Datasets:

lituus

/

Intellinoun_NounsDAOSentiment

like 0

Agree w/noun40 & modrovsky

Neutral

Positive

Respect the passion and dedication of the crew in Brazil, but not convinced NFT branded events are the best allocation of Nouns resources.

Neutral

Positive

We've funded a lot of IRL activations at conferences and NFT events, and I'm not yet convinced we've seen evidence that it's been a productive form of outreach and engagement with the broader Ethereum community. I'm probably for pausing new instances of those types of experiences until we see evidence suggesting otherwise.

Neutral

Positive

This is awesome! Seriously grateful to the team for taking the feedback and coming back with a much more detailed and exciting plan. I also love incorporating vote reasons as design votes :) I prefer design A. I am skeptical of setting recommend retail below 1 USD, but defer to you all. Also, unsure on the claim > Nouns Wet Wipes will become a permanent item in the market after this initial investment of USD 31,450 + 2 ETH. but I hope it's true! Good luck! But

Positive

Positive

I understand why some would vote no for this proposal given the price tag and analytics. However, I see the content the Nourish team is putting out is one of the few things helping Nouns stay on brand. Without the brand Nouns is just another NFT project with a floor price that is trending down. The brand/culture is what will differentiate Nouns. Need to stick to the mission.

Neutral

Neutral

I mean, it's not that big of an ask. I think it's worth trying to see if we can get this distributed.

Neutral

Positive

A very Nourish mint. We should be experimenting more with DroposaProposals

Neutral

Neutral

Grateful for all the thoughtful reasons and both sides of this vote so far. Before buying a Noun, the content from Nourish was probably what impressed me most about the project. I really feel they are exceptionally good at what they do, and we are lucky to have them. As I think we've seen with the recent video contperfecte prizes, it is hard to get great content and it requires a good amount of admin overhead. I think the DAO funding competent, self-directed teams is an efficiency win and makes sense. Sometimes the most efficient decentralization is empowering several centralized teams! I absolutely open to funding other teams or organizing our spending through diff, andt means: prop house or whatever. But telling our story is very important--both externally as well as internally--and I don't think we should stop funding this while we wait to figure something else out. If we have an abundance of good storytelling happening, then we can decide how to optimize. The DAO is still in its infancy and it would feel like a huge loss to lose this team right now. I am comfortable spending 4% of the treasury/12% of annualized auction revenues on this. Finally, I'm not sure how much pressure we should put on this team re distribution. I am excited to see what they come up with, but I am also open to the idea that they are great storytellers (and the stories have organic reach, as we've seen!) and we can possibly solve for distribution separately. Thanks to the Nounish team for all the great work so far!, andre-distributionNourish

Positive

Positive

Love the video and song! Would love an annual recap like this of funding highlights :)

Positive

Positive

Love these little guys. Thanks for iterating on this project. Excited to have options for all Nouns!

Positive

Positive

Thanks to Keel for putting this up! Vote refund helps ensure maximum voter participation!

Positive

Positive

I am sad there is no pencil "yet"

Negative

Negative

Design (C) by Victor

Neutral

Neutral

Happy to give these figurines and Slim a chance after meeting him and seeing them in person last month. Would love to see more nouns and nounish things transition to the physical world.nourish

Positive

Positive

https://twitter.com/Goldypix/status/1658472216563154945 https://twitter.com/benjaminlatsko/status/1658421062550319106 https://twitter.com/0Hindsight/status/1657856004762025990 Some really great discourse around this prop. Ultimately side with the arguments made by Wilson and Benjamin, with the caveat that I think Nourish still hasn't found 'product/market' fit for their talents. I'd love to see more experimentation in the next 6 months and would probably not vote FOR a third renewal if this term 'only' yields more marketing videos. Special thanks to Goldy, 142 and the rest of the team for all their hard work and the risks they've taken going 'all in' on Nouns.Gold

