote of 277 yeas to 125\nnays, the Committee of the Whole\nsustained on appeal the ruling of\nthe Chair on the question of ger-\nmaneness of the amendment.\nÐAmendment To Define ``Per-\nson'' as Used in Bill To In-\nclude Unborn\n§35.67 An amendment defin-\ning a term in a bill may be\ngermane so long as it relatesto the bill and not to por-\ntions of laws being amended\nwhich are not the subject of\nthe bill; thus, to a bill clari-\nfying the definition of per-\nsons or institutions which\nmay have federal financial\nassistance terminated under\nseveral civil rights statutes\nbecause of discrimination, an\namendment providing that\nthe term ``person'' for the\npurpose of the bill shall in-\nclude unborn children was\nheld germane.\nOn June 26, 1984,(13)the Com-\nmittee of the Whole had under\nconsideration H.R. 5490, the Civil\nRights Act of 1984. The bill\namended several laws for pur-\nposes of clarifying the definition of\nrecipients of federal financial as-\nsistance (including persons) who\nengage in discrimination so as to\nbecome subject to the penalties of\nthose laws. The amendment ex-\npanded the definition of recipient\npersons to include unborn chil-\ndren from the moment of concep-\ntion, but did not effectively ex-\npand the definition of persons who\nare the objects of discrimination,\nwhatever its intent may have\nbeen, a point which was noted in\nthe remarks of Mr. Williams of\nMontana, below. Had the amend-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01525 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8906DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n14.Al Swift (Wash.).ment effectively defined the un-\nborn as possible objects of dis-\ncrimination and thus changed ex-\nisting laws in a manner not con-\ntemplated by the bill, the amend-\nment would not have been ger-\nmane.\nMR. [M ARK] S ILJANDER [of Michi-\ngan]: Mr. Chairman, I offer an amend-\nment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Sil-\njander: Page 10, after line 22, insert\nthe following:\nSec. 6. For the purposes of this\nact, the term ``person'' shall include\nunborn children from the moment of\nconception.\nMR. [P AUL] SIMON [of Illinois]: Mr.\nChairman, I make a point of order\nagainst the amendment. ...\nIt is an attempt to expand with a\nnew definition beyond the scope of this\nact. It is not germane as the previous\namendment was not germane. ...\nMR. SILJANDER : Chapter 28 of the\nprocedures of the House, section 9.12,\nsays ``. .. to a bill containing defini-\ntions of several of the terms used\ntherein, an amendment modifying one\nof the definitions and adding another\nmay be germane.\nOn page 3, on page 6 and page 8 and\npage 10 the word ``person'' is used,\nwhich is substantially different from\nthe former amendment.\nI yield to the chairman.\nTHECHAIRMAN :(14)The Chair is pre-\npared to rule.\nOn page 8, line 24, the bill uses the\nterm ``person.''In the gentleman's amendment he\nsays for the purposes of this bill the\nterm ``person'' shall, and defines the\nterm ``person'' and, therefore, the\namendment is germane. ...\nMR. [P AT] W ILLIAMS of Montana: Mr.\nChairman, I move to strike the req-\nuisite number of words. I rise in oppo-\nsition to the amendment.\nThank you, Mr. Chairman. If my in-\nformation is correct, the term ``person''\nappears four times in this act and each\ntime it appears, it refers to a person\nreceiving or distributing Federal funds.\nNow, if I understand the gentleman's\namendment, he is including children at\nthe moment of conception as those re-\nceiving or distributing Federal funds.\nWhat is the purpose of the amend-\nment? The amendment is moot. Un-\nborn children do not receive or dis-\ntribute Federal funds. The amendment\nhas no meaning.\nBill Authorizing Programs To\nIncrease Understanding of\nForeign Languages and Cul-\nturesÐAmendment To Pro-\nhibit Programs Promoting\nSecular Humanism\n§35.68 To a bill narrowly\namending the National De-\nfense Education Act of 1958\nto authorize programs to in-\ncrease understanding of for-\neign languages and cultures,\nan amendment prohibiting\nany assistance under that\nAct to any education pro-\ngram offering the ``religion of\nsecular humanism'' was con-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01526 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8907AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n15.122 C ONG. REC. 13531, 13532, 94th\nCong. 2d Sess.\n16.A bill to amend the Higher Edu-\ncation Act of 1965. 17.James C. Wright, Jr. (Tex.).strued as a restriction on\nother programs under that\nAct not amended by the\npending bill and was held to\nbe not germane.\nOn May 12, 1976,(15)during con-\nsideration of H.R. 12851(16)in the\nCommittee of the Whole, the\nChair sustained a point of order\nagainst an amendment holding\nthat to a bill amending various\nlaws relating primarily to higher\neducation, an amendment to a law\nbeing amended by the bill, but af-\nfecting programs under that law\ndealing with other levels of edu-\ncation was beyond the scope of the\npending bill and in violation of\nRule XVI clause 7.\nMR. [J OHN B.] C ONLAN [of Arizona]:\nMr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr.\nConlan: On page 86, between lines 6\nand 7, add the following new sub-\nsection:\n``(d) No grant, contract, or support\nis authorized under this Act for any\neducational program, curriculum re-\nsearch and development, adminis-\ntrator-teacher orientation, or any\nproject involving one or more stu-\ndents or teacher-administrator in-\nvolving any aspect of the religion of\nsecular humanism. ...\nMR. [J AMES G.] O'H ARA [of Michi-\ngan]: . .. The amendment as offeredsays, ``grant, contract, or support is au-\nthorized under this act,'' and in the\ncontext in which it is offered the gen-\ntleman from Arizona would apply it to\nall of the parts of the National Defense\nEducation Act because he inserts it on\npage 86 between lines 6 and 7, which\nis all of it, as an amendment of section\n603 of the National Defense Education\nAct. So he goes very considerably be-\nyond the scope of the provisions of the\nsection he offers to amend or, for that\nmatter, he goes beyond the scope of the\nhigher education laws that are amend-\ned by this particular bill. Therefore,\nhis amendment is not germane. ...\nMR. CONLAN : ... I think the gen-\ntleman is construing it in a very un-\nnecessary and narrow area, Mr. Chair-\nman. We are dealing here with the Na-\ntional Defense Education Act. We are\ndealing with an enlargement of it. We\nare dealing with a whole broadened\narea of financing as part of that whole\nact. I think the amendment is quite\ngermane, and legal counsel has ad-\nvised us that it is.\nTHECHAIRMAN :(17)The Chair is pre-\npared to rule.\nThe amendment offered by the gen-\ntleman from Arizona appears in sec-\ntion 201, all of which consists of an\namendment to the National Defense\nEducation Act of 1958. The material\ncontained in the bill amends that act\nvery narrowly only to the extent of pro-\nviding for specialists and persons\ntrained in languages and foreign cul-\ntures. By contrast, the amendment of-\nfered by the gentleman from Arizona\nwould appear to amend the totality of\nthe National Defense Education Act of\n1958 and impose its restrictions upon\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01527 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8908DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n18.H.R. 4761 (Committee on Banking\nand Currency).\n19.92 C ONG. REC. 1990, 79th Cong. 2d\nSess., Mar. 6, 1946.20.Jere Cooper (Tenn.).\n1.92 C ONG. REC. 1991, 79th Cong. 2d\nSess., Mar. 6, 1946.any grant or contract or funds under\nthat act which under other titles of\nthat law could go to schools of sec-\nondary and other levels of education.\nFor this reason the Chair believes\nthat the amendment as drafted and of-\nfered by the gentleman from Arizona\n(Mr. Conlan) expressly making ref-\nerence to ``no grant, contract, or sup-\nport as authorized under this act'',\nthereby referring to the National De-\nfense Education Act of 1958 and not to\nthe pending bill, is beyond the scope of\nthe bill and, therefore, not germane to\nthe language of the bill.\nFair Prices for HousingÐ\nAmendment To Prohibit Dis-\ncrimination\n§35.69 To a bill adding a new\ntitle to the National Housing\nAct to insure availability of\nhousing at fair prices,\namendments to add a section\nto the act to prohibit, in the\nadministration of the act,\nany discrimination on ac-\ncount of race, creed, or the\nlike were held not germane.\nIn the 79th Congress, during\nconsideration of a bill(18)relating\nto housing stabilization, the fol-\nlowing amendment was of-\nfered:(19)\nAmendment offered by Mr. Dirksen:\nOn page 17, after line 6, insert a new\nsection, as follows:Sec. 711. In the administration of\nthe National Housing Act as amend-\ned and the United States Housing\nAct of 1937 as amended and in mak-\ning available the benefits of said acts\nas amended, there shall be no dis-\ncrimination on account of race, creed,\ncolor, or national origin, and in addi-\ntion thereto maximum preferences\nand priorities shall be secured to vet-\nerans of World War II and their im-\nmediate families.\nMr. Brent Spence, of Kentucky,\nmade the point of order that the\namendment was not germane to\nthe bill. The Chairman,(20)in rul-\ning on the point of order, stated:\n... Obviously, the gentleman's\namendment is much too broad to come\nwithin the purview of the pending bill.\nThe amendment relates to the Na-\ntional Housing Act as amended, the\nUnited States Housing Act of 1937, as\namended. The point of order is sus-\ntained.\nMr. Everett M. Dirksen, of Illi-\nnois, then offered the amendment,\ndeleting the reference to the\nUnited States Housing Act of\n1937.(1)Mr. Spence again raised a\npoint of order. In defense of the\namendment, Mr. Dirksen stated:\nClearly, Mr. Chairman, the bill be-\nfore us is nothing more than an addi-\ntional developing of the National Hous-\ning Act, it amends the entire act in\nmany particulars. So the amendment\nbefore us now relates only to the Hous-\ning Act which is presently covered by\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01528 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8909AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n2.H.R. 6659 (Committee on Banking\nand Currency).\n3.See the Talle amendment at 103\nCONG. REC. 6621±23, 85th Cong. 1st\nSess., May 8, 1957.\n4.Id. at p. 6622. 5.Id. at p. 6629.the bill and is very definitely before\nthe Committee of the Whole.\nThe Chairman then stated:\nThe gentleman's amendment would\ntake in entirely different provisions of\nthe Housing Act than that contained in\nthe pending bill.\nThe point of order is sustained.\nAmendment and Amendment\nThereto Modifying Same Sec-\ntion of Law\n§35.70 Where an amendment\nto a bill proposes modifica-\ntion of a section of existing\nlaw in some respects, an\namendment to the amend-\nment may properly propose\nmodification of the same sec-\ntion of the law in similar re-\nspects.\nIn the 85th Congress, during\nconsideration of a bill(2)to extend\nand amend laws relating to im-\nprovement of housing, an amend-\nment was offered(3)which in part\nrelated to authorization of pay-\nments to parties in lieu of those\nmoving expenses occasioned by\ncertain urban projects. The\namendment stated in part:(4)\nSec. 302. Section 106(f)(2) of the\nHousing Act of 1949 is amended byadding at the end thereof the following\nnew sentence: ``Such rules and regula-\ntions may include provisions author-\nizing payment to individuals and fami-\nlies of fixed amounts (not to exceed\n$100 in any case) in lieu of their re-\nspective reasonable and necessary\nmoving expenses.''\nAn amendment offered to such\namendment stated as follows:(5)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [Barratt]\nO'Hara of Illinois to the amendment of-\nfered by Mr. Talle: Amend section 302\nto read as follows:\nSec. 302. Section 106(f)(2) of the\nHousing Act of 1949 is amended (1)\nby striking out $2,000 and inserting\nin lieu thereof $3,000; and (2) by\nadding at the end thereof the fol-\nlowing sentence: Such rules and reg-\nulations may include provisions au-\nthorizing the payment to individuals,\nfamilies, and business concerns of\nfixed amounts not to exceed $100 in\nthe case of an individual or family,\nor $3,000 in the case of any business\nconcern in lieu of the respective rea-\nsonable and necessary moving ex-\npenses.\nThe purpose of the amendment\nwas explained as follows:\nMR. O'H ARA [of Illinois]: . .. It hap-\npens that in the district that I rep-\nresent we have in the operation of the\nurban-renewal program the displace-\nment of many long-established mer-\nchants. . .. It is not right that these\nsmall-business tenants should be\nforced to assume this burden when\ntheir moving is not for their own profit\nor convenience, but to the contrary.\n... The present law calls for moving\nexpenses up to $2,000. In some cases\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01529 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8910DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n6.Wilbur D. Mills (Ark.).\n7.For a similar ruling during pro-\nceedings relating to H.R. 6659, see\nSec. 35.71, infra.8.H.R. 6659 (Committee on Banking\nand Currency).\n9.103 C ONG. REC. 6703, 85th Cong. 1st\nSess., May 9, 1957.\n10.Id. at p. 6706.that is ruinously inadequate. We are\nasking that the amount be increased to\n$3,000 to be paid only in cases where\nthe circumstances warrant. ...\nThe following point of order was\nraised by Mr. Henry O. Talle, of\nIowa, against the amendment:\nMr. Chairman, the amendment of\nthe gentleman from Illinois [Mr.\nO'Hara] is not germane to my amend-\nment. As I understand his amendment\n... it refers to basic law. His amend-\nment, in order to be germane, would\nhave to be germane to my amendment\nwhich is under consideration.\nThe Chairman,(6)in ruling on\nthe point of order, stated:\nSection 302 is an amendment of ex-\nisting law contained in section 106(f)(2)\nof the Housing Act of 1949. That lan-\nguage presumably is germane to sec-\ntion 106(f)(2). That being the case, the\namendment opens the entire section of\nthe basic law, section 106(f)(2), to\namendment, which is the purpose, in\npart, of the amendment offered by the\ngentleman from Illinois [Mr. O'Hara].\nTherefore, it is the opinion of the\nChair that the amendment offered by\nthe gentleman from Illinois is ger-\nmane. The Chair overrules the point of\norder.(7)\n§35.71 To an amendment in\nthe nature of a substitute,\nproposing, in part, modifica-\ntion of a section of the Hous-ing Act of 1949 relating to\npayments for certain ex-\npenses occasioned by urban\nrenewal projects, a propo-\nsition to further amend such\nsection by limiting specified\nconstruction to that needed\nfor relocation of families dis-\nplaced by urban renewal\nprojects was held to be ger-\nmane.\nIn the 85th Congress, during\nproceedings relating to a bill(8)to\nextend and amend laws concerned\nwith the improvement of housing,\nan amendment in the nature of a\nsubstitute was under consider-\nation which contained the fol-\nlowing provision:(9)\nSec. 302. Section 106(f)(2) of the\nHousing Act of 1949 is amended by\nadding at the end thereof the following\nnew sentence: ``Such rules and regula-\ntions may include provisions author-\nizing payment to individuals and fami-\nlies of fixed amounts (not to exceed\n$100 in any case) in lieu of their re-\nspective reasonable and necessary\nmoving expenses.''\nThe following amendment was\noffered to such amendment:(10)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [O.\nClark] Fisher [of Texas] to the sub-\nstitute offered by Mr. [Edmond A.]\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01530 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8911AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n11.Id. at pp. 6706, 6707.12.Wilbur D. Mills (Ark.).\n13.103 C ONG. REC. 6707, 85th Cong. 1st\nSess., May 9, 1957. For a similar rul-\ning during proceedings relating to\nH.R. 6659, see §35.70, supra. It\nshould be noted that in both rulings\nthe text being amended was a com-\nprehensive amendment of one or\nmore sections of existing law.Edmondson [of Oklahoma]: Page 11, in\nline 12 insert ``(a)'' after ``sec. 302.'' and\nafter line 18 insert the following:\n(b) Section 106 of such act is fur-\nther amended by adding at the end\nthereof the following new subsection:\n``(g) No new contract . .. or other\narrangement regarding low-rent\nhousing provided for under section\n305 of the Housing Act of 1949 shall\nbe entered into . .. except with re-\nspect to low-rent housing projects to\nbe undertaken in a community in\nwhich the local governing body cer-\ntifies that such low-rent housing\nproject is needed for the relocation of\nfamilies to be displaced as a result of\nFederal, State, or local governmental\naction in such community: And pro-\nvided further, That no such new con-\ntracts . .. or other arrangements\nshall be entered into . .. for addi-\ntional dwelling units in excess of the\ntotal number of such units which the\nHousing and Home Finance Admin-\nistrator determines to be needed for\nthe relocation of families to be dis-\nplaced as a result of Federal, State,\nor local governmental action in the\ncommunities where such units are to\nbe located.''\nA point of order was raised\nagainst the Fisher amendment, as\nfollows:(11)\nMR. [A BRAHAM J.] M ULTER [of New\nYork]: Mr. Chairman, I make a point\nof order against the amendment, that\nit is not germane to the amendment\nbefore the House or the bill before the\nHouse or any part of the bill or the\npending amendment. ...\nThe amendment deals with public\nhousing. There is no public housing in\nany part of this bill or in any part of\nthe amendment to the bill.The Chairman(12)overruled the\npoint of order, citing the principle\nthat, ``an amendment to a par-\nticular section may perhaps make\nin order another amendment to\nthe section.''(13)\nCommittee Jurisdiction as Test\nWhere Amendments to Law\nAre Within Jurisdiction of\nDifferent Committees\n§35.72 Committee jurisdiction\nis a relevant test of germane-\nness where the pending por-\ntion of the bill amends a law\nentirely within one commit-\ntee's jurisdiction and the\nproposed amendment\namends a law within another\ncommittee's jurisdiction;\nthus, to a title of an omnibus\nhousing bill amending a law\nwithin the jurisdiction of the\nCommittee on Banking, Fi-\nnance and Urban Affairs to\nreauthorize rural housing\nloan and grant programs, an\namendment to another law\nwithin the jurisdiction of the\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01531 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8912DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n14.H.R. 11689 (Committee on Banking\nand Currency).\n15.See 80 C ONG. REC. 4439, 74th Cong.\n2d Sess., Mar. 26, 1936. 16.Id. at p. 4444.Committee on Agriculture\nauthorizing the pooling of\nfederally guaranteed rural\nhousing loans was held not\ngermane as amending a law\nnot amended by the pending\ntitle and within the jurisdic-\ntion of another committee.\nThe proceedings of July 31,\n1990, relating to H.R. 1180, the\nHousing and Community Develop-\nment Act, are discussed in § 4.58,\nsupra.\nAmendment Modifying Same\nSection of National Housing\nAct in Unrelated Respects\n§35.73 To that part of a bill\namending a section of the\nNational Housing Act by add-\ning a paragraph relating to\nthe power of the adminis-\ntrator to dispose of securities\nheld by him, an amendment\nproposing to modify such\nsection of the act in other re-\nspects was held not germane.\nIn the 74th Congress, a bill(14)\nwas under consideration to amend\na title of the National Housing\nAct. The bill stated in part:(15)\nBe it enacted, etc., That title I of the\nNational Housing Act, as amended, be\nfurther amended as follows:Section 1 of title I is amended by\nadding at the end of said section the\nfollowing paragraph:\n``Notwithstanding any other provi-\nsion of law, the Administrator shall\nhave the power, under and subject to\nregulations prescribed by him and\napproved by the Secretary of the\nTreasury, to assign or sell at public\nor private sale, or otherwise dispose\nof, any evidence of debt, contract\nclaim, property, or security assigned\nto or held by him, and to collect or\ncompromise all obligations assigned\nto or held by him and all legal or eq-\nuitable rights accruing to him in con-\nnection with the payment of insur-\nance under section 2 of this title,\nuntil such time as such obligations\nmay be referred to the Attorney Gen-\neral for suit or collection.''\nThe following amendment was\noffered:(16)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [Carl E.]\nMapes [of Michigan]: Page 1, after line\n4, strike out after the word ``compensa-\ntion'', in the second sentence of section\n1 of title I, the rest of the sentence and\ninsert in lieu thereof the following:\n``said officers and employees to be ap-\npointed in accordance with the civil-\nservice laws and rules thereunder and\ntheir compensation fixed as provided in\nthe Classification Act of 1923, as\namended''. ...\nA point of order was raised\nagainst the amendment, as fol-\nlows:\nMR. [T. A LAN] G OLDSBOROUGH [of\nMaryland]: Mr. Chairman, I make a\npoint of order against the amendment\nthat it is not germane. ...\nMr. Chairman, the matter desired to\nbe inserted by the gentleman from\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01532 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8913AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n17.Emmet O'Neal (Ky.).18.H.R. 11308 (Committee on Education\nand Labor).\n19.114 C ONG. REC. 4348, 90th Cong. 2d\nSess., Feb. 27, 1968.Michigan does not refer in any way to\nthe subject matter of the legislation. It\nhas no possible reference to the subject\nmatter of the legislation.\nThe Chairman(17)stated, ``sec-\ntion 1 of this bill deals with the\nsale and handling of securities.''\nMr. Mapes responded that,\n``[S]ection 1 of the law relates to\nappointment of employees and the\nfixing of their compensation,\nwhich is the section I am trying to\namend.'' The Chairman then cited\na prior ruling by Speaker Fred-\nerick H. Gillett, of Massachusetts,\nthat, ``to a bill amendatory of an\nact in several particulars an\namendment proposing to modify\nthe act, but not relating to the bill\n(is not) germane,'' and held as fol-\nlows:\nIt seems very clear to the Chair that\nthe amendment offered by the gen-\ntleman from Michigan does attempt to\nmodify a section of the existing law,\nbut it is not germane to this particular\nsection of the bill. The point of order,\ntherefore, is sustained.\nBill Amending National Foun-\ndation for the Arts and Hu-\nmanities ActÐAmendment To\nEstablish Office of Poet Lau-\nreate\n§35.74 To a bill amending sev-\neral sections of the National\nFoundation for the Arts andHumanities Act to extend the\nauthorization for appropria-\ntions and redefine certain\npowers of the Foundation, an\namendment proposing to fur-\nther amend the act to estab-\nlish an office of Poet Lau-\nreate of the United States\nwas held to be not germane.\nIn the 90th Congress, during\nconsideration of a bill(18)amend-\ning the National Foundation for\nthe Arts and Humanities Act of\n1965, the following amendment\nwas offered:(19)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [Spark\nM.] Matsunaga [of Hawaii]: ...\nSec. 7. The National Foundation on\nthe Arts and the Humanities Act of\n1965 is amended by adding at the end\nthereof the following new section:\nPOETLAUREATE OF THE UNITED\nSTATES\nSec. 15. (a) There is hereby estab-\nlished the Office of Poet Laureate of\nthe United States. ...\n(b) The Poet Laureate . .. who\nshall be appointed by the President\nafter consideration of the rec-\nommendations of the National Coun-\ncil on the Arts, shall be a poet whose\nworks reflect those qualities . .. as-\nsociated with the historical heritage,\npresent achievement, and future po-\ntential of these United States.\nMr. Frank Thompson, Jr., of\nNew Jersey, made the point of\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01533 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8914DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n20.John A. Young (Tex.).\n1.114 C ONG. REC. 4349, 90th Cong. 2d\nSess., Feb. 27, 1968.\n2.H.R. 7474 (Committee on Public\nWorks).\n3.101 C ONG. REC. 11709, 84th Cong.\n1st Sess., July 27, 1955.4.Eugene J. Keogh (N.Y.).\n5.101 C ONG. REC. 11710, 84th Cong.\n1st Sess., July 27, 1955.order that the amendment was\nnot germane to the bill. The\nChairman,(20)without elaboration,\nsustained the point of order.(1)\nBill To Amend Federal Aid\nRoad ActÐAmendment To\nCreate Corporation With Au-\nthority Affecting Road Con-\nstruction\n§35.75 To a bill to amend and\nsupplement the Federal Aid\nRoad Act, an amendment\nproposing the creation of a\ncorporation with authority\nto issue bonds to finance\nroad construction was held\nnot germane.\nIn the 84th Congress, during\nconsideration of a bill(2)to amend\nand supplement the Federal Aid\nRoad Act, the following amend-\nment was offered:(3)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [Charles\nA.] Halleck [of Indiana]: Page 8, after\nline 6 insert:\nSec. 2 (G) (a) There is hereby cre-\nated, subject to the direction and su-\npervision of the President, a body\ncorporate to be known as the Inter-\nstate and Defense Highway Finance\nCorporation. ...(c) It shall be the duty of the Cor-\nporation (a) to receive and borrow\nfunds, (b) to provide and make avail-\nable to the Secretary such sums as\nare necessary to permit him to make\nthe payments or advances to the\nStates, through the established\nchannels of the Bureau of Public\nRoads of the Federal share of the\ncost of construction of projects on the\nInterstate System, and such other\ncosts or expenses as are permitted or\nrequired to be paid or advanced by\nhim in connection with the Inter-\nstate System under the terms of this\nact, and (c) to perform such other du-\nties as may be required in the per-\nformance of its functions and the ex-\nercise of its powers under this\nact. ...\nMr. Robert E. Jones, Jr., of Ala-\nbama, made the point of order\nagainst the amendment that it\nwas not germane to the bill. The\nChairman,(4)in ruling on the\npoint of order, stated:(5)\nIt is . .. the opinion of the Chair\nthat the amendment offered by the\ngentleman from Indiana, seeking as it\ndoes to create an entirely different\nbody, a body corporate, is not germane\nto the provisions of the pending bill.\nÐAmendment To Prohibit\nFunds for States Where Seg-\nregation is Practiced\n§35.76 To a bill to amend and\nsupplement the Federal Aid\nRoad Act, an amendment\nproviding that no funds col-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01534 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8915AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n6.H.R. 7474 (Committee on Public\nWorks).\n7.See 101 C ONG. R EC. 11710, 84th\nCong. 1st Sess., July 27, 1955.8.Eugene J. Keogh (N.Y.).\n9.S. 2208 (Committee on Interstate\nand Foreign Commerce).lected under the act may be\navailable to any state or lo-\ncality in which segregation is\npracticed in restaurants,\nrestrooms, or in road con-\nstruction was held to be ger-\nmane.\nIn the 84th Congress, during\nconsideration of a bill(6)to amend\nand supplement the Federal Aid\nRoad Act, an amendment was of-\nfered as described above.(7)Mr.\nRobert E. Jones, Jr., of Alabama,\nmade the point of order against\nthe amendment that it was not\ngermane. In defending the amend-\nment, the proponent, Mr. Earl\nWilson, of Indiana, stated:\n... The Court has ruled against\nsegregation. Here we are authorizing\nthis great appropriation, under which\nwe are going to spend billions of dol-\nlars in every State in the Union. Yet,\nthere are some States in which the Ne-\ngroes are not going to have a chance to\nwork and earn part of this money to\npay the taxes to build the high-\nways. ...\n... I think these Negroes should be\ngiven the opportunity to help build the\nhighways because they are going to\nhelp to pay the taxes. I think they\nshould be able to use the facilities, the\nrestaurants, and the comfort stations,\nand so forth, that appear along the\nhighways.The Chairman,(8)in ruling on\nthe point of order, stated:\nIt is the opinion of the Chair that\nsince the amendment refers to and\ntouches upon the funds collected under\nthis act, limiting their use, the amend-\nment is germane, therefore, the Chair\noverrules the point of order.\nFunds for Alaska and Hawaii\nUnder Federal Airport ActÐ\nFunds for Puerto Rico and\nVirgin Islands\n§35.77 To a bill amending one\nsection of the Federal Air-\nport Act to provide that the\nnew States Alaska and Ha-\nwaii be eligible for certain\nfunds under the act, an\namendment to make Puerto\nRico and the Virgin Islands\nsimilarly eligible and to\namend other provisions of\nthe Act was held to be not\ngermane.\nIn the 86th Congress, a bill(9)\nwas under consideration to pro-\nvide that Alaska and Hawaii be\neligible for participation in the\ndistribution of discretionary funds\nunder a particular section of the\nFederal Airport Act. An amend-\nment was offered by Mr. John B.\nBennett, of Michigan. The bill\nwith a committee amendment,\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01535 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8916DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n10.105 C ONG. REC. 18840, 18841, 86th\nCong. 1st Sess., Sept. 9, 1959.and Mr. Bennett's amendment in\nthe form of a substitute for the\ncommittee amendment, were as\nfollows:(10)\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nBe it enacted by the Senate and\nHouse of Representatives of the\nUnited States of America in Congress\nassembled, That paragraph (2) of\nsection 6(b) of the Federal Airport\nAct (69 Stat. 442, 49 U.S.C. 1105) is\namended to read as follows:\n``(2) Such discretionary fund shall\nbe available for such approved\nprojects in the several States, Alas-\nka, and Hawaii as the Administrator\nmay deem most appropriate. ...''\nWith the following committee\namendment:\nStrike out all after the enacting\nclause and insert: ``That paragraph\n(2) of section 6(b) of the Federal Air-\nport Act (49 U.S.C. sec. 1105(b)(2)) is\namended to read as follows:\n```(2) Such discretionary fund shall\nbe available for such approved\nprojects in the several States, Alas-\nka, and Hawaii as the Administrator\nmay deem most appropriate for car-\nrying out the national airport plan,\nregardless of the location of such\nprojects. The Administrator shall\ngive consideration, in determining\nthe projects for which such fund is to\nbe so used, to the existing airport fa-\ncilities in the several States, Alaska,\nand Hawaii, and to the need for or\nlack of development of airport facili-\nties in the several States, Alaska,\nand Hawaii.' ''\nMR. B ENNETT of Michigan: Mr.\nChairman, I offer a substitute amend-\nment, which is at the Clerk's desk.\nThe Clerk read as follows:Amendment offered by Mr. Ben-\nnett of Michigan as a substitute for\nthe committee amendment: Page 2,\nstrike out lines 6 through 18, inclu-\nsive, and insert in lieu thereof the\nfollowing: ``That section 2(a) of the\nFederal Airport Act, as amended (49\nU.S.C., sec. 1101(a)), is amended as\nfollows:\n``(1) In paragraph (7), strike out\n`Alaska, Hawaii, or Puerto Rico and'\nand insert in lieu thereof `Puerto\nRico, or'. ...\n``Sec. 3. Section 5 of such Act, as\namended (49 U.S.C., sec. 1104), is\namended as follows: ...\n``(2) In subsection (b), insert `(1)'\nimmediately after `(b)'. ...\n``(5) At the end of such subsection\n(b), add the following new para-\ngraph:\n```(2) For the purpose of carrying\nout this Act with respect to projects\nin Puerto Rico and the Virgin Is-\nlands, there are hereby authorized to\nbe obligated by the execution of\ngrant agreements pursuant to sec-\ntion 12 the sum of $900,000 for each\nof the fiscal years ending June 30,\n1960, and June 30, 1961. Each such\nauthorized amount shall become\navailable for obligation beginning\nJuly 1 of the fiscal year for which it\nis authorized and shall continue to\nbe so available until so obligated. Of\nthe sum of $900,000 authorized by\nthis paragraph for each of the fiscal\nyears ending June 30, 1960, and\nJune 30, 1961, the sum of $600,000\nshall be available for projects in\nPuerto Rico and the sum of $300,000\nshall be available for projects in the\nVirgin Islands.' ''\nA point of order against the\namendment having been raised by\nMr. Oren Harris, of Arkansas, the\nfollowing ruling was made by\nChairman John A. Blatnik, of\nMinnesota:\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01536 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8917AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n11.124 C ONG. REC. 29487, 29488, 95th\nCong. 2d Sess.\n12.The Aircraft Noise Reduction Act.The bill before the House deals with\nparagraph 2 of section 6(b). The sub-\nstitute deals with other portions of the\nact and also deals with Puerto Rico\nand the Virgin Islands, which are not\nin the present act. The point of order is\nwell taken, and the Chair sustains the\npoint of order.\nDiverse Amendments to Airport\nand Airway Development\nActÐAmendment Adding New\nTitle to Bill\n§35.78 A bill comprehensively\namending several sections of\nexisting law may be suffi-\nciently broad in scope to\nadmit as germane an amend-\nment which is germane to\nanother section of that law\nnot amended by the bill;\nthus, to a bill containing sev-\neral titles amending the Air-\nport and Airway Develop-\nment Act in diverse respects,\nincluding provisions relating\nto aircraft noise reduction\ngrants, regulation and fund-\ning, general airport develop-\nment projects, and general\nresearch, development and\ndemonstration grants, an\namendment adding a new\ntitle amending the Act to ex-\ntend the authorization for\nState Airport Demonstration\nGrants was held germane.On Sept. 14, 1978,(11)during\nconsideration of H.R. 8729(12)in\nthe Committee of the Whole,\nChairman Gerry E. Studds, of\nMassachusetts, overruled a point\nof order against the following\namendment:\nMR. [W ILLIAM H.] H ARSHA [of Ohio]:\nMr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr.\nHarsha: At the end of the bill, add\nthe following new title:\nTITLE VI\nSec. 601. Paragraph (4) of section\n28(c) of the Airport and Airway De-\nvelopment Act of 1970 is amended by\nstriking out ``September 30, 1978''\nand inserting in lieu thereof ``Sep-\ntember 30, 1980''. ...\nMR. [M. G.] S NYDER [of Kentucky]:\nMr. Chairman, I just heard about this\namendment a few minutes ago. While\nI support what they want to do in this,\nit is a different program that comes\nout of different legislation. It is an in-\nnovative program that we started last\nyear for demonstration projects for, I\nbelieve it was, four States to handle\nthe State money themselves rather\nthan going through FAA with a direct\nfunding to the States. They make all\nthe decisions. They set all the criteria.\nIt is a program that is not dealt with\nin this bill in any way, shape, or form,\nand in my opinion is not germane to\nthis bill. ...\nMR. H ARSHA : Mr. Chairman, I be-\nlieve it is germane to the issue. It is a\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01537 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8918DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n13.Committee amendment to H.R. 8902\n(Committee on Interstate and For-\neign Commerce).\n14.See 102 C ONG. R EC. 14868, 84th\nCong. 2d Sess., July 26, 1956.section that is in the Airport and Air-\nway Development Act. We already\nhave other titles in this bill dealing\nwith the Airport and Airway Develop-\nment Act, the so-called AADA. This\ndeals with that part of the program\nand I think it is germane to the title of\nthe bill. ...\nTHECHAIRMAN : The Chair is pre-\npared to rule.\nThe bill before us amends the Air-\nport and Airway Development Act in\nseveral respects and with some depth\nand breadth. It deals not only with\nnoise control, but planning, grants and\nresearch, and in other ways.\nTherefore, the Chair feels the\namendment of the gentleman from\nOhio (Mr. Harsha) is germane to the\nbill as a whole and the point of order\nis overruled.\nTax Consequences of Sale of\nProperty by Air CarriersÐDe-\ntermination of Subsidies for\nAir Carriers\n§35.79 To a bill amending the\nCivil Aeronautics Act of 1938\nin part to exclude from speci-\nfied tax computations those\ngains from the sale of prop-\nerty of an air carrier that are\nsubsequently reinvested in\nsimilar property, an amend-\nment was held to be not ger-\nmane which sought to relate\nsuch accounting procedures\nto the determination of cer-\ntain subsidies for air car-\nriers.In the 84th Congress, the fol-\nlowing proposition(13)was under\nconsideration:(14)\n... That section 406(b) of the Civil\nAeronautics Act of 1938, as amended\n(49 U.S.C. 486), is amended by insert-\ning ``(1)'' after ``(b)'' and by adding at\nthe end thereof the following:\n(2) In determining ``all other rev-\nenue'' of an air carrier for the pur-\nposes of paragraph (1), the BoardÐ\n(A) shall not take into account any\nloss on the sale or other disposition\nof property, and\n(B) shall not take into account any\ngain on the sale or other disposition\nof property, if the net gain (after ap-\nplicable taxes) is (within a reason-\nable time to be fixed and determined\nby the Board) reinvested in other\nproperty similar or related in service\nor use.\nFor the purposes of this para-\ngraph, the term ``property'' means\ndepreciable property used or useful\nin the carrier's normal oper-\nations. ...\nThe following amendment was\noffered:\nAmendment offered by Mr. [John W.]\nHeselton [of Massachusetts]: Page 2,\nline 11, strike out all of lines 11\nthrough 22, inclusive, and insert in\nplace thereof the following: ...\n(3) Hereafter in determining that\nportion of the carrier's mail rate\nwhich is payable by the Board\n(which portion is hereinafter referred\nto as ``subsidy'') the Board shall com-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01538 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8919AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n15.Francis E. Walter (Pa.). 16.The ConRail Authorization Act.pute such carrier's depreciation ex-\npense and return on investment\nafter first deducting the net gains\nnot taken into account in deter-\nmining all other revenue of such car-\nrier from the original cost to such\ncarrier of the flight equipment in\nwhich such net gains have been rein-\nvested. ...\nMr. Oren Harris, of Arkansas,\nin making a point of order against\nthe amendment, stated, ``The\namendment . .. goes far beyond\nthe scope of this bill.'' In defend-\ning the amendment, the pro-\nponent, Mr. Heselton stated:\n...I would like to refer . .. to a\nruling . .. found in Cannon's Prece-\ndents, section 2993. . .. It is as fol-\nlows:\nAn amendment to a section which\nis relevant to the subject matter and\nwhich may be said to be properly\nand logically suggested in the per-\nfecting of the section and the car-\nrying out of the intent of the bill\nwould be germane to the bill and\nthus is in order.\nThe Chairman,(15)in ruling on\nthe point of order, stated:\nThe amendment offered by the gen-\ntleman from Massachusetts extends\nbeyond the scope of the language con-\ntained in section 406(a) at lines 13 and\n14 of the committee amendment.\nThe language therein contained is\nvery narrow in its scope and applies to\none specific phase of the operation.\nThe amendment offered by the gen-\ntleman from Massachusetts extends\nbeyond loss on the sale of property, the\nmatter contained in the amendment;therefore, the entire amendment of-\nfered by the gentleman from Massa-\nchusetts is not germane and the Chair\nsustains the point of order. ...\nFederal Funding of Rail-\nroadsÐAmendment Affecting\nFreight Rate Regulations\n§35.80 A proposal which may\namend existing law in sev-\neral respects but which is\nconfined to the issue of fed-\neral financial assistance does\nnot necessarily permit, as\ngermane, amendments to\nother sections of that law\nwhich involve federal regula-\ntions governing the entities\nbeing financed by the bill;\nthus, to a proposition amend-\ning existing laws in several\nrespects but limited in scope\nto the issue of federal fund-\ning of railroads, an amend-\nment to one of those laws to\nrequire any railroad to main-\ntain certain freight rate\npractices and waiving provi-\nsions of antitrust laws to per-\nmit enforcement of those\nrate practices was held not\ngermane as addressing regu-\nlatory authorities in law and\nnot confined to the issue of\nfederal financial assistance.\nDuring consideration of H.R.\n12161(16)in the Committee of the\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01539 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8920DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n17.124 C ONG. R EC. 38671, 38672,\n38677, 38678, 95th Cong. 2d Sess.Whole on Oct. 14, 1978,(17)the\nChair sustained a point of order\nagainst the amendment described\nabove. The proceedings were as\nfollows:\nMR. [F RED B.] R OONEY [of Pennsyl-\nvania]: Mr. Chairman, I offer an\namendment in the nature of a sub-\nstitute.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment in the nature of a\nsubstitute offered by Mr. Rooney:\nStrike out all after the enacting\nclause and insert in lieu thereof the\nfollowing:\nThat this Act may be cited as the\n``United States Railway Association\nAmendments Act of 1978''.\nSec. 2. (a) Section 216(a) of the Re-\ngional Rail Reorganization Act of\n1973 (45 U.S.C. 726(a)) is amended\nby striking out ``$1,100,000,000'' and\ninserting in lieu thereof\n``$2,300,000,000''.\n(b) Section 216(b)(2) of such Act\n(45 U.S.C. 716(b)(2)) is amended by\nstriking out ``$1,100,000,000'' and in-\nserting in lieu thereof\n``$2,300,000,000''.\n(c) Section 216(f) of such Act (45\nU.S.C. 726(f)) is amended by striking\nout ``$2,100,000,000'' and inserting in\nlieu thereof ``$3,300,000,000''.\nSec. 3. Section 216 of the Regional\nRail Reorganization Act of 1973 (45\nU.S.C. 726) is further amended by\nredesignating subsection (f) thereof\nas subsection (g) and by inserting\nimmediately after subsection (e)\nthereof a new subsection as follows:\n``(g)(1) The Association shall not\ninvest the final $345,000,000 of the\nadditional investment in the Cor-\nporation authorized by the RegionalRail Reorganization Act Amend-\nments of 1978 unless and until (A)\nthe Corporation has in effect an em-\nployee stock ownership plan which\nsatisfies the requirements of para-\ngraphs (2) and (3), and (B) the re-\nquirements of the other paragraphs\nof this subsection have been satis-\nfied. ...\nMR. [J OHN M.] M URPHY of New\nYork: Mr. Speaker, I offer an amend-\nment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Mur-\nphy of New York: Page 2, after line\n6 insert the following and renumber\nthe remaining paragraphs as appro-\npriate.\n``Sec. II. Section 3 of the Interstate\nCommerce Act (49 U.S.C. 3) is\namended by adding at the end there-\nof the following new paragraph:\n``(6)(a) It shall be the duty of any\nClass I of common carrier by rail-\nroad which handles or controls more\nthan 75 per centum of the rail\nfreight traffic to and from a port to\nestablish and maintain equal rates,\ncharges, tariffs, and classifications to\nand from all points served by rail\nwithin such port, and to establish\nand maintain equal joint routes,\nrates, charges, tariffs, and classifica-\ntions for all types of rail freight traf-\nfic with all connecting rail carriers to\nand from all points served by rail\nwithin the port. It shall be the duty\nof each such Class I common carrier\nby railroad establishing through\nroutes to provide reasonable facili-\nties for operating such routes and to\nmake reasonable rules and regula-\ntions with respect to their operation\nand providing for reasonable com-\npensation to those entitled thereto,\nand, in case of joint rates, charges,\nor tariffs, to establish just, reason-\nable, and equitable divisions thereof,\nwhich shall not unduly prefer or\nprejudice any participating car-\nrier. ...\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01540 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8921AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n18.George E. Brown, Jr. (Calif.).MS. [B ARBARA A.] M IKULSKI [of\nMaryland]: Mr. Chairman, I make a\npoint of order against the bill on the\ngrounds that the amendment is not\ngermane because the amendment\namends the Interstate Commerce Act\nand the Clayton Antitrust Act.\nMr. Chairman, the amendment in\nthe nature of a substitute is basically\nan authorization; it authorizes USRA\nto purchase ConRail securities. The\namendment offered by the gentleman\nfrom New York (Mr. Murphy) not only\namends these two statutes, but also\nmakes new policy concerning intraport\nequalization. The bill is not a policy\noriented bill dealing with the Inter-\nstate Commerce Act, but is rather es-\nsentially an authorization bill, by far,\nand I think it is not germane. ...\nMR. M URPHY [of New York:] Mr.\nChairman, this amendment was adopt-\ned by this House, passed into law, and\nincorporated in the 4R Act of 1976.\nWhat this amendment does is just\nrestate the fact of the matter because\nthe Interstate Commerce Commission\nand, of course, ConRail itself have\nfailed to implement the law.\nMr. Chairman, the amendment cer-\ntainly is germane. It has already been\npart of this act, and it is a restatement\nof the original amendment of 3 years\nago. ...\nMR. R OBERT E. B AUMAN [of Mary-\nland]: Mr. Chairman, I point out that\nthe substitute amendment to which the\namendment is proposed amends the\nRegional Rail Reorganization Act. The\namendment itself, however, amends\nthe Interstate Commerce Act, an en-\ntirely different statute; and as has\nbeen pointed out by the gentlewoman\nfrom Maryland [Ms. Mikulski], theClayton Act, which is not, I under-\nstand, under the jurisdiction of this\ncommittee, but under the jurisdiction\nof the Committee on the Judiciary,\nwhich is a test of germaneness.\nMr. Chairman, the entire thrust of\nthe gentleman's amendment deals with\nthe establishment and maintenance of\nrates, charges, and tariffs and their\nclassifications and divisions, whereas\nthe bill itself deals with nothing like\nthat, but, rather, with the funding, de-\nbentures, and stocks and other related\nmatters dealing with ConRail. ...\nTHECHAIRMAN :(18)The Chair is pre-\npared to rule.\nThe gentlewoman from Maryland\n[Ms. Mikulski] makes a point of order\nthat the amendment offered by the\ngentleman from New York (Mr. Mur-\nphy) is not germane to the amendment\nin the nature of a substitute in that\nthe Rooney amendment in the nature\nof a substitute amends the Regional\nRail Transportation Act and provides\nfor financial assistance to railroads in\nthe ConRail system, while the amend-\nment offered thereto amends the Inter-\nstate Commerce Act and also provides\nchanges in the Clayton Act which deal\nwith the issue of antitrust matters and\nrailroad rates applicable not only to\nConRail but to other rail systems.\nThe Chair, therefore, sustains the\npoint of order.\nBill Amending Several Sec-\ntions of LawÐAmendment Af-\nfecting Sections Not Men-\ntioned in Bill\n§35.81 A bill amending several\nsections of an existing law\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01541 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8922DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n19.121 C ONG. REC. 3596, 94th Cong. 1st\nSess. 20.Walter Flowers (Ala.).may be sufficiently com-\nprehensive to permit amend-\nments which are germane to\nother sections of that law;\nthus, to a bill amending sev-\neral sections of the Regional\nRail Reorganization Act of\n1973, an amendment to a sec-\ntion of that Act not men-\ntioned in the bill, relating to\ncongressional disapproval of\nreorganization plans, and\ngermane to that section, was\nheld germane to the bill\n(where the argument was not\nmade that the amendment\nchanged the rules of the\nHouse).\nDuring consideration of a bill to\namend H.R. 2051 on Feb. 19,\n1975,(19)the Chair overruled a\npoint of order against the fol-\nlowing amendment:\nMR. [J OHN M.] A SHBROOK [of Ohio]:\nMr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr.\nAshbrook: On page 7 after line 24 in-\nsert a new section 5 (and number\nthe succeeding Sections accordingly).\nSec. 5. (a) Section 208(a) of the Re-\ngional Rail Reorganization Act of\n1973. The sentence ``The final sys-\ntem plan shall be deemed approved\nat the end of the first period of 60\ncalendar days of continuous session\nof Congress after such date of trans-\nmittal unless either the House of\nRepresentatives or the Senate passesa resolution during such period stat-\ning that it does not favor the final\nsystem.'' is amended by deleting the\nlanguage after ``shall' and inserting\nin lieu thereof ``be voted by each\nHouse of Congress within the period\nof 60 calendar days of continuous\nsession of Congress after such date\nof transmittal.''. ..\nMR. [J OHN D.] D INGELL [of Michi-\ngan]: Mr. Chairman, I make the point\nof order on two bases. ...\nThe second point of order, Mr. Chair-\nman, is that the amendment goes be-\nyond the scope of the legislation before\nus. It deals with sections of the statute\nnot currently before the House, and as\nsuch it seeks to go to matters on which\nMembers of this body could not, in the\nexercise of reasonable prudence and\ncare, have been forewarned as to the\nexistence of the pendency of this par-\nticular amendment, and that therefore\nthe amendment is violative of the rule\nof germaneness and is not properly be-\nfore the body at this time. ...\nMR. ASHBROOK : ... [I]t is very clear\nthat the entire matter is before us. We\nare talking about the bill as it now\nstands, referring to a prospective date\nof 60 days, when the plan would go\ninto operation. All my amendment does\nis to change that, to make it affirma-\ntive action rather than negative action\nof the House that is required. I think\nit is consistent with the precedents and\nthe point of order should be overruled.\nTHECHAIRMAN :(20)The Chair is pre-\npared to rule. ...\nAs to the second point made by the\ngentleman from Michigan, the Chair\nhas examined the amendment as well\nas the ``Ramseyer'' in the report on the\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01542 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8923AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n1.The Surface Transportation Act of\n1980.\n2.126 C ONG. REC. 32169, 32170, 96th\nCong. 2d Sess.bill under consideration and, in the\nopinion of the Chair, the bill under\nconsideration amends several sections\nof the act, and is so comprehensive an\namendment as to permit germane\namendments to any portion of the law.\nThe amendment offered by the gen-\ntleman from Ohio is germane to the\nsection 208 of the act which provides\nfor review by Congress. Therefore the\nChair overrules the point of order\nraised by the gentleman from Michi-\ngan.\nParliamentarian's Note: Had the\nargument been made that the\nAshbrook amendment constituted\na change in House and Senate\nrules by requiring a vote in each\nHouse within a certain time pe-\nriod, the Chair would have been\nadvised to sustain the germane-\nness point of order.\nUrban Mass Transportation\nActÐ``Buy American'' Provi-\nsions\n§35.82 To an amendment in\nthe nature of a substitute\ncomprehensively amending\nthe Urban Mass Transpor-\ntation Act and authorizing\nthe appropriation of funds to\ncarry out that Act, an amend-\nment further amending the\nAct to prohibit the obligation\nof funds authorized to be ap-\npropriated thereunder for\ncertain contracts unless\nAmerican-made goods beused, in pursuance of such\ncontracts, to the extent spec-\nified in the amendment, was\nheld germane as a restriction\non the broad authorities\ngranted in the bill.\nDuring consideration of H.R.\n6417(1)in the Committee of the\nWhole on Dec. 4, 1980,(2)it was\nheld that, to a bill granting au-\nthorities to the federal govern-\nment or authorizing the appro-\npriation of funds, an amendment\ndenying the use of those authori-\nties or funds to purchase foreign-\nmade goods or equipment is ger-\nmane. The proceedings were as\nfollows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Ober-\nstar to the amendment in the nature\nof a substitute offered by Mr. How-\nard, as amended: Page 44, after line\n7, insert the following:\nBUY AMERICA\nSec. 225. (a) Section 12 of the\nUrban Mass Transportation Act of\n1964 is amended by adding at the\nend thereof the following new sub-\nsection:\n``(h)(1) Notwithstanding any other\nprovision of law, the Secretary of\nTransportation shall not obligate any\nfunds authorized to be appropriated\nby this Act for any project contract\nwhose total cost exceeds $500,000\nunless only such unmanufactured ar-\nticles, materials, and supplies as\nhave been mined or produced in the\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01543 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8924DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\nUnited States, and only such manu-\nfactured articles, materials, and sup-\nplies as have been manufactured in\nthe United States at least 50 per\ncentum from articles, materials, and\nsupplies mined, produced, or manu-\nfactured, as the case may be, in the\nUnited States, will be used in such\nproject contract. ...\n(b) The amendment made by sub-\nsection (a) shall not apply to project\ncontracts entered into on or before\nthe date of enactment of this Act or\noptions exercised pursuant to such\ncontracts. Section 401 of the Surface\nTransportation Assistance Act of\n1978 shall not apply to any project\ncontract entered into after the date\nof enactment of this Act for a project\nto which section 12(h) of the Urban\nMass Transportation Act of 1964 ap-\nplies. ...\nMR. [B ILL] FRENZEL [of Minnesota]:\nMr. Chairman, I make a point of order\nagainst the amendment offered by the\ngentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Ober-\nstar). This proposed amendment vio-\nlates rule XVI, clause 7. ...\nHinds' volume V, section 5825, states\nthat while a committee may report a\nbill embracing different subjects, it is\nnot in order during consideration in\nthe House to introduce a new subject\nby way of amendment.\nCannon's, chapter 8, section 2995,\nstates that the burden of proof is on\nthe proponent of an amendment to es-\ntablish germaneness, and where an\namendment is equally susceptible to\nmore than one interpretation, one of\nwhich renders it not germane, the\nChair will rule it out of order.\nMr. Chairman, the Oberstar amend-\nment seeks to introduce a new subject\nwhich is part neither of this bill nor of\nthe statute which this bill seeks to\namend. The Oberstar amendmentwould introduce a Buy America re-\nquirement, through which funds will\nbe limited, into the Urban Mass Tran-\nsit Act of 1964, where none now exists,\nand in so doing, it repeals the similar\nprovision that currently exists in the\nSurface Transportation Assistance Act\nof 1978. It is an attempt to amend the\nSurface Transportation Assistance Act\nof 1978 by adding to the statute which\nthis bill amends and repealing it where\nit currently exists.\nIt may be argued that the amend-\nments made by this bill are sufficiently\nbroad to open the entire 1964 act for\namendment. But the 1964 act contains\nno such domestic content provision.\nThe Oberstar amendment introduces\na new subject, and couching it in lan-\nguage that tacks the provision on at\nthe end of the existing section of the\n1964 act is not enough to make it ger-\nmane.\nThe Oberstar amendment really\namends the Surface Transportation\nAct of 1978, an act which itself amend-\ned the 1964 act.\nI submit that regardless of whether\nH.R. 6417 is broad enough to open the\nentire 1964 act for amendment, it is\nnot broad enough to open other acts .\n. . for amendments as well, and neither\nis it broad enough to render germane\nany new subject. ...\nMR. [J AMES L.] O BERSTAR [of Min-\nnesota]: . .. I rise in opposition to the\npoint of order.\nMr. Chairman, the amendment that\nI am offering is to the Howard sub-\nstitute, which is substantially broad\nenough to admit an amendment deal-\ning with the Buy America Act, which is\na part of the original Urban Mass\nTransit Act. There was a Buy America\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01544 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8925AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n3.Gerry E. Studds (Mass.).provision in the Surface Transpor-\ntation Assistance Act of 1978, which\nprovided that a final manufactured ar-\nticle should be substantially all-Amer-\nican produced and established the 10-\npercent price differential between for-\neign and domestic bids.\nMy amendment would broaden that\nlanguage, which is existing law some-\nwhat, and is perfectly in order because\nit is an amendment to the Howard\nsubstitute and is restricted entirely to\nthe language of the Urban Mass\nTransportation Act and does not, as\nthe gentleman from Minnesota sug-\ngested, go beyond the provisions of the\nUrban Mass Transportation Act. ...\nTHECHAIRMAN PROTEMPORE :(3)The\nChair is prepared to rule.\nThe Chair has heard the arguments\nof both the maker of the point of order\nand the opponent of it, and the Chair\nis constrained to agree with the gen-\ntleman from Minnesota (Mr. Oberstar)\nthat the amendment amends only the\nUrban Mass Transportation Act. That\nlaw in 1978 was in effect amended by\nthe Buy America title contained in the\nSurface Transportation Assistance Act,\nand the pending amendment only al-\nters the effect of the 1978 law as it re-\nlates to authorities under UMTA. On\ntwo previous occasions, Buy America\namendments have been held germane\nwhen offered to bills, comprehensively\namending existing laws and drafted as\nrestrictions on authorities contained in\nthose laws.\nThe first was on May 7, 1959, when\nChairman Bass held germane to a bill\npermitting the Tennessee Valley Au-\nthority to raise capital by issuance of\nbonds, an amendment prohibiting useof such funds to purchase foreign-made\nequipment. On another occasion per-\nhaps the gentleman from Minnesota\n(Mr. Frenzel) will recall, when he\nmade a similar point of order to the\nOuter Continental Shelf Lands Act\namendments; and the chairman of the\ncommittee at that time, the gentleman\nfrom Kentucky (Mr. Natcher), on July\n21, 1976, held the amendment to be in\norder. These precedents are contained\nin Deschler's Procedure, chapter 28,\nsections 4.27 and 23.7.\nThe Chair, therefore, overrules the\npoint of order and recognizes the gen-\ntleman from Minnesota (Mr. Oberstar)\nin support of his amendment for 5\nminutes.\nEnergy Research and Develop-\nment ProgramsÐAmendment\nto Define ``Research and De-\nvelopment''\n§35.83 To a bill not only con-\ntaining authorizations for\none fiscal year but also\namending permanent laws in\nseveral respects, an amend-\nment further amending one\nof those laws in a related\nway may be germane; thus,\nto a bill, open to amendment\nat any point, which not only\nauthorized civilian research\nand development programs\nfor the Department of En-\nergy for a fiscal year but also\namended in diverse ways\nseveral permanent laws re-\nlating to energy research and\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01545 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8926DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n4.124 C ONG. R EC.20994, 20995, 95th\nCong. 2d Sess.\n5.Id. at pp. 21194±96.development programs, an\namendment adding a new\ntitle to further amend one of\nthose laws to define the term\n``research and development''\nfor purposes of laws author-\nizing energy research and\ndevelopment was held ger-\nmane.\nDuring consideration of H.R.\n12163 in the Committee of the\nWhole on July 14(4)and July\n17,(5)1978, the Chair overruled a\npoint of order in the cir-\ncumstances described above. The\nproceedings were as follows:\nTITLE VÐGENERAL PROVISIONS\n...\nSec. 504. (a) Section 111 of the En-\nergy Reorganization Act of 1974 is\namended by adding at the end there-\nof the following new subsection:\n``(j)(1) Beginning with fiscal year\n1980 with respect to Department of\nEnergy civilian research and devel-\nopment programs, for purposes of\nthe President's annual budget sub-\nmission and of related reports sub-\nmitted by the Secretary of Energy to\nthe House Committee on Science and\nTechnology and to the Senate Com-\nmittee on Energy and Natural Re-\nsources each plant and capital equip-\nment construction project shall be\nassigned or reassigned to one of the\nfollowing categories. ...\nMR. [D ON] F UQUA [of Florida]:\nMadam Chairman, I offer an amend-\nment.The Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Fuqua:\nAt the end of the bill, add the fol-\nlowing new title:\nTITLE VIIÐDEFINITION OF\nRESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT\nSec. 701. Section 304 of the En-\nergy Reorganization Act of 1974 (42\nU.S.C. 5874) is amended by inserting\n``(a)'' after ``Sec. 304.'', and by adding\nat the end thereof the following new\nsubsection:\n``(b)(1) For purposes of this Act and\nthe Atomic Energy Act of 1954, the\nFederal Non-nuclear Energy Re-\nsearch and Development Act of 1974,\nand the Department of Energy Orga-\nnization Act, the term ``research and\ndevelopment'' meansÐ\n``(A) basic and applied research\n...\n``(D) concept and demonstration\ndevelopment; and\n``(E) operational systems develop-\nment.\n``(2) As used in paragraph (1)Ð\n``(A) the term ``basic research''\nmeans systematic and intensive\nstudy directed toward greater knowl-\nedge or understanding of a specific\nsubject, and toward the expansion of\nman's fundamental knowledge of na-\nture (with or without immediate rel-\nevance to specific technology pro-\ngrams). ...\nMR. [J OHN D.] D INGELL [of Michi-\ngan]: Madam Chairman, I make the\npoint of order that the amendment is\nnot germane to the bill which lies be-\nfore us.\nI would point out, first of all, that\nthe burden is upon the offeror of the\namendment to establish the germane-\nness thereof.\nFurthermore, Madam Chairman,\nunder the traditions and practices of\nthe House as well as under the rules of\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01546 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8927AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n6.Barbara Jordan (Tex.).the House, it is well settled that the\nEnergy Reorganization Act of 1974 re-\nferred to is a statute relating to the re-\norganization of government and does\nnot lie under the jurisdiction of the\nCommittee on Science and Technology.\nI would point out that the amend-\nment clearly seeks to amend a statute\nlying under the jurisdiction of another\ncommittee. ...\nI would point out that the amend-\nment here offered by the gentleman\nfrom Florida seeks to change perma-\nnent law, as opposed to simply laying\nforth for the House the basis upon\nwhich appropriations may be made,\nwhich is the basic purpose on which\nthis particular legislation is before the\nHouse. The amendment affects the\nAtomic Energy Act of 1954.\nI point out again that this amend-\nment, which is offered to a 1-year au-\nthorization, is permanent legislation,\ndefining a rather sweeping responsi-\nbility of the Department of Energy of\nwhich I am not able to advise the\nChair of all the consequences, nor is\nthe author.\nIn reiteration, I point out that this is\nan authorization bill, and it includes\nlimitations and procedural changes. Of\ncourse, adoption of this amendment\ndoes not affect jurisdiction of any com-\nmittee or affect the rules of the House.\nOther permanent provisions of the\namendment go much beyond the provi-\nsions of an annual authorization, and\ndeal with what is essentially perma-\nnent and lasting legislation, not only of\nthe Atomic Energy Act, but also again,\nI reiterate, another statute not under\nthe jurisdiction of this committee at\nall, the Energy Reorganization Act of\n1974, which was referred to the Com-mittee on Government Operations.\n...\nMR. [J OHN W.] W YDLER [of New\nYork]: Madam Chairman, I would only\npoint out to the Chair that in the bill\nthe gentleman from Michigan is going\nto bring to the floor immediately upon\nthe conclusion of the bill we are now\nconsidering, he amends the Depart-\nment of Energy Act in many places,\nand I would be hard pressed to under-\nstand how he is going to defend that\naction when he is contending that\ndoing this is a violation of the rules of\nthe House. ...\nTHE CHAIRMAN :(6)The Chair is\nready to rule.\nThe gentleman from Michigan (Mr.\nDingell) raises a point of order against\nthe amendment offered by the gen-\ntleman from Florida (Mr. Fuqua) on\nthe basis that the amendment is not\ngermane to the legislation. The Chair\nwould state to the gentleman from\nMichigan that this amendment does\nnot amend the rules of the House.\nUnder the rule which provides for con-\nsideration of this legislation a sub-\nstitute was made in order as an origi-\nnal bill, the substitute which was an\namendment by the gentleman from\nFlorida (Mr. Fuqua) printed in the\nRecord on the 23d of June.\nIn the substitute which was made in\norder as an original bill, the energy\nReorganization Act is substantively\namended in a permanent way. The\ngentleman from Florida now seeks to\nadd a new title following the ``general\nprovisions'' portion of the bill to pro-\nvide a definition of research and devel-\nopment under the aegis of the Energy\nReorganization Act. That is clearly ger-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01547 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8928DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n7.119 C ONG. REC. 41750, 93d Cong. 1st\nSess.mane because of the provisions of this\nbill and under the the precedents that\nhave been established in interpreting\nand applying the rules of the House re-\nlated to the question of germaneness.\nThe amendment obviously relates to\nthe question of energy research and de-\nvelopment, the subject of the pending\nbill. Consequently the Chair overrules\nthe point of order raised by the gen-\ntleman from Michigan.\nRationing Under Emergency\nPetroleum Allocation ActÐ\nUser Charges for Allocations\n§35.84 To a section of an\namendment in the nature of\na substitute which amended\nsection 4 of the Emergency\nPetroleum Allocation Act of\n1973 to authorize the Presi-\ndent to establish priorities,\nincluding rationing of gaso-\nline, among users of petro-\nleum products, an amend-\nment providing that any ra-\ntioning proposal for indi-\nvidual users of gasoline\nshould include payment of a\nuser charge to qualify for ad-\nditional allocations was held\nto constitute a tax which was\nnot within the category of ra-\ntioning authority in the sub-\nstitute and was ruled out as\nnot germane.\nDuring consideration of the En-\nergy Emergency Act (H.R. 11450)\nin the Committee of the Whole onDec. 14, 1973,(7)the Chair ruled\nthat an amendment to an amend-\nment in the nature of a substitute\nwas not germane. The proceedings\nwere as follows:\nSec. 103. Amendments to the Emer-\ngency Petroleum Allocation Act of\n1973.\n(a) Section 4 of the Emergency Petro-\nleum Allocation Act of 1973 is amend-\ned by adding at the end thereof the fol-\nlowing new subsections:\n``(h)(1) If the President finds that,\nwithout such action, the objectives of\nsubsection (b) cannot be attained, he\nmay promulgate a rule which shall be\ndeemed a part of the regulation under\nsubsection (a) and which shall provide,\nconsistent with the objectives of sub-\nsection (b), an ordering of priorities\namong users of crude oil, residual fuel\noil, or any refined petroleum product,\nand for the assignment to such users of\nrights entitling them to obtain any\nsuch oil or product in precedence to\nother users not similarly entitled. A\ntop priority in such ordering shall be\nthe maintenance of vital services (in-\ncluding, but not limited to new housing\nconstruction, education, health care,\nhospitals, public safety, energy produc-\ntion, agriculture, and transportation\nservices, which are necessary to the\npreservation of health, safety, and the\npublic welfare). ...\n``(6) For purposes of this subsection,\nthe term `allocation' shall not be con-\nstrued to exclude the end-use alloca-\ntion of gasoline to individual con-\nsumers.\nMR. [J AMES G.] M ARTIN [of North\nCarolina:] Mr. Chairman, I offer an\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01548 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8929AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n8.Richard Bolling (Mo.).\n9.The Emergency Energy Act.\n10.119 C ONG. REC. 41688, 41689, 93d\nCong. 1st Sess.amendment to the amendment in the\nnature of a substitute offered by the\ngentleman from West Virginia (Mr.\nStaggers).\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Martin\nof North Carolina to the amendment\nin the nature of a substitute offered\nby Mr. Staggers: On page 6, at line\n6, strike the period, and add: ``; Pro-\nvided, however, That any proposal by\nthe President for the rationing of\nfuel for personal automobiles and\nrecreational vehicles should, in addi-\ntion to the basic non-discriminatory\nration, include provisions under\nwhich the individual consumer may\nqualify for additional allocations of\nfuel upon payment of a free or user\ncharge on a per unit basis to the\nFederal Energy Administration.''\nMR. [H ARLEY O.] S TAGGERS [of West\nVirginia]: Mr. Chairman, I make a\npoint of order against the amendment\non the ground that it is not germane.\n...\nI make the point of order on the\namendment on the ground that it au-\nthorizes a user's fee in the nature of a\ntax and that is not supposed to come\nwithin the jurisdiction of our com-\nmittee. That authority is delegated to\nthe Ways and Means Committee.\nMR. MARTIN of [North Carolina:] Mr.\nChairman, I believe that the amend-\nment is germane and pertinent to the\nsection dealing with gasoline rationing.\n...\nThis amendment does not propose a\ntax as such and so does not run afoul\nof the prerogatives of the honorable\nCommittee on Ways and Means. In-\nstead it proposes an administrative fee\nto be charged, much as fees are\ncharged by the National Park Service\nunder the Golden Eagle plan for use ofour park resources. This fee as I pro-\npose it would be charged for pref-\nerential use of any extra limited fuel\nresources.\nTHECHAIRMAN :(8)The Chair is con-\nstrained to sustain the point of order\non the ground that this amendment in\neffect would result in a tax not directly\nrelated to the rationing authority con-\nferred by the amendment in the nature\nof a substitute.\nProvisions Modifying Stand-\nards Imposed by Clean Air\nActÐAmendment Suspending\nAuthority of Administrator\nTo Control Automobile Emis-\nsions\n§35.85 To an amendment in\nthe nature of a substitute\ncomprehensively amending\nseveral sections of the Clean\nAir Act with respect to the\nimpact of the shortage of en-\nergy resources upon stand-\nards imposed under that Act,\nan amendment to another\nsection of that Act sus-\npending for a temporary pe-\nriod the authority of the Ad-\nministrator of the Environ-\nmental Protection Agency to\ncontrol automobile emissions\nwas held germane.\nDuring consideration of H.R.\n11450(9)on Dec. 14, 1973,(10)the\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01549 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8930DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\nChair overruled a point of order\nagainst the following amendment:\nMR. [L OUIS C.] W YMAN [of New\nHampshire]: Mr. Chairman, I offer an\namendment to the amendment in the\nnature of a substitute offered by the\ngentleman from West Virginia (Mr.\nStaggers).\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr.\nWyman to the amendment in the na-\nture of a substitute offered by Mr.\nStaggers: On page 59, after line 23,\ninsert the following:\n(1) Section 202(b) of the Clean Air\nAct (42 U.S.C. 1857) is amended by\nadding at the end thereof the fol-\nlowing:\n``(6)(a) Notwithstanding any other\nprovision of law, the authority of the\nAdministrator to require emissions\ncontrols on automobiles is hereby\nsuspended except for automobiles\nregistered to residents of those areas\nof the United States as specified by\nsubsection (b) of this section, until\nJanuary 1, 1977, or the day on which\nthe President declares that shortage\nof petroleum is at an end, whichever\noccurs later.\n(b) Within 60 days after the date\nof enactment of this paragraph, and\nannually thereafter, the Adminis-\ntrator shall designate, subject to the\nlimitations set forth herein, geo-\ngraphic areas of the United States in\nwhich there is significant auto emis-\nsions related air pollution. The Ad-\nministrator shall not designate as\nsuch area any part of the United\nStates outside the following Air\nQuality Control Regions as defined\nby the Administrator as of the date\nof enactment of this paragraph with-\nout justification to and prior ap-\nproval of the Congress. ...\n(3) Section 203(a)(3) of such Act is\namended to read as follows:\n``(3) for any person to register, on\nor after 60 days after the date of en-actment of this paragraph, a motor\nvehicle or motor vehicle engine for\nwhich the regulations prescribed\nunder section 202(a)(1) do not apply\nunder section 202(a)(3) if such per-\nson resides in a geographic area des-\nignated by the Administrator to be a\ngeographic area in which there is\nsignificant air pollution; or''. ...\nMR. [J OHN D.] D INGELL [of Michi-\ngan]: . .. The second ground on which\nI make a point of order is that at no\npoint in the bill before us appears an\namendment to section 203 of the Clean\nAir Act. In fact, the gentleman's\namendment deals with section 203 and\nnot with the sections which are before\nus.\nAs the Chair will observe from the\nreading of the Clean Air Act, section\n203 is the penalty section and relates\nto certifications. Section 202(b) man-\ndates the EPA to establish emission\nlimitations for automobiles, and it is to\nsection 202(b) which the bill itself now\ndoes apply. The amendment goes much\nfurther than that and it restricts the\nauthority of automobile owners to reg-\nister automobiles in States, and this\nmatter is not spoken to otherwise or\nelsewhere in the legislation before us.\nIt is, therefore, my strong view, Mr.\nChairman, that the amendment before\nus is not germane to the legislation in\ndealing with subjects not in the bill\nand not presently before the House.\nObviously the germaneness rules are\nhere to protect Members from being\nsurprised by amendments which relate\nto matters different than those before\nus. Obviously the amendment relates\nto sections of the Clean Air Act and to\nmatters that are not before us. For\nthat reason the point of order against\nthe amendment should be sustained.\n...\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01550 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8931AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n11.Richard Bolling (Mo.).12.See 119 C ONG. REC. 41716±18, 93d\nCong. 1st Sess. (proceedings relating\nto H.R. 11450, the Energy Emer-\ngency Act).MR. W YMAN : ... [The amendment]\nsimply suspends . .. the authority of\nthe Administrator to impose [require-\nments for emission controls] for a defi-\nnite period during the energy crisis.\nThis is so plainly in order that I sub-\nmit the Chair should overrule the\npoint of order.\nTHE CHAIRMAN :(11)The Chair is\nready to rule. ...\nThe second aspect of the point of\norder is the question of nongermane-\nness in connection with the Clean Air\nAct. The Chair has simply looked at\nthe Ramseyer on the bill before us and\nit is very clear that the Clean Air Act\nis comprehensively amended by the bill\nand by the pending amendment in the\nnature of a substitute. Therefore, the\nChair overrules the point of order of\nthe gentleman from Michigan.\nRegulations Affecting Ration-\ning of Petroleum ProductsÐ\nAmending Rules To Establish\nCongressional Disapproval\nProcedure\n§35.86 While an amendment\namending the rules of the\nHouse to establish a special\ndisapproval procedure would\nnot ordinarily be germane to\na proposition which granted\ncertain authority to the exec-\nutive but did not contain a\nprovision affecting congres-\nsional procedure, such an\namendment is in order\nwhere the section of lawbeing amended by that prop-\nosition contains a com-\nparable provision.\nOn Dec. 14, 1973,(12)the Com-\nmittee of the Whole had under\nconsideration a section of an\namendment in the nature of a\nsubstitute which amended section\n4 of the Emergency Petroleum Al-\nlocation Act of 1973 to authorize\nthe president to establish prior-\nities, including rationing proce-\ndures, among users of petroleum\nproducts. An amendment was of-\nfered which conditioned the effec-\ntiveness of those regulations upon\nsubsequent congressional dis-\napproval (amending the rules of\nboth Houses to provide for the\nprivileged consideration of dis-\napproval resolutions). The amend-\nment was held germane, where\nthe section of law being amended\nalready contained a provision per-\nmitting either House to dis-\napprove regulations exempting\ncertain petroleum products from\nallocations under that section.\nThe proceedings were as fol-\nlows:\nMR. [H. J OHN] H EINZ [III, of Penn-\nsylvania]: Mr. Chairman, I offer an\namendment to the amendment in the\nnature of a substitute offered by the\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01551 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8932DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\ngentleman from West Virginia (Mr.\nStaggers). ...\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Heinz\nto the amendment in the nature of a\nsubstitute offered by Mr. Staggers.\nPage 8, after line 18, insert the fol-\nlowing new subsection: (e) Section 4\nof the Emergency Petroleum Alloca-\ntion Act of 1973 is amended by in-\nserting at the end thereof the fol-\nlowing new subsections:\n``(l)(1) The President shall transmit\nany rule (other than any technical or\nclerical amendments) which amends\nthe regulation (promulgated pursu-\nant to subsection (a) of this section)\nwith respect to end-use allocation\nauthorized under subsection (h) of\nthis section.\n``(2) Any such rule with respect to\nend-use allocation shall, for purposes\nof subsections (m) and (n) of this sec-\ntion, be treated as an energy action\nand shall take effect only if such ac-\ntions are not disapproved by either\nHouse of Congress as provided in\nsubsections (m) and (n) of this sec-\ntion.\n``(m) D ISAPPROVAL OF CONGRESS .\n...\n``(3) Except as otherwise provided\nin paragraph (4) of this subsection,\nan energy action shall take effect at\nthe end of the first period of 15 cal-\nendar days of continuous session of\nCongress after the date on which the\nplan is transmitted to it unless, be-\ntween the date of transmittal and\nthe end of the 15-day period, either\nHouse passes a resolution stating in\nsubstance that that House not favor\nthe energy action. . ..\n``(n) D ISAPPROVAL PROCEDURE .Ð\n``(1) This subsection is enacted by\nCongressÐ\n``(A) as an exercise of the rule-\nmaking power of the Senate and the\nHouse of Representatives, respec-\ntively, and as such they are deemed\na part of the rules of each House, re-\nspectively, but applicable only withrespect to the procedure to be fol-\nlowed in that House in the case of\nresolutions described by paragraph\n(2) of this subsection; and they su-\npersede other rules only to the ex-\ntent that they are inconsistent there-\nwith; and\n``(B) with full recognition of the\nconstitutional right of either House\nto change the rules (so far as relat-\ning to the procedure of that House)\nat any time, in the same manner\nand to the same extent as in the\ncase of any other rule of that House.\n...\n``(4)(A) If the committee to which a\nresolution with respect to an energy\naction has been referred has not re-\nported it at the end of 5 calendar\ndays after its introduction, it is in\norder to move either to discharge the\ncommittee from further consider-\nation of the resolution or to dis-\ncharge the committee from further\nconsideration of any other resolution\nwith respect to the energy action\nwhich has been referred to the com-\nmittee.\n``(B) A motion to discharge may be\nmade only by an individual favoring\nthe resolution, is highly privileged\n(except that it may not be made\nafter the committee has reported a\nresolution with respect to the same\nenergy action), and debate thereon\nshall be limited to not more than 1\nhour, to be divided equally between\nthose favoring and those opposing\nthe resolution. An amendment to the\nmotion is not in order, and it is not\nin order to move to reconsider the\nvote by which the motion is agreed\nto or disagreed to. ...\nMR. [B OB] ECKHARDT [of Texas]: Mr.\nChairman, my point of order is that\nthe amendment is not germane to the\namendment in the nature of a sub-\nstitute. Further, the amendment is not\ngermane to the material of the bill.\n...\nMr. Chairman, what the amendment\npurports to do is create additional ma-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01552 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8933AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\nchinery with respect to the allocation\nsection of the bill which is covered in\nsection 103 of that bill so as to provide\nthat the powers which are to be exer-\ncised in allocation, including end use\nallocation, shall be subject to presen-\ntation to the Congress during a 15-day\nperiod in which, if they are not vetoed\nby one or the other House, such provi-\nsions may be canceled by having been\ndenied by the two Houses.\nThere is nothing in the original bill\nor in the amendment that provides for\nany procedure by which the matter\nshall be resubmitted to the Congress.\nThere is nothing in the amendment in\nthe nature of a substitute that has any\nsuch procedure in it.\nThe amendment offered here pro-\nvides an extensive amendment of the\nprocedures of both the House and Sen-\nate with respect to the manner in\nwhich this is accomplished.\nI should like to point out to the\nChair that this is not a small change\nin policy or in law but an extremely\nlarge one. What it purports to do, in ef-\nfect, is to change the role of the Presi-\ndency and that of the Congress and to\nafford a special procedure by which\nthis bill reserves to the Congress the\nadministrative position, a position in\nwhich as a condition subsequent to the\npassage of this bill this bill may re-\nquire a second look at the entire ques-\ntion and a determination on the ques-\ntion of policy by the Congress.\nThe major thrust of my point of\norder does not go to any question of\nconstitutionality.\nIt indicates too the fact that the mat-\nter contained herein so sweepingly al-\nters the procedures of the House, and\nthe work to accommodate itself to thispeculiar and unusual problem, that it\nis far beyond the scope of any provision\nin the bill. It does not in a minor man-\nner change the bill, but it changes it in\nan extremely substantial manner be-\ncause it calls upon the House to make\na deep and complete policy determina-\ntion with respect to the question of al-\nlocation at a time subsequent to the\npassage of the bill, and give that policy\ndetermination the effect of law as a\ncondition subsequent to its particular\nenactment. ...\nMR. HEINZ: ... Mr. Chairman, the\ngentleman from Texas contends on the\none hand that my amendment is not\nconstitutional, and on the other that it\nis not germane to the bill.\nOn the first point I would like to in-\ndicate, Mr. Chairman, that there are\nalready on the statute books two laws,\nthe War Powers Act, and the Proce-\ndure for Approving Executive Reorga-\nnizations. They use the same proce-\ndure for the two items I mentioned.\nTherefore I do not feel that the point of\nconstitutionality can stand the test.\nSecond, the gentleman from Texas\nargues that my amendment and the\ndisapproval portion thereof is not ger-\nmane to the bill. Were this the case it\nwould seem to me inconsistent, Mr.\nChairman, because we would not have\nhad, as we did 2 days ago, a vote on\nthe Broyhill amendment which in-\ncluded the exact same procedures as\nexist in my amendment.\nAdmittedly, section 105 is not sec-\ntion 103 but, nonetheless, both amend-\nments were offered to the amendment\nin the nature of a substitute, H.R.\n11882. I do not believe, therefore, Mr.\nChairman, that the point of order has\nmerit.\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01553 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8934DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n13.Richard Bolling (Mo.).14.125 C ONG. R EC. 16681±83, 96th\nCong. 1st Sess.\n15.The Defense Production Act Amend-\nments of 1979.MR. E CKHARDT : Mr. Chairman, I\nshould like to urge one other point\naside from the germaneness question,\nand that is that the amendment is out\nof order because it seeks to amend the\nRules of the House.\nMR. HEINZ: Mr. Chairman, if I may\nbe heard further, I just do not think\nthat the gentleman from Texas is cor-\nrect. What is in this amendment is\nsimply no different from writing into\nthe bill, which we could do at any time,\nfor any section, a provision which\nmight say ``notwithstanding anything\nin Section 103 or any other section, the\nExecutive Branch has to come back to\nthe Congress for enactment or ap-\nproval or determination, or anything.''\nTHECHAIRMAN :(13)The Chair is pre-\npared to rule.\nThe gentleman from Texas (Mr.\nEckhardt) makes a very interesting\nand strong argument. The Chair in its\nruling is persuaded that the question\nis a narrow question. The Chair does\nnot rule on the constitutional questions\nraised in this argument; but there are\ntwo aspects of the matter that the\nChair takes into consideration in its\ndecision. One, which the Chair believes\nto be the lesser one, is the fact that in\nthe original bill there is a similar pro-\nvision which in turn was offered as an\namendment to the amendment in the\nnature of a substitute. But the Chair\nrelies primarily on the fact that the\namendment offered by the gentleman\nfrom Pennsylvania (Mr. Heinz) is in\nfact an amendment to section 4 of Pub-\nlic Law 93±159, the Emergency Petro-\nleum Allocation Act which, in a dif-\nferent manner, does provide for a pro-\ncedure whereby the President shallmake submissions to the Congress.\nAnd whereby either House may dis-\napprove of such submissions.\nTherefore the Chair overrules the\npoint of order.\nIndirectly Superseding Other\nLaw\n§35.87 To a section of a bill\namending the Defense Pro-\nduction Act providing finan-\ncial assistance for synthetic\nfuel development to meet na-\ntional defense needs, an\namendment providing expe-\ndited review and approval of\ncertain designated priority\nprojects to be financed by\nthe bill, thereby indirectly\naffecting time periods for\nprocedural review specified\nin other laws, but not specifi-\ncally waiving provisions of\nsubstantive law which might\nprohibit completion of such\nprojects, was held germane\nas not directly amending\nsubstantive environmental or\nenergy laws within the juris-\ndiction of other committees.\nOn June 26, 1979,(14)during\nconsideration of H.R. 3930(15)in\nthe Committee of the Whole,\nChairman Gerry E. Studds, of\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01554 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8935AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\nMassachusetts, overruled a point\nof order and held the following\namendment to be germane:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Udall:\nPage 8, after line 13 add the following\nnew subsection and renumber the sub-\nsequent sections accordingly:\n(g)(1) The Secretary of Energy is\nhereby authorized to designate a pro-\nposed synthetic fuel or feedstock facil-\nity as a priority synthetic project pur-\nsuant to the procedures and criteria\nprovided in this section. ...\n(h)(1) Any person planning or pro-\nposing a synthetic fuel or feedstock fa-\ncility may apply to the Secretary of En-\nergy for an order designating such fa-\ncility as a priority synthetic\nproject. ...\n(i) Not later than forty-five days\nafter receipt of an application author-\nized under the previous section, the\nSecretary shall determine whether the\nproposed synthetic fuel or feedstock fa-\ncility is of sufficient national interest\nto be designated a priority synthetic\nproject. Upon reaching a determination\nthe Secretary shall publish his decision\nin the Federal Register and shall no-\ntify the applicant and the agencies\nidentified in subsection (h)(3). In mak-\ning such a determination the Secretary\nshall considerÐ\n(1) the extent to which the facility\nwould reduce the Nation's dependence\nupon imported oil;\n(2) the magnitude of any adverse en-\nvironmental impacts associated with\nthe facility and the existence of alter-\nnatives that would have fewer adverse\nimpacts; ...\n(7) the extent to which the applicant\nis prepared to complete or has alreadycompleted the significant actions which\nthe applicant in consultation with the\nDeputy Secretary anticipate will be\nidentified under subsection (1) as re-\nquired from the applicant; and\n(8) the public comments received\nconcerning such facility. ...\n(l) Not later than thirty days after\nnotice appears in the Federal Register\nof an order designating a proposed syn-\nthetic fuel or feedstock facility as a pri-\nority synthetic project, any Federal\nagency with authority to grant or deny\nany approval or to perform any action\nnecessary to the completion of such\nproject or any part thereof, shall trans-\nmit to the Secretary of Energy and to\nthe priority energy projectÐ\n(1) a compilation of all significant ac-\ntions required by such agency before a\nfinal decision or any necessary ap-\nproval(s) can be rendered;\n(2) a compilation of all significant ac-\ntions and information required of the\napplicant before a final decision by\nsuch agency can be made;\n(3) a tentative schedule for com-\npleting actions and obtaining the infor-\nmation listed in subsections (1) and (2)\nof this subsection;\n(4) all necessary application forms\nthat must be completed by the priority\nenergy project before such approval\ncan be granted; and\n(5) the amounts of funds and per-\nsonnel available to such agency to con-\nduct such actions and the impact of\nsuch schedule on other applications\npending before such agency.\n(m)(1) Not later than sixty days after\nnotice appears in the Federal Register\nof an order designating a synthetic fuel\nor feedstock facility as a priority syn-\nthetic project, the Secretary, in con-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01555 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8936DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\nsultation with the appropriate Federal,\nState and local agencies shall publish\nin the Federal Register a Project Deci-\nsion Schedule containing deadlines for\nall Federal actions relating to such\nproject. ...\n(3) All deadlines in the Project Deci-\nsion Schedule shall be consistent with\nthe statutory obligations of Federal\nagencies governed by such Schedule.\n(4) Except as provided in subpara-\ngraph (3) above and in subsection (p)\nno deadline established under this sec-\ntion or extension granted under sub-\nparagraph (5) of the section may result\nin the total time for agency action ex-\nceeding nine months beginning from\nthe date on which notice appears in\nthe Federal Register of an order desig-\nnating the proposed synthetic fuel or\nfeedstock facility as a priority synthetic\nproject.\n(5) Notwithstanding any deadline or\nother provision of Federal law, the\ndeadlines imposed by the Project Deci-\nsion Schedule shall constitute the law-\nful decisionmaking deadlines for re-\nviewing applications filed by the pri-\nority synthetic project. ...\nMR. [J OHN D.] D INGELL [of Michi-\ngan]: Mr. Chairman, I make a point of\norder that the amendment offered by\nmy good friend from Arizona is not\ngermane. ...\nMr. Chairman, it is well settled the\namendment must be germane not only\nto the section but also to the bill.\nMr. Chairman, the bill relates to the\nDefense Production Act.\nMr. Chairman, under the amend-\nment, a lengthy process is established\nwhereunder the Secretary of Energy,\nwho is not mentioned elsewhere in the\nbill, is authorized to designate syn-thetic fuel or feedstocks facilities as\npriority synthetic projects, pursuant to\nlengthy criteria which are set forth at\nthe first and second pages and fol-\nlowing.\nSo, Mr. Chairman, there is a whole\nrange of broad new responsibilities im-\nposed on the Secretary of Energy not\nfound elsewhere, either in the Defense\nProduction Act or in the bill before us,\nwhich are quite complex, very obvious,\nand which involve a lengthy amount of\nwork and which involve amendment ei-\nther directly or indirectly of a large\nnumber of Federal, State, and local\nstatutes dealing with the project and\npermitting the project.\nThere is also an extensive procedural\nresponsibility on both the Secretary\nand one which is imposed on the Gov-\nernor of the State in which the action\nwould occur.\nFor that reason, Mr. Chairman, a\nMember of this body could not very\nwell anticipate as would be required by\nthe rules of germaneness that an\namendment of this sweep and breadth\ncould be visited upon us. ...\nMR. [R OBERT E.] B AUMAN [of Mary-\nland]: Mr. Chairman, a further point of\norder. ...\nI make a point of order against the\namendment for the following reasons:\nThe bill before us, H.R. 3930, amends\nthe Defense Production Act of 1950\nand it does so by extending the author-\nity of the act and also providing for the\npurchase of synthetic fuels and syn-\nthetic chemical feed stock and for other\npurposes. An examination of the other\npurposes reveals nothing akin to the\namendment before us. The amendment\nbefore us in effect seeks to apply the\nNational Environmental and Policy Act\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01556 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8937AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\nof 1969, specifically on page 5 in sub-\nparagraph (d) to the facilities that\nwould contract with the Government.\nIt appears to me that by attempting\nto do this, this is beyond the scope of\nthe jurisdiction of this committee. It is\nwithin the scope of other committees'\njurisdictions and certainly beyond the\nscope of the bill, which simply deals\nwith contracts and purchases and not\nthe environmental qualities or activi-\nties of the people who seek to contract\nwith the Government.\nTherefore, the amendment is not\ngermane and beyond the scope of the\nbill. ...\nMR. [M ORRIS K.] U DALL [of Arizona]:\n... The pending bill creates authority\nto finance directly and indirectly syn-\nthetic fuel and chemical feed stocks,\nfeedstock projects. ...\nWhat my amendment does is not to\nchange any of the existing laws. It does\nnot change any environmental protec-\ntion laws or anything else, but it says\nwe are going to have decisions. Within\nnine months after this is put on the\nfast track, we are going to get a yes or\nno decision on it. ...\nThis amendment simply supple-\nments the existing statutory proce-\ndures to achieve expedited approval or\ndisapproval of various authorities nec-\nessary for the completion of synfuel\nprojects created under the authority of\nthe legislation; so the subject matter of\nthe amendment is germane to the sub-\nject of the pending legislation. The\npoint of order ought to be rejected, Mr.\nChairman.\nTHECHAIRMAN : The Chair is pre-\npared to rule.\nThe bill before the committee\nbestows authority for loan guaranteesto finance synthetic fuel or feedstock\nfacility construction. The amendment\nof the gentleman from Arizona estab-\nlishes a complex mechanism for expe-\nditing procedures for projects financed\nby loan guarantees under the bill.\nThe Chair is unable in response to\nthe gentleman from Maryland to find\nany respect in which the amendment\nof the gentleman from Arizona would\namend the National Environmental\nProtection Act, but merely provides\nthat determinations made as to pri-\nority of synthetic projects eligible for\nexpeditious review shall not be consid-\nered major Federal actions under that\nlaw.\nIn the opinion of the Chair, the total-\nity of the Udall amendment constitutes\nessentially an expediting of procedures\nunder authorities provided for in the\nbill and is, therefore, germane.\nThe Chair overrules the point of\norder.\nSpecific Project Deemed To\nSatisfy Requirements of Law\nBeing Amended\n§35.88 To a bill amending an\nexisting law (the Endangered\nSpecies Act) which had been\ninterpreted to prohibit com-\npletion of certain federally\nfunded construction projects\nwhere species of wildlife\nwould be adversely affected,\nan amendment providing\nthat a specific federal project\npermit be deemed to satisfy\nthe requirements of that law\nwas held germane as not spe-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01557 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8938DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n16.124 C ONG. REC. 38143, 38144, 95th\nCong. 2d Sess. 17.B. F. Sisk (Calif.).cifically broadening authori-\nties of federal agencies not\nadministering that law.\nOn Oct. 14, 1978,(16)during con-\nsideration of H.R. 14014 in the\nCommittee of the Whole, the\nChair overruled a point of order\nagainst the following amendment:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Ron-\ncalio: On page 32, after line 21, add\nnew section (No. 12) as follows:\n``The Department of the Army Per-\nmit to Basin Electric Power Coopera-\ntive for the Missouri Basin Power\nProject, issued on March 23, 1978, as\namended October 10, 1978, is hereby\ndeemed to satisfy the requirements\nof the Endangered Species Act (16\nU.S.C. 1531 et seq.). ...\nMR. [J OHN J.] C AVANAUGH [of Ne-\nbraska]: Mr. Chairman, I make a point\nof order against the amendment. The\namendment is not germane to the sec-\ntion of the bill to which it is offered,\nand in addition it imposes duties upon\nthe Secretary of Commerce that are\nnowhere else mentioned in the bill.\nMR. [M ARK] ANDREWS of North Da-\nkota: ... If a project of this type is\nstopped because of an interpretation of\nan act of the Congress, how then can\nthe rules of the Congress prohibit the\nsame Congress from amending the ac-\ntion so that it does not affect a certain\ntype of project? This is basically what\nthe argument is all about. And to tie\nup projects which would prevent the\nhomeowners from getting their elec-\ntricity at a sensible cost because of the\ninterpretation of the lawÐif it cannot\nbe fixed in this body where can it be\nfixed? ...MR. [F RANK E.] E VANS of Colo-\nrado: ... I think the amendment now\npending offered by the gentleman from\nWyoming is clearly in order. The sim-\nple thing this amendment does is de-\nclare a legislative funding of fact rel-\native to the Endangered Species Act.\nThus it is clearly germane.\nTHE CHAIRMAN :(17)The Chair is\nready to rule. This occupant of the\nChair had, as indicated, to make a\nrather rapid analysis of the previous\namendment, not having been aware of\nthe questions at issue. The present\namendment offered by the gentleman\nfrom Wyoming would appear, based on\nthe information that the Chair has\navailable and on the precedents avail-\nable to him including the precedent\ncited by the gentleman from Wyoming,\nto be germane and completely in the\nproper form, and therefore overrules\nthe point of order in connection with\nthe amendment of the gentleman from\nWyoming.\nHouse Procedures: Content of\nCommittee ReportsÐAmend-\nment To Require Statements\nas to Effect of Appropriations\non Existing Law\n§35.89 To an amendment in\nthe nature of a substitute\namending Rules X and XI\nand making conforming and\nmiscellaneous changes in\nother rules to reorganize\nHouse committees, and in-\ncluding requirements as to\ncontent and filing of com-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01558 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8939AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n18.120 C ONG. REC. 34415, 34416, 93d\nCong. 2d Sess.mittee reports, an amend-\nment to Rule XXI (which re-\nlates to appropriation bills\nand reports) to require the\ncommittee report accom-\npanying any bill containing\nan appropriation to state the\ndirect or indirect changes in\nlaw made by the bill and to\nprohibit such report from\ncontaining any directive or\nlimitation affecting the ap-\npropriation that was not also\ncontained in the bill was\nheld germane, since the issue\nof the content of committee\nreports was within the pur-\nview of the amendment in\nthe nature of a substitute.\nThe proceedings of Oct. 8, 1974,\nrelating to House Resolution 988,\nto reform the structure, jurisdic-\ntion and procedures of House com-\nmittees, are discussed in § 3.37,\nsupra.\nHouse Procedures: Committee\nStage of Legislative ProcessÐ\nAmendment Relating to Vot-\ning Procedures in Committee\nof Whole\n§35.90 To a proposition reor-\nganizing House committees\nand dealing with the com-\nmittee stage of the legislative\nprocess, amended to delete\nreference to consideration of\nlegislation in Committee ofthe Whole, an amendment re-\nlating to voting procedures\nin the Committee of the\nWhole was held to be not ger-\nmane.\nOn Oct. 8, 1974,(18)the Com-\nmittee of the Whole had under\nconsideration House Resolution\n988, to reform the structure, juris-\ndiction and procedures of House\ncommittees. Pending was an\namendment in the nature of a\nsubstitute amending Rules X and\nXI and making conforming\nchanges in other rules to reform\nthe structure, jurisdiction and\nprocedures of committees, and\ncontaining miscellaneous provi-\nsions reorganizing certain institu-\ntional facilities of the House. The\namendment had been perfected by\namendment to eliminate a revi-\nsion of Rule XVI which had pro-\nposed changes in Committee of\nthe Whole procedure. Pursuant to\na point of order, the amendment\nin the nature of a substitute was\nheld not to be sufficiently broad in\nscope to admit as germane an\namendment to Rule VIII to permit\npairs on recorded votes in Com-\nmittee of the Whole.\nMR. [J ONATHAN B.] B INGHAM [of\nNew York]: Mr. Chairman, I offer an\namendment to the amendment in the\nnature of a substitute.\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01559 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8940DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n19.William H. Natcher (Ky.).The Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Bing-\nham to the amendment in the nature\nof a substitute offered by Mrs. Han-\nsen of Washington: On page 53, after\nline 2, insert the following:\n``PAIRS IN COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE\n``Sec. 209. The first sentence of\nclause 2 of rule VIII of the Rules of\nthe House of Representatives is\namended by inserting `by the House\nor Committee of the Whole' imme-\ndiately before the first comma.''. ..\nMR. [N EAL] S MITH of Iowa: Mr.\nChairman, I make a point of order\nagainst the amendment for the reason\nthat it is an amendment to rule VIII,\nwhereas the principal resolution under\nconsideration here, House Resolution\n988, attempts to amend rules X and XI\nonly. Therefore, the amendment is not\ngermane. ...\nMR. B INGHAM : . .. This would\namend title II of the resolution, which\nis headed, ``Miscellaneous and Con-\nforming Provisions.'' That title of the\nresolution is not limited to changes in\nrules X and XI. It affects other rules,\nsection 207, for example, amendment\nto rule XVI, and under the heading of\n``Miscellaneous and Conforming Provi-\nsions,'' it would seem to me that a sim-\nple amendment to rule VIII would\nclearly be in order.\nTHE CHAIRMAN :(19)The Chair is\nready to rule.\nOn hearing the gentleman from Iowa\n(Mr. Smith) and the gentleman from\nNew York (Mr. Bingham), the Chair is\nof the opinion that there is nothing in\nthe Hansen amendment in the nature\nof a substitute, as perfected, relating tovoting procedures in the Committee of\nthe Whole. The miscellaneous provi-\nsions in the Hansen amendment, as\nperfected by the Waggonner amend-\nment, do not broaden the Hansen\namendment to the extent suggested by\nthe gentleman from New York.\nTherefore, the point of order must be\nsustained, and the point of order is\nsustained.\nProposal To Amend House\nRules With Regard to Open\nHearingsÐAmendment Affect-\ning Investigative Funds for\nMinority Staff\n§35.91 To a proposition\namending existing law in\nseveral particulars but only\nwith regard to a single sub-\nject affected thereby, an\namendment proposing to\nmodify the law in a manner\nnot related to the subject of\nthe pending proposition is\nnot germane; this principle\nwas applied during consider-\nation of a resolution amend-\ning clauses 26 and 27 of Rule\nXI to require House com-\nmittee and subcommittee\nmeetings and hearings to be\nopen to the public except\nwhere the committee deter-\nmined by open rollcall vote\nthat the remainder of that\nmeeting or hearing be closed,\nwhere an amendment to\nclause 32(c) of that rule to\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01560 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8941AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n20.119 C ONG. REC. 6714, 93d Cong. 1st\nSess.provide that one-third of\neach standing committee's\ninvestigative funds be avail-\nable for minority staff was\nheld to be not germane.\nOn Mar. 7, 1973,(20)during con-\nsideration of a resolution amend-\ning several clauses of a rule of the\nHouse but confined in its scope to\nthe issue of access to committee\nmeetings and hearings, an amend-\nment to another clause of that\nrule relating to committee staffing\nwas held to be not germane. The\nproceedings were as follows:\nMR. [J OHN B.] A NDERSON of Illinois:\nMr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Ander-\nson of Illinois: On page 2, line 24,\nadd a new section 4, to read as fol-\nlows:\nClause 32(c) of rule XI of the Rules\nof the House of Representatives is\namended to read as follows:\n``(c) The minority party on any\nsuch standing committee is entitled,\nupon request of a majority of such\nminority, to up to one-third of the\nfunds provided for the appointment\nof committee staff pursuant to each\nprimary or additional expense reso-\nlution. The committee shall appoint\nany persons so selected whose char-\nacter and qualifications are accept-\nable to a majority of the committee.\nIf the committee determines that the\ncharacter and qualifications of any\nperson so selected are unacceptable\nto the committee, a majority of the\nminority party members may select\nother persons for appointment by thecommittee to the staff until such ap-\npointment is made. Each staff mem-\nber appointed under this subpara-\ngraph shall be assigned to such com-\nmittee business as the minority\nparty members of the committee con-\nsider advisable.''. . .\nMR. [J OHN J.] M CFALL [of Cali-\nfornia]: Mr. Chairman, I make a point\nof order against the amendment on the\nground that it is not germane to the\nmatter that we are considering. The\nmatter that we are considering has to\ndo with access to committee meetings,\nand the amendment has to do with\nstaff make-ups, and they are entirely\ntwo different subject matters. . . .\nMR. ANDERSON of Illinois: Mr. Chair-\nman, House Resolution 259, the resolu-\ntion we are considering today amends\ntwo clauses in rule XI of the Rules of\nthe House of Representatives. I am\nproposing another amendment to rule\nXI namely the provision dealing with\nminority staffing of committees.\nI contend this amendment is ger-\nmane and in order. Having only Can-\nnon's Procedure of the 87th Congress\navailable to me, I quote from page 201\nof that volume dealing with germane-\nness:\nBut where the bill proposes to\namend existing law in several par-\nticulars, no arbitrary rule can be laid\ndown either admitting or excluding\nfurther amendments to the law not\nproposed in the pending bill, but the\nquestion of the germaneness of such\nadditional amendments must be de-\ntermined in each instance on the\nmerits of the case presented (VIII,\n2938).\nThis ruling was made by Chairman\nSydney Anderson of Minnesota on\nJune 10, 1921. I quote from volume\nVIII of the Precedents:\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01561 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8942DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n1.Joe D. Waggoner, Jr. (La.).The Chair does not think that the\ngeneral rule can be laid down that\nwhere several portions of a law are\namended by a bill reported by a com-\nmittee, it is not in any case in order\nto amend another section of the bill\nnot included in the bill reported by\nthe committee, nor does the Chair\nthink that the opposite rule can be\nlaid down and rigidly applied in\nevery instance. The Chair thinks\nthat a question of this kind must be\ndetermined in every instance in the\nlight of the facts which are presented\nin the case. In the particular case\nunder consideration it appears that\nthe committee has reported a bill\nwhich amends several sections of\nTitle IV of the bill in various particu-\nlars. The Chair does not feel that he\ncan hold that no amendment to a\nsection not dealt with by the com-\nmittee is not in order.\nMr. Chairman, I feel my amendment\nwould clearly be in order.\nMr. Chairman, the substitute rule\nwould not make it possible for any\nother amendments to be made to rule\nXI.\nIt seems to me this further argues in\nfavor of the germaneness of this par-\nticular amendment. I ask that the\npoint of order be overruled.\nTHECHAIRMAN :(1)The Chair is pre-\npared to rule.\nHouse Resolution 259, while it tech-\nnically amends two different clauses of\nrule XI, relates solely to the single sub-\nject of public access to House com-\nmittee meetings and hearings. Thus,\namendments to other portions of rule\nXI pertaining to committee jurisdiction\nsuch as staffing, and procedures other\nthan access to hearings and meetings\nwould not be germane.\nUnder the precedents, the fact that a\nbill amends several sections of a lawdoes not necessarily open the whole\nlaw to amendment. The purpose and\nscope of the bill must be considered. In\nthe 89th Congress, the Committee of\nthe Whole had under consideration a\nbill amending the National Labor Rela-\ntions Act to repeal section 14(b) of that\nlaw. On that occasion, in several rul-\nings by Chairman O'Brien of New\nYork, the principal was reiterated that\nwhere a bill is amendatory of existing\nlaw in several particulars, but relates\nto a single subject affected thereby,\namendments proposing to modify the\nlaw but not related to the bill are not\ngermane (July 28, 1965, Rec. p. 18631±\n18645).\nFor this reason, the Chair holds that\nthe amendment is not germane and\nsustains the point of order.\nLaw Amended in Two Re-\nspectsÐAmendment To Add\nPostal Service Property to\nDefinition of Federal Prop-\nerty in Assessing ``Impact''\n§35.92 To a title of a bill\namending an existing law in\ntwo diverse respects, an\namendment further amend-\ning one section of the law\nbeing amended by the bill\nmay be germane; thus, an\namendment expanding the\ndefinition of federal property\nto include United States\nPostal Service property\nunder an educational assist-\nance program subsidizing\nschool districts where there\nis a federal ``impact'', was\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01562 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8943AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n2.The Vocational Education Act\namendments.\n3.122 C ONG. R EC. 13409±11, 13417,\n94th Cong. 2d Sess.held germane (but was ruled\nout as in violation of Rule\nXXI, clause 5, since permit-\nting a new use of funds al-\nready appropriated).\nDuring consideration of H.R.\n12835(2)in the Committee of the\nWhole on May 11, 1976,(3)the\nChair sustained a point of order\nagainst an amendment, as de-\nscribed above.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nTITLE IIIÐTECHNICAL AID AND\nMISCELLANEOUS EDUCATION\nAMENDMENTS; REPEALERS,\nEXTENSIONS, AND EFFECTIVE\nDATES\nTECHNICAL AMENDMENTS\nSec. 301. (a) The Education\nAmendments of 1974 is amended\n. . .\n(n) Section 403(17) of the Act of\nSeptember 30, 1950 (Public Law 874,\nEighty-first Congress), is amended\nby striking out ``(but not including''\nand inserting in lieu thereof ``; but at\nthe option of a local educational\nagency, such term need not include'';\nand such section is further amended\nby striking out ``residing in non-\nproject areas)'' and inserting in lieu\nthereof ``residing in noproject areas''.\n. . .\n(e)(1) Section 5(c)(1) of the Act of\nSeptember 30, 1950 (Public Law 874,\nEighty-first Congress), as amended\nby the Education Amendments of\n1974, is amended to read as follows:\n``(1) He shall first allocate to each\nlocal educational agency which is en-titled to a payment under section 2\nan amount equal to 100 per centum\nof the amount to which it is entitled\nas computed under that section for\nsuch fiscal year and he shall further\nallocate to each local educational\nagency which is entitled to a pay-\nment under section 3 an amount\nequal to 25 per centum of the\namount to which it is entitled as\ncomputed under section 3(d) for such\nfiscal year.''.\n(2) Section 5(c)(2) of such Act, as\nso amended, is amended (A) by strik-\ning out ``; and'' at the end of clause\n(F) and substituting a period, and\n(B) by striking out clause (G). . . .\nMR. [W ILLIAM D.] F ORD of Michigan:\nMr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Ford of\nMichigan: Page 190, immediately\nafter line 3, insert the following:\n(g) The fourth sentence of section\n403(1) (20 U.S.C. 244(1)) of the Act\nof September 30, 1950 (Public Law\n874, 81st Congress), is amended by\ninserting immediately before the pe-\nriod at the end thereof the following:\n``, except that such term shall in-\nclude all real property owned by the\nUnited States Postal Service which\nis not subject to any State or local\nreal property tax'' used for the sup-\nport of education. ...\nMR. [A LBERT H.] Q UIE [of Min-\nnesota]: Mr. Chairman, I make a point\nof order against the amendment of-\nfered by the gentleman from Michigan\n(Mr. Ford) on the grounds that it is not\ngermane to the bill under consider-\nation.\nThe gentleman's amendment seeks\nto amend the definitions title of impact\naid, Public Law 874 of the 81st Con-\ngress. The bill before us contains only\ntwo technical amendments to impact\naid. The amendment offered by the\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01563 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8944DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n4.B. F. Sisk (Calif.).gentleman from Michigan seeks to\nmake a major change in the impact aid\nlaw by substantially increasing pay-\nments under the program. The gen-\ntleman seeks to include his amend-\nment in title III, which relates to tech-\nnical and miscellaneous amendments.\nClearly, the amendment offered by the\ngentleman is not technical and is sub-\nstantial in nature.\nIt is my view that the amendment is\nin violation of clause 7 of rule XVI of\nthe Rules of the House of Representa-\ntives. I cite as precedent for my posi-\ntion the ruling of the Chair on Novem-\nber 29, 1971, when the Chair ruled\nthat an amendment to regulate a\nbroad scope of activities is not germane\nto a proposition imposing restrictions\nwithin a limited area of activities.\nI would also cite as a precedent the\nruling of the Chair on April 28, 1971,\nto the effect that an amendment pro-\nposing changes in another section of a\nlaw is not germane to a bill amending\none section of existing law to accom-\nplish a particular purpose. ...\nThe amendment is also in violation\nof clause 5 of rule XXI, relating to ap-\npropriations since the amendment is\neffective immediately and thereby af-\nfects already appropriated funds. ...\nTHECHAIRMAN :(4)The Chair is pre-\npared to rule.\nIn connection with the point of order\nthe gentleman from Minnesota makes\nregarding the question of germaneness,\nthe Chair has examined the amend-\nment and the legislation to which the\namendment is offered. Upon an exam-\nination of title III, which is a very di-\nverse title and is open to amendment\nat any point, that title actually amendsPublic Law 81±874 in two diverse re-\nspects, as indicated on pages 214 to\n217 of the Ramseyer rule in the com-\nmittee report, section 403 of that act is\namended in the bill on page 186. This\namendment would make a further\nchange in that section of the law.\nTherefore, on the basis of germane-\nness, it is the opinion of the Chair that\nthe amendment is germane; however,\nwith respect to the point of order that\nthe amendment violates clause 5, rule\nXXI, it appears to the Chair, recalling\nthe debate on the rule of yesterday\nwhere points of order were waived\nagainst the committee amendment,\nthat there are in existence appro-\npriated funds for impact aid purposes\nwhich this amendment would permit to\nbe used for a new category of recipi-\nents. Since the amendment permits a\nnew use of funds already appropriated,\nthe Chair would have to hold that that\namendment is a violation of clause 5,\nrule XXI and, therefore, would sustain\nthat portion of the point of order.\nNow, the Chair would state, of\ncourse, that we are dealing here with a\npoint of order dealing exclusively with\nthe reuse of funds already appro-\npriated.\nTherefore, the Chair sustains the\npoint of order in connection with clause\n5 of rule XXI.\nParliamentarian's Note: While\nthe bill was primarily a vocational\nEducation Act amendment and ex-\ntension, title III amended mis-\ncellaneous education laws, includ-\ning diverse laws on elementary\nand secondary education, and\nthus greatly broadened the scope\nof the bill.