Datasets:

lmqg

/

qg_subjqa

like 1

The D3100

question: What is the best instruments to take a good image?, context: I learned photography in the early 1970's on a 35mm Miranda Sensorex SLR. Lost interest in the hobby for a long time, then got back into it in 2009. Wow, have things changed! I have been using a Panasonic LX3 since December 2009 with very good results (fast Leica glass on the LX3) and was ready to get back into an interchangeable lens camera. After doing a lot of hands on research, I decided on the D3100.I've had mine for two weeks now and for the most part, I am impressed. The D3100 takes excellent images on automatic with the kit lens. Composition is much easier with a proper viewfinder and the larger sensor makes obtaining shallow depth of field simple. My semi-pro photographer friends have all commented that my images with the D3100 are more creative, more artistic and much better than with the LX3.Personally, I can see the enhanced creativity in my D3100 images but I feel there is little difference in image quality between the two cameras. A bit of a disappointment on that regard (I was hoping for sharper images) but others who have viewed my images disagree with me, so maybe I am being overly critical. One thing I have discovered is the D3100's abilities far exceed mine when I take it off automatic - in other words, there is a steep learning curve going manual on this camera. I have a lot to learn about exposure so I feel that the D3100 will be a great tool to help me enhance my photographic skills.I am a bit disappointed in the build quality - the SD card door is flimsy and moves around a bit when closed, the lens creaks. The all metal LX3 has much better build quality than the D3100. To be fair, the D3100 has better build quality than the Canons I tested.The D3100 feels great in my hands and is very nice to use. The ergonomics are perfect. I tested the D5100 and the D90 as well as all the Canon Rebels. Of all of them, the D3100 felt the best.I considered getting the D5100 for its better sensor and screen, but the actual real world price difference was $400 (D5100 was being sold above sticker, D3100 was sold to me with a $100 Nikon rebate and an additional 10% discount from the retailer) and that was a significant savings.The 230k screen is adequate, not great, but acceptable.Overall, I am pleased. I am looking forward to learning how to get the most out of this camera and I definitely feel it will help me grow as a photographer.Update, 6/1/11: After reading Bryan Peterson's "Understanding Exposure", I am now shooting on full manual controls with my D3100. I set shutter speed, aperture, ISO and white balance for every shot. I also purchased the superb Nikkor 35mm f1.8 prime lens and a Tamron 70-300 telephoto zoom lens. With my newly acquired knowledge about setting exposure, the images I am taking with the D3100 are excellent. Images taken with the prime lens are tack sharp, that lens is amazing. The Tamron set to 70 mm also takes sharp images (images taken with the Tamron at 70 mm are sharper than the kit lens and the Tamron does not get soft until 300mm). With just a little post processing (I am using the View NX software that came with the camera), I can get the images from the kit lens to look incredible. I am extremely satisfied with this camera and I highly recommend it.

What is the best instruments to take a good image?

The D3100 takes excellent images on automatic with the kit lens.

I learned photography in the early 1970's on a 35mm Miranda Sensorex SLR. Lost interest in the hobby for a long time, then got back into it in 2009. Wow, have things changed! I have been using a Panasonic LX3 since December 2009 with very good results (fast Leica glass on the LX3) and was ready to get back into an interchangeable lens camera. After doing a lot of hands on research, I decided on the D3100.I've had mine for two weeks now and for the most part, I am impressed. The D3100 takes excellent images on automatic with the kit lens. Composition is much easier with a proper viewfinder and the larger sensor makes obtaining shallow depth of field simple. My semi-pro photographer friends have all commented that my images with the D3100 are more creative, more artistic and much better than with the LX3.Personally, I can see the enhanced creativity in my D3100 images but I feel there is little difference in image quality between the two cameras. A bit of a disappointment on that regard (I was hoping for sharper images) but others who have viewed my images disagree with me, so maybe I am being overly critical. One thing I have discovered is the D3100's abilities far exceed mine when I take it off automatic - in other words, there is a steep learning curve going manual on this camera. I have a lot to learn about exposure so I feel that the D3100 will be a great tool to help me enhance my photographic skills.I am a bit disappointed in the build quality - the SD card door is flimsy and moves around a bit when closed, the lens creaks. The all metal LX3 has much better build quality than the D3100. To be fair, the D3100 has better build quality than the Canons I tested.The D3100 feels great in my hands and is very nice to use. The ergonomics are perfect. I tested the D5100 and the D90 as well as all the Canon Rebels. Of all of them, the D3100 felt the best.I considered getting the D5100 for its better sensor and screen, but the actual real world price difference was $400 (D5100 was being sold above sticker, D3100 was sold to me with a $100 Nikon rebate and an additional 10% discount from the retailer) and that was a significant savings.The 230k screen is adequate, not great, but acceptable.Overall, I am pleased. I am looking forward to learning how to get the most out of this camera and I definitely feel it will help me grow as a photographer.Update, 6/1/11: After reading Bryan Peterson's "Understanding Exposure", I am now shooting on full manual controls with my D3100. I set shutter speed, aperture, ISO and white balance for every shot. I also purchased the superb Nikkor 35mm f1.8 prime lens and a Tamron 70-300 telephoto zoom lens. With my newly acquired knowledge about setting exposure, the images I am taking with the D3100 are excellent. Images taken with the prime lens are tack sharp, that lens is amazing. The Tamron set to 70 mm also takes sharp images (images taken with the Tamron at 70 mm are sharper than the kit lens and the Tamron does not get soft until 300mm). With just a little post processing (I am using the View NX software that came with the camera), I can get the images from the kit lens to look incredible. I am extremely satisfied with this camera and I highly recommend it.

<hl> The D3100 <hl> takes excellent images on automatic with the kit lens.

I learned photography in the early 1970's on a 35mm Miranda Sensorex SLR. Lost interest in the hobby for a long time, then got back into it in 2009. Wow, have things changed! I have been using a Panasonic LX3 since December 2009 with very good results (fast Leica glass on the LX3) and was ready to get back into an interchangeable lens camera. After doing a lot of hands on research, I decided on the D3100.I've had mine for two weeks now and for the most part, I am impressed. <hl> The D3100 <hl> takes excellent images on automatic with the kit lens. Composition is much easier with a proper viewfinder and the larger sensor makes obtaining shallow depth of field simple. My semi-pro photographer friends have all commented that my images with the D3100 are more creative, more artistic and much better than with the LX3.Personally, I can see the enhanced creativity in my D3100 images but I feel there is little difference in image quality between the two cameras. A bit of a disappointment on that regard (I was hoping for sharper images) but others who have viewed my images disagree with me, so maybe I am being overly critical. One thing I have discovered is the D3100's abilities far exceed mine when I take it off automatic - in other words, there is a steep learning curve going manual on this camera. I have a lot to learn about exposure so I feel that the D3100 will be a great tool to help me enhance my photographic skills.I am a bit disappointed in the build quality - the SD card door is flimsy and moves around a bit when closed, the lens creaks. The all metal LX3 has much better build quality than the D3100. To be fair, the D3100 has better build quality than the Canons I tested.The D3100 feels great in my hands and is very nice to use. The ergonomics are perfect. I tested the D5100 and the D90 as well as all the Canon Rebels. Of all of them, the D3100 felt the best.I considered getting the D5100 for its better sensor and screen, but the actual real world price difference was $400 (D5100 was being sold above sticker, D3100 was sold to me with a $100 Nikon rebate and an additional 10% discount from the retailer) and that was a significant savings.The 230k screen is adequate, not great, but acceptable.Overall, I am pleased. I am looking forward to learning how to get the most out of this camera and I definitely feel it will help me grow as a photographer.Update, 6/1/11: After reading Bryan Peterson's "Understanding Exposure", I am now shooting on full manual controls with my D3100. I set shutter speed, aperture, ISO and white balance for every shot. I also purchased the superb Nikkor 35mm f1.8 prime lens and a Tamron 70-300 telephoto zoom lens. With my newly acquired knowledge about setting exposure, the images I am taking with the D3100 are excellent. Images taken with the prime lens are tack sharp, that lens is amazing. The Tamron set to 70 mm also takes sharp images (images taken with the Tamron at 70 mm are sharper than the kit lens and the Tamron does not get soft until 300mm). With just a little post processing (I am using the View NX software that came with the camera), I can get the images from the kit lens to look incredible. I am extremely satisfied with this camera and I highly recommend it.

I learned photography in the early 1970's on a 35mm Miranda Sensorex SLR. Lost interest in the hobby for a long time, then got back into it in 2009. Wow, have things changed! I have been using a Panasonic LX3 since December 2009 with very good results (fast Leica glass on the LX3) and was ready to get back into an interchangeable lens camera. After doing a lot of hands on research, I decided on the D3100.I've had mine for two weeks now and for the most part, I am impressed. <hl> The D3100 takes excellent images on automatic with the kit lens. <hl> Composition is much easier with a proper viewfinder and the larger sensor makes obtaining shallow depth of field simple. My semi-pro photographer friends have all commented that my images with the D3100 are more creative, more artistic and much better than with the LX3.Personally, I can see the enhanced creativity in my D3100 images but I feel there is little difference in image quality between the two cameras. A bit of a disappointment on that regard (I was hoping for sharper images) but others who have viewed my images disagree with me, so maybe I am being overly critical. One thing I have discovered is the D3100's abilities far exceed mine when I take it off automatic - in other words, there is a steep learning curve going manual on this camera. I have a lot to learn about exposure so I feel that the D3100 will be a great tool to help me enhance my photographic skills. I am a bit disappointed in the build quality - the SD card door is flimsy and moves around a bit when closed, the lens creaks. The all metal LX3 has much better build quality than the D3100. To be fair, the D3100 has better build quality than the Canons I tested. The D3100 feels great in my hands and is very nice to use. The ergonomics are perfect. I tested the D5100 and the D90 as well as all the Canon Rebels. Of all of them, the D3100 felt the best. I considered getting the D5100 for its better sensor and screen, but the actual real world price difference was $400 (D5100 was being sold above sticker, D3100 was sold to me with a $100 Nikon rebate and an additional 10% discount from the retailer) and that was a significant savings. The 230k screen is adequate, not great, but acceptable. Overall, I am pleased. I am looking forward to learning how to get the most out of this camera and I definitely feel it will help me grow as a photographer. Update, 6/1/11: After reading Bryan Peterson's "Understanding Exposure", I am now shooting on full manual controls with my D3100. I set shutter speed, aperture, ISO and white balance for every shot. I also purchased the superb Nikkor 35mm f1.8 prime lens and a Tamron 70-300 telephoto zoom lens. With my newly acquired knowledge about setting exposure, the images I am taking with the D3100 are excellent. Images taken with the prime lens are tack sharp, that lens is amazing. The Tamron set to 70 mm also takes sharp images (images taken with the Tamron at 70 mm are sharper than the kit lens and the Tamron does not get soft until 300mm). With just a little post processing (I am using the View NX software that came with the camera), I can get the images from the kit lens to look incredible. I am extremely satisfied with this camera and I highly recommend it.

0eb0dba352742b888bc904296f416af2

electronics

has good weight

question: How was the weight?, context: This is one of the best keyboards that I ever owned, so far, the design is sleek, is not ergonomic (nobody is perfect), but it has good weight, the space between keys is very good, it looks great and you don't need to worry about batteries anymore. The best part is, you don't need to put it under direct light to re-charge the batteries, if you have some sort of light source near to the keyboard, that's all it needs. I don't know about this product on the long term, it's been only one month since I bought it, but it has been working well so far. I'll change my review if I notice something bad about it, but for now, I just have to say "it's a really good product and I recommend it 100%". Hope this help.Just one comment about the receiver, it's better if you don't plug it behind your computer, if you have a front USB, use it, the reception it's a lot better.

How was the weight?

This is one of the best keyboards that I ever owned, so far, the design is sleek, is not ergonomic (nobody is perfect), but it has good weight , the space between keys is very good, it looks great and you don't need to worry about batteries anymore.

This is one of the best keyboards that I ever owned, so far, the design is sleek, is not ergonomic (nobody is perfect), but it has good weight, the space between keys is very good, it looks great and you don't need to worry about batteries anymore. The best part is, you don't need to put it under direct light to re-charge the batteries, if you have some sort of light source near to the keyboard, that's all it needs. I don't know about this product on the long term, it's been only one month since I bought it, but it has been working well so far. I'll change my review if I notice something bad about it, but for now, I just have to say "it's a really good product and I recommend it 100%". Hope this help.Just one comment about the receiver, it's better if you don't plug it behind your computer, if you have a front USB, use it, the reception it's a lot better.

This is one of the best keyboards that I ever owned, so far, the design is sleek, is not ergonomic (nobody is perfect), but it <hl> has good weight <hl> , the space between keys is very good, it looks great and you don't need to worry about batteries anymore.

This is one of the best keyboards that I ever owned, so far, the design is sleek, is not ergonomic (nobody is perfect), but it <hl> has good weight <hl>, the space between keys is very good, it looks great and you don't need to worry about batteries anymore. The best part is, you don't need to put it under direct light to re-charge the batteries, if you have some sort of light source near to the keyboard, that's all it needs. I don't know about this product on the long term, it's been only one month since I bought it, but it has been working well so far. I'll change my review if I notice something bad about it, but for now, I just have to say "it's a really good product and I recommend it 100%". Hope this help.Just one comment about the receiver, it's better if you don't plug it behind your computer, if you have a front USB, use it, the reception it's a lot better.

<hl> This is one of the best keyboards that I ever owned, so far, the design is sleek, is not ergonomic (nobody is perfect), but it has good weight , the space between keys is very good, it looks great and you don't need to worry about batteries anymore. <hl> The best part is, you don't need to put it under direct light to re-charge the batteries, if you have some sort of light source near to the keyboard, that's all it needs. I don't know about this product on the long term, it's been only one month since I bought it, but it has been working well so far. I'll change my review if I notice something bad about it, but for now, I just have to say "it's a really good product and I recommend it 100%". Hope this help. Just one comment about the receiver, it's better if you don't plug it behind your computer, if you have a front USB, use it, the reception it's a lot better.

baf9523d60838b12f1c5e06b772ff69d

electronics

For music and other audio content this little device is a great value

question: How is the player?, context: I purchased the 4GB version along with a 16GB Micro SD card - so 20GB memory for about $55. I like the interface - the navigation is simple and consistent between menus. The documentation is not really complete as the music content on the external card can be accessed from the Music menu - not just the card menu. The only limitation I've found is that playlists can only be stored on the internal memory.What I really like though is that I can select MP3 folders from the external memory card and then select shuffle at any level. So I can shuffle the entire card, a folder for one artist, one genre, etc. Or I can select one album and play or shuffle that. It nearly eliminates the need for playlists which is great since the internal memory is somewhat limited.Sound is good in the car and with earbuds. For music and other audio content this little device is a great value.

How is the player?

For music and other audio content this little device is a great value .

I purchased the 4GB version along with a 16GB Micro SD card - so 20GB memory for about $55. I like the interface - the navigation is simple and consistent between menus. The documentation is not really complete as the music content on the external card can be accessed from the Music menu - not just the card menu. The only limitation I've found is that playlists can only be stored on the internal memory.What I really like though is that I can select MP3 folders from the external memory card and then select shuffle at any level. So I can shuffle the entire card, a folder for one artist, one genre, etc. Or I can select one album and play or shuffle that. It nearly eliminates the need for playlists which is great since the internal memory is somewhat limited.Sound is good in the car and with earbuds. For music and other audio content this little device is a great value.

<hl> For music and other audio content this little device is a great value <hl> .

I purchased the 4GB version along with a 16GB Micro SD card - so 20GB memory for about $55. I like the interface - the navigation is simple and consistent between menus. The documentation is not really complete as the music content on the external card can be accessed from the Music menu - not just the card menu. The only limitation I've found is that playlists can only be stored on the internal memory.What I really like though is that I can select MP3 folders from the external memory card and then select shuffle at any level. So I can shuffle the entire card, a folder for one artist, one genre, etc. Or I can select one album and play or shuffle that. It nearly eliminates the need for playlists which is great since the internal memory is somewhat limited.Sound is good in the car and with earbuds. <hl> For music and other audio content this little device is a great value <hl>.

I purchased the 4GB version along with a 16GB Micro SD card - so 20GB memory for about $55. I like the interface - the navigation is simple and consistent between menus. The documentation is not really complete as the music content on the external card can be accessed from the Music menu - not just the card menu. The only limitation I've found is that playlists can only be stored on the internal memory. What I really like though is that I can select MP3 folders from the external memory card and then select shuffle at any level. So I can shuffle the entire card, a folder for one artist, one genre, etc. Or I can select one album and play or shuffle that. It nearly eliminates the need for playlists which is great since the internal memory is somewhat limited. Sound is good in the car and with earbuds. <hl> For music and other audio content this little device is a great value . <hl>

77f1482070c839c487bfd56d2ce7b20c

electronics

This tripod is nice for less than $40

question: Is a good tripod?, context: This tripod is nice for less than $40. For the cost, it is a great value. It comes with a nice carrying case and folds up easily for storage or transport. It provides a sturdy mount for a DSLR camera, but I use it to mount an off-camera flash unit. It works very well for this purpose.

Is a good tripod?

This tripod is nice for less than $40 .

This tripod is nice for less than $40. For the cost, it is a great value. It comes with a nice carrying case and folds up easily for storage or transport. It provides a sturdy mount for a DSLR camera, but I use it to mount an off-camera flash unit. It works very well for this purpose.

<hl> This tripod is nice for less than $40 <hl> .

<hl> This tripod is nice for less than $40 <hl>. For the cost, it is a great value. It comes with a nice carrying case and folds up easily for storage or transport. It provides a sturdy mount for a DSLR camera, but I use it to mount an off-camera flash unit. It works very well for this purpose.

<hl> This tripod is nice for less than $40 . <hl> For the cost, it is a great value. It comes with a nice carrying case and folds up easily for storage or transport. It provides a sturdy mount for a DSLR camera, but I use it to mount an off-camera flash unit. It works very well for this purpose.

9ffb620df0393093439cb2dca5040a4e

electronics

is very nice

question: How is the information?, context: Easy to program, works great with Mac IF you take the time to program and play with it. If you try to plug it in and rush through you may have a bad experience. The battery life is very nice, all things considered.

How is the information?

The battery life is very nice , all things considered.

Easy to program, works great with Mac IF you take the time to program and play with it. If you try to plug it in and rush through you may have a bad experience. The battery life is very nice, all things considered.

The battery life <hl> is very nice <hl> , all things considered.

Easy to program, works great with Mac IF you take the time to program and play with it. If you try to plug it in and rush through you may have a bad experience. The battery life <hl> is very nice <hl>, all things considered.

Easy to program, works great with Mac IF you take the time to program and play with it. If you try to plug it in and rush through you may have a bad experience. <hl> The battery life is very nice , all things considered. <hl>

b8e18fc1927ae080a7bf7771b899926a

electronics

the app allows you to type search items rather than hunt and peck with the arrow buttons of the remote

question: Why do I have intuitive control?, context: We bought the Roku for the bedroom as part of our cable cutting efforts. So far we love it. The menus are simple and easy to use. Setup was a breeze. It found the wireless without a problem and we never lose connection or lag or freeze up. We have had a lttle trouble with Netflix on it, but it seems to be a Netflix thing since all the other channels like Amazon worked fine. I would love to see more of the primetime channels like ABC and NBC have their own channels, but that is not a device concern. Got Hulu+ and there's not much TV we will miss at all. One of the best features for cable cutters is that the Roku Search works accross all your channels. So you type in the show or movie and it tells you every instance accross all your channels. Then you pick which one to watch it from. I even use the iPhone app for Roku to control the device. It is responsive and it is good to know that if we lose the included remote, we have a backup. Also, the app allows you to type search items rather than hunt and peck with the arrow buttons of the remote.

Why do I have intuitive control?

Also, the app allows you to type search items rather than hunt and peck with the arrow buttons of the remote .

We bought the Roku for the bedroom as part of our cable cutting efforts. So far we love it. The menus are simple and easy to use. Setup was a breeze. It found the wireless without a problem and we never lose connection or lag or freeze up. We have had a lttle trouble with Netflix on it, but it seems to be a Netflix thing since all the other channels like Amazon worked fine. I would love to see more of the primetime channels like ABC and NBC have their own channels, but that is not a device concern. Got Hulu+ and there's not much TV we will miss at all. One of the best features for cable cutters is that the Roku Search works accross all your channels. So you type in the show or movie and it tells you every instance accross all your channels. Then you pick which one to watch it from. I even use the iPhone app for Roku to control the device. It is responsive and it is good to know that if we lose the included remote, we have a backup. Also, the app allows you to type search items rather than hunt and peck with the arrow buttons of the remote.

Also, <hl> the app allows you to type search items rather than hunt and peck with the arrow buttons of the remote <hl> .

We bought the Roku for the bedroom as part of our cable cutting efforts. So far we love it. The menus are simple and easy to use. Setup was a breeze. It found the wireless without a problem and we never lose connection or lag or freeze up. We have had a lttle trouble with Netflix on it, but it seems to be a Netflix thing since all the other channels like Amazon worked fine. I would love to see more of the primetime channels like ABC and NBC have their own channels, but that is not a device concern. Got Hulu+ and there's not much TV we will miss at all. One of the best features for cable cutters is that the Roku Search works accross all your channels. So you type in the show or movie and it tells you every instance accross all your channels. Then you pick which one to watch it from. I even use the iPhone app for Roku to control the device. It is responsive and it is good to know that if we lose the included remote, we have a backup. Also, <hl> the app allows you to type search items rather than hunt and peck with the arrow buttons of the remote <hl>.

We bought the Roku for the bedroom as part of our cable cutting efforts. So far we love it. The menus are simple and easy to use. Setup was a breeze. It found the wireless without a problem and we never lose connection or lag or freeze up. We have had a lttle trouble with Netflix on it, but it seems to be a Netflix thing since all the other channels like Amazon worked fine. I would love to see more of the primetime channels like ABC and NBC have their own channels, but that is not a device concern. Got Hulu+ and there's not much TV we will miss at all. One of the best features for cable cutters is that the Roku Search works accross all your channels. So you type in the show or movie and it tells you every instance accross all your channels. Then you pick which one to watch it from. I even use the iPhone app for Roku to control the device. It is responsive and it is good to know that if we lose the included remote, we have a backup. <hl> Also, the app allows you to type search items rather than hunt and peck with the arrow buttons of the remote . <hl>

65e78449031a37bb34e4225ace52366c

electronics

the bass is practically non-existent

question: How is the bass?, context: Although the sound is nice and neutral, the bass is practically non-existent. The fit, with the right rubber socks, is fine. It stays in your ears while moving. I suppose you gets what you pays for.

How is the bass?

Although the sound is nice and neutral, the bass is practically non-existent .

Although the sound is nice and neutral, the bass is practically non-existent. The fit, with the right rubber socks, is fine. It stays in your ears while moving. I suppose you gets what you pays for.

Although the sound is nice and neutral, <hl> the bass is practically non-existent <hl> .

Although the sound is nice and neutral, <hl> the bass is practically non-existent <hl>. The fit, with the right rubber socks, is fine. It stays in your ears while moving. I suppose you gets what you pays for.

<hl> Although the sound is nice and neutral, the bass is practically non-existent . <hl> The fit, with the right rubber socks, is fine. It stays in your ears while moving. I suppose you gets what you pays for.

b75d1b4b72aa10f05dd187106266ae7b

electronics

produces high quality images

question: How is it the control?, context: I can't tell people enough how wonderful this camera is. It has a huge viewing screen, simple controls, and produces high quality images. People are amazed with the photos I take with it. The Stabilizer it worth it's weight in gold. When taking low light shots, it really shines. No blurry photos with this camera. The night time setting with the moon on it is amazing for taking photos of the moon, or city lights. Make sure you read the manual or you will overlook tons of features.

How is it the control?

It has a huge viewing screen, simple controls, and produces high quality images .

I can't tell people enough how wonderful this camera is. It has a huge viewing screen, simple controls, and produces high quality images. People are amazed with the photos I take with it. The Stabilizer it worth it's weight in gold. When taking low light shots, it really shines. No blurry photos with this camera. The night time setting with the moon on it is amazing for taking photos of the moon, or city lights. Make sure you read the manual or you will overlook tons of features.

It has a huge viewing screen, simple controls, and <hl> produces high quality images <hl> .

I can't tell people enough how wonderful this camera is. It has a huge viewing screen, simple controls, and <hl> produces high quality images <hl>. People are amazed with the photos I take with it. The Stabilizer it worth it's weight in gold. When taking low light shots, it really shines. No blurry photos with this camera. The night time setting with the moon on it is amazing for taking photos of the moon, or city lights. Make sure you read the manual or you will overlook tons of features.

I can't tell people enough how wonderful this camera is. <hl> It has a huge viewing screen, simple controls, and produces high quality images . <hl> People are amazed with the photos I take with it. The Stabilizer it worth it's weight in gold. When taking low light shots, it really shines. No blurry photos with this camera. The night time setting with the moon on it is amazing for taking photos of the moon, or city lights. Make sure you read the manual or you will overlook tons of features.

3aeddfeab570798a0daaa856108d67b4

electronics

think this is a great

question: How is processor?, context: I've been an iPad user since the original came out. I also have an iPad 3. I have worked in IT for the past few years so I would say I am pretty good with technology and fancy new devices. With that introduction out of the way, I will be reviewing key points that I have seen touched upon in other reviews. Here goes...BUILDThe device feels nice and solid. I'm a little surprised at how heavy it is, but that's not necessarily a bad thing. The rubberized backing is always nice for added grip. It's not as nice as say unibody aluminum, but it's not $500 either.SCREENThe screen is fantastic. But my problem is the same as when iPad got Retina Display, other than the OS, most apps look rather pixelated. A lot of the games I tried are not high definition, at least not high enough to look smooth on this screen. Hopefully apps get updated to higher resolutions.LOCK SCREEN ADSYeah there are ads on my lock screen. I'm not sure why this is such a big deal. How much time do people really spend looking at the lock screen? The first thing I thought when I saw the ads is WOW the pictures are really crisp! The ads are there to subsidize some of the $200 price tag. I might pay the $15 to get rid of them so I can customize it, but I might not. I feel like this has been blown out of proportion by other customers.SOUNDThe sound from the speakers is great. Much better than you would get from more expensive devices, very crisp and clean. I have the official Amazon case on and it has not affected the sound at all. Nothing much else to say, I doubt anyone will complain about this.CRASHINGI've had two apps crash on opening. I don't know if it is the app or the OS. It's probably somewhere in the middle. Again, not a big deal for me. If it crashes, then I just tap it again and it works. I've also watched a few movies using the built in player as well as Netflix and Amazon Prime. No crashes for me at all. I'm sure OS stability will be improved as time goes on.OVERALL SATISFACTIONCompared to my iPad 3, obviously the Fire HD is not as "good" so to speak. I mainly got it because I wanted something smaller. I also mainly used the iPad to surf the web, watch videos, and play some simple games. The Fire HD accomplishes this and does so much more. If you are expecting an iPad killer, or a desktop replacement, or a productivity machine, then you should look elsewhere.I bought this to be a media device, and I believe that is what Amazon meant this to be. In this regard, I think this is a great device. In fact, I decided to keep this and sell my iPad 3, which will give me another $200+ to spend on other things. Just remember, this device is not for everyone. If you want a media device, you will be happy with this. Do not expect an iPad for $200.UPDATE 9/18/12Just wanted to add a few more things I have noticed over the past 24 hours.- Power/Volume Buttons: There are a bit hard to press, which is somewhat alleviated by having the official case. Maybe it's because I'm a longtime iPad user, but this will definitely take some getting used to.- Screen Glare: It took me a little while to notice, but I was playing a Seek & Find game while on Caltrain, with the bright Palo Alto sun shining right on me, and didn't have any trouble seeing the screen. I remembered that Amazon mentioned how the screen was changed to reduce glare, and they did an amazing job.UPDATE 9/20/12Two days later and I am still very happy with the device. Here are some more thoughts from me:BATTERY LIFEI have been playing Enigmatis (a hidden object game) for about an hour and a half each day on my commute. This drains about 15 - 20% of the battery with the screen brightness almost at the highest setting. Again, not iPad gold standard, but still very good.SYNCING MUSICI have a Samsung Galaxy S3 and used an app called Easy Phone Transfer to get all my music from iTunes onto the phone. It transferred everything, including album covers, and I was hoping to find something like that for this device. I tried iSyncr, a $3 app, which did the job, but did not sync over album covers. I uploaded all my music into the Cloud, then downloaded it from Amazon, which increased the audio quality for a lot of my songs and added artwork, but this still did not show up on the device.I got very frustrated getting all the album artwork over and eventually just gave up. It's not a big deal but I am kind of anal about those kinds of things. Just a heads up if anyone else out there is crazy about it like I am.UPDATE 09/21/12I got a call from Amazon Customer Service about this review, which surprised me very much. They advised me the best way to get the artwork to show up is have the songs in both the Cloud Player as well as the device, which I know does work fine. I was hoping to have the artwork show without needing things in the Cloud, but not a big deal any more.I am more impressed with the fact that Amazon called me to give me advice on how to remedy the situation and ask if there were any other questions I had on the Kindle. The representative said he wanted to make sure I was happy with the Fire HD. This is one of the big reasons I went with the Kindle, and with Amazon in general. I have had great experiences with their customer service, who have always been able to handle my issues quickly and efficiently. No need to set up an appointment days later with a wannabe IT guy with a hugely overstated job title.So this update is not really for the device itself, but sometimes it's not just the device, it's the company that offers it that makes a difference. This is why I no longer have any Apple devices, as cool as they may be. But it's not 100% gravy, as I have noticed lately that the keyboard keeps popping up randomly on screens where there is nowhere to enter text, ie. while playing a game. I just have to press the Back arrow to get rid of it, but maybe a bug the Amazon engineers want to take a look at.UPDATE 10/05/12So I don't know if it was always there, but over this past weekend I noticed a dead pixel on my Kindle's screen. I called Kindle Support and after a short 5 minute call, they sent me a new Kindle, no questions asked. So once again, very happy with Amazon customer service. I am still very happy with the device, and have some more thoughts on it:HDMI CONNECTIONI bought an HDMI cable to hook up the Fire to my 46" Samsung and was quite impressed with the results. The quality was very good, not Bluray quality of course, but better than SDTV on an HD screen. You actually see every single thing you do on the big screen, like you are using a giant Kindle.GOOGLE PLAY APPSOne of the main drawbacks in my opinion is, or should I say was, the lack of all the Google Play apps available on the Kindle. With a little research, I found out how to add apps that are not available in the Amazon store. It is pretty easy to do and works very well with the apps I tried. This greatly improves my opinion of the Fire HD.PLASTIC AROUND THE SCREENThe outer most edges of the Kindle are plastic. I noticed some kind of discoloration on the corner of mine, and just thought it was some dirt to scratch off. So I rubbed my thumb nail on the area, and noticed there were visible marks on the plastic. It appears this plastic can scratch some what easily, but I think this is just cosmetic as not of the plastic actually flaked. If you are not very anal about how your stuff looks, you probably won't notice it.OS CHANGESHere are two small gripes I have with the OS that I'm sure could be fixed with an OS update:- Battery Meter: It would be nice if the battery meter could show percentage instead of just a graphic bar. Some people have mentioned Battery HD, but you still have to swipe down to see the percentage, so this makes it easier but does not solve the issue I had.- Personal Videos: The mp4 videos I put on the device are located in the "Personal Videos" app, which shows screen shots of all the videos I put in. The problem is, all that is shown are the screen shots. You can get more info by holding your finger down on each video, but when you have multiple seasons of a show on the Kindle, it can get confusing. Ideally we should be able to look at videos in a list like our music.UPDATE 11/15/12Still very happy with the device. Here are some more thoughts:LEFT HAND MODEI did't think this would be a problem until I played a Solitaire game that DID have a left-handed mode. As a lefty who usually uses the Fire in landscape, I often have to reach across the screen to access the Settings or Home button in the menu. It's a small grievance, but can be really annoying when watching a movie or reading something. If there was an option for a left-handed layout with the menus on the left side of the device, that would be great.PERSONAL VIDEOS APPI had earlier complained about this app, as it did not list my movies and crashed playing a pair of them. I recently drove down to LA from SF, and put 5 movies on device, only to find that 4 of them would not play! I was pretty mad, until I remembered a simple solution, download another app. I downloaded Avia Media Player, which is not the greatest either, but it played all the movies I put on the Kindle. My faith was restored.GOOGLE PLAY APPSA lot of people have asked how to do this. If you are not having luck with Google searches, try this:[...]

How is processor?

In this regard, I think this is a great device.

I've been an iPad user since the original came out. I also have an iPad 3. I have worked in IT for the past few years so I would say I am pretty good with technology and fancy new devices. With that introduction out of the way, I will be reviewing key points that I have seen touched upon in other reviews. Here goes...BUILDThe device feels nice and solid. I'm a little surprised at how heavy it is, but that's not necessarily a bad thing. The rubberized backing is always nice for added grip. It's not as nice as say unibody aluminum, but it's not $500 either.SCREENThe screen is fantastic. But my problem is the same as when iPad got Retina Display, other than the OS, most apps look rather pixelated. A lot of the games I tried are not high definition, at least not high enough to look smooth on this screen. Hopefully apps get updated to higher resolutions.LOCK SCREEN ADSYeah there are ads on my lock screen. I'm not sure why this is such a big deal. How much time do people really spend looking at the lock screen? The first thing I thought when I saw the ads is WOW the pictures are really crisp! The ads are there to subsidize some of the $200 price tag. I might pay the $15 to get rid of them so I can customize it, but I might not. I feel like this has been blown out of proportion by other customers.SOUNDThe sound from the speakers is great. Much better than you would get from more expensive devices, very crisp and clean. I have the official Amazon case on and it has not affected the sound at all. Nothing much else to say, I doubt anyone will complain about this.CRASHINGI've had two apps crash on opening. I don't know if it is the app or the OS. It's probably somewhere in the middle. Again, not a big deal for me. If it crashes, then I just tap it again and it works. I've also watched a few movies using the built in player as well as Netflix and Amazon Prime. No crashes for me at all. I'm sure OS stability will be improved as time goes on.OVERALL SATISFACTIONCompared to my iPad 3, obviously the Fire HD is not as "good" so to speak. I mainly got it because I wanted something smaller. I also mainly used the iPad to surf the web, watch videos, and play some simple games. The Fire HD accomplishes this and does so much more. If you are expecting an iPad killer, or a desktop replacement, or a productivity machine, then you should look elsewhere.I bought this to be a media device, and I believe that is what Amazon meant this to be. In this regard, I think this is a great device. In fact, I decided to keep this and sell my iPad 3, which will give me another $200+ to spend on other things. Just remember, this device is not for everyone. If you want a media device, you will be happy with this. Do not expect an iPad for $200.UPDATE 9/18/12Just wanted to add a few more things I have noticed over the past 24 hours.- Power/Volume Buttons: There are a bit hard to press, which is somewhat alleviated by having the official case. Maybe it's because I'm a longtime iPad user, but this will definitely take some getting used to.- Screen Glare: It took me a little while to notice, but I was playing a Seek & Find game while on Caltrain, with the bright Palo Alto sun shining right on me, and didn't have any trouble seeing the screen. I remembered that Amazon mentioned how the screen was changed to reduce glare, and they did an amazing job.UPDATE 9/20/12Two days later and I am still very happy with the device. Here are some more thoughts from me:BATTERY LIFEI have been playing Enigmatis (a hidden object game) for about an hour and a half each day on my commute. This drains about 15 - 20% of the battery with the screen brightness almost at the highest setting. Again, not iPad gold standard, but still very good.SYNCING MUSICI have a Samsung Galaxy S3 and used an app called Easy Phone Transfer to get all my music from iTunes onto the phone. It transferred everything, including album covers, and I was hoping to find something like that for this device. I tried iSyncr, a $3 app, which did the job, but did not sync over album covers. I uploaded all my music into the Cloud, then downloaded it from Amazon, which increased the audio quality for a lot of my songs and added artwork, but this still did not show up on the device.I got very frustrated getting all the album artwork over and eventually just gave up. It's not a big deal but I am kind of anal about those kinds of things. Just a heads up if anyone else out there is crazy about it like I am.UPDATE 09/21/12I got a call from Amazon Customer Service about this review, which surprised me very much. They advised me the best way to get the artwork to show up is have the songs in both the Cloud Player as well as the device, which I know does work fine. I was hoping to have the artwork show without needing things in the Cloud, but not a big deal any more.I am more impressed with the fact that Amazon called me to give me advice on how to remedy the situation and ask if there were any other questions I had on the Kindle. The representative said he wanted to make sure I was happy with the Fire HD. This is one of the big reasons I went with the Kindle, and with Amazon in general. I have had great experiences with their customer service, who have always been able to handle my issues quickly and efficiently. No need to set up an appointment days later with a wannabe IT guy with a hugely overstated job title.So this update is not really for the device itself, but sometimes it's not just the device, it's the company that offers it that makes a difference. This is why I no longer have any Apple devices, as cool as they may be. But it's not 100% gravy, as I have noticed lately that the keyboard keeps popping up randomly on screens where there is nowhere to enter text, ie. while playing a game. I just have to press the Back arrow to get rid of it, but maybe a bug the Amazon engineers want to take a look at.UPDATE 10/05/12So I don't know if it was always there, but over this past weekend I noticed a dead pixel on my Kindle's screen. I called Kindle Support and after a short 5 minute call, they sent me a new Kindle, no questions asked. So once again, very happy with Amazon customer service. I am still very happy with the device, and have some more thoughts on it:HDMI CONNECTIONI bought an HDMI cable to hook up the Fire to my 46" Samsung and was quite impressed with the results. The quality was very good, not Bluray quality of course, but better than SDTV on an HD screen. You actually see every single thing you do on the big screen, like you are using a giant Kindle.GOOGLE PLAY APPSOne of the main drawbacks in my opinion is, or should I say was, the lack of all the Google Play apps available on the Kindle. With a little research, I found out how to add apps that are not available in the Amazon store. It is pretty easy to do and works very well with the apps I tried. This greatly improves my opinion of the Fire HD.PLASTIC AROUND THE SCREENThe outer most edges of the Kindle are plastic. I noticed some kind of discoloration on the corner of mine, and just thought it was some dirt to scratch off. So I rubbed my thumb nail on the area, and noticed there were visible marks on the plastic. It appears this plastic can scratch some what easily, but I think this is just cosmetic as not of the plastic actually flaked. If you are not very anal about how your stuff looks, you probably won't notice it.OS CHANGESHere are two small gripes I have with the OS that I'm sure could be fixed with an OS update:- Battery Meter: It would be nice if the battery meter could show percentage instead of just a graphic bar. Some people have mentioned Battery HD, but you still have to swipe down to see the percentage, so this makes it easier but does not solve the issue I had.- Personal Videos: The mp4 videos I put on the device are located in the "Personal Videos" app, which shows screen shots of all the videos I put in. The problem is, all that is shown are the screen shots. You can get more info by holding your finger down on each video, but when you have multiple seasons of a show on the Kindle, it can get confusing. Ideally we should be able to look at videos in a list like our music.UPDATE 11/15/12Still very happy with the device. Here are some more thoughts:LEFT HAND MODEI did't think this would be a problem until I played a Solitaire game that DID have a left-handed mode. As a lefty who usually uses the Fire in landscape, I often have to reach across the screen to access the Settings or Home button in the menu. It's a small grievance, but can be really annoying when watching a movie or reading something. If there was an option for a left-handed layout with the menus on the left side of the device, that would be great.PERSONAL VIDEOS APPI had earlier complained about this app, as it did not list my movies and crashed playing a pair of them. I recently drove down to LA from SF, and put 5 movies on device, only to find that 4 of them would not play! I was pretty mad, until I remembered a simple solution, download another app. I downloaded Avia Media Player, which is not the greatest either, but it played all the movies I put on the Kindle. My faith was restored.GOOGLE PLAY APPSA lot of people have asked how to do this. If you are not having luck with Google searches, try this:[...]

In this regard, I <hl> think this is a great <hl> device.

I've been an iPad user since the original came out. I also have an iPad 3. I have worked in IT for the past few years so I would say I am pretty good with technology and fancy new devices. With that introduction out of the way, I will be reviewing key points that I have seen touched upon in other reviews. Here goes...BUILDThe device feels nice and solid. I'm a little surprised at how heavy it is, but that's not necessarily a bad thing. The rubberized backing is always nice for added grip. It's not as nice as say unibody aluminum, but it's not $500 either.SCREENThe screen is fantastic. But my problem is the same as when iPad got Retina Display, other than the OS, most apps look rather pixelated. A lot of the games I tried are not high definition, at least not high enough to look smooth on this screen. Hopefully apps get updated to higher resolutions.LOCK SCREEN ADSYeah there are ads on my lock screen. I'm not sure why this is such a big deal. How much time do people really spend looking at the lock screen? The first thing I thought when I saw the ads is WOW the pictures are really crisp! The ads are there to subsidize some of the $200 price tag. I might pay the $15 to get rid of them so I can customize it, but I might not. I feel like this has been blown out of proportion by other customers.SOUNDThe sound from the speakers is great. Much better than you would get from more expensive devices, very crisp and clean. I have the official Amazon case on and it has not affected the sound at all. Nothing much else to say, I doubt anyone will complain about this.CRASHINGI've had two apps crash on opening. I don't know if it is the app or the OS. It's probably somewhere in the middle. Again, not a big deal for me. If it crashes, then I just tap it again and it works. I've also watched a few movies using the built in player as well as Netflix and Amazon Prime. No crashes for me at all. I'm sure OS stability will be improved as time goes on.OVERALL SATISFACTIONCompared to my iPad 3, obviously the Fire HD is not as "good" so to speak. I mainly got it because I wanted something smaller. I also mainly used the iPad to surf the web, watch videos, and play some simple games. The Fire HD accomplishes this and does so much more. If you are expecting an iPad killer, or a desktop replacement, or a productivity machine, then you should look elsewhere.I bought this to be a media device, and I believe that is what Amazon meant this to be. In this regard, I <hl> think this is a great <hl> device. In fact, I decided to keep this and sell my iPad 3, which will give me another $200+ to spend on other things. Just remember, this device is not for everyone. If you want a media device, you will be happy with this. Do not expect an iPad for $200.UPDATE 9/18/12Just wanted to add a few more things I have noticed over the past 24 hours.- Power/Volume Buttons: There are a bit hard to press, which is somewhat alleviated by having the official case. Maybe it's because I'm a longtime iPad user, but this will definitely take some getting used to.- Screen Glare: It took me a little while to notice, but I was playing a Seek & Find game while on Caltrain, with the bright Palo Alto sun shining right on me, and didn't have any trouble seeing the screen. I remembered that Amazon mentioned how the screen was changed to reduce glare, and they did an amazing job.UPDATE 9/20/12Two days later and I am still very happy with the device. Here are some more thoughts from me:BATTERY LIFEI have been playing Enigmatis (a hidden object game) for about an hour and a half each day on my commute. This drains about 15 - 20% of the battery with the screen brightness almost at the highest setting. Again, not iPad gold standard, but still very good.SYNCING MUSICI have a Samsung Galaxy S3 and used an app called Easy Phone Transfer to get all my music from iTunes onto the phone. It transferred everything, including album covers, and I was hoping to find something like that for this device. I tried iSyncr, a $3 app, which did the job, but did not sync over album covers. I uploaded all my music into the Cloud, then downloaded it from Amazon, which increased the audio quality for a lot of my songs and added artwork, but this still did not show up on the device.I got very frustrated getting all the album artwork over and eventually just gave up. It's not a big deal but I am kind of anal about those kinds of things. Just a heads up if anyone else out there is crazy about it like I am.UPDATE 09/21/12I got a call from Amazon Customer Service about this review, which surprised me very much. They advised me the best way to get the artwork to show up is have the songs in both the Cloud Player as well as the device, which I know does work fine. I was hoping to have the artwork show without needing things in the Cloud, but not a big deal any more.I am more impressed with the fact that Amazon called me to give me advice on how to remedy the situation and ask if there were any other questions I had on the Kindle. The representative said he wanted to make sure I was happy with the Fire HD. This is one of the big reasons I went with the Kindle, and with Amazon in general. I have had great experiences with their customer service, who have always been able to handle my issues quickly and efficiently. No need to set up an appointment days later with a wannabe IT guy with a hugely overstated job title.So this update is not really for the device itself, but sometimes it's not just the device, it's the company that offers it that makes a difference. This is why I no longer have any Apple devices, as cool as they may be. But it's not 100% gravy, as I have noticed lately that the keyboard keeps popping up randomly on screens where there is nowhere to enter text, ie. while playing a game. I just have to press the Back arrow to get rid of it, but maybe a bug the Amazon engineers want to take a look at.UPDATE 10/05/12So I don't know if it was always there, but over this past weekend I noticed a dead pixel on my Kindle's screen. I called Kindle Support and after a short 5 minute call, they sent me a new Kindle, no questions asked. So once again, very happy with Amazon customer service. I am still very happy with the device, and have some more thoughts on it:HDMI CONNECTIONI bought an HDMI cable to hook up the Fire to my 46" Samsung and was quite impressed with the results. The quality was very good, not Bluray quality of course, but better than SDTV on an HD screen. You actually see every single thing you do on the big screen, like you are using a giant Kindle.GOOGLE PLAY APPSOne of the main drawbacks in my opinion is, or should I say was, the lack of all the Google Play apps available on the Kindle. With a little research, I found out how to add apps that are not available in the Amazon store. It is pretty easy to do and works very well with the apps I tried. This greatly improves my opinion of the Fire HD.PLASTIC AROUND THE SCREENThe outer most edges of the Kindle are plastic. I noticed some kind of discoloration on the corner of mine, and just thought it was some dirt to scratch off. So I rubbed my thumb nail on the area, and noticed there were visible marks on the plastic. It appears this plastic can scratch some what easily, but I think this is just cosmetic as not of the plastic actually flaked. If you are not very anal about how your stuff looks, you probably won't notice it.OS CHANGESHere are two small gripes I have with the OS that I'm sure could be fixed with an OS update:- Battery Meter: It would be nice if the battery meter could show percentage instead of just a graphic bar. Some people have mentioned Battery HD, but you still have to swipe down to see the percentage, so this makes it easier but does not solve the issue I had.- Personal Videos: The mp4 videos I put on the device are located in the "Personal Videos" app, which shows screen shots of all the videos I put in. The problem is, all that is shown are the screen shots. You can get more info by holding your finger down on each video, but when you have multiple seasons of a show on the Kindle, it can get confusing. Ideally we should be able to look at videos in a list like our music.UPDATE 11/15/12Still very happy with the device. Here are some more thoughts:LEFT HAND MODEI did't think this would be a problem until I played a Solitaire game that DID have a left-handed mode. As a lefty who usually uses the Fire in landscape, I often have to reach across the screen to access the Settings or Home button in the menu. It's a small grievance, but can be really annoying when watching a movie or reading something. If there was an option for a left-handed layout with the menus on the left side of the device, that would be great.PERSONAL VIDEOS APPI had earlier complained about this app, as it did not list my movies and crashed playing a pair of them. I recently drove down to LA from SF, and put 5 movies on device, only to find that 4 of them would not play! I was pretty mad, until I remembered a simple solution, download another app. I downloaded Avia Media Player, which is not the greatest either, but it played all the movies I put on the Kindle. My faith was restored.GOOGLE PLAY APPSA lot of people have asked how to do this. If you are not having luck with Google searches, try this:[...]

I've been an iPad user since the original came out. I also have an iPad 3. I have worked in IT for the past few years so I would say I am pretty good with technology and fancy new devices. With that introduction out of the way, I will be reviewing key points that I have seen touched upon in other reviews. Here goes... BUILDThe device feels nice and solid. I'm a little surprised at how heavy it is, but that's not necessarily a bad thing. The rubberized backing is always nice for added grip. It's not as nice as say unibody aluminum, but it's not $500 either. SCREENThe screen is fantastic. But my problem is the same as when iPad got Retina Display, other than the OS, most apps look rather pixelated. A lot of the games I tried are not high definition, at least not high enough to look smooth on this screen. Hopefully apps get updated to higher resolutions. LOCK SCREEN ADSYeah there are ads on my lock screen. I'm not sure why this is such a big deal. How much time do people really spend looking at the lock screen? The first thing I thought when I saw the ads is WOW the pictures are really crisp! The ads are there to subsidize some of the $200 price tag. I might pay the $15 to get rid of them so I can customize it, but I might not. I feel like this has been blown out of proportion by other customers. SOUNDThe sound from the speakers is great. Much better than you would get from more expensive devices, very crisp and clean. I have the official Amazon case on and it has not affected the sound at all. Nothing much else to say, I doubt anyone will complain about this. CRASHINGI've had two apps crash on opening. I don't know if it is the app or the OS. It's probably somewhere in the middle. Again, not a big deal for me. If it crashes, then I just tap it again and it works. I've also watched a few movies using the built in player as well as Netflix and Amazon Prime. No crashes for me at all. I'm sure OS stability will be improved as time goes on. OVERALL SATISFACTIONCompared to my iPad 3, obviously the Fire HD is not as "good" so to speak. I mainly got it because I wanted something smaller. I also mainly used the iPad to surf the web, watch videos, and play some simple games. The Fire HD accomplishes this and does so much more. If you are expecting an iPad killer, or a desktop replacement, or a productivity machine, then you should look elsewhere. I bought this to be a media device, and I believe that is what Amazon meant this to be. <hl> In this regard, I think this is a great device. <hl> In fact, I decided to keep this and sell my iPad 3, which will give me another $200+ to spend on other things. Just remember, this device is not for everyone. If you want a media device, you will be happy with this. Do not expect an iPad for $200.UPDATE 9/18/12Just wanted to add a few more things I have noticed over the past 24 hours.- Power/Volume Buttons: There are a bit hard to press, which is somewhat alleviated by having the official case. Maybe it's because I'm a longtime iPad user, but this will definitely take some getting used to.- Screen Glare: It took me a little while to notice, but I was playing a Seek & Find game while on Caltrain, with the bright Palo Alto sun shining right on me, and didn't have any trouble seeing the screen. I remembered that Amazon mentioned how the screen was changed to reduce glare, and they did an amazing job. UPDATE 9/20/12Two days later and I am still very happy with the device. Here are some more thoughts from me:BATTERY LIFEI have been playing Enigmatis (a hidden object game) for about an hour and a half each day on my commute. This drains about 15 - 20% of the battery with the screen brightness almost at the highest setting. Again, not iPad gold standard, but still very good. SYNCING MUSICI have a Samsung Galaxy S3 and used an app called Easy Phone Transfer to get all my music from iTunes onto the phone. It transferred everything, including album covers, and I was hoping to find something like that for this device. I tried iSyncr, a $3 app, which did the job, but did not sync over album covers. I uploaded all my music into the Cloud, then downloaded it from Amazon, which increased the audio quality for a lot of my songs and added artwork, but this still did not show up on the device. I got very frustrated getting all the album artwork over and eventually just gave up. It's not a big deal but I am kind of anal about those kinds of things. Just a heads up if anyone else out there is crazy about it like I am. UPDATE 09/21/12I got a call from Amazon Customer Service about this review, which surprised me very much. They advised me the best way to get the artwork to show up is have the songs in both the Cloud Player as well as the device, which I know does work fine. I was hoping to have the artwork show without needing things in the Cloud, but not a big deal any more. I am more impressed with the fact that Amazon called me to give me advice on how to remedy the situation and ask if there were any other questions I had on the Kindle. The representative said he wanted to make sure I was happy with the Fire HD. This is one of the big reasons I went with the Kindle, and with Amazon in general. I have had great experiences with their customer service, who have always been able to handle my issues quickly and efficiently. No need to set up an appointment days later with a wannabe IT guy with a hugely overstated job title. So this update is not really for the device itself, but sometimes it's not just the device, it's the company that offers it that makes a difference. This is why I no longer have any Apple devices, as cool as they may be. But it's not 100% gravy, as I have noticed lately that the keyboard keeps popping up randomly on screens where there is nowhere to enter text, ie. while playing a game. I just have to press the Back arrow to get rid of it, but maybe a bug the Amazon engineers want to take a look at. UPDATE 10/05/12So I don't know if it was always there, but over this past weekend I noticed a dead pixel on my Kindle's screen. I called Kindle Support and after a short 5 minute call, they sent me a new Kindle, no questions asked. So once again, very happy with Amazon customer service. I am still very happy with the device, and have some more thoughts on it:HDMI CONNECTIONI bought an HDMI cable to hook up the Fire to my 46" Samsung and was quite impressed with the results. The quality was very good, not Bluray quality of course, but better than SDTV on an HD screen. You actually see every single thing you do on the big screen, like you are using a giant Kindle. GOOGLE PLAY APPSOne of the main drawbacks in my opinion is, or should I say was, the lack of all the Google Play apps available on the Kindle. With a little research, I found out how to add apps that are not available in the Amazon store. It is pretty easy to do and works very well with the apps I tried. This greatly improves my opinion of the Fire HD.PLASTIC AROUND THE SCREENThe outer most edges of the Kindle are plastic. I noticed some kind of discoloration on the corner of mine, and just thought it was some dirt to scratch off. So I rubbed my thumb nail on the area, and noticed there were visible marks on the plastic. It appears this plastic can scratch some what easily, but I think this is just cosmetic as not of the plastic actually flaked. If you are not very anal about how your stuff looks, you probably won't notice it. OS CHANGESHere are two small gripes I have with the OS that I'm sure could be fixed with an OS update:- Battery Meter: It would be nice if the battery meter could show percentage instead of just a graphic bar. Some people have mentioned Battery HD, but you still have to swipe down to see the percentage, so this makes it easier but does not solve the issue I had.- Personal Videos: The mp4 videos I put on the device are located in the "Personal Videos" app, which shows screen shots of all the videos I put in. The problem is, all that is shown are the screen shots. You can get more info by holding your finger down on each video, but when you have multiple seasons of a show on the Kindle, it can get confusing. Ideally we should be able to look at videos in a list like our music. UPDATE 11/15/12Still very happy with the device. Here are some more thoughts:LEFT HAND MODEI did't think this would be a problem until I played a Solitaire game that DID have a left-handed mode. As a lefty who usually uses the Fire in landscape, I often have to reach across the screen to access the Settings or Home button in the menu. It's a small grievance, but can be really annoying when watching a movie or reading something. If there was an option for a left-handed layout with the menus on the left side of the device, that would be great. PERSONAL VIDEOS APPI had earlier complained about this app, as it did not list my movies and crashed playing a pair of them. I recently drove down to LA from SF, and put 5 movies on device, only to find that 4 of them would not play! I was pretty mad, until I remembered a simple solution, download another app. I downloaded Avia Media Player, which is not the greatest either, but it played all the movies I put on the Kindle. My faith was restored. GOOGLE PLAY APPSA lot of people have asked how to do this. If you are not having luck with Google searches, try this:[...]

c687cef56ac10872ef5d0ae0869650db

electronics

the remote with the

question: How is the option?, context: I haven't had any problems with the Roku 3. It was very easy to hook up. I followed the instructions on how to pair the remote with the Roku and everything went fine. We have a Roku 2XS and the Roku 3 has a few features that the 2 doesn't have.

How is the option?

I followed the instructions on how to pair the remote with the Roku and everything went fine.

I haven't had any problems with the Roku 3. It was very easy to hook up. I followed the instructions on how to pair the remote with the Roku and everything went fine. We have a Roku 2XS and the Roku 3 has a few features that the 2 doesn't have.

I followed the instructions on how to pair <hl> the remote with the <hl> Roku and everything went fine.

I haven't had any problems with the Roku 3. It was very easy to hook up. I followed the instructions on how to pair <hl> the remote with the <hl> Roku and everything went fine. We have a Roku 2XS and the Roku 3 has a few features that the 2 doesn't have.

I haven't had any problems with the Roku 3. It was very easy to hook up. <hl> I followed the instructions on how to pair the remote with the Roku and everything went fine. <hl> We have a Roku 2XS and the Roku 3 has a few features that the 2 doesn't have.

0ed0128c4235f602d5f5e666337cd68f

electronics

Image quality at lower ISOs is excellent

question: What was the best result?, context: The Sony RX100 is a great camera overall, but has some weaknesses in the performance area that take some of the shine away from the overall shooting experience.Image quality at lower ISOs is excellent. Sharp, detailed, good dynamic range. There are two issues I have with this camera, however. First off, it has a tendency to overexpose and clip highlights. Secondly, while it keeps noise at bay through ISO1600, it seems to do this through very aggressive noise reduction at ISO800 and beyond, taking a toll on fine detail. The Olympus XZ-2 on the other hand, has more noise at ISO800 but also more detail. Personally, I like cameras that retain fine detail better and don't mind a little noise. But to say that the RX100 is an open and shut case as far as IQ is concerned (when compared to its competitors)...not quite.I am not particularly thrilled about the F4.9 at the telephoto end but the lens has nice characteristics otherwise so I really don't see that as a negative overall. What is a negative overall is how long it takes for the lens to zoom in and out and it's loud when it does it.The autofocus performance on this camera is somewhat disappointing in low-light. It's fine in the daytime but in low-light it's almost as slow as the much less-expensive Powershot S100. Also I had issues with the image stabilization is not great on the camera for some reason. I found in a lot of instances that you had to hold onto the camera very tightly in order to get a blur-free shot. I think that is inexcusable for a $650 camera.Some people have commented on the battery life of this camera. It's not the greatest but that's one of the trade-offs you have to make with a small pocket camera. Your best bet is just to get an extra battery.The LCD screen on back is very nice being somewhat viewable in direct sunlight. The menu system on the camera is a very nice and more straight-forward than other Sony cameras that I've used. The dial up front doesn't have decisive clicks that the Powershot S100 has but it's still nice to have considering that some enthusiast cameras don't have it at all.Ergonomics-wise, I think this camera could use some improvement. The shiny metal body is slippery up front and could benefit from some sort of grip or textured surface to make the camera more secure in your hand.Video generally looks nice, I haven't tested it much. But it generally is sharp and the audio sounds good.I think the RX100 was a respectable first compact enthusiast camera for Sony. And indeed, it's remarkable they were able to take a relatively large sensor and put it in such a compact light-weight camera. It's image quality is a cut above any enthusiast compact out there. But it has some performance-related issues that need refinement. Not terrible, but it could have been better on a $650 camera. Overall though, a great first enthusiast compact from Sony.

What was the best result?

Image quality at lower ISOs is excellent .

The Sony RX100 is a great camera overall, but has some weaknesses in the performance area that take some of the shine away from the overall shooting experience.Image quality at lower ISOs is excellent. Sharp, detailed, good dynamic range. There are two issues I have with this camera, however. First off, it has a tendency to overexpose and clip highlights. Secondly, while it keeps noise at bay through ISO1600, it seems to do this through very aggressive noise reduction at ISO800 and beyond, taking a toll on fine detail. The Olympus XZ-2 on the other hand, has more noise at ISO800 but also more detail. Personally, I like cameras that retain fine detail better and don't mind a little noise. But to say that the RX100 is an open and shut case as far as IQ is concerned (when compared to its competitors)...not quite.I am not particularly thrilled about the F4.9 at the telephoto end but the lens has nice characteristics otherwise so I really don't see that as a negative overall. What is a negative overall is how long it takes for the lens to zoom in and out and it's loud when it does it.The autofocus performance on this camera is somewhat disappointing in low-light. It's fine in the daytime but in low-light it's almost as slow as the much less-expensive Powershot S100. Also I had issues with the image stabilization is not great on the camera for some reason. I found in a lot of instances that you had to hold onto the camera very tightly in order to get a blur-free shot. I think that is inexcusable for a $650 camera.Some people have commented on the battery life of this camera. It's not the greatest but that's one of the trade-offs you have to make with a small pocket camera. Your best bet is just to get an extra battery.The LCD screen on back is very nice being somewhat viewable in direct sunlight. The menu system on the camera is a very nice and more straight-forward than other Sony cameras that I've used. The dial up front doesn't have decisive clicks that the Powershot S100 has but it's still nice to have considering that some enthusiast cameras don't have it at all.Ergonomics-wise, I think this camera could use some improvement. The shiny metal body is slippery up front and could benefit from some sort of grip or textured surface to make the camera more secure in your hand.Video generally looks nice, I haven't tested it much. But it generally is sharp and the audio sounds good.I think the RX100 was a respectable first compact enthusiast camera for Sony. And indeed, it's remarkable they were able to take a relatively large sensor and put it in such a compact light-weight camera. It's image quality is a cut above any enthusiast compact out there. But it has some performance-related issues that need refinement. Not terrible, but it could have been better on a $650 camera. Overall though, a great first enthusiast compact from Sony.

<hl> Image quality at lower ISOs is excellent <hl> .

The Sony RX100 is a great camera overall, but has some weaknesses in the performance area that take some of the shine away from the overall shooting experience.<hl> Image quality at lower ISOs is excellent <hl>. Sharp, detailed, good dynamic range. There are two issues I have with this camera, however. First off, it has a tendency to overexpose and clip highlights. Secondly, while it keeps noise at bay through ISO1600, it seems to do this through very aggressive noise reduction at ISO800 and beyond, taking a toll on fine detail. The Olympus XZ-2 on the other hand, has more noise at ISO800 but also more detail. Personally, I like cameras that retain fine detail better and don't mind a little noise. But to say that the RX100 is an open and shut case as far as IQ is concerned (when compared to its competitors)...not quite.I am not particularly thrilled about the F4.9 at the telephoto end but the lens has nice characteristics otherwise so I really don't see that as a negative overall. What is a negative overall is how long it takes for the lens to zoom in and out and it's loud when it does it.The autofocus performance on this camera is somewhat disappointing in low-light. It's fine in the daytime but in low-light it's almost as slow as the much less-expensive Powershot S100. Also I had issues with the image stabilization is not great on the camera for some reason. I found in a lot of instances that you had to hold onto the camera very tightly in order to get a blur-free shot. I think that is inexcusable for a $650 camera.Some people have commented on the battery life of this camera. It's not the greatest but that's one of the trade-offs you have to make with a small pocket camera. Your best bet is just to get an extra battery.The LCD screen on back is very nice being somewhat viewable in direct sunlight. The menu system on the camera is a very nice and more straight-forward than other Sony cameras that I've used. The dial up front doesn't have decisive clicks that the Powershot S100 has but it's still nice to have considering that some enthusiast cameras don't have it at all.Ergonomics-wise, I think this camera could use some improvement. The shiny metal body is slippery up front and could benefit from some sort of grip or textured surface to make the camera more secure in your hand.Video generally looks nice, I haven't tested it much. But it generally is sharp and the audio sounds good.I think the RX100 was a respectable first compact enthusiast camera for Sony. And indeed, it's remarkable they were able to take a relatively large sensor and put it in such a compact light-weight camera. It's image quality is a cut above any enthusiast compact out there. But it has some performance-related issues that need refinement. Not terrible, but it could have been better on a $650 camera. Overall though, a great first enthusiast compact from Sony.

The Sony RX100 is a great camera overall, but has some weaknesses in the performance area that take some of the shine away from the overall shooting experience. <hl> Image quality at lower ISOs is excellent . <hl> Sharp, detailed, good dynamic range. There are two issues I have with this camera, however. First off, it has a tendency to overexpose and clip highlights. Secondly, while it keeps noise at bay through ISO1600, it seems to do this through very aggressive noise reduction at ISO800 and beyond, taking a toll on fine detail. The Olympus XZ-2 on the other hand, has more noise at ISO800 but also more detail. Personally, I like cameras that retain fine detail better and don't mind a little noise. But to say that the RX100 is an open and shut case as far as IQ is concerned (when compared to its competitors)...not quite. I am not particularly thrilled about the F4.9 at the telephoto end but the lens has nice characteristics otherwise so I really don't see that as a negative overall. What is a negative overall is how long it takes for the lens to zoom in and out and it's loud when it does it. The autofocus performance on this camera is somewhat disappointing in low-light. It's fine in the daytime but in low-light it's almost as slow as the much less-expensive Powershot S100. Also I had issues with the image stabilization is not great on the camera for some reason. I found in a lot of instances that you had to hold onto the camera very tightly in order to get a blur-free shot. I think that is inexcusable for a $650 camera. Some people have commented on the battery life of this camera. It's not the greatest but that's one of the trade-offs you have to make with a small pocket camera. Your best bet is just to get an extra battery. The LCD screen on back is very nice being somewhat viewable in direct sunlight. The menu system on the camera is a very nice and more straight-forward than other Sony cameras that I've used. The dial up front doesn't have decisive clicks that the Powershot S100 has but it's still nice to have considering that some enthusiast cameras don't have it at all. Ergonomics-wise, I think this camera could use some improvement. The shiny metal body is slippery up front and could benefit from some sort of grip or textured surface to make the camera more secure in your hand. Video generally looks nice, I haven't tested it much. But it generally is sharp and the audio sounds good. I think the RX100 was a respectable first compact enthusiast camera for Sony. And indeed, it's remarkable they were able to take a relatively large sensor and put it in such a compact light-weight camera. It's image quality is a cut above any enthusiast compact out there. But it has some performance-related issues that need refinement. Not terrible, but it could have been better on a $650 camera. Overall though, a great first enthusiast compact from Sony.

260d33a7e2073c34289dcb1a534e2c8d

electronics

received that is very small

question: How to receiver size?, context: I absolutely love this mouse....it tracks well and I love the unifying received that is very small. The mouse fits my hand perfectly...very comfortable to use for long periods of time. I love the long battery life too...I highly recommend this mouse to anyone!

How to receiver size?

I absolutely love this mouse....it tracks well and I love the unifying received that is very small .

I absolutely love this mouse....it tracks well and I love the unifying received that is very small. The mouse fits my hand perfectly...very comfortable to use for long periods of time. I love the long battery life too...I highly recommend this mouse to anyone!

I absolutely love this mouse....it tracks well and I love the unifying <hl> received that is very small <hl> .

I absolutely love this mouse....it tracks well and I love the unifying <hl> received that is very small <hl>. The mouse fits my hand perfectly...very comfortable to use for long periods of time. I love the long battery life too...I highly recommend this mouse to anyone!

