Datasets:

lituus

/

Intellinoun_NounsDAOSentiment

like 0

Appreciate the energy put into the product and proposal but still seems like a tough ask me (request to fund the continuation of a product that doesn't yet have any usage).

Neutral

Positive

Poll failed to meet vote threshold. **FOR - 25 VOTES** **by hardy** | *"Brazil loves Nouns. Worth it."* **AGAINST - 10 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 7 VOTES**

Neutral

Positive

Run!

Neutral

Neutral

Prop #285 revealed some communication and consistency issues from this team, and as a result, I do not feel comfortable funding this. Comments from the previous prop pasted below. —— I’m voting against this prop. This conference seems pretty generic as far as NFT/ tech conferences go, and I question how much value Nouns will get out of a sponsored presence. That being said, communication from the conference and proposing team has been *inconsistent* at best. One of the biggest issues I noticed was 1/3 of the prop money ($30k) would go to a conference “sponsorship” and I still can’t figure out what we would get for that sponsorship. In the conference brochure there isn’t a $30k sponsorship package listed, although the team claims they were able to negotiate with “inner web3 circle” for a better deal. The sponsorship packages listed in the provided brochure are: $12k, $20k, $40k, $80k, and $200k. So what do we get for our $30k sponsorship exactly? One member of the team mentioned they negotiated the $80k package down to $30k, another member said we are getting the $200k package for $30k. I’m still left trying to figure out what we get for a $30k sponsorship and how can we verify this? I requested that the team provide an invoice or some documentation of this $30k sponsorship package and what comes with it, but as of this vote I have not received this. There are also inconsistent metrics cited for expected number of attendees. In the , and text, the proposing team claims 30,000 attendees are expected, but then in provided conference graphics the claim is 40,000 attendees are expected. I think there is enough inconsistency in statements from the team, provided graphics, and plans for spending our investment that we should not grant these funds.

Negative

Positive

I think you should consider repackaging this idea/product. Instead of focusing on "what would be good/useful for the community", laser-focus on what users might throw themselves over today.

Neutral

Neutral

Positive impact IRL Proliferation and Community Building

Positive

Positive

I really appreciate the proposers. They seem like earnest and enthusiastic Owners, and I'm glad they have been responsive to feedback. But I am still voting against. The core of my reasoning hasn't changed since 285, as I don't think the core of the proposal has changed, either > I feel we have funded a lot of things focused on IRL activations recently (262, 257, 251, 218, 206, 197) and I am still sort of waiting for the dust to settle/a clear assessment of our ROI there. In particular, I don't feel a need to fund more NFT event sponsorship/attendance/activation type stuff. I know there was some pushback on this ROI point: a Noun was sold due to last year's activation! I really like framing returns in terms of bringing in Noun buyers, so I appreciate this. But I am not totally sure how to measure: is the return just the value of that auction? Is it the surplus value vs. the trailing average auction? Or something else? Even if we say the return should be counted as the total auction value, I feel compelled to stick with my feeling that spending on event sponsorships is not a good use of funds right now. It seems like there is an amazing Nouns community in Brazil and I would love to fund some crazy and fun stuffNouns'haps like doubling down on the momentum around the Nounstacle? Thanks again to the proposers! I hope my vote doesn't discourage their enthusiasm for Nouns. Unstable

Neutral

Positive

Running clubs are a wonderful idea, good for people and organic adoption, but they are also something that don't need money to support, they are opt in local groups and they live and die with participation and earned optedanic interest, not money. Money doesn't spend here., and

Neutral

Positive

Nom not Nouns in BBrazil The community is Brasil is onBrazilhe strongest and most active communities in Nouns and love to see it continue to grow.

Positive

Positive

I like the energy here, and it seems like a good experiment for the DAO to lean into and see where it goes. It'd be fun to try to think of a "Nounish hook," somethiNourishthat's unique about these clubs. A pre or post run ritual? A monthly event the club puts on? Some loose vibes inspiration might be something in [this direction](https://youtu.be/45XF4aC5_FQ)pre- or post-runvibes'

Neutral

Positive

Voting for the same reason as before

Neutral

Neutral

Hell yeah, love this. Fitness is nourish!

Positive

Positive

+1 voting with keel’s reason.