\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01564 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8945AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n5.121 C ONG. R EC. 30761, 30764,\n30767, 30768, 94th Cong. 1st Sess. 6.Walter Flowers (Ala.).Postal Reorganization Act\nAmended in Diverse Re-\nspectsÐAmendment to An-\nother Subsection of Act\n§35.93 A proposition amend-\ning the Postal Reorganiza-\ntion Act in several diverse\nrespects, considered as read\nand open to amendment at\nany point by unanimous con-\nsent, was considered suffi-\nciently comprehensive in\nscope to admit as germane\nan amendment to another\nsubsection of that Act to\nrender the entire Postal\nService operation subject to\nthe annual appropriation\nprocess, although the section\nof the proposition to which\noffered contained an annual\nauthorization only for a lim-\nited (public service) aspect of\nthe Postal Service operation.\nOn Sept. 29, 1975,(5)it was\ndemonstrated that the test of the\ngermaneness of an amendment is\nits relationship to the pending\nportion of a bill to which offered,\nand where a bill is by unanimous\nconsent considered as read and\nopen to amendment at any point,\nthe germaneness of an amend-\nment thereto is determined by its\nrelationship to the entire bill rath-er than to the particular section to\nwhich offered. The proceedings in\nthe Committee of the Whole were\nas follows:\nTHECHAIRMAN :(6)Pursuant to the\nrule, the Clerk will now read the com-\nmittee amendment in the nature of a\nsubstitute printed in the reported bill\nas an original bill for the purpose of\namendment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nBe it enacted by the Senate and\nHouse of Representatives of the\nUnited States of America in Congress\nassembled, That this Act may be\ncited as the ``Postal Reorganization\nAct Amendments of 1975''.\nSec. 2. Section 2401(b) of title 39,\nUnited States Code, is amended to\nread as follows:\n``(b)(1) There is authorized to be\nappropriated to the Postal Service\nfor the fiscal year ending June 30,\n1976, and for each of the fiscal years\nending September 30, 1977, 1978,\nand 1979, an amount equal to $35\nmultiplied by the number of delivery\naddresses estimated by the Postal\nService to be served during the fiscal\nyear involved. There is authorized to\nbe appropriated to the Postal Service\nfor the period commencing July 1,\n1976, and ending September 30,\n1976, an amount equal to one-fourth\nthe amount authorized under this\nsubsection for the fiscal year ending\nJune 30, 1976. ...\nMR. [J AMES M.] H ANLEY [of New\nYork] (during the reading): Mr. Chair-\nman, I ask unanimous consent that the\ncommittee amendment in the nature of\na substitute be considered as read,\nprinted in the Record, and open to\namendment at any point.\nTHECHAIRMAN : Is there objection to\nthe request of the gentleman from New\nYork?\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01565 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8946DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\nThere was no objection. . ..\nMR. [B ILL] ALEXANDER [of Arkansas]:\nMr. Chairman, I offer a perfecting\namendment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Alex-\nander: Page 12, strike out line 20\nand all that follows through page 13,\nline 6, and insert in lieu thereof the\nfollowing:\nSec. 2. (a)(1) Section 2401(a) of\ntitle 39, United States Code, is\namended to read as follows:\n``(a)(1) There are authorized to be\nappropriated to the Postal Service\nfor the fiscal year ending June 30,\n1976, such sums as may be nec-\nessary to enable the Postal Service\nto carry out the purposes, functions,\nand powers authorized by this title.\n...\n(b) Section 2401(b) of title 39,\nUnited States Code, is amended to\nread as follows:\n``(b)(1) There are authorized to be\nappropriated to the Postal Service\nsuch sums as may be necessary as\nreimbursement to the Postal Service\nfor public service costs incurred by it\nin providing a maximum degree of\neffective and regular postal service\nnationwide, in communities where\npost offices may not be deemed self-\nsustaining, as elsewhere.''. ..\nMR. HANLEY : Mr. Chairman, I raise\n[a] point of order on the grounds that\nthe matter contained in the amend-\nment is in violation of clause 7, rule\nXVI of the rules of the House, which\nprovides in part thatÐ\nNo motion or proposition on a sub-\nject different from that under consid-\neration shall be admitted under color\nof amendment.\nThe bill under consideration, H.R.\n8603, is narrow in scope since it re-\nlates only to the following specific sub-\nject matters.First, it provides authorization for\nincreased public service appropriations\nby changing the statutory formula cur-\nrently in existence.\nSecond, it would limit the amount of\nthe next temporary rate increase and\nwould establish new procedures and\nlimitations for the implementation of\nother future temporary postal rates.\nThird, it would amend the law with\nrespect to the Postal Rate Commission\nby changing its procedures to expedite\nrate and classification cases; by sub-\njecting the Commissioners to Senate\nconfirmation; and by expanding the\npowers of the Chairman in admin-\nistering the Commission. ...\nTHECHAIRMAN : The Chair is pre-\npared to rule.\nThe gentleman from New York (Mr.\nHanley) has made a point of order to\nthe amendment offered by the gen-\ntleman from Arkansas (Mr. Alexander)\nto section 2 of the bill. The gentleman's\npoint of order relates, in the Chair's\njudgment, primarily to the germane-\nness based upon the scope of the gen-\ntleman's amendment and as it relates\nto the scope of the bill, which bill is\nopen to amendment at any point.\nThe amendment offered by the gen-\ntleman from Arkansas (Mr. Alexander)\nactually amends section 2(a) of the bill,\nalthough section 2(a) of the Postal Act\nis not amended in the bill before the\nCommittee here this afternoon.\nThe Chair notes, however, as con-\nceded by the chairman of the sub-\ncommittee, there are several enumer-\nated purposes which touch upon many\ndifferent ramifications and aspects of\nthe postal law. These purposes are di-\nverse in nature.\nSince all of the bill is before the\nCommittee at this point, the Chair re-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01566 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8947AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n7.H.R. 244 (Committee on Post Office\nand Civil Service).\n8.97 C ONG. REC. 11773, 82d Cong. 1st\nSess., Sept. 20, 1951. 9.Clinton D. McKinnon (Calif.).luctantly comes to the conclusion that\nthe position of the gentleman from\nNew York (Mr. Hanley) in his point of\norder is not well founded and, there-\nfore, the Chair must overrule the point\nof order made by the gentleman from\nNew York.\nBill Affecting Salaries and\nNumber of Grades in Postal\nField ServiceÐAmendment\nRelating to Annual and Sick\nLeave\n§35.94 To a bill relating to the\nnumber of grades and posi-\ntions in the postal field serv-\nice and providing salary in-\ncreases for personnel in such\nservice, an amendment relat-\ning to annual and sick leave\nof such personnel was held\nto be not germane.\nIn the 82d Congress, a bill(7)\nwas under consideration which\nsought to amend the act of July 6,\n1945, as amended, so as to reduce\nthe number of grades for the var-\nious positions under such act. The\nfollowing amendment was offered\nto the bill:(8)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [Victor\nL.] Anfuso [of New York]:\nPage 10, after line 10, insert the fol-\nlowing:Sec. 4. (a) So much of section 6 of\nthe act entitled 'An act to reclassify\nthe salaries of postmasters, officers,\nand employees of the postal service\n... '' approved July 6, 1945, as\namended, as precedes the second\nparagraph thereof is hereby amend-\ned to read as follows:\n``ANNUAL AND SICKLEAVE\n``Sec. 6. Postmasters, officers, and\nemployees shall be granted 26 days'\nleave of absence with pay . .. each\nfiscal year and sick leave with pay at\nthe rate of 15 days a year. ...''\nA point of order was raised\nagainst the amendment, as fol-\nlows:\nMR. [T HOMAS J.] M URRAY [of Ten-\nnessee]: Mr. Chairman, I make the\npoint of order that the amendment of-\nfered by the gentleman from New York\nis not germane to the pending bill. It\ndoes not pertain to any provision of the\nbill now under consideration which re-\nlates only to salary and to reassign-\nment of the first three grades of Public\nLaw 134.\nThe Chairman,(9)in ruling on\nthe point of order, stated:\nAs the Chair stated before, this bill\nprovides for the number of grades and\npositions in the postal field service and\nalso provides salary increases for per-\nsonnel in such service.\nThe amendment offered by the gen-\ntleman from New York deals neither\nwith the number of grades or positions\nin the postal service nor with salary\nincreases as such. It concerns an en-\ntirely different matter, namely, annual\nand sick leave.\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01567 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8948DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n10.121 C ONG. R EC. 34031, 34036,\n34037, 94th Cong. 1st Sess.\n11.H.R. 6227.The Chair sustains the point of\norder.\nRights of Executive Branch\nEmployeesÐAmendment Af-\nfecting Legislative Branch\nEmployees\n§35.95 Unless a bill so exten-\nsively amends existing law as\nto open up the entire law to\namendment, the germane-\nness of an amendment to the\nbill depends upon its rela-\ntionship to the subject of the\nbill and not to the entire law\nbeing amended; thus, to a bill\namending a section of title 5,\nUnited States Code, granting\ncertain rights to employees\nof executive agencies of the\nfederal government, an\namendment extending those\nrights to legislative branch\nemployees, as defined in a\ndifferent section of that title,\nwas held to be beyond the\nscope of the bill and was\nruled out as not germane.\nOn Oct. 28, 1975,(10)during con-\nsideration of a bill(11)dealing with\nthe right to representation for fed-\neral executive employees during\nquestioning, the Chair, in ruling\nthat the amendment described\nabove was not germane to thatbill, reiterated the principle that\none individual proposition is not\ngermane to another individual\nproposition, even though the two\nbelong to the same class:\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nBe it enacted by the Senate and\nHouse of Representatives of the\nUnited States of America in Congress\nassembled, That (a) chapter 71 of\ntitle 5, United States Code, is\namended by adding at the end there-\nof the following new subchapter:\n``SUBCHAPTER IIIÐEMPLOYEE\nRIGHTS\n``§7171. Right to representation dur-\ning questioning\n``(a) Any employee of an Executive\nagency under investigation for mis-\nconduct which could lead to suspen-\nsion, removal, or reduction in rank\nor pay of such employee shall not be\nrequired to answer questions relat-\ning to the misconduct under inves-\ntigation unlessÐ\n``(1) the employee is advised in\nwriting ofÐ\n``(A) the fact that such employee is\nunder investigation for misconduct,\n``(B) the specific nature of such al-\nleged misconduct, and\n``(C) the rights such employee has\nunder paragraph (2) of this sub-\nsection, and\n``(2) the employee has been pro-\nvided reasonable time, not to exceed\n5 working days, to obtain a rep-\nresentative of his choice, and is al-\nlowed to have such representative\npresent during such questioning, if\nhe so elects. . ..\nMR. [R OBIN L.] B EARD of Tennessee:\nMadam Chairman, I offer an amend-\nment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Beard\nof Tennessee: on page 1, line 8 insert\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01568 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8949AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n12.Barbara Jordan (Tex.).immediately following the word\n``agency'' the following: ``, or any em-\nployee as defined under section 2107\nof this Title.''.\nMR. C HARLES H. W ILSON of Cali-\nfornia: Madam Chairman, I have a\npoint of order against the amendment.\n...\nMadam Chairman, under rule XVI,\nclause 7, of the Rules of the House,\nany amendment to a bill concerning a\nsubject different from those contained\nin the bill is not germane and is sub-\nject to a point of order. The instant\namendment proposes to make the bill\napplicable to a completely new class of\nemployees other than what is covered\nunder the bill, namely, congressional\nemployees. However, the reported bill\napplies only to employees of executive\nagencies as defined under section 105.\nIn my opinion, the subject of the\namendment is not similar to any of the\nsubject matters involved in H.R. 6227\nwhich I have just outlined and is not\ngermane. ...\nMR. B EARD of Tennessee: . ..\nMadam Chairman, I feel the amend-\nment is germane to this particular bill\ninasmuch as the people we are includ-\ning in this bill are Federal employees\nand those concerning whom we are leg-\nislating today are Federal employees.\n...\nMadam Chairman, if I may be heard\nfurther on the point of order, all this\ndoes is to remove an exemption rather\nthan add a group of employees. It is\njust removing an exemption, and I be-\nlieve that is the fair thing to do.\nTHECHAIRMAN :(12)The Chair is pre-\npared to rule.\nThe bill before us is very explicit as\nto its scope. It includes any employeeof an executive agency. The bill itself,\nby its own terms, affects the class of\ncivil servants known as executive\nagency employees.\nThe amendment offered by the gen-\ntleman from Tennessee (Mr. Beard)\nwould seek to amend the bill by adding\na totally different individual class of\nemployees to the bill beyond the scope\nof the bill, namely, congressional em-\nployees as defined in section 2107.\nThe rule of germaneness, in terms of\namendments of this kind, states as fol-\nlows: One individual proposition may\nnot be amended by another individual\nproposition, even though the two be-\nlong to the same class.\nIn light of that principle and in light\nof the scope of this bill, the Chair rules\nthat this amendment is not germane\nand is, therefore, out of order. ...\nMR. [J OHN H.] R OUSSELOT [of Cali-\nfornia]: Madam Chairman, respecting\nthe chairperson's ruling, in regard to\ntitle V to which this bill addresses\nitself, an amendment to title V in-\ncludes all employees, including the\nPresident, Members of Congress, and\nmembers of the uniformed services,\neven though this bill has application,\nas the gentlewoman has said, only to\nFederal employees. Therefore, this title\nV does apply to all Federal employees.\n...\nTHECHAIRMAN : To the gentleman\nfrom California (Mr. Rousselot) the\nChair would only state that the ger-\nmaneness of the amendment must be\nweighed against the content and scope\nof the bill and not title V of the United\nStates Code, as the gentleman would\ninterpret it.\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01569 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8950DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n13.S. 2505 (Committee on the Census).\n14.86 C ONG. REC. 4382, 76th Cong. 3d\nSess.\n15.Marvin Jones (Tex.).16.86 C ONG. R EC. 4383, 4384, 76th\nCong. 3d Sess.Census and Apportionment:\nAmendment To Modify Law in\nManner Not Related to Bill\n§35.96 To a bill proposing to\namend an act in several par-\nticulars an amendment pro-\nposing to modify the act but\nnot related to the bill is not\ngermane.\nIn the 76th Congress, a bill(13)\nwas under consideration pro-\nposing to amend an act relating to\nthe decennial census and the ap-\nportionment of Representatives in\nCongress. The following pro-\nceedings took place on Apr. 11,\n1940:(14)\nTHECHAIRMAN :(15)... The Clerk\nwill read.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nThat an act to provide for the fif-\nteenth and subsequent decennial\ncensuses and to provide for appor-\ntionment of Representatives in Con-\ngress, approved June 18, 1929, is\nhereby amended in the first sentence\nof section 22(a) by striking out the\nwords ``second regular session of the\nSeventy-first Congress'' and sub-\nstituting the following words: ``first\nregular session of the Seventy-sev-\nenth Congress'', and by striking out\n``fifteenth'' and inserting ``sixteenth.''\nMR. [J AMES W.] M OTT [of Oregon]:\nMr. Chairman, I offer the following\namendment, which I send to the desk.The Clerk read as follows: ...\nThe said act is further amended in\nthe first sentence of section 22(a) by\nstriking out the words, ``the then ex-\nisting number of Representatives''\nand substituting the following words,\n``300 Representatives.''\nMR. [L INDSAY C.] W ARREN [of North\nCarolina]: Mr. Chairman, I make the\npoint of order against the amendment\nthat it is not germane. ...\nIn ruling on the point of order,\nthe Chairman, stated:(16)\nThere is no question that the amend-\nment would have been germane to the\nact of 1929. The precedents, however,\nseem to be very definite on the propo-\nsition that when a bill proposes to\namend an act in several particulars an\namendment proposing to modify the\nact but not related to the bill is not\ngermane. ...\nThe pending section of the bill does\nnot in any way affect the total number\nof Members of the House but only pro-\nposes to change the time when the\nstatement of the President must be\ntransmitted to Congress. The Chair is\nof the opinion therefore that the\namendment is not germane and sus-\ntains the point of order.\nDistrict of Columbia: Bill Con-\nferring Broad Powers on New\nCommunity Development and\nFinance CorporationÐ\nAmendment Limiting Author-\nity of District of Columbia\nCouncil Over Parking\n§35.97 To a bill conferring\nbroad powers on a new Com-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01570 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8951AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n17.120 C ONG. REC. 35216±19, 93d Cong.\n2d Sess.\n18.Sidney R. Yates (Ill.).munity Development and Fi-\nnance Corporation for the\nDistrict of Columbia and nar-\nrowly affecting the powers of\nthe District of Columbia\nCouncil to the extent that it\nwould only be preempted\nfrom interfering with con-\ngressional approval author-\nity over projects proposed by\nthe Corporation, an amend-\nment limiting the authority\nof the Council (and not the\nCorporation) over all park-\ning in the District of Colum-\nbia and not confined to the\nCorporation's authority over\nparking and the Council's re-\nlation thereto was held to go\nbeyond the scope of the bill\nand was held to be not ger-\nmane.\nOn Oct. 10, 1974,(17)during con-\nsideration of H.R. 15888 in the\nCommittee of the Whole, the\nChair sustained a point of order\nin the circumstances described\nabove. The proceedings were as\nfollows:\nTHECHAIRMAN :(18)The Clerk will re-\nport the committee amendments.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nCommittee amendments: On page\n2, in the table of contents, insert\n``Sec. 309. Audits.'' immediately fol-\nlowing ``Sec. 308. Annual report.''. ..``POWERS OF THE COUNCIL\n``Sec. 313. Notwithstanding any\nother provision of law, or any rule of\nlaw, nothing in this Act shall be con-\nstrued as limiting the authority of\nthe District of Columbia Council to\nenact any act, resolution, or regula-\ntion, after January 2, 1975, pursuant\nto the District of Columbia Self-Gov-\nernment and Governmental Reorga-\nnization Act with respect to any mat-\nter covered by this Act.''\nTHECHAIRMAN : The question is on\nthe committee amendments.\nThe committee amendments were\nagreed to. ...\nMR. [W ALTER E.] F AUNTROY [Dele-\ngate from the District of Columbia]:\nMr. Chairman, I offer a series of\namendments and ask unanimous con-\nsent that they may be considered en\nbloc.\nTHECHAIRMAN : Is there objection to\nthe request of the Delegate from the\nDistrict of Columbia?\nThere was no objection.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendments offered by Mr.\nFauntroy: Page 33, after line 21, in-\nsert the following:\nRESERVATION OF CONGRESSIONAL\nAUTHORITY\nSec. 303. (a) The corporation shall\nnot undertake any project unless\nsuch project, including a cost esti-\nmate, has been submitted by the cor-\nporation to, and has been approved\nby, the Committees on Appropria-\ntions of the House of Representatives\nand the Senate.\n(b) Nothing in this Act shall be\nconstrued as amending or modifying\nthe financing, appropriation, or\nbudget process of the government of\nthe District of Columbia, as estab-\nlished in parts D and E of title IV,\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01571 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8952DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\nand section 603 of the District of Co-\nlumbia Self-Government and Gov-\nernmental Reorganization Act.\nPage 41, immediately after line 26,\ninsert the following:\n(b) Notwithstanding any provision\nof the District of Columbia Self-Gov-\nernment and Governmental Reorga-\nnization Act, the District of Colum-\nbia Council shall have no authority\nto modify or amend the provisions of\nsection 303 of this Act. ...\nThe amendments were agreed to.\nMR. [S TANFORD E.] P ARRIS [of Vir-\nginia]: Mr. Chairman, I offer amend-\nments and ask unanimous consent that\nthe amendments be considered en bloc.\nTHECHAIRMAN : Is there objection to\nthe request of the gentleman from Vir-\nginia?\nThere was no objection.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendments offered by Mr. Par-\nris: Page 41, at the end of section\n313, insert the following:\n``(c) Notwithstanding any other\nprovisions of law, the District of Co-\nlumbia Council (established under\nReorganization Plan Numbered 3 of\n1967) and, after January 2, 1975, the\nCouncil of the District of Columbia\nestablished under the District of Co-\nlumbia Self-Government and Gov-\nernmental Reorganization Act, shall\nhave no authority to adopt any rule\nor regulation with respect to the uti-\nlization of parking facilities (includ-\ning on-street and off-street parking)\nwithin the District of Columbia\nwhich is more restrictive upon non-\nresidents of the District of Columbia\nthan residents of the District of Co-\nlumbia. Notwithstanding any provi-\nsion of the District of Columbia Self-\nGovernment and Governmental Re-\norganization Act, the Council of the\nDistrict of Columbia shall have no\nauthority to modify or amend the\nprovisions of this subsection.''MR. [C HARLES C.] D IGGS [Jr., of\nMichigan]: Mr. Chairman, I make a\npoint of order against the amendment\non the ground that it is nongermane.\nThe purpose of H.R. 15888 is to accom-\nplish several specific goals, including\nthe development of low- and moderate-\nincome housing, increase employment\nopportunities for District residents,\nand the development of substandard\nand blighted residential, commercial,\nand industrial areas in our National\nCapital in time for our Nation's Bicen-\ntennial. Clearly, the powers conferred\non the proposed Corporation are spe-\ncifically subject to the limited and cir-\ncumscribed purpose in the provisions\nof the bill. Accordingly, we must read\nthe powers of the bill contained in sec-\ntion 201 in the context of the purposes\nand findings contained in section 102.\nNowhere do we find a statement that\nthe Corporation may engage in estab-\nlishing parking facilities or the regula-\ntion thereof. To argue that the powers\nare so broad as to allow an amendment\nwhich purpose is to restrict the overall\npowers of the Council is, in my view,\noutside of the purposes of H.R. 15888\nand therefore nongermane. ...\nAny amendment which seeks to deal\nwith Council authority over parking in\nareas under the control of the United\nStates or the District of Columbia gov-\nernment, which would include the\nstreets of the District, clearly goes be-\nyond the limited powers granted the\nCorporation under this act. Accord-\ningly, it would be nongermane. ...\nMR. PARRIS : ... Section 313 of H.R.\n15888, as amended by my colleague,\nMr. Fauntroy, providing for a sub-\nsection b to section 313, directly and\nexpressly limits and thereby amends\nthe District of Columbia Self-Govern-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01572 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8953AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\nment and Governmental Reorganiza-\ntion Act, as it relates to provisions of\nH.R. 15888.\nMy amendment does no more and\ngoes no further than does the amend-\nment submitted by Mr. Fauntroy.\nWith respect to the developmental\npowers that may be exercised by the\nDistrict of Columbia Community De-\nvelopment and Finance Corporation\nand according to the provisions of the\nact and as stated in the report on page\n7, that corporation which is an instru-\nmentality of the District government\nmay:\n18. Construct, manage or operate\npublic facilities for the District gov-\nernment or any other public body, at\nits request.\nAs I read this and as any responsible\nman would read this, the District gov-\nernment, if it wishes, could by enact-\nment or regulation permit this instru-\nmentality of the District of Columbia,\nthe District of Columbia Development\nand Finance Corporation, to manage\nand operate parking facilities in the\nDistrict of Columbia, be they on public\nproperty such as those where meters\nnow exist or other public property in\nresidential areas where a ban on non-\nresidential parking could be imposed.\nItem 17 on page 7 of the report indi-\ncated that the corporation may:\nManage its own property, or to\nenter into agreement with the Dis-\ntrict of Columbia government or a\nprivate entity for the management of\nproperty.\nHere again, this would certainly per-\nmit this corporation to engage in the\nmanagement of on-street parking in\nthe District of Columbia in either com-\nmercial or residential areas at the di-rection and discretion of the District of\nColumbia government and this cor-\nporation which is its instrumentality.\n...\nMr. Chairman, I submit that title II\nof H.R. 15888 is so broad and so gen-\neral that it permits this corporation,\nwhich it establishes, to perform nearly\nany function that the District of Co-\nlumbia government itself could per-\nform, because by and large such pow-\ners and authority could be delegated to\nit if, in fact, title II of the bill does not\ndirectly and expressly give those pow-\ners to that corporation. ...\nTHECHAIRMAN : The gentleman from\nMichigan makes a point of order\nagainst the amendment offered by the\ngentleman from Virginia.\nThe amendment offered by the gen-\ntleman from Virginia directly limits\nthe powers of the present District of\nColumbia Council, and of the Council\nto be established under the Home Rule\nAct, to regulate all parking facilities\nwithin the District of Columbia. The\nbill H.R. 15888, which the gentleman's\namendment seeks to amend, estab-\nlishes a Community Development and\nFinance Corporation and gives such\ncorporation certain powers. It does not\nappear to the Chair that the scope of\nthe bill extends to regulation, either by\nthe Corporation or by the City Council,\nof all parking within the District of Co-\nlumbia.\nThe amendment offered by the gen-\ntleman from Virginia does not even\nmention the powers of the Corporation\nwhich is the primary subject of H.R.\n15888, but limits instead the powers of\nthe City Council. While a narrowly\ndrawn amendment limiting the power\nof the Corporation to institute parking\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01573 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8954DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\nregulations over lands within its juris-\ndiction might be germane, the issue of\nthe overall powers of the District of Co-\nlumbia Council, as to all areas of regu-\nlation, is not comprehended in the bill.\nThe gentleman from Virginia has ar-\ngued that the amendment already in-\ncorporated into the bill is similar to his\namendment, and that his amendment\nno more limits the powers of the Coun-\ncil or amends the Home Rule Act than\ndoes the adopted amendment. The new\nsection 303, added by amendment of\nthe gentleman from the District of Co-\nlumbia, only limits the powers of the\nCouncil as to the requirement that\nprojects which the Corporation is au-\nthorized to undertake be submitted for\napproval to congressional committees.\nThe new section 303 directly relates to\nthe financing of projects authorized in\nthe bill, and the section further states\nthat the Council may not change the\nrequirement of submission for congres-\nsional approval. It does not appear to\nthe Chair that that provision in any\nway amends the powers of the Council\nunder the Home Rule Act or that it\ntouches on any subject not in the bill\nH.R. 15888.\nSection 313, added by committee\namendment to specify that the bill\ndoes not preempt the legislative au-\nthority conferred on the City Council\nunder the Home Rule Act, does not\nbring the subject of the general powers\nof the City Council under the Home\nRule Act within the purview of the bill,\nexcept to the extent that the Council\nmay or may not control the activities of\nthe Corporation.\nFor the reasons stated, the Chair\nsustains the point of order.Restrictions on Funds for\nLegal Services CorporationÐ\nAmendment Making Criminal\nand Civil Laws Applicable to\nCorporation\n§35.98 To a Senate amend-\nment to a general appropria-\ntion bill subjecting funds for\nthe Legal Services Corpora-\ntion to a comprehensive se-\nries of restrictions on its ac-\ntivities for that fiscal year\nand reconstituting its board\nof directors, a proposed\namendment also applying to\nthat corporation ``with re-\nspect to the use of funds in\nthe bill'' certain substantive\nprovisions of Federal crimi-\nnal and civil law not other-\nwise applicable to it was held\nnot germane.\nThe proceedings of Oct. 26,\n1989, relating to the conference\nreport on H.R. 2991, Departments\nof Commerce, Justice, and State,\nthe Judiciary, and Related Agen-\ncies Appropriations Act, 1990, are\ndiscussed in § 34.37, supra.\nLaws Governing Handguns\nMade Applicable to RiflesÐ\nAmendment Requiring Fire-\narm Registration\n§35.99 To a bill which sought,\nas part of a comprehensive\nscheme for the regulation of\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01574 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8955AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n19. H.R. 17735 (Committee on the Judici-\nary).\n20. See 114 C ONG. REC. 22248, 22249,\n90th Cong. 2d Sess., July 19, 1968.\n1.Id. at p. 22249.2.John J. Rooney (N.Y.).\n3.114 C ONG. REC. 22249, 22250, 90th\nCong. 2d Sess., July 19, 1968.transfers of firearms, to ex-\ntend the provisions of exist-\ning law governing handguns\nto transactions involving ri-\nfles and shotguns and to\nspecify regulations for the\nidentification of firearms by\nimporters and manufactur-\ners, an amendment requiring\nregistration of firearms by\nthe purchasers thereof was\nheld to be an extension of\nmatter already carried in the\nbill and therefore germane.\nIn the 90th Congress, during\nconsideration of the State Fire-\narms Control Assistance Act of\n1968,(19)an amendment was of-\nfered which stated in part:(20)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [Robert]\nMcClory [of Illinois]: . . . On page 32,\nafter line 11, insert the following:\nCHAPTER 44AÐR EGISTRATION OF\nHANDGUNS\nSec.\n931. Definitions\n932. Registration . ..\n§932. Registration.Ð(a) It is un-\nlawful for a person knowingly to pos-\nsess a firearm not registered in ac-\ncordance with the provisions of this\nsection. ...\nA point of order was raised\nagainst the amendment, as fol-\nlows:(1)MR. [J OHN D.] D INGELL [of Michi-\ngan]: Mr. Chairman, the fundamental\npurpose of the amendment must be\ngermane to the bill. Here the amend-\nment goes far beyond the purposes of\nthe bill and imposes a whole new se-\nries of responsibilities on the Sec-\nretary, including registration of fire-\narms. . . .\nI submit, in conclusion, the [amend-\nment] offered by my friend goes far be-\nyond the matter before the House,\ncompels entirely new duties and re-\nsponsibilities, adds entirely new class-\nes of persons, creates entirely new reg-\nulatory problems, and, indeed, ad-\nvances and enhances in enormous\nmanner the scope of the bill, far be-\nyond that which was submitted to this\nbody and far beyond that which was\ncontemplated by the committee.\nThe Chairman,(2)in ruling on\nthe point of order, stated:(3)\n. . . [T]he bill which the Committee\nof the Whole is now considering seeks\nto regulate the various transactions in-\nvolving rifles, shotguns, and handguns.\nIt provides for the identification of\nsuch firearms by manufacturers and\nimporters and, as amended by the\nCommittee on the Judiciary and by\nthis committee earlier this afternoon,\nspecifies that this identification shall\ninclude serial numbers. Licensed im-\nporters, dealers, and manufacturers\nare required to retain descriptions of\nthe firearms with which they deal.\nThe amendment proposed by the\ngentleman from Illinois [Mr. McClory]\nis drafted as a further amendment to\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01575 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8956DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n4.S. 3293 (Committee on Armed Serv-\nices).\n5.See 114 C ONG. R EC. 20761, 90th\nCong. 2d Sess., July 11, 1968.title 18, United States Code, the same\nportion of the Code amended by the\npending bill. It carries the concept of\nregistration or identification to the per-\nsons having handguns in their posses-\nsion. The system of registration estab-\nlished by the amendment would be\nunder the jurisdiction of the Secretary\nof the Treasury, the same officer des-\nignated for this purpose by the bill.\nThe Chair notes that the bill makes\nat least three major innovations in the\nexisting law concerning gun control: it\nextends that law with respect to trans-\nactions in rifles and shotguns; it brings\nammunition within the scheme of the\nlaw; and it modifies the law regarding\nshipment and sale of destructive de-\nvices. Since present law is modified in\nthe foregoing ways, an additional\nchange in the law and the billÐa\nchange that is an extension of a sub-\nject already carried in the billÐis ger-\nmane.\nThe Chair therefore overrules the\npoint of order.\nDisposal of Surplus Military\nEquipmentÐAmendment Pro-\nhibiting Transfer of Surplus\nGuns\n§35.100 To a bill authorizing\nappropriations for military\nprocurement and containing\nprovisions modifying exist-\ning law with respect to the\ndisposal of surplus military\nequipment, an amendment\nproposing a further modi-\nfication of that law to pro-\nhibit the transfer of surplusguns and ammunition to in-\ndividuals, clubs or organiza-\ntions was held to be ger-\nmane.\nIn the 90th Congress, a bill(4)\nwas under consideration relating\nto military procurement author-\nization for fiscal 1969. The bill\nstated in part as follows:(5)\nTITLE IIÐR ESEARCH , DEVELOPMENT ,\nTEST, AND EVALUATION\nSec. 201. Funds are hereby author-\nized to be appropriated during the fis-\ncal year 1969 for the use of the Armed\nForces of the United States for re-\nsearch, development, test, and evalua-\ntion, as authorized by law in amounts\nas follows:\nFor the Army, $1,641,900,000. . . .\nTITLE IVÐG ENERAL PROVISIONS\nSec. 404. (a) Chapter 163 of title 10,\nUnited States Code, is amended by\nadding at the end thereof the following\nnew section:\n§2576. Obsolete and surplus mili-\ntary equipment: sale to State, local\nlaw enforcement, and firefighting\nagencies\n(a) The Secretary of Defense . . .\nshall sell to State, local law enforce-\nment and firefighting agencies, at\nfair market value, obsolete and sur-\nplus military equipment. . . .\n(b) Obsolete and surplus military\nequipment shall not be sold under\nthe provisions of this section to a\nState, local law enforcement or fire-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01576 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8957AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n6.Id. at p. 20767.\n7.Daniel D. Rostenkowski (Ill.).8.H.R. 421 (Committee on the Judici-\nary).\n9.See the amendment at 113 C ONG.\nREC. 19408±12, 90th Cong. 1st Sess.,\nJuly 19, 1967.\n10.Id. at p. 19412.fighting agency unless request there-\nfor is made by such agency, in such\nform and manner as the Secretary of\nDefense shall prescribe. . . . Such\nequipment may not be sold, or other-\nwise transferred, by such agency to\nany individual or public or private\norganization or agency.\nThe following amendment was\noffered to the bill:(6)\nAmendment offered by Mr. [Sidney\nR.] Yates [of Illinois]: On page 11, line\n17, strike out the period and substitute\na comma and insert the following:\n``Provided, however , That no surplus or\nobsolete military guns or ammunition\nshall be sold or loaned or otherwise\ntransferred to any private individual,\nassociation, board, club, or organiza-\ntion.''\nA point of order was raised\nagainst the amendment, as fol-\nlows:\nMR. [D URWARD G.] H ALL [of Mis-\nsouri]: ...[T]he amendment is out of\norder because this is an amendment\npertaining to the domestic distribution\nof firearms and firefighting equipment.\nIt is not consistent with the essence of\nthe bill as prescribed under section\n2576 and the actions of the Secretary\nof Defense.\nThe Chairman,(7)in ruling on\nthe point of order, stated:\nThe whole section ...deals with\nobsolete and surplus military equip-\nment. This is a further limitation on\nthat. The Chair overrules the point of\norder.Penalties for Inciting RiotÐ\nGun Control Amendment\n§35.101 To a bill amending a\ntitle of the United States\nCode to provide penalties for\ntravel in or use of interstate\nfacilities with intent to incite\na riot, an amendment which\nsought to control and regu-\nlate the shipment of firearms\nin interstate commerce was\nheld to be not germane.\nIn the 90th Congress, during\nconsideration of a bill(8)amending\nTitle 18 of the United States Code\nand making it a crime to travel in\nor use interstate facilities with\nthe intent to incite a riot, an\namendment was offered which\nsought to add to Title 18 a com-\nprehensive gun control law and to\nrepeal the Federal Firearms Act,\nfound in Title 15.(9)Mr. Edwin E.\nWillis, of Louisiana, reserved a\npoint of order against the amend-\nment.(10)The following exchange\nensued:\nMR. [H AROLD R.] G ROSS [of Iowa]:\nMr. Chairman, I make the point of\norder against the amendment on the\ngrounds that the amendment is not\ngermane to the pending legislation.\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01577 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8958DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n11.Joseph L. Evins (Tenn.).\n12.113 C ONG. REC. 19413, 90th Cong.\n1st Sess., July 19, 1967.MR. W ILLIS : That is the reservation\nthat I had in mind.\nMR. GROSS : I have no reservation, I\nam making the point of order.\nMR. WILLIS : All right.\nThe proponent of the amend-\nment, Mr. Richard D. McCarthy,\nof New York, stated in response to\nthe point of order:\nMr. Chairman, this amendment is\ngermane because the pattern of these\nriots is clear. Guerrilla warfare in the\nstreets with snipers pouring deadly\ngunfire from roofs. ...\nAfter some further remarks,\nand in response to objections of\nMr. Gross, the Chairman(11)made\nthe request that Mr. McCarthy\n``confine his remarks to the point\nof order.''\nSpeaking in support of the point\nof order, Mr. Willis stated:(12)\nThe bill before the Committee is one\nwhich proscribes travel by people\nacross State lines in furtherance of ri-\noting.\nThe amendment would add a new\nchapter, chapter 102, to title 18 of the\nCode under the subject of ``Riots.'' The\nwords ``Chapter 102 of the Code'' are\nnot even mentioned in this strange and\ncompletely disassociated amend-\nment. ...\nThe following exchange, di-\nrected to the point of order, con-\ncerned the meaning of the terms\nof the bill:MR. [A NDREW ] JACOBS [Jr., of Indi-\nana]: ...If a rifle, which is an inte-\ngral part of effective and deadly riot, is\nshipped in interstate commerce, it\nseems to me that it does relate to a fa-\ncility in interstate or foreign com-\nmerce, the shipment of which is with\nthe intent to incite a riot or other vio-\nlent disturbance, and that therefore\nthe amendment . .. is germane. ...\nMR. [T HOMAS S.] F OLEY [of Wash-\nington]: ...[T]he use of ``facility'' in\nthe bill before the committee is de-\nsigned to mean a facility of transpor-\ntation or communication and not a fa-\ncility such as an instrument of fire-\narms. ...\nThe Chairman, in ruling on the\npoint of order, stated:\nThe committee has before it H.R.\n421, a bill which adds a new chapter\nentitled ``Riots'' to title 18, United\nStates Code, and it makes certain ac-\ntivities in interstate commerce unlaw-\nful, and specific penalties are provided.\nThe amendment offered by the gen-\ntleman from New York [Mr. McCarthy]\nmakes unlawful certain actions and\ndeals in sale and transportation in\ninterstate and foreign commerce of\nfirearms or ammunition. The amend-\nment provides a comprehensive legisla-\ntive scheme for control for interstate\nshipment of firearms.\nThe Chair feels that the amendment\ncomes within the rule of germaneness,\nwherein it is said that one individual\nproposition may not be amended by an-\nother individual proposition even\nthough the two belong to the same\nclass. ...\n...[T]he Chair feels that while\n[the bill and the amendment] are simi-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01578 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8959AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n13.136 C ONG. REC. p. Ð, 101st Cong. 2d\nSess.\n14.H.R. 5422.lar, there are differences ...and the\nChair sustains the point of order.\nDiverse Amendments to Laws\nRelating to Intelligence Com-\nmunityÐAmendments Relat-\ning to Accountability for In-\ntelligence Activities\n§35.102 To a proposition deal-\ning with a subject matter by\ndiverse changes in existing\nlaws, an amendment relating\nto that same general subject\nmatter may be germane al-\nthough including additional\nchanges in law not contained\nin the bill; thus, to a bill au-\nthorizing funding for the in-\ntelligence community for one\nfiscal year and making di-\nverse changes in permanent\nlaws relating to the intel-\nligence community (includ-\ning laws concerning congres-\nsional oversight of certain in-\ntelligence activities), an\namendment changing an-\nother permanent law to ad-\ndress accountability for in-\ntelligence activities was held\ngermane.\nOn Oct. 17, 1990,(13)during con-\nsideration of the Intelligence Au-\nthorization Act of 1991(14)in the\nCommittee of the Whole, theChair overruled a point of order\nagainst the amendment described\nabove. The proceedings were as\nfollows:\nThe text of the bill is as fol-\nlows: ...\nTITLE IÐINTELLIGENCE\nACTIVITIES\nSEC. 101. A UTHORIZATION OF APPRO -\nPRIATIONS .\nFunds are hereby authorized to be\nappropriated for fiscal year 1991 for\nthe conduct of the intelligence and\nintelligence-related activities of the\nfollowing elements of the United\nStates Government:\n(1) The Central Intelligence Agen-\ncy.\n(2) The Department of Defense.\n(3) The Defense Intelligence Agen-\ncy....\nTITLE IIÐINTELLIGENCE\nCOMMUNITY STAFF\nSEC. 201. A UTHORIZATION OF APPRO -\nPRIATIONS .\nThere are authorized to be appro-\npriated for the Intelligence Commu-\nnity Staff for fiscal year 1991\n$27,900,000.\nSEC. 202. A UTHORIZATION OF PER-\nSONNEL ENDSTRENGTH\nTITLE IIIÐCENTRAL INTEL-\nLIGENCE AGENCY RETIRE-\nMENT AND DISABILITY SYS-\nTEM AND RELATED PROVI-\nSIONS\nSEC. 301 AUTHORIZATION OF AP-\nPROPRIATIONS.\nThere are authorized to be appro-\npriated for the Central Intelligence\nAgency Retirement and Disability\nFund for fiscal year 1991\n$164,600,000. ...\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01579 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8960DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\nTITLE IVÐGENERAL\nPROVISIONS\nSEC. 401. I NCREASE IN EMPLOYEE\nCOMPENSATION AND BENEFITS AU-\nTHORIZED BYLAW.\nAppropriations authorized by this\nAct for salary, pay, retirement, and\nother benefits for federal employees\nmay be increased by such additional\nor supplemental amounts as may be\nnecessary for increases in such com-\npensation or benefits authorized by\nlaw. ...\nTITLE VÐDEPARTMENT OF DE-\nFENSE INTELLIGENCE PROVI-\nSIONS\nSEC. 501. R EIMBURSEMENT RATEFOR\nCERTAIN AIRLIFT SERVICE .\n(a) The Secretary of Defense is au-\nthorized to grant the use of the De-\npartment of Defense reimbursement\nrate for military airlift services pro-\nvided by the Department of Defense\nto the Central Intelligence Agency if\nthe Secretary of Defense determines\nthat such services are provided in\nsupport of authorized intelligence ac-\ntivities. ...\nSEC. 502. P UBLIC AVAILABILITY OF\nMAPS, ETC., P RODUCED BYDEFENSE\nMAPPING AGENCY .\n(A) In General.Ð(1) Chapter 167\nof title 10, United States Code, is\namended by adding at the end the\nfollowing new section:\n``§2796. Maps, charts, and geodetic\ndata: public availability; exceptions\n``(a) The Defense Mapping Agency\nshall offer for sale maps and charts\nat scales of 1:500,000 and smaller,\nexcept those withheld in accordance\nwith subsection (b) or those specifi-\ncally authorized under criteria estab-\nlished by Executive order to be kept\nsecret in the interest of national de-\nfense or foreign policy and in fact\nproperly classified pursuant to such\nExecutive order.SEC. 503. USE OF COMMERCIAL AC -\nTIVITIES AS COVER SUPPORT FOR IN -\nTELLIGENCE COLLECTION ACTIVITIES\nOF THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE .\n(a) In General.ÐChapter 21 of\ntitle 10, United States Code, is\namended ...\n(2) by adding at the end the fol-\nlowing:\n``SUBCHAPTER IIÐINTEL-\nLIGENCE COMMERCIAL AC-\nTIVITIES\n``431. Authority to engage in com-\nmercial activities as security for de-\nfense intelligence collection\nactivities ...\n``§437. Congressional oversight\n``(a) Proposed Regulations.ÐCopies\nof regulations proposed to be pre-\nscribed under section 436 of this title\n(including any proposed revision to\nsuch regulations) shall be submitted\nto the intelligence committees not\nless than 30 days before they take\neffect. ...\n``(c) Annual Report.ÐNot later\nthan January 15 of each year, the\nSecretary shall submit to the intel-\nligence committees a report on all\ncommercial activities authorized\nunder this subchapter that were un-\ndertaken during the previous fiscal\nyear. ...\nSEC. 504. DISCLOSURE TO MEMBERS\nOFCONGRESS OF CLASSIFIED DEFENSE\nINTELLIGENCE AGENCY REPORT RE -\nLATING TO MILITARY PERSONNEL LIST -\nED AS PRISONER , MISSING , OR UNAC -\nCOUNTED FOR .\nThe Secretary of Defense shall pro-\nvide to any Member of Congress,\nupon request, full and complete ac-\ncess to the classified report of the\nDefense Intelligence Agency com-\nmonly known as the Tighe Report,\nrelating to efforts by the Special Of-\nfice for Prisoners of War/Missing in\nAction of the Defense Intelligence\nAgency to fully account for United\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01580 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8961AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\nStates military personnel listed as\nprisoner, missing, or unaccounted for\nin military actions. ...\nMRS. [B ARBARA ] B OXER [of Cali-\nfornia]: Mr. Chairman, I offer an\namendment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mrs. Boxer:\nPage 25, after line 18, insert the fol-\nlowing new title:\nTITLE VIÐOVERSIGHT OF\nINTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES\nSEC. 601. CONGRESSIONAL OVER -\nSIGHT .\n(a) In General.ÐSection 501 of the\nNational Security Act of 1947 (50\nU.S.C. 413) is amended to read as\nfollows:\n``CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT\n``Sec. 501. (a) The President shall\nensure that the Select Committee on\nIntelligence of the Senate and the\nPermanent Select Committee on In-\ntelligence of the House of Represent-\natives (hereinafter in this title re-\nferred to as the ``intelligence commit-\ntees'') are kept fully and currently\ninformed of the intelligence activities\nof the United States including any\nsignificant anticipated intelligence\nactivities, as required by this title,\nexcept thatÐ\n``(1) nothing contained in this title\nshall be construed as requiring the\napproval of the intelligence commit-\ntees as a condition precedent to the\ninitiation of intelligence gathering\nactivities. ...\n``(b) The President, upon being\nmade aware of any allegations of il-\nlegal intelligence activity, shall im-\nmediately report such allegations to\nthe intelligence committees and keep\nthe intelligence committees informed\nof the ongoing investigations into\nsuch activities, such reports to en-\ncompass any measures taken to pre-vent a recurrence of such illegal ac-\ntivity, including the reporting of\nsuch activity to the Department of\nJustice for prosecution.\n``(c) The President and the intel-\nligence committees shall each estab-\nlish procedures as may be necessary\nto carry out the provisions of this\ntitle, including procedures to ensure\nthat each is kept fully and currently\ninformed of intelligence activities.\n``(d) The House of Representatives\nand the Senate, in consultation with\nthe Director of Central Intelligence,\nshall each establish, by rule or reso-\nlution of such House, procedures to\nensure that all members of the Con-\ngress are informed regarding intel-\nligence activities to the extent con-\nsistent with the need to protect from\nunauthorized disclosure classified in-\nformation and information relating\nto intelligence sources and methods\nfurnished to the intelligence commit-\ntees or to Members of Congress\nunder this title. In accordance with\nsuch procedures, each of the intel-\nligence committees shall promptly\ncall to the attention of its respective\nHouse, or to any appropriate com-\nmittee or committees of its respec-\ntive House, any matter relating to\nintelligence activities requiring the\nattention of such House or such com-\nmittee or committees.\n``(e) As used in this section, the\nterm ``intelligence activities'' includes\n`covert actions', as defined in section\n503(e).''\n(b) I NFORMATION REQUIRED TOBE\nDISCLOSED ; FINDINGS .ÐThe National\nSecurity Act of 1947 is amendedÐ\n(1) by redesignating sections 502\nand 503 as sections 505 and 506, re-\nspectively; and\n(2) by inserting after section 501\nthe following:\n``REPORTING INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES\n``Sec. 502. To the extent consistent\nwith due regard for the protection\nfrom unauthorized disclosure of clas-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01581 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8962DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\nsified information relating to sen-\nsitive intelligence sources and meth-\nods, the President shallÐ\n``(1) keep the intelligence commit-\ntees fully and currently informed of\nall intelligence activities which are\nthe responsibility of, are engaged in\nby, or are carried out for or on behalf\nof the United States Government, in-\ncluding any significant anticipated\nintelligence activity and significant\nfailures; and\n``(2) furnish the intelligence com-\nmittees any information or material\nconcerning intelligence activities\nwhich is within their custody or con-\ntrol and which is requested by either\nof the intelligence committees in\norder to carry out its authorized re-\nsponsibilities. ...\n``Sec. 503. (a) In setting forth the\nprocedures regulating covert actions,\nthis title shall not be construed as\nauthorizing the use of covert oper-\nations as a routine means of con-\nducting foreign policy or achieving\nforeign policy objectives.\n``(b) The President may not con-\nduct covert actions without prior ap-\nproval by the intelligence commit-\ntees, except as set forth in subsection\n(c)(6).\n``(c) Approval of a covert action by\nthe intelligence committees shall be\npredicated on the following: ...\n``(6) The approval by the intel-\nligence committees of each covert ac-\ntion must be obtained in writing be-\nfore the covert action can commence,\nexcept that the President may under\nextraordinary and emergency condi-\ntions, when time is of the essence,\ninitiate a covert action prior to re-\nceiving approval from the intel-\nligence committees, but such covert\naction shall cease within 48 hours of\ninitiation unless express written ap-\nproval of the covert action is given\nby the intelligence committees pur-\nsuant to such procedures as the in-\ntelligence committees may adopt to\nensure a prompt response in such\ncircumstances.``(d) The President shallÐ\n``(1) keep the intelligence commit-\ntees fully and currently informed of\nthe status of all covert actions which\nare carried out for or on behalf of the\nUnited States Government, including\nsignificant failures;\n``(2) furnish to the intelligence\ncommittees any information or mate-\nrial concerning covert actions which\nis in the possession, custody, or con-\ntrol of the executive branch and\nwhich is requested by either of the\nintelligence committees; . . .\n``Sec. 504. Any person who know-\ningly initiates or participates in a\ncovert action in violation of this title\nshall be guilty of a felony punishable\nby up to 20 years in Federal prison,\na fine of $100,000, or both.''. ..\nMR. [H ENRY J.] H YDE [of Illinois]:\nMr. Chairman, I make a point of order\nthat the amendment violates clause 7\nof rule XVI. . . . The proposed amend-\nment is not germane to the bill be-\ncause it deals with matters beyond the\nscope of the bill's provisions and the\namendment includes matters within\nthe jurisdiction of committees of the\nHouse not reporting the bill under con-\nsideration.\nMr. Chairman, the amendment is\nnot germane, and consequently violates\nclause 7 of rule XVI in the following\nspecific respects:\nFirst, the bill authorizes funds for a\nlimited number of executive depart-\nments or their subcomponents speci-\nfied in section 101 of the bill and\nmakes a few very modest changes in\nthe statutory authorities of only a few\nof those agencies.\nThe amendment would enact a com-\nprehensive scheme of oversight and re-\nporting requirements for all U.S. intel-\nligence activities which are engaged in\nby any U.S. Government agency, not\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01582 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8963AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\njust those covered by the bill, as well\nas by third parties outside of the U.S.\nGovernment. (Amndt: p. 4, lines 6±12.)\nIn this regard, I call attention to a\nruling by the Chair on September 27,\n1967 (113 Cong. Rec. page 26957) cited\nin section 798f of the Rules and Prac-\ntice of the House of Representatives.\nThat ruling states that, ``To a bill lim-\nited in its applicability to certain de-\npartments and agencies of government,\nan amendment applicable to all depart-\nments and agencies is not germane.''\nSecond, the only provision of the bill\naddressing congressional oversight of\nintelligence is section 503. That provi-\nsion is limited to oversight related only\nto one specific and narrow class of in-\ntelligence activities, and that is com-\nmercial cover activities to provide secu-\nrity only for intelligence collection.\nMoreover, section 503 of the bill ap-\nplies only to elements of one executive\ndepartment, the Defense Department,\nand the provision expires at the end of\n5 years.\nThe amendment goes far beyond that\none new and specifically limited over-\nsight subject in the bill. The amend-\nment provides for a comprehensive\noversight system for intelligence activi-\nties of the U.S. Government in general,\nand in some cases the role of outside\nthird parties. The amendment is also\nnot limited in duration, as is section\n503 of the bill, but is broader because\nit would enact a permanent statutory\nchange. In these regards, the amend-\nment is not germane because it is more\ngeneral in nature than the only provi-\nsion of the bill which deals with one\nparticular and narrow class within the\ngeneral subject of intelligence over-\nsight reporting.\nThe amendment further requires, as\npart of its oversight scheme, that theHouse and Senate establish certain\nprocedures by adopting internal rules\nor resolutions, matters not dealt with\nin any form by the bill. (Amndt: page\n3, lines 4±18.)\nThird, the amendment is not ger-\nmane because its text consists entirely\nof provisions repealing or amending\nsections of two statutes not amended\nor addressed by the bill under consid-\neration.\nThe amendment extensively amends\ntitle V of the National Security Act of\n1947, codified in title 50 of the United\nStates Code, and repeals section 662 of\nthe Foreign Assistance Act of 1961,\ncodified in title 22 of the United States\nCode. The bill does not amend either of\nthose statutes, and indeed, does not\namend any part of title 22 of the\nUnited States Code.\nSection 799 of the Rules and Practice\nof the House of Representatives cites a\nruling by the Chair on May 11, 1976,\nthat, ``Generally to a bill amending one\nexisting law, an amendment changing\nthe provisions of another law . .. is\nnot germane.'' Precedents cited in sec-\ntions 33.1 and 33.3 of chapter 28 of\nProcedures in the U.S. House of Rep-\nresentatives, 97th Congress, 4th Edi-\ntion (Deschler and Brown) support this\nprinciple with which the proposed\namendment is inconsistent.\nFurthermore, chapter 28, section\n33.14 of Deschler and Brown's Proce-\ndures in the U.S. House of Representa-\ntives, 97th Congress, 4th Edition cites\na precedent from a ruling of March 7,\n1974 (120 Cong Rec. 5653, 5654, 93rd\nCong. 2nd Sess.) that, ``An amendment\nrepealing existing law has been held\nnot germane to a bill not amending\nthat law.'' In proposing to repeal a sec-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01583 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8964DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n15.Bill Nelson (Fla.).tion of the Foreign Assistance Act of\n1961, a statute not amended by the\nbill, the proposed amendment is not\ngermane. (Amndt: page 1, lines 3±4.)\nFourth, the amendment is not ger-\nmane because it fails the test of com-\nmittee jurisdiction under section 798c\nof the Rules and Practice of the House\nof Representatives by including mat-\nters within the jurisdiction of commit-\ntees not reporting the bill, the Com-\nmittee on Foreign Affairs and Rules.\nThe amendment would repeal sec-\ntion 662 of the Foreign Assistance Act\nof 1961. That act is within the jurisdic-\ntion of the Foreign Affairs Committee.\n(Amndt: page 1, lines 3±4.)\nThe amendment also would require\nthe House (and one of its committees)\nto establish certain internal procedures\nby the adoption of House rules or reso-\nlutions. Such matters are within the\njurisdiction of the Committee on Rules.\n(Amndt: p. 3, lines 4±18.)\nFifth, the amendment (at p. 8, lines\n8±12) would create a penal offense,\nwhereas the pending bill does not deal\nwith or create any criminal offenses. In\naddition, the committees reporting the\nbill do not have jurisdiction to consider\nsuch matters. In that regard, I would\ncall the attention of the Chair to a\nprecedent of the House, rulings by the\nChairman of the Committee of the\nWhole, Mr. Forand on April 7, 1960. In\nthose rulings, the Chair sustained\npoints of order against two amend-\nments to a pending amendment in the\nnature of a substitute to a bill relating\nto employment of retired officers by\nDefense contractors reported from the\nArmed Services Committee. Those\npoints of order were sustained by the\nChair, which ruled that the substitutesdealt with the imposition of criminal\npenalties, a matter not dealt with in\nthe proposition being amended. Fur-\nther, the Chair ruled that the sub-\nstitutes' imposition of criminal pen-\nalties was a matter outside the juris-\ndiction of the committee which had re-\nported the pending bill [Armed Serv-\nices] and, if offered as a separate bill,\nwould have to be referred to the Com-\nmittee on the Judiciary.\nFor all the reasons given and in light\nof the precedents cited, the amendment\nis not germane, and therefore it vio-\nlates clause 7 of rule XVI. I insist upon\nmy point of order, Mr. Chairman. . . .\nMRS. BOXER : . . . We feel it is abso-\nlutely germane. We feel that there are\nother provisions in the bill, for example\non page 26 and page 33 that talk about\npermanent changes in law, and we\nwould say that this is absolutely ger-\nmane.\nMy goodness, we are talking about\ncovert activities, and certainly the In-\ntelligence Committee, and it is hard for\nme to believe that someone could say\nthat a discussion of covert activities in\nthis particular amendment would not\nbe germane to the intelligence author-\nization bill. . . .\nMR. [A NTHONY C.] B EILENSON [of\nCalifornia]: . . . I recognize the right of\nthe gentleman, of course, to make this\npoint of order and, in fact, I do not\nknow how the Chair will rule on the\nprecedents which the gentleman from\nIllinois has cited. I would only ask that\nin its ruling the Chair consider the fact\nthat there are already provisions in the\nbill which do broaden its scope. . . .\nTHECHAIRMAN :(15). . . The Chair is\nprepared to rule.\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01584 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8965AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\nThe gentleman from Illinois (Mr.\nHyde) makes the point of order that\nthe amendment offered by the gentle-\nwoman from California is not germane\nto the bill. The amendment adds a new\ntitle and must be germane to the bill\nas a whole, as amended.\nThe bill authorizes funding for the\nintelligence community for 1 fiscal year\nand makes several, diverse changes in\npermanent law relating to sundry au-\nthorities of the Central Intelligence\nAgency and the Department of De-\nfense. For example, the bill makes\nchanges in the CIA retirement and dis-\nability system; it authorizes the Sec-\nretary of Defense to permit compo-\nnents of DOD to charge the CIA the\nsame rate for airlift services that they\nwould charge another component of\nDOD; and it authorizes the Secretary\nof Defense to withhold certain geodetic\nproducts from disclosure under the\nFreedom of Information Act. In addi-\ntion, the bill, as perfected, includes the\namendment recommended by the Com-\nmittee on Armed Services directing the\nSecretary of Defense to provide Mem-\nbers of Congress access to a classified\nreport of the Defense Intelligence\nAgency assessing efforts to account for\nmilitary personnel listed as prisoners\nof war or missing in action.\nThe amendment at the desk does not\nrepeal the Hughes-Ryan law, but does\namend title V of the National Security\nAct of 1947Ðrelating to accountability\nfor intelligence activities. Among other\nthings, it assigns to the President sev-\neral responsibilities of the type that\nthe existing act assigns to lower offi-\ncials, such as the Director of Central\nIntelligence.\nAlthough the bill does not amend the\nNational Security Act of 1947, neitherdoes it confine itself to authorities and\nactivities of the intelligence commu-\nnity. In addition to the changes in per-\nmanent law already noted, at section\n503 the bill inserts new provisions in\ntitle 10 of the United States CodeÐre-\nlating to the Armed ForcesÐto ensure\ncongressional oversight of activities of\nthe Department of Defense in commer-\ncial cover of intelligence operations.\nThus, the subject matter of the\namendmentÐthe relationship between\nthe executive branch and the Congress\nwith respect to the authorities and ac-\ntivities of the intelligence communityÐ\nis one of the diverse topics already ad-\ndressed in the bill.\nAccordingly, the point of order is\noverruled.\nMR. HYDE: Mr. Chairman, may I ask\none question?\nMr. Chairman, I did not hear that\npart, what the Chair read about the\ncriminal penalties that she inserts in\nthe law, and my point that that should\ngo to the Committee on the Judiciary,\nthat it is certainly beyond the scope of\nour bill.\nI must have missed that. How did\nthe Chair rule on that, sir?\nTHECHAIRMAN : The Chair thinks\nthat the bill, as presented and amend-\ned contains provisions within several\ncommittee jurisdictions. Therefore the\namendment need not meet a strict ju-\nrisdictional test. Accordingly, the Chair\nrules that the point of order is over-\nruled.\nParliamentarian's Note: Mr.\nHyde's point of order anticipated\ninclusion in the Boxer amendment\nof a provision repealing the so-\ncalled ``Hughes-Ryan'' amendment\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01585 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8966DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n16.84 C ONG. REC. 8715, 76th Cong. 1st\nSess. Under consideration was H.R.\n6634 (Committee on Flood Control).to the Foreign Assistance Act (22\nU.S.C. 2422), a law not amended\nby the bill and within the partial\njurisdiction of another committee\n(Foreign Affairs). The offered\namendment did not include that\nproposed repeal but did include\nthe criminal provision cited in the\npoint of order. As indicated in the\nChair's follow-up response, it was\nonly because of the diverse nature\nof the bill that the criminal provi-\nsion was held germane. (Compare\nApr. 7, 1960, rulings in sections\n4.39 and 4.40, supra, cited by Mr.\nHyde.) In those cases the points of\norder were sustained that the\ncriminal sanction provisions con-\ntained in the amendments at-\ntempted to attain a result by a\nmethod unrelated to the narrow\npurpose of the bill. The pending\nproposition in those cases was not\ndiverse and therefore not suscep-\ntible to the amendments ruled\nout.\nBill Amending 1937 Flood Con-\ntrol ActÐAmendment To\nAmend 1936 Act\n§35.103 To a bill proposing to\namend the Flood Control Act\nof 1937, an amendment pro-\nposing to amend the Flood\nControl Act of 1936 was held\nto be not germane, the act of\n1936 having been enacted for\npurposes not related to the\nbill.The ruling described above was\nmade on July 6, 1939.(16)Pro-\nceedings were as follows:\nThe Clerk called the bill (H.R. 6634)\namending previous flood-control acts\nand authorizing certain preliminary\nexaminations and surveys for flood\ncontrol, and for other purposes.\nThere being no objection, the Clerk\nread the bill as follows:\nBe it enacted, etc., That section 2\nof the Flood Control Act of August\n28, 1937, is hereby amended to read\nas follows:\n``That the Secretary of War is\nhereby authorized to allot not to ex-\nceed $300,000 from any appropria-\ntions heretofore or hereafter made\nfor any one fiscal year for flood con-\ntrol, for removing accumulated snags\nand other debris and clearing chan-\nnels in navigable streams and tribu-\ntaries thereof when in the opinion of\nthe Chief of Engineers such work is\nadvisable in the interest of flood con-\ntrol: Provided , That not more than\n$25,000 shall be allotted for this pur-\npose for any single tributary from\nthe appropriations for any one fiscal\nyear.''\nSec. 2. Funds heretofore or here-\nafter appropriated for construction\nand maintenance of flood-control\nworks by the War Department shall\nbe available for expenditure by the\nWar Department in making exami-\nnations and surveys for flood control\nheretofore or hereafter authorized, or\nin preparing reports in review there-\nof as authorized by law, in addition\nto funds heretofore authorized to be\nexpended for such purposes by the\nWar Department.\nSec. 3. That section 2 of the River\nand Harbor Act of June 20, 1938, is\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01586 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8967AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\nhereby made applicable to author-\nized works of flood control. ...\nMR. [L OUIS L.] L UDLOW [of Indiana]:\nMr. Speaker, I offer an amendment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Lud-\nlow: On page 2, after the word ``de-\npartment'' in line 12, insert a new\nsection, as follows:\n``Sec. 3. Section 3 of the act enti-\ntled `An act authorizing the construc-\ntion of certain public works on rivers\nand harbors for flood control, and for\nother purposes', approved June 22,\n1936, as amended, is amended by\nadding before the period at the end\nthereof a colon and the following:\n`And provided further, That if, after\ninvestigation, the President finds\nthat any city or town is, by reason of\nits financial condition, unable to\ncomply with the requirements of this\nsection as to local cooperation, he is\nhereby authorized to waive such re-\nquirements on any individual levee\nor flood-wall project not to exceed 50\npercent of the estimated costs of the\nlands, easements, and rights-of-\nway.' ''\n``The first paragraph of section 2 of\nthe act entitled `An act authorizing\nthe construction of certain public\nworks on rivers and harbors for flood\ncontrol, and for other purposes, ap-\nproved June 28, 1938, is amended to\nread as follows:\n```That section 3 of the act of June\n22, 1936 (Public, No. 738, 74th\nCong.), as heretofore amended, as\nherein further modified, and as\namended after June 28, 1938, shall\napply to all flood-control projects, ex-\ncept as otherwise specifically pro-\nvided by law.' ''\nMR. [W ILLIAM M.] W HITTINGTON [of\nMississippi]: Mr. Speaker, I make the\npoint of order that, as I said, this\namendment is not germane to the bill.\nThe bill undertakes to amend the\nFlood Control Act of 1937 and theFlood Control Act of 1938. They are\nperfecting amendments. The gentle-\nman's amendment is an amendment to\nthe act of 1936, that is in no way in-\nvolved in this bill, as it relates to local\ncontributions for levees and flood\nwalls.\nSo I make the point of order that the\namendment is not germane to the bill\nunder consideration or any section\nthereof.\nTHESPEAKER PROTEMPORE [Sam\nRayburn, of Texas]: The Chair is ready\nto rule.\nMR. [C ASSIUS C.] D OWELL [of Iowa]:\nMr. Speaker, the amendment sub-\nmitted by the gentleman from Indiana\nmerely asks to relieve the city from the\npayment of what is due under the law\nand is in no way germane to the ques-\ntion before the House.\nTHESPEAKER PROTEMPORE : The\nChair is ready to rule.\nThe bill before the House is a bill to\namend the Flood Control Act of 1937.\nThat act had one purpose. The Flood\nControl Act of 1936 had another pur-\npose. The gentleman from Indiana (Mr.\nLudlow) offers an amendment as an\namendment to the Flood Control Act of\n1936. The amendment clearly is not\ngermane to this bill, and the Chair\nsustains the point of order.\nEndangered Species ActÐ\nAmendment Giving Respon-\nsibilities to Parties Not With-\nin Coverage of Bill\n§35.104 To a bill amending the\nEndangered Species Act, an\namendment providing that a\nCorps of Engineers permit\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01587 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8968DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n17.124 C ONG. R EC. 38134, 38140,\n38141, 95th Cong. 2d Sess.for a power project, and\nRural Electrification loan\nguarantee commitments and\napprovals be deemed to sat-\nisfy the requirements of the\nEndangered Species Act and\nof other environmental acts,\nand directing the Corps and\nthe Administration, after the\nrendering of an opinion by\nthe Fish and Wildlife Service\nand in consultation with the\nSecretary of the Interior, to\nrequire modifications in the\nproject to protect endan-\ngered species and their habi-\ntats, and a similar amend-\nment only omitting the ref-\nerences to other environ-\nmental acts, were held not\ngermane since broadening\nthe responsibilities and au-\nthorities of agencies not cov-\nered by the bill.\nDuring consideration of H.R.\n14014 in the Committee of the\nWhole on Oct. 14, 1978,(17)the\nChair sustained a point of order\nin the circumstances described\nabove. The proceedings were as\nfollows:\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nBe it enacted by the Senate and\nHouse of Representatives of the\nUnited States of America in Congress\nassembled, That this Act may becited as the ``Endangered Species Act\nAmendments of 1978''.\nSec. 2. Section 4 of the Endan-\ngered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C.\n1533) is amendedÐ\n(1) by adding at the end of sub-\nsection (a)(1) the following new sen-\ntence: ``At the time any such regula-\ntion is proposed, the Secretary shall\nalso by regulation, to the maximum\nextent prudent, specify any habitat\nof such species which is then consid-\nered to be critical habitat. The re-\nquirement of the preceding sentence\nshall not apply with respect to any\nspecies which was listed prior to en-\nactment of the Endangered Species\nAct Amendments of 1978.''. ..\nMR. [T ENO] RONCALIO [of Wyoming]:\nMr. Chairman, I offer an amendment.\nThe Clerk read as follows:\nAmendment offered by Mr. Ron-\ncalio: On page 32, after line 21, add\nnew section (No. 12) as follows:\n``The Department of the Army Per-\nmit to Basin Electric Power Coopera-\ntive for the Missouri Basin Power\nProject, issued on March 23, 1978, as\namended October 10, 1978, is hereby\nratified and shall be deemed to sat-\nisfy the requirements of the Endan-\ngered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et\nseq.) as amended, and the Rural\nElectrification Administration loan\nguarantee commitments and approv-\nals associated therewith relating to\nthe Missouri Basin Power Project are\ndeemed to satisfy the requirements\nof the Endangered Species Act; Pro-\nvided, That following the rendering\nof a biological opinion by the United\nStates Fish and Wildlife Service con-\ncerning the effect, if any, of the oper-\nation of the Missouri Basin Power\nProject on endangered species or\ntheir critical habitat, the responsible\nofficers of the Rural Electrification\nAdministration and of the Army\nCorps of Engineers shall require\nsuch modifications in the operation\nof the Project as they and the Sec-\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01588 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8969AMENDMENTS AND THE GERMANENESS RULE Ch. 28 §35\n18.See § 42.32, infra. 19.B. F. Sisk (Calif.).retary of Interior may determine are\nrequired to insure that actions au-\nthorized, funded, or carried out by\nthem, relating to the Missouri Basin\nPower Project do not jeopardize the\ncontinued existence of such endan-\ngered species and threatened species\nor result in the destruction or modi-\nfication of habitat of such species\nwhich is or has been determined to\nbe critical, by the Secretary of the\nInterior, after consultation as appro-\npriate with the affected States.''. ..\nMR. RONCALIO : Mr. Chairman, I can-\nnot imagine how a point of order could\nbe reserved on the amendment at this\npoint.\nThe precise objections to the last\namendment(18)were stricken from this\namendment, and this amendment is\nleft with a citation of only one statute,\nand that is the Endangered Species\nAct, which is precisely the statute be-\nfore us at this time. I cannot imagine\nan attack on the germaneness provi-\nsion at this point.\nI have stricken from my first amend-\nment all reference to the Army Corps\nof Engineers, all reference to the Na-\ntional Environmental Policy Act of\n1969, and all reference to the Federal\nWater Pollution Control Act. There is\nonly one act cited in the amendment,\nand that is precisely the one before\nus....\nMR. [J OHN J.] C AVANAUGH [of Ne-\nbraska]: Mr. Chairman, I make a point\nof order against the amendment on the\nbasis that the amendment is not ger-\nmane to the bill. The differences be-\ntween this amendment and the amend-\nment previously offered are that the\ngentleman from Wyoming has stricken\nspecific references in the first portionof his amendment to the National En-\nvironmental Policy Act, the Federal\nWater Pollution Control Act, and the\nRural Electrification Act, but the gen-\ntleman's amendment has not stricken\nnew responsibilities imposed upon the\nRural Electrification Administration,\nthe Army Corps of Engineers, the Fish\nand Wildlife Service, and the Secretary\nof the Interior.\nThe amendment would continue to\nrequire biological opinion by the Fish\nand Wildlife Service, and require addi-\ntional duties of responsible officers of\nthe REA, the Corps of Engineers; to re-\nquire modifications of the project.\nIn addition, it requires the Secretary\nof the Interior to consult with the ap-\npropriate affected states, which would\nalso be a new obligation not envisioned\nin the act imposed upon agencies of\nGovernment. In addition to that, the\namendment is not germane to the sec-\ntion. It appears as a new section fol-\nlowing section 32, a section dealing\nwith certain antique articles.\nSo, I would renew my point of order\nas to germaneness both to the bill and\nto the section.\nTHECHAIRMAN :(19)The Chair is pre-\npared to rule.\nActually, the amendment adds a new\nsection, let the Chair say to the gen-\ntleman from Nebraska, which in the\nopinion of the Chair would need only\nbe germane to the bill as a whole.\nHowever, the earlier matter cited by\nthe gentleman from Nebraska in his\npoint of order dealing with the ex-\npanded authority and responsibilities\nand obligations of the Rural Elec-\ntrification Administration and Army\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01589 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02 8970DESCHLER -BROWN PRECEDENTS Ch. 28 §35\n20.See § 36.2, infra.\n1.See § 42.43, infra.\n2.Id.\n3.See § 36.3, infra.\n4.See 5 Hinds' Precedents § 5824.5.See § 41.6, infra.\n6.H.J. Res. 236 (Committee on the Dis-\ntrict of Columbia).\n7.91 C ONG. REC. 9911, 79th Cong. 1st\nSess., Oct. 22, 1945.Corps of Engineers is still a part of the\namendment as the Chair views it.\nTherefore, the Chair would have to\nsustain the point of order on the basis\nthat it would still expand authorities\nwhich are not within the coverage of\nthe bill.\n§36. Amendment Repeal-\ning Existing Law to Bill\nAmending That Law\nTo a bill amending existing law\nin one particular,(20)or in a lim-\nited respect,(1)an amendment re-\npealing the law is not germane.\nThus, to a bill establishing a new\noffice within a government depart-\nment, an amendment to abolish\nthe department is not germane.(2)\nSimilarly, to an amendment pro-\nposing to amend existing law in\nsome particulars, an amendment\nproposing to repeal the law in its\nentirety is not germane,(3)unless\nthe proposition being amended\nchanges law in a comprehensive\nand diverse way, in which case an\namendment proposing repeal of\nthe law may be germane.(4)And to\na bill referring to certain provi-\nsions of existing law, an amend-\nment repealing a portion of thatlaw has been held not to be ger-\nmane.(5)\nContinuing Tax Exemptions\nfor Property Used by Govern-\nmentÐAmendment Repealing\nOther Exemptions\n§36.1 To a bill to continue the\ntax-exempt status of certain\nproperty owned by others\nbut used and occupied by\ngovernment agencies or by\nthe Red Cross, an amend-\nment seeking to repeal the\nlaw granting tax exemptions\nwith respect to property oc-\ncupied by the Daughters of\nthe American Revolution was\nheld not to be germane.\nIn the 79th Congress, a bill(6)\nwas under consideration which\nstated in part as follows:(7)\nWhereas in times of national stress\nit is necessary for the United States of\nAmerica and its various instrumental-\nities to use and occupy additional\nspace necessary for the proper execu-\ntion of their enlarged functions: There-\nfore be it\nResolved, etc., That the use and occu-\npancy of real property in the District of\nColumbia by any department, agency,\nor instrumentality of the United States\nof America, or by the American Red\nVerDate 18-JUN-99 14:36 Sep 22, 1999 Jkt 010199 PO 00000 Frm 01590 Fmt 8875 Sfmt 8875 E:\\RENEE\\52093C28.TXT txed02 PsN: txed02"
} |
[
-0.050936199724674225,
0.03511984646320343,
0.02759283222258091,
-0.005127032287418842,
-0.050853319466114044,
0.08792433142662048,
-0.02383866347372532,
0.014786511659622192,
-0.10421591997146606,
0.019590795040130615,
0.1076306700706482,
-0.01889856532216072,
-0.0027007765602320433,
0.014653039164841175,
0.012120207771658897,
-0.031900666654109955,
0.06764604151248932,
-0.0055824583396315575,
-0.031067777425050735,
-0.014529391191899776,
0.041449882090091705,
0.006427052430808544,
-0.046051088720560074,
0.009089193306863308,
-0.0514020100235939,
0.029992667958140373,
-0.026786431670188904,
-0.04321575164794922,
-0.04160504788160324,
0.015180343762040138,
0.0408206470310688,
-0.015440876595675945,
0.006051847245544195,
-0.005853316746652126,
0.08988629281520844,
-0.028361359611153603,
0.14135439693927765,
-0.038691453635692596,
-0.007211899850517511,
-0.012961991131305695,
-0.015398954972624779,
-0.1080021783709526,
-0.05374952033162117,
-0.0007509816787205637,
-0.027043918147683144,
-0.016426067799329758,
-0.0737047791481018,
-0.049089014530181885,
0.021501336246728897,
0.0015789999160915613,
-0.010309316217899323,
0.027799280360341072,
0.0421605110168457,
0.004478210583329201,
-0.0026936570648103952,
-0.10523953288793564,
-0.03824301064014435,
-0.0077154249884188175,
-0.04018194228410721,
0.08875379711389542,
-0.08684006333351135,
-0.03366131708025932,
-0.008771570399403572,
0.002091972855851054,
0.0186677984893322,
-0.011769106611609459,
-0.022843778133392334,
-0.10476552695035934,
0.03942488133907318,
-0.044457271695137024,
-0.041912440210580826,
-0.06685849279165268,
0.0169614776968956,
-0.03506024181842804,
0.020078575238585472,
0.018199799582362175,
0.012483864091336727,
0.08585222065448761,
0.03356730937957764,
-0.17622904479503632,
-0.028592117130756378,
-0.05829380080103874,
-0.0026215044781565666,
0.0001225425658049062,
-0.015822267159819603,
-0.010778054594993591,
-0.05662120133638382,
-0.06753985583782196,
0.07868864387273788,
0.0526387058198452,
0.1402304619550705,
-0.02378600649535656,
0.024277549237012863,
-0.00026657237322069705,
0.07305895537137985,
-0.0951378270983696,
-0.10050185769796371,
-0.08671697229146957,
0.041812967509031296,
0.010934431105852127,
-0.03720250353217125,
0.016670789569616318,
-0.05512604862451553,
0.01719673164188862,
-0.06697587668895721,
-0.08713152259588242,
-0.03229742497205734,
-0.0016491312999278307,
-0.047458600252866745,
0.04784443974494934,
-0.026727335527539253,
0.014162914827466011,
0.03229447081685066,
-0.01673508621752262,
-0.09775915741920471,
-0.011086552403867245,
0.05836621671915054,
-0.06589624285697937,
0.0880516842007637,
-0.049765512347221375,
0.07220254093408585,
0.043629731982946396,
-0.020719662308692932,
-0.02300538308918476,
-0.02559863030910492,
-0.014997974969446659,
0.011080102995038033,
-1.8990099482590546e-32,
-0.07069510966539383,
-0.01888854429125786,
0.03534133359789848,
0.003641637274995446,
-0.01369479950517416,
-0.07144687324762344,
0.0351751409471035,
-0.01963205076754093,
0.010327142663300037,
-0.04678024724125862,
-0.009412117302417755,
-0.04130179062485695,
0.027225691825151443,
-0.018236039206385612,
-0.004585674963891506,
-0.0035497413482517004,
-0.048856742680072784,
0.06263934075832367,
0.025584394112229347,
0.051641806960105896,
-0.04121594503521919,
0.01013399288058281,
0.05393771827220917,
0.048877403140068054,
0.010052939876914024,
0.11798649281263351,
-0.08582393079996109,
0.0381828211247921,
-0.007672314997762442,
0.007190084084868431,
0.0879267007112503,
0.05191764980554581,
-0.022325320169329643,
-0.024945518001914024,
-0.013398269191384315,
0.012916787527501583,
0.04919523745775223,
-0.0790892094373703,
-0.02923518419265747,
-0.013937467709183693,
-0.009146650321781635,
0.038183022290468216,
0.11345373839139938,
0.04907897859811783,
0.009656625799834728,
0.014234662987291813,
-0.054511889815330505,
0.0277722030878067,
0.13235528767108917,
0.036676470190286636,
0.018224013969302177,
-0.03201017156243324,
-0.07369217276573181,
-0.10838368535041809,
-0.08521860837936401,
-0.054246462881565094,
-0.030410371720790863,
0.022697104141116142,
0.029617367312312126,
-0.05345628038048744,
0.009368008933961391,
0.010257403366267681,
-0.04473422095179558,
-0.06828472763299942,
-0.04646047204732895,
0.014603954739868641,
-0.04127687215805054,
-0.01704779826104641,
-0.038386087864637375,
-0.009691378101706505,
0.016323043033480644,
-0.03248734399676323,
0.00851336121559143,
-0.06663615256547928,
0.023703627288341522,
-0.040836311876773834,
0.04133078083395958,
0.006353701464831829,
0.04619068279862404,
-0.01618664152920246,
-0.021220112219452858,
-0.04265601560473442,
0.043476030230522156,
-0.06137508153915405,
0.00033081870060414076,
0.016602765768766403,
-0.002656354336068034,
0.02877807430922985,
0.015056730248034,
0.008972151204943657,
-0.06686026602983475,
-0.03829270601272583,
-0.03613556548953056,
0.07592500001192093,
0.056802570819854736,
7.37069194238542e-33,
-0.018702667206525803,
0.045997634530067444,
-0.043950751423835754,
0.023930668830871582,
0.01930691860616207,
-0.018025919795036316,
-0.026506366208195686,
-0.028734084218740463,
-0.00879644975066185,
-0.02466745488345623,
0.0321793258190155,
-0.03382457047700882,
0.030134784057736397,
0.024386035278439522,
-0.07821454852819443,
0.07081934809684753,
0.04881751164793968,
0.043674614280462265,
-0.04228849709033966,
-0.020955288782715797,
-0.053418368101119995,
0.014254928566515446,
0.061520159244537354,
0.15093852579593658,
-0.041888996958732605,
0.00940774567425251,
-0.006849047262221575,
-0.040448304265737534,
-0.013762910850346088,
-0.05555995926260948,
-0.008466976694762707,
-0.03523515537381172,
-0.013897432945668697,
0.1015738993883133,
-0.061477180570364,
-0.11381714046001434,
0.013023924082517624,
-0.010018951259553432,
-0.004385432228446007,
-0.03450014814734459,
0.05185744911432266,
-0.01576467975974083,
-0.021001257002353668,
0.13257622718811035,
-0.03998883068561554,
-0.0043878499418497086,
0.1079898327589035,
-0.020236948505043983,
-0.009499503299593925,
0.014538595452904701,
-0.04601695016026497,
0.003929091151803732,
-0.014630056917667389,
-0.041002631187438965,
-0.042167872190475464,
0.08340063691139221,
0.035726163536310196,
-0.07001790404319763,
-0.047139327973127365,
-0.055742546916007996,
0.04148351773619652,
0.016493912786245346,
-0.07460713386535645,
-0.0005706551601178944,
0.12080561369657516,
-0.050427310168743134,
-0.028869399800896645,
-0.0467056967318058,
0.0022307806648314,
-0.03830110654234886,
-0.0012424009619280696,
-0.060965318232774734,
0.019775206223130226,
-0.049079734832048416,
-0.023928167298436165,
0.02111945115029812,
0.007877202704548836,
0.006868482567369938,
-0.11694729328155518,
0.0057925935834646225,
-0.059863679111003876,
-0.019978290423750877,
-0.08640620857477188,
0.0013459123438224196,
0.030124951153993607,
-0.010949922725558281,
0.07180793583393097,
-0.04771708324551582,
-0.005191534757614136,
0.1091216430068016,
-0.06545445322990417,
0.024560976773500443,
0.05453016236424446,
0.05094580724835396,
0.02640676125884056,
-3.909712376071184e-8,
0.15022043883800507,
0.03615722805261612,
-0.03754108399152756,
0.040588103234767914,
0.02118849568068981,
-0.02247363142669201,
-0.09438193589448929,
0.0022698654793202877,
-0.03288396820425987,
0.06872689723968506,
-0.010861788876354694,
0.10726222395896912,
-0.006769184488803148,
-0.027035709470510483,
-0.03390278294682503,
-0.09288707375526428,
-0.0355057567358017,
0.014857657253742218,
-0.06881210207939148,
0.03745062276721001,
-0.04316196218132973,
-0.051560353487730026,
-0.04281451180577278,
-0.008490251377224922,
-0.016237592324614525,
0.02141786552965641,
-0.04488658905029297,
0.06919734179973602,
0.024843579158186913,
-0.012825570069253445,
-0.007916645146906376,
0.014156036078929901,
0.033734411001205444,
-0.08185388147830963,
-0.04077254608273506,
-0.01155257411301136,
0.010033436119556427,
0.05770355090498924,
-0.0010673212818801403,
0.02861291915178299,
-0.00329391285777092,
-0.023195607587695122,
-0.013576827943325043,
0.05683832988142967,
0.004279560409486294,
0.09520808607339859,
-0.24692925810813904,
-0.009951041080057621,
0.012590434402227402,
0.014111815020442009,
0.006509436760097742,
0.017498476430773735,
-0.023525727912783623,
0.009703995659947395,
0.033153824508190155,
-0.014240657910704613,
-0.03697407618165016,
-0.033877018839120865,
0.07801886647939682,
-0.02883663959801197,
0.05112406238913536,
-0.053351398557424545,
-0.023372897878289223,
0.06444553285837173
] | {
"pdf_file": "ZBOY7WHWU4JUMTIM2RO2TCO5VONTYYE4.pdf",
"text": "1C O N T E N T S\nPage\nFood Stamp Act of 1977 .......................................................... 1–1\nChild Nutrition Act of 1966 .................................................... 2–1National School Lunch Act ..................................................... 3–1Emergency Food Assistance Act of 1983 ............................... 4–1Agriculture and Consumer Protection Act of 1973, Secs.\n4 & 5 ......................................................................................... 5–1\nAgriculture and Food Act of 1981, Sec. 1114 ........................ 6–1Commodity Distribution Reform Act and WIC Amend-\nments of 1987 ........................................................................... 7–1\nPersonal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconcili-\nation Act of 1996, Title IV & Secs. 741 & 742 ...................... 8–1\nFarm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002, Subtitle\nD—Miscellaneous of Title IV .................................................. 9–1Q:\\COMP\\FNS\\FNS.TOC\nFebruary 20, 2003 "
} |
[
-0.039486855268478394,
0.048089005053043365,
0.040447019040584564,
-0.031498029828071594,
0.015370390377938747,
0.049929991364479065,
0.011021748185157776,
0.034289419651031494,
0.058371223509311676,
0.0359635204076767,
0.053310588002204895,
0.0776795744895935,
-0.01373644545674324,
-0.053752604871988297,
-0.07789502292871475,
0.03312693163752556,
0.10618245601654053,
0.05373610183596611,
-0.017174609005451202,
0.06848949193954468,
0.03186509385704994,
0.003392026061192155,
-0.003034973284229636,
0.014344762079417706,
-0.05579809099435806,
-0.02482907474040985,
-0.051785435527563095,
0.026236774399876595,
0.02513965032994747,
-0.055709682404994965,
-0.009676576592028141,
0.04485262930393219,
-0.03226771950721741,
0.010374614968895912,
-0.01766628958284855,
-0.027445035055279732,
0.0316578671336174,
-0.023024706169962883,
0.0002687002706807107,
0.0005062678828835487,
0.022891130298376083,
0.016321931034326553,
-0.03796815499663353,
-0.0013457635650411248,
0.08009371906518936,
0.05340695381164551,
0.06244026869535446,
0.001742994412779808,
-0.10243524610996246,
0.00949550699442625,
0.0033207875676453114,
-0.03742524981498718,
-0.059955768287181854,
0.058332815766334534,
-0.03200893849134445,
0.048595916479825974,
0.01830292120575905,
0.1003718376159668,
0.03232255205512047,
0.03785011172294617,
-0.006366086658090353,
-0.031241370365023613,
-0.0503767654299736,
0.030720848590135574,
0.03258591890335083,
-0.055478401482105255,
0.04487190395593643,
-0.10788844525814056,
0.009353900328278542,
0.06010621786117554,
0.09643151611089706,
0.021895993500947952,
0.08677675575017929,
0.02690606750547886,
-0.03239474073052406,
-0.006833218969404697,
0.0333901047706604,
0.03659772500395775,
0.04227334260940552,
-0.0753958448767662,
0.013144334778189659,
-0.010668564587831497,
-0.018916046246886253,
-0.08458859473466873,
0.032082561403512955,
-0.10021580010652542,
-0.00919062178581953,
0.04581083357334137,
0.16023752093315125,
-0.008810597471892834,
0.029494015499949455,
-0.07389853149652481,
0.02067088894546032,
-0.0756387710571289,
0.03082827851176262,
-0.0038190986961126328,
-0.030712412670254707,
0.009682878851890564,
0.08075220137834549,
0.07366792857646942,
0.046611517667770386,
0.06200370565056801,
-0.10152005404233932,
0.010790964588522911,
0.033084090799093246,
0.0023719060700386763,
-0.01996002346277237,
0.050450585782527924,
-0.08904682099819183,
0.014022188261151314,
-0.01014261320233345,
0.007342819590121508,
0.09285638481378555,
-0.06517627835273743,
0.003439773805439472,
0.04279487580060959,
-0.04683912917971611,
0.063721664249897,
0.051555559039115906,
-0.11670922487974167,
-0.020831026136875153,
-0.001490171765908599,
-0.058112919330596924,
-0.028980977833271027,
0.010363548062741756,
-0.023232197389006615,
0.046251773834228516,
3.237983677996456e-33,
-0.001709094038233161,
-0.04599117115139961,
-0.02690344676375389,
-0.13727420568466187,
0.04320691525936127,
-0.024006037041544914,
-0.03203889727592468,
-0.030871065333485603,
0.050142012536525726,
-0.05602191761136055,
0.05849453806877136,
-0.09610302746295929,
0.05107730254530907,
-0.10208018869161606,
-0.04725104942917824,
-0.02998921275138855,
-0.02610926516354084,
0.06240023300051689,
-0.06717485189437866,
0.01726340688765049,
0.02253088355064392,
-0.0655294731259346,
-0.05666209012269974,
0.014406941831111908,
-0.11080583184957504,
-0.0223249439150095,
-0.013162117451429367,
0.01641267165541649,
-0.06879640370607376,
-0.01091588381677866,
0.047113195061683655,
0.05546663701534271,
0.02401934191584587,
0.09738941490650177,
0.019960448145866394,
-0.010269333608448505,
-0.023960158228874207,
-0.036176227033138275,
0.046004582196474075,
-0.005034520756453276,
-0.03501566872000694,
0.08017264306545258,
-0.07461468875408173,
-0.007893341593444347,
-0.021787771955132484,
-0.10818501561880112,
0.008821884170174599,
0.029206540435552597,
-0.03335548937320709,
0.03006630577147007,
0.0743846744298935,
0.03140842169523239,
0.10706981271505356,
-0.026232773438096046,
-0.06003594398498535,
0.025068961083889008,
-0.0052436767145991325,
0.008984752930700779,
-0.06015915423631668,
0.05248848721385002,
0.05099967122077942,
0.05998269096016884,
-0.009357350878417492,
-0.03588096424937248,
-0.0654831975698471,
0.024736011400818825,
-0.0705561712384224,
0.03680994361639023,
-0.004994540009647608,
-0.050400085747241974,
-0.013438447378575802,
0.04012821614742279,
-0.020231083035469055,
-0.028306113556027412,
0.017538469284772873,
-0.053032100200653076,
0.046977248042821884,
0.01770024560391903,
0.02828376367688179,
-0.0892978310585022,
-0.0623486153781414,
-0.025962991639971733,
-0.04390320926904678,
0.03251636028289795,
0.005607352126389742,
-0.06442573666572571,
-0.024243498221039772,
0.011126825585961342,
-0.039361484348773956,
-0.030499504879117012,
0.025433529168367386,
-0.005605179350823164,
0.046178512275218964,
0.08820874989032745,
0.05168675631284714,
-3.462418610347048e-33,
-0.03353901207447052,
-0.053308721631765366,
-0.013884824700653553,
0.06262752413749695,
-0.046995386481285095,
-0.014347122982144356,
-0.029576454311609268,
-0.0522620752453804,
-0.012243581004440784,
-0.12207236886024475,
-0.07857198268175125,
-0.056339800357818604,
0.011931730434298515,
0.016305163502693176,
-0.06175883859395981,
0.03681829571723938,
0.001513611525297165,
-0.024070629850029945,
-0.042210597544908524,
0.03530459105968475,
0.08556114882230759,
0.05388500168919563,
0.011607599444687366,
-0.011094706133008003,
0.0036337613128125668,
0.009351528249680996,
0.09155880659818649,
-0.04573574289679527,
0.014217226766049862,
-0.013124027289450169,
-0.004831365309655666,
-0.11075935512781143,
-0.04538906365633011,
0.06288012862205505,
0.07698366045951843,
-0.05501646175980568,
0.10262726992368698,
-0.04691602662205696,
-0.05458296835422516,
0.037205975502729416,
0.04250003397464752,
0.05499950051307678,
0.026375334709882736,
0.04433798789978027,
0.05861898511648178,
0.05664028972387314,
-0.014985749498009682,
0.04295433685183525,
0.023429714143276215,
-0.04180002212524414,
-0.011286068707704544,
-0.026851888746023178,
0.09453558176755905,
0.027900230139493942,
-0.008838326670229435,
0.0006676548509858549,
0.011046744883060455,
-0.07514818012714386,
-0.029682118445634842,
-0.0037453060504049063,
0.05113665759563446,
0.07353205233812332,
-0.041113484650850296,
-0.03236045688390732,
0.060740649700164795,
0.07891401648521423,
-0.03578070551156998,
-0.08643569052219391,
0.024210626259446144,
-0.08163042366504669,
-0.0546581894159317,
-0.004286322742700577,
-0.11811812222003937,
-0.08835668861865997,
0.06990770250558853,
0.0049578528851270676,
0.08618272095918655,
0.019128309562802315,
-0.12402725964784622,
0.04449388012290001,
-0.03877704590559006,
-0.03103933297097683,
-0.02675573155283928,
0.015888040885329247,
-0.09231541305780411,
0.1050335019826889,
-0.06999553740024567,
-0.07835905253887177,
0.06699131429195404,
0.061348672956228256,
-0.03925667703151703,
0.022640248760581017,
0.04467872902750969,
0.04362403601408005,
-0.07890638709068298,
-5.340024955557965e-8,
-0.013748383149504662,
0.003967116121202707,
-0.030384238809347153,
0.06449556350708008,
0.09078341722488403,
0.02012045495212078,
-0.009945269674062729,
-0.0278093870729208,
-0.02525736391544342,
-0.04032132029533386,
0.07790714502334595,
0.04600314050912857,
0.0878775417804718,
-0.033425264060497284,
-0.024104943498969078,
-0.07600297778844833,
-0.005930829327553511,
-0.05798724293708801,
-0.050274092704057693,
0.05038367584347725,
-0.00734770717099309,
-0.05395342782139778,
-0.01995660364627838,
0.06048759073019028,
-0.0034420073498040438,
0.016109079122543335,
0.03080296516418457,
0.03997981175780296,
0.00430192518979311,
0.007189531810581684,
-0.021391745656728745,
0.08453641086816788,
0.014663859270513058,
0.0051248762756586075,
-0.013772711157798767,
-0.07017829269170761,
0.029080068692564964,
0.0604214072227478,
0.076760433614254,
0.07571133226156235,
0.03887828066945076,
0.07681318372488022,
0.026380058377981186,
0.09439300000667572,
-0.016741517931222916,
-0.03867478668689728,
-0.05854629725217819,
-0.01634383574128151,
-0.036484260112047195,
-0.006867432501167059,
0.007829112932085991,
-0.0669780746102333,
-0.019459594041109085,
0.01704438216984272,
0.034376345574855804,
0.03291169926524162,
0.0678633525967598,
-0.09894908964633942,
-0.07084891200065613,
-0.008388095535337925,
0.0205552875995636,
0.024455884471535683,
0.004211860243231058,
-0.014979812316596508
] | {
"pdf_file": "YSFDRVDRV6XMSNVXRD4KM266EUJZWMYZ.pdf",
"text": " \n \nUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT \nSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA \n \n \nANDREW S. WHITE, ) \n ) \n M o v a n t , ) vs. ) 1:08-cv-107-WTL-MJD \n ) \nUNITED STATES OF AMERICA. ) \n \n \n \n \n \n \nEntry Discussing Motion to Reconsider \n \nThis cause is before the court on the movant ’s motion to reconsider. Given the timing \nof the motion to reconsider relative to th e entry of final judgment on September 27, \n2012, and given the arguments set forth in su ch motion, the motion is treated as a \nmotion pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure . See Borrero v. \nCity of Chicago, 456 F.3d 698, 701-02 (7th Cir. 20 06) (explaining that whether a \nmotion filed within the time frame contempl ated by Rule 59(e) should be analyzed \nunder Rule 59(e) or Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure depends on the \nsubstance of the motion, not on the timing or label affixed to it). \n \n The purpose of a motion to alter or amend judgment under Rule 59(e) is to \nhave the court reconsider matters \"properly encompassed in a decision on the \nmerits.\" Osterneck v. Ernst and Whinney, 489 U.S. 169, 174 (1988). Rule 59(e) \n\"authorizes relief when a moving party 'clear ly establish[es] either a manifest error \nof law or fact' or 'present[s ] newly discovered evidence.'\" Souter v. International \nUnion , 993 F.2d 595, 599 (7th Cir. 1993) (quoting Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Meyer, \n781 F.2d 1260, 1268 (7th Cir. 1986)). \n \n The movant argues that the court failed to address two arguments in his \nmotion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255: that his counsel was ineffective for failing to \nobject to the parole search of his reside nce and that the court did not interpret the \n“anti-preemption provision” of the Federal Gun Control Act, 18 U.S.C. ' 927. A \ncondition of White's probation allowed una nnounced searches of his living quarters \nby law enforcement and/or probation officers. United States v. White , 368 F.3d 911, \n913 (7th Cir. 2004), cert. granted, judgment vacated, 543 U.S. 1105 (2005). \n \n While the court did not specifically address this provision of the law, the court \ndid address the Federal Gun Control Act and found that Indiana’s gun licensing laws \ndid not affect enforcement of this law. See United States v. Skoien , 614 F.3d 638 (7th \nCir. 2010)( en banc )(federal firearms proh ibitions in section 922( g) are constitutional, \neven when as applied to person s convicted of misdemeanors). \n \n The court’s consideration of the § 2255 action was plenary. There was no \nmeritorious claim asserted and the court finds none suggested by the motion to \nreconsider. There was in this case no manife st error of law or fact. The court did not \nmisapprehend White’s claims, nor did it misapply the law to those claims. Accordingly, the post-judgment motion to reconsider, treated as a motion to alter or \namend judgment [71], is denied. \n \nIT IS SO ORDERED. \n \n \n \n \nD a t e : \n \nDistribution: \n \nGerald A. Coraz \ngerald.coraz@usdoj.gov \n \nAndrew White No. 07026-028 \n8347 Glenside Ct. \nIndianapolis, IN 46263 \n \n \n12/06/2012\n \n _______________________________ \n Hon. William T. Lawrence, Judge \n United States District Court \n Southern District of Indiana "
} |
[
-0.03663727641105652,
-0.0446854904294014,
0.056427501142024994,
0.022384265437722206,
-0.05503782629966736,
0.06539221107959747,
-0.025687014684081078,
0.003894429188221693,
-0.04709069803357124,
0.031284481287002563,
-0.03797969967126846,
0.07148872315883636,
0.09884647279977798,
0.010125307366251945,
0.03708113357424736,
0.12572212517261505,
0.02704343944787979,
-0.034153107553720474,
-0.04566752910614014,
0.022062204778194427,
0.03894505649805069,
0.06310255080461502,
0.1466618776321411,
0.08935936540365219,
0.014522252604365349,
-0.011356242932379246,
0.0342007651925087,
-0.006032534874975681,
-0.1202465295791626,
0.1023743748664856,
0.03309568390250206,
-0.028378218412399292,
-0.042768485844135284,
0.033228229731321335,
0.03103598766028881,
0.07246065139770508,
-0.06254570186138153,
0.034237537533044815,
0.10054285824298859,
-0.010381204076111317,
-0.012403059750795364,
0.001476174220442772,
0.04962499067187309,
0.047828271985054016,
-0.00011868666479131207,
-0.069110207259655,
-0.011644135229289532,
0.02098751999437809,
-0.006134933792054653,
0.07358404248952866,
0.058863911777734756,
-0.026129361242055893,
-0.12063094973564148,
0.009862995706498623,
0.06360872089862823,
0.00018316628120373935,
-0.03213586285710335,
0.01755407266318798,
0.05462747439742088,
0.058560263365507126,
0.00767027260735631,
0.024637427181005478,
0.027056468650698662,
-0.005621477495878935,
0.002295722486451268,
-0.07848650962114334,
0.029921656474471092,
-0.005360851995646954,
-0.1082134023308754,
0.03498169779777527,
0.06043917313218117,
0.03801311179995537,
0.012777374126017094,
0.006789905484765768,
0.0022102396469563246,
-0.08799070119857788,
0.041900649666786194,
0.07281896471977234,
0.022514497861266136,
-0.09271800518035889,
0.07284270972013474,
0.02587839961051941,
0.054560285061597824,
-0.025752058252692223,
0.004203207325190306,
-0.07920372486114502,
0.022251587361097336,
-0.027982814237475395,
-0.028656207025051117,
0.0006647701375186443,
0.09140551835298538,
0.05200055614113808,
-0.03437644615769386,
0.06426579505205154,
0.012415827251970768,
0.036161284893751144,
0.03137362003326416,
0.07924333959817886,
-0.11454959213733673,
0.012869305908679962,
0.06917691230773926,
-0.032385122030973434,
-0.010187184438109398,
-0.0668848305940628,
-0.061021000146865845,
-0.04328932613134384,
0.05262918770313263,
-0.058021433651447296,
-0.09966812282800674,
0.011448798701167107,
0.07369662076234818,
-0.019863644614815712,
-0.0613168366253376,
-0.025716230273246765,
-0.021065350621938705,
0.00036887661553919315,
-0.012484421022236347,
-0.07295147329568863,
-0.015797674655914307,
0.010226549580693245,
0.011387977749109268,
-0.002774928929284215,
0.027170605957508087,
0.053213126957416534,
0.06730297952890396,
-0.05998228117823601,
-0.009911023080348969,
2.3431591745841293e-33,
0.028908418491482735,
-0.06969905644655228,
-0.03629535436630249,
0.10200817137956619,
-0.09837519377470016,
-0.004389961250126362,
0.026368243619799614,
-0.04453127831220627,
-0.06409645080566406,
0.003067521145567298,
-0.08788789808750153,
0.0011592304799705744,
0.007319855038076639,
0.025619594380259514,
0.05504611134529114,
-0.06718377023935318,
-0.07015828788280487,
0.044030770659446716,
0.07493391633033752,
-0.020185792818665504,
0.002552805235609412,
-0.0677015483379364,
-0.029237858951091766,
0.001478910562582314,
0.08698207885026932,
0.00235587521456182,
0.04557660222053528,
-0.049113813787698746,
-0.04057594761252403,
0.00028661967371590436,
-0.03537009283900261,
0.047562431544065475,
-0.06649983674287796,
-0.10475719720125198,
-0.051011595875024796,
-0.10262440145015717,
-0.10427331179380417,
-0.0064912778325378895,
-0.06448213011026382,
-0.05197249725461006,
-0.04049564525485039,
0.02573331445455551,
-0.06557387113571167,
0.023118488490581512,
0.08986235409975052,
-0.017564939334988594,
0.045215871185064316,
0.1035529300570488,
-0.08370952308177948,
-0.045367054641246796,
0.06542231142520905,
0.031771671026945114,
0.030457932502031326,
0.0038597015663981438,
-0.054870154708623886,
0.023201992735266685,
0.0048881880939006805,
0.017743445932865143,
0.07091221213340759,
0.020226309075951576,
0.09794368594884872,
-0.03736618161201477,
0.01254521869122982,
0.0006239187787286937,
0.048801492899656296,
0.0019901031628251076,
-0.11688768863677979,
0.004624930676072836,
0.027289723977446556,
0.011331628076732159,
0.004822853021323681,
-0.10887544602155685,
0.019707320258021355,
-0.031538836658000946,
-0.027620593085885048,
-0.03651461750268936,
0.07132310420274734,
0.07405871897935867,
-0.015749072656035423,
-0.08636896312236786,
-0.03068164549767971,
0.024866489693522453,
0.09757877886295319,
0.038176897913217545,
0.0025129506830126047,
0.010619217529892921,
0.011537055484950542,
-0.12691262364387512,
-0.06589527428150177,
0.01859857328236103,
-0.028466396033763885,
0.04327396675944328,
-0.05964000150561333,
-0.0062926593236625195,
0.02246200107038021,
-4.0384439030285856e-33,
-0.006730319932103157,
0.03534146770834923,
0.005347901023924351,
-0.020374365150928497,
-0.015492535196244717,
-0.0472179614007473,
0.027777163311839104,
0.019910048693418503,
0.024213407188653946,
-0.01372472196817398,
0.033670276403427124,
0.04259101301431656,
0.02289106324315071,
0.04432133957743645,
-0.05971542373299599,
-0.00312619237229228,
-0.003434572136029601,
-0.05988079681992531,
-0.004638964775949717,
-0.05211321637034416,
0.037467584013938904,
0.028113842010498047,
0.03780242055654526,
-0.009980102069675922,
-0.01307586207985878,
-0.0018234247108921409,
0.0028213621117174625,
-0.0013375296257436275,
0.033054169267416,
0.024258822202682495,
0.013177605345845222,
-0.06771725416183472,
0.009682988747954369,
0.04942147061228752,
0.0132180480286479,
0.059635575860738754,
0.017662739381194115,
-0.052466168999671936,
-0.045536890625953674,
0.12114863842725754,
0.05655718222260475,
-0.03447354957461357,
-0.044619787484407425,
-0.024151498451828957,
-0.0376163087785244,
-0.009369452483952045,
0.03791385889053345,
0.008203436620533466,
-0.07576937973499298,
-0.05570081248879433,
0.04476002976298332,
0.04377303645014763,
-0.07141300290822983,
-0.0016154756303876638,
0.01677895523607731,
0.04868004843592644,
-0.03769003599882126,
-0.08695097267627716,
0.09292464703321457,
-0.055899932980537415,
-0.053229231387376785,
0.08392859250307083,
0.025703152641654015,
-0.080192431807518,
-0.04074561223387718,
0.01812334731221199,
-0.04936971515417099,
-0.006639391183853149,
0.08952859044075012,
0.03851716220378876,
-0.00916481763124466,
-0.10698498040437698,
-0.07048659771680832,
-0.009436282329261303,
0.0892864316701889,
0.04648597165942192,
0.007684572599828243,
-0.06982863694429398,
-0.07778275012969971,
0.07432463765144348,
0.016194619238376617,
0.0076608010567724705,
-0.028854049742221832,
-0.05339004099369049,
0.010572594590485096,
-0.043818920850753784,
0.03031022660434246,
-0.007919366471469402,
-0.016051622107625008,
0.054398421198129654,
-0.029667362570762634,
-0.07076796889305115,
0.02989477477967739,
-0.0273144394159317,
-0.08582191169261932,
-5.085037813046256e-8,
-0.0595562607049942,
0.06127683073282242,
0.04673701897263527,
0.01788826659321785,
0.014499950222671032,
-0.011525462381541729,
-0.023270122706890106,
0.006076652556657791,
0.05072059854865074,
0.024049725383520126,
0.0910428911447525,
-0.03722359240055084,
-0.07313364744186401,
0.05972019210457802,
-0.05691908672451973,
0.014862915500998497,
-0.02984633669257164,
-0.04233168065547943,
-0.04748768359422684,
-0.03699047118425369,
-0.02414412423968315,
-0.013120364397764206,
-0.09607580304145813,
0.0029430403374135494,
0.0322415716946125,
0.06106695160269737,
-0.10323037207126617,
0.06322470307350159,
-0.0031589949503540993,
0.08977456390857697,
0.06180894374847412,
0.01652725227177143,
-0.024326832965016365,
-0.028547003865242004,
-0.045765116810798645,
0.014017242006957531,
-0.00209369626827538,
0.06735298037528992,
-0.002160869538784027,
-0.039517592638731,
-0.13801643252372742,
-0.04434172436594963,
0.08040240406990051,
0.04240585118532181,
-0.016190286725759506,
-0.06203022971749306,
-0.012373296543955803,
0.033597320318222046,
0.020347921177744865,
0.023804888129234314,
-0.013895106501877308,
-0.041108664125204086,
-0.0410151332616806,
-0.01901431940495968,
0.06018206104636192,
-0.004988998640328646,
0.01577441394329071,
-0.030684685334563255,
-0.039357494562864304,
-0.019275346770882607,
-0.021147534251213074,
-0.07572983205318451,
0.01166185550391674,
-0.0197431817650795
] | {
"pdf_file": "UE63E6G7FS4PMX2SXEHC22Y753FSQD4N.pdf",
"text": "Rep. Blumenauer Statement on President Obama’s Afghanistan Speech \nWednesday, 02 December 2009 04:41\nWashington, D.C. – Congressman Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore) issued the following statement in\nresponse to President Obama’s remarks on the Administration strategy in Afghanistan and\nPakistan: \n \n I appreciate President Obama and his administration taking the necessary time to reevaluate\nAmerica’s strategy in Afghanistan. It is imperative to think through the implications of sending\nmore troops abroad, to engage our allies around the globe, and establish benchmarks as well\nas an exit strategy. Had this happened before the United States invaded Iraq, the world would\nbe a different place today.\n \n I agree with everything President Obama has done to assess our role in Afghanistan, but I am\nunable to embrace his conclusion. It is unclear that 30,000 more troops will resolve the conflict,\nor at least allow us to leave in eighteen months. It may actually weaken our ability to deal with\nlarger security and economic threats at home and abroad - from terrorist recruiting and nuclear\nweapons to unemployment and our budget deficit.\n \n The President argued that it will be more costly to muddle through in Afghanistan. Our\nexperience to date in this troubled country and other flash points around the world does not\nsuggest 30,000 more troops is going to make his other initiatives more effective.\n \n 1 / 1"
} |
[
-0.00986518245190382,
0.03335200250148773,
-0.00871492363512516,
-0.04714853689074516,
-0.03902300074696541,
0.032497260719537735,
-0.09197579324245453,
-0.06389294564723969,
0.029586222022771835,
0.04708722233772278,
-0.01950761489570141,
-0.01104265172034502,
-0.016202939674258232,
0.0553508922457695,
0.02181589975953102,
0.05357551947236061,
0.016725799068808556,
0.030874717980623245,
-0.002394221257418394,
0.12388718873262405,
0.03043331764638424,
0.03942239284515381,
-0.0024800682440400124,
0.0012923611793667078,
0.03324147313833237,
-0.051745761185884476,
-0.04857882484793663,
-0.0044181738048791885,
-0.006400894373655319,
-0.003306668484583497,
0.05760877579450607,
0.016920898109674454,
-0.09101483970880508,
-0.03605524078011513,
0.07300078123807907,
0.05976906791329384,
0.04970796778798103,
0.011973096989095211,
-0.09915658831596375,
0.07590024173259735,
-0.08370418846607208,
0.034332629293203354,
0.02418474480509758,
0.02374875918030739,
-0.017977412790060043,
-0.04108396917581558,
0.02867627888917923,
-0.05255206674337387,
0.020059088245034218,
-0.022619806230068207,
0.07217402756214142,
0.018329784274101257,
0.04231170564889908,
0.03002714179456234,
-0.08243343234062195,
0.02173927053809166,
-0.009842047467827797,
-0.011297046206891537,
-0.11109406501054764,
-0.006376604083925486,
-0.009124891832470894,
-0.02715493179857731,
0.0320843830704689,
-0.053359489887952805,
0.02050587348639965,
-0.016949912533164024,
0.049433574080467224,
-0.0526227168738842,
-0.03863995894789696,
-0.12945201992988586,
-0.023800741881132126,
0.019149592146277428,
-0.016454674303531647,
0.003126708324998617,
0.023421647027134895,
0.01211518980562687,
0.038891617208719254,
0.15508900582790375,
0.1228109821677208,
-0.198745459318161,
0.1072564572095871,
0.05478724464774132,
0.0856020450592041,
0.022313280031085014,
-0.005755895283073187,
0.01827213354408741,
-0.030023708939552307,
0.019748004153370857,
0.08995485305786133,
0.04245955869555473,
-0.00142604426946491,
-0.04823211207985878,
0.02884822152554989,
-0.11883780360221863,
0.09653414040803909,
0.06094053015112877,
-0.010096670128405094,
-0.03888960927724838,
0.006504185032099485,
-0.009394229389727116,
0.03862926736474037,
-0.07700386643409729,
0.00809441041201353,
-0.06002872437238693,
0.02859264239668846,
0.037789009511470795,
-0.09569991379976273,
0.051113251596689224,
0.006362501066178083,
0.05152873322367668,
0.09419577568769455,
0.03714573755860329,
0.05717623233795166,
0.03053680621087551,
-0.03129570558667183,
0.14273543655872345,
-0.09466695040464401,
-0.050336867570877075,
0.11413250863552094,
-0.053960829973220825,
-0.05861135199666023,
-0.031351931393146515,
-0.06519212573766708,
0.010086297988891602,
0.048090435564517975,
-0.08976054191589355,
-0.033182982355356216,
1.0292194153903122e-33,
0.019752411171793938,
0.04671338200569153,
-0.021414734423160553,
-0.02879587933421135,
-0.03649919852614403,
-0.05024125799536705,
0.06380252540111542,
0.00508875260129571,
-0.04635312035679817,
-0.034437719732522964,
0.008525744080543518,
0.0016984615940600634,
0.043263014405965805,
-0.007606080267578363,
-0.003428824245929718,
-0.0869351178407669,
-0.020101582631468773,
0.0434064157307148,
0.02343229576945305,
-0.08621153235435486,
0.03920269012451172,
0.011371053755283356,
0.014274963177740574,
-0.021141471341252327,
0.07834317535161972,
-0.03716542571783066,
-0.052343983203172684,
0.030206603929400444,
-0.04392413794994354,
-0.02676991932094097,
0.049935225397348404,
0.009490096010267735,
0.13934245705604553,
-0.04112706333398819,
0.05986948683857918,
0.007807780057191849,
0.06117551401257515,
0.00491518247872591,
-0.08630354702472687,
-0.001371970633044839,
0.05601326748728752,
0.02986864186823368,
-0.03719617798924446,
0.05140366032719612,
0.004713039379566908,
-0.03387323021888733,
0.036726001650094986,
0.052993111312389374,
-0.03860916569828987,
0.043111156672239304,
0.024928513914346695,
0.04859727621078491,
-0.1487174928188324,
0.005667749792337418,
-0.01249638944864273,
-0.041944123804569244,
-0.011365795508027077,
-0.06346724927425385,
-0.03663928061723709,
-0.006863579619675875,
0.05342261865735054,
0.05489183962345123,
-0.05916557088494301,
0.0806368812918663,
-0.05169929563999176,
-0.08695444464683533,
0.05145833641290665,
0.03752821311354637,
0.0441482737660408,
-0.026526015251874924,
0.0092011708766222,
0.027857938781380653,
-0.010920332744717598,
-0.06204729154706001,
-0.05088046193122864,
-0.019949646666646004,
0.0093899080529809,
0.03720059245824814,
0.06351512670516968,
-0.01782606542110443,
-0.015740536153316498,
0.021445903927087784,
-0.03152189403772354,
0.042946308851242065,
0.04095401614904404,
-0.018463226035237312,
0.026891466230154037,
-0.00085832440527156,
-0.08983589708805084,
-0.06928692758083344,
0.013013733550906181,
0.051364265382289886,
0.07913043349981308,
-0.014886468648910522,
0.059603944420814514,
-2.4334004065288178e-33,
-0.035150766372680664,
-0.05939124524593353,
0.0558839775621891,
0.0070792306214571,
0.048413652926683426,
-0.012443424202501774,
-0.03428541496396065,
-0.12110935896635056,
0.0371037982404232,
-0.04146372526884079,
-0.10583241283893585,
0.025569355115294456,
0.016823193058371544,
0.01225370168685913,
-0.02305050939321518,
-0.04780050739645958,
-0.04683815315365791,
0.007795113604515791,
0.013574441894888878,
0.045880574733018875,
-0.010140806436538696,
0.0897144004702568,
-0.018628396093845367,
0.07489130645990372,
-0.01837199181318283,
0.01469588652253151,
-0.06490631401538849,
-0.04274873062968254,
-0.010006866417825222,
0.02795886993408203,
0.010485010221600533,
-0.06437737494707108,
-0.08952707797288895,
0.002580006141215563,
-0.05269647762179375,
-0.09371251612901688,
0.00037513082497753203,
-0.053029343485832214,
-0.05811653286218643,
0.023751666769385338,
0.038791537284851074,
-0.0010987776331603527,
-0.058914411813020706,
0.008069602772593498,
-0.06831734627485275,
-0.06665868312120438,
-0.07008542120456696,
-0.036810435354709625,
0.045582178980112076,
-0.044992923736572266,
-0.015189328230917454,
-0.050384655594825745,
0.04529168829321861,
-0.006602356676012278,
-0.03583328425884247,
0.06325274705886841,
-0.012708107940852642,
-0.00002801561822707299,
-0.013938017189502716,
0.023489737883210182,
0.07398085296154022,
0.06378668546676636,
-0.0306748878210783,
0.04078035056591034,
0.04790559038519859,
-0.018218014389276505,
0.020572898909449577,
-0.0058624763041734695,
-0.09972452372312546,
0.04001254588365555,
-0.05159332975745201,
-0.07849536091089249,
-0.029802735894918442,
0.030425209552049637,
0.01868010312318802,
0.03451267629861832,
0.12359586358070374,
-0.0296101626008749,
-0.02011883072555065,
0.09456472843885422,
-0.013135675340890884,
-0.04041195660829544,
-0.0002845745184458792,
-0.01610194705426693,
0.03810306265950203,
0.03186938539147377,
-0.0002973258087877184,
-0.05003706365823746,
0.03315785154700279,
0.05974491685628891,
-0.03194320201873779,
-0.04390084370970726,
0.06560898572206497,
0.0007044241647236049,
-0.032914042472839355,
-5.079087017634265e-8,
0.019585521891713142,
-0.01202362310141325,
-0.1208791509270668,
-0.03456876054406166,
-0.04569731280207634,
-0.08253086358308792,