<hl> I absolutely love this mouse....it tracks well and I love the unifying received that is very small . <hl> The mouse fits my hand perfectly...very comfortable to use for long periods of time. I love the long battery life too...I highly recommend this mouse to anyone!

589bab8b3d8677f3fba345e67c9e0879

electronics

I have big fingers and need keys that are spaced

question: How long are those finger?, context: I tried this out because it would be nice to see the keys in the dark (I always hate when I can't see the keys at night), but I don't care for the design. There is not enough space in between the keys, and the keys feel like those of a laptop. What I mean by that is that they aren't raised high enough. I have big fingers and need keys that are spaced far enough apart and that are raised somewhat so it's comfortable to work with. I'll stick to my old board.

How long are those finger?

I have big fingers and need keys that are spaced far enough apart

I tried this out because it would be nice to see the keys in the dark (I always hate when I can't see the keys at night), but I don't care for the design. There is not enough space in between the keys, and the keys feel like those of a laptop. What I mean by that is that they aren't raised high enough. I have big fingers and need keys that are spaced far enough apart and that are raised somewhat so it's comfortable to work with. I'll stick to my old board.

<hl> I have big fingers and need keys that are spaced <hl> far enough apart

I tried this out because it would be nice to see the keys in the dark (I always hate when I can't see the keys at night), but I don't care for the design. There is not enough space in between the keys, and the keys feel like those of a laptop. What I mean by that is that they aren't raised high enough. <hl> I have big fingers and need keys that are spaced <hl> far enough apart and that are raised somewhat so it's comfortable to work with. I'll stick to my old board.

I tried this out because it would be nice to see the keys in the dark (I always hate when I can't see the keys at night), but I don't care for the design. There is not enough space in between the keys, and the keys feel like those of a laptop. What I mean by that is that they aren't raised high enough. <hl> I have big fingers and need keys that are spaced far enough apart <hl> and that are raised somewhat so it's comfortable to work with. I'll stick to my old board.

532744b61c81a70ee1c9bdcb689786d1

electronics

The sound is rich, deep and bassy when needed

question: Why do I have an incredible sound?, context: My days as a real audiophile have long since passed, but let me say, this speaker/sub woofer set is "SUCH A DEAL" I think you'd be hard pressed to find a better value for the price. The sound is rich, deep and bassy when needed. Love it!

Why do I have an incredible sound?

The sound is rich, deep and bassy when needed .

My days as a real audiophile have long since passed, but let me say, this speaker/sub woofer set is "SUCH A DEAL" I think you'd be hard pressed to find a better value for the price. The sound is rich, deep and bassy when needed. Love it!

<hl> The sound is rich, deep and bassy when needed <hl> .

My days as a real audiophile have long since passed, but let me say, this speaker/sub woofer set is "SUCH A DEAL" I think you'd be hard pressed to find a better value for the price. <hl> The sound is rich, deep and bassy when needed <hl>. Love it!

My days as a real audiophile have long since passed, but let me say, this speaker/sub woofer set is "SUCH A DEAL" I think you'd be hard pressed to find a better value for the price. <hl> The sound is rich, deep and bassy when needed . <hl> Love it!

d94d9b05211171f44b0b2674938d1bbf

electronics

The camera is awesome

question: How is the camera?, context: I have a different lens, but I'm sure the standard is good for most people... The camera is awesome.

How is the camera?

I have a different lens, but I'm sure the standard is good for most people... The camera is awesome .

I have a different lens, but I'm sure the standard is good for most people... The camera is awesome.

I have a different lens, but I'm sure the standard is good for most people... <hl> The camera is awesome <hl> .

I have a different lens, but I'm sure the standard is good for most people... <hl> The camera is awesome <hl>.

<hl> I have a different lens, but I'm sure the standard is good for most people... The camera is awesome . <hl>

2e6fe2ad241fab845a42caf2b285780d

electronics

the price is amazing

question: How is the price?, context: I have a Sony a33 SLT camera and I've used a 32Gig one of these for about 2 years and have not had any problems with it. I just bought a second one because my wife bought a camera that uses one of these cards and I think a 32GB card is good enough to have for a good 2-week vacation without need to remove/delete pics. Not to mention that the price is amazing.

How is the price?

Not to mention that the price is amazing .

I have a Sony a33 SLT camera and I've used a 32Gig one of these for about 2 years and have not had any problems with it. I just bought a second one because my wife bought a camera that uses one of these cards and I think a 32GB card is good enough to have for a good 2-week vacation without need to remove/delete pics. Not to mention that the price is amazing.

Not to mention that <hl> the price is amazing <hl> .

I have a Sony a33 SLT camera and I've used a 32Gig one of these for about 2 years and have not had any problems with it. I just bought a second one because my wife bought a camera that uses one of these cards and I think a 32GB card is good enough to have for a good 2-week vacation without need to remove/delete pics. Not to mention that <hl> the price is amazing <hl>.

I have a Sony a33 SLT camera and I've used a 32Gig one of these for about 2 years and have not had any problems with it. I just bought a second one because my wife bought a camera that uses one of these cards and I think a 32GB card is good enough to have for a good 2-week vacation without need to remove/delete pics. <hl> Not to mention that the price is amazing . <hl>

6fa0ece30cff3bfb2c539c223fb529c8

electronics

The trade in of a shiny screen for protection

question: How is the instruction?, context: Keeps the grease and fingerprints away for sure! The trade in of a shiny screen for protection and non-greasy screen is well worth it. You never need to clean your screen again on your leg, knee, cuff of your shirt or paper towel. These screen protectors are perfect! Easy to apply and are a great fit to the screen.

How is the instruction?

Keeps the grease and fingerprints away for sure! The trade in of a shiny screen for protection and non-greasy screen is well worth it.

Keeps the grease and fingerprints away for sure! The trade in of a shiny screen for protection and non-greasy screen is well worth it. You never need to clean your screen again on your leg, knee, cuff of your shirt or paper towel. These screen protectors are perfect! Easy to apply and are a great fit to the screen.

Keeps the grease and fingerprints away for sure! <hl> The trade in of a shiny screen for protection <hl> and non-greasy screen is well worth it.

Keeps the grease and fingerprints away for sure! <hl> The trade in of a shiny screen for protection <hl> and non-greasy screen is well worth it. You never need to clean your screen again on your leg, knee, cuff of your shirt or paper towel. These screen protectors are perfect! Easy to apply and are a great fit to the screen.

<hl> Keeps the grease and fingerprints away for sure! The trade in of a shiny screen for protection and non-greasy screen is well worth it. <hl> You never need to clean your screen again on your leg, knee, cuff of your shirt or paper towel. These screen protectors are perfect! Easy to apply and are a great fit to the screen.

ff2bd8e0dfe5e3c065a1a2019e680a6b

electronics

their hardware is good

question: How is the hardware?, context: the issue with this package is that from the camcorder to the PC, the picture is quite good. That is, their hardware is good and it shows up on the screen as a good picture. So when you watch it live it looks good. Now, the problem comes in when you record it using their encoders. The package lets you save it avi or mp4 but when you play back, it's not quite as good as the signal coming from the camcorder. I'm still tinkering with it, but I get better recordings when I use Screencast-o'matic ($15 pro version) to capture the video and audio as it shows up on my high resolution monitor.

How is the hardware?

That is, their hardware is good and it shows up on the screen as a good picture.

the issue with this package is that from the camcorder to the PC, the picture is quite good. That is, their hardware is good and it shows up on the screen as a good picture. So when you watch it live it looks good. Now, the problem comes in when you record it using their encoders. The package lets you save it avi or mp4 but when you play back, it's not quite as good as the signal coming from the camcorder. I'm still tinkering with it, but I get better recordings when I use Screencast-o'matic ($15 pro version) to capture the video and audio as it shows up on my high resolution monitor.

That is, <hl> their hardware is good <hl> and it shows up on the screen as a good picture.

the issue with this package is that from the camcorder to the PC, the picture is quite good. That is, <hl> their hardware is good <hl> and it shows up on the screen as a good picture. So when you watch it live it looks good. Now, the problem comes in when you record it using their encoders. The package lets you save it avi or mp4 but when you play back, it's not quite as good as the signal coming from the camcorder. I'm still tinkering with it, but I get better recordings when I use Screencast-o'matic ($15 pro version) to capture the video and audio as it shows up on my high resolution monitor.

the issue with this package is that from the camcorder to the PC, the picture is quite good. <hl> That is, their hardware is good and it shows up on the screen as a good picture. <hl> So when you watch it live it looks good. Now, the problem comes in when you record it using their encoders. The package lets you save it avi or mp4 but when you play back, it's not quite as good as the signal coming from the camcorder. I'm still tinkering with it, but I get better recordings when I use Screencast-o'matic ($15 pro version) to capture the video and audio as it shows up on my high resolution monitor.

27ac65d0129d0cba22ef062dfafe2e2f

electronics

As the number of wireless devices increased in the house (smart phones, iPods, several laptops, an E-reader, the Wii... you get the picture) I started getting complaints about dropped connections and/or the router being frozen

question: How are have multiple devices trying?, context: I have the luxury of working from home and I need a fast, reliable wireless router with good wireless coverage. My old D-Link DIR-615 was fast enough but I was never really happy with the wireless coverage. We have a 2 story home and as long as you were on the same floor, you were OK, but the other floor was spotty at best.The other problem I had with the old router was the limited number of concurrent connections it supported. As the number of wireless devices increased in the house (smart phones, iPods, several laptops, an E-reader, the Wii... you get the picture) I started getting complaints about dropped connections and/or the router being frozen.After researching what was available and working well for others, I settled on the Asus RT-N56U. The Asus has all the features I need such as high concurrent connection limits and extended range in the 2.4 GHz band (the band I use with my work laptop).So far, I couldn't be happier. The unit was easy to setup and plugged into my home network (wired and wireless) with zero issues. My work laptop now gets 5 bar - excellent coverage on both floors of my home and we have no issues with dropped connections or router hangs.We have connected the following wireless devices to the Asus with no issues:- iPhone 4s- Motorola Atrix- Blackberry Bold- iPod touch- Epson Workforce635- MacBook Pro (uses the 5 Ghz band)- Dell laptops (Win xp and Win 7)- Nook color- Wii- Samsung Blu-ray- Asus TF300 Tablet- Nokia Lumina 900- iPhone 5- iPad miniThe unit came with an older firmware, but it was painless to upgrade to the latest. I simply downloaded the latest firmware from Asus to a PC and then upgraded the router via the admin web interface.My only complaint is the bandwidth graphs don't show traffic by device. Instead, you can see the traffic by total, wired, 2.4 GHz wireless and 5 GHz wireless.One final note. I use the Cisco VPN client on my laptop to connect to the office and it has worked flawlessly since day 1. No changes required to the client, work or the router.Update 6/11/12Just a quick update to add a couple of new devices that work flawlessly with the Asus router. We've added an Asus tablet and a Nokia phone to our stable of wireless devices. This router still rocks and delivers consistent performance despite the growing load.Update 6/22/13Another quick update to add/change devices. My wife replaced her Atrix with an iPhone 5. The iPhone 5 supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands. She is using it on the 2.4 band. We also added an iPad mini to the mix so the kids will let me use my Asus tablet. Even with these new devices, the Asus router is handling the load without issues! It's just a great little unit for what we use it for.

How are have multiple devices trying?

As the number of wireless devices increased in the house (smart phones, iPods, several laptops, an E-reader, the Wii... you get the picture) I started getting complaints about dropped connections and/or the router being frozen .After researching what was available and working well for others, I settled on the Asus RT-N56U. The Asus has all the features I need such as high concurrent connection limits and extended range in the 2.4 GHz band (the band I use with my work laptop).So far, I couldn't be happier.

I have the luxury of working from home and I need a fast, reliable wireless router with good wireless coverage. My old D-Link DIR-615 was fast enough but I was never really happy with the wireless coverage. We have a 2 story home and as long as you were on the same floor, you were OK, but the other floor was spotty at best.The other problem I had with the old router was the limited number of concurrent connections it supported. As the number of wireless devices increased in the house (smart phones, iPods, several laptops, an E-reader, the Wii... you get the picture) I started getting complaints about dropped connections and/or the router being frozen.After researching what was available and working well for others, I settled on the Asus RT-N56U. The Asus has all the features I need such as high concurrent connection limits and extended range in the 2.4 GHz band (the band I use with my work laptop).So far, I couldn't be happier. The unit was easy to setup and plugged into my home network (wired and wireless) with zero issues. My work laptop now gets 5 bar - excellent coverage on both floors of my home and we have no issues with dropped connections or router hangs.We have connected the following wireless devices to the Asus with no issues:- iPhone 4s- Motorola Atrix- Blackberry Bold- iPod touch- Epson Workforce635- MacBook Pro (uses the 5 Ghz band)- Dell laptops (Win xp and Win 7)- Nook color- Wii- Samsung Blu-ray- Asus TF300 Tablet- Nokia Lumina 900- iPhone 5- iPad miniThe unit came with an older firmware, but it was painless to upgrade to the latest. I simply downloaded the latest firmware from Asus to a PC and then upgraded the router via the admin web interface.My only complaint is the bandwidth graphs don't show traffic by device. Instead, you can see the traffic by total, wired, 2.4 GHz wireless and 5 GHz wireless.One final note. I use the Cisco VPN client on my laptop to connect to the office and it has worked flawlessly since day 1. No changes required to the client, work or the router.Update 6/11/12Just a quick update to add a couple of new devices that work flawlessly with the Asus router. We've added an Asus tablet and a Nokia phone to our stable of wireless devices. This router still rocks and delivers consistent performance despite the growing load.Update 6/22/13Another quick update to add/change devices. My wife replaced her Atrix with an iPhone 5. The iPhone 5 supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands. She is using it on the 2.4 band. We also added an iPad mini to the mix so the kids will let me use my Asus tablet. Even with these new devices, the Asus router is handling the load without issues! It's just a great little unit for what we use it for.

<hl> As the number of wireless devices increased in the house (smart phones, iPods, several laptops, an E-reader, the Wii... you get the picture) I started getting complaints about dropped connections and/or the router being frozen <hl> .After researching what was available and working well for others, I settled on the Asus RT-N56U. The Asus has all the features I need such as high concurrent connection limits and extended range in the 2.4 GHz band (the band I use with my work laptop).So far, I couldn't be happier.

I have the luxury of working from home and I need a fast, reliable wireless router with good wireless coverage. My old D-Link DIR-615 was fast enough but I was never really happy with the wireless coverage. We have a 2 story home and as long as you were on the same floor, you were OK, but the other floor was spotty at best.The other problem I had with the old router was the limited number of concurrent connections it supported. <hl> As the number of wireless devices increased in the house (smart phones, iPods, several laptops, an E-reader, the Wii... you get the picture) I started getting complaints about dropped connections and/or the router being frozen <hl>.After researching what was available and working well for others, I settled on the Asus RT-N56U. The Asus has all the features I need such as high concurrent connection limits and extended range in the 2.4 GHz band (the band I use with my work laptop).So far, I couldn't be happier. The unit was easy to setup and plugged into my home network (wired and wireless) with zero issues. My work laptop now gets 5 bar - excellent coverage on both floors of my home and we have no issues with dropped connections or router hangs.We have connected the following wireless devices to the Asus with no issues:- iPhone 4s- Motorola Atrix- Blackberry Bold- iPod touch- Epson Workforce635- MacBook Pro (uses the 5 Ghz band)- Dell laptops (Win xp and Win 7)- Nook color- Wii- Samsung Blu-ray- Asus TF300 Tablet- Nokia Lumina 900- iPhone 5- iPad miniThe unit came with an older firmware, but it was painless to upgrade to the latest. I simply downloaded the latest firmware from Asus to a PC and then upgraded the router via the admin web interface.My only complaint is the bandwidth graphs don't show traffic by device. Instead, you can see the traffic by total, wired, 2.4 GHz wireless and 5 GHz wireless.One final note. I use the Cisco VPN client on my laptop to connect to the office and it has worked flawlessly since day 1. No changes required to the client, work or the router.Update 6/11/12Just a quick update to add a couple of new devices that work flawlessly with the Asus router. We've added an Asus tablet and a Nokia phone to our stable of wireless devices. This router still rocks and delivers consistent performance despite the growing load.Update 6/22/13Another quick update to add/change devices. My wife replaced her Atrix with an iPhone 5. The iPhone 5 supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands. She is using it on the 2.4 band. We also added an iPad mini to the mix so the kids will let me use my Asus tablet. Even with these new devices, the Asus router is handling the load without issues! It's just a great little unit for what we use it for.

I have the luxury of working from home and I need a fast, reliable wireless router with good wireless coverage. My old D-Link DIR-615 was fast enough but I was never really happy with the wireless coverage. We have a 2 story home and as long as you were on the same floor, you were OK, but the other floor was spotty at best. The other problem I had with the old router was the limited number of concurrent connections it supported. <hl> As the number of wireless devices increased in the house (smart phones, iPods, several laptops, an E-reader, the Wii... you get the picture) I started getting complaints about dropped connections and/or the router being frozen .After researching what was available and working well for others, I settled on the Asus RT-N56U. The Asus has all the features I need such as high concurrent connection limits and extended range in the 2.4 GHz band (the band I use with my work laptop).So far, I couldn't be happier. <hl> The unit was easy to setup and plugged into my home network (wired and wireless) with zero issues. My work laptop now gets 5 bar - excellent coverage on both floors of my home and we have no issues with dropped connections or router hangs. We have connected the following wireless devices to the Asus with no issues:- iPhone 4s- Motorola Atrix- Blackberry Bold- iPod touch- Epson Workforce635- MacBook Pro (uses the 5 Ghz band)- Dell laptops (Win xp and Win 7)- Nook color- Wii- Samsung Blu-ray- Asus TF300 Tablet- Nokia Lumina 900- iPhone 5- iPad miniThe unit came with an older firmware, but it was painless to upgrade to the latest. I simply downloaded the latest firmware from Asus to a PC and then upgraded the router via the admin web interface. My only complaint is the bandwidth graphs don't show traffic by device. Instead, you can see the traffic by total, wired, 2.4 GHz wireless and 5 GHz wireless. One final note. I use the Cisco VPN client on my laptop to connect to the office and it has worked flawlessly since day 1. No changes required to the client, work or the router. Update 6/11/12Just a quick update to add a couple of new devices that work flawlessly with the Asus router. We've added an Asus tablet and a Nokia phone to our stable of wireless devices. This router still rocks and delivers consistent performance despite the growing load. Update 6/22/13Another quick update to add/change devices. My wife replaced her Atrix with an iPhone 5. The iPhone 5 supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands. She is using it on the 2.4 band. We also added an iPad mini to the mix so the kids will let me use my Asus tablet. Even with these new devices, the Asus router is handling the load without issues! It's just a great little unit for what we use it for.

a7160ea7763b9e6044baf95df08bdd62

electronics

quality is also lacking

question: Is quality good?, context: These caught my eye when shopping for new buds because of the Android control. While the control capabilities is nice (in theory), the sound quality, durability, and actual ability to control playback makes me happy I bought these well below retail price.As far as sound quality, I would place these in the realm of $20-$30 Skullcandy earbuds. They produce absolutely no bass with any music, and podcasts sound extremely tinny. The drivers are so light that I realized out of the box these would not impress. I have used higher priced Klipsch before, and these had none of the full sound previous pairs had. I am currently using Bose IE2 earbuds as well, and moving back and forth from the Bose to these it surprises me how much cleaner the Bose sound.The build quality is also lacking. I would qualify the build as better than cheap Skullcandy earbuds, but I expect these to shred apart in less than 6 months after careful use. The shielding around the wires is thin, and the connection point to the buds feel like they will either loosen too much or the shielding will wear away at the bud contact points. The "remote" portion is not as solidly built as can be, but the one control button has a good click to it. Overall a cheap feel.The actual fit is not bad at all. There are multiple tips, so one is bound to fit properly, and they do a decent job of isolating sound from a tight seal in the ear.The actual control of an Android phone (Droid Incredible 2) is spotty. The app to fully utilize these has a decent amount of setup options for only having one button to use. Sometimes the earbuds control spot on, sometimes I accidentally hang up on a phone call by mistake. There seems to be noticeable lag or non-responsiveness with button presses at times, and was verified to work the in the same spotty nature on a Galaxy Nexus as well. I would have loved a separate set of volume up/down buttons, instead of having to long hold the button to go from lowest volume to loudest without any accuracy. On a positive note, basic interface works on iPods/iPhones as well, with the ability to play/pause as well as start up voice control.Call quality is pretty impressive overall. People on the other end sound fine through the headset, although a bit hollow and distant sounding. I have been told after multiple calls that the quality of my voice through the microphone sounds good, even with me leaving the mic portion hang naturally from the cord without me holding it. The only negative about the mic is that is seems prone to pic up ambient noise as well as wind, but in a quieter indoor environment there were no issues.With a limited supply of controllable earbuds for Android, these may fit your need. They do work, but do not expect anything more than a passable experience and barely passable sound quality. The $99.99 asking price is outrageous. I bought these for $65, and I am questioning my purchase.

Is quality good?

The build quality is also lacking .

These caught my eye when shopping for new buds because of the Android control. While the control capabilities is nice (in theory), the sound quality, durability, and actual ability to control playback makes me happy I bought these well below retail price.As far as sound quality, I would place these in the realm of $20-$30 Skullcandy earbuds. They produce absolutely no bass with any music, and podcasts sound extremely tinny. The drivers are so light that I realized out of the box these would not impress. I have used higher priced Klipsch before, and these had none of the full sound previous pairs had. I am currently using Bose IE2 earbuds as well, and moving back and forth from the Bose to these it surprises me how much cleaner the Bose sound.The build quality is also lacking. I would qualify the build as better than cheap Skullcandy earbuds, but I expect these to shred apart in less than 6 months after careful use. The shielding around the wires is thin, and the connection point to the buds feel like they will either loosen too much or the shielding will wear away at the bud contact points. The "remote" portion is not as solidly built as can be, but the one control button has a good click to it. Overall a cheap feel.The actual fit is not bad at all. There are multiple tips, so one is bound to fit properly, and they do a decent job of isolating sound from a tight seal in the ear.The actual control of an Android phone (Droid Incredible 2) is spotty. The app to fully utilize these has a decent amount of setup options for only having one button to use. Sometimes the earbuds control spot on, sometimes I accidentally hang up on a phone call by mistake. There seems to be noticeable lag or non-responsiveness with button presses at times, and was verified to work the in the same spotty nature on a Galaxy Nexus as well. I would have loved a separate set of volume up/down buttons, instead of having to long hold the button to go from lowest volume to loudest without any accuracy. On a positive note, basic interface works on iPods/iPhones as well, with the ability to play/pause as well as start up voice control.Call quality is pretty impressive overall. People on the other end sound fine through the headset, although a bit hollow and distant sounding. I have been told after multiple calls that the quality of my voice through the microphone sounds good, even with me leaving the mic portion hang naturally from the cord without me holding it. The only negative about the mic is that is seems prone to pic up ambient noise as well as wind, but in a quieter indoor environment there were no issues.With a limited supply of controllable earbuds for Android, these may fit your need. They do work, but do not expect anything more than a passable experience and barely passable sound quality. The $99.99 asking price is outrageous. I bought these for $65, and I am questioning my purchase.

The build <hl> quality is also lacking <hl> .

These caught my eye when shopping for new buds because of the Android control. While the control capabilities is nice (in theory), the sound quality, durability, and actual ability to control playback makes me happy I bought these well below retail price.As far as sound quality, I would place these in the realm of $20-$30 Skullcandy earbuds. They produce absolutely no bass with any music, and podcasts sound extremely tinny. The drivers are so light that I realized out of the box these would not impress. I have used higher priced Klipsch before, and these had none of the full sound previous pairs had. I am currently using Bose IE2 earbuds as well, and moving back and forth from the Bose to these it surprises me how much cleaner the Bose sound.The build <hl> quality is also lacking <hl>. I would qualify the build as better than cheap Skullcandy earbuds, but I expect these to shred apart in less than 6 months after careful use. The shielding around the wires is thin, and the connection point to the buds feel like they will either loosen too much or the shielding will wear away at the bud contact points. The "remote" portion is not as solidly built as can be, but the one control button has a good click to it. Overall a cheap feel.The actual fit is not bad at all. There are multiple tips, so one is bound to fit properly, and they do a decent job of isolating sound from a tight seal in the ear.The actual control of an Android phone (Droid Incredible 2) is spotty. The app to fully utilize these has a decent amount of setup options for only having one button to use. Sometimes the earbuds control spot on, sometimes I accidentally hang up on a phone call by mistake. There seems to be noticeable lag or non-responsiveness with button presses at times, and was verified to work the in the same spotty nature on a Galaxy Nexus as well. I would have loved a separate set of volume up/down buttons, instead of having to long hold the button to go from lowest volume to loudest without any accuracy. On a positive note, basic interface works on iPods/iPhones as well, with the ability to play/pause as well as start up voice control.Call quality is pretty impressive overall. People on the other end sound fine through the headset, although a bit hollow and distant sounding. I have been told after multiple calls that the quality of my voice through the microphone sounds good, even with me leaving the mic portion hang naturally from the cord without me holding it. The only negative about the mic is that is seems prone to pic up ambient noise as well as wind, but in a quieter indoor environment there were no issues.With a limited supply of controllable earbuds for Android, these may fit your need. They do work, but do not expect anything more than a passable experience and barely passable sound quality. The $99.99 asking price is outrageous. I bought these for $65, and I am questioning my purchase.

These caught my eye when shopping for new buds because of the Android control. While the control capabilities is nice (in theory), the sound quality, durability, and actual ability to control playback makes me happy I bought these well below retail price. As far as sound quality, I would place these in the realm of $20-$30 Skullcandy earbuds. They produce absolutely no bass with any music, and podcasts sound extremely tinny. The drivers are so light that I realized out of the box these would not impress. I have used higher priced Klipsch before, and these had none of the full sound previous pairs had. I am currently using Bose IE2 earbuds as well, and moving back and forth from the Bose to these it surprises me how much cleaner the Bose sound. <hl> The build quality is also lacking . <hl> I would qualify the build as better than cheap Skullcandy earbuds, but I expect these to shred apart in less than 6 months after careful use. The shielding around the wires is thin, and the connection point to the buds feel like they will either loosen too much or the shielding will wear away at the bud contact points. The "remote" portion is not as solidly built as can be, but the one control button has a good click to it. Overall a cheap feel. The actual fit is not bad at all. There are multiple tips, so one is bound to fit properly, and they do a decent job of isolating sound from a tight seal in the ear. The actual control of an Android phone (Droid Incredible 2) is spotty. The app to fully utilize these has a decent amount of setup options for only having one button to use. Sometimes the earbuds control spot on, sometimes I accidentally hang up on a phone call by mistake. There seems to be noticeable lag or non-responsiveness with button presses at times, and was verified to work the in the same spotty nature on a Galaxy Nexus as well. I would have loved a separate set of volume up/down buttons, instead of having to long hold the button to go from lowest volume to loudest without any accuracy. On a positive note, basic interface works on iPods/iPhones as well, with the ability to play/pause as well as start up voice control. Call quality is pretty impressive overall. People on the other end sound fine through the headset, although a bit hollow and distant sounding. I have been told after multiple calls that the quality of my voice through the microphone sounds good, even with me leaving the mic portion hang naturally from the cord without me holding it. The only negative about the mic is that is seems prone to pic up ambient noise as well as wind, but in a quieter indoor environment there were no issues. With a limited supply of controllable earbuds for Android, these may fit your need. They do work, but do not expect anything more than a passable experience and barely passable sound quality. The $99.99 asking price is outrageous. I bought these for $65, and I am questioning my purchase.

e88127f5b64112ddb7e41296039a53df

electronics

and especially

question: How about the specs?, context: **REVIEW UPDATED ON 7/30/13 - Updated speakers, "other features", battery life, gripes**For anyone on the fence, and especially for those frustrated by the performance slowdown issues with the original Nexus 7 tablet, don't let that scare you off from buying the second generation model.Google made all of the right improvements to the product, and the result is a significantly improved product for a marginally higher cost. Only time will tell if this unit suffers the same performance fate as the original model (for those not familiar, over time, the first generation tablets tended to quickly slow down and struggle to perform even basic tasks like browsing the internet). However, Android 4.3 feels ultra-smooth so far, and I am hoping that Google and Asus learned from their original mistakes.SCREEN: The new screen is absolutely stunning. Some people argue that the resolution of 323 pixels per inch is unnecessary, but you can really see the difference when you use it in person. Text is significantly sharper and a little easier on the eye to read. Using the tablet to watch videos and see pictures produces a stunning result.PROCESSOR: This is the #1 reason I'd recommend this new, upgraded Nexus 7 over the older version. The speed upgrade is unquestionably immense, and to those who have used the older and newest model Nexus 7, you will notice and appreciate this immediately. Apps load instantly; the internet browsing experience is smooth and a very welcome upgrade over past performance. It's strange; a few days ago I was satisfied with the decent albeit declining performance of my 1st Gen Nexus 7. Now that I have this new one, I use them both side by side and the older model feels like a dinosaur. This alone is reason enough to upgrade.SIZE/WEIGHT: The reduced thickness and weight of the tablet is very noticeable. I often times used my old Nexus 7 tablet while sitting in bed, to check email and browse the web prior to going to sleep. Holding the old Nexus in one hand, and the new one in the other, the differences in size and weight are VERY noticeable. No doubt will provide a more comfortable long term usage experience, especially for extended sessions while on flights or the subway.BATTERY LIFE: After a couple days of using this new Nexus 7, I can confidently say that the battery life has been significantly improved over the original model. My previous session of about 2 hours straight of use (screen on, using apps that draw semi-frequent data over wi-fi) drained only 20% of the battery life. If I project this out, it would tell me that I could get 10 hours of constant use on one full charge. I haven't run through an entire charge yet from 100% down to 0% (I've been recharging after each use), but I'll try to get to that sometime this week and report back on my total real-world battery life.CAMERAS: Google added a rear-facing Camera on this new second gen Nexus. While I typically wouldn't use my tablet as a camera, I have tried it out and it takes excellent pictures. Focuses quickly, the images are sharp and the low light performance, while not great, is better than I would have expected. The front-facing camera gets more use for me (I use my tablets to Skype with family). The new front facing camera is noticeably sharper and better in lower light situations than the original Nexus 7 camera was. In low light, the old model was almost unusable. The 2nd gen Nexus 7 low light performance is very acceptable.SPEAKERS: I've now spent some time using this second-gen Nexus 7 side by side with my original Nexus 7. Separately, they both sound very acceptable for speakers from small tablets. Using them side by side, the improvements to the Nexus 7 are very noticeable, and the sound is more clear even at high volumes. I'd say that this new model sounds far less "tinny" than the original Nexus did. Personally, I don't use the built-in speakers often (I'm normally either listening with headphones, or using bluetooth audio to my Logitech Boombox). But for people who do use the built-in speakers to play music or watch movies, you will appreciate the improvement in the speakers.OTHER FEATURES: Last night, I realized that this tablet is compatible with Qi Wireless Charging, a discovery which made me VERY happy. I use a Nexus 4 cell phone, and I keep it on my nightstand on the Google Nexus Charging Orb. I attempted to use the orb with this new Nexus 7 tablet, and it worked perfectly. You have to sit the tablet landscape, with the orb centered on the tablet, and it synced up and began charging instantly.COMPARISONS: I will update this section shortly with my comparison review between this 2nd Gen Nexus 7, the iPad Mini, and the Kindle Fire HD, as soon as I've had more time to test them all side by side.GRIPES AND COMPLAINTS: Here, I'll list any gripes that I have about the tablet. My first major gripe is that I am not a huge fan of the texture/material used on the back of the tablet. It's a slightly rubberized feeling coating, which I assume they did to create additional grip. However, I've been finding that after holding with one hand for a few minutes, I notice the tablet starting to slide a little bit in my hand. I think this is a combination of the new texture plus the fact that it's thinner than it used to be. I'm probably going to be purchasing a case for it shortly, which should alleviate this problem, but it is still worth noting. This is just a personal preference things (if you normally hold it landscape w/ two hands, you'll probably prefer this new texture over the old one).All in all, I am VERY impressed with how much faster this tablet is than my original Nexus 7 tablet. As long as this model doesn't suffer the performance slowdown issue of the original Nexus 7, I don't anticipate moving this away from a 5 star product anytime soon, but only time will tell I guess. I will keep this review updated as I go, and add thoughts on more features once I test them out further (the speakers, longer term battery life tests, performance slowdown, etc). If you have anything else you want me to address, please let me know in the comments section and I will be glad to address it.

How about the specs?

**REVIEW UPDATED ON 7/30/13 - Updated speakers, "other features", battery life, gripes**For anyone on the fence, and especially for those frustrated by the performance slowdown issues with the original Nexus 7 tablet, don't let that scare you off from buying the second generation model.

**REVIEW UPDATED ON 7/30/13 - Updated speakers, "other features", battery life, gripes**For anyone on the fence, and especially for those frustrated by the performance slowdown issues with the original Nexus 7 tablet, don't let that scare you off from buying the second generation model.Google made all of the right improvements to the product, and the result is a significantly improved product for a marginally higher cost. Only time will tell if this unit suffers the same performance fate as the original model (for those not familiar, over time, the first generation tablets tended to quickly slow down and struggle to perform even basic tasks like browsing the internet). However, Android 4.3 feels ultra-smooth so far, and I am hoping that Google and Asus learned from their original mistakes.SCREEN: The new screen is absolutely stunning. Some people argue that the resolution of 323 pixels per inch is unnecessary, but you can really see the difference when you use it in person. Text is significantly sharper and a little easier on the eye to read. Using the tablet to watch videos and see pictures produces a stunning result.PROCESSOR: This is the #1 reason I'd recommend this new, upgraded Nexus 7 over the older version. The speed upgrade is unquestionably immense, and to those who have used the older and newest model Nexus 7, you will notice and appreciate this immediately. Apps load instantly; the internet browsing experience is smooth and a very welcome upgrade over past performance. It's strange; a few days ago I was satisfied with the decent albeit declining performance of my 1st Gen Nexus 7. Now that I have this new one, I use them both side by side and the older model feels like a dinosaur. This alone is reason enough to upgrade.SIZE/WEIGHT: The reduced thickness and weight of the tablet is very noticeable. I often times used my old Nexus 7 tablet while sitting in bed, to check email and browse the web prior to going to sleep. Holding the old Nexus in one hand, and the new one in the other, the differences in size and weight are VERY noticeable. No doubt will provide a more comfortable long term usage experience, especially for extended sessions while on flights or the subway.BATTERY LIFE: After a couple days of using this new Nexus 7, I can confidently say that the battery life has been significantly improved over the original model. My previous session of about 2 hours straight of use (screen on, using apps that draw semi-frequent data over wi-fi) drained only 20% of the battery life. If I project this out, it would tell me that I could get 10 hours of constant use on one full charge. I haven't run through an entire charge yet from 100% down to 0% (I've been recharging after each use), but I'll try to get to that sometime this week and report back on my total real-world battery life.CAMERAS: Google added a rear-facing Camera on this new second gen Nexus. While I typically wouldn't use my tablet as a camera, I have tried it out and it takes excellent pictures. Focuses quickly, the images are sharp and the low light performance, while not great, is better than I would have expected. The front-facing camera gets more use for me (I use my tablets to Skype with family). The new front facing camera is noticeably sharper and better in lower light situations than the original Nexus 7 camera was. In low light, the old model was almost unusable. The 2nd gen Nexus 7 low light performance is very acceptable.SPEAKERS: I've now spent some time using this second-gen Nexus 7 side by side with my original Nexus 7. Separately, they both sound very acceptable for speakers from small tablets. Using them side by side, the improvements to the Nexus 7 are very noticeable, and the sound is more clear even at high volumes. I'd say that this new model sounds far less "tinny" than the original Nexus did. Personally, I don't use the built-in speakers often (I'm normally either listening with headphones, or using bluetooth audio to my Logitech Boombox). But for people who do use the built-in speakers to play music or watch movies, you will appreciate the improvement in the speakers.OTHER FEATURES: Last night, I realized that this tablet is compatible with Qi Wireless Charging, a discovery which made me VERY happy. I use a Nexus 4 cell phone, and I keep it on my nightstand on the Google Nexus Charging Orb. I attempted to use the orb with this new Nexus 7 tablet, and it worked perfectly. You have to sit the tablet landscape, with the orb centered on the tablet, and it synced up and began charging instantly.COMPARISONS: I will update this section shortly with my comparison review between this 2nd Gen Nexus 7, the iPad Mini, and the Kindle Fire HD, as soon as I've had more time to test them all side by side.GRIPES AND COMPLAINTS: Here, I'll list any gripes that I have about the tablet. My first major gripe is that I am not a huge fan of the texture/material used on the back of the tablet. It's a slightly rubberized feeling coating, which I assume they did to create additional grip. However, I've been finding that after holding with one hand for a few minutes, I notice the tablet starting to slide a little bit in my hand. I think this is a combination of the new texture plus the fact that it's thinner than it used to be. I'm probably going to be purchasing a case for it shortly, which should alleviate this problem, but it is still worth noting. This is just a personal preference things (if you normally hold it landscape w/ two hands, you'll probably prefer this new texture over the old one).All in all, I am VERY impressed with how much faster this tablet is than my original Nexus 7 tablet. As long as this model doesn't suffer the performance slowdown issue of the original Nexus 7, I don't anticipate moving this away from a 5 star product anytime soon, but only time will tell I guess. I will keep this review updated as I go, and add thoughts on more features once I test them out further (the speakers, longer term battery life tests, performance slowdown, etc). If you have anything else you want me to address, please let me know in the comments section and I will be glad to address it.

**REVIEW UPDATED ON 7/30/13 - Updated speakers, "other features", battery life, gripes**For anyone on the fence, <hl> and especially <hl> for those frustrated by the performance slowdown issues with the original Nexus 7 tablet, don't let that scare you off from buying the second generation model.

**REVIEW UPDATED ON 7/30/13 - Updated speakers, "other features", battery life, gripes**For anyone on the fence, <hl> and especially <hl> for those frustrated by the performance slowdown issues with the original Nexus 7 tablet, don't let that scare you off from buying the second generation model.Google made all of the right improvements to the product, and the result is a significantly improved product for a marginally higher cost. Only time will tell if this unit suffers the same performance fate as the original model (for those not familiar, over time, the first generation tablets tended to quickly slow down and struggle to perform even basic tasks like browsing the internet). However, Android 4.3 feels ultra-smooth so far, and I am hoping that Google and Asus learned from their original mistakes.SCREEN: The new screen is absolutely stunning. Some people argue that the resolution of 323 pixels per inch is unnecessary, but you can really see the difference when you use it in person. Text is significantly sharper and a little easier on the eye to read. Using the tablet to watch videos and see pictures produces a stunning result.PROCESSOR: This is the #1 reason I'd recommend this new, upgraded Nexus 7 over the older version. The speed upgrade is unquestionably immense, and to those who have used the older and newest model Nexus 7, you will notice and appreciate this immediately. Apps load instantly; the internet browsing experience is smooth and a very welcome upgrade over past performance. It's strange; a few days ago I was satisfied with the decent albeit declining performance of my 1st Gen Nexus 7. Now that I have this new one, I use them both side by side and the older model feels like a dinosaur. This alone is reason enough to upgrade.SIZE/WEIGHT: The reduced thickness and weight of the tablet is very noticeable. I often times used my old Nexus 7 tablet while sitting in bed, to check email and browse the web prior to going to sleep. Holding the old Nexus in one hand, and the new one in the other, the differences in size and weight are VERY noticeable. No doubt will provide a more comfortable long term usage experience, especially for extended sessions while on flights or the subway.BATTERY LIFE: After a couple days of using this new Nexus 7, I can confidently say that the battery life has been significantly improved over the original model. My previous session of about 2 hours straight of use (screen on, using apps that draw semi-frequent data over wi-fi) drained only 20% of the battery life. If I project this out, it would tell me that I could get 10 hours of constant use on one full charge. I haven't run through an entire charge yet from 100% down to 0% (I've been recharging after each use), but I'll try to get to that sometime this week and report back on my total real-world battery life.CAMERAS: Google added a rear-facing Camera on this new second gen Nexus. While I typically wouldn't use my tablet as a camera, I have tried it out and it takes excellent pictures. Focuses quickly, the images are sharp and the low light performance, while not great, is better than I would have expected. The front-facing camera gets more use for me (I use my tablets to Skype with family). The new front facing camera is noticeably sharper and better in lower light situations than the original Nexus 7 camera was. In low light, the old model was almost unusable. The 2nd gen Nexus 7 low light performance is very acceptable.SPEAKERS: I've now spent some time using this second-gen Nexus 7 side by side with my original Nexus 7. Separately, they both sound very acceptable for speakers from small tablets. Using them side by side, the improvements to the Nexus 7 are very noticeable, and the sound is more clear even at high volumes. I'd say that this new model sounds far less "tinny" than the original Nexus did. Personally, I don't use the built-in speakers often (I'm normally either listening with headphones, or using bluetooth audio to my Logitech Boombox). But for people who do use the built-in speakers to play music or watch movies, you will appreciate the improvement in the speakers.OTHER FEATURES: Last night, I realized that this tablet is compatible with Qi Wireless Charging, a discovery which made me VERY happy. I use a Nexus 4 cell phone, and I keep it on my nightstand on the Google Nexus Charging Orb. I attempted to use the orb with this new Nexus 7 tablet, and it worked perfectly. You have to sit the tablet landscape, with the orb centered on the tablet, and it synced up and began charging instantly.COMPARISONS: I will update this section shortly with my comparison review between this 2nd Gen Nexus 7, the iPad Mini, and the Kindle Fire HD, as soon as I've had more time to test them all side by side.GRIPES AND COMPLAINTS: Here, I'll list any gripes that I have about the tablet. My first major gripe is that I am not a huge fan of the texture/material used on the back of the tablet. It's a slightly rubberized feeling coating, which I assume they did to create additional grip. However, I've been finding that after holding with one hand for a few minutes, I notice the tablet starting to slide a little bit in my hand. I think this is a combination of the new texture plus the fact that it's thinner than it used to be. I'm probably going to be purchasing a case for it shortly, which should alleviate this problem, but it is still worth noting. This is just a personal preference things (if you normally hold it landscape w/ two hands, you'll probably prefer this new texture over the old one).All in all, I am VERY impressed with how much faster this tablet is than my original Nexus 7 tablet. As long as this model doesn't suffer the performance slowdown issue of the original Nexus 7, I don't anticipate moving this away from a 5 star product anytime soon, but only time will tell I guess. I will keep this review updated as I go, and add thoughts on more features once I test them out further (the speakers, longer term battery life tests, performance slowdown, etc). If you have anything else you want me to address, please let me know in the comments section and I will be glad to address it.

<hl> **REVIEW UPDATED ON 7/30/13 - Updated speakers, "other features", battery life, gripes**For anyone on the fence, and especially for those frustrated by the performance slowdown issues with the original Nexus 7 tablet, don't let that scare you off from buying the second generation model. <hl> Google made all of the right improvements to the product, and the result is a significantly improved product for a marginally higher cost. Only time will tell if this unit suffers the same performance fate as the original model (for those not familiar, over time, the first generation tablets tended to quickly slow down and struggle to perform even basic tasks like browsing the internet). However, Android 4.3 feels ultra-smooth so far, and I am hoping that Google and Asus learned from their original mistakes. SCREEN: The new screen is absolutely stunning. Some people argue that the resolution of 323 pixels per inch is unnecessary, but you can really see the difference when you use it in person. Text is significantly sharper and a little easier on the eye to read. Using the tablet to watch videos and see pictures produces a stunning result. PROCESSOR: This is the #1 reason I'd recommend this new, upgraded Nexus 7 over the older version. The speed upgrade is unquestionably immense, and to those who have used the older and newest model Nexus 7, you will notice and appreciate this immediately. Apps load instantly; the internet browsing experience is smooth and a very welcome upgrade over past performance. It's strange; a few days ago I was satisfied with the decent albeit declining performance of my 1st Gen Nexus 7. Now that I have this new one, I use them both side by side and the older model feels like a dinosaur. This alone is reason enough to upgrade. SIZE/WEIGHT: The reduced thickness and weight of the tablet is very noticeable. I often times used my old Nexus 7 tablet while sitting in bed, to check email and browse the web prior to going to sleep. Holding the old Nexus in one hand, and the new one in the other, the differences in size and weight are VERY noticeable. No doubt will provide a more comfortable long term usage experience, especially for extended sessions while on flights or the subway. BATTERY LIFE: After a couple days of using this new Nexus 7, I can confidently say that the battery life has been significantly improved over the original model. My previous session of about 2 hours straight of use (screen on, using apps that draw semi-frequent data over wi-fi) drained only 20% of the battery life. If I project this out, it would tell me that I could get 10 hours of constant use on one full charge. I haven't run through an entire charge yet from 100% down to 0% (I've been recharging after each use), but I'll try to get to that sometime this week and report back on my total real-world battery life. CAMERAS: Google added a rear-facing Camera on this new second gen Nexus. While I typically wouldn't use my tablet as a camera, I have tried it out and it takes excellent pictures. Focuses quickly, the images are sharp and the low light performance, while not great, is better than I would have expected. The front-facing camera gets more use for me (I use my tablets to Skype with family). The new front facing camera is noticeably sharper and better in lower light situations than the original Nexus 7 camera was. In low light, the old model was almost unusable. The 2nd gen Nexus 7 low light performance is very acceptable. SPEAKERS: I've now spent some time using this second-gen Nexus 7 side by side with my original Nexus 7. Separately, they both sound very acceptable for speakers from small tablets. Using them side by side, the improvements to the Nexus 7 are very noticeable, and the sound is more clear even at high volumes. I'd say that this new model sounds far less "tinny" than the original Nexus did. Personally, I don't use the built-in speakers often (I'm normally either listening with headphones, or using bluetooth audio to my Logitech Boombox). But for people who do use the built-in speakers to play music or watch movies, you will appreciate the improvement in the speakers. OTHER FEATURES: Last night, I realized that this tablet is compatible with Qi Wireless Charging, a discovery which made me VERY happy. I use a Nexus 4 cell phone, and I keep it on my nightstand on the Google Nexus Charging Orb. I attempted to use the orb with this new Nexus 7 tablet, and it worked perfectly. You have to sit the tablet landscape, with the orb centered on the tablet, and it synced up and began charging instantly. COMPARISONS: I will update this section shortly with my comparison review between this 2nd Gen Nexus 7, the iPad Mini, and the Kindle Fire HD, as soon as I've had more time to test them all side by side. GRIPES AND COMPLAINTS: Here, I'll list any gripes that I have about the tablet. My first major gripe is that I am not a huge fan of the texture/material used on the back of the tablet. It's a slightly rubberized feeling coating, which I assume they did to create additional grip. However, I've been finding that after holding with one hand for a few minutes, I notice the tablet starting to slide a little bit in my hand. I think this is a combination of the new texture plus the fact that it's thinner than it used to be. I'm probably going to be purchasing a case for it shortly, which should alleviate this problem, but it is still worth noting. This is just a personal preference things (if you normally hold it landscape w/ two hands, you'll probably prefer this new texture over the old one).All in all, I am VERY impressed with how much faster this tablet is than my original Nexus 7 tablet. As long as this model doesn't suffer the performance slowdown issue of the original Nexus 7, I don't anticipate moving this away from a 5 star product anytime soon, but only time will tell I guess. I will keep this review updated as I go, and add thoughts on more features once I test them out further (the speakers, longer term battery life tests, performance slowdown, etc). If you have anything else you want me to address, please let me know in the comments section and I will be glad to address it.

cd993018cc323094090f9ec041082784

electronics

price of this cable is just amazing

question: What shipping is more great on amazon?, context: I am using this cable to view my video footage capptured with a hi definition camcorder (Sony HDR-SR1) on a hi definition LCD TV (Samsung). The picture is just mind blowing. Moreover the price of this cable is just amazing! You can never get deal better than this I guess!

What shipping is more great on amazon?

Moreover the price of this cable is just amazing !

I am using this cable to view my video footage capptured with a hi definition camcorder (Sony HDR-SR1) on a hi definition LCD TV (Samsung). The picture is just mind blowing. Moreover the price of this cable is just amazing! You can never get deal better than this I guess!

Moreover the <hl> price of this cable is just amazing <hl> !

I am using this cable to view my video footage capptured with a hi definition camcorder (Sony HDR-SR1) on a hi definition LCD TV (Samsung). The picture is just mind blowing. Moreover the <hl> price of this cable is just amazing <hl>! You can never get deal better than this I guess!

I am using this cable to view my video footage capptured with a hi definition camcorder (Sony HDR-SR1) on a hi definition LCD TV (Samsung). The picture is just mind blowing. <hl> Moreover the price of this cable is just amazing ! <hl> You can never get deal better than this I guess!

ee59ac17ab128acfacbbc6a0d5b58dcf

electronics

The user interface is so easy a child could use it

question: How is the quality of the interface?, context: I previously bought a Google TV set before buying this. If I had known about this I would have definitely gotten this first. I absolutely love it. The user interface is so easy a child could use it!

How is the quality of the interface?

The user interface is so easy a child could use it !

I previously bought a Google TV set before buying this. If I had known about this I would have definitely gotten this first. I absolutely love it. The user interface is so easy a child could use it!

<hl> The user interface is so easy a child could use it <hl> !

I previously bought a Google TV set before buying this. If I had known about this I would have definitely gotten this first. I absolutely love it. <hl> The user interface is so easy a child could use it <hl>!

I previously bought a Google TV set before buying this. If I had known about this I would have definitely gotten this first. I absolutely love it. <hl> The user interface is so easy a child could use it ! <hl>

e252ca313458d3b787a832a18af007d5

electronics

The cushion on these things is MASSIVE and soft

question: Why are the pads extremely comfortable?, context: The cushion on these things is MASSIVE and soft. They compress a lot so it doesn't look goofy and it feels amazing. The sound quality is great but the cord is pretty short to me compared to some headphones but then again I like longer cords for PC use so it might just be me. At this price, you can't say no.

Why are the pads extremely comfortable?

The cushion on these things is MASSIVE and soft .

The cushion on these things is MASSIVE and soft. They compress a lot so it doesn't look goofy and it feels amazing. The sound quality is great but the cord is pretty short to me compared to some headphones but then again I like longer cords for PC use so it might just be me. At this price, you can't say no.

<hl> The cushion on these things is MASSIVE and soft <hl> .

<hl> The cushion on these things is MASSIVE and soft <hl>. They compress a lot so it doesn't look goofy and it feels amazing. The sound quality is great but the cord is pretty short to me compared to some headphones but then again I like longer cords for PC use so it might just be me. At this price, you can't say no.

<hl> The cushion on these things is MASSIVE and soft . <hl> They compress a lot so it doesn't look goofy and it feels amazing. The sound quality is great but the cord is pretty short to me compared to some headphones but then again I like longer cords for PC use so it might just be me. At this price, you can't say no.

617424133ddb4d262d10ba0face96b0f

electronics

this drive is faster

question: How is the drive?, context: Hands down best bang for your buck SSD i have a 3 year old Toshiba that is fairly fast.. but when i put this ssd in it ws like buying a brand new laptop! i have a intel 520 cherryville in my Desktop PC and this drive is faster! buy it you wont be sorry

How is the drive?

i have a intel 520 cherryville in my Desktop PC and this drive is faster !

Hands down best bang for your buck SSD i have a 3 year old Toshiba that is fairly fast.. but when i put this ssd in it ws like buying a brand new laptop! i have a intel 520 cherryville in my Desktop PC and this drive is faster! buy it you wont be sorry

i have a intel 520 cherryville in my Desktop PC and <hl> this drive is faster <hl> !

Hands down best bang for your buck SSD i have a 3 year old Toshiba that is fairly fast.. but when i put this ssd in it ws like buying a brand new laptop! i have a intel 520 cherryville in my Desktop PC and <hl> this drive is faster <hl>! buy it you wont be sorry

Hands down best bang for your buck SSD i have a 3 year old Toshiba that is fairly fast.. but when i put this ssd in it ws like buying a brand new laptop! <hl> i have a intel 520 cherryville in my Desktop PC and this drive is faster ! <hl> buy it you wont be sorry

3500556d476b6768ed2786ebdcd2f391

electronics

the house ... just forget about it.USELESS camera, be away

question: Is a helpless camera?, context: Image quality is bad, view angle is narrow,Access from outside the home is impossible no matter what you.I tried everything, Dynamic DNS, opening ports and forwarding protocols, .. everything.I can see it in the same LAN but once you get out of the house ... just forget about it.USELESS camera, be away.

Is a helpless camera?

I can see it in the same LAN but once you get out of the house ... just forget about it.USELESS camera, be away .

Image quality is bad, view angle is narrow,Access from outside the home is impossible no matter what you.I tried everything, Dynamic DNS, opening ports and forwarding protocols, .. everything.I can see it in the same LAN but once you get out of the house ... just forget about it.USELESS camera, be away.

I can see it in the same LAN but once you get out of <hl> the house ... just forget about it.USELESS camera, be away <hl> .

Image quality is bad, view angle is narrow,Access from outside the home is impossible no matter what you.I tried everything, Dynamic DNS, opening ports and forwarding protocols, .. everything.I can see it in the same LAN but once you get out of <hl> the house ... just forget about it.USELESS camera, be away <hl>.

Image quality is bad, view angle is narrow,Access from outside the home is impossible no matter what you. I tried everything, Dynamic DNS, opening ports and forwarding protocols, .. everything. <hl> I can see it in the same LAN but once you get out of the house ... just forget about it.USELESS camera, be away . <hl>

183a2dc8f4fbcc34f1d841a08abbc3de

electronics

i think its only fair dat Roku

question: How is the box?, context: I saw all d reviews an thought amazin smart device since i have a fast internet connection...wen i got it..perfect packagin..ez instructions....set up..worked...btw..u have to give ur credit cared info...the problem am gettin i know dere channels u will pay for...but...i am not gettin d Basic channels on the Channel Store...no Crackle..no Hulu..No Disney....etc...yet...the ....Channel store shows me these Channels at the bottom to add..an wen i "click on dem"...it returns to Channel Store..without the channels bein added...now if its a location ting...i think its only fair dat Roku..let it known or Amazon..that alot of the advertised Channels...are bogus..out of the USA...dont get me wrong dere alot of "channels"...but the most popular i saw advertised am not getting as a option to add..an funny enuff..there 3 buttons on the remote..for Crackle..Netflix...Pandora..none work..jus goes bac to the main menu

How is the box?

i think its only fair dat Roku ..let it known or Amazon..that alot of the advertised Channels...are bogus..out of the USA...dont get me wrong dere alot of "channels"...but the most popular i saw advertised am not getting as a option to add..an funny enuff..there 3 buttons on the remote..for Crackle..Netflix...Pandora..none work..jus goes bac to the main menu

I saw all d reviews an thought amazin smart device since i have a fast internet connection...wen i got it..perfect packagin..ez instructions....set up..worked...btw..u have to give ur credit cared info...the problem am gettin i know dere channels u will pay for...but...i am not gettin d Basic channels on the Channel Store...no Crackle..no Hulu..No Disney....etc...yet...the ....Channel store shows me these Channels at the bottom to add..an wen i "click on dem"...it returns to Channel Store..without the channels bein added...now if its a location ting...i think its only fair dat Roku..let it known or Amazon..that alot of the advertised Channels...are bogus..out of the USA...dont get me wrong dere alot of "channels"...but the most popular i saw advertised am not getting as a option to add..an funny enuff..there 3 buttons on the remote..for Crackle..Netflix...Pandora..none work..jus goes bac to the main menu

<hl> i think its only fair dat Roku <hl> ..let it known or Amazon..that alot of the advertised Channels...are bogus..out of the USA...dont get me wrong dere alot of "channels"...but the most popular i saw advertised am not getting as a option to add..an funny enuff..there 3 buttons on the remote..for Crackle..Netflix...Pandora..none work..jus goes bac to the main menu

I saw all d reviews an thought amazin smart device since i have a fast internet connection...wen i got it..perfect packagin..ez instructions....set up..worked...btw..u have to give ur credit cared info...the problem am gettin i know dere channels u will pay for...but...i am not gettin d Basic channels on the Channel Store...no Crackle..no Hulu..No Disney....etc...yet...the ....Channel store shows me these Channels at the bottom to add..an wen i "click on dem"...it returns to Channel Store..without the channels bein added...now if its a location ting...<hl> i think its only fair dat Roku <hl>..let it known or Amazon..that alot of the advertised Channels...are bogus..out of the USA...dont get me wrong dere alot of "channels"...but the most popular i saw advertised am not getting as a option to add..an funny enuff..there 3 buttons on the remote..for Crackle..Netflix...Pandora..none work..jus goes bac to the main menu

I saw all d reviews an thought amazin smart device since i have a fast internet connection...wen i got it..perfect packagin.. ez instructions....set up..worked...btw..u have to give ur credit cared info...the problem am gettin i know dere channels u will pay for...but... i am not gettin d Basic channels on the Channel Store...no Crackle..no Hulu..No Disney....etc...yet...the ....Channel store shows me these Channels at the bottom to add..an wen i "click on dem"...it returns to Channel Store..without the channels bein added...now if its a location ting... <hl> i think its only fair dat Roku ..let it known or Amazon..that alot of the advertised Channels...are bogus..out of the USA...dont get me wrong dere alot of "channels"...but the most popular i saw advertised am not getting as a option to add..an funny enuff..there 3 buttons on the remote..for Crackle..Netflix...Pandora..none work..jus goes bac to the main menu <hl>

2a8ae55e5f71585e8b40ff446d31d66e

electronics

It perfectly detects the speed each device is capable to achieve and the LED's illuminated accordingly

question: What happens to the ports if you plug it in?, context: I bought this little switch to expand my home LAN. There is no really setup, just plugged it to one of my router's ports, hooked up the power supply and it was ready to go. It's eight ports are great, you can use any one as the up-link without any special configuration. I am using six out of its eight ports, one for up-link and the others for attached devices. It perfectly detects the speed each device is capable to achieve and the LED's illuminated accordingly. It is very well build, has a solid and durable feeling. No complains, at all.

What happens to the ports if you plug it in?

It perfectly detects the speed each device is capable to achieve and the LED's illuminated accordingly .

I bought this little switch to expand my home LAN. There is no really setup, just plugged it to one of my router's ports, hooked up the power supply and it was ready to go. It's eight ports are great, you can use any one as the up-link without any special configuration. I am using six out of its eight ports, one for up-link and the others for attached devices. It perfectly detects the speed each device is capable to achieve and the LED's illuminated accordingly. It is very well build, has a solid and durable feeling. No complains, at all.

<hl> It perfectly detects the speed each device is capable to achieve and the LED's illuminated accordingly <hl> .

I bought this little switch to expand my home LAN. There is no really setup, just plugged it to one of my router's ports, hooked up the power supply and it was ready to go. It's eight ports are great, you can use any one as the up-link without any special configuration. I am using six out of its eight ports, one for up-link and the others for attached devices. <hl> It perfectly detects the speed each device is capable to achieve and the LED's illuminated accordingly <hl>. It is very well build, has a solid and durable feeling. No complains, at all.

I bought this little switch to expand my home LAN. There is no really setup, just plugged it to one of my router's ports, hooked up the power supply and it was ready to go. It's eight ports are great, you can use any one as the up-link without any special configuration. I am using six out of its eight ports, one for up-link and the others for attached devices. <hl> It perfectly detects the speed each device is capable to achieve and the LED's illuminated accordingly . <hl> It is very well build, has a solid and durable feeling. No complains, at all.

25d45ae08585bb796bdbee466a2cd947

electronics

Although the sound is nice and neutral

question: How clear was the sound?, context: Although the sound is nice and neutral, the bass is practically non-existent. The fit, with the right rubber socks, is fine. It stays in your ears while moving. I suppose you gets what you pays for.

How clear was the sound?

Although the sound is nice and neutral , the bass is practically non-existent.

Although the sound is nice and neutral, the bass is practically non-existent. The fit, with the right rubber socks, is fine. It stays in your ears while moving. I suppose you gets what you pays for.

<hl> Although the sound is nice and neutral <hl> , the bass is practically non-existent.

<hl> Although the sound is nice and neutral <hl>, the bass is practically non-existent. The fit, with the right rubber socks, is fine. It stays in your ears while moving. I suppose you gets what you pays for.

<hl> Although the sound is nice and neutral , the bass is practically non-existent. <hl> The fit, with the right rubber socks, is fine. It stays in your ears while moving. I suppose you gets what you pays for.

b75d1b4b72aa10f05dd187106266ae7b

electronics

quite good.

question: How big is the camera?, context: Bridge cameras are a quirky lot: they're essentially a point-and-shoot camera with DSLR-like features. For the HS50EXR, the phrase &#34;DSLR-like&#34; sums it up almost entirely.There are many reviews on Amazon and elsewhere that touch on the HS50's main features, so I won't go into those beyond saying that the manual zoom is great and the image quality (which has been spoken poorly about in some cases) is actually quite good. This review is intended to hit on features that might not get immediate consideration when you're looking for a bridge camera.I purchased the HS50EXR as a backup to my DSLR, something that would be easy to carry and that my wife (who is not a photographer) could use and get good results. Also, I needed something with strong video capabilities that would auto-focus well. This camera delivers in spades. It's fantastic, full-featured, and easy for my wife to use but with enough control to give experienced photographers plenty to play with.A few points that don't get much press about this camera:Focus Ring: This camera features manual focus via a free-spinning focus ring behind the zoom ring. The focus control is strictly electronic, but the focus ring has a quick, responsive, and organic feel to it. Obviously, for video work you'd want to be able to exert a bit more control over focus, but overall it's impressive. In photo mode, there are focus highlights that appear on whatever the lens is focused on, a useful feature that the Magic Lantern crowd will recognize and appreciate. Sadly, that same crowd will be sorely disappointed to find out this feature is not present in video mode. Video mode will allow manual focus, of course, but without the handy focus peak highlights.Bayonet/58mm Lens: This camera includes a bayonet-style tulip lens hood (which was impressive to me), and also accepts 58mm lens accessories. That was my big gripe about other bridge cameras; there was no way to provide the glass with any protection. The HS50EXR lets you put a UV filter on the front, which is especially crucial considering you don't have the luxury of replacing a lens if it gets dinged up.Video Quality: One of the best things about this camera is its video quality. It is sharp, responsive, quick to focus, maintains focus easily, and there are a number of high-fps options for slow-motion video. Of course, the faster the shutter goes, the lower your resolution gets, but if you're looking to capture something cool at a high frame rate, this will definitely do it. One disappointment for video mode is that you are not allocated any control over exposure, so no aperture, shutter speed, etc that you would get on a DSLR.Articulated Screen: This is great for videographers like myself who need to frame a shot while being in front of the lens. Very handy.Q Button: This is a great feature for the camera to have. In true DSLR fashion, you have a dedicated screen to adjust ISO, white balance, shutter speed, aperture, etc. Fantastic, easy to use, and handy.Now, there are a few things that I would have changed on this camera that keep it from getting a full 5 stars:Plastic Tripod Socket: This camera is big and heavy, like a small DSLR. The tripod socket is a heavy-duty hard plastic, but I would have much rather had something metal.Lack of Control in Video Mode: I like that you can use manual focus in video mode, but other than that you get what the camera gives you, which is not exactly what I want. Still, the video mode is great on its own.Sensor Size: This is the biggest difference between the HS50EXR and a true DSLR. Even an entry level DSLR will dwarf the 1/2&#34; sensor that this camera sports. The HS50EXR's sensor is the most tangible throwback to its point-and-shoot roots, but don't write it off immediately. While you'll never fool anyone into thinking your shots came from a DSLR, you'll be sure to get some excellent looking shots. Even some camcorders at this price level have smaller sensors than this, so it's not as bad as people say it is. In fact, I think considering its size, the images look amazing, but I would have liked to see Fuji use a bigger sensor to live up to the DSLR features and aesthetics.If you're looking for a good family camera that's a jack-of-all-trades that yields great results, this is what you're after. If you're on the fence about this camera and a full-fledged DSLR, go with the DSLR. I was glad I purchased a DSLR before purchasing this camera because it gave me a much better sense about what the HS50EXR can and can't do. Once you understand its limitations and capabilities, you can really start making great images with this camera. I definitely recommend it.

How big is the camera?

There are many reviews on Amazon and elsewhere that touch on the HS50's main features, so I won't go into those beyond saying that the manual zoom is great and the image quality (which has been spoken poorly about in some cases) is actually quite good. This review is intended to hit on features that might not get immediate consideration when you're looking for a bridge camera.

