messages
listlengths
2
2
reward
float64
-4.09
3.63
weight
float64
1
1.27
[ { "content": "Definition: You will be given a topic and an argument. Decide the argument's stance towards that topic. The argument's stance is in favor or against the topic. If the argument supports that topic, answer with \"in favor\"; otherwise, if the argument opposes the topic, answer with \"against\".\nInput: topic: Bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki\nargument: Bombing Japan was the lesser evil among the alternatives\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "in favor", "role": "assistant" } ]
0.095215
1
[ { "content": "Definition: You will be given a topic and an argument. Decide the argument's stance towards that topic. The argument's stance is in favor or against the topic. If the argument supports that topic, answer with \"in favor\"; otherwise, if the argument opposes the topic, answer with \"against\".\nInput: topic: Bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki\nargument: Bombing Japan was the lesser evil among the alternatives\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "in favor", "role": "assistant" } ]
0.095215
1
[ { "content": "Definition: You will be given a topic and an argument. Decide the argument's stance towards that topic. The argument's stance is in favor or against the topic. If the argument supports that topic, answer with \"in favor\"; otherwise, if the argument opposes the topic, answer with \"against\".\nInput: topic: Bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki\nargument: Bombing Japan was the lesser evil among the alternatives\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "in favor", "role": "assistant" } ]
0.095215
1
[ { "content": "Definition: You will be given a topic and an argument. Decide the argument's stance towards that topic. The argument's stance is in favor or against the topic. If the argument supports that topic, answer with \"in favor\"; otherwise, if the argument opposes the topic, answer with \"against\".\nInput: topic: Bombing Hiroshima and Nagasaki\nargument: Bombing Japan was the lesser evil among the alternatives\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "in favor", "role": "assistant" } ]
0.095215
1
[ { "content": "You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.\nIn this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.\n\nStatement: because there are just too many bills Choices: 1. I can't save any money because there are just too many bills. 2. There aren't any bills. 3. There are a lot of bills.\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "2", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.59375
1
[ { "content": "You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.\nIn this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.\n\nStatement: because there are just too many bills Choices: 1. I can't save any money because there are just too many bills. 2. There aren't any bills. 3. There are a lot of bills.\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "2", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.59375
1
[ { "content": "You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.\nIn this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.\n\nStatement: because there are just too many bills Choices: 1. I can't save any money because there are just too many bills. 2. There aren't any bills. 3. There are a lot of bills.\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "2", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.59375
1
[ { "content": "You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.\nIn this task, you're given a statement, and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine which sentence clearly disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3' corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence.\n\nStatement: because there are just too many bills Choices: 1. I can't save any money because there are just too many bills. 2. There aren't any bills. 3. There are a lot of bills.\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "2", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.59375
1
[ { "content": "Read the passage and find if the passage agrees, disagrees, or has a neutral stance on whether Global warming is caused by human activities. Answer only with keyword (a) agrees - if passage agrees with the target (b) disagrees - if passage disagrees with the target (c) neutral - if the given passage neither agrees nor disagrees with the target. You don't need to use external knowledge in this task, and you have to answer based on the given passage.\n\nExample input: Most global warming is natural and even if there had been no Industrial Revolution current global temperatures would be almost exactly the same as they are now.\nExample output: disagrees\nExample explanation: The sentence explicitly states the global warming is natural. It also adds the temperatures would be the same even without industries. Therefore the sentence disagrees with the target.\nQ: Global temperature increases have been far, far less than doomsday computer models predicted – about three times smaller.\nA:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "a", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.4375
1
[ { "content": "Read the passage and find if the passage agrees, disagrees, or has a neutral stance on whether Global warming is caused by human activities. Answer only with keyword (a) agrees - if passage agrees with the target (b) disagrees - if passage disagrees with the target (c) neutral - if the given passage neither agrees nor disagrees with the target. You don't need to use external knowledge in this task, and you have to answer based on the given passage.\n\nExample input: Most global warming is natural and even if there had been no Industrial Revolution current global temperatures would be almost exactly the same as they are now.\nExample output: disagrees\nExample explanation: The sentence explicitly states the global warming is natural. It also adds the temperatures would be the same even without industries. Therefore the sentence disagrees with the target.\nQ: Global temperature increases have been far, far less than doomsday computer models predicted – about three times smaller.\nA:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "a", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.4375
1
[ { "content": "Read the passage and find if the passage agrees, disagrees, or has a neutral stance on whether Global warming is caused by human activities. Answer only with keyword (a) agrees - if passage agrees with the target (b) disagrees - if passage disagrees with the target (c) neutral - if the given passage neither agrees nor disagrees with the target. You don't need to use external knowledge in this task, and you have to answer based on the given passage.\n\nExample input: Most global warming is natural and even if there had been no Industrial Revolution current global temperatures would be almost exactly the same as they are now.\nExample output: disagrees\nExample explanation: The sentence explicitly states the global warming is natural. It also adds the temperatures would be the same even without industries. Therefore the sentence disagrees with the target.\nQ: Global temperature increases have been far, far less than doomsday computer models predicted – about three times smaller.\nA:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "a", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.4375
1
[ { "content": "Read the passage and find if the passage agrees, disagrees, or has a neutral stance on whether Global warming is caused by human activities. Answer only with keyword (a) agrees - if passage agrees with the target (b) disagrees - if passage disagrees with the target (c) neutral - if the given passage neither agrees nor disagrees with the target. You don't need to use external knowledge in this task, and you have to answer based on the given passage.\n\nExample input: Most global warming is natural and even if there had been no Industrial Revolution current global temperatures would be almost exactly the same as they are now.\nExample output: disagrees\nExample explanation: The sentence explicitly states the global warming is natural. It also adds the temperatures would be the same even without industries. Therefore the sentence disagrees with the target.\nQ: Global temperature increases have been far, far less than doomsday computer models predicted – about three times smaller.\nA:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "a", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.4375