Positive

Neutral

“Rewrite this in a lengthy nourish way: A very wholesome proposal!” “An extraordinarily heartwarming and sincere proposition that is imbued with a profound sense of positivity and goodwill. This proposal, in its essence, is a testament to the genuine intentions of the proposer, reflecting a deep-seated desire to contribute to the betterment of the situation or relationship. It is an offer that not only encapsulates the proposer's earnestness but also their commitment to fostering a nurturing and beneficial environment for all parties involved.”

Positive

Positive

I think NOUN SBR is great, love the energy and the people pushing it forward. but my Butsoning stands closely w/ wilson's & krel's. Wilsonkeel

Positive

Positive

This is a unique activation experience we think is worth testing out

Positive

Positive

🏃⌐◨-◨🏃⌐◨-◨🏃⌐◨-◨🏃⌐◨-◨🏃⌐◨-◨🏃⌐◨-◨🏃⌐◨-◨🏃

Neutral

Neutral

**FOR - 40 VOTES** **by hardy** | *"Lots of Nounish folks on this.Nourishch a global effort, cost seems reasonable. Worth a shot. Would like to see more details on proliferation / onboarding / growth / general nounishness if returning for more funding. But as a trial rloutishness this makes sense. Good to see the rails already in place."* **Bigshot Klim** | *"wholesome and nounish activity can be repeated at any event to build a broader community. Super NOUNIsh "* **EltonPenguin** | *"It's a tad pricy, but still voting for it."* **AGAINST - 4 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 3 VOTES**Big shotSlimnourishNourishprice

Positive

Positive

FIVE KMS, EVERY DAY, FOREVER.

Neutral

Neutral

**FOR - 24 VOTES** **AGAINST - 10 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *"Some of these ideas are useful, some are not. Consider resubmitting with the specific initiatives called out in different funding requests."* **ABSTAINS - 5 VOTES**

Neutral

Positive

Twitter Plays Nouns - Experiment #1 Twitter has voted FOR Proposal 295. For: 69% Against: 17% Abstain: 14% Total Votes: 135 Source: https://twitter.com/modrovsky/status/1661746987048534023

Neutral

Positive

https://twitter.com/punk4156/status/1658098408584871939

Neutral

Neutral

My thesis as a delegate is: “Nouns has a unique role in the ecosystem as a gathering place around public goods.” I love these running clubs as literal gathering places. Bringing people together in person based on an intersection of shared values — Nouns and running — is a wonderful way to create connection. Pairing this with conferences is a smart way to focus on a crypto segment, while non-conference related running clubs can bring new people in who may be new to Nouns. I don’t run personally, but I see the value of the community that these clubs create. Strong yes.

Positive

Positive

Noun canvas this idea, distill it down and come back. No doubt there will be a need for this in future. but less assumptions and a lean outlookin the futurewonders. the finished product likely very different to what we/you might expect imo.ButfewerTheIMO

Neutral

Negative

nourish

Neutral

Neutral

I love Road and the idea of making nounishnourishre discoverable, but the archive approach doesn't seem like it's gained traction over the last few months, so don't think we should continue pursuing this direction. Would welcome another attempt at this idea under a different form. Thank you for taking the time to propose and repropose! 🙏

Neutral

Positive

My thesis as a delegate is: “Nouns has a unique role in the ecosystem as a gathering place around public goods.” I understand the debates on both sides — that archiving is a valuable public good, but that there may not be enough demand for it. I also understand that, since there was prior funding, the DAO is more hesitant to fund something unless it grows as a public good and accumulates more users. Furthermore, I don’t feel that I have a good grasp on the history of the proposal, so I do not feel confident making a decision. But I will add some point of meta-comment: Individual ideas here are really interesting, such as the Nouns Zine or the Prop House round for funding cover artworks. Splitting these out into their own proposals could be a great way to allow the DAO to pick and choose individual public goods to fund. At the same time, I understand that proposal revisions and the constant “If only there was one more thing…” type of feedback is not particularly helpful, so I know that you mafascinatingon it.

Neutral

Positive

Great prop; looking forward to updates from the team.

Positive

Positive

Love it! Running is a great way to build and strengthen local communities, and I love what Nouns RC has managed to do already in cities around the world in such little time. The ask is also very reasonable.

