sentence
stringlengths
2
568
label
class label
3 classes
idx
int32
0
5.71k
"my doctor explained that the protein that i'm allergic to is broken down in the ""oil"" form,"
0experiential
100
so foods cooked in peanut oil do not bother me.
1unverifiable
101
i think there should be no caps on amount airlines have to pay.
1unverifiable
102
i agree with the proposed required customer service rules.
1unverifiable
103
full prices should be fully disclosed up front,
1unverifiable
104
and the lowest price available should be disclosed.
1unverifiable
105
prices should not be increased after purchase.
1unverifiable
106
dot should extend the tarmac delay rules to all flights in the us
1unverifiable
107
on a recent trip from wa state to michigan, every single flight was late by at least a half hour, resulting in missed connections both ways.
0experiential
108
air travel has turned into such a frustrating exercise that we look for reasons not to go air.
1unverifiable
109
anything else whose risks of fatal reaction outweigh the mere convenience of the ignorant, i hope.
1unverifiable
110
ricport, everyone is responsible for themselves and their effects on others.
1unverifiable
111
airlines are not public spaces. if airlines ban peanuts, many passengers will bring their own peanuts on board ... as airlines cannot stop people from bringing their own snacks.
1unverifiable
112
i am sympathetic to people with allergies,
1unverifiable
113
but people with allergies need to be prepared with their medicine and then need to stop trying to impose their need on the 99% of the healthy population.
1unverifiable
114
* 30 minutes is too long;
1unverifiable
115
so set the beginning info as 15 minutes with 30 minute updates unless a resolution is known sooner.
1unverifiable
116
* specify notification be by all methods available at the airport involved, including ticket agents, with the customer additionally specifying how they are to be notified at home; email, phone, fax.
1unverifiable
117
* all commercial flights should be included.
1unverifiable
118
don't forget the obvious reasons they don't do better; no enlightened effective regulation; executive compensation; union rules; airport and faa inefficiencies; monopoly status ; ultimately the bottom line .
1unverifiable
119
let's look at this logically:
1unverifiable
120
the airline knows when they sell a ticket;
2non-experiential
121
they know when they have sold the full number.
2non-experiential
122
those passengers should be guaranteed a seat; no excuses.
1unverifiable
123
any subsequent tickets sold should be sold as standby with a ranking 1-n, first come; first served!
1unverifiable
124
problem solved.
1unverifiable
125
* first ask for volunteers to receive the next available comparable or better seat on the airline or any other airline, the airline agents to make the arrangements and pay for the seat directly, the passenger to be reimbursed in cash or credit card for their anticipated out of pocket costs due to the delay and their total out of pocket flight costs, tickets, baggage checks, any other fees.
1unverifiable
126
if points were used they would be reinstated with new expiration dates.
1unverifiable
127
* do a lottery, no limits, with at least the results in 1., above, cash or credit cards only;
1unverifiable
128
no vouchers,
1unverifiable
129
* if they still bump someone the sky should be the limit, the results to be appropriate booking plus at least double the payout in 2., above.
1unverifiable
130
of course airline lawyers would attempt to make it five pages of weasel words.
1unverifiable
131
disclosure, disclosure, disclosure!
1unverifiable
132
not just the ticket price but also the agent's fee,
1unverifiable
133
which sometimes is considerable.
1unverifiable
134
and yes! they should not be able to raise the quoted price.
1unverifiable
135
it makes no sense and is misleading to quote a one way price if i have to buy a roundtrip ticket.
1unverifiable
136
"if the itemization is boston to bombay fare, then various fees, then bombay to boston fare and various fees, it is still misleading unless it is specifically preceded by ""round trip required"""
1unverifiable
137
this whole process of additional regulation is brought about because of lack of disclosure by airlines and agents when they unbundle services and initiate obscene fees for them so that we buy tickets and still don't have a deal because we may still be hit by additional fees at checkin.
1unverifiable
138
a deal should be a deal!
1unverifiable
139
of course not.
1unverifiable
140
i think we should always be talking about airlines, travel agents, and other resellers.
1unverifiable
141
i think the smaller typeface is a bad idea.
1unverifiable
142
small type is always used for something the purveyor has to say but doesn't want us to be able to read, and we usually can't.
1unverifiable
143
no! retroactive pricing is essentially fraud and violates the contract made when money changes hands.
1unverifiable
144
i would favor a rule that disallowed even having a round trip requirement for prices.
1unverifiable
145
if an airline wants to give a credit for roundtrip like stores give case discounts on groceries or such, and listed it as a separate credit in their advertising and on their ticket that might work.
1unverifiable
146
fares from boston to new york might vary by time of day and by day of the week
1unverifiable
147
but they should never be based on round trip required.
1unverifiable
148
this is the same as bumping and should be compensated as such.
1unverifiable
149
see my comments under that category.
1unverifiable
150
it is not just the five hours,
1unverifiable
151
though that is bad enough;
1unverifiable
152
it is all the other inconveniences, arriving late at night, having to cancel engagements, having to call a cab for a long ride vs bus transportation, and a myriad other inconveniences for which the airlines in their hubris currently accepts no responsibility.
