ID stringlengths 4 7 | para_id int64 0 26 | newJudgement stringlengths 0 34.1k |
|---|---|---|
id_122 | 1 | Although initially a person could change their jati, as per historians around 500 B.C., the jati system became more rigid. Persons born into a particular jati remained in that jati till their death. This ensured that those in the upper echelons of the caste system maintained systemic advantages for their descendants. T... |
id_122 | 2 | The exclusion of backward classes from the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) category, if sought to be justified solely on the ground that the economically backward within these groups have access to reservation because of their educational and social backwardness, will only mean that the entire concept of reservation... |
id_1220 | 0 | Krishnamoorthy is the petitioner. The first respondent is the Inspector of Police, M. Reddiyapatti Police Station, Virudhunagar District, Crime No. 48 of 2022. The second respondent is Sunitha, impleaded as per the order of the Madras High Court dated 28 June 2022 in Criminal Magistrate (M.D.) No. 7063 of 2022. The pra... |
id_1221 | 0 | Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2510 of 2019 Bhuvaneswari (Appellant) vs. The United India Insurance Company Ltd., 104-A, Ranga Building, Peramanur Main Road, Four Road, Salem-636 103 (Respondents). The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is preferred under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and de... |
id_1223 | 0 | Reportable Writ Petition (Civil) No. 607 of 2021 Versus The petitioner was a member of the National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization (NTAGI) and was advising the Government of India on vaccines. He has filed this writ petition in public interest seeking the following reliefs: (a) direct the respondents to relea... |
id_1223 | 1 | He referred to an order passed by the Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi on 08 October 2021 by which government employees, including frontline workers and healthcare workers, as well as teachers and staff working in schools and colleges, were not to be allowed to attend their respective offices and i... |
id_1223 | 2 | The NZ High Court referred to an earlier judgment in Four Aviation Security Service Employees v. Minister of COVID-19 Response, where the precautionary principle had been applied, to make the point that even a modest vaccination protection on a modest number of personnel needs to be considered in the context of potenti... |
id_1223 | 3 | The Scientific Evaluation Committee (SEC) is a statutory body constituted by the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization (CDSCO) under Rule 100 of the 2019 Rules, comprising a group of experts with specialisation in relevant fields. According to the Union of India, the SEC examines the details of trials and results... |
id_1223 | 4 | It was submitted on behalf of the Union of India that case details, scanned copies of reports are uploaded on SAFEVAC, which also has facilities for generating dashboards and line‑lists at different levels. Further, a similar feature of reporting of all Adverse Events Following Immunisation (including minor) by the vac... |
id_1225 | 0 | % Reserved on: 22.01.2024 Pronounced on: 24.01.2024 Petitioner Through: Mr. Mahesh Chand, Advocate versus Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, Additional Sessions Judge for the State. Mr. Puneet Bajaj, Advocate for complainant., The bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed by the ap... |
id_1226 | 0 | Through: Mr. Pawan Kumar, Advocate, versus Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State with SI Saurabh, Police Station Malviya Nagar, Mr. K.K. Manan and Mr. Mohit Mathur, Senior Advocates with Ms. Uditi Bali and Mr. Anil Basoya, Advocates for the complainant. The instant application under Section... |
id_1227 | 0 | Through: Mr. KS Choudhary, Advocate versus Through: Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, Appellant Mr. Shilankar Shakya, Advocate for R -2-4 Sub-Inspector Satyapreet, Police Station Jaitpur., This is a petition filed seeking quashing of the FIR No. 416/2017 dated 12.08.2017 registered at Police Station Jaitpur under Sections 323, 50... |