Neutral

Positive

The Nouns' ecosystem is a bubble. (Maybe the best bubble around imo,IMOt a bubble nonetheless.) Producing high quality video content is perhaps the most important thing we can do as a community to try and tell our story to people outside that bubble. The videos Nounish produces are doubly important, because while they reacNourishpeople in the moment and beautifully highlight what we are accomplishing as a DAO, these videos are also pieces evergreen content that are being woven together into a net to catch newcomers in the future, no matter how they find out about Nouns to begin with. If Noggles are featured in a SuperBowl commercial and there isat the momentengaging Nounish content to catch the resulting eyeballs, did it even make a sound? Finally, all of Nounish’s content is CC0 and as a result, it is routinely remixed and reused, like a multimedia embodiment of Nouns itself. We are extremely lucky to have such a talented team dedicated to proliferating the Nouns brand, and in my opinion, it would be a mistake not to extend their engagement here. GogglesSuperbowlNourishNourish

Positive

Positive

As an avid consumer of Wet Wipes, I really don't think we need Nouns versions of them.

Neutral

Positive

This feels exciting and interesting. Mini-figures could become collectible!

Positive

Positive

I don't really have a good grasp of why/how this is important. So I'll vote Abstain!

Neutral

Negative

More votes, more reasons.

Neutral

Neutral

Design A, Londrina font ⌐◨-◨

Neutral

Neutral

Had this prop been for Nourish media in Chinese, I'd be more likely to vote yes. "Running social media campaigns" and re-purposing existing media doesn't feel like it needs 10 ETH/mo.

Neutral

Positive

See: Wilson, 4156, Toady for reasons.

Neutral

Neutral

Nourish creates the best nourish content. Droposals are fun Proposalsenue-generator for the DAO. A Nounish Droposal is a no-brainer.NourishProposal

Neutral

Positive

What Benjamin said here: https://twitter.com/benjaminlatsko/status/1658421062550319106. Creating amazing, timeless content is hard & Expensive. Distribution remains a challenge (not just for nourish but everyone else as well) and a hard problem to solve and i concur with the PMF aspect others have brought up. I would love to see Nounish team switch up the strategy to enable more eyes to find them, and find nouns. This won't happen overnight but I am optimistic that they will get there.NourishI

Neutral

Positive

Slim has proven himself, and this is a reasonable ask for a fun, useful project.

Positive

Positive

Creating more options for mechanisms for Nouns to issue payments is a net benefit even just to Nouns itself - should others fork the contract and use it for their own projects that's even better. Streaming payments based on time/milestones will be critical to Nouns supporting larger proposals that need to be chunked up. My only main concerns here are (1) what the competitive set of tools offer (like 0xSplits) and if they/others have similar solutions on roadmap, and (2) if there are better ways for this to be affiliated by Nouns (the website is cool, having Nouns graffiti in the contract code would be cooler). Regardless, I support the spirit of the proposal and hope it will improve the DAO's ability to allocate capital long term.

Positive

Positive

*On behalf of Ugly*

Neutral

Neutral

Voting YES so that this vote can be refunded.

Neutral

Positive

Interchangeable heads and glasses - bullish physical composability.

Neutral

Neutral

High quality, something I would personally collect even if i was not privy to the nIuns ecosystem. Klim's experience in production and logistics gives me confidencenouns'nd the prop. This was one noun-ish physical item i had probably asked multiple members mulSlime items about as i had wanted to buy them before. Looking forward to be able to buy them soon.nourishIIto being

Positive

Positive

*On behalf of Ugly*

Neutral

Neutral

*On behalf of Ugly*

Neutral

Neutral

*On behalf of Ugly*

Neutral

Neutral

Nom not nnourishfriends ShaSharedves supporting top tier builders passionate about Nouns and making it happen. BigShot ships! Bishopo see it. Can’t wait to hold these Nouns.

Positive

Positive

*On behalf of Ugly*

Neutral

Neutral

Perfectly absurd. Design A!

Negative

Positive

Many more much build pls, k thanks breeze

Neutral

Positive

I believe the team does a great job of capturing the essence of Nouns! I met noun142 in April in NY and got a chance to see him brilliantly orchestrating another nounish filming at Times Square! I am also a big fan of nounish nourish Goldy! Likewise, Becco is amazing and become de facto a public face for NounsDAO. Looking forward to seeing more stories by the team.Furthermore, InourishgivesGoldBeccaNouns

Positive

Positive

Pls sir, may I have some more?