1
[ { "content": "In this task, you will be given sentences in which your task is to recognize the name of a person. Note that Twitter names shouldn't be considered as people's names. Although there might be several correct answers, you need to write one of them.\n\nQ: #valuingourvote Claire Trevett , chair of the New Zealand press gallery addressing the conference on media & elections http://t.co/fy2xiDDH1e\n\nA: Claire Trevett\n****\nQ: Texas Governor Rick Perry 's Attorney Once Tried to Turn Him in to the FBI http://t.co/tYA28xioaR\n\nA: Governor Rick Perry\n****\nQ: Bertie Ahern 's last hurrah : the 2007 general election : http://t.co/DANgnVzQ4u\n\nA:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Bertie Ahern", "role": "assistant" } ]
2.21875
1
[ { "content": "In this task, you will be given sentences in which your task is to recognize the name of a person. Note that Twitter names shouldn't be considered as people's names. Although there might be several correct answers, you need to write one of them.\n\nQ: #valuingourvote Claire Trevett , chair of the New Zealand press gallery addressing the conference on media & elections http://t.co/fy2xiDDH1e\n\nA: Claire Trevett\n****\nQ: Texas Governor Rick Perry 's Attorney Once Tried to Turn Him in to the FBI http://t.co/tYA28xioaR\n\nA: Governor Rick Perry\n****\nQ: Bertie Ahern 's last hurrah : the 2007 general election : http://t.co/DANgnVzQ4u\n\nA:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Bertie Ahern", "role": "assistant" } ]
2.21875
1
[ { "content": "In this task, you will be given sentences in which your task is to recognize the name of a person. Note that Twitter names shouldn't be considered as people's names. Although there might be several correct answers, you need to write one of them.\n\nQ: #valuingourvote Claire Trevett , chair of the New Zealand press gallery addressing the conference on media & elections http://t.co/fy2xiDDH1e\n\nA: Claire Trevett\n****\nQ: Texas Governor Rick Perry 's Attorney Once Tried to Turn Him in to the FBI http://t.co/tYA28xioaR\n\nA: Governor Rick Perry\n****\nQ: Bertie Ahern 's last hurrah : the 2007 general election : http://t.co/DANgnVzQ4u\n\nA:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Bertie Ahern", "role": "assistant" } ]
2.21875
1
[ { "content": "In this task, you will be given sentences in which your task is to recognize the name of a person. Note that Twitter names shouldn't be considered as people's names. Although there might be several correct answers, you need to write one of them.\n\nQ: #valuingourvote Claire Trevett , chair of the New Zealand press gallery addressing the conference on media & elections http://t.co/fy2xiDDH1e\n\nA: Claire Trevett\n****\nQ: Texas Governor Rick Perry 's Attorney Once Tried to Turn Him in to the FBI http://t.co/tYA28xioaR\n\nA: Governor Rick Perry\n****\nQ: Bertie Ahern 's last hurrah : the 2007 general election : http://t.co/DANgnVzQ4u\n\nA:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Bertie Ahern", "role": "assistant" } ]
2.21875
1
[ { "content": "Q: This task is about identifying the subject of a given sentence. The subject of a sentence is the person, place, or thing that is performing the action of the sentence. The subject represents what or whom the sentence is about. Each sentence in this task is guaranteed to contain a single subject. The input is a sentence and the output is the identified subject of that sentence.\nThe lane is 7.and name is Jenna Laukkanen.\nA:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The subject of the sentence is \"The lane\".", "role": "assistant" } ]
1.757813
1
[ { "content": "Q: This task is about identifying the subject of a given sentence. The subject of a sentence is the person, place, or thing that is performing the action of the sentence. The subject represents what or whom the sentence is about. Each sentence in this task is guaranteed to contain a single subject. The input is a sentence and the output is the identified subject of that sentence.\nThe lane is 7.and name is Jenna Laukkanen.\nA:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The subject of the sentence is \"The lane\".", "role": "assistant" } ]
1.757813
1
[ { "content": "Q: This task is about identifying the subject of a given sentence. The subject of a sentence is the person, place, or thing that is performing the action of the sentence. The subject represents what or whom the sentence is about. Each sentence in this task is guaranteed to contain a single subject. The input is a sentence and the output is the identified subject of that sentence.\nThe lane is 7.and name is Jenna Laukkanen.\nA:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The subject of the sentence is \"The lane\".", "role": "assistant" } ]
1.757813
1
[ { "content": "Q: This task is about identifying the subject of a given sentence. The subject of a sentence is the person, place, or thing that is performing the action of the sentence. The subject represents what or whom the sentence is about. Each sentence in this task is guaranteed to contain a single subject. The input is a sentence and the output is the identified subject of that sentence.\nThe lane is 7.and name is Jenna Laukkanen.\nA:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The subject of the sentence is \"The lane\".", "role": "assistant" } ]
1.757813
1
[ { "content": "Instructions: A question that is free of any grammatical or logcal errors, should be labeled 'yes', otherwise it should be indicated as 'no'. A question is grammatically correct if all its entities i.e. nouns, verbs, adjectives, prepositions, pronouns, adverbs are at appropriate position. A question is logically correct if the semantic makes sense.\nInput: Sentence: In school, Atta came across as very intelligent and reasonably pleasant, with an excellent command of the German language. \nQuestion: How long was Atta in the school?\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "no", "role": "assistant" } ]
-3.421875
1
[ { "content": "Instructions: A question that is free of any grammatical or logcal errors, should be labeled 'yes', otherwise it should be indicated as 'no'. A question is grammatically correct if all its entities i.e. nouns, verbs, adjectives, prepositions, pronouns, adverbs are at appropriate position. A question is logically correct if the semantic makes sense.\nInput: Sentence: In school, Atta came across as very intelligent and reasonably pleasant, with an excellent command of the German language. \nQuestion: How long was Atta in the school?\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "no", "role": "assistant" } ]
-3.421875
1
[ { "content": "Instructions: A question that is free of any grammatical or logcal errors, should be labeled 'yes', otherwise it should be indicated as 'no'. A question is grammatically correct if all its entities i.e. nouns, verbs, adjectives, prepositions, pronouns, adverbs are at appropriate position. A question is logically correct if the semantic makes sense.\nInput: Sentence: In school, Atta came across as very intelligent and reasonably pleasant, with an excellent command of the German language. \nQuestion: How long was Atta in the school?\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "No", "role": "assistant" } ]
-3.421875
1
[ { "content": "Instructions: A question that is free of any grammatical or logcal errors, should be labeled 'yes', otherwise it should be indicated as 'no'. A question is grammatically correct if all its entities i.e. nouns, verbs, adjectives, prepositions, pronouns, adverbs are at appropriate position. A question is logically correct if the semantic makes sense.\nInput: Sentence: In school, Atta came across as very intelligent and reasonably pleasant, with an excellent command of the German language. \nQuestion: How long was Atta in the school?\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "no", "role": "assistant" } ]
-3.421875
1
[ { "content": "TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given the name of an Indian food dish. You need to return whether the dish is \"non vegetarian\" or \"vegetarian\". Do not answer with any words other than those two.\nPROBLEM: Biryani\n\nSOLUTION: non vegetarian\n\nPROBLEM: Adhirasam\n\nSOLUTION: vegetarian\n\nPROBLEM: Lyangcha\n\nSOLUTION:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "vegetarian", "role": "assistant" } ]
-0.589844
1