Bridge cameras are a quirky lot: they're essentially a point-and-shoot camera with DSLR-like features. For the HS50EXR, the phrase &#34;DSLR-like&#34; sums it up almost entirely.There are many reviews on Amazon and elsewhere that touch on the HS50's main features, so I won't go into those beyond saying that the manual zoom is great and the image quality (which has been spoken poorly about in some cases) is actually quite good. This review is intended to hit on features that might not get immediate consideration when you're looking for a bridge camera.I purchased the HS50EXR as a backup to my DSLR, something that would be easy to carry and that my wife (who is not a photographer) could use and get good results. Also, I needed something with strong video capabilities that would auto-focus well. This camera delivers in spades. It's fantastic, full-featured, and easy for my wife to use but with enough control to give experienced photographers plenty to play with.A few points that don't get much press about this camera:Focus Ring: This camera features manual focus via a free-spinning focus ring behind the zoom ring. The focus control is strictly electronic, but the focus ring has a quick, responsive, and organic feel to it. Obviously, for video work you'd want to be able to exert a bit more control over focus, but overall it's impressive. In photo mode, there are focus highlights that appear on whatever the lens is focused on, a useful feature that the Magic Lantern crowd will recognize and appreciate. Sadly, that same crowd will be sorely disappointed to find out this feature is not present in video mode. Video mode will allow manual focus, of course, but without the handy focus peak highlights.Bayonet/58mm Lens: This camera includes a bayonet-style tulip lens hood (which was impressive to me), and also accepts 58mm lens accessories. That was my big gripe about other bridge cameras; there was no way to provide the glass with any protection. The HS50EXR lets you put a UV filter on the front, which is especially crucial considering you don't have the luxury of replacing a lens if it gets dinged up.Video Quality: One of the best things about this camera is its video quality. It is sharp, responsive, quick to focus, maintains focus easily, and there are a number of high-fps options for slow-motion video. Of course, the faster the shutter goes, the lower your resolution gets, but if you're looking to capture something cool at a high frame rate, this will definitely do it. One disappointment for video mode is that you are not allocated any control over exposure, so no aperture, shutter speed, etc that you would get on a DSLR.Articulated Screen: This is great for videographers like myself who need to frame a shot while being in front of the lens. Very handy.Q Button: This is a great feature for the camera to have. In true DSLR fashion, you have a dedicated screen to adjust ISO, white balance, shutter speed, aperture, etc. Fantastic, easy to use, and handy.Now, there are a few things that I would have changed on this camera that keep it from getting a full 5 stars:Plastic Tripod Socket: This camera is big and heavy, like a small DSLR. The tripod socket is a heavy-duty hard plastic, but I would have much rather had something metal.Lack of Control in Video Mode: I like that you can use manual focus in video mode, but other than that you get what the camera gives you, which is not exactly what I want. Still, the video mode is great on its own.Sensor Size: This is the biggest difference between the HS50EXR and a true DSLR. Even an entry level DSLR will dwarf the 1/2&#34; sensor that this camera sports. The HS50EXR's sensor is the most tangible throwback to its point-and-shoot roots, but don't write it off immediately. While you'll never fool anyone into thinking your shots came from a DSLR, you'll be sure to get some excellent looking shots. Even some camcorders at this price level have smaller sensors than this, so it's not as bad as people say it is. In fact, I think considering its size, the images look amazing, but I would have liked to see Fuji use a bigger sensor to live up to the DSLR features and aesthetics.If you're looking for a good family camera that's a jack-of-all-trades that yields great results, this is what you're after. If you're on the fence about this camera and a full-fledged DSLR, go with the DSLR. I was glad I purchased a DSLR before purchasing this camera because it gave me a much better sense about what the HS50EXR can and can't do. Once you understand its limitations and capabilities, you can really start making great images with this camera. I definitely recommend it.

There are many reviews on Amazon and elsewhere that touch on the HS50's main features, so I won't go into those beyond saying that the manual zoom is great and the image quality (which has been spoken poorly about in some cases) is actually <hl> quite good. <hl> This review is intended to hit on features that might not get immediate consideration when you're looking for a bridge camera.

Bridge cameras are a quirky lot: they're essentially a point-and-shoot camera with DSLR-like features. For the HS50EXR, the phrase &#34;DSLR-like&#34; sums it up almost entirely.There are many reviews on Amazon and elsewhere that touch on the HS50's main features, so I won't go into those beyond saying that the manual zoom is great and the image quality (which has been spoken poorly about in some cases) is actually <hl> quite good. <hl> This review is intended to hit on features that might not get immediate consideration when you're looking for a bridge camera.I purchased the HS50EXR as a backup to my DSLR, something that would be easy to carry and that my wife (who is not a photographer) could use and get good results. Also, I needed something with strong video capabilities that would auto-focus well. This camera delivers in spades. It's fantastic, full-featured, and easy for my wife to use but with enough control to give experienced photographers plenty to play with.A few points that don't get much press about this camera:Focus Ring: This camera features manual focus via a free-spinning focus ring behind the zoom ring. The focus control is strictly electronic, but the focus ring has a quick, responsive, and organic feel to it. Obviously, for video work you'd want to be able to exert a bit more control over focus, but overall it's impressive. In photo mode, there are focus highlights that appear on whatever the lens is focused on, a useful feature that the Magic Lantern crowd will recognize and appreciate. Sadly, that same crowd will be sorely disappointed to find out this feature is not present in video mode. Video mode will allow manual focus, of course, but without the handy focus peak highlights.Bayonet/58mm Lens: This camera includes a bayonet-style tulip lens hood (which was impressive to me), and also accepts 58mm lens accessories. That was my big gripe about other bridge cameras; there was no way to provide the glass with any protection. The HS50EXR lets you put a UV filter on the front, which is especially crucial considering you don't have the luxury of replacing a lens if it gets dinged up.Video Quality: One of the best things about this camera is its video quality. It is sharp, responsive, quick to focus, maintains focus easily, and there are a number of high-fps options for slow-motion video. Of course, the faster the shutter goes, the lower your resolution gets, but if you're looking to capture something cool at a high frame rate, this will definitely do it. One disappointment for video mode is that you are not allocated any control over exposure, so no aperture, shutter speed, etc that you would get on a DSLR.Articulated Screen: This is great for videographers like myself who need to frame a shot while being in front of the lens. Very handy.Q Button: This is a great feature for the camera to have. In true DSLR fashion, you have a dedicated screen to adjust ISO, white balance, shutter speed, aperture, etc. Fantastic, easy to use, and handy.Now, there are a few things that I would have changed on this camera that keep it from getting a full 5 stars:Plastic Tripod Socket: This camera is big and heavy, like a small DSLR. The tripod socket is a heavy-duty hard plastic, but I would have much rather had something metal.Lack of Control in Video Mode: I like that you can use manual focus in video mode, but other than that you get what the camera gives you, which is not exactly what I want. Still, the video mode is great on its own.Sensor Size: This is the biggest difference between the HS50EXR and a true DSLR. Even an entry level DSLR will dwarf the 1/2&#34; sensor that this camera sports. The HS50EXR's sensor is the most tangible throwback to its point-and-shoot roots, but don't write it off immediately. While you'll never fool anyone into thinking your shots came from a DSLR, you'll be sure to get some excellent looking shots. Even some camcorders at this price level have smaller sensors than this, so it's not as bad as people say it is. In fact, I think considering its size, the images look amazing, but I would have liked to see Fuji use a bigger sensor to live up to the DSLR features and aesthetics.If you're looking for a good family camera that's a jack-of-all-trades that yields great results, this is what you're after. If you're on the fence about this camera and a full-fledged DSLR, go with the DSLR. I was glad I purchased a DSLR before purchasing this camera because it gave me a much better sense about what the HS50EXR can and can't do. Once you understand its limitations and capabilities, you can really start making great images with this camera. I definitely recommend it.

Bridge cameras are a quirky lot: they're essentially a point-and-shoot camera with DSLR-like features. For the HS50EXR, the phrase &#34;DSLR-like&#34; sums it up almost entirely. <hl> There are many reviews on Amazon and elsewhere that touch on the HS50's main features, so I won't go into those beyond saying that the manual zoom is great and the image quality (which has been spoken poorly about in some cases) is actually quite good. This review is intended to hit on features that might not get immediate consideration when you're looking for a bridge camera. <hl> I purchased the HS50EXR as a backup to my DSLR, something that would be easy to carry and that my wife (who is not a photographer) could use and get good results. Also, I needed something with strong video capabilities that would auto-focus well. This camera delivers in spades. It's fantastic, full-featured, and easy for my wife to use but with enough control to give experienced photographers plenty to play with. A few points that don't get much press about this camera:Focus Ring: This camera features manual focus via a free-spinning focus ring behind the zoom ring. The focus control is strictly electronic, but the focus ring has a quick, responsive, and organic feel to it. Obviously, for video work you'd want to be able to exert a bit more control over focus, but overall it's impressive. In photo mode, there are focus highlights that appear on whatever the lens is focused on, a useful feature that the Magic Lantern crowd will recognize and appreciate. Sadly, that same crowd will be sorely disappointed to find out this feature is not present in video mode. Video mode will allow manual focus, of course, but without the handy focus peak highlights. Bayonet/58mm Lens: This camera includes a bayonet-style tulip lens hood (which was impressive to me), and also accepts 58mm lens accessories. That was my big gripe about other bridge cameras; there was no way to provide the glass with any protection. The HS50EXR lets you put a UV filter on the front, which is especially crucial considering you don't have the luxury of replacing a lens if it gets dinged up. Video Quality: One of the best things about this camera is its video quality. It is sharp, responsive, quick to focus, maintains focus easily, and there are a number of high-fps options for slow-motion video. Of course, the faster the shutter goes, the lower your resolution gets, but if you're looking to capture something cool at a high frame rate, this will definitely do it. One disappointment for video mode is that you are not allocated any control over exposure, so no aperture, shutter speed, etc that you would get on a DSLR.Articulated Screen: This is great for videographers like myself who need to frame a shot while being in front of the lens. Very handy. Q Button: This is a great feature for the camera to have. In true DSLR fashion, you have a dedicated screen to adjust ISO, white balance, shutter speed, aperture, etc. Fantastic, easy to use, and handy. Now, there are a few things that I would have changed on this camera that keep it from getting a full 5 stars:Plastic Tripod Socket: This camera is big and heavy, like a small DSLR. The tripod socket is a heavy-duty hard plastic, but I would have much rather had something metal. Lack of Control in Video Mode: I like that you can use manual focus in video mode, but other than that you get what the camera gives you, which is not exactly what I want. Still, the video mode is great on its own. Sensor Size: This is the biggest difference between the HS50EXR and a true DSLR. Even an entry level DSLR will dwarf the 1/2&#34; sensor that this camera sports. The HS50EXR's sensor is the most tangible throwback to its point-and-shoot roots, but don't write it off immediately. While you'll never fool anyone into thinking your shots came from a DSLR, you'll be sure to get some excellent looking shots. Even some camcorders at this price level have smaller sensors than this, so it's not as bad as people say it is. In fact, I think considering its size, the images look amazing, but I would have liked to see Fuji use a bigger sensor to live up to the DSLR features and aesthetics. If you're looking for a good family camera that's a jack-of-all-trades that yields great results, this is what you're after. If you're on the fence about this camera and a full-fledged DSLR, go with the DSLR. I was glad I purchased a DSLR before purchasing this camera because it gave me a much better sense about what the HS50EXR can and can't do. Once you understand its limitations and capabilities, you can really start making great images with this camera. I definitely recommend it.

f9fdf964f344bf4483ad1be30d3b41dd

electronics

the video was not HD at all

question: How is the image quality like?, context: If you don't have a smart TV with Amazon videos, netflix, hulu, etc., this is definitely the best possible device you could buy. Super cheap and has a pretty decent wifi capabilities to stream HD content from the existing apps.BUT, if you want this primarily to mirror your browser or entire desktop (yes, you can do that with this device except the audio), this product is in serious beta stage. I tried to cast Hulu (not plus) and the audio was fine but the video was not HD at all. Same with Netflix. I was excited about their Beta feature of casting the entire desktop but realized that in that case the video is pretty decent, but it does not cast the audio to the TV speakers.If Google keeps updating the apps and the hardware, I will definitely give their version 2.0 another chance.

How is the image quality like?

but the video was not HD at all .

If you don't have a smart TV with Amazon videos, netflix, hulu, etc., this is definitely the best possible device you could buy. Super cheap and has a pretty decent wifi capabilities to stream HD content from the existing apps.BUT, if you want this primarily to mirror your browser or entire desktop (yes, you can do that with this device except the audio), this product is in serious beta stage. I tried to cast Hulu (not plus) and the audio was fine but the video was not HD at all. Same with Netflix. I was excited about their Beta feature of casting the entire desktop but realized that in that case the video is pretty decent, but it does not cast the audio to the TV speakers.If Google keeps updating the apps and the hardware, I will definitely give their version 2.0 another chance.

but <hl> the video was not HD at all <hl> .

If you don't have a smart TV with Amazon videos, netflix, hulu, etc., this is definitely the best possible device you could buy. Super cheap and has a pretty decent wifi capabilities to stream HD content from the existing apps.BUT, if you want this primarily to mirror your browser or entire desktop (yes, you can do that with this device except the audio), this product is in serious beta stage. I tried to cast Hulu (not plus) and the audio was fine but <hl> the video was not HD at all <hl>. Same with Netflix. I was excited about their Beta feature of casting the entire desktop but realized that in that case the video is pretty decent, but it does not cast the audio to the TV speakers.If Google keeps updating the apps and the hardware, I will definitely give their version 2.0 another chance.

If you don't have a smart TV with Amazon videos, netflix, hulu, etc., this is definitely the best possible device you could buy. Super cheap and has a pretty decent wifi capabilities to stream HD content from the existing apps. BUT, if you want this primarily to mirror your browser or entire desktop (yes, you can do that with this device except the audio), this product is in serious beta stage. I tried to cast Hulu (not plus) and the audio was fine <hl> but the video was not HD at all . <hl> Same with Netflix. I was excited about their Beta feature of casting the entire desktop but realized that in that case the video is pretty decent, but it does not cast the audio to the TV speakers. If Google keeps updating the apps and the hardware, I will definitely give their version 2.0 another chance.

207fba8981d2d11a7fe7a3ed1418b80a

electronics

This is a really good product

question: What do you think about output?, context: This is a really good product. I bought this one as it has both optical and rf audio out in addition to HDMI.

What do you think about output?

This is a really good product .

This is a really good product. I bought this one as it has both optical and rf audio out in addition to HDMI.

<hl> This is a really good product <hl> .

<hl> This is a really good product <hl>. I bought this one as it has both optical and rf audio out in addition to HDMI.

<hl> This is a really good product . <hl> I bought this one as it has both optical and rf audio out in addition to HDMI.

4dd32e999ee137b511071e8b021e9430

electronics

This drive is so quiet and very fast

question: Is this drive safety?, context: I can say so far so good! I bought this hard drive to replace a seagate one which was starting to go completely out on me. I was just lucky enough to have been able to get all my data transfered before it totally quit. I heard this WD drive was one of the best and so far it has been running like a champ. I hope to buy another one of these once the price drops again...right now the price is nearly doubled what I paid for it. This drive is so quiet and very fast!

Is this drive safety?

This drive is so quiet and very fast !

I can say so far so good! I bought this hard drive to replace a seagate one which was starting to go completely out on me. I was just lucky enough to have been able to get all my data transfered before it totally quit. I heard this WD drive was one of the best and so far it has been running like a champ. I hope to buy another one of these once the price drops again...right now the price is nearly doubled what I paid for it. This drive is so quiet and very fast!

<hl> This drive is so quiet and very fast <hl> !

I can say so far so good! I bought this hard drive to replace a seagate one which was starting to go completely out on me. I was just lucky enough to have been able to get all my data transfered before it totally quit. I heard this WD drive was one of the best and so far it has been running like a champ. I hope to buy another one of these once the price drops again...right now the price is nearly doubled what I paid for it. <hl> This drive is so quiet and very fast <hl>!

I can say so far so good! I bought this hard drive to replace a seagate one which was starting to go completely out on me. I was just lucky enough to have been able to get all my data transfered before it totally quit. I heard this WD drive was one of the best and so far it has been running like a champ. I hope to buy another one of these once the price drops again...right now the price is nearly doubled what I paid for it. <hl> This drive is so quiet and very fast ! <hl>

27052231bc98d7b861aeda35d5cb9f1e

electronics

it sounds amazing, Bose headphones, get out of the way (seriously)! I love the new music menu features on the Zune HD. First off, the artist menu is amazing. It starts off with the artists picture in the background and it has the basic albums and songs side menues, then theres artists pictures, which you can use as your background by the way, it also has a full bio of the artist on another side menu which is awesome, who wouldn't love to get a background of the artist. With the new firmware update now also there is underlined part in the bio which allows you to click on them, which is normally artists or other albums, and you can use the devices wi-fi directly from the bio and go to the artist or other album and download it with the on-device marketplace. Whats also included is related artists, which has a picture list of all the related artists which you can click on to either access their artist menu, or go to the on-device marketplace and download their stuff. What I think is the best is the screensaver mode when you are listening to songs. It really takes advantage of the screen. It starts after around 15 seconds on not touching the screen. The artist picture is in the background and the information from the screen is scrolling around the screen in all different directions, if you have used the Zune software, you might have seen this feature. Its just the icing on the cake. Microsoft really did try to get the music exploration aspect in Zune and they did a very good job.Videos: Simple enough...with the screen all the videos look beautiful. You can either choose since the device is widescreen to either keep the video at its full screen and have black sides or zoom in and make the video full screen. I love that you have the choice to do that. Colors really show up on this device so if you plan to watch an animated tv show like Family Guy, you can actually tell what color the wall in the background is.Zune Pass: Genius...$15 a month for unlimited streaming of songs and you get to keep 10 of those songs each month. So if you compare

question: What is the quality of the headphones?, context: As an all out Zune owner, I have always enjoyed the devices and how they would update their devices with all the new features every year, including the old brick zunes. Since they weren't going to do it this time, I knew it was time to upgrade. I got a 32gb HD with no hesitation, there are a couple of things that you need to know about if you really want this compared to the Apple Ipod Touch.What I think is the best part about the Zune HD is its beautiful OLED screen. You don't know how beautiful a video or picture can look on a small device until you look at it on the Zune HD. The black quality on the screen is amazing and the colors are so vivid. Some of the features on the device is really helped out by the beautiful screen that this device possesses.Graphics: With a stripped down version of the nVidia Tegra chip inside the device, you can not go wrong. It has 8 processors making the device working at its best. It will definitely help once 3D games come to the device. Can't wait for that to happen!!!Software and Marketplace: The Zune software is...nice, could be better, could be worse. I like that it is customizable unlike Itunes. The marketplace is pretty, it could definitely have more videos and movies, but lets not forget that they just started with movies when the Zune HD came out. Still, many of the TV shows that I have like watching on CBS and FOX are NOT on the Zune Marketplace, which disappoints me. This can be apart of the review because this is the only software that the Zune is compatible with. Yes, its only on PC, its so sad that people with Macs can't use it, that 5-10% that can just use boot camp to use it. I mean seriously Mac users, get over it, YOU CAN USE IT!!! I have always like the wireless sync feature just in case I just don't want to find my sync cord you can just bring up the software and on the device just click wireless sync. Podcasts are handled on the Zune software. The catalog of podcasts are not as big on Itunes, but that is not such a big deal. What is great about it is that you can choose how many that you want to keep on your computer, so it automatically deletes on the ones that get old or outdated. You can also choose which ones to automatically sync to the device. Whether it be all of them, or just the ones that haven't been played yet and the ones that get played on the device get deleted after you watch.Apps: No store here. People who want a device for apps, its not here. The Zune HD has a very few simple games and only 2 applications. Microsoft has promised that they will be adding more to the catalog eventually, but its not here. The games and apps that they already for the device are nice to have. I always the Texas Hold 'Em game, simple but nice. The newest update allows 3D gaming which is great. Audiosurf Tilt is simply amazing with the screen. They are all free, thats a plus, but the catch is there are short advertisements before the games come up. Thats not such a big deal if you can get all of their stuff for free. I would much rather, though, pay for a valuable app from other developers. Microsoft has to keep with the times and allow other developers to create their own apps. Once Microsoft actually reads something from their reviewers and listens to them, they might get somewhere even further.UI: Beautiful, Microsoft was really working to create an interface for a touch device. They did a beautiful job at doing so. The searching for media on the device is so easy and very quick to learn. I absolutely LOVE the sidebar on the main screen. You just click on the left side of the main screen and this other screen comes up with "Pins", which are basically songs, pics, or videos that you like you can pin to the side bar so you can quickly access that when you turn it on. The next feature on that screen is history, which shows everything that you have been doing on the device like songs that you just recently listened to, podcasts, or websites that you view on the web browser. The last feature on that screen is "New" which shows the newest things that you recently added to the device so if you just added a song to the device, just go to the history screen and you can easily play the song without going through any menus. You can also delete ANYTHING that you want off your device by just clicking on the item. I know that the Ipod Touch does this, just not with everything.Music and features: Sound playback has always been the best on the Zune. They decided to bring the basic EQ back to the device, which is nice...just not nice enough. A customizable EQ would be great. You don't even need an EQ if you have the Zune premium headphones, with both of them together, it sounds amazing, Bose headphones, get out of the way (seriously)! I love the new music menu features on the Zune HD. First off, the artist menu is amazing. It starts off with the artists picture in the background and it has the basic albums and songs side menues, then theres artists pictures, which you can use as your background by the way, it also has a full bio of the artist on another side menu which is awesome, who wouldn't love to get a background of the artist. With the new firmware update now also there is underlined part in the bio which allows you to click on them, which is normally artists or other albums, and you can use the devices wi-fi directly from the bio and go to the artist or other album and download it with the on-device marketplace. Whats also included is related artists, which has a picture list of all the related artists which you can click on to either access their artist menu, or go to the on-device marketplace and download their stuff. What I think is the best is the screensaver mode when you are listening to songs. It really takes advantage of the screen. It starts after around 15 seconds on not touching the screen. The artist picture is in the background and the information from the screen is scrolling around the screen in all different directions, if you have used the Zune software, you might have seen this feature. Its just the icing on the cake. Microsoft really did try to get the music exploration aspect in Zune and they did a very good job.Videos: Simple enough...with the screen all the videos look beautiful. You can either choose since the device is widescreen to either keep the video at its full screen and have black sides or zoom in and make the video full screen. I love that you have the choice to do that. Colors really show up on this device so if you plan to watch an animated tv show like Family Guy, you can actually tell what color the wall in the background is.Zune Pass: Genius...$15 a month for unlimited streaming of songs and you get to keep 10 of those songs each month. So if you compare it to Itunes...10 songs for $1.29, you spend $13 on 10 songs that you get to keep and that means you get unlimited streaming to millions of songs for just $2 a month. What a bargain!!! You also get the the Zune Pass with the On-device marketplace. You can download songs to the device right from the online device marketplace and even when you get offline, you can still continue listening to it. I love the zune pass and its definitely worth it if you love music.On-Device Markeplace - Very nice to have, especially if you have the Zune Pass. They also have the very few apps on the marketplace and you can download updates right from the marketplace, but there hasn't been any updates to the 7 games that Microsoft supplies.Pictures: Beautiful, scrolling to the next picture and rendering the picture from horizontal to landscape takes not time. It uses the same multi-touch feature to zoom and is quite useful. Overall...nice.Radio: This is one of Microsoft's selling points. This radio is FM AND HD radio. Too bad I don't live near any main radio station that include HD radio stations. I don't really see any improvements in the radio either. When I go to the city, I will let you guys know. What I have always loved about the radio is the tag to FM feature, which is when you get a clear enough reception, it will show the title of the radio station and the song that is playing currently. You can tag that song and add it to your cart which you can download with the marketplace. That is a great way to get introduced and familiar with new music.Social: Still evolving...not there yet. I am so sad that they took away the song and podcast sharing from zune to zune wirelessly. Its gone, now there is a way to send songs with an email address or zune tag (or xbox live gamertag) when you plug your zune back into the computer. What they did do is add your zune inbox if your account is synced with your device, and it displays on your device...which is nice. But it is still sad that they took away the wireless song sharing feature. (It still works with the older models if you still have one!)Internet browser: OK...not as good as the Ipod Touch safari browser. There is no flash...yet. But you get the choice to either use the internet browser as a mobile browser or you can view sites in their desktop format, its a choice in the internet settings menu. The keyboard is small, but isn't every PMP keyboard? The added auto-correct features with the new firmware update, but it is still not as good as safari.This was a complete and honest review. I love Zune and I have always thought about going back to Ipod, but Zune keeps coming out with new devices that can not be refused. Music and video playback and exploration...Zune is the one and only way to go. No other device does it as good as Zune. Applications and web browsing are better for the Ipod people. Unlimited streaming of music and keeping 10 songs a month, go Zune. Paying individual songs at $1.29 a month to keep forever, go with Ipod. There are so many things that I listed on here and probably a couple of other things that would affect your decision. But I hope that this helped.5/17 update...1. the newest zune update got rid of all of the advertisements before the apps started2. There are now around 20 apps for the HD including facebook and twitter...still nothing special. Let's just hope the the Windows 7 series phones apps will be compatible.3. CBS and FOX have both been added to the Zune Marketplace4. They have added the Smart DJ feature to the HD device (like Genius on the ipod, but actually gets better results)5. Direct Xvid compatibility...you don't know how much better that made this thing. Makes the Zune way more compatible that now you can directly add .avi files without converting first.6. Internet browser got better, faster tilt sensitivity and faster overall experience. You can take snapshots of what is on the screen while surfing and save it to the device in pictures.

What is the quality of the headphones?

You don't even need an EQ if you have the Zune premium headphones, with both of them together, it sounds amazing, Bose headphones, get out of the way (seriously)! I love the new music menu features on the Zune HD. First off, the artist menu is amazing. It starts off with the artists picture in the background and it has the basic albums and songs side menues, then theres artists pictures, which you can use as your background by the way, it also has a full bio of the artist on another side menu which is awesome, who wouldn't love to get a background of the artist. With the new firmware update now also there is underlined part in the bio which allows you to click on them, which is normally artists or other albums, and you can use the devices wi-fi directly from the bio and go to the artist or other album and download it with the on-device marketplace. Whats also included is related artists, which has a picture list of all the related artists which you can click on to either access their artist menu, or go to the on-device marketplace and download their stuff. What I think is the best is the screensaver mode when you are listening to songs. It really takes advantage of the screen. It starts after around 15 seconds on not touching the screen. The artist picture is in the background and the information from the screen is scrolling around the screen in all different directions, if you have used the Zune software, you might have seen this feature. Its just the icing on the cake. Microsoft really did try to get the music exploration aspect in Zune and they did a very good job.Videos: Simple enough...with the screen all the videos look beautiful. You can either choose since the device is widescreen to either keep the video at its full screen and have black sides or zoom in and make the video full screen. I love that you have the choice to do that. Colors really show up on this device so if you plan to watch an animated tv show like Family Guy, you can actually tell what color the wall in the background is.Zune Pass: Genius...$15 a month for unlimited streaming of songs and you get to keep 10 of those songs each month. So if you compare it to Itunes...10 songs for $1.29, you spend $13 on 10 songs that you get to keep and that means you get unlimited streaming to millions of songs for just $2 a month.

As an all out Zune owner, I have always enjoyed the devices and how they would update their devices with all the new features every year, including the old brick zunes. Since they weren't going to do it this time, I knew it was time to upgrade. I got a 32gb HD with no hesitation, there are a couple of things that you need to know about if you really want this compared to the Apple Ipod Touch.What I think is the best part about the Zune HD is its beautiful OLED screen. You don't know how beautiful a video or picture can look on a small device until you look at it on the Zune HD. The black quality on the screen is amazing and the colors are so vivid. Some of the features on the device is really helped out by the beautiful screen that this device possesses.Graphics: With a stripped down version of the nVidia Tegra chip inside the device, you can not go wrong. It has 8 processors making the device working at its best. It will definitely help once 3D games come to the device. Can't wait for that to happen!!!Software and Marketplace: The Zune software is...nice, could be better, could be worse. I like that it is customizable unlike Itunes. The marketplace is pretty, it could definitely have more videos and movies, but lets not forget that they just started with movies when the Zune HD came out. Still, many of the TV shows that I have like watching on CBS and FOX are NOT on the Zune Marketplace, which disappoints me. This can be apart of the review because this is the only software that the Zune is compatible with. Yes, its only on PC, its so sad that people with Macs can't use it, that 5-10% that can just use boot camp to use it. I mean seriously Mac users, get over it, YOU CAN USE IT!!! I have always like the wireless sync feature just in case I just don't want to find my sync cord you can just bring up the software and on the device just click wireless sync. Podcasts are handled on the Zune software. The catalog of podcasts are not as big on Itunes, but that is not such a big deal. What is great about it is that you can choose how many that you want to keep on your computer, so it automatically deletes on the ones that get old or outdated. You can also choose which ones to automatically sync to the device. Whether it be all of them, or just the ones that haven't been played yet and the ones that get played on the device get deleted after you watch.Apps: No store here. People who want a device for apps, its not here. The Zune HD has a very few simple games and only 2 applications. Microsoft has promised that they will be adding more to the catalog eventually, but its not here. The games and apps that they already for the device are nice to have. I always the Texas Hold 'Em game, simple but nice. The newest update allows 3D gaming which is great. Audiosurf Tilt is simply amazing with the screen. They are all free, thats a plus, but the catch is there are short advertisements before the games come up. Thats not such a big deal if you can get all of their stuff for free. I would much rather, though, pay for a valuable app from other developers. Microsoft has to keep with the times and allow other developers to create their own apps. Once Microsoft actually reads something from their reviewers and listens to them, they might get somewhere even further.UI: Beautiful, Microsoft was really working to create an interface for a touch device. They did a beautiful job at doing so. The searching for media on the device is so easy and very quick to learn. I absolutely LOVE the sidebar on the main screen. You just click on the left side of the main screen and this other screen comes up with "Pins", which are basically songs, pics, or videos that you like you can pin to the side bar so you can quickly access that when you turn it on. The next feature on that screen is history, which shows everything that you have been doing on the device like songs that you just recently listened to, podcasts, or websites that you view on the web browser. The last feature on that screen is "New" which shows the newest things that you recently added to the device so if you just added a song to the device, just go to the history screen and you can easily play the song without going through any menus. You can also delete ANYTHING that you want off your device by just clicking on the item. I know that the Ipod Touch does this, just not with everything.Music and features: Sound playback has always been the best on the Zune. They decided to bring the basic EQ back to the device, which is nice...just not nice enough. A customizable EQ would be great. You don't even need an EQ if you have the Zune premium headphones, with both of them together, it sounds amazing, Bose headphones, get out of the way (seriously)! I love the new music menu features on the Zune HD. First off, the artist menu is amazing. It starts off with the artists picture in the background and it has the basic albums and songs side menues, then theres artists pictures, which you can use as your background by the way, it also has a full bio of the artist on another side menu which is awesome, who wouldn't love to get a background of the artist. With the new firmware update now also there is underlined part in the bio which allows you to click on them, which is normally artists or other albums, and you can use the devices wi-fi directly from the bio and go to the artist or other album and download it with the on-device marketplace. Whats also included is related artists, which has a picture list of all the related artists which you can click on to either access their artist menu, or go to the on-device marketplace and download their stuff. What I think is the best is the screensaver mode when you are listening to songs. It really takes advantage of the screen. It starts after around 15 seconds on not touching the screen. The artist picture is in the background and the information from the screen is scrolling around the screen in all different directions, if you have used the Zune software, you might have seen this feature. Its just the icing on the cake. Microsoft really did try to get the music exploration aspect in Zune and they did a very good job.Videos: Simple enough...with the screen all the videos look beautiful. You can either choose since the device is widescreen to either keep the video at its full screen and have black sides or zoom in and make the video full screen. I love that you have the choice to do that. Colors really show up on this device so if you plan to watch an animated tv show like Family Guy, you can actually tell what color the wall in the background is.Zune Pass: Genius...$15 a month for unlimited streaming of songs and you get to keep 10 of those songs each month. So if you compare it to Itunes...10 songs for $1.29, you spend $13 on 10 songs that you get to keep and that means you get unlimited streaming to millions of songs for just $2 a month. What a bargain!!! You also get the the Zune Pass with the On-device marketplace. You can download songs to the device right from the online device marketplace and even when you get offline, you can still continue listening to it. I love the zune pass and its definitely worth it if you love music.On-Device Markeplace - Very nice to have, especially if you have the Zune Pass. They also have the very few apps on the marketplace and you can download updates right from the marketplace, but there hasn't been any updates to the 7 games that Microsoft supplies.Pictures: Beautiful, scrolling to the next picture and rendering the picture from horizontal to landscape takes not time. It uses the same multi-touch feature to zoom and is quite useful. Overall...nice.Radio: This is one of Microsoft's selling points. This radio is FM AND HD radio. Too bad I don't live near any main radio station that include HD radio stations. I don't really see any improvements in the radio either. When I go to the city, I will let you guys know. What I have always loved about the radio is the tag to FM feature, which is when you get a clear enough reception, it will show the title of the radio station and the song that is playing currently. You can tag that song and add it to your cart which you can download with the marketplace. That is a great way to get introduced and familiar with new music.Social: Still evolving...not there yet. I am so sad that they took away the song and podcast sharing from zune to zune wirelessly. Its gone, now there is a way to send songs with an email address or zune tag (or xbox live gamertag) when you plug your zune back into the computer. What they did do is add your zune inbox if your account is synced with your device, and it displays on your device...which is nice. But it is still sad that they took away the wireless song sharing feature. (It still works with the older models if you still have one!)Internet browser: OK...not as good as the Ipod Touch safari browser. There is no flash...yet. But you get the choice to either use the internet browser as a mobile browser or you can view sites in their desktop format, its a choice in the internet settings menu. The keyboard is small, but isn't every PMP keyboard? The added auto-correct features with the new firmware update, but it is still not as good as safari.This was a complete and honest review. I love Zune and I have always thought about going back to Ipod, but Zune keeps coming out with new devices that can not be refused. Music and video playback and exploration...Zune is the one and only way to go. No other device does it as good as Zune. Applications and web browsing are better for the Ipod people. Unlimited streaming of music and keeping 10 songs a month, go Zune. Paying individual songs at $1.29 a month to keep forever, go with Ipod. There are so many things that I listed on here and probably a couple of other things that would affect your decision. But I hope that this helped.5/17 update...1. the newest zune update got rid of all of the advertisements before the apps started2. There are now around 20 apps for the HD including facebook and twitter...still nothing special. Let's just hope the the Windows 7 series phones apps will be compatible.3. CBS and FOX have both been added to the Zune Marketplace4. They have added the Smart DJ feature to the HD device (like Genius on the ipod, but actually gets better results)5. Direct Xvid compatibility...you don't know how much better that made this thing. Makes the Zune way more compatible that now you can directly add .avi files without converting first.6. Internet browser got better, faster tilt sensitivity and faster overall experience. You can take snapshots of what is on the screen while surfing and save it to the device in pictures.

You don't even need an EQ if you have the Zune premium headphones, with both of them together, <hl> it sounds amazing, Bose headphones, get out of the way (seriously)! I love the new music menu features on the Zune HD. First off, the artist menu is amazing. It starts off with the artists picture in the background and it has the basic albums and songs side menues, then theres artists pictures, which you can use as your background by the way, it also has a full bio of the artist on another side menu which is awesome, who wouldn't love to get a background of the artist. With the new firmware update now also there is underlined part in the bio which allows you to click on them, which is normally artists or other albums, and you can use the devices wi-fi directly from the bio and go to the artist or other album and download it with the on-device marketplace. Whats also included is related artists, which has a picture list of all the related artists which you can click on to either access their artist menu, or go to the on-device marketplace and download their stuff. What I think is the best is the screensaver mode when you are listening to songs. It really takes advantage of the screen. It starts after around 15 seconds on not touching the screen. The artist picture is in the background and the information from the screen is scrolling around the screen in all different directions, if you have used the Zune software, you might have seen this feature. Its just the icing on the cake. Microsoft really did try to get the music exploration aspect in Zune and they did a very good job.Videos: Simple enough...with the screen all the videos look beautiful. You can either choose since the device is widescreen to either keep the video at its full screen and have black sides or zoom in and make the video full screen. I love that you have the choice to do that. Colors really show up on this device so if you plan to watch an animated tv show like Family Guy, you can actually tell what color the wall in the background is.Zune Pass: Genius...$15 a month for unlimited streaming of songs and you get to keep 10 of those songs each month. So if you compare <hl> it to Itunes...10 songs for $1.29, you spend $13 on 10 songs that you get to keep and that means you get unlimited streaming to millions of songs for just $2 a month.

As an all out Zune owner, I have always enjoyed the devices and how they would update their devices with all the new features every year, including the old brick zunes. Since they weren't going to do it this time, I knew it was time to upgrade. I got a 32gb HD with no hesitation, there are a couple of things that you need to know about if you really want this compared to the Apple Ipod Touch.What I think is the best part about the Zune HD is its beautiful OLED screen. You don't know how beautiful a video or picture can look on a small device until you look at it on the Zune HD. The black quality on the screen is amazing and the colors are so vivid. Some of the features on the device is really helped out by the beautiful screen that this device possesses.Graphics: With a stripped down version of the nVidia Tegra chip inside the device, you can not go wrong. It has 8 processors making the device working at its best. It will definitely help once 3D games come to the device. Can't wait for that to happen!!!Software and Marketplace: The Zune software is...nice, could be better, could be worse. I like that it is customizable unlike Itunes. The marketplace is pretty, it could definitely have more videos and movies, but lets not forget that they just started with movies when the Zune HD came out. Still, many of the TV shows that I have like watching on CBS and FOX are NOT on the Zune Marketplace, which disappoints me. This can be apart of the review because this is the only software that the Zune is compatible with. Yes, its only on PC, its so sad that people with Macs can't use it, that 5-10% that can just use boot camp to use it. I mean seriously Mac users, get over it, YOU CAN USE IT!!! I have always like the wireless sync feature just in case I just don't want to find my sync cord you can just bring up the software and on the device just click wireless sync. Podcasts are handled on the Zune software. The catalog of podcasts are not as big on Itunes, but that is not such a big deal. What is great about it is that you can choose how many that you want to keep on your computer, so it automatically deletes on the ones that get old or outdated. You can also choose which ones to automatically sync to the device. Whether it be all of them, or just the ones that haven't been played yet and the ones that get played on the device get deleted after you watch.Apps: No store here. People who want a device for apps, its not here. The Zune HD has a very few simple games and only 2 applications. Microsoft has promised that they will be adding more to the catalog eventually, but its not here. The games and apps that they already for the device are nice to have. I always the Texas Hold 'Em game, simple but nice. The newest update allows 3D gaming which is great. Audiosurf Tilt is simply amazing with the screen. They are all free, thats a plus, but the catch is there are short advertisements before the games come up. Thats not such a big deal if you can get all of their stuff for free. I would much rather, though, pay for a valuable app from other developers. Microsoft has to keep with the times and allow other developers to create their own apps. Once Microsoft actually reads something from their reviewers and listens to them, they might get somewhere even further.UI: Beautiful, Microsoft was really working to create an interface for a touch device. They did a beautiful job at doing so. The searching for media on the device is so easy and very quick to learn. I absolutely LOVE the sidebar on the main screen. You just click on the left side of the main screen and this other screen comes up with "Pins", which are basically songs, pics, or videos that you like you can pin to the side bar so you can quickly access that when you turn it on. The next feature on that screen is history, which shows everything that you have been doing on the device like songs that you just recently listened to, podcasts, or websites that you view on the web browser. The last feature on that screen is "New" which shows the newest things that you recently added to the device so if you just added a song to the device, just go to the history screen and you can easily play the song without going through any menus. You can also delete ANYTHING that you want off your device by just clicking on the item. I know that the Ipod Touch does this, just not with everything.Music and features: Sound playback has always been the best on the Zune. They decided to bring the basic EQ back to the device, which is nice...just not nice enough. A customizable EQ would be great. You don't even need an EQ if you have the Zune premium headphones, with both of them together, <hl> it sounds amazing, Bose headphones, get out of the way (seriously)! I love the new music menu features on the Zune HD. First off, the artist menu is amazing. It starts off with the artists picture in the background and it has the basic albums and songs side menues, then theres artists pictures, which you can use as your background by the way, it also has a full bio of the artist on another side menu which is awesome, who wouldn't love to get a background of the artist. With the new firmware update now also there is underlined part in the bio which allows you to click on them, which is normally artists or other albums, and you can use the devices wi-fi directly from the bio and go to the artist or other album and download it with the on-device marketplace. Whats also included is related artists, which has a picture list of all the related artists which you can click on to either access their artist menu, or go to the on-device marketplace and download their stuff. What I think is the best is the screensaver mode when you are listening to songs. It really takes advantage of the screen. It starts after around 15 seconds on not touching the screen. The artist picture is in the background and the information from the screen is scrolling around the screen in all different directions, if you have used the Zune software, you might have seen this feature. Its just the icing on the cake. Microsoft really did try to get the music exploration aspect in Zune and they did a very good job.Videos: Simple enough...with the screen all the videos look beautiful. You can either choose since the device is widescreen to either keep the video at its full screen and have black sides or zoom in and make the video full screen. I love that you have the choice to do that. Colors really show up on this device so if you plan to watch an animated tv show like Family Guy, you can actually tell what color the wall in the background is.Zune Pass: Genius...$15 a month for unlimited streaming of songs and you get to keep 10 of those songs each month. So if you compare <hl> it to Itunes...10 songs for $1.29, you spend $13 on 10 songs that you get to keep and that means you get unlimited streaming to millions of songs for just $2 a month. What a bargain!!! You also get the the Zune Pass with the On-device marketplace. You can download songs to the device right from the online device marketplace and even when you get offline, you can still continue listening to it. I love the zune pass and its definitely worth it if you love music.On-Device Markeplace - Very nice to have, especially if you have the Zune Pass. They also have the very few apps on the marketplace and you can download updates right from the marketplace, but there hasn't been any updates to the 7 games that Microsoft supplies.Pictures: Beautiful, scrolling to the next picture and rendering the picture from horizontal to landscape takes not time. It uses the same multi-touch feature to zoom and is quite useful. Overall...nice.Radio: This is one of Microsoft's selling points. This radio is FM AND HD radio. Too bad I don't live near any main radio station that include HD radio stations. I don't really see any improvements in the radio either. When I go to the city, I will let you guys know. What I have always loved about the radio is the tag to FM feature, which is when you get a clear enough reception, it will show the title of the radio station and the song that is playing currently. You can tag that song and add it to your cart which you can download with the marketplace. That is a great way to get introduced and familiar with new music.Social: Still evolving...not there yet. I am so sad that they took away the song and podcast sharing from zune to zune wirelessly. Its gone, now there is a way to send songs with an email address or zune tag (or xbox live gamertag) when you plug your zune back into the computer. What they did do is add your zune inbox if your account is synced with your device, and it displays on your device...which is nice. But it is still sad that they took away the wireless song sharing feature. (It still works with the older models if you still have one!)Internet browser: OK...not as good as the Ipod Touch safari browser. There is no flash...yet. But you get the choice to either use the internet browser as a mobile browser or you can view sites in their desktop format, its a choice in the internet settings menu. The keyboard is small, but isn't every PMP keyboard? The added auto-correct features with the new firmware update, but it is still not as good as safari.This was a complete and honest review. I love Zune and I have always thought about going back to Ipod, but Zune keeps coming out with new devices that can not be refused. Music and video playback and exploration...Zune is the one and only way to go. No other device does it as good as Zune. Applications and web browsing are better for the Ipod people. Unlimited streaming of music and keeping 10 songs a month, go Zune. Paying individual songs at $1.29 a month to keep forever, go with Ipod. There are so many things that I listed on here and probably a couple of other things that would affect your decision. But I hope that this helped.5/17 update...1. the newest zune update got rid of all of the advertisements before the apps started2. There are now around 20 apps for the HD including facebook and twitter...still nothing special. Let's just hope the the Windows 7 series phones apps will be compatible.3. CBS and FOX have both been added to the Zune Marketplace4. They have added the Smart DJ feature to the HD device (like Genius on the ipod, but actually gets better results)5. Direct Xvid compatibility...you don't know how much better that made this thing. Makes the Zune way more compatible that now you can directly add .avi files without converting first.6. Internet browser got better, faster tilt sensitivity and faster overall experience. You can take snapshots of what is on the screen while surfing and save it to the device in pictures.

As an all out Zune owner, I have always enjoyed the devices and how they would update their devices with all the new features every year, including the old brick zunes. Since they weren't going to do it this time, I knew it was time to upgrade. I got a 32gb HD with no hesitation, there are a couple of things that you need to know about if you really want this compared to the Apple Ipod Touch. What I think is the best part about the Zune HD is its beautiful OLED screen. You don't know how beautiful a video or picture can look on a small device until you look at it on the Zune HD. The black quality on the screen is amazing and the colors are so vivid. Some of the features on the device is really helped out by the beautiful screen that this device possesses. Graphics: With a stripped down version of the nVidia Tegra chip inside the device, you can not go wrong. It has 8 processors making the device working at its best. It will definitely help once 3D games come to the device. Can't wait for that to happen!!!Software and Marketplace: The Zune software is...nice, could be better, could be worse. I like that it is customizable unlike Itunes. The marketplace is pretty, it could definitely have more videos and movies, but lets not forget that they just started with movies when the Zune HD came out. Still, many of the TV shows that I have like watching on CBS and FOX are NOT on the Zune Marketplace, which disappoints me. This can be apart of the review because this is the only software that the Zune is compatible with. Yes, its only on PC, its so sad that people with Macs can't use it, that 5-10% that can just use boot camp to use it. I mean seriously Mac users, get over it, YOU CAN USE IT!!! I have always like the wireless sync feature just in case I just don't want to find my sync cord you can just bring up the software and on the device just click wireless sync. Podcasts are handled on the Zune software. The catalog of podcasts are not as big on Itunes, but that is not such a big deal. What is great about it is that you can choose how many that you want to keep on your computer, so it automatically deletes on the ones that get old or outdated. You can also choose which ones to automatically sync to the device. Whether it be all of them, or just the ones that haven't been played yet and the ones that get played on the device get deleted after you watch. Apps: No store here. People who want a device for apps, its not here. The Zune HD has a very few simple games and only 2 applications. Microsoft has promised that they will be adding more to the catalog eventually, but its not here. The games and apps that they already for the device are nice to have. I always the Texas Hold 'Em game, simple but nice. The newest update allows 3D gaming which is great. Audiosurf Tilt is simply amazing with the screen. They are all free, thats a plus, but the catch is there are short advertisements before the games come up. Thats not such a big deal if you can get all of their stuff for free. I would much rather, though, pay for a valuable app from other developers. Microsoft has to keep with the times and allow other developers to create their own apps. Once Microsoft actually reads something from their reviewers and listens to them, they might get somewhere even further. UI: Beautiful, Microsoft was really working to create an interface for a touch device. They did a beautiful job at doing so. The searching for media on the device is so easy and very quick to learn. I absolutely LOVE the sidebar on the main screen. You just click on the left side of the main screen and this other screen comes up with "Pins", which are basically songs, pics, or videos that you like you can pin to the side bar so you can quickly access that when you turn it on. The next feature on that screen is history, which shows everything that you have been doing on the device like songs that you just recently listened to, podcasts, or websites that you view on the web browser. The last feature on that screen is "New" which shows the newest things that you recently added to the device so if you just added a song to the device, just go to the history screen and you can easily play the song without going through any menus. You can also delete ANYTHING that you want off your device by just clicking on the item. I know that the Ipod Touch does this, just not with everything. Music and features: Sound playback has always been the best on the Zune. They decided to bring the basic EQ back to the device, which is nice...just not nice enough. A customizable EQ would be great. <hl> You don't even need an EQ if you have the Zune premium headphones, with both of them together, it sounds amazing, Bose headphones, get out of the way (seriously)! I love the new music menu features on the Zune HD. First off, the artist menu is amazing. It starts off with the artists picture in the background and it has the basic albums and songs side menues, then theres artists pictures, which you can use as your background by the way, it also has a full bio of the artist on another side menu which is awesome, who wouldn't love to get a background of the artist. With the new firmware update now also there is underlined part in the bio which allows you to click on them, which is normally artists or other albums, and you can use the devices wi-fi directly from the bio and go to the artist or other album and download it with the on-device marketplace. Whats also included is related artists, which has a picture list of all the related artists which you can click on to either access their artist menu, or go to the on-device marketplace and download their stuff. What I think is the best is the screensaver mode when you are listening to songs. It really takes advantage of the screen. It starts after around 15 seconds on not touching the screen. The artist picture is in the background and the information from the screen is scrolling around the screen in all different directions, if you have used the Zune software, you might have seen this feature. Its just the icing on the cake. Microsoft really did try to get the music exploration aspect in Zune and they did a very good job.Videos: Simple enough...with the screen all the videos look beautiful. You can either choose since the device is widescreen to either keep the video at its full screen and have black sides or zoom in and make the video full screen. I love that you have the choice to do that. Colors really show up on this device so if you plan to watch an animated tv show like Family Guy, you can actually tell what color the wall in the background is.Zune Pass: Genius...$15 a month for unlimited streaming of songs and you get to keep 10 of those songs each month. So if you compare it to Itunes...10 songs for $1.29, you spend $13 on 10 songs that you get to keep and that means you get unlimited streaming to millions of songs for just $2 a month. <hl> What a bargain!!! You also get the the Zune Pass with the On-device marketplace. You can download songs to the device right from the online device marketplace and even when you get offline, you can still continue listening to it. I love the zune pass and its definitely worth it if you love music. On-Device Markeplace - Very nice to have, especially if you have the Zune Pass. They also have the very few apps on the marketplace and you can download updates right from the marketplace, but there hasn't been any updates to the 7 games that Microsoft supplies. Pictures: Beautiful, scrolling to the next picture and rendering the picture from horizontal to landscape takes not time. It uses the same multi-touch feature to zoom and is quite useful. Overall...nice. Radio: This is one of Microsoft's selling points. This radio is FM AND HD radio. Too bad I don't live near any main radio station that include HD radio stations. I don't really see any improvements in the radio either. When I go to the city, I will let you guys know. What I have always loved about the radio is the tag to FM feature, which is when you get a clear enough reception, it will show the title of the radio station and the song that is playing currently. You can tag that song and add it to your cart which you can download with the marketplace. That is a great way to get introduced and familiar with new music. Social: Still evolving...not there yet. I am so sad that they took away the song and podcast sharing from zune to zune wirelessly. Its gone, now there is a way to send songs with an email address or zune tag (or xbox live gamertag) when you plug your zune back into the computer. What they did do is add your zune inbox if your account is synced with your device, and it displays on your device...which is nice. But it is still sad that they took away the wireless song sharing feature. (It still works with the older models if you still have one!)Internet browser: OK...not as good as the Ipod Touch safari browser. There is no flash...yet. But you get the choice to either use the internet browser as a mobile browser or you can view sites in their desktop format, its a choice in the internet settings menu. The keyboard is small, but isn't every PMP keyboard? The added auto-correct features with the new firmware update, but it is still not as good as safari. This was a complete and honest review. I love Zune and I have always thought about going back to Ipod, but Zune keeps coming out with new devices that can not be refused. Music and video playback and exploration... Zune is the one and only way to go. No other device does it as good as Zune. Applications and web browsing are better for the Ipod people. Unlimited streaming of music and keeping 10 songs a month, go Zune. Paying individual songs at $1.29 a month to keep forever, go with Ipod. There are so many things that I listed on here and probably a couple of other things that would affect your decision. But I hope that this helped.5/17 update...1. the newest zune update got rid of all of the advertisements before the apps started2. There are now around 20 apps for the HD including facebook and twitter...still nothing special. Let's just hope the the Windows 7 series phones apps will be compatible.3. CBS and FOX have both been added to the Zune Marketplace4. They have added the Smart DJ feature to the HD device (like Genius on the ipod, but actually gets better results)5. Direct Xvid compatibility...you don't know how much better that made this thing. Makes the Zune way more compatible that now you can directly add .avi files without converting first.6. Internet browser got better, faster tilt sensitivity and faster overall experience. You can take snapshots of what is on the screen while surfing and save it to the device in pictures.

c7db64b14e19928507c27df326ca3f10

electronics

The sound quality was amazing

question: What is the sound quality?, context: I enjoy this product up until the time be your buds stopped working. I attempted to contact customer service with no response. This is extremely disappointing as I have an exceptional past experience with klipsch audio. The sound quality was amazing but if you cannot follow that with build quality then there is no point.

What is the sound quality?

The sound quality was amazing but if you cannot follow that with build quality then there is no point.

I enjoy this product up until the time be your buds stopped working. I attempted to contact customer service with no response. This is extremely disappointing as I have an exceptional past experience with klipsch audio. The sound quality was amazing but if you cannot follow that with build quality then there is no point.

<hl> The sound quality was amazing <hl> but if you cannot follow that with build quality then there is no point.

I enjoy this product up until the time be your buds stopped working. I attempted to contact customer service with no response. This is extremely disappointing as I have an exceptional past experience with klipsch audio. <hl> The sound quality was amazing <hl> but if you cannot follow that with build quality then there is no point.

I enjoy this product up until the time be your buds stopped working. I attempted to contact customer service with no response. This is extremely disappointing as I have an exceptional past experience with klipsch audio. <hl> The sound quality was amazing but if you cannot follow that with build quality then there is no point. <hl>

661488c182c12237cf34116467736a7d

electronics

This camera performs like the pros. Fast accurate and easy to operated

question: How describe the camera?, context: Waited for a while for this camera to become available and was worth the wait. This camera performs like the pros. Fast accurate and easy to operated. The film speed and white balance controls are not in easy to adjust location as D300 which slows things down a tad. So far, low light noise is barely noticeable which is perfect for the work I do.I am getting used to sdhc memory cards and smaller batteries which are not compatible with D700 and D300.Great camera for an awesome price.

How describe the camera?

This camera performs like the pros. Fast accurate and easy to operated .

Waited for a while for this camera to become available and was worth the wait. This camera performs like the pros. Fast accurate and easy to operated. The film speed and white balance controls are not in easy to adjust location as D300 which slows things down a tad. So far, low light noise is barely noticeable which is perfect for the work I do.I am getting used to sdhc memory cards and smaller batteries which are not compatible with D700 and D300.Great camera for an awesome price.

<hl> This camera performs like the pros. Fast accurate and easy to operated <hl> .

Waited for a while for this camera to become available and was worth the wait.<hl> This camera performs like the pros. Fast accurate and easy to operated <hl>. The film speed and white balance controls are not in easy to adjust location as D300 which slows things down a tad. So far, low light noise is barely noticeable which is perfect for the work I do.I am getting used to sdhc memory cards and smaller batteries which are not compatible with D700 and D300.Great camera for an awesome price.

Waited for a while for this camera to become available and was worth the wait. <hl> This camera performs like the pros. Fast accurate and easy to operated . <hl> The film speed and white balance controls are not in easy to adjust location as D300 which slows things down a tad. So far, low light noise is barely noticeable which is perfect for the work I do. I am getting used to sdhc memory cards and smaller batteries which are not compatible with D700 and D300.Great camera for an awesome price.

aab0e37c93d9fe1737a6579381abb918

electronics

I do not give it 5 stars because the image quality is not full hd. Some movies might have poor image quality

question: How did you like the image quality?, context: Easy to install, and makes me enjoy listening to music and video clips at home on my tv. It also good to watch movies, such as Netflix. I do not give it 5 stars because the image quality is not full hd. Some movies might have poor image quality, as well.

How did you like the image quality?

I do not give it 5 stars because the image quality is not full hd. Some movies might have poor image quality , as well.

Easy to install, and makes me enjoy listening to music and video clips at home on my tv. It also good to watch movies, such as Netflix. I do not give it 5 stars because the image quality is not full hd. Some movies might have poor image quality, as well.

<hl> I do not give it 5 stars because the image quality is not full hd. Some movies might have poor image quality <hl> , as well.

Easy to install, and makes me enjoy listening to music and video clips at home on my tv. It also good to watch movies, such as Netflix. <hl> I do not give it 5 stars because the image quality is not full hd. Some movies might have poor image quality <hl>, as well.

Easy to install, and makes me enjoy listening to music and video clips at home on my tv. It also good to watch movies, such as Netflix. <hl> I do not give it 5 stars because the image quality is not full hd. Some movies might have poor image quality , as well. <hl>

3392a93f3aae5d3cb83c9dafc4a6736b

electronics

relatively short battery lifespan

question: How are battery?, context: Lets keep this brief. This is a comfortable, accurate gaming mouse with a relatively short battery lifespan. That being said, I love this mouse.I have a skinny hands with long fingers. This mouse fits me perfectly. There's a slight learning curve for the thumb buttons. However, I was hitting them perfectly within the first hour. The contour of the index finger buttons makes them especially familiar immediately. I have always preferred the contour of a Logitech mouse so none of this surprises me.In terms of tracking it works great, as it should. I use a Razer Exactmat speed surface so I predicted and received flawless tracking. Unfortunately I haven't tested this on any other surface so I can't comment.Others feel the battery life is poor. It seems to last three hours while gaming. I couldn't care less. Leaving the cord plugged into a USB port and sitting on the desk is simple. I've always had a corded mouse so it doesn't upset me to play while it charges.Weight has been a posted concern. I tested the mouse at the local electronics shop first and liked it. I tended to prefer maxing the weight on my old G5.Finally I couldn't help but comment on a faulty review posted below. The scroll wheel toggles to allow both free spinning and locking via a simple button smack dab in the middle of the mouse. Great for switching weapons or zipping through PDFs.All in all this may have been a frivolous purchase as my old G5 was running like a champ. Still I'm very pleased. The features are fantastic. Setpoint works like a champ for profiling. With all the extra buttons this mouse easily bests the G5 for any RPG.Update: 6 months later and I still enjoy the form and function of this mouse. Changing jobs I've discovered yet another application for it. With a [...] I take this into work everyday and really enjoy all the extra buttons for macro functions. I've opted to stay corded at work so that I don't forget to bring the receiver home again. With this beast and a few macros I've drastically cut my keystrokes for productivity applications. Thanks Logitech!

How are battery?

a relatively short battery lifespan .

Lets keep this brief. This is a comfortable, accurate gaming mouse with a relatively short battery lifespan. That being said, I love this mouse.I have a skinny hands with long fingers. This mouse fits me perfectly. There's a slight learning curve for the thumb buttons. However, I was hitting them perfectly within the first hour. The contour of the index finger buttons makes them especially familiar immediately. I have always preferred the contour of a Logitech mouse so none of this surprises me.In terms of tracking it works great, as it should. I use a Razer Exactmat speed surface so I predicted and received flawless tracking. Unfortunately I haven't tested this on any other surface so I can't comment.Others feel the battery life is poor. It seems to last three hours while gaming. I couldn't care less. Leaving the cord plugged into a USB port and sitting on the desk is simple. I've always had a corded mouse so it doesn't upset me to play while it charges.Weight has been a posted concern. I tested the mouse at the local electronics shop first and liked it. I tended to prefer maxing the weight on my old G5.Finally I couldn't help but comment on a faulty review posted below. The scroll wheel toggles to allow both free spinning and locking via a simple button smack dab in the middle of the mouse. Great for switching weapons or zipping through PDFs.All in all this may have been a frivolous purchase as my old G5 was running like a champ. Still I'm very pleased. The features are fantastic. Setpoint works like a champ for profiling. With all the extra buttons this mouse easily bests the G5 for any RPG.Update: 6 months later and I still enjoy the form and function of this mouse. Changing jobs I've discovered yet another application for it. With a [...] I take this into work everyday and really enjoy all the extra buttons for macro functions. I've opted to stay corded at work so that I don't forget to bring the receiver home again. With this beast and a few macros I've drastically cut my keystrokes for productivity applications. Thanks Logitech!

a <hl> relatively short battery lifespan <hl> .

Lets keep this brief. This is a comfortable, accurate gaming mouse with a <hl> relatively short battery lifespan <hl>. That being said, I love this mouse.I have a skinny hands with long fingers. This mouse fits me perfectly. There's a slight learning curve for the thumb buttons. However, I was hitting them perfectly within the first hour. The contour of the index finger buttons makes them especially familiar immediately. I have always preferred the contour of a Logitech mouse so none of this surprises me.In terms of tracking it works great, as it should. I use a Razer Exactmat speed surface so I predicted and received flawless tracking. Unfortunately I haven't tested this on any other surface so I can't comment.Others feel the battery life is poor. It seems to last three hours while gaming. I couldn't care less. Leaving the cord plugged into a USB port and sitting on the desk is simple. I've always had a corded mouse so it doesn't upset me to play while it charges.Weight has been a posted concern. I tested the mouse at the local electronics shop first and liked it. I tended to prefer maxing the weight on my old G5.Finally I couldn't help but comment on a faulty review posted below. The scroll wheel toggles to allow both free spinning and locking via a simple button smack dab in the middle of the mouse. Great for switching weapons or zipping through PDFs.All in all this may have been a frivolous purchase as my old G5 was running like a champ. Still I'm very pleased. The features are fantastic. Setpoint works like a champ for profiling. With all the extra buttons this mouse easily bests the G5 for any RPG.Update: 6 months later and I still enjoy the form and function of this mouse. Changing jobs I've discovered yet another application for it. With a [...] I take this into work everyday and really enjoy all the extra buttons for macro functions. I've opted to stay corded at work so that I don't forget to bring the receiver home again. With this beast and a few macros I've drastically cut my keystrokes for productivity applications. Thanks Logitech!

Lets keep this brief. This is a comfortable, accurate gaming mouse with <hl> a relatively short battery lifespan . <hl> That being said, I love this mouse. I have a skinny hands with long fingers. This mouse fits me perfectly. There's a slight learning curve for the thumb buttons. However, I was hitting them perfectly within the first hour. The contour of the index finger buttons makes them especially familiar immediately. I have always preferred the contour of a Logitech mouse so none of this surprises me. In terms of tracking it works great, as it should. I use a Razer Exactmat speed surface so I predicted and received flawless tracking. Unfortunately I haven't tested this on any other surface so I can't comment. Others feel the battery life is poor. It seems to last three hours while gaming. I couldn't care less. Leaving the cord plugged into a USB port and sitting on the desk is simple. I've always had a corded mouse so it doesn't upset me to play while it charges. Weight has been a posted concern. I tested the mouse at the local electronics shop first and liked it. I tended to prefer maxing the weight on my old G5.Finally I couldn't help but comment on a faulty review posted below. The scroll wheel toggles to allow both free spinning and locking via a simple button smack dab in the middle of the mouse. Great for switching weapons or zipping through PDFs. All in all this may have been a frivolous purchase as my old G5 was running like a champ. Still I'm very pleased. The features are fantastic. Setpoint works like a champ for profiling. With all the extra buttons this mouse easily bests the G5 for any RPG.Update: 6 months later and I still enjoy the form and function of this mouse. Changing jobs I've discovered yet another application for it. With a [...] I take this into work everyday and really enjoy all the extra buttons for macro functions. I've opted to stay corded at work so that I don't forget to bring the receiver home again. With this beast and a few macros I've drastically cut my keystrokes for productivity applications. Thanks Logitech!

726db33a51826c1b73e72591b610b00b

electronics

The good news is that these earbuds sound pretty good.

question: Is the review rating not good?, context: The good news is that these earbuds sound pretty good. Because they come with several different sizes of soft rubber earpieces, they are more comfortable than the buds shipped with most players.The bad news is that these buds do nothing to reduce sound. If you are planning on using them on the bus, for instance, you will find that background noise is no different from using the usual cheap phones.Construction on these is really flimsy. The cord is the thickness of a piece of embroidery thread. With daily use, I don't expect them to last much more than a month.For comparison, I have previously used theShure E2c Sound Isolating EarphonesandKoss SPARKPLUG - Stereo In Ear Ear Plugsphones. Both provided far superior noise reduction; the Shure qualify as a deluxe set of earplugs, very nice on airplanes. The Shure provided much better sound quality, the Koss was about the same sound quality. Both were better construction (though both were still broken within a year). The Koss was about equally comfortable; the Shure was much more comfortable, due both to better design and a wider selection of earpieces. Currently Amazon is listing the Koss for $13 and the Shure for about $70. Both are better buys.

Is the review rating not good?

The good news is that these earbuds sound pretty good. Because they come with several different sizes of soft rubber earpieces, they are more comfortable than the buds shipped with most players.

The good news is that these earbuds sound pretty good. Because they come with several different sizes of soft rubber earpieces, they are more comfortable than the buds shipped with most players.The bad news is that these buds do nothing to reduce sound. If you are planning on using them on the bus, for instance, you will find that background noise is no different from using the usual cheap phones.Construction on these is really flimsy. The cord is the thickness of a piece of embroidery thread. With daily use, I don't expect them to last much more than a month.For comparison, I have previously used theShure E2c Sound Isolating EarphonesandKoss SPARKPLUG - Stereo In Ear Ear Plugsphones. Both provided far superior noise reduction; the Shure qualify as a deluxe set of earplugs, very nice on airplanes. The Shure provided much better sound quality, the Koss was about the same sound quality. Both were better construction (though both were still broken within a year). The Koss was about equally comfortable; the Shure was much more comfortable, due both to better design and a wider selection of earpieces. Currently Amazon is listing the Koss for $13 and the Shure for about $70. Both are better buys.

<hl> The good news is that these earbuds sound pretty good. <hl> Because they come with several different sizes of soft rubber earpieces, they are more comfortable than the buds shipped with most players.

<hl> The good news is that these earbuds sound pretty good. <hl> Because they come with several different sizes of soft rubber earpieces, they are more comfortable than the buds shipped with most players.The bad news is that these buds do nothing to reduce sound. If you are planning on using them on the bus, for instance, you will find that background noise is no different from using the usual cheap phones.Construction on these is really flimsy. The cord is the thickness of a piece of embroidery thread. With daily use, I don't expect them to last much more than a month.For comparison, I have previously used theShure E2c Sound Isolating EarphonesandKoss SPARKPLUG - Stereo In Ear Ear Plugsphones. Both provided far superior noise reduction; the Shure qualify as a deluxe set of earplugs, very nice on airplanes. The Shure provided much better sound quality, the Koss was about the same sound quality. Both were better construction (though both were still broken within a year). The Koss was about equally comfortable; the Shure was much more comfortable, due both to better design and a wider selection of earpieces. Currently Amazon is listing the Koss for $13 and the Shure for about $70. Both are better buys.

<hl> The good news is that these earbuds sound pretty good. Because they come with several different sizes of soft rubber earpieces, they are more comfortable than the buds shipped with most players. <hl> The bad news is that these buds do nothing to reduce sound. If you are planning on using them on the bus, for instance, you will find that background noise is no different from using the usual cheap phones. Construction on these is really flimsy. The cord is the thickness of a piece of embroidery thread. With daily use, I don't expect them to last much more than a month. For comparison, I have previously used theShure E2c Sound Isolating EarphonesandKoss SPARKPLUG - Stereo In Ear Ear Plugsphones. Both provided far superior noise reduction; the Shure qualify as a deluxe set of earplugs, very nice on airplanes. The Shure provided much better sound quality, the Koss was about the same sound quality. Both were better construction (though both were still broken within a year). The Koss was about equally comfortable; the Shure was much more comfortable, due both to better design and a wider selection of earpieces. Currently Amazon is listing the Koss for $13 and the Shure for about $70. Both are better buys.

f6d603166052204a70afc82ba019ca02

electronics

has great bass response

question: How is the bass?, context: I have had Koss headphones in the past, Pro 4AA and QZ-99. The Koss Portapro is portable AND has great bass response. The work great with my Android phone and can be "rolled up" to be carried in my motorcycle jacket or computer bag without getting crunched. They are very light and do not feel heavy or bear down on your ears even after listening to music with them on all day. The sound is night and day better than any ear-bud could be and are almost as good as the Pro 4AA. They are "open air" headphones so you cannot match the bass to the sealed types, but it comes close. For $32, you cannot go wrong.

