ID stringlengths 4 7 | para_id int64 0 26 | newJudgement stringlengths 0 34.1k |
|---|---|---|
id_112 | 13 | It is not defamation in A to express in good faith any opinion whatever respecting Z's conduct in petitioning Government on a public question, in signing a requisition for a meeting on a public question, in presiding or attending at such meeting, in forming or joining any society which invites the public support, in vo... |
id_112 | 14 | Clause 55 of the Bill seeks to provide that whoever abets the commission of an offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life shall, if that offence is not committed in consequence of the abetment and no express provision is made under this Sanhita for the punishment of such abetment, be punished with imprisonm... |
id_112 | 15 | |
id_112 | 16 | |
id_113 | 0 | Reportable Miscellaneous Application No. 2157 of 2023 Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1137 of 2023 X Petitioner Versus Union of India and Another Respondents Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Chief Justice of India., The Registry is directed to anonymize the name of the petitioner in this judgment, all orders that have been passe... |
id_113 | 1 | There are no substantial foetal abnormalities diagnosed by a Medical Board in this case, in terms of Section 3(2B). The Supreme Court of India called for a second medical report from All India Institute of Medical Sciences to ensure that the facts of the case were accurately placed before it and no foetal abnormality w... |
id_1132 | 0 | F.No. K.13022/01/2024-U. Government of India Ministry of Law and Justice Department of Justice (Appointments Division) Jaisalmer House, 26, Man Singh Road, New Delhi-110011. Dated 30th January 2024. In exercise of the power conferred by clause (1) of Article 217 of the Constitution of India, the President is pleased to... |
id_1134 | 0 | Applicant: Anil Kumar. Opposite Party: State of Uttar Pradesh. Counsel for Applicant: Abhishek Singh, Advocate Z Khan, Akshaivar Singh. Counsel for Opposite Party: G. A. Honourable Subhash Vidyarthi, J., Heard Sri Advocate Z Khan, the learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Arun Kumar Pandey, the learned Additional Gove... |
id_1135 | 0 | Applicant: Arvind Kejriwal. Opposite Party: State of Uttar Pradesh through Principal Secretary / Additional Chief Secretary, Home. Counsel for Applicant: Mahmood Alam, Anjani Kumar Mishra, Manmohan Singh, Nadeem Murtaza, Sheeran Mohiuddin Alavi. Counsel for Opposite Party: G.A. Honourable Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J., Hear... |
id_1135 | 1 | No substantial ground has been made out which may justify interference by the Uttarakhand High Court under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure. In view of the above, I do not find any error of law or perversity in the order dated 12.08.2015, by which the application for exemption has been rejected. As far as the pra... |
id_1136 | 0 | Shephali Micropark Logistics Pvt Ltd, Petitioner, versus the State of Maharashtra and another Respondent. Nirmal Motors through its Proprietor, Petitioner, versus State of Maharashtra through Department of Transport and others Respondents. Nevaan Motors Pvt Ltd through its Director, Petitioner, versus State of Maharash... |
id_1137 | 0 | Reserved on: 13th July, 2023 Pronounced on: 29th August, 2023 Through: Petitioner in person versus Through: Mr. Harish Pandey and Mr. Anshuman Tiwari, Advocates. I.A. No. 3129/2021 (under Section 8, 83 and 86 of the Representation of People Act, 1951 read with Order VI Rule 16 and Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil... |
id_1138 | 0 | These appeals impugn common final judgment dated 24.01.2014 in Family Court of Andhra Pradesh no. 236 of 2011 filed by the respondents and Family Court of Andhra Pradesh No. 403 of 2012 filed by the appellant; passed by the Andhra Pradesh High Court. In these appeals, the subject matter of dispute between the mother an... |
id_1139 | 0 | This reference to the larger bench of five judges arises out of the writ petitions filed challenging Notification No. 3407(E) dated 8 November 2016 (hereinafter referred to as the impugned Notification), issued by the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (2) of Section 26 of the Reserve... |