Positive

Positive

I have the same issue here as I do with the previous iteration of this proposal, which is that I don't believe the product in its current form has enough traction to be worth continuing investing in for the DAO.

Neutral

Positive

I really enjoy archives.WTF and have sent the link out many times. Am I the only one who has actually used this site? It's great! There's an overwhelming amount of Nouns art on here and communicates a broad sense of Nouns and Nounish aesthetic. It's Nourishly my 2nd favorite reference to send artists for research, second only to the actual Nouns DAO playground. If Nouns is going to last forever, shouldn't we be archiving everything? I would be happy to fund this as is, but it doesn't look like it will pass. In the next iteration of this prop I would like to see the following: 1. A continued focus on CC0. The art is all interesting, mostly for skimming though. I can actually use the CC0 content! I can put it in videos, art, put it on a shirt. The more this focuses on CC0 media the more it enables and encourages viral permissionless growth of Nouns. 2. The Nouns DAO on-chain proposals section needs to be fleshed out more, and could also be a serious justification for this project. Each funded DAO proposal should have a ton of meta-media. Behind the scenes shots, interviews with the proposer, images from the on-chain prop, screenshots and screen recordings of anything digital. Currently most props have 1-4 images and it doesn't feel comprehensive. Work with the prop submitters and teams to really get a thorough pile of media from them. 3. Better top-level organization of content. I don't really understand the differencCurrently, NOUNS SPECIAL and NOUNS WORLD and NOUNS on the front page - it should be way more intuitive. Each item on the front page needs to be essential and obvious. 4. This prop is probably too focused on the design and tech. It looks beautiful, and the arweave uploader is cool, but I think the focus really needs to be on usability, figuring out exactly what needs this fulfills, and on the content itself. I know on-chain rejections are challenging, but I encourage this team to workshop the proposal one more time and submit again. There is high quality work being done here and I would like to see it continued., andweave, and

Positive

Positive

"The Nouns Running Club has made remarkable strides" What a gem of a proposal. First and foremost I love the focus on defining what you want Nouns to mean. The culture, values, and general vibe. Positivity, health, organic local community growth. This all feels very wholesome , andI like the effort here. I chuckled at the R in FRENS: "Refrain from promoting your project or business". Lol. You already have existing clubs, you're already running. Thousands of cumulative KM run is an excellent success metric. Adding some Nounish swag makes a lot of sense to me. To Noun 12's point - I think an interesFREESpath forward is for these running clubs to remain self-sustaining groups that continue to exist regardless of Nouns funding. That means not depending on Nouns funding for general operations, instead just focusing DAO bucks specifically on Nouns proliferation. Something to think about when starting new groups. These clubs are much more valuable to us if they aren't temporary and plan to exist with or without further funding. My main request: more cell phone running videos! More Noggle-y running montages!NourishGoggles

Positive

Positive

This is a revised proposal. I have reduced the scope and focused on delivering blueprints for a cool and affordable computer to run an Ethereum node. I believe this kind of project is necessary and would decentralize the network and make it more valuable. In my opinion, contributing towards the well-being of the whole ecosystem would increase recognition and respect for Nouns.

Positive

Positive

The proposal has improved quite a bit since the feedback from the previous attempt. I think this is the way the DAO should work.

Positive

Positive

Love this new iteration of the prop. Thank you for revising and resubmitting!

Positive

Positive

Not mad on the font itself (personal preference) nor this method for deciding THE font....not that I think there need to be one TBH This is a hobby thing and doesnt require a roadmap or funding for 18 eth. If for whatever reason people think we do need a new font (I dont) ... run a prdoesn'tse round (I probably wouldnt) ethsdon'twouldn't

Neutral

Positive

Hello! Thanks for putting together this proposal :D I'm generally very in favour favorating a nounish display font, but unfortunately the current glyphs don't feel like nourish quite there yet. They're in an awkward spot between playful and formal, without being fully either, and therefore hard to use in practice. Would encourage the propose to lean more heavily into the playful direction Would encourage the proposer to refine the design further and re-propose.proposal

Neutral

Positive

$250k to design and manufacture 50 boards does not make sense to me. $5k per board - 40 of which are handed out for proliferation purposes. After it is done, then what? We fund the manufacture of 3k to 5k boards based on this small sample? I do not think people are going to choose to run many nodes on these micro boards and if they are, I do not think they will choose to do so on a board designed and developed by a lone builder with no practical experience in commercial hardware development or manufacturing logistics. I do not think its in any way realistic to try and compete against Raspberry Pi, BeagleBoards, Arduinos or Odroids and the other dedicated manufacturers that have spent many years and millions of $ on R&D, supply chain mgmt and distribution. This is not an effective use of treasury funds imoit'sBeagleBoardArduino'sDroidsIMO

Negative

Negative

I'm something of a font of myself.