How is the bass?

The Koss Portapro is portable AND has great bass response .

I have had Koss headphones in the past, Pro 4AA and QZ-99. The Koss Portapro is portable AND has great bass response. The work great with my Android phone and can be "rolled up" to be carried in my motorcycle jacket or computer bag without getting crunched. They are very light and do not feel heavy or bear down on your ears even after listening to music with them on all day. The sound is night and day better than any ear-bud could be and are almost as good as the Pro 4AA. They are "open air" headphones so you cannot match the bass to the sealed types, but it comes close. For $32, you cannot go wrong.

The Koss Portapro is portable AND <hl> has great bass response <hl> .

I have had Koss headphones in the past, Pro 4AA and QZ-99. The Koss Portapro is portable AND <hl> has great bass response <hl>. The work great with my Android phone and can be "rolled up" to be carried in my motorcycle jacket or computer bag without getting crunched. They are very light and do not feel heavy or bear down on your ears even after listening to music with them on all day. The sound is night and day better than any ear-bud could be and are almost as good as the Pro 4AA. They are "open air" headphones so you cannot match the bass to the sealed types, but it comes close. For $32, you cannot go wrong.

I have had Koss headphones in the past, Pro 4AA and QZ-99. <hl> The Koss Portapro is portable AND has great bass response . <hl> The work great with my Android phone and can be "rolled up" to be carried in my motorcycle jacket or computer bag without getting crunched. They are very light and do not feel heavy or bear down on your ears even after listening to music with them on all day. The sound is night and day better than any ear-bud could be and are almost as good as the Pro 4AA. They are "open air" headphones so you cannot match the bass to the sealed types, but it comes close. For $32, you cannot go wrong.

882b1e2745a4779c8f17b3d4406b91c7

electronics

These Earbuds have very good sound

question: How is the earphone?, context: These Earbuds have very good sound, they're cheap, and colorful. The sound is VERY clear, from the bass, the mids, and the high treble. The sound isolation is great: i can't hear my parents yelling at me, which is really saying something. These are just plain awesome. I'm thinking about buying a pair of headphones from Skullcandy too. Like any earbuds, you should take care of them. I have friends that say Skullcandy sucks, i don't agree because these are amazing.

How is the earphone?

These Earbuds have very good sound , they're cheap, and colorful.

These Earbuds have very good sound, they're cheap, and colorful. The sound is VERY clear, from the bass, the mids, and the high treble. The sound isolation is great: i can't hear my parents yelling at me, which is really saying something. These are just plain awesome. I'm thinking about buying a pair of headphones from Skullcandy too. Like any earbuds, you should take care of them. I have friends that say Skullcandy sucks, i don't agree because these are amazing.

<hl> These Earbuds have very good sound <hl> , they're cheap, and colorful.

<hl> These Earbuds have very good sound <hl>, they're cheap, and colorful. The sound is VERY clear, from the bass, the mids, and the high treble. The sound isolation is great: i can't hear my parents yelling at me, which is really saying something. These are just plain awesome. I'm thinking about buying a pair of headphones from Skullcandy too. Like any earbuds, you should take care of them. I have friends that say Skullcandy sucks, i don't agree because these are amazing.

<hl> These Earbuds have very good sound , they're cheap, and colorful. <hl> The sound is VERY clear, from the bass, the mids, and the high treble. The sound isolation is great: i can't hear my parents yelling at me, which is really saying something. These are just plain awesome. I'm thinking about buying a pair of headphones from Skullcandy too. Like any earbuds, you should take care of them. I have friends that say Skullcandy sucks, i don't agree because these are amazing.

306e24b06c834ef758cd74e5ee6ce360

electronics

hard to keep in place

question: Is a stiff cover?, context: PRO:* protects my tablet* easy to put the tablet in the case* magnets activate/deactivate tablet correctly* buttons, ports, and speakers are not blockedCON:* the multi-fold cover is sometimes hard to keep in place when reading one-handed* the angle of the stand is not acute enough for actual usage (though it's good for watching videos)

Is a stiff cover?

the multi-fold cover is sometimes hard to keep in place when reading one-handed* the angle of the stand is not acute enough for actual usage (though it's good for watching videos)

PRO:* protects my tablet* easy to put the tablet in the case* magnets activate/deactivate tablet correctly* buttons, ports, and speakers are not blockedCON:* the multi-fold cover is sometimes hard to keep in place when reading one-handed* the angle of the stand is not acute enough for actual usage (though it's good for watching videos)

the multi-fold cover is sometimes <hl> hard to keep in place <hl> when reading one-handed* the angle of the stand is not acute enough for actual usage (though it's good for watching videos)

PRO:* protects my tablet* easy to put the tablet in the case* magnets activate/deactivate tablet correctly* buttons, ports, and speakers are not blockedCON:* the multi-fold cover is sometimes <hl> hard to keep in place <hl> when reading one-handed* the angle of the stand is not acute enough for actual usage (though it's good for watching videos)

PRO:* protects my tablet* easy to put the tablet in the case* magnets activate/deactivate tablet correctly* buttons, ports, and speakers are not blockedCON:* <hl> the multi-fold cover is sometimes hard to keep in place when reading one-handed* the angle of the stand is not acute enough for actual usage (though it's good for watching videos) <hl>

c9f6d884812adfe6db5fb158b7c5917e

electronics

is the build quality is better on the 1.4

question: How is the build of the canon t1i and kit lenses?, context: I bough this lens for a relative who bought my old canon rebel xti from me (at a great price). Since she is pregnant with her 5th kid, I recommended this budget lens as an all-purpose affordable lens that gives a lot of bang for the buck. Personally, i shoot with the 50mm 1.4 which I love, but this does the trick, especially on a 1.6x body like the rebel xti. Anyone learning photography is wise to get a prime lens and learn to frame shots by moving around. Some say zoom lenses make people lazy. By moving around you can actually find better angles and shots than if you could just adjust a zoom. Sure, zooms are great, but prime's are both cheaper and better, and make better photographers, especially for someone just starting out with a dslr on a budget. The main difference to the 1.4 is the build quality is better on the 1.4 and the bokeh is smoother, not to mention a lower f-stop means lower light shooting without cranking up the ISO but not by much. This is perfectly adequate and for $104 on amazon, a no brainer.

How is the build of the canon t1i and kit lenses?

The main difference to the 1.4 is the build quality is better on the 1.4 and the bokeh is smoother, not to mention a lower f-stop means lower light shooting without cranking up the ISO but not by much.

I bough this lens for a relative who bought my old canon rebel xti from me (at a great price). Since she is pregnant with her 5th kid, I recommended this budget lens as an all-purpose affordable lens that gives a lot of bang for the buck. Personally, i shoot with the 50mm 1.4 which I love, but this does the trick, especially on a 1.6x body like the rebel xti. Anyone learning photography is wise to get a prime lens and learn to frame shots by moving around. Some say zoom lenses make people lazy. By moving around you can actually find better angles and shots than if you could just adjust a zoom. Sure, zooms are great, but prime's are both cheaper and better, and make better photographers, especially for someone just starting out with a dslr on a budget. The main difference to the 1.4 is the build quality is better on the 1.4 and the bokeh is smoother, not to mention a lower f-stop means lower light shooting without cranking up the ISO but not by much. This is perfectly adequate and for $104 on amazon, a no brainer.

The main difference to the 1.4 <hl> is the build quality is better on the 1.4 <hl> and the bokeh is smoother, not to mention a lower f-stop means lower light shooting without cranking up the ISO but not by much.

I bough this lens for a relative who bought my old canon rebel xti from me (at a great price). Since she is pregnant with her 5th kid, I recommended this budget lens as an all-purpose affordable lens that gives a lot of bang for the buck. Personally, i shoot with the 50mm 1.4 which I love, but this does the trick, especially on a 1.6x body like the rebel xti. Anyone learning photography is wise to get a prime lens and learn to frame shots by moving around. Some say zoom lenses make people lazy. By moving around you can actually find better angles and shots than if you could just adjust a zoom. Sure, zooms are great, but prime's are both cheaper and better, and make better photographers, especially for someone just starting out with a dslr on a budget. The main difference to the 1.4 <hl> is the build quality is better on the 1.4 <hl> and the bokeh is smoother, not to mention a lower f-stop means lower light shooting without cranking up the ISO but not by much. This is perfectly adequate and for $104 on amazon, a no brainer.

I bough this lens for a relative who bought my old canon rebel xti from me (at a great price). Since she is pregnant with her 5th kid, I recommended this budget lens as an all-purpose affordable lens that gives a lot of bang for the buck. Personally, i shoot with the 50mm 1.4 which I love, but this does the trick, especially on a 1.6x body like the rebel xti. Anyone learning photography is wise to get a prime lens and learn to frame shots by moving around. Some say zoom lenses make people lazy. By moving around you can actually find better angles and shots than if you could just adjust a zoom. Sure, zooms are great, but prime's are both cheaper and better, and make better photographers, especially for someone just starting out with a dslr on a budget. <hl> The main difference to the 1.4 is the build quality is better on the 1.4 and the bokeh is smoother, not to mention a lower f-stop means lower light shooting without cranking up the ISO but not by much. <hl> This is perfectly adequate and for $104 on amazon, a no brainer.

a1f6e39766a79f1475b3dbe07e517e04

electronics

Since

question: How time does the battery last?, context: Kindle Fire HD 7"Having been an Android and iOS user for the past few years (iPod Touch, iPhone, Motorola Droid2, Samsung Galaxy S3, Kindle Touch, Motorola MotoACTV), I've been anxious to try a Kindle Fire. Going in, I knew it wouldn't be a pure Android ecosystem nor would it have the latest in hardware. I looked at the Google Nexus 7 (Asus) and a Google Nexus 10 as well as the Asus Transformer tablets. The positive aspects of those tablets mainly focus on the Android operating system. Since I'm a fairly heavy consumer of Amazon products and services, the Kindle Fire HD (KFHD) isn't a bad choice.It's easy to navigate, although the Carousel is rather annoying than useful. I prefer Android Ice Cream Sandwich or Jelly Bean as it allows far more flexibility and customization. That said, KFHD 7.2.3 is actually based on Android Ice Cream Sandwich, according to Antutu Benchmarks.The Silk Web Browser works much like any other Android browser, and the Kindle Fire integrates seamlessly with your Amazon Cloud services (books, music, movies, etc...) As a Prime member, I can also watch Prime movies in HD. For some unknown reason, Amazon does not allow Prime movies to be played in HD if using a PC - only devices such as the Roku, PS3, Xbox 360, and Kindle Fire allow playback in HD.The KFHD has a micro-USB and micro-HDMI port, with 3 buttons on the side for volume and power. I have a Belkin Chambray case that I first used, but it made the KFHD look and feel cheap. There are lots of cases on the market that use straps to hold the KFHD in place, and then another elastic strap to keep the cover in place. That just looks and feels cheesy. I opted to buy the Amazon KFHD leather case that uses the magnetic closure system. It is perfect! The magnetic flap is exactly what I was looking for! In addition, the buttons work perfectly through the case.The experience of watching a movie on the 7" screen isn't that great. I prefer watching movies on a larger TV. I also found that reading a book on the KFHD hurt my eyes almost immediately. The lighter background on a LCD causes more strain than the e-ink/pearl screen on the Kindle Touch/Paperwhite. So essentially the KFHD is really more useful for reading magazines, browsing the web, playing games, and perhaps watching a movie/listening to music on the go.The KFDH 7" has a dual-core 1.2 GHz processor with only 1GB of RAM. I can detect that it is slower than my Samsung Galaxy S3 (1.5 GHz dual-core with 2GB RAM), as it scores only about 6,500 points in Antutu while my Galaxy S3 is at 11,000 points. The screen on the KFHD is crisp. I am able to read magazines using Zinio. In the full page view, the text can be too small although it is good enough for me to skim to find interesting articles.Speaking of Zinio, the Amazon Appstore is probably the sorriest excuse for a marketplace that I've seen. Google Play has far more updated apps. The same apps in the Amazon Appstore are sometimes outdated by several generations, or they simply aren't in the Appstore. I had to sideload Zinio onto my KFHD.I opted to use a regular USB charger, and it takes awhile to fully charge the battery. However, in standby mode it sips power. Another good aspect with the Amazon Onyx case is that the magnetic closure puts the Kindle to sleep (or rather turns off the screen) when the cover is closed without having to do anything else. The battery life is acceptable - the screen is what uses the most power.Overall: 4/5 stars. I have to admit that it is overpriced for what it is, there are better Android-powered tablets (Nexus 7) at the same price point with more hardware power. The Amazon Appstore is sorely lacking compared to Google Play. The 1.2 GHz processor is fairly slow, and there's only 1 GB RAM. The lack of a SD card slot is also a mistake. If you want to read magazines without ever having to zoom in, the KFHD 8.9" or a 10" tablet is the answer, but I felt the 7" is suitable because it is smaller, lighter, and easier to handle.Bottom line is that if you're interested primarily in Amazon content, the Kindle Fire HD is for you. The 8.9" is best for reading magazines but the 7" suits me fine. If you plan to root the KFHD, you're better off just buying an Android Tablet like the Nexus 7. The Nexus 7 and other tablets have better hardware (more RAM, faster processor, SD card slot, etc...)

How time does the battery last?

Since I'm a fairly heavy consumer of Amazon products and services, the Kindle Fire HD (KFHD) isn't a bad choice.

Kindle Fire HD 7"Having been an Android and iOS user for the past few years (iPod Touch, iPhone, Motorola Droid2, Samsung Galaxy S3, Kindle Touch, Motorola MotoACTV), I've been anxious to try a Kindle Fire. Going in, I knew it wouldn't be a pure Android ecosystem nor would it have the latest in hardware. I looked at the Google Nexus 7 (Asus) and a Google Nexus 10 as well as the Asus Transformer tablets. The positive aspects of those tablets mainly focus on the Android operating system. Since I'm a fairly heavy consumer of Amazon products and services, the Kindle Fire HD (KFHD) isn't a bad choice.It's easy to navigate, although the Carousel is rather annoying than useful. I prefer Android Ice Cream Sandwich or Jelly Bean as it allows far more flexibility and customization. That said, KFHD 7.2.3 is actually based on Android Ice Cream Sandwich, according to Antutu Benchmarks.The Silk Web Browser works much like any other Android browser, and the Kindle Fire integrates seamlessly with your Amazon Cloud services (books, music, movies, etc...) As a Prime member, I can also watch Prime movies in HD. For some unknown reason, Amazon does not allow Prime movies to be played in HD if using a PC - only devices such as the Roku, PS3, Xbox 360, and Kindle Fire allow playback in HD.The KFHD has a micro-USB and micro-HDMI port, with 3 buttons on the side for volume and power. I have a Belkin Chambray case that I first used, but it made the KFHD look and feel cheap. There are lots of cases on the market that use straps to hold the KFHD in place, and then another elastic strap to keep the cover in place. That just looks and feels cheesy. I opted to buy the Amazon KFHD leather case that uses the magnetic closure system. It is perfect! The magnetic flap is exactly what I was looking for! In addition, the buttons work perfectly through the case.The experience of watching a movie on the 7" screen isn't that great. I prefer watching movies on a larger TV. I also found that reading a book on the KFHD hurt my eyes almost immediately. The lighter background on a LCD causes more strain than the e-ink/pearl screen on the Kindle Touch/Paperwhite. So essentially the KFHD is really more useful for reading magazines, browsing the web, playing games, and perhaps watching a movie/listening to music on the go.The KFDH 7" has a dual-core 1.2 GHz processor with only 1GB of RAM. I can detect that it is slower than my Samsung Galaxy S3 (1.5 GHz dual-core with 2GB RAM), as it scores only about 6,500 points in Antutu while my Galaxy S3 is at 11,000 points. The screen on the KFHD is crisp. I am able to read magazines using Zinio. In the full page view, the text can be too small although it is good enough for me to skim to find interesting articles.Speaking of Zinio, the Amazon Appstore is probably the sorriest excuse for a marketplace that I've seen. Google Play has far more updated apps. The same apps in the Amazon Appstore are sometimes outdated by several generations, or they simply aren't in the Appstore. I had to sideload Zinio onto my KFHD.I opted to use a regular USB charger, and it takes awhile to fully charge the battery. However, in standby mode it sips power. Another good aspect with the Amazon Onyx case is that the magnetic closure puts the Kindle to sleep (or rather turns off the screen) when the cover is closed without having to do anything else. The battery life is acceptable - the screen is what uses the most power.Overall: 4/5 stars. I have to admit that it is overpriced for what it is, there are better Android-powered tablets (Nexus 7) at the same price point with more hardware power. The Amazon Appstore is sorely lacking compared to Google Play. The 1.2 GHz processor is fairly slow, and there's only 1 GB RAM. The lack of a SD card slot is also a mistake. If you want to read magazines without ever having to zoom in, the KFHD 8.9" or a 10" tablet is the answer, but I felt the 7" is suitable because it is smaller, lighter, and easier to handle.Bottom line is that if you're interested primarily in Amazon content, the Kindle Fire HD is for you. The 8.9" is best for reading magazines but the 7" suits me fine. If you plan to root the KFHD, you're better off just buying an Android Tablet like the Nexus 7. The Nexus 7 and other tablets have better hardware (more RAM, faster processor, SD card slot, etc...)

<hl> Since <hl> I'm a fairly heavy consumer of Amazon products and services, the Kindle Fire HD (KFHD) isn't a bad choice.

Kindle Fire HD 7"Having been an Android and iOS user for the past few years (iPod Touch, iPhone, Motorola Droid2, Samsung Galaxy S3, Kindle Touch, Motorola MotoACTV), I've been anxious to try a Kindle Fire. Going in, I knew it wouldn't be a pure Android ecosystem nor would it have the latest in hardware. I looked at the Google Nexus 7 (Asus) and a Google Nexus 10 as well as the Asus Transformer tablets. The positive aspects of those tablets mainly focus on the Android operating system. <hl> Since <hl> I'm a fairly heavy consumer of Amazon products and services, the Kindle Fire HD (KFHD) isn't a bad choice.It's easy to navigate, although the Carousel is rather annoying than useful. I prefer Android Ice Cream Sandwich or Jelly Bean as it allows far more flexibility and customization. That said, KFHD 7.2.3 is actually based on Android Ice Cream Sandwich, according to Antutu Benchmarks.The Silk Web Browser works much like any other Android browser, and the Kindle Fire integrates seamlessly with your Amazon Cloud services (books, music, movies, etc...) As a Prime member, I can also watch Prime movies in HD. For some unknown reason, Amazon does not allow Prime movies to be played in HD if using a PC - only devices such as the Roku, PS3, Xbox 360, and Kindle Fire allow playback in HD.The KFHD has a micro-USB and micro-HDMI port, with 3 buttons on the side for volume and power. I have a Belkin Chambray case that I first used, but it made the KFHD look and feel cheap. There are lots of cases on the market that use straps to hold the KFHD in place, and then another elastic strap to keep the cover in place. That just looks and feels cheesy. I opted to buy the Amazon KFHD leather case that uses the magnetic closure system. It is perfect! The magnetic flap is exactly what I was looking for! In addition, the buttons work perfectly through the case.The experience of watching a movie on the 7" screen isn't that great. I prefer watching movies on a larger TV. I also found that reading a book on the KFHD hurt my eyes almost immediately. The lighter background on a LCD causes more strain than the e-ink/pearl screen on the Kindle Touch/Paperwhite. So essentially the KFHD is really more useful for reading magazines, browsing the web, playing games, and perhaps watching a movie/listening to music on the go.The KFDH 7" has a dual-core 1.2 GHz processor with only 1GB of RAM. I can detect that it is slower than my Samsung Galaxy S3 (1.5 GHz dual-core with 2GB RAM), as it scores only about 6,500 points in Antutu while my Galaxy S3 is at 11,000 points. The screen on the KFHD is crisp. I am able to read magazines using Zinio. In the full page view, the text can be too small although it is good enough for me to skim to find interesting articles.Speaking of Zinio, the Amazon Appstore is probably the sorriest excuse for a marketplace that I've seen. Google Play has far more updated apps. The same apps in the Amazon Appstore are sometimes outdated by several generations, or they simply aren't in the Appstore. I had to sideload Zinio onto my KFHD.I opted to use a regular USB charger, and it takes awhile to fully charge the battery. However, in standby mode it sips power. Another good aspect with the Amazon Onyx case is that the magnetic closure puts the Kindle to sleep (or rather turns off the screen) when the cover is closed without having to do anything else. The battery life is acceptable - the screen is what uses the most power.Overall: 4/5 stars. I have to admit that it is overpriced for what it is, there are better Android-powered tablets (Nexus 7) at the same price point with more hardware power. The Amazon Appstore is sorely lacking compared to Google Play. The 1.2 GHz processor is fairly slow, and there's only 1 GB RAM. The lack of a SD card slot is also a mistake. If you want to read magazines without ever having to zoom in, the KFHD 8.9" or a 10" tablet is the answer, but I felt the 7" is suitable because it is smaller, lighter, and easier to handle.Bottom line is that if you're interested primarily in Amazon content, the Kindle Fire HD is for you. The 8.9" is best for reading magazines but the 7" suits me fine. If you plan to root the KFHD, you're better off just buying an Android Tablet like the Nexus 7. The Nexus 7 and other tablets have better hardware (more RAM, faster processor, SD card slot, etc...)

Kindle Fire HD 7"Having been an Android and iOS user for the past few years (iPod Touch, iPhone, Motorola Droid2, Samsung Galaxy S3, Kindle Touch, Motorola MotoACTV), I've been anxious to try a Kindle Fire. Going in, I knew it wouldn't be a pure Android ecosystem nor would it have the latest in hardware. I looked at the Google Nexus 7 (Asus) and a Google Nexus 10 as well as the Asus Transformer tablets. The positive aspects of those tablets mainly focus on the Android operating system. <hl> Since I'm a fairly heavy consumer of Amazon products and services, the Kindle Fire HD (KFHD) isn't a bad choice. <hl> It's easy to navigate, although the Carousel is rather annoying than useful. I prefer Android Ice Cream Sandwich or Jelly Bean as it allows far more flexibility and customization. That said, KFHD 7.2.3 is actually based on Android Ice Cream Sandwich, according to Antutu Benchmarks. The Silk Web Browser works much like any other Android browser, and the Kindle Fire integrates seamlessly with your Amazon Cloud services (books, music, movies, etc...) As a Prime member, I can also watch Prime movies in HD. For some unknown reason, Amazon does not allow Prime movies to be played in HD if using a PC - only devices such as the Roku, PS3, Xbox 360, and Kindle Fire allow playback in HD.The KFHD has a micro-USB and micro-HDMI port, with 3 buttons on the side for volume and power. I have a Belkin Chambray case that I first used, but it made the KFHD look and feel cheap. There are lots of cases on the market that use straps to hold the KFHD in place, and then another elastic strap to keep the cover in place. That just looks and feels cheesy. I opted to buy the Amazon KFHD leather case that uses the magnetic closure system. It is perfect! The magnetic flap is exactly what I was looking for! In addition, the buttons work perfectly through the case. The experience of watching a movie on the 7" screen isn't that great. I prefer watching movies on a larger TV. I also found that reading a book on the KFHD hurt my eyes almost immediately. The lighter background on a LCD causes more strain than the e-ink/pearl screen on the Kindle Touch/Paperwhite. So essentially the KFHD is really more useful for reading magazines, browsing the web, playing games, and perhaps watching a movie/listening to music on the go. The KFDH 7" has a dual-core 1.2 GHz processor with only 1GB of RAM. I can detect that it is slower than my Samsung Galaxy S3 (1.5 GHz dual-core with 2GB RAM), as it scores only about 6,500 points in Antutu while my Galaxy S3 is at 11,000 points. The screen on the KFHD is crisp. I am able to read magazines using Zinio. In the full page view, the text can be too small although it is good enough for me to skim to find interesting articles. Speaking of Zinio, the Amazon Appstore is probably the sorriest excuse for a marketplace that I've seen. Google Play has far more updated apps. The same apps in the Amazon Appstore are sometimes outdated by several generations, or they simply aren't in the Appstore. I had to sideload Zinio onto my KFHD.I opted to use a regular USB charger, and it takes awhile to fully charge the battery. However, in standby mode it sips power. Another good aspect with the Amazon Onyx case is that the magnetic closure puts the Kindle to sleep (or rather turns off the screen) when the cover is closed without having to do anything else. The battery life is acceptable - the screen is what uses the most power. Overall: 4/5 stars. I have to admit that it is overpriced for what it is, there are better Android-powered tablets (Nexus 7) at the same price point with more hardware power. The Amazon Appstore is sorely lacking compared to Google Play. The 1.2 GHz processor is fairly slow, and there's only 1 GB RAM. The lack of a SD card slot is also a mistake. If you want to read magazines without ever having to zoom in, the KFHD 8.9" or a 10" tablet is the answer, but I felt the 7" is suitable because it is smaller, lighter, and easier to handle. Bottom line is that if you're interested primarily in Amazon content, the Kindle Fire HD is for you. The 8.9" is best for reading magazines but the 7" suits me fine. If you plan to root the KFHD, you're better off just buying an Android Tablet like the Nexus 7. The Nexus 7 and other tablets have better hardware (more RAM, faster processor, SD card slot, etc...)

fc5d44724351d3e83dc2fb22ae0611ea

electronics

Allows me thousands of pictures

question: How is the capacity?, context: I use this card in my Canon Camera and it works as advertised. Allows me thousands of pictures, and the transfer to my computers is quite fast.

How is the capacity?

Allows me thousands of pictures , and the transfer to my computers is quite fast.

I use this card in my Canon Camera and it works as advertised. Allows me thousands of pictures, and the transfer to my computers is quite fast.

<hl> Allows me thousands of pictures <hl> , and the transfer to my computers is quite fast.

I use this card in my Canon Camera and it works as advertised. <hl> Allows me thousands of pictures <hl>, and the transfer to my computers is quite fast.

I use this card in my Canon Camera and it works as advertised. <hl> Allows me thousands of pictures , and the transfer to my computers is quite fast. <hl>

4c49fb7112e85e615c7cbec364f7bb57

electronics

connected the transmitter to my laptop audio output jack

question: How can I raise the volume to the music?, context: I was looking for a wireless headset for quite sometime now, was not sure which one to buy, as most of the reviews of all the wireless headsets were not encouraging. However, I decided to try RS-120 and got them from Amazon.There is no user manual as such with the item. There are 3 or 4 loose sheets with different types of instructions which are not very descriptive.I connected the transmitter to a wall socket and charged the headset for about 3 hours. I was not sure where to connect the RCA cable, as there were many holes on my LCD HD TV, and no headphone jack. I connected the RCA cable to back of my TV where it said "Audio Out - Line". The transmitter light (green) did not turn on. There was some hiss in the headphone. I changed transmitter band and tried to tune headphone. Still no sound, but just hiss. I was bit nervous. Since I was not sure about TV RCA connection, connected the transmitter to my laptop audio output jack, using the supplied RCA-audio jack adapter (very nice accessory). The green light came on, and it worked!Then I connected the transmitter back to the TV to the same RCA holes, and this time it worked! Good thing about this is the TV volume can be on or muted.The sound quality is absolutely great, clear and stereo. The headphones are light and comfortable for continuous use. I have not yet checked the battery life or the range. But the headphones work clearly in all the rooms in my house.

How can I raise the volume to the music?

Since I was not sure about TV RCA connection, connected the transmitter to my laptop audio output jack , using the supplied RCA-audio jack adapter (very nice accessory).

I was looking for a wireless headset for quite sometime now, was not sure which one to buy, as most of the reviews of all the wireless headsets were not encouraging. However, I decided to try RS-120 and got them from Amazon.There is no user manual as such with the item. There are 3 or 4 loose sheets with different types of instructions which are not very descriptive.I connected the transmitter to a wall socket and charged the headset for about 3 hours. I was not sure where to connect the RCA cable, as there were many holes on my LCD HD TV, and no headphone jack. I connected the RCA cable to back of my TV where it said "Audio Out - Line". The transmitter light (green) did not turn on. There was some hiss in the headphone. I changed transmitter band and tried to tune headphone. Still no sound, but just hiss. I was bit nervous. Since I was not sure about TV RCA connection, connected the transmitter to my laptop audio output jack, using the supplied RCA-audio jack adapter (very nice accessory). The green light came on, and it worked!Then I connected the transmitter back to the TV to the same RCA holes, and this time it worked! Good thing about this is the TV volume can be on or muted.The sound quality is absolutely great, clear and stereo. The headphones are light and comfortable for continuous use. I have not yet checked the battery life or the range. But the headphones work clearly in all the rooms in my house.

Since I was not sure about TV RCA connection, <hl> connected the transmitter to my laptop audio output jack <hl> , using the supplied RCA-audio jack adapter (very nice accessory).

I was looking for a wireless headset for quite sometime now, was not sure which one to buy, as most of the reviews of all the wireless headsets were not encouraging. However, I decided to try RS-120 and got them from Amazon.There is no user manual as such with the item. There are 3 or 4 loose sheets with different types of instructions which are not very descriptive.I connected the transmitter to a wall socket and charged the headset for about 3 hours. I was not sure where to connect the RCA cable, as there were many holes on my LCD HD TV, and no headphone jack. I connected the RCA cable to back of my TV where it said "Audio Out - Line". The transmitter light (green) did not turn on. There was some hiss in the headphone. I changed transmitter band and tried to tune headphone. Still no sound, but just hiss. I was bit nervous. Since I was not sure about TV RCA connection, <hl> connected the transmitter to my laptop audio output jack <hl>, using the supplied RCA-audio jack adapter (very nice accessory). The green light came on, and it worked!Then I connected the transmitter back to the TV to the same RCA holes, and this time it worked! Good thing about this is the TV volume can be on or muted.The sound quality is absolutely great, clear and stereo. The headphones are light and comfortable for continuous use. I have not yet checked the battery life or the range. But the headphones work clearly in all the rooms in my house.

I was looking for a wireless headset for quite sometime now, was not sure which one to buy, as most of the reviews of all the wireless headsets were not encouraging. However, I decided to try RS-120 and got them from Amazon. There is no user manual as such with the item. There are 3 or 4 loose sheets with different types of instructions which are not very descriptive. I connected the transmitter to a wall socket and charged the headset for about 3 hours. I was not sure where to connect the RCA cable, as there were many holes on my LCD HD TV, and no headphone jack. I connected the RCA cable to back of my TV where it said "Audio Out - Line". The transmitter light (green) did not turn on. There was some hiss in the headphone. I changed transmitter band and tried to tune headphone. Still no sound, but just hiss. I was bit nervous. <hl> Since I was not sure about TV RCA connection, connected the transmitter to my laptop audio output jack , using the supplied RCA-audio jack adapter (very nice accessory). <hl> The green light came on, and it worked!Then I connected the transmitter back to the TV to the same RCA holes, and this time it worked! Good thing about this is the TV volume can be on or muted. The sound quality is absolutely great, clear and stereo. The headphones are light and comfortable for continuous use. I have not yet checked the battery life or the range. But the headphones work clearly in all the rooms in my house.

f113ffa174e8ebdc64cdff8291395d14

electronics

this keyboard is compact

question: Does the keyboard lightweight?, context: I really like this keyboard. I give it 4 stars because it doesn't have a CAPS LOCK key so I never know if my caps are on. But for the price, it really suffices as a wireless keyboard. I have very large hands and this keyboard is compact, but I have no complaints.

Does the keyboard lightweight?

I have very large hands and this keyboard is compact , but I have no complaints.

I really like this keyboard. I give it 4 stars because it doesn't have a CAPS LOCK key so I never know if my caps are on. But for the price, it really suffices as a wireless keyboard. I have very large hands and this keyboard is compact, but I have no complaints.

I have very large hands and <hl> this keyboard is compact <hl> , but I have no complaints.

I really like this keyboard. I give it 4 stars because it doesn't have a CAPS LOCK key so I never know if my caps are on. But for the price, it really suffices as a wireless keyboard. I have very large hands and <hl> this keyboard is compact <hl>, but I have no complaints.

I really like this keyboard. I give it 4 stars because it doesn't have a CAPS LOCK key so I never know if my caps are on. But for the price, it really suffices as a wireless keyboard. <hl> I have very large hands and this keyboard is compact , but I have no complaints. <hl>

ee7edb918297bf702f1a1691418727ff

electronics

I'm using this in combination with a short extension cable

question: How was the power supply?, context: I have two of these on two different computers, and they've both been working fine. (This is the AmazonBasics USB 2.0 4-Port Ultra Mini Hub, since Amazon might lump reviews for all products on this page together.) The included USB cable is very short, which is fine for one of my computers, but on another I'm using this in combination with a short extension cable to help it reach my desk, where I want it. The short cable may be nice in some situations. All ports work as expected. This is is not a powered hub (except via the bus), so don't expect to charge an iPad on it, but it still works for my smaller devices (e.g., Kindle).The only thing I don't like is that the LED on the top is rather bright and is lit up whenever this hub is connected. I've covered mine with black tape to get rid of this. I wouldn't mind if it were less bright.

How was the power supply?

The included USB cable is very short, which is fine for one of my computers, but on another I'm using this in combination with a short extension cable to help it reach my desk, where I want it.

I have two of these on two different computers, and they've both been working fine. (This is the AmazonBasics USB 2.0 4-Port Ultra Mini Hub, since Amazon might lump reviews for all products on this page together.) The included USB cable is very short, which is fine for one of my computers, but on another I'm using this in combination with a short extension cable to help it reach my desk, where I want it. The short cable may be nice in some situations. All ports work as expected. This is is not a powered hub (except via the bus), so don't expect to charge an iPad on it, but it still works for my smaller devices (e.g., Kindle).The only thing I don't like is that the LED on the top is rather bright and is lit up whenever this hub is connected. I've covered mine with black tape to get rid of this. I wouldn't mind if it were less bright.

The included USB cable is very short, which is fine for one of my computers, but on another <hl> I'm using this in combination with a short extension cable <hl> to help it reach my desk, where I want it.

I have two of these on two different computers, and they've both been working fine. (This is the AmazonBasics USB 2.0 4-Port Ultra Mini Hub, since Amazon might lump reviews for all products on this page together.) The included USB cable is very short, which is fine for one of my computers, but on another <hl> I'm using this in combination with a short extension cable <hl> to help it reach my desk, where I want it. The short cable may be nice in some situations. All ports work as expected. This is is not a powered hub (except via the bus), so don't expect to charge an iPad on it, but it still works for my smaller devices (e.g., Kindle).The only thing I don't like is that the LED on the top is rather bright and is lit up whenever this hub is connected. I've covered mine with black tape to get rid of this. I wouldn't mind if it were less bright.

I have two of these on two different computers, and they've both been working fine. (This is the AmazonBasics USB 2.0 4-Port Ultra Mini Hub, since Amazon might lump reviews for all products on this page together.) <hl> The included USB cable is very short, which is fine for one of my computers, but on another I'm using this in combination with a short extension cable to help it reach my desk, where I want it. <hl> The short cable may be nice in some situations. All ports work as expected. This is is not a powered hub (except via the bus), so don't expect to charge an iPad on it, but it still works for my smaller devices (e.g., Kindle).The only thing I don't like is that the LED on the top is rather bright and is lit up whenever this hub is connected. I've covered mine with black tape to get rid of this. I wouldn't mind if it were less bright.

b6a24099742b68a41c42e9160d4e6137

electronics

only have to charge it every other day

question: How is the charge?, context: This headset is incredibly useful. I purchased it to be able to listen to various audio streams throughout the day at my desk, while mowing the lawn, while working on projects, and performing other tasks. My only complaint about it is that if I have multiple devices which have been connected to it, it proves very difficult to select which device is connected. It also will split connection between various devices, one for phone audio, another for media audio. I have other bluetooth devices which will accept both inputs from multiple sources simultaneously. That feature would be the best possible improvement for this unit.Other than that issue (which is a derivative of my usage of it) it meets or exceeds my expectations. Battery life is quite reasonable, I use it for several hours every day, and only have to charge it every other day. Once it's on my neck, I quickly forget that it's there. From a comfort perspective, it could due to be slightly longer from end to end, as my neck is significantly larger than the average, but it isn't a problem for me at the length that it is.

How is the charge?

Battery life is quite reasonable, I use it for several hours every day, and only have to charge it every other day .

This headset is incredibly useful. I purchased it to be able to listen to various audio streams throughout the day at my desk, while mowing the lawn, while working on projects, and performing other tasks. My only complaint about it is that if I have multiple devices which have been connected to it, it proves very difficult to select which device is connected. It also will split connection between various devices, one for phone audio, another for media audio. I have other bluetooth devices which will accept both inputs from multiple sources simultaneously. That feature would be the best possible improvement for this unit.Other than that issue (which is a derivative of my usage of it) it meets or exceeds my expectations. Battery life is quite reasonable, I use it for several hours every day, and only have to charge it every other day. Once it's on my neck, I quickly forget that it's there. From a comfort perspective, it could due to be slightly longer from end to end, as my neck is significantly larger than the average, but it isn't a problem for me at the length that it is.

Battery life is quite reasonable, I use it for several hours every day, and <hl> only have to charge it every other day <hl> .

This headset is incredibly useful. I purchased it to be able to listen to various audio streams throughout the day at my desk, while mowing the lawn, while working on projects, and performing other tasks. My only complaint about it is that if I have multiple devices which have been connected to it, it proves very difficult to select which device is connected. It also will split connection between various devices, one for phone audio, another for media audio. I have other bluetooth devices which will accept both inputs from multiple sources simultaneously. That feature would be the best possible improvement for this unit.Other than that issue (which is a derivative of my usage of it) it meets or exceeds my expectations. Battery life is quite reasonable, I use it for several hours every day, and <hl> only have to charge it every other day <hl>. Once it's on my neck, I quickly forget that it's there. From a comfort perspective, it could due to be slightly longer from end to end, as my neck is significantly larger than the average, but it isn't a problem for me at the length that it is.

This headset is incredibly useful. I purchased it to be able to listen to various audio streams throughout the day at my desk, while mowing the lawn, while working on projects, and performing other tasks. My only complaint about it is that if I have multiple devices which have been connected to it, it proves very difficult to select which device is connected. It also will split connection between various devices, one for phone audio, another for media audio. I have other bluetooth devices which will accept both inputs from multiple sources simultaneously. That feature would be the best possible improvement for this unit. Other than that issue (which is a derivative of my usage of it) it meets or exceeds my expectations. <hl> Battery life is quite reasonable, I use it for several hours every day, and only have to charge it every other day . <hl> Once it's on my neck, I quickly forget that it's there. From a comfort perspective, it could due to be slightly longer from end to end, as my neck is significantly larger than the average, but it isn't a problem for me at the length that it is.

586ec35539a02e450f7f4ec54d73926f

electronics

the cover seems cheaply made

question: How elastic is this band?, context: I don't think the cover seems cheaply made, nor have I had any trouble with the Fire falling over (I've used the stand only in the landscape orientation). I like the sleep/wake function built into the cover, the leather looks good, it adds very little weight to the Fire, there's no chemical smell, and the fit is snug without resorting to the use of corner straps or having to slip the Fire into a holder that covers the bezel. I like the cover so much I'm thinking of buying a second one in another color.

How elastic is this band?

I don't think the cover seems cheaply made , nor have I had any trouble with the Fire falling over (I've used the stand only in the landscape orientation).

I don't think the cover seems cheaply made, nor have I had any trouble with the Fire falling over (I've used the stand only in the landscape orientation). I like the sleep/wake function built into the cover, the leather looks good, it adds very little weight to the Fire, there's no chemical smell, and the fit is snug without resorting to the use of corner straps or having to slip the Fire into a holder that covers the bezel. I like the cover so much I'm thinking of buying a second one in another color.

I don't think <hl> the cover seems cheaply made <hl> , nor have I had any trouble with the Fire falling over (I've used the stand only in the landscape orientation).

I don't think <hl> the cover seems cheaply made <hl>, nor have I had any trouble with the Fire falling over (I've used the stand only in the landscape orientation). I like the sleep/wake function built into the cover, the leather looks good, it adds very little weight to the Fire, there's no chemical smell, and the fit is snug without resorting to the use of corner straps or having to slip the Fire into a holder that covers the bezel. I like the cover so much I'm thinking of buying a second one in another color.

<hl> I don't think the cover seems cheaply made , nor have I had any trouble with the Fire falling over (I've used the stand only in the landscape orientation). <hl> I like the sleep/wake function built into the cover, the leather looks good, it adds very little weight to the Fire, there's no chemical smell, and the fit is snug without resorting to the use of corner straps or having to slip the Fire into a holder that covers the bezel. I like the cover so much I'm thinking of buying a second one in another color.

c08cd5f582a0313db4d9f6e456eaa4b7

electronics

awesome sound quality

question: How is the quality of headphones?, context: This is the best mini-mp3 player as in it has awesome sound quality, great volume, and easy access to buttons to change tracks on the fly while running. much easier than using a touchscreen or other players as you don't have to look or feel around just to change a track.4 stars only because i have to buy one ever 1-2 years... don't know if its my sweat breaking it or if they just crap out, but at this price i don't mind buying every so.

How is the quality of headphones?

This is the best mini-mp3 player as in it has awesome sound quality , great volume, and easy access to buttons to change tracks on the fly while running.

This is the best mini-mp3 player as in it has awesome sound quality, great volume, and easy access to buttons to change tracks on the fly while running. much easier than using a touchscreen or other players as you don't have to look or feel around just to change a track.4 stars only because i have to buy one ever 1-2 years... don't know if its my sweat breaking it or if they just crap out, but at this price i don't mind buying every so.

This is the best mini-mp3 player as in it has <hl> awesome sound quality <hl> , great volume, and easy access to buttons to change tracks on the fly while running.

This is the best mini-mp3 player as in it has <hl> awesome sound quality <hl>, great volume, and easy access to buttons to change tracks on the fly while running. much easier than using a touchscreen or other players as you don't have to look or feel around just to change a track.4 stars only because i have to buy one ever 1-2 years... don't know if its my sweat breaking it or if they just crap out, but at this price i don't mind buying every so.

<hl> This is the best mini-mp3 player as in it has awesome sound quality , great volume, and easy access to buttons to change tracks on the fly while running. <hl> much easier than using a touchscreen or other players as you don't have to look or feel around just to change a track.4 stars only because i have to buy one ever 1-2 years... don't know if its my sweat breaking it or if they just crap out, but at this price i don't mind buying every so.

8f393123c03d6a4d4f1890461284f8be

electronics

The image quality is amazing at this price point

question: How is the detail?, context: This is a great lens for stills. The only prime I would recommend over this as a first lens might be the 30mm.For video it is great, so long as you use a tripod. It has no image stabilization so handheld shots are unusable unless you are an unusually steady hand. I have not tried it with a rig yet, but its possible you can get suitable footage that was as well.The image quality is amazing at this price point. I couldn't find a cheaper lens to get started with that had the same quality image.

How is the detail?

The image quality is amazing at this price point .

This is a great lens for stills. The only prime I would recommend over this as a first lens might be the 30mm.For video it is great, so long as you use a tripod. It has no image stabilization so handheld shots are unusable unless you are an unusually steady hand. I have not tried it with a rig yet, but its possible you can get suitable footage that was as well.The image quality is amazing at this price point. I couldn't find a cheaper lens to get started with that had the same quality image.

<hl> The image quality is amazing at this price point <hl> .

This is a great lens for stills. The only prime I would recommend over this as a first lens might be the 30mm.For video it is great, so long as you use a tripod. It has no image stabilization so handheld shots are unusable unless you are an unusually steady hand. I have not tried it with a rig yet, but its possible you can get suitable footage that was as well.<hl> The image quality is amazing at this price point <hl>. I couldn't find a cheaper lens to get started with that had the same quality image.

This is a great lens for stills. The only prime I would recommend over this as a first lens might be the 30mm. For video it is great, so long as you use a tripod. It has no image stabilization so handheld shots are unusable unless you are an unusually steady hand. I have not tried it with a rig yet, but its possible you can get suitable footage that was as well. <hl> The image quality is amazing at this price point . <hl> I couldn't find a cheaper lens to get started with that had the same quality image.

e51931bb5fefcc11d3eed58dbb2f8e8d

electronics

These speakers sound decent, but the speakers themselves have absolutely NO bass in them at all

question: How is speaker?, context: I searched around on Amazon for quite a while and looked up reviews on several speakers all across the internet before finally making this purchase. I had a set of Bose Companion 2 speakers, and they were nice, but I constantly felt the lack of a subwoofer was leaving me wanting more bass. These speakers sound decent, but the speakers themselves have absolutely NO bass in them at all. Thankfully, there is a subwoofer with this set. On the control knob, you can adjust the speaker volume, the bass level, and there is a headphone jack and auxillery jack. The speakers are pretty thin so they don't take up much space on my desk. I have the subwoofer under my desk and so far everything seems to be working out okay. They get up to a decent volume also. If you are looking to not spend very much money, these will do the job for you. If you are looking for absolutely awesome speakers, look elsewhere. I'd recommend theseKlipsch ProMedia 2.1 THX Certified Computer Speaker System (Black). I've listened to these in Best Buy and they sound amazing!

How is speaker?

These speakers sound decent, but the speakers themselves have absolutely NO bass in them at all .

I searched around on Amazon for quite a while and looked up reviews on several speakers all across the internet before finally making this purchase. I had a set of Bose Companion 2 speakers, and they were nice, but I constantly felt the lack of a subwoofer was leaving me wanting more bass. These speakers sound decent, but the speakers themselves have absolutely NO bass in them at all. Thankfully, there is a subwoofer with this set. On the control knob, you can adjust the speaker volume, the bass level, and there is a headphone jack and auxillery jack. The speakers are pretty thin so they don't take up much space on my desk. I have the subwoofer under my desk and so far everything seems to be working out okay. They get up to a decent volume also. If you are looking to not spend very much money, these will do the job for you. If you are looking for absolutely awesome speakers, look elsewhere. I'd recommend theseKlipsch ProMedia 2.1 THX Certified Computer Speaker System (Black). I've listened to these in Best Buy and they sound amazing!

<hl> These speakers sound decent, but the speakers themselves have absolutely NO bass in them at all <hl> .

I searched around on Amazon for quite a while and looked up reviews on several speakers all across the internet before finally making this purchase. I had a set of Bose Companion 2 speakers, and they were nice, but I constantly felt the lack of a subwoofer was leaving me wanting more bass. <hl> These speakers sound decent, but the speakers themselves have absolutely NO bass in them at all <hl>. Thankfully, there is a subwoofer with this set. On the control knob, you can adjust the speaker volume, the bass level, and there is a headphone jack and auxillery jack. The speakers are pretty thin so they don't take up much space on my desk. I have the subwoofer under my desk and so far everything seems to be working out okay. They get up to a decent volume also. If you are looking to not spend very much money, these will do the job for you. If you are looking for absolutely awesome speakers, look elsewhere. I'd recommend theseKlipsch ProMedia 2.1 THX Certified Computer Speaker System (Black). I've listened to these in Best Buy and they sound amazing!

I searched around on Amazon for quite a while and looked up reviews on several speakers all across the internet before finally making this purchase. I had a set of Bose Companion 2 speakers, and they were nice, but I constantly felt the lack of a subwoofer was leaving me wanting more bass. <hl> These speakers sound decent, but the speakers themselves have absolutely NO bass in them at all . <hl> Thankfully, there is a subwoofer with this set. On the control knob, you can adjust the speaker volume, the bass level, and there is a headphone jack and auxillery jack. The speakers are pretty thin so they don't take up much space on my desk. I have the subwoofer under my desk and so far everything seems to be working out okay. They get up to a decent volume also. If you are looking to not spend very much money, these will do the job for you. If you are looking for absolutely awesome speakers, look elsewhere. I'd recommend theseKlipsch ProMedia 2.1 THX Certified Computer Speaker System (Black). I've listened to these in Best Buy and they sound amazing!

605f208309ff281235b68f7ba6eeacc7

electronics

It lasts long, and very reliable

question: How is the battery?, context: This is a perfect rechargeable battery. It lasts long, and very reliable. You may need a good quality charger for this to last longer, though, because even though the battery itself is very good, the charger may easily corrupt any battery.

How is the battery?

It lasts long, and very reliable .

This is a perfect rechargeable battery. It lasts long, and very reliable. You may need a good quality charger for this to last longer, though, because even though the battery itself is very good, the charger may easily corrupt any battery.

<hl> It lasts long, and very reliable <hl> .

This is a perfect rechargeable battery. <hl> It lasts long, and very reliable <hl>. You may need a good quality charger for this to last longer, though, because even though the battery itself is very good, the charger may easily corrupt any battery.

This is a perfect rechargeable battery. <hl> It lasts long, and very reliable . <hl> You may need a good quality charger for this to last longer, though, because even though the battery itself is very good, the charger may easily corrupt any battery.

4383e9c9888613ec6f03707a6437dc39

electronics

a great price & shipping so just

question: Does the price seem reasonable?, context: Got this for use in a Kodak PlayTouch HD video camera. Works exactly as you would expect. Transcend makes a solid product (I have several others) and Amazon has a great price & shipping so just click Buy and get it over with! =)

Does the price seem reasonable?

Transcend makes a solid product (I have several others) and Amazon has a great price & shipping so just click Buy and get it over with!

Got this for use in a Kodak PlayTouch HD video camera. Works exactly as you would expect. Transcend makes a solid product (I have several others) and Amazon has a great price & shipping so just click Buy and get it over with! =)

Transcend makes a solid product (I have several others) and Amazon has <hl> a great price & shipping so just <hl> click Buy and get it over with!

Got this for use in a Kodak PlayTouch HD video camera. Works exactly as you would expect. Transcend makes a solid product (I have several others) and Amazon has <hl> a great price & shipping so just <hl> click Buy and get it over with! =)

Got this for use in a Kodak PlayTouch HD video camera. Works exactly as you would expect. <hl> Transcend makes a solid product (I have several others) and Amazon has a great price & shipping so just click Buy and get it over with! <hl> =)

0cbffa144cb5299dcd46b88509bc2afa

electronics

Very impressive VR works well

question: What is the importance of that feature to you?, context: Pros:Voice recognition that actually works! Very impressive VR works well.Very simple, easy to use interface.Great value at current pricing.Sleek, compact design.Screen is bright and easy to read.Free map updates (within 60 days of first use)Software updated to fix issues recently. (v4.70)FM transmitter -- though depends on your car. Also has audio out/headphone jack.Can download lots of freebies like new voices, new vehicles, games, and so on. (Some of the games aren't too bad.)Useful Pedestrian mode and "last location" feature (where did I park my car?), off road (find your way back to car after hunting/hiking in woods) and so on.Can optimize multi-stop routes for speed and efficiency (would be great for deliveries, for example).On board HELP.Cons:No printed manual. Garmin can't include a proper printed manual? Shame. They included plenty of color advertising brochures, cards, and such.No A/C adapter (optional extra) -- but you can use most any A/C to USB adapter.Even with latest map update, some new businesses in my area and a large development site not listed.Remarks:I just got my 855 and am quite happy with it. I've only used it for trips around town, so far, so I need more time to give it a thorough test, but I thought I would go ahead and post some information which may be helpful to some of you. My initial impressions are good. The user interface is probably the easiest to use of any of my GPS devices. Screen is bright and clear. Everything works as expected.In local trips, the tracking seems very accurate, no issues there. The volume is adequate, but could be better. Using the FM transmitter worked well for me and had enough volume. Background static was only objectionable when the volume was turned up loud. Even better, I tried using a cassette adapter which worked very well and gave great sound. However, most of the time I just used the internal voice and speakers and they were acceptable.The Voice Recognition (VR) is the hot feature for this unit and I found it to work very well. Quite impressive, actually. It required no "training" and had a high degree of accuracy. It is the best VR I've seen yet on any portable device. Good enough to actually be useful. One prime example, I can use VR to "Zoom In" and "Zoom Out" (merely by saying those phrases) of the map while driving. I also found it worked very well to find locations on the fly. For example, you can say "Find Nearest Mexican Restaurant" and it will show a list, then you just pick (by saying the number) and "Go!" -- very handy! For the current price, this feature alone is worth the price of admission.So far, the navigation and routing has been fine, but I need to do more testing. Battery power is good (3-4 hours) and the ability to pop the unit out of the cradle and take with you to use on foot (think hiking, hunting, parks, large malls, etc.) and the "find my car" feature are nice pluses. The "Where am I?" is also a very easy and useful way to add locations to your favorites list.I'll come back and add more after I've had more time using the unit. Some more comments and tips below. [If you find this review useful, please click on the "Was this review helpful to you?" Yes (or No) below and feel free to leave a comment or ask a question. I'll do my best to answer those that I can. Thanks!]Comments:Found satellites and had good location within five minutes right out of the box in my family room. Good receiver.Replaceable battery! Can buy additional spares if needed (hiking, for example).VR works right off the bat - no "training" required. Very accurate in my experience so far. (No VR system is perfect.)Free Voice Studio software allows you to record your own voice prompts! I can see mischievous minds at work already. ;)Fast route calculations -- overall pretty snappy and accurateGood "MyGarmin" web site with lots of extras, FAQs and support info.Has jack for an external GPS antenna/receiver, though I doubt you'll ever need it. Might be helpful in some trucks.On screen touch keyboard works well and is easy to use.Lets you easily create and save routes at home before your trip! Some units I've had made this very difficult. Very nice feature that is simple and easy to use. Can save up to 10 Routes, each route can have multiple destinations and via points. Shows you distance and time of travel for each route saved. Very flexible. The 855 will optimize routes so you visit destinations in the most efficient order. Kudos, Garmin!Has on board HELPTips:-- Audio out/headphone jack provide an alternate way to get audio. Can use external powered speakers, for example. Many new cars have an audio in jack which will give better sound than via FM transmitter. I tried using a cassette adapter (such as used to play mp3's via car radio) plugged into headphone/audio out jack and it worked very well.-- I tried various A/C USB chargers and all worked fine. At first unit will go into "PC connected" mode, but if you wait 30 seconds or so, it will then switch to "normal" mode and you can use it as you normally would. Will charge battery fine. These chargers can be found for as little as $5 sometimes.-- You can press and hold battery icon to see more detailed information, such as per cent charged and even core temps. (Diagnostic display)-- I saw a tip somewhere online on how to adjust the internal mike gain to improve VR by decreasing the sensitivity to background noise. Will update later on this,-- While at home, you can easily set/save the location in favorites as "Home" (Overcomes common problem of house number locations being a bit off, which affects all GPS units, by the way.)-- Amazon camera case (item No. ??? , insert link) fits this unit perfectly and has belt loop for easy carry. (Will update this info later.)-- Cancel VR button on remote works as "back" button on menus, too.-- Use 128 CBR mp3's (constant bit rate) for best results.-- Minimize background noises when using VR for best results. (True with most VR gear.)-- After you do the map update, you still need to go to myGramin dashboard and check for the new software update. Follow the instructions very carefully. Takes awhile, but it works and will verify the update once done.-- You can fold a paper plate to make a bonnet to shield unit from sun (heat) ad make the display easier to read in bright sunlight (though I had no problems with this). Heat may be causing some of the lockups others here have experienced. (Punch holes and use rubber band to secure.)- In cases where a city or street name can not be understood, use the 'spell' option in VR mode and spell the name.8/5/2010 Update: Used this on a road trip this past weekend (200 miles) and it performed very well. So I can verify a few more things:1) Extremely fast recalculations if you deviate from the planned route. So fast, you might not even notice it. Fastest of any unit I have used.2) Very fast satellite lock when you stop (i.e. turn off the car and GPS) and restart. It will be ready before you are!3) I used the VR extensively and it worked very, very well. I had no problems even with the radio on (low) and some noise in the car. Yes, a sharp or loud background noise might cause you to have to repeat a command now and then, but this actually happened only rarely. Most of the time, it simply worked. I have not seen any other GPS with VR this good and this complete (in terms of supported functions). This was the most important feature for me and I am very pleased with it. You can truly use this GPS hands free nearly all of the time. And most importantly, *all* the functions you need while driving are supported. (Like zooming, accessing turn info, searching for POI's and so on.)4) This trip was one I have taken many times, so I know the various routes pretty well. I like to drive down one way and come back a different way. On the way back, it found a new, faster route on a tricky section. At first, I thought it was misdirecting me, but when I checked and then followed the new route, it was indeed a bit shorter/faster than the way I normally go and on as good or better roads.5) The estimated arrival times were right on the money.6) I used the built-in speakers most of the time and they were loud enough for me.7) Very easy to use, no problems or issues. The only other GPS I've used this good cost twice as much. Excellent at the main job of getting you where you want to go.

What is the importance of that feature to you?

Very impressive VR works well .Very simple, easy to use interface.

Pros:Voice recognition that actually works! Very impressive VR works well.Very simple, easy to use interface.Great value at current pricing.Sleek, compact design.Screen is bright and easy to read.Free map updates (within 60 days of first use)Software updated to fix issues recently. (v4.70)FM transmitter -- though depends on your car. Also has audio out/headphone jack.Can download lots of freebies like new voices, new vehicles, games, and so on. (Some of the games aren't too bad.)Useful Pedestrian mode and "last location" feature (where did I park my car?), off road (find your way back to car after hunting/hiking in woods) and so on.Can optimize multi-stop routes for speed and efficiency (would be great for deliveries, for example).On board HELP.Cons:No printed manual. Garmin can't include a proper printed manual? Shame. They included plenty of color advertising brochures, cards, and such.No A/C adapter (optional extra) -- but you can use most any A/C to USB adapter.Even with latest map update, some new businesses in my area and a large development site not listed.Remarks:I just got my 855 and am quite happy with it. I've only used it for trips around town, so far, so I need more time to give it a thorough test, but I thought I would go ahead and post some information which may be helpful to some of you. My initial impressions are good. The user interface is probably the easiest to use of any of my GPS devices. Screen is bright and clear. Everything works as expected.In local trips, the tracking seems very accurate, no issues there. The volume is adequate, but could be better. Using the FM transmitter worked well for me and had enough volume. Background static was only objectionable when the volume was turned up loud. Even better, I tried using a cassette adapter which worked very well and gave great sound. However, most of the time I just used the internal voice and speakers and they were acceptable.The Voice Recognition (VR) is the hot feature for this unit and I found it to work very well. Quite impressive, actually. It required no "training" and had a high degree of accuracy. It is the best VR I've seen yet on any portable device. Good enough to actually be useful. One prime example, I can use VR to "Zoom In" and "Zoom Out" (merely by saying those phrases) of the map while driving. I also found it worked very well to find locations on the fly. For example, you can say "Find Nearest Mexican Restaurant" and it will show a list, then you just pick (by saying the number) and "Go!" -- very handy! For the current price, this feature alone is worth the price of admission.So far, the navigation and routing has been fine, but I need to do more testing. Battery power is good (3-4 hours) and the ability to pop the unit out of the cradle and take with you to use on foot (think hiking, hunting, parks, large malls, etc.) and the "find my car" feature are nice pluses. The "Where am I?" is also a very easy and useful way to add locations to your favorites list.I'll come back and add more after I've had more time using the unit. Some more comments and tips below. [If you find this review useful, please click on the "Was this review helpful to you?" Yes (or No) below and feel free to leave a comment or ask a question. I'll do my best to answer those that I can. Thanks!]Comments:Found satellites and had good location within five minutes right out of the box in my family room. Good receiver.Replaceable battery! Can buy additional spares if needed (hiking, for example).VR works right off the bat - no "training" required. Very accurate in my experience so far. (No VR system is perfect.)Free Voice Studio software allows you to record your own voice prompts! I can see mischievous minds at work already. ;)Fast route calculations -- overall pretty snappy and accurateGood "MyGarmin" web site with lots of extras, FAQs and support info.Has jack for an external GPS antenna/receiver, though I doubt you'll ever need it. Might be helpful in some trucks.On screen touch keyboard works well and is easy to use.Lets you easily create and save routes at home before your trip! Some units I've had made this very difficult. Very nice feature that is simple and easy to use. Can save up to 10 Routes, each route can have multiple destinations and via points. Shows you distance and time of travel for each route saved. Very flexible. The 855 will optimize routes so you visit destinations in the most efficient order. Kudos, Garmin!Has on board HELPTips:-- Audio out/headphone jack provide an alternate way to get audio. Can use external powered speakers, for example. Many new cars have an audio in jack which will give better sound than via FM transmitter. I tried using a cassette adapter (such as used to play mp3's via car radio) plugged into headphone/audio out jack and it worked very well.-- I tried various A/C USB chargers and all worked fine. At first unit will go into "PC connected" mode, but if you wait 30 seconds or so, it will then switch to "normal" mode and you can use it as you normally would. Will charge battery fine. These chargers can be found for as little as $5 sometimes.-- You can press and hold battery icon to see more detailed information, such as per cent charged and even core temps. (Diagnostic display)-- I saw a tip somewhere online on how to adjust the internal mike gain to improve VR by decreasing the sensitivity to background noise. Will update later on this,-- While at home, you can easily set/save the location in favorites as "Home" (Overcomes common problem of house number locations being a bit off, which affects all GPS units, by the way.)-- Amazon camera case (item No. ??? , insert link) fits this unit perfectly and has belt loop for easy carry. (Will update this info later.)-- Cancel VR button on remote works as "back" button on menus, too.-- Use 128 CBR mp3's (constant bit rate) for best results.-- Minimize background noises when using VR for best results. (True with most VR gear.)-- After you do the map update, you still need to go to myGramin dashboard and check for the new software update. Follow the instructions very carefully. Takes awhile, but it works and will verify the update once done.-- You can fold a paper plate to make a bonnet to shield unit from sun (heat) ad make the display easier to read in bright sunlight (though I had no problems with this). Heat may be causing some of the lockups others here have experienced. (Punch holes and use rubber band to secure.)- In cases where a city or street name can not be understood, use the 'spell' option in VR mode and spell the name.8/5/2010 Update: Used this on a road trip this past weekend (200 miles) and it performed very well. So I can verify a few more things:1) Extremely fast recalculations if you deviate from the planned route. So fast, you might not even notice it. Fastest of any unit I have used.2) Very fast satellite lock when you stop (i.e. turn off the car and GPS) and restart. It will be ready before you are!3) I used the VR extensively and it worked very, very well. I had no problems even with the radio on (low) and some noise in the car. Yes, a sharp or loud background noise might cause you to have to repeat a command now and then, but this actually happened only rarely. Most of the time, it simply worked. I have not seen any other GPS with VR this good and this complete (in terms of supported functions). This was the most important feature for me and I am very pleased with it. You can truly use this GPS hands free nearly all of the time. And most importantly, *all* the functions you need while driving are supported. (Like zooming, accessing turn info, searching for POI's and so on.)4) This trip was one I have taken many times, so I know the various routes pretty well. I like to drive down one way and come back a different way. On the way back, it found a new, faster route on a tricky section. At first, I thought it was misdirecting me, but when I checked and then followed the new route, it was indeed a bit shorter/faster than the way I normally go and on as good or better roads.5) The estimated arrival times were right on the money.6) I used the built-in speakers most of the time and they were loud enough for me.7) Very easy to use, no problems or issues. The only other GPS I've used this good cost twice as much. Excellent at the main job of getting you where you want to go.

<hl> Very impressive VR works well <hl> .Very simple, easy to use interface.