id_1139 | 1 | In any case, the relevant factors required to be considered were ignored, and false factors were taken into consideration from the very inception and have subsequently been proved false. Accordingly, the Supreme Court of India is entitled to exercise its powers of judicial review and hold that the decision‑making proce... |
id_1139 | 2 | It is submitted that out of the total cases, 20,343 cases were rejected due to various reasons. The learned Attorney General submits that it will not be permissible for the Supreme Court of India to devise a norm which would result in altering the essential character of the enactment. In support of this submission, he ... |
id_1139 | 3 | But, argues Mr Pathak, granting that this is so, it must be held that when the phrase any one is used with the preposition of, followed by a word denoting a number of persons, it never means every one. The extract from the Oxford Dictionary, it is interesting to notice, speaks of an assertion concerning a being or thin... |
id_1139 | 4 | Supreme Court of India has generally taken the view that ascertainment of legislative intent is a basic rule of statutory construction and that a rule of construction should be preferred which advances the purpose and object of a legislation and that, though a construction according to plain language should ordinarily ... |
id_1139 | 5 | It was sought to be argued that Section 150(1) delegates completely unguided power to the Corporation in the matter of optional taxes and suffers from the vice of excessive delegation and, therefore, is unconstitutional. The Supreme Court of India after considering various earlier cases including Hamdard Dawakhana (Wak... |
id_1139 | 6 | Therefore, anything that may pose a threat to or have an impact on the financial system of the country can be regulated or prohibited by the Reserve Bank of India, despite the said activity not forming part of the credit system or payment system. The expression management of the currency appearing in Section 3(1) need ... |
id_1139 | 7 | As already discussed hereinabove, the record would reveal that the matter was under active consideration for a period of six months between the Reserve Bank of India and the Central Government. As such, merely because the Central Government has advised the Central Board to consider recommending demonetisation and that ... |
id_1139 | 8 | It held that, having regard to the malpractices which are noticed in the Common Entrance Test (CET) conducted by such private institutions themselves, it is, undoubtedly, in the larger interest and welfare of the student community to promote merit and excellence and to curb malpractices. Supreme Court of India held tha... |
id_1139 | 9 | |
id_1139 | 10 | The procedure envisaged under sub‑section (2) of Section 26 of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, simply issued a notification in the Gazette of India on 8 November 2016 demonetising all series of bank notes of the denominations of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000. Consequently, approximately 86 per cent of all notes in circulati... |
id_1139 | 11 | The specified bank notes held by a person other than a banking company referred to in sub‑paragraph (1) of paragraph 1 or Government Treasury may be exchanged at any Issue Office of the Reserve Bank of India or any branch of public sector banks, private sector banks, foreign banks, Regional Rural Banks, Urban Cooperati... |
id_1139 | 12 | Considerations which could guide the Bank's recommendation are limited or narrow in compass. Other aspects of governance. Considerations which could guide the Central Government's proposal to carry out demonetisation are broad or wide., Process/Route to be followed to carry out demonetisation: Issuance of a Notificatio... |
id_1139 | 13 | In such a situation, as already held, the Central Government would have to resort to the legislative process by initiating a plenary legislation in Parliament. What is being emphasised is that the Central Government cannot act in isolation in such matters. The Central Government has to firstly take the opinion of the C... |