id_1229 | 0 | Date of decision: 22nd January, 2024. W.P.(C) 13213/2022 & CM Applications 39980/2022, 43537/2022. Through: Mr. Kapil Sibal, Senior Advocate and Mr. Arunabh Chowdhury, Senior Advocate with Mr. Krishnaraj Thaker, Ms. Pragya Baghel, Mr. Vaibhav Tomar and Ms. Aparajita Jamwal, Advocates. Versus Through: Mr. Tushar Mehta, ... |
id_1229 | 1 | In case the Lokpal decides to proceed to investigate into the complaint, it shall direct any agency (including the Delhi Special Police Establishment) to carry out the investigation as expeditiously as possible and complete the investigation within a period of six months from the date of its order: Provided that the Lo... |
id_123 | 0 | Reportable Writ Petition (Civil) No 1224 of 2023 State of Punjab Petitioner Versus Principal Secretary to the Governor Respondents of Punjab and Another Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Chief Justice of India, Table of Contents A. The Governor is a symbolic head and cannot withhold action on Bills passed B. Reconvening a s... |
id_123 | 1 | Where there are two Houses of the Legislature of a State, one shall be known as the Legislative Council and the other as the Legislative Assembly, and where there is only one House, it shall be known as the Legislative Assembly. In any event, as delineated below, it was legally permissible for the Speaker to reconvene ... |
id_1230 | 0 | Case Number HRFB02005709-2023, Case Information System Number C S/3874/2023. Present: Sh. Vineet M. Bajaj, Yash Singhal, Aditya Vardhan and Karan Bansal, Advocates for applicant/plaintiffs No.1 and No.2. Defendant No.1: Sh. Jitender Datta Parashar, Advocate for defendant No.2., By this order I shall dispose of an appli... |
id_1232 | 0 | High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow) Reserved Petitioner: Suo-Moto Inre Right To Decent And Dignified Last Rites/Cremation Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh through Additional Chief Secretary Home and Others. Counsel for Petitioner: Abhinav Bhattacharya, Ajit Singh, Anjani Kumar Mishra, Ashish Kumar Agarwal... |
id_1232 | 1 | It is an Act to prevent the commission of offences of atrocities against the members of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes, to provide for Special Courts and Exclusive Special Courts for the trial of such offences and for the relief and rehabilitation of the victims of such offences and for matters connected... |
id_1232 | 2 | In addition to relief amounts paid under the above items, relief may be arranged within three months of the date of atrocity as follows: Basic Pension to the widow or other dependents of deceased persons belonging to a Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe amounting to five thousand rupees per month, as applicable to a ... |
id_1232 | 3 | It has already been noticed earlier that the family wants to live together and feels insecure because of the nature of the incident alleged to have taken place leading to the death of a family member and also because of the demography of the village. The affidavit of the State dated 29 March 2022 clearly mentions in pa... |
id_1233 | 0 | Anil Vasantrao Deshmukh aged 73 years, occupation Politician, an adult, Indian inhabitant, having his place of residence at Dnyaneshwar Bungalow, Malabar Hill, Mumbai 400006 (Accused is in Arthur Road Jail, Mumbai). Applicant versus State of Maharashtra at the instance of Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement,... |
id_1233 | 1 | Conversely, it is not peremptory that the Supreme Court of India must arrive at a positive finding that the Applicant has not committed an offence under the Act. Likewise, a satisfaction that the accused is not likely to commit an offence while on bail is qua the offence of the kind with which the accused is charged an... |
id_1233 | 2 | Param Bir Singh, on his part, stated that Mr. Sachin Waze had briefed him about the expectation of the Applicant of collection of Rs.100 Crores including Rs.40-50 Crores from restaurants and bars, in the second half of February, 2021 and he had advised him not to succumb to the pressure and not to indulge in such illeg... |
id_1234 | 0 | Item No. 3 19 October 2020 (Video Conference) Writ Petition (Civil) Application 8520 of 2020 Ajay Kumar De v. The State of West Bengal & Ors. Petitioners: Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharyya, Sabyasachi Chatterjee for the petitioner. Respondents: Kishore Dutta, Ld Sayan Sinha for the State. The matter pertains to the bandobast... |
