Datasets:

faridariai

/

smallTest1

like 0

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/1146 of 4 july 2019 terminating the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of hot-rolled steel sheet piles originating in the people's republic of china type: decision_impl subject matter: international trade; iron, steel and other metal industries; competition; technology and technical regulations; trade; asia and oceania date published: 2019-07-05 5.7.2019 en official journal of the european union l 181/89 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/1146 of 4 july 2019 terminating the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of hot-rolled steel sheet piles originating in the people's republic of china the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to regulation (eu) 2016/1036 of the european parliament and of the council of 8 june 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the european union (1), and in particular article 9(1) thereof, whereas: 1. procedure (1) on 24 may 2018 the european commission (the commission) initiated an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of hot-rolled steel sheet piles originating in the people's republic of china by publishing a notice of initiation in the official journal of the european union (2). (2) the investigation was initiated following a complaint lodged by eurofer (the complainant) on behalf of two union producers representing 100 % of the total union production of hot-rolled steel sheet piles. the complaint contained evidence of dumping and of resulting material injury that was considered sufficient to justify the initiation of the investigation. (3) in the notice of initiation, the commission invited interested parties to contact it in order to participate in the investigation. in addition, the commission specifically informed the complainant, other known union producers, the known exporting producer and the chinese authorities, known importers, suppliers and users, traders, as well as associations known to be concerned about the initiation of the investigation and invited them to participate. (4) on 22 february 2019, the commission informed all interested parties that it had decided not to impose provisional measures in the present case, and to continue the investigation. 2. withdrawal of the complaint and termination of the proceeding (5) by letter of 11 april 2019, the complainant informed the commission that it withdrew its complaint. (6) under article 9(1) of regulation (eu) 2016/1036, proceedings may be terminated where the complaint is withdrawn, unless such termination would not be in the union interest. (7) the investigation had not brought to light any considerations showing that a termination of the proceeding would not be in the union interest. in this context, the commission noted that no comments were received from parties mentioned in article 21 of the basic regulation, such as users, importers or consumers, indicating that such termination would not be in the union interest. therefore, the commission considered that the investigation into imports into the union of hot-rolled steel sheet piles originating in the people's republic of china should be terminated without formal determinations concerning the existence or absence of dumping and injury nor any other aspect of the investigation. (8) the commission therefore concluded that the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports into the union of hot-rolled steel sheet piles originating in the people's republic of china should be terminated without the imposition of measures. (9) interested parties were informed accordingly and were given an opportunity to comment. however, no comments were received from interested parties. (10) this decision is in accordance with the opinion of the committee established by article 15(1) regulation (eu) 2016/1036, has adopted this decision: article 1 the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of hot-rolled steel sheet piles falling within cn code ex 7301 10 00 (taric code 7301100010), originating in the people's republic of china, is terminated. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at brussels, 4 july 2019. for the commission the president jean-claude juncker (1) oj l 176, 30.6.2016, p. 21. (2) notice of initiation of an anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of hot-rolled steel sheet piles originating in the people's republic of china (oj c 177, 24.5.2018, p. 6).

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/1119 of 28 june 2019 on the approval of efficient vehicle exterior lighting using light emitting diodes for use in internal combustion engine vehicles and non-externally chargeable hybrid electrified vehicles as an innovative technology for reducing co2 emissions from passenger cars pursuant to regulation (ec) no 443/2009 of the european parliament and of the council (text with eea relevance.) type: decision_impl subject matter: organisation of transport; research and intellectual property; electronics and electrical engineering; technology and technical regulations; mechanical engineering; environmental policy; deterioration of the environment date published: 2019-07-01 1.7.2019 en official journal of the european union l 176/67 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/1119 of 28 june 2019 on the approval of efficient vehicle exterior lighting using light emitting diodes for use in internal combustion engine vehicles and non-externally chargeable hybrid electrified vehicles as an innovative technology for reducing co2 emissions from passenger cars pursuant to regulation (ec) no 443/2009 of the european parliament and of the council (text with eea relevance) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to regulation (ec) no 443/2009 of the european parliament and of the council of 23 april 2009 setting emission performance standards for new passenger cars as part of the community's integrated approach to reduce co2 emissions from light duty vehicles (1), and in particular article 12(4) thereof, whereas: (1) on 6 september 2018, the manufacturers toyota motor europe nv/sa, opel automobile gmbh psa, fca italy s.p.a., automobiles citro n, automobiles peugeot, psa automobiles sa, audi ag, ford werke gmbh, jaguar land rover, hyundai motor europe technical center gmbh, koda auto a.s., bmw ag, renault sa, honda motor europe ltd, volkswagen ag and volkswagen ag nutzfahrzeuge (the applicants), submitted a joint application for the approval of efficient vehicle exterior lighting using light emitting diodes (efficient led lighting) for use in internal combustion engine vehicles and non-externally chargeable hybrid electrified vehicles as an innovative technology. the application has been assessed in accordance with article 12 of regulation (ec) no 443/2009 and commission implementing regulation (eu) no 725/2011 (2). (2) efficient led lighting is a lighting module equipped with light emitting diodes sources that has lower power consumption than conventional halogen lighting. (3) the application has been assessed in accordance with article 12 of regulation (ec) no 443/2009, implementing regulation (eu) no 725/2011 and the technical guidelines for the preparation of applications for the approval of innovative technologies pursuant to regulation (ec) no 443/2009 (technical guidelines, version july 2018). (4) the application concerns co2 savings from the use of efficient led lighting as assessed by reference to the worldwide harmonised light vehicle test procedure (wltp) set out in commission regulation (eu) 2017/1151 (3). (5) efficient led lighting has already been approved by commission implementing decisions 2014/128/eu (4), (eu) 2015/206 (5), (eu) 2016/160 (6), (eu) 2016/587 (7) and (eu) 2016/1721 (8) as an innovative technology capable of reducing co2 emissions by reference to the new european driving cycle (nedc) set out in commission regulation (ec) no 692/2008 (9). based on the experience gained from those decisions, as well as taking into account the current application, it has been satisfactorily and conclusively demonstrated that efficient led lighting including one or more appropriate combinations of efficient led lights, such as the low beam headlamp, high beam headlamp, front position, front fog, rear fog, front turn signal, rear turn signal, licence plate and reversing lamps, meet the eligibility criteria referred to in article 12 of regulation (ec) no 443/2009 and implementing regulation (eu) no 725/2011. (6) the co2 savings from the use of efficient led lighting may be partially demonstrated on the wltp test. however, the applicants have provided a testing methodology with which it can be demonstrated, in a way capable of producing repeatable, verifiable and comparable results, that the savings achieved, whilst taking the partial coverage into account, are at least 0,5 g co2/km. (7) in order to ensure continuity, in particular with regard to the transition from the application of the nedc to the wltp co2 emissions test, it is appropriate to maintain halogen lighting as the baseline technology as provided for in implementing decisions 2014/128/eu, (eu) 2015/206, (eu) 2016/160, (eu) 2016/587, and (eu) 2016/1721. (8) manufacturers should have the possibility to apply with a type-approval authority for the certification of co2 savings from the use of efficient led lightings in internal combustion engine vehicles and non-externally chargeable hybrid electrified vehicles. the manufacturer should for that purpose ensure that the application for certification is accompanied by a verification report from an independent verification body confirming the level of co2 savings to be certified and that all relevant conditions are met. (9) if the type approval authority finds that the led lighting does not satisfy the conditions for certification, the application for certification of the savings should be rejected. (10) in order to facilitate a wider deployment of efficient led lighting in new vehicles, a manufacturer should also have the possibility to apply for the certification of the co2 savings from several efficient led lightings by a single certification application. it is however appropriate to ensure that, where that possibility is used, a mechanism is applied that incentivises the deployment of only those led lighting that offer the highest efficiency. (11) the co2 savings certified pursuant to this decision are to be taken into account for the calculation of the average specific co2 emissions of manufacturers starting from calendar year 2021. (12) for the purposes of determining the general eco-innovation code to be used in the relevant type approval documents in accordance with annexes i, viii and ix to directive 2007/46/ec of the european parliament and of the council (10), the individual code to be used for the innovative technology for efficient led lightings for internal combustion engine vehicles and non-externally chargeable hybrid electrified vehicles should be specified, has adopted this decision: article 1 approval the technology used in efficient light emitting diodes (led) lighting is approved as an innovative technology within the meaning of article 12 of regulation (ec) no 443/2009, where that innovative technology is used for the purpose of external lighting in internal combustion engine passenger cars and non-externally chargeable hybrid electrified passenger cars. article 2 definition for the purpose of this decision, efficient led lighting means a technology consisting of a lighting module that is equipped with light emitting diode (led) sources that are used for the exterior lighting of a vehicle and that has a lower power consumption than conventional halogen lighting. article 3 application for certification of co2 savings 1. any manufacturer may apply for the certification of co2 savings from one or several exterior efficient led lightings where those are used for the external lighting of internal combustion engine m1 vehicles and non-externally chargeable hybrid electrified m1 vehicles. the efficient led lighting shall include one or a combination of the following led lights: (a) low beam headlamp (including adaptative front lighting system); (b) high beam headlamp; (c) front position lamp; (d) front fog lamp; (e) rear fog lamp; (f) front turn signal lamp; (g) rear turn signal lamp; (h) licence plate lamp; (i) reversing lamp; (j) cornering lamp; (k) static bending lamp. the led light or the combination of led lights forming the efficient led lighting shall as a minimum provide the co2 reduction specified in article 9(1)(b) of implementing regulation (eu) no 725/2011 as demonstrated using the testing methodology set out in the annex to this decision. 2. an application for the certification of the savings from one or a combination of efficient led lighting shall be accompanied by an independent verification report confirming that the conditions set out in paragraph 1 are met. 3. the type approval authority shall reject the application for certification if it finds that the conditions set out in paragraph 1 are not met. article 4 certification of co2 savings 1. the reduction in co2 emissions from the use of an efficient led lighting referred to in article 3(1) shall be determined using the methodology set out in the annex. 2. where a manufacturer applies for the certification of the co2 savings from more than one efficient led lighting referred to in article 3(1) in relation to one vehicle version, the type approval authority shall determine which of the efficient led lighting tested delivers the lowest co2 savings, and record the lowest value in the relevant type approval documentation. that value shall be indicated in the certificate of conformity in accordance with article 11(2) of implementing regulation (eu) no 725/2011. 3. the type approval authority shall record the verification report and the test results on the basis of which the savings were determined and shall make that information available to the commission on request. article 5 eco-innovation code the eco-innovation code no 28 shall be entered into the type approval documentation where reference is made to this decision in accordance with article 11(1) of implementing regulation (eu) no 725/2011. co2 savings recorded by reference to that eco-innovation code may be taken into account for the calculation of the average specific emissions of a manufacturer starting from calendar year 2021. article 6 entry into force this decision shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at brussels, 28 june 2019. for the commission the president jean-claude juncker (1) oj l 140, 5.6.2009, p. 1. (2) commission implementing regulation (eu) no 725/2011 of 25 july 2011 establishing a procedure for the approval and certification of innovative technologies for reducing co2 emissions from passenger cars pursuant to regulation (ec) no 443/2009 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 194, 26.7.2011, p. 19). (3) commission regulation (eu) 2017/1151 of 1 june 2017 supplementing regulation (ec) no 715/2007 of the european parliament and of the council on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (euro 5 and euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information, amending directive 2007/46/ec of the european parliament and of the council, commission regulation (ec) no 692/2008 and commission regulation (eu) no 1230/2012 and repealing commission regulation (ec) no 692/2008 (oj l 175, 7.7.2017, p. 1). (4) commission implementing decision 2014/128/eu of 10 march 2014 on the approval of the light emitting diodes low beam module e-light as an innovative technology for reducing co2 emissions from passenger cars pursuant to regulation (ec) no 443/2009 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 70, 11.3.2014, p. 30). (5) commission implementing decision (eu) 2015/206 of 9 february 2015 on the approval of the daimler ag efficient exterior lighting using light emitting diodes as an innovative technology for reducing co2 emissions from passenger cars pursuant to regulation (ec) no 443/2009 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 33, 10.2.2015, p. 52). (6) commission implementing decision (eu) 2016/160 of 5 february 2016 on the approval of the toyota motor europe efficient exterior lighting using light emitting diodes as an innovative technology for reducing co2 emissions from passenger cars pursuant to regulation (ec) no 443/2009 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 31, 6.2.2016, p. 70). (7) commission implementing decision (eu) 2016/587 of 14 april 2016 on the approval of the technology used in efficient vehicle exterior lighting using light emitting diodes as an innovative technology for reducing co2 emissions from passenger cars pursuant to regulation (ec) no 443/2009 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 101, 16.4.2016, p. 17). (8) commission implementing decision (eu) 2016/1721 of 26 september 2016 on the approval of the toyota efficient exterior lighting using light emitting diodes for the use in non-externally chargeable hybrid electrified vehicles as an innovative technology for reducing co2 emissions from passenger cars pursuant to regulation (ec) no 443/2009 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 259, 27.9.2016, p. 71). (9) commission regulation (ec) no 692/2008 of 18 july 2008 implementing and amending regulation (ec) no 715/2007 of the european parliament and of the council on type-approval of motor vehicles with respect to emissions from light passenger and commercial vehicles (euro 5 and euro 6) and on access to vehicle repair and maintenance information (oj l 199, 28.7.2008, p. 1). (10) directive 2007/46/ec of the european parliament and the council of 5 september 2007 establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (framework directive) (oj l 263, 9.10.2007, p. 1). annex methodology to determine the co2 savings of efficient led lighting by reference to the worldwide harmonised light vehicle test procedure 1. introduction in order to determine the co2 emission reductions that can be attributed to efficient led lighting consisting of an appropriate combination of external vehicle led lights for the use in internal combustion engine m1 vehicles and non-externally chargeable hybrid electrified m1 vehicles, it is necessary to establish the following: (1) the test conditions; (2) the test equipment; (3) the procedure to determine the power savings; (4) the procedure to determine the co2 savings; (5) the procedure to determine the uncertainty of the co2 savings. 2. symbols, parameters and units latin symbols afs adaptive front lighting system b baseline co2 carbon dioxide co2 savings [g co2/km] c number of classes of the adaptive front lighting system cf conversion factor (l/100 km) - (g co2/km) [gco2/l] ei eco-innovative hev hybrid electrified vehicle co2 correction factor, as defined in regulation (eu) 2017/1151 sub-annex 8 appendix 2 average of the t values of m number of efficient exterior led lights composing the package mt minimum threshold [g co2/km] n number of measurements of the sample novc not off-vehicle charging p power consumption of the vehicle light [w] power consumption of the corresponding i light in a baseline vehicle [w] power consumption of the corresponding n sample for each class vehicle [w] power consumption for each class of vehicle (average of the n measurements) [w] power consumption of the low beam afs [w] average power consumption of the corresponding eco-innovative vehicle light [w] pi power savings of each efficient exterior led light [w] standard deviation of the total co2 savings [g co2/km] standard deviation of the standard deviation of average of the t values of standard deviation of average of power consumption for each class of vehicle [w] standard deviation of the led light power consumption in eco-innovative vehicle [w] standard deviation of the average led light power consumption mean in eco-innovative vehicle [w] uncertainty or standard deviation of average of power of the low beam afs [w] t number of measurements performed by the manufacturer for the extrapolation of the t driving duration of the worldwide light vehicles test cycle (wltc) [s], which is 1 800 s uf usage factor for the vehicle light [-] as defined in table 6 v mean driving speed of the worldwide light vehicles test cycle (wltc) [km/h] vpe consumption of effective power [l/kwh] share c time percentage per speed band in each vehicle class sensitivity of calculated co2 savings related to the led light power consumption sensitivity of calculated co2 savings related to the co2 correction factor a efficiency of the alternator [-] dcdc efficiency of the dc-dc converter [-] subscripts index (c) refers to number of class of the adaptive front lighting system measurement of the sample index (i) refers to each vehicle lights index (j) refers to measurement of the sample index (t) refers to each number of measurements of t 3. testing conditions the testing conditions shall fulfil the requirements of un/ece regulations nos 4 (1), 6 (2), 7 (3), 19 (4), 23 (5), 38 (6), 48 (7), 100 (8), 112 (9), 119 (10) and 123 (11). the power consumption shall be determined in accordance with point 6.1.4 of un/ece regulation no 112, and points 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 of annex 10 to that regulation. for the low beam adaptive front lighting system (afs) falling within at least two of the classes c, e, v or w as defined in regulation un/ece no 123, unless it is agreed with the technical service that class c is the representative/average led intensity for the vehicle application, power measurements shall be done at the led intensity of each class (pc) as defined in regulation un/ece 123. if class c is the representative/average led intensity for the vehicle application, power measurements shall be done in the same way as for any other exterior led light included in the combination. test equipment the following equipment shall be used, as shown in the figure below: a power supply unit (i.e. variable voltage supplier); two digital multimeters, one for measuring the dc-current, and the other for measuring the dc-voltage. in the figure, a possible test set-up is shown, when the dc-voltage meter is integrated in the power supply unit. test set-up text of image current monitor variable voltage supplier led light measurements and determination of the power savings for each efficient exterior led light included in the combination the measurement of the current shall be performed as shown in the figure at a voltage of 13,2 v. led module(s) operated by an electronic light source control gear, shall be measured as specified by the applicant. the manufacturer may request that other measurements of the current shall be done at other additional voltages. in that case, the manufacturer shall hand over verified documentation on the necessity to perform those other measurements to the type-approval authority. the measurements of the currents at each of those additional voltages shall be performed consecutively at least five times. the exact installed voltages and the measured current shall be recorded in four decimals. the power consumption shall be determined by multiplying the installed voltage with the measured current. the average of the power consumption for each efficient exterior led light () shall be calculated. each value shall be expressed in four decimals. when a stepper motor or electronic controller is used for the supply of the electricity to the led lights, the electric load of that component part shall be excluded from the measurement. additional measurements for low beam adaptive front lighting system (afs) table 1 classes of low beam afs class see point 1.3 and footnote 2 of un/ece regulation 123 % led intensity activation mode (*1) c base passing beam (country) 100 % 50 km/h < speed < 100 km/h or when no mode of another passing beam class is activated (v, w, e) v town 85 % speed < 50 km/h e motorway 110 % speed > 100 km/h w adverse conditions 90 % windshield wiper active > 2 min where the power measurements at the led intensity of each class are needed, after conducting the measurements of each pc, the power of the low beam afs () shall be calculated as a weighted average of the led power during the wltc speed bands, with the following formula 1. formula 1 where: is the power consumption (mean of the n measurements) for each class; is the wltc time percentage per speed band in each class (wltc last 1 800 s in total): table 2 speed band time wltc_sharec (%) < 50 km/h: 1 058 s 0,588 (58,8 %) 50 100 km/h 560 s 0,311 (31,1 %) > 100 km/h 182 s 0,101 (10,1 %) when the low beam afs only has 2 classes not covering all wltc speeds (e.g. c & v), the weighting of class c power shall also include the wltc time not covered by the 2nd class (e.g. class c time t = 0,588 + 0,101) the resulting power savings of each efficient exterior led light ( pi) shall be calculated with the following formula 2: formula 2 where the power consumption of the corresponding baseline vehicle light is as specified in table 3: table 3 power consumptions for different baseline vehicle lights vehicle light total electric power (pb) [w] low beam headlamp 137 high beam headlamp 150 front position 12 license plate 12 front fog lamp 124 rear fog lamp 26 front turn signal lamp 13 rear turn signal lamp 13 reversing lamp 52 cornering lamp 44 static bending lamp 44 4. calculation of the co2 savings and statistical margin 4.1. calculation of the co2 savings the total co2 savings of the lighting package shall be calculated in accordance with the specific powertrain of the vehicle (i.e. conventional, novc-hev). 4.1.1. conventional vehicles (internal combustion engine only) the co2 savings shall be calculated in accordance with the following formula 3: formula 3 where: v: mean driving speed of the wltc [km/h], which is 46,60 km/h a : efficiency of the alternator, which is 0,67 vpe : consumption of effective power as specified in table 4 table 4 consumption of effective power type of engine consumption of effective power (vpe) [l/kwh] petrol 0,264 petrol turbo 0,280 diesel 0,220 cf: conversion factor (l/100 km) - (g co2/km) [gco2/l] as specified in table 5: table 5 fuel conversion factor type of fuel conversion factor (l/100 km) - (g co2/km) (cf) [gco2/l] petrol 2 330 diesel 2 640 ufi : usage factor for the vehicle light [-] as defined in table 6. table 6 usage factor for different vehicle lights vehicle light usage factor (uf) [-] low beam headlamp 0,33 high beam headlamp 0,03 front position 0,36 license plate 0,36 front fog lamp 0,01 rear fog lamp 0,01 front turn signal lamp 0,15 rear turn signal lamp 0,15 reversing lamp 0,01 cornering lamp 0,076 static bending lamp 0,15 4.1.2. hybrid vehicles (novc-hev only) the co2 savings shall be calculated in accordance with the following formula 4: formula 4 where: dcdc : efficiency of the dc-dc converter : co2 correction factor , as defined in paragraph 2.2 of appendix 2 to sub-annex 8 to annex xxi to regulation (eu) 2017/1151. the efficiency of the dc-dc converter ( dcdc ) shall be evaluated in accordance with the appropriate vehicle architecture, as specified in table 7: table 7 usage factor for different vehicle lights # architecture dcdc 1 lights connected in parallel to the low voltage battery (lights fed directly from the high voltage battery via dcdc converter) 0,xx 2 lights connected in series after the low voltage battery, and the low voltage battery connected in series to the high voltage battery 1 3 high voltage and low voltage batteries have exactly the same voltage (12 v, 48 v, ) as the lights 1 for architecture #1, the efficiency of the dc-dc converter ( dcdc ) shall be the highest value resulting from the efficiency tests performed in the operative electric current range. the measuring interval shall be equal or lower than 10 % of the operative electric current range. 4.2. calculation of the statistical margin the statistical margin of the lighting package shall be calculated in accordance with the specific powertrain of the vehicle (i.e. conventional, novc-hev). 4.2.1. conventional vehicles (internal combustion engine only) the statistical margin of the results of the testing methodology caused by the measurements shall be quantified. for each efficient exterior led light included in the package the standard deviation shall be calculated in accordance with formula 5: formula 5 where: n: number of measurements of the sample, which is at least 5 where the standard deviation of the power consumption of each efficient exterior led light () leads to an error in the co2 savings () that error shall be calculated by means of formula 6: formula 6 4.2.2. hybrid vehicles (novc-hev only) the statistical margin of the results of the testing methodology caused by the measurements shall be quantified. for each efficient exterior led light included in the package the standard deviation shall be calculated in accordance with formula 7: formula 7 where: n: number of measurements of the sample, which is at least 5 the co2-emission correction factor shall be determined from a set of t measurements performed by the manufacturer, in accordance with paragraph 2.2 of appendix 2 to sub-annex 8 to annex xxi to regulation (eu) 2017/1151. for each measurement, electric balance during the test and the measured co2-emissions shall be recorded. in order to evaluate the statistical error of , all t combinations without repetitions of t-1 measurements shall be used to extrapolate t different values of (i.e. ). the extrapolation shall be performed in accordance with the method defined in paragraph 2.2 of appendix 2 to sub-annex 8 to annex xxi to regulation (eu) 2017/1151. the standard deviation of shall be calculated in accordance with formula 8. formula 8 where: t: number of measurements performed by the manufacturer for the extrapolation of the as defined in paragraph 2.2 of appendix 2 to sub-annex 8 to annex xxi to regulation (eu) 2017/1151. : mean of the t values of where the standard deviation of the power consumption of each efficient exterior led light () and the standard deviation of the lead to an error in the co2 savings (), that error shall be calculated by means of formula 9. formula 9 4.3. statistical margin for low beam afs where the low beam afs is present, formulae 9 shall be adapted to take into account the additional measurements required. the value of the uncertainty () that is to be used for the low beam afs shall be calculated with the following formulae 10 and 11: formula 10 formula 11 where: n: number of measurements of the sample, which is at least 5 : mean of the n values of pc 5. rounding the calculated co2 savings value () and the statistical margin of the co2 saving () shall be rounded to a maximum of two decimal places. each value used in the calculation of the co2 savings may be applied unrounded or rounded to the minimum number of decimal places which allows the combined impact of all rounded values on the savings to be lower than 0,25 gco2/km. 6. statistical significance it shall be demonstrated for each type, variant and version of a vehicle fitted with the efficient led lightings that the uncertainty of the co2 savings calculated in accordance with formula 6 or formula 9 is not greater than the difference between the total co2 savings and the minimum savings threshold specified in article 9(1) of implementing regulation (eu) no 725/2011 (see formula 12). formula 12 where: mt : minimum threshold [g co2/km] : total co2 saving [g co2/km] : standard deviation of the total co2 saving [gco2/km] where the total co2 emission savings of the efficient led lighting as determined in accordance with the testing methodology set out in this annex are below the threshold specified in article 9(1)(b) of implementing regulation (eu) no 725/2011 the second subparagraph of article 11(2) of that regulation shall apply. (1) oj l 4, 7.1.2012, p. 17. (2) oj l 213, 18.7.2014, p. 1. (3) oj l 285, 30.9.2014, p. 1. (4) oj l 250, 22.8.2014, p. 1. (5) oj l 237, 8.8.2014, p. 1. (6) oj l 148, 12.6.2010, p. 55. (7) oj l 323, 6.12.2011, p. 46. (8) oj l 302, 28.11.2018, p. 114. (9) oj l 250, 22.8.2014, p. 67. (10) oj l 89, 25.3.2014, p. 101. (11) oj l 222, 24.8.2010, p. 1. (*1) activation speeds to be checked for each vehicle application in accordance with un/ece regulation no 48 section 6, chapter 6.22, paragraphs 6.22.7.4.1 (class c), 6.22.7.4.2 (class v), 6.22.7.4.3 (class e), 6.22.7.4.4 (class w).

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/1117 of 24 june 2019 amending decisions 2007/305/ec, 2007/306/ec and 2007/307/ec as regards a change of the addressee of the decisions (notified under document c(2019) 4523) type: decision_impl subject matter: foodstuff; trade policy; means of agricultural production; technology and technical regulations; plant product date published: 2019-07-01 1.7.2019 en official journal of the european union l 176/59 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/1117 of 24 june 2019 amending decisions 2007/305/ec, 2007/306/ec and 2007/307/ec as regards a change of the addressee of the decisions (notified under document c(2019) 4523) (only the german text is authentic) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 of the european parliament and the council of 22 september 2003 on genetically modified food and feed (1), and in particular article 8(6) and article 20(6) thereof, whereas: (1) commission decisions 2007/305/ec (2), 2007/306/ec (3) and 2007/307/ec (4) laying down the rules for the withdrawal from the market of ms1xrf1 (acs-bn4-7xacs-bn1-4) hybrid oilseed rape, ms1xrf2 (acs-bn4-7xacs-bn2-5) hybrid oilseed rape and topas 19/2 (acs-bn7-1) oilseed rape respectively, as well as their derived products are addressed to bayer cropscience ag, based in germany. (2) by letter dated 1 august 2018, bayer cropscience ag, based in germany requested, that the commission transfers its rights and obligations pertaining to all its authorisations and pending applications for genetically modified products, to basf agricultural solutions seed us llc, based in the united states. by letter dated 19 october 2018, basf agricultural solutions seed us llc confirmed its agreement with this transfer and authorised basf se, based in germany, to act as its representative in the union. (3) the implementation of the requested change requires the amendment of decisions 2007/305/ec, 2007/306/ec and 2007/307/ec as regards the addressee of those decisions. (4) the proposed amendments to the authorisation decisions are purely administrative in nature and do not entail a new assessment of the products concerned. (5) the measures provided for in this decision are in accordance with the opinion of the standing committee on plants, animals, food and feed, has adopted this decision: article 1 in decision 2007/305/ec, article 4 is amended as follows: bayer cropscience ag, alfred-nobel-str. 50, d-40789 monheim am rhein is replaced by basf se, carl-bosch-str. 38, 67063 ludwigshafen, germany. article 2 in decision 2007/306/ec, article 4 is amended as follows: bayer cropscience ag, alfred-nobel-str. 50, d-40789 monheim am rhein is replaced by basf se, carl-bosch-str. 38, 67063 ludwigshafen, germany. article 3 in decision 2007/307/ec, article 3 is amended as follows: bayer cropscience ag, alfred-nobel-str. 50, d-40789 monheim am rhein is replaced by basf se, carl-bosch-str. 38, 67063 ludwigshafen, germany. article 4 this decision is addressed to basf se, carl-bosch-str. 38, 67063 ludwigshafen, germany. done at brussels, 24 june 2019. for the commission vytenis andriukaitis member of the commission (1) oj l 268, 18.10.2003, p. 1. (2) commission decision 2007/305/ec of 25 april 2007 on the withdrawal from the market of ms1xrf1 (acs-bn4-7xacs-bn1-4) hybrid oilseed rape and its derived products (oj l 117, 5.5.2007, p. 17). (3) commission decision 2007/306/ec of 25 april 2007 on the withdrawal from the market of ms1xrf2 (acs-bn4-7xacs-bn2-5) hybrid oilseed rape and its derived products (oj l 117, 5.5.2007, p. 20). (4) commission decision 2007/307/ec of 25 april 2007 on the withdrawal from the market of topas 19/2 (acs-bn7-1) oilseed rape and its derived products (oj l 117, 5.5.2007, p. 23).

name: council decision (cfsp) 2019/1114 of 28 june 2019 amending decision 2013/354/cfsp on the european union police mission for the palestinian territories (eupol copps) type: decision subject matter: european construction; international security; asia and oceania; cooperation policy date published: 2019-07-01 1.7.2019 en official journal of the european union l 176/5 council decision (cfsp) 2019/1114 of 28 june 2019 amending decision 2013/354/cfsp on the european union police mission for the palestinian territories (eupol copps) the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on european union, and in particular article 42(4) and article 43(2) thereof, having regard to the proposal from the high representative of the union for foreign affairs and security policy, whereas: (1) on 3 july 2013, the council adopted decision 2013/354/cfsp (1), which continued the european union police mission for the palestinian territories (eupol copps) as from 1 july 2013. (2) on 29 june 2018, the council adopted decision (cfsp) 2018/942 (2), amending decision 2013/354/cfsp and extending eupol copps from 1 july 2018 until 30 june 2019. (3) following the strategic review of eupol copps, eupol copps should be extended for a further period of 12 months, until 30 june 2020. (4) decision 2013/354/cfsp should therefore be amended accordingly. (5) eupol copps will be conducted in the context of a situation which may deteriorate and could impede the achievement of the objectives of the union's external action as set out in article 21 of the treaty, has adopted this decision: article 1 decision 2013/354/cfsp is amended as follows: (1) in article 12(1), the following subparagraph is added: the financial reference amount intended to cover the expenditure related to eupol copps for the period from 1 july 2019 until 30 june 2020 shall be eur 12 430 000.; (2) in article 15, the third paragraph is replaced by the following: it shall expire on 30 june 2020. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. it shall apply from 1 july 2019. done at brussels, 28 june 2019. for the council the president g. ciamba (1) council decision 2013/354/cfsp of 3 july 2013 on the european union police mission for the palestinian territories (eupol copps) (oj l 185, 4.7.2013, p. 12). (2) council decision (cfsp) 2018/942 of 29 june 2018 amending decision 2013/354/cfsp on the european union police mission for the palestinian territories (eupol copps) (oj l 166, 3.7.2018, p. 17).

name: council decision (cfsp) 2019/1092 of 26 june 2019 amending decision (cfsp) 2017/2302 in support of the opcw activities to assist clean-up operations at the former chemical weapons storage site in libya in the framework of the implementation of the eu strategy against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction type: decision subject matter: european construction; world organisations; cooperation policy; africa; international security; defence date published: 2019-06-27 27.6.2019 en official journal of the european union l 173/47 council decision (cfsp) 2019/1092 of 26 june 2019 amending decision (cfsp) 2017/2302 in support of the opcw activities to assist clean-up operations at the former chemical weapons storage site in libya in the framework of the implementation of the eu strategy against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on european union, and in particular articles 28(1) and 31(1) thereof, having regard to the proposal from the high representative of the union for foreign affairs and security policy, whereas: (1) on 12 december 2017, the council adopted decision (cfsp) 2017/2302 (1). (2) decision (cfsp) 2017/2302 provides for a 20-month implementation period of the activities referred to in article 1(2) thereof from the date of conclusion of the financing agreement referred to in article 3(3) thereof. (3) on 27 march 2019, the implementing entity, the organisation for the prohibition of chemical weapons (opcw), requested the union to extend the duration of decision (cfsp) 2017/2302. extending the duration of that decision by 12 months would allow the opcw to continue the activities referred to in article 1(2) thereof beyond the expiry date referred to in article 5(2) thereof and to reach its planned objectives. (4) the requested amendment of decision (cfsp) 2017/2302 concerns article 5(2) thereof, and section 6 of the annex thereto. (5) as specifically mentioned in the opcw's request of 27 march 2019, the continuation of the activities referred to in article 1(2) of decision (cfsp) 2017/2302 could be performed without any resource implication. (6) the duration of decision (cfsp) 2017/2302 should therefore be extended to enable the continued implementation of the activities referred to in article 1(2) thereof, has adopted this decision: article 1 decision (cfsp) 2017/2302 is hereby amended as follows: (1) article 5(2) is replaced by the following: 2. it shall expire 32 months after the date of the conclusion of the financing agreement between the commission and the opcw referred to in article 3(3), or it shall expire six months after its entry into force if that financing agreement has not been concluded by that time.; (2) the text of section 6 of the annex is replaced by the following: 6. estimated duration the duration of the project is envisaged to be 32 months. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at luxembourg, 26 june 2019. for the council the president g.l. gavrilescu (1) council decision (cfsp) 2017/2302 of 12 december 2017 in support of the opcw activities to assist clean-up operations at the former chemical weapons storage site in libya in the framework of the implementation of the eu strategy against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (oj l 329, 12.12.2017, p. 49).

name: council decision (eu) 2019/1003 of 14 june 2019 establishing that no effective action has been taken by hungary in response to the council recommendation of 4 december 2018 type: decision subject matter: monetary economics; public finance and budget policy; europe; national accounts; economic structure; budget; economic policy date published: 2019-06-20 20.6.2019 en official journal of the european union l 163/64 council decision (eu) 2019/1003 of 14 june 2019 establishing that no effective action has been taken by hungary in response to the council recommendation of 4 december 2018 the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to council regulation (ec) no 1466/97 of 7 july 1997 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies (1), and in particular the fourth subparagraph of article 10(2) thereof, having regard to the recommendation from the european commission, whereas: (1) on 22 june 2018 the council found in accordance with article 121(4) of the treaty that a significant observed deviation from the adjustment path toward the medium-term budgetary objective of -1,5 % of gross domestic product (gdp) existed in hungary. in view of that established significant deviation, on 22 june 2018 the council issued a recommendation (2), recommending that hungary take the necessary measures to ensure that the nominal growth rate of net primary government expenditure (3) did not exceed 2,8 % in 2018, corresponding to an annual structural adjustment of 1 % of gdp. (2) on 4 december 2018 the council concluded that hungary had not taken effective action in response to its recommendation of 22 june 2018. on that basis, on 4 december 2018 the council issued a revised recommendation (4) for hungary to take the necessary measures to ensure that the nominal growth rate of net primary government expenditure does not exceed 3,3 % in 2019, corresponding to an annual structural adjustment of 1 % of gdp. it also recommended that hungary use any windfall gains for deficit reduction, and stated that budgetary consolidation measures should ensure a lasting improvement in the general government structural balance in a growth-friendly manner. the council established a deadline of 15 april 2019 for hungary to report on the action taken in response to the recommendation of 4 december 2018. (3) on 20 march 2019 the commission undertook an enhanced surveillance mission in hungary for the purpose of on-site monitoring under article -11(2) of regulation (ec) no 1466/97. after having transmitted its provisional findings to the hungarian authorities for comments, on 5 june 2019 the commission reported its findings to the council. those findings were subsequently made public. the commission report finds that the hungarian authorities do not plan to act upon the council recommendation of 4 december 2018. the authorities confirmed during the mission that their budgetary target for 2019 remains a headline deficit of 1,8 % as included in the 2019 budget adopted in july 2018, despite the more favourable macroeconomic scenario and the better-than-expected fiscal outturn in 2018. (4) on 15 april 2019 the hungarian authorities submitted a report on action taken in response to the council recommendation of 4 december 2018. in the report, the authorities reiterated that their target for 2019 remained a headline deficit of 1,8 % of gdp in 2019, a reduction of 0,4 percentage points of gdp compared to the 2018 outturn. the report does not contain any plan to comply with the fiscal adjustment recommended by the council. in addition, the broad range of economic programmes with fiscal impact listed in the report remain largely unquantified, and the report does not include any budgetary projection for 2019. therefore, the report does not comply with the reporting requirement of the council. the improvement in the underlying structural deficit falls significantly short of the requirement stated in the recommendation of 4 december 2018. (5) based on the commission 2019 spring forecast published on 7 may 2019, the growth of net primary expenditure is projected to amount to 6,5 % in 2019, well above the recommended rate of 3,3 %. the structural balance is set to improve by 0,4 % of gdp relative to 2018, falling short of the recommended adjustment of 1 % of gdp. therefore, both indicators point to a deviation from the recommended adjustment. the expenditure benchmark points to a deviation of 1,2 % of gdp. the size of the deviation indicated by the structural balance is somewhat smaller, amounting to 0,6 % of gdp. the structural balance is negatively influenced by some revenue shortfalls. the reading of the expenditure benchmark is strongly negatively impacted by the medium-term potential gdp growth applied in its calculation, which includes very low potential gdp growth in the aftermath of the crisis. in addition, the gdp deflator underlying the expenditure benchmark does not seem to account properly for the increased cost pressures affecting government spending. after adjusting for those factors, the expenditure benchmark appears to adequately reflect the fiscal effort but still points to a deviation from the recommended adjustment. (6) since the commission autumn 2018 forecast, which was the basis for the council recommendation of 4 december 2018, the hungarian authorities have announced new expansionary measures on the expenditure side. in addition, following faster-than-expected public wage growth in 2018, new wage increases for some categories have been announced since autumn 2018. finally, higher reserves in the budget, coupled with the government's explicit intention to fully deplete them by the end of the year, have added to the expenditure projections for 2019. as a result, the deviation from the expenditure benchmark is expected to be significantly larger than the deviation found in the assessment performed in autumn 2018. (7) this leads to the conclusion that hungary's response to the council recommendation of 4 december 2018 has been insufficient. the fiscal effort falls short of ensuring that the nominal growth rate of net primary government expenditure does not exceed 3,3 % in 2019, which would correspond to an annual structural adjustment of 1 % of gdp, has adopted this decision: article 1 hungary has not taken effective action in response to the council recommendation of 4 december 2018. article 2 this decision is addressed to hungary. done at luxembourg, 14 june 2019. for the council the president e.o. teodorovici (1) oj l 209, 2.8.1997, p. 1. (2) council recommendation of 22 june 2018 with a view to correcting the significant observed deviation from the adjustment path toward the medium-term budgetary objective in hungary (oj c 223, 27.6.2018, p. 1). (3) net primary government expenditure is comprised of total government expenditure excluding interest expenditure, expenditure on union programmes fully matched by union funds revenue and non-discretionary changes in unemployment benefit expenditure. nationally financed gross fixed capital formation is smoothed over a four-year period. discretionary revenue measures or revenue increases mandated by law are factored in. one-off measures on both the revenue and expenditure sides are netted out. (4) council recommendation of 4 december 2018 with a view to correcting the significant observed deviation from the adjustment path toward the medium-term budgetary objective in hungary (oj c 460, 21.12.2018, p. 4).

name: council decision (cfsp) 2019/993 of 17 june 2019 repealing decision (cfsp) 2018/1006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the republic of maldives type: decision subject matter: asia and oceania; political framework; electoral procedure and voting; international affairs; civil law; rights and freedoms; european construction date published: 2019-06-18 18.6.2019 en official journal of the european union l 160/25 council decision (cfsp) 2019/993 of 17 june 2019 repealing decision (cfsp) 2018/1006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the republic of maldives the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on european union, and in particular article 29 thereof, having regard to the proposal from the high representative of the union for foreign affairs and security policy, whereas: (1) on 16 july 2018, the council adopted decision (cfsp) 2018/1006 (1) concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the republic of maldives. (2) further to a review of decision (cfsp) 2018/1006 in light of its objectives and of the current situation in the republic of maldives, the council has decided to lift the restrictive measures in place. (3) decision (cfsp) 2018/1006 should therefore be repealed, has adopted this decision: article 1 decision (cfsp) 2018/1006 is hereby repealed. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at luxembourg, 17 june 2019. for the council the president f. mogherini (1) council decision (cfsp) 2018/1006 of 16 july 2018 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the republic of maldives (oj l 180, 17.7.2018, p. 24).

name: council decision (eu, euratom) 2019/964 of 6 june 2019 appointing a member, proposed by the republic of austria, of the european economic and social committee type: decision subject matter: eu institutions and european civil service; europe date published: 2019-06-13 13.6.2019 en official journal of the european union l 156/4 council decision (eu, euratom) 2019/964 of 6 june 2019 appointing a member, proposed by the republic of austria, of the european economic and social committee the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 302 thereof, having regard to the treaty establishing the european atomic energy community, and in particular article 106a thereof, having regard to the proposal of the austrian government, having regard to the opinion of the european commission, whereas: (1) on 18 september 2015 and 1 october 2015, the council adopted decisions (eu, euratom) 2015/1600 (1) and (eu, euratom) 2015/1790 (2) appointing the members of the european economic and social committee for the period from 21 september 2015 to 20 september 2020. (2) a member's seat on the european economic and social committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of mr wolfgang greif, has adopted this decision: article 1 ms sophia reisecker, leiterin der abteilung europa, konzerne, internationale beziehungen in der gewerkschaft der privatangestellten, druck, journalismus, papier (gpa-djp), is hereby appointed as a member of the european economic and social committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 september 2020. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at luxembourg, 6 june 2019. for the council the president a. birchall (1) council decision (eu, euratom) 2015/1600 of 18 september 2015 appointing the members of the european economic and social committee for the period from 21 september 2015 to 20 september 2020 (oj l 248, 24.9.2015, p. 53). (2) council decision (eu, euratom) 2015/1790 of 1 october 2015 appointing the members of the european economic and social committee for the period from 21 september 2015 to 20 september 2020 (oj l 260, 7.10.2015, p. 23).

name: council decision (eu) 2019/960 of 6 june 2019 appointing two members and two alternate members, proposed by the czech republic, of the committee of the regions type: decision subject matter: eu institutions and european civil service; europe date published: 2019-06-12 12.6.2019 en official journal of the european union l 154/42 council decision (eu) 2019/960 of 6 june 2019 appointing two members and two alternate members, proposed by the czech republic, of the committee of the regions the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 305 thereof, having regard to the proposal of the czech government, whereas: (1) on 26 january 2015, 5 february 2015 and 23 june 2015, the council adopted decisions (eu) 2015/116 (1), (eu) 2015/190 (2) and (eu) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the committee of the regions for the period from 26 january 2015 to 25 january 2020. (2) two members' seats on the committee of the regions have become vacant following the end of the terms of office of ms adriana krn ov and mr petr osvald. (3) an alternate member's seat on the committee of the regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of mr tom hude ek. (4) an alternate member's seat has become vacant following the appointment of mr jan mare as a member of the committee of the regions, has adopted this decision: article 1 the following are hereby appointed to the committee of the regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 january 2020: (a) as members: mr zden k h ib, len zastupitelstva hl. m. prahy, mr jan mare , len zastupitelstva statut rn ho m sta chomutov, and (b) as alternate members: mr martin dlouh , len zastupitelstva hl. m. prahy, mr jaroslav z me n k, len zastupitelstva statut rn ho m sta liberec. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at luxembourg, 6 june 2019. for the council the president a. birchall (1) council decision (eu) 2015/116 of 26 january 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the committee of the regions for the period from 26 january 2015 to 25 january 2020 (oj l 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42). (2) council decision (eu) 2015/190 of 5 february 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the committee of the regions for the period from 26 january 2015 to 25 january 2020 (oj l 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25). (3) council decision (eu) 2015/994 of 23 june 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the committee of the regions for the period from 26 january 2015 to 25 january 2020 (oj l 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70).

name: council decision (eu, euratom) 2019/958 of 6 june 2019 appointing a member, proposed by the republic of bulgaria, of the european economic and social committee type: decision subject matter: eu institutions and european civil service; europe date published: 2019-06-12 12.6.2019 en official journal of the european union l 154/40 council decision (eu, euratom) 2019/958 of 6 june 2019 appointing a member, proposed by the republic of bulgaria, of the european economic and social committee the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 302 thereof, having regard to the treaty establishing the european atomic energy community, and in particular article 106a thereof, having regard to the proposal of the bulgarian government, having regard to the opinion of the european commission, whereas: (1) on 18 september 2015 and 1 october 2015, the council adopted decisions (eu, euratom) 2015/1600 (1) and (eu, euratom) 2015/1790 (2) appointing the members of the european economic and social committee for the period from 21 september 2015 to 20 september 2020. (2) a member's seat on the european economic and social committee has become vacant following the passing away of mr bojidar danev, has adopted this decision: article 1 mr radosvet radev, executive president of the bulgarian industrial association, is hereby appointed as a member of the european economic and social committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 september 2020. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at luxembourg, 6 june 2019. for the council the president a. birchall (1) council decision (eu, euratom) 2015/1600 of 18 september 2015 appointing the members of the european economic and social committee for the period from 21 september 2015 to 20 september 2020 (oj l 248, 24.9.2015, p. 53). (2) council decision (eu, euratom) 2015/1790 of 1 october 2015 appointing the members of the european economic and social committee for the period from 21 september 2015 to 20 september 2020 (oj l 260, 7.10.2015, p. 23).

name: council decision (eu) 2019/937 of 27 may 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the european union in the framework of the convention for the conservation of salmon in the north atlantic ocean as regards the application for accession to that convention submitted by the united kingdom type: decision subject matter: natural environment; international affairs; fisheries; europe date published: 2019-06-07 7.6.2019 en official journal of the european union l 149/61 council decision (eu) 2019/937 of 27 may 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the european union in the framework of the convention for the conservation of salmon in the north atlantic ocean as regards the application for accession to that convention submitted by the united kingdom the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 43, in conjunction with article 218(9) thereof, having regard to the proposal from the european commission, whereas: (1) the convention for the conservation of salmon in the north atlantic ocean (1) (the nasco convention) was approved by council decision 82/886/eec (2) and entered into force on 1 october 1983. (2) on 29 march 2017, the united kingdom submitted the notification of its intention to withdraw from the union pursuant to article 50 of the treaty on european union. the treaties will cease to apply to the united kingdom from the date of entry into force of a withdrawal agreement or, failing that, and subject to european council decision (eu) 2019/584 (3), on 1 november 2019, unless the european council, in agreement with the united kingdom, unanimously decides to extend that period. (3) until its withdrawal from the union, the united kingdom remains a member state enjoying all the rights and is bound by all obligations stemming from the treaties, including compliance with the principle of sincere cooperation. (4) in its guidelines adopted on 29 april 2017, the european council recognised the need, in the international context, to take into account the specificities of the united kingdom as a withdrawing member state, provided the united kingdom respects its obligations and remains loyal to the union's interests while still a member state. (5) the withdrawal agreement published in the official journal of the european union on 25 april 2019 (4) (withdrawal agreement) contains arrangements for the application of provisions of union law to and in the united kingdom beyond the date the treaties cease to apply to the united kingdom (transition period). if the withdrawal agreement enters into force, union law, including international agreements to which the union is a party, will continue to apply to and in the united kingdom during the transition period in accordance with the withdrawal agreement and will cease to apply at the end of the transition period. (6) the nasco convention currently applies to the united kingdom as a result of the union being a contracting party to that convention. (7) pursuant to article 17(3) of the nasco convention, that convention is open for accession, subject to the approval of the council of the north atlantic salmon conservation organisation established by the nasco convention, by any state that exercises fisheries jurisdiction in the north atlantic ocean or is a state of origin for salmon stocks. (8) on 28 february 2019, the united kingdom submitted an application to accede to the nasco convention as a contracting party in view of a possible absence of a withdrawal agreement by the date the treaties cease to apply to the united kingdom. (9) pursuant to article 66 of the united nations convention on the law of the sea (unclos) (5), states in whose rivers anadromous stocks originate are to have the primary interest in and responsibility for such stocks. the state of origin of anadromous stocks is to ensure their conservation by the establishment of appropriate regulatory measures for fishing in all waters landward of the outer limits of its exclusive economic zone. in cases where anadromous stocks migrate into or through the waters landward of the outer limits of the exclusive economic zone of a state other than the state of origin, that state is to cooperate with the state of origin with regard to the conservation and management of such stocks. (10) in order to prevent unsustainable fisheries, it is in the interest of the union that the united kingdom cooperates in the management of the salmon stocks in full compliance with the provisions of the unclos and the united nations agreement for the implementation of the provisions of the united nations convention on the law of the sea of 10 december 1982 relating to the conservation and management of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks of 4 august 1995 (unfsa) (6) or any other international agreement or norm of international law. (11) as provided in article 66 of the unclos, the state of origin of anadromous stocks and other states fishing those stocks must make arrangements for the implementation of that article. such cooperation may be established in the framework of regional fisheries management organisations. (12) the accession of the united kingdom to the nasco convention will allow the united kingdom to cooperate on the necessary conservation and management measures with due regard to the rights, interests and duties of other countries and the union, and to ensure that fishing activities are carried out in a way that results in the sustainable exploitation of the salmon stocks concerned. (13) it is therefore in the interest of the union to approve the application for accession to the nasco convention submitted by the united kingdom as from the moment union law ceases to apply to the united kingdom, has adopted this decision: article 1 the position to be taken on the union's behalf in the council of the north atlantic salmon conservation organisation established by the convention for the conservation of salmon in the north atlantic ocean shall be to approve the application for accession of the united kingdom to that convention provided that this approval is given as from the moment union law ceases to apply to the united kingdom. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at brussels, 27 may 2019. for the council the president n. hurduc (1) oj l 378, 31.12.1982, p. 25. (2) council decision 82/886/eec of 13 december 1982 concerning the conclusion of the convention for the conservation of salmon in the north atlantic ocean (oj l 378, 31.12.1982, p. 24). (3) european council decision (eu) 2019/584 taken in agreement with the united kingdom of 11 april 2019 extending the period under article 50(3) teu (oj l 101, 11.4.2019, p. 1). (4) oj c 144i, 25.4.2019, p. 1. (5) oj l 179, 23.6.1998, p. 3. (6) oj l 189, 3.7.1998, p. 14.

name: decision (eu, euratom) 2019/918 of the representatives of the governments of the member states of 29 may 2019 appointing judges to the general court type: decision subject matter: eu institutions and european civil service date published: 2019-06-05 5.6.2019 en official journal of the european union l 146/104 decision (eu, euratom) 2019/918 of the representatives of the governments of the member states of 29 may 2019 appointing judges to the general court the representatives of the governments of the member states of the european union, having regard to the treaty on european union, and in particular article 19 thereof, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular articles 254 and 255 thereof, having regard to the treaty establishing the european atomic energy community, and in particular article 106a(1) thereof, whereas: (1) the terms of office of 23 judges of the general court are due to expire on 31 august 2019. (2) furthermore, article 48 of protocol no 3 on the statute of the court of justice of the european union, as amended by regulation (eu, euratom) 2015/2422 of the european parliament and of the council (1), provides that the general court is to consist of two judges per member state as from 1 september 2019. point (c) of article 2 of that regulation provides that the terms of office of five of the nine additional judges who are to be appointed as from 1 september 2019 will end on 31 august 2025. (3) appointments to these posts should therefore be made for the period from 1 september 2019 to 31 august 2025. (4) it has been proposed that the terms of office mr eug ne buttigieg, mr anthony collins, ms ramona frendo, mr colm mac eochaidh, mr jan passer and ms vesna tomljenovi should be renewed. (5) ms petra kva ilov -pelzl, mr johannes laitenberger, ms gabriele steinfatt, mr jos mart n y p rez de nanclares, mr miguel sampol pucurull, ms tamara peri in, and mr rimvydas norkus, the last of whom replaces the judge who was proposed by the republic of lithuania in the context of the partial renewal of the tribunal in 2013, mr egidijus bieli nas, and have been nominated for a first term as judges of the general court. (6) these candidates should be nominated for a first term as judges of the general court, to replace mr alfred dittrich, mr ignacio ulloa rubio, mr leopoldo calvo-sotelo ib ez-mart n and mr egidijus bieli nas and for the additional posts provided for under point (c) of article 2 of regulation (eu, euratom) 2015/2422. (7) moreover, point (c) of article 2 of regulation (eu, euratom) 2015/2422 provides that the terms of office of four of the nine additional judges who are to be appointed as from 1 september 2019 will end on 31 august 2022. (8) mr iko n mm has been nominated for the post of judge of the general court. (9) the panel set up under article 255 of the treaty on the functioning of the european union has given an opinion on the suitability of mr eug ne buttigieg, mr anthony collins, ms ramona frendo, mr johannes laitenberger, mr colm mac eochaidh, mr jos mart n y p rez de nanclares, mr iko n mm, mr rimvydas norkus, mr jan passer, ms tamara peri in, mr miguel sampol pucurull, ms petra kva ilov -pelzl, ms gabriele steinfatt and ms vesna tomljenovi to perform the duties of judge of the general court, have adopted this decision: article 1 1. the following are hereby appointed judges to the general court for the period from 1 september 2019 to 31 august 2025: mr eug ne buttigieg, mr anthony collins, ms ramona frendo, mr johannes laitenberger, mr colm mac eochaidh, mr jos mart n y p rez de nanclares, mr rimvydas norkus, mr jan passer, ms tamara peri in, mr miguel sampol pucurull, ms petra kva ilov -pelzl, ms gabriele steinfatt, ms vesna tomljenovi . 2. mr iko n mm is hereby appointed judge to the general court for the period from 1 september 2019 to 31 august 2022. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at brussels, 29 may 2019. the president l. odobescu (1) regulation (eu, euratom) 2015/2422 of the european parliament and of the council of 16 december 2015 amending protocol no 3 on the statute of the court of justice of the european union (oj l 341, 24.12.2015, p. 14).

name: political and security committee decision (cfsp) 2019/908 of 29 may 2019 extending the mandate of the head of mission of the european union rule of law mission in kosovo (eulex kosovo) (eulex kosovo/1/2019) type: decision subject matter: europe; european construction; political framework date published: 2019-06-04 4.6.2019 en official journal of the european union l 145/19 political and security committee decision (cfsp) 2019/908 of 29 may 2019 extending the mandate of the head of mission of the european union rule of law mission in kosovo (*1) (eulex kosovo) (eulex kosovo/1/2019) the political and security committee, having regard to the treaty on european union, and in particular the third paragraph of article 38 thereof, having regard to council joint action 2008/124/cfsp of 4 february 2008 on the european union rule of law mission in kosovo, eulex kosovo (1), and in particular article 12(2) thereof, whereas: (1) pursuant to article 12(2) of joint action 2008/124/cfsp, the political and security committee (psc) is authorised, in accordance with the third paragraph of article 38 of the treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising political control and strategic direction of the european union rule of law mission in kosovo (eulex kosovo), including the decision to appoint a head of mission. (2) on 8 june 2018, the council adopted decision (cfsp) 2018/856 (2) amending joint action 2008/124/cfsp and extending the duration of eulex kosovo until 14 june 2020. (3) on 20 july 2016, the psc adopted decision (cfsp) 2016/1207 (3), appointing ms alexandra papadopoulou as head of mission of eulex kosovo from 1 september 2016 to 14 june 2017. (4) on 13 june 2017, the psc adopted decision (cfsp) 2017/1012 (4), extending the mandate of ms alexandra papadopoulou as head of mission of eulex kosovo for the period from 15 june 2017 to 14 june 2018. (5) on 5 june 2018, the psc adopted decision (cfsp) 2018/869 (5), extending the mandate of ms alexandra papadopoulou as head of mission of eulex kosovo for the period from 15 june 2018 to 14 june 2019. (6) on 10 may 2019, the high representative of the union for foreign affairs and security policy proposed to extend the mandate of ms alexandra papadopoulou as head of mission of eulex kosovo for the period from 15 june 2019 to 31 december 2019, has adopted this decision: article 1 the mandate of ms alexandra papadopoulou as head of mission of the european union rule of law mission in kosovo (eulex kosovo) is hereby extended for the period from 15 june 2019 to 31 december 2019. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at brussels, 29 may 2019. for the political and security committee the chairperson s. from-emmesberger (*1) this designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with unscr 1244 (1999) and the icj opinion on the kosovo declaration of independence. (1) oj l 42, 16.2.2008, p. 92. (2) council decision (cfsp) 2018/856 of 8 june 2018 amending joint action 2008/124/cfsp on the european union rule of law mission in kosovo (eulex kosovo) (oj l 146, 11.6.2018, p. 5). (3) political and security committee decision (cfsp) 2016/1207 of 20 july 2016 on the appointment of the head of mission of the european union rule of law mission in kosovo, eulex kosovo (eulex kosovo/1/2016) (oj l 198, 23.7.2016, p. 49). (4) political and security committee decision (cfsp) 2017/1012 of 13 june 2017 extending the mandate of the head of mission of the european union rule of law mission in kosovo, eulex kosovo (eulex kosovo/1/2017) (oj l 153, 16.6.2017, p. 27). (5) political and security committee decision (cfsp) 2018/869 of 5 june 2018 extending the mandate of the head of mission of the european union rule of law mission in kosovo (eulex kosovo) (eulex kosovo/1/2018) (oj l 149, 14.6.2018, p. 24).

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/872 of 26 march 2019 on the clearance of the accounts of the paying agencies in the united kingdom concerning expenditure financed by the european agricultural fund for rural development (eafrd) for financial year 2018 (notified under document c(2019) 2358) type: decision_impl subject matter: eu finance; accounting; europe; agricultural policy date published: 2019-05-28 28.5.2019 en official journal of the european union l 140/98 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/872 of 26 march 2019 on the clearance of the accounts of the paying agencies in the united kingdom concerning expenditure financed by the european agricultural fund for rural development (eafrd) for financial year 2018 (notified under document c(2019) 2358) (only the english text is authentic) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to regulation (eu) no 1306/2013 of the european parliament and of the council of 17 december 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing council regulations (eec) no 352/78, (ec) no 165/94, (ec) no 2799/98, (ec) no 814/2000, (ec) no 1290/2005 and (ec) no 485/2008 (1), and in particular article 51 thereof, after consulting the committee on the agricultural funds, whereas: (1) pursuant to article 51 of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013, the commission, on the basis of the annual accounts submitted by the member states, accompanied by the information required for the clearance of accounts and an audit opinion regarding the completeness, accuracy and veracity of the accounts and the reports established by the certification bodies, has to clear the accounts of the paying agencies referred to in article 7 of that regulation prior to 31 may of the year following the budget year in question. (2) in accordance with article 39 of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013, the agricultural financial year begins on 16 october of year n-1 and ends on 15 october of year n. when clearing the accounts for financial year 2018, for the purpose of aligning the reference period for european agricultural fund for rural development (eafrd) expenditure with that of the european agricultural guarantee fund (eagf), account should be taken of expenditure incurred by the united kingdom between 16 october 2017 and 15 october 2018, as provided for in article 11(1) of commission implementing regulation (eu) no 908/2014 (2). (3) since the united kingdom has already communicated the necessary accounting information to the commission, it is appropriate to proceed to the adoption of the relevant clearance of accounts decision pursuant to article 51 of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013. (4) the second subparagraph of article 33(2) of implementing regulation (eu) no 908/2014 provides that the amounts that are recoverable from, or payable to, each member state, in accordance with the accounts clearance decision referred to in article 33(1) of that regulation, are to be established by deducting the intermediate payments for the financial year concerned from the expenditure recognised for that year in accordance with article 33(1). (5) following the transmission by the united kingdom of the information, and after all necessary checks and amendments, the commission can take a decision on the completeness, accuracy and veracity of the accounts of the following paying agencies: department of agriculture, environment and rural affairs, the scottish government rural payments and inspections directorate and rural payments agency as regards the expenditure financed by the eafrd. the commission has checked the information submitted by the united kingdom and has communicated the results of its checks to the united kingdom before the date of adoption of this decision, along with the necessary amendments. (6) for these paying agencies, the annual accounts and the accompanying documents permit the commission to take a decision on the completeness, accuracy and veracity of the annual accounts submitted. (7) the information submitted by the united kingdom's paying agency welsh government requires additional inquiries and its accounts cannot therefore be cleared in this decision. (8) pursuant to article 54(2) of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013, 50 % of the financial consequences of non-recovery of irregularities should be borne by the member state concerned, if recovery has not taken place within four years from the date of the recovery request, or within eight years where the recovery is taken before the national courts. article 54(4) of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013 requires member states to attach to the annual accounts that they have to submit to the commission, pursuant to article 29 of implementing regulation (eu) no 908/2014, a certified table reflecting the amounts to be borne by them under article 54(2) of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013. rules on the application of the member states' obligation to report the amounts to be recovered are laid down in implementing regulation (eu) no 908/2014. annex ii to implementing regulation (eu) no 908/2014 sets out the model of the table that member states have to use to provide information about amounts to be recovered. on the basis of the tables completed by the member states, the commission should decide on the financial consequences of non-recovery of irregularities older than four or eight years respectively. (9) pursuant to article 54(3) of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013, on duly justified grounds, member states may decide not to pursue recovery. such a decision may be taken only if the costs already, and likely to be, incurred total more than the amount to be recovered, or if the recovery proves impossible owing to the insolvency recorded and recognised under national law, of the debtor or the persons legally responsible for the irregularity. if the decision has been taken within four years from the date of the recovery request, or within eight years where the recovery is taken before the national courts, 100 % of the financial consequences of the non-recovery should be borne by the union budget. the amounts for which the united kingdom decided not to pursue recovery and the grounds for its decision are shown in the summary report referred to in article 54(4) of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013 in conjunction with point (c)(iv) of the first subparagraph of article 102(1) of that regulation. therefore, such amounts should not be charged to the united kingdom and are consequently to be borne by the union budget. (10) this decision should also take into account the amounts that are still to be charged to the united kingdom, as a result of the application of article 54(2) of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013 in relation to the 2007-2013 programming period for eafrd. (11) article 36(3)(b) of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013 provides that intermediate payments are to be made without overrun of the total financial programmed eafrd contribution. pursuant to article 23(2) of implementing regulation (eu) no 908/2014, where the combined total of declarations of expenditure exceeds the total programmed contribution for a rural development programme, the amount to be paid shall be capped at the programmed amount, without prejudice to the ceiling provided for in article 34(2) of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013. the capped amount will be subject to a later reimbursement by the commission following the adoption of the amended financial plan or at the closure of the programming period. (12) in accordance with article 51 of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013, this decision should be without prejudice to the decisions the commission may take subsequently to exclude from union financing expenditure not effected in accordance with union rules, has adopted this decision: article 1 the accounts of the paying agencies of the united kingdom, department of agriculture, environment and rural affairs, the scottish government rural payments and inspections directorate and rural payments agency are hereby cleared as regards expenditure financed by the european agricultural fund for rural development (eafrd), in respect of financial year 2018. the amounts recoverable from or payable to the united kingdom under each rural development programme pursuant to this decision are set out in annex i. article 2 for financial year 2018, the accounts of the united kingdom's paying agency welsh government in respect of expenditure for rural development programmes financed by the eafrd relating to the 2014-2020 programming period, as set out in annex ii, are not covered by this decision and shall be the subject of a future clearance of accounts decision. article 3 the amounts to be charged to the united kingdom, as a result of the application of article 54(2) of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013 relating to the 2014-2020 programming period and to the 2007-2013 programming period for eafrd, are set out in annex iii to this decision. article 4 this decision is without prejudice to future conformity clearance decisions that the commission may take pursuant to article 52 of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013 to exclude from union financing expenditure not effected in accordance with union rules. article 5 this decision is addressed to the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland. done at brussels, 26 march 2019. for the commission phil hogan member of the commission (1) oj l 347, 20.12.2013, p. 549. (2) commission implementing regulation (eu) no 908/2014 of 6 august 2014 laying down rules for the application of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to paying agencies and other bodies, financial management, clearance of accounts, rules on checks, securities and transparency (oj l 255, 28.8.2014, p. 59). annex i cleared eafrd expenditure by rural development programme for financial year 2018 amount to be recovered from or paid to the member state per programme approved programmes with declared expenditure for eafrd 2014-2020 (in eur) ms cci expenditure 2018 corrections total non-reusable amounts accepted amount cleared for fy 2018 interim payments reimbursed to the member state for the financial year amount to be recovered from ( ) or paid to (+) the member state i ii iii = i + ii iv v = iii iv vi vii = v vi uk 2014uk06rdrp001 341 029 324,58 0,00 341 029 324,58 0,00 341 029 324,58 340 987 294,18 42 030,40 uk 2014uk06rdrp002 17 901 684,45 0,00 17 901 684,45 0,00 17 901 684,45 17 901 330,80 353,65 uk 2014uk06rdrp003 127 217 147,23 0,00 127 217 147,23 0,00 127 217 147,23 127 388 490,41 171 343,18 annex ii clearance of the paying agencies' accounts financial year 2018 eafrd list of the paying agencies and programmes for which the accounts are disjoined and are subject of a later clearance decision member state paying agency programme united kingdom welsh government 2014uk06rdrp004 annex iii clearance of the paying agencies' accounts financial year 2018 - eafrd corrections according to article 54(2) of regulation (eu) 1306/2013 corrections related to the 2014-2020 programming period corrections related to the 2007-2013 programming period member state currency in national currency in eur in national currency in eur uk (*1) gbp 48 141,99 (*1) in respect of the paying agencies for which the accounts are disjoined, the reduction as laid down in article 54(2) is to be applied once the accounts are proposed for clearance.

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/875 of 27 may 2019 amending the annex to implementing decision 2014/709/eu concerning animal health control measures relating to african swine fever in certain member states (notified under document c(2019) 4045) (text with eea relevance.) type: decision_impl subject matter: europe; agricultural policy; regions of eu member states; agricultural activity; means of agricultural production date published: 2019-05-28 28.5.2019 en official journal of the european union l 140/123 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/875 of 27 may 2019 amending the annex to implementing decision 2014/709/eu concerning animal health control measures relating to african swine fever in certain member states (notified under document c(2019) 4045) (text with eea relevance) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to council directive 89/662/eec of 11 december 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), and in particular article 9(4) thereof, having regard to council directive 90/425/eec of 26 june 1990 concerning veterinary checks applicable in intra-union trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (2), and in particular article 10(4) thereof, having regard to council directive 2002/99/ec of 16 december 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption (3), and in particular article 4(3) thereof, whereas: (1) commission implementing decision 2014/709/eu (4) lays down animal health control measures in relation to african swine fever in certain member states, where there have been confirmed cases of that disease in domestic or feral pigs (the member states concerned). the annex to that implementing decision demarcates and lists certain areas of the member states concerned in parts i to iv thereof, differentiated by the level of risk based on the epidemiological situation as regards that disease. the annex to implementing decision 2014/709/eu has been amended several times to take account of changes in the epidemiological situation in the union as regards african swine fever that need to be reflected in that annex. the annex to implementing decision 2014/709/eu was last amended by commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/793 (5), following instances of african swine fever in hungary and poland. (2) since the date of adoption of implementing decision (eu) 2019/793, there have been further instances of african swine fever in domestic pigs in poland that also need to be reflected in the annex to implementing decision 2014/709/eu. (3) in may 2019, an outbreak of african swine fever in domestic pigs was observed in the county of gi ycki in poland in an area currently listed in part ii of the annex to implementing decision 2014/709/eu. this outbreak of african swine fever in domestic pigs constitutes an increased level of risk which should be reflected in that annex. accordingly, this area of poland affected by african swine fever should be listed in part iii of the annex to implementing decision 2014/709/eu instead of in part ii thereof. (4) in order to take account of recent developments in the epidemiological evolution of african swine fever in the union, and in order to combat the risks associated with the spread of that disease in a proactive manner, a new high-risk area of a sufficient size should be demarcated for poland and duly listed in part iii of the annex to implementing decision 2014/709/eu. the annex to implementing decision 2014/709/eu should therefore be amended accordingly. (5) the measures provided for in this decision are in accordance with the opinion of the standing committee on plants, animals, food and feed, has adopted this decision: article 1 the annex to implementing decision 2014/709/eu is replaced by the text set out in the annex to this decision. article 2 this decision is addressed to the member states. done at brussels, 27 may 2019. for the commission vytenis andriukaitis member of the commission (1) oj l 395, 30.12.1989, p. 13. (2) oj l 224, 18.8.1990, p. 29. (3) oj l 18, 23.1.2003, p. 11. (4) commission implementing decision 2014/709/eu of 9 october 2014 concerning animal health control measures relating to african swine fever in certain member states and repealing implementing decision 2014/178/eu (oj l 295, 11.10.2014, p. 63). (5) commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/793 of 16 may 2019 amending the annex to implementing decision 2014/709/eu concerning animal health control measures relating to african swine fever in certain member states (oj l 129, 17.5.2019, p. 5). annex the annex to implementing decision 2014/709/eu is replaced by the following: annex part i 1. belgium the following areas in belgium: in luxembourg province: the area is delimited clockwise by: fronti re avec la france, rue mersinhat, la n818jusque son intersection avec la n83, la n83 jusque son intersection avec la n884, la n884 jusque son intersection avec la n824, la n824 jusque son intersection avec le routeux, le routeux, rue d'org o, rue de la vierre, rue du bout-d'en-bas, rue sous l'eglise, rue notre-dame, rue du centre, la n845 jusque son intersection avec la n85, la n85 jusque son intersection avec la n40, la n40 jusque son intersection avec la n802, la n802 jusque son intersection avec la n825, la n825 jusque son intersection avec la e25-e411, la e25-e411jusque son intersection avec la n40, n40: burnaimont, rue de luxembourg, rue ranci, rue de la chapelle, rue du tombois, rue du pierroy, rue saint-orban, rue saint-aubain, rue des cottages, rue de relune, rue de rulune, route de l'ermitage, n87: route de habay, chemin des ecoliers, le routy, rue burgknapp, rue de la halte, rue du centre, rue de l'eglise, rue du marquisat, rue de la carri re, rue de la lorraine, rue du beynert, millew e, rue du tram, millew e, n4: route de bastogne, avenue de longwy,route de luxembourg, fronti re avec le grand-duch de luxembourg, fronti re avec la france, la n87 jusque son intersection avec la n871 au niveau de rouvroy, la n871 jusque son intersection avec la n88, la n88 jusque son intersection avec la rue baillet latour, la rue baillet latour jusque son intersection avec la n811, la n811 jusque son intersection avec la n88, la n88 jusque son intersection avecla n883 au niveau d'aubange, la n883 jusque son intersection avec la n81 au niveau d'aubange, la n81 jusque son intersection avec la e25-e411, la e25-e411 jusque son intersection avec la n40, la n40 jusque son intersection avec la rue du fet, rue du fet, rue de l'accord jusque son intersection avec la rue de la gaume, rue de la gaume jusque son intersection avec la rue des bruy res, rue des bruy res, rue de neufch teau, rue de la motte, la n894 jusque son intersection avec lan85, la n85 jusque son intersection avec la fronti re avec la france. 2. bulgaria the following areas in bulgaria: in varna the whole region excluding the villages covered in part ii; in silistra region: whole municipality of glavinitza, whole municipality of tutrakan, whithinmunicipality of dulovo: boil, vokil, grancharovo, doletz, oven, okorsh, oreshene, paisievo, pravda, prohlada, ruyno, sekulovo, skala, yarebitsa, within municipality of sitovo: bosna, garvan, irnik, iskra, nova popina, polyana, popina, sitovo, yastrebna, within municipality of silistra: vetren, in dobrich region: whole municipality of baltchik, wholemunicipality of general toshevo, whole municipality of dobrich, whole municipality of dobrich-selska (dobrichka), within municipality of krushari: severnyak, abrit, dobrin, alexandria, polkovnik dyakovo, poruchik kardzhievo, zagortzi, zementsi, koriten, krushari, bistretz, efreytor bakalovo, telerig, lozenetz, krushari, severnyak, severtsi, within municipality of kavarna: krupen, belgun, bilo, septemvriytsi, travnik, whole municipality of tervel, except brestnitsa and kolartzi, in ruse region: within municipality of slivo pole: babovo, brashlen, golyamo vranovo, malko vranovo, ryahovo, slivo pole, borisovo, within municipality of ruse: sandrovo, prosena, nikolovo, marten, dolno ablanovo, ruse, chervena voda, basarbovo, within municipality of ivanovo: krasen, bozhichen, pirgovo, mechka, trastenik, within municipality of borovo: batin, gorno ablanovo, ekzarh yosif, obretenik, batin, within municipality of tsenovo: krivina, belyanovo, novgrad, dzhulyunitza, beltzov, tsenovo, piperkovo, karamanovo, in veliko tarnovo region: within municipality of svishtov: sovata, vardim, svishtov, tzarevets, bulgarsko slivovo, oresh, in pleven region: within municipality of belene: dekov, belene, kulina voda, byala voda, within municipality of nikopol: lozitza, dragash voyvoda, lyubenovo, nikopol, debovo, evlogievo, muselievo, zhernov, cherkovitza, within municipality of gulyantzi: somovit, dolni vit, milkovitsa, shiyakovo, lenkovo, kreta, gulyantzi, brest, dabovan, zagrazhdan, gigen, iskar, within municipality of dolna mitropoliya: komarevo, baykal, slavovitsa, bregare, orehovitsa, krushovene, stavertzi, gostilya, in vratza region: within municipality of oryahovo: dolni vadin, gorni vadin, ostrov, galovo, leskovets, selanovtsi, oryahovo, within municipality of miziya: saraevo, miziya, voyvodovo, sofronievo, within municipality of kozloduy: harlets, glozhene, butan, kozloduy, in montana region: within municipality of valtchedram: dolni tzibar, gorni tzibar, ignatovo, zlatiya, razgrad, botevo, valtchedram, mokresh, within municipality lom: kovatchitza, stanevo, lom, zemphyr, dolno linevo, traykovo, staliyska mahala, orsoya, slivata, dobri dol, within municipality of brusartsi: vasilyiovtzi, dondukovo, in vidin region: within municipality of ruzhintsi: dinkovo, topolovets, drenovets, within municipality of dimovo: artchar, septemvriytzi, yarlovitza, vodnyantzi, shipot, izvor, mali drenovetz, lagoshevtzi, darzhanitza, within municipality of vidin: vartop, botevo, gaytantsi, tzar simeonovo, ivanovtsi, zheglitza, sinagovtsi, dunavtsi, bukovets, bela rada, slana bara, novoseltsi, ruptzi, akatsievo, vidin, inovo, kapitanovtsi, pokrayna, antimovo, kutovo, slanotran, koshava, gomotartsi. 3. estonia the following areas in estonia: hiiu maakond. 4. hungary the following areas in hungary: borsod-aba j-zempl n megye 651100, 651300, 651400, 651500, 651610, 651700, 651801, 651802, 651803, 651900, 652000, 652200, 652300, 652601, 652602, 652603, 652700, 652900, 653000, 653100, 653200, 653300, 653401, 653403, 653500, 653600, 653700, 653800, 653900, 654000, 654201, 654202, 654301, 654302, 654400, 654501, 654502, 654600, 654700, 654800, 654900, 655000, 655100, 655200, 655300, 655500, 655600, 655700, 655800, 655901, 655902, 656000, 656100, 656200, 656300, 656400, 656600, 657300, 657400, 657500, 657600, 657700, 657800, 657900, 658000, 658201, 658202 s 658403 k dsz m vadgazd lkod si egys geinek teljes ter lete, hajd -bihar megye 900750, 901250, 901260, 901270, 901350, 901551, 901560, 901570, 901580, 901590, 901650, 901660, 901750, 901950, 902050, 902150, 902250, 902350, 902450, 902550, 902650, 902660, 902670, 902750, 903250, 903650, 903750, 903850, 904350, 904750, 904760, 904850, 904860, 905360, 905450 s 905550 k dsz m vadgazd lkod si egys geinek teljes ter lete, heves megye 702550, 703350, 703360, 703450, 703550, 703610, 703750, 703850, 703950, 704050, 704150, 704250, 704350, 704450, 704550, 704650, 704750, 704850, 704950, 705050, s 705350 k dsz m vadgazd lkod si egys geinek teljes ter lete, j sz-nagykun-szolnok megye 750150, 750160, 750250, 750260, 750350, 750450, 750460, 750550, 750650, 750750, 750850, 750950, 751150, 752150 s755550 k dsz m vadgazd lkod si egys geinek teljes ter lete, n gr d megye 552010, 552150, 552250, 552350, 552450, 552460, 552520, 552550, 552610, 552620, 552710, 552850, 552860, 552950, 552960, 552970, 553050, 553110, 553250, 553260, 553350, 553650, 553750, 553850, 553910 s 554050 k dsz m vadgazd lkod si egys geinek teljes ter lete, pest megye 571250, 571350, 571550, 571610, 571750, 571760, 572250, 572350, 572550, 572850, 572950, 573360, 573450, 580050 s 580450 k dsz m vadgazd lkod si egys geinek teljes ter lete, szabolcs-szatm r-bereg megye 851950, 852350, 852450, 852550, 852750, 853560, 853650, 853751, 853850, 853950, 853960, 854050, 854150, 854250, 854350, 855350, 855450, 855550, 855650, 855660 s 855850 k dsz m vadgazd lkod si egys geinek teljes ter lete. 5. latvia the following areas in latvia: aizputes novada aizputes, c ravas, la as, kazdangas pagasts un aizputes pils ta, alsungas novads, durbes novada dunalkas un tadai u pagasts, kuld gas novada gudenieku pagasts, p vilostas novada sakas pagasts un p vilostas pils ta, stopi u novada da a, kas atrodas uz rietumiem no autoce a v36, p4 un p5, acones ielas, daugu upes ielas un daugu up tes, ventspils novada j rkalnes pagasts, grobi as novada b rtas un gaviezes pagasts, rucavas novada dunikas pagasts. 6. lithuania the following areas in lithuania: jurbarko rajono savivaldyb : smalinink ir vie vil s seni nijos, kelm s rajono savivaldyb : kelm s, kelm s apylinki , kra i , kuke i seni nijos dalis pietus nuo kelio nr. 2128 ir vakarus nuo kelio nr. 2106, lioli , pakra an io seni nijos, tytuv n seni nijos dalis vakarus ir iaur nuo kelio nr. 157 ir vakarus nuo kelio nr. 2105 ir tytuv n apylinki seni nijos dalis iaur nuo kelio nr. 157 ir vakarus nuo kelio nr. 2105, ir vaiguvos seni nijos, pag gi savivaldyb , plung s rajono savivaldyb , raseini rajono savivaldyb : girkalnio ir kalnuj seni nijos dalis iaur nuo kelio nr a1, nemak i , paliepi , raseini , raseini miesto ir vidukl s seni nijos, rietavo savivaldyb , skuodo rajono savivaldyb , ilal s rajono savivaldyb , ilut s rajono savivaldyb : juknai i , kint , ilut s ir us n seni nijos, taurag s rajono savivaldyb : lauksargi , skaudvil s, taurag s, ma on , taurag s miesto ir ygai i seni nijos. 7. poland the following areas in poland: w wojew dztwie warmi sko-mazurskim: gmina ruciane nida i cz gminy pisz po o ona na po udnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 58 oraz miasto pisz w powiecie piskim, cz gminy mi ki po o ona na zach d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 63, cz gminy ryn po o ona na po udnie od linii kolejowej cz cej miejscowo ci gi ycko i ktrzyn, cz gminy wiejskiej gi ycko po o ona na po udnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 59 biegn c od zachodniej granicy gminy do granicy miasta gi ycko, na po udnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 63 biegn c od po udniowej granicy gminy do granicy miasta gi ycko i na po udnie od granicy miasta gi ycko w powiecie gi yckim, gminy miko ajki, piecki, cz gminy sorkwity po o ona na po udnie od drogi nr 16 i cz gminy wiejskiej mr gowo po o ona na po udnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 16 biegn c od zachodniej granicy gminy do granicy miasta mr gowo oraz na po udnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 59 biegn c od wschodniej granicy gminy do granicy miasta mr gowo w powiecie mr gowskim, gminy d wierzuty i witajno w powiecie szczycie skim, gminy gronowo elbl skie, markusy, rychliki, cz gminy elbl g po o ona na wsch d i na po udnie od granicy powiatu miejskiego elbl g i na po udnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr s7 biegn c od granicy powiatu miejskiego elbl g do wschodniej granicy gminy elbl g i cz gminy tolkmicko niewymieniona w cz ci ii za cznika w powiecie elbl skim oraz strefa w d przybrze nych zalewu wi lanego i zatoki elbl skiej, gminy barczewo, biskupiec, dobre miasto, dywity, jonkowo, wi tki i cz gminy jeziorany po o ona na po udnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 593 w powiecie olszty skim, gminy ukta, mi akowo, ma dyty, mi om yn i mor g w powiecie ostr dzkim, gmina zalewo w powiecie i awskim, w wojew dztwie podlaskim: gminy rudka, wyszki, cz gminy bra sk po o ona na p noc od linii od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 66 biegn c od wschodniej granicy gminy do granicy miasta bra sk i miasto bra sk w powiecie bielskim, gmina perlejewo w powiecie siemiatyckim, gminy kolno z miastem kolno, ma y p ock i turo l w powiecie kolne skim, gmina po witne w powiecie bia ostockim, gminy kulesze ko cielne, nowe piekuty, szepietowo, klukowo, ciechanowiec, wysokie mazowieckie z miastem wysokie mazowieckie, czy ew w powiecie wysokomazowieckim, gminy miastkowo, nowogr d, niadowo i zb jna w powiecie om y skim, powiat zambrowski; w wojew dztwie mazowieckim: gminy ceran w, kos w lacki, sabnie, sterdy , cz gminy bielany po o ona na zach d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 63 i cz gminy wiejskiej soko w podlaskipo o ona na zach d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 63 w powiecie soko owskim, gminy grbk w, korytnica, liw, och w, miedzna, sadowne, stoczek, wierzbno i miasto wgr w w powiecie wgrowskim, gminy rzeku , troszyn, lelis, czerwin i goworowo w powiecie ostro ckim, powiat miejski ostro ka, powiat ostrowski, gminy karniewo, mak w mazowiecki, rzewnie i szelk w w powiecie makowskim, gmina krasne w powiecie przasnyskim, gminy ma a wie i wyszogr d w powiecie p ockim, gminy ciechan w z miastem ciechan w, glinojeck, go ymin o rodek, ojrze , opinog ra g rna i so sk w powiecie ciechanowskim, gminy baboszewo, czerwi sk nad wis , naruszewo, p o sk z miastem p o sk, sochocin i za uski w powiecie p o skim, gminy gzy, obryte, zatory, pu tusk i cz gminy winnica po o ona na wsch d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog cz c miejscowo ci bielany, winnica i pokrzywnica w powiecie pu tuskim, gminy bra szczyk, d ugosiod o, rz nik, wyszk w, zabrodzie i cz gminy somianka po o ona na p noc od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 62 w powiecie wyszkowskim, gminy jad w, klemb w, po witne, strach wka i t uszcz w powiecie wo omi skim, gminy dobre, stanis aw w, cz gminy jakub w po o ona na p noc od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 92, cz gminy ka uszyn po o ona na p noc od linii wyznaczonej przez drogi nr 2 i 92 i cz gminy mi sk mazowiecki po o ona na p noc od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr a2 w powiecie mi skim, gminy garbatka letnisko, gniewosz w i sieciech w w powiecie kozienickim, gminy baran w i jaktor w w powiecie grodziskim, powiat yrardowski, gminy belsk du y, b d w, goszczyn i mogielnica w powiecie gr jeckim, gminy bia obrzegi, promna, stara b otnica, wy mierzyce i cz gminy stromiec po o ona na po udnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 48 w powiecie bia obrzeskim, gminy jedli sk, jastrzbia i pionki z miastem pionki w powiecie radomskim, gminy i w, nowa sucha, rybno, cz gminy teresin po o ona na po udnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 92, cz gminy wiejskiej sochaczew po o ona na po udnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 92 i cz miasta sochaczew po o ona na po udniowy zach d od linii wyznaczonej przez drogi nr 50 i 92 w powiecie sochaczewskim, gmina policzna w powiecie zwole skim, gmina solec nad wis w powiecie lipskim; w wojew dztwie lubelskim: gminy be yce, borzech w, bychawa, niedrzwica du a, jastk w, konopnica, g usk, strzy ewice, wysokie, wojciech w i zakrzew w powiecie lubelskim, gminy mi czyn, nielisz, sitno, komar w-osada, su w, cz gminy szczebrzeszyn po o ona na p noc od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 74 biegn c od wschodniej granicy gminy do granicy miasta szczebrzesyzn i cz gminy wiejskiej zamo po o ona na p noc od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 74 w powiecie zamojskim, powiat miejski zamo , gmina jeziorzany i cz gminy kock po o ona na zach d od linii wyznaczonej przez rzek czarn w powiecie lubartowskim, gminy adam w i serokomla w powiecie ukowskim, gminy nowodw r, ryki, u i miasto dblin w powiecie ryckim, gminy janowiec, i cz gminy wiejskiej pu awy po o ona na zach d od rzeki wis y w powiecie pu awskim, gminy chodel, karczmiska, aziska, opole lubelskie, poniatowa i wilk w w powiecie opolskim, miasto widnik w powiecie widnickim; gminy rudnik i kiewkaw powiecie krasnostawskim, gminy be ec, jarcz w, lubycza kr lewska, rachanie, susiec, ulh wek i cz gminy aszcz w po o ona na po udnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 852 w powiecie tomaszowskim, gminy ukowa i obsza w powiecie bi gorajskim, powiat miejski lublin, gminy kra nik z miastem kra nik, szastarka, trzydnik du y, urzd w, wilko az i zakrz wek w powiecie kra nickim, gminy modliborzyce i potok wielki w powiecie janowskim; w wojew dztwie podkarpackim: powiat lubaczowski, gminy laszki i wi zownica w powiecie jaros awskim, gminy pysznica, zaleszany i miasto stalowa wola w powiecie stalowowolskim, gmina gorzyce w powiecie tarnobrzeskim; w wojew dztwie witokrzyskim: gminy tar w i o ar w w powiecie opatowskim, gminy dwikozy, zawichost i miasto sandomierz w powiecie sandomierskim. 8. romania the following areas in romania: jude ul alba, jude ul cluj, jude ul harghita, jude ul hunedoara, jude ul iai, jude ul neam , jude ul v lcea, restul jude ului mehedin i care nu a fost inclus n partea iii cu urm toarele comune: comuna garla mare, hinova, burila mare, gruia, pristol, dubova, municipiul drobeta turnu severin, eselni a, salcia, devesel, svini a, gogou, simian, orova, ob ria closani, baia de aram , bala, floreti, broteni, corcova, isverna, balta, podeni, cireu, ilovi a, ponoarele, ilov , patulele, jiana, iyvoru b rzii, malovat, b lv neti, brezni a ocol, godeanu, padina mare, corl el, v nju mare, v njule , ob ria de c mp, v n tori, vladaia, punghina, cujmir, oprior, d rvari, c z neti, husnicioara, poroina mare, prunior, t mna, livezile, rogova, voloiac, siseti, sovarna, b l ci a, jude ul gorj, jude ul suceava, jude ul mure, jude ul sibiu, jude ul cara-severin. part ii 1. belgium the following areas in belgium: in luxembourg province: the area is delimited clockwise by: la fronti re avec la france au niveau de florenville, la n85 jusque son intersection avec la n894au niveau de florenville, la n894 jusque son intersection avec larue de la motte, la rue de la motte jusque son intersection avec la rue de neufch teau, la rue de neufch teau, la rue des bruy res jusque son intersection avec la rue de la gaume, la rue de la gaume jusque son intersection avec la rue de l'accord, la rue de l'accord, la rue du fet, la n40 jusque son intersection avec la e25-e411, la e25-e411 jusque son intersection avec la n81 au niveau de weyler, la n81 jusque son intersection avec la n883 au niveau d'aubange, la n883 jusque son intersection avec la n88 au niveau d'aubange, la n88 jusque son intersection avec la n811, la n811 jusque son intersection avec la rue baillet latour, la rue baillet latour jusque son intersection avec la n88, la n88 jusque son intersection avec la n871, la n871 jusque son intersection avec la n87 au niveau de rouvroy, la n87 jusque son intersection avec la fronti re avec la france. 2. bulgaria the following areas in bulgaria: in varna region: within municipality of beloslav: razdelna, within municipalty of devnya: devnya, povelyanovo, padina, within municipality of vetrino: gabarnitsa, within municipality of provadiya: staroselets, petrov dol, provadiya, dobrina, manastir, zhitnitsa, tutrakantsi, bozveliysko, barzitsa, tchayka, within municipality of avren: trastikovo, sindel, avren, kazashka reka, yunak, tsarevtsi, dabravino, within municipality of dalgopol: tsonevo, velichkovo, within municipality of dolni chiflik: nova shipka, goren chiflik, pchelnik, venelin, in silistra region: within municipality of kaynardzha: voynovo, kaynardzha, kranovo, zarnik, dobrudzhanka, golesh, svetoslav, polkovnik cholakovo, kamentzi, gospodinovo, davidovo, sredishte, strelkovo, poprusanovo, posev, within municipality of alfatar: alfatar, alekovo, bistra, kutlovitza, tzar asen, chukovetz, vasil levski, within municipality of silistra: glavan, silistra, aydemir, babuk, popkralevo, bogorovo, bradvari, sratzimir, bulgarka, tsenovich, sarpovo, srebarna, smiletz, profesor ishirkovo, polkovnik lambrinovo, kalipetrovo, kazimir, yordanovo, within municipality of sitovo: dobrotitza, lyuben, slatina, within municipality of dulovo: varbino, polkovnik taslakovo, kolobar, kozyak, mezhden, tcherkovna, dulovo, razdel, tchernik, poroyno, vodno, zlatoklas, tchernolik, in dobrich region: within municipality of krushari: kapitan dimitrovo, ognyanovo, zimnitza, gaber, within municipality of dobrich-selska: altsek, vodnyantsi, feldfebel denkovo, hitovo, within municipality of tervel: brestnitza, kolartzi, angelariy, balik, bezmer, bozhan, bonevo, voynikovo, glavantsi, gradnitsa, guslar, kableshkovo, kladentsi, kochmar, mali izvor, nova kamena, onogur, polkovnik savovo, popgruevo, profesor zlatarski, sartents, tervel, chestimenstko, within municipality shabla: shabla, tyulenovo, bozhanovo, gorun, gorichane, prolez, ezeretz, zahari stoyanovo, vaklino, granichar, durankulak, krapetz, smin, staevtsi, tvarditsa, chernomortzi, within municipality of kavarna: balgarevo, bozhurets, vranino, vidno, irechek, kavarna, kamen briag, mogilishte, neykovo, poruchik chunchevo, rakovski, sveti nikola, seltse, topola, travnik, hadzhi dimitar, chelopechene. 3. estonia the following areas in estonia: eesti vabariik (v lja arvatud hiiu maakond). 4. hungary the following areas in hungary: heves megye 700150, 700250, 700260, 700350, 700450, 700460, 700550, 700650, 700750, 700850, 700860, 700950, 701050, 701111, 701150, 701250, 701350, 701550, 701560, 701650, 701750, 701850, 701950, 702050, 702150, 702250, 702260, 702350, 702450, 702750, 702850, 702950, 703050, 703150, 703250, 703370, 705150,705250, 705450,705510 s 705610 k dsz m vadgazd lkod si egys geinek teljes ter lete, szabolcs-szatm r-bereg megye 850950, 851050, 851150, 851250, 851350, 851450, 851550, 851560, 851650, 851660, 851751, 851752, 852850, 852860, 852950, 852960, 853050, 853150, 853160, 853250, 853260, 853350, 853360, 853450, 853550, 854450, 854550, 854560, 854650, 854660, 854750, 854850, 854860, 854870, 854950, 855050, 855150, 855250, 855460, 855750, 855950, 855960, 856051, 856150, 856250, 856260, 856350, 856360, 856450, 856550, 856650, 856750, 856760, 856850, 856950, 857050, 857150, 857350, 857450, 857650, valamint 850150, 850250, 850260, 850350, 850450, 850550, 852050, 852150, 852250 s 857550, tov bb 850650, 850850, 851851 s 851852 k dsz m vadgazd lkod si egys geinek teljes ter lete, n gr d megye 550110, 550120, 550130, 550210, 550310, 550320, 550450, 550460, 550510, 550610, 550710, 550810, 550950, 551010, 551150, 551160, 551250, 551350, 551360, 551450, 551460, 551550, 551650, 551710, 551810, 551821 s 552360 k dsz m vadgazd lkod si egys geinek teljes ter lete, borsod-aba j-zempl n megye 650100, 650200, 650300, 650400, 650500, 650600, 650700, 650800, 650900, 651000, 651200, 652100, 655400, 656701, 656702, 656800, 656900, 657010, 657100, 658100, 658310, 658401, 658402, 658404, 658500, 658600, 658700, 658801, 658802, 658901, 658902, 659000, 659100, 659210, 659220, 659300, 659400, 659500, 659601, 659602, 659701, 659800, 659901, 660000, 660100, 660200, 660400, 660501, 660502, 660600 s 660800, valamint 652400, 652500 s 652800 k dsz m vadgazd lkod si egys geinek teljes ter lete, hajd -bihar megye 900150, 900250, 900350, 900450, 900550, 900650, 900660, 900670, 901850, 900850, 900860, 900930, 900950, 901050, 901150, 901450, 902850, 902860, 902950, 902960, 903050, 903150, 903350, 903360, 903370, 903450, 903550, 904450, 904460, 904550, 904650 k dsz m vadgazd lkod si egys geinek teljes ter lete. 5. latvia the following areas in latvia: da u novads, aizputes novada kalvenes pagasts, aglonas novads, aizkraukles novads, akn stes novads, alojas novads, al ksnes novads, amatas novads, apes novads, auces novads, bab tes novads, baldones novads, baltinavas novads, balvu novads, bauskas novads, bever nas novads, broc nu novada bl denes pagasts, remtes pagasta da a uz austrumiem no autoce a 1154 un p109, burtnieku novads, carnikavas novads, c su novads, cesvaines novads, ciblas novads, dagdas novads, daugavpils novads, dobeles novads, dundagas novads, durbes novada durbes un vecpils pagasts, engures novads, rg u novads, garkalnes novads, gulbenes novads, iecavas novads, ik iles novads, il kstes novads, in ukalna novads, jaunjelgavas novads, jaunpiebalgas novads, jaunpils novads, j kabpils novads, jelgavas novads, kandavas novads, k rsavas novads, eguma novads, ekavas novads, koc nu novads, kokneses novads, kr slavas novads, krimuldas novads, krustpils novads, kuld gas novada doles, vandes, padures, rendas, kabiles, rumbas, kurm les, pel u, sn peles, turlavas, laidu un v rmes pagasts, kuld gas pils ta, lielv rdes novads, l gatnes novads, limba u novads, l v nu novads, lub nas novads, ludzas novads, madonas novads, m lpils novads, m rupes novads, mazsalacas novads, m rsraga novads, nauk nu novads, neretas novads, ogres novads, olaines novads, ozolnieku novads, p rgaujas novads, p avi u novads, prei u novads, priekules novads, prieku u novads, raunas novads, republikas pils ta daugavpils, republikas pils ta jelgava, republikas pils ta j kabpils, republikas pils ta j rmala, republikas pils ta r zekne, republikas pils ta valmiera, r zeknes novads, riebi u novads, rojas novads, ropa u novads, rug ju novads, rund les novads, r jienas novads, salacgr vas novads, salas novads, salaspils novads, saldus novada novadnieku, kurs u, zv rdes, pamp u, des, n grandes, za as, ezeres, rubas, jaunauces un vadakstes pagasts, saulkrastu novads, s jas novads, siguldas novads, skr veru novads, skrundas novads, smiltenes novads, stopi u novada da a, kas atrodas uz austrumiem no autoce a v36, p4 un p5, acones ielas, daugu upes ielas un daugu up tes, stren u novads, talsu novads, t rvetes novads, tukuma novads, vai odes novads, valkas novads, varak nu novads, v rkavas novads, vecpiebalgas novads, vecumnieku novads, ventspils novada ances, t rgales, popes, v rves, u avas, piltenes, puzes, ziru, ug les, usmas un zl ku pagasts, piltenes pils ta, vies tes novads, vi akas novads, vi nu novads, zilupes novads. 6. lithuania the following areas in lithuania: alytaus miesto savivaldyb , alytaus rajono savivaldyb , anyk i rajono savivaldyb , akmen s rajono savivaldyb : ventos ir papil s seni nijos, bir miesto savivaldyb , bir rajono savivaldyb , bir tono savivaldyb , druskinink savivaldyb , elektr n savivaldyb , ignalinos rajono savivaldyb , jonavos rajono savivaldyb , joni kio rajono savivaldyb : kepali , kriuk , saug laukio ir satk n seni nijos, jurbarko rajono savivaldyb , kai iadori rajono savivaldyb , kalvarijos savivaldyb , kauno miesto savivaldyb , kauno rajono savivaldyb , kazl r dos savivaldyb , kelm s rajono savivaldyb : tytuv n seni nijos dalis rytus ir pietus nuo kelio nr. 157 ir rytus nuo kelio nr. 2105 ir tytuv n apylinki seni nijos dalis pietus nuo kelio nr. 157 ir rytus nuo kelio nr. 2105, u ven io, kuke i dalis iaur nuo kelio nr. 2128 ir rytus nuo kelio nr. 2106, ir auk n seni nijos, k daini rajono savivaldyb , kupi kio rajono savivaldyb , lazdij rajono savivaldyb : b dvie io, kap iamie io, krosnos, ku i n ir norag li seni nijos, marijampol s savivaldyb , ma eiki rajono savivaldyb : erk n n , sedos ir idik seni nijos, mol t rajono savivaldyb , pakruojo rajono savivaldyb , panev io rajono savivaldyb , panev io miesto savivaldyb , pasvalio rajono savivaldyb , radvili kio rajono savivaldyb , prien rajono savivaldyb , raseini rajono savivaldyb : ariogalos, betygalos, pagojuk , iluvos,kalnuj seni nijos ir girkalnio seni nijos dalis pietus nuo kelio nr. a1, roki kio rajono savivaldyb , aki rajono savivaldyb , al inink rajono savivaldyb , iauli miesto savivaldyb , iauli rajono savivaldyb : iauli kaimi koji seni nija, ilut s rajono savivaldyb : rusn s seni nija, irvint rajono savivaldyb , ven ioni rajono savivaldyb , taurag s rajono savivaldyb : bataki ir gaur s seni nijos, tel i rajono savivaldyb , trak rajono savivaldyb , ukmerg s rajono savivaldyb , utenos rajono savivaldyb , var nos rajono savivaldyb , vilniaus miesto savivaldyb , vilniaus rajono savivaldyb , vilkavi kio rajono savivaldyb , visagino savivaldyb , zaras rajono savivaldyb . 7. poland the following areas in poland: w wojew dztwie warmi sko-mazurskim: gminy kalinowo, prostki, stare juchy i gmina wiejska e k w powiecie e ckim, gminy godkowo, milejewo, m ynary, pas k, cz gminy elbl g po o ona na p noc od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr s7 biegn c od granicy powiatu miejskigo elbl g do wschodniej granicy gminy elbl g, i cz obszaru l dowego gminy tolkmicko po o ona na po udnie od linii brzegowej zalewu wi lanego i zatoki elbl skiej do granicy z gmin wiejsk elbl g w powiecie elbl skim, powiat miejski elbl g, gmina wydminy, cz gminy mi ki po o ona na wsch d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 63, cz gminy ryn po o ona na p noc od linii kolejowej cz cej miejscowo ci gi ycko i ktrzyn, cz gminy wiejskiej gi ycko po o ona na p noc od linii kolejowej cz cej miejscowo ci gi ycko i ktrzyn, cz gminy wiejskiej gi ycko po o ona na zach d od zachodniej linii brzegowej jeziora kisajno, w kierunku po udniowym od granicy miasta gi ycko i od po udnia ograniczona drog nr 59 w powiecie gi yckim, powiat go dapski, gmina pozezdrze i cz gminy wgorzewo po o ona na zach d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 63 biegn c od po udniowo-wschodniej granicy gminy do skrzy owania z drog nr 650, a nastpnie na po udnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 650 biegn c od skrzy owania z drog nr 63 do skrzy owania z drog biegn c do miejscowo ci przysta i na wsch d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog cz c miejscowo ci przysta , pniewo, kamionek wielki, radzieje, d u ec w powiecie wgorzewskim, powiat olecki, gminy orzysz, bia a piska i cz gminy pisz po o ona na p noc od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 58 w powiecie piskim, gminy g rowo i aweckie z miastem g rowo i aweckie, bisztynek, cz gminy wiejskiej bartoszyce po o ona na zach d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 51 biegn c od p nocnej granicy gminy do skrzy owania z drog nr 57 i na zach d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 57 biegn c od skrzy owania z drog nr 51 do po udniowej granicy gminy i miasto bartoszyce w powiecie bartoszyckim, gmina kolno i cz gminy jeziorany po o ona na p noc od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 593 w powiecie olszty skim, powiat braniewski, gminy ktrzyn z miastem ktrzyn, reszel i cz gminy korsze po o ona na po udnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drog biegn c od wschodniej granicy cz c miejscowo ci krelikiejmy i s toczno i na wsch d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog cz c miejscowo ci s toczno, sajna wielka biegn c do skrzy owania z drog nr 590 w miejscowo ci glitajny, a nastpnie na wsch d od drogi nr 590 do skrzy owania z drog nr 592 i na po udnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 592 biegn c od zachodniej granicy gminy do skrzy owania z drog nr 590 w powiecie ktrzy skim, powiat lidzbarski, cz gminy sorkwity po o ona na p noc od drogi nr 16 i cz gminy wiejskiej mr gowo po o ona na p noc od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 16 biegn c od zachodniej granicy gminy do granicy miasta mr gowo oraz na p noc od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 59 biegn c od wschodniej granicy gminy do granicy miasta mr gowo w powiecie mr gowskim; w wojew dztwie podlaskim: powiat grajewski, powiat moniecki, powiat sejne ski, gminy om a, pi tnica, jedwabne, przytu y i wizna w powiecie om y skim, powiat miejski om a, gminy mielnik, nurzec stacja, grodzisk, drohiczyn, dziadkowice, milejczyce i siemiatycze z miastem siemiatyczew powiecie siemiatyckim, powiat hajnowski, gminy kobylin-borzymyi soko y w powiecie wysokomazowieckim, gminy grabowo i stawiski w powiecie kolne skim, gminy czarna bia ostocka, dobrzyniewo du e, gr dek, juchnowiec ko cielny, apy, micha owo, supra l, sura , turo ko cielna, tykocin, wasilk w, zab ud w, zawady i choroszcz w powiecie bia ostockim, gminy bo ki, orla, bielsk podlaski z miastem bielsk podlaski i cz gminy bra sk po o ona na po udnie od linii od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 66 biegn c od wschodniej granicy gminy do granicy miasta bra sk w powiecie bielskim, powiat suwalski, powiat miejski suwa ki, powiat augustowski, powiat sok lski, powiat miejski bia ystok; w wojew dztwie mazowieckim: gminy korczew, kotu , paprotnia, przesmyki, wodynie, sk rzec, mokobody, mordy, siedlce, sucho ebry i zbuczyn w powiecie siedleckim, powiat miejski siedlce, gminy repki, jab onna lacka, cz gminy bielany po o ona na wsch d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 63 i cz gminy wiejskiej soko w podlaski po o ona na wsch d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 63 w powiecie soko owskim, powiat osicki, gminy broch w, m odzieszyn, cz gminy teresin po o ona na p noc od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 92, cz gminy wiejskiej sochaczew po o ona na p noc od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 92 i cz miasta sochaczew po o ona na p nocny wsch d od linii wyznaczonej przez drogi nr 50 i 92 w powiecie sochaczewskim, powiat nowodworski, gminy joniec i nowe miasto w powiecie p o skim, gminy pokrzywnica, wiercze i cz gminy winnica po o ona na zach d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog cz c miejscowo ci bielany, winnica i pokrzywnica w powiecie pu tuskim, gminy d br wka, koby ka, marki, radzymin, wo omin, zielonka i z bki w powiecie wo omi skim, cz gminy somianka po o ona na po udnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 62 w powiecie wyszkowskim, gminy ceg w, dbe wielkie, halin w, latowicz, mrozy, siennica, sulej wek, cz gminy jakub w po o ona na po udnie od linii wyznaczoenj przez drog nr 92, cz gminy ka uszyn po o ona na po udnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drogi nr 2 i 92 i cz gminy mi sk mazowiecki po o ona na po udnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr a2 i miasto mi sk mazowiecki w powiecie mi skim, powiat garwoli ski, powiat otwocki, powiat warszawski zachodni, powiat legionowski, powiat piaseczy ski, powiat pruszkowski, gminy chyn w, gr jec, jasieniec, pniewy i warkaw powiecie gr jeckim, gminy milan wek, grodzisk mazowiecki, podkowa le na i abia wola w powiecie grodziskim, gminy grab w nad pilic , magnuszew, g owacz w, kozienice w powiecie kozienickim, cz gminy stromiec po o ona na p noc od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 48 w powiecie bia obrzeskim, powiat miejski warszawa; w wojew dztwie lubelskim: gminy borki, czemierniki, k kolewnica, komar wka podlaska, wohy i radzy podlaski z miastem radzy podlaski w powiecie radzy skim, gminy stoczek ukowski z miastem stoczek ukowski, wola mys owska, trzebiesz w, krzywda, stanin, cz gminy wiejskiej uk w po o ona na wsch d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 63 biegn c od p nocnej granicy gminy do granicy miasta uk w i na p noc od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 806 biegn c od wschodniej granicy miasta uk w do wschodniej granicy gminy wiejskiej uk w i miasto uk w w powiecie ukowskim, gminy jan w podlaski, kode , tuczna, le na podlaska, rossosz, omazy, konstantyn w, piszczac, rokitno, bia a podlaska, zalesie, terespol z miastem terespol, drel w, midzyrzec podlaski z miastem midzyrzec podlaski w powiecie bialskim, powiat miejski bia a podlaska, gmina czna i cz gminy spiczyn po o ona na zach d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 829 w powiecie czy skim, cz gminy siemie po o ona na zach d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 815 i cz gminy milan w po o ona na zach d od drogi nr 813 w powiecie parczewskim, gminy nied wiada, ostr wek, abram w, firlej, kamionka, mich w, lubart w z miastem lubart w i cz gminy kock po o ona na wsch d od linii wyznaczonej przez rzek czarn , w powiecie lubartowskim, gminy jab onna, krzczon w, niemce, garb w i w lka w powiecie lubelskim, gminy me giew, rybczewice i piaski w powiecie widnickim, gminy fajs awice, gorzk w, izbica, kra niczyn, cz gminy krasnystaw po o ona na zach d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 17 biegn c od p nocno wschodniej granicy gminy do granicy miasta krasnystaw, miasto krasnystaw i cz gminy opiennik g rny po o ona na zach d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 17 w powiecie krasnostawskim, gminy do hobycz w, mircze, trzeszczany, werbkowice i cz gminy wiejskiej hrubiesz w po o ona na po udnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 844 oraz na po udnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 74 i miasto hrubiesz w w powiecie hrubieszowskim, gmina telatyn, tyszowce i cz gminy aszcz w po o ona na p noc od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 852 w powiecie tomaszowskim, cz gminy wojs awice po o ona na zach d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog biegn c od p nocnej granicy gminy przez miejscowo wojs awice do po udniowej granicy gminy w powiecie che mskim, gminy grabowiec, skierbiesz w i stary zamo w powiecie zamojskim, gminy markusz w, na cz w, kazimierz dolny, ko skowola, kur w, w wolnica, yrzyn, baran w, cz gminy wiejskiej pu awy po o ona na wsch d od rzeki wis y i miasto pu awy w powiecie pu awskim, gminy annopol, dzierzkowice i go cierad w w powiecie kra nickim, gmina j zef w nad wis w powiecie opolskim, gminy k oczew i st yca w powiecie ryckim; w wojew dztwie podkarpackim: gminy radomy l nad sanem i zaklik w w powiecie stalowowolskim. 8. romania the following areas in romania: restul jude ului maramure care nu a fost inclus n partea iii cu urm toarele comune: comuna vieu de sus, comuna moisei, comuna bora, comuna oar a de jos, comuna suciu de sus, comuna coroieni, comuna t rgu l pu, comuna vima mic , comuna boiu mare, comuna valea chioarului, comuna ulmeni, comuna b seti, comuna baia mare, comuna t u ii magher u, comuna cic rl u, comuna seini, comuna ardusat, comuna farcasa, comuna salsig, comuna asuaju de sus, comuna b i a de sub codru, comuna bicaz, comuna grosi, comuna recea, comuna baia sprie, comuna sisesti, comuna cernesti, copalnic m n stur, comuna dumbr vi a, comuna cupseni, comuna omcu a mare, comuna sacaleeni, comuna remetea chioarului, comuna mireu mare, comuna arini, jude ul bistri a-n s ud. part iii 1. latvia the following areas in latvia: broc nu novada cieceres un gai u pagasts, remtes pagasta da a uz rietumiem no autoce a 1154 un p109, broc nu pils ta, saldus novada saldus, zir u, lutri u un jaunlutri u pagasts, saldus pils ta. 2. lithuania the following areas in lithuania: akmen s rajono savivaldyb : akmen s, kruopi , naujosios akmen s kaimi koji ir naujosios akmen s miesto seni nijos, joni kio rajono savivaldyb : gai ai i , gatau i , joni kio, rudi ki , skaistgirio, agar s seni nijos, lazdij rajono savivaldyb : lazdij miesto, lazdij , seirij , e tok , vente erio ir veisiej seni nijos, ma eiki rajono savivaldyb s: lai uvos, ma eiki apylink s, ma eiki , reivy i , tirk li ir viek ni seni nijos, iauli rajono savivaldyb s: bubi , gink n , gruzd i , kairi , kur n kaimi koji, kur n miesto, ku i , me kui i , raud n ir akynos seni nijos. 3. poland the following areas in poland: w wojew dztwie warmi sko-mazurskim: gmina spopol i cz gminy wiejskiej bartoszyce po o ona na wsch d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 51 biegn c od p nocnej granicy gminy do skrzy owania z drog nr 57 i na wsch d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 57 biegn c od skrzy owania z drog nr 51 do po udniowej granicy gminy w powiecie bartoszyckim, gminy srokowo, barciany i cz gminy korsze po o ona na p noc od linii wyznaczonej przez drog biegn c od wschodniej granicy cz c miejscowo ci krelikiejmy i s toczno i na zach d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog cz c miejscowo ci s toczno, sajna wielka biegn c do skrzy owania z drog nr 590 w miejscowo ci glitajny, a nastpnie na zach d od drogi nr 590 do skrzy owania z drog nr 592 i na p noc od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 592 biegn c od zachodniej granicy gminy do skrzy owania z drog nr 590 w powiecie ktrzy skim, gmina budry i cz gminy wgorzewo po o ona na wsch d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 63 biegn c od po udniowo-wschodniej granicy gminy do skrzy owania z drog nr 650, a nastpnie na p noc od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 650 biegn c od skrzy owania z drog nr 63 do skrzy owania z drog biegn c do miejscowo ci przysta i na zach d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog cz c miejscowo ci przysta , pniewo, kamionek wielki, radzieje, d u ec w powiecie wgorzewskim, gmina pozezdrze w powiecie wgorzewskim, gmina kruklanki, cz gminy gi ycko po o ona na wsch d od zachodniej linii brzegowej jeziora kisajno do granic miasta gi ycko oraz na wsch d od fragmentu drogi nr 63 biegn cej od po udniowo-wchodniej granicy miasta gi ycko do granicy gminy gi ycko, miasto gi ycko, w wojew dztwie mazowieckim: gminy domanice i wi niew w powiecie siedleckim, w wojew dztwie lubelskim: gminy bia opole, dubienka, che m, le niowice, wierzbica, sawin, ruda huta, dorohusk, kamie , rejowiec, rejowiec fabryczny z miastem rejowiec fabryczny, siedliszcze, mud i cz gminy wojs awice po o ona na wsch d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog biegn c od p nocnej granicy gminy do miejscowo ci wojs awice do po udniowej granicy gminy w powiecie che mskim, powiat miejski che m, gmina siennica r ana cz gminy opiennik g rny po o ona na wsch d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 17 i cz gminy krasnystaw po o ona na wsch d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 17 biegn c od p nocno wschodniej granicy gminy do granicy miasta krasnystaw w powiecie krasnostawskim, gminy hanna, ha sk, wola uhruska, urszulin, stary brus, wyryki i gmina wiejska w odawa w powiecie w odawskim, gminy cyc w, ludwin, puchacz w, milej w i cz gminy spiczyn po o ona na wsch d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 829 w powiecie czy skim, gmina trawniki w powiecie widnickim, gminy jab o , podedw rze, dbowa k oda, parczew, sosnowica, cz gminy siemie po o ona na wsch d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 815 i cz gminy milan w po o ona na wsch d od drogi nr 813 w powiecie parczewskim, gminy s awatycze, sosn wka, i wisznice w powiecie bialskim, gmina ulan majorat w powiecie radzy skim, gminy ostr w lubelski, serniki i u cim w w powiecie lubartowskim, gmina wojcieszk w i cz gminy wiejskiej uk w po o ona na zach d od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 63 biegn c od p nocnej granicy gminy do granicy miasta uk w, a nastpnie na p noc, zach d, po udnie i wsch d od linii stanowi cej p nocn , zachodni , po udniow i wschodni granic miasta uk w do jej przecicia si z drog nr 806 i na po udnie od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 806 biegn c od wschodniej granicy miasta uk w do wschodniej granicy gminy wiejskiej uk w w powiecie ukowskim, gminy horod o, uchanie i cz gminy wiejskiej hrubiesz w po o ona na p noc od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 844 biegn c od zachodniej granicy gminy wiejskiej hrubiesz w do granicy miasta hrubiesz w oraz na p noc od linii wyznaczonej przez drog nr 74 biegn c od wschodniej granicy miasta hrubiesz w do wschodniej granicy gminy wiejskiej hrubiesz w w powiecie hrubieszowskim, 4. romania the following areas in romania: zona oraului bucureti, jude ul constan a, jude ul satu mare, jude ul tulcea, jude ul bac u, jude ul bihor, jude ul br ila, jude ul buz u, jude ul c l rai, jude ul d mbovi a, jude ul gala i, jude ul giurgiu, jude ul ialomi a, jude ul ilfov, jude ul prahova, jude ul s laj, jude ul vaslui, jude ul vrancea, jude ul teleorman, partea din jude ul maramure cu urm toarele delimit ri: comuna petrova, comuna bistra, comuna repedea, comuna poienile de sub munte, comuna vieu e jos, comuna ruscova, comuna leordina, comuna rozavlea, comuna str mtura, comuna b rsana, comuna rona de sus, comuna rona de jos, comuna bocoiu mare, comuna sighetu marma iei, comuna sarasau, comuna c mpulung la tisa, comuna s p n a, comuna remeti, comuna giuleti, comuna ocna ugatag, comuna deseti, comuna budeti, comuna b iu , comuna cavnic, comuna l pu, comuna dragomireti, comuna ieud, comuna salitea de sus, comuna s cel, comuna c lineti, comuna vadu izei, comuna botiza, comuna bogdan vod , localitatea groii ibileului, comuna suciu de sus, localitatea vieu de mijloc, comuna vieu de sus, localitatea vieu de sus, comuna vieu de sus. partea din jude ul mehedin i cu urm toarele comune: comuna strehaia, comuna greci, comuna brejnita motru, comuna butoieti, comuna st ng ceaua, comuna grozesti, comuna dumbrava de jos, comuna b cles, comuna b l ci a, jude ul arge, jude ul olt, jude ul dolj, jude ul arad, jude ul timi, jude ul covasna, jude ul braov, jude ul botoani. part iv italy the following areas in italy: tutto il territorio della sardegna.

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/874 of 22 may 2019 on the clearance of the accounts of the paying agencies of member states concerning expenditure financed by the european agricultural guarantee fund (eagf) for financial year 2018 (notified under document c(2019) 3820) type: decision_impl subject matter: eu finance; agricultural policy; economic geography; accounting date published: 2019-05-28 28.5.2019 en official journal of the european union l 140/115 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/874 of 22 may 2019 on the clearance of the accounts of the paying agencies of member states concerning expenditure financed by the european agricultural guarantee fund (eagf) for financial year 2018 (notified under document c(2019) 3820) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to regulation (eu) no 1306/2013 of the european parliament and of the council of 17 december 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing council regulations (eec) no 352/78, (ec) no 165/94, (ec) no 2799/98, (ec) no 814/2000, (ec) no 1290/2005 and (ec) no 485/2008 (1), and in particular article 51 thereof, after consulting the committee on the agricultural funds, whereas: (1) pursuant to article 51 of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013, the commission, on the basis of the annual accounts submitted by the member states, accompanied by the information required for the clearance of accounts and an audit opinion regarding the completeness, accuracy and veracity of the accounts and the reports established by the certification bodies, has to clear the accounts of the paying agencies referred to in article 7 of that regulation prior to 31 may of the year following the budget year in question. (2) in accordance with article 39 of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013 the agricultural financial year begins on 16 october of year n 1 and ends on 15 october of year n. when clearing the accounts for financial year 2018, account should be taken of expenditure incurred by the member states between 16 october 2017 and 15 october 2018, as provided for in article 11(1) of commission implementing regulation (eu) no 908/2014 (2). (3) the first subparagraph of article 33(2) of implementing regulation (eu) no 908/2014 provides that the amounts that are recoverable from, or payable to, each member state, in accordance with the accounts clearance decision referred to in article 33(1) of that regulation, are to be established by deducting the monthly payments for the financial year concerned from expenditure recognised for that year in accordance with article 33(1). the commission is to deduct that amount from or add it to the monthly payment relating to the expenditure effected in the second month following the clearance of accounts decision. (4) the commission has checked the information submitted by the member states and has communicated the results of its checks to the member states before 30 april 2019, along with the necessary amendments. (5) for all paying agencies concerned, the annual accounts and the accompanying documents permit the commission to take a decision on the completeness, accuracy and veracity of the annual accounts submitted. (6) in accordance with article 5(5) of commission delegated regulation (eu) no 907/2014 (3), any overrun of deadlines during august, september and october is to be taken into account in the clearance of accounts decision. some of the expenditure declared by certain member states during those months in 2018 was effected after the applicable deadlines. this decision should therefore fix the relevant reductions. (7) pursuant to article 41 of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013, the commission has already reduced or suspended a number of monthly payments for financial year 2018 due to failure to comply with financial ceilings or payment deadlines, or due to control system deficiencies. in this decision, the commission should take into account such reduced or suspended amounts in order to avoid making any inappropriate, or untimely, payments or reimbursements which could later be subject to financial correction. the amounts in question may be examined, where appropriate, under conformity clearance proceedings pursuant to article 52 of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013. (8) pursuant to article 54(2) of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013, 50 % of the financial consequences of non-recovery of irregularities should be borne by the member state concerned, if recovery has not taken place within four years from the date of the recovery request, or within eight years where the recovery is taken before the national courts. article 54(4) of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013 requires member states to attach to the annual accounts that they have to submit to the commission pursuant to article 29 of implementing regulation (eu) no 908/2014 a certified table reflecting the amounts to be borne by them under article 54(2) of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013. rules on the application of the member states' obligation to report the amounts to be recovered are laid down in implementing regulation (eu) no 908/2014. annex ii to implementing regulation (eu) no 908/2014 sets out the model of the table that member states have to use to provide information about amounts to be recovered. on the basis of the tables completed by the member states, the commission should decide on the financial consequences of non-recovery of irregularities older than four or eight years respectively. (9) pursuant to article 54(3) of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013, on duly justified grounds, member states may decide not to pursue recovery. such a decision may be taken only if the costs already, and likely to be, incurred total more than the amount to be recovered, or if the recovery proves impossible owing to the insolvency, recorded and recognised under national law, of the debtor or the persons legally responsible for the irregularity. if the decision has been taken within four years from the date of the recovery request or within eight years where the recovery is taken to the national courts, 100 % of the financial consequences of the non-recovery should be borne by the union budget. the amounts for which the member state decided not to pursue recovery and the grounds for the decision are shown in the summary report referred to in article 54(4) of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013 in conjunction with point (c)(iv) of the first subparagraph of article 102(1) of that regulation. therefore, such amounts should not be charged to the member states concerned and are consequently borne by the union budget. (10) reductions according to article 54(2) of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013 presented in annex i (column e) relate to the european agricultural guarantee fund (eagf). the amounts to be charged to the member states, as a result of the application of article 54(2) of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013 in relation to the temporary rural development instrument (trdi) funded by the european agricultural guidance and guarantee fund (eaggf) (4) are presented in annex ii. (11) in accordance with article 51 of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013, this decision should be without prejudice to the decisions the commission may take subsequently to exclude from union financing expenditure not effected in accordance with union rules, has adopted this decision: article 1 the accounts of the member states' paying agencies are hereby cleared as regards expenditure financed by the european agricultural guarantee fund (eagf) in respect of financial year 2018. the amounts recoverable from, or payable to, each member state pursuant to this decision, including those resulting from the application of article 54(2) of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013, are set out in annexes i and ii to this decision. article 2 this decision is without prejudice to future conformity clearance decisions that the commission may take pursuant to article 52 of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013 to exclude from union financing expenditure not effected in accordance with union rules. article 3 this decision is addressed to the member states. done at brussels, 22 may 2019. for the commission phil hogan member of the commission (1) oj l 347, 20 12 2013, p. 549. (2) commission implementing regulation (eu) no 908/2014 of 6 august 2014 laying down rules for the application of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to paying agencies and other bodies, financial management, clearance of accounts, rules on checks, securities and transparency (oj l 255, 28.8.2014, p. 59). (3) commission delegated regulation (eu) no 907/2014 of 11 march 2014 supplementing regulation (eu) no 1306/2013 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to paying agencies and other bodies, financial management, clearance of accounts, securities and use of euro (oj l 255, 28 8.2014, p. 18). (4) commission regulation (ec) no 27/2004 of 5 january 2004 laying down transitional detailed rules for the application of council regulation (ec) no 1257/1999 as regards the financing by the eaggf guarantee section of rural development measures in the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, poland, slovenia and slovakia (oj l 5, 9.1.2004, p. 36). annex i clearance of the paying agencies' accounts financial year 2018 amount to be recovered from or paid to the member state ms 2018 - expenditure / assigned revenue for the paying agencies for which the accounts are total a + b reductions and suspensions for the whole financial year (1) amount to be charged according to article 54(2) of regulation (eu) 1306/2013 total including reductions and suspensions payments made to the member state for the financial year amount to be recovered from (-) or paid to (+) the member state (2) cleared disjoined = expenditure / assigned revenue declared in the annual declaration = total of the expenditure / assigned revenue in the monthly declarations a b c = a + b d e f = c + d + e g h = f g at eur 716 420 978,95 0,00 716 420 978,95 37 170,38 0,00 716 383 808,57 715 609 830,36 773 978,21 be eur 601 303 115,40 0,00 601 303 115,40 114 596,75 1 626,78 601 186 891,87 601 394 318,15 207 426,28 bg bgn 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 1 063 919,18 1 063 919,18 0,00 1 063 919,18 bg eur 807 146 800,18 0,00 807 146 800,18 334 145,99 0,00 806 812 654,19 807 673 988,10 861 333,91 cy eur 56 393 523,10 0,00 56 393 523,10 0,00 0,00 56 393 523,10 56 387 865,72 5 657,38 cz czk 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 cz eur 838 161 503,79 0,00 838 161 503,79 0,00 0,00 838 161 503,79 838 147 041,76 14 462,03 de eur 4 985 090 101,50 0,00 4 985 090 101,50 0,00 33 688,08 4 985 056 413,42 4 985 034 668,19 21 745,23 dk dkk 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 125 077,44 125 077,44 0,00 125 077,44 dk eur 840 515 032,68 0,00 840 515 032,68 26 565,01 0,00 840 488 467,67 840 392 409,55 96 058,12 ee eur 125 125 241,18 0,00 125 125 241,18 0,00 0,00 125 125 241,18 125 117 498,73 7 742,45 es eur 5 470 755 305,48 0,00 5 470 755 305,48 2 766 915,88 621 928,73 5 467 366 460,87 5 466 953 232,06 413 228,81 fi eur 528 528 562,98 0,00 528 528 562,98 161 352,27 28 687,91 528 338 522,80 528 456 887,44 118 364,64 fr eur 7 648 093 429,39 0,00 7 648 093 429,39 6 120 649,32 460 572,15 7 641 512 207,92 7 656 033 220,25 14 521 012,33 el eur 2 011 103 975,47 0,00 2 011 103 975,47 3 028 436,21 1 638 086,99 2 006 437 452,27 2 008 075 711,50 1 638 259,23 hr hrk 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 hr eur 247 188 806,71 0,00 247 188 806,71 6 040,18 0,00 247 182 766,53 247 212 246,42 29 479,89 hu huf 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 135 165 891,00 135 165 891,00 0,00 135 165 891,00 hu eur 1 295 635 431,84 0,00 1 295 635 431,84 6 020 231,35 0,00 1 289 615 200,49 1 289 615 200,46 0,03 ie eur 1 223 596 530,54 0,00 1 223 596 530,54 62 608,10 21 661,81 1 223 512 260,63 1 222 580 002,15 932 258,48 it eur 4 103 975 978,84 0,00 4 103 975 978,84 28 260 620,76 2 680 831,62 4 073 034 526,46 4 073 733 454,03 698 927,57 lt eur 486 858 049,12 0,00 486 858 049,12 15 736,20 360,43 486 841 952,49 486 843 109,25 1 156,76 lu eur 33 289 659,49 0,00 33 289 659,49 0,00 3 565,63 33 286 093,86 33 238 794,75 47 299,11 lv eur 236 722 594,21 0,00 236 722 594,21 25,73 5 168,56 236 717 399,92 236 722 568,48 5 168,56 mt eur 5 242 305,77 0,00 5 242 305,77 0,00 188,03 5 242 117,74 5 242 197,66 79,92 nl eur 771 773 154,17 0,00 771 773 154,17 598 043,02 30 577,93 771 144 533,22 771 207 737,79 63 204,57 pl pln 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 404 820,57 404 820,57 0,00 404 820,57 pl eur 3 307 605 902,16 0,00 3 307 605 902,16 1 032 358,05 0,00 3 306 573 544,11 3 306 631 578,16 58 034,05 pt eur 741 596 343,22 0,00 741 596 343,22 357 889,15 1 149 963,88 740 088 490,19 740 070 095,58 18 394,61 ro ron 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 1 046 041,22 1 046 041,22 0,00 1 046 041,22 ro eur 1 766 218 852,60 0,00 1 766 218 852,60 10 850 789,64 0,00 1 755 368 062,96 1 768 957 065,95 13 589 002,99 se sek 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 142 754,87 142 754,87 0,00 142 754,87 se eur 697 300 129,50 0,00 697 300 129,50 339 025,48 0,00 696 961 104,02 696 962 292,44 1 188,42 si eur 141 823 320,05 0,00 141 823 320,05 0,00 0,00 141 823 320,05 141 823 320,05 0,00 sk eur 445 619 721,44 0,00 445 619 721,44 2 527 026,73 0,00 443 092 694,71 443 092 226,31 468,40 ms expenditure (3) assigned revenue (3) article 54(2) (=e) total (=h) 05 07 01 06 6701 6702 i j k l = i+j+k at eur 773 978,21 0,00 0,00 773 978,21 be eur 0,00 205 799,50 1 626,78 207 426,28 bg bgn 0,00 0,00 1 063 919,18 1 063 919,18 bg eur 0,00 861 333,91 0,00 861 333,91 cy eur 17 353,45 11 696,07 0,00 5 657,38 cz czk 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 cz eur 14 462,03 0,00 0,00 14 462,03 de eur 57 166,41 1 733,10 33 688,08 21 745,23 dk dkk 0,00 0,00 125 077,44 125 077,44 dk eur 96 058,12 0,00 0,00 96 058,12 ee eur 7 742,45 0,00 0,00 7 742,45 es eur 1 035 157,54 0,00 621 928,73 413 228,81 fi eur 0,00 89 676,73 28 687,91 118 364,64 fr eur 0,00 14 060 440,18 460 572,15 14 521 012,33 el eur 0,00 172,24 1 638 086,99 1 638 259,23 hr hrk 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 hr eur 0,00 29 479,89 0,00 29 479,89 hu huf 0,00 0,00 135 165 891,00 135 165 891,00 hu eur 0,03 0,00 0,00 0,03 ie eur 953 920,29 0,00 21 661,81 932 258,48 it eur 1 981 904,05 0,00 2 680 831,62 698 927,57 lt eur 0,00 796,33 360,43 1 156,76 lu eur 50 864,74 0,00 3 565,63 47 299,11 lv eur 0,00 0,00 5 168,56 5 168,56 mt eur 108,13 0,02 188,03 79,92 nl eur 0,00 32 626,64 30 577,93 63 204,57 pl pln 0,00 0,00 404 820,57 404 820,57 pl eur 0,00 58 034,05 0,00 58 034,05 pt eur 1 168 358,49 0,00 1 149 963,88 18 394,61 ro ron 0,00 0,00 1 046 041,22 1 046 041,22 ro eur 0,00 13 589 002,99 0,00 13 589 002,99 se sek 0,00 0,00 142 754,87 142 754,87 se eur 0,00 1 188,42 0,00 1 188,42 si eur 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 sk eur 468,40 0,00 0,00 468,40 nb: nomenclature 2019: 05 07 01 06, 6701, 6702 (1) the reductions and suspensions are those taken into account in the payment system, to which are added in particular the corrections for the non respect of payment deadlines established in august, september and october 2018 and other reductions in the context of article 41 of regulation (eu) no 1306/2013. (2) for the calculation of the amount to be recovered from or paid to the member state the amount taken into account is, the total of the annual declaration for the expenditure cleared (col.a) or, the total of the monthly declarations for the expenditure disjoined (col.b). applicable exchange rate: the second sentence of the first subparagraph of article 11(1) of the commission delegated regulation (eu) no 907/2014. (3) bl 05 07 01 06 shall be split between the negative corrections which become assigned revenue in bl 67 01 and the positive ones in favour of ms which shall now be included on the expenditure side 05 07 01 06 as per article 43 of r 1306/2013. annex ii clearance of the paying agencies' accounts financial year 2018 - eagf corrections according to article 54(2) of regulation (eu) 1306/2013 (1) member state currency in national currency in euro at eur be eur bg bgn cy eur cz czk 3 149 709,47 de eur dk dkk ee eur es eur fi eur fr eur el eur hr hrk hu huf 11 329 127,00 ie eur it eur lt eur 79 900,38 lu eur lv eur 64 214,94 mt eur nl eur pl pln 614 231,29 pt eur ro ron se sek si eur sk eur 164 867,37 (1) only the corrections related to trdi are communicated in this annex

name: council decision (eu) 2019/864 of 14 may 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the european union in the north atlantic salmon conservation organization (nasco), and repealing the decision of 26 may 2014 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the union, in the nasco type: decision subject matter: fisheries; natural environment; european construction; environmental policy date published: 2019-05-28 28.5.2019 en official journal of the european union l 140/54 council decision (eu) 2019/864 of 14 may 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the european union in the north atlantic salmon conservation organization (nasco), and repealing the decision of 26 may 2014 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the union, in the nasco the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 43, in conjunction with article 218(9) thereof, having regard to the proposal from the european commission, whereas: (1) by council decision 82/886/eec (1), the union concluded the convention for the conservation of salmon in the north atlantic ocean (2) (nasco convention), which established the north atlantic salmon conservation organization (nasco). (2) the nasco council, which is supported by the three commissions (the north american commission, the north-east atlantic commission and the west greenland commission), is the body established by the nasco convention to conserve, restore, enhance and rationally manage atlantic salmon through international cooperation. the nasco council adopts conservation and management measures to manage of the fishery resources under their purview. such measures may become binding upon the union. (3) regulation (eu) no 1380/2013 of the european parliament and of the council (3) provides that the union is to ensure that fishing and aquaculture activities are environmentally sustainable in the long term and are managed in a way that is consistent with the objectives of achieving economic, social and employment benefits, and of contributing to the availability of food supplies. it also provides that the union is to apply the precautionary approach to fisheries management, and is to aim to ensure that exploitation of marine biological resources restores and maintains population of harvested species above levels which can produce the maximum sustainable yield. it further provides that the union is to take management and conservation measures based on the best available scientific advice, to support the development of scientific knowledge and advice, to gradually eliminate discards and to promote fishing methods that contribute to more selective fishing and the avoidance and reduction, as far as possible, of unwanted catches, to fishing with low impact on marine ecosystem and fishery resources. furthermore, regulation (eu) no 1380/2013 specifically provides that those objectives and principles are to be applied by the union in the conduct of its external fisheries relations. (4) as stated in the joint communication by the high representative of the union for foreign affairs and security policy and the european commission international ocean governance: an agenda for the future of oceans, and the council conclusions on that joint communication, the promotion of measures to support and enhance the effectiveness of regional fisheries management organisations (rfmos) and, where relevant, improve their governance is central to the union's action in these fora. (5) the communication from the commission to the european parliament, to the council, to the european economic and social committee and to the committee of the regions european strategy for plastics in a circular economy, refers to specific measures to reduce plastics and marine pollution as well as the loss or abandonment at sea of fishing gear. (6) it is appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the union's behalf in the meetings of the nasco council, as the nasco conservation and enforcement measures will be binding on the union and capable of decisively influencing the content of union law, namely, council regulations (ec) no 1005/2008 (4) and (ec) no 1224/2009 (5), and regulation (eu) 2017/2403 of the european parliament and of the council (6). (7) currently, the position to be taken on the union's behalf in the meetings of the nasco council is established by the council decision of 26 may 2014 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the union, in the nasco. it is appropriate to repeal that decision and to replace it by a new decision which would cover the period 2019-2023. (8) in view of the evolving nature of fishery resources in the nasco convention area and the consequent need for the position of the union to take account of new developments, including new scientific and other relevant information presented before or during the meetings of the nasco, procedures must be established, in line with the principle of sincere cooperation among the union institutions enshrined in article 13(2) of the treaty on european union, for the year-to-year specification of the union's position for the period 2019-2023, has adopted this decision: article 1 the position to be taken on the union in the meetings of the north atlantic salmon conservation organization (nasco) council is set out in annex i. article 2 the year-to-year specification of the union's position to be taken in the meetings of the nasco council shall be conducted in accordance with annex ii. article 3 the union's position set out in annex i shall be assessed and, where appropriate, revised by the council upon a proposal from the commission, at the latest for the annual meeting of the nasco council in 2024. article 4 the council decision of 26 may 2014 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the european union, in the north atlantic salmon conservation organisation (nasco) is hereby repealed. article 5 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at brussels, 14 may 2019. for the council the president p. daea (1) council decision 82/886/eec of 13 december 1982 concerning the conclusion of the convention for the conservation of salmon in the north atlantic ocean (oj l 378, 31.12.1982, p. 24). (2) oj l 378, 31.12.1982, p. 25. (3) regulation (eu) no 1380/2013 of the european parliament and of the council of 11 december 2013 on the common fisheries policy, amending council regulations (ec) no 1954/2003 and (ec) no 1224/2009 and repealing council regulations (ec) no 2371/2002 and (ec) no 639/2004 and council decision 2004/585/ec (oj l 354, 28.12.2013, p. 22). (4) council regulation (ec) no 1005/2008 of 29 september 2008 establishing a community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, amending regulations (eec) no 2847/93, (ec) no 1936/2001 and (ec) no 601/2004 and repealing regulations (ec) no 1093/94 and (ec) no 1447/1999 (oj l 286, 29.10.2008, p. 1). (5) council regulation (ec) no 1224/2009 of 20 november 2009 establishing a union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy, amending regulations (ec) no 847/96, (ec) no 2371/2002, (ec) no 811/2004, (ec) no 768/2005, (ec) no 2115/2005, (ec) no 2166/2005, (ec) no 388/2006, (ec) no 509/2007, (ec) no 676/2007, (ec) no 1098/2007, (ec) no 1300/2008, (ec) no 1342/2008 and repealing regulations (eec) no 2847/93, (ec) no 1627/94 and (ec) no 1966/2006 (oj l 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1). (6) regulation (eu) 2017/2403 of the european parliament and of the council of 12 december 2017 on the sustainable management of external fishing fleets, and repealing council regulation (ec) no 1006/2008 (oj l 347, 28.12.2017, p. 81). annex i the position to be taken on the union's behalf in the north atlantic salmon conservation organisation (nasco) 1. principles in the framework of the nasco, the union shall: a) act in accordance with the objectives and principles pursued by the union within the common fisheries policy (cfp), notably through the precautionary approach and the aims related to the maximum sustainable yield as laid down in article 2(2) of regulation (eu) no 1380/2013, to promote the implementation of an ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management and limiting environmental impacts of fishing activities, to avoid and reduce, as far as possible, unwanted catches, and gradually eliminate discards, and to minimise the impact of fishing activities on marine ecosystems and their habitats, as well as, through the promotion of economically viable and competitive union fisheries, to provide a fair standard of living for those who depend on fishing activities and taking account of the interests of consumers; b) ensure that measures adopted within the nasco are in accordance with the nasco convention; c) ensure that measures adopted within the nasco are consistent with international law, and in particular with the provisions of the un convention on the law of the sea and its article 66, the agreement to promote compliance with international conservation and management measures by fishing vessels on the high seas; and the 2009 food and agriculture organization port state measures agreement; d) promote positions consistent with the best practices of regional fisheries management organisations (rfmos) in the same area; e) seek consistency and synergy with the policy that the union is pursuing as part of its bilateral fisheries relations with third countries, and ensure coherence with its other policies notably in external relations, employment, environment, trade, development, research and innovation; f) ensure that the union's international commitments are respected; g) be in line with the council conclusions of 19 march 2012 on the commission communication on the external dimension of the common fisheries policy (1); h) aim to create a level playing field for the union fleet within the convention area based on the same principles and standards as those applicable under union law, and to promote the uniform implementation of those principles and standards; i) be in line with the council conclusions (2) on the joint communication by the high representative of the union for foreign affairs and security policy and the european commission on international ocean governance: an agenda for the future of oceans (3) and promote measures to support and enhance the effectiveness of the nasco and, where relevant, improve its governance and performance (e.g. on science, compliance, transparency and decision-making) as a contribution to the sustainable management of oceans in all its dimensions; j) promote coordination between rfmos and regional sea conventions (rscs) and cooperation with global organisations, as applicable, within their mandates, and in particular promote coordination with ospar, to which the union is also a contracting party; k) promote cooperation mechanisms amongst non-tuna rfmos similar to the so-called kobe process for tuna rfmos. 2. orientations the union shall, where appropriate, endeavour to support the adoption of the following actions by the nasco: a) conservation and management measures for fisheries resources in the convention area based on the best scientific advice available, including total allowable catches (tacs) and quotas or effort regulation for living marine biological resources regulated by the nasco, which would bring or maintain the achievement of the maximum sustainable yield exploitation rate at the latest by 2020. where necessary, specific measures for stocks, which suffer from overfishing shall be considered in order to keep the fishing effort in line with available fishing opportunities; b) measures to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated (iuu) fishing activities in the convention area, including iuu vessel listing; c) measures to reinforce fisheries' scientific data collection and promote better cooperation between the industry and scientists; d) monitoring, control and surveillance measures in the nasco convention area in order to ensure efficiency of control and compliance with measures adopted within the nasco; e) measures to minimise the negative impact of fishing activities and aquaculture on marine biodiversity and marine ecosystems and their habitats, including measures to reduce marine pollution and prevent the discharge of plastics at sea and reduce the impact on marine biodiversity and ecosystems of plastics present at sea, protective measures for vulnerable marine ecosystems in the nasco convention area in line the fao international guidelines for the management of deep-sea fisheries in the high seas, measures to avoid and reduce as far as possible unwanted catches, including in particular vulnerable marine species, and to gradually eliminate discards; f) measures to reduce the impact of abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear (aldfg) in the ocean and to facilitate the identification and recovery of such gear; g) measures aimed at the prohibition of fisheries conducted solely for the purpose of harvesting shark fins and requiring that all sharks are landed with each fin naturally attached; h) common approaches with other rfmos, where appropriate, in particular those involved in fisheries management in the same region; i) recommendations, where appropriate and to the extent permitted under the relevant constituent documents, encouraging the implementation of the work in fishing convention of the international labour organisation (ilo); j) additional technical measures based on advice from the subsidiary bodies and working groups of nasco. (1) 7087/12 rev 1 add 1 cor 1. (2) 7348/1/17 rev 1 of 24.3.2017. (3) join(2016) 49 final of 10.11.2016. annex ii year to year specification of the union's position to be taken at meetings of the north atlantic salmon conservation organisation before each meeting of the nasco council, when that body is called upon to adopt decisions that may become binding upon the union, the necessary steps shall be taken so that the position to be expressed on the union's behalf takes account of the latest scientific and other relevant information transmitted to the commission, in accordance with the principles and orientations set out in annex i. to this effect, and based on that information, the commission shall transmit to the council in sufficient time before each meeting of the nasco council a written document setting out the particulars of the proposed specification of the union's position for discussion and endorsement of the details of the position to be expressed on the union's behalf. if in the course of a nasco council meeting it is impossible to reach an agreement, including on the spot, in order for the union's position to take account of new elements, the matter shall be referred to the council or its preparatory bodies.

name: council decision (eu) 2019/862 of 14 may 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the european union in the western and central pacific fisheries commission (wcpfc), and repealing the decision of 12 june 2014 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the union, for the conservation and management of highly migratory fish stocks in the wcpfc type: decision subject matter: fisheries; natural environment; international affairs; environmental policy date published: 2019-05-28 28.5.2019 en official journal of the european union l 140/44 council decision (eu) 2019/862 of 14 may 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the european union in the western and central pacific fisheries commission (wcpfc), and repealing the decision of 12 june 2014 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the union, for the conservation and management of highly migratory fish stocks in the wcpfc the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 43, in conjunction with article 218(9) thereof, having regard to the proposal from the european commission, whereas: (1) by council decision 2005/75/ec (1), the union concluded the convention on the conservation and management of highly migratory fish stocks in the western and central pacific ocean (2) (wcpf convention), which established the western and central pacific fisheries commission (wcpfc). (2) the wcpfc is responsible for the management and conservation of the fishery resources of the wcpf convention area. the wcpfc adopts conservation and management measures to ensure the long term sustainability of highly migratory fish stocks in the wcpf convention area and to promote their optimum utilisation. such measures may become binding upon the union. (3) regulation (eu) no 1380/2013 of the european parliament and of the council (3) provides that the union is to ensure that fishing and aquaculture activities are environmentally sustainable in the long term and are managed in a way that is consistent with the objectives of achieving economic, social and employment benefits, and of contributing to the availability of food supplies. it also provides that the union is to apply the precautionary approach to fisheries management, and is to aim to ensure that exploitation of marine biological resources restores and maintains population of harvested species above levels which can produce the maximum sustainable yield. it further provides that the union is to take management and conservation measures based on the best available scientific advice, to support the development of scientific knowledge and advice, to gradually eliminate discards and to promote fishing methods that contribute to more selective fishing and the avoidance and reduction, as far as possible, of unwanted catches, to fishing with low impact on marine ecosystem and fishery resources. furthermore, regulation (eu) no 1380/2013 specifically provides that those objectives and principles are to be applied by the union in the conduct of its external fisheries relations. (4) as stated in the joint communication by the high representative of the union for foreign affairs and security policy and the european commission international ocean governance: an agenda for the future of oceans, and the council conclusions on that joint communication, the promotion of measures to support and enhance the effectiveness of regional fisheries management organisations (rfmos) and, where relevant, improve their governance is central to the union's action in these fora. (5) the communication from the commission to the european parliament, to the council, to the european economic and social committee and to the committee of the regions european strategy for plastics in a circular economy, refers to specific measures to reduce plastics and marine pollution as well as the loss or abandonment at sea of fishing gear. (6) it is appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the union's behalf in the meetings of the wcpfc for the period 2019-2023, as the wcpfc conservation and enforcement measures will be binding on the union and capable of decisively influencing the content of union law, namely, council regulations (ec) no 1005/2008 (4) and (ec) no 1224/2009 (5), and regulation (eu) 2017/2403 of the european parliament and of the council (6). (7) currently, the position to be taken on the union's behalf in the meetings of the wcpfc is established by the council decision of 12 june 2014 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the union, for the conservation and management of highly migratory fish stocks in the wcpfc. it is appropriate to repeal that decision and to replace it by a new decision which would coverfor the period 2019-2023. (8) in view of the evolving nature of fishery resources in the wcpf convention area and the consequent need for the position of the union to take account of new developments, including new scientific and other relevant information presented before or during the meetings of the wcpfc, procedures should be established, in line with the principle of sincere cooperation among the union institutions enshrined in article 13(2) of the treaty on european union, for the year-to-year specification of the union position for the period 2019-2023, has adopted this decision: article 1 the position to be taken on the union's behalf in the meetings of the western and central pacific fisheries commission (wcpfc) is set out in annex i. article 2 the year-to-year specification of the union's position to be taken in the meetings of the wcpfc shall be conducted in accordance with annex ii. article 3 the union's position set out in annex i shall be assessed and, where appropriate, revised by the council upon a proposal from the commission, at the latest for the annual meeting of the wcpfc in 2024. article 4 the council decision of 12 june 2014 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the european union, for the conservation and management of highly migratory fish stocks in the western and central pacific fisheries commission (wcpfc) is hereby repealed. article 5 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at brussels, 14 may 2019. for the council the president p. daea (1) council decision 2005/75/ec of 26 april 2004 on the accession of the community to the convention on the conservation and management of highly migratory fish stocks in the western and central pacific ocean (oj l 32, 4.2.2005, p. 1). (2) oj l 32, 4.2.2005, p. 3. (3) regulation (eu) no 1380/2013 of the european parliament and of the council of 11 december 2013 on the common fisheries policy, amending council regulations (ec) no 1954/2003 and (ec) no 1224/2009 and repealing council regulations (ec) no 2371/2002 and (ec) no 639/2004 and council decision 2004/585/ec (oj l 354, 28.12.2013, p. 22). (4) council regulation (ec) no 1005/2008 of 29 september 2008 establishing a community system to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing, amending regulations (eec) no 2847/93, (ec) no 1936/2001 and (ec) no 601/2004 and repealing regulations (ec) no 1093/94 and (ec) no 1447/1999 (oj l 286, 29.10.2008, p. 1). (5) council regulation (ec) no 1224/2009 of 20 november 2009 establishing a union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy, amending regulations (ec) no 847/96, (ec) no 2371/2002, (ec) no 811/2004, (ec) no 768/2005, (ec) no 2115/2005, (ec) no 2166/2005, (ec) no 388/2006, (ec) no 509/2007, (ec) no 676/2007, (ec) no 1098/2007, (ec) no 1300/2008, (ec) no 1342/2008 and repealing regulations (eec) no 2847/93, (ec) no 1627/94 and (ec) no 1966/2006 (oj l 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1). (6) regulation (eu) 2017/2403 of the european parliament and of the council of 12 december 2017 on the sustainable management of external fishing fleets, and repealing council regulation (ec) no 1006/2008 (oj l 347, 28.12.2017, p. 81). annex i the position to be taken on the union's behalf in the western and central pacific fisheries commission (wcpfc) 1. principles in the framework of the wcpfc, the union shall: a) act in accordance with the objectives and principles pursued by the union within the common fisheries policy (cfp), notably through the precautionary approach and the aims related to the maximum sustainable yield as laid down in article 2(2) of regulation (eu) no 1380/2013, to promote the implementation of an ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management, to avoid and reduce, as far as possible, unwanted catches, and gradually eliminate discards, and to minimise the impact of fishing activities on marine ecosystems and their habitats, as well as, through the promotion of economically viable and competitive union fisheries, to provide a fair standard of living or those who depend on fishing activities and take account of the interests of consumers; b) work towards an appropriate involvement of stakeholders in the preparation phase for wcpfc measures and ensure that measures adopted within the wcpfc are in accordance with the wcpf convention; c) ensure that measures adopted within the wcpfc are consistent with international law, and in particular with the provisions of the 1982 un convention on the law of the sea, the 1995 un agreement relating to the conservation and management of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks, the 1993 agreement to promote compliance with international conservation and management measures by fishing vessels on the high seas; and the 2009 food and agriculture organization port state measures agreement; d) promote positions consistent with the best practices of regional fisheries management organisations (rfmos) in the same area; e) seek consistency and synergy with the policy that the union is pursuing as part of its bilateral fisheries relations with third countries, and ensure coherence with its other policies notably in the field of external relations, employment, environment, trade, development, research and innovation; f) ensure that the union's international commitments are respected; g) be in line with the council conclusions of 19 march 2012 on the commission communication on the external dimension of the common fisheries policy (1); h) aim to create a level playing field for the union fleet within the convention area based on the same principles and standards as those applicable under union law, and to promote the uniform implementation of those principles and standards; i) be in line with the council conclusions (2) on the joint communication by the high representative of the union for foreign affairs and security policy and the european commission on international ocean governance: an agenda for the future of oceans (3) and promote measures to support and enhance the effectiveness of the wcpfc and, where relevant, improve its governance and performance (in particular as regards science, compliance, transparency and decision-making) as a contribution to the sustainable management of oceans in all its dimensions; j) promote coordination between rfmos and regional sea conventions (rscs) and cooperation with global organisations, as applicable, within their mandates, where appropriate; k) developing, where appropriate, common approaches with other rfmos, in particular those involved in fisheries management in the same area; l) promote coordination and cooperation with other tuna rfmos on issues of common interest, notably via the reactivation of the so-called kobe process for tuna rfmos and its extension to all rfmos. 2. orientations the union shall, where appropriate, endeavour to support the adoption of the following actions by the wcpfc: a) conservation and management measures for fisheries resources in the wcpf convention area based on the best scientific advice available, including total allowable catches (tacs) and quotas, fishing effort or fishing capacity measures for living marine biological resources regulated by the wcpfc, which would bring or maintain the achievement of the maximum sustainable yield exploitation rate at the latest by 2020. where necessary, those conservation and management measures shall include specific measures for stocks which suffer from overfishing to keep the fishing pressure in line with available fishing opportunities; b) measures to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated (iuu) fishing activities in the convention area, including iuu vessel listing; c) measures to reinforce fisheries' scientific data collection and promote better cooperation between the industry and scientists; d) monitoring, control and surveillance measures in the wcpf convention area in order to ensure efficiency of control and compliance with measures adopted within the wcpfc; e) measures to minimise the negative impact of fishing activities on marine biodiversity and marine ecosystems and their habitats, including measures to reduce marine pollution and prevent the discharge of plastics at sea and reduce the impact on marine biodiversity and ecosystems of plastics present at sea, protective measures for sensitive marine ecosystems in the wcpf convention area in line with the wcpf convention, and measures to avoid and reduce as far as possible unwanted catches, including in particular vulnerable marine species, and to gradually eliminate discards; f) measures to manage the use of fish aggregating devices (fads) notably to improve collection of data, to accurately quantify, track and monitor fads use, to reduce impact on vulnerable tuna stocks, to mitigate their potential effects on target and non-target species, as well as on the ecosystem; g) measures to reduce the impact of abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded fishing gear (aldfg) in the ocean and to facilitate the identification and recovery of such gear and to reduce the contribution to marine debris; h) measures aimed at the prohibition of fisheries conducted solely for the purpose of harvesting shark fins and requiring that all sharks are landed with all fins naturally attached; i) recommendations, where appropriate and to the extent permitted under the relevant constituent documents, encouraging the implementation of the work in fishing convention of the international labour organisation (ilo); j) additional technical measures based on advice from the subsidiary bodies and working groups of the wcpfc. (1) 7087/12 rev 1 add 1 cor 1. (2) 7348/1/17 rev 1 of 24.3.2017. (3) join(2016) 49 final of 10.11.2016. annex ii year to year specification of the union's position to be taken at meetings of the western and central pacific fisheries commission before each meeting of the wcpfc, when that body is called upon to adopt decisions having legal effects on the union, the necessary steps shall be taken so that the position to be expressed on the union's behalf takes account of the latest scientific and other relevant information transmitted to the european commission, in accordance with the principles and orientations set out in annex i. to this effect, and based on that information, the european commission shall transmit to the council in sufficient time before each meeting of the wcpfc, a written document setting out the particulars of the proposed specification of the union position for discussion and endorsement of the details of the position to be expressed on the union's behalf. if in the course of a wcfpc meeting it is impossible to reach an agreement, including on the spot, in order for the union's position to take account of new elements, the matter shall be referred to the council or its preparatory bodies.

name: commission decision (eu) 2019/847 of 15 may 2019 on the proposed citizens' initiative entitled save the bees! protection of biodiversity and improvement of habitats for insects in europe (notified under document c(2019) 3800) type: decision subject matter: environmental policy; natural environment; european construction; agricultural activity; parliament date published: 2019-05-24 24.5.2019 en official journal of the european union l 138/90 commission decision (eu) 2019/847 of 15 may 2019 on the proposed citizens' initiative entitled save the bees! protection of biodiversity and improvement of habitats for insects in europe (notified under document c(2019) 3800) (only the german text is authentic) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to regulation (eu) no 211/2011 of the european parliament and of the council of 16 february 2011 on the citizens' initiative (1), and in particular article 4 thereof, whereas: (1) the subject matter of the proposed citizens' initiative entitled save the bees! protection of biodiversity and improvement of habitats for insects in europe refers to the following: we need insects for our ecosystems and to ensure food security. the commission must adopt legislation to maintain and improve habitats for insects as indicators of an undamaged environment. (2) the objectives of the proposed citizens' initiative refer to the following: to demonstrably improve the natural basis for life we call for mandatory targets: to make the promotion of biodiversity an overall objective of the cap; to dramatically cut the use of pesticides, ban harmful pesticides without exception and reform eligibility criteria; to promote structural diversity in agricultural landscapes; to effectively reduce nutrients (e.g. natura 2000); to effectively establish conservation areas (e.g. wfd); to intensify research and monitoring and improve education. (3) the treaty on european union (teu) reinforces citizenship of the union and enhances further the democratic functioning of the union by providing, inter alia, that every citizen is to have the right to participate in the democratic life of the union by way of a european citizens' initiative. (4) to this end, the procedures and conditions required for the citizens' initiative should be clear, simple, user-friendly and proportionate to the nature of the citizens' initiative so as to encourage participation by citizens and to make the union more accessible. (5) legal acts of the union for the purpose of implementing the treaties can be adopted: for the establishment of the common organisation of agricultural markets and the other provisions necessary for the pursuit of the objectives of the common agricultural policy, on the basis of article 43(2) of the treaty on the functioning of the european union (tfeu); for approximation of the provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in member states which have as their object the establishment and functioning of the internal market, on the basis of article 114 tfeu; for measures in the veterinary and phytosanitary fields which have as their direct objective the protection of public health, on the basis of article 168(4)(b) tfeu; for the adoption of a multiannual framework programme setting out all the activities of the union in the field of research and technological development, on the basis of article 182(1) tfeu; for action to be taken to achieve the objectives of preserving, protecting and improving the quality of the environment and of a prudent and rational utilisation of natural resources, on the basis of article 192(1) tfeu, read in conjunction with article 191(1), first and third indents tfeu. (6) for these reasons, the proposed citizens' initiative does not manifestly fall outside the framework of the commission's powers to submit a proposal for a legal act of the union for the purpose of implementing the treaties in accordance with article 4(2)(b) of the regulation. (7) furthermore, the citizens' committee has been formed and the contact persons have been designated in accordance with article 3(2) of the regulation and the proposed citizens' initiative is neither manifestly abusive, frivolous or vexatious nor manifestly contrary to the values of the union as set out in article 2 teu. (8) the proposed citizens' initiative entitled save the bees! protection of biodiversity and improvement of habitats for insects in europe should therefore be registered, has adopted this decision: article 1 the proposed citizens' initiative entitled save the bees! protection of biodiversity and improvement of habitats for insects in europe is hereby registered. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on 27 may 2019. article 3 this decision is addressed to the organisers (members of the citizens' committee) of the proposed citizens' initiative entitled save the bees! protection of biodiversity and improvement of habitats for insects in europe, represented by ms manuela ripa and ms clara borasio acting as contact persons. done at brussels, 15 may 2019. for the commission frans timmermans first vice-president (1) oj l 65, 11.3.2011, p. 1.

name: council decision (eu) 2019/844 of 14 may 2019 on the exercise of powers by the secretary-general of the council as regards complaints submitted to the council by candidates for the position of european chief prosecutor type: decision subject matter: eu institutions and european civil service; organisation of the legal system date published: 2019-05-24 24.5.2019 en official journal of the european union l 138/82 council decision (eu) 2019/844 of 14 may 2019 on the exercise of powers by the secretary-general of the council as regards complaints submitted to the council by candidates for the position of european chief prosecutor the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to council implementing decision (eu) 2018/1696 of 13 july 2018 on the operating rules of the selection panel provided for in article 14(3) of regulation (eu) 2017/1939 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the european public prosecutor's office (the eppo) (1), and in particular rules vi.1 and vii.1 of the annex thereto, having regard to the staff regulations of officials of the european union and the conditions of employment of other servants of the european union, laid down in council regulation (eec, euratom, ecsc) no 259/68 (2) (the staff regulations), and in particular article 2 and article 90(2) thereof, whereas: (1) pursuant to rule vi.1 of the annex to implementing decision (eu) 2018/1696 (the operating rules of the selection panel), candidates who are excluded from the selection procedure for the appointment of the european chief prosecutor may submit a complaint within the meaning of article 90(2) of the staff regulations to the council. (2) pursuant to rule vii.1 of the operating rules of the selection panel, candidates who are not included in the shortlist of qualified candidates drawn up by the selection panel for the appointment of the european chief prosecutor may submit a complaint within the meaning of article 90(2) of the staff regulations to the council. (3) article 2 of the staff regulations requires each institution to determine who within it is to exercise the powers conferred by the staff regulations, which include the powers of the appointing authority provided for in article 90(2) thereof. (4) in accordance with the first subparagraph of article 240(2) of the treaty on the functioning of the european union, the council is assisted by a general secretariat, under the responsibility of a secretary-general. (5) the powers of the appointing authority, as regards complaints within the meaning of article 90(2) of the staff regulations submitted to the council by candidates in the selection procedure for the appointment of the european chief prosecutor pursuant to rules vi.1 and vii.1 of the operating rules of the selection panel, should be exercised by the secretary-general of the council, has adopted this decision: article 1 the powers conferred by article 90(2) of the staff regulations on the appointing authority, as regards complaints submitted to the council pursuant to rules vi.1 or vii.1 of the operating rules of the selection panel by candidates who are excluded from the selection procedure or are not included in the shortlist of qualified candidates drawn up by the selection panel for the appointment of the european chief prosecutor, shall be exercised by the secretary-general of the council on behalf and under the responsibility of the council. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at brussels, 14 may 2019. for the council the president p. daea (1) oj l 282, 12.11.2018, p. 8. (2) oj l 56, 4.3.1968, p. 1.

name: council decision (cfsp) 2019/806 of 17 may 2019 amending decision 2013/255/cfsp concerning restrictive measures against syria type: decision subject matter: international affairs; civil law; asia and oceania; european construction date published: 2019-05-20 20.5.2019 en official journal of the european union l 132/36 council decision (cfsp) 2019/806 of 17 may 2019 amending decision 2013/255/cfsp concerning restrictive measures against syria the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on european union, and in particular article 29 thereof, having regard to the proposal from the high representative of the union for foreign affairs and security policy, whereas: (1) on 31 may 2013 the council adopted decision 2013/255/cfsp (1). (2) on 28 may 2018 the council adopted decision (cfsp) 2018/778 (2), extending the restrictive measures set out in decision 2013/255/cfsp until 1 june 2019. (3) on the basis of a review, the council decided that the restrictive measures should be extended until 1 june 2020. (4) the entries for 59 persons subject to restrictive measures as set out in annex i to decision 2013/255/cfsp should be amended. (5) nine entries should be deleted from the list of designated persons and entities. (6) following the judgments of the general court of 31 january 2019 in case t-667/17, alkarim for trade and industry v council, and in case t-559/17, abdulkarim v council, alkarim for trade and industry and mouhamad wael abdulkarim are not included in the list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies subject to restrictive measures in annex i to decision 2013/255/cfsp. (7) decision 2013/255/cfsp should therefore be amended accordingly, has adopted this decision: article 1 decision 2013/255/cfsp is amended as follows: (1) article 34 is replaced by the following: article 34 this decision shall apply until 1 june 2020. it shall be kept under constant review. it may be renewed, or amended as appropriate, if the council deems that its objectives have not been met.; (2) annex i is amended as set out in the annex to this decision. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at brussels, 17 may 2019. for the council the president e.o. teodorovici (1) council decision 2013/255/cfsp of 31 may 2013 concerning restrictive measures against syria (oj l 147, 1.6.2013, p. 14). (2) council decision (cfsp) 2018/778 of 28 may 2018 amending decision 2013/255/cfsp concerning restrictive measures against syria (oj l 131, 29.5.2018, p. 16) annex annex i to decision 2013/255/cfsp is amended as follows: (1) part a (persons) is amended as follows: (a) the following entries replace the corresponding entries in the list: name identifying information reasons date of listing 6. muhammad ( ) dib ( ) zaytun ( ) (a.k.a. mohammed dib zeitoun; a.k.a. mohamed dib zeitun) date of birth: 20.5.1951; place of birth: jubba, damascus province, syria; diplomatic passport no d000001300; gender: male head of general security directorate; involved in violence against demonstrators. 9.5.2011 7. amjad ( ) abbas ( ) (a.k.a. al-abbas) gender: male former head of political security in banyas, involved in violence against demonstrators in baida. promoted to the rank of colonel in 2018. 9.5.2011 10. jamil ( ) (a.k.a. jameel) hassan ( ) (a.k.a. al-hassan) date of birth: 7.7.1953; place of birth: qusayr, homs province, syria; head of syrian air force intelligence; gender: male officer of the rank of major-general in the syrian air force in post after may 2011. head of syrian air force intelligence in post after may 2011. responsible for violent repression against the civilian population in syria. 9.5.2011 14. brigadier general mohammed bilal (a.k.a. lieutenant colonel muhammad bilal) gender: male as a senior officer in the air force intelligence service of syria, he supports the syrian regime and he is responsible for the violent repression against the civilian population. he is also associated with the listed scientific studies research centre (ssrc). head of tartus police since december 2018. 21.10.2014 20. bassam ( ) al hassan ( ) (a.k.a. al hasan) born: 1961 gender: male presidential advisor for strategic affairs; involved in violence against the civilian population. 23.5.2011 31. major general tawfiq ( ) (a.k.a. tawfik) younes ( ) (a.k.a. yunes) gender: male former head of the department for internal security of the general intelligence directorate; involved in violence against the civilian population. 1.8.2011 36. nizar ( ) al-asaad ( ) (a.k.a. nizar asaad) gender: male leading syrian businessperson with close ties to the regime. cousin of bashar al-assad, and associated with the assad and makhlouf families. as such, has been participating in, benefitting from or otherwise supporting the syrian regime. leading oil investor and previously head of the nizar oilfield supplies company. 23.8.2011 41. ali ( ) douba ( ) born: 1933; place of birth: karfis, syria; gender: male special advisor to president al-assad. as special advisor, participates in, benefits from, and supports the assad regime. has been involved in violently repressing the civilian population in syria. 23.8.2011 48. samir ( ) hassan ( ) gender: male leading businessperson operating in syria, with interests and/or activities in multiple sectors of syria's economy. he holds interests in and/or has significant influence in the amir group and cham holdings, two conglomerates with interests in the real estate, tourism, transport and finance sectors. from march 2014 until september 2018, he held the position of chairman for russia of the bilateral business councils following his appointment by minister of economy, khodr orfali. samir hassan supports the regime's war effort with cash donations. samir hassan is associated with persons benefitting from or supporting the regime. in particular, he is associated with rami makhlouf and issam anbouba, who have been designated by the council and benefit from the syrian regime. 27.9.2014 49. fares ( ) chehabi ( ) (a.k.a. fares shihabi; fares chihabi) son of ahmad chehabi; date of birth: 7.5.1972; gender: male president of aleppo chamber of industry; chairman of the federation of chambers of industry since 16.12.2018. vice-chairman of cham holding. provides economic support to the syrian regime. member of syrian parliament since 2016. 2.9.2011 51. issam ( ) anbouba ( ) president of anbouba for agricultural industries co.; born: 1952; place of birth: homs, syria; gender: male providing financial support for the repressive apparatus and the paramilitary groups exerting violence against the civil population in syria. providing property (premises, warehouses) for improvised detention centers. financial relations with high syrian officials. co-founder and member of the board of cham holding. 2.9.2011 55. colonel lu'ai ( ) (a.k.a. louay, loai) al-ali ( ) place of birth: jablah, latakia province; gender: male head of syrian military intelligence, dara'a branch. responsible for the violence against protesters in dara'a. 14.11.2011 78. major general ali ( ) barakat ( ) gender: male 103rd brigade of the republican guard division. military official involved in the violence in homs. promoted to major general in 2017. 1.12.2011 79. major general talal ( ) makhluf ( ) (a.k.a. makhlouf) gender: male former commander of the 105th brigade of the republican guards. former commander general of the republican guards. current commander of the 2nd corps. member of the syrian armed forces of the rank of major general in post after may 2011. military official involved in the violence in damascus. 1.12.2011 99. major general mohamed ( ) (a.k.a. mohammad, muhammad, mohammed) khaddor ( ) (a.k.a. khaddour, khaddur, khadour, khudour) commander of the 106th brigade, presidential guard; gender: male gave orders to troops to beat the protesters with sticks and then arrest them. responsible for repression of peaceful protestors in douma. 23.1.2012 104. mohamed ( ) (a.k.a. mohammad, muhammad, mohammed) heikmat ( ) (a.k.a. hikmat, hekmat) ibrahim ( ) gender: male as former head of the operations branch of the political security directorate, was responsible for detention and torture of detainees. 23.1.2012 128. brigadier general burhan ( ) qadour ( ) (a.k.a. qaddour, qaddur) gender: male former head of branch 291 (damascus) of the army's intelligence service. responsible for the torture of opponents in custody. 24.7.2012 135. brigadier general suhail ( ) (a.k.a. suheil) al-abdullah ( ) (a.k.a. al-abdallah) gender: male head of the latakia branch of the air force's intelligence service. responsible for the torture of opponents in custody. 24.7.2012 139. major general hussam ( ) (a.k.a. husam, housam, houssam) luqa ( ) (a.k.a. louqa, louca, louka, luka) born: 1964; place of birth: damascus; gender: male from april 2012 to 2.12.2018, was head of the homs branch of the political security directorate (succeeded brig. gen. nasr al-ali). since 3.12.2018, head of the political security directorate. responsible for the torture of opponents in custody. 24.7.2012 144. ahmed ( ) (a.k.a. ahmad) al-jarroucheh ( ) (a.k.a. al-jarousha, al-jarousheh, al-jaroucha, al-jarouchah, al-jaroucheh) born: 1957; gender: male former head of the foreign branch of general intelligence (branch 279). as such, responsible for general intelligence arrangements in syrian embassies. 24.7.2012 160. dr. hazwan ( ) al wez ( ) (a.k.a. al wazz) gender: male former minister of education, appointed in july 2016. as a former government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 16.10.2012 188. bishr riyad yazigi born: 1972; gender: male advisor to the president of syria. former minister of tourism. as a former government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 24.6.2014 211. hilal hilal (a.k.a. hilal al-hilal) ( ) born: 1966; gender: male member of the regime-affiliated militias known as kataeb al-baath (the baath party militia). vice-chairman of the baath party. supports the regime through his role in the recruitment and organisation of the baath party militia. 28.10.2016 213. bishr al-sabban (a.k.a mohammed bishr al-sabban; bishr mazin al-sabban) born: 1966; place of birth: damascus, syrian arab republic; gender: male former governor of damascus, who was appointed by, and is associated with, bashar al-assad. supports the regime and is responsible for the violent repression against the civilian population in syria, including engaging in discriminatory practices against sunni communities within the capital. 28.10.2016 214. ahmad sheik abdul-qader (a.k.a ahmad sheikh abdul qadir; ahmad al-sheik abdulquader) () gender: male former governor of quneitra, associated with and appointed by bashar al-assad. previously governor of latakia. supports and benefits from the regime, including by public support for the syrian armed forces and pro-regime militia. 28.10.2016 215. dr ghassan omar khalaf ( ) gender: male former governor of hama, who was appointed by, and is associated with, bashar al-assad. he also supports and benefits from the regime. ghassan omar khalaf is closely associated with members of a regime-affiliated militia in hama known as the hama brigade. 28.10.2016 216. khayr al-din al-sayyed (a.k.a khayr al-din abdul-sattar al-sayyed; mohamed khair al-sayyed; kheredden al-sayyed; khairuddin as-sayyed; khaireddin al-sayyed; kheir eddin al-sayyed; kheir eddib asayed) ( ) gender: male former governor of idlib, associated with and appointed by bashar al-assad. benefits from and supports the regime, including by providing support for syrian armed forces and pro-regime militia. associated with the regime's minister of awqaf, dr mohammad abdul-sattar al-sayyed, who is his brother. 28.10.2016 217. atef naddaf ( ) born: 1956; place of birth: damascus countryside; gender: male minister of internal trade and consumer protection. appointed in november 2018. as government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 14.11.2016 218. hussein makhlouf (a.k.a. makhluf) ( ) born: 1964; place of birth: lattakia; gender: male local administration minister. appointed in july 2016. former governor of damascus governorate. as government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. cousin of rami makhlouf. 14.11.2016 219. ali al-zafir ( ) born: 1962; place of birth: tartus; gender: male former minister of communications and technology. as a former government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 14.11.2016 220. ali ghanem ( ) born: 1963; place of birth: damascus; gender: male minister for petroleum and mineral resources. appointed in july 2016. as government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 14.11.2016 222. mohammed (a.k.a. mohamed, muhammad, mohammad) al-ahmed (a.k.a. al-ahmad) ( ) born: 1961; place of birth: lattakia; gender: male culture minister. appointed in july 2016. as government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 14.11.2016 223. ali hamoud (a.k.a. hammoud) ( ) born: 1964; place of birth: tartus; gender: male transport minister. appointed in july 2016. as government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 14.11.2016 224. mohammed zuhair (a.k.a. zahir) kharboutli ( ) place of birth: damascus; gender: male electricity minister. appointed in july 2016. as government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 14.11.2016 225. maamoun (a.k.a. ma'moun) hamdan ( ) born: 1958; place of birth: damascus; gender: male finance minister. appointed in july 2016. as government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 14.11.2016 226. nabil al-hasan (a.k.a. al-hassan) ( ) born: 1963; place of birth: aleppo; gender: male former minister of water resources. appointed in july 2016. as a former government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 14.11.2016 228. abdullah al-gharbi (a.k.a. al-qirbi) ( ) born: 1962; place of birth: damascus; gender: male former minister of internal trade and consumer protection. appointed in july 2016. as a former government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 14.11.2016 229. abdullah abdullah ( ) born: 1956; gender: male state minister. appointed in july 2016. as government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 14.11.2016 230. salwa abdullah ( ) born: 1953; place of birth: quneitra; gender: female state minister. appointed in july 2016. as government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 14.11.2016 231. rafe'a abu sa'ad (a.k.a. saad) ( ) born: 1954; place of birth: habran village (sweida province); gender: male state minister. appointed in july 2016. as government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 14.11.2016 232. wafiqa hosni ( ) born: 1952; place of birth: damascus; gender: female state minister. appointed in july 2016. as government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 14.11.2016 233. rima al-qadiri (a.k.a. al-kadiri) ( ) born: 1963; place of birth: damascus; gender: female minister for social affairs (since august 2015). as government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 14.11.2016 234. duraid durgham gender: male former governor of the central bank of syria. was responsible for providing economic and financial support to the syrian regime through his functions as the governor of the central bank of syria, which is also listed. 14.11.2016 243. ali wanus (a.k.a.: ali wannous) () date of birth: 5.2.1964; title: major general; gender: male holds the rank of major general, in post after may 2011. as a senior military officer he is responsible for the violent repression against the civilian population and involved in the storage and deployment of chemical weapons. he is also associated with the syrian scientific studies and research centre, a listed entity. 18.7.2017 258. mohamed mazen ali yousef ( ) date of birth: 17.5.1969; place of birth: damascus countryside; gender: male former minister of industry. appointed in january 2018. as a former government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 26.2.2018 265. jamal eddin mohammed nazer (a.k.a. ; nazir ahmad, mohammed jamaleddine) gender: male; position: cofounder and majority shareholder of apex development and projects llc and founder of a'ayan company for projects and equipment; date of birth: 2.1.1962; place of birth: damascus, syrian arab republic; nationality: syrian; passport number: n 011612445, issue no. 002-17-l022286 (place of issue: syrian arab republic); id number: 010-30208342 (place of issue: syrian arab republic) leading businessperson operating in syria with significant investments in the construction industry, including a controlling 90 % stake in apex development and projects llc, which has entered into a usd 34,8 million joint venture for the construction of marota city, a regime-backed luxury residential and commercial development. through his participation in the marota city development, jamal eddin mohammed nazer benefits from and/or supports the syrian regime. 21.1.2019 272. hayan kaddour (a.k.a. hayyan kaddour bin mohammed nazem; hayan mohammad nazem qaddour) gender: male; position: primary shareholder of exceed development and investment company; date of birth: 14.7.1970 or 24.7.1970; place of birth: damascus, syrian arab republic; nationality: syrian, swiss; passport number: no x4662433 (place of issue: switzerland); n 004599905 (place of issue: syrian arab republic) leading businessperson operating in syria, who holds a 67 % stake in exceed development and investment, which has entered into a usd 17,7 million joint venture for the construction of marota city, a regime-backed luxury residential and commercial development. through his participation in the marota city development, hayan mohammad nazem qaddour benefits from and/or supports the syrian regime. 21.1.2019 275. major general mohammad khaled al-rahmoun born: 1957; place of birth: idleb; gender: male minister of interior. appointed in november 2018. as government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 4.3.2019 276. mohammad rami radwan martini born: 1970; place of birth: aleppo; gender: male minister of tourism. appointed in november 2018. as government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 4.3.2019 277. imad muwaffaq al-azab born: 1970; place of birth: damascus countryside; gender: male minister of education. appointed in november 2018. as government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 4.3.2019 278. bassam bashir ibrahim born: 1960; place of birth: hama; gender: male minister of higher education. appointed in november 2018. as government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 4.3.2019 279. suhail mohammad abdullatif born: 1961; place of birth: lattakia; gender: male minister of public works and housing. appointed in november 2018. as government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 4.3.2019 280. iyad mohammad al-khatib born: 1974; place of birth: damascus; gender: male minister of communications and technology. appointed in november 2018. as government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 4.3.2019 281. mohammad maen zein-al-abidin jazba born: 1962; place of birth: aleppo; gender: male minister of industry. appointed in november 2018. as government minister, shares responsibility for the regime's violent repression against the civilian population. 4.3.2019 (b) the following entries are deleted: 75. lt. general fahid al-jassim; 88. brigadier general ahmed yousef jarad; 97. brigadier general mohsin makhlouf; 100. major general suheil salman hassan; 168. omran ahed al zu'bi; 174. mohammed turki al sayed; 249. isam zahr al-din; (c) entries 264 to 269 are renumbered as follows: name of person current entry number new entry number anas talas 264 282 jamal eddin mohammed nazer 265 283 mazin al-tarazi 266 284 samer foz 267 285 khaldoun al-zoubi 268 286 hussam al-qatirji 269 287 (2) in part b (entities), the following entries are deleted: 51. drex technologies holding s.a; 70. dk group.

name: commission decision (eu) 2019/767 of 31 july 2018 on state aid sa.36511 (2014/c) (ex 2013/nn) caps applied by france to the cspe surcharge (notified under document c(2018) 4975) (text with eea relevance.) type: decision subject matter: europe; electrical and nuclear industries; soft energy; construction and town planning; energy policy; competition; economic policy; consumption date published: 2019-05-15 15.5.2019 en official journal of the european union l 126/20 commission decision (eu) 2019/767 of 31 july 2018 on state aid sa.36511 (2014/c) (ex 2013/nn) caps applied by france to the cspe surcharge (notified under document c(2018) 4975) (only the french text is authentic) (text with eea relevance) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular the first subparagraph of article 108(2) thereof, having regard to the agreement on the european economic area, and in particular article 62(1)(a) thereof, having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to those articles (1), and having regard to their comments, whereas: 1. procedure (1) on 11 october 2013, following preliminary contacts between the commission departments and france in the course of 2013, france notified its onshore wind support scheme, which had been funded up to then by an electricity surcharge known as the contribution to the public electricity service (contribution au service public de l' lectricit cspe). (2) as the scheme had entered into force prior to notification, on 29 november 2013 the case was transferred to the register of non-notified aid. (3) by letter of 27 march 2014, the commission informed france that it had no objections to support for onshore wind, but that it had doubts about the compatibility with the internal market of the reductions in the cspe granted to self-generating consumers, large electricity consumers and electro-intensive consumers. consequently, it informed france that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in article 108(2) of the treaty on the functioning of the european union (tfeu) in respect of these cspe reductions. (4) the commission's decision to initiate the procedure (the opening decision) was published in the official journal of the european union. the commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measures in question and on the possible application to the cspe reductions of the guidelines on state aid for environmental protection and energy 2014-2020 (the 2014 guidelines) (2). (5) the commission received comments from five interested parties: (i) air liquide, by letter of 3 november 2014; (ii) edf, by letter of 17 november 2014; (iii) the ratp, by letter of 2 december 2014; (iv) the sncf, by letter of 3 december 2014, and (v) the union des industries utilisatrices d' nergie (uniden), by letter of 3 november 2014. these comments concerned, on the one hand, the existence of state aid and, on the other hand, the compliance of the measures with the tfeu and also with the 2014 guidelines. (6) france submitted its comments through a memorandum of 5 may 2014, supplemented by a memorandum of 22 october 2015. in this correspondence, after recapping the various cspe reductions, france firstly asserted that the cspe reductions enjoyed by self-generating consumers did not constitute aid. it then stated that the cap on the cspe per site and the cap on the cspe of 0,5 % of value added were compatible with the state aid rules. (7) during the formal investigation, the commission sent seven requests for information between 21 august 2014 and 27 october 2017. the french authorities in turn submitted 11 memoranda and information documents between 7 may 2014 and 12 december 2017. these exchanges of information concerned (i) clarification of the amounts paid in cspe and reductions granted to certain types of beneficiary, (ii) the classification of the measures as state aid and legal analysis of their compliance with the state aid rules, and (iii) the presentation of an adjustment plan intended to lower the reductions in cspe to levels compatible with the applicable state aid rules. the first adjustment plan proposed was presented in the memorandum of 4 november 2014 and was finalised in the memorandum of 23 november 2017. 2. description of the measures (8) this section outlines the cspe surcharge and the reductions in it granted for the period 2003-2015. it is the reductions that are the subject of this decision. 2.1. presentation of the cspe (9) the cspe surcharge was introduced by law no 2003-8 of 3 january 2003 on the gas and electricity markets and on the public energy service (loi no 2003-8 du 3 janvier 2003 relative aux march s du gaz et de l' lectricit et au service public de l' nergie), law no 2003-8). the scheme described in this decision predates the 2016 cspe reform introduced by amending finance law for 2015 no 2015-1786 of 29 december 2015 (loi no 2015-1786 du 29 d cembre 2015 de finances rectificative pour 2015, lfr 2015). (10) the cspe was intended to offset the extra costs associated with the public electricity service tasks borne by the incumbent electricity suppliers (edf and local distribution companies). these extra costs stem mainly from the funding of four types of policy: (a) they derive firstly from an obligation imposed on edf or local distribution companies (entreprises locales de distribution, eld) to purchase electricity generated by certain types of plant producing electricity from renewable energy sources (wind, photovoltaic, etc.). this component accounted for 39 % of the cspe collected over the entire duration of the measures, i.e. 2003-2015. (b) they also derive from the funding of high-efficiency cogeneration, which accounted for 25 % of the cspe collected over the 2003-2015 period. in its memorandum of 20 december 2016, france stated that the cspe was intended only to fund high-efficiency cogeneration. france there stated that this support had first taken the form of a purchase contract scheme applied between 1997 and 2001, which remunerated cogeneration facilities with an energy efficiency in excess of 65 %, and had subsequently taken the form of assistance, from 2013, for high-efficiency natural gas cogeneration facilities of more than 12 mw. (c) the extra costs further arise out of compensation given to electricity generators in non-interconnected areas (corsica or overseas departments) so that in the electricity price paid by the final consumer the generators do not pass on the difference between the generation costs they have to bear and the generation costs borne in mainland france, which are lower because they incorporate the lower cost of nuclear energy. this item accounted for 31 % of the total cspe collected over the entire period in question, i.e. 2003-2015. the system for keeping electricity prices in corsica and in the overseas departments equivalent to prices applied in mainland france is otherwise known as tariff equalisation (p r quation tarifaire). (d) three per cent of these extra costs stem from implementing the social tariff known as the tariff for electricity as a basic necessity (produit de premi re n cessit ), and from covering some of the costs borne by electricity suppliers due to their financial participation in the scheme to help people living in poverty. (11) the commission notes that, in addition to these policies other policies were also funded out of the cspe, albeit to a lesser extent. these measures accounted for less than 2 % of the cspe collected. they mainly involved the following: (1) support granted between 2003 and 2015 to plants generating electricity by incinerating household waste. edf and local distribution companies were under an obligation at the time to purchase the electricity generated by these plants at a price set by ministerial order. the extra costs borne by these operators were offset out of the cspe. france considers that the proportion of renewable energy generated by these plants was 50 %, in accordance with the rules of the international energy agency (iea) and eurostat on energy statistics. (2) support for peak-demand facilities contributing to security of supply. these facilities are powered mainly by diesel and were built in the 1990s. they are called upon for a limited number of hours depending on the needs of the electricity system. (3) support for various measures (eur 221 million over the 2003-2015 period): firstly, funding of firm capacity contracts to encourage independent generation (electricity generating facilities with an output less than 8 000 kva, facilities designed to use the calorific value of urban waste), presented by france as being a useful addition to the public electricity service; secondly, funding of purchase contracts for the output of various generators. (12) article l.121-7 of the energy code (code de l' nergie) provides that costs attributable to public electricity service tasks are to be offset by contributions payable by final consumers of electricity established in the national territory. all these items therefore represent a single extra cost for french consumers. the contribution was paid by all final consumers of electricity in proportion to the kilowatt-hours (kwh) consumed, including by electricity self-generators. between 2003 and 2015, the cspe changed as follows: changes in the amount of cspe collected - 2003-2015 (eur/mwh) 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 cspe 3,0 3,3 4,5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4,5 4,5 9,0 10,5 13,5 16,5 19,5 source: french court of auditors (cour des comptes) report 2017. (13) where an eligible final consumer had exercised the rights granted in article 22(iii) of law no 2000-108 of 10 february 2000 on the modernisation and development of the public electricity service (loi no 2000-108 du 10 f vrier 2000 relative la modernisation et au d veloppement du service public de l' lectricit , law no 2000-108), and was supplied through the public transmission network or through a public distribution network, the consumer's contributions were collected by the operator responsible for the management of the network to which the consumer was connected, by way of a levy additional to the network usage tariff. (14) the contributions collected by that operator were paid to the operators that bore the costs of the public service through the caisse des d p 'ts et consignations (cdc). the cdc paid out this contribution, four times a year, to those operators that bore the costs that the sums collected were intended to offset. on 1 january each year, it paid the national energy ombudsman a sum equal to the amount of its budget. (15) the cdc recorded these various transactions in a special account. the management fees incurred by the cdc were determined annually by the ministers for the economy and for energy. where the sum of the contributions collected did not correspond to the total costs recorded for the year, an adjustment was made the following year through the contributions payable for that year. if the sums payable were not collected in the course of the year, they were added to the amount of the charges for the following year (3). (16) every year, in its annual report, the energy regulatory board (commission de r gulation de l' nergie, cre) assessed the operation of the scheme covering these public electricity service costs. the amended decree no 2004-90 (decree no 2004-90 of 28 january 2004 on the compensation of public electricity service costs d cret no 2004-90 du 28 janvier 2004 relatif la compensation des charges de service public de l' lectricit ) organised how this compensation worked: every year, before 15 october, the cre proposed to the minister for energy the estimated costs for the following year and the unit contribution per kwh consumed in france that would allow these costs to be financed. the cre's proposal was based on statements of recorded costs for the previous year (n 1) and on statements of estimated costs for the following year (n + 1). these statements were provided by the operators incurring the costs. as explained in recitals 14 and 15, the collection of contributions was managed centrally by the cdc. (17) the cre checked the amount of the recorded costs. the costs of supporting renewable energies corresponded to the difference between the amount of support and the market price received by the accountable operator selling this energy. the amount of compensation was thus determined by a market price. the cre defined the method for determining this market price. it did not correspond to the actual market value that the accountable operator secured, but to a reference value based on various parameters (forward market price and spot price with different weightings depending on the sub-sector, intraday market price, settlement price for imbalances) that allowed the behaviour of a competitive market player to be reflected more accurately in order to encourage the accountable operator to be competitive. (18) without prejudice to the application of the penalties provided for by law, if, within two months of the date on which it became payable, payment of the contribution was not made or was insufficient, the cre sent a reminder letter together with a penalty for late payment, which was set at 10 % of the amount of the contribution due. if payment was still not made by a person liable for these contributions, the minister for energy imposed an administrative penalty under the conditions laid down by article 41. (19) between 2003 and 2015, the cspe amount collected by the operator responsible for managing the network totalled eur 36,9 billion, divided as follows: cspe amounts collected by edf (eur million) re cogeneration tariff equalisation social tariffs miscellaneous total 2003 129 689 332 0 69 1 219 2004 261 835 470 0 89 1 655 2005 186 810 501 98 99 1 694 2006 72 944 540 49 66 1 671 2007 (5) 560 921 (12) 2 1 466 2008 121 488 995 49 41 1 694 2009 293 499 780 42 42 1 656 2010 411 769 678 57 21 1 936 2011 1 231 784 767 32 68 2 882 2012 1 724 741 1 063 70 29 3 627 2013 2 667 823 1 462 134 60 5 146 2014 3 286 545 1 495 251 46 5 623 2015 4 057 626 1 618 304 58 6 663 14 433 9 113 11 622 1 074 690 36 932 source: memorandum from the french authorities to the commission departments, 20 december 2016. (20) between 2003 and 2015, the composition of the cspe changed as follows: change in cspe 2003-2015 eur billion other social tariffs tariff equalisation cogeneration re 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 source: france memorandum of 20 december 2016. 2.2. cspe reductions (21) the law provided for three types of reduction in the cspe for certain consumers. these reductions could be combined: they are presented below: (a) for industrial customers consuming more than 7 gwh, the amount of the contribution was capped at 0,5 % of the undertaking's value added (article l.121-21 of the energy code). (b) article l.121-12 of the energy code then capped the amount of the contribution payable by final consumers per consumption site at eur 627 783 (4). this cap was updated in line with inflation every year until 2013. in 2014 and 2015, the cap was increased at the same rate as the unit contribution, up to a maximum of 5 % per year. (c) generators of electricity for their own use, up to a maximum of 240 gwh per year and per generating site, could also benefit from a cspe exemption (article l.121-11 of the energy code). (22) between 2003 and 2015, these various cspe reductions, excluding transport undertakings, totalled eur 6,8 billion, divided as follows: value added site breakdown of cspe reductions granted by type 2003-2015 (eur 6,8 billion) site self-generation self-generation value added source: france 15 november 2017. (23) these caps are presented in detail below. 2.2.1. contribution cap of 0,5 % of value added (article l.121-21 of the energy code inserted by article 67 of programme law no 2005-781 of 13 july 2005 laying down energy policy guidelines) (24) the 0,5 % value added cap, which applied to industrial customers consuming more than 7 gwh per year, was established in 2005 through programme law no 2005-781 of 13 july 2005 laying down energy policy guidelines (loi no 2005-781 du 13 juillet 2005 de programme fixant les orientations de la politique nerg tique), and was actually implemented in 2006. (25) france has indicated that the 0,5 % cap was intended to preserve the competitiveness of electro-intensive undertakings, which are active mainly in the metallurgy, paper-making, chemical and other such sectors, in other words sectors exposed to international competition, and particularly undertakings whose consumption exceeded the threshold of 7 gwh per year, which also limited the impact on other categories of consumer. (26) the capping of the cspe at 0,5 % of value added had to be declared to the cre, which carried out checks and then made the decision to reimburse the amounts due. these amounts were reimbursed only once the undertaking's added value was known (i.e. no earlier than during year n + 1 for amounts collected in year n). (27) france has indicated that, out of a total of eur 6,8 billion in reductions granted between 2003 and 2015, the cspe 0,5 % value added cap accounted for 69 % (eur 4,7 billion) of the total exemptions. according to the information provided by france, this cap applied to a total of 1 636 undertakings during the 2003-2015 period. 2.2.2. contribution cap per site (article l.121-12 of the energy code and article 5 of law no 2000-108) (28) this cap was established when the cspe was created, by article 37 of law no 2003-8 of 3 january 2003 referred to above (which amended article 5 of law no 2000-108). it entered into force in 2003. the cspe site cap was initially set at eur 500 000, and was then increased to eur 550 000 through article 37 of finance law for 2011, no 2010-1657 of 29 december 2010 (loi no 2010-1657 du 29 d cembre 2010 de finances pour 2011). this article provided for the cap to be updated in line with the projected growth rate in the consumer price index, excluding tobacco, accompanying the draft finance law for the year. in 2013, the french parliament set this cap at eur 569 418 and, through article 59 of the amending finance law for 2013 (loi de finances rectificative pour 2013), adopted a new rule for updating it: it was to be updated each year in line with the change in the amount of the cspe unit contribution, up to a maximum increase of 5 % per year. as at 1 january 2015, the cap stood at eur 627 783. (29) according to france, the cspe site cap mirrored the 0,5 % value added cap, but per consumption site rather than per undertaking. france has also explained that the site cap allowed undertakings consuming a large amount of electricity at one site, without, however, being electro-intensive, to be included. (30) france has indicated that, out of a total of eur 6,8 billion in reductions granted between 2003 and 2015, the cspe site cap accounted for 29 % (eur 2,0 billion) of that amount. according to france, 522 undertakings benefited from this cap. 2.2.3. 240 gwh exemption threshold (article l.121-11 of the energy code and article 5 of law no 2000-108) (31) the exemption for self-generated electricity was carried over from the public electricity generation service fund (fonds du service public de la production d' lectricit , fsppe), a scheme which preceded the cspe. this fund was created by article 5 of law dated 10 february 2000 related to the modernisation and the development of public service of electricity. it was financed by electricity generators, suppliers and importers and by generators of electricity for their own use exceeding an amount of electricity generated per year that was set by decree. this amount was set at 240 gwh in decree no 2001-1157 of 6 december 2001 on the public electricity generation service fund (d cret no 2001-1157 du 6 d cembre 2001 relatif au fonds du service public de la production d' lectricit ), adopted pursuant to article 5 of law no 2000-108. (32) an electricity generator could be exempted from the contribution up to the number of kilowatt-hours generated and consumed by itself, subject to the cap of 240 gwh per generating site. the same generator could allow one consumer at the same site to benefit from the exemption, where the number of kilowatt-hours exempted by own consumption and sold to that consumer did not exceed the cap of 240 gwh per generating site. (33) france has indicated that the aim of the exemption granted for electricity generated for own use was to limit the taxation of consumers generating their own electricity who, by financing their own facilities, had made the choice not to contribute to, but also not to benefit from, national energy policy. (34) this exemption entered into force in 2002. it was preserved when the cspe was created (in replacement of the fsppe) in 2003, by article 37 of law no 2003-8: the electricity generated by a generator for own use or purchased by a final consumer for own use from a third party operating a generating facility at the consumption site shall be taken into account for the purpose of calculating the contribution only above a threshold of 240 million kilowatt-hours per year and per generating site. (35) france has explained that, in practice, this exemption applied mainly to industrial sites, with the majority possessing cogeneration facilities (excluding electricity generation), and that, in addition, private individuals did not benefit. (36) in 2011, 88 sites benefited from this own consumption exemption, with a total volume of 11 twh having been exempted. furthermore, 94,8 twh, 84,6 twh and 87,4 twh were exempted in 2012, 2013 and 2014 respectively (5). (37) according to france, 88 sites benefited from this exemption over the entire 2003-2015 period. this accounted for around 2 % of the total reductions granted, out of a total of eur 6,8 billion. 2.3. amount of cspe reductions granted (38) over the entire period in question (2003-2015), the cspe reductions totalled eur 6,8 billion. the breakdown of these reductions by type is set out in sections 2.2.1 to 2.2.3. 2.4. beneficiaries of the measures (39) the companies benefiting from the cspe reductions were large electricity consumers, in around 227 sectors in the nace classification. the main areas of activity in which they operated were metallurgy, the chemical and petrochemical industry, gas, paper-making, the nuclear industry, aeronautics, electronics manufacturing, vehicle manufacturing, agri-food and transport. one company could qualify under several exemption criteria simultaneously. (40) the beneficiaries of the measures were eligible for one or more caps on the cspe. according to the information provided by france, over the entire period in question (2003-2015), 1 664 undertakings benefited from cspe reductions, which can be broken down as follows: 1 636 under the 0,5 % value added cap, 552 under the cspe site cap and 88 (6) under the own consumption exemption. some undertakings were able to combine several types of reductions. 2.5. duration of the measures and 2016 reform (41) the cspe was introduced in 2003. its amount and breakdown are set out in sections 2.2.1 to 2.2.3. (42) in 2015, it was replaced by a new scheme. the amending finance law for 2015, no 2015-1786, reformed energy taxation, in particular the funding of public electricity and gas service charges. the cspe was abolished for consumption after 31 december 2015. (43) since 1 january 2016, the policies previously funded by the cspe have been financed through the state budget. 2.6. exclusion from the scope of the decision of the cspe reductions granted to transport undertakings (44) given the specific regulatory framework applicable to rail transport undertakings (7), the cspe reductions granted to those undertakings are excluded from this proceeding and will be the subject of a specific commission decision. they are therefore excluded from the scope of this decision. (45) the total amount of the cspe reductions set out in section 2.2 consequently does not include the reductions granted to rail transport undertakings. 2.7. grounds for initiating the procedure (46) in its opening decision (8), the commission considered that the measures constituted state aid for which sufficient evidence of compatibility with the internal market had not been provided. 2.7.1. existence of aid (47) the commission considered that the cspe reductions granted constituted state aid. (48) first of all, it took the view that the various cspe reductions provided for by law conferred a selective advantage on self-generating undertakings, large electricity consumers and electro-intensive consumers, for three reasons. firstly, the cspe exemption granted to undertakings generating their own electricity, as explained in recital 144 of the opening decision, constituted selective aid. secondly, the commission concluded that beneficiaries of the cspe site cap had enjoyed an advantage granted only to certain economic sectors. lastly, the cspe 0,5 % value added cap applied only to industrial undertakings exceeding a certain consumption threshold, and therefore also conferred an advantage on those undertakings. (49) the commission then observed that the advantages resulting from the cspe reductions, like the cspe itself, had been financed by state resources and were imputable to the state. as the cspe was a state resource, the reductions in the cspe necessarily constituted a waiver of state resources. (50) lastly, the commission also considered that the various cspe reductions were likely to affect trade between member states and distort competition, due to the different treatment of beneficiaries of the measures and their competitors who did not qualify. 2.7.2. compatibility of the aid (51) as regards the compatibility of the measures with the internal market, the commission pointed out that, on the date of the opening decision, the cspe was neither a harmonised environmental tax within the meaning of point 153 of the community guidelines on state aid for environmental protection of 2008, nor a non-harmonised environmental tax within the meaning of point 151 in conjunction with point 70(14) of the 2008 guidelines (9). (52) in that respect, it pointed out that the specific tax base did not necessarily have a negative effect on the environment, given that the cspe was payable in part on renewable electricity. for the same reason, the cspe could not be regarded as having the aim of internalising environmental costs. in addition, it did not aim to orient producers or end-consumers towards activities better respecting the environment. rather, a reduction in consumption would have led to the need to increase the cspe payable in order to cover the costs of producing renewable energy. consequently, chapter 4 (10) of the 2008 guidelines was not applicable. (53) however, the commission considered that the measures aimed at reducing the cspe could be assessed under article 107(3)(c) tfeu and invited france to clarify how this should be done. (54) the commission also noted that the 2008 guidelines were in the process of being revised and that the draft 2014 guidelines contained the following points: (180) the funding of support to energy from renewable sources through charges does as such not target a negative externality and accordingly has no direct environmental effect. however, it may result in higher electricity prices. the increase in electricity costs may be explicit through a specific charge which is levied from electricity consumers on top of the electricity price or indirect through additional costs faced by electricity suppliers due to obligations to buy renewable energy which are subsequently passed on to their customers, the electricity consumers. a typical example would be the mandatory purchase by electricity suppliers of a certain percentage of renewable energy through green certificates for which the supplier is not compensated. (181) in principle, all energy consumers should bear the costs of financing renewable energy support. however, some reductions may be needed to secure a sufficient financing base for renewable energy support (84). in order to avoid that undertakings particularly affected by the funding of renewable energy support are put in a difficult competitive situation, member states may wish to grant partial compensation for additional costs so as to facilitate the overall funding of support to energy from renewable sources and avoid carbon leakage. with no compensation to particularly affected undertakings, public acceptance of setting up ambitious renewable energy support measures may be limited. on the other hand, if such compensation is too high or awarded to too many electricity consumers, public acceptance for renewable energy support may be equally hampered. (55) lastly, the commission pointed out that the draft 2014 guidelines (paragraph 229) stated that aid granted in the form of reductions in the funding of support for energy from renewable sources would be assessed based on the new guidelines on state aid for environmental protection and energy, once these were adopted (even if the aid was granted before the 2014 guidelines entered into force). (56) with france having provided very little information on the objective of the reductions and their justification, the commission also expressed doubts about the compatibility of the aid with the internal market. it therefore invited france to clarify: (i) the objective of common interest served by the measure; (ii) its appropriateness; (iii) its incentive effect, and (iv) its sufficient avoidance of undue negative effects on trade. (57) in its opening decision, therefore, the commission considered that france had not sufficiently demonstrated the compatibility with the internal market of the measures to reduce the cspe for certain beneficiaries. 2.8. adoption of the 2014 guidelines (58) the 2014 guidelines entered into force on 1 july 2014. they introduced a section 3.7.2 on aid in the form of reductions in the funding of support for energy from renewable sources. (59) this section recognises first of all that charges collected to fund energy policies do not have a direct effect on the environment and do not constitute environmental taxes, in the strict sense of the term, which aim to increase the costs of environmentally harmful behaviour. however, they can indirectly contribute to environmental protection by allowing the funding of support schemes contributing to environmental protection. (60) secondly, the guidelines point out that, in some cases, a scheme for funding such support measures through an electricity charge is feasible only if undertakings particularly affected by the financing costs of renewable energy support can benefit from reductions. (61) thirdly, the guidelines determine the levels of reduction deemed acceptable in order to ensure the financial acceptability of the support measures, by preventing too great a burden being placed on other consumers. (62) lastly, section 3.7.3 of the 2014 guidelines sets out the possibility of adopting an adjustment plan in order to progressively adjust the levels of reduction applied by a national measure to levels that are compatible with the provisions of the guidelines and proportional under the state aid rules. 3. comments by interested parties (63) excluding transport undertakings, which will be considered elsewhere, the following comments were made on the opening decision. 3.1. edf (64) edf submitted its comments to the commission on 17 november 2014. according to the edf group, approximately % of the exemptions that it was granted stemmed from the consumption of self-generated electricity in order to produce electricity that was fed into the public network. according to edf, this own consumption involved firstly the electricity consumption of auxiliary equipment in power plants, and secondly the electricity consumption of pumped storage stations at hydroelectric plants, electricity supplied in this second case by nuclear plants. (65) edf considers that this own consumption should benefit from a total exemption from the cspe, firstly in accordance with council directive 2003/96/ec (11), referred to in paragraph 51, article 14(1)(a) of which provides that member states are to exempt from taxation energy products and electricity used to produce electricity and electricity used to maintain the ability to produce electricity, and secondly under the decision validating, as state aid, the german eeg-surcharge scheme laid down by the eeg 2014 act (12). (66) furthermore, edf underlines the need to ensure consistency between the energy-related charge exemption schemes of the various member states, which in particular benefit electro-intensive industries. different treatment of these exemptions in the member states could increase the competitiveness gaps that currently exist in the various markets. 3.2. alfi (67) alfi (air liquide france industrie) submitted its comments to the commission on 3 november 2014. alfi underlines first of all that the energy costs it incurs represent % to % of its production costs. secondly, alfi maintains that an excessively large increase in the cost of electricity would result in the internalisation of industrial gas production by the various industries using these gases (chemical, steel, petrochemical, glass), but on a smaller scale, which would lead to a worldwide increase in energy consumption. (68) thirdly, alfi denies that the cspe reductions gave their beneficiaries an advantage. it contends that the reductions were simply a response to a public service task of supply, and consequently could not constitute aid, although it does not specify the legal basis for this statement. (69) lastly, alfi, while maintaining that there was in fact no aid, as explained in the preceding recital, argues that if the cspe reductions were to be classified as state aid they would be compatible with section 3.7.2 of the 2014 guidelines, which recognises, under certain conditions, the compatibility of different contributions and reductions in contributions intended to benefit electro-intensive industrial undertakings. consequently, recovery of the aid, if aid were shown to exist, would be ruled out in any case. 3.3. uniden (70) uniden, an association representing the interests of energy-intensive industries in france, submitted its comments to the commission on 3 november 2014. according to uniden, the cspe reductions pursued several objectives of common interest, which made the measures compatible under article 107(3) tfeu and the 2014 guidelines. (71) firstly, the measures pursued an objective of maintaining the competitiveness of industrial sectors exposed to global competition. secondly, the measures pursued a social objective. thirdly, the measures pursued an objective of economic, social and territorial cohesion, particularly consisting in the protection of the most disadvantaged consumers. lastly, the measures pursued an objective of energy efficiency, which was fully consistent with european union law. 4. comments by france (72) france has submitted comments on both the classification of the measures and their compatibility with the internal market. 4.1. the site cap and the cap at 0,5 % of value added did not constitute state aid (73) the main arguments put forward by france to demonstrate the absence of aid are the absence of selectivity and the absence of distortion of competition. 4.1.1. no selectivity (74) according to france, the measures were not selective for three main reasons: (75) firstly, it is settled case-law that the application of reductions in surcharges by member states is not sufficient to establish the selectivity of the measure where it is can be supposed that undertakings exceeding the set thresholds are not in the same factual situation as other undertakings. thus the court of justice has found that a site cap was not enough to constitute a selective measure and that caps on taxes do not necessarily constitute selective aid (13). as regards the cspe 0,5 % value added cap, france refers to the case-law of the french constitutional council (conseil constitutionnel), and argues that, in holding the cspe to be compliant with the principle of tax equality, the court recognised that the beneficiaries of this cap were in a different factual situation from other undertakings, so that there was no selective aid (14). (76) secondly, with specific regard to own consumption, france argues that the cspe exemption granted to self-generating consumers involved beneficiaries in a different factual situation from other contributors to the cspe, which therefore rules out the selectivity of the aid. (77) thirdly, the absence of selectivity is proven by the nature of the french tax system, from which the measures stem and which is in no way selective. according to france, the cspe caps derived from the very nature of the tax system, which provides that the tax burden must take account of each person's ability to pay. (78) lastly, for self-generating consumers who produce electricity from renewable energy (re) sources or from cogeneration, mainly in the chemical, iron and steel, and petrochemical sectors, france argues that it was logical for the electricity generated and consumed by them to be exempt from the part of the cspe that funded re or support for cogeneration, given that this electricity did not benefit from any public support funded by the cspe, even though it contributed to the objective of environmental protection pursued by the support for re and cogeneration funded by the cspe in the same way as electricity fed into the network (which did benefit from support funded by the cspe). france contends that, for this reason, the exemption of self-generating consumers using re or cogeneration did not constitute a selective advantage. 4.1.2. no distortion of competition (79) france claims that a similar measure existed before the cspe entered into force in 2003. consequently, the aid had only a small impact on the economic and competitive situation of undertakings established in france. 4.2. if the measures are classified as aid, the site cap and the cap at 0,5 % of value added constituted compatible aid (80) if, however, the measures are classified as aid, france proposes an analysis of the compatibility of the cspe from three different angles: (81) firstly, the measures were compatible because they complied with the provisions of directive 2003/96/ec (see section 4.2.1). (82) secondly, as the cspe can be regarded as an environmental tax, reductions in it were fully compatible with the community guidelines on state aid for environmental protection (the 2001 guidelines) (15), the 2008 guidelines and the 2014 guidelines (see section 4.2.2). (83) thirdly, if the cspe cannot be regarded as an environmental tax, the caps on it were, however, compatible with the 2014 guidelines as regards the component of the cspe that went to finance renewable energy, and with article 107(3)(c) tfeu as regards the other components of the cspe (see section 4.2.3). 4.2.1. the measures were compatible because they complied with the provisions of directive 2003/96/ec (84) france points out that directive 2003/96/ec permits certain exemptions: (85) firstly, article 14(1)(a) of the directive permits exemption from charges for electricity used to produce electricity or maintain the ability to produce electricity. this exemption largely covers the own consumption exemption included in the measures in question. (86) secondly, article 15(1)(e) of the directive permits exemption from charges for electricity that is produced for own consumption by cogeneration. (87) lastly, article 17(1)(a) of the directive permits partial exemption of energy-intensive businesses, defined as business entities where either the purchases of energy products and electricity amount to at least 3 % of the production value or the energy tax payable amounts to at least 0,5 % of the added value. 4.2.2. if the cspe was an environmental tax, the cspe caps were compatible with the applicable state aid rules (88) in its correspondence with the commission, france considers that the cspe can be regarded as an environmental tax, as defined by point 70(14) of the 2008 guidelines. france takes the view that even though the cspe aimed to finance renewable energy the tax base had a negative effect on the environment, and that the aid scheme was therefore favourable to the environment. if the cspe is classified as an environmental tax, the compatibility of the measures with the internal market should be assessed using three successive bases of compatibility. (89) firstly, for the period from 2003 to 2008, the compatibility of the cspe reductions should be assessed with regard to the 2001 guidelines. according to france, the compatibility of the reductions is confirmed by the fact that the beneficiaries paid a significant part of the cspe, i.e. at least 20 %, in accordance with points 51.1(a) and 51.1(b) of the 2001 guidelines. (90) secondly, france considers that the measures complied with the 2008 guidelines for the period from 2008 to 2014. on the one hand, france considers that the cspe was an environmental tax. on the other hand, point 4 of the 2008 guidelines provides that environmental taxes are compatible with the internal market. consequently, according to france, the compatibility of the measures with the internal market is sufficiently demonstrated. (91) lastly, france takes the view that the two cspe caps were compatible with the 2014 guidelines, which applied between 1 july 2014 and the end of the measures in 2015, and that they complied in particular with point 170 of said guidelines. 4.2.3. the caps were compatible pursuant to section 3.7.2 of the 2014 guidelines and article 107(3)(c) tfeu (92) in its memorandum of 22 october 2015, france did, however, agree to consider the possibility that the cspe might not be regarded as an environmental tax and to draw the necessary conclusions as regards the analysis of its compatibility with the internal market pursuant to section 3.7.2 of the 2014 guidelines and article 107(3)(c) tfeu. 4.2.3.1. reduction in the cspe in so far as it funded renewable energy (93) according to france, it is clear that the measures complied with the 2014 guidelines. france explicitly refers to section 3.7.2 as the legal basis for assessing the compatibility of the measures with the internal market (16). (94) firstly, france notes that all aid granted before 1 january 2011 in the form of reductions in funding support for electricity from renewable sources can be declared compatible with the internal market, as stated in paragraph 248 of the 2014 guidelines. (95) secondly, for the period after 2011, france considers that aid can be granted to the extent that it complies with an adjustment plan, based on objective criteria, to progressively adjust the levels of reduction applied by the measures in question to the levels authorised by section 3.7.2 of the 2014 guidelines. (96) france argues that 50 % of the incineration support should be classified as renewable energy support, given that 50 % of the incinerated waste was biodegradable waste, as apparent from the iea and eurostat statistics. 4.2.3.2. reduction in the cspe in so far as it funded cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs (97) as regards the part of the cspe unrelated to the funding of support for electricity from renewable sources, france has provided a detailed compatibility analysis for the measures, which the commission describes below. 4.2.4. objective of common interest of the caps (98) france considers that the treaty provides a satisfactory legal basis for demonstrating the compatibility of the measure with the internal market as regards the caps on the part of the cspe that concerned policies other than the development of renewable energy, as the caps on the part of the cspe that finances the development of renewable energies are governed by the 2014 guidelines. (99) france notes first that, under european legislation, it can be regarded as legitimate for electro-intensive undertakings not to bear excessive electricity charges if this is justified by objectives of common interest, which are (i) cogeneration, (ii) the objective of territorial cohesion and protection of the outermost regions, and (iii) the objective of social cohesion and the fight against exclusion. (1) firstly, support for cogeneration is justified, on the one hand, by directive 2004/8/ec of the european parliament and of the council (17) and, on the other hand, by the conclusions of the european council of 7 and 8 march 2007 setting the objective of reducing energy consumption, in which cogeneration has an important role to play. france notes that the part of the cspe used to support cogeneration could include support for the incineration of non-biodegradable waste, provided that this was used for high-efficiency cogeneration. (2) secondly, tariff equalisation contributes to the community objective of territorial cohesion, which is recognised by article 3 of the treaty on european union (teu). france also maintains that the objective of common interest of this policy is based on article 174 tfeu, article 349 teu and article 107(3)(a) tfeu. (3) thirdly, according to france, the objective of common interest of social tariffs is supported by article 3 teu and article 174 tfeu. france notes that the objective of this policy is also justified by article 1 of the charter of fundamental rights. france then refers to recital 45 to directive 2009/72/ec of the european parliament and of the council (18), according to which member states should take the necessary measures to protect vulnerable customers in the context of the internal market in electricity. france points out that, by guaranteeing access to a fundamental good, the social electricity tariff helps to protect human dignity. (100) according to france, the cspe site cap and 0,5 % value added cap pursued a second objective of maintaining the competitiveness of undertakings, supported by article 173(1) tfeu. france further points out that directive 2003/96/ec also allows member states to apply exemptions in favour of energy-intensive undertakings in order to maintain their competitiveness, a possibility that the 2014 guidelines (section 3.7.2) also allow for the financing of renewable energy. if this objective of maintaining competitiveness is not sufficient to demonstrate the existence of a common interest, france considers that it does help to do so. 4.2.4.1. necessity (101) according to france, the necessity of the measures is duly demonstrated because they contributed towards strengthening the competitiveness of beneficiary undertakings and therefore to preventing risks of relocation. moreover, as the measures were correctly targeted and the caps were correctly sized, they were not discriminatory. france points out the consistency of the thresholds chosen for the two types of exemption, the cap for the site being simply a mirror of the 0,5 % cap for value added. lastly, the beneficiaries were selected according to transparent and objective criteria, aimed at targeting those undertakings most at risk of a loss of competitiveness. (102) france also asserts that the measures were necessary because removing these reductions would have resulted in additional costs, estimated at between 12 % and 24 % of value added. france further maintains that an increase of eur 2/mwh in energy bills would have increased production costs by 2 %, which was more than the net margin of these undertakings. in this context, according to france, the additional financial effort that would have been required if cspe reductions had been removed would simply have increased the risk of electro-intensive undertakings relocating and would have jeopardised the financing of the policies concerned by passing on the burden to other consumers. 4.2.4.2. appropriateness (103) likewise, france considers that the appropriateness of the measures is confirmed by directive 2003/96/ec, which allows undertakings paying an energy tax of 0,5 % of their value added to benefit from exemptions above that threshold, due to the lack of tax harmonisation and the risks of a loss of international competitiveness. (104) according to france, the cspe reductions were therefore appropriate in the absence of full tax harmonisation and taking into account the major deterioration in european competitiveness. 4.2.4.3. proportionality (105) france then states that the cspe reductions were proportionate. they corresponded to an average contribution of 31 % to 34 % of the total contribution, i.e. between eur 5,1/mwh and eur 5,6/mwh (2014 estimate), to be compared with a cspe of eur 16,5/mwh (on the same date). france argues that this rate of 31 % to 34 % was higher than the minimum rate permitted by the 2008 guidelines, and also by sections 3.7.1 and 3.7.2 of the 2014 guidelines, and that it was therefore proportionate. (106) according to france, the reductions could therefore be regarded as proportionate, in that they left their beneficiaries to pay a sufficiently substantial part of the cspe. (107) france has notified the amounts paid in cspe by individual beneficiaries in 2014. the commission notes that, for 2014 alone, at least 124 beneficiaries paid a level of cspe less than the 15 % rate laid down in paragraph 188 of the 2014 guidelines. 4.2.4.4. incentive effect of the measures (108) france considers that this condition is not applicable here. it argues that the measures were intended not to encourage beneficiaries to change their behaviour, but rather to try to avoid a loss of competitiveness. 4.2.4.5. limitation of distorting effects on competition and positive cost-benefit ratio (109) france maintains in this respect that the cspe exemptions in fact limited distortion of competition. in its comments, france contends that, despite the cspe caps, the price differential for electro-intensive undertakings between france and the united states remained significant in the order of eur 10/mwh. france also cites an icf study to point out that france grants fewer exemptions than germany, italy or denmark (19). 4.2.4.6. compatibility of the cspe caps where the cspe was used for objectives other than funding electricity generation from renewable energy and high-efficiency cogeneration, support for tariff equalisation or social tariffs (110) lastly, as regards the other components of the cspe, described in recital 11(1) to (3), france has put forward the following arguments: (1) with regard to the support for the incineration of biodegradable waste, france draws attention first to the existence of a common interest in incineration as far as it concerns renewable energy. as regards incineration involving non-biodegradable waste, france argues that this support was aimed at improving energy efficiency. france contends that the measures were proportionate in that the feed-in tariff allowed a rate of return of between 6 % and 7 % to be achieved. lastly, the measures did not have any distorting effect, as all incineration plants were eligible for the scheme. (2) the support for peak-demand facilities served another objective of common interest, namely security of supply. this support was needed so that investments could be made. lastly, france considers that the limited power of the facilities concerned (78 mw in 2014) limited the distorting effect. (3) finally, as regards the funding of firm capacity contracts, france has not explained the necessity or appropriateness of such support. 4.3. the cspe exemptions granted to self-generating consumers did not constitute state aid (111) as a preliminary comment, france argues that in the case of own consumption for the production of electricity the exemption was fully compatible with directive 2003/96/ec, which provides that small producers of electricity can be exempted from an electricity tax provided that the energy products used for the production of that electricity are taxed in another way. (112) as regards the existence of aid, france explains first that these cspe exemptions did not constitute selective aid. the exemption did not depend on the type of activity of the beneficiary, and applied in principle to all undertakings up to a maximum capacity of 240 gwh. in addition, the beneficiaries did not place any burden on the electricity system in respect of the electricity they generated themselves. it was therefore legitimate for them to be treated differently from consumers purchasing all their electricity. (113) france then argues that the cspe exemption granted to self-generating undertakings did not distort competition, because several countries, within the european union in particular, applied the same type of exemption. this exemption consequently could not constitute state aid. (114) as regards the compatibility of the exemption, france considers that, even if the exemption of self-generating consumers did constitute aid, it was in pursuit of an objective of common interest, namely contributing to security of supply by mitigating the effects of peak electricity consumption. 4.4. adjustment plan following adoption of the 2014 guidelines (115) having put forward the argument that the measures were compatible with the internal market on the basis of section 3.7.2 of the 2014 guidelines and article 107(3)(c) tfeu, as explained in section 4.2.3, france drew the necessary conclusions in a letter to the commission dated 27 october 2017. in the letter france notified a new version of the adjustment plan, applying section 3.7.3 of the 2014 guidelines, aimed at bringing the reductions granted by the measures into line with the exemption levels compatible with the guidelines defined in section 3.7.2 thereof, in accordance with objective rules. (116) this calculation of the cspe allocated to the different objectives makes it possible to calculate the amount to be paid by beneficiaries of the cspe reductions under the adjustment plan. the amount is between the amount already paid in cspe and the amount calculated under the guidelines. the amount to be paid in cspe is calculated differently depending on the cspe component concerned, and is determined as indicated in section 4.4.1. 4.4.1. direct application of section 3.7.3 to the funding of renewable energy component of the cspe (117) for the part of the cspe used to fund renewable energy, including the incineration of biodegradable waste, france envisages an adjustment plan such that, gradually, by the theoretical date of 1 january 2019, given that the cspe was suspended on 1 january 2016, the amount to be paid in cspe becomes that calculated according to the 2014 guidelines: (118) if the undertaking (i) belongs to a sector listed in annex 3 to the 2014 guidelines and has an electro-intensity in excess of 20 % or (ii) has both an electro-intensity of at least 20 % and an exposure to international trade in excess of 4 % (or the figure indicated in annex 5 to the guidelines), then the undertaking must pay either 15 % of the surcharge or 0,5 % of its value added, whichever is the lower. (119) if the undertaking belongs to a sector listed in annex 3 to the 2014 guidelines and has an electro-intensity of less than 20 %, then it must pay either 15 % of the surcharge or 4 % of its value added, whichever is the lower. (120) in other cases, if (i) the undertaking belongs to a sector that is not listed in annex 3 to the guidelines, or (ii) it belongs to a sector listed in annex 5 but has an electro-intensity of less than 20 %, and (iii) it benefited from aid before 1 july 2014, then it must pay at least 20 % of the surcharge. (121) lastly, in all other cases, the cspe level to be reached by 1 january 2019 is 100 %. 4.4.2. application of section 3.7.3 by analogy to the cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs components of the cspe (122) for cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs, the adjustment plan is such that, by 2019 at the latest, the cspe amount paid is: 15 % if the undertaking is an electro-intensive undertaking within the meaning of paragraphs 185 to 186 of the 2014 guidelines; if the undertaking has an electro-intensity in excess of 20 % and belongs to a sector listed in annex 3 or annex 5 to the guidelines, then the cspe amount can be limited to 0,5 % of the undertaking's value added and to 4 % if the undertaking does not have an electro-intensity reaching or exceeding 20 %; 100 % for other undertakings. (123) france considers that this adjustment plan is justified for the same reasons as those set out in section 3.7.3 of the 2014 guidelines on reductions in charges intended to fund renewable energy. in particular, the adjustment plan avoids the excessively abrupt increase in the burden that would result from immediately applying the criteria set out in paragraphs 185 to 189 of the 2014 guidelines. in this respect, it contributes to the financial sustainability of the cspe, while ensuring the acceptability of the support and its methods of financing. 4.4.3. non-application of the adjustment plan to the other components of the cspe (124) however, with regard to the reduction in the cspe allocated to the objectives described in recital 110(1) to (2), france has not included these objectives in the adjustment plan. france has confirmed that the cspe allocated to these objectives should be paid in full for the period in question (2003-2015) (20) and that the reductions granted in the cspe allocated to these objectives will be recovered in full. 4.4.4. start date of the adjustment plans (125) for the re and cogeneration components, france will start the adjustment plan with effect from 2011. france relies in this respect on paragraph 248 of the 2014 guidelines and on the commission decisions of 15 june 2017 (sa.38635 (21)) and 21 september 2017 (sa.47887 (22)). (126) for the other components funded by the cspe, following the doubts expressed by the commission in the opening decision, france will start the adjustment plan with effect from 2004. france considers that this date is justified by the ten-year limitation period applicable in this case pursuant to article 17 of council regulation (eu) 2015/1589 (23). 4.4.5. treatment of own consumption in the adjustment plan 4.4.5.1. exemption from the cspe for the consumption of electricity used to produce electricity (127) according to france, article 14 of directive 2003/96/ec, which provides that the consumption of electricity used to produce electricity and to maintain the ability to produce electricity is fully exempt from taxation, allows beneficiaries of the own consumption allowance who are electricity producers (nace code 3511) to be exempted from the cspe on electricity that they consume. consequently, france considers that these beneficiaries should not be included in the adjustment plan. 4.4.5.2. electricity produced from re for own consumption (128) for beneficiaries of the allowance who produce electricity from re, the electricity produced for their own consumption can be exempted from the part of the cspe that funded re, given that such electricity received no public support whilst the cspe was funding partial support for re. (129) however, france's adjustment plan does cover the exemption from the rest of the cspe, except where the corresponding advantage is less than the ceiling for de minimis aid. 4.4.5.3. electricity produced from cogeneration for own consumption (130) in the same way, for beneficiaries of the reduction who produce electricity from cogeneration, the electricity produced for own consumption can be exempted from the part of the cspe that funds cogeneration, given that such electricity has not received any public support. (131) however, france's adjustment plan does cover the exemption from the rest of the cspe, except where the corresponding advantage is less than the ceiling for de minimis aid. 4.4.6. methodology for the allocation by policy of the cspe theoretically payable, excluding exemptions (132) for the cspe to be paid, excluding exemptions, france has made a calculation for each undertaking, based on the annual rate and consumption of the undertaking. this theoretical amount of cspe is allocated by policy according to the breakdown provided by the cre and notified to the commission on 20 december 2016: re (%) incineration (%) cogeneration (%) tariff equalisation (%) social tariffs (%) peak-demand production (%) miscellaneous (%) 2003 11 2 57 27 0 2 1 2004 16 3 50 28 0 2 1 2005 11 2 48 30 6 3 1 2006 4 1 57 32 3 2 1 2007 0 3 38 63 1 2 1 2008 7 1 29 59 3 3 1 2009 18 0 30 47 3 1 1 2010 21 1 40 35 3 1 1 2011 43 1 27 27 1 0 1 2012 48 0 20 29 2 0 0 2013 52 1 16 28 3 0 0 2014 58 1 10 27 4 0 0 2015 61 1 9 24 5 0 0 total 41,9 0,6 23,0 30,5 2,9 0,7 0,5 annual weight of each policy memorandum from the french authorities of 20 december 2016 (133) france stresses that re, cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs account for 98,2 % of the cspe amounts borne since 2003. (134) as regards incineration, france points out that the iea and eurostat statistics allow half of the energy produced by household waste incineration plants in the form of heat or electricity to be counted as renewable. consequently, 50 % of the cspe allocated to support incineration is included in the re component. moreover, support for the incineration of non-biodegradable waste used for high-efficiency cogeneration is allocated to the cogeneration component of the cspe. france accordingly opts for the following breakdown: re (%) cogeneration (%) tariff equalisation + social tariffs (%) incineration of non-biodegradable waste (%) miscellaneous (%) 2003 12 57 27 1 3 2004 17 50 28 2 2 2005 12 48 35 1 4 2006 5 57 35 1 3 2007 2 38 62 2 3 2008 6 29 62 1 4 2009 18 30 50 0 2 2010 21 40 38 1 2 2011 43 27 28 1 1 2012 48 20 31 0 1 2013 52 16 31 0 0 2014 59 10 31 0 0 2015 61 9 29 0 0 4.4.6.1. application of de minimis ceilings (135) france states that, for each of the cspe reductions granted, the de minimis ceiling laid down by commission regulation (eu) no 1407/2013 (24) has been applied. for each beneficiary, the amount of aid granted over the last three years on a rolling basis is compared with the amount of eur 200 000. if the amount of aid granted over the last three years on a rolling basis is less than eur 200 000, the amount of the repayment is zero for those three years. france states that it will also take account of commission decision n 7/09 (25) providing for an increase in the de minimis ceiling to eur 500 000 for the years 2009 and 2010 in order to allow for the economic crisis at the time. 4.4.7. progressive application of the adjustment plan (136) for beneficiaries that cannot be classified as electro-intensive undertakings within the meaning of paragraphs 185 to 187 of the 2014 guidelines, or that do not fully comply with the provisions of section 3.7.2 of those guidelines, france has submitted an adjustment plan leading to a gradual increase in their contribution (see recitals 117 and 118). (137) this adjustment plan applies to all components of the cspe. it corrects all the caps and exemptions granted under the measure. it also covers all the policies funded by the cspe. (138) the starting point of the adjustment plan is the cspe actually paid by beneficiaries for the year in which the plan starts (2004 or 2011 as applicable). (139) this adjustment plan for the various cspe reductions granted must lead to the amounts paid reaching the minimum contribution levels required by the state aid rules by 1 january 2019 at the latest. the cspe amount should reach the levels called for in recitals 118 to 122. (140) this increase is achieved by applying the following progression rule: (141) amount to be paid per year per policy funded = amount paid (142) + (amount to be paid amount paid) [(e^n)-1]/[(e^n)-1] where n: year number of the adjustment plan (e.g.: for a plan starting in 2011 that must be fully applied in 2019, in 2011 n = 0, in 2012 n = 1, , in 2019 n = 8) and n: number of years of the plan (e.g.: for the same example as above, n = 8). (143) this rule means that the cspe amount to be paid moves closer over time to the theoretical cspe level to be paid by 2019. as the cspe was abolished in 2016, the adjustment plan will not, however, be applied beyond 2015. (144) the function used to go from this starting point to the theoretical end point is progressive. 4.4.8. calculation of the sums to be recovered (145) the adjustment plan provides for the cspe amounts that have been exempted beyond the levels authorised by the adjustment plan to be recovered. (146) the amount to be repaid is the difference between (i) the cspe to be paid as described in sections 4.4.1 to 4.4.7 and (ii) the cspe actually paid by beneficiaries. this amount is calculated per beneficiary and per year. (147) in the case of beneficiaries of the own consumption allowance who produce electricity from re or cogeneration for their own consumption, the minimum level of cspe is zero for the cspe that funded re or cogeneration as the case may be. (148) if, for a given beneficiary and a given year, the amount paid for a given policy is at least the amount to be paid according to the minimum level of cspe required, then the amount used for the adjustment plan is the minimum level of cspe that must be paid for that year. in this case, the excess paid is not deducted from the amount to be recovered from the particular beneficiary as a result of the calculation made for other years. (149) in its memorandum of 11 october, france provided a preliminary estimate of the sums to be recovered, which was eur 31 million. around 700 undertakings could be subject to recovery. however, france has stated that the assessment of this amount must be finalised once the information on the reductions per beneficiary has been gathered for all the years. 5. the commission's assessment 5.1. existence of aid (150) as stated in article 107(1) tfeu, any aid granted by a member state or through state resources in any form whatsoever which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods shall, in so far as it affects trade between member states, be incompatible with the common market. (151) the commission has assessed whether the various cspe reductions can be classified as aid in the light of these provisions. 5.1.1. state aid classification of the cspe site cap and 0,5 % value added cap 5.1.1.1. aid imputable to a member state and granted through state resources (152) the commission concluded in section 3.1.1 of the opening decision that the cspe constituted a state resource. (153) the commission notes first of all that no interested party has disputed the conclusion referred to in the above recital. (154) the commission points out that, according to the case-law of the court of justice, only advantages granted directly or indirectly through public resources can be regarded as state aid within the meaning of article 107(1) tfeu. (155) the simple fact that an advantage is not directly funded through state resources is not sufficient to rule out the involvement of state resources. according to the case-law of the court of justice, it is not necessary to establish that there has been a transfer of funds, from the general budget of the state or a public entity, for an advantage granted to one or more undertakings to be capable of being regarded as a state aid within the meaning of article 107(1) tfeu (26). (156) according to the case-law of the court of justice and the commission's well-established decision-making practice, funds resulting from state levies, managed and apportioned in accordance with the provisions of national legislation, constitute state aid within the meaning of article 107(1) tfeu even if they are managed by a public or private entity (essent (27), vent de col re (28)). (157) the court of justice has already confirmed that the cspe constituted a state resource. it did so in its judgment of 19 december 2013, vent de col re (29)), which concerned the obligation to purchase wind-generated electricity described in recital 10(a) above and funded by the cspe. (158) thirdly, the commission points out that the advantage was imputable to the state because the caps resulted from the applicable law and administrative acts which determined the scheme and rules for applying those caps. (159) the state nature of the cspe is also confirmed by the mechanism adopted by france for collecting this contribution. as explained in recitals 14 and 15, the cspe was centrally collected by the cdc, which is a public entity, meaning that the cspe was financially managed by a public entity controlled by the state, which supports the conclusion that it should be classified as a state resource. (160) consequently, the commission confirms the findings it made in its opening decision. the cspe, and in particular the caps on it, were imputable to the state and were granted through state resources. 5.1.1.2. economic advantage and selectivity (161) when assessing the existence of an advantage, the commission notes that, according to the case-law of the court of justice, measures which, in various forms, mitigate the charges borne by an undertaking and which, without being subsidies in the strict meaning of the word, are similar in character to state aid are therefore considered to constitute state aid (30). (162) in the present case, the commission points out that article 5 of law no 2000-108 (as amended by article 37 of law no 2003-8) established the principle that the cspe was payable by final consumers of electricity established on french territory and that the amount of the cspe was to be calculated in proportion to the quantity of electricity consumed. by exempting from the cspe any electricity consumed in excess of the site cap, or in the case of electro-intensive industrial undertakings 0,5 % of the value added, the state mitigated the cspe charges that beneficiary undertakings should otherwise have paid. the site and value added caps therefore conferred advantages on the beneficiary undertakings. (163) with regard to the existence of a selective advantage, the court of justice found in its judgments of 21 december 2016, in commission v world duty free group and commission v banco santander and santusa (31), that, in order to establish the selectivity of a tax measure or charge, it must be determined whether that measure or charge introduces, between operators that are, in the light of the objective pursued by the general tax system concerned, in a comparable factual and legal situation, a distinction that is not justified by the nature and general structure of that system. (164) the concept of aid does not, however, cover measures which differentiate between undertakings in relation to charges where that differentiation is the result of the nature and general scheme of the system of levies in question. it is for the member state which has introduced such a differentiation between undertakings in relation to charges to show that it is actually justified by the nature and general scheme of the system in question (32). reference system (165) the commission points out that article 5 of law no 2000-108 (as amended by article 37 of law no 2003-8) established the principle that the cspe was payable by final consumers of electricity established on the french territory and that the cspe amount was to be calculated in proportion to the quantity of electricity consumed. the cspe was used to fund the following measures: (a) an obligation imposed on edf or local distribution companies to purchase electricity generated by certain types of plant producing electricity from renewable energy sources; (b) the financing of high-efficiency cogeneration; (c) compensation given to electricity generators in non-interconnected areas (corsica or overseas departments) so that in the electricity price paid by the final consumer the generators do not pass on the difference between the generation costs they have to bear and the generation costs borne in mainland france (tariff equalisation); (d) implementing the basic necessity social tariff and covering some of the costs borne by electricity suppliers due to their financial participation in the scheme to help people living in poverty; (e) other objectives, mainly support for incineration and peak-demand generation, involving less than 2 % of the cspe collected. differentiation between undertakings in a comparable factual and legal situation with regard to the objective of the measures in question (166) the commission points out that the undertakings benefiting from the cspe site cap and 0,5 % value added cap were in the same factual situation as other final consumers with regard to the objectives of the cspe. firstly, they were electricity consumers, and there was nothing to suggest that the consumers benefiting from the caps were any different from the consumers not benefiting from the caps with regard to the objectives of funding support for renewable energy, cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs. those beneficiaries should therefore have contributed in the same proportion as other final consumers to the funding of the public electricity service. (167) in addition, the eligibility criteria for the site cap and 0,5 % value added cap resulted in further discrimination within the group of undertakings likely to be covered by those caps. (168) firstly, the 0,5 % value added cap, the stated intention of which was to cover electro-intensive undertakings, was actually reserved solely for larger undertakings, due to the minimum consumption threshold for eligibility of 7 gwh per year. as a result, electro-intensive undertakings for which the cspe exceeded 0,5 % of value added, but which had a lower annual consumption, were not eligible for the value added cap, even though they had the same electro-intensity and were active in the same sector. in addition, the value added cap was reserved for industrial undertakings, to the exclusion of electro-intensive undertakings active for example in the service sector. the commission concludes that none of these points of distinction is explained by the nature and objective of the cspe. (169) secondly, as regards the site cap, law no 2000-108 (as amended by article 37 of law no 2003-8) capped the cspe at eur 500 000 initial amount per consumption site. the commission notes that, according to additional information provided by france, and based on the value of the cap and the cspe in 2013, this cap corresponded to an annual consumption of 42 gwh. such consumption is achieved only by certain economic sectors, as confirmed by france in the information provided on the sectors concerned. the cap therefore gave a selective advantage to certain undertakings or certain sectors and cannot be explained by the logic of the cspe. the commission concludes that, as regards this second cap, none of these points of distinction established by the law is explained by the nature and objective of the cspe. (170) with regard to france's argument, outlined in recital 77, that the cspe caps were justified by the application of the principle that charges should be levied on the basis of the taxpayer's ability to pay, the commission notes that france has not proven that this is an underlying principle of the cspe. nor has france shown that the undertakings that did not qualify for the cap were capable of paying, which is necessary in order to demonstrate that these caps were consistent with the logic of the system. lastly, france has not proven that the undertakings that did qualify for the cap were all unable to pay a higher amount in cspe (33). (171) in addition, the site cap was applied without any link to the taxpayer's ability to pay. while it may be accepted that there is a link between ability to pay and the turnover or value added of an undertaking, the site cap resulted in exemption from the cspe on everything above the cap, regardless of any growth in turnover or value added. consequently, the argument put forward by france in recital 77 is not admissible. (172) lastly, the commission notes that the value added cap does seem to have been linked to the ability to pay of the undertaking concerned. however, even if the cspe were based on the principle of the ability to pay, which france has not demonstrated, the value added cap would still have been selective, because it was not applied in a non-discriminatory manner to all undertakings in the same factual and legal situation. the value added cap was in fact limited to industrial undertakings only, to the exclusion of non-industrial undertakings. however, the latter could have had an electricity consumption such that the application of the 0,5 % value added cap would have been justified. furthermore, the value added cap was also limited solely to undertakings large enough to reach an annual consumption of 7 gwh, to the exclusion of smaller undertakings not reaching that threshold even though the cspe reached 0,5 % of their value added. (173) for these reasons, the commission concludes that the various caps provided for by the law constituted a selective advantage to the benefit of certain undertakings or sectors of the economy, and it therefore confirms the analysis it set out in the opening decision of 16 september 2014. the measures conferred an advantage on their beneficiaries, compared with the reference system that required all final consumers to participate in the system in order to fund the objectives of the cspe. in this respect, the commission does not agree with the position of alfi set out in recital 68 nor with that of france set out in recitals 74 to 78. (174) lastly, as indicated in recital 164, france has not proven that this difference in treatment resulted from the system of levies in question. the burden of proof rests with the member state in this respect. 5.1.1.3. impact on competition and trade between member states (175) the undertakings benefiting from the cspe site cap and value added cap were in competition with undertakings from other member states (metallurgy, papermaking, agri-food, chemicals, etc.). thus the site and value added caps were likely to have an impact on competition and trade between member states. (176) consequently, the commission does not agree with the position defended by france and set out in recital 79. 5.1.1.4. conclusion on existence of aid (177) for the reasons set out in recitals 48 to 50, the commission confirms the findings made in its opening decision and therefore considers that the site cap and value added cap constituted state aid. 5.1.2. cspe exemptions granted for own consumption intended for the production of electricity 5.1.2.1. aid imputable to a member state and granted through state resources (178) for the same reasons as those set out in section 5.1.1.1, the commission confirms that these exemptions were imputable to the member state and granted through state resources. 5.1.2.2. impact on competition and trade between member states (179) the undertakings benefiting from these cspe exemptions (mainly electricity generators with nuclear plants and hydroelectric plants using pumped storage stations) were in competition with undertakings from other member states. consequently, these exemptions were likely to have an impact on competition and trade between member states. (180) france considers that the cspe exemption granted to self-generating undertakings did not distort competition, as several countries, within the european union in particular, applied the same type of exemption, as explained in recital 79. (181) it is settled case-law that a measure implemented by a member state is regarded as distortive when it strengthens the competitive position of a beneficiary compared with its competitors (34). this is the case where a measure reduces the costs that are normally borne by an undertaking. in addition, the court of justice has already decided that unilateral measures through which a member state seeks to approximate the conditions of competition in a particular sector to those prevailing in other member states cannot deprive the measures in question of their character as state aid (35). 5.1.2.3. economic advantage and selectivity (182) the commission notes that, at first sight, the exemption conferred an advantage on self-generators. as already mentioned in recital 162, the cspe was payable by final consumers of electricity established on french territory and the amount of the cspe was to be calculated in proportion to the quantity of electricity consumed. by exempting part of the own consumption from the cspe, the state mitigated the cspe charges that beneficiary undertakings should otherwise have paid. (183) the commission next has to assess whether this advantage was selective. firstly, the reference system the cspe has been described in recital 165. it consisted of a charge that was payable by all final consumers of electricity on their electricity consumption. the charge was collected in order to fund support measures pursuing specific objectives. (184) secondly, the commission must ascertain whether granting an allowance for own consumption with a view to the production of electricity is consistent with the logic of a system of levies on electricity. the consumption of electricity in order to produce electricity constitutes (final) electricity consumption. in this respect, the electricity consumption of an electricity generator cannot be distinguished from the electricity consumption of another consumer with regard to the objectives of the cspe, and the partial exemption of own consumption in order to produce electricity seems to result in an unjustified difference with regard to the cspe objectives. the commission therefore concludes that the measure seems prima facie to be selective, because it introduces a differentiation between undertakings that are in a comparable factual and legal situation with regard to the cspe objectives. (185) france, however, maintains that the exemption is intended to prevent double taxation, which is a generally accepted principle of tax systems. (186) without the exemption, the electricity consumed by the final consumer would be subject to the cspe twice: once on electricity a used to produce electricity b and once on electricity b generated from electricity a. (187) the commission has already recognised that the prevention of double taxation is a principle generally found in systems of charges raised on the consumption of electricity (36), as well as in other tax systems (37). it is also this principle that led to the adoption of article 14(1)(a) of directive 2003/96/ec of 27 october 2003. the commission therefore endorses the argument put forward by france outlined in recital 111. (188) the commission therefore considers that the exemptions granted to undertakings generating electricity to produce electricity were justified by the nature and general scheme of the cspe charging system. (189) consequently, the commission considers that the exemptions for the own consumption of electricity in order to produce electricity did not constitute a selective advantage. it concludes that the cspe exemptions granted to self-generating sites using electricity to produce electricity did not constitute state aid. 5.1.2.4. conclusion on existence of aid (190) for the reasons set out in recitals 178 to 189, the commission concludes that the cspe exemptions granted for the own consumption of electricity to produce electricity did not constitute state aid. (191) the commission therefore confirms the conclusions of france, as set out in recital 127, according to which no adjustment plan is required for these beneficiaries. 5.1.3. cspe exemptions granted for the own consumption of electricity self-generated from high-efficiency cogeneration and renewable energy as regards the part of the cspe allocated to fund these objectives 5.1.3.1. aid imputable to a member state and granted through state resources (192) for the same reasons as those set out in section 5.1.2.1, the commission confirms that these exemptions were imputable to the member state and granted through state resources. 5.1.3.2. economic advantage and selectivity (193) as already stated in recitals 182 to 189, the commission considers, at first sight, that the partial cspe exemption granted to self-generators conferred an advantage on them. (194) the commission next has to assess whether this advantage was selective for the own consumption of electricity self-generated from high-efficiency cogeneration and renewable energy. (195) firstly, the reference system has been described in recital 165. this reference system the cspe was a charge paid by all electricity consumers, which pursued specific objectives. (196) secondly, with regard to the cspe exemption for the own consumption of electricity generated by facilities using renewable energy or high-efficiency cogeneration, in respect of the part of the cspe used to fund renewable energy and high-efficiency cogeneration, the commission considers that beneficiaries of this allowance were in the same factual and legal situation as other cspe contributors with regard to the objective pursued by the cspe, which required all final consumers of electricity to contribute to the system in order to fund the cspe objectives. (197) the commission observes that self-generators having made the choice to use renewable energy or high-efficiency cogeneration for their own electricity consumption directly contributed to the objectives of two measures funded by the cspe, namely support for the generation of electricity from renewable energy and support for high-efficiency cogeneration facilities. however, france has confirmed that these self-generators did not benefit from support measures for the self-generated electricity. only the electricity fed into the network could receive support funded via the cspe. given that the self-generation of electricity from renewable energy sources or high-efficiency cogeneration contributed in the same way as the electricity fed into the network to the environmental protection and energy efficiency objectives pursued by the support measures funded by the cspe, the commission therefore considers that it was consistent with the logic and nature of the cspe to exempt self-generators using renewable energy or high-efficiency cogeneration for their own electricity consumption (and not benefiting from any support funded via the cspe for that electricity) from the part of the cspe intended to fund the support measures for renewable energy and cogeneration respectively (38). this exemption consequently did not constitute a selective advantage. (198) while it is justified to exempt a self-generator using high-efficiency cogeneration from the part of the cspe that funds support for cogeneration, this is not, however, justified in respect of the part of the cspe that funds support for renewable energy, except where the cogeneration facility also uses renewable energy. likewise, while it is justified to exempt a self-generator using renewable energy from the part of the cspe that funds support for renewable energy, this is not justified in respect of the part of the cspe that funds support for cogeneration, except where the facility is itself a high-efficiency cogeneration facility. (199) in addition, it is not justified to exempt a self-generator using high-efficiency cogeneration or renewable energy from the part of the cspe that funds the other objectives (particularly the social tariffs and tariff equalisation). with regard to the funding of these other objectives, self-generators using high-efficiency cogeneration or renewable energy are in a comparable factual and legal situation to other electricity consumers, given that their self-generation does not contribute to these other objectives. (200) the commission also observes that the cspe exemptions granted to self-generating sites cannot be justified by an objective of common interest linked to improving peak demand management, as argued by france, because this objective of common interest was not an objective of the reference system, namely the cspe. in addition, even if the cspe did have this objective, the self-generation exemption would not as such have allowed demand peaks to be managed. self-generators are always connected to the network, not only so that they can feed their production surplus into the network, but also so that they can take electricity from the network in the event of their facilities being faulty or undergoing maintenance, or, quite simply, to supplement their self-generating facility. but the exemption was not subject to the condition that electricity should not be taken from the network at times of peak demand. (201) france has also maintained that the partial self-generation exemption was justified by the fact that self-generators have made a choice not to use the public electricity service. however, the commission notes, first, that france has not shown that the cspe was based on the level of use of the public electricity service. france has confirmed that all self-generators benefiting from the partial self-generation exemption were connected to the public network, so that they all had the option of using the network, if necessary, to feed their production surplus into the network or to take electricity from the network if their facility was faulty or undergoing maintenance. the commission also notes that, with regard to the part of the cspe that funded tariff equalisation with the overseas territories, self-generators and final consumers in mainland france were in the same situation, as neither benefited from this service, but both were required to fund it in a spirit of solidarity. (202) lastly, france has argued that the (partial) exemption was justified by directive 2003/96/ec, which provides that small producers of electricity can be exempted from an electricity tax provided that the energy products used for the production of that electricity are taxed in another way (see recitals 76 and 111). the commission notes in this respect that directive 2003/96/ec is not applicable as such to the cspe, which france did in fact acknowledge in its correspondence before the formal investigation procedure was opened. in addition, even if directive 2003/96/ec were applicable, or its guiding principles should be applied to the cspe by analogy, it must be concluded that the exemption was not justified. as the cspe was levied only on electricity, it did not apply to energy products other than electricity used to produce that electricity. as a result, the application of directive 2003/96/ec would in reality tend to confirm that the cspe should have been levied on such electricity. 5.1.3.3. impact on competition and trade between member states (203) the undertakings benefiting from these cspe exemptions were in competition with undertakings from other member states. the self-generators in question were not electricity producers, but industrial undertakings active mainly in chemicals, iron and steel and petrochemicals, as indicated by france and noted in recital 78. consequently, these exemptions were likely to have an impact on competition and trade between member states. 5.1.3.4. conclusion on existence of aid (204) the commission concludes that the cspe exemptions granted for the own consumption of electricity produced respectively from renewable energy sources and high-efficiency cogeneration and used to produce electricity did not constitute state aid as regards the parts of the cspe that funded renewable energy and high-efficiency cogeneration. however, the exemption from the parts of the cspe that funded objectives other than support for renewable energy and high-efficiency cogeneration did constitute state aid. (205) the commission therefore endorses the conclusions reached by france outlined in recitals 128 to 131. 5.1.4. exemptions granted for self-generation from sources other than high-efficiency cogeneration and renewable energy 5.1.4.1. aid imputable to a member state and granted through state resources (206) for the same reasons as those set out in section 5.1.2.1, the commission confirms that these exemptions were imputable to the member state and granted through state resources. 5.1.4.2. economic advantage and selectivity (207) as already stated in recital 193, the commission considers that the partial cspe exemption granted to self-generators conferred an advantage on them. (208) the commission also considers that the exemptions granted to self-generators where their own consumption was not used (i) to produce electricity, or where the self-generated electricity consumed by the self-generator did not come from (ii) renewable energy or high-efficiency cogeneration, gave a selective advantage to their beneficiaries, compared with cspe contributors who were, however, in the same factual situation as their competitors paying the cspe. (209) the reference system has been described in recital 165. the cspe was a charge applied in principle to all electricity consumption in france which was intended to finance measures pursuing specific objectives. (210) where beneficiaries of the exemption were self-generators not using the own consumption to produce electricity, or where the self-generated electricity consumed by the self-generator did not come from renewable energy or high-efficiency cogeneration, these beneficiaries were in the same factual and legal situation as other consumers with regard to the objective of the cspe. in particular, they consumed electricity and their self-generation did not contribute to any of the objectives of the measures funded by the cspe. (211) the commission also observes that the cspe exemptions granted to self-generating sites cannot be justified by an objective of common interest linked to improving peak demand management, as argued by france, because this objective of common interest was not an objective of the reference system, namely the cspe. in addition, even if the cspe did have this objective, the self-generation exemption would not as such have allowed demand peaks to be managed. self-generators are always connected to the network, not only so that they can feed their production surplus into the network, but also so that they can take electricity from the network in the event of their facilities being faulty or undergoing maintenance, or, quite simply, to supplement their self-generating facility. but the exemption was not subject to the condition that electricity should not be taken from the network at times of peak demand. (212) france has also maintained that the partial self-generation exemption was justified by the fact that self-generators have made a choice not to use the public electricity service. however, the commission notes, first, that france has not shown that the cspe was based on the level of use of the public electricity service. france has also confirmed that all self-generators benefiting from the partial self-generation exemption were connected to the public network, so that they all had the option of using the network, if necessary, to feed their production surplus into the network or to take electricity from the network if their facility was faulty or undergoing maintenance. the commission also notes that the cspe also aimed to fund tariff equalisation with the overseas territories. but as far as the objective of financing tariff equalisation is concerned, self-generators and final consumers in mainland france were in the same situation, as neither benefited from this service, but both were required to fund it in a spirit of solidarity. in addition, the self-generators in question did not contribute to the objectives of developing renewable energy or cogeneration either; indeed their production by definition using fossil fuels and not cogeneration even went against those objectives. (213) france has also maintained that the partial exemption of self-generation, up to 240 gwh, was generally applicable. in this respect, the commission notes first that france has confirmed that the exemption in fact applied only to certain sectors (see recitals 35 and 36). secondly, the court of justice found, in its judgment of 21 december 2016 in commission v world duty free group (39), that a tax measure or charge is selective where it is established that it introduces, between operators that are, in the light of the objective pursued by the general tax system concerned, in a comparable factual and legal situation, a distinction that is not justified by the nature and general structure of that system. it has been shown in recitals 161 and 162 that the exemption did indeed introduce, between operators that were, in the light of the objective pursued by the general tax system concerned, in a comparable factual and legal situation, a distinction that was not justified by the nature and general structure of that system. (214) the commission consequently disagrees with the position adopted by france that is outlined in recitals 111 and 112. 5.1.4.3. impact on competition and trade between member states (215) the undertakings benefiting from these cspe exemptions were in competition with undertakings from other member states. they were self-generators who were not electricity producers but industrial undertakings active mainly in chemicals, iron and steel and petrochemicals, as indicated by france and noted in recital 78. consequently, these exemptions were likely to have an impact on competition and trade between member states. 5.1.4.4. conclusion on existence of aid (216) the commission concludes that the cspe exemptions granted for the self-generation of electricity that was not used to produce electricity and that was generated from sources other than renewable energy and high-efficiency cogeneration constituted state aid. 5.1.5. general conclusion on the existence of aid as regards the various components of the cspe and on the estimate of its amount (217) the cspe site cap and 0,5 % value added cap constituted state aid. (218) the exemptions granted to self-generating sites constituted aid, except where the electricity was consumed by the self-generator in order to produce electricity or where the exemption applied to electricity self-generated from renewable energy or high-efficiency cogeneration, in respect of the part of the cspe that funded renewable energy or high-efficiency cogeneration respectively. 5.2. unlawfulness of the aid (219) as the cspe reductions were implemented before being notified to the commission, the french authorities failed to meet their obligations under article 108(3) tfeu. (220) consequently, the commission concludes that the cspe site cap and 0,5 % value added cap and the exemptions granted to self-generators that constituted state aid were unlawful. 5.3. analysis of the aid measures based on the provisions of the guidelines applicable to environmental tax reductions (221) the commission has examined first of all whether the cspe could be regarded as an environmental tax within the meaning of section 3.7.1 of the 2014 guidelines, point 151 of the 2008 guidelines and point 6 of the 2001 guidelines. 5.3.1. the cspe was not an environmental tax within the meaning of section 3.7.1 of the 2014 guidelines, point 151 of the 2008 guidelines and point 6 of the 2001 guidelines (222) environmental taxes within the meaning of the 2014 guidelines (paragraph 167) are intended to increase the costs of environmentally harmful behaviour, thereby discouraging such behaviour (and increasing the level of environmental protection). the definition of an environmental tax in paragraph 167, in conjunction with the definition in paragraph 19(15) of those guidelines, therefore implies that the measures modify behaviour so that this is less harmful to the environment and include the environmental costs of the product or service concerned. a similar definition of the concept of environmental tax also appears in the 2008 guidelines (point 70(14), in conjunction with point 151) and in the 2001 guidelines (point 6). (223) in the present case, the amount of the cspe was not determined based on an incentive effect aimed at reducing polluting behaviour or internalising the environmental impact of the electricity consumed. the specific tax base did not necessarily have a negative effect on the environment, as the cspe was also payable on electricity generated from renewable energy sources: it was payable on all electricity consumption, regardless of the impact on the environment of the electricity consumed. furthermore, the cspe was not intended to orient producers and consumers towards activities better respecting the environment. in fact a reduction in consumption would have led to the need to increase the cspe payable, in order to cover the costs of producing renewable energy and the other policies to be financed. (224) in addition, the commission also notes that paragraph 181 of the 2014 guidelines explicitly states that the funding of support to energy from renewable sources through charges does as such not target a negative externality and accordingly has no direct environmental effect. (225) thus the cspe was not an environmental tax within the meaning of paragraphs 167 and 181 of the 2014 guidelines, nor was it within the scope of point 70(14) and 151 of the 2008 guidelines or section e.3.2 of the 2001 guidelines, even if it resulted in an increase in electricity prices. (226) consequently, the commission does not agree with france's assessment regarding the nature of the cspe outlined in recital 82. 5.3.2. it has not been demonstrated by france that the cspe was a harmonised environmental tax within the meaning of directive 2003/96/ec (227) the commission points out first of all that france has at no time asserted or demonstrated that the cspe was a harmonised environmental tax within the meaning of directive 2003/96/ec. rather, france maintains that the provisions of directive 2003/96/ec are applicable by analogy, thus accepting, as it did prior to the opening of the proceeding, that the cspe was not a harmonised energy tax within the meaning of directive 2003/96/ec. (228) the commission also notes that the cspe cannot be regarded as a harmonised tax within the meaning of directive 2003/96/ec because the revenue collected was not allocated to the general budget. (229) the commission therefore confirms the conclusions that it reached in recital 155 of the opening decision. it does not confirm the comments made by france that are outlined in recitals 81 and 84 to 87. 5.3.3. inapplicability of section 3.7.1 of the 2014 guidelines and of the previous guidelines as a basis for the compatibility of the measure with the internal market 5.3.3.1. inapplicability of section 3.7.1 of the 2014 guidelines and of the previous guidelines as a basis for the compatibility of the measure (230) as the cspe was not an environmental tax, section 3.7.1 of the 2014 guidelines, on reductions in environmental taxes, is not applicable. (231) likewise, point 151 of the 2008 guidelines, which laid down the conditions for the compatibility of reductions in environmental taxes before the 2014 guidelines entered into force, is not applicable. (232) the commission consequently does not agree with the comments made by france that are outlined in recitals 88 and 90. 5.3.3.2. inapplicability, whether direct or by analogy, of paragraphs 173 to 175 of the 2014 guidelines, points 152 and 153 of the 2008 guidelines and point 49 of the 2001 guidelines as a basis for the compatibility of the measure with the internal market (233) as it has not been shown that the cspe was a harmonised environmental tax or even an environmental tax, as indicated in section 5.3.2, it follows that paragraphs 173 to 175 of the 2014 guidelines, points 152 and 153 of the 2008 guidelines and point 49 of the 2001 guidelines are not applicable to the cspe, given that they apply only to harmonised environmental taxes. (234) even if the cspe were to be regarded as an environmental tax, it would be a non-harmonised environmental tax, for which paragraphs 176 to 178 of the 2014 guidelines set out specific compatibility criteria. paragraphs 173 to 175 of the 2014 guidelines are therefore under no circumstances applicable by analogy. (235) for the same reasons, points 152 and 153 of the 2008 guidelines, on reductions of harmonised taxes, which applied before 1 july 2014, cannot provide a basis for compatibility with the internal market that would apply to the reductions in the cspe, which was not a harmonised environmental tax. the 2008 guidelines also contain compatibility criteria for non-harmonised environmental taxes. as a result, even if the cspe were to be regarded as a non-harmonised environmental tax, it would have to be analysed, not by analogy in the light of points 152 and 153 of the 2008 guidelines, but in the light of points 154 to 159 of those guidelines. 5.3.4. non-compliance of the measures with paragraphs 176 to 178 of the 2014 guidelines and with the previous guidelines if the cspe were to be regarded as a non-harmonised environmental tax (236) the commission finds that, if the cspe were to be regarded as a non-harmonised environmental tax, which has not been shown by france in the present case, the cspe reductions could not be regarded as compatible even then. 5.3.4.1. non-compliance with paragraphs 176 to 178 of the 2014 guidelines (237) firstly, it has not been demonstrated, as required by paragraph 177(a) of the 2014 guidelines, that the aid was granted in the same way for all competitors in the same sector if they were in a similar factual situation. in particular, the cspe 0,5 % value added cap, which applied only to industrial customers consuming over 7 gwh, created discrimination between competitors active in the same market sector: although the cspe was the same in relation to their value added, the exemption was granted only where consumption reached a certain threshold, which automatically excluded the smallest undertakings in a given sector from the benefit of the exemption. (238) secondly, with reference to paragraph 177(b) of the 2014 guidelines, there has been no sufficient quantification of the impact that the environmental surcharge, without the reduction, may have had on the increase in production costs, calculated as a proportion of the gross value added for each beneficiary and for the entire 2003 to 2015 period. in general, it has not been demonstrated, as required by paragraph 177(c) of the 2014 guidelines, that this increase in production costs could not have been passed on without leading to significant sales reductions. (239) thirdly, the cspe reductions did not guarantee payment of the minimum of 20 % required by paragraph 178(a). in fact it appears that in many cases the minimum of 20 % was not paid. as an example, the information provided by france shows that, in 2014, 203 beneficiaries paid a level of cspe that was less than 20 %. (240) as a result, even if the cspe were to be regarded as a non-harmonised energy tax, the compliance of the cspe reductions with situation 2 of section 3.7.1 of the 2014 guidelines has not been demonstrated. 5.3.4.2. non-compliance with the 2008 guidelines (241) firstly, the commission considers that the requirements of point 155 of the 2008 guidelines, according to which france must, for each beneficiary, provide the list of sectors by properly describing them and describe the situation of beneficiaries, have not been met. (242) secondly, it has not been shown, as required by point 158(a) of the 2008 guidelines, that the aid was granted in the same way for all competitors in the same sector if they were in a similar factual situation. in particular, the cspe 0,5 % value added cap, which applied only to industrial customers consuming over 7 gwh, created discrimination between competitors active in the same sector or market (see also recital 237). (243) thirdly, it has not been shown, as required by point 158(b) of the 2008 guidelines, that the tax without reduction would have led to a substantial increase in production costs for each sector or category of individual beneficiaries benefiting from the site cap. (244) fourthly, it has not been shown, as required by point 158(c) of the 2008 guidelines, that the increase in production costs resulting from the application of the cspe could not have been passed on through sales prices without leading to important sales reductions. (245) fifthly, it has not been shown, as required by point 159(a) of the 2008 guidelines, that the amount paid in cspe by beneficiaries of the aid was equivalent to the environmental performance of each beneficiary compared with the performance related to the best performing technique, nor that beneficiaries paid at least 20 % of the cspe. rather, it has been established that certain beneficiaries paid less than 20 % of the cspe, contrary to the requirements of point 178(a). as an example, the information provided by france shows that a significant number of beneficiaries paid a level of cspe that was less than 20 % in 2014. (246) the commission therefore disagrees with the comments made by france that are set out in recital 90. 5.3.4.3. non-compliance with the 2001 guidelines (40) (247) firstly, given the levels of cspe paid by beneficiaries, which were sometimes very insignificant, the commission considers that the cspe reductions did not meet the requirements of point 51(1)(b) of the 2001 guidelines, which provides that the firms eligible for the reduction must nevertheless pay a significant proportion of the national tax. as an example, for the years for which france has provided detailed information by beneficiary, it appears that 202 beneficiaries paid less than 20 % of the cspe. (248) secondly, the tax in question must have a positive impact in terms of environmental protection, as specified by point 51(2)(b). since at least part of the cspe was used to fund tariff equalisation and social tariffs, the tax was in any event not exclusively intended to have a positive impact in terms of environmental protection. in addition, it was not the tax as such that had a positive impact on the environment, but only the measures partly funded by it, so that points 51 et seq. of the 2001 guidelines are not applicable in the present case. (249) thirdly, with regard to the cspe 0,5 % value added cap, which was introduced after the cspe was adopted, france has not shown that the exemption had been decided at the time of the cspe's adoption, or that it was justified by a significant change in economic conditions that placed the firms in a particularly difficult competitive situation. the amount of the reduction in the cspe did not exceed the increase in costs resulting from the change in economic conditions following adoption of the charge. consequently, it has not been shown that the cspe reductions granted by france over the 2003 to 2011 period complied with point 51(2)(b) of the 2001 guidelines. in addition, with regard to the cspe site cap, there was no limitation to 10 years, as required by point 51(1) of the 2001 guidelines. (250) the commission therefore disagrees with the comments made by france that are outlined in recital 89. 5.4. compliance of the cspe reductions with section 3.7.2 of the 2014 guidelines and article 107(3)(c) tfeu (251) in so far as the cspe was used to fund renewable energy, the commission has assessed the compliance of the reduction on the basis of the 2014 guidelines, sections 3.7.2 (aid in the form of reductions in the funding of support for energy from renewable sources) and 3.7.3 (transitional rules for aid granted to reduce the burden related to funding support for energy from renewable sources). in so far as the cspe was used to fund support measures other than support for renewable energy, the commission has also assessed the compliance of the reduction on the basis of article 107(3) tfeu. 5.4.1. compliance of the cspe reductions in so far as the cspe funded the production of electricity from renewable energy (252) section 3.7.2 of the 2014 guidelines sets out how the commission analyses the compatibility with the internal market of aid in the form of reductions in funding support for electricity from renewable sources. in so far as the cspe partly funded the production of electricity from renewable energy, the commission has analysed the compatibility of the reductions in the cspe allocated to fund generation from renewable energy in the light of sections 3.7.2 and 3.7.3 of the 2014 guidelines. (253) paragraph 182 of the 2014 guidelines explains that to the extent that the costs of financing renewable energy support are recovered from energy consumers, they should be recovered in a way that does not discriminate between consumers of energy. however, some targeted reductions in these costs may be needed to secure a sufficient financing base for support to energy from renewable sources and hence help reaching the renewable energy targets set at eu level in order to avoid that undertakings particularly affected by the financing costs of renewable energy support are put at a significant competitive disadvantage, member states may wish to grant partial compensation for these additional costs. without such compensation the financing of renewable support may be unsustainable and public acceptance of setting up ambitious renewable energy support measures may be limited. 5.4.1.1. limited reductions in the part of the cspe that funded renewable energy (254) as a preliminary point, france asserts that support for the production of electricity from the incineration of waste must be 50 % in order to be regarded as support for renewable energy. the commission agrees with this analysis, given that france has justified this percentage based on public statistics (international energy agency and eurostat), as stated in recital 134, which indicate that incinerated waste accounts for 50 % of biodegradable waste and therefore constitutes a source of renewable energy within the meaning of paragraph 19(5) and (6) of the 2014 guidelines. (255) paragraph 184 of the 2014 guidelines provides that, in order to ensure that the aid serves to facilitate the funding of support to energy from renewable sources, member states will need to demonstrate that the additional costs reflected in higher electricity prices faced by the beneficiaries result only from the support to energy from renewable sources. the additional costs resulting from the part of the cspe that funded renewable energy consequently could not exceed the amount of the contributions that funded support for renewable energy. (256) in the present case, the cre checked that the contributions collected from final consumers for the renewable energy support did not exceed the cost of supporting renewable energy (and all the other policies funded by the cspe), as explained in recitals 14 and 15. in particular, the cre checked that the costs declared by accountable purchasers for funding support to sources of renewable energy did not exceed the costs of the support, namely the difference between the amounts paid by accountable purchasers to producers of renewable energy and the market price that accountable purchasers secured by selling the electricity produced from sources of renewable energy. the cre even developed a method of determining the reference market price so as to encourage operators to successfully sell the electricity produced from sources of renewable energy. consequently, the commission concludes that the requirements of paragraph 184 of the 2014 guidelines were met. 5.4.1.2. aid limited to electro-intensive sectors and undertakings exposed to international trade (257) paragraphs 185 and 186 of the 2014 guidelines specify that the aid should be limited to sectors that are exposed to a risk in terms of maintaining their place in the market due to the cost of funding electricity produced from renewable energy. (258) in addition, the aid can be granted only if the undertaking belongs to one of the sectors listed in annex 3 to the 2014 guidelines, or if it has both an electro-intensity of at least 20 % and an exposure to international trade of at least 4 % at union level. (259) a list of the mining and manufacturing sectors not included on the list of annex 3 to the 2014 guidelines having an exposure to international trade of at least 4 % is provided in annex 5 to the 2014 guidelines. (260) the commission notes that france has recognised that undertakings benefited from cspe reductions or exemptions even though they were not eligible under the criteria laid down by the 2014 guidelines, either because they were not active in any of the sectors listed in annexes 3 and 5 to the 2014 guidelines, or because they were active in a sector listed in annex 5 to the 2014 guidelines but did not have an electro-intensity of at least 20 %. 5.4.1.3. proportionality under section 3.7.2 of the 2014 guidelines (261) paragraph 188 of the 2014 guidelines states that the aid will be considered to be proportionate if the aid beneficiaries pay at least 15 % of the additional costs without reduction. (262) paragraph 189 of the 2014 guidelines also recognises that, given the significant increase in surcharges levied to fund renewable energy, a contribution of 15 % of the surcharge amount might go beyond what undertakings particularly affected by the burden can bear. consequently, member states have the possibility to limit the amount of the surcharge to 4 % of value added if the undertaking has an electro-intensity of less than 20 %, and to 0,5 % of value added if the electro-intensity of that undertaking is at least 20 %. (263) in the present case, the commission finds that, for 2014 alone, at least 124 beneficiaries paid a level of cspe (to fund support for renewable energy) of less than 15 %, which did not comply with paragraph 188 of the 2014 guidelines. in addition, france granted cspe reductions of 0,5 % of value added according to a consumption criterion, and not according to an explicit criterion of electro-intensity. likewise, the criterion for the cspe site cap was not the electro-intensity criterion of the 2014 guidelines. consequently, the commission concludes that france has not shown that the proportionality rules laid down by the 2014 guidelines were fully observed. the commission therefore disagrees with the comments made by france that are summarised in recitals 105 and 106. 5.4.1.4. adjustment plan (264) paragraphs 193 and 194 of the 2014 guidelines provide that member states are to apply the eligibility and proportionality criteria set out in section 3.7.2 of the 2014 guidelines at the latest by 1 january 2019. the commission notes that france submitted an adjustment plan providing for a progressive increase in the minimum contribution to be paid so that the reduction that was applied to the part of the cspe intended to fund support for renewable energy complied with the requirements of section 3.7.2 of the 2014 guidelines at the latest by 1 january 2019. it also decided to abolish the cspe in 2016. (265) paragraph 195 of the 2014 guidelines allows an adjustment plan to progressively reach the aid levels resulting from the application of the eligibility and proportionality criteria set out in section 3.7.2 of the 2014 guidelines in order to avoid an abrupt increase in the surcharge to be paid by individual undertakings. (266) in addition, paragraph 196 of the 2014 guidelines specifies that, to the extent that aid was granted in respect of a period before the date of application of the 2014 guidelines, the adjustment plan must also provide for a progressive application of the eligibility and proportionality criteria for that period. (267) under paragraph 197 of the 2014 guidelines, to the extent that aid in the form of a reduction in the burden related to funding support for electricity from renewable sources, or exemption from that burden, was granted before the date of application of the 2014 guidelines to undertakings not eligible under the criteria laid down in section 3.7.2 of the 2014 guidelines, the aid can be declared compatible if the adjustment plan provides for a minimum contribution of 20 % to be reached at the latest by 1 january 2019. (268) france has not got statistics for every year; the information france has provided for certain years for which it has statistics shows that in those years a significant number of beneficiaries obtained reductions in excess of the levels of reduction permitted by the 2014 guidelines. in 2004, for example, 124 beneficiaries of the 0,5 % value added cap on the cspe paid a rate of cspe less than 15 % of the maximum level, and 202 beneficiaries paid less than 20 %. in addition, 27 beneficiaries of the site cap paid less than 15 % of the cspe and 39 beneficiaries paid less than 20 %. the commission also notes that the 934 beneficiaries of the 0,5 % value added cap on the cspe belonged to 135 different sectors (131 nace codes), i.e. a base wider than that permitted by annex 3 to the 2014 guidelines (68 nace codes). (269) france has accordingly submitted an adjustment plan under which the levels of reduction granted under the measures in question would be brought down to levels complying with the 2014 guidelines and the levels of cspe to be paid would be determined. the details and terms of this adjustment plan have been outlined in section 4.4. the commission considers, first of all, that this adjustment plan meets the requirements of section 3.7.3 of the 2014 guidelines. in particular, france has undertaken to check that, for those beneficiaries belonging to one of the sectors listed in annex 3 to the 2014 guidelines and for those beneficiaries having an electro-intensity of at least 20 % and at the same time belonging to one of the sectors listed in annex 5 to the 2014 guidelines, the amount of cspe paid to fund support for renewable energy was at least one of the following values: 15 % of the amount of cspe intended to fund support for renewable energy; 4 % of its value added, if the undertaking had an electro-intensity less than 20 %; 0,5 % of its value added, if the undertaking had an electro-intensity of at least 20 %. (270) if this is not the case, france has undertaken to check that the amount of cspe paid to fund support for renewable energy reached at least the level of contribution required by the adjustment plan based on the progression rule described in recital 140. lastly, france has explained that, if the contribution paid by a beneficiary does not correspond to the amount required by the adjustment plan, the difference between the contribution already paid and the contribution payable under the adjustment plan will be recovered. (271) in accordance with paragraph 197 of the 2014 guidelines, france has undertaken to check that beneficiaries who were not eligible under section 3.7.2 of the 2014 guidelines, but who benefited from cspe reductions before 1 july 2014, paid at least 20 % of the cspe intended to fund support for renewable energy. if this is the case, no additional adjustment will be required. if this is not the case, a gradual adjustment plan will be applied, which will progressively increase the annual amount of cspe to be paid so that it reaches 20 % of the cspe intended to fund support for renewable energy by 1 january 2019 at the latest. if the contribution paid by a beneficiary does not correspond to the amount required by the adjustment plan, france will recover the difference between the contribution already paid and the contribution payable under the adjustment plan. as france decided to abolish the cspe with effect from 2016, the adjustment plan does not have to be applied beyond 31 december 2015. (272) beneficiaries not eligible under section 3.7.2 of the 2014 guidelines and not having benefited from cspe reductions before 1 july 2014 will have to pay 100 % of the cspe intended to fund support for renewable energy by 1 january 2019 at the latest. (273) the commission notes that the version of the adjustment plan proposed by france on 23 november 2017, and described in section 4.4, is based on an extensive and detailed analysis of the situation of each beneficiary with regard to the cspe. consequently, the commission considers that paragraphs 198 to 200 of the 2014 guidelines have been observed by france. (274) lastly, the commission notes that paragraph 248 of the 2014 guidelines allows the adjustment plan to start in 2011. pursuant to this paragraph, the commission considers that the reductions applied to the part of the cspe intended to fund support for renewable energy before 1 january 2011 can be declared compatible with the internal market. 5.4.1.5. conclusion on the compatibility of the measure with the internal market (275) based on the information in recitals 115 to 148, the commission concludes that the adjustment plan submitted by france and described in section 4.4 is compatible with section 3.7.3 of the 2014 guidelines in so far as it concerns the part of the cspe intended to fund support for renewable energy. likewise, the cspe exemptions, in so far as the cspe funded the production of electricity from renewable energy, were compatible with section 3.7.3 of the 2014 guidelines and with article 107(3)(c) tfeu to the extent that the reductions granted did not exceed the permitted reductions based on the adjustment plan and provided that the minimum amount of the part of the cspe intended to fund support for renewable energy was paid as described in recitals 269 to 272. (276) however, the commission concludes that any aid amount exceeding the levels permitted by the adjustment plan must be regarded as incompatible with the internal market and must be recovered. in this respect, the commission validates the terms of the adjustment plan defined by france and outlined in section 4.4 of this decision. 5.4.2. compatibility with the internal market of the cspe reductions in so far as the cspe funded energy policies other than developing the production of electricity from renewable energy (277) the commission notes first of all that the compatibility with the internal market of the cspe reductions in so far as the cspe funded support schemes other than support for the production of electricity from renewable energy cannot be assessed in the light of section 3.7.1 of the 2014 guidelines, or in the light of sections 3.7.2 and 3.7.3 of those guidelines: (278) on the one hand, the commission considers that the cspe reductions granted in respect of support schemes for cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs cannot be classified as environmental taxes, for the reasons set out above in recitals 223 to 225. (279) on the other hand, sections 3.7.2 and 3.7.3 of the 2014 guidelines apply only to reductions in charges intended to fund support for renewable energy. they do not cover reductions in surcharges intended to fund measures supporting cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs. (280) as no other guidelines apply to the reductions granted in respect of these components of the cspe, the commission has examined the compatibility of the measures with the internal market in the light of article 107(3)(c) tfeu. the commission can declare an aid measure to be compatible directly under article 107(3)(c) tfeu if it contributes to an objective of common interest, if it is adequate and necessary for achieving that objective and proportionate, and if its positive effects outweigh the negative effects on competition and trade. (281) the commission has previously concluded that exemptions from charges other than those intended to fund renewable energy can be regarded as pursuing an objective of common interest. in particular, the commission noted in its sa.38635 (41) and sa.42393 (42) decisions that reductions in electricity charges intended to fund high-efficiency cogeneration can be regarded as contributing to an objective of common interest and as being adequate and necessary for achieving that objective if they are necessary to maintain the charges ensuring the funding of support for the policy, which itself constitutes a policy of common interest. (282) the commission has examined whether the cspe used to fund high-efficiency cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs served an objective of common interest and whether the reductions were necessary to maintain the funding stability of those policies. 5.4.2.1. objective of common interest high-efficiency cogeneration (283) recital 38 to directive 2012/27/eu of the european parliament and of the council (43) defines high-efficiency cogeneration as cogeneration allowing energy savings calculated according to annex ii to the directive. according to that annex ii high-efficiency cogeneration must meet two criteria. firstly, cogeneration production must provide primary energy savings of at least 10 % compared with the references for separate production of heat and electricity. secondly, production from small-scale and micro-cogeneration units providing primary energy savings may qualify as high-efficiency cogeneration. (284) in the present case, as outlined in recital 10(b), france has explained that the cogeneration facilities funded by the cspe were, on the one hand, cogeneration facilities with an energy efficiency in excess of 65 % and, on the other hand, high-efficiency natural gas cogeneration facilities of more than 12 mw. france has confirmed that all these facilities met the high-efficiency unit criteria as defined by directive 2012/27/eu (44). (285) the commission also shares france's view that support for the incineration of non-biodegradable waste used for high-efficiency cogeneration can likewise be regarded as support for high-efficiency cogeneration (see also recital 134). (286) the commission notes that the promotion of high-efficiency cogeneration is recognised as an objective of common interest given that it contributes to the efficient production of energy and reduces carbon emissions, but that these positive externalities are not entirely reflected in prices, so that high-efficiency cogeneration does not generally develop spontaneously without additional support (see point 51 of the 2008 guidelines). it is for that reason that the commission permits operating aid for high-efficiency cogeneration (see paragraphs 138, 139 and151 of the 2014 guidelines, section 3.1.7 of the 2008 guidelines and section e.3.4 of the 2001 guidelines) (45). the commission therefore agrees with the comments made by france that are outlined in recital 99(1). common interest of a reduction in the cspe intended to fund tariff equalisation (287) the commission notes first of all that the funding of measures aimed at limiting energy costs in remote regions pursues an objective of common interest. this funding is justified firstly by the regional cohesion imperative laid down in article 3(3) teu. in addition, article 174 tfeu provides that the european union shall develop and pursue its actions leading to the strengthening of its economic, social and territorial cohesion. in particular, the union shall aim at reducing disparities between the levels of development of the various regions and the backwardness of the least favoured regions. among the regions concerned, particular attention shall be paid to rural areas, areas affected by industrial transition, and regions which suffer from severe and permanent natural or demographic handicaps such as the northernmost regions with very low population density and island, cross-border and mountain regions. lastly, article 349 tfeu stresses the need to take into account the special characteristics and constraints of the outermost regions. (288) as regards the outermost regions, which benefit significantly from tariff equalisation, the commission itself stressed, in its recent communication on the outermost regions (46), the need to improve efforts to enable the outermost regions to reap fully the benefits of eu membership and harness globalisation. as regards the energy sector, the communication explicitly recognises the problem of that these territories may be insufficiently connected to the continental energy grids and may therefore need to receive subsidies in order to avoid high electricity prices. (289) in addition, the commission has already approved measures funded by the member states in favour of insufficiently connected territories aimed at capping electricity prices and thereby avoiding too much of a difference with prices on the mainland (47). (290) consequently, the commission concludes that an objective of common interest is pursued by the part of the cspe allocated to fund tariff equalisation. (291) the commission therefore agrees with the comments made by france that are outlined in recital 99(2). common interest of a reduction in the cspe intended to fund social tariffs (292) the commission observes first of all that the cspe component intended to fund social tariffs pursues an objective of common interest. this is clearly expressed by article 3 teu and article 174 tfeu, which explicitly make social and economic cohesion an objective of the european union. (293) these objectives are also identified in the secondary legislation of the european union applicable in the area of electricity. in particular, recital 45 to directive 2009/72/ec (the energy directive) provides that member states should ensure that household customers and small enterprises, enjoy the right to be supplied with electricity of a specified quality at clearly comparable, transparent and reasonable prices. recital 53 of that directive encourages the adoption of measures and the development of national action plans to tackle energy poverty. article 3(7) of the same directive expressly requires member states to take appropriate measures to protect final customers, and in particular vulnerable customers. lastly, the communication from the commission entitled clean energy for all europeans (48) stresses the need to protect the most vulnerable consumers. (294) the commission concludes that the part of the cspe allocated to fund social tariffs does pursue an objective of common interest. (295) the commission therefore agrees with the comments made by the uniden association that are outlined in recital 71 and the comments made by france that are outlined in recital 99(3). 5.4.2.2. appropriateness and necessity (296) the commission has examined whether the cspe reductions can be regarded as necessary to maintain funding of the support measures for high-efficiency cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs. (297) the commission recognises that reductions granted to electro-intensive undertakings in the cspe allocated to fund social tariffs can be justified by the need to ensure sufficient funding of the measure while avoiding a high cspe amount leading to an excessive burden on undertakings particularly sensitive to surcharges imposed on electricity consumption, namely electro-intensive undertakings exposed to international trade. an excessive burden could lead to the closure of undertakings, which would harm the sustainability of the funding for the support measures and ultimately the objectives pursued by those measures. (298) to prevent electricity consumers particularly affected by the costs of funding high-efficiency cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs, i.e. companies that are both electro-intensive and at risk of international competition, from becoming insolvent or relocating outside the european union, reductions in charges imposed on electricity consumption may prove necessary. the failure or relocation of too many companies could erode the financial basis of the funding. rather than paying a lower amount in cspe, the companies so affected would no longer contribute anything in this respect, and in order to fund the support for high-efficiency cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs a higher charge would have to be demanded from other consumers, thereby reducing the acceptability of the measures to the remaining contributors. (299) the commission notes in this respect that directive 2012/27/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 25 october 2012 on energy efficiency set a 20 % energy efficiency target along with national targets which high-efficiency cogeneration can significantly help to achieve. on 23 october 2014, the european council also set a 27 % target for an increase in energy efficiency by 2030. (300) consequently, the need to fund support for high-efficiency cogeneration may be significant. this is the case with france, bearing in mind that the share of the cspe allocated to fund cogeneration was 25 %, i.e. eur 1,7 billion. this came on top of the other components of the cspe, including the component intended to fund renewable energy, at eur 2,7 billion. (301) that charge was further increased by the funding of tariff equalisation and social tariffs, which were in addition to the other components of the cspe. the tariff equalisation and social tariff components of the cspe together accounted for 34 % of the cspe over the 2003-2014 period, i.e. eur 12,7 billion. (302) the commission accepts that, given the significant scale of the cspe (cspe of eur 19,5/mwh, compared with a day-ahead base price of eur 38,8/mwh for the same year), and the substantial increase in the cspe over the period 2003-2015 (+ 550 %), france judged it necessary to provide for reductions in the cspe for those undertakings most sensitive to the increased burden. (303) the commission also notes that the measures were appropriate to achieve the objective of common interest pursued. the commission points out in this respect that all the support measures were related to the public electricity service in france: promotion of cogeneration in order to improve the energy efficiency of french electricity production and its impact on the environment, combating energy poverty by establishing social electricity tariffs, and guaranteed access to electricity at an equivalent price for less well-connected overseas territories that did not possess generating facilities equivalent to the facilities available on the mainland. it was therefore logical for france to want to finance the measures concerned through a compulsory charge on electricity consumption in france. conclusions on the existence of objectives of common interest and on the appropriateness and necessity of the measure (304) based on this information, the commission concludes that the reductions in the cspe intended to fund high-efficiency cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs can be considered to have contributed to objectives of common interest because they can be regarded as having been necessary to maintain thee relevant components of the cspe and ensure support for these policies. (305) the commission therefore agrees with the comments made by france that are outlined in recital 99(1) to 99(3). (306) however, while the pursuit of objectives of energy efficiency, combating energy poverty and maintaining territorial cohesion by keeping electricity tariffs at an equivalent level in mainland france and the overseas territories can be recognised as pursuing objectives of common interest, it should be stressed that improving or preserving the competitiveness of an undertaking cannot in itself and as a general rule be taken to constitute an objective of common interest within the meaning of article 107(3)(c) tfeu. (307) the commission emphasises that the assessment made here with regard to the objectives of common interest must not be regarded as a general and systematic acceptance of any reduction in taxes or surcharges borne by electro-intensive undertakings. (308) that a reduction in the cspe served an objective of common interest has been acknowledged only in so far as the reduction ensured stable funding of support measures pursuing a proven objective of common interest falling within the union's energy policies. (309) in this respect, the commission disagrees with the comments made by alfi outlined in recital 67, the comments made by uniden outlined in recital 71, and the comments made by france outlined in recitals 100 to 102, which suggest that the prevention of a risk to competitiveness and relocation is an objective of common interest. improving the competitiveness of certain undertakings to the detriment of their competitors cannot in itself be regarded as an objective of common interest within the meaning of article 107(3)(c) tfeu. 5.4.2.3. incentive effect, proportionality and absence of undue distortion of competition (310) the commission observes that, if reductions in surcharges intended to fund high-efficiency cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs are too big, or are granted to too many sectors or beneficiaries, the overall charge intended to fund these measures can also be threatened and public acceptance of these measures can be compromised. the distortions of competition and the impact on trade caused by such reductions can also be significant. (311) to assess the compatibility with the internal market of this type of reduction, the commission indicated in its decisions on state aid measures sa.42393 and sa.38635 that paragraphs 185 to 187 of the 2014 guidelines form a relevant basis for identifying those undertakings most sensitive to the introduction of charges on electricity consumption and for determining the incentive effect of the aid. this seems to be particularly justified here, given that, on the one hand, the support for high-efficiency cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs was funded by the cspe and served objectives of common interest connected with the energy sector, as did the support for renewable energy, and that, on the other hand, the part of the cspe allocated to high-efficiency cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs was in addition to the renewable component of the cspe. all these components of the cspe were structured and levied in an identical and undifferentiated manner. given that the cspe was charged on the amount of electricity consumed, it would necessarily have a particular impact on companies for which the cost of energy represented a large part of their value added, and which could not easily pass on these costs to end consumers without losing market share, given the exposure to international trade of the sectors in which they operated. these are undertakings that can be identified using the criteria specified in paragraphs 185 to 187 of the 2014 guidelines. (312) the commission also indicated in its sa.42393 and sa.38635 decisions that it can use paragraphs 188 and 189 of the 2014 guidelines as a basis for assessing the proportionality of reductions in surcharges intended to fund high-efficiency cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs. this seems appropriate here given that, on the one hand, the high-efficiency cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs pursued objectives of common interest connected with the energy sector, as did the support for renewable energy which was also provided by the cspe, and that, on the other hand, the reductions granted aimed to ensure the sustainable funding of these support measures while limiting the burden on companies particularly affected by the energy surcharges but nevertheless requiring them to make a sufficient contribution. the criteria set out in paragraphs 188 and 189 of the 2014 guidelines serve to define the necessary balance. (313) the commission notes in this regard that many eligible beneficiaries were electro-intensive undertakings within the meaning of paragraphs 185 to 187 of the 2014 guidelines and that a number of beneficiaries contributed the minimum required, i.e. 15 % of the charge. 5.4.2.4. adjustment plan (314) for those beneficiaries that cannot be classified as electro-intensive undertakings within the meaning of paragraphs 185 to 187 of the 2014 guidelines and for those that, while being electro-intensive within the meaning of those paragraphs, did not pay at least 15 % of the cspe or 0,5 % of value added as the case may be, france has submitted an adjustment plan (see section 4.4) which would gradually increase their contribution to 15 % (for electro-intensive undertakings within the meaning of paragraphs 185 to 187 of the 2014 guidelines) and 100 % (for non-electro-intensive undertakings) by 1 january 2019 at the latest. as the cspe was abolished on 1 january 2016, however, the adjustment plan will be applied only in respect of the years up to 31 december 2015. (315) this adjustment plan involves a cumulative adjustment that covers all the reductions in the cspe that jointly funded renewable energy, cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs and whose compatibility with the internal market the commission has assessed in sections 5.4.1 and 5.4.2. (316) the commission considers that the adjustment plan is justified for the same reasons that justify the plan applied to the renewable component of the cspe. in particular, this adjustment plan avoids the excessively abrupt increase in the financial burden to be borne by consumers no longer benefiting from the cspe reductions that would result from the application of the proportionality criteria defined in paragraphs 185 and 189 of the 2014 guidelines, and thus contributes to the sustainability of the support for high-efficiency cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs, while maintaining the acceptability of the support and its continued and secure funding. start date of the adjustment plans (317) the commission approves the start dates of the adjustment plans. (318) as regards high-efficiency cogeneration, the commission considers that the starting point of the adjustment plan for the reductions in the cspe intended to fund renewable energy and cogeneration, which is set for 2011, is justified. in june 2010 the european council set a target of 20 % energy efficiency to be achieved by 2020. during 2010 and 2011, the european union adopted several action plans and communications (49) stressing the importance of energy efficiency and the need to improve efforts in this respect in the area of electricity generation, including through funding by taxes. these calls, together with the energy efficiency directive, which encourages member states to intensify support measures, thereby in turn increasing financing costs, justify starting the plan in 2011. (319) the commission considers that the reductions granted before these reference years are caught by the prohibition in article 107(1) tfeu, but that in the light of the limited scale of such measures before 2011 (before the 20 % target was set) the amounts involved can be regarded as being covered by article 2 of council regulation (ec) no 994/98 (50) on de minimis aid, which was applicable at the time, or as compatible under article 107(3)(b) tfeu, given that the reductions granted between december 2008 and december 2010 fell within the scope of the temporary community framework for state aid measures to support access to finance in the current financial and economic crisis (in particular section 4.2.2 thereof) (51) and were covered by commission decision n 7/09 (52). (320) as regards the other components funded by the cspe, the starting point of the adjustment plan for the reductions in the cspe intended to fund tariff equalisation and social tariffs is set for 2004: the commission considers this is justified in the light of the ten-year limitation period applicable in this case pursuant to article 17 of regulation (eu) 2015/1589. (321) of the beneficiaries classified as electro-intensive undertakings within the meaning of paragraphs 185 to 187 of the 2014 guidelines, france has shown that some paid at least 15 % cspe or 4 % or 0,5 % value added. for those beneficiaries paying less than these thresholds, france has proposed applying an adjustment plan that would gradually bring their contribution to the minimum levels required (see section 4.4) so that, on the theoretical date of 1 january 2019, they would be paying at least 15 % cspe or 0,5 %/4 % value added as the case may be. (322) based on this information, in particular the commitment to apply an adjustment plan, the commission concludes that france has demonstrated that the reductions in the cspe intended to fund high-efficiency cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs were necessary and appropriate, had an incentive effect and did not unduly distort competition, and that they were therefore compatible under article 107(3)(c) tfeu in so far as they did not exceed the reductions set by the adjustment plan. (323) the commission adds that, in all other cases, the undertaking must pay 100 % of the surcharge by 1 january 2019. the cspe reductions granted in these other cases must therefore be recovered. in this respect, the commission approves the position proposed by france that is described in recitals 122 and 124. (324) consequently, the commission approves the terms of the adjustment plan, as set out in recitals 117 to 124 and in sections 4.4.5 to 4.4.8. 5.4.2.5. compatibility with the internal market of the reductions in the part of the cspe allocated to objectives other than the development of renewable energy, high-efficiency cogeneration, tariff equalisation and funding of social tariffs (325) the commission considers that france has not shown that the other components of the cspe funded support measures pursuing an objective of common interest, or that the reductions in the burden were necessary to pursue such objectives and that they were in proportion to what was needed to achieve the objective pursued. (326) in particular, with regard to the part of the cspe used to fund support for the production of energy from the incineration of non-biodegradable waste without using high-efficiency cogeneration, the commission generally permits support for the production of electricity from the incineration of waste only where that waste is biodegradable or where high-efficiency cogeneration is used. the production of electricity from the incineration of fossil waste does not generally require any support in order to be profitable, and it can pose problems in terms of the waste hierarchy. in particular, encouraging the production of electricity from fossil waste leads to co2 emissions, and may reduce the incentive to recycle or reuse the waste concerned. in addition, it may reduce the incentive to use the heat directly rather than convert it into electricity, whereas, in environmental terms, using the heat is preferable, as it is more energy-efficient. france has not shown that the support for the production of electricity from the incineration of fossil waste (and other non-biodegradable waste) did not result in an incentive to bypass the waste hierarchy and in particular to recycle the waste. in any event, france has not shown that the support measures funded by the cspe were necessary in order to encourage fossil waste incinerators to produce electricity, given market conditions. (327) france recognised in its memorandum of 23 november 2017 that reductions could not be applied to the part of the cspe allocated to fund incineration facilities using non-biodegradable resources. (328) secondly, france has not shown that the support funded by the cspe for peak-demand facilities was necessary to ensure security of supply, given all the measures already adopted by france to ensure security of supply and the prevailing market conditions between 2003 and 2015. furthermore, france has not shown that the hypothetical positive impact of the support for these peak-demand facilities counterbalanced its distorting effect on competition (in particular with regard to the diesel-type generators constructed in the 1990s). france has in fact concluded that the part of the cspe allocated to this objective should have been paid in full, which the commission confirms. (329) lastly, france has not demonstrated with sufficient cogency that the reductions in the part of the cspe allocated to measures intended to encourage independent generation, as a useful addition to the public electricity service, described in recital 11(3), pursued an objective of common interest. in general terms, the objective pursued has not been clearly established. the need for support has not been established either, and there is even less reason to believe that the hypothetical positive effects of these support measures counterbalanced their negative effects on competition. consequently, the appropriateness and necessity of the reductions concerning this aspect of the cspe have not been shown. france confirmed in its memorandum of 23 november 2017 that the part of the cspe allocated to this objective should have been paid in full, which the commission accepts. (330) the commission therefore endorses the analysis proposed by france which is set out in recital 124. 5.4.2.6. transparency (331) section 3.2.7 of the 2014 guidelines requires member states to publish certain information on aid beneficiaries from 1 july 2016 onward. as the measures ended on 1 january 2016, section 3.2.7 of the 2014 guidelines does not apply. 5.4.2.7. conclusion on the compatibility of the measure with the internal market (332) firstly, the commission concludes that the part of the cspe intended to fund various objectives other than renewable energy (including incineration of biodegradable waste), cogeneration (including incineration of non-biodegradable waste used in high-efficiency cogeneration), tariff equalisation, and social tariffs, must be paid in full and cannot be reduced. where necessary this part of the cspe must be recovered. (333) secondly, based on the information in recitals 251 to 274 regarding both the measures and the adjustment plan proposed, the commission concludes that france has sufficiently demonstrated that some of the cspe reductions were necessary and appropriate, had an incentive effect and did not distort competition, and that they were therefore compatible with article 107(3)(c) tfeu. (334) however, the commission concludes that any aid amount exceeding the levels permitted by the adjustment plan must be regarded as incompatible and must be reimbursed by the beneficiaries of the measure. in this respect, the commission validates the terms of the adjustment plan defined by france, as described in section 4.4 of this decision. 5.4.3. application of de minimis ceilings (335) the commission notes that france, as described in recital 135, has indicated its intention to apply the de minimis ceilings laid down by commission implementing regulation (eu) 2016/1046 (53) where the amount of aid is less than eur 200 000 over three years on a rolling basis for each of the reductions. (336) the commission wishes to make it clear that for those ceilings to be applicable the measures must comply with all the provisions of implementing regulation (eu) 2016/1046. 5.4.4. general conclusion (337) as explained in sections 5.4.1 and 5.4.2, and based on the information in recitals 252 to 334 regarding both the measures and the adjustment plan proposed, the commission concludes that france has satisfactorily demonstrated that some of the cspe reductions pursued an objective of common interest, were necessary and appropriate, had an incentive effect, were proportionate and did not distort competition to an extent contrary to the common interest, and that they were therefore compatible with article 107(3)(c) tfeu. (338) however, france has not shown that the aid in excess of the amounts of aid permitted by the adjustment plan pursued an objective of common interest, was necessary and appropriate, had an incentive effect, was proportionate and did not distort competition to an extent contrary to the common interest. this aid was therefore incompatible with article 107(3)(c) tfeu. the same applies to the reductions granted in the part of the cspe allocated to support measures other than support for renewable energy, high-efficiency cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs. (339) the commission approves the terms of the adjustment plan described by france, which are outlined in section 4.4 and clarified in recitals 329 and 334. 6. compliance with articles 30 and 110 tfeu (340) the court of justice has consistently held that taxes do not fall within the scope of the provisions of the treaty concerning state aid unless they constitute the method of financing an aid measure, so that they form an integral part of that measure (54). (341) moreover, paragraph 29 of the 2014 guidelines provides that, if a state aid measure or the conditions attached to it, including its financing method when it forms an integral part of it, entail a non-severable violation of union law, specifically articles 30 and 110 tfeu, the aid cannot be declared compatible with the internal market. (342) the commission has examined whether the cspe should be regarded as forming an integral part of the aid and whether, as a result, it should assess the compliance of the cspe, for example, with articles 30 and 110 tfeu. (343) according to settled case-law, in order for a tax to be regarded as forming an integral part of an aid measure, it must be hypothecated to the aid, i.e. to the support measures funded, under the relevant national rules. the revenue from the tax must necessarily be allocated to the financing of the support measures and have a direct impact on the amount of the aid and, consequently, on the assessment of the compatibility of the aid with the internal market (55). (344) the commission considers that this is not the case in this instance, for two reasons. (345) on the one hand, the cspe was a compulsory contribution used to fund support for renewable energy, high-efficiency cogeneration and other policies. it was not established to fund the exemptions examined in this decision. (346) it is clear from the case-law of the court of justice that a compulsory contribution used to fund a support measure does not form an integral part of that measure if the amount of the aid does not depend on the revenue obtained from the contribution. as a result, where financing from the budget is used in addition to a compulsory contribution to supplement the funding of aid, the compulsory contribution does not form an integral part of the aid measure (56). (347) the commission finds that, in the present case, the cspe was not hypothecated to the support scheme. although the cspe was allocated to fund the support scheme, the commission considers, however, that were was no hypothecation between the amount of the tax and the amount of the aid. it cannot be maintained that the revenue from the cspe had a direct impact on the amount of the aid scheme. the following graph illustrates the lack of hypothecation and shows that from 2007 onward the unit contribution applied did not cover the true cost of funding the measures supported: /mwh unit contribution applied unit contribution needed to cover public service costs 2014 2015 2013 2012 s2 2012 s1 2011 s2 2011 s1 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 changes in unit contribution source: cre (348) the difference was funded directly by edf. every year the cre determined the amount of contribution needed to cover the true cost of the policies that the cspe was intended to fund. (349) furthermore, in technical terms, the cspe was collected by edf, which was responsible for funding the policies that were in theory to be covered by the cspe. the difference between the cspe collected and the amounts disbursed by edf was over eur 5,3 billion. this difference can be seen in the following table (by year and by policy): differences between the cspe collected by edf and the true cost of the policies funded re incineration cogeneration tariff equalisation social tariffs peak-demand production miscellaneous total 2003 26 6 138 66 0 4 3 243 2004 5 1 17 10 0 1 0 34 2005 (22) (4) (98) (60) (12) (5) (3) (204) 2006 (3) (1) (38) (22) (2) (1) (1) (68) 2007 1 6 (70) (115) 1 (4) (1) (182) 2008 (5) 1 (19) (39) (2) (2) (1) (67) 2009 128 3 219 341 18 10 5 724 2010 119 (6) 223 197 17 7 5 562 2011 578 17 368 360 15 6 9 1 353 2012 514 2 221 317 21 3 3 1 081 2013 381 5 118 209 19 2 1 735 2014 708 7 117 322 54 2 1 1 211 2015 (19) 0 (3) (8) (1) 0 0 (31) 2 411 37 1 193 1 578 128 23 21 5 391 source: memorandum from the french authorities to the commission departments, 20 december 2016. (350) the edf deficit was subsequently reimbursed from the state budget (see article 5 of the amending finance law for 2015 no 2015-1786, on the composition of the special purpose account). (351) given the lack of hypothecation between the cspe and the measures supported, therefore, the compliance of the cspe with articles 30 and 110 tfeu does not need to be assessed. 7. recovery of aid (352) in accordance with the tfeu and the court of justice's established case-law, the commission is competent to decide that the member state concerned must abolish or alter aid when it has found that it is incompatible with the internal market (57). likewise, the court has consistently held that the aim of obliging a member state to abolish aid found by the commission to be incompatible with the internal market is to restore the previous situation (58). (353) the court has found that this aim is achieved once the beneficiary has repaid the amounts granted by way of unlawful aid. by repaying the aid, the beneficiary forfeits the advantage which it had enjoyed over its competitors on the market, and the situation prior to payment of the aid is restored (59). (354) in line with this case-law, article 16(1) of regulation (eu) 2015/1589 states that where negative decisions are taken in cases of unlawful aid, the commission shall decide that the member state concerned shall take all necessary measures to recover the aid from the beneficiary. (355) given that the measures in question were applied in breach of article 108 tfeu, they constitute unlawful aid. they are also incompatible and must therefore be recovered in order to restore the situation that existed on the market prior to their granting. the recovery must cover the period from the moment when the advantage was granted to the beneficiary, i.e. from the moment when the aid was made available to the beneficiary, to its actual recovery, and the sums to be recovered must bear interest up to the moment of their actual recovery. (356) consequently, the aid granted by france must be recovered to the extent that it was incompatible with the internal market. the recovery must cover only the cspe reductions granted between 2004 and 2015 in so far as they were intended to fund tariff equalisation and social tariffs, and between 2011 and 2015 in so far as they were intended to fund generation from renewable energy and high-efficiency cogeneration. (357) the amount to be recovered must be calculated for each year and for each beneficiary. it must be limited, for each year concerned, to the difference between the compatible amount for that year and the cspe amount actually paid. the compatible amount of cspe is determined in so far as it was intended to fund support for renewable energy, high-efficiency cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs in accordance with the adjustment plan. in so far as it was intended to fund objectives other than support for renewable energy, high-efficiency cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs, the compatible amount of cspe to be paid corresponds to all the cspe for the part of the cspe allocated to those other objectives. (358) for each beneficiary, for each year and for each policy, two amounts have to be calculated: the amount of cspe paid, and the amount of the minimum level of cspe to be paid based on the adjustment plan plus all the cspe used to fund support for objectives other than support for renewable energy, high-efficiency cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs. 7.1. calculation of the amounts actually paid in cspe (359) the amount of cspe actually paid by beneficiaries in a given year has to be arrived on the basis of information gathered by the french authorities. these amounts will be the outcome of the various cspe reductions. however, france has indicated that it does not yet have all the information needed, given that the data for 2003 to 2010 does not exist in electronic form. a precise calculation of the amount to be repaid, based on the paper records, has therefore yet to be made. (360) as regards beneficiaries of the cspe 0,5 % value added cap, the cspe actually paid is equal to the theoretical cspe determined by the adjustment plan or 0,5 % of value added, whichever is lower. if the value added is negative, the cspe amount regarded as paid is zero. this amount has then to be broken down by policy in line with the table in recital 133. (361) as regards beneficiaries of the site cap, the cspe actually paid is equal to the theoretical cspe determined by the adjustment plan or the amount of the site cap for the year in question, whichever is lower. this amount has likewise to be broken down by policy in line with the table submitted by france shown in recital 133. (362) as regards beneficiaries of the own consumption allowance, the cspe actually paid is equal to the difference between total consumption and exempt consumption, multiplied by the annual unit rate of cspe indicated in recital 133. (363) for each site benefiting from the site cap, it has to be determined whether that site belongs to an undertaking also benefiting from the 0,5 % value added cap. for each site benefiting from the own consumption allowance, it has to be determined whether that site belongs to an undertaking benefiting from the 0,5 % value added cap and whether that site also benefited from the site cap. (364) if a site benefiting from the site cap or own consumption allowance belongs to an undertaking benefiting from the 0,5 % value added cap, only the value added cap is to be taken into account, so that the benefit granted is not calculated twice. this is because if the undertaking benefits from the 0,5 % value added cap, which is known only in the following year, the repayment made a posteriori consists of the difference between the cspe paid and 0,5 % of the undertaking's value added. (365) in the case of a site benefiting from the site cap and own consumption allowance, but not belonging to an undertaking benefiting from the value added cap, then only the site cap is to be taken into account. 7.2. calculation of the amounts of cspe payable in accordance with the state aid rules and the adjustment plans 7.2.1. cspe to be paid and not subject to the adjustment plan (366) the commission considers first of all that the cspe that is payable in full by beneficiaries and excluded from the adjustment plan consists of the part of the cspe intended to fund the incineration of non-biodegradable waste or waste not used for high-efficiency cogeneration, support for peak-demand facilities, and support for various measures such as the funding of firm capacity contracts, described in recitals 11(1) to 11(3) and 325 to 330. for purposes of the application of the adjustment plan and the determination of the amount of aid to be recovered, the cspe already paid by beneficiaries can be assigned by priority to the funding of these other policies. 7.2.2. start date of the adjustment plans (367) the commission approves the start date of the adjustment plans indicated in recitals 275 and 318 to 321, for the part of the cspe intended to fund renewable energy and high-efficiency cogeneration and for the part intended to fund tariff equalisation and social tariffs. 7.2.3. calculation of the amounts of cspe to be paid and their gradual adjustment (368) the commission approves the method of calculating the sums to be paid for the various components of the cspe subject to an adjustment plan, as detailed in recitals 265 to 274 for the part of the cspe intended to fund renewable energy and in recitals 316 to 317 for the part of the cspe allocated to fund high-efficiency cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs. (369) the commission approves the principle and method of calculating the gradual adjustment of the cspe amounts to be paid, described in recital 140, which are based on a statistical law. (370) the commission approves the method of calculating the cspe to be paid, which involves applying the following rule for a given beneficiary and a given year: amount to be paid per year per policy funded = amount paid + (amount to be paid amount paid) [(e^n)-1]/[(e^n)-1] where n is the number of the year of the adjustment plan (e.g. for a plan starting in 2011 that must be fully applied in 2019, in 2011 n = 0, in 2012 n = 1, , in 2019 n = 8) and n is the number of years of the plan (e.g. for the same example, n = 8). (371) the commission also approves the method for taking account of the de minimis ceilings, as set out in recital 135. 7.3. calculation of the amounts to be recovered (372) the total amount of the sums to be recovered for each beneficiary is equal to the difference between (i) the cspe amounts payable in accordance with the state aid rules and (ii) the cspe amounts actually paid by eligible beneficiaries. (373) in this respect, the commission approves the method of calculating the sums to be recovered described by france, which is set out in recitals 145 to 148. 8. conclusions (374) the commission finds that france has unlawfully implemented the cspe caps in breach of article 108(3) tfeu, has adopted this decision: article 1 the exemptions from the cspe implemented by france for electricity self-generators under law no 2003-8 of 3 january 2003 on the gas and electricity markets and on the public energy service (law no 2003-8) do not constitute state aid, within the meaning of article 107(1) tfeu, where the electricity exempted from the cspe was consumed by the self-generator to produce electricity. article 2 the exemptions from the cspe implemented by france for self-generators of electricity produced from renewable energy under law no 2003-8 do not constitute state aid, within the meaning of article 107(1) tfeu, with regard to the part of the cspe that funded the generation of electricity from renewable energy. article 3 the exemptions from the cspe implemented by france for self-generators of electricity produced by high-efficiency cogeneration under law no 2003-8 do not constitute state aid, within the meaning of article 107(1) tfeu, with regard to the part of the cspe that funded high-efficiency cogeneration. article 4 the exemptions from the cspe implemented by france in breach of article 108(3) tfeu for electricity self-generators under law no 2003-8 constitute state aid which is compatible with the internal market, within the meaning of article 107(3)(c) tfeu, in cases other than those referred to in articles 1, 2 and 3 of this decision in so far as they are allocated to the funding of support for renewable energy, high-efficiency cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs and in so far as they did not exceed the amounts of the reductions in cspe permitted by the adjustment plan. article 5 the measures implemented by france in breach of article 108(3) tfeu in the form of cspe site caps and value added caps for electricity consumers under law no 2003-8 constitute state aid compatible with the internal market, within the meaning of article 107(3)(c) tfeu, in so far as they are allocated to the funding of support for renewable energy, high-efficiency cogeneration, tariff equalisation and social tariffs and in so far as they did not exceed the amounts of the reductions in cspe permitted by the adjustment plan. article 6 the commission accepts the adjustment plans notified by france. france shall inform the commission of the implementation of these plans in accordance with the terms set out in articles 10 and 11 and the deadlines set out in article 12. article 7 the cspe exemptions implemented by france in breach of article 108(3) tfeu to assist electricity self-generators under law no 2003-8 of 3 january 2003 on the gas and electricity markets and on the public energy service (law no 2003-8), and the measures implemented by france in breach of article 108(3) tfeu in the form of cspe site caps and value added caps outside the scope of articles 1 to 5 of this decision, constitute aid that is incompatible. france shall recover the unlawful and incompatible aid from the beneficiaries. article 8 any individual aid granted under the scheme referred to in article 7 does not constitute state aid if, at the time it was granted, it satisfied the conditions laid down by the regulation adopted pursuant to article 2 of regulation (ec) no 994/98 that was applicable at that time. article 9 any individual aid granted under the scheme referred to in article 7 which, at the time it was granted, satisfied the conditions laid down by a regulation adopted pursuant to article 1 of regulation (ec) no 994/98, or by any authorised aid scheme, is compatible with the internal market up to the maximum aid intensities applicable to that type of aid. article 10 1. the sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were placed at the disposal of the beneficiaries until the date of their actual recovery. 2. the interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with chapter v of commission regulation (ec) no 794/2004 (60). 3. france shall cancel all outstanding payments of aid under the scheme referred to in article 7 with effect from the date of notification of this decision. article 11 1. recovery of the aid granted shall be immediate and effective. 2. france shall ensure that this decision is implemented within four months of the date of its notification. article 12 1. within two months of notification of this decision, france shall submit the following information to the commission: the final list of beneficiaries of the aid granted under the scheme referred to in articles 4, 5 and 7; the total amount of aid received under the scheme referred to in articles 4, 5 and 7; the total amount of aid that each beneficiary can receive under the adjustment plan; the amounts of cspe that each beneficiary has received and that are not aid under articles 1 to 3; the total amount under the scheme referred to in article 7 to be recovered from each beneficiary; the final total amount (principal and interest) recovered from each beneficiary; a detailed description of the measures planned to comply with this decision. 2. the recovery procedure must have been implemented within four months of notification of this decision. within that period, france shall provide the commission with documents proving that the beneficiaries have been given notice to repay the aid and that they have actually repaid the aid to be recovered. 3. france shall keep the commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this decision until recovery of the aid granted under the scheme referred to in article 7 has been completed. whenever so requested by the commission, france shall immediately submit information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this decision. it shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and interest already recovered from the beneficiaries. article 13 this decision is addressed to the french republic. done at brussels, 31 july 2018. for the commission margrethe vestager member of the commission (1) oj c 348, 3.10.2014, p. 78. (2) oj c 200, 28.6.2014, p. 1. (3) ecli:eu:c:2013:851. (4) amount as at 1 january 2015. this amount was gradually revised. it was eur 569 418 in 2013. (5) reply from france of 5 may 2014. (6) memorandum from the french authorities of 23 november 2017 and annex. (7) community guidelines on state aid for railway undertakings (oj c 184, 22.7.2008, p. 13). (8) oj c 348, 3.10.2014, p. 78. (9) recitals 154 and 155 of the opening decision. (10) chapter 4: aid in the form of reductions of or exemptions from environmental taxes. (11) council directive 2003/96/ec of 27 october 2003 restructuring the community framework for the taxation of energy products and electricity (oj l 283, 31.10.2003, p. 51). (12) sa.38632 reform of the renewable energy law in germany. (13) judgment of the court of justice of 15 november 2011, commission v gibraltar and united kingdom, c-106/09, ecli:eu:c:2011:732. (14) constitutional council decision no 2005-516 dc of 7 july 2005. (15) information from the commission - community guidelines on state aid for environmental protection (oj c 37, 3.2.2001, p. 3). (16) memorandum of 22 october 2015. (17) directive 2004/8/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 11 february 2004 on the promotion of cogeneration based on a useful heat demand in the internal energy market and amending directive 92/42/eec (oj l 52, 21.2.2004, p. 50). (18) directive 2009/72/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 13 july 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in electricity and repealing directive 2003/54/ec (oj l 211, 14.8.2009, p. 55). (19) icf international, an international comparison of energy and climate change policies impacting energy intensive industries in selected countries, july 2012. (20) memorandum from the french authorities of 23 november 2017. (21) oj c 336, 6.10.2017, p. 2. (22) oj l 258, 6.10.2017, p. 127. (23) council regulation (eu) 2015/1589 of 13 july 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of article 108 of the treaty on the functioning of the european union (oj l 248, 24.9.2015, p. 9). (24) commission regulation (eu) no 1407/2013 of 18 december 2013 on the application of articles 107 and 108 of the treaty on the functioning of the european union to de minimis aid (oj l 352, 24.12.2013, p. 1). (25) oj c 91, 21.4.2009, p. 3. (26) see the judgments of 16 may 2002, france v commission, c-482/99, ecli:eu:c:2002:294, paragraph 36; 17 july 2008, essent netwerk noord and others, c-206/06, ecli:eu:c:2008:413, paragraph 70; 19 december 2013, association vent de col re! and others, c-262/12, ecli:eu:c:2013:851, paragraphs 19 to 21; and 13 september 2017, enea, c-329/15, ecli:eu:c:2017:671, paragraph 25. see also the doux levage judgment, cited below in footnote 25, paragraph 34, and the judgment of 19 march 2013, bouygues t l com v commission, c-399/10 p and c-401/10 p, ecli:eu:c:2013:175, paragraph 100. (27) judgment of 17 july 2008, essent netwerk noord and others, c-206/06, ecli:eu:c:2008:413. (28) judgment of 19 december 2013, association vent de col re! and others, c-262/12, ecli:eu:c:2013:851, paragraph 25. (29) judgment of 19 december 2013, association vent de col re! and others, c-262/12, ecli:eu:c:2013:851. (30) judgments of 15 march 1994, banco exterior de espa a v ayuntamiento de valencia, c-387/92, ecli:eu:c:1994:100, paragraph 13, and 17 june 1999, belgium v commission, c-75/97, ecli:eu:c:1999:311, paragraph 23. (31) judgments of 21 december 2016, commission v world duty free group, c-20/15 p and c-21/15 p, ecli:eu:c:2016:981, paragraph 60, and 21 december 2016, commission v hansestadt l beck (l beck airport), c-524/14 p, ecli:eu:c:2016:971, paragraphs 55 and 58. (32) judgments of 29 april 2004, netherlands v commission, c-159/01, ecli:eu:c:2004:246, paragraph 42, and 8 september 2011, nox emission trading scheme, c-279/08 p, ecli:eu:c:2011:551, paragraph 62. (33) judgments of the general court concluding that, under these circumstances, the measure is selective: 11 december 2014, austria v commission, t-251/11, ecli:eu:t:2014:1060, and 10 may 2016, germany v commission, t-47/15, ecli:eu:t:2016:281. (34) see the judgment of 17 september 1980, philip morris v commission, 730/79, ecli:eu:c:1980:209, paragraph 11. (35) judgment of 3 march 2005, wolfgang heiser v finanzamt innsbruck, c-172/03, ecli:eu:c:2005:130. (36) sa.46526, paragraph 94. (37) in its judgment of 8 september 2011 in paint graphos and others, c-78/08 to c-80/08, ecli:eu:c:2011:550, the court of justice referred to the possibility of relying on the nature or general scheme of the national tax system as justification for the fact that cooperative societies which distribute all their profits to their members are not taxed themselves as cooperatives, provided that tax is levied on the individual members (paragraph 71). (38) in the same respect, see sa.38632, paragraph 168, and sa.46526 (oj c 158, 4.5.2018). (39) judgments of 21 december 2016, commission v world duty free group, c-20/15 p and c-21/15 p, ecli:eu:c:2016:981, paragraph 60, and 21 december 2016, commission v hansestadt l beck (l beck airport), c-524/14 p, ecli:eu:c:2016:971, paragraphs 55 and 58. (40) information from the commission - community guidelines on state aid for environmental protection (oj c 37, 3.2.2001, p. 3). (41) oj c 336, 6.10.2017. (42) oj l 258, 6.10.2017. (43) directive 2012/27/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 25 october 2012 on energy efficiency, amending directives 2009/125/ec and 2010/30/eu and repealing directives 2004/8/ec and 2006/32/ec (oj l 315, 14.11.2012, p. 1). (44) memorandum from the french authorities of 20 december 2016, p. 16. (45) by decision of 16 september 2016, the commission approved the french scheme for cogeneration support, state aid measure sa.43719. (46) com(2017) 623 final, 24.10.2017. (47) sa.32060: alleged illegal aid for discharging public service obligations in the non-interconnected islands. (48) providing a fair deal for consumers. (49) see the conclusions of the european council of 17 june 2010, which confirm that the objective of energy efficiency is one of the targets in a new strategy for jobs and smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. (50) council regulation (ec) no 994/98 of 7 may 1998 on the application of articles 92 and 93 of the treaty establishing the european community to certain categories of horizontal state aid (oj l 142, 14.5.1998, p. 1). (51) oj c 83, 7.4.2009, p. 1. (52) oj c 91, 21.4.2009, p. 1. (53) commission implementing regulation (eu) 2016/1046 of 28 june 2016 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain molybdenum wires originating in the people's republic of china following an expiry review pursuant to article 11(2) of council regulation (ec) no 1225/2009 (oj l 170, 29.6.2016, p. 19). (54) judgments of 13 january 2005, streekgewest westelijk noord-brabant v staatssecretaris van financi n, c-174/02, ecli:eu:c:2005:10, paragraph 25; 13 january 2005, f. j. pape v minister van landbouw, c-175/02, ecli:eu:c:2005:11, paragraph 14; and 27 october 2005, distribution casino france and others v organic, c-266/04 to c-270/04, c-276/04 and c-321/04 to c-325/04, ecli:eu:c:2005:657, paragraph 34. (55) streekgewest westelijk noord-brabant, cited above, paragraph 26; distribution casino france, cited above, paragraph 40; air liquide industries belgium sa v ville de seraing, c-393/04, ecli:eu:c:2005:657; and province de li ge, c-41/05, ecli:eu:c:2006:403. (56) dts, c-449/14 p, ecli:eu:c:2016:848. (57) see judgment of 12 july 1973, commission v germany, c-70/72, ecli:eu:c:1973:87, paragraph 13. (58) see judgment of 14 september 1994, spain v commission, c-278/92, c-279/92 and c-280/92, ecli:eu:c:1994:325, paragraph 75. (59) see judgment of 17 june 1999, belgium v commission, c-75/97, ecli:eu:c:1999:311, paragraphs 64 and 65. (60) commission regulation (ec) no 794/2004 of 21 april 2004 implementing council regulation (eu) 2015/1589 laying down detailed rules for the application of article 108 of the treaty on the functioning of the european union (oj l 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1).