id_1139 | 14 | On 8 November 2016 the Government issued a notification concerning demonisation. A close reading of that notification, together with the records, reveals several points. First, the proposal for demonisation originated from the Central Government in a letter addressed to the Reserve Bank of India dated 7 November 2016; ... |
id_1139 | 15 | However, having regard to the fact that the impugned notification dated 8th November 2016 and the Act have been acted upon, the declaration of law made herein would apply prospectively and would not affect any action taken by the Central Government or the Bank pursuant to the issuance of the Notification dated 8th Nove... |
id_1140 | 0 | Supreme Court of India. Petitioner: In Re. Respondent: Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh. Counsel for Petitioner: Suo Motu Honourable Justice Pritinker Diwaker, Chief Justice Honourable Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Judge., Owing to the ongoing lawyers' strike on account of the incident that occurred in District Hapur, the Bar C... |
id_1141 | 0 | Case: WRIT C No. 26355 of 2022. Petitioner: Narendra Singh Panwar. Respondent: Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited and two others. Counsel for petitioner: Ashish Kumar Singh, Ajay Kumar Singh. Counsel for respondents: C.S.C., Kartikeya Saran, Pranjal Mehrotra, Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal, Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Di... |
id_1141 | 1 | The Committee noted that this characteristic of such contracts i.e. of having remedy against both the surety and the corporate debtor, without the obligation to exhaust the remedy against one of the parties before proceeding against the other, is of utmost important for the creditor and is the hallmark of a guarantee c... |
id_1142 | 0 | March 23, 2022 Supplementary List SG/S Biswas. Writ Petition (Civil) 130 of 2022: The Supreme Court of India, on its own motion, in re: The brutal incident of Bogtui Village, Rampurhat, Birbhum. Writ Petition (Civil) 124 of 2022: Anindya Sundar Das vs. Union of India and others. Writ Petition (Civil) 125 of 2022: Tarun... |
id_1144 | 0 | 18 September 2020\n\nShephali (All matters to be renumbered subsequently) Rajeev Kumar Hindu Undivided Family and Anr Petitioners versus Anugrah Stock and Brokers Private Limited Respondent; Satish Chugh Petitioner versus Anugrah Stock and Brokers Private Limited Respondent; Urmil Chugh Petitioner versus Anugrah Stock ... |
id_1145 | 0 | Vasundhara, daughter of Praful Bhojane, Union of India through Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi and others. Office notes, office memoranda of Supreme Court of India or judge's order coram, appearances, Supreme Court of India orders or directions and registrar's or... |
id_1146 | 0 | M/s Renaissance Infrastructure through its Partners and Others Appellants/Applicants versus Shri Parth B. Suchak and Another Respondents. Mr. Prasad S. Dani, Senior Advocate in behalf of the Appellants/Applicants. Mr. Sachin Pawar for the Appellants/Applicants. Mr. Rubin Vakil and Mr. Prashant Ghelani, Mr. Ankul Kalal ... |
id_1147 | 0 | W.P. No. 2530 of 2023\n\nJayaraman T.M., Petitioner\n\nVersus\n\n1. The National Commission for Scheduled Castes, 5th Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan, Khan Market, New Delhi‑110 003.\n2. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments, 119, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Nungambakkam, Chennai‑600 034.\n3. K. Sinivasan\n4. T... |
id_1148 | 0 | Kisan Vitthal Kadam and Anr. Petitioners; The State of Maharashtra and Anr. Respondents. Mr. Ranjit Shinde as well as Mr. Ketan Shinde for the Petitioners. Mr. R. S. Pawar, Additional Government Pleader for the Respondents No.1 and No.2, State. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioners., This petition reflects the ... |
id_1149 | 0 | Ba 2927.22 Diksha Rane Senior Counsel Mr. Vikram Chaudhari as well as Adv. Aniket Nikam, Adv. Inderpal Singh, Adv. Hargun Sandhu, Adv. Devyani Chemburkar, Adv. Arveen Sekhon for the applicant. Mr. Anil Singh, Additional Solicitor General as well as Mr. Ashish Chavan, Mr. Aditya Thakkar, Ms. Smita Thakur, Mr. Zishan Qua... |