[ { "content": "TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given the name of an Indian food dish. You need to return whether the dish is \"non vegetarian\" or \"vegetarian\". Do not answer with any words other than those two.\nPROBLEM: Biryani\n\nSOLUTION: non vegetarian\n\nPROBLEM: Adhirasam\n\nSOLUTION: vegetarian\n\nPROBLEM: Lyangcha\n\nSOLUTION:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "vegetarian", "role": "assistant" } ]
-0.589844
1
[ { "content": "TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given the name of an Indian food dish. You need to return whether the dish is \"non vegetarian\" or \"vegetarian\". Do not answer with any words other than those two.\nPROBLEM: Biryani\n\nSOLUTION: non vegetarian\n\nPROBLEM: Adhirasam\n\nSOLUTION: vegetarian\n\nPROBLEM: Lyangcha\n\nSOLUTION:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "vegetarian", "role": "assistant" } ]
-0.589844
1
[ { "content": "TASK DEFINITION: In this task, you are given the name of an Indian food dish. You need to return whether the dish is \"non vegetarian\" or \"vegetarian\". Do not answer with any words other than those two.\nPROBLEM: Biryani\n\nSOLUTION: non vegetarian\n\nPROBLEM: Adhirasam\n\nSOLUTION: vegetarian\n\nPROBLEM: Lyangcha\n\nSOLUTION:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "vegetarian", "role": "assistant" } ]
-0.589844
1
[ { "content": "In this task, you will be shown a short story with a beginning, two potential middles, and an ending. Your job is to choose the middle statement that makes the story coherent / plausible by writing \"1\" or \"2\" in the output. If both sentences are plausible, pick the one that makes most sense.\n\nBeginning: the fisherman set out to check his lobster traps. Middle 1: He could not haul in the heavy lobster traps. Middle 2: He hauled in the lobster traps even though they were heavy. Ending: They were full of big fat lobsters", "role": "user" }, { "content": "1", "role": "assistant" } ]
-1.460938
1
[ { "content": "In this task, you will be shown a short story with a beginning, two potential middles, and an ending. Your job is to choose the middle statement that makes the story coherent / plausible by writing \"1\" or \"2\" in the output. If both sentences are plausible, pick the one that makes most sense.\n\nBeginning: the fisherman set out to check his lobster traps. Middle 1: He could not haul in the heavy lobster traps. Middle 2: He hauled in the lobster traps even though they were heavy. Ending: They were full of big fat lobsters", "role": "user" }, { "content": "1", "role": "assistant" } ]
-1.460938
1
[ { "content": "In this task, you will be shown a short story with a beginning, two potential middles, and an ending. Your job is to choose the middle statement that makes the story coherent / plausible by writing \"1\" or \"2\" in the output. If both sentences are plausible, pick the one that makes most sense.\n\nBeginning: the fisherman set out to check his lobster traps. Middle 1: He could not haul in the heavy lobster traps. Middle 2: He hauled in the lobster traps even though they were heavy. Ending: They were full of big fat lobsters", "role": "user" }, { "content": "1", "role": "assistant" } ]
-1.460938
1
[ { "content": "In this task, you will be shown a short story with a beginning, two potential middles, and an ending. Your job is to choose the middle statement that makes the story coherent / plausible by writing \"1\" or \"2\" in the output. If both sentences are plausible, pick the one that makes most sense.\n\nBeginning: the fisherman set out to check his lobster traps. Middle 1: He could not haul in the heavy lobster traps. Middle 2: He hauled in the lobster traps even though they were heavy. Ending: They were full of big fat lobsters", "role": "user" }, { "content": "1", "role": "assistant" } ]
-1.460938
1
[ { "content": "Give 2 examples of web browsers.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Here are 2 examples of web browsers:\n\n1. Google Chrome\n2. Mozilla Firefox", "role": "assistant" } ]
-0.213867
1
[ { "content": "Give 2 examples of web browsers.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Here are 2 examples of web browsers:\n\n1. Google Chrome\n2. Mozilla Firefox", "role": "assistant" } ]
-0.213867
1
[ { "content": "Give 2 examples of web browsers.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Here are 2 examples of web browsers:\n\n1. Google Chrome\n2. Mozilla Firefox", "role": "assistant" } ]
-0.213867
1
[ { "content": "Give 2 examples of web browsers.", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Here are 2 examples of web browsers:\n\n1. Google Chrome\n2. Mozilla Firefox", "role": "assistant" } ]
-0.213867
1
[ { "content": "Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, you will be shown an English sentence. You need to classify the sentence as either a representation of an adjunct island or as an incorrect representation. A correct representation should be denoted as 'good' while everything else should be denoted as 'bad'. A correct representation of an adjunct island will be a grammatically correct instance of a sentence using an adjunct island. An incorrect representation will be everything else.\n\nWho would Andrea care for while discovering those guys?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "bad", "role": "assistant" } ]
-4
1
[ { "content": "Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, you will be shown an English sentence. You need to classify the sentence as either a representation of an adjunct island or as an incorrect representation. A correct representation should be denoted as 'good' while everything else should be denoted as 'bad'. A correct representation of an adjunct island will be a grammatically correct instance of a sentence using an adjunct island. An incorrect representation will be everything else.\n\nWho would Andrea care for while discovering those guys?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "bad", "role": "assistant" } ]
-4
1
[ { "content": "Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, you will be shown an English sentence. You need to classify the sentence as either a representation of an adjunct island or as an incorrect representation. A correct representation should be denoted as 'good' while everything else should be denoted as 'bad'. A correct representation of an adjunct island will be a grammatically correct instance of a sentence using an adjunct island. An incorrect representation will be everything else.\n\nWho would Andrea care for while discovering those guys?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "bad", "role": "assistant" } ]
-4
1
[ { "content": "Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, you will be shown an English sentence. You need to classify the sentence as either a representation of an adjunct island or as an incorrect representation. A correct representation should be denoted as 'good' while everything else should be denoted as 'bad'. A correct representation of an adjunct island will be a grammatically correct instance of a sentence using an adjunct island. An incorrect representation will be everything else.\n\nWho would Andrea care for while discovering those guys?\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "bad", "role": "assistant" } ]
-4
1
[ { "content": "Detailed Instructions: In this task, you're given two sentences. Indicate if the first sentence clearly entails the second sentence (i.e., one can conclude the 2nd sentence by reading the 1st one). Indicate your answer with '1' if the first sentence entails the second sentence, otherwise answer with '0'.\nQ: Sentence 1: A report prepared by a five member UN commission noted \"killing of civilians, enforced disappearances, destruction of villages, rape and other forms of sexual violence, pillaging and forced displacement, throughout Darfur\", and secretly named alleged war criminals that should go before the ICC. Sentence 2: More than 200,000 people were killed in the air attack in the Darfur region.\nA:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.859375
1
[ { "content": "Detailed Instructions: In this task, you're given two sentences. Indicate if the first sentence clearly entails the second sentence (i.e., one can conclude the 2nd sentence by reading the 1st one). Indicate your answer with '1' if the first sentence entails the second sentence, otherwise answer with '0'.\nQ: Sentence 1: A report prepared by a five member UN commission noted \"killing of civilians, enforced disappearances, destruction of villages, rape and other forms of sexual violence, pillaging and forced displacement, throughout Darfur\", and secretly named alleged war criminals that should go before the ICC. Sentence 2: More than 200,000 people were killed in the air attack in the Darfur region.\nA:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.859375