Neutral

Positive

⌐◨-◨ Can’t wait to buy these!

Positive

Neutral

Funding voter engagement++

Neutral

Neutral

Traditional social media marketing is boring. I’d rather vote for authentic ideas from the Chinese community. Thanks for the prop!

Positive

Positive

When I voted yes on the last nourish proposal, I gave the following reason: "I support this experiment, but only plan to support renewal if this generates meaningful impressions/views, even though I expect content to be high quality regardless" I appreciate the high quality content as well as Goldy and team being openGoldeedback, but even in the optimistic case I don't see a path to getting distribution to where it needs to be to justify the expense.

Neutral

Positive

While I appreciate the team’s efforts here (I love the UI!), several trusted technical folks have raised flags regarding issues with audits and clarity as to what’s being proposed and what has been implemented. For those reasons, I have to vote against.

Neutral

Positive

Nounish is nourish I'm having a hard time imagining the DAO without their work. I think there is significant value in having the same group of people continuously work at a problem especially when those people deeply understand nouns. moreMores 🙏gives

Positive

Neutral

L2 or Off chain Voting Needed

Neutral

Neutral

A country that subsidizes the Uber ride to the voting booth is a country I want to be part of.

Positive

Positive

Love to see v2 props going back unchain incorporating feedback. proposers seem uniquely posiProposers execute on their vision and the additional focus on marketing & distribution provides high conviction in getting the nouns brand+art in the eyes/hands of a ton of new people

Positive

Positive

As budget is high, Open Round may be suitable for this topic, open to all video/ contents creators and YouTubers.

Neutral

Neutral

+1 for physical objects of the digital world, love it.

Positive

Positive

I like it! I appreciate that they earnestly iterated on the feedback from the first proposal and came back with a better product and more thorough plans for distribution and marketing. It's the perfect amount of fun and weirdness for a Nouns prop at a reasonable ask.

Positive

Positive

Nom not 100 NNourishThings Great piece capturing some of the most fun moments from Nouns. SharkDASharedud to be represented and support this!

Positive

Positive

Nom not NNourish Amazing work from some of the most dedicated members of the DAO. This work has been essential for onboarding and can't wait for SE2 and all the joy it will bring.

Positive

Positive

My thesis as a delegate is: “Nouns has a unique role in the ecosystem as a gathering place around public goods.” My analysis of funding requests is: 1. Is this a public good? 2. Is this public good something that other organizations won’t fund, or that Nouns is uniquely best to fund? This proposal wants to build a sustainable, profitable business. Which is excellent! But it’s not building a public good. Likewise, there are many outlets for funding CPG branding plays, though they do often require some upfront capital. This proposal also feels like a “proliferate the meme” type of proposal, which is fun and interesting, but doesn’t serve public goods. For this reason, I was tempted to vote Against. At the same time, as I was analyzing this proposal, I began to think of all the ways this brand could serve public goods-oreineted goals. The design contest is an obvious starting point. Inviting artists to participate, and ideally having commissions or a portion of the profits flow back to them, is one way. The community contributions are strong here, showing that this brand is already acting as a gathering place. It could also help other groups bootstrap knowledge in building CPG brands. Ideally, the team could aid other groups wanting to launch Nouns-related CPG projects. In the long run, fewer of these projects would need to be funded by the DAO and could instead be funded by an ecosystem of self-sustaining CPG brands. For this reason, my inclination is to say yes to experimentation. I’d want to wait and see how this plays out before approving similar props. Does this end up as a community driven CPG initiative? If so, amazing! Does this continue forever as a self-sustaining wet wipes business business? A wonderful thing, but probably something that should have been funded by other venues. I am in favor of this proposal, but would want to wait for results before voting for similar proposals in the future. My favorite design is Option A.business

Neutral

Positive

My thesis as a delegate is: “Nouns has a unique role in the ecosystem as a gathering place around public goods.” The way the proposal points to composability makes it a yes. They can be incorporated into other Nouns-related initiatives, whether it’s meetups or media. If things go right, this can become an ecosystem that people mix and match, with this collection being one of the many styles. I wish that these were CC0 or made their process available for others to replicate. Having a lower-quality, CC0 version that can be remixed and 3D printed at home would be amazing. I would strongly encourage the team to submit a proposal that includes the ability to more easily remix and 3D print, to see bottom up proliferation of the mini figures. In the future, I would recommend that Nouns focuses on this a funding requirement to help further public goods. This group has already done good work, so I am voting for.