Pros:Voice recognition that actually works! <hl> Very impressive VR works well <hl>.Very simple, easy to use interface.Great value at current pricing.Sleek, compact design.Screen is bright and easy to read.Free map updates (within 60 days of first use)Software updated to fix issues recently. (v4.70)FM transmitter -- though depends on your car. Also has audio out/headphone jack.Can download lots of freebies like new voices, new vehicles, games, and so on. (Some of the games aren't too bad.)Useful Pedestrian mode and "last location" feature (where did I park my car?), off road (find your way back to car after hunting/hiking in woods) and so on.Can optimize multi-stop routes for speed and efficiency (would be great for deliveries, for example).On board HELP.Cons:No printed manual. Garmin can't include a proper printed manual? Shame. They included plenty of color advertising brochures, cards, and such.No A/C adapter (optional extra) -- but you can use most any A/C to USB adapter.Even with latest map update, some new businesses in my area and a large development site not listed.Remarks:I just got my 855 and am quite happy with it. I've only used it for trips around town, so far, so I need more time to give it a thorough test, but I thought I would go ahead and post some information which may be helpful to some of you. My initial impressions are good. The user interface is probably the easiest to use of any of my GPS devices. Screen is bright and clear. Everything works as expected.In local trips, the tracking seems very accurate, no issues there. The volume is adequate, but could be better. Using the FM transmitter worked well for me and had enough volume. Background static was only objectionable when the volume was turned up loud. Even better, I tried using a cassette adapter which worked very well and gave great sound. However, most of the time I just used the internal voice and speakers and they were acceptable.The Voice Recognition (VR) is the hot feature for this unit and I found it to work very well. Quite impressive, actually. It required no "training" and had a high degree of accuracy. It is the best VR I've seen yet on any portable device. Good enough to actually be useful. One prime example, I can use VR to "Zoom In" and "Zoom Out" (merely by saying those phrases) of the map while driving. I also found it worked very well to find locations on the fly. For example, you can say "Find Nearest Mexican Restaurant" and it will show a list, then you just pick (by saying the number) and "Go!" -- very handy! For the current price, this feature alone is worth the price of admission.So far, the navigation and routing has been fine, but I need to do more testing. Battery power is good (3-4 hours) and the ability to pop the unit out of the cradle and take with you to use on foot (think hiking, hunting, parks, large malls, etc.) and the "find my car" feature are nice pluses. The "Where am I?" is also a very easy and useful way to add locations to your favorites list.I'll come back and add more after I've had more time using the unit. Some more comments and tips below. [If you find this review useful, please click on the "Was this review helpful to you?" Yes (or No) below and feel free to leave a comment or ask a question. I'll do my best to answer those that I can. Thanks!]Comments:Found satellites and had good location within five minutes right out of the box in my family room. Good receiver.Replaceable battery! Can buy additional spares if needed (hiking, for example).VR works right off the bat - no "training" required. Very accurate in my experience so far. (No VR system is perfect.)Free Voice Studio software allows you to record your own voice prompts! I can see mischievous minds at work already. ;)Fast route calculations -- overall pretty snappy and accurateGood "MyGarmin" web site with lots of extras, FAQs and support info.Has jack for an external GPS antenna/receiver, though I doubt you'll ever need it. Might be helpful in some trucks.On screen touch keyboard works well and is easy to use.Lets you easily create and save routes at home before your trip! Some units I've had made this very difficult. Very nice feature that is simple and easy to use. Can save up to 10 Routes, each route can have multiple destinations and via points. Shows you distance and time of travel for each route saved. Very flexible. The 855 will optimize routes so you visit destinations in the most efficient order. Kudos, Garmin!Has on board HELPTips:-- Audio out/headphone jack provide an alternate way to get audio. Can use external powered speakers, for example. Many new cars have an audio in jack which will give better sound than via FM transmitter. I tried using a cassette adapter (such as used to play mp3's via car radio) plugged into headphone/audio out jack and it worked very well.-- I tried various A/C USB chargers and all worked fine. At first unit will go into "PC connected" mode, but if you wait 30 seconds or so, it will then switch to "normal" mode and you can use it as you normally would. Will charge battery fine. These chargers can be found for as little as $5 sometimes.-- You can press and hold battery icon to see more detailed information, such as per cent charged and even core temps. (Diagnostic display)-- I saw a tip somewhere online on how to adjust the internal mike gain to improve VR by decreasing the sensitivity to background noise. Will update later on this,-- While at home, you can easily set/save the location in favorites as "Home" (Overcomes common problem of house number locations being a bit off, which affects all GPS units, by the way.)-- Amazon camera case (item No. ??? , insert link) fits this unit perfectly and has belt loop for easy carry. (Will update this info later.)-- Cancel VR button on remote works as "back" button on menus, too.-- Use 128 CBR mp3's (constant bit rate) for best results.-- Minimize background noises when using VR for best results. (True with most VR gear.)-- After you do the map update, you still need to go to myGramin dashboard and check for the new software update. Follow the instructions very carefully. Takes awhile, but it works and will verify the update once done.-- You can fold a paper plate to make a bonnet to shield unit from sun (heat) ad make the display easier to read in bright sunlight (though I had no problems with this). Heat may be causing some of the lockups others here have experienced. (Punch holes and use rubber band to secure.)- In cases where a city or street name can not be understood, use the 'spell' option in VR mode and spell the name.8/5/2010 Update: Used this on a road trip this past weekend (200 miles) and it performed very well. So I can verify a few more things:1) Extremely fast recalculations if you deviate from the planned route. So fast, you might not even notice it. Fastest of any unit I have used.2) Very fast satellite lock when you stop (i.e. turn off the car and GPS) and restart. It will be ready before you are!3) I used the VR extensively and it worked very, very well. I had no problems even with the radio on (low) and some noise in the car. Yes, a sharp or loud background noise might cause you to have to repeat a command now and then, but this actually happened only rarely. Most of the time, it simply worked. I have not seen any other GPS with VR this good and this complete (in terms of supported functions). This was the most important feature for me and I am very pleased with it. You can truly use this GPS hands free nearly all of the time. And most importantly, *all* the functions you need while driving are supported. (Like zooming, accessing turn info, searching for POI's and so on.)4) This trip was one I have taken many times, so I know the various routes pretty well. I like to drive down one way and come back a different way. On the way back, it found a new, faster route on a tricky section. At first, I thought it was misdirecting me, but when I checked and then followed the new route, it was indeed a bit shorter/faster than the way I normally go and on as good or better roads.5) The estimated arrival times were right on the money.6) I used the built-in speakers most of the time and they were loud enough for me.7) Very easy to use, no problems or issues. The only other GPS I've used this good cost twice as much. Excellent at the main job of getting you where you want to go.

Pros:Voice recognition that actually works! <hl> Very impressive VR works well .Very simple, easy to use interface. <hl> Great value at current pricing. Sleek, compact design. Screen is bright and easy to read. Free map updates (within 60 days of first use)Software updated to fix issues recently. (v4.70)FM transmitter -- though depends on your car. Also has audio out/headphone jack. Can download lots of freebies like new voices, new vehicles, games, and so on. (Some of the games aren't too bad.)Useful Pedestrian mode and "last location" feature (where did I park my car?), off road (find your way back to car after hunting/hiking in woods) and so on. Can optimize multi-stop routes for speed and efficiency (would be great for deliveries, for example).On board HELP.Cons:No printed manual. Garmin can't include a proper printed manual? Shame. They included plenty of color advertising brochures, cards, and such. No A/C adapter (optional extra) -- but you can use most any A/C to USB adapter. Even with latest map update, some new businesses in my area and a large development site not listed. Remarks:I just got my 855 and am quite happy with it. I've only used it for trips around town, so far, so I need more time to give it a thorough test, but I thought I would go ahead and post some information which may be helpful to some of you. My initial impressions are good. The user interface is probably the easiest to use of any of my GPS devices. Screen is bright and clear. Everything works as expected. In local trips, the tracking seems very accurate, no issues there. The volume is adequate, but could be better. Using the FM transmitter worked well for me and had enough volume. Background static was only objectionable when the volume was turned up loud. Even better, I tried using a cassette adapter which worked very well and gave great sound. However, most of the time I just used the internal voice and speakers and they were acceptable. The Voice Recognition (VR) is the hot feature for this unit and I found it to work very well. Quite impressive, actually. It required no "training" and had a high degree of accuracy. It is the best VR I've seen yet on any portable device. Good enough to actually be useful. One prime example, I can use VR to "Zoom In" and "Zoom Out" (merely by saying those phrases) of the map while driving. I also found it worked very well to find locations on the fly. For example, you can say "Find Nearest Mexican Restaurant" and it will show a list, then you just pick (by saying the number) and "Go!" -- very handy! For the current price, this feature alone is worth the price of admission. So far, the navigation and routing has been fine, but I need to do more testing. Battery power is good (3-4 hours) and the ability to pop the unit out of the cradle and take with you to use on foot (think hiking, hunting, parks, large malls, etc.) and the "find my car" feature are nice pluses. The "Where am I?" is also a very easy and useful way to add locations to your favorites list. I'll come back and add more after I've had more time using the unit. Some more comments and tips below. [If you find this review useful, please click on the "Was this review helpful to you?" Yes (or No) below and feel free to leave a comment or ask a question. I'll do my best to answer those that I can. Thanks!]Comments:Found satellites and had good location within five minutes right out of the box in my family room. Good receiver. Replaceable battery! Can buy additional spares if needed (hiking, for example).VR works right off the bat - no "training" required. Very accurate in my experience so far. (No VR system is perfect.)Free Voice Studio software allows you to record your own voice prompts! I can see mischievous minds at work already. ;)Fast route calculations -- overall pretty snappy and accurateGood "MyGarmin" web site with lots of extras, FAQs and support info. Has jack for an external GPS antenna/receiver, though I doubt you'll ever need it. Might be helpful in some trucks. On screen touch keyboard works well and is easy to use. Lets you easily create and save routes at home before your trip! Some units I've had made this very difficult. Very nice feature that is simple and easy to use. Can save up to 10 Routes, each route can have multiple destinations and via points. Shows you distance and time of travel for each route saved. Very flexible. The 855 will optimize routes so you visit destinations in the most efficient order. Kudos, Garmin!Has on board HELPTips:-- Audio out/headphone jack provide an alternate way to get audio. Can use external powered speakers, for example. Many new cars have an audio in jack which will give better sound than via FM transmitter. I tried using a cassette adapter (such as used to play mp3's via car radio) plugged into headphone/audio out jack and it worked very well.-- I tried various A/C USB chargers and all worked fine. At first unit will go into "PC connected" mode, but if you wait 30 seconds or so, it will then switch to "normal" mode and you can use it as you normally would. Will charge battery fine. These chargers can be found for as little as $5 sometimes.-- You can press and hold battery icon to see more detailed information, such as per cent charged and even core temps. (Diagnostic display)-- I saw a tip somewhere online on how to adjust the internal mike gain to improve VR by decreasing the sensitivity to background noise. Will update later on this,-- While at home, you can easily set/save the location in favorites as "Home" (Overcomes common problem of house number locations being a bit off, which affects all GPS units, by the way.)-- Amazon camera case (item No. ??? , insert link) fits this unit perfectly and has belt loop for easy carry. (Will update this info later.)-- Cancel VR button on remote works as "back" button on menus, too.-- Use 128 CBR mp3's (constant bit rate) for best results.-- Minimize background noises when using VR for best results. (True with most VR gear.)-- After you do the map update, you still need to go to myGramin dashboard and check for the new software update. Follow the instructions very carefully. Takes awhile, but it works and will verify the update once done.-- You can fold a paper plate to make a bonnet to shield unit from sun (heat) ad make the display easier to read in bright sunlight (though I had no problems with this). Heat may be causing some of the lockups others here have experienced. (Punch holes and use rubber band to secure.)- In cases where a city or street name can not be understood, use the 'spell' option in VR mode and spell the name.8/5/2010 Update: Used this on a road trip this past weekend (200 miles) and it performed very well. So I can verify a few more things:1) Extremely fast recalculations if you deviate from the planned route. So fast, you might not even notice it. Fastest of any unit I have used.2) Very fast satellite lock when you stop (i.e. turn off the car and GPS) and restart. It will be ready before you are!3) I used the VR extensively and it worked very, very well. I had no problems even with the radio on (low) and some noise in the car. Yes, a sharp or loud background noise might cause you to have to repeat a command now and then, but this actually happened only rarely. Most of the time, it simply worked. I have not seen any other GPS with VR this good and this complete (in terms of supported functions). This was the most important feature for me and I am very pleased with it. You can truly use this GPS hands free nearly all of the time. And most importantly, *all* the functions you need while driving are supported. (Like zooming, accessing turn info, searching for POI's and so on.)4) This trip was one I have taken many times, so I know the various routes pretty well. I like to drive down one way and come back a different way. On the way back, it found a new, faster route on a tricky section. At first, I thought it was misdirecting me, but when I checked and then followed the new route, it was indeed a bit shorter/faster than the way I normally go and on as good or better roads.5) The estimated arrival times were right on the money.6) I used the built-in speakers most of the time and they were loud enough for me.7) Very easy to use, no problems or issues. The only other GPS I've used this good cost twice as much. Excellent at the main job of getting you where you want to go.

0facc08ebc398622d5a6ab9c7b2af673

electronics

both screens look bright and sharp

question: How good is the resolution of the screen?, context: I am a Kindle Fire HD fan. (so some of you should stop reading now) The new Nexus 7 really gives the Kindle Fire a run for its money as an entertainment device. I only have one Amazon movie, but use Hulu Plus and NetFlix. Both of those work great on both devices. Come to think of it, I didn't try viewing my Amazon Prime movie on the Nexus. My main use is web browsing, books, music and video files. The new Nexus has speakers that sound pretty much just as nice (and loud) as the KFHD. There might be a difference in screen resolution, but my eyes can't tell - both screens look bright and sharp.Books - Text to speech on Amazon Kindle books only works on the KFHD. Since many, if not most of my books are Amazon, that is a bummer - I like text to speech for when I am driving and listening at bedtime. Audible's audiobooks works fine on both.Web Browsing. Believe it or not, I side-loaded Chrome on my KFHD some time ago, but I really just use Silk. Silk is fine for my needs.So both are fine devices, so what are the attractions to one over the other?- Nexus 7 has my favorite Google apps - like Google Maps.- Nexus 7 has GPS, which sounds useful, haven't played much with it yet.- Nexus 7 allows multiple user accounts. That will really be handy.- Nexus 7's back facing camera lets you take pictures even it you look funny doing it.- Google Play store has a bajillion apps, 99.9997% of which I don't care about. But there are a half dozen I would like that aren't on Amazon's store.- Kindle Fire's built-in ebook reader will display both Amazon and non-Amazon books and will do text to speech on them all.I own both, but if I had pick just one today, I'd pick the Nexus 7. BUT, I noticed today that only the 16 gig version of the KFHD is for sale at Amazon. Perhaps Amazon is about to release a new version? Next month could be a different story.There are minor details, like the Nexus needs a special adapter cable for HDMI out where the KFHD uses a separate, "normal" socket. And the Nexus buttons are tiny and I find myself fumbling to find them.If you have an older model and are thinking of upgrading, perhaps waiting to see what Amazon responds to the Nexus 2013 with would be good. To be totally honest, I am now a fan of both tablets. And married to an iPod Touch fangirl who demands a unit she can slip into her pocket.

How good is the resolution of the screen?

There might be a difference in screen resolution, but my eyes can't tell - both screens look bright and sharp .Books - Text to speech on Amazon Kindle books only works on the KFHD.

I am a Kindle Fire HD fan. (so some of you should stop reading now) The new Nexus 7 really gives the Kindle Fire a run for its money as an entertainment device. I only have one Amazon movie, but use Hulu Plus and NetFlix. Both of those work great on both devices. Come to think of it, I didn't try viewing my Amazon Prime movie on the Nexus. My main use is web browsing, books, music and video files. The new Nexus has speakers that sound pretty much just as nice (and loud) as the KFHD. There might be a difference in screen resolution, but my eyes can't tell - both screens look bright and sharp.Books - Text to speech on Amazon Kindle books only works on the KFHD. Since many, if not most of my books are Amazon, that is a bummer - I like text to speech for when I am driving and listening at bedtime. Audible's audiobooks works fine on both.Web Browsing. Believe it or not, I side-loaded Chrome on my KFHD some time ago, but I really just use Silk. Silk is fine for my needs.So both are fine devices, so what are the attractions to one over the other?- Nexus 7 has my favorite Google apps - like Google Maps.- Nexus 7 has GPS, which sounds useful, haven't played much with it yet.- Nexus 7 allows multiple user accounts. That will really be handy.- Nexus 7's back facing camera lets you take pictures even it you look funny doing it.- Google Play store has a bajillion apps, 99.9997% of which I don't care about. But there are a half dozen I would like that aren't on Amazon's store.- Kindle Fire's built-in ebook reader will display both Amazon and non-Amazon books and will do text to speech on them all.I own both, but if I had pick just one today, I'd pick the Nexus 7. BUT, I noticed today that only the 16 gig version of the KFHD is for sale at Amazon. Perhaps Amazon is about to release a new version? Next month could be a different story.There are minor details, like the Nexus needs a special adapter cable for HDMI out where the KFHD uses a separate, "normal" socket. And the Nexus buttons are tiny and I find myself fumbling to find them.If you have an older model and are thinking of upgrading, perhaps waiting to see what Amazon responds to the Nexus 2013 with would be good. To be totally honest, I am now a fan of both tablets. And married to an iPod Touch fangirl who demands a unit she can slip into her pocket.

There might be a difference in screen resolution, but my eyes can't tell - <hl> both screens look bright and sharp <hl> .Books - Text to speech on Amazon Kindle books only works on the KFHD.

I am a Kindle Fire HD fan. (so some of you should stop reading now) The new Nexus 7 really gives the Kindle Fire a run for its money as an entertainment device. I only have one Amazon movie, but use Hulu Plus and NetFlix. Both of those work great on both devices. Come to think of it, I didn't try viewing my Amazon Prime movie on the Nexus. My main use is web browsing, books, music and video files. The new Nexus has speakers that sound pretty much just as nice (and loud) as the KFHD. There might be a difference in screen resolution, but my eyes can't tell - <hl> both screens look bright and sharp <hl>.Books - Text to speech on Amazon Kindle books only works on the KFHD. Since many, if not most of my books are Amazon, that is a bummer - I like text to speech for when I am driving and listening at bedtime. Audible's audiobooks works fine on both.Web Browsing. Believe it or not, I side-loaded Chrome on my KFHD some time ago, but I really just use Silk. Silk is fine for my needs.So both are fine devices, so what are the attractions to one over the other?- Nexus 7 has my favorite Google apps - like Google Maps.- Nexus 7 has GPS, which sounds useful, haven't played much with it yet.- Nexus 7 allows multiple user accounts. That will really be handy.- Nexus 7's back facing camera lets you take pictures even it you look funny doing it.- Google Play store has a bajillion apps, 99.9997% of which I don't care about. But there are a half dozen I would like that aren't on Amazon's store.- Kindle Fire's built-in ebook reader will display both Amazon and non-Amazon books and will do text to speech on them all.I own both, but if I had pick just one today, I'd pick the Nexus 7. BUT, I noticed today that only the 16 gig version of the KFHD is for sale at Amazon. Perhaps Amazon is about to release a new version? Next month could be a different story.There are minor details, like the Nexus needs a special adapter cable for HDMI out where the KFHD uses a separate, "normal" socket. And the Nexus buttons are tiny and I find myself fumbling to find them.If you have an older model and are thinking of upgrading, perhaps waiting to see what Amazon responds to the Nexus 2013 with would be good. To be totally honest, I am now a fan of both tablets. And married to an iPod Touch fangirl who demands a unit she can slip into her pocket.

I am a Kindle Fire HD fan. (so some of you should stop reading now) The new Nexus 7 really gives the Kindle Fire a run for its money as an entertainment device. I only have one Amazon movie, but use Hulu Plus and NetFlix. Both of those work great on both devices. Come to think of it, I didn't try viewing my Amazon Prime movie on the Nexus. My main use is web browsing, books, music and video files. The new Nexus has speakers that sound pretty much just as nice (and loud) as the KFHD. <hl> There might be a difference in screen resolution, but my eyes can't tell - both screens look bright and sharp .Books - Text to speech on Amazon Kindle books only works on the KFHD. <hl> Since many, if not most of my books are Amazon, that is a bummer - I like text to speech for when I am driving and listening at bedtime. Audible's audiobooks works fine on both. Web Browsing. Believe it or not, I side-loaded Chrome on my KFHD some time ago, but I really just use Silk. Silk is fine for my needs. So both are fine devices, so what are the attractions to one over the other?- Nexus 7 has my favorite Google apps - like Google Maps.- Nexus 7 has GPS, which sounds useful, haven't played much with it yet.- Nexus 7 allows multiple user accounts. That will really be handy.- Nexus 7's back facing camera lets you take pictures even it you look funny doing it.- Google Play store has a bajillion apps, 99.9997% of which I don't care about. But there are a half dozen I would like that aren't on Amazon's store.- Kindle Fire's built-in ebook reader will display both Amazon and non-Amazon books and will do text to speech on them all. I own both, but if I had pick just one today, I'd pick the Nexus 7. BUT, I noticed today that only the 16 gig version of the KFHD is for sale at Amazon. Perhaps Amazon is about to release a new version? Next month could be a different story. There are minor details, like the Nexus needs a special adapter cable for HDMI out where the KFHD uses a separate, "normal" socket. And the Nexus buttons are tiny and I find myself fumbling to find them. If you have an older model and are thinking of upgrading, perhaps waiting to see what Amazon responds to the Nexus 2013 with would be good. To be totally honest, I am now a fan of both tablets. And married to an iPod Touch fangirl who demands a unit she can slip into her pocket.

7affc9b1d84f7a6f5e5d4abf7fe1755d

electronics

cheepo tablets you can get for $99

question: How is the price?, context: AWESOME, INCREDIBLE, Any other positive you can think of. I have been thinking about getting a tablet for each of my daughters and have been reading reviews and checking out every device I can get my hands on. I know I didn't want the el-cheepo tablets you can get for $99. I've seen those and checked them out and they are tablets, but generally have older operating system, lack support, and don't support all the apps. I didn't want a limited device. I also didn't want to spend $350 per device either. I have heard of people that got the Kindles and were very happy with them so I decided to take a chance and get 2 of them. For the price of the refurb devices, with a percentage off e-coupon that I had, plus using my amazon points from my Amazon credit card, I was able to basically get 2 of these for the price of one. I set my expectations a bit low because I didn't think of them as full tablets, but I'm happy to report I was rather wrong in that area. I was very, very impressed with the Kindle Fire HD 7 inch tablet. I have a full 10 inch Acer Iconia tablet that I like and my kids like but it's a bit large for them. This is the perfect size and feels so good in the hands. The screen is very clear, and the sound these things produce is just amazing. I couldn't believe how amazing the sound on these is, and how loud! My kids are getting them for Christmas and I can't wait to see their jaws hit the ground! Amazon uses a custom interface for the Android OS, but it doesn't make it any less functional. It is a bit different getting used to compared with the standard Android interface, but it works fine. It was able to do pretty much whatever I wanted to do with it. Once you get used to the different interface, it's just as easy to get around in it as anything else, and if it's your first exposure to the world of tablet devices, I think it would be much easier to learn and get comfortable with. I can't be happier with these things and actually, even though I have a 10 inch tablet, I'm very much considering getting one of these for me too. I like it that much.Now, as for the refurbished part, don't be afraid of that word. I get refurb stuff all the time and so far, here's what my experience is... they are great! It seems like the refurb items have had all the bugs worked out and have had more rigorous testing than the new devices. I've had plenty of new things stop working on me and had to get them replaced or repaired, but I've never had one single refurb device have any issue at all... ever (knock on wood!!). These had no signs of ever having been used. Not one single scratch or blemish, and Amazon's support is growing to be legend. They want people to be happy with their purchases and will go the extra mile to ensure you are, so the support they offer is very good.I guess the bottom line is, if you are looking to get a tablet to start into the tablet world, or want something for the kids, then you have to consider this. The price is excellent and it's a great tablet. You won't be dissapointed.

How is the price?

I know I didn't want the el- cheepo tablets you can get for $99 .

AWESOME, INCREDIBLE, Any other positive you can think of. I have been thinking about getting a tablet for each of my daughters and have been reading reviews and checking out every device I can get my hands on. I know I didn't want the el-cheepo tablets you can get for $99. I've seen those and checked them out and they are tablets, but generally have older operating system, lack support, and don't support all the apps. I didn't want a limited device. I also didn't want to spend $350 per device either. I have heard of people that got the Kindles and were very happy with them so I decided to take a chance and get 2 of them. For the price of the refurb devices, with a percentage off e-coupon that I had, plus using my amazon points from my Amazon credit card, I was able to basically get 2 of these for the price of one. I set my expectations a bit low because I didn't think of them as full tablets, but I'm happy to report I was rather wrong in that area. I was very, very impressed with the Kindle Fire HD 7 inch tablet. I have a full 10 inch Acer Iconia tablet that I like and my kids like but it's a bit large for them. This is the perfect size and feels so good in the hands. The screen is very clear, and the sound these things produce is just amazing. I couldn't believe how amazing the sound on these is, and how loud! My kids are getting them for Christmas and I can't wait to see their jaws hit the ground! Amazon uses a custom interface for the Android OS, but it doesn't make it any less functional. It is a bit different getting used to compared with the standard Android interface, but it works fine. It was able to do pretty much whatever I wanted to do with it. Once you get used to the different interface, it's just as easy to get around in it as anything else, and if it's your first exposure to the world of tablet devices, I think it would be much easier to learn and get comfortable with. I can't be happier with these things and actually, even though I have a 10 inch tablet, I'm very much considering getting one of these for me too. I like it that much.Now, as for the refurbished part, don't be afraid of that word. I get refurb stuff all the time and so far, here's what my experience is... they are great! It seems like the refurb items have had all the bugs worked out and have had more rigorous testing than the new devices. I've had plenty of new things stop working on me and had to get them replaced or repaired, but I've never had one single refurb device have any issue at all... ever (knock on wood!!). These had no signs of ever having been used. Not one single scratch or blemish, and Amazon's support is growing to be legend. They want people to be happy with their purchases and will go the extra mile to ensure you are, so the support they offer is very good.I guess the bottom line is, if you are looking to get a tablet to start into the tablet world, or want something for the kids, then you have to consider this. The price is excellent and it's a great tablet. You won't be dissapointed.

I know I didn't want the el- <hl> cheepo tablets you can get for $99 <hl> .

AWESOME, INCREDIBLE, Any other positive you can think of. I have been thinking about getting a tablet for each of my daughters and have been reading reviews and checking out every device I can get my hands on. I know I didn't want the el-<hl> cheepo tablets you can get for $99 <hl>. I've seen those and checked them out and they are tablets, but generally have older operating system, lack support, and don't support all the apps. I didn't want a limited device. I also didn't want to spend $350 per device either. I have heard of people that got the Kindles and were very happy with them so I decided to take a chance and get 2 of them. For the price of the refurb devices, with a percentage off e-coupon that I had, plus using my amazon points from my Amazon credit card, I was able to basically get 2 of these for the price of one. I set my expectations a bit low because I didn't think of them as full tablets, but I'm happy to report I was rather wrong in that area. I was very, very impressed with the Kindle Fire HD 7 inch tablet. I have a full 10 inch Acer Iconia tablet that I like and my kids like but it's a bit large for them. This is the perfect size and feels so good in the hands. The screen is very clear, and the sound these things produce is just amazing. I couldn't believe how amazing the sound on these is, and how loud! My kids are getting them for Christmas and I can't wait to see their jaws hit the ground! Amazon uses a custom interface for the Android OS, but it doesn't make it any less functional. It is a bit different getting used to compared with the standard Android interface, but it works fine. It was able to do pretty much whatever I wanted to do with it. Once you get used to the different interface, it's just as easy to get around in it as anything else, and if it's your first exposure to the world of tablet devices, I think it would be much easier to learn and get comfortable with. I can't be happier with these things and actually, even though I have a 10 inch tablet, I'm very much considering getting one of these for me too. I like it that much.Now, as for the refurbished part, don't be afraid of that word. I get refurb stuff all the time and so far, here's what my experience is... they are great! It seems like the refurb items have had all the bugs worked out and have had more rigorous testing than the new devices. I've had plenty of new things stop working on me and had to get them replaced or repaired, but I've never had one single refurb device have any issue at all... ever (knock on wood!!). These had no signs of ever having been used. Not one single scratch or blemish, and Amazon's support is growing to be legend. They want people to be happy with their purchases and will go the extra mile to ensure you are, so the support they offer is very good.I guess the bottom line is, if you are looking to get a tablet to start into the tablet world, or want something for the kids, then you have to consider this. The price is excellent and it's a great tablet. You won't be dissapointed.

AWESOME, INCREDIBLE, Any other positive you can think of. I have been thinking about getting a tablet for each of my daughters and have been reading reviews and checking out every device I can get my hands on. <hl> I know I didn't want the el- cheepo tablets you can get for $99 . <hl> I've seen those and checked them out and they are tablets, but generally have older operating system, lack support, and don't support all the apps. I didn't want a limited device. I also didn't want to spend $350 per device either. I have heard of people that got the Kindles and were very happy with them so I decided to take a chance and get 2 of them. For the price of the refurb devices, with a percentage off e-coupon that I had, plus using my amazon points from my Amazon credit card, I was able to basically get 2 of these for the price of one. I set my expectations a bit low because I didn't think of them as full tablets, but I'm happy to report I was rather wrong in that area. I was very, very impressed with the Kindle Fire HD 7 inch tablet. I have a full 10 inch Acer Iconia tablet that I like and my kids like but it's a bit large for them. This is the perfect size and feels so good in the hands. The screen is very clear, and the sound these things produce is just amazing. I couldn't believe how amazing the sound on these is, and how loud! My kids are getting them for Christmas and I can't wait to see their jaws hit the ground! Amazon uses a custom interface for the Android OS, but it doesn't make it any less functional. It is a bit different getting used to compared with the standard Android interface, but it works fine. It was able to do pretty much whatever I wanted to do with it. Once you get used to the different interface, it's just as easy to get around in it as anything else, and if it's your first exposure to the world of tablet devices, I think it would be much easier to learn and get comfortable with. I can't be happier with these things and actually, even though I have a 10 inch tablet, I'm very much considering getting one of these for me too. I like it that much. Now, as for the refurbished part, don't be afraid of that word. I get refurb stuff all the time and so far, here's what my experience is... they are great! It seems like the refurb items have had all the bugs worked out and have had more rigorous testing than the new devices. I've had plenty of new things stop working on me and had to get them replaced or repaired, but I've never had one single refurb device have any issue at all... ever (knock on wood!!). These had no signs of ever having been used. Not one single scratch or blemish, and Amazon's support is growing to be legend. They want people to be happy with their purchases and will go the extra mile to ensure you are, so the support they offer is very good. I guess the bottom line is, if you are looking to get a tablet to start into the tablet world, or want something for the kids, then you have to consider this. The price is excellent and it's a great tablet. You won't be dissapointed.

f07d4f561e5c4ec9726d8c8676d74a7f

electronics

the camera is excellent

question: How good is the camera of the nook?, context: For anyone who, like me is new to using an iPod, you will be glad you have this one. The camera works well and luckily, many coffee shops have free WiFi, so you can stay connected just about any time you go out.The only real drawbacks is that you have to have WiFi to place calls. On the plus side, the camera is excellent and the sound quality is also quite good.A good product and it is even better if you have pre-paid telephone service.

How good is the camera of the nook?

On the plus side, the camera is excellent and the sound quality is also quite good.

For anyone who, like me is new to using an iPod, you will be glad you have this one. The camera works well and luckily, many coffee shops have free WiFi, so you can stay connected just about any time you go out.The only real drawbacks is that you have to have WiFi to place calls. On the plus side, the camera is excellent and the sound quality is also quite good.A good product and it is even better if you have pre-paid telephone service.

On the plus side, <hl> the camera is excellent <hl> and the sound quality is also quite good.

For anyone who, like me is new to using an iPod, you will be glad you have this one. The camera works well and luckily, many coffee shops have free WiFi, so you can stay connected just about any time you go out.The only real drawbacks is that you have to have WiFi to place calls. On the plus side, <hl> the camera is excellent <hl> and the sound quality is also quite good.A good product and it is even better if you have pre-paid telephone service.

For anyone who, like me is new to using an iPod, you will be glad you have this one. The camera works well and luckily, many coffee shops have free WiFi, so you can stay connected just about any time you go out. The only real drawbacks is that you have to have WiFi to place calls. <hl> On the plus side, the camera is excellent and the sound quality is also quite good. <hl> A good product and it is even better if you have pre-paid telephone service.

f543116af734d4aa943dc4423f33cc2a

electronics

our phones couldn't get a wifi signal

question: Is the signal good?, context: I'm using this as a range extender only so I can't comment about it's use as a routerWhen I updated to a new router with Time Warner, it was a combo router/modem and the signal was weaker than my previous router. My setup is in the basement. I'd never had a problem before but now our phones couldn't get a wifi signal upstairs. Our laptops could pick up a signal but it was weak and intermittent. So I bought the Securifi Almond to boost our signal. It works like a charm and was extremely easy to setup. I put it in a room directly above the router. The laptops now get full bars and the phones also get a good strong signal from anywhere in the house. I haven't tried using any devices outside yet, but I'm confident it will work there too. Love it!

Is the signal good?

I'd never had a problem before but now our phones couldn't get a wifi signal upstairs.

I'm using this as a range extender only so I can't comment about it's use as a routerWhen I updated to a new router with Time Warner, it was a combo router/modem and the signal was weaker than my previous router. My setup is in the basement. I'd never had a problem before but now our phones couldn't get a wifi signal upstairs. Our laptops could pick up a signal but it was weak and intermittent. So I bought the Securifi Almond to boost our signal. It works like a charm and was extremely easy to setup. I put it in a room directly above the router. The laptops now get full bars and the phones also get a good strong signal from anywhere in the house. I haven't tried using any devices outside yet, but I'm confident it will work there too. Love it!

I'd never had a problem before but now <hl> our phones couldn't get a wifi signal <hl> upstairs.

I'm using this as a range extender only so I can't comment about it's use as a routerWhen I updated to a new router with Time Warner, it was a combo router/modem and the signal was weaker than my previous router. My setup is in the basement. I'd never had a problem before but now <hl> our phones couldn't get a wifi signal <hl> upstairs. Our laptops could pick up a signal but it was weak and intermittent. So I bought the Securifi Almond to boost our signal. It works like a charm and was extremely easy to setup. I put it in a room directly above the router. The laptops now get full bars and the phones also get a good strong signal from anywhere in the house. I haven't tried using any devices outside yet, but I'm confident it will work there too. Love it!

I'm using this as a range extender only so I can't comment about it's use as a routerWhen I updated to a new router with Time Warner, it was a combo router/modem and the signal was weaker than my previous router. My setup is in the basement. <hl> I'd never had a problem before but now our phones couldn't get a wifi signal upstairs. <hl> Our laptops could pick up a signal but it was weak and intermittent. So I bought the Securifi Almond to boost our signal. It works like a charm and was extremely easy to setup. I put it in a room directly above the router. The laptops now get full bars and the phones also get a good strong signal from anywhere in the house. I haven't tried using any devices outside yet, but I'm confident it will work there too. Love it!

c4d54a3c7c8e55bbc8d809de34c8660f

electronics

can't download the drivers

question: Does the company has available driver?, context: I don't yet have a Wireless N router (probably later this year), so I cannot test the Wireless N speeds obtained this adapter, so you will need to check other reviews for that one detail.In my bedroom, the wifi coverage from my router is weak and patchy - as received by the built-in wireless on my laptop - so I thought I would try using this adapter instead.The adapter comes with a USB extension, which I think is very helpful for troublesome locations, as you can experiment with different placements and escape "dead zones".It also includes a small CD with complete drivers. For any other device, the drivers could be on the web... but... if you bought this adapter because your internal wireless adapter is dead, then you can't download the drivers, because you need this device to get on the Internet ! So, it is good that TP-LINK has considered that possibility. Of course, it's also simpler to just insert the CD. The only flaw in this system is that some devices have no CD drive - then you will need to use another laptop or PC to either transfer the CD's contents to a USB flashdrive, or else download them from tp-link.us web site and transfer to a USB flashdrive.Anyway, the install was very easy, and all I had to do was click on my router's ID, enter my password, and it was up and running.The wireless G performance is excellent, and the USB extension allowed me to find a point in my bedroom to position the adapter, that always has good wireless coverage from my router, so everything is cool now for using my laptop in bed. :)So far, I've had good experiences with TP-LINK products. If I change my mind, I'll come back and update the relevant reviews. When I get an N router, I'll update with the N performance too.

Does the company has available driver?

if you bought this adapter because your internal wireless adapter is dead, then you can't download the drivers , because you need this device to get on the Internet !

I don't yet have a Wireless N router (probably later this year), so I cannot test the Wireless N speeds obtained this adapter, so you will need to check other reviews for that one detail.In my bedroom, the wifi coverage from my router is weak and patchy - as received by the built-in wireless on my laptop - so I thought I would try using this adapter instead.The adapter comes with a USB extension, which I think is very helpful for troublesome locations, as you can experiment with different placements and escape "dead zones".It also includes a small CD with complete drivers. For any other device, the drivers could be on the web... but... if you bought this adapter because your internal wireless adapter is dead, then you can't download the drivers, because you need this device to get on the Internet ! So, it is good that TP-LINK has considered that possibility. Of course, it's also simpler to just insert the CD. The only flaw in this system is that some devices have no CD drive - then you will need to use another laptop or PC to either transfer the CD's contents to a USB flashdrive, or else download them from tp-link.us web site and transfer to a USB flashdrive.Anyway, the install was very easy, and all I had to do was click on my router's ID, enter my password, and it was up and running.The wireless G performance is excellent, and the USB extension allowed me to find a point in my bedroom to position the adapter, that always has good wireless coverage from my router, so everything is cool now for using my laptop in bed. :)So far, I've had good experiences with TP-LINK products. If I change my mind, I'll come back and update the relevant reviews. When I get an N router, I'll update with the N performance too.

if you bought this adapter because your internal wireless adapter is dead, then you <hl> can't download the drivers <hl> , because you need this device to get on the Internet !

I don't yet have a Wireless N router (probably later this year), so I cannot test the Wireless N speeds obtained this adapter, so you will need to check other reviews for that one detail.In my bedroom, the wifi coverage from my router is weak and patchy - as received by the built-in wireless on my laptop - so I thought I would try using this adapter instead.The adapter comes with a USB extension, which I think is very helpful for troublesome locations, as you can experiment with different placements and escape "dead zones".It also includes a small CD with complete drivers. For any other device, the drivers could be on the web... but... if you bought this adapter because your internal wireless adapter is dead, then you <hl> can't download the drivers <hl>, because you need this device to get on the Internet ! So, it is good that TP-LINK has considered that possibility. Of course, it's also simpler to just insert the CD. The only flaw in this system is that some devices have no CD drive - then you will need to use another laptop or PC to either transfer the CD's contents to a USB flashdrive, or else download them from tp-link.us web site and transfer to a USB flashdrive.Anyway, the install was very easy, and all I had to do was click on my router's ID, enter my password, and it was up and running.The wireless G performance is excellent, and the USB extension allowed me to find a point in my bedroom to position the adapter, that always has good wireless coverage from my router, so everything is cool now for using my laptop in bed. :)So far, I've had good experiences with TP-LINK products. If I change my mind, I'll come back and update the relevant reviews. When I get an N router, I'll update with the N performance too.

I don't yet have a Wireless N router (probably later this year), so I cannot test the Wireless N speeds obtained this adapter, so you will need to check other reviews for that one detail. In my bedroom, the wifi coverage from my router is weak and patchy - as received by the built-in wireless on my laptop - so I thought I would try using this adapter instead. The adapter comes with a USB extension, which I think is very helpful for troublesome locations, as you can experiment with different placements and escape "dead zones". It also includes a small CD with complete drivers. For any other device, the drivers could be on the web... but... <hl> if you bought this adapter because your internal wireless adapter is dead, then you can't download the drivers , because you need this device to get on the Internet ! <hl> So, it is good that TP-LINK has considered that possibility. Of course, it's also simpler to just insert the CD. The only flaw in this system is that some devices have no CD drive - then you will need to use another laptop or PC to either transfer the CD's contents to a USB flashdrive, or else download them from tp-link.us web site and transfer to a USB flashdrive. Anyway, the install was very easy, and all I had to do was click on my router's ID, enter my password, and it was up and running. The wireless G performance is excellent, and the USB extension allowed me to find a point in my bedroom to position the adapter, that always has good wireless coverage from my router, so everything is cool now for using my laptop in bed. :) So far, I've had good experiences with TP-LINK products. If I change my mind, I'll come back and update the relevant reviews. When I get an N router, I'll update with the N performance too.

2650b549e4fbd1df8b3e1d20aec1ecc3

electronics

start this review and let everyone know

question: How is the quality of review?, context: I want to start this review and let everyone know, Foscam has great customer service.I worked with Ralph Mendez, and I have to say he was an expert when it comes to setting up the camera.My advice , do not try to set up the camera unless you really know how to configure your router and know about computers.I took the easy way, and just called Foscam as soon as I received my camera. Ralph took control of my computer and when he was done my camera was working perfectly.Just a note, sound does not work on an Apple Mac. Foscam advised me they are having some problems and they will be correcting it. Don't spend hours like I did installing the plugin only to find it does not work.I purchased the Foscam pro app for my iPad and iPhone and it works perfectly. Now I can check my home security from a remote location. This app allows you to take clear pictures and video.For an inexpensive camera, it works extremely well.

How is the quality of review?

I want to start this review and let everyone know , Foscam has great customer service.

I want to start this review and let everyone know, Foscam has great customer service.I worked with Ralph Mendez, and I have to say he was an expert when it comes to setting up the camera.My advice , do not try to set up the camera unless you really know how to configure your router and know about computers.I took the easy way, and just called Foscam as soon as I received my camera. Ralph took control of my computer and when he was done my camera was working perfectly.Just a note, sound does not work on an Apple Mac. Foscam advised me they are having some problems and they will be correcting it. Don't spend hours like I did installing the plugin only to find it does not work.I purchased the Foscam pro app for my iPad and iPhone and it works perfectly. Now I can check my home security from a remote location. This app allows you to take clear pictures and video.For an inexpensive camera, it works extremely well.

I want to <hl> start this review and let everyone know <hl> , Foscam has great customer service.

I want to <hl> start this review and let everyone know <hl>, Foscam has great customer service.I worked with Ralph Mendez, and I have to say he was an expert when it comes to setting up the camera.My advice , do not try to set up the camera unless you really know how to configure your router and know about computers.I took the easy way, and just called Foscam as soon as I received my camera. Ralph took control of my computer and when he was done my camera was working perfectly.Just a note, sound does not work on an Apple Mac. Foscam advised me they are having some problems and they will be correcting it. Don't spend hours like I did installing the plugin only to find it does not work.I purchased the Foscam pro app for my iPad and iPhone and it works perfectly. Now I can check my home security from a remote location. This app allows you to take clear pictures and video.For an inexpensive camera, it works extremely well.

<hl> I want to start this review and let everyone know , Foscam has great customer service. <hl> I worked with Ralph Mendez, and I have to say he was an expert when it comes to setting up the camera. My advice , do not try to set up the camera unless you really know how to configure your router and know about computers. I took the easy way, and just called Foscam as soon as I received my camera. Ralph took control of my computer and when he was done my camera was working perfectly. Just a note, sound does not work on an Apple Mac. Foscam advised me they are having some problems and they will be correcting it. Don't spend hours like I did installing the plugin only to find it does not work. I purchased the Foscam pro app for my iPad and iPhone and it works perfectly. Now I can check my home security from a remote location. This app allows you to take clear pictures and video. For an inexpensive camera, it works extremely well.

e01ed0931298f6f15eefe813f71d49b5

electronics

quality speakers are excellently designed

question: How is the speaker clear?, context: Let me preface my review by saying that I am no "audiophile." While I do have electrical engineering knowledge and understand many of the specs that can be compared amongst speaker sets, I cannot discern some of the subtle differences that true audio technicians can. On the other hand, I am also picky about sound quality and am able to immediately notice many aspects of speaker design based on how they affect the sound of a song.With that said, my appraisal of the Klipsch Promedia 2.1 system is a 5-star rating. These high-quality speakers are excellently designed, admirably built, and deliver outstanding sound quality whether they are used with music, movies, or video games.First off, the speakers themselves are wonderful. Featuring strong midrange drivers and bright "horn style" tweeters (a Klipsch tradition), they deliver the full range of frequencies contained in a typical audio track. In this regard they surpass competition such as Logitech, which lacks good midrange abilities. The Klipsch speakers are good enough to draw out flaws in lower quality audio tracks, which can be mildly annoying, but is a great testimony to the quality of the drivers and filters.Now, the subwoofer. I demand GOOD bass from my music. I hate deafeningly loud, boomy bass units that obscure the higher frequencies and irritate everyone within a half mile radius. On the other hand, weak bass drivers that rattle and vibrate or distort when the music is turned up are also an abomination. The Klipsch subwoofer, which runs at 50 watts continuously and can peak at 130 watts, is perfect for in-home audio use. While it probably would not be sufficient to overcome road noise in a car (I have a 150 watt subwoofer there), it is more than ample for a home theater system. I absolutely love the sound of the bass from this thing; while it is ported, which generally makes for boomier bass, the Klipsch unit does deliver very tight, clean bass. A former roommate who was arguably much more of an "audiophile" than myself even commented with approving surprise about the great resonance the sub has at low frequencies. Again, this sub might appear to be weak at only 50 watts RMS, but it is MORE than sufficient. If you turn up the volume loud enough to start distorting or rattling the subwoofer, you will be completely deafened by the satellites.Features are where the Klipsch speakers lose a few points from the overall rating...but not very many. Like most computer speakers, they feature a decently lengthy input cord (1/8" [3.5mm] stereo mini-jack), headphone port, and volume adjustment on the primary satellite.In addition, three features stand out as especially nice. First, there is an additional input port (female 1/8" [3.5mm] stereo mini-jack) which means you can play music and video games at the same time, for example.Next, the speakers are connected to the amplifier/subwoofer unit via detachable 2-wire speaker cords, NOT hardwired cords. This means you have a lot of flexibility in the placement of the units; additionally, the included wires are very long. If they aren't long enough, you could also solder an extra length of ordinary speaker wire to the amplifier end because they simply clip into place. The satellite ends have 1/8" jacks on them which plug firmly into the back of the satellites.Lastly, the subwoofer can be fully adjusted via a knob on the primary satellite, meaning you can turn it down or even off without affecting the volume of the music. This is great in apartments and dorms where the bass is OK during the day but must be toned down at night to avoid disturbing people.The one feature of the set that is NOT a plus would be the placement of the power switch. In order to prevent that awful popping noise that occurs when you power up a speaker set remotely (such as by flipping the switch on a power strip), you'll want to use the unit's built-in power switch. Unfortunately, this is located on the back lower part of the amplifier/subwoofer, under the wiring connections and generally in a place where you will have trouble reaching. Usually, the sub gets tucked away under a desk or in a corner, and thus the switch location is rather terrible. Logitech systems, for example, often have a remote or hardwired control pod which includes power and volume controls.Build quality on the speakers is also a plus. The subwoofer is sturdy and rugged MDF, with a quality black coating and a firmly attached rear amplifier panel. The satellites are injection molded plastic, but it is thick and strong, and the bases (which can be removed for optional wall mounting) are coated metal. I have had the speakers for several years now and they have never once acted up on me or required repair.All in all, the Klipsch Promedia 2.1 set is a phenomenal, spectacular set of speakers for a relatively cheap, 2.1 style unit that was designed with computer audio in mind. With a few adapters, you can easily use this with your TV, XBox, and many other devices, as I currently do. Again, larger home audio units will provide better and louder sound, but these will also cost a great deal more. I would highly recommend these speakers to anyone who needs a compact setup but demands good quality sound.

How is the speaker clear?

These high- quality speakers are excellently designed , admirably built, and deliver outstanding sound quality whether they are used with music, movies, or video games.

Let me preface my review by saying that I am no "audiophile." While I do have electrical engineering knowledge and understand many of the specs that can be compared amongst speaker sets, I cannot discern some of the subtle differences that true audio technicians can. On the other hand, I am also picky about sound quality and am able to immediately notice many aspects of speaker design based on how they affect the sound of a song.With that said, my appraisal of the Klipsch Promedia 2.1 system is a 5-star rating. These high-quality speakers are excellently designed, admirably built, and deliver outstanding sound quality whether they are used with music, movies, or video games.First off, the speakers themselves are wonderful. Featuring strong midrange drivers and bright "horn style" tweeters (a Klipsch tradition), they deliver the full range of frequencies contained in a typical audio track. In this regard they surpass competition such as Logitech, which lacks good midrange abilities. The Klipsch speakers are good enough to draw out flaws in lower quality audio tracks, which can be mildly annoying, but is a great testimony to the quality of the drivers and filters.Now, the subwoofer. I demand GOOD bass from my music. I hate deafeningly loud, boomy bass units that obscure the higher frequencies and irritate everyone within a half mile radius. On the other hand, weak bass drivers that rattle and vibrate or distort when the music is turned up are also an abomination. The Klipsch subwoofer, which runs at 50 watts continuously and can peak at 130 watts, is perfect for in-home audio use. While it probably would not be sufficient to overcome road noise in a car (I have a 150 watt subwoofer there), it is more than ample for a home theater system. I absolutely love the sound of the bass from this thing; while it is ported, which generally makes for boomier bass, the Klipsch unit does deliver very tight, clean bass. A former roommate who was arguably much more of an "audiophile" than myself even commented with approving surprise about the great resonance the sub has at low frequencies. Again, this sub might appear to be weak at only 50 watts RMS, but it is MORE than sufficient. If you turn up the volume loud enough to start distorting or rattling the subwoofer, you will be completely deafened by the satellites.Features are where the Klipsch speakers lose a few points from the overall rating...but not very many. Like most computer speakers, they feature a decently lengthy input cord (1/8" [3.5mm] stereo mini-jack), headphone port, and volume adjustment on the primary satellite.In addition, three features stand out as especially nice. First, there is an additional input port (female 1/8" [3.5mm] stereo mini-jack) which means you can play music and video games at the same time, for example.Next, the speakers are connected to the amplifier/subwoofer unit via detachable 2-wire speaker cords, NOT hardwired cords. This means you have a lot of flexibility in the placement of the units; additionally, the included wires are very long. If they aren't long enough, you could also solder an extra length of ordinary speaker wire to the amplifier end because they simply clip into place. The satellite ends have 1/8" jacks on them which plug firmly into the back of the satellites.Lastly, the subwoofer can be fully adjusted via a knob on the primary satellite, meaning you can turn it down or even off without affecting the volume of the music. This is great in apartments and dorms where the bass is OK during the day but must be toned down at night to avoid disturbing people.The one feature of the set that is NOT a plus would be the placement of the power switch. In order to prevent that awful popping noise that occurs when you power up a speaker set remotely (such as by flipping the switch on a power strip), you'll want to use the unit's built-in power switch. Unfortunately, this is located on the back lower part of the amplifier/subwoofer, under the wiring connections and generally in a place where you will have trouble reaching. Usually, the sub gets tucked away under a desk or in a corner, and thus the switch location is rather terrible. Logitech systems, for example, often have a remote or hardwired control pod which includes power and volume controls.Build quality on the speakers is also a plus. The subwoofer is sturdy and rugged MDF, with a quality black coating and a firmly attached rear amplifier panel. The satellites are injection molded plastic, but it is thick and strong, and the bases (which can be removed for optional wall mounting) are coated metal. I have had the speakers for several years now and they have never once acted up on me or required repair.All in all, the Klipsch Promedia 2.1 set is a phenomenal, spectacular set of speakers for a relatively cheap, 2.1 style unit that was designed with computer audio in mind. With a few adapters, you can easily use this with your TV, XBox, and many other devices, as I currently do. Again, larger home audio units will provide better and louder sound, but these will also cost a great deal more. I would highly recommend these speakers to anyone who needs a compact setup but demands good quality sound.

These high- <hl> quality speakers are excellently designed <hl> , admirably built, and deliver outstanding sound quality whether they are used with music, movies, or video games.

Let me preface my review by saying that I am no "audiophile." While I do have electrical engineering knowledge and understand many of the specs that can be compared amongst speaker sets, I cannot discern some of the subtle differences that true audio technicians can. On the other hand, I am also picky about sound quality and am able to immediately notice many aspects of speaker design based on how they affect the sound of a song.With that said, my appraisal of the Klipsch Promedia 2.1 system is a 5-star rating. These high-<hl> quality speakers are excellently designed <hl>, admirably built, and deliver outstanding sound quality whether they are used with music, movies, or video games.First off, the speakers themselves are wonderful. Featuring strong midrange drivers and bright "horn style" tweeters (a Klipsch tradition), they deliver the full range of frequencies contained in a typical audio track. In this regard they surpass competition such as Logitech, which lacks good midrange abilities. The Klipsch speakers are good enough to draw out flaws in lower quality audio tracks, which can be mildly annoying, but is a great testimony to the quality of the drivers and filters.Now, the subwoofer. I demand GOOD bass from my music. I hate deafeningly loud, boomy bass units that obscure the higher frequencies and irritate everyone within a half mile radius. On the other hand, weak bass drivers that rattle and vibrate or distort when the music is turned up are also an abomination. The Klipsch subwoofer, which runs at 50 watts continuously and can peak at 130 watts, is perfect for in-home audio use. While it probably would not be sufficient to overcome road noise in a car (I have a 150 watt subwoofer there), it is more than ample for a home theater system. I absolutely love the sound of the bass from this thing; while it is ported, which generally makes for boomier bass, the Klipsch unit does deliver very tight, clean bass. A former roommate who was arguably much more of an "audiophile" than myself even commented with approving surprise about the great resonance the sub has at low frequencies. Again, this sub might appear to be weak at only 50 watts RMS, but it is MORE than sufficient. If you turn up the volume loud enough to start distorting or rattling the subwoofer, you will be completely deafened by the satellites.Features are where the Klipsch speakers lose a few points from the overall rating...but not very many. Like most computer speakers, they feature a decently lengthy input cord (1/8" [3.5mm] stereo mini-jack), headphone port, and volume adjustment on the primary satellite.In addition, three features stand out as especially nice. First, there is an additional input port (female 1/8" [3.5mm] stereo mini-jack) which means you can play music and video games at the same time, for example.Next, the speakers are connected to the amplifier/subwoofer unit via detachable 2-wire speaker cords, NOT hardwired cords. This means you have a lot of flexibility in the placement of the units; additionally, the included wires are very long. If they aren't long enough, you could also solder an extra length of ordinary speaker wire to the amplifier end because they simply clip into place. The satellite ends have 1/8" jacks on them which plug firmly into the back of the satellites.Lastly, the subwoofer can be fully adjusted via a knob on the primary satellite, meaning you can turn it down or even off without affecting the volume of the music. This is great in apartments and dorms where the bass is OK during the day but must be toned down at night to avoid disturbing people.The one feature of the set that is NOT a plus would be the placement of the power switch. In order to prevent that awful popping noise that occurs when you power up a speaker set remotely (such as by flipping the switch on a power strip), you'll want to use the unit's built-in power switch. Unfortunately, this is located on the back lower part of the amplifier/subwoofer, under the wiring connections and generally in a place where you will have trouble reaching. Usually, the sub gets tucked away under a desk or in a corner, and thus the switch location is rather terrible. Logitech systems, for example, often have a remote or hardwired control pod which includes power and volume controls.Build quality on the speakers is also a plus. The subwoofer is sturdy and rugged MDF, with a quality black coating and a firmly attached rear amplifier panel. The satellites are injection molded plastic, but it is thick and strong, and the bases (which can be removed for optional wall mounting) are coated metal. I have had the speakers for several years now and they have never once acted up on me or required repair.All in all, the Klipsch Promedia 2.1 set is a phenomenal, spectacular set of speakers for a relatively cheap, 2.1 style unit that was designed with computer audio in mind. With a few adapters, you can easily use this with your TV, XBox, and many other devices, as I currently do. Again, larger home audio units will provide better and louder sound, but these will also cost a great deal more. I would highly recommend these speakers to anyone who needs a compact setup but demands good quality sound.

Let me preface my review by saying that I am no "audiophile." While I do have electrical engineering knowledge and understand many of the specs that can be compared amongst speaker sets, I cannot discern some of the subtle differences that true audio technicians can. On the other hand, I am also picky about sound quality and am able to immediately notice many aspects of speaker design based on how they affect the sound of a song. With that said, my appraisal of the Klipsch Promedia 2.1 system is a 5-star rating. <hl> These high- quality speakers are excellently designed , admirably built, and deliver outstanding sound quality whether they are used with music, movies, or video games. <hl> First off, the speakers themselves are wonderful. Featuring strong midrange drivers and bright "horn style" tweeters (a Klipsch tradition), they deliver the full range of frequencies contained in a typical audio track. In this regard they surpass competition such as Logitech, which lacks good midrange abilities. The Klipsch speakers are good enough to draw out flaws in lower quality audio tracks, which can be mildly annoying, but is a great testimony to the quality of the drivers and filters. Now, the subwoofer. I demand GOOD bass from my music. I hate deafeningly loud, boomy bass units that obscure the higher frequencies and irritate everyone within a half mile radius. On the other hand, weak bass drivers that rattle and vibrate or distort when the music is turned up are also an abomination. The Klipsch subwoofer, which runs at 50 watts continuously and can peak at 130 watts, is perfect for in-home audio use. While it probably would not be sufficient to overcome road noise in a car (I have a 150 watt subwoofer there), it is more than ample for a home theater system. I absolutely love the sound of the bass from this thing; while it is ported, which generally makes for boomier bass, the Klipsch unit does deliver very tight, clean bass. A former roommate who was arguably much more of an "audiophile" than myself even commented with approving surprise about the great resonance the sub has at low frequencies. Again, this sub might appear to be weak at only 50 watts RMS, but it is MORE than sufficient. If you turn up the volume loud enough to start distorting or rattling the subwoofer, you will be completely deafened by the satellites. Features are where the Klipsch speakers lose a few points from the overall rating...but not very many. Like most computer speakers, they feature a decently lengthy input cord (1/8" [3.5mm] stereo mini-jack), headphone port, and volume adjustment on the primary satellite. In addition, three features stand out as especially nice. First, there is an additional input port (female 1/8" [3.5mm] stereo mini-jack) which means you can play music and video games at the same time, for example. Next, the speakers are connected to the amplifier/subwoofer unit via detachable 2-wire speaker cords, NOT hardwired cords. This means you have a lot of flexibility in the placement of the units; additionally, the included wires are very long. If they aren't long enough, you could also solder an extra length of ordinary speaker wire to the amplifier end because they simply clip into place. The satellite ends have 1/8" jacks on them which plug firmly into the back of the satellites. Lastly, the subwoofer can be fully adjusted via a knob on the primary satellite, meaning you can turn it down or even off without affecting the volume of the music. This is great in apartments and dorms where the bass is OK during the day but must be toned down at night to avoid disturbing people. The one feature of the set that is NOT a plus would be the placement of the power switch. In order to prevent that awful popping noise that occurs when you power up a speaker set remotely (such as by flipping the switch on a power strip), you'll want to use the unit's built-in power switch. Unfortunately, this is located on the back lower part of the amplifier/subwoofer, under the wiring connections and generally in a place where you will have trouble reaching. Usually, the sub gets tucked away under a desk or in a corner, and thus the switch location is rather terrible. Logitech systems, for example, often have a remote or hardwired control pod which includes power and volume controls. Build quality on the speakers is also a plus. The subwoofer is sturdy and rugged MDF, with a quality black coating and a firmly attached rear amplifier panel. The satellites are injection molded plastic, but it is thick and strong, and the bases (which can be removed for optional wall mounting) are coated metal. I have had the speakers for several years now and they have never once acted up on me or required repair. All in all, the Klipsch Promedia 2.1 set is a phenomenal, spectacular set of speakers for a relatively cheap, 2.1 style unit that was designed with computer audio in mind. With a few adapters, you can easily use this with your TV, XBox, and many other devices, as I currently do. Again, larger home audio units will provide better and louder sound, but these will also cost a great deal more. I would highly recommend these speakers to anyone who needs a compact setup but demands good quality sound.

2f05da2ec23c59dfa4c25f5a12819198

electronics

The Trackman Wheel, unfortunately, had a few issues. I didn't mind that it was wired. I did, however, find myself frustrated with the lack of forward and back buttons.

question: What do you think about each button?, context: I'm a huge fan of gaming in general. Doesn't matter if it's PC or console, it's something I enjoy. The one thing I never really felt at home with, however, were mice. Unfortunately, I could never find a mouse that really felt 'right', or didn't hurt my hand after prolonged use. The mousing 'motion' is just not something that, well, meshes with me. I've been through dozens of Logitech and Razer mice, and eventually gave up. I knew what I wanted - Thumb control, like playing with a controller. I eventually found myself looking into a trackball, and settled on the old "red ball" trackman wheel.The Trackman Wheel, unfortunately, had a few issues. I didn't mind that it was wired. I did, however, find myself frustrated with the lack of forward and back buttons. Second of all, the optical DPI was just way too low for precise aiming in FPS games. If I remember correctly someone rated it at 400dpi, which is just unacceptable. A solid trackball, but these two little errors sent me slinking back to my trusty Razer Lachesis.I actually wrote Logitech an email describing a "gaming trackball" with laser tracking. I highly doubt they ever read my email, but they actually released the exact product I wished for, so I jumped right on it!Unfortunately, I have yet to get an invite to the Vine program, so I actually had to dish out the 49.99 myself. I don't regret it!First of all, the wireless technology in this trackball is certainly up to date. Latency is not an issue at all, and having the option to be wireless is certainly a plus. I do wish it came with a detachable cable in case you didn't want to deal with the battery, but then again, the single AA battery this unit requires promises to last up to 18 months. If this is true then I cannot mark this product down. I've had it for two weeks now, and so far, so good. I am running Windows 7.The addition of back and forward buttons answers the plea that many people have been crying for ever since the old Microsoft Trackball Optical was discontinued: A fully featured thumb-controlled trackball that doesn't cost 400 dollars due to becoming a collectors item.To make things better, most people always agreed that the Trackman series had better ergonomics than the MS Trackball, however the lack of buttons was the big deal breaker. It seems that most companies focus on their palm/prominent fingered trackballs and totally ignore the thumb-based ones.The M570 is the answer to all these problems, well, and more.I was quite shocked and excited when I heard that it was using a laser sensor. I am unsure of the DPI since Logitech doesn't seem to release that information, but it's certainly much higher than the Trackman Wheel, which makes it a godsend. The accuracy is top notch, the glide of the ball is just right, and the buttons feel solid. Nevermind the comfort of the ball in general. There are no problems there. I really cannot find anything wrong with this ball.If I was going to add anything it would be the following: Actual published DPI rating, Additional buttons for on-the-fly DPI adjustment, and finally one of those awesome Hyperscroll wheels that Logitech has released on their gaming mice.It seems that Logitech is even downplaying the fact that this ball is laser-tracked. The question is: Why? I know I am not the only person who games with a trackball, and while many people have settled with Kensington's balls for the task, I have been waiting out for an appropriate thumb-controlled trackball. Perhaps the M570 is just a test before they release the true "gaming grade" trackball? Or will this be the final hurrah in the trackball world?As of writing this, the M570 is undoubtedly the best Trackball on the market, not only for gaming but also casual use. Despite the few features that could have been included, the addition of laser tracking and two control buttons make it tough to beat and fills a huge void in the market. One can only hope this device's success convinces Logitech to continue further with their trackball efforts. Until then, the M570 will be my ball of choice for headshots.

What do you think about each button?

The Trackman Wheel, unfortunately, had a few issues. I didn't mind that it was wired. I did, however, find myself frustrated with the lack of forward and back buttons. Second of all, the optical DPI was just way too low for precise aiming in FPS games.

I'm a huge fan of gaming in general. Doesn't matter if it's PC or console, it's something I enjoy. The one thing I never really felt at home with, however, were mice. Unfortunately, I could never find a mouse that really felt 'right', or didn't hurt my hand after prolonged use. The mousing 'motion' is just not something that, well, meshes with me. I've been through dozens of Logitech and Razer mice, and eventually gave up. I knew what I wanted - Thumb control, like playing with a controller. I eventually found myself looking into a trackball, and settled on the old "red ball" trackman wheel.The Trackman Wheel, unfortunately, had a few issues. I didn't mind that it was wired. I did, however, find myself frustrated with the lack of forward and back buttons. Second of all, the optical DPI was just way too low for precise aiming in FPS games. If I remember correctly someone rated it at 400dpi, which is just unacceptable. A solid trackball, but these two little errors sent me slinking back to my trusty Razer Lachesis.I actually wrote Logitech an email describing a "gaming trackball" with laser tracking. I highly doubt they ever read my email, but they actually released the exact product I wished for, so I jumped right on it!Unfortunately, I have yet to get an invite to the Vine program, so I actually had to dish out the 49.99 myself. I don't regret it!First of all, the wireless technology in this trackball is certainly up to date. Latency is not an issue at all, and having the option to be wireless is certainly a plus. I do wish it came with a detachable cable in case you didn't want to deal with the battery, but then again, the single AA battery this unit requires promises to last up to 18 months. If this is true then I cannot mark this product down. I've had it for two weeks now, and so far, so good. I am running Windows 7.The addition of back and forward buttons answers the plea that many people have been crying for ever since the old Microsoft Trackball Optical was discontinued: A fully featured thumb-controlled trackball that doesn't cost 400 dollars due to becoming a collectors item.To make things better, most people always agreed that the Trackman series had better ergonomics than the MS Trackball, however the lack of buttons was the big deal breaker. It seems that most companies focus on their palm/prominent fingered trackballs and totally ignore the thumb-based ones.The M570 is the answer to all these problems, well, and more.I was quite shocked and excited when I heard that it was using a laser sensor. I am unsure of the DPI since Logitech doesn't seem to release that information, but it's certainly much higher than the Trackman Wheel, which makes it a godsend. The accuracy is top notch, the glide of the ball is just right, and the buttons feel solid. Nevermind the comfort of the ball in general. There are no problems there. I really cannot find anything wrong with this ball.If I was going to add anything it would be the following: Actual published DPI rating, Additional buttons for on-the-fly DPI adjustment, and finally one of those awesome Hyperscroll wheels that Logitech has released on their gaming mice.It seems that Logitech is even downplaying the fact that this ball is laser-tracked. The question is: Why? I know I am not the only person who games with a trackball, and while many people have settled with Kensington's balls for the task, I have been waiting out for an appropriate thumb-controlled trackball. Perhaps the M570 is just a test before they release the true "gaming grade" trackball? Or will this be the final hurrah in the trackball world?As of writing this, the M570 is undoubtedly the best Trackball on the market, not only for gaming but also casual use. Despite the few features that could have been included, the addition of laser tracking and two control buttons make it tough to beat and fills a huge void in the market. One can only hope this device's success convinces Logitech to continue further with their trackball efforts. Until then, the M570 will be my ball of choice for headshots.

<hl> The Trackman Wheel, unfortunately, had a few issues. I didn't mind that it was wired. I did, however, find myself frustrated with the lack of forward and back buttons. <hl> Second of all, the optical DPI was just way too low for precise aiming in FPS games.