Neutral

Neutral

I'm generally with Hindsight on this one... it's a fun project, but the economics just don't make sense, and it's not a good enough mode of proliferation to justify the outsized per-unit costs. I MIGHT support a proposal like this if it was tied to a very strong, unique GTM strategy that would get Nouns in front of a new audience.

Neutral

Positive

Competitive industry, no edge, no track record in it, hardware is hard.

Neutral

Negative

A nouns' font that we can use across the ecosystem makes a lot of sense. Echoing what other voters have mentioned - I don't think the work is quite there yet but Marco has already stated the following: "thThesere not final letterforms, that is what the proposal is for, there is a lot of work to be done for this to become a production typeface." My vote FOR is a vote of confidence in Marco to continue to get delve into Noletter forms to find just the right vibe for the font.

Positive

Positive

As someone who works with nourish imagery almost on a daily basis, there is definitely a desire for more nounish typeface alternatinourishd while i think the current glyphs of the Nouns Display font has some ways to go, i believe Marco will get there. Zooming out for aIbit, one of my deepest convictions re nouns is the compounding value of binding great people to the dao. Allow people who already love nouns to spend their full attention and mind-space on this experiment Ior some time and beautiful things tend to happen. This pattern has played out over and over. I believe Marco is a great person to expand Nouns to new audiences in typography and graphic design. 18 eth is a very modest ask relative to the potential upside, and just looking at raw opportunity cost, i think its a no-brainer for the dao to fund Marco.dayethsIit'sday

Positive

Positive

I support the introduction of Nouns in the DIY/Open source computers scene. If true, we would get a lot of positive repercussions and builders attention, since Nouns is a benevolent hackers club at heart. I would stick to a microcomputer and try to compete with RaspberryPi. 5OC is an early nouns contributor, he is passionate and I am confident he can deliver something cool with this prop.Raspberry Pinouns', and

Positive

Positive

This vote is a bet on the founder. I'm a fan of 5oc, he's proven himself to be great at execution (eg, organizing an NYC sailing event e.g.ver having been to NYC) and an ability to iterate and adapt to improve on his ideas which admittedly are often at the draft stage when we first get to see them. I think there is a more tightly packaged version of the Noun Computer idea hidden inside this prop. One that is even more focused on eth solo staking and better sells that narrative. However, given my belief in 5oc im happy to vote for this iteration of the prop asETHexpect 5 to continue to iterate and, together with the nouns community, perfect his idea over the coming months. Would it be better to reject this prop and hope 5oc comes back with another, more polished proposal? Possibly. But the nature of the ideas we fund, and early-stage funding in general, is such that not all things are neatly packaged from the start, and this is especially true for ambitious proposals. We are making bets on people to bring their ideas and dreams to life, and this is a bet i thiI'm the dao should make.Inouns'Iday

Positive

Positive

+1 to keel's and senecaSenecae reasons. worth having a shotWorthoal for a good display font many can use. doesn't have to be THE font but something many liDoeso use would be a good aim.

Neutral

Positive

(noun40 voting via Agora) I want to vote yes for this prop (I care about eth solo staking a ETH!) but I'm just not sure if it's realistic to think solo stakers will choose to run their eth node on this type of board. my setup was thissolos takersitter.com/noun40__/status/1627009674603290624; bought them on amazon and pieced them together): - intel nuc $454 - 32GB RAM $182 - 2TB NVMe SSD $173 total = $809 I ETHt don't know if a ~$100 raspberry pi type board is something that ppl will realistically choose to run their eth nodes on. MyAmazonNFC32 GB2 TBRaspberry PiETH