0.0662267729640007,
0.028402678668498993,
-0.026887517422437668,
0.027736157178878784,
0.012538976036012173,
0.06715365499258041,
-0.07803189754486084,
-0.01080651767551899,
0.030307885259389877,
-0.01107813511043787,
-0.04253847151994705,
0.030059773474931717,
-0.08528122305870056,
-0.04175007343292236,
-0.0815763771533966,
-0.03873404115438461,
-0.043100424110889435,
0.009319916367530823,
-0.0006962495390325785,
0.022017544135451317,
0.04369683191180229,
0.057477712631225586,
0.060850728303194046,
0.05010329186916351,
0.029430564492940903,
0.034826528280973434,
-0.04018964618444443,
0.012237154878675938,
-0.05598549172282219,
-0.04363289102911949,
0.07885821163654327,
0.04853099584579468,
0.0491398386657238,
0.05252780765295029,
-0.0013436197768896818,
0.0614805668592453,
-0.002369551919400692,
0.024604063481092453,
0.03938043862581253,
0.005655895918607712,
-0.026005929335951805,
-0.05604976788163185,
-0.013209087774157524,
-0.08659277856349945,
0.013926222920417786,
-0.03253534808754921,
-0.01280337106436491,
0.0369819812476635,
0.007480177562683821,
0.0798448920249939,
-0.013038045726716518,
0.0293396208435297,
0.013058383017778397,
0.03555231913924217,
0.019171569496393204,
-0.004028885159641504,
0.06687822192907333,
-0.02174658142030239
] | {
"pdf_file": "LIPMDFTNS2NRGFUZE65J6AKPXYJSCR6P.pdf",
"text": "May 12, 2006- Farr Secures Vets Cemetery Authority\n \n\"When the Department of Veterans Affairs pointed to the State Veterans Cemetery program as\nthe way forward for a Ft. Ord cemetery earlier this year, I set about finding a way to make it\nhappen. I've been working with the VA for almost a decade to create a Ft. Ord cemetery and\nfinally I can see light at the end of the tunnel,\" said Farr.\n \nIn order to clear the path for a State Veterans Cemetery, Farr wrote directing language into the\nFY07 Military Quality of Life and Veterans Affairs Appropriations Bill which passed the House\nAppropriations Committee this week. Farr's language:\n \n - creates a pilot program so the VA and Fort Ord Reuse Authority (FORA) can develop a\nunique public-private partnership to fund a state veterans cemetery at Fort Ord; and \n - puts California at the top of the list for State Veterans Cemetery Grant approval once an \napplication is made. \n \n\"I'm well aware of the state's financial constraints - that's why I've cleared the path for the state\nto get federal money to cover 100% of construction costs and for the creation of a public-private\npartnership that will relieve the state of all budgetary obligations. Together, the Feds, the state\nand the local community can make this happen,\" said Farr.\n \nThis afternoon, Farr will be discussing this public-private partnership at the Annual FORA\nLegislative meeting - 3 p.m. at the FORA Conference Facility/Bridge Center.\n \nLegislative language authored by Rep. Farr and approved by the House Appropriations\nCommittee on May 10, 2006:\n \nUnder \"Fort Ord Cemetery\":\n\"The Committee notes the success of the military housing RCI as a public/private partnership.\nThe Committee encourages the Department of Veterans Affairs to work with the Fort Ord Reuse\nAuthority in Monterey, California to develop a pilot program to demonstrate the cost\neffectiveness of using public/private partnerships in establishing a state veterans cemetery at\nFort Ord.\"\n \n 1 / 2 May 12, 2006- Farr Secures Vets Cemetery Authority\nUnder \"Grants for Construction of State Veterans Cemeteries\":\n\"The Committee encourages the Department to work with States for maximum usage of this\ngrant program. Given that over ten percent of the nation's veterans reside in California, the\nCommittee encourages the Department to work with the state of California as it applies for a\ngrant.\"\n 2 / 2"
} |
[
-0.11883839964866638,
0.04829868674278259,
-0.0025480559561401606,
-0.011011209338903427,
0.05195074528455734,
0.010291832499206066,
0.1154332384467125,
0.0007007909007370472,
-0.08592535555362701,
-0.07065396010875702,
0.0013317164266481996,
-0.035472381860017776,
0.018434155732393265,
-0.006737178191542625,
0.024402987211942673,
-0.029503243044018745,
-0.058138374239206314,
-0.05043954402208328,
-0.020765526220202446,
0.029036032035946846,
-0.06367600709199905,
0.024029914289712906,
0.0262432973831892,
-0.006037362851202488,
-0.011076544411480427,
-0.0014006864512339234,
-0.018619801849126816,
0.03277004510164261,
0.0028860096354037523,
-0.05694391578435898,
-0.04394163936376572,
0.025414075702428818,
0.08790954202413559,
-0.02499123103916645,
-0.03668315336108208,
0.0062413448467850685,
-0.06646791845560074,
-0.0671444833278656,
0.020564241334795952,
0.04238877445459366,
0.021880215033888817,
-0.04288247600197792,
-0.03437700495123863,
0.06146686151623726,
0.0656372681260109,
-0.0785202905535698,
0.029487011954188347,
0.010798297822475433,
0.06332410126924515,
-0.04508465901017189,
-0.01823394186794758,
-0.027721041813492775,
-0.0036737609189003706,
-0.03659451752901077,
0.054250262677669525,
-0.02085655927658081,
0.015034922398626804,
-0.060095224529504776,
0.016393909230828285,
-0.03323858231306076,
0.01750349812209606,
-0.0005952207720838487,
-0.16348379850387573,
0.08492093533277512,
-0.07583844661712646,
0.0161097701638937,
0.048382941633462906,
-0.007598146330565214,
-0.024985475465655327,
0.05949747934937477,
0.0658901110291481,
-0.03513742983341217,
0.0008843158720992506,
-0.11567969620227814,
0.049390342086553574,
0.03360460326075554,
0.055154237896203995,
0.026383694261312485,
0.053694359958171844,
0.038932498544454575,
0.0004393816343508661,
0.0180604699999094,
-0.09288253635168076,
-0.004073987249284983,
-0.0008234609267674387,
-0.04883106052875519,
-0.006677441764622927,
-0.023541681468486786,
-0.03813307359814644,
0.05245159938931465,
-0.042493823915719986,
-0.055899728089571,
0.08681583404541016,
-0.04896170645952225,
-0.08339672535657883,
-0.0457635223865509,
0.029042238369584084,
0.03465776517987251,
-0.08649188280105591,
0.4062184691429138,
0.03594949096441269,
0.018697189167141914,
0.0979783833026886,
-0.007865204475820065,
0.023714108392596245,
-0.05756505951285362,
-0.06109985336661339,
-0.006620500702410936,
0.007060033269226551,
0.021669859066605568,
-0.024405108764767647,
-0.033514637500047684,
0.00025015627034008503,
0.03170765936374664,
0.04407161846756935,
0.09463243186473846,
-0.035580113530159,
-0.0045343064703047276,
0.043714847415685654,
0.00020504710846580565,
-0.002858717693015933,
-0.024884076789021492,
0.0037606365513056517,
0.014041258953511715,
0.07781578600406647,
-0.1323145031929016,
0.0068764761090278625,
-7.2201250750405e-33,
0.007334581576287746,
0.002726183971390128,
0.012147537432610989,
-0.002440247917547822,
0.027932560071349144,
0.03927065059542656,
0.003743888111785054,
-0.04643532633781433,
-0.014492551796138287,
0.05360198765993118,
0.006590632256120443,
0.03664784133434296,
-0.023135676980018616,
0.03275369852781296,
0.07811082899570465,
0.009627518244087696,
0.007964123040437698,
0.0028742437716573477,
-0.0018807238666340709,
0.004691542126238346,
-0.012402275577187538,
-0.0008041393011808395,
-0.023038707673549652,
0.04297299310564995,
-0.028259985148906708,
-0.06694644689559937,
0.038539037108421326,
-0.07085712999105453,
0.020109260454773903,
0.001460324041545391,
0.0014639950823038816,
0.049912355840206146,
-0.02594558522105217,
0.0008223677286878228,
-0.03757276013493538,
-0.028740663081407547,
0.03337514027953148,
-0.07462829351425171,
-0.035983964800834656,
0.025680823251605034,
-0.050139084458351135,
0.010837196372449398,
-0.04243791848421097,
-0.002668545348569751,
-0.004916265141218901,
0.16647927463054657,
-0.0011541391722857952,
-0.004960660357028246,
-0.06482207775115967,
0.06976216286420822,
-0.0028182310052216053,
-0.02132517658174038,
-0.11613703519105911,
0.04333868995308876,
-0.0033509607892483473,
-0.020106570795178413,
0.016554009169340134,
-0.043971188366413116,
0.020619438961148262,
-0.009089959785342216,
0.009713641367852688,
0.039391469210386276,
-0.012487754225730896,
0.009350251406431198,
-0.08647788316011429,
-0.04851773753762245,
0.02447775937616825,
-0.008494960144162178,
0.023063570261001587,
-0.012638214975595474,
-0.05100997909903526,
0.03675990551710129,
0.03771744668483734,
0.030916057527065277,
-0.028798431158065796,
-0.01926880143582821,
-0.019831717014312744,
0.03583517670631409,
0.08063048869371414,
0.00649732630699873,
0.03545527532696724,
-0.041958946734666824,
0.006693818140774965,
-0.024078864604234695,
0.09502369910478592,
0.054634999483823776,
0.004220988135784864,
-0.05180729925632477,
0.01021517813205719,
-0.041098661720752716,
-0.03574559465050697,
0.06131820008158684,
-0.0030944310128688812,
0.08796171098947525,
0.006000818684697151,
4.4925641867161134e-33,
-0.07716735452413559,
0.01899317093193531,
-0.03573813661932945,
0.0887979194521904,
-0.01755509153008461,
-0.0027626880910247564,
0.037273939698934555,
0.09013677388429642,
-0.09250447154045105,
0.0680299699306488,
0.022390201687812805,
-0.045089662075042725,
0.030878892168402672,
0.044495198875665665,
-0.005799654871225357,
0.03523358702659607,
0.06968843936920166,
-0.004063474480062723,
-0.028155116364359856,
-0.03572935611009598,
-0.030507177114486694,
-0.03237851336598396,
-0.0024998304434120655,
0.034929435700178146,
-0.04148077219724655,
0.030205287039279938,
0.04858911409974098,
0.0632987916469574,
-0.021693143993616104,
0.036800533533096313,
0.03896567225456238,
-0.023581488057971,
-0.05063262954354286,
-0.05820295587182045,
0.04826247692108154,
0.08404397964477539,
0.03678114339709282,
-0.0007768925279378891,
0.024848245084285736,
-0.05051735043525696,
0.039668887853622437,
-0.010082785040140152,
0.002244437113404274,
0.11697717010974884,
-0.021961307153105736,
-0.005805923603475094,
-0.048092879354953766,
0.003788944333791733,
0.035172659903764725,
0.07729728519916534,
-0.09319712221622467,
-0.011992926709353924,
-0.021968109533190727,
0.04129430651664734,
-0.022958293557167053,
0.004160518292337656,
-0.0432187058031559,
0.0702132061123848,
-0.01905948668718338,
0.0004752702370751649,
0.005480603780597448,
0.026761434972286224,
-0.033612821251153946,
0.01346849836409092,
-0.022746674716472626,
0.03873894736170769,
-0.024523282423615456,
-0.03632815554738045,
-0.0017924589337781072,
-0.052569907158613205,
0.006689464673399925,
-0.025846485048532486,
-0.1348353624343872,
0.0011394252069294453,
-0.047169335186481476,
-0.05347497761249542,
-0.018427148461341858,
-0.007304163184016943,
-0.009657083079218864,
-0.037726134061813354,
-0.033999841660261154,
0.01841733604669571,
-0.008003143593668938,
-0.005512353032827377,
-0.03353199362754822,
-0.0201805979013443,
0.021665804088115692,
0.01075822301208973,
-0.05747472122311592,
0.01969684660434723,
-0.007240809965878725,
0.023037107661366463,
0.12023406475782394,
0.0032419958151876926,
0.010150063782930374,
-1.3403668397415913e-8,
-0.046724583953619,
0.04062063992023468,
-0.05561641603708267,
-0.0018853341462090611,
0.056323979049921036,
0.049638908356428146,
-0.04154156893491745,
0.0325038842856884,
0.02574923262000084,
-0.018780937418341637,
0.06920813769102097,
0.02598794549703598,
-0.02782331220805645,
0.05757509544491768,
0.09128093719482422,
-0.01532574463635683,
-0.10472093522548676,
-0.027585938572883606,
-0.016222817823290825,
-0.035399287939071655,
-0.010461363941431046,
-0.013999390415847301,
-0.0002939800324384123,
-0.08362972736358643,
0.007932317443192005,
0.006960071157664061,
-0.04422977939248085,
0.07475824654102325,
0.07440952211618423,
-0.04058071970939636,
-0.0018266832921653986,
0.01985001191496849,
0.014382191933691502,
0.020585300400853157,
0.02213379554450512,
-0.06437048316001892,
-0.06369856745004654,
0.01613914780318737,
0.009907381609082222,
-0.0055595203302800655,
-0.05467313155531883,
-0.0233115516602993,
0.07046928256750107,
0.006468005012720823,
-0.047700025141239166,
-0.0036470729392021894,
0.007837599143385887,
-0.004974569659680128,
-0.01241857185959816,
-0.07781214267015457,
-0.0009409073390997946,
-0.008002524264156818,
0.006034235469996929,
0.08434933423995972,
0.10730371624231339,
0.011427774094045162,
0.013366665691137314,
-0.012747352942824364,
0.061454374343156815,
0.03564131259918213,
0.1587459295988083,
0.12640950083732605,
0.04654904082417488,
-0.015717294067144394
] | {
"pdf_file": "BOV6TNUHLZUKL6WNKWPBOXHXPL22HUNC.pdf",
"text": ""
} |
[
-0.07568744570016861,
-0.011610214598476887,
0.044317543506622314,
-0.0017115523805841804,
0.06387194246053696,
-0.008790086954832077,
-0.048266392201185226,
0.01725953258574009,
-0.11980970948934555,
0.061541780829429626,
0.03947003185749054,
-0.041664812713861465,
0.04786977544426918,
-0.05875404551625252,
-0.07279748469591141,
0.055866122245788574,
0.051239799708127975,
0.02061135694384575,
-0.09372181445360184,
-0.035408519208431244,
0.07576294988393784,
0.01818498596549034,
-0.0025952919386327267,
-0.021091392263770103,
0.0558132529258728,
-0.0008772790897637606,
-0.10140011459589005,
-0.011993608437478542,
0.027453064918518066,
-0.07983998209238052,
-0.07852298021316528,
0.09528854489326477,
0.022112127393484116,
-0.06323377043008804,
-0.001310931984335184,
0.024299953132867813,
0.028236858546733856,
-0.02199413627386093,
0.02110770158469677,
-0.0037896547000855207,
-0.006924332119524479,
-0.010223118588328362,
-0.013959714211523533,
-0.04676423594355583,
-0.10508128255605698,
-0.044619955122470856,
0.06900659948587418,
0.015980547294020653,
0.027307050302624702,
0.005899322684854269,
-0.009587965905666351,
-0.00022679516405332834,
0.02889287658035755,
-0.007631688844412565,
-0.03397313132882118,
0.0007899898337200284,
-0.02378500998020172,
-0.0030961057636886835,
-0.032718952745199203,
0.022286955267190933,
-0.019681228324770927,
0.02419920451939106,
-0.08560878783464432,
-0.04146558791399002,
-0.006442226003855467,
0.0024280836805701256,
-0.03354564309120178,
-0.03519970923662186,
0.01510277483612299,
-0.11804065853357315,
0.039667561650276184,
0.016703931614756584,
-0.0280628465116024,
0.017441311851143837,
-0.013094096444547176,
0.0913003534078598,
0.06915407627820969,
0.0034800127614289522,
0.05553066357970238,
0.005904335528612137,
-0.05392071232199669,
-0.01577630080282688,
0.12571851909160614,
-0.040679458528757095,
-0.0241431575268507,
-0.032223690301179886,
-0.004430882167071104,
0.1226002424955368,
0.10946711897850037,
-0.008142003789544106,
-0.0016127049457281828,
-0.0871729850769043,
-0.0025544296950101852,
0.05069003254175186,
-0.0005074170185253024,
0.0766889825463295,
0.007313487585633993,
-0.08337943255901337,
-0.02876059152185917,
0.020719021558761597,
0.01498685497790575,
-0.12440693378448486,
0.04111780971288681,
-0.01460221502929926,
0.007373483385890722,
0.0011919699609279633,
-0.03892103582620621,
0.041153691709041595,
-0.027952127158641815,
0.014059615321457386,
0.05412711575627327,
0.1392393857240677,
0.0018945133779197931,
0.07148302346467972,
-0.04529957473278046,
-0.010464686900377274,
-0.05854141339659691,
-0.09989923238754272,
0.033091869205236435,
0.02830934338271618,
0.05280886963009834,
0.03848215565085411,
0.010591615922749043,
0.014714443124830723,
0.037540435791015625,
-0.047936029732227325,
-0.030679961666464806,
8.297077734433356e-33,
-0.010350781492888927,
0.060928162187337875,
-0.014012020081281662,
-0.10832573473453522,
-0.05782245099544525,
-0.025157315656542778,
0.02478565089404583,
0.006843115668743849,
-0.002932202070951462,
-0.09259507060050964,
-0.07203857600688934,
-0.01573515497148037,
0.07983946055173874,
0.027084937319159508,
0.005032894667237997,
-0.09667856246232986,
0.032368745654821396,
-0.015427283011376858,
-0.02888299524784088,
0.08972759544849396,
-0.08729290962219238,
-0.05778227373957634,
-0.08472973853349686,
0.029857218265533447,
-0.01899823173880577,
0.04044010117650032,
0.026642972603440285,
-0.03793833777308464,
-0.043722596019506454,
0.027687523514032364,
0.14002522826194763,
-0.03624862805008888,
0.026535581797361374,
0.061672456562519073,
0.04728938266634941,
0.0054560438729822636,
-0.016477638855576515,
-0.02624342404305935,
-0.027135077863931656,
-0.011598861776292324,
-0.03715994581580162,
0.07427423447370529,
0.002702551195397973,
0.015142112039029598,
0.03942673280835152,
-0.07597348093986511,
0.06025517359375954,
0.09201497584581375,
-0.04010976478457451,
0.05919520556926727,
0.03718156740069389,
0.10783325880765915,
0.037408310920000076,
0.00743141071870923,
0.03598717972636223,
0.04602276161313057,
0.032333314418792725,
0.013815708458423615,
-0.008450536988675594,
0.07361557334661484,
-0.05694272369146347,
0.013684301637113094,
-0.033674661070108414,
0.012510828673839569,
-0.021550938487052917,
-0.047611258924007416,
-0.06442774832248688,
-0.06430894881486893,
-0.00403438787907362,
0.07934872061014175,
0.03705884888768196,
-0.060284316539764404,
-0.04953981935977936,
0.053393829613924026,
0.0226680226624012,
-0.004850467201322317,
0.07899262756109238,
0.07447271794080734,
-0.012307625263929367,
-0.008904081769287586,
0.0553065650165081,
-0.036049116402864456,
-0.031070595607161522,
-0.06461788713932037,
-0.13588476181030273,
-0.018619289621710777,
-0.03717266395688057,
0.02324306033551693,
-0.02541373111307621,
-0.028880717232823372,
0.12234526872634888,
0.018772460520267487,
0.00579622620716691,
-0.021048812195658684,
0.027332166209816933,
-6.776556689861526e-33,
0.012913074344396591,
0.045843467116355896,
0.022037388756871223,
0.05714988708496094,
-0.018666096031665802,
-0.036951687186956406,
0.0800802931189537,
-0.05495011806488037,
0.014905626885592937,
-0.00026871133013628423,
0.021885201334953308,
0.08215149492025375,
-0.046733614057302475,
0.044285714626312256,
-0.0704781636595726,
0.006166001316159964,
0.03128235414624214,
0.02381647191941738,
0.052745524793863297,
-0.02551986649632454,
-0.08202029764652252,
0.1603906750679016,
-0.09770940244197845,
-0.029325636103749275,
-0.06347019225358963,
-0.03856455534696579,
-0.06350235641002655,
0.018991999328136444,
-0.07671482115983963,
-0.06178445741534233,
-0.008720329031348228,
-0.05923498794436455,
0.0007294934475794435,
0.040871165692806244,
-0.009576992131769657,
0.0028766002506017685,
0.0921364426612854,
-0.04908769950270653,
0.010517114773392677,
0.03234124928712845,
0.0003700659144669771,
0.033663153648376465,
0.013970732688903809,
0.018144207075238228,
-0.06869129091501236,
0.006604295689612627,
-0.05554685369133949,
0.00761842867359519,
0.05819878354668617,
0.07024257630109787,
-0.006420409772545099,
0.065750852227211,
0.045392561703920364,
-0.01972820982336998,
-0.05361919105052948,
-0.08980683982372284,
0.054944053292274475,
0.014853605069220066,
-0.09937403351068497,
0.03710165247321129,
0.014233697205781937,
0.06871996074914932,
0.01453793328255415,
0.013943434692919254,
0.06512618064880371,
-0.04239930212497711,
-0.05720287933945656,
-0.019550010561943054,
-0.050634849816560745,
0.05280246585607529,
-0.06375017762184143,
-0.004686316475272179,
0.1302817314863205,
-0.06295943260192871,
0.023959381505846977,
-0.004369150847196579,
0.010114096105098724,
-0.041993167251348495,
-0.025488626211881638,
-0.07600236684083939,
0.049660906195640564,
-0.05179125815629959,
0.050588931888341904,
-0.0023158034309744835,
0.036289818584918976,
0.04192095622420311,
0.006483995355665684,
0.01108672097325325,
0.027871903032064438,
0.01730949617922306,
-0.07123056799173355,
-0.07396809011697769,
0.013622067868709564,
0.04450003802776337,
0.12686093151569366,
-4.962183552947863e-8,
0.040726691484451294,
0.011214529164135456,
-0.10345921665430069,
0.04081214219331741,
0.04261067509651184,
0.0524916872382164,
-0.03463190793991089,
0.024098917841911316,
0.05367312207818031,
0.04292739927768707,
-0.01894480548799038,
0.07793600112199783,
-0.08154046535491943,
0.01570894569158554,
0.03207532688975334,
-0.06228399649262428,
-0.007654979825019836,
-0.011593400500714779,
-0.05051036551594734,
0.011391500011086464,
0.03005138412117958,
-0.0013075548922643065,
-0.0899052545428276,
0.03225850686430931,
0.02386580780148506,
-0.03320807218551636,
0.07244819402694702,
0.026017693802714348,
0.0842226892709732,
0.0301473680883646,
-0.040930964052677155,
0.014974758960306644,
-0.005528188776224852,
-0.055864833295345306,
-0.02805088274180889,
-0.028570692986249924,
-0.0913010835647583,
0.08515887707471848,
0.039408884942531586,
0.05065257102251053,
0.023949475958943367,
0.02527298778295517,
0.050193075090646744,
-0.03405391424894333,
0.030879847705364227,
0.013893356546759605,
-0.09215104579925537,
-0.030976776033639908,
0.058293480426073074,
-0.061232030391693115,
0.03975138068199158,
-0.017589671537280083,
-0.0018597450107336044,
-0.0010079968487843871,
0.01228735689073801,
0.009475860744714737,
0.013707341626286507,
-0.05030608922243118,
0.007247490808367729,
0.013474032282829285,
-0.012855774722993374,
-0.07016825675964355,
-0.02196015790104866,
-0.06924428045749664
] | {
"pdf_file": "37WOUPCWLZGR4AFDBNNHKUHNTVLYXVLD.pdf",
"text": "MONTANA WHEAT & BARLEY COMMITTEE FY 2010 BUDGET\nRESEARCH 32% 954,554\nMONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY\nCRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE AT WHEAT & BARLEY RESEARCH FACILITIES JACOBSEN $227,000HOST PLANT RESISTANCE, ETC. FOR IPM OF WHEAT STEM SAWFLY WEAVER $134,640EVAL. OF MATERIALS/PRACTICES CONTRIBUTING TO ECON. CROP PRODUCTION IN MT MAES $108,000SPRING WHEAT BREEDING AND GENETICS TALBERT $80,000WINTER WHEAT BREEDING AND GENETICS BRUCKNER $80,000IDENTIFYING AND DEVELOPING IMPROVED BARLEY VARIETIES FOR MONTANA BLAKE $55,000\nWHEAT STEM SAWFLY PARASITOID REDISTRIBUTION AND MONITORING BY COUNTY EXT. WEAVER $40,900\nMINING FOR MARKERS TO BE USED IN MARKER-ASSISTED BREEDING SHERMAN $40,000IMPROVED QUALITY OF MONTANA HARD RED AND HARD WHITE WHEATS NASH $33,000IDENTIFICATION OF RESISTANCE TO THE ORANGE WHEAT BLOSSOM MIDGE STOUGAARD $21,913QUANTIFYING AMMONIA LOSSES ON SURFACE APP. OF UREA TO NO-TILL WHEAT ENGEL $20,600\nSUSCEP. OF MT CEREAL CROPS TO WHEAT STREAK MOSAIC VIRUS & STEM RUST TRIALS BURROWS $20,000\nENHANCED FIELD SELECTION FOR WHEAT STEM SAWFLY RESISTANCE BRUCKNER $20,000DISTRIBUTION AND SEVERITY OF ROOT DISEASES IN MONTANA 'S WHEAT DYER $18,524COMPARING INPUT STRATEGIES FOR DIVERSIFIED DRYLAND CROPPING SYSTEMS MILLER $14,482EARLY GENERATION DURUM SELECTION AND GERMPLASM IMPROVEMENT ECKHOFF $10,000GENETIC MAPPING OF THE NEW RUST RESISTANCE GENES HUANG $7,500IMPACT OF PPO GENES ON ASIAN NOODLE QUALITY/AGRONOMIC TRAITS IN HRW MARTIN $7,000SAWFLY AND WIREWORM DEMONSTRATION PLOTS IN BARLEY AND WHEAT WANNER $5,495WHEAT PEST CALENDAR BURROWS $4,000\"MONTANA AG LIVE\" UNDERWRITING RIESSELMAN $3,500AG APPRECIATION WEEKEND JACOBSEN $3,000\nMARKET DEVELOPMENT \n34% 1,023,106\nU.S. WHEAT ASSOCIATES \nMEMBERSHIP 458,600\nSPECIAL PROJECTS INCLUDING TRADE TEAM ACTIVITIES 20,000OFFICER TRAVEL 7,600\nTRADE REPRESENTATION 10,000\nMONTANA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE - STATE GRAIN LAB\nREPLACE/UPGRADE EQUIPMENT, GRADING STATIONS & ADD RECEPTION/CONFERENCE AREA 90,7972009 WINTER WHEAT SAMPLE COLLECTION 4,000\nWHEAT FOODS COUNCIL \nMEMBERSHIP 60,600\nU.S. GRAINS COUNCIL \nMEMBERSHIP 60,000\nSPECIAL PROJECTS INCLUDING TRADE TEAM ACTIVITIES 25,000OFFICER TRAVEL 8,100\nWHEAT MARKETING CENTER \nGENERAL OPERATING SUPPORT 41,700\nMONTANA WHEAT EXPORT TOUR & WHEAT QUALITY PRODUCER WORKSHOP 12,000EQUIPMENT REQUEST - BAGEL DIVIDER/FORMER 17,000\nNORTHERN CROPS INSTITUTE \nGENERAL OPERATING SUPPORT 40,000\nSPECIAL PROJECT - DUAL PURPOSE FLOUR MILL (SWING MILL) 100,000\nNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WHEAT GROWERS \nENCOURAGE INVESTMENT AND INNOVATION IN US WHEAT 30,000\nNORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY \nHARD RED SPRING AND DURUM QUALITY SURVEY 10,550SAMPLE COLLECTION 5,000\nPLAINS GRAINS INC \nHRW WHEAT QUALITY SURVEY 13,159\nNATIONAL BARLEY FOODS COUNCIL\nMEMBERSHIP 5,000\nWHEAT QUALITY COUNCIL\nWHEAT QUALITY AND ENHANCEMENT 4,000\nEDUCATION AND INFORMATION \n6% 186,159\nNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WHEAT GROWERS \nENERGY, ENVIRONMENT & CONSERVATION ACTIVITIES 30,000PUBLIC PROMOTION & COLLABORATION 16,000\nTHE HAND THAT FEEDS U.S. 5,000\nNATIONAL BARLEY GROWERS ASSOCIATION \nCOMMITTEE ACTIVITIES 17,898\nWORLD TRADE RESEARCH AND INFORMATION 7,000\nMONTANA WHEAT & BARLEY COMMITTEE \nMW & BC MARKET NEWS SERVICE 3,000 MONTANA WHEAT & BARLEY COMMITTEE FY 2010 BUDGET pg. 2\nEDUCATION AND INFORMATION, continued\nPENDING RFP \n WHEAT PEST EDUCATION AND INFORMATION $15,000\nAGRICULTURE IN MONTANA SCHOOLS \nTEACHERS' WORKSHOP 3,000\nAGRICULTURE PROMOTION/WINDOW CLINGS 2,000\nMONTANA AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS SERVICE\nWHEAT AND BARLEY VARIETIES 20,000\nBARLEY SOLD FOR MALT 6,000\nMONTANA WHEAT UTILIZATION 3,000\nMONTANA AG STATISTICS BULLETIN 2,000\nETHANOL PRODUCERS AND CONSUMERS \nCONFERENCE SUPPORT 3,500\n\"TRADER'S DISPATCH\" NEWSPAPER\nMONTHLY MW & BC NEWS 4,500\nU.S. WHEAT ASSOCIATES ANNUAL REPORT INSERTION 1,900\nWOMEN INVOLVED IN FARM ECONOMICS \nMONTANA PROMOTIONAL ACTIVITIES 5,000\nMONTANA FARMERS UNION \"GRAIN PESTS AND DISEASE FIELD DAY\" 10,000\nMONTANA FUTURE FARMERS OF AMERICA FOUNDATION\nGENERAL SUPPORT 4,000\nMILLING AND BAKING CONTEST (PENDING RFP'S)\nMILLING AND BAKING CONTEST 1,000\nMONTANA 4-H FOUNDATION \nSMALL GRAIN PRODUCT SCHOLARSHIPS 1,500\nCASCADE COUNTY EXTENSION SERVICE\nSTATE FAIR WHOLE WHEAT-AND-BARLEY-A-THON PIE CONTEST 850\nMONTANA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE \nYOUNG AG COUPLES CONFERENCE 2,500\nCENTRAL MONTANA FAIR \nMILLING AND BAKING CONTEST 600\nCUSTER COUNTY CONSERVATION DISTRICT\nMONTANA RANGE DAYS COMMITTEE 498\n\"FARM FAIR\" 4,195\nYOUNG AG LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE 10,000\nGLASGOW AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND AGRICULTURE\nNEW TRENDS IN AGRICULTURE SEMINAR 3,000\nTHE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NORTHEAST MONTANA\nFROM GRAINS TO TRAINS EXHIBIT 3,218\nTRANSPORTATION\n6% 171,500\nWHITESIDE & ASSOCIATES/ALLIANCE FOR RAIL COMPETITION\nFREIGHT TRAFFIC EXPERT AND FOR REPRESENTATION 65,000ALLIANCE FOR RAIL COMPETITION REPRESENTATION 30,000ALLIANCE FOR RAIL COMPETITION MEMBERSHIP 10,000\nNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WHEAT GROWERS \nCOMPETITIVE TRANSPORTATION 30,000\nMONTANA AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS SERVICE \nGRAIN MOVEMENT REPORT 24,000\nMONTANA GRAINS FOUNDATION \nALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PILOT PROGRAM ARBITRATION POOL 12,500\nOPERATIONS\n22% 649,553\nEMPLOYEE SALARIES AND BENEFITS 306,241\nTRAVEL 90,000\nCENTRALIZED SERVICES 82,812\nMISCELLANEOUS CONTRACTED SERVICES 25,000\nMISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES 34,000\nSUPPLIES AND MATERIALS 27,000\nRENT 25,000\nCOMMUNICATIONS 14,000\nCOMMITTEE PER DIEM 10,000\nREPAIR AND MAINTENANCE 6,200\nPROMOTIONAL PROJECTS 13,800\nOFFICE CONSTRUCTION 5,500\nMWBC OVA & DOMESTIC SURVEY SAMPLE PLANTING 10,000\nTOTAL FY 2010 BUDGET $2,984,872\nM:\\\\ADD\\WBC\\WB_COMMOM\\BUDGETS\\BUDGETS\\Budget2010GALLATIN VALLEY AGRICULTURE COMMITTEE\nMONTANA FARM BUREAU FEDERATION"
} |
[
-0.05002346634864807,
-0.046001456677913666,
-0.008758405223488808,
0.09413573890924454,
0.02338257059454918,
0.09103387594223022,
-0.00685114786028862,
-0.03948753699660301,
-0.0463298074901104,
0.022516237571835518,
0.008265507407486439,
0.17070165276527405,
-0.048415202647447586,
-0.11426573246717453,
-0.0710238367319107,
0.004932071082293987,
0.03438931703567505,
-0.007232252508401871,
0.014732064679265022,
0.0014179195277392864,
0.05884880572557449,
0.07546161860227585,
-0.04798942431807518,
0.00462740333750844,
0.04275960847735405,
0.052271436899900436,
-0.03297093138098717,
-0.051441773772239685,
-0.05643628537654877,
-0.0031644010450690985,
-0.019788691774010658,
0.005064664874225855,
0.03283558785915375,
0.008170961402356625,
0.11247922480106354,
0.016692491248250008,
0.10598642379045486,
0.05850126966834068,
0.05257173627614975,
-0.05221261456608772,
-0.04628701135516167,
-0.01400380115956068,
-0.049431681632995605,
0.03468048945069313,
-0.05356379225850105,
0.01511604618281126,
-0.005314586218446493,
-0.043415237218141556,
0.0013161653187125921,
0.06328226625919342,
0.020270157605409622,
-0.06459008902311325,
0.0897718146443367,
0.06714217364788055,
0.023381894454360008,
0.05765122175216675,
0.010339138098061085,
-0.03692978248000145,
-0.03998873382806778,
0.08956532925367355,
-0.08274337649345398,
-0.06660173088312149,
-0.04396588355302811,
0.0398208424448967,
0.06460415571928024,
0.022916721180081367,
-0.09902292490005493,
-0.07367721945047379,
-0.029877621680498123,
-0.06355205178260803,
-0.02198011614382267,
0.004734582733362913,
-0.0906744971871376,
-0.019214225932955742,
0.07838284969329834,
-0.028522668406367302,
0.04423219710588455,
0.0914653018116951,
0.1393081247806549,
-0.06568644195795059,
0.0122267110273242,
0.012429963797330856,
-0.02206731028854847,
-0.013445936143398285,
-0.05388154461979866,
0.03498658537864685,
-0.01337262149900198,
0.028638901188969612,
0.11280771344900131,
-0.02897811122238636,
0.03902239724993706,
-0.023790042847394943,
-0.017063912004232407,
-0.035456761717796326,
-0.005240678787231445,
-0.0612637922167778,
-0.0019485888769850135,
0.014252841472625732,
0.03536899760365486,
0.041220471262931824,
-0.03364419564604759,
-0.010489814914762974,
0.00499919056892395,
-0.08585042506456375,
-0.07308739423751831,
-0.08796468377113342,
-0.006385773420333862,
0.04834157973527908,
-0.01393046136945486,
-0.00565206678584218,
0.010982529260218143,
-0.010455409064888954,
-0.01846904493868351,
0.07820646464824677,
-0.01177702471613884,
-0.019536612555384636,
-0.002736674388870597,
0.008205365389585495,
0.017868906259536743,
0.011614980176091194,
-0.019945235922932625,
0.042086683213710785,
-0.13657145202159882,
-0.06749506294727325,
-0.033690791577100754,
-0.10170648247003555,
-0.08970215171575546,
4.749520639650142e-33,
0.005311652552336454,
0.019112156704068184,
0.007349200081080198,
-0.007812454830855131,
0.06418732553720474,
-0.06604571640491486,
0.061195723712444305,
-0.05737537145614624,
0.03329085558652878,
-0.0016040069749578834,
-0.04499019682407379,
0.09125436842441559,
0.06578824669122696,
0.015373164787888527,
-0.027798745781183243,
-0.02593919262290001,
-0.09469564259052277,
0.09858989715576172,
-0.008581768721342087,
0.02491050586104393,
0.04966700077056885,
-0.02150382101535797,
0.023896416649222374,
-0.006504952907562256,
-0.01459236815571785,
0.0320659838616848,
-0.058643996715545654,
-0.020553292706608772,
0.03751040995121002,
0.02014392428100109,
0.014172131195664406,
-0.013952027074992657,
0.029024291783571243,
-0.024160420522093773,
0.030145015567541122,
0.004822458140552044,
0.027212129905819893,
0.0009059932781383395,
-0.025859884917736053,
-0.04729119688272476,
0.025444602593779564,
0.04352877661585808,
0.10885396599769592,
0.028036005795001984,
0.022064577788114548,
-0.01896096020936966,
0.02096519060432911,
0.048458829522132874,
0.0900399312376976,
0.07721132785081863,
-0.057832472026348114,
0.026901554316282272,
0.02724301815032959,
-0.06755863130092621,
-0.04016263410449028,
-0.03049006126821041,
-0.02620144560933113,
0.013611325062811375,
-0.025859687477350235,
-0.03927779197692871,
-0.034729935228824615,
0.12633472681045532,
-0.0036485441960394382,
0.02863503247499466,
-0.09846559911966324,
0.008166653104126453,
-0.09841783344745636,
0.021356558427214622,
0.09573403745889664,
-0.011731241829693317,
0.04581193998456001,
-0.0443151593208313,
-0.03027201257646084,
-0.008660971187055111,
0.0225744117051363,
0.014027473516762257,
0.01082625612616539,
-0.0008770377608016133,
0.011328822001814842,
-0.08871432393789291,
-0.01742241159081459,
-0.02817942388355732,
0.03136717155575752,
-0.05379023775458336,
0.15510989725589752,
0.021125879138708115,
0.03465697914361954,
0.007837229408323765,
0.07493718713521957,
-0.002048285212367773,
-0.0031863227486610413,
-0.024828623980283737,
-0.01577828824520111,
0.0583689883351326,
0.00041027250699698925,
-6.688607671900941e-33,
-0.007357294671237469,
-0.006051706150174141,
-0.032924193888902664,
-0.01933153346180916,
0.03177245706319809,
0.006238618865609169,
0.08428138494491577,
-0.05962156131863594,
0.032532744109630585,
-0.10442348569631577,
-0.03591945394873619,
-0.009444169700145721,
-0.03245370462536812,
0.07824676483869553,
-0.06840869039297104,
-0.08468389511108398,
-0.023093294352293015,
-0.003258455079048872,
0.03715435415506363,
-0.04158581420779228,
0.031607381999492645,
-0.007733045611530542,
0.021021956577897072,
0.09643907845020294,
0.013676735572516918,
-0.04794074967503548,
0.011837365105748177,
-0.0025325005408376455,
0.05709296464920044,
0.03694397583603859,
-0.04400130361318588,
-0.06946974992752075,
-0.030313484370708466,
0.161464661359787,
-0.02039097435772419,
-0.0486610010266304,
0.022297071292996407,
0.017075497657060623,
-0.03731466457247734,
0.06518850475549698,
0.0830836370587349,
-0.07035044580698013,
-0.06899817287921906,
0.07233062386512756,
-0.03071587346494198,
-0.010218187235295773,
0.0010586122516542673,
0.016740642488002777,
-0.061472337692976,
0.05138237401843071,
-0.025831133127212524,
-0.026746472343802452,
0.020734773948788643,
0.001458053127862513,
-0.0020322457421571016,
0.04000839963555336,
0.0968184545636177,
-0.017152808606624603,
-0.03957045078277588,
0.048952776938676834,
-0.005589805077761412,
0.07768175005912781,
-0.028766512870788574,
0.03011247329413891,
0.09503987431526184,
-0.0980963185429573,
-0.001068130019120872,
-0.025169087573885918,
0.0000110877690531197,
-0.021085452288389206,
0.028884410858154297,
-0.041776131838560104,
-0.04056673124432564,
-0.07883954793214798,
0.0432768240571022,
0.043828465044498444,
0.01845446787774563,
0.017503421753644943,
-0.10299373418092728,
0.12027920037508011,
-0.009276458993554115,
0.00838408526033163,
-0.005001984536647797,
0.057572778314352036,
0.04127447307109833,
0.07557309418916702,
-0.0048178029246628284,
-0.005440914072096348,
-0.06489768624305725,
0.04712126404047012,
-0.03903583809733391,
-0.0282114427536726,
0.040756724774837494,
0.020615672692656517,
-0.054394904524087906,
-6.780303607456517e-8,
0.025578513741493225,
-0.037817101925611496,
-0.014113311655819416,
-0.017249751836061478,
0.0792466476559639,
-0.11496493965387344,
0.03754068538546562,
-0.04048259183764458,
-0.01907835341989994,
0.034224968403577805,
0.0387178398668766,
0.0035835355520248413,
-0.0026056794449687004,
-0.04827713966369629,
0.04304379224777222,
0.0009644203237257898,
-0.03334931656718254,
0.007726464886218309,
-0.08567260950803757,
-0.05073227360844612,
-0.006799493916332722,
-0.025525152683258057,
-0.02376118116080761,
0.029940208420157433,
0.0096795205026865,
0.06252201646566391,
-0.00023033071192912757,
0.06780537962913513,
-0.027744369581341743,
0.03349994122982025,
-0.042258720844984055,
0.04462416470050812,
-0.013469403609633446,
-0.07946120947599411,
0.0064234426245093346,
-0.061655305325984955,
-0.05309609696269035,
0.006505988538265228,
0.0914488360285759,
-0.005864495411515236,
-0.07364799082279205,
0.003342859447002411,
0.028462698683142662,
-0.02078564278781414,
0.06222899630665779,
0.009618000127375126,
-0.10858912765979767,
0.026647739112377167,
0.06285496056079865,
-0.0613313764333725,
-0.07096794992685318,
-0.05155079811811447,
0.020231259986758232,
-0.06306049227714539,
0.00587038230150938,
-0.0323324091732502,
-0.0006911443779245019,
-0.12633948028087616,
-0.05884405970573425,
-0.037780147045850754,
0.05392878130078316,
0.002040647203102708,
0.04887370392680168,
0.018600283190608025
] | {
"pdf_file": "SZYITDQYKPK6FN4ZP4NZB5QTKLZFT326.pdf",
"text": "“BACK TO WORK: THE ADMINISTRATION’S \nPLAN FOR ECONOMIC RECOVERY AND THE \nWORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT” \nHEARING\nBEFORE THE \nCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND \nTHE WORKFORCE \nHOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES\nONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS\nFIRST SESSION\nHEARING HELD IN WASHINGTON, DC, FEBRUARY 12, 2003 \nSerial No. 108-1 \nPrinted for the use of the Committee on Education \nand the Workforce\n87-720 pdf \nFor sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office \nInternet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800 \nFAX: (202) 512-2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-0001 ii\nCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE \nJOHN A. BOEHNER, Ohio , Chairman \nTHOMAS E. PETRI, Wisconsin GEORGE MILLER, California \nCASS BALLENGER, North Carolina DALE E. KILDEE, Michigan \nPETER HOEKSTRA, Michigan MAJOR R. OWENS, New York \nHOWARD P. “BUCK” McKEON, California DONALD M. PAYNE, New Jersey \nMICHAEL N. CASTLE, Delaware ROBERT E. ANDREWS, New Jersey \nSAM JOHNSON, Texas LYNN C. WOOLSEY, California \nJAMES C. GREENWOOD, Pennsylvania RUBE ѳN HINOJOSA, Texas \nCHARLIE NORWOOD, Georgia CAROLYN McCARTHY, New York FRED UPTON, Michigan JOHN F. TIERNEY, Massachusetts \nVERNON J. EHLERS, Michigan RON KIND, Wisconsin \nJIM DeMINT, South Carolina DENNIS J. KUCINICH, Ohio \nJOHNNY ISAKSON, Georgia DAVID WU, Oregon \nJUDY BIGGERT, Illinois RUSH D. HOLT, New Jersey \nTODD RUSSELL PLATTS, Pennsylvania SUSAN A. DAVIS, California PATRICK J. TIBERI, Ohio BETTY McCOLLUM, Minnesota \nRIC KELLER, Florida DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois \nTOM OSBORNE, Nebraska ED CASE, Hawaii \nJOE WILSON, South Carolina RAU ѳL M. GRIJALVA, Arizona \nTOM COLE, Oklahoma DENISE L. MAJETTE, Georgia \nJON C. PORTER, Nevada CHRIS VAN HOLLEN, Maryland JOHN KLINE, Minnesota TIMOTHY J. RYAN, Ohio \nJOHN R. CARTER, Texas \nMARILYN N. MUSGRAVE, Colorado \nMARSHA BLACKBURN, Tennessee \nPHIL GINGREY, Georgia \nMAX BURNS, Georgia \n Paula Nowakowski, Chief of Staff \n John Lawrence ,Minority Staff Director iii\nTable of Contents \nOPENING STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN JOHN BOEHNER, COMMITTEE ON \nEDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE..................................................................................... 2 \nOPENING STATEMENT OF RANKING MEMBER GEORGE MILLER, COMMITTEE ON \nEDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE..................................................................................... 4 \nSTATEMENT OF ELAINE L. CHAO, SECRETARY OF LABOR, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF \nLABOR, WASHINGTON, D.C. .................................................................................................... 6 \nSTATEMENT OF KENNETH MAYFIELD, PRESIDENT, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF \nCOUNTIES, WASHINGTON, D.C............................................................................................. 34 \nSTATEMENT OF DR. LAWRENCE MISHEL, PRESIDENT, ECONOMIC POLICY \nINSTITUTE, WASHINGTON, D.C. ........................................................................................... 36 \nAPPENDIX A - WRITTEN OPENING STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN JOHN BOEHNER, \nCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE................................................... 49 \nAPPENDIX B - STATEMENT OF ELAINE L. CHAO, SECRETARY OF LABOR, U.S. \nDEPARTMENT OF LABOR, WASHINGTON, D.C. ................................................................ 53 \nAPPENDIX C - STATEMENT OF KENNETH MAYFIELD, PRESIDENT, NATIONAL \nASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES, WASHINGTON, D.C. .......................................................... 67 \nAPPENDIX D - STATEMENT OF DR. LAWRENCE MISHEL, PRESIDENT, ECONOMIC \nPOLICY INSTITUTE, WASHINGTON, D.C............................................................................. 79 \nAPPENDIX E – SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD, STATEMENT OF CONGRESSMAN \nDENNIS KUCINICH, COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE............ 107 \nAPPENDIX F – SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD, STATEMENT OF CONGRESSWOMAN \nDENISE MAJETTE, 4TH DISTRICT OF GEORGIA, U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES\n............................................................................................................................... ..................... 111 \nAPPENDIX G – SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD, STATEMENT OF JOSEPH R. LARSON, \nCHAIRMAN, RESTORING AMERICA, LLC, IBERIA, MO ................................................. 115 \nAPPENDIX H – SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD, STATEMENT OF MINNESOTA STATE \nSENATOR, MICHELE BACHMAN, DISTRICT 52, ST. PAUL, MN .................................... 123 \nAPPENDIX I – SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD, STATEMENT OF KIMBLE AINSLIE, \nON BEHALF OF THE MACKINAC CENTER FOR PUBLIC POLICY, MIDLAND, MI..... 129 iv\nAPPENDIX J – SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD, STATEMENT OF MAPLE RIVER \nEDUCATION COALITION, MICHAEL J. CHAPMAN, BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ST. \nPAUL, MN....................................................................................................................... ........... 135 \nTable of Indexes............................................................................................................... ........... 144 1\nHEARING ON “BACK TO WORK: THE ADMINISTRATION'S PLAN \nFOR ECONOMIC RECOVERY AND THE WORKFORCE INVESTMENT ACT” \n____________________\nWednesday, February 12, 2003 \nU.S. House of Representatives \nCommittee on Education and the Workforce \nWashington, D.C. \n The Committee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:30 a.m., in Room 2175, Rayburn House \nOffice Building, Hon. John Boehner, Chairman of the Committee, presiding. \n Present: Representatives Boehner, Ballenger, Hoekstra, McKeon, Johnson, Ehlers, DeMint, \nIsakson, Platts, Osborne, Wilson, Porter, Kline, Musgrave, Gingrey, Miller, Kildee, Owens, Payne, Andrews, Woolsey, Tierney, Sanchez, Kucinich, Holt, Davis, Case, Grijalva, Majette, Van Hollen, and Ryan. \n Staff present: Stephanie Milburn, Professional Staff Member; Travis McCoy, Legislative \nAssistant; Sally Lovejoy, Director of Education and Human Resources Policy; Krisann Pearce, Deputy Director of Education and Human Resources Policy; Whitney Rhoades, Professional Staff Member; Ed Gilroy, Director of Workforce Policy; Molly Salmi, Deputy Director of Workforce Policy; Christine Roth, Workforce Policy Counsel; Jo-Marie St. Martin, General Counsel; Kevin Frank, Professional Staff Member; Dave Schnittger, Communications Director; Kevin Smith, Senior Communications Counselor; Brady Newby, Communications Specialist; Deborah L. Samantar, Committee Clerk/Intern Coordinator. \nJohn Lawrence, Minority Staff Director; Mark Zuckerman, Minority General Counsel; Cheryl \nJohnson, Minority Counsel; Michele Varnhagen, Minority Labor Counsel/Coordinator; Peter Rutledge, Minority Senior Legislative Associate/Labor; Maria Cuprill, Minority Legislative 2\nAssociate/Labor; Alex Nock, Minority Legislative Associate/Education; Dan Rawlins, Minority \nStaff Assistant/Labor; Daniel Weiss, Special Assistant to the Ranking Member. \nChairman Boehner . The Committee on Education and the Workforce will come to order. \n We're meeting today to hear testimony on “Back to Work: the Administration's Plan for \nEconomic Recovery and the Workforce Investment Act.” Under Committee rule 12(b), opening statements are limited to the Chairman or Ranking Minority Member of the Committee. Therefore, if other Members have statements, they will be included in the hearing record. \n And with that, I ask unanimous consent for the hearing record to remain open for 14 days to \nallow Members' statements and other extraneous material referenced during the hearing to be submitted for the official record. Without objection, so ordered. \nOPENING STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN JOHN BOEHNER, COMMITTEE \nON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE \n Let me start this morning by welcoming our distinguished guest today, the Secretary of \nLabor, Elaine Chao, and I also would like to welcome my counterpart, the gentleman from California, Mr. Miller, and the other Members of our Committee. \n During his State of the Union address, President Bush laid out a comprehensive plan to \nspeed our economic recovery and promote long-term job growth and investment. His plan also provides specific assistance, in the form of personal re-employment accounts, to help unemployed Americans who are struggling to return to work. \n At a time when the economy is struggling but also improving, it is important that we focus \non giving the unemployed more flexibility and choices in their employment search. And even though the most recent Labor Department statistics reveal that unemployment is down to 5.7 percent this month, we still need to examine new ways to help working families across this country during the time when they need it most. \n On January 29th, Congressmen Jon Porter, Buck McKeon, Todd Tiahrt, and others \nintroduced the Back to Work Incentive Act, which reflects the President's plan to create these accounts, and aid unemployed workers who need the most help in getting back to work. I am pleased to be a co-sponsor of this important measure. \n The Back to Work Incentive Act represents a new and innovative approach to helping the \nunemployed get back on their feet. As President Bush has said, one worker out of work is one too many, and his plan will help working families in times when they need it most. \n Now, workers can use the Back to Work accounts for a variety of services to help them find \na good job, including job training, child care, transportation, housing assistance, and other expenses in helping find a new job. Recipients will be able to keep the balance of their $3,000 back to work 3\naccount as a cash re-employment bonus if they become re-employed within 13 weeks, creating an \nimportant incentive to return to work quickly. The more quickly a job is obtained, the larger the re-employment bonus will be. \nStates such as Iowa, Pennsylvania, and Washington have experimented with personal re-\nemployment accounts, and the results have been very positive. \n One of the exciting aspects of the new Back to Work accounts is that they empower \nindividual recipients to make choices appropriate for their own circumstances. Recipients will be able to create re-employment plans that help them navigate all the options available -- such as career counseling or training for a new profession in which they can be employed. By providing choice and flexibility, we can get people back into a steady, good-paying job as quickly as possible. \nThis new benefit supplements and enhances the services that are already available for those \nwho are most likely to face obstacles in finding and keeping new employment. These Back to Work accounts will not only provide the unemployed with another important benefit in helping them find a new job, but will be efficiently administered through the easily accessible One Stop Career Center system, established through the Federal Workforce Investment Act (WIA). \n The Workforce Investment Act (WIA) and the one-stop delivery system it created represent \nthe nation's primary investment in workforce development. WIA assistance is vital to helping workers find new or better jobs in this time of economic recovery. Through the one-stop delivery system, job seekers have access to labor market information, job counseling, and job training to help them get back on their feet. In addition, they have access to numerous other federal programs that provide services to job seekers. These Back to Work accounts will be an important new benefit that will be offered seamlessly and efficiently through the WIA delivery system. \n The 21st Century Competitiveness Subcommittee, chaired by Congressman Buck McKeon, \nwill lead this Committee's efforts to reauthori ze the Workforce Investment Act this year, and will \nfocus on improving the system to help achieve the original vision of the law when it was enacted in 1998, which was to create a seamless workforce development system for workers and employers. \n While we expect to move the Back to Work Incentive Act as a stand-alone bill, we also \nexpect to address the President's proposal as part of our efforts to reauthorize WIA. Particularly during a sluggish economy, WIA programs can play a role in helping Americans get back to work, or retain for new jobs. \n I look forward to working with President Bush, Subcommittee Chairman McKeon, \nCongressman Porter, Secretary Chao, and my friends on the Democrat side of the aisle to move this proposal quickly and make this innovative plan a reality for working families who need the help the most, and certainly they need it quickly. \n I now yield to my friend and Ranking Member of the Committee, George Miller. 4\nWRITTEN OPENING STATEMENT OF CHAIRMAN JOHN BOEHNER, \nCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE – SEE APPENDIX A \nOPENING STATEMENT OF RANKING MEMBER GEORGE MILLER, \nCOMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE \nThank you, Mr. Chairman. Madame Secretary, welcome back to the Committee. We look \nforward to hearing your comments today regarding the President's proposal for personal re-\nemployment accounts. The question we will have, obviously, is whether or not this proposal meets \nthe demands that are being placed on unemployed workers today in our current economy. \n This proposal comes at a time when working families are facing a weak economy, wracked \nby job insecurity, unemployment, corporate malfeasance, and battered retirement savings. By almost any measure you can think of, for wages, job security, retirement security, middle-class Americans are worse off today than they were two years ago, or at any time in the past decade. \n It's not a question of whether we have one unemployed worker in this country, which would \nbe too many for the President; we have 8 million unemployed workers in this country. And minority and women workers have been particularly hard hit. More than 1 million workers, 1 million individuals, many heads of households, have exhausted their federal unemployment benefits and cannot find work. The number of workers unemployed for more than 15 weeks has increased almost 140 percent in the two years since you took office. \n The paycheck for America's most vulnerable workers, those making the minimum wage, \nwill soon be at its lowest value since the Eisenhower administration a half a century ago. And yet we have seen absolutely no leadership from the majority in this Congress or from the Bush Administration to provide these men and women with a decent increase in their earnings. \n For some reason, this Administration and the Republican Congress can see fit to give $2 \ntrillion in tax breaks to the wealthiest Americans during this recession, and during a time of impending war, but we can't give 75 cents an hour to the poorest workers in this nation this year. \n The precipitous drop in the stock market over the past two years has cost employees over \n$175 billion in 401(k) investments and assets. Thousands of these employees who lost hundreds of millions of dollars of irreplaceable life savings and retirement benefits due to corporate fraud and abuse, are still awaiting help from the Department of Labor to recoup their losses more than a year later. \n Corporate pension plans' under-funding have reached a staggering level of $300 billion. \nThis requires that the Department of Labor immediately address the serious problem that threatens the retirement security of tens of millions of Americans. The public Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, the agency that 44 million Americans rely on to pay their pensions if their companies are bankrupt, has record deficits close to $10 billion when accounting for future liabilities, and huge corporations are lining up to dump their pension burdens into this corporation every month as part of their bankruptcy bail-out plans. Most recently we see Bethlehem National, and the question 5\nis how soon will the airlines off-load their employees' pensions into the Pension Benefit Guaranty \nCorporation? This threat to the employees' pensions doe s not even take into c onsideration the threat \nto their health insurance benefits that are also under attack. \n Not only is the federal treasury facing $300 billion in red ink next year and $2 trillion over \nthe next decade as a result of the administration's irresponsible fiscal policies, but now state and local governments are confronting $85 billion in deficits, forcing cuts in health care, child care, education, and training, and tomorrow this Congress will add $11 billion to the burden of those states with the passage of the Welfare Reform Bill. \n The American public is starting to understand that this Administration and this Congress \nhave turned a deaf ear to the worsening economic security of millions of Americans worried about their jobs, their families, and their retirement security. There is no additional help for more than 1 million workers who have exhausted their federal unemployment benefits and can't find work. There is no support for a modest increase in the minimum wage. There is vigorous opposition to the rights of working people to join unions, as demonstrated in the cases of the Department of Homeland Security and the baggage handlers and others at our airports. \n Failures by the Department of Labor over the last 15 months, since the beginning of the \ninvestigation of Enron, to try and recover hundreds of millions of dollars in retirement investments lost due to corporate fraud and abuse, the promotion of unsound and unfair pension changes, like the cash balance conversions that could impoverish millions of middle-aged and older employees, and the investment advice proposal that former SEC Chairman Arthur Levitt says violates the one bedrock principle of investing. \n Given this record, I am at a loss to see how the Bush Administration's proposal for re-\nemployment accounts speaks to the deep underlying problems facing working men and women in \nthis dreadful economy. How will these accounts help the 1 million workers who have already exhausted their federal extended benefits? How will they help workers find jobs in communities where no work is available? And how will this Department respond to the report by the previous Bush Administration that concluded that these accounts do very little for workers who are living in areas of moderate or high unemployment, of whic h there are now millions of Americans that share \nthat burden. \n I am eager to hear your testimony today, Madame Secretary, but I must say that I am very \nconcerned about this Administration's lack of attention to the welfare and the well-being of millions of middle-class working families who still see their livelihoods and their retirements threatened by this economy and by the inability of this Administration to respond to their needs. Simply cutting off people's benefits and not giving them additional work is not going to provide the kind of economic recovery that this nation needs and this nation's families want so dearly. Thank you very much.\nChairman Boehner . Before I introduce the Secretary, let me take a moment to welcome the \nnewest member of our Committee, Phil Gingrey, of Georgia. 6\nDr. Gingrey was elected to our Committee last night. He is an OB/GYN, a former Marietta \nschool board member, and most recently served in the Georgia State Senate from 1998 until he was elected to Congress this November. He will serve on the Subcommittee on Select Education and the Subcommittee on 21st Century Competitiveness. I want to welcome Dr. Gingrey to the Committee. \n It's now my pleasure to introduce the Secretary of Labor, Elaine Chao. Secretary Chao is \nthe nation's 24th Secretary of Labor, and is a champion of the nation's contemporary workforce. She has worked to focus the Labor Department on the modern realities of workers' lives. \n Prior to assuming the position of Secretary, she was a director of the Peace Corps, and later \nPresident and Chief Executive Officer of United Way of America. Secretary Chao's previous government experience includes Deputy Secretary at the U.S. Department of Transportation. \n In addition, her business experience includes positions at Bank of America, Capital Markets \nGroup, and Citicorp. And prior to her nomination as Secretary, she was a distinguished Fellow at the Heritage Foundation. Secretary Chao received her MBA from the Harvard Business School and her undergraduate degree in economics from Mount Holyoke College. \n Before the Secretary begins her testimony, I want to remind all the Members that we will \nimpose a five-minute limit on questions. The Secretary is only with us for a short time today, and she must excuse herself at noon. So I would ask Members to be mindful of the clock. \n And with that, Madame Secretary, welcome and you may begin. \nSTATEMENT OF ELAINE L. CHAO, SECRETARY OF LABOR, U.S. \nDEPARTMENT OF LABOR, WASHINGTON, D.C.\n Good morning, Mr. Chairman, Congressman Miller, and Members of the Committee. \nThank you for the opportunity to testify on the provisions of the President's economic growth and jobs package that will help workers with immediate benefits and long-term opportunities. \n I want to commend you and the Members of this Committee for your leadership in \nintroducing the Back to Work Incentive Act, H.R. 444, which would establish personal re-employment accounts for an estimated 1.2 million workers. \n I would also like to describe some of the innovative changes we proposed to the workforce \ninvestment system through reauthorization of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998. I will summarize my statement, Mr. Chairman, but ask that my prepared statement be included for the record.\n Last month, President Bush announced a comprehensive growth and jobs package to \nstimulate spending, promote investment, create jobs, and deliver critical help to unemployed 7\nworkers. If enacted, his plan will help create 1.4 million jobs by the end of 2004. \n I think we all agree that current unemployment rates, while low by historical standards, are \nstill too high. Our goal is to preserve the hard-won gains the economy has made, to speed up growth and create more jobs in both the short term and the long term. \n One of the unique features of the President's economic recovery plan is its new approach to \naddressing current unemployment through personal re-employment accounts. These are worker-managed accounts of up to $3,000, and they can be used to purchase a variety of re-employment services, including training, counseling, childcare, and transportation. \n Re-employment accounts will empower individuals by giving them more flexibility, \npersonal choice, and control over their job search. These accounts also have a re-employment bonus. Workers who find a new job within 13 weeks will be able to keep the cash balance in their personal re-employment accounts to assist them in transitioning back to work. \n These personal re-employment accounts will be administered by the states through the local \nOne-Stop Career Centers. And the President's proposal would provide $3.6 billion in additional resources to the states to fund these personal re-employment accounts over two years so that there will be no duplicative infrastructure that will be needed. \n As we entered the 21st century, our nation's workforce faced three major challenges: \nglobalization, technological advances, and demographic changes. So we need long-term strategies, as well, to prepare workers for good-paying jobs in the labor market. \n This Committee has already recognized the importance of these challenges through its hard \nwork on the Workforce Investment Act of 1998. Our goal is to continue to develop the One-Stop \nCareer Center delivery system into a cohesive workforce investment system that responds quickly and effectively to the changing needs of our population and our economy. \n The Administration's proposal for the Workforce Investment Act reauthorization would be \nbased on five key principles. We want to one, strengthen the governing structure of the workforce investment system by streamlining the membership and mission of state and local workforce investment boards. Two, we want to support a more comprehensive operation with available services through the One-Stop Career Centers. Three, we want to improve adult services by consolidating adult dislocated workers and employment services funding streams into one network. This will increase customer accessibility, as well as state flexibility in responding to local economic conditions. Fourth, we want to better serve at-risk youths by targeting resources to out-of-school youths in both urban and rural areas. And fifth, we want to ensure greater accountability by focusing on the most important outcomes, and eliminating burdensome and duplicative requirements at the state and the local levels. All federal job-training programs will be measured by the same performance standards. \n The President's proposals recognize that investments in the workforce are a key part of \neconomic growth. I believe that these proposals are key to ensuring that our nation's workforce 8\nremains the most highly skilled and competitive in the world. I look forward to working with you, \nMr. Chairman, and this Committee as we move forward. \nSTATEMENT OF ELAINE L. CHAO, SECRETARY OF LABOR, U.S. \nDEPARTMENT OF LABOR, WASHINGTON, D.C. – SEE APPENDIX B \nChairman Boehner . Madame Secretary, thank you for your testimony, and thank you for your \nwillingness to come and speak with all of us today. \n Some are saying that the re-employment bonus that we're talking about in the Back to Work \naccounts encourages individuals to take the first available job, instead of waiting for the best job. In your testimony that you submitted, you refute this argument by citing evidence from pilot programs showing individuals generally found comparable jobs. Plus someone who chooses to take the job bonus funds obviously has that money and can use it for their own family needs. \n Is it true that for some individuals labor market attachment can help them advance, \nsuggesting that it's important to become re-employed quickly? \nSecretary Chao . We believe so. Now, let me just refer to the pilot programs that you mention. \nIndeed, our results from the pilot program show that they are helpful in getting people back to work. We had five pilot programs in four states, and they worked out very well. \n On the bonus issue, it's not as if a person can get a bonus right away. Basically, they will \nreceive 60 percent of the bonus upon getting a job, then 40 percent if they stay on the job for six \nmonths.\n We don't believe that workers would just take the first job that they find, and that's what the \nwhole beauty of the personal re-employment account is. It will give them more choice to select the kind of training that is currently not available within the One-Stop Career Centers. So there is a great deal of investment by the individual in the kind of training they want in order to get the job that they want. So we feel that the re-empl oyment account is actually an incentive to get better \ntraining.\nChairman Boehner . How would the states and the local One-Stops choose which employees \nwould be eligible for these Back to Work accounts? \nSecretary Chao . We want to help those who are most at-risk and who have been the harder to \nplace. There will be an ongoing effort with the states to come up with certain criteria that will target at-risk and hard-to-place workers, those who are about to exhaust their extended unemployment benefits, and also those who are working in industries that are obviously impacted by trade, or have a difficult time. \nChairman Boehner . We have heard from businesses that incumbent or current worker training is \ncritical for both lay-off aversion and for businesses to remain competitive. However, many small 9\nbusinesses do not have the capability to train their employees, or to retrain them. \n Will the Administration's WIA reauthorization proposal increase opportunities to provide \nincumbent worker training? \nSecretary Chao . We have a wonderful workforce investment system that the American taxpayers \nhave invested approximately $12 billion a year in. It offers counseling, job placement services, skills assessment, resume writing, and workshops. For workers who are currently employed and are thinking about other opportunities, these services are available to them, as well. And for workers who are currently out of work, or who may have exhausted their unemployment insurance benefits, they too can avail themselves of core services at these One-Stop Career Centers. \nChairman Boehner . Consolidating the adult dislocated workers and the unemployment services \nfunds could simplify what is now a complicated administrative structure and allow more flexibility to address local circumstances. How do you envision this combined funding system? How do you envision that this will improve services to workers and to businesses? \nSecretary Chao . The combined funding is a plus-plus for the state and local entities. Our \ndepartment receives a lot of requests for waivers because one stream of funding has expired and the needs still exist. That is a timely process. \n We want the state and local entities to be able to have more discretion and flexibility with \nwhich to tap different funds to meet local conditions in order to help local people in their communities. This increased flexibility will enable them to do that. \nChairman Boehner . Mr. Miller? \nMr. Miller . Thank you. Madame Secretary, has the money for this program been identified yet in \nthe budget? \nSecretary Chao . Legislation has to be passed first, and then there will be appropriate monies and \nfunding that will go along with it. \nMr. Miller . So that would be when? \nSecretary Chao . Well, as soon as you are able to pass this bill. \nMr. Miller . Do you envision that in this budget year? \nSecretary Chao . This will be fully funded. Yes, we certainly hope so, because there are people \nwaiting for this money. \nMr. Miller . But the President's budget doesn't make any room for this. \nSecretary Chao . It will have to be some kind of a supplemental. 10\nMr. Miller . Okay. So we can envision seeing that $3.6 billion in a supplemental at some point? \nSecretary Chao . Yes, it will be discrete and above the $12 billion that we currently fund the \nworkforce investment system with. \nMr. Miller . As I understand this, we will use the existing profiling system in all states to try and \nidentify those people who are most likely to exhaust their benefits.\nSecretary Chao . Yes. \nMr. Miller . And then they would be selected. \nSecretary Chao . We will work in conjunction with the states on defining what these criteria will \nbe. But the principle and the goal are to target these harder-to-place workers, and to help them. \nMr. Miller . Now, it's my understanding that there is no real correlation between the so-called \nprofiling score and those individuals at risk for long-term unemployment. It really hasn't delivered a high level of reliability in terms of the people that it has identified. What actually happens to those individuals, and certainly not in high unemployment areas? Several evaluations have been done and it's not a one-to-one correlation. \nSecretary Chao . We have a very good idea through the workforce investment system. \nMr. Miller . But that's not what the evaluations say. \nSecretary Chao . Well, the evaluations will be looking at workers who are about to exhaust their \nunemployment insurance benefits. And again, we need to flesh this out more in conjunction with \nthe states. It would be looking at workers who are about to exhaust their extended unemployment insurance benefits, because there have been two extensions of unemployment insurance benefits already. \nMr. Miller . I don't understand then. When is the worker selected and identified to take advantage \nof this program? They come in, they have lost their job, and they file for unemployment. \nSecretary Chao . Right. \nMr. Miller . Are they identified at that stage? \nSecretary Chao . No, this will be separate although there is the capability to do that. The U.S. \nDepartment of Labor would work with the state and local boards. \nMr. Miller . No, I understand that, but do I have to be in high likelihood of exhausting my benefits? \nSecretary Chao . No, you can use the workforce investment system if you are. 11\nMr. Miller . I understand that. When does this $3,000 come into play? Is it the end of my term of \nunemployment? \nSecretary Chao . No, it comes right at the beginning. If you are qualified you will be notified. \nMr. Miller . Pre-screened, profiled? \nSecretary Chao . You will be notified. Then you come in and you can get the $3,000. \nMr. Miller . If I take the $3,000, and if I get a job, I can put the rest of the money into my account, \nand I can use that for whatever purposes I want, right? \nSecretary Chao . There will, of course, be accountability measurements. \nMr. Miller . Right, I understand, I understand. We will assume everybody here is honest for a \nminute. \n If I exhaust the $3,000, can I come back and take advantage of other unemployment \nprograms? \nSecretary Chao . If you exhaust the $3,000, you can come back and use core services, but not the \nintensive services. Core services that are available within the One-Stop Career Centers are for example; resume writing services, other workshops, or counseling. \nMr. Miller . So if the $3,000 doesn't work out then, I am precluded from the intensive training \nprograms. \nSecretary Chao . Yes, because the rationale there is that you would have bought other services \nelsewhere.\nMr. Miller . But if it doesn't work out, and I still don't have a job, and I'm trying to feed my family, \nthen I'm done. \nSecretary Chao . No, you can come back and use the workforce investment systems’ core services. \nThere are still core services available. You can use the counselors, workshops, resume-writing services, work with the computers, do all that. That is still available. \nMr. Miller . Alongside all the other people who still can't find work. \nSecretary Chao . It's interesting, but in this economy, 40 percent of workers find a new job within \nsix to seven weeks. Our economy is churning constantly. \nMr. Miller . Yes, except the number of people who are unemployed for longer periods of time \ncontinues to expand. 12\nSecretary Chao . And we're concerned about them, which is why we want to offer this re-\nemployment service. \nMr. Miller . Let me ask you this. Since the profiling really doesn't have that kind of correlation, or \nthat kind of reliability, why aren't you helping people who we already know have exhausted their benefits? \nSecretary Chao . People who have exhausted their current benefits have had two extensions so far, \nso they have had their normal unemployment insurance benefits of 26 weeks, an extension of 13 weeks, and an additional extension up to May. \nMr. Miller . Yes. \nSecretary Chao . So that's more than a year of unemployment insurance benefits. \nMr. Miller . So what's your theory, that that's enough for them? Excuse me; these people are \nwithout a job, Madame Secretary. It's not whether they have 26 weeks or 13 weeks of unemployment. \nSecretary Chao . What I'm saying is that we have a workforce investment system that they can \naccess. There is still help available. And in fact, these services of finding a new job are still there. They are available to everyone and anyone who wants to find a new job. \nMr. Miller . But let me just finish here, Mr. Chairman. As I understand the presentation of this \nprogram, this is a belief that this option, which sounds in many ways very positive, is best for those people who are most likely to exhaust their unemployment benefits, and we have a pool of one \nmillion people who have already exhausted their unemployment benefits. Why aren't we offering \nthis to those people who are desperately in need of what this program offers to try to get them back on their feet and able to provide for their families? \nSecretary Chao . Well, within one of the provisions of this bill, which you are about to consider, it \ndoes go back and pick up people who have exhausted their unemployment insurance within the last three months, prior to enactment. \nMr. Miller . I understand that. But if this bill becomes law in September, anybody who has \nexhausted their benefits before June is out of the pool? \nSecretary Chao . They can still access the $12 billion of workforce investment core services. \nMr. Miller . Yes, they have been doing that for 26 weeks, and they haven't found a job. I \nunderstand, you know. \nSecretary Chao . Well, it's 26 weeks, plus 13 weeks, plus another five months. \nMr. Miller . Most people are very diligent about trying to get back into the workforce. 13\nChairman Boehner . The gentleman's time has expired. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from \nTexas, Mr. Johnson. \nMr. Johnson . Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you, Secretary Chao. I would like you to \ncontinue to explain what you were just trying to explain when you were cut off; 26 weeks is not the end of the road. Would you like to comment on that more fully? \nSecretary Chao . The President had an economic package in 2002. It was called the Job Security \nProgram, and among its many provisions was an extension of an additional 13 weeks of unemployment insurance benefits. And on January 8th of this year, he asked for and received another extension to May of this year for unemployment insurance. So it's 26 weeks, plus 13 weeks, and then another segment from December 28th of 2002 to May of 2003. \nMr. Johnson . You got it. Nobody is left out in the cold. And in my visits with some of the local \nworkforce boards, in Texas at least, they're doing a great job. \n You state in your testimony that streamlined local boards would be able to focus more on \nstrategic planning and policy development activities. Could you expand on what the Department's vision is for local boards, and how that planning will improve the delivery of services? \nSecretary Chao . Yes, thank you. Our goal is to make these services easily accessible and usable \nby the client. And so we hope to work with the workforce investment boards at both the state and local levels so that there would be greater clar ification of the mission with the aim of streamlining \nthe governing structure so that the clients will find it easier to use the many services that are available in the system. \nMr. Johnson . And do you get good cooperation with the local authorities around the country? \nSecretary Chao . Some more so than others. But it's a great system, and it offers tremendous \nresources.\nMr. Johnson . No complaints from Texas, I hope. \nSecretary Chao . No. \nMr. Johnson . You suggest improving upon individual training accounts by making them more \nflexible and responsive to individual needs. Could you elaborate on the changes necessary to accomplish that goal? \nSecretary Chao . Right now, the workforce investment system offers an array of training programs \nthrough a list of pre-approved providers. It's kind of like an HMO. If you want training, you have to go to one of these pre-approved contractors for training. And if they do not offer a training program that you want, you have to settle for something less than what you had wanted. \n The whole goal of the personal re-employment accounts is to allow the individual to find \nthe training program that he or she wants. Because we find that a number of major entities in 14\nworkforce training, for example the community colleges, do not participate in the Workforce \nInvestment Act system because of overly burdensome requirements. For a whole host of reasons, the community colleges, and vocational education schools have opted out of the training system and therefore many training programs are not available. \n The personal re-employment accounts empower the individual, and give them a choice so \nthat if they find a course that they like, even if it's not from a pre-approved provider within the workforce investment system, they can go and purchase the training that they want with that $3,000 to get the job that they want. \nMr. Johnson . Yes, that's great. You have also proposed creating youth challenge grants that \nwould be used, I guess, to support activities in a non-school setting that lead to high academic achievement. \n Could you provide examples of such activities, and would the grants be available to address \nthe needs of in-school youth? \nSecretary Chao . Absolutely. We have a great deal of concern with giving young people hope and \ninspiration and a view for the future. And so these kinds of programs keep them on the right path, set them up with good counseling and people that they can consider mentors, and hopefully they will be on the path to getting better jobs and greater fulfillment. \nMr. Johnson . And become great Americans. \nSecretary Chao . Yes. \nMr. Johnson . Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. \nChairman Boehner . Before I introduce the gentleman from Michigan, let me take a moment to \ncongratulate our colleague from Texas, Sam Johnson, who, 30 years ago today, was released from prison camp in Vietnam. Sam served our country for 29 years in the Air Force, and it included some seven years as a prisoner of war. Thank you. \n[Applause.]\nMr. Johnson . Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and all of you. You know, we have the greatest nation in \nthe world, and I would go back and do it again tomorrow, if I needed to. Thanks again. \nChairman Boehner . Mr. Kildee you are recognized for five minutes. \nMr. Kildee . I yield to Ms. Sanchez. \nChairman Boehner . The gentlelady from California is recognized for five minutes. 15\nMs. Sanchez . Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Good morning, Madame Secretary. Thank you for \ncoming over and talking to us, in particular, about a new concept with respect to these personal accounts. I have a question for you.\nMr. Miller was talking about the fact that we don't do a very good job of profiling who is \nreally going to be on unemployment longer, or out of a job longer than we thought, or maybe people that we thought were going to be out of a job get it real fast. Do you know what the statistics are on our ability to really guess ahead of time what the opportunities are for people who are unemployed? \nSecretary Chao . I don't have that information, but I can get it for you. \nMs. Sanchez . Okay. I would like to see that information, please. \nSecretary Chao . Basically in the past year alone, we have invested $71 billion in unemployment \ninsurance.\nMs. Sanchez . Yes. The reason I ask is because I have been here as we have been extending the \nunemployment benefits for families, including a very desperate situation many of my families \nfound themselves in on December 28th, a couple of days after Christmas, when the leadership of this House failed to get an agreement on passing a new extension. \n And so I was happy to see that we worked on that, and hopefully we will get another \nextension, because a lot of workers are out of work. And I think they are out of work not necessarily because they don't have the skills or training, but because we are not creating the jobs in this economy. \n In fact, I was over the other day at my One-Stop, and I ran into a gentleman who has been \nunemployed for a year. He used to have a manufacturing job. That factory moved; the production is now done in China. He told me he has exhausted his unemployment benefits, he is using the core benefits, but he has no extension of benefits, and he has no financial stability in his family, because he has not been able to find a job. \n Does this Administration plan on putting forward another extension if, in fact, we still have \nsuch high unemployment going on in our country in the next few months? \nSecretary Chao . I think it's important to note that while we all want to help people who are having \na hard time out of a job, the best thing for them is to help them find a job. \n And you are absolutely right, job creation is important. And that's why this President has \nfocused a great deal on economic issues and on job creation. That's why we had the economic job security program of 2002. \n The President has fought corporate fraud and abuse by asking for the passage of the \nCorporate Accountability Act. The President has also signed off on the Terrorism Assurance Act, 16\nwhich will create about 360,000 jobs by the Teamsters' own account. \n We have asked for passage of the energy bill, which will also provide for increased job \ncreation. And the President's economic growth package, as announced last month, will spark an environment through which new jobs can be created, and that includes helping small businesses, which is the engine of growth in our economy. \nMs. Sanchez . Madame Secretary, just because I only have a limited amount of time, with all due \nrespect, in 2001+ there were 1.7 million jobs lost in this economy. And just this past January, the month that we have just passed, we have had announcements from major employers that they plan to eliminate over 132,000 jobs. Just in this past month that's what we're hearing. So the economic stimulus package we know now is not working. \nBut aside from that, we've got people who are out of work. What you are proposing is that, \nahead of time, when people come to unemployment they're going to be profiled, and all of a sudden it will be decided if they are going to get unemployment and get the special account. \n Isn't it true that if we're profiling them to be the hardest to place, are you telling me that \n$3,000 is the maximum that we now spend on hard-to-place people, or people who have problems getting a job, or who need extra training, or who have language barrier skills? Is $3,000 the maximum we ever spent on somebody who is one of those profiled? \nSecretary Chao . No, for TAA, in fact, it's a little bit higher than that. \nMs. Sanchez . So it costs more than that? \nSecretary Chao . The $3,000 is on top of everything else that has been already invested in a \nworker.\nMs. Sanchez . What happens is some people get out earlier, they find a job faster, et cetera, and so \nyou use the mean. And therefore, the people who are the hardest to place are actually the ones who are using more than $3,000 worth. \n What you are doing to these people is saying ahead of time, “we don't think we are going to \nbe able to help you find a job as fast as the mean of the group, or even the forward piece of the bell curve.” And so what would you say about the fact that you're only allowing $3,000 for the people who are actually the hardest to place? \nSecretary Chao . This is $3,000 on top of all the other services that are available to these \nindividuals. So this is again, if I can emphasize, on top of all the services that are available. \n The other thing that is worthwhile to mention is that we want to get these people back to \nwork as quickly as possible, because the workplace changes. So the goal should be to get these people back to work, by giving them the training to get back to work. 17\n And going back to your economic issue, again, you're absolutely right. This nation lost 1.7 \nmillion jobs in 2001, and it was because of the attacks of September 11th. The stock market peaked in March of 2000. The manufacturing sector began to decline in August of 2000. \n When this Administration entered office, we saw three quarters of negative growth. We \nwere just coming out of it when the attacks of September 11th occurred, in which approximately 1.7 million jobs were lost. And the average unemployment rate in the last decade was 5.7 percent, which is the unemployment rate of the last month. \nChairman Boehner . Thank you. \nMr. DeMint? \nMr. DeMint . Thank you, Mr. Chairman. \nMadame Secretary. I want to thank you, and congratulate the Administration on looking at \nthis problem in a different way, by maintaining the safety net for unemployed workers, and recognizing that skill development, wealth creation, and well-directed incentives are what we need to develop our workforce and help workers in this country. I believe the plan creates more choices for workers in their training, as you have outlined, and more competition between the services, which, again, I think will provide better training for workers. \n As you see this program being implemented, have you thought through how we're going to \ntrack it at the federal level to determine the success of making sure folks aren't falling through the cracks? How we will determine, six months out, whether or not this new program is really working? \nSecretary Chao . We have. We have one of the best workforce investment systems in the world, \nand we will use the infrastructure of the One-Stop Career Centers to help us track, and also monitor success.\n Our success is defined very simply. Number one, we want to place more people in good-\npaying jobs. And number two; we hope that more will be able to get off unemployment insurance, because they no longer need it, and that they will be able to get new jobs. \nMr. DeMint . Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I yield back. \nChairman Boehner . Thank you very much. \nMr. Case? \nMr. Case . Thank you, Mr. Chairman. \nMadame Secretary, I'm happy to hear of your alma mater, having spent a fair bit of time \nthere, although probably before your time there. 18\n I'm just trying to understand the math here. You have three figures basically, $3.6 billion \nproposed. You had a maximum of $3,000 intended to serve at least 1.2 million unemployed workers. The $3.6 billion, I think it says here, is in one year but intended to be spread over two years. Right? \nSecretary Chao . Right. \nMr. Case . Okay. And I assume that since the states are, as I understand it, under no restrictions \nwith the $3,000, they're going to max out, if they can. So the $3,000 is a given. Is that correct? The states can spend the $3,000? \nSecretary Chao . Yes, up to $3,000. \nMr. Case . Right. But why wouldn't they spend the $3,000? \nSecretary Chao . We would not imagine that they would not. \nMr. Case . Right, exactly. So is that how you got the math to get the states serving at least 1.2 \nmillion people? Because I think that's the math, 1.2 million X $3,000 = $3.6 billion. \nSecretary Chao . Right. \nMr. Case . Which came first, the $3.6 billion or the 1.2 million workers, or the $3,000? \nSecretary Chao . We were trying to find a number that would seem reasonable, and would offer \nsome impetus for people to look at this account in an attractive fashion. So it had to be a large \nenough number. \n And yet we also wanted it to be a responsible number, to be sufficient to respond to the \nneeds of the individual. So $3,000 is approximately the amount that is spent for workers who access the workforce investment system, on average. There will be those who will, of course, use less; there will be others who will use more. But that's about, on average, how that came out. \nMr. Case . So you started with the $3,000. \nSecretary Chao . Yes. \nMr. Case . So you say the accounts are targeted at those newly unemployed workers, eligible for at \nleast 20 weeks of UI. Do you estimate that figure at 1.2 million, or are there more than that amount that you're trying to serve? \nSecretary Chao . I'm less certain about that answer. I think that was a number that we thought \nwould be, again, a responsive number to try to respond to a more conservative estimate of the number of people who will be availing themselves of this funding. 19\nMr. Case . How many unemployed workers in our country right now? \nSecretary Chao . We have approximately 4 million. \nMr. Case . Four million? What would be the reason the President wouldn't propose this for all 4 \nmillion? \nSecretary Chao . I think for a number of reasons, primarily because all of them are currently able \nto access a $71 billion safety net program of unemployment insurance plus two extensions, plus the workforce investment system. So we, as a nation, invest about $71 billion in people who are out of work with unemployment insurance and with new training opportunities. \n These personal re-employment accounts are given to those we think would access this \nprogram. We don't think all of those who are unemployed would necessarily access this program, because some of them are short-term unemployed. As I mentioned, 40 percent of workers in a very dynamic economy find new employment within about 6 or 7 weeks and become re-employed. \n We had 52 million Americans last year, for example, who left their jobs either voluntarily \nor involuntarily. And we had 52 million Americans last year that found new jobs. So our economy is very vibrant, and it's churning all the time. The goal is to get people back to work at a job that they would like as quickly as possible, because otherwise, the workforce and the workplace just changes too rapidly. \nMr. Case . So you feel that the 2.8 million that you don't anticipate being covered by the proposal \nare not in need of this same attention, or there are other means to assist them. \nSecretary Chao . They will have other resources available to them. \nMr. Case . And what would happen for the people that become unemployed from this point \nforward, because we've got 4 million today. You’re anticipating that you are going to serve 1.2 million of them through this program and we anticipate, don't we, that other Americans will become unemployed over the next two years. \nSecretary Chao . Yes, but people will be going off the roles, as well. It's very dynamic. It's \nchanging; it's churning all the time. So there will be people going off, people coming on. And for people who qualify, this is a two-year program, they will have a year with which to use that money. \nMr. Case . Thank you, Madame Secretary. \nChairman Boehner . Thank you. \nMr. Osborne? \nMr. Osborne . Thank you for being here today Madame Secretary. 20\nI would just like to react briefly to a previous comment that the economic stimulus package \nwas not working. As you pointed out, we have had what some have called “the perfect storm” with 9/11, a downturn in the economy, Middle Eastern crisis, corporate scandals, and so on. According to Alan Greenspan, who I believe is reported to be somewhat unbiased and non-partisan, that had we not had the previous economic stimulus package, we would probably have a worse situation than we have today. \nSecretary Chao . Yes. \nMr. Osborne . I just thought I would like to comment on that, and I would like to commend you on \nthe job that you have done to this point under difficult circumstances. \n Also, I would like to mention that in the current proposed economic stimulus package that I \nbelieve the personal re-employment accounts are part of, we often hear it characterized as a tax break for the rich. These accounts, certainly, are not for the wealthy. This $3.6 billion goes directly to the states for people who most need it, and I think sometimes these types of arguments are overlooked in the whole process. \n I think this is a good idea. It certainly streamlines, as you have mentioned, the delivery \nservices through the states, there is no redundancy of delivery systems, and I think it provides a powerful incentive. \n I would like to digress briefly and just ask you a quick question. I am not totally familiar \nwith youth councils. I probably should be, but I am not, and I wondered if you could comment on what their function is, and how this relates to the overall package. \nSecretary Chao . Youth councils are a wonderful concept. When I was president of the United \nWay of America, I had worked very hard to elicit more cooperation and participation of young people in United Way activities. We wanted young people to participate. \n But under the Workforce Investment Act, which mandated the youth councils, it has not \nworked as well; they have been spotty. In some regions they have worked well, and in others they have not. \n So, as we go forward with the reauthorization of the Workforce Investment Act, we would \nlike to look at the youth councils and see whether they should be mandatory. If a local community wants to have a youth council, they certainly should have one. But if in other communities there is not the same interest, should the Federal Government direct and dictate that these local communities have youth councils? I think that's a valuable discussion that we want to have. \nMr. Osborne . Thank you. Mr. Chairman, I yield back. \nChairman Boehner . Thank you. \nMr. Payne? 21\nMr. Payne . Thank you very much. \nMs. Secretary, it's good to see you. Certainly this is a new concept. I wish I had more of an \nopportunity to read it. It kind of came at us suddenly. But I wonder, there was some talk about profiling the recipients, and I wonder what goes into profiling an individual to assess them, and what type of assessment? \n And secondly, what kind of accountability system do we have to follow whether what is \nbeing prescribed is working? We know that currently there are actually 8-million unemployed. I think 4 million might have been mentioned, but the number is actually, from my statistics, about 8 million. \n As we look at the profile of the accountability, and it's a $3,000 one-shot, it's good to have \nnew money, but what about places where there is chronic unemployment, or the more difficult to place person, or an area that is really more economically devastated than another area; the level one shot, one amount, $3 million period per area. It seems that there is less emphasis on various regions of the country, and age groups of people, and problems that they may have. \n So I just wonder how do we deal with those who will have a more difficult time, or a region \nthat has a more difficult situation? \nSecretary Chao . Well, first of all, I hate to use the word “profiling,” but basically when new \nclaimants come and file for unemployment insurance, they are assigned a counselor. They come into a One-Stop Career Center, or they call, or they go to the website. It's a very welcoming environment. It is not intimidating. We work very hard to make sure that that's the case. \nThey come and with assistance they fill out a kind of a profile of what they do and how \nlong they have been out of work; we already have that information, but it's an update, as well. And our initial contact with the various experts in the unemployment insurance system indicate that this process works well, in terms of giving us a good idea as to who needs what services. \n So, there is an extensive process by which people are received into the unemployment \ninsurance and workforce investment system. And then based on where they're likely to live, where they are working, whether it's for a particular company that might be impacted by trade, or whatever, all of this is taken into account. \n The issue about harder to place, long-term unemployed is an issue that we are all concerned \nabout. But that's what the whole system of unemployment insurance benefits and the workforce investment system address as well. \n We will, of course, want to help with transitional assistance, but the larger issue is how do \nwe train them so that they can get back into the workforce, and then how do we make the economic conditions such that there will be new job creation. \n So I think we are in agreement. We want to help these hard-to-place individuals. And I \nhave confidence that the workforce investment system in which we have invested so much time 22\nand resources is up to the task of finding these individuals and helping them with their training and \njob opportunities. It will give them added flexibility, because right now, the One-Stop Career Centers may not offer training courses that are available to a long-term displaced person. But if they are able to purchase the training course that they want, which is not currently available in the one-stop career center, I believe that's a win-win for the individual, and for us who care about the person, as well. \nMr. Payne . Thank you very much. The accountability part is something that I am really concerned \nabout.\nSecretary Chao . We're concerned with accountability as well. I liked what Mr. Miller said, in that \nI think most people try to be honest, and we will go forward on that. But even so, if that is not the case, we do have the infrastructure. This is not a new program that is bereft of any infrastructure.We are distributing and deploying this new funding stream through the workforce investment system. So there are counselors, there are current and existing performance standards that can be tapped to watch over the disbursement and usage of funds, as well. \nMr. Payne . Thank you very much. \nChairman Boehner . Thank you. \nMr. Wilson? \nMr. Wilson . Thank you, Mr. Chairman. \nMadame Secretary, I want to thank you for being here today. It's a great honor to be with \nyou. I appreciate your public sector service and private sector service, particularly as President of \nUnited Way of America, and as a distinguished fellow with the Heritage Foundation. That means a lot to me, and I appreciate what you have done. \n I also want to give you a first-hand report. In my service in Congress, I have had the \nopportunity to visit the One-Stop Career Centers in Columbia, South Carolina, which is an urban area, and also in Hampton County, South Carolina, which is very rural and disadvantaged. And it's just extraordinary, the opportunities that it provides to citizens. The equipment is just top-notch; people can come in and prepare resumes, and they can find jobs in their communities. \n The directors have done a phenomenal job of recruiting career counselors. And they are \njust like cheerleaders. When the people come in, they are not victims. They are wonderfully treated like sports heroes, welcomed with enthusiasm, and given the respect they deserve. It has really worked in our state, particularly with welfare reform and has success in helping people get jobs and employment. \n In line with that, in your statement, you suggest that the mandatory One-Stop partners \nshould have a stronger role on the state boards to ensure their investment in and commitment to the integrated service delivery system. Could you please elaborate on how to provide the partner 23\nprograms with additional incentives to participate in the system? \nSecretary Chao . I think it's very important for the WIB boards to really encompass the full array \nof stakeholders within their community. And because we want these clients, dislocated workers, to come in and get new jobs, we have to envelope more participation of employers, many of whom are businesses. \n In the past, there may have been some hesitation in fully addressing relevant training \nopportunities. We want people to get relevant training, so they can get real live jobs. That entails understanding what employers and businesses want in their workforce skills requirements, and working with them to make sure that when we ask people to invest a year or two years of their time in new training opportunities, that they will be rewarded with the job that they want. So that means working with the employers more closely. \nMr. Wilson . Well, that's successfully helped people to have fulfilling lifestyles in our state, and I \nappreciate it. \n I have one final question. In your testimony, you state that the streamlined local boards \nwould be able to focus more on strategic planning, and policy development activities. Could you please expand on the Department's visions for the local boards, and how the strategic planning by local business-led boards will improve the delivery systems at the local level? \nSecretary Chao . Right now, the role of the state boards appears rather ambiguous. They are such \na wonderful resource, and there is more work that can be done. So we need to clarify and work with the local workforce investment boards, and the state workforce investment boards, so that they work together and we leverage all of our collective strengths to make sure that the person that \nwalks through the door in the One-Stop Career Center will get a job. \nMr. Wilson . Well, thank you for making a difference for the American worker. I yield the balance \nof my time. \nSecretary Chao . Thank you. \nChairman Boehner . Thank you. \nMs. Woolsey? \nMs. Woolsey . Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman, and thank you, Madame Secretary. I feel like \nthis is deja vu , because I remember the last time you were here. I believe the money we were \ntalking about was for health care for the unemployed, and it felt like we were spending the same money over and over and over and it was not going to be spread. \nSecretary Chao . That's not true. \nMs. Woolsey . Well, that's what I thought was happening. And I feel like the same thing is \nhappening. We're talking about $3.6 billion that will be spent or be a bonus, and then it will be 24\navailable for the people that come after. \n I mean, there is going to be a limit to this, and I think we have to be realistic that it's going \nto take more than $3.6 billion. I think we have to look at the fact that $3,000 seems like a lot of money. My profession was human resources training, counseling, interviewing, and the whole nine yards. Three thousand dollars will not cover an individual who is in an industry where there will be no rehiring, where the worker has to leave. \n For example, an engineer may decide, because there are no more jobs in that industry, to \nserve the community and, be better off for all of us, become an educator. Well, $3,000 isn't going to get that person there. If an autoworker needs to relocate, $3,000 is not going to relocate that family. And I just want to know if you really think $3,000 is going to go far, even though it's more than we have now, and it only starts with newly unemployed and we're leaving out those that are the real hard to employ, or else they would have jobs. \nSecretary Chao . I guess it's only in Washington that we look at $3.6 billion as chump change. I \nhad mentioned before that we have invested $71 billion in our unemployed dislocated workers, which also includes $12 billion that we have invested in the Workforce Investment Act. \n The recently passed Trade Adjustment Assistant Program adds another $17 billion in health \ncare. And for dislocated workers who are eligible for trade adjustment assistance, health care will be taken care of as well.\nMs. Woolsey . Well, Madame Secretary, if you could let me ask a question about chump change, a \n$2 billion tax break is for the wealthiest of the wealthy when we have all of these people that are unemployed. That is not chump change. \nSecretary Chao . Well, I wanted to disabuse the idea that somehow $3,000 is insufficient. It is on \ntop of the $71 billion that we already invest in people that we care about who are dislocated, as well as in the workforce investment system. So it's on top of what's already available, and on top of almost more than a year of benefits to those who are dislocated. \nMs. Woolsey . Well, let me ask you a question about speaking of “on top of.” Will the states be \nallowed to supplant their existing programs, or will this be supplementary? \nSecretary Chao . No, this will be on top of what the states receive. \nMs. Woolsey . And will we have it written, that they must use this as additional funding, and not \nuse it for what they were going to do already? \nSecretary Chao . I don't think that will be a problem. \nMs. Woolsey . Oh, it will be a problem. It must be clear. \nSecretary Chao . Well, this is additional funding for them, and we will work with the states. 25\nMs. Woolsey . Well, yes, it's additional. But they can then not do what they were going to do \nalready, and use that funding. \nSecretary Chao . Workforce Investment Act monies are already much decentralized. Basically, \nthey go to the states, and we will certainly work with them on that. \nMs. Woolsey . All right. Thank you very much. \nChairman Boehner . Thank you. \nMr. Porter, the author of the Personal Re-employment Accounts that we have before us. \nMr. Porter . Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thank you for the opportunity to be a part of this \nlegislation. To the Secretary, thank you for being here today. \n I come from one of the fastest-growing states, if not the fastest-growing state in the country, \nNevada. And after the 9/11 catastrophe, we experienced probably as large an impact on our workforce as anyone in the country. At one time we had close to 100,000 men, women and families out of work, so we are pleased to work with you on this legislation. \n Currently in Nevada, we have about 36,000 of our neighbors and friends that have \nexhausted their benefits, and of that about 19,000 will soon be losing their extended temporary benefits. This is a great start. It's a great start; it's a jump-start. \nIf I could, just for a moment, I’d like to put a real face on this situation. I know we talked a \nlot about numbers today, and we talked about billions, and we talked about policy, and it's obvious \nthat there are some opposed to this bill. But there is a young lady in Las Vegas that's a friend of \nmine that is a single mother with two children. She is currently unemployed, and she receives about $600 a month in unemployment benefits. So if we're to put a real face on this piece of legislation, this young woman now will have help with child and day care, so that she can get out and get a job. She will now have help with transportation, to make sure that she can get back to work.\n She wants to get back to work; she cannot survive on $600. It helps but it certainly is not \nenough. But this bill is a great jump-start for single moms, and moms and dads that are having challenges across the country. And yes, we could say it's not enough. Certainly we could always do more. But what a great start for this young woman in Las Vegas, Nevada, with two little kids that needs help, and needs it now. \n I expect of course, as a freshman, that there is going to be lots of discussion and lots of \ndebate. But I would encourage my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to think about this single mom in Las Vegas with two little kids that could use help today. I would encourage fast passage, because certainly it can be adjusted in the future. But I am excited about this for our communities and for our state. And thank you for being here and for your presentation. 26\nSecretary Chao . Mr. Chairman, thank you very much. I am really passionate about these Personal \nRe-employment Accounts. I think they are a good thing. They give people a lot of flexibility, a lot of choice. And we expand their array of choices. \n So I want to make the offer to Members on both sides of the aisle, if I have not been great at \nexplaining this, I apologize. I hope that if any of you want to learn more about it, I will be more than glad to have my staff come over and talk with you and assuage some of the concerns that people may have. It's a wonderful program. It will give people a great deal more choice and flexibility. \nChairman Boehner . Thank you. \nMr. Kildee? \nMr. Kildee . Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Will this be new money, or will it be money that will be \nreprogrammed? \nSecretary Chao . No, it will be new money. \nMr. Kildee . It will be new money. \nSecretary Chao . Yes. \nMr. Kildee . Well, if we're going to do this, I want to help you, and help the President to get that \nnew money. I will start off by helping get that new money by voting against his tax cut, so we will have some flexibility on that. Because if we give away another $650 billion, it's going to be very \ndifficult to find new money, there is no question. \nSecretary Chao . Well, if it were not for the tax cut, I think the recession would have been even \nworse.\nMr. Kildee . Okay. Well, we will see. But I will give him about $650 billion that he can find this \n$3.6 billion out of. I voted against the last tax cut, and I feel morally comfortable in that. \n Why is there no unemployment insurance extension in the Administration's budget? Secretary Chao . Unemployment insurance benefits have already been extended twice. The first \nextension was for 13 weeks, the second extension occurred on January 8th of this year, and it will last through May. So there are two extensions on top of the normal 26 weeks of unemployment insurance.\n The issue is not whether we want to extend unemployment insurance. We all want to help \npeople with transitional assistance. But the issu e is how do we get them back to work, because \npeople want to go back to work, and it's much better for them to receive a paycheck rather than an unemployment check. That's why we want to talk about the Workforce Investment Act, and find 27\nways to get people the training that they need to get the job that they want. \nMr. Kildee . Well, I am very much impressed with the Workforce Investment Act; we have a very \ngood One-Stop Center in Flint, and it works very, very well. I just visited it last week, again. \n But under the President's father, we did four extensions of unemployment. And the \nextension that we had in January did not provide any additional weeks of benefits to more than one million workers who had run out of benefits and were still unemployed. Those people are hanging out there still. And it seems to me that we should have some responsibility, if not concern, for those people. \nSecretary Chao . Well, we do. One concern is we want to get them back to work. I think we all \nagree on that. \nMr. Kildee . Yes. \nSecretary Chao . So the issue is not so much how many more extensions we can give, but how do \nwe get these people back to work. \n Secondly, we have this wonderful $12 billion workforce investment system, which is \navailable for people's use, and we want to encourage them to go into the One-Stop Career Centers, which are re-employment centers, so that they can have other opportunities to get training, or to find new jobs. \nMr. Kildee . You know, I get the most questions about when we’re going to extend unemployment \ncompensation, particularly for those more than 1 million who had run out in January and were not \nreinstated with that extension. When I go out to Genesee Valley Mall, which is the biggest mall in \nmy district, the entrepreneurs and managers keep asking, “When are you going to get this extension?” They were asking about it before January, now they're asking about it for those who did not get the extension. Because they know that the unemployment check, in itself, is a stimulus to the economy. If the workers of Flint don't have money, the mall can't sell. So that, in itself, is a great stimulus to the economy. \n I like the idea of job training, and WIA does a good job. I like the idea of counseling and \nthese various things, but in Flint, Michigan, we have almost completed the process of tearing down the Buick plant that my dad went to work for in 1916. He retired in 1950. \n Many of the people who are laid off in Flint are skilled workers. You have millwrights, you \nhave electricians, machine repair people. These are very skilled people. I was talking to an electrician the other day, and he is a very skilled electrician. \n So you ask yourself what type of job training do you provide for these people who have \ngone through apprenticeship programs, and they are still laid off? And these are the type of people, in many parts of the country, that are laid off. How will the job training particularly help them? They might get, I don't want to have to use McDonald's the entire time, some lesser-skilled 28\njob. How will it help them? \nSecretary Chao . Well, this is a tough question. And it's a larger demographic and societal issue, \nbecause it basically speaks to the fact that our workforce and our workplace are changing. We are in a globalized economy. As much as we would want to hold on to a majority of these jobs, we may not be able to. Our economy has transformed from a manufacturing into a service industry into an information-based industry. \n So this is of great concern. That's why we do want to place more emphasis on training. We \nalso have to foster an environment in which job creation will occur, and that's why the President's economic growth package for helping small businesses could be one solution. All of these factors need to work together. \nMr. Kildee . Thank you, Madame Secretary. Thank you very much. \nChairman Boehner . Thank you. \nMrs. Musgrave, no questions? Mr. Van Hollen. \nMr. Van Hollen . Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Madame Secretary, as a new Member, I appreciate \nyour being here. It's good to be here. \n I think we would all agree that the best way to address the job shortage in this country is to \nget the economy moving again. We have been talking a lot today as if the issue is a job-retraining \nproblem, but in fact, the current problem is largely the gap between the lack of demand for jobs, \nand the many people who are unemployed. I mean, isn't that right? \nSecretary Chao . I think retraining is a large part of that, because there is a skills gap in our \ncountry. And clearly, job creation is important. \nMr. Van Hollen . Right. Maybe you could update these figures for me. I understand that in \nNovember 2002, the Department of Labor statistics showed that there were 2.8 million job openings in the United States. In other words, 2.8 million employers were looking for 2.8 million employees. But at the same time, you had about 8 million people looking for work. Are those figures still approximately true today? \nSecretary Chao . Not exactly. \nMr. Van Hollen . Can you give the figures? \nSecretary Chao . I will give you the right figures. Basically, our economy is churning all the time. \nSo any number taken in its static version is not indicative. Fifty two million Americans left their jobs last year, either voluntarily or involuntarily, and 52 million Americans found new jobs. 29\n There is constant churning going on, and there is a skills gap, because there are employers \ntoday who are looking for workers, and they cannot find the workers with the requisite skills. So it's both parts, but I do agree with you, job creation is important. And that's why the President's economic growth program has gone into small businesses, and we have the Terrorism Insurance Bill.\nMr. Van Hollen . Right. What is the gap today? Do you have the figures for what the gap is today \nbetween the number of employers with jobs to fill, and how many people are looking for jobs? \nSecretary Chao . I can get that for you. You might think it's easy to get, but it's not because, our \neconomy is so vibrant. It's so dynamic; it's churning all the time. \nMr. Van Hollen . Right. \nSecretary Chao . But I will certainly try to get those figures. \nMr. Van Hollen . With respect to the economic growth plan that the President has put forward, one \nof my colleagues from the other side of the aisle mentioned that Alan Greenspan was considered a non-partisan, neutral party. Could you respond to his comments yesterday, which indicated I think to most people, that he did not think that the President's economic plan would, in fact, spur growth in the short term, and in fact, also concluded that it would drive up interest rates in the long term? Could you respond to that? \nSecretary Chao . Yes.\nMr. Van Hollen . Do you agree with Alan Greenspan? \nSecretary Chao . I don't know what he said yesterday. I'm not aware of what he said. But he has \nsaid things in the past about the overall exuberance of the stock market, which led to the over-capacity that faces our economy now. And business investment is slow, because of over-capacity. \nMr. Van Hollen . Right. \nSecretary Chao . And that was obviously a result of the over-indulgence of the stock market in the \nlast decade. \nMr. Van Hollen . Right. But do you agree with him that the large deficits in the out years would \nresult in increases in interest rates? \nSecretary Chao . I don't know what he said. \nMr. Van Hollen . Do you agree with that statement, that large increases in deficits will increase the \ninterest rates? \nSecretary Chao . No, there is another point of view on that, as you well know. 30\nMr. Van Hollen . Well, I was just interested in your personal point of view. \nSecretary Chao . Well, I don't think that's relevant. \nMr. Van Hollen . Okay. Can I ask you one local question, Secretary Chao? \nSecretary Chao . Yes, of course. \nMr. Van Hollen . This relates to the transit subsidy provided by the Federal Government. I think \neveryone in the audience knows that we face a severe congestion issue in this region. As someone who represents an area in suburban Maryland, I wondered if the Department of Labor had considered increasing the transit subsidy to the $100 a month level that is allowed by the Federal Government. \nSecretary Chao . We have. I'm glad you asked that question, because it's one that I have been \ntrying to put to certain employees of the Department of Labor. \n We, in fact, have increased the transit subsidy to everyone outside the one particular \nbargaining unit. And there seems to be the inability to come to any agreement with this very small bargaining unit. So we have given the transit subsidy to people outside the bargaining unit, and they have accepted. We have 17,500 employees, and the particular bargaining unit that we're talking about is less than 1,000 people. We're quite perplexed. \nMr. Van Hollen . Well, that's good to know. Is it $100 now? Have you gone to $100? \nSecretary Chao . I believe so, yes, but I can confirm that for you. \nMr. Van Hollen . Okay, thank you. \n Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Chairman Boehner . Thank you. Madame Secretary, I know you need to leave at 12:00. It looks \nto me like it's one minute to 12:00. \nMr. Andrews, can you ask questions in 30 seconds? \nMr. Andrews . I'm sure of it. \n Madame Secretary, welcome back. It's great to have you here. Secretary Chao . Thank you. \nMr. Andrews . I hope that you would convey to Senator McConnell our best wishes for his speedy \nrecovery. 31\nSecretary Chao . Thank you. \nMr. Andrews . I wanted to ask you about the funding available under this new idea, which is up to \n$3,000 per person. We have had some discussion this morning as to whether that is adequate. I think it probably isn't, in a lot of cases, but the point I want to get to is whether the $3,000 is really there.