id_1236 | 0 | Serial No. 01 Regular List Public Interest Litigation No. 6/2021 Date of Order: 23 June 2021 Registrar General versus State of Meghalaya High Court of Meghalaya Coram: Honorable Mr. Justice Biswanath Somadder, Chief Justice Honorable Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s): Mr. A... |
id_1238 | 0 | Shailaja / Uday Jagtap Venugopal Nandlal Dhoot, lodged at Arthur Road Jail, is the petitioner. The Central Bureau of Investigation, Banking Securities and Fraud Branch, is respondent 1. The State of Maharashtra is respondent 2. Mr. Sandeep S. Ladda, along with Ishani Khanwilkar, Viral Babar, Adnan A. Ansari, Adesh Jadh... |
id_1238 | 1 | Failure to comply with the directions aforesaid shall, apart from rendering the police officers concerned liable for departmental action, also make them liable to be punished for contempt of court to be instituted before the High Court having territorial jurisdiction. Authorising detention without recording reasons as ... |
id_1238 | 2 | After his arrest when the petitioner was first produced before the Sessions Court, Mumbai (Court No.53) on 26 December 2022, the learned Judge, after considering the submissions made by the Investigating Officer and the counsel for the petitioner, recorded his satisfaction and observed: I have heard both the sides and ... |
id_1240 | 0 | This appeal is at the instance of the Union of India and others being the unsuccessful respondents before the Gauhati High Court and is directed against the judgement and order dated 15 May 2019 passed by the Gauhati High Court in Writ Petition (C) No. 7876 of 2015 by which the High Court allowed the writ petition file... |
id_1240 | 1 | The order imposing penalty passed by the Disciplinary Authority reads thus: Date 05.01.2016. WHEREAS, a complaint of sexual harassment at workplace was made by Smt. X, Female Assistant (Lady) vide her complaint dated 30.08.2011 against Shri Dilip Paul, Area Organiser who had superannuated from government service on 31.... |
id_1240 | 2 | The requirement that the officer be formally asked whether he pleads guilty or not, according to the understanding of the Honourable High Court, is not merely an opportunity for the officer to answer in a monosyllable. The Honourable High Court held that to give meaning to the word 'formally', a real and effective oppo... |
id_1240 | 3 | In addition to the amendments in the Central Civil Services Rules, the Standing Order No. 1 of 2006 (Grievances Redressal Mechanism: To Redress Grievances of Women/Sexual Harassment at Workplace) was issued by the Directorate General, Sashastra Seema Bal, New Delhi, delineating the entire framework and procedure of the... |
id_1240 | 4 | The use of the words Any person aggrieved shall prefer a complaint before the Complaints Committee at the earliest point of time connotes two pertinent aspects; first, that the word prefer stipulates that the said provision is an enabling provision that permits a person from making a complaint of sexual harassment dire... |
id_1240 | 5 | The Supreme Court of India should not mechanically set aside the order of punishment on the ground that the report was not furnished as is regrettably being done at present. Applying the aforesaid dictum as laid by this Court, no prejudice could be said to have been caused to the respondent even if we believe that he w... |
id_1240 | 6 | In fact, what has been deposed by Mast Ram Thakur as referred above, has not even been remotely disputed in the cross‑examination by way of even a suggestion., Shri Rynjan Singh, peon (Petitioner Witness 8) and Shri Chandan Sarkar (Petitioner Witness 6) stated that they had seen the complainant being made to sit in the... |
id_1241 | 0 | Through: Mr. Raghav Awasthi, Mr. Mukesh Sharma and Mr. Kunal Tiwari, Advocates for plaintiffs No.1 and 2; Mr. Percival Billimoria, Senior Advocate with Mr. Mukesh Sharma, Mr. Archit Singh and Ms. Rachita Sood, Advocates for plaintiff No.3 versus Through: Mr. Naman Joshi, Mr. Guneet Sidhu, Mr. Yuvraj Francis and Mr. Zah... |
id_1242 | 0 | Reportable Criminal Appeal Nos 3051-3052 of 2023 (Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Nos. 9220-21 of 2023) Pankaj Bansal Appellant versus Union of India and others Respondents. Criminal Appeal Nos 3053-3054 of 2023 (Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Nos. 9275-76 of 2023). Leave granted., The challenge in these appeals i... |