I'm a huge fan of gaming in general. Doesn't matter if it's PC or console, it's something I enjoy. The one thing I never really felt at home with, however, were mice. Unfortunately, I could never find a mouse that really felt 'right', or didn't hurt my hand after prolonged use. The mousing 'motion' is just not something that, well, meshes with me. I've been through dozens of Logitech and Razer mice, and eventually gave up. I knew what I wanted - Thumb control, like playing with a controller. I eventually found myself looking into a trackball, and settled on the old "red ball" trackman wheel.<hl> The Trackman Wheel, unfortunately, had a few issues. I didn't mind that it was wired. I did, however, find myself frustrated with the lack of forward and back buttons. <hl> Second of all, the optical DPI was just way too low for precise aiming in FPS games. If I remember correctly someone rated it at 400dpi, which is just unacceptable. A solid trackball, but these two little errors sent me slinking back to my trusty Razer Lachesis.I actually wrote Logitech an email describing a "gaming trackball" with laser tracking. I highly doubt they ever read my email, but they actually released the exact product I wished for, so I jumped right on it!Unfortunately, I have yet to get an invite to the Vine program, so I actually had to dish out the 49.99 myself. I don't regret it!First of all, the wireless technology in this trackball is certainly up to date. Latency is not an issue at all, and having the option to be wireless is certainly a plus. I do wish it came with a detachable cable in case you didn't want to deal with the battery, but then again, the single AA battery this unit requires promises to last up to 18 months. If this is true then I cannot mark this product down. I've had it for two weeks now, and so far, so good. I am running Windows 7.The addition of back and forward buttons answers the plea that many people have been crying for ever since the old Microsoft Trackball Optical was discontinued: A fully featured thumb-controlled trackball that doesn't cost 400 dollars due to becoming a collectors item.To make things better, most people always agreed that the Trackman series had better ergonomics than the MS Trackball, however the lack of buttons was the big deal breaker. It seems that most companies focus on their palm/prominent fingered trackballs and totally ignore the thumb-based ones.The M570 is the answer to all these problems, well, and more.I was quite shocked and excited when I heard that it was using a laser sensor. I am unsure of the DPI since Logitech doesn't seem to release that information, but it's certainly much higher than the Trackman Wheel, which makes it a godsend. The accuracy is top notch, the glide of the ball is just right, and the buttons feel solid. Nevermind the comfort of the ball in general. There are no problems there. I really cannot find anything wrong with this ball.If I was going to add anything it would be the following: Actual published DPI rating, Additional buttons for on-the-fly DPI adjustment, and finally one of those awesome Hyperscroll wheels that Logitech has released on their gaming mice.It seems that Logitech is even downplaying the fact that this ball is laser-tracked. The question is: Why? I know I am not the only person who games with a trackball, and while many people have settled with Kensington's balls for the task, I have been waiting out for an appropriate thumb-controlled trackball. Perhaps the M570 is just a test before they release the true "gaming grade" trackball? Or will this be the final hurrah in the trackball world?As of writing this, the M570 is undoubtedly the best Trackball on the market, not only for gaming but also casual use. Despite the few features that could have been included, the addition of laser tracking and two control buttons make it tough to beat and fills a huge void in the market. One can only hope this device's success convinces Logitech to continue further with their trackball efforts. Until then, the M570 will be my ball of choice for headshots.

I'm a huge fan of gaming in general. Doesn't matter if it's PC or console, it's something I enjoy. The one thing I never really felt at home with, however, were mice. Unfortunately, I could never find a mouse that really felt 'right', or didn't hurt my hand after prolonged use. The mousing 'motion' is just not something that, well, meshes with me. I've been through dozens of Logitech and Razer mice, and eventually gave up. I knew what I wanted - Thumb control, like playing with a controller. I eventually found myself looking into a trackball, and settled on the old "red ball" trackman wheel. <hl> The Trackman Wheel, unfortunately, had a few issues. I didn't mind that it was wired. I did, however, find myself frustrated with the lack of forward and back buttons. Second of all, the optical DPI was just way too low for precise aiming in FPS games. <hl> If I remember correctly someone rated it at 400dpi, which is just unacceptable. A solid trackball, but these two little errors sent me slinking back to my trusty Razer Lachesis. I actually wrote Logitech an email describing a "gaming trackball" with laser tracking. I highly doubt they ever read my email, but they actually released the exact product I wished for, so I jumped right on it!Unfortunately, I have yet to get an invite to the Vine program, so I actually had to dish out the 49.99 myself. I don't regret it!First of all, the wireless technology in this trackball is certainly up to date. Latency is not an issue at all, and having the option to be wireless is certainly a plus. I do wish it came with a detachable cable in case you didn't want to deal with the battery, but then again, the single AA battery this unit requires promises to last up to 18 months. If this is true then I cannot mark this product down. I've had it for two weeks now, and so far, so good. I am running Windows 7.The addition of back and forward buttons answers the plea that many people have been crying for ever since the old Microsoft Trackball Optical was discontinued: A fully featured thumb-controlled trackball that doesn't cost 400 dollars due to becoming a collectors item. To make things better, most people always agreed that the Trackman series had better ergonomics than the MS Trackball, however the lack of buttons was the big deal breaker. It seems that most companies focus on their palm/prominent fingered trackballs and totally ignore the thumb-based ones. The M570 is the answer to all these problems, well, and more. I was quite shocked and excited when I heard that it was using a laser sensor. I am unsure of the DPI since Logitech doesn't seem to release that information, but it's certainly much higher than the Trackman Wheel, which makes it a godsend. The accuracy is top notch, the glide of the ball is just right, and the buttons feel solid. Nevermind the comfort of the ball in general. There are no problems there. I really cannot find anything wrong with this ball. If I was going to add anything it would be the following: Actual published DPI rating, Additional buttons for on-the-fly DPI adjustment, and finally one of those awesome Hyperscroll wheels that Logitech has released on their gaming mice. It seems that Logitech is even downplaying the fact that this ball is laser-tracked. The question is: Why? I know I am not the only person who games with a trackball, and while many people have settled with Kensington's balls for the task, I have been waiting out for an appropriate thumb-controlled trackball. Perhaps the M570 is just a test before they release the true "gaming grade" trackball? Or will this be the final hurrah in the trackball world?As of writing this, the M570 is undoubtedly the best Trackball on the market, not only for gaming but also casual use. Despite the few features that could have been included, the addition of laser tracking and two control buttons make it tough to beat and fills a huge void in the market. One can only hope this device's success convinces Logitech to continue further with their trackball efforts. Until then, the M570 will be my ball of choice for headshots.

f1ecd1ee7de201cfb82203a1f0ebf82a

electronics

The zoom, compactness, and fantastic video implementation are wonderful

question: How is setting?, context: It looks like this model is phasing out anyway, but this is just a word to the obsessive shoppers who are spending countless hours examining reviews and painstakingly weighing the differences between this and the FZ40 (as I did)...Many people have said that the FZ35 images have less noise than the FZ40. That may be true, but the FZ35 is still pretty noisy, even at low ISO's, so the difference is probably minimal. They are sharp, detailed and well-exposed, but the grain is noticeable at larger sizes...doesn't even compete with a first generation Canon Rebel on that front. So don't think the choice is between a camera with minimal noise and another with a lot of noise; neither of them is stellar. If I were to make the decision again, I would go with the FZ40 because of the improved features and increased zoom.Other than that, it's still a great camera and I use it all the time. The zoom, compactness, and fantastic video implementation are wonderful. Just don't pixel-peep at 100% or you'll be disappointed.

How is setting?

The zoom, compactness, and fantastic video implementation are wonderful .

It looks like this model is phasing out anyway, but this is just a word to the obsessive shoppers who are spending countless hours examining reviews and painstakingly weighing the differences between this and the FZ40 (as I did)...Many people have said that the FZ35 images have less noise than the FZ40. That may be true, but the FZ35 is still pretty noisy, even at low ISO's, so the difference is probably minimal. They are sharp, detailed and well-exposed, but the grain is noticeable at larger sizes...doesn't even compete with a first generation Canon Rebel on that front. So don't think the choice is between a camera with minimal noise and another with a lot of noise; neither of them is stellar. If I were to make the decision again, I would go with the FZ40 because of the improved features and increased zoom.Other than that, it's still a great camera and I use it all the time. The zoom, compactness, and fantastic video implementation are wonderful. Just don't pixel-peep at 100% or you'll be disappointed.

<hl> The zoom, compactness, and fantastic video implementation are wonderful <hl> .

It looks like this model is phasing out anyway, but this is just a word to the obsessive shoppers who are spending countless hours examining reviews and painstakingly weighing the differences between this and the FZ40 (as I did)...Many people have said that the FZ35 images have less noise than the FZ40. That may be true, but the FZ35 is still pretty noisy, even at low ISO's, so the difference is probably minimal. They are sharp, detailed and well-exposed, but the grain is noticeable at larger sizes...doesn't even compete with a first generation Canon Rebel on that front. So don't think the choice is between a camera with minimal noise and another with a lot of noise; neither of them is stellar. If I were to make the decision again, I would go with the FZ40 because of the improved features and increased zoom.Other than that, it's still a great camera and I use it all the time. <hl> The zoom, compactness, and fantastic video implementation are wonderful <hl>. Just don't pixel-peep at 100% or you'll be disappointed.

It looks like this model is phasing out anyway, but this is just a word to the obsessive shoppers who are spending countless hours examining reviews and painstakingly weighing the differences between this and the FZ40 (as I did)... Many people have said that the FZ35 images have less noise than the FZ40. That may be true, but the FZ35 is still pretty noisy, even at low ISO's, so the difference is probably minimal. They are sharp, detailed and well-exposed, but the grain is noticeable at larger sizes...doesn't even compete with a first generation Canon Rebel on that front. So don't think the choice is between a camera with minimal noise and another with a lot of noise; neither of them is stellar. If I were to make the decision again, I would go with the FZ40 because of the improved features and increased zoom. Other than that, it's still a great camera and I use it all the time. <hl> The zoom, compactness, and fantastic video implementation are wonderful . <hl> Just don't pixel-peep at 100% or you'll be disappointed.

69287ffbb7f75fe07a2214d26c6f5a05

electronics

This camera is stacked with features and takes fantastic pictures

question: How describe the camera?, context: Like many people I spent nearly three months trying to determine which camera to purchase. I looked at the Nikon D90 and D7000; as well as, the Canon T2i. In the end I felt the best value was the Canon 60D. I could go on and on about the camera but most importantly I can say I'm very happy with my decision. This camera is stacked with features and takes fantastic pictures. I honestly don't think you can go wrong with any of the cameras but for me it came down to pixels, pentaprism, autofocus, LCD, and price. I have always been a Canon guy (A1, two Rebels) but this was my first digital and I was open to either company. In the end my view was that Canon is a better value at the lower end and Nikon is a better product at the high end.In terms of my decision to go with the 60D over the T2i I just felt that the extra features were going to get me better pictures and ultimately make me happier in the long term. These cameras are big so while the Rebel is smaller it is still a substantial camera with the lens on it. You have to be committed to carrying around a camera of this size. From a price perspective, the 60D was an additional $200. That gets you a better view finder and better focusing. These two things can make a huge difference between getting the best possible picture.Having used a high end film camera since I was 15 I find the controls to be very intuitive. There is a lot there so it will still take me some time to learn all the features but I'm able to get off and running very quickly. When you look at the reviews most of the issues are overstated. The majority of pictures with this camera will be taken in one of the standard shooting modes. The rest of the settings are nice to have but are hard to fiddle with when you are just concentrating on getting pictures taken of a brithday or a sporting event. There's one rule that seems to stand the test of time - the 80-20 rule. 80% of the people will use 20% of the functionality of this camera. The other 20% may use 80% but it will be less than 20% of the time.Lastly, I wouldn't get too caught up with the lenses either. This is a good all around lens if you can have only one lens. Again, 80% of the people will rarely change a lens. There are better lenses but most of us just won't notice the difference. I do believe that image stabilization is a must. In my mind it is the single biggest benefit to the average user. Sure some lenses focus faster or are better in low light but most of us can just hold down the shutter and use a flash.Get the camera and have some fun. There will be plenty of time to upgrade lenses, flashes, etc. You'll never be able to get back the pictures you miss.

How describe the camera?

This camera is stacked with features and takes fantastic pictures .

Like many people I spent nearly three months trying to determine which camera to purchase. I looked at the Nikon D90 and D7000; as well as, the Canon T2i. In the end I felt the best value was the Canon 60D. I could go on and on about the camera but most importantly I can say I'm very happy with my decision. This camera is stacked with features and takes fantastic pictures. I honestly don't think you can go wrong with any of the cameras but for me it came down to pixels, pentaprism, autofocus, LCD, and price. I have always been a Canon guy (A1, two Rebels) but this was my first digital and I was open to either company. In the end my view was that Canon is a better value at the lower end and Nikon is a better product at the high end.In terms of my decision to go with the 60D over the T2i I just felt that the extra features were going to get me better pictures and ultimately make me happier in the long term. These cameras are big so while the Rebel is smaller it is still a substantial camera with the lens on it. You have to be committed to carrying around a camera of this size. From a price perspective, the 60D was an additional $200. That gets you a better view finder and better focusing. These two things can make a huge difference between getting the best possible picture.Having used a high end film camera since I was 15 I find the controls to be very intuitive. There is a lot there so it will still take me some time to learn all the features but I'm able to get off and running very quickly. When you look at the reviews most of the issues are overstated. The majority of pictures with this camera will be taken in one of the standard shooting modes. The rest of the settings are nice to have but are hard to fiddle with when you are just concentrating on getting pictures taken of a brithday or a sporting event. There's one rule that seems to stand the test of time - the 80-20 rule. 80% of the people will use 20% of the functionality of this camera. The other 20% may use 80% but it will be less than 20% of the time.Lastly, I wouldn't get too caught up with the lenses either. This is a good all around lens if you can have only one lens. Again, 80% of the people will rarely change a lens. There are better lenses but most of us just won't notice the difference. I do believe that image stabilization is a must. In my mind it is the single biggest benefit to the average user. Sure some lenses focus faster or are better in low light but most of us can just hold down the shutter and use a flash.Get the camera and have some fun. There will be plenty of time to upgrade lenses, flashes, etc. You'll never be able to get back the pictures you miss.

<hl> This camera is stacked with features and takes fantastic pictures <hl> .

Like many people I spent nearly three months trying to determine which camera to purchase. I looked at the Nikon D90 and D7000; as well as, the Canon T2i. In the end I felt the best value was the Canon 60D. I could go on and on about the camera but most importantly I can say I'm very happy with my decision. <hl> This camera is stacked with features and takes fantastic pictures <hl>. I honestly don't think you can go wrong with any of the cameras but for me it came down to pixels, pentaprism, autofocus, LCD, and price. I have always been a Canon guy (A1, two Rebels) but this was my first digital and I was open to either company. In the end my view was that Canon is a better value at the lower end and Nikon is a better product at the high end.In terms of my decision to go with the 60D over the T2i I just felt that the extra features were going to get me better pictures and ultimately make me happier in the long term. These cameras are big so while the Rebel is smaller it is still a substantial camera with the lens on it. You have to be committed to carrying around a camera of this size. From a price perspective, the 60D was an additional $200. That gets you a better view finder and better focusing. These two things can make a huge difference between getting the best possible picture.Having used a high end film camera since I was 15 I find the controls to be very intuitive. There is a lot there so it will still take me some time to learn all the features but I'm able to get off and running very quickly. When you look at the reviews most of the issues are overstated. The majority of pictures with this camera will be taken in one of the standard shooting modes. The rest of the settings are nice to have but are hard to fiddle with when you are just concentrating on getting pictures taken of a brithday or a sporting event. There's one rule that seems to stand the test of time - the 80-20 rule. 80% of the people will use 20% of the functionality of this camera. The other 20% may use 80% but it will be less than 20% of the time.Lastly, I wouldn't get too caught up with the lenses either. This is a good all around lens if you can have only one lens. Again, 80% of the people will rarely change a lens. There are better lenses but most of us just won't notice the difference. I do believe that image stabilization is a must. In my mind it is the single biggest benefit to the average user. Sure some lenses focus faster or are better in low light but most of us can just hold down the shutter and use a flash.Get the camera and have some fun. There will be plenty of time to upgrade lenses, flashes, etc. You'll never be able to get back the pictures you miss.

Like many people I spent nearly three months trying to determine which camera to purchase. I looked at the Nikon D90 and D7000; as well as, the Canon T2i. In the end I felt the best value was the Canon 60D. I could go on and on about the camera but most importantly I can say I'm very happy with my decision. <hl> This camera is stacked with features and takes fantastic pictures . <hl> I honestly don't think you can go wrong with any of the cameras but for me it came down to pixels, pentaprism, autofocus, LCD, and price. I have always been a Canon guy (A1, two Rebels) but this was my first digital and I was open to either company. In the end my view was that Canon is a better value at the lower end and Nikon is a better product at the high end. In terms of my decision to go with the 60D over the T2i I just felt that the extra features were going to get me better pictures and ultimately make me happier in the long term. These cameras are big so while the Rebel is smaller it is still a substantial camera with the lens on it. You have to be committed to carrying around a camera of this size. From a price perspective, the 60D was an additional $200. That gets you a better view finder and better focusing. These two things can make a huge difference between getting the best possible picture. Having used a high end film camera since I was 15 I find the controls to be very intuitive. There is a lot there so it will still take me some time to learn all the features but I'm able to get off and running very quickly. When you look at the reviews most of the issues are overstated. The majority of pictures with this camera will be taken in one of the standard shooting modes. The rest of the settings are nice to have but are hard to fiddle with when you are just concentrating on getting pictures taken of a brithday or a sporting event. There's one rule that seems to stand the test of time - the 80-20 rule. 80% of the people will use 20% of the functionality of this camera. The other 20% may use 80% but it will be less than 20% of the time. Lastly, I wouldn't get too caught up with the lenses either. This is a good all around lens if you can have only one lens. Again, 80% of the people will rarely change a lens. There are better lenses but most of us just won't notice the difference. I do believe that image stabilization is a must. In my mind it is the single biggest benefit to the average user. Sure some lenses focus faster or are better in low light but most of us can just hold down the shutter and use a flash. Get the camera and have some fun. There will be plenty of time to upgrade lenses, flashes, etc. You'll never be able to get back the pictures you miss.

b6f219e8272c8f930aa8dc78d5a84e76

electronics

The signal has always been excellent and almost never a drop signal

question: How was the connection?, context: I am using it for my wife's desktop that reside next door about 20 feet away. The signal has always been excellent and almost never a drop signal (knock on wood)just use the standard connecting software from Windows 7/8/8.1 and ignore the TP-LINK software all together. Overall this is an excellent piece of hardware especially factoring the price.

How was the connection?

The signal has always been excellent and almost never a drop signal (knock on wood)just use the standard connecting software from Windows 7/8/8.1 and ignore the TP-LINK software all together.

I am using it for my wife's desktop that reside next door about 20 feet away. The signal has always been excellent and almost never a drop signal (knock on wood)just use the standard connecting software from Windows 7/8/8.1 and ignore the TP-LINK software all together. Overall this is an excellent piece of hardware especially factoring the price.

<hl> The signal has always been excellent and almost never a drop signal <hl> (knock on wood)just use the standard connecting software from Windows 7/8/8.1 and ignore the TP-LINK software all together.

I am using it for my wife's desktop that reside next door about 20 feet away. <hl> The signal has always been excellent and almost never a drop signal <hl> (knock on wood)just use the standard connecting software from Windows 7/8/8.1 and ignore the TP-LINK software all together. Overall this is an excellent piece of hardware especially factoring the price.

I am using it for my wife's desktop that reside next door about 20 feet away. <hl> The signal has always been excellent and almost never a drop signal (knock on wood)just use the standard connecting software from Windows 7/8/8.1 and ignore the TP-LINK software all together. <hl> Overall this is an excellent piece of hardware especially factoring the price.

68e3d8409891b533e31e26835e7b4b45

electronics

Just works too damn good

question: How is the design?, context: This cooling pad is great. I have a lg. 18&#34; HP that is prone to getting real hot. Not a problem anymore! Love it! The plug does have some sharp edges on it as it is made to be plugged into if needing the extra port. This is a standard plug and I would not miss out on this pad because of it. Just works too damn good!

How is the design?

Just works too damn good !

This cooling pad is great. I have a lg. 18&#34; HP that is prone to getting real hot. Not a problem anymore! Love it! The plug does have some sharp edges on it as it is made to be plugged into if needing the extra port. This is a standard plug and I would not miss out on this pad because of it. Just works too damn good!

<hl> Just works too damn good <hl> !

This cooling pad is great. I have a lg. 18&#34; HP that is prone to getting real hot. Not a problem anymore! Love it! The plug does have some sharp edges on it as it is made to be plugged into if needing the extra port. This is a standard plug and I would not miss out on this pad because of it. <hl> Just works too damn good <hl>!

This cooling pad is great. I have a lg. 18&#34; HP that is prone to getting real hot. Not a problem anymore! Love it! The plug does have some sharp edges on it as it is made to be plugged into if needing the extra port. This is a standard plug and I would not miss out on this pad because of it. <hl> Just works too damn good ! <hl>

451f6c2ce9d03d51cd3a8e24d25dd75d

electronics

phone!They are reccomended a hundred percent

question: How do you rate the quality?, context: Their cord is too large to pick it on the go, the desing its not the best but ok!And for my head they are a it small.Altough all this issues the sound is perfect, they sound as good as a Beats HD, they are pretty affordable and cheap, so this is a pretty good option if you re looking for some oon ear headphones to listen your music on your mp3, ipod, cell phone!They are reccomended a hundred percent!

How do you rate the quality?

Altough all this issues the sound is perfect, they sound as good as a Beats HD, they are pretty affordable and cheap, so this is a pretty good option if you re looking for some oon ear headphones to listen your music on your mp3, ipod, cell phone!They are reccomended a hundred percent !

Their cord is too large to pick it on the go, the desing its not the best but ok!And for my head they are a it small.Altough all this issues the sound is perfect, they sound as good as a Beats HD, they are pretty affordable and cheap, so this is a pretty good option if you re looking for some oon ear headphones to listen your music on your mp3, ipod, cell phone!They are reccomended a hundred percent!

Altough all this issues the sound is perfect, they sound as good as a Beats HD, they are pretty affordable and cheap, so this is a pretty good option if you re looking for some oon ear headphones to listen your music on your mp3, ipod, cell <hl> phone!They are reccomended a hundred percent <hl> !

Their cord is too large to pick it on the go, the desing its not the best but ok!And for my head they are a it small.Altough all this issues the sound is perfect, they sound as good as a Beats HD, they are pretty affordable and cheap, so this is a pretty good option if you re looking for some oon ear headphones to listen your music on your mp3, ipod, cell <hl> phone!They are reccomended a hundred percent <hl>!

Their cord is too large to pick it on the go, the desing its not the best but ok!And for my head they are a it small. <hl> Altough all this issues the sound is perfect, they sound as good as a Beats HD, they are pretty affordable and cheap, so this is a pretty good option if you re looking for some oon ear headphones to listen your music on your mp3, ipod, cell phone!They are reccomended a hundred percent ! <hl>

44105dd4eac1ed5192e04f4def7048b2

electronics

HDMI cable

question: How is the output from the from the z-680?, context: Roku 2 maker needs to be more specific with instructions when error occurs. Using composite cables my picture was black & white which was never mentioned in instructions. HDMI cable presented good color. Great little unit.

How is the output from the from the z-680?

HDMI cable presented good color.

Roku 2 maker needs to be more specific with instructions when error occurs. Using composite cables my picture was black & white which was never mentioned in instructions. HDMI cable presented good color. Great little unit.

<hl> HDMI cable <hl> presented good color.

Roku 2 maker needs to be more specific with instructions when error occurs. Using composite cables my picture was black & white which was never mentioned in instructions. <hl> HDMI cable <hl> presented good color. Great little unit.

Roku 2 maker needs to be more specific with instructions when error occurs. Using composite cables my picture was black & white which was never mentioned in instructions. <hl> HDMI cable presented good color. <hl> Great little unit.

af87378a03dd868c687340a3f9e196a8

electronics

the unit was defective

question: Is the unit small?, context: Installed on system running Windows 7 x64 Ultimate. Had ZoneAlarm Security Suite installed and the installation software would install but the unit would not see my router. Contacted TP-LINK and after talking to one of their phone support tech, had gotten an RMA assuming the unit was defective.Not really wanting to ship the unit back to TP-LINK for a replacement, I did a bit of internet research and discovered that this unit has issues with ZoneAlarm Security Suite. The write-up recommended uninstalling ZoneAlarm, installing the driver, then reinstalling ZoneAlarm. I uninstalled ZoneAlarm and it took Windows 7 out with it.After reinstalling Windows 7, the TL-WN822N came up with signal strength 5 and is now working fine.

Is the unit small?

Contacted TP-LINK and after talking to one of their phone support tech, had gotten an RMA assuming the unit was defective .Not really wanting to ship the unit back to TP-LINK for a replacement, I did a bit of internet research and discovered that this unit has issues with ZoneAlarm Security Suite.

Installed on system running Windows 7 x64 Ultimate. Had ZoneAlarm Security Suite installed and the installation software would install but the unit would not see my router. Contacted TP-LINK and after talking to one of their phone support tech, had gotten an RMA assuming the unit was defective.Not really wanting to ship the unit back to TP-LINK for a replacement, I did a bit of internet research and discovered that this unit has issues with ZoneAlarm Security Suite. The write-up recommended uninstalling ZoneAlarm, installing the driver, then reinstalling ZoneAlarm. I uninstalled ZoneAlarm and it took Windows 7 out with it.After reinstalling Windows 7, the TL-WN822N came up with signal strength 5 and is now working fine.

Contacted TP-LINK and after talking to one of their phone support tech, had gotten an RMA assuming <hl> the unit was defective <hl> .Not really wanting to ship the unit back to TP-LINK for a replacement, I did a bit of internet research and discovered that this unit has issues with ZoneAlarm Security Suite.

Installed on system running Windows 7 x64 Ultimate. Had ZoneAlarm Security Suite installed and the installation software would install but the unit would not see my router. Contacted TP-LINK and after talking to one of their phone support tech, had gotten an RMA assuming <hl> the unit was defective <hl>.Not really wanting to ship the unit back to TP-LINK for a replacement, I did a bit of internet research and discovered that this unit has issues with ZoneAlarm Security Suite. The write-up recommended uninstalling ZoneAlarm, installing the driver, then reinstalling ZoneAlarm. I uninstalled ZoneAlarm and it took Windows 7 out with it.After reinstalling Windows 7, the TL-WN822N came up with signal strength 5 and is now working fine.

Installed on system running Windows 7 x64 Ultimate. Had ZoneAlarm Security Suite installed and the installation software would install but the unit would not see my router. <hl> Contacted TP-LINK and after talking to one of their phone support tech, had gotten an RMA assuming the unit was defective .Not really wanting to ship the unit back to TP-LINK for a replacement, I did a bit of internet research and discovered that this unit has issues with ZoneAlarm Security Suite. <hl> The write-up recommended uninstalling ZoneAlarm, installing the driver, then reinstalling ZoneAlarm. I uninstalled ZoneAlarm and it took Windows 7 out with it. After reinstalling Windows 7, the TL-WN822N came up with signal strength 5 and is now working fine.

3d9cdfea1eb1bb8d3be67b0c9b0712a5

electronics

32-inch

question: What is the screen size of your tv?, context: As Amazon consolidates reviews for various models in the same product line, please note that this is a review of the Vizio E320i-A0.If you purchase this TV it will bring you frustration. The user interface (UI) installed on the Vizio E320i-A0 is Vizio's crippled Yahoo! TV Apps/M-GO interface, NOT the company's "Vizio Internet Apps Plus" interface. It is clunky, frustrating, limited, and NOT user friendly. While the TV is just fine as standard TV or monitor, and has a decent picture, adequate sound, and plenty of inputs, the UI is terrible and the remote is almost worthless. It is not a good value as it comes at a premium over a similarly appointed HD set, and you can save nearly a C-note and a whole bunch of frustration if you simply buy a "dumb" 32-inch HD set and a Roku LT from Amazon.I purchased this TV in January 2013 on Vizio's promise that it would provide an outstanding Smart TV experience. It was anything BUT outstanding. Its primary app, "M-GO" (prominently displayed on both the unit's UI home screen and its lousy remote control), was billed as a "revolutionary" TV experience when I purchased the TV. Bizarrely, M-GO wasn't installed on the TV at the time of purchase and didn't even become available for it until Summer 2013. When it finally did arrive via Vizio's eventual firmware update, M-GO turned out to be all "pay" TV - no included content. It was thoroughly disappointing and not "revolutionary" as promised. I already have Netflix and Amazon Prime, so I don't need their lousy pay app. Aside from M-GO, there are other apps available for the E320i-A0 -- some are preinstalled like Yahoo! Finance and Skype, but most are downloaded through the Yahoo! TV Apps store in the unit's poorly structured UI. Strangely, Yahoo! TV Apps offers only a very limited number of apps for this "smart" TV -- a grand total of 134 (that's right: ONLY ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY FOUR!) as of this writing on December 26, 2013 -- and most of them are either local news station apps from distant corners of the U.S., or paid anime/cartoon channels. Even the familiar apps like iHeart Radio have limited feature sets and don't offer the programmable, personalized channels you would customarily be able to set up on your computer or smart phone, but rather offer only a specified set of broadcast stations from select markets. The entire experience is really bizarre.Ultimately, the greatest disappointment of the E320i-A0 is its abysmal UI and limited apps, which Vizio flatly informed me it has no intention to update to its current "VIA Plus" interface. Again, the TV is good in terms of picture, size, sound and inputs, but the "smart" content is worthless. If you buy this TV you will be stuck with the lousy UI, crappy remote, and crippled apps. Be forewarned, and get a "dumb" TV and a Roku (or Chromecast, or XBox 360, etc); you'll be much happier you did.

What is the screen size of your tv?

It is not a good value as it comes at a premium over a similarly appointed HD set, and you can save nearly a C-note and a whole bunch of frustration if you simply buy a "dumb" 32-inch HD set and a Roku LT from Amazon.

As Amazon consolidates reviews for various models in the same product line, please note that this is a review of the Vizio E320i-A0.If you purchase this TV it will bring you frustration. The user interface (UI) installed on the Vizio E320i-A0 is Vizio's crippled Yahoo! TV Apps/M-GO interface, NOT the company's "Vizio Internet Apps Plus" interface. It is clunky, frustrating, limited, and NOT user friendly. While the TV is just fine as standard TV or monitor, and has a decent picture, adequate sound, and plenty of inputs, the UI is terrible and the remote is almost worthless. It is not a good value as it comes at a premium over a similarly appointed HD set, and you can save nearly a C-note and a whole bunch of frustration if you simply buy a "dumb" 32-inch HD set and a Roku LT from Amazon.I purchased this TV in January 2013 on Vizio's promise that it would provide an outstanding Smart TV experience. It was anything BUT outstanding. Its primary app, "M-GO" (prominently displayed on both the unit's UI home screen and its lousy remote control), was billed as a "revolutionary" TV experience when I purchased the TV. Bizarrely, M-GO wasn't installed on the TV at the time of purchase and didn't even become available for it until Summer 2013. When it finally did arrive via Vizio's eventual firmware update, M-GO turned out to be all "pay" TV - no included content. It was thoroughly disappointing and not "revolutionary" as promised. I already have Netflix and Amazon Prime, so I don't need their lousy pay app. Aside from M-GO, there are other apps available for the E320i-A0 -- some are preinstalled like Yahoo! Finance and Skype, but most are downloaded through the Yahoo! TV Apps store in the unit's poorly structured UI. Strangely, Yahoo! TV Apps offers only a very limited number of apps for this "smart" TV -- a grand total of 134 (that's right: ONLY ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY FOUR!) as of this writing on December 26, 2013 -- and most of them are either local news station apps from distant corners of the U.S., or paid anime/cartoon channels. Even the familiar apps like iHeart Radio have limited feature sets and don't offer the programmable, personalized channels you would customarily be able to set up on your computer or smart phone, but rather offer only a specified set of broadcast stations from select markets. The entire experience is really bizarre.Ultimately, the greatest disappointment of the E320i-A0 is its abysmal UI and limited apps, which Vizio flatly informed me it has no intention to update to its current "VIA Plus" interface. Again, the TV is good in terms of picture, size, sound and inputs, but the "smart" content is worthless. If you buy this TV you will be stuck with the lousy UI, crappy remote, and crippled apps. Be forewarned, and get a "dumb" TV and a Roku (or Chromecast, or XBox 360, etc); you'll be much happier you did.

It is not a good value as it comes at a premium over a similarly appointed HD set, and you can save nearly a C-note and a whole bunch of frustration if you simply buy a "dumb" <hl> 32-inch <hl> HD set and a Roku LT from Amazon.

As Amazon consolidates reviews for various models in the same product line, please note that this is a review of the Vizio E320i-A0.If you purchase this TV it will bring you frustration. The user interface (UI) installed on the Vizio E320i-A0 is Vizio's crippled Yahoo! TV Apps/M-GO interface, NOT the company's "Vizio Internet Apps Plus" interface. It is clunky, frustrating, limited, and NOT user friendly. While the TV is just fine as standard TV or monitor, and has a decent picture, adequate sound, and plenty of inputs, the UI is terrible and the remote is almost worthless. It is not a good value as it comes at a premium over a similarly appointed HD set, and you can save nearly a C-note and a whole bunch of frustration if you simply buy a "dumb" <hl> 32-inch <hl> HD set and a Roku LT from Amazon.I purchased this TV in January 2013 on Vizio's promise that it would provide an outstanding Smart TV experience. It was anything BUT outstanding. Its primary app, "M-GO" (prominently displayed on both the unit's UI home screen and its lousy remote control), was billed as a "revolutionary" TV experience when I purchased the TV. Bizarrely, M-GO wasn't installed on the TV at the time of purchase and didn't even become available for it until Summer 2013. When it finally did arrive via Vizio's eventual firmware update, M-GO turned out to be all "pay" TV - no included content. It was thoroughly disappointing and not "revolutionary" as promised. I already have Netflix and Amazon Prime, so I don't need their lousy pay app. Aside from M-GO, there are other apps available for the E320i-A0 -- some are preinstalled like Yahoo! Finance and Skype, but most are downloaded through the Yahoo! TV Apps store in the unit's poorly structured UI. Strangely, Yahoo! TV Apps offers only a very limited number of apps for this "smart" TV -- a grand total of 134 (that's right: ONLY ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY FOUR!) as of this writing on December 26, 2013 -- and most of them are either local news station apps from distant corners of the U.S., or paid anime/cartoon channels. Even the familiar apps like iHeart Radio have limited feature sets and don't offer the programmable, personalized channels you would customarily be able to set up on your computer or smart phone, but rather offer only a specified set of broadcast stations from select markets. The entire experience is really bizarre.Ultimately, the greatest disappointment of the E320i-A0 is its abysmal UI and limited apps, which Vizio flatly informed me it has no intention to update to its current "VIA Plus" interface. Again, the TV is good in terms of picture, size, sound and inputs, but the "smart" content is worthless. If you buy this TV you will be stuck with the lousy UI, crappy remote, and crippled apps. Be forewarned, and get a "dumb" TV and a Roku (or Chromecast, or XBox 360, etc); you'll be much happier you did.

As Amazon consolidates reviews for various models in the same product line, please note that this is a review of the Vizio E320i-A0.If you purchase this TV it will bring you frustration. The user interface (UI) installed on the Vizio E320i-A0 is Vizio's crippled Yahoo! TV Apps/M-GO interface, NOT the company's "Vizio Internet Apps Plus" interface. It is clunky, frustrating, limited, and NOT user friendly. While the TV is just fine as standard TV or monitor, and has a decent picture, adequate sound, and plenty of inputs, the UI is terrible and the remote is almost worthless. <hl> It is not a good value as it comes at a premium over a similarly appointed HD set, and you can save nearly a C-note and a whole bunch of frustration if you simply buy a "dumb" 32-inch HD set and a Roku LT from Amazon. <hl> I purchased this TV in January 2013 on Vizio's promise that it would provide an outstanding Smart TV experience. It was anything BUT outstanding. Its primary app, "M-GO" (prominently displayed on both the unit's UI home screen and its lousy remote control), was billed as a "revolutionary" TV experience when I purchased the TV. Bizarrely, M-GO wasn't installed on the TV at the time of purchase and didn't even become available for it until Summer 2013. When it finally did arrive via Vizio's eventual firmware update, M-GO turned out to be all "pay" TV - no included content. It was thoroughly disappointing and not "revolutionary" as promised. I already have Netflix and Amazon Prime, so I don't need their lousy pay app. Aside from M-GO, there are other apps available for the E320i-A0 -- some are preinstalled like Yahoo! Finance and Skype, but most are downloaded through the Yahoo! TV Apps store in the unit's poorly structured UI. Strangely, Yahoo! TV Apps offers only a very limited number of apps for this "smart" TV -- a grand total of 134 (that's right: ONLY ONE HUNDRED AND THIRTY FOUR!) as of this writing on December 26, 2013 -- and most of them are either local news station apps from distant corners of the U.S., or paid anime/cartoon channels. Even the familiar apps like iHeart Radio have limited feature sets and don't offer the programmable, personalized channels you would customarily be able to set up on your computer or smart phone, but rather offer only a specified set of broadcast stations from select markets. The entire experience is really bizarre. Ultimately, the greatest disappointment of the E320i-A0 is its abysmal UI and limited apps, which Vizio flatly informed me it has no intention to update to its current "VIA Plus" interface. Again, the TV is good in terms of picture, size, sound and inputs, but the "smart" content is worthless. If you buy this TV you will be stuck with the lousy UI, crappy remote, and crippled apps. Be forewarned, and get a "dumb" TV and a Roku (or Chromecast, or XBox 360, etc); you'll be much happier you did.

28480beedb8b6c838d192ccf63ede7ef

electronics

notebook

question: How is the price?, context: My wife uses this notebook cooler for a 14 inch laptop computer. It's been very reliable and comfortable thus far.Some thoughts:- The notebook cooler's build quality is superior! The material is so smooth and solid, and is very sturdy. I've noticed that the smooth texture of the cooler's base and many ventilated holes makes it harder for dust to collect. Several coolers I've owned and seen have had the problem of getting too dusty. Not a problem here.- The two fans give you the option to move them around, placing them wherever you'd like to place it. This is an ingenious feature because now you can move the fans to where you need it most. This is great, considering notebook cooler designs have always been stationary.- Overall good design. The angle and strength of the cooler is excellent and provides hours of comfort. Playing games, editing documents, surfing the internet, all computing tasks are comfortable with this cooler.- I like the idea of having this cooler also be a portable notebook carrier, but doesn't quite work well. If you do decide to use it to move somewhere else, you'll need to move the two fans, which potentially could be a nuance.All in all, an extremely well designed notebook cooler that let's you place the two fans, is of great quality, and comfort.

How is the price?

My wife uses this notebook cooler for a 14 inch laptop computer.

My wife uses this notebook cooler for a 14 inch laptop computer. It's been very reliable and comfortable thus far.Some thoughts:- The notebook cooler's build quality is superior! The material is so smooth and solid, and is very sturdy. I've noticed that the smooth texture of the cooler's base and many ventilated holes makes it harder for dust to collect. Several coolers I've owned and seen have had the problem of getting too dusty. Not a problem here.- The two fans give you the option to move them around, placing them wherever you'd like to place it. This is an ingenious feature because now you can move the fans to where you need it most. This is great, considering notebook cooler designs have always been stationary.- Overall good design. The angle and strength of the cooler is excellent and provides hours of comfort. Playing games, editing documents, surfing the internet, all computing tasks are comfortable with this cooler.- I like the idea of having this cooler also be a portable notebook carrier, but doesn't quite work well. If you do decide to use it to move somewhere else, you'll need to move the two fans, which potentially could be a nuance.All in all, an extremely well designed notebook cooler that let's you place the two fans, is of great quality, and comfort.

My wife uses this <hl> notebook <hl> cooler for a 14 inch laptop computer.

My wife uses this <hl> notebook <hl> cooler for a 14 inch laptop computer. It's been very reliable and comfortable thus far.Some thoughts:- The notebook cooler's build quality is superior! The material is so smooth and solid, and is very sturdy. I've noticed that the smooth texture of the cooler's base and many ventilated holes makes it harder for dust to collect. Several coolers I've owned and seen have had the problem of getting too dusty. Not a problem here.- The two fans give you the option to move them around, placing them wherever you'd like to place it. This is an ingenious feature because now you can move the fans to where you need it most. This is great, considering notebook cooler designs have always been stationary.- Overall good design. The angle and strength of the cooler is excellent and provides hours of comfort. Playing games, editing documents, surfing the internet, all computing tasks are comfortable with this cooler.- I like the idea of having this cooler also be a portable notebook carrier, but doesn't quite work well. If you do decide to use it to move somewhere else, you'll need to move the two fans, which potentially could be a nuance.All in all, an extremely well designed notebook cooler that let's you place the two fans, is of great quality, and comfort.

<hl> My wife uses this notebook cooler for a 14 inch laptop computer. <hl> It's been very reliable and comfortable thus far. Some thoughts:- The notebook cooler's build quality is superior! The material is so smooth and solid, and is very sturdy. I've noticed that the smooth texture of the cooler's base and many ventilated holes makes it harder for dust to collect. Several coolers I've owned and seen have had the problem of getting too dusty. Not a problem here.- The two fans give you the option to move them around, placing them wherever you'd like to place it. This is an ingenious feature because now you can move the fans to where you need it most. This is great, considering notebook cooler designs have always been stationary.- Overall good design. The angle and strength of the cooler is excellent and provides hours of comfort. Playing games, editing documents, surfing the internet, all computing tasks are comfortable with this cooler.- I like the idea of having this cooler also be a portable notebook carrier, but doesn't quite work well. If you do decide to use it to move somewhere else, you'll need to move the two fans, which potentially could be a nuance. All in all, an extremely well designed notebook cooler that let's you place the two fans, is of great quality, and comfort.

dc6a44259700a1ab2109739647e35546

electronics

great battery life

question: How is battery life?, context: These things are great! They sound good, are well designed and have a great battery life. I plan on buying another set if I don't first get them for Christmas.

How is battery life?

They sound good, are well designed and have a great battery life .

These things are great! They sound good, are well designed and have a great battery life. I plan on buying another set if I don't first get them for Christmas.

They sound good, are well designed and have a <hl> great battery life <hl> .

These things are great! They sound good, are well designed and have a <hl> great battery life <hl>. I plan on buying another set if I don't first get them for Christmas.

These things are great! <hl> They sound good, are well designed and have a great battery life . <hl> I plan on buying another set if I don't first get them for Christmas.

a852ffed01276642d6177e5a6c91e1e1

electronics

The image and colors are great

question: Are the images of very good quality?, context: I am still getting used to this monitor, but what I see so far I like. My only complaint would be that it is so automated that I find it hard to do the simple things like adjust position. I will learn but right now it is set to full aspect with no selection available for position. I also find that with my old eye's I have to use explorer in 125% view mode to see the characters. Not a big deal as there is plenty of viewing space for 99% of the web pages.The image and colors are great. I use with HDMI mode and wireless push2tv. (I can not recommend push2tv though.)I would purchase again.

Are the images of very good quality?

The image and colors are great .

I am still getting used to this monitor, but what I see so far I like. My only complaint would be that it is so automated that I find it hard to do the simple things like adjust position. I will learn but right now it is set to full aspect with no selection available for position. I also find that with my old eye's I have to use explorer in 125% view mode to see the characters. Not a big deal as there is plenty of viewing space for 99% of the web pages.The image and colors are great. I use with HDMI mode and wireless push2tv. (I can not recommend push2tv though.)I would purchase again.

<hl> The image and colors are great <hl> .

I am still getting used to this monitor, but what I see so far I like. My only complaint would be that it is so automated that I find it hard to do the simple things like adjust position. I will learn but right now it is set to full aspect with no selection available for position. I also find that with my old eye's I have to use explorer in 125% view mode to see the characters. Not a big deal as there is plenty of viewing space for 99% of the web pages.<hl> The image and colors are great <hl>. I use with HDMI mode and wireless push2tv. (I can not recommend push2tv though.)I would purchase again.

I am still getting used to this monitor, but what I see so far I like. My only complaint would be that it is so automated that I find it hard to do the simple things like adjust position. I will learn but right now it is set to full aspect with no selection available for position. I also find that with my old eye's I have to use explorer in 125% view mode to see the characters. Not a big deal as there is plenty of viewing space for 99% of the web pages. <hl> The image and colors are great . <hl> I use with HDMI mode and wireless push2tv. (I can not recommend push2tv though.)I would purchase again.

2e462733a120a88cd06218be48f0f81b

electronics

This bag is perfect for my present needs

question: What do you think about pocket?, context: This bag is perfect for my present needs, and even has room for another lens in the future. In the main compartment I have, assembled and ready to be used, the Canon T2i with battery pack and 18-55 kit lens with lens hood. I put the camera in its place holding the hand grip, which makes it easy to put the camera in the bag and pull it out. Because the camera is fully assembled, all I need to do is turn it on and remove the lens cover and it is ready for use.Also in the main compartment is the Canon 55-250 lens with lens hood attached. The lens is positioned with the lens hood up. The lens with hood is a fraction of an inch taller than the side of the bag, but this does not interfere with the closing of the bag or the use of the side pockets. When the bag is closed, there is no way to tell that with the lens hood attached the 55-250 lens stands a little taller than the side of the main compartment.There is space left over in the main compartment for another lens, which because I have no other lens at present, I am using to hold a pair of glasses in a case.The 2 large, zippered storage compartments on the outside of the bag, plus the storage in the lid and on the front of the bag, give me all the room that I need for SD cards, a reserve battery pack for the battery pack, cleaning supplies, a camera manual,Attached to the bottom of the bag are straps intended to attach a tripod to bottom of bag. Initially I was put off by those straps and had scissors in hand to cut them off. However, remembering that I have a cheap, light weight tripod in addition to my larger, heavier one, and also realizing that this would be a good place to carry an umbrella when out of days when weather is questionable, I let the straps alone. Now that I realize that they can at least occasionally be of benefit to me, they no longer bother me.The bag is well made and attractive and the padding and weather protection are satisfactory.

What do you think about pocket?

This bag is perfect for my present needs , and even has room for another lens in the future.

This bag is perfect for my present needs, and even has room for another lens in the future. In the main compartment I have, assembled and ready to be used, the Canon T2i with battery pack and 18-55 kit lens with lens hood. I put the camera in its place holding the hand grip, which makes it easy to put the camera in the bag and pull it out. Because the camera is fully assembled, all I need to do is turn it on and remove the lens cover and it is ready for use.Also in the main compartment is the Canon 55-250 lens with lens hood attached. The lens is positioned with the lens hood up. The lens with hood is a fraction of an inch taller than the side of the bag, but this does not interfere with the closing of the bag or the use of the side pockets. When the bag is closed, there is no way to tell that with the lens hood attached the 55-250 lens stands a little taller than the side of the main compartment.There is space left over in the main compartment for another lens, which because I have no other lens at present, I am using to hold a pair of glasses in a case.The 2 large, zippered storage compartments on the outside of the bag, plus the storage in the lid and on the front of the bag, give me all the room that I need for SD cards, a reserve battery pack for the battery pack, cleaning supplies, a camera manual,Attached to the bottom of the bag are straps intended to attach a tripod to bottom of bag. Initially I was put off by those straps and had scissors in hand to cut them off. However, remembering that I have a cheap, light weight tripod in addition to my larger, heavier one, and also realizing that this would be a good place to carry an umbrella when out of days when weather is questionable, I let the straps alone. Now that I realize that they can at least occasionally be of benefit to me, they no longer bother me.The bag is well made and attractive and the padding and weather protection are satisfactory.

<hl> This bag is perfect for my present needs <hl> , and even has room for another lens in the future.

<hl> This bag is perfect for my present needs <hl>, and even has room for another lens in the future. In the main compartment I have, assembled and ready to be used, the Canon T2i with battery pack and 18-55 kit lens with lens hood. I put the camera in its place holding the hand grip, which makes it easy to put the camera in the bag and pull it out. Because the camera is fully assembled, all I need to do is turn it on and remove the lens cover and it is ready for use.Also in the main compartment is the Canon 55-250 lens with lens hood attached. The lens is positioned with the lens hood up. The lens with hood is a fraction of an inch taller than the side of the bag, but this does not interfere with the closing of the bag or the use of the side pockets. When the bag is closed, there is no way to tell that with the lens hood attached the 55-250 lens stands a little taller than the side of the main compartment.There is space left over in the main compartment for another lens, which because I have no other lens at present, I am using to hold a pair of glasses in a case.The 2 large, zippered storage compartments on the outside of the bag, plus the storage in the lid and on the front of the bag, give me all the room that I need for SD cards, a reserve battery pack for the battery pack, cleaning supplies, a camera manual,Attached to the bottom of the bag are straps intended to attach a tripod to bottom of bag. Initially I was put off by those straps and had scissors in hand to cut them off. However, remembering that I have a cheap, light weight tripod in addition to my larger, heavier one, and also realizing that this would be a good place to carry an umbrella when out of days when weather is questionable, I let the straps alone. Now that I realize that they can at least occasionally be of benefit to me, they no longer bother me.The bag is well made and attractive and the padding and weather protection are satisfactory.

<hl> This bag is perfect for my present needs , and even has room for another lens in the future. <hl> In the main compartment I have, assembled and ready to be used, the Canon T2i with battery pack and 18-55 kit lens with lens hood. I put the camera in its place holding the hand grip, which makes it easy to put the camera in the bag and pull it out. Because the camera is fully assembled, all I need to do is turn it on and remove the lens cover and it is ready for use. Also in the main compartment is the Canon 55-250 lens with lens hood attached. The lens is positioned with the lens hood up. The lens with hood is a fraction of an inch taller than the side of the bag, but this does not interfere with the closing of the bag or the use of the side pockets. When the bag is closed, there is no way to tell that with the lens hood attached the 55-250 lens stands a little taller than the side of the main compartment. There is space left over in the main compartment for another lens, which because I have no other lens at present, I am using to hold a pair of glasses in a case. The 2 large, zippered storage compartments on the outside of the bag, plus the storage in the lid and on the front of the bag, give me all the room that I need for SD cards, a reserve battery pack for the battery pack, cleaning supplies, a camera manual,Attached to the bottom of the bag are straps intended to attach a tripod to bottom of bag. Initially I was put off by those straps and had scissors in hand to cut them off. However, remembering that I have a cheap, light weight tripod in addition to my larger, heavier one, and also realizing that this would be a good place to carry an umbrella when out of days when weather is questionable, I let the straps alone. Now that I realize that they can at least occasionally be of benefit to me, they no longer bother me. The bag is well made and attractive and the padding and weather protection are satisfactory.

cfb85c215d2e79a7f7d24e5355bb896f

electronics

They are super comfortable

question: What are the sizes of the lens?, context: Sound Quality: Sony MDR-AS20J[by a long margin][almost tied]Panasonic Slimz RP-HJE350K, JBuds original, iLuv City Lights EP322[not so good] SkullCandy ink'd S2INCB, Ult Ear 100Loudest[bars on Sansa]: iLuv [3-], ink'd [3], Sony[3+], Panasonic [4-], JBuds [4], Ultimate Ears 100[4+]Recommendation: JBud originals, and save $ for Sennheiser 300Bs or Klipsh S4sThe Sonys were the only earbuds that sounded close to a home stereo with headphones! They are super comfortable. On the down side, they don't seal out noise and the wires seem fragile and will tangle frequently.Coltrane's saxophone on "Moments Notice" was the hardest to reproduce. The Sonys were excellent, the iLuvs were decent, the JBuds and Ult Ear 100s sounded poor, the rest were terrible.The Panasonics sound would still rate second, well behind the Sonys with all the music. The Panasonic wires tangle. The iLuvs sound was close to the Panasonics and the wires were manageable. The iLuvs would extend playing time because they need the least volume. But, the buds are large, seemed to want to fall out, and may not be super comfortable.The JBuds were the least expensive and sounded OK, but the bass is weak. These are very comfortable buds. Wires were manageable, but had a straight plug. The Ultimate ears sound was poor. The wires were so stiff they would pull the buds out.The Skullcandy ink'd were disappointing. [EZ, SC fans!] "Eruption" was electric, better than my home stereo headphones. They are efficient and reproduce deep bass notes you don't even hear with the others. But, the saxophone on "Moments Notice" was unnatural and the other tracks sound hollow and distant. The ink'd were new, they may improve with break in. Setting the Sansa EQ to HipHop helped the horn, but overall still no match for the Sonys or the Panasonics. The wires are a little too stiff and the plug is straight.Tested these earbuds by pausing mid-song and changing buds on a Sansa Clip Zip. Compared, by pairs, to determine the subjective quality of each against the others. Tracks used: "Take Five," Dave Brubeck; "Belong," R.E.M.; "Bring Me To Life," Evanescense; "Atomic Dog," George Clinton; "Wild Thing," Tone-LOC; "Eruption," Van Halen; all ripped from personal CDs with Windows Media Player[320kb/s] and "Moments Notice," John Coltrane from Amazon MP3.

What are the sizes of the lens?

They are super comfortable .

Sound Quality: Sony MDR-AS20J[by a long margin][almost tied]Panasonic Slimz RP-HJE350K, JBuds original, iLuv City Lights EP322[not so good] SkullCandy ink'd S2INCB, Ult Ear 100Loudest[bars on Sansa]: iLuv [3-], ink'd [3], Sony[3+], Panasonic [4-], JBuds [4], Ultimate Ears 100[4+]Recommendation: JBud originals, and save $ for Sennheiser 300Bs or Klipsh S4sThe Sonys were the only earbuds that sounded close to a home stereo with headphones! They are super comfortable. On the down side, they don't seal out noise and the wires seem fragile and will tangle frequently.Coltrane's saxophone on "Moments Notice" was the hardest to reproduce. The Sonys were excellent, the iLuvs were decent, the JBuds and Ult Ear 100s sounded poor, the rest were terrible.The Panasonics sound would still rate second, well behind the Sonys with all the music. The Panasonic wires tangle. The iLuvs sound was close to the Panasonics and the wires were manageable. The iLuvs would extend playing time because they need the least volume. But, the buds are large, seemed to want to fall out, and may not be super comfortable.The JBuds were the least expensive and sounded OK, but the bass is weak. These are very comfortable buds. Wires were manageable, but had a straight plug. The Ultimate ears sound was poor. The wires were so stiff they would pull the buds out.The Skullcandy ink'd were disappointing. [EZ, SC fans!] "Eruption" was electric, better than my home stereo headphones. They are efficient and reproduce deep bass notes you don't even hear with the others. But, the saxophone on "Moments Notice" was unnatural and the other tracks sound hollow and distant. The ink'd were new, they may improve with break in. Setting the Sansa EQ to HipHop helped the horn, but overall still no match for the Sonys or the Panasonics. The wires are a little too stiff and the plug is straight.Tested these earbuds by pausing mid-song and changing buds on a Sansa Clip Zip. Compared, by pairs, to determine the subjective quality of each against the others. Tracks used: "Take Five," Dave Brubeck; "Belong," R.E.M.; "Bring Me To Life," Evanescense; "Atomic Dog," George Clinton; "Wild Thing," Tone-LOC; "Eruption," Van Halen; all ripped from personal CDs with Windows Media Player[320kb/s] and "Moments Notice," John Coltrane from Amazon MP3.

<hl> They are super comfortable <hl> .

Sound Quality: Sony MDR-AS20J[by a long margin][almost tied]Panasonic Slimz RP-HJE350K, JBuds original, iLuv City Lights EP322[not so good] SkullCandy ink'd S2INCB, Ult Ear 100Loudest[bars on Sansa]: iLuv [3-], ink'd [3], Sony[3+], Panasonic [4-], JBuds [4], Ultimate Ears 100[4+]Recommendation: JBud originals, and save $ for Sennheiser 300Bs or Klipsh S4sThe Sonys were the only earbuds that sounded close to a home stereo with headphones! <hl> They are super comfortable <hl>. On the down side, they don't seal out noise and the wires seem fragile and will tangle frequently.Coltrane's saxophone on "Moments Notice" was the hardest to reproduce. The Sonys were excellent, the iLuvs were decent, the JBuds and Ult Ear 100s sounded poor, the rest were terrible.The Panasonics sound would still rate second, well behind the Sonys with all the music. The Panasonic wires tangle. The iLuvs sound was close to the Panasonics and the wires were manageable. The iLuvs would extend playing time because they need the least volume. But, the buds are large, seemed to want to fall out, and may not be super comfortable.The JBuds were the least expensive and sounded OK, but the bass is weak. These are very comfortable buds. Wires were manageable, but had a straight plug. The Ultimate ears sound was poor. The wires were so stiff they would pull the buds out.The Skullcandy ink'd were disappointing. [EZ, SC fans!] "Eruption" was electric, better than my home stereo headphones. They are efficient and reproduce deep bass notes you don't even hear with the others. But, the saxophone on "Moments Notice" was unnatural and the other tracks sound hollow and distant. The ink'd were new, they may improve with break in. Setting the Sansa EQ to HipHop helped the horn, but overall still no match for the Sonys or the Panasonics. The wires are a little too stiff and the plug is straight.Tested these earbuds by pausing mid-song and changing buds on a Sansa Clip Zip. Compared, by pairs, to determine the subjective quality of each against the others. Tracks used: "Take Five," Dave Brubeck; "Belong," R.E.M.; "Bring Me To Life," Evanescense; "Atomic Dog," George Clinton; "Wild Thing," Tone-LOC; "Eruption," Van Halen; all ripped from personal CDs with Windows Media Player[320kb/s] and "Moments Notice," John Coltrane from Amazon MP3.

Sound Quality: Sony MDR-AS20J[by a long margin][almost tied]Panasonic Slimz RP-HJE350K, JBuds original, iLuv City Lights EP322[not so good] SkullCandy ink'd S2INCB, Ult Ear 100Loudest[bars on Sansa]: iLuv [3-], ink'd [3], Sony[3+], Panasonic [4-], JBuds [4], Ultimate Ears 100[4+]Recommendation: JBud originals, and save $ for Sennheiser 300Bs or Klipsh S4sThe Sonys were the only earbuds that sounded close to a home stereo with headphones! <hl> They are super comfortable . <hl> On the down side, they don't seal out noise and the wires seem fragile and will tangle frequently. Coltrane's saxophone on "Moments Notice" was the hardest to reproduce. The Sonys were excellent, the iLuvs were decent, the JBuds and Ult Ear 100s sounded poor, the rest were terrible. The Panasonics sound would still rate second, well behind the Sonys with all the music. The Panasonic wires tangle. The iLuvs sound was close to the Panasonics and the wires were manageable. The iLuvs would extend playing time because they need the least volume. But, the buds are large, seemed to want to fall out, and may not be super comfortable. The JBuds were the least expensive and sounded OK, but the bass is weak. These are very comfortable buds. Wires were manageable, but had a straight plug. The Ultimate ears sound was poor. The wires were so stiff they would pull the buds out. The Skullcandy ink'd were disappointing. [EZ, SC fans!] "Eruption" was electric, better than my home stereo headphones. They are efficient and reproduce deep bass notes you don't even hear with the others. But, the saxophone on "Moments Notice" was unnatural and the other tracks sound hollow and distant. The ink'd were new, they may improve with break in. Setting the Sansa EQ to HipHop helped the horn, but overall still no match for the Sonys or the Panasonics. The wires are a little too stiff and the plug is straight. Tested these earbuds by pausing mid-song and changing buds on a Sansa Clip Zip. Compared, by pairs, to determine the subjective quality of each against the others. Tracks used: "Take Five," Dave Brubeck; "Belong," R.E.M.; "Bring Me To Life," Evanescense; "Atomic Dog," George Clinton; "Wild Thing," Tone-LOC; "Eruption," Van Halen; all ripped from personal CDs with Windows Media Player[320kb/s] and "Moments Notice," John Coltrane from Amazon MP3.

6cf1b7a760469dad85c4c47c077a5822

electronics

These headphones work great

question: What do you think about headphone?, context: These headphones work great. They're Sennheisers and you usually can't go wrong with this brand.The headphone reproduces the full range of sounds very clearly and without distortion, if set up properly (I'll get to that).I've been able to walk around my home without experiencing too much distortion. Within the same room as the transmitter, the sound is really clear and robust. It's great not being tethered to one location or having to deal with accidentally yanking the cord out when moving around.Also, unlike my other enclosed-type headphones, the design allow for air to circulate freely. So your ears won't become uncomfortable warm during use. These headphones are very comfortable.As far as specs, you can get a good assessment of the product from reading the Amazon description so I won't go into that.For portable devices with a headphone jack, you simply have to purchase a "2-RCA (female) to headphone jack (male 3.5mm plug) adapter". Make sure the adapter is a "stereo" adapter versus a "mono" adapter. They look exactly the same, so beware. These adapters are pretty inexpensive.I was a little concerned about getting wireless headphones because of all the negative reviews I've read regarding sound quality, interference, etc.Sound quality and hissing can be minimized if you set up properly. Here's a quick "What to do":Portable Players (i.e. CD, MP3, Walkman, etc):1) If the device comes with an output other than the headphone jack, use it. This other output (line-out) is usually a jack that delivers a constant, high (i.e. loud) signal. Regardless of your headphone volume level, this jack will output at a constant, strong, loud signal. These line-out jacks are usually found on the back of some CD players.2) If the device only comes with a headphone jack, set the volume to max or near max. This is the setup I'm using. These headphones were bought primarily to be use at work, so I can listen to my iPod wirelessly.NOTE!!! If you're connected to a dedicated home amp/receivers/etc... DO NOT crank the volume all the way up or even remotely close to it. (The line out on your home amp/receiver will transmit a strong, clear signal regardless of the volume setting, if you're connected to the receiver/amp's line-out)The volume should be set high ONLY for smaller, portable devices that output less power such as an MP3 player or handheld portable CD player. You've been warned;-)Why set the signal coming from your unit as high as possible? It significantly reduces the background noise, since the signal being transmitted is strong. You won't need to turn up the volume on your headset as high since the signal being transmitted is strong. Yes, your portable music player will use up power faster, but who cares? Use a power adapter for your device.If your signal wasn't strong, you would need to increase the headset volume which also increases the level of background hiss. Try it out. I would speculate that a lot of these reviews, which complain of unbearable hissing, are a result of their device's volume level being set low.Hope this info helps. Enjoy the headphones... They're pretty nice.

What do you think about headphone?

These headphones work great .

These headphones work great. They're Sennheisers and you usually can't go wrong with this brand.The headphone reproduces the full range of sounds very clearly and without distortion, if set up properly (I'll get to that).I've been able to walk around my home without experiencing too much distortion. Within the same room as the transmitter, the sound is really clear and robust. It's great not being tethered to one location or having to deal with accidentally yanking the cord out when moving around.Also, unlike my other enclosed-type headphones, the design allow for air to circulate freely. So your ears won't become uncomfortable warm during use. These headphones are very comfortable.As far as specs, you can get a good assessment of the product from reading the Amazon description so I won't go into that.For portable devices with a headphone jack, you simply have to purchase a "2-RCA (female) to headphone jack (male 3.5mm plug) adapter". Make sure the adapter is a "stereo" adapter versus a "mono" adapter. They look exactly the same, so beware. These adapters are pretty inexpensive.I was a little concerned about getting wireless headphones because of all the negative reviews I've read regarding sound quality, interference, etc.Sound quality and hissing can be minimized if you set up properly. Here's a quick "What to do":Portable Players (i.e. CD, MP3, Walkman, etc):1) If the device comes with an output other than the headphone jack, use it. This other output (line-out) is usually a jack that delivers a constant, high (i.e. loud) signal. Regardless of your headphone volume level, this jack will output at a constant, strong, loud signal. These line-out jacks are usually found on the back of some CD players.2) If the device only comes with a headphone jack, set the volume to max or near max. This is the setup I'm using. These headphones were bought primarily to be use at work, so I can listen to my iPod wirelessly.NOTE!!! If you're connected to a dedicated home amp/receivers/etc... DO NOT crank the volume all the way up or even remotely close to it. (The line out on your home amp/receiver will transmit a strong, clear signal regardless of the volume setting, if you're connected to the receiver/amp's line-out)The volume should be set high ONLY for smaller, portable devices that output less power such as an MP3 player or handheld portable CD player. You've been warned;-)Why set the signal coming from your unit as high as possible? It significantly reduces the background noise, since the signal being transmitted is strong. You won't need to turn up the volume on your headset as high since the signal being transmitted is strong. Yes, your portable music player will use up power faster, but who cares? Use a power adapter for your device.If your signal wasn't strong, you would need to increase the headset volume which also increases the level of background hiss. Try it out. I would speculate that a lot of these reviews, which complain of unbearable hissing, are a result of their device's volume level being set low.Hope this info helps. Enjoy the headphones... They're pretty nice.

<hl> These headphones work great <hl> .

<hl> These headphones work great <hl>. They're Sennheisers and you usually can't go wrong with this brand.The headphone reproduces the full range of sounds very clearly and without distortion, if set up properly (I'll get to that).I've been able to walk around my home without experiencing too much distortion. Within the same room as the transmitter, the sound is really clear and robust. It's great not being tethered to one location or having to deal with accidentally yanking the cord out when moving around.Also, unlike my other enclosed-type headphones, the design allow for air to circulate freely. So your ears won't become uncomfortable warm during use. These headphones are very comfortable.As far as specs, you can get a good assessment of the product from reading the Amazon description so I won't go into that.For portable devices with a headphone jack, you simply have to purchase a "2-RCA (female) to headphone jack (male 3.5mm plug) adapter". Make sure the adapter is a "stereo" adapter versus a "mono" adapter. They look exactly the same, so beware. These adapters are pretty inexpensive.I was a little concerned about getting wireless headphones because of all the negative reviews I've read regarding sound quality, interference, etc.Sound quality and hissing can be minimized if you set up properly. Here's a quick "What to do":Portable Players (i.e. CD, MP3, Walkman, etc):1) If the device comes with an output other than the headphone jack, use it. This other output (line-out) is usually a jack that delivers a constant, high (i.e. loud) signal. Regardless of your headphone volume level, this jack will output at a constant, strong, loud signal. These line-out jacks are usually found on the back of some CD players.2) If the device only comes with a headphone jack, set the volume to max or near max. This is the setup I'm using. These headphones were bought primarily to be use at work, so I can listen to my iPod wirelessly.NOTE!!! If you're connected to a dedicated home amp/receivers/etc... DO NOT crank the volume all the way up or even remotely close to it. (The line out on your home amp/receiver will transmit a strong, clear signal regardless of the volume setting, if you're connected to the receiver/amp's line-out)The volume should be set high ONLY for smaller, portable devices that output less power such as an MP3 player or handheld portable CD player. You've been warned;-)Why set the signal coming from your unit as high as possible? It significantly reduces the background noise, since the signal being transmitted is strong. You won't need to turn up the volume on your headset as high since the signal being transmitted is strong. Yes, your portable music player will use up power faster, but who cares? Use a power adapter for your device.If your signal wasn't strong, you would need to increase the headset volume which also increases the level of background hiss. Try it out. I would speculate that a lot of these reviews, which complain of unbearable hissing, are a result of their device's volume level being set low.Hope this info helps. Enjoy the headphones... They're pretty nice.