id_115 | 0 | Adjudication order in the matter of Viaan Industries Limited. The parties are Mr. Ripu Sudan Kundra, Ms. Shilpa Shetty Kundra and Viaan Industries Limited. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) conducted an investigation into the trading of the securities of Viaan Industries Limited (formerly Hindustan Safe... |
id_1150 | 0 | Sri Praveen Uppar, learned High Court of Karnataka, accepts notice for respondent Nos. 1 to 4., The appellant is before this Karnataka High Court seeking the following reliefs: (i) call for the records and set aside the impugned order dated 24 June 2021 passed in Writ Petition No. 107136/2018 (S‑RES) by a learned Singl... |
id_1151 | 0 | Versus Appearance: Mr. A. J. Yagnik (1372) for the Applicant No. 1 for the Respondent No. 2,3 Date: 10/02/2023. By way of the main petition being Special Criminal Application No. 5485 of 2019, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: (a) Be pleased to admit and allow this petition; (b) Be pleased to direct ... |
id_1152 | 0 | Bhupinder Singh Appellant(s) versus Unitech Limited Respondent(s)/Applicant(s) Present Interim Application No. 88960 of 2020 has been preferred by the present management of Unitech Limited seeking the following prayers and directions: Direct Messrs Devas Global Limited Liability Partnership to deposit the entire sale c... |
id_1152 | 1 | In Krishnaswamy S. Pd. v. Union of India [Krishnaswamy S. Pd. v. Union of India, (2006) 3 Supreme Court Cases 286], it was observed that an unintentional mistake of the Supreme Court of India, which may prejudice the cause of any party, must and alone could be rectified. Thus, in our opinion, the period for which the i... |
id_1155 | 0 | Ajay Madhukar Makaji Mudgul, Age: 40 years, resident of Gole, Gondegaon, Taluka Niphad, District Nashik. (Presently lodged at Nashik Central Prison, Nashik). Appellant versus the State of Maharashtra through Lasalgaon Police Station, Respondent. High Court on its own motion petitioner versus Madhukar Makaji Mudgul, res... |
id_1155 | 1 | His professional fee quantified as per rule to be paid to him by the High Court Legal Aid Services Committee, Mumbai. |
id_1156 | 0 | Reserved on: 30th August 2022. Pronounced on: 21st November 2022. Through: Ms. Pooja M. Saigal, Mr. Anshul Bajaj and Mr. Simrat Singh Pasay, Advocates for the petitioner versus Through: Mr. Suhail Dutt, Senior Advocate with Mr. H. S. Parihar, Mr. Kuldeep Singh Parihar and Ms. Ikshita Parihar, Advocates for the responde... |
id_1156 | 1 | Versus S.N. Goyal (2008) 8 Supreme Court Cases 92 and Regional Manager, Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, Etawah and Others versus Hoti Lal & Another (2003) 27. In view of the above discussions, learned senior counsel for the respondent vehemently submitted that the petitioner has failed to make out any c... |
id_1156 | 2 | This is more so when the party against whom an order has been passed does not dispute the facts and does not demand to test the veracity of the version or the credibility of the statement. In view of the discussion in the foregoing paragraphs, there is no force in the argument that the entire disciplinary proceedings a... |
id_1157 | 0 | Naresh Goyal, age 73 years, residing at 72 Jupiter Apartments, Anstey Road, Off Altamount Road, Mumbai 400026, is a petitioner. The respondents are the Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai Zone II, Ceejay House, Unit Nos. 301, 302, 303, 402 & 403, Dr. Annie Besant Road, Worli, Mumbai 400018; the State of Maharashtra thro... |
id_116 | 0 | The present appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 9 September 2016 passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the NCDRC) in Revision Petition No. 1104 of 2016 whereby the NCDRC, while allowing the said Revision Petition filed by Respondent No. 1 – ... |
id_1161 | 0 | Suo Moto Mr. Anil Joshi, Additional Advocate General. Today, the entire country is celebrating Pran Pratishtha Mahotsava of Ram Temple situated in Ayodhya. The real celebration would be if the society respects and follows the ideal and virtues which Lord Ram embodied and is worshiped as an ideal person – Maryada Purosh... |