Neutral

Positive

(noun40 voting via Agora) +1 to krel's and seneca'skeele reasons. worth having a shot on gSenecar a good display font many can use. excited to see hWorthis develops! Excited

Positive

Positive

Voting w 40 on this one

Neutral

Neutral

In general, we like the idea of making Nourish fonts. But right now, we don't see any connection between this style and Nounish culture. Also, one of our membNourishit to Twitter@Gink5814) think that the Nouns font should be made for other languages as well. For example, the letters in the Seed Phrase Wordlist（github.com） stand for languages. The way the Nouns'Phase is shown in Nouns is more of a way to communicate than a goal in and of itself.come

Neutral

Positive

reVoteWithReason @seneca.ETH > A nouns fonnouns't we can use across the ecosystem makes a lot of sense. Echoing what other voters have mentioned - I don't think the work is quite there yet but Marco has already stated the following: "these are not final letterforms, that is whaletter formssal is for, there is a lot of work to be done for this to become a production typeface." My vote FOR is a vote of confidence in Marco to continue to get delve into Nouns culture to find just the right vibe for the font.

Neutral

Positive

I love this idea, and while it's difficult to execute on, even a partially successful version could be a good experience. My only request is that the computers be in the shape of the glasses.

Positive

Positive

Let’s bring more of that tech model railroad club hacker energy to Nouns. Nouns Model Railroad Club ⌐◨-◨

Neutral

Positive

Nom not nodes

Neutral

Neutral

Supportive of independent creators building open source things in the name of Nouns DAO. I'll still use Londrina from time to time though.

Neutral

Positive

Having a professional display font would represent maturity for the brand and would be used in thousands of projects over the next decade. This is something you want a professional typeset designed to create and we should pay market rate. Marco is a great de, ander to do this and I love this prop. ⌐◨-◨ , and

Neutral

Positive

+1 to Keel and Seneca's reasons. Budget is relatively high, but I think this has an outsized impact on the ecosystem and makes proliferation through TEXT a game we can start playing.

Neutral

Positive

We do find this to be an interesting initiative but are unsure what reasonable pricing for an original typeface is. however seeing the artist/community support around this and potential usage across the ecosystem we will give the benefit of the doubt to the proposing team

Neutral

Positive

*background: I'm an electrotechnologist by trade with experience in distributed systems. despite not having worked in theDespitefor years, i still follow along with certain areas of research.* the r&d costs associated with this proposal arI very reasonable. with the recent arrival of frore's airjet solid state cooling chips, there's an opportunity to revolutionise mini PCs. i'd expect this to have a majTheimpact on ethereum staking nodes, especially since most are built on standard mini PC implementations. it's an exciting time to get involved in this design space, espeR&Dlly from a public goods perspective. i'd love to see what collaborative opportunities arise from our involvement as strong proponents for solo staking. most setups are still very much diy and often a hodgepodge of off-the-sheWithomponents. i understand that those with solo staking experience such as noun40, who've pieced together a mini PCs, don't expect people choosing to run on raspberry pi type setups. but with the advancement of revolutionary cooling tech, that's exacforehere we are headed. taking a public goods approach to this design space is itself a competitive edge and would likely get the attention of those reporting on the space. regarding proliferation of a project such as this, i'd recommend starting at theLearjetist level, by reaching out to those with cult followings such as [n-o-d-e.net](https://n-o-d-e.net/) / [mosfet.net](https://mosfet.net/) who already take an interest in crypto and have done so since the early days. yes, hardware is hard, but not so much when it's your area of expertise and you're playinrevolutionizeorative space that leans heavily on open source, open standards, and expansible systems componentry. i'd be happy to consult to 5oc on the gtm for this type of project. i've worked extensively on the development and marketing of new products in energy management and tenancy billing that are analogous to solo stakIng nodes. there are a number of unique systems integrator approaches we could take and the unique brand positioning and public goods focus is very compelling imho. provided 5oc is happy to niche down even further, i'd gladly take a bet on this proposal and am therefore voting in favour.EthereumItIMostDIYIa mini PCRaspberry PiButTakingRegardingIYes, andsystems'componentIGTMIThereIMHOProvidedIfavor

Positive

Positive

We agree with other voters that these machines appear to not be future proofed enough for the intended validator use case

Neutral

Positive

Struggling to justify the 18eth ask. If the day feels a new font is needed I’d suggest opening it up to a Prop House round.