1
[ { "content": "Detailed Instructions: In this task, you're given two sentences. Indicate if the first sentence clearly entails the second sentence (i.e., one can conclude the 2nd sentence by reading the 1st one). Indicate your answer with '1' if the first sentence entails the second sentence, otherwise answer with '0'.\nQ: Sentence 1: A report prepared by a five member UN commission noted \"killing of civilians, enforced disappearances, destruction of villages, rape and other forms of sexual violence, pillaging and forced displacement, throughout Darfur\", and secretly named alleged war criminals that should go before the ICC. Sentence 2: More than 200,000 people were killed in the air attack in the Darfur region.\nA:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.859375
1
[ { "content": "Detailed Instructions: In this task, you're given two sentences. Indicate if the first sentence clearly entails the second sentence (i.e., one can conclude the 2nd sentence by reading the 1st one). Indicate your answer with '1' if the first sentence entails the second sentence, otherwise answer with '0'.\nQ: Sentence 1: A report prepared by a five member UN commission noted \"killing of civilians, enforced disappearances, destruction of villages, rape and other forms of sexual violence, pillaging and forced displacement, throughout Darfur\", and secretly named alleged war criminals that should go before the ICC. Sentence 2: More than 200,000 people were killed in the air attack in the Darfur region.\nA:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "0", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.859375
1
[ { "content": "Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, You are given an amazon food product review and its summary. Your task is to Generate \"True\" if given review and its summary match, otherwise generate \"False\".\n\nIn my opinion, its an outrage that these treats which used to be Made in the US are now Made in China. The company did not advertize anywhere about this and we only found out accidentally while looking at the wrap for ingredients. Let me start my review stating that many of the current 5-star ratings here look suspiciously fake (made up). Its hard to imagine anyone writing something positive about them unless they fail to see reviews clearly warning buyers about these treats being Made in China. Hard to blame Chinese to manufacture them but its Dogwells fault for not realizing dangers of making them there with their poor record in food manufacturing from the past with food poisoning in pet food. \n Summary: WARNING: These dog treats are Made in CHINA. (We gave these to our dog who was diagnosed with an autoimmune disease & diabetes)\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "True", "role": "assistant" } ]
-3.125
1
[ { "content": "Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, You are given an amazon food product review and its summary. Your task is to Generate \"True\" if given review and its summary match, otherwise generate \"False\".\n\nIn my opinion, its an outrage that these treats which used to be Made in the US are now Made in China. The company did not advertize anywhere about this and we only found out accidentally while looking at the wrap for ingredients. Let me start my review stating that many of the current 5-star ratings here look suspiciously fake (made up). Its hard to imagine anyone writing something positive about them unless they fail to see reviews clearly warning buyers about these treats being Made in China. Hard to blame Chinese to manufacture them but its Dogwells fault for not realizing dangers of making them there with their poor record in food manufacturing from the past with food poisoning in pet food. \n Summary: WARNING: These dog treats are Made in CHINA. (We gave these to our dog who was diagnosed with an autoimmune disease & diabetes)\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "True", "role": "assistant" } ]
-3.125
1
[ { "content": "Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, You are given an amazon food product review and its summary. Your task is to Generate \"True\" if given review and its summary match, otherwise generate \"False\".\n\nIn my opinion, its an outrage that these treats which used to be Made in the US are now Made in China. The company did not advertize anywhere about this and we only found out accidentally while looking at the wrap for ingredients. Let me start my review stating that many of the current 5-star ratings here look suspiciously fake (made up). Its hard to imagine anyone writing something positive about them unless they fail to see reviews clearly warning buyers about these treats being Made in China. Hard to blame Chinese to manufacture them but its Dogwells fault for not realizing dangers of making them there with their poor record in food manufacturing from the past with food poisoning in pet food. \n Summary: WARNING: These dog treats are Made in CHINA. (We gave these to our dog who was diagnosed with an autoimmune disease & diabetes)\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "True", "role": "assistant" } ]
-3.125
1
[ { "content": "Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, You are given an amazon food product review and its summary. Your task is to Generate \"True\" if given review and its summary match, otherwise generate \"False\".\n\nIn my opinion, its an outrage that these treats which used to be Made in the US are now Made in China. The company did not advertize anywhere about this and we only found out accidentally while looking at the wrap for ingredients. Let me start my review stating that many of the current 5-star ratings here look suspiciously fake (made up). Its hard to imagine anyone writing something positive about them unless they fail to see reviews clearly warning buyers about these treats being Made in China. Hard to blame Chinese to manufacture them but its Dogwells fault for not realizing dangers of making them there with their poor record in food manufacturing from the past with food poisoning in pet food. \n Summary: WARNING: These dog treats are Made in CHINA. (We gave these to our dog who was diagnosed with an autoimmune disease & diabetes)\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "True", "role": "assistant" } ]
-3.125
1
[ { "content": "Instructions: You are given a sentence from a conversation between a human and a virtual assistant. Your task is to identify whether the sentence is a question or not. Answer with Yes or No.\nInput: No, that will be all and thank you again.\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Yes", "role": "assistant" } ]
-3.4375
1
[ { "content": "Instructions: You are given a sentence from a conversation between a human and a virtual assistant. Your task is to identify whether the sentence is a question or not. Answer with Yes or No.\nInput: No, that will be all and thank you again.\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "No.", "role": "assistant" } ]
-3.4375
1
[ { "content": "Instructions: You are given a sentence from a conversation between a human and a virtual assistant. Your task is to identify whether the sentence is a question or not. Answer with Yes or No.\nInput: No, that will be all and thank you again.\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Yes", "role": "assistant" } ]
-3.4375
1
[ { "content": "Instructions: You are given a sentence from a conversation between a human and a virtual assistant. Your task is to identify whether the sentence is a question or not. Answer with Yes or No.\nInput: No, that will be all and thank you again.\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "No.", "role": "assistant" } ]
-3.4375
1
[ { "content": "Instructions: In medical studies, treatments are tested within a group of study participants. You will be given a sentence of a study report in which your task is to list the phrases that give information about the participants of the study. You should list the phrases in the same order that they appear in the text, separated by commas. If no information about the participants is mentioned, just output \"not found\". Relevant information about participants include: gender, medical conditions, location, number of people participating. Do not contain participant mentions without relevant information.\nInput: Efforts to promote smoking cessation should highlight that individuals are likely to feel more rather than less psychologically healthy when they successfully quit smoking .\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "not found", "role": "assistant" } ]