<hl> These headphones work great . <hl> They're Sennheisers and you usually can't go wrong with this brand. The headphone reproduces the full range of sounds very clearly and without distortion, if set up properly (I'll get to that).I've been able to walk around my home without experiencing too much distortion. Within the same room as the transmitter, the sound is really clear and robust. It's great not being tethered to one location or having to deal with accidentally yanking the cord out when moving around. Also, unlike my other enclosed-type headphones, the design allow for air to circulate freely. So your ears won't become uncomfortable warm during use. These headphones are very comfortable. As far as specs, you can get a good assessment of the product from reading the Amazon description so I won't go into that. For portable devices with a headphone jack, you simply have to purchase a "2-RCA (female) to headphone jack (male 3.5mm plug) adapter". Make sure the adapter is a "stereo" adapter versus a "mono" adapter. They look exactly the same, so beware. These adapters are pretty inexpensive. I was a little concerned about getting wireless headphones because of all the negative reviews I've read regarding sound quality, interference, etc. Sound quality and hissing can be minimized if you set up properly. Here's a quick "What to do":Portable Players (i.e. CD, MP3, Walkman, etc):1) If the device comes with an output other than the headphone jack, use it. This other output (line-out) is usually a jack that delivers a constant, high (i.e. loud) signal. Regardless of your headphone volume level, this jack will output at a constant, strong, loud signal. These line-out jacks are usually found on the back of some CD players.2) If the device only comes with a headphone jack, set the volume to max or near max. This is the setup I'm using. These headphones were bought primarily to be use at work, so I can listen to my iPod wirelessly. NOTE!!! If you're connected to a dedicated home amp/receivers/etc... DO NOT crank the volume all the way up or even remotely close to it. (The line out on your home amp/receiver will transmit a strong, clear signal regardless of the volume setting, if you're connected to the receiver/amp's line-out)The volume should be set high ONLY for smaller, portable devices that output less power such as an MP3 player or handheld portable CD player. You've been warned;-)Why set the signal coming from your unit as high as possible? It significantly reduces the background noise, since the signal being transmitted is strong. You won't need to turn up the volume on your headset as high since the signal being transmitted is strong. Yes, your portable music player will use up power faster, but who cares? Use a power adapter for your device. If your signal wasn't strong, you would need to increase the headset volume which also increases the level of background hiss. Try it out. I would speculate that a lot of these reviews, which complain of unbearable hissing, are a result of their device's volume level being set low. Hope this info helps. Enjoy the headphones... They're pretty nice.

82c414ce23fc2b02536fb27ac5ab00f1

electronics

She likes the look, the feel, the holding of it, the fact the covers flips back

question: How resistant is the cover?, context: I got this for my wife and she loves it. Strangely, their product description doesn't do this item justice.First, they should (in the actual Product description) state it fits the Kindle Paperwhite.Then, they don't mention the elastic closure, similar to MoleSkin notebooks, to keep it from accidentally opening. I debated between this one and another with a magnetic clasp closure. I'm glad I chose this one because the magnetic clasp and closure would be very bulky and magnetics and electronics generally don't mix.She likes the look, the feel, the holding of it, the fact the covers flips back easily and a slim inside pocket for holding things (emergency cash, a business card, etc) and finally the elastic closure that wraps around the cover to keep it closed.The Kindle PaperWhite stays slim and fits into her purse and keeps it protected.Happy wife, happy life, so 5 stars from me! ;-)

How resistant is the cover?

She likes the look, the feel, the holding of it, the fact the covers flips back easily and a slim inside pocket for holding things (emergency cash, a business card, etc) and finally the elastic closure that wraps around the cover to keep it closed.

I got this for my wife and she loves it. Strangely, their product description doesn't do this item justice.First, they should (in the actual Product description) state it fits the Kindle Paperwhite.Then, they don't mention the elastic closure, similar to MoleSkin notebooks, to keep it from accidentally opening. I debated between this one and another with a magnetic clasp closure. I'm glad I chose this one because the magnetic clasp and closure would be very bulky and magnetics and electronics generally don't mix.She likes the look, the feel, the holding of it, the fact the covers flips back easily and a slim inside pocket for holding things (emergency cash, a business card, etc) and finally the elastic closure that wraps around the cover to keep it closed.The Kindle PaperWhite stays slim and fits into her purse and keeps it protected.Happy wife, happy life, so 5 stars from me! ;-)

<hl> She likes the look, the feel, the holding of it, the fact the covers flips back <hl> easily and a slim inside pocket for holding things (emergency cash, a business card, etc) and finally the elastic closure that wraps around the cover to keep it closed.

I got this for my wife and she loves it. Strangely, their product description doesn't do this item justice.First, they should (in the actual Product description) state it fits the Kindle Paperwhite.Then, they don't mention the elastic closure, similar to MoleSkin notebooks, to keep it from accidentally opening. I debated between this one and another with a magnetic clasp closure. I'm glad I chose this one because the magnetic clasp and closure would be very bulky and magnetics and electronics generally don't mix.<hl> She likes the look, the feel, the holding of it, the fact the covers flips back <hl> easily and a slim inside pocket for holding things (emergency cash, a business card, etc) and finally the elastic closure that wraps around the cover to keep it closed.The Kindle PaperWhite stays slim and fits into her purse and keeps it protected.Happy wife, happy life, so 5 stars from me! ;-)

I got this for my wife and she loves it. Strangely, their product description doesn't do this item justice. First, they should (in the actual Product description) state it fits the Kindle Paperwhite. Then, they don't mention the elastic closure, similar to MoleSkin notebooks, to keep it from accidentally opening. I debated between this one and another with a magnetic clasp closure. I'm glad I chose this one because the magnetic clasp and closure would be very bulky and magnetics and electronics generally don't mix. <hl> She likes the look, the feel, the holding of it, the fact the covers flips back easily and a slim inside pocket for holding things (emergency cash, a business card, etc) and finally the elastic closure that wraps around the cover to keep it closed. <hl> The Kindle PaperWhite stays slim and fits into her purse and keeps it protected. Happy wife, happy life, so 5 stars from me! ;-)

ab83a917951bd808f4888da8059cd427

electronics

SOUND: The sound is actually very good for background music

question: How is the sound?, context: There are many times when I just want my background music to follow me to the patio, on the road, in the kitchen, at meetings -- even at the beach. We used to cart around jam boxes with mix tapes, but now our computers, smart phones, tablets and just about any internet connected device can access our online music library. The speakers on these devices are just horrible and sometimes, I don't want to have headphones on. I wanted a nice sounding small unit that would allow me to enjoy music anywhere from just about any device.The JAMBOX is small, easy to use, sounds very good for background music, is an excellent design and even runs on batteries.SIZE: this thing is very small, you can take it anywhere and tuck it away in a place where it almost disappears. All you get is music.DESIGN: These folks included a simple interface that uses only four buttons and voice feedback to tell you how to pair a device, charging status and much more. It comes with a manual, but honestly, you can set this up with no trouble out of the box. It is well constructed with a nice feel. It even looks good.BLUETOOTH CALLING: The bluetooth implementation works for sound and as a speakerphone. I was not purchasing this as a speakerphone but WOW, this things is great for conferencing as long as everyone is in front of it. Yes it has an integrated microphone. Rejection is very good, we could all clearly hear the caller and they could hear us as well.SOUND: The sound is actually very good for background music. You won't get big stereo sound field, excellent imaging, thumping bass or dance party volume levels -- but what you do get is actually quite impressive. The sound is balanced from top to bottom and is actually very natural. Acoustic music with vocals like James Taylor, Nora Jones or Shane Jackman are reproduced with excellent balance and clarity. Electronic pop music can lack the dynamics and extended bass, but the bass you do get is not boomy and sounds very natural. One more thing about the bass, it is actually amazing this little thing puts out as much bass as it does for the size. If you are worried the JAMBOX will not play loud, it will, just not THUMPING loud. Because of the smooth high end and good tonal response, you can listen to this thing for a long time with almost no fatigue.BLUETOOTH MUSIC: As most devices, the BlueTooth audio is not as good as if you use the 1/8 audio jack. If you want the best sound plug your phone or computer into this thing. It will amaze you. You may need to turn your headphone output down some so as not to overdrive the unit. It will get a little distorted. The BlueTooth sound is very good, just not as good as when using the plug. Jawbone does something very interesting with the BlueTooth audio. Some devices with BlueTooth audio can be overdriven with the audio output from the source and will distort in at the higher levels. I play guitar and some distortion is good, but not on prerecorded music. NO! The folks at JamBox know then and use something called compression to dynamically limit the amount of sound from your device to the JAMBOX when your BlueTooth level is to high. This compression can sound like 70's pop radio where all the dynamics form the music are taken out. if this bothers you, turn your device (phone/iPod/computer) BlueTooth volume down until the compression is eliminated then use the volume on the JAMBOX to adjust the sound. BUGE IMPROVEMENT.In summary, of the BT Speakers out, this one is the best value for me. Smaller than the Bose, sounds about as good, super easy to use and has MUCH better sound than the sub $100 solutions. If Steve Jobs were to design a BlueTooth portable music device, it would look like the JAMBOX.

How is the sound?

SOUND: The sound is actually very good for background music .

There are many times when I just want my background music to follow me to the patio, on the road, in the kitchen, at meetings -- even at the beach. We used to cart around jam boxes with mix tapes, but now our computers, smart phones, tablets and just about any internet connected device can access our online music library. The speakers on these devices are just horrible and sometimes, I don't want to have headphones on. I wanted a nice sounding small unit that would allow me to enjoy music anywhere from just about any device.The JAMBOX is small, easy to use, sounds very good for background music, is an excellent design and even runs on batteries.SIZE: this thing is very small, you can take it anywhere and tuck it away in a place where it almost disappears. All you get is music.DESIGN: These folks included a simple interface that uses only four buttons and voice feedback to tell you how to pair a device, charging status and much more. It comes with a manual, but honestly, you can set this up with no trouble out of the box. It is well constructed with a nice feel. It even looks good.BLUETOOTH CALLING: The bluetooth implementation works for sound and as a speakerphone. I was not purchasing this as a speakerphone but WOW, this things is great for conferencing as long as everyone is in front of it. Yes it has an integrated microphone. Rejection is very good, we could all clearly hear the caller and they could hear us as well.SOUND: The sound is actually very good for background music. You won't get big stereo sound field, excellent imaging, thumping bass or dance party volume levels -- but what you do get is actually quite impressive. The sound is balanced from top to bottom and is actually very natural. Acoustic music with vocals like James Taylor, Nora Jones or Shane Jackman are reproduced with excellent balance and clarity. Electronic pop music can lack the dynamics and extended bass, but the bass you do get is not boomy and sounds very natural. One more thing about the bass, it is actually amazing this little thing puts out as much bass as it does for the size. If you are worried the JAMBOX will not play loud, it will, just not THUMPING loud. Because of the smooth high end and good tonal response, you can listen to this thing for a long time with almost no fatigue.BLUETOOTH MUSIC: As most devices, the BlueTooth audio is not as good as if you use the 1/8 audio jack. If you want the best sound plug your phone or computer into this thing. It will amaze you. You may need to turn your headphone output down some so as not to overdrive the unit. It will get a little distorted. The BlueTooth sound is very good, just not as good as when using the plug. Jawbone does something very interesting with the BlueTooth audio. Some devices with BlueTooth audio can be overdriven with the audio output from the source and will distort in at the higher levels. I play guitar and some distortion is good, but not on prerecorded music. NO! The folks at JamBox know then and use something called compression to dynamically limit the amount of sound from your device to the JAMBOX when your BlueTooth level is to high. This compression can sound like 70's pop radio where all the dynamics form the music are taken out. if this bothers you, turn your device (phone/iPod/computer) BlueTooth volume down until the compression is eliminated then use the volume on the JAMBOX to adjust the sound. BUGE IMPROVEMENT.In summary, of the BT Speakers out, this one is the best value for me. Smaller than the Bose, sounds about as good, super easy to use and has MUCH better sound than the sub $100 solutions. If Steve Jobs were to design a BlueTooth portable music device, it would look like the JAMBOX.

<hl> SOUND: The sound is actually very good for background music <hl> .

There are many times when I just want my background music to follow me to the patio, on the road, in the kitchen, at meetings -- even at the beach. We used to cart around jam boxes with mix tapes, but now our computers, smart phones, tablets and just about any internet connected device can access our online music library. The speakers on these devices are just horrible and sometimes, I don't want to have headphones on. I wanted a nice sounding small unit that would allow me to enjoy music anywhere from just about any device.The JAMBOX is small, easy to use, sounds very good for background music, is an excellent design and even runs on batteries.SIZE: this thing is very small, you can take it anywhere and tuck it away in a place where it almost disappears. All you get is music.DESIGN: These folks included a simple interface that uses only four buttons and voice feedback to tell you how to pair a device, charging status and much more. It comes with a manual, but honestly, you can set this up with no trouble out of the box. It is well constructed with a nice feel. It even looks good.BLUETOOTH CALLING: The bluetooth implementation works for sound and as a speakerphone. I was not purchasing this as a speakerphone but WOW, this things is great for conferencing as long as everyone is in front of it. Yes it has an integrated microphone. Rejection is very good, we could all clearly hear the caller and they could hear us as well.<hl> SOUND: The sound is actually very good for background music <hl>. You won't get big stereo sound field, excellent imaging, thumping bass or dance party volume levels -- but what you do get is actually quite impressive. The sound is balanced from top to bottom and is actually very natural. Acoustic music with vocals like James Taylor, Nora Jones or Shane Jackman are reproduced with excellent balance and clarity. Electronic pop music can lack the dynamics and extended bass, but the bass you do get is not boomy and sounds very natural. One more thing about the bass, it is actually amazing this little thing puts out as much bass as it does for the size. If you are worried the JAMBOX will not play loud, it will, just not THUMPING loud. Because of the smooth high end and good tonal response, you can listen to this thing for a long time with almost no fatigue.BLUETOOTH MUSIC: As most devices, the BlueTooth audio is not as good as if you use the 1/8 audio jack. If you want the best sound plug your phone or computer into this thing. It will amaze you. You may need to turn your headphone output down some so as not to overdrive the unit. It will get a little distorted. The BlueTooth sound is very good, just not as good as when using the plug. Jawbone does something very interesting with the BlueTooth audio. Some devices with BlueTooth audio can be overdriven with the audio output from the source and will distort in at the higher levels. I play guitar and some distortion is good, but not on prerecorded music. NO! The folks at JamBox know then and use something called compression to dynamically limit the amount of sound from your device to the JAMBOX when your BlueTooth level is to high. This compression can sound like 70's pop radio where all the dynamics form the music are taken out. if this bothers you, turn your device (phone/iPod/computer) BlueTooth volume down until the compression is eliminated then use the volume on the JAMBOX to adjust the sound. BUGE IMPROVEMENT.In summary, of the BT Speakers out, this one is the best value for me. Smaller than the Bose, sounds about as good, super easy to use and has MUCH better sound than the sub $100 solutions. If Steve Jobs were to design a BlueTooth portable music device, it would look like the JAMBOX.

There are many times when I just want my background music to follow me to the patio, on the road, in the kitchen, at meetings -- even at the beach. We used to cart around jam boxes with mix tapes, but now our computers, smart phones, tablets and just about any internet connected device can access our online music library. The speakers on these devices are just horrible and sometimes, I don't want to have headphones on. I wanted a nice sounding small unit that would allow me to enjoy music anywhere from just about any device. The JAMBOX is small, easy to use, sounds very good for background music, is an excellent design and even runs on batteries. SIZE: this thing is very small, you can take it anywhere and tuck it away in a place where it almost disappears. All you get is music. DESIGN: These folks included a simple interface that uses only four buttons and voice feedback to tell you how to pair a device, charging status and much more. It comes with a manual, but honestly, you can set this up with no trouble out of the box. It is well constructed with a nice feel. It even looks good. BLUETOOTH CALLING: The bluetooth implementation works for sound and as a speakerphone. I was not purchasing this as a speakerphone but WOW, this things is great for conferencing as long as everyone is in front of it. Yes it has an integrated microphone. Rejection is very good, we could all clearly hear the caller and they could hear us as well. <hl> SOUND: The sound is actually very good for background music . <hl> You won't get big stereo sound field, excellent imaging, thumping bass or dance party volume levels -- but what you do get is actually quite impressive. The sound is balanced from top to bottom and is actually very natural. Acoustic music with vocals like James Taylor, Nora Jones or Shane Jackman are reproduced with excellent balance and clarity. Electronic pop music can lack the dynamics and extended bass, but the bass you do get is not boomy and sounds very natural. One more thing about the bass, it is actually amazing this little thing puts out as much bass as it does for the size. If you are worried the JAMBOX will not play loud, it will, just not THUMPING loud. Because of the smooth high end and good tonal response, you can listen to this thing for a long time with almost no fatigue. BLUETOOTH MUSIC: As most devices, the BlueTooth audio is not as good as if you use the 1/8 audio jack. If you want the best sound plug your phone or computer into this thing. It will amaze you. You may need to turn your headphone output down some so as not to overdrive the unit. It will get a little distorted. The BlueTooth sound is very good, just not as good as when using the plug. Jawbone does something very interesting with the BlueTooth audio. Some devices with BlueTooth audio can be overdriven with the audio output from the source and will distort in at the higher levels. I play guitar and some distortion is good, but not on prerecorded music. NO! The folks at JamBox know then and use something called compression to dynamically limit the amount of sound from your device to the JAMBOX when your BlueTooth level is to high. This compression can sound like 70's pop radio where all the dynamics form the music are taken out. if this bothers you, turn your device (phone/iPod/computer) BlueTooth volume down until the compression is eliminated then use the volume on the JAMBOX to adjust the sound. BUGE IMPROVEMENT.In summary, of the BT Speakers out, this one is the best value for me. Smaller than the Bose, sounds about as good, super easy to use and has MUCH better sound than the sub $100 solutions. If Steve Jobs were to design a BlueTooth portable music device, it would look like the JAMBOX.

e9bfd2a5b28a37c2799acd577f6a7852

electronics

bass and lower

question: How is the bass?, context: I have two points to make for the sake of full disclosure before actually writing a review of these headphones. First off, I received a free pair of the M6P headphones in exchange for an honest and unbiased review. I will do my best to deliver on my end of the bargain, with a review written for those wondering if they should spend their hard-earned money on the M6P. Secondly, I have never been an in-ear headphone person. I've used plenty of in-ear headphones in my day, but I have always preferred over-ear headsets as I find them to be, nine out of ten times, much more comfortable and high quality in their sound. That been said, I have been massively impressed by these headphones so far. Let's get to it then, shall we?As with any headphones, primary concern for me is sound. How does the M6P fare in that regard? Surprisingly well. I have never owned a pair of in-ear headphones that has had such a good sound range as these do. Usually, this sort of headset is severely lacking in bass and lower-mid tones, but the M6P has a genuinely fantastic range. Of course, the bass isn't quite what you'd get with over-ear phones, but honestly, it sounds pretty great. A little adjustment to equalization settings is all it takes for it to sound the way I like. Highs, mids, and lows are all distinct and clear, with no one aspect overpowering the others. I've really enjoyed my time with the M6P so far. They also look pretty cool. I got the "clear" option, and it's got a nice clean science fiction look to it. I like it.The M6P has several features that are worth noting as well. The last three or so inches of cords that go into the headphones themselves are made of a much stiffer material than the rest of the cord is. This "memory wire" is there is so you can mold them around your ear, making these headphones perfect to use while exercising or working. I have a physical job that allows me to listen to music while working, and these headphones have been incredibly nice for that. They rarely jostle or fall out. If you're looking for a good set of headphones for use while working out, these are ones I'd give serious consideration. The M6P also has an inline universal control that has a surprisingly large variety of uses for only having a single button, a volume slider, and a built-in microphone. The volume slider is incredibly nice as you don't have to fight to get your iPod/Mp3 player out of your pocket to adjust the volume. Same goes for the single button, which can be use for playing/pausing music and even skipping or restarting tracks depending on how you press it. The mic works pretty well for phone calls too. Overall, the inline universal control is a pretty convenient feature I rather appreciated. It's a pretty high-end feature that I've never had on any in-ear headphones before.The M6P comes in an attractive little box with plenty of accessories in addition to the headphones themselves. There's a really small zip-up case that carries other things in addition to the headphones. There's a really nice folded up users manual that is very helpful in getting acquainted with the product and its various features. There's also a small zip-lock baggy with several different types of rubbery ear tips you can switch out if the default ear-tips don't suit your fancy. I really appreciated the extra ear-tips, as each of the six pairs pretty much guarantees that, no matter what your ears are shaped like, you will be able to enjoy these headphones comfortably. That's great. There's also a little clip that can be used to attach the phones into your shirt or whatever, which is a nice feature that helps keep the pressure off your ears if the cord gets tugged a bit. Overall, a nice package.Truly, these are great headphones, but they're not without some quirks to consider. The memory wire, as great as it is for keeping the phones in your ears, makes it so the headphones take longer to put in than others would be. Once you put the earbuds in your ears, you'll want to make sure you won't need to take them out for a little while. I also found the memory wire a pain to struggle with right out of the box until they had broken in. The memory wire on the right-earbud on mine were particularly stubborn for a little while. Once broken in, however, the memory wire is very easy to make conform to your ears and wroks great. Finally, and this is admittedly a nitpicky gripe, I don't care for the plug-in jack myself. It is angled at 90', with an L-shape. I prefer straight plug-ins for headphones, but that's just my preference, and doesn't really take the quality of the phones down at all. None of these are issues that would keep me away from the M6P, mind you, but they are quirks to keep in mind.All things considered, these are fantastic headphones. I've been supremely surprised by their high quality in comparison to all the other in-ear headphones I've owned. I have friends with high-end in-ear headsets that were twice the price (or higher) as these, but in my opinion, the M6P is much higher quality in terms of sound and has a much more robust feature set. These are a pretty awesome deal at $40! It appears you can get them for even cheaper than that on Amazon too, which astounds me. I'd definitely give these a hearty recommendation at this price. They're a great set of headphones. I hope you found this review helpful. Thanks for reading. Toodles.

How is the bass?

Usually, this sort of headset is severely lacking in bass and lower -mid tones, but the M6P has a genuinely fantastic range.

I have two points to make for the sake of full disclosure before actually writing a review of these headphones. First off, I received a free pair of the M6P headphones in exchange for an honest and unbiased review. I will do my best to deliver on my end of the bargain, with a review written for those wondering if they should spend their hard-earned money on the M6P. Secondly, I have never been an in-ear headphone person. I've used plenty of in-ear headphones in my day, but I have always preferred over-ear headsets as I find them to be, nine out of ten times, much more comfortable and high quality in their sound. That been said, I have been massively impressed by these headphones so far. Let's get to it then, shall we?As with any headphones, primary concern for me is sound. How does the M6P fare in that regard? Surprisingly well. I have never owned a pair of in-ear headphones that has had such a good sound range as these do. Usually, this sort of headset is severely lacking in bass and lower-mid tones, but the M6P has a genuinely fantastic range. Of course, the bass isn't quite what you'd get with over-ear phones, but honestly, it sounds pretty great. A little adjustment to equalization settings is all it takes for it to sound the way I like. Highs, mids, and lows are all distinct and clear, with no one aspect overpowering the others. I've really enjoyed my time with the M6P so far. They also look pretty cool. I got the "clear" option, and it's got a nice clean science fiction look to it. I like it.The M6P has several features that are worth noting as well. The last three or so inches of cords that go into the headphones themselves are made of a much stiffer material than the rest of the cord is. This "memory wire" is there is so you can mold them around your ear, making these headphones perfect to use while exercising or working. I have a physical job that allows me to listen to music while working, and these headphones have been incredibly nice for that. They rarely jostle or fall out. If you're looking for a good set of headphones for use while working out, these are ones I'd give serious consideration. The M6P also has an inline universal control that has a surprisingly large variety of uses for only having a single button, a volume slider, and a built-in microphone. The volume slider is incredibly nice as you don't have to fight to get your iPod/Mp3 player out of your pocket to adjust the volume. Same goes for the single button, which can be use for playing/pausing music and even skipping or restarting tracks depending on how you press it. The mic works pretty well for phone calls too. Overall, the inline universal control is a pretty convenient feature I rather appreciated. It's a pretty high-end feature that I've never had on any in-ear headphones before.The M6P comes in an attractive little box with plenty of accessories in addition to the headphones themselves. There's a really small zip-up case that carries other things in addition to the headphones. There's a really nice folded up users manual that is very helpful in getting acquainted with the product and its various features. There's also a small zip-lock baggy with several different types of rubbery ear tips you can switch out if the default ear-tips don't suit your fancy. I really appreciated the extra ear-tips, as each of the six pairs pretty much guarantees that, no matter what your ears are shaped like, you will be able to enjoy these headphones comfortably. That's great. There's also a little clip that can be used to attach the phones into your shirt or whatever, which is a nice feature that helps keep the pressure off your ears if the cord gets tugged a bit. Overall, a nice package.Truly, these are great headphones, but they're not without some quirks to consider. The memory wire, as great as it is for keeping the phones in your ears, makes it so the headphones take longer to put in than others would be. Once you put the earbuds in your ears, you'll want to make sure you won't need to take them out for a little while. I also found the memory wire a pain to struggle with right out of the box until they had broken in. The memory wire on the right-earbud on mine were particularly stubborn for a little while. Once broken in, however, the memory wire is very easy to make conform to your ears and wroks great. Finally, and this is admittedly a nitpicky gripe, I don't care for the plug-in jack myself. It is angled at 90', with an L-shape. I prefer straight plug-ins for headphones, but that's just my preference, and doesn't really take the quality of the phones down at all. None of these are issues that would keep me away from the M6P, mind you, but they are quirks to keep in mind.All things considered, these are fantastic headphones. I've been supremely surprised by their high quality in comparison to all the other in-ear headphones I've owned. I have friends with high-end in-ear headsets that were twice the price (or higher) as these, but in my opinion, the M6P is much higher quality in terms of sound and has a much more robust feature set. These are a pretty awesome deal at $40! It appears you can get them for even cheaper than that on Amazon too, which astounds me. I'd definitely give these a hearty recommendation at this price. They're a great set of headphones. I hope you found this review helpful. Thanks for reading. Toodles.

Usually, this sort of headset is severely lacking in <hl> bass and lower <hl> -mid tones, but the M6P has a genuinely fantastic range.

I have two points to make for the sake of full disclosure before actually writing a review of these headphones. First off, I received a free pair of the M6P headphones in exchange for an honest and unbiased review. I will do my best to deliver on my end of the bargain, with a review written for those wondering if they should spend their hard-earned money on the M6P. Secondly, I have never been an in-ear headphone person. I've used plenty of in-ear headphones in my day, but I have always preferred over-ear headsets as I find them to be, nine out of ten times, much more comfortable and high quality in their sound. That been said, I have been massively impressed by these headphones so far. Let's get to it then, shall we?As with any headphones, primary concern for me is sound. How does the M6P fare in that regard? Surprisingly well. I have never owned a pair of in-ear headphones that has had such a good sound range as these do. Usually, this sort of headset is severely lacking in <hl> bass and lower <hl>-mid tones, but the M6P has a genuinely fantastic range. Of course, the bass isn't quite what you'd get with over-ear phones, but honestly, it sounds pretty great. A little adjustment to equalization settings is all it takes for it to sound the way I like. Highs, mids, and lows are all distinct and clear, with no one aspect overpowering the others. I've really enjoyed my time with the M6P so far. They also look pretty cool. I got the "clear" option, and it's got a nice clean science fiction look to it. I like it.The M6P has several features that are worth noting as well. The last three or so inches of cords that go into the headphones themselves are made of a much stiffer material than the rest of the cord is. This "memory wire" is there is so you can mold them around your ear, making these headphones perfect to use while exercising or working. I have a physical job that allows me to listen to music while working, and these headphones have been incredibly nice for that. They rarely jostle or fall out. If you're looking for a good set of headphones for use while working out, these are ones I'd give serious consideration. The M6P also has an inline universal control that has a surprisingly large variety of uses for only having a single button, a volume slider, and a built-in microphone. The volume slider is incredibly nice as you don't have to fight to get your iPod/Mp3 player out of your pocket to adjust the volume. Same goes for the single button, which can be use for playing/pausing music and even skipping or restarting tracks depending on how you press it. The mic works pretty well for phone calls too. Overall, the inline universal control is a pretty convenient feature I rather appreciated. It's a pretty high-end feature that I've never had on any in-ear headphones before.The M6P comes in an attractive little box with plenty of accessories in addition to the headphones themselves. There's a really small zip-up case that carries other things in addition to the headphones. There's a really nice folded up users manual that is very helpful in getting acquainted with the product and its various features. There's also a small zip-lock baggy with several different types of rubbery ear tips you can switch out if the default ear-tips don't suit your fancy. I really appreciated the extra ear-tips, as each of the six pairs pretty much guarantees that, no matter what your ears are shaped like, you will be able to enjoy these headphones comfortably. That's great. There's also a little clip that can be used to attach the phones into your shirt or whatever, which is a nice feature that helps keep the pressure off your ears if the cord gets tugged a bit. Overall, a nice package.Truly, these are great headphones, but they're not without some quirks to consider. The memory wire, as great as it is for keeping the phones in your ears, makes it so the headphones take longer to put in than others would be. Once you put the earbuds in your ears, you'll want to make sure you won't need to take them out for a little while. I also found the memory wire a pain to struggle with right out of the box until they had broken in. The memory wire on the right-earbud on mine were particularly stubborn for a little while. Once broken in, however, the memory wire is very easy to make conform to your ears and wroks great. Finally, and this is admittedly a nitpicky gripe, I don't care for the plug-in jack myself. It is angled at 90', with an L-shape. I prefer straight plug-ins for headphones, but that's just my preference, and doesn't really take the quality of the phones down at all. None of these are issues that would keep me away from the M6P, mind you, but they are quirks to keep in mind.All things considered, these are fantastic headphones. I've been supremely surprised by their high quality in comparison to all the other in-ear headphones I've owned. I have friends with high-end in-ear headsets that were twice the price (or higher) as these, but in my opinion, the M6P is much higher quality in terms of sound and has a much more robust feature set. These are a pretty awesome deal at $40! It appears you can get them for even cheaper than that on Amazon too, which astounds me. I'd definitely give these a hearty recommendation at this price. They're a great set of headphones. I hope you found this review helpful. Thanks for reading. Toodles.

I have two points to make for the sake of full disclosure before actually writing a review of these headphones. First off, I received a free pair of the M6P headphones in exchange for an honest and unbiased review. I will do my best to deliver on my end of the bargain, with a review written for those wondering if they should spend their hard-earned money on the M6P. Secondly, I have never been an in-ear headphone person. I've used plenty of in-ear headphones in my day, but I have always preferred over-ear headsets as I find them to be, nine out of ten times, much more comfortable and high quality in their sound. That been said, I have been massively impressed by these headphones so far. Let's get to it then, shall we?As with any headphones, primary concern for me is sound. How does the M6P fare in that regard? Surprisingly well. I have never owned a pair of in-ear headphones that has had such a good sound range as these do. <hl> Usually, this sort of headset is severely lacking in bass and lower -mid tones, but the M6P has a genuinely fantastic range. <hl> Of course, the bass isn't quite what you'd get with over-ear phones, but honestly, it sounds pretty great. A little adjustment to equalization settings is all it takes for it to sound the way I like. Highs, mids, and lows are all distinct and clear, with no one aspect overpowering the others. I've really enjoyed my time with the M6P so far. They also look pretty cool. I got the "clear" option, and it's got a nice clean science fiction look to it. I like it. The M6P has several features that are worth noting as well. The last three or so inches of cords that go into the headphones themselves are made of a much stiffer material than the rest of the cord is. This "memory wire" is there is so you can mold them around your ear, making these headphones perfect to use while exercising or working. I have a physical job that allows me to listen to music while working, and these headphones have been incredibly nice for that. They rarely jostle or fall out. If you're looking for a good set of headphones for use while working out, these are ones I'd give serious consideration. The M6P also has an inline universal control that has a surprisingly large variety of uses for only having a single button, a volume slider, and a built-in microphone. The volume slider is incredibly nice as you don't have to fight to get your iPod/Mp3 player out of your pocket to adjust the volume. Same goes for the single button, which can be use for playing/pausing music and even skipping or restarting tracks depending on how you press it. The mic works pretty well for phone calls too. Overall, the inline universal control is a pretty convenient feature I rather appreciated. It's a pretty high-end feature that I've never had on any in-ear headphones before. The M6P comes in an attractive little box with plenty of accessories in addition to the headphones themselves. There's a really small zip-up case that carries other things in addition to the headphones. There's a really nice folded up users manual that is very helpful in getting acquainted with the product and its various features. There's also a small zip-lock baggy with several different types of rubbery ear tips you can switch out if the default ear-tips don't suit your fancy. I really appreciated the extra ear-tips, as each of the six pairs pretty much guarantees that, no matter what your ears are shaped like, you will be able to enjoy these headphones comfortably. That's great. There's also a little clip that can be used to attach the phones into your shirt or whatever, which is a nice feature that helps keep the pressure off your ears if the cord gets tugged a bit. Overall, a nice package. Truly, these are great headphones, but they're not without some quirks to consider. The memory wire, as great as it is for keeping the phones in your ears, makes it so the headphones take longer to put in than others would be. Once you put the earbuds in your ears, you'll want to make sure you won't need to take them out for a little while. I also found the memory wire a pain to struggle with right out of the box until they had broken in. The memory wire on the right-earbud on mine were particularly stubborn for a little while. Once broken in, however, the memory wire is very easy to make conform to your ears and wroks great. Finally, and this is admittedly a nitpicky gripe, I don't care for the plug-in jack myself. It is angled at 90', with an L-shape. I prefer straight plug-ins for headphones, but that's just my preference, and doesn't really take the quality of the phones down at all. None of these are issues that would keep me away from the M6P, mind you, but they are quirks to keep in mind. All things considered, these are fantastic headphones. I've been supremely surprised by their high quality in comparison to all the other in-ear headphones I've owned. I have friends with high-end in-ear headsets that were twice the price (or higher) as these, but in my opinion, the M6P is much higher quality in terms of sound and has a much more robust feature set. These are a pretty awesome deal at $40! It appears you can get them for even cheaper than that on Amazon too, which astounds me. I'd definitely give these a hearty recommendation at this price. They're a great set of headphones. I hope you found this review helpful. Thanks for reading. Toodles.

8ea8e1a7c31b62a9fc5c838db5f21afc

electronics

the screen gets you to

question: How do you like the screen?, context: I was shopping around for a Windows based tablet for the past 6 months. Kept looking at the Microsoft Surface RT (didn't want to pay the price of the pro) and also looking here at ASUS and Lenovo. When I saw the Venue come out I wanted to touch one so went to the Microsoft Store a few blocks from my office. I spent about an hour going back and forth between the Suface 2 and the Venue. The main reason was size and comparison between RT and Full Windows 8.1. I wanted something that splits between a PC, Tablet, and eReader (huge Kindle fan). After thinking about what my life would be like sitting on an Airplane and what would be more comfortable to work with I picked the Venue 8 Pro. I have had this for about 4 days now (bought at Microsoft Store, price was the same as prime and I was in an instant satisfaction mode).What I like:1. Size, this is large enough that the office tools, apps, and web browsing are functional2. It keeps my Kindle on my night stand when I travel. I was using my Windows Phone and it worked find but it was a bit small and this is much better and holds like my Kindle3. It is full blown Windows, not RT so I can load my other apps on it4. The disk space is good, with 64G it leaves over 30G to use, I added a 32G MicroSD card to it and can't think of how I will run out of space.5. Full Windows from the start screen is familiar, don't need to learn anything new. Not a huge fan of Windows 8 but on a tablet it works great.What I don't like:Configuring Windows 8.1 on a small device is a bit tedious, so need to be patient on the setups and get a stylus (I had one).The few comments on the start button being on the side really isn't an issue, a left swipe from the right side of the screen gets you to start very quickly. So far battery is great, I did remove the dimming and put my own setting on. I got alittle over 9 hours on the battery that way and other than international flights don't know when I wouldn't be in a position to charge it throughout the day.The screen is good, I added a bluetooth keyboard / case to this and still getting used to the keyboard. The split keyboard on screen actually works well in the hand and I may toss the bluetooth keyboard. I don't plan on writing documents on this and mostly for email, reading, and browsing.Already put Pandora on it, sounds OK with the speaker. Have Sonos at home and have that installed as well as few other apps I like. Really don't need thousands of apps and there are enough to make this fully functional for my use.The last point is I didn't buy an Apple because they just charge too much for the brand. I actually had a significant amount of interest from the iPAD users who started to go look at reviews on this after they saw it. $349 for a Full Windows 8 tablet with 64G, 8&#34; screen (Kindle form factor) is hard to ignore.Go ahead and buy it, you will like it for utility.

How do you like the screen?

What I don't like:Configuring Windows 8.1 on a small device is a bit tedious, so need to be patient on the setups and get a stylus (I had one).The few comments on the start button being on the side really isn't an issue, a left swipe from the right side of the screen gets you to start very quickly.

I was shopping around for a Windows based tablet for the past 6 months. Kept looking at the Microsoft Surface RT (didn't want to pay the price of the pro) and also looking here at ASUS and Lenovo. When I saw the Venue come out I wanted to touch one so went to the Microsoft Store a few blocks from my office. I spent about an hour going back and forth between the Suface 2 and the Venue. The main reason was size and comparison between RT and Full Windows 8.1. I wanted something that splits between a PC, Tablet, and eReader (huge Kindle fan). After thinking about what my life would be like sitting on an Airplane and what would be more comfortable to work with I picked the Venue 8 Pro. I have had this for about 4 days now (bought at Microsoft Store, price was the same as prime and I was in an instant satisfaction mode).What I like:1. Size, this is large enough that the office tools, apps, and web browsing are functional2. It keeps my Kindle on my night stand when I travel. I was using my Windows Phone and it worked find but it was a bit small and this is much better and holds like my Kindle3. It is full blown Windows, not RT so I can load my other apps on it4. The disk space is good, with 64G it leaves over 30G to use, I added a 32G MicroSD card to it and can't think of how I will run out of space.5. Full Windows from the start screen is familiar, don't need to learn anything new. Not a huge fan of Windows 8 but on a tablet it works great.What I don't like:Configuring Windows 8.1 on a small device is a bit tedious, so need to be patient on the setups and get a stylus (I had one).The few comments on the start button being on the side really isn't an issue, a left swipe from the right side of the screen gets you to start very quickly. So far battery is great, I did remove the dimming and put my own setting on. I got alittle over 9 hours on the battery that way and other than international flights don't know when I wouldn't be in a position to charge it throughout the day.The screen is good, I added a bluetooth keyboard / case to this and still getting used to the keyboard. The split keyboard on screen actually works well in the hand and I may toss the bluetooth keyboard. I don't plan on writing documents on this and mostly for email, reading, and browsing.Already put Pandora on it, sounds OK with the speaker. Have Sonos at home and have that installed as well as few other apps I like. Really don't need thousands of apps and there are enough to make this fully functional for my use.The last point is I didn't buy an Apple because they just charge too much for the brand. I actually had a significant amount of interest from the iPAD users who started to go look at reviews on this after they saw it. $349 for a Full Windows 8 tablet with 64G, 8&#34; screen (Kindle form factor) is hard to ignore.Go ahead and buy it, you will like it for utility.

What I don't like:Configuring Windows 8.1 on a small device is a bit tedious, so need to be patient on the setups and get a stylus (I had one).The few comments on the start button being on the side really isn't an issue, a left swipe from the right side of <hl> the screen gets you to <hl> start very quickly.

I was shopping around for a Windows based tablet for the past 6 months. Kept looking at the Microsoft Surface RT (didn't want to pay the price of the pro) and also looking here at ASUS and Lenovo. When I saw the Venue come out I wanted to touch one so went to the Microsoft Store a few blocks from my office. I spent about an hour going back and forth between the Suface 2 and the Venue. The main reason was size and comparison between RT and Full Windows 8.1. I wanted something that splits between a PC, Tablet, and eReader (huge Kindle fan). After thinking about what my life would be like sitting on an Airplane and what would be more comfortable to work with I picked the Venue 8 Pro. I have had this for about 4 days now (bought at Microsoft Store, price was the same as prime and I was in an instant satisfaction mode).What I like:1. Size, this is large enough that the office tools, apps, and web browsing are functional2. It keeps my Kindle on my night stand when I travel. I was using my Windows Phone and it worked find but it was a bit small and this is much better and holds like my Kindle3. It is full blown Windows, not RT so I can load my other apps on it4. The disk space is good, with 64G it leaves over 30G to use, I added a 32G MicroSD card to it and can't think of how I will run out of space.5. Full Windows from the start screen is familiar, don't need to learn anything new. Not a huge fan of Windows 8 but on a tablet it works great.What I don't like:Configuring Windows 8.1 on a small device is a bit tedious, so need to be patient on the setups and get a stylus (I had one).The few comments on the start button being on the side really isn't an issue, a left swipe from the right side of <hl> the screen gets you to <hl> start very quickly. So far battery is great, I did remove the dimming and put my own setting on. I got alittle over 9 hours on the battery that way and other than international flights don't know when I wouldn't be in a position to charge it throughout the day.The screen is good, I added a bluetooth keyboard / case to this and still getting used to the keyboard. The split keyboard on screen actually works well in the hand and I may toss the bluetooth keyboard. I don't plan on writing documents on this and mostly for email, reading, and browsing.Already put Pandora on it, sounds OK with the speaker. Have Sonos at home and have that installed as well as few other apps I like. Really don't need thousands of apps and there are enough to make this fully functional for my use.The last point is I didn't buy an Apple because they just charge too much for the brand. I actually had a significant amount of interest from the iPAD users who started to go look at reviews on this after they saw it. $349 for a Full Windows 8 tablet with 64G, 8&#34; screen (Kindle form factor) is hard to ignore.Go ahead and buy it, you will like it for utility.

I was shopping around for a Windows based tablet for the past 6 months. Kept looking at the Microsoft Surface RT (didn't want to pay the price of the pro) and also looking here at ASUS and Lenovo. When I saw the Venue come out I wanted to touch one so went to the Microsoft Store a few blocks from my office. I spent about an hour going back and forth between the Suface 2 and the Venue. The main reason was size and comparison between RT and Full Windows 8.1. I wanted something that splits between a PC, Tablet, and eReader (huge Kindle fan). After thinking about what my life would be like sitting on an Airplane and what would be more comfortable to work with I picked the Venue 8 Pro. I have had this for about 4 days now (bought at Microsoft Store, price was the same as prime and I was in an instant satisfaction mode).What I like:1. Size, this is large enough that the office tools, apps, and web browsing are functional2. It keeps my Kindle on my night stand when I travel. I was using my Windows Phone and it worked find but it was a bit small and this is much better and holds like my Kindle3. It is full blown Windows, not RT so I can load my other apps on it4. The disk space is good, with 64G it leaves over 30G to use, I added a 32G MicroSD card to it and can't think of how I will run out of space.5. Full Windows from the start screen is familiar, don't need to learn anything new. Not a huge fan of Windows 8 but on a tablet it works great. <hl> What I don't like:Configuring Windows 8.1 on a small device is a bit tedious, so need to be patient on the setups and get a stylus (I had one).The few comments on the start button being on the side really isn't an issue, a left swipe from the right side of the screen gets you to start very quickly. <hl> So far battery is great, I did remove the dimming and put my own setting on. I got alittle over 9 hours on the battery that way and other than international flights don't know when I wouldn't be in a position to charge it throughout the day. The screen is good, I added a bluetooth keyboard / case to this and still getting used to the keyboard. The split keyboard on screen actually works well in the hand and I may toss the bluetooth keyboard. I don't plan on writing documents on this and mostly for email, reading, and browsing. Already put Pandora on it, sounds OK with the speaker. Have Sonos at home and have that installed as well as few other apps I like. Really don't need thousands of apps and there are enough to make this fully functional for my use. The last point is I didn't buy an Apple because they just charge too much for the brand. I actually had a significant amount of interest from the iPAD users who started to go look at reviews on this after they saw it. $349 for a Full Windows 8 tablet with 64G, 8&#34; screen (Kindle form factor) is hard to ignore. Go ahead and buy it, you will like it for utility.

f334c26b183b29d63901f99527fd5cbc

electronics

the bass has solidly found its place without trying to overpower the whole track

question: How is the bass?, context: Reading many of the reviews on here, they recommended to use these headphones for at the very least 24 hours straight before giving them good field use. Turns out, they're all correct.When I first bought the Image S4's at a local best buy, they sounded "pretty" good out of the box, but they also sounded pretty painful in certain frequency ranges -- in the treble most notably. "S" and "ch" sounds in lyrics would punch my ears in the face and make me wince. Songs had a certain shrilling tinny quality to it, that was definitely not comfortable. Well, I left the S4's on my desk plugged into my Zune HD overnight, playing music at random. About 18 hours later, I can already hear a massive appreciable difference in the sound quality. The treble has softened back to a beautiful balance with the mids, no more shrilling pain from lyrics, and the bass has solidly found its place without trying to overpower the whole track. At lower volumes, the bass, mids, and treble are easily audible and full -- which was not the case before, where the bass would drop out, and the treble would overpower the mids.My opinion on the S4's went from "If things don't improve, I will return them," to "FOUND A KEEPER HERE." -- And that's only with about a three-quarters of a day worth of burn-in! Most people recommend at least two to three days worth of burn-in to get the truly wonderful sound these headphones are capable of producing. I'm interested to see just how much they'll get from here in the coming hours.Elsewhere, the S4's fit my ears superbly. The oval tips on the buds fit perfectly into my canals. I don't get any discomfort from the build of pressure as I push them in -- the design seems to allow excess air to escape very well. This also means that then I put them in, I've yet to hear the speaker "crinkle." The other nice part about the oval design is that if I pull the muscles around my ear to make my ear stretch upward, the seal on the buds are not lost, which always happened on my old Lenntek Sonix. I would have preferred to have seen a braided cord on these, and the buds made from milled aluminum billets to really add some durability value to these, but they're quality isn't lacking as-is. The cord feels a bit thin, (not weak, just thin,) but at least klipsch added some of the best stress-relief shielding I've seen on a pair of buds. You won't see your cable weaken and drop signal on these for a long, long time -- if ever.I've trusted Klipsch before to impress me with my choice of desktop / entertainment center speakers, so when it was time to get new headphones, I thought I would place trust on them again -- and sure enough I'm not disappointed.

How is the bass?

The treble has softened back to a beautiful balance with the mids, no more shrilling pain from lyrics, and the bass has solidly found its place without trying to overpower the whole track .

Reading many of the reviews on here, they recommended to use these headphones for at the very least 24 hours straight before giving them good field use. Turns out, they're all correct.When I first bought the Image S4's at a local best buy, they sounded "pretty" good out of the box, but they also sounded pretty painful in certain frequency ranges -- in the treble most notably. "S" and "ch" sounds in lyrics would punch my ears in the face and make me wince. Songs had a certain shrilling tinny quality to it, that was definitely not comfortable. Well, I left the S4's on my desk plugged into my Zune HD overnight, playing music at random. About 18 hours later, I can already hear a massive appreciable difference in the sound quality. The treble has softened back to a beautiful balance with the mids, no more shrilling pain from lyrics, and the bass has solidly found its place without trying to overpower the whole track. At lower volumes, the bass, mids, and treble are easily audible and full -- which was not the case before, where the bass would drop out, and the treble would overpower the mids.My opinion on the S4's went from "If things don't improve, I will return them," to "FOUND A KEEPER HERE." -- And that's only with about a three-quarters of a day worth of burn-in! Most people recommend at least two to three days worth of burn-in to get the truly wonderful sound these headphones are capable of producing. I'm interested to see just how much they'll get from here in the coming hours.Elsewhere, the S4's fit my ears superbly. The oval tips on the buds fit perfectly into my canals. I don't get any discomfort from the build of pressure as I push them in -- the design seems to allow excess air to escape very well. This also means that then I put them in, I've yet to hear the speaker "crinkle." The other nice part about the oval design is that if I pull the muscles around my ear to make my ear stretch upward, the seal on the buds are not lost, which always happened on my old Lenntek Sonix. I would have preferred to have seen a braided cord on these, and the buds made from milled aluminum billets to really add some durability value to these, but they're quality isn't lacking as-is. The cord feels a bit thin, (not weak, just thin,) but at least klipsch added some of the best stress-relief shielding I've seen on a pair of buds. You won't see your cable weaken and drop signal on these for a long, long time -- if ever.I've trusted Klipsch before to impress me with my choice of desktop / entertainment center speakers, so when it was time to get new headphones, I thought I would place trust on them again -- and sure enough I'm not disappointed.

The treble has softened back to a beautiful balance with the mids, no more shrilling pain from lyrics, and <hl> the bass has solidly found its place without trying to overpower the whole track <hl> .

Reading many of the reviews on here, they recommended to use these headphones for at the very least 24 hours straight before giving them good field use. Turns out, they're all correct.When I first bought the Image S4's at a local best buy, they sounded "pretty" good out of the box, but they also sounded pretty painful in certain frequency ranges -- in the treble most notably. "S" and "ch" sounds in lyrics would punch my ears in the face and make me wince. Songs had a certain shrilling tinny quality to it, that was definitely not comfortable. Well, I left the S4's on my desk plugged into my Zune HD overnight, playing music at random. About 18 hours later, I can already hear a massive appreciable difference in the sound quality. The treble has softened back to a beautiful balance with the mids, no more shrilling pain from lyrics, and <hl> the bass has solidly found its place without trying to overpower the whole track <hl>. At lower volumes, the bass, mids, and treble are easily audible and full -- which was not the case before, where the bass would drop out, and the treble would overpower the mids.My opinion on the S4's went from "If things don't improve, I will return them," to "FOUND A KEEPER HERE." -- And that's only with about a three-quarters of a day worth of burn-in! Most people recommend at least two to three days worth of burn-in to get the truly wonderful sound these headphones are capable of producing. I'm interested to see just how much they'll get from here in the coming hours.Elsewhere, the S4's fit my ears superbly. The oval tips on the buds fit perfectly into my canals. I don't get any discomfort from the build of pressure as I push them in -- the design seems to allow excess air to escape very well. This also means that then I put them in, I've yet to hear the speaker "crinkle." The other nice part about the oval design is that if I pull the muscles around my ear to make my ear stretch upward, the seal on the buds are not lost, which always happened on my old Lenntek Sonix. I would have preferred to have seen a braided cord on these, and the buds made from milled aluminum billets to really add some durability value to these, but they're quality isn't lacking as-is. The cord feels a bit thin, (not weak, just thin,) but at least klipsch added some of the best stress-relief shielding I've seen on a pair of buds. You won't see your cable weaken and drop signal on these for a long, long time -- if ever.I've trusted Klipsch before to impress me with my choice of desktop / entertainment center speakers, so when it was time to get new headphones, I thought I would place trust on them again -- and sure enough I'm not disappointed.

Reading many of the reviews on here, they recommended to use these headphones for at the very least 24 hours straight before giving them good field use. Turns out, they're all correct. When I first bought the Image S4's at a local best buy, they sounded "pretty" good out of the box, but they also sounded pretty painful in certain frequency ranges -- in the treble most notably. "S" and "ch" sounds in lyrics would punch my ears in the face and make me wince. Songs had a certain shrilling tinny quality to it, that was definitely not comfortable. Well, I left the S4's on my desk plugged into my Zune HD overnight, playing music at random. About 18 hours later, I can already hear a massive appreciable difference in the sound quality. <hl> The treble has softened back to a beautiful balance with the mids, no more shrilling pain from lyrics, and the bass has solidly found its place without trying to overpower the whole track . <hl> At lower volumes, the bass, mids, and treble are easily audible and full -- which was not the case before, where the bass would drop out, and the treble would overpower the mids. My opinion on the S4's went from "If things don't improve, I will return them," to "FOUND A KEEPER HERE." -- And that's only with about a three-quarters of a day worth of burn-in! Most people recommend at least two to three days worth of burn-in to get the truly wonderful sound these headphones are capable of producing. I'm interested to see just how much they'll get from here in the coming hours. Elsewhere, the S4's fit my ears superbly. The oval tips on the buds fit perfectly into my canals. I don't get any discomfort from the build of pressure as I push them in -- the design seems to allow excess air to escape very well. This also means that then I put them in, I've yet to hear the speaker "crinkle." The other nice part about the oval design is that if I pull the muscles around my ear to make my ear stretch upward, the seal on the buds are not lost, which always happened on my old Lenntek Sonix. I would have preferred to have seen a braided cord on these, and the buds made from milled aluminum billets to really add some durability value to these, but they're quality isn't lacking as-is. The cord feels a bit thin, (not weak, just thin,) but at least klipsch added some of the best stress-relief shielding I've seen on a pair of buds. You won't see your cable weaken and drop signal on these for a long, long time -- if ever. I've trusted Klipsch before to impress me with my choice of desktop / entertainment center speakers, so when it was time to get new headphones, I thought I would place trust on them again -- and sure enough I'm not disappointed.

48b234c4910c89bdfd03ae1e08b0e2f2

electronics

Case works perfectly, keyboard feels great and the hotkeys are amazing

question: What are the camera features?, context: Case works perfectly, keyboard feels great and the hotkeys are amazing! I was going to buy another case for 100 dollars at BB, but found this one on Amazon, and I am so happy I bought this one.One thing I do wish it had was magnets on the two bottom resting metals that hold the ipad when it is standing in landscape or portrait, cause if you accidentally tilt the ipad to much backwards, then the ipad has no locking mechanism to stay put and may fall backwards. This is really not a deal breaker for me cause i already know its like that so Im just more careful. Only problem maybe when someone that doesnt know about it, may pickup my ipad and not realize it and it may fall backwards. So a magnetic strong enough force to keep it standing would be an awesome upgrade.Overall, I am so happy. Many walk by and say, hey that is a nice little Pc, then I tell them its an ipad. they say WOW, that is so awesome. Case looks really professional and protects the Ipad big time!I recommend anyone to buy it! especially at this great price!

What are the camera features?

Case works perfectly, keyboard feels great and the hotkeys are amazing !

Case works perfectly, keyboard feels great and the hotkeys are amazing! I was going to buy another case for 100 dollars at BB, but found this one on Amazon, and I am so happy I bought this one.One thing I do wish it had was magnets on the two bottom resting metals that hold the ipad when it is standing in landscape or portrait, cause if you accidentally tilt the ipad to much backwards, then the ipad has no locking mechanism to stay put and may fall backwards. This is really not a deal breaker for me cause i already know its like that so Im just more careful. Only problem maybe when someone that doesnt know about it, may pickup my ipad and not realize it and it may fall backwards. So a magnetic strong enough force to keep it standing would be an awesome upgrade.Overall, I am so happy. Many walk by and say, hey that is a nice little Pc, then I tell them its an ipad. they say WOW, that is so awesome. Case looks really professional and protects the Ipad big time!I recommend anyone to buy it! especially at this great price!

<hl> Case works perfectly, keyboard feels great and the hotkeys are amazing <hl> !

<hl> Case works perfectly, keyboard feels great and the hotkeys are amazing <hl>! I was going to buy another case for 100 dollars at BB, but found this one on Amazon, and I am so happy I bought this one.One thing I do wish it had was magnets on the two bottom resting metals that hold the ipad when it is standing in landscape or portrait, cause if you accidentally tilt the ipad to much backwards, then the ipad has no locking mechanism to stay put and may fall backwards. This is really not a deal breaker for me cause i already know its like that so Im just more careful. Only problem maybe when someone that doesnt know about it, may pickup my ipad and not realize it and it may fall backwards. So a magnetic strong enough force to keep it standing would be an awesome upgrade.Overall, I am so happy. Many walk by and say, hey that is a nice little Pc, then I tell them its an ipad. they say WOW, that is so awesome. Case looks really professional and protects the Ipad big time!I recommend anyone to buy it! especially at this great price!

<hl> Case works perfectly, keyboard feels great and the hotkeys are amazing ! <hl> I was going to buy another case for 100 dollars at BB, but found this one on Amazon, and I am so happy I bought this one. One thing I do wish it had was magnets on the two bottom resting metals that hold the ipad when it is standing in landscape or portrait, cause if you accidentally tilt the ipad to much backwards, then the ipad has no locking mechanism to stay put and may fall backwards. This is really not a deal breaker for me cause i already know its like that so Im just more careful. Only problem maybe when someone that doesnt know about it, may pickup my ipad and not realize it and it may fall backwards. So a magnetic strong enough force to keep it standing would be an awesome upgrade. Overall, I am so happy. Many walk by and say, hey that is a nice little Pc, then I tell them its an ipad. they say WOW, that is so awesome. Case looks really professional and protects the Ipad big time!I recommend anyone to buy it! especially at this great price!

7a0136d924fa5eab05b4d2df59aea1f4

electronics

Speakers are better that the iPad 2

question: How is the speaker?, context: I like watching movies on it, or listening to music. But the Silk web browser kinda sucks. After owning an iPad, this seems a bit awkward to use. Web browsing is slow. Picture is great. Speakers are better that the iPad 2 I had.I'd rate it a 3 star, but because of the price, I had to give it an extra star.Battery is a little weak too, I'm thinking mine, might have a problem. 4 hours of surfing and Netflix is all I get of it!If you don't want to shell out the $ for an iPad... this will do for the price.

How is the speaker?

Speakers are better that the iPad 2 I had.I'd rate it a 3 star, but because of the price, I had to give it an extra star.

I like watching movies on it, or listening to music. But the Silk web browser kinda sucks. After owning an iPad, this seems a bit awkward to use. Web browsing is slow. Picture is great. Speakers are better that the iPad 2 I had.I'd rate it a 3 star, but because of the price, I had to give it an extra star.Battery is a little weak too, I'm thinking mine, might have a problem. 4 hours of surfing and Netflix is all I get of it!If you don't want to shell out the $ for an iPad... this will do for the price.

<hl> Speakers are better that the iPad 2 <hl> I had.I'd rate it a 3 star, but because of the price, I had to give it an extra star.

I like watching movies on it, or listening to music. But the Silk web browser kinda sucks. After owning an iPad, this seems a bit awkward to use. Web browsing is slow. Picture is great. <hl> Speakers are better that the iPad 2 <hl> I had.I'd rate it a 3 star, but because of the price, I had to give it an extra star.Battery is a little weak too, I'm thinking mine, might have a problem. 4 hours of surfing and Netflix is all I get of it!If you don't want to shell out the $ for an iPad... this will do for the price.

I like watching movies on it, or listening to music. But the Silk web browser kinda sucks. After owning an iPad, this seems a bit awkward to use. Web browsing is slow. Picture is great. <hl> Speakers are better that the iPad 2 I had.I'd rate it a 3 star, but because of the price, I had to give it an extra star. <hl> Battery is a little weak too, I'm thinking mine, might have a problem. 4 hours of surfing and Netflix is all I get of it!If you don't want to shell out the $ for an iPad... this will do for the price.

ebd030491f18fa5484b2b7ddc813e73c

electronics

but I have the same issue with the volume through the TV which is connected using HDMI

question: Do you have a big problem?, context: I kept this unit for about a week before deciding to return it. It is not terrible at all, but a couple items were real dealbreakers for me:1) Low volume level on DVD and Blu-Ray playbackThis must be something specific to LG. I have an LG DVR (LRM-519) that is a few years old and it has the exact same problem. When I play Blu-Ray discs or regular DVDs, I have to turn the volume on my TV or Sony AV Receiver way, way up just to hear the movie at a normal level. I was watching Baby Mama and had to crank my Receiver up to the max volume just to hear it. It is connected with an optical cable, but I have the same issue with the volume through the TV which is connected using HDMI. I previously had my Xbox 360 connected to my AV Receiver and DVDs sounded amazing. I didn't have to turn up the receiver past 45 to get it really booming. With the LG BD 370, I had to crank it at 70 (max).2) The player uses the same remote IR commands as my LG DVRVery few other people will probably run into this problem, but the BD 370 happens to use the same remote control commands as my existing LG DVR. So, for example, when I turn on the BD 370, the DVR also turns on. When I press the Open/Close button on the remote, the DVD tray on both my DVR and Blu-Ray player open. When I press Menu on the remote, it brings up the menu on my DVR and my blu-ray player. This was just an annoyance at first until I realized that watching netflix or a bluray disc on the BD 370 could actually cause me to stop something from recording on my DVR due to the random command being sent to the DVR as I control the blu-ray player.3) Netflix only shows Instant QueueI admit, this is a very minor gripe, but I really got spoiled by the Netflix experience on my Xbox 360. On the xbox 360, the netflix menu shows not only the movies you have added to your instant queue, but also lets you browse a selection of shows/movies in other categories. I have found that I use that feature a lot. So I was pretty disappointed to see that it isn't replicated on the BD 370. However, the quality of the streaming on the BD 370 was every bit as good as on the Xbox 360. Also, I had zero problems connecting to netflix when I hooked up the player. I just connected the player to my router with an ethernet cable and it had no problem getting on netflix.Pro - The ability to watch Youtube on the BD 370 was cool, especially because it allowed me to log into my Youtube account and access my favorites. However, that was not enough to make me want to keep the player.All in all, if you don't mind the low volume level and you don't have any other LG DVD players or DVRs connected to the same TV as the BD 370, it is a pretty decent unit.

Do you have a big problem?

It is connected with an optical cable, but I have the same issue with the volume through the TV which is connected using HDMI .

I kept this unit for about a week before deciding to return it. It is not terrible at all, but a couple items were real dealbreakers for me:1) Low volume level on DVD and Blu-Ray playbackThis must be something specific to LG. I have an LG DVR (LRM-519) that is a few years old and it has the exact same problem. When I play Blu-Ray discs or regular DVDs, I have to turn the volume on my TV or Sony AV Receiver way, way up just to hear the movie at a normal level. I was watching Baby Mama and had to crank my Receiver up to the max volume just to hear it. It is connected with an optical cable, but I have the same issue with the volume through the TV which is connected using HDMI. I previously had my Xbox 360 connected to my AV Receiver and DVDs sounded amazing. I didn't have to turn up the receiver past 45 to get it really booming. With the LG BD 370, I had to crank it at 70 (max).2) The player uses the same remote IR commands as my LG DVRVery few other people will probably run into this problem, but the BD 370 happens to use the same remote control commands as my existing LG DVR. So, for example, when I turn on the BD 370, the DVR also turns on. When I press the Open/Close button on the remote, the DVD tray on both my DVR and Blu-Ray player open. When I press Menu on the remote, it brings up the menu on my DVR and my blu-ray player. This was just an annoyance at first until I realized that watching netflix or a bluray disc on the BD 370 could actually cause me to stop something from recording on my DVR due to the random command being sent to the DVR as I control the blu-ray player.3) Netflix only shows Instant QueueI admit, this is a very minor gripe, but I really got spoiled by the Netflix experience on my Xbox 360. On the xbox 360, the netflix menu shows not only the movies you have added to your instant queue, but also lets you browse a selection of shows/movies in other categories. I have found that I use that feature a lot. So I was pretty disappointed to see that it isn't replicated on the BD 370. However, the quality of the streaming on the BD 370 was every bit as good as on the Xbox 360. Also, I had zero problems connecting to netflix when I hooked up the player. I just connected the player to my router with an ethernet cable and it had no problem getting on netflix.Pro - The ability to watch Youtube on the BD 370 was cool, especially because it allowed me to log into my Youtube account and access my favorites. However, that was not enough to make me want to keep the player.All in all, if you don't mind the low volume level and you don't have any other LG DVD players or DVRs connected to the same TV as the BD 370, it is a pretty decent unit.

It is connected with an optical cable, <hl> but I have the same issue with the volume through the TV which is connected using HDMI <hl> .

I kept this unit for about a week before deciding to return it. It is not terrible at all, but a couple items were real dealbreakers for me:1) Low volume level on DVD and Blu-Ray playbackThis must be something specific to LG. I have an LG DVR (LRM-519) that is a few years old and it has the exact same problem. When I play Blu-Ray discs or regular DVDs, I have to turn the volume on my TV or Sony AV Receiver way, way up just to hear the movie at a normal level. I was watching Baby Mama and had to crank my Receiver up to the max volume just to hear it. It is connected with an optical cable, <hl> but I have the same issue with the volume through the TV which is connected using HDMI <hl>. I previously had my Xbox 360 connected to my AV Receiver and DVDs sounded amazing. I didn't have to turn up the receiver past 45 to get it really booming. With the LG BD 370, I had to crank it at 70 (max).2) The player uses the same remote IR commands as my LG DVRVery few other people will probably run into this problem, but the BD 370 happens to use the same remote control commands as my existing LG DVR. So, for example, when I turn on the BD 370, the DVR also turns on. When I press the Open/Close button on the remote, the DVD tray on both my DVR and Blu-Ray player open. When I press Menu on the remote, it brings up the menu on my DVR and my blu-ray player. This was just an annoyance at first until I realized that watching netflix or a bluray disc on the BD 370 could actually cause me to stop something from recording on my DVR due to the random command being sent to the DVR as I control the blu-ray player.3) Netflix only shows Instant QueueI admit, this is a very minor gripe, but I really got spoiled by the Netflix experience on my Xbox 360. On the xbox 360, the netflix menu shows not only the movies you have added to your instant queue, but also lets you browse a selection of shows/movies in other categories. I have found that I use that feature a lot. So I was pretty disappointed to see that it isn't replicated on the BD 370. However, the quality of the streaming on the BD 370 was every bit as good as on the Xbox 360. Also, I had zero problems connecting to netflix when I hooked up the player. I just connected the player to my router with an ethernet cable and it had no problem getting on netflix.Pro - The ability to watch Youtube on the BD 370 was cool, especially because it allowed me to log into my Youtube account and access my favorites. However, that was not enough to make me want to keep the player.All in all, if you don't mind the low volume level and you don't have any other LG DVD players or DVRs connected to the same TV as the BD 370, it is a pretty decent unit.