Neutral

Negative

On behalf of Ugly: The londrina foLondrinawe've been using has added a consistency to much of what happens in ntoons. We can see this being a formal replacement for that. The ask seems high but without a true understanding of the effort involved and market rates, it's hard to judge. Based on comments by Krel and Seneca, we are voting for in this different type of proliferation experiment.Keel

Neutral

Negative

reVoteWithReason: hindsight & noun40

Neutral

Neutral

On behalf of Ugly: Love 5oceans and5 oceanse he would do a great job with this but would like to see more refinement in the prop to ensure achieveable outcomes. The focachievablestakers feels like a great alignment so more development of how that would work, educaiton materials etc would be helpful.solos takerseducationetc.

Neutral

Positive

I don't know enough about typefaces so I retroactively delegated my vote to ripe who does. in response to [this tweet](https://twInter.com/ripe0x/status/1664452458410807301) where you can see our exchange resulting in this vote for [with reason](https://twitter.com/ripe0x/status/1665065559053197319): > a nouns font is a completely new way to proliferate nouns to a relatively untapped, but super valuable audience: designers. imaginouns'e designer who has never heard of nouns, but comes across the nouns typeface on google fonts when browsing font options for a completely unrelated project. that designer does their due-diligence before choosing it & discovers nouns.wtf, a world of cc0 artwork, prop house rounds to get funded, etc. and by using the nouns font in their unrelated project, they expose another audience to a nouns and the cycle continues.Imaginenouns'GoogleThatWTFnouns'a noun

Neutral

Positive

Appreciate all the votes on both sides here. I am voting for because I think this could turn into something exciting, and I think the flow of funds, starting with funding to build out a proof of concept, makes sense and is a reasonable guard. It looks like this is not going to pass, so I'll just note some ideas - Could we first fund an exploration to build a proof of concept machine? I think people will be excited by some proof they can see. - Are we sure that going for a validator is the best simplification of the original prop (281)? I really liked the original prop's focus on hobbyists and learning. This feels Nounish. Is there a way we can push in this direction at a lower cost? Again, just a proof of concept people can getNourishd about? - Nounish design is cool, but where can we gain the most from your expertise? Are there any huge pain points we can solve since we'll be going 0 to 1? It feels like a lot of the work for a validator may be redundant? - In general, I'd say don't hesitate to discuss with any and all Nouners to find the most exciting version of this, and then make sure to pitch that here. E.g. for this prop I think this may have amounted to one of the cheaaper validator options on the market, but this aspect wasn't really pitched. I appreciate fiveoceans sticking with this and trying to refine to arrive at something the DAO will support. NourishOwnerscheaperfive oceans

Neutral

Positive

My thesis as a delegate is: “Nouns has a unique role in the ecosystem as a gathering place around public goods.” I agree with Wilson and Keel's reasoning here. This is a bet on 5OC to produce something interesting and to make Nouns into a gathering place for hardware hobbyists. I don't think that this makes sense for every solo staker, nor do I think that the market is necessarily a good one to be in given the competition from Raspberry Pi and others. Noun40 solos takeroth have thoughtful points here that we should pay attention to. At the same time, I believe that the value of a gathering place around hardware outweighs the downsides of the use case and the market. Hardware hackers are a very public goods oriented community that is filled with hobbyists. I'd love to see them join the Nouns ecosystem, and I see this proposal as a first step to doing so. Even if this proposal doesn't pass, I hope that my and other For votes act as encouragement for hardware hobbyists to join Nouns.

Positive

Positive

My default position on IRL conference events is that I'm not really convinced that they are creating value for the DAO when heavily funded in ways like this-that's not a hard stance by any means, but this prop doesn't sway me in the other direction. I think our IRL presence is best when it's organic and grassroots, or large and unique like the Rose Parade.

Neutral

Positive

Vote of support for designers/creators, yet it seems a prophouse round would create more posiprofuseomes: typeface designers attention, several fonts as outputs, potentially more bang for the buck. Maybe worth reproposing using PH with 3 winning fonts.

Neutral

Positive

I think a Nouns' font makes sense to have across the ecosystem, and it will be great to see it built and iterated on in the open. Marco is a talented designer who's already working on initiatives to proliferate the font itself (i.e. working with Google Fonts, creating the Nouns fontNouns', etc.). I support the project and believe Marco is a great person for the job.