name: council implementing decision (cfsp) 2019/763 of 13 may 2019 implementing decision 2013/798/cfsp concerning restrictive measures against the central african republic type: decision_impl subject matter: international affairs; european construction; civil law; africa date published: 2019-05-14 14.5.2019 en official journal of the european union l 125/21 council implementing decision (cfsp) 2019/763 of 13 may 2019 implementing decision 2013/798/cfsp concerning restrictive measures against the central african republic the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on european union, and in particular article 31(2) thereof, having regard to council decision 2013/798/cfsp of 23 december 2013 concerning restrictive measures against the central african republic (1), and in particular article 2c thereof, having regard to the proposal of the high representative of the union for foreign affairs and security policy, whereas: (1) on 23 december 2013, the council adopted decision 2013/798/cfsp. (2) on 18 april 2019, the united nations security council committee established pursuant to united nations security council resolution 2127 (2013) updated the information relating to one person subject to restrictive measures. (3) the annex to decision 2013/798/cfsp should therefore be amended accordingly, has adopted this decision: article 1 the annex to decision 2013/798/cfsp is hereby amended as set out in the annex to this decision. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at brussels, 13 may 2019. for the council the president f. mogherini (1) oj l 352, 24.12.2013, p. 51. annex in decision 2013/798/cfsp, the annex, part a (persons), the entry for the person listed below is replaced by the following entry: 12. abdoulaye hissene (alias: a) abdoulaye iss ne; b) abdoulaye hissein; c) hissene abdoulaye; d) abdoulaye iss ne ramadane; e) abdoulaye issene ramadan; f) issene abdoulaye) date of birth: a) 1967; b) 1 jan. 1967 place of birth: a) ndele, bamingui-bangoran, central african republic; b) haraze mangueigne, chad nationality: a) central african republic; b) chad passport no: car diplomatic passport no d00000897, issued on 5 april 2013 (valid until 4 april 2018) national identification no: chad national identity card no. 103-00653129-22, issued on 21 april 2009 (expires on 21 april 2019) address: a) km5, bangui, central african republic; b) nana-grebizi, central african republic; c) ndjari, ndjamena, chad date of un designation:17 may 2017 other information: hiss ne was formerly the minister of youth and sports as part of the cabinet for the central african republic's former president michel djotodia. prior to that, he was the head of the convention of patriots for justice and peace, a political party. he also established himself as a leader of armed militias in bangui, in particular in the pk5 (3rd district) neighbourhood. father's name is abdoulaye. mother's name is absita moussa. photo available for inclusion in the interpol-un security council special notice. interpol-un security council special notice web link: https://www.interpol.int/en/notice/search/un/6098910 information from the narrative summary of reasons for listing provided by the sanctions committee: abdoulaye hiss ne was listed on 17 may 2017 pursuant to paragraphs 16 and 17(g) of resolution 2339 (2017) as engaging in or providing support for acts that undermine the peace, stability or security of the car, including acts that threaten or impede the political transition process, or the stabilisation and reconciliation process or that fuel violence; and involved in planning, directing, sponsoring, or conducting attacks against un missions or international security presences, including minusca, the european union missions and french operations which support them. additional information: abdoulaye hiss ne and other members of the ex-s l ka collaborated with anti-balaka spoilers allied with former central african republic (car) president fran ois boziz , including maxime mokom, to encourage violent protests and clashes in september 2015 as part of a failed coup attempt to bring down the government while then-transitional president catherine samba-panza was attending the 2015 un general assembly. mokom, hiss ne, and others were indicted by the car government for various criminal offenses, including murder, arson, torture, and looting, stemming from the failed coup. since 2015, hiss ne had become one of the main leaders of armed militias located in the pk5 neighbourhood of bangui which comprised more than 100 men. as such, he prevented the freedom of movement and the return of state authority in the area, including through illegal taxation of transportation and commercial activities. in the second half of 2015, hiss ne acted as the representative of the ex-s l ka nairobists in bangui operating in a rapprochement with anti-balaka fighters under mokom. armed men under the control of haroun gaye and hiss ne participated in the violent events which took place in bangui between 26 september and 3 october 2015. members of hiss ne's group are suspected of having been involved in an attack on the 13 december 2015 the day of the constitutional referendum on the vehicle of mohamed moussa dhaffane, a leader of the ex-s l ka. hiss ne is accused of orchestrating violence in bangui's km5 district that killed five, wounded twenty, and prevented residents from voting in the constitutional referendum. hiss ne put the elections at risk by creating a cycle of retaliatory attacks between different groups. on 15 march 2016, hiss ne was apprehended by the police at bangui m'poko airport and transferred to the research and investigation section of the national gendarmerie. his militia subsequently released him, using force, and stole one weapon previously handed over by minusca as part of an exemption request approved by the committee. on 19 june 2016, following the arrest of muslim traders by internal security forces at pk 12 , militias of gaye and hiss ne kidnapped five national policemen in bangui. on 20 june, minusca attempted to release the policemen. armed men under the control of hiss ne and gaye exchanged fire with the peacekeepers attempting to release the hostages. as a result, at least six individuals were killed and one peacekeeper was injured. on 12 august 2016, hiss ne took the lead of a 6-vehicle convoy with heavily armed individuals. the convoy, which was fleeing bangui, was intercepted by minusca south of sibut. en route to the north, the convoy exchanged fire with internal security forces at several checkpoints. the convoy was eventually stopped by minusca 40 km south of sibut. after multiple gunfights, minusca captured 11 of the men, but hiss ne and several others escaped. individuals arrested indicated to minusca that hiss ne was the leader of the convoy whose objective was to reach bria and participate in the assembly of ex-s l ka groups organised by nourredine adam. in august and september 2016, the panel of experts travelled twice to sibut in order to inspect the belongings of the convoy of hiss ne, gaye and hamit tidjani, seized by minusca on 13 august. the panel also inspected the ammunition seized in the house of hiss ne on 16 august. lethal and non-lethal military equipment was recovered in the six vehicles and from the apprehended individuals. on 16 august 2016, the central gendarmerie raided the home of hiss ne in bangui. more than 700 weapons were found. on 4 september 2016, a group of ex-s l ka elements coming from kaga-bandoro on six motor-bikes to pick up hiss ne and his affiliates opened fire against minusca next to d koa. during this incident, one ex-s l ka fighter was killed, and two peacekeepers and one civilian were wounded.

name: commission decision (eu) 2019/722 of 30 april 2019 on the proposed citizens' initiative entitled stopping trade with israeli settlements operating in the occupied palestinian territory (notified under document c(2019) 3305) type: decision subject matter: rights and freedoms; parliament; international security; asia and oceania; european construction date published: 2019-05-10 10.5.2019 en official journal of the european union l 122/57 commission decision (eu) 2019/722 of 30 april 2019 on the proposed citizens' initiative entitled stopping trade with israeli settlements operating in the occupied palestinian territory (notified under document c(2019) 3305) (only the english text is authentic) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to regulation (eu) no 211/2011 of the european parliament and of the council of 16 february 2011 on the citizens' initiative (1), and in particular article 4 thereof, whereas: (1) the subject matter of the proposed citizens' initiative entitled stopping trade with israeli settlements operating in the occupied palestinian territory refers to the following: to not recognize or assist israeli violations of international law and human rights, the eu has the obligation to stop trade with israeli settlements that are colonizing occupied palestinian territory. (2) the objectives of the proposed citizens' initiative refer to the following: the european commission has exclusive competence over trade. as such and in light of its obligations under international law to not recognize or assist israel's wrongful acts in occupied palestine, the commission needs to: 1. formally recognize that trade with israeli settlements is prohibited for both the eu as a whole and all member states. 2. enforce a regulation which ensures that goods and services originating fully or in part in such settlements will no longer enter the european market. (3) the treaty on european union (teu) reinforces citizenship of the union and enhances further the democratic functioning of the union by providing, inter alia, that every citizen is to have the right to participate in the democratic life of the union by way of a european citizens' initiative. (4) to this end, the procedures and conditions required for the citizens' initiative should be clear, simple, user-friendly and proportionate to the nature of the citizens' initiative so as to encourage participation by citizens and to make the union more accessible. (5) a legal act covering the subject matter of the proposed citizens' initiative could only be adopted on the basis of article 215 tfeu. (6) however, a prerequisite for a legal act to be adopted on the basis of article 215 tfeu is a decision adopted in accordance with chapter 2 of title v of the treaty on european union which provides for the interruption or reduction, in part or completely, of economic and financial relations with the third country concerned. the commission does not have the power to submit proposals for such a decision. in the absence of a corresponding decision adopted in accordance with chapter 2 of title v of the treaty on european union, the commission does not have the power to submit a proposal for a legal act to be adopted on the basis of article 215 tfeu. (7) for these reasons, the proposed citizens' initiative entitled stopping trade with israeli settlements operating in the occupied palestinian territory manifestly falls outside the framework of the commission's powers to submit a proposal for a legal act of the union for the purpose of implementing the treaties within the meaning of article 4(2)(b) of the regulation, read in conjunction with article 2, point 1, thereof, has adopted this decision: article 1 registration of the proposed citizens' initiative entitled stopping trade with israeli settlements operating in the occupied palestinian territory is hereby refused. article 2 this decision is addressed to the organisers (members of the citizens' committee) of the proposed citizens' initiative called stopping trade with israeli settlements operating in the occupied palestinian territory, represented by [personal data deleted following the consultation of the organisers] acting as contact persons. done at brussels, 30 april 2019. for the commission frans timmermans vice-president (1) oj l 65, 11.3.2011, p. 1.

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/709 of 6 may 2019 on the appointment of the network manager for air traffic management (atm) network functions of the single european sky (notified under document c(2019) 3228) type: decision_impl subject matter: transport policy; eu institutions and european civil service; european organisations; european construction; organisation of transport; air and space transport; international law date published: 2019-05-08 8.5.2019 en official journal of the european union l 120/27 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/709 of 6 may 2019 on the appointment of the network manager for air traffic management (atm) network functions of the single european sky (notified under document c(2019) 3228) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to regulation (ec) no 551/2004 of the european parliament and of the council of 10 march 2004 on the organisation and use of the airspace in the single european sky (the airspace regulation) (1), and in particular point (b) of article 6(2) thereof, after consulting the single sky committee, whereas: (1) in accordance with article 6(6) of regulation (ec) no 551/2004, member states entrusted eurocontrol with the performance of air traffic flow management, through the implementation of the central flow management unit (cfmu). (2) by its decision c(2011) 4130 final of 7 july 2011, the commission appointed eurocontrol as network manager to perform the tasks necessary for the execution of the atm network functions of the single european sky between july 2011 and december 2019. (3) the commission regularly reviewed the effectiveness of the manner in which eurocontrol performed those tasks in the period between 2011 and 2016. the commission concluded that eurocontrol had done so in a manner, which is satisfactory from an operational perspective. (4) in 2017, the commission reviewed the governance, financial arrangements, and cost-base and cost-efficiency aspects of the atm network functions and concluded that the network manager should benefit from greater management autonomy. the director-general of eurocontrol granted the director network manager, which performs the tasks of the network manager at eurocontrol, such autonomy by decision no xi/91 (2017) of 1 november 2017 (2). (5) the commission also concluded that the atm network functions should be performed in an enhanced and more cost-efficient manner than in the 2011-2016 period, in particular by avoiding any duplication of effort, thus requiring fewer, or at least not more, financial and human resources for performing those functions in the member states. (6) considering the overall positive assessment of the performance in a cost-efficient manner of the tasks of the network manager by eurocontrol in the first and second reference period of the performance scheme as set out in article 8 of commission implementing regulation (eu) no 390/2013 (3), as well as the need to ensure business continuity in the performance of the atm network functions, the commission invited, on 17 july 2018, eurocontrol to put forward a proposal. the commission requested eurocontrol to specify its willingness and ability to be again appointed as network manager, in accordance with the criteria provided for in article 6(2) of regulation (ec) no 551/2004. in that respect, it also requested eurocontrol to describe how it would meet the conditions set in article 4(3) of commission implementing regulation (eu) 2019/123 (4), and to outline how, once appointed, it would meet the requirements as defined in article 4(4) of that regulation. (7) in its proposal submitted on 17 december 2018, eurocontrol submitted information regarding the requirements set out in article 4(3) and 4(4) of implementing regulation (eu) 2019/123. (8) following a subsequent request made by the commission, eurocontrol provided additional clarifications. (9) the commission has assessed the elements presented by eurocontrol and found that the requirements set out in article 4(3) of implementing regulation (eu) 2019/123 are met. (10) in its proposal, referring notably to the results it had achieved in its capacity as network manager during the first and second reference periods, eurocontrol addresses the issues referred to in point (a) of article 4(3) of implementing regulation (eu) 2019/123. the proposal demonstrates its competence and ability to perform the tasks set out in article 7 of that regulation. (11) in accordance with article 4(3)(b) of implementing regulation (eu) 2019/123, eurocontrol described in its proposal in a qualitative and quantitative manner the main objectives it plans to achieve with regard to the management of network functions and how it will ensure a good quality of the services it provides to operational stakeholders. (12) in accordance with article 4(3)(c) of implementing regulation (eu) 2019/123, referring, inter alia, to the lessons learnt of the first and second reference period, eurocontrol described the approach and means it plans to use to act as network manager. (13) where the network manager also performs activities other than those relevant to the execution of the network functions, article 4(3)(d) of implementing regulation (eu) 2019/123 requires it to demonstrate that those other activities will be carried out independently from the network manager's tasks set out in article 7. in its proposal, eurocontrol indicated that the tasks of the network manager relevant to the execution of the network functions would be performed by its network manager directorate and that the activities of that part of its organisation would be adequately separated from other activities. (14) in addition to fulfilling the requirements of article 4(3), eurocontrol proposed to continue improving the cost-efficiency in performing the tasks of the network manager over the period of its appointment. (15) eurocontrol should therefore be appointed as network manager. (16) that appointment should cover both the third and the fourth reference periods, specified in article 7 of commission implementing regulation (eu) 2019/317 (5), given the investments needed for the deployment of a state-of-art system to support the performance of the atm network functions and the need to ensure stability and continuity of network operations. (17) in accordance with article 4(4)(a) of implementing regulation (eu) 2019/123 the network manager should be certified by the european union aviation safety agency before the start of the third reference period. (18) in order to ensure the autonomy of the network manager it is important that there is an adequate separation of activities within the organisation appointed as network manager. in accordance with point (d) of article 4(3) of implementing regulation (eu) 2019/123, eurocontrol should therefore carry out its activities as network manager independently from any other activity, including in respect of activities related to the work of international organisations. (19) in order to ensure fairness in respect of member states and third countries to whom the network manager provides its services, the network manager should have appropriate funding and spending arrangements and respect dedicated rules on account management, has adopted this decision: article 1 appointment of the network manager 1. eurocontrol is appointed as the network manager. 2. the appointment referred to in paragraph 1 shall cover the third and fourth reference period specified in article 7 of implementing regulation (eu) 2019/317. article 2 tasks of the network manager 1. eurocontrol acting as network manager shall perform the tasks necessary for the execution of the atm network functions referred to in article 7 of implementing regulation (eu) 2019/123. 2. eurocontrol acting as network manager shall perform its tasks in accordance with the requirements laid down in article 4 of implementing regulation (eu) 2019/123. article 3 certification before carrying out the tasks entrusted to it, by 2 january 2020 eurocontrol as network manager shall be certified by the agency in accordance with commission implementing regulation (eu) 2017/373 (6). article 4 network manager and network management board 1. the manager of the network manager referred to in article 18(4)(c) of implementing regulation (eu) 2019/123 shall be the director of eurocontrol's network manager directorate. 2. the representative of eurocontrol referred to in article 18(4)(f) of implementing regulation (eu) 2019/123 shall be the director-general of eurocontrol. 3. the network manager shall bear the costs related to the administrative support of the chair of the network management board. article 5 participation in the consultation of member states at the commission's request, the network manager shall participate in the consultation of the member states' referred to in article 21 of implementing regulation (eu) 2019/123. article 6 independent exercise of tasks in accordance with article 4(3)(d) of implementing regulation (eu) 2019/123, eurocontrol shall carry out its tasks as network manager independently from any other activity, including in respect of activities related to the work of international organisations. article 7 network manager funding and spending arrangements and separation of accounts 1. without prejudice to the agreements referred to in article 24(1) of implementing regulation (eu) 2019/123, the network manager shall have arrangements in place, which ensure that member states and third countries as referred to in article 24(1) and (2) of that regulation, make a fair and proportionate financial contribution for the tasks entrusted to the network manager. regarding the management of its accounts, it shall respect paragraphs 3 and 4. 2. the network manager shall ensure that payments made by union member states in accordance with article 25(1) of implementing regulation (eu) 2019/123 are not used to fund expenses for activities other than covered by the tasks referred to in article 7 of that regulation or incurred due to the participation of third countries under article 24(3) and (4) of that regulation. 3. in accordance with article 25(3)(c) of implementing regulation (eu) 2019/123, the tasks of eurocontrol as network manager shall be covered by a separate account within eurocontrol's budget. 4. within the account referred to in paragraph 3, the network manager shall display separately costs incurred and payments made due to any cooperative arrangements as referred to in article 24(3) and (4) of implementing regulation (eu) 2019/123. article 8 entry into force this decision shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at brussels, 6 may 2019. for the commission violeta bulc member of the commission (1) oj l 96, 31.3.2004, p. 20. (2) decision concerning the delegation to the director network manager of powers and/or authority to sign on matters concerning support services from other agency units, the network management budget process, network management operational staff social dialogue technical meetings, and operational and technical agreements necessary for eurocontrol's performance of the network functions. (3) commission implementing regulation (eu) no 390/2013 of 3 may 2013 laying down a performance scheme for air navigation services and network functions (oj l 128, 9.5.2013, p. 1). (4) commission implementing regulation (eu) 2019/123 of 24 january 2019 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of air traffic management (atm) network functions and repealing commission regulation (eu) no 677/2011 (oj l 28, 31.1.2019, p. 1). (5) commission implementing regulation (eu) 2019/317 of 11 february 2019 laying down a performance and charging scheme in the single european sky and repealing implementing regulations (eu) no 390/2013 and (eu) no 391/2013 (oj l 56, 25.2.2019, p. 1). (6) commission implementing regulation (eu) 2017/373 of 1 march 2017 laying down common requirements for providers of air traffic management/air navigation services and other air traffic management network functions and their oversight, repealing regulation (ec) no 482/2008, implementing regulations (eu) no 1034/2011, (eu) no 1035/2011 and (eu) 2016/1377 and amending regulation (eu) no 677/2011 (oj l 62, 8.3.2017, p. 1).

name: council decision (eu) 2019/703 of 8 october 2014 on the signing, on behalf of the union and its member states, of a protocol amending the agreement on air transport between canada and the european community and its member states, to take account of the accession to the european union of the republic of croatia type: decision subject matter: international affairs; europe; european construction; america; air and space transport date published: 2019-05-08 8.5.2019 en official journal of the european union l 120/3 council decision (eu) 2019/703 of 8 october 2014 on the signing, on behalf of the union and its member states, of a protocol amending the agreement on air transport between canada and the european community and its member states, to take account of the accession to the european union of the republic of croatia the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 100(2), in conjunction with article 218(5) thereof, having regard to the act of accession of croatia, and in particular the second subparagraph of article 6(2) thereof, having regard to the proposal from the european commission, whereas: (1) on 14 september 2012, the council authorised the commission to open negotiations, on behalf of the union, its member states and the republic of croatia, to conclude a protocol amending the agreement on air transport between canada and the european community and its member states (1), to take account of the accession to the european union of the republic of croatia (the protocol). (2) those negotiations were successfully completed on 16 october 2013. (3) the protocol should be signed on behalf of the union and its member states, subject to its conclusion at a later date, has adopted this decision: article 1 the signing of the protocol amending the agreement on air transport between canada and the european community and its member states, to take account of the accession to the european union of the republic of croatia (2) is hereby authorised on behalf of the union and its member states, subject to the conclusion of the protocol. article 2 the president of the council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the protocol on behalf of the union and its member states. article 3 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at luxembourg, 8 october 2014. for the council the president m. lupi (1) the text of the agreement is published in oj l 207, 6.8.2010, p. 32. (2) the text of the protocol will be published together with the decision on its conclusion.

name: commission delegated decision (eu) 2019/708 of 15 february 2019 supplementing directive 2003/87/ec of the european parliament and of the council concerning the determination of sectors and subsectors deemed at risk of carbon leakage for the period 2021 to 2030 (text with eea relevance.) type: decision_del subject matter: chemistry; environmental policy; deterioration of the environment; economic structure; marketing date published: 2019-05-08 8.5.2019 en official journal of the european union l 120/20 commission delegated decision (eu) 2019/708 of 15 february 2019 supplementing directive 2003/87/ec of the european parliament and of the council concerning the determination of sectors and subsectors deemed at risk of carbon leakage for the period 2021 to 2030 (text with eea relevance) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to directive 2003/87/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 13 october 2003 establishing a system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the union and amending council directive 96/61/ec (1), and in particular article 10b(5) thereof, whereas: (1) directive 2003/87/ec provides that auctioning of greenhouse gas emission allowances is the basic principle within the scope of the system for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the union (eu ets). (2) the european council of october 2014 considered that free allocation should not expire and that existing measures should continue after 2020 to prevent the risk of carbon leakage due to climate policy, as long as no comparable efforts are undertaken in other major economies. to preserve the environmental benefit of emission reductions in the union while measures by third countries do not provide industry with comparable incentives to reduce emissions, transitional free allocation should continue to installations in sectors and subsectors at risk of carbon leakage. (3) experience gathered during the operation of the eu ets has confirmed that sectors and subsectors are at risk of carbon leakage to varying degrees, and that free allocation has prevented carbon leakage. while some sectors and subsectors can be deemed to be at a higher risk of carbon leakage, others are able to pass on a considerable share of the costs of allowances to cover their emissions in product prices without losing market share, and only bear the remaining part of the costs so that they are at a low risk of carbon leakage. to address the risk of carbon leakage, paragraph 5 of article 10b of directive 2003/87/ec provides that the commission is to determine a list of sectors and subsectors deemed to be at risk of carbon leakage list. those sectors and subsectors are to receive free allowances at 100 % of the quantity determined pursuant to article 10a of directive 2003/87/ec. (4) by its decision 2014/746/eu (2), the commission determined a carbon leakage list for the period 2015 to 2019. by directive (eu) 2018/410 of the european parliament and of the council (3), the validity of the carbon leakage list was extended until 31 december 2020. (5) article 10b of directive 2003/87/ec sets out the criteria for the assessment based on data from the three most recent calendar years available. in this regard, the commission used data from the years 2013, 2014 and 2015 since, at the time of the assessment, data from 2016 were only available for some of the parameters. (6) in order to establish the carbon leakage list for 2021-2030, the commission assessed the risk of carbon leakage of sectors and subsectors at nace-4 level of the statistical classification of economic activities in the union in accordance with regulation (ec) no 1893/2006 of the european parliament and of the council (4). nace-4 is the level with optimal data availability defining sectors precisely. a sector is denoted at a 4-digit level of the nace classification, and a subsector is denoted at prodcom-6 or 8-digit level, that is, the classification of goods used for statistics on industrial production in the union, following directly from the nace classification. (7) the carbon leakage assessment was carried out in two steps. for the quantitative first-level assessment at nace-4 level, a sector is deemed to be at risk of carbon leakage if the carbon leakage indicator exceeds the 0,2 threshold set out in article 10b(1) of directive 2003/87/ec. for a limited number of cases meeting clearly established eligibility criteria specified in paragraphs 2 and 3 of article 10b of directive 2003/87/ec, a second-level assessment was carried out, either as a qualitative assessment with specified criteria or as a quantitative assessment at a disaggregated level. (8) in accordance with article 10b of directive 2003/87/ec, the carbon leakage indicator was calculated by multiplying the sector's intensity of trade with third countries by the sector's emission intensity. (9) in accordance with article 10b of directive 2003/87/ec, intensity of trade with third countries was calculated as the ratio between total value of exports to third countries plus the value of imports from third countries and the total market size for the european economic area (annual turnover plus total imports from third countries). the commission assessed the trade intensity for each sector and subsector on the basis of data reported by eurostat in the comext database. the commission considers this to be the most complete and reliable data on the total values of exports to third countries and imports from third countries as well as on the total annual turnover in the union. (10) emission intensity was calculated as the sum of direct and indirect emissions for the sector concerned, divided by the gross value added and is measured in kg co2 divided by euros. the commission considers the european union transaction log to be the most accurate and transparent source of co2 emissions data at installation level and have therefore been used to calculate the direct emissions for sectors. installations have been attributed to sectors at nace-4 level based on installation-level information provided by member states in the national implementation measures submitted pursuant to article 11 of directive 2003/87/ec and commission decision 2011/278/eu (5). regarding the estimation of gross value added at sectoral level, data from the eurostat structural business statistics have been used as it is considered to be the most accurate source. (11) in order to determine indirect emissions, data on electricity consumption collected directly from member states is considered to be the most reliable source due to unavailability of data at eu-28 level. the electricity emission factor is used to convert electricity consumption into indirect emissions. the commission used the average eu electricity generation mix as the reference value. this is based on the union overall annual amount of emissions from the power sector accounting for all generation sources for electricity in europe divided by the corresponding amount of electricity generation. the electricity emission factor has been updated to take into account decarbonisation of the electricity system and the increasing share of renewables. the new value should be referenced to 2015 which is aligned with the data for the three most recent calendar years available (2013-2015). the updated value is 376 grams of carbon dioxide per kwh. (12) articles 10b(2) and (3) of directive 2003/87/ec provide detailed rules for eligibility of specific sectors and subsectors for a second assessment, in case they fail to meet the main carbon leakage criterion for inclusion on the carbon leakage list. in cases where the carbon leakage indicator was between 0,15 and 0,2, a qualitative assessment may have been requested by a sector to be carried out according to the criteria outlined in article 10b(2) of that directive. in accordance with article 10b(3) sectors and subsectors with an emission intensity exceeding 1,5 were eligible to apply for either a qualitative assessment or a quantitative assessment at disaggregated level (prodcom-6 or 8-digit level). sectors and subsectors for which free allocation is calculated on the basis of the refineries benchmarks were also eligible to apply for both types of assessments. those sectors and subsectors which are listed in point 1.2 of the annex to decision 2014/746/eu were eligible to submit applications for a quantitative assessment at a disaggregated level. (13) an online consultation was conducted from november 2017 to february 2018, during which stakeholders were invited to provide views on the methodological choices for determining the carbon leakage list. respondents were generally in favour of second-level assessments that would be as robust, fair and transparent as the first-level quantitative assessments, and expressed support for a uniform assessment framework that involves stakeholders. four meetings took place to prepare the carbon leakage list and further work regarding the assessments to be carried out with member states and with stakeholders between february and may 2018. (14) an impact assessment was conducted (6) to ensure that first-level assessments and second-level assessments for the carbon leakage list 2021-2030 are carried out in a comparable manner, i.e. that both assessments ensure that only sectors at risk of carbon leakage are identified. the impact assessment focused on the operational options related to the second-level assessment framework. (15) a preliminary carbon leakage list for 2021-2030 (7) was published on 8 may 2018, together with commission framework guidance documents for qualitative and disaggregated quantitative assessments (8). (16) assessments based on the criteria set out in articles 10b(2) and (3) of directive 2003/87/ec have been carried out on a number of sectors that were not deemed to be at risk of carbon leakage based on the quantitative criteria set out in article 10b(1). (17) the commission assessed a total of 245 industrial sectors classified under the mining and quarrying and manufacturing divisions of the nace classification. the sectors and subsectors listed in point 1 of the annex to this decision meet the criteria set out in article 10b(1) of directive 2003/87/ec and should be deemed to be at risk of carbon leakage. (18) qualitative assessments, based on the criteria set out in article 10b(2) and 10b(3) of directive 2003/87/ec have been carried out on a number of sectors. in the case of the sectors: extraction of salt (nace code 0893), finishing of textiles (nace code 1330), manufacture of basic pharmaceutical products (nace code 2110), manufacture of ceramic household and ornamental articles (nace code 2341), manufacture of ceramic sanitary fixtures (nace code 2342) and manufacture of bricks, tiles and construction products, in baked clay (nace code 2332) it was concluded that the addition of those sectors to the carbon leakage list is justified. those sectors should therefore be deemed to be at risk of carbon leakage for the period 2021-2030. (19) in the case of the sector mining of lignite (nace code 0520), the qualitative assessment that was carried out identified a number of shortcomings, including the fact that the sector cannot be considered to be impacted by direct emission costs and doubts concerning the link made between intra-union competition from other fuel sources and carbon leakage. some regional competition from extra-union lignite power plants was demonstrated, although the union wide assessment confirms the extremely limited exposure to external competition. it was therefore concluded that the addition of this sector to the list of sectors and subsectors deemed to be exposed to a risk of carbon leakage is not justified. (20) three applications were received from sectors not included in the preliminary carbon leakage list: extraction of natural gas (nace code 0620), manufacture of plaster products for construction purposes (nace code 2362) and casting of light metals (nace code 2453). the assessment of these applications focused on their eligibility to be on the carbon leakage list based on a quantitative first-level assessment at nace-4 level. the official data used to carry out the first-level assessments were communicated to stakeholders, and were considered as sufficiently robust for the publication of the preliminary carbon leakage list. the commission has examined the additional information provided by the three sectors in their applications and does not consider that this justifies changing the initial position. those sectors continue not to be deemed to be at risk of carbon leakage, as the relevant carbon leakage indicators do not exceed the 0,2 threshold set out in article 10b(1) of directive 2003/87/ec. furthermore, these sectors continue not to meet the eligibility criteria for further assessments as set out in article 10b(2) and 10b(3) of directive 2003/87/ec. (21) quantitative disaggregated assessments based on the criteria set out in article 10b(1) and (3) of directive 2003/87/ec have been carried on a number of subsectors. in the case of the sub sectors: kaolin and other kaolinic clays (prodcom code 08.12.21), frozen potatoes, prepared or preserved (including potatoes cooked or partly cooked in oil and then frozen; excluding by vinegar or acetic acid) (prodcom code 10.31.11.30), dried potatoes in the form of flour, meal, flakes, granules and pellets (prodcom code 10.31.13.00), concentrated tomato puree and paste (prodcom code 10.39.17.25), skimmed milk powder (prodcom code 10.51.21), whole milk powder (prodcom code 10.51.22), casein (prodcom code 10.51.53), lactose and lactose syrup (prodcom code 10.51.54), whey and modified whey in powder, granules or other solid forms, whether or not concentrated or containing added sweetening matter (prodcom code 10.51.55.30), bakers' yeast (prodcom code 10.89.13.34), vitrifiable enamels and glazes, engobes (slips) and similar preparations for ceramics, enamelling or glass (prodcom code 20.30.21.50), liquid lustres and similar preparations; glass frit and other glass in powder; granules or flakes (prodcom code 20.30.21.70) and open die forged ferrous parts for transmission shafts, camshafts, crankshafts and cranks etc. (prodcom code 25.50.11.34) it was concluded that the addition of those subsectors to the carbon leakage list is justified. those subsectors should therefore be deemed to be exposed to a risk of carbon leakage for the period 2021-2030. (22) in the case of the subsectors cocoa paste, whether or not defatted (prodcom code 10.82.11), cocoa butter, fat and oil (prodcom code 10.82.12) and cocoa powder, not containing added sugar or other sweetening matter (prodcom code 10.82.13), the quantitative disaggregated assessments that were carried out identified a number of deviations from the harmonised methodology leading to risks of significantly overestimating the carbon leakage indicator. it was therefore concluded that the addition of those subsectors to the carbon leakage list is not justified. (23) as the carbon leakage list is to be valid for the period 2021-2030, this decision should apply from 1 january 2021, has adopted this decision: article 1 the sectors and subsectors listed in the annex shall be deemed to be at risk of carbon leakage for the period 2021 to 2030. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the official journal of the european union. it shall apply from 1 january 2021. done at brussels, 15 february 2019. for the commission the president jean-claude juncker (1) oj l 275, 25.10.2003, p. 32. (2) commission decision 2014/746/eu of 27 october 2014 determining, pursuant to directive 2003/87/ec of the european parliament and of the council, a list of sectors and subsectors which are deemed to be exposed to a significant risk of carbon leakage, for the period 2015 to 2019 (oj l 308, 29.10.2014, p. 114) (3) directive (eu) 2018/410 of the european parliament and of the council of 14 march 2018 amending directive 2003/87/ec to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments, and decision (eu) 2015/1814, oj l 76, 19.3.2018, p. 3. (4) regulation (ec) no 1893/2006 of the european parliament and of the council of 20 december 2006 establishing the statistical classification of economic activities nace revision 2 and amending council regulation (eec) no 3037/90 as well as certain ec regulations on specific statistical domains (oj l 393, 30.12.2006, p. 1). (5) commission decision 2011/278/eu of 27 april 2011 determining transitional union-wide rules for harmonised free allocation of emission allowances pursuant to article 10a of directive 2003/87/ec of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 130, 17.5.2011, p. 1). (6) commission staff working document swd (2019) 22. (7) commission notice on preliminary carbon leakage, 2021-2030 (oj c 162, 8.5.2018, p. 1). (8) https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/ets/allowances/leakage/docs/framework_for_qualitative_assessments.pdf https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/ets/allowances/leakage/docs/framework_for_disaggregated_assessments.pdf annex sectors and subsectors which, pursuant to article 10b of directive 2003/87/ec, are deemed to be at risk of carbon leakage 1. based on the criteria set out in article 10b(1) of directive 2003/87/ec nace code description 0510 mining of hard coal 0610 extraction of crude petroleum 0710 mining of iron ores 0729 mining of other non-ferrous metal ores 0891 mining of chemical and fertiliser minerals 0899 other mining and quarrying n.e.c. 1041 manufacture of oils and fats 1062 manufacture of starches and starch products 1081 manufacture of sugar 1106 manufacture of malt 1310 preparation and spinning of textile fibres 1395 manufacture of non-wovens and articles made from non-wovens, except apparel 1411 manufacture of leather clothes 1621 manufacture of veneer sheets and wood-based panels 1711 manufacture of pulp 1712 manufacture of paper and paperboard 1910 manufacture of coke oven products 1920 manufacture of refined petroleum products 2011 manufacture of industrial gases 2012 manufacture of dyes and pigments 2013 manufacture of other inorganic basic chemicals 2014 manufacture of other organic basic chemicals 2015 manufacture of fertilisers and nitrogen compounds 2016 manufacture of plastics in primary forms 2017 manufacture of synthetic rubber in primary forms 2060 manufacture of man-made fibres 2311 manufacture of flat glass 2313 manufacture of hollow glass 2314 manufacture of glass fibres 2319 manufacture and processing of other glass, including technical glassware 2320 manufacture of refractory products 2331 manufacture of ceramic tiles and flags 2351 manufacture of cement 2352 manufacture of lime and plaster 2399 manufacture of other non-metallic mineral products n.e.c. 2410 manufacture of basic iron and steel and of ferro-alloys 2420 manufacture of tubes, pipes, hollow profiles and related fittings, of steel 2431 cold drawing of bars 2442 aluminium production 2443 lead, zinc and tin production 2444 copper production 2445 other non-ferrous metal production 2446 processing of nuclear fuel 2451 casting of iron 2. based on the criteria set out in article 10b(2) of directive 2003/87/ec nace code description 0893 extraction of salt 1330 finishing of textiles 2110 manufacture of basic pharmaceutical products 2341 manufacture of ceramic household and ornamental articles 2342 manufacture of ceramic sanitary fixtures 3. based on the criteria set out in article 10b(3), first subparagraph of directive 2003/87/ec nace code description 2332 manufacture of bricks, tiles and construction products, in baked clay 4. based on the criteria set out in article 10b(3), fifth subparagraph of directive 2003/87/ec prodcom code description 081221 kaolin and other kaolinic clays 10311130 frozen potatoes, prepared or preserved (including potatoes cooked or partly cooked in oil and then frozen; excluding by vinegar or acetic acid) 10311300 dried potatoes in the form of flour, meal, flakes, granules and pellets 10391725 concentrated tomato puree and paste 105121 skimmed milk powder 105122 whole milk powder 105153 casein 105154 lactose and lactose syrup 10515530 whey and modified whey in powder, granules or other solid forms, whether or not concentrated or containing added sweetening matter 10891334 bakers' yeast 20302150 vitrifiable enamels and glazes, engobes (slips) and similar preparations for ceramics, enamelling or glass 20302170 liquid lustres and similar preparations; glass frit and other glass in powder; granules or flakes 25501134 open die forged ferrous parts for transmission shafts, camshafts, crankshafts and cranks etc.

name: commission decision (eu) 2019/691 of 2 may 2019 authorising, in accordance with article 4(5) of commission implementing regulation (eu) 2018/574, economic operators to use the services of another id issuer (text with eea relevance.) type: decision subject matter: technology and technical regulations; marketing; plant product; agri-foodstuffs; research and intellectual property; european union law; consumption date published: 2019-05-03 3.5.2019 en official journal of the european union l 116/80 commission decision (eu) 2019/691 of 2 may 2019 authorising, in accordance with article 4(5) of commission implementing regulation (eu) 2018/574, economic operators to use the services of another id issuer (text with eea relevance) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to directive 2014/40/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 3 april 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing directive 2001/37/ec (1), and in particular article 15 thereof, whereas: (1) directive 2014/40/eu and commission implementing regulation (eu) 2018/574 (2) set out the legal framework for the establishment of a union-wide traceability system for tobacco products. at union level, those acts also implement article 8 of the protocol to eliminate illicit trade in tobacco products to the world health organisation's framework convention on tobacco control (3), which has been ratified by the european union (4) and provides for an establishment of a global tracking and tracing regime for tobacco products. (2) in order to enable all tobacco products to be tracked and traced throughout the union, article 15(1) of directive 2014/40/eu requires member states to ensure that all unit packets of those products are marked with a unique identifier. pursuant to article 15(13) that requirement will apply to cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco from 20 may 2019. (3) article 3(1) of implementing regulation (eu) 2018/574 obliges each member state to appoint an entity (the id issuer) responsible for generating and issuing the unique identifiers. article 3(6) requires member states to notify the commission of the appointment of the id issuer and of its identification code within one month of its appointment. (4) article 4 of implementing regulation (eu) 2018/574 lays down rules on the competent id issuers for generating and issuing unique identifiers depending on where the products are manufactured, imported or aggregated. furthermore, pursuant to the second subparagraph of article 4(1), a member state may require that its appointed id issuer is competent for generating and issuing unique identifiers for all tobacco products placed on its market. (5) article 4(5) of implementing regulation (eu) 2018/574 provides that, in the event of the temporary absence of the competent id issuer, the commission may authorise economic operators to use the services of another id issuer already appointed in accordance with article 3 of that regulation. (6) articles 9(2) and 13(2) of implementing regulation (eu) 2018/574 require economic operators, introducing requests for unit and aggregated level unique identifiers, to supply the information listed in points 2.1 and 2.2 of section 2 of chapter ii of annex ii to that regulation. that information is necessary for the generation of the unique identifiers and includes identifier codes, which allow for the registration of economic operators, facilities, and machines in the traceability system. therefore, identifier codes are essential in enabling economic operators to request unique identifiers from the competent id issuer. furthermore, the unique identifiers and the identifier codes are jointly necessary for recording and transmission of information on product movements and transactional events. the rules on requesting identifier codes for economic operators, facilities, and machines are set out in articles 14, 16 and 18 of implementing regulation (eu) 2018/574. the competence of the id issuers for issuing identifier codes is based on the operational location of economic operators. (7) at the time of the adoption of this decision, several member states have not notified to the commission the appointment of their respective id issuers in accordance with article 3(6) of implementing regulation (eu) 2018/574. in the absence of a competent id issuer, economic operators will not be able to request the identifier codes and the unique identifiers. consequently, those economic operators will be prevented from placing their products on the market. this could affect the smooth functioning of the internal market, in particular the intra-community trade of tobacco products, and this might compromise the very purpose of the traceability system and the elimination of illicit trade in tobacco products. (8) in order to limit to a certain extent the potential distortion of the smooth functioning of the internal market and to help in ensuring that the traceability system starts functioning on time, the commission should for a limited period of time authorise, in accordance with article 4(5) of implementing regulation (eu) 2018/574, the economic operators to use the services of an already appointed id issuer. (9) it is for the id issuers already appointed in accordance with article 3(1) of implementing regulation (eu) 2018/574 to decide whether to accept requests from economic operators for generating and issuing unique identifiers. in the temporary absence of the competent id issuer, other appointed id issuers may also provide economic operators with the identifier codes necessary for generating and issuing the unique identifiers and in order to fulfil the obligations set out in article 15(5) of directive 2014/40/eu and chapter vi of implementing regulation (eu) 2018/574. the provision of additional services should in no circumstances put at risk the other operations of the id issuer. (10) the identifier codes generated by id issuers in the temporary absence of the competent id issuer should be transferred to the competent id issuer once it is appointed along with other relevant information referred to in articles 14(2), 16(2) and 18(2) of implementing regulation (eu) 2018/574. the transfer should be done electronically without undue delay on the basis of a request from the competent id issuer addressed to the id issuers who decided to generate the identifier codes in the temporary absence of the competent id issuer. (11) the authorisation to use the services of another id issuer under article 4(5) of implementing regulation (eu) 2018/574 should only apply in the temporary absence of the competent id issuer. (12) this decision should not affect the competence rules set out in the implementing regulation (eu) 2018/574 with respect to issuing and registration of economic operator and facility codes for operators of first retail outlets. (13) taking into account that the traceability system as set out in article 15 of directive 2014/40/eu applies to cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco from 20 may 2019, this decision should enter into force on the day of its publication in the official journal of the european union. (14) given the temporary nature of the authorisation under article 4(5) of implementing regulation (eu) 2018/574, the commission considers it necessary to limit this decision in time, has adopted this decision: article 1 the commission authorises, in accordance with article 4(5) of implementing regulation (eu) 2018/574, economic operators as defined in point 2 of article 2 of that regulation to use the services of another id issuer that has been appointed in accordance with article 3 of implementing regulation (eu) 2018/574. the authorisation referred to in the first subparagraph shall be valid only during the temporary absence of the competent id issuer and in any event no later than until 31 december 2019. this decision shall not affect competence rules set out in the implementing regulation (eu) 2018/574 with respect to issuing and registration of economic operator and facility codes for operators of first retail outlets. article 2 economic operator, facility and machine identifier codes generated by the id issuers in the temporary absence of the competent id issuer shall be transferred to the competent id issuer once it is appointed, upon its request and without undue delay. those identifier codes shall be transferred along with other relevant information referred to in articles 14(2), 16(2) and 18(2) of implementing regulation (eu) 2018/574. the transfer shall be done electronically. economic operators shall be informed of the transfer by the competent id issuer. article 3 this decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the official journal of the european union. it shall apply until 31 december 2019 included. done at brussels, 2 may 2019. for the commission the president jean-claude juncker (1) oj l 127, 29.4.2014, p. 1. (2) commission implementing regulation (eu) 2018/574 of 15 december 2017 on technical standards for the establishment and operation of a traceability system for tobacco products (oj l 96, 16.4.2018, p. 7). (3) protocol to eliminate illicit trade in tobacco products to the world health organisation's framework convention on tobacco control (oj l 268, 1.10.2016, p. 10). (4) council decision (eu) 2016/1749 of 17 june 2016 on the conclusion, on behalf of the european union, of the protocol to eliminate illicit trade in tobacco products to the world health organisation's framework convention on tobacco control, with the exception of its provisions falling within the scope of title v of part three of the treaty on the functioning of the european union (oj l 268, 1.10.2016, p. 1). council decision (eu) 2016/1750 of 17 june 2016 on the conclusion, on behalf of the european union, of the protocol to eliminate illicit trade in tobacco products to the world health organisation's framework convention on tobacco control, as regards its provisions on obligations related to judicial cooperation in criminal matters and the definition of criminal offences (oj l 268, 1.10.2016, p. 6).

name: council decision (eu) 2019/664 of 15 april 2019 amending decision no 940/2014/eu as regards products eligible for exemption from or a reduction in dock dues type: decision subject matter: taxation; overseas countries and territories; european union law; regions and regional policy; economic conditions; international trade date published: 2019-04-26 26.4.2019 en official journal of the european union l 112/21 council decision (eu) 2019/664 of 15 april 2019 amending decision no 940/2014/eu as regards products eligible for exemption from or a reduction in dock dues the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 349 thereof, having regard to the proposal from the european commission, after transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments, having regard to the opinion of the european parliament (1), acting in accordance with a special legislative procedure, whereas: (1) council decision no 940/2014/eu (2) authorises the french authorities to apply exemptions or reductions to dock dues for products produced locally in the french overseas departments and listed in the annex to that decision. the maximum authorised tax differential is, depending on the products and the overseas department in question, 10, 20 or 30 percentage points. (2) pursuant to decision no 940/2014/eu, on 12 february 2018 the french authorities presented to the commission a report on the application of the tax arrangements provided for in that decision. specific evaluation reports for each of the french outermost regions accompanied by requests to adapt the list of products eligible for differentiated taxation were sent on 15 march 2018 for french guiana, martinique and guadeloupe, on 4 june 2018 for r union and, without a request to adapt the list, on 28 august 2018 for mayotte. an additional request for the inclusion of a new product on the list was made for french guiana on 26 october 2018. (3) on the basis of the report presented on 12 february 2018 by the french authorities, the commission presented to the council the report as provided for in decision no 940/2014/eu and a proposal for amendments to that decision. those proposed amendments concern martinique, guadeloupe, french guiana and r union, and consist of the inclusion of new products on the list and of an increase, for certain products, of the authorised differential. (4) in the case of french guiana, the combined nomenclature codes should be updated in the annex to decision no 940/2014/eu. (5) the adaptation of the lists is justified in each case in view of the additional costs of locally produced products compared with equivalent imported products produced in the union. (6) the adaptations that should be made are mostly to be entered on the lists in the annex to decision no 940/2014/eu for products which were already produced locally in 2014 and for which no application for inclusion on lists had been submitted in 2014. (7) in french guiana the products concerned are cement (product 2523 29 00) and wooden furniture (products 9403 30, 9403 50 00, 9403 60 and 9403 90 30). (8) in martinique the products concerned are some plastic pellets (product 3907 61 00) and cold rooms (product 8418 69 00). (9) in guadeloupe the products concerned are some meats (product 0210 12 19), some sauces (product 2103 90 90), denatured ethyl alcohol (product 2207 20 00), some fertilisers (products 2833, 2834 and 2836), some cosmetics (products 3303 00 90 and 3304 99 00), some cooling liquids (product 3820 00 00) and paper and paperboard boxes and cases (product 4819 10 00). (10) in r union the products concerned are some printed products (product 4911 99), some hygiene products (products 4818 20 10 and 4818 20 91), some spare parts for vehicles (products 8511 40 00, 8511 50 00 and 8511 90 00), some ventilation ducts and their accessories (products 7306 30 80, 7306 61 92 and 7307 99 80), solar water heaters (product 8419 90 85), some fertilisers (product 3102 10 90) and some tomato pur es (product 2002 90 11). (11) in the agricultural sector, requests for inclusion or reclassification on lists are motivated by the need for local producers to diversify their production in order better to cope with the vagaries of the weather. the products which should be entered on the lists in the annex to decision no 940/2014/eu for martinique are certain vegetables (products 0709 30 00, 0709 40 00, 0709 93 90 and 0714) and avocados (product 0804 40 00), for guadeloupe pineapples (product 0804 30) and peppers (product 0904 22 00) and for r union onions (product 0703 10 19) and garlic (product 0703 20 00). in addition, for martinique, some vegetables (product 0706), some peppers (product 0709 60), pineapples (product 0804 30) and citrus fruits (product 0805) should be reclassified on list b. (12) for certain products already entered on the lists in the annex to decision no 940/2014/eu the maximum differential concerned should either be extended to subheadings of the combined nomenclature to which it does not apply at present, or increased. (13) in martinique yoghurts (product 0403 10) and some plastic construction products (product 3925) should be reclassified from list b to list c, while frozen vegetables (product 0710), prefabricated buildings (product 9406), some items of jewellery (products 7113 and 7117) and solar water heaters (product 8419 19) should be reclassified from list a to list b. (14) in guadeloupe, all prepared or preserved meat (product 1602) and not just products under heading 1602 41 10, all prepared or preserved fish (product 1604 20) and not just prepared or preserved salmon (product 1604 20 10) and, with regard to fertilisers, products under headings 3102, 3103, 3104 and 3105, and not just subheadings 3102 90, 3103 90, 3104 20 and 3105 20, should be entered on list b. yoghurts (product 0403 10), some non-alcoholic beverages (products 2202 10 00 and 2202 99 19) and some building materials (products 3925 10 00 and 3925 90 80) should also be reclassified from list b to list c. (15) in the agri-food industry in r union, sugar (product 1701), canned tomatoes (product 2002 10) and some coatings (product 3214 10 90) should be reclassified from list a to list c, some canned dried vegetables (products 2005 51 00 and 2005 99 80), some paints (products 3208 and 3209), polyethylene films and bags (products 3920 10 and 3923 21), and some boxes and cartons (product 4819 20 00) should be reclassified from list b to list c, and some fruit pur es (product 2007 99 50) should be reclassified from list a to list b. (16) in martinique, an error concerning the tariff heading entered on the list in the annex to decision no 940/2014/eu should be corrected and heading 2204 29 should be replaced by heading 2204 21. (17) products for which local production did not exist in 2014 but for which it has since started or for which there are specific plans to commence operations in the near future should be entered on the lists of products eligible for differentiated taxation. in french guiana, the products in question are derived from screen printing activities such as printed jackets (product 6110 30 91), printed baby accessories (product 6111 20 90), printed raincoats (product 6201 19 00), printed dresses (product 6204 42 00), printed household linen (product 6302 91 00), printed caps (product 6505 00 30), printed mugs (product 6912 00) and energy wood (product 4401 12 00). in guadeloupe, the products concerned are some beers (product 2203), some waters not containing sugar (product 2201 10 90) and some filtering or purifying machinery (product 8421 21 00). in r union, the products in question are certain hygiene products (product 4818 90 10). (18) decision no 940/2014/eu should therefore be amended accordingly, has adopted this decision: article 1 the annex to decision no 940/2014/eu is amended in accordance with the annex to this decision. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the official journal of the european union. article 3 this decision is addressed to the french republic. done at luxembourg, 15 april 2019. for the council the president p. daea (1) opinion of 27 march 2019 (not yet published in the official journal). (2) council decision no 940/2014/eu of 17 december 2014 concerning the dock dues in the french outermost regions (oj l 367, 23.12.2014, p. 1). annex the annex to decision no 940/2014/eu is amended as follows: 1. part a is amended as follows: (a) the following products are inserted in point 1: 0904 22 00, 2103 90 90, 2207 20 00, 3820 00 00, 4819 10 00; (b) product 2523 29 00 is inserted in point 2; (c) point 3 is amended as follows: (i) the following products are inserted: 0709 30 00, 0709 40 00, 0709 93 90, 0804 40 00, 0714, 8418 69 00; (ii) the following products are deleted: 0706, 0709 60, 0804 30, 0805, 0710, 7113, 7117, 8419 19, 9406; (d) point 5 is amended as follows: (i) the following products are inserted: 3102 10 90, 8511 40 00, 8511 50 00, 8511 90 00; (ii) the following products are deleted: 1701, 2002 10, 2007 99 50, 3214 10 90; 2. part b is amended as follows: (a) point 1 is amended as follows: (i) the following products are inserted: 0210 12 19, 0804 30, 16 02, 1604 20, 2201 10 90, 2833, 2834, 2836, 3102, 3103, 3104, 3105, 3303 00 90, 3304 99 00; (ii) the following products are deleted: 0403 10, 1602 41 10, 1604 20 10, 2202 10 00, 3102 90, 3103 90, 3104 20, 3105 20, 3925 10 00, 3925 90 80; (b) point 2 is amended as follows: (i) the following products are inserted: 0303 59, 0305 31 00, 0305 44 90, 0305 52 00, 0305 53 90, 0305 54 90, 0305 59 85, 0305 64 00, 4418 91 00, 4418 99, 6110 30 91, 6111 20 90, 6201 19 00, 6204 42 00, 6302 91 00, 6505 00 30, 6912 00, 9403 30, 9403 50 00, 9403 60, 9403 90 30; (ii) the following product is deleted: 0305 59 80; (c) point 3 is amended as follows: (i) the following products are inserted: 3907 61 00, 0706, 0709 60, 0710, 0804 30, 0805, 7113, 7117, 8419 19, 9406; (ii) the following products are deleted: 0403 10, 3925; (d) point 5 is amended as follows: (i) the following products are inserted: 0703 10 19, 0703 20 00, 2002 90 11, 2007 99 50, 4911 99, 4818 20 10, 4818 20 91, 4818 90 10, 7306 30 80, 7306 61 92, 7307 99 80, 8419 90 85; (ii) the following products are deleted: 2005 51 00, 2005 99 80, 3208, 3209, 3920 10, 3923 21, 4819 20 00; 3. part c is amended as follows: (a) the following products are inserted in point 1: 2203, 8421 21 00, 0403 10, 2202 10 00, 2202 99 19, 3925 10 00, 3925 90 80; (b) point 2 is amended as follows: (i) the following products are inserted: 4401 12 00, 9406 90 10, 9406 10 00, 9406 90 38; (ii) the following products are deleted: 9406 00 11, 9406 00 20, 9406 00 38; (c) point 3 is amended as follows: (i) the following products are inserted: 0403 10, 3925, 2204 21; (ii) the following product is deleted: 2204 29; (d) the following products are inserted in point 5: 1701, 2002 10, 2005 51 00, 2005 99 80, 3208, 3209, 3214 10 90, 3920 10, 3923 21, 4819 20 00.

name: decision of the board of governors of the european investment bank of 16 april 2019 on the replacement of the capital of the united kingdom in the european investment bank by capital subscribed by the remaining member states [2019/655] type: decision subject matter: european construction; europe; eu institutions and european civil service; business organisation date published: 2019-04-25 25.4.2019 en official journal of the european union l 110/39 decision of the board of governors of the european investment bank of 16 april 2019 on the replacement of the capital of the united kingdom in the european investment bank by capital subscribed by the remaining member states [2019/655] the board of governors of the european investment bank, having regard to articles 4(3) and 5(2) of the statute, whereas the united kingdom is expected to withdraw from the european union as of 30 march 2019 in accordance with the provisions of article 50 of the treaty on european union, whereas in accordance with article 308 of the treaty on the functioning of the european union, the members of the european investment bank are the member states, whereas the withdrawal of the united kingdom from the european union will bring an end to the membership of the united kingdom in the european investment bank and to its subscribed capital in the bank, whereas the withdrawal of the united kingdom from the european union should not affect the financing activity and the business model of the european investment bank, whereas the maintenance of the capital of the bank requires an increase of the capital subscribed by the remaining member states, whereas the paid-in portion of this increase of the capital subscribed by the remaining member states should amount to eur 3 495 903 950, to be funded entirely from the additional reserves of the bank, in order to preserve the paid-in portion of the total subscribed capital at its current level, whereas the maintenance of the capital of the bank should go in parallel with a further strengthening of the governance of the bank, whereas the function of the board of directors should be strengthened, allowing the nomination of additional alternates, and better use should be made of alternate board members and non-voting experts to enhance their support to the decision-making process of the board of directors, in particular regarding the analysis of financing proposals, whereas the use of qualified majority voting in the board of directors and the board of governors should be extended to crucial areas, namely the decision on the bank's operational plan, the appointment of members of the management committee and the approval of the rules of procedure, whereas the bank should take further initiatives to reflect, in line with best banking practice, the principles of three lines of defence, at all relevant levels of the institution, including in the management committee, whereas in line with member states' expectations, lending volumes should be kept sustainable and a framework for determining sustainable lending levels should be further developed, whereas the function of the audit committee shall be strengthened by making sure that the committee has amongst its members knowledge on supervisory issues, the selection process for members of the audit committee should also be explored to ensure, inter alia, that the audit committee always includes members drawn from a banking supervisory authority from both inside and outside the euro area, whereas the council is requested to adopt, in parallel, the necessary amendments to the statute of the bank in accordance with article 308 of the treaty on the functioning of the european union, whereas certain member states expressed interest to subscribe additional capital in the bank, and the board of governors calls upon the board of directors to put forward a proposal in this matter at the latest for the annual meeting in 2019, the board of governors of the european investment bank has therefore decided unanimously as follows: 1. with effect from the withdrawal of the united kingdom from the european union, the capital subscribed by the remaining member states shall be increased by eur 39 195 022 000, in proportion to each member state's share in the total subscribed capital of eur 204 089 132 500. the subscribed capital of the bank shall therefore be restored to eur 243 284 154 500, subscribed by the member states as follows: germany 46 722 369 149 france 46 722 369 149 italy 46 722 369 149 spain 28 033 421 847 belgium 12 951 115 777 netherlands 12 951 115 777 sweden 8 591 781 713 denmark 6 557 521 657 austria 6 428 994 386 poland 5 980 679 827 finland 3 693 702 498 greece 3 512 961 713 portugal 2 263 904 037 czechia 2 206 922 328 hungary 2 087 849 195 ireland 1 639 379 073 romania 1 513 926 692 croatia 1 062 312 542 slovakia 751 236 149 slovenia 697 455 090 bulgaria 510 041 217 lithuania 437 633 208 luxembourg 327 878 318 cyprus 321 508 011 latvia 267 076 094 estonia 206 248 240 malta 122 381 664 2. with effect from the withdrawal of the united kingdom from the european union, additional reserves of the bank to the amount of eur 3 495 903 950 shall be drawn from free reserves, and be transformed into paid-in capital by way of transfer from the bank's additional reserves to its capital. the amount shall be allocated to the paid-in capital of the member states in proportion to each member state's share in the total amount of eur 243 284 154 500. 3. consequently, from the withdrawal of the united kingdom from the european union, the first subparagraph of article 4(1) of the statute of the bank shall be amended, and read as follows: the capital of the bank shall be eur 243 284 154 500, subscribed by the member states as follows: germany 46 722 369 149 france 46 722 369 149 italy 46 722 369 149 spain 28 033 421 847 belgium 12 951 115 777 netherlands 12 951 115 777 sweden 8 591 781 713 denmark 6 557 521 657 austria 6 428 994 386 poland 5 980 679 827 finland 3 693 702 498 greece 3 512 961 713 portugal 2 263 904 037 czechia 2 206 922 328 hungary 2 087 849 195 ireland 1 639 379 073 romania 1 513 926 692 croatia 1 062 312 542 slovakia 751 236 149 slovenia 697 455 090 bulgaria 510 041 217 lithuania 437 633 208 luxembourg 327 878 318 cyprus 321 508 011 latvia 267 076 094 estonia 206 248 240 malta 122 381 664 4. this decision shall take effect as of the withdrawal of the united kingdom from the european union. it shall be published in the official journal of the european union. for the board of governors the chairman e.o. teodorovici the secretary m. santoni

name: council decision (eu) 2019/634 of 9 april 2019 on the signing, on behalf of the union, of the status agreement between the european union and bosnia and herzegovina on actions carried out by the european border and coast guard agency in bosnia and herzegovina type: decision subject matter: international affairs; international law; migration; politics and public safety; european construction; cooperation policy; europe; eu institutions and european civil service date published: 2019-04-24 24.4.2019 en official journal of the european union l 109/1 council decision (eu) 2019/634 of 9 april 2019 on the signing, on behalf of the union, of the status agreement between the european union and bosnia and herzegovina on actions carried out by the european border and coast guard agency in bosnia and herzegovina the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular points (b) and (d) of article 77(2) and point (c) of article 79(2), in conjunction with article 218(5) thereof, having regard to the proposal from the european commission, whereas: (1) pursuant to article 54(4) of regulation (eu) 2016/1624 of the european parliament and of the council (1), in cases where it is envisaged that european border and coast guard teams are deployed to a third country to carry out actions for which the team members have executive powers, or where it is required by other actions in third countries, a status agreement is to be concluded by the union with the third country concerned. that status agreement should cover all aspects that are necessary for carrying out the actions. (2) on 16 october 2017, the council authorised the commission to open negotiations with bosnia and herzegovina for a status agreement on actions carried out by the european border and coast guard agency in bosnia and herzegovina (the agreement). (3) the negotiations were successfully finalised by the initialling of the agreement in january 2019. (4) this decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the schengen acquis in which the united kingdom does not take part, in accordance with council decision 2000/365/ec (2); the united kingdom is therefore not taking part in the adoption of this decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application. (5) this decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the schengen acquis in which ireland does not take part, in accordance with council decision 2002/192/ec (3); ireland is therefore not taking part in the adoption of this decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application. (6) in accordance with articles 1 and 2 of protocol no 22 on the position of denmark, annexed to the treaty on european union and to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application. given that this decision builds upon the schengen acquis, denmark shall, in accordance with article 4 of that protocol, decide within a period of six months after the council has decided on this decision whether it will implement it in its national law. (7) therefore, the agreement should be signed and the annexed joint declaration should be approved, has adopted this decision: article 1 the signing on behalf of the union of the status agreement between the european union and bosnia and herzegovina on actions carried out by the european border and coast guard agency in bosnia and herzegovina is hereby authorised, subject to the conclusion of the said agreement (4). article 2 the joint declaration annexed to this decision shall be approved on behalf of the union. article 3 the president of the council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the agreement on behalf of the union. article 4 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at luxembourg, 9 april 2019. for the council the president g. ciamba (1) regulation (eu) 2016/1624 of the european parliament and of the council of 14 september 2016 on the european border and coast guard and amending regulation (eu) 2016/399 of the european parliament and of the council and repealing regulation (ec) no 863/2007 of the european parliament and of the council, council regulation (ec) no 2007/2004 and council decision 2005/267/ec (oj l 251, 16.9.2016, p. 1). (2) council decision 2000/365/ec of 29 may 2000 concerning the request of the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the schengen acquis (oj l 131, 1.6.2000, p. 43). (3) council decision 2002/192/ec of 28 february 2002 concerning ireland's request to take part in some of the provisions of the schengen acquis (oj l 64, 7.3.2002, p. 20). (4) the text of the agreement will be published together with the decision on its conclusion. annex joint declaration with regard to iceland, norway, switzerland and liechtenstein the parties to the status agreement between the european union and bosnia and herzegovina on actions carried out by the european border and coast guard agency in bosnia and herzegovina take note of the close relationship between the european union and norway, iceland, switzerland and liechtenstein, particularly by virtue of the agreements of 18 may 1999 and 26 october 2004 concerning the association of those countries with the implementation, application and development of the schengen acquis. in such circumstances it is desirable that the authorities of norway, iceland, switzerland and liechtenstein, on the one hand, and bosnia and herzegovina, on the other hand, conclude, without delay, bilateral agreements on actions carried out by the european border and coast guard agency in bosnia and herzegovina in terms similar to those of the status agreement between the european union and bosnia and herzegovina on actions carried out by the european border and coast guard agency in bosnia and herzegovina.

name: council decision (cfsp) 2019/615 of 15 april 2019 on union support for activities leading up to the 2020 review conference of the parties to the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons (npt) type: decision subject matter: international affairs; international security; defence; electrical and nuclear industries; european construction; energy policy date published: 2019-04-16 16.4.2019 en official journal of the european union l 105/25 council decision (cfsp) 2019/615 of 15 april 2019 on union support for activities leading up to the 2020 review conference of the parties to the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons (npt) the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on european union, and in particular article 28(1), in conjunction with 31(1) thereof, having regard to the proposal from the high representative of the union for foreign affairs and security policy, whereas: (1) the 2020 review conference of the parties to the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons (the 2020 npt review conference) marks several important dates for the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons (npt), such as the 50th anniversary of its entry into force and the 25th anniversary of the adoption by the 1995 npt review conference of decision 3 (extension of the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons), which extended the npt indefinitely. (2) on 12 december 2003, the european council adopted the european union strategy against proliferation of weapons of mass destruction (the 2003 eu strategy against wmd). the 2003 eu strategy against wmd identifies support for the npt as a first priority for action at the international level, and calls for the preservation of the integrity, and the universalisation, of the npt, the iaea safeguard agreements and the protocols attached to the npt and the iaea safeguard agreements. (3) in accordance with the 2016 global strategy for the european union's foreign and security policy and the 2003 eu strategy against wmd, the union's actions continue to be grounded in the conviction that a multilateral approach to security, including disarmament and non-proliferation, provides the best way to maintain international order and hence the commitment to uphold, implement and strengthen the multilateral disarmament and non-proliferation treaties and agreements. (4) in the united nations secretary-general's agenda for disarmament securing our common future, presented on 24 may 2018, it was underlined that the npt has come to be regarded as a key pillar of the international security architecture. (5) the union is actively engaging in the current npt review cycle, which started with the first session of the preparatory committee that took place in vienna from 2 to 12 may 2017. the second session of the preparatory committee took place in geneva from 23 april to 4 may 2018. the third session of the preparatory committee will take place in new york from 29 april to 10 may 2019, and the 2020 review conference of the parties to the npt will take place in new york from 27 april to 22 may 2020. (6) the european union considers the npt the cornerstone of the global nuclear non-proliferation regime, the essential foundation for the pursuit of nuclear disarmament in accordance with article vi, and an important element in the further development of the application of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. in this regard, the council adopted common position 2005/329/pesc (1), decision 2010/212/cfsp (2), and conclusions on the ninth npt review conference of the parties to the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, has adopted this decision: article 1 1. for the purpose of giving immediate and practical application to elements of the 2003 eu strategy against wmd, the union shall support activities aimed at upholding and preserving the integrity of the npt, through a balanced focus on the three equally important and mutually reinforcing pillars of the npt: disarmament, non-proliferation and the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. 2. in order to achieve the objective referred to in paragraph 1, the union shall support the following outreach activities by the leadership of the 2020 review conference: (a) three thematic seminars for state parties on nuclear disarmament, nuclear non-proliferation and peaceful uses of nuclear energy; (b) up to four regional meetings in the asia-pacific, africa, latin america and the caribbean, and the middle east; and (c) two side events during the seventy-fourth session of the first committee of the general assembly and during the 2020 npt review conference. a description of this project is set out in the annex. article 2 1. the high representative of the union for the common foreign and security policy (the high representative) shall be responsible for the implementation of this decision. 2. the implementation of the project referred to in article 1(2) shall be carried out by the united nations office for disarmament affairs (hereinafter unoda). article 3 1. the financial reference amount for the implementation of the project referred to in article 1(2) shall be eur 1 299 883,68. 2. the expenditure financed by the amount set out in paragraph 1 shall be managed in accordance with the procedures and rules applicable to the union budget. 3. the commission shall supervise the proper management of the financial reference referred to in paragraph 1. for that purpose, it shall conclude a financing agreement with unoda. the financing agreement shall stipulate that unoda is to ensure the visibility of the union's contribution, appropriate to its size. 4. the commission shall endeavour to conclude the financing agreement referred to in paragraph 3 as soon as possible after the entry into force of this decision. it shall inform the council of any difficulties relating to that process and of the date of conclusion of that financing agreement. article 4 the high representative shall report on a regular basis, at least once a year, to the council on the implementation of this decision, on the basis of reports prepared by unoda. those reports shall form the basis for the evaluation to be carried out by the council. the commission shall report on the financial aspects of the implementation of the project referred to in article 1(2). article 5 1. this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. 2. this decision shall expire 18 months after the date of conclusion of the financing agreement referred to in article 3(3). however, it shall expire six months after the date of its entry into force if that financing agreement has not been concluded by six months from the entry into force of this decision. done at luxembourg, 15 april 2019. for the council the president p. daea (1) council common position 2005/329/pesc of 25 april 2005 relating to the 2005 review conference of the parties to the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons (oj l 106, 27.4.2005, p. 32). (2) council decision 2010/212/cfsp of 29 march 2010 relating to the position of the european union for the 2010 review conference of the parties to the treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons (oj l 90, 10.4.2010, p. 8). annex 1. objectives the 2020 npt review conference will be a very significant moment for the nuclear non-proliferation regime. the european union considers the npt the cornerstone of the global nuclear non-proliferation regime, the essential foundation for the pursuit of nuclear disarmament in accordance with article vi, and an important element in the further development of the applications of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. beginning in 2017, chairs of the npt's preparatory committee sessions have been working to build continuity between the preparatory committee sessions of the review cycle, including through the development of thematic common ground and through a series of regional consultations in the asia-pacific, africa and latin america. these consultations have been warmly welcomed by states of those regions, as they provide access to the preparatory committee chairs for capital-based experts and an opportunity for dialogue for states without the resources to maintain large delegations in new york, geneva or vienna, and offer important occasions to discuss key regional priorities. those consultations have significantly added to the deliberations in the formal npt setting. the objective of this project can be aided by building on and enhancing the work of the chairs of the 2017 and 2018 preparatory committee sessions, through a global consultation process involving the state parties to the npt, the president-designate of the 2020 npt review conference and the chairs of the preparatory committee sessions. this project will promote preparations in advance of the conference, will support the leadership in understanding the nuances of state parties' positions and earning their trust, and will facilitate dialogue between state parties and the president-designate on how to overcome obstacles to success in 2020. main goals: 1. to gain an understanding of concerns and priorities for the 2020 npt review cycle, based on deliberations at the 2017, 2018 and 2019 preparatory committee sessions, including concerns and priorities from a regional perspective, and to contribute to the effective formulation of concerns and priorities in the 2020 npt review conference. 2. to raise awareness of obstacles, as well as potential areas for convergence on the basis of the many benefits the npt provides, including through the incorporation of a broader array of voices, such as technical experts from regulatory agencies and scientific faculties, and decision-makers such as parliamentarians. 3. to build trust and confidence between states and the president-designate in order to develop the strong relationships required for a successful outcome of the 2020 npt review conference. 4. to encourage flexibility and compromise from states in approaching the 2020 npt review conference, and to seek ideas on both how to achieve common ground and how to overcome divisions. 5. to develop input for a roadmap for producing a successful outcome of the 2020 npt review conference, including possible actions and recommendations for the full implementation of the npt. 2. description of the activities the union project to support the 2020 npt review conference cycle will involve: (a) thematic seminars for state parties across the three pillars of the npt: nuclear disarmament, nuclear non-proliferation and the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. three thematic seminars, in geneva (disarmament), new york (non-proliferation), and vienna (peaceful uses), targeted at government representatives, experts, academia, civil society and industry. (b) regional outreach by the leadership of the npt 2020 review conference convening of up to four regional meetings in the asia-pacific, africa, latin america and the caribbean, and the middle east. (c) side-events two side events to be organised during the seventy-fourth session of the first committee of the general assembly and during the 2020 npt review conference. these elements are presented in more detail below. 2.1. thematic seminars 2.1.1. aim the aim of each thematic seminar is to raise awareness about the challenges and opportunities across the npt's three pillars. in particular, the seminars will seek to highlight the many benefits already provided by the npt and the need to preserve those benefits. the seminars will also seek to generate elements for practical action and recommendations for producing consensus in 2020. 2.1.2. the project will hold three seminars: as noted, each seminar will address one of the pillars of the npt: disarmament, non-proliferation and the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. in addition to exploring the interrelationships between the three pillars, discussions will include but are not limited to: implementation of commitments made in previous review cycles; bridging divides over how to achieve and maintain a world without nuclear weapons; strengthening the non-proliferation regime; access to the benefits of peaceful uses of nuclear technology, including for the purpose of facilitating the achievement of the sustainable development goals; and strengthening the npt review process. 2.1.3. format the president-designate will brief state parties on developments in each pillar, outlining challenges and opportunities. panels of regional experts, experts from relevant international organisations, such as the international atomic energy agency (iaea) and the comprehensive nuclear-test ban treaty organisation (ctbto), and experts from united nations institute for disarmament research (unidir), will be convened with a view to generating discussion and formulating ideas. the seminar on peaceful uses of nuclear energy, to be held in vienna, will also include the participation of representatives of national bodies and structures that are involved in peaceful uses of nuclear energy. the seminars will then engage in interactive question and answers (q&a) sessions between the president-designate, state parties' representatives and experts. 2.1.4. location the three thematic seminars will be organised as follows: geneva (disarmament); new york (non-proliferation) and vienna (peaceful uses of nuclear energy). 2.1.5. timing the three thematic seminars will take place after the third preparatory committee session (29 april-10 may 2019), under the leadership and coordination of the president-designate of the 2020 npt review conference. the dates for these meetings will be set after the third session of the preparatory committee, between may 2019 and march 2020. 2.1.6. responsibilities of the implementing agency: substantive preparation: in consultation with the president-designate, unoda will develop the substance of the seminars, and the agenda and selection of speakers/experts. logistics and conference services: unoda will implement the logistical arrangements (booking venues, organising catering, audiovisual equipment, travel arrangements for participants and experts etc.) for the thematic seminars. 2.2. regional meetings 2.2.1. aim the aim of each regional meeting is to enhance understanding of the current state of play, discuss options for cooperative engagement, generate solutions and build relationships to facilitate a successful conclusion to the 2020 npt review conference. 2.2.2. topics the regional meetings in the asia-pacific, africa, and latin america and the caribbean, will cover all three of the npt pillars. they will address the major issues affecting the npt and its state parties, on the basis of the deliberations in the 2017, 2018 and 2019 npt preparatory committee sessions, and present those issues through the lens of respective regional priorities and concerns. those issues will include, but will not be limited to: the implementation of commitments made in previous review cycles; bridging divides over how to achieve and maintain a world without nuclear weapons; strengthening the non-proliferation regime; access to the benefits of peaceful uses of nuclear technology, including for the purpose of facilitating achievement of the sustainable development goals; and strengthening the npt review process. the regional meeting in the middle east will specifically address the implementation of the 1995 npt resolution on the creation of a middle east zone free of nuclear weapons and all other weapons of mass destruction, including their means of delivery. the challenges that this issue poses to a successful outcome of the 2020 npt review conference require the organisation of a standalone meeting in this region. 2.2.3. format the regional meetings will take the format of interactive consultations. at each regional meeting, the president-designate will be given the opportunity to present the state of play on the review cycle. the chairperson will then pose a series of questions to states to foster an interactive question and answer style environment. the meetings will also utilise panels of regional and thematic experts, including experts from relevant international organisations, such as international atomic energy agency (iaea), as well as the comprehensive test ban treaty organisation (ctbto) and from united nations institute for disarmament research (unidir) to generate discussions and ideas. 2.2.4. location the regional meetings are designed to support interaction with governments from specific regions in preparing for the 2020 npt review conference. the following four regional meetings are suggested: countries from regions/sub-regions: suggested venue: africa addis ababa latin america/caribbean buenos aires asia-pacific jakarta middle east amman 2.2.5. timing the four regional meetings will be held in a twelve-month period, between march 2019 and march 2020. the exact timing and sequencing (i.e. the order of the regions covered) of the regional meetings will be determined by the implementing agency, in consultation with the president-designate of the 2020 npt review conference and the union, taking into account the un disarmament calendar. each regional meeting will run for up to two days. the president-designate of the 2020 npt review conference will chair the four regional meetings. 2.2.6. responsibilities of the implementing agency substantive preparation: in consultation with the chairs of the three sessions of preparatory committee, and under the leadership of the president-designate of the 2020 npt review conference, unoda will develop the substance of the regional meetings, the agenda and the selection of speakers/experts. logistics and meeting support: unoda, together with regional host states, will implement the logistical arrangements (booking venues, organising catering, audiovisual equipment, travel arrangements for participants and experts etc.) for the regional meetings. 2.3. side-events two side events will be held during the seventy-fourth session of the first committee of the general assembly (october 2019) and during the 2020 npt review conference, respectively. the side event to be held in october 2019 will provide an opportunity for the chairs of the three preparatory committee sessions and the president-designate to discuss the preparations for the 2020 npt review conference. the side event to be held during the 2020 npt review conference will provide an opportunity to share the outcomes of the thematic seminars and regional meetings and their contribution to the preparations for the conference. 2.3.1. responsibilities of the implementing agency substantive preparation: in consultation with the chairs of the three sessions of the preparatory committee and the president-designate of the 2020 npt review conference, unoda will develop the concept note for the side events and the agenda and selection of speakers/experts. logistics and meeting support: unoda will implement the logistical arrangements (booking venues, organising catering, audiovisual equipment, travel arrangements for experts etc.) for the side events. 3. reporting and assessment the unoda will submit to the high representative and to the commission a final financial and narrative report containing, inter alia, lessons learnt, as well as brief reports following each meeting focusing on key takeaways. 4. duration the duration of the implementation of the project is 18 months. 5. eu visibility unoda shall take all appropriate measures to publicise that this project has been funded by the union. the union's support will be highlighted in public and closed presentations and briefings of the president-designate. the union's support will also be acknowledged in invitations and other documents that are shared with the participants of the various events. unoda will ensure that the union will be represented in all events that are supported under this decision. 6. implementing agency the united nations office for disarmament affairs (unoda) will be entrusted with the implementation of this project. the implementation of this project will be in accordance with the financing agreement to be concluded between the european commission and the unoda.

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/609 of 11 april 2019 amending implementing decision 2014/709/eu as regards the use of the pathogen identification test for african swine fever, the dispatch of the pigs through areas listed in the annex and the applicability of the decision (notified under document c(2019) 2739) (text with eea relevance.) type: decision_impl subject matter: agricultural policy; agricultural activity; international trade; foodstuff; industrial structures and policy; means of agricultural production; economic geography date published: 2019-04-15 15.4.2019 en official journal of the european union l 104/92 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/609 of 11 april 2019 amending implementing decision 2014/709/eu as regards the use of the pathogen identification test for african swine fever, the dispatch of the pigs through areas listed in the annex and the applicability of the decision (notified under document c(2019) 2739) (text with eea relevance) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to council directive 89/662/eec of 11 december 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), and in particular article 9(4) thereof, having regard to council directive 90/425/eec of 26 june 1990 concerning veterinary checks applicable in intra-union trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (2), and in particular article 10(4) thereof, having regard to council directive 2002/99/ec of 16 december 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption (3), and in particular article 4(3) thereof, whereas: (1) commission implementing decision 2014/709/eu (4) lays down animal health control measures in relation to african swine fever in the member states or areas thereof listed in the annex thereto (the member states concerned). that implementing decision provides for prohibitions on the dispatch of consignments of domestic pigs and pig products, as well as consignments of feral pigs and feral pig products from the areas listed in the annex thereto. it also lays down other rules aimed at preventing the spread of african swine fever, including information requirements for member states. the animal health control measures laid down in implementing decision 2014/709/eu apply in parallel to those laid down in council directive 2002/60/ec (5), and are intended to combat the spread of african swine fever particularly at union level. (2) implementing decision 2014/709/eu also provides for derogations from the prohibition on the dispatch of live pigs from certain areas listed in the annex to that implementing decision subject to compliance with certain conditions. (3) the pathogen identification test (namely, virus genome detection by the polymerase chain reaction as outlined by the eu reference laboratory for african swine fever) for african swine fever is the most effective tool for an early identification of that disease, as demonstrated by the experience gained by the member states during the evolution of that disease in the union, and as documented by the european food safety authority (efsa) in the scientific report of efsa on epidemiological analyses on african swine fever in the baltic countries and poland, published on 23 march 2017; in the scientific report of efsa on epidemiological analyses of african swine fever in the baltic states and poland, published on 8 november 2017; and in the scientific report of efsa on epidemiological analyses of african swine fever in the european union, published on 29 november 2018 (6). accordingly, the pathogen identification test for african swine fever should replace the laboratory testing currently required by the implementing decision 2014/709/eu. articles 3 and 8 of that implementing decision should therefore be amended accordingly. (4) provided that certain animal health conditions laid down in implementing decision 2014/709/eu are implemented and properly adhered to, the dispatch of live pigs from areas listed in part ii of the annex to implementing decision 2014/709/eu to areas listed in part ii or iii of that annex of another member state through adjacent areas that are already listed in the annex forming a territorial continuity of restrictions due to african swine fever, does not pose a risk of further virus transmission as the pigs are only transported through restricted areas. therefore, the approval of the competent authorities of the member states of the places of transit and of destination for such trade, and certain information requirements on the member state of origin to the commission and the other member states should not be required. consequently, article 3(4) of implementing decision 2014/709/eu should be amended accordingly. (5) the period of application of the measures provided for in implementing decision 2014/709/eu should take account of the epidemiology of african swine fever and also the timeframe set out in the chapter on african swine fever in the terrestrial animal health code of the world organisation for animal health to regain african swine fever disease-free status. therefore, given the current epidemiological situation in the union and in neighbouring third countries and the efforts required to combat that disease, while at the same time not imposing unnecessary restrictions on trade, the period of application of implementing decision 2014/709/eu should be extended until 21 april 2021. that date takes into account the date of application of regulation (eu) 2016/429 of the european parliament and of the council (7) which applies from 21 april 2021 and provides for safeguard measures in the event of animal diseases. it is important to have continuity of measures against african swine fever at union level in light of the current epidemic of that disease. (6) the measures provided for in this decision are in accordance with the opinion of the standing committee on plants, animals, food and feed, has adopted this decision: article 1 implementing decision 2014/709/eu is amended as follows: (1) article 3 is amended as follows: (a) paragraph 2 is replaced by the following: 2. the pigs have been subjected to a pathogen identification test for african swine fever, carried out with negative results on samples taken in accordance with the sampling procedures as laid down in the plan for the eradication of african swine fever referred to in the second paragraph of article 1 of this decision within a period of 7 days prior to the date of the movement and a clinical examination for african swine fever has been carried out on each consignment of pigs by an official veterinarian in accordance with the checking and sampling procedures laid down in part a of chapter iv of the annex to commission decision 2003/422/ec (*1) within the 24-hour period prior to the movement of the pigs, or (*1) commission decision 2003/422/ec of 26 may 2003 approving an african swine fever diagnostic manual (oj l 143, 11.6.2003, p. 35);" (b) paragraph 3 is amended as follows: (i) point (a)(ii) is replaced by the following: (ii) included a clinical examination of the pigs in the holding in accordance with the checking and sampling procedures laid down in part a of chapter iv of the annex to decision 2003/422/ec;; (ii) point (b) is replaced by the following: (b) that implements bio-security requirements for african swine fever as established by the competent authority and ensures that at least the first two dead pigs over the age of 60 days in each production unit each week have been subjected to a pathogen identification test for african swine fever that complies with the general procedures and criteria for the collection and transport of samples laid down in chapter v of the annex to decision 2003/422/ec,; (c) in paragraph 4, points (a) and (b) are replaced by the following: (a) the pigs comply with any other appropriate animal health guarantees based on a positive outcome of a risk assessment of measures against the spread of african swine fever required by the competent authority of the member state of the place of origin, and approved by the competent authorities of the member states of the places of transit and of destination, prior to the movement of the pigs; however, the approval by the competent authorities of the member states of the places of transit and of destination shall not be required when the places of origin, transit and destination of the pigs are all listed areas in the annex and are continuous, thereby ensuring that the pigs are only moved through areas listed in the annex; (b) the member state of the place of origin immediately informs the commission and the other member states of the animal health guarantees and of the approval by the competent authorities referred to in the point (a), and authorises a list of holdings that comply with those animal health guarantees; however, that information from the member state of origin shall not be required when the places of origin, transit and destination of the pigs are all listed areas in the annex and are continuous, thereby ensuring that the pigs are only moved through areas that are listed in the annex; (2) article 8(2) is amended as follows: (a) points (b) and (c) are replaced by the following: (b) they come from a holding which implements bio-security requirements for african swine fever as established by the competent authority and ensures that at least the first two dead pigs over the age of 60 days in each production unit each week have been subjected to a pathogen identification test for african swine fever that complies with the general procedures and criteria for the collection and transport of samples laid down in chapter v of the annex to decision 2003/422/ec; (c) they have been subjected to a pathogen identification test for african swine fever carried out with negative results on samples taken in accordance with the sampling procedures as laid down in the plan for the eradication of african swine fever referred to in the second paragraph of article 1 of this decision within a period of 7 days prior to the date of the movement and a clinical examination for african swine fever has been carried out on each consignment of live pigs by an official veterinarian in accordance with the checking and sampling procedures laid down in part a of chapter iv of the annex to decision 2003/422/ec within the 24-hour period prior to the movement of the live pigs; or (b) in point (d), (ii) and (iii) are replaced by the following: (ii) included a clinical examination of the pigs in the holding in accordance with the checking and sampling procedures laid down in part a of chapter iv of the annex to decision 2003/422/ec; (iii) checked the effective application of the measures provided for in the second indent and in the fourth to seventh indents of article 15(2)(b) of directive 2002/60/ec. (3) in article 21, the date 31 december 2019 is replaced by 21 april 2021. article 2 this decision is addressed to the member states. done at brussels, 11 april 2019. for the commission jyrki katainen vice-president (1) oj l 395, 30.12.1989, p. 13. (2) oj l 224, 18.8.1990, p. 29. (3) oj l 18, 23.1.2003, p. 11. (4) commission implementing decision 2014/709/eu of 9 october 2014 concerning animal health control measures relating to african swine fever in certain member states and repealing implementing decision 2014/178/eu (oj l 295, 11.10.2014, p. 63). (5) council directive 2002/60/ec of 27 june 2002 laying down specific provisions for the control of african swine fever and amending directive 92/119/eec as regards teschen disease and african swine fever (oj l 192, 20.7.2002, p. 27). (6) efsa journal 2017;15(3):4732; efsa journal 2017;15(11):5068; efsa journal 2018;16(11):5494. (7) regulation (eu) 2016/429 of the european parliament and of the council of 9 march 2016 on transmissible animal diseases and amending and repealing certain acts in the area of animal health (animal health law) (oj l 84, 31.3.2016, p. 1).

name: commission delegated decision (eu) 2019/608 of 16 january 2019 amending annex v to directive 2005/36/ec of the european parliament and of the council as regards the evidence of formal qualifications and titles of training courses (notified under document c(2019) 78) (text with eea relevance.) type: decision_del subject matter: health; employment; economic geography; education; construction and town planning date published: 2019-04-15 15.4.2019 en official journal of the european union l 104/1 commission delegated decision (eu) 2019/608 of 16 january 2019 amending annex v to directive 2005/36/ec of the european parliament and of the council as regards the evidence of formal qualifications and titles of training courses (notified under document c(2019) 78) (text with eea relevance) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to directive 2005/36/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 7 september 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications (1), and in particular article 21a(4) thereof, whereas: (1) annex v to directive 2005/36/ec contains lists of the evidence of formal qualifications of doctors of medicine, nurses responsible for general care, dental practitioners, veterinary surgeons, midwives, pharmacists and architects. (2) commission delegated decisions (eu) 2016/790 (2) and (eu) 2017/2113 (3) updated annex v to directive 2005/36/ec following notifications from member states of amendments to their legislative, regulatory and administrative provisions on the issuing of evidence of the formal qualifications in question. since the adoption of those decisions, several member states have notified the commission of further amendments. the commission considers that the amended provisions comply with the conditions set out in title iii, chapter iii of directive 2005/36/ec. annex v to directive 2005/36/ec should therefore be updated. (3) for reasons of clarity and legal certainty, all relevant points of annex v to directive 2005/36/ec on the evidence of formal qualifications and the titles of training courses should be replaced. (4) directive 2005/36/ec should therefore be amended accordingly, has adopted this decision: article 1 annex v to directive 2005/36/ec is amended in accordance with the annex to this decision. article 2 this decision is addressed to the member states. done at brussels, 16 january 2019. for the commission el bieta bie kowska member of the commission (1) oj l 255, 30.9.2005, p. 22. (2) commission delegated decision (eu) 2016/790 of 13 january 2016 amending annex v to directive 2005/36/ec of the european parliament and of the council as regards the evidence of formal qualifications and the titles of training courses (oj l 134, 24.5.2016, p. 135). (3) commission delegated decision (eu) 2017/2113 of 11 september 2017 amending annex v to directive 2005/36/ec of the european parliament and of the council as regards evidence of formal qualifications and the titles of training courses (oj l 317, 1.12.2017, p. 119). annex annex v to directive 2005/36/ec is amended as follows: 1. points 5.1.1 to 5.1.4 are replaced by the following: 5.1.1. evidence of formal qualifications in basic medical training country evidence of formal qualifications body awarding the qualifications certificate accompanying the qualifications reference date belgi /belgique/belgien diploma van arts/dipl 'me de docteur en m decine dipl 'me de m decin/master in de geneeskunde les universit s/de universiteiten le jury comp tent d'enseignement de la communaut fran aise/de bevoegde examencommissie van de vlaamse gemeenschap 20.12.1976 - ' ' - 1.1.2007 esk republika diplom o ukon en studia ve studijn m programu v eobecn l ka stv (doktor medic ny, mudr.) l k sk fakulta univerzity v esk republice 1.5.2004 danmark bevis for kandidatuddannelsen i medicin (cand.med.) universitet 1. autorisation som l ge 20.12.1976 bevis for best et l gevidenskabelig embedseksamen (cand.med.) 2. tilladelse til selvst ndigt virke som l ge deutschland zeugnis ber die rztliche pr fung zeugnis ber die rztliche staatspr fung und zeugnis ber die vorbereitungszeit als medizinalassistent, soweit diese nach den deutschen rechtsvorschriften noch f r den abschluss der rztlichen ausbildung vorgesehen war zust ndige beh rden 20.12.1976 eesti arstikraad degree in medicine (md) diplom arstiteaduse ppekava l bimise kohta tartu likool 1.5.2004 , , 1.1.1981 espa a t tulo de licenciado en medicina y cirug a t tulo de licenciado en medicina t tulo de graduado/a en medicina ministerio de educaci n y cultura el rector de una universidad 1.1.1986 france dipl 'me de fin de deuxi me cycle des tudes m dicales universit s 20.12.1976 hrvatska diploma doktor medicine/doktorica medicine medicinski fakulteti sveu ili ta u republici hrvatskoj 1.7.2013 ireland primary qualification competent examining body certificate of experience 20.12.1976 italia diploma di laurea in medicina e chirurgia universit diploma di abilitazione all'esercizio della medicina e chirurgia 20.12.1976 1.5.2004 (1) (2) (3) latvija rsta diploms universit tes tipa augstskola 1.5.2004 lietuva 1. auk tojo mokslo diplomas, nurodantis suteikt gydytojo kvalifikacij universitetas 1. internat ros pa ym jimas, nurodantis suteikt medicinos gydytojo profesin kvalifikacij 1.5.2004 2. magistro diplomas (medicinos magistro kvalifikacinis laipsnis ir gydytojo kvalifikacija) 2. internat ros pa ym jimas (medicinos gydytojo profesin kvalifikacija) luxembourg dipl 'me d'etat de docteur en m decine, chirurgie et accouchements jury d'examen d'etat certificat de stage 20.12.1976 magyarorsz g okleveles orvosdoktor oklev l (dr. med) egyetem 1.5.2004 malta lawrja ta' tabib tal-medi ina u l-kirur ija universita' ta' malta ertifikat ta' re istrazzjoni ma ru mill-kunsill mediku 1.5.2004 nederland getuigschrift van met goed gevolg afgelegd artsexamen faculteit geneeskunde 20.12.1976 sterreich urkunde ber die verleihung des akademischen grades doktor der gesamten heilkunde (bzw. doctor medicinae universae, dr.med.univ.) medizinische fakult t einer universit t, bzw medizinische universit t 1.1.1994 polska dyplom uko czenia studi w wy szych na kierunku lekarskim z tytu em lekarza szko y wy sze wiadectwo z o enia lekarskiego egzaminu pa stwowego (4)/ wiadectwo z o enia lekarskiego egzaminu ko cowego (5) 1.5.2004 za wiadczenie o uko czeniu sta u podyplomowego portugal carta de curso de licenciatura em medicina certificado de mestrado integrado em medicina universidades certificado emitido pela ordem dos m dicos 1.1.1986 rom nia diplom de licen de doctor medic diploma de licen i master (6) universit i ministerul educa iei na ionale (6) 1.1.2007 slovenija diploma, s katero se podeljuje strokovni naslov doktor medicine/doktorica medicine univerza potrdilo o opravljenem strokovnem izpitu za poklic zdravnik/zdravnica 1.5.2004 slovensko diplom v eobecn lek rstvo doktor v eobecn ho lek rstva (mudr.) univerzita 1.5.2004 suomi/finland l ketieteen lisensiaatin tutkinto/medicine licentiatexamen yliopisto 1.1.1994 sverige l karexamen universitet eller h gskola bevis om legitimation som l kare, utf rdat av socialstyrelsen 1.1.1994 united kingdom primary qualification competent examining body certificate of experience 20.12.1976 5.1.2. evidence of formal qualifications of specialised doctors country evidence of formal qualifications body awarding the qualifications reference date belgi /belgique/belgie bijzondere beroepstitel van geneesheer-specialist/titre professionnel particulier de m decin sp cialiste minister bevoegd voor volksgezondheid/ministre de la sant publique 20.12.1976 ' 1.1.2007 esk republika diplom o specializaci ministerstvo zdravotnictv 1.5.2004 danmark bevis for tilladelse til at betegne sig som speciall ge sundhedsstyrelsen styrelsen for patientsikkerhed 20.12.1976 deutschland fach rztliche anerkennung landes rztekammer 20.12.1976 eesti residentuuri l petamist t endav tunnistus residentuuri l putunnistus eriarstiabi erialal tartu likool 1.5.2004 ' 1. 2. ' 3. 1.1.1981 espa a t tulo de especialista ministerio de educaci n y cultura 1.1.1986 france 1. certificat d' tudes sp ciales de m decine accompagn du dipl 'me d'etat de docteur en m decine 1. universit s 20.12.1976 2. attestation de m decin sp cialiste qualifi accompagn e du dipl 'me d'etat de docteur en m decine 2. conseil de l'ordre des m decins 3. dipl 'me d' tudes sp cialis es ou dipl 'me d' tudes sp cialis es compl mentaires qualifiant de m decine accompagn du dipl 'me d'etat de docteur en m decine 3. universit s hrvatska diploma o specijalisti kom usavr avanju ministarstvo nadle no za zdravstvo 1.7.2013 ireland certificate of specialist doctor competent authority 20.12.1976 italia diploma di medico specialista universit 20.12.1976 ' 1.5.2004 latvija sertifik ts-kompetentu iest u izsniegts dokuments, kas apliecina, ka persona ir nok rtojusi sertifik cijas eks menu specialit t latvijas rstu biedr ba latvijas rstniec bas personu profesion lo organiz ciju savien ba 1.5.2004 lietuva 1. rezident ros pa ym jimas, nurodantis suteikt gydytojo specialisto profesin kvalifikacij 2. rezident ros pa ym jimas (gydytojo specialisto profesin kvalifikacija) universitetas 1.5.2004 luxembourg certificat de m decin sp cialiste ministre de la sant publique 20.12.1976 magyarorsz g szakorvosi bizony tv ny nemzeti vizsgabizotts g 1.5.2004 malta ertifikat ta' spe jalista mediku kumitat ta' approvazzjoni dwar spe jalisti 1.5.2004 nederland bewijs van inschrijving in een specialistenregister medische specialisten registratie commissie (msrc) van de koninklijke nederlandsche maatschappij tot bevordering der geneeskunst sociaal-geneeskundigen registratie commissie (sgrc) van de koninklijke nederlandsche maatschappij tot bevordering der geneeskunst 20.12.1976 diploma geneeskundig specialist registratiecommissie geneeskundig specialisten (rgs) van de koninklijke nederlandsche maatschappij tot bevordering der geneeskunst (7) sterreich facharztdiplom sterreichische rztekammer 1.1.1994 polska dyplom uzyskania tytu u specjalisty centrum egzamin w medycznych 1.5.2004 portugal titulo de especialista ordem dos m dicos 1.1.1986 rom nia certificat de medic specialist ministerul s n t ii 1.1.2007 slovenija potrdilo o opravljenem specialisti nem izpitu 1. ministrstvo za zdravje 2. zdravni ka zbornica slovenije 1.5.2004 slovensko diplom o pecializ cii 1. slovensk zdravotn cka univerzita 2. univerzita komensk ho v bratislave 3. univerzita pavla jozefa af rika v ko iciach 1.5.2004 suomi/finland erikoisl k rin tutkinto/speciall karexamen yliopisto 1.1.1994 sverige bevis om specialkompetens som l kare, utf rdat av socialstyrelsen socialstyrelsen 1.1.1994 united kingdom certificate of completion of training postgraduate medical education and training board 20.12.1976 general medical council 1.4.2010 5.1.3. titles of training courses in specialised medicine anaesthetics general surgery minimum period of training: 3 years minimum period of training: 5 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien anesth sie-r animation/anesthesie-reanimatie chirurgie/heelkunde esk republika anesteziologie a intenzivn medic na chirurgie danmark an stesiologi kirurgi deutschland an sthesiologie (allgemeine) chirurgie eesti anestesioloogia ldkirurgia espa a anestesiolog a y reanimaci n cirug a general y del aparato digestivo france anesth sie-r animation chirurgie g n rale hrvatska anesteziologija, reanimatologija i intenzivna medicina op a kirurgija ireland anaesthesia general surgery italia anestesia, rianimazione e terapia intensiva anestesia, rianimazione, terapia intensiva e del dolore (9) chirurgia generale latvija anesteziolo ija un reanimatolo ija irur ija lietuva anesteziologija reanimatologija chirurgija luxembourg anesth sie-r animation chirurgie g n rale magyarorsz g aneszteziol gia s intenz v ter pia seb szet malta aneste ija u kura intensiva kirur ija enerali nederland anesthesiologie heelkunde sterreich an sthesiologie und intensivmedizin chirurgie allgemeinchirurgie und viszeralchirurgie (8) polska anestezjologia i intensywna terapia chirurgia og lna portugal anestesiologia cirurgia geral rom nia anestezie i terapie intensiv chirurgie general slovenija anesteziologija, reanimatologija in perioperativna intenzivna medicina splo na kirurgija slovensko anest ziol gia a intenz vna medic na chirurgia suomi/finland anestesiologia ja tehohoito/anestesiologi och intensivv rd yleiskirurgia/allm n kirurgi sverige anestesi och intensivv rd kirurgi united kingdom anaesthetics general surgery neurological surgery obstetrics and gynaecology minimum period of training: 5 years minimum period of training: 4 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien neurochirurgie gyn cologie obst trique/gynaecologie verloskunde esk republika neurochirurgie gynekologie a porodnictv danmark neurokirurgi gyn kologi og obstetrik deutschland neurochirurgie frauenheilkunde und geburtshilfe eesti neurokirurgia s nnitusabi ja g nekoloogia - espa a neurocirug a obstetricia y ginecolog a france neurochirurgie gyn cologie obst trique hrvatska neurokirurgija ginekologija i opstetricija ireland neurosurgery obstetrics and gynaecology italia neurochirurgia ginecologia e ostetricia latvija neiro irur ija ginekolo ija un dzemdniec ba lietuva neurochirurgija aku erija ginekologija luxembourg neurochirurgie gyn cologie obst trique magyarorsz g idegseb szet sz l szet-n gy gy szat malta newrokirur ija ostetri ja u inekolo ija nederland neurochirurgie obstetrie en gynaecologie sterreich neurochirurgie frauenheilkunde und geburtshilfe polska neurochirurgia po o nictwo i ginekologia portugal neurocirurgia ginecologia e obstetricia rom nia neurochirurgie obstetric -ginecologie slovenija nevrokirurgija ginekologija in porodni tvo slovensko neurochirurgia gynekol gia a p 'rodn ctvo suomi/finland neurokirurgia/neurokirurgi naistentaudit ja synnytykset/kvinnosjukdomar och f rlossningar sverige neurokirurgi obstetrik och gynekologi united kingdom neurosurgery obstetrics and gynaecology general (internal) medicine ophthalmology minimum period of training: 5 years minimum period of training: 3 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien m decine interne/inwendige geneeskunde ophtalmologie/oftalmologie esk republika vnit n l ka stv oftalmologie danmark oftalmologi deutschland innere medizin augenheilkunde eesti sisehaigused oftalmoloogia espa a medicina interna oftalmolog a france m decine interne ophtalmologie hrvatska op a interna medicina oftalmologija i optometrija ireland general (internal) medicine ophthalmic surgery ophthalmology (10) italia medicina interna oftalmologia latvija intern medic na oftalmolo ija lietuva vidaus ligos oftalmologija luxembourg m decine interne ophtalmologie magyarorsz g belgy gy szat szem szet malta medi ina interna oftalmolo ija nederland interne geneeskunde oogheelkunde sterreich innere medizin augenheilkunde und optometrie polska choroby wewntrzne okulistyka portugal medicina interna oftalmologia rom nia medicin intern oftalmologie slovenija interna medicina oftalmologija slovensko vn torn lek rstvo oftalmol gia suomi/finland sis taudit/inre medicin silm taudit/ gonsjukdomar sverige internmedicin gonsjukdomar (oftalmologi) united kingdom general (internal) medicine ophthalmology otorhinolaryngology paediatrics minimum period of training: 3 years minimum period of training: 4 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien oto-rhino-laryngologie/otorhinolaryngologie p diatrie/pediatrie - - ' esk republika otorinolaryngologie d tsk l ka stv danmark oto-rhino-laryngologi p diatri deutschland hals-nasen-ohrenheilkunde kinder- und jugendmedizin eesti otorinolar ngoloogia pediaatria ' espa a otorrinolaringolog a pediatr a y sus reas especificas france oto-rhino-laryngologie et chirurgie cervico-faciale p diatrie hrvatska otorinolaringologija pedijatrija ireland otolaryngology paediatrics italia otorinolaringoiatria pediatria ' latvija otolaringolo ija pediatrija lietuva otorinolaringologija vaik ligos luxembourg oto-rhino-laryngologie p diatrie magyarorsz g f l-orr-g gegy gy szat csecsem - s gyermekgy gy szat malta otorinolaringolo ija pedjatrija nederland keel-, neus- en oorheelkunde kindergeneeskunde sterreich hals-, nasen- und ohrenkrankheiten hals-, nasen- und ohrenheilkunde (11) kinder- und jugendheilkunde polska otorynolaryngologia pediatria portugal otorrinolaringologia pediatria rom nia otorinolaringologie pediatrie slovenija otorinolaringol gija pediatrija slovensko otorinolaryngol gia pediatria suomi/finland korva-, nen - ja kurkkutaudit/ ron-, n s- och halssjukdomar lastentaudit/barnsjukdomar sverige ron-, n s- och halssjukdomar (oto-rhino-laryngologi) barn- och ungdomsmedicin united kingdom otolaryngology paediatrics respiratory medicine urology minimum period of training: 4 years minimum period of training: 5 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien pneumologie urologie esk republika pneumologie a ftizeologie urologie danmark intern medicin: lungesygdomme urologi deutschland pneumologie innere medizin und pneumologie (12) urologie eesti pulmonoloogia uroloogia - v espa a neumolog a urolog a france pneumologie chirurgie urologique hrvatska pulmologija urologija ireland respiratory medicine urology italia malattie dell'apparato respiratorio urologia latvija ftiziopneimonolo ija urolo ija lietuva pulmonologija urologija luxembourg pneumologie urologie magyarorsz g t d gy gy szat urol gia malta medi ina respiratorja urolo ija nederland longziekten en tuberculose urologie sterreich lungenkrankheiten innere medizin und pneumologie (13) urologie polska choroby p uc urologia portugal pneumologia urologia rom nia pneumologie urologie slovenija pnevmologija urologija slovensko pneumol gia a ftizeol gia urol gia suomi/finland keuhkosairaudet ja allergologia/lungsjukdomar och allergologi urologia/urologi sverige lungsjukdomar (pneumologi) urologi united kingdom respiratory medicine urology orthopaedics pathological anatomy minimum period of training: 5 years minimum period of training: 4 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien chirurgie orthop dique/orthopedische heelkunde anatomie pathologique/pathologische anatomie ' esk republika ortopedie patologie danmark ortop disk kirurgi patologisk anatomi og cytology deutschland orthop die (und unfallchirurgie) orthop die und unfallchirurgie (14) pathologie eesti ortopeedia patoloogia ' espa a cirug a ortop dica y traumatolog a anatom a patol gica france chirurgie orthop dique et traumatologie anatomie et cytologie pathologiques hrvatska ortopedija i traumatologija patologija patologija i citologija (16) ireland trauma and orthopaedic surgery histopathology italia ortopedia e traumatologia anatomia patologica ' latvija traumatolo ija un ortop dija patolo ija lietuva ortopedija traumatologija patologija luxembourg orthop die anatomie pathologique magyarorsz g ortop dia s traumatol gia patol gia malta kirur ija ortopedika istopatolo ija nederland orthopedie pathologie sterreich orthop die und orthop dische chirurgie orthop die und traumatologie (15) pathologie klinische pathologie und molekularpathologie (15) klinische pathologie und neuropathologie polska ortopedia i traumatologia narz du ruchu patomorfologia portugal ortopedia anatomia patologica rom nia ortopedie i traumatologie anatomie patologic slovenija ortopedska kirurgija; travmatologija patologija slovensko ortop dia patologick anat mia suomi/finland ortopedia ja traumatologia/ortopedi och traumatologi patologia/patologi sverige ortopedi klinisk patologi united kingdom trauma and orthopaedic surgery histopathology neurology psychiatry minimum period of training: 4 years minimum period of training: 4 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien neurologie psychiatrie, particuli rement de l'adulte/psychiatrie, meer bepaald in de volwassenpsychiatrie esk republika neurologie psychiatrie danmark neurologi psykiatri deutschland neurologie psychiatrie und psychotherapie eesti neuroloogia ps hhiaatria espa a neurolog a psiquiatr a france neurologie psychiatrie hrvatska neurologija psihijatrija ireland neurology psychiatry italia neurologia psichiatria latvija neirolo ija psihiatrija lietuva neurologija psichiatrija luxembourg neurologie psychiatrie magyarorsz g neurol gia pszichi tria malta newrolo ija psikjatrija nederland neurologie psychiatrie sterreich neurologie psychiatrie und psychotherapeutische medizin polska neurologia psychiatria portugal neurologia psiquiatria rom nia neurologie psihiatrie slovenija nevrologija psihiatrija slovensko neurol gia psychiatria suomi/finland neurologia/neurologi psykiatria/psykiatri sverige neurologi psykiatri united kingdom neurology general psychiatry diagnostic radiology radiotherapy minimum period of training: 4 years minimum period of training: 4 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien radiodiagnostic/r ntgendiagnose radioth rapie-oncologie/radiotherapie-oncologie ' esk republika radiologie a zobrazovac metody radia n onkologie danmark radiologi klinisk onkologi deutschland (diagnostische) radiologie strahlentherapie eesti radioloogia onkoloogia ' espa a radiodiagn stico oncolog a radioter pica france radiodiagnostic et imagerie m dicale oncologie option oncologie radioth rapique hrvatska klini ka radiologija onkologija i radioterapija ireland radiology radiation oncology italia radiodiagnostica radioterapia latvija diagnostisk radiolo ija terapeitisk radiolo ija lietuva radiologija onkologija radioterapija luxembourg radiodiagnostic radioth rapie magyarorsz g radiol gia sug rter pia malta radjolo ija onkolo ija u radjoterapija nederland radiologie radiotherapie sterreich radiologie strahlentherapie-radioonkologie polska radiologia i diagnostyka obrazowa radioterapia onkologiczna portugal radiodiagn stico radioterapia radioncologia rom nia radiologie-imagistic medical radioterapie slovenija radiologija radioterapija in onkologija slovensko r diol gia radia n onkol gia suomi/finland radiologia/radiologi sy p taudit/cancersjukdomar sverige medicinsk radiologi radiologi (18) tum rsjukdomar (allm n onkologi) onkologi (17) united kingdom clinical radiology clinical oncology plastic surgery clinical biology minimum period of training: 5 years minimum period of training: 4 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien chirurgie plastique, reconstructrice et esth tique/plastische, reconstructieve en esthetische heelkunde biologie clinique/klinische biologie - esk republika plastick chirurgie danmark plastikkirurgi deutschland plastische (und sthetische) chirurgie plastische und sthetische chirurgie (19) laboratoriumsmedizin (20) eesti plastika- ja rekonstruktiivkirurgia laborimeditsiin (23) espa a cirug a pl stica, est tica y reparadora an lisis cl nicos france chirurgie plastique, reconstructrice et esth tique biologie m dicale hrvatska plasti na, rekonstrukcijska i estetska kirurgija ireland plastic, reconstructive and aesthetic surgery italia chirurgia plastica, ricostruttiva ed estetica patologia clinica patologia clinica e biochimica clinica (22) latvija plastisk irur ija lietuva plastin ir rekonstrukcin chirurgija laboratorin medicina luxembourg chirurgie plastique biologie clinique magyarorsz g plasztikai ( g si) seb szet plasztikai s g s-seb szet (24) orvosi laborat riumi diagnosztika malta kirur ija plastika nederland plastische chirurgie sterreich plastische, sthetische und rekonstruktive chirurgie plastische, rekonstruktive und sthetische chirurgie (21) medizinische biologie polska chirurgia plastyczna diagnostyka laboratoryjna portugal cirurgia pl stica, est tica e reconstrutiva patologia cl nica rom nia chirurgie plastic , estetic i microchirurgie reconstructiv medicin de laborator slovenija plasti na, rekonstrukcijska in estetska kirurgija slovensko plastick chirurgia laborat rna medic na suomi/finland plastiikkakirurgia/plastikkirurgi sverige plastikkirurgi united kingdom plastic surgery microbiology bacteriology biological chemistry minimum period of training: 4 years minimum period of training: 4 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien esk republika l ka sk mikrobiologie klinick biochemie danmark klinisk mikrobiologi klinisk biokemi deutschland mikrobiologie (virologie) und infektionsepidemiologie mikrobiologie, virologie und infektionsepidemiologie (27) laboratoriumsmedizin (25) eesti (30) espa a microbiolog a y parasitolog a bioqu mica cl nica france hrvatska klini ka mikrobiologija ireland microbiology chemical pathology italia microbiologia e virologia biochimica clinica (29) latvija mikrobiolo ija lietuva luxembourg microbiologie chimie biologique magyarorsz g orvosi mikrobiol gia malta mikrobijolo ija patolo ija kimika nederland medische microbiologie klinische chemie (26) sterreich hygiene und mikrobiologie klinische mikrobiologie und hygiene (28) klinische mikrobiologie und virologie (28) medizinische und chemische labordiagnostik polska mikrobiologia lekarska portugal rom nia slovenija klini na mikrobiologija medicinska biokemija slovensko klinick mikrobiol gia klinick bioch mia suomi/finland kliininen mikrobiologia/klinisk mikrobiologi kliininen kemia/klinisk kemi sverige klinisk bakteriologi klinisk mikrobiologi (31) klinisk kemi united kingdom medical microbiology and virology chemical pathology immunology thoracic surgery minimum period of training: 4 years minimum period of training: 5 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien chirurgie thoracique/heelkunde op de thorax (32) ' ' esk republika alergologie a klinick imunologie hrudn chirurgie danmark klinisk immunologi thoraxkirurgi deutschland thoraxchirurgie eesti torakaalkirurgia espa a inmunolog a cirug a tor cica cirug a cardiovascular france chirurgie thoracique et cardiovasculaire hrvatska alergologija i klini ka imunologija specijalist kardiotorakalna kirurgija (35) ireland immunology (clinical and laboratory) cardiothoracic surgery italia chirurgia toracica cardiochirurgia latvija imunolo ija torak l irur ija sirds irurgs lietuva kr tin s chirurgija luxembourg immunologie chirurgie thoracique magyarorsz g allergol gia s klinikai immunol gia mellkasseb szet malta immunolo ija kirur ija kardjo-tora ika nederland cardio-thoracale chirurgie sterreich immunologie klinische immunologie (33) thoraxchirurgie polska immunologia kliniczna chirurgia klatki piersiowej portugal cirurgia cardiotor cica rom nia chirurgie toracic slovenija torakalna kirurgija slovensko klinick imunol gia a alergol gia hrudn kov chirurgia suomi/finland syd n-ja rintaelinkirurgia/hj rt- och thoraxkirurgi sverige klinisk immunologi (34) thoraxkirurgi united kingdom immunology cardo-thoracic surgery paediatric surgery vascular surgery minimum period of training: 5 years minimum period of training: 5 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien chirurgie des vaisseaux/bloedvatenheelkunde (36) ' esk republika d tsk chirurgie c vn chirurgie danmark karkirurgi deutschland kinderchirurgie gef chirurgie eesti lastekirurgia kardiovaskulaarkirurgia ' espa a cirug a pedi trica angiolog a y cirug a vascular france chirurgie infantile chirurgie vasculaire hrvatska dje ja kirurgija vaskularna kirurgija ireland paediatric surgery vascular surgery (37) italia chirurgia pediatrica chirurgia vascolare ' latvija b rnu irur ija asinsvadu irur ija lietuva vaik chirurgija kraujagysli chirurgija luxembourg chirurgie p diatrique chirurgie vasculaire magyarorsz g gyermekseb szet rseb szet malta kirurgija pedjatrika kirur ija vaskolari nederland sterreich kinder- und jugendchirurgie allgemeinchirurgie und gef chirurgie polska chirurgia dziecica chirurgia naczyniowa portugal cirurgia pedi trica angologia/cirurgia vascular rom nia chirurgie pediatric chirurgie vascular slovenija kardiovaskularna kirurgija slovensko detsk chirurgia cievna chirurgia suomi/finland lastenkirurgia/barnkirurgi verisuonikirurgia/k rlkirurgi sverige barn- och ungdomskirurgi k rlkirurgi united kingdom paediatric surgery vascular surgery cardiology gastroenterology minimum period of training: 4 years minimum period of training: 4 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien cardiologie gastro-ent rologie/gastro-enterologie ' (38) esk republika kardiologie gastroenterologie danmark intern medicin: kardiologi intern medicin: gastroenterology og hepatologi deutschland innere medizin und schwerpunkt kardiologie innere medizin und kardiologie (39) innere medizin und schwerpunkt gastroenterologie innere medizin und gastroenterologie (39) eesti kardioloogia gastroenteroloogia ' espa a cardiolog a aparato digestivo france cardiologie et maladies vasculaires gastro-ent rologie et h patologie hrvatska kardiologija gastroenterologija ireland cardiology gastro-enterology italia malattie dell'apparato cardiovascolare gastroenterologia malattie dell'apparato digerente (40) ' latvija kardiolo ija gastroenterolo ija lietuva kardiologija gastroenterologija luxembourg cardiologie et angiologie gastro-enterologie magyarorsz g kardiol gia gasztroenterol gia malta kardjolo ija gastroenterolo ija nederland cardiologie maag-darm-leverziekten sterreich innere medizin und kardiologie innere medizin und gastroenterologie und hepatologie polska kardiologia gastrenterologia portugal cardiologia gastrenterologia rom nia cardiologie gastroenterologie slovenija kardiologija in vaskularna medicina gastroenterologija slovensko kardiol gia gastroenterol gia suomi/finland kardiologia/kardiologi gastroenterologia/gastroenterologi sverige kardiologi medicinsk gastroenterologi och hepatologi united kingdom cardiology gastroenterology rheumatology general haematology minimum period of training: 4 years minimum period of training: 3 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien rhumathologie/reumatologie esk republika revmatologie hematologie a transf zn l ka stv danmark intern medicin: reumatologi intern medicin: h matologi deutschland innere medizin und schwerpunkt rheumatologie innere medizin und rheumatologie (41) innere medizin und schwerpunkt h matologie und onkologie innere medizin und h matologie und onkologie (41) eesti reumatoloogia hematoloogia espa a reumatolog a hematolog a y hemoterapia france rhumatologie hrvatska reumatologija hematologija ireland rheumatology haematology (clinical and laboratory) italia reumatologia ematologia latvija reimatolo ija hematolo ija lietuva reumatologija hematologija luxembourg rhumatologie h matologie magyarorsz g reumatol gia hematol gia malta rewmatolo ija ematolo ija nederland reumatologie sterreich innere medizin und rheumatologie innere medizin und h matologie und internistische onkologie polska reumatologia hematologia portugal reumatologia imuno-hemoterapia rom nia reumatologie hematologie slovenija revmatologija hematologija slovensko reumatol gia hematol gia a transf ziol gia suomi/finland reumatologia/reumatologi kliininen hematologia/klinisk hematologi sverige reumatologi hematologi united kingdom rheumatology haematology endocrinology physiotherapy minimum period of training: 3 years minimum period of training: 3 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien m decine physique et r adaptation/fysische geneeskunde en revalidatie ' ' esk republika diabelotologie a endokrinologie rehabilita n a fyzik ln medic na danmark intern medicin: endokrinologi deutschland innere medizin und schwerpunkt endokrinologie und diabetologie innere medizin und endokrinologie und diabetologie (42) physikalische und rehabilitative medizin eesti endokrinoloogia taastusravi ja f siaatria ' espa a endocrinolog a y nutrici n medicina f sica y rehabilitaci n france endocrinologie diab te maladies m taboliques m decine physique et de r adaptation hrvatska endokrinologija i dijabetologija fizikalna medicina i rehabilitacija ireland endocrinology and diabetes mellitus italia endocrinologia e malattie del ricambio endocrinologia e malattie del metabolismo (43) medicina fisica e riabilitazione medicina fisica e riabilitativa (43) ' latvija endokrinolo ija rehabilitolo ija fizisk rehabilit cija fizik l medic na lietuva endokrinologija fizin medicina ir reabilitacija luxembourg endocrinologie, maladies du m tabolisme et de la nutrition r ducation et r adaptation fonctionnelles magyarorsz g endokrinol gia endokrinol gia s anyagcsere-betegs gek (45) fizik lis medicina s rehabilit ci s orvosl s rehabilit ci s medicina (46) malta endokrinolo ija u dijabete nederland revalidatiegeneeskunde sterreich innere medizin und endokrinologie und diabetologie physikalische medizin und allgemeine rehabilitation polska endokrynologia rehabilitacja medyczna portugal endocrinologia/nutri o medicina f sica e de reabilita o rom nia endocrinologie reabilitare medical slovenija fizikalna in rehabilitacijska medicina slovensko endokrinol gia fyziatria, balneol gia a lie ebn rehabilit cia suomi/finland endokrinologia/endokrinologi fysiatria/fysiatri sverige endokrina sjukdomar endokrinologi och diabetologi (44) rehabiliteringsmedicin united kingdom endocrinology and diabetes mellitus neuropsychiatry dermato-venereology minimum period of training: 5 years minimum period of training: 3 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien neuropsychiatrie (47) dermato-v n r ologie/dermato-venereologie esk republika dermatovenerologie danmark dermato-venerologi deutschland nervenheilkunde (neurologie und psychiatrie) haut- und geschlechtskrankheiten eesti dermatoveneroloogia ' espa a dermatolog a m dico-quir rgica y venereolog a france neuropsychiatrie (48) dermatologie et v n r ologie hrvatska dermatologija i venerologija ireland italia neuropsichiatria (49) dermatologia e venereologia ' latvija dermatolo ija un venerolo ija lietuva dermatovenerologija luxembourg neuropsychiatrie (50) dermato-v n r ologie magyarorsz g b rgy gy szat malta dermato-venerejolo ija nederland zenuw- en zielsziekten (51) dermatologie en venerologie sterreich neurologie und psychiatrie (52) haut- und geschlechtskrankheiten polska dermatologia i wenerologia portugal dermatovenereologia rom nia dermatovenerologie slovenija dermatovenerologija slovensko neuropsychiatria dermatovenerol gia suomi/finland ihotaudit ja allergologia/hudsjukdomar och allergologi sverige hud- och k nssjukdomar united kingdom radiology child psychiatry minimum period of training: 4 years minimum period of training: 4 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien psychiatrie, particuli rement en psychiatrie infanto-juv nile/psychiatrie, meer bepaald in de kinder- en jeugdpsychiatrie ' esk republika d tsk a dorostov psychiatrie danmark b rne- og ungdomspsykiatri deutschland radiologie kinder- und jugendpsychiatrie und -psychotherapie eesti ' ' espa a electroradiolog a (53) france electro-radiologie (54) p dopsychiatrie (59) hrvatska klini ka radiologija dje ja i adolescentna psihijatrija ireland child and adolescent psychiatry italia radiologia (55) neuropsichiatria infantile ' latvija b rnu psihiatrija lietuva vaik ir paaugli psichiatrija luxembourg lectroradiologie (56) psychiatrie infantile magyarorsz g radiol gia gyermek- s ifj s gi pszichi tria malta nederland radiologie (57) sterreich radiologie (58) kinder- und jugendpsychiatrie kinder- und jugendpsychiatrie und psychotherapeutische medizin (60) polska psychiatria dzieci i m odzie y portugal radiologia psiquiatria da inf ncia e da adolesc ncia rom nia psihiatrie pediatric slovenija radiologija otro ka in mladostni ka psihiatrija slovensko detsk psychiatria suomi/finland lastenpsykiatria/barnpsykiatri sverige barn- och ungdomspsykiatri united kingdom child and adolescent psychiatry geriatrics renal diseases minimum period of training: 4 years minimum period of training: 4 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien g riatrie/geriatrie ' esk republika geriatrie nefrologie danmark intern medicin: geriatric intern medicin: nefrologi deutschland innere medizin und schwerpunkt nephrologie innere medizin und nephrologie (61) eesti nefroloogia espa a geriatr a nefrolog a france n phrologie hrvatska gerijatrija nefrologija ireland geriatric medicine nephrology italia geriatria nefrologia latvija nefrolo ija lietuva geriatrija nefrologija luxembourg g riatrie n phrologie magyarorsz g geri tria nefrol gia malta erjatrija nefrolo ija nederland klinische geriatrie sterreich innere medizin und nephrologie polska geriatria nefrologia portugal nefrologia rom nia geriatrie i gerontologie nefrologie slovenija nefrologija slovensko geriatria nefrol gia suomi/finland geriatria/geriatri nefrologia/nefrologi sverige geriatrik medicinska njursjukdomar (nefrologi) njurmedicin (62) united kingdom geriatric medicine renal medicine communicable diseases community medicine minimum period of training: 4 years minimum period of training: 4 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien ' ' ' esk republika infek n l ka stv hygiena a epidemiologie danmark intern medicin: infektionsmedicin samfundsmedicin deutschland ffentliches gesundheitswesen eesti infektsioonhaigused espa a medicina preventiva y salud p blica france sant publique et m decine sociale hrvatska infektologija javnozdravstvena medicina ireland infectious diseases public health medicine italia malattie infettive malattie infettive e tropicali (64) igiene e medicina preventiva ' (65) latvija infektolo ija lietuva infektologija luxembourg maladies contagieuses sant publique magyarorsz g infektol gia megel z orvostan s n peg szs gtan malta mard infettiv sa a pubblika nederland maatschappij en gezondheid sterreich innere medizin und infektiologie sozialmedizin public health (63) polska choroby zaka ne zdrowie publiczne, epidemiologia portugal doen as infecciosas sa de p blica rom nia boli infec ioase s n tate public i management slovenija infektologija javno zdravje slovensko infektol gia verejn zdravotn ctvo suomi/finland infektiosairaudet/infektionssjukdomar terveydenhuolto/h lsov rd sverige infektionssjukdomar socialmedicin united kingdom infectious diseases public health medicine pharmacology occupational medicine minimum period of training: 4 years minimum period of training: 4 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien m decine du travail/arbeidsgeneeskunde ' ' esk republika klinick farmakologie pracovn l ka stv danmark klinisk farmakologi arbejdsmedicin deutschland pharmakologie und toxikologie arbeitsmedizin eesti espa a farmacolog a cl nica medicina del trabajo france m decine du travail hrvatska klini ka farmakologija s toksikologijom medicina rada i porta ireland clinical pharmacology and therapeutics pharmaceutical medicine (69) occupational medicine italia farmacologia farmacologia e tossicologia clinica (67) medicina del lavoro latvija arodslim bas lietuva darbo medicina luxembourg m decine du travail magyarorsz g klinikai farmakol gia foglalkoz s-orvostan ( zemorvostan) malta farmakolo ija klinika u t-terapewtika medi ina okkupazzjonali nederland arbeid en gezondheid, bedrijfsgeneeskunde arbeid en gezondheid, verzekeringsgeneeskunde sterreich pharmakologie und toxikologie arbeitsmedizin arbeitsmedizin und angewandte physiologie (66) polska farmakologia kliniczna medycyna pracy portugal medicina do trabalho rom nia farmacologie clinic medicina muncii slovenija medicina dela, prometa in porta slovensko klinick farmakol gia pracovn lek rstvo suomi/finland kliininen farmakologia ja l kehoito/klinisk farmakologi och l kemedelsbehandling ty terveyshuolto/f retagsh lsov rd sverige klinisk farmakologi yrkes- och milj medicin arbets- och milj medicin (68) united kingdom clinical pharmacology and therapeutics occupational medicine allergology nuclear medicine minimum period of training: 3 years minimum period of training: 4 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien m decine nucl aire/nucleaire geneeskunde ' esk republika alergologie a klinick imunologie nukle rn medic na danmark klinisk fysiologi og nuklearmedicin deutschland nuklearmedizin eesti espa a alergolog a medicina nuclear france m decine nucl aire hrvatska alergologija i klini ka imunologija nuklearna medicina ireland italia allergologia ed immunologia clinica medicina nucleare latvija alergolo ija lietuva alergologija ir klinikin imunologija luxembourg m decine nucl aire magyarorsz g allergol gia s klinikai immunol gia nukle ris medicina malta medi ina nukleari nederland allergologie (70) nucleaire geneeskunde sterreich nuklearmedizin polska alergologia medycyna nuklearna portugal imuno-alergologia medicina nuclear rom nia alergologie i imunologie clinic medicin nuclear slovenija nuklearna medicina slovensko klinick imunol gia a alergol gia nukle rna medic na suomi/finland kliininen fysiologia ja isotooppil ketiede/klinisk fysiologi och nukle rmedicin sverige allergisjukdomar nukle rmedicin nuklearmedicin (71) united kingdom nuclear medicine maxillo-facial surgery (basic medical training) biological haematology minimum period of training: 5 years minimum period of training: 4 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien - esk republika maxilofaci ln chirurgie danmark deutschland eesti espa a cirug a oral y maxilofacial france chirurgie maxillo-faciale et stomatologie h matologie hrvatska maksilofacijalna kirurgija ireland italia chirurgia maxillo-facciale latvija mutes, sejas un ok u irur ija lietuva veido ir andikauli chirurgija luxembourg chirurgie maxillo-faciale h matologie biologique magyarorsz g sz jseb szet (72) malta nederland sterreich mund-, kiefer- und gesichtschirurgie (73) polska chirurgia szczekowo-twarzowa portugal cirurgia maxilo-facial hematologia clinica rom nia slovenija maxilofacialna kirurgija slovensko maxilofaci lna chirurgia suomi/finland sverige united kingdom stomatology dermatology minimum period of training: 3 years minimum period of training: 4 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien esk republika danmark deutschland eesti espa a estomatolog a france stomatologie hrvatska ireland dermatology italia odontostomatologia (74) latvija lietuva luxembourg stomatologie magyarorsz g malta dermatolo ija nederland sterreich polska portugal estomatologia rom nia slovenija slovensko suomi/finland sverige united kingdom dermatology venerology tropical medicine minimum period of training: 4 years minimum period of training: 4 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien esk republika danmark deutschland eesti espa a france hrvatska ireland genito-urinary medicine tropical medicine italia medicina tropicale (76) latvija lietuva luxembourg magyarorsz g tr pusi betegs gek malta medi ina uro- enetali nederland sterreich spezifische prophylaxe und tropenmedizin klinische immunologie und spezifische prophylaxe und tropenmedizin (75) polska medycyna transportu portugal medicina tropical rom nia slovenija slovensko tropick medic na suomi/finland sverige united kingdom genito-urinary medicine tropical medicine gastroenterological surgery accident and emergency medicine minimum period of training: 5 years minimum period of training: 5 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien chirurgie abdominale/heelkunde op het abdomen (77) a ' esk republika traumatologie urgentn medic na danmark akutmedicin (81) deutschland visceralchirurgie eesti erakorralise meditsiini eriarst (82) espa a france chirurgie visc rale et digestive hrvatska abdominalna kirurgija hitna medicina ireland emergency medicine italia chirurgia dell'apparato digerente (79) medicina d'emergenza-urgenza (78) latvija lietuva abdominalin chirurgija luxembourg chirurgie gastro-ent rologique magyarorsz g oxyol gia s s rg ss gi orvostan malta medi ina tal-a identi u l-emer enza medi ina tal-emer enza (80) nederland sterreich polska medycyna ratunkowa portugal rom nia medicin de urgen slovenija abdominalna kirurgija urgentna medicina slovensko gastroenterologick chirurgia razov chirurgia urgentn medic na suomi/finland gastroenterologinen kirurgia/gastroenterologisk kirurgi akuuttil ketiede/akutmedicin sverige akutsjukv rd united kingdom emergency medicine clinical neurophysiology dental, oral and maxillo-facial surgery (basic medical and dental training) (83) minimum period of training: 4 years minimum period of training: 4 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien stomatologie et chirurgie orale et maxillo-faciale/stomatologie en mond-, kaak- en aangezichtschirurgie , - esk republika danmark deutschland mund-, kiefer- und gesichtschirurgie mund-kiefer-gesichtschirurgie (84) eesti (85) espa a neurofisiologia cl nica france hrvatska ireland clinical neurophysiology oral and maxillo-facial surgery italia - - latvija lietuva luxembourg chirurgie dentaire, orale et maxillo-faciale magyarorsz g arc- llcsont-sz jseb szet malta newrofi jolo ija klinika kirur ija tal-g adam tal-wi nederland sterreich mund-, kiefer- und gesichtschirurgie polska portugal rom nia chirurgie oral i maxilo-facial (86) slovenija slovensko suomi/finland kliininen neurofysiologia/klinisk neurofysiologi suu- ja leukakirurgia/oral och maxillofacial kirurgi sverige klinisk neurofysiologi united kingdom clinical neurophysiology oral and maxillo-facial surgery medical oncology medical genetics minimum period of training: 5 years minimum period of training: 4 years country title title belgique/belgi /belgien oncologie m dicale/medische oncologie ' ' esk republika klinick onkologie l ka sk genetika danmark klinisk genetik deutschland humangenetik eesti meditsiinigeneetika espa a oncolog a m dica france oncologie g n tique m dicale hrvatska ireland medical oncology clinical genetics italia oncologia medica genetica medica latvija onkolo ija mijterapija medic nas en tika lietuva chemoterapin onkologija genetika luxembourg oncologie m dicale m decine g n tique magyarorsz g klinikai onkol gia klinikai genetika malta enetika klinika/medika nederland klinische genetica sterreich medizinische genetik polska onkologia kliniczna genetyka kliniczna portugal oncologia m dica gen tica m dica rom nia oncologie medical genetic medical slovenija internisti na onkologija klini na genetika slovensko klinick onkol gia lek rska genetica suomi/finland perinn llisyysl ketiede/medicinsk genetik sverige onkologi klinisk genetik united kingdom medical oncology clinical genetics 5.1.4. evidence of formal qualifications of general practitioners country evidence of formal qualifications professional title reference date belgi /belgique/belgien bijzondere beroepstitel van huisarts/titre professionnel particulier de m decin g n raliste huisarts/m decin g n raliste 31.12.1994 ' ' - ' 1.1.2007 esk republika diplom o specializaci v eobecn praktick l ka stv v eobecn praktick l ka 1.5.2004 danmark bevis for tilladelse til at betegne sig som speciall ge i almen medicin alment praktiserende l ge/speciall ge i almen medicin 31.12.1994 deutschland zeugnis ber die spezifische ausbildung in der allgemeinmedizin facharzt/fach rztin f r allgemeinmedizin 31.12.1994 eesti residentuuri l petamist t endav tunnistus diplom peremeditsiini erialal perearst 1.5.2004 ' ' 31.12.1994 espa a t tulo de especialista en medicina familiar y comunitaria especialista en medicina familiar y comunitaria 31.12.1994 france dipl 'mes d' tudes sp cialis es de m decine g n rale accompagn s du dipl 'me d'etat de docteur en m decine m decin qualifi en m decine g n rale 31.12.1994 hrvatska diploma o specijalisti kom usavr avanju specijalist obiteljske medicine 1.7.2013 ireland certificate of specific qualifications in general medical practice general medical practitioner 31.12.1994 italia attestato di formazione specifica in medicina generale diploma di formazione specifica in medicina generale medico di medicina generale 31.12.1994 ' 1.5.2004 latvija imenes rsta sertifik ts imenes (visp r j s prakses) rsts 1.5.2004 lietuva 1. eimos gydytojo rezident ros pa ym jimas eimos medicinos gydytojas 1.5.2004 2. rezident ros pa ym jimas ( eimos gydytojo profesin kvalifikacija) eimos gydytojas luxembourg dipl 'me de formation sp cifique en medicine g n rale m decin g n raliste 31.12.1994 magyarorsz g h ziorvostan szakorvosa bizony tv ny h ziorvostan szakorvosa 1.5.2004 malta ertifikat ta' spe jalista mediku fil-medi ina tal-familja tabib spe jalista fil-medi ina tal-familja 1.5.2004 nederland certificaat van inschrijving in een specialistenregister van huisartsen huisarts, verpleeghuisarts en arts voor verstandelijk gehandicapte registratie commissie (hvrc) 31.12.1994 diploma geneeskundig specialist registratiecommissie geneeskundig specialisten (rgs) van de koninklijke nederlandsche maatschappij tot bevordering der geneeskunst (87) sterreich diplom ber die besondere ausbildung in der allgemeinmedizin arzt f r allgemeinmedizin 31.12.1994 polska dyplom uzyskania tytu u specjalisty w dziedzinie medycyny rodzinnej specjalista w dziedzinie medycyny rodzinnej 1.5.2004 portugal t tulo de especialista em medicina geral e familiar especialista em medicina geral e familiar 31.12.1994 rom nia certificat de medic specialist medicin de familie medic specialist medicin de familie 1.1.2007 slovenija potrdilo o opravljenem specialisti nem izpitu iz dru inske medicine specialist dru inske medicine/specialistka dru inske medicine 1.5.2004 slovensko diplom o pecializ cii v odbore v eobecn lek rstvo v eobecn lek r 1.5.2004 suomi/finland todistus yleisl ketieteen erityiskoulutuksesta/bevis om s rskild allm nl karutbildning yleisl ketieteen erityiskoulutuksen suorittanut laillistettu l k ri/legitimerad l kare som har fullgjort s rskild allm nl karutbildning 1.1.1994 sverige bevis om specialistkompetens i allm nmedicin specialist i allm nmedicin 31.12.1994 united kingdom certificate of completion of training general practitioner 31.12.1994 2. point 5.2.2 is replaced by the following: 5.2.2. evidence of formal qualifications of nurses responsible for general care country evidence of formal qualifications body awarding the evidence of qualifications professional title reference date belgi /belgique/belgien diploma gegradueerde verpleger/verpleegster/dipl 'me d'infirmier( re) gradu (e)/diplom eines (einer) graduierten krankenpflegers (-pflegerin) de erkende opleidingsinstituten/les tablissements d'enseignement reconnus/die anerkannten ausbildungsanstalten hospitalier( re)/verpleegassistent(e) 29.6.1979 de bevoegde examencommissie van de vlaamse gemeenschap/le jury comp tent d'enseignement de la communaut fran aise/der zust ndige pr fungsausschu der deutschsprachigen gemeinschaft infirmier( re) hospitalier( re)/ziekenhuisverpleger(-verpleegster) diploma in de ziekenhuisverpleegkunde/brevet d'infirmier( re) hospitalier( re)/brevet eines (einer) krankenpflegers (-pflegerin) brevet van verpleegassistent(e)/brevet d'hospitalier( re)/brevet einer pflegeassistentin - ' ' 1.1.2007 esk republika 1. diplom o ukon en studia ve studijn m programu o et ovatelstv ve studijn m oboru v eobecn sestra (bakal , bc.) 1. vysok kola z zen nebo uznan st tem v eobecn sestra 1.5.2004 2. diplom o ukon en studia ve studijn m oboru diplomovan v eobecn sestra (diplomovan specialista, dis.), accompanied by the following certificate: vysv d en o absolutoriu 2. vy odborn kola z zen nebo uznan st tem v eobecn o et ovatel danmark bevis for uddannelsen til professionsbachelor i sygepleje professionsh jskole sygeplejerske 29.6.1979 deutschland zeugnis ber die staatliche pr fung in der krankenpflege staatlicher pr fungsausschuss gesundheits- und krankenpflegerin/gesundheits- und krankenpfleger 29.6.1979 eesti 1. diplom e erialal 1. tallinna meditsiinikool de 1.5.2004 tartu meditsiinikool kohtla-j rve meditsiinikool 2. e p hikoolituse diplom 2. tallinna tervishoiu k rgkool 3. e p hi pe diplom 3. tartu tervishoiu k rgkool 1. / 1. , 1.1.1981 2. ' ' ( . ..) 2. ' ' ' 3. 3. 4. ' 4. 5. ' 5. 6. 6. ' 7. 7. espa a t tulo de diplomado universitario en enfermer a ministerio de educaci n y cultura enfermero/a diplomado/a 1.1.1986 el rector de una universidad titulo de graduado/a en enfermer a el rector de una universidad graduado/a en enfermer a 1.1.1986 france dipl 'me d'etat d'infirmier( re) dipl 'me d'etat d'infirmier( re) d livr en vertu du d cret no 99-1147 du 29 d cembre 1999 le minist re de la sant infirmier( re) 29.6.1979 hrvatska 1. svjedod ba medicinska sestra op e njege/medicinski tehni ar op e njege 1. srednje strukovne kole koje izvode program za stjecanje kvalifikacije medicinska sestra op e njege/medicinski tehni ar op e njege 1. medicinska sestra op e njege/medicinski tehni ar op e njege 1.7.2013 2. svjedod ba prvostupnik (baccalaureus) sestrinstva/prvostupnica (baccalaurea) sestrinstva 2. medicinski fakulteti sveu ili ta u republici hrvatskoj 2. prvostupnik (baccalaureus) sestrinstva/prvostupnica (baccalaurea) sestrinstva sveu ili ta u republici hrvatskoj veleu ili ta u republici hrvatskoj ireland 1. certificate of registered general nurse (88) 1. an b rd altranais (the nursing board) [up to 1.10.2012]; b rd altranais agus cn imhseachais na heireann (the nursing and midwifery board of ireland) [from 2.10.2012] registered general nurse (rgn) 29.6.1979 2. b.sc. in nursing studies (general) approved by the nmbi (89) 2. third-level institution delivering the b.sc. in nursing studies approved by the nmbi [as of september 2002] 3. b.sc. in children's and general (integrated) nursing approved by the nmbi (89) 3. third-level institution delivering the b.sc. in children's and general (integrated) nursing approved by the nmbi [as of september 2006] italia 1. diploma di infermiere professionale (91) 1. scuole riconosciute dallo stato (91) 1. infermiere professionale (91) 29.6.1979 2. diploma di laurea in infermieristica (92) 2. universit (92) 2. infermiere (92) 1.5.2004 ( ) bsc in nursing university of nicosia , frederick latvija 1. diploms par m sas kvalifik cijas ieg anu 1. m su skolas m sa 1.5.2004 2. m sas diploms 2. universit tes tipa augstskola pamatojoties uz valsts eks menu komisijas l mumu lietuva 1. auk tojo mokslo diplomas, nurodantis suteikt bendrosios praktikos slaugytojo profesin kvalifikacij 1. universitetas bendrosios praktikos slaugytojas 1.5.2004 2. auk tojo mokslo diplomas (neuniversitetin s studijos), nurodantis suteikt bendrosios praktikos slaugytojo profesin kvalifikacij 2. kolegija 3. bakalauro diplomas (slaugos bakalauro kvalifikacinis laipsnis ir bendrosios praktikos slaugytojo profesin kvalifikacija) 3. universitetas 4. profesinio bakalauro diplomas (slaugos profesinio bakalauro kvalifikacinis laipsnis ir bendrosios praktikos slaugytojo profesin kvalifikacija) 4. kolegija luxembourg dipl 'me d'etat d'infirmier minist re de l' ducation nationale, de la formation professionnelle et des sports infirmier 29.6.1979 dipl 'me d'etat d'infirmier hospitalier gradu magyarorsz g 1. pol bizony tv ny 1. szakk pz iskola pol 1.5.2004 2. pol oklev l 2. fels oktat si int zm ny 3. okleveles pol oklev l 3. fels oktat si int zm ny malta lawrja jew diploma fl-istudji tal-infermerija universita ta' malta infermier registrat tal-ewwel livell 1.5.2004 nederland 1. diploma's verpleger a, verpleegster a, verpleegkundige a 1. door een van overheidswege benoemde examencommissie verpleegkundige 29.6.1979 2. diploma verpleegkundige mbov (middelbare beroepsopleiding verpleegkundige) 2. door een van overheidswege benoemde examencommissie 3. diploma verpleegkundige hbov (hogere beroepsopleiding verpleegkundige) 3. door een van overheidswege benoemde examencommissie 4. diploma beroepsonderwijs verpleegkundige kwalificatieniveau 4 4. door een van overheidswege aangewezen opleidingsinstelling 5. diploma hogere beroepsopleiding verpleegkundige kwalificatieniveau 5 5. door een van overheidswege aangewezen opleidingsinstelling sterreich 1. diplom ber die ausbildung in der all-gemeinen gesundheits- und krankenpflege 1. schule f r allgemeine gesundheits- und krankenpflege diplomierte gesundheits- und krankenschwester 1.1.1994 2. diplom als diplomierte krankenschwester, diplomierter krankenpfleger 2. allgemeine krankenpflegeschule diplomierter gesundheits- und krankenpfleger 3. diplom ber den abschluss des fachhochschul-bachelorstudiengangs gesundheits- und krankenpflege 3. fachhochschulrat/fachhochschule polska dyplom uko czenia studi w wy szych na kierunku pielgniarstwo z tytu em magister pielgniarstwa instytucja prowadz ca kszta cenie na poziomie wy szym uznana przez w a ciwe w adze pielegniarka 1.5.2004 dyplom uko czenia studi w wy szych zawodowych na kierunku/specjalno ci pielgniarstwo z tytu em licencjat pielgniarstwa portugal 1. diploma do curso de enfermagem geral 1. escolas de enfermagem enfermeiro 1.1.1986 2. diploma/carta de curso de bacharelato em enfermagem 2. escolas superiores de enfermagem 3. diploma/carta de curso de licenciatura em enfermagem 3. escolas superiores de enfermagem; escolas superiores de sa de rom nia 1. diplom de absolvire de asistent medical generalist cu studii superioare de scurt durat 1. universit i asistent medical generalist 1.1.2007 2. diplom de licen de asistent medical generalist cu studii superioare de lung durat 2. universit i 3. certificat de competen e profesionale (de asistent medical generalist) 3. ministerul educa iei na ionale 4. certificat de calificare nivel 5 5. certificat de calificare profesional nivel 5 slovenija diploma, s katero se podeljuje strokovni naslov diplomirana medicinska sestra/diplomirani zdravstvenik 1. univerza diplomirana medicinska sestra/diplomirani zdravstvenik 1.5.2004 2. visoka strokovna ola slovensko 1. diplom o etrovate stvo magister (mgr.) 1. vysok kola/univerzita sestra 1.5.2004 2. diplom o etrovate stvo bakal r (bc.) 2. vysok kola/univerzita 3. diplom diplomovan v eobecn sestra 3. stredn zdravotn cka kola suomi/finland 1. sairaanhoitajan tutkinto/sjuksk tarexamen 1. terveydenhuolto-oppilaitokset/ sairaanhoitaja/sjuksk tare 1.1.1994 h lsov rdsl roanstalter 2. sosiaali- ja terveysalan ammattikorkeakoulututkinto, sairaanhoitaja (amk)/yrkesh gskoleexamen inom h lsov rd och det sociala omr det, sjuksk tare (yh) 2. ammattikorkeakoulut/yrkesh gskolor sverige sjuksk terskeexamen universitet eller h gskola sjuksk terska 1.1.1994 united kingdom a qualification approved by the nursing and midwifery council or one of its predecessor bodies as attesting to the completion of training required for general nurses by article 31 and the standard of proficiency as required for registration as a registered nurse adult in its register (90) education institutions approved by the nursing and midwifery council or one of its predecessor bodies registered nurse adult 29.6.1979 3. points 5.3.2 and 5.3.3 are replaced by the following: 5.3.2. evidence of basic formal qualifications of dental practitioners country evidence of formal qualifications body awarding the evidence of qualifications certificate accompanying the evidence of qualifications professional title reference date belgi /belgique/belgien diploma van tandarts/dipl 'me licenci en science dentaire de universiteiten/les universit s licentiaat in de tandheelkunde/licenci en science dentaire 28.1.1980 de bevoegde examencommissie van de vlaamse gemeenschap/le jury comp tent d'enseignement de la communaut fran aise - ' - ' ' ' ' 1.1.2007 esk republika diplom o ukon en studia ve studijn m programu zubn l ka stv (doktor zubn ho l ka stv , mddr.) l ka sk fakulta univerzity v esk republice zubn l ka 1.5.2004 danmark bevis for kandidatuddannelsen i odontologi (cand.odont.) universitet 1. autorisation som tandl ge 2. tilladelse til selvst ndigt virke som tandl ge tandl ge 28.1.1980 deutschland zeugnis ber die zahn rztliche pr fung zust ndige beh rden zahnarzt 28.1.1980 eesti hambaarstikraad degree in dentistry (dd) diplom hambaarstiteaduse ppekava l bimise kohta tartu likool hambaarst 1.5.2004 ' ' ' 1.1.1981 espa a t tulo de licenciado en odontolog a el rector de una universidad licenciado en odontolog a 1.1.1986 t tulo de graduado/a en odontolog a el rector de una universidad graduado/a en odontolog a 1.1.1986 france dipl 'me d'etat de docteur en chirurgie dentaire universit s chirurgien-dentiste 28.1.1980 hrvatska diploma doktor dentalne medicine/doktorica dentalne medicine fakulteti sveu ili ta u republici hrvatskoj doktor dentalne medicine/doktorica dentalne medicine 1.7.2013 ireland bachelor in dental science (b.dent.sc.) universities dentist 28.1.1980 bachelor of dental surgery (bds) royal college of surgeons in ireland dental practitioner licentiate in dental surgery (lds) dental surgeon italia diploma di laurea in odontoiatria e protesi dentaria universit diploma di abilitazione all'esercizio della professione di odontoiatra odontoiatra 28.1.1980 ' ' ' 1.5.2004 latvija zob rsta diploms universit tes tipa augstskola sertifik ts kompetentas iest des izsniegts dokuments, kas apliecina, ka persona ir nok rtojusi sertifik cijas eks menu zob rstniec b zob rsts 1.5.2004 lietuva 1. auk tojo mokslo diplomas, nurodantis suteikt gydytojo odontologo kvalifikacij universitetas 1. internat ros pa ym jimas, nurodantis suteikt gydytojo odontologo profesin kvalifikacij gydytojas odontologas 1.5.2004 2. magistro diplomas (odontologijos magistro kvalifikacinis laipsnis ir gydytojo odontologo kvalifikacija) 2. internat ros pa ym jimas (gydytojo odontologo profesin kvalifikacija) luxembourg dipl 'me d'etat de docteur en m decine dentaire jury d'examen d'etat m decin-dentiste 28.1.1980 magyarorsz g okleveles fogorvos doktor oklev l (doctor medicinae dentariae, dr. med. dent) egyetem fogorvos 1.5.2004 malta lawrja fil- kirur ija dentali universita' ta malta kirurgu dentali 1.5.2004 nederland universitair getuigschrift van een met goed gevolg afgelegd tandartsexamen faculteit tandheelkunde tandarts 28.1.1980 sterreich bescheid ber die verleihung des akademischen grades doktor der zahnheilkunde medizinische universit t zahnarzt 1.1.1994 medizinische fakult t der universit t polska dyplom uko czenia studi w wy szych na kierunku lekarsko-dentystycznym lekarskim z tytu em lekarz dentysta szko y wy sze wiadectwo z o enia lekarsko dentystycznego egzaminu pa stwowego (93)/ wiadectwo z o enia lekarsko-dentystycznego egzaminu ko cowego (94) lekarz dentysta 1.5.2004 za wiadczenie o uko czeniu sta u podyplomowego (95) portugal carta de curso de licenciatura em medicina dent ria faculdades institutos superiores m dico dentista 1.1.1986 mestrado integrado em medicina dent ria 24.3.2006 rom nia diplom de licen de medic dentist universit i medic dentist 1.10.2003 diploma de licen i master (96) ministerul educa iei na ionale (96) doctor-medic stomatolog (97) slovenija diploma, s katero se podeljuje strokovni naslov doktor dentalne medicine/doktorica dentalne medicine univerza potrdilo o opravljenem strokovnem izpitu za poklic doktor dentalne medicine/doktorica dentalne medicine doktor dentalne medicine/doktorica dentalne medicine 1.5.2004 slovensko diplom zubn lek rstvo doktor zubn ho lek rstva (mddr.) univerzita zubn lek r 1.5.2004 suomi/finland hammasl ketieteen lisensiaatin tutkinto/odontologie licentiatexamen helsingin yliopisto/helsingfors universitet sosiaali- ja terveysalan lupa- ja valvontaviraston p t s k yt nn n palvelun hyv ksymisest /beslut av tillst nds- och tillsynsverket f r social- och h lsov rden om godk nnande av prakisk tj nstg ring hammasl k ri/tandl kare 1.1.1994 oulun yliopisto it -suomen yliopisto turun yliopisto sverige tandl karexamen universitet eller h gskola bevis om legitimation som tandl kare, utf rdat av socialstyrelsen tandl kare 1.1.1994 united kingdom bachelor of dental surgery (bds or b.ch.d.) universities dentist 28.1.1980 licentiate in dental surgery royal colleges dental practitioner dental surgeon 5.3.3. evidence of formal qualifications of specialised dentists oral surgery country evidence of formal qualifications body awarding the evidence of qualifications reference date belgi /belgique/belgien ' ' ' ' 1.1.2007 esk republika diplom o specializaci (v oboru or ln a maxilofaci ln chirurgie) 1. institut postgradu ln ho vzd l v n ve zdravotnictv 2. ministerstvo zdravotnictv 19.7.2007 danmark bevis for tilladelse til at betegne sig som specialtandl ge i tand-, mund- og k bekirurgi sundhedsstyrelsen styrelsen for patientsikkerhed 28.1.1980 deutschland fachzahn rztliche anerkennung f r oralchirurgie/mundchirurgie landeszahn rztekammer 28.1.1980 eesti ' ' (up to 31.12.2002) ' 1.1.2003 espa a france dipl 'me d' tudes sp cialis es de chirurgie orale universit s 31.03.2011 hrvatska ireland certificate of specialist dentist in oral surgery competent authority recognised for this purpose by the competent minister 28.1.1980 italia diploma di specialista in chirurgia orale universit 21.5.2005 ' ' ' 1.5.2004 latvija lietuva 1. rezident ros pa ym jimas, nurodantis suteikt burnos chirurgo profesin kvalifikacij 2. rezident ros pa ym jimas (burnos chirurgo profesin kvalifikacija) universitetas 1.5.2004 luxembourg magyarorsz g dento-alveol ris seb szet szakorvosa bizony tv ny nemzeti vizsgabizotts g 1.5.2004 malta ertifikat ta' spe jalista dentali fil-kirur ija tal- alq kumitat ta' approvazzjoni dwar spe jalisti 1.5.2004 nederland bewijs van inschrijving als kaakchirurg in het specialistenregister registratiecommissie tandheelkundige specialismen (rts) van de koninklijke nederlandse maatschappij tot bevordering der tandheelkunde 28.1.1980 sterreich polska dyplom uzyskania tytu u specjalisty w dziedzinie chirurgii stomatologicznej centrum egzamin w medycznych 1.5.2004 portugal t tulo de especialista em cirurgia oral ordem dos m dicos dentistas (omd) 4.6.2008 rom nia certificatul de specialist n chirurgie dento-alveolar ministerul s n t ii 17.12.2008 slovenija potrdilo o opravljenem specialisti nem izpitu iz oralne kirurgije 1. ministrstvo za zdravje 2. zdravni ka zbornica slovenije 1.5.2004 slovensko diplom o pecializ cii v pecializa nom odbore maxilofaci lna chirurgia univerzita 17.12.2008 suomi/finland erikoishammasl k rin tutkinto, suu-ja leukakirurgia/specialtandl karexamen, oral och maxillofacial kirurgi yliopisto 1.1.1994 sverige bevis om specialistkompetens i oral kirurgi socialstyrelsen 1.1.1994 united kingdom certificate of completion of specialist training in oral surgery competent authority recognised for this purpose 28.1.1980 orthodontics country evidence of formal qualifications body awarding the evidence of qualifications reference date belgi /belgique/belgien titre professionnel particulier de dentiste sp cialiste en orthodontie/bijzondere beroepstitel van tandarts specialist in de orthodontie ministre de la sant publique/minister bevoegd voor volksgezondheid 27.1.2005 ' ' ' ' ' 1.1.2007 esk republika diplom o specializaci (v oboru ortodoncie) 1. institut postgradu ln ho vzd l v n ve zdravotnictv 2. ministerstvo zdravotnictv 19.7.2007 danmark bevis for tilladelse til at betegne sig som specialtandl ge i ortodonti sundhedsstyrelsen styrelsen for patientsikkerhed 28.1.1980 deutschland fachzahn rztliche anerkennung f r kieferorthop die landeszahn rztekammer 28.1.1980 eesti residentuuri l putunnistus ortodontia erialal ortodontia residentuuri l petamist t endav tunnistus tartu likool 1.5.2004 ' ' ' ' 1.1.1981 espa a france titre de sp cialiste en orthodontie conseil national de l'ordre des chirurgiens dentistes 28.1.1980 hrvatska ireland certificate of specialist dentist in orthodontics competent authority recognised for this purpose by the competent minister 28.1.1980 italia diploma di specialista in ortognatodonzia universit 21.5.2005 ' ' ' ' 1.5.2004 latvija sertifik ts kompetentas iest des izsniegts dokuments, kas apliecina, ka persona ir nok rtojusi sertifik cijas eks menu ortodontij latvijas rstu biedr ba 1.5.2004 lietuva 1. rezident ros pa ym jimas, nurodantis suteikt gydytojo ortodonto profesin kvalifikacij 2. rezident ros pa ym jimas (gydytojo ortodonto profesin kvalifikacija) universitetas 1.5.2004 luxembourg magyarorsz g fogszab lyoz s szakorvosa bizony tv ny nemzeti vizsgabizotts g 1.5.2004 malta ertifikat ta' spe jalista dentali fl-ortodonzja kumitat ta' approvazzjoni dwar spe jalisti 1.5.2004 nederland bewijs van inschrijving als orthodontist in het specialistenregister registratiecommissie tandheelkundige specialismen (rts) van de koninklijke nederlandse maatschappij tot bevordering der tandheelkunde 28.1.1980 sterreich polska dyplom uzyskania tytu u specjalisty w dziedzinie ortodoncji centrum egzamin w medycznych 1.5.2004 portugal t tulo de especialista em ortodontia ordem dos m dicos dentistas (omd) 4.6.2008 rom nia certificatul de specialist n ortodon ie i ortopedie dento-facial ministerul s n t ii 17.12.2008 slovenija potrdilo o opravljenem specialisti nem izpitu iz eljustne in zobne ortopedije 1. ministrstvo za zdravje 2. zdravni ka zbornica slovenije 1.5.2004 slovensko diplom o pecializ cii v pecializa nom odbore e ustn ortop dia univerzita 17.12.2008 suomi/finland erikoishammasl k rin tutkinto, hampaiston oikomishoito/specialtand-l karexamen, tandreglering yliopisto 1.1.1994 sverige bevis om specialistkompetens i ortodonti socialstyrelsen 1.1.1994 united kingdom certificate of completion of specialist training in orthodontics competent authority recognised for this purpose 28.1.1980. 4. point 5.4.2 is replaced by the following: 5.4.2. evidence of formal qualifications of veterinary surgeons country evidence of formal qualifications body awarding the evidence of qualifications certificate accompanying the evidence of qualifications reference date belgi /belgique/belgien diploma van dierenarts/dipl 'me de docteur en m decine v t rinaire de universiteiten/les universit s de bevoegde examencommissie van de vlaamse gemeenschap/le jury comp tent d'enseignement de la communaut fran aise 21.12.1980 - ' 1.1.2007 ' , ' esk republika diplom o ukon en studia ve studijn m programu veterin rn l ka stv (doktor veterin rn medic ny, mvdr.) diplom o ukon en studia ve studijn m programu veterin rn hygiena a ekologie (doktor veterin rn medic ny, mvdr.) veterin rn fakulta univerzity v esk republice 1.5.2004 danmark bevis for kandidatuddannelsen i veterin rmedicin (cand.med.vet.) k benhavns universitet 21.12.1980 deutschland zeugnis ber das ergebnis des dritten abschnitts der tier rztlichen pr fung und das gesamtergebnis der tier rztlichen pr fung der vorsitzende des pr fungsausschusses f r die tier rztliche pr fung einer universit t oder hochschule 21.12.1980 zeugnis ber das ergebnis der tier rztlichen pr fung und das gesamtergebnis der tier rztlichen pr fung 1.1.2006 eesti diplom: t itnud veterinaarmeditsiini ppekava eesti p llumajandus likool 1.5.2004 loomaarstikraad degree in veterinary medicine (dvm) eesti maa likool 1. 2. 1.1.1981 espa a t tulo de licenciado en veterinaria ministerio de educaci n y cultura 1.1.1986 el rector de una universidad t tulo de graduado/a en veterinaria el rector de una universidad 1.1.1986 france dipl 'me d'etat de docteur v t rinaire l'institut d'enseignement sup rieur et de recherche en alimentation, sant animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement (vet agro sup); l'ecole nationale v t rinaire, agroalimentaire et de l'alimentation, nantes-atlantique (oniris); l'ecole nationale v t rinaire d'alfort; l'ecole nationale v t rinaire de toulouse. 21.12.1980 hrvatska diploma doktor veterinarske medicine/doktorica veterinarske medicine veterinarski fakultet sveu ili ta u zagrebu 1.7.2013 ireland diploma of bachelor in/of veterinary medicine (mvb) diploma of membership of the royal college of veterinary surgeons (mrcvs) 21.12.1980 italia diploma di laurea in medicina veterinaria universit diploma di abilitazione all'esercizio della medicina veterinaria 1.1.1985 1.5.2004 latvija veterin r rsta diploms latvijas lauksaimniec bas universit te 1.5.2004 lietuva 1. auk tojo mokslo diplomas (veterinarijos gydytojo (dvm)) 1. lietuvos veterinarijos akademija 1.5.2004 2. magistro diplomas (veterinarin s medicinos magistro kvalifikacinis laipsnis ir veterinarijos gydytojo profesin kvalifikacija) 2. lietuvos sveikatos moksl universitetas luxembourg dipl 'me d'etat de docteur en m decine v t rinaire jury d'examen d'etat 21.12.1980 magyarorsz g okleveles llatorvos doktor oklev l (dr. vet) fels oktat si int zm ny 1.5.2004 malta li enzja ta' kirurgu veterinarju kunsill tal-kirur i veterinarji 1.5.2004 nederland getuigschrift van met goed gevolg afgelegd diergeneeskundig/veeartsenijkundig examen 21.12.1980 sterreich diplom-tierarzt magister medicinae veterinariae universit t 1.1.1994 polska dyplom lekarza weterynarii 1. szko a g wna gospodarstwa wiejskiego w warszawie 1.5.2004 2. akademia rolnicza we wroc awiu (98) 3. uniwersytet przyrodniczy we wroc awiu (99) 4. akademia rolnicza w lublinie (100) 5. uniwersytet przyrodniczy w lublinie (101) 6. uniwersytet warmi sko-mazurski w olsztynie 7. uniwersytet przyrodniczy w poznaniu (103) 8. uniwersytet rolniczy im. hugona ko taja w krakowie oraz uniwersytet jagiello ski w krakowie (104) portugal carta de curso de licenciatura em medicina veterin ria carta de mestrado integrado em medicina veterin ria universidade 1.1.1986 rom nia diplom de licen de doctor medic veterinar diplom de licen i master de doctor medic veterinar universit i ministerul educatiei nationale (102) 1.1.2007 slovenija diploma, s katero se podeljuje strokovni naslov doktor veterinarske medicine/doktorica veterinarske medicine univerza spri evalo o opravljenem dr avnem izpitu s podro ja veterinarstva 1.5.2004 slovensko vysoko kolsk diplom o udelen akademick ho titulu doktor veterin rskeho lek rstva (mvdr.) univerzita 1.5.2004 suomi/finland el inl ketieteen lisensiaatin tutkinto/veterin rmedicine licentiatexamen yliopisto 1.1.1994 sverige veterin rexamen sveriges lantbruksuniversitet 1.1.1994 united kingdom 1. bachelor of veterinary science (bvsc) 1. university of bristol 21.12.1980 2. bachelor of veterinary science (bvsc) 2. university of liverpool 3. bachelor of veterinary medicine (vet mb) 3. university of cambridge 4. bachelor of veterinary medicine and surgery (bvm&s) 4. university of edinburgh 5. bachelor of veterinary medicine and surgery (bvms) 5. university of glasgow 6. bachelor of veterinary medicine (bvetmed) 6. university of london 7. bachelor of veterinary medicine and bachelor of veterinary surgery (b.v.m., b.v.s.) 7. university of nottingham 5. point 5.5.2 is replaced by the following: 5.5.2 evidence of formal qualifications of midwives country evidence of formal qualifications body awarding the evidence of qualifications professional title reference date belgi /belgique/belgien diploma van vroedvrouw/dipl 'me d'accoucheuse de erkende opleidingsinstituten/les tablissements d'enseignement de bevoegde examencommissie van de vlaamse gemeenschap/le jury comp tent d'enseignement de la communaut fran aise vroedvrouw/ accoucheuse 23.1.1983 - a 1.1.2007 esk republika 1. diplom o ukon en studia ve studijn m programu o et ovatelstv ve studijn m oboru porodn asistentka (bakal , bc.) 1. vysok kola z zen nebo uznan st tem porodn asistentka/porodn asistent 1.5.2004 2. diplom o ukon en studia ve studijn m programu porodn asistence ve studijn m oboru porodn asistentka (bakal , bc.) 2. vysok kola z zen nebo uznan st tem 3. diplom o ukon en studia ve studijn m oboru diplomovan porodn asistentka (diplomovan specialista, dis.) 3. vy odborn kola z zen nebo uznan st tem danmark bevis for uddannelsen til professionsbachelor i jordemoderkundskab professionsh jskole jordemoder 23.1.1983 deutschland zeugnis ber die staatliche pr fung f r hebammen und entbindungspfleger staatlicher pr fungsausschuss hebamme entbindungspfleger 23.1.1983 eesti diplom mmaemanda erialal tallinna meditsiinikool mmaemand 1.5.2004 tartu meditsiinikool mmaemanda diplom tallinna tervishoiu k rgkool tartu tervishoiu k rgkool 1. ' ' ( . ..) 1. ' ' ( . ..) 23.1.1983 2. . ( ) 2. ' 3. 3. espa a t tulo de matrona ministerio de educaci n y cultura matrona 1.1.1986 t tulo de asistente obst trico (matrona) asistente obst trico t tulo de enfermer a obst trica-ginecol gica france dipl 'me de sage-femme l'etat sage-femme 23.1.1983 hrvatska svjedod ba prvostupnik (baccalaureus) primaljstva/sveu ili na prvostupnica (baccalaurea) primaljstva medicinski fakulteti sveu ili ta u republici hrvatskoj prvostupnik (baccalaureus) primaljstva/prvostupnica (baccalaurea) primaljstva 1.7.2013 sveu ili ta u republici hrvatskoj veleu ili ta i visoke kole u republici hrvatskoj ireland 1. certificate in midwifery (105) 1. an b rd altranais (the nursing board) [up to 1.10.2012]; b rd altranais agus cn imhseachais na heireann (the nursing and midwifery board of ireland, nmbi) [from 2.10.2012]. registered midwife (rm) 23.1.1983 2. b.sc. in midwifery approved by the nmbi (106) 2. a third-level institution delivering a midwifery education programme approved by the nmbi 3. higher/post-graduate diploma in midwifery approved by the nmbi (106) 3. third-level institution delivering higher/post-graduate diploma in midwifery approved by the nmbi italia 1. diploma d'ostetrica (108) 1. scuole riconosciute dallo stato (108) ostetrica (108) 23.1.1983 2. laurea in ostetricia (109) 2. universit (109) 1.5.2004 latvija diploms par vecm tes kvalifik cijas ieg anu m su skolas vecm te 1.5.2004 lietuva 1. auk tojo mokslo diplomas, nurodantis suteikt bendrosios praktikos slaugytojo profesin kvalifikacij , ir profesin s kvalifikacijos pa ym jimas, nurodantis suteikt aku erio profesin kvalifikacij 1. universitetas aku eris 1.5.2004 pa ym jimas, liudijantis aku erio profesin praktik 2. auk tojo mokslo diplomas (neuniversitetin s studijos), nurodantis suteikt bendrosios praktikos slaugytojo profesin kvalifikacij , ir profesin s kvalifikacijos pa ym jimas, nurodantis suteikt aku erio profesin kvalifikacij 2. kolegija pa ym jimas, liudijantis aku erio profesin praktik 3. auk tojo mokslo diplomas (neuniversitetin s studijos), nurodantis suteikt aku erio profesin kvalifikacij 3. kolegija 4. bakalauro diplomas (slaugos bakalauro kvalifikacinis laipsnis ir bendrosios praktikos slaugytojo profesin kvalifikacija) ir profesin s kvalifikacijos pa ym jimas (aku erio profesin kvalifikacija) 4. universitetas 5. profesinio bakalauro diplomas (slaugos profesinio bakalauro kvalifikacinis laipsnis ir bendrosios praktikos slaugytojo profesin kvalifikacija) ir profesin s kvalifikacijos pa ym jimas (aku erio profesin kvalifikacija) 5. kolegija 6. profesinio bakalauro diplomas (aku erijos profesinio bakalauro kvalifikacinis laipsnis ir aku erio profesin kvalifikacija) 6. kolegija luxembourg dipl 'me de sage-femme minist re de l' ducation nationale, de la formation professionnelle et des sports sage-femme 23.1.1983 magyarorsz g 1. sz l szn bizony tv ny 1. iskola/f iskola sz l szn 1.5.2004 2. sz l szn oklev l 2. fels oktat si int zm ny malta lawrja jew diploma fl- istudji tal-qwiebel universita' ta' malta qabla 1.5.2004 nederland diploma van verloskundige door het ministerie van volksgezondheid, welzijn en sport erkende opleidings-instellingen verloskundige 23.1.1983 sterreich 1. hebammen-diplom 1. hebammenakademie bundeshebammenlehranstalt hebamme 1.1.1994 2. diplom ber den abschluss des fachhochschul-bachelorstudiengangs hebamme 2. fachhochschulrat polska dyplom uko czenia studi w wy szych na kierunku po o nictwo z tytu em magister po o nictwa dyplom uko czenia studi w wy szych zawodowych na kierunku/specjalno ci po o nictwo z tytu em licencjat po o nictwa instytucja prowadz ca kszta cenie na poziomie wy szym uznana przez w a ciwe w adze (higher education institution recognised by the competent authorities) po o na 1.5.2004 portugal 1. diploma de enfermeiro especialista em enfermagem de sa de materna e obst trica 1. ecolas de enfermagem enfermeiro especialista em enfermagem de sa de materna e obst trica 1.1.1986 2. diploma/carta de curso de estudos superiores especializados em enfermagem de sa de materna e obst trica 2. escolas superiores de enfermagem 3. diploma (do curso de p s-licenciatura) de especializa o em enfermagem de sa de materna e obst trica 3. escolas superiores de enfermagem escolas superiores de sa de rom nia diplom de licen de moa universit i moa 1.1.2007 slovenija diploma, s katero se podeljuje strokovni naslov diplomirana babica/diplomirani babi ar 1. univerza 2. visoka strokovna ola diplomirana babica/diplomirani babi ar 1.5.2004 slovensko 1. diplom p 'rodn asistencia bakal r (bc.) 1. vysok kola/univerzita p 'rodn asistentka 1.5.2004 2. diplom diplomovan p 'rodn asistentka 2. stredn zdravotn cka kola suomi/finland 1. k til n tutkinto/barnmorskeexamen 1. terveydenhuoltooppi-laitokset/h lsov rdsl roanstalter k til /barnmorska 1.1.1994 2. sosiaali- ja terveysalan ammattikorkeakoulututkinto, k til (amk)/yrkesh gskoleexamen inom h lsov rd och det sociala omr det, barnmorska (yh) 2. ammattikorkeakoulut/yrkesh gskolor sverige barnmorskeexamen universitet eller h gskola barnmorska 1.1.1994 united kingdom a qualification approved by the nursing and midwifery council or its predecessor bodies as attesting to the completion of training as required for midwives by article 40 and the standard of proficiency as required for registration as a registered midwife in its register (107) education institution approved by the nursing and midwifery council or its predecessor bodies registered midwife 23.1.1983 6. point 5.6.2 is replaced by the following: 5.6.2. evidence of formal qualifications of pharmacists country evidence of formal qualifications body awarding the evidence of qualifications certificate accompanying the evidence of qualifications reference date belgi /belgique/belgien diploma van apotheker/dipl 'me de pharmacien de universiteiten/les universities de bevoegde examencommissie van de vlaamse gemeenschap/le jury comp tent d'enseignement de la communaut fran aise 1.10.1987 - - 1.1.2007 esk republika diplom o ukon en studia ve studijn m programu farmacie (magistr, mgr.) farmaceutick fakulta univerzity v esk republice 1.5.2004 danmark bevis for kandidatuddannelsen i farmaci (cand.pharm.) det farmaceutiske fakultet, k benhavns universitet 1.10.1987 bevis for kandidatuddannelsen i farmaci (cand.pharm.) syddansk universitet deutschland zeugnis ber die staatliche pharmazeutische pr fung zust ndige beh rden 1.10.1987 eesti diplom proviisori ppekava l bimisest farmaatsiamagister master of science in pharmacy (msc) tartu likool 1.5.2004 ' ' 1.10.1987 espa a t tulo de licenciado en farmacia ministerio de educaci n y cultura 1.10.1987 el rector de una universidad t tulo de graduado/a en farmacia el rector de una universidad 1.1.1986 france dipl 'me d'etat de pharmacien dipl 'me d'etat de docteur en pharmacie universit s 1.10.1987 hrvatska diploma magistar farmacije/magistra farmacije farmaceutsko-biokemijski fakultet sveu ili ta u zagrebu medicinski fakultet sveu ili ta u splitu kemijsko-tehnolo ki fakultet sveu ili ta u splitu 1.7.2013 ireland 1. certificate of registered pharmaceutical chemist (110) certificate of registration as a pharmacist (110) 1. cumann c gaiseoir na heireann (pharmaceutical society of ireland) 1.10.1987 2. a degree in pharmacy recognised by the pharmaceutical society of ireland (111) 2. universities delivering degrees in pharmacy recognised by the pharmaceutical society of ireland 2. notification from the pharmaceutical society of ireland that the person named therein is the holder of a qualification appropriate for practicing as a pharmacist italia diploma o certificato di abilitazione all'esercizio della professione di farmacista ottenuto in seguito ad un esame di stato universit 1.11.1993 1.5.2004 latvija farmaceita diploms universit tes tipa augstskola 1.5.2004 lietuva 1. auk tojo mokslo diplomas, nurodantis suteikt vaistininko profesin kvalifikacij 2. magistro diplomas (farmacijos magistro kvalifikacinis laipsnis ir vaistininko profesin kvalifikacija) universitetas 1.5.2004 luxembourg dipl 'me d'etat de pharmacien jury d'examen d'etat + visa du ministre de l' ducation nationale 1.10.1987 magyarorsz g okleveles gy gyszer sz oklev l (magister pharmaciae, abbrev: mag. pharm) egyetem 1.5.2004 malta lawrja fil-farma ija universita' ta' malta 1.5.2004 nederland getuigschrift van met goed gevolg afgelegd apothekersexamen faculteit farmacie 1.10.1987 sterreich staatliches apothekerdiplom sterreichische apothekerkammer 1.10.1994 polska dyplom uko czenia studi w wy szych na kierunku farmacja z tytu em magistra 1. akademia medyczna 2. uniwersytet medyczny 3. collegium medicum uniwersytetu jagiello skiego 1.5.2004 portugal 1 licenciatura em farm cia 2 carta de curso de licenciatura em ci ncias farmac uticas institui o de ensino superior universit rio 1.10.1987 3 mestrado integrado em ci ncias farmac uticas 1.1.2007 rom nia diplom de licen de farmacist diploma de licen i master (114) universit i ministerul educa iei nationale 1.1.2007 slovenija diploma, s katero se podeljuje strokovni naziv magister farmacije/magistra farmacije univerza potrdilo o opravljenem strokovnem izpitu za poklic magister farmacije/magistra farmacije 1.5.2004 slovensko diplom farm cia magister (mgr.) univerzita 1.5.2004 suomi/finland proviisorin tutkinto/provisorexamen yliopisto 1.10.1994 sverige apotekarexamen universitet och h gskolor 1.10.1994 united kingdom 1. certificate of registered pharmacist (112) 1.10.1987 2. a degree in pharmacy approved by either the general pharmaceutical council (formerly royal pharmaceutical society of great britain) or the pharmaceutical society of northern ireland (113) universities delivering pharmacy degrees approved by the general pharmaceutical council (formerly royal pharmaceutical society of great britain) or the pharmaceutical society of northern ireland notification from the general pharmaceutical council or pharmaceutical society of northern ireland confirming successful completion of the approved pharmacy degree, 12 months practical training and a pass of the registration assessment. 7. point 5.7.1 is replaced by the following: 5.7.1. evidence of formal qualifications of architects recognised pursuant to article 46 country evidence of formal qualifications body awarding the evidence of qualifications certificate accompanying the evidence of qualifications reference academic year belgi /belgique/belgien 1. architect/architecte 1. nationale hogescholen voor architectuur/ecoles nationales sup rieures d'architecture certificat de stage d livr par l'ordre des architectes/stagegetuigschrift afgeleverd door de orde van architecten 1988/1989 2. architect/architecte 2. hogere-architectuur-instituten/instituts sup rieurs d'architecture 3. architect/architecte 3. provinciaal hoger instituut voor architectuur te hasselt/ecole provinciale sup rieure d'architecture de hasselt 4. architect/architecte 4. koninklijke academies voor schone kunsten/acad mies royales des beaux-arts 5. architect/architecte 5. sint-lucasscholen/ecoles saint-luc 6. burgerlijke ingenieur-architect/ing nieur civil architecte 6. faculteiten toegepaste wetenschappen van de universiteiten/facult s des sciences appliqu es des universit s facult polytechnique van mons 7. burgerlijk ingenieur- architect (ir. arch.) 7. katholieke universiteit leuven, faculteit ingenieurswetenschappen 2004/2005 vrije universiteit brussel, faculteit ingenieurswetenschappen 8. master ing nieur civil architecte, finalit sp cialis e 8. facult polytechnique de mons 2008/2009 - a , ' - , ' , ' ' , ' ' , ' 2010/2011 ' , , 2007/2008 , 2009/2010 esk republika architektura a urbanismus fakulta architektury, esk vysok u en technick ( vut) v praze osv d en o spln n kvalifika n ch po adavk pro samostatn v kon profese architekta vydan eskou komorou architekt 2007/2008 vysok u en technick v brn , fakulta architektury in en r architekt (ing.arch.) technick univerzita v liberci, fakulta um n a architektury magistr um n v oboru architektura (mga.) vysok kola um leckopr myslov v praze magistr um n v oboru architektonick tvorba, mga akademie v tvarn ch um n v praze 2007/2008 danmark bevis for kandidatuddannelsen i arkitektur (cand.arch.) kunstakademiets arkitektskole i k benhavn 1988/1989 arkitektskolen i rhus deutschland diplom-ingenieur, universit ten (architektur/hochbau) bescheinigung einer zust ndigen architektenkammer ber die erf llung der qualifikationsvoraussetzungen im hinblick auf eine eintragung in die architektenliste 1988/1989 diplom-ingenieur univ. technische hochschulen (architektur/hochbau) technische universit ten (architektur/hochbau) universit ten-gesamthochschulen (architektur/hochbau) hochschulen f r bildende k nste hochschulen f r k nste diplom-ingenieur, diplom-ingenieur fh fachhochschulen (architektur/hochbau) universit ten-gesamthochschulen (architektur/hochbau) bei entsprechenden fachhochschulstudieng ngen master of arts m.a. hochschule bremen university of applied sciences, fakult t architektur, bau und umwelt school of architecture bremen 2003/2004 fachhochschule m nster (university of applied sciences) muenster school of architecture 2000/2001 georg-simon-ohm-hochschule n rnberg fakult t architektur 2005/2006 hochschule anhalt (university of applied sciences) fachbereich architektur, facility management und geoinformation 2010/2011 hochschule regensburg (university of applied sciences), fakult t f r architektur 2007/2008 technische universit t m nchen, fakult t f r architektur 2009/2010 hochschule lausitz, studiengang architektur, fakult t f r bauen seit juli 2013: brandenburgische technische universit t cottbus-senftenberg 2009/2010 fachhochschule l beck, university of applied sciences, fachbereich bauwesen 2004/2005 fachhochschule f r technik und wirtschaft dresden, fakult t bauingenieurwesen/architektur 2005/2006 fachhochschule erfurt/university of applied sciences 2006/2007 hochschule augsburg/augsburg university of applied sciences 2005/2006 hochschule koblenz, fachbereich bauwesen 2004/2005 hochschule m nchen/fakult t f r architektur 2005/2006 hochschule f r technik stuttgart, fakult t architektur und gestaltung 2005/2006 srh hochschule heidelberg 2013/2014 staatliche akademie der bildenden k nste stuttgart, fachbereich architektur 2006/2007 hochschule konstanz technik, wirtschaft und gestaltung (htwg) 2014/2015 jade hochschule fachbereich archtektur 2016/2017 master of arts (in kombination mit einem bachelorabschluss in architektur) hochschule trier fachbereich gestaltung fachrichtung architektur 2007/2008 master of engineering (in kombination mit einem bachelorabschluss in engineering) technische hochschule mittelhessen (university of applied sciences) fachbereich bauwesen 2010/2011 bachelor of arts b.a. hochschule anhalt (university of applied sciences) fachbereich architektur, facility management und geoinformation 2010/2011 technische universit t m nchen, fakult t f r architektur 2009/2010 alanus hochschule f r kunst und gesellschaft, bonn 2007/2008 hochschule konstanz technik, wirtschaft und gestaltung (htwg) 2014/2015 bachelor of sciences (b.sc.) hochschule bochum, fachbereich architektur 2003/2004 universit t stuttgart, fakult t 1: architektur und stadtplanung 2009/2010 master of science leibniz universit t hannover, fakult t f r architektur und landschaft 2011/2012 fachhochschule aachen, fachbereich architektur 2009/2010 universit t stuttgart, architektur und stadtplanung 2013/2014 master of science (m.sc.) in kombination mit dem bachelor of science (b.sc.) bauhaus-universit t weimar 2005/2006 bauhaus-universit t weimar, fakult t architektur 2008/2009 bauhaus-universit t weimar, fakult t architektur und urbanistik 2013/2014 eesti arhitektuurimagister eesti kunstiakadeemia 2006/2007 ( ), ' ( ) ' 1988/1989 ( ), , 2003/2004 , , 1999/2000 , , 1999/2000 , 2004/2005 espa a t tulo oficial de arquitecto rectores de las universidades enumeradas a continuaci n: 1988/1989 universidad polit cnica de catalu a, escuelas t cnicas superiores de arquitectura de barcelona o del vall s universidad polit cnica de madrid, escuela t cnica superior de arquitectura de madrid escuela de arquitectura de la universidad de las palmas de gran canaria universidad polit cnica de valencia, escuela t cnica superior de arquitectura de valencia universidad de sevilla, escuela t cnica superior de arquitectura de sevilla universidad de valladolid, escuela t cnica superior de arquitectura de valladolid universidad de santiago de compostela, escuela t cnica superior de arquitectura de la coru a universidad del pa s vasco, escuela t cnica superior de arquitectura de san sebasti n universidad de navarra, escuela t cnica superior de arquitectura de pamplona universidad de a coru a 1991/1992 universidad de granada, escuela t cnica superior de arquitectura de granada. 1994/1995 universidad de alicante, escuela polit cnica superior de alicante 1997/1998 universidad europea de madrid 1998/1999 universidad ram n llull, escuela t cnica superior de arquitectura de la salle universidad polit cnica de catalu a, escuela t cnica superior de arquitectura de barcelona 1999/2000 universidad alfonso x el sabio, centro polit cnico superior de villanueva de la ca ada universidad de alcal (escuela de arquitectura) universidad internacional de catalu a, escuela t cnica superior de arquitectura universidad s.e.k. de segovia, centro de estudios integrados de arquitectura de segovia universidad camilo jos cela de madrid 2000/2001 universidad san pablo ceu 2001/2002 universidad ceu cardenal herrera, valencia-escuela superior de ense anzas t cnicas 2002/2003 universidad rovira i virgili 2005/2006 universidad de m laga. escuela t cnica superior de arquitectura universidad de girona. escuela polit cnica superior universidad pontificia de salamanca universidad francisco de vitoria 2006/2007 ie universidad. escuela t cnica superior de estudios integrados de arquitectura 2009/2010 t tulo de graduado/a en arquitectura ie universidad, escuela t cnica superior de estudios integrados de arquitectura 2008/2009 universidad de zaragoza. escuela de ingenier a y arquitectura universidad europea de madrid 2009/2010 universitat internacional de catalunya universidad san jorge (zaragoza) universidad de navarra universidad de girona. escuela polit cnica superior universitat ramon llull, la salle universidad san pablo ceu madrid 2010/2011 universitat polit cnica de val ncia universidad de a coru a. escuela t cnica superior de arquitectura de a coru a universidad rovira i virgili universidad cardenal herrera ceu universidad francisco de vitoria universidad de m laga. escuela t cnica superior de arquitectura universidad de las palmas de gran canaria. escuela de arquitectura universidad de castilla la mancha. escuela de arquitectura universidad camilo jos cela de madrid universidad de alicante, escuela polit cnica superior de alicante universidad de sevilla, escuela t cnica superior de arquitectura de sevilla universitat polit cnica de catalunya universidad de valladolid escuela t cnica superior de arquitectura 2010/2011 universidad de alcal (escuela de arquitectura) 2015/2016 graduado en fundamentos de la arquitectura + m ster en arquitectura universidad polit cnica de madrid. escuela t cnica superior de arquitectura de madrid 2010/2011 universidad antonio de nebrija 2011/2012 escuela t cnica superior de arquitectura universidad del pais vasco/euskal herriko unibertsitatea universidad europea de madrid universidad polit cnica de valencia. escuela t cnica superior de arquitectura 2014/2015 universidad de alicante, escuela polit cnica superior de alicante universidad de alcal de henares. escuela polit cnica de alcal de henares 2015/2016 universidad cardenal herrera ceu 2016/2017 universidad europea de valencia 2013/2014 universidad europea de canarias 2012/2013 universidad de sevilla, escuela t cnica superior de arquitectura 2013/2014 universidad rey juan carlos 2011/2012 universidad de valladolid escuela t cnica superior de arquitectura 2015/2016 graduado en estudios de arquitectura + m ster universitario en arquitectura universidad de zaragoza, escuela de ingenier a y arquitectura 2011/2012 universidad de a coru a. escuela t cnica superior de arquitectura de a coru a 2015/2016 universidad polit cnica de catalunya 2014/2015 france 1. dipl 'me d'architecte dplg, y compris dans le cadre de la formation professionnelle continue et de la promotion sociale. 1. le ministre charg de l'architecture 1988/1989 2. dipl 'me d'architecte esa 2. ecole sp ciale d'architecture de paris 3. dipl 'me d'architecte ensais 3. ecole nationale sup rieure des arts et industries de strasbourg, section architecture 4. dipl 'me d'etat d'architecte (dea) 4. ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture et de paysage de bordeaux (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) habilitation de l'architecte dipl 'm d'etat l'exercice de la ma trise d' uvre en son nom propre (hmonp) (minist re charg de l'architecture) 2005/2006 ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture de bretagne (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur 2005/2006 ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture de clermont-ferrand (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) 2004/2005 ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture de grenoble (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) 2004/2005 ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture et de paysage de lille (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) 2004/2005 ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture de lyon (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) 2004/2005 ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture de marne la vall e (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) 2004/2005 ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture de marseille (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) 2005/2006 ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture de montpellier (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) 2004/2005 ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture de nancy (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) 2004/2005 ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture de nantes (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) 2005/2006 ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture de normandie (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) 2004/2005 ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture de paris-belleville (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) 2005/2006 ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture de paris-la villette (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) 2006/2007 ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture de paris malaquais (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) 2005/2006 ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture de paris val-de-seine (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) 2004/2005 ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture de saint-etienne (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) 2004/2005 ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture de strasbourg (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) 2005/2006 ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture de toulouse (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) 2004/2005 ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture de versailles (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) 2004/2005 dipl 'me d'etat d'architecte (dea), dans le cadre de la formation professionnelle continue ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture de lyon (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) 2006/2007 ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture de marseille (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) 2006/2007 ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture de montpellier (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) 2006/2007 ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture de nantes (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) 2006/2007 ecole nationale sup rieure d'architecture de strasbourg (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) 2006/2007 5. dipl 'me d' tudes de l' cole sp ciale d'architecture grade 2 quivalent au dipl 'me d'etat d'architecte 5. ecole sp ciale d'architecture (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) dipl 'me d'architecte de l'esa habilitant exercer la maitrise d' uvre en son nom propre, quivalent l'habilitation de l'architecte dipl 'm d'etat l'exercice de la ma trise d' uvre en son nom propre, reconnu par le minist re charg de l'architecture 2006/2007 6. dipl 'me d'architecte insa de strasbourg quivalent au dipl 'me d'etat d'architecte conf rant le grade de master (parcours architecte) 6. institut national des sciences appliqu es de strasbourg (insa) (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) habilitation de l'architecte de l'insa exercer la ma trise d' uvre en son nom propre quivalent l'hmonp, reconnue par le minist re charg de l'architecture 2005/2006 dipl 'me d'architecte insa de strasbourg quivalent au dipl 'me d'etat d'architecte conf rant le grade de master (parcours d'architecte pour ing nieur) institut national des sciences appliqu es de strasbourg (insa) (minist re charg de l'architecture et minist re charg de l'enseignement sup rieur) habilitation de l'architecte de l'insa exercer la ma trise d' uvre en son nom propre quivalent l'hmonp, d livr e par le minist re charg de l'architecture 2005/2006 hrvatska magistar/magistrica in enjer/in enjerka arhitekture i urbanizma sveu ili te u zagrebu, arhitektonski fakultet diploma; dopunska isprava o studiju; potvrda hka da podnositelj zahtjeva ispunjava kvalifikacijske uvjete 2005/2006 magistar/magistra in enjer/in enjerka arhitekture i urbanizma sveu ili te u splitu fakultet gra evinarstva, arhitekture i geodezije potvrda hrvatske komore arhitekata da podnositelj zahtjeva zadovoljava uvijete za upis u komoru. 2016/2017 ireland 1. degree of bachelor of architecture (b.arch. nui) 1. national university of ireland to architecture graduates of university college dublin certificate of fulfilment of qualifications requirements for professional recognition as an architect in ireland issued by the royal institute of architects of ireland (riai) 1988/1989 2. degree of bachelor of architecture (b.arch.) (previously, until 2002 degree standard diploma in architecture (dip. arch)) 2. dublin institute of technology, bolton street, dublin (college of technology, bolton street, dublin) 3. certificate of associateship (ariai) 3. royal institute of architects of ireland 4. certificate of membership (mriai) 4. royal institute of architects of ireland 5. degree of bachelor of architecture (honours) (b.arch. (hons) ul) 5. university of limerick 2005/2006 6. degree of bachelor of architecture (honours) (b.arch. (hons) wit) 6. waterford institute of technology 2005/2006 italia (115) laurea in architettura universit di camerino diploma di abilitazione all'esercizio indipendente della professione che viene rilasciato dal ministero della pubblica istruzione (ora ministero dell'istruzione, dell'universit e della ricerca) dopo che il candidato ha sostenuto con esito positivo l'esame di stato davanti ad una commissione competente 1988/1989 universit di catania sede di siracusa universit di chieti universit di ferrara universit di firenze universit di genova universit di napoli federico ii universit di napoli ii universit di palermo universit di parma universit di reggio calabria universit di romala sapienza universit di roma iii universit di trieste politecnico di bari politecnico di milano politecnico di torino istituto universitario di architettura di venezia universit degli studimediterranea di reggio calabria 2000/2001 laurea in ingegneria edile architettura universit dell'aquila 1998/1999 universit di pavia universit di romala sapienza laurea specialistica in ingegneria edile architettura universit dell'aquila 2000/2001 universit di pavia universit di romala sapienza universit di ancona universit di basilicata potenza universit di pisa universit di bologna universit di catania universit di genova universit di palermo universit di napoli federico ii universit di roma tor vergata universit di trento politecnico di bari politecnico di milano universit degli studi di brescia 2001/2002 universit degli studi di cagliari universit politecnica delle marche 2002/2003 universit degli studi della calabria 2003/2004 universit degli studi di salerno 2005/2006 laurea magistrale in ingegneria edile architettura universit dell'aquila 2004/2005 universit di pavia universit di romala sapienza universit di pisa universit di bologna universit di catania universit di genova universit di palermo universit di napoli federico ii universit di roma tor vergata universit di trento politecnico di bari politecnico di milano universit degli studi di salerno 2010/2011 universit degli studi della calabria 2004/2005 universit degli studi di brescia 2004/2005 universit politecnica delle marche 2004/2005 universit degli studi di perugia 2006/2007 universit degli studi di padova 2008/2009 universit degli studi di genova 2014/2015 laurea specialistica quinquennale in architettura prima facolt di architettura dell'universit di romala sapienza 1998/1999 universit di ferrara 1999/2000 universit di genova universit di palermo politecnico di milano politecnico di bari universit di firenze 2001/2002 laurea magistrale quinquennale in architettura prima facolt di architettura dell'universit di romala sapienza 2004/2005 universit di ferrara universit di genova universit di palermo politecnico di bari universit di firenze politecnico di milano laurea specialistica in architettura (progettazione architettonica) universit di roma tre 2001/2002 universit degli studi di napolifederico ii 2005/2006 laurea magistrale in architettura (progettazione architettonica) universit di roma tre 2004/2005 laurea specialistica in architettura universit di napoli ii 2001/2002 politecnico di milano ii facolt di architettura dell'universit degli studi g. d'annunzio di chieti-pescara facolt di architettura, pianificazione e ambiente del politecnico di milano facolt di architettura dell'universit degli studi di trieste facolt di architettura di siracusa, universit di catania facolt di architettura, universit degli studi di parma facolt di architettura, universit di bologna universit iuav di venezia 2002/2003 politecnico di torino facolt di architettura valle giulia, universit degli studi di romala sapienza 2004/2005 universit degli studi di camerino universit di napoli federico ii universit degli studimediterranea di reggio calabria universit degli studi di sassari 2005/2006 laurea specialistica in architettura (progettazione urbanistica) universit degli studimediterranea di reggio calabria 2005/2006 laurea specialistica in progettazione dell'architettura universit di firenze 2001/2002 laurea magistrale in architettura politecnico di milano ii 2004/2005 universit di napoli ii universit di napoli federico ii facolt di architettura dell'universit degli studi g. d'annunzio di chieti-pescara facolt di architettura, pianificazione e ambiente del politecnico di milano universit iuav di venezia facolt di architettura, universit di bologna facolt di architettura di siracusa, universit di catania facolt di architettura, universit degli studi di parma facolt di architettura dell'universit degli studi di trieste universit degli studi di trieste 2014/2015 universit degli studi di camerino 2006/2007 universit degli studi di ennakore 2004/2005 universit degli studi di firenze 2008/2009 universit degli studi di cagliari universit degli studi di udine 2009/2010 universit degli studimediterranea di reggio calabria universit degli studi di sassari 2010/2011 universit degli studi della basilicata universit degli studi di genova 2014/2015 laurea specialistica in architettura -progettazione architettonica e urbana facolt ludovico quaroni dell'universit degli studila sapienza di roma 2000/2001 laurea magistrale in architettura -progettazione architettonica e urbana facolt ludovico quaroni dell'universit degli studila sapienza di roma 2004/2005 laurea specialistica in architettura (progettazione urbana) universit di roma tre 2001/2002 laurea magistrale in architettura (progettazione urbana) universit di roma tre 2004/2005 laurea specialistica in architettura (progettazione urbana e territoriale) politecnico di torino 2002/2003 laurea specialistica in architettura (architettura delle costruzioni) politecnico di milano (facolt di architettura civile) 2001/2002 laurea magistrale in architettura (architettura delle costruzioni) politecnico di milano (facolt di architettura civile) 2004/2005 laurea specialistica architettura delle costruzioni universit degli studi di cagliari 2005/2006 laurea specialistica in architettura (restauro) facolt di architettura di valle giulia dell'universit degli studila sapienza di roma 2004/2005 universit degli studi di roma tre facolt di architettura 2001/2002 universit degli studi di napolifederico ii 2005/2006 laurea magistrale in architettura (restauro) facolt di architettura di valle giulia dell'universit degli studila sapienza di roma 2004/2005 universit degli studi di roma tre facolt di architettura 2009/2010 universit degli studi di napolifederico ii 2004/2005 laurea specialista in architettura (costruzione) politecnico di torino 2002/2003 laurea specialistica in architettura (restauro e valorizzazione) politecnico di torino 2005/2006 laurea specialistica in architettura (ambiente e paesaggio) politecnico di torino 2005/2006 laurea specialistica in architettura (nuove qualit delle costruzioni e dei contesti) universit degli studi della campanialuigi vanvitelli (seconda universit degli studi di napoli) (116) 2007/2008 laurea magistrale in architettura e ingegneria edile universit degli studi della campanialuigi vanvitelli (seconda universit degli studi di napoli) (116) 2009/2010 laurea magistrale in architettura e progetto dell'ambiente urbano universit degli studi della campanialuigi vanvitelli (seconda universit degli studi di napoli) (116) 2009/2010 laurea magistrale in architettura progettazione degli interni e per l'autonomia universit degli studi della campanialuigi vanvitelli (seconda universit degli studi di napoli) (116) 2011/2012 laurea magistrale in architettura progettazione architettonica universit degli studi di napolifederico ii 2004/2005 politecnico di torino 2013/2014 laurea magistrale in architettura e citt , valutazione e progetto universit degli studi di napolifederico ii 2004/2005 laurea specialistica in architettura e citt , valutazione e progetto universit degli studi di napolifederico ii 2007/2008 laurea magistrale in architettura arredamento e progetto universit degli studi di napolifederico ii 2008/2009 laurea magistrale in architettura manutenzione e gestione universit degli studi di napolifederico ii 2008/2009 laurea magistrale in architettura costruzione citt politecnico di torino 2010/2011 laurea magistrale in architettura per il progetto sostenibile politecnico di torino 2010/2011 laurea magistrale in architettura per il restauro e la valorizzazione del patrimonio politecnico di torino 2010/2011 laurea magistrale architettura per la sostenibilit politecnico di torino 2010/2011 laurea magistrale architettura per l'ambiente costruito politecnico di torino 2010/2011 laurea magistrale in architettura e culture del progetto universit iuav di venezia 2013/2014 laurea magistrale in architettura e innovazione universit iuav di venezia 2013/2014 laurea magistrale in architettura per il nuovo e l'antico universit iuav di venezia 2013/2014 laurea magistrale in architettura restauro universit degli studimediterranea di reggio calabria 2013/2014 laurea magistrale sustainable architecture and landscape design architettura sostenibile e progetto del paesaggio politecnico di milano 2015/2016 laurea magistrale architectural design and history progettazione architettonica e storia 2015/2016 laurea magistrale architettura e disegno urbano 2017/2018 ' ' ( ) ' 2005/2006 professional diploma in architecture university of nicosia 2006/2007 (5 ) frederick university, , frederick 2008/2009 (5 ) frederick university, , frederick 2008/2009 (5 ) frederick university, , frederick 2014/2015 latvija arhitekta diploms r gas tehnisk universit te latvijas arhitektu savien bas sertific anas centra arhitekta prakses sertifik ts 2007/2008 lietuva bakalauro diplomas (architekt ros bakalauras) kauno technologijos universitetas architekto kvalifikacijos atestatas (atestuotas architektas) 2007/2008 vilniaus gedimino technikos universitetas vilniaus dail s akademija magistro diplomas (architekt ros magistras) kauno technologijos universitetas vilniaus gedimino technikos universitetas vilniaus dail s akademija magistro diplomas (architekt ros magistras) kauno technologijos universitetas 2016/2017 vilniaus gedimino technikos universitetas vilniaus dail s akademija luxembourg master en architecture universit du luxembourg 2017/2018 magyarorsz g okleveles pit szm rn k msc budapesti m szaki s gazdas gtudom nyi egyetem pit szm rn ki kar a ter leti illet kes p t szkamara hat s gi bizony tv nya a szakmagyakorl si jogosults gr l. 2007/2008 okleveles pit szm rn k sz chenyi istv n egyetem, gy r m szaki tudom nyi kar 2007/2008 okleveles p t szm rn k p csi tudom nyegyetem pollack mih ly m szaki kar 2007/2008 malta degree in bachelor of engineering and architecture (hons) universita' ta' malta warrant b'titlu ta' perit mahrug mill-bord tal-warrant 2007/2008 nederland 1. het getuigschrift van het met goed gevolg afgelegde doctoraal examen van de studierichting bouwkunde, afstudeerrichting architectuur 1. technische universiteit te delft verklaring van de stichting bureau architectenregister die bevestigt dat de opleiding voldoet aan de normen van artikel 46. as of 2014/2015: verklaring van bureau architectenregister die bevestigt dat aan de eisen voor de beroepskwalificatie van architect is voldaan 1988/1989 2. het getuigschrift van het met goed gevolg afgelegde doctoraal examen van de studierichting bouwkunde, differentiatie architectuur en urbanistiek 2. technische universiteit te eindhoven 3. het getuigschrift hoger beroepsonderwijs, op grond van het met goed gevolg afgelegde examen verbonden aan de opleiding van de tweede fase voor beroepen op het terrein van de architectuur, afgegeven door de betrokken examencommissies van respectievelijk: 1988/1989 de amsterdamse hogeschool voor de kunsten te amsterdam de hogeschool rotterdam en omstreken te rotterdam de hogeschool katholieke leergangen te tilburg de hogeschool voor de kunsten te arnhem de rijkshogeschool groningen te groningen de hogeschool maastricht te maastricht 4. master of science in architecture, urbanism & building sciences variant architecture 4. technische universiteit delft faculteit bouwkunde 2003/2004 master of science in architecture, building and planning (specialisatie: architecture) technische universiteit eindhoven 2002/2003 master of architecture artez hogeschool voor de kunsten/artez academie van bouwkunst 2003/2004 amsterdamse hogeschool van de kunsten/academie van bouwkunst amsterdam 2003/2004 hanze hogeschool groningen/academie van bouwkunst groningen 2003/2004 hogeschool rotterdam/rotterdamse academie van bouwkunst 2003/2004 fontys hogeschool voor de kunsten/academie voor architectuur en stedenbouw in tilburg 2003/2004 sterreich 1. diplom-ingenieur, dipl.-ing. 1. technische universit t graz (erzherzog-johann-universit t graz) bescheinigung des bundesministers f r wissenschaft, forschung und wirtschaft ber die erf llung der voraussetzung f r die eintragung in die architektenkammer/bescheinigung einer bezirksverwaltungsbeh rde ber die ausbildung oder bef higung, die zur aus bung des baumeistergewerbes (berechtigung f r hochbauplanung) berechtigt 1998/1999 2. diplom-ingenieur, dipl.-ing. 2. technische universit t wien 3. diplom-ingenieur, dipl.-ing. 3. universit t innsbruck (leopold-franzens-universit t innsbruck) 4. magister der architektur, magister architecturae, mag. arch. 4. universit t f r angewandte kunst in wien 5. magister der architektur, magister architecturae, mag. arch. 5. akademie der bildenden k nste in wien 6. magister der architektur, magister architecturae, mag. arch. 6. universit t f r k nstlerische und industrielle gestaltung in linz 7. bachelor of science in engineering (bsc) (aufgrund eines bachelorstudiums), diplom-ingenieur/in (dipl.-ing. oder di) f r technisch-wissenschaftlich berufe (aufgrund eines bachelor- und eines masterstudiums entspricht msc) 7. fachhochschule k rnten 2004/2005 8. diplom-ingenieur, dipl.-ing. 8. universit t innsbruck (leopold-franzens-universit t innsbruck) 2008/2009 9. diplom-ingenieur, dipl.-ing. 9. technische universit t graz (erzherzog-johann-universit t graz) 2008/2009 10. diplom-ingenieur, dipl.-ing. 10. technische universit t wien 2006/2007 11. master of architecture (march) (aufgrund eines bachelor- und eines masterstudiums entspricht msc) 11. universit t f r k nstlerische und industrielle gestaltung linz 2008/2009 11. akademie der bildenden k nste wien 2008/2009 12. masterstudium der architektur 12. universit t f r angewandte kunst wien 2011/2012 13. ba-studiengang bauplanung u. bauwirtschaft studienzweig architektur u. ma-studiengang architektur 13. fachhochschule joanneum graz 2015/2016 14. bachelorstudienganggreen building und masterstudiengangarchitektur green building 14. fachhochschule campus wien 2016/2017 polska magister in ynier architekt (mgr in . arch.) politechnika bia ostocka za wiadczenie o cz onkostwie w okrgowej izbie architekt w/za wiadczenie krajowej rady izby architekt w rp potwierdzaj ce posiadanie kwalifikacji do wykonywania zawodu architekta zgodnych z wymaganiami wynikaj cymi z przepis w prawa unii europejskiej osoby nie bd cej cz onkiem izby 2007/2008 politechnika gda ska politechnika dzka politechnika l ska zachodniopomorski uniwersytet technologiczny w szczecinie politechnika warszawska politechnika krakowska politechnika wroc awska krakowska akademia im. andrzeja frycza modrzewskiego 2003/2004 dyplom uko czenia studi w wy szych potwierdzaj cy uzyskanie tytu u zawodowego magistra in yniera architekta wy sza szko a ekologii i zarz dzania w warszawie 2011/2012 politechnika lubelska 2008/2009 uniwersytet techniczno-przyrodniczy im. jana i jdrzeja niadeckich w bydgoszczy 2011/2012 politechnika pozna ska 2007/2008 uniwersytet zielonog rski 2008/2009 dyplom studi w wy szych potwierdzaj cy uzyskanie tytu u zawodowego magistra in yniera architekta politechnika witokrzyska 2012/2013 portugal carta de curso de licenciatura em arquitectura faculdade de arquitectura da universidade t cnica de lisboa certificado de cumprimento dos pr -requisitos de qualifica o para inscri o na ordem dos arquitectos, emitido pela competente ordem dos arquitectos 1988/1989 faculdade de arquitectura da universidade do porto escola superior art stica do porto faculdade de ci ncias e tecnologia da universidade de coimbra universidade lus ada de lisboa 1986/1987 faculdade de arquitectura e artes da universidade lus ada de vila nova de famalic o 1993/1994 universidade lus fona de humanidades e tecnologia 1995/1996 instituto superior manuel teixeira gomes 1997/1998 universidade do minho 1997/1998 instituto superior t cnico da universidade t cnica de lisboa 1998/1999 iscte-instituto universit rio de lisboa 1998/1999 carta de curso de licenciatura em arquitectura e urbanismo escola superior gallaecia 2002/2003 para os cursos iniciados a partir do ano acad mico de 1991/1992 faculdade de arquitectura e artes da universidade lus ada do porto 1991/1992 mestrado integrado em arquitectura universidade aut noma de lisboa 2001/2002 universidade t cnica de lisboa (instituto superior t cnico) 2001/2002 universidade lus fona do porto 2005/2006 carta de curso de mestrado integrado em arquitectura universidade do minho 1997/1998 iscte-instituto universit rio de lisboa 1999/2000 universidade lus ada de vila nova de famalic o 2006/2007 universidade lus fona de humanidades e tecnologias 1995/1996 faculdade de arquitectura da universidade t cnica de lisboa 2008/2009 universidade de vora 2007/2008 escola superior art stica do porto (esap) 1988/1989 (licenciatura) 2007/2008 (mestrado) instituto superior manuel teixeira gomes 2006/2007 universidade lus ada do porto 2006/2007 carta de curso de mestrado integrado em arquitectura e urbanismo universidade fernando pessoa 2006/2007 esg/escola superior gallaecia 2002/2003 diploma de mestre em arquitectura universidade lus ada de lisboa 1988/1989 universidade da beira interior 2003/2004 universidade de coimbra 2008/2009 carta de curso, grau de licenciado universidade de vora 2001/2002 carta de curso de mestre em arquitectura universidade do porto 2003/2004 certid o de licenciatura em arquitectura universidade cat lica portuguesa centro regional das beiras 2001/2002 diploma de mestrado integrado em arquitectura universidade cat lica portuguesa centro regional das beiras 2001/2002 rom nia diploma de arhitect universitatea de arhitectur i urbanismion mincu certificat de dob ndire a dreptului de semn tur si de nscriere n tabloul na ional al arhitec ilor 2010/2011 universitateapolitehnic din timi oara 2011/2012 universitatea tehnic din cluj-napoca 2010/2011 universitatea tehnic gheorghe asachi din ia i 2007/2008 universitatea spiru haret facultatea de arhitectur 2009/2010 diploma de licen i master universitatea de arhitectur i urbanismion mincu 2011/2012 universitateapolitehnic din timi oara universitatea tehnic din cluj-napoca universitatea tehnic gheorghe asachi din ia i universitatea spiru haret facultatea de arhitectur slovenija magister in enir arhitekture/magistrica in enirka arhitekture univerza v ljubljani, fakulteta za arhitekturo potrdilo zbornice za arhitekturo in prostor o usposobljenosti za opravljanje nalog odgovornega projektanta arhitekture 2007/2008 diploma o pridobljeni magistrski izobrazbi 2. stopnje univerza v mariboru; fakulteta za gradbeni tvo, prometno in enirstvo in arhitekturo slovensko diplom in iniera architekta (titul ing. arch.) slovensk technick univerzita v bratislave, fakulta architekt ry, tudijn odbor 5.1.1 architekt ra a urbanizmus certifik t vydan slovenskou komorou architektov na z klade 3-ro nej praxe pod doh adom a vykonania autoriza nej sk ky 2007/2008 technick univerzita v ko iciach, fakulta umen , tudijn odbor 5.1.1. architekt ra a urbanizmus 2004/2005 diplom magistra umen (titul mgr. art.) vysok kola v tvarn ch umen v bratislave, tudijn odbor 2.2.7 architektonick tvorba 2007/2008 suomi/finland arkkitehdin tutkinto/arkitektexamen teknillinen korkeakoulu/tekniska h gskolan (helsinki) 1998/1999 tampereen teknillinen korkeakoulu/tammerfors tekniska h gskola oulun yliopisto/ule borgs universitet aalto-yliopisto/aalto- universitetet tampereen teknillinen yliopisto/tammerfors tekniska universitet oulun yliopisto 2010/2011 tampereen teknillinen yliopisto 2010/2011 aalto-yliopisto/aalto-universitetet 2010/2011 sverige arkitektexamen chalmers tekniska h gskola ab 1998/1999 kungliga tekniska h gskolan lunds universitet ume universitet 2009/2010 united kingdom 1. diplomas in architecture 1. universities certificate of architectural education, issued by the architects registration board. the diploma and degree courses in architecture of the universities, schools and colleges of art should have met the requisite threshold standards as laid down in article 46 of this directive and in criteria for validation published by the validation panel of the royal institute of british architects and the architects registration board. eu nationals who possess the royal institute of british architects part i and part ii certificates, which are recognised by arb as the competent authority, are eligible. also eu nationals who do not possess the arb-recognised part i and part ii certificates will be eligible for the certificate of architectural education if they can satisfy the board that their standard and length of education has met the requisite threshold standards of article 46 of this directive and of the criteria for validation. an architects registration board part 3 certificate of architectural education 1988/1989 colleges of art schools of art cardiff university 2006/2007 university for the creative arts 2008/2009 birmingham city university 2008/2009 university of nottingham 2008/2009 2. degrees in architecture 2. universities 1988/1989 3. final examination 3. architectural association final examination (arb/riba part 2) architectural association 2011/2012 4. examination in architecture 4. royal college of art 5. examination part ii 5. royal institute of british architects 6. master of architecture 6. university of liverpool 2006/2007 cardiff university 2006/2007 university of plymouth 2007/2008 queens university, belfast 2009/2010 northumbria university 2009/2010 university of brighton 2010/2011 birmingham city university 2010/2011 university of kent 2006/2007 university of ulster 2008/2009 university of edinburgh/edinburgh school of architecture and landscape architecture 2009/2010 leeds metropolitan university 2011/2012 leeds beckett university (until 2014 leeds metropolitan university) 2014/2015 university of newcastle upon tyne 2011/2012 university of lincoln 2011/2012 university of huddersfield 2012/2013 university of the west of england 2011/2012 university of westminster 2011/2012 university for the creative arts 2013/2014 university of central lancashire 2014/2015 7. graduate diploma in architecture 7. university college london 2006/2007 8. professional diploma in architecture 8. university of east london 2007/2008 northumbria university 2008/2009 9. graduate diploma in architecture/march architecture 9. university college london 2008/2009 10. postgraduate diploma in architecture 10. leeds metropolitan university 2007/2008 university of edinburgh 2008/2009 sheffield hallam university 2009/2010 11. march architecture (arb/riba part 2) 11. university college london 2011/2012 university of nottingham 2013/2014 university of east london 2013/2014 12. master of architecture (march) 12. liverpool john moores university 2011/2012 de montfort university 2011/2012 arts university bournemouth 2011/2012 nottingham trent university 2012/2013 13. postgraduate diploma in architecture and architectural conservation 13. university of edinburgh 2008/2009 14. postgraduate diploma in architecture and urban design 14. university of edinburgh 2008/2009 15. mphil in environmental design in architecture (option b) 15. university of cambridge 2009/2010 mphil in architecture and urban design university of cambridge 2013/2014 16. professional diploma in architecture: advanced environmental and energy studies 16. university of east london/centre for alternative technology 2008/2009 17. marchd in applied design in architecture 17. oxford brookes university 2011/2012 18. m'arch 18. university of portsmouth 2011/2012 19. master of architecture (international) 19. university of huddersfield 2012/2013 20. master of architecture with honours 20. cardiff university 2015/2016 21. march (architecture) 21. kingston university 2013/2014 22. march in architecture 22. university of greenwich 2013/2014 23. the degree of master of architecture in the college of humanities and social science 23. university of edinburgh/edinburgh school of architecture and landscape architecture 2012/2013 24. m.arch 24. sheffield hallam university 2013/2014 25. march architecture 25. university of the arts london is the awarding body and the march architecture is offered by central saint martins 2015/2016 26. march: master of architecture 26. london south bank university 2015/2016 27. master of architecture with urban planning 27. university of dundee 2015/2016 28. march architecture: collaborative practice 28. university of sheffield 2015/2016 29. master of architecture m.arch hull school of art and design (open university) 2015/2016 (1) as from september 2013. (2) as from september 2013. (3) as from october 2014. (4) until 2012. (5) as of 2013. (6) as of 2011. (7) as of january 2013. (8) as of june 2015. (9) as of february 2015. (10) as of 1991/1992. (11) as of june 2015. (12) as of july 2011. (13) as of june 2015. (14) as of may 2006. (15) as of june 2015. (16) as of 3 november 2015. (17) as of september 2008. (18) as of may 2015. (19) as of 2006. (20) as of 2012. (21) as of june 2015. (22) as of june 2015. (23) date of repeal within the meaning of article 27(3): 30 december 1994. (24) as from 2012. (25) until 2012. (26) date of repeal within the meaning of article 27(3): 4 april 2000. (27) as of may 2006. (28) as of june 2015. (29) date of repeal within the meaning of article 27(3): 3 june 2015. (30) date of repeal within the meaning of article 27(3): 30 december 1994. (31) as of may 2015. (32) date of repeal within the meaning of article 27(3): 1 january 1983. (33) as of june 2015. (34) date of repeal within the meaning of article 27(3): 14 june 2017. (35) as of september 2011. (36) date of repeal within the meaning of article 27(3): 1 january 1983. (37) as of june 2017. (38) until 14 september 2010. (39) as of october 2009. (40) as of june 2015. (41) as of october 2009. (42) as of october 2009. (43) as of february 2015. (44) as of september 2008. (45) as from 2012. (46) as from 2016. (47) 1 august 1987 except for persons having commenced training prior to that date. (48) 31 december 1971. (49) 31 october 1999. (50) evidence of qualifications is no longer awarded for training commenced after 5 march 1982. (51) 9 july 1984. (52) 31 march 2004. (53) 1 february 1984. (54) 3 december 1971. (55) 31 october 1993. (56) evidence of qualifications is no longer awarded for training commenced after 5 march 1982. (57) 8 july 1984. (58) 31 march 2004. (59) 1 january 1991. (60) as of june 2015. (61) as of october 2009. (62) as of may 2015. (63) as of june 2015. (64) as of february 2015. (65) date of repeal within the meaning of article 27(3): 8 december 2016. (66) as of june 2015. (67) as of february 2015. (68) as of september 2008. (69) as of july 2017. (70) date of repeal within the meaning of article 27(3): 12 august 1996. (71) as of september 2008. (72) 30 september 2007. (73) 28 february 2013. (74) date of repeal within the meaning of article 27(3): 31 december 1994. (75) as of june 2015. (76) date of repeal within the meaning of article 27(3): 3 june 2015. (77) date of repeal within the meaning of article 27(3): 1 january 1983. (78) as of 17 february 2006. (79) date of repeal within the meaning of article 27(3): 3 june 2015. (80) as of 21 november 2003. (81) as of february 2018. (82) as of september 2016. (83) training leading to the award of evidence of formal qualifications as a specialist in dental, oral and maxillo-facial surgery (basic medical and dental training) assumes completion and validation of basic medical studies (article 24) and, in addition, completion and validation of basic dental studies (article 34). (84) as of 2006. (85) as of 10 july 2014. (86) as of 2009. (87) as of january 2013. (88) this evidence of formal qualification entitles the holder to automatic recognition when it is issued to the nationals of member states who obtained qualification in ireland. (89) this information on the evidence of qualifications was included to ensure that graduates trained in ireland would be entitled to automatic recognition without the need for actual registration in ireland, such registration not being part of the qualification process. (90) this information on the evidence of qualifications replaces previous entries for the uk in order to ensure that graduates trained in the united kingdom would be entitled to automatic recognition of their qualification without the need for actual registration, such registration not being part of the qualification process. (91) valid until 2001. (92) as of 2001/2002. (93) until 2012. (94) as of 2013. (95) the evidence of formal qualifications should also be accompanied by a certificate of completion of the post-graduate internship (sta podyplomowy) except for persons who did not start the internship before 2 october 2016 and applied between 2 october 2016 and 28 february 2017 for the right to pursue the profession of dentist. (96) as of 1 october 2011. (97) as of 1 september 2017. (98) valid until 22 november 2006. (99) as of 23 november 2006. (100) valid until 10 april 2008. (101) as of 11 april 2008. (102) as of 10 january 2011. (103) as of 1 october 2011. (104) as of 1 october 2012. (105) this evidence of formal qualification entitles the holder to automatic recognition when it is issued to the nationals of member states who obtained qualification in ireland. (106) this information on the evidence of qualifications was included to ensure that graduates trained in ireland would be entitled to automatic recognition without the need for actual registration in ireland, such registration not being part of the qualification process. (107) this information on the evidence of qualifications was included to ensure that graduates trained in the united kingdom would be entitled to automatic recognition of their qualification without the need for actual registration, such registration not being part of the qualification process. (108) valid until 2001. (109) as of 2001/2002. (110) this evidence of formal qualification entitles the holder to automatic recognition when it is issued to the nationals of member states who obtained qualification in ireland. (111) this information on the evidence of qualifications was included to ensure that graduates trained in ireland would be entitled to automatic recognition without the need for actual registration in ireland. in such cases, the accompanying certificate testifies the completion of all qualifications requirements. (112) this evidence of formal qualification entitles the holder to automatic recognition of their qualification when it is issued to the nationals of member states who obtained qualification in the united kingdom. (113) this information on the evidence of qualifications was included to ensure that graduates trained in the united kingdom would be entitled to automatic recognition of their qualification without the need for actual registration. in such cases, the accompanying certificate testifies the completion of all qualifications requirements. (114) as of 10 january 2011. (115) the two denominations universit degli studi di (name of the town) and universit di (name of the town) are equivalent terms that identify the same university. (116) as of october 2016 denomination changed into universit degli studi della campania luigi vanvitelli .

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/602 of 11 april 2019 amending annex i to decision 2006/168/ec as regards the inclusion of the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland and certain of its crown dependencies in the list of third countries authorised for the introduction into the european union of bovine embryos (notified under document c(2019) 2833) (text with eea relevance.) type: decision_impl subject matter: european construction; europe; natural and applied sciences; means of agricultural production; trade; tariff policy; health; agricultural activity; agricultural policy date published: 2019-04-12 12.4.2019 en official journal of the european union l 103/41 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/602 of 11 april 2019 amending annex i to decision 2006/168/ec as regards the inclusion of the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland and certain of its crown dependencies in the list of third countries authorised for the introduction into the european union of bovine embryos (notified under document c(2019) 2833) (text with eea relevance) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to council directive 89/556/eec of 25 september 1989 on animal health conditions governing intra-community trade in and importation from third countries of embryos of domestic animals of the bovine species (1), and in particular article 7(1) and article 9(1)(b) thereof, whereas: (1) on 29 march 2017, the united kingdom submitted the notification of its intention to withdraw from the union pursuant to article 50 of the treaty on european union (teu). on 22 march 2019, the european council adopted decision (eu) 2019/476 (2) extending the period under article 50(3) teu in agreement with the united kingdom. in accordance with that decision, in the event that the withdrawal agreement is not approved by the house of commons by 29 march 2019 at the latest, the period provided for in article 50(3) teu is extended until 12 april 2019. as the withdrawal agreement has not been approved by 29 march 2019, union law will cease to apply to and in the united kingdom from 13 april 2019 (the withdrawal date). (2) commission decision 2006/168/ec (3) sets out in its annex i a list of third countries from which member states are to authorise imports of bovine embryos. (3) the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland has provided the necessary guarantees for that country and certain of its crown dependencies to comply with the conditions laid down in decision 2006/168/ec for the introduction into the union of consignments of bovine embryos from the withdrawal date by continuing to comply with union legislation for an initial period of at least nine months. (4) therefore, taking into account these specific guarantees provided by the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland and in order to avoid any unnecessary disruption to trade after the withdrawal date, the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland and certain of its crown dependencies should be included in the list of third countries set out in annex i to decision 2006/168/ec authorised for the introduction into the union of consignments of bovine embryos. (5) annex i to decision 2006/168/ec should therefore be amended accordingly. (6) this decision should apply from 13 april 2019, unless union law continues to apply to and in the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland on that date. (7) the measures provided for in this decision are in accordance with the opinion of the standing committee on plants, animals, food and feed, has adopted this decision: article 1 annex i to decision 2006/168/ec is amended in accordance with the annex to this decision. article 2 this decision shall apply from 13 april 2019. however, it shall not apply if union law continues to apply to and in the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland on that date. article 3 this decision is addressed to the member states. done at brussels, 11 april 2019. for the commission jyrki katainen vice-president (1) oj l 302, 19.10.1989, p. 1. (2) european council decision (eu) 2019/476 taken in agreement with the united kingdom of 22 march 2019 extending the period under article 50(3) teu (oj l 80 i, 22.3.2019, p. 1). (3) commission decision 2006/168/ec of 4 january 2006 establishing the animal health and veterinary certification requirements for imports into the community of bovine embryos and repealing decision 2005/217/ec (oj l 57, 28.2.2006, p. 19). annex the table set out in annex i to decision 2006/168/ec is amended as follows: (a) the following lines are inserted after the entry for switzerland: gb united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland annex ii annex iii annex iv gg guernsey annex ii annex iii annex iv (b) the following line is inserted after the entry for israel: je jersey annex ii annex iii annex iv

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/605 of 11 april 2019 amending annex ii to decision 2007/777/ec as regards the inclusion of the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland and certain of its crown dependencies in the list of third countries or parts thereof authorised for the introduction into the union of consignments of certain meat products and treated stomachs, bladders and intestines for human consumption (notified under document c(2019) 2840) (text with eea relevance.) type: decision_impl subject matter: europe; foodstuff; european construction; agricultural policy; animal product; tariff policy; trade date published: 2019-04-12 12.4.2019 en official journal of the european union l 103/50 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/605 of 11 april 2019 amending annex ii to decision 2007/777/ec as regards the inclusion of the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland and certain of its crown dependencies in the list of third countries or parts thereof authorised for the introduction into the union of consignments of certain meat products and treated stomachs, bladders and intestines for human consumption (notified under document c(2019) 2840) (text with eea relevance) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to council directive 2002/99/ec of 16 december 2002 laying down the animal health rules governing the production, processing, distribution and introduction of products of animal origin for human consumption (1), and in particular the introductory phrase of article 8, the first subparagraph of point (1) and point (4) of article 8 and article 9(4) thereof, whereas: (1) on 29 march 2017, the united kingdom submitted the notification of its intention to withdraw from the union pursuant to article 50 of the treaty on european union (teu). on 22 march 2019, the european council adopted decision (eu) 2019/476 (2) extending the period under article 50(3) teu in agreement with the united kingdom. in accordance with that decision, in the event that the withdrawal agreement is not approved by the house of commons by 29 march 2019 at the latest, the period provided for in article 50(3) teu is extended until 12 april 2019. as the withdrawal agreement has not been approved by 29 march 2019, union law will cease to apply to and in the united kingdom from 13 april 2019 (the withdrawal date). (2) commission decision 2007/777/ec (3) lays down, inter alia, the conditions for the introduction into the union of consignments of certain meat products and of treated stomachs, bladders and intestines which have undergone one of the treatments laid down in part 4 of annex ii thereto (the commodities), including a list of third countries or parts thereof from which the introduction into the union of the commodities is authorised. (3) part 2 of annex ii to decision 2007/777/ec sets out the list of third countries or parts thereof which are authorised for the introduction into the union of the commodities, provided that they have undergone the relevant treatment referred to in that part of annex ii. those treatments are aimed at eliminating certain animal health risks linked to the specific commodities. part 4 of that annex sets out a non-specific treatment a and specific treatments b to f listed in descending order of severity of the animal health risk linked to the specific commodity. (4) the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland has provided the necessary guarantees for that country and certain of its crown dependencies to comply with the conditions laid down in decision 2007/777/ec for the introduction into the union of consignments of commodities for human consumption with treatment a from the withdrawal date by continuing to comply with union legislation for an initial period of at least nine months. (5) therefore, taking into account these specific guarantees provided by the united kingdom, of great britain and northern ireland and in order to avoid any unnecessary disruption to trade after the withdrawal date, the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland and certain of its crown dependencies, should be included in the list of third countries and parts thereof set out in part 2 of annex ii to decision 2007/777/ec authorised for the introduction into the union of consignments of the commodities. (6) annex ii to decision 2007/777/ec should therefore be amended accordingly. (7) this decision should apply from 13 april 2019, unless union law continues to apply to and in the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland on that date. (8) the measures provided for in this decision are in accordance with the opinion of the standing committee on plants, animals, food and feed, has adopted this decision: article 1 part 2 to annex ii to decision 2007/777/ec shall be amended in accordance with the annex to this decision. article 2 this decision shall apply from 13 april 2019. however, it shall not apply if union law continues to apply to and in the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland on that date. article 3 this decision is addressed to the member states. done at brussels, 11 april 2019. for the commission jyrki katainen vice-president (1) oj l 18, 23.1.2003, p. 11. (2) european council decision (eu) 2019/476 taken in agreement with the united kingdom of 22 march 2019 extending the period under article 50(3)teu (oj l 80 i, 22.3.2019, p. 1). (3) commission decision 2007/777/ec of 29 november 2007 laying down the animal and public health conditions and model certificates for imports of certain meat products and treated stomachs, bladders and intestines for human consumption from third countries and repealing decision 2005/432/ec (oj l 312, 30.11.2007, p. 49). annex the table set out in part 2 to annex ii to decision 2007/777/ec is amended as follows: (a) the following lines are inserted after the entry for ethiopia: gb united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland a a a a a a a a a a a a a gg guernsey a a a a a a a a a a a a a (b) the following line is inserted after the entry for iceland: je jersey a a a a a a a a a a a a a

name: council decision (eu) 2019/597 of 9 april 2019 on the establishment of a high-level group of wise persons on the european financial architecture for development type: decision subject matter: eu finance; free movement of capital; eu institutions and european civil service; economic conditions date published: 2019-04-12 12.4.2019 en official journal of the european union l 103/26 council decision (eu) 2019/597 of 9 april 2019 on the establishment of a high-level group of wise persons on the european financial architecture for development the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 240(2) thereof, whereas: (1) there is a need to reflect on the european financial architecture for development. to that end, a high-level group of wise persons on the european financial architecture for development (the wise persons group) should be established. (2) the wise persons group should submit to the council an independent report providing a view on the challenges to and opportunities for improving and rationalising the european financial architecture for development as well as scenarios for its evolution in line with european policy objectives, in order to inform the reflection of the council on that subject, has adopted this decision: article 1 establishment and task 1. a high-level group of wise persons on the european financial architecture for development (the wise persons group) is hereby established within the framework of the general secretariat of the council. 2. the task of the wise persons group shall be to submit to the council an independent report in accordance with the terms of reference set out in the annex to this decision. the wise persons group is established up to the fulfillment of its mandate as defined in the terms of reference and in accordance with the deadline set out therein. article 2 membership 1. mr thomas wieser is hereby appointed as the chair of the wise persons group. 2. mr jos antonio alonso, ms monique barbut, mr erik bergl f, mr jacek dominik, mr nanno d. kleiterp, mr norbert kloppenburg, mr franco passacantando and ms susan ulb k are hereby appointed as members of the wise persons group. article 3 entry into force this decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at luxembourg, 9 april 2019. for the council the president g. ciamba annex high-level group of wise persons on the european financial architecture for development terms of reference 1. the wise persons group 1.1. composition the wise persons group shall comprise six to eight independent and impartial experts. they shall be appointed on the basis of professional and technical expertise and experience in finance, development and the relevant institutional landscape. the composition of the wise persons group shall take into account gender and geographical balance. it shall reflect a broad spectrum of those criteria and take into account the institutional diversity among the member states. the chair and the members of the wise persons group shall declare upon appointment that they have no conflict of interests and that they are independent and impartial. 1.2. selection the council shall appoint the chair and the members of the wise persons group after examination of the proposed candidates by coreper. the chair shall be responsible for proposing a limited group of experts, reflecting the principles referred to in point 1.1. comprehensive curricula vitae of all proposed candidates shall be provided to the member states in advance of the examination by coreper. 1.3. financial provisions members of the wise persons group who are required to travel away from their place of residence in order to carry out their duties in brussels shall be entitled to reimbursement of their travel expenses and an allowance in accordance with decision no 21/2009 of the deputy secretary general of the council of the european union on the reimbursement of mission expenses of persons other than staff members of the council of the european union. the corresponding expenditure shall be borne by the council. 2. timeline shortly after its appointment, the wise persons group shall present its work programme to coreper. within three months of its establishment, the wise persons group shall inform coreper of the state of play of its work. the relevant council bodies, including the working party of financial counsellors, the working party on development cooperation and the ad hoc working party on the neighbourhood, development and international cooperation instrument, shall be regularly updated by the wise persons group upon request. the wise persons group shall deliver the final report to the council six months after its appointment. the purpose of the report and any recommendations made in fulfilling its mandate shall be to inform and assist the council in its discussions and possible decision-making. under no circumstances shall the report or any recommendations be construed as the position of the council, including in respect of ongoing legislative procedures. the council shall decide on the follow-up to the report. the involvement and cooperation of the economic and financial affairs council and the foreign affairs council (development) shall be ensured. 3. mandate for the purposes of these terms of reference, the european financial architecture for development includes the european investment bank (eib), the european bank for reconstruction and development (ebrd), and the financial instruments managed by the commission. in its analysis of the european financial architecture for development, the wise persons group shall take a system-wide perspective. in order to avoid duplication of existing activities and to encourage opportunities for further cooperation with other key development actors, the wise persons group shall, in particular, consider how to maximise the added value of the european financial architecture for development within the existing diverse landscape of relevant national bodies in the member states, such as national development financial institutions and agencies, and international and multilateral institutional bodies, such as the council of europe development bank or the world bank. the wise persons group shall also take into account the overall developments and needs that have shaped the global financial architecture for development over time and how the global financial architecture has been adapted to those developments and needs. the wise persons group shall describe the challenges to and opportunities for rationalising the european financial architecture for development, dealing in particular with the respective roles of the eib and of the ebrd. it shall recommend scenarios for the evolution of the european financial architecture for development, including recommendations on clear prioritisation and sequencing, taking into account the potential associated costs, on the basis of: an assessment of the capacity of the current european financial architecture for development to deliver on the union's policy priorities for external action and development, notably in terms of development impact, effectiveness, additionality, overlaps and value for money; an analysis of the respective strengths and weaknesses of the mandates and instruments of all actors involved, including the risk management, governance, shareholding and incentive structures of the eib and the ebrd; an examination of the strategies put forward by the eib, the ebrd and the commission to further develop their mandates with a view to enhancing private sector development and sovereign lending, including, as appropriate, in least-developed and fragile countries. 4. consultation the wise persons group may consult with the relevant union institutions and bodies, including the european parliament, the commission and the eib, and with the relevant national institutional bodies in the member states, such as national development financial institutions and agencies. it may also consult the ebrd. where necessary, the wise persons group may invite other bodies, including from beneficiary countries, to provide written input or contribute during its meetings. the wise persons group shall ensure transparency in the consultation process by listing all consultations in the appendix to its report. 5. secretariat the general secretariat of the council shall be responsible for the secretariat of the wise persons group. it shall provide the administrative support necessary to ensure the functioning of the wise persons group, including as regards the publication of documents. the corresponding costs, including those linked to organisation and meetings, shall be borne by the council.

name: council decision (eu) 2019/593 of 8 april 2019 on the conclusion, on behalf of the european union, of the agreement establishing the eu-lac international foundation type: decision subject matter: international affairs; legal form of organisations; america; european construction; extra-european organisations date published: 2019-04-12 12.4.2019 en official journal of the european union l 103/1 council decision (eu) 2019/593 of 8 april 2019 on the conclusion, on behalf of the european union, of the agreement establishing the eu-lac international foundation the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on european union, and in particular article 37 thereof, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular articles 209(2) and 212(1), in conjunction with point (a) of the second subparagraph of article 218(6) and the second subparagraph of article 218(8) thereof, having regard to the joint proposal from the high representative of the union for foreign affairs and security policy and from the european commission, having regard to the consent of the european parliament (1), whereas: (1) in accordance with council decision (eu) 2016/1873 (2), the agreement establishing the eu-lac international foundation (the agreement) was signed on 25 october 2016 , subject to its conclusion at a later date. (2) the agreement will establish the eu-lac foundation as an international organisation with legal personality under public international law. (3) when acting in the framework of the eu-lac foundation, the union and its member states should coordinate their positions in accordance with the treaties and with the principle of sincere cooperation. (4) the agreement should be approved, has adopted this decision: article 1 the agreement establishing the eu-lac international foundation is hereby approved on behalf of the union. the text of the agreement is attached to this decision. article 2 the president of the council shall designate the person(s) empowered to deposit, on behalf of the union, the instrument of ratification provided for in article 24 of the agreement. article 3 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at luxembourg, 8 april 2019. for the council the president f. mogherini (1) consent of 4 october 2017 (not yet published in the official journal). (2) council decision (eu) 2016/1873 of 10 october 2016 on the signing, on behalf of the european union, of the agreement establishing the eu-lac international foundation (oj l 288, 22.10.2016, p. 1).

name: european council decision (eu) 2019/584 taken in agreement with the united kingdom of 11 april 2019 extending the period under article 50(3) teu type: decision subject matter: eu institutions and european civil service; european construction; electoral procedure and voting; europe date published: 2019-04-11 11.4.2019 en official journal of the european union l 101/1 european council decision (eu) 2019/584 taken in agreement with the united kingdom of 11 april 2019 extending the period under article 50(3) teu the european council, having regard to the treaty on european union, and in particular article 50(3) thereof, whereas: (1) on 29 march 2017, the united kingdom notified the european council of its intention to withdraw from the european union and the european atomic energy community (euratom) in accordance with article 50 of the treaty on the european union, which applies to euratom by virtue of article 106a of the treaty establishing the european atomic energy community. (2) in accordance with article 50 teu, the european union negotiated with the united kingdom an agreement setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal, taking account of the framework for its future relationship with the union. (3) on 25 november 2018, the european council endorsed the draft agreement on the withdrawal of the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland from the european union and the european atomic energy community (withdrawal agreement) and approved the political declaration setting out the framework for the future relationship between the european union and the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland. on 11 january 2019, the council adopted decision (eu) 2019/274 (1) on the signing of the withdrawal agreement (2). (4) according to article 50(3) teu, the treaties are to cease to apply to the withdrawing state from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification, unless the european council, in agreement with the member state concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period. (5) by letter of 20 march 2019, the united kingdom submitted a request for an extension of the period provided for in article 50(3) teu until 30 june 2019, with a view to finalising the ratification of the withdrawal agreement. (6) by decision (eu) 2019/476 (3), the european council, in agreement with the united kingdom, decided to extend the period under article 50(3) teu until 22 may 2019 in the event that the house of commons approved the withdrawal agreement by 29 march 2019. if that were not to be the case, the european council agreed to an extension until 12 april 2019 and specified that it expected the united kingdom to indicate a way forward before 12 april 2019, for its consideration. (7) the house of commons did not approve the withdrawal agreement by 29 march 2019. (8) by letter of 5 april 2019, the united kingdom submitted a request for a further extension of the period provided for in article 50(3) teu, as extended by the european council, until 30 june 2019, with a view to finalising the ratification of the withdrawal agreement. (9) on 10 april 2019, the european council agreed to a further extension to allow for the ratification of the withdrawal agreement by both parties. such an extension should last as long as necessary and, in any event, no longer than 31 october 2019. the european council also recalled that, under article 50(3) teu, the withdrawal agreement may enter into force on an earlier date, should the parties complete their respective ratification procedures before 31 october 2019. consequently, the withdrawal should take place on the first day of the month following the completion of the ratification procedures or on 1 november 2019, whichever is the earliest. (10) this further extension cannot be allowed to undermine the regular functioning of the union and its institutions. furthermore, it will have the consequence that the united kingdom will remain a member state until the new withdrawal date, with full rights and obligations in accordance with article 50 teu, and that the united kingdom has a right to revoke its notification at any time. if the united kingdom is still a member state on 23-26 may 2019, and if it has not ratified the withdrawal agreement by 22 may 2019, it will be under an obligation to hold the elections to the european parliament in accordance with union law. in the event that those elections do not take place in the united kingdom, the extension should cease on 31 may 2019. the european council takes note of the commitment by the united kingdom to act in a constructive and responsible manner throughout the extension period in accordance with the duty of sincere cooperation, and expects the united kingdom to fulfil this commitment and treaty obligation in a manner that reflects its situation as a withdrawing member state. to this effect, the united kingdom shall facilitate the achievement of the union's tasks and shall refrain from any measure which could jeopardise the attainment of the union's objectives, in particular when participating in the decision-making processes of the union. (11) the ongoing mandates of members of institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the union nominated, appointed or elected in relation to the united kingdom's membership of the union will end as soon as the treaties cease to apply to the united kingdom, i.e. on the date of the withdrawal. (12) this extension excludes any re-opening of the withdrawal agreement. any unilateral commitment, statement or other act by the united kingdom should be compatible with the letter and the spirit of the withdrawal agreement, and must not hamper its implementation. such an extension cannot be used to start negotiations on the future relationship. (13) the european council will review progress at its meeting in june 2019. (14) as provided for in article 50(4) teu, the united kingdom has not taken part in the discussions of the european council concerning this decision nor in its adoption. however, as set out in the letter from the permanent representative of the uk to the european union, sir tim barrow of 11 april 2019, it has agreed, in accordance with article 50(3) teu, to the extension of the period referred to in that article and to this decision, has adopted this decision: article 1 the period provided for in article 50(3) teu, as extended by the european council decision (eu) 2019/476, is hereby further extended until 31 october 2019. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption. this decision shall cease to apply on 31 may 2019 in the event that the united kingdom has not held elections to the european parliament in accordance with applicable union law and has not ratified the withdrawal agreement by 22 may 2019. done at brussels, 11 april 2019. for the european council the president d. tusk (1) council decision (eu) 2019/274 of 11 january 2019 on the signing, on behalf of the european union and of the european atomic energy community, of the agreement on the withdrawal of the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland from the european union and the european atomic energy community (oj l 47 i, 19.2.2019, p. 1). (2) the text of the withdrawal agreement attached to decision (eu) 2019/274 was published in oj c 66 i, 19.2.2019, p. 1. (3) european council decision (eu) 2019/476 taken in agreement with the united kingdom of 22 march 2019 extending the period under article 50(3) teu (oj l 80 i, 22.3.2019, p. 1).