-0.310547
1
[ { "content": "Instructions: In medical studies, treatments are tested within a group of study participants. You will be given a sentence of a study report in which your task is to list the phrases that give information about the participants of the study. You should list the phrases in the same order that they appear in the text, separated by commas. If no information about the participants is mentioned, just output \"not found\". Relevant information about participants include: gender, medical conditions, location, number of people participating. Do not contain participant mentions without relevant information.\nInput: Efforts to promote smoking cessation should highlight that individuals are likely to feel more rather than less psychologically healthy when they successfully quit smoking .\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "not found", "role": "assistant" } ]
-0.310547
1
[ { "content": "Instructions: In medical studies, treatments are tested within a group of study participants. You will be given a sentence of a study report in which your task is to list the phrases that give information about the participants of the study. You should list the phrases in the same order that they appear in the text, separated by commas. If no information about the participants is mentioned, just output \"not found\". Relevant information about participants include: gender, medical conditions, location, number of people participating. Do not contain participant mentions without relevant information.\nInput: Efforts to promote smoking cessation should highlight that individuals are likely to feel more rather than less psychologically healthy when they successfully quit smoking .\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "not found", "role": "assistant" } ]
-0.310547
1
[ { "content": "Instructions: In medical studies, treatments are tested within a group of study participants. You will be given a sentence of a study report in which your task is to list the phrases that give information about the participants of the study. You should list the phrases in the same order that they appear in the text, separated by commas. If no information about the participants is mentioned, just output \"not found\". Relevant information about participants include: gender, medical conditions, location, number of people participating. Do not contain participant mentions without relevant information.\nInput: Efforts to promote smoking cessation should highlight that individuals are likely to feel more rather than less psychologically healthy when they successfully quit smoking .\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "not found", "role": "assistant" } ]
-0.310547
1
[ { "content": "Definition: Two analogies that relate actions with their consequences are given in the form \"A : B. C : ?\". The phrase \"A : B\" relates action A to consequence B. Your task is to replace the question mark (?) with the appropriate consquence of the given action C, following the \"A : B\" relation. Your answer should be a single verb, without further explanation.\nInput: fear : flee. hit : ?\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "run", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.75
1
[ { "content": "Definition: Two analogies that relate actions with their consequences are given in the form \"A : B. C : ?\". The phrase \"A : B\" relates action A to consequence B. Your task is to replace the question mark (?) with the appropriate consquence of the given action C, following the \"A : B\" relation. Your answer should be a single verb, without further explanation.\nInput: fear : flee. hit : ?\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "run", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.75
1
[ { "content": "Definition: Two analogies that relate actions with their consequences are given in the form \"A : B. C : ?\". The phrase \"A : B\" relates action A to consequence B. Your task is to replace the question mark (?) with the appropriate consquence of the given action C, following the \"A : B\" relation. Your answer should be a single verb, without further explanation.\nInput: fear : flee. hit : ?\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "run", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.75
1
[ { "content": "Definition: Two analogies that relate actions with their consequences are given in the form \"A : B. C : ?\". The phrase \"A : B\" relates action A to consequence B. Your task is to replace the question mark (?) with the appropriate consquence of the given action C, following the \"A : B\" relation. Your answer should be a single verb, without further explanation.\nInput: fear : flee. hit : ?\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "run", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.75
1
[ { "content": "instruction:\nIn this task, you are given a sentence and a profession. The sentence mentions two professions: one's gender is identifiable using the coreference link with gendered pronouns and the other's gender is unidentifiable. You are expected to return whether the given profession's gender is identifiable or unidentifiable.\nquestion:\nSentence: The librarian guided the manager to the bookshelf and asked what he needed.\n Profession: manager\nanswer:\nIdentifiable\n\n\nquestion:\nSentence: The sheriff asked the editor to withdraw the story because she always wrote too many details.\n Profession: sheriff\nanswer:\nUnidentifiable\n\n\nquestion:\nSentence: The physician examined the hairdresser for cuts because he was concerned.\n Profession: physician\nanswer:\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Identifiable", "role": "assistant" } ]
1.390625
1
[ { "content": "instruction:\nIn this task, you are given a sentence and a profession. The sentence mentions two professions: one's gender is identifiable using the coreference link with gendered pronouns and the other's gender is unidentifiable. You are expected to return whether the given profession's gender is identifiable or unidentifiable.\nquestion:\nSentence: The librarian guided the manager to the bookshelf and asked what he needed.\n Profession: manager\nanswer:\nIdentifiable\n\n\nquestion:\nSentence: The sheriff asked the editor to withdraw the story because she always wrote too many details.\n Profession: sheriff\nanswer:\nUnidentifiable\n\n\nquestion:\nSentence: The physician examined the hairdresser for cuts because he was concerned.\n Profession: physician\nanswer:\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Identifiable", "role": "assistant" } ]
1.390625
1
[ { "content": "instruction:\nIn this task, you are given a sentence and a profession. The sentence mentions two professions: one's gender is identifiable using the coreference link with gendered pronouns and the other's gender is unidentifiable. You are expected to return whether the given profession's gender is identifiable or unidentifiable.\nquestion:\nSentence: The librarian guided the manager to the bookshelf and asked what he needed.\n Profession: manager\nanswer:\nIdentifiable\n\n\nquestion:\nSentence: The sheriff asked the editor to withdraw the story because she always wrote too many details.\n Profession: sheriff\nanswer:\nUnidentifiable\n\n\nquestion:\nSentence: The physician examined the hairdresser for cuts because he was concerned.\n Profession: physician\nanswer:\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Identifiable", "role": "assistant" } ]
1.390625
1
[ { "content": "instruction:\nIn this task, you are given a sentence and a profession. The sentence mentions two professions: one's gender is identifiable using the coreference link with gendered pronouns and the other's gender is unidentifiable. You are expected to return whether the given profession's gender is identifiable or unidentifiable.\nquestion:\nSentence: The librarian guided the manager to the bookshelf and asked what he needed.\n Profession: manager\nanswer:\nIdentifiable\n\n\nquestion:\nSentence: The sheriff asked the editor to withdraw the story because she always wrote too many details.\n Profession: sheriff\nanswer:\nUnidentifiable\n\n\nquestion:\nSentence: The physician examined the hairdresser for cuts because he was concerned.\n Profession: physician\nanswer:\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Identifiable", "role": "assistant" } ]
1.390625
1