1unverifiable
153
the price of fuel doesn't change while i am trying to book a flight.
1unverifiable
154
maybe airlines should only be allowed to change prices once a week, or once a day, always at midnight, or something like that.
1unverifiable
155
"it is extremely frustrating to try to buy a ticket and have availability and or or price change while you are pushing the ""buy"" button."
1unverifiable
156
since all these airlines are still split on what services call for fees and how much those services actually cost, they need to create a standard for every airline to use as a basis for quoting prices.
1unverifiable
157
"go back a few years to what was considered ""standard"", and have them quote on: - rt airfare- 1 checked bag- advance seat selection- beverage service- taxes and fees"
1unverifiable
158
from there, passengers can unbundle as necessary or add things like premium seating and 2nd or 3rd checked bags .
1unverifiable
159
* although perhaps an improvement over current procedures, this will only help a portion of peanut or nut allergic people, and mostly likely won't help severely allergic individuals.
1unverifiable
160
* airborne peanut or nut proteins can cause anaphylactic reactions faster than surface-bound peanut or nut proteins;
2non-experiential
161
the recycled air in the plane exacerbates this problem.
2non-experiential
162
* every surface could still be contaminated, even if you wipe down your seats; for example, touching any other arm rest, using lavatory doors, toilets, sinks, and surfaces right after someone else who was eating peanuts or nuts.
2non-experiential
163
* there would simply still be too many risks.
1unverifiable
164
* again, better than current procedures, and better than a buffer zone, but still a problem.
1unverifiable
165
a peanut or nut allergic individual would likely be walking onto a plane that was not peanut or nut free 30 minutes prior;
2non-experiential
166
and although some cleaning of the cabins occurs between flights,
2non-experiential
167
many of the same issues mentioned above would still exist.
2non-experiential
168
* most people don't understand and or or are not tolerant of peanut or nut allergy, purely out of lack of knowledge of its severity
1unverifiable
169
prior to having a son diagnosed with peanut or nut and soy allergies i didn't know what it entailed either;
1unverifiable
170
"* this has the potential to single out the peanut or nut allergic ""offender"" ."
1unverifiable
171
* the only viable solution to make air travel routinely safe for everyone.
1unverifiable
172
* although there may still be risks of passengers violating the policy,
1unverifiable
173
this resolves all of the issues mentioned above.
2non-experiential
174
the surfaces of and air inside the plane would be safe,
1unverifiable
175
all travelers would know what to expect,
1unverifiable
176
no one would know who was or wasn't peanut or nut allergic.
1unverifiable
177
* airlines have nothing to lose by instituting a full ban;
1unverifiable
178
they only have customers to gain.
1unverifiable
179
like with any changes in air travel policy, if such a ban is universally instituted, everyone will have to accept it,
1unverifiable
180
and it will not prevent people from continuing to fly.
1unverifiable
181
however, what will happen is that a large and continuously growing part of the customer market that currently cannot or will not fly, will buy tickets knowing that air travel can be safe.
1unverifiable
182
* bear in mind the severity of a situation where a peanut or nut allergic individual goes into anaphylactic shock mid-air.
1unverifiable
183
in some cases, benadryl and an epipen will resolve the reaction for an amount of time.
2non-experiential
184
however, in many cases these measures merely buy you enough time to get to an emergency room, typically 10 to 15 minutes;
2non-experiential
185
which would not be possible when in mid-air.
1unverifiable
186
they are not sufficient, assuming that the goal here is to make air travel safe for everyone.
1unverifiable
187
i don't think that flights of less than 60 should be covered:
1unverifiable
188
in general passengers on these smaller aircraft get more personal service and it would be less cumbersome to deplane passengers if needed.
1unverifiable
189
where a plane is at the gate and the aircraft door has not yet been closed, passengers should be permitted to deplane after, say, 1 hour.
1unverifiable
190
in addition, passengers should be able to deplane if the plane has returned to the gate and the delay is over 1 hour.
1unverifiable
191
in relation to deplaning delayed or diverted international passengers, i recall facing exactly the same issue when traveling trans-pacific and transiting hawaii.
0experiential
192
we were always able to deplane in hawaii as long as we remained within a certain area of the airport.
0experiential
193
at least we were able to stretch our legs and use the bathroom facilities in the airport.
0experiential
194
i agree with dot's proposals on clarifying bumping rules and adequately compensating those involuntarily bumped.
1unverifiable
195
passengers who are voluntarily or involutarily bumped should be advised by the gate agents on the cash or check or travel voucher option and the criteria for involuntary bumping prioritization.
1unverifiable
196
on compensation, i think the actual ticket amount, plus a small premium to cover the unbundled aspects of the costs associated with the trip would suffice.
1unverifiable
197
given that these smaller aircraft service less popular routes , oversales should be prohibited,
1unverifiable
198
"but the airlines should allow a few passengers to be on ""stand by"" in the event of a no show."
1unverifiable
199