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/583 of 3 april 2019 confirming or amending the provisional calculation of the average specific emission of co2 and specific emissions targets for manufacturers of passenger cars for the calendar year 2017 and for certain manufacturers belonging to the volkswagen pool for the calendar years 2014, 2015 and 2016 pursuant to regulation (ec) no 443/2009 of the european parliament and of the council (notified under document c(2019) 2359) (text with eea relevance.) type: decision_impl subject matter: environmental policy; technology and technical regulations; deterioration of the environment; land transport; mechanical engineering date published: 2019-04-11 11.4.2019 en official journal of the european union l 100/66 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/583 of 3 april 2019 confirming or amending the provisional calculation of the average specific emission of co2 and specific emissions targets for manufacturers of passenger cars for the calendar year 2017 and for certain manufacturers belonging to the volkswagen pool for the calendar years 2014, 2015 and 2016 pursuant to regulation (ec) no 443/2009 of the european parliament and of the council (notified under document c(2019) 2359) (only the czech, dutch, english, french, german, hungarian, italian and swedish texts are authentic) (text with eea relevance) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to regulation (ec) no 443/2009 of the european parliament and of the council of 23 april 2009 setting emission performance standards for new passenger cars as part of the community's integrated approach to reduce co2 emissions from light-duty vehicles (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of article 8(5) thereof, whereas: (1) in accordance with regulation (ec) no 443/2009, the commission is required to calculate each year the average specific emissions of co2 and the specific emissions target for each manufacturer of passenger cars in the union as well as for each pool of manufacturers. on the basis of that calculation, the commission is to determine whether manufacturers and pools have complied with their specific emissions targets. (2) the detailed data to be used for the calculation of the average specific emissions of co2 and the specific emissions targets is based on member states' registrations of new passenger cars during the preceding calendar year. (3) all member states submitted the 2017 data to the commission. where, as a result of the verification of the data by the commission, it was evident that certain data were missing or manifestly incorrect, the commission contacted the member states concerned and, subject to the agreement of those member states, adjusted or completed the data accordingly. where no agreement could be reached with a member state, the provisional data of that member state was not adjusted. (4) on 23 april 2018, the commission published the provisional data and notified 91 manufacturers of the provisional calculations of their average specific emissions of co2 and their specific emissions targets in 2017. manufacturers were asked to verify the data and to notify the commission of any errors within three months of receipt of the notification. 35 manufacturers submitted notifications of errors within the given time-limit. (5) for the remaining 56 manufacturers that did not notify any errors in the datasets or respond otherwise, the provisional data and provisional calculations of the average specific emissions and the specific emissions targets should be confirmed. for two manufacturers all vehicles reported in the provisional dataset were outside the scope of regulation (ec) no 443/2009. (6) the commission has verified the errors notified by the manufacturers and the respective reasons for their correction, and the provisional dataset has been confirmed or amended as appropriate. (7) in the case of records with missing or incorrect identification parameters, such as the type, variant, version code or the type approval number, the fact that manufacturers cannot verify or correct those records should be taken into account. as a consequence, it is appropriate to apply an error margin to the co2 emissions and mass values of those records. (8) the error margin should be calculated as the difference between the distances to the specific emissions target expressed as the specific emissions target subtracted from the average specific emissions calculated including and excluding those registrations that cannot be verified by the manufacturers. regardless of whether that difference is positive or negative, the error margin should always improve the manufacturer's position with regard to its specific emission target. (9) in accordance with article 10(2) of regulation (ec) no 443/2009, a manufacturer should be considered as compliant with its specific emissions target referred to in article 4 of that regulation where the average emissions indicated in this decision are lower than the specific emissions target, expressed as a negative distance to target. where the average emissions exceed the specific emissions target, an excess emission premium is to be imposed, unless the manufacturer concerned benefits from an exemption from that target or is a member of a pool and the pool complies with its specific emissions target. on that basis, soci t des automobiles alpine sas, automobili lamborghini s.p.a. and mazda motor corporation should be considered as exceeding their specific emissions targets for 2017. (10) on 3 november 2015, the volkswagen group made a statement to the effect that irregularities had been found when determining type approval co2 levels of some of their vehicles. following a thorough investigation, sufficient clarifications have been obtained for confirming or amending the provisional data for audi ag, audi hungaria motor kft, bugatti automotive s.a.s, quattro gmbh, seat s.a., skoda auto a.s., and volkswagen ag for the calendar years 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017. however, further clarifications are needed from dr ing. h.c. f. porsche ag with regard to possible irregularities in the co2 emissions and fuel consumption values stated in the emissions type approval of one vehicle model. as a consequence, the values for those calendar years for the volkswagen pool and its member dr ing. h.c. f. porsche ag cannot be confirmed or amended. (11) the commission has, in accordance with article 12 of commission implementing regulation (eu) no 725/2011 (2), performed an ad hoc verification of co2 savings certified by reference to commission implementing decision 2013/341/eu (3) and commission implementing decision (eu) 2015/158 (4). the verification showed satisfactory results with regard to the co2 savings certified by reference to implementing decision 2013/341/eu. however, with regard to implementing decision (eu) 2015/158, the certified co2 savings of two efficient alternators fitted in vehicles manufactured by daimler ag exceeded the savings resulting from the commission's verification by 9 % and 23 % respectively. the commission notified daimler ag of the deviations found and invited that manufacturer to provide evidence demonstrating the accuracy of the certified co2 savings. (12) based on the information provided by daimler ag, the commission has found that the difference in savings was due to the way in which the testing methodology referred to in implementing decision (eu) 2015/158 was applied for the purposes of the certification. more precisely, a run-in of the efficient alternators was performed prior to the certification test, even though the testing methodology referred to in that implementing decision neither prescribes nor allows a specific run-in of the efficient alternators to be performed outside the certification test. (13) it follows from article 12 of regulation (ec) no 443/2009 that, in order for co2 savings from innovative technologies to be taken into account for the calculation of a manufacturer's specific average emissions, those savings must make a verified contribution to co2 reductions, in accordance with a testing methodology capable of producing verifiable, repeatable and comparable results. as the certified co2 savings of two efficient alternators in certain vehicles manufactured by daimler ag have not been confirmed by the verification performed on the basis of the testing methodology referred to in implementing decision (eu) 2015/158, the certified co2 savings attributed to those eco-innovations, in total 0,292 gco2/km, should not be taken into account for the calculation of the average specific emissions of daimler ag. (14) the values relating to the performance of a manufacturer as confirmed or amended by this decision could be revised in the event that the relevant national authorities confirm the existence of irregularities in the co2 emission values provided for the purpose of determining the manufacturer's compliance with the specific emissions target, has adopted this decision: article 1 1. the values relating to the performance of manufacturers, as confirmed or amended for each manufacturer of passenger cars and for each pool of such manufacturers in respect of the 2017 calendar year are specified in annex i. 2. the values relating to the performance of audi ag, audi hungaria motor kft, bugatti automotive s.a.s, quattro gmbh, seat s.a., skoda auto a.s., and volkswagen ag, as confirmed or amended in respect of the 2014, 2015 and 2016 calendar years are specified in annex ii. article 2 this decision is addressed to the following individual manufacturers and pools formed in accordance with article 7 of regulation (ec) no 443/2009: (1) adidor voitures sas 2/4 rue hans list 78290 croissy-sur-seine france (2) alfa romeo s.p.a. gate 8 building 6 1st floor b15n colonna n47 c.so settembrini, 40 10135 torino italy (3) alpina burkard bovensiepen gmbh & co. kg alpenstra e 35 - 37 86807 buchloe germany (4) soci t des automobiles alpine sas 1 avenue du golf 78288 guyancourt cedex france (5) aston martin lagonda ltd gaydon engineering centre banbury road gaydon warwickshire cv35 0db united kingdom (6) audi ag letter box 011/1882 38436 wolfsburg germany (7) audi hungaria motor kft letter box 011/1882 38436 wolfsburg germany (8) automobiles citroen 7, rue henri sainte-claire deville 92500 rueil-malmaison france (9) automobiles peugeot 7, rue henri sainte-claire deville 92500 rueil-malmaison france (10) avtovaz jsc represented in the union by: cs autolada 211 konevova 130 00 prague 3 czechia (11) bee bee automotive 182 rt beaug 72700 rouillon france (12) bentley motors ltd pyms lane crewe cheshire cw1 3pl united kingdom (13) bluecar sas 31-32 quai de dion bouton 92800 puteaux france (14) bayerische motoren werke ag petuelring 130 80788 m nchen germany (15) bmw m gmbh petuelring 130 80788 m nchen germany (16) bugatti automobiles sas letter box 011/1882 38436 wolfsburg germany (17) byd auto industry company limited represented in the union by: byd europe b.v. 's-gravelandseweg 256 3125 bk schiedam the netherlands (18) caterham cars ltd 2 kennet road dartford kent da1 4qn united kingdom (19) chevrolet italia s.p.a. bahnhofsplatz 1 ipc 39-12 65423 r sselsheim germany (20) fca us llc represented in the union by: fiat chrysler automobiles gate 8 building 6 1st floor b15n colonna n47 c.so settembrini, 40 10135 torino italy (21) cng-technik gmbh niehl plant, building imbert 479 henry-ford-stra e 1 50735 k ln germany (22) automobile dacia sa guyancourt 1 avenue du golf 78288 guyancourt cedex france (23) daimler ag f403, ea/r 70546 stuttgart germany (24) donkervoort automobielen bv pascallaan 96 8218 nj lelystad the netherlands (25) dr motor company srl s.s. 85, venafrana km 37,500 86070 macchia d'isernia italy (26) ferrari s.p.a. via emilia est 1163 41122 modena italy (27) fca italy s.p.a. gate 8 building 6 1st floor b15n colonna n47 c.so settembrini, 40 10135 torino italy (28) ford india private ltd represented in the union by: ford werke gmbh niehl plant, building imbert 479 henry-ford-stra e 1 50735 k ln germany (29) ford motor company niehl plant, building imbert 479 henry-ford-stra e 1 50735 k ln germany (30) ford werke gmbh niehl plant, building imbert 479 henry-ford-stra e 1 50735 k ln germany (31) general motors holdings llc represented in the union by: knowmotive bouwhuispad 1 8121 px olst netherlands (32) gm korea company represented in the union by: adam opel gmbh bahnhofsplatz 1 ipc 39-12 65423 r sselsheim germany (33) great wall motor company ltd represented in the union by: great wall motor europe technical center gmbh otto-hahn-str. 5 63128 dietzenbach germany (34) honda automobile (china) co., ltd represented in the union by: honda motor europe ltd cain road bracknell berkshire rg12 1hl united kingdom (35) honda motor co., ltd represented in the union by: honda motor europe ltd cain road bracknell berkshire rg12 1hl united kingdom (36) honda turkiye a.s. represented in the union by: honda motor europe ltd cain road bracknell berkshire rg12 1hl united kingdom (37) honda of the uk manufacturing ltd honda motor europe ltd cain road bracknell berkshire rg12 1hl united kingdom (38) hyundai motor company represented in the union by: hyundai motor europe gmbh kaiserleipromenade 5 63067 offenbach germany (39) hyundai assan otomotiv sanayi ve ticaret a.s. represented in the union by: hyundai motor europe gmbh kaiserleipromenade 5 63067 offenbach germany (40) hyundai motor manufacturing czech s.r.o. kaiserleipromenade 5 63067 offenbach germany (41) hyundai motor europe gmbh kaiserleipromenade 5 63067 offenbach germany (42) hyundai motor india ltd represented in the union by: hyundai motor europe gmbh kaiserleipromenade 5 63067 offenbach germany (43) jaguar land rover ltd abbey road whitley coventry cv3 4lf united kingdom (44) kia motors corporation represented in the union by: kia motors europe gmbh theodor-heuss-allee 11 60486 frankfurt am main germany (45) kia motors slovakia s.r.o. theodor-heuss-allee 11 60486 frankfurt am main germany (46) koenigsegg automotive ab valhall park 262 74 angelholm sweden (47) ktm-sportmotorcycle ag stallhofnerstrasse 3 5230 mattighofen austria (48) lada automobile gmbh erlengrund 7-11 21614 buxtehude germany (49) automobili lamborghini s.p.a. via modena 12 40019 sant'agata bolognese (bo) italy (50) lotus cars ltd hethel norwich norfolk nr14 8ez united kingdom (51) magyar suzuki corporation ltd 2500 esztergom schweidel jozsef u52 hungary (52) mahindra & mahindra ltd represented in the union by: mahindra europe s.r.l. via cancelliera 35 00040 ariccia (roma) italy (53) man truck & bus ag letter box 011/1882 38436 wolfsburg germany (54) maruti suzuki india ltd represented in the union by: magyar suzuki corporation ltd 2500 esztergom schweidel jozsef u52 hungary (55) maserati s.p.a. viale ciro menotti 322 41122 modena italy (56) mazda motor corporation represented in the union by: mazda motor europe gmbh european r & d centre hiroshimastr 1 61440 oberursel/ts germany (57) mclaren automotive ltd chertsey road woking surrey gu21 4yh united kingdom (58) mercedes-amg gmbh f403, ea/r 70546 stuttgart germany (59) mg motor uk ltd international hq q gate low hill lane birmingham b31 2bq united kingdom (60) mitsubishi motors corporation mmc represented in the union by: mitsubishi motors europe b.v. mme mitsubishi avenue 21 6121 sh born the netherlands (61) mitsubishi motors europe b.v. mme mitsubishi avenue 21 6121 sh born the netherlands (62) mitsubishi motors thailand co., ltd mmth represented in the union by: mitsubishi motors europe b.v. mme mitsubishi avenue 21 6121 sh born the netherlands (63) morgan technologies ltd pickersleigh road malvern link worcestershire wr14 2ll united kingdom (64) nissan international sa represented in the union by: renault nissan representation office av des arts 40 1040 bruxelles belgium (65) noble automotive ltd 24a centurion way meridian business park leicester le19 1wh united kingdom (66) adam opel gmbh bahnhofsplatz 1 ipc 39-12 65423 r sselsheim germany (67) opel automobile gmbh bahnhofsplatz 1 ipc 39-12 65423 r sselsheim germany (68) pagani automobili s.p.a. via dell' artigianato 5 41018 san cesario sul panaro (modena), italy (69) perodua uk limited dorney house 46 - 48a high street buckinghamshire sl1 7jp united kingdom (70) pgo automobiles za de la pyramide 30380 saint christol les al s france (71) dr ing hc f porsche ag letter box 011/1882 38436 wolfsburg germany (72) psa automobiles sa 2-10 boulevard de l'europe 78300 paris france (73) quattro gmbh letter box 011/1882 38436 wolfsburg germany (74) radical motorsport ltd 24 ivatt way business park westwood peterborough pe3 7pg united kingdom (75) renault s.a.s. guyancourt 1 avenue du golf 78288 guyancourt cedex france (76) renault trucks 99 route de lyon ter l10 0 01 69802 saint priest cedex france (77) rolls-royce motor cars ltd petuelring 130 80788 m nchen germany (78) seat sa letter box 011/1882 38436 wolfsburg germany (79) secma s.a.s. rue denfert rochereau 59580 aniche france (80) skoda auto as letter box 011/1882 38436 wolfsburg germany (81) ssangyong motor company represented in the union by: ssangyong motor europe office herriotstrasse 1 60528 frankfurt am main germany (82) subaru cooperation represented in the union by: subaru europe n.v./s.a leuvensesteenweg 555 b/8 1930 zaventem belgium (83) suzuki motor corporation represented in the union by: magyar suzuki corporation ltd 2500 esztergom schweidel jozsef u52 hungary (84) suzuki motor thailand co. ltd represented in the union by: magyar suzuki corporation ltd 2500 esztergom schweidel jozsef u52 hungary (85) tecno meccanica imola spa represented in the union by: via selice provinciale 42/e 40026 imola bologna italy (86) tesla motors ltd represented in the union by: tesla motors nl 7-9 atlasstraat 5047 rg tilburg the netherlands (87) toyota motor europe nv/sa avenue du bourget 60 1140 brussels belgium (88) volkswagen ag letter box 011/1882 38436 wolfsburg germany (89) volvo car corporation vak building assar gabrielssons v g 405 31 g teborg sweden (90) pool for: bmw group petuelring 130 80788 munich germany (91) pool for: daimler ag f403, ea/r 70546 stuttgart germany (92) pool for: fca italy s.p.a. c.so settembrini, 40 gate 8 building 6 1st floor b15n colonna n47 10135 torino italy (93) pool for: ford-werke gmbh niehl plant, building imbert 479 henry ford strasse 1 50735 k ln germany (94) pool for: general motors bahnhofsplatz 1 ipc 39-12 65423 r sselsheim germany (95) pool for: honda motor europe ltd 470 london road slough berkshire sl3 8qy united kingdom (96) pool for: hyundai hyundai motor europe gmbh kaiserleipromenade 5 63067 offenbach germany (97) pool for: kia theodor-heuss-allee 11 60486 frankfurt am main germany (98) pool for: mitsubishi motors mitsubishi avenue 21 6121 sh born the netherlands (99) pool for: renault 1 avenue du golf 78288 guyancourt cedex france (100) pool for: suzuki suzuki allee 7 64625 bensheim germany (101) pool for: tata motors ltd, jaguar cars ltd, land rover abbey road whitley coventry cv3 4lf united kingdom (102) vw group pc letter box 011/1882 38436 wolfsburg germany done at brussels, 3 april 2019. for the commission miguel arias ca ete member of the commission (1) oj l 140, 5.6.2009, p. 1. (2) commission implementing regulation (eu) no 725/2011 of 25 july 2011 establishing a procedure for the approval and certification of innovative technologies for reducing co2 emissions from passenger cars pursuant to regulation (ec) no 443/2009 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 194, 26.7.2011, p. 19). (3) commission implementing decision 2013/341/eu of 27 june 2013 on the approval of the valeo efficient generation alternator as an innovative technology for reducing co2 emissions from passenger cars pursuant to regulation (ec) no 443/2009 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 179, 29.6.2013, p. 98). (4) commission implementing decision (eu) 2015/158 of 30 january 2015 on the approval of two robert bosch gmbh high efficient alternators as the innovative technologies for reducing co2 emissions from passenger cars pursuant to regulation (ec) no 443/2009 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 26, 31.1.2015, p. 31). annex i table 1 values relating to the performance of manufacturers confirmed or amended in accordance with the second subparagraph of article 8(5) of regulation (ec) no 443/2009 for calendar year 2017 a b c d e f g h i j manufacturer name pools and derogations number of registrations average specific emissions of co2 (100 %) specific emissions target distance to target distance to target adjusted average mass co2 savings from eco-innovations average co2 emissions (100 %) adidor voitures sas dmd 42 159,000 1 300,00 159,000 alfa romeo spa p3 82 132 120,506 133,388 12,882 12,884 1 466,54 120,506 alpina burkard bovensiepen gmbh e co kg dmd 486 179,021 1 874,76 179,021 societe des automobiles alpine 7 137,000 119,425 17,575 17,575 1 161,00 137,000 aston martin lagonda ltd d 2 174 289,245 299,000 9,755 9,755 1 873,04 289,245 audi ag p13 776 701 124,527 137,686 13,159 13,159 1 560,59 124,527 audi hungaria motor kft p13 7 743 145,060 129,957 15,103 15,103 1 391,47 145,060 automobiles citroen 626 876 105,584 122,062 16,478 16,478 1 218,71 105,584 automobiles peugeot 949 417 104,533 123,476 18,943 18,943 1 249,64 104,533 avtovaz jsc p10 3 767 171,997 121,641 50,356 50,356 1 209,50 171,997 bee bee automotive dmd 4 0,000 763,50 0,000 bentley motors ltd d 3 439 267,428 287,000 19,572 19,572 2 514,71 267,428 bluecar sas dmd 340 0,000 1 455,68 0,000 bayerische motoren werke ag p1 965 330 120,794 138,061 17,267 17,267 1 568,78 0,173 120,967 bmw m gmbh p1 17 246 160,703 141,478 19,225 19,225 1 643,57 0,205 160,908 bugatti automobiles sas p13 13 517,769 160,949 356,820 356,820 2 069,62 517,769 byd auto industry company limited dmd 1 0,000 2 495,00 0,000 caterham cars limited dmd 119 141,975 620,76 141,975 chevrolet italia spa p5 2 119,000 107,040 11,960 11,960 890,00 119,000 fca us llc p3 104 206 141,530 140,371 1,159 1,157 1 619,33 141,530 cng-technik gmbh p4 517 162,714 137,815 24,899 24,899 1 563,40 162,714 automobile dacia sa p10 456 291 117,496 121,287 3,791 3,792 1 201,74 117,496 daimler ag p2 959 295 126,672 139,684 13,304 13,306 1 604,30 0,087 126,759 donkervoort automobielen bv dmd 6 178,000 865,00 178,000 dr motor company srl dmd 410 151,634 1 257,80 151,634 ferrari spa d 2 578 282,772 290,000 7,228 7,228 1 732,75 282,772 fca italy spa p3 789 688 116,079 120,190 4,111 4,112 1 177,74 116,079 ford india private limited p4 35 037 113,770 114,631 0,861 0,861 1 056,10 113,770 ford motor company p4 19 185 205,214 149,988 55,226 55,219 1 829,77 205,214 ford-werke gmbh p4 969 899 119,360 130,121 10,761 10,764 1 395,05 119,360 general motors holdings llc p5 2 478 260,976 151,809 109,167 109,167 1 869,62 260,976 gm korea company p5 6 139,500 136,166 3,334 3,334 1 527,33 139,500 great wall motor company limited dmd 2 214,500 1 735,50 214,500 honda automobile china co ltd p6 1 125,000 117,643 7,357 7,357 1 122,00 125,000 honda motor co ltd p6 72 149 119,922 124,126 4,204 4,204 1 263,86 0,062 119,984 honda turkiye as p6 766 138,168 128,157 10,011 10,011 1 352,07 0,174 138,342 honda of the uk manufacturing ltd p6 58 701 135,935 135,678 0,257 0,257 1 516,64 0,003 135,938 hyundai motor company p7 89 118 115,397 133,556 18,159 18,159 1 470,21 115,397 hyundai assan otomotiv sanayi ve ticaret as p7 172 602 113,695 115,302 1,607 1,607 1 070,77 113,695 hyundai motor manufacturing czech sro p7 235 459 131,628 132,985 1,357 1,357 1 457,71 131,628 hyundai motor europe gmbh p7 256 111,055 134,884 23,829 23,829 1 499,28 111,055 hyundai motor india ltd p7 3 134,667 114,703 19,964 19,964 1 057,67 134,667 jaguar land rover limited p12/nd 229 124 151,667 178,025 26,358 26,358 1 953,18 151,667 kia motors corporation p8 299 233 113,941 127,350 13,409 13,409 1 334,42 113,941 kia motors slovakia sro p8 156 263 132,944 132,392 0,552 0,552 1 444,74 132,944 koenigsegg automotive ab dmd 3 381,000 1 442,00 381,000 ktm-sportmotorcycle ag dmd 27 191,667 886,11 191,667 lada automobile gmbh dmd 917 216,000 1 285,15 216,000 automobili lamborghini spa d 897 320,896 316,000 4,896 4,815 1 682,85 320,896 lotus cars limited d 704 204,964 225,000 20,036 20,036 1 150,01 204,964 magyar suzuki corporation ltd p11/nd 111 790 121,564 123,114 1,550 1,552 1 221,97 121,564 mahindra & mahindra ltd dmd 410 187,344 1 986,61 187,344 man truck & bus ag p13 3 194,000 169,299 24,701 24,701 2 252,33 194,000 maruti suzuki india ltd p11/nd 19 780 100,060 123,114 23,054 23,054 957,15 100,060 maserati spa d 8 715 199,485 242,000 42,515 42,515 2 150,33 199,485 mazda motor corporation nd 215 697 130,745 129,426 1,319 1,319 1 324,24 0,026 130,771 mclaren automotive limited d 790 252,158 270,000 17,842 17,842 1 525,91 252,158 mercedes-amg gmbh p2 2 111 241,227 142,677 98,550 98,550 1 669,80 241,227 mg motor uk limited d 4 385 128,122 146,000 17,878 17,878 1 301,50 128,122 mitsubishi motors corporation mmc p9 75 724 125,682 138,791 13,109 13,109 1 584,76 125,682 mitsubishi motors europe bv mme p9 9 135,000 127,377 7,623 7,623 1 335,00 135,000 mitsubishi motors thailand co ltd mmth p9 29 213 96,637 108,541 11,904 11,904 922,84 96,637 morgan technologies ltd dmd 415 194,535 1 083,06 194,535 nissan international sa 562 522 116,915 128,675 11,760 11,760 1 363,41 116,915 noble automotive ltd d 2 335,500 1 416,00 335,500 adam opel gmbh p5 748 316 123,837 127,333 3,496 3,496 1 334,05 123,837 opel automobile gmbh 168 684 123,572 127,263 3,691 3,691 1 332,52 0,006 123,578 pagani automobili spa dmd 2 343,000 1 340,00 343,000 perodua uk limited dmd 1 137,000 1 025,00 137,000 pgo automobiles dmd 3 202,333 1 281,67 202,333 psa automobiles sa 503 130,205 137,935 7,730 7,730 1 566,03 130,205 quattro gmbh p13 7 188 218,391 149,262 69,129 69,129 1 813,88 218,391 radical motorsport ltd dmd 7 343,000 1 148,00 343,000 renault sas p10 1 171 619 106,280 126,441 20,161 20,162 1 314,53 106,280 renault trucks dmd 25 169,800 2 200,84 169,800 rolls-royce motor cars ltd p1 600 329,247 181,831 147,416 147,416 2 526,56 329,247 seat sa p13 386 597 117,749 124,835 7,086 7,087 1 279,38 117,749 secma sas dmd 50 133,560 686,86 133,560 skoda auto as p13 660 580 115,948 126,105 10,157 10,255 1 307,18 0,023 115,971 ssangyong motor company nd 16 426 157,207 167,573 10,366 10,366 1 668,47 157,207 subaru corporation nd 28 951 160,390 164,616 4,226 4,226 1 594,90 160,390 suzuki motor corporation p11/nd 78 324 114,500 123,114 8,614 8,614 964,30 114,500 suzuki motor thailand co ltd p11/nd 23 258 96,756 123,114 26,358 26,358 882,16 96,756 tecno meccanica imola spa dmd 4 0,000 749,50 0,000 tesla motors ltd 17 780 0,000 172,304 172,304 172,304 2 318,09 0,000 toyota motor europe nv sa 692 814 103,069 127,740 24,671 24,906 1 342,94 103,069 volkswagen ag p13 1 634 804 120,391 130,638 10,247 10,250 1 406,36 120,391 volvo car corporation 277 748 124,437 146,260 21,823 21,823 1 748,19 124,437 table 2 values relating to the performance of pools confirmed or amended in accordance with the second subparagraph of article 8(5) of regulation (ec) no 443/2009 for calendar year 2017 a b c d e f g h i j pool names pool number of registrations average specific emissions of co2 (100 %) specific emissions target distance to target distance to target adjusted average mass co2 savings from eco-innovations average co2 emissions (100 %) bmw group p1 983 176 121,621 138,147 16,526 16,526 1 570,67 0,173 121,794 daimler ag p2 961 406 126,924 139,690 13,058 13,061 1 604,44 0,087 127,011 fca italy spa p3 976 026 119,169 123,455 4,286 4,288 1 249,19 119,169 ford-werke gmbh p4 1 024 638 120,798 129,967 9,169 9,172 1 391,68 120,798 general motors p5 750 802 124,290 127,414 3,124 3,124 1 335,82 124,290 honda motor europe ltd p6 131 617 127,170 129,301 2,131 2,131 1 377,11 0,036 127,206 hyundai p7 497 438 122,487 126,952 4,465 4,465 1 325,71 122,487 kia p8 455 496 120,460 129,080 8,620 8,620 1 372,27 120,460 mitsubishi motors p9 104 946 117,597 130,369 12,772 12,772 1 400,48 117,597 renault p10 1 631 677 109,568 124,989 15,421 15,422 1 282,75 109,568 suzuki pool p11/nd 233 152 114,892 123,114 8,222 8,223 1 079,05 114,892 tata motors ltd, jaguar cars ltd, land rover p12/nd 229 124 151,667 178,025 26,358 26,358 1 953,18 151,667 vw group pc (1) p13 explanatory notes to tables 1 and 2: column a: table 1: manufacturer name means the name of the manufacturer as notified to the commission by the manufacturer concerned or, where no such notification has taken place, the name registered by the registration authority of the member state. table 2: pool name means the name of the pool declared by the pool manager. column b: d means that a derogation relating to a small volume manufacturer has been granted in accordance with article 11(3) of regulation (ec) no 443/2009 for the calendar year 2017; nd means that a derogation relating to a niche manufacturer has been granted in accordance with article 11(4) of regulation (ec) no 443/2009 for the calendar year 2017; dmd means that a de minimis exemption applies in accordance with article 2(4) of regulation (ec) no 443/2009, i.e. a manufacturer which together with all its connected undertakings was responsible for fewer than 1 000 new registered vehicles in 2017 does not have to meet a specific emissions target; p means that the manufacturer is a member of a pool (listed in table 2) formed pursuant to article 7 of regulation (ec) no 443/2009 and the pooling agreement is valid for calendar year 2017. column c: number of registrations means the total number of new cars registered by member states in a calendar year, not counting those registrations that relate to records where the values for mass and/or co2 are missing and those records which the manufacturer does not recognise. the number of registrations reported by member states may otherwise not be changed. column d: average specific emissions of co2 (100 %) means the average specific emissions of co2 (in g co2/km) that have been calculated on the basis of 100 % of the vehicles attributed to the manufacturer. where appropriate, the average specific emissions of co2 take into account the errors notified to the commission by the manufacturer concerned. the records used for the calculation include those that contain a valid value for mass and co2 emissions. the average specific emissions of co2 include emission reductions resulting from the use of innovative technologies referred to in article 12 of regulation (ec) no 443/2009 (see also note on column i). column e: specific emissions target means the emissions target calculated on the basis of the average mass of all vehicles attributed to a manufacturer applying the formula set out in annex i to regulation (ec) no 443/2009. column f: distance to target means the difference between the average specific emissions of co2 specified in column d and the specific emissions target in column e. where the value in column f is positive the average specific emissions of co2 exceed the specific emissions target. column g: distance to target adjusted means that where the values in this column are different from those in column f, the values in that column have been adjusted to take into account an error margin. the error margin only applies if the manufacturer has notified the commission of records with the error code b as set out in article 9(3) of commission regulation (eu) no 1014/2010 (2). the error margin is calculated in accordance with the following formula: error = absolute value of [(ac1 tg1) (ac2 tg2)] ac1= the average specific emissions of co2 including the unidentifiable vehicles (as set out in column d); tg1= the specific emissions target including the unidentifiable vehicles (as set out in column e); ac2= the average specific emissions of co2 excluding the unidentifiable vehicles; tg2= the specific emissions target excluding the unidentifiable vehicles. column h: average mass means the average of the mass in running order (kilogrammes) of the vehicles attributed to the manufacturer. column i: co2 savings from eco-innovations means the emission reductions that are taken into account for the calculation of the average specific emissions of co2 listed in column d resulting from the use of innovative technologies that make a verified contribution to co2 reductions and that have been approved by the commission in accordance with article 12 of regulation (ec) no 443/2009. column j: average co2 emissions (100 %) means the average specific emissions of co2 that have been calculated on the basis of 100 % of the vehicles attributed to the manufacturer. where appropriate, the average specific emissions of co2 take into account the errors notified to the commission by the manufacturer concerned. the records used for the calculation includes those that contain a valid value for mass and co2 emission but exclude emission reductions resulting from innovative technologies referred to in article 12 of regulation (ec) no 443/2009. (1) the data for the vw group pc pool cannot be confirmed or amended for calendar year 2017. (2) commission regulation (eu) no 1014/2010 of 10 november 2010 on monitoring and reporting of data on the registration of new passenger cars pursuant to regulation (ec) no 443/2009 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 293, 11.11.2010, p. 15). annex ii table 1 values relating to the performance of manufacturers which are members of the pool vw group pc confirmed or amended in accordance with the second subparagraph of article 8(5) of regulation (ec) no 443/2009 for calendar year 2016 a b c d e f g h i manufacturer name pools and derogations number of registrations average specific emissions of co2 (100 %) specific emissions target distance to target distance to target adjusted average mass average co2 emissions (100 %) audi ag p14 783 896 124,968 138,723 13,755 14,046 1 583,27 124,968 audi hungaria motor kft p14 9 950 144,517 130,000 14,517 14,017 1 392,40 144,517 bugatti automobiles sas p14 7 568,143 157,376 410,767 396,747 1 991,43 568,143 quattro gmbh p14 9 275 214,612 147,126 67,486 67,465 1 767,14 214,612 seat sa p14 340 155 115,849 123,936 8,087 8,088 1 259,70 115,849 skoda auto as p14 627 533 111,894 124,918 13,024 13,189 1 281,20 111,894 volkswagen ag p14 1 651 339 118,551 130,216 11,665 11,754 1 397,13 118,551 table 2 values relating to the performance of manufacturers which are members of the pool vw group pc confirmed or amended in accordance with the second subparagraph of article 8(5) of regulation (ec) no 443/2009 for calendar year 2015 a b c d e f g h i manufacturer name pools and derogations number of registrations average specific emissions of co2 (100 %) specific emissions target distance to target distance to target adjusted average mass average co2 emissions (100 %) audi ag p14 717 933 126,245 139,941 13,696 13,696 1 589,53 126,834 audi hungaria motor kft p14 11 710 142,770 131,387 11,383 11,383 1 402,36 142,770 bugatti automobiles sas p14 7 541,857 160,959 380,898 380,898 2 049,43 541,857 quattro gmbh p14 6 313 224,593 149,793 74,800 74,800 1 805,11 224,593 seat sa p14 332 980 116,577 124,324 7,747 7,747 1 247,79 116,577 skoda auto as p14 585 553 115,511 125,552 10,041 10,041 1 274,68 115,511 volkswagen ag p14 1 655 305 118,259 130,864 12,605 12,605 1 390,90 118,853 table 3 values relating to the performance of manufacturers which are members of the pool vw group pc confirmed or amended in accordance with the second subparagraph of article 8(5) of regulation (ec) no 443/2009 for calendar year 2014 a b c d e f g h i manufacturer name pools and derogations number of registrations average co2 (80 %) corrected specific emissions target distance to target distance to target adjusted average mass average co2 (100 %) audi ag p12 683 752 121,362 138,499 17,137 17,137 1 557,98 131,253 audi hungaria motor kft p12 5 018 145,034 131,858 13,176 13,176 1 412,66 151,730 bentley motors ltd p12 2 249 285,434 181,668 103,766 103,670 2 502,60 301,128 bugatti automobiles sas p12 17 552,846 160,388 392,458 392,458 2 036,94 558,647 automobili lamborghini spa p12 510 317,490 144,398 173,092 173,092 1 687,06 328,422 quattro gmbh p12 4 874 225,943 153,011 72,932 72,932 1 875,52 236,635 seat sa p12 316 545 110,877 124,039 13,162 13,164 1 241,57 117,265 skoda auto as p12 546 133 114,628 125,591 10,963 11,034 1 275,52 120,968 volkswagen ag p12 1 549 589 113,030 130,532 17,502 17,605 1 383,64 123,868 explanatory notes to tables 1, 2, 3: column a: manufacturer name means the name of the manufacturer as notified to the commission by the manufacturer concerned or, where no such notification has taken place, the name registered by the registration authority of the member state. column b: the manufacturer is a member of the vw group pc pool (p12 or p14) formed pursuant to article 7 of regulation (ec) no 443/2009 and the pooling agreement is valid for the calendar years 2014, 2015 and 2016. the provisional data for the vw group pc pool can however not be confirmed or amended for any of those calendar years. column c: number of registrations means the total number of new cars registered by member states in a calendar year, not counting those registrations that relate to records where the values for mass and/or co2 are missing and those records which the manufacturer does not recognise. the number of registrations reported by member states may otherwise not be changed. column d: tables 1, 2 and 3: average specific emissions of co2 (100 %) means the average specific emissions of co2 (g co2/km) that have been calculated on the basis of 100 % of the vehicles attributed to the manufacturer. where appropriate, the average specific emissions of co2 take into account the errors notified to the commission by the manufacturer concerned. the records used for the calculation includes those that contain a valid value for mass and co2 emissions. the average specific emissions of co2 include emission reductions resulting from the use of innovative technologies referred to in article 12 of regulation (ec) no 443/2009, and in tables 2 and 3 emission reductions resulting from the provisions on super credits in article 5 of regulation (ec) no 443/2009 and the use of e85 in accordance with article 6 of that regulation. table 3: average co2 (80 %) corrected means the average specific emissions of co2 that have been calculated on the basis of the 80 % lowest emitting vehicles in the manufacturer's fleet in accordance with the third indent of the second paragraph of article 4 of regulation (ec) no 443/2009 and point 4 of commission communication com(2010) 657 final (1). column e: specific emissions target means the emissions target calculated on the basis of the average mass of all vehicles attributed to a manufacturer applying the formula set out in annex i to regulation (ec) no 443/2009. column f: distance to target means the difference between the average specific emissions of co2 specified in column d and the specific emissions target in column e. where the value in column f is positive the average specific emissions of co2 exceed the specific emissions target. column g: distance to target adjusted means that where the values in this column are different from those in column f, the values in that column have been adjusted to take into account an error margin. the error margin only applies if the manufacturer has notified the commission of records with the error code b as set out in article 9(3) of regulation (eu) no 1014/2010. the error margin is calculated in accordance with the following formula: error = absolute value of [(ac1 tg1) (ac2 tg2)] ac1= the average specific emissions of co2 including the unidentifiable vehicles (as set out in column d); tg1= the specific emissions target including the unidentifiable vehicles (as set out in column e); ac2= the average specific emissions of co2 excluding the unidentifiable vehicles; tg2= the specific emissions target excluding the unidentifiable vehicles. column h: average mass means the average of the mass in running order (kilogrammes) of the vehicles attributed to the manufacturer. column i: tables 1, 2 and 3: average co2 emissions (100 %) means the average specific emissions of co2 that have been calculated on the basis of 100 % of the vehicles attributed to the manufacturer. where appropriate, the average specific emissions of co2 take into account the errors notified to the commission by the manufacturer concerned. the records used for the calculation include those that contain a valid value for mass and co2 emission but exclude emission reductions resulting from innovative technologies referred to in article 12 of regulation (ec) no 443/2009. for the calendar years 2014 and 2015 (tables 2 and 3) the emission reductions resulting from the provisions on super-credits in article 5 of regulation (ec) no 443/2009 and on the use of e85 in article 6 of that regulation are also excluded from the calculation. (1) communication from the commission of 10 november 2010 on the monitoring of data on the registration of new passenger cars (com(2010) 657 final).

name: council decision (eu) 2019/577 of 8 april 2019 appointing an alternate member, proposed by the republic of cyprus, of the committee of the regions type: decision subject matter: eu institutions and european civil service; europe date published: 2019-04-11 11.4.2019 en official journal of the european union l 100/42 council decision (eu) 2019/577 of 8 april 2019 appointing an alternate member, proposed by the republic of cyprus, of the committee of the regions the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 305 thereof, having regard to the proposal of the government of cyprus, whereas: (1) on 26 january 2015, 5 february 2015 and 23 june 2015, the council adopted decisions (eu) 2015/116 (1), (eu) 2015/190 (2) and (eu) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the committee of the regions for the period from 26 january 2015 to 25 january 2020. on 26 july 2016, by council decision (eu) 2016/1233 (4), mr kyriakos chatzittofis was replaced by mr stavros yerolatsites as an alternate member. on 5 may 2017, by council decision (eu) 2017/799 (5), mr stavros yerolatsites was replaced by mr kyprianos andronikou as an alternate member. (2) an alternate member's seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of mr kyprianos andronikou, has adopted this decision: article 1 the following is hereby appointed as an alternate member of the committee of the regions for the remainder of the current term of office: mr kyriacos xydias, mayor of yermasoyia municipality. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at luxembourg, 8 april 2019. for the council the president f. mogherini (1) council decision (eu) 2015/116 of 26 january 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the committee of the regions for the period from 26 january 2015 to 25 january 2020 (oj l 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42). (2) council decision (eu) 2015/190 of 5 february 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the committee of the regions for the period from 26 january 2015 to 25 january 2020 (oj l 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25). (3) council decision (eu) 2015/994 of 23 june 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the committee of the regions for the period from 26 january 2015 to 25 january 2020 (oj l 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70). (4) council decision (eu) 2016/1233 of 26 july 2016 appointing a member and an alternate member, proposed by the republic of cyprus, of the committee of the regions (oj l 202, 28.7.2016, p. 41). (5) council decision (eu) 2017/799 of 5 may 2017 appointing three members and two alternate members, proposed by the republic of cyprus, of the committee of the regions (oj l 120, 11.5.2017, p. 20).

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/582 of 3 april 2019 confirming or amending the provisional calculation of the average specific emissions of co2 and specific emissions targets for manufacturers of new light commercial vehicles for the calendar year 2017 and for the volkswagen pool including its members for the calendar years 2014, 2015 and 2016 pursuant to regulation (eu) no 510/2011 of the european parliament and of the council (notified under document c(2019) 2342) (text with eea relevance.) type: decision_impl subject matter: technology and technical regulations; environmental policy; deterioration of the environment; mechanical engineering; land transport date published: 2019-04-11 11.4.2019 en official journal of the european union l 100/47 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/582 of 3 april 2019 confirming or amending the provisional calculation of the average specific emissions of co2 and specific emissions targets for manufacturers of new light commercial vehicles for the calendar year 2017 and for the volkswagen pool including its members for the calendar years 2014, 2015 and 2016 pursuant to regulation (eu) no 510/2011 of the european parliament and of the council (notified under document c(2019) 2342) (only the czech, dutch, english, estonian, french, german, hungarian, italian, and swedish texts are authentic) (text with eea relevance) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to regulation (eu) no 510/2011 of the european parliament and of the council of 11 may 2011 setting emission performance standards for new light commercial vehicles as part of the union's integrated approach to reduce co2 emissions from light-duty vehicles (1), and in particular article 8(6) thereof, whereas: (1) in accordance with regulation (eu) no 510/2011, the commission is required to calculate each year the average specific emissions of co2 and the specific emissions target for each manufacturer of light commercial vehicles in the union. on the basis of that calculation, the commission is to determine whether manufacturers and pools of manufacturers have complied with their specific emissions targets. (2) the detailed data to be used for the calculation of the average specific emissions and the specific emissions targets are based on member states' registrations of new light commercial vehicles during the preceding calendar year. where light commercial vehicles are type-approved in a multi-stage process, the manufacturer of the base vehicle take responsibility for the co2 emissions of the completed vehicle. (3) all member states submitted the 2017 data the commission in accordance with article 8(2) of regulation (eu) no 510/2011. where, as a result of the verification of the data by the commission, it was evident that certain data were missing or manifestly incorrect, the commission contacted the member states concerned and, subject to the agreement of those member states, adjusted or completed the data accordingly. where no agreement could be reached with a member state, the provisional data of that member state were not adjusted. (4) on 17 may 2018, the commission published the provisional data and notified 65 manufacturers of the provisional calculations of their average specific emissions of co2 and their specific emissions targets in 2017. manufacturers were asked to verify the data and to notify the commission of any errors within three months of receipt of the notification. 23 manufacturers submitted notifications of errors. (5) for the remaining 42 manufacturers that did not notify any errors in the datasets or respond otherwise, the provisional data and provisional calculations of the average specific emissions and the specific emissions targets should be confirmed. (6) the commission has verified the errors notified by the manufacturers and the respective reasons for their correction and the dataset has been confirmed or amended. (7) in the case of records without matching vehicle identification numbers and with missing or incorrect identification parameters, such as type, variant, version code or type-approval number, the fact that manufacturers cannot verify or correct those records should be taken into account. as a consequence, it is appropriate to apply an error margin to the co2 emissions and mass values in those records. (8) the error margin should be calculated as the difference between the distances to the specific emissions target expressed as the specific emissions targets subtracted from the average specific emissions calculated including and excluding those registrations that cannot be verified by the manufacturers. regardless of whether that difference is positive or negative, the error margin should always improve the manufacturer's position with regard to its specific emissions target. (9) in accordance with article 10(2) of regulation (eu) no 510/2011, a manufacturer should be considered as compliant with its specific emissions target referred to in article 4 of that regulation where the average emissions indicated in this decision are lower than the specific emissions target, expressed as a negative distance to target. where the average emissions exceed the specific emissions target, an excess emission premium is to be imposed, unless the manufacturer concerned benefits from an exemption from that target or is a member of a pool and the pool complies with its specific emissions target. (10) on 3 november 2015 the volkswagen group made a statement to the effect that irregularities had been found when determining type approval co2 levels of some of their vehicles. following a thorough investigation, sufficient clarifications have been obtained for confirming or amending the provisional data for the volkswagen pool and its members audi ag, dr ing. h.c.f. porsche ag, quattro gmbh, seat s.a., skoda auto a.s., and volkswagen ag for the calendar years 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017. (11) the values relating to the performance of a manufacturer as confirmed or amended by this decision could be revised in the event that the relevant national authorities confirm the existence of irregularities in the co2 emission values provided for the purpose of determining the manufacturer's compliance with the specific emissions target, has adopted this decision: article 1 1. the values relating to the performance of manufacturers, as confirmed or amended for each manufacturer of light commercial vehicles and for each pool of manufacturers of light commercial vehicles in respect of the 2017 calendar year are specified in annex i. 2. the values relating to the performance of the volkswagen pool and its members audi ag, dr ing. h.c.f. porsche ag, quattro gmbh, seat s.a., skoda auto a.s., and volkswagen ag, as confirmed or amended in respect of the calendar years 2014, 2015 and 2016 are specified in annex ii to this decision. article 2 this decision is addressed to the following individual manufacturers and pools formed in accordance with article 7 of regulation (eu) no 510/2011: (1) alfa romeo s.p.a. c.so settembrini, 40 gate 8 building 6 1st floor b15n colonna n47 10135 torino italy (2) alke srl via vigonovese 123 35127 padova italy (3) audi ag letter box 011/1882 38436 wolfsburg germany (4) automobiles citroen 7, rue henri sainte-claire deville 92500 rueil-malmaison france (5) automobiles peugeot 7, rue henri sainte-claire deville 92500 rueil-malmaison france (6) avtovaz jsc represented in the union by: cs atuolada 211 konevova 130 00 prague 3 czech republic (7) bluecar sas 31-32 quai de dion bouton 92800 puteaux france (8) bayerische motoren werke ag petuelring 130 80788 m nchen germany (9) bmw m gmbh petuelring 130 80788 m nchen germany (10) fca us llc represented in the union by: fiat chrysler automobiles gate 8 building 6 1st floor b15n colonna n47 c.so settembrini, 40 10135 torino italy (11) automobile dacia sa guyancourt 1 avenue du golf 78288 guyancourt cedex france (12) daimler ag f403 ea/r 70546 stuttgart germany (13) dfsk motor co., ltd. represented in the union by: giotti victoria srl sr.l. pissana road 11/a 50021 barberino val d'elsa (florence) italy (14) esagono energia s.r.l. via puecher 9 20060 pozzuolo martesana (mi) italy (15) fca italy s.p.a. gate 8 building 6 1st floor b15n colonna n47 c.so settembrini, 40 10135 torino italy (16) ford motor company of australia ltd represented in the union by: ford werke gmbh niehl plant, building imbert 479 henry-ford-stra e 1 50735 k ln germany (17) ford motor company niehl plant, building imbert 479 henry-ford-stra e 1 50735 k ln germany (18) ford werke gmbh niehl plant, building imbert 479 henry-ford-stra e 1 50735 k ln germany (19) mitsubishi fuso truck & bus corporation represented in the union by: daimler ag f403 ea/r 70546 stuttgart germany (20) mitsubishi fuso truck europe sa represented in the union by: daimler ag f403 ea/r 70546 stuttgart germany (21) llc automobile plant gaz poe 2 l hte tartumaa 60502 estonia (22) general motors holdings llc represented in the union by: adam opel gmbh bahnhofsplatz 1 ipc 39-12 65423 r sselsheim germany (23) gac gonow auto co. ltd represented in the union by: autorimessa monte mario srl via della muratella, 797 00054 maccarese (rm) italy (24) goupil industrie s.a. route de villeneuve 47320 bourran france (25) great wall motor company ltd represented in the union by: great wall motor europe technical center gmbh otto-hahn-str. 5 63128 dietzenbach germany (26) honda motor co., ltd represented in the union by: honda motor europe ltd cain road bracknell berkshire rg12 1hl united kingdom (27) honda of the uk manufacturing ltd honda motor europe ltd cain road bracknell berkshire rg12 1hl united kingdom (28) hyundai motor company represented in the union by: hyundai motor europe gmbh kaiserleipromenade 5 63067 offenbach germany (29) hyundai assan otomotiv sanayi ve ticaret a.s. represented in the union by: hyundai motor europe gmbh kaiserleipromenade 5 63067 offenbach germany (30) hyundai motor manufacturing czech s.r.o. kaiserleipromenade 5 63067 offenbach germany (31) isuzu motors limited represented in the union by: isuzu motors europe nv bist 12 2630 aartselaar belgium (32) iveco s.p.a. via puglia 35 10156 torino italia (33) jaguar land rover limited abbey road whitley coventry cv3 4lf united kingdom (34) kia motors corporation represented in the union by: kia motors europe gmbh theodor-heuss-allee 11 60486 frankfurt am main germany (35) kia motors slovakia s.r.o. theodor-heuss-allee 11 60486 frankfurt am main germany (36) lada automobile gmbh erlengrund 7-11 21614 buxtehude germany (37) magyar suzuki corporation ltd 2500 esztergom schweidel jozsef u52 hungary (38) mahindra & mahindra ltd represented in the union by: mahindra europe s.r.l. via cancelliera 35 00040 ariccia (roma) italy (39) man truck & bus ag letter box 011/1882 38436 wolfsburg germany (40) mazda motor corporation represented in the union by: mazda motor europe gmbh european r & d centre hiroshimastr 1 d-61440 oberursel/ts germany (41) m.f.t.b.c. represented in the union by: daimler ag f403 ea/r 70546 stuttgart germany (42) mitsubishi motors corporation mmc represented in the union by: mitsubishi motors europe b.v. mme mitsubishi avenue 21 6121 sg born the netherlands (43) mitsubishi motors europe b.v. mme mitsubishi avenue 21 6121 sh born the netherlands (44) mitsubishi motors thailand co., ltd mmth represented in the union by: mitsubishi motors europe bv mme mitsubishi avenue 21 6121 sg born the netherlands (45) nissan international sa represented in the union by: renault nissan representation office av des arts 40 1040 bruxelles belgium (46) adam opel gmbh bahnhofsplatz 1 ipc 39-12 65423 r sselsheim germany (47) opel automobile gmbh bahnhofsplatz 1ipc 39-12 65423 r sselsheim germany (48) dr ing hc f porsche ag letter box 011/1882 38436 wolfsburg germany (49) piaggio & c s.p.a. viale rinaldo piaggio 25 56025 pontedera (pi) italy (50) renault s.a.s. guyancourt 1 avenue du golf 78288 guyancourt cedex france (51) renault trucks 99 route de lyon ter l10 0 01 69802 saint priest cedex france (52) romanital srl via delle industrie, 107 90040 isola delle femmine pa italy (53) saic maxus automotive co. ltd represented in the union by: saic luc, s.a.r.l. president building 37a avenue j.f. kennedy 1855 luxembourg luxembourg (54) seat sa letter box 011/1882 38436 wolfsburg germany (55) sfl technologies gmbh innovationspark 2 8152 stallhofen austria (56) skoda auto as letter box 011/1882 38436 wolfsburg germany (57) ssangyong motor company represented in the union by: ssangyong motor europe office herriotstrasse 1 60528 frankfurt am main germany (58) streetscooter gmbh j licher stra e 191 52070 aachen germany (59) subaru corporation represented in the union by: subaru europe nv/sa leuvensesteenweg 555 b/8 1930 zaventem belgium (60) suzuki motor corporation represented in the union by: magyar suzuki corporation ltd 2500 esztergom schweidel jozsef u52 hungary (61) tesla motors ltd represented in the union by: tesla motors nl 7-9 atlasstraat 5047 rg tilburg the netherlands (62) toyota motor europe nv/sa avenue du bourget 60 1140 brussels belgium (63) univers ve helem 14 rue federico garcia lorca 32000 auch france (64) volkswagen ag letter box 011/1882 38436 wolfsburg germany (65) volvo car corporation vak building assar gabrielssons v g se-405 31 g teborg sweden (66) pool for: daimler ag f403 ea/r 70546 stuttgart germany (67) pool for: fca italy s.p.a. gate 8 building 6 1st floor b15n colonna n47 c.so settembrini, 40 10135 torino italy (68) pool for: ford-werke gmbh neihl plant, building imbert 479 henry-ford-stra e 1 50735 k ln germany (69) pool for: general motors bahnhofsplatz 1 ipc 39-12 65423 r sselsheim germany (70) pool for: hyundai kaiserleipromanade 5 63067 offenbach germany (71) pool for: kia theodor-heuss-allee 11 60486 frankfurt am main germany (72) pool for: mitsubishi motors mitsubishi avenue 21 6121 sg born the netherlands (73) pool for: renault 1 avenue du golf 78288 guyancourt cedex france (74) pool for: volkswagen group lcv letter box 011/1882 38436 wolfsburg germany done at brussels, 3 april 2019. for the commission miguel arias ca ete member of the commission (1) oj l 145, 31.5.2011, p. 1. annex i table 1 values relating to the performance of manufacturers confirmed or amended in accordance with article 8(6) of regulation (eu) no 510/2011 for calendar year 2017 a b c d e f g h i manufacturer name pools and derogations number of registrations average specific emissions of co2 (100 %) specific emissions target distance to target distance to target adjusted average mass average co2 emissions (100 %) alfa romeo spa 8 137,375 161,283 23,908 23,908 1 558,50 137,375 alke srl dmd 1 0,000 1 030,00 0,000 audi ag p8 1 275 133,705 179,293 45,588 45,588 1 752,16 133,773 automobiles citroen 158 465 130,881 167,142 36,261 36,261 1 621,51 131,273 automobiles peugeot 169 852 132,590 169,521 36,931 36,931 1 647,09 133,040 avtovaz jsc p7 272 215,967 135,884 80,083 80,013 1 285,40 215,967 bluecar sas dmd 21 0,000 1 325,00 0,000 bayerische motoren werke ag dmd 94 150,979 1 870,16 150,979 bmw m gmbh dmd 411 146,029 1 904,06 146,029 fca us llc p2 157 220,541 201,360 19,181 19,181 1 989,44 220,541 automobile dacia sa p7 26 775 117,858 135,230 17,372 17,372 1 278,37 117,858 daimler ag p1 147 953 187,603 212,680 25,079 25,079 2 111,16 187,604 dfsk motor co ltd dmd 353 179,759 1 243,27 179,759 esagono energia srl dmd 19 0,000 1 225,74 0,000 fca italy spa p2 143 889 149,154 174,813 25,659 25,659 1 703,99 149,154 ford motor company of australia limited p3 38 381 214,276 227,258 12,982 12,982 2 267,91 214,276 ford motor company p3 9 159,111 199,459 40,348 40,348 1 969,00 159,111 ford-werke gmbh p3 242 012 156,630 193,916 37,286 37,286 1 909,40 156,630 mitsubishi fuso truck & bus corporation p1 446 242,807 264,642 21,835 21,835 2 669,89 242,807 mitsubishi fuso truck europe sa p1 31 236,806 274,345 37,539 37,539 2 774,23 236,806 llc automobile plant gaz dmd 37 285,000 2 256,89 285,000 general motors holdings llc p4 344 163,282 178,428 15,146 15,146 1 742,86 163,282 gonow auto co ltd dmd 51 184,647 1 358,33 184,647 goupil industrie sa dmd 349 0,000 1 123,89 0,000 great wall motor company limited dmd 57 202,439 1 771,93 202,439 honda motor co ltd dmd 14 112,571 1 335,21 112,571 honda of the uk manufacturing ltd dmd 21 141,429 1 660,14 141,429 hyundai motor company p9 2 775 209,458 223,768 14,310 14,310 2 230,39 209,458 hyundai assan otomotiv sanayi ve p9 1 112,000 122,176 10,176 10,176 1 138,00 112,000 hyundai motor manufacturing czech sro p9 83 111,590 147,043 35,453 35,453 1 405,39 111,590 isuzu motors limited 9 887 195,044 204,716 9,672 9,672 2 025,53 195,044 iveco spa 23 369 203,007 239,767 36,760 36,760 2 402,42 203,020 jaguar land rover limited dmd 387 157,755 1 995,43 157,755 kia motors corporation p5 1 295 124,415 155,643 31,228 31,228 1 497,86 124,511 kia motors slovakia sro p5 312 124,160 150,401 26,241 26,241 1 441,49 124,160 lada automobile gmbh dmd 3 216,000 1 285,00 216,000 magyar suzuki corporation ltd dmd 2 115,000 1 370,00 115,000 mahindra & mahindra ltd dmd 310 210,958 1 973,90 210,958 man truck & bus ag p8 1 485 197,790 220,221 22,431 22,438 2 192,25 197,790 mazda motor corporation dmd 105 136,905 1 546,78 136,905 mftbc p1 36 239,250 265,401 26,151 26,151 2 678,05 239,250 mitsubishi motors corporation mmc p6/d 330 184,176 195,000 10,824 10,824 1 887,06 184,176 mitsubishi motors europe bv mme p6/d 205 217,210 195,000 22,210 22,210 2 217,08 217,210 mitsubishi motors thailand co ltd mmth p6/d 20 576 185,501 195,000 9,499 9,499 1 895,76 185,501 nissan international sa 55 137 158,636 191,852 33,216 33,216 1 887,20 162,648 adam opel gmbh p4 65 538 159,798 180,693 20,895 20,895 1 767,22 159,798 opel automobile gmbh 17 373 168,923 189,777 20,854 20,854 1 864,89 168,923 piaggio & c spa d 2 980 151,640 155,000 3,360 3,360 1 087,29 153,319 dr ing hcf porsche ag p8 53 186,774 206,254 19,480 19,480 2 042,06 186,774 renault sas p7 223 583 149,683 177,514 27,831 27,832 1 733,03 151,064 renault trucks 9 126 208,652 229,287 20,635 20,635 2 289,73 208,652 romanital srl dmd 48 166,354 1 272,60 166,354 saic maxus automotive co ltd dmd 159 231,595 2 200,75 237,421 seat sa p8 354 109,263 128,576 19,313 19,315 1 206,82 109,263 sfl technologies gmbh dmd 5 0,000 1 631,40 0,000 skoda auto as p8 4 209 110,631 133,165 22,534 22,548 1 256,16 110,631 ssangyong motor company d 1 000 192,914 210,000 17,086 17,086 2 071,59 192,914 streetscooter gmbh 3 808 0,000 159,554 159,554 159,554 1 539,91 0,000 subaru corporation dmd 52 161,192 1 643,60 161,192 suzuki motor corporation dmd 14 162,714 1 132,14 162,714 tesla motors ltd dmd 1 0,000 2 427,00 0,000 toyota motor europe nv sa 38 266 168,452 196,264 27,812 27,990 1 934,64 168,452 univers ve helem dmd 5 0,000 1 138,40 0,000 volkswagen ag p8 192 470 159,987 189,446 29,459 29,502 1 861,33 160,011 volvo car corporation dmd 852 121,619 1 691,41 121,964 table 2 values relating to the performance of pools confirmed or amended in accordance with article 8(6) of regulation (eu) no 510/2011 for calendar year 2017 a b c d e f g h i pool name pool number of registrations average specific emissions of co2 (100 % specific emissions target distance to target distance to target adjusted average mass average co2 emissions (100 %) daimler ag p1 148 466 187,791 212,862 25,072 25,072 2 113,12 187,793 fca italy spa p2 144 046 149,232 174,842 25,610 25,610 1 704,3 149,232 ford-werke gmbh p3 280 402 164,521 198,481 33,960 33,960 1 958,48 164,521 general motors p4 65 882 159,816 180,681 20,865 20,865 1 767,09 159,816 hyundai p9 2 859 206,583 221,506 14,923 14,923 2 206,06 206,583 kia p5 1 607 124,366 154,625 30,259 30,259 1 486,91 124,443 mitsubishi motors p6/d 21 111 185,788 195,000 9,212 9,212 1 898,74 185,788 renault p7 250 630 146,382 172,951 26,569 26,570 1 683,97 147,587 vw group pc p8 199 846 158,978 188,321 29,343 29,385 1 849,24 159,002 explanatory notes to tables 1 and 2: column a: table 1: manufacturer name means the name of the manufacturer as notified to the commission by the manufacturer concerned or, where no such notification has taken place, the name registered by the registration authority of the member state. table 2: pool name means the name of the pool declared by the pool manager. column b: d means that a derogation relating to a small volume manufacturer has been granted in accordance with article 11(3) of regulation (eu) no 510/2011 for the calendar year 2017. dmd means that a de minimis exemption applies in accordance with article 2(4) of regulation (eu) no 510/2011, i.e., a manufacturer which together with all its connected undertakings was responsible for fewer than 1 000 new registered vehicles in 2017 does not have to meet a specific emissions target. p means that the manufacturer is a member of a pool (listed in table 2) formed pursuant to article 7 of regulation (eu) no 510/2011 and the pooling agreement is valid for the calendar year 2017. column c: number of registrations means the total number of new light commercial vehicles registered by member states in a calendar year, not counting those registrations that relate to records where the values for mass or co2 are missing and those records which the manufacturer does not recognise. the number of registrations reported by member states may otherwise not be changed. column d: average specific emissions of co2 (100 %) means the average specific emissions of co2 (g co2/km) that have been calculated on the basis of the 100 % of the vehicles attributed to the manufacturer. where appropriate, the average specific emissions of co2 take into account the errors notified to the commission by the manufacturer concerned. the records used for the calculation include those that contain a valid value for mass and co2 emissions. the average specific emissions of co2 include emission reductions resulting from the provisions on super-credits in article 5 of regulation (eu) no 510/2011. column e: specific emissions target means the emissions target calculated on the basis of the average mass of all vehicles attributed to a manufacturer applying the formula set out in annex i to regulation (eu) no 510/2011. column f: distance to target means the difference between the average specific emissions of co2 specified in column d and the specific emissions target in column e. where the value in column f is positive, the average specific emissions of co2 exceed the specific emissions target. column g: distance to target adjusted means that where the values in this column are different from those in column f, the values in that column have been adjusted to take into account an error margin. the error margin is calculated in accordance with the following formula: error = absolute value of [(ac1 tg1) (ac2 tg2)] ac1= the average specific emissions of co2 including the unidentifiable vehicles (as set out in column d); tg1= the specific emissions target including the unidentifiable vehicles (as set out in column e); ac2= the average specific emissions of co2 excluding the unidentifiable vehicles; tg2= the specific emissions target excluding the unidentifiable vehicles. column h: average mass means the average of the mass in running order (kilogrammes) of the vehicles attributed to the manufacturer. column i: average co2 emissions (100 %) means the average specific emissions of co2 that have been calculated on the basis of 100 % of the vehicles attributed to the manufacturer. where appropriate, the average specific emissions of co2 take into account the errors notified to the commission by the manufacturer concerned. the records used for the calculation include those that contain a valid value for mass and co2 emissions but exclude emission reductions resulting from the provisions on super-credits in article 5 of regulation (eu) no 510/2011. annex ii table 1 values relating to the performance of manufacturers which are members of the pool volkswagen group lcv confirmed or amended in accordance with article 8(6) of regulation (eu) no 510/2011 for calendar year 2016 a b c d e f g h i manufacturer name pools and derogations number of registrations average specific emissions of co2 (80 %) specific emissions target distance to target distance to target adjusted average mass average co2 emissions (100 %) audi ag p9 610 137,399 191,687 54,288 54,288 1 885,43 144,943 dr ing hcf porsche ag p9 96 180,487 210,465 29,978 29,978 2 087,34 189,656 quattro gmbh p9 2 189,000 166,072 22,928 22,928 1 610,00 189,000 seat sa p9 952 103,075 126,562 23,487 23,487 1 185,16 107,797 skoda auto as p9 5 188 103,349 130,968 27,619 27,619 1 232,54 108,373 volkswagen ag p9 190 987 152,518 183,040 30,522 30,571 1 792,45 165,863 table 2 values relating to the performance of the pool volkswagen group lcv confirmed or amended in accordance with article 8(6) of regulation (eu) no 510/2011 for calendar year 2016 a b c d e f g h i pool name pool number of registrations average specific emissions of co2 (80 %) specific emissions target distance to target distance to target adjusted average mass average co2 emissions (100 %) volkswagen group lcv p9 197 835 150,346 181,442 31,096 31,153 1 775,27 164,024 table 3 values relating to the performance of manufacturers which are members of the pool volkswagen group lcv confirmed or amended in accordance with article 8(6) of regulation (eu) no 510/2011 for calendar year 2015 a b c d e f g h i manufacturer name pools and derogations number of registrations average specific emissions of co2 (75 %) specific emissions target distance to target distance to target adjusted average mass average co2 emissions (100 %) audi ag p8 940 128,279 177,884 49,605 49,605 1 737,01 140,181 dr ing hcf porsche ag p8 115 181,209 215,896 34,687 34,687 2 145,74 192,417 quattro gmbh p8 5 223,000 204,667 18,333 18,333 2 025,00 223,000 seat sa p8 1 264 99,069 126,760 27,691 27,691 1 187,29 104,435 skoda auto as p8 5 458 110,886 133,291 22,405 22,422 1 257,52 118,741 volkswagen ag p8 168 339 167,921 188,905 20,984 20,984 1 855,52 181,173 table 4 values relating to the performance of the pool volkswagen group lcv confirmed or amended in accordance with article 8(6) of regulation (eu) no 510/2011 for calendar year 2015 a b c d e f g h i pool name pool number of registrations average specific emissions of co2 (75 %) specific emissions target distance to target distance to target adjusted average mass average co2 emissions (100 %) volkswagen group lcv p8 176 121 164,509 186,696 22,187 22,190 1 831,76 178,477 table 5 values relating to the performance of manufacturers which are members of the pool volkswagen group lcv confirmed or amended in accordance with article 8(6) of regulation (eu) no 510/2011 for calendar year 2014 a b c d e f g h i manufacturer name pools and derogations number of registrations average specific emissions of co2 (70 %) specific emissions target distance to target distance to target adjusted average mass average co2 emissions (100 %) audi ag p8 2 653 137,151 175,118 37,967 37,967 1 707,27 147,383 dr ing hcf porsche ag p8 216 191,166 218,989 27,823 27,823 2 179,00 203,032 quattro gmbh p8 12 231,500 197,847 33,653 33,653 1 951,67 237,333 seat sa p8 1 530 98,730 127,899 29,169 29,169 1 199,54 104,810 skoda auto as p8 9 409 115,061 137,318 22,257 22,427 1 300,82 124,157 volkswagen ag p8 185 710 164,086 185,477 21,391 21,391 1 818,66 179,637 table 6 values relating to the performance of the pool volkswagen group lcv confirmed or amended in accordance with article 8(6) of regulation (eu) no 510/2011 for calendar year 2014 a b c d e f g h i pool name pool number of registrations average specific emissions of co2 (70 %) specific emissions target distance to target distance to target adjusted average mass average co2 emissions (100 %) volkswagen group lcv p8 199 530 159,447 182,664 23,217 23,218 1 788,41 176,047 explanatory notes to tables 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6: column a: table 1, 3, 5: manufacturer name means the name of the manufacturer as notified to the commission by the manufacturer concerned or, where no such notification has taken place, the name registered by the registration authority of the member state. table 2, 4, 6: pool name means the name of the pool declared by the pool manager. column b: p means that the manufacturer is a member of a pool formed pursuant to article 7 of regulation (eu) no 510/2011 and the pooling agreement is valid for that calendar year. column c: number of registrations means the total number of new light commercial vehicles registered by member states in a calendar year, not counting those registrations that relate to records where the values for mass or co2 are missing and those records which the manufacturer does not recognise. the number of registrations reported by member states may otherwise not be changed. column d: table 1, 2: average specific emissions of co2 (80 %) means the average specific emissions of co2 that have been calculated on the basis of the 80 % lowest emitting vehicles in the manufacturer's fleet in accordance with the third paragraph of article 4 of regulation (eu) no 510/2011. where appropriate, the average specific emissions of co2 take into account the errors notified to the commission by the manufacturer concerned. the records used for the calculation include those that contain a valid value for mass and co2 emissions. the average specific emissions of co2 include emission reductions resulting from the provisions on super-credits in article 5 of regulation (eu) no 510/2011 or eco-innovations in article 12 of that regulation. table 3, 4: average specific emissions of co2 (75 %) means the average specific emissions of co2 that have been calculated on the basis of the 75 % lowest emitting vehicles in the manufacturer's fleet in accordance with the third paragraph of article 4 of regulation (eu) no 510/2011. where appropriate, the average specific emissions of co2 take into account the errors notified to the commission by the manufacturer concerned. the records used for the calculation include those that contain a valid value for mass and co2 emissions. the average specific emissions of co2 include emission reductions resulting from the provisions on super-credits in article 5 of regulation (eu) no 510/2011 or eco-innovations in article 12 of that regulation. table 5, 6: average specific emissions of co2 (70 %) means the average specific emissions of co2 (g co2/km) that have been calculated on the basis of the 70 % lowest emitting vehicles in the manufacturer's fleet in accordance with the third paragraph of article 4 of regulation (eu) no 510/2011. where appropriate, the average specific emissions of co2 take into account the errors notified to the commission by the manufacturer concerned. the records used for the calculation include those that contain a valid value for mass and co2 emissions. the average specific emissions of co2 include emission reductions resulting from the provisions on super-credits in article 5 of regulation (eu) no 510/2011. column e: specific emissions target means the emissions target calculated on the basis of the average mass of all vehicles attributed to a manufacturer applying the formula set out in annex i to regulation (eu) no 510/2011. column f: distance to target means the difference between the average specific emissions of co2 specified in column d and the specific emissions target in column e. where the value in column f is positive, the average specific emissions of co2 exceed the specific emissions target. column g: distance to target adjusted means that where the values in this column are different from those in column f, the values in that column have been adjusted to take into account an error margin. the error margin is calculated in accordance with the following formula: error = absolute value of [(ac1 tg1) (ac2 tg2)] ac1= the average specific emissions of co2 including the unidentifiable vehicles (as set out in column d); tg1= the specific emissions target including the unidentifiable vehicles (as set out in column e); ac2= the average specific emissions of co2 excluding the unidentifiable vehicles; tg2= the specific emissions target excluding the unidentifiable vehicles. column h: average mass means the average of the mass in running order (kilogrammes) of the vehicles attributed to the manufacturer. column i: average co2 emissions (100 %) means the average specific emissions of co2 that have been calculated on the basis of 100 % of the vehicles attributed to the manufacturer. where appropriate, the average specific emissions of co2 take into account the errors notified to the commission by the manufacturer concerned. the records used for the calculation include those that contain a valid value for mass and co2 emissions but exclude emission reductions resulting from the provisions on super-credits in article 5 of regulation (eu) no 510/2011.

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/570 of 8 april 2019 laying down rules for the implementation of decision no 1313/2013/eu of the european parliament and of the council as regards resceu capacities and amending commission implementing decision 2014/762/eu (notified under document c(2019) 2644) (text with eea relevance.) type: decision_impl subject matter: cooperation policy; politics and public safety; deterioration of the environment; environmental policy; forestry; economic policy date published: 2019-04-10 10.4.2019 en official journal of the european union l 99/41 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/570 of 8 april 2019 laying down rules for the implementation of decision no 1313/2013/eu of the european parliament and of the council as regards resceu capacities and amending commission implementing decision 2014/762/eu (notified under document c(2019) 2644) (text with eea relevance) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to decision no 1313/2013/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 17 december 2013 on a union civil protection mechanism (1), and in particular article 32(1)(g) thereof, whereas: (1) the union civil protection mechanism (the union mechanism) set out in decision no 1313/2013/eu strengthens cooperation between the union and the member states and facilitates coordination in the field of civil protection in order to improve the union's response to natural and man-made disasters. (2) decision no 1313/2013/eu defines the legal framework of resceu. resceu aims to provide assistance in overwhelming situations where overall existing capacities at national level and those committed by member states to the european civil protection pool are not able to ensure an effective response. (3) in recent years there has been a sharp increase in the number of extreme forest fires in europe with serious economic, environmental and social consequences. in particular, the 2017 and 2018 forest fire seasons demonstrated the need to be prepared when disasters severely and simultaneously affect several member states. (4) the changing nature of the forest fire risk has resulted in proven response capacity gaps at union level. these gaps were particularly evident during the 2017 forest firefighting season when capacities made available via the union mechanism were insufficient to respond to the needs of countries requesting assistance. (5) the initial composition of resceu should therefore be defined with the utmost urgency in accordance with article 12(2) of decision no 1313/2013/eu and should in the first implementing decision include aerial forest firefighting capacities to respond to wild fires. due to the necessary flexibility during the transitional period pursuant to article 35 of decision no 1313/2013/eu, the number of resceu capacities should be indicatively set out in subsequent implementing decisions. (6) in accordance with article 12(4) of decision no 1313/2013/eu, quality requirements for aerial forest firefighting capacities under resceu should be laid down after consultation with member states and should be based on established international standards, where such standards already exist. given the lack of established international standards for aerial forest firefighting capacities, the quality requirements for aerial forest firefighting capacities should be based on the existing general requirements for modules under the european civil protection pool and best practices within the union mechanism. those quality requirements should be laid down in an annex to this decision. (7) for reasons of budgetary discipline, it is necessary to lay down in this decision the costs associated with the union financial support under resceu during the transitional period. (8) in the interest of sound financial management, direct grants for resceu capacities during the transitional period should be awarded on the basis of an annual work programme. (9) with the entry into force on 21 march 2019 of decision (eu) 2019/420 of the european parliament and of the council (2), the rules on addressing temporary shortcomings in extraordinary disasters laid out in commission implementing decision 2014/762/eu (3) have become obsolete. for reasons of consistency, chapter 7 of implementing decision 2014/762/eu should be deleted. (10) the measures provided for in this decision are in accordance with the opinion of the committee referred to in article 33(1) of decision no 1313/2013/eu, has adopted this decision: article 1 subject matter this decision lays down rules for the implementation of decision no 1313/2013/eu as regards: (a) the initial composition of resceu in terms of capacities and its quality requirements; (b) the financing of capacities during the transitional period referred to in article 35 of decision no 1313/2013/eu. article 2 the initial composition of resceu 1. resceu shall consist of aerial forest firefighting capacities. 2. the aerial forest firefighting capacities referred to in paragraph 1 shall include: (a) aerial forest firefighting capacities using airplanes; (b) aerial forest firefighting capacities using helicopters. 3. the quality requirements for the capacities referred to in paragraph 2 are set out in the annex. article 3 financial arrangements for the resceu capacities referred to in article 35 of decision no 1313/2013/eu 1. the commission shall define in the annual work programme the criteria for awarding direct grants to cover the costs referred to in article 35 of decision no 1313/2013/eu which are necessary to ensure rapid access to capacities corresponding to those referred to in article 2. 2. the costs referred to in article 35 of decision no 1313/2013/eu shall include stand-by costs, including if applicable, costs related to maintenance, costs related to staff, costs related to training, including the training of crew and technical staff, costs related to warehousing, costs related to insurance, as well as other costs necessary to ensure the effective availability of such capacities. article 4 amendment to implementing decision 2014/762/eu chapter 7 of implementing decision 2014/762/eu is deleted. article 5 addressees this decision is addressed to the member states. done at brussels, 8 april 2019. for the commission christos stylianides member of the commission (1) oj l 347, 20.12.2013, p. 924. (2) decision (eu) 2019/420 of the european parliament and of the council of 13 march 2019 amending decision no 1313/2013/eu on a union civil protection mechanism (oj l 77 i, 20.3.2019, p. 1). (3) commission implementing decision 2014/762/eu of 16 october 2014 laying down rules for the implementation of decision no 1313/2013/eu of the european parliament and of the council on a union civil protection mechanism and repealing commission decisions 2004/277/ec, euratom and 2007/606/ec, euratom (oj l 320, 6.11.2014, p. 1). annex quality requirements for resceu capacities 1. aerial forest firefighting capacities using airplanes tasks contribute to the extinction of large forest and vegetal fires by performing aerial firefighting. capacities 2 airplanes with a minimum capacity of 3 000 litres each or 1 airplane with a minimum capacity of 8 000 litres (1). ability to perform continuous operations. main components airplane. minimum of two crews. technical staff. field maintenance kit. communication equipment allowing air-to-air and air-to-ground communication. self-sufficiency equipment storage and maintenance of the equipment of the module; equipment for the communication with the relevant partners, notably those in charge of the coordination on site. deployment availability for departure maximum 3 hours after the acceptance of the offer in the case of a rapid intervention response (2). ability to be deployed in a range of 2 000 km within maximum 24 hours. 2. aerial forest firefighting capacities using helicopters tasks contribute to the extinction of large forest and vegetal by performing aerial firefighting. capacities 1 helicopter with a minimum capacity of 3 000 litres (3) ability to perform continuous operations. main components helicopter with minimum two crews. technical staff. water bucket or releasing kit. 1 maintenance set. 1 spare parts set. rescue hoists. communication equipment allowing air-to-air and air-to-ground communication. self-sufficiency equipment storage and maintenance of the equipment of the module; equipment for the communication with the relevant partners, notably those in charge of the coordination on site. deployment availability for departure maximum 3 hours after the acceptance of the offer in the case of a rapid intervention response (4). ability to be deployed in a range of 2 000 km within maximum 24 hours. (1) such requirements may be subject to review based on possible developments on the market of aerial forest firefighting capacities, including in relation to the availability of spare parts. (2) rapid intervention response is a response operation lasting maximum one day including the flight to and from the site where the resceu capacity is positioned. (3) for the purposes of implementing article 35 of decision no 1313/2013/eu and when justified based on assessment of regional vulnerability, aerial forest firefighting capacities using helicopters may be composed of maximum 3 helicopters with a total minimum capacity of 3 000 litres. (4) rapid intervention response is a response operation lasting maximum one day including the flight to and from the site where the resceu capacity is positioned.

name: council implementing decision (eu) 2019/568 of 8 april 2019 on the appointment of a member of the single resolution board type: decision_impl subject matter: eu institutions and european civil service; monetary economics date published: 2019-04-10 10.4.2019 en official journal of the european union l 99/38 council implementing decision (eu) 2019/568 of 8 april 2019 on the appointment of a member of the single resolution board the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to regulation (eu) no 806/2014 of the european parliament and of the council of 15 july 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a single resolution mechanism and a single resolution fund and amending regulation (eu) no 1093/2010 (1), and in particular article 56(6) thereof, having regard to the proposal from the european commission, whereas: (1) on 5 december 2018 the commission, after hearing the single resolution board (the board) in its plenary session, adopted a shortlist of candidates for the position of a member of the board and provided it to the european parliament. (2) the council was informed of the shortlist on the same date. (3) pursuant to article 56(5) of regulation (eu) no 806/2014, the term of office of full-time members of the board is five years. (4) on 30 january 2019, the commission adopted a proposal for the appointment of sebastiano laviola as a member of the board and submitted it to the european parliament for approval. (5) the european parliament approved the proposal on 14 march 2019, has adopted this decision: article 1 mr sebastiano laviola is hereby appointed as a full-time member of the single resolution board for a term of office of five years as from 1 may 2019. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at luxembourg, 8 april 2019. for the council the president f. mogherini (1) oj l 225, 30.7.2014, p. 1.

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/525 of 26 march 2019 amending decision 2011/163/eu on the approval of plans submitted by third countries in accordance with article 29 of council directive 96/23/ec (notified under document c(2019) 2208) (text with eea relevance.) type: decision_impl subject matter: africa; agricultural activity; health; trade; agricultural policy date published: 2019-03-28 28.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 86/72 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/525 of 26 march 2019 amending decision 2011/163/eu on the approval of plans submitted by third countries in accordance with article 29 of council directive 96/23/ec (notified under document c(2019) 2208) (text with eea relevance) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to council directive 96/23/ec of 29 april 1996 on measures to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products and repealing directives 85/358/eec and 86/469/eec and decisions 89/187/eec and 91/664/eec (1), and in particular the fourth subparagraph of article 29(1) thereof, whereas: (1) directive 96/23/ec lays down measures to monitor the substances and groups of residues listed in annex i thereto. article 29 of that directive requires that third countries from which member states are authorised to import animals and animal products covered by that directive submit residue monitoring plans providing required guarantees (the plans). the plans should cover at least the groups of residues and substances listed in annex i to that directive. (2) commission decision 2011/163/eu (2) approves the plans submitted by certain third countries concerning specified animal and animal products listed in the annex to that decision (the list). (3) south africa has submitted to the commission a plan for farmed game, which only covers ratites. south africa has overcome the shortcomings identified during the latest audit carried out in february 2017 regarding the capacity of the south african authorities to carry out reliable checks for farmed game. the submitted plan provides sufficient guarantees and should be approved. the entry for south africa for farmed game should therefore be included in the list, with a specification limiting the approval for farmed game to ratites only. (4) decision 2011/163/eu should therefore be amended accordingly. (5) the measures provided for in this decision are in accordance with the opinion of the standing committee on plants, animals, food and feed, has adopted this decision: article 1 the annex to decision 2011/163/eu is replaced by the text set out in the annex to this decision. article 2 this decision is addressed to the member states. done at brussels, 26 march 2019. for the commission vytenis andriukaitis member of the commission (1) oj l 125, 23.5.1996, p. 10. (2) commission decision 2011/163/eu of 16 march 2011 on the approval of plans submitted by third countries in accordance with article 29 of council directive 96/23/ec (oj l 70, 17.3.2011, p. 40). annex annex code iso2 country bovine ovine/caprine porcine equine poultry aqua-culture milk eggs rabbit wild game farmed game honey ad andorra x x x (3) x x ae united arab emirates x (3) x (1) al albania x x (8) x am armenia x x ar argentina x x x x x x x x x x x au australia x x x x x x x x ba bosnia and herzegovina x x x x x x x x bd bangladesh x bf burkina faso x bj benin x bn brunei x br brazil x x x x x bw botswana x x x by belarus x (2) x x x bz belize x ca canada x x x x x x x x x x x x ch switzerland x x x x x x x x x x x x cl chile x x x x x x x x cm cameroon x cn china x x x x x co colombia x x cr costa rica x cu cuba x x do dominican republic x ec ecuador x et ethiopia x fk falklands islands x x x fo faeroe islands x ge georgia x gh ghana x gl greenland x x gt guatemala x x hn honduras x id indonesia x il israel (6) x x x x x x in india x x x ir iran x jm jamaica x jp japan x x x x x x ke kenya x kg kyrgyzstan x kr south korea x x lk sri lanka x ma morocco x x md moldova x x x x me montenegro x x x x x x x x mg madagascar x x mk north macedonia x x x x x x x x x mm republic of the union of myanmar x mu mauritius x x (3) mx mexico x x x my malaysia x (3) x mz mozambique x na namibia x x nc new caledonia x (3) x x x x ni nicaragua x x nz new zealand x x x x x x x x pa panama x pe peru x ph philippines x pm saint pierre and miquelon x pn pitcairn islands x py paraguay x rs serbia (4) x x x x (2) x x x x x x ru russia x x x x x x x (5) x rw rwanda x sa saudi arabia x sg singapore x (3) x (3) x (3) x (7) x (3) x x (3) x (7) x (7) sm san marino x x (3) x x sr suriname x sv el salvador x sz eswatini x th thailand x x x tn tunisia x x x tr turkey x x x x x tw taiwan x x tz tanzania x x ua ukraine x x x x x x x x ug uganda x x us united states x x x x x x x x x x x uy uruguay x x x x x x x ve venezuela x vn vietnam x x za south africa x x (9) zm zambia x (1) camel milk only. (2) export to the union of live equidae for slaughter (food producing animals only). (3) third countries using only raw material either from member states or from other third countries approved for imports of such raw material to the union, in accordance with article 2. (4) not including kosovo (this designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with unscr 1244 (1999) and the icj opinion on the kosovo declaration of independence). (5) only for reindeer from the murmansk and yamalo-nenets regions. (6) hereafter understood as the state of israel, excluding the territories under israeli administration since june 1967, namely the golan heights, the gaza strip, east jerusalem and the rest of the west bank. (7) only for commodities of fresh meat originating from new zealand, destined to the union and being unloaded, reloaded and transited with or without storage through singapore. (8) finfish only. (9) ratites only.

name: commission decision (eu) 2019/527 of 27 march 2019 amending the annex to the monetary agreement between the european union and the principality of andorra type: decision subject matter: free movement of capital; monetary relations; international affairs; criminal law; europe; european construction; european union law date published: 2019-03-28 28.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 86/97 commission decision (eu) 2019/527 of 27 march 2019 amending the annex to the monetary agreement between the european union and the principality of andorra the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to the monetary agreement of 30 june 2011 between the european union and the principality of andorra (1), and in particular article 8(4) thereof, whereas: (1) article 8 of the monetary agreement between the european union and the principality of andorra (hereinafter the monetary agreement) requires the principality of andorra to implement union acts concerning the rules on euro banknotes and coins, banking and financial law, prevention of money laundering, prevention of fraud and counterfeiting of cash and non-cash means of payment, medals and tokens and statistical reporting requirements. those acts are listed in the annex to the monetary agreement. (2) the annex needs to be amended by the commission every year to take into account the new relevant legal acts and rules of the union and the amendments to the existing ones. (3) some legal acts and rules of the union are not relevant anymore and should therefore be deleted from the annex, while some new relevant legal acts and rules of the union and some amendments to existing legal acts were adopted and have to be added to the annex. (4) the annex to the monetary agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, has adopted this decision: article 1 the annex to the monetary agreement between the european union and the principality of andorra is replaced by the annex to this decision. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at brussels, 27 march 2019. for the commission the president jean-claude juncker (1) oj c 369, 17.12.2011, p. 1. annex annex legal provisions to be implemented deadline for implementing prevention of money laundering 1 council framework decision 2005/212/jha of 24 february 2005 on confiscation of crime-related proceeds, instrumentalities and property (oj l 68, 15.3.2005, p. 49) 31 march 2015 (1) 2 council decision 2000/642/jha of 17 october 2000 concerning arrangements for cooperation between financial intelligence units of the member states in respect of exchanging information (oj l 271, 24.10.2000, p. 4) 3 council framework decision 2001/500/jha of 26 june 2001 on money laundering, the identification, tracing, freezing, seizing and confiscation of instrumentalities and the proceeds of crime (oj l 182, 5.7.2001, p. 1) 4 regulation (ec) no 1889/2005 of the european parliament and of the council of 26 october 2005 on controls of cash entering or leaving the community (oj l 309, 25.11.2005, p. 9) 5 council decision 2007/845/jha of 6 december 2007 concerning cooperation between asset recovery offices of the member states in the field of tracing and identification of proceeds from, or other property related to, crime (oj l 332, 18.12.2007, p. 103) 6 directive 2014/42/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 3 april 2014 on the freezing and confiscation of instrumentalities and proceeds of crime in the european union (oj l 127, 29.4.2014, p. 39) 1 november 2016 (2) 7 regulation (eu) 2015/847 of the european parliament and of the council of 20 may 2015 on information accompanying transfers of funds and repealing regulation (ec) no 1781/2006 (oj l 141, 5.6.2015, p. 1) 1 october 2017 (3) 8 directive 2015/849/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 20 may 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending regulation (eu) no 648/2012 of the european parliament and of the council, and repealing directive 2005/60/ec of the european parliament and of the council and commission directive 2006/70/ec (oj l 141, 5.6.2015, p. 73) 1 october 2017 (3) amended by: 9 directive (eu) 2018/843 of the european parliament and of the council of 30 may 2018 amending directive (eu) 2015/849 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, and amending directives 2009/138/ec and 2013/36/eu (oj l 156, 19.6.2018, p. 43) 31 december 2020 (6) supplemented by: 10 commission delegated regulation (eu) 2016/1675 of 14 july 2016 supplementing directive (eu) 2015/849 of the european parliament and of the council by identifying high-risk third countries with strategic deficiencies (oj l 254, 20.9.2016, p. 1) 1 december 2017 (5) amended by: 11 commission delegated regulation (eu) 2018/105 of 27 october 2017 amending delegated regulation (eu) 2016/1675, as regards adding ethiopia to the list of high-risk third countries in the table in point i of the annex (oj l 19, 24.1.2018, p. 1) 31 march 2019 (6) 12 commission delegated regulation (eu) 2018/212 of 13 december 2017 amending delegated regulation (eu) 2016/1675 supplementing directive (eu) 2015/849 of the european parliament and of the council, as regards adding sri lanka, trinidad and tobago, and tunisia to the table in point i of the annex (oj l 41, 14.2.2018, p. 4) 31 march 2019 (6) prevention of fraud and counterfeiting 13 council framework decision 2001/413/jha of 28 may 2001 combating fraud and counterfeiting of non-cash means of payment (oj l 149, 2.6.2001, p. 1) 30 september 2013 14 council regulation (ec) no 1338/2001 of 28 june 2001 laying down measures necessary for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting (oj l 181, 4.7.2001, p. 6) 30 september 2013 amended by: 15 council regulation (ec) no 44/2009 of 18 december 2008 amending regulation (ec) no 1338/2001 laying down measures necessary for the protection of the euro against counterfeiting (oj l 17, 22.1.2009, p. 1) 16 council decision 2001/887/jha of 6 december 2001 on the protection of the euro against counterfeiting (oj l 329, 14.12.2001, p. 1) 30 september 2013 17 council decision 2003/861/ec of 8 december 2003 concerning analysis and cooperation with regard to counterfeit euro coins (oj l 325, 12.12.2003, p. 44) 30 september 2013 18 council regulation (ec) no 2182/2004 of 6 december 2004 concerning medals and tokens similar to euro coins (oj l 373, 21.12.2004, p. 1) 30 september 2013 amended by: 19 council regulation (ec) no 46/2009 of 18 december 2008 amending regulation (ec) no 2182/2004 concerning medals and tokens similar to euro coins (oj l 17, 22.1.2009, p. 5) 20 directive 2014/62/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 15 may 2014 on the protection of the euro and other currencies against counterfeiting by criminal law, and replacing council framework decision 2000/383/jha (oj l 151, 21.5.2014, p. 1) 30 june 2016 (2) rules on euro banknotes and coins 21 council regulation (ec) no 2532/98 of 23 november 1998 concerning the powers of the european central bank to impose sanctions (oj l 318, 27.11.1998, p. 4) 30 september 2014 (1) 22 council conclusions of 10 may 1999 on the quality management system for euro coins 31 march 2013 23 communication from the commission 2001/c 318/03 of 22 october 2001 on copyright protection of the common face design of the euro coins (com(2001) 600 final) (oj c 318, 13.11.2001, p. 3) 31 march 2013 24 guideline of the european central bank ecb/2003/5 of 20 march 2003 on the enforcement of measures to counter non-compliant reproductions of euro banknotes and on the exchange and withdrawal of euro banknotes (oj l 78, 25.3.2003, p. 20) 31 march 2013 amended by: 25 guideline of the european central bank ecb/2013/11 of 19 april 2013 amending guideline ecb/2003/5 on the enforcement of measures to counter non-compliant reproductions of euro banknotes and on the exchange and withdrawal of euro banknotes (oj l 118, 30.4.2013, p. 43) 30 september 2014 (1) 26 commission recommendation 2009/23/ec of 19 december 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (c(2008) 8625) (oj l 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52) 31 march 2013 27 decision of the european central bank ecb/2010/14 of 16 september 2010 on the authenticity and fitness checking and recirculation of euro banknotes (oj l 267, 9.10.2010, p. 1) 30 september 2013 amended by: 28 decision of the european central bank ecb/2012/19 of 7 september 2012 amending decision ecb/2010/14 on the authenticity and fitness checking and recirculation of euro banknotes (oj l 253, 20.9.2012, p. 19) 30 september 2014 (1) 29 regulation (eu) no 1210/2010 of the european parliament and of the council of 15 december 2010 concerning authentication of euro coins and handling of euro coins unfit for circulation (oj l 339, 22.12.2010, p. 1) 31 march 2013 30 regulation (eu) no 1214/2011 of the european parliament and of the council of 16 november 2011 on the professional transport of euro cash by road between euro-area member states (oj l 316, 29.11.2011, p. 1) 31 march 2015 (1) 31 regulation (eu) no 651/2012 of the european parliament and of the council of 4 july 2012 on the issuance of euro coins (oj l 201, 27.7.2012, p. 135) 30 september 2014 (1) 32 decision of the european central bank ecb/2013/10 of 19 april 2013 on the denominations, specifications, reproduction, exchange and withdrawal of euro banknotes (oj l 118, 30.4.2013, p. 37) 30 september 2014 (1) 33 council regulation (eu) no 729/2014 of 24 june 2014 on denominations and technical specifications of euro coins intended for circulation (recast) (oj l 194, 2.7.2014, p. 1) 30 september 2014 (2) banking and financial legislation 34 council directive 86/635/eec of 8 december 1986 on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of banks and other financial institutions (oj l 372, 31.12.1986, p. 1) 31 march 2016 amended by: 35 directive 2001/65/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 27 september 2001 amending directives 78/660/eec, 83/349/eec and 86/635/eec as regards the valuation rules for the annual and consolidated accounts of certain types of companies as well as of banks and other financial institutions (oj l 283, 27.10.2001, p. 28) 36 directive 2003/51/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 18 june 2003 amending directives 78/660/eec, 83/349/eec, 86/635/eec and 91/674/eec on the annual and consolidated accounts of certain types of companies, banks and other financial institutions and insurance undertakings (oj l 178, 17.7.2003, p. 16) 37 directive 2006/46/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 14 june 2006 amending council directives 78/660/eec on the annual accounts of certain types of companies, 83/349/eec on consolidated accounts, 86/635/eec on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of banks and other financial institutions and 91/674/eec on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of insurance undertakings (oj l 224, 16.8.2006, p. 1) 38 council directive 89/117/eec of 13 february 1989 on the obligations of branches established in a member state of credit institutions and financial institutions having their head offices outside that member state regarding the publication of annual accounting documents (oj l 44, 16.2.1989, p. 40) 31 march 2018 39 directive 97/9/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 3 march 1997 on investment compensation schemes (oj l 84, 26.3.1997, p. 22) 31 march 2018 40 directive 98/26/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 19 may 1998 on settlement finality in payment and securities settlement systems (oj l 166, 11.6.1998, p. 45) 31 march 2018 amended by: 41 directive 2009/44/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 6 may 2009 amending directive 98/26/ec on settlement finality in payment and securities settlement systems and directive 2002/47/ec on financial collateral arrangements as regards linked systems and credit claims (oj l 146, 10.6.2009, p. 37) 42 directive 2010/78/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 24 november 2010 amending directives 98/26/ec, 2002/87/ec, 2003/6/ec, 2003/41/ec, 2003/71/ec, 2004/39/ec, 2004/109/ec, 2005/60/ec, 2006/48/ec, 2006/49/ec and 2009/65/ec in respect of the powers of the european supervisory authority (european banking authority), the european supervisory authority (european insurance and occupational pensions authority) and the european supervisory authority (european securities and markets authority) (oj l 331, 15.12.2010, p. 120) 43 regulation (eu) no 648/2012 of the european parliament and of the council of 4 july 2012 on otc derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (oj l 201, 27.7.2012, p. 1) 44 regulation (eu) no 909/2014 of the european parliament and of the council of 23 july 2014 on improving securities settlement in the european union and on central securities depositories and amending directives 98/26/ec and 2014/65/eu and regulation (eu) no 236/2012 (oj l 257, 28.8.2014, p. 1) 31 march 2018 except for article 3(1): 1 february 2023 and from 1 february 2025 (3) 45 directive 2001/24/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 4 april 2001 on the reorganisation and winding up of credit institutions (oj l 125, 5.5.2001, p. 15) 31 march 2018 amended by: 46 directive 2014/59/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 15 may 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms and amending council directive 82/891/eec, and directives 2001/24/ec, 2002/47/ec, 2004/25/ec, 2005/56/ec, 2007/36/ec, 2011/35/eu, 2012/30/eu and 2013/36/eu, and regulations (eu) no 1093/2010 and (eu) no 648/2012, of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 173, 12.6.2014, p. 190) 47 directive 2002/47/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 6 june 2002 on financial collateral arrangements (oj l 168, 27.6.2002, p. 43) 31 march 2018 amended by: 48 directive 2009/44/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 6 may 2009 amending directive 98/26/ec on settlement finality in payment and securities settlement systems and directive 2002/47/ec on financial collateral arrangements as regards linked systems and credit claims (oj l 146, 10.6.2009, p. 37) 49 directive 2014/59/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 15 may 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms and amending council directive 82/891/eec, and directives 2001/24/ec, 2002/47/ec, 2004/25/ec, 2005/56/ec, 2007/36/ec, 2011/35/eu, 2012/30/eu and 2013/36/eu, and regulations (eu) no 1093/2010 and (eu) no 648/2012, of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 173, 12.6.2014, p. 190) 50 directive 2002/87/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 16 december 2002 on the supplementary supervision of credit institutions, insurance undertakings and investment firms in a financial conglomerate and amending council directives 73/239/eec, 79/267/eec, 92/49/eec, 92/96/eec, 93/6/eec and 93/22/eec, and directives 98/78/ec and 2000/12/ec of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 35, 11.2.2003, p. 1) 31 march 2018 amended by: 51 directive 2005/1/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 9 march 2005 amending council directives 73/239/eec, 85/611/eec, 91/675/eec, 92/49/eec and 93/6/eec and directives 94/19/ec, 98/78/ec, 2000/12/ec, 2001/34/ec, 2002/83/ec and 2002/87/ec in order to establish a new organisational structure for financial services committees (oj l 79, 24.3.2005, p. 9) 52 directive 2008/25/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 11 march 2008 amending directive 2002/87/ec on the supplementary supervision of credit institutions, insurance undertakings and investment firms in a financial conglomerate, as regards the implementing powers conferred on the commission (oj l 81, 20.3.2008, p. 40) 53 directive 2010/78/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 24 november 2010 amending directives 98/26/ec, 2002/87/ec, 2003/6/ec, 2003/41/ec, 2003/71/ec, 2004/39/ec, 2004/109/ec, 2005/60/ec, 2006/48/ec, 2006/49/ec and 2009/65/ec in respect of the powers of the european supervisory authority (european banking authority), the european supervisory authority (european insurance and occupational pensions authority) and the european supervisory authority (european securities and markets authority) (oj l 331, 15.12.2010, p. 120) 54 directive 2011/89/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 16 november 2011 amending directives 98/78/ec, 2002/87/ec, 2006/48/ec and 2009/138/ec as regards the supplementary supervision of financial entities in a financial conglomerate (oj l 326, 8.12.2011, p. 113) 55 directive 2013/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 26 june 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending directive 2002/87/ec and repealing directives 2006/48/ec and 2006/49/ec (oj l 176, 27.6.2013, p. 338) 30 september 2017 supplemented by: 56 commission delegated regulation (eu) 2015/2303 of 28 july 2015 supplementing directive 2002/87/ec of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the definitions and coordinating the supplementary supervision of risk concentration and intra-group transactions (oj l 326, 11.12.2015, p. 34) 31 march 2018 (4) 57 regulation (ec) no 924/2009 of the european parliament and of the council of 16 september 2009 on cross-border payments in the community and repealing regulation (ec) no 2560/2001 (oj l 266, 9.10.2009, p. 11) 31 march 2018 amended by: 58 regulation (eu) no 260/2012 of the european parliament and of the council of 14 march 2012 establishing technical and business requirements for credit transfers and direct debits in euro and amending regulation (ec) no 924/2009 (oj l 94, 30.3.2012, p. 22) 59 directive 2009/110/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 16 september 2009 on the taking up, pursuit and prudential supervision of the business of electronic money institutions amending directives 2005/60/ec and 2006/48/ec and repealing directive 2000/46/ec (oj l 267, 10.10.2009, p. 7) 31 march 2016 amended by: 60 directive 2013/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 26 june 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending directive 2002/87/ec and repealing directives 2006/48/ec and 2006/49/ec (oj l 176, 27.6.2013, p. 338). 30 september 2017 (3) 61 directive (eu) 2015/2366 of the european parliament and of the council of 25 november 2015 on payment services in the internal market, amending directives 2002/65/ec, 2009/110/ec and 2013/36/eu and regulation (eu) no 1093/2010, and repealing directive 2007/64/ec (oj l 337, 23.12.2015, p. 35) 30 september 2018 (4) 62 regulation (eu) no 1093/2010 of the european parliament and of the council of 24 november 2010 establishing a european supervisory authority (european banking authority), amending decision no 716/2009/ec and repealing commission decision 2009/78/ec (oj l, 331, 15.12.2010, p. 12) 31 march 2016 amended by: 63 regulation (eu) no 1022/2013 of the european parliament and of the council of 22 october 2013 amending regulation (eu) no 1093/2010 establishing a european supervisory authority (european banking authority) as regards the conferral of specific tasks on the european central bank pursuant to council regulation (eu) no 1024/2013 (oj l 287, 29.10.2013, p. 5) 64 directive 2014/17/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 4 february 2014 on credit agreements for consumers relating to residential immovable property and amending directives 2008/48/ec and 2013/36/eu and regulation (eu) no 1093/2010 (oj l 60, 28.2.2014, p. 34) 65 directive 2014/59/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 15 may 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms and amending council directive 82/891/eec, and directives 2001/24/ec, 2002/47/ec, 2004/25/ec, 2005/56/ec, 2007/36/ec, 2011/35/eu, 2012/30/eu and 2013/36/eu, and regulations (eu) no 1093/2010 and (eu) no 648/2012, of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 173, 12.6.2014, p. 190) 66 regulation (eu) no 806/2014 of the european parliament and of the council of 15 july 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a single resolution mechanism and a single resolution fund and amending regulation (eu) no 1093/2010 (oj l 225, 30.7.2014, p. 1) 67 directive (eu) 2015/2366 of the european parliament and of the council of 25 november 2015 on payment services in the internal market, amending directives 2002/65/ec, 2009/110/ec and 2013/36/eu and regulation (eu) no 1093/2010, and repealing directive 2007/64/ec (oj l 337, 23.12.2015, p. 35) 68 regulation (eu) no 1095/2010 of the european parliament and of the council of 24 november 2010 establishing a european supervisory authority (european securities and markets authority), amending decision no 716/2009/ec and repealing commission decision 2009/77/ec (oj l 331, 15.12.2010, p. 84) 31 march 2016 amended by: 69 directive 2011/61/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 8 june 2011 on alternative investment fund managers and amending directives 2003/41/ec and 2009/65/ec and regulations (ec) no 1060/2009 and (eu) no 1095/2010 (oj l 174, 1.7.2011, p. 1) 70 regulation (eu) no 258/2014 of the european parliament and of the council of 3 april 2014 establishing a union programme to support specific activities in the field of financial reporting and auditing for the period of 2014-20 and repealing decision no 716/2009/ec (oj l 105, 8.4.2014, p. 1) 71 directive 2014/51/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 16 april 2014 amending directives 2003/71/ec and 2009/138/ec and regulations (ec) no 1060/2009, (eu) no 1094/2010 and (eu) no 1095/2010 in respect of the powers of the european supervisory authority (european insurance and occupational pensions authority) and the european supervisory authority (european securities and markets authority) (oj l 153, 22.5.2014, p. 1) 72 regulation (eu) no 648/2012 of the european parliament and of the council of 4 july 2012 on otc derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (oj l 201, 27.7.2012, p. 1) and the related level 2 measures as appropriate 30 september 2019 (1) amended by: 73 regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council of 26 june 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending regulation (eu) no 648/2012 (oj l 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1) 74 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 1002/2013 of 12 july 2013 amending regulation (eu) no 648/2012 of the european parliament and of the council on otc derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories with regard to the list of exempted entities (oj l 279, 19.10.2013, p. 2) 75 directive 2014/59/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 15 may 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms and amending council directive 82/891/eec, and directives 2001/24/ec, 2002/47/ec, 2004/25/ec, 2005/56/ec, 2007/36/ec, 2011/35/eu, 2012/30/eu and 2013/36/eu, and regulations (eu) no 1093/2010 and (eu) no 648/2012, of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 173, 12.6.2014, p. 190) 76 regulation (eu) no 600/2014 of the european parliament and of the council of 15 may 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending regulation (eu) no 648/2012 (oj l 173, 12.6.2014, p. 84) 77 directive 2015/849/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 20 may 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending regulation (eu) no 648/2012 of the european parliament and of the council, and repealing directive 2005/60/ec of the european parliament and of the council and commission directive 2006/70/ec (oj l 141, 5.6.2015, p. 73) 78 commission delegated regulation (eu) 2015/1515 of 5 june 2015 amending regulation (eu) no 648/2012 of the european parliament and of the council as regards the extension of the transitional periods related to pension scheme arrangements (oj l 239, 15.9.2015, p. 63) 30 september 2019 (4) 79 regulation (eu) 2015/2365 of the european parliament and of the council of 25 november 2015 on transparency of securities financing transactions and of reuse and amending regulation (eu) no 648/2012 (oj l 337, 23.12.2015, p. 1) 30 september 2019 (4) supplemented by: 80 commission implementing regulation (eu) no 1247/2012 of 19 december 2012 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to the format and frequency of trade reports to trade repositories according to regulation (eu) no 648/2012 of the european parliament and of the council on otc derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (oj l 352, 21.12.2012, p. 20) 81 commission implementing regulation (eu) no 1248/2012 of 19 december 2012 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to the format of applications for registration of trade repositories according to regulation (eu) no 648/2012 of the european parliament and of the council on otc derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (oj l 352, 21.12.2012, p. 30) 82 commission implementing regulation (eu) no 1249/2012 of 19 december 2012 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to the format of the records to be maintained by central counterparties according to regulation (eu) no 648/2012 of the european parliament and of the council on otc derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (oj l 352, 21.12.2012, p. 32) 83 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 148/2013 of 19 december 2012 supplementing regulation (eu) no 648/2012 of the european parliament and of the council on otc derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories with regard to regulatory technical standards on the minimum details of the data to be reported to trade repositories (oj l 52, 23.2.2013, p. 1) 84 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 149/2013 of 19 december 2012 supplementing regulation (eu) no 648/2012 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards on indirect clearing arrangements, the clearing obligation, the public register, access to a trading venue, non-financial counterparties, and risk mitigation techniques for otc derivatives contracts not cleared by a ccp (oj l 52, 23.2.2013, p. 11) 85 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 150/2013 of 19 december 2012 supplementing regulation (eu) no 648/2012 of the european parliament and of the council on otc derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the details of the application for registration as a trade repository (oj l 52, 23.2.2013, p. 25) 86 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 151/2013 of 19 december 2012 supplementing regulation (eu) no 648/2012 of the european parliament and of the council on otc derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories, with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the data to be published and made available by trade repositories and operational standards for aggregating, comparing and accessing the data (oj l 52, 23.2.2013, p. 33) 87 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 152/2013 of 19 december 2012 supplementing regulation (eu) no 648/2012 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards on capital requirements for central counterparties (oj l 52, 23.2.2013, p. 37) 88 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 153/2013 of 19 december 2012 supplementing regulation (eu) no 648/2012 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards on requirements for central counterparties (oj l 52, 23.2.2013, p. 41) 89 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 876/2013 of 28 may 2013 supplementing regulation (eu) no 648/2012 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards on colleges for central counterparties (oj l 244, 13.9.2013, p. 19) 30 september 2019 (2) 90 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 285/2014 of 13 february 2014 supplementing regulation (eu) no 648/2012 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards on direct, substantial and foreseeable effect of contracts within the union and to prevent the evasion of rules and obligations (oj l 352, 21.3.2014, p. 1) 30 september 2019 (2) 91 commission implementing regulation (eu) no 484/2014 of 12 may 2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to the hypothetical capital of a central counterparty according to regulation (eu) no 648/2012 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 138, 13.5.2014, p. 57) 30 september 2019 (2) 92 commission delegated regulation (eu) 2015/2205 of 6 august 2015 supplementing regulation (eu) no 648/2012 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards on the clearing obligation (oj l 314, 1.12.2015, p. 13) 30 september 2019 (4) 93 commission delegated regulation (eu) 2016/592 of 1 march 2016 supplementing regulation (eu) no 648/2012 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards on the clearing obligation (oj l 103, 19.4.2016, p. 5) 30 september 2019 (4) 94 regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council of 26 june 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending regulation (eu) no 648/2012 (oj l 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1) and the related level 2 measures as appropriate 30 september 2017 (1) amended by: 95 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 2015/62 of 10 october 2014 amending regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to the leverage ratio (oj l 11, 17.1.2015, p. 37) 96 regulation (eu) 2017/2395 of the european parliament and of the council of 12 december 2017 amending regulation (eu) no 575/2013 as regards transitional arrangements for mitigating the impact of the introduction of ifrs 9 on own funds and for the large exposures treatment of certain public sector exposures denominated in the domestic currency of any member state (oj l 345, 27.12.2017, p. 27) 30 june 2019 (6) 97 regulation (eu) 2017/2401 of the european parliament and of the council of 12 december 2017 amending regulation (eu) no 575/2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms (oj l 347, 28.12.2017, p. 1) 31 march 2020 (6) supplemented by: 98 commission implementing regulation (eu) no 1423/2013 of 20 december 2013 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to disclosure of own funds requirements for institutions according to regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 355, 31.12.2013, p. 60) 30 september 2017 (2) 99 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 183/2014 of 20 december 2013 supplementing regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms, with regard to regulatory technical standards for specifying the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments (oj l 57, 27.2.2014, p. 3) 30 september 2017 (2) 100 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 241/2014 of 7 january 2014 supplementing regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards for own funds requirements for institutions (oj l 74, 14.3.2014, p. 8) 30 september 2017 (2) amended by: 101 commission delegated regulation (eu) 2015/488 of 4 september 2014 amending delegated regulation (eu) no 241/2014 as regards own funds requirements for firms based on fixed overheads (oj l 78, 24.3.2015, p. 1) 30 september 2017 (3) 102 commission delegated regulation (eu) 2015/850 of 30 january 2015 amending delegated regulation (eu) no 241/2014 supplementing regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards for own funds requirements for institutions (oj l 135, 2.6.2015, p. 1) 30 september 2017 (3) 103 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 2015/923 of 11 march 2015 amending delegated regulation (eu) no 241/2014 supplementing regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards for own funds requirements for institutions (oj l 150, 17.6.2015, p. 1) 30 september 2017 (3) 104 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 342/2014 of 21 january 2014 supplementing directive 2002/87/ec of the european parliament and of the council and regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the application of the calculation methods of capital adequacy requirements for financial conglomerates (oj l 100, 3.4.2014, p. 1) 30 september 2017 (2) 105 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 523/2014 of 12 march 2014 supplementing regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards for determining what constitutes the close correspondence between the value of an institution's covered bonds and the value of the institution's assets (oj l 148, 20.5.2014, p. 4) 30 september 2017 (2) 106 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 525/2014 of 12 march 2014 supplementing regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the definition of market (oj l 148, 20.5.2014, p. 15) 30 september 2017 (2) 107 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 526/2014 of 12 march 2014 supplementing regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards for determining proxy spread and limited smaller portfolios for credit valuation adjustment risk (oj l 148, 20.5.2014, p. 17) 30 september 2017 (2) 108 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 528/2014 of 12 march 2014 supplementing regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards for non-delta risk of options in the standardised market risk approach (oj l 148, 20.5.2014, p. 29) 30 september 2017 (2) 109 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 529/2014 of 12 march 2014 supplementing regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards for assessing the materiality of extensions and changes of the internal ratings based approach and the advanced measurement approach (oj l 148, 20.5.2014, p. 36) 30 september 2017 (2) amended by: 110 commission delegated regulation (eu) 2015/942 of 4 march 2015 amending delegated regulation (eu) no 529/2014 supplementing regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council as regards regulatory technical standards for assessing the materiality of extensions and changes of internal approaches when calculating own funds requirements for market risk (oj l 154, 19.6.2015, p. 1) 30 september 2017 (4) 111 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 625/2014 of 13 march 2014 supplementing regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council by way of regulatory technical standards specifying the requirements for investor, sponsor, original lenders and originator institutions relating to exposures to transferred credit risk (oj l 174, 13.6.2014, p. 16) 30 september 2017 (2) 112 commission implementing regulation (eu) no 680/2014 of 16 april 2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions according to regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 191, 28.6.2014, p. 1) 30 september 2017 (2) 113 commission implementing regulation (eu) no 602/2014 of 4 june 2014 laying down implementing technical standards for facilitating the convergence of supervisory practices with regard to the implementation of additional risk weights according to regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 166, 5.6.2014, p. 22) 30 september 2017 (2) 114 commission implementing regulation (eu) no 945/2014 of 4 september 2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to relevant appropriately diversified indices according to regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 265, 5.9.2014, p. 3) 30 september 2017 (3) 115 commission implementing regulation (eu) no 1030/2014 of 29 september 2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to the uniform formats and date for the disclosure of the values used to identify global systemically important institutions according to regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 284, 30.9.2014, p. 14) 30 september 2017 (3) 116 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 1187/2014 of 2 october 2014 supplementing regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council as regards regulatory technical standards for determining the overall exposure to a client or a group of connected clients in respect of transactions with underlying assets (oj l 324, 7.11.2014, p. 1) 30 september 2017 (3) 117 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 2015/61 of 10 october 2014 to supplement regulation (eu) 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to liquidity coverage requirement for credit institutions (oj l 11, 17.1.2015, p. 1) 30 september 2017 (3) 118 commission implementing regulation (eu) 2015/79 of 18 december 2014 amending implementing regulation (eu) no 680/2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions according to regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council as regards asset encumbrance, single data point model and validation rules (oj l 14, 21.1.2015, p. 1) 30 september 2017 (3) 119 commission delegated regulation (eu) 2015/585 of 18 december 2014 supplementing regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the specification of margin periods of risk (oj l 98, 15.4.2015, p. 1) 30 september 2017 (3) 120 commission implementing regulation (eu) 2015/227 of 9 january 2015 amending implementing regulation (eu) no 680/2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions according to regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 48, 20.2.2015, p. 1) 30 september 2017 (3) 121 commission implementing regulation (eu) 2015/233 of 13 february 2015 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to currencies in which there is an extremely narrow definition of central bank eligibility pursuant to regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 39, 14.2.2015, p. 11) 30 september 2017 (3) 122 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 2015/923 of 11 march 2015 amending delegated regulation (eu) no 241/2014 supplementing regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards for own funds requirements for institutions (oj l 150, 17.6.2015, p. 1). 30 september 2017 (3) 123 commission delegated regulation (eu) 2015/1555 of 28 may 2015 supplementing regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the disclosure of information in relation to the compliance of institutions with the requirement for a countercyclical capital buffer in accordance with article 440 (oj l 244, 19.9.2015, p. 1) 30 september 2017 (4) 124 commission delegated regulation (eu) 2015/1556 of 11 june 2015 supplementing regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the transitional treatment of equity exposures under the irb approach (oj l 244, 19.9.2015, p. 9) 30 september 2017 (4) 125 commission delegated regulation (eu) 2015/1798 of 2 july 2015 correcting delegated regulation (eu) no 625/2014 supplementing regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council by way of regulatory technical standards specifying the requirements for investor, sponsor, original lenders and originator institutions relating to exposures to transferred credit risk (oj l 263, 8.10.2015, p. 12) 30 september 2017 (4) 126 commission implementing regulation (eu) 2015/1278 of 9 july 2015 amending implementing regulation (eu) no 680/2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions as regards instructions, templates and definitions (oj l 205, 31.7.2015, p. 1) 30 september 2017 (4) 127 commission implementing regulation (eu) 2016/100 of 16 october 2015 laying down implementing technical standards specifying the joint decision process with regard to the application for certain prudential permissions pursuant to regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 21, 28.1.2016, p. 45) 30 september 2017 (4) 128 commission delegated regulation (eu) 2016/101 of 26 october 2015 supplementing regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards for prudent valuation under article 105(14) (oj l 21, 28.1.2016, p. 54) 30 september 2017 (4) 129 commission implementing regulation (eu) 2015/2197 of 27 november 2015 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to closely correlated currencies in accordance with regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 313, 28.11.2015, p. 30) 30 september 2017 (4) 130 commission implementing regulation (eu) 2015/2344 of 15 december 2015 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to currencies with constraints on the availability of liquid assets in accordance with regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 330, 16.12.2015, p. 26) 30 september 2017 (4) 131 commission implementing regulation (eu) 2016/322 of 10 february 2016 amending implementing regulation (eu) no 680/2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions of the liquidity coverage requirement (oj l 64, 10.3.2016, p. 1) 30 september 2017 (4) 132 commission implementing regulation (eu) 2016/200 of 15 february 2016 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to disclosure of the leverage ratio for institutions, according to regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 39, 16.2.2016, p. 5) 30 september 2017 (4) 133 commission implementing regulation (eu) 2016/313 of 1 march 2016 amending implementing regulation (eu) no 680/2014 with regard to additional monitoring metrics for liquidity reporting (oj l 60, 5.3.2016, p. 5) 30 september 2017 (4) 134 commission implementing regulation (eu) 2016/428 of 23 march 2016 amending implementing regulation (eu) no 680/2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to supervisory reporting of institutions as regards the reporting of the leverage ratio (oj l 83, 31.3.2016, p. 1) 30 september 2017 (4) 135 directive 2013/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 26 june 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending directive 2002/87/ec and repealing directives 2006/48/ec and 2006/49/ec (oj l 176, 27.6.2013, p. 338) 30 september 2017 (1) amended by: 136 directive 2014/59/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 15 may 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms and amending council directive 82/891/eec, and directives 2001/24/ec, 2002/47/ec, 2004/25/ec, 2005/56/ec, 2007/36/ec, 2011/35/eu, 2012/30/eu and 2013/36/eu, and regulations (eu) no 1093/2010 and (eu) no 648/2012, of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 173, 12.6.2014, p. 190) supplemented by: 137 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 604/2014 of 4 march 2014 supplementing directive 2013/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards with respect to qualitative and appropriate quantitative criteria to identify categories of staff whose professional activities have a material impact on an institution's risk profile (oj l 167, 6.6.2014, p. 30) 30 september 2017 (2) 138 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 524/2014 of 12 march 2014 supplementing directive 2013/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the information that competent authorities of home and host member states supply to one another (oj l 148, 20.5.2014, p. 6) 30 september 2017 (2) 139 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 527/2014 of 12 march 2014 supplementing directive (eu) no 2013/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards specifying the classes of instruments that adequately reflect the credit quality of an institution as a going concern and are appropriate to be used for the purposes of variable remuneration (oj l 148, 20.5.2014, p. 21) 30 september 2017 (2) 140 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 530/2014 of 12 march 2014 supplementing directive 2013/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards further defining material exposures and thresholds for internal approaches to specific risk in the trading book (oj l 148, 20.5.2014, p. 50) 30 september 2017 (2) 141 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 1152/2014 of 4 june 2014 supplementing directive 2013/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards on the identification of the geographical location of the relevant credit exposures for calculating institution-specific countercyclical capital buffer rates (oj l 309, 30.10.2014, p. 5) 30 september 2017 (3) 142 commission implementing regulation (eu) no 620/2014 of 4 june 2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to information exchange between competent authorities of home and host member states, according to directive 2013/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 172, 12.6.2014, p. 1) 30 september 2017 (2) 143 commission implementing regulation (eu) no 650/2014 of 4 june 2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to the format, structure, contents list and annual publication date of the information to be disclosed by competent authorities in accordance with directive 2013/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 185, 25.6.2014, p. 1) 30 september 2017 (2) 144 commission implementing regulation (eu) no 710/2014 of 23 june 2014 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to conditions of application of the joint decision process for institution-specific prudential requirements according to directive 2013/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 188, 27.6.2014, p. 19) 30 september 2017 (2) 145 commission delegated regulation (eu) no 1222/2014 of 8 october 2014 supplementing directive 2013/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards for the specification of the methodology for the identification of global systemically important institutions and for the definition of subcategories of global systemically important institutions (oj l 330, 15.11.2014, p. 27) 30 september 2017 (3) 146 commission delegated regulation (eu) 2016/98 of 16 october 2015 supplementing directive 2013/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council with regard to regulatory technical standards for specifying the general conditions for the functioning of colleges of supervisors (oj l 21, 28.1.2016, p. 2) 30 september 2017 (4) 147 commission implementing regulation (eu) 2016/99 of 16 october 2015 laying down implementing technical standards with regard to determining the operational functioning of the colleges of supervisors according to directive 2013/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 21, 28.1.2016, p. 21) 30 september 2017 (4) 148 regulation (eu) no 596/2014 of the european parliament and of the council of 16 april 2014 on market abuse (market abuse regulation) and repealing directive 2003/6/ec of the european parliament and of the council and commission directives 2003/124/ec, 2003/125/ec and 2004/72/ec, (oj l 173, 12.6.2014, p. 1) and the related level 2 measures as appropriate. 30 september 2018 (4) amended by: 149 regulation (eu) 2016/1011 of the european parliament and of the council of 8 june 2016 on indices used as benchmarks in financial instruments and financial contracts or to measure the performance of investment funds and amending directives 2008/48/ec and 2014/17/eu and regulation (eu) no 596/2014 (oj l 171, 29.6.2016, p. 1) 1 march 2020 (6) 150 regulation (eu) no 2016/1033 of the european parliament and of the council of 23 june 2016 amending regulation (eu) no 600/2014 on markets in financial instruments, regulation (eu) no 596/2014 on market abuse and regulation (eu) no 909/2014 on improving securities settlement in the european union and on central securities depositories (oj l 175, 30.6.2016, p. 1) 30 september 2018 (5) supplemented by: 151 commission implementing directive (eu) 2015/2392 of 17 december 2015 on regulation (eu) no 596/2014 of the european parliament and of the council as regards reporting to competent authorities of actual or potential infringements of that regulation (oj l332, 18.12.2015, p. 126) 30 september 2018 (4) 152 commission delegated regulation (eu) 2016/522 of 17 december 2015 supplementing regulation (eu) no 596/2014 of the european parliament and of the council as regards an exemption for certain third countries public bodies and central banks, the indicators of market manipulation, the disclosure thresholds, the competent authority for notifications of delays, the permission for trading during closed periods and types of notifiable managers' transactions (oj l 88, 5.4.2016, p. 1) 30 september 2018 (4) 153 directive 2014/57/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 16 april 2014 on criminal sanctions for market abuse (market abuse directive) (oj l 173, 12.6.2014, p. 179) 30 september 2018 (4) 154 directive 2014/49/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 16 april 2014 on deposit-guarantee schemes (recast) (oj l 173, 12.6.2014, p. 149) 31 march 2016 (2) 155 directive 2014/59/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 15 may 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms and amending council directive 82/891/eec, and directives 2001/24/ec, 2002/47/ec, 2004/25/ec, 2005/56/ec, 2007/36/ec, 2011/35/eu, 2012/30/eu and 2013/36/eu, and regulations (eu) no 1093/2010 and (eu) no 648/2012, of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 173, 12.6.2014, p. 190) and the related level 2 measures as appropriate 31 march 2018 (2) amended by: 156 directive (eu) 2017/2399 of the european parliament and of the council of 12 december 2017 amending directive 2014/59/eu as regards the ranking of unsecured debt instruments in insolvency hierarchy (oj l 345, 27.12.2017, p. 96) 31 october 2019 (6) supplemented by: 157 commission delegated regulation (eu) 2015/63 of 21 october 2014 supplementing directive 2014/59/eu of the european parliament and of the council with regard to ex ante contributions to resolution financing arrangements (oj l 11, 17.1.2015, p. 44) 31 march 2018 (3) 158 directive 2014/65/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 15 may 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending directive 2002/92/ec and directive 2011/61/eu (oj l 173, 12.6.2014, p. 349) and the related level 2 measures as appropriate 31 december 2020 (3) amended by: 159 regulation (eu) no 909/2014 of the european parliament and of the council of 23 july 2014 on improving securities settlement in the european union and on central securities depositories and amending directives 98/26/ec and 2014/65/eu and regulation (eu) no 236/2012 (oj l 257, 28.8.2014, p. 1) 31 december 2020 (4) 160 directive 2016/1034 of the european parliament and of the council of 23 june 2016 amending directive 2014/65/eu on markets in financial instruments (oj l 175, 30.6.2016, p. 8) 31 december 2021 (5) 161 regulation (eu) no 600/2014 of the european parliament and of the council of 15 may 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending regulation (eu) no 648/2012 (oj l 173, 12.6.2014, p. 84) and the related level 2 measures as appropriate. 31 december 2020 (3) amended by: 162 regulation (eu) no 2016/1033 of the european parliament and of the council of 23 june 2016 amending regulation (eu) no 600/2014 on markets in financial instruments, regulation (eu) no 596/2014 on market abuse and regulation (eu) no 909/2014 on improving securities settlement in the european union and on central securities depositories (oj l 175, 30.6.2016, p. 1) 31 december 2020 (5) 163 regulation (eu) no 909/2014 of the european parliament and of the council of 23 july 2014 on improving securities settlement in the european union and on central securities depositories and amending directives 98/26/ec and 2014/65/eu and regulation (eu) no 236/2012 (oj l 257, 28.8.2014, p. 1) 31 december 2020 (4) amended by: 164 regulation (eu) 2016/1033 of the european parliament and of the council of 23 june 2016 amending regulation (eu) no 600/2014 on markets in financial instruments, regulation (eu) no 596/2014 on market abuse and regulation (eu) no 909/2014 on improving securities settlement in the european union and on central securities depositories (oj l 175, 30.6.2016, p. 1) 31 december 2020 (6) 165 regulation (eu) 2015/2365 of the european parliament and of the council of 25 november 2015 on transparency of securities financing transactions and of reuse and amending regulation (eu) no 648/2012 (oj l 337, 23.12.2015, p. 1) 30 september 2019 (4) 166 directive (eu) 2015/2366 of the european parliament and of the council of 25 november 2015 on payment services in the internal market, amending directives 2002/65/ec, 2009/110/ec and 2013/36/eu and regulation (eu) no 1093/2010, and repealing directive 2007/64/ec (oj l 337, 23.12.2015, p. 35) and the related level 2 measures as appropriate 30 september 2018 (4) 167 regulation (eu) 2016/1011 of the european parliament and of the council of 8 june 2016 on indices used as benchmarks in financial instruments and financial contracts or to measure the performance of investment funds and amending directives 2008/48/ec and 2014/17/eu and regulation (eu) no 596/2014 (oj l 171, 29.6.2016, p. 1) 1 march 2020 (6) legislation on collection of statistical information (*1) 168 guideline of the european central bank ecb/2013/24 of 25 july 2013 on the statistical reporting requirements of the european central bank in the field of quarterly financial accounts (oj l 2, 7.1.2014, p. 34) 31 march 2016 (2) amended by: 169 guideline (eu) 2016/66 of the european central bank of 26 november 2015 amending guideline ecb/2013/24 on the statistical reporting requirements of the ecb in the field of quarterly financial accounts (ecb/2015/40) (oj l 14, 21.1.2016, p. 36) 31 march 2017 (4) 170 regulation (eu) no 1071/2013 of the european central bank of 24 september 2013 concerning the balance sheet of the monetary financial institutions sector (recast) (ecb/2013/33) (oj l 297, 7.11.2013, p. 1) 31 march 2016 (2) amended by: 171 regulation (eu) no 1375/2014 of the european central bank of 10 december 2014 amending regulation (eu) no 1071/2013 (ecb/2013/33) concerning the balance sheet of the monetary financial institutions sector (ecb/2014/51) (oj l 366, 20.12.2014, p. 77) 172 regulation (eu) no 1072/2013 of the european central bank of 24 september 2013 concerning statistics on interest rates applied by monetary financial institutions (recast) (ecb/2013/34) (oj l 297, 7.11.2013, p. 51) 31 march 2016 (2) amended by: 173 regulation (eu) no 756/2014 of the european central bank of 8 july 2014 ecb/2014/30 amending regulation (eu) no 1072/2013 (ecb/2013/34) concerning statistics on interest rates applied by monetary financial institutions (ecb/2014/30) (oj l 205, 12.7.2014, p. 14) 174 guideline of the european central bank ecb/2014/15 of 4 april 2014 on monetary and financial statistics (recast) (oj l 340, 26.11.2014, p. 1) 31 march 2016 (2) amended by: 175 guideline (eu) 2015/571 of the european central bank of 6 november 2014 amending guideline ecb/2014/15 on monetary and financial statistics (ecb/2014/43) (oj l 93, 9.4.2015, p. 82) 176 guideline (eu) 2016/450 of the european central bank of 4 december 2015 amending guideline ecb/2014/15 on monetary and financial statistics (ecb/2015/44) (oj l 86, 1.4.2016, p. 42) 31 march 2017 (4) 177 guideline (eu) 2017/148 of the european central bank of 16 december 2016 amending guideline ecb/2014/15 on monetary and financial statistics (ecb/2016/45) (oj l 26, 31.1.2017, p. 1) 1 december 2017 (5) 178 guideline (eu) 2018/877 of the european central bank of 1 june 2018 amending guideline ecb/2014/15 on monetary and financial statistics (ecb/2018/17) (oj l 154, 18.6.2018, p. 22) 1 october 2019 (6) (*1) as agreed under the template on simplified statistical reporting. (1) the joint committee of 2013 agreed on these deadlines pursuant to article 8(4) of the monetary agreement of 30 june 2011 between the european union and the principality of andorra. (2) the joint committee of 2014 agreed on these deadlines pursuant to article 8(4) of the monetary agreement of 30 june 2011 between the european union and the principality of andorra. (3) the joint committee of 2015 agreed on these deadlines pursuant to article 8(4) of the monetary agreement of 30 june 2011 between the european union and the principality of andorra. (4) the joint committee of 2016 agreed on these deadlines pursuant to article 8(4) of the monetary agreement of 30 june 2011 between the european union and the principality of andorra. (5) the joint committee of 2017 agreed on these deadlines pursuant to article 8(4) of the monetary agreement of 30 june 2011 between the european union and the principality of andorra. (6) the joint committee of 2018 agreed on these deadlines pursuant to article 8(4) of the monetary agreement of 30 june 2011 between the european union and the principality of andorra.

name: council decision (eu) 2019/524 of 21 march 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the european union within the joint committee established by the strategic partnership agreement between the european union and its member states, of the one part, and japan, of the other part, as regards the adoption of rules of procedure for the joint committee type: decision subject matter: politics and public safety; asia and oceania; european construction; cooperation policy; eu institutions and european civil service date published: 2019-03-28 28.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 86/66 council decision (eu) 2019/524 of 21 march 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the european union within the joint committee established by the strategic partnership agreement between the european union and its member states, of the one part, and japan, of the other part, as regards the adoption of rules of procedure for the joint committee the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on european union, and in particular article 37 thereof, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 212(1), in conjunction with article 218(9), thereof, having regard to the proposal from the european commission, whereas: (1) the strategic partnership agreement between the european union and its member states, of the one part, and japan, of the other part (1), (the agreement), was signed in tokyo on 17 july 2018 and has been provisionally applied since 1 february 2019. (2) the agreement establishes a joint committee to coordinate the overall partnership which is built upon the agreement (the joint committee) and provides that the joint committee is to adopt its own rules of procedure (rules of procedure). (3) the rules of procedure should be adopted as soon as possible in order to ensure the effective implementation of the agreement. (4) it is appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the union's behalf within the joint committee, as the rules of procedure will determine the functioning of the joint committee, which is responsible for administering the agreement and ensuring its proper implementation. (5) the position of the union within the joint committee should therefore be to support the adoption of the attached draft decision, has adopted this decision: article 1 the position to be taken on the union's behalf in the first meeting of the joint committee established pursuant to article 42 of the strategic partnership agreement between the european union and its member states, of the one part, and japan, of the other part, as regards the adoption of the joint committee's rules of procedure, shall be to support the adoption by the joint committee of its rules of procedure as set out in the draft decision of the joint committee attached to this decision. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at brussels, 21 march 2019. for the council the president g. ciamba (1) oj l 216, 24.8.2018, p. 4. decision no 1/2019 of the joint committee established by the eu-japan strategic partnership agreement of adopting its rules of procedure the joint committee, having regard to the strategic partnership agreement between the european union and its member states, of the one part, and japan, of the other part (1) (the agreement), and in particular article 42 thereof, whereas: (1) parts of the agreement have been applied pending entry into force since 1 february 2019. (2) in order to ensure the effective application pending entry into force of the agreement, the joint committee should be established as soon as possible, (3) pursuant to article 42 paragraph 5 of the agreement, the joint committee should therefore adopt its rules of procedure, has adopted this decision: 1. the rules of procedure of the joint committee, as set out in the annex, are hereby adopted. 2. the decision will enter into effect on the date of its adoption. signed at , for the joint committee the co-chairs (1) oj eu l xxx, xx.xx.xxxx, p. x. annex to decision no 1/2019 strategic partnership agreement between the european union and its member states, of the one part, and japan, of the other part rules of procedure of the joint committee article 1 tasks and composition 1. the joint committee will perform the tasks provided for in article 42 of the strategic partnership agreement between the european union and its member states, hereinafter referred to as the union party, of the one part, and japan, of the other part (the agreement). 2. the joint committee will be composed of representatives of the parties. article 2 chair the joint committee will be co-chaired by the representatives of the union party of the one part, and japan, of the other part. hereinafter referred to collectively as the parties and individually as the party. article 3 meetings 1. the joint committee will normally meet once a year in tokyo and brussels alternately, on a date fixed by consensus. it will also meet at the request of either party by consensus. 2. the joint committee will normally meet at the level of senior official, unless otherwise decided by the parties. article 4 publicity unless otherwise decided by the parties, meetings of the joint committee will not be public. article 5 secretaries a representative of the european external action service and a representative of the ministry of foreign affairs of japan will act jointly as secretaries of the joint committee. all communications to and from the co-chairs of the joint committee will be forwarded to the secretaries. article 6 participants 1. before each meeting, the co-chairs will be informed, through the secretaries, of the intended composition of the delegation of each party. 2. where appropriate and by consensus, experts or representatives of relevant entities may be invited to attend joint committee meetings as observers or in order to provide information on a particular subject. article 7 agendas for meetings 1. the co-chairs will draw up a provisional agenda for each meeting. 2. the provisional agenda will be set no later than fifteen days before the beginning of the meeting. 3. the final agenda will be adopted by the joint committee at the beginning of each meeting. items other than those on the provisional agenda may be placed on the agenda if the parties so decide. 4. the co-chairs may decide to shorten the time limits referred to in paragraph 2 where required. article 8 minutes 1. the secretaries will jointly produce minutes of each meeting, as soon as possible but not later than two months from the end of each meeting, unless otherwise decided by consensus. the draft minutes will include, as a general rule, the final agenda and a summary of the discussions under each agenda item. 2. the draft minutes will be approved in writing by the parties as soon as possible but no later than two months after the end of each meeting unless otherwise decided by consensus. article 9 decisions and recommendations 1. within its functions and tasks pursuant to article 42 of the agreement, the joint committee will make recommendations and adopt decisions, where appropriate. these will be entitled recommendation or decision, followed by a serial number, the date of their adoption and a description of the subject matter. each recommendation or decision will state the date of its entry into effect. 2. the joint committee makes recommendations and adopts decisions by consensus. 3. the joint committee may decide to make recommendations and adopt decisions by means of a written procedure through an exchange of notes between the co-chairs of the joint committee. 4. recommendations and decisions of the joint committee will be adopted in writing by the co-chairs. 5. each party may decide to publish the joint committee's recommendations and decisions in any appropriate medium. article 10 expenses 1. each party will meet any expenses it incurs as a result of participating in the meetings of the joint committee with regard to staff, travel, and subsistence expenditure as well as postal and telecommunications expenditure. 2. expenditure in connection with the organisation of meetings and the reproduction of documents will be borne by the party hosting the meeting. article 11 working groups 1. the joint committee may decide to set up working groups to assist it in carrying out its tasks. 2. the joint committee may decide to abolish any working group that it has established or to determine or modify its terms of reference. 3. the working groups will report to the joint committee after each of their meetings. article 12 modification of the rules of procedure the parties may modify the rules of procedure in line with article 9.

name: council decision (eu) 2019/485 of 5 march 2019 on the conclusion of the relevant agreements under article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services with argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, the separate customs territory of taiwan, penghu, kinmen and matsu (chinese taipei), colombia, cuba, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, the philippines, switzerland and the united states, on the necessary compensatory adjustments resulting from the accession of czechia, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, austria, poland, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden to the european union joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and australia, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and argentina, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and brazil, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and canada, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and china, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and colombia, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and cuba, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and ecuador, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and hong kong, china, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and india, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and japan, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and the republic of korea, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and new zealand, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and the philippines, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and switzerland, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and the separate customs territory of taiwan, penghu, kinmen and matsu, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and the united states of america, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the gats (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities type: decision subject matter: international affairs; international trade; economic geography; world organisations; european construction; cooperation policy date published: 2019-03-28 28.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 87/1 council decision (eu) 2019/485 of 5 march 2019 on the conclusion of the relevant agreements under article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services with argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, the separate customs territory of taiwan, penghu, kinmen and matsu (chinese taipei), colombia, cuba, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, the philippines, switzerland and the united states, on the necessary compensatory adjustments resulting from the accession of czechia, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, austria, poland, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden to the european union the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 91, article 100(2), and the first subparagraph of article 207(4), in conjunction with point (v) of article 218(6)(a) thereof, having regard to the proposal from the european commission, having regard to the consent of the european parliament (1), whereas: (1) the act of accession of austria, finland and sweden entered into force on 1 january 1995. (2) the act of accession of czechia, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, poland, slovenia and slovakia entered into force on 1 may 2004. (3) pursuant to article xx of the general agreement on trade in services (gats), wto members set out in a schedule the specific commitments they undertake under part iii of gats. (4) the current schedule of the union and its member states only covers the specific commitments related to the twelve member states of 1994. the individual schedules of specific commitments of the member states that have joined the union in 1995 and in 2004 (the acceding member states) were adopted prior to their accession. (5) in order to ensure that the acceding member states are covered by limitations included in the list of specific commitments of the union and to ensure consistency with the acquis communautaire, it is necessary to modify or withdraw certain specific commitments included in the list of specific commitments of the union and in the lists of specific commitments of the acceding member states. (6) with a view to present a consolidated schedule, on 28 may 2004, the union submitted a communication pursuant to article v of gats whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw certain specific commitments included in its own schedule and in those of the acceding member states, pursuant to article v:5 of gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:l(b) of gats. (7) following the submission of the notification and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of gats, 18 wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, the separate customs territory of taiwan, penghu, kinmen and matsu (chinese taipei), colombia, cuba, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, the philippines, switzerland, uruguay and the united states (the affected wto members) submitted claims of interest. (8) the commission conducted negotiations with the affected wto members. as a result of those negotiations, an agreement was reached on compensatory adjustments related to the modifications and withdrawals notified on 28 may 2004. (9) following the conclusion of the negotiations, in accordance with the council conclusions of 26 july 2006, the commission was authorised to sign the respective agreements with each of the affected wto members concerned (the agreements). with a view to launching the certification procedure provided for by the applicable wto rules, on 14 september 2006, the commission transmitted the draft consolidated schedule to the wto secretariat. the certification was concluded on 15 december 2006. (10) the agreed compensatory adjustments constitute a satisfactory and balanced outcome of the negotiations. the agreements should therefore be approved on behalf of the union, has adopted this decision: article 1 1. the agreements with argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, the separate customs territory of taiwan, penghu, kinmen and matsu (chinese taipei), colombia, cuba, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, the philippines, switzerland and the united states, on the necessary compensatory adjustments under article xxi of gats resulting from the accession of czechia, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, austria, poland, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden to the union, are hereby approved on behalf of the union. 2. the agreements referred to in paragraph 1 are attached to this decision. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at brussels, 5 march 2019. for the council the president g.l. gavrilescu (1) consent of 13 february 2019 (not yet published in the official journal). joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and australia, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications, pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. following the submission of each communication, australia submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/164 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/225 with regard to s/secret/9). the ec and australia entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). during such negotiations, the ec and australia have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the withdrawals and modifications contained in document s/secret/8. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and australia was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. the report on the result of these negotiations, which is attached to this letter, includes (1) the proposed modifications in the notifications referred to above, (2) the agreed compensatory adjustments with regard to the modifications or withdrawals notified in s/secret/8, and (3) the draft consolidated schedule of specific commitments that results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and australia. this letter and annex i and ii of the report attached to it constitute the agreement between the ec and australia with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (1). the agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. the agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. report on the result of the negotiations conducted in accordance of article xxi:2(a) of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the gats (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999), the ec submits the following report: 1. on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications (hereafter "the proposed modifications"), pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. the proposed modifications are contained in annex i. 2. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/8, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, eighteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, chinese taipei, colombia, cuba, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, the philippines, switzerland, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 3. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/9, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, fourteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, colombia, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 4. australia submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/164 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/225 with regard to s/secret/9. the ec and australia entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. 5. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). 6. during such negotiations, the ec and australia have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the modifications and withdrawals contained in document s/secret/8. annex i and ii of this report, together with the joint letter to which it is attached, constitute the agreement between the ec and australia with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (2). this agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. this agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. 7. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and australia was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. 8. in view of the foregoing, the proposed modifications and the agreed compensatory adjustments are incorporated into the ec's draft gats consolidated schedule, which results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and australia. 9. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. (1) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). (2) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). annex i a) modifications notified in document s/secret/8 horizontal commitments market access entry (page 9): in all ec member states services considered as public utilities at a national or local level may be subject to public monopolies or to exclusive rights granted to private operators . this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, austria, poland, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on branches, agencies and representative offices under mode 3 (pages 9 and 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidiaries under mode 3 (page 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, poland, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidies under mode 3 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, austria, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden included only part of the limitations on subsidies on mode 3 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. these limitations are now extended to these member states. national treatment limitation on subsidies under mode 4 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, hungary, malta and slovakia did not include the limitation on subsidies under mode 4 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. this limitation is now extended to these member states. cyprus' market access commitments on mode 4. these commitments are withdrawn. market access entry on mode 4 - intra-company transfers (ict) (page 26). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, latvia, lithuania, hungary, poland and slovakia did not include the limitation that the receiving entity must be effectively providing like services in the territory of the community member state concerned. this limitation is now extended to these member states. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) service sellers (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of poland did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public. this limitation is now extended to this member state. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) establishment of commercial presence (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of lithuania did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public or supplying services. this limitation is now extended to this member state. lithuanias market access commitments on mode 4 business visitors (bv) (page 32). these commitments are partially withdrawn. latvias market access commitment on mode 4 contractual services suppliers (css) (page 33). the schedule of specific commitments of latvia did not include the limitation that the temporary entry and stay within the member state concerned shall be for a period of not more than three months in any 12 months period. this limitation is now extended to this member state. sectoral commitments rental/leasing services without operators - relating to aircraft (page 95). the market access limitation under mode 2 is extended to estonia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia, finland and sweden and the market access limitation under mode 3 is extended to estonia, hungary and austria. services incidental to manufacturing (pages 109 and 110). the commitments included in the schedule of latvia, lithuania and austria are withdrawn. education services (page 156): limitation to only privately funded services . this limitation was not included in the schedule of estonia, latvia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia (only not included with regard to adult education services) and slovakia. this limitation is now extended to these member states. in the case of slovenia, such an extension only refers to adult education services. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (pages 193, 213 and 217). the market access limitations indicating that the establishment of a specialised management company is required to perform the activities of management of unit trusts and investment companies and that only firms having their registered office in the community can act as depositories of the assets of investment funds , both under mode 1 and 3, were not included in the schedule of czech republic as regards mode 3, estonia (not included in mode 1 nor in mode 3), latvia as regards mode 3, lithuania as regards mode 1, hungary as regards mode 3 and slovakia as regards mode 3. these limitations are now extended to these member states. space transport. the commitment included in the schedule of austria is withdrawn. air transport - rental of aircraft with crew (page 246). two market access limitations (one under modes 1 and 2 and another one under mode 3) are introduced for poland. air transport - sales and marketing (pages 247 and 248). the schedule of specific commitments of estonia did not include the national treatment limitation on distribution through crs of air transport services provided by crs parent carrier. air transport - computer reservations system (page 248). the schedule of specific commitments of hungary did not include the national treatment limitation on the obligations of parent or participating carriers in respect of a crs controlled by an air carrier of one or more third countries. services auxiliary to all modes of transport - cargo handling services (page 259). a market access limitation under mode 3 has been introduced for estonia, latvia and lithuania. b) modifications notified in document s/secret/9 horizontal commitments cyprus' and malta's commitments on mode 4 under national treatment (pages 25, 29 and 32 of s/secret/8). these commitments are withdrawn. sectoral commitments computer and related services - a)consultancy services related to the installation of computer hardware (cpc 841) (page 82) - b) software implementation services (cpc 842) (page 83) - c) data processing services (cpc 843) (page 85) - d) data base services (cpc 844) (page 86). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. research and development services - b) r & d services on social sciences and humanities (cpc 852) (pages 89 and 90). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. insurance and insurance-related services - (i) direct insurance (including co-insurance): (a) life and (b) non-life (pages 211 and 212). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (x) (e) transferable securities (page 223). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. hotels, restaurants and catering (cpc 641,642 and 643) (page 232). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. travel agencies and tour operators services (cpc 7471) (pages 233 and 234). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. maritime transport services - excluding cabotage transport - (a) passenger transportation (cpc 7211); (b) freight transportation (cpc 7212) (page 242). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. annex ii compensation by the ec mode 3 horizontal limitation on public utilities footnote on coverage indicating that this limitation does not apply to telecommunication and computer and related services. mode 3 horizontal limitations on investment removal of the national treatment limitation for at in mode 3 on branches of foreign joint stock companies (aktiengesellschaften) and limited liability companies (gesellschaften mit beschr nkter haftung). mode 4 for intra-corporate transferees and business visitors market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in the horizontal section and in the sector-specific section in the sectors where cy and mt have undertaken mode 3 commitments. professional services - engineering services (cpc 8672) market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 2 market access commitments by cy, cz, mt & sk in mode 3 national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 3 removal of the market access limitation for pt in mode 3 professional services - integrated engineering services (cpc 8673): removal of the ent applied on mode 4/css by the uk market access and national treatment commitments by sk in mode 3 professional services - urban planning and landscape architectural services (cpc 8674): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, cz, mt, pl, si & sk in mode 3. market access and national treatment commitments by hu on landscape architectural services in mode 2. computer and related services - addition of a clarificatory footnote. market access and national treatment commitments by hu in modes 1, 2 & 3 for cpc 845 and 849 improved conditions for css/mode 4 by se for computer and related services in the horizontal section and new commitments by se for css/mode 4 for cpc 845 and 849. advertising services (cpc 871): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, mt & pl in mode 1 telecommunication services new and improved commitments by the entire ec as offered in its revised dda offer. a clarification from fi that its three mode 3 horizontal limitations on legal entities under market access, on subsidiaries, branches, agencies and representative offices under national treatment, and on investment under market access do not apply to telecommunications services. a clarificatory footnote indicating that sub-sectors 2.c.h) to 2.c.m) of the services sectoral classification list contained in mtn,gns/w/120 (value-added services) and sub-sectors 2.c.a) to 2.c.g) of that list are included here. sub-sector 2.c.o) of that list is also included here to the extent that it falls under this definition. for the purpose of this schedule, subsector 2c.n of that list (on-line information and/or data processing) is reflected in this schedule of commitments under 1.b (computer and related services). financial services (insurance services): removal of part of the market access limitations for sk in mode 3 financial services (banking) fi: change in mode 3 permanent residency requirements ( at least one of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the managing director shall have their permanent residence in the european community instead of at least one half of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the delegates, the managing director, the holder of the procuration and the person entitled to sign in the name of the credit institution shall have their place of residence in the european community ). hotels, restaurants and catering new (less restrictive) language for it's ent in mode 3 on bars, cafes and restaurants, including a commitment on its non-discriminatory nature. travel agencies and tour operators services removal of the ent applied on mode 3 by the cz hairdressing services market access and national treatment commitments by cz, fi, hu and sk in modes 2&3 the following abbreviations are used to indicate the member states: at austria be belgium cy cyprus cz czech republic de germany dk denmark ee estonia el greece es spain fi finland fr france hu hungary ie ireland it italy lt lithuania lu luxembourg lv latvia mt malta nl the netherlands pl poland pt portugal se sweden si slovenia sk slovak republic uk united kingdom joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and argentina, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications, pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. following the submission of each communication, argentina submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/175 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/228 with regard to s/secret/9). the ec and argentina entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). during such negotiations, the ec and argentina have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the withdrawals and modifications contained in document s/secret/8. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and argentina was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. the report on the result of these negotiations, which is attached to this letter, includes (1) the proposed modifications in the notifications referred to above, (2) the agreed compensatory adjustments with regard to the modifications or withdrawals notified in s/secret/8, and (3) the draft consolidated schedule of specific commitments that results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and argentina. this letter and annex i and ii of the report attached to it constitute the agreement between the ec and argentina with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (1). the agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. the agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. report on the result of the negotiations conducted in accordance of article xxi:2(a) of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the gats (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999), the ec submits the following report: 1. on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications (hereafter "the proposed modifications"), pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. the proposed modifications are contained in annex i. 2. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/8, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, eighteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, chinese taipei, colombia, cuba, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, the philippines, switzerland, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 3. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/9, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, fourteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, colombia, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 4. argentina submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/175 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/228 with regard to s/secret/9). the ec and argentina entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. 5. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). 6. during such negotiations, the ec and argentina have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the modifications and withdrawals contained in document s/secret/8. annex i and ii of this report, together with the joint letter to which it is attached, constitute the agreement between the ec and argentina with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (2). this agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. this agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. 7. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and argentina was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. 8. in view of the foregoing, the proposed modifications and the agreed compensatory adjustments are incorporated into the ec's draft gats consolidated schedule, which results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and the argentina. 9. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. (1) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). (2) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). annex i a) modifications notified in document s/secret/8 horizontal commitments market access entry (page 9): in all ec member states services considered as public utilities at a national or local level may be subject to public monopolies or to exclusive rights granted to private operators . this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, austria, poland, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on branches, agencies and representative offices under mode 3 (pages 9 and 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidiaries under mode 3 (page 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, poland, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidies under mode 3 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, austria, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden included only part of the limitations on subsidies on mode 3 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. these limitations are now extended to these member states. national treatment limitation on subsidies under mode 4 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, hungary, malta and slovakia did not include the limitation on subsidies under mode 4 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. this limitation is now extended to these member states. cyprus' market access commitments on mode 4. these commitments are withdrawn. market access entry on mode 4 - intra-company transfers (ict) (page 26). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, latvia, lithuania, hungary, poland and slovakia did not include the limitation that the receiving entity must be effectively providing like services in the territory of the community member state concerned. this limitation is now extended to these member states. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) service sellers (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of poland did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public. this limitation is now extended to this member state. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) establishment of commercial presence (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of lithuania did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public or supplying services. this limitation is now extended to this member state. lithuanias market access commitments on mode 4 business visitors (bv) (page 32). these commitments are partially withdrawn. latvias market access commitment on mode 4 contractual services suppliers (css) (page 33). the schedule of specific commitments of latvia did not include the limitation that the temporary entry and stay within the member state concerned shall be for a period of not more than three months in any 12 months period. this limitation is now extended to this member state. sectoral commitments rental/leasing services without operators - relating to aircraft (page 95). the market access limitation under mode 2 is extended to estonia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia, finland and sweden and the market access limitation under mode 3 is extended to estonia, hungary and austria. services incidental to manufacturing (pages 109 and 110). the commitments included in the schedule of latvia, lithuania and austria are withdrawn. education services (page 156): limitation to only privately funded services . this limitation was not included in the schedule of estonia, latvia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia (only not included with regard to adult education services) and slovakia. this limitation is now extended to these member states. in the case of slovenia, such an extension only refers to adult education services. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (pages 193, 213 and 217). the market access limitations indicating that the establishment of a specialised management company is required to perform the activities of management of unit trusts and investment companies and that only firms having their registered office in the community can act as depositories of the assets of investment funds , both under mode 1 and 3, were not included in the schedule of czech republic as regards mode 3, estonia (not included in mode 1 nor in mode 3), latvia as regards mode 3, lithuania as regards mode 1, hungary as regards mode 3 and slovakia as regards mode 3. these limitations are now extended to these member states. space transport. the commitment included in the schedule of austria is withdrawn. air transport - rental of aircraft with crew (page 246). two market access limitations (one under modes 1 and 2 and another one under mode 3) are introduced for poland. air transport - sales and marketing (pages 247 and 248). the schedule of specific commitments of estonia did not include the national treatment limitation on distribution through crs of air transport services provided by crs parent carrier. air transport - computer reservations system (page 248). the schedule of specific commitments of hungary did not include the national treatment limitation on the obligations of parent or participating carriers in respect of a crs controlled by an air carrier of one or more third countries. services auxiliary to all modes of transport - cargo handling services (page 259). a market access limitation under mode 3 has been introduced for estonia, latvia and lithuania. b) modifications notified in document s/secret/9 horizontal commitments cyprus' and malta's commitments on mode 4 under national treatment (pages 25, 29 and 32 of s/secret/8). these commitments are withdrawn. sectoral commitments computer and related services - a)consultancy services related to the installation of computer hardware (cpc 841) (page 82) - b) software implementation services (cpc 842) (page 83) - c) data processing services (cpc 843) (page 85) - d) data base services (cpc 844) (page 86). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. research and development services - b) r & d services on social sciences and humanities (cpc 852) (pages 89 and 90). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. insurance and insurance-related services - (i) direct insurance (including co-insurance): (a) life and (b) non-life (pages 211 and 212). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (x) (e) transferable securities (page 223). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. hotels, restaurants and catering (cpc 641,642 and 643) (page 232). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. travel agencies and tour operators services (cpc 7471) (pages 233 and 234). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. maritime transport services - excluding cabotage transport - (a) passenger transportation (cpc 7211); (b) freight transportation (cpc 7212) (page 242). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. annex ii compensation by the ec mode 3 horizontal limitation on public utilities footnote on coverage indicating that this limitation does not apply to telecommunication and computer and related services. mode 3 horizontal limitations on investment removal of the national treatment limitation for at in mode 3 on branches of foreign joint stock companies (aktiengesellschaften) and limited liability companies (gesellschaften mit beschr nkter haftung). mode 4 for intra-corporate transferees and business visitors market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in the horizontal section and in the sector-specific section in the sectors where cy and mt have undertaken mode 3 commitments. professional services - engineering services (cpc 8 672) market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 2 market access commitments by cy, cz, mt & sk in mode 3 national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 3 removal of the market access limitation for pt in mode 3 professional services - integrated engineering services (cpc 8 673): removal of the ent applied on mode 4/css by the uk market access and national treatment commitments by sk in mode 3 professional services - urban planning and landscape architectural services (cpc 8 674): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, cz, mt, pl, si & sk in mode 3. market access and national treatment commitments by hu on landscape architectural services in mode 2. computer and related services - addition of a clarificatory footnote. market access and national treatment commitments by hu in modes 1, 2 & 3 for cpc 845 and 849 improved conditions for css/mode 4 by se for computer and related services in the horizontal section and new commitments by se for css/mode 4 for cpc 845 and 849. advertising services (cpc 871): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, mt & pl in mode 1 telecommunication services new and improved commitments by the entire ec as offered in its revised dda offer. a clarification from fi that its three mode 3 horizontal limitations on legal entities under market access, on subsidiaries, branches, agencies and representative offices under national treatment, and on investment under market access do not apply to telecommunications services. a clarificatory footnote indicating that sub-sectors 2.c.h) to 2.c.m) of the services sectoral classification list contained in mtn,gns/w/120 (value-added services) and sub-sectors 2.c.a) to 2.c.g) of that list are included here. sub-sector 2.c.o) of that list is also included here to the extent that it falls under this definition. for the purpose of this schedule, subsector 2c.n of that list (on-line information and/or data processing) is reflected in this schedule of commitments under 1.b (computer and related services). financial services (insurance services): removal of part of the market access limitations for sk in mode 3 financial services (banking) fi: change in mode 3 permanent residency requirements ( at least one of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the managing director shall have their permanent residence in the european community instead of at least one half of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the delegates, the managing director, the holder of the procuration and the person entitled to sign in the name of the credit institution shall have their place of residence in the european community ). hotels, restaurants and catering new (less restrictive) language for it's ent in mode 3 on bars, cafes and restaurants, including a commitment on its non-discriminatory nature. travel agencies and tour operators services removal of the ent applied on mode 3 by the cz hairdressing services market access and national treatment commitments by cz, fi, hu and sk in modes 2&3 the following abbreviations are used to indicate the member states: at austria be belgium cy cyprus cz czech republic de germany dk denmark ee estonia el greece es spain fi finland fr france hu hungary ie ireland it italy lt lithuania lu luxembourg lv latvia mt malta nl the netherlands pl poland pt portugal se sweden si slovenia sk slovak republic uk united kingdom joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and brazil, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications, pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. following the submission of each communication, brazil submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/171 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/224 with regard to s/secret/9). the ec and brazil entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). during such negotiations, the ec and brazil have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the withdrawals and modifications contained in document s/secret/8. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and brazil was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. the report on the result of these negotiations, which is attached to this letter, includes (1) the proposed modifications in the notifications referred to above, (2) the agreed compensatory adjustments with regard to the modifications or withdrawals notified in s/secret/8, and (3) the draft consolidated schedule of specific commitments that results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and brazil. this letter and annex i and ii of the report attached to it constitute the agreement between the ec and brazil with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (1). the agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. the agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. report on the result of the negotiations conducted in accordance of article xxi:2(a) of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the gats (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999), the ec submits the following report: 1. on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications (hereafter "the proposed modifications"), pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. the proposed modifications are contained in annex i. 2. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/8, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, eighteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, chinese taipei, colombia, cuba, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, the philippines, switzerland, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 3. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/9, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, fourteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, colombia, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 4. brazil submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/171 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/224 with regard to s/secret/9). the ec and brazil entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. 5. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). 6. during such negotiations, the ec and brazil have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the modifications and withdrawals contained in document s/secret/8. annex i and ii of this report, together with the joint letter to which it is attached, constitute the agreement between the ec and brazil with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (2). this agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. this agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. 7. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and brazil was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. 8. in view of the foregoing, the proposed modifications and the agreed compensatory adjustments are incorporated into the ec's draft gats consolidated schedule, which results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and the brazil. 9. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. (1) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). (2) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). annex i a) modifications notified in document s/secret/8 horizontal commitments market access entry (page 9): in all ec member states services considered as public utilities at a national or local level may be subject to public monopolies or to exclusive rights granted to private operators . this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, austria, poland, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on branches, agencies and representative offices under mode 3 (pages 9 and 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidiaries under mode 3 (page 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, poland, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidies under mode 3 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, austria, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden included only part of the limitations on subsidies on mode 3 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. these limitations are now extended to these member states. national treatment limitation on subsidies under mode 4 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, hungary, malta and slovakia did not include the limitation on subsidies under mode 4 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. this limitation is now extended to these member states. cyprus' market access commitments on mode 4. these commitments are withdrawn. market access entry on mode 4 - intra-company transfers (ict) (page 26). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, latvia, lithuania, hungary, poland and slovakia did not include the limitation that the receiving entity must be effectively providing like services in the territory of the community member state concerned. this limitation is now extended to these member states. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) service sellers (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of poland did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public. this limitation is now extended to this member state. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) establishment of commercial presence (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of lithuania did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public or supplying services. this limitation is now extended to this member state. lithuanias market access commitments on mode 4 business visitors (bv) (page 32). these commitments are partially withdrawn. latvias market access commitment on mode 4 contractual services suppliers (css) (page 33). the schedule of specific commitments of latvia did not include the limitation that the temporary entry and stay within the member state concerned shall be for a period of not more than three months in any 12 months period. this limitation is now extended to this member state. sectoral commitments rental/leasing services without operators - relating to aircraft (page 95). the market access limitation under mode 2 is extended to estonia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia, finland and sweden and the market access limitation under mode 3 is extended to estonia, hungary and austria. services incidental to manufacturing (pages 109 and 110). the commitments included in the schedule of latvia, lithuania and austria are withdrawn. education services (page 156): limitation to only privately funded services . this limitation was not included in the schedule of estonia, latvia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia (only not included with regard to adult education services) and slovakia. this limitation is now extended to these member states. in the case of slovenia, such an extension only refers to adult education services. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (pages 193, 213 and 217). the market access limitations indicating that the establishment of a specialised management company is required to perform the activities of management of unit trusts and investment companies and that only firms having their registered office in the community can act as depositories of the assets of investment funds , both under mode 1 and 3, were not included in the schedule of czech republic as regards mode 3, estonia (not included in mode 1 nor in mode 3), latvia as regards mode 3, lithuania as regards mode 1, hungary as regards mode 3 and slovakia as regards mode 3. these limitations are now extended to these member states. space transport. the commitment included in the schedule of austria is withdrawn. air transport - rental of aircraft with crew (page 246). two market access limitations (one under modes 1 and 2 and another one under mode 3) are introduced for poland. air transport - sales and marketing (pages 247 and 248). the schedule of specific commitments of estonia did not include the national treatment limitation on distribution through crs of air transport services provided by crs parent carrier. air transport - computer reservations system (page 248). the schedule of specific commitments of hungary did not include the national treatment limitation on the obligations of parent or participating carriers in respect of a crs controlled by an air carrier of one or more third countries. services auxiliary to all modes of transport - cargo handling services (page 259). a market access limitation under mode 3 has been introduced for estonia, latvia and lithuania. b) modifications notified in document s/secret/9 horizontal commitments cyprus' and malta's commitments on mode 4 under national treatment (pages 25, 29 and 32 of s/secret/8). these commitments are withdrawn. sectoral commitments computer and related services - a)consultancy services related to the installation of computer hardware (cpc 841) (page 82) - b) software implementation services (cpc 842) (page 83) - c) data processing services (cpc 843) (page 85) - d) data base services (cpc 844) (page 86). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. research and development services - b) r & d services on social sciences and humanities (cpc 852) (pages 89 and 90). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. insurance and insurance-related services - (i) direct insurance (including co-insurance): (a) life and (b) non-life (pages 211 and 212). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (x) (e) transferable securities (page 223). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. hotels, restaurants and catering (cpc 641,642 and 643) (page 232). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. travel agencies and tour operators services (cpc 7471) (pages 233 and 234). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. maritime transport services - excluding cabotage transport - (a) passenger transportation (cpc 7211); (b) freight transportation (cpc 7212) (page 242). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. annex ii compensation by the ec mode 3 horizontal limitation on public utilities footnote on coverage indicating that this limitation does not apply to telecommunication and computer and related services. mode 3 horizontal limitations on investment removal of the national treatment limitation for at in mode 3 on branches of foreign joint stock companies (aktiengesellschaften) and limited liability companies (gesellschaften mit beschr nkter haftung). mode 4 for intra-corporate transferees and business visitors market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in the horizontal section and in the sector-specific section in the sectors where cy and mt have undertaken mode 3 commitments. professional services - engineering services (cpc 8672) market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 2 market access commitments by cy, cz, mt & sk in mode 3 national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 3 removal of the market access limitation for pt in mode 3 professional services - integrated engineering services (cpc 8673): removal of the ent applied on mode 4/css by the uk market access and national treatment commitments by sk in mode 3 professional services - urban planning and landscape architectural services (cpc 8674): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, cz, mt, pl, si & sk in mode 3. market access and national treatment commitments by hu on landscape architectural services in mode 2. computer and related services - addition of a clarificatory footnote. market access and national treatment commitments by hu in modes 1, 2 & 3 for cpc 845 and 849 improved conditions for css/mode 4 by se for computer and related services in the horizontal section and new commitments by se for css/mode 4 for cpc 845 and 849. advertising services (cpc 871): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, mt & pl in mode 1 telecommunication services new and improved commitments by the entire ec as offered in its revised dda offer. a clarification from fi that its three mode 3 horizontal limitations on legal entities under market access, on subsidiaries, branches, agencies and representative offices under national treatment, and on investment under market access do not apply to telecommunications services. a clarificatory footnote indicating that sub-sectors 2.c.h) to 2.c.m) of the services sectoral classification list contained in mtn,gns/w/120 (value-added services) and sub-sectors 2.c.a) to 2.c.g) of that list are included here. sub-sector 2.c.o) of that list is also included here to the extent that it falls under this definition. for the purpose of this schedule, subsector 2c.n of that list (on-line information and/or data processing) is reflected in this schedule of commitments under 1.b (computer and related services). financial services (insurance services): removal of part of the market access limitations for sk in mode 3 financial services (banking) fi: change in mode 3 permanent residency requirements ( at least one of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the managing director shall have their permanent residence in the european community instead of at least one half of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the delegates, the managing director, the holder of the procuration and the person entitled to sign in the name of the credit institution shall have their place of residence in the european community ). hotels, restaurants and catering new (less restrictive) language for it's ent in mode 3 on bars, cafes and restaurants, including a commitment on its non-discriminatory nature. travel agencies and tour operators services removal of the ent applied on mode 3 by the cz hairdressing services market access and national treatment commitments by cz, fi, hu and sk in modes 2&3 the following abbreviations are used to indicate the member states: at austria be belgium cy cyprus cz czech republic de germany dk denmark ee estonia el greece es spain fi finland fr france hu hungary ie ireland it italy lt lithuania lu luxembourg lv latvia mt malta nl the netherlands pl poland pt portugal se sweden si slovenia sk slovak republic uk united kingdom joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and canada, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications, pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. following the submission of each communication, canada submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/165 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/216 with regard to s/secret/9). the ec and canada entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). during such negotiations, the ec and canada have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the withdrawals and modifications contained in document s/secret/8. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and canada was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. the report on the result of these negotiations, which is attached to this letter, includes (1) the proposed modifications in the notifications referred to above, (2) the agreed compensatory adjustments with regard to the modifications or withdrawals notified in s/secret/8, and (3) the draft consolidated schedule of specific commitments that results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and canada. this letter and annex i and ii of the report attached to it constitute the agreement between the ec and canada with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (1). the agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. the agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. report on the result of the negotiations conducted in accordance of article xxi:2(a) of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the gats (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999), the ec submits the following report: 1. on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications (hereafter "the proposed modifications"), pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. the proposed modifications are contained in annex i. 2. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/8, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, eighteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, chinese taipei, colombia, cuba, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, the philippines, switzerland, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 3. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/9, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, fourteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, colombia, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 4. canada submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/165 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/216 with regard to s/secret/9). the ec and canada entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. 5. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). 6. during such negotiations, the ec and canada have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the modifications and withdrawals contained in document s/secret/8. annex i and ii of this report, together with the joint letter to which it is attached, constitute the agreement between the ec and canada with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (2). this agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. this agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. 7. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and canada was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. 8. in view of the foregoing, the proposed modifications and the agreed compensatory adjustments are incorporated into the ec's draft gats consolidated schedule, which results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and the canada. 9. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. (1) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). (2) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). annex i a) modifications notified in document s/secret/8 horizontal commitments market access entry (page 9): in all ec member states services considered as public utilities at a national or local level may be subject to public monopolies or to exclusive rights granted to private operators . this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, austria, poland, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on branches, agencies and representative offices under mode 3 (pages 9 and 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidiaries under mode 3 (page 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, poland, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidies under mode 3 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, austria, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden included only part of the limitations on subsidies on mode 3 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. these limitations are now extended to these member states. national treatment limitation on subsidies under mode 4 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, hungary, malta and slovakia did not include the limitation on subsidies under mode 4 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. this limitation is now extended to these member states. cyprus' market access commitments on mode 4. these commitments are withdrawn. market access entry on mode 4 - intra-company transfers (ict) (page 26). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, latvia, lithuania, hungary, poland and slovakia did not include the limitation that the receiving entity must be effectively providing like services in the territory of the community member state concerned. this limitation is now extended to these member states. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) service sellers (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of poland did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public. this limitation is now extended to this member state. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) establishment of commercial presence (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of lithuania did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public or supplying services. this limitation is now extended to this member state. lithuanias market access commitments on mode 4 business visitors (bv) (page 32). these commitments are partially withdrawn. latvias market access commitment on mode 4 contractual services suppliers (css) (page 33). the schedule of specific commitments of latvia did not include the limitation that the temporary entry and stay within the member state concerned shall be for a period of not more than three months in any 12 months period. this limitation is now extended to this member state. sectoral commitments rental/leasing services without operators - relating to aircraft (page 95). the market access limitation under mode 2 is extended to estonia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia, finland and sweden and the market access limitation under mode 3 is extended to estonia, hungary and austria. services incidental to manufacturing (pages 109 and 110). the commitments included in the schedule of latvia, lithuania and austria are withdrawn. education services (page 156): limitation to only privately funded services . this limitation was not included in the schedule of estonia, latvia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia (only not included with regard to adult education services) and slovakia. this limitation is now extended to these member states. in the case of slovenia, such an extension only refers to adult education services. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (pages 193, 213 and 217). the market access limitations indicating that the establishment of a specialised management company is required to perform the activities of management of unit trusts and investment companies and that only firms having their registered office in the community can act as depositories of the assets of investment funds , both under mode 1 and 3, were not included in the schedule of czech republic as regards mode 3, estonia (not included in mode 1 nor in mode 3), latvia as regards mode 3, lithuania as regards mode 1, hungary as regards mode 3 and slovakia as regards mode 3. these limitations are now extended to these member states. space transport. the commitment included in the schedule of austria is withdrawn. air transport - rental of aircraft with crew (page 246). two market access limitations (one under modes 1 and 2 and another one under mode 3) are introduced for poland. air transport - sales and marketing (pages 247 and 248). the schedule of specific commitments of estonia did not include the national treatment limitation on distribution through crs of air transport services provided by crs parent carrier. air transport - computer reservations system (page 248). the schedule of specific commitments of hungary did not include the national treatment limitation on the obligations of parent or participating carriers in respect of a crs controlled by an air carrier of one or more third countries. services auxiliary to all modes of transport - cargo handling services (page 259). a market access limitation under mode 3 has been introduced for estonia, latvia and lithuania. b) modifications notified in document s/secret/9 horizontal commitments cyprus' and malta's commitments on mode 4 under national treatment (pages 25, 29 and 32 of s/secret/8). these commitments are withdrawn. sectoral commitments computer and related services - a)consultancy services related to the installation of computer hardware (cpc 841) (page 82) - b) software implementation services (cpc 842) (page 83) - c) data processing services (cpc 843) (page 85) - d) data base services (cpc 844) (page 86). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. research and development services - b) r & d services on social sciences and humanities (cpc 852) (pages 89 and 90). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. insurance and insurance-related services - (i) direct insurance (including co-insurance): (a) life and (b) non-life (pages 211 and 212). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (x) (e) transferable securities (page 223). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. hotels, restaurants and catering (cpc 641,642 and 643) (page 232). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. travel agencies and tour operators services (cpc 7471) (pages 233 and 234). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. maritime transport services - excluding cabotage transport - (a) passenger transportation (cpc 7211); (b) freight transportation (cpc 7212) (page 242). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. annex ii compensation by the ec mode 3 horizontal limitation on public utilities footnote on coverage indicating that this limitation does not apply to telecommunication and computer and related services. mode 3 horizontal limitations on investment removal of the national treatment limitation for at in mode 3 on branches of foreign joint stock companies (aktiengesellschaften) and limited liability companies (gesellschaften mit beschr nkter haftung). mode 4 for intra-corporate transferees and business visitors market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in the horizontal section and in the sector-specific section in the sectors where cy and mt have undertaken mode 3 commitments. professional services - engineering services (cpc 8672) market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 2 market access commitments by cy, cz, mt & sk in mode 3 national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 3 removal of the market access limitation for pt in mode 3 professional services - integrated engineering services (cpc 8673): removal of the ent applied on mode 4/css by the uk market access and national treatment commitments by sk in mode 3 professional services - urban planning and landscape architectural services (cpc 8674): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, cz, mt, pl, si & sk in mode 3. market access and national treatment commitments by hu on landscape architectural services in mode 2. computer and related services - addition of a clarificatory footnote. market access and national treatment commitments by hu in modes 1, 2 & 3 for cpc 845 and 849 improved conditions for css/mode 4 by se for computer and related services in the horizontal section and new commitments by se for css/mode 4 for cpc 845 and 849. advertising services (cpc 871): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, mt & pl in mode 1 telecommunication services new and improved commitments by the entire ec as offered in its revised dda offer. a clarification from fi that its three mode 3 horizontal limitations on legal entities under market access, on subsidiaries, branches, agencies and representative offices under national treatment, and on investment under market access do not apply to telecommunications services. a clarificatory footnote indicating that sub-sectors 2.c.h) to 2.c.m) of the services sectoral classification list contained in mtn,gns/w/120 (value-added services) and sub-sectors 2.c.a) to 2.c.g) of that list are included here. sub-sector 2.c.o) of that list is also included here to the extent that it falls under this definition. for the purpose of this schedule, subsector 2c.n of that list (on-line information and/or data processing) is reflected in this schedule of commitments under 1.b (computer and related services). financial services (insurance services): removal of part of the market access limitations for sk in mode 3 financial services (banking) fi: change in mode 3 permanent residency requirements ( at least one of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the managing director shall have their permanent residence in the european community instead of at least one half of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the delegates, the managing director, the holder of the procuration and the person entitled to sign in the name of the credit institution shall have their place of residence in the europe community ). hotels, restaurants and catering new (less restrictive) language for it's ent in mode 3 on bars, cafes and restaurants, including a commitment on its non-discriminatory nature. travel agencies and tour operators services removal of the ent applied on mode 3 by the cz hairdressing services market access and national treatment commitments by cz, fi, hu and sk in modes 2&3 the following abbreviations are used to indicate the member states: at austria be belgium cy cyprus cz czech republic de germany dk denmark ee estonia el greece es spain fi finland fr france hu hungary ie ireland it italy lt lithuania lu luxembourg lv latvia mt malta nl the netherlands pl poland pt portugal se sweden si slovenia sk slovak republic uk united kingdom joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and china, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications, pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. following the submission of each communication, china submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/178 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/220 with regard to s/secret/9). the ec and china entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). during such negotiations, the ec and china have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the withdrawals and modifications contained in document s/secret/8. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and china was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. the report on the result of these negotiations, which is attached to this letter, includes (1) the proposed modifications in the notifications referred to above, (2) the agreed compensatory adjustments with regard to the modifications or withdrawals notified in s/secret/8, and (3) the draft consolidated schedule of specific commitments that results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and china. this letter and annex i and ii of the report attached to it constitute the agreement between the ec and china with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (1). the agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. the agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. report on the result of the negotiations conducted in accordance of article xxi:2(a) of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the gats (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999), the ec submits the following report: 1. on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications (hereafter "the proposed modifications"), pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. the proposed modifications are contained in annex i. 2. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/8, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, eighteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, chinese taipei, colombia, cuba, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, the philippines, switzerland, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 3. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/9, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, fourteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, colombia, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 4. china submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/178 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/220 with regard to s/secret/9). the ec and china entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. 5. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). 6. during such negotiations, the ec and china have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the modifications and withdrawals contained in document s/secret/8. annex i and ii of this report, together with the joint letter to which it is attached, constitute the agreement between the ec and china with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (2). this agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. this agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. 7. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and china was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. 8. in view of the foregoing, the proposed modifications and the agreed compensatory adjustments are incorporated into the ec's draft gats consolidated schedule, which results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and the china. 9. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. (1) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). (2) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). annex i a) modifications notified in document s/secret/8 horizontal commitments market access entry (page 9): in all ec member states services considered as public utilities at a national or local level may be subject to public monopolies or to exclusive rights granted to private operators . this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, austria, poland, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on branches, agencies and representative offices under mode 3 (pages 9 and 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidiaries under mode 3 (page 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, poland, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidies under mode 3 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, austria, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden included only part of the limitations on subsidies on mode 3 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. these limitations are now extended to these member states. national treatment limitation on subsidies under mode 4 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, hungary, malta and slovakia did not include the limitation on subsidies under mode 4 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. this limitation is now extended to these member states. cyprus' market access commitments on mode 4. these commitments are withdrawn. market access entry on mode 4 - intra-company transfers (ict) (page 26). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, latvia, lithuania, hungary, poland and slovakia did not include the limitation that the receiving entity must be effectively providing like services in the territory of the community member state concerned. this limitation is now extended to these member states. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) service sellers (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of poland did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public. this limitation is now extended to this member state. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) establishment of commercial presence (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of lithuania did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public or supplying services. this limitation is now extended to this member state. lithuanias market access commitments on mode 4 business visitors (bv) (page 32). these commitments are partially withdrawn. latvias market access commitment on mode 4 contractual services suppliers (css) (page 33). the schedule of specific commitments of latvia did not include the limitation that the temporary entry and stay within the member state concerned shall be for a period of not more than three months in any 12 months period. this limitation is now extended to this member state. sectoral commitments rental/leasing services without operators - relating to aircraft (page 95). the market access limitation under mode 2 is extended to estonia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia, finland and sweden and the market access limitation under mode 3 is extended to estonia, hungary and austria. services incidental to manufacturing (pages 109 and 110). the commitments included in the schedule of latvia, lithuania and austria are withdrawn. education services (page 156): limitation to only privately funded services . this limitation was not included in the schedule of estonia, latvia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia (only not included with regard to adult education services) and slovakia. this limitation is now extended to these member states. in the case of slovenia, such an extension only refers to adult education services. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (pages 193, 213 and 217). the market access limitations indicating that the establishment of a specialised management company is required to perform the activities of management of unit trusts and investment companies and that only firms having their registered office in the community can act as depositories of the assets of investment funds , both under mode 1 and 3, were not included in the schedule of czech republic as regards mode 3, estonia (not included in mode 1 nor in mode 3), latvia as regards mode 3, lithuania as regards mode 1, hungary as regards mode 3 and slovakia as regards mode 3. these limitations are now extended to these member states. space transport. the commitment included in the schedule of austria is withdrawn. air transport - rental of aircraft with crew (page 246). two market access limitations (one under modes 1 and 2 and another one under mode 3) are introduced for poland. air transport - sales and marketing (pages 247 and 248). the schedule of specific commitments of estonia did not include the national treatment limitation on distribution through crs of air transport services provided by crs parent carrier. air transport - computer reservations system (page 248). the schedule of specific commitments of hungary did not include the national treatment limitation on the obligations of parent or participating carriers in respect of a crs controlled by an air carrier of one or more third countries. services auxiliary to all modes of transport - cargo handling services (page 259). a market access limitation under mode 3 has been introduced for estonia, latvia and lithuania. b) modifications notified in document s/secret/9 horizontal commitments cyprus' and malta's commitments on mode 4 under national treatment (pages 25, 29 and 32 of s/secret/8). these commitments are withdrawn. sectoral commitments computer and related services - a) consultancy services related to the installation of computer hardware (cpc 841) (page 82) - b) software implementation services (cpc 842) (page 83) -c) data processing services (cpc 843) (page 85) - d) data base services (cpc 844) (page 86). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. research and development services - b) r & d services on social sciences and humanities (cpc 852) (pages 89 and 90). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. insurance and insurance-related services - (i) direct insurance (including co-insurance): (a) life and (b) non-life (pages 211 and 212). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (x) (e) transferable securities (page 223). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. hotels, restaurants and catering (cpc 641,642 and 643) (page 232). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. travel agencies and tour operators services (cpc 7471) (pages 233 and 234). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. maritime transport services - excluding cabotage transport - (a) passenger transportation (cpc 7211); (b) freight transportation (cpc 7212) (page 242). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. annex ii compensation by the ec mode 3 horizontal limitation on public utilities footnote on coverage indicating that this limitation does not apply to telecommunication and computer and related services. mode 3 horizontal limitations on investment removal of the national treatment limitation for at in mode 3 on branches of foreign joint stock companies (aktiengesellschaften) and limited liability companies (gesellschaften mit beschr nkter haftung). mode 4 for intra-corporate transferees and business visitors market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in the horizontal section and in the sector-specific section in the sectors where cy and mt have undertaken mode 3 commitments. professional services - engineering services (cpc 8672) market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 2 market access commitments by cy, cz, mt & sk in mode 3 national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 3 removal of the market access limitation for pt in mode 3 professional services - integrated engineering services (cpc 8673): removal of the ent applied on mode 4/css by the uk market access and national treatment commitments by sk in mode 3 professional services - urban planning and landscape architectural services (cpc 8674): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, cz, mt, pl, si & sk in mode 3. market access and national treatment commitments by hu on landscape architectural services in mode 2. computer and related services - addition of a clarificatory footnote. market access and national treatment commitments by hu in modes 1, 2 & 3 for cpc 845 and 849 improved conditions for css/mode 4 by se for computer and related services in the horizontal section and new commitments by se for css/mode 4 for cpc 845 and 849. advertising services (cpc 871): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, mt & pl in mode 1 telecommunication services new and improved commitments by the entire ec as offered in its revised dda offer. a clarification from fi that its three mode 3 horizontal limitations on legal entities under market access, on subsidiaries, branches, agencies and representative offices under national treatment, and on investment under market access do not apply to telecommunications services. a clarificatory footnote indicating that sub-sectors 2.c.h) to 2.c.m) of the services sectoral classification list contained in mtn,gns/w/120 (value-added services) and sub-sectors 2.c.a) to 2.c.g) of that list are included here. sub-sector 2.c.o) of that list is also included here to the extent that it falls under this definition. for the purpose of this schedule, subsector 2c.n of that list (on-line information and/or data processing) is reflected in this schedule of commitments under 1.b (computer and related services). financial services (insurance services): removal of part of the market access limitations for sk in mode 3 financial services (banking) fi: change in mode 3 permanent residency requirements ( at least one of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the managing director shall have their permanent residence in the european community instead of at least one half of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the delegates, the managing director, the holder of the procuration and the person entitled to sign in the name of the credit institution shall have their place of residence in the european community ). hotels, restaurants and catering new (less restrictive) language for it's ent in mode 3 on bars, cafes and restaurants, including a commitment on its non-discriminatory nature. travel agencies and tour operators services removal of the ent applied on mode 3 by the cz hairdressing services market access and national treatment commitments by cz, fi, hu and sk in modes 2&3 the following abbreviations are used to indicate the member states: at austria be belgium cy cyprus cz czech republic de germany dk denmark ee estonia el greece es spain fi finland fr france hu hungary ie ireland it italy lt lithuania lu luxembourg lv latvia mt malta nl the netherlands pl poland pt portugal se sweden si slovenia sk slovak republic uk united kingdom joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and colombia, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications, pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. following the submission of each communication, colombia submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/176 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/223 with regard to s/secret/9). the ec and colombia entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). during such negotiations, the ec and colombia have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the withdrawals and modifications contained in document s/secret/8. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and colombia was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. the report on the result of these negotiations, which is attached to this letter, includes (1) the proposed modifications in the notifications referred to above, (2) the agreed compensatory adjustments with regard to the modifications or withdrawals notified in s/secret/8, and (3) the draft consolidated schedule of specific commitments that results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and colombia. this letter and annex i and ii of the report attached to it constitute the agreement between the ec and colombia with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (1). the agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. the agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. report on the result of the negotiations conducted in accordance of article xxi:2(a) of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the gats (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999), the ec submits the following report: 1. on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications (hereafter "the proposed modifications"), pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. the proposed modifications are contained in annex i. 2. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/8, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, eighteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, chinese taipei, colombia, cuba, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, the philippines, switzerland, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 3. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/9, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, fourteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, colombia, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 4. colombia submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/176 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/223 with regard to s/secret/9). the ec and colombia entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. 5. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). 6. during such negotiations, the ec and colombia have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the modifications and withdrawals contained in document s/secret/8. annex i and ii of this report, together with the joint letter to which it is attached, constitute the agreement between the ec and colombia with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (2). this agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. this agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. 7. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and colombia was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. 8. in view of the foregoing, the proposed modifications and the agreed compensatory adjustments are incorporated into the ec's draft gats consolidated schedule, which results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and the colombia. 9. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. (1) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). (2) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). annex i a) modifications notified in document s/secret/8 horizontal commitments market access entry (page 9): in all ec member states services considered as public utilities at a national or local level may be subject to public monopolies or to exclusive rights granted to private operators . this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, austria, poland, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on branches, agencies and representative offices under mode 3 (pages 9 and 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidiaries under mode 3 (page 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, poland, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidies under mode 3 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, austria, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden included only part of the limitations on subsidies on mode 3 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. these limitations are now extended to these member states. national treatment limitation on subsidies under mode 4 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, hungary, malta and slovakia did not include the limitation on subsidies under mode 4 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. this limitation is now extended to these member states. cyprus' market access commitments on mode 4. these commitments are withdrawn. market access entry on mode 4 - intra-company transfers (ict) (page 26). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, latvia, lithuania, hungary, poland and slovakia did not include the limitation that the receiving entity must be effectively providing like services in the territory of the community member state concerned. this limitation is now extended to these member states. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) service sellers (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of poland did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public. this limitation is now extended to this member state. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) establishment of commercial presence (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of lithuania did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public or supplying services. this limitation is now extended to this member state. lithuanias market access commitments on mode 4 business visitors (bv) (page 32). these commitments are partially withdrawn. latvias market access commitment on mode 4 contractual services suppliers (css) (page 33). the schedule of specific commitments of latvia did not include the limitation that the temporary entry and stay within the member state concerned shall be for a period of not more than three months in any 12 months period. this limitation is now extended to this member state. sectoral commitments rental/leasing services without operators - relating to aircraft (page 95). the market access limitation under mode 2 is extended to estonia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia, finland and sweden and the market access limitation under mode 3 is extended to estonia, hungary and austria. services incidental to manufacturing (pages 109 and 110). the commitments included in the schedule of latvia, lithuania and austria are withdrawn. education services (page 156): limitation to only privately funded services . this limitation was not included in the schedule of estonia, latvia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia (only not included with regard to adult education services) and slovakia. this limitation is now extended to these member states. in the case of slovenia, such an extension only refers to adult education services. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (pages 193, 213 and 217). the market access limitations indicating that the establishment of a specialised management company is required to perform the activities of management of unit trusts and investment companies and that only firms having their registered office in the community can act as depositories of the assets of investment funds , both under mode 1 and 3, were not included in the schedule of czech republic as regards mode 3, estonia (not included in mode 1 nor in mode 3), latvia as regards mode 3, lithuania as regards mode 1, hungary as regards mode 3 and slovakia as regards mode 3. these limitations are now extended to these member states. space transport. the commitment included in the schedule of austria is withdrawn. air transport - rental of aircraft with crew (page 246). two market access limitations (one under modes 1 and 2 and another one under mode 3) are introduced for poland. air transport - sales and marketing (pages 247 and 248). the schedule of specific commitments of estonia did not include the national treatment limitation on distribution through crs of air transport services provided by crs parent carrier. air transport - computer reservations system (page 248). the schedule of specific commitments of hungary did not include the national treatment limitation on the obligations of parent or participating carriers in respect of a crs controlled by an air carrier of one or more third countries. services auxiliary to all modes of transport - cargo handling services (page 259). a market access limitation under mode 3 has been introduced for estonia, latvia and lithuania. b) modifications notified in document s/secret/9 horizontal commitments cyprus' and malta's commitments on mode 4 under national treatment (pages 25, 29 and 32 of s/secret/8). these commitments are withdrawn. sectoral commitments computer and related services - a)consultancy services related to the installation of computer hardware (cpc 841) (page 82) - b) software implementation services (cpc 842) (page 83) - c) data processing services (cpc 843) (page 85) - d) data base services (cpc 844) (page 86). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. research and development services - b) r & d services on social sciences and humanities (cpc 852) (pages 89 and 90). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. insurance and insurance-related services - (i) direct insurance (including co-insurance): (a) life and (b) non-life (pages 211 and 212). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (x) (e) transferable securities (page 223). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. hotels, restaurants and catering (cpc 641,642 and 643) (page 232). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. travel agencies and tour operators services (cpc 7471) (pages 233 and 234). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. maritime transport services - excluding cabotage transport - (a) passenger transportation (cpc 7211); (b) freight transportation (cpc 7212) (page 242). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. annex ii compensation by the ec mode 3 horizontal limitation on public utilities footnote on coverage indicating that this limitation does not apply to telecommunication and computer and related services. mode 3 horizontal limitations on investment removal of the national treatment limitation for at in mode 3 on branches of foreign joint stock companies (aktiengesellschaften) and limited liability companies (gesellschaften mit beschr nkter haftung). mode 4 for intra-corporate transferees and business visitors market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in the horizontal section and in the sector-specific section in the sectors where cy and mt have undertaken mode 3 commitments. professional services - engineering services (cpc 8672) market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 2 market access commitments by cy, cz, mt & sk in mode 3 national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 3 removal of the market access limitation for pt in mode 3 professional services - integrated engineering services (cpc 8673): removal of the ent applied on mode 4/css by the uk market access and national treatment commitments by sk in mode 3 professional services - urban planning and landscape architectural services (cpc 8674): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, cz, mt, pl, si & sk in mode 3. market access and national treatment commitments by hu on landscape architectural services in mode 2. computer and related services - addition of a clarificatory footnote. market access and national treatment commitments by hu in modes 1, 2 & 3 for cpc 845 and 849 improved conditions for css/mode 4 by se for computer and related services in the horizontal section and new commitments by se for css/mode 4 for cpc 845 and 849. advertising services (cpc 871): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, mt & pl in mode 1 telecommunication services new and improved commitments by the entire ec as offered in its revised dda offer. a clarification from fi that its three mode 3 horizontal limitations on legal entities under market access, on subsidiaries, branches, agencies and representative offices under national treatment, and on investment under market access do not apply to telecommunications services. a clarificatory footnote indicating that sub-sectors 2.c.h) to 2.c.m) of the services sectoral classification list contained in mtn,gns/w/120 (value-added services) and sub-sectors 2.c.a) to 2.c.g) of that list are included here. sub-sector 2.c.o) of that list is also included here to the extent that it falls under this definition. for the purpose of this schedule, subsector 2c.n of that list (on-line information and/or data processing) is reflected in this schedule of commitments under 1.b (computer and related services). financial services (insurance services): removal of part of the market access limitations for sk in mode 3 financial services (banking) fi: change in mode 3 permanent residency requirements ( at least one of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the managing director shall have their permanent residence in the european community " instead of at least one half of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the delegates, the managing director, the holder of the procuration and the person entitled to sign in the name of the credit institution shall have their place of residence in the european community ). hotels, restaurants and catering new (less restrictive) language for it's ent in mode 3 on bars, cafes and restaurants, including a commitment on its non-discriminatory nature. travel agencies and tour operators services removal of the ent applied on mode 3 by the cz hairdressing services market access and national treatment commitments by cz, fi, hu and sk in modes 2 & 3 the following abbreviations are used to indicate the member states: at austria be belgium cy cyprus cz czech republic de germany dk denmark ee estonia el greece es spain fi finland fr france hu hungary ie ireland it italy lt lithuania lu luxembourg lv latvia mt malta nl the netherlands pl poland pt portugal se sweden si slovenia sk slovak republic uk united kingdom joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and cuba, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications, pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. following the submission of the first communication, cuba submitted a claim of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/174) with regard to s/secret/8. no claim of interest was submitted with regard to s/secret/9. the ec and cuba entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). during such negotiations, the ec and cuba have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the withdrawals and modifications contained in document s/secret/8. the report on the result of these negotiations, which is attached to this letter, includes (1) the proposed modifications in the notifications referred to above, (2) the agreed compensatory adjustments with regard to the modifications or withdrawals notified in s/secret/8, and (3) the draft consolidated schedule of specific commitments that results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and cuba. this letter and annex i and ii of the report attached to it constitute the agreement between the ec and cuba with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (1). the agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. the agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. report on the result of the negotiations conducted in accordance of article xxi:2(a) of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the gats (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999), the ec submits the following report: 1. on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications (hereafter "the proposed modifications"), pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. the proposed modifications are contained in annex i. 2. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/8, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, eighteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, chinese taipei, colombia, cuba, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, the philippines, switzerland, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 3. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/9, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, fourteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, colombia, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 4. cuba submitted a claim of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/174) with regard to s/secret/8. no claim of interest was submitted with regard to s/secret/9. the ec and cuba entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8. 5. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). 6. during such negotiations, the ec and cuba have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the modifications and withdrawals contained in document s/secret/8. annex i and ii of this report, together with the joint letter to which it is attached, constitute the agreement between the ec and cuba with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (2). this agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. this agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. 7. in view of the foregoing, the proposed modifications and the agreed compensatory adjustments are incorporated into the ec's draft gats consolidated schedule, which results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and cuba. 8. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. (1) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). (2) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). annex i a) modifications notified in document s/secret/8 horizontal commitments market access entry (page 9): in all ec member states services considered as public utilities at a national or local level may be subject to public monopolies or to exclusive rights granted to private operators . this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, austria, poland, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on branches, agencies and representative offices under mode 3 (pages 9 and 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidiaries under mode 3 (page 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, poland, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidies under mode 3 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, austria, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden included only part of the limitations on subsidies on mode 3 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. these limitations are now extended to these member states. national treatment limitation on subsidies under mode 4 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, hungary, malta and slovakia did not include the limitation on subsidies under mode 4 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. this limitation is now extended to these member states. cyprus' market access commitments on mode 4. these commitments are withdrawn. market access entry on mode 4 - intra-company transfers (ict) (page 26). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, latvia, lithuania, hungary, poland and slovakia did not include the limitation that the receiving entity must be effectively providing like services in the territory of the community member state concerned. this limitation is now extended to these member states. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) service sellers (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of poland did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public. this limitation is now extended to this member state. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) establishment of commercial presence (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of lithuania did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public or supplying services. this limitation is now extended to this member state. lithuanias market access commitments on mode 4 business visitors (bv) (page 32). these commitments are partially withdrawn. latvias market access commitment on mode 4 contractual services suppliers (css) (page 33). the schedule of specific commitments of latvia did not include the limitation that the temporary entry and stay within the member state concerned shall be for a period of not more than three months in any 12 months period. this limitation is now extended to this member state. sectoral commitments rental/leasing services without operators - relating to aircraft (page 95). the market access limitation under mode 2 is extended to estonia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia, finland and sweden and the market access limitation under mode 3 is extended to estonia, hungary and austria. services incidental to manufacturing (pages 109 and 110). the commitments included in the schedule of latvia, lithuania and austria are withdrawn. education services (page 156): limitation to only privately funded services . this limitation was not included in the schedule of estonia, latvia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia (only not included with regard to adult education services) and slovakia. this limitation is now extended to these member states. in the case of slovenia, such an extension only refers to adult education services. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (pages 193, 213 and 217). the market access limitations indicating that the establishment of a specialised management company is required to perform the activities of management of unit trusts and investment companies and that only firms having their registered office in the community can act as depositories of the assets of investment funds , both under mode 1 and 3, were not included in the schedule of czech republic as regards mode 3, estonia (not included in mode 1 nor in mode 3), latvia as regards mode 3, lithuania as regards mode 1, hungary as regards mode 3 and slovakia as regards mode 3. these limitations are now extended to these member states. space transport. the commitment included in the schedule of austria is withdrawn. air transport - rental of aircraft with crew (page 246). two market access limitations (one under modes 1 and 2 and another one under mode 3) are introduced for poland. air transport - sales and marketing (pages 247 and 248). the schedule of specific commitments of estonia did not include the national treatment limitation on distribution through crs of air transport services provided by crs parent carrier. air transport - computer reservations system (page 248). the schedule of specific commitments of hungary did not include the national treatment limitation on the obligations of parent or participating carriers in respect of a crs controlled by an air carrier of one or more third countries. services auxiliary to all modes of transport - cargo handling services (page 259). a market access limitation under mode 3 has been introduced for estonia, latvia and lithuania. b) modifications notified in document s/secret/9 horizontal commitments cyprus' and malta's commitments on mode 4 under national treatment (pages 25, 29 and 32 of s/secret/8). these commitments are withdrawn. sectoral commitments computer and related services - a)consultancy services related to the installation of computer hardware (cpc 841) (page 82) - b) software implementation services (cpc 842) (page 83) - c) data processing services (cpc 843) (page 85) - d) data base services (cpc 844) (page 86). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. research and development services - b) r & d services on social sciences and humanities (cpc 852) (pages 89 and 90). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. insurance and insurance-related services - (i) direct insurance (including co-insurance): (a) life and (b) non-life (pages 211 and 212). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (x) (e) transferable securities (page 223). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. hotels, restaurants and catering (cpc 641,642 and 643) (page 232). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. travel agencies and tour operators services (cpc 7471) (pages 233 and 234). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. maritime transport services - excluding cabotage transport - (a) passenger transportation (cpc 7211); (b) freight transportation (cpc 7212) (page 242). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. annex ii compensation by the ec mode 3 horizontal limitation on public utilities footnote on coverage indicating that this limitation does not apply to telecommunication and computer and related services. mode 3 horizontal limitations on investment removal of the national treatment limitation for at in mode 3 on branches of foreign joint stock companies (aktiengesellschaften) and limited liability companies (gesellschaften mit beschr nkter haftung). mode 4 for intra-corporate transferees and business visitors market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in the horizontal section and in the sector-specific section in the sectors where cy and mt have undertaken mode 3 commitments. professional services - engineering services (cpc 8672) market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 2 market access commitments by cy, cz, mt & sk in mode 3 national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 3 removal of the market access limitation for pt in mode 3 professional services - integrated engineering services (cpc 8673): removal of the ent applied on mode 4/css by the uk market access and national treatment commitments by sk in mode 3 professional services - urban planning and landscape architectural services (cpc 8674): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, cz, mt, pl, si & sk in mode 3. market access and national treatment commitments by hu on landscape architectural services in mode 2. computer and related services - addition of a clarificatory footnote. market access and national treatment commitments by hu in modes 1, 2 & 3 for cpc 845 and 849 improved conditions for css/mode 4 by se for computer and related services in the horizontal section and new commitments by se for css/mode 4 for cpc 845 and 849. advertising services (cpc 871): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, mt & pl in mode 1 telecommunication services new and improved commitments by the entire ec as offered in its revised dda offer. a clarification from fi that its three mode 3 horizontal limitations on legal entities under market access, on subsidiaries, branches, agencies and representative offices under national treatment, and on investment under market access do not apply to telecommunications services. a clarificatory footnote indicating that sub-sectors 2.c.h) to 2.c.m) of the services sectoral classification list contained in mtn,gns/w/120 (value-added services) and sub-sectors 2.c.a) to 2.c.g) of that list are included here. sub-sector 2.c.o) of that list is also included here to the extent that it falls under this definition. for the purpose of this schedule, subsector 2c.n of that list (on-line information and/or data processing) is reflected in this schedule of commitments under 1.b (computer and related services). financial services (insurance services): removal of part of the market access limitations for sk in mode 3 financial services (banking) fi: change in mode 3 permanent residency requirements ( at least one of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the managing director shall have their permanent residence in the european community " instead of at least one half of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the delegates, the managing director, the holder of the procuration and the person entitled to sign in the name of the credit institution shall have their place of residence in the european community "). hotels, restaurants and catering new (less restrictive) language for it's ent in mode 3 on bars, cafes and restaurants, including a commitment on its non-discriminatory nature. travel agencies and tour operators services removal of the ent applied on mode 3 by the cz hairdressing services market access and national treatment commitments by cz, fi, hu and sk in modes 2 & 3 the following abbreviations are used to indicate the member states: at austria be belgium cy cyprus cz czech republic de germany dk denmark ee estonia el greece es spain fi finland fr france hu hungary ie ireland it italy lt lithuania lu luxembourg lv latvia mt malta nl the netherlands pl poland pt portugal se sweden si slovenia sk slovak republic uk united kingdom joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and ecuador, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications, pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. following the submission of each communication, ecuador submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/172 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/229 with regard to s/secret/9). the ec and ecuador entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). during such negotiations, the ec and ecuador have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the withdrawals and modifications contained in document s/secret/8. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and ecuador was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. the report on the result of these negotiations, which is attached to this letter, includes (1) the proposed modifications in the notifications referred to above, (2) the agreed compensatory adjustments with regard to the modifications or withdrawals notified in s/secret/8, and (3) the draft consolidated schedule of specific commitments that results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and ecuador. this letter and annex i and ii of the report attached to it constitute the agreement between the ec and ecuador with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (1). the agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. the agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. report on the result of the negotiations conducted in accordance of article xxi:2(a) of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the gats (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999), the ec submits the following report: 1. on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications (hereafter "the proposed modifications"), pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. the proposed modifications are contained in annex i. 2. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/8, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, eighteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, chinese taipei, colombia, cuba, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, the philippines, switzerland, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 3. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/9, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, fourteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, colombia, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 4. ecuador submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/172 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/229 with regard to s/secret/9). the ec and ecuador entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. 5. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). 6. during such negotiations, the ec and ecuador have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the modifications and withdrawals contained in document s/secret/8. annex i and ii of this report, together with the joint letter to which it is attached, constitute the agreement between the ec and ecuador with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (2). this agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. this agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. 7. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and ecuador was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. 8. in view of the foregoing, the proposed modifications and the agreed compensatory adjustments are incorporated into the ec's draft gats consolidated schedule, which results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and the ecuador. 9. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. (1) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). (2) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). annex i a) modifications notified in document s/secret/8 horizontal commitments market access entry (page 9): in all ec member states services considered as public utilities at a national or local level may be subject to public monopolies or to exclusive rights granted to private operators . this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, austria, poland, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on branches, agencies and representative offices under mode 3 (pages 9 and 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidiaries under mode 3 (page 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, poland, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidies under mode 3 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, austria, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden included only part of the limitations on subsidies on mode 3 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. these limitations are now extended to these member states. national treatment limitation on subsidies under mode 4 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, hungary, malta and slovakia did not include the limitation on subsidies under mode 4 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. this limitation is now extended to these member states. cyprus' market access commitments on mode 4. these commitments are withdrawn. market access entry on mode 4 - intra-company transfers (ict) (page 26). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, latvia, lithuania, hungary, poland and slovakia did not include the limitation that the receiving entity must be effectively providing like services in the territory of the community member state concerned. this limitation is now extended to these member states. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) service sellers (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of poland did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public. this limitation is now extended to this member state. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) establishment of commercial presence (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of lithuania did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public or supplying services. this limitation is now extended to this member state. lithuanias market access commitments on mode 4 business visitors (bv) (page 32). these commitments are partially withdrawn. latvias market access commitment on mode 4 contractual services suppliers (css) (page 33). the schedule of specific commitments of latvia did not include the limitation that the temporary entry and stay within the member state concerned shall be for a period of not more than three months in any 12 months period. this limitation is now extended to this member state. sectoral commitments rental/leasing services without operators - relating to aircraft (page 95). the market access limitation under mode 2 is extended to estonia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia, finland and sweden and the market access limitation under mode 3 is extended to estonia, hungary and austria. services incidental to manufacturing (pages 109 and 110). the commitments included in the schedule of latvia, lithuania and austria are withdrawn. education services (page 156): limitation to only privately funded services . this limitation was not included in the schedule of estonia, latvia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia (only not included with regard to adult education services) and slovakia. this limitation is now extended to these member states. in the case of slovenia, such an extension only refers to adult education services. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (pages 193, 213 and 217). the market access limitations indicating that the establishment of a specialised management company is required to perform the activities of management of unit trusts and investment companies and that only firms having their registered office in the community can act as depositories of the assets of investment funds , both under mode 1 and 3, were not included in the schedule of czech republic as regards mode 3, estonia (not included in mode 1 nor in mode 3), latvia as regards mode 3, lithuania as regards mode 1, hungary as regards mode 3 and slovakia as regards mode 3. these limitations are now extended to these member states. space transport. the commitment included in the schedule of austria is withdrawn. air transport - rental of aircraft with crew (page 246). two market access limitations (one under modes 1 and 2 and another one under mode 3) are introduced for poland. air transport - sales and marketing (pages 247 and 248). the schedule of specific commitments of estonia did not include the national treatment limitation on distribution through crs of air transport services provided by crs parent carrier. air transport - computer reservations system (page 248). the schedule of specific commitments of hungary did not include the national treatment limitation on the obligations of parent or participating carriers in respect of a crs controlled by an air carrier of one or more third countries. services auxiliary to all modes of transport - cargo handling services (page 259). a market access limitation under mode 3 has been introduced for estonia, latvia and lithuania. b) modifications notified in document s/secret/9 horizontal commitments cyprus' and malta's commitments on mode 4 under national treatment (pages 25, 29 and 32 of s/secret/8). these commitments are withdrawn. sectoral commitments computer and related services - a)consultancy services related to the installation of computer hardware (cpc 841) (page 82) - b) software implementation services (cpc 842) (page 83) - c) data processing services (cpc 843) (page 85) - d) data base services (cpc 844) (page 86). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. research and development services - b) r & d services on social sciences and humanities (cpc 852) (pages 89 and 90). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. insurance and insurance-related services - (i) direct insurance (including co-insurance): (a) life and (b) non-life (pages 211 and 212). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (x) (e) transferable securities (page 223). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. hotels, restaurants and catering (cpc 641,642 and 643) (page 232). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. travel agencies and tour operators services (cpc 7471) (pages 233 and 234). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. maritime transport services - excluding cabotage transport - (a) passenger transportation (cpc 7211); (b) freight transportation (cpc 7212) (page 242). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. annex ii compensation by the ec mode 3 horizontal limitation on public utilities footnote on coverage indicating that this limitation does not apply to telecommunication and computer and related services. mode 3 horizontal limitations on investment removal of the national treatment limitation for at in mode 3 on branches of foreign joint stock companies (aktiengesellschaften) and limited liability companies (gesellschaften mit beschr nkter haftung). mode 4 for intra-corporate transferees and business visitors market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in the horizontal section and in the sector-specific section in the sectors where cy and mt have undertaken mode 3 commitments. professional services - engineering services (cpc 8672) market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 2 market access commitments by cy, cz, mt & sk in mode 3 national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 3 removal of the market access limitation for pt in mode 3 professional services - integrated engineering services (cpc 8673): removal of the ent applied on mode 4/css by the uk market access and national treatment commitments by sk in mode 3 professional services - urban planning and landscape architectural services (cpc 8674): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, cz, mt, pl, si & sk in mode 3. market access and national treatment commitments by hu on landscape architectural services in mode 2. computer and related services - addition of a clarificatory footnote. market access and national treatment commitments by hu in modes 1, 2 & 3 for cpc 845 and 849 improved conditions for css/mode 4 by se for computer and related services in the horizontal section and new commitments by se for css/mode 4 for cpc 845 and 849. advertising services (cpc 871): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, mt & pl in mode 1 telecommunication services new and improved commitments by the entire ec as offered in its revised dda offer. a clarification from fi that its three mode 3 horizontal limitations on legal entities under market access, on subsidiaries, branches, agencies and representative offices under national treatment, and on investment under market access do not apply to telecommunications services. a clarificatory footnote indicating that sub-sectors 2.c.h) to 2.c.m) of the services sectoral classification list contained in mtn,gns/w/120 (value-added services) and sub-sectors 2.c.a) to 2.c.g) of that list are included here. sub-sector 2.c.o) of that list is also included here to the extent that it falls under this definition. for the purpose of this schedule, subsector 2c.n of that list (on-line information and/or data processing) is reflected in this schedule of commitments under 1.b (computer and related services). financial services (insurance services): removal of part of the market access limitations for sk in mode 3 financial services (banking) fi: change in mode 3 permanent residency requirements ( at least one of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the managing director shall have their permanent residence in the european community instead of at least one half of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the delegates, the managing director, the holder of the procuration and the person entitled to sign in the name of the credit institution shall have their place of residence in the european community ). hotels, restaurants and catering new (less restrictive) language for it's ent in mode 3 on bars, cafes and restaurants, including a commitment on its non-discriminatory nature. travel agencies and tour operators services removal of the ent applied on mode 3 by the cz hairdressing services market access and national treatment commitments by cz, fi, hu and sk in modes 2 & 3 the following abbreviations are used to indicate the member states: at austria be belgium cy cyprus cz czech republic de germany dk denmark ee estonia el greece es spain fi finland fr france hu hungary ie ireland it italy lt lithuania lu luxembourg lv latvia mt malta nl the netherlands pl poland pt portugal se sweden si slovenia sk slovak republic uk united kingdom joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and hong kong, china, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications, pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. following the submission of each communication, hong kong, china submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/170 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/219 with regard to s/secret/9). the ec and hong kong, china entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). during such negotiations, the ec and hong kong, china have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the withdrawals and modifications contained in document s/secret/8. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and hong kong, china was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. the report on the result of these negotiations, which is attached to this letter, includes (1) the proposed modifications in the notifications referred to above, (2) the agreed compensatory adjustments with regard to the modifications or withdrawals notified in s/secret/8, and (3) the draft consolidated schedule of specific commitments that results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and hong kong, china. this letter and annex i and ii of the report attached to it constitute the agreement between the ec and hong kong, china with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (1). the agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. the agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. report on the result of the negotiations conducted in accordance of article xxi:2(a) of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the gats (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999), the ec submits the following report: 1. on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications (hereafter "the proposed modifications"), pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. the proposed modifications are contained in annex i. 2. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/8, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, eighteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, chinese taipei, colombia, cuba, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, the philippines, switzerland, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 3. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/9, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, fourteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, colombia, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 4. hong kong, china submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/170 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/219 with regard to s/secret/9). the ec and hong kong, china entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. 5. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). 6. during such negotiations, the ec and hong kong, china have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the modifications and withdrawals contained in document s/secret/8. annex i and ii of this report, together with the joint letter to which it is attached, constitute the agreement between the ec and hong kong, china with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (2). this agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. this agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. 7. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and hong kong, china was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. 8. in view of the foregoing, the proposed modifications and the agreed compensatory adjustments are incorporated into the ec's draft gats consolidated schedule, which results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and the hong kong, china. 9. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. (1) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). (2) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). annex i a) modifications notified in document s/secret/8 horizontal commitments market access entry (page 9): in all ec member states services considered as public utilities at a national or local level may be subject to public monopolies or to exclusive rights granted to private operators . this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, austria, poland, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on branches, agencies and representative offices under mode 3 (pages 9 and 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidiaries under mode 3 (page 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, poland, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidies under mode 3 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, austria, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden included only part of the limitations on subsidies on mode 3 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. these limitations are now extended to these member states. national treatment limitation on subsidies under mode 4 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, hungary, malta and slovakia did not include the limitation on subsidies under mode 4 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. this limitation is now extended to these member states. cyprus' market access commitments on mode 4. these commitments are withdrawn. market access entry on mode 4 - intra-company transfers (ict) (page 26). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, latvia, lithuania, hungary, poland and slovakia did not include the limitation that the receiving entity must be effectively providing like services in the territory of the community member state concerned. this limitation is now extended to these member states. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) service sellers (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of poland did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public. this limitation is now extended to this member state. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) establishment of commercial presence (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of lithuania did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public or supplying services. this limitation is now extended to this member state. lithuanias market access commitments on mode 4 business visitors (bv) (page 32). these commitments are partially withdrawn. latvias market access commitment on mode 4 contractual services suppliers (css) (page 33). the schedule of specific commitments of latvia did not include the limitation that the temporary entry and stay within the member state concerned shall be for a period of not more than three months in any 12 months period. this limitation is now extended to this member state. sectoral commitments rental/leasing services without operators - relating to aircraft (page 95). the market access limitation under mode 2 is extended to estonia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia, finland and sweden and the market access limitation under mode 3 is extended to estonia, hungary and austria. services incidental to manufacturing (pages 109 and 110). the commitments included in the schedule of latvia, lithuania and austria are withdrawn. education services (page 156): limitation to only privately funded services . this limitation was not included in the schedule of estonia, latvia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia (only not included with regard to adult education services) and slovakia. this limitation is now extended to these member states. in the case of slovenia, such an extension only refers to adult education services. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (pages 193, 213 and 217). the market access limitations indicating that the establishment of a specialised management company is required to perform the activities of management of unit trusts and investment companies and that only firms having their registered office in the community can act as depositories of the assets of investment funds , both under mode 1 and 3, were not included in the schedule of czech republic as regards mode 3, estonia (not included in mode 1 nor in mode 3), latvia as regards mode 3, lithuania as regards mode 1, hungary as regards mode 3 and slovakia as regards mode 3. these limitations are now extended to these member states. space transport. the commitment included in the schedule of austria is withdrawn. air transport - rental of aircraft with crew (page 246). two market access limitations (one under modes 1 and 2 and another one under mode 3) are introduced for poland. air transport - sales and marketing (pages 247 and 248). the schedule of specific commitments of estonia did not include the national treatment limitation on distribution through crs of air transport services provided by crs parent carrier. air transport - computer reservations system (page 248). the schedule of specific commitments of hungary did not include the national treatment limitation on the obligations of parent or participating carriers in respect of a crs controlled by an air carrier of one or more third countries. services auxiliary to all modes of transport - cargo handling services (page 259). a market access limitation under mode 3 has been introduced for estonia, latvia and lithuania. b) modifications notified in document s/secret/9 horizontal commitments cyprus' and malta's commitments on mode 4 under national treatment (pages 25, 29 and 32 of s/secret/8). these commitments are withdrawn. sectoral commitments computer and related services - a)consultancy services related to the installation of computer hardware (cpc 841) (page 82) - b) software implementation services (cpc 842) (page 83) - c) data processing services (cpc 843) (page 85) - d) data base services (cpc 844) (page 86). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. research and development services - b) r & d services on social sciences and humanities (cpc 852) (pages 89 and 90). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. insurance and insurance-related services - (i) direct insurance (including co-insurance): (a) life and (b) non-life (pages 211 and 212). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (x) (e) transferable securities (page 223). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. hotels, restaurants and catering (cpc 641,642 and 643) (page 232). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. travel agencies and tour operators services (cpc 7471) (pages 233 and 234). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. maritime transport services - excluding cabotage transport - (a) passenger transportation (cpc 7211); (b) freight transportation (cpc 7212) (page 242). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. annex ii compensation by the ec mode 3 horizontal limitation on public utilities footnote on coverage indicating that this limitation does not apply to telecommunication and computer and related services. mode 3 horizontal limitations on investment removal of the national treatment limitation for at in mode 3 on branches of foreign joint stock companies (aktiengesellschaften) and limited liability companies (gesellschaften mit beschr nkter haftung). mode 4 for intra-corporate transferees and business visitors market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in the horizontal section and in the sector-specific section in the sectors where cy and mt have undertaken mode 3 commitments. professional services - engineering services (cpc 8672) market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 2 market access commitments by cy, cz, mt & sk in mode 3 national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 3 removal of the market access limitation for pt in mode 3 professional services - integrated engineering services (cpc 8673): removal of the ent applied on mode 4/css by the uk market access and national treatment commitments by sk in mode 3 professional services - urban planning and landscape architectural services (cpc 8674): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, cz, mt, pl, si & sk in mode 3. market access and national treatment commitments by hu on landscape architectural services in mode 2. computer and related services - addition of a clarificatory footnote. market access and national treatment commitments by hu in modes 1, 2 & 3 for cpc 845 and 849 improved conditions for css/mode 4 by se for computer and related services in the horizontal section and new commitments by se for css/mode 4 for cpc 845 and 849. advertising services (cpc 871): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, mt & pl in mode 1 telecommunication services new and improved commitments by the entire ec as offered in its revised dda offer. a clarification from fi that its three mode 3 horizontal limitations on legal entities under market access, on subsidiaries, branches, agencies and representative offices under national treatment, and on investment under market access do not apply to telecommunications services. a clarificatory footnote indicating that sub-sectors 2.c.h) to 2.c.m) of the services sectoral classification list contained in mtn,gns/w/120 (value-added services) and sub-sectors 2.c.a) to 2.c.g) of that list are included here. sub-sector 2.c.o) of that list is also included here to the extent that it falls under this definition. for the purpose of this schedule, subsector 2c.n of that list (on-line information and/or data processing) is reflected in this schedule of commitments under 1.b (computer and related services). financial services (insurance services): removal of part of the market access limitations for sk in mode 3 financial services (banking) fi: change in mode 3 permanent residency requirements ( at least one of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the managing director shall have their permanent residence in the european community " instead of at least one half of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the delegates, the managing director, the holder of the procuration and the person entitled to sign in the name of the credit institution shall have their place of residence in the european community ). hotels, restaurants and catering new (less restrictive) language for it's ent in mode 3 on bars, cafes and restaurants, including a commitment on its non-discriminatory nature. travel agencies and tour operators services removal of the ent applied on mode 3 by the cz hairdressing services market access and national treatment commitments by cz, fi, hu and sk in modes 2 & 3 the following abbreviations are used to indicate the member states: at austria be belgium cy cyprus cz czech republic de germany dk denmark ee estonia el greece es spain fi finland fr france hu hungary ie ireland it italy lt lithuania lu luxembourg lv latvia mt malta nl the netherlands pl poland pt portugal se sweden si slovenia sk slovak republic uk united kingdom joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and india, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications, pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. following the submission of each communication, india submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/163 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/221 with regard to s/secret/9). the ec and india entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). during such negotiations, the ec and india have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the withdrawals and modifications contained in document s/secret/8. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and india was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. the report on the result of these negotiations, which is attached to this letter, includes (1) the proposed modifications in the notifications referred to above, (2) the agreed compensatory adjustments with regard to the modifications or withdrawals notified in s/secret/8, and (3) the draft consolidated schedule of specific commitments that results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and india. this letter and annex i and ii of the report attached to it constitute the agreement between the ec and india with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (1). the agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. the agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. report on the result of the negotiations conducted in accordance of article xxi:2(a) of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the gats (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999), the ec submits the following report: 1. on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications (hereafter "the proposed modifications"), pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. the proposed modifications are contained in annex i. 2. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/8, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, eighteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, chinese taipei, colombia, cuba, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, the philippines, switzerland, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 3. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/9, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, fourteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, colombia, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 4. india submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/163 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/221 with regard to s/secret/9). the ec and india entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. 5. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). 6. during such negotiations, the ec and india have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the modifications and withdrawals contained in document s/secret/8. annex i and ii of this report, together with the joint letter to which it is attached, constitute the agreement between the ec and india with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (2). this agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. this agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. 7. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and india was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. 8. in view of the foregoing, the proposed modifications and the agreed compensatory adjustments are incorporated into the ec's draft gats consolidated schedule, which results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and india. 9. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. (1) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). (2) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). annex i a) modifications notified in document s/secret/8 horizontal commitments market access entry (page 9): in all ec member states services considered as public utilities at a national or local level may be subject to public monopolies or to exclusive rights granted to private operators . this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, austria, poland, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on branches, agencies and representative offices under mode 3 (pages 9 and 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidiaries under mode 3 (page 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, poland, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidies under mode 3 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, austria, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden included only part of the limitations on subsidies on mode 3 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. these limitations are now extended to these member states. national treatment limitation on subsidies under mode 4 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, hungary, malta and slovakia did not include the limitation on subsidies under mode 4 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. this limitation is now extended to these member states. cyprus' market access commitments on mode 4. these commitments are withdrawn. market access entry on mode 4 - intra-company transfers (ict) (page 26). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, latvia, lithuania, hungary, poland and slovakia did not include the limitation that the receiving entity must be effectively providing like services in the territory of the community member state concerned. this limitation is now extended to these member states. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) service sellers (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of poland did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public. this limitation is now extended to this member state. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) establishment of commercial presence (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of lithuania did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public or supplying services. this limitation is now extended to this member state. lithuanias market access commitments on mode 4 business visitors (bv) (page 32). these commitments are partially withdrawn. latvias market access commitment on mode 4 contractual services suppliers (css) (page 33). the schedule of specific commitments of latvia did not include the limitation that the temporary entry and stay within the member state concerned shall be for a period of not more than three months in any 12 months period. this limitation is now extended to this member state. sectoral commitments rental/leasing services without operators - relating to aircraft (page 95). the market access limitation under mode 2 is extended to estonia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia, finland and sweden and the market access limitation under mode 3 is extended to estonia, hungary and austria. services incidental to manufacturing (pages 109 and 110). the commitments included in the schedule of latvia, lithuania and austria are withdrawn. education services (page 156): limitation to only privately funded services . this limitation was not included in the schedule of estonia, latvia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia (only not included with regard to adult education services) and slovakia. this limitation is now extended to these member states. in the case of slovenia, such an extension only refers to adult education services. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (pages 193, 213 and 217). the market access limitations indicating that the establishment of a specialised management company is required to perform the activities of management of unit trusts and investment companies and that only firms having their registered office in the community can act as depositories of the assets of investment funds , both under mode 1 and 3, were not included in the schedule of czech republic as regards mode 3, estonia (not included in mode 1 nor in mode 3), latvia as regards mode 3, lithuania as regards mode 1, hungary as regards mode 3 and slovakia as regards mode 3. these limitations are now extended to these member states. space transport. the commitment included in the schedule of austria is withdrawn. air transport - rental of aircraft with crew (page 246). two market access limitations (one under modes 1 and 2 and another one under mode 3) are introduced for poland. air transport - sales and marketing (pages 247 and 248). the schedule of specific commitments of estonia did not include the national treatment limitation on distribution through crs of air transport services provided by crs parent carrier. air transport - computer reservations system (page 248). the schedule of specific commitments of hungary did not include the national treatment limitation on the obligations of parent or participating carriers in respect of a crs controlled by an air carrier of one or more third countries. services auxiliary to all modes of transport - cargo handling services (page 259). a market access limitation under mode 3 has been introduced for estonia, latvia and lithuania. b) modifications notified in document s/secret/9 horizontal commitments cyprus' and malta's commitments on mode 4 under national treatment (pages 25, 29 and 32 of s/secret/8). these commitments are withdrawn. sectoral commitments computer and related services - a)consultancy services related to the installation of computer hardware (cpc 841) (page 82) - b) software implementation services (cpc 842) (page 83) - c) data processing services (cpc 843) (page 85) - d) data base services (cpc 844) (page 86). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. research and development services - b) r & d services on social sciences and humanities (cpc 852) (pages 89 and 90). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. insurance and insurance-related services - (i) direct insurance (including co-insurance): (a) life and (b) non-life (pages 211 and 212). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (x) (e) transferable securities (page 223). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. hotels, restaurants and catering (cpc 641,642 and 643) (page 232). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. travel agencies and tour operators services (cpc 7471) (pages 233 and 234). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. maritime transport services - excluding cabotage transport - (a) passenger transportation (cpc 7211); (b) freight transportation (cpc 7212) (page 242). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. annex ii compensation by the ec mode 3 horizontal limitation on public utilities footnote on coverage indicating that this limitation does not apply to telecommunication and computer and related services. mode 3 horizontal limitations on investment removal of the national treatment limitation for at in mode 3 on branches of foreign joint stock companies (aktiengesellschaften) and limited liability companies (gesellschaften mit beschr nkter haftung). mode 4 for intra-corporate transferees and business visitors market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in the horizontal section and in the sector-specific section in the sectors where cy and mt have undertaken mode 3 commitments. professional services - engineering services (cpc 8672) market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 2 market access commitments by cy, cz, mt & sk in mode 3 national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 3 removal of the market access limitation for pt in mode 3 professional services - integrated engineering services (cpc 8673): removal of the ent applied on mode 4/css by the uk market access and national treatment commitments by sk in mode 3 professional services - urban planning and landscape architectural services (cpc 8674): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, cz, mt, pl, si & sk in mode 3. market access and national treatment commitments by hu on landscape architectural services in mode 2. computer and related services - addition of a clarificatory footnote. market access and national treatment commitments by hu in modes 1, 2 & 3 for cpc 845 and 849 improved conditions for css/mode 4 by se for computer and related services in the horizontal section and new commitments by se for css/mode 4 for cpc 845 and 849. advertising services (cpc 871): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, mt & pl in mode 1 telecommunication services new and improved commitments by the entire ec as offered in its revised dda offer. a clarification from fi that its three mode 3 horizontal limitations on legal entities under market access, on subsidiaries, branches, agencies and representative offices under national treatment, and on investment under market access do not apply to telecommunications services. a clarificatory footnote indicating that sub-sectors 2.c.h) to 2.c.m) of the services sectoral classification list contained in mtn,gns/w/120 (value-added services) and sub-sectors 2.c.a) to 2.c.g) of that list are included here. sub-sector 2.c.o) of that list is also included here to the extent that it falls under this definition. for the purpose of this schedule, subsector 2c.n of that list (on-line information and/or data processing) is reflected in this schedule of commitments under 1.b (computer and related services). financial services (insurance services): removal of part of the market access limitations for sk in mode 3 financial services (banking) fi: change in mode 3 permanent residency requirements ( at least one of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the managing director shall have their permanent residence in the european community instead of at least one half of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the delegates, the managing director, the holder of the procuration and the person entitled to sign in the name of the credit institution shall have their place of residence in the european community ). hotels, restaurants and catering new (less restrictive) language for it's ent in mode 3 on bars, cafes and restaurants, including a commitment on its non-discriminatory nature. travel agencies and tour operators services removal of the ent applied on mode 3 by the cz hairdressing services market access and national treatment commitments by cz, fi, hu and sk in modes 2 & 3 the following abbreviations are used to indicate the member states: at austria be belgium cy cyprus cz czech republic de germany dk denmark ee estonia el greece es spain fi finland fr france hu hungary ie ireland it italy lt lithuania lu luxembourg lv latvia mt malta nl the netherlands pl poland pt portugal se sweden si slovenia sk slovak republic uk united kingdom joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and japan, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications, pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. following the submission of each communication, japan submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/168 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/218 with regard to s/secret/9).the ec and japan entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). during such negotiations, the ec and japan have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the withdrawals and modifications contained in document s/secret/8. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and japan was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. the report on the result of these negotiations, which is attached to this letter, includes (1) the proposed modifications in the notifications referred to above, (2) the agreed compensatory adjustments with regard to the modifications or withdrawals notified in s/secret/8, and (3) the draft consolidated schedule of specific commitments that results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and japan. this letter and annex i and ii of the report attached to it constitute the agreement between the ec and japan with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (1). the agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. the agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. report on the result of the negotiations conducted in accordance of article xxi:2(a) of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the gats (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999), the ec submits the following report: 1. on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications (hereafter "the proposed modifications"), pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. the proposed modifications are contained in annex i. 2. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/8, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, eighteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, chinese taipei, colombia, cuba, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, the philippines, switzerland, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 3. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/9, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, fourteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, colombia, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 4. japan submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/168 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/218 with regard to s/secret/9).the ec and japan entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. 5. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). 6. during such negotiations, the ec and japan have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the modifications and withdrawals contained in document s/secret/8. annex i and ii of this report, together with the joint letter to which it is attached, constitute the agreement between the ec and japan with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (2). this agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. this agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. 7. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and japan was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. 8. in view of the foregoing, the proposed modifications and the agreed compensatory adjustments are incorporated into the ec's draft gats consolidated schedule, which results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and the japan. 9. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. (1) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). (2) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). annex i a) modifications notified in document s/secret/8 horizontal commitments market access entry (page 9): in all ec member states services considered as public utilities at a national or local level may be subject to public monopolies or to exclusive rights granted to private operators . this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, austria, poland, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on branches, agencies and representative offices under mode 3 (pages 9 and 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidiaries under mode 3 (page 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, poland, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidies under mode 3 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, austria, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden included only part of the limitations on subsidies on mode 3 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. these limitations are now extended to these member states. national treatment limitation on subsidies under mode 4 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, hungary, malta and slovakia did not include the limitation on subsidies under mode 4 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. this limitation is now extended to these member states. cyprus' market access commitments on mode 4. these commitments are withdrawn. market access entry on mode 4 - intra-company transfers (ict) (page 26). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, latvia, lithuania, hungary, poland and slovakia did not include the limitation that the receiving entity must be effectively providing like services in the territory of the community member state concerned. this limitation is now extended to these member states. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) service sellers (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of poland did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public. this limitation is now extended to this member state. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) establishment of commercial presence (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of lithuania did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public or supplying services. this limitation is now extended to this member state. lithuanias market access commitments on mode 4 business visitors (bv) (page 32). these commitments are partially withdrawn. latvias market access commitment on mode 4 contractual services suppliers (css) (page 33). the schedule of specific commitments of latvia did not include the limitation that the temporary entry and stay within the member state concerned shall be for a period of not more than three months in any 12 months period. this limitation is now extended to this member state. sectoral commitments rental/leasing services without operators - relating to aircraft (page 95). the market access limitation under mode 2 is extended to estonia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia, finland and sweden and the market access limitation under mode 3 is extended to estonia, hungary and austria. services incidental to manufacturing (pages 109 and 110). the commitments included in the schedule of latvia, lithuania and austria are withdrawn. education services (page 156): limitation to only privately funded services . this limitation was not included in the schedule of estonia, latvia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia (only not included with regard to adult education services) and slovakia. this limitation is now extended to these member states. in the case of slovenia, such an extension only refers to adult education services. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (pages 193, 213 and 217). the market access limitations indicating that the establishment of a specialised management company is required to perform the activities of management of unit trusts and investment companies and that only firms having their registered office in the community can act as depositories of the assets of investment funds , both under mode 1 and 3, were not included in the schedule of czech republic as regards mode 3, estonia (not included in mode 1 nor in mode 3), latvia as regards mode 3, lithuania as regards mode 1, hungary as regards mode 3 and slovakia as regards mode 3. these limitations are now extended to these member states. space transport. the commitment included in the schedule of austria is withdrawn. air transport - rental of aircraft with crew (page 246). two market access limitations (one under modes 1 and 2 and another one under mode 3) are introduced for poland. air transport - sales and marketing (pages 247 and 248). the schedule of specific commitments of estonia did not include the national treatment limitation on distribution through crs of air transport services provided by crs parent carrier. air transport - computer reservations system (page 248). the schedule of specific commitments of hungary did not include the national treatment limitation on the obligations of parent or participating carriers in respect of a crs controlled by an air carrier of one or more third countries. services auxiliary to all modes of transport - cargo handling services (page 259). a market access limitation under mode 3 has been introduced for estonia, latvia and lithuania. b) modifications notified in document s/secret/9 horizontal commitments cyprus' and malta's commitments on mode 4 under national treatment (pages 25, 29 and 32 of s/secret/8). these commitments are withdrawn. sectoral commitments computer and related services - a)consultancy services related to the installation of computer hardware (cpc 841) (page 82) - b) software implementation services (cpc 842) (page 83) - c) data processing services (cpc 843) (page 85) - d) data base services (cpc 844) (page 86). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. research and development services - b) r & d services on social sciences and humanities (cpc 852) (pages 89 and 90). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. insurance and insurance-related services - (i) direct insurance (including co-insurance): (a) life and (b) non-life (pages 211 and 212). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (x) (e) transferable securities (page 223). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. hotels, restaurants and catering (cpc 641,642 and 643) (page 232). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. travel agencies and tour operators services (cpc 7471) (pages 233 and 234). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. maritime transport services - excluding cabotage transport - (a) passenger transportation (cpc 7211); (b) freight transportation (cpc 7212) (page 242). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. annex ii compensation by the ec mode 3 horizontal limitation on public utilities footnote on coverage indicating that this limitation does not apply to telecommunication and computer and related services. mode 3 horizontal limitations on investment removal of the national treatment limitation for at in mode 3 on branches of foreign joint stock companies (aktiengesellschaften) and limited liability companies (gesellschaften mit beschr nkter haftung). mode 4 for intra-corporate transferees and business visitors market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in the horizontal section and in the sector-specific section in the sectors where cy and mt have undertaken mode 3 commitments. professional services - engineering services (cpc 8672) market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 2 market access commitments by cy, cz, mt & sk in mode 3 national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 3 removal of the market access limitation for pt in mode 3 professional services - integrated engineering services (cpc 8673): removal of the ent applied on mode 4/css by the uk market access and national treatment commitments by sk in mode 3 professional services - urban planning and landscape architectural services (cpc 8674): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, cz, mt, pl, si & sk in mode 3. market access and national treatment commitments by hu on landscape architectural services in mode 2. computer and related services - addition of a clarificatory footnote. market access and national treatment commitments by hu in modes 1, 2 & 3 for cpc 845 and 849 improved conditions for css/mode 4 by se for computer and related services in the horizontal section and new commitments by se for css/mode 4 for cpc 845 and 849. advertising services (cpc 871): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, mt & pl in mode 1 telecommunication services new and improved commitments by the entire ec as offered in its revised dda offer. a clarification from fi that its three mode 3 horizontal limitations on legal entities under market access, on subsidiaries, branches, agencies and representative offices under national treatment, and on investment under market access do not apply to telecommunications services. a clarificatory footnote indicating that sub-sectors 2.c.h) to 2.c.m) of the services sectoral classification list contained in mtn,gns/w/120 (value-added services) and sub-sectors 2.c.a) to 2.c.g) of that list are included here. sub-sector 2.c.o) of that list is also included here to the extent that it falls under this definition. for the purpose of this schedule, subsector 2c.n of that list (on-line information and/or data processing) is reflected in this schedule of commitments under 1.b (computer and related services). financial services (insurance services): removal of part of the market access limitations for sk in mode 3 financial services (banking) fi: change in mode 3 permanent residency requirements ( at least one of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the managing director shall have their permanent residence in the european community instead of at least one half of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the delegates, the managing director, the holder of the procuration and the person entitled to sign in the name of the credit institution shall have their place of residence in the european community ). hotels, restaurants and catering new (less restrictive) language for it's ent in mode 3 on bars, cafes and restaurants, including a commitment on its non-discriminatory nature. travel agencies and tour operators services removal of the ent applied on mode 3 by the cz hairdressing services market access and national treatment commitments by cz, fi, hu and sk in modes 2 & 3 the following abbreviations are used to indicate the member states: at austria be belgium cy cyprus cz czech republic de germany dk denmark ee estonia el greece es spain fi finland fr france hu hungary ie ireland it italy lt lithuania lu luxembourg lv latvia mt malta nl the netherlands pl poland pt portugal se sweden si slovenia sk slovak republic uk united kingdom joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and the republic of korea, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications, pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. following the submission of each communication, the republic of korea (hereafter korea) submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/173 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/226 with regard to s/secret/9). the ec and korea entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). during such negotiations, the ec and korea have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the withdrawals and modifications contained in document s/secret/8. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and korea was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. the report on the result of these negotiations, which is attached to this letter, includes (1) the proposed modifications in the notifications referred to above, (2) the agreed compensatory adjustments with regard to the modifications or withdrawals notified in s/secret/8, and (3) the draft consolidated schedule of specific commitments that results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and korea. this letter and annex i and ii of the report attached to it constitute the agreement between the ec and korea with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (1). the agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. the agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. report on the result of the negotiations conducted in accordance of article xxi:2(a) of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the gats (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999), the ec submits the following report: 1. on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications (hereafter "the proposed modifications"), pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. the proposed modifications are contained in annex i. 2. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/8, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, eighteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, chinese taipei, colombia, cuba, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, the philippines, switzerland, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 3. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/9, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, fourteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, colombia, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 4. the republic of korea (hereinafter korea) submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/173 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/226 with regard to s/secret/9. the ec and korea entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. 5. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). 6. during such negotiations, the ec and korea have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the modifications and withdrawals contained in document s/secret/8. annex i and ii of this report, together with the joint letter to which it is attached, constitute the agreement between the ec and korea with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (2). this agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. this agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. 7. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and korea was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. 8. in view of the foregoing, the proposed modifications and the agreed compensatory adjustments are incorporated into the ec's draft gats consolidated schedule, which results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and korea. 9. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. (1) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). (2) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). annex i a) modifications notified in document s/secret/8 horizontal commitments market access entry (page 9): in all ec member states services considered as public utilities at a national or local level may be subject to public monopolies or to exclusive rights granted to private operators . this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, austria, poland, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on branches, agencies and representative offices under mode 3 (pages 9 and 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidiaries under mode 3 (page 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, poland, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidies under mode 3 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, austria, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden included only part of the limitations on subsidies on mode 3 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. these limitations are now extended to these member states. national treatment limitation on subsidies under mode 4 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, hungary, malta and slovakia did not include the limitation on subsidies under mode 4 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. this limitation is now extended to these member states. cyprus' market access commitments on mode 4. these commitments are withdrawn. market access entry on mode 4 - intra-company transfers (ict) (page 26). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, latvia, lithuania, hungary, poland and slovakia did not include the limitation that the receiving entity must be effectively providing like services in the territory of the community member state concerned. this limitation is now extended to these member states. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) service sellers (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of poland did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public. this limitation is now extended to this member state. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) establishment of commercial presence (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of lithuania did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public or supplying services. this limitation is now extended to this member state. lithuanias market access commitments on mode 4 business visitors (bv) (page 32). these commitments are partially withdrawn. latvias market access commitment on mode 4 contractual services suppliers (css) (page 33). the schedule of specific commitments of latvia did not include the limitation that the temporary entry and stay within the member state concerned shall be for a period of not more than three months in any 12 months period. this limitation is now extended to this member state. sectoral commitments rental/leasing services without operators - relating to aircraft (page 95). the market access limitation under mode 2 is extended to estonia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia, finland and sweden and the market access limitation under mode 3 is extended to estonia, hungary and austria. services incidental to manufacturing (pages 109 and 110). the commitments included in the schedule of latvia, lithuania and austria are withdrawn. education services (page 156): limitation to only privately funded services . this limitation was not included in the schedule of estonia, latvia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia (only not included with regard to adult education services) and slovakia. this limitation is now extended to these member states. in the case of slovenia, such an extension only refers to adult education services. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (pages 193, 213 and 217). the market access limitations indicating that the establishment of a specialised management company is required to perform the activities of management of unit trusts and investment companies and that only firms having their registered office in the community can act as depositories of the assets of investment funds , both under mode 1 and 3, were not included in the schedule of czech republic as regards mode 3, estonia (not included in mode 1 nor in mode 3), latvia as regards mode 3, lithuania as regards mode 1, hungary as regards mode 3 and slovakia as regards mode 3. these limitations are now extended to these member states. space transport. the commitment included in the schedule of austria is withdrawn. air transport - rental of aircraft with crew (page 246). two market access limitations (one under modes 1 and 2 and another one under mode 3) are introduced for poland. air transport - sales and marketing (pages 247 and 248). the schedule of specific commitments of estonia did not include the national treatment limitation on distribution through crs of air transport services provided by crs parent carrier. air transport - computer reservations system (page 248). the schedule of specific commitments of hungary did not include the national treatment limitation on the obligations of parent or participating carriers in respect of a crs controlled by an air carrier of one or more third countries. services auxiliary to all modes of transport - cargo handling services (page 259). a market access limitation under mode 3 has been introduced for estonia, latvia and lithuania. b) modifications notified in document s/secret/9 horizontal commitments cyprus' and malta's commitments on mode 4 under national treatment (pages 25, 29 and 32 of s/secret/8). these commitments are withdrawn. sectoral commitments computer and related services - a)consultancy services related to the installation of computer hardware (cpc 841) (page 82) - b) software implementation services (cpc 842) (page 83) - c) data processing services (cpc 843) (page 85) - d) data base services (cpc 844) (page 86). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. research and development services - b) r & d services on social sciences and humanities (cpc 852) (pages 89 and 90). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. insurance and insurance-related services - (i) direct insurance (including co-insurance): (a) life and (b) non-life (pages 211 and 212). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (x) (e) transferable securities (page 223). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. hotels, restaurants and catering (cpc 641,642 and 643) (page 232). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. travel agencies and tour operators services (cpc 7471) (pages 233 and 234). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. maritime transport services - excluding cabotage transport - (a) passenger transportation (cpc 7211); (b) freight transportation (cpc 7212) (page 242). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. annex ii compensation by the ec mode 3 horizontal limitation on public utilities footnote on coverage indicating that this limitation does not apply to telecommunication and computer and related services. mode 3 horizontal limitations on investment removal of the national treatment limitation for at in mode 3 on branches of foreign joint stock companies (aktiengesellschaften) and limited liability companies (gesellschaften mit beschr nkter haftung). mode 4 for intra-corporate transferees and business visitors market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in the horizontal section and in the sector-specific section in the sectors where cy and mt have undertaken mode 3 commitments. professional services - engineering services (cpc 8672) market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 2 market access commitments by cy, cz, mt & sk in mode 3 national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 3 removal of the market access limitation for pt in mode 3 professional services - integrated engineering services (cpc 8673): removal of the ent applied on mode 4/css by the uk market access and national treatment commitments by sk in mode 3 professional services - urban planning and landscape architectural services (cpc 8674): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, cz, mt, pl, si & sk in mode 3. market access and national treatment commitments by hu on landscape architectural services in mode 2. computer and related services - addition of a clarificatory footnote. market access and national treatment commitments by hu in modes 1, 2 & 3 for cpc 845 and 849 improved conditions for css/mode 4 by se for computer and related services in the horizontal section and new commitments by se for css/mode 4 for cpc 845 and 849. advertising services (cpc 871): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, mt & pl in mode 1 telecommunication services new and improved commitments by the entire ec as offered in its revised dda offer. a clarification from fi that its three mode 3 horizontal limitations on legal entities under market access, on subsidiaries, branches, agencies and representative offices under national treatment, and on investment under market access do not apply to telecommunications services. a clarificatory footnote indicating that sub-sectors 2.c.h) to 2.c.m) of the services sectoral classification list contained in mtn,gns/w/120 (value-added services) and sub-sectors 2.c.a) to 2.c.g) of that list are included here. sub-sector 2.c.o) of that list is also included here to the extent that it falls under this definition. for the purpose of this schedule, subsector 2c.n of that list (on-line information and/or data processing) is reflected in this schedule of commitments under 1.b (computer and related services). financial services (insurance services): removal of part of the market access limitations for sk in mode 3 financial services (banking) fi: change in mode 3 permanent residency requirements ( at least one of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the managing director shall have their permanent residence in the european community instead of at least one half of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the delegates, the managing director, the holder of the procuration and the person entitled to sign in the name of the credit institution shall have their place of residence in the european community ). hotels, restaurants and catering new (less restrictive) language for it's ent in mode 3 on bars, cafes and restaurants, including a commitment on its non-discriminatory nature. travel agencies and tour operators services removal of the ent applied on mode 3 by the cz hairdressing services market access and national treatment commitments by cz, fi, hu and sk in modes 2 & 3 the following abbreviations are used to indicate the member states: at austria be belgium cy cyprus cz czech republic de germany dk denmark ee estonia el greece es spain fi finland fr france hu hungary ie ireland it italy lt lithuania lu luxembourg lv latvia mt malta nl the netherlands pl poland pt portugal se sweden si slovenia sk slovak republic uk united kingdom joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and new zealand, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications, pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. following the submission of each communication, new zealand submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/167 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/222 with regard to s/secret/9). the ec and new zealand entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). during such negotiations, the ec and new zealand have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the withdrawals and modifications contained in document s/secret/8. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and new zealand was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. the report on the result of these negotiations, which is attached to this letter, includes (1) the proposed modifications in the notifications referred to above, (2) the agreed compensatory adjustments with regard to the modifications or withdrawals notified in s/secret/8, and (3) the draft consolidated schedule of specific commitments that results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and new zealand. this letter and annex i and ii of the report attached to it constitute the agreement between the ec and new zealand with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats. (1) the agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. the agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. report on the result of the negotiations conducted in accordance of article xxi:2(a) of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the gats (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999), the ec submits the following report: 1. on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications (hereafter "the proposed modifications"), pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. the proposed modifications are contained in annex i. 2. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/8, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, eighteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, chinese taipei, colombia, cuba, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, the philippines, switzerland, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 3. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/9, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, fourteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, colombia, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 4. new zealand submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/167 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/222 with regard to s/secret/9). the ec and new zealand entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. 5. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). 6. during such negotiations, the ec and new zealand have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the modifications and withdrawals contained in document s/secret/8. annex i and ii of this report, together with the joint letter to which it is attached, constitute the agreement between the ec and new zealand with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats. (2) this agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. this agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. 7. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and new zealand was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. 8. in view of the foregoing, the proposed modifications and the agreed compensatory adjustments are incorporated into the ec's draft gats consolidated schedule, which results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and the new zealand. 9. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. (1) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). (2) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). annex i a) modifications notified in document s/secret/8 horizontal commitments market access entry (page 9): in all ec member states services considered as public utilities at a national or local level may be subject to public monopolies or to exclusive rights granted to private operators . this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, austria, poland, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on branches, agencies and representative offices under mode 3 (pages 9 and 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidiaries under mode 3 (page 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, poland, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidies under mode 3 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, austria, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden included only part of the limitations on subsidies on mode 3 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. these limitations are now extended to these member states. national treatment limitation on subsidies under mode 4 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, hungary, malta and slovakia did not include the limitation on subsidies under mode 4 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. this limitation is now extended to these member states. cyprus' market access commitments on mode 4. these commitments are withdrawn. market access entry on mode 4 - intra-company transfers (ict) (page 26). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, latvia, lithuania, hungary, poland and slovakia did not include the limitation that the receiving entity must be effectively providing like services in the territory of the community member state concerned. this limitation is now extended to these member states. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) service sellers (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of poland did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public. this limitation is now extended to this member state. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) establishment of commercial presence (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of lithuania did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public or supplying services. this limitation is now extended to this member state. lithuanias market access commitments on mode 4 business visitors (bv) (page 32). these commitments are partially withdrawn. latvias market access commitment on mode 4 contractual services suppliers (css) (page 33). the schedule of specific commitments of latvia did not include the limitation that the temporary entry and stay within the member state concerned shall be for a period of not more than three months in any 12 months period. this limitation is now extended to this member state. sectoral commitments rental/leasing services without operators - relating to aircraft (page 95). the market access limitation under mode 2 is extended to estonia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia, finland and sweden and the market access limitation under mode 3 is extended to estonia, hungary and austria. services incidental to manufacturing (pages 109 and 110). the commitments included in the schedule of latvia, lithuania and austria are withdrawn. education services (page 156): limitation to only privately funded services . this limitation was not included in the schedule of estonia, latvia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia (only not included with regard to adult education services) and slovakia. this limitation is now extended to these member states. in the case of slovenia, such an extension only refers to adult education services. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (pages 193, 213 and 217). the market access limitations indicating that the establishment of a specialised management company is required to perform the activities of management of unit trusts and investment companies and that only firms having their registered office in the community can act as depositories of the assets of investment funds , both under mode 1 and 3, were not included in the schedule of czech republic as regards mode 3, estonia (not included in mode 1 nor in mode 3), latvia as regards mode 3, lithuania as regards mode 1, hungary as regards mode 3 and slovakia as regards mode 3. these limitations are now extended to these member states. space transport. the commitment included in the schedule of austria is withdrawn. air transport - rental of aircraft with crew (page 246). two market access limitations (one under modes 1 and 2 and another one under mode 3) are introduced for poland. air transport - sales and marketing (pages 247 and 248). the schedule of specific commitments of estonia did not include the national treatment limitation on distribution through crs of air transport services provided by crs parent carrier. air transport - computer reservations system (page 248). the schedule of specific commitments of hungary did not include the national treatment limitation on the obligations of parent or participating carriers in respect of a crs controlled by an air carrier of one or more third countries. services auxiliary to all modes of transport - cargo handling services (page 259). a market access limitation under mode 3 has been introduced for estonia, latvia and lithuania. b) modifications notified in document s/secret/9 horizontal commitments cyprus' and malta's commitments on mode 4 under national treatment (pages 25, 29 and 32 of s/secret/8). these commitments are withdrawn. sectoral commitments computer and related services - a)consultancy services related to the installation of computer hardware (cpc 841) (page 82) - b) software implementation services (cpc 842) (page 83) - c) data processing services (cpc 843) (page 85) - d) data base services (cpc 844) (page 86). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. research and development services - b) r & d services on social sciences and humanities (cpc 852) (pages 89 and 90). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. insurance and insurance-related services - (i) direct insurance (including co-insurance): (a) life and (b) non-life (pages 211 and 212). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (x) (e) transferable securities (page 223). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. hotels, restaurants and catering (cpc 641,642 and 643) (page 232). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. travel agencies and tour operators services (cpc 7471) (pages 233 and 234). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. maritime transport services - excluding cabotage transport - (a) passenger transportation (cpc 7211); (b) freight transportation (cpc 7212) (page 242). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. annex ii compensation by the ec mode 3 horizontal limitation on public utilities footnote on coverage indicating that this limitation does not apply to telecommunication and computer and related services. mode 3 horizontal limitations on investment removal of the national treatment limitation for at in mode 3 on branches of foreign joint stock companies (aktiengesellschaften) and limited liability companies (gesellschaften mit beschr nkter haftung). mode 4 for intra-corporate transferees and business visitors market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in the horizontal section and in the sector-specific section in the sectors where cy and mt have undertaken mode 3 commitments. professional services - engineering services (cpc 8672) market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 2 market access commitments by cy, cz, mt & sk in mode 3 national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 3 removal of the market access limitation for pt in mode 3 professional services - integrated engineering services (cpc 8673): removal of the ent applied on mode 4/css by the uk market access and national treatment commitments by sk in mode 3 professional services - urban planning and landscape architectural services (cpc 8674): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, cz, mt, pl, si & sk in mode 3. market access and national treatment commitments by hu on landscape architectural services in mode 2. computer and related services - addition of a clarificatory footnote. market access and national treatment commitments by hu in modes 1, 2 & 3 for cpc 845 and 849 improved conditions for css/mode 4 by se for computer and related services in the horizontal section and new commitments by se for css/mode 4 for cpc 845 and 849. advertising services (cpc 871): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, mt & pl in mode 1 telecommunication services new and improved commitments by the entire ec as offered in its revised dda offer. a clarification from fi that its three mode 3 horizontal limitations on legal entities under market access, on subsidiaries, branches, agencies and representative offices under national treatment, and on investment under market access do not apply to telecommunications services. a clarificatory footnote indicating that sub-sectors 2.c.h) to 2.c.m) of the services sectoral classification list contained in mtn,gns/w/120 (value-added services) and sub-sectors 2.c.a) to 2.c.g) of that list are included here. sub-sector 2.c.o) of that list is also included here to the extent that it falls under this definition. for the purpose of this schedule, subsector 2c.n of that list (on-line information and/or data processing) is reflected in this schedule of commitments under 1.b (computer and related services). financial services (insurance services): removal of part of the market access limitations for sk in mode 3 financial services (banking) fi: change in mode 3 permanent residency requirements ( at least one of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the managing director shall have their permanent residence in the european community " instead of at least one half of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the delegates, the managing director, the holder of the procuration and the person entitled to sign in the name of the credit institution shall have their place of residence in the european community ). hotels, restaurants and catering new (less restrictive) language for it's ent in mode 3 on bars, cafes and restaurants, including a commitment on its non-discriminatory nature. travel agencies and tour operators services removal of the ent applied on mode 3 by the cz hairdressing services market access and national treatment commitments by cz, fi, hu and sk in modes 2 & 3 the following abbreviations are used to indicate the member states: at austria be belgium cy cyprus cz czech republic de germany dk denmark ee estonia el greece es spain fi finland fr france hu hungary ie ireland it italy lt lithuania lu luxembourg lv latvia mt malta nl the netherlands pl poland pt portugal se sweden si slovenia sk slovak republic uk united kingdom joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and the philippines, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications, pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. following the submission of the first communication, the philippines submitted a claim of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/179) with regard to s/secret/8. no claim of interest was submitted with regard to s/secret/9. the ec and the philippines entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). during such negotiations, the ec and the philippines have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the withdrawals and modifications contained in document s/secret/8. the report on the result of these negotiations, which is attached to this letter, includes (1) the proposed modifications in the notifications referred to above, (2) the agreed compensatory adjustments with regard to the modifications or withdrawals notified in s/secret/8, and (3) the draft consolidated schedule of specific commitments that results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and the philippines. this letter and annex i and ii of the report attached to it constitute the agreement between the ec and the philippines with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (1). the agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. the agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. report on the result of the negotiations conducted in accordance of article xxi:2(a) of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the gats (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999), the ec submits the following report: 1. on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications (hereafter "the proposed modifications"), pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. the proposed modifications are contained in annex i. 2. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/8, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, eighteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, chinese taipei, colombia, cuba, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, the philippines, switzerland, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 3. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/9, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, fourteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, colombia, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 4. the philippines submitted a claim of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/179) with regard to s/secret/8. no claim of interest was submitted with regard to s/secret/9. the ec and the philippines entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8. 5. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). 6. during such negotiations, the ec and the philippines have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the modifications and withdrawals contained in document s/secret/8. annex i and ii of this report, together with the joint letter to which it is attached, constitute the agreement between the ec and the philippines with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (2). this agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. this agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. 7. in view of the foregoing, the proposed modifications and the agreed compensatory adjustments are incorporated into the ec's draft gats consolidated schedule, which results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and the philippines. 8. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. (1) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). (2) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). annex i a) modifications notified in document s/secret/8 horizontal commitments market access entry (page 9): in all ec member states services considered as public utilities at a national or local level may be subject to public monopolies or to exclusive rights granted to private operators . this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, austria, poland, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on branches, agencies and representative offices under mode 3 (pages 9 and 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidiaries under mode 3 (page 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, poland, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidies under mode 3 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, austria, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden included only part of the limitations on subsidies on mode 3 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. these limitations are now extended to these member states. national treatment limitation on subsidies under mode 4 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, hungary, malta and slovakia did not include the limitation on subsidies under mode 4 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. this limitation is now extended to these member states. cyprus' market access commitments on mode 4. these commitments are withdrawn. market access entry on mode 4 - intra-company transfers (ict) (page 26). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, latvia, lithuania, hungary, poland and slovakia did not include the limitation that the receiving entity must be effectively providing like services in the territory of the community member state concerned. this limitation is now extended to these member states. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) service sellers (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of poland did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public. this limitation is now extended to this member state. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) establishment of commercial presence (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of lithuania did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public or supplying services. this limitation is now extended to this member state. lithuanias market access commitments on mode 4 business visitors (bv) (page 32). these commitments are partially withdrawn. latvias market access commitment on mode 4 contractual services suppliers (css) (page 33). the schedule of specific commitments of latvia did not include the limitation that the temporary entry and stay within the member state concerned shall be for a period of not more than three months in any 12 months period. this limitation is now extended to this member state. sectoral commitments rental/leasing services without operators - relating to aircraft (page 95). the market access limitation under mode 2 is extended to estonia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia, finland and sweden and the market access limitation under mode 3 is extended to estonia, hungary and austria. services incidental to manufacturing (pages 109 and 110). the commitments included in the schedule of latvia, lithuania and austria are withdrawn. education services (page 156): limitation to only privately funded services . this limitation was not included in the schedule of estonia, latvia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia (only not included with regard to adult education services) and slovakia. this limitation is now extended to these member states. in the case of slovenia, such an extension only refers to adult education services. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (pages 193, 213 and 217). the market access limitations indicating that the establishment of a specialised management company is required to perform the activities of management of unit trusts and investment companies and that only firms having their registered office in the community can act as depositories of the assets of investment funds , both under mode 1 and 3, were not included in the schedule of czech republic as regards mode 3, estonia (not included in mode 1 nor in mode 3), latvia as regards mode 3, lithuania as regards mode 1, hungary as regards mode 3 and slovakia as regards mode 3. these limitations are now extended to these member states. space transport. the commitment included in the schedule of austria is withdrawn. air transport - rental of aircraft with crew (page 246). two market access limitations (one under modes 1 and 2 and another one under mode 3) are introduced for poland. air transport - sales and marketing (pages 247 and 248). the schedule of specific commitments of estonia did not include the national treatment limitation on distribution through crs of air transport services provided by crs parent carrier. air transport - computer reservations system (page 248). the schedule of specific commitments of hungary did not include the national treatment limitation on the obligations of parent or participating carriers in respect of a crs controlled by an air carrier of one or more third countries. services auxiliary to all modes of transport - cargo handling services (page 259). a market access limitation under mode 3 has been introduced for estonia, latvia and lithuania. b) modifications notified in document s/secret/9 horizontal commitments cyprus' and malta's commitments on mode 4 under national treatment (pages 25, 29 and 32 of s/secret/8). these commitments are withdrawn. sectoral commitments computer and related services - a)consultancy services related to the installation of computer hardware (cpc 841) (page 82) - b) software implementation services (cpc 842) (page 83) - c) data processing services (cpc 843) (page 85) - d) data base services (cpc 844) (page 86). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. research and development services - b) r & d services on social sciences and humanities (cpc 852) (pages 89 and 90). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. insurance and insurance-related services - (i) direct insurance (including co-insurance): (a) life and (b) non-life (pages 211 and 212). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (x) (e) transferable securities (page 223). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. hotels, restaurants and catering (cpc 641,642 and 643) (page 232). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. travel agencies and tour operators services (cpc 7471) (pages 233 and 234). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. maritime transport services - excluding cabotage transport - (a) passenger transportation (cpc 7211); (b) freight transportation (cpc 7212) (page 242). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. annex ii compensation by the ec mode 3 horizontal limitation on public utilities footnote on coverage indicating that this limitation does not apply to telecommunication and computer and related services. mode 3 horizontal limitations on investment removal of the national treatment limitation for at in mode 3 on branches of foreign joint stock companies (aktiengesellschaften) and limited liability companies (gesellschaften mit beschr nkter haftung). mode 4 for intra-corporate transferees and business visitors market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in the horizontal section and in the sector-specific section in the sectors where cy and mt have undertaken mode 3 commitments. professional services - engineering services (cpc 8672) market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 2 market access commitments by cy, cz, mt & sk in mode 3 national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 3 removal of the market access limitation for pt in mode 3 professional services - integrated engineering services (cpc 8673): removal of the ent applied on mode 4/css by the uk market access and national treatment commitments by sk in mode 3 professional services - urban planning and landscape architectural services (cpc 8674): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, cz, mt, pl, si & sk in mode 3. market access and national treatment commitments by hu on landscape architectural services in mode 2. computer and related services - addition of a clarificatory footnote. market access and national treatment commitments by hu in modes 1, 2 & 3 for cpc 845 and 849 improved conditions for css/mode 4 by se for computer and related services in the horizontal section and new commitments by se for css/mode 4 for cpc 845 and 849. advertising services (cpc 871): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, mt & pl in mode 1 telecommunication services new and improved commitments by the entire ec as offered in its revised dda offer. a clarification from fi that its three mode 3 horizontal limitations on legal entities under market access, on subsidiaries, branches, agencies and representative offices under national treatment, and on investment under market access do not apply to telecommunications services. a clarificatory footnote indicating that sub-sectors 2.c.h) to 2.c.m) of the services sectoral classification list contained in mtn,gns/w/120 (value-added services) and sub-sectors 2.c.a) to 2.c.g) of that list are included here. sub-sector 2.c.o) of that list is also included here to the extent that it falls under this definition. for the purpose of this schedule, subsector 2c.n of that list (on-line information and/or data processing) is reflected in this schedule of commitments under 1.b (computer and related services). financial services (insurance services): removal of part of the market access limitations for sk in mode 3 financial services (banking) fi: change in mode 3 permanent residency requirements ( at least one of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the managing director shall have their permanent residence in the european community instead of at least one half of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the delegates, the managing director, the holder of the procuration and the person entitled to sign in the name of the credit institution shall have their place of residence in the european community ). hotels, restaurants and catering new (less restrictive) language for it's ent in mode 3 on bars, cafes and restaurants, including a commitment on its non-discriminatory nature. travel agencies and tour operators services removal of the ent applied on mode 3 by the cz hairdressing services market access and national treatment commitments by cz, fi, hu and sk in modes 2 & 3 the following abbreviations are used to indicate the member states: at austria be belgium cy cyprus cz czech republic de germany dk denmark ee estonia el greece es spain fi finland fr france hu hungary ie ireland it italy lt lithuania lu luxembourg lv latvia mt malta nl the netherlands pl poland pt portugal se sweden si slovenia sk slovak republic uk united kingdom joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and switzerland, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications, pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. following the submission of the first communication, switzerland submitted a claim of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/162) with regard to s/secret/8. no claim of interest was submitted with regard to s/secret/9. the ec and switzerland entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8. switzerland on its part submitted a memorandum stating its position in these negotiations. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). during such negotiations, the ec and switzerland have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the withdrawals and modifications contained in document s/secret/8. the report on the result of these negotiations, which is attached to this letter, includes (1) the proposed modifications in the notifications referred to above, (2) the agreed compensatory adjustments with regard to the modifications or withdrawals notified in s/secret/8, and (3) the draft consolidated schedule of specific commitments that results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and switzerland. this letter and annex i and ii of the report attached to it constitute the agreement between the ec and switzerland with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (1). the agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. the agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. report on the result of the negotiations conducted in accordance of article xxi:2(a) of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the gats (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999), the ec submits the following report: 1. on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications (hereafter "the proposed modifications"), pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. the proposed modifications are contained in annex i. 2. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/8, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, eighteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, chinese taipei, colombia, cuba, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, the philippines, switzerland, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 3. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/9, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, fourteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, colombia, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 4. switzerland submitted a claim of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/162) with regard to s/secret/8. no claim of interest was submitted with regard to s/secret/9. the ec and switzerland entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8. 5. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). 6. during such negotiations, the ec and switzerland have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the modifications and withdrawals contained in document s/secret/8. annex i and ii of this report, together with the joint letter to which it is attached, constitute the agreement between the ec and switzerland with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (2). this agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. this agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. 7. in view of the foregoing, the proposed modifications and the agreed compensatory adjustments are incorporated into the ec's draft gats consolidated schedule, which results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and switzerland. 8. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. (1) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). (2) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). annex i a) modifications notified in document s/secret/8 horizontal commitments market access entry (page 9): in all ec member states services considered as public utilities at a national or local level may be subject to public monopolies or to exclusive rights granted to private operators . this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, austria, poland, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on branches, agencies and representative offices under mode 3 (pages 9 and 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidiaries under mode 3 (page 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, poland, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidies under mode 3 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, austria, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden included only part of the limitations on subsidies on mode 3 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. these limitations are now extended to these member states. national treatment limitation on subsidies under mode 4 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, hungary, malta and slovakia did not include the limitation on subsidies under mode 4 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. this limitation is now extended to these member states. cyprus' market access commitments on mode 4. these commitments are withdrawn. market access entry on mode 4 - intra-company transfers (ict) (page 26). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, latvia, lithuania, hungary, poland and slovakia did not include the limitation that the receiving entity must be effectively providing like services in the territory of the community member state concerned. this limitation is now extended to these member states. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) service sellers (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of poland did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public. this limitation is now extended to this member state. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) establishment of commercial presence (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of lithuania did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public or supplying services. this limitation is now extended to this member state. lithuanias market access commitments on mode 4 business visitors (bv) (page 32). these commitments are partially withdrawn. latvias market access commitment on mode 4 contractual services suppliers (css) (page 33). the schedule of specific commitments of latvia did not include the limitation that the temporary entry and stay within the member state concerned shall be for a period of not more than three months in any 12 months period. this limitation is now extended to this member state. sectoral commitments rental/leasing services without operators - relating to aircraft (page 95). the market access limitation under mode 2 is extended to estonia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia, finland and sweden and the market access limitation under mode 3 is extended to estonia, hungary and austria. services incidental to manufacturing (pages 109 and 110). the commitments included in the schedule of latvia, lithuania and austria are withdrawn. education services (page 156): limitation to only privately funded services . this limitation was not included in the schedule of estonia, latvia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia (only not included with regard to adult education services) and slovakia. this limitation is now extended to these member states. in the case of slovenia, such an extension only refers to adult education services. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (pages 193, 213 and 217). the market access limitations indicating that the establishment of a specialised management company is required to perform the activities of management of unit trusts and investment companies and that only firms having their registered office in the community can act as depositories of the assets of investment funds , both under mode 1 and 3, were not included in the schedule of czech republic as regards mode 3, estonia (not included in mode 1 nor in mode 3), latvia as regards mode 3, lithuania as regards mode 1, hungary as regards mode 3 and slovakia as regards mode 3. these limitations are now extended to these member states. space transport. the commitment included in the schedule of austria is withdrawn. air transport - rental of aircraft with crew (page 246). two market access limitations (one under modes 1 and 2 and another one under mode 3) are introduced for poland. air transport - sales and marketing (pages 247 and 248). the schedule of specific commitments of estonia did not include the national treatment limitation on distribution through crs of air transport services provided by crs parent carrier. air transport - computer reservations system (page 248). the schedule of specific commitments of hungary did not include the national treatment limitation on the obligations of parent or participating carriers in respect of a crs controlled by an air carrier of one or more third countries. services auxiliary to all modes of transport - cargo handling services (page 259). a market access limitation under mode 3 has been introduced for estonia, latvia and lithuania. b) modifications notified in document s/secret/9 horizontal commitments cyprus' and malta's commitments on mode 4 under national treatment (pages 25, 29 and 32 of s/secret/8). these commitments are withdrawn. sectoral commitments computer and related services - a)consultancy services related to the installation of computer hardware (cpc 841) (page 82) - b) software implementation services (cpc 842) (page 83) - c) data processing services (cpc 843) (page 85) - d) data base services (cpc 844) (page 86). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. research and development services - b) r & d services on social sciences and humanities (cpc 852) (pages 89 and 90). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. insurance and insurance-related services - (i) direct insurance (including co-insurance): (a) life and (b) non-life (pages 211 and 212). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (x) (e) transferable securities (page 223). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. hotels, restaurants and catering (cpc 641,642 and 643) (page 232). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. travel agencies and tour operators services (cpc 7471) (pages 233 and 234). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. maritime transport services - excluding cabotage transport - (a) passenger transportation (cpc 7211); (b) freight transportation (cpc 7212) (page 242). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. annex ii compensation by the ec mode 3 horizontal limitation on public utilities footnote on coverage indicating that this limitation does not apply to telecommunication and computer and related services. mode 3 horizontal limitations on investment removal of the national treatment limitation for at in mode 3 on branches of foreign joint stock companies (aktiengesellschaften) and limited liability companies (gesellschaften mit beschr nkter haftung). mode 4 for intra-corporate transferees and business visitors market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in the horizontal section and in the sector-specific section in the sectors where cy and mt have undertaken mode 3 commitments. professional services - engineering services (cpc 8672) market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 2 market access commitments by cy, cz, mt & sk in mode 3 national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 3 removal of the market access limitation for pt in mode 3 professional services - integrated engineering services (cpc 8673): removal of the ent applied on mode 4/css by the uk market access and national treatment commitments by sk in mode 3 professional services - urban planning and landscape architectural services (cpc 8674): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, cz, mt, pl, si & sk in mode 3. market access and national treatment commitments by hu on landscape architectural services in mode 2. computer and related services - addition of a clarificatory footnote. market access and national treatment commitments by hu in modes 1, 2 & 3 for cpc 845 and 849 improved conditions for css/mode 4 by se for computer and related services in the horizontal section and new commitments by se for css/mode 4 for cpc 845 and 849. advertising services (cpc 871): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, mt & pl in mode 1 telecommunication services new and improved commitments by the entire ec as offered in its revised dda offer. a clarification from fi that its three mode 3 horizontal limitations on legal entities under market access, on subsidiaries, branches, agencies and representative offices under national treatment, and on investment under market access do not apply to telecommunications services. a clarificatory footnote indicating that sub-sectors 2.c.h) to 2.c.m) of the services sectoral classification list contained in mtn,gns/w/120 (value-added services) and sub-sectors 2.c.a) to 2.c.g) of that list are included here. sub-sector 2.c.o) of that list is also included here to the extent that it falls under this definition. for the purpose of this schedule, subsector 2c.n of that list (on-line information and/or data processing) is reflected in this schedule of commitments under 1.b (computer and related services). financial services (insurance services): removal of part of the market access limitations for sk in mode 3 financial services (banking) fi: change in mode 3 permanent residency requirements ( at least one of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the managing director shall have their permanent residence in the european community instead of at least one half of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the delegates, the managing director, the holder of the procuration and the person entitled to sign in the name of the credit institution shall have their place of residence in the european community ). hotels, restaurants and catering new (less restrictive) language for it's ent in mode 3 on bars, cafes and restaurants, including a commitment on its non-discriminatory nature. travel agencies and tour operators services removal of the ent applied on mode 3 by the cz hairdressing services market access and national treatment commitments by cz, fi, hu and sk in modes 2 & 3 the following abbreviations are used to indicate the member states: at austria be belgium cy cyprus cz czech republic de germany dk denmark ee estonia el greece es spain fi finland fr france hu hungary ie ireland it italy lt lithuania lu luxembourg lv latvia mt malta nl the netherlands pl poland pt portugal se sweden si slovenia sk slovak republic uk united kingdom joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and the separate customs territory of taiwan, penghu, kinmen and matsu, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications, pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. following the submission of the first communication, the separate customs territory of taiwan, penghu, kinmen and matsu submitted a claim of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/169) with regard to s/secret/8. no claim of interest was submitted with regard to s/secret/9. the ec and the separate customs territory of taiwan, penghu, kinmen and matsu entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). during such negotiations, the ec and the separate customs territory of taiwan, penghu, kinmen and matsu have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the withdrawals and modifications contained in document s/secret/8. the report on the result of these negotiations, which is attached to this letter, includes (1) the proposed modifications in the notifications referred to above, (2) the agreed compensatory adjustments with regard to the modifications or withdrawals notified in s/secret/8, and (3) the draft consolidated schedule of specific commitments that results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and the separate customs territory of taiwan, penghu, kinmen and matsu. this letter and annex i and ii of the report attached to it constitute the agreement between the ec and the separate customs territory of taiwan, penghu, kinmen and matsu with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (1). the agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. the agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. report on the result of the negotiations conducted in accordance of article xxi:2(a) of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the gats (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999), the ec submits the following report: 1. on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications (hereafter "the proposed modifications"), pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. the proposed modifications are contained in annex i. 2. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/8, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, eighteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, chinese taipei, colombia, cuba, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, the philippines, switzerland, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 3. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/9, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, fourteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, colombia, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 4. the separate customs territory of taiwan, penghu, kinmen and matsu submitted a claim of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/169) with regard to s/secret/8. no claim of interest was submitted with regard to s/secret/9. the ec and the separate customs territory of taiwan, penghu, kinmen and matsu entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8. 5. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). 6. during such negotiations, the ec and the separate customs territory of taiwan, penghu, kinmen and matsu have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the modifications and withdrawals contained in document s/secret/8. annex i and ii of this report, together with the joint letter to which it is attached, constitute the agreement between the ec and the separate customs territory of taiwan, penghu, kinmen and matsu with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (2). this agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. this agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. 7. in view of the foregoing, the proposed modifications and the agreed compensatory adjustments are incorporated into the ec's draft gats consolidated schedule, which results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and the separate customs territory of taiwan, penghu, kinmen and matsu. 8. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. (1) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). (2) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). annex i a) modifications notified in document s/secret/8 horizontal commitments market access entry (page 9): in all ec member states services considered as public utilities at a national or local level may be subject to public monopolies or to exclusive rights granted to private operators . this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, austria, poland, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on branches, agencies and representative offices under mode 3 (pages 9 and 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidiaries under mode 3 (page 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, poland, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidies under mode 3 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, austria, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden included only part of the limitations on subsidies on mode 3 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. these limitations are now extended to these member states. national treatment limitation on subsidies under mode 4 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, hungary, malta and slovakia did not include the limitation on subsidies under mode 4 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. this limitation is now extended to these member states. cyprus' market access commitments on mode 4. these commitments are withdrawn. market access entry on mode 4 - intra-company transfers (ict) (page 26). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, latvia, lithuania, hungary, poland and slovakia did not include the limitation that the receiving entity must be effectively providing like services in the territory of the community member state concerned. this limitation is now extended to these member states. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) service sellers (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of poland did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public. this limitation is now extended to this member state. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) establishment of commercial presence (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of lithuania did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public or supplying services. this limitation is now extended to this member state. lithuanias market access commitments on mode 4 business visitors (bv) (page 32). these commitments are partially withdrawn. latvias market access commitment on mode 4 contractual services suppliers (css) (page 33). the schedule of specific commitments of latvia did not include the limitation that the temporary entry and stay within the member state concerned shall be for a period of not more than three months in any 12 months period. this limitation is now extended to this member state. sectoral commitments rental/leasing services without operators - relating to aircraft (page 95). the market access limitation under mode 2 is extended to estonia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia, finland and sweden and the market access limitation under mode 3 is extended to estonia, hungary and austria. services incidental to manufacturing (pages 109 and 110). the commitments included in the schedule of latvia, lithuania and austria are withdrawn. education services (page 156): limitation to only privately funded services . this limitation was not included in the schedule of estonia, latvia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia (only not included with regard to adult education services) and slovakia. this limitation is now extended to these member states. in the case of slovenia, such an extension only refers to adult education services. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (pages 193, 213 and 217). the market access limitations indicating that the establishment of a specialised management company is required to perform the activities of management of unit trusts and investment companies and that only firms having their registered office in the community can act as depositories of the assets of investment funds , both under mode 1 and 3, were not included in the schedule of czech republic as regards mode 3, estonia (not included in mode 1 nor in mode 3), latvia as regards mode 3, lithuania as regards mode 1, hungary as regards mode 3 and slovakia as regards mode 3. these limitations are now extended to these member states. space transport. the commitment included in the schedule of austria is withdrawn. air transport - rental of aircraft with crew (page 246). two market access limitations (one under modes 1 and 2 and another one under mode 3) are introduced for poland. air transport - sales and marketing (pages 247 and 248). the schedule of specific commitments of estonia did not include the national treatment limitation on distribution through crs of air transport services provided by crs parent carrier. air transport - computer reservations system (page 248). the schedule of specific commitments of hungary did not include the national treatment limitation on the obligations of parent or participating carriers in respect of a crs controlled by an air carrier of one or more third countries. services auxiliary to all modes of transport - cargo handling services (page 259). a market access limitation under mode 3 has been introduced for estonia, latvia and lithuania. b) modifications notified in document s/secret/9 horizontal commitments cyprus' and malta's commitments on mode 4 under national treatment (pages 25, 29 and 32 of s/secret/8). these commitments are withdrawn. sectoral commitments computer and related services - a)consultancy services related to the installation of computer hardware (cpc 841) (page 82) - b) software implementation services (cpc 842) (page 83) - c) data processing services (cpc 843) (page 85) - d) data base services (cpc 844) (page 86). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. research and development services - b) r & d services on social sciences and humanities (cpc 852) (pages 89 and 90). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. insurance and insurance-related services - (i) direct insurance (including co-insurance): (a) life and (b) non-life (pages 211 and 212). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (x) (e) transferable securities (page 223). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. hotels, restaurants and catering (cpc 641,642 and 643) (page 232). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. travel agencies and tour operators services (cpc 7471) (pages 233 and 234). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. maritime transport services - excluding cabotage transport - (a) passenger transportation (cpc 7211); (b) freight transportation (cpc 7212) (page 242). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. annex ii compensation by the ec mode 3 horizontal limitation on public utilities footnote on coverage indicating that this limitation does not apply to telecommunication and computer and related services. mode 3 horizontal limitations on investment removal of the national treatment limitation for at in mode 3 on branches of foreign joint stock companies (aktiengesellschaften) and limited liability companies (gesellschaften mit beschr nkter haftung). mode 4 for intra-corporate transferees and business visitors market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in the horizontal section and in the sector-specific section in the sectors where cy and mt have undertaken mode 3 commitments. professional services - engineering services (cpc 8672) market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 2 market access commitments by cy, cz, mt & sk in mode 3 national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 3 removal of the market access limitation for pt in mode 3 professional services - integrated engineering services (cpc 8673): removal of the ent applied on mode 4/css by the uk market access and national treatment commitments by sk in mode 3 professional services - urban planning and landscape architectural services (cpc 8674): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, cz, mt, pl, si & sk in mode 3. market access and national treatment commitments by hu on landscape architectural services in mode 2. computer and related services - addition of a clarificatory footnote. market access and national treatment commitments by hu in modes 1, 2 & 3 for cpc 845 and 849 improved conditions for css/mode 4 by se for computer and related services in the horizontal section and new commitments by se for css/mode 4 for cpc 845 and 849. advertising services (cpc 871): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, mt & pl in mode 1 telecommunication services new and improved commitments by the entire ec as offered in its revised dda offer. a clarification from fi that its three mode 3 horizontal limitations on legal entities under market access, on subsidiaries, branches, agencies and representative offices under national treatment, and on investment under market access do not apply to telecommunications services. a clarificatory footnote indicating that sub-sectors 2.c.h) to 2.c.m) of the services sectoral classification list contained in mtn,gns/w/120 (value-added services) and sub-sectors 2.c.a) to 2.c.g) of that list are included here. sub-sector 2.c.o) of that list is also included here to the extent that it falls under this definition. for the purpose of this schedule, subsector 2c.n of that list (on-line information and/or data processing) is reflected in this schedule of commitments under 1.b (computer and related services). financial services (insurance services): removal of part of the market access limitations for sk in mode 3 financial services (banking) fi: change in mode 3 permanent residency requirements ( at least one of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the managing director shall have their permanent residence in the european community " instead of at least one half of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the delegates, the managing director, the holder of the procuration and the person entitled to sign in the name of the credit institution shall have their place of residence in the european community ). hotels, restaurants and catering new (less restrictive) language for it's ent in mode 3 on bars, cafes and restaurants, including a commitment on its non-discriminatory nature. travel agencies and tour operators services removal of the ent applied on mode 3 by the cz hairdressing services market access and national treatment commitments by cz, fi, hu and sk in modes 2 & 3 the following abbreviations are used to indicate the member states: at austria be belgium cy cyprus cz czech republic de germany dk denmark ee estonia el greece es spain fi finland fr france hu hungary ie ireland it italy lt lithuania lu luxembourg lv latvia mt malta nl the netherlands pl poland pt portugal se sweden si slovenia sk slovak republic uk united kingdom joint letter from the european communities and its member states on the one part, and the united states of america, on the other part, pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the gats (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications, pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. following the submission of each communication, the united states of america (hereafter the united states) submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/166 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/217 with regard to s/secret/9). the ec and the united states entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). during such negotiations, the ec and the united states have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the withdrawals and modifications contained in document s/secret/8. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and the united states was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. the report on the result of these negotiations, which is attached to this letter, includes (1) the proposed modifications in the notifications referred to above, (2) the agreed compensatory adjustments with regard to the modifications or withdrawals notified in s/secret/8, and (3) the draft consolidated schedule of specific commitments that results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and the united states. this letter and annex i and ii of the report attached to it constitute the agreement between the ec and the united states with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (1). the agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. the agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. report on the result of the negotiations conducted in accordance of article xxi:2(a) of the general agreement on trade in services (gats) relating to the modifications proposed in the gats schedules of the european communities and its member states (hereafter the ec) to take account of the accession of the czech republic, the republic of estonia, the republic of cyprus, the republic of latvia, the republic of lithuania, the republic of hungary, the republic of malta, the republic of austria, the republic of poland, the republic of slovenia, the slovak republic, the republic of finland, the kingdom of sweden to the european communities pursuant to paragraph 5 of the procedures for the implementation of article xxi of the gats (s/l/80 of 29 october 1999), the ec submits the following report: 1. on 28 may 2004 and on 4 april 2005, the ec submitted two respective communications pursuant to article v of the gats (circulated as document s/secret/8, dated 11 june 2004, and as document s/secret/9, dated 12 april 2005), whereby it notified its intention to modify or withdraw the specific commitments included in the list attached to the communications (hereafter "the proposed modifications"), pursuant to article v:5 of the gats and in accordance with the terms of article xxi:1(b) of the gats. the proposed modifications are contained in annex i. 2. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/8, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, eighteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, chinese taipei, colombia, cuba, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, the philippines, switzerland, uruguay and the united states of america (hereafter the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 3. following the submission of the notification contained in document s/secret/9, and pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats, fourteen wto members (argentina, australia, brazil, canada, china, colombia, ecuador, hong kong china, india, japan, korea, new zealand, uruguay and the united states) submitted a respective claim of interest. 4. the united states submitted two respective claims of interest pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats (s/l/166 with regard to s/secret/8 and s/l/217 with regard to s/secret/9. the ec and the united states entered into negotiations pursuant to article xxi:2(a) of the gats with regard to s/secret/8 and s/secret/9. 5. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/8, the initial period for the negotiations, which expired on 26 october 2004, was extended (by mutual agreement) five times (until 26 april 2005, until 27 february 2006, until 1 june 2006, until 1 july and until 17 july 2006). 6. during such negotiations, the ec and the united states have agreed on compensatory adjustments related to the modifications and withdrawals contained in document s/secret/8. annex i and ii of this report, together with the joint letter to which it is attached, constitute the agreement between the ec and the united states with regard to s/secret/8 for purposes of article xxi:2(a) of the gats (2). this agreement shall not be interpreted to modify the lists of article ii exemptions of the ec and its member states. this agreement shall not be interpreted to affect the parties' rights and obligations under article viii of the gats. 7. with regard to the procedure initiated by the notification contained in document s/secret/9, no agreement between the ec and the united states was reached by the end of the period provided for negotiations and no affected member referred the matter to arbitration within the applicable deadline pursuant to paragraph 7 of s/l/80. pursuant to article xxi:3(b) of the gats and subject to completion of the procedures set out in paragraphs 20-22 of s/l/80, the ec shall be free to implement the modifications and withdrawals proposed in document s/secret/9. 8. in view of the foregoing, the proposed modifications and the agreed compensatory adjustments are incorporated into the ec's draft gats consolidated schedule, which results from merging existing schedules of commitments of the ec and its member states and from inserting therein both the modifications or withdrawals of commitments notified by the ec under documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 and the compensatory adjustments agreed between the ec and the united states. 9. pursuant to the procedures referred to in paragraphs 20 to 22 of s/l/80, the ec will transmit, to the secretariat for circulation, the draft consolidated schedule for certification by 14 september 2006, provided that an agreement has been signed with all affected members, or the period foreseen in paragraph 7 of s/l/80 has expired, and no arbitration has been requested. the results of the negotiations are to enter into force, after completion of the certification procedures, on a date to be specified by the ec following completion of the ec's internal approval procedures, which the ec endeavours to accelerate as much as possible. the modifications and withdrawals proposed in documents s/secret/8 and s/secret/9 shall not enter into force until all of the compensatory adjustments indicated in annex ii have entered into force. (1) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). (2) this agreement shall not be interpreted to prejudge the outcome of separate discussions within the wto concerning the classification of telecommunication services (basic telecommunications and value-added services). annex i a) modifications notified in document s/secret/8 horizontal commitments market access entry (page 9): in all ec member states services considered as public utilities at a national or local level may be subject to public monopolies or to exclusive rights granted to private operators . this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, austria, poland, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on branches, agencies and representative offices under mode 3 (pages 9 and 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidiaries under mode 3 (page 10). this entry was not included in the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, hungary, malta, poland, slovenia and slovakia. this limitation now applies to all member states. national treatment limitations on subsidies under mode 3 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, lithuania, malta, austria, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden included only part of the limitations on subsidies on mode 3 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. these limitations are now extended to these member states. national treatment limitation on subsidies under mode 4 (page 13). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, estonia, cyprus, latvia, hungary, malta and slovakia did not include the limitation on subsidies under mode 4 inscribed in the schedule of the ec and its member states. this limitation is now extended to these member states. cyprus' market access commitments on mode 4. these commitments are withdrawn. market access entry on mode 4 - intra-company transfers (ict) (page 26). the schedule of specific commitments of the czech republic, latvia, lithuania, hungary, poland and slovakia did not include the limitation that the receiving entity must be effectively providing like services in the territory of the community member state concerned. this limitation is now extended to these member states. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) service sellers (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of poland did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public. this limitation is now extended to this member state. market access entry on mode 4 - business visitors (bv) establishment of commercial presence (page 30). the schedule of specific commitments of lithuania did not include the limitation that those representatives will not be engaged in making direct sales to the general public or supplying services. this limitation is now extended to this member state. lithuanias market access commitments on mode 4 business visitors (bv) (page 32). these commitments are partially withdrawn. latvias market access commitment on mode 4 contractual services suppliers (css) (page 33). the schedule of specific commitments of latvia did not include the limitation that the temporary entry and stay within the member state concerned shall be for a period of not more than three months in any 12 months period. this limitation is now extended to this member state. sectoral commitments rental/leasing services without operators - relating to aircraft (page 95). the market access limitation under mode 2 is extended to estonia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia, finland and sweden and the market access limitation under mode 3 is extended to estonia, hungary and austria. services incidental to manufacturing (pages 109 and 110). the commitments included in the schedule of latvia, lithuania and austria are withdrawn. education services (page 156): limitation to only privately funded services . this limitation was not included in the schedule of estonia, latvia, lithuania, hungary, austria, slovenia (only not included with regard to adult education services) and slovakia. this limitation is now extended to these member states. in the case of slovenia, such an extension only refers to adult education services. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (pages 193, 213 and 217). the market access limitations indicating that the establishment of a specialised management company is required to perform the activities of management of unit trusts and investment companies and that only firms having their registered office in the community can act as depositories of the assets of investment funds , both under mode 1 and 3, were not included in the schedule of czech republic as regards mode 3, estonia (not included in mode 1 nor in mode 3), latvia as regards mode 3, lithuania as regards mode 1, hungary as regards mode 3 and slovakia as regards mode 3. these limitations are now extended to these member states. space transport. the commitment included in the schedule of austria is withdrawn. air transport - rental of aircraft with crew (page 246). two market access limitations (one under modes 1 and 2 and another one under mode 3) are introduced for poland. air transport - sales and marketing (pages 247 and 248). the schedule of specific commitments of estonia did not include the national treatment limitation on distribution through crs of air transport services provided by crs parent carrier. air transport - computer reservations system (page 248). the schedule of specific commitments of hungary did not include the national treatment limitation on the obligations of parent or participating carriers in respect of a crs controlled by an air carrier of one or more third countries. services auxiliary to all modes of transport - cargo handling services (page 259). a market access limitation under mode 3 has been introduced for estonia, latvia and lithuania. b) modifications notified in document s/secret/9 horizontal commitments cyprus' and malta's commitments on mode 4 under national treatment (pages 25, 29 and 32 of s/secret/8). these commitments are withdrawn. sectoral commitments computer and related services - a)consultancy services related to the installation of computer hardware (cpc 841) (page 82) - b) software implementation services (cpc 842) (page 83) - c) data processing services (cpc 843) (page 85) - d) data base services (cpc 844) (page 86). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. research and development services - b) r & d services on social sciences and humanities (cpc 852) (pages 89 and 90). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. insurance and insurance-related services - (i) direct insurance (including co-insurance): (a) life and (b) non-life (pages 211 and 212). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. banking and other financial services (excluding insurance) (x) (e) transferable securities (page 223). cyprus' commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. hotels, restaurants and catering (cpc 641,642 and 643) (page 232). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. travel agencies and tour operators services (cpc 7471) (pages 233 and 234). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. maritime transport services - excluding cabotage transport - (a) passenger transportation (cpc 7211); (b) freight transportation (cpc 7212) (page 242). malta's commitments on mode 4 (ict, bv and css) under national treatment are withdrawn. annex ii compensation by the ec mode 3 horizontal limitation on public utilities footnote on coverage indicating that this limitation does not apply to telecommunication and computer and related services. mode 3 horizontal limitations on investment removal of the national treatment limitation for at in mode 3 on branches of foreign joint stock companies (aktiengesellschaften) and limited liability companies (gesellschaften mit beschr nkter haftung). mode 4 for intra-corporate transferees and business visitors market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in the horizontal section and in the sector-specific section in the sectors where cy and mt have undertaken mode 3 commitments. professional services - engineering services (cpc 8672) market access and national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 2 market access commitments by cy, cz, mt & sk in mode 3 national treatment commitments by cy and mt in mode 3 removal of the market access limitation for pt in mode 3 professional services - integrated engineering services (cpc 8673): removal of the ent applied on mode 4/css by the uk market access and national treatment commitments by sk in mode 3 professional services - urban planning and landscape architectural services (cpc 8674): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, cz, mt, pl, si & sk in mode 3. market access and national treatment commitments by hu on landscape architectural services in mode 2. computer and related services - addition of a clarificatory footnote. market access and national treatment commitments by hu in modes 1, 2 & 3 for cpc 845 and 849 improved conditions for css/mode 4 by se for computer and related services in the horizontal section and new commitments by se for css/mode 4 for cpc 845 and 849. advertising services (cpc 871): market access and national treatment commitments by cy, mt & pl in mode 1 telecommunication services new and improved commitments by the entire ec as offered in its revised dda offer. a clarification from fi that its three mode 3 horizontal limitations on legal entities under market access, on subsidiaries, branches, agencies and representative offices under national treatment, and on investment under market access do not apply to telecommunications services. a clarificatory footnote indicating that sub-sectors 2.c.h) to 2.c.m) of the services sectoral classification list contained in mtn,gns/w/120 (value-added services) and sub-sectors 2.c.a) to 2.c.g) of that list are included here. sub-sector 2.c.o) of that list is also included here to the extent that it falls under this definition. for the purpose of this schedule, subsector 2c.n of that list (on-line information and/or data processing) is reflected in this schedule of commitments under 1.b (computer and related services). financial services (insurance services): removal of part of the market access limitations for sk in mode 3 financial services (banking) fi: change in mode 3 permanent residency requirements ( at least one of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the managing director shall have their permanent residence in the european community instead of at least one half of the founders, the members of the board of directors, the supervisory board and the delegates, the managing director, the holder of the procuration and the person entitled to sign in the name of the credit institution shall have their place of residence in the european community ). hotels, restaurants and catering new (less restrictive) language for it's ent in mode 3 on bars, cafes and restaurants, including a commitment on its non-discriminatory nature. travel agencies and tour operators services removal of the ent applied on mode 3 by the cz hairdressing services market access and national treatment commitments by cz, fi, hu and sk in modes 2 & 3 the following abbreviations are used to indicate the member states: at austria be belgium cy cyprus cz czech republic de germany dk denmark ee estonia el greece es spain fi finland fr france hu hungary ie ireland it italy lt lithuania lu luxembourg lv latvia mt malta nl the netherlands pl poland pt portugal se sweden si slovenia sk slovak republic uk united kingdom