\nThis program allocates $3.6 billion for two fiscal years; that's the plan if it makes it into the \nbudget, which it hasn't yet. In the last two years, in 2001 and 2002, 7.3 million people exhausted their unemployment benefits. Now, if we had $3.6 billion for those 7.3 million people, each person would get a benefit of about $500, not $3,000. How much are people really going to get under this program? \nSecretary Chao . I'm sorry, I didn't answer this question in the past, and I think it does lead to some \nconfusion. Of the 8 million that are unemployed, from experience we only expect there to be about 50 percent who will access unemployment insurance. Not everyone does because, again, these numbers are very dynamic. So a person can be out of the workforce for a very short period of time. \nMr. Andrews . No, but the number I gave you are people who accessed unemployment benefits and \nexhausted their unemployment benefits. So these are people that were in the system. \nSecretary Chao . Okay, what was the question? I'm sorry. \nMr. Andrews . There are 7.3 million people who exhausted their benefits in the last two years. \nSecretary Chao . But this is not a stagnant pool. It's very dynamic. \nMr. Andrews . You think fewer people will exhaust their benefits in the next two years? \nSecretary Chao . We hope so, sure. \nMr. Andrews . Well, if it were half as many, you would have, if my math is right, $1,000 available \nper person, not $3,000. \nSecretary Chao . And the question is? \nMr. Andrews . My question is why should we conclude that there is $3,000 per person available \nwhen the numbers don't add up? $3.6 billion is wholly insufficient to cover the proposal that you're making. \nSecretary Chao . Well, it's $3.6 billion. \nMr. Andrews . Over two years, right? \nSecretary Chao . No, it's every year. 32\nMr. Andrews . Oh, every year. \nSecretary Chao . Yes, yes.\nMr. Andrews . Well, if it were $3.6 billion, it's $7.2 billion over two years. I think that would still \nonly offer $1,000 per person for people who exhausted their benefits. \nSecretary Chao . But not everybody will access it.\nMr. Andrews . But doesn't that mean that to get $3,000, two-thirds of the people who exhausted \ntheir benefits wouldn't get this program at all, right? \nSecretary Chao . Some of them may not access it; some of them will have other services that are \navailable to them. We expect that probably 1.2 million will access the program, and $3,000 is about average. \nMr. Andrews . I would not question for one moment the intention of the Secretary or the program, \nbut I think the Administration has its usual “loaves and fishes” problem here. It occurred when you came in and talked about unemployment benefit extensions and health benefits, and had insufficient dollars to cover the health benef its, which never really materialized, anyway, for \nanyone.\n And then it happened again in welfare reform, when the Administration was talking about \nchildcare money when there were too many recipients and not enough dollars. The Administration, with all due respect, has a penchant for spending the same money over and over and over again and making everyone the same promise. \n There is no way that even a majority of people who exhaust their unemployment benefits \nwould ever get anything close to a $3,000 allocation under this program. The money isn't there, unless I'm missing something. \nSecretary Chao . Mr. Andrews, with all due respect, I disagree. We already have, as I mentioned, \na $71 billion program to help dislocated workers. \nMr. Andrews . Which doesn’t include this, though? This is above and beyond that, right? \nSecretary Chao . You're right. And on top of that, we're adding $3.6 billion. \nMr. Andrews . Right. \nSecretary Chao . And on top of that, there is a TAA component that adds another $17 billion. \nMr. Andrews . I appreciate that. \nSecretary Chao . There is a wide array of services available. 33\nMr. Andrews . My concern is that my constituents, when they hear this proposal, are going to \nthink, “Great. I can get a $3,000 voucher where I can go out”, if we're allowed to use that word, “where I can go out and buy customized job training services, or get help with child care or transportation.” And the reality is the majority of them aren't. It's really a false premise. \nThe question I'm going to ask you and you can submit it for the record, what would it really \ncost to guarantee each person who exhausts his or her unemployment benefits a $3,000 voucher? What would that cost? And what's the difference between what you propose and what that number would be? \nSecretary Chao . I'm not particularly partial to assigning it any one title. But you do bring up an \nimportant point, and that is there are some training programs that are not available to the One-Stop Career Centers. And if a person wanted to access some new training programs in a community college, they can use that $3,000 and access the training program that they want to get the job that they want. \nI'm not quite sure I understand your question, but I will be more than glad to submit it for \nthe record, as requested. \n(NOTE: This item was not submitted prior to the official printing of the hearing transcript. \nHowever, the item will be maintained upon its submission and available for inspection in the Majority office of the Committee on Education and the Workforce.)\n Mr. Andrews . Very succinctly, my question is I don't know how you can do $8 billion worth of \ngood with $3.6 billion worth of money. \nSecretary Chao . It can be done because not everyone will access the funding, according to our \npast experience and historical records. \nChairman Boehner . Thank you very much. \nMr. Andrews . Well, I would again say that you have a “loaves and fishes” problem here. \nChairman Boehner . Those 30 seconds became 6 minutes, and I guess that's why we don't have an \nopportunity for everybody to ask questions. \n But thank you, again, Madame Secretary, we really appreciate you being here, and staying \nfor a few extra minutes with us. \nSecretary Chao . Thank you very much for the opportunity to be with you all. Thank you. \nChairman Boehner . Thank you. \n We will ask the second panel to come forward. As soon as they are ready, we will begin \nthe second panel. 34\nMr. McKeon . [Presiding]. We are happy to welcome our second panel here today. We have Mr. \nMayfield, a constituent of one of our Members. We would like to have Mr. Johnson introduce you at this time. \nMr. Johnson . Thank you, Mr. Chairman. \nI want to welcome Ken Mayfield, who has been a County Commissioner in Dallas County, \nwhich is, as you know, the center of the universe of course, being in Texas. He has recently become the President of the National Association of Counties. And in that prestigious job, I think, he is a welcome witness for this Committee. We welcome you, Ken, and thank you for being here. \nMr. McKeon . Thank you. Our second witness is Dr. Lawrence Mishel, President of the Economic \nPolicy Institute. His areas of expertise include income distribution and poverty, labor markets, wages, unions, and collective bargaining. Dr. Mishel earned his doctorate degree in economics from the University of Wisconsin. \n We appreciate both of you being here. You know the ground rules about five minutes and \nhow the lights work. \n We will hear first from Mr. Mayfiel d, and then Dr. Mishel. Commissioner? \nSTATEMENT OF KENNETH MAYFIELD, PRESIDENT, NATIONAL \nASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES, WASHINGTON, D.C.\nThank you, Mr. McKeon and Mr. Miller, and of course, my good friend Sam Johnson from \nTexas, and other distinguished Members of this Committee. My name is Ken Mayfield; I am the President of the National Association of Counties and a County Commissioner from Dallas County, Texas.\n I am deeply honored to have been asked to testify on H.R. 444 and to offer some comments \non the reauthorization of the Workforce Investment Act. Mr. Chairman, I would ask that my written testimony, which was provided to you earlier this week, be made part of the record. \n As you know, every county in America is involved in a local workforce program. We \nbelieve that these programs, as established under the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 have been responding to today's workforce crisis effectively and responsively. \n NACO shares your concern for the ongoing workforce crisis. Quite simply put, too many \npeople are unemployed, and we must help these people return to work as quickly as possible. The decision by this Committee to consider legislation that would enhance the existing workforce system is a vote of confidence in the system, and a vote of confidence that we share with you. \n NACO believes that H.R. 444 is a very important and innovative approach for our \nunemployment problems, and will enable workforce programs to address the problems of long- 35\nterm and structural unemployment. Therefore, we wish to offer our overall support for this bill, \nand we urge you to adopt it with some modification. \n We support the efforts to make personal re-employment accounts as part of the workforce \ndevelopment system, limit substantially the amount of funds that may be used at the state and local levels for administrative purposes, institute sufficient flexibility so that individuals may step outside the parameters established through individual training accounts and utilize different types of services and make these funds directly available to recipients. \n However, we believe that some modifications would be helpful, which include, number \none, each individual who receives a personal re-employment account should be required to establish a personal re-employment plan at the local One-Stop system office to which they are referred.\n Two, as a condition of receiving administrative dollars to operate this program, local \nworkforce investment areas should be required to amend their plans to reflect the kinds of services they will provide to individuals receiving personal re-employment accounts. \n And three, local workforce investment areas should be permitted to supplement PRA funds \nwith Workforce Investment Act funds to ensure their participants can purchase the types of training and employment assistance they need to achieve the outcomes expressed in their personal re-employment plan. \n Four, local One-Stop systems should be permitted to charge for any services that the local \nOne-Stop provides, other than the personal re-employment plan, the cost of which should be covered by administrative funds. \n Individuals who lose their jobs within the first year of employment, through no fault of their \nown, should be permitted to receive Workforce Investment Act intensive and training services. Funds appropriated for personal re-employment accounts should be in addition to those funds appropriated for other Workforce Investment Act activities. \n The Back to Work Incentive Act of 2003 should not become a vehicle by which to \nreauthorize the Workforce Investment Act, except as is necessary to establish this program, or to reform the Wagner-Peyser Act, the employment service, or the unemployment insurance system. \n We also urge you to clarify in your committee report that the term “local area” referenced in \nH.R. 444 is, in fact, a local workforce investment area, as designated under section 116 of the Workforce Investment Act, and that the One-Stop delivery system referenced in H.R. 444 is the same as the One-Stop delivery systems delineated in section 121 of the Act. \n I would also like to take this opportunity to outline for you some of our most significant \nconcerns regarding reauthorization of the Workforce Investment Act. We believe that the local public/private partnership, as established under the Workforce Investment Act, should be maintained. The federal/state/local relationship established by the Workforce Investment Act 36\nshould be maintained. \n Appointment authority for the local workforce investment boards must remain with chief \nlocal elected officials. Local One-Stop centers should remain under the guidance and jurisdiction of the local chief elected officials and local workforce investment boards as provided for in current law, and the percentage of private sector representatives of the local workforce investment boards should be increased in the number and percentage of public sector representatives, especially the mandatory partners, should be reduced substantially, or eliminated. \n In conclusion, the National Association of Counties believes strongly that workforce \ndevelopment programs represent an important tool for federal, state, and local governments to respond to the continuing employment crisis. \n While no workforce program can ensure that every American who wishes to work can \nwork, that can only be ensured by a robust economy with substantial job creation capability, we do believe that the current system is well positioned to address the needs of America's unemployed workers and businesses. \n We believe that the Back to Work Incentive Act, and the Workforce Investment Act, of \nwhich it will become a part, if enacted into law, represents important steps towards helping all Americans find work. We therefore welcome this proposal and endorse it, with the modifications recommended. \nSTATEMENT OF KENNETH MAYFIELD, PRESIDENT, NATIONAL \nASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES, WASHINGTON, D.C. – SEE APPENDIX C \nMr. McKeon . Thank you very much. \nDr. Mishel? \nSTATEMENT OF DR. LAWRENCE MISHEL, PRESIDENT, ECONOMIC \nPOLICY INSTITUTE, WASHINGTON, D.C. \nThank you very much, and I appreciate the Committee inviting me to testify on these very \nimportant issues. \n I am going to make three points today. One is that our labor market is troubled. There is, \nessentially, a jobs and income crisis, in my view. Two, the plan that President Bush has proposed will not be very effective at short-term job creation, and will actually destroy jobs in the long run. Three, personal re-employment accounts are far from the answer that the unemployed workers in \nour country need at this point. 37\n Let's turn to the labor market. As you know, the unemployment rate has risen almost two \npercentage points over the last two years, and we have lost more than 2 million jobs, 2 million private sector jobs, since unemployment started rising in October of 2000. \n We also know that household incomes fell in 2001, nearly across the board, and that in \n2002, when we have the numbers later this year, I'm sure we will see that household incomes have continued to fall, as I believe they probably are this month, as well. \n I wanted to point out two things that you may not know about the current labor market \nsituation. One is a reference to Graph 1 in the testimony, which shows what is the job loss in this recession compared to prior recessions, when you're 28 months into a recession. And you will note that this recession we have lost 1.8 percent of our private sector jobs after being in a recession 28 months. And this is a greater loss of jobs than even we had in the early 1990s, the early/mid-1980s recession, and the 1970s recession. \n A second thing I want to point out about the current labor market troubles is that this does \nnot only affect those who are unemployed, it also affects those who are employed, because we are now seeing that wages are falling behind inflation, which we now show on graph two. \n Graph 2 has two bars for each type of worker: low wage, middle wage, and high wage \nworkers. And you will see that in 2001, there is very strong wage growth, faster than inflation, across the board. But during 2002, we see that wages actually grew less than inflation for nearly every type of worker. \n This is very problematic, in my view, and calls for attention to how to create jobs and lower \nunemployment quickly, which brings me to the President's plan, which is labeled a jobs and growth \nplan, especially for the long term. \n I am also proud to share with you a statement that was signed this week by 10 Nobel Prize \nwinners, many prominent economists, and 450 economists in total that was released on Monday.And that statement noted that the tax cut plan proposed by President Bush is not the answer.However one views the specifics of the plan, there is wide agreement that its purpose is a permanent change in the tax structure, and not the creation of jobs and growth in the near term. The permanent dividend tax cut, in particular, is not credible as a short-term stimulus. \n But one need not listen to 10 Nobel Prize winners to know that one can actually look at the \nactual reports of the current Council of Economic Advisors to know that this is a failed plan. Their own analysis, which I show in Chart 3, shows that they claim that the plan will create 1.4 million jobs over the next two years, but that after five years, it only has created 700,000 jobs. That means, with simple mathematics, that over the last three years of this five-year period 233,000 jobs a year are lost. That means, in the long run, we're actually losing jobs. \n If you look at the projections of a standard forecaster, Mark Zandi of Economy.com\n, who \nthe Wall Street Journal just recently referred to as one of the smartest, brightest observers of the economic scene, he estimates that by the year 2013, we will have 750,000 fewer jobs than if the 38\nBush plan had never been legislated. There are many other forecasters who would agree. \n In the short run, there are some jobs, but it's a lot of money to spend, $674 billion, to create \nsome jobs in the next year or two, when all we need to do is to spend some money on some temporary tax and spending measures to create jobs. I might add that all of the plans offered by the Democrats in both the Senate and the House spend less money overall but spend more money up front and create a lot more jobs up front. \n Let me turn to the PRAs. My fear is that the personal re-employment accounts are more \nabout a sense that somehow the unemployed are not really looking hard enough for work and that we need to discipline them by giving them the motivation to get re-employment bonuses. All of the research that shows that they get re-employed shows that they get re-employed one week earlier. That's not really a magnificent achievement, in my view. What workers want most are jobs, then they would like income support if they don't have a job, and they would like training with income support if they are unemployed. \n As I have said, the President's plan does not really create jobs. We have heard today that \nthere is no offer of extended unemployment insurance benefits, and the training is actually worse under the personal re-employment accounts, than I think under the Workforce Investment Act. \n If I just may conclude, it's my fear that this proposal is really about curtailing costs, because \nyou're asking people to decide early in their unemployment, are they going to accept this personal re-employment account so they can get a bonus after 13 weeks. If you accept this, you get $3,000 to spend. But the Secretary earlier said that $3,000 is what, on average, people use. This is a maximum in this plan. Okay. Then if you accept this, and you fail to find work, you're not eligible for the intensive services available in the workforce development system. And then if you're \nunemployed after 26 weeks, of course, you're not going to get any extended benefits later this year, \nso you're just out of luck. \n And so I fear that this is not really going to be that useful to the unemployed. And thank \nyou very much. \nSTATEMENT OF DR. LAWRENCE MISHEL, PRESIDENT, ECONOMIC \nPOLICY INSTITUTE, WASHINGTON, D.C. – SEE APPENDIX D \nMr. McKeon . Thank you.\nMr. Miller? \nMr. Miller . Thank you very much. If I might, Mr. Mayfield, let me ask you a question. On page \nfour of your statement, item number three, you say, “When appropriate, local workforce investment areas should be permitted to add crucial Workforce Investment Act funds to an individual's \npersonal re-employment account to ensure that they can purchase the types of training assistance they need to achieve the outcome expressed in their plan.” 39\n If I read that correctly, you would augment this plan, maybe, with other services that are \navailable through the Workforce Investment Act to try to sort of ensure that you get the results you want with the personal re-employment account. Is that a fair statement of what you're suggesting there? \nMr. Mayfield . Yes, that's a fair statement. We do think that the bill should be modified in some \ncases. If you're not under the PRA, as it is now, they may spend up to $5,000 or $6,000 on individuals to find them work and be successful. \n We think it is reasonable to give the flexibility to the local boards and local individuals who \nwill implement it, that if that $3,000 has been exhausted, and the individual is participating and doing everything and getting the training, that there could be other intensive training that would be available to them under the WIA part that they ought to be able to take advantage of if that board decides that's correct. \nMr. Miller . Well, from my point of view, that's a very encouraging statement, because I think it \nmore properly reflects what's really happening with unemployed people, if you try to determine what is the best avenue to get them back to work, which may even be a new job career ladder in some other industry or place. \n But that kind of flexibility, so you can gather those resources, and try to ensure a positive \noutcome, other than being limited by the $3,000, maybe for the want of another $500 in services or something else, the plan falls apart. \nMr. Mayfield . Yes, we think these will be very limited areas. \nMr. Miller . I understand. \nMr. Mayfield . Let me tell you, we think the $3,000 and the PRA is a great start. It's very \ninnovative, and I think it's a good use of those additional funds to get targeted individuals, looking at the industry that they came from, their employment background, et cetera, get them back to work very quickly. But there will be some situations, I think, that you can anticipate, that there might be other resources that would be needed after the exhaustion of that $3,000 in that particular case. \nMr. Miller . I think that's an important suggestion for the plan. The other concern I have on that \npoint is, as I understand it, the current negotiations in the end of the year appropriations bill here, the Workforce Investment Act is about to take a $600 million hit. And so I just have some concerns whether or not we are putting up this account at the front end, but at the other end on this program that got all the accolades today, the Workforce Investment, we're whacking the budget there fairly substantially at a time of high need. \nMr. Mayfield . Well, obviously, it's still a large increase, $1.2 billion if you subtract that $600 \nmillion from this fiscal year, if that, in fact, is done. And obviously, we think there can be some economies done and tinkering with the local boards, and getting rid of the public sector people and getting more input from private sector. Because really, the public sector, other than the chief local 40\nelected official, doesn't have much power, and doesn't offer as much as the private sector, who have \nbeen out there creating jobs, who employ people, and who can give real-world ideas to how to get these individuals back to work. \nMr. Miller . Do you have an opinion or suggestion of what you anticipate when this current \nextension runs out in May, is that correct? What's your anticipation of whether or not there should be another extension for those people who are about to exhaust? \nMr. Mayfield . I'm not prepared to give an opinion on that. \nMr. Miller . Well, let me ask you this. What's the situation you have with people who have run out \nof unemployment, versus people who still have the financial underpinnings of unemployment insurance? \nWhat's the difference in your caseload, and your success ratios? Is there a difference? I \ndon't know, but is there a difference between people who have exhausted their unemployment benefits, as opposed to those who can go through the work investment programs while they have some financial underpinnings? \nMr. Mayfield . Well, those individuals who have exhausted their unemployment benefits can still \ntake advantage of the training through the local One-Stop. So I don't know if there is what you're talking about, the experience or correlation on that. I'm not prepared to answer that. \nMr. Miller . Thank you. \nMr. McKeon . Thank you. \nMr. Wilson? \nMr. Wilson . Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Commissioner Mayfield, it's an honor to have you here \nwith us. I never had the honor of being a county councilman, commissioner, or municipal official, but I have always respected the fact that you are on the front line. As an elected official, you are with the people daily, hourly, by the minute. So I appreciate your statement about real world experience.\n I want to commend the county councils, because it's your jurisdiction for the One-Stop \nCareer Centers that have been so successful in encouraging people to find employment, by really being so helpful and enthusiastic. \n In particular, I also appreciate the suggestions you have for the modifications for the PRA, \nthe personal re-employment accounts. And I think that, as you point out, there should be a plan adopted. I think that makes sense. That's just real world, again. This is not make-believe, it's just helpful, and I hope that that can be done. \n Of course, the flexibility and latitude, I think, is so crucial. Every person, every \ncommunity, is different, and we respect that. And that dreaded word “mandates.” We don't want 41\nmandates, we want you and then the people you work with to administer the program. \n And I also think it works so well with the success of the welfare reform program that we \nwill be voting on tomorrow. And there was prognostication that that plan would be disastrous, but it has had the opposite effect. And so I want to thank you for persisting. \n In regard to the public/private partnerships, could you review the experience Dallas has had \nfor us, and in particular, you said to add more on the private side. Could you tell us about that? \nMr. Mayfield . Yes, Dallas has been very successful, and it's because of the energy and the \ncontributions that the private sector individuals have brought to the table. And that's what we want to encourage, and make sure that we have more of, because sometimes the public sector members of the committee want to delay certain things. \n The private sector is used to implementing things, seeing things work, demanding \naccountability, et cetera, and so that's what we want to keep up. And we think it would be beneficial if we just reduced the committee by the public sector individuals that are on it, and perhaps added some more private sector individuals to replace them. \nMr. Wilson . Well, all of us were always impressed by the enthusiasm of Texans, particularly \npeople from Dallas. And so we appreciate your service. \n I have no further questions. Mr. Mayfield . But let me just say that the National Association of Counties stands ready as a \nresource, particularly on how any of these programs play out in the counties across the United \nStates. And we are very thankful to work with the Department of Labor, and the staff of this \nCommittee and this Committee to, hopefully, bring you some good insight and some good recommendations to make a better bill to get a better result in the work place. \nMr. Wilson . Thank you. \nMr. McKeon . Thank you. \nMr. Kildee. \nMr. Kildee . Thank you, Mr. Chairman. \nDr. Mishel, it's always good to have you before our Committee. \nDr. Mishel . Thank you. \nMr. Kildee . Let me ask you this question. To what extent do you think the Administration \nunderestimates the stimulus of that unemployment compensation? 42\nDr. Mishel . Well, apparently, they must underestimate it a lot, because they're not really very \nprone to providing much. So it turns out that the projections I mentioned earlier from Economy.com\n, a very mainstream forecasting firm, show that the most stimulating aspect of all the \ndifferent plans that have been proposed is actually providing extended UI benefits. \n And the reason is easy to understand. Money you give to someone in those circumstances, \nwe know is going to be spent. And so that will help the economy, because the problem we have in the economy, I think as you understand, is 74 percent of our industrial capacity is used. We're not using the capacity we have now to produce goods and services. What we need are more customers. We don't need more supply-side; we need more demand, more customers. \n You get more customers only a few ways. You give money to some people who are going \nto spend it, or the government actually spends money. The government can spend money in ways that have been suggested, such as giving fiscal relief to the states, or give money to renovate and repair schools, infrastructure, or you give money to people who are going to spend it, which means, necessarily, that you have to have the tax cuts targeted, distributionally, at low and middle-income families. \n Now, of course, that's not what we see with the President's plan, but it is possible to have a \none-time tax cut given to people who are going to spend it. Senator Daschle proposes giving $300 per adult and $300 for the first two children. On the House side, I think some are saying that we should give a certain percentage of wages earned last year, money that could be given to people in April.\n So it's very possible to give money to people who spend, and I think that's what we really \nneed to get some jobs created in this calendar year. \nMr. Kildee . When the Secretary was here, I mentioned Genesee Valley Mall, one of the big malls \nin my district. I can recall 10 or 12 years ago, when the auto industry was going through a great transition, for the first time I had had two meetings with the entrepreneurs and managers at Genesee Valley Mall within about eight months' time. \n The individuals at one meeting were begging me to vote against the increase in minimum \nwage. We had breakfast, and I told them very politely, that I was going to vote for it. But they were telling me, “Please, it will hurt our business if you vote for the minimum wage.” \n About eight months later, they called me out there for another breakfast meeting, saying, \n“When are you going to appropriate the money for the TAA or TRA?” Because they knew that the autoworkers needed that TAA and TRA. And once they got the money, they would be out there spending the money. And that is a stimulus there is no question. \n It's a stimulus that keeps going. Because once their shelves became a little empty, they \nplace orders at the various companies, and they in turn, keep people employed. So it keeps going on and on, and I really believe that the White House is, as you say, greatly underestimating, at least by their actions, the stimulus effect of unemployment compensation. 43\nDr. Mishel . In fact, it's almost as if they designed a plan that was to be ineffective. I was really \nsurprised about it. I had a great day on Monday spending time with these Nobel laureates, talking about the Bush economic plan. And one of the ones from the University of California Berkeley, Daniel McFadden, said that it was an anti-stimulatory plan. It was like a weapon of mass destruction aimed at the middle class. Now, that's not the usual kind of language you get from academics. It's the students at Berkeley who are known to be radicals, not the faculty by the way. \n Professor Franco Modigliani, who laid the foundation for modern economics, an 85-year-\nold man, flew down against doctor's orders because he said he wanted to protest the Bush tax cut, and said that the only reason to do this would be if you wanted to enrich the very rich. \n I find policy people in Washington don't use language like that. But it's surprising; I have \nnever seen any statement on economics signed by 10 Nobel laureates in economics. They are really unified that this is not going to increase investment in jobs in the long run. And Alan Greenspan, yesterday, agreed with them, saying that if you want to do a dividend tax cut, maybe that's a good idea, but it's got to be revenue-neutral. It shouldn't lead to chronic deficits far off into the future. \n And so he's echoing, in a sense, what I think these very brilliant economists have already \nsaid. If you wanted to design something that wasn't going to have an effect in the long run, you would do the dividend tax cut without offsetting revenues. You can't have a long-run effect from the other part of the tax cut, which is basically advancing personal income tax cuts that are already scheduled. I mean, how can advancing something that's already scheduled have a big effect 10 years from now? \n Thank you very much. \nMr. Kildee . Thank you. \nMr. McKeon . Thank you. I am sure when we get to the President's economic growth plan, we will \nhave hearings, and we will spend a lot of time discussing it. Today we are talking about the personal responsibility plan that has been presented. \n You know, it's interesting to me listening to this discussion today, I sometimes wonder if \nI'm on a different planet. We have unemployed people that need help. The President has proposed $3.6 billion worth of help, and we're beating it up. Maybe it's not enough. But why don't we move forward, and then maybe talk about more? Why don't we move forward on the plan to help, and get it to the people that need it the most? \n Commissioner, the Department's budget proposes base re-allotment; we will talk about \nWIA now. They talk about this base re-allotment of the WIA funds among states on unexpended balances. However, we regularly hear from rural areas that these balances do not reflect the actual level of funds available to states and local areas, as many times these funds are often obligated to training and other uses. We are trying to figure out how we grapple with that. 44\n One of the reasons they are saying they want to cut is because they haven't spent the money \nthat we have already given them. And when we talk to them, they say, “Well, we have obligated the funds, but it's the accounting system.” Do you have some suggestions for us as we move forward on the re-authorization of WIA? \nMr. Mayfield . Well, we would be happy to gather some statistics and information from counties \naround the United States regarding that issue, because there is a difference of opinion in looking at what monies are available, because they are obligated, in most instances. They are obligated to be spent; they just have not been formally spent yet, and still are on the books. But they are obligated. \n So that is a problem, and we feel that our accounting and the amounts of funds that are \navailable are more accurate than the Department of Labor's accounting. \nMr. McKeon . This is something I think we are really going to have to pull together and work on, \nbecause I think if we had done a better job of pleading our case, we wouldn't have had that $600 million cut. Because every time I talked to them, their rationale for it is that they don't need it, because the monies out there aren't spent. \n We found one other thing. It just seems to me, in talking to people at the One-Stop, they \ntell me that it took them some time to get up to speed and get things going. We just passed the Act in 1998, and then got the regs written and forwarded to the local people to implement, and that's another reason why they haven't spent those funds. \nMr. Mayfield . Absolutely, absolutely. That is the de lay that is unaccounted for in there. Had \neverything been up and running, and everybody ready to go the minute the law was passed, you wouldn't see that there. But because of those delays, you have those balances. \nMr. McKeon . Well, I think those two things are things we have to really work on, because we \nshouldn't have had that $600 million cut. And especially now when we do have an unemployment problem, and we have people out there that need these resources, we really need to be focused in on that. And that's something we need to look at when we do the re-authorization. \nMr. Mayfield . We would offer to work very closely with you to get some statistics and \ninformation on that, to help in that regard. \nMr. McKeon . I want to thank you both for being here today. Excuse me. Mr. Miller? \nMr. Miller . Thank you. I would like to have a chance to ask some questions of Dr. Mishel. \nMr. McKeon . I was using my time. \nMr. Miller . Oh, I'm sorry; I thought you were getting ready to close the hearing. \nMr. McKeon . I am. 45\nMr. Miller . I wanted to ask a second round of questions under the rules. \nMr. McKeon . Go ahead. \nMr. Miller . Thank you.\nDr. Mishel, first of all, the program on Monday was spectacular. It was really one of the \nbest conversations on our economy that I think could have been put forth in front of the American people, and also incredibly understandable, given that they were all economists speaking there. \nDr. Mishel . I understand. Thank you very much. \nMr. Miller . The reason you're here is that the title of this hearing is “Back to Work: The \nAdministration's Plan for Economic Recovery And The Workforce Investment Act.” \n If you go back to your testimony, on page six, talking about the forecasts of Economy.com\n,\nand by microeconomics advisors and others, the question is, will this $3,000 allowance work? Will this have an impact? Will it make a difference for these workers? \n A lot of this, I think, makes sense in terms of making sure that people can pick up the \noptions that might make sense to them, whether it's at a community college, other access to training, or what have you. But I go back to “where are the jobs”? I mean, if you read the combination of economic forecasts, and as you point out, from very mainstream economic forecasters, including even the President's, Mr. Hubbard, in the short term and the long term, there is no real job growth here. I mean, at one point you get the President's plan creating over several years maybe 100,000, 150,000 jobs. \nDr. Mishel . Right. \nMr. Miller . So where do we get this? I mean, you mentioned that it's a lack of the demand. Again, \nif you read the business journals, you have the CEO of almost every company saying, “We're concerned about the demand for our products,” whether they're selling automobiles, semi-conductors, microchips, whatever they're selling, every company has said, “We're concerned about the softness of demand.” \nDr. Mishel . Thank you for your question. In fact, that is exactly what the Business Roundtable \nsaid a few months ago, when they issued a call for a stimulus plan, that they needed customers, they needed demand. \n Well, let's just look at the short run, what we can expect, in terms of jobs and \nunemployment. I was a little bit surprised by Secretary Chao saying that 5.7 percent is what the average was in the 1990s sort of indicating that it was somehow acceptable. It was just two years ago we had roughly 4 percent unemployment, and I think that needs to be our target. \nChairman Greenspan yesterday suggested that unemployment is going to remain as high as \nit is now, or higher, over the next year. If that's the case, we know that it's going to be very hard to 46\nget work. The numbers that were reflected earlier in a question from the JOLTS survey of the \nBureau of Labor Statistics that there are less than 3 million vacancies, but more than 8 million people looking for work indicates that there are basically three unemployed workers for every job available.\n Now, that doesn't mean that we shouldn't do things on the workforce training side. I think \neverybody here agrees that we need to give everybody help. But you know, in economics we learned that somehow there is a queue, and sometimes these things just jump people in the queue. What we really need to do is get rid of the number of unemployed. And the only way to do that is to really focus your money on how to create jobs right now, and stimulate demand. And I think that's what you're driving at, and I think that would be very important to do. \n So a training strategy coupled with a job creation strategy makes sense. A training strategy \nthat is not coupled with a job creation strategy is not so sensible, in my view. \nMr. Miller . Well, I guess it's just a problem for us. You know, we, the Democrats, put together an \neconomic stimulus package. The President then said that they shouldn't view his package as economic stimulus; they should view it as growth. But when the econometrics people look at the growth, they say the growth isn't there over the long term, and short term, the help in the jobs isn't there.\nI just see that we have a couple of ships; we've got the unemployed going in one direction in \nthe middle of the night, and we've got the ship of state going in the other direction, and we're going to pass right by one another. And this is going to be millions of families where there isn't going to be the help. \n When we're constructing these accounts, again, which I'm not hostile to, the question has \ngot to be at the end of the day, is a person more likely to get a job? Is the person, in fact, going to get a job? And I don't see that. \n And you know, you can even layer over the top of that that we now see more and more \ncompanies moving to Asia, not to sell into the Asian market, but for export. You just saw the largest semiconductor in Taiwan, which was a low-cost producer decide that they are moving to China of all things; Taiwanese companies moving to China for export. You see Honda moving to China for export. You see General Motors moving to Korea for export back to the American market. That suggests that some of these jobs that we have lost in this recession may not be coming back. \nYou know, that's another layer on top of this notion of whether we're creating long-term \ngrowth or short-term stimulus, and it appears that the Administration is creating neither, except deficit. I mean, you kind of get the deficit, but you don't get the benefit. \nMr. McKeon . Mr. Kildee, did you have a question? \nMr. Miller . I feel I just had the last word that I'm probably going to get here. 47\nMr. McKeon . I think the rules also say Mr. Kildee may question. \nMr. Kildee . No, I have no further questions. \nMr. McKeon . Thank you very much. We appreciate your being here today.\nWe have Mr. Kucinich's remarks to enter into the record. \nMr. Kucinich . Thank you. \nMr. McKeon . If there are any other statements, we will keep the record open. \nWe appreciate your working with us as we go through this process, and your input, as we \ngo through the Workforce Investment Act. \n Thank you very much. This hearing is adjourned. \nWhereupon, at 12:45 p.m., the Committee was adjourned 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144\nTable of Indexes \nChairman Boehner, 2, 5, 8, 9, 13, 14, 17, 19, 20, 22, 23, 25, 26, 28, 30, 33, 34, 36, 38, 40, 41, 43, \n44, 45, 46, 47 \nMr. Andrews, 30, 31, 32, 33 Mr. Case, 17, 18, 19 Mr. DeMint, 17 Mr. Johnson, 13, 14, 34 Mr. Kildee, 14, 26, 27, 28, 41, 42, 43, 47 Mr. Kucinich, 47 Mr. Mayfield, 39, 40, 41, 44 Mr. McKeon, 34 Mr. Miller, 9, 10, 11, 12, 38, 39, 40, 44, 45, 46 Mr. Mishel, 41, 42, 43, 45 Mr. Osborne, 19, 20 Mr. Payne, 20, 21, 22 Mr. Porter, 25 Mr. Van Hollen, 28, 29, 30 Mr. Wilson, 22, 23, 40, 41 Ms. Sanchez, 15, 16 Ms. Woolsey, 23, 24, 25 Secretary Chao, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, \n31, 32, 33 \n\u001f"
} |
[
-0.03573104366660118,
0.010522511787712574,
0.04956355318427086,
0.05457016080617905,
-0.008731186389923096,
-0.043195731937885284,
-0.00032762467162683606,
-0.02985217422246933,
-0.02962004765868187,
-0.0432678759098053,
-0.003292073030024767,
-0.058880433440208435,
0.02516048029065132,
-0.023792928084731102,
-0.049644555896520615,
0.05371759459376335,
0.0788441076874733,
-0.03443952649831772,
-0.09171243011951447,
0.0004701770667452365,
-0.027548503130674362,
0.06454738974571228,
0.0031189892906695604,
-0.05129333585500717,
-0.11678793281316757,
0.010191207751631737,
-0.08448169380426407,
-0.03184989467263222,
0.02261153981089592,
-0.020210152491927147,
0.06801360100507736,
0.0420340970158577,
0.025236768648028374,
-0.03137383610010147,
0.14135272800922394,
0.01403717789798975,
0.0410914346575737,
-0.09196717292070389,
0.002182326978072524,
0.02420603297650814,
0.001470419461838901,
0.016652381047606468,
-0.07651075720787048,
-0.027909617871046066,
-0.02171255834400654,
0.07972170412540436,
0.019984981045126915,
-0.05197133868932724,
0.08950812369585037,
-0.07850709557533264,
-0.018473470583558083,
0.019890235736966133,
0.06950560957193375,
0.010662922635674477,
-0.024729449301958084,
-0.02817576378583908,
0.08697877824306488,
-0.008088150061666965,
-0.019177231937646866,
0.02270713448524475,
0.07022944837808609,
-0.015276051126420498,
0.03711432218551636,
0.011086618527770042,
0.011842217296361923,
0.08218354731798172,
-0.08212947100400925,
-0.039434172213077545,
-0.009423834271728992,
-0.15460112690925598,
0.08771800249814987,
-0.015397354029119015,
-0.09729821234941483,
-0.00461187306791544,
0.03130744397640228,
0.010143362917006016,
-0.01294788159430027,
0.022684169933199883,
0.060390375554561615,
-0.05340134724974632,
-0.06438446789979935,
-0.01810743659734726,
0.058966007083654404,
-0.028543610125780106,
0.044394198805093765,
0.02940841019153595,
-0.06337390840053558,
-0.018710998818278313,
0.008375922217965126,
0.036976490169763565,
0.02964797057211399,
-0.024777362123131752,
0.007350036408752203,
-0.05226370319724083,
0.019258888438344002,
0.01251425314694643,
0.059668611735105515,
-0.06080440431833267,
-0.010216441936790943,
0.04195742309093475,
-0.009107263758778572,
-0.0023132457863539457,
-0.13613229990005493,
-0.07473380118608475,
-0.00027943868190050125,
0.02024908922612667,
0.030947154387831688,
0.056349437683820724,
-0.07504995167255402,
0.07855792343616486,
0.018070273101329803,
-0.046261612325906754,
0.02323729358613491,
0.013987320475280285,
0.050596483051776886,
0.03969836235046387,
0.00479702977463603,
0.08800794184207916,
0.10636585205793381,
-0.039205241948366165,
-0.0063298773020505905,
-0.04844817519187927,
0.015410938300192356,
0.06298216432332993,
0.11062441766262054,
-0.050753701478242874,
0.03554585576057434,
5.4562766998484574e-33,
0.03093775548040867,
0.020598063245415688,
-0.02033492736518383,
-0.033068686723709106,
-0.011966422200202942,
-0.003638375084847212,
-0.008784024976193905,
0.01598183810710907,
0.0665227621793747,
0.029739145189523697,
-0.05912042036652565,
0.027261829003691673,
-0.046814221888780594,
-0.0706697627902031,
0.0028953389264643192,
0.04889675974845886,
-0.08293162286281586,
-0.034807685762643814,
-0.015695620328187943,
0.004975674208253622,
0.05853653326630592,
-0.11471880972385406,
0.033486947417259216,
0.07002771645784378,
0.037445250898599625,
-0.03811471909284592,
-0.016447758302092552,
0.019462207332253456,
-0.003129822202026844,
0.02339012175798416,
0.02735990099608898,
-0.02227468229830265,
0.01989012211561203,
0.03621060401201248,
0.0013980867806822062,
0.012472337111830711,
-0.06520495563745499,
0.09147470444440842,
-0.13947956264019012,
0.04032053425908089,
0.008754526264965534,
-0.026331473141908646,
-0.054117053747177124,
-0.003848440246656537,
0.015845887362957,
-0.01916744001209736,
0.1010107770562172,
-0.030263103544712067,
-0.010054013691842556,
-0.07780110090970993,
-0.07798908650875092,
0.07937351614236832,
-0.02047237567603588,
0.015709083527326584,
-0.03493056818842888,
-0.0324120931327343,
0.13704784214496613,
-0.02900298498570919,
-0.002710936823859811,
-0.03388301655650139,
-0.013948097825050354,
0.13392086327075958,
-0.03904227912425995,
-0.0672379732131958,
0.00809214822947979,
-0.08578510582447052,
0.00964374840259552,
0.09412716329097748,
0.0038270396180450916,
-0.08724705874919891,
0.06663695722818375,
-0.04364536330103874,
-0.006752422545105219,
0.020589353516697884,
0.04149966686964035,
-0.07351817935705185,
-0.0629674643278122,
0.016920093446969986,
0.02982958033680916,
0.025273704901337624,
-0.027581971138715744,
-0.04416706785559654,
0.002516325330361724,
-0.009278231300413609,
-0.001935864333063364,
-0.08156180381774902,
0.043490950018167496,
0.026521367952227592,
-0.01619315706193447,
-0.045410752296447754,
0.054538045078516006,
0.07844587415456772,
0.02840515971183777,
0.01210258062928915,
0.007641201838850975,
-5.752988004385311e-33,
0.007808092050254345,
-0.02614586427807808,
0.05439390242099762,
-0.05308731645345688,
-0.03993121162056923,
-0.07354886084794998,
-0.0656343549489975,
-0.017357679083943367,
0.10299628973007202,
-0.029188716784119606,
-0.05324872210621834,
-0.06979130208492279,
-0.02332904189825058,
0.03977784514427185,
-0.01043202169239521,
0.07888995856046677,
-0.0390775203704834,
0.019648369401693344,
-0.07672734558582306,
-0.041563730686903,
-0.04688944295048714,
-0.032791104167699814,
-0.01527218334376812,
0.018368739634752274,
-0.07005029171705246,
0.06438933312892914,
0.01054690033197403,
-0.0097869373857975,
0.07673937827348709,
-0.04235979914665222,
-0.0695633813738823,
-0.07436106353998184,
-0.01429328415542841,
0.11865436285734177,
-0.0022148361895233393,
-0.06777925789356232,
0.026943087577819824,
-0.01731150597333908,
-0.05763866752386093,
-0.027281813323497772,
0.0845411941409111,
0.038653548806905746,
0.032688118517398834,
0.11733753234148026,
-0.03713272511959076,
-0.023034052923321724,
-0.06952445954084396,
-0.005019114352762699,
-0.02936958707869053,
0.014995381236076355,
0.06470657140016556,
0.03615723177790642,
-0.011222966946661472,
0.0862450823187828,
0.02791338600218296,
0.03820737823843956,
0.10556862503290176,
0.08008825778961182,
-0.06982068717479706,
0.025595244020223618,
0.08667463064193726,
0.06780751794576645,
-0.0033409709576517344,
0.027642421424388885,
-0.011315221898257732,
-0.012267345562577248,
-0.0239357128739357,
-0.017498932778835297,
-0.011676494963467121,
-0.04465329647064209,
-0.01915479078888893,
-0.08385574072599411,
-0.010704921558499336,
-0.06871233880519867,
-0.04894070699810982,
-0.00026394714950583875,
0.038306400179862976,
0.0054499185644090176,
0.028474552556872368,
-0.014038868248462677,
-0.008086036890745163,
-0.06772486120462418,
-0.033858705312013626,
0.036240354180336,
0.047408927232027054,
-0.005083948839455843,
0.023695658892393112,
-0.08586005121469498,
0.06468011438846588,
0.06565596163272858,
-0.0347236692905426,
0.054201189428567886,
-0.06124475598335266,
0.05589747428894043,
0.005915979854762554,
-5.4747239630614786e-8,
0.02296956069767475,
-0.05364729091525078,
-0.03401724621653557,
0.01475246250629425,
0.09434738755226135,
-0.047791484743356705,
0.049110397696495056,
0.042086850851774216,
-0.08471870422363281,
-0.0035077817738056183,
0.0012864117743447423,
0.03531800955533981,
-0.08898729830980301,
-0.0018182984786108136,
0.000584276276640594,
-0.014692474156618118,
-0.02787831425666809,
-0.04930989816784859,
0.03394655883312225,
-0.012861998751759529,
-0.0025280979461967945,
-0.037887513637542725,
0.008563821204006672,
0.007848801091313362,
-0.09135358035564423,
-0.04754403606057167,
0.0050439126789569855,
0.005107216536998749,
0.07622846961021423,
-0.05798604339361191,
-0.020690571516752243,
0.07344981282949448,
0.026082681491971016,
-0.03041650727391243,
0.04255068302154541,
-0.027929171919822693,
-0.05255017429590225,
0.023209670558571815,
-0.043482184410095215,
0.023301919922232628,
-0.060353316366672516,
0.04934274032711983,
-0.03775962069630623,
-0.010060558095574379,
0.0702071264386177,
-0.018444499000906944,
0.0023937493097037077,
-0.03542962670326233,
0.05005647614598274,
-0.017723456025123596,
0.017479823902249336,
-0.16239191591739655,
0.06743919104337692,
0.125141441822052,
-0.030634088441729546,
0.048157256096601486,
-0.02765127271413803,
-0.048336226493120193,
0.062099333852529526,
0.06087302416563034,
-0.0157927256077528,
0.010692350566387177,
0.0045519256964325905,
-0.020912237465381622
] | {
"pdf_file": "X2IMLLFKA2Z5YVXOFI7GIBJJBOWGR5TY.pdf",
"text": " \n \n \nREQUEST FOR INFORMATION \n \nRFI 0900 \n \nThe Idaho Department of Environmental Qu ality invites you to submit a response to a \nRequest for Information (RFI 0900) for a Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance \nProgram including 1) Canyon County and its citi es, including Kuna, Idaho and 2) \nCanyon County and its cities, including Kuna, Idaho and Ada County and its cities. Request for Information responses must be received by December 1, 2009. Please return \nyour information in a sealed envelope ma rked “RFI 0900 for Vehicle Inspection and \nMaintenance Program” addressed to: Marcia Todd, Idaho Department of Environmental \nQuality, 1410 North Hilton, Boise, Idaho 83706. The Idaho Department of Environmental Qual ity wishes to thank your organization for \nassisting the State in this endeavor. Sincerely, Dave Sande, CPA Financial Officer Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Enclosures \n \n \n \n \n \n1410 North Hilton • Boise, ID 83706-1255• (208) 373-0502 C.L. “Butch” Otter, Governor\n Toni Hardesty, DirectorSTATE OF IDAHO \n \nDEPARTMENT OF \nENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY \n \n \nRequest for Information \n \n \n \nTo Parties Interested in \n \nVehicle Inspection and Maintenance Program \n \nRFI 0900 \n \n \n \n \n \n \nDepartment of Environmental Quality \n1410 North Hilton \nBoise, Idaho 83706 \n \nNovember 6, 2009 \n \n Page 3 of 6 Table of Contents \n \n \nPurpose........... .................... ...................... ................4 \n \nOverview................ .................. .................. ...............4 \n \nAgency Needs......... .................. .................. ...............5 \n \nResponse Requirements....... ..................... ...............5 \n \nFor More Information.......... ..................... ...............6 \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n Page 4 of 6 \n \nPurpose \n \nThe Idaho Department of Environmental Qu ality (DEQ) is seeking information from \ninterested vendors regarding methods to effi ciently and effectively implement a vehicle \ninspection and maintenance (I /M) program in accordance with Idaho Code Section 39-\n116B and pending rule Docket number 58-0101-0901, Rules for the Control of Air Pollution in Idaho. Please review the in formation on the following link for specific \ninformation regarding the lega l requirements that must be satisfied under the program. \nhttp://www.deq.idaho.gov/rules/air/58_0101_0901_proposed.cfm\n \nDEQ intends to use the information provided to develop a Request for Proposal (RFP) to \nimplement an I/M program. \nOverview \n The Legislature enacted, and the Governor signed into law on April 1, 2008, Idaho Code \nSection 39-116B, entitled Vehicl e inspection and maintenance program. It requires DEQ \nto enter into rulemaking to establish the minimum requirements for a vehicle inspection \nand maintenance program when ambient air quality concentrations in an airshed within a \nmetropolitan statistical area ar e at or above 85% of a Na tional Ambient Air Quality \nStandard (NAAQS) and motor vehicle emissions constitute one of the top two contributing sources to the concentrations. Based on recorded air quality monitoring data , DEQ determined that the ozone ambient \nconcentrations in the Treasure Valley had for the past 3 years, a de sign value greater than \n85% of the ozone NAAQS. DEQ also determin ed (included in this determination are \nAda and Canyon counties and the respective citi es only) that motor vehicle emissions \nconstitute one of the top two emission sources contributing to the 85% design value. As a \nresult DEQ entered into a negotiated ru lemaking, and the Board of Environmental \nQuality adopted as pending, the rule Docket referenced above. Per Idaho Code Section 39-116B(3), the aff ected counties and cities were given the \noption of (1) entering into a joint exercise of powers agreement with DEQ, (2) submitting \nan alternative motor vehicle emission cont rol strategy that woul d result in emission \nreductions equivalent to that of an I/M progr am, or (3) if the affect ed counties and cities \ndo not choose (1) or meet the requirements of (2) then DEQ or its designee must \nimplement an I/M program for the area. DEQ received various responses from the citi es and counties covering all three options. \nUnfortunately, although the proposed alternat ive motor vehicle strategies submitted by \nseveral entities were commendable, they fell far short of the emission reductions \npredicted to result from an I/M program. Consequently, DEQ is seeking information \nunder this request for information (RFI) to as sist in developing a request for proposal \n(RFP) to implement the I/M program. Page 5 of 6 \nCurrently, Ada County and its cities, ex cluding Kuna, implement an I/M program \npursuant to a joint exercise of powers agreement. This program was established as part \nof a carbon monoxide attainment plan. It is anticipated that the RFP will seek a cost \nproposal to implement a program in Canyon Co unty and the city of Kuna, and a second \ncost proposal to implement a program in Ada County. Interested vendors should \nunderstand that the I/M program being proposed may include: (1) Canyon county and its \ncities, and the city of Kuna, or (2) Canyon County and its cities, and the city of Kuna, and \nAda County and its cities. With the info rmation obtained during the RFI and RFP \nprocess, DEQ will discuss with Ada county a nd its cities the options available. Ada \nCounty and its cities may enter into a join t exercise of powers agreement with DEQ \nwherein they opt to implement the same I/M program as that in Canyon County. On the other hand, they may enter into a joint exercise of powers ag reement wherein they opt to \ncontinue operating a program similar to that in operation now. To fulfill the statement of purpose of Idaho C ode Section 39-116B, that is to implement \nan I/M program in an airshed that is a pproaching nonattainment, it is DEQ’s goal to \nimplement as fully as possible an I/M progr am by the next ozone season, which begins \napproximately on June 1, 2010. \nAgency Needs \n DEQ intends to issue an RFP to identify a successful bidder interested in implementing \nan I/M program. At present DEQ is aware of f our different types of I/M programs. These \ninclude a centralized program, where all ve hicles are tested at a central location, a \ndecentralized program, where vehicles are te sted in various locations throughout the area \n(this is the system currently in place in Ada County), a hybrid version (incorporating \nelements of both a centralized and decentr alized programs), and a remote sensing \nprogram, where vehicles are screened when tr aveling by a remote sensor. Those vehicles \nthat do not pass the screen test are then re quired to undergo additional testing. This RFI \nrequests information about these programs and any other potential suitable programs. \n The contractor will be paid th rough the collection of inspection fees from motorists. The \nfee is capped by Idaho Code S ection 39-116B at $20 per vehicle. From the fee collected, \nwhich could be lower than $20, the contractor must pay DEQ monies sufficient for DEQ \nto cover its administrative and oversight co sts, fund a public outreach program per Idaho \nCode Section 39-116B(2)(g) and reimburse the Idaho departme nt of transportation for \ncosts associated with the registration revoc ation procedure described in Idaho Code \nSection 39-116B(4). \nResponse Requirements \n DEQ is looking for an efficient and cost eff ective way to fulfill its statutory requirement \nto implement an I/M program. DEQ intends to use the informati on collected under this \nRFI to issue an RFP. Page 6 of 6 In responding to this RFI, please provide the following: \n \n1. Brief summary of your business and qualifications \n2. Information regarding technologies ava ilable to assist DEQ in identifying \nprogram options \n3. Description of overall program and admini stration to operate a fully implemented \nI/M program \n4. Description of program implementation incl uding types, numbers and locations of \ntesting, data collection methods , and reporting mechanisms \n5. An estimated timeline for designing and implementing an I/M program \n If any vendor believes their responses contain confidential information, please mark those \npages accordingly. Cost information and costing models will be used for budgetary or planning purposes only, and can be marked conf idential if necessary. DEQ is interested \nin suggestions and elements necessary to secure the best possible RFP. \n Written responses and supporting informati on must be received by December 1, 2009. \n Please send written response a nd supporting information to: \n Marcia Todd Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Fiscal Office 1410 North Hilton Boise, Idaho 83706 \nDEQ wishes to thank respondents fo r assistance in this endeavor. \n \nFor more information \n Potential respondents may contact Marcia Todd at the above address, by email at \nmarcia.todd@deq.idaho.gov or by phone at (208 ) 373-0286 for additional information. "
} |
[
0.008468687534332275,
0.0004605625581461936,
0.03584277257323265,
-0.003962260205298662,
0.004003740381449461,
-0.0035983314737677574,
-0.01068340428173542,
0.05450991541147232,
-0.13777227699756622,
0.05571148917078972,
0.04734749346971512,
0.012686562724411488,
0.07624810934066772,
0.01710350066423416,
-0.00023452728055417538,
0.08631066977977753,
0.027783717960119247,
0.03670913353562355,
-0.026417989283800125,
-0.003784402273595333,
0.0546257421374321,
-0.06819989532232285,
-0.010183126665651798,
0.05242801457643509,
-0.013664322905242443,
0.05661674961447716,
0.06342283636331558,
-0.049810752272605896,
-0.06327822059392929,
0.0012774441856890917,
0.045481353998184204,
0.007272427901625633,
0.048795223236083984,
0.009348533116281033,
0.07666018605232239,
0.032375361770391464,
0.04457741603255272,
0.04835911840200424,
-0.04762175679206848,
-0.03239481523633003,
-0.11826043576002121,
-0.029514793306589127,
-0.04186609387397766,
-0.022368930280208588,
0.059691399335861206,
0.022430285811424255,
0.020647449418902397,
-0.05366353690624237,
0.004139499738812447,
0.04245676100254059,
-0.04980364441871643,
-0.06562264263629913,
0.011834127828478813,
-0.0340360663831234,
-0.07086437195539474,
0.03803751990199089,
-0.09031470865011215,
-0.03310967981815338,
-0.017696503549814224,
-0.029579639434814453,
-0.032490331679582596,
-0.022331928834319115,
-0.05830251798033714,
-0.008023599162697792,
-0.05410545691847801,
0.045605044811964035,
-0.00009808455797610804,
0.008431266993284225,
0.11550803482532501,
-0.03167959675192833,
0.032748475670814514,
-0.01973973773419857,
0.008718087337911129,
-0.03938569128513336,
0.0022027441300451756,
0.00342651829123497,
-0.0035103955306112766,
0.06610056757926941,
-0.017330648377537727,
-0.08404776453971863,
-0.046717170625925064,
0.006996163632720709,
0.02831144444644451,
0.05176527425646782,
0.008882497437298298,
0.031185252591967583,
0.03205348178744316,
0.016390955075621605,
0.049659308046102524,
0.012196610681712627,
-0.035698212683200836,
0.037287332117557526,
0.04046151414513588,
-0.005900685675442219,
0.028801249340176582,
0.014190460555255413,
-0.08737537264823914,
-0.10816272348165512,
0.01064103003591299,
0.0015370632754638791,
-0.03413846716284752,
-0.016450682654976845,
0.04226819425821304,
-0.013858558610081673,
-0.016993723809719086,
-0.04967841878533363,
0.03416221961379051,
-0.05842157453298569,
-0.010862885043025017,
0.12467628717422485,
0.08115588873624802,
-0.0011410266160964966,
0.014911954291164875,
-0.022288398817181587,
-0.0325421579182148,
0.038222309201955795,
-0.07733818143606186,
0.015774577856063843,
0.036834027618169785,
0.12866301834583282,
-0.06840904802083969,
0.028650978580117226,
0.06728669255971909,
-0.03057353012263775,
-0.04782666638493538,
-0.03206358104944229,
-0.03680993244051933,
4.33556369185235e-33,
0.007933463901281357,
0.09447912126779556,
0.020284870639443398,
0.023146091029047966,
0.050390418618917465,
-0.08284968137741089,
-0.018750978633761406,
-0.03571922704577446,
-0.020759930834174156,
0.05466878414154053,
0.010166247375309467,
-0.0008804670651443303,
0.03102664090692997,
0.05855369195342064,
0.08976804465055466,
-0.05620376765727997,
-0.03575551509857178,
-0.04828984662890434,
-0.0414331778883934,
0.06279066205024719,
0.0029920043889433146,
-0.1255270093679428,
0.05139157921075821,
-0.03216168284416199,
0.09805595129728317,
0.1009616032242775,
-0.0009436213877052069,
0.06283815950155258,
0.08284617215394974,
0.021711919456720352,
-0.012392476201057434,
-0.015412557870149612,
-0.06004102900624275,
-0.05067012831568718,
0.024720219895243645,
0.03236296772956848,
-0.02163371443748474,
-0.018391454592347145,
-0.045926470309495926,
-0.04413101077079773,
-0.007490305230021477,
-0.1061636433005333,
0.020186007022857666,
-0.04750826582312584,
0.09310338646173477,
-0.011010908521711826,
0.07097338140010834,
-0.004422100260853767,
0.03238273039460182,
0.06017284095287323,
-0.026334011927247047,
-0.031119732186198235,
-0.03297591954469681,
-0.06545018404722214,
-0.09309814125299454,
-0.06855287402868271,
-0.0019665334839373827,
-0.015676110982894897,
-0.024580547586083412,
0.045284204185009,
-0.030827326700091362,
-0.027267713099718094,
0.02586747333407402,
0.0030999844893813133,
0.013440108858048916,
-0.03362676873803139,
-0.04199980944395065,
-0.019724542275071144,
0.11870226263999939,
-0.09541680663824081,
-0.046969443559646606,
-0.0018395630177110434,
0.024339810013771057,
0.048713892698287964,
0.009378052316606045,
-0.018664466217160225,
-0.07134906202554703,
0.020781654864549637,
0.023608189076185226,
0.03501060605049133,
-0.0504002645611763,
-0.06245343014597893,
-0.014114124700427055,
-0.033371515572071075,
0.06800217926502228,
-0.03328351303935051,
0.03753150999546051,
-0.024011438712477684,
-0.04837536811828613,
0.024847522377967834,
-0.07650738954544067,
0.02054145745933056,
-0.04962652549147606,
0.14098107814788818,
0.0317453071475029,
-5.385523327530479e-33,
0.04091997817158699,
0.018666299059987068,
0.0550052672624588,
-0.013001593761146069,
0.010526894591748714,
-0.04222807660698891,
0.048033930361270905,
-0.12305222451686859,
0.06025569140911102,
0.00627366965636611,
-0.12129290401935577,
-0.04044853895902634,
0.002799601061269641,
0.0032233844976872206,
-0.0151685681194067,
-0.03074110485613346,
0.04357226938009262,
-0.02879217639565468,
-0.0067496406845748425,
0.009304268285632133,
-0.07049162685871124,
0.05585881322622299,
-0.1364179104566574,
-0.008346901275217533,
0.007107960060238838,
0.02921680547297001,
0.005068517290055752,
-0.004918219055980444,
0.05021535977721214,
0.08167656511068344,
0.016374865546822548,
-0.051706667989492416,
0.07020560652017593,
-0.0155414380133152,
-0.02025521919131279,
0.008323772810399532,
-0.02666175551712513,
0.050078440457582474,
0.0014065331779420376,
0.01976267248392105,
0.08496549725532532,
-0.07248356938362122,
0.07470697164535522,
-0.06011945381760597,
-0.01596236601471901,
0.05147574096918106,
0.031109660863876343,
0.06013062596321106,
-0.13110314309597015,
0.015566332265734673,
0.011289332062005997,
0.037680719047784805,
-0.05069388076663017,
-0.03194752335548401,
0.08229798078536987,
0.055577147752046585,
0.02136177383363247,
-0.05057951807975769,
-0.003569162916392088,
-0.04632047563791275,
0.009451783262193203,
-0.035053543746471405,
-0.00913409236818552,
0.11526981741189957,
0.01845223270356655,
-0.08252658694982529,
-0.06813571602106094,
-0.07113218307495117,
-0.10306506603956223,
0.0027070920914411545,
-0.08838395774364471,
0.042365871369838715,
0.07032546401023865,
-0.09008552134037018,
0.01736465096473694,
-0.03653699904680252,
0.037305641919374466,
0.017940590158104897,
-0.03712703660130501,
-0.06453303247690201,
0.054845184087753296,
-0.047919563949108124,
-0.017849920317530632,
0.0848514512181282,
-0.02023368328809738,
0.046163029968738556,
0.017116036266088486,
-0.054955922067165375,
0.007557631004601717,
0.04722956195473671,
-0.07297980040311813,
0.05820538103580475,
-0.03237273544073105,
0.024250030517578125,
-0.09301535785198212,
-4.790839724932994e-8,
0.004961759317666292,
0.039448004215955734,
-0.05604507774114609,
0.028197558596730232,
0.05335098132491112,
0.09101889282464981,
0.004299484193325043,
0.04436212405562401,
-0.046517424285411835,
0.05560395494103432,
0.037605784833431244,
0.03398710489273071,
-0.119098000228405,
0.03943720459938049,
0.03354055434465408,
-0.04041575267910957,
0.017877882346510887,
0.044078536331653595,
-0.009364810772240162,
0.012445138767361641,
-0.052766162902116776,
-0.051124926656484604,
-0.04906157776713371,
0.05832963064312935,
0.021085446700453758,
-0.03641200810670853,
-0.030187685042619705,
-0.01516851969063282,
0.003286006161943078,
0.03240673989057541,
0.029854493215680122,
-0.02862182818353176,
0.07452923059463501,
0.040470387786626816,
-0.007072874344885349,
-0.03571678325533867,
-0.02296842820942402,
0.050799280405044556,
0.10333867371082306,
0.040754180401563644,
0.020498057827353477,
0.08979063481092453,
-0.022027818486094475,
-0.02772374451160431,
-0.026817098259925842,
0.008391344919800758,
-0.046363092958927155,
-0.0860900804400444,
0.031048674136400223,
0.05472192540764809,
-0.08271186053752899,
-0.06426902860403061,
0.019970135763287544,
0.022470280528068542,
0.08207837492227554,
0.08141998201608658,
-0.024160977452993393,
-0.12366431206464767,
0.05426710098981857,
0.04934052377939224,
-0.0006253895699046552,
0.011669534258544445,
-0.11186995357275009,
0.0217901598662138
] | {
"pdf_file": "EZCGBU5BSAHPIJIBP3AKOZX7WYPWQXTE.pdf",
"text": "SNAP software training\nHow you can use the new SNAP software to create \na safe walking and biking plan for your school\n Training Objectives\n-How to create a SNAP Plan\n-How to use new SNAP \nSoftware\n-How to create a map for administrators\n-How to create a map for students and parents\n-How to distribute the map\n What is a SNAP plan?\n-Required by Utah law\n-Free SNAP Planning Guide \nand Software\n-School Community Councils, Gold Medal School Mentors \nand Coordinators\n What’s in a SNAP plan?\n-Map \n-Outlining safest walking and biking \nroutes\n-Text description\n-Explaining routing plan\n-Drop -off/pick -up map\n-GMS schools required to submit\n Steps to create a SNAP plan\n1. Perform an inventory by physically \nwalking the routes\n-Identify signals, stop signs, crosswalks, \npotential obstacles, railroad crossings, \nmissing/damaged sidewalks\n2. Use SNAP software to create map\n-Administrator map\n-Student map\n3. Create a text description of student \nmap and safest routes\n4. GMS must create drop -off/pick -up \nmap \n Goal of SNAP plan\n-A SNAP map should identify the safest\nwalking/biking routes\n-Should notshow every possible route\n SNAP plan review process\n1. School’s SNAP team submits plan for review to \ndistrict’s Traffic Safety Committee\n2. Traffic Safety Committee submits plan to local \nUDOT offices and notifies local jurisdictions\n3. Final snap plan is reviewed, revised by SNAP \nteam and accepted *by appropriate jurisdictions\n4. Principal distributes student map and text \ndescription to all students\n*GMS must submit draft SNAP plan to Local Health \nDepartment by Feb. 5, 2009.\n New software features\n-Convenient\n-Web-based software\n-Can be used on PC or Mac\n-SNAP map can be shared online\n-Accurate\n-Interfaces with Google maps\n-Easy to use\n-Updated SNAP Planning Guide\n Today’s training will show…\n-Logging into SNAP software\n-Creating a school profile\n-Creating an administrator map\n-Creating a student map\n-Sharing map with students and \nparents\n SNAP Planning Guide\n-Hard copy\n-Mailed to principals\n-PDF\n-Download at \nudot.utah.gov/snap\n-Download from snapforschools.com\n-Download from GMS Guide, \n-pg. 49\n Free SNAP Resources\n-35-minute musical safety \npresentation –SNAP, Walk \n‘n Roll\n-Schedule via e- mail:\n-snap@snapforschools.com\n-Other free resources at UDOT’s SNAP Web site\n-udot.utah.gov/SNAP\n Questions?\nCherissa Wood\nUDOT Safe Routes to School Coordinator\ncwood@utah.gov\n(801) 965- 4486\n"
} |
[
-0.03888215124607086,
0.07184045016765594,
-0.021369516849517822,
-0.02281445823609829,
-0.04793642461299896,
-0.07650329172611237,
-0.05573306232690811,
0.05687473341822624,
-0.031085826456546783,
0.033156707882881165,
-0.02848007157444954,
0.04743935912847519,
0.07595576345920563,
-0.04475513473153114,
0.012665962800383568,
0.10715346783399582,
0.06020420417189598,
0.04307517036795616,
-0.08614449203014374,
-0.005631172098219395,
0.03799569234251976,
0.006122276186943054,
-0.015607322566211224,
0.04143170267343521,
-0.023090790957212448,
0.01945684477686882,
-0.005100571550428867,
0.003584048477932811,
0.0029097367078065872,
-0.0796346589922905,
0.026241375133395195,
0.10689778625965118,
0.09605799615383148,
-0.06595364958047867,
-0.008676482364535332,
0.0648975521326065,
0.003572012996301055,
-0.08555599302053452,
0.007530998904258013,
-0.05932994559407234,
-0.10015501081943512,
-0.02856367453932762,
0.009726941585540771,
0.030362138524651527,
0.010436717420816422,
-0.014577838592231274,
-0.01281517930328846,
-0.07017011940479279,
-0.03626013174653053,
-0.02317538671195507,
-0.05956457182765007,
-0.00709168054163456,
0.008022105321288109,
-0.01951467990875244,
0.03089018166065216,
0.03984636068344116,
0.0020482477266341448,
0.054361943155527115,
-0.02828688733279705,
-0.051969364285469055,
-0.03510451316833496,
-0.003467562608420849,
0.0006186520331539214,
-0.08599545806646347,
-0.0013198500964790583,
-0.014079940505325794,
0.020150816068053246,
-0.03606347367167473,
0.06552309542894363,
-0.05276409536600113,
-0.051294777542352676,
-0.03627145662903786,
-0.01279787253588438,
-0.015245880000293255,
0.03965017572045326,
0.015551489777863026,
0.15710030496120453,
0.07736322283744812,
0.013656326569616795,
-0.06362839788198471,
0.03592504933476448,
0.023210149258375168,
-0.10539975017309189,
-0.024468455463647842,
0.019660184159874916,
-0.04579751938581467,
-0.07451663166284561,
-0.011313851922750473,
0.07008792459964752,
0.010013547725975513,
0.029002390801906586,
-0.0637282133102417,
0.007499861065298319,
-0.031083200126886368,
0.08345997333526611,
0.007111827377229929,
-0.02389082871377468,
-0.007207980379462242,
0.09181936085224152,
0.050819430500268936,
0.0072228251956403255,
0.006938401609659195,
0.07605481892824173,
-0.007463844958692789,
-0.018844231963157654,
-0.020595083013176918,
0.08012162894010544,
0.05989546701312065,
-0.0036277028266340494,
-0.13443151116371155,
-0.03321366012096405,
-0.037726111710071564,
0.0964592918753624,
-0.02153480052947998,
-0.041181810200214386,
-0.03806611895561218,
0.00975362490862608,
0.023433487862348557,
0.003210759488865733,
0.010212088003754616,
0.05797599256038666,
-0.10162068158388138,
0.08592028170824051,
0.10904044657945633,
-0.005607299041002989,
0.04908058047294617,
-0.08548539876937866,
8.836234381485322e-33,
-0.07779181003570557,
0.024767223745584488,
0.015768004581332207,
0.08663012832403183,
-0.06427175551652908,
-0.05793857201933861,
0.025544382631778717,
-0.03439612314105034,
-0.056262221187353134,
-0.017947537824511528,
-0.084784597158432,
0.07552853226661682,
-0.009717981331050396,
0.02197478897869587,
0.08748066425323486,
-0.09976936131715775,
0.009147998876869678,
0.05516109988093376,
-0.026989098638296127,
-0.02237221784889698,
0.0024135950952768326,
0.020716935396194458,
-0.0022729644551873207,
-0.0870874747633934,
0.03764602541923523,
0.08271327614784241,
0.06597685813903809,
-0.053361427038908005,
-0.09201262891292572,
0.0338614322245121,
-0.032648444175720215,
0.05290805920958519,
-0.004339729435741901,
0.06429124623537064,
0.018526166677474976,
0.016820156946778297,
0.020941613242030144,
-0.04105950891971588,
0.0007902696379460394,
-0.009905210696160793,
-0.028599699959158897,
0.02926507219672203,
0.02606750652194023,
0.0351884588599205,
-0.03309847041964531,
-0.02274312451481819,
-0.02676348388195038,
0.12986871600151062,
0.06652000546455383,
0.02035258337855339,
-0.08440768718719482,
0.04687068983912468,
0.05847245827317238,
-0.07491492480039597,
0.03582930564880371,
-0.03964056447148323,
0.0639997273683548,
-0.013406230136752129,
-0.00827313493937254,
0.12108027189970016,
-0.12011788785457611,
0.0010510626016184688,
-0.060852739959955215,
-0.0397062748670578,
0.014372014440596104,
0.0689503476023674,
-0.0818033367395401,
0.0008232105756178498,
0.08673972636461258,
0.03945183381438255,
-0.031266629695892334,
0.02739388681948185,
0.0007682902505621314,
0.025497429072856903,
0.05448160320520401,
-0.08699782937765121,
0.045362405478954315,
0.029487093910574913,
-0.059741828590631485,
-0.07190900295972824,
-0.042949553579092026,
0.16484475135803223,
-0.06265056133270264,
-0.013658457435667515,
0.03492932394146919,
-0.03369821235537529,
-0.10304109007120132,
0.019633570685982704,
-0.1250971555709839,
-0.06250351667404175,
-0.11298514902591705,
-0.05364898219704628,
0.04122556746006012,
0.08602693676948547,
-0.029499199241399765,
-7.56997570373223e-33,
0.060005269944667816,
-0.049889978021383286,
-0.08391731977462769,
-0.003959211520850658,
0.0281207412481308,
-0.008281311951577663,
-0.006762297358363867,
-0.10148598998785019,
-0.05920340493321419,
0.011516801081597805,
0.007554193492978811,
-0.039530809968709946,
0.025690888985991478,
0.006910733412951231,
-0.0054343999363482,
0.04093111678957939,
-0.02188440039753914,
-0.10935980826616287,
0.00827782042324543,
0.0336366668343544,
0.04387954622507095,
0.0951753780245781,
-0.022391220554709435,
-0.0653432235121727,
-0.02511001005768776,
0.0014219549484550953,
-0.028404509648680687,
0.09204376488924026,
0.04619435593485832,
0.07422111928462982,
-0.027228329330682755,
-0.0402023009955883,
-0.03880726546049118,
0.06357309222221375,
-0.01448153518140316,
0.034694965928792953,
0.05844492465257645,
0.04225767031311989,
-0.06070787459611893,
-0.05710026994347572,
-0.00045696794404648244,
-0.026220927014946938,
-0.05580006167292595,
-0.002787982579320669,
0.050708893686532974,
0.05100993439555168,
-0.00630273949354887,
-0.002009412506595254,
-0.05537089332938194,
-0.005296115763485432,
0.02607112005352974,
-0.052761923521757126,
0.02336374670267105,
0.0284440815448761,
-0.024690482765436172,
-0.020332226529717445,
-0.018240295350551605,
0.004005745518952608,
0.05793599411845207,
-0.025469258427619934,
0.02482878789305687,
-0.0244187880307436,
0.014105684123933315,
-0.034757956862449646,
-0.03197472169995308,
0.003008316969498992,
-0.0027002610731869936,
0.01387075800448656,
-0.019036799669265747,
-0.007539296522736549,
0.016863230615854263,
-0.014453710988163948,
0.0831729844212532,
0.027201946824789047,
0.013225522823631763,
-0.016178755089640617,
0.007400762289762497,
-0.04280887544155121,
0.026270229369401932,
-0.005714801140129566,
-0.07783563435077667,
-0.015435864217579365,
0.05369151756167412,
0.0814044326543808,
-0.04479064419865608,
-0.0047157807275652885,
-0.045831482857465744,
0.05480841547250748,
-0.014614478684961796,
-0.051847364753484726,
-0.017404213547706604,
0.0051445551216602325,
0.03813774138689041,
0.09739811718463898,
-0.019714370369911194,
-6.87453436398755e-8,
0.004109418485313654,
-0.03458298742771149,
-0.07020654529333115,
0.021810945123434067,
-0.010032766498625278,
0.04737738147377968,
-0.059791579842567444,
0.010252720676362514,
-0.08369653671979904,
-0.01833062432706356,
0.05965166911482811,
0.0018482382874935865,
-0.018266668543219566,
-0.017421137541532516,
-0.009410504251718521,
-0.013437626883387566,
0.0368659570813179,
0.10314738750457764,
-0.03879610821604729,
-0.05278509482741356,
0.0683562234044075,
0.03330393508076668,
0.020535675808787346,
0.03319654241204262,
0.0746188685297966,
-0.06939655542373657,
-0.014714724384248257,
-0.034135978668928146,
0.11085071414709091,
-0.01694723777472973,
-0.04125325754284859,
0.020738724619150162,
0.033356793224811554,
0.08703849464654922,
0.05634201690554619,
0.02199740521609783,
-0.027404246851801872,
0.04792439192533493,
-0.0071472409181296825,
0.023118067532777786,
0.014321822673082352,
0.06242172792553902,
-0.08531395345926285,
0.020659971982240677,
0.10518335551023483,
-0.005005087237805128,
-0.07315558195114136,
-0.03907941281795502,
0.01466310117393732,
0.014435194432735443,
0.022321991622447968,
0.04665003716945648,
-0.08355926722288132,
0.0474361851811409,
-0.01969439536333084,
0.013868226669728756,
0.02216489240527153,
-0.06476657092571259,
0.02943754568696022,
0.00863831490278244,
0.04240955412387848,
0.05190187320113182,
-0.015855232253670692,
-0.04968486353754997
] | {
"pdf_file": "XIQ3WFVYEVSMKJN2WPNDW74W26YD3PPG.pdf",
"text": "1\nAmerican Institute of Aeronautics and AstronauticsAIAA 2000-0421\nADVANCEMENT OF BI-LEVEL INTEGRATED SYSTEM\nSYNTHESIS (BLISS)\nJaroslaw Sobieszczanski-Sobieski*\nNASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia\nj.sobieski@larc.nasa.gov\nMark S. Emiley \nGeorge Washington University\nJoint Institute for the Advancement of Flight Sciences (JIAFS)\nm.s.emiley@larc.nasa.gov\nJeremy S. Agteà\nUnited States Air Force, San Antonio, Texas\njeremy.agte@kelly.af.mil\nRobert R. Sandusky, Jr.¤\nGeorge Washington University\nJoint Institute for the Advancement of Flight Sciences (JIAFS)\nr.r.sandusky@larc.nasa.gov\nAbstract\nBi-Level Integrated System Synthesis (BLISS) is a\nmethod for optimization of an engineering system, e.g.,an aerospace vehicle. BLISS consists of optimizations\nat the subsystem (module) and system levels to dividethe overall large optimization task into sets of smaller\nones that can be executed concurrently. In the initial\nversion of BLISS that was introduced and documented\nin previous publications, analysis in the modules was_____________________________\n* Manager, Computational AeroSciences, and Multidisciplinary\nResearch Coordinator, NASA Langley Research Center, MS 139,\nHampton, Virginia, AIAA Fellow\n Graduate Student, NASA Langley Research Center,\nMultidisciplinary Optimization Branch, MS 139, Member AIAA\nà 1st Lt United States Air Force, San Antonio Air Logistics Center,\nTX, Member AIAA\n¤ Professor, George Washington University, Joint Institute for\nAdvancement of Flight Sciences, Fellow AIAA\nCopyright Ó 2000 by the American Institute of Aeronautics, Inc. No\ncopyright is asserted in the United States under Title 17, U.S. code.\nThe Government has royalty-free license to exercise all rights underthe copyright claimed herein for government purposes. All other\nrights reserved by the copyright owner.kept at the early conceptual design level. This paper\nreports on the next step in the BLISS development inwhich the fidelity of the aerodynamic drag and\nstructural stress and displacement analyses were\nupgraded while the methodÕs satisfactory convergence\nrate was retained.\nIntroduction\nBLISS, for Bi-Level Integrated System Synthesis, is an\noptimization method for engineering a modular system,\ne.g., an aerospace vehicle, in which it is beneficial to\nseparate the design variables and constraints local to a\nmodule from those that govern the entire system. Suchseparation fosters development of a broad workfront ofpeople and computers, hence it fits well the current\ntrends for massively parallel processing in computer\ntechnology and the co ncurrent engineering style of the\nworkforce organization.\nThe focus on dividing the optimization into the\nsuboptimizations within each module (subsystem, also\ncalled the black box) and a coordinating optimization atthe system level places BLISS in the MultidisciplinaryDesign Optimization (MDO) toolbox, in the company\nof a few other methods that have the same focus as\nBLISS but differ in approach. Representative examples\nof these methods are the Collaborative Optimization 2\nAmerican Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics(CO) (Braun et al, 1965), the Concurrent SubSpace\nOptimization (CSSO) (Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, 1988,Bloebaum et al, 1992), and the Concurrent Design\nOptimization (Wujek et al, 1995).\nThe distinguishing features of BLISS are the use of the\nsystem objective (e.g., the aircraft range) as the\noptimization objective in each of the subsystems and atthe system level, and coupling between the\noptimizations at the system and subsystem levels bythe optimum sensitivity derivatives with respect to\nparameters.\nThe overall architecture of BLISS as a method does not\ndepend on the fidelity of the analyses performed in each\nmodule. Consequently, in principle at least, BLISS\nmay be used in any design phase from conceptual,through preliminary to detailed, provided thatappropriate level of analysis is implemented in the\nmodules.\nThe BLISS method was introduced in (Sobieszczanski-\nSobieski et al, 1998a) and documented in detail in(Sobieszczanski-Sobieski et al, 1998b\n*). In the paper,\nthat prototype is referred to as the original BLISS. In\nits original form BLISS modules were kept very simplecorresponding to the early conceptual design phase.\nSatisfactory results from the initial trials of BLISS on atest case of a business jet encouraged next step in the\nBLISS development - upgrading its structural analysis\nand aerodynamic drag analysis modules - and validatingon the same test case.\nThis paper reports on the above BLISS upgrade and\nresults of the testing that advance the methods toward\nbecoming a tool suitable for practical applications. Thereport provides a synopsis of the BLISS method,\ndescribes the salient features of the two upgraded\nmodules, presents satisfactory convergence results, and\nsummarizes the BLISS development status and thefuture development direction.\nNotation\nAR HT Ð tail aspect ratio\nAR W Ð wing aspect ratio\nBB i Ð black box\nCD Ð coefficient of drag\nCf Ð skin friction coefficient\nD Ð dragESF Ð engine scale factorh Ð altitude\n \n* The 1998a and 1998b references are also available at\nhttp://techreports.larc.nasa.gov/ltrs/k Ð safety factor\nL Ð liftL/D Ð lift to drag ratioL\nHT Ð horizontal tail location, % mean aerodynamic\nchord (% MAC)L\nW Ð wing location, % MAC\nM Ð Mach numberN\nZ Ð maximum load factor\nR Ð rangeSFC Ð specific fuel consumptionS\nHT Ð horizontal tail surface area\nSREF Ð wing surface area\nT Ð throttlet/c Ð thickness to chord ratiot\ni Ð wingbox sandwich face sheets thicknesses\nts,i Ð wingbox sandwich caliper thicknesses\nXi Ð design variables local to BB i\nXL, XU Ð lower and upper bounds on X, side-\nconstraintsW\nE Ð engine weight\nWF Ð fuel weight\nWT Ð total weight\nYi.j Ð behavior variables output from BB i and sent as\ninputs BB j\nZ Ð system-level design variablesl Ð taper ratio\nL\nHT Ð horizontal tail sweep\nLW Ð wing sweep\nQ Ð wing twist\nSynopsis of BLISS\nA synopsis of BLISS that also appeared in Agte et al,\n1999 is as follows.\nBLISS is a method for optimization of engineering\nsystems that separates the system-level optimization\nfrom potentially numerous autonomous subsystemoptimizations. As shown in Figure 1, it utilizes asystem architecture in which design and behavior\nvariables are split into three categories. X-variables are\nthose design variables optimized at the local level andare unique to each particular subsystem. Behavior\nvariables that are output from one subsystem and input\nto another are designated Y, and the system-level\ndesign variables are specified as Z. System-level\nvariables are those shared by at least two subsystems. 3\nAmerican Institute of Aeronautics and AstronauticsSubsystem 3Subsystem 1 Subsystem 2\nSubsystem 4YÕsYÕs\nYÕs\nYÕsX1\nX4X2\nX3Z - system level\nFigure 1: BLISS system structure\nAfter a best guess initialization, the first step in the\nBLISS begins with the system analysis and sensitivityanalysis in which Y and the derivatives of Y withrespect to Z and X are computed. A linear\napproximation to the system objective (an element of\nY) as a function of Z and X is established using theabove derivatives. That approximation is adopted asthe objective function in subdomain optimizations thatfollow next. In each subdomain (module, or black\nbox), the Z and Y variables are frozen and an\nimprovement in the objective function is sought by thelocal optimizations that use local X separately in each\nmodule. The frozen Z and Y are constant parameters in\neach module optimization and the module optimizationis followed by computation of the derivatives of theoptimum with respect to these parameters. The second\nstep achieves improvement through the system-levelvariables Z and is linked to the first step by thederivatives of optimum with respect to parameters Z\nand Y. The derivatives are used to extrapolate each\nsubdomain optimum as a function of Z and Y. Thefunctional relation Y=Y(Z) is approximated byextrapolation based on the system sensitivity analysis.\nThese steps alternate until convergence. A flowchart ofthe method is shown in Figure 2.\nSystem Analysis \nand Update \nVariablesSubsystem1 \nOptimization\nand\nOptm. Senstvty. Anlys.\nini tialize X & Z\nX = X 0 + DXOPT\nZ = Z 0 + DZOPTX = X0 + DXOPT\nZ = Z0 + DZOPTOpportunity for Con-\ncurrent Processing\nSystem \nOptimization\nHuman\nInterventionBLIS S CYCLESensitivity AnalysisStep 1 Step 2\nSubsystem2 \nOptimization\nand\nOptm. Senstvty. Anlys.\nSubsystem3 Optimization\nand\nOptm. Senstvty. Anlys.\nSubsystem4 Optimization\nand\nOptm. Senstvty. Anlys.\nFigure 2: BLISS CycleNote that the output of step 1 is an optimum change in\nthe local design variables, DXOPT, in the presence of\nconstant Z, and the output of step 2 is an optimum\nchange in system design variables, DZOPT.\nIn the original version of BLISS the modules shown\ngenerically in Fig. 2 are Propulsion, Aerodynamics,\nStructures, and Performance whose detailed\ninput/output variables are identified later. The commondenominator of these modules was the extreme\nsimplicity of analyses that employed closed-form\nexpressions for input-to-output mapping. This was so\nbecause of the need to test the overall procedure\norganization and the two-level algorithm convergence at\nthe initial development stage of a new method without\nbeing encumbered by long turn-around times in the\nmodules. The next logical step in the BLISS\ndevelopment is to upgrade the fidelity of the modules\nwhile holding the overall procedure organization\nunchanged.\nUpgrades in the BLISS Structures and\nAerodynamics Modules\nThe modularity of BLISS permits replacing or adding\nblack boxes to refine or alter the optimization and\nanalysis tools in each modules allowing the engineer\nthe flexibility to exercise his judgment. Having tools\nof different level of fidelity in the modules enables\napplications of BLISS in different design phases. The\nadvanced BLISS method incorporates two new modulesthat can be used in lieu of previous black boxes. The\nstructures module now can use the Equivalent\nLaminated Plate Solution (ELAPS, Giles, 1986) and\nthe aerodynamics module can use a code called\nAWAVE (Harris, 1964) to perform wave drag analysis.\nIntegration of ELAPS\nIn the previous application example, BLISS employed\na skin-stringer representation of the internal wing box\nbays. This model broke the wing down into a three\nbay wing box whose geometry varied with the taper\nratio, wing sweep, thickness to chord ratio, wingspan,and aspect ratio, all manipulated as design variables in\nthe system-level optimization. The displacements,e.g., the wing twist, and stresses, were computed using\nsimple, thin-walled box-beam formulas (e.g., Bruhn,\n1965)\nIn the BLISS application shown herein, the level of\naccuracy in this module is raised by substituting the\nprevious model with the Equivalent Laminated Plate 4\nAmerican Institute of Aeronautics and AstronauticsSolution (ELAPS) computer code. This code designed\nwith preliminary design stage calculations in mind iscapable of modeling aircraft wing structures with\nmultiple trapezoidal segments. The wing structure is\nrepresented as a plate whose stiffness is set equivalent\nto that of the original, built-up, structural box of thewing. ELAPS employs a set of displacement functionsdefined over each trapezoidal segment and made\ncompatible in regard to translations and rotations at thesegment junctions. Minimization of the strain energy\nbased on the Ritz method leads to equations from\nwhich to calculate static deflections and internal forces.The latter are then converted to stresses taking into\naccount the details of the wing box built-up cross-\nsection.\nThe accuracy of the results of ELAPS has been found to\nbe somewhat below that of finite element codes (Giles,1986) but the ELAPS input is much simpler and faster\nto develop. The computation time for an ELAPS\nmodel is more than an order of magnitude faster than\nthat of an equivalent finite element model - animportant feature for a tool to be integrated into an\noptimization procedure.\nIntegrated in BLISS, ELAPS receives its input from a\npre-processor routine that generates an input file with\nthe skin thickness, aspect ratio, taper ratio, thickness tochord ratio, sweep, reference area, and aircraft weight.\nThe model used by ELAPS analyzes stress along thesame three bay wingbox configuration used as an\nexample in the original application of BLISS. Each\nwingbox consists of the top and bottom sandwich\npanels of different thicknesses and sandwich webs\nidentical in the front and rear of the wingbox. The\nfront spar of the wing box is located at 10% of thechord length and the rear spar lies at 70% of the chord\nlength. Figure 3 depicts the configuration of theELAPS model used by BLISS.\nxy\n123Wingbox\n0.1 chord\n0.7 chord\nLift applied \nat 0.5 chord\nxy\n123Wingbox\n0.1 chord\n0.7 chord\nLift applied \nat 0.5 chord\n \nFigure 3: Wing ModelThe top and bottom panels as well as the webs have the\nthickness of the sandwich face sheets (t) and the\nsandwich caliper thick ness (t s) as design variables, as\ndepicted in Fig.4. ELAPS models such a built-up\nstructure by representing each face and the core as\nseparate elements linked in a common coordinate grid. \n1\n23\n45\n6L\nh ts2ts1\nts3ts2\nts3\n?t311\n2233\n4455\n66L\nh ts2ts1\nts3ts2\nts3\n?t3\nFigure 4: Wingbox Model\nAs it was done in the original BLISS implementation,\nthe aerodynamic loads are being generated within the\nstructures module in the pre-processor to structural\nanalysis. To calculate the lift loads on the wing, the\npre-processor routine averages spanwise between an\nelliptical lift distribution and a linear distribution thatreflects the wing chord taper. The elliptical and taper\nratio based lift distributions for the wing are each\nnormalized to contain an area of unity as illustrated in\nFigure 5. The averaged, spanwise load distribution is\nmultiplied by the lift required from the wing and\ndistributed chordwise. The chordwise distribution is a\ntypical supersonic one with the center of pressure\nlocated at 50% of the chord. The aerodynamic load\ndistribution would be expected to be calculated by an\naerodynamics module using a higher fidelity analysis,\ne.g., a computational fluid dynamics code. Thus, thepresent aerodynamic loads generation is merely a\nplaceholder for a real aerodynamic loads analysis in a\nfuture BLISS upgrade.\nIn summary, the structural module employs ELAPS to\ncalculate the stresses in the wing box for the given\nconfiguration, lift distribution, and corresponding\nconstraints. It also outputs the wing twist and weight\nand the objective function for the local optimization.\nThe aerodynamics module accepts the output and\nmodels its influence on the aerodynamic response. 5\nAmerican Institute of Aeronautics and AstronauticsLift Distribution\n00.20.40.60.811.21.41.61.8\n0 0.1 0.2 0 . 3 0 .4 0.5 0.6 0 . 7 0 .8 0.9 1Spanwise LocationNormalized Lift\nTaper Shape Elliptical Modified\nFigure 5: ELAPS Lift Distribution\nIntegration of AWAVE\nThe cruise segment of the test case mission is\nsupersonic. The original model (Sobieszczanski-\nSobieski et al, 1998) used an approximation relying onthe span efficiency factor. That approximation was\nreplaced herein with a code, AWAVE, that is a\nstreamlined version of the far-field wave drag program\n(Harris, 1964). There are two versions of the Harris\nwave drag program in common use at LaRC. The\noriginal version, described in the reference, treats lifting\nsurfaces as a series of 3-dimensional solid elements. Amuch faster but slightly less accurate version treats\nlifting surfaces as 2-dimensional panels with finite\nthicknesses. Due to compensating errors at positive\nand negative roll angles of the Mach cutting plane, the\npanel version gives excellent results for wave drag\ncoefficients. The objective of the last (AWAVE) effort\nwas to develop a version of the wave drag program withthe accuracy of the solid element program that is faster\nthan the panel version. The AWAVE code\nimplemented computes the wave drag on the basis of\nthe aircraft cross-section distribution along the\ncenterline, hence it requires data about the entire\nconfiguration geometry to enable the area ruling of\nsupersonic body design.\nSimilarly to the integration of ELAPS, integration of\nAWAVE was accomplished by creating a pre-processor\nto generate the necessary input. The input provides thecurrent designÕs aspect ratio, taper ratio, thickness to\nchord ratio, sweep angle, wing reference area, horizontaltail sweep angle, horizontal tail aspect ratio, and\nhorizontal tail reference area. The pre-processor also\ncreates and places the wing and tail airfoils according tothe design configuration variables. The AWAVE\noutput is the wave drag coefficient to be added to the\nother drag components whose calculation remains thesame as in the original BLISS.Numerical Implementation\nCompared to the original application of BLISS to the\nsupersonic business jet case, incorporation of ELAPS\nand AWAVE in BLISS required some changes to\nconstraints and allocation of the design variables to thesystem and subsystem levels.\nXP={T}\nXA={LHT,LW,LHT}\nXS={ [ t], [ ts]}Propulsion\nAer odynamics\nSt r uct u re s\nRanget/c,h,M,AR W,L,SREF,SHT,AR HT,l\nWFO, WO, NZ, WBE, CDMIN, M<1,hHZ - Variables\nCo nstantsh,M,,ARHT,SHT\nARW,SREF ,L,t/c t/c,SHT ,A RW\nL,SREF,ARHTM, h M, h\nhH,CDMIN ,M<1\nWBEWFO,WO \nNZWT,Q WT,WFL/DSFC\nLESF\nDWE\nR\nT-th rottle\nLHT-tail sweep\nLW-see Figure 1\nLHT-see Fig ure 1\n[t]-thickness array,\nsize 1x9\n[tS]-thickness array,\nsize 1x9\nl-taper ratioD-drag\nESF-eng. scale fact. L-liftN\nZ-max. load fact. \nR-range SFC-spec. fuel cons.Q-wing twist\nW\nE-engi ne w eight\nWF-fuel weight\nWT-total weight ARW- wing aspect ratio\nARHT-tail aspect ratio\nh-altitud eM-Mach # S\nREF-wing surf. area \nSHT-tail surf. area \nt/c-thickness/chordL\nW-w ing sweep\nXY ZXP={T}\nXA={LHT,LW,LHT}\nXS={ [ t], [ ts]}Propulsion\nAer odynamics\nSt r uct u re s\nRanget/c,h,M,AR W,L,SREF,SHT,AR HT,l\nWFO, WO, NZ, WBE, CDMIN, M<1,hHZ - Variables\nCo nstantsh,M,,ARHT,SHT\nARW,SREF ,L,t/c t/c,SHT ,A RW\nL,SREF,ARHTM, h M, h\nhH,CDMIN ,M<1\nWBEWFO,WO \nNZWT,Q WT,WFL/DSFC\nLESF\nDWE\nR\nT-th rottle\nLHT-tail sweep\nLW-see Figure 1\nLHT-see Fig ure 1\n[t]-thickness array,\nsize 1x9\n[tS]-thickness array,\nsize 1x9\nl-taper ratioD-drag\nESF-eng. scale fact. L-liftN\nZ-max. load fact. \nR-range SFC-spec. fuel cons.Q-wing twist\nW\nE-engi ne w eight\nWF-fuel weight\nWT-total weight ARW- wing aspect ratio\nARHT-tail aspect ratio\nh-altitud eM-Mach # S\nREF-wing surf. area \nSHT-tail surf. area \nt/c-thickness/chordL\nW-w ing sweep\nXY Z \nFigure 6: Data Dependencies for Business Jet Model\nIn the original BLISS, the taper ratio was a local\nvariable of the structures module. With the integrationof ELAPS and AWAVE, the taper ratio affects both the\naerodynamics and structures module. While the\naerodynamics module optimization may tend toward a\ntaper ratio to reduce induced drag, the structures modulemay generate a different taper value to reduce stresses.\nTo resolve this trade-off, the taper ratio was raised to a\nsystem variable, capable of influencing both modules.\nFigure 6 shows the current black box and variable\ninteractions.\nIn this model there are nine system-level Z-variables,\neach influencing a minimum of two of the subsystems.The local variables of each subsystem are manipulated\nonly in the optimization local to that subsystem. Thepropulsion module has the throttle as its sole local\nvariable. In the present state of BLISS, the range\nmodule is an exception as it performs no optimization.\nIt only evaluates the Breguet range formula. The\naerodynamics module optimizes the local variables of 6\nAmerican Institute of Aeronautics and Astronauticsthe horizontal tail sweep as well as the variables that\nplace the wing and tail along the fuselage axis. The\nstructural subsystem optimization operates on the\nsandwich face sheet and caliper thicknesses for the wingcover panels and the webs of the three wingbox bays. \nThe ten Y-variables noted in the off-diagonal boxes in\nFigure 6, represent couplings of the black boxes and arecomputed in the system analysis.\nBLISS was originally implemented in MATLAB 5.3.0\nat both the system and subsystem levels. TheMATLAB Optimization Toolbox was used as anoptimizer in the subsystem and system optimizations.In the version of BLISS reported herein, the use of\nMATLAB continued as above with the exception of thestructures and aerodynamics modules that incorporated\nELAPS and AWAVE, both written in FORTRAN 77.\nMATLAB provides a facility to invoke FORTRAN\nfrom a MATLAB code. To exploit that facility, thepreprocessors to both ELAPS and AWAVE were\nwritten in FORTRAN and converted into MEX-Files\nusing the MATLAB mex-function (Appendix). Both\nAWAVE and ELAPS were then directly called from\nwithin the BLISS modules. On the output side,simple post-processing generated outputs in a format\nacceptable to the parts of BLISS that remained being\ncoded in MATLAB for further analysis. Because of the\nMATLAB ability to invoke FORTRAN codes, theBLISS upgrading process may continue by addingFORTRAN-coded modules wherever required while\nretaining the MATLAB core that executes the method\nlogic illustrated by the flowchart in Fig. 1.\nResults\nBLISS iterations terminate when the change in the\naircraft range objective varies less than ten nautical\nmiles. This took seven passes through the flowchart in\nFigure 2. The system-level design variables converged\nwithin the first few passes. Further optimizations\nfocused primarily on the local variables. Most of the\nchanges occurred within the structures module where\nthe new ELAPS-based optimization kept refining thevariables searching for the best solution. The majority\nof the computational time was spent in this module.Table 1 shows the variable progression through the\noptimization process.\nThe table reflects the major trade-offs that occur\nbetween the wing sweep angle, airfoil thickness ratio,\nand the wing aspect ratio, all of which govern the\nstructural weight and drag that, in turn, influence theva r \\ c y c l e 1 2345678\nRange (NM) 1051 4492 3938 3546 3399 2432 2493 2493\nt1 (inner) 2 0.617 1.326 0.944 0.643 0.192 0.192 0.192\nt1 (middle) 2 0.301 0.624 0.637 1.028 0.663 0.663 0.663\nt1 (outer) 2 0.383 0.53 0.322 0.457 0.044 0.044 0.044\nt2 (inner) 2 12 7.449 5.573 3.089 0.012 0.012 0.012\nt2 (middle) 2 12 2.803 0.909 8.864 0.012 0.012 0.012\nt2 (outer) 2 12 0.6 0.012 12 8.115 8.115 8.115\nt3 (inner) 2 0.48 0.729 0.824 0.173 1.075 1.075 1.075\nt3 (middle) 2 1.348 0.562 0.511 0.548 0.517 0.517 0.517\nt3 (outer) 2 0.115 0.267 0.248 0.265 0.012 0.012 0.012\nts1 (inner) 4 0.617 1.325 0.944 1.985 2.205 2.205 2.205\nts1 (middle) 4 0.865 0.624 0.637 1.028 0.663 0.663 0.663\nts1 (outer) 4 0.383 0.53 0.322 0.617 0.233 0.233 0.233\nts2 (inner) 4 24 24 23.17 12.46 3.466 3.466 3.466\nts2 (middle) 4 24 0.464 0.665 23.02 14.31 14.31 14.31\nts2 (outer) 4 24 2.583 1.802 24 2.229 2.229 2.229\nts3 (inner) 4 0.48 0.37 0.677 0.177 1.076 1.076 1.076\nts3 (middle) 4 1.348 0.562 0.511 0.068 0.391 0.391 0.391\nts3 (outer) 4 0.115 0.267 0.248 0.38 0.251 0.251 0.251\nL\nHT (¡) 60 70 70 70 40 40 40 40\nLW (%MAC ) 1 011 2 1 111\nLHT (%MAC) 250 350 350 100 350 100 100 100\nT 0.35 0.319 0.236 0.241 0.255 0.281 0.31 0.31\nt/c 0.05 0.058 0.058 0.058 0.058 0.058 0.058 0.058\nh (ft) 55000 60000 60000 60000 60000 60000 60000 60000\nM 1 . 822 2 2 222\nARW 4 2.5 2.607 2.607 2.607 2.607 2.607 2.607\nLW (¡) 55 40 40.63 40.63 40.63 40.63 40.63 40.63\nSREF (ft2) 400 200 200 200 200 200 200 200\nSHT (ft2) 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150\nARHT 6.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5\nlW 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1\nTable 1: Supersonic Business Jet Results\nrange. Ultimately, influences of these variables on the\nrange differ in sign, therefore, the procedure seeks a\ncompromise. For example, the wing sweep initially\nincreases to approximately 70 degrees and then falls to\n40 while the taper ratio decreases to 0.1. The wing\nreference area rapidly reduces to 200 square feet as the\nwing aspect ratio is brought down first to 2.5 and then\nincreased to 2.607. The wing position is briefly\nchanged in the fourth cycle but quickly returns to its\ninitial value. The wing configuration progression isdepicted in Figure 7. The aircraft finds its optimal\ncruise conditions after the first cycle of Mach 2.0 at\n60,000 feet.\nWing Planform Progression\n02468101214161820\n024681 0 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 2 0 2 2 2 4 2 6 2 8 3 0 3 2 3 4Distance from Wing Leading Edg e (ft)Distance from Centerline (ft)Cycle 1\nCycles 3-8 Cycle 2\nFigure 7: Wing Planform Progression 7\nAmerican Institute of Aeronautics and AstronauticsThe horizontal tail position and geometry stabilize after\nthe main wing variables reach their settling points. Thetail position varies significantly but settles at a value of100 percent of the mean aerodynamic chord. The tail\nsweep ends up almost matching the wing sweep but hasa significantly larger aspect ratio. Further analysis of\nthe tail may involve incorporating an ELAPS model ofthe tail to increase fidelity of analysis in that\ncomponent.\nThe skin thicknesses change throughout the process\nseeking the maximum of the structure contribution to\nthe range under the stress constraints for the given\nconfiguration geometry, the latter governed by the Z-\nvariables. The resulting histogram is seen in Figure 8. \n00.511.522.533.54\n12 34 56 7 8\nBLISS Cycle NumberThickness (in)t3 (inner)\nt3 (middle)\nt3 (outer)\nts3 (inner)\nts3 (mi ddle)\nts3 (outer)ts3\nt3\nFigure 8: Plot of Skin Thickness Variation\nThough the first cycle was able to converge to\nreasonable thicknesses, the second through fifth cycles\nwere unable to satisfy all constraints given the system-level configuration. Then, by the sixth cycle the\noptimizer had found a solution that allowed allconstraints to be met and in the seventh cycle it found\nthe optimal configuration. Figure 9 shows theprogression of the aircraft Take-Off Gross Weight and\nits components of empty weight and fuel.\nFigure 9: Aircraft WeightFigure 10 depicts a histogram of the aircraft range. It\nstarts off at a feasible design point. The cycles two\nthrough five did not lie within the design space, butBLISS returned to the design space and settled on a\nfeasible design with optimized range.\nThe last implementation of BLISS to the supersonic\nbusiness jet test case (Agte, 1999) yielded a range of\n2,189 nautical miles. With the addition of AWAVE\nand ELAPS, the more refined analysis increased the\nrange to 2,493 nautical miles. \nDistribution of elapsed computing time over the BLISS\nmodules is displayed in Table 2. It is evident thatmost of the elapsed time is spent in ELAPS but that\nwould change drastically if a CFD-level analysis were\nused in the aerodynamics module. If BLISS were\ngrown to the point where all the major modules would\nconsume about equal amount of the elapsed time, then\ndistributed execution on concurrently operatingmachines (or processors within a multiprocessor\nmachine) would radically compress the elapsed time of\nthe entire BLISS execution.\nBLISS ELAPS AWAVE\nPercent of Time 8.36% 89.78% 1.87%\nTable 2: Processor Time Use\nThe next step in the BLISS development is to\nincorporate additional modules to increase the analysis\nfidelity. The largest refinement would be expected\nfrom adding a computational fluid dynamics code to\nperform the aerodynamic analysis, including the loads.\nThe propulsion data quality would benefit from\nreplacing the current response surface fitted to a look-uptable with a comprehensive engine analysis. Also, the\nsimple Breguet formula for the aircraft range would\nneed to be replaced by a complete performance analysis \nConclusions and Remarks\nIntegration of ELAPS and AWAVE into BLISS\ndemonstrated the modular nature of the method and its\nability to accommodate refinements. Used in a limited\ntest case of a supersonic business jet design, the two-\nlevel optimization in BLISS was effective in satisfying\nthe system-level and local constraints while attaining asystem-level objective within a reasonable number of\niterations. Separation of the system-level designvariables from the local ones enabled optimization for asystem-level objective while providing autonomy of thedesign decision and tool choice within disciplines\nrepresented in the modules.Aircr aft Total and Em pty Weight\n12 0 0 014 0 0 016 0 0 018 0 0 020 0 0 022 0 0 024 0 0 026 0 0 028 0 0 030 0 0 0\n123 456 78BLISS C ycle Numbe rWeight (lb)Total Weight\nEmpty WeightFuel Weight 8\nAmerican Institute of Aeronautics and AstronauticsThe method is open to further upgrades in terms of the\nfidelity of analysis and optimization t echniques\nemployed in the modules. In this regard, it is up to theuser to decide on the variety of tools to be integrated inBLISS as needed by the multidisciplinary optimizationtask at hand.\nFurther advancement of BLISS from its present status\nof a method concept demonstrator to a tool useful inactual applications calls for inserting a CFD code in theaerodynamics module, adding a comprehensive engine\nanalysis to the propulsion module, and extending theperformance analysis module to include more than just\nthe cruise phase of a mission.\nFinally, as the increased fidelity of analyses in the\nmodules will exact its price in terms of the computing\nelapsed time, concurrent execution of the modular\nanalyses and optimizations will become an attractive\noption. \nAcknowledgement\nMichael Parks of the George Washington University\nJIAFS program provided critical help with MATLAB\nrefinements and FORTRAN integration. His\ncontributions were gratefully appreciated.\nReferences\nAgte, J.; Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J.; and Sandusky,\nR.: ÒSupersonic Business Jet Design Through Bi-Level\nIntegrated System Synthesis,Ó 1999 World Aviation\nConference, SAE 1999-01-5622.\nAIAA/UTC/Pratt & Whitney Undergraduate Individual\nAircraft Design Competition, ÒSupersonic Cruise\nBusiness Jet RFP.Ó 1995/1996.\nBloebaum, C. L.; Hajela, P.; and Sobieszczanski-\nSobieski, J.: ÒNon-Hierarchic System decomposition inStructural Optimization; Engineering Optimization,Ó19, pp 171-186, 1992.\nBraun, R. D., and Kroo, I.M.: ÒDevelopment and\nApplications of the Collaborative OptimizationArchitecture in a Multidisciplinary Design\nEnvironment,Ó SIAM Journal on Optimization,Alexandrov, N, and Hussaini, M. Y., (eds), 1996.\nBruhn, E. F.: ÒAnalysis and Design of Flight Vehicle\nStructures,Ó Tri-State Offset Co., 1965.Giles, G. L.: ÒEquivalent Plate Analysis of Air craft\nWing Box Structures with General Planform\nGeometry,Ó NASA TM-87697, March 1986.\nHarris, R. V.: ÒAn Analysis and Correlation of Air craft\nWave Drag,Ó NASA TMX-947, March 1964.\niSIGHT Designers and Developers Manual, Version\n3.1, Engineous Software Inc., Morrisville, North\nCarolina, 1998.\nMATLAB Manual, the MathWorks, Inc., July 1993,\nVersion 5.0, 1997, and MATLAB Optimization\nToolbox, UserÕs Guide, 1996.\nRaymer, D. P.: Aircraft Design: A Conceptual\nApproach , AIAA Education Series, 1992.\nSobieszczanski-Sobieski, J.: ÒOptimization by\nDecomposition: A Step from Hierarchic to Non-\nhierarchic Systems,Ó 2\nnd NASA/AF Symposium on\nRecent Advances in Multidisciplinary Analysis and\nOptimization; Hampton; Virginia, Sept. 1988; NASACP-3031, pp.51-78; also in NASA TM 101494.\nSobieszczanski-Sobieski, J.; Agte, J.; and Sandusky,\nR.: ÒBi-Level Integrated System Synthesis,Ó Proc. 7\nth\nAIAA/USA/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on\nMultidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, AIAA\nPaper No. 98-4916. Also NASA TM-1998-208715,\nSept. 1998a; (to appear in AIAA J. Jan. 2000)\nSobieszczanski-Sobieski, J.; Agte, J.; and Sandusky,\nR.: ÒBi-Level Integrated System Synthesis (BLISS)Ó,\nNASA/TM-1998-208715, August 1998b.\nWujek, B. A.; Renaud, J.E.; Batill, S. M.; and\nBrockman, J.B.: ÒConcurrent Subspace Optimization\nusing Design Variable Sharing in a Distributed DesignEnvironment,Ó Azarm, S. (ed), Proc. DesignEngineering Technical Conf., Advances in Design\nAutomation, ASME DE Vol. 82, pp.181-188, 1995.\nAppendix\nThere are a few steps required for integrating a\nFORTRAN code into the MATLAB environment that\nBLISS is currently programmed in. The user must\nlocate the place in BLISS where a c all is made to\nanalysis that is to be replaced. Then he must ex amine\nthe input and output of the new and old analysis to\nensure that the remainder of BLISS is capable of\nsupplying input the new analysis requires and that the\nnew analysis produces all the output expected. Then a 9\nAmerican Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics pre-processor routine must be created to present the\nvariable information to the FORTRAN code in an\nappropriate format. Finally the data must be harvested\nand returned to the MATLAB module from which the\nFORTRAN code is being called in a format compatiblewith MATLAB. \nPre-processing\nIn pre-processing, BL ISS must pass the needed\nvariables to a routine which will manipulate them into\na form that the FORTRAN code will accept. The\nprogrammer must first ensure that the module in which\nhe is pre-processing has access to the required variables\n(i.e., the subsystem must not be using X variables\nassigned to other subsystems). \nThe two FORTRAN codes integrated required\nformatted text input files. The easiest way to prepare\nthese files was to use a FORTRAN subroutine to take\nthe design variables, configure them in the way needed\nto represent the geometry or conditions needed by the\nanalysis, and write the formatted input file for analysis. \nIn order to pass variables from the MATLAB\nenvironment to the FORTRAN pre-processing\nsubroutine, MATLABÕs mex-function was invoked. Inthis function, a standard gateway subroutine is added tothe FORTRAN pre-processing subroutine. This new\nroutine collects an array of variables passed in from\nMATLAB and assigns them to a FORTRAN array.\nThe gateway routine sends these variables into the pre-\nprocessing subroutine. \nIn MATLAB, the user compiles the FORTRAN code\nincluding the gateway routine and the pre-processing\nroutine using the mex command. This creates a mex-\nfile which is treated as a MATLAB function requiring\nan input array and an output array. The user then places\nhis variables for the pre-processing function into an\narray and puts this array into the new mex-file. This\nsends the variables to the gateway routine which\nassigns them to the variables used in the FORTRAN\npre-processing subroutine. The input file is generated\nand control returns to MATLAB.\nProgram Insertion\nHaving prepared the data for analysis by the program,\nthe programmer must locate the section of BLISS that\nhe wishes to upgrade. The previous analysis must beremoved and the code must be placed such that BLISS\nwill have performed the new analysis and have data\nready for later analysis that the user is not replacing. Having located the desired calling spot and removed the\nreplaced analysis, the user simply calls the program\nfrom within BLISS. By previously compiling the\nFORTRAN code in question, the user calls the program\nby typing !program_name in the BLISS code where\nprogram_name is the command that runs the program\nfrom the operating system. The program then processesthe prepared input file and returns to BLISS.\nData Collection\nThe final step that the programmer must perform in\norder for BLISS to carry on its optimization is\nharvesting the data produced by the new program.\nELAPS and AWAVE both created output files with\ndata required for BLISS. There are two basic ways to\ncollect data produced by FORTRAN codes.\nThe first way is to use a post-processing technique\nsimilar to that of pre-processing. The user would create\na search algorithm to locate and collect the data from\nthe output file. This in turn would be harvested by\nusing the mex-function to create a gateway between the\nFORTRAN data collection routine and the BLISS\nvariables. The programmer would compile the mex-\nfunction gateway routine combined with his data\ncollection routine, run the new mex-file with an array\nprepared to collect the output of the routine, and extract\nhis data to the array. The programmer would then need\nto assign the array variables to the proper variables in\nthe BLISS code. This technique would be best for\ncases where the user did not have access to the source\ncode of the FORTRAN program.\nIn cases where the programmer does have the\nFORTRAN programÕs source code and a fair knowledgeof how the program works, he can edit the code to\noutput the needed results in a format compatible with\nMATLAB. If the user can locate the sections of code\nthat write out the results to the output file, they canchange the code to output to a file with a .m extension.Files in this format are recognized as MATLAB\nprograms that can be called without FORTRAN\ninteraction. By creating .m files with MATLAB\nvariable assignments corresponding to the data that theuser wishes to collect, the programmer simply runs\nthese MATLAB files after completion of the main\nprogram call and the output is already in MATLAB\nformat. This avoids unnecessary data file searching andreduces MATLAB-FORTRAN interaction. After the\ndata are collected and assigned to the proper variables inBLISS, the analysis would then continue as normal."