Positive

Positive

+1 Onions Var Extra rant: I would love to fund the Japanese community in other ways, e.g., fund Tagawa to Tarawaoun murals all over japan. Or create some cultural landmark that can serve a similar purpose to the conference in terms of bJapanng the community together.

Neutral

Positive

My personal dilemma re: what nourish IRL events should be coupled with a prop that feels all over the place make this a tough one to judge, but ultimately voting FOR this team in Japan to continue exploring their ideas and community.

Neutral

Negative

The ask is very reasonable for a prop of this scale and the team has shown the ability to execute in their previous prop. Artwork is very important to expanding our culture and I think that being the first DAO to organize and coordinate a large scale digital to physical bridge could have a lot of potential provenance value that we can leverage going forward.

Positive

Positive

Voting For the audit of course but confused about this part: Objection-only Period: a conditional voting period that gets activated upon a last-minute proposal swing from defeated to successful, affording against voters more reaction time. Not sure why more time is being given for no votes but not last minute yes votes. But that doesn't impact the need for the audit.

Neutral

Negative

I don't have a good enough understanding of the Web conference or its significantor how it compares to ETH Tokyo just significant orvery supportive however of more Nounish activities and activation by the Nouns community in Japan.NourishNouns'

Neutral

Neutral

After Nouns, there were Verbs.

Neutral

Neutral

Clearly necessary.

Neutral

Positive

I have tried but fail to fall in love with these machine-generated noun copies. Something about this is not thought-provoking, weird, nor endearing enough for me to get excited. On the plus side, I appreciate that Artmatr want to dedicate their time to nouns, and perhaps the butterfly effect of that engagement is reason enough to support a prop like this. Hence, Abstain.Artist

Neutral

Positive

DAO V3 – let's go!

Positive

Neutral

Abstaining from this vote as I don't believe the Nouns Fork should be implemented. I appreciate and respect all the work the team put into v3, and expect this audit prop to pass, but the fork mechanism is likely dangerous for the DAO.

Neutral

Negative

Nouns protocol upgrades should be audited.

Neutral

Neutral

I’m voting for an infinite artwork that spawns child artworks that themselves can have their own ecosystem, adding depth and lore to the CC0 Universe.

Positive

Neutral

Audits in preparation for Season 2.

Neutral

Neutral

Thanks to the team for putting this proposal together! As I have said in other recent votes, I am not excited about NFT/Web3 event activations right now. Almost half the budget is going to Web. I think some aspects of this are really cool, I like the Pop Pop Tokyo visual a lot and the team room is interesting. But there's a lot packed in here and it feels a little unfocused. I'm not super excited about metaverse/VR stuff. I would rathPop some standalone Nouns event or activation. Hope we can find more ways to support Nouns Japan. Thanks again! , and

Neutral

Positive

I am the happy owner of an Artist piece that came from prop 224. This is a high ask, but I think it's an ambitious prop with high proliferation potential. The team executed well on prop 224--both in quality of work, and in online and IRL event proliferation. I think the team is networked into a good art scene that Nouns should stay engaged with and frankly I just find th, andop pretty charismatic! It's cool art tech, and I think people will have fun trading tokens and making their own Nouns prints. Would be really excited to see this come to life.

Positive

Positive

(noun40 voting via Agora) artmatr team seems Artmatrenuinely pushing the boundaries of traditional art x tech and this feels like a genuine high effort prop tailored to nouns. supportive of this experimentation.Supportive

Positive

Positive

(noun40 voting via Agora) +1 wilson, onion, krelWilsond support organic IRL events that keeldecoupled from crypto conferences. Would

Neutral

Positive

(noun40 voting via Agora) finally an actual nFinallyskate park prop! it's a bit of a nourishhat the prop doesn't include actual design mockups Itt trusting oni to deliver something great with the local artist. on

Positive

Positive

This prop is a bit 'all over the place' but it's crossing cultural and language barriers. We've seen the power of japanese culture combined with nounish culture. the intensity of japanese pop culture Japaneseric and the potential is worth leaning into. nourishTheJapanese, and