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/490 of 25 march 2019 amending the annex to implementing decision (eu) 2017/247 on protective measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain member states (notified under document c(2019) 2347) (text with eea relevance.) type: decision_impl subject matter: regions of eu member states; agricultural policy; agricultural activity; europe date published: 2019-03-26 26.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 84/37 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/490 of 25 march 2019 amending the annex to implementing decision (eu) 2017/247 on protective measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain member states (notified under document c(2019) 2347) (text with eea relevance) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to council directive 89/662/eec of 11 december 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), and in particular article 9(4) thereof, having regard to council directive 90/425/eec of 26 june 1990 concerning veterinary checks applicable in intra-union trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (2), and in particular article 10(4) thereof, whereas: (1) commission implementing decision (eu) 2017/247 (3) was adopted following outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype h5 in a number of member states (the concerned member states), and the establishment of protection and surveillance zones by the competent authority of the concerned member states in accordance with article 16(1) of council directive 2005/94/ec (4). (2) implementing decision (eu) 2017/247 provides that the protection and surveillance zones established by the competent authorities of the concerned member states in accordance with directive 2005/94/ec are to comprise at least the areas listed as protection and surveillance zones in the annex to that implementing decision. implementing decision (eu) 2017/247 also lays down that the measures to be applied in the protection and surveillance zones, as provided for in article 29(1) and article 31 of directive 2005/94/ec, are to be maintained until at least the dates for those zones set out in the annex to that implementing decision. (3) since the date of its adoption, implementing decision (eu) 2017/247 has been amended several times to take account of developments in the epidemiological situation in the union as regards avian influenza. in particular, implementing decision (eu) 2017/247 was amended by commission implementing decision (eu) 2017/696 (5) in order to lay down rules regarding the dispatch of consignments of day-old chicks from the areas listed in the annex to implementing decision (eu) 2017/247. that amendment took into account the fact that day-old chicks pose a very low risk for the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza compared to other poultry commodities. (4) implementing decision (eu) 2017/247 was also subsequently amended by commission implementing decision (eu) 2017/1841 (6) in order to strengthen the disease control measures applicable where there is an increased risk for the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza. consequently, implementing decision (eu) 2017/247 now provides for the establishment at union level of further restricted zones in the concerned member states, as referred to in article 16(4) of directive 2005/94/ec, following an outbreak or outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza, and the duration of the measures to be applied therein. implementing decision (eu) 2017/247 now also lays down rules for the dispatch of live poultry, day-old chicks and hatching eggs from the further restricted zones to other member states, subject to certain conditions. (5) in addition, the annex to implementing decision (eu) 2017/247 has been amended numerous times, mainly to take account of changes in the boundaries of the protection and surveillance zones established by the concerned member states in accordance with directive 2005/94/ec. (6) the annex to implementing decision (eu) 2017/247 was last amended by commission implementing decision (eu) 2018/1842 (7), following the notification by bulgaria of further outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in poultry holdings in the regions of haskovo and stara zagora of that member state. bulgaria also notified the commission that it had duly taken the necessary measures required in accordance with directive 2005/94/ec following these outbreaks, including the establishment of protection and surveillance zones around the infected poultry holdings. (7) since the date of the last amendment made to implementing decision (eu) 2017/247 by implementing decision (eu) 2018/1842, bulgaria has notified the commission of a new outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype h5 in the region of lovech of that member state. (8) bulgaria has also notified the commission that it has taken the necessary measures required in accordance with directive 2005/94/ec following the outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza in the region of lovech, including the establishment of protection and surveillance zones around the infected poultry holding in that member state. (9) the commission has examined those measures in collaboration with bulgaria, and the commission is satisfied that the boundaries of the protection and surveillance zones, established by the competent authority of bulgaria, are at a sufficient distance to the poultry holdings where the recent outbreak has been confirmed. (10) in order to prevent any unnecessary disturbance to trade within the union, and to avoid unjustified barriers to trade being imposed by third countries, it is necessary to rapidly describe at union level, in collaboration with bulgaria, the protection and surveillance zones established in bulgaria, in accordance with directive 2005/94/ec, following the new outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza in that member state. (11) implementing decision (eu) 2017/247 should therefore be updated to take account of the up-to-date epidemiological situation in bulgaria, as regards highly pathogenic avian influenza. in particular, the newly established protection and surveillance zones in bulgaria, now subject to movement restrictions in accordance with directive 2005/94/ec, should be listed in the annex to implementing decision (eu) 2017/247. (12) the annex to implementing decision (eu) 2017/247 should be amended to update regionalisation at union level in order to include the protection and surveillance zones established in bulgaria, in accordance with directive 2005/94/ec, following the new outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza in that member state, and the duration of the restrictions applicable therein. (13) implementing decision (eu) 2017/247 should therefore be amended accordingly. (14) the measures provided for in this decision are in accordance with the opinion of the standing committee on plants, animals, food and feed, has adopted this decision: article 1 the annex to implementing decision (eu) 2017/247 is amended in accordance with the annex to this decision. article 2 this decision is addressed to the member states. done at brussels, 25 march 2019. for the commission vytenis andriukaitis member of the commission (1) oj l 395, 30.12.1989, p. 13. (2) oj l 224, 18.8.1990, p. 29. (3) commission implementing decision (eu) 2017/247 of 9 february 2017 on protective measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain member states (oj l 36, 11.2.2017, p. 62). (4) council directive 2005/94/ec of 20 december 2005 on community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing directive 92/40/eec (oj l 10, 14.1.2006, p. 16). (5) commission implementing decision (eu) 2017/696 of 11 april 2017 amending implementing decision (eu) 2017/247 on protective measures in relation to outbreaks of the highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain member states (oj l 101, 13.4.2017, p. 80). (6) commission implementing decision (eu) 2017/1841 of 10 october 2017 amending implementing decision (eu) 2017/247 on protective measures in relation to outbreaks of the highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain member states (oj l 261, 11.10.2017, p. 26). (7) commission implementing decision (eu) 2018/1842 of 22 november 2018 amending the annex to implementing decision (eu) 2017/247 on protective measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain member states (oj l 298, 23.11.2018, p. 65). annex the annex to implementing decision (eu) 2017/247 is amended as follows: (1) in part a, the entry for bulgaria is replaced by the following: member state: bulgaria area comprising: date until applicable in accordance with article 29(1) of directive 2005/94/ec lovech region: municipality of lovech: lisets bahovitsa 12.4.2019 (2) in part b, the entry for bulgaria is replaced by the following: member state: bulgaria area comprising: date until applicable in accordance with article 31 of directive 2005/94/ec lovech region: municipality of lovech: lisets bahovitsa from 13.4.2019 to 21.4.2019 municipality of lovech: lovech slavyani slatina goran umarevtsi presyaka izvorche radyuvene skobelevo 21.4.2019 pleven region: municipality of pleven: nikolaevo 21.4.2019

name: council decision (eu) 2019/483 of 19 march 2019 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the european union, within the eea joint committee, concerning the amendment of annex ix (financial services) to the eea agreement (capital requirements regulation (eu) no 575/2013 (crr) and directive 2013/36/eu (crd iv)) (text with eea relevance.) type: decision subject matter: european construction; free movement of capital; management; financial institutions and credit; international affairs date published: 2019-03-25 25.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 82/29 council decision (eu) 2019/483 of 19 march 2019 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the european union, within the eea joint committee, concerning the amendment of annex ix (financial services) to the eea agreement (capital requirements regulation (eu) no 575/2013 (crr) and directive 2013/36/eu (crd iv)) (text with eea relevance) the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 114 in conjunction with article 218(9) thereof, having regard to council regulation (ec) no 2894/94 of 28 november 1994 concerning arrangements for implementing the agreement on the european economic area (1), and in particular article 1(3) thereof, having regard to the proposal from the european commission, whereas: (1) the agreement on the european economic area (2) (the eea agreement) entered into force on 1 january 1994. (2) pursuant to article 98 of the eea agreement, the eea joint committee may decide to amend, inter alia, annex ix to that agreement, which contains provisions on financial services. (3) regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council (3) and directive 2013/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council (4) are to be incorporated into the eea agreement. (4) annex ix to the eea agreement should therefore be amended accordingly. (5) the position of the union within the eea joint committee should therefore be based on the attached draft decision, has adopted this decision: article 1 the position to be adopted, on behalf of the union, within the eea joint committee on the proposed amendment of annex ix (financial services) to the eea agreement, shall be based on the draft decision of the eea joint committee attached to this decision. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at brussels, 19 march 2019. for the council the president g. ciamba (1) oj l 305, 30.11.1994, p. 6. (2) oj l 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3. (3) regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council of 26 june 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending regulation (eu) no 648/2012 (oj l 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1). (4) directive 2013/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 26 june 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending directive 2002/87/ec and repealing directives 2006/48/ec and 2006/49/ec (oj l 176, 27.6.2013, p. 338). draft decision of the eea joint committee no /2019 of amending annex ix (financial services) to the eea agreement the eea joint committee, having regard to the agreement on the european economic area (the eea agreement), and in particular article 98 thereof, whereas: (1) regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council of 26 june 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending regulation (eu) no 648/2012 (1), as corrected by oj l 208, 2.8.2013, p. 68, oj l 321, 30.11.2013, p. 6 and oj l 20, 25.1.2017, p. 2, is to be incorporated into the eea agreement. (2) regulation (eu) 2017/2395 of the european parliament and of the council of 12 december 2017 amending regulation (eu) no 575/2013 as regards transitional arrangements for mitigating the impact of the introduction of ifrs 9 on own funds and for the large exposures treatment of certain public sector exposures denominated in the domestic currency of any member state (2), is to be incorporated into the eea agreement. (3) directive 2013/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 26 june 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending directive 2002/87/ec and repealing directives 2006/48/ec and 2006/49/ec (3), as corrected by oj l 208, 2.8.2013, p. 73 and oj l 20, 25.1.2017, p. 1, is to be incorporated into the eea agreement. (4) regulation (eu) no 575/2013 and directive 2013/36/eu refer to eu parent institutions, eu parent financial holding companies and eu parent mixed financial holding companies, which in the context of the eea agreement are understood as referring to entities fulfilling the relevant definitions set out in the regulation that are established in an eea contracting party and which are not subsidiaries of any other institution set up in any other eea contracting party. (5) directive 2013/36/eu repeals directives 2006/48/ec (4) and 2006/49/ec (5) of the european parliament and of the council, which are incorporated into the eea agreement and which are consequently to be repealed under the eea agreement. (6) the potential for unwarranted reductions in own funds requirements from the use of internal models has, inter alia, been limited by national legislation implementing article 152 of directive 2006/48/ec, which, by the end of 2017 was replaced by article 500 of regulation (eu) 575/2013. there are, however, still several other provisions in regulation (eu) 575/2013 and directive 2013/36/eu which allow competent authorities to address the same issue, including the possibility for measures to counterbalance unwarranted reductions in the riskweighted exposure amounts, see for instance article 104 of directive 2013/36/eu, and to impose prudent margins of conservatism in the calibration of internal models, see for instance article 144 of regulation (eu) 575/2013 and article 101 of directive 2013/36/eu. (7) annex ix to the eea agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, has adopted this decision: article 1 annex ix to the eea agreement shall be amended as follows: 1. the text of point 14 (directive 2006/48/ec of the european parliament and of the council) is replaced by the following: 32013 l 0036: directive 2013/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 26 june 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending directive 2002/87/ec and repealing directives 2006/48/ec and 2006/49/ec (oj l 176, 27.6.2013, p. 338), as corrected by oj l 208, 2.8.2013, p. 73 and oj l 20, 25.1.2017, p. 1. the provisions of the directive shall, for the purposes of this agreement, be read with the following adaptations: (a) notwithstanding the provisions of protocol 1 to this agreement, and unless otherwise provided for in this agreement, the terms member state(s) and competent authorities shall be understood to include, in addition to their meaning in the directive, the efta states and their competent authorities, respectively. (b) references to escb central banks or to central banks shall be understood to include, in addition to their meaning in the directive, the national central banks of the efta states. (c) references to other acts in the directive shall apply to the extent and in the form that those acts are incorporated into this agreement. (d) references to the powers of eba under article 19 of regulation (eu) no 1093/2010 of the european parliament and of the council in the directive shall be understood as referring, in the cases provided for in and in accordance with point 31g of this annex, to the powers of the efta surveillance authority as regards the efta states. (e) in article 2(5), the following point shall be inserted: (11a) in iceland, the bygg astofnun , the b al nasj ur and the l nasj ur sveitarf laga ohf. ; (f) in article 6, the following subparagraph is added to point (a): the competent authorities of the efta states cooperate with trust and full mutual respect, in particular when ensuring the flow of appropriate and reliable information between them and the parties to the esfs and with the efta surveillance authority. competent authorities of the eu member states shall cooperate with the competent authorities of the efta states in the same manner. (g) article 47(3) shall not apply as regards the efta states. an efta state may, through agreements concluded with one or more third countries, agree to apply provisions which accord to branches of a credit institution having its head office in a third country identical treatment on the territory of that efta state. the contracting parties shall inform and consult each other prior to concluding agreements with third countries on the basis of article 47(3) or the first paragraph of this point, as the case may be. whenever the european union negotiates with one or more third countries towards the conclusion of an agreement on the basis of article 47(3), and such an agreement pertains to obtain national treatment or effective market access for branches of credit institutions having their head office in a member state of the european union in the third countries concerned, the european union shall endeavour to obtain equal treatment for branches of credit institutions having their head office in an efta state. (h) article 48 shall not apply. where an efta state concludes an agreement with one or more third countries regarding the means of exercising supervision on a consolidated basis over institutions the parent undertakings of which have their head offices in a third country and institutions situated in third countries the parent undertakings of which, whether institutions, financial holding companies or mixed financial holding companies, have their head offices in that efta state, that agreement shall seek to ensure that eba is able to obtain from the competent authority of that efta state the information received from national authorities of third countries in accordance with article 35 of regulation (eu) no 1093/2010. (i) in article 53(2), the words or, as the case may be, the efta surveillance authority shall be inserted before the words in accordance with this directive . (j) in article 58(1)(d), the words or, as the case may be, the efta surveillance authority shall be inserted after the word esma . (k) in article 89(5), the words future union legislative acts for disclosure obligations shall be replaced by the words future legislative acts applicable pursuant to the eea agreement provide for disclosure obligations that . (l) in article 114(1), as regards liechtenstein, the words an escb central bank shall be replaced by the words the competent authority . (m) in the second subparagraph of article 117(1), the words or the efta surveillance authority, as the case may be, shall be inserted after the word eba . (n) in article 133(14) and (15), the words or, as regards the efta states, the standing committee of the efta states shall be inserted after the words the commission . (o) in article 151(1), as regards the efta states, the words a decision of the eea joint committee containing shall be inserted after the words in accordance with . 2. the following is inserted after point 14 (directive 2013/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council): 14a. 32013 r 0575: regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council of 26 june 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending regulation (eu) no 648/2012 (oj l 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1), as corrected by oj l 208, 2.8.2013, p. 68, oj l 321, 30.11.2013, p. 6 and oj l 20, 25.1.2017, p. 2, as amended by: 32017 r 2395: regulation (eu) 2017/2395 of the european parliament and of the council of 12 december 2017 (oj l 345, 27.12.2017, p. 27). the provisions of the regulation shall, for the purposes of this agreement, be read with the following adaptations: (a) notwithstanding the provisions of protocol 1 to this agreement, and unless otherwise provided for in this agreement, the terms member state(s) and competent authorities shall be understood to include, in addition to their meaning in the regulation, the efta states and their competent authorities, respectively. (b) references to escb central banks or to central banks shall be understood to include, in addition to their meaning in the regulation, the national central banks of the efta states (c) references to other acts in the regulation shall apply to the extent and in the form that those acts are incorporated into this agreement. (d) references to the powers of eba under article 19 of regulation (eu) no 1093/2010 of the european parliament and of the council in the regulation shall be understood as referring, in the cases provided for in and in accordance with point 31g of this annex, to the powers of the efta surveillance authority as regards the efta states. (e) in point (75) of article 4(1), the words norway and shall be inserted before the word sweden . (f) in article 31(1)(b), as regards the efta states, the words the commission shall read the efta surveillance authority . (g) in paragraphs 1 and 2 of article 80, the words or, in case an efta state is concerned, the efta surveillance authority shall be inserted after the words the commission . (h) in articles 329(4), 344(2), 352(6), 358(4) and 416(5), as regards the efta states, the words the decisions of the eea joint committee containing shall be inserted after the words entry into force of . (i) in article 395: (i) in paragraphs 7 and 8, as regards the efta states, the words the council, shall not apply; (ii) as regards the efta states, the first subparagraph of paragraph 8 shall read as follows: the power to adopt a decision to accept or reject the proposed national measure referred to in paragraph 7 is conferred on the standing committee of the efta states. (iii) the first sentence of the second subparagraph of paragraph 8 shall be replaced by the following: within one month of receiving the notification referred to in paragraph 7, eba shall provide its opinion on the points mentioned in that paragraph to the council, the commission and the member state concerned or, where its opinion concerns national measures proposed by an efta state, to the standing committee of the efta states and the efta state concerned. (j) in article 458: (i) as regards the efta states, the first subparagraph of paragraph 2 shall read as follows: where the authority determined in accordance with paragraph 1 identifies changes in the intensity of macroprudential or systemic risk in the financial system with the potential to have serious negative consequences to the financial system and the real economy in a specific efta state and which that authority considers would better be addressed by means of stricter national measures, it shall notify the standing committee of the efta states, the efta surveillance authority, the esrb and eba of that fact and submit relevant quantitative or qualitative evidence of all of the following: (ii) as regards the efta states, the first subparagraph of paragraph 4 shall read as follows: the power to adopt an implementing act to reject the draft national measures referred to in point (d) of paragraph 2 is conferred on the standing committee of the efta states, acting on a proposal from the efta surveillance authority. ; (iii) in the second subparagraph of paragraph 4, the following shall be added: where their opinions concern draft national measures of an efta state, the esrb and eba shall provide their opinions to the standing committee of the efta states, the efta surveillance authority and the efta state concerned. ; (iv) as regards the efta states, the third to eighth subparagraphs of paragraph 4 shall read as follows: taking utmost account of the opinions referred to in the second subparagraph and if there is robust, strong and detailed evidence that the measure will have a negative impact on the internal market that outweighs the financial stability benefits resulting in a reduction of the macroprudential or systemic risk identified, the efta surveillance authority may, within one month, propose to the standing committee of the efta states to reject the draft national measures. in the absence of an efta surveillance authority proposal within that period of one month, the efta state concerned may immediately adopt the draft national measures for a period of up to two years or until the macroprudential or systemic risk ceases to exist if that occurs sooner. the standing committee of the efta states shall decide on the proposal by the efta surveillance authority within one month after receipt of the proposal and state its reasons for rejecting or not rejecting the draft national measures. the standing committee of the efta states shall only reject the draft national measures if it considers that one or more of the following conditions are not complied with: (a) the changes in the intensity of macroprudential or systemic risk are of such nature as to pose risk to financial stability at national level; (b) articles 124 and 164 of this regulation and articles 101, 103, 104, 105, 133, and 136 of directive 2013/36/eu cannot adequately address the macroprudential or systemic risk identified, taking into account the relative effectiveness of those measures; (c) the draft national measures are more suitable to address the identified macroprudential or systemic risk and do not entail disproportionate adverse effects on the whole or parts of the financial system in other contracting parties or in the eea as a whole, thus forming or creating an obstacle to the functioning of the internal market; (d) the issue concerns only one efta state; and (e) the risks have not already been addressed by other measures in this regulation or in directive 2013/36/eu. the assessment of the standing committee of the efta states shall take into account the opinion of the esrb and eba and shall be based on the evidence presented in accordance with paragraph 2 by the authority determined in accordance with paragraph 1. in the absence of a decision of the standing committee of the efta states to reject the draft national measures within one month after receipt of the proposal by the efta surveillance authority, the efta state may adopt the measures and apply them for a period of up to two years or until the macroprudential or systemic risk ceases to exist if that occurs sooner. (v) as regards the efta states, paragraph 6 shall read as follows: where an efta state recognises the measures set in accordance with this article, it shall notify the standing committee of the efta states, the efta surveillance authority, eba, the esrb and the contracting party to the eea agreement authorised to apply the measures. (k) in article 467(2), as regards the efta states, the words the commission has adopted a regulation shall read the entry into force of a decision of the eea joint committee containing a regulation adopted . (l) in article 497, as regards the efta states: (i) in paragraphs 1 and 2, the words the decisions of the eea joint committee containing shall be inserted after the words entry into force of the latest of ; (ii) in paragraph 1, the words have been adopted shall read apply in the eea . 3. in point 31bc (regulation (eu) no 648/2012 of the european parliament and of the council): (a) the following indent is added: 32013 r 0575: regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council of 26 june 2013 (oj l 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1), as corrected by oj l 208, 2.8.2013, p. 68, oj l 321, 30.11.2013, p. 6 and oj l 20, 25.1.2017, p. 2. (b) in adaptation (zh), the following is added: (v) in paragraph 5a, as regards the efta states, the words the decisions of the eea joint committee containing shall be inserted after the words entry into force of the latest of . 4. the following indent is added in point 31ea (directive 2002/87/ec of the european parliament and of the council): 32013 l 0036: directive 2013/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 26 june 2013 (oj l 176, 27.6.2013, p. 338), as corrected by oj l 208, 2.8.2013, p. 73 and oj l 20, 25.1.2017, p. 1. 5. the text of point 31 (directive 2006/49/ec of the european parliament and of the council) is deleted. article 2 the texts of regulations (eu) no 575/2013, as corrected by oj l 208, 2.8.2013, p. 68, oj l 321, 30.11.2013, p. 6 and oj l 20, 25.1.2017, p. 2, and (eu) 2017/2395 and directive 2013/36/eu, as corrected by oj l 208, 2.8.2013, p. 73 and oj l 20, 25.1.2017, p. 1, in the icelandic and norwegian languages, to be published in the eea supplement to the official journal of the european union, shall be authentic. article 3 this decision shall enter into force on [ ], provided that all the notifications under article 103(1) of the eea agreement have been made (*1). article 4 this decision shall be published in the eea section of, and in the eea supplement to, the official journal of the european union. done at brussels, for the eea joint committee the president the secretaries to the eea joint committee (1) oj l 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1. (2) oj l 345, 27.12.2017, p. 27. (3) oj l 176, 27.6.2013, p. 338. (4) oj l 177, 30.6.2006, p. 1. (5) oj l 177, 30.6.2006, p. 201. (*1) [no constitutional requirements indicated.] [constitutional requirements indicated.] joint declaration by the contracting parties to decision no /2019 incorporating directive 2013/36/eu into the eea agreement the contracting parties share the understanding that the incorporation into the eea agreement of directive 2013/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 26 june 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending directive 2002/87/ec and repealing directives 2006/48/ec and 2006/49/ec is without prejudice to national rules of general application concerning the screening for security or public order of foreign direct investment.

name: european council decision (eu) 2019/476 taken in agreement with the united kingdom of 22 march 2019 extending the period under article 50(3)teu type: decision subject matter: europe; european construction date published: 2019-03-22 22.3.2019 en official journal of the european union li 80/1 european council decision (eu) 2019/476 taken in agreement with the united kingdom of 22 march 2019 extending the period under article 50(3)teu the european council, having regard to the treaty on european union, and in particular article 50(3) thereof, whereas: (1) on 29 march 2017, the united kingdom notified the european council of its intention to withdraw from the european union and the european atomic energy community (euratom) in accordance with article 50 treaty on the european union, which applies to euratom by virtue of article 106a of the treaty establishing the european atomic energy community. (2) on 22 may 2017, the council authorised the commission to open negotiations with the united kingdom for an agreement setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal, taking account of the framework for its future relationship with the union. (3) the negotiations were conducted in the light of the guidelines of 29 april and 15 december 2017 and of 23 march 2018 provided by the european council with the overall objective of ensuring an orderly withdrawal of the united kingdom from the union and euratom. (4) on 14 november 2018, the president of the european commission sent to the president of the european council the draft agreement on the withdrawal of the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland from the european union and the european atomic energy community (withdrawal agreement), for which the government of the united kingdom had signalled its approval. on 22 november 2018, the president of the european commission submitted to the president of the european council the draft political declaration setting out the framework for the future relationship between the european union and the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland (political declaration), agreed at negotiators' level and agreed in principle at political level, subject to the endorsement of the leaders. (5) on 25 november 2018, the european council endorsed the withdrawal agreement and approved the political declaration. (6) on 11 march 2019, the president of the european commission sent to the president of the european council the instrument relating to the withdrawal agreement and the joint statement supplementing the political declaration, agreed between prime minister may and the president of the european commission juncker and endorsed by the european commission on the same day. on 21 march 2019, the european council approved both documents. (7) according to article 50(3) teu, the treaties are to cease to apply to the withdrawing state from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification, unless the european council, in agreement with the member state concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period. (8) by letter of 20 march 2019, the united kingdom submitted a request for an extension of the period provided for in article 50(3) teu until 30 june 2019, with a view to finalising the ratification of the withdrawal agreement. (9) on 21 march 2019, the european council agreed to an extension until 22 may 2019, provided the withdrawal agreement is approved by the house of commons in the following week. if that is not the case, the european council agreed to an extension until 12 april 2019 and indicated that it expected the united kingdom to indicate a way forward before 12 april 2019 for its consideration. (10) this extension will have the consequence that the united kingdom will remain a member state with all the rights and obligations set out in the treaties and under union law. if the united kingdom is still a member state on 23-26 may 2019, it will be under the obligation to hold the elections to the european parliament in accordance with union law. it is to be noted that the united kingdom would have to give notice of the poll by 12 april 2019 in order to hold such elections. (11) such an extension excludes any re-opening of the withdrawal agreement. any unilateral commitment, statement or other act by the united kingdom should be compatible with the letter and the spirit of the withdrawal agreement. (12) as provided for in article 50(4) teu, the united kingdom has not taken part in the discussions of the european council concerning this decision nor in its adoption. however, as set out in the letter from the permanent representative of the uk to the european union, sir tim barrow, of 22 march 2019, it has agreed, in accordance with article 50(3) teu, to the extension of the period referred to in that article and to this decision, has adopted this decision: article 1 in the event that the withdrawal agreement is approved by the house of commons by 29 march 2019 at the latest, the period provided for in article 50(3) teu is extended until 22 may 2019. in the event that the withdrawal agreement is not approved by the house of commons by 29 march 2019 at the latest, the period provided for in article 50(3) teu is extended until 12 april 2019. in that event, the united kingdom will indicate a way forward before 12 april 2019, for consideration by the european council. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption. done at brussels, 22 march 2019. for the european council the president d. tusk

name: council decision (cfsp) 2019/468 of 21 march 2019 amending decision 2011/172/cfsp concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in egypt type: decision subject matter: africa; international affairs; civil law; european construction date published: 2019-03-22 22.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 80/40 council decision (cfsp) 2019/468 of 21 march 2019 amending decision 2011/172/cfsp concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in egypt the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on european union, and in particular article 29 thereof, having regard to the proposal from the high representative of the union for foreign affairs and security policy, whereas: (1) on 21 march 2011, the council adopted decision 2011/172/cfsp (1) concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in egypt. (2) on the basis of a review of decision 2011/172/cfsp, those restrictive measures should be renewed until 22 march 2020 and the annex should be supplemented with information regarding the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection. (3) decision 2011/172/cfsp should therefore be amended accordingly, has adopted this decision: article 1 decision 2011/172/cfsp is amended as follows: (1) in article 5, the second paragraph is replaced by the following: this decision shall apply until 22 march 2020.; (2) the annex is amended as set out in the annex to this decision. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at brussels, 21 march 2019. for the council the president g. ciamba (1) council decision 2011/172/cfsp of 21 march 2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in egypt (oj l 76, 22.3.2011, p. 63). annex the annex to decision 2011/172/cfsp is replaced by the following: annex a. list of natural and legal persons, entities and bodies referred to in article 1 name (and any aliases) identifying information grounds for designation 1. mohamed hosni elsayed mubarak former president of the arab republic of egypt date of birth: 4.5.1928 male person subject to judicial proceedings or an asset recovery process by the egyptian authorities following a final court ruling in respect of the misappropriation of state funds on the basis of the united nations convention against corruption. 2. suzanne saleh thabet spouse of mr mohamed hosni elsayed mubarak, former president of the arab republic of egypt date of birth: 28.2.1941 female associated with mohamed hosni elsayed mubarak, who is subject to judicial proceedings or an asset recovery process by the egyptian authorities following a final court ruling in respect of the misappropriation of state funds on the basis of the united nations convention against corruption. 3. alaa mohamed hosni elsayed mubarak son of mr. mohamed hosni elsayed mubarak, former president of the arab republic of egypt date of birth: 26.11.1960 male person subject to judicial proceedings or an asset recovery process by the egyptian authorities following a final court ruling in respect of the misappropriation of state funds on the basis of the united nations convention against corruption. 4. heidy mahmoud magdy hussein rasekh spouse of mr alaa mohamed elsayed mubarak, son of former president of the arab republic of egypt date of birth: 5.10.1971 female person subject to judicial proceedings or an asset recovery process by the egyptian authorities following a final court ruling in respect of the misappropriation of state funds on the basis of the united nations convention against corruption, and associated with alaa mohamed hosni elsayed mubarak. 5. gamal mohamed hosni elsayed mubarak son of mr. mohamed hosni elsayed mubarak, former president of the arab republic of egypt date of birth: 28.12.1963 male person subject to judicial proceedings or an asset recovery process by the egyptian authorities following a final court ruling in respect of the misappropriation of state funds on the basis of the united nations convention against corruption. 6. khadiga mahmoud el gammal spouse of mr gamal mahamed hosni elsayed mubarak, son of former president of the arab republic of egypt date of birth: 13.10.1982 female person subject to judicial proceedings or an asset recovery process by the egyptian authorities following a final court ruling in respect of the misappropriation of state funds on the basis of the united nations convention against corruption, and associated with gamal mohamed hosni elsayed mubarak. 15. mohamed zohir mohamed wahed garrana former minister of tourism date of birth: 20.2.1959 male person subject to judicial proceedings by the egyptian authorities in respect of the misappropriation of state funds on the basis of the united nations convention against corruption. 18. habib ibrahim habib eladli former minister of interior date of birth: 1.3.1938 male person subject to judicial proceedings by the egyptian authorities in respect of the misappropriation of state funds on the basis of the united nations convention against corruption. 19. elham sayed salem sharshar spouse of mr habib ibrahim eladli date of birth: 23.1.1963 female person subject to judicial proceedings in respect of the misappropriation of state funds on the basis of the united nations convention against corruption, and associated with habib ibrahim eladli. b. rights of defence and right to effective judicial protection under egyptian law: the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection it follows from articles 54, 97 and 98 of the egypt constitution, articles 77, 78, 124, 199, 214, 271, 272 and 277 of the egypt criminal procedures act and articles 93 and 94 of the egypt advocacy act (law no 17 of 1983) that the following rights are guaranteed under egyptian law: to any individual suspected of or charged with a criminal offence: 1. the right to judicial review of any act or administrative decision; 2. the right to defend himself/herself in person or through legal assistance of his/her own choosing or, if he/she has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require; to any individual charged with a criminal offence: 1. the right to be informed promptly, in a language which he/she understands and in detail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against him/her; 2. the right to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of his/her defence; 3. the right to examine or have examined witnesses against him/her and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his/her behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him/her; 4. the right to have the free assistance of an interpreter if he/she cannot understand or speak the language used in court. application of the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection 1. mohamed hosni elsayed mubarak the information on the council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of mr mubarak were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the council relied. this is demonstrated in particular as follows: first case on 27 june 2013, mr mubarak was charged together with two other individuals with misappropriation of public funds and proceedings were initiated before the cairo criminal court on 17 november 2013. on 21 may 2014, that court convicted the three defendants. the defendants challenged this judgment before the court of cassation. on 13 january 2015, the court of cassation quashed the verdict and ordered a retrial. on retrial, on 4 and 29 april 2015, verbal and written pleadings of the parties were presented. on 9 may 2015, the cairo criminal court convicted the defendants, ordered the restitution of the misappropriated funds and ordered the payment of a fine. on 24 may 2015, an appeal was lodged with the court of cassation. on 9 january 2016, the court of cassation upheld the convictions. on 8 march 2016, the defendants reached a settlement within the experts committee set up by prime ministerial decree no 2873 of 2015. that settlement was approved by the cabinet of ministers on 9 march 2016. that settlement was not submitted to the court of cassation for final approval by the prosecutor general because the experts committee was not the competent committee. it is open to the defendants to submit a request for settlement to the competent committee, the national committee for recovery of assets located abroad (ncraa). second case the investigation relating to facts of misappropriation of public funds or assets is still ongoing. the council has found no indication that the rights of defence or the right to effective judicial protection of mr mubarak were not respected. 3. alaa mohamed hosni elsayed mubarak the information on the council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of mr alaa mubarak were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the council relied. this is demonstrated in particular as follows: freezing order on 28 february 2011, the prosecutor general issued an order prohibiting mr alaa mubarak and other individuals from disposing of their assets and funds in accordance with article 208 bis/a of the egypt criminal procedures act, which allows the prosecutor general to prohibit the defendant, his wife and his children from disposing of their assets if there are any doubts that such assets are the illegal proceeds of the crimes committed by that defendant. on 8 march 2011, the competent criminal court upheld the prohibition order. pursuant to the laws of the arab republic of egypt, defendants have the right to challenge the court ruling on the prohibition order before the same court. mr alaa mubarak has not challenged the ruling of 8 march 2011. first case the defendant was referred together with another individual to the trial court (cairo criminal court) on 30 may 2012. on 6 june 2013, the court returned the case to the public prosecution for further investigations. after the conclusion of the investigations, the case was referred again to the court. on 15 september 2018, the cairo criminal court delivered a judgment by which: (i) it requested the expert committee it had appointed to complement the expert report it had submitted to the court in july 2018; (ii) ordered the arrest of the defendants; and (iii) asked to refer the defendants to the national committee for recovery of assets located abroad (ncraa) with a view to a possible reconciliation. the defendants successfully challenged the order of arrest and, following a motion of recusal of the judicial panel, the case was referred to another circuit of the criminal court to review the merits. second case on 27 june 2013, mr alaa mubarak was charged together with two other individuals with misappropriation of public funds and proceedings were initiated before the cairo criminal court on 17 november 2013. on 21 may 2014, that court convicted the three defendants. the defendants challenged this judgment before the court of cassation. on 13 january 2015, the court of cassation quashed the verdict and ordered a retrial. on retrial, on 4 and 29 april 2015, verbal and written pleadings of the parties were presented. on 9 may 2015, the cairo criminal court convicted the defendants, ordered the restitution of the misappropriated funds and ordered the payment of a fine. on 24 may 2015, an appeal was lodged with the court of cassation. on 9 january 2016, the court of cassation upheld the convictions. on 8 march 2016, the defendants reached a settlement within the experts committee set up by prime ministerial decree no 2873 of 2015. this settlement was approved by the cabinet of ministers on 9 march 2016. this settlement was not submitted to the court of cassation for final approval by the prosecutor general because the experts committee was not the competent committee. it is open to the defendants to submit a request for settlement to the competent committee, the national committee for recovery of assets located abroad (ncraa). third case the investigation relating to facts of misappropriation of public funds or assets is still ongoing. the council has found no indication that the rights of the defence or the right to effective judicial protection of mr alaa mubarak were not respected. 4. heidy mahmoud magdy hussein rasekh the information on the council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of ms rasekh were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the council relied. this is demonstrated in particular as follows: freezing order on 28 february 2011, the prosecutor general issued an order prohibiting ms rasekh and other individuals from disposing of their assets and funds in accordance with article 208 bis/a of the egypt criminal procedures act, which allows the prosecutor general to prohibit the defendant, his wife and his children from disposing of their assets if there are any doubts that such assets are the illegal proceeds of the crimes committed by that defendant. on 8 march 2011, the competent criminal court upheld the prohibition order. pursuant to the laws of the arab republic of egypt, defendants have the right to challenge the court ruling on the prohibition order before the same court. ms rasekh has not challenged the ruling of 8 march 2011. case the investigation relating to facts of misappropriation of public funds or assets is still ongoing the council has found no indication that the rights of the defence or the right to effective judicial protection of ms rasekh were not respected. 5. gamal mohamed hosni elsayed mubarak the information on the council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of mr gamal mubarak were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the council relied. this is demonstrated in particular as follows: freezing order on 28 february 2011, the prosecutor general issued an order prohibiting mr gamal mubarak and other individuals from disposing of their assets and funds in accordance with article 208 bis/a of the egypt criminal procedures act, which allows the prosecutor general to prohibit the defendant, his wife and his children from disposing of their assets if there are any doubts that such assets are the illegal proceeds of the crimes committed by that defendant. on 8 march 2011, the competent criminal court upheld the prohibition order. pursuant to the laws of the arab republic of egypt, defendants have the right to challenge the court ruling on the prohibition order before the same court. mr gamal mubarak has not challenged the ruling of 8 march 2011. first case mr gamal mubarak and another individual were referred to the trial court (cairo criminal court) on 30 may 2012. on 6 june 2013, the court returned the case to the public prosecution for further investigations. after the conclusion of the investigations, the case was referred again to the court. on 15 september 2018, the cairo criminal court delivered a judgment by which: (i) it requested the expert committee it had appointed to complement the expert report it had submitted to the court in july 2018; (ii) ordered the arrest of the defendants; and (iii) asked to refer the defendants to the national committee for recovery of assets located abroad (ncraa) with a view to a possible reconciliation. the defendants successfully challenged the order of arrest and, following a motion of recusal of the judicial panel, the case was referred to another circuit of the criminal court to review the merits. second case on 27 june 2013, mr gamal mubarak was charged together with two other individuals with misappropriation of public funds and proceedings were initiated before the cairo criminal court on 17 november 2013. on 21 may 2014, that court convicted the three defendants. the defendants challenged this judgment before the court of cassation. on 13 january 2015, the court of cassation quashed the verdict and ordered a retrial. on retrial, on 4 and 29 april 2015, verbal and written pleadings of the parties were presented. on 9 may 2015, the cairo criminal court convicted the defendants, ordered the restitution of the misappropriated funds and ordered the payment of a fine. on 24 may 2015, an appeal was lodged with the court of cassation. on 9 january 2016, the court of cassation upheld the convictions. on 8 march 2016, the defendants reached a settlement within the experts committee set up by prime ministerial decree no 2873 of 2015. this settlement was approved by the cabinet of ministers on 9 march 2016. this settlement was not submitted to the court of cassation for final approval by the prosecutor general because the experts committee was not the competent committee. it is open to the defendants to submit a request for settlement to the competent committee, the national committee for recovery of assets located abroad (ncraa). third case the investigation relating to facts of misappropriation of public funds or assets is still ongoing. in the course of the investigation proceedings mr gamal mubarak has been questioned. the council has found no indication that the rights of the defence or the right to effective judicial protection of mr gamal mubarak were not respected. 6. khadiga mahmoud el gammal the information on the council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of ms el gammal were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the council relied. this is demonstrated in particular as follows: freezing order on 28 february 2011, the prosecutor general issued an order prohibiting ms khadiga el gammal and other individuals from disposing of their assets and funds in accordance with article 208 bis/a of the egypt criminal procedures act, which allows the prosecutor general to prohibit the defendant, his wife and his children from disposing of their assets if there are any doubts that such assets are the illegal proceeds of the crimes committed by that defendant. on 8 march 2011, the competent criminal court upheld the prohibition order. pursuant to the laws of the arab republic of egypt, defendants have the right to challenge the court ruling on the prohibition order before the same court. ms el gammal has not challenged the ruling of 8 march 2011. case the investigation relating to facts of misappropriation of public funds or assets is still ongoing. the council has found no indication that the rights of defence or the right to effective judicial protection of ms el gammal were not respected. 15. mohamed zohir mohamed wahed garrana the information on the council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of mr garrana were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the council relied. this is demonstrated in particular as follows: case the investigation relating to facts of misappropriation of public funds or assets is still ongoing. the council has found no indication that the rights of defence or the right to effective judicial protection of mr garrana were not respected. 18. habib ibrahim habib eladli the information on the council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of mr eladli were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the council relied. this is demonstrated in particular as follows: case mr eladli was referred by the investigating judge to the competent trial court on charges of misappropriation of public funds. on 7 february 2016, that court decided that the assets of mr eladli, his spouse and minor son should be frozen. pursuant to that court decision the prosecutor general issued a freezing order on 10 february 2016 in accordance with article 208 bis/a of the egypt criminal procedures act, which allows the prosecutor general to prohibit the defendant, his wife and his children from disposing of their assets if there are any doubts that such assets are the illegal proceeds of the crimes committed by that defendant. pursuant to the laws of the arab republic of egypt, defendants have the right to challenge the court ruling on the prohibition order before the same court. on 15 april 2017, the court convicted the defendant. the defendant challenged this judgment before the court of cassation, which quashed the verdict on 11 january 2018 and ordered a retrial. the new trial is still ongoing. 19. elham sayed salem sharshar the information on the council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of ms sharshar were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the council relied. this is demonstrated in particular as follows: freezing order the husband of ms sharshar was referred by the investigating judge to the competent trial court on charges of misappropriation of public funds. on 7 february 2016, that court decided that the assets of her husband, her own and those of their minor son should be frozen. pursuant to that court decision the prosecutor general issued a freezing order on 10 february 2016 in accordance with article 208 bis/a of the egypt criminal procedures act, which allows the prosecutor general to prohibit the defendant, his wife and his children from disposing of their assets if there are any doubts that such assets are the illegal proceeds of the crimes committed by that defendant. pursuant to the laws of the arab republic of egypt, defendants have the right to challenge the court ruling on the prohibition order before the same court. ms sharshar has not challenged the court ruling. .

name: council decision (eu) 2019/458 of 19 march 2019 amending decision 1999/70/ec concerning the external auditors of the national central banks, as regards the external auditors of banque centrale du luxembourg type: decision subject matter: accounting; monetary relations; europe; monetary economics date published: 2019-03-21 21.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 79/17 council decision (eu) 2019/458 of 19 march 2019 amending decision 1999/70/ec concerning the external auditors of the national central banks, as regards the external auditors of banque centrale du luxembourg the council of the european union, having regard to protocol no 4 on the statute of the european system of central banks and of the european central bank, annexed to the treaty on european union and the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 27.1 thereof, having regard to the recommendation of the european central bank of 14 february 2019 to the council of the european union on the external auditors of banque centrale du luxembourg (ecb/2019/6) (1), whereas: (1) the accounts of the european central bank (ecb) and of the national central banks of the member states whose currency is the euro are to be audited by independent external auditors recommended by the governing council of the ecb and approved by the council of the european union. (2) the mandate of banque centrale du luxembourg's current external auditors, deloitte audit sarl, expired after the audit for the financial year 2018. it is therefore necessary to appoint external auditors from the financial year 2019. (3) banque centrale du luxembourg has selected ernst & young sa as its external auditors for the financial years 2019 to 2023. (4) the governing council of the ecb recommended that ernst & young sa be appointed as the external auditors of banque centrale du luxembourg for the financial years 2019 to 2023. (5) following the recommendation of the governing council of the ecb, council decision 1999/70/ec (2) should be amended accordingly, has adopted this decision: article 1 in article 1 of decision 1999/70/ec, paragraph 7 is replaced by the following: 7. ernst & young sa are hereby approved as the external auditors of banque centrale du luxembourg for the financial years 2019 to 2023. article 2 this decision shall take effect on the date of its notification. article 3 this decision is addressed to the ecb. done at brussels, 19 march 2019. for the council the president g. ciamba (1) oj c 67, 20.2.2019, p. 1. (2) council decision 1999/70/ec of 25 january 1999 concerning the external auditors of the national central banks (oj l 22, 29.1.1999, p. 69).

name: council decision (eu) 2019/457 of 19 march 2019 appointing a member, proposed by the kingdom of spain, of the committee of the regions type: decision subject matter: europe; eu institutions and european civil service date published: 2019-03-21 21.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 79/16 council decision (eu) 2019/457 of 19 march 2019 appointing a member, proposed by the kingdom of spain, of the committee of the regions the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 305 thereof, having regard to the proposal of the spanish government, whereas: (1) on 26 january 2015, 5 february 2015 and 23 june 2015, the council adopted decisions (eu) 2015/116 (1), (eu) 2015/190 (2) and (eu) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the committee of the regions for the period from 26 january 2015 to 25 january 2020. (2) a member's seat on the committee of the regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of ms susana d az pacheco, has adopted this decision: article 1 the following is hereby appointed as a member of the committee of the regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 january 2020: mr juan manuel moreno bonilla, presidente de la junta de andaluc a. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at brussels, 19 march 2019. for the council the president g. ciamba (1) council decision (eu) 2015/116 of 26 january 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the committee of the regions for the period from 26 january 2015 to 25 january 2020 (oj l 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42). (2) council decision (eu) 2015/190 of 5 february 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the committee of the regions for the period from 26 january 2015 to 25 january 2020 (oj l 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25). (3) council decision (eu) 2015/994 of 23 june 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the committee of the regions for the period from 26 january 2015 to 25 january 2020 (oj l 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70).

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/450 of 19 march 2019 on publication of the european assessment documents (eads) for construction products drafted in support of regulation (eu) no 305/2011 of the european parliament and of the council (text with eea relevance.) type: decision_impl subject matter: building and public works; technology and technical regulations; marketing date published: 2019-03-20 20.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 77/78 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/450 of 19 march 2019 on publication of the european assessment documents (eads) for construction products drafted in support of regulation (eu) no 305/2011 of the european parliament and of the council (text with eea relevance) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to regulation (eu) no 305/2011 of the european parliament and of the council of 9 march 2011 laying down harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products and repealing council directive 89/106/eec (1), and in particular article 22 thereof, whereas: (1) in accordance with regulation (eu) no 305/2011, technical assessment bodies are to use methods and criteria provided in european assessment documents, the references of which have been published in the official journal of the european union, for assessing performance of construction products covered by those documents in relation to their essential characteristics. (2) in accordance with article 19 of regulation (eu) no 305/2011, following several requests by manufacturers for european technical assessments, the organisation of technical assessment bodies drew up and adopted several european assessment documents. (3) the commission has assessed whether the european assessment documents drafted by the organisation of technical assessment bodies satisfy the demands to be met in relation to the basic requirements for construction works set out in annex i to regulation (eu) no 305/2011. (4) the european assessment documents drafted by the organisation of technical assessment bodies satisfy the demands to be met in relation to the basic requirements for construction works set out in the annex to regulation (eu) no 305/2011. it is therefore appropriate to publish the references of those european assessment documents in the official journal of the european union, has adopted this decision: article 1 the references of the european assessment documents for construction products drafted in support of regulation (eu) no 305/2011 that are listed in annex to this decision are hereby published in the official journal of the european union. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at brussels, 19 march 2019. for the commission the president jean-claude juncker (1) oj l 88, 4.4.2011, p. 5. annex reference and title of the european assessment document 040427-00-0404 kits for external thermal insulation composite system (etics) with mortar as thermal insulation product and renderings or discontinuous claddings as exterior skin 060012-00-0802 kit consisting of chimney flue liner, made of glass fibres, mineral and organic substances, and ancillaries 090119-00-0404 kits for external wall cladding of mineral boards with renderings applied in situ 090120-00-0404 kits for non-load bearing mineral board external wall systems 130031-00-0304 metal web beams and columns 130082-00-0603 fa ade fixing system - plastic bracket for fixing timber or wood based elements to the substructure 260014-00-0301 calcined layer silicate based type ii addition

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/449 of 18 march 2019 amending commission implementing decision (eu) 2016/715 setting out measures in respect of certain fruits originating in certain third countries to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the union of the harmful organism phyllosticta citricarpa (mcalpine) van der aa (notified under document c(2019) 2024) type: decision_impl subject matter: trade; plant product; international trade; cooperation policy; agricultural activity; trade policy; agricultural policy date published: 2019-03-20 20.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 77/76 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/449 of 18 march 2019 amending commission implementing decision (eu) 2016/715 setting out measures in respect of certain fruits originating in certain third countries to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the union of the harmful organism phyllosticta citricarpa (mcalpine) van der aa (notified under document c(2019) 2024) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to council directive 2000/29/ec of 8 may 2000 on protective measures against the introduction into the community of organisms harmful to plants or plant products and against their spread within the community (1), and in particular the fourth sentence of article 16(3) thereof, whereas: (1) commission implementing decision (eu) 2016/715 (2) lays down measures in respect of fruits of citrus l., fortunella swingle, poncirus raf., and their hybrids, other than fruits of citrus aurantium l. and citrus latifolia tanaka (the specified fruits), originating in argentina, brazil, south africa and uruguay to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the union of phyllosticta citricarpa (the specified organism). (2) the increase in the number of import interceptions in the last three years shows that the measures provided for by implementing decision (eu) 2016/715 remain necessary for the protection of the union territory from the specified organism. (3) furthermore, a significant number of interceptions of the specified organism has been notified in 2018 by member states, as a result of their import inspections of the specified fruits originating in brazil. the requirements for the introduction into the union of those fruits originating in brazil should therefore be strengthened. (4) to ensure the specified fruits originating in brazil are free from the specified organism, they should be subject to the same import inspection requirements as the fruits originating in argentina, south africa and uruguay. (5) as the specified fruits originating in brazil will have to be subjected to treatments against the specified organism, the requirement for detailed information on the pre- and post-harvest treatments should also become applicable to those fruits for traceability purposes. (6) implementing decision (eu) 2016/715 should therefore be amended accordingly. (7) the measures provided for in this decision are in accordance with the opinion of the standing committee on plants, animals, food and feed, has adopted this decision: article 1 amendments to implementing decision (eu) 2016/715 implementing decision (eu) 2016/715 is amended as follows: (1) article 4 is deleted; (2) article 5a is amended as follows: (a) the title is replaced by the following: introduction into the union of specified fruits originating in argentina and brazil; (b) the introductory phrase is replaced by the following: specified fruits originating in argentina and brazil shall be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate, as referred to in the first subparagraph of point (ii) of article 13(1) of directive 2000/29/ec, including under the heading additional declaration the following elements: (3) article 6 is amended as follows: (a) the title is replaced by the following: requirements concerning inspection of the specified fruits originating in argentina, brazil, south africa and uruguay within the union; (b) paragraph 1 is replaced by the following: 1. specified fruits originating in argentina, brazil, south africa and uruguay shall be visually inspected at the point of entry or at the place of destination established in accordance with commission directive 2004/103/ec (*1). those inspections shall be carried out on samples of at least 200 fruits of each species of the specified fruits by batch of 30 tonnes, or part thereof, selected on the basis of any possible symptom of phyllosticta citricarpa. (*1) commission directive 2004/103/ec of 7 october 2004 on identity and plant health checks of plants, plant products or other objects, listed in part b of annex v to council directive 2000/29/ec, which may be carried out at a place other than the point of entry into the community or at a place close by and specifying the conditions related to these checks (oj l 313, 12.10.2004, p. 16).;" (4) in article 7, point (c) is replaced by the following: (c) detailed information on the pre- and post-harvest treatments has been kept.; (5) article 22 is replaced by the following: article 22 date of expiration this decision shall expire on 31 march 2022. article 2 addressees this decision is addressed to the member states. done at brussels, 18 march 2019. for the commission vytenis andriukaitis member of the commission (1) oj l 169, 10.7.2000, p. 1. (2) commission implementing decision (eu) 2016/715 of 11 may 2016 setting out measures in respect of certain fruits originating in certain third countries to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the union of the harmful organism phyllosticta citricarpa (mcalpine) van der aa (oj l 125, 13.5.2016, p. 16).

name: commission decision (eu) 2019/422 of 20 september 2018 on the state aid sa 36112 (2016/c) (ex 2015/nn) implemented by italy for the port authority of naples and cantieri del mediterraneo s.p.a. (notified under document c(2018) 6037) (text with eea relevance.) type: decision subject matter: maritime and inland waterway transport; regions of eu member states; production; economic policy; europe; competition; cooperation policy date published: 2019-03-20 20.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 78/63 commission decision (eu) 2019/422 of 20 september 2018 on the state aid sa 36112 (2016/c) (ex 2015/nn) implemented by italy for the port authority of naples and cantieri del mediterraneo s.p.a. (notified under document c(2018) 6037) (only the italian version is authentic) (text with eea relevance) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union (tfeu), and in particular the first subparagraph of article 108(2) thereof, having regard to the agreement on the european economic area, and in particular article 62(1)(a) thereof, having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provision(s) cited above (1) and having regard to their comments, whereas: 1. procedure (1) in march 2006, the commission requested information from the italian authorities on potential state support to cantieri del mediterraneo s.p.a. (camed) concerning planned works on a dry-dock located in the port of naples (dry-dock no 3). following the reply of the italian authorities of 3 april 2006, the commission did not act nor investigate the matter further to the italian comments, and the commission services closed the file internally, as the support was considered not to involve state aid. italy has never formally notified to the commission the measures at stake. (2) on 21 january 2013, a ship repairer active in the port of naples expressed concerns in respect of funding provided by public authorities in italy to three investment projects allegedly carried out between 2006 and 2014 for the refurbishment of three dry-docks (bacini di carenaggio) operated by camed by means of a concession contract. the case was registered as sa.36112 (2013/cp) alleged aid to cantieri del mediterraneo. on 27 june 2013, the complainant provided the commission with additional information. (3) between 28 february 2013 and 12 june 2013 the commission requested information from the italian authorities in the light of the complainant's allegations. (4) on 21 october 2013 the commission services communicated to the complainant their preliminary findings concerning the alleged state aid to camed and informed the complainant that, based on the information available at the time, the alleged measures did not seem to constitute aid within the meaning of article 107(1) tfeu since the presence of an advantage to camed appeared to be excluded. the commission services explained that at that stage there were no indications that operating aid had been granted at the level of the operator, since camed did not appear to be released from costs which it would normally have had to bear in its day-to-day management or normal activities. (5) between 19 november 2013 and 10 february 2015 the complainant submitted further information. in particular, the complainant expressed concerns that the measures represented illegal investment aid to the port authority of naples and illegal operating aid to camed. the commission services requested additional information from the italian authorities on 17 june 2014, 14 november 2014, and 12 march 2015, to which the italian authorities replied on 1 august, 3 and 29 september 2014, 11 february 2015, and 10 june 2015. since the information available showed that the public funding had already been granted, on 4 june 2015 the commission services informed italy that the measures would be registered as unlawful aid (2015/nn) - investment aid to the port authority of naples and cantieri del mediterraneo s.p.a., and the procedural rules applicable would be those laid down in chapter iii of council regulation (ec) no 659/1999 (2). (6) on 21 september 2015, the commission services met the italian authorities and the commission requested additional information on 7 october 2015, to which the italian authorities replied on 9 november 2015. on 11 november 2015 the commission services met the complainant. (7) by letter dated 28 june 2016, the commission informed the italian authorities that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in article 108(2) tfeu in respect of the aid. (8) the commission decision to initiate the procedure (the opening decision) was published in the official journal of the european union (3) on 7 october 2016. the commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the aid/measures. (9) the commission received comments from two interested parties: camed and the complainant. it forwarded them to the italian authorities, which was given the opportunity to react; its comments were received by letter dated 12 january 2017. (10) the commission sent additional questions to italy on 9 and 16 november 2017, to which they replied on 24 november 2017. 2. detailed description of the aid 2.1. background and recipients of aid (11) the port of naples is located in the campania region and is administered by pan. (12) in the port of naples, there are three dry-docks owned by the state (dry-docks nos 1, 2, and 3) and two floating docks owned by two private operators (docks nos 5 and 6). (13) dry-docks nos 1, 2, and 3 are used to provide ship repair activities by camed and in principle any other ship repairer in compliance with regulation for the operation of ship-repairing docks of the port of naples (4) adopted in 2002 and later modified (the 2002 regulation) (5). according to the italian authorities, all dry-docks in the port of naples must be made available to all interested users (e.g. other ship-repairers) on the basis of certain pre-defined and objective rules. (14) the italian authorities explained that, following the decision to withdraw from the port of naples by the fincantieri group one of the largest operators of the shipbuilding sector at that time at the end of the last century, the docks were in a very poor state. at that time, camed (6) was active as a port repairer in the port of naples by virtue of a land concession act valid from 1909 to 2008. according to the italian authorities, camed agreed to invest in the area, provided that pan undertook a number of structural investments on the dry-docks nos 1, 2, and 3. following a request filed by camed in 1999 to pan, the latter agreed to perform works to modernise and make the dry-dock no 3 adequate for use (the 2001 agreement) (7). (15) in 2001 camed requested from pan the authorisation to perform a number of works on the docks in exchange for a 40 years prolongation of the existing land concession (concessione demaniale). following camed's request, pan started the administrative procedure under italian law for the award of a land concession contract (8). pan published in the municipality's register and in its own register camed's request for a land concession together with the business plan for a period of 20 days (from 18 january 2002 until 6 february 2002). the publication invited interested parties to present their observations or alternative proposals. according to the procedure, in case of objections or complaints, the decision on the award of the concession is taken by the competent minister. (16) since pan received no observations following the publication of camed's request, it granted to camed the land concession act (atto di concessione demaniale) no 125 of 29 july 2004 (the 2004 concession) for the operation and use of the three dry-docks, with the obligation to make them available to all interested users (e.g. other ship-repairers) in compliance with the 2002 regulation. camed agreed to terminate the previous land concession valid from 1909. according to the 2004 concession, camed has the right to operate and use the dry-docks for 30 years, starting from 28 july 2003 instead of the requested 40 years, in exchange of a yearly land use fee, calculated on the basis of fixed legal parameters (eur/sqm) and annually adjusted to inflation pursuant to ministerial decree of 15 november 1995. the land use fee paid over the period 2004-2017 is presented in table 1. table 1 concession fees (in eur) year yearly concession fee 2004 124 117 2005 103 300 2006 139 900 2007 147 800 2008 146 341 2009 154 392 2010 149 148 2011 153 321 2012 159 071 2013 143 671 2014 142 178 2015 132 664 2016 133 658 2017 133 257 (17) according to article 1 of the 2004 concession, the duration of the concession allows the amortisation of previous investments and a new programme of investments by camed with a value of eur 24 million (italian lira 47 662 million) (9). according to the 2004 concession, camed also provided a guarantee (cauzione) of eur 275 000 in respect of the obligations provided for under the concession. (18) according to article 3 of the 2004 concession, pan also committed to perform structural works on the area granted to camed by 2006 and more specifically to: (i) adapt the pumping plant of docks nos 1 and 2; (ii) build a new certified dry-dock caisson (barche-porte) for docks nos 1, 2 and 3; (iii) redevelop walls (paramenti) and bedding (platea) for dock no 2; (iv) conduct structural redevelopment of quays (banchine) and walls for dock no 2 and quay 33b. (19) after the opening decision, the italian authorities clarified that camed carried out investments in the amount of eur 24 610 420 in accordance with the 2004 concession and additional investments in the amount of eur 17 931 075 until 2016. 2.2. allegation of state aid by the complainant (20) in the first submission, the complainant argued that camed received aid at both levels: (i) as an operator (i.e. manager of the dry-docks), by means of a reduction of the costs for the refurbishment of the infrastructure (operating aid); and (ii) as a user of the infrastructure (e.g. as a ship-repairer), because the infrastructure, which should in principle be open to all business end-users on a non-discriminatory basis, was in fact solely used by camed. the complaint also contained antitrust allegations that are not relevant for the present decision and for which the complainant has been the addressee of a separate decision adopted on 24 july 2014. (21) according to the complainant, the advantage received by camed derived from the performance of the following works (the interventions): (1) intervention no 1: structural refurbishment of some parts of dock no 3 (aid amount: eur 12 928 537). (2) intervention no 2: adaptation of the pumping plant of docks nos 1 and 2, renewal of pier walls adjacent to dock no 2 (aid amount: eur 23 170 000). (3) intervention no 3: repair and strengthening of the internal pier of dock no 3 (molo cesario console) (aid amount: eur 13 000 000). (22) with the submission of 19 november 2013, the complainant extended the scope of the complaint claiming that the interventions conferred aid to pan, in line with the commission's case practice (10). according to the complainant there would also be aid at the level of the concessionaire (camed) because the concession was not entrusted by means of a public, open, transparent and non-discriminatory tender. the complainant further underlined the absence of any evidence to conclude that the land use fee paid by camed could exclude any advantage. according to the complainant, the methodology foreseen by the national legislation for setting the land use fees (see recital 16) does not allow to reflect the increased value of the infrastructure after possible interventions, since it consists in a fixed amount of eur/sqm. (23) on 1 october 2015 the complainant also provided a list of pan's decisions (delibere no 308/2015, no 181/2015, no 233/2015, no 277/2015, no 279/2015, no 281/2015, no 293/2015, no 302/2015) for works to be carried out in the dry-docks, as evidence of the breach of the standstill obligation. 2.3. italy's comments on the alleged state aid measure/financing of the investment project and legal basis (24) the italian authorities clarified before the adoption of the opening decision that only part of the works foreseen for the refurbishment of dry-dock no 3 have been completed in 2006, following a public procurement procedure (intervention no 1), while the works foreseen by interventions 2 and 3 had not been completed at that time. of the whole project agreed with camed in the 2001 agreement and the 2004 concession, only one part had actually been fully performed. (25) according to italy, the legal right to receive the financing had already been granted to pan in 1998 pursuant to article 9 of law 413/1998, which provides that the ministry of transport and shipping (the ministry) shall adopt a programme of investments in ports on the basis of the requests of port authorities (11). it appears that the programme of investments was adopted by means of two decrees issued by the ministry, and was modified subsequently. the first decree of 27 october 1999 (12) (the ministerial decree of 27 october 1999) lists 20 ports benefitting from the national funding and the second decree (13) (the ministerial decree of 2 may 2001) extends that list to 25 ports. on the basis of those decrees, port authorities are authorised to borrow or to request other financial operations for a total amount of 100 billion italian lira (around eur 51 million). the ministry would directly repay the financial institutions every year (14). therefore, according to italy, the measures in favour of pan were granted in 1998 by means of law 413/1998. (26) after the opening decision, the italian authorities provided additional clarifications on the amounts of investments by the italian state and pan. intervention no 1 (27) the italian authorities indicated that the works on intervention no 1 started on 21 october 2002 and were completed on 24 january 2006. the costs incurred at the time when the present decision has been adopted amount to eur 12 859 854,50. intervention no 2 (28) intervention no 2 has been co-financed by the ministry in the amount of eur 14 971 621,41. the amount of eur 5 498 378,59, to be partly advanced by pan and then reimbursed through cash grants by the ministry, however has not been paid by the ministry. (29) for intervention no 2, pan provided own resources of eur 2 700 000 (delibera 89/2016 of 22 march 2016) and eur 5 830 000 (delibera 175/2017 of 31 may 2017). (30) the works on intervention no 2 started on 5 november 2012 and have not been completed yet. the costs incurred at the time of adoption of this decision amount to eur 11 192 515,79. the total costs for this intervention are projected to come to eur 29 000 000. intervention no 3 (31) finally, intervention no 3 is funded partly through pan's own resources (eur 5 091 000, provided in delibera 356/2014 of 24 december 2014). (32) as of december 2017, the works in respect of intervention no 3 had not started yet (the works were awarded on 19 july 2017) and the costs incurred amounted to eur 6 880,50. the total costs for this intervention are projected to come to eur 15 900 000. (33) the total cost of the investment project (namely, all three intervention) is eur 57 759 874,5, which was divided into three parts as demonstrated in table 2. table 2 planned public investments intervention amounts paid? date of payment planned investment cost 1. structural refurbishment of some parts of dock no 3 9 760 629,57 yes 8.1.2003 21.12.2004 14.7.2005 26.10.2005 12.12.2011 12 859 854,50 3 099 224,93 yes 31.12.2002 26.4.2004 19.4.2005 6.10.2005 24.4.2006 2. adaptation of the pumping plant of docks nos 1 and 2, renewal of pier walls adjacent to dock no 2 8 300 000,00 yes 4.8.2006 27.12.2006 29.12.2006 29 000 000,00 6 671 621,41 yes 1.9.2011 22.3.2013 17.12.2014 2 700 000,00 (own contribution pan) yes 23.3.2016 5 498 378,59 (to be advanced by pan and reimbursed by the italian state) no n/a 5 830 000,00 (own contribution pan) yes 31.5.2017 3. repair and strengthening of the internal pier of dock no 3 10 809 000,00 yes 18.11.2014 15 900 000 5 091 000,00 (own contribution pan) yes 24.12.2014 total funding by pan 13 621 000,00 total funding by italian state 44 138 854,50 total 57 759 854,50 (34) in the light of the above, the funding by the italian state already granted or committed for this project amounted to eur 44 138 854,50. it mainly took the form of direct reimbursement made to the financial institutions for the loans entered into by pan by the ministry as well as direct grants to pan from the italian national budget. the italian authorities explained that the remaining amount of eur 13 621 000 (of which eur 2 700 000 and eur 5 830 000 for intervention no 2 and eur 5 091 000 for intervention no 3) was provided by pan from their own resources, accumulated in the context of the exercise of its economic activity of managing the port. 2.4. grounds for initiating the procedure (35) on 28 june 2016, the commission adopted a decision to open formal investigation with respect to the above mentioned measures in order to address its doubts whether these measures constitute state aid within the meaning of article 107(1) tfeu and whether they are compatible with the internal market. 2.4.1. doubts on the presence of aid to pan (36) in the opening decision, the commission took the preliminary view that the measures constitutes state aid within the meaning of article 107(1) tfeu because pan received state resources to upgrade ship repair facilities which are commercially exploited by it. pan as an entity performing an economic activity on behalf of the owner, i.e. the italian state can be qualified as an undertaking. therefore, that transfer seems to amount to a transfer of state resources and is imputable to the state. (37) furthermore, according to the opening decision, the public funding seems to confer a selective economic advantage to pan. the commission raised doubts whether pan is required to discharge public service obligations (pso) that have been clearly defined and that fulfil the four cumulative altmark conditions. the service provided by pan (i.e. the rental of ship-repairing facilities in exchange for remuneration) does not exhibit any special characteristics compared with those of other economic activities. the commission raised doubts as to whether (i) pan is actually required to discharge a pso and those obligations have been clearly defined, (ii) the parameters on the basis of which the compensation is calculated have been established beforehand in an objective and transparent manner, (iii) the compensation does not exceed what is necessary to cover the costs incurred in discharging the pso, taking into account the relevant receipts and a reasonable profit for discharging those obligations, (iv) the operator has been chosen on the basis of a public procurement procedure or the costs of discharging the pso are limited to the costs of a typical undertaking (well-run and adequately provided with means of transport so as to be able to meet the necessary public service requirements). (38) the commission preliminarily considered that the investment project will allow pan to continue the economic activity of renting out the dry-docks, which is a sector open to competition and trade at union level and that the measure is liable to distort competition and affect intra-union trade. (39) in the opening decision, the commission found that qualifying the measures as state aid would not result in a violation of article 345 tfeu, setting out the principle of neutrality between public and private entities. the commission preliminarily noted that considering the measures as state aid does not seem to discriminate against public owners, since private owners in the same business would also have to prepare an ex ante business plan and would carry out the investment only if it was profitable on that basis. if this is not the case, both public and private owners could potentially receive compatible aid if all the conditions foreseen in the applicable state aid rules in the shipbuilding sector are respected. (40) furthermore, in the opening decision, the commission took the preliminary view that the measures at issue could not be classified as existing aid within the meaning of article 1(b) of regulation (eu) 2015/1589 (the procedural regulation) since public support to shipbuilding and ship repair facilities had been considered to constitute state aid even before the leipzig halle judgment. 2.4.2. doubts on the presence of aid to camed (41) concerning possible aid to camed, the commission noted in the opening decision that the public support to pan partly relieved it from investment costs that any other private owner of ship-repairing facilities in the market would have to pay in full, thus allowing it to charge lower fees to camed. (42) the measures at issue are imputable to the state (i.e. granted by pan, which forms part of the state administration even if the entity in question enjoys legal autonomy from other public authorities). in addition, the commission found in the opening decision that by providing the dry-docks to camed potentially below market rates, pan could have waived state resources. (43) in the absence of a tender and since the land use fee that camed pays to pan was calculated on the basis of fixed legal parameters, the commission took the preliminary view that the contractual arrangements between pan and camed may bestow a possible economic advantage above market conditions on camed by providing refurbished dry-docks potentially below market rates. moreover, even if it could be accepted that camed undertook some investments in exchange for the completion of the interventions, there was no indication that the value of the investments carried out by camed for pan, together with the land use fee, correspond to the value of the interventions performed by pan for camed. the commission thus invited the italian authorities and third parties to comment on these preliminary conclusions. (44) in the opening decision, the commission raised doubts whether the four altmark conditions are cumulatively fulfilled with respect to the measures in support of camed. (45) the commission also noted that the measures were liable to distort competition and affect intra-union trade. 2.4.3. doubts on compatibility of the aid (46) on compatibility, the commission preliminarily considered that dry-docks are not transport infrastructures, but production facilities for shipyards as they are used for ship building or ship repairing and not for transport purposes. consequently, the aid could not be assessed directly under article 107(3)(c) tfeu as an investment aid for transport infrastructure. 2.4.3.1. compatibility of the aid to pan (47) the commission expressed doubts on the compatibility of the aid to pan under the 2011 sgei framework and under the state aid rules for the shipbuilding sector applicable at the time of granting each measure. in the opening decision, the commission took the preliminary view that the granting in principle occurred when each of the investments was included in the programme of investments on the basis of the port authorities' request. the commission considered that the information in this respect was insufficient and invited italy to provide the relevant granting dates for each measure/intervention. (48) nevertheless, the commission raised doubts as to the full compliance of the measures at issue as the aid intensity seemed to exceed the maximum permissible aid intensity for regional investment aid for shipbuilding facilities (to which reference is made in the successive frameworks), irrespective of the precise date of granting of each measure and under the following compatibility bases that could be applicable for shipbuilding aid: council regulation (ec) no 1540/98, which entered into force on 1 january 1999 until 31 december 2003 (15); the 2004 framework on state aid to shipbuilding, which was originally applicable from 1 january 2004 until 31 december 2006, and was later prolonged twice until 31 december 2008 and until 31 december 2011 (16); the 2011 framework on state aid to shipbuilding (17), which was applicable to non-notified aid granted after 31 december 2011. the application of this framework has been extended until 30 june 2014 (18); the guidelines on regional state aid for 2014-2020 as from 1 july 2014 (19). (49) as italy did not provide the information necessary to establish the clear date of granting, the commission was not in a position to perform a complete compatibility assessment as it could not identify the correct legal basis. in the opening decision, the commission noted that it could not be excluded that at least part of the measures could be declared compatible under the relevant state aid rules and invited the italian authorities to provide a compatibility analysis for each measure. 2.4.3.2. compatibility of the aid to camed (50) the commission raised doubts as to the compatibility of the measures under the 2011 sgei framework with regard to the alleged aid to camed. (51) however, as the commission could not exclude entirely that at least part of the measures to pan could be declared compatible under the relevant state aid rules which were applicable in the shipbuilding sector at the time of granting the measures, it was not excluded that such assessment could also influence the compatibility assessment regarding aid to camed. the commission invited the italian authorities to provide a compatibility analysis for each measure (regarding camed) on the basis of the applicable law, depending on the dates of granting of each measure. 3. comments from italy 3.1. comments on the opening decision (52) in the view of the italian authorities, the opening decision infringes the primary sources of union law and the general principles of sound administration, legal certainty, legitimate expectation and effective judicial protection. italy argues that any commission decision would in effect revoke a prior decision to close the case, which the commission had taken in 2006 (20). (53) italy further argues that the completion of proceedings within a reasonable length of time is a general principle of union law (21), preventing the commission from extending at its own discretion the length of the preliminary stage of the investigation initiated following receipt of a complaint relating to alleged aid which has not been notified unless such a measure was unlawful (22). according to the italian authorities this is not the case in the current proceedings. (54) the italian authorities refer to article 16(1) of the procedural regulation, according to which the commission shall not require recovery of the aid if this would be contrary to a general principle of union law. 3.1.1. on the presence of aid to pan (55) with regard to the existence of aid to pan, italy explained that the port authorities are not undertakings, but non-economic public entities (enti pubblici non economici), governed by public law (e.g. law no 84/1994, the italian framework law on ports) (23). the national port authorities possess administrative, organisational, regulatory, budgetary and financial independence. the italian state gave the port authorities the institutional mandate of carrying out, on its behalf and solely in the public interest, the functions of administration, regulation and control of italian ports. the port authorities, therefore, do not commercially exploit the property assets owned by the state, but merely administer them, in fulfilment of the institutional mandate given to them. (56) the italian authorities argue that port authorities do not offer goods or services on any market and therefore do not perform an economic activity. pursuant to article 6 of law no 84/1994, port authorities cannot perform port activities directly or indirectly (24). moreover, the administration of italian ports is reserved by law for the port authority with responsibility in the area. therefore, according to italy, while performing the institutional mandate of administering italian ports, the port authorities do not act on a market open to competition since (i) no other party may carry out that activity and (ii) they are prohibited from performing economic activities in sectors open to competition. (57) according to the italian authorities, the land use fee (canone demaniale) is not a compensation for the provision of an economic service, but rather a consideration for the private occupation of publicly-owned property. the collection of the fee, on behalf of the state, falls within the institutional mandate given to port authorities. (58) according to the italian authorities, only commercial fees, which can be decided independently by the port authorities and calculated in accordance with values on the market could qualify the activity as economic (25). in the present case however the fee is determined by ministerial decree no 595/1995 on the basis of fixed parameters that relate to the area of the property over which a concession has been granted. the fees are applied by all italian port authorities for all concessions, irrespective of the use that the concessionaire intends to make of the area in question, or of any profits or losses that may be obtained. the fee is therefore part of the overall tax burden imposed on entities operating on land owned by the state, not just in the shipbuilding sector. furthermore, the italian authorities note that the fee cannot be set on the basis of market values as there is no market relating to the ownership and/or management of public assets. (59) italy further explains that the measures were not selective as the works on the dry-docks of the port of naples is one of the numerous investments that the italian state made in assets that it owns, which do not solely relate to ports. the italian state finances the specific maintenance of a large variety of assets belonging to the public, among which (under the navigation code and the civil code) are the italian ports, including masonry docks. (60) furthermore, public funding for works to expand, modernise and upgrade ports allocated on the basis of law 413/1998 (and refinanced under law no 388/2000 and law no 166/2002) have been available to all italian port authorities (26). the specific maintenance on dry-docks nos 1, 2 and 3 is not an ad hoc investment decision but it constitutes an internal fund transfer to public authorities in compliance with the national legal system, which stipulates that the state has ownership and is responsible for the administration of ports. the italian authorities argue that the commission cannot challenge under article 107 tfeu measures that are not selective but are of general scope and which represent an expression of economic and industrial policy choices of individual member states. (61) regarding a possible economic advantage to pan, the italian authorities consider that pursuant to law no 84/1994 and law no 112/1998 (27) the specific refurbishing works are borne by the owner, i.e. the italian state, and not the infrastructure manager. therefore, the public funding of the specific maintenance costs does not mitigate any burden on the port authority, nor does it confer any advantage to it. (62) furthermore, according to italy, there is no economic advantage for pan as the measures are necessary for the execution of sgei, i.e. for the management of dry docks (within the mandate conferred and the prohibitions imposed on the port authority as per law no 84/1994). according to italy, this activity carried out by all italian port authorities is expressly described by national law as falling within the scope of sgei. therefore, the measures do not confer any selective advantage upon pan as compared with other italian port authorities. (63) the italian authorities refer to protocol 26 to the tfeu which grants wide discretion to national authorities regarding sgei and consider that the commission's role is limited to the control of a manifest error. according to italy, the sgei activity does not consist in the rental of an infrastructure against remuneration nor in the direct use of the infrastructure by pan to carry out shipbuilding activities. the scope of the sgei is the obligation imposed on italian port authorities by law no 84/1994 to manage dry-docks on behalf of the italian state, and in particular the duty to perform and take care of the specific maintenance of these assets owned by the state, in accordance with the public interest. (64) the public finance granted by the state to allow the repair of dry docks nos 1, 2 and 3 did not confer any advantage upon pan, since it merely constituted a transfer of resources within the public domain for the performance of specific functions granted by the state to the port authorities, or alternatively, the repayment of costs incurred by pan in meeting the obligations imposed by law no 84/1994 on all italian port authorities. (65) regarding the refurbishment works, the italian authorities explained that the public financing does not exceed what is strictly necessary to repay the costs incurred by pan. the contracts for the works were awarded on the basis of a public tender process (resulting in a reduction in the costs compared with what had initially been estimated). in addition, camed has made significant investments complementary to those made by pan in the amount of more than eur 40 million. (66) regarding the institutional task of managing the ports on behalf of the state, italy further stated that, in accordance with articles 28 and 29 of the navigation code and with articles 822 and 823 of the civil code, this task cannot be conferred upon other entities than the port authorities and much less through a tender procedure. by contrast, the concession of the state-owned assets in question was awarded to camed pursuant to national law (28) and in a competitive and non-discriminatory manner and in accordance with the principles of the union. (67) italy also claims that the measures did not distort competition nor affect trade among member states. the port sector in italy is not liberalised, therefore the italian port authorities do not operate in a sector open to competition. according to the italian authorities, the commission erred in the opening decision in classifying the activity as renting out rather than as granting a concession over state assets. in contrast to a tenant renting an asset, a concessionaire has to abide by the public interest and undergo checks by the port authority in compliance with public law. (68) furthermore, italy claims that the commission neglected to take into account the differences between member states in the way they manage ports. in the absence of a uniform approach at union level, italy opted to retain the management of the port sector within the public remit. therefore, since the port sector in italy is not liberalised, and since the port authorities do not operate in a sector open to competition, according to italy, the measures did not distort competition nor affect trade among member states within the meaning of article 107(1) tfeu. (69) the italian authorities believe that classifying the measures as state aid would be a violation of article 345 tfeu, setting out the principle of neutrality between private and public entities. a private owner could invest as much as he desires in its assets, while investments by the state in its own infrastructure would always be state aid. the italian authorities disagree with the preliminary consideration by the commission that private owners would normally only undertake investments that are profitable (an example could be investments for image enhancing purposes). (70) italy further states that, according to article 345 tfeu, union law cannot impose any privatisation on member states, nor require the sale of assets that the member state decided to retain in public ownership, especially in the absence of common measures to liberalise the sector. any different interpretation would infringe the general principle of equal treatment which makes it illegal to treat in the same way facts that are markedly different. (71) the commission, furthermore, may not prevent member states from carrying out the maintenance of such assets. the right to preserve one's own assets in an operational state and to ensure they work efficiently lays at the heart of the right of ownership, which is now also protected by the charter of fundamental rights of the european union, a primary source of law that is also binding upon union institutions. (72) regarding the classification of the measures as existing aid, italy points out that the commission in the preliminary conclusions sent to the complainant in 2013 stated that the dry docks concerned are part of the maritime state property. the italian authorities point out that until the leipzig halle judgement, the commission itself considered investment in infrastructure, including in port areas, to be an activity falling outside the scope of article 107 tfeu. in the period in which the works on docks nos 1, 2 and 3 in the port of naples were decided upon, (i.e. before 2001), public support for infrastructure did not normally constitute aid, but rather general measures derived from the state's sovereignty in respect of economic policy, land planning and development. (73) the italian authorities refer further to the notice on the notion of aid (29), which states that due to the uncertainty that existed prior to the a roports de paris judgment, public authorities could legitimately consider that the public funding of infrastructure granted prior to that judgment did not constitute state aid and that, accordingly, such measures did not need to be notified to the commission. therefore, italy considers that those measures cannot be put into question on the basis of state aid rules in view of the principles of legal certainty and legitimate expectations (30). (74) concerning the preliminary conclusion of the commission in the opening decision that state support to shipbuilding and ship repair facilities has always been considered state aid (even before the leipzig halle judgement), the italian authorities made the following observations. according to italy, the commission wrongfully refers in the opening decision to commission decision no 94/374/ec (31). italy states that pursuant to that decision, various public support measures to assist ship-repair facilities at [a] dry-dock could fall within the scope of article 107 tfeu. the decision thus related to the facilities, i.e. port superstructures (moveable structures, cranes etc.) owned by individual concessionaires, and not to state-owned port infrastructure. the decision expressly states that (i) public finance to the entity managing an italian port relates to the management of regional infrastructures and does not therefore constitute state aid and (ii) measures for the financing of infrastructures to be set up by a public body cannot be regarded as state aid within the meaning of article 107(1) tfeu, confirming that until the leipzig halle judgment the commission itself considered investment in infrastructure, including in port areas, to be an activity not falling within the scope of article 107 tfeu. (75) italy reiterates the argument that the italian port authorities do not operate on a market that is open to competition. in accordance with well-established case law, aid implemented in non-liberalised markets constitutes existing aid which may only be held incompatible ex nunc and as such is not required to be repaid. 3.1.2. on the presence of aid to camed (76) as regards the alleged aid to camed, the italian authorities explained that under italian law, the extraordinary works for the refurbishment of the dry-docks fall within the area of responsibility of the owner (i.e. the state), and not of the operator of the infrastructure. similarly to a rental contract, ordinary works are within the area of responsibility of the operator, whereas the owner must ensure that the infrastructure remains adequate for the use that is allowed to the operator under the concession contract for its entire duration. at the end of the concession period, the infrastructure will remain property of the state. according to the italian authorities, this is the case not only for the 2004 concession awarded to camed, but for all the concessions for the use and operation of state properties (32). (77) italy claims therefore that the measures have a general, cross-cutting scope, because in line with the public model under which the italian legislature has organised the ports sector, every italian port authority (not just the pan) has always received, and continues to receive public funds intended to finance infrastructure work on state-owned assets. it follows from this that all undertakings (not just camed) operating in the port area in all italian ports (not just naples) and in all economic sectors (not just shipbuilding) have benefitted from aid that is identical to that which camed has allegedly enjoyed. the italian authorities argue that all economic operators that have obtained a concession over state property: (i) participated in an open and competitive process, (ii) have been able to use areas, assets and infrastructure built and repaired using public funds and (iii) paid a land use fee in accordance with national law. therefore, camed has not obtained any selective advantage as compared with other undertakings that are in comparable factual and legal situations such as other shipbuilders, terminal operators, shipping companies etc. (33). furthermore, camed is required by the 2002 regulation to grant access to the state-owned infrastructure to other operators under equal conditions and on the basis of transparent and non-discriminatory priority criteria, in accordance with published tariffs, which in the view of the italian authorities, further reiterates the non-selectivity of the measures. (78) the land use fee paid by camed for the use of the state property is established in compliance with national law and in particular with the ministerial decree no 595/1995. pan did not have the possibility to charge camed lower fees also as this is not a commercial fee negotiated between the parties in line with market fees. the land use fees are determined in an objective way and are identical for all maritime land concessions for this type of activities, thus in a non-selective manner. therefore, the measure did not reduce the costs to be borne by pan nor did it enable it to charge camed lower fees. (79) furthermore, the italian authorities consider that it is not necessary, during the concession period, for the concessionaire of state-owned assets to invest an amount which when combined with the fee paid, would equal the amount of any specific maintenance carried out by the state as the sole owner of the asset. the concessionaire for the temporary use of the asset does not have a duty to bear the same financial burdens as an owner would in order to maintain these assets in an operational condition, thus increasing their value. (80) the italian authorities further state that the opening decision does not take into account the fact that, although it was not necessary, camed has carried out a considerable plan of investments complementary to those carried out by pan, exceeding eur 40 million. (81) the italian authorities are of the opinion that with the investment project camed did not obtain any advantage, since the 2004 concession was awarded to camed through an open and public procedure (see recital 15) and camed has the right to operate an infrastructure which must be adequate for the agreed use. moreover, in the view of the italian authorities, directive 2014/23/eu of the european parliament and of the council (34) on the award of concession contracts does not apply to tenders regarding concessions of port areas. therefore, pan was not required to issue a call for tender for the award of the concession relative to those dry-docks, and in particular in relation to a concession granted more than 10 years before that directive entered into force. (82) italy also argues that the measures neither distort competition nor affect trade among member states since they do not strengthen the position of one undertaking against others active in the same sector. under the conditions laid down in the 2002 regulation, any undertaking may ask to use the docks, irrespective of its place of establishment. according to the italian authorities, the measures, therefore, do not have any effect on cross-border investment and/or establishment conditions. (83) according to italy, the commission cannot challenge a general public measure that is applicable across all of the national territory and to all undertakings operating there, by claiming that the measure confers an advantage on those operators as compared with the conditions enjoyed by undertakings established and operating in other member states. whether or not a selective advantage is conferred should be determined, in fact, solely on a national basis, since in the absence of common union-wide rules, a comparison with the conditions offered to undertakings in different member states would in effect compare different factual and legal situations arising from legislative and regulatory disparities between the member states, and would thus distort the aim and functioning of state aid control. (84) the italian authorities repeat the arguments concerning the classification of the measures as existing aid (see recital 75). 3.1.3. on compatibility of the alleged aid to pan and camed (85) italy disagrees with the commission's assessment that the granting occurred when each of the investments was included in the programme of investments on the basis of the port authorities' requests. italy reiterates that the date of the award of a state aid scheme must be identified as the time at which the legal basis entered into force that created an entitlement for the alleged beneficiary to obtain the support measures, and not the date of adoption of subsequent, potentially numerous, implementing measures. italy notes that all the implementing measures identified by the commission make express reference to the refinancing acts under law no 413/1998, which is therefore the genuine sole legal basis for the action, as well as to the various decisions by pan in 2001 and the concession granted to camed in 2004. (86) according to italy, the measures should not be assessed on the basis of the shipbuilding frameworks (see recital 48), because the measures concern merely the specific maintenance of state-owned port infrastructure. in the view of the italian authorities, the alleged aid is not designed to promote an increase in productivity of the existing installations in a shipyard, i.e. of port superstructure (moveable structures, cranes, etc.), but rather to carry out specific maintenance to certain items of port infrastructure that are the sole property of the state. this is in order to stop them becoming obsolescent, particularly in terms of safety, and in view of the fact that all port users can access them on an equal footing and under non-discriminatory conditions. thus, the compatibility of the measures in question cannot be assessed on the basis of sectoral rules regarding aid for shipbuilding. (87) according to italy, the measures are compatible with the internal market according to both article 107(2)(b) and article 107(3)(c) tfeu, because they aim at restoring state-owned property following the second world war and the earthquake of 1980 that affected the city of naples. the alleged aid measures are proportionate as the public funding is limited to what was strictly necessary and the works for the specific maintenance were awarded through an open, competitive tender procedure that made it possible to reduce costs compared with the original estimates. the italian authorities further note that camed has carried out significant investments, reducing the intensity of the public contribution to approximately 40 % of the total investment costs. the measures are further proportionate as based on the law applicable to public concessions the works carried out by the concessionaire remain in the state ownership at the end of the concession and camed would not be entitled to any compensation or repayment. italy reiterates that the alleged aid measures benefit the economy of a disadvantaged region which is an assisted region in accordance with article 107(3)(a) tfeu. (88) the italian authorities submitted further information in november 2017, in which they reiterated their view that the state aid rules applicable to shipbuilding do not constitute the correct legal basis to assess the compatibility of the aid. nevertheless, the italian authorities provided the following comments. (89) with regard to the compatibility of the aid granted to pan, italy confirmed that pan did not submit aid applications (invoking the relevant shipbuilding rules) before the start of works on each of the investments. the italian authorities confirmed their position that the funds were used for the maintenance of the existing port infrastructure and do not constitute aid to shipbuilding facilities. (90) finally, italy argues that the amounts under assessment could not be recovered, as the statute of limitations established by article 17 of the procedural regulation expired. 4. comments from interested parties 4.1. comments from camed (91) camed argues that the legality of the measures in question has already been examined and was ascertained in 2006, when the commission requested information from the italian authorities and subsequently terminated the procedure. the opening decision thus constitutes an unlawful revocation of that termination decision, made more than 10 years after the first measure, which violates the general principles of union law of sound administration, legal certainty and effective judicial protection. (92) moreover, camed considers that the measures in question do not constitute state aid either for pan or itself as it concerns the ordinary management and administration of a particular asset category rather than a specific economic activity, namely, public property belonging to the state. none of the conditions of article 107(1) tfeu are met. (93) camed repeats italy's arguments that port authorities are non-economic public entities prohibited under law no 84/1994 from engaging in any economic activity or from providing port services. nor are italian port authorities, according to camed, free to determine the amount of state fees collected from concessionaires on behalf of the state, since these were established in ministerial decree no 595/1995. (94) according to camed, the work does not confer an economic advantage on pan or itself. the remedial maintenance of the public assets in question by law falls exclusively to the state as their owner and in addition is necessary and instrumental for the provision of pso. as such, the measures do not relieve camed of any financial burden or confer any advantage on it. (95) camed further points out that when the public measures were planned and approved, it was not the concessionaire of the public land concerned, since the open and competitive tendering procedure was yet to take place. therefore, pan committed to the investment regardless of the future concessionaire's identity. any undertaking could have submitted a competing bid for the concession, and could have obtained the assets under concession. hence the procedure passes the market economy operator test and confers no advantage on the successful bidder. (96) camed further states that the measures at hand are not selective as this is a standard method of intervention by the state which, in general (and not just for ports or the shipbuilding industry), seeks to maintain a vast quantity and variety of public assets and infrastructure in safe working order. this particularly applies to those assets that the state has decided should be publicly owned a decision exempt from review by the commission under article 345 tfeu. in the present case, the work was also planned and authorised as part of a funding programme launched in 1998 by national law for the construction of infrastructure for the expansion, modernisation and redevelopment of all italian ports. (97) according to camed, this further demonstrates the non-selective nature of the measures, both with regard to (i) the position of pan relative to all other port authorities, which received the same public funding to carry out work on publicly owned assets and infrastructure in ports within their territorial jurisdiction; and (ii) camed's position relative to other companies operating in the shipbuilding industry and elsewhere, whether in the port of naples or in any other italian port. (98) moreover, in camed's view, under the rules governing the use of the public infrastructure on which the maintenance work was carried out, any undertaking is entitled to have access on request to the docks operated by it under the concession, on the basis of transparent and non-discriminatory criteria and in return for the payment of public tariffs. access to the infrastructure is on a level playing field with other potential users, not only other ship repairers, but any party interested in using the infrastructure, for example shipping companies, port service operators, shipping agents and vessel management companies. camed considers that this serves as further confirmation of the non-selective nature of the measures to renovate the docks, which do not favour certain undertakings or the production of certain goods. (99) camed also repeats italy's arguments on the lack of distortion of competition or effect on trade among member states. (100) camed believes that the measures would in any case be compatible with the internal market under both article 107(2) tfeu, as it is aimed at recovering the damage caused by a natural disaster or exceptional occurrences, in this case the bombing and the earthquake of 1980; and article 107(3) tfeu, as the measures pursue an objective of common interest. furthermore, the measures are proportionate due to the investments carried out by camed itself (in the amount of eur 42 541 495) that reduced the intensity of the state intervention to approximately 40 % of total costs. according to the information provided, camed invested eur 11,1 million in the docks, and the remaining amounts in other items relating to for example, the goods/land covered by the concession fee, warehousing and buildings, transport costs, it and office equipment. (101) finally, camed states that if the measures are considered aid, the aid would constitute existing aid, given that the statute of limitations of article 17 of the procedural regulation has expired. 4.2. comments from the complainant (102) the complainant agrees with the preliminary assessment of the commission that pan should be considered as an undertaking engaged in economic activities. the complainant considers that it should be an undisputed fact by now that national ports carry out economic activities, in competition with each other and with other european and mediterranean ports, considering the clarifications brought by the commission in its case practice. for example, in its decision dating from 2012 (35), the commission considered that the port authority of augusta was an undertaking in carrying out its economic activity consisting of the exploitation of port infrastructure owned by the state through the leasing of this infrastructure to port operators, in exchange for a concession fee. this is a precedent for pan as the port authority of augusta operates on the basis of the same national rules (36). (103) regarding the concession fee, the complainant believes that it has been determined under national legislation (37) which was wrongly held to be applicable since the concession does not exclusively concern the use of the docks for shipbuilding purposes, but also the management of the dry docks by camed. as such, the complainant alleges that by granting the direct award of the concession to camed without organising a tender, pan waived its right to receive a fee for the dry docks management, since pan only perceives a fee for the land concession. the complainant also specifies that article 6 of the concession contract expressly provides that camed shall pay the fee to pan as consideration for this concession and not by way of a taxation. (104) the complainant agrees with the preliminary assessment of the commission regarding the public nature of the resources and the selectivity of the measures that benefit pan. the complainant also specifically alleges that the measures cannot represent a mere transfer of resources among public administrations. indeed, according to law no 84/1994, although port authorities are non-economic public entities having legal personality under public law, they have large administrative and monetary autonomy and the ministerial scrutiny does not apply to the award of concessions relating, inter alia, to the management of dry-docks. (105) the complainant agrees with the preliminary assessment of the commission that the measures do not satisfy the four condition of the altmark case and therefore that the administration of dry-docks carried out by pan does not represent a service of general economic interest and granted pan an economic advantage. (106) the complainant agrees with the preliminary assessment of the commission that the measures are liable to distort competition among european ports and affect trade among member states. in particular, the complainant reiterates that the italian ports compete with various european ports within a competitive market and consequently that the argument of the italian authorities that the demand for ship-repair infrastructure is local in scale must be rejected. (107) the complainant agrees with the preliminary assessment of the commission regarding the existence of state aid for camed because pan may have waived public resources by assigning to camed the concession of the dry-docks for a price which is below the market price. the complainant also supports the preliminary assessment of the commission that camed received an economic advantage both because the concession was assigned not through a proper tender but by means of a different procedure (whose publicity was deemed to be only local), and because the concession fee was determined on a fixed parameter basis (without consideration for the infrastructure with which the area is equipped) and not on a market price basis. the complainant explains again that the concession includes not only the right to use the state-owned infrastructure for shipbuilding, but also for dry-docks management. indeed, the way the concession fee is determined does reflect the two activities carried out by camed and the true economic value of the concession. (108) the complainant also alleges that the management of the dry-docks is a service of considerable economic value that could be estimated to represent an annual turnover for camed between eur 6 million and eur 9 million (versus an yearly fee paid by camed amounting to eur 137 409,68) and therefore that the value over the total duration of the concession for the management of the public dry-docks is between eur 180 million and eur 270 million. in particular, the fee revenue received by camed is made up of the fees paid for: (i) the use of the dry-docks and (ii) the provision by camed of other associated services (e.g. activity necessary for the entry, exit and maintenance of a vessel in a dock or supply of electricity). the complainant underlines that camed can set up the fees freely without any control of pan and that the fees charged by camed are excessive and far higher than the fees charged by managers of similar type of infrastructure located in other ports (in november 2012, camed increased the fees by over 300 %). (109) the complainant agrees with the preliminary assessment of the commission that the cumulative conditions of the altmark case are not fulfilled for camed and consequently that it cannot be considered that camed's activities represent a pso. the complainant considers that, if at all, only the operation of the dry-dock number 3 may constitute a public service since it represents the largest basin in the port of naples. in addition, as a matter of fact, the dry-docks managed by camed are not really open to third users. camed is a privileged user that prevents other port operators from having free access. in addition, the fees camed requires to grant access to third users to the infrastructure are allegedly over the market price. (110) according to the complainant, the measures distort competition on two levels. firstly, as infrastructure manager, camed received an advantage over its potential competitors by (i) having been granted the concession to manage the dry-docks without a tender procedure and (ii) paying an unjustifiably low level of fees to pan while charging excessive fees to other ship-repairers wanting to use the docks. secondly, as a ship-repair undertaking, camed received an advantage as an unduly privileged user of the public docks. (111) concerning the effect on trade, the complainant underlines that the demand for shipbuilding infrastructure comes mainly from international operators, often belonging to big multinational groups. (112) on the compatibility of the aid measures with the internal market, the complainant agrees with the preliminary assessment of the commission the dry-docks are not transport infrastructures and, as such, do not fall into the scope of article 107(3)(c) tfeu. moreover, the complainant considers that the measures do not meet the compatibility criteria of (i) article 107(3)(a) or (c) relating to regional aid or (ii) the 2011 sgei framework or (iii) the sectoral rules concerning state aid in the shipbuilding sector. (113) finally, the complainant supports the commission's view that the aid measures were granted at the time when the relevant works were included in the investment programme drawn up on the basis of pan's requests, and not in 1998 (as argued by the italian authorities) by means of article 9 of law no 413/1998. 5. assessment (114) according to article 107(1) tfeu, any aid granted by a member state or through state resources in any form whatsoever which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain undertakings or the provision of certain goods shall, in so far as it affects trade between member states, be incompatible with the internal market. (115) the qualification of a measure as aid within the meaning of this provision therefore presupposes that the following cumulative conditions are met: (i) the measure must be imputable to the state and financed through state resources; (ii) it must confer an advantage on its recipient; (iii) that advantage must be selective; and (iv) the measure must distort or threaten to distort competition and affect trade between member states. 5.1. existence of aid to the port authority of naples 5.1.1. notion of undertaking (116) under italian law, port authorities are non-economic public entities aiming to ensure the overall maintenance and development of port infrastructure. to that end, the financial resources at the disposal of a port authority may be used exclusively for the management of the port and for the performance of the functions attributed to it by the law (see recital 55). (117) the court of justice of the european union (38) (the court of justice) has consistently defined undertakings as entities engaged in an economic activity, regardless of their legal status and the way in which they are financed. the court of justice has consistently held that any activity consisting in offering goods and services on a market is an economic activity (39). (118) the classification of a particular entity as an undertaking therefore depends entirely on the nature of its activities. this general principle has three important consequences: (i) the status of the entity under national law is not decisive, (ii) the application of the state aid rules as such does not depend on whether the entity is set up to generate profits, and (iii) the classification of an entity as an undertaking is always relative to a specific activity. (119) the measures at hand concern funding for the structural refurbishment of ship-repair infrastructure (dry-docks) located in a port that is owned by the italian state, which exercises its ownership rights through pan, acting as a manager. the commission finds that dry-docks are not port infrastructure but production facilities for shipyards to be used for shipbuilding or ship-repairing activities. it has been long held in the commission's decisional practice that shipbuilding is an economic activity involving trade between member states (40). (120) the dry-docks are commercially exploited by pan which charges land use fees for their use. in this respect, contrary to what the italian authorities claim (see recitals 57 and 58), those fees represent a compensation for the provision of an economic service (i.e. the leasing ship-repairing facilities for remuneration). the fees constitute one of the sources of income for pan allowing it to finance its activities, which include investments to maintain the dry-docks operational. by maintaining the dry-docks in an operational state to accommodate ship-repair, allows pan to avoid a reduction in its management activities in respect of the port and to attract ship repairers. in fact, without performing such works, the dry-docks could not be properly operated and, in the long term, pan would not be able to continue its business activity of leasing them for remuneration. in this respect, the 2004 concession specifies in art. 1 that the concession is granted for the purposes of carrying out ship and pleasure craft conversion and repair activities, as well as for the management of the dry-docks (41), thereby specifying in advance the exact use of the public land in question. (121) although it cannot be excluded that, given its public functions, pan may also perform activities in the public remit, the present decision only concerns the management of the aided dry-dock facilities and renting them out for remuneration. in accordance with established case-law, the classification of an entity as an undertaking is always relative to a specific activity. an entity that carries out both economic and non-economic activities is to be regarded as an undertaking only with regard to the former. therefore, the commission does not have to take a position on whether the remaining activities of pan (i.e. other than the renting of ship-repairing facilities against remuneration) constitute economic activities. 5.1.2. imputability and state resources (122) the resources granted for the investment projects have been transferred to pan from the state budget. as indicated in section 5.1.1, pan can be qualified as an undertaking for the purposes of the present decision, being an entity performing an economic activity on behalf of the owner, which is the italian state. therefore, that transfer amounts to a transfer of state resources and is imputable to the state. 5.1.3. selectivity (123) to be considered state aid, a measure must be specific or selective in that it favours only certain undertakings and/or the production of certain goods. (124) since the present case concerns the aid measures granted individually to pan, the existence of economic advantage leads to the presumption that the measures are selective (42). (125) in any event, the commission finds that the measures at stake favour pan as compared to other undertakings that are in a factual and legal situation comparable to that of pan. law 413/1998 provides that the ministry, following the requests from port authorities, shall issue a programme of investments. upon the request of pan, the programme of investments was adopted with two ministerial decrees (27 october 1999 and 2 may 2001) (see recital 25). even if a number of other port authorities listed in that programme of investment (43) were also able to use public funds to carry out investments in other italian ports, the commission finds that the measures selectively favour pan's shipbuilding facility. indeed, pan received state funding to expand, modernise and upgrade the shipbuilding facility it manages, as opposed to other managers of shipbuilding facilities not enlisted in the programme of investments, e.g. because they did not constitute port authorities. such non-enlisted managers of shipbuilding facilities are in a factual and legal situation comparable to pan, but they had to expand, modernise or upgrade the shipbuilding infrastructure without receiving that state funding. according to the court, neither a large number of eligible undertakings (which can even include all undertakings of a given sector), nor the diversity and size of the sectors to which they belong, provide grounds for concluding that a state measure constitutes a general measure of economic policy (44). finally, the commission notes that the measures are selective also because they favour a manager of shipbuilding and ship repair facilities in comparison to managers of manufacturing or repair facilities in other sectors of the economy. the latter are in a comparable factual and legal situation since they also exercise their economic activity on the basis of the manufacturing or repair facilities they manage. however, they have to pursue their economic activity without benefitting from the investment support granted to pan. 5.1.4. economic advantage (126) the public funding of eur 44 138 854,50 is provided through grants or repayments of loans contracted by pan with financial institutions as presented in table 2 above. a grant is a non-refundable financial instrument which bears no financing cost. similarly, repayment by the state of loans entered into by an undertaking which results in no financial costs being borne by that undertaking as beneficiary is not available under normal market conditions as it reliefs the undertaking from the financial obligations it would normally have to face. in the market, such financing instruments would not be available to the beneficiary. the public financing provided, therefore, confers an economic advantage on pan. (127) however, it follows from the altmark judgment that compensation granted by the state or through state resources to undertakings in consideration for psos imposed on them does not confer such an advantage on the undertakings concerned, and hence does not constitute state aid within the meaning of article 107(1) tfeu, provided four cumulative conditions are satisfied (45): first, the recipient undertaking is actually required to discharge psos and those obligations have been clearly defined. as the definition of the sgei is within the member states' competence, the commission's powers are, in principle, limited to checking whether the member state has made a manifest error when defining the service as an sgei. secondly, the parameters on the basis of which the compensation is calculated have been established beforehand in an objective and transparent manner. the need to establish the compensation parameters in advance does not mean that the compensation has to be calculated on the basis of a specific formula. rather, what matters is that it is clear from the outset how the compensation is to be determined. typically, the relevant act entrusting the psos must at least specify the content and duration of the psos, the undertaking and territory concerned, the parameters for calculating, controlling and reviewing the compensation, and the arrangements for avoiding and recovering any overcompensation. thirdly, the compensation does not exceed what is necessary to cover all or part of the costs incurred in discharging the public service obligations, taking into account the relevant receipts and a reasonable profit for discharging those obligations. fourthly, where the undertaking which is to discharge public service obligations is not chosen in a public procurement procedure, the level of compensation needed has been determined on the basis of an analysis of the costs which a typical undertaking, well run and adequately provided with means of transport so as to be able to meet the necessary public service requirements, would have incurred in discharging those obligations, taking into account the relevant receipts and a reasonable profit for discharging the obligations. (128) in this case (see recital 62), italy argued that article 1.g) of ministerial decree of 14 november 1994 imposed a pso on all italian port authorities. the commission will therefore assess whether all four altmark criteria are met. (129) according to the case-law (46), since the first altmark condition is designed to ensure transparency and legal certainty, it requires that two minimum criteria be met: (i) the undertaking must be actually entrusted with the implementation of public service obligations, and (ii) the nature, duration and scope of those obligations must be clearly defined. in the absence of a clear definition of such objective criteria, it is not possible to verify whether a particular activity may be covered by the concept of an sgei. those two minimum criteria are of strict application and they are not covered by the member states' wide discretion. therefore, the commission controls their fulfilment strictly and at this stage does not apply the manifest error test. that manifest error test is applied only at a subsequent stage, in order to control whether the actually entrusted and clearly defined services and obligations are suitable for designation as an sgei. it is only in that latter stage that the existence of a market failure can be relevant. (130) in the present case, the nature, duration and scope of the public service obligation allegedly entrusted to pan has not been clearly defined. contrary to what the italian authorities claim (see recital 63), the national law (article 1.g) of ministerial decree of 14 november 1994) describes only in very general terms the obligation imposed on all port authorities, which consists in the management of dry docks (gestione di ( ) bacini di carenaggio per il settore industriale), without further specifications. article 1.g does not define at all the duration of the alleged public service obligation. moreover, such generally phrased provision does not define in any clear manner the nature and scope of the obligation. (131) in any event, with respect to whether the alleged public service obligations are suitable for designation as an sgei, the commission finds that the italian authorities made a manifest error. the italian authorities have not provided evidence showing that pan, by renting ship-repairing facilities against remuneration, provides an activity which is not available in the market under comparable conditions of price, quality, continuity and access to the service. the commission considers that the existence of (or the possibility to build) other dry-docks and floating docks of the same size in the port of naples and other neighbouring ports can exclude the classification of the management of a specific dry-dock by the port authority as an sgei. in addition, the subsidised facilities do not provide any general benefit for society but rather a mere service to ship repairers in the area of naples (47). in enirisorse (48), the court confirmed that the operation of any commercial port does not automatically constitute the operation of a service of general economic interest. the commission consequently considers that the economic services provided by pan do not exhibit any special characteristics compared with the rental of ship-repairing facilities in the market (49) and do not address any market failure. (132) with respect to the second and third altmark conditions, the commission observes the following. the ministerial decree of 14 november 1994 does not provide any quantification or any objective and transparent parameters to calculate beforehand the compensation for the pso allegedly provided by pan. also the granting acts (see recital 125) do not specify further the alleged pso compensation. (133) therefore, it cannot be established whether any compensation granted does not exceed what is necessary to cover the relevant costs incurred in discharging the alleged pso, including a reasonable profit. (134) with respect to the fourth altmark condition, the commission notes that, according to italy, the pso was not and cannot be entrusted to pan via a public procurement procedure pursuant to italian law (see recital 66). (135) according to the altmark judgment, where the undertaking that is to discharge a pso is not chosen following a public procurement procedure to select a tenderer capable of providing these services at the least cost to the community, the level of compensation needed must be determined on the basis of an analysis of the costs which a typical undertaking, well-run and adequately provided with means to meet the pso, would have incurred in discharging those obligations, taking into account the relevant receipts and a reasonable profit for discharging the obligations. (136) the italian authorities have not provided any comprehensive analysis of the costs of such an undertaking that is adequately provided with means to discharge the alleged pso. neither have they indicated that such an analysis has been performed for the purpose of determining the methodology for the calculation of the compensation. (137) in view of the above, the commission finds that the four conditions are not cumulatively met; hence, the measures at hand entail an economic advantage. 5.1.5. distortion of competition and effect on trade (138) according to established case law, when financial support granted by a member state strengthens the position of an undertaking compared to other undertakings competing in intra-union trade, there is at least a potential effect on trade between member states and competition (50). (139) the commission notes italy's arguments that the under national law, the management of ports falls within the public remit and port authorities do not operate in a sector that is liberalised and open to competition and trade between member states. (140) as indicated in recitals 118 and 119, this investment project, by restoring the dry-docks to adequate conditions, will allow pan to continue the economic activity of renting out the dry-docks and thus improve its competitive position. although pan is active on an upstream market of renting shipbuilding/ship repair infrastructure, the fact that such infrastructure is subsidised and then used to provide shipbuilding and ship-repair services at the downstream level distorts competition and affects trade at eu union level. this is because the shipbuilding/ship-repair sector is open to competition and trade at union level. for that reason, sector specific rules applicable to shipbuilding set a framework for a possible public intervention in those facilities (51). moreover, pan competes against other managers that can rent shipbuilding/ship repair infrastructure in the union, and thus operates in a market that is open to competition and trade at union level. (141) therefore, the commission concludes that the measures in question are liable to distort competition and affect intra-union trade. 5.1.6. on the alleged violation of article 345 tfeu (142) the italian authorities claim that considering the measures as state aid would be a violation of article 345 tfeu setting out the principle of neutrality between private and public entities. a private owner could invest as much as he desires in ship-repairing facilities, while investments by the state on its own infrastructure would always be state aid. (143) the commission notes that the union legal order is neutral with regard to the system of property ownership and does not in any way prejudice the right of member states to act as economic operators. however, when public authorities directly or indirectly carry out economic transactions in any form (52), they are subject to union state aid rules. economic transactions carried out by public bodies (including public undertakings) do not confer an advantage on its counterpart, and therefore do not constitute aid, if they are carried out in line with normal market conditions (53). (144) the commission finds that in providing state funding to pan the italian state did not carry out the investment in compliance with the market economy investor principle. first of all, that principle is not applicable in a situation where a public authority presents itself as the organising and delegating authority of a public service. the applicability of that principle is necessarily ruled out, since by definition the member state is acting as a public authority in organising and delegating the alleged public service (54). secondly, even if the market economy investor principle were applicable, the commission considers that a private operator in the same sector would have prepared ex ante a business plan and would have carried out the investment only if it was profitable on that basis. other considerations (e.g. image enhancing, as mentioned by italy, see recital 69) could exceptionally be taken into account in the profitability analysis, but would have to be substantiated by objective evidence, which was not provided by the italian authorities. (145) as stated in the opening decision, the italian authorities presented a financial analysis based on the funding gap calculated as the difference between the discounted value of the expected operating profits of the investment and the discounted investment costs of the project. the results of this calculation show that over a reference period of 25 years the project has a negative financial net present value of eur 44 274 286,68. (146) therefore, the commission is of the view that by qualifying the measures as state aid there would be no violation of article 345 tfeu. 5.1.7. classification of the measures as existing aid (147) italy claims that the measures at issue constitute existing aid within the meaning of article 1(b)(v) of the procedural regulation, which defines existing aid as aid which is deemed to be an existing aid because it can be established that at the time it was put into effect it did not constitute an aid, and subsequently became an aid due to the evolution of the internal market and without having been altered by the member state. article 1(b)(v) further provides that [w]here certain measures become aid following the liberalisation of an activity by union law, such measures shall not be considered as existing aid after the date fixed for liberalisation. (148) the commission is of the view that the aid cannot be classified as existing aid as state support to shipbuilding and ship-repair facilities has always been considered state aid, even before the leipzig halle judgment (55). (149) the commission notes the arguments of italy that decision 94/374/ec on sicilian regional law, (quoted in the opening decision, see recital 74) does not support the conclusion that public support measures for ship-repair facilities at a dry-dock always fell within the scope of article 107(1) tfeu. however, the commission finds that this decision draws a clear distinction between the public support provided to the body responsible for the port administration (that was not classified as state aid) and the public support provided to the same public body for the maintenance work on the dry-dock (that was classified as state aid). in any event, the concept of state aid is an objective notion which is influenced only by whether a state measure confers an advantage on one or more particular undertakings, whereas that objective notion is not affected by the commission's decision-making practice (56). (150) therefore, the commission reiterates its conclusion that the measures at hand constituted state aid also prior to the leipzig halle judgment. 5.2. existence of aid to camed (151) since pan received and will continue to receive public support to fund the interventions agreed with camed, camed did not have to cover the entire investment costs like any other private operator of ship-repairing facilities in the market. the commission finds that by providing the dry-docks to camed below market rates italy granted a selective economic advantage in favour of camed. 5.2.1. imputability and state resources (152) since pan is a public entity that forms part of the state administration (even if it is considered as acting as a private undertaking, see recital 118), the commission finds that the measures are imputable to the state. in cases where a public authority grants aid to a beneficiary this transfer is imputable to the state, even if the body in question enjoys legal autonomy from other public authorities. (153) state resources include all resources of the public sector, including resources of intra-state entities (decentralised, federated, regional or other). in addition, waiving revenue which would otherwise have been paid to the state constitutes a transfer of state resources. if public authorities provide goods or services at a price below market rates, that implies a waiver of state resources (as well as the granting of an advantage). (154) therefore, the commission finds that by providing the dry-docks to camed below market rates, pan waived state resources. 5.2.2. selectivity (155) to be considered state aid, a measure must be specific or selective in that it favours only certain undertakings and/or the production of certain goods. italy claims that the measures have a general, cross-cutting scope, because in line with the public model under which the italian legislature has organised the ports sector, all undertakings (not just camed) operating in the port area in all italian ports (not just naples) and in all economic sectors (not just shipbuilding) have benefitted from aid that is identical to that which camed has allegedly enjoyed. the commission disagrees with this assessment for the reasons below. (156) first, since the concession contract was signed specifically with camed, the advantage is presumed to have been granted to camed in a selective manner. in individual aid measures, the existence of economic advantage leads to the presumption that the measure is selective (57). secondly, and in any event, the measures are selective because they favour camed in relation to other undertakings in a comparable legal and factual situation. as demonstrated in section 5.2.3 of the present decision, camed can operate the shipbuilding and ship repair facilities in the port of naples by paying only a small fraction of their cost. by contrast, other shipyards (in other ports or outside the area of ports), which operate non-state-owned facilities and thus fall outside the scope of ministerial decree no 595/1995, must in principle bear themselves the full cost of setting up their own shipbuilding and ship repair facilities, which they operate to provide such services. finally, the commission notes that the measures are selective also because they favour an operator of shipbuilding and ship repair facilities in comparison to operators of manufacturing or repair facilities in other sectors of the economy. the latter are in a comparable factual and legal situation since they also exercise their economic activity on the basis of the manufacturing or repair facilities they operate. however, contrary to camed, they have to pursue their economic activity without benefitting from below-cost rental prices for their facilities. 5.2.3. economic advantage (157) as regards camed, the commission notes that the concession contract was not granted by means of an open tender but rather through a different type of procedure where other operators could present observations or alternative proposals against an individual application for a concession (sort of opposition procedure, see recital 15). (158) the commission also notes that the fee paid by camed in accordance with the 2004 concession does not correspond to a market-conform fee. the land use fee paid by camed to the pan is calculated on the basis of fixed legal parameters and amounts to around eur 140 201,29 on average per year which for the concession period of 30 years would amount to around eur 4,2 million (58). that fee is determined on the basis of decree no 595 of 15 november 1995 and takes into account the number of square metres of the public area to which the concession relates multiplied by a unit amount in euros, which is increased yearly on the basis of coefficient expressed as a percentage. the unit amount in euros varies according to the activities covered by the concession. one of the activities referred to in that decree is shipyard activities (i.e. shipping repairs/conversions). however, the activity of managing dry-docks that was also entrusted upon camed on the basis of the concession is not mentioned in that decree. (159) the commission is of the view that the fee determined on the basis of the method above is merely a consideration for the occupation of state-owned property but does not take into account the actual subject and resulting economic value of the concession. specifically, the fee does not take into account the fact that the concession allows camed not only to carry out ship-repair activities, but also the sole management of the state-owned dry-docks. this allows camed to charge other port operators wishing to carry out repair work on those docks a fee (59). (160) moreover, the commission notes that according to the 2004 concession, camed undertook to carry out investments in the amount of eur 24 610 420. according to the italian authorities and camed, camed's investment programme in reality amounted to eur 42 541 495 million (see recitals 80 and 100). (161) the commission concludes that camed, as the manager and operator of the dry-docks (i.e. provider of ship-repair services) would be responsible for bearing the full costs of the renovation works. alternatively, if the renovated facilities are put at its disposal, camed would be required to pay a (concession) fee that reflects at least the value of the investment made by the italian state and pan for the renovations. this is because camed uses the subsidised infrastructure for its lifespan, therefore at the end of the concession period the state will retain only a limited residual value. (162) the commission notes that only part of camed's investments concern the renovation of the dry-docks (see recital 100). the remaining (major) part of the investments is directly incurred for the day-to-day operation and management of the facilities for which camed would in any event be responsible. (163) therefore, the investments in the amount of eur 42 million that camed carried out for its own benefit (i.e. to cover costs that it would anyway be responsible to bear) is an additional private investment on top of all public interventions mentioned in table 2 and cannot be considered as a contribution towards a market concession fee. neither the part of this amount (eur 11,1 million) carried out by camed for investments in docks (see recital 15) can be deemed as own contribution, since at the end of the concession contract no (or very minimal value) accrued to pan, due to amortisation of all assets. (164) furthermore, as stated in the opening decision, the commission had doubts whether a pso was imposed on camed in the context of the concession agreement. italy had argued prior to the opening decision that, since dry-docks are used by camed for the provision of sgei, any investment needed to provide that service represents a compensation for that service. (165) although after the opening decision italy did not claim anymore that a pso was imposed on camed, for the sake of completeness the commission assesses in the following recitals whether the four altmark conditions are cumulatively fulfilled with respect to the measures in support of camed. (166) regarding the first altmark condition, the minimum criteria mentioned in recital 129 are not fulfilled. specifically, the nature and scope of the public service obligation allegedly entrusted to camed has not been clearly defined. the obligation is defined in the concession by mere reference to the generally phrased provision of article 1.g of ministerial decree of 14 november 1994. therefore, although it could be argued that the duration of the obligation is defined through the 30 year duration of the concession, there is still no clear definition of the nature and scope of the alleged public service obligation for the reasons explained in recital 130 of the present decision. (167) in any event, with respect to whether the alleged public service obligations are suitable for designation as an sgei, the commission does not consider that camed is required to discharge obligations that can be defined as public service obligations. indeed, the service (management of dry docks) is already provided and can be provided satisfactorily by other undertakings operating under normal market conditions. the service does not exhibit any special characteristics compared with those of private owners of ship-repairing services and managers of such facilities and it does not address any market failure. the italian authorities have not provided evidence showing that camed provides an activity not provided in the market under comparable conditions of price, quality, continuity and access to the service. in addition, the subsidised facilities do not provide any general benefit for society but rather a mere service to ship owners in the area of naples (60). (168) regarding the second altmark condition, the 2004 concession does not explicitly provide any quantification or parameters established beforehand in an objective and transparent manner to calculate the amount of compensation that pan should pay to camed in exchange for the obligation to grant open access to the dry-dock to any other ship-repairers. the 2004 concession does not make any express link between that obligation and pan's commitment to perform the interventions at stake. also, the 2004 concession does not clearly identify the operating loss allegedly suffered by camed nor the amount of the interventions. (169) moreover, the commission notes that the funding of the interventions as a compensation to camed for the obligation to grant open access to the dry-docks cannot exclude the risk of overcompensation as required by the third altmark criterion. in fact, in the absence of any calculation or estimate of the operating loss allegedly incurred in discharging the pso, it does not appear possible to verify that the amount of investments granted for the interventions correspond to such operating loss, taking into account a reasonable profit. (170) regarding the fourth altmark condition, the land concession was awarded to camed without a public procurement procedure and italy never provided the necessary information to assess whether the amount of investments granted for the interventions corresponds to the level of costs of a typical, well-run undertaking which grants open access to the dry-docks to any other ship-repairers. (171) therefore, the commission finds that the four conditions are not cumulatively met; hence, the measures at hand entail an economic advantage to camed. 5.2.4. distortion of competition and effect on trade (172) ship-repairing represents an economic activity in a sector open to competition and trade at union level. therefore, any advantage granted to camed is liable to distort competition and affect intra-union trade. 5.2.5. classification of the measures as existing aid (173) for the reasons analysed in section 5.1.7 of this decision regarding pan, the commission also considers that the measures in favour of camed cannot be considered as existing aid. 5.3. compatibility (174) the commission finds that dry-docks are not transport infrastructures, but production facilities for shipyards as they are used for ship-building or ship-repairing and not for transport purposes. therefore, the commission is of the opinion that the measures cannot be assessed directly under article 107(3)(c) tfeu as investment aid for transport infrastructure, as the italian authorities claim (see recital 86). (175) the commission also finds that the aid cannot be assessed on the basis of article 107(2)(b) tfeu, concerning aid to make good the damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences. the commission notes that aid can be found compatible under that article only if very strict conditions are fulfilled, inter alia, that the aid only compensates for the damage directly caused by the event in question and does not result in overcompensation, which were not proved in this case (61). (176) therefore, the commission considers that the examination of the compatibility of the measures for pan and for camed should be conducted first under the communication from the commission european union framework for state aid in the form of public service compensation (2011 sgei framework) (62). (177) if the compatibility conditions set out in the 2011 sgei framework are not complied with, the commission is of the view that the examination of the compatibility of the measures granted to pan and camed could also be conducted under the state aid rules for the shipbuilding sector applicable at the time of the granting of each measure. (178) the commission finds that the date of grant of the individual aids to pan is not the date of entry into force of law no 413/1998, as italy claims (see recital 85). that law is too general and cannot confer on a beneficiary the legal right to receive the aid since it has not enumerated specific beneficiaries or the aid amounts (63). instead, the commission finds that the right to receive the aid in question derives from the ministerial decree of 27 december 1999, adopted within the scope of the general framework set by law 413/1998, read in conjunction with the ministerial decree of 2 may 2001, which are the effective implementing acts of the measure, as required by law no 413/1998. (179) pursuant to article 9 of law 413/1998, on the basis of a request by the relevant port authorities, article 1 of ministerial decree of 27 october 1999 provides for the adoption of an infrastructural works programme for the expansion, modernisation and redevelopment of ports and the allocation of resources set out in an annex thereto. according to that annex, the ministry was to make available to pan eur 51,403 million (italia lira 99,53 billion) for investment works for the dry docks in the port of naples. the amounts to be made available to all port infrastructural investment from 2001 until 2017 were set out in the annex to the ministerial decree of 2 may 2001, adopted also on the basis of law 413/1998. in respect of pan, this decree set the overall financing ceiling at eur 102 million (italian lira 197,5 billion). these decrees conferred on pan, inter alia, the right to obtain the repayment by the ministry of loans in respect of the port infrastructure projects set out in the annex to the ministerial decrees, including those relating to the dry docks at stake. these investments were already provided for at the time of the 2004 concession to camed and the concession itself refers to these investments already set out in the 2001 agreement. accordingly, the following compatibility base could be applicable for the shipbuilding aid (regional aid for investment in upgrading or modernising existing yards with the objective of improving the productivity of existing installations) to pan and camed: (1) regulation (ec) no 1540/98, which entered into force on 1 january 1999 until 31 december 2003; (2) the 2004 framework on state aid to shipbuilding, which was originally applicable from 1 january 2004 until 31 december 2006, and was later prolonged twice until 31 december 2008 and until 31 december 2011; (3) the 2011 framework on state aid to shipbuilding, which was applicable to non-notified aid granted after 31 december 2011. the application of this framework has been extended until 30 june 2014; (4) the guidelines on regional state aid for 2014-2020 as from 1 july 2014. (180) italy has argued that the above compatibility base for aid to shipbuilding should not be applied as such and that compatibility should instead be assessed directly on the basis of articles 107 tfeu, and in the light of other provisions of secondary law adopted in the sector of state aid (64). italy has mentioned the bombardments of the second world war, earthquakes, the development of the economy of an assisted region and the modernisation and development of port infrastructure. (181) according to the case-law, it is up to the member state to show that the circumstances of a national measure are different from those envisaged in the relevant guidelines, and thus that the commission should assess the measure directly under article 107(3) tfeu (65). to the extent that italy argues the bombardments of the second world war and earthquakes as a reason for deviating from the above guidelines, the commission has already explained in recital 175 why the conditions of article 107(2)(b) tfeu are anyway not fulfilled for the measures at issue. as regards the argument on modernisation and development of port infrastructure as a ground for assessing the measures directly under the treaty, the commission has also explained in recital 174 that dry-docks are not transport infrastructures and therefore they cannot be assessed directly under article 107(3)(c) tfeu. finally, as to italy's argument on the development of the economy of the relevant assisted region, the commission notes that such aid would not be assessed under the regional aid guidelines applicable at the time the measures were granted since aid to shipbuilding was governed by sectoral rules as presented in recital 176 a fact clearly acknowledged by each of the regional aid guidelines applicable at the time of granting the aid (66). it also makes sense that aid on shipbuilding assets is assessed under the specific sectoral rules on shipbuilding rather than on the basis of the more general regional aid rules, as only the sectoral guidelines can cover the specific features of the sector and therefore address in the best way the common objective pursued by the aid. 5.3.1. compatibility assessment of the aid to pan (182) one of the conditions to consider the aid compatible under the 2011 sgei framework is that the aid must be granted for a genuine and correctly defined sgei as referred to in article 106(2) tfeu. in addition, the sgei should be entrusted through an act specifying the psos and the methods of calculating compensation, and the amount of compensation must not exceed what is necessary to cover the net cost of discharging the psos, including a reasonable profit. (183) the arguments included in section 5.1.4 show that the commission finds that italy made a manifest error of appreciation in the definition of the public service imposed on pan. in addition, the relevant acts do not give any indication of the amount of compensation to be granted to pan for the management of dry-docks or how such compensation should be calculated and therefore do not allow to conclude on whether any compensation granted is limited to what is necessary to cover the relevant costs incurred in discharging the alleged pso. furthermore, as explained in recital 167, the nature, duration and scope of the alleged public service obligations of pan have not been clearly defined. (184) therefore, the commission is of the opinion that the measures do not comply with all compatibility conditions and thus cannot be declared compatible under the 2011 sgei framework with regard to the aid to pan. (185) the commission has also assessed whether the measures can be declared as compatible on the basis of the applicable shipbuilding rules. (186) the commission notes that, having regard to the granting acts of the aid (see recitals 25 and 179), the legal bases applicable to the various aid are the regulation (ec) no 1540/98 and the framework on state aid to shipbuilding, indicated as (i) and (ii) in recital 179 (67). the commission has verified below whether the conditions under each of the listed compatibility bases are respected. (187) in order to be eligible for aid under the shipbuilding rules, the aid must be granted for investments in upgrading or modernising existing yards, not linked to a financial restructuring of the yard(s) concerned, with the objective of improving the productivity of existing installations (excluding mere replacements of depreciated assets) (68). (188) the italian authorities stated (see recital 86) that the alleged aid is not designed to promote an increase in the productivity of the existing installations in a shipyard, but rather to carry out specific maintenance of certain items of port infrastructure that are the sole property of the italian state and to prevent them from becoming obsolete. the investments are therefore not eligible for aid under the shipbuilding rules. (189) furthermore, italy has not demonstrated that the aid has an incentive effect, i.e. that an aid application has been submitted before the date of the start of works or that the aid is limited to support eligible expenditure as defined in the applicable regional aid guidelines (see recital 89). (190) the public funding already granted for this project (eur 44 138 854,50, namely 76,42 % of the total investment costs) exceeds the maximum permissible aid intensity for regional investment aid for shipbuilding facilities under all three subsequent shipbuilding frameworks (which varied between 12,5 % and 22,5 % of the total investment costs depending on the regional aid status of the relevant region. (191) in view of the fact that the above-mentioned compatibility conditions are not fulfilled, the commission concludes that the aid measures in favour of pan are not compatible with the internal market. 5.3.2. compatibility assessment of the aid to camed (192) as demonstrated in section 5.2.3, italy made a manifest error of appreciation in the qualification if ship-repair services to camed as a pso. furthermore, the relevant acts do not give any indication of the amount of compensation to be granted to camed for the obligation to keep open access to the dry-docks and therefore do not allow to conclude on whether any compensation granted does not exceed what is necessary to cover the relevant costs incurred in discharging the pso. the commission notes that considering the funding of the interventions (in the amount of eur 44 138 854,50 provided by the italian state and eur 13 621 000 provided by the own resources of pan) as a compensation for the obligation imposed on camed to keep an open access to the dry-docks cannot exclude the risk of overcompensation (see recital 169). furthermore, as explained in recital 162, the nature and scope of the alleged public service obligations has not been clearly defined. (193) therefore, the commission concludes that the measures cannot be declared compatible under the 2011 sgei framework with regard to the alleged aid to camed. (194) as regards the compatibility of the aid to camed on the basis of the shipbuilding rules, the commission notes that camed as the manager and operator of the aided facilities benefited from operating aid (in the form of reduced concession fees) aimed at reducing the expenditure that camed would have to bear. the state aid rules for the shipbuilding sector applicable at the time of the granting of each measure (see recital 179) do not provide for operating aid to managers or users of shipbuilding facilities. therefore, the commission concludes that the aid to camed cannot be declared as compatible aid. 6. conclusion on the existence and compatibility of aid (195) the commission finds that italy has unlawfully put into effect investment aid to pan in breach of article 108(3) tfeu. (196) the commission also finds that italy has unlawfully put into effect operating aid to camed in breach of article 108(3) tfeu. (197) since no grounds can be identified for finding the measures to be compatible with the internal market, they must be held to be incompatible. 7. recovery 7.1. limitation period (198) the commission notes that according to the italian authorities, the public support under assessment cannot be recovered as the statute of limitations established by article 17 of the procedural regulation has expired. (199) article 17(1) states that the powers of the commission to recover aid shall be subject to a limitation period of 10 years. however, according to article 17(2): the limitation period shall begin on the day on which the unlawful aid is awarded to the beneficiary either as individual aid or as aid under an aid scheme. any action taken by the commission or by a member state, acting at the request of the commission, with regard to the unlawful aid shall interrupt the limitation period. each interruption shall start time running afresh. the limitation period shall be suspended for as long as the decision of the commission is the subject of proceedings pending before the court of justice of the european union. (200) the commission takes the view that the arguments of the italian authorities cannot be accepted. indeed, the commission's actions in sending a request for information in march 2006, two preliminary assessment letters to the complainant in 2013 and 2014 and requests for further information to the italian authorities (see recitals 3, 5 and 6) interrupted the limitation period and therefore the statute of limitations period of 10 years has not expired. 7.2. legitimate expectations and legal certainty (201) pursuant to article 16(1) of the procedural regulation, any aid found to be incompatible with the internal market must be recovered. (202) article 16(1) provides, however, that [t]he commission shall not require recovery of the aid if this would be contrary to a general principle of union law. in this respect, the court of justice established that the commission is required to take into consideration on its own initiative exceptional circumstances that provide justification, pursuant to article 16(1), for it to refrain from ordering the recovery of unlawfully granted aid where such recovery is contrary to a general principle of union law (69). (203) the commission notes that italy and camed put forward in their comments to the opening decision the argument that the commission's decision is unlawful and represents a breach of the general principles of sound administration, legal certainty and legitimate expectations (see recitals 52-54 and 91). (204) according to the case-law of the court of justice, the right to rely on the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations presupposes that precise, unconditional and consistent assurances originating from authorised, reliable sources have been given to the person concerned by the competent authorities of the union (70). these assurances, according to the case-law, can be either explicit (e.g. direct communication to member state on the validity of a certain measure) (71) or implicit (e.g. undue delay in the proceedings, approval of similar schemes in the past) (72). a legitimate expectation that the aid granted is lawful cannot, barring exceptional circumstances, be entertained unless the aid has been granted in compliance with the notification requirements of article 108 tfeu (73). (205) the commission finds that there is no breach of the principle of legitimate expectation in the case at hand. indeed, as explained in recitals 147 to 150, the aid was never notified to the commission by the italian authorities. furthermore, the commission has not given any precise, unconditional and consistent assurances about the measure being no-aid or compatible aid (74). (206) the fundamental requirement of legal certainty, also covered by article 16 of the procedural regulation, is designed to ensure the foreseeability of legal situations and relationships governed by union law and hence has the effect of preventing the commission from indefinitely delaying the exercise of its powers (75). (207) the commission is of the opinion, in the light of the highly specific circumstances of this case, that the principle of legal certainty has not been taken proper account of vis- -vis the italian authorities. (208) the commission finds that there is a body of evidence to suggest, (i), that the commission delayed exercising its powers when it came to examining the measures at issue and, (ii), that the implicit indication given by the commission to the italian authorities before the reopening of the file in 2013 could have misled them as to the lawfulness of those measures (76). (209) firstly, the commission delayed exercising its powers when it came to examining the measures at issue: the commission sent a request for information in march 2006, to which italy replied on 3 april 2006 providing exhaustive information which should have led the commission to conclude that the measure under scrutiny was in fact public support. nevertheless, the commission services did not follow up that letter by any means and furthermore the file was closed. the file was reopened only seven years later, after a formal complaint in february 2013. the opening decision was issued ultimately in june 2016. (210) secondly, the implicit indication given by the commission to the italian authorities before the reopening of the file in 2013 could have misled those authorities as to its lawfulness. by their letter dated 3 april 2006, the italian authorities claimed that the dry docks at stake were public infrastructure and as such, not subject to shipbuilding guidelines. nevertheless, the information which the italian authorities provided to the commission should have led the commission to conclude that the measure under scrutiny was in fact public support to shipbuilding and ship-repair facilities that constituted state aid, which ought to have been notified to the commission. so, even if the commission was made aware of the nature of the aided investment project, it did not take any further actions or undertake any further investigation during the 2006-2013 period, giving italy the implicit signal that their characterisation of dry docks as port infrastructure was correct. (211) the seven years which elapsed between the reply from the italian authorities to the commission's letter and the further request for information sent by the commission to italy, could have led italy in this specific case to assume that, due to commission's silence, italy's original position, according to which the measure fell outside the remit of state aid control and hence no notification was required, had been implicitly endorsed by the commission. while it is true that, in principle, the absence of a reaction by the commission to the answer of a member state cannot, in itself, constitute an infringement of the principle of legal certainty, it is nevertheless clear that this particular case does not merely involve inaction on the part of the commission, but also an implicit indication given by the commission services to italy, resulting in an exceptional combination of circumstances. consequently, (i) the seven-year delay in the initial commission's decision-making process (by not following up the initial letter of the italian authorities dated 3 april 2006), in combination with (ii) the commission's inaction that, in the specific circumstances of the present case, could have been interpreted as a tacit acceptance of the italian authorities' position concerning the identification and interpretation of the legal framework for the assessment of the measure, could have left room for doubt as to the lawfulness of the measures and prevented the italian authorities from taking steps to bring the measures concerned in line with state aid rules in a timely fashion. (212) therefore, on the basis of the specific circumstances of the present case and of the elements above taken together, in order to ensure the foreseeability of legal situations and relationships governed by union law, the commission concludes that the specific circumstances of the present case mean that italy shall not be required to recover any incompatible aid referred to in section 5 in favour of pan or camed that was granted before the request for information sent by the commission to italy on 28 february 2013, by which the present case has been reopened. (213) as regards the aid granted after 28 february 2013, any incompatible aid is recoverable from its recipients. indeed, the commission finds that after the detailed request for information were sent on 28 february 2013, the italian authorities were fully informed of the commission's doubts regarding the lawfulness and compatibility of the aid. (214) however, as noted in recital 178 above, the commission finds that all the measures at stake were granted to pan before 28 february 2013, the date of the request for information sent by the commission to italy after the 2013 formal complaint. camed was also granted all the measures at stake prior to 28 february 2013, since it obtained the legal right to receive the aid by virtue of the 2004 concession agreement. therefore, none of the aid measures that have been the subject-matter of the present case was granted after 28 february 2013. 7.3. aid to be recovered from pan and camed (215) in the light of the specific circumstances presented in this case, as explained in recitals 207 to 211 and the conclusion in recital 214, italy shall not recover any amount from either pan or camed. for the same reasons, the present decision does not preclude future payments concerning the specific amounts of aid that were already granted to pan (by virtue of the ministerial decree of 27 october 1999, adopted within the scope of the general framework set out in law 413/1998, read in conjunction with the ministerial decree of 2 may 2001) and to camed (by virtue of the 2004 concession agreement) prior to 28 february 2013. (216) nevertheless, should italy contemplate the granting of other aid measures in the port of naples, italy would obviously be obliged under article 108(3) tfeu to notify such measures to the commission for assessment of their compatibility with the internal market (except, of course, if such measures are block-exempted from notification), has adopted this decision: article 1 (1) the state aid in the form of investment aid from italy in favour of pan granted through the ministerial decree of 27 october 1999, adopted within the scope of the general framework set out in law 413/1998, read in conjunction with the ministerial decree of 2 may 2001, unlawfully put into effect by italy in breach of article 108(3) of the treaty on the functioning of the european union, is incompatible with the internal market. (2) the state aid in the form of unduly low concession fees from the port authority of naples in favour of camed, unlawfully put into effect by italy through the 2004 concession agreement signed by camed and pan on 29 july 2004, in breach of article 108(3) of the treaty on the functioning of the european union, is incompatible with the internal market. article 2 italy is not obliged to recover the aid referred to in article 1. article 3 this decision is addressed to the italian republic. done at brussels, 20 september 2018. for the commission margrethe vestager member of the commission (1) oj c 369, 7.10.2016, p. 78. (2) council regulation (ec) no 659/1999 of 22 march 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of article 108 of the treaty on the functioning of the european union (oj l 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1). that regulation has been replaced by council regulation (eu) 2015/1589 of 13 july 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of article 108 of the treaty on the functioning of the european union (oj l 248, 24.9.2015, p. 9). (3) cf. footnote 1. (4) regolamento per l'esercizio dei bacini di carenaggio, http://porto.napoli.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/regolamentobacini.pdf. (5) the latest modification of the regulation occurred in 2012, http://porto.napoli.it/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/ordinanza_n.6_03-04-2012.pdf. (6) the italian authorities explained that the company undertook a number of corporate transformations and changed name several times. for the sake of simplicity, the decision uses the name camed to refer to the company, even if in the past it was called differently (bacini napoletani s.p.a.). (7) agreement (convenzione) between the port authority of naples and bacini napoletani s.p.a. (i.e. camed) of 12 june 2001. according to the 2001 agreement, camed has been operating dry-dock 3 at least since 1959. (8) article 36 of the naval code (codice navale) and article 18 of the naval code regulation (regolamento per l' esecuzione del codice della navigazione marittima). (9) the amount of investment specified in the 2004 concession is indeed eur 24 million and not eur 24 000 as stated in the opening decision. (10) the complainant referred, inter alia, to the commission decision in state aid case no sa.34940 (n/2012) - italy - port of augusta of 19 december 2012 (oj c 77, 15.3.2013, p. 1). (11) per la realizzazione di opere infrastrutturali di amplimento, ammodernamento e riqualificazione dei porti, il ministero dei trasporti e della navigazione adotta un programma sulla base delle richieste delle autorit portuali o, laddove non istituite, delle autorit marittime, sentite le regioni interessate. (12) decreto 27 ottobre 1999 adozione del programma di opere infrastrutturali di ampliamento, ammodernamento e riqualificazione dei porti. (gu serie generale n.10 del 14-01-2000). (13) decreto 2 maggio 2001 ripartizione delle risorse di cui all'art. 9 della legge n. 413 del 1998, rifinanziate dall'art. 54, comma 1, della legge n. 488 del 1999 e dall'art. 144, comma 1, della legge n. 388 del 2000 per la realizzazione di opere infrastrutturali di ampliamento, l'ammodernamento e riqualificazione dei porti. (gu serie generale n.199 del 28-08-2001). (14) additional funding was later granted also by means of article 54, paragraph 1, of law no 488/1999, article 144, paragraph 1, of law no 388/2000 and article 36 of law no 166/2002. (15) council regulation (ec) no 1540/98 of 29 june 1998 establishing new rules on aid to shipbuilding (oj l 202, 18.7.1998, p. 1). (16) oj c 317, 30.12.2003, p. 11. see also commission communication concerning the prolongation of the framework on state aid to shipbuilding (oj c 260, 28.10.2006, p. 7) and the communication from the commission concerning the prolongation of the framework on state aid to shipbuilding (oj c 173, 8.7.2008, p. 3). (17) oj c 364, 14.12.2011, p. 9. (18) see communication from the commission concerning the prolongation of the application of the framework on state aid to shipbuilding (oj c 357, 6.12.2013, p. 1). (19) oj c 209, 23.7.2013, p. 1. (20) see judgment in case c-222/92, sfei ecli:eu:c:1994:396. (21) see judgment in case t-156/94, aristrain v commission ecli:eu:t:1999:53. (22) see judgment in case c-362/09 p, athina ki techniki v commission ecli:eu:c:2010:783. (23) see legge 28 gennaio 1994, n. 84: riordino della legislazione in materia portuale, gazzetta ufficiale n.28 del 4-2-1994 supplemento ordinario n. 21. (24) under this law, the main functions of italian port authorities are: (a) programming, coordination and promotion of the commercial and industrial activities carried out in the port; (b) maintenance of open access to infrastructures and spaces; (c) entrustment to third parties and control of port activities aimed at providing services of general interest to port users for money. (25) the italian authorities refer to the judgement in case t-128/98 a roports de paris v. commission ecli:eu:t:2000:290. according to italy, the possibility of freely setting the amount of the fee requested from potential users by a manager of infrastructure is a necessary and indispensable precondition for classifying the fee as commercial and the activity as economic. (26) according to italy, within the framework of the national plan for upgrading italian ports, through the adoption of law no 413/1998, the national authorities have allocated funds for carrying out infrastructure work to expand, modernise and upgrade ports, authorising the port authorities to invest in infrastructure works in ports a total amount of approximately eur 50 million annually. (27) under article 5 of law no 84/1994 and article 104 of legislative decree no 112/1998, the economic burden of carrying out specific restructuring works on publicly owned infrastructure, of which it is the sole owner, falls solely upon the italian state. (28) the concession was awarded pursuant to article 36 of the naval code (codice navale) and article 18 of the naval code regulation (regolamento per l' esecuzione del codice della navigazione marittima). (29) commission notice on the notion of state aid as referred to in article 107(1) of the treaty on the functioning of the european union (oj c 262, 19.7.2016, p. 1). (30) italy notes that the a roports de paris judgment described the management of airports and not the construction of infrastructure as an economic activity. thus it is necessary to at least refer to the leipzig halle judgment. the italian authorities continue to argue against the transposition of this judgment to the port sector, since there is a very great risk that applying it would draw member states' entire economic and industrial policy in the port sector within the scope of state aid rules, having an effect on the relative spheres of responsibility of the union and of member states in a manner detrimental to member states. (31) commission decision 94/374/ec of 2 february 1994 on sicilian regional law no 23/1991 concerning extraordinary assistance for industry and article 5 of sicilian regional law no 8/1991 concerning, in particular, financing for sitas (oj l 170, 5.7.1994, p. 36). (32) the italian authorities have also provided examples of similar situations where other concessionaires active in the port of naples have signed similar agreements, under which works carried out on various items of infrastructure have been financed by the port authority. specifically, the italian authorities refer to a concession contract signed by the port authority with the complainant in this case for the pursuit of shipbuilding activities in the port of naples, where (routine) maintenance work is the responsibility of the concessionaire, while the port authority has agreed to finance the construction of a new dock (specific work). (33) the italian authorities explained that especially at local level in application of law no 413/1998, the port authority of naples has carried out a number of measures, using public funds to refurbish and modernise a large number of state-owned assets and pieces of infrastructure, used by undertakings operating in all economic sectors and not only by shipbuilding firms and provided specific examples. (34) directive 2014/23/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 26 february 2014 on the award of concession contracts (oj l 94, 28.3.2014, p. 1). (35) commission decision of 19 december 2012, sa.34940 port of augusta (oj c 77, 15.3.2013, p. 1). (36) law no 84/1994, the italian framework law on ports. (37) decree of the minister for transport and shipping no 595 of 15 november 1995, in consultation with the treasury minister for finance, entitled regulation laying down rules for the establishment of the fees for maritime public concessions in guri no 158 of 8 july 1996. (38) see e.g. judgment in case c-41/90 hofner et elsner v macrotron ecli:eu:c:1991:161, para. 21; judgment in case c-160/91 poucet and pistre v agf and cancava ecli:eu:c:1993:63, para. 17; judgment in case c-35/96 commission v. italy ecli:eu:c:1998:303. (39) see judgment in case 118/85 commission v italy ecli:eu:c:1987:283, para. 7; judgment in case c- 35/96 commission v italy ecli:eu:c:1998:303, para. 36; judgment in joined cases c-180/98 to c-184/98 pavlov and others ecli:eu:c:2000:428, para. 75. (40) see for example commission decision of 12 may 2004 on the state aid implemented by spain for further restructuring aid to the public shipyards, state aid case c 40/00 (ex nn 61/00) (2005/173/ec). (41) la concessione assentita allo scopo di esercitarvi un cantiere di transformazioni e riparazioni di navi e/o imbarcazioni da diporto nonch per la gestione dei bacini di carenaggio in muratura (42) judgment in case t-314/15 greece v commission ecli:eu:t:2017:903, para. 79. (43) the programme of 27 october 1999 lists 20 ports benefitting from the national funding and the programme of 2 may 2001 further enlarges that list (to 25 ports). (44) see for instance judgment in case c-75/97 belgium v commission ecli:eu:c:1999:311, para. 32; judgment in case c-143/99 adria-wien pipeline et wietersdorfer & peggauer zementwerke ecli:eu:c:2001:598, para. 48. (45) see judgment in case c-280/00 altmark trans v regierungsprasidium magdeburg ecli:eu:c:2003:415, paras 87-88. (46) judgment in joined cases c-66/16 p to c-69/16 p comunidad aut noma del pa s vasco and itelazpi v commission ecli:eu:c:2017:999, paras 72, 73 and 75; see also the opinion of advocate-general wathelet in joined cases c-66/16 p to c-69/16 p comunidad aut noma del pa s vasco and itelazpi v commission ecli:eu:c:2017:654, paras 112, 114-117 and 121-122. (47) see the 2011 sgei communication, paragraph 50. (48) judgment in joined cases c-34/01 to c-38/01 enirisorse ecli:eu:c:2003:640, para. 33. (49) see communication c (2011) 9404 final on the application the european union state aid rules to compensation granted for the provision of services of general economic interest, of 20 december 2011 (the 2011 sgei communication), paragraph 45. (50) see e.g. judgment in case 730/79 philip morris v commission ecli:eu:c:1980:209, para. 11 and judgment in case c-372/97 italy v commission ecli:eu:c:2004:234, para. 44. (51) see commission decision of 12 may 2004 on the state aid implemented by spain for further restructuring aid to the public spanish shipyards; state aid case c 40/00 (ex nn 61/00), (2005/173/ec). (52) see, for instance judgment in case 40/85 belgium v commission ecli:eu:c:1986:305, para. 12. (53) judgment in case c-39/94 sfei and others ecli:eu:c:1996:285, para. 60-61. (54) judgment in case t-454/13 sncm v commission ecli:eu:t:2017:134, para. 233. (55) see e.g. decision 94/374/ec. (56) judgment in case t-445/05 associazione italiana del risparmio gestito fineco asset management v commission ecli:eu:t:2009:50, para. 145. (57) judgment in case t-314/15 greece v commission ecli:eu:t:2017:903, para. 79. (58) this figure results from the extrapolation over a period of the 30 years of the average concession fee that camed already paid for the period 2004-2017. (59) in particular, the fee paid by other port operators to camed covers: (i) the use of the dry-docks and (ii) the provision by camed of associated services such as entry, exit and maintenance of vessel in the dock, supply of electricity, compressed air, dock crane, monitoring and environmental safety. (60) see the 2011 sgei communication, paragraph 50. (61) commission decision sa.39622 (2014/n), republic of slovenia aid to make good the damage caused by glaze ice in slovenia in january and february 2014 (all sectors except agriculture, forestry, fisheries and aquaculture). (62) oj c 8, 11.1.2012, p. 15. (63) see judgment in case c-245/16 nerea ecli:eu:c:2017:521, para. 32. (64) here italy refers to notice no 2003/c 317/06 (oj c 317, 30.12.2003, p. 11) and in particular to paragraph 12 which states that aid to shipbuilding may be granted in accordance with articles [107 and 108 tfeu] and all legislation and measures adopted on those bases. (65) case c-431/14 p greece v commission ecli:eu:c:2016:145, paragraphs 70-72. (66) see point 8 (and footnote 9) of the guidelines on national regional aid for 2007-2013 (oj c 54, 4.3.2006, p. 13): ( ) some other sectors [transport and shipbuilding] are also subject to specific rules which take account of the particular situation of the sectors concerned and which may totally or partially derogate from these guidelines, see point 2 of the guidelines on national regional aid (2000-2006) (oj c 74, 10.3.1998, p. 9): in addition, some of the sectors they cover are also governed by rules aimed specifically at the sectors in question. (67) see (i) regulation (ec) no 1540/98, which entered into force on 1 january 1999 until 31 december 2003; (ii) the 2004 framework on state aid to shipbuilding, which was originally applicable from 1 january 2004 until 31 december 2006, and was later prolonged twice until 31 december 2008 and until 31 december 2011. (68) see article 7 of regulation (ec) no 1540/98; paragraph 26 of the framework on state aid to shipbuiling of 2003; recital 13 of framework on state aid to shipbuilding of 2011; see also commission decision on c21/2006 (ex n 635/2005) to be implemented by the slovak republic for slovense lodenice komarno, 2007/529/ec (69) judgment in case 223/85 rsv v commission ecli:eu:c:1987:502. (70) judgment in case c-537/08 p kahla thuringen porzellan ecli:eu:c:2010:769, para. 63 and case-law cited. (71) judgment in case 267/85 van den bergh en jurgens v commission ecli:eu:c:1987:121, para. 44. (72) judgment in case 223/85 rsv v commission ecli:eu:c:1987:502. (73) judgment in joined cases c-630/11 p to c-633/11 p hga srl and others ecli:eu:c:2013:387, para. 134. (74) see, on the definition of the principle of legitimate expectation, the judgments of the court of justice in cases 265/85 van den bergh en jurgens v commission ecli:eu:c:1987:121, para. 44, and c-152/88 sofrimport v commission ecli:eu:c:1990:259, para. 26; judgments of the court of first instance in cases t-290/97 mehibas dordtselaan v commission ecli:eu:t:2000:8, para. 59, and t- 223/00 kyowa hakko kogyo v commission ecli:eu:t:2003:194, para. 51; see, on the absence of a legitimate expectation on the part of recipients of aid unlawfully implemented, the judgment of the court of justice in joined cases c-183/02 p and c-187/02 p demesa and territorio hist rico de lava v commission ecli:eu:c:2004:701, paras 44 and 45, and the case law cited therein. (75) see the judgment of the court of justice in joined cases c-74/00 p and c-75/00 p falck and acciaierie di bolzano v commission ecli:eu:c:2002:524, para. 140. (76) see commission decision 2007/256/ec of 20 december 2006 on the aid scheme implemented by france under article 39 ca of the general tax code state aid c 46/2004 (ex nn 65/2004) (oj l 112, 30.4.2007, p. 41) and judgment in case c-408/04 p commission v salzgitter ecli:eu:c:2008:236, para. 106.

name: council decision (eu) 2019/448 of 18 march 2019 on the submission, on behalf of the european union, of a proposal for the listing of methoxychlor in annex a to the stockholm convention on persistent organic pollutants type: decision subject matter: deterioration of the environment; health; environmental policy; international affairs; chemistry date published: 2019-03-20 20.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 77/74 council decision (eu) 2019/448 of 18 march 2019 on the submission, on behalf of the european union, of a proposal for the listing of methoxychlor in annex a to the stockholm convention on persistent organic pollutants the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 192(1), in conjunction with article 218(9) thereof, having regard to the proposal from the european commission, whereas: (1) on 14 october 2004 the stockholm convention on persistent organic pollutants (the convention) was concluded by the european community by means of council decision 2006/507/ec (1). (2) as a party to the convention, the union may submit proposals for the amendment of the annexes to the convention. annex a to the convention lists chemicals to be eliminated, annex b lists chemicals to be restricted and annex c lists chemicals the releases of which from unintentional production are to be reduced or eliminated. (3) according to available scientific information and review reports, and taking due account of the screening criteria set out in annex d to the convention, methoxychlor exhibits characteristics of a persistent organic pollutant. (4) methoxychlor is not approved as an active substance pursuant to regulation (ec) no 1107/2009 of the european parliament and of the council (2) and is therefore not allowed to be placed on the market or used in the union in plant protection products. methoxychlor is also not approved as an active substance pursuant to regulation (eu) no 528/2012 of the european parliament and of the council (3) and is therefore not allowed to be placed on the market or used in the union in biocidal products. moreover, methoxychlor is not registered in accordance with regulation (ec) no 1907/2006 of the european parliament and of the council (4) and, consequently, it is not allowed to be manufactured or placed on the market in the union in quantities of 1 tonne or more per year per manufacturer or importer. (5) although methoxychlor was phased out in the union many years ago, it may still be used as a pesticide and dispersed in the environment outside the union, which may be the reason why it is detected in the environment. due to the potential for long-range environmental transport of methoxychlor, the measures taken nationally or at union level are not sufficient to safeguard a high level of protection of the environment and human health, and wider international action is necessary. (6) the union should therefore submit a proposal to the secretariat of the convention for the listing of methoxychlor in annex a to the convention, has adopted this decision: article 1 the union shall submit a proposal for the listing of methoxychlor (cas no: 72-43-5, ec no 200-779-9) in annex a to the stockholm convention on persistent organic pollutants (the convention). the commission, on behalf of the union, shall communicate the proposal referred to in the first subparagraph to the secretariat of the convention with all the information required under annex d to the convention. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at brussels, 18 march 2019. for the council the president p. daea (1) council decision 2006/507/ec of 14 october 2004 concerning the conclusion, on behalf of the european community, of the stockholm convention on persistent organic pollutants (oj l 209, 31.7.2006, p. 1). (2) regulation (ec) no 1107/2009 of the european parliament and of the council of 21 october 2009 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market and repealing council directives 79/117/eec and 91/414/eec (oj l 309, 24.11.2009, p. 1). (3) regulation (eu) no 528/2012 of the european parliament and of the council of 22 may 2012 concerning the making available on the market and use of biocidal products (oj l 167, 27.6.2012, p. 1). (4) regulation (ec) no 1907/2006 of the european parliament and of the council of 18 december 2006 concerning the registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals (reach), establishing a european chemicals agency, amending directive 1999/45/ec and repealing council regulation (eec) no 793/93 and commission regulation (ec) no 1488/94 as well as council directive 76/769/eec and commission directives 91/155/eec, 93/67/eec, 93/105/ec and 2000/21/ec (oj l 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1).

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/451 of 19 march 2019 on the harmonised standards for construction products drafted in support of regulation (eu) no 305/2011 of the european parliament and of the council (text with eea relevance.) type: decision_impl subject matter: technology and technical regulations; building and public works; european organisations date published: 2019-03-20 20.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 77/80 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/451 of 19 march 2019 on the harmonised standards for construction products drafted in support of regulation (eu) no 305/2011 of the european parliament and of the council (text with eea relevance) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to regulation (eu) no 305/2011 of the european parliament and of the council of 9 march 2011 laying down harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products and repealing council directive 89/106/eec (1), and in particular article 17(5) thereof, whereas: (1) in accordance with regulation (eu) no 305/2011 manufacturers are to use the methods and the criteria provided in harmonised standards, the references of which have been published in the official journal of the european union, for assessing the performance of construction products covered by those standards in relation to their essential characteristics. (2) by letters m/109 of 29 august 1996, m/130 of 29 january 1999, m/139 of 26 june 2001, m/122 of 14 december 1998 and m/135 of 5 may 2000, the commission made requests to the european committee for standardization (cen) for the drafting of harmonised standards in support of council directive 89/106/eec (2) (mandates). the references of harmonised standards drafted on the basis of mandates are published in the official journal of the european union (3). (3) the mandates allow revision of the harmonised standards drafted on their basis. in order to take account of the technical developments as well as requirements of regulation (eu) no 305/2011, cen revised several of those harmonised standards. in particular, cen revised the harmonised standards for the following products: fire detection and fire alarm systems, fibre-cement slates and fittings, glass in building and fibre-cement flat sheets. (4) the commission has assessed whether the harmonised standards revised by cen are in conformity with the relevant mandates and regulation (eu) no 305/2011. (5) the harmonised standards revised by cen are in conformity with the relevant mandates and regulation (eu) no 305/2011. it is therefore appropriate to publish the references of those standards in the official journal of the european union. (6) in accordance with article 17(5) of regulation (eu) no 305/2011, a coexistence period is to be indicated for each harmonised standard that supersedes another harmonised standard. such coexistence period has been indicated for the standard en 15824:2017 on external renders and internal plasters based on organic binders published in the official journal of the european union (4). given that this period is not sufficiently long for the manufacturers to prepare for the use of the standard, it is necessary to indicate a new coexistence period for it. (7) in order to allow the manufacturers to use the revised harmonised standards as soon as possible, this decision should enter into force on the day of its publication in the official journal of the european union, has adopted this decision: article 1 the references of the harmonised standards for construction products drafted in support of regulation (eu) no 305/2011 that are listed in annex i to this decision are hereby published in the official journal of the european union. article 2 the references of the harmonised standards for construction products drafted in support of regulation (eu) no 305/2011 that are listed in annex ii to this decision are hereby published in the official journal of the european union with a new coexistence period of those standards. article 3 this decision shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at brussels, 19 march 2019. for the commission the president jean-claude juncker (1) oj l 88, 4.4.2011, p. 5. (2) council directive 89/106/eec of 21 december 1988 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states relating to construction products (oj l 40, 11.2.1989, p. 12). (3) oj c 92, 9.3.2018, p. 139. (4) oj c 92, 9.3.2018, p. 139. annex i no reference to the standard reference to the superseded standard beginning of the coexistence period (dd.mm.yyyy.) end of the coexistence period (dd.mm.yyyy.) 1. en 54-5:2017+a1:2018 fire detection and fire alarm systems part 5: heat detectors point heat detectors en 54-5:2000 fire detection and fire alarm systems part 5: heat detectors point detectors en 54-5:2000/a1:2002 xx.yy.2019 31.8.2022 2. en 54-7:2018 fire detection and fire alarm systems part 7: smoke detectors point smoke detectors that operate using scattered light, transmitted light or ionization en 54-7:2000 fire detection and fire alarm systems part 7: smoke detectors point detectors using scattered light, transmitted light or ionization en 54-7:2000/a1:2002 en 54-7:2000/a2:2006 xx.yy.2019 31.8.2022 3. en 492:2012+a2:2018 fibre-cement slates and fittings product specification and test methods en 492:2012 fibre-cement slates and fittings product specification and test methods xx.yy.2019 xx.yy.2020 4. en 1096-4:2018 glass in building coated glass part 4: product standard en 1096-4:2004 glass in building coated glass part 4: evaluation of conformity/product standard xx.yy.2019 xx.yy.2020 5. en 1279-5:2018 glass in building insulating glass units part 5: product standard en 1279-5:2005+a2:2010 glass in building insulating glass units part 5: evaluation of conformity xx.yy.2019 xx.yy.2020 6. en 12467:2012+a2:2018 fibre-cement flat sheets product specification and test methods en 12467:2012 fibre-cement flat sheets product specification and test methods xx.yy.2019 xx.yy.2020 annex ii no reference to the standard reference to the superseded standard beginning of the coexistence period (dd.mm.yyyy.) end of the coexistence period (dd.mm.yyyy.) 1. en 15824:2017 specifications for external renders and internal plasters based on organic binders en 15824:2009 specifications for external renders and internal plasters based on organic binders 9.3.2018 9.3.2020

name: council decision (eu) 2019/433 of 20 february 2018 on the position to be taken on behalf of the european union within the association committee meeting in trade configuration established by the association agreement between the european union and the european atomic energy community and their member states, of the one part, and the republic of moldova, of the other part, concerning the update of annexes xxviii-a (rules applicable to financial services), xxviii-b (rules applicable to telecommunication services) and xxviii-d (rules applicable to international maritime transport) to the agreement type: decision subject matter: communications; european construction; financial institutions and credit; europe; organisation of transport; international affairs; maritime and inland waterway transport date published: 2019-03-19 19.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 75/72 council decision (eu) 2019/433 of 20 february 2018 on the position to be taken on behalf of the european union within the association committee meeting in trade configuration established by the association agreement between the european union and the european atomic energy community and their member states, of the one part, and the republic of moldova, of the other part, concerning the update of annexes xxviii-a (rules applicable to financial services), xxviii-b (rules applicable to telecommunication services) and xxviii-d (rules applicable to international maritime transport) to the agreement the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 91, article 100(2) and the first subparagraph of article 207(4), in conjunction with article 218(9) thereof, having regard to the proposal from the european commission, whereas: (1) the association agreement between the european union and the european atomic energy community, and their member states of the one part, and the republic of moldova, of the other part (the agreement) was concluded, on behalf of the union, in accordance with council decision (eu) 2016/839 (1) and entered into force on 1 july 2016. (2) several union acts listed in annexes xxviii-a (rules applicable to financial services), xxviii-b (rules applicable to telecommunication services) and xxviii-d (rules applicable to international maritime transport) to the agreement (the annexes) have been amended or repealed since the conclusion of negotiations of the agreement in june 2013. therefore, in order to ensure proper approximation of the legislation of the republic of moldova to the eu acts, a number of acts that implement, amend, supplement or replace the acts listed in those annexes should be added thereto, and certain deadlines should be amended to take into account the progress already made to date by the republic of moldova in the process of that approximation. (3) pursuant to the decision no 3/2014 of the eu-republic of moldova association council (2), the association committee meeting in trade configuration (the committee) may update or amend certain annexes to the agreement. (4) the committee is to adopt decisions updating the annexes. such decisions are binding upon the union. (5) it is appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the union's behalf in the committee, concerning the update of the annexes. (6) the position of the union within the committee should therefore be based on the attached draft decisions, has adopted this decision: article 1 the position to be taken on the union's behalf within the committee shall be based on the following draft decisions attached to this decision: (a) decision of the eu-republic of moldova association committee meeting in trade configuration concerning the update of annex xxviii-a (rules applicable to financial services) to the agreement; (b) decision of the eu-republic of moldova association committee meeting in trade configuration concerning the update of annex xxviii-b (rules applicable to telecommunication services) to the agreement; (c) decision of the eu-republic of moldova association committee meeting in trade configuration concerning the update of annex xxviii-d (rules applicable to international maritime transport) to the agreement. article 2 this decision is addressed to the commission. done at brussels, 20 february 2018. for the council the president v. goranov (1) council decision (eu) 2016/839 of 23 may 2016 on the conclusion, on behalf of the european union, of the association agreement between the european union and the european atomic energy community and their member states, of the one part, and the republic of moldova, of the other part (oj l 141, 28.5.2016, p. 28). (2) decision no 3/2014 of the eu-republic of moldova association council of 16 december 2014 on the delegation of certain powers by the association council to the association committee in trade configuration (oj l 110, 29.4.2015, p. 40). draft decision no / of the eu-republic of moldova association committee meeting in trade configuration of 2018 concerning the update of annex xxviii-a (rules applicable to financial services) to the association agreement between the european union and the european atomic energy community and their member states of the one part, and the republic of moldova, of the other part the association committee, having regard to the association agreement between the european union and the european atomic energy community and their member states, of the one part, and the republic of moldova, of the other part, signed in brussels on 27 june 2014, and in particular articles 61, 249, 436, 438 and 449 thereof, whereas: (1) the association agreement between the european union and the european atomic energy community and their member states of the one part, and the republic of moldova, of the other part (the agreement) entered into force on 1 july 2016. (2) articles 61 and 249 of the agreement provide that the republic of moldova is to carry out approximation of its legislation to the eu acts and international instruments (the union acquis) referred to in annex xxviii-a (rules applicable to financial services) to the agreement (annex xxviii-a). (3) the union acquis referred to in annex xxviii-a concerning money laundering has evolved since the conclusion of negotiations of the agreement in june 2013. in particular, the union adopted and notified to the republic of moldova directive (eu) 2015/849 of the european parliament and of the council (1) and regulation (eu) 2015/847 of the european parliament and of the council (2). (4) the republic of moldova continues the process of approximating its legislation to the union acquis, in accordance with the timelines and priorities set out in annex xxviii-a. it is therefore necessary to update annex xxviii-a in order to ensure that the evolution of the union acquis listed therein with respect to money laundering is promptly and efficiently integrated in the ongoing process of approximation, in accordance with article 449 of the agreement. (5) directive (eu) 2015/849 and regulation (eu) 2015/847 should therefore be added to the list set out in annex xxviii-a. (6) directive 2005/60/ec of the european parliament and of the council (3) and commission directive 2006/70/ec (4) should be removed from the list set out in annex xxviii-a with effect from 26 june 2017. (7) article 436(3) of the agreement provides that the eu-republic of moldova association council (the association council) is to have the power to update or amend the annexes to the agreement. (8) pursuant to article 438(2) of the agreement, the association council may delegate to the association committee any of its powers, including the power to take binding decisions. (9) by decision no 3/2014 (5) the association council delegated the power to update or amend the annexes to the agreement which relate, inter alia, to chapter 6 (establishment, trade in services and electronic commerce) of title v (trade and trade-related matters) of the agreement to the association committee meeting in trade configuration, to the extent that there are no specific provisions in chapter 6 relating to the update or the amendment of those annexes. there are no specific provisions in chapter 6 relating to the update or the amendment of the annexes. (10) annex xxviii-a should therefore be updated accordingly, has adopted this decision: article 1 annex xxviii-a (rules applicable to financial services) to the agreement is replaced by the annex to this decision. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at , for the association committee the chair (1) directive (eu) 2015/849 of the european parliament and of the council of 20 may 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending regulation (eu) no 648/2012 of the european parliament and of the council, and repealing directive 2005/60/ec of the european parliament and of the council and commission directive 2006/70/ec (oj eu l 141, 5.6.2015, p. 73). (2) regulation (eu) 2015/847 of the european parliament and of the council of 20 may 2015 on information accompanying transfers of funds and repealing regulation (ec) no 1781/2006 (oj eu l 141, 5.6.2015, p. 1). (3) directive 2005/60/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 26 october 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing (oj eu l 309, 25.11.2005, p. 15). (4) commission directive 2006/70/ec of 1 august 2006 laying down implementing measures for directive 2005/60/ec of the european parliament and of the council as regards the definition of politically exposed person and the technical criteria for simplified customer due diligence procedures and for exemption on grounds of a financial activity conducted on an occasional or very limited basis (oj eu l 214, 4.8.2006, p. 29). (5) decision no 3/2014 of the eu-republic of moldova association council of 16 december 2014 on the delegation of certain powers by the association council to the association committee in trade configuration (oj l 110, 29.4.2015, p. 40). annex annex xxviii-a rules applicable to financial services the republic of moldova undertakes to gradually approximate its legislation to the following eu acts and international instruments within the stipulated timeframes. directive 2007/44/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 5 september 2007 amending council directive 92/49/eec and directives 2002/83/ec, 2004/39/ec, 2005/68/ec and 2006/48/ec as regards procedural rules and evaluation criteria for the prudential assessment of acquisitions and increase of holdings in the financial sector timetable: the provisions of directive 2007/44/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2002/87/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 16 december 2002 on the supplementary supervision of credit institutions, insurance undertakings and investment firms in a financial conglomerate and amending council directives 73/239/eec, 79/267/eec, 92/49/eec, 92/96/eec, 93/6/eec and 93/22/eec, and directives 98/78/ec and 2000/12/ec of the european parliament and of the council timetable: the provisions of directive 2002/87/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2006/48/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 14 june 2006 relating to the taking up and pursuit of the business of credit institutions the savings and credit associations of the republic of moldova shall be treated in the same way as the institutions listed in article 2 of that directive and accordingly be exempt from the scope of that directive timetable: the provisions of directive 2006/48/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission directive 2007/18/ec of 27 march 2007 amending directive 2006/48/ec of the european parliament and of the council as regards the exclusion or inclusion of certain institutions from its scope of application and the treatment of exposures to multilateral development banks timetable: the provisions of directive 2007/18/ec shall be implemented upon entry into force of this agreement. directive 2006/49/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 14 june 2006 on the capital adequacy of investment firms and credit institutions timetable: the provisions of directive 2006/49/ec, with the exception as set out below, shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. with regard to institutions other than credit institutions defined in point (a) of article 3(1) of that directive, the provisions related to the level of required initial capital as set out in article 5(1) and (3), article 6, points (a), (b) and (c) of article 7, points (a), (b) and (c) of article 8 and article 9 of that directive shall be implemented within 10 years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2009/110/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 16 september 2009 on the taking up, pursuit and prudential supervision of the business of electronic money institutions amending directives 2005/60/ec and 2006/48/ec and repealing directive 2000/46/ec timetable: the provisions of directive 2009/110/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 94/19/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 30 may 1994 on deposit-guarantee schemes timetable: the provisions of directive 94/19/ec, with the exception of the provision related to the minimum level of compensation for each depositor set out in article 7 of that directive, shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. the provision related to the minimum level of compensation for each depositor set out in article 7 of that directive shall be implemented within 10 years of the entry into force of this agreement. council directive 86/635/eec of 8 december 1986 on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of banks and other financial institutions timetable: the provisions of directive 86/635/eec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2001/65/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 27 september 2001 amending directives 78/660/eec, 83/349/eec and 86/635/eec as regards the valuation rules for the annual and consolidated accounts of certain types of companies as well as of banks and other financial institutions timetable: the provisions of directive 2001/65/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2003/51/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 18 june 2003 amending directives 78/660/eec, 83/349/eec, 86/635/eec and 91/674/eec on the annual and consolidated accounts of certain types of companies, banks and other financial institutions and insurance undertakings timetable: the provisions of directive 2003/51/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2006/46/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 14 june 2006 amending council directives 78/660/eec on the annual accounts of certain types of companies, 83/349/eec on consolidated accounts, 86/635/eec on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of banks and other financial institutions and 91/674/eec on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of insurance undertakings timetable: the provisions of directive 2006/46/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2001/24/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 4 april 2001 on the reorganisation and winding up of credit institutions timetable: the provisions of directive 2001/24/ec shall be implemented upon entry into force of this agreement. directive 2009/138/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 25 november 2009 on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of insurance and reinsurance (solvency ii) timetable: the provisions of directive 2009/138/ec shall be implemented within seven years of the entry into force of this agreement. council directive 91/674/eec of 19 december 1991 on the annual accounts and consolidated accounts of insurance undertakings timetable: the provisions of directive 91/674/eec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission recommendation of 18 december 1991 on insurance intermediaries (92/48/eec) timetable: not applicable. directive 2002/92/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 9 december 2002 on insurance mediation timetable: the provisions of directive 2002/92/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2009/103/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 16 september 2009 relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability timetable: the provisions of directive 2009/103/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2003/41/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 3 june 2003 on the activities and supervision of institutions for occupational retirement provision timetable: the provisions of directive 2003/41/ec shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2004/39/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 21 april 2004 on markets in financial instruments amending council directives 85/611/eec and 93/6/eec and directive 2000/12/ec of the european parliament and of the council and repealing council directive 93/22/eec timetable: the provisions of directive 2004/39/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission directive 2006/73/ec of 10 august 2006 implementing directive 2004/39/ec of the european parliament and of the council as regards organisational requirements and operating conditions for investment firms and defined terms for the purposes of that directive timetable: the provisions of directive 2006/73/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission regulation (ec) no 1287/2006 of 10 august 2006 implementing directive 2004/39/ec of the european parliament and of the council as regards record-keeping obligations for investment firms, transaction reporting, market transparency, admission of financial instruments to trading, and defined terms for the purposes of that directive timetable: the provisions of regulation (ec) no 1287/2006 shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2003/71/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 4 november 2003 on the prospectus to be published when securities are offered to the public or admitted to trading and amending directive 2001/34/ec timetable: the provisions of directive 2003/71/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission regulation (ec) no 809/2004 of 29 april 2004 implementing directive 2003/71/ec of the european parliament and of the council as regards information contained in prospectuses as well as the format, incorporation by reference and publication of such prospectuses and dissemination of advertisements timetable: the provisions of regulation (ec) no 809/2004 shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2004/109/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 15 december 2004 on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market and amending directive 2001/34/ec timetable: the provisions of directive 2004/109/ec shall be implemented within four years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission directive 2007/14/ec of 8 march 2007 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of certain provisions of directive 2004/109/ec on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market timetable: the provisions of directive 2007/14/ec shall be implemented within four years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 97/9/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 3 march 1997 on investor-compensation schemes timetable: the provisions of directive 97/9/ec, with the exception of the provision related to the minimum level of compensation for each investor set out in article 4 of that directive, shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. the provisions of that directive related to the minimum level of compensation for each investor set out in article 4 of that directive shall be implemented within 10 years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2003/6/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 28 january 2003 on insider dealing and market manipulation (market abuse) timetable: the provisions of directive 2003/6/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission directive 2004/72/ec of 29 april 2004 implementing directive 2003/6/ec of the european parliament and of the council as regards accepted market practices, the definition of inside information in relation to derivatives on commodities, the drawing up of lists of insiders, the notification of managers' transactions and the notification of suspicious transactions timetable: the provisions of directive 2004/72/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission directive 2003/124/ec of 22 december 2003 implementing directive 2003/6/ec of the european parliament and of the council as regards the definition and public disclosure of inside information and the definition of market manipulation timetable: the provisions of directive 2003/124/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission directive 2003/125/ec of 22 december 2003 implementing directive 2003/6/ec of the european parliament and of the council as regards the fair presentation of investment recommendations and the disclosure of conflicts of interest timetable: the provisions of directive 2003/125/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission regulation (ec) no 2273/2003 of 22 december 2003 implementing directive 2003/6/ec of the european parliament and of the council as regards exemptions for buy-back programmes and stabilisation of financial instruments timetable: the provisions of regulation (ec) no 2273/2003 shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. regulation (ec) no 1060/2009 of the european parliament and of the council of 16 september 2009 on credit rating agencies timetable: that regulation's the provisions of regulation (ec) no 1060/2009 shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2009/65/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 13 july 2009 on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (ucits) timetable: the provisions of directive 2009/65/ec shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission directive 2007/16/ec of 19 march 2007 implementing council directive 85/611/eec on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (ucits) as regards the clarification of certain definitions timetable: the provisions of directive 2007/16/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2002/47/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 6 june 2002 on financial collateral arrangements timetable: provisions of directive 2002/47/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 98/26/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 19 may 1998 on settlement finality in payment and securities settlement systems timetable: the provisions of directive 98/26/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2009/44/ec of the european parliament and the council of 6 may 2009 amending directive 98/26/ec on settlement finality in payment and securities settlement systems and directive 2002/47/ec on financial collateral arrangements as regards linked systems and credit claims timetable: the provisions of directive 2009/44/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2007/64/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 13 november 2007 on payment services in the internal market amending directives 97/7/ec, 2002/65/ec, 2005/60/ec and 2006/48/ec and repealing directive 97/5/ec timetable: the provisions of directive 2007/64/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. regulation (ec) no 1781/2006 of the european parliament and of the council of 15 november 2006 on information on the payer accompanying transfers of funds timetable: the provisions of regulation (ec) no 1781/2006 shall be implemented within one year of the entry into force of this agreement. directive (eu) 2015/849 of the european parliament and of the council of 20 may 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending regulation (eu) no 648/2012 of the european parliament and of the council, and repealing directive 2005/60/ec of the european parliament and of the council and commission directive 2006/70/ec timetable: the provisions of directive (eu) 2015/849 shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. regulation (eu) 2015/847 of the european parliament and of the council of 20 may 2015 on information accompanying transfers of funds and repealing regulation (ec) no 1781/2006 timetable: the provisions of regulation (eu) 2015/847 shall be implemented within one year of the entry into force of this agreement. draft decision no / of the eu-republic of moldova association committee meeting in trade configuration of 2018 concerning the update of annex xxviii-b (rules applicable to telecommunication services) to the association agreement between the european union and the european atomic energy community and their member states of the one part, and the republic of moldova, of the other part the association committee, having regard to the association agreement between the european union and the european atomic energy community and their member states, of the one part, and the republic of moldova, of the other part, signed in brussels on 27 june 2014, and in particular articles 102, 240, 436, 438 and 449 thereof, whereas: (1) the association agreement between the european union and the european atomic energy community and their member states of the one part, and the republic of moldova, of the other part (the agreement), entered into force on 1 july 2016. (2) articles 102 and 240 of the agreement provide that the republic of moldova is to carry out approximation of its legislation to the eu acts and international instruments (union acquis) referred to in annex xxviii-b (rules applicable to telecommunication services) to the agreement (annex xxviii-b). (3) the union acquis referred to in annex xxviii-b has evolved since the conclusion of negotiations of the agreement in june 2013. in particular, the union adopted the following acts that implement, amend, supplement or replace the acts listed in annex xxviii-b: (i) regulation (eu) 2015/2120 of the european parliament and of the council of 25 november 2015 laying down measures concerning open internet access and amending directive 2002/22/ec on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services and regulation (eu) no 531/2012 on roaming on public mobile communications networks within the union (1); (ii) commission implementing decision 2014/276/eu of 2 may 2014 amending decision 2008/411/ec on the harmonisation of the 3 400-3 800 mhz frequency band for terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communications services in the community (2); (iii) commission implementing decision 2013/752/eu of 11 december 2013 amending decision 2006/771/ec on harmonisation of the radio spectrum for use by short-range devices and repealing decision 2005/928/ec (3); (iv) commission implementing decision 2014/641/eu of 1 september 2014 on harmonised technical conditions of radio spectrum use by wireless audio programme making and special events equipment in the union (4); (v) commission implementing decision 2014/702/eu of 7 october 2014 amending decision 2007/131/ec on allowing the use of the radio spectrum for equipment using ultra-wideband technology in a harmonised manner in the community (5); (vi) commission implementing decision (eu) 2016/339 of 8 march 2016 on the harmonisation of the 2 010-2 025 mhz frequency band for portable or mobile wireless video links and cordless cameras used for programme making and special events (6); (vii) commission implementing decision (eu) 2015/750 of 8 may 2015 on the harmonisation of the 1 452-1 492 mhz frequency band for terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communications services in the union (7); (viii) directive 2014/53/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 16 april 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the member states relating to the making available on the market of radio equipment and repealing directive 1999/5/ec (8); (ix) regulation (eu) no 910/2014 of the european parliament and of the council of 23 july 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing directive 1999/93/ec (9); (x) commission implementing regulation no (eu) 2015/806 of 22 may 2015 laying down specifications relating to the form of the eu trust mark for qualified trust services (10); (xi) commission implementing decision (eu) 2015/1505 of 8 september 2015 laying down technical specifications and formats relating to trusted lists pursuant to article 22(5) of regulation (eu) no 910/2014 of the european parliament and of the council on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market (11); (xii) commission implementing decision (eu) 2015/1506 of 8 september 2015 laying down specifications relating to formats of advanced electronic signatures and advanced seals to be recognised by public sector bodies pursuant to articles 27(5) and 37(5) of regulation (eu) no 910/2014 of the european parliament and of the council on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market (12); (xiii) commission implementing decision (eu) 2016/650 of 25 april 2016 laying down standards for the security assessment of qualified signature and seal creation devices pursuant to articles 30(3) and 39(2) of regulation (eu) no 910/2014 of the european parliament and of the council on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market (13); (xiv) commission decision 2010/267/eu of 6 may 2010 on harmonised technical conditions of use in the 790-862 mhz frequency band for terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communications services in the european union (14); commission implementing decision 2011/251/eu of 18 april 2011 amending decision 2009/766/ec on the harmonisation of the 900 mhz and 1 800 mhz frequency bands for terrestrial systems capable of providing pan-european electronic communications services in the community (15); commission decision 2009/766/ec of 16 october 2009 on the harmonisation of the 900 mhz and 1 800 mhz frequency bands for terrestrial systems capable of providing pan-european electronic communications services in the community (16), as amended by implementing decision 2011/251/eu; (xv) commission implementing decision 2012/688/eu of 5 november 2012 on the harmonisation of the frequency bands 1 920-1 980 mhz and 2 110-2 170 mhz for terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communications services in the union (17); (xvi) commission decision 2008/477/ec of 13 june 2008 on the harmonisation of the 2 500-2 690 mhz frequency band for terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communications services in the community; (18) (xvii) commission decision 2008/411/ec of 21 may 2008 on the harmonisation of the 3 400 - 3 800 mhz frequency band for terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communications services in the community (19); (xviii) commission decision 2008/671/ec of 5 august 2008 on the harmonised use of radio spectrum in the 5 875 5 905 mhz frequency band for safety-related applications of intelligent transport systems (its) (20); (xix) commission decision 2007/344/ec of 16 may 2007 on harmonised availability of information regarding spectrum use within the community (21); (xx) commission decision 2007/90/ec of 12 february 2007 amending decision 2005/513/ec on the harmonised use of radio spectrum in the 5 ghz frequency band for the implementation of wireless access systems including radio local area networks (was/rlans) (22); (xxi) commission decision 2005/513/ec of 11 july 2005 on the harmonised use of radio spectrum in the 5 ghz frequency band for the implementation of wireless access systems including radio local area networks (was/rlans) (23); (xxii) commission implementing decision 2011/829/eu of 8 december 2011 amending decision 2006/771/ec on harmonisation of the radio spectrum for use by short-range devices (24); (xxiii) commission decision 2010/368/eu of 30 june 2010 amending decision 2006/771/ec on harmonisation of the radio spectrum for use by short-range devices (25); (xxiv) commission decision 2009/381/ec of 13 may 2009 amending decision 2006/771/ec on harmonisation of the radio spectrum for use by short-range devices (26) (xxv) commission decision 2008/432/ec of 23 may 2008 amending decision 2006/771/ec on harmonisation of the radio spectrum for use by short-range devices (27); (xxvi) commission decision 2006/771/ec of 9 november 2006 on harmonisation of the radio spectrum for use by short-range devices (28); (xxvii) commission decision 2010/166/eu of 19 march 2010 on harmonised conditions of use of radio spectrum for mobile communication services on board vessels (mcv services) in the european union (29); (xxviii) commission decision 2006/804/ec of 23 november 2006 on harmonisation of the radio spectrum for radio frequency identification (rfid) devices operating in the ultra-high frequency (uhf) band (30); (xxix) commission implementing decision 2011/485/eu of 29 july 2011 amending decision 2005/50/ec on the harmonisation of the 24 ghz range radio spectrum band for the time-limited use by automotive short-range radar equipment in the community (31); (xxx) commission decision 2005/50/ec of 17 january 2005 on the harmonisation of the 24 ghz range radio spectrum band for the time-limited use by automotive short-range radar equipment in the community (32); (xxxi) commission decision 2004/545/ec of 8 july 2004 on the harmonisation of radio spectrum in the 79 ghz range for the use of automotive short-range radar equipment in the community (33); (xxxii) commission decision 2009/343/ec of 21 april 2009 amending decision 2007/131/ec on allowing the use of the radio spectrum for equipment using ultra-wideband technology in a harmonised manner in the community (34); (xxxiii) commission decision 2007/131/ec of 21 february 2007 on allowing the use of the radio spectrum for equipment using ultra-wideband technology in a harmonised manner in the community (35); (xxxiv) commission decision 2007/98/ec of 14 february 2007 on the harmonised use of radio spectrum in the 2 ghz frequency bands for the implementation of systems providing mobile satellite services (36); (xxxv) commission implementing decision 2013/654/eu of 12 november 2013 amending commission decision 2008/294/ec to include additional access technologies and frequency bands for mobile communications services on aircraft (mca services) (37); (xxxvi) directive 2013/37/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 26 june 2013 amending directive 2003/98/ec on the re-use of public sector information (38). (4) the republic of moldova continues the process of approximating its legislation to the union acquis, in accordance with the timelines and priorities set out in annex xxviii-b. in order to ensure proper approximation of the legislation of the republic of moldova to the union acquis, the acts listed under recital (3) should be added to the list set out in annex xxviii-b, and certain deadlines should be amended to take into account the progress already made to date by the republic of moldova in the process of that approximation, in accordance with article 449 of the agreement. (5) article 436(3) of the agreement provides that the eu-republic of moldova association council (the association council) is to have the power to update or amend the annexes to the agreement. (6) pursuant to article 438(2) of the agreement, the association council may delegate to the association committee any of its powers, including the power to take binding decisions. (7) by decision no 3/2014 (39) the association council delegated the power to update or amend the annexes to the agreement which relate, inter alia, to chapter 6 (establishment, trade in services and electronic commerce) of title v (trade and trade-related matters) of the agreement to the association committee meeting in trade configuration, to the extent that there are no specific provisions in chapter 6 relating to the update or the amendment of those annexes. there are no specific provisions in chapter 6 relating to the update or the amendment of the annexes. (8) annex xxviii-b should therefore be updated accordingly, has adopted this decision: article 1 annex xxviii-b (rules applicable to telecommunication services) to the agreement is replaced by the annex to this decision. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at , for the association committee the chair (1) oj eu l 310, 26.11.2015, p. 1. (2) oj eu l 139, 14.5.2014, p. 18. (3) oj eu l 334, 13.12.2013, p. 17. (4) oj eu l 263, 3.9.2014, p. 29. (5) oj eu l 293, 9.10.2014, p. 48. (6) oj eu l 63, 10.3.2016, p. 5. (7) oj eu l 119, 12.5.2015, p. 27. (8) oj eu l 153, 22.5.2014, p. 62. (9) oj eu l 257, 28.8.2014, p. 73. (10) oj eu l 128, 23.5.2015, p. 13. (11) oj eu l 235, 9.9.2015, p. 26. (12) oj eu l 235, 9.9.2015, p. 37. (13) oj eu l 109, 26.4.2016, p. 40. (14) oj eu l 117, 11.5.2010, p. 95. (15) oj eu l 106, 27.4.2011, p. 9. (16) oj eu l 274, 20.10.2009, p. 32. (17) oj eu l 307, 7.11.2012, p. 84. (18) oj eu l 163, 24.6.2008, p. 37. (19) oj eu l 144, 4.6.2008, p. 77. (20) oj eu l 220, 15.8.2008, p. 24. (21) oj eu l 129, 17.5.2007, p. 67. (22) oj eu l 41, 13.2.2007, p. 10. (23) oj eu l 187, 19.7.2005, p. 22. (24) oj eu l 329, 13.12.2011, p. 10. (25) oj eu l 166, 1.7.2010, p. 33. (26) oj eu l 119, 14.5.2009, p. 32. (27) oj eu l 151, 11.6.2008, p. 49. (28) oj eu l 312, 11.11.2006, p. 66. (29) oj eu l 72, 20.3.2010, p. 38. (30) oj eu l 329, 25.11.2006, p. 64. (31) oj eu l 198, 30.7.2011, p. 71. (32) oj eu l 21, 25.1.2005, p. 15. (33) oj eu l 241, 13.7.2004, p. 66. (34) oj eu l 105, 25.4.2009, p. 9. (35) oj eu l 55, 23.2.2007, p. 33. (36) oj eu l 43, 15.2.2007, p. 32. (37) oj eu l 303, 14.11.2013, p. 48. (38) oj eu l 175, 27.6.2013, p. 1. (39) decision no 3/2014 of the eu-republic of moldova association council of 16 december 2014 on the delegation of certain powers by the association council to the association committee in trade configuration (oj eu l 110, 29.4.2015, p. 40). annex annex xxviii-b rules applicable to telecommunication services the republic of moldova undertakes to gradually approximate its legislation to the following eu acts and international instruments within the stipulated timeframes. directive 2002/21/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 7 march 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (framework directive), as amended by directive 2009/140/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 25 november 2009 the following provisions of directive 2002/21/ec shall apply: strengthening the independence and administrative capacity of the national regulator in the field of electronic communications; establishing public consultation procedures for new regulatory measures; establishing effective mechanisms for appeal against the decisions of the national regulator in the field of electronic communications; and defining the relevant product and service markets in the electronic communications sector that are susceptible to ex ante regulation and analysing those markets with a view to determining whether significant market power (smp) exists on them. timetable: those provisions of directive 2002/21/ec shall be implemented within one and a half years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2002/20/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 7 march 2002 on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and services (authorisation directive), as amended by directive 2009/140/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 25 november 2009 the following provisions of directive 2002/20/ec shall apply: implementing a regulation providing for general authorisations and restricting the need for individual licences to specific, duly justified cases. timetable: those provisions of directive 2002/20/ec shall be implemented within two years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2002/19/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 7 march 2002 on access to, and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities (access directive), as amended by directive 2009/140/ec of the european parliament and of the council based on the markt analysis carried out in accordance with the framework directive, the national regulator in the field of electronic communications shall impose on operators found to have significant market power (smp) on the relevant markets appropriate regulatory obligations with regard to: access to, and use of, specific network facilities; price controls on access and interconnection charges, including obligations for cost-orientation; and transparency, non-discrimination and accounting separation. timetable: those provisions of directive 2002/19/ec shall be implemented within one and a half years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2002/22/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 7 march 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (universal service directive), as amended by directive 2009/136/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 25 november 2009 and regulation (eu) 2015/2120 of the european parliament and of the council the following provisions of directive 2002/22/ec shall apply: implementing regulation on universal service obligations (uso), including the establishment of mechanisms for costing and financing; and ensuring the respect of users' interests and rights, in particular by introducing number portability and the single european emergency call number 112. timetable: those provisions of directive 2002/22/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. regulation (eu) 2015/2120 of the european parliament and of the council of 25 november 2015 laying down measures concerning open internet access and amending directive 2002/22/ec on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic communications networks and services and regulation (eu) no 531/2012 on roaming on public mobile communications networks within the union timetable: the provisions of regulation (eu) 2015/2120 shall be implemented within four years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission directive 2002/77/ec of 16 september 2002 on competition in the markets for electronic communications networks and services timetable: the measures resulting from the operation of directive 2002/77/ec shall be implemented within one and a half years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2002/58/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 12 july 2002 concerning the processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector (directive on privacy and electronic communications), as amended by directive 2009/136/ec of the european parliament and of the council the following provisions of directive 2002/58/ec shall apply: implementing regulation to ensure protection of fundamental rights and freedoms, in particular the right to privacy, with respect to the processing of personal data in the electronic communication sector and ensuring the free movement of such data and of electronic communication equipment and services. timetable: those provision of directive 2002/58/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. decision no 676/2002/ec of th european parliament and of the council of 7 march 2002 on a regulatory framework for radio spectrum policy in the european community (radio spectrum decision) the following provisions of decision no 676/2002/ec shall apply: adopting a policy and regulation ensuring the harmonised availability and efficient use of the radio spectrum. timetable: the measures resulting from the operation of decision no 676/2002/ec shall be implemented within two years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission decision 2010/267/eu of 6 may 2010 on harmonised technical conditions of use in the 790-862 mhz frequency band for terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communications services in the european union timetable: the provisions of decision 2010/267/eu shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission implementing decision 2011/251/eu of 18 april 2011 amending commission decision 2009/766/ec on the harmonisation of the 900 mhz and 1800 mhz frequency bands for terrestrial systems capable of providing pan-european electronic communications services in the community timetable: the provisions of implementing decision 2011/251/eu shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission decision 2009/766/ec of 16 october 2009 on the harmonisation of the 900 mhz and 1 800 mhz frequency bands for terrestrial systems capable of providing pan-european electronic communications services in the community, as amended by commission implementing decision 2011/251/eu timetable: the provisions of decision 2009/766/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission implementing decision 2012/688/eu of 5 november 2012 on the harmonisation of the frequency bands 1 920-1 980 mhz and 2 110-2 170 mhz for terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communications services in the union timetable: the provisions of implementing decision 2012/688/eu shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission decision 2008/477/ec of 13 june 2008 on the harmonisation of the 2 500-2 690 mhz frequency band for terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communications services in the community timetable: the provisions of decision 2008/477/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission implementing decision 2014/276/eu of 2 may 2014 amending decision 2008/411/ec on the harmonisation of the 3 400-3 800 mhz frequency band for terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communications services in the community timetable: the provisions of implementing decision 2014/276/eu shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission decision 2008/411/ec of 21 may 2008 on the harmonisation of the 3 400 - 3 800 mhz frequency band for terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communications services in the community, as amended by commission implementing decision 2014/276/eu timetable: the provisions of decision 2008/411/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission decision 2008/671/ec of 5 august 2008 on the harmonised use of radio spectrum in the 5 875 - 5 905 mhz frequency band for safety-related applications of intelligent transport systems (its) timetable: the provisions of decision 2008/671/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission decision 2007/344/ec of 16 may 2007 on harmonised availability of information regarding spectrum use within the community timetable: the provisions of decision 2007/344/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission decision 2007/90/ec of 12 february 2007 amending decision 2005/513/ec on the harmonised use of radio spectrum in the 5 ghz frequency band for the implementation of wireless access systems including radio local area networks (was/rlans) timetable: the provisions of decision 2007/90/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission decision 2005/513/ec of 11 july 2005 on the harmonised use of radio spectrum in the 5 ghz frequency band for the implementation of wireless access systems including radio local area networks (was/rlans), as amended by commission decision 2007/90/ec timetable: the provisions of decision 2005/513/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission implementing decision 2013/752/eu of 11 december 2013 amending decision 2006/771/ec on harmonisation of the radio spectrum for use by short-range devices and repealing decision 2005/928/ec timetable: the provisions of implementing decision 2013/752/eu shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission decision 2011/829/eu of 8 december 2011 amending decision 2006/771/ec on harmonisation of the radio spectrum for use by short-range devices timetable: the provisions of implementing decision 2011/829/eu shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission decision 2010/368/eu of 30 june 2010 amending decision 2006/771/ec on harmonisation of the radio spectrum for use by short-range devices timetable: the provisions of decision 2010/368/eu shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission decision 2009/381/ec of 13 may 2009 amending decision 2006/771/ec on harmonisation of the radio spectrum for use by short-range devices timetable: the provisions of decision 2009/381/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission decision 2008/432/ec of 23 may 2008 amending decision 2006/771/ec on harmonisation of the radio spectrum for use by short-range devices timetable: the provisions of decision 2008/432/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission decision 2006/771/ec of 9 november 2006 on harmonisation of the radio spectrum for use by short-range devices, as amended by commission implementing decision 2013/752/eu, commission implementing decision 2011/829/eu, commission decision 2010/368/eu, commission decision 2009/381/ec and commission decision 2008/432/ec timetable: the provisions of decision 2006/771/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission decision 2010/166/ec of 19 march 2010 on harmonised conditions of use of radio spectrum for mobile communication services on board vessels (mcv services) in the european union timetable: the provisions of decision 2010/166/eu shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission implementing decision 2014/641/eu of 1 september 2014 on harmonised technical conditions of radio spectrum use by wireless audio programme making and special events equipment in the union timetable: the provisions of implementing decision 2014/641/eu shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission decision 2006/804/ec of 23 november 2006 on harmonisation of the radio spectrum for radio frequency identification (rfid) devices operating in the ultra-high frequency (uhf) band timetable: the provisions of decision 2006/804/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission decision 2011/485/eu of 29 july 2011 amending decision 2005/50/ec on the harmonisation of the 24 ghz range radio spectrum band for the time-limited use by automotive short-range radar equipment in the community timetable: the provisions of implementing decision 2011/485/eu shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission decision 2005/50/ec of 17 january 2005 on the harmonisation of the 24 ghz range radio spectrum band for the time-limited use by automotive short-range radar equipment in the community, as amended by commission implementing decision 2011/485/eu timetable: the provisions of decision 2005/50/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission decision 2004/545/ec of 8 july 2004 on the harmonisation of radio spectrum in the 79 ghz range for the use of automotive short-range radar equipment in the community timetable: the provisions of decision 2004/545/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission implementing decision 2014/702/eu of 7 october 2014 amending decision 2007/131/ec on allowing the use of the radio spectrum for equipment using ultra-wideband technology in a harmonised manner in the community timetable: the provisions of implementing decision 2014/702/eu shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission decision 2009/343/ec of 21 april 2009 amending decision 2007/131/ec on allowing the use of the radio spectrum for equipment using ultra-wideband technology in a harmonised manner in the community timetable: the provisions of decision 2009/343/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission decision 2007/131/ec of 21 february 2007 on allowing the use of the radio spectrum for equipment using ultra-wideband technology in a harmonised manner in the community, as amended by commission implementing decision 2014/702/eu and commission decision 2009/343/ec timetable: the provisions of decision 2007/131/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission decision 2007/98/ec of 14 february 2007 on the harmonised use of radio spectrum in the 2 ghz frequency bands for the implementation of systems providing mobile satellite services timetable: the provisions of decision 2007/98/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission implementing decision (eu) 2016/339 of 8 march 2016 on the harmonisation of the 2 010-2 025 mhz frequency band for portable or mobile wireless video links and cordless cameras used for programme making and special events timetable: the provisions of implementing decision (eu) 2016/339 shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission implementing decision (eu) 2015/750 of 8 may 2015 on the harmonisation of the 1 452-1 492 mhz frequency band for terrestrial systems capable of providing electronic communications services in the union timetable: the provisions of implementing decision (eu) 2015/750 shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission implementing decision 2013/654/eu of 12 november 2013 amending decision 2008/294/ec to include additional access technologies and frequency bands for mobile communications services on aircraft (mca services) timetable: the provisions of implementing decision 2013/654/eu shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission decision 2008/294/ec of 7 april 2008 on harmonised conditions of spectrum use for the operation of mobile communication services on aircraft (mca services) in the community, as amended by commission implementing decision 2013/654/eu timetable: the measures resulting from the operation of decision 2008/294/ec shall be implemented within two years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2014/53/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 16 april 2014 on the harmonisation of the laws of the member states relating to the making available on the market of radio equipment and repealing directive 1999/5/ec timetable: the provisions of directive 2014/53/eu shall be implemented within four years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2000/31/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 8 june 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the internal market (directive on electronic commerce) the following provisions of directive 2000/31/ec shall apply: enhancing development of e-commerce; removing barriers to the cross-border provision of information society services; providing legal security to providers of information society services; and harmonising limitations to liability of service providers acting as intermediaries when providing mere conduit, caching or hosting, stipulating no general obligation to monitor. timetable: those provisions of directive 2000/31/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2003/98/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 17 november 2003 on the re-use of public sector information, as amended by directive 2013/37/eu of the european parliament and of the council timetable: the provisions of directive 2003/98/ec shall be implemented within two years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2013/37/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 26 june 2013 amending directive 2003/98/ec on the re-use of public sector information timetable: the provisions of directive 2013/37/eu shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. regulation (eu) no 910/2014 of the european parliament and of the council of 23 july 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing directive 1999/93/ec timetable: the provisions of regulation (eu) no 910/2014 shall be implemented within six years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission implementing regulation (eu) 2015/806 of 22 may 2015 laying down specifications relating to the form of the eu trust mark for qualified trust services timetable: the provisions of implementing regulation (eu) 2015/806 shall be implemented within six years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission implementing decision (eu) 2015/1505 of 8 september 2015 laying down technical specifications and formats relating to trusted lists pursuant to article 22(5) of regulation (eu) no 910/2014 of the european parliament and of the council on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market timetable: the provisions of implementing decision (eu) 2015/1505 shall be implemented within six years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission implementing decision (eu) 2015/1506 of 8 september 2015 laying down specifications relating to formats of advanced electronic signatures and advanced seals to be recognised by public sector bodies pursuant to articles 27(5) and 37(5) of regulation (eu) no 910/2014 of the european parliament and of the council on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market timetable: the provisions of implementing decision (eu) 2015/1506 shall be implemented within six years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission implementing decision (eu) 2016/650 of 25 april 2016 laying down standards for the security assessment of qualified signature and seal creation devices pursuant to articles 30(3) and 39(2) of regulation (eu) no 910/2014 of the european parliament and of the council on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market timetable: the provisions of implementing decision (eu) 2016/650 shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. draft decision no / of the eu-republic of moldova association committee meeting in trade configuration of 2018 concerning the update of annex xxviii-d (rules applicable to international maritime transport) to the association agreement between the european union and the european atomic energy community and their member states of the one part, and the republic of moldova, of the other part the association committee, having regard to the association agreement between the european union and the european atomic energy community and their member states, of the one part, and the republic of moldova, of the other part, signed in brussels on 27 june 2014, and in particular articles 85, 253, 436, 438 and 449 thereof, whereas: (1) the association agreement between the european union and the european atomic energy community and their member states of the one part, and the republic of moldova, of the other part (the agreement) entered into force on 1 july 2016. (2) articles 85 and 253 of the agreement provide that the republic of moldova is to carry out approximation of its legislation to the eu acts and international instruments (the union acquis) referred to in annex xxviii-d (rules applicable to international maritime transport) to the agreement (annex xxviii-d). (3) the union acquis referred to in annex xxviii-d has evolved since the conclusion of negotiations of the agreement in june 2013. in particular, the union adopted the following acts that implement, amend, supplement or replace the acts referred to in annex xxviii-d: (i) commission implementing directive 2014/111/eu of 17 december 2014 amending directive 2009/15/ec with regard to the adoption by the international maritime organization (imo) of certain codes and related amendments to certain conventions and protocols (1); (ii) commission implementing regulation (eu) no 1355/2014 of 17 december 2014 amending regulation (ec) no 391/2009 with regard to the adoption by the international maritime organization (imo) of certain codes and related amendments to certain conventions and protocols (2); (iii) directive 2014/90/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 23 july 2014 on marine equipment and repealing council directive 96/98/ec (3); (iv) regulation (eu) 2015/757 of the european parliament and of the council of 29 april 2015 on the monitoring, reporting and verification of carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport, and amending directive 2009/16/ec (4); (v) commission directive 2014/100/eu of 28 october 2014 amending directive 2002/59/ec of the european parliament and of the council establishing a community vessel traffic monitoring and information system (5); (vi) commission directive (eu) 2016/844 of 27 may 2016 amending directive 2009/45/ec of the european parliament and of the council on safety rules and standards for passenger ships (6) and corrigendum to commission directive (eu) 2016/844 of 27 may 2016 amending directive 2009/45/ec of the european parliament and of the council on safety rules and standards for passenger ships (7); (vii) commission directive (eu) 2015/2087 of 18 november 2015 amending annex ii to directive 2000/59/ec of the european parliament and of the council on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues (8); (viii) directive 2013/38/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 12 august 2013 amending directive 2009/16/ec on port state control (9); (ix) regulation (eu) no 1257/2013 of the european parliament and of the council of 20 november 2013 on ship recycling and amending regulation (ec) no 1013/2006 and directive 2009/16/ec (10); (x) commission regulation (eu) no 428/2010 of 20 may 2010 implementing article 14 of directive 2009/16/ec of the european parliament and of the council as regards expanded inspections of ships (11); (xi) commission regulation (eu) no 801/2010 of 13 september 2010 implementing article 10(3) of directive 2009/16/ec of the european parliament and of the council as regards the flag state criteria (12); (xii) commission regulation (eu) no 802/2010 of 13 september 2010 implementing article 10(3) and article 27 of directive 2009/16/ec of the european parliament and of the council as regards company performance, as amended by commission implementing regulation (eu) no 1205/2012 (13); (xiii) directive 2009/17/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 23 april 2009 amending directive 2002/59/ec establishing a community vessel traffic monitoring and information system (14); (xiv) directive 2009/18/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 23 april 2009 establishing the fundamental principles governing the investigation of accidents in the maritime transport sector and amending council directive 1999/35/ec and directive 2002/59/ec of the european parliament and of the council (15); (xv) commission directive 2011/15/eu of 23 february 2011 amending directive 2002/59/ec of the european parliament and of the council establishing a community vessel traffic monitoring and information system (16); (xvi) commission regulation (eu) no 1286/2011 of 9 december 2011 adopting a common methodology for investigating marine casualties and incidents developed pursuant to article 5(4) of directive 2009/18/ec of the european parliament and of the council (17); (xvii) commission regulation (ec) no 540/2008 of 16 june 2008 amending annex ii to regulation (ec) no 336/2006 of the european parliament and of the council on the implementation of the international safety management (ism) code within the community, as regards format of forms (18); (xviii) commission directive 2010/36/eu of 1 june 2010 amending directive 2009/45/ec of the european parliament and of the council on safety rules and standards for passenger ships (19); (xix) commission directive 2005/12/ec of 18 february 2005 amending annexes i and ii to directive 2003/25/ec of the european parliament and of the council on specific stability requirements for ro-ro passenger ships (20); (xx) regulation (eu) no 530/2012 of the european parliament and of the council of 13 june 2012 on the accelerated phasing-in of double-hull or equivalent design requirements for single-hull oil tankers (21); (xxi) directive 2012/35/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 21 november 2012 amending directive 2008/106/ec on the minimum level of training of seafarers (22); (xxii) directive 2002/84/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 5 november 2002 amending the directives on maritime safety and the prevention of pollution from ships (23); (xxiii) commission directive 2007/71/ec of 13 december 2007 amending annex ii of directive 2000/59/ec of the european parliament and of the council on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues (24); (xxiv) commission regulation (ec) no 536/2008 of 13 june 2008 giving effect to article 6(3) and article 7 of regulation (ec) no 782/2003 of the european parliament and of the council on the prohibition of organotin compounds on ships and amending that regulation (25); (xxv) council directive 2009/13/ec of 16 february 2009 implementing the agreement concluded by the european community shipowners' association (ecsa) and the european transport workers' federation (etf) on the maritime labour convention, 2006, and amending directive 1999/63/ec (26). (4) the republic of moldova continues the process of approximating its legislation to the union acquis, in accordance with the timelines and priorities set out in annex xxviii-d. in order to ensure proper approximation of the legislation of the republic of moldova to the union acquis, the acts listed under recital (3) should be added to the list set out in annex xxviii-d, and certain deadlines should be amended to take into account the progress already made to date by the republic of moldova in the process of approximation to the union acquis, in accordance with article 449 of the agreement. (5) article 436(3) of the agreement provides that the eu-republic of moldova association council (the association council) shall have the power to update or amend the annexes to the agreement. (6) pursuant to article 438(2) of the agreement, the association council may delegate to the association committee any of its powers, including the power to take binding decisions. (7) by decision no 3/2014 (27) the association council delegated the power to update or amend the annexes to the agreement which relate, inter alia, to chapter 6 (establishment, trade in services and electronic commerce) of title v (trade and trade-related matters) of the agreement to the association committee meeting in trade configuration, to the extent that there are no specific provisions in chapter 6 relating to the update or the amendment of those annexes. there are no specific provisions in chapter 6 relating to the update or the amendment of the annexes. (8) annex xxviii-d should therefore be updated accordingly, has adopted this decision: article 1 annex xxviii-d (rules applicable to international maritime transport) to the agreement is replaced by the annex to this decision. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at , for the association committee the chair (1) oj eu l 366, 20.12.2014, p. 83. (2) oj eu l 365, 19.12.2014, p. 82. (3) oj eu l 257, 28.8.2014, p. 146. (4) oj eu l 123, 19.5.2015, p. 55. (5) oj eu l 308, 29.10.2014, p. 82. (6) oj eu l 141, 28.5.2016, p. 51. (7) oj eu l 193, 19.7.2016, p. 117. (8) oj eu l 302, 19.11.2015, p. 99. (9) oj eu l 218, 14.8.2013, p. 1. (10) oj eu l 330, 10.12.2013, p. 1. (11) oj eu l 125, 21.5.2010, p. 2. (12) oj eu l 241, 14.9.2010, p. 1. (13) oj eu l 241, 14.9.2010, p. 4. (14) oj eu l 131, 28.5.2009, p. 101. (15) oj eu l 131, 28.5.2009, p. 114. (16) oj eu l 49, 24.2.2011, p. 33. (17) oj eu l 328, 10.12.2011, p. 36. (18) oj eu l 157, 17.6.2008, p. 15. (19) oj eu l 162, 29.6.2010, p. 1. (20) oj eu l 48, 19.2.2005, p. 19. (21) oj eu l 172, 30.6.2012, p. 3. (22) oj eu l 343, 14.12.2012, p. 78. (23) oj eu l 324, 29.11.2002, p. 53. (24) oj eu l 329, 14.12.2007, p. 33 (25) oj eu l 156, 14.6.2008, p. 10. (26) oj eu l 124, 20.5.2009, p. 30. (27) decision no 3/2014 of the eu-republic of moldova association council of 16 december 2014 on the delegation of certain powers by the association council to the association committee in trade configuration (oj eu l 110, 29.4.2015, p. 40). annex annex xxviii-d rules applicable to international maritime transport the republic of moldova undertakes to gradually approximate its legislation to the following eu acts and international instruments within the stipulated timeframes. maritime safety flag state/classification societies commission implementing directive 2014/111/eu of 17 december 2014 amending directive 2009/15/ec with regard to the adoption by the international maritime organization (imo) of certain codes and related amendments to certain conventions and protocols timetable: the provisions of implementing directive 2014/111/eu shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2009/15/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 23 april 2009 on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations and for the relevant activities of maritime administrations, as amended by commission implementing directive 2014/111/eu timetable: the provisions of directive 2009/15/ec shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission implementing regulation (eu) no 1355/2014 of 17 december 2014 amending regulation (ec) no 391/2009 with regard to the adoption by the international maritime organization (imo) of certain codes and related amendments to certain conventions and protocols timetable: the provisions of implementing regulation (eu) no 1355/2014 shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. regulation (ec) no 391/2009 of the european parliament and of the council of 23 april 2009 on common rules and standards for ship inspection and survey organisations, as amended by commission implementing regulation (eu) no 1355/2014 timetable: the provisions of regulation (ec) no 391/2009 shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. flag state directive 2009/21/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 23 april 2009 on compliance with flag state requirements timetable: the provisions of directive 2009/21/ec shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. port state control directive 2013/38/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 12 august 2013 amending directive 2009/16/ec on port state control timetable: the provisions of directive 2013/38/eu shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. regulation (eu) 2015/757 of the european parliament and of the council of 29 april 2015 on the monitoring, reporting and verification of carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport, and amending directive 2009/16/ec timetable: the provisions of regulation (eu) 2015/757 shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. regulation (eu) no 1257/2013 of the european parliament and of the council of 20 november 2013 on ship recycling and amending regulation (ec) no 1013/2006 and directive 2009/16/ec timetable: the provisions of regulation (eu) no 1257/2013 shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission regulation (eu) no 428/2010 of 20 may 2010 implementing article 14 of directive 2009/16/ec of the european parliament and of the council as regards expanded inspections of ships timetable: the provisions of regulation (eu) no 428/2010 shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission regulation (eu) no 801/2010 of 13 september 2010 implementing article 10(3) of directive 2009/16/ec of the european parliament and of the council as regards the flag state criteria timetable: the provisions of regulation (eu) no 801/2010 shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission regulation (eu) no 802/2010 of 13 september 2010 implementing article 10(3) and article 27 of directive 2009/16/ec of the european parliament and of the council as regards company performance amended by commission implementing regulation (eu) no 1205/2012 timetable: the provisions of regulation (eu) no 802/2010 shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2009/16/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 23 april 2009 on port state control, as amended by directive 2013/38/eu of the european parliament and of the council, regulation (eu) 2015/757 of the european parliament and of the council and regulation (eu) no 1257/2013 of the european parliament and of the council and as implemented by commission regulation (eu) no 428/2010, commission regulation (eu) no 801/2010 and commission regulation (eu) no 802/2010 timetable: the provisions of directive 2009/16/ec shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. vessel traffic monitoring directive 2009/17/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 23 april 2009 amending directive 2002/59/ec establishing a community vessel traffic monitoring and information system timetable: the provisions of directive 2009/17/ec shall be implemented within four years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission directive 2011/15/eu of 23 february 2011 amending directive 2002/59/ec of the european parliament and of the council establishing a community vessel traffic monitoring and information system timetable: the provisions of directive 2011/15/eu shall be implemented within four years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission directive 2014/100/eu of 28 october 2014 amending directive 2002/59/ec of the european parliament and of the council establishing a community vessel traffic monitoring and information system timetable: the provisions of directive 2014/100/eu shall be implemented within four years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2002/59/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 27 june 2002 establishing a community vessel traffic monitoring and information system and repealing council directive 93/75/eec, as amended by directive 2009/17/ec of the european parliament and of the council, commission directive 2011/15/eu and commission directive 2014/100/eu timetable: the provisions of directive 2002/59/ec shall be implemented within four years of the entry into force of this agreement. accident investigation council directive 1999/35/ec of 29 april 1999 on a system of mandatory surveys for the safe operation of regular ro- ro ferry and high-speed passenger craft services, as amended by directive 2009/18/ec of the european parliament and of the council timetable: the provisions of directive 1999/35/ec shall be implemented within four years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission regulation (eu) no 1286/2011 of 9 december 2011 adopting a common methodology for investigating marine casualties and incidents developed pursuant to article 5(4) of directive 2009/18/ec of the european parliament and of the council timetable: the provisions of regulation (eu) no 1286/2011 shall be implemented within four years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2009/18/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 23 april 2009 establishing the fundamental principles governing the investigation of accidents in the maritime transport sector and amending council directive 1999/35/ec and directive 2002/59/ec of the european parliament and of the council timetable: the provisions of directive 2009/18/ec shall be implemented within four years of the entry into force of this agreement. liability of carriers of passengers regulation (ec) no 392/2009 of the european parliament and of the council of 23 april 2009 on the liability of carriers of passengers by sea in the event of accidents timetable: the provisions of regulation (ec) no 392/2009 shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission regulation (ec) no 540/2008 of 16 june 2008 amending annex ii to regulation (ec) no 336/2006 of the european parliament and of the council on the implementation of the international safety management (ism) code within the community, as regards format of forms timetable: the provisions of regulation (ec) no 540/2008 shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. regulation (ec) no 336/2006 of the european parliament and of the council of 15 february 2006 on the implementation of the international safety management code within the community and repealing council regulation (ec) no 3051/95, as amended by commission regulation (ec) no 540/2008 timetable: the provisions of regulation (ec) no 336/2006 shall be implemented within two years of the entry into force of this agreement. technical and operational rules marine equipment directive 2014/90/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 23 july 2014 on marine equipment and repealing council directive 96/98/ec timetable: the provisions of directive 2014/90/eu shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. passenger ships commission directive 2010/36/eu of 1 june 2010 amending directive 2009/45/ec of the european parliament and of the council on safety rules and standards for passenger ships timetable: the provisions of directive 2010/36/eu shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2009/45/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 6 may 2009 on safety rules and standards for passenger ships, as amended by commission directive 2010/36/eu and commission directive (eu) 2016/844 timetable: the provisions of directive 2009/45/ec shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission directive (eu) 2016/844 of 27 may 2016 amending directive 2009/45/ec of the european parliament and of the council on safety rules and standards for passenger ships timetable: the provisions of directive (eu) 2016/844 shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. council directive 1999/35/ec of 29 april 1999 on a system of mandatory surveys for the safe operation of regular ro-ro ferry and high-speed passenger craft services timetable: the provisions of directive 1999/35/ec shall be implemented within four years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission directive 2005/12/ec of 18 february 2005 amending annexes i and ii to directive 2003/25/ec of the european parliament and of the council on specific stability requirements for ro-ro passenger ships timetable: the provisions of directive 2005/12/ec shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2003/25/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 14 april 2003 on specific stability requirements for ro-ro passenger ships, as amended by commission directive 2005/12/ec timetable: the provisions of directive 2003/25/ec shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. oil tankers regulation (eu) no 530/2012 of the european parliament and of the council of 13 june 2012 on the accelerated phasing-in of double-hull or equivalent design requirements for single-hull oil tankers timetable: the provisions of regulation (eu) no 530/2012 shall be implemented within four years of the entry into force of this agreement. bulk carriers directive 2001/96/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 4 december 2001 establishing harmonised requirements and procedures for the safe loading and unloading of bulk carriers timetable: the provisions of directive 2001/96/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. crew directive 2012/35/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 21 november 2012 amending directive 2008/106/ec on the minimum level of training of seafarers timetable: the provisions of directive 2012/35/eu shall be implemented within four years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2008/106/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 19 november 2008 on the minimum level of training of seafarers, as amended by directive 2012/35/eu of the european parliament and of the council timetable: the provisions directive 2008/106/ec shall be implemented within four years of the entry into force of this agreement. environment commission directive 2007/71/ec of 13 december 2007 amending annex ii of directive 2000/59/ec of the european parliament and of the council on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues timetable: the provisions of directive 2007/71/ec shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission directive (eu) 2015/2087 of 18 november 2015 amending annex ii to directive 2000/59/ec of the european parliament and of the council on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues timetable: the provisions of directive (eu) 2015/2087 shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2000/59/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 27 november 2000 on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues, as amended by commission directive 2007/71/ec and commission directive (eu) 2015/2087 timetable: the provisions of directive 2000/59/ec shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 2002/84/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 5 november 2002 amending the directives on maritime safety and the prevention of pollution from ships timetable: the provisions of directive 2002/84/ec shall be implemented within five years of the entry into force of this agreement. commission regulation (ec) no 536/2008 of 13 june 2008 giving effect to article 6(3) and article 7 of regulation (ec) no 782/2003 of the european parliament and of the council on the prohibition of organotin compounds on ships and amending that regulation timetable: the provisions of regulation (ec) no 536/2008 shall be implemented within four years of the entry into force of this agreement. regulation (ec) no 782/2003 of the european parliament and of the council of 14 april 2003 on the prohibition of organotin compounds on ships, as amended by commission regulation (ec) no 536/2008 timetable: the provisions of regulation (ec) no 782/2003 shall be implemented within four years of the entry into force of this agreement. technical conditions directive 2010/65/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 20 october 2010 on reporting formalities for ships arriving in and/or departing from ports of the member states and repealing directive 2002/6/ec timetable: the provisions of directive 2010/65/eu shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. social conditions council directive 92/29/eec of 31 march 1992 on the minimum safety and health requirements for improved medical treatment on board vessels timetable: the provisions of directive 92/29/eec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. council directive 1999/63/ec of 21 june 1999 concerning the agreement on the organisation of working time of seafarers concluded by the european community shipowners' association (ecsa) and the federation of transport workers' unions in the european union (fst) annex: european agreement on the organisation of working time of seafarers and amended by council directive 2009/13/ec timetable: the provisions of directive 1999/63/ec shall be implemented within four years of the entry into force of this agreement. council directive 2009/13/ec of 16 february 2009 implementing the agreement concluded by the european community shipowners' association (ecsa) and the european transport workers' federation (etf) on the maritime labour convention, 2006, and amending directive 1999/63/ec timetable: the provisions of directive 2009/13/ec shall be implemented within four years of the entry into force of this agreement. directive 1999/95/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 13 december 1999 concerning the enforcement of provisions in respect of seafarers' hours of work on board ships calling at community ports timetable: the provisions of directive 1999/95/ec shall be implemented within three years of the entry into force of this agreement. maritime security directive 2005/65/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 26 october 2005 on enhancing port security timetable: the provisions of directive 2005/65/ec, except those concerning commission inspections, shall be implemented within two years of the entry into force of this agreement. regulation (ec) no 725/2004 of the european parliament and of the council of 31 march 2004 on enhancing ship and port facility security timetable: the provisions of regulation (ec) no 725/2004, except those concerning commission inspections, shall be implemented within two years of the entry into force of this agreement.

name: commission decision (eu) 2019/435 of 12 march 2019 on the proposed citizens' initiative entitled housing for all (notified under document c(2019) 2004) type: decision subject matter: rights and freedoms; european construction; parliament; construction and town planning date published: 2019-03-19 19.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 75/105 commission decision (eu) 2019/435 of 12 march 2019 on the proposed citizens' initiative entitled housing for all (notified under document c(2019) 2004) (only the german text is authentic) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to regulation (eu) no 211/2011 of the european parliament and of the council of 16 february 2011 on the citizens' initiative (1), and in particular article 4 thereof, whereas: (1) the subject matter of the proposed citizens' initiative entitled housing for all refers to the following: the purpose of this european citizens' initiative is to bring about better legal and financial framework conditions to facilitate access to housing for everyone in europe. (2) the objectives of the proposed citizens' initiative refer to the following: we urge the eu to take action to facilitate access to housing for everyone in europe. this includes easier access for all to social and affordable housing, not applying the maastricht criteria to public investment in social and affordable housing, better access to eu funding for non-profit and sustainable housing developers, social, competition-based rules for short-term rentals and the compilation of statistics on housing needs in europe. (3) the annex to the proposed citizens' initiative mentions specifically a number of objectives to be pursued by legal acts of the union for the purpose of implementing the treaties, namely: improved access to subsidised housing in the european union, no account to be taken of public investment in affordable housing in the maastricht deficit criteria, easier access to financial resources from european funds for non-profit and public housing providers, adoption of a harmonised regulatory framework at european level for short-term rental of private housing alongside a sufficient supply of affordable housing, inclusion of standardised data on the housing situation in europe in the european statistical programme. (4) the treaty on european union (teu) reinforces citizenship of the union and enhances the democratic functioning of the union by providing, inter alia, that every citizen is to have the right to participate in the democratic life of the union by way of a european citizens' initiative. (5) to this end, the procedures and conditions required for the citizens' initiative should be clear, simple, user-friendly and proportionate to the nature of the citizens' initiative so as to encourage participation by citizens and to make the union more accessible. (6) the commission has the power to present proposals for legal acts of the union for the purpose of implementing the treaties on the following matters: for the coordination of the provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in member states concerning the taking up and pursuit of activities as self-employed persons, on the basis of articles 53(1) and 62 tfeu; for provisions for the harmonisation of legislation concerning turnover taxes, excise duties and other forms of indirect taxation to the extent that such harmonisation is necessary to ensure the establishment and the functioning of the internal market and to avoid distortion of competition, on the basis of article 113 tfeu; for the approximation of the provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in member states, which have as their object the establishment and functioning of the internal market, on the basis of article 114 tfeu; for the approximation of such laws, regulations or administrative provisions of the member states as directly affect the establishment or functioning of the internal market, on the basis of article 115 tfeu; for further provisions aiming to avoid excessive government deficits as set out in the protocol on the excessive deficit procedure annexed to the treaties, on the basis of article 126(14) tfeu; for the adoption of implementing regulations relating to the european social fund, on the basis of article 164 tfeu; in the field of specific actions outside the structural funds and in order to promote the overall harmonious development of the union, developing and pursuing actions leading to the strengthening of its economic, social and territorial cohesion as foreseen in article 174 tfeu, on the basis of article 175(3) tfeu; for provisions aiming to define the tasks, priority objectives and the organisation of the structural funds, which may involve grouping the funds, on the basis of article 177 tfeu; for adoption of implementing regulations relating to the european regional development fund, on the basis of article 178 tfeu; for measures for the production of statistics, where necessary, for the performance of the activities of the union, on the basis of article 338 tfeu. (7) for these reasons, the proposed citizens' initiative, inasmuch as it aims at proposals from the commission for legal acts of the union for the purpose of implementing the treaties pursuing the objectives referred to in indents 2 to 5 of recital 3 does not manifestly fall outside the framework of the commission's powers to submit a proposal for a legal act of the union for the purpose of implementing the treaties in accordance with article 4(2)(b) of the regulation (eu) no 211/2011. (8) conversely, legal acts for the application of the provisions in the area of public undertakings and undertakings to which member states grant special or exclusive rights, as well as undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest or having the character of a revenue-producing monopoly, on the basis of article 106(3) tfeu, are adopted not on a proposal from the commission, as required by article 4(2)(b) of regulation (eu) no 211/2011, but by the commission. (9) nevertheless, should the proposed citizens' initiative be submitted to it in accordance with article 9 of regulation (eu) no 211/2011, the commission undertakes to assess also the need for adopting or amending legal acts on the basis of article 106(3) tfeu in light of their relevance to the subject matter of this initiative. (10) furthermore, the citizens' committee has been formed and the contact persons have been designated in accordance with article 3(2) of regulation (eu) no 211/2011 and the proposed citizens' initiative is neither manifestly abusive, frivolous or vexatious nor manifestly contrary to the values of the union, as set out in article 2 teu. (11) the proposed citizens' initiative entitled housing for all should therefore be registered. statements of support for this proposed citizens' initiative should be collected, based on the understanding set out in recitals 6 to 9, has adopted this decision: article 1 1. the proposed citizens' initiative entitled housing for all is hereby registered. 2. statements of support for this proposed citizens' initiative may be collected, based on the understanding set out in recitals 6 to 9 of this decision. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on 18 march 2019. article 3 this decision is addressed to the organisers (members of the citizens' committee) of the proposed citizens' initiative entitled housing for all, represented by ms karin zauner and mr santiago mas de xaxas faus, acting as contact persons. done at strasbourg, 12 march 2019. for the commission frans timmermans vice-president (1) oj l 65, 11.3.2011, p. 1.

name: commission decision (eu) 2019/434 of 27 february 2019 on the proposed citizens' initiative entitled europe cares inclusive quality education for children with disabilities (notified under document c(2019) 1545) type: decision subject matter: social affairs; european construction; education; rights and freedoms; parliament date published: 2019-03-19 19.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 75/103 commission decision (eu) 2019/434 of 27 february 2019 on the proposed citizens' initiative entitled europe cares inclusive quality education for children with disabilities (notified under document c(2019) 1545) (only the english text is authentic) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to regulation (eu) no 211/2011 of the european parliament and of the council of 16 february 2011 on the citizens' initiative (1), and in particular article 4 thereof, whereas: (1) the subject-matter of the proposed citizens' initiative entitled europe cares inclusive quality education for children with disabilities refers to the following: the right to inclusive education of children and adults with disabilities within the european union. (2) the objectives of the proposed citizens' initiative refer to the following: over 70 million eu citizens have a disability and 15 million children have special educational needs. children and adults with disabilities are facing excessive barriers in exercising their right to quality inclusive education. many are placed in segregated institutions and those in mainstream educational settings often receive inadequate support. we call on the ec to draft a bill on a common eu framework of inclusive education, which will ensure that no child is left behind when it comes to early intervention services, education and transition towards the labor market. (3) the annex to the proposed citizens' initiative mentions specific areas to become part of a common eu framework of inclusive education, which can be categorised under the following headings: early intervention, habilitation and rehabilitation; identification child find referral upon request; free adequate public education; no-rejection clause; parents' involvement; less restrictive environment; individualized education plan (iep); alternate evaluation mechanisms and abilities-based certification; transition to labor market; nondiscrimination; personal development and training of the teachers. (4) the treaty on european union (teu) reinforces citizenship of the union and enhances further the democratic functioning of the union by providing, inter alia, that every citizen is to have the right to participate in the democratic life of the union by way of a european citizens' initiative. (5) to this end, the procedures and conditions required for the citizens' initiative should be clear, simple, user-friendly and proportionate to the nature of the citizens' initiative so as to encourage participation by citizens and to make the union more accessible. (6) the treaties provide for the adoption, for the purpose of their implementation: of legal acts aiming at combatting discrimination based on disability, on the basis of article 19(1) of the treaty on the functioning of the european union (tfeu); regarding the aim of developing exchanges of information and experience on issues common to the education systems of the member states, of recommendations of the council or of other legal acts providing for incentive measures supporting, coordinating or supplementing the actions of the member states yet excluding any harmonisation of their laws and regulations, on the basis of article 165(2), fourth indent and (4) tfeu; regarding the aim of improving initial and continuing vocational training in order to facilitate vocational integration and reintegration into the labour market, of recommendations of the council or of other legal acts excluding any harmonisation of the laws and regulations of the member states, on the basis of article 166(2), second indent and (4) tfeu. (7) for these reasons, the proposed citizens' initiative does not manifestly fall outside the framework of the commission's powers to submit a proposal for a legal act of the union for the purpose of implementing the treaties in accordance with article 4(2)(b) of the regulation. (8) furthermore, the citizens' committee has been formed and the contact persons have been designated in accordance with article 3(2) of the regulation and the proposed citizens' initiative is neither manifestly abusive, frivolous or vexatious nor manifestly contrary to the values of the union as set out in article 2 teu. (9) the proposed citizens' initiative entitled europe cares inclusive quality education for children with disabilities should therefore be registered. has adopted this decision: article 1 the proposed citizens' initiative entitled europe cares inclusive quality education for children with disabilities is hereby registered. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on 4 march 2019. article 3 this decision is addressed to the organisers (members of the citizens' committee) of the proposed citizens' initiative entitled europe cares inclusive quality education for children with disabilities, represented by ms maria madalina turza and ms violeta giurgi acting as contact persons. done at brussels, 27 february 2019. for the commission frans timmermans vice-president (1) oj l 65, 11.3.2011, p. 1.