} |
[
-0.028848793357610703,
0.04821978509426117,
0.09077809751033783,
0.02309626340866089,
0.06579484045505524,
0.008432156406342983,
0.022581981495022774,
0.022183991968631744,
-0.014824971556663513,
0.09088438749313354,
0.030082494020462036,
0.024071939289569855,
-0.01555517129600048,
-0.0641605406999588,
0.012786446139216423,
0.03373175486922264,
0.015214408747851849,
-0.07136420905590057,
-0.10205764323472977,
0.08007893711328506,
0.09995108097791672,
0.05136547237634659,
-0.08077132701873779,
-0.018964780494570732,
0.03013169765472412,
0.053238268941640854,
-0.029550889506936073,
-0.0037983881775289774,
-0.03329507261514664,
-0.058668483048677444,
0.09695105254650116,
-0.08821582049131393,
-0.019801000133156776,
0.005993570666760206,
0.01993015594780445,
0.019139684736728668,
0.041317567229270935,
-0.011701541021466255,
-0.06829997897148132,
0.03772490471601486,
-0.0015532533871009946,
-0.015519103966653347,
0.028877506032586098,
-0.04933682456612587,
-0.04052260145545006,
-0.011298221535980701,
-0.025576941668987274,
-0.021049702540040016,
-0.034920841455459595,
-0.01454116404056549,
0.05735265836119652,
0.02832271344959736,
-0.05347539484500885,
-0.059478167444467545,
-0.009441678412258625,
0.012655021622776985,
0.06468575447797775,
-0.02434711717069149,
-0.002132766181603074,
-0.022398291155695915,
-0.005317972041666508,
-0.0233790073543787,
0.026077449321746826,
0.047430381178855896,
-0.010128895752131939,
-0.02471875213086605,
0.06898104399442673,
-0.07012057304382324,
-0.07587913423776627,
-0.04626854136586189,
0.05725455284118652,
-0.041554614901542664,
0.034205932170152664,
-0.0018319778610020876,
0.0556769073009491,
0.06466072797775269,
0.0614413321018219,
0.13317184150218964,
0.11759147047996521,
-0.04528065025806427,
0.017089078202843666,
0.0013220995897427201,
0.02566806599497795,
-0.06692728400230408,
-0.01258181594312191,
0.04098916053771973,
-0.012288886122405529,
-0.006986238528043032,
0.11070384085178375,
0.06594638526439667,
0.06152740493416786,
-0.11084973067045212,
0.1031653881072998,
-0.002298675011843443,
0.09244173765182495,
0.024845100939273834,
-0.011628691107034683,
-0.06804777681827545,
-0.06587623059749603,
0.04084281250834465,
-0.026177236810326576,
0.01145485695451498,
-0.06499511748552322,
-0.04248335584998131,
0.07571141421794891,
-0.05394743010401726,
-0.027701247483491898,
-0.0474599152803421,
0.039869360625743866,
0.013023875653743744,
0.019011924043297768,
-0.016887979581952095,
0.07789775729179382,
-0.0631711557507515,
0.002932072849944234,
-0.012759402394294739,
-0.10565049946308136,
0.0008111122297123075,
0.10276146978139877,
-0.06448964029550552,
-0.005462329369038343,
-0.049565691500902176,
-0.0035306881181895733,
0.009308642707765102,
0.06629905104637146,
0.007066057529300451,
-0.014511428773403168,
2.9488614751911066e-33,
0.0331168994307518,
0.0006691609742119908,
-0.028736591339111328,
-0.07328794151544571,
0.09319119155406952,
-0.014677773229777813,
-0.04511662572622299,
-0.05281706154346466,
-0.002189274877309799,
-0.05591827630996704,
-0.021424084901809692,
0.04179271310567856,
0.09695078432559967,
0.06713122129440308,
-0.08435694873332977,
-0.03786727413535118,
0.00040904723573476076,
0.05008266866207123,
-0.05307348817586899,
0.0008283122442662716,
0.06522959470748901,
-0.058587148785591125,
0.013901881873607635,
-0.026848282665014267,
-0.012728911824524403,
0.04670657962560654,
-0.04709957167506218,
0.048155054450035095,
0.0023444630205631256,
0.003919786773622036,
-0.017519226297736168,
-0.024562254548072815,
0.057159747928380966,
-0.0029141337145119905,
0.002620010171085596,
-0.07640286535024643,
0.014602377079427242,
-0.03542430326342583,
0.0054353149607777596,
-0.10186505317687988,
0.02973317541182041,
0.06292220205068588,
-0.040293045341968536,
0.11442597955465317,
0.007279886398464441,
-0.0917319804430008,
0.08513355255126953,
0.02619892731308937,
0.01313475426286459,
0.028537271544337273,
-0.028489630669355392,
0.018493762239813805,
0.01856304705142975,
-0.06942466646432877,
-0.06070258840918541,
-0.036697205156087875,
-0.0044448827393352985,
0.02789817750453949,
0.10183537006378174,
-0.13118958473205566,
0.07021540403366089,
0.0827048271894455,
0.04848833009600639,
-0.037703756242990494,
0.010313921608030796,
-0.03476874902844429,
0.049177221953868866,
0.025808153674006462,
0.07583218812942505,
-0.07996677607297897,
0.05530351772904396,
-0.043041542172431946,
0.057429250329732895,
0.022655701264739037,
-0.02359706535935402,
-0.03780198469758034,
0.04338725283741951,
0.02204143814742565,
0.02881367690861225,
-0.021363824605941772,
-0.047285452485084534,
-0.02479335479438305,
0.03607647120952606,
0.04128410294651985,
0.0743054449558258,
-0.024510039016604424,
-0.06251306086778641,
0.03982266038656235,
0.001703886198811233,
-0.015458553098142147,
0.022089501842856407,
0.007414654828608036,
0.004635476041585207,
-0.002318740589544177,
0.05175364762544632,
-3.6969014480032776e-33,
0.034827154129743576,
0.0010178869124501944,
-0.016928208991885185,
-0.040903639048337936,
0.026871733367443085,
-0.022274715825915337,
0.020895669236779213,
-0.07330168038606644,
0.022349011152982712,
-0.08399012684822083,
-0.09090399742126465,
-0.0073936195112764835,
0.0793515220284462,
-0.03028242476284504,
0.04560566321015358,
-0.07166260480880737,
-0.03791055083274841,
0.031270869076251984,
-0.013738943263888359,
-0.0006600894848816097,
0.0006203192169778049,
-0.007085410412400961,
0.008782222867012024,
0.06606899201869965,
0.027407733723521233,
0.01984989643096924,
-0.012893719598650932,
-0.015040094032883644,
-0.06128738075494766,
-0.07899396121501923,
-0.005183827597647905,
-0.0026247412897646427,
-0.06815923750400543,
0.08792729675769806,
-0.05659927427768707,
-0.023397602140903473,
0.09302369505167007,
-0.039757292717695236,
-0.08735582232475281,
-0.03487207740545273,
0.09939320385456085,
0.030513208359479904,
0.04473281651735306,
0.040899746119976044,
-0.018681379035115242,
0.056100089102983475,
0.036482907831668854,
-0.004373372066766024,
-0.03430342301726341,
0.021238569170236588,
-0.09176687896251678,
-0.0038167329039424658,
-0.00818206649273634,
0.08089988678693771,
-0.0004170317843090743,
-0.004445721860975027,
0.07164788246154785,
-0.06137184798717499,
-0.05471698194742203,
0.01996065303683281,
-0.012375904247164726,
0.02483075112104416,
0.03731410205364227,
0.008583285845816135,
0.019178660586476326,
0.04359510913491249,
-0.07730142772197723,
-0.07816201448440552,
-0.007900306954979897,
-0.09777861833572388,
0.016298808157444,
-0.1155942752957344,
-0.07245945185422897,
-0.0296519473195076,
0.09070736169815063,
0.02493138052523136,
0.027944236993789673,
-0.0452023483812809,
-0.08842147886753082,
-0.002894036937505007,
-0.05636493116617203,
-0.03447333723306656,
-0.10662643611431122,
0.011970799416303635,
-0.010929422453045845,
0.021015336737036705,
0.06740892678499222,
-0.11711126565933228,
-0.004928171634674072,
0.07653714716434479,
-0.06097353249788284,
-0.003290178021416068,
0.031724296510219574,
0.09177012741565704,
-0.022327423095703125,
-5.4178833863716136e-8,
0.03077402152121067,
0.03843265399336815,
0.051545653492212296,
0.002731547923758626,
0.1266297847032547,
-0.07030807435512543,
-0.02600589580833912,
-0.01846093311905861,
-0.0509507954120636,
-0.023035597056150436,
0.06150203198194504,
0.05032874271273613,
0.03369741886854172,
-0.012932884506881237,
0.05989347770810127,
-0.056831855326890945,
0.00938511174172163,
-0.049229852855205536,
-0.05833704024553299,
0.02256128005683422,
0.0012254778994247317,
-0.020960859954357147,
0.024820098653435707,
-0.0399637296795845,
0.09331785142421722,
0.048588480800390244,
0.018585817888379097,
0.08926776051521301,
-0.0047921002842485905,
0.04033361375331879,
-0.061724379658699036,
0.03741190582513809,
-0.0904088169336319,
0.03272821754217148,
-0.07280918955802917,
-0.034474726766347885,
0.046863120049238205,
0.01971893385052681,
-0.0022693348582834005,
-0.014646009542047977,
0.004664787091314793,
0.003374807070940733,
0.07725489884614944,
0.030317198485136032,
-0.006780528929084539,
0.04703166335821152,
-0.09184035658836365,
-0.05079866200685501,
0.026426982134580612,
-0.11666915565729141,
-0.02668621949851513,
-0.049186866730451584,
-0.005177065264433622,
0.03106398694217205,
0.013629850931465626,
-0.07905303686857224,
-0.028883082792162895,
-0.0361412949860096,
0.06006598472595215,
0.05915522202849388,
0.0600229874253273,
-0.03171255439519882,
-0.02446080558001995,
-0.04862085357308388
] | {
"pdf_file": "CIVXOLLIUSCCM6HCT63TQ4R4563YJHRL.pdf",
"text": " \n EO 08-15 \nTO ALL TO WHOM THESE PR ESENTS COME -- GREETINGS: \n \n \nEXECUTIVE ORDER TO PROVIDE FUNDING, AS AUTHORIZED BY ARK. \nCODE ANN. §§ 12-75-114, AS AM ENDED, FROM THE GOVERNOR’S \nDISASTER FUND, EMERGENCY RESPONSE FUND \n \n WHEREAS: The impact of the predicted landf all of Hurricane Gustav has created an \nemergency situation, beginning Augus t 29, 2008, and continuing, and is \nanticipated to result in the emergency evacuation of residents in affected \nsurrounding States into Arkansas, w ith such severity that action is \nwarranted to alleviate hardship and suffering from this emergency \nevacuation; and \n WHEREAS: Adverse circumstances have b een brought to bear on the citizens and \npublic areas within these jurisdictions; and \n WHEREAS: These political subdi visions require supplemental assistance from the State \nto help recover from their enormous losses; \n NOW, THEREFORE, I, MIKE BEEBE, Gover nor of the State of Arkansas, acting under \nthe authority vested in me by Ark. Code Ann. § 12-75-101, et seq. , do \nhereby amend Executive Order EO 08-14, dated August 29, 2008, to add \nan additional amount of $300,000.00 from the Emergency Response Fund of the Governor’s Disaster Fund to be used at the discretion of the \nDirector, Arkansas Department of Em ergency Management, to defray both \nprogram and administrative costs. \n IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Great Seal of the \nState of Arkansas to be affixed at th e Capitol in Little Rock on the 2nd day \nof September, in the Year of our Lord 2008. \n \nORIGINAL SIGNED \n \n MIKE BEEBE, GOVERNOR \n \n \n \n ORIGINAL SIGNED \n CHARLIE DANIELS, SECRETARY OF STATE \n "
} |
[
-0.11883839964866638,
0.04829868674278259,
-0.0025480559561401606,
-0.011011209338903427,
0.05195074528455734,
0.010291832499206066,
0.1154332384467125,
0.0007007909007370472,
-0.08592535555362701,
-0.07065396010875702,
0.0013317164266481996,
-0.035472381860017776,
0.018434155732393265,
-0.006737178191542625,
0.024402987211942673,
-0.029503243044018745,
-0.058138374239206314,
-0.05043954402208328,
-0.020765526220202446,
0.029036032035946846,
-0.06367600709199905,
0.024029914289712906,
0.0262432973831892,
-0.006037362851202488,
-0.011076544411480427,
-0.0014006864512339234,
-0.018619801849126816,
0.03277004510164261,
0.0028860096354037523,
-0.05694391578435898,
-0.04394163936376572,
0.025414075702428818,
0.08790954202413559,
-0.02499123103916645,
-0.03668315336108208,
0.0062413448467850685,
-0.06646791845560074,
-0.0671444833278656,
0.020564241334795952,
0.04238877445459366,
0.021880215033888817,
-0.04288247600197792,
-0.03437700495123863,
0.06146686151623726,
0.0656372681260109,
-0.0785202905535698,
0.029487011954188347,
0.010798297822475433,
0.06332410126924515,
-0.04508465901017189,
-0.01823394186794758,
-0.027721041813492775,
-0.0036737609189003706,
-0.03659451752901077,
0.054250262677669525,
-0.02085655927658081,
0.015034922398626804,
-0.060095224529504776,
0.016393909230828285,
-0.03323858231306076,
0.01750349812209606,
-0.0005952207720838487,
-0.16348379850387573,
0.08492093533277512,
-0.07583844661712646,
0.0161097701638937,
0.048382941633462906,
-0.007598146330565214,
-0.024985475465655327,
0.05949747934937477,
0.0658901110291481,
-0.03513742983341217,
0.0008843158720992506,
-0.11567969620227814,
0.049390342086553574,
0.03360460326075554,
0.055154237896203995,
0.026383694261312485,
0.053694359958171844,
0.038932498544454575,
0.0004393816343508661,
0.0180604699999094,
-0.09288253635168076,
-0.004073987249284983,
-0.0008234609267674387,
-0.04883106052875519,
-0.006677441764622927,
-0.023541681468486786,
-0.03813307359814644,
0.05245159938931465,
-0.042493823915719986,
-0.055899728089571,
0.08681583404541016,
-0.04896170645952225,
-0.08339672535657883,
-0.0457635223865509,
0.029042238369584084,
0.03465776517987251,
-0.08649188280105591,
0.4062184691429138,
0.03594949096441269,
0.018697189167141914,
0.0979783833026886,
-0.007865204475820065,
0.023714108392596245,
-0.05756505951285362,
-0.06109985336661339,
-0.006620500702410936,
0.007060033269226551,
0.021669859066605568,
-0.024405108764767647,
-0.033514637500047684,
0.00025015627034008503,
0.03170765936374664,
0.04407161846756935,
0.09463243186473846,
-0.035580113530159,
-0.0045343064703047276,
0.043714847415685654,
0.00020504710846580565,
-0.002858717693015933,
-0.024884076789021492,
0.0037606365513056517,
0.014041258953511715,
0.07781578600406647,
-0.1323145031929016,
0.0068764761090278625,
-7.2201250750405e-33,
0.007334581576287746,
0.002726183971390128,
0.012147537432610989,
-0.002440247917547822,
0.027932560071349144,
0.03927065059542656,
0.003743888111785054,
-0.04643532633781433,
-0.014492551796138287,
0.05360198765993118,
0.006590632256120443,
0.03664784133434296,
-0.023135676980018616,
0.03275369852781296,
0.07811082899570465,
0.009627518244087696,
0.007964123040437698,
0.0028742437716573477,
-0.0018807238666340709,
0.004691542126238346,
-0.012402275577187538,
-0.0008041393011808395,
-0.023038707673549652,
0.04297299310564995,
-0.028259985148906708,
-0.06694644689559937,
0.038539037108421326,
-0.07085712999105453,
0.020109260454773903,
0.001460324041545391,
0.0014639950823038816,
0.049912355840206146,
-0.02594558522105217,
0.0008223677286878228,
-0.03757276013493538,
-0.028740663081407547,
0.03337514027953148,
-0.07462829351425171,
-0.035983964800834656,
0.025680823251605034,
-0.050139084458351135,
0.010837196372449398,
-0.04243791848421097,
-0.002668545348569751,
-0.004916265141218901,
0.16647927463054657,
-0.0011541391722857952,
-0.004960660357028246,
-0.06482207775115967,
0.06976216286420822,
-0.0028182310052216053,
-0.02132517658174038,
-0.11613703519105911,
0.04333868995308876,
-0.0033509607892483473,
-0.020106570795178413,
0.016554009169340134,
-0.043971188366413116,
0.020619438961148262,
-0.009089959785342216,
0.009713641367852688,
0.039391469210386276,
-0.012487754225730896,
0.009350251406431198,
-0.08647788316011429,
-0.04851773753762245,
0.02447775937616825,
-0.008494960144162178,
0.023063570261001587,
-0.012638214975595474,
-0.05100997909903526,
0.03675990551710129,
0.03771744668483734,
0.030916057527065277,
-0.028798431158065796,
-0.01926880143582821,
-0.019831717014312744,
0.03583517670631409,
0.08063048869371414,
0.00649732630699873,
0.03545527532696724,
-0.041958946734666824,
0.006693818140774965,
-0.024078864604234695,
0.09502369910478592,
0.054634999483823776,
0.004220988135784864,
-0.05180729925632477,
0.01021517813205719,
-0.041098661720752716,
-0.03574559465050697,
0.06131820008158684,
-0.0030944310128688812,
0.08796171098947525,
0.006000818684697151,
4.4925641867161134e-33,
-0.07716735452413559,
0.01899317093193531,
-0.03573813661932945,
0.0887979194521904,
-0.01755509153008461,
-0.0027626880910247564,
0.037273939698934555,
0.09013677388429642,
-0.09250447154045105,
0.0680299699306488,
0.022390201687812805,
-0.045089662075042725,
0.030878892168402672,
0.044495198875665665,
-0.005799654871225357,
0.03523358702659607,
0.06968843936920166,
-0.004063474480062723,
-0.028155116364359856,
-0.03572935611009598,
-0.030507177114486694,
-0.03237851336598396,
-0.0024998304434120655,
0.034929435700178146,
-0.04148077219724655,
0.030205287039279938,
0.04858911409974098,
0.0632987916469574,
-0.021693143993616104,
0.036800533533096313,
0.03896567225456238,
-0.023581488057971,
-0.05063262954354286,
-0.05820295587182045,
0.04826247692108154,
0.08404397964477539,
0.03678114339709282,
-0.0007768925279378891,
0.024848245084285736,
-0.05051735043525696,
0.039668887853622437,
-0.010082785040140152,
0.002244437113404274,
0.11697717010974884,
-0.021961307153105736,
-0.005805923603475094,
-0.048092879354953766,
0.003788944333791733,
0.035172659903764725,
0.07729728519916534,
-0.09319712221622467,
-0.011992926709353924,
-0.021968109533190727,
0.04129430651664734,
-0.022958293557167053,
0.004160518292337656,
-0.0432187058031559,
0.0702132061123848,
-0.01905948668718338,
0.0004752702370751649,
0.005480603780597448,
0.026761434972286224,
-0.033612821251153946,
0.01346849836409092,
-0.022746674716472626,
0.03873894736170769,
-0.024523282423615456,
-0.03632815554738045,
-0.0017924589337781072,
-0.052569907158613205,
0.006689464673399925,
-0.025846485048532486,
-0.1348353624343872,
0.0011394252069294453,
-0.047169335186481476,
-0.05347497761249542,
-0.018427148461341858,
-0.007304163184016943,
-0.009657083079218864,
-0.037726134061813354,
-0.033999841660261154,
0.01841733604669571,
-0.008003143593668938,
-0.005512353032827377,
-0.03353199362754822,
-0.0201805979013443,
0.021665804088115692,
0.01075822301208973,
-0.05747472122311592,
0.01969684660434723,
-0.007240809965878725,
0.023037107661366463,
0.12023406475782394,
0.0032419958151876926,
0.010150063782930374,
-1.3403668397415913e-8,
-0.046724583953619,
0.04062063992023468,
-0.05561641603708267,
-0.0018853341462090611,
0.056323979049921036,
0.049638908356428146,
-0.04154156893491745,
0.0325038842856884,
0.02574923262000084,
-0.018780937418341637,
0.06920813769102097,
0.02598794549703598,
-0.02782331220805645,
0.05757509544491768,
0.09128093719482422,
-0.01532574463635683,
-0.10472093522548676,
-0.027585938572883606,
-0.016222817823290825,
-0.035399287939071655,
-0.010461363941431046,
-0.013999390415847301,
-0.0002939800324384123,
-0.08362972736358643,
0.007932317443192005,
0.006960071157664061,
-0.04422977939248085,
0.07475824654102325,
0.07440952211618423,
-0.04058071970939636,
-0.0018266832921653986,
0.01985001191496849,
0.014382191933691502,
0.020585300400853157,
0.02213379554450512,
-0.06437048316001892,
-0.06369856745004654,
0.01613914780318737,
0.009907381609082222,
-0.0055595203302800655,
-0.05467313155531883,
-0.0233115516602993,
0.07046928256750107,
0.006468005012720823,
-0.047700025141239166,
-0.0036470729392021894,
0.007837599143385887,
-0.004974569659680128,
-0.01241857185959816,
-0.07781214267015457,
-0.0009409073390997946,
-0.008002524264156818,
0.006034235469996929,
0.08434933423995972,
0.10730371624231339,
0.011427774094045162,
0.013366665691137314,
-0.012747352942824364,
0.061454374343156815,
0.03564131259918213,
0.1587459295988083,
0.12640950083732605,
0.04654904082417488,
-0.015717294067144394
] | {
"pdf_file": "H75CHMEGQV5GB7Y4YQS4OYSBCPHUFFBY.pdf",
"text": " "
} |
[
-0.12087947130203247,
0.0636519193649292,
0.008167694322764874,
-0.07931879907846451,
-0.08506424725055695,
-0.012609004974365234,
-0.028887029737234116,
0.0490591786801815,
-0.030668461695313454,
0.04989027604460716,
0.057460661977529526,
0.04282002151012421,
-0.01962878555059433,
-0.004186212085187435,
-0.015652041882276535,
0.004702747333794832,
-0.012210153974592686,
0.03914365917444229,
-0.02949037030339241,
0.09272269904613495,
0.15603545308113098,
0.05588102713227272,
-0.08814025670289993,
-0.0011312736896798015,
0.08959759026765823,
-0.03835358843207359,
-0.10771200805902481,
0.042123906314373016,
0.03176691755652428,
0.0296991728246212,
-0.003257209435105324,
0.027232035994529724,
-0.05407189577817917,
0.009555318392813206,
0.10070588439702988,
0.0069147213362157345,
0.02192547917366028,
-0.06997056305408478,
0.07637082785367966,
0.0463259331882,
-0.06256688386201859,
-0.008490925654768944,
-0.048719651997089386,
-0.00562034547328949,
-0.01133472565561533,
-0.04068555682897568,
0.041309844702482224,
0.007234047632664442,
-0.09309737384319305,
0.05351646989583969,
0.07353521138429642,
0.13375799357891083,
-0.0006862409645691514,
0.09312266111373901,
0.004246409051120281,
-0.050442758947610855,
0.03967299684882164,
-0.014943573623895645,
-0.008712992072105408,
0.030189426615834236,
-0.002747799502685666,
-0.053880684077739716,
-0.034484125673770905,
-0.04219686612486839,
0.0020291199907660484,
-0.012590279802680016,
0.009603475220501423,
-0.04684180021286011,
-0.10376302897930145,
-0.02437187358736992,
-0.0022242593113332987,
-0.039404790848493576,
-0.019397661089897156,
-0.01472868025302887,
0.003084863070398569,
0.011101429350674152,
0.003286198014393449,
0.1135362982749939,
-0.06611205637454987,
-0.1967695951461792,
0.021926894783973694,
0.058289192616939545,
0.08015039563179016,
-0.06957978010177612,
0.012683835811913013,
-0.03347533196210861,
-0.002704160986468196,
0.038514893501996994,
0.17325729131698608,
0.07985790073871613,
0.025893744081258774,
-0.08617698401212692,
0.05346554517745972,
0.005114587023854256,
0.04763862118124962,
-0.05933523550629616,
0.03168560191988945,
-0.0865747258067131,
0.081766277551651,
0.04495330899953842,
0.03234879672527313,
-0.02501264587044716,
-0.09757903218269348,
-0.05685288459062576,
0.01388861145824194,
0.021336007863283157,
-0.017236728221178055,
0.11797916144132614,
-0.011097664013504982,
-0.0177200585603714,
-0.06071595847606659,
0.01047601643949747,
0.08297532051801682,
-0.06004135683178902,
-0.020481152459979057,
-0.03170748054981232,
-0.006190286949276924,
0.016002705320715904,
0.08911734819412231,
-0.07372180372476578,
0.06876470893621445,
0.04266950488090515,
-0.03637397661805153,
-0.0442601703107357,
0.010036258958280087,
-0.004224900621920824,
0.03091477043926716,
2.0970791668020762e-33,
-0.041314754635095596,
0.013896519318223,
-0.04299890622496605,
-0.026999030262231827,
-0.0084223048761487,
0.07285309582948685,
-0.007862159982323647,
0.08465477079153061,
0.007600125391036272,
-0.01258695125579834,
0.002247479511424899,
0.04494788497686386,
-0.015719342976808548,
-0.08373623341321945,
-0.0021529702935367823,
0.02780681848526001,
-0.05247589945793152,
0.02295398712158203,
0.06187010183930397,
-0.03210630267858505,
0.024273715913295746,
-0.06403625756502151,
0.035738684237003326,
0.02645811066031456,
-0.03176421672105789,
0.01670675352215767,
-0.08690553158521652,
-0.032543864101171494,
-0.04836041107773781,
0.03171398490667343,
0.0875018909573555,
0.030851313844323158,
0.10501251369714737,
-0.022407321259379387,
0.0459163561463356,
-0.017025405541062355,
0.03482966125011444,
0.004109061788767576,
-0.014836243353784084,
-0.0401180274784565,
0.08254218101501465,
0.04653951898217201,
0.05470075085759163,
-0.009292561560869217,
-0.0632370114326477,
-0.023759009316563606,
0.08787216991186142,
0.06522971391677856,
-0.011836170218884945,
0.014978845603764057,
0.026597019284963608,
0.0382358655333519,
-0.04776871204376221,
-0.03752221539616585,
-0.04872852563858032,
-0.032196126878261566,
-0.07511860132217407,
-0.047116246074438095,
-0.03995738551020622,
-0.024719443172216415,
0.012322998605668545,
0.07137827575206757,
0.026807541027665138,
-0.0430612750351429,
-0.14782585203647614,
0.003959046211093664,
-0.0282116886228323,
0.05366060137748718,
-0.031149573624134064,
-0.05061933025717735,
-0.05118408799171448,
0.012970455922186375,
-0.030448662117123604,
0.030850794166326523,
0.009110682643949986,
-0.062489673495292664,
0.07868363708257675,
0.019441070035099983,
0.029540766030550003,
-0.0681803897023201,
-0.07458777725696564,
-0.04159782826900482,
-0.022322939708828926,
-0.02313973195850849,
0.027399171143770218,
0.02730977162718773,
0.016316590830683708,
-0.02259146235883236,
0.07079095393419266,
0.004926437046378851,
-0.016322707757353783,
-0.009137163870036602,
-0.0647440180182457,
-0.00407860754057765,
0.02489820122718811,
-4.286098522227764e-33,
-0.013125247322022915,
-0.0035568303428590298,
-0.07817411422729492,
0.009354934096336365,
-0.08647792041301727,
-0.012070931494235992,
0.015713529661297798,
-0.04740225523710251,
0.024105552583932877,
-0.08037896454334259,
0.03389645367860794,
0.007041572127491236,
0.032549891620874405,
0.029450850561261177,
-0.03469868376851082,
-0.01356538850814104,
-0.05982144549489021,
-0.04065491631627083,
-0.019437497481703758,
0.007298625074326992,
0.003324758028611541,
0.005770138464868069,
-0.0077583701349794865,
0.044982124119997025,
-0.05305641517043114,
0.026918772608041763,
-0.07607473433017731,
-0.008694937452673912,
0.049039192497730255,
0.021389367058873177,
0.03690236061811447,
-0.05439634621143341,
-0.0915956124663353,
-0.003702467540279031,
-0.024972958490252495,
-0.07076672464609146,
0.10468949377536774,
-0.04424326866865158,
-0.06993094831705093,
-0.00172136549372226,
0.07580780982971191,
0.009453566744923592,
0.01699618063867092,
0.11012627184391022,
-0.006871541030704975,
-0.03556443005800247,
0.005455206148326397,
-0.0006509689847007394,
0.014119349420070648,
0.04463215544819832,
0.0013383462792262435,
-0.013627396896481514,
0.04526825249195099,
0.03702316805720329,
-0.054151955991983414,
0.021199030801653862,
0.03154758736491203,
-0.027318933978676796,
-0.07834193110466003,
0.03583530709147453,
0.0734582468867302,
0.054518360644578934,
-0.013222386129200459,
0.0014348982367664576,
0.06833569705486298,
-0.06178700178861618,
-0.007423872593790293,
-0.015119122341275215,
0.10807906836271286,
-0.05439720302820206,
0.00016578673967160285,
-0.08903052657842636,
-0.06559542566537857,
-0.11336956918239594,
0.00030351176974363625,
0.08196033537387848,
0.04321148246526718,
-0.06743086129426956,
-0.04406333714723587,
-0.029927778989076614,
-0.09226465225219727,
0.0637541189789772,
-0.019226016476750374,
0.025658905506134033,
0.02994075044989586,
-0.08866944164037704,
-0.002001867163926363,
-0.06403043121099472,
0.003383037867024541,
0.005503030959516764,
-0.038412414491176605,
-0.0034276172518730164,
0.05752342566847801,
0.05691877007484436,
0.005646007601171732,
-6.07976673450139e-8,
-0.02533971518278122,
0.07475319504737854,
-0.04518914967775345,
0.0576540008187294,
0.047441985458135605,
-0.07157789170742035,
0.06508493423461914,
0.02613452821969986,
-0.0084751658141613,
-0.0412118062376976,
0.095426544547081,
0.08784417808055878,
-0.025896204635500908,
-0.017035573720932007,
-0.026308242231607437,
-0.009728587232530117,
-0.053118832409381866,
-0.05007096379995346,
-0.046731602400541306,
0.03649548068642616,
-0.0008449457818642259,
-0.04440414160490036,
0.006610795855522156,
0.023164881393313408,
-0.03492584079504013,
-0.03328738734126091,
0.05711745098233223,
0.04924200847744942,
0.03929612785577774,
0.05601552128791809,
0.009369350038468838,
0.07156772911548615,
-0.008944408968091011,
0.020595308393239975,
-0.04944426193833351,
0.01786569319665432,
-0.024901270866394043,
0.022050850093364716,
0.015412293374538422,
0.029842015355825424,
0.03246210515499115,
-0.025397902354598045,
-0.04711383581161499,
0.06117452308535576,
0.026499822735786438,
-0.0034464257769286633,
-0.08158676326274872,
0.0044260830618441105,
0.0628114715218544,
-0.09321729093790054,
0.009283771738409996,
-0.0069427755661308765,
-0.006837740074843168,
0.048437878489494324,
0.08145760744810104,
0.01131494902074337,
0.0028846291825175285,
0.03284604102373123,
-0.0024676222819834948,
0.030585842207074165,
0.008872650563716888,
0.0064988029189407825,
0.006635797210037708,
-0.07623938471078873
] | {
"pdf_file": "KNOSFODTQCUVGFKMJLWBF6KZS3RVBESD.pdf",
"text": "1167Internal Revenue Service, Treasury §1.9004 –2\nshall be considered as a consent to the appli-\ncation of the provisions of this subsection. \n(e) Terms; applicability of other laws. Except \nwhere otherwise distinctly expressed or manifestly intended, terms used in this sec-tion shall have the same meaning as when used in the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (or corresponding provisions of the Internal Rev-enue Code of 1939) and all provisions of law shall apply with respect to this section as if this section were a part of such Code (or cor-responding provisions of the Internal Rev-enue Code of 1939). \n(f) Regulations. The Secretary of the Treas-\nury or his delegate shall prescribe such regu-lations as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this section.\n(75 Stat. 674; 26 U.S.C. 613 note) [T.D. 6575, 26 FR 9632, Oct. 12, 1961]\n§1.9004 –1 Election relating to the de-\ntermination of gross income from the property for taxable years be-ginning prior to 1961 in the case of certain clays and shale. \n(a) In general. The Act of September \n26, 1961 (Pub. L. 87 –312, 75 Stat. 674), \nprovides that certain taxpayers may elect to apply the provisions thereof to all taxable years beginning before Jan-uary 1, 1961, with respect to which the election is effective. The Act prescribes special rules for the application of sec-tion 613 (a) and (c) of the Internal Rev-enue Code of 1954 (and corresponding provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939) in the case of shale and certain clays used by the mine owner or operator in the manufacture of cer-tain clay and shale products. \n(b) Election. The election to apply the \nprovisions of the Act may be made only by a mine owner or operator with re-spect to brick and tile clay, fire clay, or shale which he mined and used in the manufacture of building or paving brick, drainage and roofing tile, sewer pipe, flower pots, and kindred products. The election must be made in accord-ance with §1.9004 –4 on or before Decem-\nber 11, 1961, and the election shall be-come irrevocable on December 11, 1961. \n(c) Years to which the election is appli-\ncable. If the election described in para-\ngraph (b) of this section is made by the taxpayer, the provisions of the Act shall be effective for all taxable years beginning before January 1, 1961, in re-spect of which the: \n(1) Assessment of a deficiency, (2) Refund or credit of an overpay-\nment, or \n(3) Commencement of a suit for re-\ncovery of a refund under section 7405 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, \nis not prevented on September 26, 1961, \nby the operation of any law or rule of law. The election is also effective for any taxable year beginning before Jan-uary 1, 1961, in respect of which an as-sessment of a deficiency has been made but not collected on or before Sep-tember 26, 1961.\n(75 Stat. 674; 26 U.S.C. 613 note) \n[T.D. 6575, 26 FR 9632, Oct. 12, 1961]\n§1.9004 –2 Effect of election. \n(a) In general. If a taxpayer makes \nthe election described in paragraph (b) of §1.9004 –1, he shall be deemed to have \nconsented to the application of the Act with respect to all the clay and shale described in that paragraph for all tax-able years for which the election is ef-fective whether or not the taxpayer is litigating the issue for any of such years. Thus, in applying section 613 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (and corresponding provisions of the Inter-nal Revenue Code of 1939) to those years: \n(1) The ‘‘gross income from the prop-\nerty’’ for purposes of section 613(c) of \nthe Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (and corresponding provisions of the Inter-nal Revenue Code of 1939) shall be 50 percent of the amount for which the mineowner or operator sold, during the taxable year, the building or paving brick, drainage and roofing tile, sewer pipe, flower pots, and kindred products manufactured from the clay and shale described in paragraph (b) of §1.9004 –1, \nbut shall not exceed an amount equal to $12.50 multiplied by the number of short tons of all such clay or shale mined and used by the mineowner or operator in the manufacture of the products sold during the taxable year; and \n(2) The ‘‘taxable income from the \nproperty ’’ (computed without allow-\nance for depletion) for purposes of sec-tion 613(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (and corresponding provi-sions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939) shall be 50 percent of the taxable\nVerDate May<23>2002 14:34 Jul 09, 2002 Jkt 197091 PO 00000 Frm 01167 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\\SGML\\197091T.XXX pfrm17 PsN: 197091T"
} |
[
-0.05475806072354317,
0.08407388627529144,
0.006484373938292265,
0.03177216649055481,
-0.006102367304265499,
0.054546430706977844,
-0.0010665352456271648,
-0.06647448986768723,
0.003379016648977995,
0.0032701275777071714,
-0.0023682573810219765,
-0.02646978385746479,
-0.009410049766302109,
-0.012326502241194248,
-0.022346248850226402,
-0.030715005472302437,
0.05698375776410103,
-0.05161464586853981,
0.023115091025829315,
0.008138546720147133,
0.05186300352215767,
0.04697869345545769,
-0.003355866763740778,
-0.030018579214811325,
-0.07650668174028397,
0.022626414895057678,
0.0015528707299381495,
0.03033880703151226,
0.026794373989105225,
-0.018103547394275665,
0.021406065672636032,
0.025195233523845673,
0.07079415768384933,
-0.011571485549211502,
0.08226854354143143,
-0.01306330319494009,
0.06335088610649109,
0.015578171238303185,
0.010039199143648148,
0.03859568387269974,
-0.07386604696512222,
0.0029442249797284603,
-0.014635891653597355,
0.06319113820791245,
-0.06180897355079651,
0.0009623178048059344,
-0.003853766480460763,
-0.062604159116745,
-0.055984653532505035,
0.020206641405820847,
0.01984277553856373,
0.014536447823047638,
0.01145357359200716,
0.09263095259666443,
-0.07420256733894348,
-0.03621664643287659,
0.0697086751461029,
-0.024355003610253334,
-0.01485854759812355,
0.01257906574755907,
-0.05629372224211693,
-0.02615205943584442,
-0.0707925483584404,
0.03209993243217468,
-0.02516455017030239,
0.06465422362089157,
-0.03063092567026615,
-0.0002526735479477793,
0.03437306731939316,
-0.006756186485290527,
-0.05296871438622475,
-0.02068256586790085,
-0.07304919511079788,
0.031124474480748177,
0.0100952023640275,
0.08883689343929291,
0.045233454555273056,
0.0495150126516819,
0.08083397150039673,
-0.14258724451065063,
0.020885754376649857,
0.05829464644193649,
-0.003722981084138155,
-0.02123241312801838,
-0.0075659495778381824,
-0.015641015022993088,
-0.0228482224047184,
-0.0026375604793429375,
0.07181982696056366,
-0.0029728864319622517,
0.04039480537176132,
-0.040821973234415054,
-0.04435128718614578,
-0.012546992860734463,
0.08314540237188339,
-0.027362029999494553,
0.010803197510540485,
-0.03976524621248245,
-0.03204697370529175,
-0.007908291183412075,
0.00912446528673172,
-0.00933154858648777,
-0.08773085474967957,
-0.026945561170578003,
-0.0025599030777812004,
0.007556406781077385,
0.021441170945763588,
-0.030670860782265663,
0.015469778329133987,
0.03811849653720856,
0.045886531472206116,
0.028622139245271683,
-0.06730564683675766,
-0.050696324557065964,
0.04461483284831047,
-0.004758148919790983,
-0.065993532538414,
0.059487923979759216,
0.02412966638803482,
-0.05031413212418556,
0.00930143054574728,
0.026668250560760498,
-0.01500710193067789,
-0.040152691304683685,
-0.04898766055703163,
-0.08866531401872635,
0.009548641741275787,
5.255254676230369e-33,
0.006748565007001162,
0.07771942764520645,
-0.1278672218322754,
0.04179316759109497,
0.037507519125938416,
0.023740753531455994,
-0.033118847757577896,
-0.04115834832191467,
0.04062062129378319,
0.10760268568992615,
-0.052629854530096054,
0.05695214122533798,
0.04560962691903114,
-0.06301219016313553,
0.0561068169772625,
0.028133833780884743,
0.1055360734462738,
0.08764935284852982,
0.0371752567589283,
0.016735736280679703,
0.04433683678507805,
-0.04474848136305809,
0.003761008847504854,
-0.0142543725669384,
0.058711931109428406,
0.07910052686929703,
-0.04377385601401329,
0.010905293747782707,
-0.05045589432120323,
0.033196866512298584,
-0.01535635907202959,
0.015691358596086502,
0.0713682696223259,
0.023361625149846077,
0.07354427129030228,
0.028229665011167526,
-0.010424323379993439,
-0.07725238800048828,
0.015953416004776955,
-0.06614970415830612,
0.022653236985206604,
0.009596329182386398,
0.005724943708628416,
-0.0054877749644219875,
0.032962147146463394,
-0.09405495971441269,
0.032104842364788055,
0.009485232643783092,
0.09921977669000626,
0.0943106859922409,
-0.038653239607810974,
-0.003673332743346691,
-0.07627356052398682,
-0.048298224806785583,
-0.06632532179355621,
-0.0656251609325409,
-0.03188000246882439,
-0.0656658262014389,
0.040773164480924606,
-0.004363451153039932,
0.02265535481274128,
0.03489040210843086,
-0.05249930918216705,
-0.04610465094447136,
-0.0257637370377779,
-0.10907873511314392,
-0.055802371352910995,
-0.04142523184418678,
0.09059755504131317,
-0.11140791326761246,
-0.024889735504984856,
0.0543801449239254,
0.07182116061449051,
0.026212263852357864,
-0.020784834399819374,
0.003906688187271357,
0.015977054834365845,
0.09313277900218964,
0.0660586953163147,
0.06212807446718216,
0.036137714982032776,
0.0005222545587457716,
-0.009201118722558022,
0.04869446903467178,
0.041714269667863846,
0.060864273458719254,
0.044169969856739044,
0.06705939769744873,
-0.06829091161489487,
0.08767674118280411,
0.057806458324193954,
-0.047525789588689804,
-0.012250512838363647,
0.0685516819357872,
0.037140313535928726,
-6.747969401933497e-33,
0.019136784598231316,
-0.03552192449569702,
-0.045326218008995056,
-0.12353039532899857,
-0.0901152715086937,
0.028963129967451096,
0.034392621368169785,
-0.040304671972990036,
-0.05011783540248871,
-0.08589630573987961,
0.00005266137668513693,
-0.012598144821822643,
-0.018402228131890297,
-0.0580938495695591,
-0.006180913187563419,
0.022847775369882584,
0.06781654804944992,
0.005788459442555904,
-0.03248559311032295,
0.031197745352983475,
0.06563767790794373,
0.03324945271015167,
-0.12096042186021805,
0.05132316052913666,
0.013965309597551823,
0.05150636285543442,
-0.03880205377936363,
-0.0077610923908650875,
-0.01871897280216217,
0.009325655177235603,
-0.07658412307500839,
-0.023447178304195404,
-0.07129833102226257,
0.04405355453491211,
-0.05031110346317291,
-0.12572002410888672,
0.09054339677095413,
0.02951783314347267,
-0.08018380403518677,
-0.0019527793629094958,
0.06884802877902985,
0.1420448273420334,
-0.04805690795183182,
0.03037198632955551,
-0.042082466185092926,
-0.03965291753411293,
0.03420771658420563,
0.03306460753083229,
0.004240434151142836,
0.014023288153111935,
-0.04075410217046738,
-0.052966050803661346,
-0.01606987789273262,
0.011417169123888016,
-0.023918351158499718,
-0.00034504852374084294,
-0.015637053176760674,
-0.0496772862970829,
0.017879419028759003,
-0.03643229603767395,
0.10179775208234787,
0.0734637975692749,
0.009638655930757523,
-0.00003070311504416168,
0.05636841431260109,
0.02770068310201168,
-0.004757065791636705,
0.03163054957985878,
0.02084067277610302,
-0.04128602519631386,
-0.027162743732333183,
-0.11329500377178192,
0.033777087926864624,
-0.14824828505516052,
0.012482274323701859,
-0.05374898761510849,
0.0475936122238636,
-0.11065391451120377,
-0.08855906128883362,
0.04945936053991318,
0.0015728266444057226,
0.07159240543842316,
-0.143794447183609,
0.05745208263397217,
0.02660437300801277,
0.03639572113752365,
0.01449300441890955,
-0.07191140949726105,
0.025493934750556946,
-0.00899962242692709,
-0.08724980056285858,
-0.07005440443754196,
-0.03933564946055412,
0.06466088443994522,
0.05681891739368439,
-5.8909382261163046e-8,
0.0020748344250023365,
0.05136502534151077,
-0.02607714757323265,
-0.09707611054182053,
0.0873049646615982,
-0.003650900674983859,
-0.07110872864723206,
-0.04831535741686821,
-0.008864741772413254,
-0.031597789376974106,
0.10903181880712509,
0.000027635061996988952,
-0.013203280977904797,
-0.03711051866412163,
-0.013250227086246014,
0.00018851103959605098,
0.02400238625705242,
-0.042143795639276505,
-0.03511332720518112,
-0.0683487132191658,
-0.08295273035764694,
-0.052799664437770844,
-0.016729988157749176,
0.025455152615904808,
-0.003675983287394047,
0.0064546167850494385,
-0.013259458355605602,
-0.009724082425236702,
0.10151633620262146,
0.07630137354135513,
-0.08395069092512131,
0.03286277502775192,
0.0015727188438177109,
0.009731973521411419,
-0.03613710030913353,
0.007111582905054092,
0.05727340653538704,
-0.009820484556257725,
0.026487383991479874,
0.018703250214457512,
0.024271657690405846,
0.03609692305326462,
0.05481228604912758,
0.09764301776885986,
-0.0015294859185814857,
-0.010776995681226254,
-0.04295525327324867,
-0.06889194250106812,
0.0074015213176608086,
-0.04552558809518814,
-0.04193602874875069,
-0.04803325980901718,
0.00027400211547501385,
0.14959610998630524,
-0.036194488406181335,
0.01162785105407238,
-0.007367655634880066,
-0.04495701566338539,
-0.017251236364245415,
0.05575784295797348,
-0.017026608809828758,
-0.033635035157203674,
-0.016794251278042793,
-0.038974400609731674
] | {
"pdf_file": "3ZVA64MJREBJXFOQOIXK6WJVPBWFJF7L.pdf",
"text": "Nonpossessing Security Plan (Form date: May 2000)\nThis document outlines the security responsibilities of: (Company Name)\n \nwith it’s principal office and place of business at (Street, City, State and ZIP Code)\n \ndoing business at the following address:\n \nOur subcontract with UT-Battelle, LLC, does not require us to receive, store, transmit, or originate classified information\nwithin our facility (ies). Our personnel will, however, have authorized access to classified information at approved DOE\nfacility(ies). The DOE security clearances granted our personnel have been issued by DOE ORO for work within DOE OROfacilities.\nWe understand that we will be responsible for ensuring that the following security requirements are met:\nInitial, Comprehensive, and Annual Refresher briefings are conducted and documented as required by DOE Order\n470.1. SF-312, Classified Information Nondisclosure Agreement Form, is signed and processed prior to any access\nto classified information. \nTermination briefings are conducted and documented in accordance with DOE Order 470.1 for all cleared personnel\nleaving our employment, losing their clearances, or no longer requiring a clearance. Termination statements areforwarded to ORO through UT-Battelle, LLC, if applicable. DOE badges are recovered from employees andreturned to the issuing badge office. Unrecovered and lost badges are reported to the issuing badge office. \nDOE is notified 45 days in advance of any planned foreign travel to sensitive countries by DOE-cleared individuals.\n Foreign travel briefings and debriefings are conducted as required.\nAssistance is provided for personnel security clearance requests to ensure accurate completion. Provisions of the\nPrivacy Act are met when handling and mailing/delivering completed personnel security clearance requestdocuments. \nCleared personnel are informed of and comply with the personnel clearance reporting requirements.All DOE Government property in our possession is protected in accordance with DOE 5632.1C-1, Protection and\nControl of Safeguards and Security Interests, of 7/15/94 and DOE Manual 5632.1C-1, Change 1, of April 10, 1996. A property control security plan is developed and sent to DOE for formal approval, if we become responsible formore than $5 million in Government property.\nAny subcontractor, subbidder, individual, or organization that will provide supplies or services involving access to\nclassified information, must have the appropriate DOE facility clearance.\nForeign national employees are not placed in positions to exercise control or influence over properly cleared U.S.\ncitizens who have been granted access to DOE classified information or significant quantities of special nuclearmaterial.\nReporting requirements of the clause, DOE Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) 952.204-74, “Foreign ownership,\ncontrol, or influence over contractor,” are complied with.\nIf automatic data processing (ADP) functions with DOE or DOE contractor information are to be performed, ADP\nsystems and processes are documented and approved as required by DOE Order.\nProcedures are developed describing our internal processes for accomplishing each of the items above. Pers onnel\nare informed of their individual responsibilities in executing and supporting these procedures. \nEmployees will be familiar and comply with security procedures at sites where classified work is being performed.\nWe understand that designated representatives of DOE are required to inspect every five years the procedures,\nmethods, and facilities used by nonpossessing facilities in complying with DOE Orders. We shall assist byproviding necessary documentation for review. Should DOE, through its authorized representative, determine thatour security methods, procedures, or facilities do not comply, DOE shall submit a written report to us advising ofthe deficiencies. CERTIFICATIONS\nI have been designated Facility Security Officer and will be responsible for ensuring the above requirements are complied\nwith.\n______________________________________ ________________________________________\n Typed Name Signature and Date\nThe management representative undersigned certifies that the Facility Security Officer has been given the resources and\nmanagement support needed to accomplish the above. A new N onpossessing Security Plan will be executed if a new Facility\nSecurity Officer is appointed.\nCertified By (typed name): _________________________________________________\n Title: _________________________________________________\n Signature and Date: _________________________________________________ "
} |
[
0.05772397294640541,
-0.0859716534614563,
-0.0289571825414896,
0.10177305340766907,
-0.014998940750956535,
-0.015284714289009571,
-0.040187470614910126,
0.06702912598848343,
0.017921650782227516,
0.05855054780840874,
-0.03122137486934662,
-0.008897259831428528,
-0.06713731586933136,
-0.03975949063897133,
-0.003496406367048621,
-0.029222026467323303,
0.01651129499077797,
-0.05060318484902382,
0.06143568828701973,
0.07244143635034561,
0.012570983730256557,
-0.008051508106291294,
0.01714799366891384,
-0.049487970769405365,
0.08840293437242508,
0.06105624511837959,
-0.027551354840397835,
0.051904842257499695,
-0.03269148990511894,
-0.00024904098245315254,
-0.0895918533205986,
0.06903506815433502,
0.074264757335186,
0.014334366656839848,
0.02681780233979225,
-0.04263434559106827,
0.05733945220708847,
0.05871545895934105,
0.03974784165620804,
0.10478879511356354,
-0.0497397743165493,
-0.057311296463012695,
0.08645489811897278,
-0.05328807234764099,
-0.059435565024614334,
0.0054316166788339615,
-0.07513219863176346,
0.07936980575323105,
-0.044971443712711334,
0.07953828573226929,
0.03130224347114563,
0.10573659092187881,
-0.0258482713252306,
0.048719726502895355,
-0.004860877525061369,
0.024961235001683235,
-0.013905398547649384,
-0.02941661886870861,
0.06573805212974548,
0.026019956916570663,
-0.02938869595527649,
0.04788556694984436,
-0.006048715207725763,
-0.030154269188642502,
0.08412354439496994,
0.026196997612714767,
-0.027141615748405457,
-0.042801711708307266,
0.034397613257169724,
-0.05815460905432701,
-0.035020068287849426,
0.009173797443509102,
-0.052785392850637436,
-0.08158431202173233,
-0.06209283322095871,
0.008261973969638348,
0.05577939376235008,
-0.015685610473155975,
0.020692016929388046,
-0.07444917410612106,
-0.01197804231196642,
-0.06088445708155632,
-0.008904675021767616,
-0.07613186538219452,
-0.022229855880141258,
0.05096302554011345,
0.06537483632564545,
0.0226461011916399,
0.028685852885246277,
0.003570791333913803,
0.012270793318748474,
0.04959944263100624,
-0.019413361325860023,
0.04007434844970703,
-0.07162600010633469,
0.04802487790584564,
-0.030377214774489403,
0.015409127809107304,
0.03624174743890762,
0.009953055530786514,
0.1607278436422348,
0.028914375230669975,
-0.03845643997192383,
-0.006741887889802456,
-0.04118034988641739,
-0.05246401205658913,
0.01724039949476719,
0.0050428505055606365,
0.008226492442190647,
-0.0745479017496109,
-0.04568200930953026,
0.004338686820119619,
-0.019116772338747978,
-0.08242875337600708,
-0.036007359623909,
-0.0052209701389074326,
-0.10386047512292862,
-0.030634775757789612,
0.03576283156871796,
0.08513742685317993,
0.10286252945661545,
0.06277632713317871,
-0.056080639362335205,
0.046477898955345154,
-0.054381102323532104,
0.007859260775148869,
-0.04688212275505066,
5.442967532403257e-33,
-0.01593739539384842,
-0.03237984701991081,
0.06537586450576782,
-0.0904599279165268,
-0.02465975657105446,
0.01367913093417883,
0.007209237664937973,
-0.0034561336506158113,
-0.025339949876070023,
0.038865238428115845,
-0.03586610034108162,
0.06031014397740364,
-0.05162108317017555,
-0.0072420802898705006,
-0.005283573176711798,
-0.06835704296827316,
-0.03096889518201351,
0.0498906746506691,
0.049174714833498,
0.02295265905559063,
-0.01133437268435955,
-0.0194028839468956,
0.015670549124479294,
-0.04895300790667534,
0.059530436992645264,
-0.0006103403284214437,
-0.04188588261604309,
0.05864302068948746,
0.030832365155220032,
0.010584822855889797,
0.002223327988758683,
0.015197106637060642,
-0.00668411236256361,
-0.08049751073122025,
0.02717694453895092,
-0.09998971968889236,
0.026241613551974297,
0.04571891576051712,
-0.051534853875637054,
-0.0516529306769371,
-0.0009561445331200957,
0.08910559117794037,
-0.016858354210853577,
-0.014244799502193928,
-0.027506649494171143,
0.06184752285480499,
0.005422827322036028,
-0.05052943527698517,
0.045361436903476715,
-0.11360937356948853,
-0.04939351975917816,
-0.015238787047564983,
-0.034889839589595795,
-0.05101349577307701,
-0.018944190815091133,
-0.03224039450287819,
-0.021451005712151527,
-0.06717455387115479,
-0.02227352373301983,
0.05106975510716438,
-0.053053099662065506,
0.04935615137219429,
-0.005453122314065695,
-0.07630229741334915,
-0.13203103840351105,
0.08728324621915817,
-0.00551303755491972,
0.06786506623029709,
-0.10468239337205887,
0.06366066634654999,
0.020617691799998283,
0.02962392196059227,
0.059053245931863785,
-0.013625369407236576,
0.048024628311395645,
-0.010408192873001099,
0.14047741889953613,
-0.02091994695365429,
-0.0011450066231191158,
0.0005707558593712747,
-0.012601868249475956,
-0.03361469507217407,
0.11964649707078934,
0.010491215623915195,
-0.04833034425973892,
0.0035689000505954027,
-0.021971022710204124,
-0.028379026800394058,
0.041116200387477875,
-0.05339914187788963,
-0.04616481065750122,
-0.04285414516925812,
-0.006071135401725769,
-0.02303825318813324,
-0.053438540548086166,
-7.804535315863248e-33,
-0.03635314106941223,
0.09529399871826172,
-0.004999167751520872,
0.046296149492263794,
-0.01839105784893036,
0.0053709219209849834,
-0.01793607324361801,
0.10840128362178802,
0.07816527038812637,
0.06325109302997589,
0.0257867444306612,
0.05120578780770302,
-0.007292491849511862,
-0.010594232939183712,
-0.00713837007060647,
-0.005290775094181299,
0.019593335688114166,
0.030479218810796738,
-0.05165071785449982,
-0.06259021162986755,
-0.034651365131139755,
0.015379390679299831,
-0.018492428585886955,
0.08345382660627365,
0.01703924685716629,
0.037104081362485886,
-0.05402228608727455,
-0.04704297333955765,
-0.07382959872484207,
0.03640652075409889,
-0.03289235383272171,
-0.07124239206314087,
-0.03583759814500809,
0.007878911681473255,
-0.022447209805250168,
-0.05459858477115631,
0.019851097837090492,
-0.02228044904768467,
-0.040700796991586685,
0.029698792845010757,
0.0159931443631649,
0.03602304682135582,
-0.007862349040806293,
0.03126921132206917,
0.06552531570196152,
0.006924275774508715,
0.05740963667631149,
0.05060494318604469,
0.09222638607025146,
0.0067429374903440475,
-0.04235599562525749,
0.00015821664419490844,
-0.08607761561870575,
0.01638719066977501,
0.003163303714245558,
-0.011604556813836098,
0.05354985222220421,
0.02586548402905464,
-0.043214235454797745,
-0.016823934391140938,
-0.034336574375629425,
0.08213073760271072,
-0.012247579172253609,
-0.030041346326470375,
0.002353740157559514,
-0.018219001591205597,
-0.02038976177573204,
-0.062230948358774185,
0.0008763634832575917,
0.04924328997731209,
0.06367767602205276,
-0.06034604087471962,
-0.05620647966861725,
-0.01668573170900345,
0.01115102507174015,
0.13932909071445465,
-0.02696128934621811,
-0.02736472152173519,
0.004318952560424805,
0.09062997251749039,
-0.044008560478687286,
0.016567561775445938,
-0.01662430725991726,
-0.03343110904097557,
0.004743021447211504,
0.04202254116535187,
0.0063934409990906715,
-0.07070912420749664,
-0.086902916431427,
0.03009149432182312,
-0.058363836258649826,
-0.024547377601265907,
-0.03259442001581192,
0.028673799708485603,
-0.04629458487033844,
-7.431268755908604e-8,
0.03789857402443886,
-0.018098602071404457,
0.017976222559809685,
-0.0521913580596447,
0.06178633123636246,
-0.026081904768943787,
0.07492086291313171,
0.008448386564850807,
0.0365617498755455,
0.004460980650037527,
0.10391556471586227,
0.010857944376766682,
-0.08160478621721268,
-0.017257435247302055,
-0.01778857782483101,
-0.007150047924369574,
-0.09869300574064255,
0.022684674710035324,
-0.015149266459047794,
-0.06597297638654709,
0.007388062309473753,
0.06084959954023361,
0.04403824359178543,
-0.06233273446559906,
0.013717252761125565,
-0.07675506919622421,
-0.03801482543349266,
0.11427106708288193,
0.04602346569299698,
0.06052153930068016,
0.06790145486593246,
-0.014865581877529621,
0.02511042170226574,
-0.11384698748588562,
0.009384728968143463,
0.049334801733493805,
-0.06186981126666069,
0.058241985738277435,
-0.04675191640853882,
0.04172533005475998,
-0.01148667000234127,
-0.05546293407678604,
-0.013914935290813446,
0.03533611446619034,
0.03842758387327194,
-0.02285495214164257,
-0.0758795365691185,
-0.005747520364820957,
0.07932592183351517,
-0.15133601427078247,
0.015739796683192253,
-0.031185297295451164,
-0.052438318729400635,
0.014398250728845596,
0.0771336704492569,
0.03392015025019646,
-0.09248790144920349,
-0.002954517025500536,
-0.04550803452730179,
-0.14019650220870972,
0.04528888687491417,
-0.09090186655521393,
-0.052668917924165726,
0.06260483711957932
] | {
"pdf_file": "KUGCYDY3UTSLQLPAXLXFZWBNBXAGPN2U.pdf",
"text": "FEDERAL RESERVE statistical release\nFor release at 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time\n July 11, 2002H.6 (508)\nTable 1\nMONEY STOCK MEASURES\nBillions of dollars\nM33M22M11Date\nSeasonally adjusted\nNot seasonally adjusted 2000-July \n Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. 2001-Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. 2002-Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June p 4798.1\n 4832.2 4864.3 4881.9 4895.9 4936.0 4981.2 5020.3\n 5069.4 5111.8 5137.5 5184.1 5223.8 5261.2 5371.6 5364.7 5410.7 5454.8 5466.6 5500.6 5497.2 5479.8 5543.1 5576.0\n 4779.0\n 4811.6 4847.2 4859.0 4887.0 4959.7 4986.5 5016.0\n 5107.6 5181.6 5118.7 5170.5 5200.0 5237.3 5352.2 5336.1 5399.2 5479.7 5470.0 5491.7 5542.8 5557.1 5526.3 5564.9 1105.1\n 1102.1 1099.1 1099.2 1091.7 1088.9 1095.8 1098.9\n 1107.4 1109.7 1116.6 1125.6 1138.6 1147.2 1199.9 1160.8 1163.7 1179.3 1182.5 1184.4 1187.3 1176.0 1182.1 1188.6\n 1104.0\n 1095.9 1090.5 1093.6 1093.3 1112.3 1099.5 1087.5\n 1107.4 1122.6 1110.9 1123.0 1136.6 1141.8 1191.1 1155.2 1164.7 1203.5 1185.4 1171.7 1189.3 1188.3 1177.4 1186.3 6855.2\n 6928.4 6987.8 7011.5 7031.8 7115.0 7213.0 7280.0\n 7333.2 7436.4 7528.0 7615.5 7657.6 7668.6 7821.1 7867.2 7956.8 8027.5 8020.6 8062.8 8061.9 8045.7 8123.2 8163.9\n 6816.2\n 6886.8\n 6938.0 6961.0 7021.6 7150.3 7233.5 7307.4\n 7401.7 7518.1 7522.1 7600.7 7610.3 7619.5 7760.3 7803.5 7939.3 8065.7 8048.4 8094.2 8144.0 8136.9 8117.8 8149.5 2000-July \n Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. 2001-Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. 2002-Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June p \nFootnotes appear on the following page\np preliminary\nComponents may not add to totals due to rounding. Page 2\nM1 M2 M3H.6 (508)\nTable 2\nMONEY STOCK MEASURES\nPercent change at seasonally adjusted annual rates\n 5.1\n 3.4 7.2\n 3.2\n 4.1 7.7 5.7\n 4.4 7.6\n 3.4\n 4.6 7.5 3 Months from Mar. 2002 TO June 2002 \n 6 Months from Dec. 2001 TO June 2002 12 Months from June 2001 TO June 2002 \nThirteen weeks ending July 1 , 2002 \nfrom thirteen weeks ending:\n Apr. 1, 2002 (13 weeks previous) \n Dec. 31, 2001 (26 weeks previous) July 2, 2001 (52 weeks previous) 0.4\n 1.6 5.6\n -0.8\n 2.5 5.8\nFootnotes to Table 1:\n1. Consists of (1) currency outside the U.S. Treasury, Federal Reserve Banks, and the vaults of depository institutions; (2) tra velers checks of nonbank issuers; (3) demand deposits at all\ncommercial banks other than those due to depository institutions, the U.S. government, and foreign banks and official instituti ons, less cash items in the process of collection and Federal\nReserve float; and (4) other checkable deposits (OCDs), consisting of negotiable order of withdrawal (NOW) and automatic transf er service (ATS) accounts at depository institutions, credit\nunion share draft accounts and demand deposits at thrift institutions. Seasonally adjusted M1 is calculated by summing currency , travelers checks, demand deposits, and OCDs, each\nseasonally adjusted separately.\n2. Consists of M1 plus savings deposits (including money market deposit accounts), small-denomination time deposits (time deposi ts—including retail RPs—in amounts of less than $100,000),\nand balances in retail money market mutual funds. Excludes individual retirement account (IRA) and Keogh balances at depository institutions and money market funds. Seasonally adjusted\nM2 is computed by summing savings deposits, small-denomination time deposits, and retail money fund balances, each seasonally a djusted separately, and adding this result to seasonally\nadjusted M1.\n3. Consists of M2 plus large-denomination time deposits (in amounts of $100,000 or more), balances in institutional money funds, RP liabilities (overnight and term) issued by all depository\ninstitutions, and Eurodollars (overnight and term) held by U.S. residents at foreign branches of U.S. banks worldwide and at al l banking offices in the United Kingdom and Canada. Excludes\namounts held by depository institutions, the U.S. government, money funds, and foreign banks and official institutions. Seasona lly adjusted M3 is calculated by summing large time deposits,\ninstitutional money fund balances, RP liabilities, and Eurodollars, each seasonally adjusted separately, and adding this result to seasonally adjusted M2.\nNote: Current and historical H.6 data are available each week on the Federal Reserve Board's web site (http://www.federalreserv e.gov/). Monthly data are available back to January 1959,\nand weekly data are available back to January 1975 for most series. For information about individual copies or subscriptions, c ontact Publications Services at the Federal Reserve Board\n(phone 202-452-3245, fax 202-728-5886). For paid electronic access to current and historical data, call STAT-USA at 1-800-782-8 872 or 202-482-1986. Page 3\nH.6 (508)\nTable 3\nMONEY STOCK MEASURES\nBillions of dollars\nM1 M2 M3\n13-week\naverage4-week\naverageweek\naverageweek\naverageweek\naverage4-week\naverage4-week\naverage13-week\naverage13-week\naverage\n 2002-Apr. 8 \n 15 22 29 May 6 13 20 27 June 3 10 17 24p July 1p \nNot seasonally adjusted\n 2002-Apr. 8 15 22 29 May 6 13 20 27 June 3 10 17 24p July 1p 1180.3\n 1180.5 1181.9 1183.6 1182.7 1182.9 1183.0 1184.0\n 1185.8 1185.3 1184.6 1184.1 1183.9 \n 1191.4\n 1189.8 1190.8 1187.3 1187.0 1181.0 1175.7 1172.9\n 1183.3 1185.1 1185.0 1183.8 1185.0 1184.9\n 1179.5 1175.1 1175.2 1176.3 1176.9 1177.8 1179.2\n 1185.1 1187.1 1187.0 1187.9 1189.0 1183.6\n 1182.7 1182.6 1182.8 1182.0 1181.4 1180.4 1180.9\n 1182.0 1181.7 1181.1 1181.3 1182.3 \n 1169.9\n 1179.0 1197.3 1203.0 1168.8 1155.0 1176.1 1191.6\n 1210.4 1162.2 1175.6 1187.1 1215.2 1168.7\n 1166.4 1177.4 1188.3 1173.2 1168.7 1180.8 1194.1\n 1196.7 1176.8 1180.4 1197.6 1201.0 5489.3\n 5490.0 5491.2 5492.2 5495.1 5498.6 5501.4 5505.4\n 5508.5 5512.8 5518.2 5525.9 5534.3 5492.5\n 5481.5 5476.4 5476.6 5488.1 5505.3 5524.0 5540.5\n 5547.7 5552.3 5560.9 5567.8 5583.1 5470.8\n 5466.5 5471.2 5497.9 5516.9 5535.1 5546.2 5563.9\n 5545.5 5553.5 5580.6 5591.4 5606.8 \n 8051.1\n 8052.9 8054.9 8056.6 8059.3 8064.7 8068.5 8074.7\n 8079.7 8085.1 8092.0 8102.8 8112.5 8058.0\n 8043.5 8036.4 8042.9 8055.5 8080.5 8101.0 8119.2\n 8130.7 8133.1 8144.8 8158.8 8171.1 8033.8\n 8019.5 8039.2 8079.2 8083.9 8119.8 8121.0 8152.1\n 8129.9 8129.5 8167.7 8208.0 8179.2 \n 8167.2\n 8185.9 8123.6 8073.8 8091.6 8123.0 8118.8 8124.7\n 8143.9 8165.3 8176.0 8135.0 8119.9 8147.3\n 8156.6 8155.8 8137.6 8118.7 8103.0 8101.8 8114.5\n 8127.6 8138.2 8152.5 8155.1 8149.1 8106.4\n 8114.9 8120.0 8123.1 8125.2 8127.7 8128.8 8131.5\n 8133.0 8133.8 8135.9 8136.6 8134.5 5584.3\n 5601.1 5557.8 5486.7 5527.5 5530.8 5530.6 5512.3\n 5546.4 5574.1 5588.4 5535.8 5568.6 5551.3\n 5563.8 5575.1 5557.5 5543.3 5525.7 5518.9 5525.3\n 5530.0 5540.9 5555.3 5561.2 5566.7 5508.3\n 5516.4 5523.7 5528.5 5532.6 5535.9 5538.6 5540.8\n 5541.9 5544.0 5546.9 5548.7 5549.6 \nNote: Special caution should be taken in interpreting week-to-week changes in money supply data, which are highly volatile and s ubject to revision.\np preliminary data.\nComponents may not add to totals due to rounding.\nSeasonally adjusted\nPeriod ending Page 4\nCurrency1Travelers checks2Demand deposits3\n 243.1\n 246.5 248.6 249.6 255.2 261.0 258.0\n 258.5 253.4 254.8 261.1 261.3 260.4 260.5 259.4 263.3 264.2 \n 261.0\n 260.1 262.7 267.1 266.5 261.9 261.6 265.2 268.5 109.3\n 111.7 113.2 113.3 118.0 118.3 118.1\n 118.0 112.2 113.7 118.7 118.7 118.0 118.3 117.8 119.4 120.8 \n 118.8\n 117.1 119.1 122.3 120.7 118.9 120.2 121.5 122.9 133.8\n 134.8 135.4 136.4 137.2 142.7 139.9\n 140.5 141.2 141.1 142.4 142.6 142.5 142.1 141.6 143.9 143.4 \n 142.2\n 143.0 143.5 144.8 145.8 142.9 141.3 143.7 145.6 311.2\n 313.5 310.8 313.0 312.9 314.8 317.8\n 365.3 327.8 326.2 330.4 327.2 324.7 324.0 309.4 305.8 304.9 \n 302.3\n 297.2 304.8 312.5 313.8 297.3 299.5 311.4 309.6 8.0\n 7.9 7.8 7.9 8.2 8.6 8.8\n 8.4 8.2 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.7 7.7 7.8 8.2 \n 7.6\n 7.7 7.8 7.8 7.9 8.0 8.2 8.3 8.5 536.7\n 539.4 542.6 546.1 549.2 554.1 562.7\n 567.6 571.4 574.9 579.9 586.1 591.4 595.1 599.5 605.2 611.3 \n 602.3\n 603.7 605.5 606.7 608.5 609.6 611.1 612.7 614.3 H.6 (508)\nTable 4\nSEASONALLY ADJUSTED COMPONENTS OF M1\nBillions of dollars\nAt thrift\ninstitutions5 At commercial banks4TotalOther checkable deposits\n1. Currency outside U.S. Treasury, Federal Reserve Banks and the vaults of depository institutions.\n2. Outstanding amount of U.S. dollar-denominated travelers checks of nonbank issuers. Travelers checks issued by depository inst itutions are included in demand deposits.\n3. Demand deposits at commercial banks and foreign-related institutions other than those due to depository institutions, the U.S . government and foreign banks and official institutions, less cash\nitems in the process of collection and Federal Reserve float.\n4. Consists of NOW and ATS balances at commercial banks, U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks, and Edge Act corporations.\n5. Consists of NOW and ATS balances at thrifts, credit union share draft balances, and demand deposits at thrifts.\ne estimated p preliminary\nComponents may not add to totals due to rounding.Date\n 2001-Feb. \n Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. 2002-Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June p \nWeek ending 2002-May 6 13 20 27 June 3 10 17 24p July 1p Page 5\nH.6 (508)\nTable 5\nSEASONALLY ADJUSTED COMPONENTS OF NON-M1 M2\nBillions of dollars\nDateTotal\nNon-M1 M2\nTotalSavings deposits1 Small-denomination time deposits2\nAt thrift\ninstitutionsAt commercial\nbanksAt thrift\ninstitutionsAt commercial\nbanks\n 1929.3\n 1962.8 1997.7 2025.5 2061.7 2089.1 2130.8\n 2184.4 2216.6 2268.1 2307.3 2345.2 2396.4 2417.9 2437.1 2482.4 2510.6 \n 2465.6\n 2486.6 2486.2 2490.3 2474.2 2504.8 2523.6 2515.7 2523.8 1049.4\n 1046.5 1042.9 1040.3 1032.9 1023.8 1016.2\n 1009.6 999.7 987.0 973.1 958.7 948.0 939.6 932.9 930.4 927.9 \n 930.9\n 930.6 930.6 930.2 929.5 929.0 928.3 927.2 926.2 1467.6\n 1491.9 1521.2 1538.0 1563.7 1581.2 1612.8\n 1656.5 1673.5 1713.1 1745.8 1773.5 1806.2 1814.1 1824.5 1863.1 1884.1 \n 1843.7\n 1872.7 1869.0 1867.0 1855.4 1886.2 1895.2 1883.6 1890.4 461.7\n 470.9 476.4 487.5 498.0 508.0 518.0\n 527.9 543.1 554.9 561.5 571.7 590.2 603.8 612.6 619.3 626.5 \n 621.9\n 613.9 617.3 623.3 618.8 618.6 628.4 632.0 633.4 700.2\n 697.2 692.2 686.7 680.4 673.3 669.0\n 664.1 657.8 649.0 638.9 630.3 623.4 617.5 613.6 619.1 619.6 \n 612.4\n 620.5 620.7 620.9 620.5 620.1 620.0 619.2 618.3 349.2\n 349.3 350.7 353.5 352.5 350.4 347.2\n 345.6 341.9 338.0 334.2 328.4 324.6 322.1 319.3 311.4 308.4 \n 318.5\n 310.1 309.9 309.3 309.0 308.9 308.4 308.0 307.8 942.7\n 952.7 961.5 955.2 964.0 972.3 967.0\n 977.7 987.6 991.9 995.1 980.3 971.9 952.4 933.9 948.2 948.9 \n 947.2\n 949.2 948.6 949.3 945.0 942.9 948.3 951.0 956.0 3921.4\n 3962.0 4002.1 4020.9 4058.5 4085.2 4114.0\n 4171.7 4203.9 4247.0 4275.5 4284.1 4316.3 4309.9 4303.9 4361.0 4387.4 \n 4343.7\n 4366.5 4365.4 4369.8 4348.7 4376.7 4400.2 4393.9 4405.9 \n1. Savings deposits include money market deposit accounts.\n2. Small-denomination time deposits—including retail RPs—are those issued in amounts of less than $100,000. All IRA and Keogh ac count balances at commercial banks and thrifts are subtracted\nfrom small time deposits.\np preliminary\nComponents may not add to totals due to rounding.Retail\nmoney\nfunds Total\n 2001-Feb. \n Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. 2002-Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June p \nWeek ending 2002-May 6 13 20 27 June 3 10 17 24p July 1p Page 6\nH.6 (508)\nTable 6\nSEASONALLY ADJUSTED COMPONENTS OF NON-M2 M3\nBillions of dollars\nDateLarge-denomination time deposits1\nTotalAt thrift\ninstitutionsAt commercial\nbanks2\n 107.0\n 107.4 109.3 110.8 109.7 111.6 114.7\n 115.8 115.9 114.4 113.9 115.2 114.5 113.8 114.4 111.4 109.8 \n 114.4\n 111.7 110.9 110.0 109.9 109.9 110.0 109.7 109.7 209.9\n 223.3 216.4 215.2 212.8 215.3 211.2\n 211.9 208.9 212.9 209.1 209.5 218.0 222.5 222.6 222.9 223.4 \n 224.1\n 223.5 220.0 221.8 227.1 224.9 221.8 225.6 219.4 885.6\n 908.7 934.3 987.6 1026.9 1038.5 1031.3\n 1081.4 1149.8 1181.5 1207.2 1179.2 1177.4 1177.2 1175.2 1185.1 1195.0 \n 1168.2\n 1185.1 1179.8 1203.1 1188.5 1189.3 1203.0 1206.4 1181.9 698.1\n 671.8 692.6 699.6 704.2 695.0 680.6\n 681.8 673.2 666.3 670.4 678.7 677.3 678.7 688.2 696.1 694.1 \n 694.2\n 700.9 700.1 689.9 691.9 686.5 691.3 707.3 693.5 805.1\n 779.1 801.9 810.4 813.9 806.6 795.3\n 797.6 789.1 780.7 784.3 794.0 791.8 792.5 802.6 807.6 803.9 \n 808.6\n 812.6 811.0 800.0 801.8 796.4 801.2 817.0 803.2 359.2\n 352.7 372.0 377.3 377.8 373.5 369.6\n 358.6 354.6 371.1 372.1 371.3 375.0 372.5 365.6 364.5 365.5 \n 366.1\n 363.5 364.1 363.3 367.0 365.3 361.0 367.6 367.8 2259.7\n 2263.8 2324.6 2390.5 2431.4 2433.9 2407.4\n 2449.5 2502.5 2546.1 2572.7 2554.0 2562.2 2564.6 2565.8 2580.1 2587.9 \n 2567.0\n 2584.6 2574.8 2588.1 2584.4 2576.0 2587.1 2616.5 2572.3 \n1. Large-denomination time deposits are those issued in amounts of $100,000 or more, excluding those booked at international ban king facilities.\n2. Large-denomination time deposits at commercial banks less those held by money market mutual funds, depository institutions, U .S. government, and foreign banks and official institutions.\n3. Overnight and term RPs of $100,000 or more issued by depository institutions, excluding those held by depository institutions and by money funds.\n4. Overnight and term Eurodollars issued to U.S. addressees by foreign branches of U.S. banks worldwide and by all banking offic es in the United Kingdom and Canada, excluding those held by\ndepository institutions and by money funds.\np preliminary\nComponents may not add to totals due to rounding.Total\nNon-M2 M3Eurodollars\n4RPs3 Institutional\nmoney funds\n 2001-Feb. \n Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. 2002-Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June p \nWeek ending 2002-May 6 13 20 27 June 3 10 17 24p July 1p Page 7\nCurrency1Travelers checks2Demand deposits3\n 8.2\n 8.0 7.9 8.0 8.0 8.2 8.4\n 8.3 8.1 7.9 7.9 8.0 8.0 7.9 7.9 7.9 8.0 \n 7.8\n 7.9 7.9 7.9 7.9 8.0 8.0 8.1 8.1 H.6 (508)\nTable 7\nNOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED COMPONENTS OF M1\nBillions of dollars\nAt thrift\ninstitutions5 At commercial banks4TotalOther checkable deposits\n1. Currency outside U.S. Treasury, Federal Reserve Banks and the vaults of depository institutions.\n2. Outstanding amount of U.S. dollar-denominated travelers checks of nonbank issuers. Travelers checks issued by depository inst itutions are included in demand deposits.\n3. Demand deposits at commercial banks and foreign-related institutions other than those due to depository institutions, the U.S . government and foreign banks and official institutions, less cash\nitems in the process of collection and Federal Reserve float.\n4. Consists of NOW and ATS balances at commercial banks, U.S. branches and agencies of foreign banks, and Edge Act corporations.5. Consists of NOW and ATS balances at thrifts, credit union share draft balances, and demand deposits at thrifts.\ne estimated p preliminary\nComponents may not add to totals due to rounding.Date\n 536.2\n 539.8 542.9 545.8 548.8 554.5 561.8\n 566.2 569.7 575.3 584.9 584.7 591.0 596.1 599.7 605.3 610.6 \n 603.3\n 604.4 604.6 607.5 607.5 610.6 610.1 610.6 612.6 303.9\n 310.9 312.5 306.8 309.8\n \n 315.4 316.1\n 361.4 327.3 329.3 348.2 329.7 316.9 322.7 309.9 300.1 302.0 \n 293.0\n 285.4 301.6 309.0 321.1 282.1 296.7 302.2 322.4 133.1\n 136.5 142.5 136.9 137.5\n \n 138.7 135.4\n 135.5 138.8 138.7 145.9 148.5 141.7 143.9 149.0 144.5 143.7 \n 141.6\n 139.6 144.0 148.7 149.6 138.5 139.9 146.8 148.6 106.2\n 112.2 116.9 113.4 118.9 119.8 120.0\n 119.7 111.3 113.4 116.6 114.5 114.2 118.8 121.9 119.7 121.9 \n 123.1\n 117.7 118.1 118.6 124.4 123.0 120.8 119.3 123.4 239.3\n 248.7 259.3 250.2 256.3 258.5 255.5\n 255.2 250.1 252.1 262.5 263.1 255.9 262.7 270.9 264.1 265.6 \n 264.7\n 257.3 262.1 267.2 274.0 261.5 260.8 266.1 272.1 2001-Feb. \n Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. 2002-Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June p \nWeek ending 2002-May 6 13 20 27 June 3 10 17 24p July 1p Page 8\nH.6 (508)\nTable 8\nNOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED COMPONENTS OF NON-M1 M2\nBillions of dollars\nDateTotal\nNon-M1 M2TotalSavings deposits1 Small-denomination time deposits2\nAt thrift\ninstitutionsAt commercial\nbanksAt thrift\ninstitutionsAt commercial\nbanks\n 1919.2\n 1972.3 2025.9 2022.9 2066.8 2087.3 2123.8\n 2183.0 2200.7 2264.3 2313.1 2335.8 2383.0 2432.3 2472.6 2480.1 2517.0 \n 2490.4\n 2503.4 2485.9 2451.5 2473.0 2549.9 2549.4 2487.2 2495.1 1052.7\n 1047.3 1042.1 1036.6 1027.7 1020.4 1014.7\n 1010.2 1002.2 989.6 974.2 961.8 950.9 940.2 932.1 927.2 923.5 \n 928.8\n 927.9 927.1 926.3 925.3 924.7 923.8 922.3 921.9 1459.9\n 1499.1 1542.8 1536.0 1567.5 1579.8 1607.4\n 1655.4 1661.6 1710.3 1750.2 1766.4 1796.1 1824.8 1851.1 1861.4 1888.9 \n 1862.2\n 1885.4 1868.7 1837.9 1854.5 1920.2 1914.6 1862.3 1868.9 459.3\n 473.2 483.2 486.8 499.2 507.5 516.3\n 527.5 539.2 554.0 562.9 569.4 586.9 607.4 621.5 618.7 628.1 \n 628.1\n 618.0 617.2 613.6 618.5 629.7 634.8 624.9 626.2 702.4\n 697.7 691.7 684.3 677.0 671.1 668.0\n 664.5 659.4 650.7 639.6 632.3 625.2 617.9 613.0 616.9 616.6 \n 611.0\n 618.7 618.3 618.3 617.7 617.3 616.9 616.0 615.5 350.3\n 349.6 350.4 352.3 350.7 349.3 346.7\n 345.8 342.8 338.9 334.5 329.5 325.6 322.3 319.0 310.3 306.9 \n 317.7\n 309.2 308.7 308.0 307.6 307.5 306.9 306.4 306.4 956.6\n 980.6 990.9 948.3 953.0 955.8 957.0\n 967.9 977.9 980.6 989.0 987.0 986.2 981.0\n \n 964.1 941.6 938.1 \n 939.5\n 944.5 941.5 942.9 937.7 937.2 939.6 939.2 936.4 3928.5\n 4000.2 4058.9 4007.8 4047.5 4063.4 4095.5\n 4161.1 4180.9 4234.5 4276.3 4284.6 4320.0 4353.5 4368.8 4348.9 4378.6 \n 4358.6\n 4375.8 4354.5 4320.7 4336.0 4411.9 4412.8 4348.7 4353.4 \n1. Savings deposits include money market deposit accounts.\n2. Small-denomination time deposits—including retail RPs—are those issued in amounts of less than $100,000. All IRA and Keogh ac count balances at commercial banks and thrifts are subtracted\nfrom small time deposits.\np preliminary\nComponents may not add to totals due to rounding.Retail\nmoney\nfunds Total\n 2001-Feb. \n Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. 2002-Jan. Feb. Mar. \n \n Apr. May June p \nWeek ending 2002-May 6 13 20 27 June 3 10 17 24p July 1p Page 9\nH.6 (508)\nTable 9\nNOT SEASONALLY ADJUSTED COMPONENTS OF NON-M2 M3\nBillions of dollars\nDateLarge-denomination time deposits1\nTotal At thrift\ninstitutionsAt commercial\nbanks2\n 106.7\n 107.7 109.6 111.7 110.5 111.6 114.2\n 115.3 115.6 114.7 114.0 114.0 114.2 114.2 114.6 112.4 110.6 \n 114.2\n 112.0 112.1 111.8 111.6 111.1 110.8 110.2 110.0 59.9\n 58.2 59.3 59.7 58.7 58.1 55.9\n 49.3 48.2 52.8 60.4 74.5 79.5 76.0 64.4 60.7 58.8 \n 62.3\n 60.3 60.5 60.5 59.7 58.9 57.7 59.6 58.4 914.2\n 932.2 942.3 985.0 1014.5 1017.2 1013.8\n 1051.4 1127.2 1175.1 1218.5 1211.2 1215.6 1208.0 1185.1 1182.2 1180.8 \n 1160.2\n 1183.0 1179.7 1204.5 1179.3 1188.8 1191.9 1184.2 1155.4 696.5\n 674.2 694.7 705.5 709.1 694.7 677.5\n 679.1 671.6 668.0 670.5 671.4 675.7 681.0 689.4 702.2 699.2 \n 693.4\n 703.1 707.6 701.4 702.7 693.8 696.3 710.7 695.3 803.2\n 781.9 804.3 817.2 819.6 806.3 791.6\n 794.4 787.2 782.7 784.4 785.4 789.9 795.2 804.0 814.5 809.9 \n 807.6\n 815.2 819.7 813.3 814.3 804.9 807.1 820.9 805.3 301.6\n 296.3 311.7 323.2 324.2 315.8 312.6\n 303.8 299.8 317.6 312.5 296.8 297.1 297.4 301.0 308.7 311.8 \n 307.9\n 310.1 306.0 307.8 314.1 313.8 310.1 310.8 311.3 361.5\n 354.5 370.9 382.9 383.0 373.9 368.5\n 353.1 348.0 370.4 372.9 371.3 376.6 373.4 365.4 369.5 370.5 \n 370.2\n 370.4 366.5 368.2 373.8 372.7 367.8 370.4 369.7 \n1. Large-denomination time deposits are those issued in amounts of $100,000 or more, excluding those booked at international ban king facilities.\n2. Large-denomination time deposits at commercial banks less those held by money market mutual funds, depository institutions, U .S. government, and foreign banks and official institutions.\n3. Overnight and term RPs of $100,000 or more issued by depository institutions, excluding those held by depository institutions and by money funds.\n4. Overnight and term Eurodollars issued to U.S. addressees by foreign branches of U.S. banks worldwide and by all banking offic es in the United Kingdom and Canada, excluding those held by\ndepository institutions and by money funds.\np preliminary\nComponents may not add to totals due to rounding.Total\nNon-M2 M3 Eurodollars\n4Institutional\nmoney funds\n 212.5\n 225.5 219.0 218.4 213.2 213.0 208.3\n 209.2 205.0 212.0 210.2 210.5 220.4 224.7 225.2 225.3 223.4 \n 226.1\n 223.6 222.3 226.5 230.0 225.0 220.9 223.6 221.0 2291.4\n 2294.1 2336.5 2403.4 2430.2 2410.4 2382.3\n 2408.1 2467.4 2540.1 2586.0 2578.3 2602.5 2601.2 2579.8 2591.5 2584.6 \n 2564.2\n 2592.2 2588.2 2612.5 2597.5 2591.3 2587.6 2599.2 2551.3 2001-Feb. \n Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. 2002-Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June p \nWeek ending 2002-May 6 13 20 27 June 3 10 17 24p July 1p RPs\n3\nTotal At thrift\ninstitutionsAt commercial\nbanks Page 10\nH.6 (508)\nTable 10\nMEMORANDUM ITEMS\nBillions of dollars, not seasonally adjusted\nAt\nthrift\ninstitutionsAt\ncommercial\nbanksTotalTotal\ncash\nbalanceIRA and Keogh Accounts U.S. government deposits Demand deposits\nat banks due to\nDateForeign\ncommercial\nbanksForeign\nofficial\ninstitutionsNote\nbalances at\ndepository\ninstitutions1Balance\nat\nFederal\nReserveDemand\ndeposits at\ncommercial\nbanks\n1. Source: Daily Treasury statement.\ne estimated\np preliminaryComponents may not add to totals due to rounding. 406.2 \n 412.5 415.0 414.2 413.4 415.1 418.9 \n 422.6 423.3 421.9 420.6 418.5 e 416.2 e 413.9 e 413.1 e 413.5 e 414.0 e \n \n 2001-Feb. \n Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. 2002-Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June p \nWeek ending 2002-May 6 13 20 27 June 3 10 17 24p July 1p 8.4 \n 7.3 6.9 7.4 7.8 8.0 8.0 \n 8.1 8.2 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 8.8 8.9 e 8.9 e 8.9 e \n \n 1.4 \n 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.1 \n 1.3 1.6 1.4 1.5 1.3 1.3 1.0 1.0 e 1.0 e 1.0 e \n \n 34.1 \n 36.2 34.9 30.7 26.5 23.7 21.9 \n 20.2 19.2 18.8 18.4 18.2 18.1 18.0 18.0 e 18.0 e 18.0 e \n \n 1.2\n 1.2 4.7 1.1 2.0 1.1 1.1\n 2.1 2.6 2.8 4.1 3.5 2.6 2.7 4.6 3.0 4.2 \n 2.9\n 2.8 3.2 3.0 3.2 2.5 3.3 5.1 6.6 4.9\n 5.4 5.9 5.1 5.6 5.1 5.0\n 6.6 5.2 5.1 5.3 7.0 4.9 5.6 6.1 5.1 6.1 \n 5.0\n 5.2 5.0 5.2 5.1 5.3 5.4 6.8 6.9 16.0\n 6.4 18.8 25.7 15.2 19.9 26.7\n 19.6 27.8 22.5 27.2 39.2 33.0 16.9 5.8 7.5 16.3 \n 16.3\n 4.5 8.0 5.5 7.3 11.5 11.7 18.4 28.3 22.1\n 13.0 29.4 31.9 22.8 26.1 32.8\n 28.4 35.6 30.4 36.5 49.7 40.5 25.1 16.5 15.5 26.6 \n 24.2\n 12.5 16.2 13.7 15.7 19.3 20.4 30.2 41.8 7.4 \n 8.1 8.7 9.2 9.7 10.2 10.8 \n 11.4 11.5 11.1 10.7 11.5 13.0 14.6 15.2 e 15.2 e 15.2 e \n \n 159.0 \n 160.2 161.0 161.2 161.4 161.3 160.9 \n 160.5 160.3 160.3 160.2 160.1 160.1 160.0 160.3 e 160.7 e 161.1 e \n \n 95.9 \n 96.4 96.4 95.9 95.4 95.3 95.5 \n 95.7 95.5 95.1 94.7 95.0 95.8 96.6 96.9 e 97.0 e 97.0 e \n \n 151.3 \n 155.8 157.6 157.1 156.5 158.5 162.4 \n 166.3 167.4 166.6 165.8 163.4 e 160.4 e 157.3 e 155.9 e 155.9 e 155.9 e \n \n Time and\nsavings\ndeposits at\ncommercial\nbanksAt\nmoney\nmarket\nfundsTime and\nsavings\ndeposits\ndue to\nforeign\nbanks and\nofficial\ninstitutions"
} |
[
-0.06492441892623901,
-0.021065514534711838,
-0.06270033866167068,
0.028303006663918495,
0.07379625737667084,
-0.010080466978251934,
0.0224546417593956,
0.013091699220240116,
-0.026733769103884697,
-0.01031399518251419,
0.03988770768046379,
0.011618300341069698,
0.005506185349076986,
-0.001999449450522661,
-0.07406093925237656,
0.045093074440956116,
-0.07503271847963333,
-0.133816197514534,
0.0003325640573166311,
0.005097934976220131,
-0.04559475928544998,
0.011240649037063122,
-0.0069731916300952435,
0.014435837045311928,
-0.012015147134661674,
0.025023307651281357,
0.06721968948841095,
-0.04738375544548035,
-0.024130890145897865,
-0.0444769412279129,
0.02301197685301304,
0.043191250413656235,
-0.01551525667309761,
0.01995423622429371,
0.038833651691675186,
0.03484533354640007,
-0.004665101412683725,
-0.05560309812426567,
-0.054106827825307846,
-0.02485390193760395,
0.05576992779970169,
-0.054955653846263885,
0.1056201159954071,
-0.040457941591739655,
0.0395013652741909,
-0.0028521260246634483,
-0.05721382051706314,
-0.05170326307415962,
-0.004591239150613546,
0.021197674795985222,
0.055057093501091,
-0.005593076813966036,
0.019490819424390793,
0.031515173614025116,
0.00009782329289009795,
0.01591556891798973,
-0.08574328571557999,
-0.03722798824310303,
0.039593733847141266,
-0.04143524914979935,
0.09102410823106766,
0.019832909107208252,
-0.10307054221630096,
-0.03618801012635231,
-0.013655813410878181,
0.07743985950946808,
-0.029158174991607666,
-0.055647481232881546,
-0.002260655863210559,
-0.035109031945466995,
-0.028648048639297485,
0.05935855954885483,
-0.015075978823006153,
-0.07593094557523727,
0.05590014159679413,
0.05848298594355583,
0.07355163246393204,
-0.024999573826789856,
0.04771386831998825,
-0.09087751060724258,
-0.05148972570896149,
-0.021258657798171043,
0.06786259263753891,
0.0440504364669323,
-0.02211911790072918,
0.09188810735940933,
-0.04793383181095123,
-0.008796588517725468,
-0.017651675269007683,
-0.015537181869149208,
0.025419780984520912,
0.028096891939640045,
-0.07066020369529724,
0.030555875971913338,
-0.042316850274801254,
0.09475185722112656,
0.08232247084379196,
-0.023739594966173172,
0.05245210975408554,
0.07415027171373367,
0.030081190168857574,
0.01707261987030506,
-0.05514271929860115,
0.0204828642308712,
-0.14942821860313416,
-0.00044653547229245305,
0.04455841705203056,
0.05857356637716293,
0.036425404250621796,
0.01392335258424282,
0.06316179037094116,
0.020485881716012955,
0.03426624462008476,
-0.022502616047859192,
0.009931309148669243,
-0.013211535289883614,
0.011786636896431446,
0.025986775755882263,
-0.003364675445482135,
-0.043917182832956314,
-0.004322586581110954,
0.010259830392897129,
0.004961228929460049,
0.09808223694562912,
0.019687356427311897,
0.02995341271162033,
-0.06686363369226456,
1.412813142068273e-32,
0.05859906226396561,
-0.0008257806766778231,
0.01063187699764967,
0.007999237626791,
-0.13390207290649414,
0.02403990738093853,
-0.06289678812026978,
-0.02913409098982811,
-0.08627253770828247,
0.0002392060705460608,
-0.14613384008407593,
-0.012699070386588573,
0.005959154572337866,
-0.1081356629729271,
-0.0414121188223362,
-0.025801420211791992,
0.03832614794373512,
0.06443778425455093,
-0.034394219517707825,
0.00628426019102335,
0.016343872994184494,
0.02983115240931511,
-0.04809119924902916,
-0.07087250053882599,
0.09500264376401901,
0.05792191997170448,
0.03156939521431923,
-0.04910555109381676,
-0.01615460403263569,
0.0015493481187149882,
0.0019216194050386548,
0.03869149088859558,
-0.09815730899572372,
0.05006016790866852,
0.008857956156134605,
0.0710703432559967,
-0.059693560004234314,
-0.02451414428651333,
-0.030225226655602455,
-0.03610178828239441,
0.07025133073329926,
-0.004090460482984781,
-0.02403954043984413,
-0.013528963550925255,
0.07382871210575104,
-0.021026991307735443,
0.014489825814962387,
-0.0388968251645565,
0.07128933072090149,
0.0004841611662413925,
-0.07778339833021164,
0.006937540136277676,
0.0014323139330372214,
0.03957322984933853,
-0.01112110260874033,
0.003703984897583723,
0.06648783385753632,
0.011507458984851837,
0.0816294476389885,
0.06575722992420197,
0.10295967757701874,
0.03436390683054924,
-0.029840173199772835,
-0.03845137357711792,
0.05891728028655052,
0.06469132751226425,
0.014488890767097473,
0.020672472193837166,
-0.019104445353150368,
0.06638149172067642,
-0.039211489260196686,
-0.02485656552016735,
0.07518661767244339,
-0.0020686292555183172,
0.0841563418507576,
-0.040639229118824005,
0.04196971282362938,
0.02731562964618206,
0.0033981897868216038,
0.07511349022388458,
-0.021518977358937263,
-0.13152696192264557,
0.007927005179226398,
-0.06194789707660675,
-0.12895911931991577,
-0.06846883147954941,
-0.020146789029240608,
-0.08506592363119125,
-0.01056027039885521,
-0.039233576506376266,
0.06169132888317108,
-0.009871951304376125,
0.005095884669572115,
0.032265398651361465,
-0.15508393943309784,
-1.2176628596693354e-32,
-0.028697805479168892,
0.004133637063205242,
-0.032310355454683304,
0.019107520580291748,
-0.007561905309557915,
-0.035829540342092514,
0.06425124406814575,
0.06662842631340027,
0.0043367668986320496,