Positive

Positive

My thesis as a delegate is: “Nouns has a unique role in the ecosystem as a gathering place around public goods.” Easy yes. Let’s create drops of more great content.

Neutral

Positive

Nouns. An infinite work of moisturizing art. Fragrance free - for delicate skin. This is a funny, thoughtful prop. A pharmacy / retail tag team with extensive wet wipe experience. I appreciate the proposers' attention to costs. Everything here is very reasonable, the unit costs, design and marketing costs, and the fact that they only get paid if they sell all of the items. These would continue to be on the market with no additional costs to the DAO. On a simple level - easy, affordable merch for IRL activations. This feels like an entry point to a laall theegy and I'm excited to see where these efforts lead. I hope they continue to engage with designers on future projects, I don't know if I'm ever really willing to compromise on design quality. I hope they take their profits and reinvest into developing their own proliferation flywheel with this, contributing to future growth alongside Nouns DAO. On a tangent. I wonder if low-cost high-volume items is good for developing the brand, or if we should be targeting boutique high end products. But the ask is so reasonable here, and this carries the potent, andof becoming a self-sustaining Nouns proliferating flywheel. I say we let them wipe.high-enda self-sustaining noun

Positive

Positive

My thesis as a delegate is: “Nouns has a unique role in the ecosystem as a gathering place around public goods.” Most of my votes as a delegate focus on the “public goods” part of my thesis. This one is more unique, since it focuses on the “gathering place” part of the thesis. Explaining what Nouns do is extremely important. Even within Nouns, there are differing visions of the goal: A space for public goods? A meme to proliferate? A treasury that should focus on growth? When Nouns itself has so many different visions, it becomes especially important to synthesize and explain those visions to the world. As someone who’s worked on explaining complex spaces like DAOs from scratch, I know that this is really, really hard. Getting the messaging right, finding the right balance between simplicitymanynd then getting the content out into the world takes a long time. It’s a full-time job, and not one that is easy to decentralize. Just like how crypto startups shouldn’t decentralize before they have product-market fit, crypto media shouldn’t decentralize before they have “narrative-market fit”. I understand the desire to decentralize. I understand the concern about reach. I understand the hesitation about the size of the ask. But the reality is that, in my opinion, it’s too early for those things. Nouns needs to figure out how to tell its story, and frankly it’s not very good at it right now. Before we add many narratives and styles into the mix — which we should! — we should try to get one right. Let’s see what Nounish produces, give them time to accomplish the huge task in front of them, and then fund even more voices. Their content is easy to discover and remix — that is already a foundation for others to build on top of. The decentralization and reach will come in due time. It took half a decade for people to begin to understand what a DAO was. And then suddenly, it clicked for people all at once. Nouns is on a similar journey. Let’s give Nounish the timeFurthermore, Iand resources to grow. This won’t take months. It will take years. Let’s give them the ability to make this happen.Noun needsNourishareNourish

Positive

Positive

**FOR - 44 VOTES** **Big shot Klim** | *"this is a Slimastic way to recap and celebrate what we have all been working on. funds go back to the dao and to fund more fFunds **AGAINST - 6 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *"Mint price too high"*day

Negative

Positive

We like design A by Skipper Lee

Positive

Positive

My thesis as a delegate is: “Nouns has a unique role in the ecosystem as a gathering place around public goods.” I fully support bringing Nouns to more people around the world. That is an excellent and important goal. But that is a slow process, and one that takes time. Noun needs translation before it can start to do promotion. This proposal misses the mark by focusing on promotion and advertising so early on. We shouldn’t spend on ads before growing organically. When communities are new and delicate, they should grow slowly before trying to ramp up. Any localized version of Nouns will inherently be fragile at the start, if it is seeking to build a strong community. I would support a proposal only for translation, which is a small fraction of the requested budget. I don’t support marketing before this takes place for a long time. Ad spend is the wrong way to grow Nouns and misses the mark. Let’s help people around the world understand Nouns first, and they will find us when they align with the mission.