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/417 of 8 november 2018 laying down guidelines for the management of the european union rapid information system rapex established under article 12 of directive 2001/95/ec on general product safety and its notification system (notified under document c(2018) 7334) type: decision subject matter: information and information processing; health; marketing; trade policy; consumption date published: 2019-03-15 15.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 73/121 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/417 of 8 november 2018 laying down guidelines for the management of the european union rapid information system rapex established under article 12 of directive 2001/95/ec on general product safety and its notification system (notified under document c(2018) 7334) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to directive 2001/95/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 3 december 2001 on general product safety (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of article 11(1) and point 8 of annex ii thereof, having regard to regulation (ec) no 765/2008 of the european parliament and of the council of 9 july 2008, setting out the requirements for accreditation and market surveillance on the marketing of products and repealing regulation (eec) no 339/93 (2), after consulting the advisory committee, set up by article 15 of directive 2001/95/ec, whereas: (1) article 12 of directive 2001/95/ec establishes a european union rapid information system (rapex) for the rapid exchange of information between the member states and the commission on measures and action taken on products posing a serious risk to the health and safety of consumers. (2) point 8 of annex ii to directive 2001/95/ec requires the guidelines to be regularly updated in the light of new developments and experience. commission decision 2010/15/eu (3) was the first and only update of the guidelines. (3) in view of new developments and in order to ensure more efficient and effective notification procedures in line with best practice, a further update of the guidelines is required. (4) terminology and references have become obsolete as has the means of communication between the commission and the member states authorities and between the authorities themselves. (5) new tools that have been developed over the last years for the proper functioning of rapex (wiki's, interface between rapex and other market surveillance systems) have to be taken into consideration in the guidelines. (6) criteria for the rapex notification, following the new developments, have become unclear and need to be clarified. (7) cross-border online sales of goods have increased. this development needs to be reflected in the notification techniques as well as in the follow-up instruments to be used. (8) regulation (ec) no 765/2008 extends the application of rapex provided for in article 12 of directive 2001/95/ec also to products covered by that legislation. extending the application of rapex raises some issues that need to be clarified in the guidelines. (9) regulation (ec) no 765/2008 applies to consumer products and to professional products such as some medical devices. that regulation covers a broader scope of risks, other than those related to the health and safety of consumers, such as security and environmental risks. therefore, a risk can concern not only consumers but also an indeterminate group of people referred to as end-users. (10) article 22 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 provides therefore that measures taken against products presenting a serious risk to health and safety or other relevant public interests should be notified via rapex. (11) directive 2001/95/ec and regulation (ec) no 765/2008 are complementary and provide a system to improve the safety of non-food products. (12) rapex helps to prevent and restrict the supply of products posing a serious risk to health and safety or, in the case of products covered by regulation (ec) no 765/2008, also to other relevant public interests. it enables the commission to monitor the effectiveness and consistency of market surveillance and enforcement activities in the member states. (13) rapex provides a basis for identifying the need for action at eu level and makes for consistent enforcement of eu product safety requirements and therefore contributes to the smooth functioning of the single market. (14) the notification procedure established under article 11 of directive 2001/95/ec provides for an exchange of information between the member states and the commission on measures adopted on products posing a less than serious risk to the health and safety of consumers. it helps to ensure a consistent, high level of consumer health and to preserve the single market. (15) article 23 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 provides for an information support system where member states make available to the commission the information required by the same article on products presenting a less than serious risk. (16) according to the applicable legislation, member states are not obliged to provide such information in the rapex system. (17) article 16 of the gpsd provides an obligation for member states and the commission to make available to the public information relating to risks to consumer health and safety posed by products. (18) to ensure a coherent system of information for products posing a risk to the health and safety of consumers or, in case of products covered by regulation (ec) no 765/2008, also to other relevant public interests, it would be desirable that available information concerning dangerous products covered by article 23 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 could also be made available in the rapex system. (19) in order to enable the functioning of the rapex system, guidelines should be drawn up on the various aspects of these notification procedures and, in particular, to establish the content of notifications. these should include the information to be contained in the notification, criteria for notifications involving risks that do not or cannot go beyond the territory of the member state and criteria for the classification of notifications according to the degree of urgency. the guidelines should also lay down operating arrangements, including deadlines for the various steps of the notification and follow-up notification procedures as well as confidentiality rules. (20) to ensure that notification procedures are properly applied, the guidelines should also set out risk assessment methods with criteria for identifying risks taking into consideration also the management of risks. (21) in the light of point 2 in annex ii to directive 2001/95/ec, the new guidelines include a set of risk assessment guidelines for consumer products and refer also to professional products, which specify the criteria for identifying serious risks. (22) the guidelines should be addressed to all member states authorities participating in the rapex network pursuant to directive 2001/95/ec and regulation ec no 765/2008, including market surveillance authorities responsible for monitoring the compliance of products with safety requirements and authorities in charge of external border controls, has adopted this decision: article 1 the guidelines for the management of the european union rapid information system rapex established under article 12 of directive 2001/95/ec and its notification system are set out in the annex to this decision. article 2 decision 2010/15/eu is repealed. article 3 this decision is addressed to the member states. done at brussels, 8 november 2018. for the commission v ra jourov member of the commission (1) oj l 11, 15.1.2002, p. 4. (2) oj l 218, 13.8.2008, p. 30. (3) commission decision 2010/15/eu of 16 december 2009 laying down guidelines for the management of the community rapid information system rapex established under article 12 and of the notification procedure established under article 11 of directive 2001/95/ec (the general product safety directive) (oj l 22, 26.1.2010, p. 1). annex guidelines for the management of the european union rapid information system rapex established under article 12 of directive 2001/95/ec (the general product safety directive) and its notification system part i scope and addressees of the guidelines 1. scope, objectives and update 1.1. scope the guidelines for the management of the european union rapid information system rapex established under article 12 of directive 2001/95/ec on general product safety (the guidelines) are adopted by the commission (1) under article 11(1) and annex ii, point 8, of directive 2001/95/ec (the gpsd). the commission is assisted by an advisory committee composed of the representatives from eu member states and established under article 15(3) of the gpsd. point 8 of annex ii to the gpsd states that: the commission shall prepare and regularly update, in accordance with the procedure laid down in article 15(3), guidelines concerning the management of rapex by the commission and member states. article 11 of the gpsd prescribes that member states should inform the commission of measures taken which restrict the placing on the market of products or require their withdrawal or recall to the extent that such information is not eligible for the type of notification article 12 of the gpsd provides for, nor does it qualify for any other notification under any specific community legislation. article 22 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008, provides that, where a member state takes or intends to take a measure that prevents, restricts or imposes specific conditions on the marketing and use of products posing a serious risk to the health, safety and other relevant public interests of the end-users, it must immediately notify such a measure to the commission using rapex. article 23 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 provides that member states must make available to the commission the information at their disposal, and not already provided under article 22, on products presenting a (less than serious) risk. article 16 of the gpsd provides an obligation for member states and the commission to make available to the public information relating to risks to consumer health and safety posed by products. it would therefore be opportune that all information on measures adopted against products posing a risk, insofar as product safety is at stake, are contained in the system intended for this purpose. member states are therefore encouraged to provide rapex with the measures adopted against products posing a risk and entering into the scope of application of the gpsd or regulation (ec) no 765/2008. the information can be provided directly in rapex. in case the information has to be notified in another information system according to regulation (ec) no 765/2008 (2), the member state can generate a rapex notification from within the information system (see part ii, chapters 1.2(h) and 2.2 of these guidelines). whereas the gpsd applies only to consumer products posing a risk to the health and safety of consumers, regulation (ec) no 765/2008 applies to consumer products but also professional products covered by eu harmonisation legislation (such as certain medical devices and marine equipment). it also covers a broader scope of risk, in addition to those related to the health and safety of consumers, such as security and environmental risks. therefore, a risk can concern not only consumers but also, where regulation (ec) no 765/2008 applies, other end-users. risk assessment guidelines of appendix 6 on part iii are an integral part of the rapex guidelines. they are the instruments that enable determining the level of risk of a product and therefore help to identify the measures to be adopted. the risk assessment guidelines refer to the level of risk as well as to the possible injuries caused by a single product. the risk assessment for a single product must be accompanied by sound risk management. for example, the risk level for a defective household electrical appliance posing a risk of fire may be only low, meaning that the probability of a single appliance causing a fatal fire during the lifetime of the appliance is less than one in a million. nevertheless, if millions of the defective appliances have been placed on the market, it is almost inevitable that fatal fires will occur if appropriate measures are not taken. member states (3), applicant countries, countries which are parties to the european economic area (eea) agreement as well as other non-eu countries and international organisations that are granted access to rapex (on the conditions defined in article 12(4) of the gpsd), participate in the system according to the rules provided for in the gpsd and these guidelines (4). 1.2. objectives the objectives of these guidelines are to: (a) streamline the processes for the notification mechanisms; (b) set out the notification criteria for the notification mechanisms; (c) define the content of notifications and follow-up notifications sent under the notification mechanism, in particular what data are required and which forms are to be used; (d) establish follow-up activities to be taken by member states upon receipt of a notification and the type of information to be provided; (e) describe the handling of notifications and follow-up notifications by the commission; (f) set deadlines for the various types of action taken under the notification mechanisms; (g) set out the practical and technical arrangements needed at commission and member state level for the notification mechanisms to be employed effectively and efficiently; and (h) establish risk assessment methods and, in particular, criteria for identifying serious risks. 1.3. update the guidelines will be regularly updated by the commission in accordance with the advisory procedure on the basis of experience and new developments in the product safety area. 2. addressees of the guidelines the guidelines are addressed to all member states authorities acting on product safety and participating in the rapex network, including market surveillance authorities responsible for monitoring the compliance of products with safety requirements and authorities in charge of external border controls. 3. products 3.1. products covered by these guidelines these guidelines cover two sets of products: the products covered by the gpsd and the products covered by regulation (ec) no 765/2008. 3.1.1. products covered by the gpsd under article 2(a) of the gpsd, consumer products for the purpose of these guidelines are: (a) products intended for consumers products that are designed and manufactured for and made available to consumers; (b) migrating products (5) products that are designed and manufactured for professionals, which are likely, however, under reasonably foreseeable conditions, to be used by consumers. these are products manufactured for professionals that are made available to consumers, who can purchase and operate them without any special knowledge or training, e.g. a power drill, an angle grinder and a table saw designed and manufactured for professionals, but also supplied on the consumer market (i.e. consumers can readily purchase them in shops and operate them on their own without any special training). both products intended for consumers and migrating products can be given to consumers free of charge, can be purchased by consumers and can be provided to consumers in the context of a service. all three situations are covered by rapex. according to article 2 (a) of the gpsd, products provided to consumers in the context of a service are to be considered as including: (a) products supplied to consumers that are taken away and used outside the premises of a service provider, such as cars and lawn-mowing machines rented or leased in rental shops, and tattoo inks and implants (that are not classified as medical devices) implanted beneath the skin of a consumer by a service provider; (b) products used on the premises of a service provider, provided that consumers themselves actively operate a product (e.g. start the machine, have the option of stopping it, and affect its operation by changing its position or intensity during use). sun-beds used in tanning salons and fitness centres are examples of such products. use of the products by consumers must be active, and involve a significant degree of control. merely passive use, such as the use of a shampoo by a person whose hair is washed by a hairdresser, or the use of a bus by its passengers, does not qualify as use by consumers. 3.1.2. products covered by regulation (ec) no 765/2008 under regulation (ec) no 765/2008, products for the purpose of rapex are to be considered the products according to the scope and definitions contained in article 15 of the same regulation whether intended for consumers or for professional users. 3.2. products not covered by these guidelines these guidelines do not cover: (a) products that are covered by specific and equivalent notification mechanisms established by other eu legislation, notably: (i) food and feed and other products covered by regulation (ec) no 178/2002 of the european parliament and of the council (6); (ii) medicinal products covered by directive 2001/83/ec of the european parliament and of the council (7), and directive 2001/82/ec of the european parliament and of the council (8); (iii) medical devices covered by regulation (eu) 2017/745 of the european parliament and of the council (9); (iv) active implantable medical devices covered by council directive 90/385/eec (10). (b) products that are not covered by the definition of a product as laid down in article 2(a) of the gpsd, notably: (i) second-hand products or products supplied as antiques or as products to be repaired or reconditioned prior to being used, provided that the supplier clearly informs the person to whom he supplies the product to that effect (article 2(a) of the gpsd); (ii) equipment used or operated by a professional service provider to supply a service, e.g. equipment on which consumers ride or travel and equipment which is operated by a service provider and not by the consumer (recital 9 of the gpsd); (c) products which do not enter into the definition of product contained in article 15(4) of regulation (ec) no 765/2008. 4. measures 4.1. types of measures preventive and restrictive measures can be taken in relation to products posing a risk either on the initiative of the economic operator who placed and/or distributed it on the market (voluntary measures), or as ordered by an authority of a member state competent to monitor the compliance of products with the safety requirements (compulsory measures). for the purpose of these guidelines, the compulsory measures and voluntary measures are defined as follows: (a) compulsory measures: measures adopted or decided to be adopted by member state authorities, often in the form of an administrative decision, which oblige an economic operator to take preventive, corrective or restrictive action in relation to a specific product that they made available on the market. (b) voluntary measures: (i) preventive and restrictive measures adopted on a voluntary basis by an economic operator, i.e. without any intervention of an authority of a member state; (ii) recommendations and agreements with economic operators in their respective activities concluded by member state authorities; this includes agreements which are not in written form and result in preventive or restrictive action taken by economic operators in their respective activities in relation to products posing a serious risk that they made available on the market. 4.2. categories of measures article 8(1)(b) to (f) of the gpsd provides a list of the different categories of measures that are notifiable under rapex when the conditions for notification are fulfilled, including the following measures: (a) marking a product with appropriate warnings on the risk(s) it may present; (b) making the marketing of a product subject to prior conditions; (c) warning consumers and end-users of the risks that could be posed by a product; (d) temporary ban on the supply, offer to supply and display of a product; (e) ban on the marketing of a product and any accompanying measures, i.e. measures required to ensure compliance with the ban; (f) withdrawal of a product from the market; (g) recall of a product from consumers; (h) destruction of a withdrawn or recalled product. for the purpose of rapex, the term withdrawal is used exclusively for measures aimed at preventing the distribution, display and offer of a product posing a risk to consumers or other end-users, while the term recall is used only for measures aimed at achieving the return of such a product that has already been made available to consumers or other end-users by a producer or distributor. 4.3. requirements of the measures under article 12(1) of the gpsd and article 22 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 concerning serious risks, both compulsory and voluntary measures are to be notified in rapex. preventive and restrictive measures adopted on a voluntary basis by an economic operator, i.e. without any intervention of an authority of a member state concerning a product posing a serious risk and the related preventive or restrictive measures initiated by an economic operator should be immediately notified to the competent authorities of member states as indicated in article 5(3) of the gpsd and in article 22(2) and (3) of regulation (ec) no 765/2008. all categories of preventive and restrictive measures taken in relation to the marketing and use of consumer products posing a serious risk to the health and safety of consumers or, in the case of products covered by regulation (ec) no 765/2008, posing a serious risk to the health, safety or other relevant public interests of the end-users are subject to the notification obligation under rapex. 4.4. exclusion of generally applicable compulsory measures generally applicable acts adopted at national level and aimed at preventing or restricting the marketing and use of (a) generally described category(ies) of consumer products due to the serious risk they pose to the health and safety of consumers should not be notified to the commission through the rapex application. all such national measures that apply to only generally defined categories of products, such as all products in general or all products serving the same purpose and not to (categories of) products specifically identified by their brand, specific look, producer, trader, model name or number, etc. are notified to the commission under directive (eu) 2015/1535 of the european parliament and of the council (11). 5. risk levels 5.1. serious risk before an authority of a member state decides to submit a rapex notification, it always performs an appropriate risk assessment (see part iii, appendix 6 of these guidelines or the complementary eu general risk assessment methodology for products covered by regulation (ec) no 765/2008 (12)) in order to assess whether the product to be notified poses a serious risk to the health and safety of consumers or, in the case of products covered by regulation (ec) no 765/2008, a serious risk to the health, safety or to other relevant public interests (for example, security or the environment) of the end-users, and thus whether one of the rapex notification criteria is met. 5.2. less than serious risk notifications sent in accordance with article 11 of the gpsd or article 23 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 are generally considered as notifications for products posing a less than serious risk. notifications of such products, contrary to notifications for products presenting a serious risk, do not necessarily involve an obligation for follow-up activities by other member states unless the nature of the product or of the risk so requires (see part ii chapter 3.4.6.1). 5.3. risk assessment method part iii, appendix 6 to these guidelines sets out a risk assessment method that can be used by member state authorities to assess the level of risks posed by consumer products to the health and safety of consumers and to decide whether a rapex notification is necessary. equally, you may need to consult the complementary eu general risk assessment methodology as referred to in chapter 5.1 in case the product concerned is covered by regulation (ec) no 765/2008. a specific tool (rag or risk assessment guidelines (13)) is available on the rapex website and in the rapex application to perform risk assessments, which takes accounts of the principles provided for in appendix 6. 5.4. assessing authority the risk assessment is always performed or checked by the authority of a member state that either carried out the investigation and took appropriate measures, or which monitored the voluntary action taken with regard to a product posing a risk by an economic operator. any unclear issues are resolved by the rapex contact point (see part ii, chapter 5.1) with the authority responsible before a notification is transmitted through the rapex application. 6. cross-border effects 6.1. international event under article 12 of the gpsd and article 22 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008, a member state submits a rapex notification only if it considers that the effects of the risk(s) posed by a product go or can go beyond its territory (cross-border effects or international event). in the light of the free movement of products in the internal market, and the fact that products are imported into the eu through different distribution channels and that consumers buy products during stays abroad and via the internet, national authorities are encouraged to interpret the cross-border effects criterion in a fairly broad sense. an article 12 of the gpsd or article 22 notification of regulation (ec) no 765/2008, therefore, is submitted where: (a) it cannot be excluded that a product posing a risk has been sold in more than one eu member state; or (b) it cannot be excluded that a product posing a risk has been sold via the internet; or (c) the product originates from a third country and is likely to have been imported into the eu through multiple distribution channels. 6.2. local event measures adopted in relation to a product posing a serious risk that can only have a local effect (local event) are not notified under article 12 of the gpsd. this applies in situations where an authority of a member state has concrete and strong reasons to exclude the possibility that a product has been and or will be made available (by any means) in other member states, e.g. measures taken with regard to a local product manufactured and distributed only in one member state. in its evaluation, the authorities of the member state have to take carefully into consideration the possibility that a product could be sold online or through new emerging distribution channels. a notification in relation to a product posing a serious risk involving a local event only requires to be submitted to the commission insofar as it involves information likely to be of interest to member states from the product safety standpoint, and in particular if they are in response to a new type of risk which has not yet been notified, a new type of risk arising from a combination of products or a new type or category of products. such notification is to be submitted under article 11 with reference to the second subparagraph of article 11(1), of the gpsd. part ii eu rapid information system rapex established under article 12 of the general product safety directive 1. introduction 1.1. objectives of rapex article 12 of the gpsd establishes an eu rapid information system (rapex). rapex plays an important role in the area of product safety. it complements other actions taken both at national and at eu level to ensure a high level of product safety in the eu. rapex data helps to: (a) prevent and restrict the supply of dangerous products; (b) monitor the effectiveness and consistency of market surveillance and enforcement activities carried out by member state authorities; (c) identify needs and provide a basis for action at eu level; and (d) make for consistent enforcement of the eu product safety requirements and therefore contribute to the smooth functioning of the single market. 1.2. components of rapex rapex consists of several complementary components, which are crucial for its effective and efficient operation. the most important are: (a) the legal framework that regulates how the system operates (i.e. the gpsd and the guidelines); (b) the online application (the rapex application), which allows member states and the commission to exchange information rapidly via a web-based platform; (c) the rapex contact points network, which consists of the single rapex contact points responsible for operating rapex in all member states (see part ii, chapter 5.1); (d) the national rapex networks established in all member states, which include the rapex contact point (see part ii, chapter 5.1) and all the authorities involved in ensuring product safety; (e) the commission rapex team in the department responsible for the gpsd, which examines and validates documents submitted through the rapex application, and maintains and ensures correct operation of rapex; (f) the rapex website (14), which provides summaries of rapex notifications as well as weekly updates; (g) rapex publications, such as rapex statistics, rapex annual reports and other promotional materials; and (h) the interface between rapex and icsms, which consists on a link between both systems that facilitates the encoding of rapex notifications based on investigation data already available in icsms. by filling in the appropriate fields in icsms, a rapex notification can be automatically submitted. 2. notification criteria rapex applies to measures which prevent, restrict or impose specific conditions on the marketing and use of products posing a serious risk to the health and safety of consumers or, in the case of products covered by regulation (ec) no 765/2008, to measures which prevent, restrict or impose specific conditions on the marketing and use of products posing a serious risk to the health, safety or other relevant public interests (for example, security or the environment) of the end-users. 2.1. mandatory participation in rapex: article 12 of the gpsd and article 22 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 under the gpsd and regulation (ec) no 765/2008, the participation of member states in rapex is mandatory. according to article 12 of the gpsd and article 22 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 member states have a legal obligation to notify the commission both compulsory and voluntary measures when the following four notification criteria are met: (a) the product falls under the scope of application of the gpsd or under the scope of application of regulation (ec) no 765/2008; (b) the product is subject to measures that prevent, restrict or impose specific conditions on its possible marketing or use (preventive and restrictive measures); (c) the product poses a serious risk to the health and safety of consumers or, in case of products covered by regulation (ec) no 765/2008, also to other relevant public interests of the end-users; (d) it cannot be ruled out that the effect of the serious risk to the health and safety of consumers or, in case of products covered by regulation (ec) no 765/2008, also to other relevant public interests of the end-users, goes beyond the territory of the notifying member state. 2.2. non-mandatory participation in rapex: article 11 of the gpsd and article 23 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 according to article 11 of the gpsd, member states should inform the commission of measures taken which restrict the placing on the market of products or require their withdrawal or recall insofar such information does not qualify for an article 12 nor any other notification set out in any specific community legislation. for the sake of simplification and efficiency gains, member states may also make use of the rapex application to notify measures taken against products which would not qualify for submitting an article 12 notification in the terms outlined herein. where the following four notification criteria are met, member states have a legal obligation to notify the commission under article 11 of the gpsd: (a) the product concerned is a consumer product; (b) it is subject to restrictive measures adopted by national authorities (compulsory measures); (c) it poses a less than serious risk to the health and safety of consumers and the effects of which can or do go beyond the territory of one member state or, it poses a serious risk to the health and safety of consumers and the effect of which do not or cannot go beyond its territory yet the measures adopted involve information likely to be of interest to other member states from a product safety standpoint (15); (d) the measures adopted do not have to be notified under any other notification procedure established by eu law. notwithstanding the fact that article 11 of the gpsd does not contain an explicit obligation to notify voluntary measures adopted against products posing a less than serious risk, article 16 of the gpsd requires member states and the commission to make information relating to risks to consumer health and safety available to the public. therefore, for the sake of coherence in the notification system and to effectively implement the obligations both member states and the commission have according to article 16 of the gpsd, member states are recommended to notify in rapex also voluntary measures adopted by the producers and distributors against products posing a less than serious risk. according to article 23 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 member states provide the commission with information at their disposal, and not already provided under article 22, on products presenting a (less than serious) risk. contrary to article 22 of this regulation, article 23 does not oblige member states to submit a notification to rapex with this information. article 16 of the gpsd obliges, though, the commission and the member states to make public the information they may have relating to risks to consumer health and safety. for the sake of coherence and to effectively implement the obligations contained in article 16 of the gpsd, the most pragmatic solution could be for rapex to contain all measures adopted against products presenting serious and less than serious risks to consumer health and safety both for gpsd products and products covered by regulation (ec) no 765/2008, and in the latter case, also to other relevant public interests of the end-users. therefore, when measures are adopted and provided through icsms according to article 23 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008, member states are encouraged to notify such information in rapex. this can be done either by submitting a separate notification in rapex or through icsms. a link between both systems facilitates the encoding of notifications based on investigation data already available in icsms. (see part ii, chapter 1.2(h)). type of risk product covered by the gpsd product covered by regulation (ec) 765/2008 measure adopted cross-border effect unsufficient identification information information involving new risk notification type serious risk article 12 of the gpsd article 11 of the gpsd article 22 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 indistinctly for information indistinctly information to icsms rapex notification encouraged less than serious risk compulsory measures article 11 of the gpsd voluntary measures for information article 23 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 rapex notification encouraged pending for information (if relevant) a notification scheme is included in part iii, appendix 3 of these guidelines providing further clarification on the notification criteria referred to in part ii chapter 2 of these guidelines. 3. notifications 3.1. types of notification 3.1.1. notifications the authorities of the member states are required to submit a notification to the rapex system in the following cases: (a) where all the rapex notification criteria laid down in article 12 of the gpsd (16) are met, a member state prepares and submits to the commission a rapex notification classified in the rapex application as an article 12 notification. (b) where all the rapex notification criteria are met and, in addition, a product poses a life-threatening risk and/or there have been fatal accidents, and in other cases where a rapex notification requires emergency action by all member states, the notifying member state prepares and submits to the commission a rapex notification classified in the rapex application as a notification requiring emergency action. (c) where all rapex notification criteria laid down in article 22 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 (17) are met, a member state prepares and submits to the commission a rapex notification classified in the rapex application as an article 22 notification. where all notification criteria laid own in article 11 of the gpsd (18) are met, a member state prepares and submits to the commission a notification, which, when notified in rapex is classified as an article 11 notification. moreover, member states are encouraged to submit a notification where the criteria laid down in article 23 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 are met (19). following the abovementioned reasoning in part ii chapter 2, member states are encouraged to prepare and submit, either directly or indirectly, to the commission a notification classified in rapex as an article 23 notification when the criteria laid down in the same article are met. before sending a notification to the commission, the rapex contact point (see part ii, chapter 5.1) of the notifying member state checks that all notification criteria are met. 3.1.2. notifications for information if the criteria laid down in these guidelines for the notifications listed in part ii chapters 2.1 and 2.2 of these guidelines are not met, the rapex contact point (see part ii, chapter 5.1) may choose to use the rapex application to send the information concerned for information purposes. such notifications are classified in rapex as notifications for information and they may be sent in the following situations: (a) where all the rapex notification criteria laid down in article 12 of the gpsd or in article 22 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 are met but a notification does not contain all the information (mainly on product identification and distribution channels) necessary for other member states to ensure follow-up (20) to such a notification. a notification where the product name, brand and picture are missing and thus the notified product cannot be correctly identified and it cannot be distinguished from other products of the same category or type that are available on the market, is an example of a notification that can be distributed through the rapex application as notification for information. assessment as to whether a notification contains sufficient information for other member states to ensure follow-up activities is always on a case-by-case basis. (b) where a member state is aware of the fact that a consumer product that is available on the eu market poses a serious risk to the health and safety of consumers or, in the case of products covered by regulation (ec) 765/2008, is aware of the fact that a consumer or a professional product poses a serious risk to the health and safety or other relevant public interests of the end-users, but preventive and restrictive measures have not yet been taken by the producer or distributor or adopted or decided to be adopted by an authority of a member state. if information on such a product is distributed through the rapex application before measures are taken, the notifying member state subsequently informs the commission (as soon as possible and not later than the deadlines specified in appendix 4 to these guidelines) of the final decision taken with regard to the notified product (mainly, what type of preventive or restrictive measures were taken or why such measures were not taken). where the notifying member state takes measures at a later stage, it informs the commission, who will update the notification in application of article 12 of the gpsd or article 22 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008. (c) where a member state decides to notify preventive and restrictive measures taken in relation to a consumer product posing a serious risk to the health and safety of consumers which has only local effects (local event). if, however, as explained in part i, chapter 6.2, a notification by local event involves information on product safety likely to be of interest for other member states, it should be sent as if it were a notification under article 11 of the gpsd. (d) where a notification concerns a product whose safety aspects (especially the level of risk posed to the health and safety of consumers) are subject to discussion at eu level to ensure a common approach between member states to risk assessment and/or enforcement action (21). (e) where a decision cannot be taken with certainty that one or more of the notification criteria are met, but a notification involves information on product safety likely to be of interest for other member states. when sending a notification for information, the rapex contact point (see part ii, chapter 5.1) clearly states the reasons for so doing. 3.2. content of notifications 3.2.1. scope of data notifications sent to the commission through the rapex application include the following types of data: (a) information enabling the notified product to be identified, i.e. product category, product name, brand, model and/or type number, barcode, batch or serial number, customs code, description of the product and its packaging accompanied by pictures showing the product, its packaging and labels. detailed and accurate product identification is a key element for market surveillance and enforcement, as it allows national authorities to identify the notified product, to distinguish it from other products of the same or similar type or category that are available on the market and to find it on the market and take or agree on appropriate measures. (b) information establishing the product's origin, i.e. country of origin, name, address and contact details, such as telephone number and e-mail address, of a manufacturer and exporters. in particular, member states provide all available information on manufacturers and exporters located in third countries that cooperate closely with the eu on product safety. the following documents are also to be attached to the form where available: copies of orders, sales contracts, invoices, shipping documents, customs declarations, etc. these documents should be transmitted in pdf format or any other format accepted by the application. detailed information on third country producers allows the commission to promote more effective enforcement in those countries and helps to reduce the number of products posing a risk to consumers exported into the eu. (c) wherever possible, information about where exactly the product has been made available (a major store, local shop or market, online, etc.). (d) information on the safety requirements applicable to the notified product, including the reference number and name of the applicable legislation and standards. (e) a risk description of the notified product, including a description of the results of laboratory or visual tests, test reports and certificates proving non-compliance of the notified product with the safety requirements, a complete risk assessment with conclusions and information on known accidents or incidents (see part i chapter 3.3.1 of these guidelines). (f) information on the supply chains of the notified product in the member states and, in particular, information on the countries of destination, plus information on importers and also, if available, on distributors of the notified product in europe. (g) information on measures taken, in particular, the type (compulsory or voluntary), category (e.g. withdrawal from the market, recall from consumers), scope (e.g. national, local), and date of entry into force and duration of the measure (e.g. permanent, temporary). (h) indication of whether a notification, part of it and/or attachment(s) are covered by confidentiality. requests for confidentiality are always accompanied by a justification clearly stating the reasons for such a request. (i) information on whether the product is counterfeit, when available. for this purpose, the commission will provide member states with any specific tools available at european level to facilitate the identification of counterfeit products. (j) information on reported accidents related to the product, indicating when possible the reasons for the accident (risk related to the use made by the user or inherent to the product). (k) additional information on whether the notification has been submitted in the context of a coordinated enforcement activity at european level. (l) information on whether the authorities of a member state envisage sending other notifications related to the same product or similar products. this should be indicated in the original notification. member states are encouraged to look for and provide information on the supply chains of the notified product in non-eu countries that cooperate closely with the eu on product safety. 3.2.2. completeness of data notifications should be as complete as possible. the elements to be contained in the notification are listed in appendix 1 to these guidelines and are included in the rapex application. all fields of the notification template should be completed with the required data. where the required information is not available at the time a notification is submitted, this is clearly indicated and explained on the form by the notifying member state. once the missing information becomes available, the notifying member state updates its notification. the updated notification is examined by the commission before being validated and distributed through the system. rapex contact points provide all national authorities that participate in the rapex network with instructions on the scope of data required to complete the notification. this helps to ensure that the information provided by these authorities to the rapex contact point is correct and complete (see part ii, chapter 5.1). where part of the information required by these guidelines is not yet available, member states should nonetheless comply with the established deadlines and not delay sending a rapex notification on a product that poses a life-threatening risk to the health and safety of consumers or other end-users and/or where a rapex notification requires emergency action by member states. before submitting a notification, the rapex contact point checks (to avoid any unnecessary duplication) that the product concerned has not already been notified through the rapex application by another member state. if the product has already been notified, rather than creating a new notification, the rapex contact point submits a follow-up notification to the existing notification and provides any additional information that may be relevant for authorities in other member states, such as additional vehicle identification numbers, a detailed list of importers and distributors, additional test reports, etc. (see also part ii, chapter 5.1). 3.2.3. updating of data the notifying member state informs the commission (as soon as possible and not later than by the deadlines specified in appendix 4 to these guidelines) of any developments that require changes to a notification transmitted through the rapex application. in particular, member states inform the commission of any changes (e.g. following a ruling by a court during an appeal procedure) to the status of the notified measures, to the risk assessment and to new decisions regarding confidentiality. the commission examines the information provided by the notifying member state and updates the information concerned in the rapex application and on the rapex website, where necessary. 3.2.4. responsibility for the information transmitted responsibility for the information provided lies with the notifying member state (22). the notifying member state and the national authority responsible ensure that all data provided through the rapex application are accurate so as to avoid any confusion with similar products of the same category or type that are available on the eu market. the authority(ies) involved in the notification procedure (e.g. by performing the risk assessment of the notified product or by providing information on distribution channels) take responsibility for the information provided through the rapex application. the rapex contact point checks and validates all notifications received from the authorities responsible before transmitting them to the commission (see also part ii, chapter 5.1). any action taken by the commission, such as examining notifications, validating and distributing them through the rapex application and publishing them on the rapex website, does not imply any assumption of responsibility for the information transmitted, which remains with the notifying member state. 3.3. actors and roles involved in the notification process the parties involved in the notification process and their responsibilities therein are the following: 3.3.1. economic operators economic operators are not directly involved in the submission of notifications in the rapex application. however, in case of a product posing a risk, economic operators shall immediately inform the competent authorities in all member states where the product was made available. the conditions and details for providing such information are laid down in annex i to the gpsd. such information will be dealt with by the member state where the notifying producer/distributor is established (main member state). the transmission of information on products posing a risk can be submitted by economic operators through the product safety business alert gateway, a tool available on the rapex website (see part ii chapter 5.3.2). economic operators should include a detailed description of the risk of the product and can make use of the rag tool available for this purpose (see part i chapter 5.3). risk assessments carried out by economic operators are not binding on member state authorities who are responsible for carrying out their own risk assessment. it is therefore possible for an authority of a member state to come to a different conclusion regarding the risk assessment provided in an alert submitted via the business gateway. 3.3.2. member states authorities member states authorities notify the commission through the rapex application about both compulsory and voluntary measures taken on their own territory against products posing a risk. member states establish the roles for the creation, submission and follow-up of notifications in rapex. 3.3.3. authorities in charge of external border controls measures adopted by the authorities in charge of external border controls that prevent the marketing in the eu of a consumer product posing a serious risk to the health and safety of consumers (e.g. decisions to stop the import at the eu border) should be notified to the commission through the rapex application in the same manner as measures adopted by market surveillance authorities that restrict the marketing or use of a product. 3.3.4. european commission the commission may inform the rapex contact points (see part ii, chapter 5.1) regarding products posing serious risks, imported into or exported from the community and the european economic area (23). the commission may transmit information to the member states about products of eu and non-eu origin posing a risk that, according to the information available, are likely to be on the eu market. this mainly concerns information that the commission receives from third countries, international organisations, businesses or other rapid alert systems. this information might be circulated amongst member states by means other than the rapex application. 3.4. workflow 3.4.1. creation of a notification 3.4.1.1. by a national authority according to the national arrangements, different national authorities involved in the rapex process (local/regional market surveillance authorities, external border control authorities, etc.) may be allowed to create a notification. 3.4.1.2. by the commission in certain cases, the commission may create a notification as explained in point 3.3.4. 3.4.2. submission of notifications to the commission the rapex contact point is responsible for the submission of all notifications for validation by the commission. (see part ii, chapter 5.1). 3.4.3. examination of notifications by the commission the commission checks all notifications received through the rapex application before transmitting them to member states to ensure that they are correct and complete. 3.4.3.1. correctness when assessing the correctness of a notification, the commission checks in particular that: (a) the notification meets all the relevant requirements set out in the gpsd or in article 22 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 and in these guidelines; (b) the notified product has not already been notified (to avoid any unnecessary duplication, including between icsms and rapex); (c) the notification submitted for validation by the notifying member state is classified in accordance with the criteria set out in part ii chapter 2 of these guidelines; (d) the information provided including the risk assessment takes due account of the applicable legislation and the relevant standards; (e) the correct notification procedure has been used. 3.4.3.2. completeness once a notification is confirmed as correct, the commission checks that it is complete. part ii, chapters 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 of these guidelines act as a point of reference. special attention is given to the parts of a notification concerning product identification, risk description, measures, traceability and distribution channels. the commission is not responsible for performing a risk assessment of the product, but only for checking that the notification includes an appropriate risk assessment containing all the elements listed in part ii chapter 3.2.1 of these guidelines (with the exceptions referred to in point 3.4.3.3). see also part i chapter 5.1 of these guidelines. 3.4.3.3. validation of notifications without a detailed risk assessment member states should submit a risk assessment for every notification but in certain cases, the commission may validate notifications that are submitted without a detailed and individual risk assessment: (a) notifications of products posing chemical risks the risk level of a product may be considered to be serious if it contains a chemical substance either banned or in a concentration above the limit established by european legislation. therefore, in cases where measures are taken against products containing a chemical substance subject to a restriction contained in eu legislation, a notification may be submitted without a detailed risk assessment. (b) notifications of cosmetic products validation of notifications that do not include a detailed risk assessment may equally be possible for cosmetic products containing banned or restricted substances, which are backed up by an eu scientific committee opinion supporting that such presence of substances above the established limits poses a risk to the health and safety of consumers. for this specific product sector, other factors (e.g. concentration or time of exposure) may need to be taken into consideration. nevertheless, if measures have been taken against a product containing not authorised chemical substances for which no scientific opinion has been issued confirming that the product poses a risk, a proper risk assessment may be required depending on a case-by-case analysis to prove that the product poses a serious or less than serious risk. in cases where the risk assessment is needed, if such risk assessment is not provided, these cases shall only be validated for information in rapex. as regards products that are subject to restrictive measures by market surveillance authorities based on the presence of a chemical substance mentioned in the list of ingredients which is subject to restrictions contained in eu legislation and where there is no scientific data assessing the risk, notifications need to be assessed on a case-by-case basis. in case where the risk assessment is needed, if such risk assessment is not provided, these cases shall only be validated for information in rapex. (c) notification of other products where there is well-documented evidence that certain features of certain products consistently lead to a specific risk and risk level (e.g., the presence of any drawstrings or functional cords in the head, neck or upper chest on garments intended for young children always implies a serious risk), no further risk assessment is required for that given product. 3.4.3.4. requests for additional information should, during examination, the commission have questions regarding a notification, it may suspend validation of the notification and ask the notifying member state for additional information or clarification. this additional information is provided by the notifying member state by the deadline specified in the commission's request for information. 3.4.3.5. investigation where necessary, the commission may carry out an investigation to assess the safety of a product. this investigation may be conducted in particular where there are serious doubts as to the risks posed by the product notified via the rapex application. these doubts can either arise during the examination of a notification by the commission, or be brought to the attention of the commission by a member state (e.g. through a follow-up notification) or by a third party (e.g. a producer). as part of such investigations, the commission may, in particular: (a) ask any member state to provide information or clarification; (b) ask for an independent risk assessment and independent testing (laboratory or visual) of the product under investigation; (c) consult the scientific committees, the joint research centre or any other institution specialising in the safety of consumer products; (d) convene the gpsd committee, consumer safety network and/or rapex contact points meetings, as well as consult the relevant working groups to discuss developments in an investigation. where an investigation concerns a product notified through the rapex application, the commission may suspend validation of a notification or, where such a notification has already been validated and distributed through the rapex application, temporarily remove the overview published on the rapex website. after an investigation, and depending on the outcome, the commission (after consulting the notifying member state, where necessary) may in particular validate and distribute through the rapex application the previously suspended notification, uphold the validated notification in the rapex application (with any changes) or permanently withdraw the notification from rapex. the commission informs all member states of the following: (a) its decision to launch an investigation, clearly stating the reasons for its decision; (b) its decision to close an investigation, presenting its conclusions and changes to the investigated notification(s) (if any); (c) all the relevant developments during an investigation. 3.4.4. validation and distribution of notifications the commission validates and distributes through the rapex application, by the deadlines specified in appendix 5 to these guidelines, all notifications assessed as correct and complete during the examination. where, during an examination, a request for additional information or clarification was sent to the notifying member state (followed by a reminder, if necessary), the commission may take the following decisions: (a) where the additional information or clarification requested has been provided, the commission re-examines the notification and may validate it with the changed classification where necessary (e.g. from a notification for information to an article 12 notification) or keep it on hold until further clarification; (b) where the additional information or clarification requested has not been provided within a specified deadline or it is insufficient, the commission takes a decision on the basis of the information provided and, depending on the circumstances, may either validate it after changing the classification (e.g. from an article 12 notification to notification for information) or decide not to validate it. once a common approach to risk assessment and/or enforcement has been agreed between member states, depending on the circumstances and the views of the member states, the commission may take one of the following actions: (a) keep the notifications concerned in the rapex application; (b) change the classification of the notifications stored in the rapex application; (c) withdraw notifications from rapex (24). 3.4.5. publication of notifications 3.4.5.1. disclosure of information as a general rule the public has the right to be informed about products posing a risk. to meet this obligation, the commission publishes overviews of new notifications on the rapex website (25). for external communication reasons, the rapex website will in future be called safety gate. member states equally provide the public with information in the national languages on products posing a serious risk to consumers and on measures taken to address this risk. such information may be distributed via the internet, on paper, by electronic media, etc. the information made available to the public is a summary of a notification and includes in particular the elements which allow the identification of the product, as well as the information about the risks and measures taken to prevent or restrict those risks. the commission and the member states may decide to disclose other elements of the notifications to the public, only when this information, due to its nature, is not confidential (professional secrets) and does not need to be protected. the following notifications are made available on the rapex website, in line with the requirements laid down in article 16 of the gpsd: (a) notifications submitted falling under the scope of article 12 of the gpsd; (b) notifications submitted falling under the scope of article 22 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008; (c) notifications submitted falling under the scope of article 11 of the gpsd for products posing less than serious risk, the cross-border effect of which has also been recognised. as chapter 3.4 provides for, the cross-border effect ascertains whether such a scenario is to be notified under article 11; (d) notifications submitted falling under the scope of article 23 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 concerning products presenting risks that are less than serious and regardless of whether the measures taken were compulsory or voluntary (26); (e) notifications submitted for information only if the notifying member state so requests by ticking the ad hoc box in rapex, especially when voluntary measures are adopted and the products concerned are sufficiently identified. the publication of these notifications might need to be considered from the standpoint of securing an appropriate risk management. 3.4.5.2. exceptions to the general rule member states and the commission should not disclose to the public any information about a product notified through the rapex application if such disclosure undermines the protection of court proceedings, monitoring and investigation activities or professional secrecy, except for information relating to the safety properties of products which must be made public if circumstances so require to protect the health and safety of consumers, or, in case of products covered by regulation (ec) no 765/2008, also to protect other relevant public interests of the end-users (27). 3.4.5.3. requests for confidentiality a notifying member state may request confidentiality of a notification. such a request clearly indicates the part(s) of the notification that should be kept confidential. furthermore, each request for confidentiality is accompanied by a justification clearly stating the reasons (28). requests for confidentiality are subject to examination by the commission. the commission checks that the request is complete (i.e. that it states which parts of the notification are covered by confidentiality and that it contains a justification) and justified (i.e. that it is in line with the provisions of the gpsd and these guidelines). a decision as to the validity of the request is taken by the commission after consulting the respective rapex contact point. (see part ii, chapter 5.1). 3.4.5.4. handling of notifications covered by confidentiality article 16(2) of the gpsd states that the protection of professional secrecy or confidentiality shall not prevent the dissemination to the competent authorities of information relevant for ensuring the effectiveness of market monitoring and surveillance activities. notifications covered partially or fully by confidentiality are examined by the commission and, after being validated and distributed through the rapex application, they are subject to the usual follow-up activities by the member states. the confidentiality of a notification or parts of it does not prevent it from being handled and distributed through the rapex application to the competent national authorities. the only significant difference in the handling and follow-up procedures is that the commission and member states should not disclose any parts of a notification that are confidential to the public. these parts have to remain confidential and thus they should not be published in any form. member state authorities that receive confidential information through the rapex application ensure that it is protected when performing their activities. 3.4.5.5. withdrawal of request for confidentiality the notifying member state withdraws its request for confidentiality immediately after the authority in that member state becomes aware that the justification for such a request is no longer valid, and informs the commission accordingly. the commission informs all member states of the withdrawal of confidentiality on receipt of such a request by the notifying member state. a notification that is no longer covered by full or partial confidentiality is made available to the public in line with the general rules applying to publication of notifications set out in these guidelines. 3.4.6. follow-up to notifications 3.4.6.1. follow-up to the different types of notification member states ensure appropriate follow-up to article 12 notifications, article 12 notifications requiring emergency action, notifications under article 22 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 and to information on products posing a risk sent by the commission (chapter 3.3.4) as soon as possible and by the deadlines specified in appendix 4 to these guidelines at the latest. notifications for information as well as notifications under article 11 of the gpsd and notifications under article 23 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 (notification for less than serious risks) do not require any specific follow-up activities. these notifications often do not contain the data needed for effective and efficient enforcement regarding the notified product (e.g. the notified product and/or measures are not sufficiently identified) or the level of the risk is not considered to be serious. although there is no specific need for a follow-up in the referred cases, it is still important that member states verify whether they disagree with the consideration of the risk as less than serious so they may eventually make a follow-up upon the information of a different risk assessment. member states are therefore encouraged to ensure follow-up to such notifications where the notified product is likely to have been made available to consumers on their market and product identification allows measures to be taken. 3.4.6.2. objectives of the follow-up activities on receipt of a notification, a member state examines the information provided in the notification and takes appropriate action in order to: (a) establish whether the product was marketed on its territory; (b) assess what preventive or restrictive measures should be taken with regard to the notified product found on its market, taking into account the measures taken by the notifying member state and any special circumstances that could justify different types of measures or no action being taken; (c) perform additional risk assessment and testing of the notified product, if necessary; (d) collect any additional information that may be relevant for other member states (e.g. information on distribution channels of the notified product in other member states). 3.4.6.3. follow-up techniques to ensure efficient and effective follow-up, best practice follow-up techniques should be employed by national authorities, including: (a) checks on the market national authorities organise regular (planned and random) checks on the market in order to establish whether consumer products notified through the rapex application are made available to consumers. when the member state is mentioned as a country of destination, reinforced checks on the market shall be carried out, notably by contacting the economic operator(s) indicated in the notification. (b) cooperation with business associations national authorities provide, when necessary, business associations with overviews of the most recent notifications and enquire whether any of the notified products were produced or distributed by their members. national authorities provide businesses only with summaries of notifications, such as the weekly overviews published on the rapex website. whole notifications should not be transmitted to third parties, as certain information (e.g. details of the risk description or information on distribution channels) is often confidential and should be protected. (c) publication of rapex data via the internet or other electronic and paper media national authorities regularly alert consumers and businesses about consumer products notified through the rapex application via their websites and/or other media, e.g. referring consumers and business to the rapex website. information published in this way allows consumers to check whether they have and use products posing a risk and often provides the authority with useful feedback. (d) online checks national authorities regularly perform online checks to try to identify whether products notified via rapex are available on online markets. online check techniques may include web-crawling, data mining, data scraping, etc. national authorities apply various follow-up techniques in parallel and ideally do not limit their activities to only one of them. the member state in which a manufacturer, a representative or an importer of the notified product is established (main member state) ensures appropriate follow-up to notifications distributed through the rapex application. the main member state often has better legal and technical means of obtaining information on the notified case, which will help other member states to undertake effective follow-up activities. 3.4.7. withdrawal/removal of notifications 3.4.7.1. permanent withdrawal of a notification from rapex notifications distributed through the rapex application are kept in the system for an unlimited period of time. the commission may, however, in the situations presented in this chapter, permanently withdraw a notification from rapex. 3.4.7.1.1. situations where withdrawal of a submitted or validated notification is possible (a) there is proof that one or more of the notification criteria (29) are not met and thus a notification is not justified. this concerns cases in particular where it is established that the original risk assessment was performed incorrectly and that the notified product does not pose a risk. it also covers situations where the notified measures were successfully challenged in court or in other proceedings and they are no longer valid. (b) no measures have been taken with regard to a product notified through the rapex application (for information) before it was decided to adopt measures or take action (30). (c) after a discussion held at eu level, member states agree that it is not useful to exchange information on certain safety aspects that have been notified through the rapex application (31). (d) there is proof that products covered by a notification are no longer marketed and there is proof that all items that had been made available have already been withdrawn from the market and retrieved in all member states. withdrawal of a notification that has been submitted or validated cannot be requested on the basis of the fact that the notified product has been subject to changes needed for it to comply with all the applicable safety requirements, unless proof is provided that all the products (items) concerned that had been made available have been withdrawn and retrieved in all member states and that they are no longer marketed. 3.4.7.1.2. request for permanent or temporary withdrawal by member states the commission may withdraw notifications from rapex only at the request of the notifying member state, as the latter takes full responsibility for the information transmitted through the system. other member states, however, are encouraged to inform the commission of any facts that may justify withdrawal. 3.4.7.1.3. content of the request for permanent or temporary withdrawal every request for withdrawal is accompanied by a justification stating the reasons and by all available documents supporting those reasons. the commission examines each request and checks the justification and the supporting documents in particular. the commission may request additional information, clarification or the opinion of the notifying member state and/or other member states before taking any decision. 3.4.7.1.4. decision to withdraw should, on the basis of the justification provided, the commission decide to withdraw a notification from rapex, it removes it from: (a) the rapex application (or makes it otherwise invisible to all users of the system); (b) the rapex website (if necessary). the commission informs all member states of the withdrawal of a notification by mail or through other equally effective means and, if necessary, also the public by publishing a corrigendum on the rapex website. 3.4.7.2. temporary removal of a notification from the rapex website 3.4.7.2.1. situations where temporary removal is possible where justified, the commission may temporarily remove a notification from the rapex website, especially where the notifying member state suspects that a risk assessment submitted in a notification has been performed incorrectly and thus the notified product may not pose a risk. a notification can be temporarily removed from the rapex website until the risk assessment of the notified product has been clarified. 3.4.7.2.2. request for temporary removal by member states the commission may temporary remove notifications from the rapex application only at the request of the notifying member state, as the latter takes full responsibility for the information transmitted through the application. other member states, however, are encouraged to inform the commission of any facts that may justify such removal. 3.4.7.2.3. content of the request for temporary removal every request for temporary removal is accompanied by a justification stating the reasons and by all available documents supporting those reasons. the commission examines each request and checks the justification and the supporting documents in particular. the commission may request additional information, clarification or the opinion of the notifying member state and/or other member states before taking any decision. 3.4.7.2.4. decision to remove should, on the basis of the justification provided, the commission decide to remove a notification from the rapex website, it informs all member states by e-mail or by other equally effective means and, if necessary, also the public by publishing a corrigendum on the rapex website. 3.4.7.2.5. re-publishing of a notification temporarily removed the notifying member state immediately informs the commission when the reasons for the removal of a notification from the rapex website are no longer valid. in particular, it informs the commission of the results of any new risk assessment to enable the commission to determine whether to maintain a notification in the rapex application and to re-publish it on the rapex website or to withdraw it permanently from rapex (following a request from the notifying member state). the commission may re-publish a notification on the rapex website following a justified request from the notifying member state after the risk assessment has been clarified. the commission informs the other member states of the re-publishing of a notification on the rapex website by e-mail or by other equally effective means and also the public by replacing the corrigendum with a new one on the rapex website. 3.4.8. notifications older than ten years the commission will place all notifications older than ten years in a separate section of the rapex website. these notifications will still be available for public consultation. 3.5. timing and deadlines for notifications 3.5.1. timing of the notification article 12(1) of the gpsd and article 22 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 require member states to immediately notify the commission through the rapex application of preventive and restrictive measures concerning products posing serious risks. this provision applies to both compulsory and voluntary measures, although the timing of the notification is different. (a) compulsory measures these measures are notified through the rapex application immediately after being adopted or after the decision to adopt them has been taken, even if an appeal against them at national level is likely, if they are already under appeal or they are subject to publication requirements. this approach is consistent with the objective of rapex, i.e. to ensure the rapid exchange of information between member states and the commission in order to prevent the supply and use of products that pose a risk. (b) voluntary measures under article 5(3) of the gpsd and article 22 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008, economic operators are obliged to notify the competent member state authorities of voluntary action and measures taken to prevent risks to consumers posed by products they have made available on the market (ideally by means of a business gateway notification). the authority of a member state receiving this kind of notification uses this information as the basis for a notification (if all the notification criteria are met) and sends it immediately after receipt of the business gateway notification. where voluntary measures are adopted in the form of an agreement between an economic operator and an authority of a member state or on the basis of a recommendation from an authority to a producer or distributor, a notification is submitted immediately after the conclusion of such an agreement or the adoption of such a recommendation. to ensure common application of the notification obligation, part iii, appendix 4 to these guidelines lays down specific deadlines for submitting notifications to the commission via the rapex application (32). 3.5.2. deadlines (33) member states notify the commission of preventive and restrictive measures adopted as soon as possible and by the deadlines specified in part iii, appendix 4 to these guidelines at the latest. appropriate arrangements are in place at national level concerning the transmission of information between national authorities in charge of product safety and the rapex contact point to ensure that the deadlines are met. (see part ii, chapter 5.1). the deadlines provided apply irrespective of any appeal procedure or official publication requirement. 3.5.3. emergency situations all notifications concerning products posing a serious risk requiring emergency action are preceded by a telephone call from the rapex contact point to the commission rapex team's mobile telephone number to facilitate immediate action and follow-up. this rule applies in particular to notifications transmitted at weekends or during holiday periods. (see also part ii, chapter 5.1). 4. follow-up activities 4.1. communication of follow-up activities member states notify the commission of any findings subsequent to their follow-up activities in relation to rapex notifications (i.e. article 12 notifications and notifications requiring emergency action as well as notifications under article 22 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008) and information on products posing a risk sent by the commission (chapter 3.3.4). in addition, member states are encouraged to notify the commission of any follow-up activities regarding notifications for less than serious risks and for information. 4.2. content of follow-up notifications 4.2.1. scope of data findings resulting from follow-up activities are communicated to the commission in the form of follow-up notifications. to harmonise the type of information and to keep the workload to a minimum, member states submit follow-up notifications in particular in the following situations: (a) a notified product has been found on the market a follow-up notification is sent when national authorities find the notified product on the market or at the external border. this follow-up notification contains the full details of the product in question (e.g. name, brand, model number, bar code, batch number) plus information on the total number of items found on the market. furthermore, the following details of the measures taken are communicated: type (compulsory or voluntary), category (e.g. withdrawal from the market, recall from consumers), scope (e.g. country-wide, local), date of entry into force and duration (e.g. permanent, temporary). if the notified product was found on the market but no measures were adopted, specific reasons justifying no measures being taken should be given in the follow-up notification. to reduce the burden on the national authorities as regards their follow-up practice, member states do not need to inform the commission (unless the commission asks to be informed) of the conclusions of follow-up activities by means of a follow-up notification when the notified product is not found on the market. (b) different risk assessment a follow-up notification is sent when the conclusions of a risk assessment performed by an authority of the reacting member state differ from the conclusions set out in the original notification. this follow-up notification contains a detailed risk description (including the results of tests, a risk assessment and information on known accidents and incidents), accompanied by supporting documents (test reports, certificates, etc.). furthermore, the reacting member state should prove that the risk assessment submitted with its follow-up notification was performed on the same product as the one notified, i.e. the same brand, name, model number, batch number, origin, etc. (c) additional information a follow-up notification is sent when national authorities collect additional information (during their follow-up activities) that may be useful for market surveillance and enforcement in other member states. member states are encouraged to collect additional information that may be relevant for authorities both in other member states and in third countries that cooperate closely with the eu on product safety. details include product origin (e.g. information on the country of origin, manufacturer and/or exporters) and information on the supply chains (e.g. information on the countries of destination, importers and distributors). the country carrying out the follow-up activities attaches all available supporting documents to the follow-up notification, such as copies of orders, sales contracts, invoices, customs declarations, etc. member states may also indicate whether certain follow-up actions have been performed although the product has not been found in their territory. 4.2.2. completeness of follow-up notifications the rapex contact point of the reacting member state, together with the responsible authority, ensures that all data provided in their follow-up notification is accurate and complete and that there is no confusion with other similar products that are available on the eu market. (see also part ii, chapter 5.1). the standard follow-up notification template is provided in part iii, appendix 2 to these guidelines. should certain relevant information not be available when a follow-up notification is submitted, the reacting member state indicates this on the follow-up form. once this information becomes available, the reacting member state may request that its follow-up notification be updated. the updated follow-up notification is examined by the commission before it is validated and distributed through the system. the rapex contact point provides all authorities in its own member state that participate in the rapex network with instructions on the scope of the data required to complete the follow-up notification template correctly. this helps to ensure that information provided by these authorities to the contact point is correct and complete. (see part ii, chapter 5.1). 4.2.3. updating of validated follow-up notifications the reacting member state informs the commission (as soon as possible and by the deadlines specified in part iii, appendix 4 to these guidelines at the latest) of any developments that may require changes to a follow-up notification distributed through the rapex application. in particular, member states inform the commission of changes in the status of the measures taken or in the risk assessment submitted with their follow-up notification. the commission examines the information provided by the reacting member state and if necessary updates the information concerned. 4.2.4. responsibility for follow-up notifications responsibility for the information provided in follow-up notifications lies with the notifying member state (34). the authority(ies) involved in the follow-up activities (e.g. by carrying out the risk assessment or by adopting restrictive measures) take responsibility for the information provided in follow-up notifications. the rapex contact point checks and validates all follow-up notifications prepared by the respective authorities before transmitting them to the commission. (see also part ii, chapter 5.1). any action taken by the commission, such as examining and validating follow-up notifications, does not imply any assumption of responsibility for the information transmitted, which remains with the member state submitting the follow-up notification. 4.2.5. response to follow-up notifications member states may respond to any follow-up notifications regarding their own notification(s) by starting a discussion on the online collaborative space put at the disposal of member states for the exchange of information (see part ii chapter 5.3.2). this ensures that the response is visible to all members of rapex. 4.3. actors and roles involved in follow-up activities the parties involved in the follow-up notification process and their responsibilities therein are the following: 4.3.1. economic operators (35) economic operators are not directly involved in the submission of follow-up notifications. however, economic operators must cooperate with national authorities and provide them with any information concerning a product which is the subject of an existing notification in order to facilitate the creation and submission of follow-up notifications via the rapex application. 4.3.2. market surveillance authorities market surveillance authorities notify the european commission through the rapex application about any follow-up activities or other information regarding notifications. 4.3.3. european commission the european commission examines and validates follow-up notifications according to the specifications included in part ii, chapter 4.2. 4.4. workflow 4.4.1. creation and submission of a follow-up notification by a member state the rapex contact point is responsible for the submission of follow-up notifications via the rapex application. (see part ii, chapter 5.1). 4.4.2. examination of follow-up notifications by the commission 4.4.2.1. correctness and completeness the commission checks all follow-up notifications received through the rapex application before they are validated and transmitted to the member states. these checks focus on the correctness and completeness of the information provided. the commission checks if a follow-up notification meets all the relevant requirements set out in the gpsd and in these guidelines and if the correct procedure was applied. once the correctness of a follow-up notification is confirmed, the commission checks its completeness. chapter 4.2.2 of these guidelines is to be used as a point of reference for this examination. the commission pays special attention to follow-up notifications containing risk assessments. it verifies, in particular, that the risk description is complete, clearly presented and well documented, and that the risk assessment clearly relates to the product covered by a notification. 4.4.2.2. requests for additional information before validating a follow-up notification, the commission may request the reacting member state to provide additional information or clarification within a given deadline. validation of a follow-up notification may be conditional upon receipt of the data requested. the commission may request the opinion of any member state and, in particular, the notifying member state on a validated follow-up notification. the member state submits its opinion to the commission within a deadline specified by the latter. furthermore, the notifying member state informs the commission whether any changes to the notification (e.g. to the risk assessment) or to its status (e.g. permanent withdrawal from the system) are necessary. 4.4.3. validation and distribution of follow-up notifications all follow-up notifications assessed as correct and complete are validated and distributed by the commission according to the deadlines specified in appendix 5 to these guidelines. the commission does not validate follow-up notifications with a risk assessment different from that of the notification they refer to, if the risk assessment is not complete, clearly presented and well documented, or if it is not shown that the risk assessment was performed in relation to the product covered by the notification. 4.4.4. permanent withdrawal of a follow-up notification from rapex follow-up notifications distributed through the rapex application are kept in the system as long as the notification to which they are attached. the commission may permanently withdraw a validated follow-up notification from the rapex application if a notification to which this follow-up notification is attached has been withdrawn from rapex (in accordance with part ii, chapter 3.4.7.1.1 of these guidelines). furthermore, the commission may withdraw a validated follow-up notification where it clearly provides incorrect information, and in particular where: (a) the product found on the market by the reacting member state is different from the product covered by the notification; (b) the measures adopted by the reacting member state are successfully challenged in court or in other proceedings and subsequently withdrawn; (c) the risk assessment performed by the reacting member state is proven to be incorrect or relates to a different product from the one covered by the notification. the provisions of chapters 3.4.7.1.2 and 3.4.7.1.3 apply. once the commission decides to withdraw a follow-up notification it is removed from rapex (or otherwise made invisible to users of the system). the commission informs all member states of the withdrawal of a follow-up notification via the online collaborative space referred to in part ii, chapter 5.3.2 or through other equally effective means. 4.5. deadlines for submitting follow-up notifications member states submit follow-up notifications to the commission as soon as possible and by the deadlines specified in appendix 4 to these guidelines at the latest. appropriate arrangements are established at national level concerning the transmission of information between all competent authorities and the rapex contact point to ensure that the deadlines are met. (see part ii, chapter 5.1). the deadlines apply irrespective of any appeal procedure or official publication requirement. 4.6. requests for confidentiality a reacting member state may request confidentiality in its follow-up notification. such requests clearly state which part(s) of the follow-up notification should be kept confidential. furthermore, all requests for confidentiality are accompanied by justification clearly stating the reasons. requests for confidentiality are examined by the commission to determine that they are justified (i.e. in line with the provisions of the gpsd and these guidelines) and complete (i.e. it states which parts of the form that it covers and if it contains a justification). the final decision on confidentiality is taken by the commission after consultation of the responsible rapex contact point. (see part ii, chapter 5.1). the commission and the member states treat follow-up notifications with requests for confidentiality in the same way as the other follow-up notifications. the confidentiality of a follow-up notification or parts of it does not prevent it from being distributed through the rapex application to the competent national authorities. however, neither the commission nor the member states should disclose any parts of a follow-up notification that are confidential to the public. this information is confidential and therefore cannot be published in any form. the member state submitting the follow-up notification withdraws its request for confidentiality immediately after it becomes aware that the reasons for such a request are no longer valid. the commission informs all member states of the withdrawal of the confidentiality after the receipt of such a request from the reacting member state. 5. rapex networks 5.1. rapex national contact points each member state establishes a single rapex contact point to operate rapex at national level. the member states decide within which national authority to set up the rapex contact point. each member state also organises its national rapex network to ensure the efficient flow of information between the national contact point and the various authorities participating in rapex. (see part i chapter 5.4 and part ii, chapter 1.2). 5.1.1. organisation each member state gives the national contact point the resources and information it needs to perform its tasks and, in particular, to operate the system with effective back-up/business continuity. the rapex contact point has a separate email account for rapex, accessible to all officials in that contact point (e.g. rapex@ ). professional or private email accounts of officials in charge of the rapex contact point should not be used as the email account of the rapex contact point. the rapex contact point also has a direct phone number through which it can be reached during and outside working hours. 5.1.2. tasks the main tasks of the rapex contact point are to: (a) organise and steer the work of the national rapex network, in accordance with the rules set out in these guidelines; (b) train and assist all authorities in the network in the use of rapex; (c) ensure that all rapex tasks stemming from the gpsd and these guidelines are performed correctly and, in particular, that all required information (i.e. notifications, follow-up notifications, additional information, etc.) is provided to the commission without delay; (d) transmit information between the commission and the national market surveillance authorities and authorities in charge of external border controls; (e) check and validate the completeness of the information received from all authorities before transmission to the commission through the rapex application; (f) check before submitting a notification whether a product has already been notified or information on that product has been exchanged through the rapex application (to avoid any duplication); (g) participate in rapex contact point working group meetings and other events on the operation of rapex; (h) suggest possible improvements to the operation of the system; (i) inform the commission immediately of any technical problems with the functioning of the rapex application; (j) coordinate all national activities and initiatives carried out in relation to rapex; (k) explain to stakeholders how rapex operates and clarify their obligations, particularly for the business notification obligation set out in article 5(3) of the gpsd. 5.2. rapex networks established at eu and national levels 5.2.1. the rapex contact point network the commission organises and steers the work of the rapex contact point network. this network consists of all rapex contact points appointed in the member states and european economic area (eea) countries. the commission regularly convenes meetings of the rapex contact point network to discuss the operation of the system (e.g. to communicate the latest developments concerning rapex, to exchange experience and know-how), and to improve cooperation between the rapex contact points. 5.2.2. rapex networks established at national level the rapex contact points organise and steer the work of their own rapex national network. the network consists of: (a) the rapex contact point; (b) market surveillance authorities responsible for monitoring the safety of products; and (c) authorities in charge of external border controls. rapex contact points are encouraged to provide for the organisation and operation of the rapex national network so as to ensure that all the authorities involved are aware of their roles and responsibilities as regards the operation of rapex. this should be consistent with the information contained in these guidelines. the rapex contact points are encouraged to facilitate regular and continuous exchange of information and discussion with their national network in order to discuss with all the authorities involved how rapex is organised, how it operates and, if necessary, to give training courses. 5.3. rapex internal communication tools, practical and technical arrangements for rapex and best practice 5.3.1. languages the use of languages in notifications and follow-up notifications, as well as communications between the rapex contact points and the commission, must take account of the objectives of rapex and must ensure a rapid exchange of information between member states and the commission on products posing serious risks. to facilitate the work of the network, member states authorities are encouraged to use the existing ec etranslation webpage to ensure all member states understand what is being communicated through rapex. a link to this translation tool to submit documents or extracts from texts for translation from and into all eu languages (36) is available in the collaborative space. (see part ii, chapter 5.3.2). 5.3.2. rapex online tools (a) rapex system the commission has established and maintains a web-based application for use as a communication tool for the purpose of rapex. member states use this system to create and submit notifications and follow-up notifications through the rapex application, and the commission uses it to validate and distribute the documents it receives. the commission provides access to the system to all rapex contact points, competent national authorities and the relevant commission departments. the commission lays down the rules for granting access to the system and gives access to as many users as possible, taking into account needs and technical limitations. where the rapex system is temporarily not operational (for reasons other than regular and planned maintenance work), member states should only submit notifications of serious risks to the commission (i.e. article 12 notifications, article 12 notifications requiring emergency action or article 22 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008) notifications. the submission of other notifications and follow-up notifications is suspended until the rapex system is re-established. while the system is not operational, rapex notifications should be sent to the commission by email to: just-rapex@ec.europa.eu or to another email address communicated in advance. if email transmission is not possible, rapex notifications are sent to the commission by any other means considered appropriate (37). (b) product safety business alert gateway the product safety business alert gateway (also known as the business gateway) is intended to simplify the practical aspects of the obligation on producers and distributors, or their authorised representative, under article 5(3) of the gpsd to notify the competent national authorities of the member states if they know or ought to know, on the basis of the information in their possession and as professionals, that a product they have placed on the market is dangerous. the business gateway consists of two elements: (i) the notification template and (ii) the online database. the notification template is reserved for use by producers and distributors to inform the competent national authorities of the member states that a product they have placed on the market is dangerous, in line with their obligation under article 5(3) of the gpsd. the online database is intended for use by member states national authorities responsible for receiving notifications of dangerous consumer products submitted by producers and distributors. the competent national authority may use the information provided to submit a rapex notification if all criteria for this are met. (c) collaborative space the commission also manages a collaborative space to exchange information between the commission and the member states competent national authorities. this includes the eu consumer product safety platform, open to the rapex contact points and their colleagues working on product safety issues in the competent national authorities for all rapex-related issues. requests for access to the space must be made by the rapex contact points in the relevant member state and authorised by the commission. this space also includes a section, managed by the commission, containing useful tips and information on the functioning of rapex and input from the member states. (d) rag tool (38) the commission has developed this tool available on the rapex website to facilitate the risk assessment of products notified through the rapex system, in accordance with the principles laid down in appendix 6. 5.3.3. contact details the commission provides the rapex contact points with the contact details of the commission's rapex team, including names, email addresses and telephone numbers. the rapex contact points provide the commission with their contact details, including the names of officials working within the contact point, the name and address of the authority where the rapex contact point is established, the email addresses and phone numbers of officials. any changes to the contact details are immediately communicated to the commission by the rapex contact point. the commission publishes and updates a list of contact details of the rapex contact points on the rapex website. member states process contact details including personal data in application of the eu's data protection legislation. on the information exchange through rapex, member states should process personal data ensuring that it circulates and is distributed only as far as it is strictly necessary. 5.3.4. operation of rapex outside regular working hours rapex operates non-stop. the commission and the rapex contact points ensure that officials responsible for operating rapex can always be contacted (by phone, e-mail or other equally effective means) and that they can take whatever action is necessary, including in an emergency and outside regular working hours, such as weekends and holidays. the commission provides the rapex contact points with an emergency telephone number, which should be used to contact the commission rapex team outside of working hours, with priority over any other communication channels. the rapex contact points provide the commission with their contact details, including the phone numbers of officials who can be contacted during and outside working hours. any changes to the contact details are immediately communicated to the commission by the rapex contact points. part iii appendices 1. fields and information included in notifications (39) fields that will be published on the web are shaded. notification form section 1: general information case number creation date validation/distribution date notification type * notifying country full contact details of the notifying authority * section 2: product professional / consumer product product category * oecd portal category (if known) product (what the product is) * name * brand * type/number of model: * batch number/bar code * customs code * product and packaging description * total number of items covered by the notification (if known) * photos: section 3: regulations and standards applicable legal provisions (directive, decision, regulation, etc.) * standards * proof of conformity * is the product counterfeit? * certificates section 4: traceability country of origin (where the product manufactured) * countries of destination * full contact details of the manufacturer or its representative(s) * full contact details of the exporter(s) * full contact details of the importer(s) * full contact details of the distributor(s) * full contact details of the retailer(s) * is the product (also) sold online? please give details: url section 5: risk assessment risk category * risk level summary of test results * description of the technical issue that leads to the highest risk level risk description (how the technical defect leads to the risk) * eu legal provisions and /or standards against which the product was tested and did not comply with * information on known incidents and accidents * section 6: measures type of measures adopted * if voluntary: type of economic operator taking notified measure(s) * name of economic operator taking notified measure(s) * if compulsory: name of authority ordering the notified measure(s) * type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered * category of measures * date of entry into force * duration * scope * has the notification been sent by a producer or a distributor under article 5(3) of the gpsd? * url link to company recall page (if available) section 7: confidentiality is the notification confidential? * scope of confidentiality justification section 8: other additional information justification for sending notification for information annexes photos (products, packaging and label) certificates test report and risk assessment notification sent by an economic operator through business gateway adopted measures * indicates a mandatory field. 2. fields and information included in follow-up notifications (40) fields that will be published on the web are shaded. section 1: general information case number validated notification type notifying country creation date validation/distribution date submission number follow up notification number reacting country full contact details of the notifying authority validated notification product category notified product notified name product (what the product is) name (on the product or the packaging) brand (on the product or the packaging) type/number of model batch number/bar code (or other information to identify which products are affected) photos (products, packaging and label) section 2: type of follow-up notification product found * total number of items found (if known) * measures adopted / measures not adopted type of measures adopted * if voluntary: type of economic operator taking notified measure(s) * name of economic operator taking notified measure(s) * if compulsory: name of authority ordering the notified measure(s) * type of economic operator to whom the measure(s) were ordered * category of measures * date of entry into force * duration * scope * adopted measures url link to company recall page (if available): different risk assessment * risk category * summary of the test results (description of technical defects) * indication of legal provisions and standards (with clauses) against which the product was tested * different risk assessment * information on known incidents and accidents * attachments (certificates, test report and risk assessment ) additional information * complementary information on distribution channels and/or product's origin complementary information on the risk assessment other complementary information section 3: confidentiality is the follow-up confidential? * scope of confidentiality justification annexes photos (product, packaging and label) test reports and risk assessments certificates adopted measures * indicates a mandatory field 3. notification scheme notification for information (if relevant) (1) enough identification information? notification encouraged product covered by regulation (ec) no 765/2008? (3) information involving new risk? notification for information encouraged product covered by regulation (ec) no 765/2008 (3) notification for information recommended article 12 gpsd/22 regulation (ec) no 765/2008 notification risk level established and measure adopted? enough identification information? article 11 gpsd notification notification for information cross-border effect? (2) voluntary means? cross-border effect? (2) serious risk? no yes no no no yes no no no ongoing yes no yes yes no yes yes yes yes yes (1) to be upgraded when a measure is adopted. (2) the notion of cross-border effect should be interpreted in a broad sense (see part ii chapter 6.1 of these guidelines). (3) see part i, chapter 3.1 of these guidelines. 4. deadlines for member states member states are required to act within the deadlines indicated unless duly justified notification procedure action deadline notifications send article 12 notification requiring emergency action within 3 days after: adoption or decision to adopt compulsory measures, or receipt of information on voluntary measures. send article 12 notification or article 22 regulation (ec) no 765/2008 notification within 10 days after: adoption or decision to adopt compulsory measures, or receipt of information on voluntary measures. confirm measures if the notification was sent before deciding to adopt measures within 45 days after submission of the notification update to a notification within 5 days after receipt of the information on developments requiring changes to a notification follow-up notifications ensure follow-up activities to: article 12 notification requiring emergency action within 20 days after receipt of a notification article 12 notification and to notification sent by the european commission as well as article 22 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 notification within 45 days after receipt of a notification send follow-up notification to: article 12 notification requiring emergency action within 3 days after: the notified product was found on the market, or the completion of a risk assessment with different results, or receipt of additional information article 12 notification and to notification sent by the european commission as well as article 22 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 notification within 5 days after: the notified product was found on the market, or the completion of a risk assessment with different results, or receipt of additional information update to a follow-up notification within 5 days after receipt of information or developments requiring changes to a follow-up notification notification procedure established under article 11 of the gpsd notifications send article 11 notification within 10 days after adoption of compulsory measures update to the notification within 5 days after receipt of information on developments requiring changes to the notification 5. deadlines for the commission notification procedure action deadline eu rapid information system rapex established under article 12 of the gpsd notifications validate article 12 notification requiring emergency action within 3 days after receipt of a notification validate article 12 notification as well as article 22 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 notification within 5 days after receipt of a notification validate notification for information within 10 days after receipt of a notification follow-up notifications validate follow-up notification sent to article 12 notification requiring emergency action within 3 days after receipt of a follow-up notification validate follow-up notification sent to article 12 notification and to notification sent by the european commission as well as article 22 of regulation (ec) no 765/2008 notification within 5 days after receipt of a follow-up notification validate follow-up notification sent to notification for information within 10 days after receipt of a follow-up notification notification procedure established under article 11 of the gpsd notifications validate article 11 notification within 10 days after receipt of a notification follow-up notifications validate follow-up notifications sent to article 11 notification within 10 days after receipt of a follow-up notification risk assessment guidelines for consumer products (41) 1. introduction consumer products may cause harm when used, e.g. a hot flat-iron that can cause burns, scissors or knives that can cause cuts, or a household cleaner that can damage the skin. this kind of damage is not a usual occurrence because general knowledge or instructions teach how to use consumer products safely. nevertheless, the risk of damage remains. this risk can be assessed in different ways. a range of methods have been used to quantify risk for consumer products, such as a nomograph method (42), a matrix method (43), and the method previously recommended for the eu's rapex rapid alert system (44). while the general principles for risk assessment have always been agreed, how to quantify risks has been under permanent development. this has led to diverging results and ensuing discussions, as well as to consideration of what the best possible practice might be. the purpose of these risk assessment guidelines is therefore to improve the situation and, within the framework of the directive on general product safety (45), to provide a transparent and practicable method for appropriate use by member states' competent authorities when they assess the risks of non-food consumer products. these guidelines are based on a risk assessment method developed for other purposes, adapted to the specific requirements of non-food consumer products. a certain amount of training will of course be needed before these guidelines can be put into practice, but expertise in risk assessment will greatly facilitate this task. this will be backed by exchanges of views between risk assessors, since expertise and experience accumulated through the years is invaluable. in building up a risk assessment method in small, manageable steps, these guidelines help to focus on the relevant issues of a product, its user(s) and its use(s), and to identify possible divergences of views between risk assessors from the onset, thus avoiding time-consuming discussions. they should thus lead to consistent and robust risk assessment results based on evidence and science, and consequently to widely acceptable consensus on the risks that the many non-food consumer products may present. a quick overview and a flow chart on how to prepare a risk assessment pursuant to these guidelines is provided in section 5 consumer products mean non-food consumer products throughout these guidelines. these guidelines do not set out to replace other guidelines that may address very specific products or may be specifically provided for in legislation, such as in the area of chemicals, cosmetics, pharmaceuticals or medical devices. it is highly recommended to use this specific guidance, since it is tailor-made, but it will always be for the risk assessor to decide how best to assess the risks of a product. nor are these guidelines to be used by manufacturers just to avoid serious risks when designing and manufacturing products. consumer products have to be safe, and these guidelines aim at helping authorities to identify serious risks when, despite the best efforts of the manufacturer, a product is not safe. 2. risk assessment an overview 2.1. risk combination of hazard and probability risk is generally understood as something that threatens the health or even the lives of people, or that may cause considerable material damage. nevertheless, people take risks while being aware of the possible damage, because the damage does not always happen. for example: climbing a ladder always includes the possibility of falling off and injuring oneself. falling off is therefore built into the ladder; it is an intrinsic part of using a ladder and cannot be excluded. falling off is thus called the intrinsic hazard of a ladder. this hazard, however, does not always materialise, since many people climb ladders without falling off and injuring themselves. this suggests that there is a certain likelihood (or probability), but no certainty, of the intrinsic hazard materialising. whereas the hazard always exists, the probability of it materialising can be minimised, for example by the person climbing the ladder being careful. using a household cleaner with sodium hydroxide to free blocked sewage water pipes always entails the possibility of very severe damage to the skin, if the product comes into contact with skin, or even of permanent blindness if drops of the product get into the eye. this is because sodium hydroxide is very corrosive, meaning that the cleaner is intrinsically hazardous. nevertheless, when the cleaner is handled properly, the hazard does not materialise. proper handling may include wearing plastic gloves and protective glasses. skin and eyes are then protected, and the probability of damage is much reduced. risk is thus the combination of the severity of possible damage to the consumer and the probability that this damage should occur. 2.2. a risk assessment in three steps it takes three steps to determine the risk: 1. anticipate an injury scenario in which the intrinsic product hazard harms the consumer (see table 1). determine how severe the consumer's injury is. a yardstick for quantifying the intrinsic product hazard is the extent of the adverse effect that it can cause to the health of a consumer. the risk assessor therefore anticipates an injury scenario that describes step by step how the hazard leads to the injury of a consumer (see table 2). in short, the injury scenario describes the accident that the consumer has with the product in question, and the severity of the consumer's injury caused by that accident. an injury can vary in severity, depending on the hazard of the product, on the way the product is used by the consumer, on the type of consumer who uses the product, and much more (see section 3). the more severe the injury, the more severe the hazard that caused it, and vice versa. the severity of the injury is therefore a means of quantifying the hazard. these guidelines propose 4 levels of severity, from injuries that are normally completely reversible to very serious injuries that cause more than approximately 10 % of permanent disability or even death (see table 3). 2. determine the probability of the consumer being injured in practice by the intrinsic product hazard. while the injury scenario describes how the consumer is injured by the hazard, the scenario only happens with a certain probability. the probability can be expressed as a fraction, such as > 50 % or > 1/1 000 (see left-hand side of table 4). 3. combine the hazard (in terms of severity of the injury) with the probability (in terms of a fraction) to obtain the risk. this combination can be made by looking up both values in the appropriate table (see table 4); the table will provide the level of risk in terms of serious, high, medium and low risk. where different injury scenarios are foreseeable, the risk for each of those scenarios should be determined the highest risk being labelled as the risk of the product. the highest risk is normally crucial because only action on the highest risk can effectively provide a high level of protection. on the other hand, an identified risk may be lower than the highest risk, but require specific risk reduction action. it is then important also to take measures against that risk so that all risks are effectively reduced. once the three steps have been carried out, the risk assessment is basically complete. a flow chart on building a risk assessment is at the end of section 5. 2.3. some useful tips seek information as can be seen from the examples of chapter 2.1, each of the three steps of a risk assessment (see point 2.2) requires anticipation of what might happen and how likely it is to happen, since the product under consideration will normally not have caused an accident, and thus the risk will not have materialised (yet). previous experience with similar products will help in this exercise, as will any other information about the product, such as design, mechanical stability, chemical composition, operation, instructions for use, including possible risk management advice, type of consumers it is intended for (and those for which it is not), test reports, accident statistics, the eu injury database (idb) (46), information about consumer complaints, about the behaviour of different consumers when they are using the product, and about product recalls. product requirements laid down in legislation, in product standards or in checklists (such as in iso 14121: safety of machinery risk assessment) can also be useful sources of information. nevertheless, the products to be assessed may be quite specific and thus these sources may not contain the information required. the information collected may also be incomplete, inconsistent, or not fully plausible. this may be the case in particular for accident statistics, when only the product category is registered. the absence of an accident history, a small number of accidents or low severity of accidents should not be taken as a presumption of low risk. product-specific statistics also have to be viewed with great care, since the product may have changed over time, be it in design or composition. the information must always be critically assessed. feedback from expert colleagues can be particularly useful, since they can draw from their real-life experience and pro vide suggestions that are not immediately obvious when assessing a product risk. they may also give advice when assessing the risk for different types of consumers, including vulnerable consumers such as children (see table 1), since the latter may handle a product differently. they may also help to assess the risk for different injuries that a product may cause, and the way in which those injuries emerge through the use of the product. they can also judge whether an injury scenario is totally unperceived, too unlikely, and then guide the risk assessor towards more realistic assumptions. thus, feedback from experienced colleagues, although not an obligation, can be helpful in several aspects. a risk assessor from an authority could seek advice from colleagues in that same authority, in other authorities, in industry, in other countries, in scientific groupings, and elsewhere. conversely, any risk assessor in industry could use his contacts with authorities and others when a new or improved product is to be assessed before it is placed on the market. new information obtained should of course be used to update any existing risk assessment. make a sensitivity analysis of your risk assessment if all information searches and queries to expert colleagues do not provide the required, very specific data, a so-called sensitivity analysis might help. in this analysis a lower and a higher value than previously chosen is assumed for each parameter of the risk assessment, and taken through the entire risk assessment procedure. the resulting risk levels will show how sensitive the risk level reacts to the input of lower and higher values. in this way the range in which the real risk of the product will be can be estimated. if the most likely value of each parameter can be estimated, then those most likely values should be taken through the procedure, and the resulting risk level will be the most likely risk. an example of a sensitivity analysis is illustrated in section 6. let others check your risk assessment feedback from colleagues will also help when finalising the risk assessment. they will be able to provide advice on the assumptions and estimations made during the three steps referred to in point 2.2. they will feed in their experience and thus help to generate a more robust, more solid, more transparent and ultimately more acceptable risk assessment. it is therefore recommended that, ideally, advice be sought from expert colleagues, possibly in the form of a group discussion, before concluding a risk assessment. these groups, of perhaps 3 to 5 members, should include a combination of expertise appropriate to the product under assessment: engineers, chemists, (micro-)biologists, statisticians, product safety managers, and others. group discussion will be particularly useful when a product is new on the market and has never been assessed before. risk assessments should be solid and realistic. however, since they require a number of assumptions, different risk assessors may come to different conclusions in view of the data and other evidence they have been able to find or because of their diverging experience. it is thus necessary for risk assessors to talk to one another in order to reach agreement or, at least, consensus. the step-by-step risk assessment described in these guidelines, however, should make such discussions more productive. each step in a risk assessment must be clearly described in detail. thus, any point of disagreement can be quickly identified, and consensus can more easily be reached. this will make risk assessments more acceptable. document your risk assessment it is important to document your risk assessment, describing the product and all the parameters that you chose while developing it, such as test results, the type(s) of consumers you chose for your injury scenario(s), and the probabilities with the underlying data and assumptions. this will enable you to demonstrate unambiguously how you estimated the level of risk, and it will also help you to update your assessment while keeping track of all changes. several hazards, several injuries but only one risk when several hazards, several injury scenarios or differing severities of injuries or probabilities have been identified, each of those should be carried through the entire risk assessment procedure in order to determine the risk for each. as a result, the product may have several risk levels. the overall risk of the product is then the highest risk level identified, because action on the highest risk level is normally the most effective way of risk reduction. only in special cases may a less-than-highest risk be considered particularly important, since it may require specific risk management measures. as an example of several risks, a hammer may have a weak head and a weak grip, each of which may break when the hammer is used, and the consumer may be injured. if the relevant scenarios lead to different risk levels, the highest risk should be reported as the risk of the hammer. it could be argued that: the apparently most significant hazard should be decisive, since it would lead to the most severe injuries. in the example of the hammer in point 2.1, this could be the hammer head breaking, since pieces of the broken head could fly into one's eye, possibly blinding the user. the hammer grip breaking, on the other hand, would never split into small pieces that could do as much damage to the eyes; however, this would be a hazard assessment, not a risk assessment. a risk assessment also looks at the probability of an injury actually happening. thus, the most significant hazard might cause an injury that is much less likely than a lesser hazard, and therefore present a lower risk. conversely, a scenario leading to a less severe injury may be much more likely than a scenario resulting in death, and the less severe injury may therefore present a higher risk; the highest probability for an injury scenario to happen should be the decisive factor for the risk of the product. in the example of the hammer in point 2.1, if the hammer grip is very weak, the most likely injury scenario would be from the grip breaking, and that should therefore be decisive. however, this would not consider the seriousness of eye injuries that the hammer head breaking could cause. looking at probability alone would not therefore give the whole picture. in conclusion, risk is a balanced combination of both the hazard and the probability of the injury that the hazard can cause. risk describes neither the hazard, nor the probability, but both at the same time. taking the highest risk as the risk of the product will ensure the most effective product safety (apart from specific risks requiring specific risk management, as referred to at the beginning of this section. can risks cumulate? several injury scenarios leading to several risks can be developed for virtually every product. for example, an angle grinder may present the risk of an electric shock, because electrical wires may be too exposed, and the risk of fire, because the machine may overheat and ignite during normal use. if both risks are considered to be high, do they add up to the grinder posing an overall serious risk? where several risks are linked to the same product, one of them is obviously more likely to materialise and causes an injury. the overall likelihood of an injury is therefore greater. this does not mean that the overall risk is automatically higher, however: the overall probability is not calculated by simply adding up probabilities. more complex calculations are necessary, and these always result in a probability that is lower than the sum of all probabilities. there is difference of a factor of 10 between two succeeding probability levels (table 4). this means that a lot of different scenarios of the same level would be needed to result in higher overall probability (and possibly risk). probability values are estimations which may not be totally accurate, as they often err on the safe side in order to ensure a high level of protection. it is therefore more useful to look at a more accurate estimation of the probability of a scenario leading to the highest risk than to add up rough estimations of probabilities of all sorts of scenarios. with a little effort hundreds of injury scenarios could be developed. if risks were simply added together, the overall risk would depend on the number of injury scenarios generated and could increase endlessly. this does not make sense. thus, risks are not simply cumulated. however, if more than one relevant risk exists, action to manage the risks may need to be taken more rapidly or may need to be more pronounced. for example, with two risks, a product may need to be immediately taken off the market and recalled, whereas, with a single risk, halting sales could be sufficient. risk management depends on many factors, not only on the number of risks that a product may present at one and the same time. thus, consideration is given to the link between risk and risk management (section 4). compliance with limit values in legislation and standards in market surveillance, consumer products are often tested against limit values or requirements laid down in legislation and in product safety standards. a product that complies with the limit value(s) or requirement(s) (47) is presumed to be safe in terms of the safety characteristics covered by those value(s) or requirement(s). this assumption can be made because the risks of a product from its intended and reasonably foreseeable use are taken into account when establishing the limit value(s) or requirement(s). manufacturers thus need their products to comply with these values or requirements, because they then only have to look at risks with their products that are not be covered by those limit value(s) or requirement(s). an example of a limit value in: legislation is the limit of 5 mg/kg benzene in toys which must not be exceeded, as per point 5 of annex xvii, to the reach regulation (48), as amended by commission regulation (ec) no 552/2009 (49); a standard is the small parts cylinder: small parts of a toy for children under 36 months must not fit entirely into the cylinder described in the toys standard (50). if they do, they present a risk; the product is presumed not to be safe where it fails to comply with established limit values. for limit values laid down in: legislation, such as on cosmetics or restrictions on marketing and use, the product must not be made available on the market; standards, the manufacturer may nevertheless try to provide evidence that his product is as safe as if it were compliant with the standard's limit value by way of a fully-fledged risk assessment on his product. however, this may require more effort, and may be impossible in cases such as the small parts cylinder referred to in the first bullet of this list, than actually manufacturing the product in compliance with the standard's limit value. non-compliance with limit values does not automatically mean that the product presents a serious risk (which is the highest risk level covered by these guidelines). therefore, to ensure appropriate risk reduction measures, a risk assessment will be required for those parts of a product that do not comply with or are not covered by legislation or a standard. furthermore, some products, such as cosmetics, require a risk assessment even when they are compliant with the limit values laid down in legislation. this risk assessment should provide evidence of the safety of the whole product (51). in conclusion, compliance with limit values in legislation or in standards provides presumption of safety, but such compliance may not be sufficient. specific risk assessment guidelines in specific cases for chemicals there are specific instructions on how to prepare a risk assessment (52), and therefore they are not dealt with in detail in these guidelines. nevertheless, they follow the same principles as for normal consumer products: hazard identification and assessment this is the same as determining the severity of the injury, as described in section 2.2; exposure assessment in this step, exposure is expressed as the likely dose of the chemical that the consumer may take up via oral, inhalation or dermal routes, separately or jointly, when using the product as anticipated in the injury scenario. this step is the same as determining the probability that the injury will indeed occur; risk characterisation this step basically consists of comparing the dose of the chemical that the consumer is likely to take up (= exposure) with the derived no-effect level (dnel) of that chemical. should the exposure be sufficiently lower than the dnel, in other words, should the risk characterisation ratio (rcr) be clearly below 1, risk is considered to be adequately controlled. this is the same as determining the risk level. risk management measures may not be needed if the level of risk is sufficiently low. since a chemical may possess several hazards, risk is normally determined for the leading health effect, which is the health effect (or endpoint such as acute toxicity, irritation, sensitisation, carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, toxicity for reproduction) considered to be the most important. for cosmetics, there is also specific guidance (53), and there may be specific guidance for other products or purposes. it is highly recommended to use such specific guidance, since it is tailored to the specific cases in question. nevertheless, where the data required by the specific guidance do not exist or cannot be estimated the present guidelines may be used for a preliminary risk assessment. this risk assessment will have to be carried out with due care and attention in order to avoid any misinterpretation. 3. building a risk assessment step by step this section describes in detail what points have to be taken into account and what questions have to be asked when preparing a risk assessment. 3.1. the product the product should be identified unambiguously. this includes the product name, the brand, the model name, the type number, a possible production lot number, any certificate that may come with the product, a child-resistant fastening if there is one, the identity of the person who placed it on the market, and the country of origin. a picture of the product, the packaging and the marking plate (if appropriate) and a test report(s) identifying the product hazard(s) can also be considered to be part of the product description. in particular cases, the hazard may be limited to a distinct part of the product, which can be separate from it and also separately available to consumers. in such cases, it is sufficient only to assess the distinct part of the product. recharge able batteries of notebook computers which may overheat are an example of this. the description of the product includes any label that may be relevant for risk assessment, in particular warning labels. instructions for use may also contain relevant information on the risk of the product and how to keep it as low as possible, for example by using personal protective equipment or by excluding children from using the product. an example of this is a chain saw. products may also need to be self-assembled by consumers before use, such as self-assembled furniture. are the assembly instructions clear enough for the ready-to-use product to meet all the relevant safety requirements? or could consumers make mistakes when putting the product together that could lead to unforeseen risks? a risk assessment should always consider the entire life time of a product. this is particularly important when a new product has been developed and its risks are assessed. will age and usage change the type or the extent of the hazard? will new hazards appear with increasing product age or perhaps through reasonably foreseeable inappropriate use? how long is the time to product failure? what is the product's lifetime, including shelf life? how long is the product used in practice by the consumer before it becomes waste? additional considerations may need to be taken into account when a product becomes unusable after a certain time period, even though it has never been used. examples are electric blankets or heating pads. the electric cords in the products are usually thin and become fragile after ten years, even if the product has never been used. the heating cords can come into contact with each other, can cause a short-circuit and set the bedclothes on fire. finally, the packaging of the product should also be included in any risk assessment. 3.2. the product hazard hazard is the intrinsic property of the product that may cause an injury to the consumer who uses the product. it can appear in different forms: mechanical hazard, such as sharp edges that can cut fingers, or tight openings in which someone can trap their fingers; choking hazard, such as from small parts that come loose from a toy, which may be swallowed by a child and make the child choke; suffocation hazard, such as from the drawstrings of an anorak hood which may lead to strangulation; electrical hazard, such as from live electrical parts that can cause an electric shock; heat or fire hazard, such as a heater fan that overheats, catches fire and causes burns; thermal hazard, such as the hot outer surface of an oven that can cause a burn; chemical hazard, such as a toxic substance that can poison a consumer immediately upon ingestion, or a carcinogenic substance that can cause cancer in the long term. some chemicals may damage the consumer only after repeated exposure; microbiological hazard, such as a bacteriological contamination of cosmetics which may cause a skin infection; noise hazard, such as ring tones from toy mobile phones that are much too loud and can damage children's hearing capacity; other hazards, such as explosion, implosion, sonic and ultrasonic pressure, fluid pressure, or radiation from laser sources. for the purpose of these guidelines, hazards have been grouped, linked to the size, shape and surface of a product, to potential, kinetic or electric energy, to extreme temperatures, and others, as shown in table 2. the table is for guidance only, and any risk assessor should adapt the scenario to the product under consideration. of course not every type of hazard applies to every product. nevertheless, table 2 should help risk assessors to look for and identify all possible hazards in consumer products that are being assessed. where a product has several hazards, each hazard should be taken separately with its own risk assessment and the highest risk identified as the risk of the product. of course, risks requiring specific risk management measures should also be reported, to ensure that all risks can be reduced. note that a single hazard may lead to several injuries in the same scenario. for example, malfunctioning brakes on a motor cycle could cause an accident and result in damage to the driver's head, hands and legs, and could even cause burns if the petrol bursts into flames in the accident. in this case, all injuries would belong to the same injury scenario, and the severity of all injuries together would have to be estimated. of course, these injuries together are very serious. several injuries in different scenarios should, however, not be added. in the daily practice of market surveillance, it may be sufficient to assess the risk from even a single hazard. if the risk from that hazard provides for risk management action, that action can be taken without further ado. nevertheless, the risk assessor should be sure that the risk identified is (one of) the highest risk(s), to ensure that the risk management action is sufficiently effective. this is always the case when the risk is serious, since this is the highest possible risk level proposed in these guidelines. in cases of less than serious risk, however, further risk assessments might be necessary and possibly specific risk management at a later stage. in conclusion, experience with risk assessment in market surveillance practice will limit the number of required risk assessments to a minimum. hazard identification by tests and standards hazards are often identified and quantified by tests. these tests and how to carry them out may be laid down in european or international product standards. compliance of a product with a harmonised european standard (en ), of which the references have been published in the official journal, provides presumption of safety (albeit only for the safety characteristics covered by the value(s) or standard(s)). it can be presumed in such cases that the product presents only a minimum risk and a high level of protection with regard to the specific hazard tested. nevertheless, there may be instances where presumption of safety is not the case, and in such cases a particularly well-documented risk assessment will have to be prepared, including a call for amendment to the harmonised standard. on the other hand, if a product fails the test, a risk can normally be assumed, unless the manufacturer can provide evidence that the product is safe. products may still present a risk even though they do not cause injuries products may not be hazardous but can nevertheless cause a risk, due to not being fit for their intended use. examples of this can be observed in the area of personal protective equipment or life-saving equipment, such as reflective jackets that car drivers put on after an accident. these jackets are meant to get the attention of oncoming drivers and traffic participants to warn them of the accident, in particular at night. however, they might not be seen if the reflector stripes are too small or do not reflect sufficiently, and do not therefore protect users as they should. these jackets therefore pose a risk even though they are not hazardous in themselves. another example is a sunscreen product which displays high protection (sun protection factor of 30) on the label but provides only low protection (factor of 6). this can lead to severe sunburn. 3.3. the consumer the abilities and behaviour of the consumer using the product may greatly influence the level of risk. it is therefore of prime importance to have a clear idea of the type of consumer pictured in the injury scenario. it may be necessary to generate injury scenarios with different types of consumers in order to identify the highest risk and thus the risk of the product. it is not enough, for example, to consider only the most vulnerable consumers, because the probability of their suffering adverse effects in the scenario may be so low that the risk is lower than in an injury scenario with a non-vulnerable consumer. consideration should also be given to people who are not actually using the product, but who may be in the vicinity of the user. for example, a chain saw may cause splinters to fly around and hit a bystander in the eye. thus, although the risk from the chain saw may be effectively managed by the user him- or herself wearing protective equipment and complying with any other risk management measures specified by the manufacturer, bystanders may be under serious threat. consequently, warnings should be given, for example in the chain saw instructions for use, about the risks to bystanders and how to minimise such risks. thus, when developing an injury scenario, the following aspects should be taken into account regarding the type of consumer and how they use the product. this is not a complete list, but it should encourage risk assessors to describe their injury scenarios with the necessary level of detail. it should be noted that consumer also means people who are not actually using the product, but who may be affected by virtue of being nearby: intended/non-intended user: the intended user of a product may use the product with ease because he goes by the instructions or because he is familiar with this kind of product, including its apparent and non-apparent hazard(s). the hazard of the product may not then materialise, and the product risk could be minor. the non-intended user may not be familiar with the product and may not recognise the hazard(s). he therefore runs the risk of injury, and the consumer risk is thus higher. thus, the risk may be different for an intended and a non-intended user, depending on the product and the way it is used. vulnerable consumers: several categories of vulnerable and very vulnerable consumers can be distinguished: children (0 to 36 months, > 36 months to < 8 years, 8 to 14 years) and others such as the elderly (see table 1). they all have less capacity to recognise a hazard, for example children who, when touching a hot surface, notice the heat only after some 8 seconds (and then are already burnt), whereas adults notice heat immediately. vulnerable consumers may also have problems taking account of warning labels, or may have particular problems using a product they have never used before. they may also act in a way that makes them more exposed, for example young children crawling and mouthing. children may also be attracted to products because of their appeal, which makes them a high risk in the hands of children. on the other hand, supervision by parents or other adults should normally prevent children from running straight into trouble. furthermore, consumers who are not usually vulnerable may become vulnerable in specific situations, for example when the instructions or warnings on a product are in a foreign language that the consumer does not understand. finally, in the particular case of chemicals, children may be more susceptible to the toxicity of chemicals than the average adult. therefore, children should not be treated as if they were small adults. in conclusion, a product that is normally safe for an average adult may not be safe for vulnerable consumers. this has to be taken into account when determining the severity and probability of an injury (see section 3.5) and thus the risk. intended and reasonably foreseeable use: consumers may use a product for other purposes than the one for which it is intended, although the instructions are clearly understandable, including any warnings. therefore, as warnings may not be fully effective, other uses than the intended ones also have to be taken into account in a risk assessment. this aspect is particularly important for the manufacturer of a product, since he has to ensure that the product is safe under any reasonably foreseeable conditions of use. reasonably foreseeable use may have to be based on experience, because there may be no information available in official accident statistics or other sources of information. it may then be difficult to draw the line between reasonably foreseeable and totally unperceived scenarios. nevertheless, even totally unperceived scenarios can be considered under these guidelines, even when they lead to very severe injuries, because such scenarios will always have very low probability. this possibly safeguards against such scenarios having too much of an influence in determining the overall risk of the product. frequency and duration of use: different consumers may use a product often or not so often, and for longer or shorter periods of time. this depends on the attractiveness of the product and the ease with which it can be used. daily or long-term use could make a consumer entirely familiar with a product and its specifics, including its hazards, instructions and warning labels, thus making the risk minor. on the other hand, daily or long-term use may make the consumer too used to the product and lead to user fatigue where he recklessly ignores instructions and warnings, thus increasing the risk. finally, daily or long-term use may also accelerate product ageing, and any parts that cannot withstand such frequent use may quickly fail and cause a hazard, and possibly an injury, which also increases the risk. hazard recognition and protective behaviour and equipment: some products are known for their hazards, such as scissors, knives, do-it-yourself drilling machines, chain saws, roller blades, bicycles, motor bikes and cars. in all these cases, the product hazard is clearly known or readily recognisable, or described in the instructions, which will include risk management measures. the consumer can then act carefully or use personal protective equipment such as gloves, helmets or seat-belts, thereby using the product in a way that minimises the risk. in other cases, the product hazard may not be so readily recognisable, such as a short-circuit within an electric iron, warning labels may be overlooked or misunderstood, and consumers will only rarely be able to take preventive measures. consumer behaviour in the event of an incident: where the hazard impinges on the consumer it may cause injury. it is thus important for a risk assessment to consider how the consumer may react. will he put the product to one side calmly and take preventive action, such as combating a fire caused by the product, or will he throw it away in a panic? vulnerable consumers, especially children, may after all not behave the same as other, non-vulnerable consumers. the consumer's cultural background and the way a product is used in his home country may influence the risk of a product. manufacturers in particular have to take account of these cultural differences when launching a new product on a market. manufacturers' experience in this area can thus be a valuable source of information for authorities preparing a risk assessment. 3.4. injury scenario: steps leading to injury(ies) most injury scenarios consist of the following three main steps: 1. the product has a defect or can lead to a dangerous situation during its foreseeable lifetime; 2. the defect or dangerous situation results in an accident; 3. the accident results in an injury. these three main steps can be divided into further steps to show how the product hazard can lead to injury and the like. nevertheless, these steps to injury have to be clear and concise, and not exaggerate the detail or the number of steps. with experience, it will be increasingly easier to identify the conditions for the occurrence of any given injury and the shortest path to injury (or critical path to injury). it is probably easiest to start with a scenario with the consumer for whom the product is intended where the consumer uses the product as per the instructions or, if there are none, according to normal handling and use. if this assessment produces the highest risk level, there is normally no need to carry out further assessments, and appropriate risk reduction measures can be taken. similarly, where an incident is reported in a specific consumer complaint, a single injury scenario may be sufficient to conclude as to appropriate risk reduction measures. otherwise, further scenarios could be developed to include vulnerable consumers, in particular children (see table 1), slight or more pronounced deviations from normal use, use under different climate conditions, such as very cold or very hot, unfavourable conditions of use, such as without proper daylight or illumination, use as suggested when the product was sold (for instance, a lamp sold in a toy shop should also be assessed for its risk when used by a child), use over the entire life-time (including wear and tear), etc. each scenario should be considered through the entire risk assessment procedure. where the product displays several hazards, injury and thus risk scenarios should be developed for each of them. nevertheless, a plausibility check as to whether an injury scenario might lead to a risk requiring action can limit the number of injury scenarios. from all the scenarios generated, the scenario providing the highest risk (= the risk of the product) will normally be decisive for the risk reduction measures to be taken, because action on the highest risk reduces the risk most effectively. an exception to the rule might be a specific, less-than-highest risk stemming from a different hazard, which could be managed by specific measures and should, of course, also cover the highest risk. as a rule of thumb, injury scenarios can lead to the highest risk level when: the injury(ies) considered are in the highest severity levels (levels 4 or 3); the overall probability of an injury scenario is quite high (at least > 1/100). table 4 provides further guidance in this respect. this might help to limit the number of scenarios. of course, the number of injury scenarios remains the responsibility of the risk assessor, and it depends on the number of factors that need to be taken into account when determining the risk of the product. it is therefore impossible to give a specific number of injury scenarios that may be necessary in a specific case. to help develop a suitable number of scenarios, these guidelines provide a table with typical injury scenarios (table 2). these should be adapted to the specific product, consumer type and other circumstances. 3.5. severity of injury the injury that a hazard can cause to the consumer can have different degrees of severity. the severity of the injury thus reflects the effect the hazard has on the consumer under the conditions described in the injury scenario. the severity of the injury can depend on: the type of hazard (see list of hazards of section 3.2 in table 2). a mechanical hazard, such as sharp edges, can cause cuts to the fingers; these are immediately noticed, and the consumer will take action to heal his injuries. on the other hand, a chemical hazard may cause cancer. this normally passes unnoticed, and the illness may appear only after many years, and is considered to be very severe since cancer is very difficult to cure, if at all; how powerful the hazard is. for example, a surface heated to 50 c may cause slight burns, whereas a surface at 180 c will cause severe burns; how long the hazard impinges on the consumer. a short contact time with an abrasion hazard may scratch the consumer's skin only superficially, whereas a longer time may take off large parts of the skin; what body part is injured. for example, penetration by a sharp point into the skin of the arm is painful, but penetration into an eye is a more serious and perhaps a life-affecting injury; what impact the hazard has on one or several body parts. an electrical hazard may cause an electric shock with unconsciousness and, subsequently, a fire which may damage the lungs when the unconscious person inhales the smoke; the type and behaviour of the consumer. a product labelled with a warning message can be used, without harm, by an adult consumer, because the consumer adjusts to using the product. on the other hand, a child or other vulnerable consumer (see table 1) who cannot read or understand the warning label may be very seriously injured. to quantify the severity of injury(ies), table 3 in these guidelines shows how to classify injuries into four categories, depending on the reversibility of an injury, i.e. whether recovery from an injury is possible and to what extent. this categorisation is for guidance only, and a risk assessor should change the category if necessary, and report it in the risk assessment. where several injury scenarios are considered in the risk assessment, the severity of each injury should be classified separately, and considered throughout the entire risk assessment process. an example: a consumer uses a hammer to knock a nail into a wall. the hammer head is too weak (due to incorrect material) and it breaks, one of the pieces flying into the eye of the consumer so hard that it causes blindness. the injury is thus an eye injury, foreign body in eye: permanent loss of sight (one eye), which is a level 3 injury in table 3. 3.6. probability of injury the probability of injury is the probability that injury scenario may indeed materialise during the expected lifetime of the product. this probability is not easy to estimate; but when a scenario is described in distinct steps, each step can be given a certain probability, and multiplying these partial probabilities together gives the overall probability of the scenario. this stepwise approach should make it easier to estimate the overall probability. of course, where several scenarios are developed, each scenario requires its own overall probability. where an injury scenario is nevertheless described in a single step, the probability of the scenario can also only be determined in a single overall step. this would only be a guesstimate, however, which could be severely criticised and thus call the entire risk assessment into question. a more transparent assignment of probabilities to a several-step scenario is therefore preferable, especially as the partial probabilities can be built on undisputable evidence. these guidelines distinguish between 8 levels of probability to classify overall probability: from < 1/1 000 000 to > 50 % (see left-hand side of table 4). the following example of a hammer head that breaks when the user knocks a nail into a wall should illustrate how to assign a probability to each step, and how to classify overall probability: step 1: the hammer head breaks when the user tries to knock a nail into a wall because the material of the hammer head is too weak. the weakness was determined in a test, and with the reported weakness the probability of the hammer head breaking during the otherwise expected lifetime of the hammer is put at 1/10. step 2: one of the pieces of the hammer hits the user when it breaks. the probability of this happening is put at 1/10, since the area of upper body exposed to the pieces flying off is considered to be 1/10 of the half-sphere in front of the wall. of course, if the user were standing very close to the wall, his body would take a larger share of the half-sphere, and the probability would be higher. step 3: the piece hits the user on the head. the head is estimated to be about 1/3 of the upper body, and the probability is therefore 1/3. step 4: the piece hits the user in the eye. the eyes are considered to be about 1/20 of the area of the head, and therefore the probability is 1/20. multiplying the probabilities of these steps together gives an overall probability for the scenario of 1/10 1/10 1/3 1/20 = 1/6 000. this translates into > 1/10 000 (see left-hand side of table 4). once the overall probability has been calculated for an injury scenario, it should be checked for plausibility. this requires rather a lot of experience, thus suggesting that the assistance of persons experienced in risk assessment should be sought (see section let others check your risk assessment). as experience is gained with these guidelines estimating probability should become easier, and an increasing number of examples will become available to facilitate this task. assigning probabilities to different injury scenarios for the same product may lead to the following: when the product is used by more vulnerable consumers in a scenario, the probability may have to be raised in general because more vulnerable consumers can be injured more easily. this applies in particular to children, since children do not normally have the experience to take preventive action, on the contrary (see also vulnerable consumers in section 3.3). when the risk is readily recognisable, including through warning labels, the probability may have to be lowered because the user will use the product more carefully in order to avoid injury as far as possible. this may not apply to an injury scenario with a (young) child or other vulnerable user (see table 1) who cannot read. when accidents have been reported that fit into the injury scenario, the probability for that scenario could increase. in cases where accidents have only rarely been reported, or are not known at all, it may be useful to ask the manufacturer of the product whether he is aware of any accident or adverse effect caused by the product. when a fairly large number of conditions are needed for the injury to occur, the overall probability of the scenario would normally be lower. when the conditions needed for the injury to occur are easily met, this may increase the probability. when the test results of the product fail by a large margin to come within the limit values required (by the relevant standard or legislation), the probability of the injury (scenario) occurring may be higher than if the product performed close to the limit values. the probability of injury in this instance is the probability that the injury scenario may actually happen. probability does not therefore describe the general exposure of the population to the product, calculated, for example, by considering the millions of product items sold on the market and then considering that a few of them might fail. considerations of this kind do, however, play a role when determining the appropriate risk reduction measures (see section 4). also, accident statistics, even if product-specific, have to be considered with care when used for to estimate probability. the circumstances of the accident may not be reported in sufficient detail, the product may have changed over time, or the manufacturer may be different, and so on. in addition, light accidents may not have been reported to those collecting the data for the statistics. none the less, accident statistics can shed light on injury scenarios and their probability. 3.7. determination of risk once the severity of the injury and the probability have been determined, if possible for several injury scenarios, the risk level then needs to be looked up in table 4. table 4 combines both the severity of the injury and the probability, and the highest risk is the risk of the product. risks requiring specific risk management measures should also be reported, to ensure that all risks are reduced to a minimum. these guidelines distinguish between 4 levels of risk: serious, high, medium and low. the risk level between neighbouring severities of injury or probability normally changes by 1 level. this is consistent with the general experience that risk does not increase incrementally when input factors change gradually. however, where the severity of injury increases from level 1 to level 2 (on the right-hand side of table 4), some risk levels increase by 2 levels, namely from medium to serious and from low to high. this is due to the fact that these guidelines include 4 graduations of severity of injury, whereas the original method (see introduction) included 5. nevertheless, 4 graduations are considered normal for consumer products, since they make for a sufficiently robust estimation of severity; 5 levels would be too sophisticated since neither the severity of the injury nor the probability can be determined with very high precision. at the end of the risk assessment, be it for an individual injury scenario or for the overall risk of the product, the plausibility of the risk level and uncertainties in the estimates should be considered. this may mean verifying that the risk assessor has used the best information available to make his estimations and assumptions. feedback from colleagues and other experts can also be helpful. a sensitivity analysis can also be very valuable (see example in section 6.3). how does the risk level change when the severity of injury or probability changes by 1 level up or down? if the risk level does not change at all, it is quite plausible that it has been estimated correctly. if it changes, however, the risk level may be borderline. it is then necessary to reconsider the injury scenarios and the assigned severity of injury(ies) and probability(ies). at the end of the sensitivity analysis the risk assessor should be confident that the risk level is sufficiently plausible and that he can document it and pass the information on. 4. from risk to action: how to manage risk responsibly once the risk assessment is complete it will normally be used to decide whether action needs to be taken to reduce the risk and thus prevent harm to a consumer's health. although action is separate from risk assessment, some points are raised here to illustrate the possible follow-up of identified risks. within market surveillance, action will often be taken in contact between the authority and the manufacturer, importer or distributor. this can help the authority to determine the most effective and efficient way of managing the risk. with a serious risk in a consumer product, measures to reduce the risk may include withdrawal from the market or recall. lower levels of risk normally lead to less rigorous measures. it may then be sufficient to add warning labels on the product or to improve the instructions to make the product safe. thus, whatever the level of risk, the authority should consider whether to take action, and if so, what action. nevertheless, there is no automatic link from risk to action. when a product shows several less-than-serious risks, and its overall risk is thus not serious, urgent action may be necessary since any of the risks may materialise quite quickly. the pattern of risks in the product may indicate a lack of quality control in production (54). it is also important to take account of exposure of the population as a whole. where there are a large number of products on the market and the product is therefore used by a large number of consumers, even a single less-than-serious risk may require quick action to avoid adverse effects to the health of consumers. less-than-serious risks may also require action when the product concerned could cause fatal accidents, even though such accidents may be extremely unlikely. this could be the case with a fastening on a beverage container, which could come loose and be swallowed by a child, causing the child to choke to death. a simple change of design to the lid could eliminate the risk, and no further action might be required. even a selling-off period may be granted if the risk of a fatal accident were indeed extremely small. other risk-related aspects may be the public perception of risk and its likely consequences, cultural and political sensitivities and how it is portrayed in the media. these aspects may be especially relevant when the consumers concerned are vulnerable, in particular children. it will be up to the national market surveillance authority(ies) to determine what measures are required. taking action to counteract a risk may also depend on the product itself and the minimum risks compatible with the product's use, considered to be acceptable and consistent with a high level of protection (55). this minimum risk will probably be much lower for toys, where children are involved, than for a chain-saw, which is known to be so high-risk that solid protective equipment is required to keep the risk at a manageable level. finally, even if there is no risk, action may be necessary, for example, when a product is non-compliant with the applicable regulation/legislation (e.g. incomplete markings). in conclusion, there is no automatic link from risk to action. surveillance authorities will take account of a range of factors such as those indicated in section 3.3. the principle of proportionality always has to be considered, and action has to be effective. 5. how to prepare a risk assessment in brief 1. describe the product and its hazard. describe the product unambiguously. does the hazard concern the entire product or only a (separable) part of the product? is there only one hazard within the product? are there several hazards? see table 2 for guidance. identify the standard(s) or legislation applicable to the product. identify the standard(s) or legislation applicable to the product. 2. identify the type of consumer you want to include in your injury scenario with the hazardous product. start with the intended user and the intended use of the product for your first injury scenario. take other consumers (see table 1) and uses for further scenarios. 3. describe an injury scenario in which the product hazard(s) you have selected causes an injury(ies) or adverse health effect(s) to the consumer you selected. describe the steps to the injury(ies) clearly and concisely, without exaggerating the details (shortest path to injury, critical path to injury). if there are several concurrent injuries in your scenario, include them all in that same scenario. when you describe the injury scenario, consider the frequency and duration of use, hazard recognition by the consumer, whether the consumer is vulnerable (in particular children), protective equipment, the consumer's behaviour in the case of an accident, the consumer's cultural background, and other factors that you consider important for the risk assessment. see section 3.3 and table 2 for guidance. 4. determine the severity of the injury. determine the level of severity (1 to 4) of the injury to the consumer. if the consumer suffers from several injuries in your injury scenario, estimate the severity of all those injuries together. see table 3 for guidance. 5. determine the probability of the injury scenario. assign a probability to each step of your injury scenario. multiply the probabilities to calculate the overall probability of your injury scenario. see left-hand side of table 4 for guidance. 6. determine the risk level. combine the severity of the injury and the overall probability of the injury scenario and check the risk level in table 4. 7. check whether the risk level is plausible. if the risk level does not seem plausible, or if you are uncertain about the severity of injury(ies) or about the probability(ies), move them one level up and down and recalculate the risk. this sensitivity analysis will show you whether the risk changes when your input changes. if the risk level remains the same, you can be quite confident of your risk assessment. if it changes easily, you may want to err on the safe side and take the higher risk level as the risk of the consumer product. you could also discuss the plausibility of the risk level with experienced colleagues. 8. develop several injury scenarios to identify the highest risk of the product. if your first injury scenario identifies a risk level below the highest risk level set out in these guidelines, and if you think that the product may pose a higher risk than the one identified, select other consumers (including vulnerable consumers, in particular children); identify other uses (including reasonably foreseeable uses), in order to determine which injury scenario puts the product at its highest risk. the highest risk is normally the risk of the product that allows the most effective risk management measures. in specific cases, a particular hazard may lead to a less-than-highest risk and require specific risk management measures. this has to be taken duly into account. as a rule of thumb, injury scenarios may lead to the highest risk level set out in these guidelines where: the injury(ies) considered are at least at levels 3 or 4; the overall probability of an injury scenario is at least > 1/100. see table 4 for guidance. 9. document and pass on your risk assessment. be transparent and also set out all the uncertainties that you encountered when making your risk assessment. examples for reporting risk assessments are provided in section 6 of these guidelines. schematic flow of risk assessment pass on the risk assessment highest risk identified? yes no 6. look up the risk in table 4 see table 4: probability levels from high (> 50 %) to low (< 1/1 000 000) see table 3: severity of injury laceration, cut bruising concussion entrapment/pinching sprain, strain, musculoskeletal disorder dislocation fracture crushing amputation etc. 5. determine the probability assign a probability to each step. multiply to get the overall probability 4. determine the severity of the injury 3. describe the injury scenario in several steps: shortest path to injury see table 1: consumer types, incl. vulnerable consumers (in particular children) intended/non-intended user intended and reasonably foreseeable use frequency and duration of use hazard recognition/protective behaviour consumer behaviour in the case of an incident consumer's cultural background see table 2: hazards size, shape and surface potential energy kinetic energy electrical energy extreme temperatures radiation fire and explosion etc. 2. identify consumer(s) 1. describe the product unambiguously, and its hazard(s) 6. examples 6.1. folding chair a folding chair has a folding mechanism constructed in such a way that the user's fingers can get trapped between the seat and the folding mechanism. this can lead to fractures or even loss of one or more fingers. determination of risk(s) injury scenario injury type and location severity of injury probability of injury overall probability risk person unfolds the chair, grips seat close to the back corner by mistake (person inattentive/ distracted), finger gets caught between seat and backrest minor pinching of finger 1 unfolding the chair 1 1/500 low risk gripping the seat at back corner while unfolding 1/50 finger gets caught 1/10 > 1/1 000 minor pinching 1 person unfolds the chair, grips seat at the side by mistake (person inattentive/ distracted), finger gets caught between seat and link minor pinching of finger 1 unfolding the chair 1 1/500 low risk gripping the seat at the side while unfolding 1/50 finger gets caught 1/10 > 1/1 000 minor pinching 1 person unfolds the chair, chair is clamped, person tries to push down the seat and grips seat close to the corner by mistake (person inattentive/ distracted), finger gets caught between seat and backrest fracture of finger 2 unfolding the chair 1 1/500 000 low risk chair clamps 1/1 000 gripping the seat at corners while unfolding 1/50 finger gets caught 1/10 > 1/1 000 000 fracture of finger 1 person unfolds the chair, chair is clamped, person tries to push down the seat and grips seat at the side by mistake (person inattentive/ distracted), finger gets caught between seat and link fracture of finger 2 unfolding the chair 1 1/500 000 low risk chair clamps 1/1 000 gripping the seat at the side while unfolding 1/50 finger gets caught 1/10 > 1/1 000 000 fracture of finger 1 person is sitting on chair, wants to move the chair and tries to lift it by gripping the chair at the rear part of the seat, finger gets caught between seat and backrest loss of digit 3 sitting on chair 1 1/6 000 high risk moves the chair while sitting 1/2 grips chair at rear part while moving 1/2 chair partially folds, creating a gap between the backrest and seat 1/3 > 1/10 000 finger is between backrest and seat 1/5 finger gets caught 1/10 loss of (part of) finger 1/10 person is sitting on chair, wants to move the chair and tries to lift it by gripping the chair at the rear part of the seat, finger gets caught between seat and link loss of digit 3 sitting on chair 1 1/6 000 high risk moves the chair while sitting 1/2 grips chair at rear part while moving 1/2 chair partially folds, creating a gap between the backrest and seat 1/3 > 1/10 000 finger is between backrest and seat 1/5 finger gets caught 1/10 loss of (part of) finger 1/10 the overall risk of the folding chair is thus high risk. 6.2. socket protectors this case deals with socket protectors. these are devices that users (parents) put into the electrical socket outlets to stop small children from accessing live parts by putting a long metal object into one of the holes in the outlet and getting a (fatal) electric shock. the holes in this particular protector (where the pins of the plug go through) are so narrow that the pins can get stuck. this means that the user may pull the protector off the outlet when the plug is pulled out. the user may not notice this happening. determination of risk(s) injury scenario injury type and location severity of injury probability of injury overall probability risk protector is removed from the socket, which becomes unprotected. child is playing with thin conductible object, which can be inserted into the socket, accessing high voltage and is electrocuted. electrocution 4 removal of protector 9/10 27/160 000 serious risk not noticing the removal of protector 1/10 child is playing with thin conductible object 1/10 child is unattended when playing 1/2 > 1/10 000 child inserts the object into the socket 3/10 access to voltage 1/2 electrocution due to voltage (without circuit interrupter) 1/4 protector is removed from the socket, which becomes unprotected. child is playing with thin conductible object, which can be inserted into the socket, accessing high voltage and sustains shock. burns 2nd degree 1 removal of protector 9/10 81/160 000 low risk not noticing the removal of protector 1/10 child is playing with thin conductible object 1/10 child inserts the object into the socket 3/10 access to voltage 1/2 > 1/10 000 child is unattended when playing 1/2 burn due to electric current (without circuit interrupter) 3/4 socket unprotected. child is playing with thin conductible object, which can be inserted into the socket, accessing high voltage and is electrocuted. electrocution 4 child is playing with thin conductible object 1/10 3/80 000 high risk child is unattended when playing 1/100 child inserts the object into the socket 3/10 access to voltage 1/2 > 1/100 000 electrocution due to voltage (without circuit interrupter) 1/4 the overall risk of the socket protectors is thus serious. 6.3. sensitivity analysis the factors used to calculate the risk of an injury scenario, namely the severity of the injury and the probability, often have to be estimated. this creates uncertainty. probability in particular can be difficult to estimate, since the behaviour of consumers, for example, can be difficult to predict. does a person perform a certain action often or only occasionally? it is therefore important to consider the level of uncertainty of the two factors and to make a sensitivity analysis. the purpose of this analysis is to establish how much the risk level varies when the estimated factors vary. the example provided on the table below only shows the variation of probability, since the severity of the injury is usually predicted with more certainty. a practical way of performing the sensitivity analysis is to repeat the risk assessment for a certain scenario, but to use a different probability for one or more steps in the scenario. for example, a candle containing seeds could cause a fire, because the seeds can catch fire and generate high flames. furniture or curtains can catch fire and persons not in the room could inhale toxic fumes and suffer fatal poisoning: injury scenario injury type and location severity of injury probability of injury resulting probability risk seeds or beans catch fire generating high flames. furniture or curtains catch fire. persons are not in room, but inhale toxic fumes. fatal poisoning 4 seeds or beans catch fire: 90 % (0,9) people not in the room for some time: 30 % (0,3) furniture or curtains catch fire: 50 % (0,5) (depends on surface on which candle is placed) persons inhale toxic fumes: 5 % (0,05) 0 00675 > 1/1 000 serious the probability levels for the steps in the scenario were estimated as shown in the table. the overall probability is 0,00675, which corresponds to > 1/1 000 in table 4. this leads to the conclusion of serious risk. note that the exact probability is closer to 1/100 than to 1/1 000, which already gives some confidence in the risk level because it is a little deeper in the serious risk area of table 4 than the > 1/1 000 row suggests. suppose we are uncertain about the 5 % probability that persons inhale the toxic fumes. we could put it at a much lower 0,1 % (0 001 = 1 in a thousand). if we recalculate with that assumption, the overall probability is 0,000135, which translates into > 1/10 000. nevertheless, the risk is still serious. even if for some reason the probability were to be a factor of 10 lower, the risk would still be high. therefore, although the probability may vary 10- or 100-fold, we still find a serious or high risk (the latter being quite close to serious). thus, this sensitivity analysis lets us confidently assess the risk as serious. in general, however, risk assessment should be based on reasonable worst cases: not too pessimistic on every factor, but certainly not too optimistic. table 1 consumers consumers description very vulnerable consumers very young children: 0 to 36 months others: persons with extensive and complex disabilities vulnerable consumers young children: children older than 36 months and younger than 8 years. older children: children 8 to 14 years others: persons with reduced physical, sensory or mental capabilities (e.g. partially disabled, elderly, including those over 65, with some reduction in their physical and mental capabilities), or lack of experience and knowledge other consumers consumers other than very vulnerable or vulnerable consumers table 2 hazards, typical injury scenarios and typical injuries hazard group hazard (product property) typical injury scenario typical injury size, shape and surface product is obstacle person trips over product and falls; or person bumps into product bruising; fracture, concussion product is impermeable to air product covers mouth and/or nose of a person (typically a child), or covers internal airway suffocation product is or contains small part person (child) swallows small part; the part gets stuck in larynx and blocks airways choking, internal airway obstruction possible to bite off small part from product person (child) swallows small part; the part gets stuck in the digestive tract digestive tract obstruction sharp corner or point person bumps into sharp corner or is hit by moving sharp object; this causes a puncture or penetration injury puncture; blinding, foreign body in eye; hearing, foreign body in ear sharp edge person touches sharp edge; this lacerates the skin or cuts through tissues laceration, cut; amputation slippery surface person walks on surface, slips and falls bruising; fracture, concussion rough surface person slides along rough surface; this causes friction and/or abrasion abrasion gap or opening between parts person puts a limb or body in opening and finger, arm, neck, head, body or clothing is trapped; injury occurs due to gravity or movement crushing, fracture, amputation, strangulation potential energy low mechanical stability product tips; person on top of product falls from height, or person near product is hit by the product; electrical product tips, breaks and gives access to live parts, or continues to work heating nearby surfaces bruising; dislocation; sprain; fracture, concussion; crushing; electric shock; burns low mechanical strength product collapses by overloading; person on top of product falls from height, or person near product is hit by the product; electrical product tips, breaks and gives access to live parts, or continues to work heating nearby surfaces bruising; dislocation; fracture, concussion; crushing; electric shock; burns high position of user person at high position on the product loses balance, has no support to hold on to and falls from height bruising; dislocation; fracture, concussion; crushing elastic element or spring elastic element or spring under tension is suddenly released; person in the line of movement is hit by the product bruising; dislocation; fracture, concussion; crushing pressurised liquid or gas, or vacuum liquid or gas under pressure is suddenly released; person in the vicinity is hit; or implosion of the product produces flying objects dislocation; fracture, concussion; crushing; cuts (see also under fire and explosion) kinetic energy moving product person in the line of movement of the product is hit by the product or run over bruising; sprain; fracture, concussion; crushing parts moving against one another person puts a body part between the moving parts while they move together; the body part gets trapped and put under pressure (crushed) bruising; dislocation; fracture; crushing parts moving past one another person puts a body part between the moving parts while they move close by (scissor movement); the body part gets trapped between the moving parts and put under pressure (shearing) laceration, cut; amputation rotating parts a body part, hair or clothing of a person is entangled by the rotating part; this causes a pulling force bruising; fracture; laceration (skin of the head); strangulation rotating parts close to one another a body part, hair or clothing of a person is drawn in by the rotating parts; this causes a pulling force and pressure on the body part crushing, fracture, amputation, strangulation acceleration person on the accelerating product loses balance, has no support to hold on to and falls with some speed dislocation; fracture, concussion; crushing flying objects person is hit by the flying object and depending on the energy sustains injuries bruising; dislocation; fracture, concussion; crushing vibration person holding the product loses balance and falls; or prolonged contact with vibrating product causes neurological disorders, osteoarticular disorder, trauma of the spine, vascular disorder bruising; dislocation; fracture; crushing noise person is exposed to noise from the product. tinnitus and hearing loss may occur depending on sound level and distance hearing injury electrical energy high/low voltage person touches part of the product that is at high voltage; the person receives an electric shock and may be electrocuted electric shock heat production product becomes hot; a person touching it may sustain burns; or the product may emit molten particles, steam, etc., that hits a person burn, scald live parts too close electric arc or sparks occur between the live parts. this may cause a fire and intense radiation eye injury; burn, scald extreme temperatures open flames a person near the flames may sustain burns, possibly after clothing catches fire burn, scald hot surfaces person does not recognise the hot surface and touches it; the person sustains burns burn hot liquids person handling a container of liquid spills some of it; the liquid falls on the skin and causes scalds scald hot gases person breathes in the hot gases emitted from a product; this causes lung burn; or prolonged exposure to hot air causes dehydration burn cold surfaces person does not recognise the cold surface and touches it; the person sustains frostbite burn radiation ultraviolet radiation, laser skin or eyes of a person are exposed to radiation emitted by the product burn, scald; neurological disorders; eye injury; skin cancer, mutation high intensity electromagnetic field (emf) source; low frequency or high frequency (microwave) person is close to the electromagnetic field (emf) source, body (central nervous system) is exposed neurological (brain) damage, leukaemia (children) fire and explosion flammable sub stances person is near the flammable substance; an ignition source sets the substance on fire; this causes injuries to the person burn explosive mixtures person is near the explosive mixture; an ignition source causes an explosion; the person is hit by the shock wave, burning material and/or flames burn, scald; eye injury, foreign body in eye; hearing injury, foreign body in ear ignition sources the ignition source causes a fire; a person is injured by flames, or intoxicated by gases from the house fire burn; poisoning overheating product overheats; fire, explosion burn, scald; eye injury, foreign body in eye; hearing injury, foreign body in ear toxicity toxic solid or fluid person ingests substance from product, e.g. by putting it in mouth, and/or substance gets on skin acute poisoning; irritation, dermatitis person breathes in solid or fluid, for example vomited material (pulmonary aspiration) acute poisoning in lungs (aspiration pneumonia); infection toxic gas, vapour or dust person inhales substance from product; and/or substance gets on skin acute poisoning in lungs; irritation, dermatitis sensitising substance person ingests substance from product, e.g. by putting it in mouth; and/or substance gets on skin; and/or person inhales gas, vapour or dust sensitisation; allergic reaction irritating or corrosive solid or fluid person ingests substance from product, e.g. by putting it in mouth, and/or substance gets on skin or in eyes irritation, dermatitis; skin burn; eye injury, foreign body in eye irritating or corrosive gas or vapour person inhales substance from product, and/or substance gets on skin or in eyes irritation, dermatitis; skin burn; acute poisoning or corrosive effect in lungs or in eyes cmr substance person ingests substance from product, e.g. by putting it in mouth, and/or substance gets onto skin; and/or person inhales substance as gas, vapour or dust cancer, mutation, reproductive toxicity microbiological contamination microbiological contamination person gets into contact with contaminated product by ingestion, inhalation or skin contact infection, local or systemic product operating hazards unhealthy posture design causes unhealthy posture of person when operating the product strain; musculoskeletal disorder overexertion design requires use of considerable force when operating the product sprain or strain; musculoskeletal disorder anatomical unsuitability design is not adapted to human anatomy, which makes it difficult or impossible to operate sprain or strain ignoring personal protection design makes it difficult for a person wearing protection to handle or operate the product various injuries inadvertent (de)activation person can easily (de)activate product, which leads to unwanted operation various injuries operational inadequacy design provokes faulty operation by a person; or product with a protective function does not provide expected protection various injuries failure to stop person wants to stop the product, but it continues to operate in situation where this is unwanted various injuries unexpected start product shuts down during a power failure, but resumes operation in a hazardous way various injuries inability to stop in an emergency situation, person is not able to stop operation of the product various injuries inadequately fitting parts person tries to fit a part, needs too much force to fit, product breaks; or part is too loosely fitted and becomes loose during use sprain or strain; laceration, cut; bruising; entrapment missing or incorrectly fitted protection hazardous parts are reachable for a per son various injuries insufficient warning instructions, signs and symbols user does not notice warning instructions signs and/or does not understand symbols various injuries insufficient warning signals user does not see or hear warning signal (optical or audio), causing dangerous operation various injuries nb: this table is for guidance only; the typical injury scenarios should be adapted when preparing a risk assessment. there is specific risk assessment guidance for chemicals, cosmetics and possibly others. it is highly recommended to use this specific guidance when assessing such products. see section 3.2. table 3 severity of injury introduction these risk assessment guidelines distinguish between four levels of injury harm severity. it is important to realise that severity should be assessed completely objectively. the aim is to compare the severity of different scenarios and to set priorities, not to judge the acceptability of a single injury at this stage. any injury harm that could easily have been avoided will be difficult to accept for a consumer. however, authorities can justifiably invest more effort into avoiding irreversible consequences than into preventing temporary discomfort. in order to assess the severity of the consequences (acute injury or other damage to health), objective criteria can be found, on the one hand, in the level of medical intervention, and, on the other hand, in the consequences to the further functioning of the victim. both could be expressed as cost, but the costs of consequences of health damage may be difficult to quantify. combining these criteria, the four levels may be defined as follows: 1. harm or consequence that after basic treatment (first aid, normally not by a doctor) does not substantially hamper functioning or cause excessive pain; usually the consequences are completely reversible. 2. harm or consequence for which a visit to a&e may be necessary, but in general, hospitalisation is not required. functioning may be affected for a limited period, not more than about 6 months, and recovery is more or less complete. 3. harm or consequence that normally requires hospitalisation and will affect functioning for more than 6 months or lead to a permanent loss of function. 4. harm or consequence that is or could be fatal, including brain death; consequences that affect reproduction or offspring; severe loss of limbs and/or function, leading to more than approximately 10 % of disability. the following table, which should be considered as a guide rather than prescriptive or complete, provides examples of injuries at all four levels. national differences may exist, either cultural or caused by different systems of health care and financial arrangements. however, deviating from the proposed classification in the table will affect uniform assessment of risks in the eu; this should be clearly stated and explained in the risk assessment report, and reasons should be given. type of injury severity of injury 1 2 3 4 laceration, cut superficial external (deep) (> 10 cm long on body) (> 5 cm long on face) requiring stitches tendon or into joint white of eye or cornea optic nerve neck artery trachea internal organs bronchial tube oesophagus aorta spinal cord (low) deep laceration of internal organs severed high spinal cord brain (severe lesion/ dysfunction) bruising (abrasion/ contusion, swelling, oedema) superficial 25 cm2 on face 50 cm2 on body major > 25 cm2 on face > 50 cm2 on body trachea internal organs (minor) heart brain lung, with blood or air in chest brain stem spinal cord causing paralysis concussion very short unconsciousness (minutes) prolonged unconsciousness coma entrapment/ pinching minor pinching (use as appropriate the final outcomes of bruising, crushing, fracture, dislocation, amputation, as applicable.) (same outcome as for suffocation/ strangulation.) sprain, strain, musculoskeletal disorder extremities joints spine (no dislocation or fracture) knee ligaments strain ligament or tendon rupture/tear muscle tear whiplash dislocation extremities (finger, toe, hand, foot) elbow jaw loosening of tooth ankle wrist shoulder hip knee spine spinal column fracture extremities (finger, toe, hand, foot) wrist arm rib sternum nose tooth jaw bones around eye ankle leg (femur and lower leg) hip thigh skull spine (minor compression fracture) jaw (severe) larynx multiple rib fractures blood or air in chest neck spinal column crushing extremities (fingers, toe, hand, foot) elbow ankle wrist forearm leg shoulder trachea larynx pelvis spinal cord mid-low neck chest (massive crushing) brain stem amputation finger(s) toe(s) hand foot (part of) arm leg eye both extremities piercing, puncturing limited depth, only skin involved deeper than skin abdominal wall (no organ involvement) eye internal organs chest wall aorta heart bronchial tube deep injuries in organs (liver, kidney, bowel, etc.) ingestion internal organ injury (refer also to internal airway obstruction where the ingested object gets stuck high in the oesophagus.) permanent damage to internal organ internal air way obstruction oxygen flow to brain blocked without permanent consequences oxygen flow to brain blocked with permanent consequences suffocation/ strangulation oxygen flow to brain blocked without permanent consequences fatal suffocation/ strangulation submersion/ drowning fatal drowning burn/scald (by heat, cold, or chemical substance) 1 , up to 100 % of body surface 2 , < 6 % of body surface 2 , 6-15 % of body surface 2 , 16-35 % of body surface, or 3 , up to 35 % of body surface inhalation burn 2 or 3 , > 35 % of body surface inhalation burn requiring respiratory assistance electric shock (see also under burns as electric current can cause burns.) local effects (temporary cramp or muscle paralysis) electrocution neurological disorders triggered epileptic seizure eye injury, foreign body in eye temporary pain in eye without need for treatment temporary loss of sight partial loss of sight permanent loss of sight (one eye) permanent loss of sight (both eyes) hearing injury, foreign body in ear temporary pain in ear without need for treatment temporary impairment of hearing partial loss of hearing complete loss of hearing (one ear) complete loss of hearing (both ears) poisoning from substances (ingestion, inhalation, dermal) diarrhoea, vomiting, local symptoms reversible damage to internal organs, e.g. liver, kidney, slight haemolytic anaemia irreversible damage to internal organs, e.g. oesophagus, stomach, liver, kidney, haemolytic anaemia, reversible damage to nerve system irreversible damage to nerve system fatality irritation, dermatitis, inflammation or corrosive effect of substances (inhalation, dermal) local slight irritation reversible eye damage reversible systemic effects inflammatory effects lungs, respiratory insufficiency, chemical pneumonia irreversible systemic effects partial loss of sight corrosive effects lungs, requiring respiratory assistance asphyxia allergic reaction or sensitisation mild or local allergic reaction allergic reaction, widespread allergic contact dermatitis strong sensitisation, provoking allergies to multiple substances anaphylactic reaction, shock fatality long-term damage from contact with substances or from exposure to radiation diarrhoea, vomiting, local symptoms reversible damage to internal organs, e.g. liver, kidney, slight haemolytic anaemia damage to nervous system, e.g. organic psycho syndrome (ops; also called chronic toxic encephalopathy, also known as painters' disease). irreversible damage to internal organs, e.g. oesophagus, stomach, liver, kidney, haemolytic anaemia, reversible damage to nervous system cancer (leukaemia) effects on reproduction effects on offspring cns depression microbiological infection reversible damage irreversible effects infection requiring prolonged hospitalisation, antibiotics-resistant organisms fatality table 4 risk level from the combination of the severity of injury and probability probability of damage during foreseeable lifetime of the product severity of injury 1 2 3 4 high low >50 % h s s s > 1/10 m s s s > 1/100 m s s s > 1/1 000 l h s s > 1/10 000 l m h s > 1/100 000 l l m h > 1/1 000 000 l l l m < 1/1 000 000 l l l l s serious risk h high risk m medium risk l low risk glossary of terms hazard: source of danger involving the chance of being injured or harmed. a means of quantifying the hazard in a risk assessment is the severity of the possible injury or harm. product hazard: hazard created by the properties of a product. risk: balanced combination of a hazard and the probability that damage will occur. risk describes neither the hazard, nor the probability, but both at the same time. risk assessment: procedure for identifying and assessing hazards, consisting of three steps: 1. identification of the seriousness of a hazard; 2. determination of the probability that a consumer will be injured by that hazard; 3. combination of the hazard with the probability. risk level: degree of risk, which may be serious, high, medium and low. when the (highest) level of risk has been identified, the risk assessment is complete. risk management: follow-up action, which is separate from risk assessment and aims to reduce or eliminate a risk. (1) in other places of these guidelines, the term commission generally refers to the rapex team established in the commission department responsible for directive 2001/95/ec and to the relevant commission services, where appropriate. (2) the information and communication system on market surveillance (icsms). this platform is aimed at facilitating communication between market surveillance bodies in the eu and in efta countries on non-compliant products. (3) in the context of this document, the term member states must be interpreted as not precluding all other actors from being addressed by the provisions contained in these guidelines. (4) see the latest ec implementing decision published on https://ec.europa.eu/consumers/consumers_safety/safety_products/rapex/alerts/repository/content/pages/rapex/index_en.htm (5) see recital 10 of directive 2001/95/ec. (6) regulation (ec) no 178/2002 of the european parliament and of the council of 28 january 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the european food safety authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety (oj l 31, 1.2.2002, p. 1). (7) directive 2001/83/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 6 november 2001 on the community code relating to medicinal products for human use (oj l 311, 28.11.2001, p. 67). (8) directive 2001/82/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 6 november 2001 on the community code relating to veterinary medicinal products (oj l 311, 28.11.2001, p. 1). (9) regulation (eu) 2017/745 of the european parliament and of the council of 5 april 2017 on medical devices, amending directive 2001/83/ec, regulation (ec) no 178/2002 and regulation (ec) no 1223/2009 and repealing council directives 90/385/eec and 93/42/eec (oj l 117, 5.5.2017, p. 1). (10) council directive 90/385/eec of 20 june 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the member states relating to active implantable medical devices (oj l 189, 20.7.1990, p. 17). (11) directive (eu) 2015/1535 of the european parliament and of the council of 9 september 2015 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on information society services (oj l 241, 17.9.2015, p. 1). (12) see eu general risk assessment methodology (action 5 of multi-annual action plan for the surveillance of products in the eu (com(2013)76) providing guidance to authorities with relation to article 20(2) of regulation (ec) no 765/2008: http://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/17107/attachments/1/translations (13) see https://ec.europa.eu/consumers/consumer-safety/rag/#/screen/home (14) www.ec.europa.eu/rapex (15) see part i, chapter 6.2 of these guidelines. (16) see part ii, chapter 2.2.1 of these guidelines. (17) see part ii, chapter 2.2.1 of these guidelines. (18) see part ii, chapter 2.2.2 of these guidelines. (19) see part ii, chapter 2.2.2 of these guidelines. (20) for more information on follow-up actions, see part ii chapter 4.4.5 of these guidelines. (21) for more information about notifications where safety aspects are subject to discussions at eu level, see part ii chapters 3.4.4 and 3.4.7.1.1 of these guidelines. (22) see point 10 of annex ii of directive 2001/95/ec. (23) see point 9 of annex ii of directive 2001/95/ec. (24) for more information on notifications on safety aspects subject to discussions at eu level, see part ii chapters 3.1.2(d) and 3.4.7.1.1. (25) https://ec.europa.eu/consumers/consumers_safety/safety_products/rapex/alerts/?event=main.search (26) practice already agreed at the gpsd committee of 24 september 2012, of which rapex contact points were informed at the rapex contact point meeting of 4 october (agenda point 4) and applied since 2013. (27) paragraph 1 of article 16(1) of directive 2001/95/ec and article 23 paragraph 3 in relation to article 19(5) of regulation (ec) no 765/2008. (28) article 16(1) and (2) of directive 2001/95/ec. (29) for more information on the notification criteria, see part i chapter 2. (30) for more information on notifications sent through the rapex application before measures are taken, see chapter 3.1.2(b). (31) for more information on notifications on safety aspects subject to discussions at eu level, see part ii chapters 3.1.2.d and 3.4.4. (32) for more information about deadlines, see part iii appendix 4 of these guidelines. (33) all deadlines mentioned in these guidelines are expressed in calendar days. (34) see point 10 of annex ii of directive 2001/95/ec. (35) for the purpose of these guidelines, economic operator refers to any natural of legal person defined as economic operator in regulation (ec) no 765/2008 or as producer and distributor in the gpsd. (36) https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/etranslation/translatedocument.html (37) there is no need to send notifications via the permanent representation of a member state to the eu. (38) see part i, chapter 5.3 of these guidelines. (39) the fields contained in the template may be updated following developments agreed between the commission and member states. (40) the fields contained in the template may be updated following developments agreed between the commission and member states. (41) if you need more information on the risk assessment method for harmonised products (both consumer and professional products) in relation to broader categories of public risks protected under eu harmonisation legislation, please refer to part i, chapter 5.3. (42) benis hg (1990): a product risk assessment nomograph, report prepared for the new zealand ministry of consumer affairs, dated february 1990. cited in: european commission (2005) establishing a comparative inventory of approaches and methods used by enforcement authorities for the assessment of the safety of consumer products covered by directive 2001/95/ec on general product safety and identification of best practices. report prepared by risk & policy analysts (rpa), loddon, norfolk, uk. (43) method used by the belgian authorities. cited in: european commission (2005) establishing a comparative inventory of approaches and methods used by enforcement authorities for the assessment of the safety of consumer products covered by directive 2001/95/ec on general product safety and identification of best practices. report prepared by risk & policy analysts (rpa), loddon, norfolk, uk. (44) commission decision 2004/418/ec of 29 april 2004 laying down guidelines for the management of the eu rapid information system (rapex) and for notifications presented in accordance with article 11 of directive 2001/95/ec (oj l 151, 30.4.2004, p. 83). (45) directive 2001/95/ec. (46) https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/idbpa/. (47) nb: uncertainty always has to be taken into account when comparing a test result with a limit. see, for example: the report on the relationship between analytical results, measurement uncertainty, recovery factors and the provisions of eu food and feed legislation https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/chemical_safety/contaminants/catalogue_en the summary report on the preparation of a working document in support of the uniform interpretation of legislative standards and the laboratory quality standards prescribed under directive 93/99/eec. http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/scoop/9.1_sr_en.pdf (48) regulation (ec) no 1907/2006 of the european parliament and of the council of 18 december 2006 concerning the registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals (reach), establishing a european chemicals agency, amending directive 1999/45/ec and repealing council regulation (eec) no 793/93 and commission regulation (ec) no 1488/94 as well as council directive 76/769/eec and commission directives 91/155/eec, 93/67/eec, 93/105/ec and 2000/21/ec (oj l 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1). (49) oj l 164, 26.6.2009, p. 7. (50) standard en 71-1:2005, section 8.2 +a6:2008. (51) article 10 of regulation (ec) no 1223/2009 (oj l 342, 22.12.2009, p. 59). (52) reach regulation and guidance documents on reach, see http://echa.europa.eu/ european chemicals agency (2008). the guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment: http://guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_en.htm (53) commission implementing decision 2013/674/eu of 25 november 2013 on guidelines on annex i to regulation (ec) no 1223/2009 of the european parliament and of the council on cosmetic products (oj l 315, 26.11.2013, p. 82); sccs (scientific committee on consumer safety), sccs notes of guidance for the testing of cosmetic ingredients and their safety evaluation 9th revision, 29 september 2015, sccs/1564/15, revision of 25 april 2016: http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_190.pdf (54) see part i chapter 1.1, penultimate paragraph. (55) this is taken from the definition of safe product in article 2(b) of directive 2001/95/ec.

name: council decision (eu) 2019/385 of 4 march 2019 on the conclusion of the protocol on the implementation of the fisheries partnership agreement between the european union and the republic of c 'te d'ivoire (2018-2024) type: decision subject matter: fisheries; africa; international affairs; european construction date published: 2019-03-12 12.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 70/1 council decision (eu) 2019/385 of 4 march 2019 on the conclusion of the protocol on the implementation of the fisheries partnership agreement between the european union and the republic of c 'te d'ivoire (2018-2024) the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 43, in conjunction with article 218(6)(a)(v) and article 218(7) thereof, having regard to the proposal from the european commission, having regard to the consent of the european parliament (1), whereas: (1) on 17 march 2008, the council adopted regulation (ec) no 242/2008 (2) concluding the fisheries partnership agreement between the republic of c 'te d'ivoire and the european community (3) (the agreement). the agreement was then tacitly renewed and is still in force. (2) the last protocol to the agreement expired on 30 june 2018. (3) the commission has negotiated, on behalf of the union, a new protocol implementing the agreement (the protocol). the protocol was initialled on 16 march 2018. (4) in accordance with council decision (eu) 2018/1069 (4), the protocol was signed on 1 august 2018, subject to its conclusion at a later date. (5) the protocol has been applied on a provisional basis as from the date of its signature. (6) the objective of the protocol is to enable the union and the republic of c 'te d'ivoire (c 'te d'ivoire) to work more closely on promoting a sustainable fisheries policy, sound exploitation of fisheries resources in ivorian waters, and c 'te d'ivoire's efforts to develop a blue economy. (7) the protocol should be approved. (8) article 9 of the agreement establishes the joint committee responsible for monitoring its implementation (the joint committee). furthermore, in accordance with article 5(4) and articles 6 and 7 of the protocol, the joint committee may approve certain amendments to the protocol. in order to facilitate the approval of such amendments, the commission should be empowered, subject to specific conditions, to approve those amendments under a simplified procedure, has adopted this decision: article 1 the protocol on the implementation of the fisheries partnership agreement between the european union and the republic of c 'te d'ivoire (2018-2024) is hereby approved on behalf of the union (5). article 2 the president of the council shall, on behalf of the union, give the notification provided for in article 14 of the protocol. article 3 subject to the provisions and conditions set out in the annex to this decision, the commission shall be empowered to approve, on behalf of the union, the amendments to the protocol to be adopted by the joint committee. article 4 this decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at brussels, 4 march 2019. for the council the president a. anton (1) consent of 12 february 2019 (not yet published in the official journal). (2) council regulation (ec) no 242/2008 of 17 march 2008 on the conclusion of the fisheries partnership agreement between the european community and the republic of c 'te d'ivoire (oj l 75, 18.3.2008, p. 51). (3) oj l 48, 22.2.2008, p. 41. (4) council decision (eu) 2018/1069 of 26 july 2018 on the signing, on behalf of the union, and provisional application of the protocol on the implementation of the fisheries partnership agreement between the european union and the republic of c 'te d'ivoire (2018-2024) (oj l 194, 31.7.2018, p. 1). (5) the protocol has been published in oj l 194 of 31.7.2018, p. 3, together with the decision on signature. annex scope of the empowerment and procedure for establishing the union position in the joint committee (1) the commission shall be authorised to negotiate with the republic of c 'te d'ivoire and, where appropriate and subject to compliance with point 3, agree on modifications to the protocol in respect of the following issues: (a) review of fishing opportunities and related provisions in accordance with articles 6 and 7 of the protocol; (b) adaption of the arrangements for implementing sectoral support in accordance with article 6 of the protocol; (c) management measures falling within the powers of the joint committee in accordance with article 5(4) of the protocol. (2) in the joint committee established under the agreement, the union shall: (a) act in accordance with the objectives pursued by the union within the framework of the common fisheries policy; (b) promote positions that are consistent with the relevant rules adopted by regional fisheries management organisations and in the context of joint management by coastal states. (3) when a decision on modifications to the protocol referred to in point 1 is to be adopted during a joint committee meeting, the necessary steps shall be taken to ensure that the position to be expressed on behalf of the union takes account of the latest statistical, biological and other relevant information transmitted to the commission. to this effect and based on that information, a document setting out the particulars of the proposed union position shall be transmitted by the commission services, in sufficient time before the relevant joint committee meeting, to the council or to its preparatory bodies for consideration and approval. (4) in respect of the issues referred to in point 1(a), the approval of the envisaged union position by the council shall require a qualified majority of votes. in the other cases, the union position envisaged in the preparatory document shall be deemed to be agreed, unless a number of member states equivalent to a blocking minority objects during a meeting of the council's preparatory body or within 20 days from receipt of the preparatory document, whichever occurs earlier. in case of such objection, the matter shall be referred to the council. (5) if, in the course of further meetings, including on the spot, it is impossible to reach an agreement in order for the union position to take account of new elements, the matter shall be referred to the council or its preparatory bodies. (6) the commission is invited to take, in due time, any steps necessary as a follow up to the decision of the joint committee, including, where appropriate, publication of the relevant decision in the official journal of the european union and submission of any proposal necessary for the implementation of that decision.

name: decision (eu, euratom) 2019/382 of the representatives of the governments of the member states of 6 march 2019 appointing a judge to the general court type: decision subject matter: eu institutions and european civil service date published: 2019-03-11 11.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 69/50 decision (eu, euratom) 2019/382 of the representatives of the governments of the member states of 6 march 2019 appointing a judge to the general court the representatives of the governments of the member states of the european union, having regard to the treaty on european union, and in particular article 19 thereof, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular articles 254 and 255 thereof, having regard to the treaty establishing the european atomic energy community, and in particular article 106a(1) thereof, whereas: (1) in accordance with article 7 of protocol no 3 on the statute of the court of justice of the european union and following the appointment of mr peter george xuereb as judge of the court of justice, a judge should be appointed to the general court for the remainder of the term of office of mr peter george xuereb, which runs until 31 august 2019. (2) ms ramona frendo has been nominated for this post. (3) the panel set up under article 255 of the treaty on the functioning of the european union has given an opinion on the suitability of ms ramona frendo to perform the duties of judge of the general court, have adopted this decision: article 1 ms ramona frendo is hereby appointed judge to the general court for the period from the date of entry into force of this decision to 31 august 2019. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at brussels, 6 march 2019. the president l. odobescu

name: council decision (eu) 2019/380 of 4 march 2019 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the european union, within the eea joint committee concerning the amendment of annex ix (financial services) and annex xix (consumer protection) to the eea agreement (text with eea relevance.) type: decision subject matter: international affairs; civil law; financial institutions and credit; construction and town planning; consumption; european construction date published: 2019-03-11 11.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 69/43 council decision (eu) 2019/380 of 4 march 2019 on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the european union, within the eea joint committee concerning the amendment of annex ix (financial services) and annex xix (consumer protection) to the eea agreement (text with eea relevance) the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 114 in conjunction with article 218(9) thereof, having regard to council regulation (ec) no 2894/94 of 28 november 1994 concerning arrangements for implementing the agreement on the european economic area (1), and in particular article 1(3) thereof, having regard to the proposal from the european commission, whereas: (1) the agreement on the european economic area (2) (the eea agreement) entered into force on 1 january 1994. (2) pursuant to article 98 of the eea agreement, the eea joint committee may decide to amend, inter alia, annex ix (financial services) and annex xix (consumer protection) to that agreement. (3) directive 2014/17/eu of the european parliament and of the council (3) is to be incorporated into the eea agreement. (4) annexes ix and xix to the eea agreement should therefore be amended accordingly. (5) the position of the union within the eea joint committee should therefore be based on the attached draft decision, has adopted this decision: article 1 the position to be adopted, on behalf of the union, within the eea joint committee on the proposed amendment of annex ix (financial services) and annex xix (consumer protection) to the eea agreement, shall be based on the draft decision of the eea joint committee attached to this decision. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at brussels, 4 march 2019. for the council the president a. anton (1) oj l 305, 30.11.1994, p. 6. (2) oj l 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3. (3) directive 2014/17/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 4 february 2014 on credit agreements for consumers relating to residential immovable property and amending directives 2008/48/ec and 2013/36/eu and regulation (eu) no 1093/2010 (oj l 60, 28.2.2014, p. 34). draft decision of the eea joint committee no /2019 of amending annex ix (financial services) and annex xix (consumer protection) to the eea agreement the eea joint committee, having regard to the agreement on the european economic area (the eea agreement), and in particular article 98 thereof, whereas: (1) directive 2014/17/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 4 february 2014 on credit agreements for consumers relating to residential immovable property and amending directives 2008/48/ec and 2013/36/eu and regulation (eu) no 1093/2010 (1), as corrected by oj l 246, 23.9.2015, p. 11, is to be incorporated into the eea agreement. (2) annexes ix and xix to the eea agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, has adopted this decision: article 1 annex ix to the eea agreement shall be amended as follows: 1. the following indent is added in point 31g (regulation (eu) no 1093/2010 of the european parliament and of the council): 32014 l 0017: directive 2014/17/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 4 february 2014 (oj l 60, 28.2.2014, p. 34), as corrected by oj l 246, 23.9.2015, p. 11. 2. the following point is inserted after point 31i (regulation (eu) no 1095/2010 of the european parliament and of the council): 31j. 32014 l 0017: directive 2014/17/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 4 february 2014 on credit agreements for consumers relating to residential immovable property and amending directives 2008/48/ec and 2013/36/eu and regulation (eu) no 1093/2010 (oj l 60, 28.2.2014, p. 34), as corrected by oj l 246, 23.9.2015, p. 11. the provisions of the directive shall, for the purposes of this agreement, be read with the following adaptations: (a) notwithstanding the provisions of protocol 1 to this agreement, and unless otherwise provided for in this agreement, the terms member state(s) and competent authorities shall be understood to include, in addition to their meaning in the directive, the efta states and their competent authorities, respectively. (b) in point (b) of article 5(3), the words or, as the case may be, the efta surveillance authority shall be inserted after the words the european supervisory authority (european banking authority) (eba). (c) in articles 12(3) and 27(3), as regards the efta states, the words 20 march 2014 shall read the date of entry into force of decision of the eea joint committee no / of [this decision]. (d) in article 14(5), as regards the efta states, the words 20 march 2014 shall read the date of entry into force of decision of the eea joint committee no / of [this decision] and the words until 21 march 2019 shall read for five years thereafter. (e) in article 26(2), the following subparagraph is added: liechtenstein is exempted from the statistical monitoring required by paragraph 2 of article 26. (f) in the fifth subparagraph of paragraph 2, and in point (b) of paragraph 4 of article 34, the words eba may act shall be replaced by the words eba or, as the case may be, the efta surveillance authority may act. (g) in article 37, the words eba may act in accordance with the powers conferred on it by that article and any binding decision made by eba shall be replaced by the words eba or, as the case may be, the efta surveillance authority may act in accordance with the powers conferred on it by that article and any binding decision made by eba or, as the case may be, the efta surveillance authority. (h) in article 43, as regards the efta states, the words 21 march 2016 and 20 march 2014 shall read the date of entry into force of decision of the eea joint committee no / of [this decision] and the words 21 march 2017 shall read one year after the date of entry into force of decision of the eea joint committee no / of [this decision]. article 2 the following indent is added in point 7h (directive 2008/48/ec of the european parliament and of the council) of annex xix to the eea agreement: 32014 l 0017: directive 2014/17/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 4 february 2014 (oj l 60, 28.2.2014, p. 34), as corrected by oj l 246, 23.9.2015, p. 11. article 3 the text of directive 2014/17/eu, as corrected by oj l 246, 23.9.2015, p. 11, in the icelandic and norwegian languages, to be published in the eea supplement to the official journal of the european union, shall be authentic. article 4 this decision shall enter into force on [ ], provided that all the notifications under article 103(1) of the eea agreement have been made (*1). article 5 this decision shall be published in the eea section of, and in the eea supplement to, the official journal of the european union. done at brussels, for the eea joint committee the president the secretaries to the eea joint committee (1) oj l 60, 28.2.2014, p. 34. (*1) [no constitutional requirements indicated.] [constitutional requirements indicated.]

name: council decision (eu) 2019/375 of 5 march 2019 appointing a member, proposed by the italian republic, of the committee of the regions type: decision subject matter: eu institutions and european civil service; europe date published: 2019-03-08 8.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 68/11 council decision (eu) 2019/375 of 5 march 2019 appointing a member, proposed by the italian republic, of the committee of the regions the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 305 thereof, having regard to the proposal of the italian government, whereas: (1) on 26 january 2015, 5 february 2015 and 23 june 2015, the council adopted decisions (eu) 2015/116 (1), (eu) 2015/190 (2) and (eu) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the committee of the regions for the period from 26 january 2015 to 25 january 2020. on 11 july 2017, by council decision (eu) 2017/1334 (4), mr augusto rollandin was replaced by mr pierluigi marquis as a member. on 29 january 2018, by council decision (eu) 2018/157 (5), mr pierluigi marquis was replaced by mr laurent vierin as a member. on 8 october 2018, by council decision (eu) 2018/1510 (6), mr laurent vierin was replaced by ms nicoletta spelgatti as a member. (2) a member's seat on the committee of the regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of ms nicoletta spelgatti, has adopted this decision: article 1 the following is hereby appointed as a member of the committee of the regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 january 2020: mr pierluigi marquis, consigliere della regione autonoma valle d'aosta. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at brussels, 5 march 2019. for the council the president g.l. gavrilescu (1) council decision (eu) 2015/116 of 26 january 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the committee of the regions for the period from 26 january 2015 to 25 january 2020 (oj l 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42). (2) council decision (eu) 2015/190 of 5 february 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the committee of the regions for the period from 26 january 2015 to 25 january 2020 (oj l 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25). (3) council decision (eu) 2015/994 of 23 june 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the committee of the regions for the period from 26 january 2015 to 25 january 2020 (oj l 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70). (4) council decision (eu) 2017/1334 of 11 july 2017 appointing a member, proposed by the italian republic, of the committee of the regions (oj l 185, 18.7.2017, p. 45). (5) council decision (eu) 2018/157 of 29 january 2018 appointing a member, proposed by the italian republic, of the committee of the regions (oj l 29, 1.2.2018, p. 35). (6) council decision (eu) 2018/1510 of 8 october 2018 appointing two members, proposed by the italian republic, of the committee of the regions (oj l 255, 11.10.2018, p. 15).

name: council decision (cfsp) 2019/354 of 4 march 2019 amending decision 2014/119/cfsp concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in ukraine type: decision subject matter: international affairs; european construction; civil law; europe date published: 2019-03-05 5.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 64/7 council decision (cfsp) 2019/354 of 4 march 2019 amending decision 2014/119/cfsp concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in ukraine the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on european union, and in particular article 29 thereof, having regard to the proposal from the high representative of the union for foreign affairs and security policy, whereas: (1) on 5 march 2014 the council adopted decision 2014/119/cfsp (1). (2) on the basis of a review of decision 2014/119/cfsp, the application of restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies should be extended until 6 march 2020, the entry for one person should be deleted and the annex should be supplemented with information regarding the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection. (3) decision 2014/119/cfsp should therefore be amended accordingly, has adopted this decision: article 1 decision 2014/119/cfsp is amended as follows: (1) in article 5, the second paragraph is replaced by the following: this decision shall apply until 6 march 2020.; (2) the annex is amended as set out in the annex to this decision. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at brussels, 4 march 2019. for the council the president a. anton (1) council decision 2014/119/cfsp of 5 march 2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in ukraine (oj l 66, 6.3.2014, p. 26). annex the annex to decision 2014/119/cfsp is amended as follows: (1) the section list of persons, entities and bodies referred to in article 1 is amended as follows: (a) the heading is replaced by the following: a. list of persons, entities and bodies referred to in article 1; (b) the entry for the following person is deleted from the list: 5. andrii petrovych kliuiev. (2) the following section is added: b. rights of defence and right to effective judicial protection the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection under the code of criminal procedure of ukraine article 42 of the code of criminal procedure of ukraine ( code of criminal procedure ) provides that every person who is suspected or accused in criminal proceedings enjoys rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection. these include: the right to be informed of the criminal offence of which he has been suspected or accused; the right to be informed, expressly and promptly, of his rights under the code of criminal procedure; the right to have, when first requested, access to a defence lawyer; the right to present petitions for procedural actions; and the right to challenge decisions, actions and omissions by the investigator, the public prosecutor and the investigating judge. article 306 of the code of criminal procedure provides that complaints against decisions, acts or omissions of the investigator or public prosecutor must be considered by an investigating judge of a local court in the presence of the complainant or his defence lawyer or legal representative. in addition, article 309 of the code of criminal procedure specifies the decisions of investigating judges that may be challenged on appeal, and that other decisions may be subject to judicial review in the course of preparatory proceedings in court. moreover, a number of procedural investigating actions are only possible subject to a ruling by the investigating judge or a court (e.g. seizure of property under article 164, and measures of detention under article 176 of the code of criminal procedure). application of the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of each of the listed persons 1. viktor fedorovych yanukovych the information on the council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of mr yanukovych were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the council relied. this is demonstrated in particular by a number of court decisions relating to the seizure of property and by a court decision of 1 november 2018 granting permission for the arrest and summoning and bringing of the suspected to the court, as well as by a decision of the investigating judge of 8 october 2018 refusing the prosecutor's application for a special pre-trial investigation in absentia. 2. vitalli yuriyovych zakharchenko the information on the council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of mr zakharchenko were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the council relied. this is demonstrated in particular by the decisions of the investigating judge of 21 may 2018 and of 23 november 2018 granting permission to detain mr zakharchenko with the purpose of bringing him to the court to participate in hearing the petition for the application of detention in custody. 3. viktor pavlovych pshonka the information on the council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of mr pshonka were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the council relied. this is demonstrated in particular by the decisions of the investigating judge of 12 march 2018 and of 13 august 2018 granting permission to detain mr pshonka with the purpose of bringing him to the court to participate in hearing the petition for the application of detention in custody. 6. viktor ivanovych ratushniak the information on the council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of mr ratushniak were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the council relied. this is demonstrated in particular by the decisions of the investigating judge of 21 may 2018 and of 23 november 2018 granting permission to detain mr ratushniak with the purpose of bringing him to the court to participate in hearing the petition for the application of detention in custody. 7. oleksandr viktorovych yanukovych the information on the council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of mr yanukovych were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the council relied. this is demonstrated in particular by the decision of the investigating judge of 7 february 2018 refusing the prosecutor's application for a special pre-trial investigation in absentia, by a number court decisions relating to the seizures of property and by the decision of the investigating judge of 27 june 2018 cancelling the resolution of the prosecution refusing to grant the motion of defence for closing the investigation. 9. artem viktorovych pshonka the information on the council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of mr pshonka were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the council relied. this is demonstrated in particular by the decisions of the investigating judge of 12 march 2018 and of 13 august 2018 granting permission to detain mr pshonka with the purpose of bringing him to the court to participate in hearing the petition for the application of detention in custody. 11. mykola yanovych azarov the information on the council's file shows that the rights of defence of and the right to effective judicial protection mr azarov were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the council relied. this is demonstrated in particular by the decision of the investigating judge of 8 september 2018 granting permission for a special investigation in absentia as well as by the decision of the investigating judge of 16 august 2018 granting permission to detain mr azarov with the purpose of bringing him to the court to participate in hearing the petition for the application of detention in custody, as well as by a number of court decisions relating to the seizures of property. 12. serhiy vitalyovych kurchenko the information on the council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of mr kurchenko were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the council relied. this is demonstrated in particular by the decision of the investigating judge of 7 march 2018 granting permission for a special investigation in absentia. 13. dmytro volodymyrovych tabachnyk the information on the council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of mr tabachnyk were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the council relied. this is demonstrated in particular by the decisions of the investigating judge of 8 may 2018 granting permission to detain mr tabachnyk with the purpose of bringing him to the court to participate in hearing the petition for the application of detention in custody. 15. serhiy hennadiyovych arbuzov the information on the council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of mr arbuzov were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the council relied. this is demonstrated in particular by a number of court decisions relating to the seizures of property as well as annulment of the property seizures. 17. oleksandr viktorovych klymenko the information on the council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of mr klymenko were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the council relied. this is demonstrated in particular by the decision of the investigating judge of 5 october 2018 granting permission for a special investigation in absentia. 18. edward stavytskyi the information on the council's file shows that the rights of defence and the right to effective judicial protection of mr stavytskyi were respected in the criminal proceedings on which the council relied. this is demonstrated by a number of court decisions relating to the seizure of property, the decision of the investigating judge of 22 november 2017 granting permission for a special investigation in absentia, by the prosecutor's instructions of 2 january 2018 to the investigator to notify the suspects and their defence lawyers of the completion of the pre-trial investigation and by the fact that on 8 may 2018 the indictment was referred to the sviatoshynskyi district court of kiev for consideration on the merits. the information also shows that there was no previous valid decision of the prosecution not to launch a criminal investigation, and that the relevant criminal proceedings therefore did not infringe the principle of ne bis in idem.

name: political and security committee decision (cfsp) 2019/345 of 22 february 2019 extending the mandate of the head of mission of the european union csdp mission in mali (eucap sahel mali) (eucap sahel mali/1/2019) type: decision subject matter: european construction; africa; international security date published: 2019-03-01 1.3.2019 en official journal of the european union l 62/10 political and security committee decision (cfsp) 2019/345 of 22 february 2019 extending the mandate of the head of mission of the european union csdp mission in mali (eucap sahel mali) (eucap sahel mali/1/2019) the political and security committee, having regard to the treaty on european union, and in particular the third paragraph of article 38 thereof, having regard to council decision 2014/219/cfsp of 15 april 2014 on the european union csdp mission in mali (eucap sahel mali) (1), and in particular article 7(1) thereof, whereas: (1) pursuant to decision 2014/219/cfsp, the political and security committee (psc) is authorised, in accordance with article 38 of the treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of exercising political control and strategic direction of the eucap sahel mali mission, including the decision to appoint a head of mission. (2) on 18 september 2017, the psc adopted decision (cfsp) 2017/1780 (2), appointing mr philippe rio as head of mission of eucap sahel mali from 1 october 2017 to 14 january 2018. (3) on 9 january 2018, the psc adopted decision (cfsp) 2018/57 (3), extending the mandate of mr philippe rio as head of mission of eucap sahel mali from 15 january 2018 to 14 january 2019. (4) on 17 december 2018, the council adopted decision (cfsp) 2018/2008 (4), extending the mandate of eucap sahel mali until 28 february 2019. (5) on 18 december 2018, the psc adopted decision (cfsp) 2018/2063 (5), extending the mandate of mr philippe rio as head of mission of eucap sahel mali from 15 january 2019 to 28 february 2019. (6) on 21 february 2019, the council adopted decision (cfsp) 2019/312 (6), extending the mandate of eucap sahel mali until 14 january 2021. (7) the high representative of the union for foreign affairs and security policy has proposed to extend the mandate of mr philippe rio as head of mission of eucap sahel mali from 1 march 2019 to 30 september 2020, has adopted this decision: article 1 the mandate of mr philippe rio as head of mission of eucap sahel mali is hereby extended until 30 september 2020. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. it shall apply from 1 march 2019. done at brussels, 22 february 2019. for the political and security committee the chairperson s. from-emmesberger (1) oj l 113, 16.4.2014, p. 21. (2) political and security committee decision (cfsp) 2017/1780 of 18 september 2017 on the appointment of the head of mission of the european union csdp mission in mali (eucap sahel mali) (eucap sahel mali/1/2017) (oj l 253, 30.9.2017, p. 37). (3) political and security committee decision (cfsp) 2018/57 of 9 january 2018 extending the mandate of the head of mission of the european union csdp mission in mali (eucap sahel mali) (eucap sahel mali/1/2018) (oj l 10, 13.1.2018, p. 14). (4) council decision (cfsp) 2018/2008 of 17 december 2018 amending and extending decision 2014/219/cfsp on the european union csdp mission in mali (eucap sahel mali) (oj l 322, 18.12.2018, p. 24). (5) political and security committee decision (cfsp) 2018/2063 of 18 december 2018 extending the mandate of the head of mission of the european union csdp mission in mali (eucap sahel mali) (eucap sahel mali/2/2018) (oj l 329, 27.12.2018, p. 26). (6) council decision (cfsp) 2019/312 of 21 february 2019 amending and extending decision 2014/219/cfsp on the european union csdp mission in mali (eucap sahel mali) (oj l 51, 22.2.2019, p. 29).

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/329 of 25 february 2019 laying down the specifications for the quality, resolution and use of fingerprints and facial image for biometric verification and identification in the entry/exit system (ees) type: decision_impl subject matter: natural and applied sciences; information and information processing; international law; politics and public safety; information technology and data processing date published: 2019-02-26 26.2.2019 en official journal of the european union l 57/18 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/329 of 25 february 2019 laying down the specifications for the quality, resolution and use of fingerprints and facial image for biometric verification and identification in the entry/exit system (ees) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to regulation (eu) 2017/2226 of the european parliament and of the council of 30 november 2017 establishing an entry/exit system (ees) to register entry and exit data and refusal of entry data of third-country nationals crossing the external borders of the member states and determining the conditions for access to the ees for law enforcement purposes and amending the convention implementing the schengen agreement and regulation (ec) no 767/2008 and regulation (eu) no 1077/2011 (1), and in particular points (a) and (b) of article 36 first paragraph thereof, whereas: (1) regulation (eu) 2017/2226 established the entry/exit system (ees) as a system which registers electronically the time and place of entry and exit of third-country nationals admitted for a short stay to the territory of the member states and which calculates the duration of their authorised stay. (2) the ees aims to improve the management of external borders, to prevent irregular immigration and to facilitate the management of migration flows. the ees should, in particular, contribute to the identification of any person who does not fulfil or no longer fulfils the conditions of the authorised stay on the territory of the member states. additionally, the ees should contribute to the prevention, detection and investigation of terrorist offences and of other serious criminal offences. (3) as quality and reliability of biometric data are key success factors for ees to reach its full potential, it is necessary to lay down the specifications for the quality, resolution and use of both fingerprints and facial image for biometric verification and identification in the ees, including where taken live or extracted electronically from the electronic machine readable travel document (emrtd). as the quality of registered fingerprints will have impacts years after registration on the proper functioning of the ees, environmental and operational factors of fingerprint quality registration should be closely monitored on the long run. (4) this decision does not create any new standards; it is coherent with icao standards. (5) based on those measures, the european agency for the operational management of large-scale information systems in the area of freedom, security and justice should then be able to define the design of the physical architecture of the ees including its communication infrastructure, as well as the technical specifications of the system and to develop the ees. (6) in this framework, it is thus necessary to adopt specifications for the quality, resolution and use of fingerprints and facial image for biometric verification and identification in the entry/exit system (ees). (7) this decision is without prejudice to the application of directive 2004/38/ec of the european parliament and of the council (2). (8) in accordance with articles 1 and 2 of protocol no 22 on the position of denmark, annexed to the treaty on european union and to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, denmark did not take part in the adoption of regulation (eu) 2017/2226 and is not bound by it or subject to its application. however, given that regulation (eu) 2017/2226 builds upon the schengen acquis, denmark, in accordance with article 4 of that protocol, notified on 30 may 2018 its decision to implement regulation (eu) 2017/2226 in its national law. denmark is therefore bound under international law to implement this decision. (9) this decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the schengen acquis in which the united kingdom does not take part, in accordance with council decision 2000/365/ec (3); the united kingdom is therefore not taking part in the adoption of this decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application. (10) this decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the schengen acquis in which ireland does not take part, in accordance with council decision 2002/192/ec (4); ireland is therefore not taking part in the adoption of this decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application. (11) as regards iceland and norway, this decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the schengen acquis within the meaning of the agreement concluded by the council of the european union and the republic of iceland and the kingdom of norway concerning the latter's association with the implementation, application and development of the schengen acquis (5), which fall within the area referred to in article 1, point a of council decision 1999/437/ec (6). (12) as regards switzerland, this decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the schengen acquis within the meaning of the agreement between the european union, the european community and the swiss confederation on the swiss confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the schengen acquis (7), which fall within the area referred to in article 1, point a of decision 1999/437/ec, read in conjunction with article 3 of council decision 2008/146/ec (8). (13) as regards liechtenstein, this decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the schengen acquis within the meaning of the protocol between the european union, the european community, the swiss confederation and the principality of liechtenstein on the accession of the principality of liechtenstein to the agreement between the european union, the european community and the swiss confederation on the swiss confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the schengen acquis (9) which fall within the area referred to in article 1, point a of decision 1999/437/ec read in conjunction with article 3 of council decision 2011/350/eu (10). (14) as regards cyprus, bulgaria, romania and croatia, the operation of the ees requires the granting of passive access to the vis and the putting into effect of all the provisions of the schengen acquis relating to the sis in accordance with the relevant council decisions. those conditions can only be met once the verification in accordance with the applicable schengen evaluation procedure has been successfully completed. therefore, the ees should be operated only by those member states which fulfil those conditions by the start of operations of the ees. member states not operating the ees from the initial start of operations should be connected to the ees in accordance with the procedure set out in regulation (eu) 2017/2226 as soon as all of those conditions are met. (15) the european data protection supervisor delivered an opinion on 27 july 2018. (16) the measures provided for in this decision are in accordance with the opinion of the smart borders committee, has adopted this decision: article 1 1. the specifications relating to the quality, resolution and use of fingerprints for biometric verification and identification in the ees are set out in the annex 2. the specifications for the quality, resolution and use of the facial image for biometric verification and identification in the ees, including where taken live or extracted electronically from the emrtd are set out in the annex. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at brussels, 25 february 2019. for the commission the president jean-claude juncker (1) oj l 327, 9.12.2017, p. 20. (2) directive 2004/38/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 29 april 2004 on the right of citizens of the union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the member states amending regulation (eec) no 1612/68 and repealing directives 64/221/eec, 68/360/eec, 72/194/eec, 73/148/eec, 75/34/eec, 75/35/eec, 90/364/eec, 90/365/eec and 93/96/eec (oj l 158, 30.4.2004, p. 77). (3) council decision 2000/365/ec of 29 may 2000 concerning the request of the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the schengen acquis (oj l 131, 1.6.2000, p. 43). (4) council decision 2002/192/ec of 28 february 2002 concerning ireland's request to take part in some of the provisions of the schengen acquis (oj l 64, 7.3.2002, p. 20). (5) oj l 176, 10.7.1999, p. 36. (6) council decision 1999/437/ec of 17 may 1999 on certain arrangements for the application of the agreement concluded by the council of the european union and the republic of iceland and the kingdom of norway concerning the association of those two states with the implementation, application and development of the schengen acquis (oj l 176, 10.7.1999, p. 31). (7) oj l 53, 27.2.2008, p. 52. (8) council decision 2008/146/ec of 28 january 2008 on the conclusion, on behalf of the european community, of the agreement between the european union, the european community and the swiss confederation on the swiss confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the schengen acquis (oj l 53, 27.2.2008, p. 1). (9) oj l 160, 18.6.2011, p. 21. (10) council decision 2011/350/eu of 7 march 2011 on the conclusion, on behalf of the european union, of the protocol between the european union, the european community, the swiss confederation and the principality of liechtenstein on the accession of the principality of liechtenstein to the agreement between the european union, the european community and the swiss confederation on the swiss confederation's association with the implementation, application and development of the schengen acquis, relating to the abolition of checks at internal borders and movement of persons (oj l 160, 18.6.2011, p. 19). annex 1. quality 1.1. thresholds 1.1.1. fingerprints enrolment at the moment of enrolment, the version 2.0 (or newer version) of the fingerprint image quality (nfiq) metric (1) defined by the national institute of standards and technology (nist) shall be used for verifying that the quality of the captured fingerprint data respects the thresholds that shall be specified in the technical specifications referred to in article 37(1) of regulation (eu) 2017/2226. for the purpose of enrolment, the quality of fingerprint data shall be assessed: at national level by member states at the time of capture prior to their transmission to the ees central system (cs-ees), optionally with the support of a tool provided, maintained and updated by eu-lisa, and, at central level. verification for the purpose of verification, it is recommended to assess the quality of fingerprints data by member states at the time of capture prior to their transmission to the cs-ees either by using version 2.0 (or newer version) of the nist fingerprint image quality (nfiq) metric or, where technically impossible, by using another metric which should preferably be correlated with the nfiq version 2.0 (or newer version). the correlation shall be derived a priori. if a nfiq version 2.0 (or newer version) quality metric is obtained, it has to be sent at the same time as the fingerprint data to the cs-ees. 1.1.2. facial images the quality of the facial images, including near infrared ones, shall comply with the thresholds specified in the technical specifications referred to in article 37(1) of regulation (eu) 2017/2226 and with the image requirements of iso/iec 19794-5:2011 frontal image type. the quality of the facial image shall be assessed at national level by member states at the time of capture prior to their transmission to the cs-ees, optionally with the support of a tool provided, maintained and updated by eu-lisa. the facial quality algorithm shall be comprehensible in terms of the iso/iec 19794-5:2011 criteria. the quality threshold for the facial images shall be fixed using a facial image quality assessment algorithm based on the quality measures outlined in iso 19794-5 and provide quality checks analogous to those implemented at the cs-ees (2). 1.2. performance values for biometric accuracy definitions the performance values for biometric accuracy defined in article 3 of regulation (eu) 2017/2226 are: (29) failure to enrol rate (fter) means the proportion of registrations with insufficient quality of the biometric enrolment; (30) false positive identification rate (fpir) means the proportion of returned matches during a biometric search which do not belong to the checked traveller; (31) false negative identification rate (fnir) means the proportion of missed matches during a biometric search even though the traveller's biometric data were registered. the biometric search referred to in points (30) and (31) is the same as a biometric identification or 1 to n search in compliance with article 36 first paragraph point (g) of regulation (eu) 2017/2226 the opportunity is left to the implementing act to define additional values of biometric performance. the false match(ing) rate (fmr) is the proportion of impostor attempts that are falsely declared to match a template of another object (a person's biometric template). the false non-match(ing) rate (fnmr) is the proportion of genuine attempts that are falsely declared not to match a template of the same object. a genuine attempt is a single attempt by a user to match his/her own stored template. an impostor attempt is the opposite a user's template is matched against someone else's template. 1.2.1. failure to enroll rate the target value for the failure to enroll rate is zero. member states shall take care to avoid such cases by using a quality-focused enrolment process. 1.2.2. accuracy of biometric verification the maximum values of the false non-matching rate (fnmr) at a false matching rate (fmr) = 0,05 % (5 per 10 000) are: type fmr fnmr fingerprint 0,05 % < 0,5 % facial image 0,05 % < 1 % 1.2.3. accuracy of biometric identification the maximum values of the false negative identification rate at a false positive identification rate = 0,1 % (1 per 1 000) are: type fpir fnir fingerprint 0,1 % < 1,5 % facial image and fingerprint (multi-modal) 0,1 % < 1 % 1.3. monitoring of biometric accuracy performance biometric accuracy performance shall be measured on the actual data captured by each member state based on a representative sample of cases on a daily basis at border crossing points of choice. the measurement is managed centrally, fully automated and does not require the access to personal data by the operator. the measurement of biometric performance does not need to be done continuously: it may be disabled or enabled but shall be carried out by eu-lisa on a regular basis (at least monthly). the measurement of biometric performance does not use biometric data itself. the templates of images used for the accuracy measurement are automatically deleted after execution of the evaluation process. all results of the performance measurement shall not contain personal information. 1.3.1. measurement of the fpir (false positive identification rate) the following figure shows that the templates for the biometric sample of both fingerprints and facial image are contained in the biometric matching system for a number n of identities. the measurement process shall be as follows: 1. a person subject to registration in the ees submits a sample of one or both of the two biometric modalities (fingerprints and facial image). 2. the biometric verification is conducted with the biometric reference data corresponding with the identity of the person (step 1 of the figure called default verification). 3. for a continuous sample set, the second biometric modality is obtained from the same person (either was submitted together with step 1 or it can be extracted from the biometric reference data corresponding to the identity of the person). the combined biometrics are used to run an identification on the complete gallery size excluding the biometrics of the person to whom the biometric sample belongs (step 2 of the figure called identification known to be negative). this identification process is expected to yield a zero result as the matching biometric sample has been voluntarily removed from the comparison. in the event the modality used in step 2 corresponds to the fingerprint, an identification (to evaluate the fingerprint identification accuracy) is carried out under the same conditions mentioned in the first subparagraph. 4. in the case where the biometric identification returns a biometric sample (indicated as match above threshold) this is a known false positive identification (another person than the expected one is returned). steps 1 and 2 belong to the identity verification process that is part of the ees. steps 3 and 4 do not belong to the identity verification process and are done for measuring the biometric accuracy performance. the fpir (false positive identification rate) is computed as: 1.3.2. measurement of fnir (false negative identification rate) the figure in point 1.3.1 applies to the description that follows. the measurement process shall apply the following logic where the first two steps are always the same as they belong to the identity verification process that is part of the ees: 1. a person subject to registration in the ees submits a sample of one or both of the two biometric modalities. 2. the biometric verification is conducted with the biometric reference data corresponding with the identity of the person (step 1 of the figure called default verification). 3. for a continuous sample set, a second biometric modality is obtained either from the same person in the case both biometric modalities were submitted in step 1 or from another person for whom steps 1 and 2 of this process were triggered). the combined biometrics are used to run an identification on the complete gallery size including the biometrics of the person(s) to whom the biometric sample belongs. this identification process is expected to yield the known result as the matching biometric sample is included in the comparison. 4. in the event the modality used in step 2 corresponds to the fingerprint, an identification (to evaluate the fingerprint identification accuracy) is carried out under the same conditions mentioned in paragraph 3. 5. in the case where the biometric identification does not return the expected biometric sample (indicated as match above threshold) in the hit list, this is a known false negative identification. steps 1 and 2 belong to the identity verification process that is part of the ees. steps 3 and 4 do not belong to the identity verification process and are done for measuring the biometric accuracy performance. the fnir (false negative identification rate) is computed as: 1.3.3. measurement of the biometric accuracy for verification (false matching rate and false non matching rate) the measurement process shall apply the following logic: 1. a person to whom the ees applies submits a sample of one of the two biometric modalities. 2. the biometric verification is conducted with the biometric reference data corresponding with the identity of the person (step 1 of the figure called default verification). steps 1 and 2 belong to the identity verification process that is part of the ees. the measurement of the biometric accuracy starts from here. 3. the verification of the biometric sample is executed vs a number of other biometric samples randomly taken from the biometric gallery which do not include the biometrics provided. the expected result is that the verifications will fail (this refers to point 2 of the figure verifications known to be non-mated). any match would mean a false match. step 3 allows the calculation of the false matching rate (the match occurs with another person than the owner of the data): note: the number of non mated comparisons is the number of comparisons done under step 3) step 2 allows the calculation of the false non matching rate (the match does not occur with the owner of the biometrics), in the case the identity has been confirmed by other means, on the basis of note: the number of mated comparisons is called assumed as there is no absolute certainty that an impostor is not included in the set of identities the comparison is made with. 1.4. replacement of biometrics to improve the quality or to replace a picture which was extracted from the emrtd with a live capture facial image of the cs-ees gallery replacement of biometrics shall only occur upon successful biometric verification of the identity. 1.4.1. replacement of the stored fingerprint data the procedure for replacement of stored fingerprint data, which does not reach the required quality, shall be described in the practical handbook referred to in article 71 of regulation (eu) 2017/2226. in the case of replacement of the left hand by the right hand (or vice versa), an identification with the newly captured fingerprints shall be launched to guarantee it does not correspond to another identity already registered into the system. 1.4.2. replacement of the stored facial images the procedure for replacement of a stored facial image, which does not reach the required quality, or which was extracted from the chip of the electronic machine readable travel document, shall be described in the practical handbook referred to in article 71 of regulation (eu) 2017/2226. 2. resolution 2.1. fingerprints the cs-ees shall receive fingerprint data of a nominal resolution of either 500 or 1 000 ppi (with an acceptable deviation of +/ 10 ppi) with 256 grey levels. the fingerprint data shall be submitted in accordance with the ansi/nist-itl 1-2011 update 2015 standard (or newer version) and as specified in the technical specifications referred to in article 37(1) of regulation (eu) 2017/2226. 2.2. facial images 2.2.1. definition the cs-ees shall receive live facial images at a resolution (in portrait mode) of minimum of 600 pixels by 800 pixels and maximum of 1 200 pixels by 1 600 pixels. the face shall occupy a sufficient space within the image so as to ensure that there is a minimum of 120 pixels between the centres of the eyes. 2.2.2. colours when a facial image is taken live, it shall be a colour image. in exceptional cases when a colour image cannot be captured, grayscale or near infrared capture may be used. in such a case, if the quality of the grayscale or near infrared image is sufficient, it may be used for verification or identification but not for enrolment. grayscale images are accepted for enrolment only when they are extracted from the chip of the travel document. specific rules concerning the near infrared facial images shall be described in the handbook in accordance with article 71 of regulation (eu) 2017/2226. 3. use of biometrics 3.1. entry and storage 3.1.1. fingerprints cs-ees shall store the fingerprint data from four fingers flat (3). when available, fingerprints from the following fingers of the right hand shall be used: the index finger, middle finger, ring finger, little finger. where it is impossible to obtain any fingerprint using the mentioned fingers of the right hand, the four fingerprints shall be captured from the left hand, where available. in such cases where the impossibility to obtain four fingerprints of the right hands is of a temporary nature, the fingerprint data shall be explicitly marked and, if the temporary impossibility does not exist anymore, the fingerprint data of the right hand shall be taken on exit or at subsequent entry in accordance with the technical specifications referred to in article 37(1) of regulation (eu) 2017/2226 (temporary impossibility). in order to meet the applicable threshold, the re-capture of fingerprint data should be undertaken, if necessary, twice for any particular data subject (i.e. a total of three capture attempts should be made). re-capture attempts should involve use of all fingers as initially attempted. fingerprint data that do not meet the applicable quality threshold: (1) shall be stored in the cs-ees; (a) biometric verifications shall be done against those data; (b) biometric identifications shall not be done against fingerprints not meeting the quality threshold except in the case of law enforcement purposes; (2) shall be flagged by the national system in accordance with the technical specifications referred to in article 37(1) of regulation (eu) 2017/2226 (technical impossibility) to allow their capture at the next border crossing. the nist file sent by national systems to cs-ees and stored there, shall also contain the conditions of fingerprint registration including the level of monitoring carried out by the authorities and the method used for acquiring four finger flat images, as specified by the ansi/nist-itl 1-2011: update 2015 standard (4) (or newer version). 3.1.2. facial image cs-ees shall store the live facial image captured at the border crossing point and submitted as part of a nist container to the cs-ees as specified by the ansi/nist-itl 1-2011: update 2015 standard (or newer version). in exceptional cases, where it is impossible to obtain a facial image of sufficient quality from the live subject, enrolment from the document chip of an electronic machine readable travel document (emrtd) is requested, where it is technically accessible and after successful electronic verification according to the process that shall be described in the practical handbook referred to in article 71 of regulation (eu) 2017/2226. images scanned from the biographic page of the travel document shall be not used and shall not be transmitted to the cs-ees. the photographs of visa applicants stored in the visa information system (vis) established pursuant to regulation (ec) no 767/2008 of the european parliament and of the council (5) shall not be used for carrying out any electronic biometric verification or identification with the cs-ees. due to practical reasons, the quality threshold of facial images captured from live persons solely for the purposes of verification against those stored in the cs-ees are not compulsory. successful verification according to the agreed matching score thresholds would however require images with sufficient quality even in these cases. in order to meet the set quality threshold, particularly when it is impossible to extract electronically a facial image from the chip of an electronic emrtd (6), the following measures shall apply: (1) in cases where the face capture unit enrols images in a continuous stream, re-capture shall be taken over sufficient amount of time, so that the optimal image obtained within the capture stream is transmitted to the cs-ees. a lower-quality sample sent shall be flagged as such by the cs-ees as specified in the technical specifications referred to in article 37(1) of regulation (eu) 2017/2226. (2) in cases where the face capture unit enrols static single images upon activation by an operator, a sufficient amount of recaptures shall be taken, so that the optimal image obtained is transmitted to the cs-ees. a lower-quality sample transmitted shall be flagged as such to the cs-ees as specified in the technical specifications referred to in article 37(1) of regulation (eu) 2017/2226. a best practice guide to be followed for capturing facial images referred to in the previous two points of this paragraph shall be included in the practical handbook referred to in article 71 of regulation (eu) 2017/2226. 3.1.3. image compression fingerprint images the compression algorithm to be used shall follow the nist recommendations. as a result, the fingerprint data with a resolution of 500 ppi shall be compressed using the wsq algorithm (iso/iec 19794) while 1 000 ppi fingerprint data shall use the jpeg 2000 image compression standard (iso/iec 15444-1) and coding system. the target compression ratio is 15:1. facial images images compressed with jpg (iso/iec 10918) or jpeg 2000 (jp2) (iso/iec 15444-1) image compression standard and coding system shall be submitted to the cs-ees as specified in the technical specifications referred to in article 37(1) of regulation (eu) 2017/2226. the maximum allowed image compression rate is 1:20. 3.2. biometric verifications 3.2.1. fingerprints cs-ees shall be able to perform biometric verifications using one, two or four fingers flat. in the case where four fingers flat are used, fingerprint data from the following fingers shall be used: the index finger, middle finger, ring finger, little finger. in the case where one or two fingers flat are used, the following fingers shall be used by default: (a) one finger: index finger; (b) two fingers: index finger and middle finger. alternatively, the following fingers may be used: (a) one finger: the first finger available for acquisition by the following order index finger, middle finger, ring finger, little finger. (b) two fingers: the first two fingers available for acquisition by the following order index finger, middle finger and ring finger. little finger may be also considered as a second one (only) for verification, should no other possibility exist. in all cases: (a) the fingerprint data shall be captured from the hand used for the enrolment. (b) the finger-position shall be identified for each individual fingerprint image as specified by the ansi/nist-itl 1-2011: update 2015 standard (or newer version). (c) a verification based on permutation (7) ensures that fingerprints from each of the two sets are matched against each other, regardless of their position in the set. it shall be possible to enable or disable this functionality at central level, impacting all users. in cases of permanent or temporary physical impossibility to be fingerprinted, the fingerprints shall always be identified as specified by the ansi/nist-itl 1-2011: update 2015 standard (or newer version) and the ees interface control document 3.2.2. facial image cs-ees shall perform biometric verifications using live captured facial images. 3.3. biometric identifications and searches 3.3.1. for the purposes defined in the chapter 3 of regulation (eu) 2017/2226 for purposes other than law enforcement multiple search configurations shall be available. there shall be at least one search configuration fulfilling the requirements defined in the commission implementing decision laying down performance requirements of the entry/exit system (ees) (8) and further possible search configurations having different accuracy performance specifications (less strict or stricter). using fingerprints for purposes other than law enforcement, cs-ees shall perform biometric identifications and searches either with four fingers flat, or with four fingers flat combined with the live captured facial image and only on biometric data which meet the applicable quality thresholds. the biometric identification shall be performed using the fingerprint data with at most one image per finger type (nist identification 1 to 10). fingerprint data from the following fingers shall be used: the index finger, middle finger, ring finger, little finger. fingerprints from the same hand shall be used, starting with the right hand. the fingerprint data shall be correctly labelled as to which finger it relates. in cases of permanent or temporary physical impossibility, the fingerprints shall always be identified accordingly as specified by the ansi/nist-itl 1-2011: update 2015 standard (9) (or newer version) and the remaining fingers, if any, shall be used. in the case where identifications are performed in a scope other than border checks, the cs-ees shall be capable to accept rolled fingerprints from authorities with access to ees allowed to use also rolled fingerprints under a different european regulation. if the authority performs an identification with fingers of both hands, the cs-ees shall perform two identifications, one with the fingers of the right hand and one with the fingers of the left hand. using the facial image cs-ees shall perform biometric searches using live captured facial image in combination with fingerprint data in accordance with the rules defined in the above section using fingerprints 3.3.2. for law enforcement purposes only for law enforcement purposes, searches may be performed on the basis of the following biometric data: fingerprint data sets containing at least one fingerprint; rolled and unsegmented slap fingerprint data; latent fingerprints; facial image in combination with fingerprint data; facial image only. in case of fingerprints searches, permutation (10) of hands shall be performed in the scope of law enforcement searches. the use of permutation of hands shall be configurable (enable/disable) on central side, impacting all users. identification for law enforcement purposes with fingerprints shall be conducted on all stored fingerprints without account to fingerprint quality, or only on those meeting a certain quality threshold defined in the user search configuration used for the search. the cs-ees shall provide the matching biometric data to the requesting ms together with the indication of the quality of the retrieved fingerprints. in the event of a match with fingerprints of low quality, the law enforcement authority shall be informed that additional verifications are required in order to confirm the match. the tresholds indicating low data quality requiring additional verifications shall be specified in the technical specifications referred to in article 37(1) of regulation (eu) 2017/2226. biometric searches using only the facial image modality may be executed for the sole purpose of article 32(2) of regulation (eu) 2017/2226. in that case the user shall specify the capping value of the number of returned candidate matches. the maximum number of returned files is four hundred. in a first step, the user shall gain access to two hundred best matching files. if necessary, the access to the remaining two hundred files shall be granted by the system, if the user confirms that the initial search did not lead to a successful match. (1) https://www.nist.gov/services-resources/software/development-nfiq-20 (2) where possible an assessment and validation of the facial images against the criteria of icao document 9303 3.9, and the french visual and user recommendation for french visa applications shall be performed. (3) the term flat is used in accordance with the iso/iec dictionary and is the same as the term plain used in the ansi//nist standard. (4) ansi/nist-itl 1-2011 standard data format for the interchange of fingerprint, facial, scar mark & tattoo (smt) information, accessible on: https://www.nist.gov/publications/data-format-interchange-fingerprint-facial-other-biometric-information-ansinist-itl-1-1. (5) regulation (ec) no 767/2008 of the european parliament and of the council of 9 july 2008 concerning the visa information system (vis) and the exchange of data between member states on short-stay visas (vis regulation) (oj l 218, 13.8.2008, p. 60). (6) this may be the case when the traveler does not possess an electronic document, or in instances when their travel document contains a facial image token rather than the image itself, as permitted by icao document 9303, for example. (7) permutation is a specific configuration mode of the biometric matching system, which ensures that fingerprints from each of the two sets are matched against each other, regardless of their position in the set. this ensures the elimination of potential human errors in regards to the order of the fingers as well as the highest possible biometric accuracy for verification. (8) c(2019) 1260. (9) idem. (10) permutation of hands allows for comparing fingerprints of one hand with the one of the other hand. this is improving the matching accuracy in the case the sample hand is not known.

name: decision (eu) 2019/322 of the european central bank of 31 january 2019 on delegation of the power to adopt decisions regarding supervisory powers granted under national law (ecb/2019/4) type: decision subject matter: european union law; eu institutions and european civil service; sources and branches of the law; economic geography; monetary economics; financial institutions and credit; free movement of capital date published: 2019-02-25 25.2.2019 en official journal of the european union l 55/7 decision (eu) 2019/322 of the european central bank of 31 january 2019 on delegation of the power to adopt decisions regarding supervisory powers granted under national law (ecb/2019/4) the governing council of the european central bank, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to council regulation (eu) no 1024/2013 of 15 october 2013 conferring specific tasks on the european central bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions (1), and in particular article 4(1)(d) and (e), and articles 4(3) and 9(1) thereof, having regard to decision (eu) 2017/933 of the european central bank of 16 november 2016 on a general framework for delegating decision-making powers for legal instruments related to supervisory tasks (ecb/2016/40) (2), and in particular article 4 thereof, whereas: (1) within the framework of article 6 of regulation (eu) no 1024/2013, the european central bank (ecb) carries out the exclusive task to supervise credit institutions with the aim to ensure a consistent application of supervisory standards, to foster financial stability and to ensure a level playing field. (2) article 4(3) of regulation (eu) no 1024/2013 provides that the ecb must apply all relevant union law, and where this union law is composed of directives, the national legislation transposing those directives. (3) pursuant to the second subparagraph of article 9(1) of regulation (eu) no 1024/2013, for the purpose of carrying out the tasks conferred on it, the ecb has all the powers and obligations set out in regulation (eu) no 1024/2013 and all the powers and obligations which competent authorities have under the relevant union law. the ecb's competence extends to the exercise of supervisory powers granted under national law that are not explicitly provided for in union law as long as such powers fall within the ecb's tasks under article 4 of regulation (eu) no 1024/2013 and underpin a supervisory function. the ecb, as the competent authority, is required to adopt a substantial number of decisions regarding supervisory powers granted under national law each year. (4) to facilitate the decision-making process a delegation decision is necessary regarding the adoption of such decisions. the court of justice of the european union has recognised delegation of authority to be necessary to enable an institution required to adopt a considerable number of decisions to perform its duties. similarly, it has recognised the need to ensure that decision-making bodies are able to function as a principle inherent to all institutional systems (3). (5) delegation of decision-making powers should be limited and proportionate, and the scope of the delegation should be clearly defined. (6) decision (eu) 2017/933 (ecb/2016/40) specifies the procedure to be followed for adopting delegation decisions concerning supervision and the persons who may be delegated decision-making powers. that decision does not affect the ecb's exercise of its supervisory tasks and is without prejudice to the supervisory board's competence to propose complete draft decisions to the governing council. (7) where the criteria for the adoption of a delegated decision, as laid down in this decision, are not met, decisions should be adopted in accordance with the non-objection procedure set out in article 26(8) of regulation (eu) no 1024/2013 and further specified in article 13g of decision ecb/2004/2 (4). furthermore, the non-objection procedure should also be used if the heads of work units have concerns regarding the fulfilment of assessment criteria for the national powers decisions due to the complexity of the assessment. (8) ecb supervisory decisions may be subject to administrative review pursuant to article 24 of regulation (eu) no 1024/2013 and as further specified in decision ecb/2014/16 (5). in the event of such administrative review, the supervisory board should take into account the opinion of the administrative board of review and submit a new draft decision to the governing council for adoption under the non-objection procedure, has adopted this decision: article 1 definitions for the purposes of this decision, the following definitions shall apply: (1) national powers decisions mean decisions taken by the ecb in exercise of its supervisory powers granted under national law that are not explicitly provided for in union law; (2) acquisition of a holding means the acquisition of a direct or indirect holding of capital or of voting rights in another entity, including as a result of the establishment of a new entity, other than the acquisition of a qualifying holding within the meaning of article 22 of directive 2013/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council (6); (3) merger means (a) an operation whereby one or more companies, on being dissolved with or without going into liquidation, transfer all of their assets and liabilities to an existing company or a new company, in exchange for the issue to their shareholders of securities or shares representing the capital of that existing company or new company, or (b) any transaction that is a merger under the relevant national law; (4) demerger means (a) an operation whereby one or more companies split part of their assets and liabilities and form a new company that holds these assets and liabilities, or (b) any transaction that is a demerger under the relevant national law; (5) third country or territory means a country or territory outside the european economic area; (6) related party means a natural person that is related to a credit institution or a close member of that person's family, or a legal person that is related to a credit institution, in accordance with the relevant national law; (7) srep decision means the decision adopted by the ecb on the basis of article 16 of regulation (eu) no 1024/2013 following the annual supervisory review and evaluation process within the meaning of article 97 of directive 2013/36/eu; (8) liquidity coverage ratio (lcr) means the ratio as defined in article 4 of the commission delegated regulation (eu) 2015/61 (7); (9) equivalent supervisory and regulatory standards are supervisory and regulatory requirements or arrangements applied by a third country or territory that are recognised by the european commission as equivalent to those applied in the union in accordance with articles 107(4) and 114(7) of regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council (8). the relevant third countries and territories are listed in annexes i and iv to commission implementing decision 2014/908/eu (9); (10) delegation decision and delegated decision have the same meaning as in points (2) and (4) of article 3 of decision (eu) 2017/933 (ecb/2016/40), respectively; (11) heads of work units means the heads of work units of the ecb to whom the power to adopt national powers decisions is delegated; (12) non-objection procedure means the procedure set out in article 26(8) of regulation (eu) no 1024/2013, and further specified in article 13g of decision ecb/2004/2; (13) negative decision means a decision that does not or does not fully grant the permission as requested by the significant supervised entity. a decision with ancillary provisions such as conditions or obligations shall be considered as a negative decision unless such ancillary provisions (a) ensure that the supervised entity fulfils the requirements of relevant national law and have been agreed in writing, or (b) merely restate one or more of the existing requirements that the institution has to comply with pursuant to a relevant provision of national law or require information on the fulfilment of one or more of such requirements; (14) significant supervised entity means a significant supervised entity as defined in point (16) of article 2 of regulation (eu) no 468/2014 of the european central bank (ecb/2014/17) (10); (15) branch means a branch as defined in article 4(1)(17) of regulation (eu) no 575/2013; (16) representative office means an office that promotes or assists the activities of a supervised entity but which does not carry out the business of a credit institution; (17) non-core support services means administrative services, customer services, debt collection, e-signatures or other similar services in connection with the business of a credit institution; (18) ecb guide means any document, adopted by the governing council upon a proposal from the supervisory board and published on the ecb's website and which gives guidance on the ecb's interpretation of legal requirements. article 2 subject matter and scope 1. this decision specifies the criteria for the delegation of decision-making powers to the heads of work units of the ecb for the adoption of national powers decisions. 2. the delegation of decision-making powers is without prejudice to the supervisory assessment to be performed for the purposes of taking national powers decisions. article 3 delegation of national powers decisions 1. in accordance with article 4 of decision (eu) 2017/933 (ecb/2016/40), the governing council hereby delegates to the heads of work units of the ecb, nominated by the executive board in accordance with article 5 of that decision, the power to adopt national powers decisions in relation to the following: (a) acquisitions of holdings; (b) acquisitions of assets or liabilities; (c) sales of holdings; (d) sales of assets or liabilities; (e) mergers; (f) demergers; (g) operations in third countries or territories; (h) outsourcing; (i) amendments to statutes; (j) appointments of external auditors; (k) credit to related parties. 2. the national powers decisions referred to in paragraph 1 shall be adopted by means of a delegated decision if the relevant criteria for the adoption of delegated decisions set out in articles 4 to 14 are fulfilled. 3. national powers decisions shall not be adopted by means of a delegated decision if national law requires supervisory approval of credit institutions' strategic measures or if the complexity of the assessment requires that they are adopted under the non-objection procedure. 4. any delegation of decision-making powers applies both to the adoption of supervisory decisions and to the approval of positive assessments by the ecb where a supervisory decision is not required under national law. 5. negative decisions shall not be adopted by means of a delegated decision. 6. where a decision may not be adopted by means of a delegated decision, it shall be adopted in accordance with the non-objection procedure. article 4 criteria for the adoption of delegated decisions on acquisitions of holdings 1. decisions on the approval of acquisitions of holdings in credit institutions or non-credit institutions by a significant supervised entity shall be taken by means of a delegated decision if all of the following criteria are met: (a) the impact on the own funds of the acquiring significant supervised entity is limited, which means that: (i) following the acquisition, the own funds exceed and are estimated to continue exceeding the sum of the requirements laid down in article 92(1) of regulation (eu) no 575/2013, the own funds required to be held in accordance with article 16(2)(a) of regulation (eu) no 1024/2013, the combined buffer requirement as defined in point (6) of article 128 of directive 2013/36/eu and the pillar 2 capital guidance as set out in the last available srep decision; and (ii) the impact of the reduction on the common equity tier 1 capital ratio, the tier 1 capital ratio and the total capital ratio is below 100 basis points. (b) the impact on the liquidity situation of the acquiring significant supervised entity is limited, which means that: (i) the lcr remains above 110 % and is above the liquidity requirements set out in the last available srep decision, if these are higher than the required minimum lcr; (ii) at consolidated level, the lcr is not reduced by more than 50 %; (c) the target entity is located in a member state of the union or of the european economic area, or in a third country or territory with equivalent supervisory and regulatory standards. 2. the assessment of acquisitions of holdings shall be carried out in accordance with the relevant provisions of national law, also taking into consideration any applicable ecb guides and/or national competent authorities' policy stances, guidance or similar acts. article 5 criteria for the adoption of delegated decisions on acquisitions of assets or liabilities 1. decisions on the approval of acquisitions of assets or liabilities in credit institutions or non-credit institutions by a significant supervised entity shall be taken by means of a delegated decision if all of the following criteria are met: (a) the impact on the own funds of the acquiring significant supervised entity, as a result of the acquisition, is limited, which means that: (i) following the acquisition, the own funds exceed and are estimated to continue exceeding the sum of the requirements laid down in article 92(1) of regulation (eu) no 575/2013, the own funds required to be held in accordance with article 16(2)(a) of regulation (eu) no 1024/2013, the combined buffer requirement as defined in point (6) of article 128 of directive 2013/36/eu and the pillar 2 capital guidance as set out in the last available srep decision; and (ii) the impact of the reduction on the common equity tier 1 capital ratio, the tier 1 capital ratio and the total capital ratio is below 100 basis points; (b) the impact on the liquidity situation of the acquiring significant supervised entity, as a result of the acquisition, is limited, which means that: (i) the lcr remains above 110 % and is above the liquidity requirements set out in the last available srep decision, if these are higher than the required minimum lcr, and (ii) at consolidated level, the lcr is not reduced by more than 50 %; (c) the value of the assets and liabilities that are acquired does not exceed 25 % of the total assets of the acquiring significant supervised entity at individual level. 2. the assessment of acquisitions of assets or liabilities shall be carried out in accordance with the relevant provisions of national law, also taking into consideration any applicable ecb guides and/or national competent authorities' policy stances, guidance or similar acts. article 6 criteria for the adoption of delegated decisions on sales of holdings 1. decisions on the approval of sales of holdings by a significant supervised entity shall be taken by means of a delegated decision if all of the following criteria are met: (a) the impact on the own funds of the selling significant supervised entity is limited, which means that: (i) following the sale, the own funds exceed and are estimated to continue exceeding the sum of the requirements laid down in article 92(1) of regulation (eu) no 575/2013, the own funds required to be held in accordance with article 16(2)(a) of regulation (eu) no 1024/2013, the combined buffer requirement as defined in point (6) of article 128 of directive 2013/36/eu and the pillar 2 capital guidance as set out in the last available srep decision; and (ii) the impact of the reduction on the common equity tier 1 capital ratio, the tier 1 capital ratio and the total capital ratio is below 100 basis points; (b) the impact on the liquidity situation of the selling significant supervised entity is limited, which means that: (i) the lcr remains above 110 % and is above the liquidity requirements set out in the last available srep decision, if these are higher than the required minimum lcr; and (ii) at consolidated level, the lcr is not reduced by more than 50 %. 2. the assessment of sales of holdings shall be carried out in accordance with the relevant provisions of national law, also taking into consideration any applicable ecb guides and/or national competent authorities' policy stances, guidance or similar acts. article 7 criteria for the adoption of delegated decisions on sales of assets or liabilities 1. decisions on the approval of sales of assets or liabilities by a significant supervised entity shall be taken by means of a delegated decision if all of the following criteria are met: (a) the impact on the own funds of the selling significant supervised entity, as a result of the sale of assets or liabilities, is limited, which means that: (i) following the sale, the own funds exceed and are estimated to continue exceeding the sum of the requirements laid down in article 92(1) of regulation (eu) no 575/2013, the own funds required to be held in accordance with article 16(2)(a) of regulation (eu) no 1024/2013, the combined buffer requirement as defined in point (6) of article 128 of directive 2013/36/eu and the pillar 2 capital guidance as set out in the last available srep decision; and (ii) the impact of the reduction on the common equity tier 1 capital ratio, the tier 1 capital ratio and the total capital ratio is below 100 basis points; (b) the impact on the liquidity situation of the selling significant supervised entity, as a result of the sale of assets or liabilities, is limited, which means that: (i) the lcr remains above 110 % and is above the liquidity requirements set out in the last available srep decision, if these are higher than the required minimum lcr; and (ii) at consolidated level, the lcr is not reduced by more than 50 %; (c) the value of the assets or liabilities that are sold does not exceed 25 % of the total assets of the selling significant supervised entity at individual level. 2. the assessment of sales of assets or liabilities shall be carried out in accordance with the relevant provisions of national law, also taking into consideration any applicable ecb guides and/or national competent authorities' policy stances, guidance or similar acts. article 8 criteria for the adoption of delegated decisions on mergers 1. decisions on the approval of mergers involving at least one significant supervised entity shall be taken by means of a delegated decision if all of the following criteria are met: (a) the impact on the own funds of the significant supervised entity resulting from the merger is limited, which means that: (i) following the merger, the own funds exceed and are estimated to continue exceeding the sum of the requirements laid down in article 92(1) of regulation (eu) no 575/2013, the own funds required to be held in accordance with article 16(2)(a) of regulation (eu) no 1024/2013, the combined buffer requirement as defined in point (6) of article 128 of directive 2013/36/eu and, where applicable, the pillar 2 capital guidance as set out in the last available srep decision; and (ii) the impact of the reduction on the common equity tier 1 capital ratio, the tier 1 capital ratio and the total capital ratio is below 100 basis points; (b) the impact on the liquidity situation of the significant supervised entity resulting from the merger is limited, which means that: (i) the lcr remains above 110 % and is above the liquidity requirements set out in the last available srep decision, if these are higher than the required minimum lcr; and (ii) at consolidated level, the lcr is not reduced by more than 50 %; (c) the governance structure of the significant supervised entity resulting from the merger does not raise supervisory concerns. 2. decision-making powers shall in no circumstances be delegated to the heads of the work units in respect of the following: (a) mergers between one significant supervised entity and another entity that does not belong to the same group of the significant supervised entity; or (b) cross-border mergers between significant supervised entities that belong to the same group. 3. the assessment of mergers shall be carried out in accordance with the relevant provisions of national law, also taking into consideration any applicable ecb guides and/or national competent authorities' policy stances, guidance or similar acts. article 9 criteria for the adoption of delegated decisions on demergers 1. decisions on the approval of demergers involving at least one significant supervised entity shall be taken by means of a delegated decision if all of the following criteria are met: (a) the impact on the own funds of the significant supervised entity or entities resulting from the demerger is limited, which means that: (i) following the demerger, the own funds exceed and are estimated to continue exceeding the sum of the requirements laid down in article 92(1) of regulation (eu) no 575/2013, the own funds required to be held in accordance with article 16(2)(a) of regulation (eu) no 1024/2013, the combined buffer requirement as defined in point (6) of article 128 of directive 2013/36/eu and, where applicable, the pillar 2 capital guidance as set out in the last available srep decision; and (ii) the impact of the reduction on the common equity tier 1 capital ratio, the tier 1 capital ratio and the total capital ratio is below 100 basis points. (b) the impact on the liquidity situation of the significant supervised entity or entities resulting from the demerger is limited, which means that: (i) the lcr remains above 110 % and is above the liquidity requirements set out in the last available srep decision, if these are higher than the required minimum lcr, and (ii) at consolidated level, the lcr is not reduced by more than 50 %; (c) the governance structure of the significant supervised entity or entities resulting from the demerger does not raise supervisory concerns. 2. decision-making powers shall in no circumstances be delegated to the heads of the work units in respect of the following: (a) demergers that result in the establishment of another entity that does not belong to the same group of the significant supervised entity; or (b) demergers that result in the establishment of an entity in a different country or territory from that in which the significant supervised entity is established. 3. the assessment of a demerger shall be carried out in accordance with the relevant provisions of national law, also taking into consideration any applicable ecb guides and/or national competent authorities' policy stances, guidance or similar acts. article 10 criteria for the adoption of delegated decisions on operations in third countries or territories 1. decisions approving the establishment of a branch by a significant supervised entity in a third country or territory shall be taken by means of a delegated decision if all of the following criteria are met: (a) the branch is established in a third country or territory with equivalent supervisory and regulatory standards; (b) the total assets of the branch as estimated in the programme of operations do not exceed 10 % of the total assets of the significant supervised entity; and (c) the branch carries out transactions that are primarily executed in the third country or territory where the branch is established. 2. decisions on the following operations by a significant supervised entity shall be taken by means of a delegated decision: (a) the closure of a branch; (b) changes in branch structures; (c) the establishment or closure of a representative office; and (d) the provision of banking services in a third country or territory without the establishment of a physical presence there in the form of a branch or a subsidiary, unless the relevant operations are undertaken in a country included in the list in the annex to commission delegated regulation (eu) 2016/1675 (11). 3. the assessment of operations in third countries or territories shall be carried out in accordance with the relevant provisions of national law, also taking into consideration any applicable ecb guides and/or national competent authorities' policy stances, guidance or similar acts. article 11 criteria for the adoption of delegated decisions on outsourcing 1. decisions on the approval of outsourcing of activities by a significant supervised entity shall be taken by means of a delegated decision if one or more of the following criteria is met: (a) the service provider is part of the same group as the significant supervised entity (intragroup outsourcing) and is established in the union; or (b) the service provider is a supervised entity that is established in the union and authorised to perform the outsourced services; or (c) the outsourcing concerns non-core support services and the service provider is established in the union or the european economic area. 2. the assessment of outsourcing projects shall be carried out in accordance with the relevant provisions of national law, also taking into consideration any applicable ecb guides and/or national competent authorities' policy stances, guidance or similar acts. article 12 criteria for the adoption of delegated decisions on amendments to statutes 1. decisions on the approval of amendments to the statutes of a significant supervised entity shall be taken by means of a delegated decision in the following cases: (a) amendments that are purely formal including changes of name and address; (b) amendments that simply transpose statutory requirements of a legislative or regulatory nature; (c) amendments that implement a judicial or administrative decision or which are made at the request of the ecb; (d) amendments concerning the share capital of the significant supervised entity if the related own funds decision (e.g. on the classification of capital instruments as common equity tier 1 instruments or the reduction of own funds) is also delegated; (e) amendments to the statutes of a subsidiary to align them with the statutes of its parent undertaking if the amendments to the latter have already been approved by the ecb. 2. the assessment of amendments to statutes shall be carried out in accordance with the relevant provisions of national law, also taking into consideration any applicable ecb guides and/or national competent authorities' policy stances, guidance or similar acts. article 13 criteria for the adoption of delegated decisions on appointments of or changes to external auditors 1. decisions on appointments of or changes to external auditors of a significant supervised entity shall be taken by means of a delegated decision where such decisions constitute, under the relevant national law, the exercise of prudential supervision pursuant to article 4 of regulation (eu) no 1024/2013. 2. decision-making powers shall in no circumstances be delegated to the heads of the work units in respect of (a) decisions concerning the replacement of an external auditor by another one appointed by the competent supervisory authority, or (b) decisions concerning the appointment of an external auditor at the direction of the competent supervisory authority. 3. the assessment of the suitability of external auditors shall be carried out in accordance with the relevant provisions of national law, also taking into consideration any applicable ecb guides and/or national competent authorities' policy stances, guidance or similar acts. article 14 criteria for the adoption of delegated decisions on credit to related parties 1. decisions on the approval of the provision of credit by a significant supervised entity to a related party shall be taken by means of a delegated decision if all the following criteria are met: (a) the total exposure of the significant supervised entity towards the related party does not exceed eur 5 million; and (b) the terms and conditions applicable to the provision of credit are not more favourable than those pursuant to which credit is provided to clients that are not related parties, or are at least similar to those applicable to the same type of operations entered into with employees who are not related parties of the significant supervised entity. 2. the assessment of the provision of credit to a related party shall be carried out in accordance with the relevant provisions of national law, also taking into consideration any applicable ecb guides and/or national competent authorities' policy stances, guidance or similar acts. article 15 transitional provision this decision shall not apply in cases where the application requesting approval for any of the operations referred to in article 3(1) was submitted to the ecb prior to the entry into force of this decision. article 16 entry into force this decision shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at frankfurt am main, 31 january 2019. the president of the ecb mario draghi (1) oj l 287, 29.10.2013, p. 63. (2) oj l 141, 1.6.2017, p. 14. (3) see, for example, judgment of the court of justice of 23 september 1986, akzo chemie v commission, 5/85, ecli:eu:c:1986:328, paragraph 37; and judgment of the court of justice of 26 may 2005, carmine salvatore tralli v ecb, c-301/02 p, ecli:eu:c:2005:306, paragraph 59. (4) decision ecb/2004/2 of 19 february 2004 adopting the rules of procedure of the european central bank (oj l 80, 18.3.2004, p. 33). (5) decision ecb/2014/16 of 14 april 2014 concerning the establishment of an administrative board of review and its operating rules (oj l 175, 14.6.2014, p. 47). (6) directive 2013/36/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 26 june 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending directive 2002/87/ec and repealing directives 2006/48/ec and 2006/49/ec (oj l 176, 27.6.2013, p. 338). (7) commission delegated regulation (eu) 2015/61 of 10 october 2014 to supplement regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to liquidity coverage requirement for credit institutions (oj l 11, 17.1.2015, p. 1). (8) regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council of 26 june 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending regulation (eu) no 648/2012 (oj l 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1). (9) commission implementing decision 2014/908/eu of 12 december 2014 on the equivalence of the supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures according to regulation (eu) no 575/2013 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 359, 16.12.2014, p. 155). (10) regulation (eu) no 468/2014 of the european central bank of 16 april 2014 establishing the framework for cooperation within the single supervisory mechanism between the european central bank and national competent authorities and with national designated authorities (ssm framework regulation) (ecb/2014/17) (oj l 141, 14.5.2014, p. 1). (11) commission delegated regulation (eu) 2016/1675 of 14 july 2016 supplementing directive (eu) 2015/849 of the european parliament and of the council by identifying high-risk third countries with strategic deficiencies (oj l 254, 20.9.2016, p. 1).

name: council implementing decision (eu) 2019/309 of 18 february 2019 authorising lithuania to introduce a special measure derogating from article 193 of directive 2006/112/ec on the common system of value added tax type: decision_impl subject matter: taxation; europe; information technology and data processing; european union law date published: 2019-02-22 22.2.2019 en official journal of the european union l 51/17 council implementing decision (eu) 2019/309 of 18 february 2019 authorising lithuania to introduce a special measure derogating from article 193 of directive 2006/112/ec on the common system of value added tax the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to council directive 2006/112/ec of 28 november 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1), and in particular article 395(1) thereof, having regard to the proposal from the european commission, whereas: (1) article 193 of directive 2006/112/ec provides that the taxable person supplying the goods or services is, as a general rule, liable for the payment of value added tax (vat) to the tax authorities. (2) by letter registered with the commission on 16 october 2018, lithuania requested an authorisation to introduce a special measure derogating from article 193 of directive 2006/112/ec in order to apply the reverse charge mechanism to supplies of hard drives (the special measure). (3) in accordance with the second subparagraph of article 395(2) of directive 2006/112/ec, the commission informed the other member states of the request made by lithuania by letters dated 19 november 2018. by letter dated 20 november 2018, the commission notified lithuania that it had all the information necessary to consider the request. (4) lithuania discovered missing trader fraud in intra-community trade with respect to supplies of electronic goods such as laptops, mobile phones, tablets and hard drives. the scale and scope of this practice has a direct, very negative impact on the state budget. (5) lithuania has undertaken a number of measures to tackle and prevent this type of vat fraud. according to lithuania, those measures are not sufficient to prevent vat fraud in the supply of electronic goods. (6) lithuania intends to introduce the reverse charge mechanism to electronic products based on article 199a of directive 2006/112/ec. however, hard drives fall outside the scope of that article. (7) in order to provide for a more comprehensive form of the reverse charge mechanism that would apply not only to the electronic products already covered by article 199a of directive 2006/112/ec but also to hard drives, lithuania requests to be authorised to introduce the special measure. (8) given the possible positive impact of the special measure on the fight against vat fraud identified by lithuania, the derogation should be granted for a limited period, from 1 march 2019 until 28 february 2022. (9) derogations are in general authorised for a limited period, to allow an assessment of whether special measures are appropriate and effective. derogations grant member states time to introduce other conventional measures to tackle the specific problem until the expiry of special measures, thereby making an extension of the derogation redundant. derogations that allow making use of the reverse charge mechanism are only granted exceptionally for specific areas where fraud occurs and constitute a means of last resort. lithuania should therefore implement other conventional measures to fight and prevent the vat fraud with respect to trade in hard drives until the expiry of the special measure and consequently should no longer need to derogate from article 193 of directive 2006/112/ec with regard to such supplies. (10) the special measure will have no adverse impact on the union's own resources accruing from vat, has adopted this decision: article 1 by way of derogation from article 193 of directive 2006/112/ec, lithuania is authorised to designate the recipient as the person liable to pay vat in the case of supplies of hard drives. article 2 this decision shall take effect on the date of its notification. this decision shall apply from 1 march 2019 and shall expire on 28 february 2022. article 3 this decision is addressed to the republic of lithuania. done at brussels, 18 february 2019. for the council the president n. b d l u (1) oj l 347, 11.12.2006, p. 1.

name: council decision (eu, euratom) 2019/311 of 19 february 2019 appointing two members, proposed by the kingdom of denmark, of the european economic and social committee type: decision subject matter: eu institutions and european civil service; europe date published: 2019-02-22 22.2.2019 en official journal of the european union l 51/28 council decision (eu, euratom) 2019/311 of 19 february 2019 appointing two members, proposed by the kingdom of denmark, of the european economic and social committee the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 302 thereof, having regard to the treaty establishing the european atomic energy community, and in particular article 106a thereof, having regard to the proposal of the danish government, having regard to the opinion of the european commission, whereas: (1) on 18 september 2015 and 1 october 2015, the council adopted decisions (eu, euratom) 2015/1600 (1) and (eu, euratom) 2015/1790 (2) appointing the members of the european economic and social committee for the period from 21 september 2015 to 20 september 2020. on 16 february 2016, by council decision (eu) 2016/229 (3), ms marie-louise knuppert was replaced by mr arne grevsen as a member. (2) a member's seat on the european economic and social committee has become vacant following the end of the mandate of mr bernt fallenkamp. (3) a member's seat on the european economic and social committee has become vacant following the end of the mandate of mr arne grevsen, has adopted this decision: article 1 the following are hereby appointed as members of the european economic and social committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 september 2020: ms dorthe andersen, head of danish trade union eu office, ms bente sorgenfrey, 1. vice president fh - danish trade union confederation. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at brussels, 19 february 2019. for the council the president g. ciamba (1) council decision (eu, euratom) 2015/1600 of 18 september 2015 appointing the members of the european economic and social committee for the period from 21 september 2015 to 20 september 2020 (oj l 248, 24.9.2015, p. 53). (2) council decision (eu, euratom) 2015/1790 of 1 october 2015 appointing the members of the european economic and social committee for the period from 21 september 2015 to 20 september 2020 (oj l 260, 7.10.2015, p. 23). (3) council decision (eu) 2016/229 of 16 february 2016 appointing a member, proposed by the kingdom of denmark, of the european economic and social committee (oj l 41, 18.2.2016, p. 22).

name: council decision (cfsp) 2019/271 of 18 february 2019 amending decision (cfsp) 2016/1693 concerning restrictive measures against isil (da'esh) and al-qaeda and persons, groups, undertakings and entities associated with them type: decision subject matter: civil law; european construction; international affairs; politics and public safety date published: 2019-02-18 18.2.2019 en official journal of the european union li 46/3 council decision (cfsp) 2019/271 of 18 february 2019 amending decision (cfsp) 2016/1693 concerning restrictive measures against isil (da'esh) and al-qaeda and persons, groups, undertakings and entities associated with them the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on european union, and in particular article 29 thereof, having regard to the proposal of the high representative of the union for foreign affairs and security policy, whereas: (1) on 20 september 2016 the council adopted decision (cfsp) 2016/1693 (1). (2) in view of the continued threat posed by isil (da'esh) and al-qaeda and persons, groups, undertakings and entities associated with them, one person should be added to the list of persons, groups, undertakings and entities set out in the annex to decision (cfsp) 2016/1693. (3) decision (cfsp) 2016/1693 should be amended accordingly, has adopted this decision: article 1 the annex to decision (cfsp) 2016/1693 is amended as set out in the annex to this decision. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at brussels, 18 february 2019. for the council the president f. mogherini (1) council decision (cfsp) 2016/1693 of 20 september 2016 concerning restrictive measures against isil (da'esh) and al-qaeda and persons, groups, undertakings and entities associated with them and repealing common position 2002/402/cfsp (oj l 255, 21.9.2016, p. 25). annex the following person is added to the list set out in the annex to decision (cfsp) 2016/1693: 4. brahim el khayari; date of birth: 7 may 1992; place of birth: n mes (france); nationality: french.

name: council decision (eu) 2019/267 of 12 february 2019 on the conclusion of the status agreement between the european union and the republic of albania on actions carried out by the european border and coast guard agency in the republic of albania type: decision subject matter: international affairs; eu institutions and european civil service; europe; international law; migration; politics and public safety; european construction; cooperation policy date published: 2019-02-18 18.2.2019 en official journal of the european union l 46/1 council decision (eu) 2019/267 of 12 february 2019 on the conclusion of the status agreement between the european union and the republic of albania on actions carried out by the european border and coast guard agency in the republic of albania the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular points (b) and (d) of article 77(2) and point (c) of article 79(2), in conjunction with point (a)(v) of the second subparagraph of article 218(6), thereof, having regard to the proposal from the european commission, having regard to the consent of the european parliament (1), whereas: (1) in accordance with council decision (eu) 2018/1031 (2), the status agreement between the european union and the republic of albania on actions carried out by the european border and coast guard agency in the republic of albania (the agreement) was signed on 5 october 2018, subject to its conclusion. (2) as a result of the agreement, european border and coast guard teams can be swiftly deployed on albanian territory and respond to the current shift in migratory flows towards the coastal route and assist in external border management and fight against migrant smuggling. (3) this decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the schengen acquis in which the united kingdom does not take part, in accordance with council decision 2000/365/ec (3); the united kingdom is therefore not taking part in the adoption of this decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application. (4) this decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the schengen acquis in which ireland does not take part, in accordance with council decision 2002/192/ec (4); ireland is therefore not taking part in the adoption of this decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application. (5) in accordance with articles 1 and 2 of protocol no 22 on the position of denmark, annexed to the treaty on european union and to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application. given that this decision builds upon the schengen acquis, denmark shall, in accordance with article 4 of that protocol, decide within a period of six months after the council has decided on this decision whether it will implement it in its national law. (6) the agreement should be approved, has adopted this decision: article 1 the status agreement between the european union and the republic of albania on actions carried out by the european border and coast guard agency in the republic of albania (the agreement) is hereby approved on behalf of the union. the text of the agreement is attached to this decision. article 2 the president of the council shall, on behalf of the union, give the notification provided for in article 12(1) of the agreement. article 3 this decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption. done at brussels, 12 february 2019. for the council the president e.o. teodorovici (1) consent given on 15 january 2019 (not yet published in the official journal). (2) council decision (eu) 2018/1031 of 13 july 2018 on the signing, on behalf of the union, of the status agreement between the european union and the republic of albania on actions carried out by the european border and coast guard agency in the republic of albania (oj l 185, 23.7.2018, p. 6). (3) council decision 2000/365/ec of 29 may 2000 concerning the request of the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the schengen acquis (oj l 131, 1.6.2000, p. 43). (4) council decision 2002/192/ec of 28 february 2002 concerning ireland's request to take part in some of the provisions of the schengen acquis (oj l 64, 7.3.2002, p. 20).

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/252 of 11 february 2019 amending decision 2005/240/ec authorising methods for grading pig carcasses in poland (notified under document c(2019) 811) type: decision_impl subject matter: europe; animal product; agricultural structures and production; agricultural policy date published: 2019-02-13 13.2.2019 en official journal of the european union l 42/29 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/252 of 11 february 2019 amending decision 2005/240/ec authorising methods for grading pig carcasses in poland (notified under document c(2019) 811) (only the polish text is authentic) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to regulation (eu) no 1308/2013 of the european parliament and of the council of 17 december 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing council regulations (eec) no 922/72, (eec) no 234/79, (ec) no 1037/2001 and (ec) no 1234/2007 (1), and in particular article 20(p) and (t) thereof, whereas: (1) point 1 of section b.iv of annex iv to regulation (eu) no 1308/2013 provides that, for the classification of pig carcasses, the lean-meat content has to be assessed by means of grading methods authorised by the commission and only statistically proven assessment methods based on the physical measurement of one or more anatomical parts of the pig carcass may be authorised. the authorisation of grading methods should be subject to compliance with a maximum tolerance for statistical error in assessment. that tolerance is defined in part a of annex v to commission delegated regulation (eu) 2017/1182 (2). (2) by commission decision 2005/240/ec (3), the use of eight methods for grading pig carcasses was authorised in poland. by that decision poland was also authorised to provide for a presentation of pig carcasses with the flare fat, kidneys and/or diaphragm. (3) poland has requested the commission to authorise three new methods for grading pig carcasses in its territory and has presented a detailed description of the dissection trials, indicating the principles on which these methods are based, the results of its dissection trials and the equations used for assessing the percentage of lean meat in the protocol provided for in article 11(3) of delegated regulation (eu) 2017/1182. (4) examination of that request has revealed that the conditions for authorising the new grading methods are fulfilled. those grading methods should therefore be authorised in poland. (5) in accordance with article 20(t) of regulation (eu) no 1308/2013 poland has also requested to be authorised to provide for a presentation of pig carcasses different from the standard presentation defined in section b.iii of annex iv to that regulation. due to current normal commercial practices, pig carcasses are presented in poland with the flare fat, kidneys and/or diaphragm and without the external auditory canal. therefore, the recorded weight of the carcasses does not correspond to the weight for standard presentation. (6) examination of that request revealed that the conditions for authorising a different presentation of pig carcasses in poland are fulfilled. poland should therefore be authorised to provide for a presentation of pig carcasses with the flare fat, kidneys and/or diaphragm and without the external auditory canal. the weight recorded for the carcasses should be adjusted accordingly to the weight for standard presentation. (7) decision 2005/240/ec should therefore be amended accordingly. (8) modifications of the apparatus or grading methods should not be allowed, unless they are explicitly authorised by commission implementing decision. (9) the measures provided for in this decision are in accordance with the opinion of the committee for the common organisation of the agricultural markets, has adopted this decision: article 1 decision 2005/240/ec is amended as follows: (1) article 1 is replaced by the following: article 1 the use of the following methods is authorised for grading pig carcasses pursuant to point 1 of section b.iv of annex iv to regulation (eu) no 1308/2013 of the european parliament and of the council (*1) in poland: (a) the capteur gras/maigre sydel (cgm) apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in part 1 of the annex; (b) the ultra fom 300 apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in part 2 of the annex; (c) the fully automatic ultrasonic carcass grading (autofom) apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in part 3 of the annex; (d) the im-03 apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in part 4 of the annex; (e) the autofom iii apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in part 5 of the annex; (f) the csb image-meater (csb) apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in part 6 of the annex; (g) the fat-o-meater ii (fom ii) apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in part 7 of the annex; (h) the manual method (zp) and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in part 8 of the annex; (i) the gmscan apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in part 9 of the annex; (j) the estimeat apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in part 10 of the annex; (k) the meat3d apparatus and the assessment methods related thereto, details of which are given in part 11 of the annex. as regards the apparatus ultra fom 300 , referred to in point (b) of the first subparagraph, after the end of the measurement procedure it must be possible to verify on the carcass that the apparatus measured the values of measurement f1 and f2 on the site provided for in the annex, part 2, point 3. the corresponding marking of the measurement site must be made at the same time as the measurement procedure. the manual method zp, referred to in point (h) of the first subparagraph, shall only be authorised for abattoirs having a slaughter line with a capacity to process no more than 40 pigs per hour. (*1) regulation (eu) no 1308/2013 of the european parliament and of the council of 17 december 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing council regulations (eec) no 922/72, (eec) no 234/79, (ec) no 1037/2001 and (ec) no 1234/2007 (oj l 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671);" (2) article 2 is replaced by the following: article 2 notwithstanding the standard presentation referred to section b.iii of annex iv to regulation (eu) no 1308/2013, the flare fat, the kidneys and the diaphragm need not be removed from pig carcasses before being weighed and graded whereas the external auditory canal may be removed. in order to establish quotations for pig carcasses on a comparable basis, the recorded hot weight shall be: (a) reduced: (1) for diaphragm by 0,23 %; (2) for flare fat and kidneys by: 1,90 % for carcasses grade s and e, 2,11 % for carcasses grade u, 2,54 % for carcasses grade r, 3,12 % for carcasses grade o, 3,35 % for carcasses grade p; (b) increased by 260 grams per carcass for both external auditory canals.; (3) the annex is amended in accordance with the annex to this decision. article 2 this decision is addressed to the republic of poland. done at brussels, 11 february 2019. for the commission phil hogan member of the commission (1) oj l 347, 20.12.2013, p. 671. (2) commission delegated regulation (eu) 2017/1182 of 20 april 2017 supplementing regulation (eu) no 1308/2013 of the european parliament and of the council as regards the union scales for the classification of beef, pig and sheep carcasses and as regards the reporting of market prices of certain categories of carcasses and live animals (oj l 171, 4.7.2017, p. 74). (3) commission decision 2005/240/ec of 11 march 2005 authorising methods for grading pig carcases in poland (oj l 74, 19.3.2005, p. 62). annex in the annex to decision 2005/240/ec the following parts 9, 10 and 11 are added: part 9 gmscan 1. the rules provided for in this part shall apply when the grading of pig carcasses is carried out by means of the apparatus known as gmscan . 2. the gmscan uses magnetic induction to determine the dielectric properties of the carcasses without contact. the measurement system is formed by a number of transmitter coils that generate a variable and low intensity magnetic field. the receiver coils convert the signal from the perturbation of magnetic field caused by the carcass into a complex electric signal, related to the dielectric parameters of the muscle and fat tissue of the carcass. 3. the lean meat content of a carcass shall be calculated according to the following formula: = 44,589 0,190 cw + 2 341,210 (q1/cw) 936,097 (q2/cw) + 1 495,516 (q3/cw) where: = the estimated percentage of lean meat in a carcass; cw = warm carcass weight (in kilograms); q1, q2 and q3 = magnetic induction response (volts) from the ham, middle and shoulder area, respectively. this formula shall be valid for carcasses weighing between 60 and 120 kilograms (warm weight). part 10 estimeat 1. the rules provided for in this part shall apply when the grading of pig carcasses is carried out by means of the apparatus known as estimeat . 2. estimeat uses a depth camera to produce a three-dimensional picture of the carcass and to estimate carcass shape parameters. 130 cross sections are produced and for each cross section, the following parameters are determined in order to calculate the lean meat content: surface size, circuit, convexities. 3. the lean meat content of a carcass shall be calculated according to the following formula: = 38,39317497 + 508,24 x1 148,557 x2 3,63439 x3 + 2,481331 x4 + 8,353825 x5 + 2,75896 x6 + 268,8835 x7 where: = the estimated percentage of lean meat in a carcass; x1 = summary error of fitting points of cross section to circle with rsf radius at point p-66; x2 = outside convexity of carcass between maximum convexity of ham and shoulder at point z-80; x3 = summary error of fitting points of cross section to circle with r radius at point p-58/summary error of fitting points of cross section to circle with r radius at point p-67; x4 = summary error of fitting points of cross section to circle with rsf radius at point p-103/summary error of fitting points of cross section to circle with rsf radius at point p-111; x5 = cross section partial depth at point p-49 in 3/10 of the section width/cross section partial depth at point p-49 in 5/10 of the section width; x6 = cross section maximum depth at point p-18/cross section maximum depth at point p-49; x7 = partial error in points of cross section to circle with r radius at point p-72 in the 4/10 of the cross sectional area. this formula shall be valid for carcasses weighing between 60 and 120 kilograms (warm weight). part 11 meat3d 1. the rules provided for in this part shall apply when the grading of pig carcasses is carried out by means of the apparatus known as meat3d . 2. meat3d uses a scanner to produce a three-dimensional image of the carcass and to estimate carcass shape parameters. a specific frame is used for positioning the half carcass of pig during the scanning process. 130 cross sections are produced and for each cross section, the following parameters are determined in order to calculate the lean meat content: surface size, circuit, convexities. 3. the lean meat content of a carcass shall be calculated according to the following formula: = 50,36925112 + 0,543385 x1 9,06185 x2 10,83 x3 + 488,8033 x4 2,56922 x5 + 17,34226 x6 2,00088 x7 where: = the estimated percentage of lean meat in a carcass; x1 = summary error of fitting points of cross section to circle with rsf radius at point p-49/summary error of fitting points of cross section to circle with rsf radius at point p-23; x2 = summary error of fitting points of cross section to circle with r radius at point p-79/maximum value of carcass convexities in locations p_50 p99; x3 = the radius of curvature of cross section at point p-68/the radius of curvature of cross section at point p-51; x4 = partial error in points of cross section to circle with r radius at point p-70 in the 3/10 of the cross sectional area; x5 = summary error of fitting points of cross section to circle with rsf radius at point p-55/summary error of fitting points of cross section to circle with rsf radius at point p-71; x6 = cross section partial depth at point p-62 in 3/10 of the section width/cross section partial depth at point p-62 in 6/10 of the section width; x7 = cross section partial depth at point p-33 in 2/10 of the section width/maximum value of ham. this formula shall be valid for carcasses weighing between 60 and 120 kilograms (warm weight).

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/241 of 6 february 2019 amending decision 2007/703/ec and implementing decisions (eu) 2017/2452 and (eu) 2018/1109 as regards the representative of the authorisation holder (notified under document c(2019) 748) (text with eea relevance.) type: decision_impl subject matter: technology and technical regulations; foodstuff; marketing; health; agricultural activity; plant product date published: 2019-02-11 11.2.2019 en official journal of the european union l 39/14 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/241 of 6 february 2019 amending decision 2007/703/ec and implementing decisions (eu) 2017/2452 and (eu) 2018/1109 as regards the representative of the authorisation holder (notified under document c(2019) 748) (only the dutch, french and english texts are authentic) (text with eea relevance) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 of the european parliament and of the council of 22 september 2003 on genetically modified food and feed (1), and in particular to article 9(2) and article 21(2) thereof, whereas: (1) dow agrosciences ltd and dow agrosciences europe ltd, based in the united kingdom, are representatives in the union of respectively dow agrosciences llc and mycogen seeds for genetically modified food and feed covered by commission decision 2007/703/ec (2) and commission implementing decision (eu) 2017/2452 (3) and (eu) 2018/1109 (4). for the authorisations under those decisions, pioneer overseas corporation, based in belgium, is representative in the union of pioneer hi-bred international inc. (2) in the context of the withdrawal of the united kingdom from the european union, dow agrosciences europe requested the commission, by letter dated 13 september 2018, to change its representative for the genetically modified food and feed concerned, by having dow agrosciences distribution s.a.s., based in france, as representative, instead of dow agrosciences ltd and dow agrosciences europe ltd by letter dated 12 october 2018, dow agrosciences llc clarified that dow agrosciences europe, dow agrosciences ltd and dow agrosciences europe ltd, are the same legal entity. by letter dated 7 september 2018, dow agrosciences distribution s.a.s confirmed its agreement with the transfer of representative. (3) the requested changes are purely administrative in nature and therefore do not entail a new assessment of the products concerned. the same applies as regards the addressees of the authorisation decisions concerned, which should also be adapted accordingly. (4) decision 2007/703/ec and implementing decisions (eu) 2017/2452 and (eu) 2018/1109 should therefore be amended accordingly. (5) the measures provided for in this decision are in accordance with the opinion of the standing committee on plants, animals, food and feed, has adopted this decision: article 1 amendments to decision 2007/703/ec decision 2007/703/ec is amended as follows: (1) the text of point (b) of article 6(1) is replaced by the following: dow agrosciences distribution s.a.s., france, representing mycogen seeds, united states; (2) the text of point (b) of article 8 is replaced by the following: dow agrosciences distribution s.a.s., 6, rue jean pierre timbaud, 78180 montigny-le-bretonneux, france; (3) point (a) of the annex is amended as follows: (a) the name dow agrosciences europe ltd is replaced by the terms dow agrosciences distribution s.a.s.; (b) the address european development centre, 3 milton park, abingdon, oxon ox14 4rn, united kingdom is replaced by 6, rue jean pierre timbaud, 78180 montigny-le-bretonneux, france. article 2 amendments to implementing decision (eu) 2017/2452 implementing decision (eu) 2017/2452 is amended as follows: (1) the text of point (b) of article 7(1) is replaced by the following: dow agrosciences distribution s.a.s., france, representing dow agrosciences llc, united states; (2) the text of point (b) of article 9 is replaced by the following: dow agrosciences distribution s.a.s., 6, rue jean pierre timbaud, 78180 montigny-le-bretonneux, france; (3) point (a) of the annex is amended as follows: (a) the name dow agrosciences europe ltd is replaced by the terms dow agrosciences distribution s.a.s.; (b) the address european development center, 3b park square, milton park, abingdon, oxon ox14 4rn, united kingdom is replaced by 6, rue jean pierre timbaud, 78180 montigny-le-bretonneux, france. article 3 amendments to implementing decision (eu) 2018/1109 implementing decision (eu) 2018/1109 is amended as follows: (1) the text of point (b) of article 7(1) is replaced by the following: dow agrosciences distribution s.a.s., france, representing dow agrosciences llc, united states; (2) the text of point (b) of article 9 is replaced by the following: dow agrosciences distribution s.a.s., 6, rue jean pierre timbaud, 78180 montigny-le-bretonneux, france; (3) point (a) of the annex is amended as follows: (a) the name dow agrosciences europe ltd is replaced by dow agrosciences distribution s.a.s.; (b) the address european development center, 3b park square, milton park, abingdon, oxon ox14 4rn, united kingdom is replaced by 6, rue jean pierre timbaud, 78180 montigny-le-bretonneux, france. article 4 addressees this decision is addressed to: (a) dow agrosciences distribution s.a.s., 6, rue jean pierre timbaud, 78180 montigny-le-bretonneux, france; and (b) pioneer overseas corporation, avenue des arts 44, 1040 brussels, belgium. done at brussels, 6 february 2019. for the commission vytenis andriukaitis member of the commission (1) oj l 268, 18.10.2003, p. 1. (2) commission decision 2007/703/ec of 24 october 2007 authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize 1507xnk603 (das-157-1xmon-63-6) pursuant to regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 285, 31.10.2007, p. 47). (3) commission implementing decision (eu) 2017/2452 of 21 december 2017 renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize 1507 (das-157-1) pursuant to regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 346, 28.12.2017, p. 25). (4) commission implementing decision (eu) 2018/1109 of 3 august 2018 renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize 59122 (das-59122-7) pursuant to regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 203, 10.8.2018, p. 7).

name: council decision (eu) 2019/233 of 6 november 2018 on the position to be taken on behalf of the european union in the relevant committees of the united nations economic commission for europe as regards the proposals for modifications to un regulations nos 3, 4, 6, 7, 11, 14, 16, 17, 19, 23, 24, 27, 29, 34, 37, 38, 43, 44, 46, 48, 50, 53, 60, 67, 69, 70, 74, 77, 83, 86, 87, 91, 94, 95, 98, 99, 100, 101, 104, 105, 110, 112, 113, 119, 121, 123, 128, 129, 132 and 137 and to un global technical regulation no 9, and as regards the proposals for three new un regulations type: decision subject matter: organisation of transport; technology and technical regulations; united nations; land transport; environmental policy date published: 2019-02-08 8.2.2019 en official journal of the european union l 37/120 council decision (eu) 2019/233 of 6 november 2018 on the position to be taken on behalf of the european union in the relevant committees of the united nations economic commission for europe as regards the proposals for modifications to un regulations nos 3, 4, 6, 7, 11, 14, 16, 17, 19, 23, 24, 27, 29, 34, 37, 38, 43, 44, 46, 48, 50, 53, 60, 67, 69, 70, 74, 77, 83, 86, 87, 91, 94, 95, 98, 99, 100, 101, 104, 105, 110, 112, 113, 119, 121, 123, 128, 129, 132 and 137 and to un global technical regulation no 9, and as regards the proposals for three new un regulations the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 114, in conjunction with article 218(9) thereof, having regard to the proposal from the european commission, whereas: (1) by council decision 97/836/ec (1), the union acceded to the agreement of the united nations economic commission for europe (unece) concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted to and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of those prescriptions (the revised 1958 agreement). (2) by council decision 2000/125/ec (2), the union acceded to the agreement concerning the establishing of global technical regulations for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles (the parallel agreement). (3) directive 2007/46/ec of the european parliament and of the council (3) replaced the approval systems of the member states with a union approval procedure and established a harmonised framework containing administrative provisions and general technical requirements for all new vehicles, systems, components and separate technical units. that directive incorporated regulations adopted under the revised 1958 agreement (un regulations) in the eu type-approval system, either as requirements for type-approval or as alternatives to union legislation. since the adoption of directive 2007/46/ec, un regulations have been increasingly incorporated into union legislation. (4) in the light of experience and technical developments, the requirements relating to certain elements or features covered by un regulations nos 3, 4, 6, 7, 11, 14, 16, 17, 19, 23, 24, 27, 29, 34, 37, 38, 43, 44, 46, 48, 50, 53, 60, 67, 69, 70, 74, 77, 83, 86, 87, 91, 94, 95, 98, 99, 100, 101, 104, 105, 110, 112, 113, 119, 121, 123, 128, 129, 132 and 137, as well as by un global technical regulation 9 need to be modified. (5) in order to clarify and consolidate the component-related requirements currently contained in several un regulations, three new un regulations on light-signalling devices (lsd), road illumination devices (rid) and retro-reflective devices (rrd) need to be adopted. they will replace and repeal un regulations nos 3, 4, 6, 7, 19, 23, 27, 38, 50, 69, 70, 77, 87, 91, 98, 104, 112, 113, 119 and 123 without changing any of the detailed technical requirements already in force to date. (6) it is appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the union's behalf in the administrative committee of the revised 1958 agreement and in the executive committee of the parallel agreement as regards the adoption of those modifications and those new un regulations, as the regulations will be binding on the union and capable of decisively influencing the content of union law in the field of vehicle type-approval. (7) in those committees, the union is to be represented by the commission in accordance with article 17(1) of the treaty on european union, has adopted this decision: article 1 the position to be taken on the union's behalf in the administrative committee of the revised 1958 agreement and the executive committee of the parallel agreement during the period from 12 to 16 november 2018 shall be to vote in favour of the proposals listed in the annex to this decision. article 2 this decision is addressed to the commission. done at brussels, 6 november 2018. for the council the president h. l ger (1) council decision 97/836/ec of 27 november 1997 with a view to accession by the european community to the agreement of the united nations economic commission for europe concerning the adoption of uniform technical prescriptions for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted to and/or be used on wheeled vehicles and the conditions for reciprocal recognition of approvals granted on the basis of these prescriptions (revised 1958 agreement) (oj l 346, 17.12.1997, p. 78). (2) council decision 2000/125/ec of 31 january 2000 concerning the conclusion of the agreement concerning the establishing of global technical regulations for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles (parallel agreement) (oj l 35, 10.2.2000, p. 12). (3) directive 2007/46/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 5 september 2007 establishing a framework for the approval of motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate technical units intended for such vehicles (framework directive) (oj l 263, 9.10.2007, p. 1). annex regulation no agenda item title document reference (1) 3 proposal for the 03 series of amendments to un regulation no 3 (retro-reflecting devices) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/91 4 proposal for the 01 series of amendments to un regulation no 4 (illumination of rear registration plates) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/92 6 proposal for the 02 series of amendments to un regulation no 6 (direction indicators) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/93 7 proposal for the 03 series of amendments to un regulation no 7 (position, stop and end-outline lamps) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/94 11 proposal for supplement 2 to the 04 series of amendments to un regulation no 11 (door latches and hinges) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/127 11 proposal for corrigendum 1 to the 04 series of amendments to un regulation no 11 (door latches and hinges) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/155 14 proposal for corrigendum 2 to revision 5 to un regulation no 14 (safety-belt anchorages) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/156 16 proposal for supplement 11 to the 06 series of amendments to un regulation no 16 (safety-belts) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/128 16 proposal for supplement 4 to the 07 series of amendments to un regulation no 16 (safety-belts) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/129 16 proposal for the 08 series of amendments to un regulation no 16 (safety-belts) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/141 17 proposal for the 09 series of amendments to un regulation no 17 (strength of seats) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/142 19 proposal for the 05 series of amendments to un regulation no 19 (front fog lamps) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/95 23 proposal for the 01 series of amendments to un regulation no 23 (reversing lamps) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/96 24 proposal for supplement 4 to the 03 series of amendments to un regulation no 24 (visible pollutants, measurement of power of compression ignition engine (diesel smoke)) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/143 27 proposal for the 05 series of amendments to un regulation no 27 (advance warning triangles) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/97 29 proposal for supplement 4 to the 03 series of amendments to un regulation no 29 (cabs of commercial vehicles) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/130 34 proposal for supplement 6 to the 02 series of amendments to un regulation no 34 (prevention of fire risks) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/120 34 proposal for supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to un regulation no 34 (prevention of fire risks) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/121 37 proposal for supplement 47 to the 03 series of amendments to un regulation no 37 (filament light sources) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/83 38 proposal for the 01 series of amendments to un regulation no 38 (rear fog lamps) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/98 43 proposal for supplement 8 to the 01 series of amendments to un regulation no 43 (safety glazing) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/122 44 proposal supplement 15 to the 04 series of amendments to un regulation no 44 (child restraint systems) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/131 46 proposal for supplement 6 to the 04 series of amendments to un regulation no 46 (devices for indirect vision) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/123 48 proposal for supplement 11 to the 06 series of amendments to un regulation no 48 (installation of lighting and light-signalling devices) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/84 48 proposal for supplement 12 to the 05 series of amendments to un regulation no 48 (installation of lighting and light-signalling devices) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/85 48 proposal for supplement 11 to the 06 series of amendments to un regulation no 48 (installation of lighting and light-signalling devices) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/99/rev.1 48 proposal for supplement 12 to the 05 series of amendments to un regulation no 48 (installation of lighting and light-signalling devices) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/100 48 proposal for supplement 18 to the 04 series of amendments to un regulation no 48 (installation of lighting and light-signalling devices) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/101 48 proposal for supplement 6 to the 03 series of amendments to un regulation no 48 (installation of lighting and light-signalling devices) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/102 50 proposal for the 01 series of amendments to un regulation no 50 (position, stop, direction indicator lamps for mopeds and motorcycles) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/103 53 proposal for supplement 2 to the 02 series of amendments to un regulation no 53 (installation of lighting and light-signalling devices for l3 vehicles) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/86 53 proposal for supplement 20 to the 01 series of amendments to un regulation no 53 (installation of lighting and light-signalling devices for l3 vehicles) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/87 53 proposal for supplement 2 to the 02 series of amendments to un regulation no 53 (installation of lighting and light-signalling devices for l3 vehicles) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/104/rev.1 53 proposal for supplement 20 to the 01 series of amendments to un regulation no 53 (installation of lighting and light-signalling devices for l3 vehicles) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/105 60 proposal for corrigendum 1 to revision 1 to un regulation no 60 (driver operated controls for mopeds/motorcycles) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/152 67 proposal for the 02 series of amendments to un regulation no 67 (lpg vehicles) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/124 69 proposal for the 02 series of amendments to un regulation no 69 (rear-marking plates for slow moving vehicles) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/106 70 proposal for the 02 series of amendments to un regulation no 70 (rear-marking plates for heavy and long vehicles) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/107 74 proposal for supplement 10 to the 01 series of amendments to un regulation no 74 (installation of lighting and light-signalling devices for mopeds) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/88 74 proposal for supplement 10 to the 01 series of amendments to un regulation no 74 (installation of lighting and light-signalling devices for mopeds) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/108/rev.1 77 proposal for the 01 series of amendments to un regulation no 77 (parking lamps) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/109 83 proposal for supplement 2 to the 03 series of amendments to un regulation no 83 (emissions of m1 and n1 vehicles) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/144 83 proposal for supplement 1 to the 04 series of amendments to un regulation no 83 (emissions of m1 and n1 vehicles) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/145 83 proposal for supplement 12 to the 05 series of amendments to un regulation no 83 (emissions of m1 and n1 vehicles) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/146 83 proposal for supplement 12 to the 06 series of amendments to un regulation no 83 (emissions of m1 and n1 vehicles) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/147 83 proposal for supplement 18 to the 07 series of amendments to un regulation no 83 (emissions of m1 and n1 vehicles) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/148 86 proposal for supplement 1 to the 01 series of amendments to un regulation no 86 (installation of lighting and light-signalling devices for agricultural vehicles) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/110/rev.1 86 proposal for supplement 7 to un regulation no 86 (installation of lighting and light-signalling devices for agricultural vehicles) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/111 87 proposal for the 01 series of amendments to un regulation no 87 (daytime running lamps) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/112 91 proposal for the 01 series of amendments to un regulation no 91 (side marker lamps) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/113 94 proposal supplement 1 to the 03 series of amendments to un regulation no 94 (frontal collision) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/132 95 proposal for supplement 7 to the 03 series of amendments to un regulation no 95 (lateral collision) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/133 98 proposal for the 02 series of amendments to un regulation no 98 (headlamps with gas-discharge light sources) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/114 99 proposal for supplement 14 to the 03 series of amendments to un regulation no 99 (gas-discharge light sources) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/89 100 proposal for supplement 5 to the 01 series of amendments to un regulation no 100 (electric power trained vehicles) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/134 + wp.29-176-03 100 proposal for supplement 4 to the 02 series of amendments to un regulation no 100 (electric power trained vehicles) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/135 101 proposal for supplement 10 to un regulation no 101 (co2 emission/fuel consumption) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/149 101 proposal for supplement 8 to 01 series of amendments to un regulation no 101 (co2 emission/fuel consumption) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/150 104 proposal for the 01 series of amendments to un regulation no 104 (retro-reflective markings) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/115 105 proposal for supplement 1 to the 06 series of amendments to un regulation no 105 (adr vehicles) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/126 110 proposal for supplement 1 to the 03 series of amendments to un regulation no 110 (cng and lng vehicles) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/125 110 proposal for corrigendum 1 to revision 3 to un regulation no 110 (cng and lng vehicles) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/153 112 proposal for the 02 series of amendments to un regulation no 112 (headlamps emitting an asymmetrical passing-beam) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/116 113 proposal for the 03 series of amendments to un regulation no 113 (headlamps emitting a symmetrical passing-beam) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/117 119 proposal for the 02 series of amendments to un regulation no 119 (cornering lamps) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/118 121 proposal for corrigendum 1 to revision 2 to un regulation no 121 (identification of controls, tell-tales and indicators) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/154 123 proposal for the 02 series of amendments to un regulation no 123 (adaptive front lighting systems (afs)) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/119 128 proposal for supplement 8 to the original version of un regulation no 128 (led light sources) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/90 129 proposal for supplement 8 to un regulation no 129 (enhanced child restraint systems) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/136 129 proposal for supplement 5 to the 01 series of amendments to un regulation no 129 (enhanced child restraint systems) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/137 129 proposal for supplement 4 to the 02 series of amendments to un regulation no 129 (enhanced child restraint systems) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/138 129 proposal for supplement 1 to the 03 series of amendments to un regulation no 129 (enhanced child restraint systems) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/139 132 proposal for supplement 1 to 01 series of amendments to un regulation no 132 (retrofit emissions control devices (rec)) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/151 137 proposal for supplement 2 to the 01 series of amendments to un regulation no 137. (frontal impact with focus on restraint systems) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/140 new un reg proposal for a new un regulation on light-signalling devices (lsd) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/157 new un reg proposal for a new un regulation on road illumination devices (rid) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/158 new un reg proposal for a new un regulation on retro-reflective devices (rrd) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/159 gtr no agenda item title document reference un gtr 9 proposal for amendment 2 to un gtr no 9 (pedestrian safety) ece/trans/wp.29/2018/160 & 161 (1) all documents referenced in the table are publicly available at: http://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/wp29wgs/wp29gen/gen2018.html

name: commission decision (eu) 2019/165 of 1 february 2019 laying down internal rules concerning the provision of information to data subjects and the restriction of certain of their data protection rights by the commission in the context of administrative inquiries, pre-disciplinary, disciplinary and suspension proceedings type: decision subject matter: information technology and data processing; eu institutions and european civil service; executive power and public service; rights and freedoms date published: 2019-02-04 4.2.2019 en official journal of the european union l 32/9 commission decision (eu) 2019/165 of 1 february 2019 laying down internal rules concerning the provision of information to data subjects and the restriction of certain of their data protection rights by the commission in the context of administrative inquiries, pre-disciplinary, disciplinary and suspension proceedings the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 249(1), thereof, whereas: (1) the commission conducts administrative inquiries, pre-disciplinary, disciplinary and suspension proceedings, on the basis of article 86 of the staff regulations of officials of the european union (1) and in accordance with annex ix thereto as well as commission decision c(2004) 1588 (2). those tasks are mainly the responsibility of the investigation and disciplinary office of the commission (idoc), which is a directorate attached to the directorate-general for human resources and security. disciplinary proceedings may include investigations conducted by the disciplinary board of the commission pursuant to article 17 of annex ix to the staff regulations. (2) in the context of these activities, the relevant commission services collect and process relevant information. that information includes personal data, in particular identification, contact and behavioural data. the relevant commission services transmit personal data to other commission services on a need to know basis. (3) the personal data are stored in a secured physical and electronic environment, to prevent unlawful access or transfer of data to persons who do not have a need to know. after the end of the processing, the data are retained in accordance with the applicable commission rules (3). (4) while carrying out its tasks, the commission is bound to respect the rights of natural persons in relation to the processing of personal data recognised by article 8(1) of the charter of fundamental rights of the european union and by article 16(1) of the treaty, as well as the rights provided for in regulation (eu) 2018/1725 of the european parliament and of the council (4), which replaced regulation (ec) no 45/2001 of the european parliament and of the council (5). at the same time, the commission is required to comply with strict rules of confidentiality and professional secrecy and to ensure respect for the procedural rights of persons concerned and witnesses, in particular the presumption of innocence of the person concerned. (5) in certain circumstances it is necessary to reconcile the rights of data subjects pursuant to regulation (eu) 2018/1725 with the need for effectiveness of administrative inquiries and pre-disciplinary, disciplinary and suspension proceedings, as well as with full respect for fundamental rights and freedoms of other data subjects. to that effect, article 25(1)(c), (g) and (h) of regulation (eu) 2018/1725 provides the commission with the possibility to restrict the application of articles 14 to 17, 19, 20 and 35, as well as the principle of transparency laid down in article 4(1)(a), insofar as its provisions correspond to the rights and obligations provided for in articles 14 to 17, 19, 20 and 35 of that regulation. (6) this might, in particular, be the case as regards the provision of information about the processing of personal data to the person concerned at the start of an administrative inquiry. the provision of such information might affect the commission's capacity to conduct the administrative inquiry, for example because the person concerned could destroy evidence before it is examined by the commission or interfere with potential witnesses before they are themselves heard. similarly, providing access to personal data during phases of the procedure in which the person concerned does not have access to the file, such as during the preliminary assessment or the administrative inquiry, might reveal information that could adversely affect the conduct of the administrative inquiry. in both cases, restricting the rights of the person concerned might be necessary to safeguard a monitoring, inspection or regulatory function connected to the exercise of official authority in a case where an important objective of general public interest of the union is at stake, namely ensuring that the staff of the commission abide by their statutory obligations and behave in an ethical manner. (7) it might also be necessary to restrict the right of access to personal data by the person concerned when such access would reveal information about a witness or a whistle-blower who has asked not to have their identity disclosed. in such a case, the commission may decide to restrict access to the statement relating to the person concerned in order to protect the rights and freedoms of this witness or whistle-blower. (8) in order to ensure the confidentiality and effectiveness of administrative inquiries, pre-disciplinary, disciplinary and suspension proceedings, while respecting the standards of protection of personal data under regulation (eu) 2018/1725, it is necessary to adopt internal rules under which the commission may restrict data subjects' rights in line with article 25(1)(c),(g) and (h) of regulation (eu) 2018/1725. (9) the internal rules should apply to all processing operations carried out by the commission in the performance of its tasks, including processing operations carried out prior to the opening of an administrative inquiry and during assistance and cooperation provided by the commission to national authorities and international organisations outside of its activities. (10) in order to comply with articles 14, 15 and 16 of regulation (eu) 2018/1725, the commission should inform all individuals of its activities involving processing of their personal data and of their rights, in a transparent and coherent manner, by means of data protection notices published on the commission's website. in addition, the commission should individually inform, in an appropriate format, the data subjects involved in an administrative inquiry or in pre-disciplinary, disciplinary or suspension proceedings. (11) in addition, in order to maintain effective cooperation it may be necessary for the commission to restrict the application of data subjects' rights in order to protect processing operations of other union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies or of member states' and third countries' authorities and international organisations. to that effect, the commission should consult those institutions, bodies, offices, agencies, authorities and international organisations on the relevant grounds for imposing restrictions and on the necessity and proportionality of the restrictions, unless this would jeopardise the commission's activities. (12) the commission may also have to restrict the provision of information to data subjects and the application of other rights of data subjects in relation to personal data received from third countries or international organisations, in order to fulfil its duty of cooperation with those countries or organisations and thus safeguard an important objective of general public interest of the union. however, in some circumstances the interest or fundamental rights of the data subject may override the interest of international cooperation. (13) the commission should handle all restrictions in a transparent manner and register each application of restrictions in the corresponding record system. (14) pursuant to article 25(8) of regulation (eu) 2018/1725, controllers may defer, omit or deny the provision of information on the reasons for the application of a restriction to the data subject if providing that information would in any way compromise the purpose of the restriction. this is, in particular, the case of restrictions to the rights provided for in articles 16 and 35 of regulation (eu) 2018/1725. (15) the commission should regularly review the restrictions imposed in order to ensure that the data subject's rights to be informed in accordance with articles 16 and 35 of regulation (eu) 2018/1725 are restricted only as long as such restrictions are necessary to allow the commission to conduct its administrative inquiries, pre-disciplinary, disciplinary and suspension proceedings. (16) where other rights of data subjects are restricted, the controller should assess on a case-by-case basis whether the communication of the restriction would compromise its purpose. (17) the data protection officer of the european commission should carry out an independent review of the application of restrictions, with a view to ensuring compliance with this decision. (18) the european data protection supervisor delivered an opinion on 5 december 2018, has adopted this decision: article 1 subject matter and scope 1. this decision lays down the rules to be followed by the commission to inform data subjects of the processing of their data in accordance with articles 14, 15 and 16 of regulation (eu) 2018/1725 when conducting administrative inquiries, pre-disciplinary, disciplinary and suspension proceedings. 2. it also lays down the conditions under which the commission may restrict the application of articles 4(1)(a), 14 to 17, 19, 20 and 35 of regulation (eu) 2018/1725, in accordance with article 25 (1) (c), (g) and (h) thereof. 3. this decision applies to the processing of personal data by the commission pursuant to article 86 of the staff regulations and annex ix thereof, as well as decision c (2004) 1588. 4. this decision applies to the processing of personal data by the commission insofar as it processes personal data for purposes related to administrative inquiries, pre-disciplinary, disciplinary and suspension proceedings. 5. the categories of personal data covered by this decision include identification, contact and behavioural data. article 2 applicable exceptions and restrictions 1. where the commission exercises its duties with respect to data subjects' rights under regulation (eu) 2018/1725, it shall consider whether any of the exceptions laid down in that regulation apply. 2. subject to articles 3 to 7 of this decision, the commission may restrict the application of articles 14 to 17, 19, 20 and 35 of regulation (eu) 2018/1725, as well as the principle of transparency laid down in article 4(1)(a) of that regulation insofar as its provisions correspond to the rights and obligations provided for in articles 14 to 17, 19, 20 and 35 of that regulation, where the exercise of those rights and obligations would jeopardise the purpose of administrative inquiries, pre-disciplinary, disciplinary and suspension proceedings or would adversely affect the rights and freedoms of other data subjects. 3. subject to articles 3 to 7, the commission may restrict the rights and obligations referred to in paragraph 2 of this article in relation to personal data obtained from other union institutions, bodies, agencies and offices, competent authorities of member states or third countries or from international organisations, in the following circumstances: (a) where the exercise of those rights and obligations could be restricted by other union institutions, bodies, agencies and offices on the basis of other acts provided for in article 25 of regulation (eu) 2018/1725 or in accordance with chapter ix of that regulation or in accordance with regulation (eu) 2016/794 of the european parliament and of the council (6) or council regulation (eu) 2017/1939 (7); (b) where the exercise of those rights and obligations could be restricted by competent authorities of member states on the basis of acts referred to in article 23 of regulation (eu) 2016/679 of the european parliament and of the council (8), or under national measures transposing articles 13(3), 15(3) or 16(3) of directive (eu) 2016/680 of the european parliament and of the council (9); (c) where the exercise of those rights and obligations could jeopardise the commission's cooperation with third countries or international organisations in the conduct of administrative inquiries, pre-disciplinary, disciplinary and suspension proceedings. before applying restrictions in the circumstances referred to in points (a) and (b) of the first subparagraph, the commission shall consult the relevant union institutions, bodies, agencies, offices or competent authorities of the member states, unless it is clear to the commission that the application of a restriction is provided for by one of the acts referred to in those points or such consultation would jeopardise the commission's activities. point (c) of the first subparagraph shall not apply where the interest of the commission to cooperate with third countries or international organisations is overridden by the interests or fundamental rights and freedom of the data subjects. article 3 provision of information to data subjects 1. the commission shall publish on its website data protection notices that inform all data subjects of its activities involving processing of their personal data. 2. the commission shall individually inform, in an appropriate format, the person concerned by an administrative inquiry, pre-disciplinary, disciplinary or suspension proceedings, as well as witnesses requested to provide information in relation to those proceedings, about the processing of their personal data. 3. where the commission restricts in accordance with article 2 of this decision, wholly or partly, the provision of the information referred to in paragraph 2, it shall record and register the reasons for the restriction in accordance with article 6. article 4 right of access by data subjects, right of erasure and right to restriction of processing 1. where the commission restricts, wholly or partly, the right of access to personal data by data subjects, the right of erasure, or the right to restriction of processing as referred to in articles 17, 19 and 20 respectively of regulation (eu) 2018/1725, it shall inform the data subject concerned, in its reply to the request for access, erasure or restriction of processing, of the restriction applied and of the principal reasons therefor, and of the possibility of lodging a complaint with the european data protection supervisor or of seeking a judicial remedy in the court of justice of the european union. 2. the provision of information concerning the reasons for the restriction referred to in paragraph 1 may be deferred, omitted or denied for as long as it would undermine the purpose of the restriction. 3. the commission shall record the reasons for the restriction in accordance with article 6 of this decision. 4. where the right of access is wholly or partly restricted, the data subject may exercise his or her right of access through the intermediary of the european data protection supervisor, in accordance with article 25 (6), (7) and (8) of regulation (eu) 2018/1725. article 5 communication of personal data breaches to data subjects where the commission restricts the communication of a personal data breach to the data subject, as referred to in article 35 of regulation (eu) 2018/1725, it shall record and register the reasons for the restriction in accordance with article 6 of this decision. article 6 recording and registering of restrictions 1. the commission shall record the reasons for any restriction applied pursuant to this decision, including a case-by-case assessment of the necessity and proportionality of the restriction. to that end, the record shall state how the exercise of the right would jeopardise the purpose of the administrative inquiry, pre-disciplinary, disciplinary or suspension proceedings, or of restrictions applied pursuant to article 2(2) or (3), or would adversely affect the rights and freedoms of other data subjects. 2. the record and, where applicable, the documents containing the underlying factual and legal elements shall be registered. they shall be made available to the european data protection supervisor on request. article 7 duration of restrictions 1. restrictions referred to in articles 3, 4 and 5 shall continue to apply as long as the reasons justifying them remain applicable. 2. where the reasons for a restriction referred to in articles 3 and 5 no longer apply, the commission shall lift the restriction and provide the principal reasons for the restriction to the data subject. at the same time, the commission shall inform the data subject of the possibility of lodging a complaint with the european data protection supervisor at any time or of seeking a judicial remedy in the court of justice of the european union. 3. the commission shall review the application of the restrictions referred to in articles 3 and 5 every six months from their adoption and in any case at the end of the administrative inquiry, pre-disciplinary, disciplinary or suspension proceedings. thereafter, the commission shall monitor the need to maintain any deferral on an annual basis. article 8 review by the data protection officer of the european commission 1. the data protection officer of the european commission shall be informed, without undue delay, whenever data subjects' rights are restricted in accordance with this decision. upon request, the data protection officer shall be provided with access to the record and any documents containing underlying factual and legal elements. 2. the data protection officer may request a review of the restriction. the data protection officer shall be informed in writing of the outcome of the requested review. article 9 entry into force this decision shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at brussels, 1 february 2019. for the commission the president jean-claude juncker (1) regulation (eec, euratom, ecsc) no 259/68 of the council of 29 february 1968 laying down the staff regulations and the conditions of employment of other servants of the european communities and instituting special measures temporarily applicable to officials of the commission (oj l 56, 4.3.1968, p. 1). (2) commission decision c(2004) 1588 laying down general implementing provisions on the conduct of administrative inquiries and disciplinary procedures. (3) common commission-level retention list for european commission files sec(2012)713 (4) regulation (eu) 2018/1725 of the european parliament and of the council of 23 october 2018 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by the union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies and on the free movement of such data, and repealing regulation (ec) no 45/2001 and decision no 1247/2002/ec (oj l 295, 21.11.2018, p. 39). (5) regulation (ec) no 45/2001 of the european parliament and of the council of 18 december 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (oj l 8, 12.1.2001, p. 1). (6) regulation (eu) 2016/794 of the european parliament and of the council of 11 may 2016 on the european union agency for law enforcement cooperation (europol) and replacing and repealing council decisions 2009/371/jha, 2009/934/jha, 2009/935/jha, 2009/936/jha and 2009/968/jha (oj l 135, 24.5.2016, p. 53). (7) council regulation (eu) 2017/1939 of 12 october 2017 implementing enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the european public prosecutor's office (the eppo) (oj l 283, 31.10.2017, p. 1). (8) regulation (eu) 2016/679 of the european parliament and of the council of 27 april 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing directive 95/46/ec (general data protection regulation) (oj l 119, 4.5.2016, p. 1). (9) directive (eu) 2016/680 of the european parliament and of the council of 27 april 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing council framework decision 2008/977/jha (oj l 119, 4.5.2016, p. 89).

name: decision (eu) 2019/166 of the european central bank of 25 january 2019 on the market infrastructure board and repealing decision ecb/2012/6 on the establishment of the target2-securities board (ecb/2019/3) type: decision subject matter: free movement of capital; eu institutions and european civil service; monetary economics date published: 2019-02-04 4.2.2019 en official journal of the european union l 32/14 decision (eu) 2019/166 of the european central bank of 25 january 2019 on the market infrastructure board and repealing decision ecb/2012/6 on the establishment of the target2-securities board (ecb/2019/3) the governing council of the european central bank, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to the statute of the european system of central banks and of the european central bank, and in particular article 12.3 thereof, having regard to guideline ecb/2012/13 of 18 july 2012 on target2-securities (1), whereas: (1) the eurosystem offers market infrastructures, platforms, applications and related services in the fields of cash settlement, securities settlement and collateral management, comprising target services which include target2, t2s and tips services. (2) on 16 march 2016, the governing council approved the establishment of the market infrastructure board, the governance body responsible for technical and operational management tasks in the field of market infrastructure and platforms. (3) in the past, the market infrastructure board has met in different dedicated formats in accordance with the different market infrastructures, platforms and projects for which it is responsible. since the establishment of the market infrastructure board, the t2s board, originally established by virtue of decision ecb/2012/6 (2), has been operating as one of such dedicated formats of the market infrastructure board, as reflected in decision (eu) 2017/1403 of the european central bank (ecb/2017/20) (3). (4) the t2s board was not solely established by decision ecb/2012/6 but is also based on a t2s protocol signed by the eurosystem central banks. (5) a review of the operation of the market infrastructure board has shown that no dedicated formats are necessary for its efficient functioning. therefore, decision ecb/2012/6 should be repealed and the format of the market infrastructure board should be revised so that the market infrastructure board is structured and functions in accordance with this decision. (6) the market infrastructure board in its revised format shall support the governing council in ensuring that the eurosystem's market infrastructures, platforms, applications and related services in the fields of cash settlement, securities settlement and collateral management are maintained and further developed, as well as that projects in the above fields are developed, in line with the treaty objectives of the european system of central banks (escb), the escb's business needs, technological advances, as well as regulatory and oversight requirements, as applicable from time to time. (7) it is understood that the legal effect of annex iii to this decision (code of conduct) is conditional on the mib members' signature of the declarations in appendices 1 and 2 to annex iii, has adopted this decision: article 1 definitions all references to the t2s board in guideline ecb/2012/13, decisions ecb/2011/20 (4) and ecb/2011/05 (5) shall be read as references to the market infrastructure board. all other terms used in this decision shall have the same meaning as in guidelines ecb/2012/27 (6), and ecb/2012/13. article 2 market infrastructure board 1. the mandate of the market infrastructure board (mib), including its objectives, responsibilities and tasks are set out in annex i to this decision. 2. the rules of procedure of the mib, including its composition and working procedures, are set out in annex ii to this decision. 3. the code of conduct for the members of the mib, set out in annex iii to this decision is endorsed by the governing council. 4. the procedures and requirements for the selection, appointment and replacement of the non-central bank members of the mib are set out in annex iv to this decision. 5. it is understood that this decision establishes no presumption to the effect that every new market infrastructures project falling within the scope of this decision's definition of eurosystem infrastructure project is to automatically be entrusted to the mib. only those projects explicitly entrusted by the governing council to the mib are to be managed by the mib. article 3 repeal decision ecb/2012/6 is repealed. article 4 transitional provisions in order to ensure a smooth and orderly transition to the mib, established in accordance with this decision, including the appointment of its members, the term of office of incumbent mib members, at the time of the entry into force of this decision, is deemed to be extended by four months. article 5 final provisions this decision shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at frankfurt am main, 25 january 2019. the president of the ecb mario draghi (1) oj l 215, 11.8.2012, p. 19. (2) decision ecb/2012/6 of 29 march 2012 on the establishment of the target2-securities board and repealing decision ecb/2009/6 (oj l 117, 1.5.2012, p. 13). (3) decision (eu) 2017/1403 of the european central bank of 23 june 2017 amending decision ecb/2012/6 on the establishment of the target2-securities board (ecb/2017/20) (oj l 199, 29.7.2017, p. 24). (4) decision ecb/2011/20 of 16 november 2011 establishing detailed rules and procedures for implementing the eligibility criteria for central securities depositories to access target2-securities services (oj l 319, 2.12.2011, p. 117). (5) decision ecb/2011/5 of 20 april 2011 on the selection of target2-securities network service providers (oj l 134, 21.5.2011, p. 22). (6) guideline ecb/2012/27 of 5 december 2012 on a trans-european automated real-time gross settlement express transfer system (target2) (oj l 30, 30.1.2013, p. 1). annex i market infrastructure board mandate introduction the eurosystem offers market infrastructures, platforms, applications and related services in the fields of cash settlement, securities settlement and collateral management, comprising target services which include target2, t2s and tips services as well as, in the future, ecms (the eurosystem infrastructure services). the market infrastructure board (mib) is the governance body that supports the governing council (the governing council) of the european central bank (ecb) in ensuring that the eurosystem infrastructure services are maintained and further developed, as well as that projects concerning eurosystem infrastructure services (the eurosystem infrastructure projects or projects) are managed, in line with the treaty objectives of the european system of central banks (escb), the business needs, technological advances, the legal framework applicable to eurosystem infrastructure services and projects, as well as regulatory and oversight requirements, in full respect of the mandates of the escb committees established under article 9 of the ecb rules of procedure. the mib reports to the ecb decision-making bodies. this decision establishes no presumption to the effect that every new market infrastructures project falling within the scope of this decision's definition of eurosystem infrastructure project is to automatically be entrusted to the mib. only those projects explicitly entrusted by the governing council to the mib are to be managed by the mib. 1. role of the market infrastructure board the governing council hereby entrusts the mib with the performance of the tasks defined in this mandate. without prejudice to its ultimate decision-making power, the governing council has entrusted the mib with the performance of clearly defined tasks, related to both operation of eurosystem infrastructure services, as well as eurosystem infrastructure projects. the governing council, without prejudice to the ncbs' competence under the statute of the european system of central banks and of the european central bank, may assign to the mib further clearly defined tasks, in addition to those stipulated under paragraph 2, which are otherwise within the remit of the governing council. in the light of the governing council's ultimate competence on eurosystem infrastructures issues, any of its tasks entrusted to the mib can still be taken over and performed by the governing council. 2. responsibilities and tasks of the market infrastructure board 2.1. preparation of proposals for decision by the governing council on eurosystem infrastructure services and projects without prejudice to the responsibility of the executive board to prepare the meetings of the governing council and to be responsible for the current business of the ecb, the mib prepares proposals for the governing council to decide upon in the following matters, to the extent that the governing council has entrusted the mib with a specific project/infrastructure, and in full respect of the mandates of the escb committees established under article 9 of the ecb rules of procedure: (a) the overall strategy, including the definition of scope of services and service descriptions; (b) project governance issues; (c) financial matters, including: (i) the elaboration of the main features of the financial regime (in particular, budget, amount, time period cover, financing); (ii) regular analysis of the financial risks to which the eurosystem is exposed; (iii) the management rules for accounts held in the books of the ecb and managed by the mib on behalf of the eurosystem; (iv) cost methodology; (v) pricing policy; and (vi) liability regime analysis; (d) the overall planning; (e) the legal framework with the national central banks (ncbs) that provide market infrastructure services to or that execute eurosystem infrastructure projects with the eurosystem (the providing ncbs), and with customers, as well as any contractual arrangement or conditions to be signed between the eurosystem and external stakeholders; (f) the risk management framework; (g) service level agreements with relevant parties; (h) authorisation and prioritisation of change requests and testing/migration strategies; (i) network connectivity strategies; (j) crisis management strategies; (k) cyber resilience and information security strategy and frameworks; (l) liability and other claims; and (m) compliance of the eurosystem infrastructure services participants with the applicable eligibility criteria. 2.2. management activities in respect of eurosystem infrastructure services and projects 2.2.1. management and steering the mib carries out the overall management of eurosystem infrastructure services and projects, to the extent that the governing council has entrusted the mib with a specific project/infrastructure, and in full respect of the mandates of the escb committees established under article 9 of the ecb rules of procedure. in this context, the mib: (a) ensures that the eurosystem infrastructure services and projects meet the market needs; (b) implements and/or manages the overall strategies, including the definition of scope of service/s and/or service descriptions; (c) implements and/or manages the governance arrangements; (d) implements and/or manages the financial arrangements and strategies; (e) manages the relevant change and release management activities; (f) manages, within the parameters set by the governing council, the development, operation and maintenance of simulator tools, and manages, in consultation with the eurosystem's market infrastructure and payments committee (mipc) and other relevant escb committees where applicable and subject to a decision of the governing council, feasibility studies; (g) coordinates change management processes and prioritises authorised change relating to new releases, establishes test scenarios for eurosystem acceptance tests, coordinates tests which involve various types of stakeholders, and coordinates user testing processes; (h) manages the detailed planning of eurosystem infrastructure services and projects on the basis of the overall programme plans, as approved by the governing council; (i) implements and/or manages the relevant risk management frameworks, within the parameters set by the governing council; (j) implements and/or manages the relevant migration strategies, within the parameters set by the governing council; (k) implements and/or manages the relevant operational frameworks, including the incident and crisis management strategy, within the parameters set by the governing council; (l) ensures the proper functioning and quality of the eurosystem infrastructure services; (m) implements and/or manages the network connectivity strategies; (n) implements and/or manages the crisis management strategies; (o) implements and/or manages cyber resilience and information security strategy and frameworks; and (p) ensures compliance with regulatory and oversight requirements. 2.2.2. financial regime the mib approves and/or initiates: (a) the payment of instalments to the providing ncbs, in accordance with an agreed payment schedule approved by the governing council, once the relevant deliverables have been accepted by the mib; (b) the reimbursement of costs related to additional support from the providing ncbs to the eurosystem central banks, in accordance with the relevant level 2-level 3 agreement and any other related agreements; (c) the payment of instalments to the ecb, on the basis of the costs incurred by the latter in relation to eurosystem infrastructure services and projects; and (d) the collection of fees from customers, where applicable, and the reimbursement of these fees to eurosystem central banks. to the extent required, the ecb provides appropriate support to the mib. 2.2.3. relations with the providing ncbs the mib: (a) ensures the involvement of the providing ncbs in all relevant matters; (b) conducts the negotiations of any amendments to the relevant level 2-level 3 agreement and any other related agreements between the providing ncbs and the eurosystem central banks and submits such amendments for endorsement by the governing council; (c) establishes and maintains regular contacts with the providing ncbs in order to obtain all of the information needed for the performance of its tasks in line with such agreements; (d) validates proposals from the providing ncbs and approves of deliverables pertaining to the technical and functional design (developed by the providing ncbs); and (e) assists the governing council in managing the relationships with the providers of network connectivity services, where the latter form part of the eurosystem infrastructure service. 2.2.4. relations with eurosystem governance bodies and external stakeholders the mib: (a) manages, as appropriate, relations with the escb committees, with regulatory and oversight authorities, as well as with other relevant public authorities in relation to the eurosystem infrastructure services and projects; (b) interacts with customers and escb central banks to facilitate their migration, and discusses, coordinates and aims to find possible solutions to settle disputes within the applicable legal framework and within its mandate to be endorsed by the responsible bodies; (c) negotiates draft participation agreements (jointly with eurosystem central banks, where applicable) with eurosystem infrastructure services and projects participants, and non-euro area central banks which have signed participation agreements, including any amendment to these agreements; (d) coordinates with the other eurosystem infrastructure services and project governance bodies; (e) where relevant, appoints the chairpersons of the technical groups after consultation with the pertinent governance bodies, and ultimately receives reports from technical groups; (f) interacts with providers of network connectivity services where forming part of the eurosystem infrastructure service; (g) defines the technical communication policy in relation to the eurosystem infrastructure services and projects; and (h) ensures transparency through the timely and consistent publication of relevant technical documentation in relation to the eurosystem infrastructure services and projects subject to the confidentiality obligations set out in the code of conduct. annex ii market infrastructure board rules of procedure chapter 1 appointment and membership introduction the eurosystem offers market infrastructures, platforms, applications and related services in the fields of cash settlement, securities settlement and collateral management, comprising target services which include target2, t2s and tips services as well as, in the future, ecms (the eurosystem infrastructure services). the market infrastructure board (mib) is the governance body that supports the governing council (the governing council) of the european central bank (ecb) in ensuring that the eurosystem infrastructure services are maintained and further developed, as well as that projects concerning existing or new eurosystem infrastructure services (the eurosystem infrastructure projects or projects) are managed, in line with the treaty objectives of the european system of central banks (escb), the business needs, technological advances, the legal framework applicable to eurosystem infrastructure services and projects, as well as regulatory and oversight requirements, in full respect of the mandates of the escb committees established under article 9 of the ecb rules of procedure. the mib reports to the ecb decision-making bodies. this decision establishes no presumption to the effect that every new market infrastructures project falling within the scope of this decision's definition of eurosystem infrastructure project is to automatically be entrusted to the mib. only those projects explicitly entrusted by the governing council to the mib are to be managed by the mib. 1. designation and appointment mib members are appointed by the governing council on the basis of a proposal from the ecb's executive board (the executive board). applications are presented to the executive board by the governor or president, as applicable, of the relevant national central bank (ncb). in its proposal to the governing council, the executive board shall give preference to candidates who report directly to the highest governance body in their central bank. the executive board ensures in its proposal that the principles set out in section 3 of this annex ii are complied with. applications for non-central bank members of the mib are collected by the executive board pursuant to the procedure for selection of such members pursuant to annex iv to this decision. 2. membership and term of office participation of observers once appointed, mib members shall act independently and in the best interest of the eurosystem. they shall not be subject to instructions from any public or private body. mib members shall report collectively and exclusively to the ecb decision-making bodies when they act in their capacity as mib members. the central bank members of the mib may seek, where appropriate, at their own initiative and discretion, the views of other staff members from their central bank, but they shall neither seek nor take instructions from their central bank, or commit to take a specific position during the deliberations and voting of the mib. the mib has a chairperson who is a senior manager at the ecb. the mib is composed of thirteen (13) members, as follows: (a) nine members from eurosystem ncbs, including one member per ncb that provides market infrastructure services to the eurosystem or that executes eurosystem infrastructure projects with the eurosystem (the providing ncb); (b) two members from non-eurosystem ncbs participating in eurosystem infrastructure services (e.g. having signed the t2s currency participation agreement or participating in target2); (c) two non-central bank members (without voting rights), one with experience as a senior official in the payments industry, and one with experience as a senior official in the securities industry. the chairperson is supported by a deputy chairperson from the mib members who is appointed by the governing council. the exclusive task of the deputy chairperson shall be to chair mib meetings, in the chairperson's temporary absence during a meeting, in accordance with the pre-determined agenda for the mib meeting in question. the term of office of mib members lasts for 36 months and may be renewed. the governing council may decide on a shorter mandate, including when members resign or retire before the expiry of their mandate. in order to ensure that all ncbs (eurosystem and ncbs participating in the relevant eurosystem infrastructure services and projects) have the opportunity to send a representative to the mib, there should be a rotation of members from non-providing ncbs, normally at the time the initial 36 months' term of office of the mib members expires. it is understood that the above rotation scheme shall not result in the exclusion of the same non-providing ncb for more than two rotation periods. an appropriate balance shall be maintained between members with project management experience, experience in the eurosystem market infrastructure business, and it experience. the chairperson shall invite non-voting observers from relevant escb committees for discussing eurosystem infrastructure services or projects within their field of competence. the mib members are expected to dedicate at least 30 % of their working capacity to the mib issues. the mib members shall not be directly involved in the oversight of eurosystem's infrastructure services or of entities participating in the above (e.g. central securities depositories that outsource settlement operations to t2s), to the extent that such involvement could give rise to actual or potential conflicts with their functions as mib members. appropriate measures shall be put in place to identify and avoid any such conflicts. members shall not be part of the eurosystem's internal auditors committee (iac), nor shall they be involved in level 3 activities on a day-to-day basis. chapter 2 working procedures 1. decision-making in accordance with principles of good governance, members shall regularly participate in mib meetings. participation is strictly on a personal basis; members may not be replaced. in order for the mib to validly deliberate, there must be a quorum of seven members with voting rights. if there is no quorum, the chairperson may convene an extraordinary meeting at which decisions may be taken without regard to the quorum. to the extent possible, decisions of the mib are to be taken by way of consensus. failing that, and at the request of the chairperson, the mib may decide by way of simple majority vote. in the case of a tie, the chairperson shall have the casting vote. the mib proceeds to vote at the request of the chairperson. the chairperson shall also initiate a voting procedure upon the request of at least 3 mib members with a voting right. a member shall abstain from voting if they have a conflict of interest, within the meaning of the code of conduct. absent voting members may delegate their voting right in respect of a specific voting procedure to another voting member provided that no voting member may exercise more than two votes on any given issue. decisions may also be taken by written procedure, unless three or more members with voting rights object. a written procedure shall require: (a) no less than two working days' notice, (other than in exceptional circumstances, identified as such by the mib chairperson); and (b) a record of any such decision in the conclusions of the subsequent meeting of the mib. the non-central bank mib members are appointed in a personal capacity. they do not have voting rights and they may not delegate their responsibilities to another mib member or a third party. 2. conduct of mib meetings the mib decides on the dates of its meetings upon proposal by the chairperson. the mib should meet regularly based on a schedule it prepares in good time before the start of each year. the chairperson may convene extraordinary meetings of the mib whenever it may deem it necessary. the chairperson will convene an extraordinary meeting if a request for such a meeting is submitted by at least three members. the mib shall generally hold its meetings at the ecb's premises. meetings may also be held by means of teleconference, unless three or more members object. the mib adopts an agenda for each meeting. attendance at mib meetings is restricted to the mib members and other persons invited by the chairperson. 3. reporting to the ecb decision-making bodies the mib reports to the ecb decision-making bodies on a regular basis. in this respect, it prepares reports to the ecb decision-making bodies as necessary. 4. internal flow of information and transparency non-central bank mib members shall receive, under strict confidentiality conditions, all documentation on eurosystem infrastructure services and projects submitted to the governing council. eurosystem ncbs not represented in the mib shall have automatic access to all mib documentation, including mib agendas and minutes, at the same time as mib members and may provide written comments prior to mib meetings so that their views can be duly taken into account by the mib. they may also make a request to the chairperson to participate in the mib if they have a particular interest in a topic. the chairperson will be responsible for informing such eurosystem ncbs if it is considered that they might have a particular interest and may also bring any point raised by such a eurosystem ncb before the mib. in order to ensure that the eurosystem's market infrastructure and payments committee (mipc) is kept abreast of the mib's work, there will be a regular reporting item on mib topics on each mipc agenda. if deemed appropriate, joint meetings of the mipc and the mib may be held. the interaction between the mib and other escb committees shall take place by means of written consultations. the mib's activities are subject to the review of the iac. 5. external flow of information, transparency and representation the chairperson regularly informs any relevant stakeholder about all relevant issues concerning eurosystem infrastructure services and projects under the responsibility of the mib. the chairperson ensures transparency through the timely and consistent availability of relevant technical documentation in relation to the eurosystem infrastructure services and projects on the mib-dedicated section of the ecb's website. members must inform the chairperson in advance of undertaking any relevant and substantial external activities/communication in relation to the mib's responsibilities and tasks, such as speaking on eurosystem infrastructure services and projects under the responsibility of the mib at conferences or meetings with relevant stakeholders, and must provide the mib with a written summary within five working days following the event. any substantial external activity/communication must be in the interest of the eurosystem and must be consistent with any policy decisions of the governing council. 6. support the mib shall receive organisational support from the ecb, inter alia, for the preparation of the mib meetings, including the meeting documentation. as a rule, the ecb sends documents for discussion to members five working days in advance of a meeting. however, short documents may be sent one working day in advance. documents sent less than two working days in advance are considered table documents which cannot lead to a decision by the mib, unless all members agree otherwise. following each mib meeting, the ecb prepares draft minutes recording the topics that were under consideration and the results of the discussion, as well as the agreed follow-up. the draft minutes include positions expressed during the meeting by individual members when so requested. the draft minutes are circulated to the members within five working days of the meeting. also following each mib meeting, the ecb prepares a draft action list containing the tasks and deadlines that were allocated and agreed during that meeting, which is circulated to the members within five working days of the meeting. the draft minutes and action list are submitted to the mib for approval at the subsequent meeting (or, if necessary, earlier by written procedure) and are signed by the chairperson. the mib shall appoint, and receive input from, a controller, which may be one of its members. the mib may create substructures in agreement with the ecb. a substructure may be established differently to the mib composition, and it would be open to all eurosystem ncbs and, where relevant, non-eurosystem ncbs to participate. 7. revision of mandate the mib mandate may be reviewed every five years in the light of the experience made. annex iii market infrastructure board code of conduct introduction the market infrastructure board (mib) is composed of members appointed by the governing council (the governing council) of the european central bank (ecb). members must act solely in the best interest of the eurosystem and are to allocate sufficient time to their active involvement in the work of mib. the mib is the governance body that supports the governing council in ensuring that the eurosystem market infrastructures, platforms, applications and related services in the fields of cash settlement, securities settlement and collateral management (the eurosystem infrastructure services) are maintained and further developed, as well as that projects concerning existing or new eurosystem infrastructure services (the eurosystem infrastructure projects or projects) are managed, in line with the treaty objectives of the european system of central banks (escb), the business needs, technological advances, the legal framework applicable to eurosystem infrastructure services and projects, as well as regulatory and oversight requirements, in full respect of the mandates of the escb committees established under article 9 of the ecb rules of procedure. the mib reports to the ecb decision-making bodies. it is essential for the informed and independent decision-making of the governing council that the mib's work is unaffected by any circumstances that may give rise to a conflict of interest of any of its members. it is also essential for the preservation of the reputation and credibility of the eurosystem and the escb and for the legal soundness of the eurosystem infrastructure services and projects that the mib members be guided, and be seen to be guided, by the general interest of the eurosystem. members shall therefore (a) avoid situations of actual or apparent conflicts of interest; (b) only act in the best interests of the eurosystem in their dealings with public authorities, central banks, representatives of industry and other external stakeholders involved in the design, development and operation of market infrastructures, platforms, applications and related services offered by the eurosystem; and (c) ensure objectivity, neutrality and fair competition among suppliers with an interest in market infrastructures, platforms, applications and related services offered by the eurosystem. the obligation of professional secrecy stated in article 37.1 of the statute of the european system of central banks and of the european central bank (hereinafter the statute of the escb) applies to both ecb staff and national central bank (ncb) staff performing escb tasks, and covers, amongst other things, confidential information regarding trade secrets or any other information of a commercial value. an equivalent obligation applies to non-central bank members of the mib. non-central bank members must also comply with any additional rules of conduct that may be provided for in the letter of their appointment and in their contract with the ecb. it is appropriate, and consistent with good administrative practice, that the conditions of employment applicable to the chairperson of the mib, and the provisions applicable to mib members who are staff members of an ncb, should provide for legal redress for breaches of this code of conduct (the code). an equivalent provision applies to the non-central bank members of the mib, as described in annex iv. this code is without prejudice to any requirements resulting from other ethical provisions as may be applicable to the members of the mib in their function as members of staff of the ecb or an ncb. 1. definitions for the purposes of this code: (a) chairperson means the person appointed by the governing council to chair mib; (b) deputy chairperson means the person supporting the chairperson who is appointed from the mib members by the governing council. the exclusive task of the deputy chairperson shall be to chair mib meetings, in the chairperson's temporary absence during a meeting, in accordance with the pre-determined agenda for the mib meeting in question. (c) without prejudice to the obligation of professional secrecy in article 37.1 of the statute of the escb or to the classification of documents according to the ecb confidentiality regime which are provided to each member of the mib, confidential information means (i) trade secrets of the eurosystem or third parties and any information having a commercial value other than for the purpose of the work of the mib; (ii) any information the non-authorised disclosure of which, could harm the essential interests of the eurosystem; and (iii) any information that a reasonable person would consider to be confidential; confidential information does not include any information which: (i) is or becomes generally available to the public, other than through a breach of this code; or (ii) is developed independently by a third party with no access to confidential information; or (iii) subject to section 3, is required to be disclosed by law; (d) non-central bank member means a member of the mib who is not an ecb or an ncb staff member; (e) mandate means the mandate set out in annex i; (f) member means a member of the mib, including the chairperson; (g) suppliers means commercial entities and trade organisations currently providing or having an interest in providing goods and/or services related to the market infrastructures, platforms, applications and related services offered by the eurosystem. 2. avoidance of conflicts of interest (a) in respect of the provision of goods and/or services relevant to the mib's mandate, a conflict of interest shall be deemed to arise in the circumstances described in article 0.2.1.2 of the ecb staff rules, and, in particular, where a member has a commercial or professional interest or stake in a supplier, whether through ownership, control, investment, personal allegiance or otherwise, which actually influences, or may influence, the impartial and objective performance of that member's duties. (b) members shall act in the general interest of the eurosystem and in pursuit of the mib's responsibilities and tasks. they shall avoid any situations that are likely to give rise to a conflict of interest. (c) if a conflict of interest arises, or is likely to arise, in connection with the mib's tasks, the member concerned shall make known such actual or potential conflict of interest to the compliance authority of that member's central bank (or, in the case of a non-central bank board member, to the ecb's compliance and governance office) by using the form set out in appendix 2 and shall simultaneously inform the chairperson thereof. if the compliance authority (or, in the case of a non-central bank member, the ecb's compliance and governance office) concludes that a conflict of interest exists, it shall give its recommendation to the governor or president, as applicable, of the central bank concerned (or, in the case of a non-central bank member, to the ecb's president) regarding the appropriate management of the conflict of interest in question. (d) if, during a mib meeting, a member has reasons to believe that the participation of another member in the discussion, voting or written procedure of the mib could give rise to a conflict of interest, that member shall inform the chairperson immediately. (e) the chairperson shall invite the member about whom concerns with a conflict of interest have been raised pursuant to paragraph (c) and (d), to state whether an actual or potential conflict of interest exists. the chairperson shall inform the compliance authority of the central bank concerned (or, in the case of a non-central bank member, the ecb's compliance and governance office) of any such case without undue delay and, if deemed necessary, also the governing council. (f) if the chairperson is the concerned member under paragraph (c), (d) or (e), the chairperson shall inform the ecb's compliance and governance office. (g) members shall immediately recuse themselves from taking part in any discussions, deliberations or votes on any matter in respect of which that member has a conflict of interest and shall not be provided any related documentation. 3. proper use of confidential information (a) members shall use confidential information solely for the purposes of, and in the interests of, the eurosystem and in pursuit of the mib's objectives, in accordance with the mib's mandate. (b) members shall under no circumstances disclose, beyond their mandate, confidential information to third parties and/or entities in or outside the eurosystem. as regards the chairperson of the mib, and ncb staff members, they may only disclose confidential information to members of staff of their central bank on a strict need to know basis, and with the sole purpose of providing advice to enable an opinion on a specific issue to be formed. confidential information marked members only shall, in principle, not be disclosed by members to members of staff of their central bank, unless otherwise agreed by the mib. (c) members shall take all necessary measures to prevent the accidental disclosure of, or non-authorised access to, confidential information. (d) members shall not use confidential information for their own benefit or for the benefit of any other person in accordance with article 4.1.3 of the ecb's ethics framework and national measures implementing article 7(2) of guideline (eu) 2015/855 of the european central bank (1). in particular, they shall not take advantage of confidential information in any private financial transaction or in recommending or advising against such transactions. (e) in so far as a member is ordered by a court or a regulatory, supervisory or other competent authority that has jurisdiction over that member to disclose or make available confidential information, that member shall: (i) give prompt written notice, when permitted by law, of such an order to the chairperson and the compliance authority (or, in the case of a non-central bank member, the ecb's compliance and governance office) of their central bank, with as much detail as possible; (ii) obtain expert legal advice as to the lawfulness and enforceability of such an order, if considered necessary by the chairperson; (iii) cooperate with all the central banks concerned, and provide such assistance as the chairperson may reasonably request to allow the mib or the ncb of the member concerned to seek legal remedies to protect the confidential information; (iv) notify the court or authority concerned of the confidential nature of the information, and request the court or authority to preserve the confidentiality of the information, to the extent permitted by law. if the chairperson is concerned by this section, he/she shall inform the ecb's compliance and governance office. 4. principles of communication with external parties (a) subject to the requirements regarding confidential information, in their contacts with suppliers or trade organisations representing the suppliers, members shall strive to maintain fair competition and provide objective and pertinent information to all suppliers or representatives in a coordinated and non-discriminatory manner. depending on the information to be provided, this aim may be achieved by engaging them in constructive dialogue and sharing documentation with them in consultative groups. (b) members shall give due consideration to any written communication addressed to them by the suppliers or trade organisations representing the suppliers. members shall treat such communications as confidential, unless the contrary is explicitly stated by the supplier or representative. (c) paragraphs 4(a) and 4(b) shall not be construed as impeding contacts between the mib and the suppliers or trade organisations representing the suppliers. 5. advice on ethical questions if a member has any question on the application of the code, that member shall seek advice from the ecb's compliance and governance office. 6. sanctions and final provisions (a) without prejudice to the rules on disciplinary proceedings contained in their conditions of employment or to any applicable criminal, disciplinary, administrative or contractual penalty, a member who breaches this code shall be eligible for dismissal from the mib and replacement. (b) a member shall continue to be bound by sections 2 and 3 even after that member has ceased its duties as mib member. (c) a former member shall not use confidential information in order to gain employment with a supplier or reveal or use any confidential information acquired by virtue of their participation in the mib as an employee of a supplier. (d) during the first year after their duties have ceased, members shall continue to avoid any conflict of interest that could arise from any new professional activity or appointment. they shall, in particular, inform the chairperson in writing whenever they intend to engage in any professional activity or accept an appointment, and shall seek the mib's advice before committing themselves. the mib shall refer matters to the compliance and governance office, as appropriate. (e) if a former member does not respect the requirements set forth in paragraphs (c) and (d), the mib may inform that former member's employer that a conflict of interest arises or is likely to arise between that former member's new position and its previous position. 7. addressees and distribution this code is addressed to the members. a copy is distributed to each existing member and to new members upon appointment. members are requested to sign appendices 1 and 2 before attending their first mib meeting. (1) guideline (eu) 2015/855 of the european central bank of 12 march 2015 laying down the principles of a eurosystem ethics framework and repealing guideline ecb/2002/6 on minimum standards for the european central bank and national central banks when conducting monetary policy operations, foreign exchange operations with the ecb's foreign reserves and managing the ecb's foreign reserve assets (ecb/2015/11) (oj l 135, 2.6.2015, p. 23). appendix 1 declaration of compliance with the code of conduct by this declaration, i accept the attached code of conduct and acknowledge my obligations hereunder, in particular my obligation to (a) treat in strictest confidence and not disclose any confidential information acquired by me, also in accordance with the ecb confidentiality regime; (b) avoid and declare situations that would involve a conflict of interest in the performance of my duties as a member of the market infrastructure board (the mib) in relation to the mib's competences; and (c) not use confidential information for my own benefit or for the benefit of any other person; in particular, i shall not take advantage of confidential information in any private financial transaction or in recommending or advising against such transactions. (signature and date) (full name) (address) appendix 2 declaration of interest (1) (full name) (address) (occupation) the competences of the market infrastructure board (the mib) are directly or indirectly (e.g. in relation to a family member) affected by the following pecuniary and/or non-pecuniary interests, which might create a conflict of interest within the meaning of the code of conduct (2): investment (e.g. direct or indirect in a commercial entity, including subsidiaries or other entities belonging to the same corporate group, which has an interest as a supplier, unless held via investment or pension funds or similar): position (e.g. current or previous, paid or unpaid, with a commercial entity which has an interest as a supplier): income or gifts (e.g. current, previous or expected remuneration, including deferred benefits, options to be exercised at a later stage and pension rights transfers, or gifts, received from a commercial entity which has an interest as a supplier): other: i hereby declare, on my honour, that the information disclosed is true and complete to the best of my knowledge. (signature and date) (full name) (1) if a member has no relevant interest, this should be indicated by stating none in the relevant field(s). (2) a member with a relevant interest should describe all relevant facts and circumstances, using additional space if necessary. annex iv procedures and requirements for the selection, appointment and replacement of the non-central bank members of the market infrastructure board 1. call for competition 1.1. the european central bank (the ecb) shall publish a call for competition for experts to be appointed as non-central bank members of the market infrastructure board (the mib) and to create a reserve list. the call for competition shall be carried out in accordance with decision (eu) 2016/245 of the european central bank (ecb/2016/2) (1). however, it shall deviate from article 22 of decision (eu) 2016/245. the call for competition shall be consistent with at least the main principles of public procurement and ensuring proper and transparent competition. 1.2. the call for competition shall set out, amongst other things: (a) the role of the mib; (b) the role of the non-central bank members of the mib; (c) the selection criteria; (d) relevant financial aspects; and (e) the application procedure, including a deadline for receipt of applications. 1.3. the call for competition shall be published simultaneously in the official journal of the european union and on the ecb's website. where appropriate, the ecb may use additional means to publicise the call for competition. in case of discrepancies, the version published in the official journal of the european union shall take precedence over other versions. 1.4. the deadline for candidates to submit an application shall be at least 35 calendar days following publication of the call for competition in the official journal of the european union. 2. selection procedure 2.1. the ecb's governing council (the governing council) shall appoint the non-central bank members of the mib on the basis of a proposal of the ecb's executive board (the executive board), following the completion of the relevant procurement procedure. 2.2. the executive board shall evaluate the candidates according to the selection criteria set out in section 3 of this annex iv. 2.3. the mib chairperson, representatives from eurosystem national central banks, and ecb staff may support the executive board in completing the candidate assessment forms, which include a summary of merits and shortcomings of the candidate in the context of the selection criteria for the mandate and a recommendation for appointment according to a candidate's suitability. 2.4. in deviation from article 22(6) of decision (eu) 2016/245 (ecb/2016/2), two candidates shall be appointed directly, and a reserve list of candidates shall be established for future vacancies. 3. selection criteria the selection criteria are as follows: (a) expertise as a senior official in the payments industry or expertise in the securities industry, either as a service provider or as a user of services in this field, as well as expertise relating to the wider union financial sector; (b) at least 10 years of experience in interacting with major market players in union financial markets; (c) relevant experience, preferably in project management; and (d) the ability to effectively communicate in english. 4. reserve list 4.1. the ecb shall aim to always maintain a reserve list of candidates to fill the positions of non-central bank members of the mib. 4.2. if a non-central bank member vacancy arises in the mib, the executive board may select a candidate from the reserve list according to their ranking and propose them to the governing council as non-central members of the mib for a 36 months' or shorter mandate. that mandate may be renewable for a further term of no longer than 36 months so that the total term does not exceed the maximum term permitted for non-central bank members of six years. 4.3. the reserve list shall remain valid for a period of thirty-sixth months once it has been approved by the governing council. the governing council may extend the validity of the reserve list for a further period of 36 months if it deems it necessary to do so. 4.4. in deviation from article 22(7) of decision (eu) 2016/245 (ecb/2016/2), the reserve list shall not be open for new applicants. 4.5. in deviation from article 22(8) of decision (eu) 2016/245 (ecb/2016/2), candidates may access, update or correct their data but may not update or correct information relevant to their fulfilment of the selection criteria after the closing date of the call for competition. 5. appointment 5.1. non-central bank members of the mib shall be appointed in their personal capacity. they may not delegate their responsibilities to another member or a third party. 5.2. all appointments shall be subject to the appointee signing a contract of appointment countersigned by the mib chairperson as well as a contract with the ecb, setting out the applicable indemnities and rights of reimbursement in respect of expenses, and also the declarations referred to in section 6.1. 5.3. the governing council shall appoint non-central bank members of the mib as non-voting members of the mib for up to 36 months, renewable for a further term of no longer than 36 months so that the total term does not exceed the maximum term permitted for non-central bank members of six years. 6. declarations 6.1. non-central bank members of the mib commit to abide by the mib code of conduct. accordingly, they are required to sign the declaration of compliance with the code of conduct in appendix 1 of annex iii and to complete and sign the declaration of interest in appendix 2 of annex iii. 6.2. non-central bank members of the mib are also required to sign the declarations provided in the call for competition. 7. termination and replacement 7.1. the governing council may terminate the mandate of a non-central bank member of the mib if, in the case of that non-central bank member, any of the following occurs: a conflict of interest, a breach of duty, an inability to perform their duties, a breach of the code of conduct and/or serious misconduct. 7.2. the mandate of a non-central bank member is considered as terminated when that non-central bank member resigns or its mandate expires without being renewed. 7.3. if a mandate is terminated prior to the end of a 36 months' term, sections 4.2 and 4.3 shall apply. (1) decision (eu) 2016/245 of the european central bank of 9 february 2016 laying down the rules on procurement (ecb/2016/2) (oj l 45, 20.2.2016, p. 15).