id_1242 | 1 | While they were there, Pankaj Bansal was served with summons at 04.52 pm, requiring him to appear before another Investigating Officer at 05.00 pm in relation to the second Enforcement Case Information Report. As already noted, there is ambiguity as to when Basant Bansal was served with such summons. It is the case of ... |
id_1244 | 0 | Leave was granted. This appeal arises out of the judgment of a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court dated 15 July 2022. The appellant invoked the writ jurisdiction of the Delhi High Court seeking permission to terminate her pregnancy before the completion of twenty‑four weeks on 15 July 2022. Other ancillary reliefs ... |
id_1244 | 1 | In Surendra Chauhan v. State of Madhya Pradesh, a two‑Judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India upheld the Madhya Pradesh High Court's order to convict the accused under Section 314 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code for causing a woman's death by miscarriage. According to the facts of the case, the accused ... |
id_1244 | 2 | The Ministry responded that to increase the access of safe abortion services to all women, the provision of abortion services is proposed for all women irrespective of their marital status. The Committee on Empowerment of Women had recommended raising the permissible period of abortions to twenty‑four weeks and deletin... |
id_1244 | 3 | The rationale behind Rule 3B(c) is comparable to the rationale for Rule 3B(g), that is, a change in a woman's material circumstances during the ongoing pregnancy. Rule 3B(c) is based on the broad recognition of the fact that a change in the marital status of a woman often leads to a change in her material circumstances... |
id_1244 | 4 | A narrow interpretation of Rule 3B, limited only to married women, would render the provision discriminatory towards unmarried women and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. Article 14 requires the state to refrain from denying to any person equality before the law or equal protection of laws. Prohibiting unmar... |
id_1245 | 0 | Proceedings through Video Conferencing CR.R. No. 177 of 2021 Reserved on 12-08-2021 Delivered on 23-08-2021. Parties: Dilip Pandey, son of Ambika Prasad Pandey, aged about 37 years; Dinesh Kumar, son of Ambika Prasad Pandey, aged about 41 years; Smt. Varsha Pandey, wife of Dinesh Kumar, aged about 37 years, all residin... |
id_1246 | 0 | Petitioner/Applicant versus Respondent. Mr. Rajiv Patil, Senior Advocate, in behalf of Mr. Atharva A. Dandekar for the Petitioner/Applicant. Mr. Ashutosh Kulkarni, Mr. Ranvir Shekhawat and Mr. Akshay Kulkarni in behalf of M/s. Raj Legal for the Respondent. By the impugned interim order dated 9 February 2023 passed in P... |
id_1246 | 1 | Supreme Court of India in facts of that case observed that after obtaining the custody of the minor child the respondent does not appear to have neglected the minor and to look after her needs and the child will happy in the respondent's company. Supreme Court of India also considered that no allegation other than the ... |
id_1247 | 0 | Present: Smt. Anju Cletus, Judicial First Class Magistrate-III Dated this the 17th day of August 2023 Criminal Miscellaneous Petition 628/2020 in Criminal Case 358/2019 Original Report 14/2012 of Mekkappala Forest Station Petitioner/Complainant: State of Kerala represented by Range Forest Officer, Kodanadu, Original Re... |
id_1247 | 1 | As per Section 40(2A) introduced by Act 16 of 2003, no person other than a person having a certificate of ownership shall, after the commencement of the Wildlife (Protection) Amendment Act, 2002, acquire, receive, keep in his control, custody or possession any captive animal, animal article, trophy or uncured trophy sp... |
id_1248 | 0 | ITEM NO. 22 Court 3 (Video Conferencing) SECTION II Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Criminal) No(s). 762/2020 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 13-01-2020 in MB No. 220/2020 passed by the Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench) Date: 07-02-2022 These matters were called on for hearing today.... |