Negative

Positive

**FOR - 38 VOTES** **Big shot Klim** | *"This is anSlimolute HELL YES "* **profwerder** | *"Nounish is the core marketprofferedtructure for Nouns. Their content has been amazing!"* **CHEFFO ⌐◧-◧** Nourishone who votes against this based on numbers and cost has no idea how content is made or how brands grow...your newbie is showing...cost of views does not incCHEF FOost to produce the content...how do you not understand that?* *nounish is the best thing to happen to nouns and we are lucky to have people willing to dedicate their professional lives and reputations making content for nouns. 100% yes"* **AGAINST - 14 VOTES** **EltonPenguin** | *"Our last $969,000 that we paid nounish got us 3M views. That's a CPM of $323. For reference, Google search ads avernourish is $38.40. This means we paid roughly 10x a pretty average CPM for this exposure.* *The budget is way too high and, from what their track record shows, the impact just isn't there."*, andnourish

Neutral

Positive

I've met with Matthew and osama in eth dOsama and know that their heETHs are in the right placeDenverding their love for nouns and appreciation for public goods and the belief around the proliferation effect that nouns-branded / nouns-originated public goods can have. so while the questions the folks are raising are valid (re: seneca's comments) ISorust the team to be open minded / collaborative and work through the concerns. we need more values and incentive aligned (both of the builders are nouners!) technical teams building onchain tools for our onchain world and I'm very much supportive of this energy. Senecaopen-mindedWeownersunchainunchain, and

Positive

Positive

Generally positive on new ways to promote the nourish meme. Generally not tremendously interested in paid marketing for brand promotion as the best brands have organic promotion ("Half the money I spend on advertising is wasted; the trouble is I don't know which half.") However, open-sourcing the content and making everything made cc0 is valuable, and is the specific aspect that makes the proposal attractive.

Neutral

Positive

I feel similarly to Seneca and will papper's views. woulpaperort more organic bottoms up local activaWould / community events rather than social media marketing.

Neutral

Positive

This would be very valuable public good infra. Nounish

Neutral

Positive

Nourish is one of the best nouns marketing projects. Whenever I want to explain what nouns are, I link to nounish content.nourish

Positive

Positive

Haven't voted in a while. Was a nice surprise to have refunds. Let's keep it going.

Positive

Positive

Love the team, their work and love are strong, but we do need more results, so I agree with 4156 that I won't vote to extend again without more next time. How do we get juice and distribution from Nounish's works and the works they support boNourish do we get out of the echo chamber to the other side?

Neutral

Positive

Looking forward to seeing these IRL

Positive

Neutral

Great video showcasing the variety of things Nouns has funded, and purely positive/no cost for the DAO. Easy yes.

Positive

Positive

It's a big ask, but I do believe the Nounish team aNourishemely talented and not to mention very passionate about Nouns. They should be given more room to experiment with different types of content, different strategies for distribution, et cetera. We are very fortunate to have that team contributing to Nouns and I strongly believe for the time being, we should continue to fund them.

Positive

Positive

Don't think this type of marketing brings the right kind of awareness. Nouns are not a lifestyle brand, but a 'meaningfulness' brand.