name: european securities and markets authority decision (eu) 2019/155 of 23 january 2019 renewing the temporary restriction on the marketing, distribution or sale of contracts for differences to retail clients type: decision subject matter: eu institutions and european civil service; free movement of capital; marketing date published: 2019-01-31 31.1.2019 en official journal of the european union l 27/36 european securities and markets authority decision (eu) 2019/155 of 23 january 2019 renewing the temporary restriction on the marketing, distribution or sale of contracts for differences to retail clients the european securities and markets authority board of supervisors, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to regulation (eu) no 1095/2010 of the european parliament and of the council of 24 november 2010 establishing a european supervisory authority (european securities and markets authority), amending decision no 716/2009/ec and repealing commission decision 2009/77/ec (1), and in particular articles 9(5), 43(2) and 44(1) thereof, having regard to regulation (eu) no 600/2014 of the european parliament and of the council of 15 may 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending regulation (eu) no 648/2012 (2), and in particular article 40 thereof, having regard to commission delegated regulation (eu) 2017/567 of 18 may 2016 supplementing regulation (eu) no 600/2014 of the european parliament and of the council with regard to definitions, transparency, portfolio compression and supervisory measures on product intervention and positions (3), and in particular article 19 thereof, whereas: (1) by decision (eu) 2018/796 (4), the european securities and markets authority (esma) restricted the marketing, distribution or sale of contracts for differences (cfds) to retail clients with effect from 1 august 2018 for a period of three months. (2) in accordance with article 40(6) of regulation (eu) no 600/2014, esma must review a temporary product intervention measure at appropriate intervals and at least every three months. (3) by decision (eu) 2018/1636 (5), esma renewed and amended the temporary restriction on the marketing, distribution or sale of cfds to retail clients with effect from 1 november 2018 for a period of three months. (4) esma's further review of the restriction on cfds has been informed by, inter alia, a survey among national competent authorities (6) (ncas) on the practical application and impact of the product intervention measure as well as additional information provided by ncas and stakeholders. (5) ncas detected only limited examples of non-compliance with the esma product intervention measure, which mainly related to the risk warnings. (6) ncas reported an overall decrease in the number of cfd retail client accounts, trading volume and total retail client equity over the three months from august to october 2018 (2018 period) in comparison with the same period in 2017 (2017 period). the share of profitable retail client accounts remained broadly stable when comparing these periods. the average costs incurred by retail clients while trading cfds, which appear to be less dependent on market conditions than the overall client outcomes, were significantly lower in the 2018 period in comparison to the 2017 period (7). average costs in respect of active retail accounts containing cfds on cryptocurrencies fell disproportionately in comparison to others, though such accounts continued to incur higher costs than accounts with no cryptocurrency exposure. finally, ncas reported a sustained decrease in the number of automatic close-outs, the number of times accounts went into negative equity and the size of negative equity balances (8). (7) ncas also reported an increase in the number of clients treated as professional clients on request in the 2018 period in comparison with the 2017 period. esma is aware that some cfd providers are advertising to retail clients the possibility of becoming professional clients on request. however, a retail client may request to be treated as a professional client when, in particular, the client submits a request in writing in accordance with all the requirements set out in the applicable legislation. providers should ensure that they comply at all times with those requirements (9). esma is also aware that some third-country firms are actively approaching union clients or that some cfd providers in the union are marketing the possibility for retail clients to move their accounts to an intra-group third-country entity. however, without authorisation or registration in the union, third-country firms are only allowed to offer services to clients established or situated in the union at the client's own exclusive initiative. finally, esma is aware that firms are starting to provide other speculative investment products. esma will continue to monitor the offer of these other products to determine whether any other union measures are appropriate. (8) since the adoption of decision (eu) 2018/796, esma did not obtain evidence contradicting its overall finding of a significant investor protection concern identified in decision (eu) 2018/796 or decision (eu) 2018/1636 (decisions). esma has therefore concluded that the significant investor protection concern identified in the decisions would persist if the temporary restriction on the marketing, distribution or sale of cfds to retail clients is not renewed. (9) moreover, the applicable existing regulatory requirements under union law have not changed and continue not to address the threat identified by esma. furthermore, ncas have not taken action to address the threat or the actions taken do not adequately address the threat. in particular, since the adoption of decision (eu) 2018/796, no nca has adopted its own national product intervention measure under article 42 of regulation (eu) no 600/2014 (10). (10) the renewal of the restriction does not have a detrimental effect on the efficiency of financial markets or on investors that is disproportionate to the benefits of the action and does not create a risk of regulatory arbitrage for the same reasons set out in the decisions. (11) if the temporary restriction is not renewed, esma continues to consider it likely that cfds will again be offered to retail clients without adequate measures to sufficiently protect them against the risks related to those products that gave rise to the consumer detriment identified in the decisions. (12) in view of these reasons, taken together with the reasons set out in the decisions, esma has decided to renew the restriction on the same terms as those set out in decision (eu) 2018/1636 for a further three-month period to address the significant investor protection concern. (13) as the proposed measures may, to a limited extent, relate to agricultural commodities derivatives, esma has consulted the public bodies competent for the oversight, administration and regulation of physical agricultural markets under council regulation (ec) no 1234/2007 (11). none of those bodies has raised any objections to the proposed renewal of the measures. (14) esma has notified ncas of the proposed renewal decision, has adopted this decision article 1 definitions for the purposes of this decision: (a) contract for differences or cfd means a derivative other than an option, future, swap or forward rate agreement, the purpose of which is to give the holder a long or short exposure to fluctuations in the price, level or value of an underlying, irrespective of whether it is traded on a trading venue, and that must be settled in cash or may be settled in cash at the option of one of the parties other than by reason of default or other termination event; (b) excluded non-monetary benefit means any non-monetary benefit other than, insofar as they relate to cfds, information and research tools; (c) initial margin means any payment for the purpose of entering into a cfd, excluding commission, transaction fees and any other related costs; (d) initial margin protection means the initial margin determined by annex i; (e) margin close-out protection means the closure of one or more of a retail client's open cfds on terms most favourable to the client in accordance with articles 24 and 27 of directive 2014/65/eu when the sum of funds in the cfd trading account and the unrealised net profits of all open cfds connected to that account falls to less than half of the total initial margin protection for all those open cfds; (f) negative balance protection means the limit of a retail client's aggregate liability for all cfds connected to a cfd trading account with a cfd provider to the funds in that cfd trading account. article 2 temporary restriction on cfds in respect of retail clients the marketing, distribution or sale to retail clients of cfds is restricted to circumstances where at least all of the following conditions are met: (a) the cfd provider requires the retail client to pay the initial margin protection; (b) the cfd provider provides the retail client with the margin close-out protection; (c) the cfd provider provides the retail client with the negative balance protection; (d) the cfd provider does not directly or indirectly provide the retail client with a payment, monetary or excluded non-monetary benefit in relation to the marketing, distribution or sale of a cfd, other than the realised profits on any cfd provided; and (e) the cfd provider does not send directly or indirectly a communication to or publish information accessible by a retail client relating to the marketing, distribution or sale of a cfd unless it includes the appropriate risk warning specified by and complying with the conditions in annex ii. article 3 prohibition of participating in circumvention activities it shall be prohibited to participate, knowingly and intentionally, in activities the object or effect of which is to circumvent the requirements in article 2, including by acting as a substitute for the cfd provider. article 4 entry into force and application 1. this decision enters into force on the day following that of its publication in the official journal of the european union. 2. this decision shall apply from 1 february 2019 for a period of 3 months. done at paris, 23 january 2019. for the board of supervisors steven maijoor the chair (1) oj l 331, 15.12.2010, p. 84. (2) oj l 173, 12.6.2014, p. 84. (3) oj l 87, 31.3.2017, p. 90. (4) european securities and markets authority decision (eu) 2018/796 of 22 may 2018 to temporarily restrict contracts for differences in the union in accordance with article 40 of regulation (eu) no 600/2014 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 136, 1.6.2018, p. 50). (5) european securities and markets authority decision (eu) 2018/1636 of 23 october 2018 renewing and amending the temporary restriction in decision (eu) 2018/796 on the marketing, distribution or sale of contracts for differences to retail clients (oj l 272, 31.10.2018, p. 62). (6) 26 ncas have responded: financial market authority (at-fma), cyprus securities and exchange commission (cy-cysec), czech national bank (cz-cnb), bundesanstalt f r finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (de-bafin), finanstilsynet (dk-finanstilsynet), hellenic capital markets commission (el-hcmc), comisi n nacional del mercado de valores (es-cnmv), finnish financial supervisory authority (fi-fsa), autorit des march s financiers (fr-amf), magyar nemzeti bank (hu-mnb), central bank of ireland (ie-cbi), financial supervisory authority (is-fme), lietuvos bankas (lt-lb), commissione nazionale per le societ e la borsa (it-consob), commission de surveillance du secteur financier (lu-cssf), finan u un kapit la tirgus komisija (lv-fktk), malta financial services authority (mt-mfsa), autoriteit financi le markten (nl-afm), finanstilsynet (finanstilsynet-no), komisja nadzoru finansowego (pl-knf), comiss o do mercado de valores mobili rios (pt-cmvm), romanian financial supervisory authority (ro-fsa), finansinspektionen (se-finansinspektionen), agencija za trg vrednostnih papirjev (atvp-si) national bank of slovakia (nbs-sk), financial conduct authority (uk-fca). (7) this is consistent with observed decreases in total trade volumes on which spreads and fees are typically calculated. average client equity increased slightly among active retail client accounts, though this was a significantly smaller change in percentage terms than the decrease in total trade volumes and total exposure for these accounts. (8) in the period from august to october 2018, the negative balance protection was applicable. however, market gapping can lead to the client initially being closed out at a price that creates negative equity, with the account then re-credited back to zero equity by the provider to meet the new requirement of negative balance protection. this was also the case for those providers that offered negative balance protection in the same period in 2017. (9) annex ii, section ii of directive 2014/65/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 15 may 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending directive 2002/92/ec and directive 2011/61/eu (oj l 173, 12.6.2014, p. 349). see also section 11 of esma's questions and answers on mifid ii and mifir investor protection and intermediaries topics (esma35-43-349), where esma has identified forms of practices that investment firms should not use when applying the legal requirements on the categorisation of clients as professionals on request. section 11 was last updated on 25 may 2018. (10) esma has taken into account that: (a) on 4 june 2018, a competent authority of an eea efta state, no-finanstilsynet, adopted national product intervention measures that have the same terms and dates of application of esma's measures; (b) on 6 july 2018, in romania national law started to apply that has similar terms as esma's measures. (11) council regulation (ec) no 1234/2007 of 22 october 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (single cmo regulation) (oj l 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1). annex i initial margin percentages by type of underlying (a) 3,33 % of the notional value of the cfd when the underlying currency pair is composed of any two of the following currencies: us dollar, euro, japanese yen, pound sterling, canadian dollar or swiss franc; (b) 5 % of the notional value of the cfd when the underlying index, currency pair or commodity is: (i) any of the following equity indices: financial times stock exchange 100 (ftse 100); cotation assist e en continu 40 (cac 40); deutsche bourse ag german stock index 30 (dax30); dow jones industrial average (djia); standard & poors 500 (s&p 500); nasdaq composite index (nasdaq), nasdaq 100 index (nasdaq 100); nikkei index (nikkei 225); standard & poors/australian securities exchange 200 (asx 200); euro stoxx 50 index (euro stoxx 50); (ii) a currency pair composed of at least one currency that is not listed in point (a) above; or (iii) gold; (c) 10 % of the notional value of the cfd when the underlying commodity or equity index is a commodity or any equity index other than those listed in point (b) above; (d) 50 % of the notional value of the cfd when the underlying is a cryptocurrency; or (e) 20 % of the notional value of the cfd when the underlying is: (i) a share; or (ii) not otherwise listed in this annex. annex ii risk warnings section a risk warning conditions 1. the risk warning shall be in a layout ensuring its prominence, in a font size at least equal to the predominant font size and in the same language as that used in the communication or published information. 2. if the communication or published information is in a durable medium or a webpage, the risk warning shall be in the format specified in section b. 3. if the communication or published information is in a medium other than a durable medium or a webpage, the risk warning shall be in the format specified in section c. 4. by way of derogation to paragraphs 2 and 3, if the number of characters contained in the risk warning in the format specified in section b or c exceeds the character limit permitted in the standard terms of a third party marketing provider, the risk warning may instead be in the format specified in section d. 5. if the risk warning in the format specified in section d is used, the communication or published information shall also include a direct link to the webpage of the cfd provider containing the risk warning in the format specified in section b. 6. the risk warning shall include an up-to-date provider-specific loss percentage based on a calculation of the percentage of cfd trading accounts provided to retail clients by the cfd provider that lost money. the calculation shall be performed every three months and cover the 12-month period preceding the date on which it is performed (12-month calculation period). for the purposes of the calculation: (a) an individual retail client cfd trading account shall be considered to have lost money if the sum of all realised and unrealised net profits on cfds connected to the cfd trading account during the 12-month calculation period is negative; (b) any costs relating to the cfds connected to the cfd trading account shall be included in the calculation, including all charges, fees and commissions; (c) the following items shall be excluded from the calculation: (i) any cfd trading account that did not have an open cfd connected to it within the calculation period; (ii) any profits or losses from products other than cfds connected to the cfd trading account; (iii) any deposits or withdrawals of funds from the cfd trading account. 7. by way of derogation from paragraphs 2 to 6, if in the last 12-month calculation period a cfd provider has not provided an open cfd connected to a retail client cfd trading account, that cfd provider shall use the standard risk warning in the format specified in sections e to g, as appropriate. section b durable medium and webpage provider-specific risk warning cfds are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. [insert percentage per provider] % of retail investor accounts lose money when trading cfds with this provider. you should consider whether you understand how cfds work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. section c abbreviated provider-specific risk warning [insert percentage per provider] % of retail investor accounts lose money when trading cfds with this provider. you should consider whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. section d reduced character provider-specific risk warning [insert percentage per provider] % of retail cfd accounts lose money. section e durable medium and webpage standard risk warning cfds are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money rapidly due to leverage. between 74-89 % of retail investor accounts lose money when trading cfds. you should consider whether you understand how cfds work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. section f abbreviated standard risk warning between 74-89 % of retail investor accounts lose money when trading cfds. you should consider whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money. section g reduced character standard risk warning 74-89 % of retail cfd accounts lose money.

name: council decision (eu) 2019/152 of 28 january 2019 appointing a member, proposed by the kingdom of belgium, of the committee of the regions type: decision subject matter: eu institutions and european civil service; europe date published: 2019-01-31 31.1.2019 en official journal of the european union l 27/31 council decision (eu) 2019/152 of 28 january 2019 appointing a member, proposed by the kingdom of belgium, of the committee of the regions the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 305 thereof, having regard to the proposal of the belgian government, whereas: (1) on 26 january 2015, 5 february 2015 and 23 june 2015, the council adopted decisions (eu) 2015/116 (1), (eu) 2015/190 (2) and (eu) 2015/994 (3) appointing the members and alternate members of the committee of the regions for the period from 26 january 2015 to 25 january 2020. (2) a member's seat on the committee of the regions has become vacant following the end of the mandate on the basis of which mr alain hutchinson (conseiller communal et chevin saint-gilles) was proposed, has adopted this decision: article 1 the following is hereby appointed as a member of the committee of the regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 january 2020: mr alain hutchinson, commissaire pour l'europe et l'accueil des organisations internationales (change of mandate). article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at brussels, 28 january 2019. for the council the president p. daea (1) council decision (eu) 2015/116 of 26 january 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the committee of the regions for the period from 26 january 2015 to 25 january 2020 (oj l 20, 27.1.2015, p. 42). (2) council decision (eu) 2015/190 of 5 february 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the committee of the regions for the period from 26 january 2015 to 25 january 2020 (oj l 31, 7.2.2015, p. 25). (3) council decision (eu) 2015/994 of 23 june 2015 appointing the members and alternate members of the committee of the regions for the period from 26 january 2015 to 25 january 2020 (oj l 159, 25.6.2015, p. 70).

name: council decision (eu) 2019/136 of 28 january 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the european union within the working group on wine established by the agreement between the european union and japan for an economic partnership as regards the forms to be used for certificates for the import of wine products originating in japan into the european union and the modalities concerning self-certification type: decision subject matter: cooperation policy; asia and oceania; beverages and sugar; international trade; european construction; tariff policy; trade date published: 2019-01-29 29.1.2019 en official journal of the european union l 25/25 council decision (eu) 2019/136 of 28 january 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the european union within the working group on wine established by the agreement between the european union and japan for an economic partnership as regards the forms to be used for certificates for the import of wine products originating in japan into the european union and the modalities concerning self-certification the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular the first subparagraph of article 207(4) in conjunction with article 218(9) thereof, having regard to the proposal from the european commission, whereas: (1) the agreement between the european union and japan for an economic partnership (1) (the agreement) was concluded by the union by council decision (eu) 2018/1907 (2). it enters into force on 1 february 2019. (2) pursuant to paragraph 1 of article 2.28 of the agreement, a certificate authenticated in conformity with the laws and regulations of japan, including a self-certificate established by a producer authorised by the competent authority of japan, suffices as documentation serving as evidence that the requirements for the importation and sale in the union of wine products originating in japan referred to in article 2.25, 2.26 or 2.27 of the agreement have been fulfilled. (3) pursuant to paragraph 2 of article 2.28 of the agreement, the working group on wine is, by decision, to adopt the modalities for the implementation of paragraph 1 of that article, and in particular the forms to be used, and the information to be provided on the certificate. (4) subparagraph 2(a) of article 2.35 of the agreement provides that the working group on wine is to adopt the modalities concerning self-certification. (5) pursuant to paragraph 3 of article 2.35 of the agreement, the working group on wine is to hold its first meeting on the date of entry into force of the agreement. (6) the working group on wine, during its first meeting on 1 february 2019, is to adopt the decision on the forms to be used for certificates for the import of wine products originating in japan into the union and on the modalities concerning the self-certification in order to allow for the effective implementation of the agreement and thus simplify import of wine products originating in japan. the envisaged forms and modalities concerning the self-certification are consistent with the union policies on facilitating trade and cooperating on prevention of fraud with third countries that concluded agreements with the union. (7) it is appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the union's behalf within the working group on wine. (8) the position of the union within the working group on wine should therefore be based on the attached draft decision, has adopted this decision: article 1 the position to be taken on the union's behalf within the working group on wine at its first meeting shall be based on the draft decision attached to this decision. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at brussels, 28 january 2019. for the council the president p. daea (1) oj l 330, 27.12.2018, p. 3. (2) council decision (eu) 2018/1907 of 20 december 2018 on the conclusion of the agreement between the european union and japan for an economic partnership (oj l 330, 27.12.2018, p. 1). draft decision no 1/2019 of the eu-japan working group on wine of on the adoption of the forms to be used for certificates for the import of wine products originating in japan into the european union and the modalities concerning self-certification the working group on wine, having regard to the agreement between the european union and japan for an economic partnership, and in particular articles 2.28 and 2.35 thereof, whereas: (1) the agreement between the european union and japan for an economic partnership (the agreement) enters into force on 1 february 2019. (2) article 22.4 of the agreement establishes a working group on wine, which, inter alia, is responsible for the effective implementation and operation of section c and annex 2-e of the agreement. (3) pursuant to paragraph 1 of article 2.28 of the agreement, a certificate authenticated in conformity with the laws and regulations of japan, including a self-certificate established by a producer authorised by the competent authority of japan, suffices as documentation serving as evidence that the requirements for the importation and sale in the european union of wine products originating in japan referred to in article 2.25, 2.26 or 2.27 of the agreement have been fulfilled. (4) pursuant to subparagraph 2(a) of article 2.28 of the agreement, the forms to be used for certificates and the information to be provided on the certificates are to be adopted by decision of the working group on wine established pursuant to article 22.4 of the agreement. (5) pursuant to subparagraph 2(a) of article 2.35 of the agreement, the modalities concerning self-certification are to be adopted by the working group on wine, has adopted this decision: article 1 1. the form to be used for certificates authenticated in conformity with the laws and regulations of japan is set out in annex i to this decision. 2. the form to be used for self-certificates established by producers authorised by the competent authority of japan is set out in annex ii to this decision. 3. the modalities concerning self-certification by producers authorised by the competent authority of japan are set out in annex iii to this decision. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. for the working group on wine [ ] annex i text of image template of certificate issued by the national research institute of brewing [nrib]for the imports of wine products originating in japan into the eu (1) 1. exporter (full name and address) third country of issue: japan simplified vi 1 serial no (2): document for the import of wine,grape juice or grape must into theeuropean union 2. consignee (name and address) 3. customs stamp (for official eu use only) 4. means of transport and transport details (3) 5. place of unloading (if different from 2) 6. description of the imported product (4) 7. quantity in l/hl/kg 8. number of containers (5) 9. certificate the product described above is intended for direct human consumption and complies with the definitions and oenological practices authorised in section c of chapter 2 of the agreement between the european union and japan for an economic partnership. name and address of the producer: full name and address of the competent body: place and date: national research institute of brewing under the supervision of the ministry of finance of japan 3-7-1, kagamiyama, higashihiroshima, hiroshima, japan stamp of the competent body: signature, name and title of official of the competent body: (1) in accordance with article 2.28 of the agreement between the european union and japan for an economic partnership. (2) this is the traceability number of the lot allocated by the nrib. (3) indicate: transport used for delivery to the point of entry into the eu; specify transport mode (ship, air, etc.), give name of ship, etc. (4) indicate the following information: sale designation as it appears on the label (such as name of producer, wine-growing region, brand name, etc.); name of the country of origin: [indicate japan]; name of the gi, if relevant; actual alcoholic strength by volume colour of the product (state red, ros , pink or white only); combined nomenclature code (cn code). (5) a container means a recipient for wine of less than 60 litres. the number of containers may be the number of bottles. text of image attribution (entry into free circulation and issue of extracts) quantity 10. no and date of customs document of release for free circulation and of the extract 11. full name and address of consignee (extract) 12. seal authority of the competent available attributed available attributed available attributed 13. additional observations annex ii text of image template of self-certificate for the imports of wine products originating injapan into the european union (1) 1. exporter (full name and address) third country of issue: japan simplified vi 1 serial no (2): document for the import of wine,grape juice or grape must into theeuropean union 2. consignee (name and address) 3. customs stamp (for official eu use only) 4. means of transport and transport details (3) 5. place of unloading (if different from 2) 6. description of the imported product (4) 7. quantity in l/hl/kg 8. number of containers (5) 9. certificate the product described above is intended for direct human consumption and complies with the definitions and oenological practices authorised in section c of chapter 2 of the agreement between the european union and japan for an economic partnership. it has been produced by a producer who has been individually authorised by the national tax agency of japan for the production of wine and by the national research institute of brewing (nrib) for the self-certification. the producer is subject to inspection and supervision by the nrib. name, address and registration/authorisation number of the authorised producer: full name and address of the competent body: place and date: national research institute of brewing under the supervision of the ministry of finance of japan 3-7-1, kagamiyama, higashihiroshima, hiroshima, japan stamp of the competent body: signature, name and title of official of the competent body: (1) in accordance with article 2.28 of the agreement between the european union and japan for an economic partnership. (2) this is the traceability number of the lot allocated by the national research institute of brewing (nrib). (3) indicate: transport used for delivery to the point of entry into the eu; specify transport mode (ship, air, etc.), give name of ship, etc. (4) indicate the following information: sale designation as it appears on the label (such as name of producer, wine-growing region, brand name, etc.); name of the country of origin: [indicate japan]; name of the gi, if relevant; actual alcoholic strength by volume colour of the product (state red, ros , pink or white only); combined nomenclature code (cn code). (5) a container means a recipient for wine of less than 60 litres. the number of containers may be the number of bottles. text of image 10. analysis report (describing the analytical characteristics of the product described above) for grape must and grape juice: no information required for wine and grape must still in fermentation: actual alcoholic strength by volume: for all products: total sulphur dioxide content: total acidity: stamp of the authorised producer: place and date: signature, name and title of the authorised producer: text of image attribution (entry into free circulation and issue of extracts) quantity 11. no and date of customs document of release for free circulation and of the extract 12. full name and address of consignee (extract) 13. seal authority of the competent available attributed available attributed available attributed 14. additional observations annex iii modalities concerning self-certification 1. the national research institute of brewing, under the supervision of the ministry of finance of japan, (a) individually appoints the producers authorised in japan to draw up the self-certificates referred to in article 2.28 of the agreement between the european union and japan for an economic partnership; (b) supervises and inspects the authorised producers; and (c) notifies the european union: twice a year, in the months of january and july, of the names and addresses of the authorised producers together with their official registration numbers; and without delay, of any modification of the names and addresses or withdrawal of any authorised producers. 2. the european union publishes and updates without delay the names and addresses of the authorised producers in the list entitled third countries competent bodies, designated laboratories and authorised wine producers and processors for drawing up vi-1 documents for wine imports into the eu' which is available on the official website of the european commission: ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/wine/lists/06.pdf

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/120 of 24 january 2019 amending council directive 2008/90/ec as regards the extension of the derogation relating to import conditions for fruit plant propagating material and fruit plants intended for fruit production from third countries (notified under document c(2019) 254) type: decision_impl subject matter: marketing; agricultural policy; agricultural activity; trade; natural environment; cooperation policy; means of agricultural production; european union law date published: 2019-01-28 28.1.2019 en official journal of the european union l 24/27 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/120 of 24 january 2019 amending council directive 2008/90/ec as regards the extension of the derogation relating to import conditions for fruit plant propagating material and fruit plants intended for fruit production from third countries (notified under document c(2019) 254) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to council directive 2008/90/ec of 29 september 2008 on the marketing of fruit plant propagating material and fruit plants intended for fruit production (1), and in particular the second subparagraph of article 12(2) thereof, whereas: (1) article 12(1) of directive 2008/90/ec requires the commission to decide whether propagating material and fruit plants produced in a third country and affording the same guarantees as regards obligations on the supplier, identity, characteristics, plant health, growing medium, packaging, inspection arrangements, marking and sealing are equivalent in all these respects to propagating material and fruit plants produced in the union and complying with the requirements and conditions of that directive. article 12(2) of directive 2008/90/ec provides for a derogation allowing member states, pending such decision, to apply to the import of propagating material and fruit plants conditions at least equivalent to those that apply to fruit plant propagating material and fruits plants produced in the union. (2) such derogation has been granted until 31 december 2018. member states may therefore apply conditions equivalent to commission implementing directives 2014/96/eu (2), 2014/97/eu (3) and 2014/98/eu (4). (3) the information presently available on the conditions applying in third countries is still not sufficient to enable the commission to adopt any such decision in respect of any third country at this stage. (4) in order to prevent trade patterns from being disrupted, member states should continue to benefit from that derogation. (5) as from 14 december 2019, the new plant health rules set out in regulation (eu) 2016/2031 of the european parliament and of the council (5) will apply. under those new rules, the pests which are currently listed in implementing directive 2014/98/eu as well as the health requirements for propagating material will fall within the scope of that regulation. it is thus appropriate to allow a sufficient period of time to assess compliance by third countries with the new plant health rules set out in regulation (eu) 2016/2031 and its implementing legislation. (6) the period of application of the derogation provided for in article 12(2) of directive 2008/90/ec should consequently be extended until 31 december 2022. (7) directive 2008/90/ec should therefore be amended accordingly. (8) the measures provided for in this decision are in accordance with the opinion of the standing committee on plants, animals, food and feed, section propagating material and plants of fruit genera and species, has adopted this decision: article 1 in the first subparagraph of article 12(2) of directive 2008/90/ec, the date 31 december 2018 is replaced by 31 december 2022. article 2 this decision is addressed to the member states. done at brussels, 24 january 2019. for the commission vytenis andriukaitis member of the commission (1) oj l 267, 8.10.2008, p. 8. (2) commission implementing directive 2014/96/eu of 15 october 2014 on the requirements for the labelling, sealing and packaging of fruit plant propagating material and fruit plants intended for fruit production, falling within the scope of council directive 2008/90/ec (oj l 298, 16.10.2014, p. 12). (3) commission implementing directive 2014/97/eu of 15 october 2014 implementing council directive 2008/90/ec as regards the registration of suppliers and of varieties and the common list of varieties (oj l 298, 16.10.2014, p. 16). (4) commission implementing directive 2014/98/eu of 15 october 2014 implementing council directive 2008/90/ec as regards specific requirements for the genus and species of fruit plants referred to in annex i thereto, specific requirements to be met by suppliers and detailed rules concerning official inspections (oj l 298, 16.10.2014, p. 22). (5) regulation (eu) 2016/2031 of the european parliament of the council of 26 october 2016 on protective measures against pests of plants, amending regulations (eu) no 228/2013, (eu) no 652/2014 and (eu) no 1143/2014 of the european parliament and of the council and repealing council directives 69/464/eec, 74/647/eec, 93/85/eec, 98/57/ec, 2000/29/ec, 2006/91/ec and 2007/33/ec (oj l 317, 23.11.2016, p. 4).

name: council decision (eu) 2019/117 of 21 january 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the european union within the joint council established under the economic partnership agreement between the european union and its member states, of the one part, and the sadc epa states, of the other part, as regards the adoption of the rules of procedure for dispute avoidance and settlement and the code of conduct for arbitrators and mediators type: decision subject matter: extra-european organisations; cooperation policy; executive power and public service; politics and public safety; justice; international security; european construction; international affairs date published: 2019-01-28 28.1.2019 en official journal of the european union l 24/12 council decision (eu) 2019/117 of 21 january 2019 on the position to be taken on behalf of the european union within the joint council established under the economic partnership agreement between the european union and its member states, of the one part, and the sadc epa states, of the other part, as regards the adoption of the rules of procedure for dispute avoidance and settlement and the code of conduct for arbitrators and mediators the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular article 207 in conjunction with article 218(9) thereof, having regard to the proposal from the european commission, whereas: (1) the economic partnership agreement between the european union and its member states, of the one part, and the sadc epa states, of the other part (1) (the agreement) was signed by the union and its member states on 10 june 2016. it has been provisionally applied between the union, of the one part, and botswana, lesotho, namibia, eswatini and south africa, of the other part, since 10 october 2016, and between the union and mozambique since 4 february 2018. (2) pursuant to article 102(1) of the agreement, the joint council is to have the power to take decisions in respect of all matters covered by the agreement. (3) pursuant to article 89(1) of the agreement, the joint council is to adopt rules of procedure and a code of conduct for arbitrators and mediators. therefore, the joint council is to adopt, at its first meeting, a decision with regard to the rules of procedure for dispute avoidance and settlement and the code of conduct for arbitrators and mediators acting under part iii of the agreement. (4) it is appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the union's behalf within the joint council concerning the adoption of the rules of procedure for dispute avoidance and settlement and the code of conduct for arbitrators and mediators. (5) the position of the union within the joint council should therefore be based on the attached draft decision, has adopted this decision: article 1 the position to be taken on the union's behalf within the joint council as regards the adoption of the rules of procedure for dispute avoidance and settlement and the code of conduct for arbitrators and mediators shall be based on the draft decision of the joint council attached to this decision. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at brussels, 21 january 2019. for the council the president f. mogherini (1) oj l 250, 16.9.2016, p. 3. draft decision no 2/2019 of the joint council of on the adoption of the rules of procedure for dispute avoidance and settlement and the code of conduct for arbitrators and mediators the joint council, having regard to the economic partnership agreement between the european union and its member states, of the one part, and the sadc epa states, of the other part (the agreement), and in particular article 89(1) and articles 100, 101 and 102 thereof, has adopted this decision: article 1 the rules of procedure for dispute avoidance and settlement, as set out in annex i to this decision, are hereby adopted. article 2 the code of conduct for arbitrators and mediators, as set out in annex ii to this decision, is hereby adopted. article 3 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at on for the joint council minister for trade of eu representative annex i rules of procedure for dispute avoidance and settlement article 1 definitions in these rules of procedure and in accordance with part iii (dispute avoidance and settlement) of the agreement: (a) administrative staff, in respect of an arbitrator, means individuals under the direction and control of an arbitrator, other than assistants; (b) adviser means an individual retained by a party to advise or assist that party in connection with the arbitration proceedings; (c) the agreement means the economic partnership agreement between the european union and its member states, of the one part, and the sadc epa states, of the other part, signed on 10 june 2016; (d) arbitrator means a member of the arbitration panel; (e) arbitration panel means a panel established under article 80 of the agreement; (f) assistant means an individual who, under the terms of appointment and under the direction and control of an arbitrator, conducts research or provides assistance to that arbitrator; (g) complaining party means any party that requests the establishment of an arbitration panel under article 80 of the agreement; (h) day means a calendar day; (i) party means a party to the dispute; (j) party complained against means the party that is alleged to be in violation of the provisions covered under article 76 of the agreement; and (k) representative of a party means an employee or any individual appointed by a government department, agencyf or any other public entity of a party who represents the party for the purposes of a dispute under the agreement. article 2 notifications 1. any request, notice, written submission or other document of the arbitration panel shall be sent to both parties at the same time. any request, notice, written submission or other document of a party which is addressed to the arbitration panel shall be copied to the other party at the same time. any request, notice, written submission or other document of a party which is addressed to the other party shall be copied to the arbitration panel at the same time, where appropriate. 2. any notification referred to in paragraph 1 shall be made by email or, where appropriate, any other means of telecommunication that provide a record of the sending thereof. unless proven otherwise, such notification shall be deemed to be delivered on the date of its sending. 3. all notifications shall be addressed to the directorate-general for trade of the european commission of the european union and to the sadc epa states coordinator, provided for in article 105 of the agreement. 4. minor errors of a clerical nature in a request, notice, written submission or other document related to the arbitration panel proceedings may be corrected by delivery of a new document clearly indicating the changes. 5. if the last day for delivery of a document falls on a public holiday of the european commission or of the sadc epa state or states concerned, the document shall be deemed delivered on the next business day. 6. depending on the nature of the dispute, all requests and notifications addressed to the trade and development committee shall also be copied to the other relevant subcommittees established under the agreement. article 3 appointment of arbitrators 1. if, pursuant to article 80 of the agreement, an arbitrator is selected by lot, the chairperson of the trade and development committee shall promptly inform the parties of the date, time and venue of the lot. 2. the parties may be present during the lot, and the lot shall be carried out with the party or parties that are present. 3. the chairperson of the trade and development committee shall notify, in writing, each individual who has been selected to serve as an arbitrator of his or her appointment. each individual shall confirm his or her availability to both parties within five days of the date on which he or she was informed of his or her appointment. 4. if the list referred to in article 94 of the agreement has not been established or does not contain sufficient names at the time a request is made pursuant to article 80(3) of the agreement, the arbitrators shall be drawn by lot from the individuals who have been formally proposed by one or both of the parties. article 4 organisational meeting 1. unless the parties agree otherwise, they shall meet the arbitration panel within 10 days of its establishment in order to determine such matters as the parties or the arbitration panel deem appropriate, including: (a) the remuneration and expenses to be paid to the arbitrators, in accordance with world trade organization (wto) standards; (b) the remuneration to be paid to assistant(s), the total amount of which shall not exceed 50 % of the remuneration paid to the arbitrator(s); or (c) the timetable of the proceedings. 2. arbitrators and representatives of the parties may take part in the meeting referred to in paragraph 1 via telephone or video conference. article 5 terms of reference 1. unless the parties agree otherwise, within seven days of the date of establishment of the arbitration panel, the terms of reference of the arbitration panel shall be: (a) to examine, in the light of the relevant provisions of the agreement cited by the parties, the matter referred to in the request for the establishment of the arbitration panel; (b) to make findings on the conformity of the measure at issue with the provisions covered under article 76 of the agreement; and (c) to deliver a report in accordance with articles 81 and 82 of the agreement. 2. if the parties agree on other terms of reference, they shall notify the agreed terms of reference to the arbitration panel within the time period set out in paragraph 1. article 6 written submissions the complaining party shall deliver its written submission no later than 20 days after the date of establishment of the arbitration panel. the party complained against shall deliver its written submission no later than 20 days after the date of delivery of the written submission of the complaining party. article 7 operation of the arbitration panel 1. the chairperson of the arbitration panel shall preside at all its meetings. the arbitration panel may delegate to the chairperson the authority to make administrative and procedural decisions. 2. unless otherwise provided in part iii of the agreement or in these rules of procedure, the arbitration panel may conduct its activities by any means, including telephone, facsimile transmissions or computer links. 3. only arbitrators may take part in the deliberations of the arbitration panel, but the arbitration panel may permit arbitrators' assistants to be present at its deliberations. 4. the drafting of any decision or report shall remain the exclusive responsibility of the arbitration panel and shall not be delegated. 5. where a procedural question arises that is not covered by part iii of the agreement and the annexes thereto, the arbitration panel, after consulting the parties, may adopt an appropriate procedure that is compatible with those provisions. 6. when the arbitration panel considers that there is a need to change any of the time periods for the proceedings other than the time periods set out in part iii of the agreement or to make any other procedural or administrative adjustment, it shall inform the parties, in writing and after consulting them, of the reasons for the change or adjustment and of the new time period or adjustment needed. article 8 replacement 1. if an arbitrator is unable to participate in the proceedings, withdraws or needs to be replaced, a replacement shall be selected in accordance with article 80(3) of the agreement. 2. when a party considers that an arbitrator does not comply with the requirements of annex ii (code of conduct for arbitrators and mediators) and for this reason should be replaced, that party shall notify the other party within 15 days of the date on which it obtained sufficient evidence of the arbitrator's alleged failure to comply with the requirements of that annex. 3. the parties shall consult one another within 15 days of the notification to the other party. 4. the parties shall inform the arbitrator of his or her alleged non-compliance and may request the arbitrator to take steps to remedy the alleged non-compliance. they may also, if they so agree, remove the arbitrator and select a new arbitrator in accordance with article 80 of the agreement. 5. if the parties fail to agree on the need to replace the arbitrator, other than the chairperson of the arbitration panel, either party may request that this matter be referred to the chairperson of the arbitration panel, whose decision shall be final. 6. if the chairperson of the arbitration panel finds that the arbitrator does not comply with the requirements of annex ii (code of conduct for arbitrators and mediators), the new arbitrator shall be selected in accordance with article 80 of the agreement. 7. if the parties fail to agree on the need to replace the chairperson, either party may request that this matter be referred to one of the remaining members of the list of individuals established under article 94 of the agreement selected to act as chairperson of the arbitration panel. his or her name shall be drawn by lot by the chairperson of the trade and development committee. the individual so selected shall make a decision as to whether the chairperson complies with the requirements of annex ii (code of conduct for arbitrators and mediators). that decision shall be final. if the decision is that the chairperson does not comply with the requirements of annex ii (code of conduct for arbitrators and mediators), the new chairperson shall be selected in accordance with article 80 of the agreement. article 9 hearings 1. based upon the timetable determined pursuant to point (c) of article 4(1), after consulting with the parties and the other arbitrators, the chairperson of the arbitration panel shall notify the parties of the date, time and venue of the hearing. this information shall be made publicly available by the party in whose territory the hearing takes place, unless the hearing is closed to the public. 2. unless the parties agree otherwise, the hearing shall be held in brussels if the complaining party is an sadc epa state or the southern african customs union (sacu), as the case may be, and in the territories of the sadc epa states if the complaining party is the european union. if the dispute concerns a measure maintained by an sadc epa state, the hearing shall take place in the territory of that state, unless that state gives written notice to the arbitration panel within 10 days of its establishment that another venue should be used. 3. the party complained against shall bear the expenses derived from the logistical administration of the hearing, including the costs relating to renting the venue for the hearing. such costs shall not include any costs for translation or interpretation, or any costs associated with or payable to the advisers, the arbitrators or the arbitrators' administrative staff or assistant(s). 4. the arbitration panel may convene additional hearings if the parties so agree. 5. all arbitrators shall be present during the entirety of the hearing. 6. unless the parties agree otherwise, the following persons may attend the hearing, irrespective of whether the hearing is open to the public or not: (a) representatives of a party; (b) advisers; (c) assistants and administrative staff; (d) interpreters, translators and court reporters of the arbitration panel; and (e) experts, as decided by the arbitration panel pursuant to article 90 of the agreement. 7. no later than seven days before the date of a hearing, each party shall deliver to the arbitration panel and to the other party a list of the names of persons who will make oral arguments or presentations at the hearing on behalf of that party and of other representatives and advisers who will be attending the hearing. 8. pursuant to article 89(2) of the agreement, the hearings of the arbitration panel shall be open to the public, unless the arbitration panel decides otherwise on its own motion or at the request of the parties. 9. the arbitration panel shall, in consultation with the parties, decide on appropriate logistical arrangements and procedures to ensure that hearings which are open are managed in an effective way. these procedures could include the use of live web-broadcasting or of closed-circuit television. 10. the arbitration panel shall conduct the hearing in the following manner, ensuring that the complaining party and the party complained against are afforded equal time in both argument and rebuttal argument: argument (a) argument of the complaining party; (b) argument of the party complained against. rebuttal argument (a) reply of the complaining party; (b) counter-reply of the party complained against. 11. the arbitration panel may direct questions to either party at any time during the hearing. 12. the arbitration panel shall arrange for a transcript of the hearing to be prepared and delivered to the parties within a reasonable amount of time after the hearing. the parties may comment on the transcript, and the arbitration panel may consider those comments. 13. each party may deliver a supplementary written submission concerning any matter that arose during the hearing within 10 days of the date of the hearing. article 10 questions in writing 1. the arbitration panel may at any time during the proceedings submit questions in writing to one or both parties. any questions submitted to one party shall be copied to the other party. 2. each party shall provide the other party with a copy of its responses to the questions submitted by the arbitration panel. the other party shall have an opportunity to provide comments in writing on the party's responses within seven days of the delivery of that copy. article 11 confidentiality 1. each party and the arbitration panel shall treat as confidential any information submitted by the other party to the arbitration panel that the other party has designated as such. when a party submits to the arbitration panel a written submission which contains confidential information, it shall also provide, within 15 days, a submission without the confidential information and which can be disclosed to the public. 2. nothing in these rules of procedure shall preclude a party from disclosing statements of its own positions to the public to the extent that, when making reference to information submitted by the other party, it does not disclose any information designated by the other party as confidential. 3. the arbitration panel shall meet in closed session when the submission and arguments of a party contains business confidential information. the parties shall maintain the confidentiality of the arbitration panel hearings when the hearings are held in closed session. article 12 ex parte contacts 1. the arbitration panel shall not meet or communicate with a party in the absence of the other party. 2. an arbitrator shall not discuss any aspect of the subject matter of the proceedings with one or both of the parties in the absence of the other arbitrators. article 13 amicus curiae submissions 1. unless the parties agree otherwise within five days of the date of the establishment of the arbitration panel, the arbitration panel may receive unsolicited written submissions from a natural person of a party or a legal person established in the territory of a party that is independent from the governments of the parties, provided that they: (a) are received by the arbitration panel within 10 days of the date of the establishment of the arbitration panel; (b) are directly relevant to a factual or a legal issue under consideration by the arbitration panel; (c) contain a description of the person making the submission, including for a natural person his or her nationality and for a legal person its place of establishment, the nature of its activities, its legal status, its general objectives and its source of financing; (d) specify the nature of the interest that the person has in the arbitration panel proceedings; and (e) are drafted in the languages chosen by the parties in accordance with article 15(1) and (2) of these rules of procedure. 2. the submissions shall be delivered to the parties for their comments. the parties may submit comments, within 10 days of the delivery, to the arbitration panel. 3. the arbitration panel shall list in its report all the submissions it has received pursuant to paragraph 1 of this article. the arbitration panel shall not be obliged to address in its report the arguments made in such submissions; however, if it does, it shall also take into account any comments made by the parties pursuant to paragraph 2 of this article. article 14 urgent cases in cases of urgency referred to in part iii of the agreement, the arbitration panel, after consulting the parties, shall adjust, as appropriate, the time periods referred to in these rules of procedure. the arbitration panel shall notify the parties of those adjustments. article 15 translation and interpretation 1. during the consultations referred to in article 77 of the agreement, and no later than the meeting referred to in article 4(1) of these rules of procedure, the parties shall endeavour to agree on a common working language for the proceedings before the arbitration panel. 2. if the parties are unable to agree on a common working language, the rules set out in article 91(2) of the agreement shall apply. 3. the party complained against shall arrange for the interpretation of oral submissions into the languages chosen by the parties. 4. arbitration panel reports and decisions shall be issued in the language or languages chosen by the parties. if the parties have not agreed on a common working language, the interim and final report of the arbitration panel shall be issued in one of the working languages of the wto. 5. any party may provide comments on the accuracy of the translation of any translated version of a document drawn up in accordance with these rules of procedure. 6. each party shall bear the costs of the translation of its written submissions. any costs incurred for translation of a ruling shall be borne equally by the parties. article 16 other procedures the time periods laid down in these rules of procedure shall be adjusted in line with the special time periods provided for the adoption of a report or decision by the arbitration panel in the proceedings under articles 84, 85, 86 and 87 of the agreement. annex ii code of conduct for arbitrators and mediators article 1 definitions in this code of conduct: (a) administrative staff means, in respect of an arbitrator, individuals under the direction and control of an arbitrator, other than assistants; (b) assistant means an individual who, under the terms of appointment and under the direction and control of an arbitrator, conducts research or provides assistance to that arbitrator; (c) candidate means an individual whose name is on the list of arbitrators referred to in article 94 of the agreement and who is under consideration for selection as an arbitrator under article 80 of the agreement; (d) mediator means an individual who has been selected as mediator in accordance with article 78 of the agreement; (e) member or arbitrator means a member of an arbitration panel established under article 80 of the agreement. article 2 governing principles 1. in order to preserve the integrity and impartiality of the dispute settlement mechanism each candidate and arbitrator shall: (a) get acquainted with this code of conduct; (b) be independent and impartial; (c) avoid direct or indirect conflicts of interest; (d) avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety or bias; (e) observe high standards of conduct; and (f) not be influenced by self-interest, outside pressure, political considerations, public clamour, loyalty to a party or fear of criticism. 2. an arbitrator shall not, directly or indirectly, incur any obligation or accept any benefit that would in any way interfere, or appear to interfere, with the proper performance of his or her duties. 3. an arbitrator shall not use his or her position on the arbitration panel to advance any personal or private interests. an arbitrator shall avoid actions that may create the impression that others are in a special position to influence him or her. 4. an arbitrator shall not allow past or existing financial, business, professional, personal or social relationships or responsibilities to influence his or her conduct or judgement. 5. an arbitrator shall avoid entering into any relationship or acquiring any financial interest that is likely to affect his or her impartiality or that might reasonably create an appearance of impropriety or bias. 6. an arbitrator shall exercise his or her position without accepting or seeking instructions from any government, any international governmental organisation or international non-governmental organisation or any private source, and shall not have intervened in any previous stage of the dispute assigned to them. article 3 disclosure obligations 1. prior to the acceptance of his or her appointment as an arbitrator under article 80 of the agreement, a candidate requested to serve as an arbitrator shall disclose any interest, relationship or matter that is likely to affect his or her independence or impartiality or that might reasonably create an appearance of impropriety or bias in the proceedings. 2. to this end, a candidate shall make all reasonable efforts to become aware of any such interests, relationships and matters, including financial interests, professional interests, or employment or family interests. 3. the disclosure obligation under paragraph 1 is a continuing duty which requires an arbitrator to disclose any such interests, relationships or matters that may arise during any stage of the proceedings. 4. a candidate or an arbitrator shall communicate to the trade and development committee for consideration by the parties any matters concerning actual or potential violations of this code of conduct as soon as he or she becomes aware of them. article 4 duties of arbitrators 1. upon acceptance of his or her appointment, an arbitrator shall be available to perform and shall perform his or her duties thoroughly and expeditiously throughout the proceedings, and with fairness and diligence. 2. an arbitrator shall consider only the issues raised in the proceedings and necessary for a decision and shall not delegate this duty to any other person. 3. an arbitrator shall take all appropriate steps to ensure that his or her assistants and administrative staff are aware of, and comply with, the obligations incurred by arbitrators under articles 2, 3, 4 and 6 of this code of conduct. article 5 obligations of former arbitrators 1. each former arbitrator shall avoid actions that may create the appearance that he or she was biased in carrying out the duties or derived advantage from the decision of the arbitration panel. 2. each former arbitrator shall comply with the obligations set out in article 6 of this code of conduct. article 6 confidentiality 1. an arbitrator shall not, at any time, disclose any non-public information concerning the proceedings or acquired during the proceedings for which he or she has been appointed. an arbitrator shall not, in any case, disclose or use such information to gain personal advantage or advantage for others or to adversely affect the interest of others. 2. an arbitrator shall not disclose a decision of the arbitration panel or parts thereof prior to its publication. 3. an arbitrator shall not, at any time, disclose the deliberations of an arbitration panel, or any arbitrator's view, or make any statements on the proceedings for which he or she has been appointed or on the issues in dispute in the proceedings. article 7 expenses each arbitrator shall keep a record and render a final account of the time devoted to the proceedings and of his or her expenses, as well as the time and expenses of his or her assistants and administrative staff. article 8 mediators this code of conduct shall apply to mediators, mutatis mutandis.

name: commission decision (eu) 2019/115 of 10 july 2018 on the measures sa.37977 (2016/c) (ex 2016/nn) implemented by spain for sociedad estatal de correos y tel grafos, s.a. (notified under document c(2018) 4233) (text with eea relevance.) type: decision subject matter: taxation; electoral procedure and voting; communications; consumption; economic policy; europe; business organisation; competition date published: 2019-01-25 25.1.2019 en official journal of the european union l 23/41 commission decision (eu) 2019/115 of 10 july 2018 on the measures sa.37977 (2016/c) (ex 2016/nn) implemented by spain for sociedad estatal de correos y tel grafos, s.a. (notified under document c(2018) 4233) (only the spanish text is authentic) (text with eea relevance) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular the first subparagraph of article 108(2) thereof, having regard to the agreement on the european economic area, and in particular article 62(1)(a), having called on interested parties to submit their comments pursuant to the provision(s) cited above (1) and having regard to their comments, whereas: 1. procedure (1) on 9 december 2013 and 10 april 2014, the commission received two anonymous complaints against the spanish state as regards the alleged granting of unlawful and incompatible aid to sociedad estatal correos y tel grafos, s.a. (hereinafter correos). both complaints raised the following issues concerning correos: (i) alleged overcompensation granted to correos for the delivery of the uso since 1998, (ii) alleged incompatible tax exemptions granted to correos, and (iii) alleged unpaid social security contributions for civil servants employed by correos. (2) on 14 february 2014, 26 february 2014 and 15 july 2014, the commission forwarded the non-confidential versions of the two complaints to the spanish authorities. (3) on 11 april 2014 and 18 september 2014, the spanish authorities responded to those complaints. (4) on 10 july 2014, 22 october 2014 and 4 december 2015 the commission requested further information from the spanish authorities. (5) the spanish authorities responded to those requests on 7 august 2014, 19 december 2014, 19 january 2015 and 21 december 2015 respectively. (6) by letter dated 11 february 2016, the commission informed spain that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in article 108(2) of the treaty in respect of several measures granted to correos. the commission decision to initiate the procedure (hereinafter the 2016 opening decision) was published in the official journal of the european union (2). (7) the commission received first comments from spain on the opening decision by letter dated 21 april 2016. (8) the commission received comments from correos on the opening decision by letter dated 11 may 2016. (9) the commission received comments from a third party by letter dated 12 may 2016. (10) the commission forwarded the comments received to spain on 8 june 2016. (11) spain provided its comments on the comments from third parties by letter dated 6 july 2016. (12) in the course of the proceedings the commission received additional comments from spain on 24 october 2017 and 23 may 2018. (13) the commission received additional observations from a former competitor of correos, unipost by letter dated 20 march 2018. 2. detailed description of the aid 2.1. the spanish postal market (14) prior to spain's accession to the european economic community (eec) in 1986, postal services in spain were operated by the general administration. the decree 1113/1960 of 9 may 1960 on the postal order, implemented by the postal services regulation, adopted by means of decree no 1653/1964 of 14 may 1964, defined the postal service and entrusted its provision to the directorate-general of correos y tel grafos. the adoption of the postal order and its implementing regulation marked the start of the liberalisation of the spanish postal market. whereas correos y tel grafos monopoly was restricted to interurban and international letters and postcards, urban mail and parcel services were fully liberalised. in the 1970s the first large private operators entered the spanish postal market. (15) following spain's accession to the eec, there was a gradual liberalisation of postal services between 1998 and 2010 based on the european union postal directives. more specifically, directive 97/67/ec of the european parliament and of the council (3) was transposed into national law in 1998 by means of law 24/1998 of 13 july 1998 on the universal postal service and the liberalisation of postal services (the 1998 postal law), which for the first time entrusted correos with the universal service obligation (4) (uso). the law provided for a reduced list of uso services (5) which were reserved for correos as uso provider (the reserved area), whereas all other postal services were liberalised (non-reserved area). (16) the liberalisation of postal services in spain continued with the transposition into spanish law of directive 2002/39/ec of the european parliament and of the council (6), by law 53/2002 of 30 december 2002 on tax, administrative and social measures, which amended the aforementioned 1998 postal law and further reduced the scope of the reserved area. (17) in 2010 the postal sector was fully liberalised by law 43/2010 of 30 december 2010 on the universal postal service, users' rights and the postal market (the 2010 postal law) which transposed directive 2008/6/ec of the european parliament and of the council (7) into spanish law. the 2010 postal law redefined the scope of the uso (e.g. the money order service was excluded from the uso) and abolished the reserved area. 2.2. the beneficiary 2.2.1. correos (18) correos is a wholly state-owned company which is the parent company of the grupo correos, with sociedad estatal (sepi) as the sole shareholder. sepi is a holding company for the state's participations in undertakings. (19) correos offers postal services, including universal services, courier services and other services (e.g. services related to postal services and associated activities, including money transfer operations, philately, etc.). in 2016, correos had a turnover of approximately eur 1 761 million, sent 2 774 million postal items (including parcels) and employed 49 785 workers. (20) correos is the largest provider of postal services in spain, with 8 787 postal points of contact in 2016. it is the market leader in the spanish postal sector with the biggest market share of the spanish postal services market, except in parcel services. until 2017, unipost s.a. was the main competitor of correos in the spanish postal market, however the company underwent financial difficulties and entered into liquidation on 19 february 2018. other european postal operators (i.e. deutsche post, tnt, la poste, ups, ctt correios portugal and royal mail) hold significant market shares in parcel services. 2.2.2. the legal framework applicable to correos (21) in spain, the state has directly administered the postal service since 1716. correos was part of the public administration, being embedded within different ministries like the ministry of interior and subsequently the ministry of transport and communications. (22) the autonomous body correos y tel grafos was created by the state general budget law 31/1990 of 27 december 1990. the autonomous body correos y tel grafos was set up in 1992, attached to the ministry of transport, tourism and communications. (23) correos y tel grafos became a public business entity attached to the ministry of fomento under law 6/1997 of 14 april 1997 on the organisation and funtioning of the state general administration. (24) law 14/2000 of 29 december 2000, on fiscal, administrative and social measures, adopted the legal framework for the sociedad estatal correos y tel grafos, s.a., the company being set up in june 2001. on 5 june 2012 all the companies belonging to the correos group (i.e. correos and its subsidiaries correos express, nexea and correos telecom) were incorporated into the sepi holding, which became their sole shareholder. 2.3. description of public measures in favour of correos 2.3.1. the uso compensations granted to correos (25) in 1998, correos was entrusted with the uso by the 1998 postal law. as compensation for delivering the uso, correos received public funding from 1998 to 2010. subsequently, the 2010 postal law entrusted correos with the provision of the uso for a period of 15 years starting on 1 january 2011. 2.3.1.1. the uso compensations granted under the 1998 postal law (26) from 11 march 2000, the 1998 postal law was complemented with a plan de prestaci n (the 2000 plan de prestaci n) that sets out the compensation mechanism to estimate correos' net cost incurred in relation to the fulfilment of its obligation as universal service provider (usp) and quality criteria for the provision of the uso. (27) from 2000 to 2010, the uso compensation to correos was granted on the basis of a methodology developed by the spanish authorities (the spanish methodology), which is detailed in the 2000 plan de prestaci n. moreover, the 2000 plan de prestaci n establishes that correos should implement analytical accounting with separation of accounts as provided in article 29 of the 1998 postal law. (28) the spanish methodology to estimate the net cost of the unfair burden of the uso, consisted of the following steps: (a) step 1: determining the unit revenue and costs of every product/service and every cost centre according to the cost accounting information of correos. for any given product/service, those cost centres where the unit costs are higher than the unit revenue stand as loss-making. the other cost centres, where unit revenue is higher than unit costs, stand as profit-making. (b) step 2: for each reserved service (rsi) assessing which cost centres are loss-making/profit-making for the delivery of that service and calculating the aggregate loss/profit for the delivery of that service (loss/profit rsi). the net cost for the reserved services is calculated as the difference between the sum of loss rsi and the sum of profit rsi. (c) step 3: for each non-reserved service (nrsi) assessing which cost centres are loss-making for the delivery of that service and calculating the aggregate loss of these centres for the delivery of that service (loss nrsi). the net cost for the non-reserved services is calculated as the sum of loss nrsi (d) step 4: the uso compensation covers the net cost of the reserved and non-reserved services calculated according to steps 2 and 3. (29) table 1 shows the compensations that were granted to correos for the delivery of the uso during the 2004-2010 period and that were calculated using the spanish methodology: table 1 uso compensations granted to correos (eur million) 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 net cost rsi 46,171 40,435 39,558 80,823 101,783 176,559 152,521 net cost nrsi 44,859 47,294 55,199 39,441 40,863 45,919 43,812 uso compensation 91,030 87,729 94,757 120,264 142,646 222,478 196,333 2.3.1.2. the uso compensations under the 2010 postal law (30) the 1998 postal law was superseded by the 2010 postal law, which entered into force on 1 january 2011. the 2010 postal law entrusted correos with the provision of the uso for a period of 15 years starting on the entry into force of the law (i.e. until 1 january 2026). (31) article 27 and 28 of 2010 postal law provides that the uso provider is allowed to receive compensation up to the net cost incurred in discharging its obligations. the net cost should be calculated according to the net avoided cost method (hereinafter nac methodology) as the difference between the net cost for the usp of operating with the uso and the net cost of the usp operating without the uso. the calculation shall take into account all other relevant elements, including any intangible and market benefits which accrue to a postal service provider designated to provide the universal service, the entitlement to a reasonable profit and incentives for cost efficiency in light of annex 1 of directive 2008/6/ec. (32) as provided in article 22(3) and article 27(2)(b) of the 2010 postal law, the nac methodology described in recital 31 should be developed in a new plan de prestaci n. however, up to this date, such a new plan de prestaci n has not yet been adopted. therefore, since 2011 there has been no methodology in place to estimate the net cost of the uso. (33) at this stage, according to the spanish authorities, correos has not formally received any uso compensation since 2011 although it has benefited from advance payments on a provisional basis for the years 2011-2017. the actual net cost corresponding to those years remains to be calculated once the new plan de prestaci n is adopted and the nac methodology defined. the commission will assess the uso compensations under the 2010 postal law in another decision. 2.3.2. tax exemptions granted to correos (34) according to article 19(1)(b) of the 1998 postal law, the usp would benefit from the exemption from all levying taxes on its services in the reserved area, except for the corporate tax. article 22(2) of the 2010 postal law maintained this tax exemption and extended it to the entire uso. (35) according to the spanish authorities, the only tax that could possibly fall within the scope of this exemption on top of vat would be the tax on economic activities (impuesto de actividades econ micas, hereinafter iae) since it is a tax levied upon the performance of an economic activity and is linked to the provision of the uso. other taxes like the property transfer tax, construction tax, tax on the increase in the value of urban land and tax on motor vehicles do not fall within the scope of the exemption since they are not linked to the economic activity of the provision of the uso. (36) the spanish authorities have explained that correos has been partially exempted from the iae tax as it only pays 50 % of the normal tax amount. (37) as regards the real estate tax (impuesto sobre bienes inmuebles, hereinafter ibi), the spanish authorities explained that it is a tax that is not levied upon the provision of the uso or other postal services, but is levied on the value of real estate. therefore, it would be outside of the scope of the two postal laws. however, between 2008 and 2013 correos lodged several claims based on its interpretation of article 19(1)(b) of the 1998 postal law, and article 22(2) of the 2010 postal law, in which it stated that it should be exempted from the ibi for a series of offices in different municipalities. following correos' request for ibi exemption, several local administrations and courts ruled in favour of correos thereby granting it a refund of taxes previously paid. 2.3.2.1. the tax exemption on real estate tax (ibi) (38) the ibi is a local tax in the spanish tax system which is regulated by royal legislative decree 2/2004 of 5 march 2004. according to article 60 of that royal legislative decree, this tax is an objective direct tax imposed on the value of property under the terms laid down in this royal legislative decree. the taxable event of the ibi is entitlement to any of the rights laid down in article 61 of royal legislative decree 2/2004 over rural and urban properties and over property with special characteristics. the ibi is not imposed on any activity, but on the value of property. (39) between 2008 and 2013, based on its interpretation of article 19(1)(b) of the 1998 postal law, and article 22(2) of the 2010 postal law, correos introduced several claims in which it stated that it should be exempted from the ibi under the postal laws for a series of offices in different municipalities. following correos' request for ibi exemption, several administrations and local courts ruled in favour of correos. according to the spanish authorities, the tax refunds effectively granted to correos amount to eur 752 840,50. (40) these courts' interpretations of both the 1998 and the 2010 postal laws that allowed the usp to be exempted from the ibi were rejected by the spanish supreme court in 2013 following a cassation appeal from the local authorities of the province of huesca. the supreme court considered in its judgment that article 22(2) of the 2010 postal law should be interpreted restrictively. according to the supreme court, the tax exemptions laid down in that article can only be applied to taxes imposed on activities directly linked to the provision of the uso, and, therefore, could not apply to the ibi, which is a direct tax imposed on the value of property. (41) the ibi exemptions granted to correos between 2008 and 2013 were never recovered. indeed, under the spanish national law system the cassation appeal in favour of law (recurso de casaci n en inter s de ley) has an extraordinary and subsidiary character which aims exclusively to unifying legal doctrine and, therefore, cannot have an effect on the matter referred to in the appeal (i.e. for the case at hand, it does not have the power to annul the rulings and decisions on the tax exemptions). 2.3.2.2. the exemption from the tax on economic activities (iae) (42) the iae was laid down in law 39/1988 of 28 december 1988, substituted by royal legislative decree 2/2004 of 5 march 2004. it follows from article 78 of this royal legislative decree that undertakings that carry out economic, business, professional or artistic activities should be subject to the tax. (43) according to article 78 of royal legislative decree 2/2004, iae is an objective direct tax for which the taxable event is the performance, in the national territory, of economic, business, professional or artistic activities, whether or not performed in a specific place and whether or not specified in the tax rates. (44) the iae tariffs were laid down in royal legislative decree 1175/1990 of 28 of september. they classify the postal activity under group 847 postal services and telecommunications from 1999 onwards. this group includes the provision of postal services consisting of the collection, admission, classification, treatment, transportation, distribution and delivery of items of mail in all its forms. however, note 3 to tariff group 847 states that the public business entity of correos is entitled to pay only 50 % of the tax amount laid down for this group. according to the spanish authorities, this means that correos has benefited from an exemption of eur 8 113,66 per year since 2004. the spanish authorities have confirmed that correos continues to benefit from the partial tax exemption laid down in note 3 to tariff group 847. 2.3.3. the three capital increases granted in 2004, 2005 and 2006 (45) during the period under analysis, correos benefited from three capital increases amounting in total eur 48 081 000: (a) a capital increase of eur 16 027 000 granted on 13 december 2004; (b) a capital increase of eur 16 027 000 granted on 25 november 2005; (c) a capital increase of eur 16 027 000 granted on 24 november 2006. (46) according to the spanish authorities, those capital increases were part of correos' strategic business plan for the period 2004-2006 in order to compensate for the slowing down of the postal market. the basic strategic lines of such business plan were: (a) ensuring the future sustainability of the postal business on the basis of efficiency; (b) strengthening growth businesses in the medium term by promoting financial services and parcels as correos' main focuses objectives for growth; (c) enlarging the portfolio of future growth options by developing the management of databases, the mailroom and the e-business; (d) modernising correos' capacities and adapting the management model to the current market context, promoting diversification. 2.3.4. the compensation granted to correos for the distribution of electoral material (47) organic law 5/1985 of 19 june 1985 on the general electoral system (loreg), and its implementing legislation, regulate the electoral procedure in spain, recognising the right to vote either in person or via postal ballot. (48) article 22 of the 1998 postal law and article 22(5) of the 2010 postal law provide that the state may impose certain obligations on the designated usp in the framework of electoral processes. the same article 22(5) of the 2010 postal law provides that the imposition of additional public service obligations shall be compensated. (49) pursuant to the first additional provision of the 2010 postal law, correos is the designated usp and is entrusted with the obligation to provide several services in the context of the different spanish elections (i.e. state, regional, european and municipal elections). (50) correos' public service obligations in relation to the organization of electoral processes in spain concern the following: (a) the handling of postal ballots (including the provision, acceptance, sending and delivery by certified and urgent mail) in the context of: (1) postal voting for electors resident in spain; (2) postal voting for absentee resident voters; (3) postal voting for voters who are temporarily abroad; (4) postal voting for on-board personnel; (5) voting for on-board personnel from the armed forces or in exceptional situations linked to national defence; and (6) postal voting for prison inmates. (b) the handling of postal election material sent out by political candidates: admission and subsequent distribution of election propaganda items issued by political candidates for a symbolic price per item sent (eur 0,006). (c) the handling of other postal items sent by the electoral roll office (such as voter registration cards, reference electoral rolls for local councils, etc.). (d) the collection of electoral documentation at the election committee once counting is complete. this includes the collection, safekeeping and subsequent delivery of the envelope that contains the report and pertinent documentation for each committee, to the pertinent electoral board. (51) the spanish authorities explained that given the time constraints related to the electoral process, correos is obliged to prioritize the activities in recital 50 in comparison with other postal activities. the high number of items that need to be distributed, their high concentration on a few days, and the requirement to deliver most documents in person (in case of certified mail, such as the postal ballots) entail significant additional efforts. as a result, correos has to temporarily reinforce its staff and other resources (e.g. transport, security, etc.). (52) correos has received compensations (see table 2) for its different obligations in regard to the organisation of elections since 2004 table 2 amounts of compensation granted to correos for organisation of elections (eur) year election scope compensation for distribution of election material 2004 national 27 182 926 2005 regional 3 670 281 2006 regional 4 528 376 2007 national/regional 19 536 604 2008 national/regional 19 609 632 2009 national/regional 14 603 021 2010 regional 4 620 588 2011 national/regional 40 092 858 2012 regional 14 268 978 total 148 113 264 3. grounds for initiating the formal investigation procedure (53) the commission decided to initiate the formal investigation procedure because of its serious doubts regarding the compatibility of several measures granted to correos since 2004: (a) the uso compensations granted to correos under the 1998 postal law, (b) the ibi exemption and iae partial exemption, (c) the three capital increases granted in 2004, 2005 and 2006, (d) and the compensation granted to correos for the distribution of electoral material. (54) the commission notably expressed doubts on: (a) the level of compensation received by correos for the delivery of the uso between 2004 and 2010 that it considered prima facie state aid and the potentiality of an overcompensation of the operator, (b) the compatibility or existing aid character of the ibi exemption and iae partial exemption that it considered prima facie to both constitute state aid. (c) the compliance of the capital injections granted in 2004, 2005 and 2006 with the market economy investor principle (hereinafter meip). (d) the compatibility or existing aid character of the compensation granted to correos for the distribution of electoral material that it considered prima facie state aid. 4. comments from interested parties (55) the commission received comments from two interested parties, namely the alleged beneficiary of the aid measures correos and another third party (hereinafter the anonymous third party) which requested that its identity is kept confidential. 4.1. comments from correos 4.1.1. the compensation for the provision of the uso does not constitute incompatible state aid (56) according to correos, the uso compensation granted to the company for the period 2004-2010 does not constitute state aid. in particular, correos considers that compensation does not constitute an advantage since it fulfills the four criteria laid down in case c-280/00 (the altmark criteria) (8). correos contests the conclusion reached in the opening decision that the uso compensation does not comply with the third and fourth altmark criteria. (57) as regards the third altmark criterion, correos argues that it requires that the compensation received for the provision of a public service should not exceed the net cost, which is the difference between costs and revenues plus a reasonable profit. correos considers that the third altmark criterion is inextricably linked to the compatibility analysis of the services of general economic interest, according to the communication of the commission (2012 sgei framework) (9). in particular, correos argues that the compensation that it received for the provision of the uso complies with the net avoided cost (hereinafter nac) methodology contained in paragraph 27 of the 2012 sgei framework and should thereby be considered to comply with the third altmark criterion. (58) correos explains that the spanish methodology used to determine the compensation of correos is based on the report which was commissioned to the consultancy company national economic research associates by the commission (nera report) (10). according to correos, the compensation methodology contained in the nera report is a valid implementation of the nac methodology. (59) moreover, correos considers that the fulfilment of the third altmark criterion is covered by the principle of legitimate expectations. according to correos, the commission created legitimate expectations by means of publishing the nera report, which recognized the nac methodology as a valid method for calculating the compensation for the provision of the uso. (60) according to correos it is irrelevant for the compliance with the third altmark criteria that the nac methodology was not in place until the entry into force of the 2012 sgei framework. (61) correos also considers that the uso compensations granted to correos comply with the fourth altmark criteria. in the absence of a public procurement procedure, the level of compensation received would be adequate on the basis of an analysis of the costs, which a typical well-run undertaking within the same sector would incur, taking into account the receipts and a reasonable profit from discharging the public service obligation. (62) according to correos, the frontier economics study submitted by spain demonstrates that the costs incurred by correos are below those incurred by a typical undertaking of the postal sector. correos contests the doubts raised by the commission as regards the conclusions reached in the frontier economics report: (a) first, the commission did not conclude in its state aid decisions that the uso providers in greece and italy were not cost inefficient and therefore the inclusion of these postal operators in the sample of companies considered by frontier econonomics to demonstrate the cost efficiency of correos cannot be considered problematic. (b) second, the fact that the frontier economics study was drafted a posteriori, would not be significant in light of the relevant jurisprudence and the practice of the commission, which would have accepted to consider studies drafted a posteriori of the adoption of a measure in the past. (c) finally, the argument of the commission that the cost calculation methodology used by spain does not take any account of efficiency would also be contradicted by the fact that the method to calculate the net cost of the uso is based on the nera report issued by the commission. the method should therefore be necessarily considered in line with eu law. (63) correos also indicates that should the commission conclude that the measure constitutes state aid, it should be considered compatible with the internal market pursuant to article 106(2) of the treaty. (64) correos reiterates that the compensation methodology used by the spanish authorities and contained in the nera report is a valid implementation of the nac methodology and should be accepted by the commission. furthermore, correos considers that it has not been overcompensated for the provision of the uso for the period 2004-2010 because the compensation was calculated following the nac methodology without including any reasonable profit. (65) should the commission conclude that the measure may involve incompatible state aid, correos insists that the commission should take into account the dividends paid to the state during the period 2004-2010 as a reduction of the compensation granted to correos. 4.1.2. tax exemptions from real estate tax (ibi) and tax on economic activities (iae) (66) as regards the ibi tax exemption, correos explains first that these measures should not be assessed in light of the 1998 postal law or the 2010 postal law, but with direct reference to the legislation governing each tax. (67) moreover, correos considers that the measure does not constitute state aid because it is not imputable to the state. the tax exemption is not laid down in any legal provision. few local tax administrations, as well as few local courts applied the tax exemption to 94 correos premises out of 13 000. the spanish supreme court in its judgement of 7 october 2013 concluded that article 22(2) of the 2010 postal law did not include the ibi tax exemption. (68) furthermore, correos considers that the ibi tax exemption cannot be recovered since it is res judicata. following the jurisprudence of the union courts (11), if the final judicial resolution has assessed the existence of state aid, the principle of res judicata should be respected. correos considers that the judgement of the spanish supreme court applies union law and refers to the existence of state aid. therefore, the principle of res judicata should be respected and recovery should be prevented in the case at stake. (69) in addition, correos considers that the res judicata principle should be considered as a general principle of union law and that this principle should be respected when there is impossibility of recovery due to the existence of a final judgement where the existence of aid has already been determined. (70) as regards the iae tax exemption, correos argues that the partial tax exemption from iae does not constitute state aid. in particular, correos claims that the partial tax exemption is not selective since it is justified by the logic of the iae tax system. according to correos, the nature or intrinsic logic of the iae is to tax economic activities with the aim to intervene in the production or distribution of goods and services. correos is engaged in economic activities that consist in the production of goods and services, but it is also engaged in providing public services like the uso, which do not follow the economic purpose of the latter. this would therefore be the justification of the partial iae tax exemption. (71) furthermore, correos considers that the partial iae tax exemption constitutes existing aid. the iae tax exemption has been in place before the accession of spain to the eec. the so-called licence quota, which was a modality of the tax on activities and commercial and industrial benefits, was adopted by decree 3313/1966 of 29 december 1966. law 39/1988 of 28 december 1988 would replace the tax on economic and commercial and industrial benefits in its modality of the licence quota with the iae. according to correos, there have been no substantial modifications in the taxable event since 1966. 4.1.3. capital injections in 2004, 2005 and 2006 (72) correos alleges that the capital injections carried out in 2004, 2005 and 2006 are compliant with the meip and that they do not grant an advantage to correos. (73) according to correos, the analysis of the investments undertaken due to the capital injections between 2004-2006 demonstrate that the spanish state carried out the capital injections in its role as shareholder and that those investment could have been undertaken by any private investor. (74) correos argues that the capital injections respond to the need for correos to make investments above the average level of investment of the company. the aim of the capital injections is stated in the report of correos' appearance before the congress of deputies (el congreso de los diputados) on 4 october 2005. the report makes a link between the capital injections and the need of carrying out new investments in the company. the aim of the capital injections was to carry out a modernization process within correos, increasing the efficiency and quality of the services provided by the company. (75) correos argues that the profitability of the investment demonstrates that any private investor would have carried out a similar investment as the internal rate of return of the capital injections was above the cost of capital of correos. (76) moreover, correos argues that the compliance with the meip does not necessarily require a precise profitability assessment ex-ante when applied to the situation of the shareholder of a sgei provider like the uso. such shareholder would necessarily have to factor in the obligation to deliver the sgei of the company in its considerations to make or not to make an investment. (77) in such circumstances, it would be sufficient to show on the basis of objective and verifiable evidence that a private investor faced with the same public service obligation would have acted in the same way. (78) according to correos this is the conclusion reached by the court of justice in cases chronopost i (12) and chronopost ii (13), where it was accepted that the internal rate of return calculated ex post was an appropriate means to determine whether the capital injection was meip conform. 4.1.4. compensations for the distribution of electoral material (79) correos claims that the distribution of electoral material of political candidates in the context of the organization of elections should be considered to be part of the prerogatives of the state. (80) in particular, correos argues that the distribution of electoral material is an essential function of the state because it is part of the general electoral regime, it is related to the constitutional role of political parties, and because correos' personnel, when carrying out this activity, is acting in its role of civil public servant. (81) according to correos, the distribution of electoral material by political candidates due to its aim, nature and regulation, is therefore inextricably linked to the exercise of public authority by the state. therefore, it is not an economic activity and correos should not be considered an undertaking within the meaning of article 107(1) of the treaty. (82) even if it were considered by the commission that the distribution of electoral material of political candidates is an economic activity, correos considers that it does not constitute a selective advantage granted to correos. this activity is entrusted to correos by the state because is the only postal operator capable of providing a service with the required characteristics and quality of the service. when it comes to the distribution of electoral material of political candidates, correos is therefore not in a comparable legal and factual situation with any other undertaking of the postal sector. (83) even if it were concluded by the commission that the measure constitutes state aid, correos claims that the measure should be considered existing aid. the existence of a reduced tariff for political candidates to send electoral material has been in place since 1977 where the elections of 15 june 1977 took place. the elections of 15 june 1977 where organized by royal decree 20/1997 of 18 march 1977, which established for the first time a special tariff for the distribution of electoral material. (84) correos explains that the exact amount of the reduced tariff (one peseta which is equivalent to eur 0,006) was further regulated in a ministerial order of 1977. according to correos, this reduced tariff has been in place since then. the spanish supreme court in its judgement of 2 october 2006 (14) concluded that the reduced tariff in place for the distribution of electoral material relating to political candidates still in place was one peseta (eur 0,006). (85) royal decree 20/1977 was later on superseded by organic law 5/1985 of 19 june 1985 on the general electoral system (loreg), which contained the same wording relating to the reduced tariffs for the distribution of electoral material concerning political candidates. (86) in the event that the commission concludes that the measure constitutes state aid, correos also considers that it should be declared compatible with the internal market. (87) first, the measure at stake constitutes a genuine service of economic interest. both article of the 1998 postal law and article 22(5) of the 2010 postal law recognize the provider of the uso might be entrusted with obligations related to the distribution of electoral material with the aim to safeguard the correct development of electoral processes. in addition, article 22(5) of the 2010 recognises that such entrustment should be subject to compensation. (88) correos considers that the measure is compatible pursuant to the 2012 sgei decision (15). correos explains that the 2012 sgei decision would be applicable since the average annual compensation granted to correos would be below eur 15 million. 4.2. comments from the anonymous third party (89) the anonymous third party agrees with the preliminary conclusions reached by the commission in the opening decision as regards the following measures: (a) compensations for the provision of the uso granted to correos. (b) tax exemptions from real estate tax (ibi) and tax on economic activities (iae). (c) capital increases granted to correos in 2004, 2005 and 2006. (d) compensation granted to correos for the distribution of electoral material. (90) the anonymous third party also agrees explicitly that the ongoing investigation should focus on the measures listed in recital 89. (91) it however brings to the attention of the commission several measures which have not been addressed by the commission in the 2016 opening decision and which in its view would also need to be assessed. (92) according to the anonymous third party (16): correos would have received state aid between 1998 and 2003 amounting at least to eur 794 million; correos would have inherited free of charge a postal network of 9 054 customer service points that results from the provision of the uso and that grants correos a competitive advantage for the delivery of parcel up to 20 kgs (17); correos would have benefited from some intangible or exclusive rights such as the contracts signed between correos and the public administration, the right to authenticate postal communications, the right to use the term spain, the leasing of public domain as well as customs privileges; correos would have benefited from compensations granted by the state in order to finance its publicity and communication campaigns; the fact that the spanish authorities are present in the governing bodies of correos would entail certain advantages and privileges for correos. one of these advantages is that correos has not been compelled to apply by law so far the correct compensation methodology. correos would have received compensation for the period 2011-2016 amounting to approx. eur 1,3 billion, applying the compensation methodology which was contested by the commission in the opening decision (18); correos would not apply vat rates to certain postal services that are subject to individual negotiated arrangements which would involve incompatible state aid; correos would have carried capital increases in correos express, a subsidiary company of the group correos, in order to cover losses amounting to approximately eur 233 million which would constitute state aid to correos express; correos uses a predatory pricing policy that results from the state aid measures it receives. 5. comments from spain 5.1. comment from spain on the 2016 opening decision 5.1.1. the compensation for the provision of the uso granted by means of 1998 postal law (93) spain considers that the measure does not constitute state aid pursuant to article 107(1) of the treaty. in particular, the spanish authorities argue that the measure does not grant an economic advantage to correos because the uso compensations comply with the criteria laid down in the altmark judgement (19). the spanish authorities also explain that the measure at hand was not notified because they considered that it complied with the criteria set out in the altmark judgement. (94) the spanish authorities argue that the measure meets the third altmark condition, which requires that the uso compensation does not exceed the net cost (i.e. the costs minus the relevant revenues plus a reasonable profit) of the public service obligation. spain argues that it has implemented a valid compensation methodology which would correspond to the net avoided cost methodology prescribed by directive 2008/6/ec. the spanish authorities argue that the methodology that they used resulted from the nera report, which was commissioned to the consultancy company national economic research associates by the commission. according to spain, the compensation methodology contained in the nera report is a valid implementation of the nac methodology. the commission errs in assuming that the overcompensation, including in the altmark context, can only be calculated using the cost accounting methodology, leading to the conclusion that correos in the period 2004-2010 exceeded what can be considered to be necessary to cover all or part of the costs incurred in the discharge of its uso. (95) the spanish authorities also argue that the measure complies with the fourth altmark criterion. the fourth altmark criterion requires that in the absence of a public procurement procedure, the level of compensation received be adequate provided the analysis of the costs, which a typical undertaking, well-run and adequately provided within the same sector would incur, taking into account the receipts and a reasonable profit from discharging the public service obligation. according to the spanish authorities, the comparison can only be done with undertakings of the same sector, in this case, the postal sector. spain contests the doubts raised by the commission regarding the conclusions reached in the frontier economics report which argued that the measure was compliant with the fourth altmark criteria. according to spain, the commission did not demonstrate that the postal operators from greece and italy were inefficient in any commission decision. in addition, spain considers that it is not relevant for the compliance with the fourth altmark criteria that the study was carried out ex-post. the commission in previous decisions did not consider that an ex-post study would constitute an obstacle for accepting the fourth altmark criterion. in particular, spain refers to commission decision of 21 october 2008 regarding poste italiane (20). in addition, according to spain, settled case-law has accepted reports carried out ex-post. in particular, spain refers to case chronopost-la poste (21), where the general court accepted a report drafted ex-post. (96) the spanish authorities consider that should the measure be qualified as state aid, it should declared compatible with the internal market pursuant to 106(2) of the treaty. in particular, spain considers that the measure complies with the compatibility criteria of the 2012 sgei framework. (97) the spanish authorities contest the doubts raised by the commission relating to the completeness of the entrustment act specifying the public service obligations and the methods of calculating the compensation. according to the spanish authorities, the entrustment act might be constituted by one or various binding legal act. the member state is free to choose the specific form of that entrustment act. in addition, it would not be necessary that it contains a specific reference to the term entrustment act. in particular, the spanish authorities consider that the measure complies with the requirement of paragraph 16 (e) of the 2012 sgei framework, whereby the entrustment act should contain the arrangements for avoiding and recovering any overcompensation. this was demonstrated by the fact that the excessive compensation granted in 2005 was subsequently recuperated in subsequent years. (98) as regards the possibility of using the net avoided cost as methodology for calculating the compensation, the spanish authorities argue that paragraph 69 of the 2012 sgei framework lays down no obligation to apply the net avoided cost methodology; it does not prohibit member states from using this methodology. in addition, paragraph 184 of the guide to the application of the union rules on state aid, public procurement and the internal market to services of general economic interest, and in particular to social services of general interest (22) clarifies that the aim of the non-applicability of the nac methodology laid down in paragraph 69 of the 2012 sgei framework is not to impose an extra burden to member state for those measures that existed before the obligation to use the nac methodology. therefore, the spanish authorities consider that the nac methodology, as implemented by spain, is a valid one that legally can be used for calculating the compensation granted before 2012. (99) as explained in recital 94, the spanish authorities consider that the spanish methodology for calculating the compensation of the provision of the uso, and which was based on the nera report, equates to the net avoided cost methodology. the spanish authorities consider that it is irrelevant in this respect that the spanish methodology does not contain efficiency incentives and intangible benefits since these two criteria did not exist at the time that spain implemented the methodology. these criteria were introduced later on by directive 2008/6/ec and the 2012 sgei framework. (100) the spanish authorities contest the methodology and the criteria applied by the commission regarding the reasonable profit in the 2016 opening decision. the spanish authorities argue that there should not be a reasonable profit benchmark applicable to all postal operators and that it should be assessed on a case-by-case basis. the reasonable profit benchmark applied by the commission in the bpost commission decision of 25 january 2012 (23) should not be set out as a reference for other postal operators. first, bpost case differs considerably from the situation of correos, insofar as bpost case did not relate to the provision of the uso, but to other sgeis. second, the commission has not applied consistently the reasonable profit benchmark set out in the bpost decision since it has allowed higher benchmarks in other commission decisions (24). 5.1.2. tax exemption from real estate tax (ibi) and tax on economic activities (iae) (101) as regards the tax exemption from ibi, the spanish authorities explain that the 1998 postal law and 2010 postal did not exempt correos from the ibi. however, certain spanish courts, when interpreting the provisions of the 1998 postal law and 2010 postal law, considered that the ibi tax exemption was applicable to correos. the spanish authorities explain that the tax exemption was applied in very limited occasions. in fact, it was effectively applied in 94 correos premises out of 13 000. (102) the spanish authorities consider that the tax exemptions cannot be imputable to the state because they stem from the spanish courts that ruled the refunding to correos of ibi taxes previously paid by the company. (103) as regards the tax exemption from iae, the spanish authorities consider that the iae tax exemption should be considered existing aid. the iae tax exemption would have been in place before the accession of spain to the eec. according to the spanish authorities, the iae tax exemption dates back to 1966 when the tax on activities and commercial and industrial benefits was adopted by decree 3313/1966 of 29 december 1966. law 39/1988 of 28 december 1988 replaced the tax on economic and commercial and industrial benefits in its modality of the licence quota with the tax on economic activities (iae). according to spain, this tax did not undergo substantial modifications since 1966 notwithstanding the fact that correos enjoyed full exemption when it was an administrative body due to its nature. 5.1.3. capital injections in 2004, 2005 and 2006 (104) the spanish authorities consider that the capital injections carried out in 2004, 2005 and 2006 do not involve state aid because they comply with the meip. (105) they emphasise that the capital injections were preceded by ex ante economic evaluations, comparable to those which any private investor would have carried out. the capital injections were foreseen in the multiannual action plans approved by the state acting as shareholder and included in the state general budgets, which in turn reflected the company's strategic plans drawn up in order to expand its business in areas with better prospects and to improve its efficiency, in the context of a pronounced slowdown in the postal market. (106) specifically, the strategic plans for the period 2001-2006 put in place actions to complete the process of modernising the undertaking, pursuing the following objectives: (a) ensuring the future sustainability of the postal business by improving efficiency, promoting the business lines with highest added value; (b) strengthening the businesses with best prospects of medium-term growth; (c) promoting technological development in database management, mailroom, etc.; (d) modernising correos' management and organisational model and adapting it to the market context. (107) according to the spanish authorities, achieving those objectives called for the company to be equipped with additional resources in order to make the necessary investments. having analysed the undertaking's strategy, the shareholder resolved to grant three capital increases totalling eur 48,08 million, each of eur 16,027 million, to be applied in the financial years 2004, 2005 and 2006. that increase in capital was seen as a key element in achieving the profitability ratios forecast in the company's action plans and reflected in the evaluations carried out by the sole shareholder. the capital increases were in fact dictated by the need to make investments which were incremental or additional to those the company was making habitually. (108) the spanish authorities further argue that the evaluation was embodied in a framework of business prospects and results associated with the capital increase, drawn up with a horizon of five years, a reasonable period for assessing whether the business investment decisions were satisfactory. those projections were reflected in the multiannual action plans (maps), which in turn were incorporated into the state general budgets. the map approved in the 2004 financial year showed growth of 3,6 % in annual turnover and an improvement in net profits with average profits of around 5 % a year, all compared with a static scenario of no capital increase. those results were obtained on the basis of an equal number of capital disbursements in 2004, 2005 and 2006, thereby enabling implementation of the lines of action envisaged in the strategic plans as far as investment was concerned. (109) the forecasts included in the map and incorporated into the state general budget would be fully comparable with those a market economy private investor would have made. they are the basis on which the state, in its capacity as shareholder, relied when it resolved to perform three increases in the company's share capital totalling eur 48 081 000. (110) those forecasts, made ex ante, are shown in table 3. table 3 2004 map 2005 2006 2007 2008 net turnover (eur thousand) 1 897 475 1 975 031 2 047 873 2 115 371 turnover growth 3,4 % 4 % 3,6 % 3,2 % net profit or loss for the financial year (eur thousand) 78 092 97 214 106 038 113 403 forecast net profit 4,1 % 4,9 % 5,1 % 5,3 % (111) the spanish authorities explain that the maps are sound ex ante analyses of economic and financial projections. the forecasts they contain show levels of returns equivalent to those which a private investor would have required, with the effect that the decision to increase the share capital, to enable the company to make the investment necessary to achieve the forecast profits, is fully justified. those margins of return would have led any private investor, according to the spanish authorities, to make a similar decision. (112) spain indicates that it passed the resolution to increase the share capital and disburse eur 16,027 million on 13 december 2004, based on the map for the 2004 financial year with the favourable financial projections shown in table 1. similarly, the shareholder passed the decisions relating to successive increases on 5 december 2005 and 29 december 2006 respectively, likewise on the basis of the corresponding maps. spain also indicates that the actual evolution of the parameters used in the maps clearly improved on the financial projections, as can be seen in the table 4. table 4 actual results 2005 2006 2007 2008 net turnover (eur thousand) 1 940 000 2 014 400 2 106 600 2 141 000 net profit or loss for the financial year 9,1 % 7 % 4,9 % 3,6 % net profit 4,3 % 9,1 % 7 % 4,9 % (113) to supplement the foregoing, the spanish authorities have also provided a private investor test carried out ex-post by ernst & young, which concludes that the internal rate of return (hereinafter rr) of the capital increases examined was 9,29 %, and the market cost of capital of that investment was 7,87 % at the time of the investment. (114) in this respect, the spanish authorities consider that the remarks made by the commission in the 2016 opening decision, based on the commission v edf case (25), on the need to carry out the profitability analysis before the investment in question, fail to take into account that an ex ante economic evaluation was carried out, the private investor test contained in the report serving as supplementary evidence for ratifying the validity of the meip used. (115) the spanish authorities dispute more fundamentally the relevance of the commission v edf ruling in the present case because edf was operating under normal market conditions while correos was entrusted with the uso. the spanish authorities argue that when analysing the measures adopted in relation to a public undertaking operating in a sector with a uso, an ex post profitability analysis cannot be deemed to be invalid, because delivery of the general economic service is not governed by strictly commercial logic, and it is necessary in that case to take into account all the objective and verifiable data available. (116) following this logic, the spanish authorities consider that a more relevant jurisprudence would be cases chronopost i (26) and chronopost ii (27) where the court of justice of the european union endorsed the analysis made by the commission in decision 98/365/ec (28) in the two judgments it delivered as a result of the corresponding appeals against that decision. in that decision, the commission had assessed whether the behaviour of the french postal operator (la poste) as a shareholder of sfmi-chronopost, was justified in commercial terms in accordance with the criteria of a market economy private investor and had compared the irr of the capital injections made by the state in favour of la poste and its cost of equity on an ex-post basis. (117) the spanish authorities finally explain that should the commission refuse that the capital injections fulfil the meip, they should be considered in the light of article 106(2) of the treaty because they represent resources dedicated to covering the public service, and were not under any circumstance operating aid, neither by reason of the destination of the funds nor by their nature. 5.1.4. the distribution of electoral material concerning political candidates (118) the spanish authorities consider that the distribution of electoral material by correos does not constitute state aid within the meaning of article 107(1) of the treaty. all activities carried out by correos in the context of the organization of elections, and in particular the distribution of electoral propaganda concerning political candidates, are not economic activities since they constitute a prerogative of the state. (119) in particular, as regards the distribution of electoral propaganda of political candidates, the spanish authorities contest the conclusions reached in the opening decision that the measure is an economic activity. the spanish authorities claim that the state has not introduced market tools to ensure that all voters receive electoral propaganda of political candidates. an electoral procedure is composed of a number of activities, all of them necessary and intertwined, which aim at ensuring the fundamental right of voting. therefore, this activity should be considered to be a prerogative of the state. (120) the spanish authorities consider that should the measure constitute aid, it would be existing aid since it predates the accession of spain to the european economic community in 1986. the compensation granted to electoral candidates for the distribution of electoral material has been in place since 1977 without undergoing any substantial modifications. article 44(3) of royal decree-law 20/1977 of 18 march 1977 relating to electoral provisions laid down that a ministerial order would set out the special postal tariffs to be applied to electoral material sent by political candidates. ministerial order of 3 march 1977 and ministerial order of 4 may 1977 set out the fixed tariff of one peseta for letters up to 50 grams, which has remained unaltered since then. (121) article 53 organic law 5/1985 of 19 june 1985 on the general electoral system reiterated the obligation to fix by ministerial order the special tariff to be charged to political candidates for sending electoral material. article 1 of the ministerial order of 13 october 1985 declared that the special tariffs of the ministerial order of 3 may 1977 were still applicable. later on, article 1 of ministerial order of 30 april 1986 established that the special tariffs laid down in article 1 of the ministerial order of 30 october 1985 were still applicable, that is, the special tariffs of the ministerial order of 3 may 1977. article 12 of royal decree 605/1999 of 6 of april 1999 and the 1998 and 2010 postal laws did not alter the special tariff applicable to political candidates, which is currently lay down in article 59 of organic law 5/1985 of 19 june 1985 on the general electoral system and which refers to the special tariffs laid down in the ministerial order of 3 march 1977. (122) furthermore, the spanish authorities allege that should the measure be considered state aid it should be declared compatible with the internal market pursuant to article 106(2) of the treaty. (123) given the limitation period of 10 years contemplated in the opening decision (14 february 2004 - 14 february 2014), the spanish authorities allege that the period under scrutiny should be 2004-2012 since in 2013 there were no elections. (124) the entrustment of the service of general economic interest during the period 2004-2011 was laid down in ministerial orders, which included the content, scope and duration of the public service obligation. the entrustment of the service of general economic interest to correos during the years 2011 and 2012 was laid down in an agreement of the council of ministers for each election. these agreements indicate the nature, content, scope and duration of the service of general economic interest. moreover, the table 5 shows that, in any event, the total compensation which correos received for delivering election material during the elections held from 2004 until 2012 did not exceed the costs incurred. table 5 undercompensation of correos for the delivery of the electoral material (eur) year election scope total costs revenue eur 0,006 per item compensation for distribution of election material revenue + compensation total costs 2004 national [ ] (*1) [ ] 27 182 926 [ ] 2005 regional [ ] [ ] 3 670 281 [ ] 2006 regional [ ] [ ] 4 528 376 [ ] 2007 national/regional [ ] [ ] 19 536 604 [ ] 2008 national/regional [ ] [ ] 19 609 632 [ ] 2009 national/regional [ ] [ ] 14 603 021 [ ] 2010 regional [ ] [ ] 4 620 588 [ ] 2011 national/regional [ ] [ ] 40 092 858 [ ] 2012 regional [ ] [ ] 14 268 978 [ ] 2013 n/a [ ] [ ] [ ] total [ ] [ ] 148 113 264 [ ] 5.2. comment from spain on the comments from third parties (125) firstly, the spanish authorities point out that the complainant whose letter gave rise to these proceedings has not submitted observations on the 2016 opening decision. the spanish authorities take note that the only third parties which submitted observations are correos y tel grafos, s.a. and an anonymous party representing the parcel delivery sector as can be deduced from the content of the comments made. 5.2.1. observations on the comments submitted by the anonymous third party (126) the spanish authorities refer to their comments made on the 2016 opening decision on a number of issues for which the anonymous third party does not provide any specific additional argument. (127) in addition, the spanish authorities provide some additional comments on the following issues 5.2.1.1. time extension of the investigation (128) the spanish authorities consider that the request for the investigation to be extended to the time-barred period is inadmissible and inconsistent since, in accordance with settled court of justice case-law, the commission only subjects measures that raise serious doubts of compatibility to the formal investigation procedure under article 108(2) of the treaty, provided that these measures were carried out outside the ten-year limitation period. the spanish authorities also note that the anonymous interested party has recognized this legal point in its own comments which mention that it is clear that these amounts cannot be the subject of the investigation procedure, since the time limitation period for review has expired. (129) the spanish authorities also consider that the request for the investigation to be extended to the period after 2010 is unjustified since the spanish state confined itself to making advances from the state general budget which will be adjusted once the net cost has been determined, after the new plan de prestaci n has been notified and the european commission has given an opinion on it. (130) the spanish authorities consider that the third party implicitly recognises that the net cost cannot be determined until the new plan de prestaci n has been adopted since it refers in its comments to the notes to correos' annual accounts for 2014 which state: a resolution by the cnmc (29) on a calculation of the net cost of the ups in 2011, 2012 and 2013 different from the calculation in the state general budget might possibly have an impact on the amounts entered in the accounts. it would not be possible to calculate this final impact until the entry into force of the new plan de prestaci n, which will establish the methodology and components for calculating the net cost. 5.2.1.2. alleged advantages related to the vat exemption (131) as regards the vat exemption, the spanish authorities explain that it is laid down in spanish legislation in full conformity with the provisions of the eu directive regulating this matter. the spanish authorities also explain that the condition of imputability is not met if a national measure transposes a community act that is not subject to any margin of discretion, as ruled in the court of justice judgment of 23 april 2009 in case c-460/07 (puffer) (30). 5.2.1.3. alleged compensations granted by the state in order to finance its publicity and communication campaigns (132) the spanish authorities deny that correos may have benefited from aid to finance its publicity and communication campaigns. (133) in particular, the spanish authorities clarify that the related institutional publicity and communication plans mentioned by the anonymous third party as an indication of such support includes all the activities carried out by the bodies of the general state administration as well as public undertakings, in this field for statistical purposes but that the correos publicity costs mentioned in these plans have always been covered by the company resources. (134) the spanish authorities explain that, as indicated in the plan itself, the institutional publicity and communication commission, an administrative collegiate body, includes in the plan all the institutional campaigns to be conducted by the state general administration and related bodies. like any other public undertaking, correos y tel grafos, s.a. draws up its own publicity plans financed from its own resources, and includes them within that plan merely for statistical purposes. 5.2.2. observations on the comments submitted by correos (135) the spanish authorities agree with the observations made by correos y tel grafos, s.a. (136) the spanish authorities react to the request made by correos in its written observations that the dividends distributed should be assigned to a reduction in the excess compensation indicated in the 2016 opening decision by reiterating that so far no proof has been provided on the existence of such overcompensation. (137) however, spain also reiterates its comments stressing the need to take account of the payment of dividends for the purposes of reducing any potential aid that might be identified at the end of the formal investigation procedure. these extraordinary and non-recurring dividends granted by correos to the state should, according to the spanish authorities, be taken into account for the purposes of calculating the public resources made available to correos, in accordance with the statsbaner decision of the commission (31). 5.3. additional comments from spain 5.3.1. alternative approaches for the calculation of an overcompensation of the uso over 2004-2010 (138) while reiterating that the uso compensations granted over 2004-2010 to correos do not entail state aid and if they do such aid should be considered compatible, the spanish authorities consider that even accepting the commission approach in the 2016 opening decision to use the cost allocation methodology (32), a potential overcompensation could only be calculated following the premises below: (139) first, the reserved area and non-reserved area should be treated separately: the reserved area corresponds to uso postal services delivered under a monopoly; the non-reserved area comprised the uso postal services furthermore, the compensation in the reserved area followed a method whose results fully matched the cost allocation one, whereas the non-reserved area applied a nac approach, the compensation being calculated and determined separately for each area. thus, these areas should be considered as two distinct sgeis subject to separate assessments and to different compensation methodologies. under the spanish methodology, the compensation for the reserved area corresponds to its accounting net cost (overall costs minus revenues), whereas the compensation for the non-reserved is calculated under a nac approach covering the results of the losses of the loss-making segments of the non-reserved area under the assumption that any private operator would discontinue them in the absence of public service obligations. (140) according to this reasoning, out of a total of approx. eur 955,237 million of total uso compensation granted to correos over 2004-2010 approximately eur 637,850 million (the accounting loss of the reserved area) would be allocated to the reserved area and eur 317,387 million (the remainder) to the non-reserved area (see table 6). table 6 compensations for uso reserved and non reserved area (eur million) 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 total reserved area 46,171 40,435 39,558 80,823 101,783 176,559 152,521 637,850 non reserved area 44,859 47,294 55,199 39,441 40,863 45,919 43,812 317,387 total 91,030 87,729 94,757 120,264 142,646 222,478 196,333 955,237 (141) the spanish authorities consider that the two compensations should then be assessed separately leading to a different result from the one reached by the commission in the 2016 opening decision. 5.3.1.1. assessment of the compensations to the uso reserved area (142) the spanish authorities suggest to assess the compensations to the uso reserved area using the cost allocation methodology and a return on sales (33) (hereinafter ros) benchmark of 4,8 % ros (the benchmark applied in the bpost case for low risk entrustments). (143) such an approach results in clear under-compensation of correos for this sgei since aid granted for the uso reserved area corresponds exactly to its net accounting cost as illustrated by table 7, under-compensation amounting to the reasonable profit not accounted for. table 7 under-compensation of the uso reserved area (eur million) uso reserved area 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 total revenues [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] costs [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] net cost = costs-revenues [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] reasonable profit (based on 4,8 % ros) [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] net cost + reasonable profit [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] compensation allowed to correos [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] compensation granted to correos 46,171 40,435 39,558 80,823 101,783 176,559 152,521 637,850 undercompensation = compensation allowed compensation granted [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] (144) the spanish authorities explain that given that correos is undercompensated for the delivery of the uso reserved services and that the other conditions of the 2012 sgei framework are complied with, the compensation allocated to the uso reserved area should be considered compatible. 5.3.1.2. assessment of the compensations to the uso non-reserved area (145) the spanish authorities consider that as regards the uso non-reserved services, the benchmark used in the bpost case for high risk entrustments can be applied. (146) however, under such an assumption, the spanish authorities recognize that the uso non-reserved area would exhibit a negative net cost in every year, that is, a net profit which would not allow for any compensation as illustrated by table 8. table 8 overcompensation of the uso non reserved area (eur million) uso non-reserved area 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 total revenues [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] costs [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] net cost = costs-revenues [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] reasonable profit (based on 7,4 % ros) [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] net cost + reasonable profit [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] compensation allowed 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 compensation granted 44,859 47,294 55,199 39,441 40,863 45,919 43,812 317,387 overcompensation = compensation granted compensation allowed 44,859 47,294 55,199 39,441 40,863 45,919 43,812 317,387 (147) under this approach, the compensation allocated to the uso non-reserved area could be considered incompatible to the extent that it overcompensated correos. however, the spanish authorities also underline that dividends should be taken into account as having de facto reduced the amount of compensation granted to correos as explained in recitals 148 to 152. 5.3.2. dividends (148) the spanish authorities explain that correos has paid dividends over 2004-2010 (see table 9). table 9 dividends paid by correos (eur million) 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 total dividends paid 0,000 0,000 29,775 30,576 51,958 38,966 0,000 151,275 (149) the spanish authorities explain that these dividends should not be seen primarily as a shareholder remuneration as they have rather played the role of an implicit claw-back mechanism allowing the spanish authorities, in the particular circumstances of this case, to reduce potential over-funding by recovering resources from the company. the state, acting in its capacity of budgetary authority, decided to include such dividends in each state general budget adopted in the period 2005-2008 to address potential over-funding identified in the previous year to the one when such budgetary decisions were taken. no such provision was adopted in 2009 and 2010, as forecasts pointed to company losses in those years. (150) first, the spanish authorities explain that the decision to pay dividends is imputable to the spanish state, as a public authority, rather than to correos management. in this respect, the spanish authorities explain that: (a) the provision on paying dividends by correos is reflected in the state general budget both under the capital item of the company and the non-tax state income chapter. the state general budget is adopted through a draft law (anteproyecto de ley) approved by the council of ministers and submitted to the parliament for final decision. (b) the need to undertake funding adjustments through dividends is based on the company's results of the year preceding the one in which they are reflected in the state general budget, as such results are the only ones available when the draft budget law is adopted in september each year. (c) correos as a company had clearly no interest in paying dividends to the state which was anyway committed to pay the uso compensation until 2010. (151) second, the spanish authorities explain that circumstances were such that the dividends were the only practical way to modulate the potentially excessive funding in certain years for the following reasons: (a) in 2000, spain adopted a contract with correos according to which a certain compensation amount was automatically payable, its calculation being based on a pre-defined formula, until 2010. (b) while spain did not undertake as such a formal check for overcompensation, the spanish authorities were aware that the particularly positive financial situation of the company in certain years provided evidence that part of the funding may not have been fully necessary in these years. (c) in such circumstances, collecting dividends stood as the only legal mean for the state to reduce the potential funding excess granted to correos, no alternative means being foreseen in the contract. the dividends worked in this case as a kind of claw-back mechanism. (d) the spanish authorities also explain that correos did not get any particular economic advantage from receiving excess funding and repaying it through dividends. the company was very profitable in these years (and did not need the extra funds to function), did not get bank loans (so did not benefit from a better creditworthiness) and did not make particular acquisitions. (152) based on that logic, the spanish authorities explain that the dividends paid in year n, were decided in year n-1 based on the accounting results available for year n-2. therefore these dividends aimed at reducing the overcompensation arising from year n-2 as summarized in table 10. table 10 dividends and overcompensation (eur million) amount of dividends year of payment related year of overcompensation amount of overcompensation of the given year reduced overcompensation for the given year 29,775 2006 2004 44,859 15,084 30,576 2007 2005 47,294 16,718 51,958 2008 2006 55,199 3,241 38,966 2009 2007 39,441 0,475 0,000 2010 2008 40,863 40,863 0,000 2011 2009 45,919 45,919 0,000 2012 2010 43,812 43,812 total 151,275 317,387 166,112 6. additional observations submitted by unipost (153) on 20 march 2018, unipost informed the commission that it had entered liquidation on 19 february 2018 and that it considers that incompatible state aid granted to correos had played a significant role in its bankruptcy. (154) according to unipost such incompatible aid has made it possible to correos to apply lower prices in the non-reserved markets, applying a pricing policy that was not related to its costs in such non-reserved markets. 7. assessment of the measures 7.1. the uso compensations granted under the 1998 postal law 7.1.1. state aid within the meaning of article 107(1) of the treaty (155) according to article 107(1) of the treaty any aid granted by a member state or through state resources in any form whatsoever which distorts or threatens to distort competition by favouring certain undertakings or the production of certain goods shall, in so far as it affects trade between member states, be incompatible with the internal market. (156) it follows that, in order for a financial measure to be qualified as state aid within the meaning of article 107(1) of the treaty, the following cumulative conditions have to be met: (i) the measure must be imputable to the member state and granted through state resources, (ii) it must confer an economic advantage to undertakings, (iii) that advantage must be selective, and (iv) the measure must distort or threaten to distort competition and be liable to affect trade between member states. 7.1.1.1. measure imputable to the state and granted through state resources (157) for a measure to constitute state aid within the meaning of article 107(1) of the treaty, it must be granted by the state or through state resources. state resources include all resources of the public sector (34), including resources of intra-state entities (decentralised, federated, regional or other) (35). (158) the compensations for the provision of the uso under the 1998 postal law are paid directly from the state general budget and are hence clearly imputable to the state and granted through state resources. 7.1.1.2. selective economic advantage to an undertaking a. selectivity (159) to fall within the scope of article 107(1) of the treaty, a state measure must favour certain undertakings or the production of certain goods. hence, only those measures favouring undertakings which grant an advantage in a selective manner fall under the notion of aid. (160) the uso compensations are clearly selective as they benefit only one undertaking: correos. b. the notion of undertaking (161) public funding granted to an entity can only qualify as state aid if that entity is an undertaking within the meaning of article 107(1) of the treaty. the court of justice of the european union (court of justice) has consistently defined undertakings as entities engaged in economic activity (36). the qualification of an entity as an undertaking thus depends on the nature of its activity, with no regard to the entity's legal status or the way in which it is financed (37). an activity must generally be considered to be economic in nature where it consists in offering goods and services on a market (38). an entity that carries out both economic and non-economic activities is to be regarded as an undertaking only with regard to the former (39). the mere fact that an entity does not pursue a profit does not necessarily mean that its operations are not of an economic nature (40). (162) in the present case, correos offers postal services against remuneration on the spanish market and in competition with other providers. offering postal services on this market thus amounts to an economic activity. the uso compensations compensate correos for the provision of certain of these postal services and hence compensate an economic activity. accordingly, with respect to the activities financed by the measures in question, correos must be qualified as an undertaking. c. economic advantage (163) an advantage for the purposes of article 107(1) of the treaty is any economic benefit which an undertaking would not have obtained under normal market conditions, i.e. in the absence of state intervention (41). only the effect of the measure on the undertaking is relevant, neither the cause nor the objective of the state intervention (42). whenever the financial situation of the undertaking is improved as a result of state intervention, an advantage is present. (164) the uso compensations are designed to cover all or part of the net cost incurred by correos in performing the uso. without state intervention, correos would have to bear these costs itself. the measure under assessment relieves correos of some of the costs of its economic activities and thus improves correos' financial situation. in consequence, and without prejudice to the question of whether the measure complies with the conditions set by the altmark judgment, the measure under assessment prima facie grants correos an advantage. d. compliance with the altmark criteria (165) public service compensation granted to a company that complies with the four criteria laid down by the court of justice in its altmark judgment is deemed not to grant any economic advantage and thus does not constitute state aid (43). those four cumulative criteria are the following: (a) ( ) first, the recipient undertaking must actually have public service obligations to discharge and those obligations must be clearly defined ( ). (b) ( ) second, the parameters on the basis of which the compensation is calculated must be established in advance in an objective and transparent manner ( ). (c) ( ) third, the compensation cannot exceed what is necessary to cover all or part of the costs incurred in the discharge of the public services obligation, taking into account the relevant receipts and a reasonable profit ( ). (d) ( ) fourth, where the undertaking which is to discharge public service obligations, in a specific case, is not chosen pursuant a public procurement procedure, which would allow for the selection of the tenderer capable of providing those services at the least cost to the community, the level of compensation needed must be determined on the basis of an analysis of the costs, which a typical undertaking, well-run and adequately provided within the same sector would incur, taking into account the receipts and a reasonable profit from discharging the obligations. (166) concerning the compensation granted to correos during the period under review, the commission confirms the views taken in the 2016 opening decision (44) that the third and the fourth altmark criteria are not fulfilled. the third altmark criterion (167) in its decision of 25 january 2012 regarding bpost (45), the commission determined a reasonable profit range benchmark applicable to all postal operators in the union. the commission determined that benchmark profit level on the basis of three expert studies (by respectively wik consult, deloitte, and charles river associates). that benchmark profit level applicable to all eu postal operators (expressed as ros) is based on the observed profitability of sets of comparable firms in the postal and parcel sector in several countries. in particular, in cases where a postal operator is exposed to a significant degree of risk, the benchmark range [5,4-7,4 % ros] applies, whereas in cases where only a limited risk is present the benchmark range [3,6-4,8 % ros] is used (46). (168) the commission had expressed doubts in the 2016 opening decision that correos may have been overcompensated based on the following calculation (see table 11) using the highest ros benchmark determined in the bpost case. table 11 potential overcompensation of correos (eur million) 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 total uso revenues [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] uso costs [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] net cost = costs-revenues [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] reasonable profit (based on 7,4 % ros) [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] net cost + reasonable profit [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] compensation allowed to correos [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] compensation granted to correos 91,030 87,729 94,757 120,264 142,646 222,478 196,333 955,237 potential overcompensation = compensation granted compensation allowed [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] (169) the spanish authorities and/or correos (47) have made some comments regarding the doubts expressed by the commission (see sections 4.1.1 and 5.1.1): (a) the nac methodology can be used to verify whether the 3rd altmark criterion is fulfilled. (b) the spanish methodology is a valid implementation of the nac methodology. (c) the compensations granted to correos correspond to the nac of the uso, so there cannot be any overcompensation and therefore the 3rd altmark criterion should be deemed fulfilled. (d) legitimate expectations would apply in respect of the fulfilment of the 3rd altmark criterion by the use of the nac methodology and therefore by the use of the spanish methodology. (e) the spanish authorities have also proposed an alternative for the implementation of the cost allocation methodology which leads to a different result than the one of the commission. (170) these different arguments are discussed below. the nac methodology can be used to verify whether the 3rd altmark criterion is fulfilled. (171) the spanish authorities and/or correos consider that the 3rd altmark criterion can be verified by means of the nac methodology (i.e. that the absence of overcompensation requested by the 3rd altmark criterion can be verified by comparing the nac of the sgei and the compensation granted to the sgei provider). (172) the commission recalls that the altmark judgment was adopted on 29 july 2003. there is no doubt that at the moment of the adoption of that judgment, the only applicable method for the calculation of the net cost of sgeis was the cost allocation methodology. the altmark judgment itself refers to incurred costs and receipts which identifies without doubt the cost allocation methodology while the nac relies essentially on the notion of avoided costs (which are by definition not incurred). (173) the cost allocation methodology was included in the 2005 sgei framework (48) which applied from 29 november 2005 until 31 january 2012, and served as the basis for several commission decisions on compensation for usos in that period (49). it is also the methodology to be used under the 2012 sgei framework if the nac methodology cannot be applied (50). the nac methodology was only introduced formally by the commission, as a valid way to calculate the net cost of the uso, in directive 2008/6/ec (which entered into force on 1 january 2011) and the 2012 sgei framework (which entered into force on 31 january 2012). (174) the court of justice of the european union has clarified that the notion of state aid is an objective and legal concept defined directly by the treaty (51). it would then seem incorrect to modify over time the methodology used to appreciate the presence of aid under the altmark judgment to align it with the options chosen by the commission in the 2012 sgei framework which describes the conditions for the compatibility of certain sgei compensations. in any case as explained in recital 172, such interpretation is contrary to the letter of the judgment. (175) the commission therefore disagrees that the nac methodology could be used to verify the compliance with the 3rd criterion of the altmark judgment. the spanish methodology is a valid implementation of the nac methodology (176) the spanish authorities and/or correos defend that the spanish methodology is a valid implementation of the nac methodology recognized as an appropriate method to calculate the net cost of the uso in directive 2008/6/ec and the 2012 sgei framework. (177) the commission considers that, even if the nac methodology could be used to verify compliance with the 3rd criterion of the altmark judgment, quod non, the spanish methodology can clearly not be considered as a valid implementation of the nac methodology. (178) first, it can be observed that, as recognized by the spanish authorities themselves, the spanish method applies the cost allocation methodology to the uso reserved area (see recital 139). according to the spanish authorities, only the approach applied to the uso non-reserved area (where the net cost is equal to the sum of the losses of the loss making segments of the uso non-reserved area) could potentially be compared to a nac (see recital 139). such dual approach seems in itself contradictory with the nac methodology as described (52) and implemented by the commission in its decision practice (53) which implies to compare the situation of the whole company with and without the public service obligation (in this case the uso). (179) even considering only the uso non-reserved area, the spanish methodology also presents a number of differences with the nac methodology as described and implemented by the commission in its decision practice. (180) first, the spanish methodology does not seem to be built on a realistic counterfactual scenario which is a major element of the net avoided cost methodology. indeed, it simply considers ex-post the losses of the loss making cost centres. the spanish authorities argue that it is built on an implicit counterfactual scenario: any private operator would discontinue these loss-making centres in the absence of public service obligations (see recital 139). however, such an approach does not seem to describe a real business strategy which would require determining ex-ante the cost centres to discontinue as an operator could not be expected to know in advance exactly which cost centres would be loss-making. moreover, the spanish methodology seems to imply that costs centres could be discontinued and recreated at will from one year to the other over the assessment period which is not a realistic counterfactual scenario. (181) furthermore, the spanish methodology does not correct for the impact of the cessation of delivery of those unprofitable traffic flows on the profitability of other (uso or non-uso) products and services, as also required by the nac methodology. (182) finally, the spanish methodology does not take into account intangible and market benefits nor does it contain incentives for cost efficiency, as required by the nac methodology. (183) considering the above, the commission does not consider that the spanish methodology is a valid implementation of the nac methodology. the compensations granted to correos correspond to the nac of the uso, so there cannot be any overcompensation and therefore the 3rd altmark criterion should be deemed fulfilled. (184) as explained in recitals 172 to 175, the commission does not consider that the nac methodology is appropriate to verify the 3rd altmark criterion, moreover as explained in recitals 176 to 183, the commission does not consider the spanish methodology as a valid implementation of the nac methodology. (185) as a consequence, the commission considers that the compensations granted to correos according to the spanish methodology do not correspond to the nac of the uso and that even if they did this would not be sufficient to ensure compliance with the 3rd altmark criterion. legitimate expectations would apply in respect of the fulfilment of the 3rd altmark criterion by the use of the nac methodology and therefore by the use of the spanish methodology. (186) the spanish authorities and/or correos claim that spain could have legitimate expectations regarding the fulfilment of the 3rd altmark criterion by the use of the nac methodology and the spanish methodology. (187) the court of justice has held (54), in respect of state aid, that where the aid has not been notified to the commission, and is therefore unlawful aid, there can be no recourse to the principle of protection of legitimate expectations. accordingly, a legitimate expectation that aid granted is lawful cannot, barring exceptional circumstances, be entertained unless that aid was notified to the commission. (188) spain has never notified the uso compensations to the commission despite the publicity made by the commission on its state aid decisional practice in the postal sector (55). in particular, several state aid decisions of the commission in the postal sector publicly available assess the compliance with the altmark conditions and none of them has accepted the nac methodology as an appropriate mean to verify the 3rd altmark criterion. moreover, several decisions provide guidance on the approach of the commission regarding the nac methodology (56) and it is clear on that basis that the spanish methodology does not correspond to the nac methodology as implemented by the commission (as explained in recitals 177 to 183). (189) the commission considers that the nera report issued in 1998 (which had no binding effect) cannot generate legitimate expectations as regards the assessment of the presence of aid in public service compensations which has been clearly framed by the 2003 altmark judgment and by the decisional practice of the commission since this judgment. the spanish authorities have also proposed an alternative for the implementation of the cost allocation methodology which leads to a different result than the one of the commission. (190) the spanish authorities suggest different approaches to calculate the overcompensation of the uso (see section 5.3.1). (191) without taking a position at this stage on these alternative approaches, the commission notes that they also lead to the conclusion that correos has been overcompensated for the delivery of the uso non reserved services. on that basis, the 3rd altmark criterion would not be fulfilled. the fourth altmark criterion (192) concerning the fourth altmark criterion, it is undisputed that the uso was not awarded as a result of an open public procurement procedure, but was directly entrusted to correos by the spanish authorities. (193) however, the spanish authorities argued that correos is compensated according to the costs of a typical well-run undertaking. in support of that claim, the spanish authorities have provided a study by frontier economics to the commission. (194) the study aims to present a comparative analysis of correos' costs with the costs of other european postal operators responsible for providing the uso in order to prove that the uso compensations granted to correos fulfil the fourth altmark criterion. the study uses an econometric model to estimate the costs of a hypothetical typical well-run undertaking on the basis of information from several european postal uso providers. correos' actual costs are compared to the costs that this hypothetical typical well-run undertaking would have incurred should it have been in a situation (e.g. with regard to the network density) similar to that of correos. the study's results suggest that correos' costs in the period 2005-2010 were lower than those of the hypothetical typical well-run undertaking as estimated by the econometric model. (195) the commission expressed doubts in the 2016 opening decision that the hypothetical typical well-run undertaking defined in the study would actually be an efficient postal operator. indeed, it has not been demonstrated that the uso providers used to establish this benchmark are themselves efficient operators. instead, the study simply mentions that these postal operators are considered well-run and adequately provided, because there is no evidence of any kind that would show them to be inefficient, or that would indicate that they have incentives to operate inefficiently. this argument is however all the more difficult to accept that the set includes uso providers (57) which have received uso compensation, and for which the commission has already adopted decisions concluding that their costs could not be considered efficient costs (58). (196) the spanish authorities and/or correos argue that the commission has not formally stated in the decisions on the uso compensations granted to hellenic post and poste italiane that the operator were not efficient (see recitals 62 and 95). it can be noted that the commission has rejected a similar approach in the 2012 poste italiane decision (59) based on a comparison with a set of postal operators on the ground that it could not be inferred from available information that these operators were efficient. the commission maintains its views that it is not possible to simply assume that in average postal operators are cost-efficient in particular in light of the continuous restructuring which is impacting this sector. (197) furthermore, the uso compensation of correos has been defined on the basis of the spanish methodology which according to the spanish authorities is an implementation of the nac methodology. this seems to contradict the letter of the fourth altmark criterion which refers to the incurred cost of a well-run undertaking. (198) finally, as explained in recitals 167-168, the commission considers that the 3rd altmark criterion is not fulfilled because the methodology used by the spanish authorities appears to have resulted in compensation amounts that exceeded correos uso net cost (including a reasonable profit). this means that even if it were accepted that correos' costs are those of a well-run undertaking, it could still not be considered that the compensation granted to correos were set on the basis of these costs. (199) consequentely, it cannot be concluded that the level of compensation granted to correos was determined on the basis of an analysis of the costs, which a typical undertaking, well-run and adequately provided within the same sector would incur, taking into account the receipts and a reasonable profit from discharging the obligations. conclusion (200) the commission concludes that two of the four cumulative altmark conditions are not fulfilled in the present case, so that the compensations must be considered as conferring an advantage to correos. 7.1.1.3. distortion of competition and effect on trade (201) public support to undertakings only amounts to state aid within the meaning of article 107(1) of the treaty if it distorts or threatens to distort competition and only insofar as it affects trade between member states. (202) concerning the principle of distortion of competition, a measure granted by a state is considered to distort or to threaten to distort competition when it is liable to improve the competitive position of the recipient compared to other undertakings with which it competes (60). for all practical purposes, a distortion of competition is thus assumed as soon as a state grants a financial advantage to an undertaking in a liberalised sector where there is, or could be, competition. (203) concerning the principle of effect on trade, the case law of the court of justice has established that any grant of aid to an undertaking exercising its activities in the internal market can be liable to affect trade between member states (61). in the field of state aid rules, an effect on trade is not a priori precluded by the local or regional character of the service provided. while there is no strict threshold or percentage below which it may be considered that trade between member states is not affected, the limited scope of the economic activity, as may be evidenced by a very low turnover, renders the presence of an effect on trade less likely. (204) as regards the present case, the commission observes that correos has been active on the markets for postal items and parcels which are characterized by intense competition with other providers from different member states (i.e. deutsche post, tnt, la poste, ups, ctt correios portugal and royal mail). as a consequence, there are no doubts that any measure benefiting correos is liable to affect competition and trade between member states. 7.1.1.4. conclusion (205) on the basis of the foregoing considerations, the commission considers that the uso compensations granted to correos under the 1998 postal law fulfil the cumulative criteria of article 107(1) of the treaty and hence that the measure constitutes state aid within the meaning of that provision. 7.1.2. existing or new aid (206) article 1(b) of council regulation (eu) 2015/1589 (62) provides that existing aid means all aid which existed prior to the entry into force of the tfeu in the respective member states. it thus follows that any aid scheme that existed in spain prior to its accession to the union on 1 january 1986 should be considered to be existing aid. (207) according to article 1(c) of the same regulation: new aid shall mean all aid, that is to say, aid schemes and individual aid, which is not existing aid, including alterations to existing aid. according to the court of justice, to establish whether an aid has been altered, it is decisive to examine whether the provisions providing for it have been altered. (63). in subsequent judgments, the court of justice and the general court have further elaborated on what kind of alteration of the provisions providing for the aid converts existing aid into new aid. according to the general court, [i]t is only where the alteration affects the actual substance of the original scheme that the latter is transformed into a new aid scheme. there can be no question of such a substantive alteration where the new element is clearly severable from the initial scheme. (64) (208) in this respect, it is worth noting that, before the entry into force of the 1998 postal law, correos' net global losses (regardless of whether these losses were caused by the uso or non-uso activities) were directly compensated from the spanish state budget. after the adoption of the 1998 postal law, the state limited the public funding of correos to the compensation for the provision of the newly defined and circumscribed uso activity and no longer to the global net losses of the company. (209) the commission thus considers that the nature of the uso compensation was fundamentally altered in two ways. first, the 1998 postal law reduced the scope of the compensation by limiting it to the uso activities, while before all of correos' activities (i.e. including non-uso) were eligible for compensation. it is worth noting that such scope reduction is considered to constitute a fundamental alteration and not a mere decrease of the compensation (65). indeed, depending on the respective financial situations of the uso and non-uso services, the alteration could result in an increase or decrease of the compensation (66). second, the method to determine the amount of compensation was also altered by means of the plan de prestaci n of 2000 (see recital 26). indeed, while initially uso compensation was based on the net losses incurred by correos, the plan de prestaci n required the use of a specific methodology (see recitals 27 and 28) to determine the amount of that compensation. (210) the commission therefore considers the scheme to have been significantly altered since spain's accession to the european union in 1986. therefore, the commission concludes that the uso compensations granted to correos under the 1998 postal law cannot qualify as existing aid for state aid purposes and therefore must be considered as new aid, at least since the entry into force of the 1998 postal law in the year 1998. 7.1.3. lawfulness of the aid measure (211) the commission notes that the uso compensations covered by this decision, to the extent that they constitute state aid within the meaning of article 107(1) of the treaty, have not been subject to notification under article 108(3) of the treaty. therefore the uso compensations constitute unlawful aid within the meaning of article 1(f) of regulation (eu) 2015/1589. 7.1.4. compatibility with the internal market 7.1.4.1. legal basis a. compatibility under article 106(2) of the treaty (212) insofar as the uso compensations benefiting correos amount to state aid within the meaning of article 107(1) of the treaty, their compatibility with the internal market needs to be assessed. the grounds on which a state aid measure can or must be declared compatible with the internal market are listed in articles 106(2), 107(2), and 107(3) of the treaty. (213) considering that the spanish authorities have consistently asserted that the uso compensations granted to correos under the 1998 postal law constitute compensation for carrying out services of general economic interest (sgei), the compatibility of those compensations with the internal market will need to be assessed on the basis of article 106(2) of the treaty. that article provides that undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest or having the character of a revenue-producing monopoly shall be subject to the rules contained in the treaties, in particular to the rules on competition, in so far as the application of such rules does not obstruct the performance, in law or in fact, of the particular tasks assigned to them. the development of trade must not be affected to such an extent as would be contrary to the interests of the union. b. temporal application of the 2012 sgei package (214) the commission has laid down the conditions according to which it applies article 106(2) of the treaty in a series of instruments, most recently, inter alia, the 2012 sgei framework and the 2012 sgei decision (67) (hereinafter together: the 2012 sgei package). previously, the commission had issued and applied the conditions for assessing compatibility under article 106(2) of the treaty laid down in the 2005 sgei framework (68) and the 2005 sgei decision (69). (215) as regards the 2012 sgei decision, since the amount of the uso compensations granted to correos over the 2004-2010 period are above eur 15 million per year, those compensations do not fall within the scope of the 2012 sgei decision, as set out in article 2 thereof. they also do not fall within the scope of the 2005 sgei decision, as set out in article 2 thereof. (216) at the current stage of development of the internal market, state aid falling outside the scope of the 2012 sgei decision may be declared compatible with article 106(2) of the treaty if it is necessary for the operation of the service of general economic interest concerned and does not affect the development of trade to such an extent as to be contrary to the interests of the union. (70) (217) the 2012 sgei framework describes the conditions under which such balance is achieved. however, in accordance with paragraph 69 of the 2012 sgei framework, since the uso compensations over the period 2004-2010 constitute illegal state aid, the conditions laid down in the following paragraphs of that framework are inapplicable for the commission's compatibility assessment under article 106(2) of the treaty: paragraph 14: give proper consideration to public service needs when entrusting the provider with a particular sgei; paragraph 19: compliance with eu public procurement rules when entrusting an sgei; paragraph 20: absence of discrimination; paragraph 24 (and onwards): application of the nac methodology to calculate the net cost; paragraph 39 (and onwards): efficiency incentives; paragraph 60: transparency. (218) therefore, in the following section the commission will assess the uso compensations under the 2012 sgei framework, excluding the aforementioned paragraphs, and determine whether those compensations comply with the remaining conditions laid down by that framework. 7.1.4.2. compatibility under the 2012 sgei framework a. genuine service of general economic interest as referred to in article 106 of the treaty (219) the service entrusted to correos by the spanish state is the universal postal service as required by article 3(1) of directive 2008/6/ec which reads: member states shall ensure that users enjoy the right to a universal service involving the permanent provision of a postal service of specified quality at all points in their territory at affordable prices for all users. as outlined in recitals 4 to 8 of directive 2008/6/ec amending directive 97/67/ec, universal postal service obligations as defined in the postal services directive are recognised by the union as constituting genuine services of general economic interest within the meaning of article 106(2) of the treaty. b. need for an entrustment act specifying the public service obligations and the methods of calculating compensation (220) as indicated in section 2.3 of the 2012 sgei framework, the concept of sgei within the meaning of article 106 of the treaty means that the undertaking in question has been entrusted with the operation of the service of general economic interest by way of one or more official acts. (221) those acts must specify, in particular: (1) the precise nature of the public service obligation and its duration; (2) the undertaking and territory concerned; (3) the nature of the exclusive rights assigned to the operator; (4) the description of the compensation mechanism and the parameters for calculating, monitoring and reviewing the compensation; (5) the arrangements for avoiding and repaying any overcompensation. (222) the 1998 postal law and the 2000 plan de prestaci n which were the relevant entrustment acts for the period 2004-2010 clearly define and entrust correos with the uso. the territory concerned is the whole national territory of spain. (223) the 1998 spanish postal law further indicates, in its article 19, the exclusive rights assigned to correos. those rights include, for instance, the use of the brand espa a, the word correos and the related symbols. (224) the 2000 plan de prestaci n provides for a mechanism to calculate the net cost of the uso (the spanish methodology) which is used as the basis for the amount of compensation (71). the compensation mechanism and the parameters for calculating the compensation can therefore be considered defined. (225) given that the spanish methodology foresaw that the uso compensations amount should correspond to an ex-post calculation of the net cost, it can be accepted that the system were designed to avoid overcompensation to the extent that the calculation methodology would have been considered reliable. while the commission disputes the applicability of the spanish methodology, this is not considered to affect the compliance with the condition to foresee mechanisms to avoid overcompensation. (226) the commission therefore considers that the entrustment of correos can be considered to be in compliance with the 2012 sgei framework. c. duration of the period of entrustment (227) as indicated in section 2.4 of the 2012 sgei framework, the duration of the period of entrustment should be justified by reference to objective criteria such as the need to amortise non-transferable fixed assets. in principle, the duration of the period of entrustment should not exceed the period required for the depreciation of the most significant assets required to provide the sgei. (228) the 1998 spanish postal law did not specify the duration of the entrustment of the uso to correos. however, the entrustment ended in 2011, when the new 2010 spanish postal law entered into force, and hence the actual duration of the entrustment was 12 years. (229) first, the commission does not consider that this requirement of the 2012 sgei framework can lead to the incompatibility of aid that predates the entry into force of this framework. indeed, the objectives of the limited duration provision included in the 2012 sgei framework are to ensure that the state reviews the market situation regularly to verify that maintaining a public service is still justified and to allow competition for the granting of this public service through the application of public procurement rules. such objectives cannot be pursued for a measure which is completed in the past and can therefore not lead to incompatibility of the uso compensations granted up to 2010 (72). (230) in addition, the commission notes that the 12 year duration of the entrustment does not appear excessive and is similar to the entrustment periods that apply to other uso providers in the eu (73) (231) it can therefore be accepted that the duration of 12 years would not exceed the depreciation period of the most significant assets used by correos for the provision of the uso as required by the 2012 sgei framework. d. compliance with commission directive 2006/111/ec (74). (232) according to paragraph 18 of the 2012 sgei framework, aid will be considered compatible with the internal market on the basis of article 106(2) of the treaty only where the undertaking complies, where applicable, with directive 2006/111/ec on the transparency of financial relations between member states and public undertakings as well as on financial transparency within certain undertakings. (233) article 29 of the 1998 spanish postal law imposes separate accounts within the internal accounting system of the universal service provider. (234) this obligation is notably implemented through order fom/2447/2004 of 12 july on analytical accounting and separation of accounts. the commission has verified that the principles established in that regulation are in line, in terms of allocation of direct and incorrect costs, with the principles established in the 2012 sgei framework (75). (235) moreover, following the request of the commission in the 2016 opening decision, the spanish authorities have provided the commission with a detailed description of the analytical accounting system of correos which is summarised in the figure. cost allocation system of correos subreparto de costes de estructura imputaci n directa coste por producto/servicio imputaci n actividades a productos ceco's operativos imputaci n de costes a ceco's costes indirectos costes directos imputaci n de ceco's a actividades imputaci n de costes a ceco's contabilidad financiera volumen tiempo costes por actividad ceco's estructura (236) as illustrated in recital 235, the correos cost accounting system is based on the cost accounting methodology called activity-based costing. the activity-based costing system is a particular method of the fully distributed cost allocation method, which complies with the applicable provisions of the 2012 sgei framework (76) and is also in line with the sector specific requirements on separate accounting laid down in article 14 of the postal services directive. (237) the analytical model of correos contains essentially the following phases: (1) determination of the costs to be imputed from the profit & loss account: in 2005, the imputable costs amounted to approximately eur [ ] billion. (2) imputation of costs to cost centers: (a) a small percentage of the costs ([ ] % approx. eur [ ] million in 2005) is imputed directly to final products. (b) the bulk of the imputable costs ([ ] % eur [ ] billion) is imputed to cost centers (cecos). the cecos (there were [ ] cecos in 2005) are the basic unit of the analytical accounting system. they are defined as unit of consumption of resources which are relevant from a cost accounting viewpoint. the analytical accounting system of correos distinguishes between: operational cecos: which consume resources that are directly related to the final products and services (e.g. post office). there were [ ] operational cecos in the analytical accounting system of correos in 2005. an amount of eur [ ] billion was imputed to operational cecos in 2005. structural cecos: which concentrate the structural costs which are not directly related to final products and services. these correspond notably to the support, administration, human resources management, it functions. there were 180 structural cecos in the analytical accounting system of correos in 2005. an amount of eur [ ] million was imputed to structural cecos in 2005. (c) the costs imputed to structural cecos are then distributed to operational cecos based on a causality relationship between operational cecos and structural cecos. (3) imputation to activities of the costs imputed to cecos: activities are group of homogeneous tasks aiming at providing final services or at supporting their provision (e.g. manual sorting, automatic sorting, transport ). 16 activities are distinguished in the analytical accounting system of correos in 2005. the costs imputed to operational cecos are distributed to activities based on the consumption by the activities of the resources of the cecos. (4) imputation to each final products and services of the costs of activities: costs are imputed to final products and services based on their causal link with the activities. (5) determination of the revenues for each final products and services to determine the revenue, the following steps are followed: (a) first, the amount revenues to be distributed are determined from the profit & loss account: in 2005, the imputable revenues amounted to approximately eur [ ] billion. (b) part of these revenues ([ ] % eur [ ] billion in 2005) corresponds to direct sales registered in the billing system of correos and can be imputed directly to final products and services. (c) the rest of the revenues ([ ] % eur [ ] million in 2005) which are not registered in the billing system but have different origins are allocated to final products and services on the basis of a table of percentages derived from studies made by correos on the causality link between the registered revenues and the products and services that have generated these revenues. (6) the margin per final product and services can therefore be calculated. (238) the commission concludes that the analytical accounting system put in place by correos is appropriate to separate the uso activities from the non uso activities and also within the uso the reserved from non-reserved activities. (239) the commission concludes that correos has complied with directive 2006/111/ec. a. amount of compensation appropriate calculation method (240) paragraph 21 of the 2012 sgei framework states that ( ) the amount of the compensation must not exceed what is necessary to cover the cost of discharging the public service obligations, including a reasonable profit. it also indicates that ( ) where the undertaking also carries out activities falling outside the scope of the sgei, the costs to be taken into consideration may cover all the direct costs necessary to discharge the public service obligations and an appropriate contribution to the indirect costs common to both the sgei and other activities. the costs linked to any activities outside the scope of the sgei must include all the direct costs and an appropriate contribution to the common costs. (241) paragraph 24 of the 2012 sgei framework states that the net cost necessary, or expected to be necessary, to discharge the public service obligations should be calculated using the net avoided cost methodology where this is required by union or national legislation and in other cases where this is possible. (242) the commission has estimated in the 2016 opening decision that, since the uso compensations granted under the 1998 postal law were granted as unlawful aid before the entry into force of the 2012 sgei framework on 31 january 2012, paragraph 69 of that framework specifically excluded the application of paragraph 24 of the framework and thus the application of the nac methodology to unlawful aid. (243) indeed, footnote 2 of recital 21 of the 2012 sgei framework clarifies that if the nac methodology cannot be applied (or, as in this case, does not apply) the net cost must be determined as the costs minus the revenues of discharging the public service obligations. this cost allocation methodology is described in paragraphs 28 et seq. of the 2012 sgei framework. it was considered the appropriate methodology to calculate sgei compensation under the 2005 sgei framework, which applied from 29 november 2005 until 31 january 2012, and served as the basis for several commission decisions on compensation for usos in that period. (77) (244) the spanish authorities and/or correos specifically disputed that argument in their comments arguing that the 2012 sgei framework did not prevent the use of the nac but simply allowed not to use it before its entry into force (see notably recital 98). (245) the commission considers that accepting the use of the nac methodology for illegal aid granted before the entry into force of the 2012 sgei framework would allow the member states to draw an advantage from the non-notification of such illegal aid measure as it could choose between the cost allocation and nac methodology while member states which have notified their sgei compensations, as foreseen by the state aid rules, were obliged to use only one method i.e. the cost allocation method. such an approach would therefore both allow spain to draw an advantage from infringing notification obligations and entail a possible breach of the principle of equal treatment. the commission therefore maintains that only the accounting method can be used in this case. (246) in any case, even if it were accepted that the nac methodology as prescribed by the 2012 sgei framework and directive 2008/6/ec could be used in this case, as explained in recitals 176 to 183, the commission considers that the spanish methodology cannot be considered as a valid implementation of the nac methodology contrary to what is argued by the spanish authorities and/or correos. (247) the spanish methodology is therefore, regardless of its potential intrinsic merits, not a method that the commission has ever recognized, neither before the entry into force of the 2012 sgei framework nor after its entry into force. (248) in such circumstances, the commission considers that the only method that can be used is the accounting method which was the only reference method at the time when the uso compensations were granted and which was the basis for several commission decisions on compensation for usos in that period. appropriate benchmarks for the reasonable profit (249) as explained in recital 167, the commission, in its bpost decision of 25 january 2012, the commission determined a reasonable profit range benchmark applicable to all postal operators in the union. (250) the spanish authorities have disputed the applicability of these benchmarks to correos, arguing that each case should be assessed on its own merits. the commission has invited the spanish authorities to provide detailed information on the spanish postal market that would allow an assessment of the opportunity to have different benchmarks for correos. however such information has not been provided. as a consequence, the commission will apply the reasonable profit range benchmark established in the bpost case to the case at hand. assessment of the alternative approach suggested by the spanish authorities (251) in the event, that the commission would apply the accounting method to the uso compensations granted to correos under the 1998 postal law, the spanish authorities have argued that the following elements should be considered (see section 5.3.1): a separated assessment of the compensations granted to the uso reserved area and the uso non reserved area a reduction by the overcompensation by dividends paid by correos. (252) these suggestions are analysed in recitals 253 to 263. a separated assessment of the compensations granted to the uso reserved area and the uso non reserved area (253) the spanish authorities have argued that the uso compensations received by correos for the delivery of reserved and non-reserved services should be assessed separately. (254) after analysing the arguments provided by the spanish authorities in the course of the formal investigation procedure, the commission considers that the split between the reserved/non-reserved area can be accepted since: the arguments supporting the differentiation of the two different sgeis seem reasonable (in particular the context of the delivery of the obligations is different between the uso reserved area and the uso non-reserved area); the split is fully coherent with the way the uso compensation was calculated which distinguishes clearly the reserved and non-reserved services and which are significantly different between the two areas. as explained by the spanish authorities, while the cost allocation methodology was applied to the uso reserved services, another approach was applied to the uso non-reserved services that the spanish authorities identify to the nac methodology. while the commission disagrees with such qualification, it agrees that the calculation methodology is fundamentally different between the uso reserved area and the uso non-reserved area. (255) the commission wishes to stress that accepting this split entails that the uso compensations to the reserved area and the uso compensations for the non-reserved area have to be assessed separately without any ulterior reconciliation of the two assessments. with the split, the commission confirms that the results presented in section 5.3.1 are correct: no overcompensation of correos for the delivery of the uso reserved services as the compensation for the uso reserved services is exactly equal to the net accounting cost of correos an overcompensation of correos for the delivery of the uso non reserved services equal to the amount of uso compensations allocated to the uso non reserved area as the profit level of the uso non reserved services was always above the maximum profit benchmark level considered in the bpost case. (256) the overcompensation of correos for the delivery of the non-reserved services is therefore equal to eur 317,387 million (in nominal terms). a reduction by the overcompensation by dividends paid by correos. (257) the spanish authorities have argued that the overcompensation of correos should be reduced by the dividends paid by correos over 2004-2010 (approximately eur 151 million). (258) as a matter of principle, the commission does not consider that dividends are an appropriate mean to reduce overcompensation as mentioned in the dansk statsbaner case (78). however, in the case at hand, the commission understands that the specific circumstances of the case had made the payment of dividends probably the only practical way to limit the impact of an overcompensation of correos deriving from the high profits of correos in the non-reserved area. (259) first, the commission agrees that spain has provided sufficient evidence proving that the decision to pay dividends originated rather from the spanish state (using its position as sole shareholder of correos) than from the management of correos itself. (260) besides the inclusion of these dividends by the state in its budget well before their actual payment which tend to show that the state was in control of the decision, it is also difficult to identify the economic interest for correos, as a company, to pay dividends to the state in that period. the typical incentives for a company to remunerate its shareholder (attract investors, secure future funding, demonstrate the good financial health of the company) do not seem relevant in the situation at hand where the state is the sole shareholder and where the company was ensured to receive continuous funding until 2010 from the state. for these reasons, considering the specific legal framework which was in place, it can be accepted that the decision to pay dividends originates essentially from the state which has used this tool to extract funds from the company. (261) as regards the spanish state, paying significant uso compensations and at the same time collecting dividends could seem inconsistent but can be understood in the context where the dividends were in fact a way to reduce potential over-funding that had to be paid anyway to correos according to the 2000 plan de prestaci n. indeed, since spain had signed a public service contract defining automatically the amount of compensation to be paid to correos irrespective of the actual profit level of the company, it can be understood that the dividends could play in such circumstances de facto the role of a claw-back mechanism. (262) the commission also takes into account that these dividends essentially originated from the overcompensated uso non reserved services which were the source of profit of correos. moreover, correos which was very profitable in the corresponding years does not seem to have drawn any particular benefit from the funds temporarily held: in particular it did not get bank loans which could have benefited from a better creditworthiness and it did not make particular acquisitions. (263) in such circumstances, the commission accept to reduce the overcompensation paid by correos with the dividends paid by correos over 2004-2010. (264) table 12 summarizes the calculation of the nominal recovery amount: table 12 calculation of the overcompensation (in eur million) uso non-reserved area 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 total revenues [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] costs [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] net cost = costs-revenues [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] reasonable profit (based on 7,4 % ros) [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] net cost + reasonable profit [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] compensation allowed to correos 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 compensation granted to correos 44,859 47,294 55,199 39,441 40,863 45,919 43,812 317,387 overcompensation = compensation granted compensation allowed 44,859 47,294 55,199 39,441 40,863 45,919 43,812 317,387 imputed dividend 29,775 30,576 51,958 38,966 0,000 0,000 0,000 151,275 adjusted overcompensation = overcompensation dividends 15,084 16,718 3,241 0,475 40,863 45,919 43,812 166,112 7.1.5. conclusion (265) the commission concludes first that the uso compensations granted to correos under the 1998 postal law constitutes unlawful state aid. (266) moreover these uso compensations constitute incompatible aid pursuant to article 106(2) of the treaty to the extent that they overcompensated correos. (267) after deduction of the dividend, the overcompensation is equal to eur 166,112 million. (268) the actual amount to be recovered may take into account a tax adjustment (79) as provided for by the recovery notice (80) which states in its paragraph 50 that national authorities are allowed to take into account the incidence of the tax system in order to determine the amount to be reimbursed. where a beneficiary of unlawful and incompatible aid has paid tax on the aid received, the national authorities may, in accordance with their national tax rules, take account of the earlier payment of tax by recovering only the net amount received by the beneficiary. the commission considers that in such cases, the national authorities will need to ensure that the beneficiary will not be able to enjoy a further tax deduction by claiming that the reimbursement has reduced his taxable income, since this would mean that the net amount of the recovery was lower than the net amount initially received. (269) the actual amount to be recovered may therefore take into account a tax adjustment under the assumption that spain will respect the conditions established in paragraph 50 of the recovery notice. it will also include interests from the date on which each uso compensation was put at the disposal of correos until recovery. 7.2. the tax exemptions obtained by correos: real estate tax (ibi) and tax on economic activities (iae) 7.2.1. state aid within the meaning of article 107(1) of the treaty 7.2.1.1. measure imputable to the state and granted through state resources (270) article 107(1) of the treaty requires that the measure be granted by a member state or through state resources in any form whatsoever. a loss of tax revenue is equivalent to consumption of state resources in the form of fiscal expenditure. (271) as the court of justice held in case banco exterior de espa a, a measure by which the public authorities grant to certain undertakings a tax exemption which, although not involving a cash transfer of state resources, places the persons to whom the tax exemption applies in a more favourable financial situation than other taxpayers, fulfils the notion of state resources within the meaning of article 107(1) of the treaty. (81) (272) by exempting correos from the real estate tax and the tax on economic activities, the spanish authorities forego revenues which constitute state resources. (273) therefore, the commission takes the view that these tax exemptions involve a loss of state resources and are consequently granted by the state through state resources. (274) the spanish authorities and/or correos have argued in their comments that the ibi tax exemption is not imputable to the state because it results from the decisions of national court and not of the state itself (see recitals 67 and 102). (275) the commission disagrees with that argument, indeed in cases where a public authority grants an advantage to a beneficiary, the measure is by definition imputable to the state, even if the authority in question enjoys legal autonomy from other public authorities (82). therefore, aid granted through judgements stemming from national courts is imputable to the state and can, thus, qualify as state aid. 7.2.1.2. selective economic advantage to an undertaking a. the notion of undertaking (276) as indicated in recital 162, correos must be qualified as an undertaking for the provision of the uso services which are the object of the tax exemption. b. economic advantage (277) the precise form of a measure is irrelevant in establishing whether it confers an economic advantage on the undertaking (83). the notion of advantage covers not only positive benefits but also interventions which, in various forms, mitigate the charges normally borne by an undertaking's budget. (84) therefore, a relief from economic burdens (such as tax obligations) can also constitute an advantage. (278) correos has been fully or partly exempted from certain taxes, such as the ibi and iae, whereas other undertakings, also engaged in economic activities including the provision of postal services, are in principle fully subject to those taxes. therefore, correos benefits from an economic advantage for the purposes of article 107(1) of the treaty. (279) the tax exemptions granted to correos reduces the charges that are normally included in its operating costs. consequently, it benefits correos in comparison to other undertakings subject to the ibi or the iae, which cannot benefit of these tax exemptions. c. selectivity (280) a measure is selective inasmuch as it favours certain undertakings or the production of certain goods within the meaning of article 107(1) of the treaty. (281) differential taxation has to be examined in light of the case-law on the notion of selectivity (85). a tax measure is prima facie selective if it constitutes a departure from the general (or reference) tax framework. in this regard, it is necessary to assess whether the measure favours certain undertakings in comparison with other undertakings, which are in a comparable legal and factual situation in light of the objective pursued by the reference tax system. according to the court's case-law, a prima facie selective measure can be justified by the logic of the tax system. however, in this regard, only intrinsic reasons inherent to the tax system and no external policy reasons can be taken into account. if the prima facie selective measure cannot be justified by the logic of the tax system, it would amount to a selective advantage and, if all other conditions laid down by article 107(1) of the treaty are fulfilled, that measure constitutes state aid within the meaning of that provision (86). real estate tax (ibi) reference framework (282) the determination of the reference taxation system (or reference framework) has a particular importance in the case of tax measures, since the very existence of an advantage may be established only when compared with the normal taxation system (87). (283) in the present case, the reference framework should be defined as the ibi, as laid down in the royal legislative decree 2/2004, of 5 march 2004. it follows from this law that, according to the normal rules, undertakings -among other legal and natural persons- are subject to ibi for the property rights laid down in article 61 the royal legislative decree 2/2004 over rural and urban properties and over property with special characteristics. derogation from the reference framework (284) according to article 60 of the royal legislative decree, ibi is an objective direct tax imposed on the value of property under the terms laid down in this royal legislative decree. the taxable event of the ibi is the entitlement to any of the rights laid down in article 61 the royal legislative decree 2/2004 (88) over rural and urban properties and over property with special characteristics. the ibi is not imposed on any activity, but on the value of property. (285) under article 19(1)(b) of the 1998 postal law and article 22(2) of the 2010 postal law, correos is in principle entitled to an exemption from taxes on the economic activities related to its services in the reserved area (under the 1998 postal law) or uso (under the 2010 postal law). although the spanish authorities argue that the ibi is not directly linked to a particular economic activity and therefore correos could not benefit from the exemption, in practice correos lodged complaints before local courts because it believed it was entitled to the ibi exemption for postal offices in certain municipalities. (286) the tax exemption from ibi applicable to correos constitutes a derogation from the general ibi tax system applicable in spain and grants a selective advantage to correos. indeed, by applying the tax exemption, correos, which is involved in real estate transactions just like other undertakings, enjoys a tax benefit to which other companies are not entitled. hence, the measure derogates from the common ibi tax regime inasmuch as it differentiates between economic operators who, in the light of the objective of the ibi tax system (which is to tax real estate property rights laid down in article 61 the royal legislative decree 2/2004 over rural and urban), are in a comparable factual and legal situation (89). intrinsic logic of the tax system (287) the commission preliminarily concludes that the ibi tax exemption applicable to correos is prima facie selective. however, it is still necessary to determine (as mentioned in recital 281), whether the tax exemption from ibi can be justified by the nature or general scheme of the ibi tax system by demonstrating that the measure directly results from the basic or guiding principles of its tax system. (288) the spanish authorities and/or correos have not provided before the adoption of the 2016 opening decision or in the course of the formal investigation procedure any argument that would demonstrate that the tax exemption from ibi would result from the application of a guiding principle of the ibi tax system. the commission has also not been able to identify such a justification. the inherent logic of the ibi tax system is to tax the property rights laid down in article 61 the royal legislative decree 2/2004 over rural and urban properties and over property with special characteristics. applying a total exemption from ibi exclusively to correos does not fit within the logic of the ibi tax system. conclusion (289) since the spanish authorities have not provided in the course of the formal investigation procedure any argument that contradicts the assessment of the commission, the commission confirms the preliminary conclusion reached in the 2016 opening decision that the tax exemption from ibi granted to correos constitutes a selective advantage that cannot be justified by the nature and logic of the ibi tax system. tax on economic activities (iae) reference framework (290) it follows from article 78 of the royal legislative decree 2/2004 that undertakings that carry out economic, business, professional or artistic activities are subject to iae. the iae tax on postal services and telecommunications is laid down in the tariff group 847 postal services and telecommunications of royal legislative decree 1175/1990 of 28 of september. accordingly, the reference framework is the iae, as laid down in the royal legislative decree 2/2004, of 5 march 2004. derogation from the reference framework (291) note 3 to tariff group 847 of royal legislative decree 1175/1990 provides that the public business entity of correos is entitled to pay only 50 % of the tax amount laid down for the undertakings subject to the tariff group 847 postal services and telecommunications. (292) the partial tax exemption from iae applicable to correos constitutes a derogation from the iae tax system applicable to economic, business, professional and artistic activities generally and postal services and telecommunications in particular. that exemption can therefore be considered to grant a selective advantage to correos. indeed, by applying the 50 % tax exemption, correos, which is involved in economic activities generally and postal services in particular, enjoys a tax benefit to which other undertakings in general and other postal operators in particular are not entitled. hence, the measure derogates from the common iae regime applicable to all undertakings in general and postal services and telecommunications operators in particular, inasmuch as it differentiates between economic operators who, in the light of the objective of the iae (which is to tax the performance of an economic activity), are in a comparable factual and legal situation (90). the commission therefore concludes that the partial exemption from the iae applicable to correos is prima facie selective. intrinsic logic of the tax system (293) it is therefore necessary to determine, in accordance with the court's case law, whether the tax exemption from iae granted to correos can be justified by the nature or general scheme of the iae tax system by demonstrating that the measure directly results from the basic or guiding principles of its tax system. (294) correos argues that the exemption from the iae would be justified by the logic of the iae tax system because the intrinsic logic of the iae would be to tax economic activities with the aim to intervene in the production or distribution of goods and services and correos is engaged not only in economic activities that consist in the production of goods and services, but also in providing public services like the uso, which do not follow an economic purpose(see recital 70). (295) the commission cannot agree with that argument. delivering the uso is an economic activity and a tax exemption that would target the uso should be considered state aid which could possibly be compatible if it complied with the sgei rules on compatibility. this argument seems to contradict the request of correos that the iae and ibi tax exemptions are not assessed in light of the 1998 or 2010 postal law which entrust correos with the uso but with direct reference to the legislation governing each tax (see recital 66). the commission notes in this respect that correos has not argued that the iae tax exemptions could constitute uso compensations. (296) as a consequence, the commission considers that it is not demonstrated that the exemption from the iae could be justified by the logic of the iae tax system. conclusion (297) the commission confirms the preliminary conclusion reached in the 2016 opening decision that the partial tax exemption from iae granted to correos constitutes a selective advantage that cannot be justified by the nature and logic of the iae tax system. 7.2.1.3. distortion of competition and effect on trade (298) as explained in recital (204), any measure benefiting correos is liable to affect competition and trade between member states. 7.2.1.4. conclusion (299) on the basis of the foregoing considerations, the commission confirms its preliminary assessment that the exemptions from ibi and iae granted to correos fulfil the cumulative state aid criteria and hence constitute state aid within the meaning of article 107(1) of the treaty. 7.2.2. existing or new aid (300) as regards the tax exemption to ibi, the tax exemptions were obtained by correos between 2008 and 2013, hence after the accession of spain to the union in 1986. therefore, the real estate tax exemption cannot be regarded as existing aid. (301) as regards the iae tax exemption, the tax was introduced by articles 79 to 92 of law 39/1988, regulating the local finance, of 28 december 1988. the tax was introduced after the accession of spain to the union. therefore, the iae tax exemption cannot normally be qualified as existing aid. (302) it can be noted that the spanish authorities and/or correos argue that the iae tax exemption are existing aid because the exemption would derive from the so-called licence quota, which was a modality of the tax on activities and commercial and industrial benefits, adopted by decree 3313/1966 of 29 december 1966 (see recitals 71 and 103). (303) the spanish authorities have not provided information to the commission that would demonstrate continuity between the 1966 tax on activities and commercial and industrial benefits and the 1988 iae tax which introduced a very specific system (see recitals 42 to 44). moreover, even assuming that the iae tax introduced in 1988 could derive from the 1966 tax on activities and commercial and industrial benefits, the commission notes that the spanish authorities also recognize that correos enjoyed full exemption from the 1966 tax on activities and commercial and industrial benefits when it was an administrative body due to its nature (see recital 103). correos has been an administrative body until 1990 (see recital 22) so it has a priori never been subject to the 1966 tax on activities and commercial and industrial benefits while the iae tax system has clearly classified correos in a specific taxable category and correos has benefited from a 50 % reduction of the payable amount under that category. (304) the commission therefore maintains its views that the iae tax exemption does not constitute existing aid. 7.2.3. lawfulness of the aid measure (305) the commission notes that the ibi and iae tax exemptions have not been subject to notification under article 108(3) of the treaty. (306) therefore, the tax exemptions granted to correos constitute unlawful aid within the meaning of article 1(f) of regulation (eu) 2015/1589. 7.2.4. compatibility with the internal market (307) state aid shall be deemed compatible with the internal market if it falls within any of the categories listed in article 107(2) of the treaty (91) and it may be deemed compatible with the internal market if it is found by the commission to fall within any of the categories listed in article 107(3) of the treaty (92). however, it is the member state granting the aid which bears the burden of proving that state aid granted by it is compatible with the internal market pursuant to paragraphs (2) or (3) of articles 107 of the treaty. (308) the commission observes that the ibi and iae tax exemptions relieve correos from costs which it would normally have had to bear in its day-to-day management or normal activities. in other words, those exemptions constitute operating aid, without any limitation in time. as a general rule, operating aid cannot be deemed compatible with the internal market under paragraphs (2) or (3) of article 107 of the treaty. (309) moreover, the spanish authorities have not advanced any arguments, before the adoption of the 2016 opening decision or in the course of the formal investigation procedure, showing that the ibi and iae tax exemptions granted to correos could fall under any of the exemptions listed in paragraphs (2) or (3) of article 107of the treaty. (310) the spanish authorities have also provided no justification, before the adoption of the 2016 opening decision or in the course of the formal investigation procedure, according to which the ibi and iae exemptions (which apply in any case not only to sgei but also purely commercial activities) could be compatible under article 106(2). 7.2.5. conclusion (311) considering the above, the commission considers that the ibi and iae tax exemptions constitute incompatible state aid and the corresponding amounts should be recovered. (312) correos argues in this respect that even if the commission were to find the ibi tax exemptions incompatible, these could not be recovered because of the res judicata principle which would entail, according to correos that the judgment of the spanish supreme court could no longer be put in question (see recital 69). (313) the commission does not share the views of correos on this point. (314) first the spanish supreme court has not ruled on the existence or non-existence of aid in the ibi exemptions granted by the local courts (see recitals 40 and 41). the only conclusion of the supreme court was that the ibi exemptions were not justified. as explained by the spanish authorities, the court also did not have the powers to order recovery. the res judicata can therefore not be evoked in this context given that there is actually no judgment concluding that correos should not repay the corresponding amounts. (315) second, the assessment of the compatibility of aid is an exclusive competence of the commission and to the extent that there is state aid, the national courts could not pronounce themselves on compatibility and recovery. (316) the recovery amount for the ibi exemption in nominal terms corresponds to the sum of the exemptions granted to correos by local courts between 2008 and 2013 and is equal to eur 752 840,50. the actual amount to be recovered will include interests from the date on which each tax refund was paid to correos until their actual recovery. (317) the recovery amount for the iae partial exemption in nominal terms corresponds to the total amount of iae reduction granted to correos from 2004 to 2017: eur 113 591,24. the actual amount to be recovered will include interests from the date on which the reduced iae taxes were paid by correos until their actual recovery. 7.3. the three capital increases granted respectively in 2004, 2005 and 2006 7.3.1. state aid within the meaning of article 107(1) of the treaty (318) the spanish authorities have argued that the three capital increases granted to correos in 2004 (eur 16 million), 2005 (eur 16 million) and 2006 (eur 16 million) complied with the meip and therefore did not constitute state aid. (319) according to the spanish authorities, those capital increases were part of correos' strategic business plan for the period 2001-2006 in order to compensate for the slowing down of the postal market. this included investments in correos' infrastructure, organization structure and automation process. (320) following the doubts expressed by the commission in the 2016 opening decision, the spanish authorities have provided the commission with additional arguments in favour of meip compliance (see section 4.1.3), namely: the prospects of correos were good at the moment of the investment based on ex-ante multiannual plans. in particular, the 2004-2006 multiannual plans foresaw an improvement in the profitability of correos against profit stability in the event of no investment activity. in that sense the capital increases were a key element in achieving the ex-ante forecasted profitability of the company. the modernisation of the company was a coherent business decision that any shareholder would have upheld, specifically for 2004-2006 the investment activity was higher than the average of 1994-2004, therefore the capital increases were part of the response to the need for additional funding. the company made profits following the investments (even excluding the uso compensation received by correos), an ex-post independent study (from ernst-young) based on ex-ante data concluded that the expected return of the spanish state's investment in correos was greater than its cost of capital at the time of the investment. (321) the commission agrees that the investments financed partially by the spanish state into correos are typical of modernisation measures taken in the postal sector in response to the slowing down of the postal letter market. the decisions of the state were based on multi-annual plans which clearly foresaw an improvement of profitability of correos and that this was further confirmed by the facts. the ernst-young study also confirms that the investment was a rational economic decision at the time. 7.3.2. conclusion (322) the commission takes the view that the 2004-2006 capital injections can be regarded as complying with the meip and therefore does not constitute state aid within the meaning of article 107(1) of the treaty. 7.4. the compensations granted to correos for the organisation of elections 7.4.1. state aid within the meaning of article 107(1) of the treaty 7.4.1.1. measure imputable to the state and granted through state resources (323) the compensation is paid directly from the state general budget and is imputable to the state and granted through state resources. 7.4.1.2. selective economic advantage to an undertaking a. the notion of undertaking (324) it follows from the case-law that article 107 of the treaty does not apply where the state acts by exercising public power (93) or where public entities act in their capacity as public authorities (94). an entity may be deemed to act by exercising public powers where the activity in question is a task that forms part of the essential functions of the state or is connected with those functions by its nature, its aim and the rules to which it is subject (95). generally speaking, unless the member state concerned has decided to introduce market mechanisms, activities that intrinsically form part of the prerogatives of official authority and are performed by the state do not constitute economic activities. (325) in the case at hand, the services provided by correos are part of the state's obligation of regulating and organizing the election procedure, which recognizes the right to vote either in person or via postal ballot. the spanish authorities and/or correos argue that all the activities performed by correos in the context of the organization of elections should be considered to be part of the prerogatives of the state and that therefore correos should not be considered as an undertaking when performing these activities (see recitals 79-81, 118 and 119). (326) the commission considers the activities that are directly related to the voting procedure such as the handling of postal ballots, the sending of materials by the electoral roll office (e.g. voter registration cards) and the collection of electoral documentation once the counting is complete to be part of the essential functions of the state. as a result, the commission agrees with the spanish authorities that those activities cannot be considered as economic activities and that their financing does not amount to state aid, since for those activities correos cannot be considered to constitute an undertaking. (327) however, with respect to the postal handling of electoral material sent out by political candidates, the situation is different. in its decision on poste italiane (96) the commission considered that the distribution of electoral material by poste italiane at a reduced subsidized tariff constituted an economic activity and hence that the compensation for this service amounted to state aid. this measure is very similar to the italian system (i.e. electoral candidates can send pamphlets to voters at reduced tariffs subject to certain conditions and the state compensates the postal operator for the residual cost) and is clearly separable from the non-economic activities directly related to the voting procedure carried out by correos. accordingly, in relation to the postal handling of electoral material sent out by political candidates, correos should be considered to constitute an undertaking for the purposes of article 107(1) of the treaty. (328) given the content of the service, other postal operators could also be able to perform this service in exchange for public compensation (97). this is evidenced by the fact that electoral candidates currently use the system set up by the state (and hence choose correos) to send their pamphlets as they only have to pay a low price per item. however, if they wish to send more than one item per citizen, they have to pay the full price and in such case freely choose to use correos or other postal operators (especially in urban areas) to do so. b. economic advantage (329) the compensation granted to correos for the postal handling of electoral material sent out by political candidates is designed to cover all or part of the net cost incurred by correos in performing the service in question. without that compensation, correos would have to bear those costs itself. the compensation therefore constitutes an advantage to correos since it relieves the latter of a burden it would otherwise need to bear absent that compensation. c. selectivity (330) the measure is clearly selective as it benefits only one undertaking: correos. 7.4.1.3. distortion of competition and effect on trade (331) as explained in recital 204, any measure benefiting correos is liable to affect competition and trade between member states. 7.4.1.4. conclusion (332) the commission considers the financing of the distribution of electoral material for electoral candidates to constitute state aid within the meaning of article 107(1) of the treaty. 7.4.2. existing or new aid (333) according to the spanish authorities and correos (see recitals 83-85 and 121), should financing of the distribution of electoral material for electoral candidates constitute aid, it would be existing aid since it predates the accession of spain to the european economic community in 1986. (334) the spanish authorities explain in particular that the compensation granted to electoral candidates for the distribution of electoral material has been in place since 1977 without undergoing any substantial modifications. (335) based on the information submitted by the spanish authorities, the commission notes that the scheme which dates back to 1977, provided for fixed low tariffs that were applicable to all elections (local, regional, national and union). correos also received for each election partial funding of the full delivery cost over the whole period. (336) the commission concludes that the financing of the distribution of electoral material for electoral candidate qualifies as existing aid within the meaning of article 1(b) of regulation (eu) 2015/1589. 7.4.3. conclusion (337) the compensation granted to correos for the distribution of electoral material sent out by political candidates constitutes existing aid and will be dealt with separately in accordance with articles 17, 18 and 19 of council regulation (ec) no 659/1999 (98). 8. summary conclusions (338) the uso compensations granted to correos under the 1998 postal law, the tax exemptions from the real estate tax (ibi) and the tax on economic activities (iae), and the compensation granted to correos for the distribution of electoral material constitute aid measures within the meaning of article 107(1) of the treaty because they relieved correos of costs that are normally borne by private undertakings. (339) the three capital increases granted in 2004, 2005 and 2006, do not constitute aid within the meaning of article 107(1) of the treaty because the state acted in conformity with the meip. (340) the commission finds that spain unlawfully implemented the aid measures referred to in recital (338) in breach of article 108(3) of the treaty, with the exception of the compensation granted to correos for the distribution of electoral material sent out by political candidates which constitutes existing aid. (341) the uso compensations granted to correos under the 1998 postal law constitutes incompatible aid pursuant to article 106(2) of the treaty to the extent that they overcompensated correos. (342) the tax exemptions from the real estate tax (ibi) and the tax on economic activities (iae) constitute incompatible aid. (343) the compensation granted to correos for the distribution of electoral material sent out by political candidates constitutes existing aid and will be dealt with separately in accordance with articles 17, 18 and 19 of regulation (ec) no 659/1999. 9. recovery (344) according to the treaty and the court's established case-law, the commission is competent to decide that the member state concerned must abolish or alter aid when it has found that it is incompatible with the internal market (99). the court has also consistently held that the obligation on a member state to abolish aid regarded by the commission as being incompatible with the internal market is designed to re-establish the previously existing situation (100). (345) in this context, the court has established that this objective is attained once the recipient has repaid the amounts granted by way of unlawful aid, thus forfeiting the advantage which it had enjoyed over its competitors on the market, and the situation prior to the payment of the aid is restored (101). (346) in line with the case-law, article 16(1) of regulation (eu) 2015/1589 stated that where negative decisions are taken in cases of unlawful aid, the commission shall decide that the member state concerned shall take all necessary measures to recover the aid from the beneficiary [ ]. (347) thus, given that the uso compensations granted to correos under the 1998 postal law (to the extent that they overcompensated correos) and the tax exemptions from the real estate tax (ibi) and the tax on economic activities (iae) were implemented in violation of article 108 of the treaty, and are to be considered as unlawful and incompatible aid, they must be recovered in order to re-establish the situation that existed on the market prior to their granting. (348) the nominal recovery amounts corresponding to the different incompatible aid measures are eur 166,112 million for the uso compensations granted to correos under the 1998 postal law (see recital 267), eur 752 840,50 for the ibi exemptions (see recital 316) and eur 113 591,24 for the iae partial exemptions (see recital 317). (349) recovery should cover the time from when the advantage accrued to the beneficiary, that is to say when the aid was put at the disposal of the beneficiary, until effective recovery, and the sums to be recovered should bear interest until effective recovery. it may also take into account a tax adjustment as mentioned in recitals 268-269. has adopted this decision: article 1 the amount corresponding to eur 317,387 million, granted to correos in the form of universal service obligation compensations under the 1998 postal law, implemented by spain in breach of article 108(3) of the treaty, constitute state aid within the meaning of article 107(1) of the treaty. out of the amount referred to in the previous paragraph, the amount corresponding to eur 166,112 million is incompatible with the internal market, since it constitutes overcompensation to correos. article 2 the state aid, amounting to eur 752 840,50, granted to correos in the form of a real estate tax (impuesto sobre bienes inmuebles) exemption, unlawfully implemented by spain in breach of article 108(3) of the treaty is incompatible with the internal market. article 3 the state aid, amounting to eur 113 591,24, granted to correos in the form of a tax on economic activities (impuesto de actividades econ micas) partial exemption, unlawfully implemented by spain in breach of article 108(3) of the treaty is incompatible with the internal market. article 4 the capital contributions into correos made by spain in 2004, 2005 and 2006 do not constitute aid within the meaning of article 107(1) of the treaty. article 5 the state aid in the form of compensation granted to correos for the distribution of electoral material constitutes existing aid within the meaning of article 1(b) of regulation (eu) 2015/1589. article 6 1. spain shall recover the incompatible aid granted under the measures referred to in articles 1, 2 and 3. 2. the amount of state aid referred in article 1, second subparagraph, can be further reduced by deducting the tax that has been paid on the aid received on condition that the beneficiary will not be able to enjoy a further tax deduction as referred to in paragraph 50 of the recovery notice. 3. the sums to be recovered shall bear interest from the date on which they were put at the disposal of the beneficiary until their actual recovery. 4. the interest shall be calculated on a compound basis in accordance with chapter v of regulation (ec) no 794/2004. 5. spain shall cancel all outstanding payments of the aid referred to in articles 1, 2 and 3 with effect from the date of adoption of this decision. article 7 1. recovery of the aid referred to in articles 1, 2 and 3 shall be immediate and effective. 2. spain shall ensure that this decision is implemented within four months following the date of its notification. article 8 1. within two months following notification of this decision, spain shall submit the following information to the commission: (a) the total amount (principal and recovery interests) to be recovered from the beneficiary; (b) a detailed description of the measures already taken and planned to comply with this decision; (c) documents demonstrating that the beneficiary has been ordered to repay the aid. 2. spain shall keep the commission informed of the progress of the national measures taken to implement this decision until recovery of the aid referred to in articles 1, 2 and 3 has been completed. it shall immediately submit, on simple request by the commission, information on the measures already taken and planned to comply with this decision. it shall also provide detailed information concerning the amounts of aid and recovery interest already recovered from the beneficiary. article 9 this decision is addressed to the kingdom of spain. done at brussels, 10 july 2018. for the commission margrethe vestager member of the commission (1) oj c 129, 12.4.2016, p. 10. (2) cf. footnote 1. (3) directive 97/67/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 15 december 1997 on common rules for the development of the internal market of community postal services and the improvement of quality of service (oj l 15, 21.1.1998, p. 14). (4) additional provision and article 15(2) of the 1998 postal law lists the following services included within the scope of the universal postal service: (1) money order services; (2) the regular provision of national and international postal services for postal items that incorporate an address indicated by the sender on the item itself or on its packaging. these might be: (a) letters and postcards containing written communications, up to 2 kg; (b) parcels, with or without economic value, up to 10 kg. (5) article 18 of the 1998 postal law defines reserved area as the following: money order services; the clearance, sorting, transport and distribution of inter-city items, certified or not, and of letters and postcards, up to 100 grams (from 1 january 2006, the weight limit was set at 50 grams); the cross-border postal services (sent to or received from another state), including letters and postcards sent and received, with the above limitations in terms of price, weight and date; the receipt of applications, letters and communications that citizens addressed to the bodies of the public administration. (6) directive 2002/39/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 10 june 2002 amending directive 97/67/ec with regard to the further opening to competition of community postal services (oj l 176, 5.7.2002, p. 21). (7) directive 2008/6/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 20 february 2008 amending directive 97/67/ec with regard to the full accomplishment of the internal market of community postal services (oj l 52, 27.2.2008, p. 3). (8) case c-280/00 altmark trans gmbh and regierungspr sidium magdeburg v nahverkehrsgesellschaft altmark gmbh eu:c:2003:415. (9) communication from the commission: european framework for state aid in the form of public service compensation (oj c 8, 11.1.2012, p. 15). (10) final report on costing and financing of universal service obligations in the postal sector in the european union, november 1998, national economic research associates (nera). http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/post/doc/studies/1998-nera_en.pdf (11) see judgement of the court of justice of 16 march 2006, c-234/04, kapferer, ecli:eu:c:2006:178, paragraphs 20 and 21; judgement of the court of justice of 6 october 2009, c40/08, asturcom telecomunicaciones, ecli:eu:c: 2009:615; judgement of the court of justice of 11 november 2015, c-505/14, klausner holz niedersachsen, ecli:eu:c:2015:742, paragraphs 36 and 45. (12) judgement of the court of justice of 3 july 2003, joint cases c-83/01 p, c-93/01 p and c-94/01 p, chronopost/ufex and others, ecli:eu:c2003:388 (13) judgement of the court of justice of 1 july 2008, joint cases c-341-06 and c-342/06p, chronopost and la poste/ufex and others, ecli:eu:c2008:375 (14) judgement of the spanish supreme court of 2 october 2006, rec. 89/2004. (15) commission decision 2012/21/eu of 20 december 2011 on the application of article 106(2) of the treaty on the functioning of the european union to state aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest (oj l 7, 11.1.2012, p. 3). (16) the commission notes that some of these issues do not appear to constitute state aid issues (e.g. alleged predatory pricing), that others do not seem to relate directly to correos (e.g. alleged cross-subsidization of correos express) and that the facts do not seem to be established regarding others (e.g. alleged compensation to finance correos' publicity and communication campaigns). (17) the anonymous party also refers to the increase of the scope of the uso by the 2010 postal law to parcels up to 20 kg as an indication of correos interest in expanding its business in order to compete, taking advantage of its position as uso, with the rest of the parcels service companies in the spanish parcels service market. (18) the commission will assess the uso compensations to correos under the 2010 postal law in another decision (see recital 32). (19) case c-280/00 altmark trans gmbh and regierungspr sidium magdeburg v nahverkehrsgesellschaft altmark gmbh ecli:eu:c:2003:415. (20) see commission decision 2009/554/ec of 21 october 2008 on a state aid scheme implemented by italy to renumerate poste italiane for distributing postal savings certificates (c 49/06 (ex nn 65/06)) (oj l 189, 21.7.2009, p. 3). (21) case t-613/97, ufex and others v commission, ecli:eu:t:2006:150 (22) published by the commission on 18 february 2013 (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/overview/new_guide_eu_rules_procurement_en.pdf) (23) commission decision 2012/321/eu of 25 january 2012, on the measure sa.14588(c20/09) implemented by belgium in favour of de post la poste (now bpost) (oj l 170, 29.6.2012, p. 1). (24) see for instance commission decision of 28 march 2012 in case sa.33054 (2012/n) compensation for net costs incurred to keep a non-commercially viable network for the period 2012-2015 and the continuation of a working capital facility (oj c 121, 26.4.2012, p. 1) and commission decision 2012/636/eu of 25 january 2012 measures c36/07 (ex nn 25/07) implemented by germany for deutsche post ag (oj l 289, 19.10.2012, p. 1). (25) case c-124/10 p, commission v edf, eclu:eu:c:2012:318. (26) judgement of the court of justice of 3 july 2003, joint cases c-83/01 p, c-93/01 p and c-94/01 p, chronopost/ufex and others, ecli:eu:c2003:388. (27) judgement of the court of justice of 1 july 2008, joint cases c-341-06 and c-342/06p, chronopost and la poste/ufex and others, ecli:eu:c2008:375. (28) commission decision 98/365/ec of 1 october 1997 concerning alleged state aid granted by france to smfi-chronopost (oj l 164, 9.6.1998, p. 37). (*1) confidential information. (29) comisi n nacional de los mercados y la competencia: the cnmc will adopt resolutions once the net cost of the universal postal service and the unfair burden has been established for these different years. (30) c-460/07, sandra puffer v unabh ngiger finanzsenat, au enstelle linz, ecli:eu:c:2009:254 (31) commission decision 2011/3/eu of 24 february 2010 concerning public transport service contracts between the danish ministry of transport and danske statsbaner (case 41/08 (ex nn 35/08)) (oj l 7, 11.1.2011, p. 1). (32) the cost allocation methodology consists in calculating the net cost of a public service obligation such as the uso) as the costs incurred minus the revenues obtained when discharging the public service obligations. under the cost allocation methodology, a reasonable profit can be added to that net cost to calculate the maximum amount of allowable compensation. (33) the return on sales is a profitability measure, also known as operating profit margin. it is calculated as the ratio between net operating profit (before interest and tax) and sales revenues. more precisely, net operating profit is the difference between revenues and costs at operational level. (34) case t-358/94 compagnie nationale air france v commission of the european communities eu:t:1996:194, paragraph 56. (35) case 248/84 federal republic of germany v commission of the european communities eu:c:1987:437, paragraph 17; and joined cases t-92/00 and t-103/00 territorio hist rico de lava diputaci n foral de lava (t-92/00), ramond n, sa and ramond n c psulas, sa (t-103/00) v commission of the european communities eu:t:2002:61, paragraph 57. (36) joined cases c-180/98 to c-184/98 pavel pavlov and others v stichting pensioenfonds medische specialisten eu:c:2000:428, paragraph 74. (37) case c-41/90 h fner & fritz elser v macrotron gmbh eu:c:1991:161, paragraph 21 and joined cases c-180/98 to c-184/98 pavel pavlov and others v stichting pensioenfonds medische specialisten eu:c:2000:428, paragraph 74. (38) case c-118/85 commission of the european communities v italian republic eu:c:1987:283, paragraph 7. (39) case c-82/01 p a roports de paris v commission of the european communities eu:c:2002:617, paragraph 74; and case c-49/07 motosykletistiki omospondia ellados npid (motoe) v elliniko dimosio eu:c:2008:376, paragraph 25. see also communication from the commission on the application of the european union state aid rules to compensation granted for the provision of services of general economic interest (2012/c 8/02), paragraph 9. (40) case c-49/07 motosykletistiki omospondia ellados npid (motoe) v elliniko dimosio eu:c:2008:376, paragraph 27; and case c-244/94 f d ration fran aise des soci t s d'assurance, soci t paternelle-vie, union des assurances de paris-vie and caisse d'assurance et de pr voyance mutuelle des agriculteurs v minist re de l'agriculture et de la p che eu:c:1995:392, paragraph 21. (41) case c-39/94 syndicat fran ais de l'express international (sfei) and others v la poste and others eu:c:1996:285, paragraph 60; and case c-342/96 kingdom of spain v commission of the european communities eu:c:1999:210, paragraph 41. (42) case c-173/73 italian republic v commission of the european communities eu:c:1974:71, paragraph 13. (43) case c-280/00 altmark trans gmbh and regierungspr sidium magdeburg v nahverkehrsgesellschaft altmark gmbh eu:c:2003:415. (44) see paragraphs 71-82 of the 2016 opening decision. (45) see recitals 296-320 of decision 2012/321/eu. (46) in the case of bpost a reasonable profit level of 4,8 % was applied for the years 2004 and 2005 and of 7,4 % ros for the years 2006-2010. on the basis of these reasonable profit levels the commission concluded that bpost had been overcompensated which led to the recovery of eur 417 million (see http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_ip-12-45_en.htm). (47) given that the comments of the spanish state and correos are very convergent, the commission will refer to comments made by the spanish authorities and/or correos in the following of the document. in most cases, the same comment is made by both parties. in some cases, it is only made by one of them. (48) communication from the commission: european framework for state aid in the form of public service compensation (2005) (oj c 297, 29.11.2005, p. 4). (49) see in particular decision 2012/321/eu and decision 2012/636/eu. (50) see footnote 2 of paragraph 21 of the 2012 sgei framework. this cost allocation methodology is described in paragraphs 28 et seq. of the 2012 sgei framework. (51) see judgment of the court of justice of 22 december 2008, british aggregates v commission, c-487/06 p, ecli:eu:c:2008:757, paragraph 111. (52) as for example described in the commission staff working document accompanying the report from the commission to the european parliament and the council on the application of the postal services directive and in particular the annex on the calculation of the net cost of the postal universal service obligation. further guidance can be found in the commission's state aid decision practice since 2012. (53) see for example commission decision of 4 december 2015 in case sa.43243 (2015/n) state compensations granted to poste italiane spa for the delivery of the universal postal service over the periods 2012-2015 and 2016-2019 (oj c 104, 18.3.2016, p. 1)., commission decision of 1 august 2014 in case sa.35608 (2014/c) implemented by greece in favour of hellenic post (elta) (oj c 348, 3.10.2014, p. 48). commission decision of 5 august 2016 in case sa.38869 (2014/n) compensation of poczta polska for the net cost of uso 2013-2015 (oj c 284, 5.8.2016, p. 1). (54) case c-471/09 p diputaci n foral de vizcaya and others v commission, ecli:eu:c:2011:521, paragraph 65. (55) press releases, publication of decisions on its website. (56) see footnote 53. (57) e.g. hellenic post, poste italiane. (58) see commission decision of 20 november 2012 in case sa.33989 (2012/nn) implemented by italy in favour of poste italiane (oj c 77, 15.3.2013, p. 12) and commission decision in case sa.35608 (2014/c) implemented by greece in favour of hellenic post (elta). (59) see paragraph 50 of the commission decision in case sa.33989 (2012/nn) implemented by italy in favour of poste italiane. (60) case 730/79 philip morris holland bv v commission of the european communities eu:c:1980:209, paragraph 11; and joined cases t-298/97, t-312/97, t-313/97, t-315/97, t-600/97 to 607/97, t-1/98, t-3/98 to t-6/98 and t-23/98 alzetta mauro and others v commission of the european communities eu:t:2000:151, paragraph 80. (61) case 730/79 philip morris holland bv v commission of the european communities, eu:c:1980:209 paragraphs 11 and 12; and case t-214/95 het vlaamse gewest (flemish region) v commission of the european communities eu:t:1998:77, paragraphs 48-50. (62) council regulation (eu) 2015/1589 of 13 july 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of article 108 of the treaty on the functioning of the european union (oj l 248, 24.9.2015, p. 9). (63) case c-44/93 namur-les assurances eu:c:1994:311, paragraphs 28 and 35. (64) see joined cases t-195/01 and t-207/01 government of gibraltar v commission eu:t:2002:111, paragraph 111. (65) according to article 4 of commission regulation (ec) no 794/2004 of 21 april 2004 implementing council regulation (eu) 2015/1589 laying down detailed rules for the application of article 108 of the treaty on the functioning of the european union (oj l 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1), modifications of a purely formal or administrative nature which cannot affect the evaluation of the compatibility of the aid measure with the common market as well as an increase in the original budget of an existing aid scheme by up to 20 % shall not be considered an alteration to existing aid. (66) for example, if the uso services were loss making but overall the company was profit making, no compensation was to be granted while some could be granted after the change. alternatively, if the company would be loss-making overall with a very profitable uso, it could receive compensation. (67) decision 2012/21/eu. (68) community framework for state aid in the form of public service compensation, (oj c 297, 29.11.2005, p. 4). (69) commission decision 2005/842/ec of 28 november 2005 on the application of article 86(2) of the ec treaty to state aid in the form of public service compensation granted to certain undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest (oj l 312, 29.11.2005, p. 67). (70) see paragraph 11 of the 2012 sgei framework. (71) see recital 28. (72) the provision could apply to a measure starting in the past and still ongoing. in such case, a modification or even termination of the entrustment could possibly be requested. (73) see for example la poste (france), poste italiane (italy) and elta (greece): all 15 years. (74) commission directive 2006/111/ec of 16 november 2006 on the transparency of financial relations between member states and public undertakings as well as on financial transparency within certain undertakings (oj l 318, 17.11.2006, p.17). (75) see paragraph 31 of the 2012 sgei framework. (76) see paragraph 44 of the 2012 sgei framework. (77) see in particular decision 2012/321/eu and decision 2012/636/eu. (78) see footnote 31. even if dividends were taken into account in that case, the commission also indicated in paragraph 345 of the decision, the commission notably indicated that dividend policy cannot be equated with a refund clause which makes it possible to adjust compensation for the fulfilment of a public service obligation and to prevent overcompensation. (79) the spanish authorities have indicated their intention to request a fiscal adjustment for the calculation of the recovery amount. (80) notice from the commission towards an effective implementation of commission decisions ordering member states to recover unlawful and incompatible state aid, oj c 272, 15.11.2007, p. 4 17 (81) case c-387/92, banco exterior de espa a, eu:c:1994:100, paragraph 14. (82) judgment of the general court of 12 december 1996, air france v commission, t-358/94, ecli:eu:t:1996:194, paragraph 62. (83) case c-280/00 altmark trans eu:c:2003:415, paragraph 84. (84) case 30/59 de gezamenlijke steenkolenmijnen in limburg v high authority of the european coal and steel community eu:c:1961:2, p. 19; and case c-143/99 adria-wien pipeline eu:c:2001:598, paragraph 38. (85) joined cases c-78/08 to c-80/08, paint graphos and others eu:c:2011:550, paras 49 et seq. (86) see case c-143/99 adria-wien pipeline eu:c:2001:598. (87) cases t-211/04 and t-215/04, commission and spain v government of gibraltar and united kingdom eu:t:2008:595, para 80. (88) administrative concession over the property itself or over the public services for which the property is used, right in rem to a tenancy, right in rem to usufruct and right of ownership. (89) see, inter alia, case c-88/03 portugal v. commission eu:c:2006:511, paragraph 56; joined cases c-78/08 to c-80/08 paint graphos eu:c:2011:550, paragraph 49. (90) see, inter alia, case c-88/03 portugal v. commission eu:c:2006:511, paragraph 56; joined cases c-78/08 to c-80/08 paint graphos, eu:c:2011:550, paragraph 49. (91) the exceptions provided for in article 107(2) of the treaty concern: (a) aid of a social character granted to individual consumers; (b) aid to make good the damage caused by natural disasters or exceptional occurrences; and (c) aid granted to certain areas of the federal republic of germany. (92) the exceptions provided for in article 107(3) of the treaty concern: (a) aid to promote the development of certain areas; (b) aid for certain important projects of common european interest or to remedy a serious disturbance in the economy of the member state; (c) aid to develop certain economic activities or areas; (d) aid to promote culture and heritage conservation; and (e) aid specified by a council decision (93) case 118/85 commission v italy eu:c:1987:283, paragraphs 7 and 8. (94) case c-30/87 bodson eu:c:1988:225, paragraph 18. (95) see, in particular, case c-364/92 sat eu:c:1994:7, paragraph 30 and case c-343/95 cal & figli eu:c:1997:160, paragraphs 22 to 23. (96) see commission decision in case sa.33989 (2012/nn) implemented by italy in favour of poste italiane. (97) indeed, according to paragraph 13 of the commission's sgei communication: [t]he decision of an authority not to allow third parties to provide a certain service (for example, because it wishes to provide the service in-house) does not rule out the existence of an economic activity. (98) council regulation (ec) no 659/1999 of 22 march 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of article 108 of the treaty on the functioning of the european union (oj l 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1). (99) see case c-70/72 commission v germany [1973] ecr 813, paragraph 13. (100) see joined cases c-278/92, c-279/92 and c-280/92 spain v commission [1994] ecr i-4103, paragraph 75. (101) see case c-75/97 belgium v commission [1999] ecr i-030671 paragraphs 64 and 65.

name: council implementing decision (cfsp) 2019/87 of 21 january 2019 implementing decision 2013/255/cfsp concerning restrictive measures against syria type: decision_impl subject matter: international affairs; european construction; civil law; asia and oceania date published: 2019-01-21 21.1.2019 en official journal of the european union li 18/13 council implementing decision (cfsp) 2019/87 of 21 january 2019 implementing decision 2013/255/cfsp concerning restrictive measures against syria the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on european union, and in particular article 31(2) thereof, having regard to council decision 2013/255/cfsp of 31 may 2013 concerning restrictive measures against syria (1) and in particular article 30(1) thereof, having regard to the proposal from the high representative of the union for foreign affairs and security policy, whereas: (1) on 31 may 2013, the council adopted decision 2013/255/cfsp. (2) in view of the fact that prominent businessmen are making large profits through their ties with the regime and are helping to finance the regime in return, including through the joint ventures formed by certain prominent businessmen and entities with state-backed companies to develop expropriated land, those businessmen and entities are supporting and benefiting from the assad regime including through the use of expropriated property. (3) furthermore, the expropriation of land by the assad regime from persons displaced by the conflict in syria prevents those persons from being able to return to their homes. (4) eleven natural persons and five entities should be added to the list of natural and legal persons, entities or bodies subject to restrictive measures in annex i to decision 2013/255/cfsp. (5) decision 2013/255/cfsp should therefore be amended accordingly, has adopted this decision: article 1 annex i to decision 2013/255/cfsp is amended as set out in the annex to this decision. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at brussels, 21 january 2019. for the council the president f. mogherini (1) oj l 147, 1.6.2013, p. 14. annex 1. the following persons are added to the list set out in section a (persons) of annex i to decision 2013/255/cfsp: name identifying information reasons date of listing 264. anas talas (a.k.a. ; anas talous/tals/tuls/tlass) gender: male position: chairman of the talas group date of birth: 25 march 1971 nationality: syrian leading businessperson operating in syria, with interests and activities in multiple sectors of syria's economy. through his business activities and investments, anas talas also benefits from and/or supports the syrian regime. in 2018 the talas group, chaired by anas talas, entered into a syp 23 billion joint venture with damascus cham holding for the construction of marota city, a regime-backed luxury residential and commercial development. 21.1.2019 265. nazir ahmad jamaleddine (a.k.a. ; nazir ahmad, mohammed jamaleddine) gender: male position: cofounder and majority shareholder of apex development and projects llc and founder of a'ayan company for projects and equipment date of birth: 1962 nationality: syrian leading businessperson operating in syria with significant investments in the construction industry, including a controlling 90 % stake in apex development and projects llc, which has entered into a usd 34,8 million joint venture for the construction of marota city, a regime-backed luxury residential and commercial development. through his participation in the marota city development, nazir ahmad jamaleddine benefits from and/or supports the syrian regime. 21.1.2019 266. mazin al-tarazi (a.k.a. ; mazen al-tarazi) gender: male position: businessperson date of birth: september 1962 nationality: syrian leading businessperson operating in syria, with significant investments in the construction and aviation sectors. through his investments and activities, mazin al-tarazi benefits from and/or supports the syrian regime. in particular, al-tarazi has concluded a deal with damascus cham holdings for a usd 320 million investment in the construction of marota city, a regime-backed luxury residential and commercial development; he has also been granted a licence for a private airline in syria. 21.1.2019 267. samer foz (a.k.a. samir () foz ()/fawz; samer zuhair foz) gender: male position: ceo of aman group date of birth: may 1973 place of birth: latakia, syria nationalities: syrian, turkish other information: executive president of aman group. subsidiaries: foz for trading, al-mohaimen for transportation & contracting. aman group is the private sector partner in joint venture aman damascus jsc with damascus cham holding, in which foz is an individual shareholder. emmar industries is a joint venture between aman group and the hamisho group, in which foz has the majority stake and is the chairman. leading businessperson operating in syria, with interests and activities in multiple sectors of syria's economy, including a regime-backed joint venture involved in the development of marota city, a luxury residential and commercial development. samer foz provides financial and other support to the regime, including funding the military security shield forces in syria and brokering grain deals. he also benefits financially from access to commercial opportunities through the wheat trade and reconstruction projects as a result of his links to the regime. 21.1.2019 268. khaldoun al-zoubi (a.k.a. khaldoon al-zu'bi; khaldoun zubi) gender: male position: vice-president of aman holding (a.k.a. aman group) date of birth: 1979 nationality: syrian leading businessperson operating in syria, with interests and activities in multiple sectors of syria's economy; including his roles as vice president of aman holding and majority shareholder of fly aman airline. in this capacity, he is linked to samer foz. aman holding is represented on the board of, and holds a majority stake in, aman damascus, a joint venture in the construction of marota city, a regime-backed luxury residential and commercial development. al-zoubi benefits from and/or supports the regime through his position as vice president of aman holding. 21.1.2019 269. hussam al-qatirji (a.k.a. hussam/hossam ahmed/mohammed/muhammad al-katerji ) gender: male position: ceo of katerji group (a.k.a. al-qatirji company/qatirji company/ khatirji group/katerji international group) date of birth: 1982 place of birth: raqqa, syria nationality: syrian leading businessperson operating in syria, who is also a member of parliament for aleppo. al-qatirji supports and benefits from the regime through enabling, and profiting from, trade deals with the regime in relation to oil and wheat. 21.1.2019 270. bashar mohammad assi gender: male position: chairman of the board of directors of aman damascus. founding partner of fly aman limited liability airline. date of birth: 1977 nationality: syrian leading businessperson operating in syria, with interests and activities in multiple sectors of syria's economy, including his roles as founding partner of fly aman airline and chairman of the board of directors of aman damascus; a joint venture involved in the development of marota city, a regime-backed luxury residential and commercial development. assi benefits from and/or supports the regime through his position as chairman of the board of directors of aman damascus. 21.1.2019 271. khaled al-zubaidi (a.k.a. (mohammed) khaled/khalid (bassam) (al-) zubaidi/zubedi ) gender: male position: co-owner of zubaidi and qalei llc, director of agar investment company, general manager of al zubaidi company and al zubaidi & al taweet contracting company, director and owner of zubaidi development company, and co-owner of enjaz investment company. nationality: syrian leading businessperson operating in syria, with significant investments in the construction industry, including a 50 % stake in zubaidi and qalei llc, which is constructing the luxury tourist city grand town and to which the regime has granted a 45-year agreement in return for 19-21 % of its revenue. in this capacity he is linked to nader qalei. khaled al-zubaidi benefits from and/or supports the regime through his business activities, in particular through this stake in the grand town development. 21.1.2019 272. hayan mohammad nazem qaddour (a.k.a. hayyan kaddour bin mohammed nazem) gender: male name: hayan mohammed nazem qaddour position: primary shareholder of exceed development and investment company date of birth: 1970 nationality: syrian leading businessperson operating in syria, who holds a 67 % stake in exceed development and investment, which has entered into a usd 17,7 million joint venture for the construction of marota city, a regime-backed luxury residential and commercial development. through his participation in the marota city development, hayan mohammad nazem qaddour benefits from and/or supports the syrian regime. 21.1.2019 273. maen rizk allah haykal (a.k.a. heikal bin rizkallah) gender: male position: secondary shareholder of exceed development and investment company nationality: syrian leading businessperson operating in syria, who holds a 33 % stake in exceed development and investment, which has entered into a usd 17,7 million joint venture for the construction of marota city, a regime-backed luxury residential and commercial development. through the participation in the marota city development, maen rizk allah haykal benefits from and/or supports the syrian regime. 21.1.2019 274. nader qalei (a.k.a. kalai, kalei) gender: male name: nader kalai date of birth: 9.7.1965 place of birth: damascus nationality: syrian passport number (including country that issued and date and place of issue): syrian arab republic, n 010170320, issue number: 002-15-l062672, date of issue: 24.5.2015, date of expiry: 23.5.2021; id number: syrian arab republic, 010-40036453. position: majority shareholder of castle investment holding, co-owner of zubaidi and qalei llc, chairman of kalai industries management relatives/business associates or partners/links to listed individuals: khaled al-zubaidi address: young avenue, halifax, canada leading businessperson operating in syria, with significant investments in the construction industry, including a 50 % stake in zubaidi and qalei llc, which is constructing the luxury tourist city grand town and to which the regime has granted a 45-year agreement in return for 19-21 % of its revenue. in this capacity, he is linked to khaled al-zubaidi. nader qalei benefits from and/or supports the regime through his business activities, in particular through this stake in the grand town development. 21.1.2019 2. the following entities are added to the list set out in section b (entities) of annex i to decision 2013/255/cfsp: name identifying information reasons date of listing 72. rawafed damascus private joint stock company (a.k.a. rawafed/rawafid/rawafed (tributary) damascus private joint stock company) address: damascus, syria rawafed damascus private joint stock company is a usd 48,3 million joint venture between damascus cham holdings, ramak development and humanitarian projects, al-ammar llc, timeet trading llc (also referred to as ultimate trading co. ltd.), and wings private jsc. rawafed supports and/or benefits from the syrian regime, including through its participation in the regime-backed luxury development marota city. 21.1.2019 73. aman damascus joint stock company (a.k.a. aman damascus jsc) address: damascus, syria aman damascus joint stock company is a usd 18,9 million joint venture between damascus cham holdings and aman group. through its participation in the regime-backed luxury development marota city, aman damascus supports and/or benefits from the syrian regime. 21.1.2019 74. bunyan damascus private joint stock company (a.k.a. bunyan damascus private jsc) address: damascus, syria bunyan damascus private joint stock company is a usd 34,8 million joint venture between damascus cham holdings and apex development and projects llc and tamayoz llc. through its participation in the regime-backed luxury development marota city, bunyan damascus private joint stock company supports and/or benefits from the syrian regime. 21.1.2019 75. mirza address: damascus, syria mirza is a usd 52,7 million joint venture between damascus cham holding and talas group. through its participation in the regime-backed luxury development marota city, mirza supports and/or benefits from the syrian regime. 21.1.2019 76. developers private joint stock company (a.k.a. developers private jsc) address: damascus, syria developers private joint stock company is a usd 17,7 million joint venture between damascus cham holdings and exceed development and investment. through its participation in the regime-backed luxury development marota city, developers private joint stock company supports and/or benefits from the syrian regime. 21.1.2019

name: council decision (eu) 2019/75 of 20 december 2018 on the conclusion, on behalf of the union, of the agreement between the european union and antigua and barbuda amending the agreement between the european community and antigua and barbuda on the short-stay visa waiver type: decision subject matter: international law; european construction; america; international affairs date published: 2019-01-21 21.1.2019 en official journal of the european union l 18/1 council decision (eu) 2019/75 of 20 december 2018 on the conclusion, on behalf of the union, of the agreement between the european union and antigua and barbuda amending the agreement between the european community and antigua and barbuda on the short-stay visa waiver the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular point (a) of article 77(2), in conjunction with point (a)(v) of the second subparagraph of article 218(6) thereof, having regard to the proposal from the european commission, having regard to the consent of the european parliament (1), whereas: (1) by its decision 2009/896/ec (2), the council concluded the agreement between the european community and antigua and barbuda on the short-stay visa waiver (3) (the agreement). the agreement provides for visa-free travel for the citizens of the union and for the citizens of antigua and barbuda when travelling to the territory of the other contracting party for a maximum period of three months during a six months period. (2) regulation (eu) no 610/2013 of the european parliament and of the council (4) introduced horizontal changes in the union's visa and border acquis and defined a short stay as a maximum of 90 days in any 180-day period. (3) it is necessary to incorporate this new definition into the agreement in order to fully harmonise the union's short-stay regime. (4) the commission has negotiated, on behalf of the union, an agreement with antigua and barbuda which amends the agreement between the european community and antigua and barbuda on the short-stay visa waiver (the amending agreement). (5) in accordance with council decision (eu) 2017/2083 (5), the amending agreement has been signed. (6) this decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the schengen acquis in which the united kingdom does not take part, in accordance with council decision 2000/365/ec (6); the united kingdom is therefore not taking part in the adoption of this decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application. (7) this decision constitutes a development of the provisions of the schengen acquis in which ireland does not take part, in accordance with council decision 2002/192/ec (7); ireland is therefore not taking part in the adoption of this decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application. (8) the amending agreement should be approved, has adopted this decision: article 1 the agreement between the european union and antigua and barbuda amending the agreement between the european community and antigua and barbuda on the short-stay visa waiver is hereby approved on behalf of the union. the text of the amending agreement is attached to this decision. article 2 the president of the council shall, on behalf of the union, give the notification provided for in article 2 of the amending agreement (8). article 3 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at brussels, 20 december 2018. for the council the president e. k stinger (1) consent given on 23 october 2018. (2) council decision 2009/896/ec of 30 november 2009 on the conclusion of the agreement between the european community and antigua and barbuda on the short-stay visa waiver (oj l 321, 8.12.2009, p. 38). (3) oj l 169, 30.6.2009, p. 3. (4) regulation (eu) no 610/2013 of the european parliament and of the council of 26 june 2013 amending regulation (ec) no 562/2006 of the european parliament and of the council establishing a community code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (schengen borders code), the convention implementing the schengen agreement, council regulations (ec) no 1683/95 and (ec) no 539/2001 and regulations (ec) no 767/2008 and (ec) no 810/2009 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 182, 29.6.2013, p. 1). (5) council decision (eu) 2017/2083 of 6 november 2017 on the signing, on behalf of the union, of the agreement between the european union and antigua and barbuda amending the agreement between the european community and antigua and barbuda on the shortstay visa waiver (oj l 297, 15.11.2017, p. 1). (6) council decision 2000/365/ec of 29 may 2000 concerning the request of the united kingdom of great britain and northern ireland to take part in some of the provisions of the schengen acquis (oj l 131, 1.6.2000, p. 43). (7) council decision 2002/192/ec of 28 february 2002 concerning ireland's request to take part in some of the provisions of the schengen acquis (oj l 64, 7.3.2002, p. 20). (8) the date of entry into force of the amending agreement will be published in the official journal of the european union by the general secretariat of the council. annex declaration of the union concerning the entry into force of regulation (eu) 2017/2226 establishing the entry/exit system (ees) and the member states applying the schengen acquis in full regulation (eu) 2017/2226 of the european parliament and of the council of 30 november 2017 establishing an entry/exit system (ees) to register entry and exit data and refusal of entry data of third-country nationals crossing the external borders of the member states and determining the conditions for access to the ees for law enforcement purposes, and amending the convention implementing the schengen agreement and regulations (ec) no 767/2008 and (eu) no 1077/2011 entered into force on 29 december 2017. as a consequence, as from the date of application of regulation (eu) 2017/2226 (1) for the purposes of this agreement member states applying the schengen acquis in full will mean member states operating the entry/exit system at the external borders. the maximum period of 90 days in any 180-day period will be calculated taking into account the period of stay in all the member states operating the entry/exit system at the external borders. (1) the date of application will be decided by the commission in accordance with article 73 of regulation (eu) 2017/2226.

name: commission decision (eu) 2019/61 of 19 december 2018 on the sectoral reference document on best environmental management practices, sector environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence for the public administration sector under regulation (ec) no 1221/2009 on the voluntary participation by organisations in a community eco-management and audit scheme (emas)text with eea relevance. type: decision subject matter: business organisation; environmental policy; legal form of organisations; management; executive power and public service date published: 2019-01-18 18.1.2019 en official journal of the european union l 17/1 commission decision (eu) 2019/61 of 19 december 2018 on the sectoral reference document on best environmental management practices, sector environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence for the public administration sector under regulation (ec) no 1221/2009 on the voluntary participation by organisations in a community eco-management and audit scheme (emas) (text with eea relevance) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to regulation (ec) no 1221/2009 of the european parliament and of the council of 25 november 2009 on the voluntary participation by organisations in a community eco-management and audit scheme (emas), repealing regulation (ec) no 761/2001 and commission decisions 2001/681/ec and 2006/193/ec (1), and in particular article 46(1) thereof, whereas: (1) regulation (ec) no 1221/2009 obliges the commission to develop sectoral reference documents for specific economic sectors. the documents must include best environmental management practice, environmental performance indicators and, where appropriate, benchmarks of excellence and rating systems identifying environmental performance levels. organisations registered or preparing to become registered under the eco-management and audit scheme established by that regulation are required to take those documents into account when developing their environmental management system and when assessing their environmental performance in their environmental statement, or updated environmental statement, prepared in accordance with annex iv to that regulation. (2) regulation (ec) no 1221/2009 required the commission to establish a working plan setting out an indicative list of sectors to be considered priority sectors for the adoption of sectoral and cross-sectoral reference documents. communication from the commission establishment of the working plan setting out an indicative list of sectors for the adoption of sectoral and cross-sectoral reference documents, under regulation (ec) no 1221/2009 on the voluntary participation of organisations in a community eco-management and audit scheme (emas) (2) identified the public administration sector as a priority sector. (3) given the variety of activities carried out by the different public administrations across the union, the sectoral reference document for the public administration sector should focus on the key environmental issues for the sector. it should identify, by way of best environmental management practice for the sector, concrete actions to improve office management, energy and resource efficiency, mobility, land use, air quality, water supply and waste water management, with a view to fostering a more circular economy. (4) in order to allow organisations, environmental verifiers and others sufficient time to prepare for introduction of the sectoral reference document for the public administration sector, the date of application of this decision should be deferred by a period of 120 days from the date of its publication in the official journal of the european union. (5) in developing the sectoral reference document annexed to this decision, the commission has consulted with member states and other stakeholders in accordance with regulation (ec) no 1221/2009. (6) the measures provided for in this decision are in accordance with the opinion of the committee established by article 49 of regulation (ec) no 1221/2009, has adopted this decision: article 1 the sectoral reference document on best environmental management practices, sector environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence for the public administration sector for the purposes of regulation (ec) no 1221/2009 is set out in the annex to this decision. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the official journal of the european union. it shall apply from 18 may 2019. done at brussels, 19 december 2018. for the commission the president jean-claude juncker (1) oj l 342, 22.12.2009, p. 1. (2) oj c 358, 8.12.2011, p. 2. annex 1. introduction this sectoral reference document (srd) is based on a detailed scientific and policy report (1) (best practice report) developed by the european commissions joint research centre (jrc). relevant legal background the community eco-management and audit scheme (emas) was introduced in 1993, for voluntary participation by organisations, by council regulation (eec) no 1836/93 (2). subsequently, emas has undergone two major revisions: regulation (ec) no 761/2001 of the european parliament and of the council (3), regulation (ec) no 1221/2009. an important new element of the latest revision, which came into force on 11 january 2010, is article 46 on the development of srds. the srds have to include best environmental management practices (bemps), environmental performance indicators for the specific sectors and, where appropriate, benchmarks of excellence and rating systems identifying performance levels. how to understand and use this document the eco-management and audit scheme (emas) is a scheme for voluntary participation by organisations committed to continuous environmental improvement. within this framework, this srd provides sector-specific guidance to the public administration sector and points out a number of options for improvement as well as best practices. the document was written by the european commission using input from stakeholders. a technical working group, comprising experts and stakeholders of the sector, led by the jrc, discussed and ultimately agreed on the best environmental management practices, sector-specific environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence described in this document; these benchmarks in particular were deemed to be representative of the levels of environmental performance that are achieved by the best performing organisations in the sector. the srd aims to help and support all organisations that intend to improve their environmental performance by providing ideas and inspiration as well as practical and technical guidance. the srd is primarily addressed to organisations that are already registered with emas; secondly to organisations that are considering registering with emas in the future; and thirdly to all organisations that wish to learn more about best environmental management practices in order to improve their environmental performance. consequently, the objective of this document is to support all organisations in the public administration sector to focus on relevant environmental aspects, both direct and indirect, and to find information on best environmental management practices, as well as appropriate sector-specific environmental performance indicators to measure their environmental performance, and benchmarks of excellence. how srds should be taken into account by emas-registered organisations: pursuant to regulation (ec) no 1221/2009, emas-registered organisations are to take srds into account at two different levels: 1. when developing and implementing their environmental management system in light of the environmental reviews (article 4(1)(b)): organisations should use relevant elements of the srd when defining and reviewing their environmental targets and objectives in accordance with the relevant environmental aspects identified in the environmental review and policy, as well as when deciding on the actions to implement to improve their environmental performance. 2. when preparing the environmental statement (article 4(1)(d) and article 4(4)): (a) organisations should consider the relevant sector-specific environmental performance indicators in the srd when choosing the indicators (4) to use for their reporting of environmental performance. when choosing the set of indicators for reporting, they should take into account the indicators proposed in the corresponding srd and their relevance with regards to the significant environmental aspects identified by the organisation in its environmental review. indicators need only be taken into account where relevant to those environmental aspects that are judged as being most significant in the environmental review. (b) when reporting on environmental performance and on other factors regarding environmental performance, organisations should mention in the environmental statement how the relevant best environmental management practices and, if available, benchmarks of excellence have been taken into account. they should describe how relevant best environmental management practices and benchmarks of excellence (which provide an indication of the environmental performance level that is achieved by best performers) were used to identify measures and actions, and possibly to set priorities, to (further) improve their environmental performance. however, implementing best environmental management practices or meeting the identified benchmarks of excellence is not mandatory, because the voluntary character of emas leaves the assessment of the feasibility of the benchmarks and of the implementation of the best practices, in terms of costs and benefits, to the organisations themselves. this feasibility assessment is also necessary for public administrations, which are frequently requested to lead by example. similarly to environmental performance indicators, the relevance and applicability of the best environmental management practices and benchmarks of excellence should be assessed by the organisation according to the significant environmental aspects identified by the organisation in its environmental review, as well as technical and financial aspects. elements of srds (indicators, bemps or benchmarks of excellence) not considered relevant with regards to the significant environmental aspects identified by the organisation in its environmental review should not be reported or described in the environmental statement. emas participation is an ongoing process. every time an organisation plans to improve its environmental performance (and reviews its environmental performance) it shall consult the srd on specific topics to find inspiration about which issues to tackle next in a step-wise approach. emas environmental verifiers shall check if and how the srd was taken into account by the organisation when preparing its environmental statement (article 18(5)(d) of regulation (ec) no 1221/2009). when undertaking an audit, accredited environmental verifiers will need evidence from the organisation of how the relevant elements of the srd have been selected in light of the environmental review and taken into account. they shall not check compliance with the described benchmarks of excellence, but they shall verify evidence on how the srd was used as a guide to identify indicators and proper voluntary measures that the organisation can implement to improve its environmental performance. given the voluntary nature of emas and srd, no disproportionate burdens should be put on the organisations to provide such evidence. in particular, verifiers shall not require an individual justification for each of the best practices, sector-specific environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence which are mentioned in the srd and not considered relevant by the organisation in light of its environmental review. nevertheless, they could suggest relevant additional elements for the organisation to take into account in the future as further evidence of its commitment to continuous performance improvement. structure of the sectoral reference document this document consists of four chapters. chapter 1 introduces emas legal background and describes how to use this document, while chapter 2 defines the scope of this srd. chapter 3 briefly describes the different best environmental management practices (bemps) (5) together with information on their applicability. when specific environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence could be formulated for a particular bemp, these are also given. however, defining benchmarks of excellence was not possible for all bemps because in some areas either there was limited data available or the specific conditions (local climate, local economy, local society, responsibilities of the public administration, etc.) vary to such an extent that a benchmark of excellence would not be meaningful. some of the indicators and benchmarks are relevant for more than one bemp and are thus repeated whenever appropriate. finally, chapter 4 presents a comprehensive table with a selection of the most relevant environmental performance indicators, associated explanations and related benchmarks of excellence. 2. scope this srd addresses the environmental performance of the activities of the public administration sector. in this document, the public administration sector includes organisations belonging mainly to the following nace code division (according to the statistical classification of economic activities established by regulation (ec) no 1893/2006 of the european parliament and of the council (6)): nace code 84: public administration and defence; compulsory social security. organisations registered under this nace code are the target group of this document. in addition, the best environmental management practices identified in this srd can be of inspiration also for other organisations, such as public owned companies or private companies delivering services on behalf of public administrations. these may belong, among others, to the following nace code divisions: nace code 2: forestry, logging, nace code 36: water collection, treatment and supply, nace code 37: sewerage, nace code 38: waste collection, treatment and disposal activities; materials recovery, nace code 39: remediation activities and other waste management services, nace code 41.2: construction of residential and non-residential buildings, nace code 49.3.1: urban and suburban passenger land transport. this srd targets a number of aspects which are relevant for all types of public administrations, such as the environmental performance of offices, the energy efficiency of public buildings and green public procurement (i.e. sections 3.1, 3.2.5, 3.2.7, 3.2.8, 3.2.10 and 3.11). all public administrations at local, regional, national and international level are invited to consult these sections of the document. however, effective environmental management for a public administration needs also to address its core business, where the largest environmental benefits can be achieved. this document aims at easing this task for local authorities and municipalities (7) focusing on best practices that are relevant for their role and the services they provide directly or indirectly to their inhabitants (e.g. waste water treatment, local public transport). local authorities are specifically targeted because they make up the highest share of public administrations in the eu and it is at the local level that there is the highest potential for replicability and learning from best practices. the main environmental aspects, the associated environmental pressures and the corresponding relevant sections of the document are presented in the table below. the environmental aspects listed were selected as the most relevant in the sector. however, the environmental aspects to be managed by each specific public administration should be assessed on a case-by-case basis. no distinction is made in the table below between direct and indirect environmental aspects, because the operations that are carried out in-house and those that are outsourced vary from case to case. moreover, many environmental aspects can be considered both direct and indirect, since they refer directly to the activities of the public administration but also to all the activities of residents, companies and organisations in the territory administered or served by the public administration. the most relevant environmental aspects and pressures for public administrations and how these are addressed in this document environmental aspect related main environmental pressure relevant sections of the srd operate offices solid waste generation water consumption energy consumption, ghg emissions (co2) emissions to air (co, so2, nox, particulate matter, etc.) resource depletion section 3.1 steer energy use in the territory administered and manage own energy use energy consumption, ghg emissions (co2) section 3.2 manage mobility and/or public transport emissions to air (co, so2, nox, particulate matter, etc.) energy consumption, ghg emissions (co2) section 3.3 plan land use and manage green urban areas land use biodiversity loss sections 3.4 and 3.5 manage ambient air quality and noise emissions to air (co, so2, nox, particulate matter, etc.) noise generation sections 3.6 and 3.7 waste management solid waste generation section 3.8 supply of potable water water consumption section 3.9 manage waste water treatment emissions to water (bod, cod, micropollutants, etc.) energy consumption, ghg emissions (co2) section 3.10 procure goods and services solid waste generation water consumption energy consumption, ghg emissions (co2) emissions to air (co, so2, nox, particulate matter, etc.) resource depletion section 3.11 promote environmental behaviour of residents and businesses solid waste generation water consumption energy consumption, ghg emissions (co2) emissions to air (co, so2, nox, particulate matter, etc.) emissions to water (cod, bod, micropollutants, etc.) resource depletion section 3.12 the best environmental management practices (bemps) described in chapter 3 were identified as the most relevant techniques, actions and measures that public administrations can implement to improve their environmental performance for each of the environmental aspects listed in the table above. in their identification, the specific challenges and opportunities of public bodies, compared to private companies were taken into account. these include, among others: more rigid procurement procedures, strict funding rules, need of longer time periods to implement decisions, legacy infrastructure, limited budget, but also: the possibility to accept longer term paybacks, the possibility to give priority to choices that result in societal benefits rather than financial paybacks, stability of staff, the opportunities for economies of scale in case of cooperation among different public administration at local, regional or national level. when considering the implementation of any of the bemps presented in this document, local authorities need to consider their specific challenges and how to take advantage of the specific opportunities available (8). 3. best environmental management practices, environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence for the public administration sector 3.1. best environmental management practices for sustainable offices this section is targeted to all public administrations having office-based operations. 3.1.1. managing and minimising energy use it is bemp to implement energy management according to the principles of the plan, do, check, act cycle in offices owned or managed by the public administration by: collecting frequently or monitoring constantly energy use data; data can be collected at building level, per building area (e.g. lobby, offices, canteen/bar), per type of energy source (e.g. gas, electricity) and per end-use category (e.g. lighting, space heating), analysing the data, setting targets, identifying benchmarks and using them for comparing actual energy use performance, defining a strategy and action plan for the improvement of the energy performance of the office building (see sections 3.2.5, 3.2.7, 3.2.8). applicability this bemp is broadly applicable to office buildings owned or managed by public administrations. however, actions that may arise from implementing this bemp may be more limited in rented buildings. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i1) total annual energy use per unit of floor area (9), expressed as final energy (kwh/m2/year). if available, this can also be broken down into: space heating (kwh/m2/year) space cooling (kwh/m2/year) lighting (kwh/m2/year) other electricity uses (kwh/m2/year) (i2) total annual energy use per full time equivalent (fte) employee, expressed as final energy (kwh/fte/year). if available, this can also be broken down into: space heating (kwh/fte/year) space cooling (kwh/fte/year) lighting (kwh/fte/year) other electricity uses (kwh/fte/year) (i3) total annual primary energy use per floor area or full time equivalent (fte) employee (kwh/m2/year, kwh/fte/year) (i4) total annual greenhouse gas emissions per floor area or full time equivalent (fte) employee (kg co2eq/m2/year, kg co2eq/fte/year) 3.1.2. managing and minimising water use it is bemp to implement water management according to the principles of the plan, do, check, act cycle in offices owned or managed by the public administration by: collecting frequently or monitoring constantly water use data; data can be collected at building level, per relevant building area where water is used (e.g. lobby, offices, canteen/bar), and per end-use category (e.g. restrooms, kitchens), analysing the data, setting targets, identifying benchmarks and using them for comparison with actual water use, defining a strategy and action plan for the reduction of water use (e.g. installing water efficient taps, showers and pressure reducing valves, regularly maintaining them, installing rainwater harvesting systems). applicability this bemp is broadly applicable to office buildings owned or managed by public administrations, provided that costs for installation and maintenance of systems for monitoring and collecting water use data are paid back by the expected water savings achievable. in rented buildings, actions that may arise from implementing this bemp may be more limited. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i5) total annual water use per full time equivalent (fte) employee (m3/fte/year), split into (if relevant): mains water use (m3/fte/year) harvested rainwater use (m3/fte/year) recycled greywater use (m3/fte/year) (i6) total annual water use per internal floor space (m3/m2/year), split into (if relevant): mains water use (m3/m2/year) harvested rainwater use (m3/m2/year) recycled greywater use (m3/m2/year) (b1) total water use in office buildings is lower than 6,4 m3/full time equivalent employee/year 3.1.3. managing and minimising waste production it is bemp to implement advanced waste management in offices owned or managed by public administrations, based on: prevention: establish paperless procedures and archives, ensure durability of equipment and consumables (e.g. via green public procurement, see section 3.11), enable reuse of office furniture and equipment (e.g. setup of an online inventory of available equipment, furniture and stationery that are no longer needed and ensuring that all services and staff look there before purchasing new items; providing professional cleaning, repair and maintenance to extend lifetime); incentivize staff to use reusable cups instead of single use plastics; provide water fountains (without plastic cups) instead of plastic bottles in meetings or public spaces, segregation: easy access to recycling bins for all the most common waste types and establishment of recycling points for all other waste types, in order to minimise residual waste generation; purchase equipment and consumables made with recyclable materials, monitoring: regular accounting of quantities of waste generated by waste type, covering all types of waste (e.g. separately collected fractions, residual waste, hazardous waste); this can be achieved thanks to appropriate strategies and the involvement of staff from different services. applicability this bemp is applicable to all public administrations, and specific to office activity. the specific measure implemented (e.g. the different fractions into which waste is segregated) should reflect the specific conditions (e.g. types of waste generated, local availability of recycling services for particular waste types, local legislation and waste management costs). associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i7) total annual office waste generation per full time equivalent (fte) employee (kg/fte/year) (i8) total annual amount of furniture, equipment and stationery that is reused (kg/fte/year, eur of avoided purchase/fte/year) (i9) office waste sent for recycling as % of total waste by weight (%) (i10) residual office waste (10) as % of total waste by weight (%) (b2) zero waste generated in the office buildings is sent to landfill (b3) total waste generation in office buildings is lower than 200 kg/full time equivalent employee/year 3.1.4. minimising the consumption of office paper and consumables it is bemp to: implement and promote internal procedures (e.g. paperless procedures such as electronic workflows, e-signatures and electronic archives, no printing of documents for meetings, no printing of newsletters/reports, double-side printing as default option) that help employees and the public to avoid the use of office paper (i.e. copier/printer paper) and consumables (i.e. all material such as pens, pencils, highlighters, notebooks used in offices), thereby reducing demand, use green public procurement (see section 3.11) to drive lower impact choices, e.g. low-grammage office paper, longer lasting, refillable products and alternatives with a low environmental impact or low toxicity. applicability this bemp is broadly applicable to all public administrations. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i11) daily number of sheets (11) of office paper used per full time equivalent (fte) employee (sheets of paper/fte/working day) (i12) share of environmentally friendly certified office paper purchased in the total purchased office paper (%) (i13) annual cost of office consumables purchased per full time equivalent (fte) employee (eur/fte/year) (b4) office paper consumption is lower than 15 a4 sheets/full time equivalent employee/working day (b5) office paper used is 100 % recycled or certified according to an iso type i ecolabel (12) (e.g. eu ecolabel) 3.1.5. minimising the environmental impact of commuting and business travel it is bemp to minimise the environmental impact of commuting and business travel by: staff engagement and behavioural change towards more sustainable commuting (e.g. campaigns through digital tools, economic incentives/disincentives, use of social games or reward based incentives), drawing up of organisation-wide staff travel plans which encourage sustainable modes of commuting and business travel (e.g. agreement with local public transport providers to adapt routes to the needs of commuters; carbon budgeting for business travel), including stringent sustainability criteria in the procurement of transport services (e.g. use of train rather than flights for short journeys; preference for direct flights or multimodal journeys over connecting flights), reducing commuting by car where public transport exists and encouraging efficient car use (e.g. reducing single passenger car journeys by promoting car-pooling among employees), enabling agile working for employees, thus reducing transport needs overall (e.g. introducing remote and home working, installing virtual meeting facilities). applicability this bemp is applicable across all types and scales of public administrations. however, the specific measures to be implemented vary depending on local conditions, such as geographical setting and availability of public transport. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i14) implementation of tools for promoting sustainable commuting (y/n) (i15) percentage of staff commuting by car on a daily basis as single passenger (%) (i16) percentage of staff commuting by walking, cycling or public transport at least 3 times per week (%) (i17) annual total co2eq emissions from business travel (tonnes co2eq/year) (i18) annual total co2eq emissions from business travel per full time equivalent (fte) employee (kg co2eq/fte/year) (i19) implementation of carbon budgeting for all business travel (y/n) (i20) availability of videoconferencing facilities to all staff and monitoring and promotion of their use (y/n) (b6) tools for promoting sustainable commuting for employees are implemented and promoted (b7) carbon budgeting is implemented for all business travel (b8) videoconferencing facilities are available to all staff and their use is monitored and promoted 3.1.6. minimising the environmental impact of canteens and coffee bars it is bemp to: procure canteen or coffee bar services, or the food and beverages for canteens and coffee bars managed in-house, introducing sustainability requirements such as seasonal, organic food, ensuring availability of vegetarian/vegan options and avoiding (where possible) offering products in single use plastic packaging; choose service providers who can offer services without the use of single use plastic items such as cups, dishes and cutlery (see also section 3.11), conduct staff engagement campaigns promoting sustainable food choices, drive behaviour change in canteens and coffee bars by choice of architecture (i.e. changing how options are presented which can make a particular choice the natural or default preference) and pricing policy (i.e. lower price for more sustainable food options), implement a reduction of food waste policy by implementing reduced food portions, offer of different sized portions, careful forward planning of menus, etc. applicability this bemp is applicable across all types and scales of public administration offices that have internal canteen or coffee bar facilities. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i21) percentage of low-impact food options served (e.g. seasonal, organic) (% of low-impact food out of the total purchase volume) (i22) amount of food waste generated per meal served (g/meal) (i23) percentage of food waste sent for anaerobic digestion (% sent for anaerobic digestion out of the total tonnes of food waste) 3.1.7. minimising the environmental impact of the organisation of meetings and events it is bemp to: introduce a sustainable event management system; the management system may be implemented by the public administration itself, and/or contractors/suppliers should be sought who have a management system in place; suppliers and hotels can also have an environmental management system (e.g. emas), communicate to all stakeholders (from suppliers, to delegates and the wider community) and engage with those involved with and/or attending an event on measures they can undertake to reduce the environmental impact of attending the event (e.g. using correct segregated bins, choosing tap water and reusable water bottles, choose sustainable means of transport), select the venue of the event or meeting considering environmental criteria (e.g. well-connected by public transport, building with reduced environmental impact, venue with an environmental management system in place), choose products and services needed for the organisation of meetings and events implementing green public procurement (see section 3.11) and limit gadgets and the content of conference packs (e.g. leaflets, pen drives, badges), procure catering services, or the food and beverages from catering services managed in-house, introducing sustainability requirements such as seasonal, organic food, ensuring availability of vegetarian/vegan options and avoiding (where possible) offering products in single use plastic packaging; choose service providers who can offer services without the use of single use plastic dishes, cups and cutlery, and make water fountains available instead of water bottles (see also sections 3.1.6 and 3.11). applicability this bemp is applicable across all types and scales of public administrations organising meetings and events. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i24) share of suppliers with a recognised sustainable events management system (e.g. iso20121) or environmental management system (e.g. emas) (%) (i25) share of event-related tenders including in the criteria a reference to a recognised events management system (e.g. iso20121) or environmental management system (e.g. emas) (%) 3.2. best environmental management practices for sustainable energy and climate change this section is targeted to local authorities, both in their capacity as administration and service providers with a wide range of energy-using direct operations, and in their guiding role for the territory they are responsible for. the bemps in this section are divided into four groups: policy bemps, related to the policy measures that a local authority can put in place to drive sustainable energy, both in-house and in the territory administered, as well as climate change mitigation and adaptation, bemps regarding direct operations, on how local authorities can reduce energy use and switch to renewable energy in their own buildings and infrastructures, bemps regarding the regulatory and planning role of municipalities, bemps on the influence of municipalities on their territory, on the exemplary role that the public sector can play and how local authorities can trigger actions by residents and organisations. policy bemps 3.2.1. establishing an inventory of energy use and emissions of the territory of the municipality it is bemp to: systematically collect energy use and emission data from the territory of the municipality; the scope of the inventory includes energy consumption and emissions across the territory from all sectors, encompassing industry, commerce/services, agriculture, construction, housing and transport, publicly report the data collected and use them to identify actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the territory (see section 3.2.2). applicability this bemp is applicable to all local authorities. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i26) total annual carbon emissions of the territory of the municipality: absolute (t co2eq) and per inhabitant (kg co2eq/inhabitant) (i27) annual energy use of the territory of the municipality per inhabitant, expressed as final energy (kwh/inhabitant) 3.2.2. establishing and implementing a municipal energy and climate action plan it is bemp to establish a municipal energy and climate action plan based on the inventory of energy use and emissions (see section 3.2.1). the action plan includes science and evidence based short- and long-term targets which can be reached by implementing a number of defined actions (e.g. reduce the energy use of private buildings and businesses, reduce the energy use of municipal buildings and local public services, improve public transport). applicability this bemp is applicable to all local authorities. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i28) a municipal energy and climate action plan, including targets and actions, is in place (y/n) (i26) total annual carbon emissions of the territory of the municipality: absolute (t co2eq) and per inhabitant (kg co2eq/inhabitant) (i27) annual energy use of the territory of the municipality per inhabitant, expressed as final energy (kwh/inhabitant) (b9) a municipal energy and climate action plan, including targets and actions and based on the inventory of energy use and emissions, is in place 3.2.3. establishing and implementing a strategy for climate change adaptation within the territory of the municipality it is bemp to establish a holistic climate change adaptation strategy for the territory of the municipality that allows protecting the built and natural environment against the adverse effects and impacts of climate change (e.g. floods, heat waves, droughts). the climate change adaptation strategy can build on other local and regional adaptation strategies and should ensure that they are linked together. the strategy needs to be coherent with and taken into account by other relevant policies and strategies (e.g. watercourse management plans). applicability this bemp is applicable to all local authorities. the scope of the adaption strategy should be developed in relation to the specific context of the public administration. the measures contained in the strategy need to respond to the projected climate change impacts on the territory. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i29) a holistic climate change adaptation strategy for the territory of the municipality is in place (y/n) (i30) percentage of homes and businesses protected as a result of the strategy (%) (b10) a holistic climate change adaptation strategy for the territory of the municipality is in place bemps regarding direct operations 3.2.4. implementing energy-efficient street lighting it bemp to: carry out an audit of the street lighting system, improve the luminaires to avoid upward lighting and intrusive lighting and maximise useful lighting, reduce lighting levels to actual needs (i.e. avoid overlighting), replace lamps selecting highly energy-efficient technologies (e.g. led) taking into account durability, colour rendering index (13) and colour temperature of the light (14), implement night dimming (i.e. reduced lighting late at night), introduce intelligent street lighting (e.g. using sensors to temporarily increase the lighting levels when the presence of people is detected). applicability this bemp is applicable to all public administrations directly or indirectly (through a public or private company) managing the provision of street lighting. the investments required to implement the measures listed may, in some instances, be a limitation and affect the choice of specific measures to implement, but are generally outweighed by the energy savings and result in reasonable payback times. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i31) annual energy use for street lighting per inhabitant (kwh/inhabitant/year) (i32) annual energy use for street lighting per kilometre of street lit (mwh/km/year) (b11) street lighting energy use per kilometre is lower than 6 mwh/km/year 3.2.5. improving the energy efficiency of public buildings it is bemp to maximise the energy efficiency of public buildings and minimise their energy use. this can be achieved by improving the energy performance and integrity of the building envelope (walls, roof and glazing) and increasing the airtightness, as well as installing energy efficient equipment and commissioning the energy systems. both new and existing public buildings can achieve better energy performance than the minimum standards set in the national building codes (15) and be designed or renovated as nearly zero-energy buildings (nzeb) ahead of the eu obligation (16). when defining the measures to improve the energy efficiency of the buildings, not only the energy performance to be achieved, but also the overall environmental impacts over the whole life cycle of the buildings need to be considered (17). these can be minimised by, among others, selecting sustainable and low embodied primary energy construction materials, ensuring, at the design phase, easy adaptability to support future re-use of the building and easy renovation (e.g. flexible floor plans) as well as the possibility to deconstruct for re-use and recycling of building materials and elements. applicability this bemp is applicable to all public administrations provided that they can commit the required financial resources for improving the energy efficiency of public buildings. this bemp may be more difficult to implement in rented properties. additionally, the level of energy performance that can be achieved in each specific case will be affected by the characteristics of the building (e.g. old building). associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i1) total annual energy use per unit of floor area, expressed as final energy (kwh/m2/year) (i33) total annual primary energy use per unit of floor area (kwh/m2/year) (b12) for newbuilds, the building is designed with a total primary energy use (including all uses) lower than 60 kwh/m2/year (b13) for existing buildings undergoing renovation, the building is designed with a total primary energy use (including all uses) lower than 100 kwh/m2/year 3.2.6. improving the energy efficiency of social housing it is bemp to improve the energy efficiency of social housing, both for existing buildings undergoing renovation and new buildings, as described above for public buildings (see section 3.2.5). for social housing, it is bemp to involve local residents in the process of planning the renovation or designing the new building, in order to take into account their needs and engage them in the benefits of nearly zero energy buildings and how to use them. applicability this bemp is applicable to public administrations that manage social housing. the amount of investment needed may prove a relevant barrier to its implementation. however, the relevant social benefits (improved welfare, reduced fuel poverty) and financial benefits (energy savings if energy costs are centrally paid, or a higher proportion of tenants paying their rent if they are responsible for their own energy costs) outweigh the investments. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i1) total annual energy use per unit of floor area, expressed as final energy (kwh/m2/year) (i33) total annual primary energy use per unit of floor area (kwh/m2/year) (b12) for newbuilds, the building is designed with a total primary energy use (including all uses) lower than 60 kwh/m2/year (b13) for existing buildings undergoing renovation, the building is designed with a total primary energy use (including all uses) lower than 100 kwh/m2/year 3.2.7. achieving energy efficiency in public buildings through energy performance contracts it is bemp to implement energy performance contracts for public buildings. the public administration appoints an energy service company (esco) in order to identify appropriate energy efficiency improvements for public buildings, develop them, put them in place, provide a guarantee that a set level of energy savings will be achieved, take responsibility for the risk of the investment and, in many cases, arrange financing to pay for the projects. this allows public administrations to improve energy efficiency in public buildings without the need to fund the investment costs upfront. two types of energy performance contracts exist: shared-savings contracts, where the esco and the public administration share the cost savings at a predetermined percentage for a fixed number of years, guaranteed-savings contracts, where the esco guarantees a certain level of energy savings for the public administration, which receives a cheaper energy bill. however, the real savings are higher than the guaranteed ones and the esco earns the difference. applicability all public administrations can apply energy performance contracting for introducing improvements to energy efficiency in their buildings. this is specifically relevant for public administrations and/or projects where otherwise it would be difficult to make the necessary investment because of lack of financial capacity or energy efficiency technical and management capacity. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i34) percentage of the total energy use of the public administration covered by energy performance contracts (%) 3.2.8. improving the energy performance of existing public buildings through monitoring, energy management and fostering of behavioural change it is bemp to: train key staff with direct responsibility for building and energy management in energy efficiency; the training needs to include theoretical and practical sessions supported by proper manuals and guides, engage all staff in actions that influence energy use (e.g. switch off lights, set a correct room temperature), focusing specifically on well-respected and influential members of staff (e.g. behaviour change champions), plan and run behaviour change campaigns to drive energy efficiency across the public administration; firstly, the target audience of each campaign needs to be identified and then specific energy-efficient actions can be properly promoted among the targeted staff, adopt energy performance certificates and display energy certificates, which rate the energy performance of a building, in order to display them prominently in the building or to use them as an engagement tool in specific awareness-raising campaigns. applicability this bemp is applicable to all public administrations. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i1) total annual energy use per unit of floor area, expressed as final energy (kwh/m2/year) (i35) percentage of staff engaged and who continue to be engaged one year after the launch of an awareness campaign (%) (i36) hours of environment-specific training provided per full time equivalent (fte) employee and year (hours/fte/year) 3.2.9. implementing district heating and/or district cooling networks it is bemp to implement district heating networks and/or district cooling networks to provide public buildings and/or households with, respectively, space heating and hot water or space cooling. by generating them in central units, the heating and/or cooling provided to the network can be sourced from combined heat and power systems or tri-generation plants. when possible, further environmental benefits can be obtained by running these systems on renewable biomass or by employing geothermal energy or waste heat from industrial plants. applicability this bemp is applicable to all local authorities. it is specifically relevant for newly built areas and major renovations of public building complexes or other public infrastructures (e.g. swimming pools). there are some limitations for low-density populated areas and where heating and cooling demand fluctuates considerably. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i37) annual co2 emissions of the system providing heating or cooling, before and after the implementation of district heating/cooling as an absolute figure or per unit of floor area of the buildings heated or cooled (t co2eq, kg co2eq/m2) 3.2.10. implementing on-site renewables and mini-combined heat and power (chp) systems in public buildings and social housing it is bemp to provide public buildings and social housing with low-carbon technologies to meet the energy demand. these can include solar thermal systems for heat generation, on-site photovoltaic panels for electricity generation, or, in case of sufficient heat demand, small-scale combined heat and power (mini-chp) systems to jointly generate the heat and the electricity at a higher overall efficiency. mini-chp systems can run on gas, or have additional environmental benefits if run on biomass where a local source of sustainable biomass is available. applicability this bemp is applicable to all public administrations. however, the possibility to implement specific solutions may be limited by the local availability of renewable energy sources and the financial investment required. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i38) on-site renewable energy generation per unit of floor area (kwh/m2 year) (i39) share of total energy use met by on-site renewables (%) (i40) share of total energy use met by on-site generation of low-carbon energy (%) (i41) share of total electricity use met by on-site generation of renewable electricity (%) (i42) percentage of hot water demand met by on-site renewable heat generation (%) (b14) 100 % of the electricity used in a public building is met by on-site generation of renewable electricity (b15) 100 % of the hot water demand in a public building/social housing building is met by on-site renewable heat generation bemps regarding the regulatory and planning role of municipalities 3.2.11. setting higher energy efficiency standards and renewable energy requirements in land use planning for newbuilds and buildings undergoing major renovations through local building regulations, urban planning and building permits it is bemp to introduce in the local planning system the provision that newbuilds and renovations within the territory are carried out to exemplary energy standards (i.e. high energy efficiency and integration of renewable energy generation). local autonomy enables most municipalities to go beyond the energy standards and renewable energy requirements set by national legislation and implement positive changes at the local level. the requirements introduced in the local planning system can be regularly updated following the developments of the construction industry and new national targets. it is also bemp to consider energy performance and integration of renewables in urban planning and building permits to require and/or encourage organisations and residents to adopt sustainable energy solutions. applicability this bemp is applicable to all local authorities with a role in setting the local building code and/or in providing building permits. however, national legislation may pose limitations on what they can require. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i43) establishment of regulations setting higher energy efficiency standards and renewable energy requirements (y/n) (i44) level of energy performance required by the local building code (kwh/m2/year) (i45) systematic consideration of energy performance and integration of renewables in the processing of building permits (y/n) bemps on the influence of municipalities on their territory 3.2.12. exemplary role of the public sector it is bemp to: show ambition by exceeding existing national or international targets for the local authoritys own energy use and for the energy use of its territory, with a firm commitment from the highest levels of the municipality and the engagement of the other relevant stakeholders, lead by example: the municipality can implement exemplary measures and achieve exemplary energy performance levels, both to demonstrate that it is possible and to foster the local market for sustainable energy solutions; the municipality can also deliver flagship projects to showcase the public authoritys commitment to sustainability, communicate effectively to the general public: the public administration needs to be seen to be delivering the ambition in order to encourage other stakeholders to follow suit, support the creation of incentives schemes: create local schemes to finance residents in their actions to reduce their environmental impact, help overcome institutional barriers for the adoption of sustainable energy solutions. applicability this bemp is applicable to all local public administrations. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i46) delivery of flagship and demonstration projects (y/n) (i47) achievement of an ambitious level of energy performance across all buildings and activities of the public administration (y/n) 3.2.13. information and advice services on energy efficiency and renewable energy for citizens and businesses and set up of public-private partnerships it is bemp to: adopt strategic partnerships to involve the wider community in the development and delivery of carbon reduction schemes, establish information and advice services to help residents and businesses reduce their energy use, set up and join public-private energy-related projects: public administrations can partner with private organisations with specialised knowledge in energy efficiency and renewable energy projects, support low-carbon pilot projects: pilot projects can help bring to the market energy efficiency and renewable energy solutions with the potential to be replicated by organisations and citizens in their territory. applicability this bemp is applicable to all public administrations with a role in promoting energy efficiency and/or renewable energy for residents and businesses. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i48) the public administration delivers information and advice services on energy efficiency and renewable energy (y/n) (i49) the public administration supports low-carbon pilot projects, e.g. through public-private partnerships (y/n) 3.2.14. thermographic surveying of the built environment in the territory of the municipality it is bemp to use thermography to collect data at various scales and to provide visual information on heat radiation, in order to understand where energy efficiency solutions need to be deployed as a priority and to engage residents and local organisations on the energy efficiency of buildings. a thermographic survey of a large area can be carried out by aerial thermography. applicability this bemp is applicable to local authorities. the thermographic survey needs to be performed under specific conditions in terms of climate (i.e. temperature, wind), period of the year (i.e. winter) and time of the day (i.e. early morning). associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i50) percentage of the built area of the territory of the municipality covered by thermographic surveying (%) (i51) potential energy savings identified thanks to the analysis of the thermographic survey (kwh/year, eur/year) (b16) recent (< 5 years) high-resolution (< 50 cm) thermographic data is available for 100 % of the built area in the territory of the municipality 3.3. best environmental management practices for mobility this section is targeted to public administrations responsible for mobility and/or public transport in their territory. 3.3.1. enacting a sustainable urban mobility plan it is bemp to adopt a sustainable urban mobility plan (sump) in order to provide an integrated approach to all modes of transport while taking into account planning for the surrounding environment. the sump aims to improve safety and security, reduce air and noise pollution, lower emissions and energy consumption, improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of transportation and enhance the attractiveness and quality of the urban environment and urban design. the following sections (3.3.2 to 3.3.9) describe measures that can be included in a sump. applicability this bemp is applicable to all public administrations responsible for mobility and/or public transport. local and contextual factors may influence the specific measures that can be included in the sump and their applicability. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i52) modal share of journeys (% of journeys made by car, motorbike, public transport, cycling and walking) (i53) accessibility of public transport (share of inhabitants living within 300 metres of an urban public transport stop with a minimum frequency of 15-20 minutes) (%) 3.3.2. fostering cycling and walking through cycling infrastructure, bike-sharing schemes and promotion of walking it is bemp to: adopt policy measures and strategies to foster cycling and walking; cycling and walking need to be well recognised as separate modes of transport in policy and planning documents and strategic plans of the city, with specific measures for each of them, establish an efficient infrastructure; walking and cycling infrastructures are needed in order to make walking and cycling safe, fast and attractive, apply methodological tools in order to systematically collect data on walking and cycling; following the development of walking and cycling and evaluating the effect of the measures implemented can support further decision making and choices to promote sustainable transport, develop effective and targeted communication tools promoting walking and cycling among residents and commuters. applicability this bemp is applicable to all public administrations responsible for mobility. however, some local and contextual factors (e.g. topography) may limit the applicability of specific measures supporting and promoting walking and cycling. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i52) modal share of journeys (% of journeys made by car, motorbike, public transport, cycling and walking) (i54) length of cycling infrastructure (cycle lanes, cycle tracks), in total (km) and in relation to the length of the total road network for vehicles (km of cycle lanes/km of roads) (i55) the city has a dedicated policy or plan for investment in walking/cycling infrastructure and measurable goals to increase walking/cycling that are politically adopted (y/n) (b17) the city has a modal split for cycling of 20 % or higher or the city has increased its modal split for cycling by at least 50 % during the last five years. (b18) at least 10 % of the citys investment in transport infrastructure and maintenance is dedicated to cycling infrastructure. 3.3.3. implementing a large-scale car-sharing scheme it is bemp to support and encourage the creation of a large car-sharing scheme in the territory of the municipality. car-sharing services are not generally run by the city in which they operate; however, the municipality can set up supportive infrastructure, establish appropriate policy and legislation to integrate car sharing into the city fabric and with public transport. the public administration can also become a business customer of the local car-sharing service, create public awareness, promote the service and establish standards that car-sharing operators must meet in order to be able take advantage of the citys supportive infrastructure (e.g. preferential lanes, low-traffic zones). cities may also decide to subsidise a car-sharing operator to expand or accelerate the rate of growth. applicability this bemp is particularly relevant for local authorities with an urban territory with more than 200 000 inhabitants. local authorities of territories with a lower population may encounter limitations in the applicability of the bemp due to the limited number of customers of the car-sharing scheme, higher costs, less-developed public transport network, etc. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i56) number of car-sharing users per 10 000 inhabitants (number/10 000 inhabitants) (i57) number of registered users per car-share vehicle (number of users/number of vehicles) (i58) number of inhabitants per shared car available (number of inhabitants/number of vehicles) (i59) mileage driven annually by car-sharing users (km/user/year) (i60) number of privately owned cars replaced by each vehicle in a car-sharing operators fleet (number of privately owned cars replaced/number of car-shared vehicles) (b19) at least 8 privately owned cars were replaced by each vehicle in the car-sharing operators fleet (b20) at least 1 shared car available per 2 500 inhabitants 3.3.4. integrated ticketing for public transport it is bemp to introduce integrated ticketing in the form of a smart system with the capability of identifying and charging for trips which use multiple modes of transport. if the public administration acts as a public transport operator (e.g. through a city-owned subsidiary company) it can implement the integrated ticketing itself. in cases where the municipality awards public transport services to private companies, the integrated ticketing solutions can be required in the tender. applicability this bemp is applicable to all public administrations responsible for public transport. however, below a certain critical mass of users and annual transactions, it can be challenging to recoup the initial investments in terms of the time and finances needed to implement a smart integrated ticketing system. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i61) percentage of trips paid for by the integrated ticket (%) (i62) number of public transport users who would have used private motorised transportation in the absence of an integrated ticketing system (normalised by total population in the catchment area) (b21) at least 75 % of trips are paid for by the integrated ticket 3.3.5. improving the uptake of electric vehicles in urban areas it is bemp to purchase electric vehicles (i.e. electric cars, mopeds and bikes) for the public administrations own fleet. additionally, schemes that support the purchase of electric vehicles by residents can also be put in place, devoting some budget or reaching agreements with local banks for reduced interest rates. moreover, public administration can support the uptake of electric vehicles by allowing their circulation in restricted traffic areas or in preferential lanes, creating or increasing the number of public charging points, reducing electric vehicles taxation, introducing or supporting electric vehicle car-sharing schemes and advertising to residents the support measures for electric vehicles. applicability this bemp is applicable to all local authorities and particularly relevant in cities (with a large share of short driving distances) and areas with problems of traffic congestion and air pollution. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i63) percentage of electric vehicles (per type, e.g. e-cars, e-bikes) on the road compared to total vehicles (%) (i64) percentage of electric public vehicles (per type, e.g. e-cars, e-bikes) within the total public vehicle fleet (%) (i65) number of public charging points per inhabitants (number/inhabitants) 3.3.6. fostering passenger intermodality it is bemp to encourage the development of convenient, safe, fast and seamless connections among sustainable modes of transport. intermodal transport systems link together the infrastructure and services for public transport (buses, trams/light rail and commuter rail), walking, biking, bike sharing, and car sharing. public administrations can foster passenger intermodality by cooperating with various public transport operators and bike- and car-sharing companies. applicability this bemp is applicable to all local authorities but particularly relevant for cities with complex transport networks and an extended territory. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i52) modal share of journeys (% of journeys made by car, motorbike, public transport, cycling and walking) (i66) average number of bicycle park spaces at public transport stops per average daily passenger throughput (number of bicycle park spaces/number of passengers) (i67) percentage of public transport users who combine it with walking/cycling out of the public transport users who live within a reasonable radius (800 m for walking and 3 km for cycling) of high-frequency (at least twice per hour during morning and evening rush hours) public transport stops (%) (i68) intermodal journey-planning software available to the inhabitants includes walkable and cycleable journey legs (y/n) (b22) the share of sustainable modes of transport used in the city (e.g. walking, cycling, bus, tram, train) is 60 % or higher 3.3.7. implementing a congestion charge it is bemp to implement a congestion charge in city areas with high traffic congestion. the congestion charge is an economic disincentive (fee) to the use of congested roads at the busiest times of the day. in order to be successful, the congestion charge needs to be implemented as part of a package of transport measures (see previous bemps in section 3.3) that provide a valid alternative to the use of a car. applicability this bemp is applicable to local authorities in urban areas with high traffic congestion and air pollution. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i52) modal share of journeys (% of journeys made by car, motorbike, public transport, cycling and walking) (i69) percentage of reduction in air pollutants (particulate matters pm10, ammonia and nitrogen oxide) within the congestion charge area, compared to the situation before the introduction of the congestion charge (%) (i70) percentage of reduction in vehicular access of non-exempt vehicles to the congestion charge area compared to the situation before the introduction of the congestion charge (%) (i71) percentage of increased average speed and punctuality of public transport vehicles in the congestion charge area compared to the situation before the introduction of the congestion charge (%) (b23) the concentration of air pollutants (pm10, ammonia and nitrogen oxide) is reduced by 10 % (on average) within the congestion charge area, compared to the situation before the introduction of the congestion charge (b24) vehicular access of non-exempt vehicles to the congestion charge area is reduced by 20 % compared to the situation before the introduction of the congestion charge (b25) the speed and punctuality of public transport services are improved by 5 % compared to the situation before the introduction of the congestion charge 3.3.8. limiting free parking spaces in cities it is bemp to limit on-street free parking spaces (i.e. free of charge) in urban areas and remove minimum parking requirements (for on-street parking and underground garages) in new building developments. additionally, a formal policy to incrementally remove any previous parking requirements (for on-street parking and underground garages) from existing developments can also be adopted. limiting on-street free parking spaces is a disincentive to privately owned cars. these measures are most effective when accompanied by measures to improve the availability and reliability of valid alternatives to the use of a car, such as public transport, cycling and walking. applicability this bemp is applicable to all local authorities and specifically relevant for cities with high traffic congestion and air pollution or underused public transport. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i52) modal share of journeys (% of journeys made by car, motorbike, public transport, cycling and walking) (i72) percentage of available parking spaces during business hours (%) (i73) existence of minimum parking requirements (for on-street parking and underground garages) for new developments (y/n) (b26) on-street parking spaces are between 80 % and 90 % occupied during 90 % of business hours (b27) the city has no minimum parking requirements (for on-street parking and underground garages) for new developments and has a formal policy to incrementally remove any previous parking requirements from existing developments 3.3.9. implementation of logistics service centres it is bemp to involve the relevant stakeholders and support the implementation of a logistics service centre in the territory of the municipality. the logistics service centre can be situated in relatively close proximity to the geographical area that it serves, to allow consolidated deliveries to be carried out within that area. applicability this bemp is applicable to all local authorities responsible for mobility and specifically relevant for cities which receive a high volume of deliveries of goods and/or are subject to high traffic congestion and air pollution. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i74) emissions of co2 from delivery vehicles over a specific timespan (e.g. yearly, monthly) in the area served by the logistics service centre (kg co2eq/year or kg co2eq/month) (i75) number of delivery trips per day in the service area (number/day) (b28) 40 % reduction in co2 emissions from delivery vehicles in the service area compared to the situation before the implementation of the logistics service centre (b29) 75 % reduction in the number of delivery trips per day to the service area compared to the situation before the implementation of the logistics service centre 3.4. best environmental management practices for land use this section is targeted to local authorities responsible for land use planning. 3.4.1. limiting urban sprawl into green spaces and agricultural land it is bemp to limit and control urban sprawl by regulatory measures (e.g. spatial land use planning, restriction on specific land use), economic intervention (e.g. trading in building permits) and institutional change and management (e.g. special agencies for urban revitalisation). examples of measures to limit urban sprawl are encouraging building on brownfield land, minimising sealed space between buildings, renovating unused buildings, and promoting vertical development. applicability this bemp is applicable to all local authorities responsible for land use planning. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i76) percentage of manmade impermeable surfaces (i.e. any kind of impermeable built area: buildings, roads, any part with no vegetation or water) in the territory of the municipality (km2 manmade impermeable surface/km2 total surface) (i77) percentage of new built area in a specific time span (e.g. 1, 5, 10 years) out of the total built area in the territory of the municipality at the beginning of the period considered (%) 3.4.2. reducing the urban heat island effect it is bemp to mitigate the urban heat island effect through the implementation of a combination of measures, such as green areas, green roofs, the use of reflective materials, increasing the efficiency of the insulation of hot pipes and avoiding the dissipation of waste heat by its reuse. applicability this bemp is applicable to all local authorities responsible for land use planning in large urban areas. small municipalities are less affected by the urban heat island effect. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i78) implementation of measures to mitigate the urban heat island effect, such as green areas, green roofs or use of reflective materials (y/n) 3.4.3. requiring low-impact water drainage in sealed soils it is bemp to require low-impact drainage measures in the construction of new developments (including major redevelopments of existing built areas) to prevent and control flooding, soil erosion and pollution, and groundwater pollution. low-impact drainage measures adopting the sustainable drainage systems (suds) philosophy are considered best practice, as suds follow outstanding principles which: seek the improvement of water run-off quality, reduce surface run-off, contribute to biodiversity and create amenity value, try to replicate, as closely as possible, the natural drainage before development, have an integrated management hierarchy of prevention, source control and site control. applicability this bemp is applicable to all local authorities responsible for land use planning. the specific measures to improve water drainage are site-specific. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i79) existence of requirements for low-impact drainage measures for the construction of new developments and for major redevelopments (y/n) 3.5. best environmental management practices for green urban areas this section is targeted to public administrations responsible for the management of green urban areas. 3.5.1. establishing and implementing a local biodiversity strategy and action plan it is bemp to introduce a local biodiversity strategy and action plan whose goals and objectives can be defined thanks to dialogue with experts, stakeholders and residents. the action plan needs to include the measures to be implemented, timelines, budget available, milestones, partnerships for implementation and responsibilities. the results of the action plan can be promoted and disseminated to inhabitants and stakeholders to raise awareness. applicability this bemp is applicable to all public administrations responsible for the management of green urban areas. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i80) percentage and number of native species (for different categories of species, e.g. birds, butterflies) in the urban area (%) (i81) percentage of natural and semi-natural areas in the urban area out of the total urban area (%) (i82) green space per inhabitant (m2/inhabitant) distinguishing between urban, semi-urban and rural areas 3.5.2. creating blue-green networks it is bemp to develop blue-green networks (18), recreating a nature-oriented water cycle and contributing to the amenity of the city, by bringing water management and green infrastructure together. blue-green networks can combine and protect the hydrological and ecological values of the urban landscape while providing resilient and adaptive measures to deal with flooding events. applicability this bemp is applicable to all local authorities. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i83) percentage of green and blue urban areas in the urban area out of the total urban area (%) 3.5.3. fostering the deployment of green roofs it is bemp to develop appropriate policy schemes that support the construction of green roofs in new and existing buildings, both public and private. green roofs can also host renewable energy systems, such as photovoltaic panels (see section 3.2.10 for more information on renewable energy generation in public buildings and social housing). policy schemes that support the deployment of green roofs can incorporate economic incentives, reduced bureaucracy, and specific technical support for inclusion of green roofs in the construction or renovation of buildings. applicability this bemp is applicable to all local authorities responsible for land use planning. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i84) percentage of surface covered with green roofs out of the total surface of the urban area (m2 green roof/m2 urban area) (i85) percentage or number of buildings with green roofs in a given urban area (%) 3.5.4. giving new environmental value to derelict green areas and fringe areas it is bemp to adopt a plan to restore derelict green areas and fringe areas in the territory of the municipality in order to remove pollutants from soil and water, improve the habitat for wildlife, reduce the urban heat island effect and protect against soil erosion and floods, while offering recreational green areas for the local residents. applicability this bemp is applicable to all local authorities responsible for land use planning. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i86) adoption of a plan for the restoration and environmental management of the derelict green areas and fringe areas within the urban area (y/n) 3.6. best environmental management practices for local ambient air quality this section is targeted to public administrations responsible for the management of air quality. 3.6.1. improving local ambient air quality it is bemp to have a structured plan to improve air quality with regularly updated goals, both short-term and long-term, set in advance and going beyond the target and limit values set in directive 2008/50/ec of the european parliament and of the council (19) (the air quality directive). the plan needs to encompass all aspects starting with transport (car use, speed limits, public transport, etc.), industrial installations, energy production, type of heating systems in buildings, energy efficiency of buildings and land use planning and needs to be developed in cooperation with the relevant sectoral authorities and stakeholders. moreover, where applicable, the effectiveness of the plan can be enhanced by developing it in coordination with higher level public authorities and neighbouring municipalities. the plan to improve air quality can also include dissemination of information to residents about the effects and importance of air quality, by, for instance, promoting the use of sustainable transport options. applicability this bemp is applicable to all public administrations responsible for the management of air quality in their territory, targeting specific local issues. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i87) annual average pm10 concentration ( g/m3) (i88) annual number of days when the daily average pm10 concentration exceeds the value of 50 g/m3 (days/year) (i89) annual average pm2,5 concentrations ( g/m3) (i90) annual number of days when the daily average pm2,5 concentration exceeds the value of 25 g/m3 (days/year) (i91) annual number of days when ozone (o3) concentration exceeds the value of 120 g/m3 of maximum daily 8-hour mean (days/year) (i92) annual average nitrogen dioxide (no2) concentration ( g/m3) (i93) annual number of days when the hourly no2 concentration exceeds the value of 200 g/m3 (days/year) (b30) for all the indicators defined in this bemp, the results achieve the levels set in the air quality guidelines produced by the world health organisation 3.7. best environmental management practices for noise pollution this section is targeted to public administrations responsible for tackling noise pollution. 3.7.1. monitoring, mapping and reducing noise pollution it is bemp to map noise in the territory of the municipality and to inform the public about the effects of noise pollution and the results of the mapping through an effective communication campaign. based on the results of the noise mapping, the local authorities need to create noise action plans to reduce local noise levels and maintain environmental noise quality in areas where it is good. applicability this bemp is applicable to all public administrations responsible for tackling noise pollution. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i94) percentage of noise level measurements exceeding local limit values out of the total number of measurements (%) (i95) residents exposed to noise levels exceeding local limit values out of the total population (%) (i96) residents exposed to night-time noise levels affecting health according to world health organisation limits out of the total population (%) 3.8. best environmental management practices for waste management this section is targeted to public administrations in charge of waste management. 3.8.1. taking into account the emas sectoral reference document for the waste management sector it is bemp to consider the best environmental management practices identified and presented in the emas sectoral reference document for the waste management sector (20) and to report on the indicators provided in that document. applicability this bemp is applicable to all public administrations in charge of waste management. 3.9. best environmental management practices for water supply this section is targeted to public administrations responsible for supplying potable water in their territory. 3.9.1. deploying full water metering at the household/final user level it is bemp to install water meters for each residential unit and any other individual final user (industrial plant, commercial building, public building, etc.) in order to base all water bills on actual water consumption. by adopting smart water meters, in particular, it is possible to monitor water use remotely and in a timely manner and, for instance, to analyse the consumption patterns of different customers or identify weaknesses of the water distribution networks. billing actual water consumption and enabling early identification of abnormal water usage (e.g. leakages) can result in significant water savings. applicability the technique is applicable to any existing water supply network. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i97) penetration rate of water metering (% of consumers, % of water consumption covered by metering) (i98) percentage of smart meters out of the total water meters in use (%) (i99) reduction in water use by final users after installation of water meters and/or smart meters (l/user) (b31) the penetration rate of water meters at household or final user level is 99 % or higher (b32) in water-scarce areas (21) (at least for part of the year), water meters at household/final user level are smart meters (b33) all new buildings are equipped with water meters (smart meters in water-scarce areas) 3.9.2. minimising water leakages from the water distribution system it is bemp to: carry out a detailed water balance of the water distribution system and manage water pressure, avoiding high levels, analyse the water distribution network and divide it into adequate district metering areas to detect water leakages by means of manual or automatic acoustic water leakage detectors, respond promptly and adequately to the identified faults and leakages of the network, establish a database to list and geo-reference all technical installations, the age of pipes, types of pipes, hydraulic data, previous interventions, etc. applicability this bemp is applicable to new and existing water distribution networks. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i100) percentage of water loss out of the system input volume (%) (i101) infrastructure leakage index (ili): calculated as current annual real losses (carl)/unavoidable annual real losses (uarl) (22) (b34) the infrastructure leakage index is lower than 1,5 3.10. best environmental management practices for waste water management this section is targeted to public administrations responsible for waste water management and urban drainage. 3.10.1. energy-efficient waste water treatment achieving full nitrifying conditions it is bemp to: have the installed capacity to treat at least twice the dry weather waste water flow (in case of rain or thawing), treat the waste water at nitrifying conditions (food to microorganisms ratio of < 0,15 kg bod5/kg mlss (23) per day), and perform denitrification and phosphorus removal, remove suspended solids by means of sand filtration (or by submerged membranes) in the case of sensitive receiving water bodies, implement other tertiary treatment to reduce micropollutants (see section 3.10.2), continuous monitoring of organic compounds (total organic carbon), ammonia, nitrate and phosphorus in the case of plant capacities of more than 100 000 population equivalents (p.e.) (24) or of a daily inflow bod5 load of more than 6 000 kg, stabilise primary and excess sludge in anaerobic digesters (see section 3.10.3), dry the anaerobically stabilised sludge and send it to incineration (see section 3.10.4), adopt energy-efficient technologies, such as energy-efficient fine bubble aeration systems in the biological stage and energy-efficient pumps and screw lifters. applicability this technique is applicable to public administrations responsible for waste water management, both in new and existing waste water treatment plants. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i102) concentrations in the discharged final effluent or removal efficiencies of cod, bod5, ammonia, total nitrogen and total phosphorus (mg/l, %) (i103) electricity use of the waste water treatment plant per mass of bod5 removed (kwh/kg of bod5 removed) (i104) electricity use of the waste water treatment plant per volume treated (kwh/m3 of waste water treated) (i105) annual electricity use of the waste water treatment plant per population equivalents (kwh/population equivalents/year) (b35) the removal efficiencies achieved are: at least 98 % for bod5, at least 90 % for cod, at least 90 % for ammonia, at least 80 % for total organic nitrogen compounds, and at least 90 % for total phosphorus (b36) the electricity use of the waste water treatment plant is: lower than 18 kwh/population equivalents/year for large municipal waste water treatment plants (with a size of more than 10 000 population equivalents) lower than 25 kwh/population equivalents/year for small municipal waste water treatment plants (with a size of less than 10 000 population equivalents) 3.10.2. minimising waste water emissions with special consideration of micropollutants it is bemp to significantly remove micropollutants by implementing tertiary treatment, such as adsorption onto pulverised activated carbon (pac) or oxidation with chlorine-free oxidising agents (specifically ozone). applicability this bemp is applicable to public administrations responsible for waste water management, both in new and existing municipal waste water treatment plants; however, for existing plants, there could be space constraints which can be overcome by adapted design of the equipment. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i106) removal efficiency for micropollutants in the adsorption or ozonation stage in terms of cod or doc (25) (%) (i107) percentage of the annual waste water flow undergoing tertiary treatment for micropollutants removal (%) (b37) the average removal efficiency for micropollutants is higher than 80 % (b38) micropollutants are removed from at least 90 % of the annual waste water flow 3.10.3. anaerobic digestion of sludge and optimal energy recovery it is bemp to stabilise primary and excess sludge in anaerobic digesters and to employ the produced biogas, using efficient pumps and screw lifters, for on-site efficient electricity generation and for sludge drying. applicability this bemp is applicable to public administrations responsible for waste water management, in large new and existing waste water treatment plants, with a capacity of more than 100 000 population equivalents or of a daily inflow bod5 load of more than 6 000 kg. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i108) percentage of electricity and heat needs of the waste water treatment plant met by own-generated electricity and heat from biogas on an annual basis (%) (i109) electrical efficiency of the generator fuelled with biogas (%) (i110) specific biogas production (n (26)/kg organic dry matter input) (b39) own-generated electricity and heat from biogas cover 100 % of the energy use for municipal waste water treatment plants with a size of more than 100 000 population equivalents without on-site thermal sludge drying, and 50 % in the case of plants with on-site thermal sludge drying 3.10.4. drying and incineration of sludge it is bemp to efficiently mechanically dewater the anaerobically stabilised sludge, e.g. by means of chamber filter presses, and then completely oxidise it in a mono-incineration plant (as detailed in the best available techniques reference documents (27) according to the industrial emissions directive (28)). the phosphorus contained in the ash of the incineration residue can be recovered. applicability the technique is applicable to public administrations responsible for waste water management, both in new and existing waste water treatment plants. in the case of small plants, the mechanically dewatered sludge can be sent to a separate central mono-incineration sludge plant instead of being incinerated on site. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i111) percentage of the sewage sludge produced in the waste water treatment plant that is mono-incinerated (%) (i112) percentage of phosphorus present in the incineration ashes of the waste water treatment plant that is recovered (%) 3.10.5. promoting the use of reclaimed water from waste water treatment effluents it is bemp to promote the use of reclaimed water from waste water treatment effluents. this can be used for, e.g.: irrigation, including non-agricultural irrigation, e.g. parks, non-potable urban uses, such as street cleaning, snowmaking for adjacent ski resorts, toilet flushing in public buildings, public fountains, industrial uses, e.g. cooling, groundwater recharging. local public administrations can ensure the possibility to use the reclaimed water in some specific applications by fitting waste water treatment plants with the appropriate tertiary and disinfection treatment systems as needed. in the process, local public administrations need to engage with relevant stakeholders (e.g. local farmers, agricultural cooperatives) that may be interested in making use of the reclaimed water. applicability this bemp is applicable to all public administrations in charge of waste water treatment. however, water reuse is particularly relevant in water-scarce areas, where it can reduce the impact on water resources and where the extra investments and operational costs are economically feasible. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i113) amount of reclaimed water produced from waste water treatment in a given time period (m3/year, m3/hour) (i114) percentage of reclaimed water out of the total waste water treated (%) 3.10.6. retention and treatment of overflows from combined sewer systems and of storm water from separate sewer systems in the case of combined sewers (29), it is bemp to treat the overflow of the retention tanks, by means of fine screens (4-6 mm) and sediment tanks, and, depending on the water quality of the received water, by soil retention filters or other techniques with a similar suspended solids, cod, heavy metals and organic pollutants removal efficiency. in the case of separate sewers, it is bemp to treat the storm water depending on its level of pollution, and directly discharge only storm water with no or low pollution. applicability this bemp is applicable to all local authorities responsible for waste water management and urban drainage. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i115) for combined sewer systems, ratio of pollutants (total suspended solids, cod and heavy metals) discharged to water bodies from waste water treatment out of the total emissions (from treated waste water plus storm water overflows) (%) (i116) for separate sewer systems, percentage of contaminated impervious areas from which storm water is adequately treated (%) 3.10.7. sustainable urban drainage system it is bemp to reduce the flow of storm water reaching combined and separate sewers by improving water infiltration into soil (e.g. reducing soil sealing). this allows the limiting of overflows to situations of very heavy rainfall and ensuring that all discharges of urban run-off are well managed in order to avoid relevant emissions of pollutants to the receiving water body. local authorities can promote sustainable urban drainage by including appropriate provisions, based on a holistic approach at the river basin level, in the local policies for land use (see also section 3.4.3). applicability this bemp is applicable to all local authorities responsible for urban drainage and land use planning. the sustainable urban drainage measures can be implemented in new and existing developments. however, in existing built areas there may be some constraints (e.g. lack of space available for local infiltration). associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i76) percentage of artificial surfaces (i.e. any kind of impermeable built area: buildings, roads, any part with no vegetation or water) in the territory of the municipality (km2 of artificial surface/km2 of total surface) (i117) annual percentage of estimated rainwater which is retained and infiltrated into the ground locally out of the total estimated rainwater falling on the urban area of the municipality (%) 3.11. best environmental management practices for green public procurement this section is targeted to all public administrations. 3.11.1. systematically including environmental criteria in all public procurement it is bemp to introduce environmental criteria for the procurement of products (goods, services and works) and to consider most economical, in the tender criteria, the life-cycle cost of a product or service and not only the initial investment for its purchase. environmental criteria can be introduced in the technical specifications, selection criteria, award criteria and contract performance clauses of any tender where a relevant potential environmental impact is expected. public administrations needing guidance on the formulation of the environmental criteria can: introduce the eu green public procurement (30) (eu gpp) comprehensive criteria, when available for the specific product, in the technical specifications, selection criteria, award criteria and contract performance clauses, where no eu gpp recommendations exist, refer to the eu ecolabel, when available for the specific product by using the eu ecolabel criteria in public procurement (31), introduce as an award criterion in public tenders for the procurement of goods, services and works the emas registration of the suppliers, providing additional points in the evaluation process of the bids provided that the implementation of an environmental management system is relevant with regards to the substance matter of the contract. in sectors or areas where there is a low number of emas registered organisations among the market players and this could restrict the number of bids, reference can be extended to environmental management systems based on international standard (i.e. iso 14001). however public administrations can reward the higher credibility and reliability of emas by providing more point to emas registered organisations than to organisations with other environmental management systems that do not present the same guarantees. applicability this bemp is applicable to all public administrations. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i118) percentage of tenders including environmental criteria out of the total number of tenders, disaggregated by product category (%) (b40) 100 % of tenders include environmental criteria that require at least the level of performance set in the eu gpp criteria, for products where eu gpp criteria are available (e.g. office paper, cleaning agents, furniture) 3.12. best environmental management practices for environmental education and dissemination of information this section is targeted to public administrations responsible for the environmental education of citizens and provision of environmental information to businesses. 3.12.1. environmental education and information for citizens and businesses it is bemp to provide environmental education and information to citizens and businesses with the objective of: fostering public awareness of environmental problems, providing practical information on the everyday contribution that citizens and businesses can make to environmental protection and efficient utilisation of resources, creating new patterns of behaviour among different groups within society, inspiring citizens to get to know and appreciate the local environment and reconnect with nature, stimulating an understanding of the environmental interdependence between urban and surrounding rural and natural areas. such objectives can be achieved by organising educational seminars, conferences, workshops for the general public or specific groups of citizens, businesses or professionals on specific subjects (e.g. energy-efficient buildings). moreover, the local public administration can provide specific information on legal (and other) environment-related aspects and on incentives available (e.g. incentives for energy efficiency). all the activities can be organised with the involvement and cooperation of residents, local organisations and businesses that support the environmental education and information of citizens. applicability this bemp is applicable to all public administrations with a role in informing the public on environmental matters. associated environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence environmental performance indicators benchmarks of excellence (i119) percentage of citizens reached directly and indirectly by the environmental education actions (i120) presence of a municipal service or agency for provision of environment-related information to businesses (y/n) 4. recommended sector-specific key environmental performance indicators the following table lists a selection of key environmental performance indicators for the public administration sector. these are a subset of all the indicators mentioned in chapter 3. the table is divided according to the structure of this document. indicator common unit main target group short description recommended minimum level of monitoring related core indicator in accordance with annex iv to regulation (ec) no 1221/2009 (section c.2) benchmark of excellence related best environmental management practice bemps for sustainable offices 1. total annual energy use kwh/m2/year kwh/fte/year public administrations owning or managing offices total annual energy use divided by the total internal floor area or the number of full time equivalent (fte) employees. the indicator can also be broken down into: space heating, space cooling, lighting, other electricity uses. building level energy efficiency bemp 3.1.1 2. total annual greenhouse gas emissions kg co2eq/m2/year kg co2eq/fte/year public administrations owning or managing offices total annual greenhouse gas emissions generated from the use of office buildings divided by the total internal floor area or the number of full time equivalent (fte) employees building level energy efficiency bemp 3.1.1 3. total annual water use m3/fte/year m3/m2/year public administrations owning or managing offices total annual water consumption in office buildings, divided by the total internal floor area or the number of full time equivalent (fte) employees, broken down into (if relevant): mains water use, harvested rainwater use, recycled greywater use. building level water water use in office buildings is lower than 6,4 m3/full time equivalent employee/year bemp 3.1.2 4. total annual office waste generation kg/fte/year public administrations owning or managing offices total annual office waste generation in office buildings divided by the number of full time equivalent (fte) employees building level waste total waste generation in office buildings is lower than 200 kg/full time equivalent employee/year bemp 3.1.3 5. total annual office waste recycled % public administrations owning or managing offices percentage by weight of the total waste generated in offices which is separately collected for recycling building level waste zero waste generated in the office buildings is sent to landfill bemp 3.1.3 6. daily quantity of office paper used per full time equivalent employee sheets of paper/fte/working day public administrations owning or managing offices total number of sheets of office paper used annually divided by the number of full time equivalent (fte) employees and the number of working days organisation level material efficiency office paper consumption is lower than 15 a4 sheets/full time equivalent employee/working day bemp 3.1.4 7. share of environmentally friendly certified office paper purchased % public administrations owning or managing offices percentage of environmentally friendly certified office paper purchased (number of reams) out of the total purchased office paper (number of reams) organisation level energy efficiency material efficiency water waste biodiversity emissions office paper used is 100 % recycled or certified according to an iso type i ecolabel (e.g. eu ecolabel). bemp 3.1.4 8. adoption of tools for promoting sustainable commuting for employees y/n public administrations owning or managing offices staff are engaged about sustainable commuting thanks to the implementation and promotion of tools driving behaviour change organisation level emissions tools for promoting sustainable commuting for employees are implemented and promoted bemp 3.1.5 9. implementation of carbon budgeting for business travel y/n public administrations owning or managing offices a total carbon budget for business trips is allocated over a defined period. for each trip, the corresponding carbon emission equivalent is subtracted from the remaining carbon budget. organisation level emissions carbon budgeting is implemented for all business travel bemp 3.1.5 10. availability and monitoring of video-conferencing facilities y/n public administrations owning or managing offices videoconferencing facilities are promoted within the organisation and the number of hours of use is monitored. all staff can use the videoconferencing facilities. organisation level emissions videoconferencing facilities are available to all staff and their use is monitored and promoted bemp 3.1.5 11. food waste generated g/meal public administrations owning or managing canteens and coffee bars amount of food waste generated per meal served in canteens and coffee bars organisation level waste bemp 3.1.6 bemps for sustainable energy and climate change 12. carbon emissions of the territory of the municipality kg co2eq/inhabitant all local authorities total annual carbon emissions (as tonnes of co2eq) of the municipality (including housing, industries, agriculture, commerce/services such as construction) divided by the number of inhabitants of the territory territory administered emissions bemps 3.2.1, 3.2.2 13. existence of a municipal energy and climate action plan y/n all local authorities the municipal energy and climate action plan, with long and short-term targets and actions, is based on the inventory of energy use and emissions of the territory territory administered emissions a municipal energy and climate action plan, including targets and actions and based on the inventory of energy use and emissions, is in place bemp 3.2.2 14. adoption of a strategy for climate change adaptation y/n all local authorities a holistic climate change adaptation strategy within the territory of the municipality can build on other local and regional adaptation strategies territory administered a holistic climate change adaptation strategy for the territory of the municipality is in place bemp 3.2.3 15. energy use for street lighting kwh/inhabitant/year mwh/km/year public administrations managing directly or indirectly street lighting annual energy use for street lighting calculated per inhabitant or per km of street lit territory administered energy efficiency street lighting energy use per kilometre is lower than 6 mwh/km/year bemp 3.2.4 16. total annual energy use in public buildings kwh/m2/year public administrations owning or managing buildings total annual energy use in the public building considered (taking into account space heating, space cooling and electricity), expressed as final energy use, divided by the floor area of the building building level energy efficiency for newbuilds, the building is designed with a total primary energy use (including all uses) lower than 60 kwh/m2/year for existing buildings undergoing renovation, the building is designed with a total primary energy use (including all uses) lower than 100 kwh/m2/year bemps 3.2.5, 3.2.6, 3.2.7, 3.2.8 17. training provided to staff on energy efficiency hours/fte/year public administration owning or managing buildings annual number of hours of environment-specific staff training in order to improve energy efficiency in buildings. the annual number of hours of training is divided by the total number of full time equivalent (fte) employees building level energy efficiency bemp 3.2.8 18. co2 emissions from district heating/cooling t co2eq kg co2eq/m2 all local authorities amount of co2eq emissions of the heating and cooling system before and after the installation of a district heating/cooling network, in total or per unit of floor area of the buildings heated or cooled district heating/cooling network emissions bemp 3.2.9 19. share of the energy use met by renewable energy sources % public administration owning or managing buildings renewable energy (electricity and heat separately) produced on site/nearby, divided by the energy use (electricity and heat separately) of the public buildings or social housing building level energy efficiency emissions 100 % of the electricity used in a public building is met by on-site generation of renewable electricity 100 % of the hot water demand in a public building/social housing building is met by on-site renewable heat generation bemp 3.2.10 20. local planning system in place, imposing higher energy standards and renewable energy generation requirements y/n local authorities setting the local building code and/or providing building permits the local planning system includes the provision that newbuilds and renovations within the territory are carried out to exemplary energy standards and have a minimum renewable energy generation requirement territory administered energy efficiency emissions bemp 3.2.11 21. delivery of information and advice services y/n public administrations promoting energy efficiency and renewable energy for residents and businesses the public administration delivers information and advice services on energy efficiency and renewable energy to residents and businesses to reduce their energy consumption territory administered energy efficiency emissions bemp 3.2.13 22. share of the territory covered with thermography % all local authorities area of the urban territory of the municipality which has been covered by thermographic surveying divided by the total urban area of the municipality territory administered energy efficiency emissions recent (< 5 years) high-resolution (< 50 cm) thermographic data is available for 100 % of the built area in the territory of the municipality bemp 3.2.14 bemps for mobility 23. modal share of journeys % public administrations responsible for mobility number of journeys, in the territory considered, carried out by different means of transport (e.g. car, bus, bike), divided by the total number of journeys territory administered emissions the city has a modal split for cycling of 20 % or higher or the city has increased its modal split for cycling by at least 50 % during the last five years. the share of sustainable modes of transport used in the city (e.g. walking, cycling, bus, tram, train) is 60 % or higher bemp 3.3.1, 3.3.2, 3.3.6, 3.3.7, 3.3.8 24. a dedicated policy for walking/cycling is in place y/n public administrations responsible for mobility the city has a dedicated policy that is politically adopted and fosters walking/cycling; additionally, goals for improvement and investments in walking/cycling infrastructure are defined territory administered emissions at least 10 % of the citys investment in transport infrastructure and maintenance is dedicated to cycling infrastructure bemp 3.3.2 25. total length of cycling infrastructure km km of cycle lanes/km of roads public administrations responsible for mobility the length of cycling infrastructure (cycling lanes) can be measured in absolute terms (km) or divided by the length of road networks for vehicles territory administered emissions bemp 3.3.2 26. number of car-sharing users number of users/10 000 inhabitants number of users/number of car-share vehicles public administrations responsible for mobility the number of car-sharing users can be calculated as: the total number of car-sharing users divided by the number of inhabitants, multiplied by 10 000 the total number of car-sharing users divided by the number of car-share vehicles territory administered emissions bemp 3.3.3. 27. shared cars available number of inhabitants/number of shared cars public administrations responsible for mobility the number of inhabitants in the territory of the municipality is divided by the number of cars available in the fleet of the car-sharing scheme territory administered emissions at least 1 shared car available per 2 500 inhabitants bemp 3.3.3 28. privately owned cars replaced number of privately owned cars replaced/number of car-sharing vehicles public administrations responsible for mobility the number of privately owned cars which have been replaced by the car-sharing scheme (owners not needing them any more) divided by the total number of cars available in the fleet of the car-sharing scheme territory administered emissions at least 8 privately owned cars have been replaced by each vehicle in the car-sharing operators fleet bemp 3.3.3 29. share of trips paid for by integrated ticketing % public administrations responsible for public transport number of trips carried out by public transport using multiple modes of transport and paid for by integrated ticketing divided by the total number of trips carried out by public transport using multiple modes of transport territory administered emissions at least 75 % of trips are paid for by the integrated ticket bemp 3.3.4 30. share of electric vehicles % all local authorities the total number of electric vehicles (per type, e.g. e-cars, e-bikes) on the road divided by the total number of vehicles of that type territory administered emissions bemp 3.3.5 31. number of charging points number of charging points/inhabitant all local authorities the total number of public charging points for electric vehicles divided by the number of inhabitants of the territory considered territory administered emissions bemp 3.3.5 32. reduction in the concentration of air pollutants % all local authorities the concentration of air pollutants (pm10, ammonia and nitrogen oxide) is measured regularly in certain areas of the city (e.g. close to schools, parks, residential areas). the reduction in the concentration of air pollutants is calculated as the initial concentration of each air pollutant (before the introduction of the congestion charge) minus the final concentration (after the introduction of the congestion charge) of the air pollutant divided by the initial concentration of air pollutant territory administered emissions the concentration of air pollutants (pm10, ammonia and nitrogen oxide) is reduced by 10 % (on average) within the congestion charge area, compared to the situation before the introduction of the congestion charge bemp 3.3.7 33. reduction in vehicular access to the congestion charge area % all local authorities number of private vehicles accessing the congestion charge area divided by the number of private vehicles accessing the same area before the introduction of the congestion charge congestion charge area emissions vehicular access of non-exempt vehicles to the congestion charge area is reduced by 20 % compared to the situation before the introduction of the congestion charge bemp 3.3.7 34. increased speed and punctuality of public transport % all local authorities average speed of public transport after the implementation of a congestion charge divided by the average speed of public transport before the introduction of the congestion charge. the same can be applied to the punctuality of public transport before and after the introduction of a congestion charge congestion charge area emissions the speed and punctuality of public transport services are improved by 5 % compared to the situation before the introduction of the congestion charge bemp 3.3.7 35. share of available parking spaces during business hours % all local authorities average number of available parking spaces during business hours divided by the total number of parking spaces territory administered emissions on-street parking spaces are between 80 % and 90 % occupied during 90 % of business hours bemp 3.3.8 36. minimum parking requirements y/n all local authorities the public administration can limit free parking spaces (for on-street parking and underground garages) for new developments and can have a formal policy to incrementally remove any previous parking requirements from existing developments territory administered emissions biodiversity the city has no minimum parking requirements (for on-street parking and underground garages) for new developments and has a formal policy to incrementally remove any previous parking requirements from existing developments bemp 3.3.8 37. co2 emissions from delivery vehicles kg co2eq/year kg co2eq/month public administrations responsible for mobility total co2 emissions from delivery vehicles over a specific timespan (e.g. yearly, monthly) in the area served by the logistics service centre area served by the logistics service centre emissions 40 % reduction in co2 emissions from delivery vehicles in the service area compared to the situation before the implementation of the logistics service centre bemp 3.3.9 38. daily number of delivery trips in the service area number of deliveries/day public administrations responsible for mobility number of delivery trips per day by delivery vehicles in the area served by the logistics service centre area served by the logistics service centre emissions 75 % reduction in the number of delivery trips per day to the service area compared to the situation before the implementation of the logistics service centre bemp 3.3.9 bemp for land use 39. share of new built areas % all local authorities responsible for land use planning area of new built area (m2), considering any kind of impermeable built area (buildings, roads, any part with no vegetation or water) divided by the built area at the beginning of the period considered (e.g. 1, 5, 10 years) territory administered biodiversity bemp 3.4.1 40. measures to mitigate the urban heat island effect are promoted y/n all local authorities responsible for land use planning measures to mitigate the urban heat island effect (such as green areas, green roofs or use of reflective materials) are promoted in the territory administered both in private and public buildings and areas territory administered emissions energy efficiency biodiversity bemp 3.4.2 41. low-impact drainage measures are required y/n all local authorities responsible for land use planning there is a requirement for low-impact drainage measures for the construction of new developments, including major redevelopments of existing built areas territory administered biodiversity bemp 3.4.3 bemps for green urban areas 42. share of natural and semi-natural areas % public administrations responsible for the management of green urban areas area (km2) of natural and semi-natural environments in the urban area divided by the total urban area territory administered biodiversity bemp 3.5.1 43. share of green and blue urban areas % public administrations responsible for the management of green urban areas area (km2) of green and blue urban areas (in the urban area) divided by the total urban area territory administered biodiversity bemp 3.5.2 44. share of green roofs % all local authorities responsible for land use planning number of buildings with green roofs divided by the total number of buildings in the territory of the municipality territory administered biodiversity bemp 3.5.3 45. plan regarding derelict green areas and fringe areas y/n all local authorities responsible for land use planning the public administration has a plan regarding the restoration and environmental management of the derelict green areas and fringe areas within the urban area territory administered biodiversity bemp 3.5.4 bemp for local ambient air quality 46. concentration of air pollutants g/m3 all public administrations responsible for the management of air quality level of air pollutants (pm10, pm2,5 , no2) present (annual average) in the urban area sampled in certain locations (e.g. school, parks, residential areas) territory administered emissions for all the indicators defined in this bemp, the results achieve the levels set in the air quality guidelines produced by the world health organisation 3.6.1 bemp for noise pollution 47. share of noise measurement levels exceeding local limit values % public administrations responsible for tackling noise pollution number of measurements of noise levels exceeding the local limit values divided by the total number of noise level measurements territory administered bemp 3.7.1 bemps for water supply 48. penetration rate of water metering % public administrations responsible for potable water supply number of consumers with single meters (at single user level) divided by the total number of consumers territory administered water the penetration rate of water meters at household or final user level is 99 % or higher bemp 3.9.1 49. share of smart water meters % public administrations responsible for potable water supply number of consumers with smart water meters divided by the total number of consumers with water meters territory administered water in water-scarce areas (at least for part of the year), water meters at household/final user level are smart meters all new buildings are equipped with water meters (smart meters in water-scarce areas) bemp 3.9.1 50. water infrastructure leakage index (ili) % public administrations responsible for potable water supply the ili is calculated as current annual real losses (carl)/unavoidable annual real losses (uarl) territory administered water the infrastructure leakage index is lower than 1,5 bemp 3.9.2 bemps for waste water management 51. removal efficiency for water pollutants % public administrations responsible for waste water management the removal efficiency for each water pollutant (cod, bod5, ammonia, total nitrogen and total phosphorus) is calculated as the initial concentration for each water pollutant minus the final concentration of water pollutant divided by the initial concentration of water pollutant waste water treatment plant water the removal efficiencies achieved are: at least 98 % for bod5, at least 90 % for cod, at least 90 % for ammonia, at least 80 % for total organic nitrogen compounds, and at least 90 % for total phosphorus bemp 3.10.1 52. electricity use of waste water treatment kwh/population equivalents/year public administrations responsible for waste water management the total annual electricity use of waste water treatment divided by the number of population equivalents the waste water treatment plant is designed/operates for waste water treatment plant water the electricity use of the waste water treatment plant is: lower than 18 kwh/population equivalents/year for large municipal waste water treatment plants (with a size of more than 10 000 population equivalents) lower than 25 kwh/population equivalents/year for small municipal waste water treatment plants (with a size of less than 10 000 population equivalents) bemp 3.10.1 53. removal efficiency for micropollutants % public administrations responsible for waste water management the removal efficiency is calculated as the initial concentration of micropollutants minus the final concentration of micropollutants divided by the initial concentration of micropollutant waste water treatment plant water the average removal efficiency for micropollutants is higher than 80 % bemp 3.10.2 54. share of waste water flow undergoing tertiary treatment for micropollutants removal % public administrations responsible for waste water management annual waste water flow which undergoes tertiary treatment for micropollutants removal divided by the total annual waste water flow waste water treatment plant water micropollutants are removed from at least 90 % of the annual waste water flow bemp 3.10.2 55. share of own-generated electricity and heat in the waste water treatment plant % public administrations responsible for waste water management energy generated (electricity and heat from biogas) on site from anaerobic digestion of sludge and used in the waste water treatment plant divided by the total amount of energy used in the waste water treatment plant waste water treatment plant water own-generated electricity and heat from biogas cover 100 % of the energy use for municipal waste water treatment plants with a size of more than 10 000 population equivalents without on-site thermal sludge drying, and 50 % in the case of plants with on-site thermal sludge drying bemp 3.10.3 56. share of mono-incinerated sewage sludge % public administrations responsible for waste water management sewage sludge produced in waste water treatment that is mono-incinerated divided by the total amount of sewage sludge generated from waste water treatment waste water treatment plant water bemp 3.10.4 57. share of reclaimed water % public administrations responsible for waste water management amount of reclaimed water produced from waste water treatment divided by the total amount of waste water treated territory administered water bemp 3.10.5 58. share of rainwater retained and infiltrated in urban areas % public administrations responsible for urban drainage and land use planning annual percentage of estimated rainwater which is retained and infiltrated into the ground locally out of the total estimated rainwater falling on the urban area of the municipality territory administered water bemp 3.10.7 bemp for green public procurement 59. share of tenders with environmental criteria % all public administrations number of tenders including environmental criteria divided by the total number of tenders (disaggregated by product category) organisation level energy efficiency material efficiency water waste biodiversity emissions 100 % of tenders include environmental criteria that require at least the level of performance set in the eu gpp criteria, for products where eu gpp criteria are available (e.g. office paper, cleaning agents, furniture) bemp 3.11.1 bemp for environmental education and dissemination of information 60. share of citizens reached directly and indirectly by the environmental education actions % public administrations share of citizens reached directly and indirectly by the environmental education actions territory administered energy efficiency material efficiency water waste biodiversity emissions bemp 3.12.1 (1) the scientific and policy report is publicly available on the jrc website at the following address: http://susproc.jrc.ec.europa.eu/activities/emas/documents/publicadminbemp.pdf the conclusions on best environmental management practices and their applicability as well as the identified specific environmental performance indicators and the benchmarks of excellence contained in this sectoral reference document are based on the findings documented in the scientific and policy report. all the background information and technical details can be found there. (2) council regulation (eec) no 1836/93 of 29 june 1993 allowing voluntary participation by companies in the industrial sector in a community eco-management and audit scheme (oj l 168, 10.7.1993, p. 1). (3) regulation (ec) no 761/2001 of the european parliament and of the council of 19 march 2001 allowing voluntary participation by organisations in a community eco-management and audit scheme (emas) (oj l 114, 24.4.2001, p. 1). (4) according to annex iv (b.e.) of the emas regulation, the environmental statement shall contain a summary of the data available on the performance of the organisation against its environmental objectives and targets with respect to its significant environmental impacts. reporting shall be on the core indicators and on other relevant existing environmental performance indicators as set out in section c. annex iv section c states that each organisation shall also report annually on its performance relating to the more specific environmental aspects as identified in its environmental statement and, where available, take account of sectoral reference documents as referred to in article 46. (5) a detailed description of each of the best practices, with practical guidance on how to implement them, is available in the best practice report published by the jrc and available on-line at: http://susproc.jrc.ec.europa.eu/activities/emas/documents/publicadminbemp.pdf organisations are invited to consult it if interested in learning more about some of the best practices described in this srd. (6) regulation (ec) no 1893/2006 of the european parliament and of the council of 20 december 2006 establishing the statistical classification of economic activities nace revision 2 and amending council regulation (eec) no 3037/90 as well as certain ec regulations on specific statistical domains (oj l 393, 30.12.2006, p. 1). (7) in this emas srd, the terms local authorities and municipalities are considered synonyms and refer to the public bodies governing and providing services to citizens at local level. (8) the specific challenges and opportunities related to the different bemps are addressed either directly in this document or within the practical guidance on how to implement the bemps available in the best practice report published by the jrc and available on-line at: http://susproc.jrc.ec.europa.eu/activities/emas/documents/publicadminbemp.pdf organisations are invited to consult it for a better understanding of the best practices described in this srd. (9) floor area can be calculated taking into account the useful surface area of the building, for example, the surface used in the energy performance certificates. (10) residual waste is the waste fraction that is not sent for re-use, recycling, composting or anaerobic digestion. (11) the number of different sizes (e.g. a4, a3) of paper sheets can be converted to an equivalent number of a4 sheets (e.g. one a3 sheet is equivalent to two a4 sheets). (12) as part of the iso 14000 series of environmental standards, the international standards organisation (iso) has drawn up a subseries (iso 14020) specific to environmental labelling, which covers three types of labelling schemes. in this context, a type i ecolabel is a multi-criteria label developed by a third party. examples are, at eu level, the eu ecolabel or, at national or multilateral level, the blaue engel, the austrian ecolabel and the nordic swan. (13) the colour rendering index of a light bulb specifies the ability for the human eye to distinguish colours under such kind of light. a high colour rendering index is needed in locations where recognising colours well is important. (14) light bulbs with a strong white/cold component can have relevant negative impacts on local fauna. (15) directive 2010/31/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 19 may 2010 on the energy performance of buildings (oj l 153, 18.6.2010, p. 13) (energy performance of buildings directive, epbd) requires member states to set minimum energy performance standards for buildings, which need to be reflected in the national building codes. the directive introduced a benchmarking system to gradually increase the level of ambition of these energy efficiency requirements, keeping them under regular review. (16) the epbd requires that all new buildings consume very low or nearly zero energy (nearly zero energy buildings) by 2020 or by 2018 if occupied and owned by public authorities. (17) the european commission is currently piloting a voluntary reporting framework, level(s), for measuring the overall sustainability performance of buildings throughout their life cycle. more info available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/buildings.htm (18) blue-green networks are natural and semi-natural areas incorporating green spaces (and/or blue if and when aquatic ecosystems are concerned) and other physical features in terrestrial (including coastal) and marine areas. (19) directive 2008/50/ec of the european parliament and of the council of 21 may 2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for europe (oj l 152, 11.6.2008, p. 1). (20) the emas sectoral reference document for the waste management sector is currently under development. the intermediate results as well as the final document, once adopted, are available at: http://susproc.jrc.ec.europa.eu/activities/emas/waste_mgmt.html (21) water-scarce areas are those where there are insufficient water resources to satisfy long-term average requirements. more info available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/quantity/about.htm (22) the current annual real losses (carl) represent the amount of water that is actually lost from the distribution network (i.e. not delivered to final users). the unavoidable annual real losses (uarl) take into consideration that there will always be some leakage in a water distribution network. the uarl is calculated based on factors such as the length of the network, the number of service connections and the pressure at which the network is operating. (23) the following abbreviations are used in the text of the bemp: bod5: biochemical oxygen demand in 5 days; mlss: mixed liquor suspended solids (biomass in the activated sludge system); cod: chemical oxygen demand. (24) population equivalents, or p.e., term used in the council directive 91/271/eec of 21 may 1991 concerning urban waste water treatment (oj l 135, 30.5.1991, p. 40), covers the organic pollution generated by the residents of a city, town or village, and other sources such as non-resident population and agro-food industries. (25) doc: dissolved organic carbon. (26) n : normal litre, i.e. volume of gas measured at standard conditions (pressure: 1,01325 bar; temperature: 0 oc) (27) the best available techniques (bat) reference documents (brefs) according to the industrial emissions directive are available at: http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reference/ (28) directive 2010/75/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 24 november 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) (oj l 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17). (29) in combined sewer systems, waste water and storm water (from storm or rain events) are collected in the same sewer network. in separate sewer systems, waste water and storm water are collected and sent for treatment or discharge via separate sewer networks. (30) for information on the eu green public procurement criteria and the complete list of products covered, please see: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/gpp/index_en.htm. (31) in order to not restrict the number of tenders, in the technical specifications reference can be made to the criteria of the eu ecolabel for that specific product or service group; for verification, a valid licence of the eu ecolabel can be required. according to art. 44(2) of directive 2014/24/eu of the european parliament and of the council of 26 february 2014 on public procurement and repealing directive 2004/18/ec (oj l 94, 28.3.2014, p. 65), contracting authorities must also accept other appropriate means of proof.