[ { "content": "In this task, you are given a text which is the body of a document. Your job is to classify the topic of the document into these categories: 1)Company, 2)Educational Institution, 3)Artist, 4)Athlete, 5)Office Holder, 6)Mean of transportation, 7)Building, 8)Natural place, 9)Village, 10)Animal, 11)Plant, 12)Album, 13)Film, 14)Written work. Your output should be the category number. Don't generate anything apart from numbers 1-14.\nOne example: Text: Abbott of Farnham E D Abbott Limited was a British coachbuilding business based in Farnham Surrey trading under that name from 1929. A major part of their output was under sub-contract to motor vehicle manufacturers. Their business closed in 1972.\nSolution is here: 1\nExplanation: Here, the given text is about a British coachbuilding business company. Hence, it is a correct answer.\n\nNow, solve this: Text: Dąbie [ˈdɔmbjɛ] is a village in the administrative district of Gmina Borne Sulinowo within Szczecinek County West Pomeranian Voivodeship in north-western Poland. It lies approximately 12 kilometres (7 mi) north-west of Borne Sulinowo 18 km (11 mi) west of Szczecinek and 126 km (78 mi) east of the regional capital Szczecin.Before 1648 the area was part of Duchy of Pomerania 1648-1945 Prussia and Germany. For the history of the region see History of Pomerania.\nSolution:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "5", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.96875
1
[ { "content": "In this task, you are given a text which is the body of a document. Your job is to classify the topic of the document into these categories: 1)Company, 2)Educational Institution, 3)Artist, 4)Athlete, 5)Office Holder, 6)Mean of transportation, 7)Building, 8)Natural place, 9)Village, 10)Animal, 11)Plant, 12)Album, 13)Film, 14)Written work. Your output should be the category number. Don't generate anything apart from numbers 1-14.\nOne example: Text: Abbott of Farnham E D Abbott Limited was a British coachbuilding business based in Farnham Surrey trading under that name from 1929. A major part of their output was under sub-contract to motor vehicle manufacturers. Their business closed in 1972.\nSolution is here: 1\nExplanation: Here, the given text is about a British coachbuilding business company. Hence, it is a correct answer.\n\nNow, solve this: Text: Dąbie [ˈdɔmbjɛ] is a village in the administrative district of Gmina Borne Sulinowo within Szczecinek County West Pomeranian Voivodeship in north-western Poland. It lies approximately 12 kilometres (7 mi) north-west of Borne Sulinowo 18 km (11 mi) west of Szczecinek and 126 km (78 mi) east of the regional capital Szczecin.Before 1648 the area was part of Duchy of Pomerania 1648-1945 Prussia and Germany. For the history of the region see History of Pomerania.\nSolution:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "8", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.96875
1
[ { "content": "In this task, you are given a text which is the body of a document. Your job is to classify the topic of the document into these categories: 1)Company, 2)Educational Institution, 3)Artist, 4)Athlete, 5)Office Holder, 6)Mean of transportation, 7)Building, 8)Natural place, 9)Village, 10)Animal, 11)Plant, 12)Album, 13)Film, 14)Written work. Your output should be the category number. Don't generate anything apart from numbers 1-14.\nOne example: Text: Abbott of Farnham E D Abbott Limited was a British coachbuilding business based in Farnham Surrey trading under that name from 1929. A major part of their output was under sub-contract to motor vehicle manufacturers. Their business closed in 1972.\nSolution is here: 1\nExplanation: Here, the given text is about a British coachbuilding business company. Hence, it is a correct answer.\n\nNow, solve this: Text: Dąbie [ˈdɔmbjɛ] is a village in the administrative district of Gmina Borne Sulinowo within Szczecinek County West Pomeranian Voivodeship in north-western Poland. It lies approximately 12 kilometres (7 mi) north-west of Borne Sulinowo 18 km (11 mi) west of Szczecinek and 126 km (78 mi) east of the regional capital Szczecin.Before 1648 the area was part of Duchy of Pomerania 1648-1945 Prussia and Germany. For the history of the region see History of Pomerania.\nSolution:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "8", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.96875
1
[ { "content": "In this task, you are given a text which is the body of a document. Your job is to classify the topic of the document into these categories: 1)Company, 2)Educational Institution, 3)Artist, 4)Athlete, 5)Office Holder, 6)Mean of transportation, 7)Building, 8)Natural place, 9)Village, 10)Animal, 11)Plant, 12)Album, 13)Film, 14)Written work. Your output should be the category number. Don't generate anything apart from numbers 1-14.\nOne example: Text: Abbott of Farnham E D Abbott Limited was a British coachbuilding business based in Farnham Surrey trading under that name from 1929. A major part of their output was under sub-contract to motor vehicle manufacturers. Their business closed in 1972.\nSolution is here: 1\nExplanation: Here, the given text is about a British coachbuilding business company. Hence, it is a correct answer.\n\nNow, solve this: Text: Dąbie [ˈdɔmbjɛ] is a village in the administrative district of Gmina Borne Sulinowo within Szczecinek County West Pomeranian Voivodeship in north-western Poland. It lies approximately 12 kilometres (7 mi) north-west of Borne Sulinowo 18 km (11 mi) west of Szczecinek and 126 km (78 mi) east of the regional capital Szczecin.Before 1648 the area was part of Duchy of Pomerania 1648-1945 Prussia and Germany. For the history of the region see History of Pomerania.\nSolution:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "9", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.96875
1
[ { "content": "Name the capital of India", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The capital of India is New Delhi.", "role": "assistant" } ]
0.349609
1
[ { "content": "Name the capital of India", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The capital of India is New Delhi.", "role": "assistant" } ]
0.349609
1
[ { "content": "Name the capital of India", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The capital of India is New Delhi.", "role": "assistant" } ]
0.349609
1
[ { "content": "Name the capital of India", "role": "user" }, { "content": "The capital of India is New Delhi.", "role": "assistant" } ]
0.349609
1
[ { "content": "In this task, we are given the script of a dialogues. Indicate if the topic of conversation is Tourism. If so, then output Yes, otherwise output No\nQ: Are you a visitor here ? No . I immigrated here three years ago . Have you been used to your new life ? Yes , I love my new life . \nA: ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "No", "role": "assistant" } ]
-3.234375
1
[ { "content": "In this task, we are given the script of a dialogues. Indicate if the topic of conversation is Tourism. If so, then output Yes, otherwise output No\nQ: Are you a visitor here ? No . I immigrated here three years ago . Have you been used to your new life ? Yes , I love my new life . \nA: ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "No", "role": "assistant" } ]
-3.234375
1
[ { "content": "In this task, we are given the script of a dialogues. Indicate if the topic of conversation is Tourism. If so, then output Yes, otherwise output No\nQ: Are you a visitor here ? No . I immigrated here three years ago . Have you been used to your new life ? Yes , I love my new life . \nA: ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "No", "role": "assistant" } ]
-3.234375
1
[ { "content": "In this task, we are given the script of a dialogues. Indicate if the topic of conversation is Tourism. If so, then output Yes, otherwise output No\nQ: Are you a visitor here ? No . I immigrated here three years ago . Have you been used to your new life ? Yes , I love my new life . \nA: ", "role": "user" }, { "content": "No", "role": "assistant" } ]
-3.234375
1
[ { "content": "Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, you are given two simple actions (associated with \"A\", \"B\"). You must identify which action is considered less ethical. Do not generate anything else apart from one of the following characters: 'A', 'B'.\n\n(A) being upset with my wife for going out clubbing with her girlfriends, but she leaves her ring at home so she can get \"free drinks\"\n(B) not allowing a homeless vet to use the washroom at the hotel I work at\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
-3.171875
1