id_1163 | 0 | Applicant: Kundan Yadav Opposite Party: State of Uttar Pradesh Counsel for Applicant: Vishwa Nath Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party: G.A. Hon'ble Justice Vikram D. Chauhan, J., Learned Additional Government Advocate for the State submits that instructions have been received and he has no objection in case the bail appl... |
id_1164 | 0 | Arising out of Police Station Case No. 57 of the year 2015, Thana Jhajha, District Jamui, the appellant is Islam Mian, also known as Md. Islam, son of late Liyakat Mian, resident of village Narganjo, Police Station Jhajha, District Jamui. The appellant is the convicted accused. The respondent is the State of Bihar. App... |
id_1167 | 0 | Mr. Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Assistant Solicitor, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi with Mr. Aditya P. Khanna, Advocate. The matter has been placed before the Full Bench by Hon'ble the Chief Justice in the light of the order dated 19.04.2021, passed by the Division Bench in the present Writ Petition., Th... |
id_117 | 0 | Asha wife of Rajendra Jangam, Asha daughter of Uttamrao Aglave and others Petitioner versus the Union of India and others Respondents. Mister B L Sagar Killarikar, Advocate for petitioners. Mister Bhushan B Kulkarni, Advocate for respondents 1, 2 and 6. Mister Alok M Sharma, Advocate for respondents 3 to 5. This public... |
id_1172 | 0 | % Date of Decision: 23.10.2020 Through Mr. Hemant Singh, Mr. Vipul Tiwary and Ms. Shipra Alisha Philip, Advs. Versus Through Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Malvika Trivedi, Mr. Mrinal Ojha, Mr. Harshul Singh, Mr. Debarshi Dutta and Mr. Rajat Pradhan, Advs., The aforesaid suit is filed by the plaintiff seeking a d... |
id_1172 | 1 | It is further pleaded that the tagline NWTK and the mark NEWHOUR are not governed by the employment contract between the plaintiff and defendant No. 2. These are not trademarks to which the plaintiff has any right., I may first deal with the preliminary objection raised by the defendants that the present suit is barred... |
id_1172 | 2 | The finding in favour of the appellant to which the learned counsel drew our attention was based upon dissimilarity of the packing in which the goods of the two parties were vended, the difference in the physical appearance of the two packets by reason of the variation in the colour and other features and their general... |
id_1174 | 0 | Applicant: Suraj Pasi. Opposite Party: State of Uttar Pradesh. Counsel for Applicant: Rajesh Chandra Dwivedi, Ajay Kumar Pathak, Ashish Kumar Dubey, Praveen Kumar Srivastava. Counsel for Opposite Party: Honourable Ajay Bhanot, Shri Paritosh Kumar Malviya, Additional Government Advocate for the State., The learned Addit... |
id_1175 | 0 | Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 511 of 2022 arising out of Police Station case No. – Year – 0, Thana – District – Patna. Amit Raj, male, about 35 years old, son of Sri Janardan Prasad, resident of C/O Dwarika Prasad, Babu Tola Lane, Govind Mitra Road, Police Station Pirbahore, Post Office Bankipur, District Patna, ... |
id_1177 | 0 | Vitthal Rambhau Chaudhari, aged about 58 years, occupation Agriculturist, resident of Pardi Takmor, Taluka and District Washim. The State of Maharashtra, through Police Station Officer, Police Station, Washim (Rural), Taluka and District Washim. Madan Shyamrao Chaudhari, aged about 33 years, occupation Service, residen... |
id_1179 | 0 | Case: Writ Petition No. 3990 of 2014. Petitioner: Prem Prakash Yadav. Respondent: Union of India through the Secretary, Minister of Urban Planning and Development. Counsel for Petitioner: Chandra Kala Pandey, Prince Verma, Ravi Shanker Tewari, Santosh Kr. Yadav Warsi. Counsel for Respondent: Chief Secretary, Additional... |
id_1180 | 0 | Against the Order dated 20 December 2012 in Complaint No. 20 of 2011 of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Haryana, this appeal is filed. The appellant is Mr. Praveen Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate. The respondents are: Respondent No. 1 and 2 – Mr. S. Hari Haran, Advocate; Respondent No. 3 to 5 – NEMO. Dated 1... |