Neutral

Neutral

I want to support this but I think this is one of the cases where its better for the communitit'so push back and let the prop builder come back with a more refined proposal (see eg senecas feedback). I also think there is much to gain from the team working more closelye.g.ith the immediate nouns community to get this product just right.Senecasnouns'

Neutral

Positive

⌐◨-◨

Neutral

Neutral

I am voting based on my conviction that the most successful subcommunities/subdaos are born out of organic growth. from my experiencSundays proven beneficial to let these communities develop naturally, driven by the passion and initiaFrom of dedicated builders who are nouns-fans. these builders, with their deep understanding and appreciation for the ecosystem, can genuinely engage the community and drive meaningful growth. therefore, i believe that funding should primarily serve to amplifTheseeady established interest and activity, rather than incentivizing its initiation. this approach helps ensure the authenticity and long-term sustainability of these subcommunities/subdaos, as they are grounded in genuine enthusiasm and engagement rather than artificial stimulation.ThereforeIThisSundays

Positive

Positive

The content from Nourish is extremely high quality and it's importa, andor us to maintain continuity. I’m looking forward to seeing Nounish tell new stories and capture more attention for NounNourisho want to see distribution improve and the team has convinced me they have a plan. , and

Neutral

Positive

I would like to see more details in terms of the web3 landscape in China and reasons why it is a good marketfor Nouns to target besides it just market forulous. Also, based on the points made by the proposers it seems like it might be more fitting to create new content specifically for the chinese culture then to use the ones that cater to the west. I believe the idea is worth exploring, would just like to see a slightly differenChineseach.than

Neutral

Positive

Noun requires a media/content generation arm to document and highlight various initiatives happening (often in parallel). In our opinion the content has been high quality and hope to see more done on the marketing/distribution of it moving forward.

Neutral

Positive

We echo other's opinions that legacy activations are unlikely to have a meaningful attention ROI for us.

Neutral

Positive

Insert goggles aASCII

Neutral

Neutral

The DAO should continue to invest in methods to lower the voting barrier

Neutral

Negative

While we appreciate the retro reward attempt, there were money losing bugs in the only audit conducted. We would be happy to vote yes after another audit by a reputable firm. the proposing team may consider working with the tech pod on such initiatives in the future as wellThe

Neutral

Positive

There is a definite need for milestone payments. In the event that we do need to halt funding to a project, milestone dates provide specific moments where the DAO can focus attention on evaluating proposal outcomes. This also adds incentive for proposers to create reasonable timelines and goals that they need to hit. I am supportive of development in this area. This proposal is to retrofund an audit by 0xMacro and cover deployment costs. In general I think this is reasonable ask, however in proposal discussions further serious issues were found with the code. The audit clearly states "this audit should not solely be relied upon for security". Suddenly covering the audit costs becomes less compelling. So what are we supposed to do? What should we rely on for security? Multiple audits? Code4rena? Is there a way to formageneral,d decentralize how we approach both DAO upgrades and contract interactions? I am abstaining on this one.to askCoherent

Neutral

Positive

I am for more flexible payment options but support taking more time + audits based on sold & co's feedback

Neutral

Positive

Refund makes voting very accessible for low cost to the DAO. I think the governance landscape would look a lot different if users had to actually pay $10 for each vote.

Positive

Negative

Love efforts like this however, as it stands there are too many loose ends and inconsistencies in the prop for me to support. Looking forward to a future submission that incorporates feedback given

Neutral

Positive

It's important to support our teams who are proliferating and spreading Nouns to new subcultures. More important than arbitrary positions like "I don't support NFT conference sponsorships". In fact this is one of those sponsorships that will result in positive returns, creating more Nouns fans and motivate the Nouns/Gears Brazil team to continue to do great work. This entire effort is oozing with Nounish authenticity. Nouns is an infinite artwork and this event provides a canvas for this prolific community to create more art.Nourish