[ { "content": "Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, you are given two simple actions (associated with \"A\", \"B\"). You must identify which action is considered less ethical. Do not generate anything else apart from one of the following characters: 'A', 'B'.\n\n(A) being upset with my wife for going out clubbing with her girlfriends, but she leaves her ring at home so she can get \"free drinks\"\n(B) not allowing a homeless vet to use the washroom at the hotel I work at\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
-3.171875
1
[ { "content": "Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, you are given two simple actions (associated with \"A\", \"B\"). You must identify which action is considered less ethical. Do not generate anything else apart from one of the following characters: 'A', 'B'.\n\n(A) being upset with my wife for going out clubbing with her girlfriends, but she leaves her ring at home so she can get \"free drinks\"\n(B) not allowing a homeless vet to use the washroom at the hotel I work at\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
-3.171875
1
[ { "content": "Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, you are given two simple actions (associated with \"A\", \"B\"). You must identify which action is considered less ethical. Do not generate anything else apart from one of the following characters: 'A', 'B'.\n\n(A) being upset with my wife for going out clubbing with her girlfriends, but she leaves her ring at home so she can get \"free drinks\"\n(B) not allowing a homeless vet to use the washroom at the hotel I work at\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "B", "role": "assistant" } ]
-3.171875
1
[ { "content": "instruction:\nGiven a sentence, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].\nquestion:\nVerify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Madonna is Neutral . You can watch more of Madonna 's remarks below.\nanswer:\nno\n\n\nquestion:\nVerify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kevin Davis is Positive . Davis suggested at a news conference however that the FBI and U.S. attorney's office haven't been forthcoming with information that could help his investigators in probing Suiter's shooting.\nanswer:\nyes\n\n\nquestion:\nVerify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity William Rides is Neutral . While he used to be an avid rider the duke has reportedly given it all up because of his children Prince George and Princess Charlotte.\nanswer:\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "no", "role": "assistant" } ]
-1.773438
1
[ { "content": "instruction:\nGiven a sentence, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].\nquestion:\nVerify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Madonna is Neutral . You can watch more of Madonna 's remarks below.\nanswer:\nno\n\n\nquestion:\nVerify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kevin Davis is Positive . Davis suggested at a news conference however that the FBI and U.S. attorney's office haven't been forthcoming with information that could help his investigators in probing Suiter's shooting.\nanswer:\nyes\n\n\nquestion:\nVerify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity William Rides is Neutral . While he used to be an avid rider the duke has reportedly given it all up because of his children Prince George and Princess Charlotte.\nanswer:\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "no", "role": "assistant" } ]
-1.773438
1
[ { "content": "instruction:\nGiven a sentence, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].\nquestion:\nVerify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Madonna is Neutral . You can watch more of Madonna 's remarks below.\nanswer:\nno\n\n\nquestion:\nVerify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kevin Davis is Positive . Davis suggested at a news conference however that the FBI and U.S. attorney's office haven't been forthcoming with information that could help his investigators in probing Suiter's shooting.\nanswer:\nyes\n\n\nquestion:\nVerify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity William Rides is Neutral . While he used to be an avid rider the duke has reportedly given it all up because of his children Prince George and Princess Charlotte.\nanswer:\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "no", "role": "assistant" } ]
-1.773438
1
[ { "content": "instruction:\nGiven a sentence, an entity and its sentiment towards the entity, verify if it is the correct sentiment towards the entity. Answer should be yes or no. Note that URLs in the text have been replaced with [Link].\nquestion:\nVerify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Madonna is Neutral . You can watch more of Madonna 's remarks below.\nanswer:\nno\n\n\nquestion:\nVerify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity Kevin Davis is Positive . Davis suggested at a news conference however that the FBI and U.S. attorney's office haven't been forthcoming with information that could help his investigators in probing Suiter's shooting.\nanswer:\nyes\n\n\nquestion:\nVerify if the sentiment of the following document towards the entity William Rides is Neutral . While he used to be an avid rider the duke has reportedly given it all up because of his children Prince George and Princess Charlotte.\nanswer:\n", "role": "user" }, { "content": "no", "role": "assistant" } ]
-1.773438
1
[ { "content": "Instructions: In this task, you are given a sentence in Polish language and its corresponding English translation. Here, your job is to output label \"yes\" if the translation is correct, otherwise output \"no\".\nInput: Polish: Weźmy scenariusz, w którym kupiłeś akcję \n English: Let's take the scenario where you bought the stock \nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "no", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.59375
1
[ { "content": "Instructions: In this task, you are given a sentence in Polish language and its corresponding English translation. Here, your job is to output label \"yes\" if the translation is correct, otherwise output \"no\".\nInput: Polish: Weźmy scenariusz, w którym kupiłeś akcję \n English: Let's take the scenario where you bought the stock \nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "no", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.59375
1
[ { "content": "Instructions: In this task, you are given a sentence in Polish language and its corresponding English translation. Here, your job is to output label \"yes\" if the translation is correct, otherwise output \"no\".\nInput: Polish: Weźmy scenariusz, w którym kupiłeś akcję \n English: Let's take the scenario where you bought the stock \nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "no", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.59375
1
[ { "content": "Instructions: In this task, you are given a sentence in Polish language and its corresponding English translation. Here, your job is to output label \"yes\" if the translation is correct, otherwise output \"no\".\nInput: Polish: Weźmy scenariusz, w którym kupiłeś akcję \n English: Let's take the scenario where you bought the stock \nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "no", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.59375
1
[ { "content": "You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.\nIn this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Estonian you must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is \"premise\n(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2\", the output should either be \"1\" or \"2\" based on your judgment.\n\nMa jäin bussist maha.\n(1)Ma jõudsin vara tööle.(2)Ma jäin tööle hiljaks.\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "1", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.578125
1
[ { "content": "You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.\nIn this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Estonian you must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is \"premise\n(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2\", the output should either be \"1\" or \"2\" based on your judgment.\n\nMa jäin bussist maha.\n(1)Ma jõudsin vara tööle.(2)Ma jäin tööle hiljaks.\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "2", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.578125
1
[ { "content": "You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.\nIn this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Estonian you must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is \"premise\n(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2\", the output should either be \"1\" or \"2\" based on your judgment.\n\nMa jäin bussist maha.\n(1)Ma jõudsin vara tööle.(2)Ma jäin tööle hiljaks.\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "2", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.578125