0.009115764871239662,
0.16093939542770386,
-0.017154067754745483,
-0.018473977223038673,
-0.07826175540685654,
0.07564148306846619,
0.033569782972335815,
0.08247818797826767,
-0.04376291111111641,
0.05208244547247887,
0.023813385516405106,
-0.05133204162120819,
0.09211695939302444,
0.005941376555711031,
-0.08315818011760712,
0.005090582650154829,
0.028402497991919518,
0.08867219090461731,
-0.022217245772480965,
-0.005382233764976263,
0.005013810470700264,
-0.04481387138366699,
0.017856350168585777,
-0.022830815985798836,
0.10485884547233582,
-0.07485685497522354,
-0.011087190359830856,
-0.029172666370868683,
-0.06224057078361511,
-0.03497464209794998,
-0.04950668290257454,
0.007677920162677765,
0.08870171755552292,
-0.07387585192918777,
0.06946863979101181,
0.04681749641895294,
0.03898325935006142,
-0.048087023198604584,
0.06632670015096664,
0.03593575581908226,
-0.007652927190065384,
-0.002334906253963709,
-0.011042497120797634,
-0.019922545179724693,
0.01475443784147501,
0.006252171006053686,
0.011260324157774448,
0.03003140725195408,
0.07433345913887024,
-0.07039780914783478,
-0.027455918490886688,
-0.009219782426953316,
-0.07624205946922302,
0.04743192717432976,
-0.011888138018548489,
0.008163618855178356,
-0.02148142084479332,
0.06533467024564743,
0.02743237279355526,
-0.003908064216375351,
0.014811425469815731,
0.0655745193362236,
-0.024840060621500015,
0.03576752170920372,
0.018427446484565735,
-0.013076815754175186,
-0.04520184546709061,
0.016420040279626846,
-0.03378036990761757,
0.00770990876480937,
-0.034309275448322296,
-0.03691793233156204,
0.01983007974922657,
0.018012581393122673,
0.07298881560564041,
0.0649799332022667,
0.01653129979968071,
-0.018603630363941193,
0.07630080729722977,
0.012664861045777798,
0.031291551887989044,
0.009390050545334816,
-0.018034134060144424,
0.0385548435151577,
0.055089112371206284,
0.02028488740324974,
-5.5210090721402594e-8,
0.028852667659521103,
-0.03064044751226902,
-0.06113380193710327,
-0.053393203765153885,
0.019000232219696045,
-0.01653837226331234,
0.027629492804408073,
0.01585289277136326,
-0.035956159234046936,
0.015161369927227497,
0.08636355400085449,
-0.058660704642534256,
-0.07314559072256088,
-0.05258000269532204,
0.06271942704916,
-0.008065144531428814,
-0.079127736389637,
-0.01789948157966137,
-0.051539864391088486,
-0.05047452077269554,
-0.034554414451122284,
-0.0035828733816742897,
0.045154836028814316,
-0.04450772702693939,
0.04261666536331177,
-0.0014512104680761695,
-0.03469891846179962,
0.04115595668554306,
0.016945943236351013,
-0.09831821918487549,
-0.08575210720300674,
-0.006418335251510143,
0.05227702483534813,
-0.04654594138264656,
-0.04295426607131958,
0.11932866275310516,
-0.05431479588150978,
0.13025681674480438,
0.09358174353837967,
0.06962509453296661,
-0.06884437799453735,
0.03436646610498428,
0.01683128997683525,
0.030198462307453156,
-0.07932741940021515,
0.013108515180647373,
-0.01803576946258545,
-0.04414165019989014,
0.026855455711483955,
-0.1033378541469574,
-0.03833986818790436,
-0.02328731119632721,
-0.022746341302990913,
-0.04478984698653221,
-0.09549085050821304,
0.02026502415537834,
-0.09464980661869049,
-0.02633257955312729,
-0.0032541416585445404,
0.009706113487482071,
0.01178044080734253,
-0.0350923091173172,
-0.08820055425167084,
-0.030607230961322784
] | {
"pdf_file": "HCHQUVOOEBJYJX23WCEMGGC2WVXF2F3G.pdf",
"text": "10 5 0 −5 −10\nXSM1050−5−10YSMVAN ALLEN PROBES 2013 099 (04/09) 16:00 to 2013 100 (04/10) 00:00\n \n \n \n00A\n16A00B16B00T516T5\n00T316T3\n00T416T4\n00C416C4\n00G1316G13\n00G1516G15\nRBSPA−A, RBSPB−B, THEMISA−T5, THEMISD−T3, THEMISE−T4, CLUSTER4−C4, GOES13−G13, GOES15−G15, Fri Aug 16 09:37:55 2013 "
} |
[
-0.052746791392564774,
-0.019250933080911636,
0.058941181749105453,
-0.06423988193273544,
-0.016126498579978943,
0.004816755652427673,
0.022918501868844032,
-0.021960077807307243,
-0.09274360537528992,
0.06469716131687164,
-0.08411654084920883,
-0.008304041810333729,
0.07604649662971497,
0.017273420467972755,
-0.06085605174303055,
0.06043713912367821,
0.01339101791381836,
-0.04628315195441246,
0.013957154005765915,
0.03655454143881798,
-0.06136687472462654,
0.050763703882694244,
-0.009010137058794498,
-0.04205147922039032,
-0.023132482543587685,
0.004443950951099396,
0.020012106746435165,
-0.015550980344414711,
-0.1352594643831253,
-0.010960935615003109,
0.015123913995921612,
-0.04994780197739601,
-0.018328625708818436,
0.08600804954767227,
-0.0007219492108561099,
0.08192374557256699,
0.01285834051668644,
0.032859403640031815,
-0.0065392991527915,
-0.010288855992257595,
-0.08782284706830978,
-0.024080593138933182,
0.024854756891727448,
0.07159384340047836,
-0.04308626055717468,
-0.0329701267182827,
-0.00694945827126503,
-0.0166462454944849,
-0.03980443999171257,
-0.07369375973939896,
0.02378552220761776,
-0.08301478624343872,
0.021766455844044685,
-0.010329662822186947,
0.0432761050760746,
0.021432936191558838,
-0.05813559889793396,
-0.07750394940376282,
-0.03363797813653946,
-0.01078842394053936,
-0.07683150470256805,
0.06635046750307083,
-0.012504946440458298,
0.0029551757033914328,
0.06707669794559479,
-0.050156887620687485,
0.055012837052345276,
-0.02095072902739048,
-0.007165582850575447,
-0.06814288347959518,
-0.022680573165416718,
0.003986152354627848,
-0.009807316586375237,
0.05321616306900978,
0.008156707510352135,
-0.012081224471330643,
0.11355075985193253,
0.11343858391046524,
0.11155366897583008,
-0.0662262812256813,
0.029756009578704834,
0.07482681423425674,
0.041274458169937134,
0.1079457625746727,
0.007057891692966223,
-0.043704621493816376,
-0.017788827419281006,
-0.01881512999534607,
0.04221518337726593,
0.0545957051217556,
0.030507590621709824,
-0.07174394279718399,
0.016496414318680763,
0.009453266859054565,
0.0028064814396202564,
0.02093111164867878,
-0.08348684757947922,
0.01074328925460577,
-0.12125924974679947,
-0.00805661641061306,
0.004057505168020725,
0.04493224248290062,
-0.030514225363731384,
-0.015253850258886814,
-0.07233672589063644,
-0.04229811951518059,
0.12823383510112762,
0.009073406457901001,
-0.08061747252941132,
-0.003412877442315221,
0.06808650493621826,
0.04492918774485588,
-0.15330462157726288,
-0.058487456291913986,
-0.04796180501580238,
0.03588813543319702,
-0.11594997346401215,
-0.018784265965223312,
-0.05255614221096039,
-0.11442545056343079,
-0.0120615903288126,
0.05119388550519943,
-0.019369667395949364,
-0.01927470788359642,
-0.019347183406352997,
0.030317995697259903,
0.025132933631539345,
3.469633941609189e-33,
-0.035454247146844864,
0.06371691823005676,
0.020066676661372185,
-0.02293628640472889,
0.011112638749182224,
-0.027133123949170113,
0.049825847148895264,
0.03553590923547745,
0.028754038736224174,
-0.0066169798374176025,
-0.15030667185783386,
0.041134510189294815,
-0.005853517912328243,
-0.057266369462013245,
0.046143267303705215,
0.03192756697535515,
0.011683299206197262,
0.05824001133441925,
-0.03617340698838234,
0.051300615072250366,
0.0569586344063282,
0.020267734304070473,
-0.00880614947527647,
-0.04317593201994896,
0.06021084636449814,
-0.01927933283150196,
-0.012178289704024792,
0.03390970826148987,
0.05745834484696388,
0.03899851813912392,
0.03148997575044632,
0.03719927370548248,
0.028769712895154953,
0.017407787963747978,
0.0193727295845747,
0.00408891448751092,
-0.0008311300771310925,
-0.05804570019245148,
0.05190398171544075,
-0.029278598725795746,
-0.007970325648784637,
0.09127818048000336,
0.1538103073835373,
0.09764941781759262,
-0.07759170979261398,
-0.00584760494530201,
0.048895567655563354,
0.0004818858578801155,
0.030229385942220688,
0.04956953600049019,
0.05828549712896347,
-0.015774454921483994,
0.003916309215128422,
0.011720662005245686,
0.03946342319250107,
0.013488877564668655,
0.05614422634243965,
0.01721090078353882,
0.06848964840173721,
0.02917269617319107,
-0.08430368453264236,
0.04401977360248566,
-0.020916659384965897,
-0.020783502608537674,
0.013458926230669022,
-0.03206245228648186,
0.031172258779406548,
-0.05608367547392845,
0.003344836411997676,
0.021029826253652573,
-0.05543188005685806,
0.03985095024108887,
0.08585382997989655,
0.035048507153987885,
-0.12853975594043732,
0.05968465283513069,
0.07732018828392029,
-0.03289484977722168,
0.03840816393494606,
-0.03584001213312149,
-0.05532032623887062,
-0.0232568196952343,
0.01672316901385784,
0.044506799429655075,
0.11586982756853104,
-0.0585428886115551,
-0.016003141179680824,
0.014626922085881233,
-0.006638803984969854,
0.08164775371551514,
0.02271033264696598,
-0.0007641307893209159,
0.0590037927031517,
0.02183452434837818,
-0.030573058873414993,
-5.475530929972942e-33,
-0.01696613058447838,
-0.028435278683900833,
-0.09681254625320435,
-0.052032679319381714,
-0.013959080912172794,
-0.019481617957353592,
0.025032831355929375,
-0.06979436427354813,
-0.05886108800768852,
-0.08137340098619461,
0.026029659435153008,
0.0063079954124987125,
0.03739199787378311,
0.04027643799781799,
-0.04051563888788223,
-0.025554176419973373,
-0.01458937581628561,
0.02530079521238804,
-0.005602363031357527,
-0.06381402909755707,
0.04659707844257355,
0.07024155557155609,
-0.021369250491261482,
-0.00313867861405015,
0.014663861133158207,
0.0048353769816458225,
0.07743440568447113,
0.022596245631575584,
0.005204949993640184,
-0.01548478752374649,
0.03595016151666641,
-0.020298421382904053,
-0.07456748187541962,
0.010779239237308502,
-0.08857790380716324,
0.017775390297174454,
0.07019317150115967,
-0.018104342743754387,
-0.0065896413289010525,
0.04585321992635727,
0.10569740831851959,
-0.008052523247897625,
-0.015987591817975044,
0.01165230106562376,
-0.048749860376119614,
0.024839092046022415,
-0.022965602576732635,
0.011932584457099438,
-0.056582268327474594,
0.009337975643575191,
-0.0732077956199646,
-0.034374237060546875,
-0.004209320526570082,
-0.0032616404350847006,
0.008604154922068119,
0.05488342419266701,
0.0009422937873750925,
-0.06728756427764893,
0.10566432774066925,
-0.03730246052145958,
0.0379372276365757,
0.08845388144254684,
-0.021623866632580757,
-0.012121914885938168,
-0.03899472579360008,
0.01821979135274887,
-0.018798010423779488,
-0.006829515099525452,
-0.04787762090563774,
-0.032711755484342575,
-0.11366771161556244,
-0.08470132946968079,
-0.04416728392243385,
-0.07432032376527786,
-0.02081487327814102,
-0.03690163418650627,
-0.05880965664982796,
-0.1519191712141037,
-0.024204092100262642,
0.032156143337488174,
0.01472433377057314,
0.023168666288256645,
-0.028900794684886932,
-0.026907067745923996,
-0.005634122062474489,
0.10806054621934891,
0.04968036711215973,
0.024069122970104218,
0.0014520783443003893,
-0.017950426787137985,
-0.06542782485485077,
-0.08489642292261124,
-0.007000063080340624,
-0.012282297946512699,
-0.04209917411208153,
-5.4793652282114635e-8,
0.031194962561130524,
0.059206072241067886,
0.028120532631874084,
-0.04368438944220543,
-0.000831026874948293,
-0.02369851805269718,
-0.0710042417049408,
-0.012502552010118961,
0.05736399441957474,
-0.03050934709608555,
0.06370440125465393,
0.036724865436553955,
-0.06923124194145203,
-0.09238484501838684,
0.05563873425126076,
-0.04738349840044975,
0.025302184745669365,
0.040128447115421295,
-0.09615843743085861,
-0.10374447703361511,
-0.0003057702269870788,
0.021796487271785736,
-0.06767057627439499,
0.07192537933588028,
-0.016680900007486343,
0.035974591970443726,
-0.006233740132302046,
0.036073509603738785,
-0.0005594705580733716,
0.02825036272406578,
-0.014812733978033066,
0.06598251312971115,
-0.0159488245844841,
0.03282018378376961,
0.032465897500514984,
-0.011296956799924374,
0.02264406532049179,
-0.03145131841301918,
0.0706830695271492,
0.030774803832173347,
-0.029702793806791306,
0.046469252556562424,
-0.02434643730521202,
0.07387075573205948,
0.021449150517582893,
0.01879117637872696,
0.024027498438954353,
-0.022078970447182655,
0.00532407546415925,
-0.07939694821834564,
0.021746963262557983,
-0.02475070208311081,
-0.02959488518536091,
0.08377732336521149,
0.016125664114952087,
0.033911071717739105,
-0.016350558027625084,
-0.11042516678571701,
-0.03815324977040291,
0.08510250598192215,
-0.09084025770425797,
-0.07957419008016586,
0.02696901001036167,
0.06254128366708755
] | {
"pdf_file": "BQCOYOZ4JLHHZV4764GRWDBITIJ2KYZV.pdf",
"text": "Hoyer Praises Appointment of Mary Lacey as Program Executive Officer for the National Security Personnel System\nWASHINGTON, DC - Congressman Steny Hoyer released the following statement today\nfollowing the Department of Defense announcement that Mary E. Lacey, currently the technical\ndirector of the Naval Surface Warfare Center of the Naval Sea Systems Command, and\nformerly the Executive Director of the Naval Surface Warfare Center, Indian Head, Maryland,\nDivision, has been appointed as the program executive officer for the National Security\nPersonnel System (NSPS) by Secretary of the Navy Gordon England. \n \n\"Secretary England made an outstanding choice today in appointing Mary Lacey as one of his\ntop advisors and head of the NSPS Program Executive Office. As a personal friend, I have long\nwitnessed Mary's impressive leadership ability and unmatched expertise in her field. I am\nespecially grateful for her tremendous contributions to our region through her work at Indian\nHead and NAVSEA. \n \n\"Mary will unquestionably be missed by the men and women who served with her at Indian\nHead and the thousands of civilian employees who have benefited from her work on their\nbehalf. Mary is currently manages over 16,000 employees - more than 9,000 of whom are\ncurrently in one of the Department of Defense's personnel demonstration projects. \n \n\"I have no doubt that in her new position, she will be able to use her substantial experience and\nvaluable insight to ensure that our robust civilian workforce has the tools and resources they\nneed to continue the important work they are doing to protect our nation. \n \n\"We are very fortunate to have a native Marylander assuming this important post that will have\na major impact on the lives of the federal employees living in Southern Maryland. I am grateful\nthat Secretary England has recognized what an asset Mary is to our federal civilian workforce\nand look forward to continuing to work closely with her when she assumes her new position.\" \n \n# # # \n \n \n 1 / 1"
} |
[
-0.06442306935787201,
-0.04125818982720375,
0.05305648595094681,
-0.006515428889542818,
0.013278291560709476,
0.06220734864473343,
-0.014660348184406757,
-0.05196810141205788,
-0.09563655406236649,
0.015364914201200008,
0.05765479430556297,
0.006615643389523029,
0.058366790413856506,
-0.06963843107223511,
-0.05970184877514839,
0.010630114004015923,
0.04840899631381035,
0.0024708809796720743,
-0.013100567273795605,
-0.07364914566278458,
-0.017771484330296516,
0.024889184162020683,
-0.005493889097124338,
-0.11231233924627304,
0.10900638997554779,
0.005757197737693787,
0.0032490380108356476,
-0.02014590986073017,
-0.016136514022946358,
0.02541263960301876,
0.04036697745323181,
0.05597904697060585,
0.02235419489443302,
-0.043547239154577255,
0.08047474920749664,
0.04158548638224602,
-0.006444540340453386,
0.045165881514549255,
0.0553428940474987,
-0.004162958357483149,
-0.02427731081843376,
-0.0036850993055850267,
-0.05047086998820305,
-0.031656306236982346,
-0.04536319151520729,
-0.10170851647853851,
0.01941584423184395,
-0.04292377084493637,
0.03957151994109154,
-0.021850919350981712,
-0.004961194004863501,
0.07683561742305756,
0.07394628971815109,
0.040302958339452744,
0.04316704720258713,
-0.05467083305120468,
-0.0699441209435463,
-0.06153697520494461,
-0.05376462638378143,
-0.01689145714044571,
0.04165097326040268,
-0.031020471826195717,
-0.00800877995789051,
-0.07483235746622086,
-0.0435301810503006,
0.020018771290779114,
-0.052020225673913956,
-0.0646582767367363,
-0.01467785146087408,
-0.08311279863119125,
0.015885816887021065,
-0.013206452131271362,
-0.05686824768781662,
-0.039903704077005386,
0.052759140729904175,
-0.028587564826011658,
0.0567963570356369,
0.11066259443759918,
0.03748680278658867,
-0.10260655730962753,
-0.041039060801267624,
-0.0667710155248642,
-0.0389837883412838,
-0.025187578052282333,
-0.16361631453037262,
0.025665322318673134,
-0.03747602924704552,
-0.0005460685933940113,
0.017212403938174248,
0.10102041810750961,
0.05746520683169365,
0.0052339439280331135,
-0.024776799604296684,
-0.06018385663628578,
0.0015453915111720562,
-0.044734008610248566,
0.024098845198750496,
0.021772172302007675,
0.06717872619628906,
0.0475056916475296,
-0.0016425494104623795,
0.06070709228515625,
0.06323768198490143,
-0.07660109549760818,
-0.04993637651205063,
-0.05246765911579132,
-0.022460652515292168,
-0.003095666179433465,
-0.041338466107845306,
-0.02368449606001377,
0.09510496258735657,
-0.014007867313921452,
-0.005608531180769205,
0.054175965487957,
0.03761923685669899,
0.08879796415567398,
-0.07027056813240051,
0.027023611590266228,
0.003595902118831873,
0.08419256657361984,
0.04477974772453308,
0.08243436366319656,
-0.058935344219207764,
0.06405769288539886,
-0.04191996157169342,
-0.006537582725286484,
-0.06408955156803131,
2.426813597402382e-33,
0.08924524486064911,
0.028336871415376663,
-0.054122909903526306,
0.047535866498947144,
0.010633008554577827,
-0.007661602925509214,
-0.05764583870768547,
-0.0728737860918045,
-0.0008758907206356525,
-0.0459846630692482,
-0.053325749933719635,
-0.006424070801585913,
0.022887589409947395,
-0.023972149938344955,
0.0009878656128421426,
-0.03567759692668915,
-0.08813320100307465,
-0.015542776323854923,
-0.0665484294295311,
-0.0030349786393344402,
0.02812620997428894,
0.055793751031160355,
-0.06516913324594498,
0.019402723759412766,
0.05177365615963936,
0.04064440354704857,
0.0002812273451127112,
0.040285974740982056,
0.0006504448829218745,
0.031020795926451683,
-0.06915847212076187,
0.0816614031791687,
0.015913115814328194,
-0.02850789576768875,
-0.0056763989850878716,
0.06615974009037018,
0.006607195362448692,
-0.031919803470373154,
0.013121075928211212,
-0.04431005194783211,
-0.05308709293603897,
0.07124152779579163,
0.007763195317238569,
0.027716660872101784,
0.014532666653394699,
-0.03510631248354912,
0.06759762763977051,
-0.0010157967917621136,
0.0343267023563385,
0.0749736875295639,
-0.01934848539531231,
-0.002874151337891817,
0.07723881304264069,
-0.06909786909818649,
-0.081255704164505,
-0.022991269826889038,
-0.0345638208091259,
-0.030917692929506302,
0.0809330940246582,
0.044708285480737686,
0.030376993119716644,
-0.041336655616760254,
-0.001083509880118072,
0.034355998039245605,
0.01856491155922413,
-0.0038257380947470665,
0.03781796246767044,
0.00684931268915534,
0.07766574621200562,
0.032421499490737915,
0.024685153737664223,
-0.010257982648909092,
0.04957948252558708,
-0.07228673249483109,
0.030072934925556183,
0.0018117601284757257,
0.08929087221622467,
-0.025792397558689117,
-0.04385332018136978,
0.035549674183130264,
-0.05634712427854538,
-0.04552071914076805,
-0.0255797877907753,
-0.10342493653297424,
0.1609906405210495,
0.08892352133989334,
-0.03449210152029991,
-0.07753762602806091,
0.0785917118191719,
-0.00034554515150375664,
-0.022578511387109756,
0.046772126108407974,
-0.047058265656232834,
0.004505434073507786,
0.05167147144675255,
-5.4000046832486406e-33,
0.026195719838142395,
0.02909826673567295,
-0.02622506394982338,
-0.02906377799808979,
-0.026590362191200256,
-0.0338914655148983,
0.020860495045781136,
-0.04075474292039871,
0.0030735337641090155,
-0.09549150615930557,
-0.06532946974039078,
-0.04509318247437477,
-0.027494458481669426,
0.010685783810913563,
-0.03804541751742363,
0.0006307973526418209,
0.0021852676291018724,
0.05242359638214111,
-0.09668183326721191,
-0.0004599172680173069,
-0.06796693801879883,
0.009270279668271542,
-0.015178526751697063,
0.13152725994586945,
0.04710732400417328,
0.029439730569720268,
-0.0737239345908165,
-0.05103180557489395,
-0.030961589887738228,
0.02124338410794735,
-0.032630760222673416,
-0.09814714640378952,
-0.04049551486968994,
0.1087261438369751,
-0.019958464428782463,
0.018713301047682762,
0.0010839877650141716,
-0.014731536619365215,
-0.00004486942998482846,
0.030385330319404602,
0.08655565232038498,
-0.05062313750386238,
0.009135550819337368,
0.08071236312389374,
-0.08847898244857788,
-0.043065451085567474,
0.08355294913053513,
-0.0019001472974196076,
-0.07388144731521606,
-0.0247113686054945,
0.021805262193083763,
-0.002068926114588976,
-0.05371840298175812,
0.02287796512246132,
-0.0012781521072611213,
0.04809703677892685,
0.15541817247867584,
0.0061726500280201435,
-0.06775657087564468,
0.040306612849235535,
0.014288273639976978,
0.0685533806681633,
0.054290544241666794,
0.07130758464336395,
0.036737918853759766,
-0.05841090530157089,
0.010884225368499756,
-0.08249562233686447,
0.01651330105960369,
-0.03131677582859993,
-0.030181322246789932,
-0.07281729578971863,
-0.004935632925480604,
-0.042787425220012665,
0.003499111160635948,
0.03661021962761879,
0.0072957309894263744,
0.09244807064533234,
-0.0931510329246521,
0.06591775268316269,
0.011771738529205322,
-0.04846927151083946,
-0.05310073494911194,
-0.03825150430202484,
-0.030907731503248215,
0.03539211302995682,
-0.005277600139379501,
0.022163812071084976,
0.05655815079808235,
0.07659177482128143,
-0.1022099032998085,
0.0052660489454865456,
-0.06354448944330215,
0.0029301720205694437,
-0.0450282096862793,
-4.5502684287157535e-8,
0.010458594188094139,
0.036242127418518066,
-0.1159568578004837,
0.061664290726184845,
-0.015115230344235897,
-0.03546428680419922,
-0.03951980918645859,
0.061733826994895935,
-0.024409743025898933,
0.04356028884649277,
0.08634275943040848,
0.019210290163755417,
-0.08827289193868637,
-0.03984271362423897,
0.04843994975090027,
-0.023451758548617363,
-0.0073980665765702724,
0.06474681198596954,
-0.053657133132219315,
-0.036154605448246,
-0.027595853433012962,
-0.01461500022560358,
-0.010249163024127483,
0.06699305027723312,
0.003477543592453003,
-0.006213277578353882,
-0.04242487996816635,
0.1284703016281128,
0.006338696461170912,
-0.03394494205713272,
-0.01025371067225933,
-0.01577887497842312,
-0.04119906201958656,
-0.044386450201272964,
0.07224921882152557,
0.0046924687922000885,
-0.011429883539676666,
-0.019972754642367363,
0.07244420051574707,
0.024105606600642204,
-0.03047329932451248,
0.010325212962925434,
0.008245999924838543,
-0.016102945432066917,
-0.028756486251950264,
0.0038439976051449776,
-0.12573526799678802,
-0.0035176321398466825,
0.07893195003271103,
-0.057293474674224854,
-0.039951227605342865,
0.010209628380835056,
0.07113458216190338,
0.013601066544651985,
0.06370998919010162,
0.0802670270204544,
0.009264102205634117,
-0.025954553857445717,
0.017704738304018974,
-0.05359470844268799,
0.03126155585050583,
-0.04322824254631996,
-0.021273095160722733,
-0.0236804261803627
] | {
"pdf_file": "YMIVA7BMYFO2CPSIOO7XA2XMMGNCOOEP.pdf",
"text": "District 17 Job Creation Map\nTogether with local community leaders, Congressman Chet Edwards has worked hard in\nCongress to protect local jobs, spur economic growth and new job creation, and improve the \nquality of life for those across our district. Since 2006, Chet has had an impact on over\n11,150 jobs in the twelve county region of TX-17.\n \n \nOver 2,075 jobs have been created as a direct result of appropriations projects supported by\ncommunity leaders and funded by Chet since 2006. Independent economic impact research\nand business studies have estimated that more than \n6,050 jobs\nwill be created by major economic development projects that Chet has supported. Additionally,\nChet has worked to save over \n1,150 jobs \nthrough his work with federal agencies.\n \n \n \nThe Recovery Act has saved or created over 1,875 additional jobs in TX-17. The blue place\nmarker denotes Recovery Act projects.\n \n \nClick on a marker below for a summary of each job creation project:\n \n \nView Economic Development and Job Creation in TX-17 in a larger map \n 1 / 1"
} |
[
0.0847727358341217,
-0.05673949420452118,
0.033730458468198776,
-0.03876137360930443,
-0.04099573567509651,
0.1138964369893074,
-0.013264577835798264,
-0.0036554744001477957,
-0.021470215171575546,
0.04975001513957977,
0.046153586357831955,
-0.0211186483502388,
0.01210726983845234,
0.020859254524111748,
0.00006538094748975709,
0.08652715384960175,
0.049216292798519135,
-0.03146781772375107,
-0.053639404475688934,
-0.05209324136376381,
0.021400675177574158,
-0.003787318477407098,
-0.05795472487807274,
0.01425840426236391,
0.06872320175170898,
0.08232011646032333,
-0.07192306965589523,
-0.12113294750452042,
-0.005939864553511143,
0.01151601318269968,
-0.11252161115407944,
-0.006539285648614168,
0.021876448765397072,
0.01854037120938301,
0.019174305722117424,
0.09513770788908005,
0.1084953099489212,
0.047750573605298996,
0.05657447502017021,
0.040253546088933945,
-0.0844079852104187,
-0.061097707599401474,
0.027608389034867287,
-0.024105114862322807,
0.055296026170253754,
-0.02766641043126583,
-0.05572115257382393,
0.0004315870173741132,
-0.06208403781056404,
0.014940384775400162,
-0.08457989990711212,
-0.03398018330335617,
0.03517184033989906,
-0.019742591306567192,
-0.04378053545951843,
0.0035341503098607063,
0.04658215120434761,
0.008098293095827103,
0.0014947304734960198,
-0.06020611152052879,
-0.11026865243911743,
-0.004522248171269894,
-0.05485839396715164,
0.06777900457382202,
0.005383500829339027,
-0.039085399359464645,
-0.07042659819126129,
0.0022300102282315493,
-0.0259587150067091,
0.07597783952951431,
0.03523104265332222,
-0.024283288046717644,
0.06725567579269409,
0.026774950325489044,
0.05112212896347046,
-0.0012324703857302666,
0.03930502012372017,
-0.02284126915037632,
0.08308932930231094,
-0.01782333105802536,
0.07911433279514313,
-0.017006395384669304,
-0.026026075705885887,
-0.042062271386384964,
0.03013451397418976,
-0.0876166820526123,
0.015099328942596912,
-0.05447510629892349,
-0.03181762248277664,
-0.08530323207378387,
0.013869757764041424,
-0.008962493389844894,
0.021195465698838234,
0.06055852770805359,
0.12476881593465805,
0.04084932059049606,
-0.06125674396753311,
-0.010073654353618622,
0.00887819193303585,
0.055036760866642,
-0.0569668784737587,
0.07666302472352982,
-0.05938389152288437,
0.03751377388834953,
-0.096796415746212,
-0.06664211302995682,
0.02414144203066826,
0.011576913297176361,
-0.009694311767816544,
-0.10549914091825485,
0.06524672359228134,
0.02628825418651104,
0.005767408758401871,
0.06927026063203812,
0.07015201449394226,
-0.050945937633514404,
0.041446272283792496,
0.057445548474788666,
-0.01876808889210224,
0.008786319755017757,
0.07510379701852798,
0.016637451946735382,
0.026231031864881516,
-0.009339596144855022,
0.016202764585614204,
-0.05150558799505234,
-0.009223060682415962,
-4.270063309914609e-33,
0.029956677928566933,
-0.03565741702914238,
-0.011875685304403305,
0.02924906648695469,
-0.023848548531532288,
-0.05550253391265869,
0.005995230749249458,
-0.02731788530945778,
0.0036647929809987545,
-0.060466621071100235,
-0.0161234550178051,
-0.029687650501728058,
0.01699215918779373,
0.018882326781749725,
0.0433645024895668,
-0.011382779106497765,
0.017010431736707687,
0.0022282316349446774,
-0.061051394790410995,
0.04808535426855087,
0.02721131406724453,
0.06421126425266266,
0.020484870299696922,
-0.051934272050857544,
-0.08851388096809387,
0.03168097883462906,
0.08039546012878418,
-0.07821137458086014,
-0.01639898307621479,
0.00593201071023941,
0.029343346133828163,
0.004364573862403631,
-0.14964069426059723,
0.04976540803909302,
-0.013571406714618206,
-0.055186428129673004,
0.03387889638543129,
-0.0685746967792511,
0.10853380709886551,
-0.03008873201906681,
-0.034416183829307556,
0.04410065338015556,
0.07010500878095627,
0.0011691311374306679,
-0.03726822882890701,
0.09108823537826538,
-0.011909368447959423,
0.019611496478319168,
0.04438204690814018,
0.03971236199140549,
-0.06698637455701828,
-0.00966502632945776,
-0.06576558947563171,
-0.07684333622455597,
0.0889623835682869,
0.021932799369096756,
0.03750042989850044,
0.09008516371250153,
0.01085551455616951,
-0.0388621985912323,
-0.06021462753415108,
0.03430292382836342,
-0.013524978421628475,
-0.053411323577165604,
-0.06074415519833565,
-0.03166689723730087,
-0.05877995118498802,
-0.09780275076627731,
0.14160190522670746,
-0.08673145622015,
-0.07787928730249405,
-0.012548125348985195,
-0.02988656610250473,
0.042332980781793594,
0.050133295357227325,
-0.028543071821331978,
0.07803109288215637,
-0.05552178993821144,
0.000752540654502809,
-0.003247613552957773,
0.025254560634493828,
0.020596381276845932,
0.006878208834677935,
-0.14653323590755463,
-0.018229568377137184,
-0.11580042541027069,
-0.0028124223463237286,
-0.0952550619840622,
0.0756777673959732,
0.009100926108658314,
-0.010420300997793674,
-0.013705085031688213,
-0.014235655777156353,
0.07052711397409439,
-0.04905996844172478,
-1.103259120938304e-33,
0.027643991634249687,
-0.014324747025966644,
-0.07135488837957382,
0.020126061514019966,
-0.019562724977731705,
0.02884591370820999,
0.034876033663749695,
-0.034331806004047394,
0.003872498171404004,
-0.0364181213080883,
-0.007260551676154137,
0.057178329676389694,
-0.02116136997938156,
0.011868908070027828,
0.032636795192956924,
-0.06517414003610611,
0.0984245240688324,
0.00456245569512248,
-0.05082777887582779,
-0.030539952218532562,
0.07113861292600632,
0.0792727842926979,
-0.04003594443202019,
0.016116920858621597,
-0.06191011145710945,
-0.027453647926449776,
-0.02462664246559143,
-0.034794703125953674,
-0.05269615724682808,
0.014794742688536644,
0.08428744226694107,
-0.05356208235025406,
-0.03488844633102417,
-0.01694350317120552,
-0.0372973307967186,
-0.008713020011782646,
0.027578864246606827,
-0.042190928012132645,
-0.09303288906812668,
0.07736091315746307,
0.05005056411027908,
0.0004587539006024599,
-0.02495003677904606,
-0.019132154062390327,
0.06633374840021133,
0.039466533809900284,
-0.026117460802197456,
-0.036549847573041916,
-0.023941878229379654,
0.03861164674162865,
-0.04021764174103737,
-0.017663925886154175,
-0.05599859729409218,
-0.03657084330916405,
0.03027399815618992,
-0.040895476937294006,
0.05974086746573448,
-0.08096246421337128,
-0.06735343486070633,
0.030838606879115105,
0.0113406702876091,
0.04400912672281265,
0.019372137263417244,
-0.022584252059459686,
0.0230682622641325,
-0.0411643385887146,
-0.08147511631250381,
-0.02855134755373001,
0.015303282998502254,
0.005663569550961256,
-0.06963087618350983,
0.046530235558748245,
-0.03675517812371254,
-0.020584996789693832,
0.009881404228508472,
-0.0022151307202875614,
-0.058144934475421906,
-0.06410222500562668,
-0.04961733892560005,
0.03482816368341446,
-0.04562775045633316,
0.025190705433487892,
0.012440044432878494,
-0.03484584018588066,
-0.029910143464803696,
0.045708198100328445,
0.06420642137527466,
0.016431959345936775,
0.02528168261051178,
-0.03224136307835579,
0.057071834802627563,
0.014272142201662064,
0.005015864036977291,
-0.03150133043527603,
0.07310330867767334,
-6.487208281669155e-8,
-0.03901869058609009,
0.05002008378505707,
0.01818777061998844,
0.044502366334199905,
-0.05359800532460213,
-0.04264148324728012,
-0.002363060135394335,
-0.018713785335421562,
-0.014866125769913197,
0.03494822606444359,
0.03873375803232193,
-0.053082529455423355,
-0.043452974408864975,
-0.09368151426315308,
0.041360896080732346,
0.04328469559550285,
-0.03581682965159416,
0.018526993691921234,
-0.015731152147054672,
-0.047947488725185394,
0.08003051578998566,
0.0430738739669323,
0.014251693151891232,
0.03466438874602318,
-0.0965900644659996,
0.014145351015031338,
0.029741834849119186,
-0.007796524092555046,
-0.07797346264123917,
0.01835854910314083,
0.0024064858444035053,
0.07102282345294952,
-0.024939270690083504,
-0.07727295905351639,
-0.005688556469976902,
0.02721254527568817,
-0.04566710814833641,
0.05003313347697258,
0.10148186981678009,
0.1448364108800888,
-0.0015156468143686652,
-0.09039104729890823,
0.05226290225982666,
0.0944422036409378,
0.09197048842906952,
-0.002651273738592863,
-0.07006409764289856,
-0.007985402829945087,
0.08058718591928482,
-0.06505976617336273,
0.00837127398699522,
-0.04740447178483009,
-0.07679025828838348,
-0.005325018428266048,
0.05796064808964729,
0.04531419649720192,
-0.05512925237417221,
-0.008817317895591259,
-0.038407884538173676,
0.00892711989581585,
0.0694248154759407,
0.004849473480135202,
-0.03638135641813278,
0.04074668884277344
] | {
"pdf_file": "TMLSWMKGDE2PLE3QSREAPVVCNK7QXPRC.pdf",
"text": " 44-21-01-06-0003 March 19, 2004 \nWarwick Valley Middle School \n 1The University of the State of New York \nThe State Education Department \n \n \n \nOVERVIEW OF SCHOOL PERFORMANCE IN \n ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, AND SCIENCE \nAND \nANALYSIS OF STUDENT SUBGROUP PERFORMANCE \nfor \n \nWWaarrwwiicckk VVaalllleeyy MMiiddddllee SScchhooooll \n \nin \n \nWWaarrwwiicckk VVaalllleeyy CCeennttrraall SScchhooooll DDiissttrriicctt \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \nFebruary 2004 44-21-01-06-0003 March 19, 2004 \nWarwick Valley Middle School \n 2THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK \n \nRegents of The University \n \nROBERT M. B ENNETT , Chancellor, B.A., M.S. ................................................................ Tonawanda \nADELAIDE L. S ANFORD , Vice Chancellor, B.A., M.A., P.D. .......................................... Hollis \nDIANE O’N EILL MCGIVERN , B.S.N., M.A., Ph.D. . ....................................................... Staten Island \nSAUL B. C OHEN , B.A., M.A., Ph.D. ................................................................................ New Rochelle \nJAMES C. D AWSON , A.A., B.A., M.S., Ph.D. ................................................................. Peru \nROBERT M. J OHNSON , B.S., J.D. ...................................................................................... Huntington \nANTHONY S. B OTTAR , B.A., J.D. .................................................................................... North Syracuse \nMERRYL H. T ISCH , B.A., M.A. ........................................................................................ New York \nGERALDINE D. C HAPEY , B.A., M.A., Ed.D. ................................................................... Belle Harbor \nARNOLD B. G ARDNER , B.A., LL.B................................................................................... Buffalo \nHARRY PHILLIPS , 3rd, B.A., M.S.F.S. ............................................................................. Hartsdale \nJOSEPH E. B OWMAN , JR., B.A., M.L.S., M.A., M.Ed., Ed.D .......................................... Albany \nLORRAINE A. C ORTÉS -VÁZQUEZ , B.A., M.P.A. ............................................................. Bronx \nJUDITH O. R UBIN , A.B. .................................................................................................... New York \nJAMES R. T ALLON , JR., B.A., M.A. ................................................................................. Binghamton \nMILTON L. C OFIELD , B.S., M.B.A., Ph .D. ...................................................................... Rochester \n \nPresident of The University and Commissioner of Education \nRICHARD P. M ILLS \n \nDeputy Commissioner for Elementary, Midd le, Secondary and Continuing Education \nJAMES A. K ADAMUS \n \nCoordinator, School Operations and Management Services \nCHARLES SZUBERLA \n \nCoordinator, Information and Reporting Services \nMARTHA P. M USSER \n \nThe State Education Department does not discriminate on the basis of age, color, religion, creed, disability, marital \nstatus, veteran status, national origin, race, gender, genetic pr edisposition or carrier status, or sexual orientation in its \neducational programs, services and activities. Portions of this publication can be made available in a variety of \nformats, including braille, large print or audio tape, up on request. Inquiries concerning this policy of \nnondiscrimination should be directed to the Department’s Office for Diversity, Ethics, and Access, Room 530, Education Building, Albany, NY 12234. Requests for additional copies of th is publication may be made by \ncontacting the Publications Sales Desk, Room 309, Education Building, Albany, NY 12234. \n \nPlease address all correspondence about this report that is not related to data corrections to: \n \nSchool Report Card Coordinator \nInformation and Reporting Services Team \nNew York State Education Department Room 863 EBA \n89 Washington Avenue \nAlbany, NY 12234 E-mail: RPTCARD@mail.nysed.gov 44-21-01-06-0003 March 19, 2004 \nWarwick Valley Middle School \n 3 The New York State School Report Card is an important part of the Board of Regents \neffort to raise learning standards for all students. It provides information to the public on student \nperformance and other measures of school and dist rict performance. Know ledge gained from the \nschool report card on a sc hool’s strengths and weaknesses can be used to improve instruction and \nservices to students. \nThe New York State School Report Card consists of three parts: the Overview of School \nPerformance in English Language Ar ts, Mathematics, and Science and Analysis of Student \nSubgroup Performance, the Comprehensive Information Report, and the School Accountability \nReport . The Overview and Analysis presents performance data on measures required by the \nfederal No Child Left Behind Act: English, mathematics, science, and graduation rate. \nPerformance data on other State assessments can be found in the Comprehensive Information \nReport . The School Accountability Report provides information as to whether a school is making \nadequate progress toward enab ling all students to achieve proficiency in English and \nmathematics. \nState assessments are designed to help en sure that all students reach high learning \nstandards. They show whether students are getting the foundation know ledge they need to \nsucceed at the elementary, middle, and commen cement levels and beyond. The State requires \nthat students who are not making appropriate pr ogress toward the standards receive academic \nintervention services. \nIn the Overview , performance on the elementary- and middle-level assessments in \nEnglish language arts and mathem atics and on the middle-level science test is reported in terms \nof mean scores and the percentage of students sc oring at each of the four levels. These levels \nindicate performance on the standards from se riously deficient to advanced proficiency. \nPerformance on the elementary-level science test is reported in terms of mean scores and the \npercentage of students making a ppropriate progress. Regents examination scores are reported in \nfour score ranges. Scores of 65 to 100 are passing; scores of 55 to 64 earn credit toward a local \ndiploma (with the approval of the local board of education). Though each elementary- and \nmiddle-level assessment is administered to st udents in a specific gr ade, secondary-level \nassessments are taken by students when they comp lete the coursework for the core curriculum. \nTherefore, the performance of students at the se condary level is measured for a student cohort \nrather than a group of students at a particular grade level. Students are grouped in cohorts \naccording to the year in which they first entered grade 9. \nThe assessment data in the Overview and Analysis are for all tested students in the school, \nincluding general-education students a nd students with disabilities. In the Overview , each \nschool’s performance is compared with that of school s similar in grade level, district resources, \nand student needs as indicated by income and limited English proficiency (LEP) status. Each \ndistrict’s performance is compared w ith that of all public schools statewide. In the Analysis , \nperformance is disaggregated by race/ethnicity, di sability status, gender, LEP status, income \nlevel, and migrant status. \nExplanations of terms referred to or symbols used in this part of the school report card \nmay be found in the glossary on the last page. Further information on th e school report card may \nbe found in the guide, Understanding Your School Report Card: February 2004 , available on the \nInformation and Reporting Services Web site at www.emsc.nysed.gov/irts. \n 44-21-01-06-0003 March 19, 2004 \nWarwick Valley Middle School \n 4Overview of School Performance \nin English Language Arts, Mathematics, and Science \n \nSchool Profile \n \nPrincipal: Ann Val Phone: (845)987-3100 \nGrade Range Student Enrollment Organization \n2002–03 6-8 1155 \n \n \n2001–02 School District-wide To tal Expenditure per Pupil $11,207 \n \n \nSimilar \nSchools \nGroup This school is in Similar Schools Group 31. All schools in this group are middle leve l schools in school districts \nwith average student needs in relation to district resour ce capacity. The schools in this group are in the lower \nrange of student needs for middle level schools in these districts. \n2002–03 Percentage of Core Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers* \nNumber of Core \nClasses Percent Taught \nby Highly \nQualified \nTeachers \n276 100% \n*For the 2002-03 school year, SED is reporting that teachers of core classes are highly qua lified if they are certified \nto teach those classes. However, No Child Left Behind (NCLB) imposes requirements beyond certification for some \nteachers to be considered highly qualified. In future year s, when New York State uses the NCLB criteria for reporting, \ncertified teachers must fulfill all NCLB requi rements to be counted as highly qualified. \n \n \n2002–03 Percentage of Teachers with No Valid Teaching Certificate* \nNumber of \nTeachers Percent with No \nValid Teaching \nCertificate \n81 0% \n*This count includes teachers with temporary licenses who do not have a valid permanent, provisional, or transitional \nteaching certificate. 44-21-01-06-0003 March 19, 2004 \nWarwick Valley Middle School \n 5 \nMiddle Level \nEnglish Language Arts \n \n2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 \n \n \nCounts of Students Tested \nPerformance at \nThis School Level 1 \n527–661 Level 2 \n662–700 Level 3 \n701–738 Level 4 \n739–830 Total Mean Score \nMay 2001 9 110 167 65 351 714 \n Level 1 \n527–659 Level 2 \n660–698 Level 3 \n699-737 Level 3 \n738-830 Total \nMarch 2002 4 78 156 111 349 723 \n Level 1 \n527–657 Level 2 \n658–696 Level 3 \n697–736 Level 4 \n737–830 Total \nJanuary 2003 11 106 226 72 415 713 \n \nMiddle-Level English Language Arts Levels — Listening, Reading, and Writing Standards \nLevel 4 These students exceed the standards and are moving toward high performance on the Regents examination. \nLevel 3 These students meet the standards and, with continued steady growth, should pass the Regents examination. \nLevel 2 These students need extra help to meet the standards and pass the Regents examination. \nLevel 1 These students have serious academic deficiencies . \nPerformance of Limited English Proficient Students Taking the New York State \nEnglish as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) as the Measure \nof English Language Arts Achievement \nGrade 8 Number \n Tested Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 \n2003 1 # # # # \nPerformance of Students with Severe Disabilities on the New York State \nAlternate Assessment (NYSAA) in English \nGrade 8 Number \nTested AA–Level 1 AA–Level 2 AA–Level 3 AA–Level 4 \n2002–03 0 0 0 0 0 Grade 8 English Language Arts Performance \n (All Students: General Education and Students with Disabilities ) \n19%31%\n3%48%\n22%45%\n32%\n1%17%54%\n26%\n3%\n0%20%40%60%80%100%\nLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 414%36%\n5%44%\n37%46%\n15%\n2%11%50%\n36%\n3%\n0%20%40%60%80%100%\nLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4This School Similar Schools 44-21-01-06-0003 March 19, 2004 \nWarwick Valley Middle School \n 6 \nMiddle Level \nMathematics \n \n2000-01 2001-02 2002-03\n \n \n \nCounts of Students Tested \nPerformance at \nThis School Level 1 \n517–680 Level 2 \n681–715 Level 3 \n716–759 Level 4 \n760–882 Total Mean Score \nMay 2001 45 115 156 34 350 717 \nMay 2002 29 89 170 61 349 727 \nMay 2003 30 114 216 55 415 725 \n \nMiddle-Level Mathematics Levels — Knowledge, Reasoning, and Problem-Solving Standards \nLevel 4 These students exceed the standards and are moving toward high performance on the Regents examination. \nLevel 3 These students meet the standards and, with continued steady growth, should pass the Regents examination. \nLevel 2 These students need extra help to meet the standards and pass the Regents examination. \nLevel 1 These students have serious academic deficiencies . \n \nPerformance of Students with Severe Disabilities on the New York State \nAlternate Assessment (NYSAA) in Mathematics \nMiddle Level Number \nTested AA–Level 1 AA–Level 2 AA–Level 3 AA–Level 4 \n2002–03 0 0 0 0 0 \n Grade 8 Mathematics Performance \n (All Students: General Education and Students with Disabilities ) \n10%33%\n13%45%\n26%49%\n17%\n8%13%52%\n27%\n7%\n0%20%40%60%80%100%\nLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 412%33%\n11%44%\n28%49%\n15%\n7%14%56%\n25%\n5%\n0%20%40%60%80%100%\nLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4This School Similar Schools 44-21-01-06-0003 March 19, 2004 \nWarwick Valley Middle School \n 7Middle Level \nScience \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \n \nCounts of Students Tested Performance at This School \nLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Total Mean Score \nMiddle-Level Science 2 16 124 197 339 84 \nJune 2002 \nRegents Science 0 0 0 0 0 0 \nMiddle-Level Science 2 27 180 184 393 82 January/ \nJune 2003 Regents Science 0 0 0 0 0 0 \n \nMiddle-Level Science Levels — Knowledge, Re asoning, and Problem-Solving Standards* \nLevel 4 These students exceed the standards on the middle-level science test and are moving toward high performance \non the Regents examinations or score 85–100 on a Regents science examination. \nLevel 3 These students meet the standards on the middle-level science test and, with continued steady growth, should \npass the Regents examinations or score 65–84 on a Regents science examination. \nLevel 2 These students need extra help to meet the standards for middle-level science and to pass the Regents \nexaminations or score 55–64 on a Regents science examination. \nLevel 1 These students have serious academic deficiencies as evidenced in the middle-level science test or score 0–54 \non a Regents science examination. \n \n*Students may demonstrate proficiency in middle-level science by scoring at Level 3 or above on the \nmiddle-level science test or by scoring 65 or above on a Regents examination in science. \n \nPerformance of Students with Severe Disabilities on the New York State \nAlternate Assessment (NYSAA) in Science \nMiddle-Level Number \nTested AA–Level 1 AA–Level 2 AA–Level 3 AA–Level 4 \n2002–03 0 0 0 0 0 Middle-Level Science and Regents Science Performance \nof Middle-Level Students \n(All Students: General Educatio n and Students with Disabilities) \nThis School Similar Schools 58%\n5%1%37%\n7%46%47%\n1%0%20%40%60%80%100%\nLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 447%\n6%1%46%\n7%49%43%\n0%0%20%40%60%80%100%\nLevel 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 2001-02 2002-03 44-21-01-06-0003 March 19, 2004 \nWarwick Valley Middle School \n 8Analysis of Student Subgroup Performance \n \nHistorically, on State assessments the average performance of Black, Hispanic, and Native \nAmerican students has been lower than that of White and Asian students. Similarly, students from low-\nincome families have not performed as well as those fr om higher income families. A high priority of the \nBoard of Regents is to eliminate these gaps in student performance. In addition, Title I of the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act includes explicit requirements “to ensure that students served by Title I are given the same opportunity to achieve to high standards and are held to the same high expectations as all students in each State.” \n \nThis section of the school report card provides performance data for two years by racial/ethnic \ngroup, disability status, gender, English proficiency status, income level, and migrant status. The purpose of the student subgroup analyses is to deter mine if students who perform below the standards \nin any school tend to fall into particular groups, such as minority students, limited English proficient students, or economically disadvantaged students. If thes e analyses provide evidence that students in \none of the groups achieve at a lower level than other students, the school and community should \nexamine the reasons for this lower performance and make necessary changes in curriculum, instruction, and student support services to remedy these performance gaps. If your school did not \nreport data for the 2002-03 school year for a subject and grade, a table showing data for subgroups in that subject and grade will not be included in the Analysis . 44-21-01-06-0003 March 19, 2004 \nWarwick Valley Middle School \n 9Middle Level \nEnglish Language Arts \n2001–02 2002–03 \nPercentages of Tested \nStudents Scoring at Levels Percentages of Tested \nStudents Scoring at Levels Student Subgroup Tested \n2–4 3–4 4 Tested \n2–4 3–4 4 \nResults by Race/Ethnicity \nAmerican Indian/Alaskan Native 0 0% 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0% \nBlack 9 s s s 15 s s s \nHispanic 3 s s s 18 94% 50% 0% \nAsian or Pacific Islander 0 0% 0% 0% 1 s s s \nWhite 337 99% 78% 33% 381 98% 75% 19% \nTotal 349 99% 77% 32% 415 97% 72% 17% \nSmall Group Totals (s) 12 83% 33% 0% 16 88% 25% 6% \nResults by Disability Status \nGeneral-education students 316 100% 82% 35% 373 100% 78% 19% \nStudents with disabilities 33 91% 21% 0% 42 76% 14% 0% \nTotal 349 99% 77% 32% 415 97% 72% 17% \nResults by Gender \nFemale 175 99% 78% 34% 200 98% 80% 24% \nMale 174 99% 75% 30% 215 97% 64% 11% \nTotal 349 99% 77% 32% 415 97% 72% 17% \nResults by English Proficiency Status \nEnglish proficient 349 99% 77% 32% 415 97% 72% 17% \nLimited English proficient 0 0% 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0% \nTotal 349 99% 77% 32% 415 97% 72% 17% \nResults by Income Level \nEconomically disadvantaged 20 90% 45% 5% 25 96% 68% 4% \nNot disadvantaged 329 99% 78% 33% 390 97% 72% 18% \nTotal 349 99% 77% 32% 415 97% 72% 17% \nResults by Migrant Status \nMigrant family 0 0% 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0% \nNot migrant family 349 99% 77% 32% 415 97% 72% 17% \nTotal 349 99% 77% 32% 415 97% 72% 17% \n 44-21-01-06-0003 March 19, 2004 \nWarwick Valley Middle School \n 10Middle Level \nMathematics \n2001–02 2002–03 \nPercentages of Tested \nStudents Scoring at Levels Percentages of Tested \nStudents Scoring at Levels Student Subgroup Tested \n2–4 3–4 4 Tested \n2–4 3–4 4 \nResults by Race/Ethnicity \nAmerican Indian/Alaskan Native 0 0% 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0% \nBlack 9 44% 22% 0% 14 s s s \nHispanic 4 s s s 21 81% 33% 0% \nAsian or Pacific Islander 1 s s s 1 s s s \nWhite 335 93% 68% 18% 379 94% 68% 15% \nTotal 349 92% 66% 17% 415 93% 65% 13% \nSmall Group Totals (s) 5 80% 40% 0% 15 73% 33% 0% \nResults by Disability Status \nGeneral-education students 317 97% 72% 19% 371 98% 71% 15% \nStudents with disabilities 32 38% 6% 0% 44 48% 16% 0% \nTotal 349 92% 66% 17% 415 93% 65% 13% \nResults by Gender \nFemale 175 92% 69% 15% 200 96% 68% 14% \nMale 174 91% 64% 20% 215 90% 63% 13% \nTotal 349 92% 66% 17% 415 93% 65% 13% \nResults by English Proficiency Status \nEnglish proficient 348 s s s 414 s s s \nLimited English proficient 1 s s s 1 s s s \nTotal 349 92% 66% 17% 415 93% 65% 13% \nResults by Income Level \nEconomically disadvantaged 19 74% 16% 5% 26 77% 42% 0% \nNot disadvantaged 330 93% 69% 18% 389 94% 67% 14% \nTotal 349 92% 66% 17% 415 93% 65% 13% \nResults by Migrant Status \nMigrant family 1 s s s 0 0% 0% 0% \nNot migrant family 348 s s s 415 93% 65% 13% \nTotal 349 92% 66% 17% 415 93% 65% 13% \n 44-21-01-06-0003 March 19, 2004 \nWarwick Valley Middle School \n 11Middle Level \nScience \n2001–02 2002–03 \nPercentages of Tested \nStudents Scoring at Levels Percentages of Tested \nStudents Scoring at Levels Student Subgroup Tested \n2–4 3–4 4 Tested \n2–4 3–4 4 \nResults by Race/Ethnicity \nAmerican Indian/Alaskan Native 0 0% 0% 0% 0 0% 0% 0% \nBlack 8 100% 50% 13% 12 s s s \nHispanic 4 s s s 19 100% 68% 11% \nAsian or Pacific Islander 1 s s s 1 s s s \nWhite 326 99% 96% 59% 361 99% 95% 50% \nTotal 339 99% 95% 58% 393 99% 93% 47% \nSmall Group Totals (s) 5 100% 80% 60% 13 100% 54% 15% \nResults by Disability Status \nGeneral-education students 309 100% 98% 63% 354 100% 96% 51% \nStudents with disabilities 30 93% 63% 10% 39 95% 64% 10% \nTotal 339 99% 95% 58% 393 99% 93% 47% \nResults by Gender \nFemale 169 99% 95% 55% 187 99% 92% 44% \nMale 170 99% 94% 61% 206 100% 93% 50% \nTotal 339 99% 95% 58% 393 99% 93% 47% \nResults by English Proficiency Status \nEnglish proficient 338 s s s 393 99% 93% 47% \nLimited English proficient 1 s s s 0 0% 0% 0% \nTotal 339 99% 95% 58% 393 99% 93% 47% \nResults by Income Level \nEconomically disadvantaged 16 88% 81% 31% 23 96% 83% 13% \nNot disadvantaged 323 100% 95% 59% 370 100% 93% 49% \nTotal 339 99% 95% 58% 393 99% 93% 47% \nResults by Migrant Status \nMigrant family 1 s s s 0 0% 0% 0% \nNot migrant family 338 s s s 393 99% 93% 47% \nTotal 339 99% 95% 58% 393 99% 93% 47% \n 44-21-01-06-0003 March 19, 2004 \nWarwick Valley Middle School \n 12Glossary \n \nAccountability Cohort: An accountability cohort is all students, regardless of grade status, who were enrolled in \nschool on BEDS day two years after the year in which they entered grade 9, or, in the case of ungraded students \nwith disabilities, the year in which they reached their seventeenth birthday. (For example, the 1998 accountability cohort consists of all students who first entered grade 9 in the fall of 1998 who were enrolled on October 4, 2000). Certain students with severe disabilities, new immigrants, and students who transfer to programs leading to a high school diploma or high school equivalency diploma are not included in the school accountability cohort. Cohort is defined in Section 100.2 (p) (8) of the Commissioner’s Regulations. \n \nComponent Retests: Component retests were offered in Regents English and Mathematics A to graduating \nseniors who were at risk of not meeting the State learning standards. Component retesting is the process by which \na student who has failed a Regents examination in English or Mathematics A twice is retested only on the areas of \nthe learning standards in which the student has been proven deficient. Component retesting eliminates the need for \nthe student to retake the full Regents examination multiple times. Students who earn credit through component retesting are counted as if they scored in the 55–64 range or in the 65–84 range, as determined by the results of the component retest. \n \nCounts of Students Tested: “Counts of Students Tested” includes only students who completed sufficient test \nquestions to receive a score. \n \nGraduation-Rate Cohort: Graduation-rate cohort for each year includes all students in the accountability cohort in \nthe previous year plus all students excluded from that accountability cohort solely because they transferred to a \ngeneral education development (GED) program. \nLimited English Proficient (LEP) Students: Schools provide special English instruction to students for whom \nEnglish is a second language so they can participate effectively in the academic program. In 2002–03 and in \nprevious years, students were considered LEP if, by reason of foreign birth or ancestry, they spoke a language \nother than English and (1) either understood and spoke little or no English or (2) scored at or below the 40\nth \npercentile on an English language assessment instrument. The United States Department of Education has approved the use of the New York State English as a Second Language Achievement Test (NYSESLAT) as the required measure of language arts proficiency for LEP students in grades 4 and 8 who have attended school in the United States (not including Puerto Rico) for fewer than three consecutive years and for LEP students who have attended for four or five years and have received an exemption from the general assessment requirement. \n \nNew York State Alternate Assessment (NYSAA): The district Committee on Special Education designates \nstudents with severe disabilities who meet criteria estab lished in Commissioner’s Regulations to take the New York \nState Alternate Assessment (NYSAA). \n \nSimilar Schools: Similar schools are schools that are grouped by common district and student demographic \ncharacteristics, including grade range of students served by the school, school district financial resources, and \nneeds of the school student population. More information about similar school groups may be found on the Web at http://www.emsc.nysed.gov/repcrd2002/similar.html. \n Student Confidentiality/Suppressed Data (# and s): To ensure student confidentiality, the Department does not\n \npublish data for groups with fewer than five students or data that would allow readers to easily determine the \nperformance of a group with fewer than five students. In the Overview, the pound character (#) appears when fewer \nthan five students in a group were tested. In the Analysis , when fewer than five students in a group (e.g., Hispanic) \nwere tested, percentages of tested students scoring at various levels are suppressed for that group and the next \nsmallest group. Suppressed data are indicated with an (s). However, the performance of tested students in these \ngroups is aggregated and shown in the Small Group Total row. \n \nValidity and Reliability of Small Group Data: It is important that programmatic decisions are based on valid and \nreliable data. Data for fewer than 30 students in a group may be neither valid nor reliable. If a school does not have \n30 students in a grade or a subgroup in a given year, the school should evaluate results for students in this group over a period of years to make programmatic decisions. \n "
} |
[
-0.11883839964866638,
0.04829868674278259,
-0.0025480559561401606,
-0.011011209338903427,
0.05195074528455734,
0.010291832499206066,
0.1154332384467125,
0.0007007909007370472,
-0.08592535555362701,
-0.07065396010875702,
0.0013317164266481996,
-0.035472381860017776,
0.018434155732393265,
-0.006737178191542625,
0.024402987211942673,
-0.029503243044018745,
-0.058138374239206314,
-0.05043954402208328,
-0.020765526220202446,
0.029036032035946846,
-0.06367600709199905,
0.024029914289712906,
0.0262432973831892,
-0.006037362851202488,
-0.011076544411480427,
-0.0014006864512339234,
-0.018619801849126816,
0.03277004510164261,
0.0028860096354037523,
-0.05694391578435898,
-0.04394163936376572,
0.025414075702428818,
0.08790954202413559,
-0.02499123103916645,
-0.03668315336108208,
0.0062413448467850685,
-0.06646791845560074,
-0.0671444833278656,
0.020564241334795952,
0.04238877445459366,
0.021880215033888817,
-0.04288247600197792,
-0.03437700495123863,
0.06146686151623726,
0.0656372681260109,
-0.0785202905535698,
0.029487011954188347,
0.010798297822475433,
0.06332410126924515,
-0.04508465901017189,
-0.01823394186794758,
-0.027721041813492775,
-0.0036737609189003706,
-0.03659451752901077,
0.054250262677669525,
-0.02085655927658081,
0.015034922398626804,
-0.060095224529504776,
0.016393909230828285,
-0.03323858231306076,
0.01750349812209606,
-0.0005952207720838487,
-0.16348379850387573,
0.08492093533277512,
-0.07583844661712646,
0.0161097701638937,
0.048382941633462906,
-0.007598146330565214,
-0.024985475465655327,
0.05949747934937477,
0.0658901110291481,
-0.03513742983341217,
0.0008843158720992506,
-0.11567969620227814,
0.049390342086553574,
0.03360460326075554,
0.055154237896203995,
0.026383694261312485,
0.053694359958171844,
0.038932498544454575,
0.0004393816343508661,
0.0180604699999094,
-0.09288253635168076,
-0.004073987249284983,
-0.0008234609267674387,
-0.04883106052875519,
-0.006677441764622927,
-0.023541681468486786,
-0.03813307359814644,
0.05245159938931465,
-0.042493823915719986,
-0.055899728089571,
0.08681583404541016,
-0.04896170645952225,
-0.08339672535657883,
-0.0457635223865509,
0.029042238369584084,
0.03465776517987251,
-0.08649188280105591,
0.4062184691429138,
0.03594949096441269,
0.018697189167141914,
0.0979783833026886,
-0.007865204475820065,
0.023714108392596245,
-0.05756505951285362,
-0.06109985336661339,
-0.006620500702410936,
0.007060033269226551,
0.021669859066605568,
-0.024405108764767647,
-0.033514637500047684,
0.00025015627034008503,
0.03170765936374664,
0.04407161846756935,
0.09463243186473846,
-0.035580113530159,
-0.0045343064703047276,
0.043714847415685654,
0.00020504710846580565,
-0.002858717693015933,
-0.024884076789021492,
0.0037606365513056517,
0.014041258953511715,
0.07781578600406647,
-0.1323145031929016,
0.0068764761090278625,
-7.2201250750405e-33,
0.007334581576287746,
0.002726183971390128,
0.012147537432610989,
-0.002440247917547822,
0.027932560071349144,
0.03927065059542656,
0.003743888111785054,
-0.04643532633781433,
-0.014492551796138287,
0.05360198765993118,
0.006590632256120443,
0.03664784133434296,
-0.023135676980018616,
0.03275369852781296,
0.07811082899570465,
0.009627518244087696,
0.007964123040437698,
0.0028742437716573477,
-0.0018807238666340709,
0.004691542126238346,
-0.012402275577187538,
-0.0008041393011808395,
-0.023038707673549652,
0.04297299310564995,
-0.028259985148906708,
-0.06694644689559937,
0.038539037108421326,
-0.07085712999105453,
0.020109260454773903,
0.001460324041545391,
0.0014639950823038816,
0.049912355840206146,
-0.02594558522105217,
0.0008223677286878228,
-0.03757276013493538,
-0.028740663081407547,
0.03337514027953148,
-0.07462829351425171,
-0.035983964800834656,
0.025680823251605034,
-0.050139084458351135,
0.010837196372449398,
-0.04243791848421097,
-0.002668545348569751,
-0.004916265141218901,
0.16647927463054657,
-0.0011541391722857952,
-0.004960660357028246,
-0.06482207775115967,
0.06976216286420822,
-0.0028182310052216053,
-0.02132517658174038,
-0.11613703519105911,
0.04333868995308876,
-0.0033509607892483473,
-0.020106570795178413,
0.016554009169340134,
-0.043971188366413116,
0.020619438961148262,
-0.009089959785342216,
0.009713641367852688,
0.039391469210386276,
-0.012487754225730896,
0.009350251406431198,
-0.08647788316011429,
-0.04851773753762245,
0.02447775937616825,
-0.008494960144162178,
0.023063570261001587,
-0.012638214975595474,
-0.05100997909903526,
0.03675990551710129,
0.03771744668483734,
0.030916057527065277,
-0.028798431158065796,
-0.01926880143582821,
-0.019831717014312744,
0.03583517670631409,
0.08063048869371414,
0.00649732630699873,
0.03545527532696724,
-0.041958946734666824,
0.006693818140774965,
-0.024078864604234695,
0.09502369910478592,
0.054634999483823776,
0.004220988135784864,
-0.05180729925632477,
0.01021517813205719,
-0.041098661720752716,
-0.03574559465050697,
0.06131820008158684,
-0.0030944310128688812,
0.08796171098947525,
0.006000818684697151,
4.4925641867161134e-33,
-0.07716735452413559,
0.01899317093193531,
-0.03573813661932945,
0.0887979194521904,
-0.01755509153008461,
-0.0027626880910247564,
0.037273939698934555,
0.09013677388429642,
-0.09250447154045105,
0.0680299699306488,
0.022390201687812805,
-0.045089662075042725,
0.030878892168402672,
0.044495198875665665,
-0.005799654871225357,
0.03523358702659607,
0.06968843936920166,
-0.004063474480062723,
-0.028155116364359856,
-0.03572935611009598,
-0.030507177114486694,
-0.03237851336598396,
-0.0024998304434120655,
0.034929435700178146,
-0.04148077219724655,
0.030205287039279938,
0.04858911409974098,
0.0632987916469574,
-0.021693143993616104,
0.036800533533096313,
0.03896567225456238,
-0.023581488057971,
-0.05063262954354286,
-0.05820295587182045,
0.04826247692108154,
0.08404397964477539,
0.03678114339709282,
-0.0007768925279378891,
0.024848245084285736,
-0.05051735043525696,
0.039668887853622437,
-0.010082785040140152,
0.002244437113404274,
0.11697717010974884,
-0.021961307153105736,
-0.005805923603475094,
-0.048092879354953766,
0.003788944333791733,
0.035172659903764725,
0.07729728519916534,
-0.09319712221622467,
-0.011992926709353924,
-0.021968109533190727,
0.04129430651664734,
-0.022958293557167053,
0.004160518292337656,
-0.0432187058031559,
0.0702132061123848,
-0.01905948668718338,
0.0004752702370751649,
0.005480603780597448,
0.026761434972286224,
-0.033612821251153946,
0.01346849836409092,
-0.022746674716472626,
0.03873894736170769,
-0.024523282423615456,
-0.03632815554738045,
-0.0017924589337781072,
-0.052569907158613205,
0.006689464673399925,
-0.025846485048532486,
-0.1348353624343872,
0.0011394252069294453,
-0.047169335186481476,
-0.05347497761249542,
-0.018427148461341858,
-0.007304163184016943,
-0.009657083079218864,
-0.037726134061813354,
-0.033999841660261154,
0.01841733604669571,
-0.008003143593668938,
-0.005512353032827377,
-0.03353199362754822,
-0.0201805979013443,
0.021665804088115692,
0.01075822301208973,
-0.05747472122311592,
0.01969684660434723,
-0.007240809965878725,
0.023037107661366463,
0.12023406475782394,
0.0032419958151876926,
0.010150063782930374,
-1.3403668397415913e-8,
-0.046724583953619,
0.04062063992023468,
-0.05561641603708267,
-0.0018853341462090611,
0.056323979049921036,
0.049638908356428146,
-0.04154156893491745,
0.0325038842856884,
0.02574923262000084,
-0.018780937418341637,
0.06920813769102097,
0.02598794549703598,
-0.02782331220805645,
0.05757509544491768,
0.09128093719482422,
-0.01532574463635683,
-0.10472093522548676,
-0.027585938572883606,
-0.016222817823290825,
-0.035399287939071655,
-0.010461363941431046,
-0.013999390415847301,
-0.0002939800324384123,
-0.08362972736358643,
0.007932317443192005,
0.006960071157664061,
-0.04422977939248085,
0.07475824654102325,
0.07440952211618423,
-0.04058071970939636,
-0.0018266832921653986,
0.01985001191496849,
0.014382191933691502,
0.020585300400853157,
0.02213379554450512,
-0.06437048316001892,
-0.06369856745004654,
0.01613914780318737,
0.009907381609082222,
-0.0055595203302800655,
-0.05467313155531883,
-0.0233115516602993,
0.07046928256750107,
0.006468005012720823,
-0.047700025141239166,
-0.0036470729392021894,
0.007837599143385887,
-0.004974569659680128,
-0.01241857185959816,
-0.07781214267015457,
-0.0009409073390997946,
-0.008002524264156818,
0.006034235469996929,
0.08434933423995972,
0.10730371624231339,
0.011427774094045162,
0.013366665691137314,
-0.012747352942824364,
0.061454374343156815,
0.03564131259918213,
0.1587459295988083,
0.12640950083732605,
0.04654904082417488,
-0.015717294067144394
] | {
"pdf_file": "4ANUUHOJ7LTWU4PYON2VXJMPPUGDYWPD.pdf",
"text": " "
} |
[
0.02346235141158104,
-0.06337358802556992,
0.00182827259413898,
0.07844268530607224,
0.03763093426823616,
0.014470726251602173,
-0.04592648521065712,
0.03159959241747856,
-0.06596680730581284,
-0.042830940335989,
0.007667622063308954,
0.0704934224486351,
-0.017810728400945663,
-0.029611140489578247,
-0.04096940532326698,
-0.08106248825788498,
0.02922571450471878,
-0.048583339899778366,
0.038846541196107864,
-0.017893776297569275,
0.022847915068268776,
-0.03657582774758339,
-0.005650050938129425,
-0.012433835305273533,
0.05289577692747116,
0.08441129326820374,
-0.023241572082042694,
0.05334094166755676,
0.009790651500225067,
0.015912167727947235,
-0.07606259733438492,
0.051460158079862595,
0.09077602624893188,
-0.015030373819172382,
0.09656732529401779,
-0.05134334787726402,
0.014754974283277988,
0.04266820102930069,
0.04429389163851738,
-0.001883291988633573,
0.05273101106286049,
-0.04017487168312073,
0.01609761454164982,
-0.027361944317817688,
-0.012128887698054314,
-0.001676800660789013,
-0.04705961421132088,
0.04262765124440193,
-0.005596304778009653,
0.08775581419467926,
0.07405108213424683,
0.08120756596326828,
0.01911393366754055,
0.029399488121271133,
0.013675348833203316,
0.07086683064699173,
-0.05457616597414017,
-0.05393063277006149,
0.0010384145425632596,
-0.004193323664367199,
-0.08181237429380417,
0.047344859689474106,
-0.07073839753866196,
0.037050653249025345,
0.013548619113862514,
0.07467172294855118,
-0.09696757793426514,
-0.06132888048887253,
-0.01940329745411873,
-0.08720377087593079,
-0.027114495635032654,
-0.02681080996990204,
-0.052661310881376266,
-0.02273152582347393,
0.08764480799436569,
-0.021399809047579765,
0.049360644072294235,
-0.08175292611122131,
-0.021009737625718117,
-0.040380094200372696,
0.027202531695365906,
-0.08803310245275497,
-0.007876060903072357,
0.08232354372739792,
-0.022384583950042725,
-0.032273028045892715,
0.05034294351935387,
0.019177012145519257,
0.003621121635660529,
-0.01686212047934532,
0.03217359632253647,
0.11018238216638565,
-0.07887076586484909,
-0.037107329815626144,
-0.02493562176823616,
0.00982162356376648,
-0.03797735273838043,
-0.01625525951385498,
-0.00500470120459795,
0.03913399577140808,
0.018562879413366318,
0.007856450974941254,
0.05393364652991295,
-0.009555211290717125,
-0.06415946781635284,
-0.11375726014375687,
0.007551886141300201,
0.011817410588264465,
-0.08246941864490509,
0.06012953817844391,
-0.04064194858074188,
-0.008187679573893547,
-0.015172304585576057,
-0.06780382990837097,
0.011121352203190327,
-0.08593928813934326,
-0.000656703719869256,
-0.0416235588490963,
0.06192469224333763,
-0.005651955027133226,
0.028368869796395302,
0.04986009746789932,
-0.05615077167749405,
0.07301625609397888,
0.01818704977631569,
-0.023281216621398926,
-0.023854613304138184,
3.387037831048661e-33,
-0.0727514997124672,
0.0366605743765831,
0.06550704687833786,
-0.07716938853263855,
-0.059854656457901,
-0.0015116115100681782,
0.06021847575902939,
-0.03325670212507248,
0.068423792719841,
0.0823550596833229,
-0.03150366619229317,
0.07220640778541565,
-0.018737975507974625,
-0.009477960877120495,
0.05242028459906578,
0.05299137905240059,
0.006008829455822706,
-0.010907658375799656,
0.014542759396135807,
-0.001918427529744804,
-0.023990703746676445,
-0.022861018776893616,
-0.00016838419833220541,
0.007717099040746689,
-0.04692833125591278,
-0.020204076543450356,
-0.035283975303173065,
0.05800189450383186,
0.054888371378183365,
-0.0003595869056880474,
0.07016104459762573,
0.05583256855607033,
0.07462430745363235,
0.041273053735494614,
-0.08632350713014603,
0.08751069754362106,
-0.030933741480112076,
-0.0029259026050567627,
-0.10085242241621017,
-0.01636621169745922,
-0.013245517387986183,
0.04487931355834007,
0.019408725202083588,
0.009170605801045895,
0.015954071655869484,
0.023388704285025597,
-0.007570451591163874,
-0.052721310406923294,
0.07646553218364716,
0.011713054962456226,
-0.0077483681961894035,
0.03038748726248741,
-0.08266270160675049,
0.0719401016831398,
-0.07675028592348099,
-0.03610766679048538,
-0.028030456975102425,
-0.07127046585083008,
0.023805515840649605,
-0.009767931886017323,
-0.0008399516227655113,
0.03827347233891487,
0.002347197849303484,
-0.052381593734025955,
-0.046895455569028854,
0.011291244998574257,
0.019005171954631805,
-0.014804625883698463,
-0.016163647174835205,
0.11744571477174759,
0.027445795014500618,
0.043576136231422424,
0.038454264402389526,
-0.04696393385529518,
0.07921715825796127,
0.08251480013132095,
-0.03256693482398987,
0.031231475993990898,
0.02478240802884102,
-0.004540282301604748,
-0.024640291929244995,
-0.03501761704683304,
0.12038780748844147,
-0.003968027886003256,
0.13666702806949615,
-0.03614731878042221,
0.007533324882388115,
-0.0050616455264389515,
0.07500702142715454,
0.0038366117514669895,
-0.016390129923820496,
-0.054115619510412216,
-0.06498759984970093,
0.07032559812068939,
-0.012290652841329575,
-3.855059437460616e-33,
-0.06367351114749908,
0.04797740653157234,
0.00014239823212847114,
0.08445153385400772,
-0.029075494036078453,
-0.052304767072200775,
-0.020305687561631203,
0.005212004296481609,
0.13779526948928833,
0.0043554967269301414,
-0.056631870567798615,
-0.017099304124712944,
0.009159250184893608,
0.01914602890610695,
0.07659139484167099,
0.06220189854502678,
-0.00009067046630661935,
0.02424466237425804,
0.029556293040513992,
-0.037764620035886765,
-0.07837394624948502,
0.029118826612830162,
-0.03272344544529915,
0.040791723877191544,
-0.018222419545054436,
0.04601448401808739,
-0.027362238615751266,
-0.03750292584300041,
-0.02390165999531746,
-0.06982817500829697,
-0.04597487673163414,
-0.02132573537528515,
0.031137367710471153,
0.11132553219795227,
-0.05831894278526306,
0.023449081927537918,
0.0008633903926238418,
0.10498964041471481,
0.007812065072357655,
-0.012146663852036,
0.008908183313906193,
-0.006587586365640163,
0.046578940004110336,
0.06392383575439453,
0.042673833668231964,
-0.03352376073598862,
-0.03406595438718796,
-0.09715158492326736,
-0.021868159994482994,
0.015865501016378403,
-0.05335453152656555,
0.053826864808797836,
-0.09645828604698181,
-0.011777563951909542,
-0.026957644149661064,
0.06364522129297256,
0.05011046677827835,
0.0591026172041893,
-0.02530176378786564,
-0.05175689235329628,
0.07268678396940231,
0.038576286286115646,
-0.08664610236883163,
0.054866187274456024,
0.07201017439365387,
-0.037161413580179214,
0.09278438240289688,
-0.1389382779598236,
-0.04403029754757881,
0.032259501516819,
0.012924612499773502,
0.03627505898475647,
-0.03363650292158127,
-0.04533838480710983,
0.0025972756557166576,
0.011803505010902882,
0.03238881006836891,
0.1059126928448677,
-0.01164436899125576,
0.09353266656398773,
-0.01276662852615118,
-0.002210708800703287,
-0.05794340744614601,
0.0589202456176281,
-0.09589820355176926,
-0.03273995220661163,
0.016377555206418037,
0.0325176976621151,
-0.04658694192767143,
0.037142835557460785,
-0.04691421240568161,
0.07593613117933273,
-0.04216413572430611,
-0.09876257181167603,
-0.020440511405467987,
-5.83641188711681e-8,
0.04076312482357025,
0.009710126556456089,
-0.07721037417650223,
0.02578897960484028,
0.08684347569942474,
0.0225074365735054,
0.056764885783195496,
0.07225510478019714,
-0.036889784038066864,
0.018708856776356697,
0.04615394398570061,
-0.02821391634643078,
-0.058064647018909454,
-0.05026544630527496,
0.0053186877630651,
-0.020646244287490845,
-0.05535374581813812,
-0.0064618890173733234,
-0.014704001136124134,
-0.059590600430965424,
-0.03875230252742767,
0.11764560639858246,
-0.028099460527300835,
-0.013267169706523418,
-0.034895338118076324,
0.0099969282746315,
-0.025701718404889107,
0.05133097246289253,
-0.023331603035330772,
0.05844779312610626,
0.00746808061376214,
0.003731107572093606,
0.012005584314465523,
-0.12396381050348282,
0.018763449043035507,
0.014097959734499454,
0.00397989759221673,
-0.04985888674855232,
-0.017131060361862183,
-0.029719099402427673,
0.028482118621468544,
-0.07562578469514847,
-0.03641032800078392,
-0.02923494391143322,
0.09844469279050827,
-0.061167988926172256,
-0.06284166872501373,
-0.05015701428055763,
0.09529092907905579,
-0.08667102456092834,
-0.019883140921592712,
-0.061636000871658325,
-0.034395188093185425,
-0.05493251234292984,
0.042355976998806,
-0.11220790445804596,
-0.010699205100536346,
-0.06495163589715958,
0.00937582552433014,
-0.05413839593529701,
0.06131190061569214,
-0.030637294054031372,
-0.04298621416091919,
0.09051667153835297
] | {
"pdf_file": "R2IMEGYDIXZXCNVIRC3SN2DVVGBVH5ZD.pdf",
"text": " U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics FAX-ON-DEMAND\n Philadelphia Information Office , Suite 610 East – The Curtis Center CODE\n 170 South Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106-3305 9130\n http://stats.bls.gov/ro3/home.htm\n Information Staff (215)597-DATA (597-3282) / Fax (215)861-5720 / FAX-ON-DEMAND (215)597-4153\n CONSUMER PRICE INDEX FOR ALL URBAN CONSUMERS (CPI-U)\n U.S. City Average ALL ITEMS 1982-84=100\n JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC\n 1985 105.5 106.0 106.4 106.9 107.3 107.6 107.8 108.0 108.3 108.7 109.0 109.3 1986 109.6 109.3 108.8 108.6 108.9 109.5 109.5 109.7 110.2 110.3 110.4 110.5 1987 111.2 111.6 112.1 112.7 113.1 113.5 113.8 114.4 115.0 115.3 115.4 115.4 1988 115.7 116.0 116.5 117.1 117.5 118.0 118.5 119.0 119.8 120.2 120.3 120.5 1989 121.1 121.6 122.3 123.1 123.8 124.1 124.4 124.6 125.0 125.6 125.9 126.1 1990 127.4 128.0 128.7 128.9 129.2 129.9 130.4 131.6 132.7 133.5 133.8 133.8 1991 134.6 134.8 135.0 135.2 135.6 136.0 136.2 136.6 137.2 137.4 137.8 137.9 1992 138.1 138.6 139.3 139.5 139.7 140.2 140.5 140.9 141.3 141.8 142.0 141.9 1993 142.6 143.1 143.6 144.0 144.2 144.4 144.4 144.8 145.1 145.7 145.8 145.8 1994 146.2 146.7 147.2 147.4 147.5 148.0 148.4 149.0 149.4 149.5 149.7 149.7 1995 150.3 150.9 151.4 151.9 152.2 152.5 152.5 152.9 153.2 153.7 153.6 153.5 1996 154.4 154.9 155.7 156.3 156.6 156.7 157.0 157.3 157.8 158.3 158.6 158.6 1997 159.1 159.6 160.0 160.2 160.1 160.3 160.5 160.8 161.2 161.6 161.5 161.3 1998 161.6 161.9 162.2 162.5 162.8 163.0 163.2 163.4 163.6 164.0 164.0 163.9 1999 164.3 164.5 165.0 166.2 166.2 166.2 166.7 167.1 167.9 168.2 168.3 168.3 2000 R/168.8 R/169.8 R/171.2 R/171.3 R/171.5 R/172.4 R/172.8 R/172.8 173.7 174.0 174.1 174.0 2001 175.1 175.8 176.2 176.9 177.7 178.0 177.5 177.5 178.3 177.7\nPERCENT CHANGE FROM 12 MONTHS AGO\n JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1985 3.5 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.8 3.6 3.3 3.1 3.2 3.5 3.8 1986 3.9 3.1 2.3 1.6 1.5 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.8 1.5 1.3 1.1 1987 1.5 2.1 3.0 3.8 3.9 3.7 3.9 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.5 4.4 1988 4.0 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 4.0 4.1 4.0 4.2 4.2 4.2 4.4 1989 4.7 4.8 5.0 5.1 5.4 5.2 5.0 4.7 4.3 4.5 4.7 4.6 1990 5.2 5.3 5.2 4.7 4.4 4.7 4.8 5.6 6.2 6.3 6.3 6.1 1991 5.7 5.3 4.9 4.9 5.0 4.7 4.4 3.8 3.4 2.9 3.0 3.1 1992 2.6 2.8 3.2 3.2 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.1 3.0 3.2 3.0 2.9 1993 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.8 2.7 2.7 1994 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.5 2.8 2.9 3.0 2.6 2.7 2.7 1995 2.8 2.9 2.9 3.1 3.2 3.0 2.8 2.6 2.5 2.8 2.6 2.5 1996 2.7 2.7 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.8 3.0 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.3 3.3 1997 3.0 3.0 2.8 2.5 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 1.8 1.7 1998 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.6 1999 1.7 1.6 1.7 2.3 2.1 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.7 2000 2.7 3.2 R/3.8 R/3.1 R/3.2 3.7 R/3.7 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.4 2001 3.7 3.5 2.9 3.3 3.6 3.2 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.1\nR/ revised\nNote to users: Users should be aware that CPI data were revised to correct an error in the residential rent and owner’s equivalent rent comp onents.\nIndexes were revised for both the CPI-U and CPI-W for the period January 2000 through August 2000. You may speak to an informa tion specialist at (215)\n597-3282 for more information. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics FAX-ON-DEMAND\n Philadelphia Information Office , Suite 610 East – The Curtis Center CODE\n 170 South Independence Mall West, Philadelphia, PA 19106-3305 9130\n http://stats.bls.gov/ro3/home.htm\n Information Staff (215)597-DATA (597-3282) / Fax (215)861-5720 / FAX-ON-DEMAND (215)597-4153.\n CONSUMER PRICE INDEX FOR URBAN WAGE EARNERS (CPI-W)\n U.S. City Average ALL ITEMS 1982-84=100\n JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC\n 1985 104.9 105.4 105.9 106.3 106.7 107.0 107.1 107.3 107.6 107.9 108.3 108.6 1986 108.9 108.5 107.9 107.6 107.9 108.4 108.4 108.6 109.1 109.1 109.2 109.3 1987 110.0 110.5 111.0 111.6 111.9 112.4 112.7 113.3 113.8 114.1 114.3 114.2 1988 114.5 114.7 115.1 115.7 116.2 116.7 117.2 117.7 118.5 118.9 119.0 119.2 1989 119.7 120.2 120.8 121.8 122.5 122.8 123.2 123.2 123.6 124.2 124.4 124.6 1990 125.9 126.4 127.1 127.3 127.5 128.3 128.7 129.9 131.1 131.9 132.2 132.2 1991 132.8 132.8 133.0 133.3 133.8 134.1 134.3 134.6 135.2 135.4 135.8 135.9 1992 136.0 136.4 137.0 137.3 137.6 138.1 138.4 138.8 139.1 139.6 139.8 139.8 1993 140.3 140.7 141.1 141.6 141.9 142.0 142.1 142.4 142.6 143.3 143.4 143.3 1994 143.6 144.0 144.4 144.7 144.9 145.4 145.8 146.5 146.9 147.0 147.3 147.2 1995 147.8 148.3 148.7 149.3 149.6 149.9 149.9 150.2 150.6 151.0 150.9 150.9 1996 151.7 152.2 152.9 153.6 154.0 154.1 154.3 154.5 155.1 155.5 155.9 155.9 1997 156.3 156.8 157.0 157.2 157.2 157.4 157.5 157.8 158.3 158.5 158.5 158.2 1998 158.4 158.5 158.7 159.1 159.5 159.7 159.8 160.0 160.2 160.6 160.7 160.7 1999 161.0 161.1 161.4 162.7 162.8 162.8 163.3 163.8 164.7 165.0 165.1 165.1 2000 R/165.6 R/166.5 R/167.9 R/168.0 R/168.2 R/169.2 R/169.4 R/169.3 170.4 170.6 170.9 170.7 2001 171.7 172.4 172.6 173.5 174.4 174.6 173.8 173.8 174.8 174.0\n PERCENT CHANGE FROM 12 MONTHS AGO\n JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC 1985 3.2 3.5 4.0 4.1 4.1 4.1 3.8 3.0 2.7 3.0 3.4 3.6 1986 3.8 2.9 1.9 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.4 1.1 0.8 0.6 1987 1.0 1.8 2.9 3.7 3.7 3.7 4.0 4.3 4.3 4.6 4.7 4.5 1988 4.1 3.8 3.7 3.7 3.8 3.8 4.0 3.9 4.1 4.2 4.1 4.4 1989 4.5 4.8 5.0 5.3 5.4 5.2 5.1 4.7 4.3 4.5 4.5 4.5 1990 5.2 5.2 5.2 4.5 4.1 4.5 4.5 5.4 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.1 1991 5.5 5.1 4.6 4.7 4.9 4.5 4.4 3.6 3.1 2.7 2.7 2.8 1992 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.0 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.1 2.9 3.1 2.9 2.9 1993 3.2 3.2 3.0 3.1 3.1 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.7 2.6 2.5 1994 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 3.0 2.6 2.7 2.7 1995 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.2 3.2 3.1 2.8 2.5 2.5 2.7 2.4 2.5 1996 2.6 2.6 2.8 2.9 2.9 2.8 2.9 2.9 3.0 3.0 3.3 3.3 1997 3.0 3.0 2.7 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 2.1 1.9 1.7 1.5 1998 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.6 1999 1.6 1.6 1.7 2.3 2.1 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 2000 R/2.9 R/3.4 4.0 R/3.3 3.3 3.9 3.7 R/3.4 3.5 3.4 3.5 3.4 2001 3.7 3.5 2.8 3.3 3.7 3.2 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.0\nR/ revised\nNote to users: Users should be aware that CPI data were revised to correct an error in the residential rent and owner’s equivalent rent comp onents.\nIndexes were revised for both the CPI-U and CPI-W for the period January 2000 through August 2000. You may speak to an informa tion specialist at (215)\n597-3282 for more information."