id_1249 | 0 | Supplementary List Criminal Miscellaneous No. 32 of 2022. Latief Ahmad Rather and others, Petitioners, represented by Mr. Hazim Qureshi, Advocate, and Shafeeqa Bhat. Respondents: None. Dated 08 April 2022., The petitioners have challenged the order dated 09 March 2022, passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, S... |
id_125 | 0 | The appellant, Harish Roshan Bhaskar Karnewar, original petitioner, and the respondent, Leelavati Reena Karnewar, original petitioner’s wife, are represented by Advocate Vishwadeep Mate and Advocate Jyoti Dharmadhikari respectively. These are appeals before the Family Court of Nagpur challenging the common judgment dat... |
id_125 | 1 | In paragraph 22 of her evidence, she has categorically stated that the letter (Exhibit 47) was written in her handwriting when the petitioner was under the influence of alcohol. There is no denial to the statement in her cross‑examination. The respondent has also specifically stated that she was under the treatment of ... |
id_1251 | 0 | The petition is filed by T. Kaliammal, the mother of the victim, and the State of Tamil Nadu represented by the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai; the Secretary, Tamil Nadu Legal Service Authority, North Road, Chennai; the Principal Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Fort S... |
id_1252 | 0 | Dated 05.01.2023 To the Secretary General, Supreme Court of India Dear Sir, On behalf of and on instructions of my client, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., which is wholly owned and run by the State of Rajasthan, and in consonance with the instructions of Mr. Dushyant Dave, Senior Advocate, who is leading us in the mat... |
id_1252 | 1 | In case notice is issued, the review petition will be listed for hearing after notice is served. This procedure is meant to save the time of the Supreme Court of India and to preclude frivolous review petitions being filed and heard in open court. However, with a view to avoid this procedure of no hearing, we find that... |
id_1254 | 0 | (arising out of Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No. of 2023) [Diary No. 2806/2023] Permission to file the appeal by special leave without certified copy and plain copy of the impugned judgment/order is granted. Leave granted., It is submitted that co‑accused have been granted bail by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ba... |
id_1255 | 0 | The appellant is aggrieved by the conviction affirmed and the sentence imposed by the Madras High Court, rejecting his plea. He is acquitted of the offence under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code, but convicted under Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012., The prosecution case is tha... |
id_1257 | 0 | Leave was granted. By order passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in Criminal Petition No. 2585 of 2019 filed by the appellant State, an order dated 18 January 2018 passed by the Trial Court was upheld. By the aforesaid order dated 27 January 2022, an application filed by the prosecution under Section 311 ... |
id_1259 | 0 | The Supreme Court Collegium has recommended the name of Shri Vimal Kanaiyalal Vyas, Judicial Officer, for appointment as a Judge of the High Court of Gujarat. On 7 February 2023, the Chief Justice of the High Court of Gujarat in consultation with his two senior‑most colleagues made the above recommendation. Views of th... |
id_126 | 0 | Writ Petition (Civil) No. 643/2015 All India Judges Association Petitioners Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondents Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 6471-6473/2020 Contempt Petition (Civil) Nos. 711/2022, 36/2023, 37/2023, 38/2023, 39/2023, 40/2023, 848/2023 in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 643/2015., Principles Evolve... |
id_126 | 1 | If life implies not only life in the physical sense but a bundle of rights that makes life worth living, there is no juristic or other basis for holding that denial of access to justice will not affect the quality of human life so as to take access to justice out of the purview of right to life guaranteed under Article... |
id_126 | 2 | Stagnation of careers of judicial officers due to administrative delays causes loss of morale and enthusiasm in vital stages of their careers, where they are entitled to be considered for career progression. The Supreme Court National Judicial Pay Commission's finding that the lack of timely preparation and scrutiny of... |