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/64 of 14 january 2019 amending decision 2011/163/eu on the approval of plans submitted by third countries in accordance with article 29 of council directive 96/23/ec (notified under document c(2019) 25) (text with eea relevance.) type: decision_impl subject matter: agricultural policy; health; trade; animal product; europe; asia and oceania; fisheries; processed agricultural produce date published: 2019-01-16 16.1.2019 en official journal of the european union l 13/2 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/64 of 14 january 2019 amending decision 2011/163/eu on the approval of plans submitted by third countries in accordance with article 29 of council directive 96/23/ec (notified under document c(2019) 25) (text with eea relevance) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to council directive 96/23/ec of 29 april 1996 on measures to monitor certain substances and residues thereof in live animals and animal products and repealing directives 85/358/eec and 86/469/eec and decisions 89/187/eec and 91/664/eec (1), and in particular the fourth subparagraph of article 29(1) thereof, whereas: (1) article 29 of directive 96/23/ec requires that third countries from which member states are authorised to import animals and animal products covered by that directive submit residue monitoring plans providing required guarantees (the plans). the plans should cover at least the groups of residues and substances listed in annex i to that directive. (2) commission decision 2011/163/eu (2) approves the plans submitted by certain third countries concerning specified animal and animal products listed in the annex to that decision (the list). (3) in the light of the recent plans submitted by certain third countries and additional information obtained by the commission, it is necessary to update the list. (4) japan has submitted plans for porcine, poultry, milk and eggs to the commission. these plans provide sufficient guarantees and should be approved. entries for japan regarding porcine, poultry, milk and eggs should therefore be included in the list. decision 2011/163/eu should therefore be amended accordingly. (5) albania has submitted plan for aquaculture finfish and not for all aquaculture products. in the light of the information provided by albania, an asterisk in the relevant column should be added for limiting the approval to aquaculture finfish only. (6) the measures provided for in this decision are in accordance with the opinion of the standing committee on plants, animals, food and feed, has adopted this decision: article 1 the annex to decision 2011/163/eu is replaced by the text set out in the annex to this decision. article 2 this decision is addressed to the member states. done at brussels, 14 january 2019. for the commission vytenis andriukaitis member of the commission (1) oj l 125, 23.5.1996, p. 10. (2) commission decision 2011/163/eu of 16 march 2011 on the approval of plans submitted by third countries in accordance with article 29 of council directive 96/23/ec (oj l 70, 17.3.2011, p. 40). annex annex code iso2 country bovine ovine/caprine porcine equine poultry aqua-culture milk eggs rabbit wild game farmed game honey ad andorra x x x (3) x x ae united arab emirates x (3) x (1) al albania x x (9) x am armenia x x ar argentina x x x x x x x x x x x au australia x x x x x x x x ba bosnia and herzegovina x x x x x x x x bd bangladesh x bf burkina faso x bj benin x bn brunei x br brazil x x x x x bw botswana x x x by belarus x (2) x x x bz belize x ca canada x x x x x x x x x x x x ch switzerland x x x x x x x x x x x x cl chile x x x x x x x x cm cameroon x cn china x x x x x co colombia x x cr costa rica x cu cuba x x do dominican republic x ec ecuador x et ethiopia x fk falklands islands x x x fo faeroe islands x ge georgia x gh ghana x gl greenland x x gt guatemala x x hn honduras x id indonesia x il israel (7) x x x x x x in india x x x ir iran x jm jamaica x jp japan x x x x x x ke kenya x kg kyrgyzstan x kr south korea x x lk sri lanka x ma morocco x x md moldova x x x x me montenegro x x x x x x x x mg madagascar x x mk former yugoslav republic of macedonia (4) x x x x x x x x x mm republic of the union of myanmar x mu mauritius x x (3) mx mexico x x x my malaysia x (3) x mz mozambique x na namibia x x nc new caledonia x (3) x x x x ni nicaragua x x nz new zealand x x x x x x x x pa panama x pe peru x ph philippines x pm saint pierre and miquelon x pn pitcairn islands x py paraguay x rs serbia (5) x x x x (2) x x x x x x ru russia x x x x x x x (6) x rw rwanda x sa saudi arabia x sg singapore x (3) x (3) x (3) x (8) x (3) x x (3) x (8) x (8) sm san marino x x (3) x x sr suriname x sv el salvador x sz swaziland x th thailand x x x tn tunisia x x x tr turkey x x x x x tw taiwan x x tz tanzania x x ua ukraine x x x x x x x x ug uganda x x us united states x x x x x x x x x x x uy uruguay x x x x x x x ve venezuela x vn vietnam x x za south africa x zm zambia x (1) camel milk only. (2) export to the union of live equidae for slaughter (food producing animals only). (3) third countries using only raw material either from member states or from other third countries approved for imports of such raw material to the union, in accordance with article 2. (4) the former yugoslav republic of macedonia; the definitive nomenclature for this country will be agreed following current negotiations at un level. (5) not including kosovo (this designation is without prejudice to positions on status, and is in line with unscr 1244 and the icj opinion on the kosovo declaration of independence). (6) only for reindeer from the murmansk and yamalo-nenets regions. (7) hereafter understood as the state of israel, excluding the territories under israeli administration since june 1967, namely the golan heights, the gaza strip, east jerusalem and the rest of the west bank. (8) only for commodities of fresh meat originating from new zealand, destined to the union and being unloaded, reloaded and transited with or without storage through singapore. (9) finfish only.

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/60 of 11 january 2019 amending decision 2009/866/ec, decision 2010/419/eu, implementing decision 2012/651/eu and implementing decision (eu) 2016/1685 as regards the representative of the authorisation holder (notified under document c(2019) 15) (text with eea relevance.) type: decision_impl subject matter: marketing; health; agricultural activity; plant product; technology and technical regulations; foodstuff date published: 2019-01-15 15.1.2019 en official journal of the european union l 12/31 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/60 of 11 january 2019 amending decision 2009/866/ec, decision 2010/419/eu, implementing decision 2012/651/eu and implementing decision (eu) 2016/1685 as regards the representative of the authorisation holder (notified under document c(2019) 15) (only the dutch and french texts are authentic) (text with eea relevance) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 of the european parliament and of the council of 22 september 2003 on genetically modified food and feed (1), and in particular to article 9(2) and article 21(2) thereof, whereas: (1) by letters dated 15 february and 28 march 2017, syngenta crop protection ag requested the commission that, following a reorganisation of the syngenta group, all authorisations and pending applications for genetically modified products should be transferred from its current representative syngenta france sas to the representative syngenta crop protection nv/sa, belgium. (2) the commission informed syngenta crop protection ag that in order to proceed with those transfers, the request should be confirmed by letters from both syngenta france sas and syngenta crop protection nv/sa, belgium confirming their agreement with those transfers. the commission received those letters on 1 march 2018. (3) the implementation of the requested change requires the amendment of decisions authorising the placing on the market of genetically modified products for which syngenta crop protection ag is the authorisation holder. in particular, the following decisions should be amended: commission decisions 2009/866/ec (2) and 2010/419/eu (3) and commission implementing decision 2012/651/eu (4) and (eu) 2016/1685 (5). (4) the proposed amendments to the authorisation decisions are purely administrative in nature and do not entail a new assessment of the products concerned. (5) with regard to pending applications for which syngenta crop protection ag is the applicant, the requested change is to be formalised at the moment of the adoption of the corresponding authorisations. (6) the measures provided for in this decision are in accordance with the opinion of the standing committee on plants, animals, food and feed, has adopted this decision: article 1 amendment to decision 2009/866/ec decision 2009/866/ec is amended as follows: (1) in article 6, syngenta seeds s.a.s., france is replaced by syngenta crop protection nv/sa, belgium; (2) in article 8, seeds s.a.s., chemin de l'hobit 12, bp 27 f-31790 saint-sauveur france is replaced by syngenta crop protection nv/sa, avenue louise 489, 1050 brussels, belgium; (3) in point (a) of the annex, the name syngenta seeds s.a.s. is replaced by syngenta crop protection nv/sa; the address chemin de l'hobit 12, bp 27 f-31790 saint-sauveur france is replaced by avenue louise 489, 1050 brussels, belgium. article 2 amendment to decision 2010/419/eu decision 2010/419/eu is amended as follows: (1) in article 6, syngenta seeds sas, france is replaced by syngenta crop protection nv/sa, belgium; (2) in article 9, syngenta seeds sas, chemin de l'hobit 12, bp 27, 31790 saint-sauveur, france is replaced by syngenta crop protection nv/sa, avenue louise 489, 1050 brussels, belgium; (3) in point (a) of the annex, the name syngenta seeds sas is replaced by syngenta crop protection nv/sa; the address chemin de l'hobit 12, bp 27, 31790 saint-sauveur, france is replaced by avenue louise 489, 1050 brussels, belgium. article 3 amendment to implementing decision 2012/651/eu implementing decision 2012/651/eu is amended as follows: (1) in article 6, syngenta seeds sas, france is replaced by syngenta crop protection nv/sa, belgium; (2) in article 8, syngenta seeds sas, 12, chemin de l'hobit, 31790 saint-sauveur, france is replaced by syngenta crop protection nv/sa, avenue louise 489, 1050 brussels, belgium; (3) in point (a) of the annex, the name syngenta seed sas is replaced by syngenta crop protection nv/sa; the address 12, chemin de l'hobit, 31790 saint-sauveur, france is replaced by avenue louise 489, 1050 brussels, belgium. article 4 amendment to implementing decision (eu) 2016/1685 implementing decision (eu) 2016/1685 is amended as follows: (1) in article 7, syngenta france sas is replaced by syngenta crop protection nv/sa, belgium; (2) in article 10, syngenta france sas, 12, chemin de l'hobit, 31790 saint-sauveur, france is replaced by syngenta crop protection nv/sa, avenue louise 489, 1050 brussels, belgium; (3) in point (a) of the annex, the name syngenta france sas is replaced by syngenta crop protection nv/sa; the address 12, chemin de l'hobit, 31790 saint-sauveur, france is replaced by avenue louise 489, 1050 brussels, belgium. article 5 addressee this decision is addressed to syngenta crop protection nv/sa, avenue louise 489, 1050 brussels, belgium. done at brussels, 11 january 2019. for the commission vytenis andriukaitis member of the commission (1) oj l 268, 18.10.2003, p. 1. (2) commission decision 2009/866/ec of 30 november 2009 authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize mir604 (syn-ir64-5) pursuant to regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 314, 1.12.2009, p. 102). (3) commission decision 2010/419/eu of 28 july 2010 renewing the authorisation for continued marketing of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize bt11 (syn-bt11-1), authorising foods and food ingredients containing or consisting of field maize bt11 (syn-bt11-1) pursuant to regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 of the european parliament and of the council and repealing decision 2004/657/ec (oj l 197, 29.7.2010, p. 11). (4) commission implementing decision 2012/651/eu of 18 october 2012 authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize mir162 (syn-ir162-4) pursuant to regulation (ec) no 1829/2003 of the european parliament and of the council (oj l 290, 20.10.2012, p. 14). (5) commission implementing decision (eu) 2016/1685 of 16 september 2016 authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize bt11 mir162 mir604 ga21, and genetically modified maizes combining two or three of the events bt11, mir162, mir604 and ga21, and repealing decisions 2010/426/eu, 2011/892/eu, 2011/893/eu and 2011/894/eu (oj l 254, 20.9.2016, p. 22).

name: council decision (eu) 2019/41 of 3 december 2018 on the position to be taken, on behalf of the european union, within the association committee established by the euro-mediterranean agreement establishing an association between the european communities and their member states, of the one part, and the hashemite kingdom of jordan, of the other part, as regards an amendment to protocol 3 to that agreement concerning the definition of the concept of originating products and methods of administrative cooperation type: decision subject matter: regions and regional policy; european construction; international affairs; executive power and public service; asia and oceania; international trade; cooperation policy date published: 2019-01-11 11.1.2019 en official journal of the european union l 9/114 council decision (eu) 2019/41 of 3 december 2018 on the position to be taken, on behalf of the european union, within the association committee established by the euro-mediterranean agreement establishing an association between the european communities and their member states, of the one part, and the hashemite kingdom of jordan, of the other part, as regards an amendment to protocol 3 to that agreement concerning the definition of the concept of originating products and methods of administrative cooperation the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, and in particular the first subparagraph of article 207(4), in conjunction with article 218(9) thereof, having regard to the proposal from the european commission, whereas: (1) the euro-mediterranean agreement establishing an association between the european communities and their member states, of the one part, and the hashemite kingdom of jordan, of the other part (1) (the agreement) entered into force on 1 may 2002. pursuant to article 89 of the agreement, an association council was established to examine any major issues arising within the framework of this agreement and any other bilateral or international issues of mutual interest. (2) pursuant to article 92 of the agreement, an association committee was established which shall be responsible for the implementation of the agreement and to which the association council may delegate, in full or in part, any of its powers. (3) pursuant to article 94(1) of the agreement, the association committee is to have the power to take decisions for the management of the agreement as well as in areas where the association council has delegated its powers to it. (4) pursuant to article 2 of council and commission decision 2002/357/ec, ecsc (2), the position to be taken by the union within the association committee shall be laid down by the council, on a proposal by the commission. (5) it is appropriate to establish the position to be taken on the union's behalf in the eu-jordan association committee, as the decision of the association committee amending the provisions of protocol 3 to the agreement, concerning the definition of the concept of originating products and the list of working or processing required to be carried out on non-originating materials in order for certain categories of products, manufactured in the territory of the hashemite kingdom of jordan (jordan), and connected with generating employment for syrian refugees and jordanians, to obtain originating status, will be binding on the union. (6) pursuant to article 39 of protocol 3 to the agreement, as amended by decision no 1/2006 of the eu-jordan association council (3), the association committee may decide to amend the provisions of that protocol. (7) pursuant to the protocol 3 to the agreement, as amended by decision no 1/2016 concerning the definition of the concept of originating products and the list of working or processing required to be carried out on non-originating materials in order for certain categories of products, manufactured in the territory of jordan, and connected with generating employment for syrian refugees and jordanians, to obtain originating status, jordan submitted proposals for further relaxation of the scheme introduced by decision no 1/2016. (8) as a result of the examination of jordan's request, the council, on behalf of the union, considers it justified to agree on additional flexibilities of the rules of origin scheme, notably as concerns abandoning the zone requirement, setting a requirement for the syrian workforce at the level of 15 % of total workforce throughout the scheme for each production facility, and extending the validity of the scheme until 31 december 2030. (9) the annex to the decision of the association committee attached to this decision (the decision of the association committee) should apply until 31 december 2030. (10) the achievement by jordan of its objective of creating at least 60 000 legal and active job opportunities, in particular corresponding to active work permits or other measurable means corresponding to legal and active employment determined by the association committee, for syrian refugees would also represent a significant milestone in respect of the implementation of the decision of the association committee. accordingly, when this objective is achieved, the union and jordan should, also taking into account the modernisation of the regional convention on pan-euro-mediterranean preferential rules of origin, extend the coverage of the decision of the association committee to include all production in jordan of products covered by that decision without the requirement to satisfy the specific conditions set out in article 1(1)(b) of the annex to the decision of the association committee. (11) if the objective of creating a total number of at least 60 000 legal and active job opportunities, in particular corresponding to active work permits or other measurable means corresponding to legal and active employment determined by the association committee, for syrian refugees is not achieved, the specific conditions set out in article 1(1)(b) of the annex to the decision of the association committee should apply. (12) the application of the annex to the decision of the association committee should be accompanied by appropriate monitoring and reporting obligations and may be suspended if the conditions for its application are no longer fulfilled or if the conditions for safeguard measures are met, has adopted this decision: article 1 the position to be adopted on behalf of the union within the eu-jordan association committee established by article 92 of the agreement, as regards the amendment of protocol 3 to that agreement concerning the definition of the concept of originating products and methods of administrative cooperation, shall be based on the draft decision of the association committee, attached to this decision. article 2 after its adoption, the decision of the association committee shall be published in the official journal of the european union. article 3 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption. done at brussels, 3 december 2018. for the council the president n. hofer (1) oj l 129, 15.5.2002, p. 3. (2) council and commission decision 2002/357/ec, ecsc of 26 march 2002 on the conclusion of the euro-mediterranean agreement establishing an association between the european communities and their member states, of the one part, and the hashemite kingdom of jordan, of the other part (oj l 129, 15.5.2002, p. 1). (3) decision no 1/2006 of the eu-jordan association council of 15 june 2006 amending protocol 3 to the euro-mediterranean agreement, concerning the definition of the concept of originating products and methods of administrative cooperation (oj l 209, 31.7.2006, p. 30). draft decision no / of the eu-jordan association committee of amending the provisions of protocol 3 to the euro-mediterranean agreement establishing an association between the european communities and their member states, of the one part, and the hashemite kingdom of jordan, of the other part, concerning the definition of the concept of originating products and the list of working or processing required to be carried out on non-originating materials in order for certain categories of products, manufactured in the territory of the hashemite kingdom of jordan, and connected with generating employment for syrian refugees and jordanians, to obtain originating status the eu-jordan association committee, having regard to the euro-mediterranean agreement establishing an association between the european communities and their member states, of the one part, and the hashemite kingdom of jordan, of the other part, (the agreement), and in particular article 94 of the agreement and article 39 of protocol 3 to the agreement, whereas: (1) since the entry into force of decision no 1/2016 of the eu-jordan association committee (1) until march 2018, eleven companies registered to benefit from the relaxed rules of origin scheme. (2) between january 2016 and october 2018, the hashemite kingdom of jordan (jordan) issued over 120 000 work permits to syrian refugees, of which approximately 42 000 were active work permits during the third quarter of 2018. (3) in december 2017, jordan presented the first annual report on the implementation of decision no 1/2016, concerning the definition of the concept of originating products and the list of working or processing required to be carried out on non-originating materials in order for certain categories of products, manufactured in the territory of jordan, and connected with generating employment for syrian refugees and jordanians, to obtain originating status. (4) following the findings of the report, jordan made a request to review decision no 1/2016 and to introduce additional flexibilities. the union considered that certain improvements of the scheme shall further contribute to a higher employment of syrian refugees, as well as of jordanians. (5) the further revision of requirements applicable to economic operators that wish to benefit from the rules of origin scheme would be subject to certain conditions with a view to ensuring that the benefits go hand in hand with the jordanian efforts of employing syrian refugees. (6) the annex to this decision applies to goods produced in production facilities located in jordan and aims at contributing to the generation of employment for syrian refugees and for the jordanian population. (7) the objective of this amendment is to improve the original initiative in order to improve the effects of the scheme on the jordanian economy and to contribute to increasing the number of syrian refugees legally employed in jordan, as well as jordanians. (8) there should be a possibility of temporarily suspending the application of the annex to this decision, if the conditions set out in article 1(1), (2) and (3) of the annex to this decision are not met. (9) there should also be a possibility of temporarily suspending the application of the annex to this decision with respect to any of the products listed in article 2 of the annex to this decision imported in such increased quantities and under such conditions as to cause, or threaten to cause, serious injuries to union producers of like or directly competing products in all or part of the territory of the union or serious disturbances in any sector of the economy of the union, in accordance with articles 24 and 26 of the agreement. (10) this decision should be valid for a limited period sufficient to provide an incentive for additional investment and employment generation and should therefore expire on 31 december 2030. (11) the achievement by jordan of its objective of creating at least 60 000 legal and active job opportunities, in particular corresponding to active work permits or other measurable means corresponding to legal and active employment determined by the association committee, for syrian refugees would also represent a significant milestone. accordingly, when this objective is achieved, the union and jordan should, also taking into account the modernisation of the regional convention on pan-euro-mediterranean preferential rules of origin, extend the coverage of this decision to include all production in jordan of products covered by this decision without the need to satisfy the specific conditions set out in article 1(1)(b) of the annex to this decision. (12) if the objective of creating at least 60 000 legal and active job opportunities, in particular corresponding to active work permits or other measurable means corresponding to legal and active employment determined by the association committee, for syrian refugees is not achieved, the specific conditions set out in article 1(1)(b) of the annex to this decision should apply. (13) jordan will develop a clear and stable legal framework for decent employment of syrian refugees. specifically, jordan will continue to expand the sectors and occupations open to refugees, mainly at technical level, with a particular focus on women's participation. in implementing the national empowerment and employment programme (neep) and in calculating the participation of non-jordanians working across multiple sectors, jordan will exempt refugees from possible reductions in the percentage of non-jordanians. jordan will also ensure that the cost of obtaining the right to work for syrian refugees is permanently waived. (14) jordan will, with assistance from the eu where appropriate, ensure a clear framework for the set-up of joint ventures between jordanians and third-country nationals, including syrian refugees, focusing particularly on women, ensuring that the rights of both parties are upheld, that ownership is clarified and that access to finance is facilitated. (15) jordan will take necessary steps towards facilitating investment and improving the overall business climate. to that end, jordan will adopt and implement an action plan in close consultation with the european union. in particular, jordan will create stronger synergies between public sector entities, the private sector and donors, in an effort to improve the business environment and attract investment. to complement this action, the international community will provide firm-level assistance and programmes, aimed at increasing the export capability of jordanian firms in sectors where the country has a competitive advantage in the global market. (16) jordan will ensure regulatory predictability, with the aim of reducing red tape and costs for investors. this includes the development of incentives for business formalisation, streamlining the process for company registration, adopting a stable legal infrastructure for insolvency, corporate taxation, bank lending, as well as developing non-bank financial institutions, and reducing the administrative burden for companies requiring an export license. (17) jordan will organise a business and investors' conference in jordan in due time to showcase the reformed scheme that was initially supposed to take place in autumn 2017 in jordan. (18) jordan supports the modernisation of the regional convention on pan-euro-mediterranean preferential rules of origin with the aim of improving market access conditions for jordanian exports in the european union and to expand regional trade and economic integration, has adopted this decision: article 1 1. annex ii(a) to protocol 3 to the agreement, containing the conditions for application and the list of working or processing required to be carried out on non-originating materials in order for the product manufactured in jordan connected with the additional employment of syrian refugees to obtain originating status, is hereby replaced by a new version of annex ii(a) to protocol 3 to the agreement, contained in the annex to this decision. 2. annex ii(a) to protocol 3 to the agreement shall apply until 31 december 2030. article 2 the annex shall form an integral part of this decision. article 3 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption by the association committee. done at [amman][brussels], [x/x/]2018 for the eu-jordan association committee the president (1) decision no 1/2016 of the eu-jordan association committee of 19 july 2016 amending the provisions of protocol 3 to the euro-mediterranean agreement establishing an association between the european communities and their member states, of the one part, and the hashemite kingdom of jordan, of the other part, concerning the definition of the concept of originating products and the list of working or processing required to be carried out on non-originating materials in order for certain categories of products, manufactured in dedicated development zones and industrial areas, and connected with generating employment for syrian refugees and jordanians, to obtain originating status [2016/1436] (oj l 233, 30.8.2016, p. 6). annex annex ii(a) addendum to the list of working or processing required to be carried out on non-originating materials in order for the product manufactured to obtain originating status article 1 common provisions a. definition of origin 1. for the products listed in article 2, the following rules may also apply instead of the rules set out in annex ii of protocol 3 provided that such products respect the following conditions: (a) the required working or processing to be carried out on non-originating materials in order for such products to obtain originating status takes place in production facilities located in the territory of jordan; and (b) the total work force of each production facility located in the territory of jordan where such products are worked or processed contains a proportion of syrian refugees equivalent to at least 15 % (calculated individually for each production facility). 2. the relevant proportion pursuant to subparagraph 1(b) shall be calculated at any point after the entry into force of this annex and on an annual basis thereafter taking into account the number of syrian refugees who are employed in formal and decent jobs and on a full-time equivalent basis, and who have received a work permit valid for a minimum period of 12 months under the applicable legislation of jordan. 3. the competent authorities of jordan shall monitor that the eligible production facilities comply with the conditions set out in paragraph 1, shall grant to production facilities fulfilling such conditions an authorisation number and shall promptly withdraw such authorisation number where the production facilities no longer fulfil such conditions. b. proof of origin 4. a proof of origin made out pursuant to this annex shall contain the following statement in english: derogation annex ii(a) of protocol 3 authorisation number granted by the competent authorities of jordan. c. administrative cooperation 5. when, in accordance with article 33(5) of this protocol, as amended by decision no 1/2006 of the eu-jordan association council (1), the customs authorities of jordan inform the european commission or the requesting customs authorities of the member states of the european union (the member states) of the results of the verification, they shall specify that the products listed in article 2 fulfil the conditions set out in paragraph 1. 6. where the verification procedure or any other available information appears to indicate that the conditions set out in paragraph 1 are not fulfilled, jordan shall, on its own initiative or at the request of the european commission or the customs authorities of the member states, carry out appropriate inquiries or arrange for such inquiries to be carried out with due urgency to identify and prevent such violations. for that purpose, the european commission or the customs authorities of the member states may participate in the inquiries. d. report, monitoring and review 7. each year after the entry into force of this annex, jordan shall submit a report to the european commission on the operation and effects of this annex, including production and export statistics at 8 digit level or the highest level of detail available for the products covered by the scheme. jordan shall also submit a list identifying the production facilities in jordan and specifying the percentage of syrian refugees employed in each individual production facility on a year-by-year basis. jordan shall also report, on a quarterly basis, on the overall number of active work permits or other measurable means corresponding to legal and active employment determined by the association committee. the parties shall jointly review such reports and any issues relating to the implementation and monitoring of this annex within the bodies established by the association agreement and in particular in the sub-committee on industry, trade and services. the parties shall also ensure the involvement of relevant international organisations, such as the international labour organisation and the world bank, in the monitoring process. 8. once jordan achieves its target of facilitating a greater participation of syrian refugees in the formal labour market by issuing at least 60 000 active work permits, or other measurable means corresponding to legal and active employment determined by the association committee, to syrian refugees, the parties shall apply the provisions of this annex to all products covered by this annex without the requirement to comply with the specific conditions set out in subparagraph 1(b). 9. if the union considers that there is insufficient evidence of jordan complying with the conditions set out in paragraph 8, the union may refer the matter to the association committee. if the association committee fails to declare within 90 days of the referral of the matter that the conditions set out in paragraph 8 are met or to amend this annex, the union may decide that the specific conditions set out in subparagraph 1(b) shall apply. e. temporary suspension 10. (a) without prejudice to paragraphs 8 and 9, the union may, if it considers that there is insufficient evidence of jordan or any specific production facility complying with the conditions set out in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, refer the matter to the association committee. that referral shall identify whether the failure to comply with the conditions set out in paragraph 1 is attributable to jordan or any specific production facility. (b) if the association committee fails to declare within 90 days of the referral of the matter that the conditions set out in paragraph 1 are met or to amend this annex, the application of this annex shall be suspended. the extent of the suspension shall be that identified in the referral of the union to the association committee. (c) the association committee may also decide to extend the 90-day period. in that case, the suspension shall take effect where the association council has failed to take any of the actions identified in point (b) within the extended period of time. (d) the application of this annex may resume if the association committee so decides. (e) in case of a suspension, this annex shall continue to apply for a period of four months in relation to products which are, on the date of temporary suspension of the annex, either in transit or in temporary storage in customs warehouses or in free zones in the union, and for which a proof of origin was properly made out in accordance with the provisions of this annex prior to the date of temporary suspension. f. safeguard mechanism 11. where a product listed in article 2 benefiting from the application of this annex is imported in such increased quantities and under such conditions as to cause, or threaten to cause, serious injury to union producers of like or directly competitive products in all or part of the territory of the union or serious disturbances in any sector of the economy of the union, in accordance with articles 24 and 26 of the agreement, the union may refer the matter for examination to the association committee. if within 90 days of the matter being referred to it, the association committee fails to adopt a decision putting an end to such serious injury or threat thereof or serious disturbances or if no other satisfactory solution has been reached, the application of this annex shall be suspended with respect to that product, until the association committee adopts a decision declaring that they have ended or until a satisfactory solution has been reached by the parties and is notified to the association committee. g. entry into force and application 12. this annex shall apply from the day of entry into force of the association committee decision to which it is attached and shall apply until 31 december 2030. article 2 list of products and of required working and processing the list of products to which this annex applies and the rules of working and processing that may be applied as an alternative to those listed in annex ii are set out below. annex i to protocol 3 of the agreement containing the introductory notes to the list in annex ii to protocol 3 of the agreement applies mutatis mutandis to the list below, subject to the following amendments: in note 5.2, the following basic materials are added in the second paragraph: glass fibres; metal fibres. in note 7.3, the text is replaced by the following: for the purposes of headings ex 2707 and 2713, simple operations, such as cleaning, decanting, desalting, water-separation, filtering, colouring, marking, obtaining a sulphur-content as a result of mixing products with different sulphur-contents, or any combination of these operations or like operations, do not confer origin. ex chapter 25 salt; sulphur; earths and stone; plastering materials, lime and cement; except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product. ex 2519 crushed natural magnesium carbonate (magnesite), in hermetically-sealed containers, and magnesium oxide, whether or not pure, other than fused magnesia or dead-burned (sintered) magnesia. manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product. however, natural magnesium carbonate (magnesite) may be used. ex chapter 27 mineral fuels, mineral oils and products of their distillation; bituminous substances; mineral waxes, except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product. ex 2707 oils in which the weight of the aromatic constituents exceeds that of the non-aromatic constituents, being oils similar to mineral oils obtained by distillation of high temperature coal tar, of which more than 65 % by volume distils at a temperature of up to 250 c (including mixtures of petroleum spirit and benzole), for use as power or heating fuels. operations of refining and/or one or more specific process(es) (2) or other operations in which all the materials used are classified within a heading other than that of the product. however, materials of the same heading as the product may be used, provided that their total value does not exceed 50 % of the ex-works price of the product. 2710 petroleum oils and oils obtained from bituminous materials, other than crude; preparations not elsewhere specified or included, containing by weight 70 % or more of petroleum oils or of oils obtained from bituminous materials, these oils being the basic constituents of the preparations; waste oils. operations of refining and/or one or more specific process(es) (3) or other operations in which all the materials used are classified within a heading other than that of the product. however, materials of the same heading as the product may be used, provided that their total value does not exceed 50 % of the ex-works price of the product. 2711 petroleum gases and other gaseous hydrocarbons. operations of refining and/or one or more specific process(es) or other operations in which all the materials used are classified within a heading other than that of the product. however, materials of the same heading as the product may be used, provided that their total value does not exceed 50 % of the ex-works price of the product. 2712 petroleum jelly; paraffin wax, microcrystalline petroleum wax, slack wax, ozokerite, lignite wax, peat wax, other mineral waxes, and similar products obtained by synthesis or by other processes, whether or not coloured. operations of refining and/or one or more specific process(es) (3) or other operations in which all the materials used are classified within a heading other than that of the product. however, materials of the same heading as the product may be used, provided that their total value does not exceed 50 % of the ex-works price of the product. 2713 petroleum coke, petroleum bitumen and other residues of petroleum oils or of oils obtained from bituminous materials. operations of refining and/or one or more specific process(es) (2) or other operations in which all the materials used are classified within a heading other than that of the product. however, materials of the same heading as the product may be used, provided that their total value does not exceed 50 % of the ex-works price of the product. ex chapter 28 inorganic chemicals; organic or inorganic compounds of precious metals, of rare-earth metals, of radioactive elements or of isotopes; except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product. however, materials of the same heading as the product may be used, provided that their total value does not exceed 20 % of the ex-works price of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product. ex 2811 sulphur trioxide; and manufacture from sulphur dioxide or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product. ex 2840 sodium perborate; manufacture from disodium tetraborate pentahydrate or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product. 2843 colloidal precious metals; inorganic or organic compounds of precious metals, whether or not chemically defined; amalgams of precious metals manufacture from materials of any heading, including other materials of heading 2843 . ex 2852 mercury compounds of internal ethers and their halogenated, sulphonated, nitrated or nitrosated derivatives. manufacture from materials of any heading. however, the value of all the materials of heading 2909 used shall not exceed 20 % of the ex-works price of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product. mercury compounds of nucleic acids and their salts, whether or not chemically defined; other heterocyclic compounds. manufacture from materials of any heading. however, the value of all the materials of headings 2852 , 2932 , 2933 and 2934 used shall not exceed 20 % of the ex-works price of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product. ex chapter 29 organic chemicals; except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product. however, materials of the same heading as the product may be used, provided that their total value does not exceed 20 % of the ex-works price of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product. ex 2905 metal alcoholates of alcohols of this heading and of ethanol; except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, including other materials of heading 2905 . however, metal alcoholates of this heading may be used, provided that their total value does not exceed 20 % of the ex-works price of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product. 2905 43 ; 2905 44 ; 2905 45 mannitol; d-glucitol (sorbitol); glycerol manufacture from materials of any sub-heading, except that of the product. however, materials of the same sub-heading as the product may be used, provided that their total value does not exceed 20 % of the ex-works price of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 2915 saturated acyclic monocarboxylic acids and their anhydrides, halides, peroxides and peroxyacids; their halogenated, sulphonated, nitrated or nitrosated derivatives manufacture from materials of any heading. however, the value of all the materials of headings 2915 and 2916 used shall not exceed 20 % of the ex-works price of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex 2932 internal ethers and their halogenated, sulphonated, nitrated or nitrosated derivatives manufacture from materials of any heading. however, the value of all the materials of heading 2909 used shall not exceed 20 % of the ex-works price of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product cyclic acetals and internal hemiacetals and their halogenated, sulphonated, nitrated or nitrosated derivatives manufacture from materials of any heading or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 2933 heterocyclic compounds with nitrogen hetero-atom(s) only manufacture from materials of any heading. however, the value of all the materials of headings 2932 and 2933 used shall not exceed 20 % of the ex-works price of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 2934 nucleic acids and their salts, whether or not chemically defined; other heterocyclic compounds manufacture from materials of any heading. however, the value of all the materials of headings 2932 , 2933 and 2934 used shall not exceed 20 % of the ex-works price of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product chapter 31 fertilisers manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product. however, materials of the same heading as the product may be used, provided that their total value does not exceed 20 % of the ex-works price of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product chapter 32 tanning or dyeing extracts; tannins and their derivatives; dyes, pigments and other colouring matter; paints and varnishes; putty and other mastics; inks manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product. however, materials of the same heading as the product may be used, provided that their total value does not exceed 20 % of the ex-works price of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex chapter 33 essential oils and resinoids; perfumery, cosmetic or toilet preparations; except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product. however, materials of the same heading as the product may be used, provided that their total value does not exceed 20 % of the ex-works price of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex 3301 essential oils (terpeneless or not), including concretes and absolutes; resinoids; extracted oleoresins; concentrates of essential oils in fats, in fixed oils, in waxes or the like, obtained by enfleurage or maceration; terpenic by-products of the deterpenation of essential oils; aqueous distillates and aqueous solutions of essential oils. manufacture from materials of any heading, including materials of a different group (4) in this heading. however, materials of the same group as the product may be used, provided that their total value does not exceed 20 % of the ex-works price of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex chapter 34 soap, organic surface-active agents, washing preparations, lubricating preparations, artificial waxes, prepared waxes, polishing or scouring preparations, candles and similar articles, modelling pastes, dental waxes and dental preparations with a basis of plaster, except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product. however, materials of the same heading as the product may be used, provided that their total value does not exceed 20 % of the ex-works price of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex 3404 artificial waxes and prepared waxes: with a basis of paraffin, petroleum waxes, waxes obtained from bituminous minerals, slack wax or scale wax manufacture from materials of any heading chapter 35 albuminoidal substances; modified starches; glues; enzymes manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product, in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product chapter 37 photographic or cinematographic goods manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product. however, materials of the same heading as the product may be used, provided that their total value does not exceed 20 % of the ex-works price of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex chapter 38 miscellaneous chemical products; except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product. however, materials of the same heading as the product may be used, provided that their total value does not exceed 20 % of the ex-works price of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex 3803 refined tall oil refining of crude tall oil or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex 3805 spirits of sulphate turpentine, purified purification by distillation or refining of raw spirits of sulphate turpentine or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 3806 30 ester gums manufacture from resin acids or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex 3807 wood pitch (wood tar pitch) distillation of wood tar or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 3809 10 finishing agents, dye carriers to accelerate the dyeing or fixing of dyestuffs and other products and preparations (for example, dressings and mordants), of a kind used in the textile, paper, leather or like industries, not elsewhere specified or included: with a basis of amylaceous substances manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 3823 industrial monocarboxylic fatty acids; acid oils from refining; industrial fatty alcohols manufacture from materials of any heading, including other materials of heading 3823 or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 3824 60 sorbitol other than that of sub-heading 2905 44 manufacture from materials of any sub-heading, except that of the product and except materials of sub-heading 2905 44 . however, materials of the same sub-heading as the product may be used, provided that their total value does not exceed 20 % of the exworks price of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex chapter 39 plastics and articles thereof; except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product. or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex 3907 copolymer, made from polycarbonate and acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene copolymer (abs) manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product. however, materials of the same heading as the product may be used, provided that their total value does not exceed 50 % of the ex-works price of the product (5) or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product polyester manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or manufacture from polycarbonate of tetrabromo-(bisphenol a) or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex 3920 ionomer sheet or film manufacture from a thermoplastic partial salt which is a copolymer of ethylene and metacrylic acid partly neutralised with metal ions, mainly zinc and sodium or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex 3921 foils of plastic, metallised manufacture from highly-transparent polyester-foils with a thickness of less than 23 micron (6) or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex chapter 40 rubber and articles thereof; except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 4012 retreaded or used pneumatic tyres of rubber; solid or cushion tyres, tyre treads and tyre flaps, of rubber: retreaded pneumatic, solid or cushion tyres, of rubber retreading of used tyres other manufacture from materials of any heading, except those of headings 4011 and 4012 or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex chapter 41 raw hides and skins (other than furskins) and leather; except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product 4101 to 4103 raw hides and skins of bovine (including buffalo) or equine animals (fresh, or salted, dried, limed, pickled or otherwise preserved, but not tanned, parchment dressed or further prepared), whether or not dehaired or split; raw skins of sheep or lambs (fresh, or salted, dried, limed, pickled or otherwise preserved, but not tanned, parchment dressed or further prepared), whether or not with wool on or split, other than those excluded by note 1(c) to chapter 41; other raw hides and skins (fresh, or salted, dried, limed, pickled or otherwise preserved, but not tanned, parchment dressed or further prepared), whether or not dehaired or split, other than those excluded by note 1(b) or 1(c) to chapter 41 manufacture from materials of any heading 4104 to 4106 tanned or crust hides and skins, without wool or hair on, whether or not split, but not further prepared re-tanning of tanned or pre-tanned hides and skins of sub-headings 4104 11 , 4104 19 , 4105 10 , 4106 21 , 4106 31 or 4106 91 , or manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product 4107 , 4112 , 4113 leather further prepared after tanning or crusting manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product. however, materials of sub-headings 4104 41 , 4104 49 , 4105 30 , 4106 22 , 4106 32 and 4106 92 may be used only if a re-tanning operation of the tanned or crust hides and skins in the dry state takes place chapter 42 articles of leather; saddlery and harness; travel goods, handbags and similar containers; articles of animal gut (other than silk worm gut) manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex chapter 43 furskins and artificial fur; manufactures thereof; except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 4301 raw furskins (including heads, tails, paws and other pieces or cuttings, suitable for furrier's use), other than raw hides and skins of heading 4101 , 4102 or 4103 manufacture from materials of any heading ex 4302 tanned or dressed furskins, assembled: plates, crosses and similar forms bleaching or dyeing, in addition to cutting and assembly of non-assembled tanned or dressed furskins other manufacture from non-assembled, tanned or dressed furskins 4303 articles of apparel, clothing accessories and other articles of furskin manufacture from non-assembled tanned or dressed furskins of heading 4302 ex chapter 44 wood and articles of wood; wood charcoal; except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex 4407 wood sawn or chipped lengthwise, sliced or peeled, of a thickness exceeding 6 mm, planed, sanded or end-jointed planing, sanding or end-jointing ex 4408 sheets for veneering (including those obtained by slicing laminated wood) and for plywood, of a thickness not exceeding 6 mm, spliced, and other wood sawn lengthwise, sliced or peeled of a thickness not exceeding 6 mm, planed, sanded or end-jointed splicing, planing, sanding or endjointing ex 4410 to ex 4413 beadings and mouldings, including moulded skirting and other moulded boards beading or moulding ex 4415 packing cases, boxes, crates, drums and similar packings, of wood manufacture from boards not cut to size ex 4418 builders' joinery and carpentry of wood manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product. however, cellular wood panels, shingles and shakes may be used beadings and mouldings beading or moulding ex 4421 match splints; wooden pegs or pins for footwear manufacture from wood of any heading, except drawn wood of heading 4409 ex chapter 51 wool, fine or coarse animal hair; horsehair yarn and woven fabric; except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product 5106 to 5110 yarn of wool, of fine or coarse animal hair or of horsehair spinning of natural fibres or extrusion of man-made fibres accompanied by spinning (7) 5111 to 5113 woven fabrics of wool, of fine or coarse animal hair or of horsehair: weaving (7) or printing accompanied by at least two preparatory or finishing operations (such as scouring, bleaching, mercerising, heat setting, raising, calendaring, shrink resistance processing, permanent finishing, decatising, impregnating, mending and burling) where the value of the unprinted fabric used does not exceed 47,5 % of the ex-works price of the product ex chapter 52 cotton; except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product 5204 to 5207 yarn and thread of cotton spinning of natural fibres or extrusion of man-made fibres accompanied by spinning (7) 5208 to 5212 woven fabrics of cotton: weaving (7) or printing accompanied by at least two preparatory or finishing operations (such as scouring, bleaching, mercerising, heat setting, raising, calendaring, shrink resistance processing, permanent finishing, decatising, impregnating, mending and burling) where the value of the unprinted fabric used does not exceed 47,5 % of the ex-works price of the product ex chapter 53 other vegetable textile fibres; paper yarn and woven fabrics of paper yarn; except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product 5306 to 5308 yarn of other vegetable textile fibres; paper yarn spinning of natural fibres or extrusion of man-made fibres accompanied by spinning (7) 5309 to 5311 woven fabrics of other vegetable textile fibres; woven fabrics of paper yarn: weaving (7) printing accompanied by at least two preparatory or finishing operations (such as scouring, bleaching, mercerising, heat setting, raising, calendaring, shrink resistance processing, permanent finishing, decatising, impregnating, mending and burling) where the value of the unprinted fabric used does not exceed 47,5 % of the ex-works price of the product 5401 to 5406 yarn, monofilament and thread of man-made filaments extrusion of man-made fibres accompanied by spinning or spinning of natural fibres (7) 5407 and 5408 woven fabrics of man-made filament yarn: weaving (7) or printing accompanied by at least two preparatory or finishing operations (such as scouring, bleaching, mercerising, heat setting, raising, calendaring, shrink resistance processing, permanent finishing, decatising, impregnating, mending and burling) where the value of the unprinted fabric used does not exceed 47,5 % of the ex-works price of the product 5501 to 5507 man-made staple fibres extrusion of man-made fibres 5508 to 5511 yarn and sewing thread of man-made staple fibres spinning of natural fibres or extrusion of man-made fibres accompanied by spinning (7) 5512 to 5516 woven fabrics of man-made staple fibres: weaving (7) or printing accompanied by at least two preparatory or finishing operations (such as scouring, bleaching, mercerising, heat setting, raising, calendaring, shrink resistance processing, permanent finishing, decatising, impregnating, mending and burling) where the value of the unprinted fabric used does not exceed 47,5 % of the ex-works price of the product ex chapter 56 wadding, felt and non-wovens; special yarns; twine, cordage, ropes and cables and articles thereof; except for: extrusion of man-made fibres accompanied by spinning or spinning of natural fibres or flocking accompanied by dyeing or printing (7) 5602 felt, whether or not impregnated, coated, covered or laminated: needleloom felt extrusion of man-made fibres accompanied by fabric formation, however: polypropylene filament of heading 5402 , polypropylene fibres of heading 5503 or 5506 , or polypropylene filament tow of heading 5501 , of which the denomination in all cases of a single filament or fibre is less than 9 decitex, may be used, provided that their total value does not exceed 40 % of the ex-works price of the product or fabric formation alone in the case of felt made from natural fibres (7) other extrusion of man-made fibres accompanied by fabric formation, or fabric formation alone in the case of other felt made from natural fibres (7) 5603 nonwovens, whether or not impregnated, coated, covered or laminated any non-woven process including needle punching 5604 rubber thread and cord, textile covered; textile yarn, and strip and the like of heading 5404 or 5405 , impregnated, coated, covered or sheathed with rubber or plastics: rubber thread and cord, textile covered manufacture from rubber thread or cord, not textile covered other extrusion of man-made fibres accompanied by spinning or spinning of natural fibres (7) 5605 metallised yarn, whether or not gimped, being textile yarn, or strip or the like of heading 5404 or 5405 , combined with metal in the form of thread, strip or powder or covered with metal extrusion of man-made fibres accompanied by spinning or spinning of natural and/or man-made staple fibres (7) 5606 gimped yarn, and strip and the like of heading 5404 or 5405 , gimped (other than those of heading 5605 and gimped horsehair yarn); chenille yarn (including flock chenille yarn); loop wale-yarn extrusion of man-made fibres accompanied by spinning or spinning of natural and/or man-made staple fibres or spinning accompanied with flocking or flocking accompanied by dyeing (7) chapter 57 carpets and other textile floor coverings: spinning of natural and/or man-made staple fibres or extrusion of man-made filament yarn, in each case accompanied by weaving or manufacture from coir yarn or sisal yarn or jute yarn or flocking accompanied by dyeing or by printing or tufting accompanied by dyeing or by printing extrusion of man-made fibres accompanied by non-woven techniques including needle punching (7) however: polypropylene filament of heading 5402 , polypropylene fibres of heading 5503 or 5506 , or polypropylene filament tow of heading 5501 , of which the denomination in all cases of a single filament or fibre is less than 9 decitex, may be used, provided that their total value does not exceed 40 % of the ex-works price of the product jute fabric may be used as a backing ex chapter 58 special woven fabrics; tufted textile fabrics; lace; tapestries; trimmings; embroidery; except for: weaving (7) or printing accompanied by at least two preparatory or finishing operations (such as scouring, bleaching, mercerising, heat setting, raising, calendaring, shrink resistance processing, permanent finishing, decatising, impregnating, mending and burling) where the value of the unprinted fabric used does not exceed 47,5 % of the ex-works price of the product 5805 hand-woven tapestries of the types gobelins, flanders, aubusson, beauvais and the like, and needle-worked tapestries (for example, petit point, cross stitch), whether or not made up manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product 5810 embroidery in the piece, in strips or in motifs manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 50 % of the ex-works price of the product 5901 textile fabrics coated with gum or amylaceous substances, of a kind used for the outer covers of books or the like; tracing cloth; prepared painting canvas; buckram and similar stiffened textile fabrics of a kind used for hat foundations weaving accompanied by dyeing or by flocking or by coating or flocking accompanied by dyeing or printing 5902 tyre cord fabric of high tenacity yarn of nylon or other polyamides, polyesters or viscose rayon: containing not more than 90 % by weight of textile materials weaving other extrusion of man-made fibres accompanied by weaving 5903 textile fabrics impregnated, coated, covered or laminated with plastics, other than those of heading 5902 weaving accompanied by dyeing or by coating or printing accompanied by at least two preparatory or finishing operations (such as scouring, bleaching, mercerising, heat setting, raising, calendering, shrink resistance processing, permanent finishing, decatising, impregnating, mending and burling), provided that the value of the unprinted fabric used does not exceed 47,5 % of the ex-works price of the product 5904 linoleum, whether or not cut to shape; floor coverings consisting of a coating or covering applied on a textile backing, whether or not cut to shape weaving accompanied by dyeing or by coating (7) 5905 textile wall coverings: impregnated, coated, covered or laminated with rubber, plastics or other materials weaving accompanied by dyeing or by coating other spinning of natural and/or man-made staple fibres or extrusion of man-made filament yarn, in each case accompanied by weaving or weaving accompanied by dyeing or by coating or printing accompanied by at least two preparatory or finishing operations (such as scouring, bleaching, mercerising, heat setting, raising, calendering, shrink resistance processing, permanent finishing, decatising, impregnating, mending and burling), provided that the value of the unprinted fabric used does not exceed 47,5 % of the ex-works price of the product (7): 5906 rubberised textile fabrics, other than those of heading 5902 : knitted or crocheted fabrics spinning of natural and/or man-made staple fibres or extrusion of man-made filament yarn, in each case accompanied by knitting or knitting accompanied by dyeing or by coating or dyeing of yarn of natural fibres accompanied by knitting (7) other fabrics made of synthetic filament yarn, containing more than 90 % by weight of textile materials extrusion of man-made fibres accompanied by weaving other weaving accompanied by dyeing or by coating or dyeing of yarn of natural fibres accompanied by weaving 5907 textile fabrics otherwise impregnated, coated or covered; painted canvas being theatrical scenery, studio back-cloths or the like weaving accompanied by dyeing or by flocking or by coating or flocking accompanied by dyeing or by printing or printing accompanied by at least two preparatory or finishing operations (such as scouring, bleaching, mercerising, heat setting, raising, calendering, shrink resistance processing, permanent finishing, decatising, impregnating, mending and burling), provided that the value of the unprinted fabric used does not exceed 47,5 % of the ex-works price of the product 5908 textile wicks, woven, plaited or knitted, for lamps, stoves, lighters, candles or the like; incandescent gas mantles and tubular knitted gas mantle fabric therefor, whether or not impregnated: incandescent gas mantles, impregnated manufacture from tubular knitted gas-mantle fabric other manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product 5909 to 5911 textile articles of a kind suitable for industrial use: polishing discs or rings other than of felt of heading 5911 weaving woven fabrics, of a kind commonly used in papermaking or other technical uses, felted or not, whether or not impregnated or coated, tubular or endless with single or multiple warp and/or weft, or flat woven with multiple warp and/or weft of heading 5911 weaving (7) other extrusion of man-made filament yarn or spinning of natural or man-made staple fibres, accompanied by weaving (7) or weaving accompanied by dyeing or coating chapter 60 knitted or crocheted fabrics spinning of natural and/or man-made staple fibres or extrusion of man-made filament yarn, in each case accompanied by knitting or knitting accompanied by dyeing or by flocking or by coating or flocking accompanied by dyeing or by printing or dyeing of yarn of natural fibres accompanied by knitting or twisting or texturing accompanied by knitting provided that the value of the non-twisted/non-textured yarns used does not exceed 47,5 % of the ex-works price of the product chapter 61 articles of apparel and clothing accessories, knitted or crocheted: obtained by sewing together or otherwise assembling, two or more pieces of knitted or crocheted fabric which have been either cut to form or obtained directly to form manufacture from fabric other spinning of natural and/or man-made staple fibres or extrusion of man-made filament yarn, in each case accompanied by knitting (knitted to shape products) or dyeing of yarn of natural fibres accompanied by knitting (knitted to shape products) (7) ex chapter 62 articles of apparel and clothing accessories, not knitted or crocheted; except for: manufacture from fabric 6213 and 6214 handkerchiefs, shawls, scarves, mufflers, mantillas, veils and the like: embroidered weaving accompanied by making-up (including cutting) or manufacture from unembroidered fabric, provided that the value of the unembroidered fabric used does not exceed 40 % of the ex-works price of the product (8) or making-up preceded by printing accompanied by at least two preparatory or finishing operations (such as scouring, bleaching, mercerising, heat setting, raising, calendering, shrink resistance processing, permanent finishing, decatising, impregnating, mending and burling), provided that the value of the unprinted fabric used does not exceed 47,5 % of the ex-works price of the product (7) (8) other weaving accompanied by making-up (including cutting) or making-up followed by printing accompanied by at least two preparatory finishing operations (such as scouring, bleaching, mercerising, heat setting, raising, calendering, shrink resistance processing, permanent finishing, decatising, impregnating, mending and burling), provided that the value of the unprinted fabric used does not exceed 47,5 % of the ex-works price of the product (7) (8) 6217 other made up clothing accessories; parts of garments or of clothing accessories, other than those of heading 6212 : embroidered weaving accompanied by making-up (including cutting) or manufacture from unembroidered fabric, provided that the value of the unembroidered fabric used does not exceed 40 % of the ex-works price of the product (8) fire-resistant equipment of fabric covered with foil of aluminised polyester weaving accompanied by making-up (including cutting) or coating provided that the value of the uncoated fabric used does not exceed 40 % of the ex-works price of the product accompanied by making-up (including cutting) (8) interlinings for collars and cuffs, cut out manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product, and in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 40 % of the ex-works price of the product ex chapter 63 other made-up textile articles; sets; worn clothing and worn textile articles; rags; except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product 6301 to 6304 blankets, travelling rugs, bed linen etc.; curtains etc.; other furnishing articles: of felt, of nonwovens any non-woven process including needle punching accompanied by making up (including cutting) other: embroidered weaving or knitting accompanied by making-up (including cutting) or manufacture from unembroidered fabric, provided that the value of the unembroidered fabric used does not exceed 40 % of the ex-works price of the product (8) (9) other weaving or knitting accompanied by making-up (including cutting) 6305 sacks and bags, of a kind used for the packing of goods weaving or knitting and making-up (including cutting) (7) 6306 tarpaulins, awnings and sun blinds; tents; sails for boats, sailboards or landcraft; camping goods: of nonwovens any non-woven process including needle punching accompanied by making up (including cutting) other weaving accompanied by making-up (including cutting) (7) (8) or coating provided that the value of the uncoated fabric used does not exceed 40 % of the ex-works price of the product accompanied by making-up (including cutting) 6307 other made-up articles, including dress patterns manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 40 % of the ex-works price of the product 6308 sets consisting of woven fabric and yarn, whether or not with accessories, for making up into rugs, tapestries, embroidered table cloths or serviettes, or similar textile articles, put up in packings for retail sale each item in the set must satisfy the rule which would apply to it if it were not included in the set. however, non-originating articles may be incorporated, provided that their total value does not exceed 25 % of the ex-works price of the set ex chapter 64 footwear, gaiters and the like; parts of such articles; except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except from assemblies of uppers affixed to inner soles or to other sole components of heading 6406 6406 parts of footwear (including uppers whether or not attached to soles other than outer soles); removable in-soles, heel cushions and similar articles; gaiters, leggings and similar articles, and parts thereof manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product chapter 65 headgear and parts thereof manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product ex chapter 68 articles of stone, plaster, cement, asbestos, mica or similar materials, except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex 6803 articles of slate or of agglomerated slate manufacture from worked slate ex 6812 articles of asbestos; articles of mixtures with a basis of asbestos or of mixtures with a basis of asbestos and magnesium carbonate manufacture from materials of any heading ex 6814 articles of mica, including agglomerated or reconstituted mica, on a support of paper, paperboard or other materials manufacture from worked mica (including agglomerated or reconstituted mica) chapter 69 ceramic products manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex chapter 70 glass and glassware, except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 7006 glass of heading 7003 , 7004 or 7005 ,bent, edge-worked, engraved, drilled, glass-plate substrates, coated with a dielectric thin film, and of a semiconductor grade in accordance with semii-standards (10) manufacture from non-coated glass-plate substrate of heading 7006 other manufacture from materials of heading 7001 7010 carboys, bottles, flasks, jars, pots, phials, ampoules and other containers, of glass, of a kind used for the conveyance or packing of goods; preserving jars of glass; stoppers, lids and other closures, of glass manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or cutting of glassware, provided that the total value of the uncut glassware used does not exceed 50 % of the ex-works price of the product 7013 glassware of a kind used for table, kitchen, toilet, office, indoor decoration or similar purposes (other than that of heading 7010 or 7018 ) manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or cutting of glassware, provided that the total value of the uncut glassware used does not exceed 50 % of the ex-works price of the product or hand-decoration (except silk-screen printing) of hand-blown glassware, provided that the total value of the hand-blown glassware used does not exceed 50 % of the ex-works price of the product ex 7019 articles (other than yarn) of glass fibres manufacture from: uncoloured slivers, rovings, yarn or chopped strands, or glass wool ex chapter 71 natural or cultured pearls, precious or semi-precious stones, precious metals, metals clad with precious metal, and articles thereof; imitation jewellery; coin, except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 7106 , 7108 and 7110 precious metals: unwrought manufacture from materials of any heading, except those of headings 7106 , 7108 and 7110 or electrolytic, thermal or chemical separation of precious metals of heading 7106 , 7108 or 7110 or fusion and/or alloying of precious metals of heading 7106 , 7108 or 7110 with each other or with base metals semi-manufactured or in powder form manufacture from unwrought precious metals ex 7107 , ex 7109 and ex 7111 metals clad with precious metals, semi-manufactured manufacture from metals clad with precious metals, unwrought 7115 other articles of precious metal or of metal clad with precious metal manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product 7117 imitation jewellery manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or manufacture from base metal parts, not plated or covered with precious metals, provided that the value of all the materials used does not exceed 50 % of the ex-works price of the product ex chapter 73 articles of iron or steel; except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product ex 7301 sheet piling manufacture from materials of heading 7207 7302 railway or tramway track construction material of iron or steel, the following: rails, check-rails and rack rails, switch blades, crossing frogs, point rods and other crossing pieces, sleepers (cross-ties), fish-plates, chairs, chair wedges, sole pates (base plates), rail clips, bedplates, ties and other material specialised for jointing or fixing rails manufacture from materials of heading 7206 7304 , 7305 and 7306 tubes, pipes and hollow profiles, of iron (other than cast iron) or steel manufacture from materials of heading 7206 , 7207 , 7208 , 7209 , 7210 , 7211 , 7212 , 7218 , 7219 , 7220 or 7224 ex 7307 tube or pipe fittings of stainless steel turning, drilling, reaming, threading, deburring and sandblasting of forged blanks, provided that the total value of the forged blanks used does not exceed 35 % of the ex-works price of the product 7308 structures (excluding prefabricated buildings of heading 9406 ) and parts of structures (for example, bridges and bridge-sections, lock-gates, towers, lattice masts, roofs, roofing frameworks, doors and windows and their frames and thresholds for doors, shutters, balustrades, pillars and columns), of iron or steel; plates, rods, angles, shapes, sections, tubes and the like, prepared for use in structures, of iron or steel manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product. however, welded angles, shapes and sections of heading 7301 may not be used ex 7315 skid chain manufacture in which the value of all the materials of heading 7315 used does not exceed 50 % of the ex-works price of the product ex chapter 74 copper and articles thereof; except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product 7403 refined copper and copper alloys, unwrought manufacture from materials of any heading ex chapter 76 aluminium and articles thereof; except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product 7601 unwrought aluminium manufacture from materials of any heading 7607 aluminium foil (whether or not printed or backed with paper, paperboard, plastics or similar backing materials) of a thickness (excluding any backing) not exceeding 0,2 mm manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product and heading 7606 ex chapter 78 lead and articles thereof, except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product 7801 unwrought lead: refined lead manufacture from materials of any heading other manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product. however, waste and scrap of heading 7802 may not be used chapter 80 tin and articles thereof manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product ex chapter 82 tools, implements, cutlery, spoons and forks, of base metal; parts thereof of base metal; except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 8206 tools of two or more of the headings 8202 to 8205 , put up in sets for retail sale manufacture from materials of any heading, except those of headings 8202 to 8205 . however, tools of headings 8202 to 8205 may be incorporated into the set, provided that their total value does not exceed 15 % of the ex-works price of the set 8211 knives with cutting blades, serrated or not (including pruning knives), other than knives of heading 8208 , and blades therefor manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product. however, knife blades and handles of base metal may be used 8214 other articles of cutlery (for example; hair clippers, butchers' or kitchen cleavers, choppers and mincing knives, paper knives); manicure or pedicure sets and instruments (including nail files) manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product. however, handles of base metal may be used 8215 spoons, forks, ladles, skimmers, cake-servers, fish-knives, butter-knives, sugar tongs and similar kitchen or tableware manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product. however, handles of base metal may be used ex chapter 83 miscellaneous articles of base metal; except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex 8302 other mountings, fittings and similar articles suitable for buildings, and automatic door closers manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product. however, other materials of heading 8302 may be used, provided that their total value does not exceed 20 % of the ex-works price of the product ex 8306 statuettes and other ornaments, of base metal manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product. however, other materials of heading 8306 may be used, provided that their total value does not exceed 30 % of the ex-works price of the product ex chapter 84 nuclear reactors, boilers, machinery and mechanical appliances; parts thereof; except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 8401 nuclear reactors; fuel elements (cartridges), non-irradiated, for nuclear reactors; machinery and apparatus for isotopic separation manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 8407 spark-ignition reciprocating or rotary internal combustion piston engines manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 8408 compression-ignition internal combustion piston engines (diesel or semi-diesel engines manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 8427 fork-lift trucks; other works trucks fitted with lifting or handling equipment manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 8482 ball or roller bearings manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex chapter 85 electrical machinery and equipment and parts thereof; sound recorders and reproducers, television image and sound recorders and reproducers, and parts and accessories of such articles; except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 8501 , 8502 electric motors and generators; electric generating sets and rotary converters manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product and of heading 8503 or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 8513 portable electric lamps designed to function by their own source of energy (for example, dry batteries, accumulators, magnetos), other than lighting equipment of heading 8512 manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 8519 sound recording and sound reproducing apparatus manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product and of heading 8522 or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 8521 video recording or reproducing apparatus, whether or not incorporating a video tuner manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product and of heading 8522 or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 8523 prepared unrecorded media for sound recording or similar recording of other phenomena, other than products of chapter 37 manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 8525 transmission apparatus for radio-broadcasting or television, whether or not incorporating reception apparatus or sound recording or reproducing apparatus; television cameras, digital cameras and other video camera recorders manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product and of heading 8529 or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 8526 radar apparatus, radio navigational aid apparatus and radio remote control apparatus manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product and of heading 8529 or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 8527 reception apparatus for radio-broadcasting, whether or not combined, in the same housing, with sound recording or reproducing apparatus or a clock manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product and of heading 8529 or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 8528 monitors and projectors, not incorporating television reception apparatus; reception apparatus for television, whether or not incorporating radio-broadcast receivers or sound or video recording or reproducing apparatus manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product and of heading 8529 or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 8535 to 8537 electrical apparatus for switching or protecting electrical circuits, or for making connections to or in electrical circuits; connectors for optical fibres, optical fibre bundles or cables; boards, panels, consoles, desks, cabinets and other bases, for electric control or the distribution of electricity manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product and of heading 8538 or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 8540 11 and 8540 12 cathode ray television picture tubes, including video monitor cathode ray tubes manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex 8542 31 to ex 8542 33 and ex 8542 39 monolithic integrated circuits manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 50 % of the ex-works price of the product or the operation of diffusion, in which integrated circuits are formed on a semi-conductor substrate by the selective introduction of an appropriate dopant, whether or not assembled and/or tested in a non-party 8544 insulated (including enamelled or anodised) wire, cable (including coaxial cable) and other insulated electric conductors, whether or not fitted with connectors; optical fibre cables, made up of individually sheathed fibres, whether or not assembled with electric conductors or fitted with connectors manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 8545 carbon electrodes, carbon brushes, lamp carbons, battery carbons and other articles of graphite or other carbon, with or without metal, of a kind used for electrical purposes manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 8546 electrical insulators of any material manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 8547 insulating fittings for electrical machines, appliances or equipment, being fittings wholly of insulating materials apart from any minor components of metal (for example, threaded sockets) incorporated during moulding solely for purposes of assembly, other than insulators of heading 8546 ; electrical conduit tubing and joints therefor, of base metal lined with insulating material manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 8548 waste and scrap of primary cells, primary batteries and electric accumulators; spent primary cells, spent primary batteries and spent electric accumulators; electrical parts of machinery or apparatus, not specified or included elsewhere in this chapter manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product chapter 86 railway or tramway locomotives, rolling-stock and parts thereof; railway or tramway track fixtures and fittings and parts thereof; mechanical (including electro-mechanical) traffic signalling equipment of all kinds. manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex chapter 87 vehicles other than railway or tramway rolling-stock, and parts and accessories thereof; except for: manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 8711 motorcycles (including mopeds) and cycles fitted with an auxiliary motor, with or without side-cars; side-cars manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex chapter 90 optical, photographic, cinematographic, measuring, checking, precision, medical or surgical instruments and apparatus; parts and accessories thereof, except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 9002 lenses, prisms, mirrors and other optical elements, of any material, mounted, being parts of or fittings for instruments or apparatus, other than such elements of glass not optically worked manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 9033 parts and accessories (not specified or included elsewhere in this chapter) for machines, appliances, instruments or apparatus of chapter 90 manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product chapter 91 clocks and watches and parts thereof manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product chapter 94 furniture; bedding, mattresses, mattress supports, cushions and similar stuffed furnishings; lamps and lighting fittings, not elsewhere specified or included; illuminated signs, illuminated name-plates and the like; prefabricated buildings manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex chapter 95 toys, games and sports requisites; parts and accessories thereof, except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product ex 9506 golf clubs and parts thereof manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product. however, roughly-shaped blocks for making golf-club heads may be used ex chapter 96 miscellaneous manufactured articles, except for: manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product or manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 9601 and 9602 worked ivory, bone, tortoiseshell, horn, antlers, coral, mother-of-pearl and other animal carving material, and articles of these materials (including articles obtained by moulding. worked vegetable or mineral carving material and articles of these materials; moulded or carved articles of wax, of stearin, of natural gums or natural resins or of modelling pastes, and other moulded or carved articles, not elsewhere specified or included; worked, unhardened gelatine (except gelatine of heading 3503 ) and articles of unhardened gelatin manufacture from materials of any heading 9603 brooms, brushes (including brushes constituting parts of machines, appliances or vehicles), hand-operated mechanical floor sweepers, not motorized, mops and feather dusters; prepared knots and tufts for broom or brush making; paint pads and rollers, squeegees (other than roller squeegees) manufacture in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 9605 travel sets for personal toilet, sewing or shoe or clothes cleaning each item in the set must satisfy the rule which would apply to it if it were not included in the set. however, non-originating articles may be incorporated, provided that their total value does not exceed 15 % of the ex-works price of the set 9606 buttons, press-fasteners, snap-fasteners and press-studs, button moulds and other parts of these articles; button blanks manufacture: from materials of any heading, except that of the product, and in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 9608 ball-point pens; felt-tipped and other porous-tipped pens and markers; fountain pens, stylograph pens and other pens; duplicating stylos; propelling or sliding pencils; pen-holders, pencilholders and similar holders; parts (including caps and clips) of the foregoing articles, other than those of heading 9609 manufacture from materials of any heading, except that of the product. however, nibs or nib-points of the same heading as the product may be used 9612 typewriter or similar ribbons, inked or otherwise prepared for giving impressions, whether or not on spools or in cartridges; ink-pads, whether or not inked, with or without boxes manufacture: from materials of any heading, except that of the product, and in which the value of all the materials used does not exceed 70 % of the ex-works price of the product 9613 20 pocket lighters, gas fuelled, refillable manufacture in which the total value of the materials of heading 9613 used does not exceed 30 % of the ex-works price of the product 9614 smoking pipes (including pipe bowls) and cigar or cigarette holders, and parts thereof manufacture from materials of any heading (1) decision no 1/2006 of the eu-jordan association council of 15 june 2006 amending protocol 3 to the euro-mediterranean agreement, concerning the definition of the concept of originating products and methods of administrative cooperation (oj l 209, 31.7.2006, p. 30). (2) for the special conditions relating to specific processes , see introductory notes 7.1 and 7.3. (3) for the special conditions relating to specific processes , see introductory note 7.2. (4) a group is regarded as any part of the heading separated from the rest by a semi-colon. (5) in the case of the products composed of materials classified within both headings 3901 to 3906, on the one hand, and within headings 3907 to 3911, on the other hand, this restriction only applies to that group of materials which predominates by weight in the product. (6) the following foils shall be considered as highly transparent: foils, the optical dimming of which, measured according to astm-d 1003-16 by gardner hazemeter (i.e. hazefactor), is less than 2 %. (7) for special conditions relating to products made of a mixture of textile materials, see introductory note 5. (8) see introductory note 6. (9) for knitted or crocheted articles, not elastic or rubberised, obtained by sewing or assembling pieces of knitted or crocheted fabrics (cut out or knitted directly to shape), see introductory note 6. (10) semii semiconductor equipment and materials institute incorporated