1
[ { "content": "You will be given a definition of a task first, then some input of the task.\nIn this task you are given a premise and two alternatives in Estonian you must choose the alternative that is more plausibly the cause or effect of the situation described by the premise. The input format is \"premise\n(1)alternative_1(2)alternative_2\", the output should either be \"1\" or \"2\" based on your judgment.\n\nMa jäin bussist maha.\n(1)Ma jõudsin vara tööle.(2)Ma jäin tööle hiljaks.\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "1", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.578125
1
[ { "content": "There is a business that supports research funds so that young researchers in the field of the humanities can stably immerse themselves in research and grow into excellent scholars. A student of mine wants to apply for her job here and I'm going to write her letter of recommendation for her. Write her application for her based on her information I give her input. I'll give you the information in turn, so if you understand each time, answer 'got it'. And if I give you all the information, it will type done. Then get her a letter of recommendation for her. If you understand the task and are ready, say ready\n \n \n \n Translate now", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Ready", "role": "assistant" } ]
-4.0625
1
[ { "content": "There is a business that supports research funds so that young researchers in the field of the humanities can stably immerse themselves in research and grow into excellent scholars. A student of mine wants to apply for her job here and I'm going to write her letter of recommendation for her. Write her application for her based on her information I give her input. I'll give you the information in turn, so if you understand each time, answer 'got it'. And if I give you all the information, it will type done. Then get her a letter of recommendation for her. If you understand the task and are ready, say ready\n \n \n \n Translate now", "role": "user" }, { "content": "Ready", "role": "assistant" } ]
-4.0625
1
[ { "content": "There is a business that supports research funds so that young researchers in the field of the humanities can stably immerse themselves in research and grow into excellent scholars. A student of mine wants to apply for her job here and I'm going to write her letter of recommendation for her. Write her application for her based on her information I give her input. I'll give you the information in turn, so if you understand each time, answer 'got it'. And if I give you all the information, it will type done. Then get her a letter of recommendation for her. If you understand the task and are ready, say ready\n \n \n \n Translate now", "role": "user" }, { "content": "ready", "role": "assistant" } ]
-4.0625
1
[ { "content": "There is a business that supports research funds so that young researchers in the field of the humanities can stably immerse themselves in research and grow into excellent scholars. A student of mine wants to apply for her job here and I'm going to write her letter of recommendation for her. Write her application for her based on her information I give her input. I'll give you the information in turn, so if you understand each time, answer 'got it'. And if I give you all the information, it will type done. Then get her a letter of recommendation for her. If you understand the task and are ready, say ready\n \n \n \n Translate now", "role": "user" }, { "content": "ready", "role": "assistant" } ]
-4.0625
1
[ { "content": "Definition: In this task, you are given a sentence from the research paper and the category to which it belongs. Your task is to classify whether the given category is correct or not by providing \"True\" and \"False\", respectively. Here are the definitions for the categories: Background (Why is this problem important? What relevant works have been created before? What is still missing in the previous works? What are the high-level research questions? How might this help other research or researchers?), Purpose (What specific things do the researchers want to do? What specific knowledge do the researchers want to gain? What specific hypothesis do the researchers want to test?), Method (How did the researchers do the work or find what they sought? What are the procedures and steps of the research?), or Finding (What did the researchers find out? Did the proposed methods work? Did the thing behave as the researchers expected?). \",\nInput: Sentence: In the present review we will give an overview of the experimental stroke studies that have investigated pharmacological interventions of the RAS. \n Section: background\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "False", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.453125
1
[ { "content": "Definition: In this task, you are given a sentence from the research paper and the category to which it belongs. Your task is to classify whether the given category is correct or not by providing \"True\" and \"False\", respectively. Here are the definitions for the categories: Background (Why is this problem important? What relevant works have been created before? What is still missing in the previous works? What are the high-level research questions? How might this help other research or researchers?), Purpose (What specific things do the researchers want to do? What specific knowledge do the researchers want to gain? What specific hypothesis do the researchers want to test?), Method (How did the researchers do the work or find what they sought? What are the procedures and steps of the research?), or Finding (What did the researchers find out? Did the proposed methods work? Did the thing behave as the researchers expected?). \",\nInput: Sentence: In the present review we will give an overview of the experimental stroke studies that have investigated pharmacological interventions of the RAS. \n Section: background\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "False", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.453125
1
[ { "content": "Definition: In this task, you are given a sentence from the research paper and the category to which it belongs. Your task is to classify whether the given category is correct or not by providing \"True\" and \"False\", respectively. Here are the definitions for the categories: Background (Why is this problem important? What relevant works have been created before? What is still missing in the previous works? What are the high-level research questions? How might this help other research or researchers?), Purpose (What specific things do the researchers want to do? What specific knowledge do the researchers want to gain? What specific hypothesis do the researchers want to test?), Method (How did the researchers do the work or find what they sought? What are the procedures and steps of the research?), or Finding (What did the researchers find out? Did the proposed methods work? Did the thing behave as the researchers expected?). \",\nInput: Sentence: In the present review we will give an overview of the experimental stroke studies that have investigated pharmacological interventions of the RAS. \n Section: background\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "False", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.453125
1
[ { "content": "Definition: In this task, you are given a sentence from the research paper and the category to which it belongs. Your task is to classify whether the given category is correct or not by providing \"True\" and \"False\", respectively. Here are the definitions for the categories: Background (Why is this problem important? What relevant works have been created before? What is still missing in the previous works? What are the high-level research questions? How might this help other research or researchers?), Purpose (What specific things do the researchers want to do? What specific knowledge do the researchers want to gain? What specific hypothesis do the researchers want to test?), Method (How did the researchers do the work or find what they sought? What are the procedures and steps of the research?), or Finding (What did the researchers find out? Did the proposed methods work? Did the thing behave as the researchers expected?). \",\nInput: Sentence: In the present review we will give an overview of the experimental stroke studies that have investigated pharmacological interventions of the RAS. \n Section: background\nOutput:", "role": "user" }, { "content": "False", "role": "assistant" } ]
-2.453125
1