id_126 | 3 | No change in pension for those retiring after 01.01.2016; the pension or family pension shall be 50 % or 30 % of the last drawn pay at the time of retirement., Revised pension of retired judicial officers shall be 50 % of the last drawn pay., Formulations as given in the Report to apply for pension revision: multiplier... |
id_1261 | 0 | Judge Shekhar B. Saraf of the Supreme Court of India presided over the matter. The petitioner is identified as AP/482/2021 and the respondent/claimant as AP/482/2021. Counsel for the petitioner included Mister Siddhartha Lahiri, Advocate; Mister Deepak K Singh, Advocate; Mister Souvik Nandy; Mister S.N. Mookherjee; Mis... |
id_1261 | 1 | And, on the same page itself, the tribunal pointed out that the Railways, during cross‑examination of CW3, did not suggest that the method employed by the claimant was untenable or that it did not depict a reasonable mode of computation of the loss incurred towards freight rebate. Not only the data and figures presente... |
id_1261 | 2 | For the reasons discussed above, using the power conferred under Section 36(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as amended by Act 3 of 2021, the Supreme Court of India grants an unconditional stay on the operation of the Arbitral Award dated May 10, 2021 read with the corrections order dated August 18, pe... |
id_1265 | 0 | Doctor P. Muneeswari, Petitioner versus the Secretary to Government, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Secretariat, Chennai; the District Collector, Ramanathapuram District; the Revenue Divisional Officer, Ramanathapuram District; and the Tahsildar, Kamudhi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District, Respondents., Petiti... |
id_1266 | 0 | Case Number: CBI/34/2021, Reference Case Number: 220-2015-0012, under section 120-B, read with sections 420 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code, and sections 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. Central Bureau of Investigation versus Ram Gopal and others. Supreme Court of India, by orders dated 16... |
id_1267 | 0 | Reportable Civil Appeal No. 8129 of 2022 Madhyamam Broadcasting Limited (Appellant) versus Union of India and others (Respondents). Civil Appeal No. 8130 of 2022 and Civil Appeal No. 8131 of 2022. Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Chief Justice of India., The Union Ministry of Information and Broadcasting revoked the permis... |
id_1267 | 1 | On 28 February 2020, a show cause notice was issued by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB) alleging a violation of the Cable Television Network Rules 1994 and Programme Code of the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act 1995 while telecasting reports on the violence which took place in North‑East Del... |
id_1267 | 2 | The nature of the right infringed, the underlying purpose of the restrictions imposed, the extent and urgency of the evil sought to be remedied thereby, the disproportion of the imposition, the prevailing conditions at the time, all provide the basis for considering the reasonableness of a particular provision. The pro... |
id_1267 | 3 | On a perusal of the evidence, it was held that work at the headquarters involved matters of grave national security, and that if the employees and trade unions were consulted before the decision then the security would have been compromised. Lord Scarman observed that the Minister did not consult the employees because ... |
id_1267 | 4 | Since the Ministry of Home Affairs has not withdrawn security clearance of the existing News and Current Affairs TV channel Media One, it is the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting that has to justify its action of issuing a show‑cause notice for withdrawal of permission. At the same time, since the Ministry of Ho... |
id_1267 | 5 | A valid claim for privilege made under Section 123 proceeds on the basis of the theory that the production of the document in question would cause injury to public interest, and that, where a conflict arises between public interest and private interest, the latter must yield to the former. No doubt the litigant whose c... |