Positive

Positive

Hey guys, I am the proposer of 295 and builder of the ska table Noggles for I ❤ XV event, AKA Vlad / sktbrd.eth. I amGogglesenting a great group of builders that started to build on Nouns after NFT.Rio prop 98storyuding JP, Bob Burnquist, Guiriba, Lucas Santiago and others. Read the list of builderETHn the prop. After this first explanation and gathering of nouns community in NFT.Rio many things happened please check and understand where all this comes from -> https:// Riomgur.com/P10GPfy.jpg Please read this image and the new disclamer of the proposal changes accordinly with the community feedback. We lowered the sponsorship package, adapted the metaverse action and weBurnoutaborating with aubtoshi for merch, the proposal is 55% cheaper but as Nounish as it can be. We made everything possible to make this happen, would be just SAD to all of us if it didnt. This is not just aGuinea. With the event coming, we had the chance to prepare a great OOH media operation, and we created this great package of proliferation, onboarding and celebration. Nouns is already displayed in airports in e moment I am typing this comment. And Bob Burnquist, one of the founders and speakers, will be explaining nouns for thousand of people in the event and also in broadcast TV like he did yesterday. Among other great achievements like bringing Van Gogh, Kobe Bryant and Michael Jacksons pieces sold in NFTs to the eyes of 5000 kids from G10 Riovelas project that will be brought to the expo with the help of Sao Paulo city mayor. Which we have full support during and after the event to boost our public goods side of it, handled by SkateCuida Institute please check : https://twitter.com/vladhzc/status/1659662565729878023 NFT.Brasil is already planned to happen 3 years in a row its safe to say that th more than an event it is a movement started mostly by the ⌐◨-◨.br community. Everything we did so far has been working and proliferating, you can feel and also check the numbers. Most of the biggest views and engagements comes from Brazil because what we decided to do with the noggles. Numbers from BR community in Nounish media: https://twitter.com/vladhzc/status/1659545667197448194 Some of you guys are not→nto sponsoring NFT conferences right now, our timing is different in the 3rd world folks, we NEED this to happen, i am asking to take a look on our flawless building history and trust us, we know what we are doing, this is what we need, right now. Sorry if its not a perfect english text, I am writing this gpt-less from my heart. Let Brazil Surprise Nouns Once Again 🇧🇷⌐◨-◨ 🇧🇷 disclaimeraccordingly, andautosNourishdidn'tareat the momentBurnouta thousand São PauloStatehood BrasilIt'sBRgogglesNourish Iit'sEnglishgutless

Positive

Positive

Reading through the votes, it appears there are some issues with the contract/audit. Insofar as that is true I'm not sure if it makes sense to retrofund the audit. But, I do like the work that's been done and think it makes sense for Nouns to fund in a future proposal.

Neutral

Positive

I don't feel good about supporting this type of event. I don't think itit'sn effective or interesting way of spreading nouns. On the other hand, i admit that i don't understand the Brazilian nouns community enouIh (how it came to be, how it grows, etc) to confidently vote against. Happy to support the team in other ways in the future.Inouns'etc.

Neutral

Positive

This proposal is important to help cement and grow Nouns presence in the passionate community that is Brazil. Again I see this is as more than just sponsoring an NFT event. Nouns will get massive exposure, not only to the web3 community, but people in general across many cities. Most of my other arguments for the last proposal stand, only now the DAO is getting even better value. https://paragraph.xyz/@thebower/nouns-dao-active-governance-9

Positive

Positive

yeah, perhaps we’ve done enough conferences, but not every market is the same. Brazil are at a different point in their adoption curve than most voter locales. their political and economic climate is different too. as founder of a daoTheire a third of members are brazilian, i have witnessed passion similar to what i felt when i first found crypto. let’s give this market the chance we’ve had in our own. this crew always over deliver anAstheir concept for the skate simulator is giving me “opstacle” vibes. excited to see the excitement around nouns in a key market at an important stage in its development. dayBrazilianIIILetThisobstacleExcited

Positive

Positive

I want that shirt

Neutral

Positive

Voting on behalf of Nouner

Neutral

Neutral

Running to get that t-shirt. Super reasonable ask for a very meaningful mode of proliferation.

Neutral

Positive

Big runner here, love to get a t-shirt!

Positive

Positive

(noun40 voting via Agora) love the wholesome local offchain activationoff chain

Positive

Positive

(quick note: first time voting via the nouns' agora proxy contract so not sure how thAgoraress resolves on other governance clients but this is noun40) I was on the fence but erring on the side of supporting t, butounsBR team / community here. the team got the message loud and clear that the dao would prefer standalone unique local activations opposed to nft conference sponsorships, but seeing this prop backNouns BR board it seems to be an event that is very important to the nouns br community and they've done everything they can to make this particular prop work so I'm changing my vote to a yes.ThedayNFTBR, and, so

Positive

Positive