} |
[
-0.044215280562639236,
-0.019387289881706238,
0.09286043047904968,
-0.04401249811053276,
-0.003474570345133543,
0.01881500519812107,
-0.06766843795776367,
0.014604408293962479,
-0.02021169289946556,
0.09826591610908508,
0.06790580600500107,
0.0432455912232399,
0.02944732829928398,
-0.0015369830653071404,
-0.020621169358491898,
0.04683242365717888,
0.039137255400419235,
0.062174003571271896,
-0.102667436003685,
-0.05214298889040947,
0.017388107255101204,
0.030020875856280327,
-0.0011397278867661953,
0.07951223105192184,
-0.06396950036287308,
0.09494740515947342,
0.04862673208117485,
-0.04888942465186119,
-0.02424491196870804,
-0.037068381905555725,
0.009599167853593826,
-0.08971922844648361,
0.025969427078962326,
0.014554165303707123,
0.04047660157084465,
0.08232680708169937,
0.06094825640320778,
0.0851605236530304,
-0.05084892362356186,
-0.0633358433842659,
-0.04864920303225517,
-0.05903858318924904,
-0.027078265324234962,
0.025840507820248604,
-0.06431637704372406,
-0.022353852167725563,
-0.06005052104592323,
-0.14957106113433838,
-0.06003012880682945,
-0.06663647294044495,
-0.00317780370824039,
-0.05093792825937271,
0.03397807478904724,
-0.06298837065696716,
-0.04436866566538811,
0.07051901519298553,
-0.04411321133375168,
0.0012367736781015992,
0.056144412606954575,
-0.049811504781246185,
-0.0816604346036911,
0.025469545274972916,
-0.0757434144616127,
0.008001929149031639,
-0.04229969158768654,
0.029478061944246292,
0.01289674174040556,
-0.044647809118032455,
0.02604161575436592,
0.03496000915765762,
0.0470767579972744,
-0.03157075121998787,
0.0390474870800972,
0.014662157744169235,
0.03362124040722847,
0.08385936170816422,
0.05226827412843704,
0.08333611488342285,
0.09013564884662628,
-0.07843346893787384,
0.013329950161278248,
-0.01935207098722458,
-0.003653271123766899,
-0.03199664503335953,
0.0035782181657850742,
-0.07504981756210327,
-0.03185822442173958,
0.013735618442296982,
0.024125944823026657,
-0.05350898206233978,
0.0512729287147522,
0.00943884626030922,
-0.012286405079066753,
-0.011903941631317139,
0.09854887425899506,
0.08407389372587204,
-0.08130328357219696,
-0.07057607918977737,
0.044413160532712936,
0.05353504419326782,
-0.02652876451611519,
0.06874702870845795,
-0.032177045941352844,
-0.03699907660484314,
-0.037463098764419556,
-0.11594808101654053,
0.04642787575721741,
0.010306722484529018,
-0.05663134157657623,
-0.027922483161091805,
0.060678187757730484,
-0.10842711478471756,
0.009183689951896667,
0.03461328521370888,
0.14012743532657623,
-0.024693695828318596,
0.05358045548200607,
0.05997733771800995,
0.02262203022837639,
-0.04139043018221855,
0.05118625983595848,
0.01815936341881752,
0.06487491726875305,
-0.045683618634939194,
0.026159243658185005,
-0.017928246408700943,
0.008409268222749233,
6.781516541338027e-33,
0.043634843081235886,
0.07330180704593658,
-0.010925152339041233,
0.03575257584452629,
-0.019733168184757233,
-0.06826160103082657,
0.05754822492599487,
-0.03687114641070366,
-0.00008376098412554711,
-0.04420071467757225,
0.04255059361457825,
-0.012232005596160889,
0.011482483707368374,
-0.05205794423818588,
-0.013793092221021652,
0.02178671583533287,
-0.01835227943956852,
-0.01983259990811348,
-0.06540282815694809,
0.020435357466340065,
0.03388147056102753,
-0.08582629263401031,
0.04825644567608833,
-0.06654372066259384,
-0.007519314996898174,
-0.04345563054084778,
-0.021017299965023994,
-0.0002435066271573305,
0.006260703783482313,
0.014626502990722656,
0.051127877086400986,
-0.02495606429874897,
-0.09643181413412094,
0.020878605544567108,
-0.050317149609327316,
-0.042714379727840424,
0.035751357674598694,
-0.01735609397292137,
0.042663589119911194,
-0.09604644775390625,
-0.012675036676228046,
-0.0016982846427708864,
0.040677521377801895,
0.04309634119272232,
0.04741119220852852,
0.0445898063480854,
0.03815135359764099,
0.0025811195373535156,
0.01750343106687069,
0.02139199525117874,
0.033484432846307755,
-0.00483228825032711,
0.024266976863145828,
-0.10577361285686493,
-0.0013452767161652446,
0.013576784171164036,
0.045634675770998,
0.011586957611143589,
0.026320500299334526,
-0.05443025752902031,
0.07373230904340744,
0.07229389995336533,
-0.06363821774721146,
0.0022536502219736576,
0.02282833680510521,
-0.08415534347295761,
-0.10628603398799896,
-0.02245388925075531,
0.08493244647979736,
-0.08534707129001617,
0.024332266300916672,
0.008388713002204895,
-0.01628328114748001,
0.02500663511455059,
0.030900107696652412,
0.005471077747642994,
-0.006494386587291956,
-0.04203981161117554,
0.0007151952595449984,
-0.01476213987916708,
0.011679827235639095,
-0.058337464928627014,
-0.02298162505030632,
-0.01101265661418438,
0.03697647899389267,
-0.08376029878854752,
-0.014705989509820938,
-0.013861584477126598,
0.06102576479315758,
0.042814020067453384,
0.04078274220228195,
-0.019056076183915138,
-0.0345313735306263,
0.14153413474559784,
-0.018875736743211746,
-6.677448557091791e-33,
0.07698508352041245,
0.07131586968898773,
0.029510322958230972,
0.037058137357234955,
0.07369417697191238,
0.0014110194751992822,
0.0208844356238842,
-0.07426159083843231,
0.1351533830165863,
-0.08944717794656754,
-0.005909152794629335,
-0.02872047759592533,
-0.03093285672366619,
-0.018975278362631798,
-0.0007589046726934612,
0.004164965823292732,
0.030197177082300186,
-0.03184825927019119,
-0.014339335262775421,
-0.08126801252365112,
0.02419484779238701,
0.11161565035581589,
-0.10258404165506363,
0.00762416236102581,
0.024837926030158997,
-0.03727603331208229,
-0.02096131257712841,
0.04871536046266556,
-0.015434008091688156,
0.0877319797873497,
0.10223963111639023,
-0.08029501885175705,
0.08229593187570572,
0.0015184496296569705,
-0.06918489933013916,
-0.06112263724207878,
0.04884742945432663,
-0.023672597482800484,
-0.07600516825914383,
0.02080957405269146,
0.08608172833919525,
-0.008293700404465199,
0.03281198814511299,
-0.014510291628539562,
0.017884081229567528,
0.05211535096168518,
0.046178240329027176,
0.006338587962090969,
-0.04892221465706825,
0.048130638897418976,
-0.05900169536471367,
0.029670702293515205,
-0.0317072868347168,
0.042271938174963,
0.08209124952554703,
0.1138390600681305,
0.10565938800573349,
-0.02540808729827404,
-0.1072366014122963,
0.0066628288477659225,
0.013948644511401653,
-0.029710965231060982,
0.02906859666109085,
-0.045868001878261566,
0.12948742508888245,
-0.01723179593682289,
-0.03484540060162544,
-0.02207970805466175,
0.004415561910718679,
0.004355724435299635,
-0.022023385390639305,
-0.07533396780490875,
-0.018863309174776077,
-0.11520736664533615,
0.08875522762537003,
0.023823898285627365,
0.02053884230554104,
-0.03539120405912399,
-0.03753247112035751,
0.008006696589291096,
-0.016828341409564018,
-0.05327150225639343,
-0.01962479203939438,
-0.048385847359895706,
-0.04095735028386116,
0.058597758412361145,
0.09272134304046631,
-0.02978261187672615,
0.040890973061323166,
-0.04770232364535332,
0.009015131741762161,
-0.035571735352277756,
0.000766347162425518,
0.011942913755774498,
0.007803584448993206,
-5.5816759214621925e-8,
0.021375419571995735,
-0.02370963618159294,
-0.039675675332546234,
0.03910897299647331,
0.09677870571613312,
-0.007729739882051945,
0.024465039372444153,
0.016924194991588593,
0.051365502178668976,
0.12164104729890823,
0.01399125438183546,
-0.0066339680925011635,
-0.009511913172900677,
-0.0620468445122242,
0.04643937572836876,
0.005526496563106775,
-0.017217228189110756,
0.015365464612841606,
-0.05978803336620331,
-0.13593418896198273,
0.009989802725613117,
-0.06193312257528305,
-0.050428178161382675,
-0.023843837901949883,
-0.03207988664507866,
-0.05507536977529526,
0.0011718287132680416,
0.04389847815036774,
-0.024633413180708885,
-0.035193052142858505,
-0.015736084431409836,
0.0036993110552430153,
0.031354207545518875,
-0.0244431309401989,
-0.018887657672166824,
-0.027222847566008568,
-0.04021184891462326,
0.046351250261068344,
0.06651819497346878,
0.045909393578767776,
-0.010856968350708485,
-0.015041307546198368,
0.030922923237085342,
0.03326043114066124,
-0.03252528980374336,
0.04907459393143654,
-0.03940840810537338,
0.0049055395647883415,
0.003919592592865229,
-0.02249853126704693,
-0.05095979943871498,
-0.053996969014406204,
0.0261470228433609,
-0.04792632907629013,
0.04781516641378403,
0.020140569657087326,
0.04966939985752106,
-0.049776237457990646,
0.003111078403890133,
-0.03313399478793144,
0.08280935138463974,
0.07024320214986801,
-0.05951988697052002,
0.034186337143182755
] | {
"pdf_file": "WTLBOK7EAQPHVUW75UU2AI47NS3XJ7QH.pdf",
"text": "Jefferson County\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Stuart Middle School\nSchool Review Report\nPage 1 of 74 Stuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictSchool Review Executive Summary\nThe Kentucky Department of Education conducted a scholastic review of Stuart Middle \nSchool during the period of 10/ 26/2008 - 10/31/2008. Here ar e the most relevant facts \nand next step recommendations from the review. We have provided space for \nidentifying the actions steps you will take, the timelines you will establish for those \nsteps, and the person(s) for overseeing the action steps. We encourage you to ask \nyour best people to prioritize bold, specific actions on aggr essive timelines to improve \nstudent achievement as soon as practicable.DeLana Alexander, Principal\nIntroduction\nSchool Deficiencies and Next Steps\nSchool leadership has not provid ed an orderly, equitable, and \nsafe learning environment for all students.1. Deficiency\nSchool leadership should establ ish a procedure for monitoring \nclassroom management to ensure that all teachers are \nimplementing the adopted Conversation Help Activity Movement Participation program. Inconsistencies in teacher \nexpectations of student behav ior should be addressed. \nSchool leadership should hol d all staff accountable for \ndemonstrating high behavior and academic expectations for \nall students.Next Steps\nSchool Action \nSteps to \nOvercoming \nObstacles\nTimeline/Person \nResponsible\nTeachers are not using effectiv e instructional strategies to \ndeliver the aligned curriculum.2. Deficiency\nSchool leadership shou ld monitor the delivery of instruction to \nensure teachers use varied st udent-centered instructional \nstrategies that require higher-order thinking and problem-solving skills. These strategies should result in daily lessons \nthat are relevant, motivating and focused on meeting the \nneeds of a diverse student po pulation. School leadership \nshould ensure that instruction is rigorous, challenging and \ndelivers the aligned curriculum with the goal of all students \nreaching proficiency.Next Steps\nSchool Action \nSteps to \nOvercoming \nObstacles\nPage 2 of 74 Timeline/Person \nResponsible\nSchool Council has not adop ted all required policies \nmandated by Kentucky Revised Statutes.3. Deficiency\nSchool council should continue t he initiative to review, revise, \ndevelop, adopt and implement all required policies and by-\nlaws that govern the decision-m aking efforts of the council. \nThese policies and by-laws shou ld be titled, sequentially \nnumbered and dated up on adoption, review or revision. All \npolicies and by-laws should be used by the council to drive \ninstructional and operational decisions that will chart the \ndirection of the school.Next Steps\nSchool Action \nSteps to \nOvercoming \nObstacles\nTimeline/Person \nResponsible\nSchool leadership has not ensured a clear connection \nbetween teacher evaluations, prof essional growth plans, and \nprofessional development.4. Deficiency\nSchool leadership should establ ish a procedure for monitoring \nthe connectivity of teacher evaluations, professional growth plans, and professional development to facilitate continuous improvement that targets the needs of students as identified \nin and implemented through the comprehensive school \nimprovement plan.Next Steps\nSchool Action \nSteps to \nOvercoming \nObstacles\nTimeline/Person \nResponsible\nSchool leadership did not collaborate with stakeholders to \ndevelop a vision and belief stat ements that drive the focus of \nthe school.5. Deficiency\nSchool leadership should collaborate with representatives of \nall stakeholder groups to revi ew and revise the mission \nstatement to specifically addr ess the school’s purpose. The \nmission statement should be accompanied by a carefully \ncrafted vision and thoughtful be lief statements that move the \nschool toward proficiency, and is effectively communicated to \nthe school community.Next Steps\nSchool Action \nSteps to \nOvercoming \nObstacles\nTimeline/Person \nResponsible\nSchool leadership has not im plemented the comprehensive \nschool improvement plan.6. Deficiency\nPage 3 of 74 School leadership should immediately, fully implement the \ncomprehensive school improvement plan and monitor its impact on instructional practice s and student performance. \nData collected from the monito ring process should be used to \nreview and modify the comp rehensive school improvement \nplan in a timely manner.Next Steps\nSchool Action \nSteps to \nOvercoming \nObstacles\nTimeline/Person \nResponsible\nPage 4 of 74 Stuart Middle School\n29%\n57%14%\n13%\n87%\n75%25%73%27%\n60%40%\n17%\n75%8%91%9%\n20%\n40%40%\n100%KDE 2008 Scholastic Review Re port\nAt-a-Glance\n4- Exemplary level of development and implementation\n3- Fully functional and operational level of development and implementation\n2- Limited development or partial implementation\n1- Little or no development and implementationThe charts below indicate the percentage of indicators in each standard for the following\nfour performance levels:\nStandard 1 - Curriculum\nStandard 2 - Classroom \nEvaluation/Assessment\nStandard 3 - InstructionStandard 4 - School Culture\nStandard 5 - Student, Family and Community \nSupport\nStandard 6 - Professional Growth, \nDevelopment, and EvaluationStandard 7 - Leadership\nStandard 8 - School Organization and Fiscal \nResources\nStandard 9 - Comprehensive and Effective \nPlanningTotal Indicators: 7\nTotal Indicators: 8\nTotal Indicators: 8 Total Indicators: 12 Total Indicators: 16Total Indicators: 10 Total Indicators: 5Total Indicators: 11 Total Indicators: 11\n4\n32\n14\n32\n14\n32\n1\n4\n32143214321\n4\n3\n214\n3\n214\n3\n21\nPage 5 of 74 9 STANDARDS AND 88 INDICATORS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT - Jefferson County - Stuart Middle School\nGreen 4- Exemplary level of development \nand implementation\nBlue 3- Fully functional and operational level of development and implementation\nBlack 2- Limited development or partial implementation\nRed 1- Little or no development and implementationLegendStandard - 1 - Academic Performance\nCurriculum\n1.1a Curriculum is aligned. Academic Expectations, \nCore Content for Assessment, Transformations\n1.1b District initiates, facilitates discussions among \nschools regarding curriculum standards\n1.1c District initiates, facilitates discussions to \neliminate unnecessary overlaps\n1.1d Evidence of vertical communication, intentional \nfocus on key curriculum transition points\n1.1e School curriculum provides specific links to \ncontinuing education\n1.1f Systematic process for monitoring, evaluating \nand reviewing curriculum\n1.1g Curriculum provides access to a common \nacademic core\nStandard - 2 - Academic Performance\nClassroom Evaluation/Assessment\n2.1a Classroom assessments frequent, rigorous, \naligned with Kentucky's core content\n2.1b Teachers collaborate in the design of authentic \nassessment\n2.1c Students can articulate what is required to be \nproficient\n2.1d Test scores are used to identify curriculum gaps\n2.1e Assessments designed to provide feedback on \nstudent learning for instructional purposes\n2.1f Performance standards communicated, evident \nin classrooms, observable in student work\n2.1g Assessment and Accountability Program is \ncoordinated by school and district leadership\n2.1h Samples of student work are analyzed\nStandard - 3 - Academic Performance\nInstruction\n3.1a Evidence that effective and varied instructional \nstrategies are used in all classrooms\n3.1b Instructional strategies and learning activities \nare aligned\n3.1c Instructional strategies/a ctivities are consistently \nmonitored...diverse student population\n3.1d Teachers demonstrate content knowledge\n3.1e Evidence teachers incorporate the use of \ntechnology\n3.1f Instructional resources are sufficient to deliver \nthe curriculum\n3.1g Teachers examine and discuss student work\n3.1h Homework is frequent and monitored, tied to \ninstructional practiceStandard - 4 - Learning Environment\nSchool Culture\n4.1a Leadership support for a safe, orderly and \nequitable learning environment\n4.1b Leadership creates experiences that all \nchildren can learn\n4.1c Teachers hold high expectations for all \nstudents\n4.1d Teachers, staff involved in decision-making \nprocesses regarding teaching and learning\n4.1e Teachers accept their role in student success\n4.1f School assigns staff...o pportunities for ALL \nstudents\n4.1g Teachers communicate regularly with families\n4.1h Evidence that the teachers and staff care\n4.1i Multiple communicati on strategies...to all \nstakeholders\n4.1j Evidence that student achievement is highly \nvalued\n4.1k The school/district provides support...needs \nof all students\nStandard - 5 - Learning Environment\nStudent, Famil y and Communit y Support\n5.1a Families and the community are active \npartners\n5.1b All students have access to all the curriculum\n5.1c Reduce barriers to learning\n5.1d Students are provided opportunities to \nreceive additional assistance\n5.1e School maintains an accurate student record \nsystem\nStandard - 6 - Learning Environment - \nProfessional Growth, Development, and \nEvaluation\nProfessional Develo pment\n6.1a Support for the long-term professional \ngrowth of the individual staff members\n6.1b The school has an intentional plan for \nbuilding instructional capacity\n6.1c Staff development priorities..alignment..goals \nfor student performance\n6.1d Plans for school improvement directly \nconnect goals for student learning\n6.1e Professional development is on-going and \njob-embedded\n6.1f Professional development planning connect \nstudent achievement data\nProfessional Growth and Evaluation\n6.2a Clearly defined evaluation process\n6.2b Leadership provides the fiscal resources for \nthe appropriate professional growth\n6.2c Employee evaluation and the individual \nprofessional growth plan to improve staff \nproficiency\n6.2d A process of personnel evaluation which \nmeets or exceeds standards set in statute\n6.2e The school/district improvement plan \nidentifies specific instructional leadership \nneeds\n6.2f Evaluation process to provide \nteachers..change behavior and instructional \npracticeStandard - 7 - Efficiency\nLeadership\n7.1a Leadership has developed and sustained a shared \nvision\n7.1b Leadership decisions focused on student academic \ndata\n7.1c All administrators have a growth plan\n7.1d Evidence that the lead ership team disaggregates \ndata\n7.1e Leadership ensures all instructional staff...access to \ncurriculum related materials\n7.1f Leadership ensures that time is \nprotected...instructional issues\n7.1g Leadership plans and allocates resources\n7.1h School/district leadership provides policy and \nresource infrastructure\n7.1i Process for the development and the \nimplementation of council policy\n7.1j SBDM council has an intentional focus on student \nacademic performance\n7.1k Principal demonstrates leadership skills in academic \nperformance, learning environment, efficiency\nStandard - 8 - Efficiency - School Organization and \nFiscal Resources\nOrganization of the School\n8.1a School is organized...use of all available resources\n8.1b All students have access to all the curriculum\n8.1c Staff are allocated based upon the learning needs of \nall students\n8.1d Staff makes efficient use of instructional time\n8.1e Staff...planning vertically and horizontally across \ncontent areas\n8.1f Schedule aligned with the school's mission\nResource Allocation and Inte gration\n8.2a Clearly defined process (in accordance with the \nschool council allocation formula)\n8.2b Budget reflects decisions directed by an \nassessment of need\n8.2c Councils, school boards analyze funding and other \nresource requests\n8.2d Resources are allocated and integrated to address \nstudent needs\nStandard - 9 - Efficiency - Comprehensive and Effective \nPlanning\nDefinin g the School Vision, Mission, Beliefs\n9.1a Collaborative process used to develop the vision, \nbeliefs, mission\nDevelo pment of the Profile\n9.2a Planning process involves collecting, managing and \nanalyzing data\n9.2b Use data for school improvement planning\nDefinin g Desired Results for Student Learnin g\n9.3a School and district plans reflect learning research, \nexpectations for student learning\n9.3b Analyze their students' unique learning needs\n9.3c Results for student learning are defined\nAnalyzing Instructional and Or ganizational Effectiveness\n9.4a Strengths and limitations are identified\n9.4b Goals for building, strengthening capacity\nDevelo pment of the Im provement Plan\n9.5a Steps for school improvement aligned with \nimprovement goals\n9.5b Plan identifies resources, timelines\n9.5c Evaluating the effectiveness of improvement plan\n9.5d Improvement plan is aligned with the school's \nprofile, beliefs, mission, desired results\nImplementation and Documentation\n9.6a Plan is implemented as developed\n9.6b School evaluates the degree to which it achieves \nthe goals and objectives for student learning\n9.6c The school evaluates the degree to which it \nachieves the expected impact\n9.6d Evidence of attempts to sustain the commitment to \ncontinuous improvement\nPage 6 of 74 Kentucky Departme nt of EducationLevel 1 and Level 2 School Responsibility\nPursuant to Kentucky Administrative Regulation, 703 KAR 5:120, Level 1 \nand Level 2 schools must adhere to the following: \n (excerpt from 703 KAR 5:120) \n Section 1 (partial) (3) To involve stakeholders in identifying priorities for school improvemen\nt \nplanning, the school principal, in collaboration with the other school councilmembers, shall notify parents and interested community members of the findingsand recommendations of the review team. The findings shall be presented and \ndiscussed on the agenda of the next scheduled school council meeting and at a\nlocal board of education meeting. Section 8 (partial) (2) A principal of a school classified as a Level 1 or Level 2 shall participatein at least twelve (12) hours of professional development activities which ma\ny\ninclude opportunities for coaching and mentoring. The focus shall be on buildingleadership skills in student academic performance, learning environment, andorganizational efficiency as measured by the \"Standards and Indicators fo\nr\nSchool Improvement\". The participation shall occur within twelve (12) months o f \nbeing classified as a Level 1 or Level 2 school. The professional developmen t\nactivities shall be designed and delivered by the KDE or the local district in accordance with KRS 156.101. \n \n \n \nFocus on Student Academic Performance \nThe scholastic review report contains many important findings the school should \nconsider. It will be the task of school leadership to read and prioritize the results from this report to plan for improving student performance. To ensure that the \nimplications of this report and the recommendations are understood and \nimplemented, the following additional actions should be taken: \n• Disseminate the findings and recommendations of this report \nbroadly to constituents for discussion to aid in determining priorities for planning. Use the report for learning, reflection and action. \n• Build greater understanding of new approaches to professional \ndevelopment and address the ways that the school community will have to work differently to improve instruction. \n• Acknowledge and address the fact that not all current practice \nprovides adequate opportunity for the school staff to carry out the \nnew demands of their work, to analyze data and diagnose student needs, to determine the efficacy of their own practice, to align their instruction to new curriculum standards and to collaborate regularly with peers. \n \nPage 7 of 74 Introduction\n The Kentucky Department of Education conducted a scholastic review of Stuart Middle School during \nthe period of 10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008. This school's last combined accountability index was 64.8 and its \nclassification was Assistance Level 2.\n The scholastic review team activities included a review of the documents collected for the school \nportfolio and profile; classroom observations (59) and formal interviews and informal discussions with \nteachers (61), students (87), parents (24), Family Resource/Youth Services Center staff members (2), \ncentral office personnel (8), support staff members (6), assistant principal's (3), counselors (3) and the \nprincipal.\n The Standards and Indicators for School Improvement rubric was the primary assessment instrument \nused during the visit. The team also compiled results from perception surveys, leadership assessments \nand efficiency reviews. All of these results were considered in the development of this report.\n The scholastic review report was based upon examination of the documents provided in the school \nportfolio, team experiences and observations. The specific findings and recommendations are organized \nunder the headings of Academic Performance, Learning Environment and Efficiency. Each of the nine \nstandards for success in Kentucky schools is addressed in the following pages.\n The chairperson of the team was Wayne Pucke tt - District Administrator. The other team members \nwere Jesus Segundo Menendez - Parent, Cynthia Lawson - Highly Skilled Educator, Herbert D. Wheat - \nBuilding Administrator, Barbara Miller - Teacher, Nancy Gilligan - Teacher, Larry G. Frank - Building \nAdministrator, Margaret K. Dotson - Teacher, Ru th Gail Butler - Teacher, Dr. Lynn Smith - Higher \nEducation Representative, Bill R. Morgan - District Administrator.Stuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictScholastic Review Summary Report\nAcademic Performance\nThe following Academic Performance Standards address curriculum, classroom \nevaluation/assessment and instruction.\nStandard 1: The school develops and implements a curriculum that is rigorous, intentional, and aligned \nto state and local standards.\nStandard 2: The school utilizes multiple evaluation and assessment strategies to continuously monitor \nand modify instruction to meet student needs and support proficient student work.\nStandard 3: The school's instructional program actively engages all students by using effective, varied, \nand research-based practices to improve student performance.\nLearning Environment\nThe following Learning Environment Standards address school culture; student, family, and community \nsupport; and professional growth, development and evaluation.\nStandard 4: The school/district functions as an effective learning community and supports a climate \nconducive to performance excellence.\nStandard 5: The school/district works with families and community groups to remove barriers to learning \nin an effort to meet the intellectual, social, career, and development needs of students.\nStandard 6: The school/district provides research-based, results driven professional development \nopportunities for staff and implements performance evaluation procedures in order to \nimprove teaching and learning.\nPage 8 of 74 Efficiency\nThe following Efficiency Standards address leadership, school structure and resources, and \ncomprehensive and effective planning.\nStandard 7: School/district instructional decisions focus on support for teaching and learning, \norganizational direction, high performance expectations, creating a learning culture, and \ndeveloping leadership capacity.\nStandard 8: The organization of the school/district maximizes use of time, all available space and other \nresources to maximize teaching and learning and support high student and staff \nperformance.\nStandard 9: The school/district develops, implements and evaluates a comprehensive school \nimprovement plan that communicates a clear purpose, direction and action plan focused on \nteaching and learning.\nPage 9 of 74 Standard 1 CurriculumSummary Findings in: Academic PerformanceStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nFindings For This Standard Are Based On:\nReview of classroom assessments, cla ssroom assignments, comprehensive school \nimprovement plan, curriculum documents, curriculum maps, employee handbooks, \neWalk data, individual professional growth plans, Kentucky Performance Report \ndisaggregated data, Kentucky 's Core Content for Assessm ent, lesson plans/units of \nstudy, master school schedule, protocols fo r analyzing student work, rubrics, samples \nof classroom assessments, samples of st udent work products, sch ool council policies \nand bylaws and School Report Card data\nInterviews with central office staff, curr iculum resource specialist, parents, school \ncouncil members, school le adership, students and teachers\nObservations of classrooms, common areas and media center\n3 Performance Rating\n1.1a There is evidence that the curricu lum is aligned with the Academic \nExpectations, Core Content for Assessment, Transformations and the \nProgram of Studies.\nStuart Middle School's written curriculum mirrors the Jefferson County District \nCurriculum which is aligned with Kentucky Core Content for Assessment 4.1, \nProgram of Studies, Academic Expe ctations and national standards.\n1.1e The school curriculum provides specific links to continuing education, life and \ncareer options.\nStuart Middle School offers a program in health-related careers where \nstudents explore a wide variety of fields and participate in ha nds-on activities \nwith health professionals. The sixth grade guidance counselor works with the sixth grade students on developing th eir Individual Education Plan which \nincludes a career skills inventory. The seventh grade students have the \nopportunity to explore career options in the practical living class. Eighth grade \nstudents participate in Junior Achiev ement that addresses career related \nconsiderations like education, salary and personal finance. Teachers invite \nspeakers into their classroom and make career connections when organizing field trips.\nPage 10 of 74 Standard 1 CurriculumSummary Findings in: Academic PerformanceStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n2 Performance Rating\n1.1b The district initiates and facilitates discussions among schools regarding \ncurriculum standards to ensure they are clearly articulated across all levels (P-12).\nThe district has developed a curriculu m alignment docum ent and curriculum \ninstructional frameworks P-12 which have been shared with all schools. Monthly middle school principals’ meetings focus on curriculum and \ninstructional issues. Middle school prin cipals observe the implementation of \nthe curriculum instructional frameworks in each others’ buildings and discuss \ntheir observations. The district holds two or three meetings annually for literacy leads, math leads and conten t department chairper sons at the middle \nschool level. There have been limit ed opportunities fo r discussion and \nplanning for vertical alig nment among f eeder schools.\n1.1c The district initiates and facilitates di scussions between schoo ls in the district \nin order to eliminate unnecessa ry overlaps and close gaps.\nThe district occasionally initiates and facilitates discussions between schools \nto ensure that each grade level follows the district curriculum and the \ncurriculum instructional frameworks. District leadership initiates limited \ndiscussions between school st affs concerning vertical alignment to eliminate \ngaps and overlaps in the curriculum (ele mentary to middle and middle to high \nschool).\n1.1d There is evidence of vertical communication with an intentional focus on key \ncurriculum transition points within grade configurations (e.g., from primary to \nmiddle and middle to high).\nElementary feeder schools share student needs and academic information \nwith the sixth grade guidance counselor . Key academic tran sition points are \nnot systematically addressed. Sixth graders are invited to the Stuart Middle \nSchool Spartan Academy Summer Kid Camp to aid in transition from elementary to middle school. However, only twenty-five percent of incoming \nsixth graders attend th e camp. During the camp , the Scholastic Reading \nInventory is administered to students to determine placement in reading classes. Math teachers provide mini-l essons on the use of laptops, graphing \ncalculators and manipulatives and the students become comfortable with the \nphysical layout of the school.\n1.1g The curriculum provides access to a common academic co re for all students.\nPage 11 of 74 Standard 1 CurriculumSummary Findings in: Academic PerformanceStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n2 Performance Rating\nAll students have access to the common academic core; however, delivery of \nthe curriculum in some classrooms lac ks rigor and is not challenging. The \ndistrict curriculum documents address local, state and national standards. \nMost teachers are using the curriculu m instructional frameworks to prepare \nclassroom instruction.\nPage 12 of 74 Standard 1 CurriculumSummary Findings in: Academic PerformanceStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n1 Performance Rating\n1.1f There is in place a systematic process for monitoring, evaluating and \nreviewing the curriculum.\nThe school council does not have a curriculum policy, and there is no \nsystematic process to ensure that th e implementation of the district aligned \ncurriculum is occurring. Teachers analyze student core content assessments \nto measure student understanding of the core content. This data is entered \ninto the Classroom Assessment Syst em and Community Access Dashboard \nfor Education software program.\nPage 13 of 74 Stuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nSummary of recommendations in: Academic Performance\nCurriculum\nSchool leadership should de velop a procedure to system atically and consistently \nmonitor the implementation of the Jeffe rson County Public Schools' aligned \ncurriculum and set high student perf ormance standards for all students. \nSchool leadership should collaborate with the district to initiate a procedure for \nfacilitating discussions on vertical alignment between schools to ensure there are no gaps or overlaps in the P-12 curriculum and establish entry and exit criteria for in-\ncoming sixth graders and exiting eighth graders.Standard 1\nResources:\nCombined Curriculum Documents. (Available from the Kentucky Department of Education, \n500 Mero Street, Frankfort, KY 40601). \nhttp://www.education.ky.gov/KDE/Instructional+Resources/Curriculum+Documents+ \nand+Resources/Teaching+Tools/Combined+Curriculum+Documents/default.htm\nCore Content for Assessment 4.1. (Available from the Kentucky Department of Education, \n500 Mero Street, Frankfort, KY 40601). \nhttp://www.education.ky.gov/KDE/Instructional+Resources/Curriculum+Documents+and+Res\nources/Core+Content+for+Assessment/ Core+Content+for+Assessment+4.0/default.htm\nJacobs, H. H. (2004). Getting Results with Curriculum Mapping. Alexandria, VA: Association \nfor Supervision and Curriculum Development. \nO’Shea, Mark R. (2005). From Standards to Success. Alexandria: VA: Association for \nSupervision and Curriculum Development.\nStandards-Based Curriculum Development Manual. (Available from the Kentucky \nDepartment of Education, 500 Mero Street, Frankfort, KY 40601). \nPage 14 of 74 Standard 2 Classroom Evaluation/AssessmentSummary Findings in: Academic PerformanceStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nFindings For This Standard Are Based On:\nReview of bulletin boards, exhibits and displays, classroom assessments, classroom \nassignments, comprehensive school improvem ent plan, curriculum documents, eWalk \ndata, lesson plans/units of study, protoc ols for analyzing student work, rubrics, \nsamples of classroom assessments, samples of student work prod ucts, school council \nmeeting agenda and minutes, school council policies and bylaws, student work and \nteacher portfolios\nInterviews with counselor, cu rriculum resource specialist, district leadership, parents, \nschool leadership and teachers\nObservations of classrooms\n3 Performance Rating\n2.1g Implementation of the state-required Assessment and Accountability Program \nis coordinated by school and district leadership.\nThe state required assessment and acc ountability program is coordinated by \nthe building assessment coordinator who ensures policies and procedures are \nproperly implemented. Training is pr ovided for all teachers on appropriate \ntesting procedures. Student accommodations during testing adhere to state \nguidelines.\nPage 15 of 74 Standard 2 Classroom Evaluation/AssessmentSummary Findings in: Academic PerformanceStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n2 Performance Rating\n2.1a Classroom assessments of student learning are frequent, rigorous and \naligned with Kentu cky's core content.\nMost assessments are aligne d with Kentucky's Core Content for Assessment. \nThe school council has an assessment policy statin g that assessment should \nbe ongoing and reviewed on a continuous basis. District assessment checks \noccur four times througho ut the year. The school staff is involved in a \ncollaborative process to analyze th e results of open response and multiple-\nchoice assessments. Most informal or daily assessments are teacher-made \nworksheets and textbook or workbook assignments. Assessments are not \nalways rigorous and authentic. Rubrics and models of proficient work are not \nvisible in most classrooms.\n2.1b Teachers collaborate in the design of authentic assessment tasks aligned \nwith core content subject matter.\nAlthough a common planning time is provided, teachers rarely collaborate to \ndesign authentic assessments. Some assessment tasks are not designed for students to demons trate proficiency.\n2.1c Students can articulate the academic expectations in eac h class and know \nwhat is required to be proficient.\nMost students are unable to articula te the academic expectations for their \nclasses or the requirements for profic iency on an assigned task. Students are \nrarely required to evaluate their own work outside of checking seatwork or homework. Student reflection is not routinely integrated into instructional or \nassessment activities. Most teachers us e the district rubric for assessment.\n2.1d Test scores are used to identify curriculum gaps.\nDistrict leadership along with school leadership and staff analyze assessment \ndata to identify curriculum gaps. Multiple sources of data (Kentucky Core \nContent Tests, No Child Left Behi nd, and Classroom Assessment System \nand Community Access Dashboard for Education software program) are routinely collected; however, this data is not always used to inform curricular, instructional and assessment practi ces to support higher student \nachievement. Some teachers examine data outside of formal assessment \nresults and have adjusted assessments or instructional strate gies to meet the \nneeds of students identified through data analysis.\nPage 16 of 74 Standard 2 Classroom Evaluation/AssessmentSummary Findings in: Academic PerformanceStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n2 Performance Rating\n2.1e Multiple assessments are specific ally designed to provide meaningful \nfeedback on student learning for instructional purposes.\nStudents are rarely provided with choice s in the ways that they demonstrate \nlearning (e.g., learning styles and multiple intelligences). Occasionally teachers formally examine classr oom assessment tasks at team and \ndepartmental meetings, bu t the process is in the beginning stages and has \nfailed to transfer into instructional modi fications. Most teac hers provide limited \nfeedback on assessments.\n2.1f Performance standards are clearly co mmunicated, evident in classrooms and \nobservable in student work.\nPerformance standards are not consis tently communicated to students. \nRubrics are provided for open resp onse questions, but are not always \nprovided for other types of assessmen t tasks. Some teachers do not use \nperformance standards to develop rubr ics. Few models of rigorous student \nwork are displayed or referenced for instructional purposes.\n2.1h Samples of student work are analyzed to inform instruction, revise curriculum \nand pedagogy, and obtain info rmation on student progress.\nTeachers analyze data from Core Co ntent Assessments during department \nmeetings but seldom analyze student wo rk. Samples of student work are \nused mainly for grading purposes and ra rely drive an initiative for revising \ninstructional practices to meet the needs of students.\nPage 17 of 74 Stuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nSummary of recommendations in: Academic Performance\nClassroom Evaluation/Assessment\nSchool leadership should en sure that proficient stud ent work including scoring \nrubrics is showcased and referenc ed as a part of instruction. \nCommon planning time should be used as an opportunity for collaborating on \nstudent performance issues. Sc hool leadership should assi st teachers in examining \nuse of this resource.\nSchool leadership should m onitor and evaluate the impact professional development \nhas on instructional practices and student achievement. This data should be used to \nmodify instruction.Standard 2\nResources:\nAllen, D. & McDonald, J. (1992). The Tuning Protocol: A Process for Reflection on Teacher \nand Student Work. Coalition of Essential Schools. www.itag.education.tas.gov.au\nArter, J. A. (1996). Assessing Student Performance Professional Inquiry Kit. Alexandria, VA: \nAssociation for Supervision and Curriculum Development. http://ascd.org. \nhttp://shop.ascd.org/productdisplay.cfm?productid=196214\nAssessment Blueprint. (Available from the Kentucky Department of Education, 500 Mero \nStreet, Frankfort, KY 40601). \nhttp://www.education.ky.gov/KDE/Administrat ive+Resources/Testing+and+Reporting+ \n/CATS/Accountability+ \nSystem/Blueprint+for+Kentucky+Core+Content+Test.htm?IMAGE=Search\nJohnson, R. S. (2002). Using Data to Close the Achievement Gap: How to Measure Equity in \nOur Schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. ISBN 0-7619-4509-1\nMarzano, R. J. (2000). Transforming Classroom Grading. Alexandria, VA: Association for \nSupervision and Curriculum Development.\nPopham, W. J. (2001). The Truth about Testing: An Educator’s Call to Action. Alexandria,VA: \nAssociation for Supervision and Curriculum Development.\nPage 18 of 74 Standard 3 InstructionSummary Findings in: Academic PerformanceStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nFindings For This Standard Are Based On:\nReview of classroom assessments, cla ssroom assignments, committee meeting \nminutes and agenda, comprehensive sc hool improvement plan, curriculum \ndocuments, eWalk data, Kentucky Perfor mance Report disaggregated data, lesson \nplans/units of study, master school schedule, professional development records, roster \nof teaching assignments, rubrics, samp les of classroom assessments, samples of \nstudent work products, school council m eeting agenda and minute s, school council \npolicies and bylaws, School Report Card da ta, student work and teacher portfolios\nInterviews with central office staff, curricul um resource specialist, district leadership, \nparents, principal, school council member s, school leadership, students and teachers\nObservations of classrooms\n2 Performance Rating\n3.1b Instructional stra tegies and learning activities are aligned with the district, \nschool and state learning goals and assessment expectations for student \nlearning.\nInstructional strategies and learning activities are not always aligned to \nKentucky state standards. Learning acti vities are similar to those on state \nassessments, but few reflect higher orde r thinking skills essential for students \nto reach proficiency.\n3.1c Instructional stra tegies/activities are consistent ly monitored and aligned with \nthe changing needs of a diverse student population to ensure various learning \napproaches and learning styles are addressed.\nLearning walks are conducted by school leadership for the purpose of \nmonitoring instructional strategies; howe ver, the approach is not systematic \nand does not have the desir ed effect, which is to improve instruction. Few \ndifferentiation strategies are used and those that are, do not appropriately \naddress the needs of various learning st yles and achievement gaps within the \nstudent population. Electron ic walk through data indicates that 5% of teachers \nuse differentiated instruction.\n3.1d Teachers demonstrate the content knowledge necessary to challenge and \nmotivate students to high levels of learning.\nTeachers are reported to be highly qualified. However, most instruction is not \nsufficiently rigorous to bring about student proficiency. Electronic walk throughs conducted by the review team members indicated that only 4% of \nPage 19 of 74 Standard 3 InstructionSummary Findings in: Academic PerformanceStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n2 Performance Rating\nclassroom instruction includes higher-order thinking skills.\n3.1e There is evidence that teachers incorporate the us e of technology in their \nclassrooms.\nThe school council has adopted a technol ogy policy, but school leadership \nhas not developed the procedures for moni toring the impact of technology on \ninstructional practice and student achievement. Some teachers use \ntechnology to enhance instructional de livery. Electronic walkthrough data \nconducted by the review team members indicates that 35 percent of teachers \nused technology. Technology-based programs like Read 180 and Success \nMaker are used for remediation with some students. Technology is used infrequently by students to create pr oducts and extend their learning.\n3.1f Instructional resources (textbook, su pplemental reading, technology) are \nsufficient to effectively deliver the curriculum.\nInstructional resources, including phys ical as well as human resources, are \nplentiful. Yet, there is no overall plan within the departments or the school to \nindicate to teachers how these resource s should be used to maximize student \nlearning and support the curriculum. District resources such as resource \nteachers are infrequently used to th eir fullest potential due to a lack of \norganizational structure.\n3.1g Teachers examine and discuss student work collaboratively and use this \ninformation to inform their practice.\nTeachers work collaboratively during department meetings to analyze district \nCore Content Assessments. Collaborative analysis rarely occurs outside the \ndepartmental organizational stru cture or with teacher-generated \nassessments. Analysis informs some instructional practices to promote increased student achievement but is not uniform across the school.\nPage 20 of 74 Standard 3 InstructionSummary Findings in: Academic PerformanceStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n1 Performance Rating\n3.1a There is evidence that effective and va ried instructional st rategies are used in \nall classrooms.\nThe school council has a policy on in structional practices, but the policy \ninadequately addresses the need for differentiation, multiple intelligences, and \nlearning styles. There is limited use of varied instructional strategies and \nmost instruction is done as a whole group using lecture, textbooks, and \nworksheets.\n3.1h There is evidence that homework is frequent and monitored and tied to \ninstructional practice.\nHomework is infrequently assigned by teachers and rarely extends students’ \nlearning. Some teachers examine the work but do not use th at information to \nguide instructional practice.\nPage 21 of 74 Stuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nSummary of recommendations in: Academic Performance\nInstruction\nSchool leadership should collaborate with di strict resource teachers and identify the \nrole of the district resource teachers in improving instructional practices and student \nperformance. Expectations should be co mmunicated along with the strategies for \nimproving teacher and student performance. Strategies should be benchmarked, \nmonitored for implementation and evaluate d for impact. Immediate feedback should \nbe provided and re viewed, and needed modification made, to ensure continuous \nimprovement and student performance.Standard 3\nPage 22 of 74 Standard 4 School CultureSummary Findings in: Learning EnvironmentStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nFindings For This Standard Are Based On:\nReview of bulletin boards, exhibits an d displays, classroom displays, committee \nmeeting minutes and agenda, committee rost ers, comprehensive school improvement \nplan, curriculum documents, employee handb ooks, eWalk data, facility inspection \nreports, facility work orders, fire marshal reports, Kentucky Performance Report \ndisaggregated data, Kentucky 's Core Content for Assessm ent, lesson plans/units of \nstudy, master school schedule, perception su rvey results, professional development \nrecords, roster of teaching assignments, samples of classroom assessments, samples \nof student work products, school calendar wi th motivational and celebratory events, \nschool council meeting agenda and minut es, school council policies and bylaws, \nschool mission, belief and vision statements, school profile, School Report Card data, school visitors register, school Web page s, school/district safety plan, staff \ndevelopment agenda, staff ex tra-duty schedule, student di scipline reports, student \nwork and student/parent/staff handbooks\nInterviews with assistant pr incipal, classified staff, comm unity members, counselor, \ncurriculum resource specialist, parent s, school leadership, students and teachers\nObservations of cafeteria, classrooms, common areas, co mputer lab, media center \nand outdoor areas\n2 Performance Rating\n4.1b Leadership creates expe riences that foster the be lief that all children can \nlearn at high levels in order to motivate staff to produce continuous \nimprovement in student learning.\nSchool leadership emphasizes a commitment to high academic expectations \nbut has not ensured that all teachers dem onstrate high expectations for all \nstudents. Teachers are provided some op portunities to share success stories \nthrough team level meetings.\n4.1d Teachers and non-teaching staff are in volved in both formal and informal \ndecision-making processes rega rding teaching and learning.\nSome opportunities (team and departm ental meetings, sch ool council and \nleadership meetings) are provided for t eaching staff to be involved in decision-\nmaking that impacts teaching and learning. Few formal systems exist for non-teaching staff to be involved in decis ion-making. There are no active standing \ncommittees that would facilitate invo lvement of teaching and non-teaching \nstaff.\n4.1f The school intentionally assigns staf f to maximize opportunities for ALL \nPage 23 of 74 Standard 4 School CultureSummary Findings in: Learning EnvironmentStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n2 Performance Rating\nstudents to have acce ss to the staff's inst ructional strengths.\nThe school council has adopt ed a staff assignment policy. It is the priority of \nschool leadership to assign staff to ma ximize their instructional strengths. \nThere is some flexibility for regroupi ng students when necessary. Student \nschedules can be adjusted to meet individual learning needs.\n4.1g Teachers communicate regularly with families about individual student \nprogress (e.g., engage through conversation).\nReport cards and interim progress reports are sent home regularly to families. \nTeachers make an effort to contact ever y family through grade level teams. \nSome teachers contact paren ts with positive student progress, but this is not \na school-wide practice.\n4.1h There is evidence that the teachers and staff care ab out students and inspire \ntheir best efforts.\nMany teachers and staff exhibit a cari ng attitude for students but a nurturing \nlearning environment has not been es tablished for all students. Some \nteachers use appropriate praise and posi tive reinforcement to motivate and \ninspire students, but this does not occur in all classrooms. Classroom \ndisruptions and disrespectful rela tionships between students and teachers \nwere observed in several classrooms. Interactions between some staff and \nstudents focus primarily on behavioral compliance rather than academic \nperformance. Some studen t accomplishments were recognized but this \npractice was not observed in many classrooms.\n4.1i Multiple communication strategi es and contexts are used for the \ndissemination of informat ion to all stakeholders.\nThe school does not have a formal communi cation plan to guide face-to-face \nand electronic communica tion with stakeholders. The school uses various \nvenues to communicate with stakehol ders such as school web page, email, \ntelephone calls and home visits.\n4.1j There is evidence that student achi evement is highly valued and publicly \ncelebrated (e.g., displays of student work, assemblies).\nSchool leadership provides some opportunities to recognize and celebrate \nstudent achievement through team celebr ations, posting high test scores and \nschool announcements. Student success is regularly shared with families but \nPage 24 of 74 Standard 4 School CultureSummary Findings in: Learning EnvironmentStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n2 Performance Rating\nis rarely shared with the community.\n4.1k The school/district provides support for the physical, cultural, socio-economic, \nand intellectual needs of all students, wh ich reflects a commitment to equity \nand an appreciation of diversity.\nSchool leadership and staff have implemented numerous programs to \naddress physical and socio-economic ba rriers to learning such as Extended \nSchool Services, Behavior Coach, Youth Services Center referrals for social services, online enrichment resource s, Spartan camp and extracurricular \nactivities. School leader ship has not pr ovided professional development \nopportunities for all staff to acquire cult urally responsive instructional practices \nto meet the cultural needs of students and eliminate the significant academic \nachievement gaps that exist among students with disabilities and African American students. The sch ool has been successful in recruiting a diverse \ncertified and classified staff.\nPage 25 of 74 Standard 4 School CultureSummary Findings in: Learning EnvironmentStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n1 Performance Rating\n4.1a There is leadership support for a safe, orderly and equitable learning \nenvironment (e.g., cu lture audits/school opinion surveys).\nThe school council has adopted a sch ool safety plan and emergency \nprocedures are posted in classrooms and throughout the building. Required \nemergency drills and safety checks ar e conducted throughout the school \nyear. Students and school staff report f eeling safe in the school. The layout \nand size of the building create challe nges in monitoring safety and security \nthroughout the campus. The school council has adopted a classroom \nmanagement and discipline policy that requires Conversation Help Activity Movement Participation to be implemented. However, discipline and classroom management procedures ar e not consistently implemented, \nmonitored or corrected by school le adership. A school culture audit was \nconducted in 2007. Deficien cies identified in the audit have b een addressed \nin the comprehensive school improvement plan. However, serious classroom \nmanagement issues and classroom disrupt ions persist and create barriers to \nteaching and learning in many classr ooms. Ineffective use of the discipline \nprocedures results in excess ive in-school suspensions.\n4.1c Teachers hold high expectations for all students academically and \nbehaviorally and this is evidenced in their practice.\nTeachers express they have high acad emic and behavioral expectations for \nstudents. However, high expectations are not evident in classroom practices \nschool-wide. Inconsistent applicatio n of classroom management procedures \nleads to classroom disruptions and impedes the teaching and learning \nprocess in many classrooms. In some classrooms, there is a focus on \nbehavioral compliance rath er than academic perform ance. Student s in some \nclassrooms are allowed to disengage fr om or disrupt teaching and learning.\n4.1e Teachers recognize and accept their professional role in student success and \nfailure.\nSome teachers recognize and accept their responsib ility in student success \nand failure, but most emphasize the effe ct of other factors such as students’ \nhome situation and poverty rather th an the quality of their instruction. \nTeachers rarely analyze student work to modify their instruction for improved \nstudent achievement.\nPage 26 of 74 Stuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nSummary of recommendations in: Learning Environment\nSchool Culture\nSchool leadership should de velop a systemic process to implement and monitor the \nschool wide uniform classroom managemen t program and discipline procedures to \nensure a safe, orderly and equitable learning environment for all students.\nSchool leadership should hold all staff accountabl e for demonstrating high \nbehavioral and academic expecta tions for all students. \nSchool leadership should provide professio nal development for all staff in culturally \nresponsive and differentiated teaching strate gies and provide support to teachers in \nmodifying their instructio n to engage all students.Standard 4\nResources:\nBeaudoin, M.& Taylor, M. E. (2004). Creating a Positive School Culture: How Principals and \nTeachers Can Solve Problems Together. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. ISBN: 1-4129-\n0492-7\nConzemius, A. & O’Neill, J. (2001). Building Shared Responsibility for Student Learning. \nAlexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.\nDufour, R. & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional Learning Communities at Work. Bloomington, IN: \nNational Educational Services, co publisher Association for Supervision and Curriculum \nDevelopment.\nDuFour, R., DuFour, R. & Eaker, R. (2004). Whatever It Takes: How Professional Learning \nCommunities Respond When Kids Don't Learn. Bloomington, IN: National Educational \nService. ISBN 1932127283\nGay, G. & Banks, J. A. (2001). Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and \nPractice (Multicultural Educ ation Series, No.8). New York, NY:Teachers College Press.\nPage 27 of 74 Standard 5 Student, Family and Community SupportSummary Findings in: Learning EnvironmentStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nFindings For This Standard Are Based On:\nReview of comprehensive school improvem ent plan, documentation of referrals to \nhealth and social services , Extended School Services program overview and data, \nmaster school schedule, perception survey results, school guidance plan and student \nacademic records\nInterviews with parents, students and teachers\n3 Performance Rating\n5.1b Structures are in place to ensure th at all students have access to all the \ncurriculum (e.g., school guidance, Fam ily Resource/Youth Service Centers, \nExtended School Services).\nSchool leadership and staff collaborate to remove barriers to learning through \ninstructional assistance and resources to ensure that st udents receive the \nnecessary support to master core curr iculum. The Extended School Services \nprogram is offered after school to maximize student participation. Youth Services Center, Title I and student gu idance services collaborate frequently \nto foster a network of support for students. The Extended School Services \nprogram emphasizes math and reading.\n5.1d Students are provided wi th a variety of opportunities to receive additional \nassistance to support thei r learning, beyond the initial classroom instruction.\nStudents are provided with a variety of opportunities to receive additional \nassistance to support learning beyond the initial classroom (e.g., Extended \nSchool Services, literacy and math in terventions). Co-curricular opportunities \nsuch as piano, orchestra, visual ar ts and band are provided for students. \nOpportunities are provided for student s with unique learning needs (e.g., non-\nEnglish speakers, hearing impaired, visually impaired and special needs \nstudents). Youth Services Center , guidance department and behavior \ncoaches provide student suppor t for academic re-engagement.\n5.1e The school maintains an accurate student record system that provides timely \ninformation pertinent to the student's academic and educational development.\nStudents’ educational dev elopment and academic records are maintained \nand secured by the school. Student reco rds, including Individual Learning \nPlans, are complete and only available to appr opriate personnel. Infinite \nCampus Technology is used to organi ze and maintain electronic student \nrecords. No access log was posted to document names of staff members who \nPage 28 of 74 Standard 5 Student, Family and Community SupportSummary Findings in: Learning EnvironmentStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n3 Performance Rating\nhave access to student records. The school provides resources for supporting \nthe student re cord system.\nPage 29 of 74 Standard 5 Student, Family and Community SupportSummary Findings in: Learning EnvironmentStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n2 Performance Rating\n5.1a Families and the community are acti ve partners in the educational process \nand work together with the school dist rict staff to promote programs and \nservices for all students.\nThe school council has a policy whic h addresses parent involvement, but \nthere is no committee policy that addresses recruitment of parents, \ncommunity members, minorities and ot her stakeholders to serve on school \ncouncil committees. School leader ship has conducted an open house and \nprovided parents with in formation about school committees. At the present \ntime, there are no standing committees in the school. There are some programs coordinated by the Youth Serv ices Center Director that bring \ntogether parents, student s, and resources outside the school for the purpose \nof eliminating cultural and social-economic barriers to learning. There is \nlimited communication between the school and stakeholders. Discrimination \nand grievance procedures and appeals process are communicated to parents \nand students through the Stuart Middle School Student Handbook.\n5.1c The school/district provides orga nizational struct ures and supports \ninstructional practices to re duce barriers to learning.\nA variety of instructional materials and resources promoting student support \nare available. School leadership has developed procedures to refer students \nwith special learning needs and behavior al problems for appropriate services. \nA procedure to identify st udents who experience le arning problems has been \nestablished and programs (e.g., Englis h as a second language services, \nextended school service program) are in place to support their learning \nneeds. Some teachers have not received tr aining on strategies to differentiate \ninstruction and address diversity. There is a limited advisor advisee program \navailable for Spartan Academy students but this program is not extended to other students.\nPage 30 of 74 Stuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nSummary of recommendations in: Learning Environment\nStudent, Family and Community Support\nSchool leadership shou ld, in collaboration with repr esentation of all stakeholders, \ndevelop and implement a formal communi cation plan that promotes meaningful \ndialogue between the school and fa milies regarding student learning.Standard 5\nResources:\nBarr, R. & Parrett, W. (2006). The Kids Left Behind. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.\nMarzano, R. (2003). What Works in Schools. Alexandra, VA: Association for Supervision \nand Curriculum Development. \nPrincipal's Guide to Effective Family Involvement. (2002). Gaithersburg,MD.: Aspen \nPublishers.\nPage 31 of 74 Standard 6 Professional Growth , Development, and EvaluationSummary Findings in: Learning EnvironmentStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nFindings For This Standard Are Based On:\nReview of categorical program financial re ports, certified perso nnel evaluation plan \nand process, comprehensive school improvement plan, dist rict personnel evaluation \nsystem and documentation of implementa tion, employee handbooks, eWalk data, \nfaculty meeting agenda, Implementation an d Impact Checks, individual professional \ngrowth plans, Interstate School Leadership Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) Standards, \nKentucky Performance Report disaggre gated data, needs assessment data, \nperception survey results, professional dev elopment records, sc hool council policies \nand bylaws and School Report Card data\nInterviews with assistant principal, assi stant superintendent(s), classified staff, \nparents, school council members, school leader ship, students and teachers\nObservations of classrooms, common areas and media center\n3 Performance Rating\n6.2a The school/district provides a clearly defined evaluation process.\nThe district has a clearly defined evaluation plan that is used by Stuart Middle \nSchool. It is outlined in the faculty handbook provided to all teachers at the \nbeginning of the school year. Assura nce is provided that processes and \nprocedures related to evaluation of bo th classified and certified employees \nwere discussed within the first thirty days of the 2008-2009 school year.\n6.2d Leadership prov ides and implements a process of personnel evaluation which \nmeets or exceeds standards se t in statute and regulation.\nAll classified and certified personnel are evaluated in accordance with \nrequirements set forth in state statute and regulation.\nPage 32 of 74 Standard 6 Professional Growth , Development, and EvaluationSummary Findings in: Learning EnvironmentStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n2 Performance Rating\n6.1a There is evidence of support for the long-term professional growth needs of \nthe individual staff members. This incl udes both instructional and leadership \ngrowth.\nAll teachers meet state requiremen ts for the mandated 24 hours of \nprofessional development. Due to th e wealth of professional resources \noffered by the district, school-based Gold Days, and approved departmental \nactivities, many teachers well exceed those requirements; however, there is \nno school professional developmen t committee, needs assessment, or \nprofessional development plan in plac e to ensure focus or support for long-\nrange plans for instructiona l and leadership growth. So me classified staff are \nrequired to have professional development, but that is a district initiative.\n6.1b The school has an intentional plan fo r building instructional capacity through \non-going professi onal development.\nSchool leadership does not develop and implement an on-going intentional \nplan of professional development designed for the purpose of building instructional capacity. School-based professional development, planned on \nan annual basis by the instructional leadership team, does not always build on \nprevious training experiences or lead to follow-up activities.\n6.1c Staff development priorities are se t in alignment with goals for student \nperformance and the individual prof essional growth plans of staff.\nProfessional development activities ar e not always aligned to the school’s \nlearning goals. Clear connections are not always made between teacher \nevaluations, professional growth plans, and professional development. Due to \ninconsistent monitoring of professional growth plans and lack of guidance from evaluators, flexible professional development choices often fall outside \nthe priorities set for alignment wi th goals for student performance.\n6.1d Plans for school improvement directly connect goals for student learning and \nthe priorities set for the school and di strict staff development activities.\nThroughout the comprehensive schoo l improvement plan, professional \ndevelopment activities are targeted as strategies for addressing student \nachievement. On paper, connection s are made that li nk professional \ndevelopment to learning goals. However, since the plan is not fully implemented as written, the connections do no t always become reality.\nPage 33 of 74 Standard 6 Professional Growth , Development, and EvaluationSummary Findings in: Learning EnvironmentStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n2 Performance Rating\n6.1e Professional development is on-going and job-embedded.\nMany teachers view professional devel opment as an isolated experience that \nhas little relevance to their daily cl assroom performance; however, some \npockets of on-going, job-embedded prof essional development are displayed \nthrough faculty members sharing expertise, mentoring and networking. A plan is not in place to ensure that pr ofessional development is incorporated \ninto the school day and year in a cycle that moves from initial learning to \npractice to additional learning until mastery is achieved.\n6.1f Professional development planning show s a direct connection to an analysis \nof student achievement data.\nMultiple sources of student achievement data are analyzed, but it is unclear \nhow the results of the anal ysis determine professional development needs. \nThere is inconsistent monitoring of the impact of profession al development on \nstaff behavior or student achievement in order to effectively plan follow-up \nexperiences. District professional development proposal forms ask for \ninformation on how the activity is tied to student need; however, the \ninformation supplied was vague and di d not supply adequate information to \njustify a clear connection.\n6.2b Leadership provides t he fiscal resources for the appropriate professional \ngrowth and development of certif ied staff based on identified needs.\nSchool leadership expends professional development funds as directed by \nthe comprehensive sc hool improvement plan which is based on identified \nneeds. Additional funds are allocated at the discretion of the school principal \non a first come first served basis to te achers requesting funding to attend \nconferences or workshops not spec ified in the comprehensive school \nimprovement plan. Teachers choose their own flexible professional \ndevelopment with little guidance or m onitoring from leadership to guarantee \nits connection to identified needs or their professi onal growth plan. School \ncouncil and leadership does not hav e a plan to address the equitable \nallocation and use of prof essional development funds.\n6.2c The school/district effe ctively uses the employee ev aluation and the individual \nprofessional growth plan to improve staff proficiency.\nSchool leadership ensures that all staff members are evaluated according to \ndesignated timelines usin g the district documentation forms. Individual \nPage 34 of 74 Standard 6 Professional Growth , Development, and EvaluationSummary Findings in: Learning EnvironmentStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n2 Performance Rating\nprofessional growth plans are not co nsistently or collaboratively developed \nwith evaluators, tied to evaluation findings, or monitored for progress. Some \nstaff members view individual professional growth plans as a district \nassignment that is checked off for comp liance rather than as an avenue for \nimpacting professional practice.\n6.2f Leadership uses the evaluation process to provide teachers with the follow-up \nand support to chan ge behavior and instructional practice.\nSchool leadership completes all re quired documents in the evaluation \nprocess. A system of follow-up and su pport is not in place to adequately \nfacilitate changes in instructional prac tice or teacher behavior. For example, \npost-observation conference documentatio n for some teache rs consists only \nof scripting the lesson with little or no regard to how teacher behavior should \nchange as a result of what the evaluator observed in the classroom.\nPage 35 of 74 Standard 6 Professional Growth , Development, and EvaluationSummary Findings in: Learning EnvironmentStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n1 Performance Rating\n6.2e The school/district improvement pl an identifies specific instructional \nleadership needs, has stra tegies to address them, and uses the effective \ninstructional leadership act requirements as a resource to accomplish these \ngoals.\nLeadership professional growth needs are not addressed in the \ncomprehensive school improvement plan.\nPage 36 of 74 Stuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nSummary of recommendations in: Learning Environment\nProfessional Growth, Development, and Evaluation\nSchool leadership in collaboration with sc hool council should establish a committee \nto guide all aspects of professional de velopment. A specific needs assessment with \ninput from all teachers should be in pl ace and used for the formulation of a \nprofessional development plan . The plan should address both long-and short-term \nprofessional development n eeds and guide allocation of fiscal resources.\nSchool leadership should en sure that a clear connec tion is made between teacher \nevaluations, individual growth plan s, and professional development.\nSchool leadership professional developm ent needs should be identified in the \ncomprehensive school improvement plan.Standard 6\nResources:\nDanielson, C. & McGreal, T. (2000). Teacher Evaluation to Enhance Professional Practice. \nAlexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development. \nDeveloping Individual Professional Growth Plans. (Available from the Kentucky Department \nof Education, 500 Mero Street, Frankfort, KY 40601). SISI Toolkit, Standard 6. \nhttp://www.education.ky.gov/SISI_Toolkit/Standard%206/ \nDocuments/individual%20Professional%20Growth%20Plan%20-%20example.doc\nGuskey, T. R. (1999). Evaluating Professional Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin \nPress, Inc. \nProfessional Development Resources. ((Available from the Kentucky Department of \nEducation, 500 Mero Street, Frankfort, KY 40601). \nhttp://education.ky.gov/KDE/Administrat ive+Resources/Professional+Development/\nPage 37 of 74 Standard 7 LeadershipSummary Findings in: EfficiencyStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nFindings For This Standard Are Based On:\nReview of certified personnel evaluation plan and process, cl assroom assessments, \ncommittee meeting minutes and agenda, co mprehensive school improvement plan, \ncurriculum documents, curriculum maps, employee handbooks, eWalk data, facility inspection reports, faculty meeting agenda, he alth department inspection reports, \nindividual professional growth plans, In terstate School Lead ership Licensure \nConsortium (ISLLC) Standards, Kentucky Pe rformance Report disaggregated data, \nKentucky's Core Content for Assessment, lesson plans/units of study, perception \nsurvey results, professional development re cords, safe schools data reports, samples \nof classroom assessments, samples of student work products , school budget and \nallocations, school council meeting agenda and minutes, school council policies and \nbylaws, school improvement planning team meeting minutes an d agenda, school \nmission, belief and vision statements, school Web pages, school/dis trict safety plan, \nSoftware Technology, Incorporated re ports, staff development agenda, student \ndiscipline reports, student work, student/teacher ration, teacher portfolios and trophy cases\nInterviews with assistant principal, assi stant superintendent(s), classified staff, \ncommunity members, parents, principal, school council members, students and \nteachers\nObservations of classr ooms and common areas\n2 Performance Rating\n7.1a Leadership ha s developed and sustained a shared vision.\nThe school council has no t adopted a vision and be lief statements. The \nprincipal can articulate a clear vision for the school but has not communicated \nthat vision to all stakeholders. Scho ol leadership recently reviewed the \nmission statement. The leadership team, faculty an d school council \ndeveloped the mission statement, but few community stakeholders were \ninvolved. Many staff members could not articulate what t he mission statement \nmeant and it was not widely displayed in the building.\n7.1b Leadership de cisions are focused on studen t academic performance and are \ndata-driven and collaborative.\nThere is a collaborative process in plac e to use data to fo cus on academic \nperformance. School leadership, content departments, grade level teams and \nthe instructional leadership team regu larly review and analyze data from the \ndistrict’s classroom assessment system, Kentucky Performance Report and \nthe Scholastic Reading Inventory. Th e school council re ceives reports \nPage 38 of 74 Standard 7 LeadershipSummary Findings in: EfficiencyStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n2 Performance Rating\nregarding student performance data. T he data is sometimes used to change \nintervention groupings for targeted students in re ading and math.\n7.1c There is evidence that all administra tors have a growth plan focused on the \ndevelopment of effective leadership skills.\nSome administrators have developed an individual growth plan for the year. \nSome of the plans have no t been completed in a collaborative effort, reviewed \nor signed by an administrator. Administra tors format their growth plans using \nsome school priorities and leadership ski lls required by the demands of their \nroles. Some growth plans have one or more components that reflect the \nschool’s efforts to build a better culture and support a safe and orderly environment.\n7.1d There is evidence that the school/district leadership team disaggregates data \nfor use in meeting the needs of a diverse population, communicates the information to school staff and incor porates the data systematically into \nschool's plan.\nSchool leadership along with the inst ructional leadership team, grade level \nteams and academic depa rtments disaggregate dat a from the Kentucky \nPerformance Report and Core Content Assessments. Result s from the data \nare shared with the staff. School lead ership and staff then use the data to \ntarget students for more intensive inte rventions. Data is used to identify \nsignificant achievement gaps among population groups, but the population \ngroups are not identified and ta rgeted in the comprehensive school \nimprovement plan.\n7.1e Leadership en sures all instructional staff have access to curriculum related \nmaterials and the training necessary to use curriculum and data resources \nrelating to the learning goals for Kentucky public schools.\nSchool leadership provides teachers with some training on how to understand \nand use Jefferson County’ s aligned curriculum and pacing guides. Teachers \nhave access to district and state curriculum docume nts and other curricular \nmaterials. School leadership facilitates teacher use of district classroom \nassessment system data analysis by department and gr ade level teams.\n7.1f Leadership en sures that time is protected and allocated to focus on curricular \nand instructional issues.\nPage 39 of 74 Standard 7 LeadershipSummary Findings in: EfficiencyStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n2 Performance Rating\nSchool council has adopted an instruct ional practices policy and leadership \nattempts to ensure that it is implem ented so that students are engaged in \nsound instructional activities. Faculty, department and team meetings are held \non a regular basis. Grade level teams have daily common pl anning time and \nare expected to meet as a team weekly or more ofte n if needed. Teachers are \nexpected to deliver a lesson in the instructional framework that lists \nobjectives, a sponge activity, and the expec tation that class start on time. The \nframework provides a structure for teacher s to efficiently pl an lessons tied to \ncore content that maximize their use of instructional time. Many classrooms \nhave behavior issues that hinder the e fficient delivery of instruction to support \nproficient student performance.\n7.1g Leadership plans and allocates resources, monitors progress, provides the \norganizational infrastructure, and removes barriers in order to sustain continuous school improvement.\nSchool leadership provides an infrastr ucture to implement interventions in \nreading and math to address achievement gaps. School leadership monitors \nthe school’s allocation of resources by conducting learning walks and using \nthe evaluation of certified staff. The school’s efforts on implementation of \nConversation Help Activity Movement Participation program is intended to \ncontribute to leadership’s efforts to remove barriers to school improvement \nand student achievement. The Conversation Help Activity Movement \nParticipation program is not being co nsistently implement ed schoolwide to \nbring about desired student and teacher behaviors that should result in \ncontinuous school improvement. Monito ring progress within the school \ndepends mostly on assessing Core Content for Assessment data and does \nnot always reflect the impact of reso urces on continuous improvement or \nfocus the resources where needed most.\n7.1h The school/district leadership provides the organizational policy and resource \ninfrastructure necessary for the impl ementation and maintenance of a safe \nand effective learning environment.\nSchool council has adopted disciplin e, classroom management, and school \nsafety policies to ensure a safe, healthy, orderly and equitable learning and working environment. Implementation of these policies and procedures is not \nhaving a profound effect on behavior that results in a productive, meaningful \nlearning environment. The aging buildi ng is being maintained in a clean and \ninviting way but is difficult for schoo l leadership to monitor because of the \nbuilding design. School leadership follo ws the district’s safety plan and has \nPage 40 of 74 Standard 7 LeadershipSummary Findings in: EfficiencyStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n2 Performance Rating\nprocedures to deal with various emerg ency situations that might arise. Two \nfull-time security personnel assist th e administrative team and staff in an \nattempt to maintain orderly cla ssrooms, hallways and common areas.\n7.1j There is evidence that the SBDM co uncil has an intenti onal focus on student \nacademic performance.\nSchool council meeting agenda and minutes show some discussions, \nconcerns and actions relative to stud ent achievement. Council discussions \nalso reflect some focus on management issues rather than issues reflecting \nimpact on higher student achievement. The council receives some reports \nfrom grade level teams and content areas related to the analysis of \ncontinuous assessment data. No implementation and impact checks to \nmonitor progress of th e school improvement plan were found. School \nleadership submits their school improvem ent plan to the designated district \nleadership for review and feedback as specified by district requirements.\n7.1k There is evidence that the principal demonstrates leadership skills in the \nareas of academic performance, learning environment and efficiency.\nThe principal has begun the process of developing the staff into a cohesive \nschool team focused on working toget her to maintain a student-centered \nenvironment. She has established the urge ncy that a safe, orderly learning \nenvironment is nece ssary to deliver good instruct ion. She has articulated the \nexpectation that staff is accountable fo r contributing to individual student \nsuccess and continuous school improvem ent. Monitoring which includes \ninformal walks, instructional learning walks, review of teacher evidence binders and the evaluation process is in the initial stage of implementation. \nThe principal is using school level and district level resources in an attempt to \ncreate a viable, accountable learning and working environment for students \nand staff.\nPage 41 of 74 Standard 7 LeadershipSummary Findings in: EfficiencyStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n1 Performance Rating\n7.1i Leadership provides a process for the development and the implementation \nof council policy based on anticipated needs.\nThe school council has no t adopted all policies as required by Kentucky \nRevised Statute. School leadership and the school council are currently \nrevising and updating policies to be compliant with statutory requirements. Few staff members have a working knowledge of the council’s policies and some policies (e.g., curriculum, schoo l schedule) have not been developed.\nPage 42 of 74 Stuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nSummary of recommendations in: Efficiency\nLeadership\nSchool Council should immediately develop and adopt all required policies that are \nmandated by Kentucky Revised Statutes.\nSchool leadership should fo cus the school council on ac ademic performance issues \nthat address root causes for weak st udent performance. Strategies should be \nimplemented in the comprehensive school improvement plan to close identified \nachievement gaps.\nSchool leadership should m onitor instructional strategi es to ensure effective \nindividualized feedback to staff that will result in desired growth for school improvement.\nSchool leadership shou ld ensure that all teachers, es pecially first and second year \ncandidates, can incorporate appropriate st andards, curriculum an d assessment into \nmeaningful unit design and daily lesson planningStandard 7\nResources:\nDuFour, R. and Eaker, R. E. (2005). On Common Ground. Bloomington, IN: National \nEducational Service. \nDuFour, R., DuFour, R. & Eaker, R. (2004). Whatever It Takes: How Professional Learning \nCommunities Respond When Kids Don't Learn. Bloomington, IN: National Educational \nService. ISBN 1932127283\nJohnson, R. S. (2002). Using Data to Close the Achievement Gap: How to Measure Equity in \nOur Schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.\nMarzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: translating research into action. Alexandria, \nVA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. \nWhitaker, T. (2006). What Great Principals Do Differently. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.\nPage 43 of 74 Standard 8 School Organization and Fiscal ResourcesSummary Findings in: EfficiencyStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nFindings For This Standard Are Based On:\nReview of categorical program financial reports, classroom a ssessments, committee \nmeeting minutes and agenda, comprehensiv e school improvement plan, curriculum \ndocuments, district budget and allocations, enrollment data, eWalk data, facility \ninspection reports, health department insp ection reports, individual professional \ngrowth plans, Interstate School Leadership Licensure Consortium (ISLLC) Standards, \nKentucky Performance Report disaggrega ted data, Kentucky's Core Content for \nAssessment, lesson plans/units of study, Local Educator Assignment Data Report \n(LEAD), master school schedule, organizati onal charts, perception survey results, \nrecords of teacher certification/experience, roster of teaching assignments, safe \nschools data reports, samples of written correspondence to staff & stakeholders, \nschedule for co-curricular offerings, schoo l budget and allocations, school council \nmeeting agenda and minutes, school counc il policies and bylaws, school event \ncalendar, school financial repo rts, school mission, belief and vision stat ements, school \nprofile, School Report Card data, school We b pages, school/district safety plan, state \nstatute and regulation, student/parent/staff handbooks, student/t eacher ration and \nteacher portfolios\nInterviews with assistant principal, assist ant superintendent(s), counselor, curriculum \nresource specialist, district leadership, Family Resource/Youth Services Center \npersonnel, media sp ecialist, parents, sc hool council members, school leadership, \nstudents and teachers\nObservations of cafeteria, classrooms, common areas, co mputer lab and media center\n3 Performance Rating\n8.1b The master class schedule reflects all students have access to all the \ncurriculum.\nSufficient course offerings are provid ed within the master schedule for all \nstudents to address Kent ucky Curriculum Standards. Chorus, band, physical \neducation, practical living and Span ish are examples of related arts \nopportunities that students ro tate through on a twelve week basis. Instruction, \nthrough a combination of self-contained, collaborative and resource room \nmodels, is provided for the exceptiona l children's educational needs. Some \nstudents with individual education plan s are mainstreamed into core content \nclasses according to ability. Self-conta ined special needs students participate \nin some regular classrooms, (e.g., musi c, physical educat ion) with support \nfrom instructional assistants and accord ing to individual educational plans. \nThose students identified as gifted and talented are provided with enrichment \nopportunities through advanced course s to supplement instruction and \nenhance learning beyond regular classroom offerings.\nPage 44 of 74 Standard 8 School Organization and Fiscal ResourcesSummary Findings in: EfficiencyStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n3 Performance Rating\n8.1c The instructional and non-instructio nal staff are allocated and organized \nbased upon the learning needs of all students.\nThe school is allocated certified and cl assified staff in accordance with the \ndistrict staffing policy. All teachers ar e certified to teach in their assigned \nareas. The school council has a staff assi gnment policy stipulating that staff \nassignments be made based on student learning needs with the option of \nmodifying assignments as needed accordi ng to changes in educational goals \nand unique learning needs of students . Priority preference in scheduling \nclasses is afforded to exceptional need s students to ensure that special \nneeds identified in individual educat ional plans are being addressed. \nCollaborative teachers and instructional assistants are assigned to some \nclassrooms for instruction assistance based on student need. The district \nprovides additional staff in support of identified need s at the school (e.g., Title \nI staff, content area coaches, behavior coaches).\nPage 45 of 74 Standard 8 School Organization and Fiscal ResourcesSummary Findings in: EfficiencyStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n2 Performance Rating\n8.1e Staff promotes team planning vertic ally and horizontally across content areas \nand grade configurations that is fo cused on the goals, objectives and \nstrategies in the improvement plan (e .g., common planning time for content \narea teachers; emphasis on learning time and not se at time; and integrated \nunits).\nThe school has common daily team planni ng time built into the master \nschedule for each grade leve l, but there are no proced ures in place to monitor \nthe effective use of the ti me. Team planning time does afford opportunities for \ndaily horizontal planning but there are limited opportunities for vertical planning within the school or among schools at entry and exit points. The \nopportunity to discuss and plan for indivi dual learning needs of students is \navailable during common planning ti me. Departmental meeting time is \nsometimes used for professional development activities, (e.g., instructional planning, curriculum development, di saggregation of student performance \ndata) but there are no proc edures in place to moni tor the effective use of \nplanning time to determ ine the impact on instructional practices and student \nperformance.\n8.1f The schedule is intentionally aligned with the school's mission and designed \nto ensure that all staff provide qualit y instructional time (e.g., flex time, \norganization based on developmental nee ds of students, interdisciplinary \nunits, etc.).\nThe school master schedule provides ample opportunities for students to \nreceive quality instruction appropriate for age and grade levels. Few teachers implement a variety of effective instru ctional strategies and provide expanded \ninstructional opportunities for learni ng. The schedule pr omotes successful \nstudent performance and supports the mission of the school. The master \nschedule is flexible and some modifications are made to address specific \ndevelopmental and instru ctional needs of student s. Self contained, \ncollaborative and resource room models are used to deliver instruction to \nmeet the educational needs of exceptional children. Additional math and \nreading intervention instruction is prov ided to assist thos e students requiring \nadditional time to master content.\n8.2c School councils and school boards analyze fund ing and other resource \nrequests to ensure the requests are tied to the school's plan and identified \npriority needs.\nDistrict leadership reviews the co mprehensive school improvement plan to \nPage 46 of 74 Standard 8 School Organization and Fiscal ResourcesSummary Findings in: EfficiencyStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n2 Performance Rating\ndetermine if funds are appropriately assi gned to priority needs of the school. \nSchool council funds for materials and supplies are equally allocated to \ndepartments. The comprehe nsive school improvement plan indicates funding \nfor various component activities, bu t these components are not regularly \nmonitored to ensure that expenditures are based on identified priority needs. \nNo written policy or proc edures exist to ensure fu nds are expended in an \nequitable, rather than equal manner, according to the comprehensive school \nimprovement plan.\n8.2d State and Federal Program Resources are allocated and integrated (Safe \nSchools, Title 1, Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Family \nResource/Youth Service Centers, Ex tended School Services) to address \nstudent needs identified by the school/district.\nCategorical funds are allocated to su pport identified student needs and \naccording to specific program guidelines, but program strategies are not always monitored for effectiveness in meeting comprehensive school improvement plan goals or impact on student learning. Ti tle I and extended \nschool service funding is embedded within the comprehensive school \nimprovement plan. Title I funds are bein g used to supply three supplemental \nsupport staff members and to provide pr ofessional development opportunities \nfor staff. Extended school service fund s are being used to support after \nschool supplemental instruction for th ose students needing assistance. Some \ncategorical program funds are being integrated by the school to address \nidentified student needs.\nPage 47 of 74 Standard 8 School Organization and Fiscal ResourcesSummary Findings in: EfficiencyStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n1 Performance Rating\n8.1a There is evidence that t he school is organized to maxi mize use of all available \nresources to support high st udent and staff performance.\nAccording to a district school based de cision making policy review dated June \n26, 2008, two policies requir ed by Kentucky Revised Statutes are missing and \nother required policies are recommended for review and revision. Current school council policies are fragmented and incomp lete. Recent council \nminutes reflect that the current council, under the leadership of the principal, \nhas begun the process of developing , reviewing, revising and adopting \nrequired and best practice policies that will guide the school decision making \nprocess. The school council has a budget policy that calls for a budget \ncommittee to develop and administer the school budget. However, this \ncommittee is not functioning and there is no plan that gui des the development \nof budgets or outlines the methodology for budget decision making. Budgets \nhave been drafted by the principal and presented to the council for approval \nwith some opportunity for input from st aff. The school allocates resources, but \nthere is no process in place to measure the effectiveness of these \nexpenditures to meet the objectives of t he comprehensive school \nimprovement plan or promote high stud ent and staff perfor mance. The school \nhas recently pursued external resources in the form of grants (e.g., Fund for \nthe Arts grant, Health Promotion: School of Excellence grant) with some \nsuccess.\n8.1d There is evidence that the staff makes efficient use of instructional time to \nmaximize student learning.\nThe school council has not adopted best practice policies specific to \nprotection of instructional time. Discip line, classroom mana gement and school \nsafety policies have been identified as needing revision by the district school \ncouncil policy review. The Conversation Help Activity Movement Participation \nbehavioral management mo del has been adopted but is not consistently \nadministered by all staff or monitore d by administration for effectiveness. \nMany classrooms lack the structure conducive to an appropriate learning environment. School leadership has implemented so me procedures that limit \nclassroom interruptions (e.g., limit an nouncements to beginning and ending of \nthe school day). Assembly programs and ac tivities such as field trips that \noccur during instructional time usually re late to general learning goals. Most \nteachers assume hall duty between cl asses to monitor transitions and \nencourage students to be in class on time. Bell ring er sponge activities are \nused at the beginning of some classes to immediately engage students.\nPage 48 of 74 Standard 8 School Organization and Fiscal ResourcesSummary Findings in: EfficiencyStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n1 Performance Rating\n8.2a The school/district provides a clearly defined process (in accordance with the \nschool council allocation formula) to pr ovide equitable and consistent use of \nfiscal resources.\nThe school council has approved a budg et policy, but the policy does not \ndefine a process to ensure equitable di stribution of funds. A formal process \nfor developing and implementing the budget is not clearly or fully defined.\n8.2b The school/district budget reflects decisions made about discretionary funds \nand resources are directed by an assessm ent of need or a required plan, all \nof which consider appropriate data.\nThe school council does no t have a specific policy and school leadership has \nnot established procedures fo r the distribution of discretionary funds. There is \nno formal plan of action or needs assessment format designed to tie \nexpenditures of discretionary funds to components of the comprehensive \nschool improvement plan.\nPage 49 of 74 Stuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nSummary of recommendations in: Efficiency\nSchool Organization and Fiscal Resources\nSchool council should adopt policy that en sures equal access to the curriculum for \nall students.\nSchool council should develop a budget policy and schoo l leadership should \nimplement procedures that outline the process for request and distribution of \ndiscretionary funds. This policy should ma ndate that all expendi tures be aligned with \nthe comprehensive school impr ovement plan, vision an d mission of the school. \nExpenditures should be monitored for ef fectiveness and their impact on student \nperformance. This policy should be commu nicated to all stakeholders and monitored \nfor compliance.Standard 8\nResources:\nKentucky Association of School Councils - http://www.kasc.net/\nMarzano, R. J., Waters, T. & McNulty, B.A. (2005). School Leadership That Works: From \nResearch To Results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curricumum \nDevelopment. \nMarzano, R. J., Pickering, D.J. & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom Instruction that works: \nresearch-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA: Association \nfor Supervision and Curriculum Development. \nSISI Toolkit Standard 8. (Available from the Kentucky Department of Education, 500 Mero \nStreet, Frankfort, KY 40601). http://www.education.ky.gov/ \nSISI_Toolkit/Standard%208/Standard%208%20By%20Standards.htm\nPage 50 of 74 Standard 9 Comprehensive and Effective PlanningSummary Findings in: EfficiencyStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nFindings For This Standard Are Based On:\nReview of committee meeting minute s and agenda, comprehensive district \nimprovement plan, Kentucky Performance Report disaggregated data, perception survey results, school council meetin g agenda and minutes, school improvement \nplanning team meeting minutes and ag enda, school mission, belief and vision \nstatements and school Web pages\nInterviews with assistant prin cipal, counselor, district leadership, parents, principal, \nschool council members, school leadership and teachers\n2 Performance Rating\n9.1a There is evidence that a collaborativ e process was used to develop the vision, \nbeliefs, mission and goals that engag e the school community as a community \nof learners.\nSchool leadership collabo rated with faculty members, parent members of the \nschool council and the Youth Services Center advisory council in the review of \nthe school’s mission statement. There was minimum effort by school \nleadership to solicit participation from other stakeholder groups. but there \nwas little or no participation from othe r stakeholder groups. School leadership \nand faculty collaboratively developed the goals for school improvement. The \nschool does not have a written vision or belief statements that direct the \nschool planning process.\n9.2a There is evidence the school/district planning process involves collecting, \nmanaging and analyzing data.\nSchool leadership collabo rated with the faculty an d reviewed, disaggregated \nand analyzed data from Kentucky Perf ormance Report, No Child Left Behind \nReport, Equity and Culture Audit, dist rict core content assessments, and the \ndistrict review of school council operations. School leadership reported this information to the school council. Teacher made assess ment data and the \nreview of student work data we re not used in this process.\n9.2b The school/district uses data for school impr ovement planning.\nSchool leadership relied on student per formance data and findings from the \n2007 Equity and Culture Audit Report as sources in identifying needs and the \ndevelopment of goals, priorities an d action steps for the comprehensive \nschool improvement plan.\nPage 51 of 74 Standard 9 Comprehensive and Effective PlanningSummary Findings in: EfficiencyStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n2 Performance Rating\n9.3a School and district plans reflect learni ng research and curre nt local, state and \nnational expectations for student lear ning and are viewed by the planning \nteam.\nThe school improvement planning team does not reference a process for the \nreview of validated, research-based principles of teaching and learning in writing the comprehensive school improvement plan. So me district, state and \nnational performance and cont ent standards were used to determine goals for \nstudent learning. The comprehensive school improvement plan includes \ncomponents for all content areas, scho ol council and equity and culture.\n9.3b The school/district analyzes thei r students' unique learning needs.\nSchool leadership facilitates an annual analysis of the disaggregated student \nperformance data from the Kentucky Performance Report with the school council. While analysis of disaggreg ated data is the topic for some \ndepartment meetings, the results are not being consistently used to provide \ntimely interventions for students with unmet learning needs. Populations with \nachievement gaps are not identified in the 2008-2009 comprehensive school \nimprovement plan.\n9.3c The desired results for student learning are defined.\nThe desired results for student acad emic and behavior performance goals \nidentified in the comprehensive schoo l improvement plan are clearly and \nconcisely stated, measurable and mo st accompanied by benchmarks. \nHowever, student population groups with achievement gaps, identified in the \nNo Child Left Behind Report, are not identified in the co mprehensive school \nimprovement plan. The comprehensive school improvem ent plan does not \nspecifically identify strategies that ad dress the unmet learning needs of these \npopulation groups.\n9.4a Perceived strengths and limitations of the school/district instructional and \norganizational effectiveness are id entified using the collected data.\nSome data is collected through collab oration with parents of the school \ncouncil, Family Service Center adv isory council and from open house \nactivities for parents and students concer ning their perception of the strengths \nand limitations in the instructional an d organizational effectiveness of the \nschool. School leadersh ip does not solicit or receive input from all \nstakeholder groups.\nPage 52 of 74 Standard 9 Comprehensive and Effective PlanningSummary Findings in: EfficiencyStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n2 Performance Rating\n9.4b The school/district goals for buildi ng and strengthening the capacity of the \nschool/district instructional and or ganizational effectiveness are defined.\nThe stated goals of the school improv ement plan are clear ly and concisely \nwritten in measurable terms with most accompanied by benchmarks to measure progress over time. They are focused on improving the school’s organizational and instructional effe ctiveness. Achievem ent gaps are not \nidentified in the comprehensive school impr ovement plan. Therefore, it is not \nevident that the school’s organizatio nal and instructional effectiveness is \nsufficient to meet the unmet learni ng needs of these identified student \npopulations.\n9.5a The action steps for school improvement are aligned with the school \nimprovement goals and objectives.\nMost action components in the comprehensive scho ol improvement plan are \naligned to the goals. However, stud ent population groups with achievement \ngaps are not identified in the improvem ent plan, and it is not clear how a \nculture of high expectations and hi gh achievement for all students will be \naccomplished.\n9.5b The plan identifies the resources, timelines, and persons responsible for \ncarrying out each activity.\nResources for implementation of acti on components are identified in the \ncomprehensive school improvement plan . Timelines are established for the \naction components. The timeline for the majority of the components is one \nyear and extended time frames beyond the completion of a strategy may \ndelay impact on student performance. Individuals responsible for leading and \nimplementing the action components represent all content areas.\n9.5c The means for evaluating the effe ctiveness of the improvement plan are \nestablished.\nA method to determine the effectiv eness of the comprehensive school \nimprovement plan is identified. Scho ol leadership has initiated the \ndevelopment of an evidence binder which is maintained by each instructional \nstaff member to measure the impa ct of the comprehensive school \nimprovement plan. To date, the process has not been fully implemented, and \nsome teachers do not have a clear understanding of the purpose and \nexpectation of the evidence binders.\nPage 53 of 74 Standard 9 Comprehensive and Effective PlanningSummary Findings in: EfficiencyStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n2 Performance Rating\n9.5d The improvement plan is aligned with the school's profile, beliefs, mission, \ndesired results for student learning and analysis of in structional and \norganizational effectiveness.\nActivities in the comprehen sive school improvement plan are aligned with the \nschool’s mission statement, but there ar e no written belief statements for \nstudent learning. Many activities incl uded in the plan hav e been demonstrated \nas best practice (e.g., inquiry based instruction, Marzano strategies, Bloom’s \nTaxonomy) or research based programs (e.g., Read 180, Success Maker, \nConnected Mathematics Project) that yi eld desired results for student learning.\n9.6a The plan is implemented as developed.\nAlthough school leadership has developed a process to ensure the \ncomprehensive school improvement plan is implemented as developed, there \nis limited direction for the implementa tion. At present, there is limited \nemphasis on the implementation of the comprehensive school improvement \nplan and some staff members are not aware of the plan. Many cannot \narticulate the importance of it s impact on student achievement.\n9.6b The school evaluates the degree to whic h it achieves the goals and objectives \nfor student learning set by the plan.\nSchool leadership has developed a pr ocess to measure the impact of the \ncomprehensive school improvement plan ’s goals on student learning. The \nplan states the Instructional leadersh ip team and faculty will analyze student \nperformance data (e.g., student behavior referral logs, core content \nassessment data, other student assessm ent data) to determine the impact of \nthe action components on student achievement an d to use the results to \ninform instructional practices. The process has not been fully implemented.\n9.6c The school evaluates the degree to wh ich it achieves the expected impact on \nclassroom practice and student pe rformance specified in the plan.\nThe comprehensive school improvement pl an identifies a variety of data \nsources to be used to evaluate the g oals of the plan. T here has been limited \nuse of data in evaluating the im pact of the comprehensive school \nimprovement plan on classroom in structional practice and student \nperformance.\n9.6d There is evidence of attempts to sustain the commitment to continuous \nPage 54 of 74 Standard 9 Comprehensive and Effective PlanningSummary Findings in: EfficiencyStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\n2 Performance Rating\nimprovement.\nSchool leadership has a goal fo r continuous improvement in student \nperformance, but this g oal and commitment has no t been conveyed to all \nstakeholder groups. School leadership is no t consistently monitoring progress \nand holding the staff accountable for achieving the goals of the \ncomprehensive school improvement plan.\nPage 55 of 74 Stuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nSummary of recommendations in: Efficiency\nComprehensive and Effective Planning\nSchool leadership should incl ude representatives from all stakeholder groups in the \nschool community to lead a consensus buil ding process to defi ne the school’s core \nset of beliefs and develop a shared vi sion. The vision and beliefs should be \ncomprehensive and address key issues relati ve to effective decision making, policy \ndevelopment and improvement of teachi ng practices and student learning.\nSchool leadership should co mmunicate to staff and all stakeholders the importance \nof the compr ehensive school improvement plan and how implementation of all action \ncomponents will impact student learning. \nWith a sense of urgency, all stakeholders should accept their role and responsibility \nin the implementation of the comprehensiv e school improvement plan. All staff \nshould be held accountable for the academic success or failure of all students.\nSchool leadership should immediately coll aborate with stakeholders to revise the \ncomprehensive school improvement plan for the purpose of identifying the \nachievement gap populations. The revised plan should include specific researched \nbase strategies that will yield results to eliminated achievement gaps in the student \npopulation.Standard 9\nResources:\nDuFour, R. & Eaker, R.E. (1998). Professional Learning Communities At Work, Best \nPractices for Enhancing Student Achievement. Bloomington, IN: National Educational \nService. \nHenderson, A. T. & Mapp, K. L. (2002). A New Wave of Evidence: The Impact of School, \nFamily and Community Connections on Student Achievement. Austin, TX: Southwest \nEducational Development Laboratory.\nKaufman, R. A. & English, F. Mapping Educational Success Strategic Planning for School \nAdministrators. \nKentucky Association of School Councils - http://www.kasc.net/ \nLambert, L. (1998). Building Leadership Capacity in Schools. Alexandria, VA: Association for \nSupervision and Curriculum Development. \nPage 56 of 74 Summary of Next Steps:Stuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nSchool leadership should establish a procedure for monitoring classroom management to ensure that \nall teachers are implementing the adopted Conversation Help Activity Movement Participation \nprogram. Inconsistencies in teacher expectations of student behavior should be addressed. School \nleadership should hold all staff accountable for demonstrating high behavior and academic \nexpectations for all students.\nSchool leadership should monitor the delivery of instruction to ensure teachers use varied student-\ncentered instructional strategies that require higher-order thinking and problem-solving skills. These \nstrategies should result in daily lessons that are relevant, motivating and focused on meeting the \nneeds of a diverse student population. School leadership should ensure that instruction is rigorous, \nchallenging and delivers the aligned curriculum with the goal of all students reaching proficiency.\nSchool council should continue the initiative to review, revise, develop, adopt and implement all \nrequired policies and by-laws that govern the decision-making efforts of the council. These policies and \nby-laws should be titled, sequentially numbered and dated upon adoption, review or revision. All \npolicies and by-laws should be used by the council to drive instructional and operational decisions that \nwill chart the direction of the school.\nSchool leadership should establish a procedure for monitoring the connectivity of teacher evaluations, \nprofessional growth plans, and professional development to facilitate continuous improvement that \ntargets the needs of students as identified in and implemented through the comprehensive school \nimprovement plan.\nSchool leadership should collaborate with representatives of all stakeholder groups to review and \nrevise the mission statement to specifically address the school’s purpose. The mission statement \nshould be accompanied by a carefully crafted vision and thoughtful belief statements that move the \nschool toward proficiency, and is effectively communicated to the school community.\nSchool leadership should immediately, fully implement the comprehensive school improvement plan \nand monitor its impact on instructional practices and student performance. Data collected from the \nmonitoring process should be used to review and modify the comprehensive school improvement plan \nin a timely manner.\nPage 57 of 74 In Conclusion:Stuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nWe charge school leadership and the school staff to urgently review this report and begin the process \nof leading their school to actions that will impact student and staff performance. We encourage the \nschool community to view this report in depth, asking deep reflective questions about each finding and \nthe recommendations for action that focus on the following:\nWill Stuart Middle School put in place systematic procedures to monitor teaching and learning that \nproduce results and address achievement gaps?\nWhat would Stuart Middle School look like if all staff possessed the management tools and strategies \nnecessary to provide a safe, supportive and nurturing environment where teaching and learning takes \nplace?\n \nWhat is my role and specific responsibility for student performance?\nHow can we build on staff strengths and collegiality to create a common approach to productive \nstudent work, higher-order thinking skills and instruction beyond textbook-driven teaching and learning?\nIs data, including continuous student assessment data, consistently and intentionally used to inform \ninstruction, track student learning progress, and assess the impact of teaching strategies on student \nperformance?\n \nHow will Stuart Middle School leadership support new staff in ways that result in recruiting and \nretaining competent teachers? \nIn closing, the scholastic audit team agrees with the school’s classification as an assistance level 2 \nschool under the state’s assessment and accountability system.\nTEAM MEMBERS:\nPage 58 of 74 Academic Performance 1.1 CurriculumStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nCurriculum is aligned. Acad emic Expectat ions, Core \nContent for Assessment, Transformations1.1a\nDistrict initiates, facilitates discussions among schools \nregarding curriculum standards1.1b\nDistrict initiates, facilitates discussions to eliminate \nunnecessary overlaps1.1c\nEvidence of vertical communi cation, intentional focus on \nkey curriculum transition points1.1d\nSchool curriculum provides specific links to continuing education 1.1e\nSystematic process for monitoring, evaluating and reviewing curriculum 1.1f\nCurriculum provides access to a common academic core 1.1g\n1234 0\nPerformance Rating\nPage 59 of 74 Academic Performance 2.1 Classroom Evaluation/AssessmentStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nClassroom assessments frequent, rigorous, aligned with \nKentucky's core content2.1a\nTeachers collaborate in the design of authentic assessment 2.1b\nStudents can articulate what is required to be proficient 2.1c\nTest scores are used to identify curriculum gaps 2.1d\nAssessments designed to provide feedback on student \nlearning for instructional purposes2.1e\nPerformance standards communicated, evident in classrooms, observable in student work 2.1f\nAssessment and Accountability Program is c oordinated by \nschool and district leadership2.1g\nSamples of student work are analyzed 2.1h\n1234 0\nPerformance Rating\nPage 60 of 74 Academic Performance 3.1 InstructionStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nEvidence that effective and varied instructional strategies \nare used in all classrooms3.1a\nInstructional strategies and learning activities are aligned 3.1b\nInstructional strategies/act ivities are consistently \nmonitored...diverse student population3.1c\nTeachers demonstrate content knowledge 3.1d\nEvidence teachers incorporate the use of technology 3.1e\nInstructional resources are sufficient to deliver the curriculum 3.1f\nTeachers examine and discuss student work 3.1g\nHomework is frequent and moni tored, tied to instructional \npractice3.1h\n1234 0\nPerformance Rating\nPage 61 of 74 Learning Environment 4.1 School CultureStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nLeadership support for a safe, orderly and equitable \nlearning environment4.1a\nLeadership creates experiences that all children can learn 4.1b\nTeachers hold high expectations for all students 4.1c\nTeachers, staff involved in decision-making processes \nregarding teaching and learning4.1d\nTeachers accept their role in student success 4.1e\nSchool assigns staff...opportunities for ALL students 4.1f\nTeachers communicate regularly with families 4.1g\nEvidence that the teachers and staff care 4.1h\nMultiple communication stra tegies...to all stakeholders 4.1i\nEvidence that student achievement is highly valued 4.1j\nThe school/district provides support...needs of all students 4.1k\n1234 0\nPerformance Rating\nPage 62 of 74 Learning Environment 5.1 Student, Family and Community SupportStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nFamilies and the community are active partners 5.1a\nAll students have access to all the curriculum 5.1b\nReduce barriers to learning 5.1c\nStudents are provided opportunities to receive additional \nassistance5.1d\nSchool maintains an accurate student record system 5.1e\n1234 0\nPerformance Rating\nPage 63 of 74 Learning Environment 6.1 Professional DevelopmentStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nSupport for the long-term professional growth of the \nindividual staff members6.1a\nThe school has an intentional plan for building \ninstructional capacity6.1b\nStaff development priorities..alignment..goals for student performance 6.1c\nPlans for school improvement directly connect goals for student learning 6.1d\nProfessional development is on-going and job-embedded 6.1e\nProfessional development planning connect student achievement data 6.1f\n1234 0\nPerformance Rating\nPage 64 of 74 Learning Environment 6.2 Professional Growth and EvaluationStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nClearly defined evaluation process 6.2a\nLeadership provides the fiscal resources for the \nappropriate professional growth6.2b\nEmployee evaluation and the individual professional growth plan to improve staff proficiency 6.2c\nA process of personnel evaluation which meets or exceeds standards set in statute 6.2d\nThe school/district improvemen t plan identifies specific \ninstructional le adership needs6.2e\nEvaluation process to provide teachers..change behavior \nand instructional practice6.2f\n1234 0\nPerformance Rating\nPage 65 of 74 Efficiency 7.1 LeadershipStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nLeadership has developed and sustained a shared vision 7.1a\nLeadership decisions focused on student academic data 7.1b\nAll administrators have a growth plan 7.1c\nEvidence that the leadership team disaggregates data 7.1d\nLeadership ensures all instructional staff...access to \ncurriculum related materials7.1e\nLeadership ensures that time is protected...instructional \nissues7.1f\nLeadership plans and allocates resources 7.1g\nSchool/district leadership provides policy and resource infrastructure 7.1h\nProcess for the development and the implementation of council policy 7.1i\nSBDM council has an intentional focus on student academic performance 7.1j\nPrincipal demonstrates leader ship skills in academic \nperformance, learning environment, efficiency7.1k\n1234 0\nPerformance Rating\nPage 66 of 74 Efficiency 8.1 Organization of the SchoolStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nSchool is organized...use of all available resources 8.1a\nAll students have access to all the curriculum 8.1b\nStaff are allocated based upon the learning needs of all \nstudents8.1c\nStaff makes efficient use of instructional time 8.1d\nStaff...planning vertically and horizontally across content areas 8.1e\nSchedule aligned with the school's mission 8.1f\n1234 0\nPerformance Rating\nPage 67 of 74 Efficiency 8.2 Resource Allocation and IntegrationStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nClearly defined process (in accordance with the school \ncouncil allocation formula)8.2a\nBudget reflects decisions dir ected by an assessment of \nneed8.2b\nCouncils, school boards analyze funding and other resource requests 8.2c\nResources are allocated and integrated to address student needs 8.2d\n1234 0\nPerformance Rating\nPage 68 of 74 Efficiency 9.1 Defining the School Vision, Mission, BeliefsStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nCollaborative process used to develop the vision, beliefs, \nmission9.1a\n1234 0\nPerformance Rating\nPage 69 of 74 Efficiency 9.2 Development of the ProfileStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nPlanning process involves collecting, managing and \nanalyzing data9.2a\nUse data for school improvement planning 9.2b\n1234 0\nPerformance Rating\nPage 70 of 74 Efficiency 9.3 Defining Desired Results for Student LearningStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nSchool and district plans reflect learning research, \nexpectations for student learning9.3a\nAnalyze their students' unique learning needs 9.3b\nResults for student learning are defined 9.3c\n1234 0\nPerformance Rating\nPage 71 of 74 Efficiency 9.4 Analyzing Instructional and Organizational EffectivenessStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nStrengths and limitations are identified 9.4a\nGoals for building, strengthening capacity 9.4b\n1234 0\nPerformance Rating\nPage 72 of 74 Efficiency 9.5 Development of the Improvement PlanStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nSteps for school improvement aligned with improvement \ngoals9.5a\nPlan identifies resources, timelines 9.5b\nEvaluating the effectiveness of improvement plan 9.5c\nImprovement plan is aligned with the school's profile, \nbeliefs, mission, desired results9.5d\n1234 0\nPerformance Rating\nPage 73 of 74 Efficiency 9.6 Implementation and DocumentationStuart Middle School\n10/26/2008 - 10/31/2008Jefferson County School DistrictKentucky Departme nt of Education\nScholastic Review Summary Report\nPlan is implemented as developed 9.6a\nSchool evaluates the degree to which it achieves the goals \nand objectives for student learning9.6b\nThe school evaluates the degree to which it achieves the expected impact 9.6c\nEvidence of attempts to sustain the commitment to \ncontinuous improvement9.6d\n1234 0\nPerformance Rating\nPage 74 of 74"