id_1267 | 6 | Identifying the relevancy of a document before the State is required to discharge the burden of proving public interest introduces a fundamental misconception in the application of public interest immunity, which is an exception to the production of documents. At an elementary level, it would be impossible to prove the... |
id_1267 | 7 | Even if the disclosure would conceivably injure public interest, the courts may still dismiss the claim of public interest immunity if the non-disclosure would render the issue non-justiciable, and on the facts of the case it is decided that the injury due to non-disclosure overweighs the injury due to disclosure. The ... |
id_1268 | 0 | Two important questions arise in these appeals first, as to whether an award delivered by an Emergency Arbitrator under the Arbitration Rules of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC Rules) can be said to be an order under Section 17(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act); and... |
id_1268 | 1 | He then reiterated that the expression \due regard\ contained in Section 36(3) is fundamentally different from the expression under the Code of Civil Procedure, and that Section 36(1) and Section 17(2) are pari materia provisions, distinct from Section 36(3), under which a stay of an award may be granted under the Arbi... |
id_1268 | 2 | It is clear beyond doubt that arbitration mentioned in section 25.2 of the First Capital Private Limited Shareholders Agreement would include an arbitrator appointed in accordance with the Singapore International Arbitration Centre Rules, which in turn would include an Emergency Arbitrator., The Singapore International... |
id_1268 | 3 | At the same time, it should also decide the objection to jurisdiction at the earliest possible moment. This is the general principle and this is what Section 9-A reiterates. Take this very case. The plaintiff asked for temporary injunction. An ad interim injunction was granted. Then the defendants came forward objectin... |
id_1268 | 4 | Notwithstanding such repeal, the provisions of the said enactments shall apply in relation to arbitral proceedings which commenced before the Arbitration and Conciliation Act came into force unless otherwise agreed by the parties but the Arbitration and Conciliation Act shall apply in relation to arbitral proceedings w... |
id_1268 | 5 | Salve then read the provisions of the New Zealand Arbitration Act, 1996, the Hong Kong Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 209), the Singapore Arbitration Act, 2001 as well as the Singapore International Arbitration Act, 1994, and the English Arbitration Act, 1996 to argue that in all the aforesaid legislations, awards passed ... |
id_1269 | 0 | No. K-11019/37/2023-USNII (ii) Government of India Ministry of Law and Justice Department of Justice (Appointments Division) Jaisalmer House, 26, Man Singh Road, New Delhi-110 011. Dated: 09th November, 2023., In exercise of the power conferred by Article 223 of the Constitution of India, the President is pleased to ap... |
id_1270 | 0 | Smt. Nalini Mishra, wife of Surendra Patel, aged about 34 years, residing at House No. 50, Side of Asina Green City Apartment, Near Durga Temple, Clay Castle Colony, In front of Kamal Vihar Gate, Old Dhamtari Road, Dunda, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, is the appellant. She is opposed by Surendra Kumar Patel, son of Shri B. P. ... |
id_1271 | 0 | Case No.: Public Interest Litigation (Suo Moto)/2/2019. Advocate for the Petitioner: Mister S S Dey, Senior Advocate. Advocate for the Respondent: Mister T C Chutia, (R-1 AND 5). Date: 10 February 2023. Heard Mister D. Nath, Senior Government Advocate for the State of Assam; Mister B.D. Goswami, Additional Advocate Gen... |
id_1272 | 0 | Ghuge Nijal Navin Shah, Applicant; The State of Maharashtra and others, Respondents; Ms. Sonal Parab and wife Tanvi Sawant in behalf of Rajeev Sawant Associates for the applicant; Mr. D.P. Singh for respondent No.2; Mr. A.R. Patil, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State., The applicant, who is facing prosecution un... |
id_1273 | 0 | Present: Mr. Satya Pal Jain, Additional Solicitor General of India, with Mr. Dheeraj Jain, Advocate, for respondent No.1 Union of India. Mr. Anil Mehta, Senior Standing Counsel, and Mr. Mayank Sharma, Junior Panel Counsel, Union Territory Chandigarh. Mr. Vinod Ghai, Advocate General, Punjab, with Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriw... |