I kept this unit for about a week before deciding to return it. It is not terrible at all, but a couple items were real dealbreakers for me:1) Low volume level on DVD and Blu-Ray playbackThis must be something specific to LG. I have an LG DVR (LRM-519) that is a few years old and it has the exact same problem. When I play Blu-Ray discs or regular DVDs, I have to turn the volume on my TV or Sony AV Receiver way, way up just to hear the movie at a normal level. I was watching Baby Mama and had to crank my Receiver up to the max volume just to hear it. <hl> It is connected with an optical cable, but I have the same issue with the volume through the TV which is connected using HDMI . <hl> I previously had my Xbox 360 connected to my AV Receiver and DVDs sounded amazing. I didn't have to turn up the receiver past 45 to get it really booming. With the LG BD 370, I had to crank it at 70 (max).2) The player uses the same remote IR commands as my LG DVRVery few other people will probably run into this problem, but the BD 370 happens to use the same remote control commands as my existing LG DVR. So, for example, when I turn on the BD 370, the DVR also turns on. When I press the Open/Close button on the remote, the DVD tray on both my DVR and Blu-Ray player open. When I press Menu on the remote, it brings up the menu on my DVR and my blu-ray player. This was just an annoyance at first until I realized that watching netflix or a bluray disc on the BD 370 could actually cause me to stop something from recording on my DVR due to the random command being sent to the DVR as I control the blu-ray player.3) Netflix only shows Instant QueueI admit, this is a very minor gripe, but I really got spoiled by the Netflix experience on my Xbox 360. On the xbox 360, the netflix menu shows not only the movies you have added to your instant queue, but also lets you browse a selection of shows/movies in other categories. I have found that I use that feature a lot. So I was pretty disappointed to see that it isn't replicated on the BD 370. However, the quality of the streaming on the BD 370 was every bit as good as on the Xbox 360. Also, I had zero problems connecting to netflix when I hooked up the player. I just connected the player to my router with an ethernet cable and it had no problem getting on netflix. Pro - The ability to watch Youtube on the BD 370 was cool, especially because it allowed me to log into my Youtube account and access my favorites. However, that was not enough to make me want to keep the player. All in all, if you don't mind the low volume level and you don't have any other LG DVD players or DVRs connected to the same TV as the BD 370, it is a pretty decent unit.

331e6974b022075b236705f1c85cc508

electronics

the desired focal length

question: How do you like the auto focus?, context: My first every Ebay score, the Canon EF-S 17-85mm lens (featuring image stabilization) was a much coveted item around here. It had come highly recommended and seemed to be a great complement to my beloved 50mm prime and a perfect replacement for the 18-55mm kit lens that shipped with the XTi.Initial, first-night impressions? Heavenly.Compared to the other lenses that I've put on the business end of the XTi, the 17-85mm is one heavy dude. I'd wager that it's at least as heavy as the camera and certainly feels as heavy as the 50mm and the 18-55mm put together. The lens is serious. It means business. It traveled back in time from the future to be here with us today. It's a touch of the photographic high-tech, made accessible to the amateur.With my right hand on the shutter and my left on the lens' barrel, it didn't feel any less heavy but "heavy", in my mind, became "solid". The auto-focus is nice and quiet and is reasonably fast to lock onto the subject. The focusing ring is also nice and big -- it cries out to be grasped and twisted. It was a joy to realize that even with the auto-focus turned on, the lens would not complain if I fine-tuned a given shot with some manual adjustments. (The AF doesn't totally commandeer the focus, that is to say.) The zoom is also smooth, the barrel moving quickly and easily without over-shooting the desired focal length.Image stabilization is also a big plus. I have a feeling that once I get the hang of it, it will save quite a few low-light, indoor, and hand-held shots over the lifetime of this lens. This isn't to be nave and believe it to be a cure-all. Certainly a few of my early test shots with the IS feature on prove that you can still wind up with a whole mess of blur. But others worked out pretty well.After having used it for about two weeks or so now, most of these initial impressions have stayed true. The IS feature is a good one but isn't something upon which to rely to save every shot. You still need to have good light and the right angle, etc.; but with the right ISO setting, it can save the scene. The heavy feeling of the lens is something I've gotten used to pretty quickly; after a couple of sessions, you just expect the camera to weight that much -- no worries. I've also found that the longer focal lengths are great for portraiture -- I find myself using focal lengths in the 70-85mm range pretty often now and I wonder how I ever lived without them before.That said, I'm beginning to wonder a little about the lens' chromatic aberration. I've had a few shots that don't seem to "resolve" the same way during post-processing (in Aperture) as similar shots under similar conditions with the same camera body and a different lens (e.g., the 50mm prime). This is not to say that I have my mind made up and am squaring the blame on the lens -- certainly not! But I am trying to parse my way through some of these, experimenting with some different conditions, etc. to see where it lands. I've just fallen into a certain rhythm with my post-processing and I would hate to have to learn a new dance just for the one, new lens.All things considered however, I've been very pleased with most of my results from the 17-85mm thus far....so yeah, worth it.But with respect to "worth it": Canon lists a retail price of $600 for the EF-S 17-85mm IS lens. Most places online seem to offer it in the $475-$550 range. As far as lenses go, this is hardly a costly one. Considering that this is one of the two lenses "given away" as the kit lens for Canon's 40D body, you wonder a little bit if the mass-production maybe watered it down just a little bit...? Just the same, this is a great "walk-around" lens: it is sturdy, has some great built-in features, and has a versatile range of focal lengths. If you got this lens "free" with your camera body then you are in luck. If you're looking to pick up one separately... Well, it's a great lens to have. And I'm happy with mine. But see if you can't score one on Ebay or through your local re-seller of high-quality, previously enjoyed lenses.Happy shooting, y'all.

How do you like the auto focus?

The zoom is also smooth, the barrel moving quickly and easily without over-shooting the desired focal length .Image stabilization is also a big plus.

My first every Ebay score, the Canon EF-S 17-85mm lens (featuring image stabilization) was a much coveted item around here. It had come highly recommended and seemed to be a great complement to my beloved 50mm prime and a perfect replacement for the 18-55mm kit lens that shipped with the XTi.Initial, first-night impressions? Heavenly.Compared to the other lenses that I've put on the business end of the XTi, the 17-85mm is one heavy dude. I'd wager that it's at least as heavy as the camera and certainly feels as heavy as the 50mm and the 18-55mm put together. The lens is serious. It means business. It traveled back in time from the future to be here with us today. It's a touch of the photographic high-tech, made accessible to the amateur.With my right hand on the shutter and my left on the lens' barrel, it didn't feel any less heavy but "heavy", in my mind, became "solid". The auto-focus is nice and quiet and is reasonably fast to lock onto the subject. The focusing ring is also nice and big -- it cries out to be grasped and twisted. It was a joy to realize that even with the auto-focus turned on, the lens would not complain if I fine-tuned a given shot with some manual adjustments. (The AF doesn't totally commandeer the focus, that is to say.) The zoom is also smooth, the barrel moving quickly and easily without over-shooting the desired focal length.Image stabilization is also a big plus. I have a feeling that once I get the hang of it, it will save quite a few low-light, indoor, and hand-held shots over the lifetime of this lens. This isn't to be nave and believe it to be a cure-all. Certainly a few of my early test shots with the IS feature on prove that you can still wind up with a whole mess of blur. But others worked out pretty well.After having used it for about two weeks or so now, most of these initial impressions have stayed true. The IS feature is a good one but isn't something upon which to rely to save every shot. You still need to have good light and the right angle, etc.; but with the right ISO setting, it can save the scene. The heavy feeling of the lens is something I've gotten used to pretty quickly; after a couple of sessions, you just expect the camera to weight that much -- no worries. I've also found that the longer focal lengths are great for portraiture -- I find myself using focal lengths in the 70-85mm range pretty often now and I wonder how I ever lived without them before.That said, I'm beginning to wonder a little about the lens' chromatic aberration. I've had a few shots that don't seem to "resolve" the same way during post-processing (in Aperture) as similar shots under similar conditions with the same camera body and a different lens (e.g., the 50mm prime). This is not to say that I have my mind made up and am squaring the blame on the lens -- certainly not! But I am trying to parse my way through some of these, experimenting with some different conditions, etc. to see where it lands. I've just fallen into a certain rhythm with my post-processing and I would hate to have to learn a new dance just for the one, new lens.All things considered however, I've been very pleased with most of my results from the 17-85mm thus far....so yeah, worth it.But with respect to "worth it": Canon lists a retail price of $600 for the EF-S 17-85mm IS lens. Most places online seem to offer it in the $475-$550 range. As far as lenses go, this is hardly a costly one. Considering that this is one of the two lenses "given away" as the kit lens for Canon's 40D body, you wonder a little bit if the mass-production maybe watered it down just a little bit...? Just the same, this is a great "walk-around" lens: it is sturdy, has some great built-in features, and has a versatile range of focal lengths. If you got this lens "free" with your camera body then you are in luck. If you're looking to pick up one separately... Well, it's a great lens to have. And I'm happy with mine. But see if you can't score one on Ebay or through your local re-seller of high-quality, previously enjoyed lenses.Happy shooting, y'all.

The zoom is also smooth, the barrel moving quickly and easily without over-shooting <hl> the desired focal length <hl> .Image stabilization is also a big plus.

My first every Ebay score, the Canon EF-S 17-85mm lens (featuring image stabilization) was a much coveted item around here. It had come highly recommended and seemed to be a great complement to my beloved 50mm prime and a perfect replacement for the 18-55mm kit lens that shipped with the XTi.Initial, first-night impressions? Heavenly.Compared to the other lenses that I've put on the business end of the XTi, the 17-85mm is one heavy dude. I'd wager that it's at least as heavy as the camera and certainly feels as heavy as the 50mm and the 18-55mm put together. The lens is serious. It means business. It traveled back in time from the future to be here with us today. It's a touch of the photographic high-tech, made accessible to the amateur.With my right hand on the shutter and my left on the lens' barrel, it didn't feel any less heavy but "heavy", in my mind, became "solid". The auto-focus is nice and quiet and is reasonably fast to lock onto the subject. The focusing ring is also nice and big -- it cries out to be grasped and twisted. It was a joy to realize that even with the auto-focus turned on, the lens would not complain if I fine-tuned a given shot with some manual adjustments. (The AF doesn't totally commandeer the focus, that is to say.) The zoom is also smooth, the barrel moving quickly and easily without over-shooting <hl> the desired focal length <hl>.Image stabilization is also a big plus. I have a feeling that once I get the hang of it, it will save quite a few low-light, indoor, and hand-held shots over the lifetime of this lens. This isn't to be nave and believe it to be a cure-all. Certainly a few of my early test shots with the IS feature on prove that you can still wind up with a whole mess of blur. But others worked out pretty well.After having used it for about two weeks or so now, most of these initial impressions have stayed true. The IS feature is a good one but isn't something upon which to rely to save every shot. You still need to have good light and the right angle, etc.; but with the right ISO setting, it can save the scene. The heavy feeling of the lens is something I've gotten used to pretty quickly; after a couple of sessions, you just expect the camera to weight that much -- no worries. I've also found that the longer focal lengths are great for portraiture -- I find myself using focal lengths in the 70-85mm range pretty often now and I wonder how I ever lived without them before.That said, I'm beginning to wonder a little about the lens' chromatic aberration. I've had a few shots that don't seem to "resolve" the same way during post-processing (in Aperture) as similar shots under similar conditions with the same camera body and a different lens (e.g., the 50mm prime). This is not to say that I have my mind made up and am squaring the blame on the lens -- certainly not! But I am trying to parse my way through some of these, experimenting with some different conditions, etc. to see where it lands. I've just fallen into a certain rhythm with my post-processing and I would hate to have to learn a new dance just for the one, new lens.All things considered however, I've been very pleased with most of my results from the 17-85mm thus far....so yeah, worth it.But with respect to "worth it": Canon lists a retail price of $600 for the EF-S 17-85mm IS lens. Most places online seem to offer it in the $475-$550 range. As far as lenses go, this is hardly a costly one. Considering that this is one of the two lenses "given away" as the kit lens for Canon's 40D body, you wonder a little bit if the mass-production maybe watered it down just a little bit...? Just the same, this is a great "walk-around" lens: it is sturdy, has some great built-in features, and has a versatile range of focal lengths. If you got this lens "free" with your camera body then you are in luck. If you're looking to pick up one separately... Well, it's a great lens to have. And I'm happy with mine. But see if you can't score one on Ebay or through your local re-seller of high-quality, previously enjoyed lenses.Happy shooting, y'all.

My first every Ebay score, the Canon EF-S 17-85mm lens (featuring image stabilization) was a much coveted item around here. It had come highly recommended and seemed to be a great complement to my beloved 50mm prime and a perfect replacement for the 18-55mm kit lens that shipped with the XTi. Initial, first-night impressions? Heavenly. Compared to the other lenses that I've put on the business end of the XTi, the 17-85mm is one heavy dude. I'd wager that it's at least as heavy as the camera and certainly feels as heavy as the 50mm and the 18-55mm put together. The lens is serious. It means business. It traveled back in time from the future to be here with us today. It's a touch of the photographic high-tech, made accessible to the amateur. With my right hand on the shutter and my left on the lens' barrel, it didn't feel any less heavy but "heavy", in my mind, became "solid". The auto-focus is nice and quiet and is reasonably fast to lock onto the subject. The focusing ring is also nice and big -- it cries out to be grasped and twisted. It was a joy to realize that even with the auto-focus turned on, the lens would not complain if I fine-tuned a given shot with some manual adjustments. (The AF doesn't totally commandeer the focus, that is to say.) <hl> The zoom is also smooth, the barrel moving quickly and easily without over-shooting the desired focal length .Image stabilization is also a big plus. <hl> I have a feeling that once I get the hang of it, it will save quite a few low-light, indoor, and hand-held shots over the lifetime of this lens. This isn't to be nave and believe it to be a cure-all. Certainly a few of my early test shots with the IS feature on prove that you can still wind up with a whole mess of blur. But others worked out pretty well. After having used it for about two weeks or so now, most of these initial impressions have stayed true. The IS feature is a good one but isn't something upon which to rely to save every shot. You still need to have good light and the right angle, etc.; but with the right ISO setting, it can save the scene. The heavy feeling of the lens is something I've gotten used to pretty quickly; after a couple of sessions, you just expect the camera to weight that much -- no worries. I've also found that the longer focal lengths are great for portraiture -- I find myself using focal lengths in the 70-85mm range pretty often now and I wonder how I ever lived without them before. That said, I'm beginning to wonder a little about the lens' chromatic aberration. I've had a few shots that don't seem to "resolve" the same way during post-processing (in Aperture) as similar shots under similar conditions with the same camera body and a different lens (e.g., the 50mm prime). This is not to say that I have my mind made up and am squaring the blame on the lens -- certainly not! But I am trying to parse my way through some of these, experimenting with some different conditions, etc. to see where it lands. I've just fallen into a certain rhythm with my post-processing and I would hate to have to learn a new dance just for the one, new lens. All things considered however, I've been very pleased with most of my results from the 17-85mm thus far.... so yeah, worth it. But with respect to "worth it": Canon lists a retail price of $600 for the EF-S 17-85mm IS lens. Most places online seem to offer it in the $475-$550 range. As far as lenses go, this is hardly a costly one. Considering that this is one of the two lenses "given away" as the kit lens for Canon's 40D body, you wonder a little bit if the mass-production maybe watered it down just a little bit...? Just the same, this is a great "walk-around" lens: it is sturdy, has some great built-in features, and has a versatile range of focal lengths. If you got this lens "free" with your camera body then you are in luck. If you're looking to pick up one separately... Well, it's a great lens to have. And I'm happy with mine. But see if you can't score one on Ebay or through your local re-seller of high-quality, previously enjoyed lenses. Happy shooting, y'all.

623bae52bf7f7be0ddeb1befc6bd0ccb

electronics

We have more expensive cables connecting

question: Is the cable expensive?, context: We bought these to connect our wireless blu-ray player to our 1080p Plasma TV - and they work perfect. We have more expensive cables connecting our other equipment ( recommended by sales people-of course ) we cannot tell the difference - Our next purchase of cables will be these again for sure!

Is the cable expensive?

We have more expensive cables connecting our other equipment ( recommended by sales people-of course ) we cannot tell the difference - Our next purchase of cables will be these again for sure!

We bought these to connect our wireless blu-ray player to our 1080p Plasma TV - and they work perfect. We have more expensive cables connecting our other equipment ( recommended by sales people-of course ) we cannot tell the difference - Our next purchase of cables will be these again for sure!

<hl> We have more expensive cables connecting <hl> our other equipment ( recommended by sales people-of course ) we cannot tell the difference - Our next purchase of cables will be these again for sure!

We bought these to connect our wireless blu-ray player to our 1080p Plasma TV - and they work perfect. <hl> We have more expensive cables connecting <hl> our other equipment ( recommended by sales people-of course ) we cannot tell the difference - Our next purchase of cables will be these again for sure!

We bought these to connect our wireless blu-ray player to our 1080p Plasma TV - and they work perfect. <hl> We have more expensive cables connecting our other equipment ( recommended by sales people-of course ) we cannot tell the difference - Our next purchase of cables will be these again for sure! <hl>

dce4485cc7c4570c7513031592e75fc0

electronics

The keyboard was not good for fast typing

question: How is the keyboard?, context: I've been using the product to type up my notes during class, and it is perfect!For my first few years, I had been carrying my macbook pro around for class.This was fine when I literally lived in the school. For the last two years, I had to move into an apartment with a 15 minute walk to the school building.Carrying a 15 inch laptop, though much smaller than the competition, was still quite heavy with all my books. I turned to the ipad to be both my computer and etextbook reader. The only problem I had was with using my ipad to type in class. The keyboard was not good for fast typing.However, with the IMP38B, I have the best of both worlds in a small package!The keys are a comfortable familiar size, needing no getting used to time.The case and keyboard also have a matte finish. While minute, it is perfect for oily finger days.The only thing I don't like, is if I touch the swivel mount, or bump the ipad/keyboard to hard, the swivel mount does move a bit, requiring some readjusting.For the price, this keybaord is PERFECT and WELL worth the money!

How is the keyboard?

The keyboard was not good for fast typing .However, with the IMP38B, I have the best of both worlds in a small package!The keys are a comfortable familiar size, needing no getting used to time.

I've been using the product to type up my notes during class, and it is perfect!For my first few years, I had been carrying my macbook pro around for class.This was fine when I literally lived in the school. For the last two years, I had to move into an apartment with a 15 minute walk to the school building.Carrying a 15 inch laptop, though much smaller than the competition, was still quite heavy with all my books. I turned to the ipad to be both my computer and etextbook reader. The only problem I had was with using my ipad to type in class. The keyboard was not good for fast typing.However, with the IMP38B, I have the best of both worlds in a small package!The keys are a comfortable familiar size, needing no getting used to time.The case and keyboard also have a matte finish. While minute, it is perfect for oily finger days.The only thing I don't like, is if I touch the swivel mount, or bump the ipad/keyboard to hard, the swivel mount does move a bit, requiring some readjusting.For the price, this keybaord is PERFECT and WELL worth the money!

<hl> The keyboard was not good for fast typing <hl> .However, with the IMP38B, I have the best of both worlds in a small package!The keys are a comfortable familiar size, needing no getting used to time.

I've been using the product to type up my notes during class, and it is perfect!For my first few years, I had been carrying my macbook pro around for class.This was fine when I literally lived in the school. For the last two years, I had to move into an apartment with a 15 minute walk to the school building.Carrying a 15 inch laptop, though much smaller than the competition, was still quite heavy with all my books. I turned to the ipad to be both my computer and etextbook reader. The only problem I had was with using my ipad to type in class. <hl> The keyboard was not good for fast typing <hl>.However, with the IMP38B, I have the best of both worlds in a small package!The keys are a comfortable familiar size, needing no getting used to time.The case and keyboard also have a matte finish. While minute, it is perfect for oily finger days.The only thing I don't like, is if I touch the swivel mount, or bump the ipad/keyboard to hard, the swivel mount does move a bit, requiring some readjusting.For the price, this keybaord is PERFECT and WELL worth the money!

I've been using the product to type up my notes during class, and it is perfect!For my first few years, I had been carrying my macbook pro around for class. This was fine when I literally lived in the school. For the last two years, I had to move into an apartment with a 15 minute walk to the school building. Carrying a 15 inch laptop, though much smaller than the competition, was still quite heavy with all my books. I turned to the ipad to be both my computer and etextbook reader. The only problem I had was with using my ipad to type in class. <hl> The keyboard was not good for fast typing .However, with the IMP38B, I have the best of both worlds in a small package!The keys are a comfortable familiar size, needing no getting used to time. <hl> The case and keyboard also have a matte finish. While minute, it is perfect for oily finger days. The only thing I don't like, is if I touch the swivel mount, or bump the ipad/keyboard to hard, the swivel mount does move a bit, requiring some readjusting. For the price, this keybaord is PERFECT and WELL worth the money!

5b1de83f51c76d6cc5e1f110380a27a6

electronics

Worth the money

question: How do you like the item?, context: Item received right on time, and delivery was Quick. Came with spare earbuds, which is always a plus. Odd shaped earpieces, but they fit suprisingly well, and sound better than the price would suggest. And I Love the "L" shaped haedphone jack, which seems more durable than the traditional straight-ilne jack. Worth the money, Thanks.

How do you like the item?

Worth the money , Thanks.

Item received right on time, and delivery was Quick. Came with spare earbuds, which is always a plus. Odd shaped earpieces, but they fit suprisingly well, and sound better than the price would suggest. And I Love the "L" shaped haedphone jack, which seems more durable than the traditional straight-ilne jack. Worth the money, Thanks.

<hl> Worth the money <hl> , Thanks.

Item received right on time, and delivery was Quick. Came with spare earbuds, which is always a plus. Odd shaped earpieces, but they fit suprisingly well, and sound better than the price would suggest. And I Love the "L" shaped haedphone jack, which seems more durable than the traditional straight-ilne jack. <hl> Worth the money <hl>, Thanks.

Item received right on time, and delivery was Quick. Came with spare earbuds, which is always a plus. Odd shaped earpieces, but they fit suprisingly well, and sound better than the price would suggest. And I Love the "L" shaped haedphone jack, which seems more durable than the traditional straight-ilne jack. <hl> Worth the money , Thanks. <hl>

9da54098a8fd741fdfdba454f7b45a24

electronics

The sound quality for a mono device isn't bad

question: Is the sound quality of the adapter proportional to the price?, context: Keeping in mind "you get what you pay for," I give this 4 out of 5 stars. The sound quality for a mono device isn't bad, but let's not compare this to high-end equipment. You can also daisy chain a second one (and possibly keep going?) for stereo -- however I just needed some sound from my VM platform, so this does just fine. The buttons are difficult to press -- I have to actually pick it up every time or I'll push it off the desk when I attempt to control the volume. I like that you can charge it (via USB) while it's in use. I'm not aware of how long the charge will last since this speaker will go nowhere. Directions could have been composed better, but this is a simple device to setup and use.

Is the sound quality of the adapter proportional to the price?

The sound quality for a mono device isn't bad , but let's not compare this to high-end equipment.

Keeping in mind "you get what you pay for," I give this 4 out of 5 stars. The sound quality for a mono device isn't bad, but let's not compare this to high-end equipment. You can also daisy chain a second one (and possibly keep going?) for stereo -- however I just needed some sound from my VM platform, so this does just fine. The buttons are difficult to press -- I have to actually pick it up every time or I'll push it off the desk when I attempt to control the volume. I like that you can charge it (via USB) while it's in use. I'm not aware of how long the charge will last since this speaker will go nowhere. Directions could have been composed better, but this is a simple device to setup and use.

<hl> The sound quality for a mono device isn't bad <hl> , but let's not compare this to high-end equipment.

Keeping in mind "you get what you pay for," I give this 4 out of 5 stars. <hl> The sound quality for a mono device isn't bad <hl>, but let's not compare this to high-end equipment. You can also daisy chain a second one (and possibly keep going?) for stereo -- however I just needed some sound from my VM platform, so this does just fine. The buttons are difficult to press -- I have to actually pick it up every time or I'll push it off the desk when I attempt to control the volume. I like that you can charge it (via USB) while it's in use. I'm not aware of how long the charge will last since this speaker will go nowhere. Directions could have been composed better, but this is a simple device to setup and use.

Keeping in mind "you get what you pay for," I give this 4 out of 5 stars. <hl> The sound quality for a mono device isn't bad , but let's not compare this to high-end equipment. <hl> You can also daisy chain a second one (and possibly keep going?) for stereo -- however I just needed some sound from my VM platform, so this does just fine. The buttons are difficult to press -- I have to actually pick it up every time or I'll push it off the desk when I attempt to control the volume. I like that you can charge it (via USB) while it's in use. I'm not aware of how long the charge will last since this speaker will go nowhere. Directions could have been composed better, but this is a simple device to setup and use.

ef82d265ff85d9f4cab2922e6749eea1

electronics

First pair I bought got stolen outta my car

question: How is the quality of the bass?, context: First pair I bought got stolen outta my car, somebody smashed my window and took my bag that held it :(Anyway, first pair sounded great.I bought another pair, there was an extremely disappointing crackle in one of the headphones from a low frequency. This made me extremely annoyed/angry/disappointed. I cannot stand bad crap, and I hate to give bad product reviews. But I had to send it back and now I will look for a different company brand, probably for the rest of my life.

How is the quality of the bass?

First pair I bought got stolen outta my car , somebody smashed my window and took my bag that held it :(Anyway, first pair sounded great.

First pair I bought got stolen outta my car, somebody smashed my window and took my bag that held it :(Anyway, first pair sounded great.I bought another pair, there was an extremely disappointing crackle in one of the headphones from a low frequency. This made me extremely annoyed/angry/disappointed. I cannot stand bad crap, and I hate to give bad product reviews. But I had to send it back and now I will look for a different company brand, probably for the rest of my life.

<hl> First pair I bought got stolen outta my car <hl> , somebody smashed my window and took my bag that held it :(Anyway, first pair sounded great.

<hl> First pair I bought got stolen outta my car <hl>, somebody smashed my window and took my bag that held it :(Anyway, first pair sounded great.I bought another pair, there was an extremely disappointing crackle in one of the headphones from a low frequency. This made me extremely annoyed/angry/disappointed. I cannot stand bad crap, and I hate to give bad product reviews. But I had to send it back and now I will look for a different company brand, probably for the rest of my life.

<hl> First pair I bought got stolen outta my car , somebody smashed my window and took my bag that held it :(Anyway, first pair sounded great. <hl> I bought another pair, there was an extremely disappointing crackle in one of the headphones from a low frequency. This made me extremely annoyed/angry/disappointed. I cannot stand bad crap, and I hate to give bad product reviews. But I had to send it back and now I will look for a different company brand, probably for the rest of my life.

456b1ca6c68d516da88d50f7b5451d39

electronics

The tablet is very good as far as internet speed

question: How fast did you set the tablet?, context: The tablet is very good as far as internet speed and opening apps goes...a hundred times better than the Coby tablet I had. The only thing that I am concerned about is that it hangs up on a couple of my favorite apps. One is doodle jump. It played it the first time I installed it then the next time it just quits functioning after a bit. The other is Fruit Ninja...it doesn't open all the time and I have to uninstall and reinstall to get it to work again. It's a really good tablet though.

How fast did you set the tablet?

The tablet is very good as far as internet speed and opening apps goes...a hundred times better than the Coby tablet I had.

The tablet is very good as far as internet speed and opening apps goes...a hundred times better than the Coby tablet I had. The only thing that I am concerned about is that it hangs up on a couple of my favorite apps. One is doodle jump. It played it the first time I installed it then the next time it just quits functioning after a bit. The other is Fruit Ninja...it doesn't open all the time and I have to uninstall and reinstall to get it to work again. It's a really good tablet though.

<hl> The tablet is very good as far as internet speed <hl> and opening apps goes...a hundred times better than the Coby tablet I had.

<hl> The tablet is very good as far as internet speed <hl> and opening apps goes...a hundred times better than the Coby tablet I had. The only thing that I am concerned about is that it hangs up on a couple of my favorite apps. One is doodle jump. It played it the first time I installed it then the next time it just quits functioning after a bit. The other is Fruit Ninja...it doesn't open all the time and I have to uninstall and reinstall to get it to work again. It's a really good tablet though.

<hl> The tablet is very good as far as internet speed and opening apps goes...a hundred times better than the Coby tablet I had. <hl> The only thing that I am concerned about is that it hangs up on a couple of my favorite apps. One is doodle jump. It played it the first time I installed it then the next time it just quits functioning after a bit. The other is Fruit Ninja...it doesn't open all the time and I have to uninstall and reinstall to get it to work again. It's a really good tablet though.

8ccce591cfc3955d11b3b12b298a38ca

electronics

people writing reviews for this mouse

question: Where is the weight of this place?, context: Most people writing reviews for this mouse have already raved about it- let me add my voice to the crowd. I use a laptop for work every day, and always like to have a mouse as I don't like the eraser-head or the touch-pad nearly as much as an external mouse. However, carrying a mouse around can be annoying.The Nano makes it less so- this mouse is ergonomically designed for true comfort. My hands are fairly small, but I have no trouble reaching the very conveniently-placed buttons to navigate forward or backward, up or down.My favorite feature is the one-click button that you can press which will take you straight to your favorite Internet search engine! This is a great feature when you have a lot of documents open already and don't want to minimize and go back to the desktop for your internet link!The mouse comes with a convenient carrying case, two AAA batteries, an optional desktop adapter and a CD for installation. It is easy to install and takes absolutely no effort or reading of the instruction manual to work. I am not at the forefront of the technological revolution by any means, but I enjoy comfort, simplicity and convenience in electronic accessories. This mouse meets those requirements and for that, I would highly recommend it to anyone who prefers using a mouse to an eraser-head or touch-pad.

Where is the weight of this place?

Most people writing reviews for this mouse have already raved about it- let me add my voice to the crowd.

Most people writing reviews for this mouse have already raved about it- let me add my voice to the crowd. I use a laptop for work every day, and always like to have a mouse as I don't like the eraser-head or the touch-pad nearly as much as an external mouse. However, carrying a mouse around can be annoying.The Nano makes it less so- this mouse is ergonomically designed for true comfort. My hands are fairly small, but I have no trouble reaching the very conveniently-placed buttons to navigate forward or backward, up or down.My favorite feature is the one-click button that you can press which will take you straight to your favorite Internet search engine! This is a great feature when you have a lot of documents open already and don't want to minimize and go back to the desktop for your internet link!The mouse comes with a convenient carrying case, two AAA batteries, an optional desktop adapter and a CD for installation. It is easy to install and takes absolutely no effort or reading of the instruction manual to work. I am not at the forefront of the technological revolution by any means, but I enjoy comfort, simplicity and convenience in electronic accessories. This mouse meets those requirements and for that, I would highly recommend it to anyone who prefers using a mouse to an eraser-head or touch-pad.

Most <hl> people writing reviews for this mouse <hl> have already raved about it- let me add my voice to the crowd.

Most <hl> people writing reviews for this mouse <hl> have already raved about it- let me add my voice to the crowd. I use a laptop for work every day, and always like to have a mouse as I don't like the eraser-head or the touch-pad nearly as much as an external mouse. However, carrying a mouse around can be annoying.The Nano makes it less so- this mouse is ergonomically designed for true comfort. My hands are fairly small, but I have no trouble reaching the very conveniently-placed buttons to navigate forward or backward, up or down.My favorite feature is the one-click button that you can press which will take you straight to your favorite Internet search engine! This is a great feature when you have a lot of documents open already and don't want to minimize and go back to the desktop for your internet link!The mouse comes with a convenient carrying case, two AAA batteries, an optional desktop adapter and a CD for installation. It is easy to install and takes absolutely no effort or reading of the instruction manual to work. I am not at the forefront of the technological revolution by any means, but I enjoy comfort, simplicity and convenience in electronic accessories. This mouse meets those requirements and for that, I would highly recommend it to anyone who prefers using a mouse to an eraser-head or touch-pad.

<hl> Most people writing reviews for this mouse have already raved about it- let me add my voice to the crowd. <hl> I use a laptop for work every day, and always like to have a mouse as I don't like the eraser-head or the touch-pad nearly as much as an external mouse. However, carrying a mouse around can be annoying. The Nano makes it less so- this mouse is ergonomically designed for true comfort. My hands are fairly small, but I have no trouble reaching the very conveniently-placed buttons to navigate forward or backward, up or down. My favorite feature is the one-click button that you can press which will take you straight to your favorite Internet search engine! This is a great feature when you have a lot of documents open already and don't want to minimize and go back to the desktop for your internet link!The mouse comes with a convenient carrying case, two AAA batteries, an optional desktop adapter and a CD for installation. It is easy to install and takes absolutely no effort or reading of the instruction manual to work. I am not at the forefront of the technological revolution by any means, but I enjoy comfort, simplicity and convenience in electronic accessories. This mouse meets those requirements and for that, I would highly recommend it to anyone who prefers using a mouse to an eraser-head or touch-pad.

635fbb4e0fd835b51a8735de67c772b8

electronics

This grip fits perfect, feels good in your hands

question: What do you think about grip?, context: I use this with my Nikon D7000 and an off label battery. This grip fits perfect, feels good in your hands, is exactly compatible with my camera, and looks just like the Nikon grip. The wheel that you use to tighten works fine, but you can jiggle it back and forth. This does not affect how it fits at all. It doesn't mean that the grip is coming loose, its just how it is. It comes with an optional insert for AA batteries if you don't happen to have a second lithium battery charged. I also like how it has the shutter button, AE-L/FE-L button, and front and rear dials as well as directional buttons to control the menus while the camera is vertical.I honestly did not know if it would be a fully compatible grip for that price but I was pleasantly surprised. I definitely recommend this to anyone looking for a quality yet inexpensive grip. It really gives your camera a professional look.

What do you think about grip?

This grip fits perfect, feels good in your hands , is exactly compatible with my camera, and looks just like the Nikon grip.

I use this with my Nikon D7000 and an off label battery. This grip fits perfect, feels good in your hands, is exactly compatible with my camera, and looks just like the Nikon grip. The wheel that you use to tighten works fine, but you can jiggle it back and forth. This does not affect how it fits at all. It doesn't mean that the grip is coming loose, its just how it is. It comes with an optional insert for AA batteries if you don't happen to have a second lithium battery charged. I also like how it has the shutter button, AE-L/FE-L button, and front and rear dials as well as directional buttons to control the menus while the camera is vertical.I honestly did not know if it would be a fully compatible grip for that price but I was pleasantly surprised. I definitely recommend this to anyone looking for a quality yet inexpensive grip. It really gives your camera a professional look.

<hl> This grip fits perfect, feels good in your hands <hl> , is exactly compatible with my camera, and looks just like the Nikon grip.

I use this with my Nikon D7000 and an off label battery. <hl> This grip fits perfect, feels good in your hands <hl>, is exactly compatible with my camera, and looks just like the Nikon grip. The wheel that you use to tighten works fine, but you can jiggle it back and forth. This does not affect how it fits at all. It doesn't mean that the grip is coming loose, its just how it is. It comes with an optional insert for AA batteries if you don't happen to have a second lithium battery charged. I also like how it has the shutter button, AE-L/FE-L button, and front and rear dials as well as directional buttons to control the menus while the camera is vertical.I honestly did not know if it would be a fully compatible grip for that price but I was pleasantly surprised. I definitely recommend this to anyone looking for a quality yet inexpensive grip. It really gives your camera a professional look.

I use this with my Nikon D7000 and an off label battery. <hl> This grip fits perfect, feels good in your hands , is exactly compatible with my camera, and looks just like the Nikon grip. <hl> The wheel that you use to tighten works fine, but you can jiggle it back and forth. This does not affect how it fits at all. It doesn't mean that the grip is coming loose, its just how it is. It comes with an optional insert for AA batteries if you don't happen to have a second lithium battery charged. I also like how it has the shutter button, AE-L/FE-L button, and front and rear dials as well as directional buttons to control the menus while the camera is vertical. I honestly did not know if it would be a fully compatible grip for that price but I was pleasantly surprised. I definitely recommend this to anyone looking for a quality yet inexpensive grip. It really gives your camera a professional look.

7ed3d1c0395d62c695e1101620822089

electronics

Sony AVR

question: Where do I have a drawer full of headphones?, context: I use this remote with our Vizio TV, Sony AVR, and Sony BD. The remote has great functionality, lots of buttons, and is capable of learning from other remotes. With this one remote we control everything we have.On a side note, it works much better than the Vizio remote that came with the TV. We never have to fiddle around pointing it just right like you have to do with the Vizio remote. This one just works all the time.

Where do I have a drawer full of headphones?

I use this remote with our Vizio TV, Sony AVR , and Sony BD.

I use this remote with our Vizio TV, Sony AVR, and Sony BD. The remote has great functionality, lots of buttons, and is capable of learning from other remotes. With this one remote we control everything we have.On a side note, it works much better than the Vizio remote that came with the TV. We never have to fiddle around pointing it just right like you have to do with the Vizio remote. This one just works all the time.

I use this remote with our Vizio TV, <hl> Sony AVR <hl> , and Sony BD.

I use this remote with our Vizio TV, <hl> Sony AVR <hl>, and Sony BD. The remote has great functionality, lots of buttons, and is capable of learning from other remotes. With this one remote we control everything we have.On a side note, it works much better than the Vizio remote that came with the TV. We never have to fiddle around pointing it just right like you have to do with the Vizio remote. This one just works all the time.

<hl> I use this remote with our Vizio TV, Sony AVR , and Sony BD. <hl> The remote has great functionality, lots of buttons, and is capable of learning from other remotes. With this one remote we control everything we have. On a side note, it works much better than the Vizio remote that came with the TV. We never have to fiddle around pointing it just right like you have to do with the Vizio remote. This one just works all the time.

fea27b3fa4a4ef0a154e362fbbedabf2

electronics

The shape of the mouse is comfortable

question: How is the shape?, context: I have had it. This mouse is terrible. I've got a cheap bundled no-name mouse on my laptop, and I'm stealing it and throwing this one away. Even that mouse is better than this one.The biggest problem with this mouse is the tendency to double click when a button has been clicked once. It started two months after I got the mouse. At first it was now and then, making me think I'd clicked twice. Six months later, it's a constant thing, probably about 80% of the time.The tracking is also not great. With a mouse pad it's bearable, without one it's impossible. Either way, sometimes small movements just don't happen at all. I'm never really sure where the pointer will be when I move the mouse.The three year battery life was good for about 6 months. To me that's not a big deal. I've usually got batteries on hand because we go through them quickly in remotes, so if that was the only problem with this mouse it would hardly be worth mentioning.The shape of the mouse is comfortable, and the scroll wheel is fantastic. But the mouse really does have to work properly before those things become important.For the primary computers I've owned nothing but Logitech mice and mostly Logitech keyboards since the day I gave up my IBM tactile click keyboard. This mouse has been so frustrating that it has convinced me to give up on Logitech for good.

How is the shape?

The shape of the mouse is comfortable , and the scroll wheel is fantastic.

I have had it. This mouse is terrible. I've got a cheap bundled no-name mouse on my laptop, and I'm stealing it and throwing this one away. Even that mouse is better than this one.The biggest problem with this mouse is the tendency to double click when a button has been clicked once. It started two months after I got the mouse. At first it was now and then, making me think I'd clicked twice. Six months later, it's a constant thing, probably about 80% of the time.The tracking is also not great. With a mouse pad it's bearable, without one it's impossible. Either way, sometimes small movements just don't happen at all. I'm never really sure where the pointer will be when I move the mouse.The three year battery life was good for about 6 months. To me that's not a big deal. I've usually got batteries on hand because we go through them quickly in remotes, so if that was the only problem with this mouse it would hardly be worth mentioning.The shape of the mouse is comfortable, and the scroll wheel is fantastic. But the mouse really does have to work properly before those things become important.For the primary computers I've owned nothing but Logitech mice and mostly Logitech keyboards since the day I gave up my IBM tactile click keyboard. This mouse has been so frustrating that it has convinced me to give up on Logitech for good.

<hl> The shape of the mouse is comfortable <hl> , and the scroll wheel is fantastic.

I have had it. This mouse is terrible. I've got a cheap bundled no-name mouse on my laptop, and I'm stealing it and throwing this one away. Even that mouse is better than this one.The biggest problem with this mouse is the tendency to double click when a button has been clicked once. It started two months after I got the mouse. At first it was now and then, making me think I'd clicked twice. Six months later, it's a constant thing, probably about 80% of the time.The tracking is also not great. With a mouse pad it's bearable, without one it's impossible. Either way, sometimes small movements just don't happen at all. I'm never really sure where the pointer will be when I move the mouse.The three year battery life was good for about 6 months. To me that's not a big deal. I've usually got batteries on hand because we go through them quickly in remotes, so if that was the only problem with this mouse it would hardly be worth mentioning.<hl> The shape of the mouse is comfortable <hl>, and the scroll wheel is fantastic. But the mouse really does have to work properly before those things become important.For the primary computers I've owned nothing but Logitech mice and mostly Logitech keyboards since the day I gave up my IBM tactile click keyboard. This mouse has been so frustrating that it has convinced me to give up on Logitech for good.

I have had it. This mouse is terrible. I've got a cheap bundled no-name mouse on my laptop, and I'm stealing it and throwing this one away. Even that mouse is better than this one. The biggest problem with this mouse is the tendency to double click when a button has been clicked once. It started two months after I got the mouse. At first it was now and then, making me think I'd clicked twice. Six months later, it's a constant thing, probably about 80% of the time. The tracking is also not great. With a mouse pad it's bearable, without one it's impossible. Either way, sometimes small movements just don't happen at all. I'm never really sure where the pointer will be when I move the mouse. The three year battery life was good for about 6 months. To me that's not a big deal. I've usually got batteries on hand because we go through them quickly in remotes, so if that was the only problem with this mouse it would hardly be worth mentioning. <hl> The shape of the mouse is comfortable , and the scroll wheel is fantastic. <hl> But the mouse really does have to work properly before those things become important. For the primary computers I've owned nothing but Logitech mice and mostly Logitech keyboards since the day I gave up my IBM tactile click keyboard. This mouse has been so frustrating that it has convinced me to give up on Logitech for good.

e030ab3f7895ed491757ee93b6ed00ce

electronics

It was easy to put up, The instructions were clear and the Television was a snap to hang.

question: How is the unit?, context: It was easy to put up, The instructions were clear and the Television was a snap to hang. Job done.

How is the unit?

It was easy to put up, The instructions were clear and the Television was a snap to hang. Job done.

It was easy to put up, The instructions were clear and the Television was a snap to hang. Job done.

<hl> It was easy to put up, The instructions were clear and the Television was a snap to hang. <hl> Job done.

<hl> It was easy to put up, The instructions were clear and the Television was a snap to hang. <hl> Job done.

<hl> It was easy to put up, The instructions were clear and the Television was a snap to hang. Job done. <hl>

9ce99fc336843c1503a3ec788de3b5eb

electronics

about 20 minutes later, it shuts off inexplicably and tries to tell me that the battery is empty

question: How is the battery?, context: I struggled giving this a 3 star review, because the low price should be a factor int he score. But is the MP3 player decent or not? The price really shouldn't matter or decide whether it's good or bad. And the truth it, it's both.For one, the Rhapsody software it want you to use is junk. Get rid of it because it doesn't do what it's supposed to and it's clunky, crappy, outdated software. The way to sync media with this device is with Windows Media Player. It works best and is the program that makes the most sense.Now to the device. For one, the buttons are spotty on mine. Occasionally, the pause button just decides to not work, so I essentially have to shut the thing off at that point. Which isn't a big deal if you're just listening to songs. But if you listen to audiobooks or radio shows you've recorded or podcasts, it doesn't ALWAYS save your location on the file. It usually does, but again, it's spotty and occasionally the device just decides to not save where it was in the file.Another major problem I've had is the battery life. I'll turn on my device to see it with 50% power. Then, about 20 minutes later, it shuts off inexplicably and tries to tell me that the battery is empty. Great.Now this thing is light and I like that. It clips very comfortably on to your clothes and the clip is sturdy. So that's one in the plus column. It's inexpensive but at no point using this device have I forgotten that. It feels cheap through and through. And really... it's not all THAT cheap.Otherwise, it does what it's supposed to do. It plays music files. You can create custom playlists in WMP or whichever syncing software you choose and it's cool. Navigating through menus is pretty straight forward. The sound is decent.Everything about this MP3 player is average at best. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing. If you're looking for a solid MP3 player that's light and relatively inexpensive, I personally think you'll be fien here. It's great for working out and things like that. I paid nearly $60 for mine and for that price, it does it's job. Nothing more though. It doesn't impress me or leave me blown away. It just does what I paid it to do.

How is the battery?

Then, about 20 minutes later, it shuts off inexplicably and tries to tell me that the battery is empty .

I struggled giving this a 3 star review, because the low price should be a factor int he score. But is the MP3 player decent or not? The price really shouldn't matter or decide whether it's good or bad. And the truth it, it's both.For one, the Rhapsody software it want you to use is junk. Get rid of it because it doesn't do what it's supposed to and it's clunky, crappy, outdated software. The way to sync media with this device is with Windows Media Player. It works best and is the program that makes the most sense.Now to the device. For one, the buttons are spotty on mine. Occasionally, the pause button just decides to not work, so I essentially have to shut the thing off at that point. Which isn't a big deal if you're just listening to songs. But if you listen to audiobooks or radio shows you've recorded or podcasts, it doesn't ALWAYS save your location on the file. It usually does, but again, it's spotty and occasionally the device just decides to not save where it was in the file.Another major problem I've had is the battery life. I'll turn on my device to see it with 50% power. Then, about 20 minutes later, it shuts off inexplicably and tries to tell me that the battery is empty. Great.Now this thing is light and I like that. It clips very comfortably on to your clothes and the clip is sturdy. So that's one in the plus column. It's inexpensive but at no point using this device have I forgotten that. It feels cheap through and through. And really... it's not all THAT cheap.Otherwise, it does what it's supposed to do. It plays music files. You can create custom playlists in WMP or whichever syncing software you choose and it's cool. Navigating through menus is pretty straight forward. The sound is decent.Everything about this MP3 player is average at best. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing. If you're looking for a solid MP3 player that's light and relatively inexpensive, I personally think you'll be fien here. It's great for working out and things like that. I paid nearly $60 for mine and for that price, it does it's job. Nothing more though. It doesn't impress me or leave me blown away. It just does what I paid it to do.

Then, <hl> about 20 minutes later, it shuts off inexplicably and tries to tell me that the battery is empty <hl> .

I struggled giving this a 3 star review, because the low price should be a factor int he score. But is the MP3 player decent or not? The price really shouldn't matter or decide whether it's good or bad. And the truth it, it's both.For one, the Rhapsody software it want you to use is junk. Get rid of it because it doesn't do what it's supposed to and it's clunky, crappy, outdated software. The way to sync media with this device is with Windows Media Player. It works best and is the program that makes the most sense.Now to the device. For one, the buttons are spotty on mine. Occasionally, the pause button just decides to not work, so I essentially have to shut the thing off at that point. Which isn't a big deal if you're just listening to songs. But if you listen to audiobooks or radio shows you've recorded or podcasts, it doesn't ALWAYS save your location on the file. It usually does, but again, it's spotty and occasionally the device just decides to not save where it was in the file.Another major problem I've had is the battery life. I'll turn on my device to see it with 50% power. Then, <hl> about 20 minutes later, it shuts off inexplicably and tries to tell me that the battery is empty <hl>. Great.Now this thing is light and I like that. It clips very comfortably on to your clothes and the clip is sturdy. So that's one in the plus column. It's inexpensive but at no point using this device have I forgotten that. It feels cheap through and through. And really... it's not all THAT cheap.Otherwise, it does what it's supposed to do. It plays music files. You can create custom playlists in WMP or whichever syncing software you choose and it's cool. Navigating through menus is pretty straight forward. The sound is decent.Everything about this MP3 player is average at best. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing. If you're looking for a solid MP3 player that's light and relatively inexpensive, I personally think you'll be fien here. It's great for working out and things like that. I paid nearly $60 for mine and for that price, it does it's job. Nothing more though. It doesn't impress me or leave me blown away. It just does what I paid it to do.

I struggled giving this a 3 star review, because the low price should be a factor int he score. But is the MP3 player decent or not? The price really shouldn't matter or decide whether it's good or bad. And the truth it, it's both. For one, the Rhapsody software it want you to use is junk. Get rid of it because it doesn't do what it's supposed to and it's clunky, crappy, outdated software. The way to sync media with this device is with Windows Media Player. It works best and is the program that makes the most sense. Now to the device. For one, the buttons are spotty on mine. Occasionally, the pause button just decides to not work, so I essentially have to shut the thing off at that point. Which isn't a big deal if you're just listening to songs. But if you listen to audiobooks or radio shows you've recorded or podcasts, it doesn't ALWAYS save your location on the file. It usually does, but again, it's spotty and occasionally the device just decides to not save where it was in the file. Another major problem I've had is the battery life. I'll turn on my device to see it with 50% power. <hl> Then, about 20 minutes later, it shuts off inexplicably and tries to tell me that the battery is empty . <hl> Great. Now this thing is light and I like that. It clips very comfortably on to your clothes and the clip is sturdy. So that's one in the plus column. It's inexpensive but at no point using this device have I forgotten that. It feels cheap through and through. And really... it's not all THAT cheap. Otherwise, it does what it's supposed to do. It plays music files. You can create custom playlists in WMP or whichever syncing software you choose and it's cool. Navigating through menus is pretty straight forward. The sound is decent. Everything about this MP3 player is average at best. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing. If you're looking for a solid MP3 player that's light and relatively inexpensive, I personally think you'll be fien here. It's great for working out and things like that. I paid nearly $60 for mine and for that price, it does it's job. Nothing more though. It doesn't impress me or leave me blown away. It just does what I paid it to do.

fb7fe4aedde08b0228bf30b73bef955c

electronics

This keyboard forces you to relearn typing

question: How do you like the keyboard?, context: As with most Microsoft products, great hardware, poor software, but oh well.Now I'm using this thing right now, and I never noticed the spacebar thing, but it's true, if you don't press the spacebar correctly and press it on the upper area, it's hard to press down. I've always pressed spacebars as they were meant to be pressed so I had no issues adjusting.The largest challenge with this keyboard is using home row correctly, Microsoft puts out products based on the standard, and has done this with its' Natural line since the start. I use my left hand correctly, my right, on my Logitech Elite, went all over the place; I can only imagine how wrong my right hand usage was. This keyboard forces you to relearn typing, for typing classes, a Natural keyboard would be perfect, it makes you type correctly. I don't much like the N key, but I've learned to use it and the M key correctly, no more hitting my enter key while going for quotes either.The zoom function is novelty, not necessity, it's fun to use normally but mostly useless otherwise, really exclusively for the always-in-office user, what they need to do is make it a scroll button too, it's highly sensitive and easy to use, which would make scrolling silky smooth in a way only overpriced mice manage.Therein lies the problem, the software is inferior to my cheapie Logitech Elite(Which had more functions I might add as well as better software.), there is hardly any customization to be had. There is no taskbar icon; most of the remapping done is through an interface integrated into the already well-hidden Keyboard area under the control panel. Remapping options are less than fantastic, the favorites keys are useless, the back and forward buttons will work with either a browser or a media player, not both, zoom cannot be reconfigured, and Mail only allows one indicated program to be opened.This is what is wrong with the favorite's keys, they allow but five programs to be opened, you cannot indicate that you wish to open a menu of programs to select, merely one program per key, same with all of the other keys. The lack of "My" keys for the F# Buttons is annoying, but that's just a design decision for a non-media keyboard, and I don't mind much.This keyboard would've done better to have more configuration and just a couple more media keys, but I suppose it's my fault for asking that much of it, it's designed for the office, not a music listeners hands. I'll go into the aesthetics of this baby now to round it off.Some may notice the shift keys are smaller, and the enter key even smaller, the right of the keyboard is larger than the left in the way of keys, which seems fine, to me at least, I find reaching the Backspace key uncomfortable, placing your hands on this keyboard is like a match made in heaven, seems a shame to reach so far away and break off from paradise.That leads me to this palm rest, wow, sick of those cheap detachable plastic palm rests(Read: Wrist Destroyers)? This is your ticket, so soft, yet strong, it's the cashmere of palm wrests. The 2x3 layout is back to normal, which I very much enjoy, insert is back home and delete is too. The keys above the numpad offer more functions that I have yet to use, but are nice to have all the same, the curvature of the keys takes getting used to, particularly the aforementioned N key and it's sibling the M key. The Alt, Ctrl, Windows, Menu, and Start keys are all gigantic and hard to miss, they feel pretty great.The spacebar, apparently if struck correctly, is amazing, it's designed for this keyboard in a way that no spacebar has ever been, it's almost destructive of what you're typing looking down while you type, seeing it all functioning the way it does, it's almost like some kind of alien technology, which is why I don't look.The...crappy plastic attachment that comes attached(Oddly enough) to this masterpiece is best taken out(Easily) and forgotten, it's all personal preference of course, I didn't like it, the slope of the keys makes leaving your hands where they are painless and then very comfortable. The prop-ups on the back make it more conventional and I rather like them, but now the size.This keyboard is undeniably the largest keyboard I have ever laid eyes on, the sheer width and height is enough to make a laptop user gawk for moments at a time, it is critical you have a large amount of desk space to place this on, I didn't, and I had to move my entire PC over more to the left just to manage a nice cozy fit. When the legs on this baby are propped it also reaches monitor height, I.E., it will not fit very well under a monitor, which is why it is best used in a keyboard tray, though I'd worry about it's large scale hurting the tray after a long enough time.In conclusion, this is a masterful piece of hardware, and it has virtually no flaws, the software is pathetic at best and obviously designed for the dullard worker drone, it's a pity really, all the same, it deserves four stars, here's to hoping they manage to improve the boring, bland software.8/10 (Not an average)

How do you like the keyboard?

This keyboard forces you to relearn typing , for typing classes, a Natural keyboard would be perfect, it makes you type correctly.

As with most Microsoft products, great hardware, poor software, but oh well.Now I'm using this thing right now, and I never noticed the spacebar thing, but it's true, if you don't press the spacebar correctly and press it on the upper area, it's hard to press down. I've always pressed spacebars as they were meant to be pressed so I had no issues adjusting.The largest challenge with this keyboard is using home row correctly, Microsoft puts out products based on the standard, and has done this with its' Natural line since the start. I use my left hand correctly, my right, on my Logitech Elite, went all over the place; I can only imagine how wrong my right hand usage was. This keyboard forces you to relearn typing, for typing classes, a Natural keyboard would be perfect, it makes you type correctly. I don't much like the N key, but I've learned to use it and the M key correctly, no more hitting my enter key while going for quotes either.The zoom function is novelty, not necessity, it's fun to use normally but mostly useless otherwise, really exclusively for the always-in-office user, what they need to do is make it a scroll button too, it's highly sensitive and easy to use, which would make scrolling silky smooth in a way only overpriced mice manage.Therein lies the problem, the software is inferior to my cheapie Logitech Elite(Which had more functions I might add as well as better software.), there is hardly any customization to be had. There is no taskbar icon; most of the remapping done is through an interface integrated into the already well-hidden Keyboard area under the control panel. Remapping options are less than fantastic, the favorites keys are useless, the back and forward buttons will work with either a browser or a media player, not both, zoom cannot be reconfigured, and Mail only allows one indicated program to be opened.This is what is wrong with the favorite's keys, they allow but five programs to be opened, you cannot indicate that you wish to open a menu of programs to select, merely one program per key, same with all of the other keys. The lack of "My" keys for the F# Buttons is annoying, but that's just a design decision for a non-media keyboard, and I don't mind much.This keyboard would've done better to have more configuration and just a couple more media keys, but I suppose it's my fault for asking that much of it, it's designed for the office, not a music listeners hands. I'll go into the aesthetics of this baby now to round it off.Some may notice the shift keys are smaller, and the enter key even smaller, the right of the keyboard is larger than the left in the way of keys, which seems fine, to me at least, I find reaching the Backspace key uncomfortable, placing your hands on this keyboard is like a match made in heaven, seems a shame to reach so far away and break off from paradise.That leads me to this palm rest, wow, sick of those cheap detachable plastic palm rests(Read: Wrist Destroyers)? This is your ticket, so soft, yet strong, it's the cashmere of palm wrests. The 2x3 layout is back to normal, which I very much enjoy, insert is back home and delete is too. The keys above the numpad offer more functions that I have yet to use, but are nice to have all the same, the curvature of the keys takes getting used to, particularly the aforementioned N key and it's sibling the M key. The Alt, Ctrl, Windows, Menu, and Start keys are all gigantic and hard to miss, they feel pretty great.The spacebar, apparently if struck correctly, is amazing, it's designed for this keyboard in a way that no spacebar has ever been, it's almost destructive of what you're typing looking down while you type, seeing it all functioning the way it does, it's almost like some kind of alien technology, which is why I don't look.The...crappy plastic attachment that comes attached(Oddly enough) to this masterpiece is best taken out(Easily) and forgotten, it's all personal preference of course, I didn't like it, the slope of the keys makes leaving your hands where they are painless and then very comfortable. The prop-ups on the back make it more conventional and I rather like them, but now the size.This keyboard is undeniably the largest keyboard I have ever laid eyes on, the sheer width and height is enough to make a laptop user gawk for moments at a time, it is critical you have a large amount of desk space to place this on, I didn't, and I had to move my entire PC over more to the left just to manage a nice cozy fit. When the legs on this baby are propped it also reaches monitor height, I.E., it will not fit very well under a monitor, which is why it is best used in a keyboard tray, though I'd worry about it's large scale hurting the tray after a long enough time.In conclusion, this is a masterful piece of hardware, and it has virtually no flaws, the software is pathetic at best and obviously designed for the dullard worker drone, it's a pity really, all the same, it deserves four stars, here's to hoping they manage to improve the boring, bland software.8/10 (Not an average)

<hl> This keyboard forces you to relearn typing <hl> , for typing classes, a Natural keyboard would be perfect, it makes you type correctly.

As with most Microsoft products, great hardware, poor software, but oh well.Now I'm using this thing right now, and I never noticed the spacebar thing, but it's true, if you don't press the spacebar correctly and press it on the upper area, it's hard to press down. I've always pressed spacebars as they were meant to be pressed so I had no issues adjusting.The largest challenge with this keyboard is using home row correctly, Microsoft puts out products based on the standard, and has done this with its' Natural line since the start. I use my left hand correctly, my right, on my Logitech Elite, went all over the place; I can only imagine how wrong my right hand usage was. <hl> This keyboard forces you to relearn typing <hl>, for typing classes, a Natural keyboard would be perfect, it makes you type correctly. I don't much like the N key, but I've learned to use it and the M key correctly, no more hitting my enter key while going for quotes either.The zoom function is novelty, not necessity, it's fun to use normally but mostly useless otherwise, really exclusively for the always-in-office user, what they need to do is make it a scroll button too, it's highly sensitive and easy to use, which would make scrolling silky smooth in a way only overpriced mice manage.Therein lies the problem, the software is inferior to my cheapie Logitech Elite(Which had more functions I might add as well as better software.), there is hardly any customization to be had. There is no taskbar icon; most of the remapping done is through an interface integrated into the already well-hidden Keyboard area under the control panel. Remapping options are less than fantastic, the favorites keys are useless, the back and forward buttons will work with either a browser or a media player, not both, zoom cannot be reconfigured, and Mail only allows one indicated program to be opened.This is what is wrong with the favorite's keys, they allow but five programs to be opened, you cannot indicate that you wish to open a menu of programs to select, merely one program per key, same with all of the other keys. The lack of "My" keys for the F# Buttons is annoying, but that's just a design decision for a non-media keyboard, and I don't mind much.This keyboard would've done better to have more configuration and just a couple more media keys, but I suppose it's my fault for asking that much of it, it's designed for the office, not a music listeners hands. I'll go into the aesthetics of this baby now to round it off.Some may notice the shift keys are smaller, and the enter key even smaller, the right of the keyboard is larger than the left in the way of keys, which seems fine, to me at least, I find reaching the Backspace key uncomfortable, placing your hands on this keyboard is like a match made in heaven, seems a shame to reach so far away and break off from paradise.That leads me to this palm rest, wow, sick of those cheap detachable plastic palm rests(Read: Wrist Destroyers)? This is your ticket, so soft, yet strong, it's the cashmere of palm wrests. The 2x3 layout is back to normal, which I very much enjoy, insert is back home and delete is too. The keys above the numpad offer more functions that I have yet to use, but are nice to have all the same, the curvature of the keys takes getting used to, particularly the aforementioned N key and it's sibling the M key. The Alt, Ctrl, Windows, Menu, and Start keys are all gigantic and hard to miss, they feel pretty great.The spacebar, apparently if struck correctly, is amazing, it's designed for this keyboard in a way that no spacebar has ever been, it's almost destructive of what you're typing looking down while you type, seeing it all functioning the way it does, it's almost like some kind of alien technology, which is why I don't look.The...crappy plastic attachment that comes attached(Oddly enough) to this masterpiece is best taken out(Easily) and forgotten, it's all personal preference of course, I didn't like it, the slope of the keys makes leaving your hands where they are painless and then very comfortable. The prop-ups on the back make it more conventional and I rather like them, but now the size.This keyboard is undeniably the largest keyboard I have ever laid eyes on, the sheer width and height is enough to make a laptop user gawk for moments at a time, it is critical you have a large amount of desk space to place this on, I didn't, and I had to move my entire PC over more to the left just to manage a nice cozy fit. When the legs on this baby are propped it also reaches monitor height, I.E., it will not fit very well under a monitor, which is why it is best used in a keyboard tray, though I'd worry about it's large scale hurting the tray after a long enough time.In conclusion, this is a masterful piece of hardware, and it has virtually no flaws, the software is pathetic at best and obviously designed for the dullard worker drone, it's a pity really, all the same, it deserves four stars, here's to hoping they manage to improve the boring, bland software.8/10 (Not an average)

As with most Microsoft products, great hardware, poor software, but oh well. Now I'm using this thing right now, and I never noticed the spacebar thing, but it's true, if you don't press the spacebar correctly and press it on the upper area, it's hard to press down. I've always pressed spacebars as they were meant to be pressed so I had no issues adjusting. The largest challenge with this keyboard is using home row correctly, Microsoft puts out products based on the standard, and has done this with its' Natural line since the start. I use my left hand correctly, my right, on my Logitech Elite, went all over the place; I can only imagine how wrong my right hand usage was. <hl> This keyboard forces you to relearn typing , for typing classes, a Natural keyboard would be perfect, it makes you type correctly. <hl> I don't much like the N key, but I've learned to use it and the M key correctly, no more hitting my enter key while going for quotes either. The zoom function is novelty, not necessity, it's fun to use normally but mostly useless otherwise, really exclusively for the always-in-office user, what they need to do is make it a scroll button too, it's highly sensitive and easy to use, which would make scrolling silky smooth in a way only overpriced mice manage. Therein lies the problem, the software is inferior to my cheapie Logitech Elite(Which had more functions I might add as well as better software.), there is hardly any customization to be had. There is no taskbar icon; most of the remapping done is through an interface integrated into the already well-hidden Keyboard area under the control panel. Remapping options are less than fantastic, the favorites keys are useless, the back and forward buttons will work with either a browser or a media player, not both, zoom cannot be reconfigured, and Mail only allows one indicated program to be opened. This is what is wrong with the favorite's keys, they allow but five programs to be opened, you cannot indicate that you wish to open a menu of programs to select, merely one program per key, same with all of the other keys. The lack of "My" keys for the F# Buttons is annoying, but that's just a design decision for a non-media keyboard, and I don't mind much. This keyboard would've done better to have more configuration and just a couple more media keys, but I suppose it's my fault for asking that much of it, it's designed for the office, not a music listeners hands. I'll go into the aesthetics of this baby now to round it off. Some may notice the shift keys are smaller, and the enter key even smaller, the right of the keyboard is larger than the left in the way of keys, which seems fine, to me at least, I find reaching the Backspace key uncomfortable, placing your hands on this keyboard is like a match made in heaven, seems a shame to reach so far away and break off from paradise. That leads me to this palm rest, wow, sick of those cheap detachable plastic palm rests(Read: Wrist Destroyers)? This is your ticket, so soft, yet strong, it's the cashmere of palm wrests. The 2x3 layout is back to normal, which I very much enjoy, insert is back home and delete is too. The keys above the numpad offer more functions that I have yet to use, but are nice to have all the same, the curvature of the keys takes getting used to, particularly the aforementioned N key and it's sibling the M key. The Alt, Ctrl, Windows, Menu, and Start keys are all gigantic and hard to miss, they feel pretty great. The spacebar, apparently if struck correctly, is amazing, it's designed for this keyboard in a way that no spacebar has ever been, it's almost destructive of what you're typing looking down while you type, seeing it all functioning the way it does, it's almost like some kind of alien technology, which is why I don't look. The...crappy plastic attachment that comes attached(Oddly enough) to this masterpiece is best taken out(Easily) and forgotten, it's all personal preference of course, I didn't like it, the slope of the keys makes leaving your hands where they are painless and then very comfortable. The prop-ups on the back make it more conventional and I rather like them, but now the size. This keyboard is undeniably the largest keyboard I have ever laid eyes on, the sheer width and height is enough to make a laptop user gawk for moments at a time, it is critical you have a large amount of desk space to place this on, I didn't, and I had to move my entire PC over more to the left just to manage a nice cozy fit. When the legs on this baby are propped it also reaches monitor height, I.E., it will not fit very well under a monitor, which is why it is best used in a keyboard tray, though I'd worry about it's large scale hurting the tray after a long enough time. In conclusion, this is a masterful piece of hardware, and it has virtually no flaws, the software is pathetic at best and obviously designed for the dullard worker drone, it's a pity really, all the same, it deserves four stars, here's to hoping they manage to improve the boring, bland software.8/10 (Not an average)

4bf0ff1fe81d8fd223942dd24512b42a

electronics