id_1182 | 0 | Sunil Kumar (Appellant) versus the State of Bihar and Another (Respondent). Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna dated 17.08.2021 in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 13149 of 2021, by which the High Court released the respondent No... |
id_1184 | 0 | L & T Finance Limited, a non‑banking finance company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and registered with the Reserve Bank of India as a non‑banking financial institution, having its registered office at 15th floor, PS Srijan Tech Park, Plot No. 52, Block DN, Sector‑V, Salt Lake City, Kolkat... |
id_1184 | 1 | The District Magistrates/Collectors shall submit a report giving the details of the applications which have not been disposed of within thirty days or any order which has not been implemented within thirty days with reasons thereof to the Divisional Commissioner in the first week of each month., Any party whose applica... |
id_1185 | 0 | By way of these transfer petitions filed under Section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Yogesh Upadhyay and his proprietary concern, Messrs Shakti Buildcon, seek transfer of Supreme Court Cases Nos. 25668/2019 and 26875/2019, both titled Atlanta Limited versus Messrs Shakti Buildcon and Another, pending before th... |
id_1186 | 0 | Court Cases 1137/2022 24.11.2022 Present: Shri Anish Dhingra, lead Senior Police Prosecutor for the complainant. Submissions on the complaint were heard on earlier occasions. Entire material available on record has been perused. The present complaint under section 200 of the Criminal Procedure Code is filed by the Inco... |
id_119 | 0 | Reserved on 29.06.2022 and delivered on 04.07.2022. Applicant: Parvez Ahmad and three others. Opposite Party: State of Uttar Pradesh and another. Counsel for Applicant: Nasira Adil and Mohd Zubair. Counsel for Opposite Party: G.A. Honourable Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, J., Heard Sri N.I. Jafri, learned Senior Advocate, assis... |
id_1190 | 0 | The present writ petition was filed under Article 132 of the Constitution of India over two decades ago, seeking directions to respondent No. 1 State of Karnataka, respondent No. 2 State of Andhra Pradesh and respondent No. 3 Union of India to stop all mining and related activities in the forest areas of Karnataka and ... |
id_1190 | 1 | In the circumstances, the Competition Commission of India is of the considered view that orders specific to the three districts in the State of Karnataka banning export of iron ore and pellets issued by the Supreme Court of India in the context of the total ban on mining in the three districts ordered by this Supreme C... |
id_1195 | 0 | Ms. Meenakshi Arora, Senior Advocate (Additional Counsel). Mr. Kunal Chatterji, Advocate on Record. Mr. Avnish Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For Petitioners: Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General; Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, Additional Solicitor General; Mr. Rajat Nair, Advocate; Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Advocate; Mr. Amit Mahajan, Advocate... |
id_1197 | 0 | 6/6 Basement Jangpura B, Delhi 110014 judicialreforms.org Patrons: Shri Shanti Bhushan, Prof. B. B. Pande, Dr. Bhaskar Rao, Ms. Arundhati Roy, Shri Pradip Prabhu, Prof. Babu Mathew, Dr. Baba Adhav, Ms. Kamini Jaiswal, Shri Mihir Desai, Shri Manoj Mitta Executive Committee: Prashant Bhushan (convenor), Cheryl D. Souza (... |
id_12 | 0 | Chandrapur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd., through its Chairman, Civil Lines, Chandrapur, Tahsil and District Chandrapur; Shri Santoshsingh son of Chandansingh Rawat, aged 60 years, occupation Business, resident at Post Mul, Ward No. 11, near Rest House, Mul, Tahsil Mul, District Chandrapur; The State of Mahar... |
id_12 | 1 | We have carefully examined rival submissions and considered the relevant Rules of Business and Instructions issued thereunder. There is no dispute that Article 166 of the Constitution of India empowers the Governor to make Rules for smooth transaction of business of the Government and for allocation of business amongst... |