id_1275 | 0 | Appellant Ram Pratap alias Tillu has preferred the present appeal against the judgment and order dated 21 March 2020 and 21 May 2020 passed by the 8th Additional Sessions Judge, Etawah, whereby the Sessions Court convicted the appellant under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and awarded death sentence with a fine o... |
id_1275 | 1 | Every circumstance from which a conclusion of guilt is to be drawn must be fully established; the circumstances should be conclusive in nature and tendency; they must form a chain of evidence so complete as not to leave any reasonable ground for a conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused; and such chain ... |
id_1276 | 0 | The petitioners are before the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka calling into question proceedings in Criminal Case No. 1580/2022 registered for an offence punishable under Section 3 of the Karnataka Open Places (Prevention of Disfigurement) Act, 1981 (hereinafter referred to as the Act)., A complaint was registered by t... |
id_1278 | 0 | Prajakta Vartak, Paromita Puthran – Petitioners. The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai – Respondent (Not on board. Taken on board.) RNA Royale Park Co-operative Housing Society and Others – Petitioners. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and Others – Respondents. Mr. Nishad Nevgi with Ms. Anjali Malekar in b... |
id_1280 | 0 | Hon'ble Pratinker Diwaker, Chief Justice, and Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava, Justice, received a WhatsApp message at 3:25 pm today. A direction was given to constitute this Bench at 8:00 pm today at the residence of the Chief Justice to hear the matter. An intimation was also given to the office of the learned Advocate G... |
id_1283 | 0 | Case: Bail No. 73 of 2021. Applicant: Kaleem. Opposite Party: Union of India through Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Control Bureau, Lucknow. Counsel for Applicant: Indrajeet Shukla. Counsel for Opposite Party: Shikha Sinha and Akhilesh Kumar Awasthi. Honourable Siddharth J. Heard learned counsel for applicant Shri Akh... |
id_1284 | 0 | Date of decision: 12th October, 2023. Through: Mr. Sagar Chandra, Ms. Shubhie Wahi and Ms. Ankita Seth, Advocates. Versus: Mr. Amit Tomar, Advocate Prathiba M. Singh, Judge (Oral)., The hearing was conducted in hybrid mode. Interim Application 20160/2023 (for exemption). This is an application filed by the Plaintiff se... |
id_1287 | 0 | CrlM 1586/2022 Reserved on: 31 July 2023 Date of Decision: 01 September 2023 Dilshad Sheikh and others Petitioner Through: Mr. Areeb Javid Kawoosa, Advocate Versus Sabha Sheikh Through: Mr. Saqib Shabir, Advocate Respondent(s) Honorable Mr. Justice Javed Iqbal Wani, Judge., The petitioners in the instant petition have ... |
id_1288 | 0 | The applicants have filed these petitions under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quashment of FIR No.139/2018 registered on a complaint made by respondent No.2 alleging commission of offences under sections 498-A, 323 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code at Police Station Mahila Thana, Indore. The petition... |
id_1289 | 0 | Transfer Appeal (C) No.1 of 2023 P. G. Ajithkumar, Judge. The petitioner in unnumbered Transfer Petition (C) No.25 of 2023 has filed this appeal invoking the provisions of Section 5(i) of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958., When this appeal was filed, the Registry raised an objection regarding its maintainability. As per... |
id_129 | 0 | Ashvini Narwade, ABC Petitioners versus Union of India through its Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Department of Health Research; State of Maharashtra through the Public Health Department; National Assisted Reproductive Technology and Surrogacy Board, through the Department of Health Research; State Assisted Rep... |
id_1293 | 0 | We have perused the draft judgments prepared by our esteemed brothers Ajay Rastogi, Judge and Hrishikesh Roy, Judge. With profound respect to our learned Brothers, we are unable to, however, concur with them in their reasoning and conclusions save as will be made clear. Hence, the following judgment., A Bench of three ... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.