} |
[
-0.07055656611919403,
0.0603652223944664,
0.038303617388010025,
-0.08266878128051758,
-0.1111234575510025,
0.021150141954421997,
-0.003551322501152754,
-0.05981268733739853,
0.07035308331251144,
-0.07541631907224655,
-0.05176817998290062,
-0.021319406107068062,
0.0072921644896268845,
-0.0012579511385411024,
0.01526639610528946,
-0.011077716946601868,
-0.038584187626838684,
0.022111738100647926,
-0.08011304587125778,
-0.04826755076646805,
-0.04507321119308472,
-0.050160638988018036,
0.04144066572189331,
0.05440882593393326,
0.011074417270720005,
-0.006468959152698517,
-0.011129221878945827,
-0.004408020060509443,
0.017813794314861298,
0.0013637017691507936,
0.04025154560804367,
-0.05122925341129303,
-0.031268343329429626,
-0.01827196590602398,
-0.0037864644546061754,
0.046123553067445755,
0.07180618494749069,
0.004225069656968117,
0.07560129463672638,
0.008669017814099789,
0.12750327587127686,
-0.03908389434218407,
-0.023802375420928,
-0.03521354869008064,
0.024580905213952065,
-0.02229662612080574,
0.05688956007361412,
-0.016419338062405586,
-0.04022597521543503,
-0.0619906410574913,
0.0354432575404644,
0.0026478043291717768,
0.091512031853199,
-0.0750279575586319,
-0.022054089233279228,
-0.024441903457045555,
0.056272946298122406,
-0.08128983527421951,
0.005058529786765575,
-0.02137530967593193,
-0.034280888736248016,
0.000852474884595722,
-0.010271226055920124,
0.043677523732185364,
-0.08881446719169617,
-0.09058491140604019,
0.051132768392562866,
0.026398247107863426,
0.0026439272332936525,
-0.021838417276740074,
0.03658035025000572,
0.023074135184288025,
0.022090671584010124,
-0.0030311662703752518,
-0.042260415852069855,
-0.07505720853805542,
0.06246628984808922,
0.011491792276501656,
0.029901111498475075,
-0.08840586990118027,
0.14508669078350067,
-0.028951244428753853,
-0.004741267301142216,
-0.0431768000125885,
0.055180516093969345,
-0.05922923609614372,
0.03026200644671917,
0.005232331342995167,
0.006302985828369856,
0.01768832467496395,
0.01379277091473341,
0.06977918744087219,
0.06759888678789139,
-0.017800241708755493,
0.13417309522628784,
0.05905534699559212,
-0.029655326157808304,
-0.08053424209356308,
-0.08562251925468445,
0.10077054798603058,
0.020325081422924995,
0.014061163179576397,
0.02443700283765793,
-0.023682361468672752,
-0.015011670999228954,
0.009270859882235527,
-0.06542082875967026,
0.059954460710287094,
-0.026924358680844307,
-0.010417036712169647,
-0.04520266130566597,
-0.05673901364207268,
-0.02167237550020218,
-0.053433772176504135,
0.011579738929867744,
0.050376467406749725,
-0.017666013911366463,
0.03909800201654434,
-0.02649521827697754,
0.008657180704176426,
-0.06754890829324722,
-0.014741030521690845,
-0.027263706550002098,
0.10051226615905762,
-0.0006871906225569546,
-0.00809218268841505,
-0.08045962452888489,
2.4496751258159524e-33,
0.03756478801369667,
-0.003903627395629883,
-0.04635939747095108,
0.0006262645474635065,
-0.05735325440764427,
0.0773477554321289,
-0.008936146274209023,
-0.021041229367256165,
-0.0576322004199028,
-0.028418244794011116,
0.0059935785830020905,
0.010858738794922829,
-0.01634840853512287,
0.0265942569822073,
-0.07832186669111252,
-0.0029573694337159395,
0.0066923280246555805,
-0.020607363432645798,
0.002848309464752674,
-0.10750962793827057,
0.04480268806219101,
-0.052278224378824234,
-0.021322032436728477,
0.06693611294031143,
0.04301811009645462,
-0.06909669935703278,
0.0035956762731075287,
-0.05734320357441902,
0.024091267958283424,
0.07160716503858566,
-0.11489860713481903,
0.0511271171271801,
0.03938176855444908,
-0.006730890367180109,
0.05892682448029518,
0.02562924474477768,
-0.06419834494590759,
-0.023194439709186554,
0.011029299348592758,
-0.03209678828716278,
0.025930657982826233,
0.05178074166178703,
0.06329230964183807,
0.030131520703434944,
0.020864157006144524,
-0.008367510512471199,
0.05791708081960678,
-0.06031755730509758,
0.014435558579862118,
0.011985777877271175,
0.034307755529880524,
0.039669591933488846,
-0.020040379837155342,
-0.08386898040771484,
-0.030909305438399315,
-0.07764437049627304,
-0.06591467559337616,
0.08519648760557175,
0.03729914501309395,
-0.03366110473871231,
-0.0470200814306736,
0.060154955834150314,
-0.09419199079275131,
0.04234408214688301,
0.011984724551439285,
-0.0666951909661293,
-0.06054510176181793,
0.08688027411699295,
-0.10462769120931625,
0.05771727114915848,
-0.012969684787094593,
-0.005556089803576469,
-0.023941801860928535,
-0.022529125213623047,
-0.0756102129817009,
-0.04277738928794861,
0.034777846187353134,
0.006140452343970537,
0.001515137031674385,
0.016231320798397064,
0.018779899924993515,
0.05669088289141655,
0.06892666220664978,
-0.004707009065896273,
-0.027455057948827744,
0.04496005177497864,
0.14606007933616638,
-0.0012703901156783104,
0.025949327275156975,
-0.04639316350221634,
0.06813934445381165,
0.12260676920413971,
0.08354033529758453,
-0.02049587294459343,
-0.10700704157352448,
-4.063863233681148e-33,
-0.02142159827053547,
0.034363213926553726,
-0.021043211221694946,
-0.02017408236861229,
-0.030705977231264114,
-0.026360897347331047,
0.030072864145040512,
0.10452277213335037,
0.06879010796546936,
-0.031306855380535126,
0.01583338901400566,
0.013100601732730865,
0.04682629182934761,
-0.04125822335481644,
-0.0074136629700660706,
-0.01775600202381611,
-0.07132742553949356,
-0.012169528752565384,
-0.05637447535991669,
0.032565608620643616,
0.02669546753168106,
0.03604341670870781,
-0.05508222058415413,
0.07068502902984619,
0.001284328754991293,
-0.01688028685748577,
-0.011760029010474682,
0.01214599795639515,
0.013345540501177311,
-0.04754938557744026,
0.0026960221584886312,
0.0046999286860227585,
-0.13121314346790314,
0.013698791153728962,
0.0190082136541605,
-0.0021106796339154243,
-0.007596862968057394,
0.048908084630966187,
-0.045833051204681396,
0.011041015386581421,
0.015003902837634087,
0.050497960299253464,
0.017367329448461533,
0.06043725460767746,
-0.02253740280866623,
0.08644229173660278,
0.10441740602254868,
0.019930314272642136,
-0.053403373807668686,
-0.017751866951584816,
-0.14421290159225464,
-0.05788186937570572,
0.014807234518229961,
0.0637388825416565,
0.0685720294713974,
-0.010446568951010704,
-0.08837071061134338,
0.018542401492595673,
-0.09243111312389374,
-0.01531909592449665,
-0.03777855634689331,
0.0033097367268055677,
0.05996771901845932,
-0.007658097427338362,
0.049390461295843124,
-0.016425959765911102,
-0.021813269704580307,
0.013814524747431278,
0.012217966839671135,
0.09157244116067886,
0.03267475962638855,
0.004848418291658163,
-0.10799823701381683,
-0.10804746299982071,
0.07973191887140274,
0.09096658229827881,
-0.08263688534498215,
-0.04649745300412178,
-0.026885559782385826,
0.01567644439637661,
0.10990340262651443,
-0.016728894785046577,
-0.14987389743328094,
-0.0348547101020813,
0.08472081273794174,
-0.07166388630867004,
0.02480120211839676,
0.03599473461508751,
0.08355090767145157,
0.008679737336933613,
-0.05060920864343643,
-0.06767857074737549,
0.07069414854049683,
-0.05809995159506798,
0.055807486176490784,
-5.686742099442199e-8,
0.0314364954829216,
-0.003407843643799424,
-0.04042050987482071,
0.03779381886124611,
0.004553941544145346,
0.03615560010075569,
-0.053080782294273376,
-0.09226902574300766,
-0.0348239503800869,
0.007894028909504414,
0.043193940073251724,
-0.013442330993711948,
-0.022777242586016655,
-0.001855630544014275,
-0.054290302097797394,
0.041310910135507584,
0.0019259226974099874,
-0.03348786011338234,
0.022079868242144585,
-0.030936406925320625,
-0.0029890709556639194,
0.02232089452445507,
0.05543145909905434,
0.030230937525629997,
-0.0026608542539179325,
-0.03564498946070671,
-0.029026368632912636,
-0.017159057781100273,
-0.03262199088931084,
0.04656105116009712,
0.03289565071463585,
-0.040203873068094254,
-0.0918663889169693,
0.0156359001994133,
-0.018908044323325157,
0.08401650935411453,
-0.12014193087816238,
0.04526408761739731,
0.030823839828372,
0.034977834671735764,
0.07498201727867126,
-0.002636222867295146,
0.020392490550875664,
0.014977614395320415,
-0.00595834432169795,
-0.060014113783836365,
0.021722102537751198,
0.008092124946415424,
0.037858035415410995,
0.03515835106372833,
-0.001085505005903542,
0.02305435575544834,
0.05199579522013664,
0.058941904455423355,
0.07932122051715851,
-0.029040172696113586,
-0.04126017540693283,
0.0317358635365963,
0.021748868748545647,
0.006583559326827526,
0.017366619780659676,
-0.08834018558263779,
-0.035676565021276474,
-0.037745922803878784
] | {
"pdf_file": "O4OJHSZUX6K2VVH4VJPOFC7CMUOO5UX5.pdf",
"text": "Gus Promotes Religious Freedom Worldwide\nOn Thursday, Gus addressed a forum to highlight the treatment of Coptic Christians in Egypt,\nand promote religious freedom in the Middle East and worldwide.\n \nAs a Greek Orthodox Christian, Gus has made it a feature of his service in Congress to be a\nvoice for all religious minorities wherever they may be persecuted in the world. He led an effort\nin 2011 to prevent the Egyptian military from using U.S. taxpayer dollars to persecute and attack\nthousands of Coptic Christians and other religious minorities.\n \nWatch Gus' speech here:\n \n \nRemarks as prepared for delivery:\n \nGood morning and thank you for allowing me to speak. Before I begin, I want to take a moment\nto remember His Holiness Pope Shenouda. He was instrumental in the search for mutual\nunderstanding among the world's religions. I express my deepest condolences for your loss and\npray that a worthy successor will arise – a successor who will protect the oldest Christians in the\nMiddle East and prevent the persecution of religious minorities.\n \nAs you know I have worked to condemn violations of religious freedom throughout the world. As\na member of the Subcommittee on the Middle East and the International Religious Freedom\nCaucus, I am alarmed especially at the dwindling number of Christians in the Middle East. A\ngood friend of mine, Caroline Glick, wrote in the Jerusalem Post a column on this very issue.\nShe noted that in Turkey, the Christian population has dwindled from 2 million at the end of\nWorld War I to less than 100,000 today.\n \nAnd, there are only about 1,200 Greek Orthodox Christians left in Constantinople – a place that\nrefuses to recognize the Ecumenical nature of our Patriarch Bartholomew. Additionally the\nTheological School at Halki – a seminary to train Orthodox clergy - has been shut down for over\n 1 / 3 Gus Promotes Religious Freedom Worldwide\n40 years. This is unacceptable behavior by the Turkish government.\n \nIn Iraq a decade ago there were 800,000 Christians - today there are 150,000. In Iran prior to\nthe Islamic revolution, Iran's Christians were more or less free to practice their religion - today\nthey are executed. In Syria, four decades ago, Christians made up nearly half of the population.\n \nToday 4% of Syrians are Christian and they are suffering currently during tragic times over\nthere. Please include them in your prayers. In Jordan, half a century ago, 18% of the population\nwas Christian. Today 2% of Jordanians are Christian. And, of course, we all know of the horrible\nmassacre and persecution of Egyptian Copts. I am sure you have seen it time again, just like I\nhave, the massacre of Christians in Tahrir Square and Maspero, as well as during holy events\nsuch as Christmas Eve mass.\n \nThat is why organizations like Coptic Solidarity are so important to remind the world that as we\nspeak here today, Christians in the Middle East are dying or being displaced. We must hold\nMiddle Eastern governments accountable. The right to worship must be protected in the Middle\nEast, starting with Egypt, in order for a free and democratic society to flourish.\n \nAnd Egypt must know that the United States strongly supports the safety of religious minorities.\nLast year I called for conditions to be placed on the $1.3 billion in annual aid that we provide\nEgypt. This money has been used by the Egyptian military to persecute and attack Coptic\nChristians and other religious minorities and this is unacceptable. I will continue to call for these\nconditions as long as the rights of minorities in Egypt are ignored. Egypt's new president and\nnew parliament must understand that the US is watching their actions and we will not turn a\nblind eye to the persecution of religious minorities. We will also be watching as the Constitution\nis written. I have expressed my support in the past for the proposed Bill of Rights that would\ncement the rights of religious minorities in Egypt and I express it here again today. And I\npromise that I will remain vigilant to the plight of the Coptic Christians as Egypt continues its\ntransition.\n \nMoving forward, we must continue to work together to support the freedom of religion and\nexpression for all of Egypt. As I am sure you know, the spokesman to the newly elected\nEgyptian president said that President Morsi would appoint a woman and a Coptic Christian to\nbe his co-vice presidents, a first in Egyptian history. Whether this will take place is yet to be\nseen, but it does remind us that we must never lose hope that one day Coptic Christians will\nenjoy equal citizenship in their native country of Egypt.\n 2 / 3 Gus Promotes Religious Freedom Worldwide\n \n 3 / 3"
} |
[
0.041884277015924454,
-0.02034231647849083,
0.03622492030262947,
0.008292223326861858,
-0.01703176088631153,
0.019298313185572624,
-0.047831278294324875,
0.022215325385332108,
-0.09501765668392181,
0.008855236694216728,
-0.02480720356106758,
0.027349960058927536,
-0.08047855645418167,
-0.04884961247444153,
0.004839510191231966,
0.05790265277028084,
0.08482174575328827,
0.02627502754330635,
-0.033129479736089706,
0.04654660075902939,
0.03311554715037346,
0.07788874953985214,
0.01927659660577774,
-0.08435913175344467,
0.043578632175922394,
-0.014303685165941715,
-0.017430715262889862,
0.0396113395690918,
-0.03159576281905174,
0.049745019525289536,
0.08333569020032883,
-0.011535785160958767,
-0.016244027763605118,
0.036318592727184296,
0.09559302777051926,
0.037727002054452896,
-0.010949862189590931,
0.04006177559494972,
-0.010292059741914272,
-0.005791657138615847,
0.03533148765563965,
-0.03893055394291878,
-0.017276423051953316,
-0.005815007723867893,
-0.04931589588522911,
0.029913729056715965,
0.0017029296141117811,
0.023189909756183624,
-0.017557594925165176,
-0.020272135734558105,
0.03926977515220642,
0.06379775702953339,
0.014217941090464592,
0.007652765139937401,
-0.021908020600676537,
0.02114715985953808,
-0.009914064779877663,
-0.026406534016132355,
0.03789149597287178,
-0.07014800608158112,
0.0755881816148758,
0.08075665682554245,
-0.07179564237594604,
0.02643870748579502,
0.09818235039710999,
-0.01243831031024456,
0.06113021820783615,
-0.018624484539031982,
-0.010617045685648918,
-0.08105196803808212,
0.04107731208205223,
-0.033051274716854095,
0.04339371994137764,
0.0007950316066853702,
0.04764171689748764,
0.042926665395498276,
0.05142851546406746,
0.02219931036233902,
0.10352706164121628,
-0.09627532213926315,
0.08044757694005966,
0.06874555349349976,
0.0041563622653484344,
0.027888577431440353,
-0.04017508029937744,
0.04536613076925278,
-0.025729306042194366,
0.0286115575581789,
0.0658794417977333,
-0.009935969486832619,
0.06560096889734268,
-0.025899160653352737,
0.0493277832865715,
-0.02257859706878662,
0.0017455117776989937,
-0.009782555513083935,
0.0016650614561513066,
-0.10848501324653625,
-0.027343489229679108,
0.07500042021274567,
-0.04567160829901695,
-0.023205867037177086,
-0.02263162098824978,
-0.02703702822327614,
-0.013185964897274971,
-0.038821037858724594,
0.09261921048164368,
0.10949878394603729,
-0.09202397614717484,
0.03679988905787468,
0.004873352125287056,
-0.0018940347945317626,
-0.025530844926834106,
-0.04309172183275223,
0.021888330578804016,
-0.00785279180854559,
-0.006216499488800764,
-0.02517981082201004,
0.052716705948114395,
-0.1198396384716034,
0.013712882995605469,
-0.02061939612030983,
-0.02206757850944996,
-0.1016298159956932,
0.03718062862753868,
-0.01975247822701931,
-0.030504008755087852,
6.621697798768167e-33,
-0.019622787833213806,
0.05320008844137192,
0.02872154489159584,
-0.05457790195941925,
-0.014768154360353947,
-0.03018740378320217,
0.016402795910835266,
-0.011093636974692345,
-0.005646709352731705,
0.0789605975151062,
0.04381507262587547,
-0.032254625111818314,
-0.011972344480454922,
-0.014656174927949905,
-0.025205887854099274,
0.025126297026872635,
0.017903544008731842,
0.005533408839255571,
-0.022793099284172058,
-0.0005380031070671976,
0.030408872291445732,
-0.004536591004580259,
0.007865877822041512,
0.04528433457016945,
-0.017886539921164513,
-0.08776409924030304,
-0.03212390094995499,
0.012342583388090134,
0.024558642879128456,
0.007818197831511497,
0.054431311786174774,
0.08596937358379364,
0.011015387251973152,
-0.06419113278388977,
-0.08697517216205597,
0.03561977669596672,
-0.07967375963926315,
-0.03689644858241081,
-0.039794307202100754,
-0.08001608401536942,
-0.002464694669470191,
0.0972898006439209,
0.022830387577414513,
0.019580353051424026,
0.08453858643770218,
-0.010667672380805016,
-0.022675251588225365,
-0.018117694184184074,
-0.08689083158969879,
0.06226460263133049,
0.005428491160273552,
0.027085455134510994,
-0.12959447503089905,
-0.014812090434134007,
-0.07059274613857269,
-0.04105058312416077,
0.03541656956076622,
-0.06955710053443909,
-0.009268227964639664,
-0.027285398915410042,
-0.016434475779533386,
-0.07520841062068939,
-0.06033425033092499,
-0.0940888524055481,
-0.08781375735998154,
-0.07691436260938644,
0.045282430946826935,
-0.011351950466632843,
0.01143574994057417,
0.019642310217022896,
-0.017394738271832466,
0.06168427690863609,
0.010503898374736309,
-0.05688796937465668,
0.013730967417359352,
-0.04387623816728592,
-0.002625382738187909,
-0.0008943834691308439,
0.04760793223977089,
0.009913352318108082,
0.0722246766090393,
-0.03484363108873367,
-0.02340102009475231,
0.038319431245326996,
0.14315684139728546,
-0.037463217973709106,
-0.07266373932361603,
0.02790098823606968,
-0.042938679456710815,
-0.02210456319153309,
0.08238419890403748,
0.022919395938515663,
-0.013445901684463024,
-0.0033408317249268293,
-0.006683791987597942,
-6.337774036058337e-33,
-0.10686223208904266,
0.008745557628571987,
-0.12915094196796417,
-0.026421671733260155,
-0.017111608758568764,
0.03944024071097374,
-0.06399592012166977,
-0.12948709726333618,
-0.004148156847804785,
-0.0959751233458519,
-0.04184872657060623,
0.01232978142797947,
0.0704110637307167,
0.040258169174194336,
-0.06683801859617233,
-0.008641103282570839,
-0.011691270396113396,
-0.021726559847593307,
0.057864438742399216,
-0.010229839943349361,
0.025621673092246056,
0.05850261449813843,
-0.007925698533654213,
0.02021116204559803,
0.022021817043423653,
-0.02962992899119854,
-0.04066111519932747,
0.09973540902137756,
0.01671401597559452,
0.001990365097299218,
0.00964201707392931,
-0.04320033639669418,
-0.06663212925195694,
0.03718255087733269,
-0.021252481266856194,
-0.014552811160683632,
0.024006826803088188,
-0.06591817736625671,
-0.09589552134275436,
0.007443677634000778,
0.10562222450971603,
0.02615261636674404,
-0.04992314800620079,
-0.05820201337337494,
-0.02364618331193924,
0.0964304730296135,
0.05178021267056465,
0.04105113074183464,
0.0493343248963356,
0.0587301142513752,
0.0432988703250885,
0.0364144966006279,
-0.0265754796564579,
0.0707302913069725,
0.014094388112425804,
0.13461096584796906,
0.14709573984146118,
0.023293884471058846,
0.026999808847904205,
0.056305013597011566,
-0.03251824527978897,
0.13137546181678772,
0.012155795469880104,
0.03318401798605919,
0.06719271838665009,
-0.02672743983566761,
-0.019073350355029106,
-0.07404998689889908,
-0.03889630362391472,
-0.07837899029254913,
-0.07980222254991531,
-0.07165586203336716,
-0.011375580914318562,
-0.11182055622339249,
-0.07679694890975952,
-0.005982107948511839,
0.03458581864833832,
-0.05541637912392616,
-0.06892634928226471,
0.018428273499011993,
-0.010521812364459038,
0.003551164409145713,
0.006693813018500805,
0.06783679872751236,
0.02047140896320343,
-0.01780390553176403,
-0.021397501230239868,
-0.08528168499469757,
0.009156541898846626,
0.14948053658008575,
-0.05368228629231453,
-0.034436989575624466,
0.04483012855052948,
0.030572419986128807,
-0.041331902146339417,
-5.439511596705415e-8,
0.02011791244149208,
0.058666933327913284,
-0.05546131357550621,
-0.029069408774375916,
0.02577301487326622,
0.02864219807088375,
-0.0063695404678583145,
0.04684634879231453,
0.01451172772794962,
-0.01244817953556776,
0.09473993629217148,
0.06400974094867706,
-0.051439929753541946,
0.015737757086753845,
-0.005748093128204346,
-0.05143367499113083,
0.0812048688530922,
-0.005766510032117367,
-0.07173260301351547,
-0.023520801216363907,
-0.026156887412071228,
-0.05936036258935928,
-0.03200182318687439,
0.08187825232744217,
-0.02431526780128479,
-0.06551452726125717,
-0.02272827923297882,
0.037876419723033905,
0.0319494865834713,
-0.0454118512570858,
-0.022556550800800323,
0.06686404347419739,
0.09073054790496826,
0.014332051388919353,
-0.027926646173000336,
0.04269703850150108,
-0.0485200434923172,
0.019252292811870575,
0.0517943911254406,
0.008494751527905464,
0.024795016273856163,
-0.0027116709388792515,
-0.024765564128756523,
0.011915141716599464,
0.030551204457879066,
0.021947674453258514,
0.0031054054852575064,
-0.10265685617923737,
0.044444773346185684,
-0.134154811501503,
-0.09312852472066879,
-0.05818607658147812,
-0.0017344197258353233,
0.04168865829706192,
-0.01412314735352993,
-0.007314382586628199,
-0.018757322803139687,
0.02153806760907173,
0.08379434794187546,
0.017359882593154907,
-0.01953200064599514,
-0.019580332562327385,
-0.05653515085577965,
0.03619309887290001
] | {
"pdf_file": "IX44BHQ54BCVRSA6XB3KC2WWUCYZINYZ.pdf",
"text": " \n \n \nFor Immediate Release Contact: Hollie S. Cammarasana \nMay 11, 2010 Public Relations Director, DHCD \n (804) 371-7006, (804) 519-3540 cell \n hollie.cammarasana@dhcd.virginia.gov \n \n- Virginia’s NSP Turning Fo reclosed Homes into \nHomeowner Opportunities - \nInterested homebuyers may receive closing cost and other assistance \n \nRichmond, VA – Virginia’s Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) is turning vacant, foreclosed \nand potentially blighting homes into homeownership opportunities for Virginia’s low, moderate and middle income families. \n \n“The NSP has provided an opportunity for communities to address the impacts of foreclosure, to stabilize home prices, and prevent homes from becoming sources of blight,” said DHCD Director Bill \nShelton. “However the program is also focus ed on making these homes available for low, moderate \nand middle income families.” \nArea homebuyers earning up to 120 percent of the area median income are encouraged to find out if \nthey are eligible. Eligible homebuyers may receive closing cost and other assistance to help make the homes affordable. NSP funds must be used by September 17, 2010, and prospective homebuyers are \nurged to contact NSP grantees to find out more. Many grantees are now concentrating on identifying and qualifying eligible homebuyers in those areas of Virginia served by the NSP. \n \nNSP grantees are providing assistance in the following areas of the Commonwealth: \n Northern Virginia : Alexandria, Loudoun, Fauquier, Fairfax, Stafford, Prince William, Manassas, \nFredericksburg, Caroline, Spotsylvania, Culpeper, Orange \n Central Virginia : Richmond City, Chesterfield, Louisa, Lynchburg, Petersburg \n Tidewater/Hampton Roads : Newport News, Hampton, Norfolk, Chesapeake, Suffolk, \nPortsmouth, Virginia Beach \n Northern Shenandoah : Warren, Frederick, Shenandoah, Winchester \n Southside : Franklin County, Danville \n Southwest : Bristol \n \nThrough the NSP, 22 local government and nonprofit organizations have been working to acquire \nforeclosed properties at a discounted rate, rehabilitate them and make them available for resale to \nqualified homebuyers earning up to 120 percent of the area median income. \nThe NSP was authorized under the Ho using and Economic Recovery Act (HERA) of 2008 to provide \nemergency assistance to state and local governments in acquiring and redeveloping vacant and foreclosed \nproperties that might otherwise become sources of abandonment and bli ght within their communities. \n- more - \n \nThe Virginia Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) is administering Virginia’s \nNSP, and has received $38.7 million in funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban \nDevelopment for this program. Grant funds have been allocated through DHCD to local governments and \ncertified nonprofits, which are negotia ting the purchase of homes. All properties must be acquired at a \nminimum of one percent below as-is appraised value. \nTo-date, approximately 70 homes have been purchased by grantees thr ough the program, with many more \nto follow. More information about this program can be obtained by contacting the Virginia NSP \nadministrator in your area of interest. \nGrantee and Service Area Contact Email Phone \nCatholics for Housing (working in \nPrince William County) Karen DeVito cath4hsg@verizon.net (703) 330-1541 \nCentral Virginia Housing Coalition in \npartnership with Spotsylvania \n/Caroline/Fredericksburg/Stafford MaryAnne Bryant mbryant@centralvahousing.org (540) 604-9943 \nChesterfield County Robbie Campbell CampbellRo@chesterfield.gov (804) 318-8869 \nCity of Alexandria Shane Cochran Shane.Cochran@alexandriava.gov (703) 746-4990 \nCity of Chesapeake Alisa Winston awinston@cityofchesapeake.net (757) 382-6925 \nCity of Franklin Donald Goodwin dgoodwin@franklinva.com (757) 562-8580 \nCity of Hampton Angelique Shenk ashenk@hampton.gov (757) 727-6460 \nCity of Newport News David Jones djones@nnrha.org (757) 928-2646 \nCity of Norfolk Kimberly Pierce kimberley.pierce@norfolk.gov (757) 664-4796 \nCity of Portsmouth Jeff Crimer crimerj@portsmouthva.gov (757) 393-8836 \nCity of Richmond Juanita Buster Juanita.Buster@richmondgov.com (804) 646-6361 \nCity of Suffolk Robert Goumas BGoumas@city.suffolk.va.us (757) 514-4060 \nFairfax County Kehinde Powell Kehinde.Powell@fairfaxcounty.gov (703) 246-5117 \nFauquier County Cathy Zielinski cmzielinski@rrregion.org (540) 829-7450 \nLoudoun County Kelly Morocco kelly.marrocco@loudoun.gov (571) 258-3819 \nLynchburg Neighborhood \nDevelopment Foundation Laura Dupuy lauradupuy@aol.com (434) 846-6964 \nNorthern Shenandoah Valley \nRegional Commission in partnership \nwith Warren, Frederick, and Shenandoah Counties Martha Shickle shicklem@shentel.net\n (540) 636-8800 \nPathways (City of Petersburg) Mike Watts mwatts@pathways-va.org (804) 862-1015 \nPEOPLE, Incorporated Mike Rush mrush@peopleinc.net (276) 608-7407 \nTown of Culpeper Bryan Hill bhill@culpeper.to (540) 829-8268 \nVirginia Beach Community \nDevelopment Corporation Ashley Jarvis ajarvis@vbcdc.org (757) 463-9516 \nVirginia Habitat (Alexandria, \nLoudoun, Prince William, Danville, \nManassas, Petersburg, Winchester, \nFairfax, Fauquier, Louisa) Casey Landrum clandrum@habitatvirginia.org (804) 935-3083 \n \nFollow DHCD on: \n \n \n# # # \n \nEditor’s note: Interviews are available upon request. For additional story ideas and information, contact \nHollie Cammarasana at (804) 371-7006 or hollie.cammarasana@dhcd.virginia.gov . "
} |
[
-0.11883839964866638,
0.04829868674278259,
-0.0025480559561401606,
-0.011011209338903427,
0.05195074528455734,
0.010291832499206066,
0.1154332384467125,
0.0007007909007370472,
-0.08592535555362701,
-0.07065396010875702,
0.0013317164266481996,
-0.035472381860017776,
0.018434155732393265,
-0.006737178191542625,
0.024402987211942673,
-0.029503243044018745,
-0.058138374239206314,
-0.05043954402208328,
-0.020765526220202446,
0.029036032035946846,
-0.06367600709199905,
0.024029914289712906,
0.0262432973831892,
-0.006037362851202488,
-0.011076544411480427,
-0.0014006864512339234,
-0.018619801849126816,
0.03277004510164261,
0.0028860096354037523,
-0.05694391578435898,
-0.04394163936376572,
0.025414075702428818,
0.08790954202413559,
-0.02499123103916645,
-0.03668315336108208,
0.0062413448467850685,
-0.06646791845560074,
-0.0671444833278656,
0.020564241334795952,
0.04238877445459366,
0.021880215033888817,
-0.04288247600197792,
-0.03437700495123863,
0.06146686151623726,
0.0656372681260109,
-0.0785202905535698,
0.029487011954188347,
0.010798297822475433,
0.06332410126924515,
-0.04508465901017189,
-0.01823394186794758,
-0.027721041813492775,
-0.0036737609189003706,
-0.03659451752901077,
0.054250262677669525,
-0.02085655927658081,
0.015034922398626804,
-0.060095224529504776,
0.016393909230828285,
-0.03323858231306076,
0.01750349812209606,
-0.0005952207720838487,
-0.16348379850387573,
0.08492093533277512,
-0.07583844661712646,
0.0161097701638937,
0.048382941633462906,
-0.007598146330565214,
-0.024985475465655327,
0.05949747934937477,
0.0658901110291481,
-0.03513742983341217,
0.0008843158720992506,
-0.11567969620227814,
0.049390342086553574,
0.03360460326075554,
0.055154237896203995,
0.026383694261312485,
0.053694359958171844,
0.038932498544454575,
0.0004393816343508661,
0.0180604699999094,
-0.09288253635168076,
-0.004073987249284983,
-0.0008234609267674387,
-0.04883106052875519,
-0.006677441764622927,
-0.023541681468486786,
-0.03813307359814644,
0.05245159938931465,
-0.042493823915719986,
-0.055899728089571,
0.08681583404541016,
-0.04896170645952225,
-0.08339672535657883,
-0.0457635223865509,
0.029042238369584084,
0.03465776517987251,
-0.08649188280105591,
0.4062184691429138,
0.03594949096441269,
0.018697189167141914,
0.0979783833026886,
-0.007865204475820065,
0.023714108392596245,
-0.05756505951285362,
-0.06109985336661339,
-0.006620500702410936,
0.007060033269226551,
0.021669859066605568,
-0.024405108764767647,
-0.033514637500047684,
0.00025015627034008503,
0.03170765936374664,
0.04407161846756935,
0.09463243186473846,
-0.035580113530159,
-0.0045343064703047276,
0.043714847415685654,
0.00020504710846580565,
-0.002858717693015933,
-0.024884076789021492,
0.0037606365513056517,
0.014041258953511715,
0.07781578600406647,
-0.1323145031929016,
0.0068764761090278625,
-7.2201250750405e-33,
0.007334581576287746,
0.002726183971390128,
0.012147537432610989,
-0.002440247917547822,
0.027932560071349144,
0.03927065059542656,
0.003743888111785054,
-0.04643532633781433,
-0.014492551796138287,
0.05360198765993118,
0.006590632256120443,
0.03664784133434296,
-0.023135676980018616,
0.03275369852781296,
0.07811082899570465,
0.009627518244087696,
0.007964123040437698,
0.0028742437716573477,
-0.0018807238666340709,
0.004691542126238346,
-0.012402275577187538,
-0.0008041393011808395,
-0.023038707673549652,
0.04297299310564995,
-0.028259985148906708,
-0.06694644689559937,
0.038539037108421326,
-0.07085712999105453,
0.020109260454773903,
0.001460324041545391,
0.0014639950823038816,
0.049912355840206146,
-0.02594558522105217,
0.0008223677286878228,
-0.03757276013493538,
-0.028740663081407547,
0.03337514027953148,
-0.07462829351425171,
-0.035983964800834656,
0.025680823251605034,
-0.050139084458351135,
0.010837196372449398,
-0.04243791848421097,
-0.002668545348569751,
-0.004916265141218901,
0.16647927463054657,
-0.0011541391722857952,
-0.004960660357028246,
-0.06482207775115967,
0.06976216286420822,
-0.0028182310052216053,
-0.02132517658174038,
-0.11613703519105911,
0.04333868995308876,
-0.0033509607892483473,
-0.020106570795178413,
0.016554009169340134,
-0.043971188366413116,
0.020619438961148262,
-0.009089959785342216,
0.009713641367852688,
0.039391469210386276,
-0.012487754225730896,
0.009350251406431198,
-0.08647788316011429,
-0.04851773753762245,
0.02447775937616825,
-0.008494960144162178,
0.023063570261001587,
-0.012638214975595474,
-0.05100997909903526,
0.03675990551710129,
0.03771744668483734,
0.030916057527065277,
-0.028798431158065796,
-0.01926880143582821,
-0.019831717014312744,
0.03583517670631409,
0.08063048869371414,
0.00649732630699873,
0.03545527532696724,
-0.041958946734666824,
0.006693818140774965,
-0.024078864604234695,
0.09502369910478592,
0.054634999483823776,
0.004220988135784864,
-0.05180729925632477,
0.01021517813205719,
-0.041098661720752716,
-0.03574559465050697,
0.06131820008158684,
-0.0030944310128688812,
0.08796171098947525,
0.006000818684697151,
4.4925641867161134e-33,
-0.07716735452413559,
0.01899317093193531,
-0.03573813661932945,
0.0887979194521904,
-0.01755509153008461,
-0.0027626880910247564,
0.037273939698934555,
0.09013677388429642,
-0.09250447154045105,
0.0680299699306488,
0.022390201687812805,
-0.045089662075042725,
0.030878892168402672,
0.044495198875665665,
-0.005799654871225357,
0.03523358702659607,
0.06968843936920166,
-0.004063474480062723,
-0.028155116364359856,
-0.03572935611009598,
-0.030507177114486694,
-0.03237851336598396,
-0.0024998304434120655,
0.034929435700178146,
-0.04148077219724655,
0.030205287039279938,
0.04858911409974098,
0.0632987916469574,
-0.021693143993616104,
0.036800533533096313,
0.03896567225456238,
-0.023581488057971,
-0.05063262954354286,
-0.05820295587182045,
0.04826247692108154,
0.08404397964477539,
0.03678114339709282,
-0.0007768925279378891,
0.024848245084285736,
-0.05051735043525696,
0.039668887853622437,
-0.010082785040140152,
0.002244437113404274,
0.11697717010974884,
-0.021961307153105736,
-0.005805923603475094,
-0.048092879354953766,
0.003788944333791733,
0.035172659903764725,
0.07729728519916534,
-0.09319712221622467,
-0.011992926709353924,
-0.021968109533190727,
0.04129430651664734,
-0.022958293557167053,
0.004160518292337656,
-0.0432187058031559,
0.0702132061123848,
-0.01905948668718338,
0.0004752702370751649,
0.005480603780597448,
0.026761434972286224,
-0.033612821251153946,
0.01346849836409092,
-0.022746674716472626,
0.03873894736170769,
-0.024523282423615456,
-0.03632815554738045,
-0.0017924589337781072,
-0.052569907158613205,
0.006689464673399925,
-0.025846485048532486,
-0.1348353624343872,
0.0011394252069294453,
-0.047169335186481476,
-0.05347497761249542,
-0.018427148461341858,
-0.007304163184016943,
-0.009657083079218864,
-0.037726134061813354,
-0.033999841660261154,
0.01841733604669571,
-0.008003143593668938,
-0.005512353032827377,
-0.03353199362754822,
-0.0201805979013443,
0.021665804088115692,
0.01075822301208973,
-0.05747472122311592,
0.01969684660434723,
-0.007240809965878725,
0.023037107661366463,
0.12023406475782394,
0.0032419958151876926,
0.010150063782930374,
-1.3403668397415913e-8,
-0.046724583953619,
0.04062063992023468,
-0.05561641603708267,
-0.0018853341462090611,
0.056323979049921036,
0.049638908356428146,
-0.04154156893491745,
0.0325038842856884,
0.02574923262000084,
-0.018780937418341637,
0.06920813769102097,
0.02598794549703598,
-0.02782331220805645,
0.05757509544491768,
0.09128093719482422,
-0.01532574463635683,
-0.10472093522548676,
-0.027585938572883606,
-0.016222817823290825,
-0.035399287939071655,
-0.010461363941431046,
-0.013999390415847301,
-0.0002939800324384123,
-0.08362972736358643,
0.007932317443192005,
0.006960071157664061,
-0.04422977939248085,
0.07475824654102325,
0.07440952211618423,
-0.04058071970939636,
-0.0018266832921653986,
0.01985001191496849,
0.014382191933691502,
0.020585300400853157,
0.02213379554450512,
-0.06437048316001892,
-0.06369856745004654,
0.01613914780318737,
0.009907381609082222,
-0.0055595203302800655,
-0.05467313155531883,
-0.0233115516602993,
0.07046928256750107,
0.006468005012720823,
-0.047700025141239166,
-0.0036470729392021894,
0.007837599143385887,
-0.004974569659680128,
-0.01241857185959816,
-0.07781214267015457,
-0.0009409073390997946,
-0.008002524264156818,
0.006034235469996929,
0.08434933423995972,
0.10730371624231339,
0.011427774094045162,
0.013366665691137314,
-0.012747352942824364,
0.061454374343156815,
0.03564131259918213,
0.1587459295988083,
0.12640950083732605,
0.04654904082417488,
-0.015717294067144394
] | {
"pdf_file": "DC6ISE73FTS3CSZYA7GWOAXRDY7WRE75.pdf",
"text": " "
} |
[
-0.01179131492972374,
-0.026292571797966957,
-0.007402373943477869,
0.0032374332658946514,
0.09361502528190613,
0.011397442780435085,
-0.10764198750257492,
-0.01575990952551365,
-0.012632505968213081,
-0.012417814694344997,
0.037283752113580704,
-0.007100903894752264,
0.007047525141388178,
-0.054598528891801834,
-0.07249851524829865,
0.009370646439492702,
0.08085981756448746,
0.014212551526725292,
-0.09623493999242783,
0.027414627373218536,
-0.028465164825320244,
0.03636978566646576,
0.03394642099738121,
0.011672956869006157,
-0.037512145936489105,
-0.02809644676744938,
-0.04116957634687424,
-0.09221658110618591,
-0.09503050148487091,
-0.022608086466789246,
0.0366332121193409,
-0.0005593159003183246,
-0.01317945308983326,
-0.002567918738350272,
0.014765334315598011,
0.06412860006093979,
0.06214030086994171,
-0.04637124389410019,
0.046251703053712845,
0.008406159467995167,
-0.017843827605247498,
-0.051232434809207916,
-0.007615718059241772,
0.012501079589128494,
-0.09209542721509933,
-0.012700374238193035,
-0.021837491542100906,
-0.01646900549530983,
0.021376749500632286,
-0.04129306972026825,
0.0077217076905071735,
-0.02570931240916252,
0.03456493467092514,
-0.017695389688014984,
0.06676454097032547,
-0.03217170387506485,
0.03301049768924713,
-0.05929030850529671,
-0.038034845143556595,
0.07177266478538513,
0.08867787569761276,
-0.0693138912320137,
-0.043674174696207047,
-0.0530705563724041,
0.03363918513059616,
-0.04791845753788948,
-0.056028660386800766,
-0.03796537220478058,
0.0066819265484809875,
-0.09468365460634232,
0.0038956154603511095,
-0.03998851403594017,
-0.009484936483204365,
-0.04102710634469986,
0.05634913966059685,
0.08810979127883911,
0.023939600214362144,
0.08256974816322327,
0.14542986452579498,
-0.07266457378864288,
0.04544106870889664,
-0.02846805565059185,
0.06484822928905487,
-0.03566954657435417,
-0.02058393321931362,
-0.008046877570450306,
-0.04004315286874771,
0.027198782190680504,
0.07118908315896988,
0.038389530032873154,
0.032070647925138474,
-0.06092372164130211,
0.0619964636862278,
-0.017204513773322105,
0.002531385514885187,
0.03172454610466957,
-0.020999982953071594,
-0.10327263176441193,
-0.035631485283374786,
-0.002572041004896164,
-0.009079811163246632,
-0.0446712002158165,
0.02065882831811905,
-0.09185586869716644,
0.0096349585801363,
-0.03323196992278099,
-0.038539715111255646,
-0.0010160006349906325,
-0.009080921299755573,
0.10364938527345657,
0.08260000497102737,
0.09046337753534317,
0.010317266918718815,
0.06875226646661758,
-0.0422520786523819,
0.016278166323900223,
-0.007238513324409723,
-0.12112168222665787,
0.07697559148073196,
-0.01055549830198288,
-0.03525475785136223,
0.01577412337064743,
-0.03426140174269676,
-0.07028616219758987,
0.09488345682621002,
-0.08209891617298126,
-0.07505939900875092,
1.4912425108642198e-33,
-0.00489104213193059,
0.05655283108353615,
0.04596081003546715,
-0.09433860331773758,
0.007479013875126839,
-0.052310191094875336,
0.022871438413858414,
-0.02402086742222309,
0.04054899141192436,
-0.0013802186585962772,
-0.024933019652962685,
0.0051351808942854404,
0.04981466010212898,
-0.022013070061802864,
-0.01999053731560707,
-0.0939333587884903,
-0.049292974174022675,
0.010618846863508224,
-0.002241110894829035,
-0.01819581352174282,
-0.02418708987534046,
-0.11037232726812363,
0.03438669070601463,
0.025873230770230293,
0.043708570301532745,
0.007715276908129454,
0.01429600641131401,
-0.047257084399461746,
0.04587828740477562,
-0.0010756911942735314,
0.04214917868375778,
0.041596848517656326,
0.06286109983921051,
-0.015445024706423283,
0.05245594307780266,
-0.020349672064185143,
0.007563638035207987,
-0.06185658276081085,
-0.051814742386341095,
-0.029695892706513405,
0.03482852876186371,
0.037216123193502426,
0.1002112478017807,
0.09415993839502335,
0.023665307089686394,
-0.0009797067614272237,
-0.0215307604521513,
0.08443156629800797,
-0.08662069588899612,
-0.022793879732489586,
0.002747888443991542,
0.007567260880023241,
-0.08721990138292313,
-0.049509432166814804,
-0.04233710840344429,
-0.0552687793970108,
-0.02103213407099247,
-0.015112283639609814,
-0.022284775972366333,
-0.0047380211763083935,
-0.015042957849800587,
0.07397263497114182,
-0.013764876872301102,
0.04260760173201561,
-0.01056425366550684,
-0.010054334998130798,
-0.012660504318773746,
-0.018154196441173553,
0.011265769600868225,
0.09683174639940262,
0.025840450078248978,
-0.061732348054647446,
-0.019188307225704193,
0.0000742273114155978,
-0.04692571610212326,
-0.04540279135107994,
0.04311762750148773,
0.029836587607860565,
0.06766803562641144,
-0.03129039704799652,
0.0795023962855339,
-0.046338293701410294,
0.0118836285546422,
0.05972834676504135,
-0.09675546735525131,
0.03569108620285988,
-0.06580457091331482,
0.043518468737602234,
0.060975801199674606,
0.027736162766814232,
0.029210995882749557,
-0.006382412742823362,
0.047179076820611954,
0.025493886321783066,
-0.04969076067209244,
-3.0459097377820177e-33,
-0.00427916320040822,
-0.02841370366513729,
0.018741564825177193,
0.0010163751430809498,
0.040802620351314545,
-0.0529351681470871,
-0.02915869653224945,
-0.07668223977088928,
0.08730966597795486,
-0.08577442914247513,
-0.03554501384496689,
0.05753954127430916,
0.00914928037673235,
0.07587583363056183,
-0.023443344980478287,
0.0047246054746210575,
0.005171592812985182,
0.005103080999106169,
-0.04680529236793518,
-0.036178722977638245,
-0.0646190196275711,
0.04081618785858154,
-0.022561917081475258,
0.11593542248010635,
-0.058670803904533386,
0.042893167585134506,
-0.027966655790805817,
0.034440360963344574,
-0.020811593160033226,
-0.008363384753465652,
0.04224792867898941,
0.029421405866742134,
-0.05369482561945915,
0.018983544781804085,
-0.11273234337568283,
0.022718412801623344,
0.053172994405031204,
-0.08916711062192917,
-0.022211143746972084,
0.006430933251976967,
0.09567634761333466,
0.019434815272688866,
-0.07304168492555618,
0.04465751722455025,
-0.042900193482637405,
-0.0005887913866899908,
0.02722517028450966,
-0.007948382757604122,
-0.009153521619737148,
0.016485678032040596,
-0.03642023727297783,
-0.04040151461958885,
0.004287928342819214,
-0.006769961211830378,
-0.025385670363903046,
0.07566529512405396,
0.09655172377824783,
-0.05283735319972038,
-0.007450364995747805,
-0.027946975082159042,
-0.04491109400987625,
0.059564195573329926,
-0.034366678446531296,
-0.015872066840529442,
0.03345054015517235,
0.03749638423323631,
0.033813513815402985,
-0.0786154568195343,
0.09173329919576645,
-0.014688614755868912,
0.029510783031582832,
0.02060961164534092,
0.015162726864218712,
-0.03271091729402542,
-0.07955902814865112,
0.091244176030159,
0.016027212142944336,
-0.006251289043575525,
-0.04223059117794037,
0.07846944034099579,
0.00805523619055748,
-0.08343401551246643,
-0.03610081970691681,
0.009712126106023788,
0.12252311408519745,
-0.024493133649230003,
-0.005265781190246344,
-0.0381789468228817,
-0.022896358743309975,
0.11511247605085373,
-0.1275879442691803,
-0.035042665898799896,
0.01994434930384159,
0.024042628705501556,
0.06174231320619583,
-5.01195174251734e-8,
0.12123952805995941,
0.0029488152358680964,
-0.10422489792108536,
0.03947705030441284,
0.0962064117193222,
-0.031891830265522,
-0.07272528856992722,
-0.020049376413226128,
-0.010867845267057419,
0.06531104445457458,
0.018901975825428963,
0.09409216791391373,
-0.06200883910059929,
-0.03262019157409668,
0.015858467668294907,
0.002711348934099078,
0.03277609497308731,
0.057593364268541336,
-0.0668063536286354,
0.04129308834671974,
-0.0644356831908226,
0.0505954809486866,
-0.06022699549794197,
-0.02495919167995453,
0.05134512484073639,
0.04209762439131737,
0.03319065272808075,
0.10337065905332565,
0.06597383320331573,
0.04565505310893059,
0.060448434203863144,
-0.00212005153298378,
-0.012750293128192425,
0.00055455241817981,
-0.031717635691165924,
-0.05637591332197189,
-0.004732971079647541,
0.032191697508096695,
0.09557720273733139,
0.012186134234070778,
-0.041969187557697296,
0.08504887670278549,
-0.08101058751344681,
0.04337804391980171,
-0.09749088436365128,
0.005857301410287619,
-0.15317001938819885,
0.02938426285982132,
0.05591399595141411,
-0.04020407050848007,
0.010496092028915882,
-0.013719954527914524,
0.02127380296587944,
0.06295090168714523,
0.00021877925610169768,
0.04697277024388313,
-0.015842007473111153,
-0.059463564306497574,
0.030776364728808403,
0.004210143815726042,
-0.01655537635087967,
-0.09329187870025635,
0.012351823039352894,
0.009048424661159515
] | {
"pdf_file": "TBSL3JP4OKORY5OXRTTF7MJE64PSQOO6.pdf",
"text": "August 14, 2007 - Farr Leads Charge for Federal Food Safety Support\n WASHINGTON, D.C. - Rep. Sam Farr this summer championed efforts in the House of\nRepresentatives to significantly boost federal funding for food safety research and oversight\nefforts. \n \n House versions of the farm bill and the annual agriculture appropriations bill include $60 million\nin new money to support work in those areas. Funds would augment the Department of\nAgriculture's food safety research capacity, increase the federal government's commitment to\nfund university and other non-federal research and enhance the Food and Drug Administration's\nfood safety oversight role. \n \n "During last year's spinach recall, the nation felt the sting of what happens when our food\nsafeguards fail," said Rep. Farr (D-Carmel). "Federal, state and local officials are\ndoing everything they can to prevent another outbreak, and these funds will help them in their\nefforts. The Central Coast, with its billions of dollars in farm sales, is Ground Zero in the work to\nkeep our food safe, and I look forward to pursuing every opportunity to support our farmers and\nkeep our nation healthy." \n \n The programs: \n \n Farm Bill: $25 million for fresh produce safety grants. At Rep. Farr's request and with support\nfrom Rep. Dennis Cardoza (D-Atwater) and other California agriculture advocates, the House of\nRepresentatives on July 27 included these funds for food safety research in its version of the\nfarm bill, which is reauthorized every five years. \n \n These competitive grants will be managed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and will be\nawarded to national laboratories, universities, state agricultural stations and other research\norganizations. This funding is an automatic $5 million per year in new research funds and won't\nneed to be approved through the annual funding process. \n \n Agriculture Appropriations: $35 million to overhaul FDA's food safety operations. The House\napproved funds in its annual appropriations process for the USDA and FDA to plan for and\nbegin work on a comprehensive overhaul of FDA's food safety operations. The bill also\n 1 / 2 August 14, 2007 - Farr Leads Charge for Federal Food Safety Support\nrecommends implementation of enforceable safety standards such as the Hazard Analysis and\nCritical Control Point, known as HACCP, a food industry control system. In addition to domestic\nfood safety, the FDA is also responsible for overseeing the safety of imported foods, lately a\nlightning rod for criticism. \n \n "In the past several years, USDA researchers have pursued innovative research\nprograms. Unfortunately, these programs lack funds to pursue research on the scale\nnecessary," said Rep. Farr. "Produce industry leaders have told me again and again\nthat food safety research should be a top federal priority. I'm glad the House has recognized\nthis and I look forward to success in the Senate." \n \n Both the farm bill and the Agriculture Appropriations bill must go through the Senate and be\nsigned by the president. Increased attention to food safety suggests that any versions of these\nbills would include increased funding for oversight and research. Heightened attention to\nimports, especially from China, will also lend pressure for federal action. \n \n # # # \n \n 2 / 2"
} |
[
-0.08235461264848709,
-0.038163695484399796,
0.029809949919581413,
-0.02569027990102768,
0.03353513032197952,
0.03201039880514145,
-0.0024917738046497107,
-0.011701049283146858,
0.003613112960010767,
0.032196901738643646,
-0.024888554587960243,
0.10496952384710312,
-0.0081279082223773,
-0.04074491560459137,
-0.03401493281126022,
0.00647152541205287,
-0.03738328069448471,
0.009391660802066326,
0.01218406856060028,
-0.016910139471292496,
0.02783087082207203,
0.026920195668935776,
0.019291367381811142,
0.033320724964141846,
-0.01697550341486931,
0.0640939325094223,
0.004359477199614048,
-0.07374195009469986,
-0.029264401644468307,
0.01024441234767437,
0.038898345082998276,
-0.030593276023864746,
-0.005248131230473518,
-0.00817633606493473,
0.009528989903628826,
0.012370314449071884,
0.07098258286714554,
0.044442400336265564,
0.045801352709531784,
-0.0198039710521698,
-0.043148912489414215,
-0.08773508667945862,
-0.05116768181324005,
0.06508207321166992,
0.04767756909132004,
0.022331058979034424,
0.012093210592865944,
-0.0070498110726475716,
-0.014861088246107101,
0.022675758227705956,
0.020316261798143387,
-0.041926123201847076,
0.05018465593457222,
-0.13727176189422607,
0.0543050654232502,
0.05894041061401367,
0.07256072759628296,
-0.0023526614531874657,
-0.0025571819860488176,
0.0013042895589023829,
-0.003935946151614189,
-0.10913417488336563,
0.02139967493712902,
0.0165356807410717,
0.03135840594768524,
0.00517377769574523,
-0.06070011481642723,
-0.008217177353799343,
0.007354431319981813,
0.006618730258196592,
0.03343537822365761,
-0.0074624051339924335,
0.025551913306117058,
-0.014063378795981407,
0.040400002151727676,
-0.05492877960205078,
0.0731639564037323,
0.10169489681720734,
0.07675128430128098,
-0.08184779435396194,
0.04587342590093613,
0.01846942864358425,
-0.07613231241703033,
0.001249033259227872,
-0.07088089734315872,
0.011383727192878723,
-0.03242255747318268,
0.008674691431224346,
0.007684459909796715,
0.048403650522232056,
0.0023085367865860462,
-0.05593429133296013,
-0.07642755657434464,
-0.007375641260296106,
-0.11042912304401398,
0.020682737231254578,
-0.05357047915458679,
-0.046038318425416946,
-0.004043631721287966,
0.03908862546086311,
0.006202986463904381,
0.08618327975273132,
-0.03930226340889931,
-0.04772091284394264,
-0.050031132996082306,
-0.053292471915483475,
0.006788542959839106,
-0.03976317122578621,
0.0716630071401596,
0.0566844679415226,
0.05932105332612991,
0.006276584696024656,
-0.041409801691770554,
0.07053273916244507,
-0.05427567660808563,
-0.03383873030543327,
-0.041504789143800735,
-0.004703702870756388,
0.0741676390171051,
-0.000023950384274940006,
-0.02314002811908722,
0.0054575600661337376,
-0.033649686723947525,
-0.05247058346867561,
-0.04547679424285889,
-0.032719410955905914,
-0.004807393532246351,
-5.708703826111974e-34,
0.00028490665135905147,
0.11595084518194199,
0.003907845821231604,
0.08529602736234665,
-0.04443131387233734,
0.0363428108394146,
0.056960057467222214,
-0.045102108269929886,
-0.09073349833488464,
-0.004920443054288626,
0.011037873104214668,
0.0032436521723866463,
0.012750194407999516,
0.14062581956386566,
-0.012614571489393711,
-0.105702243745327,
-0.09382392466068268,
-0.013325359672307968,
0.04087505117058754,
-0.056097812950611115,
0.04536993429064751,
-0.016470029950141907,
0.014980443753302097,
-0.07376617938280106,
0.07565739750862122,
-0.034335751086473465,
-0.04146311804652214,
0.014810136519372463,
-0.004769948311150074,
0.03456110134720802,
0.010110105387866497,
0.04116078093647957,
-0.0017906620632857084,
0.0007235268130898476,
0.04634713754057884,
-0.06329213827848434,
-0.012607031501829624,
-0.07835190743207932,
0.01776042766869068,
-0.04518386349081993,
0.029936738312244415,
0.08026637136936188,
0.032835524529218674,
0.010079801082611084,
-0.017317483201622963,
0.03214985132217407,
0.08482560515403748,
0.07501526176929474,
0.1420346051454544,
-0.06101815402507782,
-0.03791242465376854,
0.03215394914150238,
0.11861685663461685,
-0.13067969679832458,
0.036804914474487305,
-0.07731807231903076,
-0.046455588191747665,
-0.003833846654742956,
0.057384323328733444,
-0.02938148006796837,
-0.07355222851037979,
0.11069339513778687,
-0.06295952200889587,
0.07447149604558945,
-0.08782292157411575,
0.07115872204303741,
-0.04963728412985802,
0.07266789674758911,
0.08221611380577087,
0.05162016674876213,
0.09295053780078888,
-0.0633254200220108,
-0.04196259006857872,
-0.046171050518751144,
-0.06178491935133934,
0.025836382061243057,
0.06889306753873825,
0.014774289913475513,
0.021490873768925667,
-0.05574927479028702,
-0.06228777766227722,
-0.0552571564912796,
0.05145493522286415,
-0.03772277012467384,
0.0030744171235710382,
0.025524653494358063,
-0.014812380075454712,
0.06977644562721252,
0.04141479358077049,
0.04768635332584381,
-0.025330081582069397,
-0.015969572588801384,
0.050781164318323135,
0.041504256427288055,
-0.06333651393651962,
-2.542276346340909e-33,
-0.04600917175412178,
0.03276512771844864,
0.024087361991405487,
-0.03747239336371422,
0.04768656939268112,
-0.03409918397665024,
0.0011746386298909783,
-0.08466430753469467,
-0.0491296760737896,
-0.14132089912891388,
0.0421377532184124,
0.07658379524946213,
0.016281157732009888,
0.08344992250204086,
-0.03438495099544525,
0.02443520724773407,
-0.07397019863128662,
-0.02244565077126026,
0.013640180230140686,
-0.06240274757146835,
0.004441052675247192,
0.02239442802965641,
-0.09083462506532669,
0.09448231756687164,
-0.007370028179138899,
-0.013709363527595997,
0.04725746437907219,
0.07557119429111481,
0.03523559123277664,
0.03923409804701805,
0.037469398230314255,
0.041319817304611206,
-0.11320009082555771,
0.14161592721939087,
-0.008348041214048862,
0.0397501178085804,
0.03496003895998001,
0.0036845665890723467,
-0.06272190064191818,
0.0020625225733965635,
0.0010239529656246305,
-0.029393615201115608,
-0.02166127599775791,
-0.007436160929501057,
0.01587013527750969,
0.0057186405174434185,
0.009606650099158287,
0.02659500017762184,
-0.0771845206618309,
0.09763630479574203,
-0.04805661365389824,
0.00012677353515755385,
0.026638036593794823,
0.009576067328453064,
-0.046555038541555405,
0.07160504162311554,
0.04346398636698723,
0.014586936682462692,
0.11944808065891266,
0.0037370037753134966,
-0.005190685857087374,
0.04626716300845146,
0.014251749962568283,
0.014861822128295898,
-0.017584845423698425,
-0.09170342981815338,
0.038578782230615616,
0.07841679453849792,
-0.008050243370234966,
-0.04195701703429222,
-0.002352625597268343,
0.00831566285341978,
-0.06594152748584747,
-0.14611490070819855,
-0.021524416282773018,
0.0513509176671505,
0.009226515889167786,
-0.007228325121104717,
-0.11401867866516113,
0.05937908589839935,
0.005916695576161146,
0.019692258909344673,
0.003125977236777544,
-0.009212462231516838,
0.012892226688563824,
0.07290958613157272,
-0.059300247579813004,
-0.03732774406671524,
-0.04844190925359726,
0.05819448456168175,
-0.09662438929080963,
-0.03175266832113266,
-0.10978513211011887,
-0.03134865686297417,
-0.04289204999804497,
-5.5073872573530025e-8,
0.013121893629431725,
-0.04335647448897362,
0.06469103693962097,
-0.045119404792785645,
-0.0047744144685566425,
-0.06654971837997437,
0.0049831317737698555,
-0.024529779329895973,
-0.028368499130010605,
-0.067143015563488,
0.039683423936367035,
0.0008803388918749988,
-0.01122954860329628,
-0.003938579931855202,
0.039801403880119324,
-0.02097189798951149,
-0.06573360413312912,
0.07097159326076508,
-0.07567455619573593,
-0.01673411950469017,
0.006479427218437195,
0.03818957135081291,
0.008170406334102154,
0.0029312376864254475,
-0.014156678691506386,
0.03778989985585213,
0.04521830007433891,
0.037570979446172714,
0.01660820096731186,
-0.013596084900200367,
-0.0005985840689390898,
-0.031675904989242554,
-0.017804231494665146,
0.012174473144114017,
0.07301874458789825,
-0.04117249324917793,
-0.034390419721603394,
-0.04545523226261139,
0.04093017801642418,
0.025934088975191116,
-0.04493739455938339,
0.05430661886930466,
0.0038182667922228575,
0.04853898659348488,
-0.04782113805413246,
-0.04950708523392677,
-0.07954520732164383,
0.054098162800073624,
0.057661037892103195,
0.030219707638025284,
-0.009086454287171364,
-0.035128284245729446,
-0.05042548105120659,
-0.024466555565595627,
0.06116633862257004,
0.0021709101274609566,
-0.056905873119831085,
-0.03096194937825203,
-0.06158646196126938,
-0.02602207288146019,
0.06142108514904976,
-0.0825638622045517,
0.07373835146427155,
-0.030493658035993576
] | {
"pdf_file": "HDOB32Q5ZOTQJCMF2TY5XEPUD4VRCUH7.pdf",
"text": "(March 14, 2007) Vice Chairman Lipinski Promotes American Competitiveness\nAgenda\n\r\n \r\n\r\n\r\nVice Chairman Lipinski Promotes American Competitiveness Agenda\n\r\nHelps Unveil \"American Innovation Proclamation\" \r\n\r\n\r\nWASHINGTON, DC - Yesterday, House Science and Technology Committee Vice Chair Dan Lipinski joined Committee\nChairman Bart Gordon, leaders from industry and higher education, and a bipartisan group of House and Senate\nmembers to unveil the American Innovation Proclamation. Signed by more than 270 leaders representing American\nbusinesses and higher education, the proclamation emphasizes strong support for legislative efforts to adopt an\ninnovation agenda that will ensure U.S. competitiveness and enable Americans to succeed in the global economy. \r\n\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n\r\nThe proclamation includes calls for Congress to renew America's commitment to discovery by doubling federal basic\nresearch funding, to improve student achievement in math and science by providing incentives for teachers and funding\nproven programs, and to encourage private-sector innovation investment by strengthening the research and\ndevelopment tax credit. The document was unveiled by Harold McGraw III, Chairman and President of The McGraw Hill\nCompanies, Norman Augustine, Former Chairman and CEO of Lockheed Martin Corporation, and Robert Dynes,\nPresident of the University of California. \r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\"As an engineer and a former educator I understand that the keys to America's economic future are education and\ntechnological innovation,\" said Lipinski. \"The proposals called for in this proclamation would ensure that America is\nprepared to meet the challenge of an increasingly global economy and I thank our business and education leaders for\npressing Congress to meet this great challenge of our time.\" \r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nLast Congress, Lipinski and colleagues on the Science Committee led the House in introducing an innovation package of\nlegislation built upon the recommendations of the widely acknowledged Rising Above the Gathering Storm report issued\nby the National Academy of Sciences. That innovation package in the 110th Congress includes H.R. 362 and H.R. 363,\nboth cosponsored by Congressman Lipinski. The \"10,000 Teachers, 10 Million Minds Science and Math Scholarship Act\"\n(H.R. 362) seeks to establish a program to provide scholarships to students who commit to become science or math\nteachers at public elementary and secondary schools. The \"Sowing the Seeds Through Science and Engineering\nResearch Act\" (H.R. 363) seeks to double funding for basic research in the physical sciences in seven years and invest aCongressman Daniel Lipinski\nhttp://www.lipinski.house.gov Powered by Joomla! Generated: 26 February, 2009, 10:45 portion of such funds to support high-risk, high-payoff research. \r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nIn addition to these bills, the House of Representatives earlier this week passed Congressman Dan Lipinski's bill to\nreauthorize the Steel and Aluminum Energy Conservation and Technology Competitiveness Act of 1988. H.R. 1126,\nknown as the Metals Initiative, provides research funding to make the manufacturing of American steel and other metals\nmore efficient and environmentally friendly. As a result of this legislation, American metals industries will get help\ndeveloping and implementing cost-saving and environmentally-friendly modern technology through critical grants to\nuniversities and other research institutions. \r\n\r\nCongressman Daniel Lipinski\nhttp://www.lipinski.house.gov Powered by Joomla! Generated: 26 February, 2009, 10:45"
} |
[
-0.06848693639039993,
0.0871773511171341,
-0.060240406543016434,
-0.021494043990969658,
-0.05710871145129204,
0.0011583903105929494,
-0.02332271635532379,
-0.05235002562403679,
0.015702510252594948,
0.007847839035093784,
0.008379035629332066,
0.010949162766337395,
-0.027110375463962555,
-0.03436639904975891,
-0.006128100212663412,
-0.0033644631039351225,
0.07386616617441177,
-0.08371273428201675,
-0.02293246239423752,
0.0365925207734108,
0.02776503562927246,
0.04857019707560539,
-0.033209774643182755,
-0.05497809126973152,
0.06846687942743301,
0.011510636657476425,
-0.05823662132024765,
-0.03030508942902088,
0.035829752683639526,
-0.06107621267437935,
0.05811864510178566,
-0.01802213303744793,
-0.044227853417396545,
-0.022237200289964676,
0.11938226968050003,
0.0770951509475708,
-0.06199626252055168,
-0.02571696601808071,
-0.006337652914226055,
0.02785876765847206,
0.022566936910152435,
-0.07059261202812195,
0.0012723836116492748,
0.005132247228175402,
-0.04754586145281792,
-0.056330710649490356,
-0.02217305637896061,
0.0045005520805716515,
-0.02225741744041443,
0.07060826569795609,
0.05663372948765755,
0.029749898239970207,
-0.046363309025764465,
-0.04103182628750801,
-0.05609270557761192,
0.04495171085000038,
-0.012097173370420933,
0.029030488803982735,
-0.08871228247880936,
0.017412938177585602,
0.057504720985889435,
-0.020106323063373566,
-0.04505045339465141,
0.03620437905192375,
-0.07027029246091843,
0.0011862633982673287,
0.06467778980731964,
-0.021662093698978424,
-0.03239449858665466,
-0.1268722116947174,
0.10566550493240356,
-0.000768941652495414,
0.006976017262786627,
0.029009448364377022,
0.1304343193769455,
0.09083051979541779,
0.014382021501660347,
-0.0045222146436572075,
0.08389288187026978,
0.002294112229719758,
-0.020661739632487297,
-0.06287401169538498,
-0.031831055879592896,
-0.04311172291636467,
-0.03492338955402374,
0.01895758882164955,
0.033165935426950455,
0.018413785845041275,
0.09805068373680115,
-0.04195987433195114,
0.06771520525217056,
0.00042894750367850065,
-0.012621858157217503,
-0.0041708992794156075,
0.048296183347702026,
0.06039753928780556,
-0.021512610837817192,
-0.06552941352128983,
-0.10524014383554459,
0.09018217772245407,
0.014428053051233292,
0.01911837048828602,
-0.02303338795900345,
-0.01007235236465931,
0.03427388519048691,
-0.00977474357932806,
-0.022598018869757652,
-0.00529317045584321,
0.005184633191674948,
-0.001772916060872376,
0.00603234488517046,
0.05497563257813454,
0.09814734756946564,
0.027755897492170334,
-0.07938149571418762,
0.02768353931605816,
-0.10863729566335678,
-0.05595928430557251,
0.09711162000894547,
-0.1031358614563942,
-0.032767824828624725,
0.053444236516952515,
0.011900882236659527,
-0.041733518242836,
-0.03846926614642143,
-0.056322138756513596,
-0.017557211220264435,
5.0022702921761655e-33,
0.04632701724767685,
0.017096925526857376,
-0.025756126269698143,
-0.08006523549556732,
-0.014791816473007202,
-0.00784948281943798,
0.03179551661014557,
0.011266883462667465,
-0.012925209477543831,
-0.02658167853951454,
-0.015657268464565277,
0.044831532984972,
0.09131178259849548,
-0.006581936031579971,
-0.02426939085125923,
-0.02018493413925171,
-0.028447225689888,
0.07643073797225952,
0.06943376362323761,
0.028264323249459267,
-0.052876658737659454,
-0.03333397954702377,
0.004480605013668537,
0.035699665546417236,
-0.021988924592733383,
0.036558397114276886,
-0.056143708527088165,
-0.033782124519348145,
0.04466908052563667,
0.028714913874864578,
0.007390737999230623,
0.019153138622641563,
0.05511957406997681,
-0.08861523866653442,
0.03720434010028839,
0.03334961086511612,
-0.024487953633069992,
-0.023565473034977913,
-0.021950924769043922,
-0.059382304549217224,
0.015329429879784584,
0.058994654566049576,
0.012811239808797836,
0.06001918762922287,
-0.03271784260869026,
-0.006681898143142462,
0.10956893116235733,
0.06743903458118439,
0.0021313128527253866,
0.038101449608802795,
-0.07493675500154495,
-0.007793703582137823,
-0.058486100286245346,
0.048026297241449356,
-0.0803915485739708,
-0.08185399323701859,
-0.04178763926029205,
0.003508848138153553,
-0.035947058349847794,
-0.092055544257164,
0.03869015723466873,
0.008093426935374737,
0.028997138142585754,
-0.016960835084319115,
-0.1341138631105423,
-0.06451771408319473,
0.030177287757396698,
-0.03707210719585419,
0.041504278779029846,
-0.03808317705988884,
0.06651824712753296,
-0.026151275262236595,
-0.017618991434574127,
-0.03579450026154518,
0.027191294357180595,
-0.01569175347685814,
0.13483703136444092,
0.06411194056272507,
0.11440403759479523,
-0.038365673273801804,
0.030353998765349388,
0.019778432324528694,
0.054649922996759415,
-0.019847603514790535,
-0.028459062799811363,
-0.014028902165591717,
0.008282637223601341,
-0.05344001576304436,
0.07522289454936981,
-0.017850499600172043,
-0.006951936986297369,
-0.003270823508501053,
-0.09446834772825241,
0.008040265180170536,
0.07323571294546127,
-6.1537874969775554e-33,
0.0018251470755785704,
-0.04224862530827522,
0.01899638958275318,
0.0524691641330719,
0.03995823487639427,
-0.02438363991677761,
0.06717319041490555,
0.03503681719303131,
0.06938744336366653,
0.01011580415070057,
0.03177381306886673,
0.04176098480820656,
0.05944664031267166,
-0.04933306574821472,
-0.008944491855800152,
-0.07419544458389282,
-0.024507420137524605,
-0.0035232652444392443,
0.1199202612042427,
0.041014354676008224,
0.06467445939779282,
0.04088912159204483,
-0.030007561668753624,
0.06662076711654663,
0.05880645290017128,
-0.012127255089581013,
-0.030135463923215866,
-0.14148318767547607,
-0.05102439597249031,
-0.04682513326406479,
0.04462098702788353,
-0.053753551095724106,
-0.0994362011551857,
0.09696304798126221,
-0.05323909968137741,
0.006252352613955736,
0.12685412168502808,
-0.016683019697666168,
-0.09876678884029388,
-0.04012541100382805,
0.09555350244045258,
-0.025578387081623077,
-0.032436225563287735,
0.014103627763688564,
0.0022494413424283266,
-0.03148762509226799,
0.04451824352145195,
0.0029190564528107643,
0.07800613343715668,
-0.030571801587939262,
-0.08046314865350723,
0.04907834902405739,
0.057101741433143616,
0.04441986605525017,
-0.018692757934331894,
0.051883623003959656,
0.02440810389816761,
0.011485791765153408,
0.004070575349032879,
0.06847947090864182,
-0.02858797274529934,
0.05021651089191437,
0.008989018388092518,
-0.04199356585741043,
0.038908448070287704,
0.03558185696601868,
-0.04176759347319603,
-0.023365603759884834,
-0.03779901936650276,
-0.01780621148645878,
0.0767982006072998,
-0.028953082859516144,
0.022247616201639175,
-0.06770510226488113,
0.0394723042845726,
0.009779074229300022,
0.04571153223514557,
-0.03902889043092728,
-0.04676642268896103,
-0.05863683298230171,
-0.04681128263473511,
0.01940293237566948,
-0.06218631938099861,
0.034499846398830414,
0.012808012776076794,
0.04246513545513153,
0.09529353678226471,
-0.07083462178707123,
-0.03950662538409233,
0.1208597868680954,
-0.11202136427164078,
-0.0011197746498510242,
0.05206751078367233,
0.02810823917388916,
-0.02778274565935135,
-5.629804888940271e-8,
0.03493479639291763,
0.0839160606265068,
-0.0016426496440544724,
0.011324025690555573,
-0.014257337898015976,
0.02071518264710903,
0.011941608972847462,
-0.0008109121699817479,
-0.024243401363492012,
-0.005457129329442978,
0.03951747715473175,
-0.00782124511897564,
-0.11029061675071716,
-0.033737655729055405,
-0.01222560927271843,
0.0034294058568775654,
-0.0720624029636383,
-0.0494554340839386,
-0.04261571541428566,
-0.07616773247718811,
0.04614207148551941,
0.01826651766896248,
0.07580995559692383,
-0.05472658574581146,
-0.04457831382751465,
0.005916398949921131,
0.03878714144229889,
0.07450608909130096,
-0.027391575276851654,
-0.0006814636290073395,
-0.019763821735978127,
0.01559821330010891,
0.01747068017721176,
-0.05116043612360954,
0.02146342024207115,
0.02471529319882393,
-0.0067020501010119915,
0.06126491352915764,
0.015694066882133484,
0.04473874717950821,
-0.0948595181107521,
0.002976555610075593,
0.008187920786440372,
-0.0015176782617345452,
0.018619906157255173,
0.021580634638667107,
-0.09151776134967804,
0.0018895987886935472,
0.05518341064453125,
-0.06608645617961884,
-0.044633448123931885,
-0.07665441185235977,
-0.09022058546543121,
-0.0644887313246727,
0.013242009095847607,
-0.07568911463022232,
0.04196750000119209,
-0.06921231746673584,
0.061540521681308746,
-0.007367265876382589,
0.023706506937742233,
-0.11173993349075317,
-0.04245825856924057,
0.02609865739941597
] | {
"pdf_file": "Y2OOMETPKX3ZMEMJJYX5MHOHTIO3JVSP.pdf",
"text": "Arkansas Scholarship Lottery \nLittle Rock, AR 72203- 3238 124 West Capitol Avenue, Suite 1400 \n \n \nANTICIPATION OF AWARD \n Bid Number: ALC – 090008 \n Bid Opening Date: September 8 , 2009 \n Commodity Services: Retailer Surety Bonding Program \n Projected Total Value: Zero. All costs will be borne by the retailers \n Posting date: September 11 , 2009 \n Vendor: The Bond Exchange \n Contact: Bishop Woosley – (501) 683- 1890 - \nbishop.woosley@arkansas.gov \n \n \nVendors and agenci es are cautioned that these are preliminary results only, \nand no official award will be issued prior to the end of the fourteen (14) day \nposting period. Accordingly, any reliance on these preliminary results is at the \nagency’s/vendor’s own risk. The ALC r eserves the right to waive this policy \nwhen it is in the best interests of the State. \n \n "
} |
[
-0.05970449000597,
-0.03887428715825081,
0.004984740633517504,
0.012175827287137508,
0.03771801292896271,
-0.04102475196123123,
0.002043166197836399,
0.009859570302069187,
-0.033965688198804855,
0.0456678681075573,
-0.04189462587237358,
-0.005323988851159811,
-0.004843407776206732,
0.004769680555909872,
0.04133814573287964,
-0.01406831294298172,
0.07523015886545181,
-0.09625560790300369,
0.03909006342291832,
0.009901796467602253,
0.09215876460075378,
-0.0441855750977993,
-0.09260359406471252,
-0.018782557919621468,
-0.045209139585494995,
-0.007942683063447475,
-0.11480735242366791,
0.0031742348801344633,
0.021827947348356247,
-0.061977170407772064,
-0.023552389815449715,
0.017876166850328445,
0.036029066890478134,
0.039912670850753784,
0.08740493655204773,
0.0017742532072588801,
-0.007018888369202614,
-0.024570047855377197,
0.021025922149419785,
-0.025068406015634537,
0.037062279880046844,
-0.07586448639631271,
0.04466370865702629,
0.031673237681388855,
-0.026513801887631416,
-0.03689572215080261,
0.035708989948034286,
-0.04018170386552811,
-0.04330381751060486,
0.0281703881919384,
0.07322646677494049,
-0.015063481405377388,
0.09728658199310303,
-0.04653818532824516,
-0.1146467849612236,
0.005627750419080257,
0.022740166634321213,
-0.09136677533388138,
-0.007509724237024784,
-0.02450367622077465,
-0.01376277580857277,
-0.011523569002747536,
-0.05604305490851402,
0.0372452586889267,
-0.002278613392263651,
0.045491695404052734,
-0.08535370230674744,
-0.04992980137467384,
0.04162579029798508,
-0.0914837121963501,
-0.08221807330846786,
-0.027232253924012184,
-0.02110935188829899,
0.033503301441669464,
0.04886350780725479,
0.05806652456521988,
-0.00817196536809206,
0.08744902908802032,
0.09932892769575119,
-0.08400317281484604,
-0.011012088507413864,
-0.01710357703268528,
-0.057858336716890335,
-0.018194861710071564,
-0.016355199739336967,
0.05646590143442154,
0.06718400865793228,
0.03675137832760811,
0.028151391074061394,
0.05348336696624756,
0.14485536515712738,
0.03676002845168114,
0.034066855907440186,
0.08191628009080887,
0.06638158112764359,
0.012171098031103611,
0.01885545253753662,
-0.08053363859653473,
0.010889308527112007,
0.009785439819097519,
0.06715135276317596,
0.03905821964144707,
-0.01110165100544691,
-0.011120708659291267,
-0.02664288878440857,
-0.0603242889046669,
-0.0030500951688736677,
-0.0775863453745842,
0.09474743902683258,
0.048060573637485504,
-0.06675387173891068,
0.017933351919054985,
0.08882813900709152,
-0.004419575911015272,
0.031299442052841187,
-0.010238164104521275,
-0.06241290643811226,
-0.0258296187967062,
0.06512221693992615,
-0.03158954530954361,
0.023559298366308212,
-0.03267442807555199,
-0.012973209843039513,
-0.09943477064371109,
0.1466662436723709,
0.018403375521302223,
-0.04420884698629379,
6.162856068552165e-33,
-0.08377739787101746,
0.02025505155324936,
0.0012643665540963411,
-0.005494485609233379,
-0.06043775752186775,
-0.03257288783788681,
0.030651621520519257,
0.0879167914390564,
-0.025122784078121185,
-0.023985927924513817,
-0.05639488995075226,
0.09793250262737274,
-0.018253587186336517,
-0.011457109823822975,
0.013127467595040798,
0.08660204708576202,
0.09451724588871002,
-0.022447029128670692,
0.08251342177391052,
0.03358208015561104,
-0.0007086019613780081,
-0.13131488859653473,
-0.024838408455252647,
0.005002922378480434,
0.028710633516311646,
0.017962679266929626,
-0.057734761387109756,
0.03164549544453621,
0.036184608936309814,
0.04024888947606087,
0.08571071922779083,
-0.04990512505173683,
-0.033753179013729095,
0.11698636412620544,
-0.036766525357961655,
-0.04001963138580322,
0.06599549949169159,
0.023242296651005745,
-0.04438961297273636,
-0.005763910710811615,
-0.04202582314610481,
0.04637550935149193,
0.08724261820316315,
0.07366511970758438,
-0.005394753534346819,
-0.05676022544503212,
0.023031994700431824,
0.005774889141321182,
0.07158201187849045,
0.0660601407289505,
-0.031553611159324646,
0.033354759216308594,
0.009450564160943031,
0.004060167353600264,
-0.011090465821325779,
0.019612420350313187,
-0.007998623885214329,
-0.03591325506567955,
0.006168793886899948,
0.032784730195999146,
0.007923389784991741,
-0.0360092967748642,
-0.05066428706049919,
0.00958502758294344,
-0.04070814326405525,
-0.06463133543729782,
-0.07179489731788635,
-0.07649318873882294,
0.05742168053984642,
0.08716998249292374,
0.02683805115520954,
-0.020982248708605766,
-0.021702827885746956,
0.026604922488331795,
-0.05167413502931595,
-0.08337613940238953,
0.07730142027139664,
0.12319806218147278,
0.07110804319381714,
0.05415939539670944,
-0.03794771060347557,
-0.0013476191088557243,
-0.00625798013061285,
-0.004789865110069513,
0.012611224316060543,
-0.07975928485393524,
0.011693519540131092,
-0.062056995928287506,
-0.015875158831477165,
-0.026593340560793877,
-0.017062168568372726,
-0.013120574876666069,
-0.0303812138736248,
0.055993348360061646,
0.06030923128128052,
-5.2147802016796496e-33,
0.004967142827808857,
0.0055661192163825035,
-0.022142359986901283,
0.042268894612789154,
0.0273574385792017,
0.017730602994561195,
0.04603945463895798,
-0.02353726141154766,
0.04873446002602577,
0.03629760816693306,
-0.020136114209890366,
0.00993059016764164,
0.021850652992725372,
-0.06678339838981628,
-0.022588033229112625,
-0.08395510166883469,
0.035380952060222626,
-0.06199965626001358,
0.027038300409913063,
-0.015531538985669613,
0.014968996867537498,
0.1081496924161911,
-0.029318591579794884,
-0.017500484362244606,
-0.044515617191791534,
-0.0209223423153162,
-0.0770082101225853,
-0.025272700935602188,
-0.03892696648836136,
-0.003388072596862912,
0.03448053449392319,
0.07933562248945236,
-0.04644639045000076,
0.06922106444835663,
-0.08178295940160751,
-0.08733000606298447,
0.08431138843297958,
0.05380617454648018,
-0.060704875737428665,
0.005820619873702526,
0.09873396158218384,
0.04378071427345276,
-0.011306197382509708,
0.00417206110432744,
0.008920985274016857,
0.11224329471588135,
-0.01790877990424633,
-0.024789903312921524,
0.0006464057951234281,
0.007966994307935238,
-0.001036296016536653,
-0.0632067620754242,
0.09140462428331375,
-0.016281675547361374,
0.05073116347193718,
-0.004243473056703806,
0.02929861471056938,
-0.05146704986691475,
-0.09722772985696793,
-0.00410674512386322,
0.08040104061365128,
0.04076005145907402,
-0.07762865722179413,
-0.035855576395988464,
0.008665956556797028,
-0.08412914723157883,
0.04676618054509163,
0.05057934671640396,
-0.027535639703273773,
0.05387837439775467,
-0.08806267380714417,
-0.05804704129695892,
-0.015293450094759464,
-0.030794844031333923,
-0.008533160202205181,
-0.0021725320257246494,
0.02327559143304825,
-0.030200965702533722,
0.014549209736287594,
-0.07373689115047455,
-0.09977667033672333,
0.06685107946395874,
-0.09093644469976425,
0.02617333084344864,
-0.024566559121012688,
0.07919430732727051,
0.05772935599088669,
-0.02024300955235958,
0.06845128536224365,
0.08344804495573044,
-0.07969710230827332,
0.03388111665844917,
-0.0557088740170002,
0.05660059675574303,
-0.024459736421704292,
-5.6742745613291845e-8,
0.020584506914019585,
-0.024744421243667603,
0.0023368997499346733,
-0.015128025785088539,
-0.02090882509946823,
0.034596484154462814,
-0.034648697823286057,
0.025911936536431313,
-0.0045022182166576385,
-0.01493819896131754,
-0.0037983120419085026,
0.004900431260466576,
0.004326709546148777,
0.010268645361065865,
0.01581437885761261,
0.038578443229198456,
0.02166372537612915,
0.006468144711107016,
-0.07153581082820892,
-0.047290679067373276,
-0.06789230555295944,
0.04240870103240013,
-0.026720887050032616,
0.015976540744304657,
0.018701262772083282,
0.040556542575359344,
-0.00013604635023511946,
0.018628790974617004,
0.006905793212354183,
0.028317898511886597,
-0.02885862998664379,
-0.030312977731227875,
0.012435995042324066,
-0.01182465348392725,
-0.04562661424279213,
-0.009215233847498894,
0.0008866257849149406,
-0.05364414304494858,
0.060771603137254715,
0.08021604269742966,
0.005557877477258444,
0.04832004755735397,
0.0706791952252388,
-0.04166562110185623,
-0.04056578874588013,
-0.022236960008740425,
-0.13506293296813965,
-0.0074646663852036,
0.0786692276597023,
-0.10772931575775146,
-0.010726621374487877,
-0.06077978387475014,
-0.11309080570936203,
0.02103140577673912,
0.06467678397893906,
-0.014765619300305843,
0.031546302139759064,
-0.04205814003944397,
0.03112874925136566,
0.019220635294914246,
0.12481671571731567,
-0.009642628952860832,
-0.06710559129714966,
0.027715466916561127
] | {
"pdf_file": "7CIFOV7XZXS6EHUFYZF6H3NCN637PI2M.pdf",
"text": " \nPage 1 of 2 \n \n ACCEPTANCE TESTING (AT) \nTEST SITE GUIDELINES \nAcceptance Test (AT) Environment Guidelines \nThe Acceptance Test (AT) environment was established for the following \npurposes: \n• Acceptance/ Performance testing of forms and functionality prior to \nproduction releases \n• S2S testing by agencies and applicants \n \nAcceptance Testing environment : http://at07web.grants.gov/ \nPrimary Use \nThe primary use of AT is for the Gr ants.gov team to test changes to the \nGrants.gov system before deploying them into the production environment. \nTherefore, agencies and applican ts are asked to follow these guidelines so that \nthe AT environment is able to handle all of these activiti es without jeopardizing its \nprimary function as the Grants.gov inter nal test system. In addition, following \nthese guidelines will help ensure that agency and applic ant users of AT will be \nable to use the system in the most equitable manner possible. \nLoad Testing \nLoad testing is not permitted in the AT environment. The AT system is not built to \nhandle the volume of applications that pr oduction does. Please keep your daily \nnumber of submissions to a “reasonable” limited number that are of average-\nsized applications. \nPeak Usage Time \nPeak usage times of AT tend to be from Monday through Friday from 10:00 a.m. \nto 3:30 p.m. Eastern Time. Delays in processing times and unexpected \ndowntimes are more likely to occur during these times. Please plan your testing \naccordingly. \nReport a Potential Issue \nTo report a potential issues with A cceptance Testing environment, please \nsend an email to the Grants. gov Contact Center at support@grants.gov or call \n1-800-518-4726 and include the following information to expedite the \ninvestigation and resolution of the issue: \n• Description of issue \n• Tracking numbers \n• Opportunity numbers \n• Time issue occurred or was noticed \nPage 2 of 2 \n \n ACCEPTANCE TESTING (AT) \nTEST SITE GUIDELINES \n• Contact name, em ail, and phone number \n• Error messages or other informati on that might be helpful to the \nGrants.gov team in tro ubleshooting the issue \nAnnouncement of New System Builds \nGrants.gov will publish information about new system builds on AT in advance. \nHowever, please be aware that Grants. gov may need to deploy changes to the \nAT environment at any time, and this may result in unexpected downtimes or \ntemporary outages of ce rtain functionality. \nAdvance Notice \nPlease inform Grants.gov two-weeks in advance when you are planning to use \nthe AT system heavily for any extended per iod of time or when you are under a \ntight deadline. \nRestrictions of Use \nAs the use of AT grows, Grants.gov may fi nd it necessary to restrict the use of \nAT and schedule the use of AT by agencie s and applicants. However, to date, \nwe have had a great deal of cooperat ion regarding the use of the testing \ncompleted by both the applicant and agency community on AT. We wish for this \ntype of cooperation to continue so t hat everyone can take advantage of this \ntesting environment without Grants.gov placi ng restrictions on its use. Please be \nconsiderate of your fellow testers. \n \nBe advised that the production system is always the top priority for Grants.gov \nsupport. The Grants.gov team will handle issue reports in AT in a lower \npriority to those in production. Testi ng of any sort (i.e. application package \nsubmission) within the live Production environm ent is strictly prohibited. All S2S \nprivileges will be revoked for any certif icate associated with a test application \npackage in the Production environment. All testing for Grants.gov must be \ncompleted in the AT environment. \n "
} |
[
-0.04823048785328865,
0.0930057093501091,
-0.005275814328342676,
-0.04515211656689644,
0.04032247141003609,
0.09658057242631912,
-0.006179584190249443,
-0.027099424973130226,
-0.026832757517695427,
0.018695177510380745,
0.0752725601196289,
-0.005283483304083347,
-0.019642336294054985,
-0.00960761308670044,
0.032265618443489075,
-0.029590358957648277,
0.08385133743286133,
0.017077242955565453,
-0.09642169624567032,
0.08715106546878815,
0.05557509511709213,
0.14046037197113037,
-0.030815156176686287,
-0.011974619701504707,
-0.037982068955898285,
0.0004168194136582315,
-0.02892891690135002,
-0.08330038189888,
-0.0275278203189373,
0.007744886446744204,
0.015049721114337444,
-0.052495770156383514,
-0.004321195650845766,
0.030248820781707764,
0.053593941032886505,
-0.059605080634355545,
-0.015568036586046219,
0.005183456931263208,
-0.06460274755954742,
0.04329241067171097,
-0.09884683042764664,
-0.06462618708610535,
-0.009453118778765202,
-0.010539263486862183,
0.0049315160140395164,
0.02304687909781933,
0.023346152156591415,
-0.047125134617090225,
-0.06563444435596466,
0.023159096017479897,
0.02690756879746914,
-0.014086269773542881,
0.009931187145411968,
0.08478203415870667,
-0.009842702187597752,
-0.11273378133773804,
0.005103034432977438,
-0.032290268689394,
-0.08735385537147522,
0.013361561112105846,
-0.024283086881041527,
-0.029991965740919113,
0.0004370546666905284,
0.016419176012277603,
-0.026456886902451515,
0.028180129826068878,
0.06586787849664688,
-0.06563180685043335,
-0.026453517377376556,
-0.09472066909074783,
-0.10546864569187164,
0.05520708113908768,
0.0366581454873085,
0.054515011608600616,
0.05360905081033707,
0.0408150814473629,
-0.009179680608212948,
0.09632369875907898,
0.13953611254692078,
-0.136714905500412,
0.03601079061627388,
0.04550419747829437,
-0.003125692717730999,
0.01769336313009262,
-0.043606601655483246,
0.016689350828528404,
-0.04452457278966904,
-0.007005590014159679,
0.0629454180598259,
-0.021223193034529686,
0.04598388820886612,
-0.017163747921586037,
-0.02637154795229435,
-0.0011599101126194,
0.08669787645339966,
-0.07270868867635727,
-0.024804865941405296,
-0.04889620468020439,
-0.03219884634017944,
0.007229876238852739,
-0.026382166892290115,
0.01798708550632,
-0.006882334593683481,
0.015215074643492699,
0.008791298605501652,
0.06743449717760086,
0.03784586861729622,
0.0036469895858317614,
-0.015609714202582836,
0.03237338364124298,
0.021797139197587967,
0.051771558821201324,
0.002379652578383684,
-0.11988605558872223,
0.019573112949728966,
0.012159153819084167,
-0.0422167107462883,
-0.007295053452253342,
0.06095210462808609,
-0.07123798131942749,
-0.014665867201983929,
-0.07393988221883774,
0.04268786683678627,
0.0083385044708848,
0.01951880380511284,
-0.05665497109293938,
-0.023420603945851326,
4.878552450487997e-33,
0.029775382950901985,
0.06116749718785286,
-0.02623918280005455,
-0.019609181210398674,
0.018785519525408745,
0.010796161368489265,
-0.04965784773230553,
-0.07718351483345032,
-0.014605525881052017,
0.00762924226000905,
-0.0009788634488359094,
0.06860985606908798,
0.07503136247396469,
-0.002756004221737385,
0.036139003932476044,
0.05665595084428787,
0.023168794810771942,
0.08649389445781708,
0.04050036892294884,
-0.011903948150575161,
0.10269053280353546,
-0.05000384524464607,
0.029990430921316147,
0.016056086868047714,
0.009485814720392227,
0.03770948201417923,
-0.008415939286351204,
-0.05789385735988617,
-0.026509808376431465,
0.027053793892264366,
-0.019815580919384956,
0.06723027676343918,
0.08975800126791,
-0.039993442595005035,
0.06102418527007103,
0.02531684935092926,
-0.027117397636175156,
-0.004865096416324377,
0.012015053071081638,
-0.024741224944591522,
0.13146837055683136,
0.0449456125497818,
0.041917912662029266,
-0.03700868785381317,
-0.02484518475830555,
-0.012835685163736343,
-0.028328601270914078,
0.03323610872030258,
0.022519426420331,
0.06581377983093262,
-0.022747132927179337,
0.040884509682655334,
-0.11686306446790695,
-0.04753612354397774,
-0.010862487368285656,
-0.026629209518432617,
-0.015846075490117073,
-0.0013881822815164924,
-0.016492284834384918,
0.005838233511894941,
0.014066996984183788,
0.0483248196542263,
0.014006693847477436,
-0.017705798149108887,
-0.07739149034023285,
-0.12163600325584412,
-0.042399823665618896,
-0.08177993446588516,
0.035650644451379776,
-0.06512079387903214,
-0.04069992154836655,
0.06913341581821442,
-0.02955153025686741,
-0.11010074615478516,
-0.0367816723883152,
-0.05170970782637596,
0.0785866230726242,
0.02740315906703472,
0.03570745885372162,
-0.08152635395526886,
-0.049442507326602936,
0.011074787005782127,
-0.013973885215818882,
0.0004736719711218029,
-0.0558902770280838,
-0.014618374407291412,
-0.017559180036187172,
0.051522642374038696,
-0.04982388764619827,
-0.05123317614197731,
0.011854270473122597,
0.009296128526329994,
0.0515625886619091,
-0.0015181242488324642,
0.019000360742211342,
-6.670267021292236e-33,
-0.04912104457616806,
-0.009627022780478,
-0.053042180836200714,
-0.043869148939847946,
0.06742643564939499,
0.008210903964936733,
0.0330989733338356,
-0.009442188777029514,
-0.01142373401671648,
-0.02992831915616989,
-0.023727620020508766,
-0.002667294815182686,
-0.013857417739927769,
0.014108767732977867,
0.018048113211989403,
0.11345291882753372,
0.012540344148874283,
-0.062143176794052124,
-0.02883920818567276,
0.02390468865633011,
0.030733950436115265,
0.018179873004555702,
-0.015349449589848518,
0.10685117542743683,
0.0725184828042984,
-0.018969083204865456,
-0.03449806571006775,
0.01708209700882435,
0.06846952438354492,
-0.02629019133746624,
-0.016116740182042122,
-0.02325262688100338,
-0.09290167689323425,
0.04499605670571327,
0.011191079393029213,
-0.10421673208475113,
0.05793825536966324,
0.021090418100357056,
-0.009801531210541725,
0.043305348604917526,
0.06610307842493057,
0.04420606046915054,
-0.12029769271612167,
0.01372674573212862,
-0.03244670107960701,
0.014417069032788277,
-0.03796742483973503,
-0.009015657939016819,
-0.05715571343898773,
-0.017788849771022797,
0.07721462100744247,
-0.06308559328317642,
0.04737577214837074,
0.03253595530986786,
-0.05375722423195839,
0.07490741461515427,
0.053598370403051376,
-0.0112458486109972,
-0.010727033019065857,
-0.015167443081736565,
0.06101325899362564,
0.08941515535116196,
-0.07679042220115662,
0.011797960847616196,
0.010741399601101875,
-0.028116347268223763,
-0.011187088675796986,
-0.005009302869439125,
-0.00784351211041212,
-0.06758473068475723,
-0.05947526916861534,
-0.16427567601203918,
-0.08265011012554169,
-0.10601776838302612,
0.04986124485731125,
-0.08915255963802338,
0.05931460112333298,
-0.06903362274169922,
-0.09136161208152771,
0.1029989942908287,
0.047567207366228104,
-0.018877357244491577,
-0.007511210162192583,
-0.026882847771048546,
0.031869713217020035,
0.002507772296667099,
0.0619250163435936,
-0.04717592895030975,
-0.01283378154039383,
0.07904039323329926,
-0.08118705451488495,
-0.023843079805374146,
-0.05354676395654678,
0.025561777874827385,
-0.012426191009581089,
-4.989714597058992e-8,
0.00908286776393652,
-0.047913502901792526,
0.012390139512717724,
0.03844837471842766,
-0.007970213890075684,
-0.025862883776426315,
0.02915593981742859,
0.01232093945145607,
-0.0612637996673584,
0.049295030534267426,
0.06414586305618286,
0.039412468671798706,
-0.025210579857230186,
-0.005399336572736502,
0.07675889134407043,
0.057642269879579544,
-0.08125453442335129,
-0.02391763962805271,
-0.015549033880233765,
0.05032783001661301,
-0.08095216751098633,
-0.04124012589454651,
-0.03941847011446953,
-0.025219568982720375,
-0.01747545599937439,
0.04510718956589699,
0.009960692375898361,
-0.04636157304048538,
0.07725824415683746,
0.07558390498161316,
0.033398158848285675,
0.04265037551522255,
-0.007064821198582649,
-0.020963698625564575,
-0.1521669626235962,
0.00029091068427078426,
0.032625164836645126,
-0.03419014438986778,
0.016865521669387817,
0.00276196445338428,
0.0341508686542511,
0.02145206928253174,
0.08276618272066116,
0.04035172238945961,
0.03318868950009346,
0.006794121116399765,
0.027863604947924614,
-0.13989460468292236,
0.018060345202684402,
-0.06592582166194916,
-0.0682857558131218,
-0.0006899260333739221,
0.03991895541548729,
0.09716206789016724,
-0.0635586827993393,
0.02302837371826172,
0.053426165133714676,
0.024254674091935158,
0.0322863943874836,
-0.007090410683304071,
0.09357671439647675,
0.03656651824712753,
0.020082630217075348,
0.005666340701282024
] | {
"pdf_file": "CZOP2ITFIK5GAH4SD3GJI755X7QFUHM3.pdf",
"text": "Department of Veterans Affairs VHA DIRE CTIVE 16 05 \nVeterans Health Administration Transmitta l Sheet \nWashington, DC 20420 March 17, 2005 \n \nVHA PRIVACY P ROGRAM \n \n1. REASO N FOR ISS UE. This Veterans Health Ad ministration (VHA) Directive establishes \na VHA-wid e program for the protection of the privacy of veterans, their dependents, and \nbeneficiaries in acco rdance with Federal privacy s tatutes and regulations, as well as establish es \nprivacy policies to com ply with the Departm ent of Veterans Affairs (VA) Directive 6502. \n \n2. SUMMARY OF CONTENTS/MAJOR CHANGES. This VHA Directive sets forth: \n \n a. Policy for the VHA Privacy Program . This policy requires VA-wide compliance with all \napplic able p rivacy laws, regula tions, Executive Orders and implem entation policies, guidance, \ndirectives, and handbooks. \n \n b. Provision of the Freed om of Information Act, Privacy Act, Title 38 Un ited States C ode \n(U.S.C.) (U.S.C. Sections 5701, 5705, 7332), and Standard of Privacy of Individually-\nIdentifiable Health Inform ation, 45 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 160 and 164, hence \nHealth Insu rance Portability and Acc ountability Act (HIPAA) Privacy Ru le. \n \n c. Responsibilities for implem enting and m anaging the VHA-wide Privacy Program ; and \n \n d. References related to the VHA Privacy Program. \n \n3. RELATED HANDBOOKS . VHA Handbo ok 1605.1 and VHA Handbook 1605.2. \n \n4. RESPO NSIBLE OFFICE. The VHA Office of Health Da ta and Infor matics (19F) is \nresponsible for the contents of this D irective. Questions m ay be referred to the VHA Privacy \nOfficer at 727-320-1839. \n \n5. RESCI SSIONS . None. \n \n6. RECERTIFICATI ON. This VHA Directive is scheduled fo r recertif ication on or before the \nlast day of March 2010. \n \n \n \n S/ Jonathan Perlin, MD, PhD, MSHA, FACP \n Acting Under Secretary for Health \n \nDISTRIBUTION: CO: E-mailed 3/22/2005 \n FLD: VISN, MA, DO, OC, OCRO , and 200 – E-m ailed 3/22/2005 \n \n \n \nT-1 March 17, 2005 VHA DIRECTIVE 1605 \n \n \n1 \nVHA PRIVACY PROGRAM \n \n1. PURPOSE: This VHA Directive provides policy a nd responsibilities for the VHA Privacy \nProgram; and covers the respons ibilities and requirements for compliance with all Federal \nconfidentiality laws and regulations. \n \n2. BACKGROUND: The VHA Privacy Program applies to: \n \n a. Personal data that identifies an individual (herein referred to as “i ndividually-identifiable \ninformation”) that is collected, created, transmitte d, used, processed, stored, or disposed of by or \nfor VHA; and \n \n b. VHA components pertaining to all individually-identifia ble information, which is \nmaintained in any medium, including hard copy, microfilm, and electronic format and by \ninformation systems administrated by, or otherwise under the authority or control of, the \nDepartment of Vete rans Affairs (VA). \n \n3. POLICY: It is VHA policy that a VHA-wide Privacy Program be implemented through the VHA Privacy Office in the Office of Health Data and Informatics. \n \n4. RESPONSIBILITIES \n \n a. VHA Chief Health Informatics Officer (CHIO). The VHA CHIO is responsible for: \n \n (1) Ensuring that Department-wide privacy policies and proce dures are implemented \nthrough the VHA Privacy Program; and \n \n (2) Seeking technical guidance and requirements for the protection of all privacy–protected \ndata from the VA Privacy Service for the de velopment and approval of cyber security \nacquisitions, budgeting, and funding. \n \n b. VHA Privacy Officer. The VHA Privacy Officer is responsible for: \n \n (1) Performing all privacy duties and responsibilities as designated by the VA Privacy \nService and VHA CHIO; \n \n (2) Developing and implementing a VHA Privacy Program; \n \n (3) Developing, issuing, revi ewing, and coordinating privacy policy for VHA in conjunction \nwith policy efforts by VA; \n \n (4) Coordinating requirements and monitoring compliance with all Federal privacy law, regulations, and guidance with VHA; \n \n (5) Issuing direction to fac ility-level Privacy Of ficers regarding all as pects of implementing \nthe VHA Privacy Program; VHA DIRECTIVE 1605 March 17, 2005 \n \n \n2 \n (6) Establishing requirements for the responsib ilities of facility-level Privacy Officers and \nproviding implementation guidance, as needed; \n \n (7) Providing VHA-specific pr ivacy training tools and period ically monitoring compliance \nwith the annual training requirement; \n \n (8) Examining new or pending legislation, in conjunction with the Office of General \nCounsel, to determine the actual or potential impact of such legi slation on privacy policy and/or \npractice at VHA; \n \n (9) Establishing VHA policy on the reporti ng, tracking, resolution, and auditing of VHA \nprivacy violations and complaints; \n \n (10) Ensuring VHA resolves all privacy breach es in a timely fashion and in accordance with \napplicable law; \n \n (11) Reporting all actual or suspected breach es of privacy of individually-identifiable \ninformation observed or received at the national level to the tracking se rvice designated by the \nVA Privacy Service; \n \n (12) Coordinating investigation of and response to privacy complaints received from the \nDepartment of Health and Human Se rvices, Office of Civil Rights; \n \n (13) Maintaining a Noti ce of Privacy Practices; and \n \n (14) Providing expert guidance to the field in regard to the Privacy Act, Title 38 United \nStates Code (U.S.C.) Sections 5701 and 7332, Hea lth Insurance Portability and Accountability \nAct (HIPAA) Privacy Rule, and other applicable Federal privacy laws. \n \n c. Veterans Integrated Service Network (VIS N) Director and Chief Program Officers. \nThe VISN Directors and Chief Progr am Officers are responsible for: \n \n (1) Ensuring compliance within their respecti ve programs with all Federal laws, regulations, \nVA regulation and policies, and VHA policies relating to privacy; \n \n (2) Ensuring that all personnel within their respective programs attend annual privacy \ntraining in accordance with applicab le requirements and VHA privacy policy; \n \n (3) Ensuring that all personnel within th eir respective programs attend privacy training \nbefore they are granted access to any individual ly–identifiable information, and that personnel \nreceive the follow-up privacy training periodically; \n \n (4) Implementing the requirements of the VHA Privacy Program; and \n \n (5) Designating an individual to provide guidance and oversight to ensure compliance with \nprivacy regulations for th eir respective programs. March 17, 2005 VHA DIRECTIVE 1605 \n \n \n3 \n d. Medical Center Director. The Medical Center Director is responsible for: \n \n (1) Ensuring there is a Priv acy Officer at the facility; and \n \n (2) Ensuring facility policies and procedures consistent with polices contained in this \nDirective are established and distributed to all employees. \n \n e. Privacy Officer. The Privacy Officer is assigned responsibility for: \n \n (1) Developing facility privacy policies c onsistent with national privacy policies and \nmonitoring compliance with such privacy policies; \n \n (2) Reviewing or auditing all programs at the facility on a periodic ba sis to determine which \nprograms collect, maintain, and store individually -identifiable information in order to ensure \ncompliance with facil ity privacy policies; \n \n (3) Reporting, in a timely manner, all actual or suspected breaches of privacy of all \nindividually-identifiable information to the tracking service designated by the VA Privacy \nService; and \n \n (4) Providing expert guidance to the facility on all privacy re lated matters such as Privacy \nAct (PA), Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), HIPAA and 38 U.S.C. \n \n f. VHA Personnel . All VHA personnel are responsible for: \n \n (1) Complying with all Fede ral laws and regulations, VA re gulations and policies, and VHA \npolicies relating to privacy; \n \n (2) Completing privacy training at the time of employment, annually thereafter, and within 6 \nmonths of a significant change in Federal law and regulation or VHA privacy policy; \n \n (3) Reporting all actual or suspected breaches of privacy in a timely and complete manner to \nthe appropriate privacy official; and \n \n (4) Using, disclosing, or requesting individua lly-identifiable information to the minimum \namount necessary required to perform their specifi c job function and to accomplish the intended \npurpose of the use, disclosure, or request. \n \n5. REFERENCES \n \n a. Title 38 U.S.C. 5701. \n \n b. Title 38 U.S.C. 5705. \n \n c. Title 38 U.S.C. 7332. \n VHA DIRECTIVE 1605 March 17, 2005 \n \n \n4 d. Title 38 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §§1.500-527. \n \n e. Title 38 CFR §§17.500-511. \n \n f. Title 38 CFR §§1.460-496. \n \n g. Title 38 CFR §§1.550-557. \n \n h. Title 38 CFR §§1.575-582. \n \n i. Title 45 CFR, Parts 160 and 164. \n \n j. Public Law 104-191. \n \n k. Office of Management and Budge t (OMB) Circular A-130, Appendix I. \n \n l. VA Directive 6502 \n \n6. DEFINITIONS \n \n a. Compliance . For the purpose of this Directive, the term “compliance” means the act of \ncomplying with policies, procedures, directiv es, laws, and other legal guidance. \n \n b. Individually-Identifiable Information . Individually-identifiable information is any \ninformation, including health in formation maintained by VHA, pertaining to an individual that \nalso identifies the individual a nd, except for individually-identif iable health information, is \nretrieved by the individual’s name or other unique identifier. Individually-iden tifiable health \ninformation is covered regardless of whether or not the information is retrieved by name. \n \n c. Personnel . For the purpose of this Directive, the term “personnel” includes those \nofficers and employees of the Department; c onsultants and attending clinicians; without \ncompensation (WOC) employees; contractors; othe rs employed on a fee basis; medical students \nand other trainees; and volunteer workers rend ering uncompensated services, excluding patient \nvolunteers, providing a service at the direction of VA staff. NOTE: Compensated Work \nTherapy (CWT) workers are not VHA personnel; th ey are patients receiving active treatment or \ntherapy. \n \n d. VHA Privacy Program. The VHA Privacy Program is the effort within VHA to \nestablish and implement privacy policies and prac tices that comply with the requirements of all \napplicable Federal privacy laws and regulations, VA regulations and VA privacy policies. The \nVHA Privacy Program at a minimum should address privacy policies, priv acy training, use and \ndisclosure of information, individual’s privacy right s, privacy complaints, notice of privacy \npractices and privacy compliance monitoring. \n "
} |