id_1200 | 0 | Reportable Writ Petition (Civil) No. 1281 of 2021 Dilip B. Jiwrajka, Petitioner(s) versus Union of India and others, Respondent(s)., Writ Petition (Civil) Diary No. 18674/2022, Diary No. 29889/2022, Diary No. 36132/2022, Diary No. 36130/2022, Diary No. 40974/2022, Diary No. 42246/2022, Diary No. 4241/2023, Diary No. 43... |
id_1200 | 1 | The function of a resolution professional under Section 99 is not of an adjudicatory nature. The purpose of a resolution professional under Part III of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is only to collate facts. Section 99, in any event, does contemplate a sufficient opportunity to the debtor in the process of formula... |
id_1200 | 2 | Significantly, clause (c) of Section 101(2) which places a restraint on the transfer, alienation or disposal of assets does not find a place in Section 96(1)(b). It consequently operates only after the admission of an application under Section 60. This analysis would indicate that the adjudicatory function of the adjud... |
id_1201 | 0 | Contempt Petition No. 181 of 2021 Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, represented by its Press Relations Secretary TKS Elangovan, residing at C5, Lloyds Colony, Royapettah, Chennai 600014, having office at 367 & 369, Anna Arivalayam, Anna Salai, Teynampet, Chennai 600018. Petitioners: 1. Mr. Rajesh Bhushan, Secretary, Ministry ... |
id_1201 | 1 | The State of Tamil Nadu is likely to deviate from the accepted proportion of reservation provided to Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe categories from the currently applicable 15 per cent for Scheduled Castes and 7 per cent for Scheduled Tribes and substitute it with 18 per cent and 1 per cent, respectively, which wi... |
id_1201 | 2 | Merely because the immediate lis pertains to the contempt jurisdiction would not imply that the High Court sheds its plenary authority under Article 226 of the Constitution while considering the manner of implementation of the said order. At any rate, this Bench is the Public Interest Litigation Bench in the High Court... |
id_1202 | 0 | Neutral Citation Number: 2023/DHC/000886 (Original) + Commercial Court 537/2022 and Interim Application 12437/2022 (Order XI Rule 1(4) of the Code of Civil Procedure). Through: Mr. Rishi Bansal, Mr. Arpit and Mr. Deepak, Advocates, versus Through: Mr. Arnav Goyal, Advocate. Interim Application 13291/2022 (Order VIII Ru... |
id_1203 | 0 | Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 19822 of 2019. Indian National Trust for Art and Cultural Heritage (INTACH) Patna Chapter, through its Convener Sri Jatindra Kumar Lall, aged about 83 years, male, son of late Y. K. Lall, resident near IOC Petrol Pump, Raja Radhika Raman Path, Boring Road, Patna, Bihar 800001, is the pe... |
id_1205 | 0 | Criminal Appeal No.1200 of 2023 dated the 9th day of November 2023. The appellant is the sole accused, who is convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for ten years and to pay a fine of 1 lakh for the offence punishable under Section 22(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and,... |
id_1206 | 0 | Case: Bail No. 5974 of 2020. Applicant: Anil Kumar Sharma. Opposite Party: Enforcement Directorate, Lucknow Zone, Lucknow. Counsel for Applicant: Pranshu Agrawal, Manoj Singh, Mohd. Yasir Abbasi. Counsel for Opposite Party: Shiv P. Shukla. Hon'ble Dinesh Kumar Singh, Judge., The bail application was filed under Section... |
id_1206 | 1 | It has been expounded that the Supreme Court of India at the stage of considering the application for grant of bail shall consider the question from the angle as to whether the accused was possessed of the requisite mens rea. The Supreme Court of India is not required to record a positive finding that the accused had n... |
id_1210 | 0 | Shri Binoy Viswam: Will the Minister of Law and Justice be pleased to state whether the Ministry is involved with the Criminal Law Reforms Committee set up to review changes to the Indian Penal Code, Code of Criminal Procedure and Indian Evidence Act, if not the reasons for non‑involvement of the Ministry in this proje... |