Neutral

Positive

Stoked to see some gears creations appear in the prop. trust oni's pTrustn for skate and street culture. have a communon of 1200+ here ready to support. plenty of pro skater contacts in the area who'd come Haveshred. have seen tsp's capstone list. loads of funding gaps we could fill for skateparks all over the usa. loads of potential.excitPlentysee us do more in developing countries too. more bang for buck / greater impact potential. but following the tsp model with lily and tony's guidance is the right place to start. just wish tHaveockup wasn't a low effort afterthought. it should be the title image and could be used for promotion. aside from public good vibes, the visual of the park is main benefit to the dao. it's what will appear in endless Loadsnt when gnars shredders visit with their frens. also the noggle rail is an 'opstacle' iykyk.skate parksUSALoads ExcitedMoreButJustItAsidedayItgearsfernsAlsotoggleobstacleinky

Positive

Positive

Very Nourish. Great to see the other Grants involved and this genuine partnership. Long Beach is the place. High proliferation impact as the result will by tebuy of thousands of photos and videos with ⌐◨-◨ in them. Maybe more. Gnarly prop. 🛹

Positive

Positive

Clearly we should get our contracts audited. One thing not mentioned in the prop, but I hope to see: sharing of the audit results.

Neutral

Positive

I want to see Nouns break into culture. I think tapping into art and the art scene is a great way to make this happen. Furthermore, I’m impressed by Artmatr’s custom tech and collaboration so far with Nouns. I’m supportive of this experiment and I’m betting the Artmatr Artistll exceed expectations. Furthermore, I, andArtist

Positive

Positive

We agree with the overall sentiment around conference activations and many are covered by OTG team

Neutral

Positive

Ambitious project with high quality physicals for Noun holders. These are the types of props we should be encouraging to explore more mediums to proliferate Nouns

Positive

Positive

Culturally aligned and high impact. Wish there were more details/mocks on the Nouns related elements but trust apenoun on it. let the kidape nounLet

Neutral

Positive

**FOR - 8 VOTES** **AGAINST - 40 VOTES** **ABSTAINS - 5 VOTES** **CHEF FO ⌐◧-◧** | *"props that only benefit noun holders are not the way"* **marxistmillionaire** | *"Great art, but I don't like the exclusiveness and I think 1001 Nouns are too much..."* **andrewladdusaw** | *"Too big and too expensive. "* **Bigshot Klim** | *"Too much friction about exclusivity and too many pieces. Great tech but the ask is too big "* **EltonPenguin** | *"Yikes!"*Big shotSlim

Negative

Positive

**FOR - 34 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *"Seems reasonable, next time please include the expected attendance for the event"* **AGAINST - 9 VOTES** **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** | *"lackCHEF FOcus"* **ABSTAINS - 11 VOTES**

Neutral

Positive

I really like the artist technology and there is probably a smaller scope collaboration with them that I would support, but this is too ambitious and not targeted enough

Neutral

Positive

The art / tech here is compelling, and we stand to benefit from continued expansion into the New York art scene. Prop 224 was intended to market the Nouns auction and increase prices. I think we stand to benefit from explicitly approaching this. Let's try to actually learn some lessons in the grand virtuous cycle experiment. In the previous prop past art was referenced as selling for more than 250k, yet the pieces from Prop 224 did not raise auction prices by anywhere close to that. We did not move the needle on auction prices as planned, there was a disconnect. But - they did a few things right. They raised auction prices in a way that was clearly attributed to their efforts, meaning they effectively caught people's attention and converted this into bids, proving that the approach is a possibility. They earned genuine enthusiasm from a number of Nouners during the week, I enjoyed their posts on twitter, the events they held, and this video: https://vimeo.com/829178232. I think it makes sense to readjust and try again, and they have. This proposal offers 1001 physical pieces at a significOwnersower per-piece cost to the DAO. On top of this, and most importantly, this is paired with 10 months of marketing, comms, and events. I am in favour of this proposal. For it to be considered a success, and receive further funding, we need to see a sustained increase in average auction price. If it increases by about 1 ETH over the next 264 days we break even. If this passes I hope the team puts serious effort into drawing attention to their art and the daily Nouns auction. I expect to see buzz on Twitter and other socials celebrating the Noun of the day.Twitterfavor

Positive

Positive