id_1211 | 0 | Mr. Tanveer Ahmad Mir, Advocate, appeared on behalf of the petitioners along with Mr. Arfat Rashid, Advocate. Mr. T. M. Shamsi, Deputy Superintendent of Police (General Investigation), appeared with Ms. Zeenaz Akhter, Advocate. The matters are CRM(M) No. 235/2023 in conjunction with CRM(M) No. 308/2023 and CRM(M) No. 3... |
id_1212 | 0 | F.A. No. 712 of 2020 was reserved on 17 February 2024 and pronounced on 1 March 2024. The appeal, heard and reserved, was pronounced on the said date by Justice Vinay Saraf. The appellant, the husband, sought a decree of divorce on the grounds of mental cruelty and desertion. He had preferred a petition under Section 1... |
id_1212 | 1 | Division Bench of the Supreme Court of India had taken into consideration the judgment and order passed by the trial Court of acquitting the Appellant therein for the offence punishable under Section 498-A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and also the Family Appeal No. 712 of 2020 deposition of the A... |
id_1212 | 2 | The evidence produced by the husband to prove instances of cruelty when the parties were living together is not sufficient, cogent, or convincing for reaching any conclusion of commission of cruelty by the wife. Therefore, the allegation of the husband that the wife committed cruelty with the husband and his family mem... |
id_1213 | 0 | Date of decision: 11 October 2023. The appeal is filed by the husband, Shri Rinku Dahiya, and the wife, Smt. (name omitted), through advocates Mr. Anuj Arora and Mr. Pardeep Sharma, against the order dated 23 February 2023 dismissing the application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, whereby the husband ... |
id_1215 | 0 | Judgment Reserved on 09.06.2021. Judgment delivered on 11.06.2021. No. 5334 of 2021. Applicant: Mohammad Azam Khan. Opposite Party: State of Uttar Pradesh and Another. Counsel for Applicant: Nadeem Murtaza, Sheeran Mohiuddin Alavi. Counsel for Opposite Party: Government Advocate Honourable Rajeev Singh, J. The Allahaba... |
id_1216 | 0 | Pronounced on 21 July 2023. The plaintiff, Son of Shri B.S. Ahluwalia, residing at D‑34, Defence Colony, New Delhi, is represented by Mister Chetan Anand and Mister Akash Srivastava, Advocates. The defendants are identified as follows: D‑1, Soami Nagar, New Delhi (also known as Messrs Buffalo Communications), son of Mi... |
id_1216 | 1 | The said tapes were broadcasted in public interest and there was no intention whatsoever to vilify, malign, defame or denigrate the plaintiff. Therefore, the suit of the plaintiff is not maintainable as is evident from the subsequent developments which were reported in the newspaper in some details., As per the informa... |
id_1216 | 2 | Defence Witness 1 in his cross-examination established that no demand whatsoever was made by the plaintiff during his conversation which was recorded on the tapes by Defendant Number 4 Mathew Samuel, at a time when Defendant Number 3 was not present. It was merely an inference drawn by Defence Witness 1 on the basis of... |
id_1217 | 0 | 114/7 CRWP-8809 of 2021 Rohit Kumar v. State of Union Territory of Chandigarh and others 2) CRWP-5888 of 2021 Aaftab and another v. State of Haryana and others 3) CRWP-6017 of 2021 Kavita and another v. State of Punjab and others 4) CRWP-9892 of 2021 Anjali and another v. State of Haryana and others 5) CRWP-10527 of 20... |
id_1219 | 0 | Date: 19 October 2021\nThe Secretary, State Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh, 19, Maharshi Dayanand Marg, Vivek Vihar Colony, Civil Lines, near AGO office, Alka Puri Colony, Prayagraj, Uttar Pradesh 211001\nSub.: Direction to Uttar Pradesh Bar Council to withdraw the call for abstinence from judicial work by lawyers across... |
id_122 | 0 | Khalid Anis Ansari, Petitioner, versus Union of India and others, Respondents. Janhit Abhiyan, Petitioner, versus Union of India and others, Respondents., Intervenor No. 1 is the National Convenor of the National Coalition for Strengthening the Prevention of Atrocities Act (NCSPA), a forum of more than 450 Dalit and Ad... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.