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/21 of 14 december 2018 adopting the twelfth update of the list of sites of community importance for the boreal biogeographical region (notified under document c(2018) 8533) type: decision_impl subject matter: environmental policy; europe; natural environment date published: 2019-01-09 9.1.2019 en official journal of the european union l 7/367 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/21 of 14 december 2018 adopting the twelfth update of the list of sites of community importance for the boreal biogeographical region (notified under document c(2018) 8533) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to council directive 92/43/eec of 21 may 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of article 4(2) thereof, whereas: (1) the boreal biogeographical region referred to in article 1(c)(iii) of directive 92/43/eec comprises parts of the union territories of finland and sweden and the union territories of estonia, latvia and lithuania, as specified in the biogeographical map approved on 20 april 2005 by the committee set up by article 20 of that directive (the habitats committee). (2) the initial list of sites of community importance for the boreal biogeographical region, within the meaning of directive 92/43/eec, was adopted by commission decision 2005/101/ec (2). that list was last updated by commission implementing decision (eu) 2018/41 (3). (3) the sites included in the list of sites of community importance for the boreal biogeographical region form part of the natura 2000 network which is an essential element of the protection of biodiversity in the union. in order to make further progress in the actual establishment of the natura 2000 network and in the context of a dynamic adaptation of that network, the lists of sites of community importance are reviewed regularly. (4) between 19 june 2017 and 2 march 2018 member states have proposed additional sites of community importance for the boreal biogeographical region within the meaning of article 1 of directive 92/43/eec. member states have also submitted changes in the site-related information contained in the list of sites of community importance for the boreal biogeographical region. (5) on the basis of the draft list drawn up by the commission in agreement with each of the member states concerned, which also identifies sites hosting priority natural habitat types or priority species, an updated list of sites selected as sites of community importance for the boreal biogeographical region should be adopted. articles 4(4) and 6 of directive 92/43/eec apply to the newly included sites. (6) knowledge of the existence and distribution of the natural habitat types and species is constantly evolving as a result of the surveillance undertaken in accordance with article 11 of directive 92/43/eec. therefore, the evaluation and selection of sites at union level was carried out using the best available information at the time. (7) certain member states have not proposed sufficient sites to meet the requirements of directive 92/43/eec for certain habitat types and species. furthermore, knowledge of the existence and distribution of some of the natural habitat types listed in annex i and some of the species listed in annex ii to directive 92/43/eec remains incomplete. for those habitat types and species it can therefore not be concluded that the natura 2000 network is complete. (8) in the interests of clarity and transparency, implementing decision (eu) 2018/41 should be repealed. (9) the measures provided for in this decision are in accordance with the opinion of the habitats committee, has adopted this decision: article 1 the twelfth update of the list of sites of community importance for the boreal biogeographical region as set out in the annex is adopted. article 2 implementing decision (eu) 2018/41 is repealed. article 3 this decision is addressed to the member states. done at brussels, 14 december 2018. for the commission karmenu vella member of the commission (1) oj l 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7. (2) commission decision 2005/101/ec of 13 january 2005 adopting, pursuant to council directive 92/43/eec, the list of sites of community importance for the boreal biogeographical region (oj l 40, 11.2.2005, p. 1). (3) commission implementing decision (eu) 2018/41 of 12 december 2017 adopting the eleventh update of the list of sites of community importance for the boreal biogeographical region (oj l 15, 19.1.2018, p. 199). annex twelfth update of the list of sites of community importance for the boreal biogeographical region each site of community importance (sci) is identified by the information supplied in the natura 2000 format, including the corresponding map. this information has been transmitted by the competent national authorities in accordance with the second subparagraph of article 4(1) of directive 92/43/eec. the table below gives the following information: a : sci code comprising nine characters, the first two being the iso code for the member state; b : name of sci; c : * = presence on the sci of at least one priority natural habitat type and/or species within the meaning of article 1 of directive 92/43/eec; d : area of sci in hectares or length of sci in km; e : geographical coordinates of sci (latitude and longitude) in decimal degrees. all the information given in the union list below is based on the data proposed, transmitted and validated by estonia, latvia, lithuania, finland and sweden. a b c d e sci code name of sci * area of sci (ha) length of sci (km) geographical coordinates of sci longitude latitude ee0010101 tuhala * 189,1 24,9606 59,202 ee0010102 parasp llu * 479,1 25,1041 59,2995 ee0010103 k mbla * 164 25,0124 59,2177 ee0010104 paunk la * 622,7 25,284 59,1407 ee0010105 tammiku * 381,3 24,9107 59,2165 ee0010106 p hja-k rvemaa * 13 494,5 25,6933 59,3791 ee0010107 alema * 60,2 24,3348 59,0871 ee0010108 laukesoo * 2 726,1 25,309 59,0376 ee0010109 anija * 72,2 25,2767 59,372 ee0010110 kiviloo 25,7 25,2389 59,303 ee0010111 parila * 208,3 25,2423 59,326 ee0010112 ardu * 42,5 25,3275 59,0988 ee0010113 maapaju * 450,9 25,5173 59,3206 ee0010114 kostivere * 111,7 25,1153 59,4357 ee0010116 lgase * 49,6 25,0935 59,4852 ee0010120 pirita * 691,9 24,8734 59,4653 ee0010121 valgej rve * 723,3 24,1353 59,1116 ee0010122 laulasmaa * 130,4 24,2456 59,387 ee0010123 t risalu * 165,5 24,2937 59,4042 ee0010124 ruila * 830,6 24,4216 59,1629 ee0010125 v na * 858 24,3725 59,3838 ee0010126 prangli * 1 318,8 25,0042 59,6233 ee0010127 naissaare * 1 892,9 24,5182 59,566 ee0010129 pakri * 20 574,8 24,0443 59,3478 ee0010132 rannam isa * 66,4 24,5331 59,4384 ee0010133 orkj rve * 1170 24,2416 59,1432 ee0010136 p metsa * 31,3 25,0988 59,4075 ee0010137 niitv lja 25 24,3791 59,3102 ee0010138 naage * 4,6 24,359 59,4075 ee0010140 suurupi * 191,6 24,3611 59,4579 ee0010141 kiruvere 21,1 25,336 59,1257 ee0010142 muraste * 141,3 24,4392 59,4664 ee0010143 rahum e 24 24,6943 59,3942 ee0010144 pakasj rve 18,5 25,8215 59,3152 ee0010148 kuivaj e * 1,1 25,0946 59,2042 ee0010150 j gala 29,4 25,1631 59,4635 ee0010152 ubari * 58,7 25,2935 59,4912 ee0010153 aegviidu * 1,1 25,6577 59,2885 ee0010154 krassi 80,3 23,7739 59,3442 ee0010155 vasalemma 15,3 24,1753 59,3032 ee0010156 valgej e 30,1 25,8118 59,3855 ee0010171 kolga lahe * 2 449,1 25,2921 59,5613 ee0010173 lahemaa * 74784 25,8047 59,5735 ee0010175 v na-posti * 58,5 24,5024 59,3672 ee0010176 vansi * 140,8 24,3447 59,2168 ee0010177 kaberla * 52,6 25,2832 59,4701 ee0010184 pedase * 13,6 23,9019 59,2658 ee0010187 v na j e 28,9 24,3946 59,4116 ee0010188 aegna saare * 302,8 24,7597 59,5812 ee0010190 valkla klindi * 5,1 25,3585 59,4782 ee0010191 v na-viti 16 24,3808 59,4398 ee0010192 suure-aru * 702,6 24,3997 59,2341 ee0020205 ohepalu * 5 934,6 25,9345 59,3592 ee0020301 maidla-igan mme * 332,9 24,2103 58,9379 ee0020302 kohatu * 975 24,2834 58,9944 ee0020303 angasilla * 293,8 24,2647 58,9004 ee0020304 paek la * 265,3 24,3118 58,8858 ee0020305 pilkuse * 486 24,256 58,8008 ee0020306 konuvere * 479,9 24,3596 58,7805 ee0020307 selja-p dra * 1 664,2 24,5014 58,7313 ee0020311 pajaka-vardi * 318 24,3983 59,0467 ee0020312 linnuraba * 3 393,6 24,5956 59,0645 ee0020313 jalase * 2 743,2 24,6009 58,9754 ee0020314 salavalge-t rasoo * 4 535,1 3,6 24,7081 58,8322 ee0020315 taarik nnu * 2 857,4 24,878 58,6979 ee0020316 rabivere * 2 169,1 24,7289 59,1149 ee0020317 l mandu * 106,9 24,5718 59,1718 ee0020318 kurtna-vilivere * 71,1 24,7081 59,2083 ee0020319 rahaaugu * 473,1 24,8109 59,204 ee0020321 ridak la * 143,4 24,8534 59,0167 ee0020322 raikk la-paka * 138,9 24,7479 58,9436 ee0020324 mahtra * 7 609,9 25,0008 59,1077 ee0020325 k nnumaa * 11 397,1 25,0891 58,9542 ee0020326 tillniidu * 347,2 25,0387 58,826 ee0020327 mukri * 2 212,5 24,9938 58,7366 ee0020328 linnum ngu * 2 089,3 25,1627 58,7464 ee0020329 piiumetsa * 1 135,8 25,2532 58,9005 ee0020330 pae * 33,1 24,917 58,9969 ee0020331 sonni * 12,8 25,1481 58,9037 ee0020332 sulu * 263,6 24,5081 58,8303 ee0020333 karitsu 50,9 25,0099 58,9943 ee0020334 nurtuj e * 35,2 24,585 58,7719 ee0020335 kastna-rapla * 841,6 25,0691 58,8667 ee0020336 kuusiku * 120,9 24,6894 58,9518 ee0020337 n lvasoo * 1 106,2 24,8597 58,7675 ee0020338 avaste * 8 494,6 24,2285 58,6783 ee0020342 urevere * 17,7 24,2712 58,8336 ee0020408 m rjamaa j rtade * 113,8 24,4611 58,9008 ee0020409 rangu * 831,3 24,3945 58,9505 ee0020410 rahula-napanurga * 214,9 24,3621 59,0523 ee0020411 vardi * 682,2 24,4561 59,0079 ee0040002 v inamere * 253 958,9 23,2127 58,802 ee0040111 p drapao * 2,5 22,6211 58,9503 ee0040112 paope * 2 243,2 22,4336 58,9739 ee0040113 vanam isa * 1540 22,4755 58,7326 ee0040114 tilga * 101,9 22,6151 58,7224 ee0040115 undama soo * 81,9 22,8627 58,8957 ee0040116 pihla-kaibaldi * 3780 22,674 58,9359 ee0040117 sepaste * 36,7 22,5193 58,7196 ee0040118 luidja * 67,9 22,4058 58,9397 ee0040119 leigri * 461,1 22,582 58,8929 ee0040120 tihu * 1 422,3 22,5075 58,87 ee0040121 paope loo * 158,7 22,4356 58,9437 ee0040122 k rgessaare-mudaste * 2 900,1 22,4959 59,0126 ee0040123 pihla-kurisu * 276,9 22,5446 58,9727 ee0040124 tareste * 454,9 22,7041 59,0172 ee0040125 vilivalla * 15,7 22,8245 58,9078 ee0040126 kuri-hellamaa * 57,1 22,9194 58,9477 ee0040127 p halepa * 44 22,9589 58,8918 ee0040128 kukka-luhastu * 256,1 22,8655 58,967 ee0040129 hiiu madala 4508 22,2819 59,0426 ee0040131 viilupi * 30,6 22,9184 58,8713 ee0040133 tahkuna * 1 878,7 22,6356 59,0582 ee0040134 jausa * 39,4 22,6894 58,7853 ee0040135 k pu * 3 654,2 22,2197 58,9197 ee0040136 h ti * 31,2 22,4743 58,9132 ee0040141 klaasrahu 2 688,4 22,3854 58,7891 ee0040201 n va-osmussaare * 24745 23,4932 59,1977 ee0040202 suursoo-leidissoo * 22629 23,8456 59,131 ee0040203 marimetsa- mma * 7 868,1 24,0383 58,9491 ee0040204 ehmja-turvalepa * 2 418,1 23,776 58,903 ee0040205 kuke-kiili * 888,8 23,5685 58,6597 ee0040206 poanse * 312,4 23,6784 58,6715 ee0040207 karuse-linnuse * 413,3 23,6961 58,6221 ee0040209 k ntu-kastja * 3 142,2 24,0982 58,7619 ee0040210 luiste * 1 079,9 24,1783 58,8733 ee0040211 laik la * 1 097,5 23,9939 58,8002 ee0040212 mustj rve raba * 1 086,1 24,1116 59,0615 ee0040213 lihula * 6 753,8 23,9422 58,6589 ee0040214 tuhu * 4 048,3 23,8538 58,5746 ee0040215 einbi * 8,7 23,4692 58,9969 ee0040301 allikukivi * 16,6 25,0079 58,1553 ee0040302 metsa re * 159,7 24,7041 58,2886 ee0040303 j rveotsa * 27,2 24,9879 58,0473 ee0040305 kabli * 737 24,4222 58,0108 ee0040306 kaisma * 3 171,7 24,6892 58,706 ee0040307 mihkli * 88,9 24,1144 58,6217 ee0040308 kalita * 146,1 24,85 58,0693 ee0040309 laulaste * 1066 24,5372 57,9779 ee0040310 kanak la * 55,8 25,1838 58,2749 ee0040311 karin mme * 388,7 23,9886 58,6131 ee0040312 kastna * 123,3 23,9041 58,3232 ee0040313 kihnu * 9 198,8 23,948 58,1746 ee0040314 siiraku * 685,8 24,7878 58,2307 ee0040315 lauaru * 87,8 24,1205 58,5946 ee0040317 kivikupitsa * 135,6 24,4616 57,9297 ee0040318 kolga * 275,8 23,8318 58,3845 ee0040319 kosem e * 46,6 25,1495 58,2487 ee0040320 kuiaru * 221,7 24,7269 58,4894 ee0040321 k rissoo 32,4 24,6764 58,5685 ee0040322 laiksaare * 401,3 24,6383 58,1059 ee0040323 lao 19 24,1141 58,2396 ee0040324 lavassaare * 11 132,3 24,2671 58,5477 ee0040326 lindi * 1633 24,2057 58,3241 ee0040327 madissaare * 101,4 24,0254 58,6047 ee0040328 manilau-hanilaiu * 204,6 24,122 58,215 ee0040329 haapsi * 60,3 23,7423 58,3901 ee0040330 metsapoole * 60,7 24,3677 57,8969 ee0040331 m rdama * 1 524,9 24,8529 58,6001 ee0040332 naissoo * 116,3 24,1725 58,6095 ee0040333 navesti 9,7 2 24,9439 58,5016 ee0040334 nedrema * 2 441,8 24,0696 58,5449 ee0040335 nepste * 34,2 24,6565 58,0882 ee0040336 n tsi-v lla * 11 558,8 24,0856 58,4617 ee0040338 oese soo * 197,1 24,5166 58,6523 ee0040339 oidrema * 35,3 23,9119 58,5993 ee0040340 oraj e * 116,1 24,3957 57,9467 ee0040341 paadrema * 1 364,4 23,7662 58,5081 ee0040342 lemmej e 5,9 24,4933 57,961 ee0040343 pootsi 8,3 24,1208 58,2691 ee0040345 p rnu j e * 859,9 24,8719 58,5218 ee0040347 p rnu * 518,8 24,5965 58,3415 ee0040348 rannaniidu * 396,9 24,5268 58,3629 ee0040349 raespa * 245 23,817 58,3505 ee0040351 luitemaa * 13012 24,5325 58,1626 ee0040352 varbla * 280,4 23,7156 58,423 ee0040353 kurese * 524,6 24,1249 58,6414 ee0040354 saunametsa * 10 24,8647 58,2261 ee0040355 ura * 311,2 24,2042 58,5884 ee0040356 s meri * 362,5 23,7607 58,3483 ee0040357 tellissaare * 352,7 25,1056 58,5719 ee0040358 sorgu 5,9 24,1991 58,178 ee0040359 tolkuse * 810,3 24,6661 58,1564 ee0040360 tori p rgu 2,1 24,818 58,4834 ee0040361 t hela-ermistu * 3 149,8 23,9775 58,3867 ee0040362 sanga * 152,4 25,0886 58,123 ee0040363 t stamaa * 1 288,3 24,081 58,2852 ee0040364 uulu-v iste * 687,6 24,5429 58,2525 ee0040365 vahenurme * 222,5 24,392 58,6454 ee0040366 vaiste * 160,8 23,8675 58,3639 ee0040367 valgeranna * 98,3 24,4207 58,3889 ee0040368 mmam e * 42,1 24,7272 58,6161 ee0040369 sookuninga * 5 900,4 24,8254 58,0041 ee0040370 nigula * 6431 24,674 58,0121 ee0040375 valgeraba * 443 24,7353 58,2993 ee0040384 reiu j e 105,4 24,7023 58,2452 ee0040387 alva-k rsu * 143,2 25,0733 58,2354 ee0040401 abruka * 968,3 22,5076 58,1478 ee0040402 allirahu 1 970,5 22,7988 58,1573 ee0040403 asva * 63,5 23,0222 58,4085 ee0040404 haavassoo * 431,1 22,1969 58,2442 ee0040405 ranna * 22,9 22,2175 58,0462 ee0040406 siplase * 206,7 22,0924 57,9803 ee0040407 j rise * 1 058,6 22,4018 58,4787 ee0040408 j rve * 119 22,2792 58,1936 ee0040409 kaarma * 72 22,5237 58,354 ee0040410 kaarmise * 266,6 22,3507 58,35 ee0040412 kahtla-k bassaare * 14 090,2 23,1858 58,4152 ee0040414 karala-pilguse * 2658 21,9491 58,2457 ee0040415 karida * 29,9 22,3275 58,3104 ee0040416 karuj rve * 354,6 22,2146 58,3792 ee0040418 kasti lahe * 3 959,5 22,6132 58,2227 ee0040420 kaunispe * 126,5 22,0536 58,0255 ee0040421 kerju 79 22,5582 58,0984 ee0040422 keskn mme * 338,8 22,0399 58,4453 ee0040423 kingli * 518,1 23,0847 58,445 ee0040425 koigi * 2 371,4 22,9665 58,4877 ee0040426 kooljam gede * 8,3 22,5748 58,5062 ee0040427 kasemetsa * 8,1 22,2125 58,4639 ee0040428 koorun mme * 3 684,7 22,1497 58,4969 ee0040429 kotlandi * 74,6 22,0735 58,2269 ee0040430 k dema 21,5 22,3063 58,4742 ee0040432 k dema lahe * 4 501,8 22,2644 58,5318 ee0040433 kudjape * 17,1 22,5245 58,2619 ee0040435 laasu * 33,4 23,0288 58,4214 ee0040436 laidunina * 95 22,256 58,1331 ee0040437 lannasmaa * 14,3 22,0184 58,2847 ee0040438 liigalaskma-orin mme * 336,2 23,0062 58,5622 ee0040439 liiva-putla * 101,9 22,654 58,4021 ee0040440 lindmetsa * 84,9 22,0746 58,0561 ee0040441 kaugatoma-l u * 5 402,7 22,1593 58,1132 ee0040442 m e * 42 22,9435 58,3389 ee0040443 mullutu-loode * 5 816,9 22,3531 58,2524 ee0040445 n ssumaa * 274 22,7782 58,2754 ee0040446 nihatu * 49,9 22,788 58,539 ee0040447 n mmk la * 136,5 23,2038 58,665 ee0040448 odal tsi * 283,7 4 22,1113 58,3929 ee0040449 ohessaare * 20,1 22,0209 57,9941 ee0040451 paatsa * 99 22,3415 58,5067 ee0040452 pammana * 1 129,5 22,5323 58,6361 ee0040454 p duste luha 30,9 22,4739 58,2596 ee0040455 p duste-upa * 358,1 22,5146 58,2994 ee0040456 p hametsa * 26,8 22,6872 58,3567 ee0040457 rannaniidi * 397,9 23,3381 58,6403 ee0040458 ranna-p itse * 232,9 23,1676 58,6406 ee0040461 riksu ranniku * 2 194,7 22,0779 58,1802 ee0040462 ruhnu * 872,6 23,2408 57,804 ee0040463 saaremetsa * 84,8 23,1207 58,4533 ee0040464 s ren mme * 394,8 22,9706 58,5831 ee0040465 sandla * 13,6 22,8103 58,2945 ee0040466 sepa * 325,9 22,4627 58,3736 ee0040467 sepamaa * 60,6 22,5459 58,2542 ee0040469 siiksaare-oessaare * 3 972,7 22,8749 58,3087 ee0040470 simiste-oina * 100,1 23,3406 58,5716 ee0040472 sutu lahe * 2 151,8 22,7277 58,239 ee0040473 suurem isa lahe * 372,8 23,2305 58,5511 ee0040474 suurissoo 12,4 22,066 58,2856 ee0040475 uustalu 10 22,1408 58,4307 ee0040476 tagam isa * 13 552,1 21,9111 58,4882 ee0040477 tahula-reo * 582,3 22,6187 58,3072 ee0040478 tammese * 158,1 22,0093 58,42 ee0040479 tammuna * 56,2 22,0446 57,9435 ee0040480 teesu * 153,1 22,084 58,4141 ee0040481 tehu 4 22,1802 58,3038 ee0040482 t nija * 181,6 22,935 58,4093 ee0040483 kalli soo * 480,1 22,9071 58,3899 ee0040484 tumala * 150,5 23,0482 58,5459 ee0040485 vahtrissoo * 47,3 22,1498 58,3123 ee0040486 v ikese v ina * 17 730,7 23,1988 58,5463 ee0040487 vana-lahetaguse * 41,8 22,1179 58,1924 ee0040488 vanal ve * 69,4 22,8208 58,3657 ee0040489 vedruka raba * 109,8 22,0601 58,3293 ee0040490 vesit kimaa * 1 267,3 22,0192 57,9238 ee0040492 viidu 29,1 22,1475 58,2831 ee0040493 viidum e * 2 501,2 22,1101 58,2925 ee0040494 viieristi * 379,9 22,1721 58,0137 ee0040495 koimla * 31,8 22,1632 58,2176 ee0040496 vilsandi * 18 328,1 21,8828 58,3483 ee0040497 v rsna * 537,8 22,7504 58,3848 ee0040498 laasi * 8,8 22,2624 58,3164 ee0040499 raudrahu 983,8 22,4521 58,6646 ee0040500 gretagrundi 14 727,7 23,3282 57,6997 ee0060101 esna * 226,4 25,7778 58,981 ee0060102 m ru * 8 25,6969 58,6864 ee0060103 kurisoo * 47,4 25,7683 59,1256 ee0060104 kareda * 362,8 25,775 58,9291 ee0060105 rava * 16,3 25,851 59,1252 ee0060106 tudre * 60,1 25,9377 58,9701 ee0060107 vulbi * 11 25,69 59,1853 ee0060108 prandi * 875,9 25,6434 58,8352 ee0060109 l singu * 108,4 25,8941 59,1645 ee0060110 kiigum isa * 170 25,6581 59,0538 ee0060112 jalgsema * 41,5 25,9032 59,0849 ee0060113 silmsi soo * 146,4 25,933 58,8742 ee0060114 n mme raba * 436,8 25,4522 58,6986 ee0060115 iidva * 810 25,2994 58,8524 ee0060116 v tsa * 418,4 25,4745 58,9334 ee0060117 t ri-karjak la * 97,7 25,3874 58,7908 ee0060119 k rvemaa * 20 653,4 25,5493 59,1641 ee0060120 roosna-alliku * 43 25,7 59,0271 ee0060121 saarj e * 1 758,9 25,287 58,6242 ee0060122 preedi j e 1,1 26,1244 58,9213 ee0060123 v lingi oja 3,2 26,0556 58,8444 ee0060202 m driku-roela * 1 629,8 26,5184 59,2695 ee0060203 neeruti * 1 278,3 26,1331 59,2966 ee0060204 m dapea * 72,1 26,2604 59,3231 ee0060206 lasila * 344,9 26,1867 59,2525 ee0060207 haavakannu * 1213 26,4226 59,1936 ee0060208 suurekivi * 273,9 26,4111 59,2276 ee0060209 tudusoo * 5 307,7 26,7618 59,1413 ee0060210 ilmandu * 169,3 26,1216 59,0972 ee0060211 seljam e * 214,4 26,2433 58,9348 ee0060212 ntu * 391 26,2435 59,056 ee0060213 padaoru * 177,7 26,7028 59,4201 ee0060214 porkuni * 316,5 26,2424 59,2288 ee0060215 ebavere * 39 26,2221 59,1036 ee0060216 suigu * 130,9 26,8128 59,1415 ee0060217 luusika * 441,6 26,5815 59,0075 ee0060218 selja j e * 642,9 2 26,3502 59,5194 ee0060219 s mi * 946,3 26,6625 59,3928 ee0060220 uhtju 2 443,3 26,5106 59,6784 ee0060221 viitna * 314,6 26,0105 59,4416 ee0060223 mahu-rannametsa * 428,8 26,7404 59,4905 ee0060224 tammelehe 4,2 26,3163 58,994 ee0060225 varangu * 104,8 26,1083 59,0401 ee0060226 j ola 34,9 26,3009 59,0176 ee0060227 vinni-pajusti * 93,2 26,4315 59,2899 ee0060229 j rveoja 0,8 1 26,3374 59,5499 ee0060230 v lum e * 17,1 26,6037 59,3353 ee0060231 letipea * 516,5 26,5786 59,5515 ee0060232 noonu * 205,8 26,2071 59,5058 ee0060271 toolse * 467,9 26,4894 59,52 ee0060279 loobu j e 13,2 25,9756 59,4409 ee0060280 salla * 142,5 26,4075 58,9621 ee0070101 smolnitsa * 241,9 27,6603 59,0052 ee0070103 muraka * 16 443,4 27,1223 59,1534 ee0070104 sirtsi * 6182 26,8083 59,2619 ee0070105 mustaj e * 77,7 27,8808 59,2907 ee0070106 puhatu * 12 785,6 27,7237 59,1639 ee0070108 ontika * 254,4 27,426 59,4278 ee0070109 pangametsa * 180,6 27,337 59,4412 ee0070110 udria * 376,7 27,8977 59,3971 ee0070111 m etaguse * 53,1 27,3216 59,2251 ee0070112 aseri * 654,7 26,8768 59,433 ee0070113 edise 4,6 27,3863 59,3847 ee0070115 kauksi * 9,7 27,2054 58,9969 ee0070117 atsalama * 9,2 27,3886 59,2403 ee0070118 nniksaare 3,2 26,9573 59,0191 ee0070119 j uga * 63 27,4632 59,1756 ee0070120 kurtna * 418,5 27,5781 59,2475 ee0070122 j rvev lja * 318,3 27,1516 58,9819 ee0070123 p ite * 128,8 27,6347 59,4149 ee0070124 selisoo * 1 443,6 27,271 59,1809 ee0070125 uljaste * 256,4 26,7702 59,3655 ee0070126 sahmeni 27 460,2 27,27 58,8953 ee0070127 avij e 28,9 28 26,8998 58,9875 ee0070128 struuga 1 724,2 16 27,7914 59,094 ee0070129 p haj e 5,8 5 27,5311 59,4155 ee0070132 uhaku * 32,8 27,0211 59,3709 ee0070171 agusalu * 12 014,5 27,5465 59,0797 ee0070175 adraku * 215 26,8428 58,9428 ee0070179 alaj e * 111 27,4305 59,0321 ee0070187 k rasi * 152,6 26,9788 58,9469 ee0070189 viivikonna * 28,5 27,7342 59,321 ee0080101 saarj rve * 159,2 26,7619 58,6551 ee0080102 v tikvere * 116,5 26,8243 58,8791 ee0080103 tellise * 238,1 26,881 58,8391 ee0080104 aidu * 315,6 26,2239 58,6978 ee0080106 padinasaare * 40,7 26,204 58,7627 ee0080107 andressaare * 3,6 25,7613 58,6064 ee0080108 k pa * 2 296,2 26,8523 58,6277 ee0080109 mustallika * 49,7 26,4308 58,716 ee0080110 vooremaa j rvede * 2 109,5 26,6645 58,5601 ee0080111 kaasiku * 3,8 26,1862 58,7079 ee0080172 endla * 10161 26,1421 58,8723 ee0080173 aidu soo * 332,6 26,1578 58,7206 ee0080177 oti * 54,6 26,7078 58,9039 ee0080178 tooni * 22 26,3591 58,6426 ee0080179 kirikuraba * 446,7 26,3916 58,5835 ee0080201 kooraste pikkj rve 14,7 26,5889 57,9728 ee0080202 ihamaru-tilleoru * 416,1 26,9294 58,0725 ee0080203 meelva * 2 136,6 27,3314 58,1592 ee0080204 meenikunno * 3 027,6 27,3153 57,9405 ee0080205 valgesoo * 343,2 27,0724 58,1444 ee0080206 veski * 61,8 26,7868 58,1253 ee0080207 mooste * 16,9 27,131 58,1609 ee0080208 peramaa * 29,3 27,2487 58,2401 ee0080209 kirmsi * 219,8 27,4115 58,0528 ee0080210 p evakese * 62,7 27,5047 57,9284 ee0080211 v ik -neds j 2,5 27,5858 57,8932 ee0080212 rebasm e * 32,1 27,4511 57,9546 ee0080213 tahkj rve soo * 31,3 26,9753 57,944 ee0080214 hauka * 50,9 26,6249 58,0524 ee0080215 v rska 41,6 27,6231 57,96 ee0080216 r pina 56,2 27,448 58,0963 ee0080217 ahja * 1 142,7 27,0211 58,1316 ee0080218 karste 1,4 26,6698 58,0104 ee0080220 kanepi j rvede 110,1 26,7607 58,0068 ee0080221 valgj rve 66,5 26,6392 58,0892 ee0080222 paloj rve 8,1 26,912 58,0837 ee0080223 kivij rve 6,1 27,1984 58,0411 ee0080224 akste j rve 5,6 27,051 58,1693 ee0080225 laho 2,7 27,1397 58,1495 ee0080226 virosi 11,7 27,2564 58,0295 ee0080227 pahtp 4,8 27,3814 58,0568 ee0080229 os tsuu * 26,1 26,8721 58,0901 ee0080230 kuulmaj rve * 1 016,2 27,1578 57,9653 ee0080231 l bnitsa * 1 550,5 27,5706 58,0687 ee0080232 uiakatsi 19,4 26,6306 57,951 ee0080233 kooraste k vv rj rve 13 26,6645 57,9661 ee0080234 mustoja * 3 518,1 27,6577 57,888 ee0080235 v handu j e rgoru * 249,6 27,2187 57,9752 ee0080236 v handu j e 22,3 26,7343 57,9239 ee0080237 m daj e 23,5 27,491 58,0204 ee0080239 karisilla oja 10,7 27,5986 57,9929 ee0080272 maruoru * 32,2 26,6807 57,9893 ee0080274 oodsipalo * 75 27,368 57,9103 ee0080275 akste 7,6 27,1122 58,1499 ee0080277 kr dneri 2,7 26,6964 58,1217 ee0080301 p hklisaare * 770,1 27,0081 58,4373 ee0080302 age oru 22,5 26,8486 58,3031 ee0080303 v gvere 6,2 26,8371 58,4752 ee0080304 sootaga 59,4 26,7332 58,4823 ee0080305 konguta 32,6 26,2795 58,2128 ee0080306 padak rve * 1 555,2 27,0101 58,5967 ee0080307 j rvselja * 187,9 27,3231 58,2767 ee0080310 anne 15,8 26,7777 58,3635 ee0080311 alatskivi * 383,3 27,1066 58,6116 ee0080312 lavatsi j rve 9 26,953 58,3113 ee0080313 ropka-ihaste * 755,6 26,7542 58,33 ee0080314 pangodi 101,3 26,5719 58,195 ee0080315 mustj rve 20,4 26,1419 58,2075 ee0080316 keeri-karij rve * 1 935,4 26,4412 58,3124 ee0080317 viisjaagu 25,6 26,4338 58,2624 ee0080318 elva * 1 072,6 26,4266 58,1883 ee0080319 lahepera 14 129,2 27,3292 58,5871 ee0080320 kallaste 1 27,1647 58,6579 ee0080322 v lgi * 762 26,9051 58,5554 ee0080323 peipsiveere * 34610 27,2945 58,3883 ee0080324 peeda j e 5,7 26,7202 58,2222 ee0080371 k revere * 2510 26,5238 58,4512 ee0080374 alam-pedja * 34 671,9 26,1978 58,4791 ee0080375 tatra 2,8 26,6802 58,2503 ee0080376 sinik la * 34,9 26,3562 58,5305 ee0080401 otep * 22 565,5 26,4274 58,0487 ee0080402 lubjaahju j rve 1,2 26,5722 57,975 ee0080403 lambahanna j rve 4,1 26,5551 57,9854 ee0080404 voki 16,6 26,5407 57,9884 ee0080405 vidrike 13,8 26,5239 57,9857 ee0080407 prange 38,1 26,2006 58,0445 ee0080408 sauniku * 121,2 26,1394 58,0019 ee0080410 soontaga-sauniku * 1 552,8 26,0912 58,0368 ee0080411 kurematsi * 8,3 26,1166 58,0913 ee0080412 andresj rve 3,4 26,1038 58,0925 ee0080413 palakm e 138,2 25,9445 58,0483 ee0080414 tikste * 37,8 25,9019 57,9994 ee0080415 t ndre * 1 846,8 25,6188 57,9614 ee0080416 lasa * 473,8 25,7794 57,9217 ee0080417 pikre j rve 12,4 25,9098 57,9182 ee0080418 roksi j rve 2,9 25,914 57,9176 ee0080419 linaleo j rve 1 25,9293 57,9416 ee0080420 koork la * 352,9 25,8654 57,8968 ee0080421 koiva-mustj e luha * 3 196,3 26,3611 57,6163 ee0080422 aheru 232,5 26,3522 57,6873 ee0080423 kiiviti j rve 12,7 26,3322 57,7215 ee0080424 karula-pikkj rve * 363,7 26,3106 57,7714 ee0080425 kuritse j rve 12,1 26,3465 57,8631 ee0080426 tagula 21,3 26,3705 57,8777 ee0080427 valli soo 26,7 26,2694 57,8816 ee0080428 ru 12,1 26,1763 57,9123 ee0080429 kada j rve 8,5 26,0569 57,9921 ee0080430 koikk la * 3,5 26,262 57,6888 ee0080432 v ike-emaj e 19,8 26,0537 58,0635 ee0080433 purtsi j e 8,1 26,1093 58,0796 ee0080472 m neku * 48,3 26,228 57,9012 ee0080474 kakulaane * 39 26,3863 57,8871 ee0080475 kirbu soo * 68,1 26,3527 57,7832 ee0080476 keisripalu * 32,8 25,9159 58,0188 ee0080477 riidaja * 12,9 25,9059 58,1034 ee0080501 rubina * 2108 25,7588 58,0699 ee0080502 rutu 330,1 25,6586 58,0427 ee0080503 kullam e 5,4 25,8768 58,2185 ee0080504 teringi * 322,4 25,551 57,9776 ee0080505 lopa paljandi 0,8 25,4557 58,117 ee0080506 kiviaru * 32,8 25,9113 58,4412 ee0080507 tilli 6,3 25,6823 58,3116 ee0080509 kurimetsa * 56,9 25,6794 58,0793 ee0080510 leppoja * 378 25,337 58,3838 ee0080511 t nassilma 113,6 25,9242 58,4155 ee0080512 ruhij rve 87,6 25,5147 58,0138 ee0080514 viljandi 156,2 25,5977 58,3494 ee0080515 kariste j rve 61,9 25,3461 58,1441 ee0080516 isu * 595,5 25,5345 58,1982 ee0080517 muti 158,8 25,6835 58,1347 ee0080518 paistu * 53,5 25,5953 58,2742 ee0080519 sinialliku * 99,3 25,5673 58,2985 ee0080520 heimtali * 219,8 25,5119 58,3247 ee0080521 kahvena * 720,9 25,2342 58,2791 ee0080523 lepakose * 27,2 25,3192 58,5811 ee0080524 v rtsj rve * 29737 26,0494 58,2821 ee0080573 parika * 2 197,4 25,7733 58,5043 ee0080574 soomaa * 40 240,2 25,1058 58,4406 ee0080576 p idre * 43,3 25,4972 58,2567 ee0080577 otik la * 62,5 25,9401 58,4304 ee0080578 maalasti * 529,8 25,6975 58,5916 ee0080579 pillu * 25,3 25,6568 58,6534 ee0080601 luhasoo * 802,5 26,9042 57,6452 ee0080602 hino * 701,4 27,2031 57,5821 ee0080603 kisej rve * 668,5 27,1992 57,6276 ee0080604 murati * 182,5 27,0974 57,581 ee0080605 p rlij e 26,6 26,8362 57,7146 ee0080606 v ike-palkna * 24,7 26,9696 57,6087 ee0080607 kirikum e * 361,7 27,2498 57,6822 ee0080608 peetri j e * 499,8 26,5487 57,5549 ee0080610 hintsiko * 29,3 26,691 57,6082 ee0080611 hurda * 214,2 26,8243 57,7094 ee0080612 vagula j rve 601,1 26,9134 57,8464 ee0080613 haanja * 17 039,6 27,0609 57,7133 ee0080614 sadram tsa * 362,6 26,7635 57,6647 ee0080615 sadrametsa * 244 26,8043 57,6547 ee0080616 p hni * 277,7 26,7769 57,6389 ee0080617 parmu * 1 026,7 27,3163 57,5509 ee0080618 verij rve * 81,2 27,0541 57,8086 ee0080619 m isam tsa * 231,3 26,6544 57,5804 ee0080620 pullij rve 63,1 27,2151 57,6043 ee0080621 piusa-v mmorski * 492,4 27,4514 57,8373 ee0080622 piusa * 1 225,9 27,3599 57,7789 ee0080623 uhtj rve 44,7 26,5666 57,898 ee0080624 l dla 98,7 26,6527 57,8694 ee0080625 pabra j rve 58,2 27,3898 57,6094 ee0080626 karsna j rve 16,8 27,0953 57,929 ee0080627 kubija j rve 17,5 27,0013 57,8135 ee0080628 k rnj rve 7,9 27,1619 57,9011 ee0080629 majori j rve 17,9 27,0552 57,5914 ee0080630 lasva tammiku * 19,1 27,2011 57,8419 ee0080631 kaasj rve 3 27,0727 57,7991 ee0080632 paganamaa * 200,8 26,8166 57,5847 ee0080635 timmase * 390,3 26,8827 57,815 ee0080637 tamula j rve 210,9 26,9854 57,8384 ee0080638 p rlij e luha 40,5 26,9659 57,6174 ee0080671 karula * 13 258,8 26,4933 57,7089 fi0100001 b lsviken-stormossen * 282, 22,9719 59,9436 fi0100002 tapels sen-lind viken-heimlax * 516, 23,2053 60,0294 fi0100003 harpar stortr sket ja lilltr sket * 225, 23,3214 59,9406 fi0100005 tammisaaren ja hangon saariston ja pohjanpit j nlahden merensuojelualue * 52630, 23,3964 59,8464 fi0100006 tulliniemen linnustonsuojelualue * 2566, 22,8594 59,8133 fi0100007 santalankorpi * 73, 23,1072 59,8611 fi0100008 bengts rin lehto * 17, 23,1094 59,9008 fi0100009 varvarinsuo * 60, 23,8136 60,1192 fi0100010 tulij rvi-makubergen * 47, 23,6586 60,1694 fi0100011 l pptr sket * 199, 23,6575 60,0469 fi0100012 karkali, suuriniemi ja mailan alueet * 120, 23,7975 60,2408 fi0100013 puuj rvi * 694, 23,7092 60,2536 fi0100014 kalkkim ki ja laukm ki * 67, 23,6661 60,1972 fi0100015 myllym ki 7, 24,0083 60,3425 fi0100016 elisaaren ja r vassin lehdot * 23, 23,9050 59,9822 fi0100017 inkoon saaristo * 203, 24,0711 59,9414 fi0100018 stormossen * 107, 24,0814 60,0711 fi0100021 meiko-lapptr sk * 1949, 24,3514 60,1492 fi0100022 finntr skin vanhat mets t * 154, 24,5528 60,1300 fi0100023 mustionjoki 187,71 32,1 23,6933 60,0961 fi0100024 medvast -stormossen * 821, 24,5714 60,0731 fi0100025 saltfj rdenin-tavastfj rdenin lintuvedet * 260, 24,4892 60,0900 fi0100026 kirkkonummen saaristo (sci) * 1750, 24,4533 59,9772 fi0100027 espoonlahti-saunalahti * 223, 24,5639 60,1678 fi0100028 laajalahden lintuvesi * 192, 24,8233 60,1953 fi0100029 pohjan-kiskon j rvialue * 1038, 23,5383 60,1769 fi0100030 pikkuj rvi 87, 23,9386 60,1750 fi0100031 lohjanharju ja ojamonkangas 272, 24,1617 60,2858 fi0100032 lintukiimanvuori 42, 23,8997 60,4344 fi0100033 k rr, strykmossen ja pytberg * 73, 23,9425 60,1469 fi0100034 karstunlahden mets ja kalliot * 34, 23,9364 60,2869 fi0100035 lakim en mets * 50, 23,9672 60,2903 fi0100036 lohjanj rven alueet * 213, 23,8892 60,2017 fi0100037 kaanaan vanha mets * 17, 24,8494 60,4428 fi0100038 klaukkalan isosuo * 148, 24,7219 60,3739 fi0100039 konianvuori * 123, 24,4047 60,4678 fi0100040 nuuksio * 5644, 24,5208 60,3142 fi0100041 vanj rvi, m rj ntienm ki ja laukkam ki * 180, 24,2333 60,4450 fi0100043 ker kankare ja kylm l hde * 171, 23,9039 60,4908 fi0100044 lemmenlaakson lehto * 94, 25,1483 60,4775 fi0100045 keravanjokikanjonin lehto 54, 25,0347 60,5664 fi0100047 asemansuo * 18, 24,2058 60,5414 fi0100048 vaskij rven mets * 106, 24,3850 60,5839 fi0100049 keih ssuo * 127, 24,4067 60,5672 fi0100050 haaviston alueet * 59, 24,4008 60,5344 fi0100051 kyt j n-usmin mets alue * 2266, 24,6850 60,6333 fi0100052 j rvisuo-ridasj rvi * 686, 24,9778 60,6392 fi0100053 petkelsuo * 284, 24,7633 60,5911 fi0100054 svinberget-lagerholmen * 56, 23,0253 60,0722 fi0100055 l ng n kosteikko * 46, 23,7858 60,0658 fi0100056 kalkkilammi-s ksj rvi * 976, 24,6661 60,5103 fi0100057 v h j rvenkallioiden vanha mets * 74, 25,4292 60,7244 fi0100058 kotoj rvi-isosuo * 365, 25,2494 60,6686 fi0100059 kivilamminsuo-pitk stenj rvet * 220, 25,1067 60,6411 fi0100060 mustamets * 30, 25,1506 60,6225 fi0100061 ohkolanjokilaakso * 22, 25,1703 60,5492 fi0100062 vanhankaupunginlahden lintuvesi * 316, 25,0075 60,2106 fi0100063 kallahden harju-, niitty- ja vesialueet * 251, 25,1486 60,1850 fi0100064 vestran suot, lehdot ja vanhat mets t * 369, 24,7689 60,3242 fi0100065 mustavuoren lehto ja stersundomin lintuvedet * 355, 25,1569 60,2356 fi0100066 sipoonkorpi * 1267, 25,1728 60,3094 fi0100067 g sterbyn j rvet ja suot * 199, 25,3050 60,3133 fi0100068 boxin suot * 156, 25,4703 60,2992 fi0100069 r rstrandin vanha mets * 287, 25,1939 60,4572 fi0100070 lampisuo * 120, 25,3894 60,5217 fi0100071 venunmets * 41, 25,4536 60,6567 fi0100072 kanteleenj rven lintuvesi 93, 25,6756 60,6633 fi0100073 mieli issuo * 170, 25,8692 60,8156 fi0100074 porvoonjoen suisto-stensb le * 1331, 25,7014 60,3572 fi0100075 tungtr sketin vanha mets * 20, 25,7408 60,4167 fi0100076 em salon suot * 100, 25,6092 60,2544 fi0100077 s dersk rin ja l ng renin saaristo * 18219, 25,6356 60,1383 fi0100078 pernajanlahtien ja pernajan saariston merensuojelualue * 65775, 26,1778 60,2733 fi0100079 ilveskallion vanha mets * 21, 26,1183 60,6583 fi0100080 k llaudden-virstholmen * 87, 26,3047 60,3844 fi0100081 kullafj rdenin lintuvesi * 185, 26,4125 60,4244 fi0100083 vahterp n fladat * 104, 26,5156 60,3578 fi0100085 siuntionjoki 303, 47,59 24,2753 60,1181 fi0100086 sipoonjoki 69,16 25,2764 60,3819 fi0100088 kairassuon vanha mets * 9, 25,3106 60,7164 fi0100089 kallb danin luodot ja vesialue 1520, 24,3061 59,8706 fi0100090 haukkam ki * 23, 23,8694 60,5564 fi0100091 b nbergetin aarnialue * 18, 24,7000 60,2697 fi0100092 matalaj rvi * 112, 24,6906 60,2519 fi0100093 stormossenin aarnialue * 93, 23,1736 59,8492 fi0100094 mets kulma * 151, 25,4094 60,6456 fi0100095 peltolan vanha mets * 48, 25,4011 60,5983 fi0100096 tomasb leb cken * 10, 23,4872 60,0631 fi0100097 rientolan mets * 39, 25,2856 60,4931 fi0100098 bytr sket 18,5 25,4117 60,2669 fi0100099 kummelbergen * 166, 25,2411 60,4808 fi0100100 torsg rdin mets * 44, 24,3081 60,2406 fi0100101 sterfj rden * 95, 23,8033 59,9817 fi0100102 vaanilanlahti 68, 24,1183 60,3103 fi0100104 vantaanjoki 59 24,0678 60,0339 fi0100106 sandkallanin etel puolinen merialue 7468, 25,5592 59,4744 fi0100107 hangon it inen selk 11098, 23,0000 59,1864 fi0200001 puurij rvi-isosuo * 3204, 22,5703 61,2536 fi0200002 rauman diabaasialue * 76, 21,5450 61,1753 fi0200003 stormossen * 139, 22,5314 60,0642 fi0200004 stormossen (kemi ) * 191, 22,6067 60,1842 fi0200005 koskossuo * 41, 23,3806 60,1833 fi0200007 rehtisuo * 226, 22,2517 60,6044 fi0200008 himmaistenrahka * 383, 22,7414 60,9292 fi0200009 lastensuo * 279, 21,8406 61,2931 fi0200010 hyypp r n harjualue * 2468, 23,6678 60,4828 fi0200011 varesharju * 271, 23,7111 60,4336 fi0200012 pyysuo * 192, 23,3397 60,2122 fi0200013 raadesuo * 213, 23,3947 60,2825 fi0200014 rimpisuo-siikelisuo * 584, 22,3589 61,4975 fi0200015 karhuper nrahka * 909, 23,0053 60,5606 fi0200016 eksyssuo * 497, 23,1419 60,7703 fi0200017 kukilankeidas * 331, 21,6883 61,9497 fi0200018 mankaneva * 454, 21,5275 61,9447 fi0200019 pitk suo * 448, 22,2758 61,6425 fi0200020 myllyl hde 15, 22,7069 60,9031 fi0200021 haapakeidas * 5779, 21,9869 61,9858 fi0200022 pohjankangas * 3837, 22,4644 61,9375 fi0200023 sinahmi * 467, 22,1583 61,7875 fi0200024 h meenkangas * 4369, 22,6300 61,7803 fi0200025 vakka-suomen kedot * 3, 21,4722 60,6794 fi0200026 harolanlahti * 343, 22,1853 61,0956 fi0200028 kaarinan mets t * 57, 22,4647 60,4061 fi0200030 omenaj rvi * 230, 23,5403 60,4175 fi0200031 otaj rvi * 581, 21,6553 60,9919 fi0200032 k yli nj rvi * 303, 22,3453 61,1319 fi0200033 kasalanjokisuu * 1061, 21,3917 61,9217 fi0200037 tapilanlahti * 314, 22,6369 60,2853 fi0200038 aasla kramppi * 338, 21,9942 60,2906 fi0200040 kolkanaukko * 429, 21,5511 60,5914 fi0200041 kulju * 472, 21,3769 60,9275 fi0200042 ahmasvesi * 259, 21,5006 60,6639 fi0200045 piril nkoski * 147, 22,0994 61,3422 fi0200046 houtsk rin lehdot * 256, 21,3197 60,2833 fi0200047 ini n saaret * 239, 21,1694 60,3956 fi0200048 lemulanrinne 79, 23,5631 60,3111 fi0200049 vanhakoski * 101, 22,6833 61,1633 fi0200050 korkeaniemenkallio * 80, 23,5942 60,2203 fi0200052 vensorin lehto * 70, 21,5481 60,2919 fi0200053 hulaholmi kluuvi * 56, 21,2933 60,5514 fi0200056 orikvuori * 20, 21,6686 60,6031 fi0200057 ruissalon lehdot * 852, 22,1519 60,4278 fi0200059 s kyl nharju * 1311, 22,5753 61,0042 fi0200060 rauvolanlahti * 366, 22,2608 60,3831 fi0200061 pomponrahka * 135, 22,2578 60,5036 fi0200062 lmos-purunp * 1056, 22,3825 60,0069 fi0200063 lenholm * 129, 22,2106 60,2431 fi0200064 seilin saaristo * 4687, 21,9483 60,2400 fi0200065 pakinaisten saaristo * 571, 21,6842 60,3308 fi0200066 untamala * 27, 21,6803 60,8967 fi0200067 l vsk rsfj rdenin reunasaaret * 80, 21,3992 60,1422 fi0200068 nauvon kluuvij rvet * 124, 21,8081 60,2000 fi0200069 biskops n kluuvij rvet * 237, 22,5225 59,9769 fi0200070 vansorin kluuvij rvi * 188, 21,8375 60,1258 fi0200071 keisti n fladat * 156, 21,3128 60,3722 fi0200072 uudenkaupungin saaristo * 56992, 21,0769 60,9075 fi0200073 rauman saaristo * 5350, 21,3447 61,1828 fi0200074 luvian saaristo * 7602, 21,3544 61,4100 fi0200075 gummandooran saaristo * 3294, 21,3869 61,6917 fi0200076 pooskerin saaristo * 3151, 21,4553 61,7697 fi0200077 ouran saaristo * 3073, 21,3586 61,8458 fi0200078 pinkj rvi * 1681, 21,7267 61,2936 fi0200079 kokem enjoen suisto * 2885, 21,6203 61,5789 fi0200080 preiviikinlahti * 5552, 21,5217 61,5247 fi0200081 kuuminaistenniemi * 274, 21,4581 61,5067 fi0200082 alhonm ki * 62, 23,1661 60,1731 fi0200083 kiskonjoen vesist * 309, 23,2642 60,1511 fi0200084 kurjenrahka * 3093, 22,4031 60,7256 fi0200085 vaskij rvi * 2120, 22,2350 60,8358 fi0200086 teijon yl nk * 3457, 22,9872 60,2361 fi0200087 huhdansuo kakkeriansuo * 365, 21,8733 61,2442 fi0200088 kakossuo * 223, 23,0839 60,5128 fi0200090 saaristomeri * 49735, 21,7956 59,7972 fi0200091 karvian luomat 41,08 22,5014 62,2047 fi0200093 kontolanrahka * 857, 22,7889 60,7817 fi0200094 punkalaitumen isosuo * 419, 23,0033 61,0831 fi0200095 reksuo * 411, 23,2694 60,6308 fi0200096 nukinrahka hirvilamminsuo * 861,2 21,9883 60,8564 fi0200097 koskelj rvi * 1821, 22,1192 60,9339 fi0200098 kolkansuo * 1091, 22,1247 60,8303 fi0200099 iso-h l * 941, 21,9386 60,9139 fi0200100 telkunsuo * 902, 23,1817 61,0042 fi0200101 isoneva (pomarkku) * 934, 21,9836 61,6664 fi0200102 rekijokilaakso * 1209, 23,4164 60,5556 fi0200103 paimionjokilaakso 156, 22,6931 60,5117 fi0200104 houtskarin pohjoiset saaret * 93, 21,1636 60,3542 fi0200105 houtsk rin nummisaaret * 80, 21,1286 60,2972 fi0200106 kivij rven mets t * 174, 21,7844 60,7344 fi0200107 laitilan mets t * 108, 21,8078 61,0300 fi0200108 mustfinntr sket * 113, 22,1242 60,3067 fi0200109 maisaarensuo * 201, 22,6272 60,9281 fi0200111 paraisten harjusaaret * 211, 22,1175 60,1728 fi0200112 langstet * 206, 21,3700 60,4989 fi0200113 kemi nsaaren kalliot * 195, 22,7144 60,0206 fi0200114 kustavin vuoret 45, 21,4206 60,5417 fi0200117 laukkallio 39, 23,6033 60,3156 fi0200119 pukanluoma 44,92 22,3661 61,9078 fi0200120 kiskonjoen latvavedet * 55,66 15,22 23,6561 60,3781 fi0200121 l ngviken 100, 21,1864 60,4406 fi0200123 kalafj lli * 25, 21,4892 61,8322 fi0200125 vaisakko * 82, 23,0503 60,3617 fi0200126 uudenkaupungin saarnimets t * 57, 21,2567 60,8775 fi0200127 paraisten kalliot 39, 22,2342 60,2331 fi0200128 lemun lehdot * 26, 21,9842 60,5372 fi0200129 paraisten orkidea-alue 4, 22,2919 60,2889 fi0200130 karvianjoen kosket * 80,07 40,09 22,2625 62,0425 fi0200131 merikarvian laitumet * 21, 21,5261 61,7650 fi0200132 somerniemen mets * 16, 23,7514 60,5811 fi0200133 s rkisalon kalliot * 203, 22,8536 60,0825 fi0200134 paraisten kalkkialueet * 42, 22,2433 60,2844 fi0200137 j k l neva isoneva * 346, 22,6553 62,2817 fi0200138 palanutkangas * 18, 22,2833 61,5094 fi0200141 s nkorna * 26, 22,4333 60,2794 fi0200143 kaasmarkunm ki * 14, 22,0203 61,4717 fi0200146 lohm-kulm- ng * 341, 21,7333 60,0981 fi0200147 siikaisten laitumet * 37, 21,8175 61,9603 fi0200148 kokem enjoki 187, 22,5633 61,2375 fi0200154 harsholm * 18, 22,3233 60,3642 fi0200155 pitk niemenkeidas * 803, 22,5606 62,0250 fi0200156 rastiaisneva * 311, 22,6639 62,1306 fi0200157 lavij rven-paloj rven kalliot * 233, 22,6831 61,5692 fi0200158 matovuori * 51, 21,9514 61,8500 fi0200159 kotkavuori 119, 22,5233 60,3875 fi0200160 kallavuori * 12, 22,0050 60,6461 fi0200161 pyh j rvi 15297, 22,2933 60,9994 fi0200163 porsmusan suo * 21, 21,5856 61,4092 fi0200165 isoniemi * 18, 23,4006 60,3272 fi0200166 saarikonm ki * 15, 22,8758 61,0536 fi0200167 valkaman mets * 44, 23,8775 60,6128 fi0200168 lumikallio * 17, 22,5647 60,8072 fi0200169 hallonn s * 9, 21,3147 60,3342 fi0200171 helvetinkorpi * 19,2 23,1542 60,5008 fi0200172 katanp * 364, 21,1694 60,6114 fi0200174 vuonaj rvi * 24, 21,6561 61,2586 fi0200175 p iv rinteen laidun * 2, 23,0042 60,4772 fi0200176 vaajalan laitumet * 10, 22,1647 61,4178 fi0200177 lassasin mets * 60,3 21,4231 60,1897 fi0200178 kiettareen korvet * 2, 22,5061 61,2556 fi0200179 hannasin keto * 0,6 21,5069 60,1811 fi0200180 j rventausta * 20, 22,1219 61,5111 fi0200181 hallusvuori * 19,1 22,0269 60,5564 fi0200182 protson letto * 9, 21,8747 61,3986 fi0200183 kuivakosken niitty * 5, 23,2539 60,4581 fi0200184 ylijoen laidun * 3,2 23,2969 60,4583 fi0200185 ajolan laitumet * 4,7 21,8172 60,4036 fi0200186 uutiskuuva * 4, 22,0031 60,3361 fi0200187 viuvalannummi 6, 23,8586 60,5094 fi0200188 pitk kallio * 38, 22,2972 60,9061 fi0200189 horjunkeidas * 250, 22,6203 62,0453 fi0200190 nautelankoski * 8, 22,4556 60,5569 fi0200191 salaj rven korpi * 2, 22,0014 61,0869 fi0200192 vuorelanm ki * 37, 23,0628 60,4333 fi0200193 r * 376, 22,3208 59,8136 fi0301001 riihikallio-pilkanm ki * 64, 25,7836 61,0992 fi0301003 mukkulammi * 60, 25,7669 61,2722 fi0301005 aurinkovuori 764, 25,4708 61,1967 fi0301007 rominoja * 78, 25,7161 61,1906 fi0301009 pitk kallion mets * 28, 25,6664 61,2531 fi0301010 asikkalan letot * 34, 25,6419 61,1656 fi0301011 kalkkistenkoski * 27, 25,5964 61,2844 fi0301012 tupsuvuori 36, 25,5961 61,3406 fi0301014 valtionk rki * 18,5 25,7728 61,2528 fi0301016 uraj rvi * 447, 25,7925 61,1589 fi0301017 vanhakartanon id nverijuurialue * 0,26 25,4414 61,2644 fi0302001 koij rvi * 242, 23,7308 60,9783 fi0303003 sattula-ilveskallio 48, 24,3242 61,0211 fi0303006 vanajaveden alue * 1341, 24,1197 61,1567 fi0303007 lehij rvi 52, 24,2992 61,0528 fi0303010 ylisen savij rven suot * 21, 24,2683 61,0078 fi0303011 taipaleensuo-kolisevankorpi * 84, 24,1114 60,9903 fi0303013 hanhisuo-saunasuo-alajoki * 146, 24,2342 60,9783 fi0303016 vinjalamminharju * 56, 24,1811 61,0028 fi0303018 ky pelinvuori-fagerinm ki 3, 24,5208 61,0617 fi0303019 onkilammi-tunturilammi 15,8 24,1514 60,9392 fi0303020 hervannonkorpi * 1,43 24,3914 61,1167 fi0304001 jokij rvi 101, 24,3833 61,2011 fi0304003 ruskeanmullanharju 6,4 24,6333 61,1383 fi0304004 s yli nkorpi * 4,2 24,6417 61,2278 fi0305004 mustasuo * 214, 24,9839 60,6878 fi0305005 kilpisuo (hausj rvi) * 333, 25,1350 60,7272 fi0306003 tiirismaa * 245, 25,5200 61,0078 fi0306004 p hkin kukkula 13, 25,6175 61,0497 fi0306006 kutaj rven alue 1051, 25,4531 61,0608 fi0306009 kotaj rvi * 11, 25,3792 61,0100 fi0309001 vatulanharju-ulvaanharju * 1089, 22,9597 61,7100 fi0309008 huutisuo-sasi * 60, 23,3242 61,5850 fi0310001 karittainm ki-ahvenistonlampi * 134, 24,6008 61,0589 fi0310002 hattelmalanharju * 39, 24,4569 60,9769 fi0310003 ahvenistonharju-vuorenharju * 130, 24,4147 60,9967 fi0310005 raimansuo-miemalanharju * 131, 24,5525 60,9381 fi0310006 aulangon alue * 353, 24,4633 61,0217 fi0310008 matinsilta 14,3 24,4644 60,9417 fi0311001 lymylampi * 63, 23,5811 61,8244 fi0311002 seitseminen * 4530, 23,4253 61,9278 fi0312002 toivanjoen kalliot * 126, 24,6056 60,7947 fi0312003 janakkalan suurisuo * 232, 24,7967 60,9958 fi0312005 hyv -valkeen laskupuro * 3,8 24,8797 60,9153 fi0312006 tunturinvuori 5,6 24,6261 60,9592 fi0312007 linnam ki 2,1 24,7161 60,8428 fi0312008 m yr nlammi 2,95 24,8353 60,9097 fi0315001 kaskenm ki * 45, 24,0869 61,1161 fi0315002 kalliomaa (kalvola) * 94, 24,0761 61,0903 fi0315005 peurasuo * 95, 24,0308 60,9797 fi0315007 porttilanharju 4,1 24,1344 61,0169 fi0316001 keisarinharju-vehoniemenharju * 267,8 24,1814 61,4000 fi0316004 hepom ki-kalkunvuori * 18, 24,2222 61,4153 fi0316005 kirkkoj rven alue * 305, 24,0600 61,4558 fi0316007 salmuksen alue * 364, 23,9136 61,4094 fi0316008 hautalammi * 2,1 23,9764 61,3694 fi0317001 p retkivenneva-teerineva-pohjasneva * 565, 23,1175 62,2928 fi0318001 kiikoisten mets * 23, 22,6017 61,4128 fi0319004 sipil n niitty * 7,3 24,7947 61,5417 fi0320001 matolammi-m ntym ki * 122, 24,8464 62,0447 fi0320002 v r -v ihi * 37, 24,6400 61,8875 fi0321001 pet j j rvi * 254, 23,5783 61,9083 fi0321002 pit m vuoret * 59, 23,6106 62,0422 fi0321003 raattaniemi-vekaraniemi * 89, 23,3761 62,0064 fi0321004 pikku-suolij rvi * 197,5 23,6400 61,8550 fi0321007 isoneva-raitakulonneva * 139, 23,5747 62,0983 fi0321008 aurej rvi 717, 23,3628 62,0856 fi0321009 pitk kangas * 34, 23,6289 61,9400 fi0321010 mets opiston mets * 8, 23,7139 61,8686 fi0323001 koivum ki-luutasuo * 287, 25,2161 60,8431 fi0324001 linnaistensuo * 201, 25,7536 60,9408 fi0324002 pes kallio * 68,2 25,6964 61,0269 fi0325001 evon alue * 7860, 25,1247 61,2286 fi0325002 ormaj rvi-untulanharju * 709, 24,9692 61,1006 fi0325006 letku-pappila-mattila * 35, 25,0464 61,0544 fi0325007 kaurastensuo-kantosuo * 77, 24,9833 61,0314 fi0325008 lamminj rvi-halila * 56, 25,0508 61,0767 fi0326001 per kulo * 26, 23,9294 61,3739 fi0327002 vojakkala * 97, 24,1625 60,7914 fi0327003 maakyl n-r ysk l n alue * 5861, 24,1275 60,7303 fi0327004 lopen isosuo * 138, 24,3603 60,6175 fi0327006 karjusuo * 66, 24,2967 60,7386 fi0327007 kyl ntaustanj rvet * 16, 24,1008 60,7836 fi0327008 mustinsuo * 69, 24,3728 60,6653 fi0328001 kuohijoen kalkkilehto * 12, 24,7783 61,3072 fi0328004 kukkiaj rvi 3892, 24,7017 61,3350 fi0328005 kurkisuo * 162, 24,8933 61,3925 fi0329001 sinivuori * 97, 24,7283 61,5750 fi0329002 hepoj rvi 3, 24,8142 61,7139 fi0331002 m nt nvuori * 284, 24,6556 62,0089 fi0333001 lapinvuori * 14, 23,2142 61,4208 fi0333003 luotosaari * 84, 23,4989 61,4353 fi0333004 kaakkurij rvet * 574, 23,4647 61,5175 fi0333006 p ll nvuori 24, 23,4211 61,4625 fi0334003 harjunvuori-viitapohja * 183, 24,1292 61,6506 fi0334004 kullanp * 28, 24,5417 61,6236 fi0335001 ammajanvuori * 183,3 25,1575 61,3042 fi0335003 p ij nne * 10857, 25,4439 61,3731 fi0335004 vesijako * 114, 25,1039 61,3511 fi0335006 auttoinen 4, 25,0919 61,2986 fi0335009 kasiniemen niityt * 4,5 24,9356 61,4267 fi0335010 jussilan keto * 0,7 25,0447 61,3508 fi0336001 isonkivenneva-marjakangas * 254, 23,2931 62,0533 fi0336002 n lk hittenkangas * 33, 23,0914 62,0867 fi0336003 rengassalo * 109, 22,8856 62,1192 fi0336004 h detkeidas * 2011, 22,7628 62,0461 fi0336005 kaidatvedet * 244, 23,0581 62,0678 fi0336006 puurokeidas-hannankeidas * 574, 22,6847 62,0247 fi0336007 raatosulkonneva * 31, 22,8539 62,1597 fi0336008 ahvenus * 12, 23,0831 62,0492 fi0337002 pulkaj rvi * 49, 23,6839 61,4206 fi0338003 im l * 76, 24,2133 61,3019 fi0338005 keini nranta * 27, 24,2533 61,3428 fi0339001 heinisuo * 391,9 24,3828 60,9039 fi0339004 seitsem nlamminsuo-korpilamminsuo * 572, 24,2944 60,9294 fi0339005 paloniitunj rvi 92, 24,3525 60,8153 fi0339007 lassilan keto * 0,5 24,0931 60,8200 fi0339008 metsola * 0,14 24,2656 60,9206 fi0339009 likolammi * 1,5 24,4108 60,8536 fi0341001 musturi * 59, 24,3742 61,8717 fi0341002 susim ki * 54, 24,2383 61,8592 fi0341003 helvetinj rvi * 5303, 23,8506 62,0242 fi0341004 roominnotko * 7, 24,0719 61,8578 fi0341008 siikaneva * 1300, 24,1514 61,8267 fi0341009 ruottaniitty-siikanotko * 9, 24,0631 61,8347 fi0341010 ilvesm ki l m nnevan mets * 45, 23,6919 62,0683 fi0341011 kolmikoura * 22, 24,4194 61,8989 fi0341012 kuivaj rven mets * 23, 24,2803 61,8531 fi0341015 temppeliharju * 18, 23,8192 61,9786 fi0341017 hanhonvuoren mets * 21, 24,2183 62,0025 fi0341018 likasenkoski * 1,3 24,3514 61,9264 fi0342001 l ngelm veden saaret * 407, 24,3989 61,5456 fi0344001 liesj rvi * 1803, 23,8608 60,6814 fi0344002 torronsuo * 3093, 23,6236 60,7375 fi0344003 kaukolanharju * 185, 23,8369 60,7769 fi0344007 saloistenj rvi-kyyn r j rvi * 525, 23,7711 60,9106 fi0344008 tervalamminsuo * 254,9 23,9811 60,6450 fi0345001 myllypuro 20, 23,5867 61,5092 fi0345004 iso-murron haat * 1, 24,0908 61,6536 fi0345005 kapeenlahden ranta * 2, 23,8350 61,8144 fi0346001 alhonlahti 8, 23,8239 61,2044 fi0347001 hevospierett m nm ki 3,3 24,8072 61,1039 fi0348002 kaakkosuo-kivij rvi * 655, 23,4361 60,9981 fi0348003 vuorenpyk l * 46, 23,4119 61,1822 fi0349001 pitk korpi * 17, 24,1308 61,2286 fi0349004 vainoniemi-rauttunrahka * 57, 23,9758 61,2031 fi0349006 tyk l nj rvi 173, 24,2047 61,2594 fi0349007 heikkil nmets * 16, 24,0281 61,2444 fi0349008 kuusistonk rki 13, 23,9986 61,2178 fi0350001 ekoj rvi * 232, 23,2047 61,3017 fi0350004 pirunvuori 35, 23,0433 61,3986 fi0350005 vehmaanniemi * 7,3 22,9653 61,3392 fi0351003 iso-hyyhynen * 31, 23,3244 61,2806 fi0351004 kirveslammi * 48, 23,6478 61,2089 fi0351005 marttilan rantaniitty * 2, 23,7025 61,2761 fi0351006 niinim en haka * 2, 23,2719 61,3469 fi0353002 ruonanjoki 13, 23,4317 61,6853 fi0354001 el m nm ki * 76, 24,3414 62,0711 fi0354002 lauttaj rvi * 122, 24,2236 62,2236 fi0354003 riihij rvi * 68, 24,2575 62,1750 fi0354004 tarjannevesi * 1208, 24,0500 62,1317 fi0355001 lakeisnevankangas * 23, 23,9353 62,3494 fi0355002 kituskoski * 35, 24,0317 62,2800 fi0355004 uurasj rvi * 500, 24,0197 62,2081 fi0355005 isoneva-kurjenmets * 188, 23,2800 62,3183 fi0355006 silm neva-silm lammi * 516, 23,4336 62,3283 fi0355007 n rhineva-koroluoma * 622, 23,3967 62,2125 fi0355008 haukkaneva * 2106, 23,5175 62,3883 fi0355011 korpij rven suo * 9, 23,9792 62,1811 fi0356001 perkonm ki * 24, 23,5578 61,5861 fi0356002 taaborinvuori * 60, 23,5214 61,6689 fi0356003 valkeekivi 10, 23,6686 61,5700 fi0356004 pinsi n-matalusjoki 27, 23,4342 61,5364 fi0356006 korpij rven haka * 0,6 23,4903 61,6797 fi0357002 yp j n hevoslaitumet * 63, 23,2997 60,8111 fi0358001 kilpikoski 16, 22,7592 61,3003 fi0358002 kiimaj rvi 146, 22,6964 61,3761 fi0358003 kilpijoen ranta 1, 22,7575 61,2925 fi0359001 v h -araj rvenpuro * 2, 23,6217 61,2011 fi0361001 mielas * 30,5 26,3128 61,3514 fi0361002 muurahaissaari * 25,3 26,3703 61,2053 fi0361003 m yr vuoren sepp l njoen mets t * 49,1 26,2972 61,3936 fi0362001 mallusjoen vanha mets * 21,8 25,6222 60,7264 fi0363001 p ij tsalo * 21, 25,5647 61,4808 fi0400001 l nsileton alue 2036, 26,9489 60,0847 fi0400002 luodematalat 4452, 26,9828 60,4575 fi0401001 kymijoki * 4250, 26,4525 60,4742 fi0401005 en suo * 395, 27,1703 60,8822 fi0401006 alajalansuo-hangassuo-haukkasuo-pilkkakorvenm ki * 726, 26,8903 60,8522 fi0401008 karhunsuo-hietakankaanniemi * 94, 27,0394 60,8386 fi0401009 mets koulun s st mets * 22, 26,9922 60,7536 fi0401010 junkkarinvuori 35, 26,7575 60,7028 fi0401011 liikkala 3, 27,0022 60,6756 fi0401012 rainionm ki ja sammalsuon pelto * 39, 26,8794 60,6983 fi0403002 hevoshaka, tompuri, salmenkyl , saunaniemi 5, 27,1800 60,5858 fi0403003 palanneenm ki * 38, 27,3158 60,6650 fi0404001 hiidensaari * 44, 26,4431 61,0094 fi0404002 kaalijoen, pyydysm en, kontojan ja saviojan taponlehtilehdot 40, 26,3361 60,7839 fi0404004 arrajoki * 12, 26,0514 60,9819 fi0404006 k rmesniemenkallio * 14, 26,1142 60,9525 fi0404007 kelloniemi * 229, 26,1861 61,1300 fi0404008 kukkom en mets * 15, 26,5025 60,9136 fi0404009 marjovuori * 115, 26,1700 61,0469 fi0404011 kullaan l hteet * 6, 26,0431 61,1050 fi0404012 sj grenin m ki * 2, 26,2292 60,9347 fi0406001 vuurttinsuo- korpij rvenoja * 89, 26,4772 61,2472 fi0406002 sokerim en letto 3, 26,5247 61,0531 fi0406003 pyh j rvi * 529, 26,4389 60,9408 fi0406004 niskaj rvi * 26, 26,5942 61,1525 fi0406007 tervaj rven rotko * 31, 26,4489 61,0686 fi0406008 mutiansaari * 31, 26,6322 61,1186 fi0406009 sepp l nkoski 0,7 26,5822 61,0411 fi0407001 ukonhaudat 84, 28,5772 61,1272 fi0407004 mielikonnotkon ja holmanjoen lehdot 6, 28,7406 61,0603 fi0407006 kivisaaren lehtokorpi 5, 28,4731 61,0281 fi0407008 muukonsaaren lehmusniemi * 4, 28,4858 61,1622 fi0407009 linnam ki * 221, 28,7131 61,0967 fi0407011 korpiahon laidun 3, 28,7508 61,0903 fi0407012 v st r kinm en niityt 7, 28,7311 61,1511 fi0407013 per -aholan niityt 2, 28,6872 61,1056 fi0408001 it isen suomenlahden saaristo ja vedet * 95628, 27,1233 60,2956 fi0408005 suurisuo-rajaj rvi 13, 26,9181 60,5794 fi0408009 vuorisaari 27, 27,0761 60,4119 fi0408010 klaavun rantaniitty * 1, 27,0050 60,5453 fi0408011 nummenjoen suu 28, 27,0094 60,5517 fi0409001 savonsuon tervalepikot * 30, 26,6850 60,8869 fi0409003 vahterm en kallionaluslehto * 15, 26,7111 60,8939 fi0410001 keltin ja ahkojan rantalehdot * 32, 26,5928 60,8553 fi0410002 tammirannan vanha ampumarata 2, 26,6097 60,8597 fi0411005 joussuo * 230, 28,3922 60,9214 fi0411006 luhtalammensuo * 42, 28,0678 61,0650 fi0411008 ruunakorpi * 29, 28,5719 60,9783 fi0411009 sudensalmen mets * 26, 28,2519 61,1069 fi0411012 vanha-mielon mets * 14, 28,2706 61,0339 fi0412001 suuvuori 9, 27,7492 61,0147 fi0413003 mustaksensuo * 82, 27,7847 60,8272 fi0413004 hietamiehen mets * 171, 27,3308 60,9442 fi0413005 someron l hteikk ja suo * 6, 27,4086 60,9211 fi0414005 suurisuo * 103, 27,8644 60,6575 fi0414006 tingankoskenm ki * 31, 27,6578 60,7403 fi0414008 leukaniemi-tyllinj rvi * 304, 27,7886 60,6611 fi0414009 vuorisenvuori 70, 27,8086 60,7131 fi0414010 mustalammen mets * 39, 27,4742 60,7933 fi0414012 riitahuusinpelto 3, 27,6614 60,7061 fi0414013 virojoki 0,6 27,5161 60,7472 fi0415002 ristim ki * 8, 29,4808 61,5311 fi0415004 korpisaaren mets * 15, 29,4597 61,6500 fi0415006 suurm ki 12, 29,6983 61,5828 fi0415007 siikalahti * 465, 29,5644 61,5636 fi0416001 valkmusa * 1710, 26,7394 60,5603 fi0416003 koukkusaari 180, 26,7300 60,4167 fi0416010 kokkovuori 121, 26,8089 60,4656 fi0417002 lautakangas * 21, 29,3281 61,3883 fi0417006 yhteismets n puisto * 9, 29,2875 61,3983 fi0417008 revonrannan laidun 4, 29,3653 61,4544 fi0417009 p tinkangas * 100, 29,1803 61,4119 fi0418006 haukkavuori * 119, 29,2200 61,4903 fi0418007 myllyjoki 1, 28,5769 61,4306 fi0419003 naattikumpu * 14, 29,7428 61,6619 fi0419004 kirjavalan laitumet * 5, 29,6617 61,6650 fi0419005 kanavalampi 21, 29,7908 61,6553 fi0420001 kuolimo * 8098, 27,5319 61,2667 fi0420004 vuohilammen mets * 40, 27,3664 61,1225 fi0420005 j rvitaipale * 365, 27,2172 61,1039 fi0422001 ilkonselk * 7417, 28,3169 61,2731 fi0422003 kuivaniemi * 43, 27,9803 61,1161 fi0422004 lilmanm ki * 32, 27,8350 61,1983 fi0422005 kyl niemi 460, 28,2844 61,3111 fi0423001 syrjiens rkk 129, 29,9097 61,7458 fi0423003 niukkala * 38, 29,8375 61,7478 fi0423006 suurtuvan niitty * 1, 29,8769 61,7458 fi0424001 repovesi * 4081, 26,8853 61,1867 fi0424002 sel np n-, anttilan- ja hevosojankangas * 760, 26,7694 61,0761 fi0424003 hirvenp nsuo * 137, 26,9075 61,1258 fi0424005 somuranm ki * 14, 26,8403 60,9578 fi0424006 vuohiniemen mets * 9, 27,0608 60,9947 fi0424008 hevosoja-k p l n letto * 2, 26,9508 61,0956 fi0424010 kartanonniemen mets * 7, 26,7714 60,9442 fi0424011 lappalanj rven lahdet ja kyt l nlampi 82, 26,7339 60,9233 fi0424012 matinlampi * 0,5 26,7772 61,2269 fi0424013 r ykynm ki * 8,5 26,8239 60,9444 fi0425003 rajasuo * 278, 27,3514 60,5903 fi0425005 pappilansaari-lupinlahti * 400, 27,2439 60,5428 fi0425006 suviranta * 54, 27,1961 60,5403 fi0425007 sikovuori 72, 27,1278 60,6436 fi0425009 korkiavuori * 35, 27,1528 60,6994 fi0426003 saunasuon mets * 13, 27,5231 60,6128 fi0426004 vilkkil 22, 27,7036 60,5175 fi0426005 hinkkaj rvi 3,8 27,5239 69,5117 fi0427001 j rvenp nsuo-hangassaari * 158, 27,8786 60,8022 fi0427002 kaaliaiskorvenvuori * 48, 27,8828 60,7153 fi0427003 mustatkalliot * 95, 27,9083 60,7419 fi0500001 kolovesi vaaluvirta pyttyselk * 7986, 28,7981 62,2608 fi0500002 linnansaari * 26546, 28,4453 62,1244 fi0500003 hartolan isosuo * 99, 26,2953 61,5992 fi0500004 vuotsinsuo * 440, 27,8728 62,0983 fi0500005 iso-huppio * 917, 27,5036 61,9286 fi0500006 juurikkasuo vehka- ja uuhilampi * 195, 27,0875 62,3222 fi0500007 paltasuo * 211, 26,9425 62,3050 fi0500008 ringinsuo hein lamminsuo * 276, 27,0672 62,4014 fi0500009 petkellammensuo * 166, 27,3794 62,0328 fi0500010 kakonsalon j rvialue * 2412, 28,9928 62,2633 fi0500011 kermaj rvi * 6154, 28,7258 62,4536 fi0500012 kuij rvi sonnanen * 2330, 26,4281 61,2839 fi0500013 pihlajavesi * 36737, 28,8714 61,7394 fi0500014 lammasniemen lehto * 11, 27,4842 62,4611 fi0500015 j ppil n ja joroisten vanhat mets t * 384, 27,6814 62,3131 fi0500016 sulkavan ja punkaharjun vanhat mets t * 416, 28,7972 61,5533 fi0500018 suurenaukeansuo isosuo pohjalampi * 1640, 27,0578 62,1742 fi0500019 punkaharju * 679, 29,3306 61,7817 fi0500020 hirvensalmen suurisuo * 98, 26,8844 61,5608 fi0500021 luonteri * 8441, 27,8450 61,6222 fi0500022 pyssyharju 118, 26,0019 61,1761 fi0500023 tervaruukinsalo * 826, 27,6356 62,2636 fi0500024 lietvesi * 19271, 27,9925 61,4556 fi0500025 puulavesi * 16546, 26,6872 61,7986 fi0500026 katosselk tolvanselk * 13288, 28,5481 61,6258 fi0500029 puumalan suurisuo * 91, 28,2247 61,4350 fi0500030 vahvasel n vahvaj rven mets t * 53, 26,5931 61,6208 fi0500031 joutenvesi pyyvesi * 15292, 28,7406 62,1614 fi0500033 kotisalon lehto 21, 26,0903 61,5736 fi0500035 puruvesi 31 963,4 29,5350 61,9061 fi0500036 suurlahden lampialue * 568, 27,6958 61,4547 fi0500038 putkilahti ruskeaper * 698, 28,3989 61,9919 fi0500042 hujas 44, 27,3289 61,7572 fi0500043 niitlahti * 86, 29,2242 61,8261 fi0500046 sysm n lintuvedet 288, 25,6917 61,5206 fi0500047 tuhkaa * 55, 26,9683 62,1078 fi0500048 maijootsuo * 42, 27,3931 62,4483 fi0500049 m ntyharjun suursuo * 61, 27,1086 61,3756 fi0500052 ruhvanansuo * 135, 29,0353 61,9697 fi0500053 iso-kylm * 91, 26,7739 62,2325 fi0500056 py rissalo * 140, 29,0356 61,9200 fi0500057 l pi n koivikkolehdot 11, 26,0869 61,1469 fi0500058 kyr nsuo 21, 28,5086 62,3633 fi0500060 m ntyharjun reitin kosket * 37, 26,7094 61,5658 fi0500062 kotkatharju 144, 27,8817 62,1958 fi0500063 viitoinvuoren lehto 2, 29,1139 61,9525 fi0500065 kammiovuori * 237, 25,6889 61,6700 fi0500066 mataraniemi m yr m ki * 36, 26,1403 61,1958 fi0500068 heinolanm en lehto * 13, 28,5992 62,4114 fi0500073 kinaneva * 64, 26,7025 62,1283 fi0500074 savonsuo * 158, 29,1336 61,9056 fi0500077 pahalamminvuori * 57, 27,3331 61,6389 fi0500081 haapasaari luhtanen majaluhta * 60, 26,7425 61,3664 fi0500082 lautj rvi laukkala kaituenlampi * 93, 26,3378 61,5303 fi0500084 sielusenm ki * 16, 28,0828 61,6239 fi0500086 m yr vuoren vanha mets * 85, 25,9753 61,3194 fi0500087 linnusvuoren vanhat mets t * 82, 26,0581 61,3422 fi0500088 viitam en vaanilan mets t * 23, 25,9333 61,6100 fi0500089 arola * 32, 26,2636 61,1650 fi0500092 heponiemen mets t * 51, 26,1856 61,1994 fi0500093 hanhilampi * 29, 27,2533 61,7008 fi0500094 launinsuo * 107, 27,1281 61,7975 fi0500096 t rm * 16, 27,1683 62,2678 fi0500097 uhnionm enrinne * 6, 26,7442 62,3489 fi0500099 vilkaharju 160, 28,4219 61,7886 fi0500104 haapaniemi * 13, 27,1086 62,0908 fi0500105 uuhiniemi * 47, 25,9406 61,6844 fi0500106 imj rven salonm en mets t * 55, 26,2425 61,2658 fi0500108 pyh niemi * 58, 26,6989 61,4436 fi0500109 kinalammen mets * 21, 26,7825 61,4175 fi0500111 ruokolahden mets * 14, 28,5722 61,6758 fi0500113 koiravuoren mets t * 40, 27,5408 61,7994 fi0500114 kihtelysniemi * 26, 26,6269 61,3231 fi0500115 laukoniemi * 33, 26,7450 61,4522 fi0500116 hirvij rvenkallio vastam ki * 74, 25,6933 61,3611 fi0500128 juustinm ki * 32, 25,8628 61,7156 fi0500129 lahnaniemen, solistonsuon ja alatalon mets t * 38, 26,6300 61,4900 fi0500130 anettu * 26, 26,4225 61,4092 fi0500131 tornioniemi * 47, 28,1983 62,1164 fi0500133 anttilan tila * 42, 27,5911 61,6419 fi0500135 paason niityt * 1, 26,2539 61,3586 fi0500137 pet isen mets * 22, 26,8733 61,9453 fi0500138 rautvuori * 11, 26,0806 61,2650 fi0500140 lautalammen mets * 29, 29,1172 61,8706 fi0500143 lamminpohja * 86, 27,8631 62,1556 fi0500144 hertunj rven mets t * 13, 27,5975 61,4772 fi0500145 pohjoislampi 23, 27,0133 61,7075 fi0500149 kolmikanta * 42, 27,1992 61,2017 fi0500154 puruveden valkoselk tikkamets t * 42, 29,2903 61,9814 fi0500155 lehmilammen lehdot * 10, 28,6481 61,9572 fi0500156 v nkk nsuo * 115, 26,8692 61,7914 fi0500158 pohjolan laidun * 6, 27,4747 61,5875 fi0500161 rastikenkut * 22, 29,0475 62,1842 fi0500162 lepp kosken mets t * 5, 25,8886 61,6442 fi0500163 vitsaj rvien vanha mets * 16, 26,0364 61,3306 fi0500164 sahinsuo * 166, 26,5506 61,5928 fi0500165 isosuo kivenholma * 226, 26,4072 61,6172 fi0500166 kakrialansuo * 140, 26,8872 61,8631 fi0500169 vilkonsuo * 79, 29,4447 61,9594 fi0500170 kinnula * 1, 29,1003 61,8644 fi0500171 hevonniemi * 6510, 28,7428 61,9422 fi0500172 vaahersalonlampi * 149, 28,4764 62,0361 fi0500175 ahvenj rven haka 5, 26,4439 61,5450 fi0500176 kyyvesi (sci) * 7144, 27,0869 61,9775 fi0500201 taloahon mets * 12, 27,1342 61,9022 fi0500202 rossinlammen mets * 11, 27,1083 61,2886 fi0500203 viljakkalan mets t * 86, 26,8467 61,8403 fi0500204 rutkanlahden mets t * 35, 28,2958 61,7467 fi0500205 sammakkolammen mets * 21, 26,7672 61,3844 fi0500206 puolihongansuon mets * 22, 28,1486 62,2772 fi0500211 patterinm ki * 27, 28,9292 61,6067 fi0500220 kukkosenkorpi * 5, 28,2722 61,7350 fi0500221 ritasuo onttoinvuorensuo * 15, 27,3392 61,6278 fi0500222 mesi nlammen letot 1, 26,3386 62,1117 fi0500230 sulkavanniemen laidun ja niitty * 3, 29,0547 61,9794 fi0500231 haapalahden niitty * 0,4 28,0903 62,0861 fi0500236 haapalahden ranta 3,4 28,0844 62,0933 fi0600001 puijo * 171, 27,6636 62,9083 fi0600002 etel -kuopion lehdot ja lammet, vanuvuori, haminavuori * 315, 27,6283 62,8042 fi0600003 paas- ja puruveden suot ja mets t * 117, 27,3314 62,4986 fi0600004 suuri-majoisen mets * 23, 28,0108 62,9258 fi0600005 hirvij rven lehto 5, 26,6883 63,3864 fi0600006 hiidenj rven lehto 9, 28,2575 62,8500 fi0600007 halmejoki-karhonsaari-potkunsaari * 23, 27,7386 62,9575 fi0600008 jynk nj rven ja putousnotkon lehdot 11, 26,6897 63,5219 fi0600009 juurikkasel n mets * 56, 27,7650 62,6242 fi0600010 vaikkojoki, vaikon vanhat mets t ja aitalamminsuo * 258, 28,8333 63,0839 fi0600011 iso siimarinm ki * 49, 26,5475 62,5358 fi0600012 yl -keyrityn mets t ja keyritynjoki * 355, 28,5122 63,5303 fi0600013 laakaj rven mets t ja suot sek suurisuo * 268, 27,7469 63,8781 fi0600014 vahtisuo ja l hist n vanhat mets t * 440, 27,5761 63,8558 fi0600015 keurunm ki-haavikkolehto * 625, 26,9294 62,5325 fi0600016 kurkivuori-rimminluhta-sikosalmi * 91, 27,0253 62,5786 fi0600018 saarisuo-kurkisuo * 695, 26,6386 63,9411 fi0600019 mammonhauta-rotimojoki * 40, 26,8594 63,9244 fi0600020 pumpulikirkko * 1686, 28,4881 63,6317 fi0600021 niinivaaran serpentiniittialueet * 89, 28,8269 63,0031 fi0600022 rahkasuo * 10, 27,2575 62,8914 fi0600023 pangansuo * 97, 26,9144 63,1506 fi0600024 valkeiskyl n ja ventojoen mets t * 78, 26,7969 63,4061 fi0600025 hetteinen ja liimattalanharju * 42, 26,7228 62,6756 fi0600026 matalasuo-hyv ril nsuo * 810, 28,5189 63,4594 fi0600027 autiosuo ja uuranholi * 324, 27,9964 63,7197 fi0600028 suvasveden saaristot * 8539, 28,1706 62,6242 fi0600029 kutujoki 16, 27,0697 62,5336 fi0600030 sorsaveden saaristo * 5179, 27,5361 62,4772 fi0600031 juoj rven saaristo * 3299, 28,5881 62,7303 fi0600032 konnevesi-kalaja-niinivuori * 15 259,3 26,5575 62,5994 fi0600033 h ll m nharju-valkeiskangas * 1406, 26,7286 63,9944 fi0600034 l ytynsuon-maamonsuon alue * 2386, 28,4103 63,6322 fi0600035 korkeakoski * 29, 27,0739 63,2400 fi0600036 keski-kallaveden saaristo * 4378, 27,8239 62,7961 fi0600039 lintharju-kirjosuo sek vakkarsuo * 1035, 27,0225 62,6456 fi0600040 honkam ki * 138, 27,1061 62,9564 fi0600042 valkeinen 70, 27,3939 63,1083 fi0600043 l hem en mets * 21, 28,2517 62,9308 fi0600049 kinahmin rinteen lehdot 9, 27,9981 63,1894 fi0600057 huutavanholma * 43, 28,0192 63,2817 fi0600059 korsum ki kein l nniemi * 106, 27,5836 62,8081 fi0600060 tavisuo * 254, 27,4058 63,9608 fi0600061 toussunlinna * 19, 26,7856 62,5467 fi0600062 kolmisoppi-neulam ki * 426, 27,5897 62,8814 fi0600063 laivonsaari * 147, 27,5858 62,9275 fi0600066 jurvasenpuron mets * 57, 28,6325 63,0717 fi0600067 kolmisoppisen suot * 329, 28,0319 63,5611 fi0600068 l nne * 3152, 28,1167 63,4911 fi0600069 naimapuron mets * 71, 27,1250 63,9281 fi0600070 koivujoki 24, 26,3628 63,4106 fi0600071 tiilikan alue * 4911, 28,2928 63,6500 fi0600072 kuikkasuo ja suurisuo * 118, 27,6656 63,3222 fi0600073 toukkasuo-huttusuo * 221, 26,2783 63,5700 fi0600075 hirvisuo * 137, 27,7708 63,2592 fi0600076 pisa-kyp r inen * 476, 28,3144 63,2242 fi0600077 eitikansalon suot * 223, 27,8867 63,2553 fi0600078 loutteisen-kuikkasuon-tarpisen alue * 51, 28,0067 63,2303 fi0600079 ruohosuo * 41, 28,5917 63,0917 fi0600080 turulanvaara * 69, 28,7994 62,9117 fi0600081 kakkisenj rven alue * 441, 27,2425 62,7414 fi0600082 hukkasuo * 256, 27,5286 63,4436 fi0600084 kutunjoki * 87, 27,4156 62,5994 fi0600086 savuniemi ja kipansalo * 108, 28,1369 62,8906 fi0600087 hangassuo-karjalaisenm ki * 221, 27,8556 63,3253 fi0600088 kitkukallio 2, 27,8767 63,0336 fi0600089 telkk m ki * 103, 28,4794 63,0378 fi0600096 kaavinj rven mets * 72, 28,5664 62,8906 fi0600099 kanervaharjun mets * 38, 27,4725 63,3031 fi0600101 koistilan mets * 84, 28,3794 62,7717 fi0600102 m kr m en mets * 38, 27,4739 62,6022 fi0600103 suojoen mets * 43, 26,6925 63,8631 fi0600104 humalasuo * 47, 26,3442 62,9531 fi0600105 joutensuo * 74, 26,8175 63,8939 fi0600106 selk suo * 168, 27,1283 63,8536 fi0600107 vuori-kalajan letto * 3, 26,7053 62,5856 fi0600108 haravalehto * 13, 28,5994 63,5819 fi0600109 hirvivaara * 15, 28,7203 63,3211 fi0600110 pitk suo s rk ntakanen * 203, 28,3792 63,7267 fi0600111 pieni mustansel n mets * 41, 27,8181 63,5153 fi0600112 maasel nm ki * 1,3 27,2458 62,9039 fi0600113 hyppyypuronsuo * 7,2 27,1308 63,8222 fi0600114 patalahti-pataj rvi 5,3 27,1842 63,2222 fi0700004 v rtsil n laakson luontokokonaisuus * 212, 30,6317 62,2122 fi0700010 kolin kansallispuisto * 2 717,5 29,8250 63,0853 fi0700011 kesonsuo palokangas-selk kangas syv ysjoki * 8 764,76 30,8361 62,8386 fi0700012 polvelan luontokokonaisuus * 406, 29,0758 63,1544 fi0700013 petrovaaran luontokokonaisuus * 75, 28,9839 63,1628 fi0700014 savij rven suo * 28, 29,6725 63,0972 fi0700015 h rkinpuro ja serpentiiniraunioisalueet * 65, 29,5267 63,1250 fi0700017 munakukkula-niinivaara * 181,2 29,5594 62,6644 fi0700018 oriveden-pyh sel n saaristot * 15938, 29,7064 62,4189 fi0700019 kalliolammen mets * 65, 30,3661 62,7164 fi0700020 iknonvaara * 81, 30,3967 63,4844 fi0700021 huurunlampi-sammakkolampi huurunrinne * 258, 29,8475 63,0358 fi0700022 korvinsuo-parilamminsuo * 661, 30,9114 62,7631 fi0700023 kolvanauuro ja l hialueet * 194,7 29,9747 62,8611 fi0700028 reposuo-kalliolahdensuo * 910, 30,2186 63,3333 fi0700029 puohtiinsuo * 891, 31,0967 62,7161 fi0700030 s rkij rvi 66, 29,2953 62,6453 fi0700031 hiidensaari-valkolansaari 11, 30,2197 62,0889 fi0700032 hanhisuo * 122, 29,0989 62,9489 fi0700033 valkeaj rven harjualue * 519, 31,1275 62,8683 fi0700034 sopensuo * 37, 30,1050 62,1006 fi0700035 huuhkajanvaara * 55, 29,9164 62,9747 fi0700036 hopealahden mets * 19, 29,8422 62,4806 fi0700037 lammassaari-yppyl * 253, 30,7525 62,9478 fi0700038 tohmaj rven lehdot * 37, 30,3150 62,2086 fi0700039 marjoniemenkangas * 579, 29,7914 61,8006 fi0700040 akankangas * 32, 29,7544 62,2947 fi0700041 papinniemen ukonhattulehto 5, 29,9786 62,0225 fi0700042 viitasuo * 628, 30,6417 62,8197 fi0700043 koitajoen alue * 7561, 31,4419 62,9275 fi0700044 petkelj rvi-putkelanharju * 3417, 31,0889 62,6347 fi0700045 ruunaa * 11978, 30,5928 63,4003 fi0700046 mujej rvi * 2333, 29,5450 63,7833 fi0700047 patvinsuo * 12727, 30,7361 63,1117 fi0700048 rasvasuo-kitkasuo cajanderin aarnialue * 1901, 29,9800 63,6406 fi0700049 hirvisuo * 348, 30,2067 62,2464 fi0700050 viklinrimpi * 1459, 29,5014 62,9167 fi0700051 kirjovaara * 328, 30,3994 62,8606 fi0700052 juuan vanhat mets t * 527, 28,9083 63,3011 fi0700053 raes rkk * 720, 28,7700 63,4811 fi0700054 oinasvaara * 20, 30,5408 63,0500 fi0700055 vaikkojoen suot * 473, 28,8253 63,2503 fi0700056 ukons rk n alueen vanhat mets t * 752, 30,7747 63,3392 fi0700057 j k l kangas * 224, 30,7333 63,2747 fi0700058 jongunjoki * 338, 29,8617 63,7233 fi0700059 p ntt vaara-pahkavaara * 410, 30,9897 63,1614 fi0700060 lieksan it rajan vanhat mets t * 631, 31,0539 63,2683 fi0700061 ritos rk n alueen vanhat mets t * 494, 30,4403 63,2028 fi0700063 tolkeenvaaran alueen vanhat mets t * 251, 29,7597 63,6492 fi0700064 korkea-aho viharinj rvi * 207, 30,0781 63,6842 fi0700065 murtovaaran alueen vanhat mets t * 749, 28,7886 63,8328 fi0700066 piilopirtinaho-marjom ki * 555, 28,4522 63,7631 fi0700067 mustinvaaran alueen vanhat mets t * 300, 29,6489 63,6897 fi0700068 paistinvaaran alueen vanhat mets t * 553, 29,2442 63,8172 fi0700069 leivisk nkalliot * 111, 28,8542 63,4272 fi0700070 luostarinvaaransuo * 260, 30,4958 62,5106 fi0700071 partiissuo * 295, 29,9925 62,1906 fi0700072 sammalussuo * 289, 30,2664 62,8036 fi0700073 iso-vetel inen * 6, 29,7558 63,0875 fi0700074 verkkovaara * 149,6 29,7803 63,0681 fi0700075 p ll nvaara-kruununkangas * 537, 29,9458 62,6622 fi0700076 karjalans rkk -seiv slammins rkk * 104, 29,7442 62,0086 fi0700077 jukavaara-s rkilamminvaara * 285, 30,1367 62,5247 fi0700078 jouhteninen * 174, 29,7558 62,7894 fi0700079 p vaara * 104, 29,8169 63,5619 fi0700080 sinivaara-massivaara * 204, 30,3372 63,4533 fi0700081 kuoppasuo * 162, 29,1711 63,7700 fi0700082 piilosens rk t * 257, 30,2106 63,4961 fi0700083 iso-juurikan leve vaaran alue * 397, 29,1303 62,6922 fi0700084 multas rkk -likolamminkangas * 924, 30,3867 62,2908 fi0700085 kannusvaara * 296, 30,2269 62,4061 fi0700088 otravaaran ngelm lehto 1, 30,1233 61,8914 fi0700089 kuorinka 1301, 29,4033 62,6114 fi0700090 onkamon s rkij rvi 1070, 30,0742 62,3408 fi0700091 pyh j rven alueen luontokokonaisuus * 20544, 29,8967 61,8569 fi0700093 peijonniemenlahden vesialue 119,6 30,4003 62,1969 fi0700094 jorhonkorpi * 38,5 31,1311 62,9344 fi0700095 sulkukorpi * 15, 30,9053 62,9367 fi0700097 ritoniemen mets * 66,8 29,2819 63,2728 fi0700098 kuolemalammen suo * 62,5 29,7233 61,7992 fi0700100 paiholan mets * 75,9 29,9700 62,6247 fi0700102 sammakkovaara * 20,4 29,2558 63,7156 fi0700103 heraj rven mets * 100,8 30,6831 62,5667 fi0700106 piilovaaran mets t * 6,3 29,1347 63,3261 fi0700107 noljakanm en alue * 50,2 29,6856 62,6172 fi0700108 kalmistolan haka 3, 30,2253 62,0719 fi0700109 koikkalanm en rinnelaitumet * 2,1 30,1761 62,0761 fi0700110 kansikkopuro * 5,7 29,2050 63,6447 fi0700111 puustinvaara * 2,5 30,8344 62,6108 fi0700113 lehtovaara * 18,3 29,0050 63,0594 fi0700115 makonniemi * 15,1 30,0158 62,0339 fi0700116 soikkelin mets * 20,8 29,6389 62,6739 fi0700117 koskutkangas * 195,4 30,8667 63,2239 fi0700118 kuikkasuo * 86, 30,9192 63,3494 fi0700119 s rkk lammit * 91,1 29,8414 63,5431 fi0700125 v likankaan alueen vanhat mets t * 375,7 29,2842 63,8456 fi0700126 p iv rinne * 11,3 29,4522 63,6739 fi0700128 kansikkovaara * 31,9 29,0875 63,8203 fi0700129 pyk l kangas * 12,9 28,5986 63,7194 fi0700130 simanaisenlehto * 19,2 28,7061 63,8186 fi0700131 syv lampien alue * 63,3 28,7372 63,8461 fi0700132 haukisuo * 32,9 29,0439 63,1964 fi0700134 salmij rvi * 150,8 29,5736 63,6494 fi0700135 liippalammit * 185, 29,6225 63,7014 fi0700136 ristinvaara * 57,7 29,5917 63,7394 fi0700137 purtovaara * 78,3 29,6281 63,6542 fi0700138 s rkilamminkangas * 101,4 29,8056 63,6394 fi0700139 suolamminvaara-tervasuo * 382, 30,8025 63,3042 fi0700140 v r kangas * 25,2 29,7808 63,6844 fi0700141 jysm nvaara * 16,9 28,6433 63,8283 fi0700142 kyp r vaara * 75,4 29,3550 63,8078 fi0700143 kuomavaara * 48,7 29,3581 63,7733 fi0700145 sihvonvaaran mets t * 33,4 29,5261 63,7000 fi0700146 hein vaaran-kyyk n lammet 2,9 29,9811 62,8364 fi0700147 kangasvaaran-kenraalinkyl n lammet 15, 30,7336 62,3014 fi0700148 p tye-sep nniemi 12, 30,1339 62,1094 fi0800001 lauhanvuori * 4992, 22,1586 62,1450 fi0800003 kauhaneva pohjankangas (sci) * 6 849,2 22,4203 62,1831 fi0800010 mustasaarenneva * 724, 22,6194 62,3339 fi0800012 pohjoisneva * 2341, 24,3131 63,0833 fi0800013 harjaisneva-pilkoonneva * 691, 21,7625 62,5847 fi0800014 lutakkoneva * 455, 21,8342 62,4006 fi0800015 varisneva * 278, 21,6583 62,5400 fi0800016 kurpanneva * 395, 21,9656 62,6069 fi0800017 iso kakkurinneva * 180, 21,8289 62,7047 fi0800018 kackurmossen * 760, 21,4056 62,7753 fi0800019 degermossen * 508, 21,2803 62,7569 fi0800020 risn smossen * 727, 21,4344 62,6753 fi0800021 sanemossen * 1053, 21,6981 62,7561 fi0800022 norrskogenin suot * 95, 22,1083 63,2161 fi0800023 norrmossen * 199, 22,5592 63,1675 fi0800024 viitaneva-storholmanneva * 347, 22,6675 63,1736 fi0800025 paljakanneva- kantmossen * 1218, 22,5892 63,2667 fi0800026 hanhikeidas * 934, 21,7850 62,1433 fi0800027 larvanneva * 848, 23,3297 62,6828 fi0800028 pirjatanneva * 606, 23,3456 62,4242 fi0800030 haukilamminneva * 1061, 23,1417 62,3697 fi0800032 levaneva * 3343, 22,0922 62,7781 fi0800033 iso kaivoneva * 584, 22,0000 62,2831 fi0800034 iso koihnanneva * 1390, 22,4722 62,3494 fi0800035 paukaneva * 583, 22,8647 62,8292 fi0800036 maaherransuo * 418, 24,5028 62,5853 fi0800037 niinineva * 74, 23,9647 62,3969 fi0800038 matosuo * 838, 24,2892 62,8119 fi0800039 vanhaneva * 334, 23,5133 63,0792 fi0800041 ruokkaanneva * 323, 24,0386 63,2328 fi0800042 iso narunneva * 275, 23,6556 62,9147 fi0800044 mesmossen * 675, 22,7083 63,4586 fi0800045 angj rvmossen * 134, 23,1378 63,5281 fi0800046 passmossen * 244, 23,1697 63,5881 fi0800047 pitk m nnik nneva * 79, 24,0364 62,8781 fi0800050 ylimysj rvi * 125, 22,3806 62,3197 fi0800052 h ll rsfj rden * 313, 22,9161 63,7219 fi0800054 petolahdenjokisuisto * 543, 21,3883 62,8797 fi0800056 vassorfj rden * 1537, 21,9964 63,2100 fi0800057 s dra stadsfj rden-s derfj rden- jen * 2855, 21,5775 63,0075 fi0800059 hinj rvi * 420, 21,3344 62,6853 fi0800060 kuivasj rvi * 468, 23,5042 62,5792 fi0800064 lapuanjokisuisto-b daviken * 610, 22,4853 63,5750 fi0800065 sappionj rvet * 307, 24,0131 62,6122 fi0800067 sandsundsfj rden * 159, 22,7708 63,6456 fi0800070 p ssil nvuori * 239, 22,1772 62,7450 fi0800071 huosianmaankallio * 38, 24,0725 63,1719 fi0800077 pyh vuori * 126, 21,6286 62,2711 fi0800079 pitk m nluoma 24, 22,4203 62,5917 fi0800082 simpsi * 51, 22,9475 62,9503 fi0800084 orrmossliden * 26, 21,5658 62,5300 fi0800085 bredmossmyran * 27, 21,4450 62,3758 fi0800086 l gpelt * 21, 22,1603 63,1308 fi0800087 per nevanholma * 506, 23,2117 62,7911 fi0800089 miilu * 13, 24,1267 62,5711 fi0800091 k rmekalliot * 66, 24,0314 63,0919 fi0800092 lassinharju * 67, 21,9431 62,1658 fi0800093 gamla kastet * 39, 22,1067 63,3275 fi0800095 iskmo n * 236, 21,5939 63,2303 fi0800096 sidl ndet * 507, 21,7767 63,1917 fi0800097 vedahugget * 40, 21,7800 63,1228 fi0800098 djuplottbacken * 43, 23,3653 63,5181 fi0800099 f n snabban * 28, 22,8092 63,6722 fi0800100 m ntykangas * 53, 24,2336 62,9458 fi0800101 p ssinr m kk * 60, 22,0861 62,5886 fi0800103 n ttypii * 38, 22,5075 62,8467 fi0800104 m kel nm ki * 58, 24,2372 62,5706 fi0800105 per mets * 38, 21,9325 63,0406 fi0800106 lummukkakangas * 62, 23,3786 63,1208 fi0800107 kalomskogen * 66, 22,4128 63,1306 fi0800110 ht v njoki 57,82 23,1536 63,5564 fi0800111 lapv rtinjokilaakso * 233,67 146,44 21,7136 62,2519 fi0800112 lapv rtin kosteikot * 1224, 21,4381 62,1847 fi0800120 ison koiraj rven harju * 343, 24,3714 62,6983 fi0800130 merenkurkun saaristo * 128162, 21,3856 63,3842 fi0800132 luodon saaristo * 14460, 22,6142 63,8328 fi0800133 uudenkaarlepyyn saaristo * 3210, 22,4014 63,6222 fi0800134 kristiinankaupungin saaristo * 8059, 21,3111 62,2414 fi0800135 n rpi n saaristo * 11828, 21,0906 62,5142 fi0800136 kokkolan saaristo (sci) * 12645, 23,0642 63,9392 fi0800140 tegelbruksbacken * 47, 21,4044 62,2831 fi0800141 bryms ren * 21, 22,3714 63,5181 fi0800142 furubacken * 18,9 21,7728 62,9811 fi0800143 gubbtr skberget * 21, 22,8042 63,6647 fi0800144 igeltr sket * 26, 21,8719 63,2389 fi0800145 isokorpi * 13,6 22,0883 62,6525 fi0800146 j rvinevan mets * 11, 22,8658 62,8769 fi0800147 kaijan kryytimaa * 12, 21,9231 62,7953 fi0800148 kivist nm ki * 21,7 22,6661 62,8517 fi0800150 matosuonniemi * 32, 24,2536 62,7728 fi0800151 mets kyl n mets * 12, 21,8450 62,7278 fi0800152 n rrtr skin mets * 20,9 22,1575 63,2192 fi0800153 pelman mets * 12, 22,4822 62,8622 fi0800154 pohjoislahden mets * 82, 21,3897 62,2861 fi0800155 porraslamminkangas * 13, 24,7900 63,4142 fi0800156 p kk saaret * 20, 23,0081 63,3369 fi0800157 kajaneskogen * 47, 21,6189 62,7864 fi0800158 tuoresluoman lehdot * 16,6 22,6192 62,6808 fi0800159 ukonm ki * 53,2 23,8386 62,9386 fi0800160 ngesholmen * 54,3 21,3044 63,1606 fi0800161 hirvijoen mets t * 76, 23,2711 63,0914 fi0900001 lotakonsuo * 7,6 25,5431 62,5147 fi0900002 oksalan isosuo miehink isensuo * 109, 25,2067 62,5061 fi0900003 kanavuori-koskenvuori * 162, 25,9022 62,2397 fi0900004 verhokangas * 69, 24,8117 62,9392 fi0900005 aittosuo-lepp suo-uitusharju * 1521, 24,5683 62,7508 fi0900006 h rk suo-hongistonkorpi * 24, 25,6758 62,1928 fi0900007 alasuo * 14,3 26,1169 62,2844 fi0900008 sallistensuo * 69,1 25,3014 62,3697 fi0900009 v r p n lammet ja l hteet * 21, 25,5339 62,3608 fi0900010 yl -tankonen * 17, 26,0742 62,5736 fi0900011 hitonhauta-kylm hauta-hirvasjoki * 132, 25,7422 62,4928 fi0900012 lankamaan harjualue * 121, 26,1758 62,4619 fi0900013 hietasyrj nkangas-sirkkaharju 378, 25,9878 62,4992 fi0900014 partastenm et * 26, 25,6917 62,1650 fi0900015 jurvon alue jouhtisen mets * 452, 25,9408 62,6053 fi0900016 peuravuori-hoikanvuori 26, 25,9653 62,7139 fi0900017 julmatlammit-kitukorpi * 89, 25,1344 62,7686 fi0900018 vanginvesi 307, 26,2153 62,5592 fi0900019 k lk suo-lehmusuo * 186, 26,3247 61,8981 fi0900020 harvastensuo * 98, 26,0864 61,8300 fi0900021 hyypp n alue * 28,9 26,1361 62,2936 fi0900022 ylist nrinne kylm noron kalliot 15, 25,7403 62,2281 fi0900023 muuramenharju innanlahden lehto * 228, 25,6375 62,1072 fi0900024 humalalahti pitk joen suu * 83, 26,0117 62,1278 fi0900025 saarij rven reitti * 1534, 24,9975 62,7769 fi0900026 kyt murronsuo * 12, 26,3408 62,6703 fi0900027 pyh j rvi 1935, 25,4778 62,7389 fi0900028 hitonhaudan vuori * 41, 26,0708 62,6769 fi0900029 huhkoj rvi * 151, 24,8328 62,1289 fi0900030 hirvij rvi * 60, 24,5144 62,4978 fi0900031 peuralamminneva * 487, 24,4708 63,0911 fi0900032 pihlajaveden reitti 615, 24,1561 62,3331 fi0900033 eerolanlahti-rautpohjanlahti 43, 25,7222 62,2525 fi0900034 silppolanraivio-aittosuonlehto * 127, 24,9961 63,2056 fi0900035 keiteleen listonniemi * 1606, 26,0800 62,8708 fi0900036 isol hteenpuro * 6, 25,3236 62,9325 fi0900037 siipikangas * 18, 24,4964 62,3600 fi0900038 pieni-kaihlanen * 71, 26,3442 62,2656 fi0900039 vaarunvuoret * 604, 25,7161 61,9294 fi0900040 suoj rviensuo-niittosuo * 524, 25,9647 63,2958 fi0900041 keskisenlampi-riionlampi * 102, 26,3103 61,8506 fi0900042 koivulahti 1, 24,6758 62,4144 fi0900043 saarisuo-valleussuo-l yt suo-hirvilampi * 1515, 24,4419 62,9844 fi0900044 syv j rvenlehto * 36, 25,3558 63,5744 fi0900045 housukosken alue * 232, 24,6831 62,4906 fi0900046 hein -suvanto hetej rvi * 1224, 26,1456 63,1519 fi0900047 karjovuori * 33, 24,6897 62,3800 fi0900049 hopeaharjunkorpi * 25, 24,9592 61,5317 fi0900050 raiskin mets t * 112, 24,2878 62,2867 fi0900051 s rkij rvi ja iso mets lampi * 111, 24,7608 62,8142 fi0900052 nytkymenj rvi * 483, 24,9364 61,8567 fi0900053 rasuanniemi 18, 25,1347 61,9517 fi0900054 jylh nrinteen mets * 8, 24,8914 62,6556 fi0900055 laihistenneva-h rk neva-vahvasenjoki * 493, 24,4639 62,7983 fi0900056 makkaran niitty 4, 25,5969 63,4697 fi0900057 sel ntauksen suot * 2714, 25,2861 63,3294 fi0900058 suurisuo-sep nsuo-paanasenneva-teerineva * 844, 25,4969 63,5008 fi0900059 kalaj rvi-kyt nneva * 209, 26,1178 62,6481 fi0900060 kyl m n lammet * 68, 25,0458 61,6164 fi0900061 varisvuori-louhukangas-saukonl hde * 170,8 26,0497 63,4250 fi0900062 myllykankaan mets * 33,9 25,5817 62,7181 fi0900063 suurusneva * 25, 25,7706 63,4706 fi0900064 isosuo * 62, 26,4472 62,7242 fi0900065 multarinmeri-harjuntakanen-riitasuo * 1151, 25,1225 63,4592 fi0900066 haarapuronniitty-vuorij rvi * 42, 25,8189 63,2153 fi0900067 palokankaan lammet * 81, 26,0478 63,0864 fi0900068 rahkasuo * 101, 25,8350 63,3450 fi0900069 pyh -h kin alue * 2125, 25,4517 62,8486 fi0900070 kolima-keitele -koskireitti * 471, 25,9508 63,1328 fi0900072 kolima 4769, 25,7425 63,2967 fi0900073 valkeisenj rvi-s rkilampi-utusuo * 123, 24,8056 62,5450 fi0900074 haapasuo-syysniemi-rutaj rvi-kivij rvi * 5 063,8 26,0322 61,9258 fi0900075 suonteen pohjoisosa * 5453, 26,2650 61,7669 fi0900076 suonteen etel osa * 2625, 26,4994 61,6611 fi0900077 onkisalo-herjaanselk * 2063, 25,5342 61,6889 fi0900078 edessalo-haukkasalo * 2 653,9 25,4022 61,7475 fi0900079 vanhanselk -ruppavuori * 306, 25,5156 61,8431 fi0900080 vahervuori * 21, 25,6647 61,8014 fi0900081 tervaj rvi * 24, 25,7178 62,3683 fi0900082 tuomistonjoki 0,6 24,6031 62,2353 fi0900083 iilij rven alue * 889, 25,8958 62,0925 fi0900084 lullinvuori-kustaanvuori-h rk pohja * 96, 25,7403 62,0894 fi0900085 syrj harju * 65, 25,0622 62,3233 fi0900086 kivij rvenvuori-m yr m en lehto * 32, 25,9139 61,9817 fi0900087 pohjoisj rven mets * 27, 25,3725 62,3794 fi0900088 palstonvuori-j skel * 178, 25,8736 62,1689 fi0900089 pitk j rvenvuoren mets t * 210, 25,1611 62,0214 fi0900090 kivij rvi * 5366, 25,1861 63,0644 fi0900091 kylkisaaret raakkipuron mets pohjoiskallio * 116, 25,4478 62,9600 fi0900092 hein suon alue * 86, 25,1078 63,0228 fi0900093 haukisuo-h rk suo-kukkoneva * 2472, 24,4072 62,8803 fi0900095 hertunvuori 93, 25,1978 61,7011 fi0900096 s rkij rven mets myllyvuori * 142, 25,3494 62,1333 fi0900097 pyh j rven lintuvesi 176, 26,1369 62,7608 fi0900098 putkilahti * 226, 25,6889 61,8792 fi0900099 ristisuo * 52, 25,4536 62,0781 fi0900100 rotkovuoren alue * 47, 24,9575 61,9144 fi0900101 isoj rvi-arvajanreitti * 4641, 25,0267 61,7058 fi0900102 huhkainvuori 28, 25,1828 61,4786 fi0900103 lapinj rvi-teerikangas * 106, 26,2594 62,2306 fi0900104 vatianj rven saraaveden alue * 394, 25,9211 62,4511 fi0900105 kier lammen kalliot pyykkivuori 36, 26,2006 62,3675 fi0900106 rokasuo * 99, 26,1903 61,9425 fi0900107 v llyvuori-huuvuori-haukkavuori * 184, 25,9994 62,0306 fi0900108 myllyvuori-vilhusenm ki * 34, 24,7886 62,4822 fi0900109 vesilahdensuo-kurkisuo * 192, 24,5697 62,4914 fi0900110 joensuonkangas * 52, 24,9836 62,4828 fi0900111 kuusm ki-tikkam ki-kirkkokangas-valkeavuori * 223, 25,5047 62,2172 fi0900112 kulhanvuoren alue * 745, 24,9639 62,5819 fi0900113 ristiniemen l hteikk * 14, 25,4461 62,6622 fi0900114 katajaneva vuorilammen alue huhtalampi * 288, 26,1619 62,0664 fi0900115 kaitaj rvi * 206, 25,3372 61,6928 fi0900116 muurainkorpi-niittosuo * 147, 26,0119 63,2219 fi0900117 kivineva-karhukangas * 201, 25,3767 63,2681 fi0900118 ruokom ki * 54, 25,3661 63,2053 fi0900119 yl -keitele * 3641, 25,6778 63,1131 fi0900120 hakovuori-koljatti * 124, 25,7272 63,0411 fi0900121 kivetyn alue * 168, 25,7394 62,8558 fi0900122 ison s rkij rven mets metsokangas * 53, 25,6456 62,7047 fi0900123 pihlajavesi ja yl juoksun pienvedet * 2592, 24,2786 62,3600 fi0900124 hallinm ki * 211, 25,1031 62,1522 fi0900125 honkaneva * 62, 26,2550 62,6075 fi0900126 k rpp j rven alue * 809, 25,3319 61,6483 fi0900127 silm suo-kiminginjoki * 55, 24,7306 62,6006 fi0900128 tervaniemen alue * 104, 24,6336 62,6894 fi0900129 koivuvuori pienen paloj rven mets * 101, 25,3900 63,1044 fi0900130 mertaj rvi pieni-selki inen * 84, 26,2419 62,7353 fi0900131 vihtam en lettor me * 3, 26,6353 62,4450 fi0900132 virkam en letto-kovasr me * 33,8 25,8589 63,3631 fi0900133 kummunpuro * 4,9 25,1572 62,8336 fi0900134 syv ojanm ki * 18,6 25,5864 62,3914 fi0900136 louhuvuori * 95, 25,1861 63,4792 fi0900137 lehtisenneva * 28,7 25,6581 62,7564 fi0900139 rajala * 91, 25,1028 61,7475 fi0900140 kilpisuo * 247, 24,7797 62,9881 fi0900144 palosenranta * 4,4 26,1289 62,0592 fi0900145 aholan laitumet * 1,8 25,1158 63,3281 fi0900146 lampuodinsuo * 82, 25,0944 62,5069 fi0900148 jousm ki * 21, 25,2958 62,0931 fi1000001 isosaaren tulvalehto * 39, 23,3100 63,8011 fi1000003 rummel n-harrb dan * 236, 23,0819 63,8764 fi1000004 laajalahti 194, 23,0161 63,7897 fi1000005 rahjan saaristo * 8381, 23,6133 64,1875 fi1000006 mustakorpi * 13,6 25,0906 64,0967 fi1000007 vihas-keih slahti * 138, 23,8372 64,2603 fi1000008 j k l neva * 233, 24,1594 64,0397 fi1000009 iso m llineva pieni m llineva * 676, 24,4611 63,9794 fi1000010 maakannuskarinlahti ja viirretjoen suisto * 204, 23,6100 64,0497 fi1000011 etel -syd nmaa * 706, 25,0342 63,4917 fi1000012 kalajoen suisto * 327, 23,9044 64,2883 fi1000013 k t landet * 435, 22,8897 63,8800 fi1000014 ritaneva-vipusalonneva-m rsynneva * 2206, 24,0433 63,7731 fi1000015 r yringin lehdot 132, 23,7547 63,3925 fi1000016 jokisuunlahti ja valmosanneva * 235, 23,4961 63,3739 fi1000017 vattajanniemi * 3970, 23,6778 63,4744 fi1000018 vainionhaka * 1, 23,9719 64,3411 fi1000019 vionneva * 878, 23,9008 63,6472 fi1000022 pyh j rvi * 4018, 25,9831 63,6042 fi1000025 viitaj rvi * 155, 24,1917 63,8778 fi1000026 etel nevan-viitasalonnevan-selj sennevan alue * 2506, 23,8094 63,8303 fi1000028 v h j rven lehto ja ruotsalon letot * 81, 23,3878 63,8956 fi1000029 iso ristineva pikku ristineva * 272, 23,5139 63,7683 fi1000031 isoraivio ja pilleskyt * 15, 24,1372 63,2319 fi1000034 kotkanneva ja pikku-koppelon mets t * 3305, 24,3511 63,5492 fi1000036 l hdeneva * 246, 23,8664 63,7564 fi1000040 siiponjoki * 419, 23,8031 64,1997 fi1000047 hautahuhta * 31, 23,9394 63,3586 fi1000056 hirsineva * 327, 25,4875 63,9081 fi1000057 lestijoki 370, 24,1017 63,8700 fi1000058 maristonpakat * 215, 23,8656 64,2589 fi1001001 pilvineva * 3667, 23,9892 63,4800 fi1001002 linjalamminkangas * 461, 24,5058 63,3806 fi1001003 patanaj rvenkangas * 298, 24,2439 63,2036 fi1001004 kivinevan alue * 2120, 24,6036 63,6536 fi1001005 lestijoen yl juoksu ja paukaneva * 1551, 24,5875 63,6261 fi1001006 mattilansaari * 59, 24,5875 63,5067 fi1001007 lestij rven saaret * 2152, 24,7442 63,5225 fi1001008 lehtosenj rvi * 1038, 24,7586 63,3906 fi1001009 isoneva * 632, 24,6236 63,5783 fi1001010 hangasneva-s st piirinneva * 3550, 24,3706 63,3272 fi1001011 h t lamminneva * 1316, 24,3347 63,1492 fi1001012 linjasalmenneva * 2656, 24,5981 63,4086 fi1001013 salamaj rvi * 8948, 24,7653 63,2550 fi1002001 tervaneva-sivakkaneva-pitk kangas * 1321, 25,5906 63,6328 fi1002002 k rs m enj rvet * 431, 26,2353 63,9108 fi1002003 iso karsikkoneva * 223, 25,5592 63,5928 fi1002004 haudanneva * 289, 26,0700 63,8356 fi1002005 lohijoen lehto * 18, 25,4494 63,6744 fi1002006 korteojan korpi * 8, 25,2761 63,6839 fi1002007 j ms nkallio * 40, 25,1894 63,7497 fi1002008 alakangas * 59, 24,8092 63,7222 fi1002009 niinikorpi * 2, 25,8936 63,4972 fi1002010 lehtoniemi * 11, 25,9825 63,4697 fi1002011 ry k nkangas * 25, 24,4044 64,2422 fi1002012 sauviinm ki 6, 25,3508 63,7844 fi1002013 pes neva * 161, 24,8489 63,8003 fi1002014 rimpineva-linttineva * 673, 24,8786 63,8614 fi1002015 pitk neva * 625, 24,9422 63,8081 fi1002017 pajuper nkangas * 37,1 25,2722 63,6303 fi1002018 vihtanevan aarnimets * 12, 25,1381 63,7408 fi1002019 hepom en haka 0,8 25,5519 63,5592 fi1002021 kursun yhteislaidun * 23, 25,9344 63,6606 fi1100001 haapaveden lintuvedet ja suot * 3616, 25,5131 64,2633 fi1100002 korkattivuori * 30, 25,5217 64,1956 fi1100006 iso honkaneva-pieni honkaneva * 179, 24,8703 64,1444 fi1100201 hailuoto, pohjoisranta * 3671, 24,7417 65,0853 fi1100202 kirkkosalmi * 1019, 24,7117 64,9664 fi1100203 isomatala-maasyv nlahti * 1531, 24,7983 64,9419 fi1100204 ojakyl nlahti ja keng nkari * 291, 24,8153 65,0453 fi1100206 h rkinneva-hanhisj rvensuo * 556, 24,8261 64,9950 fi1100207 merikalla 5210, 24,0339 65,4914 fi1100400 poikainlammit-karhusuo * 1025, 25,9542 65,2583 fi1100402 joutsensuo-vareputaanojanlehto * 41, 25,4081 65,2256 fi1100403 iso kalliosuo ja satamosuo * 251, 25,9969 65,2106 fi1100404 kumpulampien-uikulaisj rvien alue * 297, 25,5847 65,1194 fi1100405 laitakari-h yrysenniemi-purjekari * 91, 25,2817 65,2336 fi1100600 hiastinlahti * 168, 25,3228 65,3564 fi1100601 iijoen suisto * 1 661,9 25,2800 65,3456 fi1100602 r ytt * 58,3 25,2067 65,2789 fi1101002 veneneva-pelso * 12039, 26,1819 64,4806 fi1101201 kiimingin lettoalue * 1083, 25,9622 65,1103 fi1101202 kiiminkijoki 10 883,63 2 131,59 26,1556 65,1386 fi1101203 kiiminkijoen suisto * 208,8 25,3194 65,1925 fi1101204 yl -kourilehto * 5, 26,0047 65,0933 fi1101205 haara * 15,4 25,8775 65,1378 fi1101400 iso hirviaapa-l hteenaapa * 1306, 25,6528 65,6283 fi1101401 j nessuo * 1 092,3 25,9108 65,7394 fi1101402 tuuliaapa- iso heposuo * 1075, 25,3919 65,5778 fi1101403 viitaojanlatvasuo * 819, 25,8561 65,5714 fi1101405 rimpij rvi-uusij rvi * 1391, 25,5175 65,7281 fi1101406 kyyttikarinnokka * 0,02 25,1672 65,5664 fi1101600 sukerij rvi * 3394, 28,9106 66,3697 fi1101601 valtavaara pyh vaara * 1027, 29,2006 66,1903 fi1101602 teerisuo-hanhiharju * 436, 29,7539 65,5847 fi1101603 kouvervaaran lehdot ja suot * 123, 28,8250 66,1275 fi1101611 iivaara jousivaara * 2407, 29,7064 65,7933 fi1101612 siikalampi hiidensuo- palovaaransuo * 382, 29,4475 66,0392 fi1101614 muoj rvi * 4521, 29,6603 65,9317 fi1101615 suininki * 725, 29,6089 66,0661 fi1101616 kitka * 12413, 28,6917 66,1544 fi1101617 isosuo kivisuo * 2590, 28,7864 65,7333 fi1101618 vapalampi lohilampi kuntivaara * 1170, 29,8436 66,1664 fi1101619 oravisuo * 444, 29,6128 66,2547 fi1101620 p tk nsuo * 666, 28,9894 65,9100 fi1101622 harjasuo laurinkorpi * 172, 29,2989 66,3031 fi1101625 ruoppisuo, nojosenvaarankurun ja valkeaisenpuron lehdot * 110, 28,8692 66,0428 fi1101626 kumpuvaaran suot * 23, 29,2372 66,2386 fi1101627 s rkiper l yhk nen antinvaara * 799, 29,2986 66,1353 fi1101628 reposuo * 47, 29,1928 66,0900 fi1101629 vasaraniemen suot 57, 28,7117 66,0769 fi1101630 oijusluoma * 1179, 29,0031 65,8350 fi1101631 paljakan mets t ja suot * 1141, 29,7928 66,1997 fi1101632 lohivaara * 1470, 28,6172 65,8711 fi1101633 k tkytvaara * 407, 28,6633 66,4061 fi1101635 etel -kuusamon mets t * 15368, 29,7608 65,6614 fi1101645 oulanka * 29390, 29,3433 66,4606 fi1101800 lauttaneva * 195, 26,0983 63,9833 fi1101801 lauttanevan mets t * 22, 26,0717 63,9933 fi1101803 lapinniemi * 31, 25,8944 63,9164 fi1101804 latvakangas * 26, 25,7375 63,9103 fi1102000 loukkuneva-isoneva * 780, 25,8350 64,5681 fi1102200 liminganlahti * 11823, 25,2503 64,9044 fi1102201 haarasuo * 683, 25,0289 64,7800 fi1102601 muhos- ja poikajoen alueet * 498, 26,1764 64,7489 fi1102602 tikanlantto-isolantto * 8,2 26,0483 64,7158 fi1102605 p ij nne-v lisuo ja ruostesuo * 1157, 26,1194 64,6808 fi1102606 r lantto-murtokoski ja syv ojansuu * 79, 26,0750 64,7178 fi1102607 l yt suo-karpassuo-reik suo * 1516, 26,2658 64,7044 fi1102608 rokua * 4231, 26,4781 64,5789 fi1102800 hirvineva * 631, 25,1767 64,2889 fi1102801 salmineva-piurukkaj rvi * 276, 24,9000 64,3658 fi1102802 mustakyd n mets * 18,8 25,0228 64,2725 fi1102803 ohinevan mets * 25,5 24,9167 64,2178 fi1103000 kempeleenlahden ranta * 192, 25,4758 64,9533 fi1103001 pilpasuo * 367, 25,7647 64,9719 fi1103002 letonniemi * 42, 25,4006 65,0589 fi1103004 oulujoen suisto * 44,7 25,4311 65,0131 fi1103200 akionlahti * 260, 25,2872 64,9886 fi1103400 olkijokisuu-pattijoen pohjoishaara * 202, 24,5508 64,7236 fi1103401 l hdeneva * 21, 24,7117 64,6094 fi1103402 pitk sneva * 567, 24,8072 64,4614 fi1103600 pellikaisenneva * 237, 26,0567 64,0919 fi1103602 iso suksineva-ahvenj rvenneva-turvakonneva * 476, 26,2667 64,1731 fi1103800 seipikangas ja seipikankaan korpi * 314, 27,2569 65,6931 fi1103801 venkaan l hde 5, 26,4564 65,4292 fi1103802 ohtosensuo * 2161, 27,2528 65,4886 fi1103803 kuusisuo-hattusuo * 3870, 26,5236 65,2069 fi1103804 soininsuo-kapustasuo * 2491, 26,8056 65,5744 fi1103805 k rpp suo-r in nsuo * 1592, 26,3192 65,4064 fi1103806 sumusuo * 683, 26,4153 65,6069 fi1103807 luhtar mi ja haaposuo-korppisuo * 1666, 27,1578 65,2842 fi1103808 tyr suo * 763, 26,6133 65,4606 fi1103809 ruosuo-isosuo * 508, 27,3106 65,6478 fi1103810 naamanganjoen niitty * 1,4 27,6750 65,5156 fi1103811 sulanvaaranpaljakka * 165,3 27,7381 65,5325 fi1103813 maaselk * 3230, 27,8014 65,6319 fi1103814 kaahlo-oja-susisuo * 1851, 26,9694 65,7028 fi1103815 jaurakkavaara * 427, 27,6589 65,1219 fi1103816 sammalharju * 559, 27,8572 65,3547 fi1103819 pudasj rvi * 548, 26,9489 65,3775 fi1103820 sotkaj rvi ja helkalansuo-kalettomansuo * 845, 27,3236 65,3344 fi1103821 puntarivaara * 168, 27,9861 65,2906 fi1103822 saarilampi * 117, 27,4361 65,5511 fi1103823 j k l vaaran rinnesuot ja rytisuo * 65, 27,3986 65,2011 fi1103824 kaakkurinrimmit * 1027, 26,7842 65,4364 fi1103827 litokaira * 30382, 26,2606 65,7297 fi1103828 sy te * 19641, 27,6525 65,7586 fi1103829 olvassuo * 27073, 27,2639 65,1286 fi1103830 hirvisuo * 4481, 26,2536 65,2408 fi1104200 telkkisaaret * 86, 24,7133 64,3906 fi1104201 parhalahti-sy l tinlahti ja heinikarinlampi * 275, 24,2656 64,4994 fi1104202 rajalahti-perilahti * 91, 24,1136 64,4281 fi1104203 sunin alue * 93, 23,9939 64,3778 fi1104401 it m ki-etel joki * 444, 26,7000 64,1042 fi1104402 kansanneva-kurkineva-muurainsuo * 1659, 26,4339 64,1003 fi1104404 kinkerisaarenneva * 134, 26,5303 64,0889 fi1104406 m yk naho * 41, 26,7522 64,0556 fi1104407 sammakkolammen mets * 41, 26,2503 63,8650 fi1104408 t rm senrimpi-kolkanneva * 2126, 26,6322 64,2025 fi1104600 raahen saaristo * 2240, 24,3897 64,6911 fi1104601 viitaj rven alue * 25, 24,5369 64,6428 fi1104602 kuljunm en niitty * 2,1 24,4372 64,6428 fi1104603 puntarim ki * 4, 24,4817 64,6186 fi1104604 jouttineva * 12, 24,5658 64,6031 fi1104605 rytilammen alue ja arkkukari * 19, 24,4336 64,6189 fi1104800 matkusneva-ukonvaajanneva * 413, 25,4678 64,5631 fi1104801 heikkil n laitumet * 1,7 25,7350 64,4394 fi1105000 akanneva-rimmenneva * 444, 25,4133 64,4792 fi1105001 revonneva-ruonneva * 3814, 25,1081 64,7247 fi1105200 huhtaneva-lumineva * 687, 24,9153 64,8367 fi1105201 s renper ja karinkannanmatala * 624, 24,9678 64,9072 fi1105202 siikajoen lintuvedet ja suot * 2067, 24,6481 64,8211 fi1105401 lauttasuo * 777, 28,1386 65,3494 fi1105402 m t sojan lehto * 16, 27,8419 65,5825 fi1105403 maijanlampi * 423, 28,1408 65,5283 fi1105404 kylm nper n l hteikk 3, 28,1872 65,5661 fi1105405 salmitunturi r pysj rvi * 7572, 28,2236 65,7525 fi1105406 mets kyl * 2671, 28,4594 65,3017 fi1105407 latva korte k rpp vaara * 2041, 28,0350 65,6794 fi1105408 tervaj rvi * 1426, 28,3219 65,4303 fi1105409 sammakkoaho * 664, 29,0294 65,4847 fi1105410 koivuoja * 309, 28,1181 65,4611 fi1105411 pahkakuru ja jurmunlampi * 95, 28,0408 65,5281 fi1105412 uusitalon niitty * 1,1 28,0208 65,7306 fi1105413 kylm luoma * 7341, 28,7439 65,5811 fi1106000 s ipp suo-kivisuo * 4428, 26,7669 64,7439 fi1106001 niittysuo-siiransuo * 2485, 26,8239 65,0097 fi1106003 kurimonkosken niityt * 7,9 27,2281 64,9544 fi1106004 tolkansuo * 1990, 26,7842 64,6636 fi1106005 torvensuo-viidansuo * 1478, 26,7267 64,9539 fi1106200 hanhelan joenvarsilaitumet * 1,1 24,7000 64,4900 fi1106201 vaippaneva * 91, 24,8581 64,5544 fi1106400 virvikkosuo * 221, 26,0397 65,4775 fi1106401 kusisuo * 419, 25,7292 65,4542 fi1106602 r k suo * 2631, 26,2922 64,8736 fi1106603 heposuo * 3, 26,2925 64,9433 fi1106604 hillikkosuo * 287, 26,6025 65,0375 fi1106605 kalliomaa * 132, 26,6025 64,9697 fi1200002 kelosuo * 106, 29,0686 64,4869 fi1200003 raiskion rutju * 15, 28,2961 64,6861 fi1200051 julmasuo * 448, 29,2050 64,5019 fi1200052 tulisuon varpusuon alue * 3227, 29,3758 64,5678 fi1200053 kitkansuo * 561, 28,3947 64,7858 fi1200054 joutensuon mustosensuon alue, myllykoski ja hiidenkirkko * 2112, 29,0339 64,6656 fi1200055 s kkisenlatvasuo j nnesuo lamminsuo ja peuravaara * 687, 28,1772 64,6544 fi1200056 paljakka ja latvavaara * 3119, 28,0378 64,7108 fi1200057 p lh vaara * 374, 28,6228 64,6086 fi1200058 vorlokki * 645, 28,2689 64,7217 fi1200059 saarij rven aarnialue * 1366, 28,5706 64,8114 fi1200100 kiiskinen ja varissuo * 815, 27,5194 63,9894 fi1200102 lehmivaaran ja torakankaan lehdot ja suot * 39, 27,8808 64,3497 fi1200104 ouluj rven saaret ja ranta-alueet * 6317, 27,1042 64,4747 fi1200200 kolkonsuo * 276, 29,7372 64,5619 fi1200201 riihivaaran alue * 948, 30,1575 64,2142 fi1200202 issakka * 889, 30,1308 63,8778 fi1200203 ristivaara * 907, 29,4256 63,9075 fi1200204 salmivaara * 84, 29,4492 63,8672 fi1200205 vattuvaara * 383, 29,8525 63,9106 fi1200206 eeronvaara * 398, 29,7989 63,7667 fi1200207 hevoshuuhdinpuro ja honkivaara * 517, 28,8600 64,3408 fi1200208 juortanansalon alue * 5436, 29,8903 64,5761 fi1200209 lammasaho * 169, 29,7742 63,9867 fi1200210 kieverrysj rvet * 711, 29,9525 63,7642 fi1200212 joutenvaara * 515, 30,2067 63,8322 fi1200213 valkeisj rvi * 600, 28,7944 64,2939 fi1200214 pellinkangas * 707, 28,9331 64,2903 fi1200215 kinnussuo mustinsuo * 686, 28,8531 64,4703 fi1200216 isosuo koirasuo ymp rist ineen * 1666, 29,3119 64,4711 fi1200217 kallioj rven seutu joutensuo * 1204, 29,3267 64,3781 fi1200218 kukkosenvaaran alue * 244, 30,4269 64,0886 fi1200219 vonganj rvi ja vuorivaara * 821, 30,5144 64,1083 fi1200220 elimyssalon alue * 8293, 30,3800 64,1925 fi1200221 teerisuon lososuon alue * 3046, 29,2733 63,8900 fi1200222 hirvivaaran suoniemensuon alue * 932, 29,5036 64,5292 fi1200223 jonkerinsalon alue * 3639, 29,7153 63,8375 fi1200224 vilhonpet ikk * 158, 30,2425 63,9600 fi1200225 ulvinsalon alue * 3949, 30,3636 63,9656 fi1200251 lentuan alue * 6591, 29,6389 64,2486 fi1200252 iso palonen maarians rk t * 4053, 30,1786 64,3106 fi1200253 kokkamo kylm j rvi * 909, 30,1900 64,1514 fi1200257 kelloj rven ranta-alueet ja saaret * 1395, 29,0447 64,2753 fi1200258 hanhisuo teerisuo * 304, 29,1697 64,0092 fi1200259 valtasenj rvi 113, 30,1103 64,3483 fi1200260 pihlajapuro * 301, 30,0258 63,8797 fi1200261 paljakanvaara * 198, 29,8858 63,9736 fi1200300 kivesvaaran ja ker senvaaran lehdot ja letot * 61, 27,5603 64,4497 fi1200301 matalansuo * 222, 27,6567 64,4461 fi1200302 melalahden lehdot ja horkanlampi * 34, 27,6753 64,3947 fi1200303 likolampi ja koikeroj rven kaakkoisranta * 11, 27,7814 64,4325 fi1200304 antinm ki-kylm npuro ja hevossuo * 90, 28,0414 64,3475 fi1200306 joutensuo * 264, 27,4200 64,5522 fi1200400 mutalammen suot * 102, 27,6853 64,7019 fi1200401 siikavaaran korpijoen seutu * 2870, 27,9408 65,1347 fi1200402 nuottivaara puhakkasuo * 479, 27,9125 65,0642 fi1200403 suovaara * 582, 28,0478 64,8433 fi1200404 ik nvaara * 172, 27,8672 64,8417 fi1200405 ik nselk * 939, 27,9289 64,9497 fi1200406 kuirivaara * 1753, 27,8886 64,8953 fi1200407 sikanoreikko * 252, 27,9050 64,9981 fi1200408 huokost rm * 368, 27,9919 64,9097 fi1200409 pirunkirkon aarnialue * 74, 27,9469 64,7072 fi1200410 hepok nk n alue * 150, 27,8639 64,8175 fi1200411 kurikkavaaran aarnialue ja lehdot * 116, 27,8336 64,7792 fi1200451 ison kaitasen lehto * 15, 27,8194 64,5631 fi1200452 honkajoen lehto * 13, 27,7750 64,7067 fi1200453 iso saarisuo * 73, 27,9417 64,9039 fi1200454 ison j nisj rven lehto ja letto * 22, 27,9531 64,9839 fi1200457 pihlajavaaran lehto * 31, 27,8183 64,7978 fi1200459 suolij rven rytisuo * 59, 28,0108 65,1339 fi1200460 vellisuo iso koirasuo * 181, 28,0194 65,1978 fi1200462 vuorisuo ja iso vuorilampi * 58, 28,0739 65,1853 fi1200463 iso tilansuo housusuo * 3449, 27,4047 64,9581 fi1200464 saarij rven vanhat mets t * 1355, 27,5172 64,8008 fi1200465 vellisuo vuorisuo * 509, 27,5256 65,0658 fi1200466 karhusuo viitasuo * 1105, 27,3725 64,8633 fi1200467 n t suo * 140, 28,0492 64,7667 fi1200500 saukkovaaran ja koljatinvaaran lehdot * 21, 28,2728 64,4872 fi1200502 karhisensuo py re suo lokkisuo * 351, 28,7942 64,5036 fi1200511 kallioj rvi pit m vaara * 861, 28,7047 64,4200 fi1200600 lauttolahden soidinvaaran kohteet * 15, 27,8892 64,1658 fi1200602 ketrinsaari ja noronvaara 5, 28,1911 64,0356 fi1200604 vuoriniemi * 19, 29,0797 63,9475 fi1200605 solansuo * 654, 28,6214 64,3153 fi1200607 rommakkovaara * 159, 28,4764 63,9031 fi1200608 r t kangas * 667, 28,7208 64,0247 fi1200609 kortesuo * 332, 28,8125 64,2481 fi1200621 korsunrinne * 51, 28,1708 63,9142 fi1200622 heiskasenpuro * 116, 28,7825 63,8733 fi1200623 hiidenvaara l yt sensuo * 554, 28,2517 63,8119 fi1200624 viltovaara * 258, 28,2519 63,8583 fi1200625 hiidenportin alueet * 5166, 29,0561 63,8747 fi1200700 karhuhetteensuo * 6, 28,2061 65,2097 fi1200701 porrassuo 38, 29,2267 65,1556 fi1200702 vasonniemi ja pahalammenpuro * 8, 29,0969 65,1289 fi1200703 rytyskalliot * 14, 29,2808 65,2969 fi1200704 lokkisuo-teerisuo * 113, 29,0881 64,6942 fi1200706 louhensuo * 599, 28,2400 65,0264 fi1200707 lev vaara * 464, 29,4125 65,2897 fi1200708 lohivaaran matarasuon alue * 669, 28,2578 65,2328 fi1200710 isosuo ja iso kukkosuo * 335, 28,3967 64,8803 fi1200711 portinvaaran alue * 125, 29,2778 65,2514 fi1200712 s yn j suon matalasuon alue * 1094, 29,0606 64,8031 fi1200713 mesi nvaara * 507, 29,4658 64,9108 fi1200714 huuhkajanlehto * 392, 28,8928 65,1819 fi1200715 housuvaara * 797, 29,5969 65,2881 fi1200716 ulkuvaara ulkupuro * 263, 29,3244 65,2322 fi1200717 huurunvaara iso niittylampi * 517, 29,0481 65,1853 fi1200718 tormuan pohjavaara riitasuo * 1700, 29,4431 65,3692 fi1200719 martinselkonen * 6194, 29,7853 65,1903 fi1200720 jylkkyvaara ja jylkynsuo * 583, 28,5942 65,1167 fi1200721 syd nmaanaro * 2986, 29,2889 64,9825 fi1200722 risti-luoma * 395, 29,2158 65,2789 fi1200723 ilosenkangas kylm suo * 796, 28,4214 65,1261 fi1200724 rimpisuo * 253, 29,3961 65,0481 fi1200725 kala-peuro * 191, 29,3681 65,3469 fi1200726 it j rvi * 258, 28,7364 64,9631 fi1200727 porttiloma * 209, 28,1822 65,1172 fi1200728 jyrkk vaara * 480, 28,5192 65,1458 fi1200729 hiienvaara * 375, 28,4517 64,9517 fi1200730 viisiriihinen * 318, 29,6789 64,8314 fi1200731 m kilamminvaara * 328, 28,6064 65,1856 fi1200732 n lj ng n pohjanvaara * 359, 28,7711 65,1531 fi1200733 iso vaskenvaara * 316, 29,7119 65,0897 fi1200734 roimanvaara ja paljakkavaaran suo * 186, 28,0967 65,2169 fi1200735 riuskanselkonen * 4226, 28,8153 65,2731 fi1200736 m ntypuro * 203, 29,4847 65,0447 fi1200737 karsikkovaara losolehto * 1128, 29,6125 64,8658 fi1200738 julma * 222, 29,0353 65,0925 fi1200739 hinkusuo * 1461, 29,2056 65,3339 fi1200740 ll rins rkk * 508, 29,8389 65,1042 fi1200741 vierem nsuon alue * 2952, 29,6750 65,3678 fi1200742 murhisalo * 6548, 30,0092 64,6928 fi1200743 hossa * 10162, 29,3447 65,4747 fi1200744 pahamaailma * 2072, 29,6528 65,4606 fi1200763 isonp nlampi 6, 29,9431 64,6311 fi1200764 jumaliss rk n hoikans rk n alue * 529, 29,3194 64,7178 fi1200800 rumala kuvaja oudonrimmet * 4849, 26,6681 64,3297 fi1200802 likainen ja likaisen penikka 16, 26,6686 64,5031 fi1200804 siirasojan lehto * 24, 26,5839 64,5678 fi1200805 sarvisuo jerusaleminsuo * 3634, 27,1033 64,7814 fi1200901 talaskankaan alue * 4915, 27,1147 63,9992 fi1200902 p nt nsuo * 293, 26,8081 64,1347 fi1200921 otanneva * 57, 27,0750 64,1086 fi1200922 karppisensuo salinsuo joutensuo * 686, 27,3931 64,1653 fi1200923 rimpineva matilanneva * 599, 26,7878 64,2333 fi1201001 k rmelammen letto * 6, 29,0206 64,6433 fi1201002 j m svaaran alue * 3257, 29,4658 63,9725 fi1201003 n t vaara * 299,9 29,7403 63,7336 fi1201005 kaahla-aho * 135, 27,4694 65,0175 fi1201006 kapustajoen l hteikk * 1, 27,7658 64,8742 fi1201007 kotuskasuo * 335,7 28,6406 63,8828 fi1201009 losonvaara * 370,8 27,9106 64,0667 fi1201010 talvivaara * 284, 28,1603 63,9283 fi1201011 latvakangas * 44, 26,9531 64,6236 fi1201012 malahvia * 2383, 29,7092 64,7742 fi1201013 moilasenvaara * 1559, 29,5253 65,4067 fi1202001 isoaho * 31, 28,2256 64,0347 fi1202002 peltolan haka 3,1 28,2414 64,1886 fi1202003 kilpel nvaara * 28, 30,3203 64,0025 fi1202004 laamasenvaara * 30, 30,2767 63,9422 fi1300101 pallas-ounastunturi * 59426, 23,9378 68,1475 fi1300103 p yrisj rven er maa * 146834, 24,1558 68,6053 fi1300113 luppokurun lehto 24, 23,3378 68,2653 fi1300117 hietatievat-kalmankaltio * 994, 24,6975 68,4469 fi1300201 lemmenjoen kansallispuisto * 285990, 25,6064 68,5994 fi1300202 muotkatunturin er maa * 158208, 26,2947 69,1475 fi1300203 hammastunturin er maa * 154903, 26,6433 68,5631 fi1300204 v ts rin er maa * 157368, 28,5681 69,2275 fi1300205 tsarmitunturin er maa * 16758, 28,4064 68,6775 fi1300206 hanhij nk -pierkivaaranj nk * 4648, 27,1542 69,1978 fi1300210 kettujoki-vaskojoki * 1995, 26,7211 68,8953 fi1300211 ivalojokisuisto * 1 123,9 27,6542 68,7489 fi1300212 inarij rvi * 89960, 27,7322 68,9353 fi1300301 per meren kansallipuisto * 15890, 24,3206 65,6275 fi1300302 per meren saaret * 7136, 24,8592 65,3653 fi1300401 haikara-aapa-vitsikkoaapa * 1867, 26,9306 66,9678 fi1300402 tynnyriaapa * 629, 27,7625 66,7686 fi1300405 javarustunturi * 1396, 27,2181 66,9144 fi1300406 ottavaara * 820, 27,6656 66,4833 fi1300407 siikajoki-juujoki 121,9 32 27,5689 66,3517 fi1300501 kallinkangas * 56, 24,5122 65,8136 fi1300503 kaltioj ng n lehto 5, 24,6544 65,8092 fi1300504 tornivaaran lehto 19, 24,9547 65,8592 fi1300505 kirvesaapa * 1827, 24,8064 65,7806 fi1300507 musta-aapa * 355, 24,7775 65,7200 fi1300601 puljun er maa * 56351, 24,7169 68,3419 fi1300602 siukatanj rvet * 2040, 25,0039 68,1819 fi1300603 ahvenvuoma * 2207, 24,9900 67,5864 fi1300604 n t vuoma-sotkavuoma * 10675, 25,5050 67,3844 fi1300605 loukisen latvasuot * 9414, 25,5889 67,8197 fi1300606 kuortano-saivinvuoma-launij rvi * 9831, 24,8922 67,9928 fi1300607 lepp vuoma-murtovuoma-saattoporanvuoma * 2138, 24,5842 67,8153 fi1300608 tollovuoma-silm svuoma-mustaoja-nunaravuoma * 9673, 25,4292 67,5836 fi1300611 naatsukka-aapa * 10609, 25,8675 68,2039 fi1300615 kerpuaj rvi * 63, 24,6942 67,3269 fi1300616 kivij rvi-pikku kivij rvi 135, 24,4644 67,4469 fi1300618 yll s-aakenus * 38646, 24,3136 67,7306 fi1300619 kumputunturi * 1268, 25,5431 67,7258 fi1300701 teuravuoma-kivij rvenvuoma * 5788, 24,0900 67,3392 fi1300702 sieppij nk -pieruvuoma * 1413, 23,7797 67,1711 fi1300704 karhuvuoma * 957, 24,4622 67,2889 fi1300705 juustovuoma * 998, 24,6011 67,1650 fi1300706 niesaselk * 1950, 24,0461 67,4728 fi1300801 muonionj rvi-utkujoki 544, 23,5772 67,9781 fi1300901 pyh tunturi * 4338, 27,1167 67,0108 fi1300902 akanvaaran-kalkkivaaran lehdot * 21, 27,1236 67,1694 fi1300904 luiron suot * 12590, 27,5656 67,3444 fi1300905 serrijoki-k tk vuoma * 1021, 27,8842 67,1383 fi1300906 raateaapa * 1785, 27,6931 66,9811 fi1300907 kemihaaran suot * 14 060,3 27,7644 67,0553 fi1301001 koutusj rvi * 2303, 24,2600 66,6622 fi1301002 hyrsyvuoma * 103, 24,1756 66,5544 fi1301003 kaltioj nkk * 471, 24,2250 66,7528 fi1301004 paamaj rvi 393, 23,9611 66,6408 fi1301005 pelloj rvi-s yn j j rvi 583, 24,0153 66,7500 fi1301101 riisitunturin kansallispuisto * 12461, 28,4519 66,2094 fi1301102 mustarinnan tunturi * 9435, 27,6942 66,3328 fi1301103 livoj rvi * 3433, 28,1431 65,9892 fi1301104 korouoma-j niskaira * 9378, 27,6419 66,1058 fi1301106 p - ljy * 2162, 28,6319 66,4667 fi1301202 varpusuo-saarisuo * 1021, 27,1011 65,8783 fi1301203 asmuntinsuo-lamminsuo * 1130, 26,5039 65,8250 fi1301205 simoj rvi * 6367, 27,2103 66,0536 fi1301206 liejusuo-kaakkurisuo * 608, 26,4744 65,7458 fi1301207 joutensuo * 1023, 26,8139 66,1339 fi1301208 soppana * 1097, 27,4061 66,0967 fi1301209 m mmisuo * 1313, 27,2864 65,8850 fi1301301 mustiaapa-kaattasj rvi * 6117, 24,9181 66,4358 fi1301302 savioja 35, 25,3858 66,2300 fi1301304 kaihuavaaran lehto * 13, 26,8461 66,3739 fi1301306 louevaara * 1681, 25,1475 66,4169 fi1301312 namalikkokivalo * 836, 26,7550 66,3261 fi1301313 narkauksen-katiskon lehdot * 94, 26,2275 66,2875 fi1301314 kutuselk -kirist j selk * 2909, 25,9206 66,9364 fi1301315 koukkulanaapa-palokivalo * 2210, 25,6244 66,8075 fi1301316 herankaira * 2217, 26,7442 66,5056 fi1301317 auttik ng s * 377, 27,1867 66,2931 fi1301318 ounasjoki * 4730, 25,0775 67,1011 fi1301319 toramojoki 6 25,7556 66,7481 fi1301401 v rri * 12458, 29,6456 67,7386 fi1301402 tuntsan er maa * 21241, 29,5325 67,6375 fi1301403 suksenpaistama-miehink vaara * 6028, 28,7125 66,6256 fi1301404 joutsenaapa kaita-aapa * 12785, 28,6575 67,0764 fi1301405 termusaapa * 1285, 28,6300 66,8928 fi1301409 aatsinki-onkamo * 9746, 28,8594 66,7831 fi1301410 peuratunturi * 5285, 28,4811 66,7133 fi1301411 peurahaara * 46, 29,7611 67,6228 fi1301502 maltio * 14746, 28,7194 67,3958 fi1301504 ainij rven lehdot 69, 29,4347 67,7667 fi1301505 kellovuotso-kaarrer mi -hukka-aapa * 3498, 28,9225 67,5219 fi1301506 kuoskunj rvi * 77, 28,3058 67,2336 fi1301507 sieri isten harjulammet * 792, 28,5508 67,1844 fi1301510 vintil nkaira * 20076, 28,0506 67,6497 fi1301511 joutsitunturi-koukkutunturi * 15030, 29,1589 67,3922 fi1301512 t rm oja * 364, 29,4817 67,8503 fi1301513 yli-nuortti * 308,8 29,3831 67,7733 fi1301601 runkaus * 7050, 25,5208 66,0239 fi1301602 martimoaapa-lumiaapa-penikat * 14086, 25,1317 65,8406 fi1301603 veittiaapa * 2929, 25,4572 65,7817 fi1301604 iso saarisuo-hoikkasuo-musta-aapa * 768, 25,3147 65,6983 fi1301605 nikkil naapa * 346, 25,2050 65,6750 fi1301606 k rmeaapa * 1117, 25,8122 65,7703 fi1301611 kuivasj rvi * 105, 25,3744 65,9972 fi1301612 saariaapa-hattuselk * 2503, 25,6894 66,0406 fi1301613 simojoki 1153, 25,7908 65,8858 fi1301701 uk-puisto-sompio-kemihaara * 309771, 28,2800 68,1622 fi1301705 sota-aapa * 3178, 27,1389 68,2844 fi1301706 viiankiaapa * 6595, 26,8253 67,5392 fi1301707 vitsavaaranaapa-kieker selk * 1775, 26,3714 67,2606 fi1301708 suikeloaapa * 993, 26,4319 67,0897 fi1301712 pomokaira * 92358, 26,2011 67,9086 fi1301713 luosto * 8090, 26,9156 67,1036 fi1301714 ellitsa * 3376, 27,0650 67,2944 fi1301715 kulvakko * 1311, 26,2361 67,2136 fi1301716 koitelainen * 48938, 27,1758 67,8183 fi1301801 pisavaara * 4891, 25,0914 66,2822 fi1301802 ketunpes vaaran lehto 12, 25,1311 65,9658 fi1301805 k tk vaaran lehto 5, 24,9642 66,2306 fi1301806 kivimaan lehdot * 8, 24,7917 66,2089 fi1301807 pyh portin lehto 12, 25,4706 66,1678 fi1301810 kilsiaapa-ristivuoma * 9687, 24,8158 66,3358 fi1301811 suurip n alue * 4 278,4 24,9303 65,9908 fi1301812 karhuaapa-heinij nk -kokonr me * 1151, 25,1011 66,1950 fi1301813 auringonkorpi * 412, 25,0281 66,0911 fi1301814 tuiskukivalon n rheikk * 716, 25,8819 66,1847 fi1301901 vaaraj nkk -rovaj nkk * 394, 24,2708 66,0269 fi1301902 sattavuoma * 293, 24,3681 66,1000 fi1301903 kusiaiskorpi, palo-isokumman j nk , alkumaa * 441, 24,4369 65,8867 fi1301904 rakanj nkk * 83, 24,3106 65,8964 fi1301905 vinsanmaan letot * 24, 24,5067 66,0644 fi1301907 runtelin lehto 19, 24,2972 66,0408 fi1301908 karsilonmaa * 15, 24,2961 65,9167 fi1301909 huruj rvi-iso-mustaj rvi 310, 24,0253 66,1114 fi1301911 pajukari-uksei-alkunkarinlahti * 440, 24,2619 65,7881 fi1301912 tornionjoen-muonionjoen vesist alue 32000, 23,8403 67,8167 fi1302002 kaldoaivin er maa * 351633, 27,8675 69,6586 fi1302101 mellajoki * 353, 24,5797 66,3983 fi1302103 heinivuoma-pietinvuoma * 680, 23,9386 66,3194 fi1302104 meltosj rvet-pys j rvi 458, 24,6192 66,5394 fi1302105 kainuunkyl n saaret 1005, 23,7372 66,2136 fi1302107 romppaat * 256, 24,7650 66,4619 fi1302108 ahvenj rvi-lehdonj rvi * 280, 24,2594 66,3611 fi1400001 ramsholmen * 13, 19,8850 60,1086 fi1400002 mangelbo almskogen * 1, 19,9742 60,2644 fi1400003 svartn kaja * 144, 19,6336 60,2833 fi1400004 espholm * 7, 19,9583 60,0631 fi1400005 n t jungfrusk r * 547, 19,9294 60,0364 fi1400006 bj rk r * 5286, 20,1583 59,9133 fi1400007 sandsk r 13, 21,0178 59,9950 fi1400009 gran * 359, 20,5061 59,9961 fi1400010 l ngsk r sandsk r 359, 20,9125 60,0306 fi1400012 bl sk ren salungarna stora bredgrundet 334, 20,9917 60,1769 fi1400014 irisk rret * 2, 19,9575 60,1450 fi1400015 lilln sberget ting * 311, 20,0608 60,1836 fi1400017 herr skatan * 113, 20,1858 59,9703 fi1400018 stra r dklobb * 10, 19,4869 60,2400 fi1400019 br tt * 29, 20,3008 59,9831 fi1400021 box * 1254, 20,1047 60,4108 fi1400022 skag * 16, 20,2347 60,0967 fi1400023 id * 20, 20,9164 59,8722 fi1400024 hemdal * 7, 20,3222 60,3544 fi1400025 pr stg rdsn set * 33, 19,9319 60,2522 fi1400026 sg rda sten krar * 51, 20,0597 60,3425 fi1400027 h ckb leholmen * 13, 19,9006 60,3589 fi1400028 sk lklobbarna 206, 20,4450 60,2417 fi1400030 s dra sandb ck 294, 20,6756 60,7456 fi1400031 ytterstberg 272, 20,5314 60,5747 fi1400032 norr * 78, 21,0614 60,5550 fi1400033 stra insj n 2, 19,5444 60,2294 fi1400034 tr sket * 103, 19,5519 60,2514 fi1400035 m rrkallarna bergsgrynnan mj lsk rskallen 759, 19,3894 60,3894 fi1400036 degersand 0,5 19,5994 60,1547 fi1400037 tullhuset 0,5 19,5436 60,2206 fi1400038 berghamn 0,5 19,5356 60,2289 fi1400039 idsk r mellansk r skatan 274, 19,7572 60,4394 fi1400041 sl tn s * 13, 20,2956 59,9861 fi1400042 l ng r stra sundsk r 1470, 20,0969 59,9364 fi1400043 sand n * 60, 20,4414 60,0744 fi1400044 ngesj * 8, 19,7286 60,2764 fi1400045 n sg rdan 2,75 19,6788 60,2380 fi1400046 br nd (bovik) 0,5 19,6633 60,2872 fi1400047 signilsk r m rket * 21030, 19,2969 60,2497 fi1400049 l k * 11, 19,7194 60,3775 fi1400050 kattn s * 0,5 19,6889 60,1983 fi1400051 ut ngarna * 0,5 19,8653 60,1156 fi1400052 kasberget * 10, 19,9553 60,1422 fi1400053 blacksund * 24, 20,7908 60,3556 fi1400054 m rsk r 803, 21,1578 59,7708 fi1400055 karlbyb dar 716, 20,7358 59,7483 fi1400056 id brunnsk r * 56, 20,9294 59,8753 fi1400057 rsk r fj llsk r 6, 21,0275 59,9914 fi1400058 l gsk r * 1059, 19,9283 59,8397 fi1400059 s dra j rs * 32, 20,0092 60,0122 fi1400060 norra espholm * 0,5 19,9594 60,0669 fi1400061 v stra espholm * 9, 19,9553 60,0644 fi1400062 kn ppelsk r pargrund kr ksk r 103, 20,2425 60,4428 fi1400063 tob le * 0,46 20,0306 60,3685 fi1400064 rann 405, 20,2072 60,5333 fi1400065 stenverka * 38, 20,3714 60,3511 fi1400066 gloet * 28, 20,3181 60,3550 fi1400067 vikarsk ren 1505, 20,4692 60,3989 fi1400069 uddhagar 1 5,1 19,5569 60,1625 fi1400070 uddhagarna 2 6,6 19,5572 60,1575 fi1400071 del av lgh. 26:0, storby 0,5 19,5500 60,2275 fi1400072 del av g rdstomt i kyrkoby, ecker 0,5 19,6119 60,2131 fi1400073 del av stugtomt, torp, ecker 0,5 19,5161 60,1767 fi1400074 del av lgh. 17:1, torp/ecker 0,5 19,5356 60,1847 fi1400075 lillsundet * 7,5 19,6528 60,1706 fi1400076 gloviken 14,9 19,8233 60,2764 fi1400077 hus fj rden * 72,7 19,8375 60,2781 fi1400078 karltr sk 17, 19,7461 60,1853 fi1400079 moren 4, 19,8519 60,1689 fi1400080 del av lgh. jomala 6:0, jomala g rd 0,5 19,9853 60,1803 fi1400081 n set * 35, 20,7375 60,3347 fi1400083 del av oljehamnsomr det, mariehamn 0,5 19,9350 60,0847 fi1400084 del av lgh. 1:0, pr stg rden, sund * 50, 20,1125 60,2611 fi1400085 del av lgh. 6:20, bomarsund 0,5 20,2397 60,2119 fi1400086 del av lgh. 2:13, vargata 0,5 20,3542 60,2494 fi1400087 del av lgh. 2:13 vargata 0,5 20,3533 60,2497 fi1400088 del av lgh. 5:32, vargata 0,5 20,3475 60,2478 fi1400089 del av lgh. 2:16, l v 0,5 20,3486 60,2497 fi1400090 svenstj lpa * 195, 20,4186 60,2492 ltakm0002 ventos up 179 22,7022 56,1758 ltakm0003 purvi kaimo apylink s * 151 22,5906 56,1692 ltakm0004 u pelki pievos * 47 22,6631 56,1622 ltakm0005 gumbaki atodanga 1 22,8125 56,1306 ltakm0006 ventos up s sl nis auks iau papil s * 73 22,845 56,1031 ltakm0007 ventos up s sl nis emiau papil s * 78 22,765 56,1558 ltakm0008 ventos up s sl nis auk iau ventos * 13 22,7122 56,1744 ltakmb001 kaman pelk * 6401 22,645 56,2908 ltaly0001 vidzgirio mi kas 388 24,0286 54,3786 ltaly0002 nor n mi kas * 243 23,9847 54,2919 ltaly0004 punios ilas * 2702 24,0503 54,53 ltaly0005 uvinto e eras ir buktos mi kas * 15868 23,5489 54,4669 ltaly0006 sabali ki mi kas 130 23,939269 54,44547 ltany0001 vilkat n mi kas * 114 24,9836 55,4336 ltany0002 vyliaudi kio pelk 53 25,0408 55,4267 ltany0004 virintos up 833 25,0931 55,4106 ltany0009 variaus upelio sl nis 72 25,1053 55,5706 ltany0011 girel s mi kas * 69 25,1383 55,5061 ltany0012 anyk i ilelis * 1668 25,0356 55,4775 ltany0014 aliosios pievos 40 24,8092 55,5644 ltany0016 u urais i kaimo apylink s 118 24,7011 55,5519 ltany0019 rubiki e eras ir jo apye er s 1631 25,2858 55,4967 ltany0020 ventosios senvag s 203 25,0592 55,5739 ltany0021 baldono e ero apylink s * 197,4 25,103355 55,34218 ltany0022 gyki vaitk n pelk * 95,7 25,368877 55,72635 ltany0023 vie into e eras * 202,3 24,958345 55,68635 ltanyb001 imoni giria * 23263 25,175 55,6464 ltbir0002 daud giri mi kas * 164 24,6631 56,155 ltbir0003 nemun lio ir apa ios upi sl niai 296 24,8517 56,4208 ltbir0004 gipso karsto e erai ir j apye er s 1239 24,7031 56,2428 ltbir0005 karajimi kio kaimo apylink s 28 24,6969 56,2044 ltbir0007 dr seiki kaimo apylink s 35 24,7608 56,2378 ltbir0008 uolyn s mi kas * 92 24,7928 56,2453 ltbir0009 padai i mi kas * 61 24,635 56,2261 ltbirb001 bir giria 17 683,28 24,9547 56,2794 ltbrs0001 siponi atodanga 3 23,9997 54,5119 ltbrs0002 k voni atodanga 1 24,0028 54,6044 ltdru0003 avir s up 54 23,9425 54,0517 ltdru0004 drapali kaimo apylink s 3,6 23,9202 54,1703 ltdru0005 cimokin * 366,7 24,152696 53,99974 ltdru0006 vilko e eras ir jo apye eris * 120,1 23,806807 54,12558 ltele0001 paneri mi kas * 224 24,9339 54,8089 ltele0003 grabijol mi kas * 886 24,8842 54,8408 ltign0001 pu nies pelk 779 26,4464 55,4978 ltign0003 akeli k s pievos * 108 26,5372 55,3269 ltign0004 dietkau iznos pievos * 147 26,4656 55,3386 ltign0013 merkmenio e eras 46 26,2847 55,2328 ltign0017 gervel s pelk * 235 26,4475 55,4536 ltign0018 auk taitijos nacionalinis parkas * 33048 26,0067 55,3711 ltign0026 r o e eras 59 26,4942 55,4842 ltign0027 sungardo e eras 117 26,12 55,4944 ltign0028 birv tos up s sl nis ties rimaldi ke * 113 26,8067 55,2808 ltign0032 dysnos up s sl niai 460 26,6783 55,3283 ltign0033 kaziti kio pelk 101 26,1339 55,4342 ltign0034 mila iaus ir puzarauskin s mi kai * 655,8 26,489517 55,22935 ltign0035 vyt n pelk * 266,7 26,561294 55,30462 ltjoa0001 ventosios up s sl nis ties upninkais * 106 24,4936 55,0875 ltjoa0002 irvintos up ir jos sl niai 1030 24,6178 55,0697 ltjoa0003 pa uolyn s durpynas 76 24,4972 55,14 ltjoa0005 ilo mi kas 195 24,25 55,2561 ltjoa0006 gai i nai * 530 24,3711 55,0158 ltjoa0007 didelis mi kas * 9,6 24,169086 55,22797 ltjoa0008 lomena ir verkstin * 540,1 24,434477 54,99898 ltjoi0001 m os tyrelio mi kas * 1 675,6 23,224263 56,2143 ltjoi0002 vilkijos up s sl nis 64 23,4069 56,3453 ltjoi0003 mi kas prie dilbin li * 57 23,1831 56,3053 ltjoi0004 agar s mi kas * 1247 23,2283 56,2878 ltjoi0007 agar s ozas 49 23,2161 56,3483 ltjoi0008 pabali mi kas ir v t s up s sl nis * 61 23,3094 56,3792 ltjoi0009 vilkiau io mi kas * 124 23,555 56,1894 ltjoi0010 satk n mi kas * 106,7 23,665054 56,28832 ltjonb001 m os tyrelio pelk * 1700 23,2242 56,2064 ltjur0001 sered iaus pievos 11 23,405 55,0883 ltjur0002 gystaus up s sl nis * 146,97 23,2431 55,0936 ltjur0003 ilin s apylink s * 37 22,9483 55,0906 ltjur0004 klangi pievos 31 23,3039 55,0778 ltjur0005 armenos atodangos * 218,1 23,3528 55,0892 ltjur0006 balandin s pelk 160 22,7178 55,2344 ltjur0007 bau ai i pelk * 259 22,6756 55,2375 ltjur0008 kar uvos giria 37194 22,4633 55,1406 ltjur0009 laukesa i * 1187 22,5717 55,1908 ltjur0010 margupio kadagynas 25 23,4664 55,1481 ltjur0011 altuonos up s sl nis * 66 22,7822 55,26 ltjur0012 mituvos sl nis emiau pauli * 148 23,0239 55,1817 ltjur0013 nemuno sl nis ties kalveliais * 444 22,4403 55,0542 ltjur0014 nemuno sl nis ties pal kiais * 597 22,6214 55,0619 ltjur0015 lapgiri mi kas * 143 22,8333 55,2564 ltkai0001 kaukin s mi kas * 1135 24,4681 54,7142 ltkai0002 str vinink mi kas 194 24,3458 54,8114 ltkai0004 vaiguvos mi kas * 665 24,2156 54,7783 ltkai0005 b dos-pravieni ki mi kas * 1004 24,3403 54,8961 ltkai0006 lapainios sl nis * 221 24,1828 54,7336 ltkai0008 stro i n ilas 53 24,5831 54,8011 ltkai0009 palaraistis * 346,4 24,384495 54,96428 ltkal0001 liubavo kaimo apylink s 153 23,0297 54,355 ltkau0001 ringov s mi kai * 215 23,5222 55,0528 ltkau0002 nev io emupys * 1092 23,7947 54,975 ltkau0003 kam os mi kas * 321 23,8139 54,8994 ltkau0007 kauno marios * 9027 24,1386 54,8558 ltkau0008 milikoni fortas 2 23,8847 54,9175 ltkau0009 agari ki fortas 6 23,8644 54,8833 ltkau0010 julijanavos fortas 5 23,8772 54,8619 ltkau0011 naujosios fredos fortas 6 23,9072 54,8508 ltkau0012 rok fortas 8 23,9544 54,8494 ltkau0013 dubravos sengir * 120 24,0728 54,8497 ltkau0014 jiesios up ir jos sl niai * 448 23,9269 54,8333 ltkau0020 kauno uolynas * 61 23,9447 54,8994 ltkau0022 padauguvos mi kas * 735 23,7375 55,0692 ltkau0024 babt -varluvos mi kai * 349 23,8775 55,0114 ltkau0026 pakarkl s mi kas * 239 23,6008 55,0178 ltkau0028 romaini uolynas * 37 23,82 54,9261 ltkau0029 aluonos up ir jos sl niai * 193,7 23,756276 55,15936 ltkaz0004 vi akio up s sl nis * 112 23,4667 54,8442 ltkaz0005 kazl r dos mi kas * 359,2 23,425371 54,77515 ltked0001 lab navos mi kas 401 23,9572 55,1478 ltked0002 dvari ki kaimo apylink s * 385 24,2464 55,4686 ltked0003 nev io up s sl nis ties ventybras iu 10 24,0447 55,4189 ltked0004 klamput 12 23,8869 55,2961 ltked0005 r neiki mi kas * 57 24,3431 55,3336 ltked0006 vosbu i kaimo apylink s * 154 23,6508 55,3642 ltked0009 bakainiai * 31 24,0292 55,4667 ltked0010 geln mi kas * 234 24,0158 55,13 ltked0012 ilgatrakio mi kas * 186 24,1947 55,3339 ltked0014 josvaini mi kas * 25 23,7978 55,3381 ltked0021 barup s sl niai 31 23,9961 55,2114 ltked0022 vik rupio auk tupys 108 23,7683 55,2233 ltked0023 kalnaber s mi kas * 11,5 23,954499 55,40788 ltked0024 skaist s pelk * 104,5 24,142403 55,41302 ltked0025 u v s up ir jos apylink s * 180 23,6428 55,4171 ltked0026 glau i kaimo apylink s * 193,1 24,314742 55,28242 ltkel0001 pak vio mi kas * 451 22,8272 55,6964 ltkel0002 galvydi k s kaimo apylink s * 964 22,9822 55,7836 ltkel0003 smirdel s pelk * 26 23,0219 55,7972 ltkel0006 svil s altiniai 2 22,9419 55,8411 ltkel0007 im mi kas * 2089 23,2031 55,67 ltkel0010 apu io e eras ir jo apye er s 96 23,1928 55,6208 ltkel0012 iluvos tyrelis * 254 23,2425 55,5633 ltkel0013 papu ynio mi kas * 263 23,3406 55,5589 ltkel0014 juodl s mi kas * 956 22,9378 55,8114 ltkel0015 gudmoni k s pelk 100 22,9347 55,8728 ltkel0017 vijurk pievos * 74 23,0925 55,7456 ltkel0020 karalmi kio sengir * 409 22,9775 55,7628 ltkel0021 uki k s mi kas * 157 23,0203 55,6617 ltkel0022 karkl n e eras ir jo apye er s * 45 22,588606 55,64525 ltkel0023 paginski kaimo apylink s * 161,6 22,712517 55,65823 ltkel0024 pamed iokalnio mi kas * 77,4 22,696469 55,61478 ltkel0025 perdal s e eras 4,6 22,934331 55,67402 ltkel0026 tyklio e eras ir tykl s mi kas * 94 22,583948 55,75745 ltkla0001 svencel s pelk * 1207 21,295 55,4839 ltkla0003 minijos up s sl nis * 1621 21,4342 55,7756 ltkla0004 kint pievos ir mi kai * 519 21,2586 55,4447 ltkla0005 lu ijos ir tyr pelk s * 2687 21,2244 55,5606 ltkla0006 veivir o up s sl nis * 1729 21,5119 55,5256 ltkla0007 minijos up 1870 21,4894 55,745 ltkla0009 paj rio kopos 425 21,0658 55,8483 ltkla0010 veivir o ir alp s up s 1714 21,5844 55,5997 ltkre0001 sud n pievos 110 21,215 56,0906 ltkre0002 minijos sl nis ties dyburiais * 754 21,5597 55,9483 ltkre0003 nasr n pievos 21 21,5261 55,9889 ltkre0004 senosios pilties apylink s 70 21,23 56,1114 ltkre0005 salanto ir blend iavos up s 241 21,5875 55,9992 ltkre0006 baltijos ventosios up 27 21,1439 56,0756 ltkre0007 gr lauk s mi kas * 509,7 21,440046 56,04085 ltkre0008 kra tin s mi kas * 69 21,317993 55,83256 ltkup0001 kepurin s pelk * 700 25,2275 55,78 ltkup0002 sakoni bala * 61 25,1983 55,7531 ltkup0003 notigal s pelk * 1391 25,305 55,9494 ltkup0004 skapagirio mi kas 2161 25,2592 55,9039 ltkup0005 l vens up s sl nis * 862 24,8647 55,8053 ltkup0006 buo i kaimo apylink s * 14,1 24,89812 55,96012 ltkup0007 mirabelio mi kas * 98,1 25,06173 55,87122 ltlaz0001 ku iuli k s kaimo apylink s 146 23,9011 54,1889 ltlaz0003 krakinio pelk * 157 23,5158 54,0033 ltlaz0010 meteli regioninis parkas * 17024 23,7097 54,2853 ltlaz0015 liubelio mi kas * 146 23,6344 54,1414 ltlaz0016 balsio e eras 44 23,6597 54,1436 ltlaz0017 morkavo up s sl nio pievos * 7 23,7217 54,1417 ltlaz0019 li nelio e eras ir jo apye er s * 45 23,6631 54,1272 ltlaz0020 petro k mi kas * 739 23,6214 54,1131 ltlaz0021 an ios e ero iaurin apye er * 17 23,6917 54,1089 ltlaz0022 lavant l s up s sl nis * 4 23,6689 54,0978 ltlaz0023 dainavi ki pelk s * 58 23,6681 54,085 ltlaz0025 ilginink mi ko dalis * 86 23,6872 54,0389 ltlaz0026 ilgio e eras (i) 66 23,7417 54,0381 ltlaz0033 snaigyno e eras 206 23,7361 54,0919 ltlaz0035 marg kaimo apylink s 11 23,9269 54,1472 ltlaz0036 stank n kaimo apylink s 64 23,6242 54,1789 ltlaz0037 bestraigi ki kaimo apylink s 62,1 23,7936 54,1783 ltlaz0039 stra i n kaimo apylink s 50 23,9572 54,1425 ltlaz0040 lavant kaimo apylink s 8 23,665759 54,1566 ltlaz0041 avi ieni mi kas 14,7 23,6986 54,1829 ltlaz0042 paveisiej kaimo apylink s 11,5 23,5929 54,1017 ltlaz0043 grynaraistis * 15,4 23,752331 53,99416 ltlaz0044 juodo kauknorio e eras * 61,5 23,54507 54,02388 ltmar0001 uol b dos mi kas * 860 23,5672 54,7261 ltmar0006 grandai * 15 23,1161 54,3858 ltmar0007 varnab d s mi kas * 112,3 23,657794 54,6409 ltmaz0001 vi et s up 1,59 22,2967 56,2939 ltmaz0004 svirkan i atodanga 0,15 22,5292 56,1803 ltmaz0005 dautar mi kas * 178 21,9856 56,3661 ltmaz0008 vidgirio mi kas 33 22,1328 56,1406 ltmaz0009 varduvos up 469 22,0639 56,2019 ltmaz0010 erk n s up 230 22,2169 56,3289 ltmaz0011 purvi mi kas * 121 22,6122 56,1725 ltmaz0012 maig mi kas * 120,9 22,513918 56,28908 ltmaz0013 daugini kaimo apylink s * 64,5 22,551994 56,14681 ltmol0010 labanoro regioninis parkas * 53198 25,7436 55,2222 ltmol0012 vilkarais io mi kas * 670 25,33 55,1417 ltner0005 kur i nerija * 9986 21,0639 55,4761 ltner0006 sambijos plynauk t 25041 0 0 ltpak0001 kruojos up s sl niai 195 23,9097 56,0169 ltpak0004 laumenio mi kas * 645 24,0528 56,1781 ltpal0001 baltijos j ros priekrant 12634 20,9981 55,8947 ltpal0002 klaip dos-ventspilio plynauk t 17948 0 0 ltpan0001 naudvario mi kas * 68 24,0375 55,7531 ltpan0002 nev io ir kir ino upi santaka 7 24,1336 55,6622 ltpan0003 nev io up s sl nis ties vadakt liais * 79 24,12 55,6192 ltpan0004 gringali mi kas 479 24,0994 55,5092 ltpan0005 pa ili pelk 336 24,2275 55,5492 ltpan0006 alioji giria 33870 24,56 55,8342 ltpan0008 skilvioni mi kas 48 24,0319 55,5483 ltpan0010 nev io up s sl nis ties vadakt liais ii * 32 24,1275 55,6431 ltpan0011 nev io sl nis ties dembava 18 24,0586 55,4833 ltpan0012 nev io vidurupio sl nis * 320 24,1064 55,5531 ltpan0013 liele erio ir pa ili e ero kompleksas * 64,1 24,22736 55,51007 ltpas0001 lep yn s mi kas * 207 24,2236 55,9892 ltpas0002 pam iai * 478 24,4467 56,1311 ltpas0003 m os sl nis emiau raudonpam io 77 24,1094 56,0683 ltpas0004 pyvesos up s sl nis emiau rink n 114 24,4319 55,9783 ltpas0005 gr i mi kas * 79 24,2256 56,0964 ltplu0009 emaitijos nacionalinis parkas * 17 912,7 21,8858 56,0458 ltplu0010 rietavo mi kai * 30109 21,6633 55,7933 ltplu0011 sausdravo up 310 21,9564 55,8603 ltplu0012 stalg n pievos * 21 21,8775 55,8353 ltplu0013 gandingos apylink s 255 21,7694 55,8956 ltplu0014 vainai i tyras (stalgo pelk ) * 148 21,92 55,8325 ltpri0002 verkn s up s sl nis * 594 24,0986 54,5972 ltpri0004 tartoko pelk 33 23,9708 54,6547 ltpri0005 revuonos i takos * 23 23,9117 54,6161 ltpri0007 balbieri kio atodanga 8 23,8847 54,5356 ltpri0009 vizdijos up s sl nis * 199 23,9533 54,525 ltpri0010 nemuno kilpos 1346 24,0142 54,5789 ltpri0011 r dgiri pelk 26 23,9158 54,6694 ltpri0012 verkn s vidurupys * 419 24,3992 54,5453 ltpri0013 prien ilas * 469 23,9303 54,5867 ltpri0014 o ven ios up ir jos sl niai * 432 24,0439 54,6619 ltpri0015 balbieri kio mi kas 529 23,8194 54,5283 ltpri0017 skriaud i kaimo apylink s * 197,5 23,670386 54,72872 ltrad0001 pravir ulio tyrelis * 3316 23,4606 55,5308 ltrad0002 strazdyn * 194 23,73 55,5569 ltrad0003 mi kini mi kas * 21 23,3522 55,5706 ltrad0004 radviloni mi kas * 157 23,7492 55,8011 ltrad0005 kurkli mi kas 224 23,8181 55,7331 ltrad0006 liepin s mi kas * 151,8 23,467954 55,78279 ltrad0007 pelyt s pelk * 183,7 23,335129 55,71137 ltrad0008 u v s up ir jos sl niai * 474,3 23,540496 55,64458 ltras0001 jukaini mi kas * 267 22,9331 55,4353 ltras0002 dubysos up emiau lyduv n 1052 23,3539 55,3078 ltras0003 spandot pievos 75 23,2536 55,4019 ltras0004 ugioni pievos * 16 23,3475 55,3206 ltras0005 e uvies up s sl nis emiau molav n * 308 22,8536 55,4444 ltras0006 dubysos up s laitas ties maslauski kiais * 19 23,3025 55,37 ltras0007 bal ios up 451 22,7831 55,45 ltrie0001 aitros up 582 22,0261 55,6544 ltrie0002 lopai i mi kas * 398,9 22,190944 55,75592 ltrie0003 natalkos e ero apylink s * 23 22,21885 55,745 ltrok0001 petrio i kio pelk * 140 25,4594 55,8264 ltrok0002 brad si kadagynas 3 25,8622 55,8322 ltrok0003 gaid iabal s samanyn 172 25,5908 56,125 ltrok0004 konstantinavos pelk 82 25,3408 56,0678 ltrok0006 bar n pelk 24 25,8331 55,8464 ltrok0007 duset giria * 656 25,7936 55,7889 ltrok0009 altojos up s sl nis 133 25,6767 56,0406 ltrok0015 suvaini kio mi kas * 1193 25,2383 56,1481 ltrok0019 mink n durpynas 95 25,7397 55,7886 ltrok0020 a ukriaunio mi kas * 254,4 25,9338 55,9827 ltsak0001 nemuno sl nio skroblynai nuo kriuk iki gelgaudi kio * 1 363,1 23,2461 55,0625 ltsak0002 nemuno up panemuni regioniniame parke 953 23,2231 55,0825 ltsak0003 e up ir jos sl niai * 258 22,856262 54,86138 ltsal0001 kernavo pelk * 1449 25,1397 54,3789 ltsal0002 gaujos up s sl nis * 483 25,7078 54,1747 ltsal0003 stak mi kas * 693 25,5531 54,3028 ltsal0004 visin ios up s sl nis ties gudeliais * 21 25,2583 54,3703 ltsal0006 jurgelioni pievos 7 25,6639 54,2406 ltsal0010 merkio pievos ties pamerkiu * 8 25,5494 54,4278 ltsal0011 merkio sl nis ties turgeliais * 3 25,5225 54,4519 ltsal0012 al ios ir visin ios upi sl niai * 531 25,0603 54,3186 ltsal0013 r dnink vir ynai 841 25,0878 54,3875 ltsalb003 baltosios vok s lap em s 1 391,28 25,1253 54,4903 ltsia0001 lyg * 191,7 23,0558 55,7789 ltsia0002 pag luvio e erynas * 132 23,0961 55,8044 ltsia0003 bul n pelk * 115,3 23,0425 55,8733 ltsia0004 paraud i mi kas * 101 23,1081 55,8294 ltsia0005 r kyvos pelk * 2560 23,2761 55,8547 ltsia0006 varput n mi kas 289 22,8917 55,8969 ltsia0007 dubysos up s sl nis ties bazilionais 59 23,1628 55,8083 ltsia0008 gel s mi kas * 949,1 22,685624 56,03966 ltsia0009 vendr s mi kas * 262,5 23,136975 55,91383 ltsil0002 gojaus skroblynai 12 22,3742 55,6142 ltsil0003 medv galio pievos 45 22,39 55,6278 ltsil0005 aliosios mi kas * 581 21,83 55,5064 ltsil0006 j ros up s sl niai * 16,9 22,029844 55,39444 ltsil0007 upynos kaimo apylink s * 572,5 22,406721 55,45435 ltsir0001 astruvkos mi kas * 427 24,665 54,9986 ltsir0002 gervirais io pelk * 198 24,9719 54,8956 ltsir0003 alioni pelk * 2096 25,1708 55,0225 ltsir0004 e uol li mi kas * 509 25,0597 55,0911 ltsir0005 irvintos up s sl niai * 212,1 24,706129 55,0136 ltsiu0001 plein s pelk * 277 21,6742 55,2075 ltsiu0003 ragain s vingis 689 22,0617 55,04 ltsiu0004 ereitlaukio mi kas * 1481 22,0758 55,0392 ltsiu0010 j ros up emiau taurag s 607 22,19 55,1511 ltsiu0012 kur i marios * 37 909,9 21,1614 55,3917 ltsiu0013 nemuno delta * 23921 21,365 55,3225 ltsiu0015 nemuno up rambyno regioniniame parke 214 22,0683 55,0419 ltsiu0016 graumena ir jos sl niai * 273,4 21,697247 55,52821 ltsiu0017 norkai i mi kas * 518,5 21,54195 55,44881 ltsku0001 ventosios up s sl nis ties margininkais * 146 21,2531 56,165 ltsku0002 aukli riedulynas * 82 21,5961 56,1247 ltsku0003 kulali riedulynas * 59 21,6375 56,1328 ltsku0004 rim in s mi kas 26 21,6092 56,1133 ltsku0005 luobos up 458 21,6594 56,26 ltsku0007 laumi mi kas * 254 21,8708 56,2022 ltsku0008 ve i mi kas * 15,4 21,375903 56,18495 ltsku0009 vir il mi kas * 324,6 21,771729 56,32886 ltsve0001 acinto ir per no pelk s * 1036 25,9619 54,9917 ltsve0002 aduti kio pelk * 4076 26,7072 55,2506 ltsve0003 baltasaman s pelk * 606 25,9175 54,9447 ltsve0004 algird n pelk * 91 25,7397 54,9108 ltsve0008 meros up ir jos sl nis 134 25,8844 55,0078 ltsve0016 s tik s up ir jos sl nis 59 26,2653 55,1703 ltsve0018 merge erio e eras 12 26,2669 55,2228 ltsve0019 ilgio e eras (ii) 17 26,2708 55,2031 ltsve0020 eimenos up 1025 25,8625 55,0744 ltsve0024 sarios up 88 25,9103 55,0478 ltsve0026 salo io e eras 90 26,2258 55,1967 ltsve0032 nevers i mi kas * 11 26,2931 55,2011 ltsve0033 kretuono e eras ir jo apylink s * 1972 26,0836 55,2478 ltsve0035 geledn s mi kas * 523 26,0431 54,9597 ltsve0036 kretuonyk io e eras ir apye eris 321 26,1489 55,2564 ltsve0037 guntaunink mi kas 1594 26,6258 55,2353 ltsve0038 eituni k s pelk ir lygiaraistis * 154,1 25,817688 54,92583 ltsveb005 asvejos e erynas * 10 821,9 25,5097 55,0356 ltsveb009 pabrad s smiltpiev s 409,81 25,8067 55,0464 lttau0001 an ios up s sl nis * 338 22,5397 55,3764 lttau0006 vie vil s auk tupio pelkynas * 5693 22,4378 55,1461 lttau0007 e uvies up emiau pa e uvio * 899 22,4497 55,2556 lttau0008 pagraman io regioninis parkas * 11466 22,2044 55,3636 lttau0009 me k pievos 148 22,3439 55,2072 lttau0013 norki k s mi kas * 56 22,555 55,3622 lttau0014 dabrupin s miskas * 115 22,0986 55,3189 lttau0018 altai i kaimo apylink s * 72 22,2183 55,2156 lttel0001 germanto e eras 164 22,1442 55,9792 lttel0002 saloto e eras ir jo apye er s 306 22,2644 55,8314 lttel0005 par e erio l ksto pelki kompleksas * 2867 22,3153 55,6861 lttel0006 ankant pelk 420 22,2808 55,8089 lttel0007 sydeklio pelk * 157 22,3581 55,8642 lttel0009 moterai io pievos 16 22,5 55,7647 lttel0010 atrijos pievos 26 22,5583 55,8736 lttel0011 gel io e eras 23 22,125 55,9889 lttel0013 pagirg du io mi kas * 144 22,5183 55,7 lttel0014 sprud s pievos 23 22,49 55,7844 lttel0015 kstai i kaimo apylink s * 732,7 22,129384 56,02645 lttel0016 virvyt s up ir jos apylink s * 348,3 22,534215 56,021 lttra0001 jurgioni mi kas * 659 24,5036 54,4697 lttra0002 kiliet e er apylink s * 91 24,5203 54,6164 lttra0003 solio e eras ir jo apye er s * 235 24,6308 54,5642 lttra0004 ydkaimio pelk s 100 24,7269 54,5072 lttra0005 skrebio mi kas 119 24,5567 54,5861 lttra0006 mergi ki mi kas 156 24,4944 54,6103 lttra0007 spind iaus mi kas * 1382 24,6789 54,5742 lttra0009 bra uol s up ir jos sl nis * 23 24,9522 54,7564 lttra0012 skais io e eras 288 24,9744 54,6633 lttra0016 biti ki e eras 33 24,8419 54,6692 lttra0017 akies e eras ir jo apye er s 8 24,9528 54,6467 lttra0018 irmuko e eras 5 24,9322 54,6153 lttra0019 varnik mi kas * 435 24,9719 54,6444 lttra0020 plom n pelk * 426 24,9081 54,6436 lttra0021 mo ios e eras 39 24,5728 54,5986 lttra0022 kiemeli ki kaimo apylink s * 94 25,0389 54,6756 lttra0023 bra uol s up s sl niai ties grati k mis 132 24,8825 54,7119 lttra0024 aliosios kaimo apylink s * 38 24,6483 54,5239 lttra0025 verpi ki e er liai * 17 24,8733 54,785 lttra0026 bra uol s up s sl nis emiau vil ni ki 29 24,87 54,7489 lttra0029 ubi ki mi kas 231 24,5956 54,5997 lttra0031 pauk teli ki kaimo apylink s 16 24,5372 54,6083 lttra0032 alsaki mi kas * 12 24,8631 54,6342 lttra0033 bra uol s up s i takos * 43 24,8964 54,6808 ltukm0001 dukstynos mi kas 46 24,8458 55,2811 ltukm0002 ventosios up emiau andrioni kio 1628 24,8039 55,3044 ltukm0004 kazimieravos pelk * 73 25,0125 55,1889 ltukm0005 siesarties up ir jos sl nis 196 24,92 55,2867 ltukm0006 svirplin s pelk 24 25,0814 55,2364 ltukm0007 ventosios up s sl nio pievos 5 24,8753 55,3044 ltukm0008 viliuk mi kas 909 24,5283 55,2444 ltukm0009 dirvon e er liai ir pelk s 35 24,6914 55,2358 ltukm0010 adomi kio pelk 52 25,2236 55,1781 ltukm0011 gemeli kio kaimo pievos 7 24,9933 55,165 ltukm0012 siesarties up ties valais 406 25,0161 55,2931 ltukm0015 petra i n mi kas * 57 24,9064 55,2169 ltukm0016 uvint s up ir jos sl niai * 233,7 24,652086 55,13815 ltukmb001 tauj n u ul nio mi kai 22 531,6 24,5803 55,3986 ltute0006 ali pelk 26 25,7039 55,4819 ltute0010 a uolijos mi kas * 115 25,5736 55,4556 ltute0011 vy uon ilas 7 25,5331 55,5917 ltute0012 gegu iakalnio mi kas * 291,5 25,822944 55,4113 ltute0013 samany ios pelk * 48,4 25,974102 55,53699 ltvar0001 spenglos up ir jos sl nis 254,03 24,7811 54,3458 ltvar0009 epkeli pelk * 12752 24,5225 54,0003 ltvar0011 merkio up 2224 24,8867 54,3367 ltvar0012 los up emiau rudnios 419 24,4986 54,1156 ltvar0015 dere nos up 137 24,4875 54,1992 ltvar0016 versekos up 253 24,8208 54,2839 ltvar0017 dainavos giria * 54833 24,2778 54,0992 ltvar0018 geidukoni pelk 68 24,4844 54,3306 ltvar0019 dir ameni pelk 75 24,5481 54,4039 ltvar0025 stoj pievos 193 24,7631 54,0128 ltvar0026 nedzing s ir amarnios up s 19 24,3242 54,2475 ltvar0028 merkio ir al ios upi santaka * 70 24,8297 54,3431 ltvar0029 versekos up s sl nis ties kr miniais * 50 24,81 54,3106 ltvar0030 burokarais io e eras * 39,2 24,34379 54,20604 ltvar0031 nedzingio e eras * 278,7 24,328777 54,28089 ltvar0032 rady iaus kaimo apylink s 11,039 24,0434 54,1273 ltvik0001 virbalgirio mi kas * 368 22,8117 54,6022 ltvik0002 drausgirio mi kas * 595 22,7722 54,4972 ltvik0003 pavi ty io pievos 23 22,7839 54,4122 ltvik0004 grybingirio mi kas * 372 22,8386 54,4061 ltvik0005 tadarin s ir vi tytgirio mi kai * 1176 22,8114 54,4644 ltvik0007 peleni kaimo apylink s 47 23,0853 54,4486 ltvik0008 kylinink pievos * 109 22,7744 54,5214 ltvik0009 vygris ir ber inis 36 22,926328 54,41733 ltvin0001 taurijos mi kas * 506 25,6053 54,7622 ltvin0002 veicarijos mi kas * 792 25,4581 54,5797 ltvin0003 medinink pievos * 16 25,6586 54,5353 ltvin0005 pravalo e eras ir jo apye er s * 99 25,6689 54,9578 ltvin0006 raudonoji bala * 135 25,2247 54,8533 ltvin0007 d k t uolynas ir d k tos up s sl nis * 363 24,9617 54,8383 ltvin0008 ali j e er apylink s * 130 25,325 54,79 ltvin0009 neries up 2399 24,7728 54,89 ltvin0010 rie s up s sl nis 37 25,31 54,7894 ltvin0011 e er li kompleksas 190,8 25,3106 54,7692 ltvin0012 neries up s laitas ties verkiais * 7 25,2956 54,7489 ltvin0013 giedraiti ki pelk * 73 25,1822 54,8639 ltvin0014 auk t j paneri gele inkelio tunelis 2,454 25,1933 54,6319 ltvin0015 antakalnio bunkeriai 1 25,3328 54,7008 ltvin0016 sukti ki mi ko dalis 7 25,5678 54,7964 ltvin0017 gegu in s pelk 43 25,565 54,9186 ltvin0018 girijos mi kas * 127 25,3056 54,9031 ltvin0020 kry iok mi kas * 172 25,3219 54,7717 ltvin0023 svili ki kaimo apylink s 1320 25,0014 54,7367 ltvin0024 vilnios up 13 25,5475 54,7361 ltvin0025 kenos up * 221 25,5469 54,6264 ltvin0030 vanagyn s mi kas * 44 25,2497 54,7764 ltvin0032 vilnios up s sl nis ties mick nais * 101 25,5242 54,7125 ltvin0033 jusin s up 26 25,6306 54,9431 ltvin0034 lavori ki mi kas * 2 277,9 25,715388 54,73923 ltvin0035 kaukysos up s sl nis * 47,9 25,3184 54,6622 ltvin0036 vilnios laitai ties p koriais * 15,2 25,360526 54,68648 ltzar0002 pelk tos ra e ero pakrant s 75 25,74 55,7722 ltzar0003 gip n kaimo apylink s 14 25,8358 55,8058 ltzar0004 padust lio pelk s 107 25,8431 55,7358 ltzar0005 balnio e eras ir jo apye er s 14 25,8881 55,7608 ltzar0006 glio ir glioko e erai 15 25,8822 55,7686 ltzar0007 ilga ilis * 346 25,8767 55,7797 ltzar0008 vyko e ero apye er s 86 25,9314 55,7786 ltzar0011 antazav s ilas * 179 25,8997 55,8133 ltzar0022 velniabal * 119 26,0019 55,7067 ltzar0023 samani pelk 112 26,0386 55,9394 ltzar0024 gra ut s regioninis parkas * 26101 26,1397 55,6219 ltzar0025 smalvos ir smalvyk io e erai ir pelk s * 2225 26,3819 55,6186 ltzar0026 smalvel s up ir lap em s 547 26,4556 55,6358 ltzar0027 zalv s pelk 16 25,8783 55,8192 ltzar0028 zalv s up s sl nis 7 25,8958 55,8214 ltzar0029 dr k i e eras 3612 26,5825 55,6219 ltzar0030 pu ios pelk 88 26,0983 55,6808 ltzar0032 melatin l s up s sl nis * 10 25,905 55,77 lv0000110 augstroze * 4007 0 25,0231 57,5375 lv0000120 vidusburtnieks * 1333 0 25,2597 57,7831 lv0000130 ziemelu purvi * 7718 0 24,8586 57,9711 lv0100200 moricsalas dabas rezervats * 818 0 22,1297 57,1931 lv0100300 grinu dabas rezervats * 1491 0 21,2047 56,8028 lv0100400 krustkalnu dabas rezervats * 2979 0 26,1567 56,7539 lv0100500 teicu dabas rezervats * 19779 0 26,4764 56,6211 lv0200100 gaujas nacionalais parks * 91790 0 25,1397 57,2908 lv0200200 kemeru nacionalais parks * 36 186,77 0 23,4567 56,9303 lv0200300 sliteres nacionalais parks * 16361 0 22,4133 57,6836 lv0300100 daugavas ieleja * 1044 0 25,1586 56,6097 lv0300400 silene * 3825 0 26,7561 55,7108 lv0300700 tervete * 1386 0 23,4044 56,4828 lv0300800 sauka * 5603 0 25,4997 56,2639 lv0300900 dridza ezers * 2597 0 27,2878 55,9808 lv0301100 riezupe * 455 0 22,0014 56,9981 lv0301200 embute * 462 0 21,8117 56,5103 lv0301300 istras pauguraine * 867 0 28,0347 56,2714 lv0301500 cirisa ezers * 1275 0 26,9706 56,1342 lv0301600 adamovas ezers * 761 0 27,3964 56,565 lv0301700 piejura * 4141 0 24,1897 57,1136 lv0301800 beberbeki * 269 0 23,9389 56,9428 lv0301900 dolessala * 1044 0 24,2347 56,8558 lv0302000 talsu pauguraine * 3624 0 22,6542 57,2353 lv0302100 abavas senleja * 14797 0 22,4514 57,0797 lv0302200 salacas ieleja * 6251 0 24,6956 57,855 lv0302800 engures ezers * 12579 0 23,1458 57,26 lv0302900 dvietes paliene * 4989 0 26,2378 56,0603 lv0303000 numernes valnis * 981 0 27,4764 56,8419 lv0303100 carmana ezers * 529 0 27,18 56,0467 lv0303200 svetes paliene 932 0 23,6656 56,7083 lv0303300 ragakapa * 150 0 23,9083 56,9981 lv0303400 raznas nacionalais parks * 59615 0 27,5053 56,2711 lv0303500 pape * 10853 0 20,9181 56,1667 lv0303600 bernati * 795 0 20,9508 56,3564 lv0303700 driksnas sils * 676 0 26,1919 56,6842 lv0303800 pinku ezers * 161 0 21,695 56,9972 lv0304000 laukezers * 327 0 26,0144 56,4928 lv0304100 bauska * 893 0 24,11 56,4169 lv0304200 kuja * 10788 0 26,3897 56,8703 lv0304400 kurjanovas ezers 262 0 27,9867 56,5319 lv0304500 ogres ieleja * 7516 0 25,3825 56,8289 lv0304800 vecumu mezi * 7842 0 27,8089 57,2517 lv0304900 vilce * 144 0 23,5328 56,4239 lv0305000 zvardes mezi * 8173 0 22,6114 56,4983 lv0305100 aiviekstes paliene * 1155 0 26,1778 56,7092 lv0305200 ogres zilie kalni * 309 0 24,5625 56,8353 lv0400400 korkulu sausgultne un pazemes upe * 22,4 0 25,2481 56,5669 lv0401000 kalamecu markuzu gravas * 28 0 26,4442 57,5442 lv0401900 stiglavas atsegumi * 15 0 27,5686 57,0411 lv0402200 skaistkalnes karsta kritenes * 96 0 24,69 56,3897 lv0402300 kulsenu avots 8,85 0 24,4889 56,4314 lv0412900 ogres dolomitu krauja * 4 0 24,6586 56,8181 lv0413300 ezernieku karsta kritenes * 52 0 24,8125 57,0861 lv0415600 zanas lejtece * 55,56 0 22,1453 56,4717 lv0415700 pavaru atsegumi * 2,9 0 22,1336 56,6881 lv0500100 skibu purvs * 536 0 25,3361 56,7431 lv0500200 gasparsona purvs * 27 0 25,0469 56,5433 lv0500300 ellites purvs * 4 0 25,2606 56,4869 lv0500500 dunezera purvs * 4 0 24,8814 56,5703 lv0500600 serzu tirelis * 152 0 24,8461 56,5036 lv0500700 vaveres ezers * 225 0 24,8031 56,5525 lv0500800 mazzalvites purvs * 272 0 25,1672 56,3517 lv0500900 indzera ezera salas * 6 0 27,0008 57,3856 lv0501000 gaujienas priedes * 48 0 26,4069 57,5078 lv0501100 lepuru purvs * 325 0 26,4167 57,5592 lv0501200 sloku purvs * 528 0 26,4394 57,5067 lv0501300 bejas mezs * 60 0 27,1672 57,3969 lv0501500 kupravas liepu audze * 33 0 27,5003 57,2781 lv0501600 tetersalas purvs * 344 0 26,5631 57,5058 lv0502100 baltais purvs * 124 0 27,1581 57,5228 lv0502200 orlovas (erglu) purvs * 3229 0 27,4053 57,0144 lv0502300 pokratas ezers * 52 0 27,225 56,9608 lv0502400 zodanu purvs * 96 0 27,5906 57,2686 lv0502600 stompaku purvi * 3885 0 27,4731 57,1006 lv0502800 zalezera purvs * 329 0 24,5603 56,4711 lv0502900 islice 2 0 24,1117 56,2833 lv0503000 kaleju tirelis * 41 0 24,5644 56,6511 lv0503300 raunas staburags * 22 0 25,6081 57,3217 lv0504000 tiras sunas purvs * 33 0 26,6444 55,9922 lv0504300 baltmuizas purvs * 874 0 25,8572 56,0569 lv0504400 sasalu mezs * 199 0 26,3117 55,93 lv0504700 viku purvs * 879 0 22,9089 56,5297 lv0504800 lielais purvs * 150 0 26,1925 57,2767 lv0505200 lacu purvs * 206 0 23,9767 56,6856 lv0505400 aizdumbles purvs * 392 0 25,5722 56,1578 lv0505500 supes purvs * 698 0 25,6519 56,2786 lv0505600 nomavas purvs * 1282 0 25,7256 56,305 lv0505700 klaucanu un priekulanu ezers 202 0 25,7692 56,3533 lv0505800 spulgu purvs * 307 0 25,8372 56,3589 lv0505900 kausnu purvs * 230 0 25,9311 56,3508 lv0506000 saltais purvs * 93 0 25,9953 56,3664 lv0506100 tirelu purvs * 1202 0 25,9786 56,2456 lv0506200 slapjo salu purvs * 1057 0 25,7017 56,3661 lv0506300 sverinu purvs * 634 0 25,6128 56,3969 lv0506400 gargrodes purvs * 655 0 25,7222 56,4564 lv0506500 rozu purvs * 991 0 25,6633 56,4683 lv0506600 melnais purvs * 161 0 25,6942 56,3881 lv0507000 certoka ezers (valnezers) * 54 0 27,1203 56,0836 lv0507100 ventas ieleja * 2 506,01 0 21,9506 57,0206 lv0507200 ventas un skervela ieleja * 1459 0 21,9908 56,5767 lv0507300 gaviezes amuli * 105 0 21,3314 56,5153 lv0507400 brienamais purvs * 585 0 21,3383 56,4181 lv0507600 medze * 91 0 21,1308 56,6264 lv0507700 nicas ivju audze * 105 0 21,1953 56,2997 lv0507800 liepajas ezers * 4643 0 21,0544 56,4506 lv0508000 rucavas ivju audze * 200 0 21,1372 56,2339 lv0508100 ziemupe * 2381 0 21,0961 56,8011 lv0508300 dunika * 1745 0 21,3869 56,2606 lv0508400 purgailu purvs * 340 0 24,7878 57,4647 lv0508500 dunezers 170 0 24,7003 57,5364 lv0508600 vidzemes akmenaina jurmala * 1 540,5 0 24,37 57,5436 lv0508700 dzilezers un riebezers * 352 0 24,58 57,4942 lv0509100 randu plavas * 290 0 24,34 57,8294 lv0509500 dzerves purvs * 489 0 24,8711 57,8664 lv0509700 lielpurvs * 1024 0 24,6561 57,8203 lv0509800 niedraju-pilkas purvs * 1030 0 24,6322 57,7431 lv0510000 maizezers * 65 0 24,7661 57,5178 lv0510200 istras ezers * 331 0 27,9711 56,2433 lv0510300 klesniku purvs * 3345 0 28,0047 56,6264 lv0510400 gulbju un platpirovas purvs * 2013 0 28,0669 56,5728 lv0510600 pildas ezers * 610 0 27,7722 56,4717 lv0510700 greblukalns * 246 0 28,1311 56,1903 lv0510800 gulbinkas purvs * 114 0 27,6653 56,5747 lv0510900 zvirgzdenes ezera salas * 4 0 27,6839 56,56 lv0511000 nesaules kalns * 61 0 26,1839 56,9611 lv0511100 barkavas ozolu audze * 60 0 26,6478 56,7083 lv0511300 jumurdas ezers * 353 0 25,7608 56,9464 lv0511600 lielsalas purvs * 197 0 26,5739 56,7169 lv0512100 rusonu ezera salas * 34 0 27,0253 56,1842 lv0512200 lielais pelecares purvs * 5683 0 26,5561 56,4964 lv0512300 asinieku purvs * 1575 0 26,4953 56,2642 lv0512700 gailukalns 2 0 27,5708 56,5617 lv0512800 mezmuizas avoti * 28 0 24,7989 57,1014 lv0513000 liela baltezera salas * 18 0 24,2928 57,0336 lv0513100 babites ezers 2988 0 23,73 56,9172 lv0513400 lielie kangari * 1937 0 24,7428 56,9286 lv0513600 cieceres ezera sala * 15 0 22,5669 56,6517 lv0513700 dulbju acs purvs * 8 0 22,7089 56,79 lv0513800 daiku ivju audze * 15 0 22,4542 57,5686 lv0513900 kadiku nora * 4 0 22,3397 57,6264 lv0514100 kalkupes ieleja * 1120 0 22,4908 57,5619 lv0514200 rakupes ieleja * 2205 0 22,2069 57,4258 lv0514500 zemgalu purvs * 462 0 22,6775 57,4022 lv0514800 plienciema kapa * 62 0 23,2592 57,0889 lv0515100 riesta dzukstenes purvs * 351 0 23,1767 56,7375 lv0515300 karku purvs * 309 0 25,6956 57,8211 lv0515800 bednes purvs * 30 0 26,1997 57,6025 lv0515900 vadainu purvs * 238 0 26,1233 57,5719 lv0516000 oleru purvs * 106 0 25,3747 57,8025 lv0516200 vikvenu purvs 68 0 25,1436 57,5075 lv0517000 klanu purvs * 1606 0 21,7722 57,4622 lv0517100 plucu tirelis * 740 0 22,0778 57,125 lv0517200 sarnates purvs * 1417 0 21,4606 57,1058 lv0517300 naglu un ansinu purvs * 280 0 21,9353 57,1106 lv0517400 tisezers * 39 0 21,8892 57,1386 lv0517500 piesdanga * 6 0 21,7978 57,0867 lv0518300 vecdaugava * 238 0 24,0922 57,0572 lv0518500 lielais un pemmes purvs * 3475 0 24,8111 57,3867 lv0518600 lielais marku purvs * 909 0 26,6939 57,0494 lv0518700 laugas purvs * 740 0 24,7033 57,2783 lv0518900 stiklu purvi * 7245 0 22,2628 57,3278 lv0519000 aklais purvs * 2003 0 25,1236 56,5008 lv0519100 kreicu purvs * 2276 0 27,8808 56,6992 lv0519800 cenas tirelis * 2296 0 23,8483 56,8583 lv0520000 abeli * 3227 0 25,975 56,4111 lv0520200 gudenieki * 106 0 21,5786 56,8844 lv0520300 uzava * 3008 0 21,4075 57,2053 lv0520500 mazie kangari * 348 0 24,7631 57,0353 lv0520900 tosmare * 990 0 21,0569 56,5828 lv0521100 ojatu ezers * 111 0 27,3733 56,0581 lv0521300 dillu plavas * 174 0 21,5953 57,0381 lv0521500 ovisi * 5078 0 21,8664 57,5844 lv0521800 kirbas purvs * 1125 0 21,1581 56,2206 lv0522000 mernieku dumbraji * 61 0 24,4547 57,9111 lv0522100 katlesu mezi * 159 0 27,6286 57,3519 lv0522300 ungurpils mezi * 53 0 24,7964 57,8261 lv0522600 aizkraukles purvi un mezi * 1532 0 25,2453 56,6814 lv0522900 dvietes dumbraji * 121 0 26,3058 56,1439 lv0523000 livberzes liekna * 142 0 23,5103 56,7514 lv0523100 lielupes palienes plavas * 364 0 23,8047 56,6375 lv0523200 ukru garsa * 1116 0 23,1997 56,3767 lv0523300 dzelves krona purvs * 1902 0 24,5144 57,2108 lv0523400 ances purvi un mezi * 10130 0 22,0614 57,5797 lv0524100 mezole * 2845 0 25,9803 57,3217 lv0524500 runupes ieleja * 594 0 21,6883 56,3931 lv0524600 jaunciems * 354 0 24,1878 57,0272 lv0524800 vesetas palienes purvs * 424 0 25,8036 56,6969 lv0524900 pilskalnes siguldina * 66 0 26,2569 55,9817 lv0525000 mangenes mezi * 2201 0 21,9978 57,0808 lv0525100 blazga ezers * 463 0 21,7103 56,5497 lv0525200 linezers * 126 0 24,8553 57,3092 lv0525300 verenes purvi * 1213 0 25,2456 56,7586 lv0525400 gainu purvs * 1112 0 26,2261 56,4586 lv0525500 satinu diki * 3757 0 22,3039 56,6031 lv0525600 zvarde * 3314 0 22,7125 56,5753 lv0525800 zebrus un svetes ezers * 906 0 22,985 56,6292 lv0525900 jaunanna * 1318 0 27,1431 57,2764 lv0526100 gruzdovas mezi * 618 0 27,6333 57,2486 lv0526200 palsu purvs * 622 0 25,6811 56,9742 lv0526400 sventajas upes ieleja * 413 0 21,2336 56,1322 lv0526500 eiduku purvs * 884 0 26,3169 56,5831 lv0526700 pelecu ezera purvs 12 0 26,7172 56,1675 lv0526800 sedas purvs * 7259 0 25,7644 57,7011 lv0527000 melnsalas purvs * 608 0 26,4792 57,5283 lv0527300 tasu ezers * 271 0 21,2214 56,6092 lv0527400 garkalnes mezi * 1785 0 24,4006 57,0589 lv0527500 silabebru ezers 114 0 26,0847 56,6044 lv0527600 vjadas mezi * 208 0 27,5372 57,1789 lv0527700 kadajs * 328 0 26,5728 57,3681 lv0527800 melturu sils * 288 0 25,2067 57,2081 lv0528000 rauza * 812 0 26,0614 57,3906 lv0528100 sepka * 357 0 26,0758 57,3708 lv0528200 launkalne * 172 0 25,9064 57,3469 lv0528300 gipka * 161 0 22,6803 57,5547 lv0528400 gipkas lankas * 111 0 22,5939 57,6022 lv0528500 kaigu purvs * 583 0 23,5772 56,7731 lv0528600 kalnciema plavas * 170 0 23,5703 56,8236 lv0528700 melna ezera purvs * 341 0 23,975 56,8411 lv0528800 mugurves plavas * 317 0 26,8975 57,1086 lv0528900 panemunes mezi * 1023 0 24,4731 56,2994 lv0529100 viskuzu sala * 305 0 22,1619 57,1767 lv0529200 virgulicas mezi * 745 0 27,3708 57,4647 lv0529300 klintaine * 83 0 25,5814 56,5781 lv0529400 draugolis 10 0 25,8669 57,1061 lv0529500 spindulu mezi * 132 0 25,3561 57,0525 lv0529700 raudas mezi * 211 0 26,1697 55,8911 lv0529900 svetes ieleja * 46 0 23,2967 56,3781 lv0530000 skujaines un svetaines ieleja * 130 0 23,2625 56,46 lv0530100 eglone * 159 0 26,1069 56,1894 lv0530200 timsmales ezers * 101 0 26,1819 56,6319 lv0530300 starinas mezs * 157 0 27,5267 55,8264 lv0530400 jecu purvs * 282 0 21,1533 56,2608 lv0530500 vitrupes ieleja * 125 0 24,4453 57,6494 lv0530600 motrines ezers * 46 0 27,6028 56,8681 lv0530700 kapu ezers 17 0 26,5594 56,8086 lv0530800 lielupes grivas plavas * 262 0 23,8906 56,98 lv0530900 jasas-bicanu ezers * 311 0 26,9042 56,2181 lv0531000 nigrandes mezi * 62 0 21,9744 56,3983 lv0531100 baltezera purvs * 228 0 22,6275 56,6811 lv0531200 ruksu purvs * 216 0 22,3464 57,5983 lv0531300 paces plavas * 83 0 22,2336 57,4928 lv0531400 apsuciema zalu purvs * 15 0 23,3181 57,0528 lv0531500 lapinu ezers * 1 0 26,2439 57,5861 lv0531600 taurisu ezers 2 0 26,1858 57,5753 lv0531700 platenes purvs * 455 0 21,7219 57,3914 lv0531800 pelcisu purvs * 56 0 22,1483 57,2478 lv0531900 popes zalu purvs * 78 0 21,8578 57,3739 lv0532000 sitas un pededzes paliene * 870 0 26,9811 57,1417 lv0532200 alsungas mezi * 79 0 21,4336 56,9356 lv0532300 asu purvs * 76 0 26,7408 57,5114 lv0532400 asunes ezeri 70 0 27,6153 56,0186 lv0532600 burgas plavas 183 0 25,9192 57,7556 lv0532700 burtnieku ezera plavas * 432 0 25,2756 57,7203 lv0532800 busnieku ezera krasts * 51 0 21,6297 57,445 lv0532900 dimantu mezs * 183 0 25,7633 56,2681 lv0533000 druvinu tirelis * 293 0 22,1331 57,1203 lv0533100 dubnas paliene * 377 0 26,3811 56,2653 lv0533200 durbes ezera plavas * 596 0 21,3983 56,6275 lv0533300 dures mezs * 43 0 26,5886 57,3833 lv0533400 dzilnas dumbraji * 215 0 25,0283 56,4758 lv0533500 klagatu purvs * 152 0 24,9369 57,51 lv0533600 kalku garsa * 28 0 26,9744 57,3839 lv0533700 kalna purvs * 353 0 24,5811 57,9439 lv0533800 kinkausku mezi * 231 0 26,2303 56,1233 lv0533900 krapas garsa * 206 0 26,7031 57,1725 lv0534000 krojas mezi * 19 0 22,0417 57,1228 lv0534100 liepnas niedraji * 159 0 27,4994 57,4256 lv0534200 zepu mezs * 67 0 27,0147 57,24 lv0534300 lubasts * 110 0 26,4506 55,9522 lv0534400 matkules mezi * 80 0 22,5019 56,9592 lv0534500 melnupes mezi * 66 0 26,5772 57,5253 lv0534600 metru mezs * 77 0 26,4592 57,3378 lv0534900 paltupes mezi * 156 0 25,6497 56,2406 lv0535000 pasulienes mezs * 106 0 26,2361 55,9378 lv0535100 pluncu ezera mezi * 53 0 22,3758 57,1775 lv0535200 posolnica 64 0 27,6786 57,2983 lv0535400 rujas paliene * 444 0 25,235 57,8678 lv0535500 sakas grini * 170 0 21,255 56,8581 lv0535700 sofikalna mezi * 52 0 27,2842 57,3403 lv0535800 tebras ozolu mezi 49 0 21,5675 56,7581 lv0535900 tumes mezi * 68 0 23,0242 57,0083 lv0536000 uzavas augstece * 688 0 21,5275 56,9261 lv0536100 zagadu kalni * 86 0 26,8022 57,4053 lv0536200 zaku riests * 142 0 25,6706 56,3031 lv0536300 zilaiskalns * 118 0 25,2236 57,5536 lv0536400 jasa * 68 0 26,7494 56,1544 lv0536500 pavilostas peleka kapa * 42 0 20,8497 57,0642 lv0536600 lubana mitrajs * 51352 0 26,9431 56,8683 lv0536700 zusu-stainu seravoti 52 0 24,9791 57,0951 lv0600100 vecpiebalga * 8923 0 25,7836 57,0481 lv0600200 veclaicene * 20850 0 26,9372 57,5553 lv0600300 augszeme * 20814 0 26,3433 55,8153 lv0600400 augsdaugava * 52098 0 27,0392 55,86 lv0600500 vestiena * 27117 0 25,9161 56,8803 lv0600700 ziemelgauja * 21749 0 26,1225 57,6764 lv0600800 adazi * 10150 0 24,4364 57,1542 lv0600900 kaucers * 2769 0 26,8639 56,2675 lv0601000 nicgales mezi * 915 0 26,4306 56,1553 lv0804600 dzelmes * 3 0 24,9567 56,6206 lv0824700 visikums * 5 0 27,3006 57,4431 lv0826100 vidagas mezi * 130 0 26,3328 57,3756 lv0826300 gaujienas purvainie mezi * 68 0 26,4339 57,4289 lv0826800 melderupites mezi * 281 0 27,1389 57,5558 lv0830100 ozoldarzs * 19 0 24,0339 56,4461 lv0830200 vecselpils 5 0 25,6114 56,5711 lv0830300 silzemnieki * 2 0 24,7972 57,0736 lv0830400 dublukrogs * 10 0 23,3122 57,0439 lv0830500 priedes * 42 0 26,5344 57,29 lv0830600 berzoles riests * 103 0 26,2558 57,3353 lv0830700 berzu purvs * 58 0 26,5639 57,2361 lv0830800 bulvara riests * 81 0 25,9811 57,7044 lv0830900 gravinas * 7 0 21,8717 56,5147 lv0831000 sepkas riests * 46 0 26,0503 57,3717 lv0831100 kalna riests * 76 0 26,9347 57,0797 lv0831300 banuzu zelta avots * 2 0 25,5781 57,1542 lv0831400 dravenieku avoti * 2 0 24,8272 57,4219 lv0831500 elles purvs * 19 0 24,8933 57,4044 lv0831600 dzirnieku plava 1 0 21,805 56,885 lv0831700 maitiku avoti 2 0 22,6447 56,8458 lv0831800 mezamatveju kadiku plavas 8 0 27,9025 56,3375 lv0831900 mezamatveju plavas * 16 0 27,9044 56,3428 lv0843500 igaunijas riests * 161 0 26,1917 57,7083 lv0900100 nida perkone 36703 0 20,9011 56,2536 lv0900200 akmensrags 25829 0 21,0308 56,7794 lv0900400 rigas lica rietumu piekraste 132172 0 23,1353 57,3592 lv0900500 selga uz rietumiem no tujas 58600 0 24,1578 57,3486 lv0900600 vitrupe tuja 3577 0 24,3544 57,5714 lv0900700 ainazi salacgriva 7114 0 24,285 57,835 se0110002 k ringboda * 1 494,1 0 17,8819 58,8821 se0110003 tullgarn, ost * 1 635,9 0 17,5897 58,9635 se0110005 h ringe-hammersta * 1 155,8 0 18,03 59,032 se0110006 vattgruvsmossen * 73,7 0 17,4518 59,0859 se0110008 stora env ttern * 149,4 0 17,3442 59,116 se0110010 bj rkviksmossen * 14,5 0 17,399 59,1415 se0110015 sandemar * 389,9 0 18,3532 59,1257 se0110017 tyresta- va * 3 269,4 0 18,2969 59,1805 se0110020 korpberget * 44 0 17,62 59,2508 se0110024 saltar -sk rmar * 126,7 0 18,6069 59,322 se0110031 svalgarn * 24,8 0 17,5064 59,5098 se0110038 malmsj n 10,7 0 18,6325 59,5798 se0110041 ngs * 194,9 0 18,7642 59,6241 se0110043 bullersk r * 7,7 0 19,0426 59,6649 se0110051 rimsj skogen * 29,5 0 18,5134 59,7685 se0110078 bergbofj rden-h ver pr st ng * 165,8 0 18,7425 60,1047 se0110080 k ls * 205 0 17,6492 58,9492 se0110082 reveln-kolgusk r * 5,4 0 17,7972 58,8101 se0110085 ut * 4 184,4 0 18,3122 58,9869 se0110086 fj rdl ng * 5089 0 18,5734 59,0188 se0110087 villinge boskaps * 339,7 0 18,6377 59,0941 se0110088 buller -bytta * 14 314,5 0 18,7856 59,1354 se0110092 stora nassa * 2 948,7 0 19,2212 59,4474 se0110096 svenska h garna * 2 667,1 0 19,4961 59,4317 se0110101 fif ng * 176,3 0 17,7098 58,8486 se0110102 grottberget 5,7 0 17,4562 58,9945 se0110103 l ngsj n * 16,3 0 18,5635 59,8712 se0110104 r da 8,4 0 18,8206 59,9013 se0110105 borudamyren * 89,5 0 18,7188 59,9961 se0110106 bj ringe * 32,7 0 18,5142 59,9905 se0110107 borgskogen * 33 0 18,4955 60,0061 se0110108 aspdalssj n * 118,5 0 18,4629 60,0108 se0110109 norra bj rkfj rden, ost * 868 0 17,5177 59,4698 se0110110 brottby all 0,51 0 18,2382 59,5597 se0110111 huvudsk r 2 076,5 0 18,5611 58,9679 se0110112 v sby hage * 117,4 0 17,5315 59,4052 se0110113 riddersholm * 614,5 0 19,0359 59,7111 se0110114 bornsj n * 697,1 0 17,7434 59,2407 se0110115 brosj n * 142,4 0 17,7886 59,1802 se0110118 r n ngsholme * 54,5 0 18,1833 58,9439 se0110119 stegsholm * 108,9 0 18,2504 59,1084 se0110120 ormberget * 7,2 0 18,582 59,9333 se0110122 karlsdalsmossen * 81,3 0 18,5782 59,8726 se0110123 norra malma 8,1 0 18,6524 59,8342 se0110124 svenska bj rn 3 980,2 0 19,6023 59,6166 se0110126 kalkberget * 14,5 0 17,6986 59,0014 se0110127 oaxen * 21,1 0 17,7132 58,9775 se0110128 sj g rd 8,8 0 17,3579 59,0223 se0110130 broviken 311,1 0 17,6525 59,4836 se0110131 sj kullarna * 4 0 18,2072 59,5804 se0110132 dammstak rret * 25,4 0 18,2634 59,4124 se0110133 treh rningsskogen * 179 0 18,3666 59,5332 se0110135 morak rren * 9,3 0 17,7746 59,0662 se0110137 svartsj n * 5 0 18,6167 60,1236 se0110138 gorran * 10,1 0 18,4353 59,659 se0110139 kornamossen * 49,5 0 18,2611 59,8222 se0110140 norrpada 32,2 0 19,2755 59,6548 se0110141 furusundsfj rden * 372,8 0 18,9406 59,6917 se0110142 b rsj n * 47,9 0 17,5068 59,229 se0110145 bellberget * 27,6 0 18,5032 59,8394 se0110146 slessberget * 32 0 17,6537 58,9656 se0110147 tullviksb cken * 197,1 0 18,8317 60,0644 se0110149 hamnudden 5,3 0 18,9384 59,8816 se0110150 hov 6,3 0 18,7271 59,8108 se0110151 l nnaskogen * 94,2 0 18,1059 59,2002 se0110152 r sarings sen 82,1 0 17,5462 59,5131 se0110153 hebbok rret * 4,6 0 17,5252 59,5141 se0110154 adels -s ttra * 24,7 0 17,4574 59,4045 se0110155 ytter ng * 69,3 0 18,1423 58,9847 se0110156 k rs 35,4 0 17,6496 59,3321 se0110158 j rflotta * 179,4 0 17,9253 58,8185 se0110159 sl tmossen * 84,3 0 17,9131 59,0556 se0110161 stora alsj n * 195,2 0 17,4136 59,093 se0110163 brinkb cken 15,3 0 17,8236 59,1 se0110164 lina 155,1 0 17,5804 59,2261 se0110165 ekholmen 17,8 0 17,8066 59,2269 se0110166 dyvik 4,8 0 18,3967 59,1987 se0110167 kvarnsj n * 98,7 0 18,0843 59,194 se0110168 l ngvikstr sk * 70,4 0 18,4915 59,2344 se0110169 s derbysj n-dammtorpssj n * 63,2 0 18,1491 59,2851 se0110170 ekoberget 3 0 18,3183 59,3276 se0110171 skeviks grotta 0,15 0 18,3789 59,343 se0110172 judarskogen 92,9 0 17,9142 59,3377 se0110173 kyrksj l ten 30,3 0 17,9169 59,3489 se0110174 g seborg * 14,5 0 17,7661 59,3992 se0110176 broknapparna * 91,4 0 17,6751 59,4458 se0110178 vickelsj n * 33,7 0 18,4847 60,0152 se0110179 grundsj n * 96,6 0 18,4665 60,0501 se0110180 arn * 0,68 0 18,6437 60,1086 se0110181 sturehov * 7 0 17,7713 59,2568 se0110182 adels pr stg rd 2,5 0 17,4947 59,3631 se0110186 lov k rs * 14,1 0 17,8987 59,3226 se0110187 vassviken, kaggeholm 2 0 17,6884 59,2823 se0110188 edeby ekhage 7,1 0 17,8597 59,3022 se0110191 svartsj djurg rd 4,8 0 17,7247 59,348 se0110192 ekdalen * 13,2 0 17,6587 59,3539 se0110193 tofta 2,9 0 17,4663 59,3894 se0110194 lgg rden * 2,6 0 17,723 59,4067 se0110195 kronhagen 6,6 0 17,6852 59,4126 se0110197 hanveden * 245,7 0 18,0309 59,1437 se0110198 riddartorpsmossen * 25,1 0 18,0684 59,1359 se0110199 varn fladen * 257,9 0 18,3992 59,0083 se0110201 s dra n ttar * 56,3 0 18,1073 58,8678 se0110202 ster lad ngen * 10,6 0 18,445 59,0837 se0110203 l * 55,4 0 18,1955 58,9154 se0110204 orrs ttra * 3,4 0 17,4772 59,1078 se0110205 fullersta kvarn * 3,8 0 17,9427 59,2566 se0110206 granby * 9,8 0 18,0594 59,1686 se0110208 velamsund * 14 0 18,3197 59,3463 se0110210 klubben 4,1 0 18,923 59,8583 se0110211 arsl jan * 26,8 0 19,0431 59,8958 se0110212 balet * 19,3 0 18,7438 59,9789 se0110213 stormossen * 31,6 0 18,3966 59,6384 se0110216 boda * 1,6 0 18,5287 60,135 se0110217 bj rnviken-m rtviken * 24,7 0 18,7397 59,9899 se0110219 borudan-pellemossen * 128 0 18,6858 60,0049 se0110220 br nselmossen-ljusmossen-bredmossen * 50,5 0 18,5345 59,6745 se0110221 buddbol * 5,2 0 18,5753 59,9362 se0110223 edsbro kyrksj 39,8 0 18,5227 59,8965 se0110224 ersmossen * 25,7 0 18,6356 60,0449 se0110225 fiskarudden * 4,4 0 18,6325 60,1435 se0110227 sk llarholmsviken * 9,4 0 18,9766 59,7429 se0110228 stormaren-lilltr sket, gissling * 45,3 0 19,1781 59,7788 se0110229 grevinnans r * 22,4 0 18,6334 59,6594 se0110230 grytk rren * 73 0 18,3971 59,9334 se0110231 hasselhorn * 39,7 0 18,6114 59,8569 se0110232 havsskogen 0,85 0 18,8185 60,0384 se0110233 hummelberget * 66,2 0 18,4982 59,8027 se0110234 hummelsvedjan 7,1 0 18,4357 60,038 se0110235 h ver -norrby * 1,9 0 18,7369 60,0959 se0110238 kvicksalshagen-igelsj n 7,4 0 18,4943 59,9325 se0110239 igelsta * 19,7 0 18,6886 59,9031 se0110240 nothamn * 1,2 0 18,8501 60,028 se0110241 kalvsk ret 0,24 0 18,8079 60,1757 se0110242 karlberg 0,47 0 18,244 59,8182 se0110243 v gsj n * 40,7 0 18,639 59,8694 se0110244 kassj n * 6 0 18,7941 59,9322 se0110245 kolarmora skogen * 31,3 0 18,4066 60,0354 se0110246 kristineholm 20,6 0 18,4751 59,8534 se0110247 kr kh ttan 0,5 0 18,8642 59,9024 se0110248 lerk rret * 6,2 0 18,4836 59,827 se0110249 lid * 245,3 0 19,0839 59,7797 se0110251 maran 0,86 0 18,8957 59,964 se0110252 mj lnark rrskogen * 15,4 0 18,4133 59,9516 se0110253 m rdsj n 7,2 0 18,5176 59,8115 se0110254 m rtsj skogen * 29 0 18,3948 59,6042 se0110255 nor * 1,8 0 18,8727 59,9543 se0110256 nordv st r rmyren * 2,6 0 18,6377 59,6798 se0110258 kallvik 10 0 18,6382 59,8375 se0110259 svarvarmosskogen * 21,3 0 18,4484 59,9516 se0110260 samn sfj rden * 385,8 0 18,9298 59,9277 se0110261 norrmarjum-mossen * 12,5 0 18,6601 59,8846 se0110262 svartk rret * 8,4 0 18,509 59,8631 se0110263 norsviken 3,5 0 18,8636 59,8801 se0110264 l taholmen * 20,8 0 18,9581 59,7464 se0110266 rotholma * 6,5 0 18,7065 60,1135 se0110268 r rvik * 24,4 0 18,896 59,9123 se0110269 s dra r da * 43 0 18,8284 59,9026 se0110270 sj ngen 7,6 0 18,8062 59,9859 se0110274 smedsmoraskogen * 106,8 0 18,3224 59,712 se0110275 lugnet * 2,1 0 18,714 59,9254 se0110277 storanden * 85,4 0 18,1853 59,758 se0110278 storlaven * 6,2 0 18,7097 59,694 se0110280 storvikaren * 20,2 0 18,6689 60,0633 se0110281 stor ngen * 5,2 0 18,831 59,9745 se0110283 str jan * 23,6 0 18,6764 59,9228 se0110284 s derfladen * 45,7 0 18,8708 59,6642 se0110287 s dersj n 1,7 0 18,5442 59,8019 se0110290 vagn * 13,3 0 18,5379 59,9043 se0110292 syd v sby * 3,5 0 18,7188 59,8482 se0110293 v sby ngsbacke 4,5 0 18,6556 59,6782 se0110294 v ster ngen * 52 0 18,8369 59,9477 se0110295 landet * 23,7 0 18,989 59,6909 se0110296 backen * 5,9 0 18,1513 59,6874 se0110298 morn san * 20,7 0 18,7886 59,86 se0110299 katthavet * 7,9 0 18,775 60,1288 se0110303 borgberget * 38,4 0 17,9387 59,0617 se0110305 eng rden * 111,5 0 17,9517 59,0894 se0110306 koholmen * 16,4 0 17,7461 58,9677 se0110308 bergaholms ekhage 3,1 0 17,7066 59,2332 se0110309 v llinge lund * 5,4 0 17,7064 59,2602 se0110312 pekhagen * 16,7 0 18,0336 59,697 se0110313 sl sta * 14 0 17,8788 59,6571 se0110315 v ster ngsudd * 16,6 0 17,7899 59,5929 se0110317 hansta 14,4 0 17,8981 59,4272 se0110318 botten * 16,4 0 17,6528 58,9772 se0110320 hamnsk r * 9 0 17,4035 59,3179 se0110321 h rningsholm * 9,5 0 17,6659 59,0464 se0110322 jurstaholm 7,5 0 17,4335 59,3041 se0110323 kiholm * 5,4 0 17,594 59,2386 se0110324 kvedesta 4,4 0 17,6179 59,146 se0110325 ledar n * 230,5 0 17,6427 59,0346 se0110327 nora holm ng * 25,8 0 17,6376 58,9941 se0110329 skanssundet * 14,6 0 17,6823 59,0504 se0110330 skillebyholm * 4,9 0 17,6143 59,0411 se0110331 st ngberget * 3,6 0 17,6788 59,1295 se0110332 talbystrand * 6,3 0 17,6089 59,2322 se0110333 brant syd lanaren * 4,8 0 17,6098 59,14 se0110334 skogstorp * 49 0 17,3577 59,0597 se0110337 k rringsj n-m rtsj n * 45,8 0 18,0092 59,456 se0110338 pr stg rden-skogberga * 24,6 0 18,0723 59,4853 se0110339 vallensj * 16,2 0 17,9935 59,5198 se0110340 tors kers almlund * 12,5 0 17,9357 59,5579 se0110341 hammaren nyborg 4,9 0 17,5401 59,6225 se0110345 tarby- ttesta * 10,1 0 18,1299 59,6602 se0110346 t rnholm * 20,2 0 18,3473 59,5622 se0110347 v sterholmen 8,1 0 18,6008 59,3892 se0110348 sn ve * 19,1 0 18,8759 59,4178 se0110349 norra n md * 102,2 0 18,6991 59,2061 se0110351 stor ngsudd 10,6 0 18,348 59,2966 se0110355 stor n-l ngholmen-kalvholmen * 40 0 18,415 59,4329 se0110359 losj n 8,1 0 18,5555 59,5707 se0110360 stavs ng * 9,5 0 18,622 59,5627 se0110361 deglinge * 16,1 0 18,1553 59,4776 se0110362 bl tviken * 4,9 0 18,5175 59,5773 se0110363 rydboholms ekhage * 11,6 0 18,2052 59,4416 se0110365 s dergarn * 24,7 0 18,543 59,8475 se0110366 n * 9,5 0 18,5777 59,8311 se0110367 ubby ekhage 2,4 0 18,2436 59,4425 se0110369 bromseby * 18,5 0 18,3426 59,5653 se0110370 br nnmossen * 6,1 0 18,3724 59,6513 se0110372 stor ngstorpet * 5,5 0 18,691 59,945 se0110373 r llingfladen * 7,3 0 18,9928 59,7457 se0110375 tranmyran 12,3 0 18,4174 59,9222 se0110376 blommensk rren * 20,1 0 18,4354 59,9237 se0110377 askn sviken * 19,8 0 17,7618 59,2726 se0110378 mossbottnarna 4,6 0 18,5213 59,9643 se0110379 bl kulla 0,72 0 18,4792 60,022 se0110380 kl v ngen 2,2 0 18,4329 60,0247 se0110381 dansbol 0,57 0 18,4405 60,0338 se0110382 gr sholmen * 6,4 0 17,5559 59,4418 se0110383 lundhagsbadet * 0,22 0 17,8043 59,2683 se0110385 arholma-id * 248,5 0 19,13 59,8041 se0210008 b tfors * 1 572,9 0 17,3439 60,4548 se0210019 h lln skusten * 1 449,3 0 18,0163 60,584 se0210023 florarna * 5 138,3 0 17,8324 60,2918 se0210037 fiby urskog * 87,4 0 17,3505 59,8894 se0210045 hov n-aln n * 385,4 0 18,5596 60,277 se0210049 edsk rret 1,6 0 18,3277 60,2775 se0210052 fager n * 506,9 0 18,4529 60,2026 se0210058 valkr r * 29 0 18,428 60,0569 se0210062 aspbladsmossen * 31,3 0 18,357 59,8837 se0210077 hj lstaviken * 807,8 0 17,3808 59,6682 se0210078 hemsta * 24,5 0 17,1443 59,5979 se0210081 r llingen * 164,8 0 17,3546 59,448 se0210083 veckholms pr stholme * 29,6 0 17,3996 59,4047 se0210155 pansarudden * 297,6 0 18,3516 59,9859 se0210156 skr ddarmossen * 55,1 0 18,33 60,1241 se0210157 kroppsj n * 29,6 0 18,3054 60,0329 se0210158 m ssmyrfallet * 113,3 0 18,3011 60,1195 se0210159 ekb cken-j mnbromossen * 32,3 0 18,3256 60,0911 se0210160 bj rnsundet-stork rren * 63,9 0 18,3583 60,0167 se0210161 ekdalen * 20,3 0 18,3531 59,9714 se0210162 dammen-edsj n * 118,3 0 18,3763 59,9638 se0210163 h sthagen-kilholmen * 36,5 0 18,355 59,9543 se0210164 ryttarhagen * 1,4 0 18,3729 59,8888 se0210165 hjulsta s teri * 23,4 0 17,0137 59,5352 se0210205 olas skifte * 305,4 0 18,307 60,0229 se0210212 billudden * 1 896,9 0 17,532 60,6689 se0210213 s tra * 31,6 0 17,5427 60,4837 se0210214 stigsbo r dmosse * 43,1 0 17,232 60,0123 se0210215 v nsj sen * 14 0 17,0896 59,7428 se0210217 kalmarn s * 89,1 0 17,4492 59,5511 se0210218 sandviks sen * 63,7 0 17,5208 59,6717 se0210219 norra bj rkfj rden v stra * 220,2 0 17,4865 59,4665 se0210220 kallriga * 1 149,3 0 18,263 60,3737 se0210221 landholmarna, landholms ngarna * 33,2 0 17,522 59,7185 se0210222 ngsk r, bondsk ret * 387,7 0 18,0652 60,4916 se0210223 andersby ngsbackar * 204,4 0 17,8215 60,1572 se0210224 g sholmen * 24,7 0 17,45 60,1135 se0210226 rickebasta alsumpskog * 8,2 0 17,725 59,7351 se0210227 skaten-r ngsen * 2 232,2 0 18,1361 60,452 se0210228 rsk r * 474,6 0 18,4014 60,5217 se0210229 ryggmossen * 77,4 0 17,3265 60,0443 se0210230 ekilla sen * 28 0 17,5116 59,6055 se0210231 kapplasse * 38,9 0 17,8341 60,5804 se0210232 gropholmarna 16,3 0 17,4328 60,5373 se0210233 bruksdammen * 597 0 18,09 60,3852 se0210234 arn huvud * 82,3 0 17,5529 59,7273 se0210235 uvberget * 3,6 0 17,2789 59,745 se0210236 tedar n * 90,1 0 16,9717 59,5266 se0210237 fuller backar * 22,8 0 17,6389 59,9357 se0210238 styggk rret * 373,7 0 17,2984 59,9658 se0210239 f bodmossen * 104,2 0 17,3217 59,9444 se0210240 bredfors * 347 0 17,2208 60,4183 se0210242 viksta stentorg 6 0 17,515 60,1253 se0210243 uppsala kungs ng 12,5 0 17,6622 59,8366 se0210244 hargs tallpark 5,7 0 18,3881 60,1896 se0210247 h gsta sen 19 0 17,583 59,9764 se0210248 grillsk ret * 25,1 0 18,4568 60,4839 se0210249 h gb dan * 20,6 0 18,4639 60,479 se0210250 gr s g rd * 49,1 0 18,499 60,3397 se0210251 eriksdal-l nnholmen * 66,1 0 18,5416 60,33 se0210252 gr ns * 66,4 0 17,3005 59,4541 se0210253 fagerudds sen * 26,6 0 17,0754 59,5802 se0210255 sandhagen * 23,3 0 17,6118 59,7291 se0210256 id n * 178,9 0 18,5801 60,3071 se0210257 r vsten * 61,3 0 18,6064 60,3124 se0210258 bokaren * 17,8 0 17,9229 59,966 se0210259 rby * 34,5 0 17,8056 59,9429 se0210260 knutby * 125,5 0 18,2859 59,9057 se0210262 ekeby- nge 21,1 0 17,7206 59,9973 se0210263 kavar * 29,8 0 18,4111 60,3128 se0210264 sunds ng * 23,2 0 18,5475 60,3261 se0210265 l ngalma 32,5 0 18,4635 60,2645 se0210266 biskops-arn * 140,6 0 17,4923 59,6649 se0210267 kapellbacken 2,7 0 17,8269 60,4323 se0210270 slada * 871,7 0 17,9971 60,5248 se0210271 str nningsvik * 29 0 18,0198 60,476 se0210272 fr kensj n * 5,1 0 17,8817 60,5708 se0210273 lerorna 2,6 0 17,9802 60,5001 se0210274 grundsj n * 32 0 18,4524 60,0808 se0210275 b lsj n * 19,8 0 17,4953 60,5894 se0210276 mararna * 41,2 0 17,6119 60,6151 se0210277 marma * 1 976,5 0 17,4629 60,5152 se0210278 t mnaren st * 1 837,5 0 17,3607 60,1587 se0210280 bj rns sk rg rd * 1 120,7 0 17,9539 60,6243 se0210281 t ngs murarna * 79 0 17,338 60,4986 se0210282 g rdsk rskusten * 444,7 0 17,6386 60,6291 se0210283 k rr norr om sj dyn * 10,2 0 17,706 59,9269 se0210284 storskogen * 139,1 0 17,7277 59,9404 se0210285 ledsk r * 370,7 0 17,7061 60,5092 se0210286 l ngsands rarna * 279,1 0 17,549 60,6545 se0210287 degermossen * 447,1 0 17,2891 59,7939 se0210290 bryggholmen * 83 0 17,1455 59,5288 se0210291 b ckl sa * 44,3 0 17,6414 59,809 se0210292 saxmarken * 286,1 0 17,9444 60,4175 se0210293 tj derleksmossen * 330,3 0 18,0106 59,8994 se0210294 ersta * 41,9 0 17,4869 60,3986 se0210295 djupfj rd * 114 0 17,9684 60,5501 se0210296 bolstan * 50,4 0 17,6397 60,4391 se0210297 morga * 2,7 0 17,6372 59,7483 se0210298 harparbol lund * 2,6 0 18,0017 59,8751 se0210299 ramsens v stra strand * 2,5 0 17,9127 59,8256 se0210300 haga ekbackar * 46,7 0 17,0201 59,5957 se0210302 fl t 2,7 0 17,3616 60,6012 se0210304 nybylund 11,6 0 17,4725 59,6767 se0210305 komoss ngen 2,1 0 17,4988 60,6091 se0210306 komossen * 55,7 0 17,4989 60,6185 se0210307 dumdal-hj lsta 12,6 0 17,3783 59,697 se0210308 tjuvk llan 2,4 0 17,4694 60,3473 se0210309 oxk llan 0,21 0 17,4564 59,7457 se0210310 wik * 37,6 0 17,4731 59,7384 se0210311 v stan n 3,2 0 17,4225 60,5809 se0210312 stan n 17,3 0 17,5023 60,5431 se0210313 ster-m rtar * 25,2 0 18,4643 60,4176 se0210314 g ksn re * 24,8 0 18,0005 60,4672 se0210315 l ngmossen * 27,6 0 17,7938 60,5539 se0210316 romsmaren * 7,7 0 17,947 60,598 se0210320 kvarn n * 20,1 0 17,3175 60,4441 se0210321 sund * 11,6 0 18,3361 60,3228 se0210322 storsk ret * 26,1 0 18,241 60,371 se0210323 m sj n * 2,6 0 18,3132 60,1132 se0210324 sj hagen * 39,3 0 18,4458 60,1822 se0210325 verkarna * 4,4 0 18,4488 60,2955 se0210326 raggar n * 56,6 0 18,6177 60,2034 se0210327 sn bottenk rret * 13,1 0 18,3407 60,09 se0210328 faringe * 48,2 0 18,1651 59,9832 se0210329 lunsen * 1 348,2 0 17,7115 59,7849 se0210330 stra n sten * 119,9 0 17,5923 59,8179 se0210340 siggefora ledningsgata s dra 58,9 0 17,167 59,9672 se0210341 stora och lilla ullfj rden * 216,8 0 17,5192 59,6036 se0210342 fiskmansbo * 15,5 0 17,1951 59,7507 se0210343 f n * 28,7 0 17,3842 59,5675 se0210344 lena-husby * 5,5 0 17,7027 59,9737 se0210345 s vja n-funbosj n 263,1 0 17,8515 59,866 se0210346 h rsb cksdalen * 22,1 0 16,9131 59,8695 se0210347 myrkarby * 45,1 0 16,9389 59,8817 se0210348 tr nviksmossen * 157,1 0 17,0231 59,9517 se0210349 dalkarls sen 51,3 0 16,8559 59,9682 se0210350 huddunge stormosse * 96,1 0 16,9537 60,0175 se0210351 sillbo * 6 0 16,9297 60,0545 se0210352 svartk rret * 17,9 0 17,0741 60,0584 se0210353 ruthagsskogen * 97,7 0 17,1004 60,0246 se0210354 siggefora ledningsgata, norr 100,6 0 17,1356 60,059 se0210355 svinasj n * 249,3 0 17,1802 60,0451 se0210356 harbo-svina * 2,9 0 17,1928 60,0766 se0210357 marstalla * 171,2 0 17,2903 60,0671 se0210358 vida * 59,7 0 17,3001 60,093 se0210359 lindsta * 25 0 17,299 60,1096 se0210360 kalvn set * 18,4 0 17,3151 60,1309 se0210361 t mnaren v st * 2 193,8 0 17,3077 60,1573 se0210362 falsh let 1,1 0 17,3007 60,2139 se0210363 l ngh llsmossen * 172,3 0 17,2444 60,2439 se0210364 r vkilarna * 45,7 0 17,1669 60,2544 se0210365 spenbo * 6,8 0 17,1499 60,2479 se0210367 pellesberget * 930,5 0 16,9669 60,2774 se0210368 f rnebofj rden syd * 5 236,5 0 16,7646 60,1614 se0210369 sta * 958,2 0 16,818 60,1655 se0210370 ingbok llorna * 6,8 0 16,8358 60,1475 se0210371 torbacks sen 39,5 0 16,954 60,2215 se0210372 nora-holm * 4,6 0 17,0127 60,1435 se0210373 villingeskogen * 29,5 0 16,7409 60,0793 se0220009 stora b tet * 421,8 0 16,7807 58,6795 se0220011 b rstak rret * 5,1 0 16,7389 58,7912 se0220012 n vsj skogen * 5 0 16,7288 58,6573 se0220013 ngbacken 3,7 0 16,8043 58,9176 se0220017 svanviken-lindbacke * 122 0 16,9816 58,7402 se0220020 strandstuviken * 989,6 0 17,0993 58,7059 se0220021 sj sak rren * 23,2 0 17,123 58,7424 se0220028 h vringe-k llsk ren 11 104,5 0 17,2577 58,5625 se0220034 tullgarn s dra * 2 014,2 0 17,543 58,9575 se0220059 grindstugan 0,91 0 16,3817 59,2737 se0220063 sparreholms ekhagar * 88 0 16,8334 59,0881 se0220069 putbergen * 14,5 0 16,9324 59,1851 se0220072 stampmossen * 12,2 0 16,9486 59,2266 se0220077 rid -sundbyholmsarkipelagen s dra * 2 939,5 0 16,6469 59,4741 se0220078 sofiebergs sen * 8,7 0 16,6561 59,4088 se0220083 nybbleholme * 42,9 0 17,1852 59,4629 se0220085 gripsholms hjorthage * 48,6 0 17,2044 59,2532 se0220087 s derfj rden * 209,2 0 16,8128 59,4019 se0220088 herr knan s * 33,8 0 16,951 59,1172 se0220089 tuna * 3,4 0 16,9424 59,0693 se0220103 pilg ljan 8,8 0 16,4003 58,8174 se0220104 s gartorpsk rret * 6,1 0 16,3594 58,7721 se0220106 fj llmossen norra * 304,1 0 16,5153 58,7042 se0220110 sk raviken * 316 0 16,7324 58,8179 se0220115 marsviken-mars ng * 121,8 0 16,961 58,6767 se0220118 labro ngar * 81,6 0 17,0849 58,7583 se0220119 linudden * 11 0 17,0867 58,7334 se0220122 v stra djupvik * 16,5 0 17,1117 58,7531 se0220124 horsvik * 14,1 0 17,3908 58,7607 se0220126 nyn s * 1 826,3 0 17,383 58,8185 se0220129 sk rg rdsreservaten * 8 811,1 0 17,5043 58,7078 se0220130 lots ngsbacken * 14,2 0 17,5488 58,8722 se0220137 br tamossen * 27,9 0 16,1141 58,8975 se0220145 b ven arna * 774,6 0 17,0068 59,0218 se0220148 davik * 63,5 0 17,1115 58,9236 se0220150 t ken n * 1 002,6 0 15,8119 59,1872 se0220151 igelb len * 17,6 0 15,9339 59,0795 se0220152 barrsj mossen 37,8 0 16,2426 59,0709 se0220154 knaby * 4,7 0 16,3331 59,1099 se0220156 lilla tj rbruket * 2,8 0 16,1186 59,3329 se0220160 br nntorp * 9,2 0 16,3267 59,1369 se0220166 br t n * 36,8 0 16,8473 59,2437 se0220168 mora hage * 3,5 0 16,906 59,1876 se0220174 marvikarna * 213 0 17,1626 59,19 se0220175 s dra k rrl ngen * 101,4 0 17,148 59,289 se0220176 tovhulta stormosse * 60,1 0 16,0544 59,3365 se0220182 segers n * 770,6 0 16,9309 59,4676 se0220191 himlinge sen * 26,6 0 16,3725 59,0766 se0220193 jaktstuguskogen * 52,7 0 16,8196 59,0498 se0220194 henaredalen * 13,5 0 16,7956 59,1253 se0220197 kalkbro * 2,6 0 17,0114 59,2224 se0220199 gorsingeholm 14 0 17,0583 59,3555 se0220201 evighetsbacken * 18,1 0 16,2422 58,8943 se0220202 djupviksn s * 3,2 0 16,3392 58,8252 se0220203 l nestaheden * 6,5 0 17,4909 58,9518 se0220204 h lvetten-n snaren 1 000,9 0 16,3256 58,8398 se0220205 stora munkebo * 10,8 0 16,4252 58,8544 se0220206 floden * 56,1 0 16,3121 59,0887 se0220207 torpskogen * 20,3 0 16,5588 59,0745 se0220208 lomsj skogen * 31,4 0 16,9543 59,1712 se0220210 lenellstorpsk rret * 16,2 0 17,0456 59,2267 se0220211 ekorneberg * 9,8 0 16,717 59,3578 se0220212 stortr n 108,8 0 17,2514 58,9626 se0220213 fr kenk rret * 140,9 0 17,1953 58,9268 se0220214 utn set * 79,8 0 17,1975 58,9903 se0220215 bok -oxn * 327,9 0 17,6201 58,8474 se0220216 rosenlund * 2,9 0 16,3999 58,8129 se0220217 tore grav 10,2 0 17,1662 58,941 se0220218 stend rren * 901,8 0 17,3824 58,7369 se0220219 skedevi * 31,1 0 16,6988 59,0491 se0220220 nyckelmossen * 65,8 0 17,1447 58,7621 se0220223 svartsj myren * 15,9 0 16,8961 59,2234 se0220224 n sberget * 5,9 0 17,1866 59,065 se0220226 fiholm * 26,4 0 16,7419 59,4387 se0220227 stav sen 3,1 0 16,5597 59,0344 se0220228 nhammarsn set * 54,7 0 16,9115 59,1401 se0220229 koholmen * 20,6 0 17,2974 58,8127 se0220231 r g * 1 559,6 0 17,3382 58,7171 se0220232 holmtorp * 7,3 0 16,6568 59,0823 se0220233 stora sa * 7,6 0 17,0334 59,1594 se0220234 pers * 9,9 0 17,6035 58,791 se0220235 kalkugnstorp * 19,7 0 15,9672 59,153 se0220236 lerb le * 7,3 0 16,7465 59,3586 se0220237 mel n * 11,4 0 16,4035 58,9215 se0220238 bj rnvad * 15,7 0 16,8527 59,3399 se0220239 veckla ng 1,2 0 16,5442 58,988 se0220240 k rtorp * 12,4 0 16,313 58,9453 se0220241 lisstorp 0,64 0 16,3472 58,8868 se0220243 ekn set * 31,7 0 16,2502 58,9058 se0220245 stenstorps hagk rr * 34,3 0 16,3404 58,8193 se0220247 hedens * 15 0 16,3115 59,2257 se0220248 sund ngen 11,3 0 15,9699 59,0491 se0220250 norrby kyrkskog * 11 0 17,0721 59,398 se0220251 djupvikssj skogen * 11,4 0 17,244 59,1516 se0220252 igelsj skogen * 18,3 0 16,9586 59,1517 se0220253 tussm tet * 61 0 17,2636 59,1638 se0220255 f gelboskogen * 13,6 0 17,2923 58,937 se0220257 tomtaklintskogen * 28 0 17,5663 58,9119 se0220301 bors 12,9 0 17,6177 58,8864 se0220303 b ven 6 199,6 0 16,8787 59,0207 se0220304 kila n-vreta n * 137,8 0 16,612 58,7413 se0220305 floda-kyrksj n 136,8 0 16,3612 59,0769 se0220306 n snaren 678,6 0 16,1653 59,0176 se0220309 brebol * 42,6 0 16,472 58,9559 se0220310 v stra kolberga * 8,5 0 16,2553 58,9507 se0220311 fr kenvassen * 20,9 0 17,1825 58,9907 se0220312 skyle * 5,7 0 17,3052 58,8314 se0220314 h llvik * 16,4 0 16,1449 59,048 se0220315 vreten * 4,1 0 17,2112 58,9165 se0220317 kila * 2 0 16,1518 59,2051 se0220318 skogstorpshagen * 8,7 0 16,0915 59,2272 se0220320 tyn s ekhagar 5,6 0 17,0634 59,3767 se0220322 harpsund- n * 14,2 0 16,4808 59,0933 se0220327 kok rret * 22,1 0 16,2647 59,1424 se0220328 k llarhalsen 1,5 0 16,2527 59,1624 se0220329 marsj n * 53,9 0 16,6849 58,9555 se0220330 torsmossen * 26,2 0 15,8182 59,0231 se0220331 des ngssj n * 17,4 0 15,8856 59,1024 se0220332 rmossen * 85,5 0 16,1102 59,205 se0220333 nya k rren * 2,3 0 15,9239 59,0855 se0220334 himlingeskogen * 44,1 0 16,3963 59,0982 se0220335 utnorsskogen * 16,8 0 16,9969 59,0076 se0220336 harpeboln set 10,1 0 16,2873 58,856 se0220337 storhultet * 28 0 17,0452 58,8371 se0220338 dag holmsbackarna 4,2 0 16,4549 58,9857 se0220339 mis tters ekhagar * 9,7 0 16,988 59,1191 se0220340 lidak rret * 1,9 0 16,7218 58,8292 se0220341 svinn set * 58,3 0 16,0997 58,9536 se0220343 askholmen * 94,5 0 16,393 59,4498 se0220344 l v n * 48,8 0 16,2962 59,2764 se0220345 stenhammars kohage * 21 0 16,5409 59,0483 se0220346 hyltingeravinen * 7,8 0 16,815 59,0899 se0220347 nyk rr * 11,2 0 16,8506 59,2533 se0220348 tynnels djurg rd * 22,5 0 17,1046 59,4038 se0220349 djupdalshagen 8,5 0 16,9212 59,142 se0220350 ljuvalund * 26,2 0 16,9748 59,0084 se0220351 djurg rden * 8,4 0 16,9929 58,9935 se0220352 vurstusbacken 6,4 0 16,9472 58,9851 se0220353 lervik * 9,4 0 17,3093 58,8048 se0220354 s byviken-b darn * 15,9 0 17,0166 59,4832 se0220356 masugnsskogen * 14,9 0 17,1568 58,8433 se0220357 likstammen * 930,3 0 17,2058 58,9623 se0220358 skolm starhagen * 2 0 16,9455 59,3715 se0220360 hornskogen 8,2 0 16,7428 59,0424 se0220362 l garb cken * 2,2 0 16,2442 58,9015 se0220363 lind n * 257,2 0 16,8392 59,3948 se0220364 v sby 13,6 0 15,9949 59,1617 se0220367 toms ngen * 27,7 0 15,7103 59,0341 se0220368 skiren-kvicken * 128,3 0 16,3883 59,3554 se0220369 magsj torp * 54,4 0 16,9493 59,2172 se0220370 tynnels -pr stholmen * 27,6 0 17,0768 59,4223 se0220372 nga * 1,7 0 17,189 58,7351 se0220373 boravinen * 15,9 0 16,3671 58,775 se0220401 berga-lista * 16,4 0 16,252 59,3133 se0220402 karlslundsskogen 24,4 0 16,8049 59,3222 se0220403 r by-myrhem * 5 0 16,0559 59,3063 se0220405 torparskogen * 15,5 0 16,8069 59,3114 se0220408 haga hage * 22,8 0 16,935 59,1463 se0220411 h llesta * 20 0 17,0455 59,1083 se0220413 nytorpsravinen * 10,1 0 16,9266 59,1207 se0220414 stora brandsbol * 7,1 0 17,2183 58,9707 se0220417 r s tter-viks tter * 31,5 0 16,0819 59,0921 se0220420 simonsbol * 16,5 0 16,3057 58,8669 se0220421 tornskogen * 25,4 0 16,1867 59,0048 se0220425 valdemars n * 16,5 0 16,4486 59,0643 se0220427 berga kulle * 32,2 0 16,8131 58,7316 se0220429 timmermon * 24,7 0 17,2335 58,932 se0220431 fem rehuvud * 21,5 0 17,1065 58,6495 se0220432 fur n * 19,9 0 17,1364 58,6556 se0220433 hassel -berg * 17,8 0 17,18 58,6603 se0220434 bredsj n s 4,9 0 17,0717 59,2082 se0220435 gesta * 28,5 0 17,1737 59,3391 se0220438 sa gravf lt * 6,2 0 17,1892 59,3899 se0220439 ask * 1526 0 17,6537 58,8152 se0220440 borgm starholmen * 16,7 0 17,5726 58,8869 se0220443 gorsingeholmskullarna * 7,2 0 17,0547 59,3479 se0220503 fjellsk fte 19,8 0 16,3525 59,1274 se0220504 ormsj bergen * 46,6 0 16,4146 59,1915 se0220505 varglyan * 40,7 0 16,4031 59,2011 se0220506 hvalsta * 16,7 0 16,4517 59,056 se0220507 lund ng 7,5 0 16,636 58,7425 se0220509 kr m * 243,6 0 17,6464 58,8502 se0220511 s dra l mund * 15,9 0 17,4933 58,8515 se0220513 rinkesta s g 3,2 0 16,7034 59,2275 se0220514 hasta 5,4 0 16,8393 59,4162 se0220515 gorsingelund * 10 0 17,0395 59,3475 se0220516 g let * 5,8 0 16,2556 58,9414 se0220517 rosmossen * 8,7 0 16,5919 59,1934 se0220519 duvtorp * 7,4 0 16,6564 59,3195 se0220601 stenby ng 23,1 0 16,4776 59,3634 se0220602 vilsta * 406,2 0 16,5099 59,3408 se0220603 jungfruvassen * 52,3 0 17,0992 58,7345 se0220604 malma sen 3,8 0 16,7189 59,1424 se0220606 n storp * 12,1 0 16,2024 59,0236 se0220701 veda n 1,5 0 17,282 58,9116 se0220702 sv rta n 5 0 17,0863 58,7943 se0220703 sibro 0,93 0 16,8828 58,9491 se0230023 ycke urskog * 32,5 0 15,4035 58,1224 se0230029 lysings urskog * 20,6 0 14,7815 58,1421 se0230038 p lsbo ng * 27,8 0 15,1682 58,202 se0230047 s ttra ngar * 21,6 0 14,8113 58,2642 se0230048 sabackarna 33,9 0 14,9281 58,29 se0230049 s by v sterskog * 21 0 15,7641 58,2508 se0230055 sankt anna och gryts sk rg rdar * 12 884,1 0 17,0819 58,3898 se0230056 isberga 23,5 0 14,71 58,2978 se0230067 t kern * 5 395,1 0 14,8135 58,3521 se0230069 rbackens kalkk rr * 10,5 0 15,1176 58,3727 se0230079 k rna mosse * 36,7 0 15,5328 58,4149 se0230082 l ngvr n * 3,1 0 14,9915 58,4889 se0230084 staffanstorp * 43,4 0 15,0895 58,5309 se0230087 sj bo-kn ppan * 38 0 15,0918 58,5487 se0230090 br viken yttre * 8 752,6 0 16,9787 58,5612 se0230100 glotternskogen * 200,8 0 16,1928 58,7132 se0230101 b rsj skogen * 42,6 0 16,2364 58,6979 se0230124 kungsbro * 101,2 0 15,5445 58,5012 se0230125 svart mynningen 321,7 0 15,5556 58,4644 se0230126 svensksundsviken * 1 977,2 0 16,4044 58,6101 se0230127 bj rka-s by * 302,4 0 15,7437 58,2798 se0230128 harsbo-sverkersholm * 50,5 0 16,3221 58,3662 se0230129 adelsn s * 79,2 0 15,9761 58,1859 se0230130 sturefors * 129,4 0 15,7641 58,3325 se0230131 stafs ter * 56,6 0 15,6745 58,2867 se0230132 solberga * 71,9 0 15,1974 58,3394 se0230133 ljusfors * 25,3 0 15,8757 58,5925 se0230134 h ndel * 22 0 16,2033 58,6126 se0230135 ekn n * 248,2 0 16,6685 58,422 se0230136 sj vik * 39,7 0 15,3394 57,9429 se0230137 rocks mosse * 102,6 0 15,366 57,9455 se0230138 svikelandet-kv d * 6 279,1 0 16,795 58,0441 se0230140 v gg * 225 0 16,9137 58,2761 se0230142 bok * 415 0 16,8476 58,0877 se0230143 brokinds l vskogar 34,7 0 15,671 58,1888 se0230144 hagebyh ga * 28,3 0 14,9457 58,4676 se0230145 hallstad ngar * 6,7 0 15,6483 58,1513 se0230147 kr keryd * 31,9 0 14,6011 58,1999 se0230149 ombergsliden * 22,7 0 14,6877 58,3572 se0230150 ostmossen * 33,2 0 14,6884 58,3505 se0230151 uggel * 383,4 0 16,7466 58,3812 se0230152 s travallen * 10,4 0 15,7607 58,2078 se0230154 orrkojg larnas dom nreservat * 52,7 0 16,0342 58,6833 se0230156 f gelmossen * 149,3 0 15,2153 58,6685 se0230157 fj llmossen stg tadelen * 463,5 0 16,5301 58,6934 se0230158 djurs * 418,5 0 16,8007 58,4047 se0230159 ngelholm * 57,2 0 16,79 58,287 se0230160 norsholm * 67,7 0 15,9682 58,5127 se0230161 borg * 15,6 0 16,0885 58,5713 se0230162 r ckeskog * 34,7 0 15,7985 58,1224 se0230163 sund * 35,6 0 15,2535 57,8561 se0230164 brokinds skolhage * 33,5 0 15,6646 58,2078 se0230165 l nningehult * 33,4 0 15,8062 57,879 se0230166 kl mmesm len * 18,7 0 14,9284 58,1396 se0230167 jonsberg * 25,3 0 16,8305 58,5301 se0230168 stortorp * 42,7 0 14,9087 58,2248 se0230169 t rnevik * 9,5 0 15,5654 58,1942 se0230170 heda-uttersberg 18,6 0 14,6961 58,285 se0230171 sken s * 35,1 0 16,5586 58,6267 se0230172 b rshult * 33,9 0 15,0443 58,1544 se0230173 smedstorp * 21,6 0 15,4133 57,9442 se0230174 s dra br ta * 31,8 0 15,4309 57,7134 se0230175 lillsj k rret 52,6 0 15,2015 58,7496 se0230176 k rnskogsmossen * 847,7 0 15,3203 58,8417 se0230177 sandstorpsk rret * 32,4 0 15,3476 57,7815 se0230178 hulebo * 31,9 0 15,9243 57,9997 se0230179 fr jerum * 83 0 16,2143 58,2455 se0230180 herrborum * 122,1 0 16,696 58,3613 se0230181 norrkrog * 16,3 0 16,6054 58,4461 se0230182 bj ln s 31,2 0 15,2363 58,0207 se0230183 pukeh l * 55,2 0 15,306 58,058 se0230184 narb ck * 19,3 0 14,5481 58,1151 se0230185 suseh l * 10,7 0 15,3714 57,7384 se0230187 hamra * 25,9 0 15,7881 58,1169 se0230188 knastraberget * 6,1 0 15,8566 58,044 se0230189 h gerstad * 6,2 0 16,3352 58,1377 se0230190 runstorp * 32,2 0 15,9298 58,5153 se0230191 ingelsta * 13,4 0 16,1681 58,6158 se0230192 stj rn -f gelvik * 36,1 0 16,6975 58,1257 se0230193 rosebo * 12,5 0 15,105 57,9928 se0230194 ivran s naturreservat * 30,9 0 15,3512 57,9794 se0230195 bona * 11,6 0 15,3875 57,7527 se0230196 gamla m la 2,4 0 15,4409 58,07 se0230198 h rsj * 13,9 0 15,8666 58,1515 se0230199 kattedal * 33,8 0 16,6671 58,1361 se0230200 m nsabola * 18,4 0 14,7499 58,2093 se0230201 nybygget-duvhult * 10,3 0 16,0831 58,7146 se0230203 restad * 54,8 0 15,8466 58,5965 se0230204 skruvhult * 58,6 0 14,8129 58,0894 se0230205 stora ulvebo * 17,5 0 16,6708 58,3877 se0230206 sv rtinge * 19,5 0 16,0254 58,6384 se0230207 treh rna * 28,1 0 14,8325 58,1499 se0230208 ngaryd * 12,6 0 15,1986 57,8696 se0230209 stermem * 9,3 0 16,6381 58,4943 se0230210 br tberget * 25,6 0 15,9257 58,0344 se0230211 farsboviken * 21,3 0 15,7284 58,5284 se0230212 flatmossen * 19,6 0 16,7646 58,276 se0230213 k lem la knapp * 14,3 0 15,3297 57,8762 se0230214 h khult * 19,2 0 15,8909 57,8815 se0230215 tv nget * 56,2 0 15,9082 58,0319 se0230216 silver n * 56,9 0 15,355 57,7278 se0230217 lunderna 11,1 0 15,881 58,3971 se0230218 svenneby 6,3 0 15,9259 58,3936 se0230219 tvidsn s * 21,6 0 16,0314 58,1883 se0230220 ruda 1,9 0 15,3632 58,5376 se0230221 bertilsbo * 13 0 16,0188 58,1796 se0230222 malmviks ngen * 4,8 0 15,9324 58,2071 se0230223 fornborgen-gr vsten * 21,1 0 15,8981 58,3497 se0230224 herrs tter * 16,9 0 15,963 58,2884 se0230225 bj rhult * 18,1 0 15,1708 58,0486 se0230226 b sebo * 12,2 0 15,1108 58,1138 se0230227 g kshult * 21 0 15,2229 58,1061 se0230228 karsbo * 26,6 0 15,0969 58,1492 se0230229 valla-ingvaldstorp * 145,7 0 14,8084 58,2879 se0230230 stockmossen * 130,3 0 15,8798 58,2578 se0230231 galms s * 26,1 0 15,9611 58,0546 se0230233 brodderyds ng 0,98 0 14,6718 58,2183 se0230234 djupviksb cken 3 0 16,6746 58,6371 se0230235 ekeberg v sterg rd 1,8 0 15,1798 58,2575 se0230236 djur n * 35,6 0 16,3557 58,6267 se0230237 ekhult * 16,9 0 16,0124 57,94 se0230238 ekhultebergen * 175,8 0 16,2419 58,1429 se0230239 fr nntorpk rret 2,2 0 15,246 58,4927 se0230240 ringarhults n * 133,3 0 15,2322 58,6901 se0230241 gumby-bultsbols odlingslandskap * 73,1 0 14,6314 58,1635 se0230242 idhult * 66,3 0 15,949 57,9966 se0230243 g tala kalkfukt ng 1,6 0 15,0894 58,4491 se0230244 v stra karlsbo kalkk rr 1,7 0 14,6863 58,3548 se0230245 korph lorna * 100,9 0 15,3918 57,7672 se0230246 kottorp * 19 0 15,478 58,546 se0230247 kronberga ng 0,41 0 14,6801 58,2204 se0230248 kulla ngar * 21 0 16,0563 58,0968 se0230249 kushults ng 0,21 0 14,5885 58,1757 se0230250 lagmansro k llmyr 0,47 0 15,0515 58,4179 se0230251 k ttilstad * 30,6 0 15,7707 58,1052 se0230252 l rkem len * 13,9 0 14,8895 58,1352 se0230254 omberg * 760,6 0 14,6554 58,3194 se0230255 ramshult * 26,9 0 15,3061 58,2307 se0230256 r dg len-svartg len * 297,2 0 16,1216 58,6914 se0230257 sibborp * 12,6 0 15,4556 58,5771 se0230258 sj storpsmyren * 7,6 0 14,6559 58,2456 se0230259 stora ljunamyren 1,1 0 15,027 58,3113 se0230260 sunneby * 6 0 14,6372 58,1818 se0230261 svensmar * 308,4 0 16,7743 58,3259 se0230262 s rstugan * 9,5 0 15,399 58,139 se0230263 s tramarken * 18,2 0 16,0856 58,6968 se0230264 mj ln s sumpskog * 3,1 0 16,2201 58,8059 se0230265 tyttorp * 14 0 15,4988 58,5399 se0230266 uggleholmarna * 50,8 0 16,8991 58,3934 se0230267 vessers udde 7,3 0 15,7288 58,259 se0230268 v ttern ( stra) 64 287,4 0 14,6997 58,4221 se0230269 vida v ttern * 17,4 0 14,568 58,1509 se0230271 lgbos tter 2,5 0 15,624 58,2365 se0230272 lstadsj n 48 0 15,8335 58,6975 se0230273 ssby lind ng * 1,4 0 16,1333 58,4368 se0230274 hattorp * 26,7 0 16,0052 58,464 se0230275 kristberg * 13,9 0 15,2077 58,5748 se0230276 stora och lilla l pg l * 9,7 0 16,2328 58,1927 se0230277 magnehults dom nreservat * 2,4 0 16,0293 58,8115 se0230278 stubba ekhage * 5,6 0 15,2281 58,5831 se0230279 tolefors-lagerlunda 38,4 0 15,4784 58,3948 se0230281 algutsbo * 10,9 0 16,2728 58,6765 se0230282 bj rka s by ng * 1,1 0 15,7434 58,262 se0230283 bj s tter-perstorp * 16,2 0 15,5996 58,551 se0230284 bj s tter * 6,3 0 15,6056 58,5588 se0230286 b sem len * 16,6 0 14,9267 58,1792 se0230287 dammhulte n 9 0 16,2726 58,8028 se0230288 holmsj hult ngen 1,1 0 15,658 58,844 se0230289 iglingen * 1,5 0 15,8316 58,6218 se0230290 kamphemmets ng 0,6 0 14,8296 58,279 se0230291 kvillingef rkastningen * 189,7 0 16,1109 58,6507 se0230292 misterfall * 8,7 0 15,5009 57,9762 se0230293 stora grundg len * 3,4 0 16,2816 58,7875 se0230294 ramsdal * 25,3 0 16,7065 58,313 se0230295 sj kroken * 8,7 0 15,4507 58,0192 se0230296 stora kullen * 42 0 14,845 58,2971 se0230297 hovan s kalkfukt ng 1,4 0 14,6983 58,3925 se0230298 borghamns kalkk rr * 2,9 0 14,6905 58,3854 se0230299 marstad * 11,2 0 15,0145 58,3915 se0230300 soldat ngen motala * 3,4 0 15,0684 58,5663 se0230301 tvidabergs t tort * 9,8 0 16,0012 58,1929 se0230302 stentorpsmyren-svarthagen 4,3 0 15,0473 58,3179 se0230303 krankensj arnas sumpskogar * 34,5 0 16,301 58,7491 se0230304 jonsbo * 10 0 15,769 57,9536 se0230305 motala ng * 10,3 0 15,6631 58,9303 se0230306 skriketorpsravinen * 8,5 0 16,1507 58,6798 se0230307 byckorp 11,9 0 15,1373 58,5109 se0230308 b ck ngsmon * 15,1 0 15,8748 58,0851 se0230309 fallingeberg * 53,9 0 16,4791 58,2287 se0230310 gr ns sl tter ng * 3,3 0 16,9653 58,2335 se0230311 hagalund * 10,2 0 14,9761 58,4947 se0230312 rinnamyren 0,18 0 14,9507 58,2869 se0230313 ryda * 18,5 0 15,8902 57,9985 se0230314 val * 33,9 0 15,922 58,0115 se0230315 skrikstad 1,3 0 15,2007 58,4801 se0230316 torrberga rikk rr och sumpskog * 1,6 0 15,5912 58,3553 se0230318 asketorp * 26,9 0 15,7441 58,8668 se0230320 lilla morlejan * 16,2 0 14,6746 58,1014 se0230321 malm landets ekbackar * 29,7 0 16,2566 58,6491 se0230322 vegalla * 224 0 16,2003 58,3078 se0230323 v stra eneby * 3,9 0 15,7052 58,0063 se0230324 v stra harg * 294,9 0 15,2575 58,2567 se0230325 granstugan 0,61 0 15,0237 57,9192 se0230326 rberga 1,5 0 14,8172 58,4374 se0230327 asp ja sl tter ng 0,3 0 16,9567 58,4267 se0230328 missj * 1 832,9 0 16,9766 58,3457 se0230329 ekebergs l vskog * 32,7 0 14,8639 58,1681 se0230330 ek n dovern * 38,2 0 15,8388 58,655 se0230331 holkaberg * 53,9 0 14,5572 58,1237 se0230332 kimstad ekbacke * 6,1 0 15,9805 58,5385 se0230333 pr st ngsuddens l vskog * 12,2 0 15,8949 58,9439 se0230334 stockhult * 8,6 0 15,5335 58,8445 se0230335 govl sa kalktorr ng 0,73 0 15,2352 58,4323 se0230336 torpa sterg rd * 3,2 0 14,8854 58,2867 se0230337 trolleflod * 119,4 0 15,3977 58,8334 se0230338 trulstorpet * 9,8 0 16,0307 58,1058 se0230339 bredsj mossen * 209,3 0 15,2036 58,7864 se0230340 gibbehult * 30,1 0 15,4438 57,9258 se0230341 s dra h ggebo * 9,8 0 15,3974 58,1781 se0230342 tinner eklandskap * 616,4 0 15,6129 58,369 se0230343 h leberget * 47,5 0 15,018 58,6053 se0230344 fagerhult * 24,3 0 15,1667 57,8971 se0230345 fundshult * 41,8 0 15,4468 57,7747 se0230346 stora hj lmmossen * 102,9 0 15,6219 58,6222 se0230347 petersborg * 4,7 0 15,0662 58,576 se0230348 hilltorps kalkk rr 12,1 0 15,0433 58,5047 se0230349 vidingsj * 78,9 0 15,6441 58,3654 se0230350 hanekulla * 54,4 0 15,8768 58,1644 se0230351 klevberget sonebo * 10,3 0 15,6356 58,1496 se0230352 vagnsmossen * 129,9 0 16,2419 58,5221 se0230353 ullst mma * 67,2 0 15,6649 58,3528 se0230354 marmorbruket * 26,7 0 16,4355 58,6594 se0230355 f llings * 30,7 0 15,6029 57,9796 se0230356 l ngserum * 39,9 0 16,2753 58,2602 se0230357 demark * 54,8 0 14,8073 58,1414 se0230358 h gved * 23,8 0 16,743 58,1698 se0230359 bonderyd * 18 0 14,7491 58,1878 se0230360 yxefall * 10 0 15,5835 58,0344 se0230361 ribbingsholm * 29,1 0 15,8856 58,5924 se0230363 gelsj n * 264,4 0 16,1 58,6824 se0230364 h sten s * 481,8 0 16,255 58,2774 se0230365 kastad kulle torr ng 3,4 0 14,8434 58,4221 se0230366 krogsfall * 24,4 0 15,6188 58,044 se0230367 lunnsj skogen * 21,7 0 16,1222 58,6601 se0230368 ramunderberget * 170,9 0 16,3274 58,4869 se0230369 stora lund 34,9 0 14,6159 58,2629 se0230370 stora rimm * 402,3 0 16,8172 58,4284 se0230371 ullebergsskogen * 44,1 0 15,3317 58,1477 se0230372 uvmar * 55,6 0 16,8503 58,3283 se0230373 v sterby * 175,5 0 15,6711 58,2498 se0230374 stora mossen (igelfors) * 392,1 0 15,6165 58,8471 se0230375 trang lamyren ( stg tadelen) * 57,1 0 15,1674 57,7074 se0230376 br xvik * 97,3 0 16,7726 58,5654 se0230377 ingelstorp * 16,9 0 16,0157 58,2548 se0230378 ramn - och uts ttersfj rden * 118,2 0 16,8169 58,5439 se0230379 tokorp * 11,7 0 15,5698 58,5666 se0230380 tyresfall * 19,9 0 15,6652 58,9188 se0230381 st mma * 21,8 0 15,2291 58,2316 se0230382 passdals n * 6 0 16,6669 58,3288 se0230383 stor n vid falerum 44,7 0 16,1665 58,1572 se0230384 bomhult * 23,6 0 14,8565 58,2095 se0230385 bibergsk rren * 70 0 15,3809 58,8418 se0230386 s dra freberga-jerusalemsviken * 11,4 0 15,0143 58,512 se0230387 viggeby * 637,9 0 15,6491 58,1905 se0230390 pinnarpsb cken/sten n * 6,3 0 15,5103 57,968 se0230391 g ta kanal (v ttern-roxen) 110,6 0 15,0606 58,5437 se0230392 lera kalkk rr 1,1 0 15,5211 58,4424 se0230393 v lberga mosse * 67,3 0 15,2646 58,5432 se0230394 s dra lunda * 219,5 0 17,0107 58,49 se0230395 arn (delar av) * 132 0 16,7485 58,0983 se0230396 kullarp * 42,9 0 15,2359 57,7583 se0230397 kapell n vid lagerlunda * 5 0 15,4876 58,397 se0240001 tivedens nationalpark (v stra) * 962,3 0 14,5976 58,7184 se0240002 fagert rn * 35,4 0 14,701 58,762 se0240004 snavlunda tj lvesta * 156,4 0 14,8894 58,9675 se0240007 rankemossen * 288,5 0 14,5131 59,0442 se0240009 skagershultsmossen * 449 0 14,7218 59,1122 se0240011 sotterns sk rg rd * 707 0 15,4681 59,0385 se0240017 latorps ngarna * 7 0 14,9818 59,2807 se0240020 uggleh jden * 23,3 0 14,6419 59,2276 se0240021 r mossen-lomtj rnsmossen * 62,1 0 14,6516 59,2678 se0240022 trang rdet * 231,3 0 14,758 59,3502 se0240024 n smarkerna 51,7 0 14,7812 59,4271 se0240027 stra trolldalen * 18 0 14,9654 59,3781 se0240028 kvarnb cken-l rkes n 70,1 0 15,0246 59,4754 se0240029 brunstorpsk rret * 5,3 0 15,247 59,3655 se0240030 liaskogen * 63,9 0 15,3393 59,4415 se0240032 gr nbo * 490,4 0 15,4459 59,6235 se0240034 murstensdalen * 762,2 0 14,5367 59,5431 se0240035 bj rskogsn s * 15,1 0 14,4896 59,6895 se0240036 hammarmossen * 154,4 0 14,4954 59,7616 se0240037 knuth jdsmossen * 98,2 0 14,4814 59,7941 se0240038 limberget * 44,3 0 14,8409 59,6831 se0240039 kindla * 932,7 0 14,8966 59,7477 se0240040 salbokn s * 73 0 14,937 59,8019 se0240042 r myren * 236,9 0 14,8361 59,8583 se0240043 st llbergsmossen * 293,2 0 14,7514 59,938 se0240045 norra v tterns sk rg rd * 2127 0 14,8719 58,7772 se0240048 v ster smossen * 375,8 0 14,383 59,9339 se0240051 dovrasj dalen * 51,5 0 14,958 59,0092 se0240052 fisksj n 45,9 0 14,4616 59,3072 se0240053 herrfalls ng * 43,4 0 15,2459 59,0738 se0240054 garphyttans nationalpark * 110,6 0 14,8928 59,2802 se0240055 lvhytte ngen * 8,9 0 14,8221 59,4387 se0240056 ek sen * 51,7 0 14,9276 59,1221 se0240057 nalavibergs ek ng * 13,4 0 14,9335 59,0594 se0240058 kvismarens naturreservat * 740,3 0 15,3994 59,1697 se0240059 oset-rynningeviken * 538,3 0 15,2682 59,2868 se0240061 utn set * 162,7 0 14,7234 58,6948 se0240062 ger sen * 36,4 0 14,8876 59,054 se0240063 j rle n * 108 0 15,1303 59,5247 se0240064 stra s lsj mossen * 103,2 0 14,3053 59,1973 se0240065 lomtj rnsmossen * 28,8 0 14,5216 59,1973 se0240066 juarbergen * 10,8 0 14,4945 58,8764 se0240067 helgedomen * 26,4 0 15,369 59,6656 se0240069 sk llersta pr st ng * 20,5 0 15,3407 59,1439 se0240070 rockebro * 30,2 0 14,71 58,9147 se0240071 kr ksj sen * 33,5 0 14,5843 58,8738 se0240072 lidetorpsmon 81,2 0 14,3578 59,1648 se0240073 gr ngshytteforsarna 5,2 0 14,7831 59,7164 se0240074 mantorp * 134 0 15,3021 59,3507 se0240075 trystorps ek ng * 44,1 0 14,8377 59,0855 se0240076 r svalens naturreservat 7,2 0 15,205 59,6239 se0240077 lillsj b cken-j rlehytteb cken 18,9 0 15,1179 59,5545 se0240078 bj rka lertag 17,7 0 15,1146 59,1107 se0240079 glottrak rret-venerna 137,5 0 15,4032 58,9049 se0240081 kamptj rnsbr nnan * 100 0 14,6316 59,9875 se0240082 s r n * 22 0 15,4227 59,1821 se0240083 f ran 15,7 0 15,6911 59,1759 se0240084 svartk rr * 3,7 0 14,9288 59,2379 se0240085 nittenmossen- stra * 38 0 14,7421 60,0723 se0240086 sp ngab cken * 34,6 0 15,1269 59,5886 se0240087 s rsj n 5,6 0 15,146 58,8865 se0240088 munkhyttan 42,4 0 15,1285 59,607 se0240089 vargavidderna * 499,5 0 14,4765 59,0071 se0240090 lejak rret 4,2 0 15,0757 59,6461 se0240091 skagershultsmossen-torp * 175 0 14,7509 59,1226 se0240092 tallskaten * 24 0 14,8686 59,6948 se0240093 brattforsen * 14,2 0 14,7638 59,9854 se0240094 t sta 10,2 0 15,4252 59,3454 se0240096 h kansbodaberget * 36,9 0 14,9087 59,6947 se0240097 erikaberget * 73,4 0 14,8227 59,6829 se0240098 k n s * 24,3 0 15,4839 59,4912 se0240099 v ttern (norra) 8 131,3 0 14,8826 58,7241 se0240100 sp ngab cken-norra 15,9 0 15,1316 59,5952 se0240101 olles hage * 9,2 0 15,4826 59,148 se0240103 treh rnings masugn 0,57 0 15,1572 58,8475 se0240104 kojemossen * 577,9 0 14,574 58,8642 se0240105 dammossen-r bergshagemossen * 47,6 0 15,0727 59,4571 se0240106 kopparbergs ng * 14,3 0 15,2837 58,931 se0240107 vre nitt lvsdalen * 83,5 0 14,7626 60,0078 se0240108 grythem * 3,7 0 15,6058 59,3204 se0240109 slyte * 2,2 0 15,5368 59,3122 se0240110 lekeberga-s lven * 32 0 14,8799 59,2304 se0240111 sk le * 12,1 0 15,2137 58,9961 se0240112 klockarudden * 2,6 0 15,4869 59,0139 se0240113 ullavi * 3 0 15,3572 59,1198 se0240114 orrkulla * 3,6 0 14,8432 59,0128 se0240115 prinskullen * 14,9 0 14,944 58,8437 se0240116 tomta hagar * 18,1 0 15,0577 59,0476 se0240117 nitt lvsbr nnan * 107,7 0 14,8067 59,9296 se0240118 viby ek ng * 1,1 0 14,877 59,0583 se0240119 h gforsskogen * 2,9 0 14,5792 59,3832 se0240120 harge uddar * 32,8 0 14,9285 58,7751 se0240121 j nsaskogen * 13,7 0 14,8392 59,2715 se0240122 kroksj skogen * 97,5 0 14,5695 59,2153 se0240123 h sselkulla * 3,2 0 15,0052 59,2385 se0240124 v stra och stora krokt rn 2,9 0 14,6889 58,7412 se0240125 broby ng * 11,1 0 14,9366 59,0653 se0240126 lindhult * 1,8 0 14,9942 59,0276 se0240127 torkesviken 2,2 0 14,5867 59,3499 se0240128 bo * 2,9 0 15,5354 58,9172 se0240129 hagaberg * 3 0 14,8564 58,9429 se0240130 sps tter 0,04 0 14,9256 59,2516 se0240131 nnaboda * 47,5 0 14,9169 59,3321 se0240132 dunderklintarna * 118,4 0 14,8399 59,2892 se0240133 venak rret * 67,2 0 14,8284 59,4479 se0240134 vissberga lertag 12,1 0 15,1117 59,1092 se0240135 sp sa * 7,3 0 14,8312 58,9445 se0240136 lind n * 15,4 0 15,5883 59,2297 se0240137 stora kortorp * 15,2 0 15,2635 58,9814 se0240138 hj rttorp * 11,2 0 15,2631 58,9451 se0240139 sixtorp * 9,2 0 14,6477 59,1825 se0240140 lekhyttan * 4,8 0 14,8355 59,2461 se0240141 h rvesta norra * 32,1 0 14,9268 59,1425 se0240142 svenshyttan * 9 0 14,8844 59,2747 se0240143 s dra vissboda * 6,3 0 14,7764 59,2369 se0240144 vinna * 8,2 0 14,7955 58,9102 se0240145 norra nyckelhult * 10,3 0 15,1234 58,984 se0240146 finn kerssj n- sterhammarssj n 74 0 15,5387 59,526 se0240147 n set * 9,2 0 14,5071 58,8137 se0240148 venen * 3,1 0 14,8451 59,4493 se0240149 hyttebacken 3,4 0 14,9538 59,4096 se0240150 pr stg rden 14,9 0 15,3817 59,0116 se0240151 gr nelid * 14,9 0 14,5297 58,7389 se0240152 berga 4,5 0 15,2342 59,3937 se0240153 norra mossby * 2,3 0 15,2329 59,1119 se0240154 s dra mossby 0,61 0 15,2406 59,1053 se0240155 ekeby-almby 4,6 0 15,321 59,261 se0240156 tysslingen 694,3 0 15,0453 59,3083 se0240157 viken * 20 0 15,0911 58,983 se0240158 berget 0,56 0 15,4059 59,3213 se0240159 brom ngen 19 0 14,8201 59,4586 se0240160 uttertj rnsberget * 275 0 14,7813 59,9198 se0240161 djupedal * 15,3 0 14,7779 58,7979 se0240162 j tteberget * 107,1 0 14,5321 59,2025 se0240163 stormossen mickelsrud * 274,8 0 14,3137 59,1459 se0240164 svennevads n 39,6 0 15,2838 59,0253 se0250005 str msholm * 2 389,8 0 16,2443 59,4783 se0250006 kalvholmen * 37,9 0 16,4049 59,483 se0250008 rid arkipelagen * 5 635,4 0 16,6196 59,5024 se0250009 ngs * 7 223,9 0 16,8738 59,5239 se0250010 h stholmarna * 47,1 0 16,5842 59,5855 se0250018 lappland * 968,4 0 15,7645 59,7942 se0250019 stora flyten och stormossen * 922,1 0 15,974 59,8218 se0250022 vitmossen * 157 0 16,3984 59,8578 se0250024 r myran * 116,8 0 15,5496 59,8763 se0250031 kolpelle * 25,6 0 16,6713 60,086 se0250032 bredmossen syd * 133,2 0 16,0834 60,1393 se0250033 bysj holmarna * 11,1 0 16,5461 60,1733 se0250038 steng rdet * 42,8 0 16,1102 59,3629 se0250043 lstabr ndan * 291,5 0 16,7432 59,9737 se0250052 t ngsta * 199,6 0 15,9821 59,6108 se0250095 ask -tid * 896,7 0 16,4776 59,517 se0250097 fermansbo urskog * 240,3 0 16,2139 59,8276 se0250098 n tmyran 394,6 0 16,3101 59,9492 se0250099 h skovsmossen * 104,4 0 16,1829 59,8854 se0250100 djupebo * 45,2 0 16,1162 59,721 se0250103 hedstr mmen * 38,4 0 15,7537 59,6792 se0250104 fl ckebo * 81,6 0 16,3426 59,8873 se0250106 kalkugnsberget * 28,5 0 15,7627 59,4015 se0250107 silvtj rn * 23,1 0 15,8344 60,0608 se0250108 j nsbacken 9 0 15,7276 59,9683 se0250109 svartberget-hedk rra * 21,3 0 15,7406 59,9792 se0250112 grevensberg * 2,1 0 16,1211 60,1249 se0250113 sl ttermossen * 18,5 0 15,7791 59,8552 se0250114 matkullen * 6,6 0 15,599 59,9021 se0250115 lgberget * 1,9 0 15,937 60,1782 se0250116 g smyrberget * 8,2 0 16,0465 60,1432 se0250117 komossen * 16,6 0 16,131 60,0996 se0250118 fr benbenning * 5,4 0 16,0982 60,1166 se0250127 slottsholmen 1,6 0 16,0414 59,422 se0250128 sandskogsbacken * 11,9 0 16,0551 59,4188 se0250130 sk ret * 11,4 0 15,9752 59,4162 se0250131 reutersberg * 9,3 0 15,988 59,4101 se0250132 s dra hammaren * 11,5 0 15,8311 59,29 se0250133 lind berget st * 9,5 0 16,0782 59,4824 se0250134 h ggholmen * 11,2 0 16,2311 59,5026 se0250135 lindholmen * 19,8 0 16,2197 59,4976 se0250136 ekholmen 11,7 0 16,2301 59,4957 se0250137 kyrkby sen 7,8 0 16,2394 59,5574 se0250141 h ltj rnsb cken 17,1 0 15,5236 59,9224 se0250142 r vallsmossen och stingsmossen * 536,3 0 16,2597 59,7517 se0250144 fuller * 120,4 0 16,5398 59,5289 se0250145 fr s ker * 505,7 0 16,7624 59,5182 se0250147 gorgen 216,8 0 16,2527 59,9334 se0250148 gussj n 101,4 0 16,3789 59,8972 se0250151 vrenninge 76,8 0 16,3544 59,8413 se0250153 fl cksj n * 926,8 0 16,3214 59,8725 se0250154 r rbosj n * 213,2 0 16,3067 59,8313 se0250155 str msholms kungsladug rd * 6,1 0 16,2418 59,5195 se0250158 lind berget v st 34,8 0 16,0692 59,4832 se0250159 bj rkbacken 1,1 0 16,1137 59,7331 se0250160 kohagen * 8,6 0 16,2143 59,7215 se0250161 sund ngen 109,4 0 16,8385 59,568 se0250162 versk lby 0,05 0 16,1115 59,5179 se0250163 munktorps-ekeby 0,01 0 16,1871 59,4977 se0250164 lia 0,03 0 16,1591 59,5263 se0250170 salakalken * 269,4 0 16,5667 59,9102 se0250172 granhammarsbr nnan * 158,7 0 16,0351 59,3871 se0250173 m rkrets backe * 6,3 0 16,0556 59,4361 se0250182 lermansbo ng 0,5 0 15,6703 59,7215 se0250183 fors n-br tmossen * 92,3 0 15,5343 59,7719 se0250184 sillbotorp * 4,2 0 15,7084 59,7642 se0250185 venab cken 28,7 0 15,937 59,6798 se0250186 najfallet * 19,4 0 15,6732 59,3445 se0250187 karsbo ng 0,8 0 15,9136 60,1306 se0250188 kulflyten * 125,8 0 15,8321 59,9017 se0250190 j tt sarna * 30 0 15,7465 59,9853 se0250191 nyby * 1,7 0 15,7262 59,3649 se0250192 dal * 2 0 15,7589 59,4259 se0250193 brattberget * 1 0 15,8788 59,3556 se0250194 sj lunda * 1,7 0 15,8687 59,3266 se0250195 v llen * 3,2 0 16,4829 59,9126 se0310016 draven 435,8 0 13,6504 57,1572 se0310017 fegen ( stra) * 2 050,8 0 13,1597 57,1821 se0310020 store mosse nationalpark * 7 674,7 0 13,9438 57,2849 se0310072 komosse * 1 454,9 0 13,732 57,7102 se0310106 ramlaklint/uvaberget * 25,1 0 14,4183 57,848 se0310201 skilsn s 27,7 0 14,0907 57,0438 se0310202 h gakull * 12,6 0 14,3497 57,083 se0310203 liljen s * 42,4 0 13,7674 57,0773 se0310206 rusarebo * 31,7 0 14,1731 57,1401 se0310207 moens urskog * 18,6 0 14,2651 57,1831 se0310208 kr ketorpsskogen (norra) * 32,4 0 14,7932 57,2257 se0310209 vintermossen * 61,6 0 14,9287 57,2416 se0310210 stora och lilla fly * 112,2 0 15,2084 57,2582 se0310211 helvetets h la * 7,2 0 15,2944 57,2831 se0310212 h garp * 48,1 0 15,4985 57,337 se0310213 bj rkekull * 4,5 0 15,1452 57,3728 se0310214 tjusthult * 115,1 0 15,3482 57,4649 se0310215 marieholmsskogen * 259,9 0 13,8841 57,399 se0310216 anderstorp, store mosse * 1 779,8 0 13,6053 57,3249 se0310217 g rahov 8,9 0 14,1442 57,5315 se0310219 taberg * 66 0 14,0793 57,6821 se0310220 bottnaryds urskog * 37,6 0 13,8375 57,7662 se0310221 dumme mosse * 2 934,2 0 14,0123 57,794 se0310224 sen * 12,6 0 14,5228 57,9089 se0310225 huluskogen * 39,1 0 14,6134 58,0657 se0310226 girab cken * 8,9 0 14,5094 58,0684 se0310317 ett deltat * 27,8 0 13,6386 57,4366 se0310318 minne * 15,4 0 13,9052 57,1257 se0310319 v stan * 144,4 0 14,4076 57,986 se0310320 knutstorp * 25,9 0 14,8649 57,7582 se0310321 villstad * 8 0 13,4588 57,2019 se0310322 ljunga-mossaryd 5,1 0 14,5826 57,3839 se0310323 repperda * 53,8 0 15,3338 57,3935 se0310326 ren 918,9 0 14,578 57,9785 se0310327 hj lms nga * 18,2 0 14,2141 56,9616 se0310331 illharjen * 42,8 0 15,1 57,4134 se0310332 komstad 0,46 0 14,6177 57,4062 se0310333 assj n 493,9 0 14,9499 57,797 se0310334 f rsj n (eksj ) 257 0 15,1084 57,6718 se0310335 mycklaflon 1 153,5 0 15,2514 57,571 se0310336 vista kulle * 14 0 14,2727 57,8554 se0310337 g eryds rasbranter * 3,2 0 14,354 57,316 se0310338 vr ngen 160,3 0 15,3228 57,4864 se0310339 s t sasj n 122 0 14,6882 57,9488 se0310340 lind sasj n 70,8 0 15,1974 57,3892 se0310341 kansj n 77,2 0 14,5351 57,6396 se0310342 str nnesj n 11,8 0 14,9671 58,0609 se0310343 fj rasj 34,8 0 15,2561 57,6064 se0310344 f r sen * 8,8 0 15,1253 57,6732 se0310345 b rsebo och holmen * 30,3 0 15,3314 57,6198 se0310346 skurugata * 133,8 0 15,0856 57,6978 se0310347 botorp * 37,5 0 14,7471 57,9865 se0310401 ljunghems backar * 20,9 0 13,808 58,0409 se0310402 k pstad-biskopsbo * 26,7 0 14,4875 57,3625 se0310403 vikskvarn * 25 0 14,6068 57,5303 se0310404 skillingarydsf ltet * 1 101,6 0 14,1359 57,4547 se0310406 em n (v stra) 186,5 0 15,233 57,4351 se0310407 s llevads n (v stra) * 264 0 15,6149 57,4679 se0310408 silver n (norra) 21 0 15,5019 57,6644 se0310409 gagn n * 317,2 0 14,0534 58,0057 se0310410 jordanstorp * 16,7 0 14,518 58,0201 se0310411 solgens ar * 186,8 0 15,1435 57,5632 se0310412 mattarp 6 0 14,6154 57,491 se0310413 huskvarnabergen * 345,9 0 14,2847 57,816 se0310414 tostarp * 10,5 0 13,9632 57,514 se0310415 aggarp- shuvud 1,3 0 13,7747 57,262 se0310416 kruvebo-yxebo 1,1 0 13,3619 57,2396 se0310417 m ltorpet gransbo * 7,4 0 15,0665 57,994 se0310420 sp s * 2,8 0 13,5787 57,4548 se0310422 gr nlid * 2,9 0 14,8505 57,6459 se0310424 vallsj n 708,1 0 14,7606 57,4149 se0310425 bottenl sen 0,86 0 14,1234 58,055 se0310426 g llsj n 0,9 0 14,0701 58,036 se0310427 r dsj n 6,9 0 14,124 58,0473 se0310428 strandg len 6,1 0 14,0919 58,0453 se0310429 mossj n 50 0 13,9445 57,5347 se0310430 f rsj n (aneby) 159,4 0 14,9441 57,8685 se0310431 hindsen 1 267,3 0 14,1534 57,1882 se0310432 v ttern (s dra) 49 510,5 0 14,2917 58,0013 se0310433 vingen 237,3 0 14,7045 57,2353 se0310434 s dra vixen 509,3 0 14,8868 57,6153 se0310435 bordsj n 53,7 0 14,9825 57,8379 se0310436 herrstad-eket * 30,2 0 14,851 57,87 se0310501 r n * 89,1 0 14,2188 57,0725 se0310502 svinhults sen * 2,1 0 13,7911 57,5031 se0310503 oxhagsberget * 3,1 0 15,3142 57,3081 se0310504 k llen s dr * 7,4 0 13,8853 57,6463 se0310505 kv ns s bokar 5,6 0 15,0035 57,6844 se0310507 f rgsj mon * 18,5 0 15,4395 57,2819 se0310508 nennesmo * 59,1 0 13,5427 57,2066 se0310509 stolpaberg * 121,9 0 15,2283 57,2923 se0310510 svarta h ls vildmark * 118,1 0 15,2227 57,2374 se0310512 vretaholms eklandskap * 72,2 0 14,4912 58,0386 se0310513 gnylt n 11,7 0 15,4309 57,4542 se0310515 kakelugnsmossen * 85,5 0 15,0634 57,6737 se0310516 kulla * 14,1 0 15,1488 57,2051 se0310517 mo * 6,7 0 13,8971 57,3823 se0310518 bare mosse (v stra) * 397 0 13,9453 58,0073 se0310519 brattaberget * 24,2 0 14,6036 58,0423 se0310522 dr ngagr ten 1,7 0 14,6737 58,0097 se0310531 ryfors * 34,8 0 13,8339 57,9009 se0310532 sk mningsfors * 18,5 0 14,1574 58,1128 se0310533 stora k rr 4,3 0 14,1063 57,9057 se0310534 haboskogen * 8,3 0 14,1182 57,9605 se0310535 habomossens dr * 8,7 0 14,0467 57,9884 se0310601 svenshult och t l sen * 27,1 0 13,9558 57,9456 se0310602 flatered * 4 0 13,9343 57,947 se0310603 rserum * 7,7 0 14,5867 58,0048 se0310604 trishult * 12,5 0 14,8913 57,3485 se0310605 galln s * 26,2 0 14,2421 57,2413 se0310606 bratteborg * 35,4 0 14,0791 57,5598 se0310607 blaasl tten 0,75 0 13,8677 57,7238 se0310608 bl sm len * 15 0 15,4983 57,3234 se0310609 m cklarp * 7,2 0 15,3006 57,3855 se0310610 blankhester * 13,5 0 14,8527 58,0731 se0310611 lilla hult * 10,7 0 15,0961 57,2499 se0310612 hemmershaga * 2,7 0 14,1679 57,2978 se0310613 t rsbo * 9,3 0 14,5739 57,6617 se0310614 gulleg rde * 10,4 0 15,5623 57,6001 se0310615 isberga hage * 15,7 0 13,4272 57,2274 se0310616 k lleryds ekhage * 17,3 0 13,6461 57,4139 se0310617 ingarp * 8 0 13,8783 57,4366 se0310618 ryggestorp * 9,8 0 14,9655 57,957 se0310620 s dra duveled * 12,3 0 14,0902 57,476 se0310621 j boruder * 7,2 0 13,9272 57,9098 se0310622 allm nnings n * 12 0 14,9146 57,648 se0310624 labbrams ngen * 155,6 0 14,2643 56,9666 se0310626 erikstorp 0,22 0 14,5609 57,7235 se0310627 sl tteryd 0,18 0 14,5126 57,6393 se0310628 pr stekvarn 0,15 0 14,4222 57,9507 se0310629 h gaberg 0,24 0 14,5641 58,0171 se0310630 kabbarp 0,19 0 14,4983 58,0286 se0310632 hultarp 0,09 0 14,9723 57,9836 se0310633 str msholmsskogen * 7,4 0 14,4688 57,8453 se0310634 fus n 37 0 14,9092 57,5757 se0310635 f rjans maden 5 0 14,022 57,0517 se0310636 ekes s * 8 0 14,2607 57,4667 se0310637 solgen n 1,2 0 15,1087 57,4918 se0310638 holm n 0,57 0 14,1307 58,0732 se0310639 uppebo * 20,4 0 13,9524 57,338 se0310640 str keved-n ssja * 30,3 0 14,0011 57,3523 se0310641 h dinge * 40 0 14,0534 57,3075 se0310642 fiskeb ck * 22 0 14,0971 57,8873 se0310701 kr pplehult * 36,9 0 15,0278 57,5532 se0310702 mossebo * 1,4 0 13,6877 57,5404 se0310703 sunnaryd * 1,7 0 13,6988 57,0096 se0310704 stenbrohult * 3,4 0 13,637 57,3162 se0310705 h gask gle * 9,6 0 15,3872 57,578 se0310706 v rekulla * 3,7 0 15,5723 57,5874 se0310707 gr fthult 0,39 0 13,4869 57,2902 se0310708 tunnabo * 1,1 0 13,8607 57,5612 se0310709 sj mils s * 10 0 14,6845 57,5602 se0310710 v stra fagerhult * 2 0 14,6921 57,7713 se0310711 bj rnhult * 1,3 0 14,6175 57,2866 se0310712 hallstenstorp * 3,1 0 14,718 57,4015 se0310713 nykulla * 4,4 0 14,6405 57,2962 se0310714 l v sen * 6,5 0 14,0666 57,5647 se0310715 r nnhult * 4 0 14,1578 57,2287 se0310716 stora f llan * 2,6 0 13,9534 57,2027 se0310717 dr mminge 0,92 0 14,1334 57,1334 se0310718 s dra svinhult 1,5 0 13,7669 57,5127 se0310719 g eryd 0,28 0 14,3549 57,3141 se0310720 linneryd * 32 0 14,3454 57,5206 se0310721 stensj kvarn * 20,7 0 14,4076 57,4963 se0310722 grimstorp * 6,4 0 13,7857 58,0055 se0310723 fattarp * 7,7 0 14,5417 57,9595 se0310724 boda * 11,6 0 15,4459 57,3184 se0310725 v ndelstorp och m lskog * 5,9 0 14,5606 58,0846 se0310726 land * 7,5 0 14,3577 57,9567 se0310727 nyckel s * 150,6 0 13,7745 57,8516 se0310728 skams h l * 43,3 0 14,0824 57,796 se0310729 r byskogen * 115,7 0 14,4025 57,871 se0310730 grav * 16,6 0 14,3101 57,9126 se0310733 gagnaryds mosse * 251,2 0 13,9629 57,7049 se0310734 pr steryds- och ambomosse * 183,3 0 13,7872 57,7914 se0310735 dala- och knekta mosse * 1 878,3 0 14,2729 57,3067 se0310736 ekbergsparken * 16,9 0 14,9614 58,0246 se0310737 lm s askskog * 11,5 0 15,0457 58,0125 se0310738 lilla kungsbacken dr * 10,7 0 14,028 57,6113 se0310739 drags udde * 30,5 0 15,5906 57,4893 se0310741 stuverydsb cken * 77,9 0 15,2371 57,651 se0310742 stora gr nlid * 24,7 0 14,3019 56,9081 se0310743 l ngelaggen * 28,5 0 13,6334 57,3872 se0310744 stickel sa * 6,9 0 14,3315 57,8918 se0310745 fingalstorp * 10,7 0 14,3144 57,9202 se0310746 f glar djan * 5 0 14,396 57,8842 se0310747 tokeryd * 6,5 0 14,3671 57,9329 se0310801 morarps- och m rhulta mosse * 568,5 0 14,2517 57,5064 se0310802 trollamossen * 406,9 0 14,0206 57,5855 se0310804 k ttesj mossar ( stra) * 12,8 0 13,5998 57,5005 se0310805 brusa n 15 0 15,5715 57,6154 se0310806 l vtr dsmarker i j nk ping-huskvarna * 636,3 0 14,2485 57,7684 se0320002 rocknen-h sthultsskogen * 359,6 0 13,5233 56,8021 se0320014 centrala m ckeln * 875,6 0 14,1755 56,6661 se0320022 taglamyren * 386,5 0 14,4268 56,7236 se0320031 kr ketorpsskogen * 218,1 0 14,7904 57,2149 se0320040 v stra snen * 1 619,3 0 14,6681 56,6205 se0320046 sk rtaryd * 32,8 0 15,0342 56,9711 se0320055 v raskruv * 75,4 0 15,4506 57,0299 se0320063 k rng lsomr det * 129,7 0 15,4558 56,9792 se0320072 korr * 38,2 0 15,198 56,617 se0320078 engaholm * 7,3 0 14,5694 56,8764 se0320079 toftaholm * 81,2 0 14,0203 57,033 se0320101 stra snen * 1 867,3 0 14,7864 56,6408 se0320102 l ng * 59,5 0 14,6863 56,5401 se0320103 storasj omr det * 1 036,1 0 15,2736 56,9286 se0320104 osaby * 353,7 0 14,766 56,7712 se0320105 rshultsmyren * 1 499,5 0 13,4177 56,7675 se0320106 bokhultet * 344,5 0 14,7839 56,8619 se0320107 husebymaden * 130,4 0 14,5882 56,7681 se0320109 siggaboda * 71,6 0 14,5541 56,4549 se0320110 kronan * 9,1 0 14,1551 56,6104 se0320111 byv rma * 40 0 14,1309 56,6767 se0320112 m laskogsberg * 61,3 0 14,2524 56,8285 se0320113 g lsj myren * 343,9 0 14,0682 56,7815 se0320114 flattinge sar * 56,4 0 14,086 56,9812 se0320115 f rjans -l ng * 420,1 0 14,0062 57,0329 se0320117 flymossen * 454,2 0 13,7302 56,7387 se0320118 lidhults sen * 67,5 0 13,4385 56,8152 se0320119 stora hensj n * 196,4 0 15,0784 56,4835 se0320121 fagraholms fly * 81,6 0 15,2362 57,1138 se0320122 libbhults ngar * 71,5 0 15,099 57,146 se0320123 svartebro * 31,5 0 13,6379 56,7826 se0320124 l vsj ngar * 18,3 0 15,4679 56,836 se0320127 sj s s ng * 19,3 0 15,0617 57,0671 se0320128 j ttaberget 36,7 0 13,5397 56,8753 se0320130 norrn s udde 11,8 0 13,6484 56,8141 se0320131 ushult 5,2 0 13,5299 56,8888 se0320132 hiss 2,5 0 14,8036 56,9476 se0320133 helg 7,3 0 14,7618 56,9527 se0320134 asa * 11,1 0 14,8256 57,1898 se0320135 lunnabacken 3,9 0 14,7902 56,5854 se0320136 vitthults urskog * 16,4 0 15,2692 57,0615 se0320137 t ngsj fly * 69,3 0 15,2746 57,0785 se0320138 tiafly * 31,2 0 15,4816 56,8248 se0320139 agn s * 258 0 14,6352 56,6769 se0320140 brotorpab ck * 51,3 0 14,347 57,0268 se0320141 fiolenomr det * 498,2 0 14,5441 57,1047 se0320142 skilsn s * 49,3 0 14,0902 57,0385 se0320143 prostek p * 12 0 13,3835 56,8224 se0320144 ronamossen/klockesj myren * 384,8 0 13,8107 56,8362 se0320146 toftaholms alk rr * 3,3 0 14,0186 57,0146 se0320147 malmaryd 6,1 0 13,7007 56,6639 se0320148 stackarp 1,7 0 13,6327 56,7266 se0320149 s nnahult * 2,7 0 14,796 56,5922 se0320150 g ddeviks s 2,9 0 14,8523 56,3723 se0320151 soldatmossen * 48,4 0 15,1488 57,0562 se0320152 stojby * 8,2 0 14,8314 56,9524 se0320153 vasatorp * 7,4 0 14,932 57,0729 se0320154 notteryd * 257,7 0 14,8845 56,9179 se0320155 kruseb ke 2,2 0 14,0451 56,5003 se0320156 vak myr * 968,1 0 14,2411 56,5109 se0320157 linn s r shult * 54 0 14,198 56,612 se0320158 kulla-sk rg l * 21,8 0 15,3851 56,8598 se0320159 lunden * 11,2 0 14,9509 57,0807 se0320160 pettersborg * 2,1 0 15,187 56,6334 se0320161 dammarskulla 0,84 0 15,0542 56,5256 se0320162 bro * 5,4 0 15,208 56,5835 se0320163 t rnabygd * 3,4 0 14,7309 56,5661 se0320164 hackekvarn 0,62 0 14,7553 56,5396 se0320165 stora sk s * 15,5 0 15,056 57,1724 se0320166 hj lmaryd * 9,2 0 14,7261 57,1567 se0320167 h geryd * 6,1 0 14,7058 56,9542 se0320168 yxnan s * 6,7 0 14,7355 57,0877 se0320169 lidhem 12,6 0 14,8733 56,673 se0320170 bjursj * 3,8 0 14,655 57,1267 se0320171 br t * 3,7 0 14,6725 57,1264 se0320172 vitabr ten * 8,7 0 14,6695 57,1507 se0320173 s der ng * 6,3 0 13,8903 56,7669 se0320174 k nna * 2,1 0 13,9018 56,7781 se0320175 vashult * 4,7 0 14,1441 56,9914 se0320176 karlslund 0,53 0 14,042 56,8107 se0320177 tykatorp * 4,7 0 14,152 56,9689 se0320178 v rpeshult * 1,9 0 14,3698 56,726 se0320179 strand ngar vid garanshultasj n * 30 0 14,3378 56,6525 se0320180 strand ngar vid helge 14,4 0 13,9067 56,5036 se0320181 sk paryd 5,1 0 13,8916 56,4546 se0320182 varshult * 10,5 0 15,4268 57,0824 se0320183 hohult * 21,4 0 15,668 56,9785 se0320184 suletorp * 7,9 0 15,6672 56,9876 se0320185 ryd * 3,2 0 15,6733 56,9909 se0320186 lundby * 8,2 0 15,6566 56,9902 se0320187 botillabo * 8 0 15,6895 56,991 se0320188 ly sa-spekelid * 69,9 0 14,3748 57,1314 se0320189 hakatorp * 29,1 0 14,4572 57,0072 se0320190 humlaryd 0,76 0 14,6163 56,9228 se0320191 t rnings 12,3 0 14,5823 56,7502 se0320193 strand ng vid skatel vsfjorden 12,3 0 14,5876 56,7228 se0320194 lilla heda 0,78 0 15,112 57,1272 se0320195 torne 7,9 0 14,6005 56,6945 se0320196 karryd * 12,7 0 15,0921 57,1409 se0320197 dihult * 20,5 0 14,2234 56,6461 se0320198 skog vid tofta n * 80,9 0 14,0644 57,028 se0320199 brorsm la * 10,6 0 14,727 56,4737 se0320200 m sj hult * 29,2 0 15,5473 57,1445 se0320201 g sshult * 14,1 0 14,1568 56,9781 se0320203 rosenholm * 13,5 0 15,2184 57,1322 se0320204 t get 1,9 0 14,7362 56,5747 se0320205 g rdsby och hemmesj b keskog * 46,2 0 14,9207 56,8923 se0320206 yxkullsund * 121,9 0 14,146 57,0029 se0320207 alm s * 6,8 0 14,1508 56,5127 se0320208 alk rr i g ddeviks s * 5,1 0 14,8768 56,3962 se0320209 alk rr i g sshult * 4,8 0 14,1752 56,9839 se0320210 singelstorps fly * 197,1 0 15,326 56,9928 se0320211 horsn samossen * 569,2 0 14,0867 56,8104 se0320212 torpa * 4,9 0 13,59 56,7106 se0320213 sk raskog * 21 0 15,3514 57,0572 se0320214 sumpskog i sandreda * 1,4 0 15,1248 57,1207 se0320215 idebo s * 5,3 0 15,6764 57,0404 se0320216 rams s * 27 0 14,2119 56,7018 se0320217 alsumpskogar i gynkelstorp * 9,4 0 14,7442 57,0957 se0320218 m ketorp * 7,1 0 15,5624 57,1443 se0320219 uran s * 11,5 0 15,6178 57,1206 se0320220 hunshult * 109 0 14,6923 56,6407 se0320221 shuvud * 181,8 0 14,2014 56,6892 se0320222 ulvsb ck 12 0 13,5798 56,48 se0320223 t ngarne * 40,6 0 14,1978 56,6455 se0320224 ved sa * 370,4 0 14,1537 56,7125 se0320225 luberydsmossen * 120,8 0 13,6436 56,7406 se0320226 pr st ngen * 3 0 14,1859 56,6139 se0320227 r nn ( stra) * 442,1 0 13,4135 56,6104 se0320228 lunnarna * 1 064,3 0 13,3548 56,7583 se0320229 ljungsj myren * 264,3 0 13,3886 56,6967 se0320230 bockaskruv * 197,5 0 15,7296 56,9487 se0320231 stocksmyr * 658,8 0 15,3036 56,8396 se0330021 gills ttra * 90,8 0 16,5928 56,7037 se0330022 r nnerum-abbantorp * 523,4 0 16,6176 56,7538 se0330023 karum * 316 0 16,644 56,7828 se0330024 halltorp * 199,8 0 16,5747 56,8004 se0330032 rarevet * 164 0 16,1283 56,4461 se0330034 grytsj n * 141,1 0 16,0986 56,9254 se0330035 vackersl t * 67,8 0 16,0394 56,9319 se0330036 allgunnen * 2 260,9 0 16,0177 56,9922 se0330038 getebro * 242,7 0 16,1613 57,0078 se0330045 krokshult * 70 0 16,0816 57,3826 se0330046 malghult * 21,7 0 16,2447 57,3934 se0330048 s llevads n ( stra) * 176,2 0 15,6213 57,4619 se0330049 misterhult * 8 494,9 0 16,7324 57,5289 se0330050 norra kvill * 109,7 0 15,5936 57,7637 se0330051 lhults urskog * 29,1 0 16,1277 57,8338 se0330052 slad - skesk r * 2 001,1 0 16,7724 57,7945 se0330059 petg rde tr sk * 111,6 0 16,858 56,9545 se0330060 djurstadtr sk * 87,1 0 16,8588 56,9672 se0330062 knisa mosse * 139,1 0 16,8431 57,0511 se0330063 horns kungsg rd * 946 0 16,9323 57,193 se0330068 lind * 131,7 0 16,4392 56,7921 se0330084 s dviken * 2019 0 16,9485 57,033 se0330099 bj rn * 121,5 0 16,3623 56,7683 se0330100 em * 38,9 0 16,4959 57,1301 se0330101 b da pr stg rd * 25,2 0 17,0632 57,2463 se0330104 skede s * 28,2 0 16,7678 56,8426 se0330105 flasg lerum * 338,7 0 16,0964 57,0189 se0330106 stor * 452,2 0 16,4876 57,1886 se0330107 gr nudde * 101,8 0 16,0411 57,4825 se0330112 holmetorp * 27,3 0 16,5568 56,694 se0330114 v stra ng * 14,9 0 16,6582 56,7977 se0330115 kar s * 53,3 0 16,6349 56,7894 se0330116 borga hage * 107,5 0 16,6389 56,8728 se0330117 s dra greda l v ng * 2,8 0 16,8776 56,994 se0330118 lilla horns l v ng * 6,9 0 16,9118 57,0866 se0330119 b dakustens v stra * 741,4 0 16,9619 57,2543 se0330120 b da backar * 154,5 0 17,0301 57,2697 se0330121 b dakustens stra * 1 020,6 0 17,116 57,3146 se0330122 trollskogen * 265,8 0 17,1206 57,3517 se0330123 v rnan s sk rg rd * 1 551,9 0 16,172 56,4771 se0330124 huvudhultakvarn * 32,2 0 15,5281 56,7107 se0330125 bokhultet vid alster n * 14 0 16,1398 57,0336 se0330126 v ll * 2 748,6 0 16,5921 57,1143 se0330127 virbo med ek * 584,4 0 16,5797 57,3342 se0330128 ngmossen * 69,4 0 16,3242 57,4953 se0330130 bj rnn set * 89,7 0 15,7267 57,4625 se0330131 segersg rde * 552,6 0 16,5267 57,8452 se0330132 kvarntorpet * 149 0 16,5267 57,8591 se0330141 isg rde * 9,6 0 16,551 56,7368 se0330142 dyestad 6,2 0 16,6657 56,7188 se0330143 st rlinge sj marker * 218,6 0 16,7828 56,8006 se0330144 tjusby sj marker * 60,6 0 16,7923 56,8082 se0330146 husvalla sj marker * 1 304,1 0 16,954 57,0002 se0330151 skeppers ng * 25,6 0 17,04 57,3102 se0330152 lindreservatet * 76 0 17,0383 57,3236 se0330153 sj storp * 51,5 0 17,0797 57,3278 se0330154 nabbelund * 110,1 0 17,0881 57,343 se0330155 danmarksv gen 6,3 0 16,1191 57,0302 se0330156 nya rumshorvav gen 2,4 0 16,1732 57,0387 se0330157 v rlebo 1,6 0 16,1988 57,0539 se0330158 hors -v rsn s * 471,5 0 16,3643 56,7298 se0330159 r sankor 1 076,7 0 16,8174 57,5944 se0330160 em ns vattensystem i kalmar l n * 1 986,8 0 16,3721 57,1455 se0330161 stensryd * 30 0 15,7423 57,4665 se0330163 gr ns * 318,9 0 16,6932 57,7603 se0330164 r g (v sterviks sk rg rd) * 875 0 16,7219 57,8672 se0330165 idegransreservatet * 20,1 0 16,987 57,2505 se0330166 h gen s orde * 121,9 0 16,978 57,09 se0330167 vanserum-b ck- vetorp * 427,6 0 16,619 56,6871 se0330168 lidahult * 1,1 0 15,6164 56,6771 se0330169 h geruda-skinnsk lla * 48,5 0 15,547 57,3747 se0330170 ledeg l * 6,8 0 16,0738 56,992 se0330171 stenbergsmo * 6,3 0 15,9213 57,1718 se0330172 l v * 784,5 0 16,4744 56,9752 se0330175 jordtorps sen * 12 0 16,5556 56,676 se0330177 ryd * 61,3 0 16,5733 56,7222 se0330178 toresbo 2,9 0 15,798 56,6891 se0330179 bl jungfrun * 189,6 0 16,7935 57,252 se0330180 fur n * 96,3 0 16,6256 57,2816 se0330181 f rhagsberget * 52,2 0 16,2503 57,2495 se0330183 skrikebo * 20,1 0 16,3904 57,3523 se0330185 str mby * 107,7 0 15,9257 56,4857 se0330186 bj rk * 979,4 0 16,6488 57,8604 se0330187 jutsk r * 354,6 0 16,7987 57,845 se0330189 stora grind * 779,6 0 16,8199 57,8969 se0330190 st dsholmen * 1261 0 16,8189 57,8625 se0330191 tr ss * 69,2 0 16,7953 57,9473 se0330192 forsby * 114,8 0 16,5514 58,0577 se0330193 hultserum * 44,3 0 16,1999 57,7355 se0330194 ismanstorp * 87,8 0 16,6571 56,7537 se0330195 bj rnsbodar 12,3 0 16,7423 56,9369 se0330196 h gby hamn * 86,9 0 17,0399 57,1649 se0330197 svartviksk rret * 3,9 0 17,0464 57,264 se0330198 gillsby mosse * 90,8 0 16,8166 56,9686 se0330199 hagelstad * 5,8 0 16,934 57,1189 se0330200 h gby kyrkoreservat * 14,8 0 17,0188 57,1591 se0330201 jordhamn-gillberga * 322,4 0 16,902 57,1025 se0330202 sandvik * 11,6 0 16,8468 57,066 se0330203 slottsalvaret * 196,4 0 16,6427 56,8612 se0330204 stora mossens biotopskyddsomr de * 4,2 0 17,0055 57,2835 se0330205 strandskogen * 158,2 0 16,5864 56,8137 se0330206 strandtorp * 131,2 0 16,6131 56,8469 se0330208 tomeshultag len * 57,9 0 15,4059 56,7449 se0330210 vir ns vattensystem * 2 235,1 0 16,0894 57,4218 se0330211 ryngen 270,9 0 15,921 57,2524 se0330212 g lek rret och r dg lemossen * 15,6 0 16,0789 57,1854 se0330213 g shults biotopskyddsomr de * 2,9 0 15,6913 57,1892 se0330214 bottorpskusten * 71,7 0 16,2205 56,5969 se0330215 stackmossens biotopskyddsomr de * 4,9 0 15,9344 56,5955 se0330216 korsg rdens biotopskyddsomr den * 13,1 0 16,4444 56,7718 se0330217 v rnan s * 36,3 0 16,1423 56,4786 se0330218 alster ns vattensystem * 2 105,9 0 16,0481 57,0515 se0330221 h nstorp * 59,6 0 16,5539 56,6572 se0330226 appleryd * 1,8 0 15,9098 56,8421 se0330228 gr stensmon * 101,3 0 15,5384 56,9158 se0330229 h gelycke gammelskog * 1,5 0 15,6699 56,8972 se0330230 jonsbo fly * 24,7 0 15,8379 57,0538 se0330231 smedjevik * 211,5 0 15,8698 56,8878 se0330232 ljungby n 56,8 0 16,0414 56,7692 se0330233 br bygden * 528,4 0 16,1618 57,3342 se0330234 hammarsebo brandf lt * 65,7 0 16,1715 57,2346 se0330235 v stra ramnebo biotopskyddsomr de * 5,2 0 16,4654 57,5107 se0330237 lvedals biotopskyddsomr de * 2,5 0 16,4698 57,4635 se0330238 sj k rr 33,7 0 16,3347 57,3811 se0330239 stora ramm och marstr mmen 326,9 0 16,4798 57,5257 se0330240 degerhyltan * 7,4 0 15,846 56,4764 se0330241 ekelunda 0,79 0 16,0494 56,418 se0330242 djursdalabygden * 79,1 0 15,8463 57,7757 se0330243 gn st * 5,7 0 15,4482 57,7068 se0330244 gr nsved 1 0 15,5225 57,7256 se0330245 v ggeberg * 12,7 0 15,5205 57,6648 se0330246 rs sa * 17,4 0 15,6979 57,8232 se0330247 djursn s kase * 20 0 16,5419 57,981 se0330248 ekhultebergens naturreservat (kalmar l n) * 20,4 0 16,2484 58,1357 se0330249 f lgaren 258,4 0 16,3893 57,7534 se0330250 malmmossen * 15,9 0 16,198 57,6879 se0330251 norrhults biotopskyddsomr den * 6,2 0 16,2916 57,6911 se0330252 stor ns biotopskyddsomr de 2,4 0 16,2264 58,0674 se0330253 s dra malm * 1 804,6 0 16,7213 57,789 se0330254 t rnsfall * 37,3 0 16,4825 57,8042 se0330255 ukna-botorps biotopskyddsomr de 1,8 0 16,2336 58,0752 se0330256 ukna-melby biotopskyddsomr de 4,9 0 16,2452 58,0717 se0330258 v rum * 37,9 0 16,1329 58,0331 se0330259 yxnevik 40,9 0 16,5948 57,6571 se0330260 restad-h llebergs biotopskyddsomr de * 5,9 0 16,4889 58,0167 se0330261 mt holms biotopskyddsomr de 2,9 0 16,2165 57,9836 se0330262 humlen s 75,7 0 16,2619 57,3593 se0330263 str msrum * 75,8 0 16,4884 56,9412 se0330264 kerby-runstens sj marker * 1 118,9 0 16,7428 56,6812 se0330265 kapelludden * 498,2 0 16,8452 56,8207 se0330266 egby sj marker * 983,4 0 16,8728 56,8696 se0330267 vin s * 94,9 0 16,4298 58,0482 se0330268 figeholm * 154,8 0 16,5397 57,3854 se0330270 krask gle * 47,1 0 15,7845 57,2831 se0330272 leklintabrottet * 23 0 16,7749 56,9816 se0330308 hoburgs bank och midsj bankarna 1 051 111,3 0 17,6138 56,1377 se0340004 vaktbackar * 15,3 0 18,1616 56,9361 se0340010 n srevet * 95 0 18,1721 57,066 se0340016 hummelbosholm * 233,7 0 18,5624 57,1975 se0340017 n rsholmen * 415 0 18,6895 57,2269 se0340018 ugnen * 311,1 0 18,1317 57,2439 se0340021 laus holmar * 527,8 0 18,7498 57,2858 se0340023 stora karls * 1 176,8 0 17,9723 57,2856 se0340025 lilla karls * 936,7 0 18,063 57,3127 se0340026 bosarve i lye * 2,4 0 18,5527 57,3033 se0340027 k ld nge * 5,6 0 18,6088 57,3141 se0340031 mallg rds k llmyr * 6,7 0 18,2883 57,3239 se0340033 botes k llmyr * 177,3 0 18,3214 57,3463 se0340035 hajdes storhage * 198,3 0 18,2972 57,3525 se0340038 danbo * 57,3 0 18,8142 57,3784 se0340040 torsburgen * 158,5 0 18,7188 57,4116 se0340045 uppstaig * 186,3 0 18,7921 57,4359 se0340049 paviken * 75,9 0 18,1425 57,4561 se0340057 storsund * 137,6 0 18,78 57,5655 se0340058 h rsne pr st ng * 9,7 0 18,6081 57,5675 se0340059 allekvia l v ng * 11,2 0 18,4302 57,6092 se0340060 alvena lindar ng * 5,7 0 18,6471 57,6099 se0340064 brucebo * 33,9 0 18,3481 57,6861 se0340066 tiselhagen * 12,3 0 18,6635 57,7146 se0340072 millumtr sk * 23,4 0 18,6146 57,776 se0340073 furilden * 62,9 0 19,0194 57,7827 se0340076 bj rkume * 239,6 0 18,4576 57,7987 se0340082 hoburgsmyr * 169,6 0 18,8484 57,8221 se0340083 grausne k llmyr * 18,7 0 18,5334 57,8262 se0340084 tr skmyr * 286,9 0 18,7535 57,8298 se0340087 vit rtsk llan * 13,7 0 18,8136 57,8519 se0340090 hall-hangvar * 2385 0 18,661 57,8787 se0340092 ullahau * 143,5 0 19,2518 57,9641 se0340093 skalahauar 29,1 0 19,3296 57,9592 se0340094 langhammars * 478,7 0 19,1667 57,9832 se0340096 norsholmen * 137,2 0 19,2255 57,992 se0340097 gotska sand n-salvorev * 60 494,7 0 19,2572 58,2724 se0340098 gr tlingboudd-ytterholmen * 535 0 18,4818 57,1258 se0340099 faludden * 227 0 18,3863 57,0013 se0340100 v stergarns utholme * 50,4 0 18,092 57,4342 se0340101 muskmyr * 102,1 0 18,1974 56,9374 se0340102 haugajnar * 157,4 0 18,1974 57,1915 se0340103 kallgatburg * 115 0 18,6807 57,6943 se0340104 yttre stockviken * 119,9 0 18,3558 56,9891 se0340105 s dra gr tlingboudd * 115,6 0 18,4213 57,1109 se0340106 sigdesholm * 29,5 0 18,4656 57,1556 se0340107 klinthagen * 177,4 0 18,6169 57,8414 se0340108 blautmyrskogen * 323,2 0 18,7478 57,909 se0340109 krakv t * 16,4 0 18,181 57,1559 se0340110 s vv t * 21,4 0 18,1872 57,1604 se0340111 filehajdar * 64,6 0 18,6742 57,7177 se0340112 verkegards * 27,7 0 19,1029 57,9025 se0340113 mojner * 25,4 0 18,7921 57,6618 se0340114 larve * 175,3 0 18,4834 57,1643 se0340115 stergarnsberget * 31,9 0 18,8566 57,4181 se0340116 h ssle klint * 21,6 0 18,9105 57,4188 se0340117 lb ck * 22,4 0 18,373 57,6192 se0340118 bojsv tar * 87,2 0 18,7235 57,6882 se0340119 storholmen i fardumetr sk * 14,7 0 18,9189 57,788 se0340120 b stetr sk * 6 540,5 0 18,9435 57,8821 se0340121 heligholmen * 11,8 0 18,2838 56,9238 se0340122 v stlands * 40,1 0 18,2114 57,0134 se0340123 ollajvs * 116,8 0 18,6743 57,3277 se0340124 lindhammarsmyr * 190,3 0 18,5321 57,4158 se0340125 h gklint * 12,1 0 18,1971 57,597 se0340126 bergbetningen * 6,4 0 18,3261 57,663 se0340127 skenholmen * 256,4 0 19,0431 57,7967 se0340128 anga pr st nge * 2 0 18,7086 57,4769 se0340129 fide pr st nge * 26,6 0 18,3062 57,0843 se0340130 hejnum h g rd * 5,5 0 18,6287 57,6938 se0340131 herrg rdsklint * 145,6 0 18,739 57,4026 se0340133 mullvalds strandskog * 21,2 0 18,7596 57,3662 se0340134 m sterby nget * 16,6 0 18,2914 57,4624 se0340135 pankar * 15,5 0 18,3778 57,1333 se0340136 salmb rshagen * 31,4 0 18,5609 57,8045 se0340137 svinmyr * 16,9 0 18,6992 57,39 se0340138 stergarns pr st nge * 8,7 0 18,8613 57,4218 se0340140 dagghagen * 149,1 0 18,8573 57,7497 se0340141 grodv t * 23,9 0 18,6492 57,723 se0340142 russv tar * 117,3 0 18,7357 57,3889 se0340143 mallg rds haid * 166,3 0 18,611 57,3779 se0340146 gr ne * 39,1 0 18,5885 57,796 se0340147 hejnum kallgate * 920,8 0 18,693 57,6823 se0340148 m lnermyr * 580,6 0 18,8789 57,8348 se0340149 gannarveviken * 36,9 0 18,18 57,3454 se0340150 brunnsrar * 16 0 18,5303 57,3609 se0340151 forsviden * 198 0 18,6964 57,7675 se0340152 grogarnsberget * 232,7 0 18,8924 57,4313 se0340153 marpestr sk * 151,2 0 19,0821 57,9302 se0340154 asunden * 162 0 18,8477 57,7083 se0340155 ryssn s * 212,9 0 19,1175 57,8523 se0340156 liste-hammars * 9,1 0 18,764 57,5222 se0340157 kvie * 26,5 0 18,3753 57,3314 se0340158 bungen s * 55,9 0 19,0876 57,8349 se0340159 nyg rdsmyr * 41,7 0 18,6825 57,4467 se0340160 h gsarve k rr ng 2,9 0 18,1916 57,1651 se0340161 austerrum * 349,7 0 18,3426 57,0518 se0340162 flisviken * 198,9 0 18,1687 56,9121 se0340163 n sudden * 51,4 0 18,2354 57,0678 se0340164 sandviken * 23,5 0 18,8722 57,3979 se0340165 kronholmen * 6,1 0 18,1291 57,4509 se0340166 pavals * 21,5 0 18,6856 57,2468 se0340167 lausvik * 129,6 0 18,6718 57,2859 se0340168 sm g rde naturskog * 6,4 0 18,129 57,4934 se0340169 austre * 13,4 0 18,3006 56,9401 se0340170 petesvik * 62,4 0 18,1585 57,1752 se0340171 husrygg * 38,4 0 18,1561 56,9454 se0340172 kloster nge 25,7 0 18,4889 57,4982 se0340173 h sselby * 6,8 0 18,3651 57,318 se0340174 backhagen * 2,6 0 18,3531 57,3201 se0340175 nyhagen * 1 0 18,315 57,3146 se0340176 lingsvidar 7,3 0 18,3246 57,3203 se0340177 h llskog 3,2 0 18,3142 57,3185 se0340178 niksarve 6,6 0 18,3426 57,316 se0340179 bopparve 1,6 0 18,1639 57,2974 se0340180 myrungs 2,3 0 18,4071 57,2752 se0340181 tomsarve * 2,9 0 18,1069 57,2883 se0340182 roleks * 9,2 0 18,3374 57,5379 se0340183 ogges nge 7 0 18,422 57,2078 se0340184 fride * 7,5 0 18,4119 57,3312 se0340185 juvesv t * 9,9 0 18,5886 57,3523 se0340190 hejdeby h llar * 15,8 0 18,3852 57,636 se0340191 nasume myr * 93,4 0 18,1428 57,5388 se0340192 nordermorar 185 0 19,3201 57,9703 se0340193 suderbys blekev t * 6,5 0 18,6784 57,8107 se0340194 lilla hajdes v t * 0,92 0 18,309 57,3377 se0340195 bruten * 29,8 0 18,7969 57,7468 se0340196 stenstugu skog * 57,3 0 18,7596 57,4555 se0340197 jusarve skog * 38,3 0 18,6991 57,577 se0340198 hajdhagen * 127,3 0 18,6312 57,826 se0340199 sajgs * 91,3 0 18,8971 57,7255 se0340200 sigfride * 130,9 0 18,9536 57,8309 se0340201 suderbys h llar * 16,8 0 18,3685 57,6309 se0340202 kyllajhajdar * 130,4 0 18,9352 57,7556 se0340203 ormh llar-bromyr * 325,6 0 18,5723 57,8202 se0340204 p rkhagen * 105,8 0 18,7004 57,8717 se0340205 stora vikers * 281 0 18,8396 57,8474 se0340206 stadshagen * 25,2 0 18,3521 57,6197 se0340207 sl ttflis * 33,6 0 18,3105 57,6043 se0340208 t rrvesklint * 37,3 0 18,477 57,8234 se0340209 jungfrun * 11,7 0 18,5026 57,8291 se0410018 hj rtsj m la * 161,9 0 14,9722 56,3362 se0410024 johannishus sar * 59,4 0 15,4291 56,2212 se0410054 mma 61,1 0 14,6589 56,3963 se0410075 k ringahejan * 122,1 0 14,6952 56,35 se0410078 ire * 99,1 0 14,8798 56,353 se0410079 persg rde * 59,5 0 14,9723 56,2653 se0410080 kvall kra * 59,3 0 14,956 56,2646 se0410083 tolseboda 14,4 0 15,3453 56,3366 se0410084 vantakalleberget-gr ng lsm la * 115,1 0 15,3617 56,3425 se0410085 s nneshult * 149 0 15,3548 56,3172 se0410086 storemosse * 139,4 0 15,3447 56,3013 se0410094 sk rva * 234,4 0 15,5736 56,2022 se0410112 h gasand 26,8 0 16,0219 56,2732 se0410113 isaks kl pp * 124,7 0 15,9761 56,1968 se0410116 bj rkeryd * 13,7 0 15,0815 56,2848 se0410117 lillag rde * 13,6 0 15,1054 56,2728 se0410118 tallet * 16,4 0 15,3835 56,2344 se0410119 skurem la * 33,2 0 15,3532 56,2568 se0410122 grimsm la 10,3 0 14,8705 56,3191 se0410128 m rrums n * 171,2 0 14,7364 56,2634 se0410129 lyckeby ekebacke * 13,4 0 15,6507 56,2021 se0410132 v rmansn s * 2,7 0 15,3792 56,2915 se0410139 kullan * 29,3 0 14,4847 56,3419 se0410141 husg l 3,3 0 15,5853 56,4264 se0410142 br tabron * 4 0 15,1997 56,3396 se0410162 sn fleboda * 6 0 14,5337 56,3238 se0410164 h rn s * 37,3 0 14,7164 56,3286 se0410165 sl nsm la * 2,6 0 14,7416 56,3464 se0410166 ringam la 42,5 0 14,8406 56,345 se0410167 loberget * 128,5 0 14,849 56,3524 se0410168 br kne n * 80 0 15,0705 56,3127 se0410169 h lab ck * 29,1 0 15,0739 56,3541 se0410170 rseryd * 26,4 0 15,075 56,3274 se0410177 j msunda * 11,1 0 15,4741 56,277 se0410178 m starem la * 4,4 0 15,6622 56,3414 se0410179 lmteryd * 9,2 0 15,7621 56,2732 se0410180 brom la * 7,4 0 15,7208 56,3033 se0410191 mulatorp * 57,9 0 14,4859 56,4162 se0410192 br nnarebygden * 11,5 0 14,5255 56,3783 se0410197 b kem la * 53,9 0 14,9881 56,3646 se0410198 tattam la * 70,1 0 14,9914 56,2823 se0410199 gatmyren * 12 0 15,0972 56,3668 se0410200 gummag lsm la * 22,2 0 15,013 56,4069 se0410201 horsasj n 50,3 0 15,2747 56,3554 se0410202 skarup 11,9 0 15,2326 56,2614 se0410203 r vsm la 4,7 0 15,1429 56,4365 se0410204 aspholmarna * 0,97 0 15,3778 56,3196 se0410213 marielund * 17,8 0 15,5372 56,2142 se0410214 skallahults sen * 5,3 0 15,512 56,2426 se0410215 silletorps n 1,9 0 15,6184 56,2232 se0410216 s dra stensj * 23,4 0 15,551 56,3648 se0410217 v rmasj ns utlopp * 1,5 0 15,6727 56,2885 se0410218 lyckeby ns dalg ng * 11,7 0 15,6743 56,2204 se0410219 kummeln * 18,4 0 15,6753 56,2028 se0410226 valludden * 5,6 0 16,0454 56,2512 se0410227 lommaflyet * 36,6 0 15,6315 56,4167 se0410228 s dra flymen * 50,5 0 15,7701 56,326 se0410235 alnaryd v stra 23,8 0 15,4229 56,3546 se0410236 alnaryd stra 22,9 0 15,4322 56,3571 se0410237 ang lsm la * 6,1 0 14,6847 56,3425 se0410238 bl berget * 13,2 0 15,1766 56,2601 se0410239 broddam la * 6,1 0 15,3508 56,4645 se0410240 b rabygd * 0,57 0 15,074 56,2987 se0410241 falsehultsmyren * 5,4 0 14,5322 56,4272 se0410242 granem la * 11,9 0 15,723 56,3862 se0410243 gr ng lsm la * 1 0 15,3554 56,3652 se0410244 hagatorpet * 2,6 0 15,7391 56,3585 se0410245 hasselstad * 1,1 0 15,221 56,2864 se0410247 kallg rdsm la * 1,9 0 15,7152 56,3794 se0410248 kallg rdsm la s dra * 1,8 0 15,7248 56,367 se0410249 kopparholm 0,85 0 15,6842 56,4086 se0410250 krogsm la-falan * 4,5 0 15,658 56,3575 se0410252 n ttleryd * 2 0 15,658 56,3022 se0410253 sand s * 1,3 0 15,7232 56,3989 se0410254 spetsam la * 6 0 15,5228 56,4553 se0410255 staggelid * 4 0 15,4022 56,349 se0410256 stora l nnem la * 0,41 0 15,3759 56,3864 se0410257 stora silpinge 0,33 0 15,1808 56,2746 se0410258 st lalyckan * 1,2 0 15,6458 56,3525 se0410260 totasj * 9,8 0 15,4647 56,4523 se0410261 lmtam la * 0,72 0 15,539 56,4817 se0410262 jasj m la * 1,5 0 15,0221 56,3203 se0410263 ljehult * 8,3 0 15,0503 56,4126 se0410264 stra kvall kra * 38,7 0 14,9625 56,267 se0420103 nytebodaskogen * 55,8 0 14,384 56,3309 se0420269 nedraryd * 23,1 0 14,2307 56,4149 se0420270 gr shult * 19,9 0 14,0662 56,4506 se0420278 v stermyr * 329,9 0 14,1853 56,4669 se0420279 vysslemyr * 321,6 0 14,1651 56,4464 se0420286 tyringemossen * 28,3 0 14,2229 56,4926 se0420299 skeingesj n 276,1 0 13,8936 56,3683 se0510011 g storps skog * 158,9 0 13,1793 56,607 se0510014 m stocka ljunghed * 71,5 0 13,2403 56,6121 se0510021 kl vaberget * 82 0 13,1341 56,7318 se0510023 porsbj r * 541,6 0 13,3072 56,7599 se0510025 svarta klippan 16,1 0 13,2109 56,7831 se0510028 virsehatt * 15,4 0 13,0189 56,7968 se0510029 mog lsmyren * 32,6 0 13,2968 56,8291 se0510030 skrockeberg * 51,2 0 12,9923 56,8653 se0510033 skubbhult * 22,3 0 13,3407 56,9299 se0510034 deg rdet * 24,9 0 13,5308 56,9663 se0510036 lintalund 11,7 0 13,1668 56,9754 se0510044 bergs naturskog * 139,3 0 12,7789 57,0683 se0510045 yttra berg * 59,9 0 12,8074 57,0838 se0510046 sumpafallen * 49,8 0 12,6602 57,0951 se0510047 fegen-halland * 897 0 13,0683 57,1298 se0510063 g ddevik * 37,3 0 12,2396 57,4449 se0510071 m r s 45 0 13,2329 57,0383 se0510072 tira ar * 732,2 0 13,6757 56,9443 se0510089 s der ngarna * 78 0 13,1779 56,6819 se0510090 g rdshult * 102,4 0 13,1425 56,6947 se0510092 bl alt * 92,6 0 13,2257 56,5786 se0510093 r nn (v stra) * 303,2 0 13,3959 56,5945 se0510095 store mosse-f rg n * 144,7 0 13,3417 57,0059 se0510101 biskopstorp * 758 0 12,8865 56,7952 se0510105 r geta sen * 13 0 13,1009 56,8552 se0510106 sundsholm * 64,7 0 13,181 56,7465 se0510107 hyltan * 14,6 0 13,1241 56,652 se0510108 kvarnaberget 6,8 0 13,1099 56,6487 se0510111 myskebackarna * 39,6 0 12,8236 56,895 se0510112 k ttebo * 25,3 0 12,8445 56,9206 se0510114 oxhagen * 5,1 0 12,321 57,4839 se0510115 h gvads n 59,7 0 12,697 57,1106 se0510116 l nghultamyren * 770,7 0 13,2129 56,7278 se0510117 dullaberget * 19 0 13,3363 56,8923 se0510118 lunnamossen * 90,1 0 13,558 56,9679 se0510120 danska fall * 62,1 0 13,1326 56,7088 se0510121 svarten 141,1 0 12,6027 57,1561 se0510125 lmebj r 27 0 12,597 57,0977 se0510132 fylle n 268,6 0 13,1403 56,7291 se0510133 rossared * 359,5 0 12,1987 57,4802 se0510139 nabben * 27,4 0 12,5609 57,1102 se0510145 vadk rr * 5,8 0 12,39 57,2728 se0510146 frodebj r 3,1 0 12,8063 56,9261 se0510147 okome-boa 6,9 0 12,7735 57,0527 se0510149 lm s * 2,4 0 12,8413 56,9303 se0510150 lidhult * 1,6 0 13,0731 57,0504 se0510151 sk rshultaberg * 18,4 0 13,2923 57,0346 se0510152 almeberget * 68,7 0 12,8952 56,8522 se0510153 b gilt 3,4 0 13,1853 56,7953 se0510154 h stilt 10,9 0 13,2544 56,831 se0510155 r mebo 10,4 0 13,1117 56,7622 se0510156 stavsbj r 4,7 0 13,1917 56,7888 se0510161 moshult * 2,3 0 13,0716 56,8569 se0510163 vrab ke * 27,3 0 12,8915 56,9102 se0510164 bj rnaskog 6,6 0 13,4287 56,5496 se0510165 pr staskogen 8,3 0 13,3198 56,5316 se0510166 johansfors-nissastr m * 27,6 0 12,9948 56,8387 se0510170 t nnersj m let och m stocka skjutf lt * 2 974,5 0 13,2554 56,6723 se0510178 rinnamossen * 16 0 12,284 57,5559 se0510179 klintamossen * 74,5 0 12,8361 57,0509 se0510180 ullasj b cken * 105,8 0 13,0803 56,7574 se0510181 klo * 9,9 0 13,2644 56,9126 se0510182 kyrkobacka * 5,4 0 12,647 57,0913 se0510183 egnared 1,1 0 12,701 57,2079 se0510185 tran 225,4 0 12,6139 56,9584 se0520025 n verk rr * 234,6 0 11,3665 58,3475 se0520034 stigfjorden * 4 837,3 0 11,612 58,0875 se0520042 ramsvikslandet * 851,1 0 11,2435 58,416 se0520045 gullmarsberg * 36,8 0 11,6492 58,3748 se0520048 stenungsundskusten * 2 144,8 0 11,791 58,0134 se0520049 lyseg rden * 14,9 0 12,0241 57,9459 se0520057 malm fjord 699,2 0 11,3577 58,2867 se0520112 kollunger d vatten * 387,4 0 11,7546 58,1686 se0520115 store mosse * 25 0 11,9335 58,2749 se0520118 v gs ter bokskog 2,9 0 11,7845 58,4579 se0520119 bredmossen-hensbacka * 189,6 0 11,7521 58,4301 se0520121 bredmossen-dalen * 154,8 0 11,6243 58,6311 se0520126 tross -kalv -lind * 891 0 11,1517 58,7766 se0520129 bredmossarna-fiskl ssj n * 189,3 0 11,6066 58,7912 se0520133 koster * 1167 0 10,9995 58,9038 se0520141 kynnefj ll * 1 674,9 0 11,7223 58,7192 se0520145 klippan * 54 0 12,4829 57,6887 se0520146 bredfj llet * 505,5 0 12,0203 58,2128 se0520147 sann sfjorden 435,1 0 11,2248 58,7431 se0520148 str msvattnet 194,6 0 11,2441 58,9416 se0520149 ranebolund * 26 0 11,9466 57,9731 se0520150 tanumskusten * 8 274,1 0 11,2088 58,666 se0520154 klockaremossen * 530 0 11,9759 58,4337 se0520155 kragen s * 12,3 0 11,2463 58,8056 se0520156 l ngevalls lven * 15,6 0 11,5687 58,801 se0520157 maderna-haketj rn * 185,9 0 12,161 57,7137 se0520160 bokedalen * 99,6 0 12,1787 57,7545 se0520161 gustavsberg-korpberget * 50,1 0 11,9296 58,3276 se0520162 brattefors n * 45 0 11,9145 58,1987 se0520163 rekils lven * 120 0 11,6768 58,477 se0520164 frustugutj rnet 8,8 0 11,8979 58,6913 se0520165 kleva * 36 0 11,259 58,7151 se0520166 svartedalens naturskogar * 1 835,5 0 12,0289 58,0141 se0520167 l rje n * 127 0 12,0719 57,7912 se0520168 risbohult * 63,1 0 12,3933 57,6943 se0520169 labbera 22,3 0 12,0813 57,6625 se0520170 kosterfjorden-v der fjorden * 54016 0 11,0374 58,7652 se0520171 gullmarsfjorden 11395 0 11,445 58,2864 se0520172 idefjorden 880,5 0 11,3798 59,0621 se0520173 havstensfjorden-sv lte kile 1 259,3 0 11,7562 58,3263 se0520174 halsefjorden 1 211,7 0 11,7751 58,1153 se0520175 byfjorden * 1061 0 11,407 58,4051 se0520177 jorefjorden * 632,7 0 11,2692 58,5832 se0520178 tj stelsr dsb cken * 4,7 0 11,9279 58,2211 se0520179 kynne lv 71,5 0 11,6754 58,7913 se0520180 lyseg rden ( stra) * 18 0 12,0435 57,9474 se0520182 enningdals lven 4,5 0 11,5376 58,8819 se0520183 s ve n, nedre delen 34,1 0 12,0831 57,7363 se0520184 svenneby * 7,4 0 11,3134 58,5113 se0520185 tingvall 11 0 11,5698 58,7423 se0520186 mus n * 152,4 0 11,2445 58,6322 se0520187 tjurpannan * 271,4 0 11,1851 58,7224 se0520188 sotesk r 299,4 0 11,1827 58,4233 se0520189 bratten 120 878,4 0 10,4037 58,4159 se0530001 fegen 1621 0 13,1387 57,2033 se0530008 komosse (v stra) * 2833 0 13,6823 57,7109 se0530022 l rkemossen * 571,1 0 12,7289 58,0829 se0530028 hullsj n 268,8 0 12,3774 58,2788 se0530029 halle- och hunnebergs branter * 856,7 0 12,4529 58,3212 se0530030 jemossarna * 381,2 0 12,4626 58,3214 se0530039 ranneberget * 84,4 0 12,3849 58,7818 se0530041 tingvallamossen * 588,1 0 12,037 58,8539 se0530042 s rknatten * 370,1 0 12,4697 58,9077 se0530045 tresticklan-boksj n * 3 260,5 0 11,7527 59,0241 se0530050 br cke ngar * 62,1 0 12,4807 59,047 se0530052 balj sen * 297,3 0 12,4684 59,0789 se0530059 kolareb cken * 17,8 0 13,6883 57,8742 se0530070 n s ekhagar * 99,8 0 12,3857 57,8141 se0530072 hofsn s * 199,6 0 13,2949 57,6416 se0530073 risveden * 286,1 0 12,2892 57,9663 se0530075 nnarp 3,3 0 13,5771 57,8283 se0530076 h ssna pr stg rd * 61,5 0 13,5426 57,8198 se0530077 baktr gen * 21,8 0 13,5035 57,9252 se0530078 m larp och kr klingshage * 78,8 0 13,0202 57,808 se0530079 vikaryd * 4,9 0 12,4514 57,9562 se0530080 mollungen * 171,6 0 13,1304 57,9286 se0530081 kroppefj ll * 1 120,6 0 12,1725 58,652 se0530082 ryrs naturreservat * 102,8 0 12,4942 58,7996 se0530083 skarsdalen * 249,5 0 12,2226 59,0895 se0530085 s ve n * 65,8 0 12,3327 57,7968 se0530086 r lle * 8,1 0 13,1987 57,7036 se0530087 kn tte kullar 4,4 0 13,5537 57,8541 se0530088 fr lseg rden * 16,8 0 13,526 57,9774 se0530089 furustad * 157,5 0 11,8978 59,0859 se0530090 aspens station * 11,7 0 12,242 57,7526 se0530091 k rrbog rde * 3 0 12,4551 57,844 se0530092 backa * 4,1 0 13,0224 57,6098 se0530093 molla bokskog * 29,3 0 13,036 57,9154 se0530094 bast sen * 4,8 0 12,4794 58,9338 se0530095 g lsj n * 46,3 0 12,1183 58,6137 se0530096 norra b sane * 16,3 0 12,2984 58,77 se0530097 kycklingkullen 0,83 0 13,4512 57,8952 se0530098 m ngsholm * 38,8 0 12,7335 58,0088 se0530099 tranhult 2,4 0 12,7734 57,5934 se0530100 nolhagaviken * 52,2 0 12,5044 57,9375 se0530101 rammdalen * 29,6 0 12,3266 57,9649 se0530102 skeppshult 5,5 0 12,9633 57,2157 se0530103 skvalarn 2,8 0 12,0625 58,8725 se0530104 strand * 8 0 12,4404 59,092 se0530105 bryngelsg rde 4,8 0 12,5358 57,8073 se0530106 svarvaretorpet 17,4 0 12,3438 58,718 se0530109 kr keboberg * 23,6 0 13,3812 57,7884 se0530110 tattarstr mmarna * 10,3 0 12,9345 57,6162 se0530112 stad * 106,2 0 12,4132 57,9514 se0530113 norra v nersn s sk rg rd * 799,7 0 12,6459 58,4882 se0530114 h stefjordens strand ngar * 82,2 0 12,1906 58,4025 se0530115 sollums n * 21,9 0 12,1147 58,1876 se0530116 lunnebo * 261,6 0 12,2758 58,7867 se0530117 stommeb cken 7,7 0 12,2175 58,7508 se0530118 brattorps n * 47 0 12,0937 58,1651 se0530119 sju str mmar * 5,7 0 12,6777 57,3862 se0530121 h ggsj ryr * 6,9 0 12,2585 58,1238 se0530122 brunsered * 29 0 13,7141 57,8334 se0530123 ramhultafallet * 26,1 0 12,4001 57,5156 se0530124 sebo 3,2 0 12,9231 57,2166 se0530125 hag 6,6 0 13,1291 57,6554 se0530126 d ttern 3 735,1 0 12,601 58,39 se0530127 ijared * 91,5 0 12,3939 57,8398 se0530130 bokullen * 122,4 0 11,8642 59,0744 se0530131 g tebo * 5,5 0 12,1857 57,7492 se0530132 rapensk r * 40 0 12,2325 58,0229 se0530133 jemossen * 723,2 0 12,0569 58,777 se0530134 slerebo n * 49,6 0 12,2732 58,0076 se0530137 sk rbo * 65 0 12,3691 58,9799 se0530138 norane lven 1,8 0 11,6752 58,8974 se0530139 stoms s 33,6 0 12,5523 57,5472 se0530140 hors ckrasj n 3,8 0 13,4689 57,9021 se0530141 l ngelidstj rnet 9,1 0 12,0087 58,9688 se0530142 hagarne * 4,2 0 12,4978 58,8654 se0530144 ren s-tostekulla * 52,5 0 12,3726 57,4997 se0530145 valdalsbergen * 95,8 0 12,0901 58,217 se0530147 stebo 0,31 0 12,462 58,8072 se0530148 t nga hed 39,9 0 12,8269 58,0274 se0530149 risvedens agk rr * 7,5 0 12,3048 58,0097 se0530150 valdalssj n och hagens sm vatten * 3,9 0 12,1018 58,2125 se0530151 h gsbyn * 14,1 0 12,4101 58,8759 se0530152 lida * 1,2 0 12,8072 57,9004 se0530153 yxn s 16,4 0 12,6985 57,9485 se0530154 ngarna 0,61 0 12,4951 58,846 se0530155 lunden * 1,1 0 12,7066 57,3391 se0530156 grimsheden 1,3 0 12,4473 59,0031 se0530157 kabbo * 8,7 0 12,319 58,723 se0530159 vr n 0,15 0 12,6357 57,8699 se0530170 humla * 1,4 0 13,5289 57,961 se0530171 nordtorpet 0,08 0 13,5314 57,971 se0530172 halla 0,4 0 13,5319 57,7908 se0530173 nnarp, nordv st * 0,39 0 13,5493 57,8341 se0530174 h ssna kyrka, v st 0,06 0 13,5318 57,8245 se0530175 humla smedsg rden * 0,93 0 13,5161 57,9453 se0530176 ryninga 2 0 13,5586 58,005 se0530177 tittebo * 1,7 0 13,2069 57,4247 se0530178 knogrum * 1,2 0 13,626 57,6241 se0530179 gantar s 0,7 0 12,7184 57,8361 se0530180 holts ckra * 0,96 0 12,9422 57,9639 se0530181 liden * 4,6 0 12,4065 58,9564 se0530182 nockakulla * 2,4 0 12,7795 57,328 se0530183 skitne v ner * 1,1 0 12,0878 58,5492 se0530184 runns ter * 1,3 0 12,1922 58,7297 se0530185 huleg rde * 4 0 13,758 57,8873 se0530186 hulu 1,7 0 13,3001 57,7006 se0530191 snar satorp * 2,7 0 13,3724 57,4403 se0530192 valared 0,17 0 13,5419 57,7999 se0530193 vinsarpak rret * 3,7 0 13,5147 57,8914 se0530194 hallabo 1,3 0 13,4982 57,9315 se0530195 krutbr nnareg rden * 2,9 0 13,4469 57,8894 se0530196 dalums brinkar 4,1 0 13,4661 57,8962 se0530197 dalums kyrka, nord 0,35 0 13,4768 57,9 se0530198 mj lkudden 2,4 0 12,4451 58,8135 se0530199 vimmerstad 0,39 0 13,4829 57,9134 se0530200 n re 0,55 0 13,4422 57,8851 se0530201 borgelemossarna * 593 0 11,8259 58,9455 se0530202 h llan 0,19 0 12,3365 58,7172 se0530203 kingebol * 1,3 0 12,5254 58,9177 se0530204 salebol * 1,8 0 12,4976 58,8749 se0530205 abborr s 4 0 12,8767 57,556 se0530206 amma- och h stamossarna * 1 093,9 0 13,1 57,2841 se0530207 k ttesj mossar * 437,7 0 13,583 57,5184 se0530208 orraholmen * 5,1 0 13,0664 58,0738 se0530209 trone mosse * 685,8 0 12,0816 58,4669 se0530210 lilla rydet * 3,2 0 13,7245 57,8315 se0530211 attorp * 3,6 0 13,396 57,6898 se0530212 korpeboberg * 17,7 0 13,4225 57,7309 se0530213 ramlamossen * 388,9 0 13,199 58,0638 se0530214 ra- och rullamossen * 262,2 0 13,5449 57,764 se0540008 bare mosse * 74,4 0 13,9655 58,0126 se0540013 sj ngen 1,3 0 13,6489 58,1038 se0540015 gorsan 3,6 0 13,8363 58,108 se0540026 gr ne mad * 83 0 13,5186 58,1843 se0540029 lammevadsk rret 3,6 0 13,8117 58,1633 se0540047 sydbillingens plat * 1 681,6 0 13,7403 58,3663 se0540063 kinnekulle * 7134 0 13,3861 58,5732 se0540070 uvviken * 354,7 0 14,6982 58,6774 se0540073 uggleberget * 16,9 0 14,3355 58,7373 se0540075 tiveden * 388,6 0 14,6338 58,7123 se0540076 djur arna * 2 323,3 0 13,4652 58,8468 se0540077 bromm sk rg rd * 1 810,6 0 13,6526 58,8317 se0540078 kalv sk rg rd * 2 411,7 0 13,8734 58,8783 se0540081 sparres ter * 42,4 0 13,7108 58,5003 se0540082 valekleven-ombo ar * 579 0 14,569 58,6289 se0540083 ruderskogen * 32,1 0 14,2248 58,4014 se0540084 hornborgasj n * 4 080,3 0 13,5482 58,3124 se0540085 k llands sk rg rdar * 6 495,6 0 13,1151 58,6768 se0540088 eahagen * 346 0 13,6715 58,442 se0540090 lycke * 173,3 0 13,7341 58,467 se0540093 klasborgs och v mbs ngar * 89,2 0 13,8043 58,3757 se0540094 karlsfors * 46,3 0 13,7493 58,4976 se0540095 garpar r * 44,2 0 13,8366 58,4979 se0540096 b let * 71 0 14,5146 58,6162 se0540097 h gsb la * 32,2 0 13,7662 58,5101 se0540098 bockaskede 29 0 13,7239 58,4519 se0540100 nolberget * 26,2 0 13,7542 58,4673 se0540101 gamla ekudden 26,7 0 13,8045 58,7174 se0540103 sur bokskog 19,7 0 13,9483 58,8194 se0540104 mularpsb cken * 17,1 0 13,7228 58,1674 se0540106 melldala * 12,5 0 13,7565 58,5068 se0540107 f gel arna 11,3 0 13,3079 58,554 se0540108 b ckag rden * 8,6 0 13,8356 58,4796 se0540109 ja hed * 7,4 0 13,7217 58,2412 se0540110 skansen l ck * 6,6 0 13,1384 58,628 se0540111 kleven * 20,2 0 13,7308 58,189 se0540112 dalamyrar * 5,9 0 13,8214 58,252 se0540113 djupadalen-dala * 4,9 0 13,75 58,2523 se0540114 nolg rden-n s 4,1 0 13,7007 58,0835 se0540115 liden * 3,8 0 13,8164 58,453 se0540116 kloster ngen 4,3 0 13,7192 58,621 se0540117 smula s * 4,2 0 13,5936 58,0471 se0540118 varholmen 2,9 0 13,7569 58,2625 se0540121 djupadalen-karleby * 2,5 0 13,6408 58,1719 se0540122 sk ningstorpsk rret * 2,7 0 13,8554 58,4325 se0540123 skogastorpsk rret * 0,75 0 13,7346 58,2389 se0540124 kullabolet 1,2 0 13,8143 58,3429 se0540150 hene * 155,3 0 13,8171 58,3554 se0540151 r nna * 97,3 0 13,8254 58,4493 se0540152 nya dala-sten sen * 151,4 0 13,7553 58,2561 se0540153 m ssebergs stsluttning * 24,3 0 13,544 58,1859 se0540154 j ttenek rret * 11,5 0 13,5346 58,1996 se0540155 f rdala * 43,5 0 13,7319 58,1837 se0540156 skogastorps g rd * 30,3 0 13,7434 58,2392 se0540160 r alsumpskog * 12 0 14,3926 58,4085 se0540161 grimmestorp * 106,9 0 13,9355 58,0777 se0540162 kalls gsmossen * 10,1 0 13,7699 58,3273 se0540163 bl ngsmossen * 447,2 0 13,79 58,4322 se0540164 brunsbo ng * 105,1 0 13,4998 58,4044 se0540165 tovaberget * 31,8 0 13,6598 58,3174 se0540166 karsmossen, store * 9,7 0 14,0921 58,9072 se0540167 gunniltorp * 31,5 0 13,7617 58,2207 se0540168 ettaks str mmar * 59,4 0 13,9082 58,1064 se0540169 lleberg * 157,8 0 13,6024 58,1345 se0540170 gullakrokssj arna * 15,9 0 13,6926 58,4702 se0540171 klyftamon * 417,3 0 13,6522 58,4978 se0540172 healet 3,9 0 13,4408 58,2021 se0540176 vr h lan * 71,3 0 13,4722 58,1852 se0540177 sl ta jutag rden 0,74 0 13,6411 58,102 se0540178 sl ta tr dg rden 1,1 0 13,6442 58,1109 se0540179 falk ping krokstorp 0,91 0 13,5595 58,143 se0540180 falk ping bestorpsk rret 0,73 0 13,5239 58,1704 se0540181 frigger ker stora b ckabo 1,2 0 13,5883 58,1956 se0540182 torbj rntorp backabo 1,4 0 13,6228 58,198 se0540183 mularp kullag rdet 2 0 13,6955 58,1611 se0540184 tiarp bergs ngarna 2,9 0 13,7476 58,1963 se0540185 g khem k llarsab cken * 5,7 0 13,3951 58,2015 se0540186 skr ddareg rden 1,2 0 13,5171 58,2063 se0540187 gudhem j ttene 0,61 0 13,531 58,2062 se0540188 h gstena bosg rden 1,3 0 13,7095 58,2296 se0540189 hedeg rden * 4,5 0 13,7103 58,2405 se0540190 segerstad kolbog rden 0,97 0 13,6598 58,239 se0540191 dala vallstorp 1 0 13,734 58,2503 se0540192 bolum s ckesten 1,4 0 13,6492 58,3051 se0540193 bolum hov 1 0 13,6351 58,3087 se0540194 borgunda nolheden 2,4 0 13,7725 58,3071 se0540195 brunnhem smedsg rden 1,2 0 13,694 58,2897 se0540196 kull * 59,6 0 13,6214 58,3925 se0540197 axevalla hed * 148,4 0 13,5864 58,395 se0540198 stora h jen * 39,4 0 13,7388 58,4577 se0540199 loringahagen * 21,8 0 13,8202 58,322 se0540200 loringaskogen * 4,5 0 13,8218 58,327 se0540201 nohlmarken * 7,1 0 13,8271 58,3335 se0540202 ryds ngar * 170,7 0 13,8359 58,4319 se0540203 st nges ter 3,3 0 13,8458 58,4635 se0540204 k llebacken * 3,1 0 14,1274 58,1608 se0540205 mofalla torp * 1,3 0 14,2429 58,3629 se0540206 minnesfj llet 9 0 13,7349 58,6268 se0540207 fredsbergs mosse * 706,3 0 14,0391 58,7267 se0540208 folkeberg * 2,8 0 14,2059 58,8799 se0540209 h jentorp-drottningkullen * 917,3 0 13,6438 58,4113 se0540210 karlsborgs f stning 14,7 0 14,5251 58,5272 se0540211 ingvaldstorpsk rret 2,4 0 13,6825 58,2876 se0540212 vitg len-tj remossen * 143,1 0 14,041 58,0267 se0540213 gullsp ngs lven * 174,4 0 14,0844 59,0151 se0540214 hjo ns dalg ng * 21 0 14,2719 58,3072 se0540215 ab cken 6,6 0 14,2608 58,412 se0540216 skebyk rret 1,2 0 13,2931 58,4963 se0540217 leaby 35,9 0 13,6455 58,1301 se0540218 str msholm * 14,7 0 13,3019 58,0952 se0540219 engelska parken 22,4 0 13,879 58,3353 se0540220 tovatorpsb cken * 29 0 13,8513 58,3568 se0540221 k lledalsb cken * 19,3 0 13,8657 58,3677 se0540225 v stra v ttern 59 317,6 0 14,4907 58,4056 se0540250 lilla almn s 8,7 0 14,2668 58,2613 se0540251 f gel s pr stg rd, nord 10,8 0 14,2711 58,2655 se0540252 stora alm 2,1 0 14,2284 58,2591 se0540253 ving ngen * 15,3 0 13,5694 58,3795 se0540254 munstorp * 12,8 0 13,5223 58,4426 se0540255 mariedal * 36,1 0 13,4191 58,4667 se0540256 olof-svensg rden * 4,9 0 13,5075 58,4993 se0540257 stensholmen * 2,1 0 13,0513 58,5704 se0540258 kedums-torpa * 18,5 0 12,9126 58,4658 se0540259 svaneberg-lilla myran * 29,7 0 13,6755 58,6462 se0540260 lindbergs dom nreservat * 6,5 0 13,695 58,5669 se0540261 ribbingsfors ekhage * 17,5 0 14,1123 58,9618 se0540262 bissg rden 6 0 13,8092 58,335 se0540263 levene ng * 15,4 0 12,8983 58,3364 se0540264 forentorp 21,2 0 13,5309 58,2439 se0540265 kringlarp * 0,31 0 13,4753 57,979 se0540266 solberga 0,46 0 13,6045 57,9902 se0540267 drottens ng * 0,63 0 13,6832 57,9745 se0540268 lilla ambj rntorp 0,22 0 13,336 58,026 se0540269 svennag rden 2,6 0 13,6806 58,0726 se0540270 sl ta backg rden 0,96 0 13,6133 58,1105 se0540271 skatteberg 0,84 0 13,6667 58,0986 se0540272 trosseberget 0,79 0 13,5831 58,1413 se0540273 dotorp 0,07 0 13,5745 58,1816 se0540274 storp 2,4 0 13,6655 58,2261 se0540275 segerstad storeg rden 0,36 0 13,6572 58,2336 se0540276 ramstorp 2,5 0 13,7861 58,2741 se0540277 h gstena skarpeg rden 0,15 0 13,7106 58,2226 se0540278 alvared * 0,62 0 13,5591 58,0282 se0540279 g teve bossg rden 1 0 13,4466 58,1251 se0540280 sotekullen 0,33 0 13,6204 58,1425 se0540281 tovarp 2,3 0 13,449 58,1061 se0540282 saka bondeg rden 0,42 0 13,649 58,0629 se0540283 n s h jentorp 4,8 0 13,6935 58,0777 se0540284 kv ttak 1,7 0 13,7024 58,0861 se0540285 brunnhem mossag rden 0,98 0 13,6952 58,3011 se0540286 kurebo * 2,9 0 13,45 57,9822 se0540287 narven 0,77 0 13,5014 58,161 se0540289 sl ttaberget 2,9 0 13,4265 58,1803 se0540290 sakullen 1,9 0 13,6805 58,2765 se0540291 k llstorp * 47,5 0 12,9146 58,5074 se0540292 drakaberget * 28,6 0 13,1656 58,6262 se0540293 greby backar * 13,6 0 13,9598 58,7567 se0540294 dyren s sj torp * 5,6 0 13,7265 58,5862 se0540295 hassle gr neb ck * 2 0 13,9159 58,7881 se0540296 stenum ruderna * 14,4 0 13,4901 58,3433 se0540297 h kaberg * 8,9 0 13,6556 58,4681 se0540298 botorp * 45,9 0 13,4008 58,3367 se0540299 esbj rntorp * 10,4 0 14,0527 58,3682 se0540300 herrhagen * 15,1 0 13,7706 58,3373 se0540301 r sj mosse och m rbysj n * 1 723,7 0 13,3868 58,2645 se0540302 berg, kila 1,2 0 13,7768 58,4851 se0540303 rtek rr * 16 0 14,3315 58,4958 se0540304 djupasj n 12,9 0 13,8499 58,2268 se0540305 v ttak kungsg rden * 5,6 0 13,8728 58,0956 se0540306 gullerstorp 14 0 13,7613 58,1045 se0540307 huvudshemmet * 7,9 0 14,0466 58,1121 se0540308 havsj berg * 12,4 0 14,0708 58,1082 se0540309 eldslyckan-kobon s * 152,8 0 13,9692 58,2085 se0540310 ranahult * 5,2 0 13,1362 58,1165 se0540311 skallstaden 14,6 0 13,135 58,1455 se0540312 stenhusg rden-bondeg rden-pr stebolet 7 0 13,6355 58,0597 se0540313 stora backabo och lilla katorp 13 0 13,5943 58,2202 se0540314 backek rr * 3,9 0 13,7153 58,2863 se0540315 holmahagen * 21,8 0 13,7263 58,0465 se0540316 nordfalan-hopamarka * 22,1 0 13,6226 58,1706 se0540317 simonstorp * 10,5 0 13,3912 58,083 se0540318 bete vid storhultab cken * 2,3 0 14,214 58,8116 se0540319 suntr lje, recklan * 9,9 0 13,4206 58,4828 se0540320 per olofsg rden * 8,1 0 13,5968 58,5314 se0540321 h lledal * 12,5 0 13,5018 58,6048 se0540322 svebr ta-hedvigsn s * 120 0 14,145 58,3767 se0540323 hulta hagar * 5,9 0 14,492 58,6788 se0540326 hovet 36,5 0 14,3705 58,6892 se0540327 torp * 92,4 0 13,6882 58,4129 se0540328 baggesten * 15,1 0 13,5979 58,6824 se0540329 varaskogen * 797,6 0 13,502 58,6605 se0540330 n set 2,1 0 14,3204 58,7376 se0540331 myrhulta mosse * 1 117,4 0 14,262 58,7356 se0610001 millesvik och lur sk rg rd * 23 862,6 0 13,1814 58,8553 se0610004 inre kilsviken * 128,6 0 14,0847 59,1149 se0610006 v rmlandssk rg rden * 21 450,4 0 13,849 59,2801 se0610010 n t n- r sviken * 2 188,5 0 14,0566 59,065 se0610013 gillertj rn * 38,5 0 12,6325 59,3384 se0610023 kummel n 27,3 0 13,9754 59,3239 se0610028 ulvsj myrarna * 476,2 0 12,1917 59,4911 se0610029 tegen * 11,2 0 12,1888 59,2878 se0610031 bjursj h jden * 152,7 0 12,5481 59,3819 se0610050 gettj rnskl tten * 26,1 0 12,9482 59,893 se0610051 tiskaretj rn * 21,5 0 12,7623 59,9185 se0610052 kalvh jden * 4,5 0 12,8003 59,9128 se0610071 ritam ki 16 0 12,5411 60,1496 se0610084 abborrtj rnsberg 14,9 0 12,6306 60,4467 se0610089 ivana * 76,9 0 12,6792 60,6144 se0610095 br nberget * 315 0 12,6947 60,9461 se0610097 h ljberget * 70,3 0 12,3167 61,0096 se0610104 vimyren * 167,2 0 13,261 60,2992 se0610106 flatsmossen * 230,4 0 11,9569 59,6213 se0610120 kesebotten * 197,2 0 12,0098 59,5774 se0610121 lung lvsravinerna * 247,2 0 14,0132 59,6495 se0610122 hovfj llet * 395,8 0 12,9664 60,2933 se0610123 geijersdalsmossen * 318,6 0 13,98 59,6224 se0610126 f nstj rnsskogen * 92,6 0 13,3597 60,4574 se0610127 titj rnsskogen * 127,2 0 13,2861 60,343 se0610129 yttre hedane * 10,1 0 12,5718 59,1349 se0610133 r dvattnet-majendal * 1 350,5 0 12,4828 59,4872 se0610134 horsstomyren * 246 0 12,882 60,8384 se0610135 pannkakan * 115,3 0 13,5204 59,6095 se0610137 rvattnet * 40,6 0 12,7377 59,7345 se0610138 h ltebyns brandf lt * 32,2 0 12,0877 59,5824 se0610140 edeby * 24,7 0 13,488 59,6856 se0610141 kaplansholmen * 168,5 0 13,5779 59,3766 se0610142 ginbergs ngen * 54,1 0 13,5444 60,1273 se0610143 r nnberg * 86,8 0 12,6666 60,3244 se0610144 brattfors brandf lt * 80,6 0 13,9872 59,6577 se0610145 gultberget 60,7 0 13,032 60,2379 se0610146 r glandaberget * 10,7 0 13,713 59,6517 se0610147 deletj rns sen * 50,4 0 12,0967 59,6083 se0610148 nordbyberget * 3,1 0 13,6256 59,6395 se0610153 gullsj lven 2,1 0 12,6601 59,3109 se0610154 branter i danoomr det 65,5 0 11,8432 59,3389 se0610155 st mne * 30,6 0 12,7637 59,4206 se0610158 bryngelsdalen * 165,6 0 11,7443 59,6103 se0610159 lg n-m rteb cken 4,9 0 12,4611 59,6286 se0610160 sloruds lven 13,7 0 12,8872 59,69 se0610161 dals lven 2,9 0 12,4369 59,7744 se0610162 jen sb cken 1,4 0 12,4738 59,7627 se0610163 torgilsruds lven 3,6 0 12,1905 59,8294 se0610164 billan 4,7 0 12,3415 59,9389 se0610166 bengtsh jden * 441,2 0 14,3753 59,8223 se0610167 danshallmyren * 539,6 0 12,566 60,1824 se0610168 ratt n 11,3 0 12,8999 60,3696 se0610169 klar lven, vre delen 2 137,4 0 13,1708 60,4659 se0610170 nordsj skogen * 28,3 0 13,5841 60,32 se0610171 fr kensj myrarna * 1 747,2 0 13,9488 60,1614 se0610172 makkaraberget * 34,5 0 12,5272 60,6851 se0610174 mtberget * 340,5 0 12,8048 60,7911 se0610175 enberget * 249,3 0 12,5828 60,8612 se0610178 brattforsheden * 10 538,5 0 13,8889 59,6967 se0610179 aver fj ll * 109,4 0 12,9703 60,777 se0610180 gartosofta * 67,4 0 12,65 60,6003 se0610181 visnums stormosse * 274,2 0 14,1322 59,141 se0610182 r da stormosse * 257,5 0 13,5371 60,0018 se0610183 stormossen finndalen * 436,6 0 14,0063 59,5825 se0610184 riksmossen * 247,8 0 13,9123 59,3974 se0610185 lung lvens myrar * 625,6 0 14,1412 59,574 se0610186 p ggon tto * 327,7 0 12,3812 61,0316 se0610187 aspberget nyg rdss tern 13,5 0 12,4099 61,0363 se0610188 m ns-olasberget * 73,3 0 12,6702 60,1096 se0610189 bergs kl tt * 69 0 12,4755 59,659 se0610190 klar lvsdeltat * 756,2 0 13,4891 59,353 se0610191 torrakberget * 67,3 0 13,6047 59,6474 se0610193 granberget * 128,1 0 12,7385 60,899 se0610194 torsberget * 64,1 0 13,5838 59,6581 se0610195 alster lven gunnerud 5,9 0 13,6011 59,4169 se0610196 tj rn v ster om buteljhalsmyren * 2,7 0 13,3507 60,4725 se0610197 tippatj rnarna * 12,1 0 13,3116 60,149 se0610198 r bergstj rnarna * 9,5 0 13,4561 60,0364 se0610199 dusten 3,6 0 13,338 60,0256 se0610200 m rramyren * 1 751,1 0 12,3388 60,9587 se0610201 dundern * 149,5 0 12,6306 60,6057 se0610202 gobackberget * 418,5 0 13,059 60,8042 se0610203 lmeviken * 1 145,1 0 13,9899 59,3299 se0610204 tj rnar vid jan i myren * 4,5 0 12,8968 60,2425 se0610205 jordbacktj rnarna 6,7 0 13,6771 59,8442 se0610206 h ljan 41,6 0 12,4364 60,9626 se0610207 likan med tillfl de 28,3 0 13,0435 60,662 se0610208 f mtan 61,7 0 13,1894 60,595 se0610209 byamossarna * 465,3 0 12,6897 59,7683 se0610210 guldplatshagen 1,9 0 14,3219 59,775 se0610211 potten 2 0 13,857 59,6442 se0610212 rib cken * 1,6 0 13,2383 59,6687 se0610213 tj rnberget * 11,2 0 13,5211 59,6719 se0610214 korpberget 4,7 0 13,5406 59,6675 se0610215 rtenberget * 13,6 0 13,5942 59,6928 se0610216 gullh ttkullen * 6,1 0 13,5953 59,7019 se0610217 nordmarksmyrarna * 243,1 0 14,057 59,8389 se0610218 munkmossarna * 531,3 0 14,306 59,9661 se0610219 k larna * 2 611,7 0 13,2271 60,6378 se0610220 skaksk len * 1290 0 13,338 60,5618 se0610221 noret 12,4 0 13,499 60,0559 se0610222 tibergs udde 4,9 0 14,2559 59,8546 se0610223 n s * 1,5 0 13,4503 59,6733 se0610224 m grevsb cken 2,8 0 14,3095 59,9139 se0610225 drans lvskogar * 21,5 0 13,5169 59,614 se0610226 torps bergbrant * 20,3 0 12,6861 59,3216 se0610227 stra h jden 1,2 0 14,3443 59,8876 se0610228 genb cken * 1,7 0 13,5683 59,6508 se0610229 kronefj llet * 21,7 0 12,054 59,7844 se0610230 grundan 6 0 13,4419 60,1746 se0610231 gruvberget 7,5 0 13,5764 59,6987 se0610232 l ngtj rnsberget * 5,6 0 13,563 59,7061 se0610233 knappn s * 19 0 13,0276 60,6202 se0610234 humsj n nerg rden * 4,2 0 12,7662 59,9383 se0610235 erola 1,1 0 12,7261 60,5667 se0610237 lafallh jden 5 0 12,5951 59,931 se0610238 kammesmakk * 0,89 0 12,7034 60,016 se0610240 r n lvens kanjon 3,3 0 12,7787 60,2567 se0610241 skrallarberget * 86,9 0 13,1286 60,6989 se0610242 torrkn len * 205,1 0 12,5735 60,9945 se0610243 bergvattsdalen * 24,8 0 11,8982 59,615 se0610244 br nnan * 154,9 0 11,9765 59,5949 se0610245 husmanskn len * 97,7 0 12,5835 60,8137 se0610246 mammasberg * 69,2 0 12,624 60,6255 se0610247 soienm gg * 61,1 0 12,6475 60,6304 se0610248 v rmlands s by * 184,2 0 14,129 59,063 se0610251 sk rsj branten * 3,1 0 11,9939 59,7314 se0610252 v stersj n * 1 557,6 0 12,4104 60,9029 se0610253 kackerudsmossen * 76,2 0 12,8782 59,3109 se0610254 blomsterhultsmossen * 33 0 14,2161 59,2225 se0610255 stormossen mickelsrud v stra * 70,8 0 14,2962 59,1409 se0620001 l ngfj llet-st djan-nipfj llet * 93 785,9 0 12,6179 62,0925 se0620002 vedungsfj llen * 19 385,7 0 13,2513 61,9306 se0620003 fj t lven och v stvallen i storfj ten 299 0 13,1284 61,8901 se0620004 sundb cken * 159,6 0 12,7638 61,8723 se0620005 stor n- sterdal lven 819 0 12,7788 61,8868 se0620006 karmor sen * 512,6 0 12,5237 61,8389 se0620007 eksj berget * 339 0 12,5878 61,8043 se0620008 nys tern * 12,9 0 12,6325 61,7887 se0620009 drevfj llen * 33 158,3 0 12,339 61,7066 se0620011 byggninga n * 90,4 0 12,8554 61,7797 se0620014 krakelandet * 210,6 0 13,2886 61,7686 se0620015 fulufj llet * 40 737,2 0 12,7276 61,5509 se0620016 fulu lven 262,4 0 12,9813 61,4955 se0620017 trollvasslan * 219,3 0 12,7961 61,6577 se0620018 tv rhugget * 34,9 0 12,8382 61,651 se0620019 gammels tern * 32,4 0 13,2606 61,6187 se0620020 stenskrullen * 49,2 0 13,4056 61,6125 se0620022 bj rn n * 57,7 0 13,2697 61,3784 se0620023 gryvel n * 383,3 0 13,458 61,3933 se0620024 skars sfj llet * 2 292,9 0 12,8918 61,3439 se0620025 h lla * 319,6 0 13,1185 61,2928 se0620026 g r lven-v sterdal lven 588 0 13,3243 61,0203 se0620027 piltlokarna * 107,2 0 13,4602 61,4956 se0620029 s dra trollegrav * 154,6 0 13,6332 61,5694 se0620030 norra trollegrav * 197,7 0 13,7355 61,6392 se0620031 naturreservatet r dbergets dom nreservat * 634,3 0 13,8566 61,5865 se0620032 draggaberget * 41,1 0 13,7381 61,5166 se0620033 rivsj vasslan * 59,3 0 13,7017 61,4885 se0620034 rensj n * 748,6 0 13,6199 61,4359 se0620035 svartgessi * 68,6 0 13,5562 61,3166 se0620036 l ngsj blik * 200,8 0 13,835 61,4793 se0620038 rotensugnet * 54,2 0 13,9779 61,5289 se0620041 anjosvarden-stop n-v mhusk len * 6 044,2 0 14,2712 61,4629 se0620042 n cksj varden * 2 049,9 0 14,3137 61,3691 se0620043 norra g llsj n * 401 0 14,4421 61,5821 se0620046 korpim ki * 598,7 0 14,6356 61,4479 se0620047 ster berget * 159,1 0 14,7926 61,4445 se0620048 kopp ngen * 4935 0 14,7904 61,3531 se0620049 barkbergsknopparna * 170,9 0 14,9165 61,4504 se0620053 g sberget * 586 0 15,3364 61,3031 se0620054 stor-n rfj llet * 5 517,1 0 12,9397 61,2353 se0620055 hundfj llet * 579,1 0 13,0199 61,1338 se0620061 stora almsj n * 57,3 0 13,2249 60,8773 se0620062 tand vala * 3 512,4 0 13,1613 60,8507 se0620064 g stj rnsk len * 408,5 0 13,5903 60,9805 se0620067 hykjeberg * 69,1 0 14,2006 61,2695 se0620068 s derberget * 25,5 0 14,2574 61,0764 se0620069 alder ngarna * 114,5 0 14,432 61,0476 se0620073 skinnar nget * 88,6 0 14,7652 61,1059 se0620074 knutar einars ng 0,39 0 14,6299 61,1041 se0620081 stik s lsb cken * 17,5 0 14,3227 60,8946 se0620082 tenningbr ndan * 121,7 0 15,0051 61,2964 se0620083 mor nget * 28,7 0 15,1092 61,1348 se0620084 bl bergs sflyten * 299,9 0 15,5429 61,0931 se0620086 l nnmarken 8,8 0 15,2822 61,0222 se0620088 styggforsen * 12,4 0 15,1908 61,0063 se0620089 stbj rka 4,2 0 15,1351 60,9784 se0620091 v ckelberget * 11,9 0 15,7325 60,8946 se0620093 spj rsh llen * 153 0 15,8766 60,9092 se0620095 s rmyren * 122,8 0 16,0757 60,8984 se0620096 h gsveden * 16,9 0 16,2354 60,8737 se0620099 lybergsgnupen * 216,4 0 13,6779 60,8589 se0620101 fux-andersknallarna * 231,7 0 14,3683 60,7553 se0620102 sn ttuberget * 39,7 0 14,2578 60,6396 se0620103 haftahedarna * 1 342,9 0 13,8638 60,4363 se0620104 h stingsflotten * 783,7 0 14,35 60,4721 se0620107 s ng n 246,3 0 14,7782 60,5739 se0620109 b le-fallsbj rken * 80,4 0 15,1581 60,7664 se0620112 g ras-kalles t kt 0,23 0 15,3866 60,7714 se0620114 trolldalen * 65,3 0 15,074 60,5224 se0620117 mossgr sberget * 140,9 0 16,0145 60,7962 se0620118 erik-hans tj rn * 136,4 0 16,1462 60,7659 se0620119 gransj berget * 100,5 0 13,9747 60,3122 se0620122 tj rnberget * 197,8 0 14,3599 60,3903 se0620124 markusfallet * 7,1 0 14,2474 60,1612 se0620130 nybr nnberget * 175,1 0 14,7989 60,263 se0620131 tomossen * 65,9 0 14,8602 60,2251 se0620133 skattl sbergs by * 47,3 0 14,753 60,1783 se0620134 skattl sbergs stormosse * 1 105,7 0 14,7162 60,1493 se0620135 aspfallet * 6,7 0 14,7427 60,1227 se0620136 nittenmossen, v st * 71 0 14,7351 60,0702 se0620137 palah jden * 15,5 0 14,6954 60,0425 se0620139 gyllbergen, ludvikasidan * 544,8 0 15,0924 60,3957 se0620141 tures ng 0,96 0 15,1819 60,3348 se0620142 gamla finntorpet * 6,8 0 15,0673 60,2222 se0620144 j tturn * 49,9 0 15,2776 60,269 se0620145 tv rstupet * 39 0 15,4371 60,3696 se0620148 nedra oppsveten * 24,4 0 15,4598 60,022 se0620151 bispbergs klack * 53,9 0 15,8142 60,3519 se0620154 h sslen * 10,8 0 16,2476 60,2687 se0620156 bredmossen, norr * 47,5 0 16,092 60,1454 se0620158 valla mosse * 94,5 0 16,355 60,3728 se0620160 kungsg rdsholmarna * 299,6 0 16,3047 60,1342 se0620161 risshytte hage 2,2 0 15,6069 60,3371 se0620162 n skilen * 115,5 0 14,5536 60,5374 se0620164 birtj rnsberget * 58,3 0 14,5989 60,4206 se0620168 lilltuppen * 33,3 0 15,6535 60,8821 se0620172 rotsj n * 147,2 0 15,9317 61,0016 se0620174 lort n * 48,6 0 15,171 60,4721 se0620175 stormyrberget * 50,7 0 14,9932 60,4423 se0620176 sturv l * 22 0 15,1847 60,5766 se0620177 ljusfallet-djupdalsv gen 1,6 0 16,3242 60,2874 se0620180 lilla lgberget * 5 0 15,9316 60,1771 se0620182 p lsbenning * 41,8 0 16,1655 60,2686 se0620185 rtknubben * 60,8 0 15,484 60,8166 se0620187 l ngmyran 7,3 0 15,0373 60,3511 se0620188 predikstolen * 33,6 0 15,0104 60,3618 se0620190 bredvalla * 101,9 0 13,1581 61,096 se0620191 b t berget * 59,2 0 13,9488 60,7491 se0620201 kr kbergsk rret * 20,9 0 14,252 60,9447 se0620202 l nghedsberg * 57,5 0 14,4072 60,7098 se0620204 s xberg * 66,9 0 14,3009 60,7954 se0620205 sklitten * 58,4 0 13,8578 60,8771 se0620207 tj berget * 1 933,3 0 14,5053 61,418 se0620209 kyrkberget * 46,1 0 15,4297 60,8806 se0620212 rostberget * 50,7 0 14,3966 60,4534 se0620213 diftalsberget * 43,4 0 12,6028 61,8724 se0620215 gummas * 22,3 0 13,528 61,321 se0620219 skogsbo * 16,2 0 13,6195 61,3874 se0620221 tranuberget * 119,5 0 12,4842 61,863 se0620222 v l berget * 47,7 0 12,8202 61,8429 se0620223 knusberget * 16,6 0 14,8965 60,516 se0620224 gr th let * 28,4 0 14,9259 60,5541 se0620225 myggtj rn * 8 0 15,0079 60,5417 se0620226 gr vsbuan * 19,4 0 15,1136 60,6255 se0620227 djurmo klack-oxberget * 97,5 0 15,1883 60,5605 se0620228 ndl sberg * 33,9 0 15,1631 60,4909 se0620229 br ttj rna n * 12,5 0 15,0049 60,5161 se0620230 pr stbuan * 119,5 0 15,0784 60,4088 se0620231 tansv gga * 92,6 0 15,0072 60,3689 se0620232 svart n * 13,8 0 16,2076 60,1127 se0620233 bysj holmarna-fullsta * 416,7 0 16,5152 60,1781 se0620234 f rnebofj rden, nordv st * 143,1 0 16,6831 60,1971 se0620235 pr stg rds ngen i by 0,14 0 16,4789 60,2004 se0620236 holmsj arna-v st * 276,2 0 15,5486 60,4414 se0620237 gyllbergen, borl ngesidan * 1 081,7 0 15,1342 60,3947 se0620238 v sj n * 6,8 0 16,0901 60,7219 se0620239 realsbo * 19,9 0 16,2448 60,2546 se0620240 lilla lvg ngen 63 0 16,0258 60,2766 se0620241 lybergseggen * 13,6 0 13,5816 60,9175 se0620242 s ppenmyran * 47,3 0 15,3936 60,1412 se0620243 ster berget, st * 123,2 0 14,8098 61,4414 se0620244 kloster * 227,6 0 16,1173 60,3681 se0620245 fj tfallet * 43,8 0 13,2535 61,6694 se0620246 kyrkbytj rn * 43,9 0 15,7219 60,5164 se0620247 gravbergsdalen * 9,5 0 15,4252 60,0397 se0620248 slogfallet * 26,9 0 15,457 59,9709 se0620249 karls kn s * 58,1 0 15,0835 60,5066 se0620250 lind nget * 109,8 0 14,6179 61,1069 se0620251 stackharen * 55 0 16,0574 60,2713 se0620252 lilltansen 0,7 0 15,4712 60,6881 se0620253 fransbo ng 0,19 0 16,2179 60,2785 se0620254 limberget-s rvik 2,3 0 15,1678 60,1859 se0620255 el ndesgraven * 78,4 0 12,7032 62,0513 se0620256 stadssj n * 50,2 0 16,0183 60,2837 se0620257 stadsberget 48,8 0 15,9699 60,294 se0620258 limsj n 125,7 0 15,0195 60,7409 se0620259 g nan 80,5 0 14,5278 60,583 se0620260 h n * 53,1 0 14,4359 60,1831 se0620261 nackarberg * 77,1 0 14,6679 60,0957 se0620262 holmtj rn * 5,2 0 14,7259 60,0487 se0620263 sk rb ckens dom nreservat * 5,9 0 13,9796 61,5135 se0620264 hammarskaftet * 51,9 0 12,3951 61,9593 se0620265 blocktj rn sen * 106,2 0 12,5998 61,736 se0620266 lillfj ten * 423 0 12,9545 62,0003 se0620267 k llsl tten * 9 0 15,4678 60,6256 se0620268 rjas nget * 125,6 0 14,8127 60,4122 se0620269 bj rbergsh llan * 133,9 0 14,6362 60,5788 se0620270 tramsgrav * 48,7 0 14,1899 61,3821 se0620271 stup sen-hisj h llan * 21,6 0 12,2186 61,9565 se0620272 br dl sberget 2,1 0 15,1742 61,0142 se0620273 jutj rn-ovanmyra * 14,3 0 15,2636 60,9803 se0620274 s rboda * 7,9 0 15,248 61,0919 se0620275 trollmosseskogen * 547,9 0 15,2755 61,3482 se0620276 hemshyttan nr * 27,2 0 15,6475 60,0504 se0620277 rsj berget * 21,9 0 13,2125 60,9233 se0620278 det * 49,6 0 16,5125 60,1385 se0620279 h gstrand * 46,1 0 13,228 61,2212 se0620280 stora finnsj n * 19,2 0 16,5199 60,3442 se0620281 konnsj n * 2,3 0 16,3317 60,3284 se0620282 g rdsj arna * 81,9 0 16,5115 60,3315 se0620284 skissen * 140,6 0 16,5581 60,2966 se0620285 tolvsmossen * 33,2 0 16,4915 60,3133 se0620286 krokb cken * 8,9 0 16,3166 60,3411 se0620287 bromsberget * 28,1 0 15,6939 59,977 se0620288 norrviken 28,4 0 14,5831 60,9275 se0620289 agnmyren 3,3 0 14,616 60,9322 se0620290 korantberget * 183,8 0 15,5426 60,8766 se0620291 slogmyrloken * 60,9 0 15,5242 60,7131 se0620292 hornbobr ndan * 131,3 0 16,1264 60,7912 se0620293 l ng n * 13,4 0 16,1089 60,7811 se0620294 gr sberget * 18,4 0 15,6703 60,8851 se0620295 ramsellskogen * 314,7 0 16,1137 60,7111 se0620296 himmelsberget * 17,2 0 16,0273 60,9286 se0620297 berg-annas berg * 30,5 0 16,0657 60,8756 se0620298 tallbergsklitten * 16,2 0 16,0176 60,9716 se0620299 helvetesfallet * 2,1 0 14,7485 61,2673 se0620300 lur n * 24,2 0 15,6326 60,7501 se0620302 k gelberget * 312,3 0 14,8251 60,6094 se0620303 fr sar sen * 13,3 0 14,4772 60,2228 se0620304 kullerbergen * 627 0 14,298 60,182 se0620305 kanaberget * 91,4 0 14,5312 60,1274 se0620306 g nsberget * 52,5 0 14,7613 60,2595 se0620307 lejberget * 622,5 0 14,3194 60,2309 se0620308 risr d 61,2 0 15,2168 60,8908 se0620309 glistj rn * 52,8 0 15,0929 60,9356 se0620310 hagge 7:6 17,9 0 15,3013 60,1195 se0620311 s terdalen * 82,2 0 15,7329 60,366 se0620312 s lsklinten * 106 0 14,431 60,3773 se0620314 storsveden 15,6 0 15,1548 61,0706 se0620315 tryg sk len * 1 419,5 0 13,3271 61,764 se0620316 myrar vid gan * 107,7 0 13,029 61,7918 se0620317 tox sen * 17,3 0 12,634 61,7266 se0620318 ny ngena * 346,5 0 13,3771 61,3821 se0620319 g sj sen * 28,8 0 12,8429 61,8039 se0620320 kimb cken * 45,9 0 13,3365 61,6708 se0620321 guckuskolokaler vid norr lindberg 2,2 0 15,1076 60,8144 se0620323 s lsflotten * 509,1 0 14,6064 60,4444 se0620324 staktj rn * 17,1 0 16,1223 60,5812 se0630004 h gmossen * 6,5 0 16,6849 60,2744 se0630005 b rs n * 9,6 0 16,5508 60,3689 se0630006 k rsberget * 10,9 0 16,5275 60,4051 se0630007 k pmansmossen * 154,1 0 16,5764 60,4098 se0630010 surtj rn * 7,5 0 16,2207 60,6053 se0630017 lomsmuren * 660 0 16,919 60,5189 se0630021 sterbergsmuren * 21,7 0 16,4047 60,7103 se0630023 myrar ster om jaren * 1 731,7 0 16,9277 60,7145 se0630026 orarna * 701,5 0 17,3214 60,6815 se0630027 eggegrund och gr sj lsb dan * 713,8 0 17,5062 60,7282 se0630028 harksk rsfj rden * 348,9 0 17,2959 60,7792 se0630030 sk ltj rnmuren * 258,4 0 16,4749 60,8644 se0630033 h dells gammelskog * 14,8 0 17,0601 60,9583 se0630034 h ckels ngs h gmosse och gnagmur * 375,8 0 17,0405 61,0012 se0630039 tulpans * 1,2 0 15,8785 61,1433 se0630040 stormyran-grann sen * 1 171,4 0 15,9752 61,1669 se0630042 djupsj n-r mmaberget * 87,3 0 16,4753 61,1289 se0630052 n sudden 7,3 0 16,1107 61,3655 se0630055 voxnan * 911,5 0 15,214 61,5643 se0630057 grytaberget * 316,6 0 15,7262 61,5699 se0630060 grossj berget * 421,3 0 16,6115 61,4877 se0630061 ysberget-laxtj rnsberget * 396,3 0 16,6492 61,5469 se0630065 bodareservatet (trollhagarna) * 10,4 0 16,8933 61,5342 se0630067 sn cken 12,6 0 17,174 61,4204 se0630068 ag n-kr k n * 4 622,3 0 17,3891 61,5445 se0630072 stora korpim ki * 1 901,1 0 14,5655 61,6429 se0630073 flarksj berget (uvberget) * 144,9 0 14,6653 61,6663 se0630075 b rningsberget * 102 0 14,6092 61,7455 se0630077 n ver sen * 16,9 0 14,7097 61,7907 se0630079 h genlammsmyran * 456,7 0 14,9435 61,6949 se0630080 tornmyran * 180,3 0 14,9792 61,7292 se0630083 j rvs holmarna * 198,1 0 16,1763 61,6728 se0630084 kyrk n 6 0 16,1788 61,7049 se0630089 h lick * 598 0 17,4696 61,6244 se0630091 l vsalen * 200,9 0 17,454 61,6593 se0630092 klibbalreservatet * 42,9 0 17,4688 61,6764 se0630093 norra hornslandet * 111,6 0 17,4373 61,7254 se0630094 kugg rarna * 50,8 0 17,5189 61,7025 se0630099 ngra n * 280,4 0 15,266 61,9402 se0630100 t rnberget * 162 0 15,3836 61,902 se0630101 mellanljusnan laforsen-korskrogen 475,5 0 15,7054 61,8781 se0630102 sk lvallbr nnan * 119 0 15,5987 61,9864 se0630103 flisberget * 53,7 0 15,5807 62,0334 se0630107 brassberget * 138,2 0 15,7281 62,2012 se0630108 stensj n och lomtj rn * 1 235,6 0 16,256 62,1386 se0630111 bromsvallsberget * 19,2 0 17,024 61,8268 se0630121 ensj lokarna * 95,8 0 15,5395 62,2938 se0630122 h gbr nntj rn * 16,3 0 15,4865 62,3165 se0630125 hag sen * 766,5 0 16,1386 62,2297 se0630129 kl vberget (s dra) * 45,8 0 16,6371 62,2116 se0630134 myrsj myrorna * 353,8 0 16,471 61,0993 se0630136 bondarvsvallsberget * 17,7 0 15,9739 61,6579 se0630139 l ngvind * 787,1 0 17,1896 61,4402 se0630140 en ngers n 21,5 0 16,899 61,5388 se0630150 h stmyrberget * 138,2 0 16,9012 62,1691 se0630153 jordb rsmuren- lbo * 987,7 0 16,9437 60,3151 se0630154 spjutholmen * 154 0 17,2843 60,4543 se0630155 sten orn * 56,4 0 17,2091 61,2471 se0630156 lsj n * 151,3 0 17,0485 61,2741 se0630157 bl ckt rnsj n * 23,9 0 17,2782 60,5572 se0630158 igelsj n * 15 0 17,2772 60,5713 se0630159 s vasj n * 41,5 0 17,3073 60,5636 se0630160 gustavsmurarna * 71,3 0 17,3456 60,6098 se0630161 matyxsj n * 27,9 0 17,3359 60,6215 se0630162 orm n * 74,6 0 17,2075 60,8959 se0630163 gammelstilla-bredmossen * 169,8 0 16,6319 60,4118 se0630164 testebo n * 516,7 0 17,02 60,7584 se0630165 testebo ns delta * 122,7 0 17,1729 60,6892 se0630166 axmar-g sholma * 5 599,6 0 17,2226 61,0545 se0630167 stenb cken * 4,5 0 17,0836 60,6731 se0630168 l ngbro * 155,4 0 16,8014 61,4889 se0630170 vit rarna * 154,2 0 17,5057 61,9892 se0630171 gnarpskaten * 150,4 0 17,4525 62,004 se0630172 gnarps masugn * 225,7 0 17,458 62,0384 se0630173 gran * 473,8 0 17,6341 62,0155 se0630175 gladb cken * 3,2 0 16,2675 61,9654 se0630176 djupb cken * 4,5 0 15,9608 61,8156 se0630177 svansj myran med hamra nationalpark * 178,6 0 14,7568 61,7654 se0630178 s rsundet * 93,9 0 17,2192 60,8916 se0630179 sk rj n * 115,9 0 17,0996 61,0472 se0630180 storr jningsmoran * 50,1 0 17,0408 61,1375 se0630182 oxsand * 30,3 0 17,4778 62,128 se0630184 fr kentj rn * 12,5 0 15,1436 61,7125 se0630187 bredforsen * 221,7 0 17,2149 60,4283 se0630189 vre hedesundafj rden * 597,7 0 16,9686 60,2929 se0630190 f rnebofj rden * 5 087,4 0 16,8016 60,2383 se0630191 ista * 727,6 0 16,7785 60,2382 se0630192 gysinge * 471,1 0 16,8941 60,2808 se0630193 hade * 4,5 0 17,0435 60,2964 se0630194 br nnan * 15,5 0 17,3313 60,602 se0630195 bultbomurarna * 123,9 0 17,3175 60,6232 se0630198 f bods 1,3 0 16,5194 60,4313 se0630201 l ngsj n 6,3 0 16,4294 60,7335 se0630202 m rtsj b cken 0,53 0 16,4304 60,7516 se0630203 gosj n 41 0 16,9422 61,0864 se0630204 tomtas 0,19 0 16,0999 61,1122 se0630205 haga * 2,8 0 16,3548 61,4931 se0630206 galv n 22 0 16,3357 61,3992 se0630207 lill n 1,9 0 15,8617 61,3014 se0630208 morabo * 0,57 0 15,7545 61,4685 se0630209 grytabergsbranten * 71,1 0 15,7578 61,5425 se0630211 lappmyr sen * 59,1 0 14,9297 61,7491 se0630212 l ngtj rnsmyrarna-fl mhalsen * 95,5 0 14,9307 61,7652 se0630213 storkullen * 34,4 0 14,941 61,7949 se0630214 kolarsj b cken 2 0 14,9892 61,7976 se0630215 tv ringen 172,3 0 15,6941 62,2412 se0630216 remman 1,4 0 16,1121 62,0923 se0630217 stensj n 54,7 0 16,5858 61,6431 se0630219 dala n 0,74 0 16,4705 61,9753 se0630220 flotth ljan * 108,4 0 16,1937 62,1172 se0630221 buskan * 0,96 0 16,4755 62,1718 se0630222 lv sen * 428,4 0 16,7516 62,0564 se0630223 mellanljusnan korskrogen-edeforsen 610,6 0 16,0104 61,8095 se0630224 dalsb cken-liljesl ttsb cken * 14,4 0 15,6982 62,0165 se0630225 b ckeskogsvallen 0,63 0 15,7711 62,0241 se0630226 b ckan * 2,2 0 15,8428 61,9996 se0630227 klovb cken * 4,9 0 17,0741 62,0602 se0630228 borrsj n-vikarsj n 45,5 0 16,0544 61,8283 se0630229 f gelsj 2 0 14,6426 61,7634 se0630231 n tsj b cken * 180,1 0 15,1802 61,6598 se0630232 klimparna * 755,3 0 15,7067 61,6158 se0630233 andersvallsmyran * 69,3 0 16,034 61,5608 se0630234 andersvallssl tten * 193 0 16,0609 61,5582 se0630235 taskberget * 54 0 16,9805 61,6755 se0630237 h sthagsberget * 28 0 16,6357 61,1246 se0630238 testebo n-nedre * 99,7 0 17,1194 60,7289 se0630239 lim n * 155,7 0 17,3451 60,7154 se0630240 vitgrund-norrsk r * 322,8 0 17,3968 60,7703 se0630241 h mansmaren * 16,7 0 17,3034 60,7648 se0630242 grinduga * 29,8 0 17,3014 60,6377 se0630244 tunder sen * 31 0 16,0387 61,5084 se0630245 stora sundsj berget * 672,5 0 14,7246 61,6288 se0630246 kyrksj n 59,5 0 16,0853 61,8237 se0630247 jugansbo 15,7 0 17,0809 60,2987 se0630248 kolbosveden * 10,1 0 16,633 60,339 se0630249 viksj * 2,6 0 16,9134 60,9722 se0630250 rsunda 2,2 0 16,7389 60,5179 se0630251 oppeg rden * 3 0 17,0394 61,7628 se0630252 pr stvallen * 1,5 0 16,0503 61,5809 se0630253 and n * 141,9 0 16,0976 61,46 se0630254 hedesundaskogen * 51,6 0 17,0234 60,4522 se0630255 storberget * 182,7 0 16,8727 61,7064 se0630256 stormyran-blistermyran * 1 537,4 0 15,3553 61,7939 se0630257 l ngh llskogen * 81,9 0 17,338 60,5867 se0630258 styggmurarna * 132,2 0 17,2682 60,5531 se0630259 lkarstj rnarna * 718,2 0 15,3568 61,4338 se0630260 finngrundet- stra banken 23 151,2 0 18,4637 60,9822 se0630261 l vgrunds rabbar 533,9 0 17,522 60,8169 se0630262 finngrundet-v stra banken 8315 0 17,9964 60,9394 se0630263 finngrundet-norra banken 1 338,2 0 18,1764 61,0341 se0710002 malungsfluggen * 30,5 0 16,8944 62,1775 se0710004 kl vberget (norra) * 23,5 0 16,6339 62,2156 se0710005 r dmyr sen * 19,8 0 16,7456 62,215 se0710008 stormyrskogen * 422,5 0 16,2508 62,2569 se0710016 l ngharsholmen * 108 0 17,4735 62,4707 se0710019 rankleven * 51,9 0 15,9527 62,5129 se0710021 bj rntj rn * 84,6 0 15,0869 62,5224 se0710028 smitingen-h rn klubb * 227,9 0 18,0369 62,5963 se0710031 sundsj sen * 417,3 0 16,87 62,6395 se0710033 j mtgaveln * 3 064,9 0 15,8943 62,6759 se0710034 sen * 133,7 0 16,6832 62,7226 se0710037 lovik-storflon * 397,7 0 16,4971 62,7829 se0710038 fager sen * 291,4 0 17,0884 62,7994 se0710040 rig sen * 9,6 0 17,0482 62,8219 se0710042 h gbonden * 347,2 0 18,4763 62,8741 se0710044 v llingsj urskog * 229,2 0 17,2087 62,9118 se0710046 halsviksravinen * 63,2 0 18,4338 62,9241 se0710048 omneberget * 29,6 0 18,3395 62,9575 se0710054 skuleskogen * 3 058,4 0 18,4841 63,111 se0710056 trysunda * 1 051,8 0 18,7885 63,1358 se0710057 balesudden * 917,9 0 18,6882 63,174 se0710058 svartn sudden * 63,6 0 18,0708 63,174 se0710059 v stan h jden * 261,1 0 18,2328 63,1769 se0710060 pr stflon * 70,1 0 16,4917 63,2434 se0710062 stork len * 92,2 0 16,6462 63,261 se0710065 gide bergsmyrarna * 139,1 0 16,5622 63,2936 se0710070 r gsvedjeberget * 46,2 0 16,8995 63,415 se0710075 t gsj br nnan * 19,2 0 17,348 63,5851 se0710077 k lhuvudet * 770,3 0 18,4202 63,634 se0710082 herrbergsliden * 134 0 18,7747 63,7429 se0710083 v nd tberget * 298,7 0 18,3129 63,8031 se0710084 lillsj sl ttern * 4,9 0 17,8499 63,8139 se0710086 trolltj rn * 63,7 0 18,0496 63,8425 se0710088 ruskh jden * 25,5 0 16,8726 63,8796 se0710089 rismyrberget * 34,7 0 17,8603 63,8853 se0710090 stockholmsgatorna (s dra) * 29,5 0 17,84 63,896 se0710107 gammtratten * 743,2 0 18,122 63,859 se0710108 svarttj rns sen * 77,8 0 15,21 62,5805 se0710111 s r-skirsj berget * 71,1 0 16,5855 63,8581 se0710131 vre sul n * 325,9 0 16,8372 62,5966 se0710132 s r-lappmyran * 254,2 0 17,5759 62,8808 se0710142 villmyran * 5,3 0 18,5016 62,992 se0710143 gn ggen 28,5 0 18,6193 62,9463 se0710144 mossatr sk * 900,4 0 17,3031 63,8345 se0710146 oringsj /mo-l ngsj n * 196,7 0 17,1241 63,4443 se0710147 b galiden * 97,1 0 18,3373 63,7408 se0710148 lgberget-bj rnberget * 266,4 0 17,4463 62,9288 se0710149 stensj flon * 841,6 0 16,4594 63,2652 se0710150 djupdalen * 495,9 0 16,5612 63,2687 se0710151 nipsippan i n ssj by 1,8 0 16,3455 63,5838 se0710152 storn set * 107 0 17,496 62,4513 se0710153 hemlings n 1 756,6 0 18,1983 63,7283 se0710154 grenforsen * 30,7 0 17,2211 62,3068 se0710155 helvetesbr nnan (s dra) * 2 386,7 0 15,3292 62,5886 se0710156 ensillre kalkbarrskog * 11,4 0 15,7386 62,5791 se0710157 granbod sen 17,2 0 15,6095 62,6117 se0710158 smedsg rden * 4,4 0 17,4447 62,4416 se0710159 gammelbodarna 5,7 0 15,8353 62,5706 se0710160 h g nge 2,4 0 16,6862 62,3171 se0710161 nipsippan vid kr ngen 3,8 0 16,4161 63,5712 se0710163 raviner vid latmansmon * 5,5 0 17,3918 62,7882 se0710164 mo lven 3 152,8 0 18,1339 63,4817 se0710165 l vlund * 33,2 0 16,2729 63,5396 se0710166 del av brem n * 1020 0 17,7056 62,2087 se0710167 guldn sb cken 2,9 0 17,3902 62,6201 se0710169 tolv sand * 13,5 0 17,5383 62,4507 se0710170 rasj b cken-storsvedjan * 227,5 0 17,1306 62,7325 se0710171 bod sen * 9,9 0 15,6576 62,5697 se0710172 ju n 8,2 0 15,5669 62,3626 se0710173 maljan 34,1 0 15,3936 62,3671 se0710174 kullb cken-markb cken * 275,6 0 15,6426 62,5846 se0710175 stormyran-lommyran * 1 051,3 0 15,7165 62,3896 se0710176 vatten n * 226,3 0 15,4714 62,5684 se0710178 salusanden 2,3 0 19,2675 63,4591 se0710179 vitbergsb cken * 1,4 0 18,4231 63,4656 se0710180 granliden * 89,5 0 18,2491 63,7913 se0710181 djupvikberget 1,2 0 18,6709 63,073 se0710182 stormyran p ulv n * 89,5 0 18,6853 63,0569 se0710183 ttj rnsbodarna * 53,2 0 17,7243 63,4492 se0710184 lill-m rdsj b cken 1,2 0 16,2266 63,6424 se0710185 v gsj kn sen * 38,9 0 17,7788 62,5139 se0710186 h gberget * 191,7 0 17,0527 63,4397 se0710187 j ttj rn * 52,4 0 16,9889 63,4165 se0710188 s nnasj bergen * 204,3 0 16,6671 62,2993 se0710189 uvsj n * 171,4 0 17,9078 63,4187 se0710190 hummelvik * 253 0 18,5707 63,1428 se0710191 navar n * 62,8 0 16,7174 62,5997 se0710192 m ckelmyran * 62,3 0 17,4312 62,2547 se0710193 stormyran i njurunda * 53,6 0 17,4003 62,2122 se0710194 fransmyran * 411,9 0 17,0693 63,5186 se0710195 bj rkb cksmyran * 181,6 0 16,5138 62,2698 se0710196 pengsj komplexet * 3696 0 17,6236 63,6962 se0710197 sp ngmyran-r jtj rnsmyran * 815,1 0 16,0953 62,3341 se0710198 juni-stormyran * 51,2 0 17,6012 62,23 se0710199 gr nviksmyran * 53,5 0 17,617 62,2189 se0710200 sumpskog vid fl rkmyran * 2,2 0 17,5654 62,4689 se0710201 rigstak rret * 4,6 0 17,5253 62,5237 se0710202 l ngn smon * 4,2 0 17,3977 62,6416 se0710203 masugnsgrundet * 13,2 0 17,3892 62,5492 se0710204 ravin p ron n 2,7 0 18,6129 63,0779 se0710205 stormyran vid xingen 35,5 0 16,0746 63,6349 se0710206 ravin i holme 2,8 0 16,4343 63,547 se0710207 nordsj vikarna i fax lven 6 0 17,0437 63,1861 se0710208 h glands naturminne 0,4 0 16,6505 62,8164 se0710209 ravin vid lidens gamla kyrka 1,3 0 16,7898 62,6995 se0710210 raviner i nilsb le 4,7 0 16,8762 62,6591 se0710211 linvarpet 6,2 0 17,2232 62,526 se0710212 ensillrebodarna 6,5 0 15,7448 62,5802 se0710213 skjulsta strand ng 6,2 0 16,5915 62,417 se0710214 ny nget 0,57 0 15,8238 62,5546 se0710215 f ren * 0,4 0 17,4938 62,6282 se0710216 lid ngen * 0,59 0 18,1403 62,9628 se0710217 hassel hacksl tt * 0,55 0 16,7629 62,2538 se0710218 fagerviken hacksl tt * 1 0 16,4877 62,6628 se0710219 bl sttorpet * 0,62 0 16,4461 62,2478 se0710220 myckelsj hacksl tt * 0,76 0 17,2084 62,5872 se0710221 myckel ng hagmark * 13,3 0 17,5357 62,4537 se0710222 nipor i myre * 4,4 0 17,0697 63,337 se0710223 remmarn * 1,2 0 18,3071 63,8477 se0710224 indals lvens delta * 146,6 0 17,461 62,5067 se0710225 v nta litets grund 15131 0 18,3253 62,5187 se0720011 stubbarna * 24,3 0 14,4355 62,3244 se0720012 haberget * 50 0 14,9651 62,0529 se0720029 sonfj llet * 11 285,5 0 13,5477 62,2794 se0720050 k ringberget * 36,8 0 16,3389 62,7461 se0720051 svedjan * 3,5 0 16,3195 62,7519 se0720052 b th llan * 4,3 0 16,2563 62,7657 se0720053 valletj rnarna * 14,1 0 16,3619 62,7686 se0720056 n kten 8 264,2 0 14,629 62,8416 se0720058 hoverberget * 118,5 0 14,4353 62,831 se0720065 berge * 73,2 0 14,8339 62,9342 se0720079 v rkallh jden * 26,2 0 16,1219 63,0679 se0720086 billtj rn * 105,2 0 16,5966 63,1002 se0720091 fillstab cken * 13,1 0 14,5446 63,1395 se0720092 odensalak rret * 3,2 0 14,6717 63,1549 se0720094 ndsj n 95,3 0 14,5736 63,1774 se0720117 net * 36,9 0 14,2264 63,3255 se0720131 vackermyren * 123,6 0 15,3524 63,4609 se0720134 offerdalsberg * 198,1 0 14,1705 63,5007 se0720147 k lasl tten * 374,3 0 15,0019 63,6351 se0720172 tannsj * 15,8 0 16,5263 63,9845 se0720183 frostvikenfj llen * 93 793,2 0 14,7125 64,6478 se0720196 lungsj skogen * 251,7 0 16,2133 62,8446 se0720199 gr berget-hotagsfj llen * 118 040,2 0 14,563 64,1415 se0720201 helvetesbr nnan; norra * 998,8 0 15,2762 62,6108 se0720202 jsj myrarna * 746,4 0 15,096 63,4397 se0720213 marntalls sen * 4 058,4 0 13,9802 62,9309 se0720215 br tarna * 3 623,1 0 14,1297 62,8492 se0720221 nybodfl ten * 163,1 0 14,1344 62,3804 se0720240 v gsk let * 51,6 0 14,4568 63,7654 se0720241 margitbr nnan * 71,8 0 14,4925 63,7669 se0720242 n verk lsbodarna; myren norr om * 31,9 0 15,2348 63,5865 se0720243 h g sen * 95,3 0 14,4063 62,2539 se0720244 blektj rn * 90,8 0 15,3709 62,8456 se0720245 v ster-ottsj n * 43,9 0 14,8019 63,7561 se0720246 k sta urskog * 5 0 13,8816 63,3554 se0720247 hal sen * 29 0 14,7185 63,2963 se0720248 storholmsj * 288,7 0 14,2732 63,6765 se0720249 gr ntoppen * 120,7 0 14,299 63,7048 se0720251 borgflon * 34,4 0 15,0497 63,5624 se0720252 fl rkarna * 31,2 0 16,1746 63,0667 se0720253 smyren * 14,3 0 14,5711 63,3881 se0720254 stamn s 5,3 0 15,1665 62,9606 se0720255 r dmyrmyren * 105,3 0 14,5562 63,1037 se0720256 bollsberget * 332 0 16,2428 63,9132 se0720257 mj vattenberget * 76,3 0 16,2057 63,9013 se0720258 rnbergskilen * 65,7 0 14,9113 62,6291 se0720261 skrogg sen * 44,2 0 13,342 63,4206 se0720266 sjuls sen 1 0 14,806 64,3459 se0720267 rosenbergsr karna * 90,2 0 15,3151 63,8613 se0720270 hack svallen 4,3 0 13,4196 61,9574 se0720271 lill-h rj bygget * 54,8 0 13,4775 61,9325 se0720272 br ckvallen 4,5 0 14,0802 62,5374 se0720286 re lven 6483 0 12,6256 63,4533 se0720288 damm n-stor n 200,5 0 13,8513 63,1055 se0720291 ljusnan (hede-svegsj n) 1 937,3 0 13,7823 62,3068 se0720293 voxnan (j mtlands l n) 131 0 14,7841 61,8114 se0720294 gim n; uppstr ms holmsj n 14 454,6 0 15,1911 62,8647 se0720297 r rstr ms lven (j mtlands l n) 1 932,7 0 16,2691 64,1746 se0720298 br ntberget * 59,7 0 16,2993 62,8109 se0720299 djupdalsb cken * 80,6 0 15,9374 62,7653 se0720300 fiskhusberget * 725,8 0 13,5945 63,2653 se0720301 gr nmyran 31 0 16,2573 63,1068 se0720302 jansmyrberget * 27,9 0 16,2189 63,0903 se0720303 katt geltj rnen * 796,1 0 15,7338 63,9792 se0720304 kl ppberget * 82 0 14,5677 62,6889 se0720306 l ngsidberget * 295,7 0 15,1816 62,1025 se0720307 revaberget * 99,4 0 16,6737 62,9264 se0720308 me n * 39 0 16,6149 62,9255 se0720309 snedmyran * 266,1 0 16,45 63,2127 se0720310 sp mansloken * 34,2 0 15,0859 63,2552 se0720312 lillb cken ljung 0,47 0 16,31 62,7604 se0720313 l gden r nningsberg 4,5 0 13,9843 63,3631 se0720314 ol-nilsbodarna brynje 4,2 0 14,9933 63,1664 se0720315 storselet * 20,6 0 15,7901 62,8263 se0720316 storselbodarna * 21,1 0 15,778 62,8305 se0720317 villmyran- ster sen 0,85 0 16,6243 62,9302 se0720321 b telsmyren * 32 0 14,5819 63,3909 se0720322 k llmyren asp s 15,1 0 14,5676 63,4033 se0720325 kl ppe palmh gnen 10,8 0 14,7552 63,262 se0720327 v stra nyhemsb cken 2,7 0 16,0176 63,1944 se0720328 kalvhallb cken * 25 0 15,5209 63,95 se0720329 b ngdalen 1,2 0 14,2973 63,5666 se0720330 storb cken fors-b le * 8,3 0 16,6029 63,0145 se0720331 lgsj berget * 29,2 0 14,728 62,787 se0720332 fors sens orkid k rr * 4,2 0 14,6935 63,6745 se0720336 host n * 34,9 0 15,4627 63,7689 se0720338 stenflon gren skilen * 29,4 0 15,5762 63,6791 se0720340 k sb cken * 10,1 0 14,257 63,5001 se0720341 bodflon fyr n * 56,7 0 15,1474 63,5815 se0720342 m ngbodarna; myr 1 km norr om * 8,3 0 14,7533 63,478 se0720345 t jsan gul sen * 4,1 0 14,9127 63,4827 se0720346 bleksj n r cksj n * 49,5 0 14,4766 63,0883 se0720347 temyran-draviktj rnen * 79 0 16,1245 63,0576 se0720348 strandk rret k rg rde * 0,08 0 14,4823 62,9906 se0720349 gren s j n 0,59 0 15,3911 63,6139 se0720350 n stmyren fugelsta 0,89 0 14,7063 63,104 se0720351 kungsn set * 18,9 0 14,5784 62,9669 se0720352 grytan * 2,5 0 14,7939 63,0976 se0720353 s derg rd brunflo * 1,7 0 14,819 63,0959 se0720354 bodal 0,93 0 14,9005 63,0747 se0720357 johank len 3,9 0 14,1864 62,4316 se0720358 l ngan; nedstr ms land sj n 365,2 0 14,5256 63,434 se0720359 ammer n 4 093,3 0 15,4547 63,5191 se0720360 damm n 87,7 0 13,9066 63,2211 se0720361 h rkan 5 741,3 0 14,6322 63,7258 se0720362 tysj arna * 454,5 0 14,6373 63,2347 se0720363 storflon-andersflon * 229,7 0 14,412 63,3479 se0720364 tunsved * 55,5 0 15,079 62,9545 se0720367 bodberget bj rsj * 187,1 0 15,2495 63,0151 se0720370 l ngs n ytterhogdal 4 0 14,909 62,243 se0720372 skansholmen; v stra 3,6 0 14,4244 63,1332 se0720374 silje sberget * 119 0 15,5115 64,2475 se0720377 laholmsn set * 94,5 0 15,3763 63,9075 se0720378 kn sen h glunda * 6,4 0 15,8135 63,1461 se0720382 acksj n r d n * 13,3 0 14,4738 63,2353 se0720383 aspbacken tr ng * 19,6 0 14,0621 63,3247 se0720384 gl sa; norra * 2,6 0 14,0187 63,3845 se0720385 g rde bj rme * 1,9 0 14,6236 63,0131 se0720386 viken alsen * 19,2 0 14,0373 63,3753 se0720387 vre rise * 11,1 0 14,1719 63,4633 se0720388 nsta * 2,8 0 14,3076 63,0466 se0720389 fagerb cken * 77,3 0 14,7989 62,1357 se0720390 k llberget-storberget * 219,7 0 15,4649 63,3903 se0720391 r tj rnberget-djupdalsberget * 188 0 15,2592 62,0946 se0720392 strangellsbodarna * 270,2 0 15,0157 63,3566 se0720393 s ttmyrberget * 58,3 0 16,2087 63,1207 se0720394 h jden spn s * 143,8 0 15,4715 64,02 se0720395 fettmyren * 34 0 15,4321 62,9045 se0720396 s nnerstmyran * 59,8 0 15,9861 62,9887 se0720397 sl ttflon-bodflon * 56,3 0 16,1695 62,9802 se0720399 flakamyren * 159,5 0 14,666 63,3435 se0720400 g kbodv gen * 28,5 0 14,5119 63,4393 se0720402 svedjeflon-sidflon * 169,1 0 15,5475 63,6878 se0720403 tj rnflon host n * 70,5 0 15,4841 63,759 se0720404 vre och nedre blekan * 12,2 0 14,632 63,3618 se0720405 fastermyrtj rnen, s dra n 1,1 0 15,3941 63,8708 se0720406 j rnk llan ottsj n * 2,9 0 14,8592 63,7694 se0720410 finnsj berget gastsj * 85,9 0 15,8131 62,9798 se0720411 gullh g-t nningfloarna * 1 880,9 0 14,1411 62,1877 se0720412 tr skflyet-oxfl ten * 5 899,2 0 14,4992 62,2247 se0720413 himmelsfl ten * 2 319,9 0 14,6026 62,2608 se0720414 haugr ningan * 125,5 0 14,1248 63,0859 se0720415 k ringmyren j rvn sberget * 21,4 0 15,7296 64,2164 se0720416 dalbergstorpet * 118,8 0 15,7793 62,8075 se0720417 kvarn n utanede * 12,8 0 16,6819 62,9421 se0720418 borggrensviken-s gb cken * 111,5 0 14,5744 63,3109 se0720419 k llmyren kl ppe * 80,5 0 14,7848 63,2269 se0720420 stensundet * 421,4 0 15,0721 63,3089 se0720425 l ngstrandberget * 63 0 15,8097 63,2816 se0720426 traneflob cken * 25,7 0 16,2972 63,2579 se0720427 starrmyran ammer * 23,5 0 16,1805 63,1899 se0720429 silje sen * 322,6 0 15,6423 64,236 se0720430 stormyrh gen * 35,8 0 15,5767 64,1035 se0720431 ol-nilskojan * 162,5 0 15,2835 64,3373 se0720432 s nner-flakamyren * 42,1 0 14,2612 62,8954 se0720437 mellanmyran-abborrholmberget 34,5 0 15,6587 64,4283 se0720438 hagamarken solberg * 44,6 0 15,3922 63,4989 se0720439 stensj n * 1 439,8 0 15,2298 64,4783 se0720440 dalkarlsk len * 4 641,2 0 13,8595 61,6681 se0720441 spr tberget-bodberget * 148,2 0 15,9894 63,9622 se0720444 havmyren * 454,5 0 15,1714 62,6872 se0720445 v stansj * 51,1 0 14,8937 62,1848 se0720446 malm n * 116,9 0 15,7282 63,8866 se0720451 vallrubodarna 24,1 0 14,1758 63,7076 se0720457 v ster sen sarna 1,1 0 14,3635 62,6652 se0720458 blomtorpet hara 2 0 14,4488 63,0546 se0720459 l vbergs ngen sidsj 0,57 0 15,1368 62,7222 se0720460 storv len lockne 2 0 14,7503 63,0271 se0720461 torvalla; ngsmon v stra 0,33 0 14,7573 63,1415 se0720462 sals n 0,27 0 14,5969 62,833 se0720463 borgen; hellmans hage 1,3 0 14,3519 63,0201 se0720467 birkak rret 2,2 0 14,5473 63,2394 se0720468 djupede, l ngan 1,1 0 14,3083 63,5419 se0720469 h gbacken, r n 3,6 0 15,0637 63,4106 se0720470 sundmyren flo * 66,5 0 13,7867 63,507 se0720471 b sen 0,91 0 14,3046 62,5712 se0810001 kron ren * 5 796,4 0 19,4757 63,4292 se0810002 bonden 396,1 0 20,0225 63,4219 se0810003 sn ansk rg rden * 5654 0 19,9195 63,5161 se0810004 lidbergsgrottorna * 21 0 19,339 63,5511 se0810005 storrisbergsgrottorna * 21,6 0 19,3798 63,595 se0810007 l ngrumpskogen * 122,3 0 19,5544 63,6967 se0810008 hummelholm * 26,9 0 19,506 63,7243 se0810009 str mb ck-kont * 476,9 0 20,2278 63,6696 se0810010 holm arna * 24 209,6 0 20,8934 63,7028 se0810011 skeppsvikssk rg rden * 790,9 0 20,5872 63,7671 se0810015 balberget * 165,4 0 19,1203 63,9418 se0810016 bj rnlandets nationalpark * 1 620,2 0 18,0274 63,9778 se0810017 stockholmsgata (norra) * 120,3 0 17,8282 63,9088 se0810019 vallsj skogen * 73,9 0 16,2684 64,2585 se0810024 vindelforsarna 76,5 0 19,7041 64,2103 se0810025 hjuken sarna * 114,6 0 19,5809 64,3184 se0810027 v nnforsen * 35,7 0 19,9008 63,9922 se0810029 t relbr nnan * 45,9 0 20,452 63,9652 se0810031 ratask r * 93,2 0 20,9023 63,9907 se0810032 str msforsen * 27,1 0 20,8688 64,1456 se0810033 herts nger * 751,3 0 21,1262 64,2147 se0810034 bjur klubb * 954,8 0 21,5912 64,4543 se0810035 sk tgrunnan * 38,4 0 21,4968 64,5966 se0810036 kalkstenstj rn * 6,1 0 21,1685 64,7309 se0810037 f bodskogen * 9 0 20,6106 64,492 se0810039 vitbergen * 888,5 0 19,7193 64,625 se0810045 altarliden * 233,2 0 18,8179 64,7864 se0810051 alsberget * 1 728,8 0 17,6224 64,6695 se0810052 ristr skskogen * 14,4 0 17,4017 64,7386 se0810054 blaikfj llet * 34174 0 16,1144 64,6027 se0810056 oxfj llet * 1 667,9 0 15,4133 64,6651 se0810059 marsfj llet * 86 113,9 0 15,5647 65,1213 se0810062 skikkisj berget 7,9 0 16,5874 65,0096 se0810066 sandseleforsen * 114,4 0 17,6359 65,3172 se0810068 vindel-storforsen * 128,5 0 18,3457 65,0721 se0810069 f gelmyrk len * 90,9 0 19,0985 65,2478 se0810072 kryddgrovan * 1,8 0 19,5665 64,9804 se0810073 svansele damm ngar 96,5 0 19,8141 65,0128 se0810076 utstenarna * 25,3 0 21,1911 64,8543 se0810077 nalovardo * 4 947,2 0 17,516 65,6912 se0810080 vindelfj llen * 554 674,6 0 15,9676 65,9087 se0810081 str mfors * 76,5 0 18,9639 65,1193 se0810082 h llbergstr sk * 103,9 0 18,1961 65,1246 se0810083 sk rtr skberget * 26,2 0 19,4285 64,4317 se0810084 kojmyran * 94 0 16,856 63,9867 se0810085 b ckmyrkullen * 53,2 0 18,1664 64,0396 se0810086 kammen 39,8 0 19,4546 64,4458 se0810088 borup * 68,4 0 19,4157 65,007 se0810089 buberget * 2 291,2 0 17,5071 64,8696 se0810090 tj derberget * 1 108,7 0 19,0115 64,4588 se0810091 lilla stutvattnet * 116,6 0 18,2013 64,1516 se0810092 vammasj n * 91,2 0 17,9681 64,2038 se0810093 skalberget * 103,8 0 17,8751 64,1598 se0810094 degerforsheden * 134,2 0 21,3333 65,1082 se0810095 stora villotr sk * 395,8 0 17,8412 65,0638 se0810096 stenbith jden * 1688 0 16,8977 64,0368 se0810097 storsele * 91,8 0 18,9174 65,1934 se0810098 krycklan * 24,5 0 19,8434 64,2128 se0810099 liksgelisen * 251,2 0 17,2507 65,6037 se0810100 gimegolts * 19,2 0 17,7463 65,5824 se0810101 tj rnbergsheden * 96,7 0 20,7352 64,6095 se0810323 m rdselforsen * 419,6 0 19,2337 64,6739 se0810324 br namyran * 40,3 0 18,6657 64,2594 se0810325 norravasund * 26,7 0 18,9012 65,1426 se0810326 bj rnberget i skellefte * 64,1 0 19,4974 64,7094 se0810327 sodoberg * 39,5 0 18,7359 65,3017 se0810328 granliden * 67,4 0 18,2097 65,4863 se0810329 lillberget * 83 0 19,0158 64,3161 se0810330 stavaliden * 66,9 0 19,4911 64,5697 se0810331 nordansj berget * 65 0 17,832 64,1139 se0810332 kn sarna * 28,3 0 18,901 64,8706 se0810333 mtr skberget * 46,7 0 18,7689 64,7598 se0810334 r vliden * 56,1 0 18,4594 65,0513 se0810335 lilltr sket * 31,2 0 19,3529 64,9343 se0810336 br nnliden * 92,5 0 20,4318 65,2568 se0810337 ava s * 57,6 0 18,5062 65,2804 se0810338 sk lliden * 46,4 0 17,6734 65,561 se0810339 bocksberget * 75,9 0 18,8635 64,546 se0810340 br naberget * 33,8 0 17,1926 65,5852 se0810341 kluddbr nnan * 51,8 0 19,8627 64,2207 se0810342 deger stormyr * 137,1 0 19,5724 64,1776 se0810344 s rliden * 123,6 0 19,3022 64,7626 se0810345 r dberget i sele * 38,2 0 17,0501 64,2783 se0810346 arksj berget * 1 054,7 0 15,633 64,6931 se0810348 l jtavare * 269,5 0 15,8045 64,4854 se0810349 bj rnberget i vilhelmina * 1 330,6 0 16,6591 64,8274 se0810351 ullisjaure * 853,5 0 16,4533 65,2307 se0810353 skikki * 449,6 0 16,5485 65,0337 se0810354 r nnberget * 233,4 0 16,6606 65,1644 se0810357 mal -storforsen * 69,3 0 19,1358 65,0802 se0810358 br nnberget * 35,6 0 20,5 64,9123 se0810359 blylodmyran * 138,5 0 20,451 64,9316 se0810360 arasj * 4 636,2 0 17,6074 64,5781 se0810361 abborravan 12,9 0 18,868 64,8159 se0810362 tribladtj rn * 179,3 0 19,2892 64,0435 se0810364 tuggensele * 56,2 0 18,8172 64,4664 se0810365 ostn s * 857,7 0 20,6809 63,7975 se0810368 sm tj rnsl tten * 42,9 0 15,6647 64,532 se0810369 r rmyran, paulund * 14 0 17,9611 64,8695 se0810370 stockb cksmyran 2,1 0 18,1062 65,4289 se0810371 sandsele 6,1 0 17,6571 65,3061 se0810372 tjickutr skb cken * 8,2 0 17,6952 64,988 se0810373 kyrkbergstj rnen * 6,6 0 16,7626 65,308 se0810375 malgomajlandet * 66,2 0 16,2358 64,7795 se0810376 r rmyran, grankullt ngen 7,8 0 16,4356 64,7258 se0810378 lill-r rmyran * 10,7 0 19,564 64,9783 se0810379 stormyran, vilhelmina * 6,9 0 16,8052 64,5666 se0810380 hatt-stormyran * 6 0 19,626 65,2081 se0810381 vackermyran * 64,6 0 17,1753 64,5229 se0810382 fr mmermyrans k llkupoler * 25 0 17,2973 64,5276 se0810383 s rg rden * 7,6 0 17,2538 64,605 se0810384 kullmyrb cken * 36,2 0 17,3274 64,7606 se0810387 osttj rnb cken * 70,5 0 19,6153 64,2129 se0810388 v stermark * 303,7 0 20,1821 64,2674 se0810389 nedre lais lven * 387,1 0 17,6513 65,6368 se0810390 bergmyran, ormsj * 2,2 0 15,9259 64,4037 se0810391 degermyrb cken * 3,8 0 19,2217 63,8537 se0810392 sjulsmyran * 681,1 0 20,6573 64,025 se0810399 vojmsj landet * 4 883,2 0 16,319 64,9767 se0810400 rismyran * 169,7 0 18,7498 65,2403 se0810401 smalaken * 652,6 0 17,8828 65,4817 se0810402 vittr sket 196,3 0 19,6629 64,693 se0810403 brattf llan * 3,8 0 19,2071 63,8563 se0810404 degermyran * 4,9 0 19,2156 63,8381 se0810405 skr mtr sk * 5,6 0 20,5793 64,6348 se0810406 nordvalls gransumpskog * 1,7 0 19,4786 64,0733 se0810407 r jtingssundet * 6,8 0 21,4511 64,5407 se0810408 br nsn sviken 2,8 0 21,4286 64,534 se0810409 l ngstranden 9,2 0 21,42 64,5318 se0810411 l vberget, lycksele 3,3 0 18,5673 64,4514 se0810412 v stra h gkulla 1,1 0 18,9848 65,0072 se0810413 ol-ersaberget * 2,1 0 19,3606 65,0393 se0810414 borup baksidan * 2,9 0 19,3832 65,0077 se0810415 v stra finnliden * 3,2 0 19,4688 65,0405 se0810416 stra finnliden * 2,1 0 19,4815 65,0358 se0810417 k lberget 1,3 0 20,3552 64,9539 se0810418 nymyrliden 2,7 0 20,3699 64,9464 se0810419 israelsmyran 3,5 0 20,3669 64,9508 se0810420 sp rrmyrberget 2,3 0 20,3814 64,9499 se0810421 s dra petiktr sk 0,74 0 19,7995 65,0521 se0810422 norra petiktr sk * 1,2 0 19,7811 65,0691 se0810423 lund * 0,84 0 20,3799 65,0871 se0810424 ribbfors * 2,3 0 20,4326 65,23 se0810425 selet * 2 0 20,4532 65,224 se0810426 rabnab cken * 12,8 0 17,0925 65,6581 se0810427 akerstr sket 3,4 0 17,3827 65,6171 se0810428 junnesvare * 7,7 0 17,4072 65,5619 se0810429 ersmarksberget * 20,4 0 20,2833 63,8799 se0810430 f llfors 1,1 0 19,6712 63,9816 se0810431 storsand * 4,9 0 21,4319 64,5376 se0810433 l gde lven 7 276,7 0 18,4636 64,0841 se0810434 re lven 9 927,6 0 18,6084 64,2722 se0810435 vindel lven 58 496,7 0 18,397 65,0467 se0810436 s var n * 8 397,9 0 20,0299 64,3563 se0810437 byske lven 3 080,2 0 20,287 65,209 se0810438 by lven 564,9 0 21,133 65,1201 se0810440 k gefj rdens havsstrand ngar * 38,1 0 21,0549 64,8513 se0810441 skall n * 371,2 0 21,4442 64,567 se0810444 b skbacken * 11,3 0 19,2991 65,1951 se0810445 brattby 25,7 0 19,893 63,8955 se0810446 torsmyran * 833,9 0 19,6028 63,6038 se0810447 h lvattsmyrorna * 172,4 0 20,163 64,2038 se0810448 j ttungsmyran * 838,3 0 20,0452 64,592 se0810449 brandb rsberget * 103,7 0 17,1903 64,2203 se0810450 m nsberget * 133,4 0 16,0854 64,4048 se0810451 degerliden * 30,5 0 20,3072 64,5052 se0810452 n suddsberget * 95,8 0 18,834 65,1967 se0810453 killingsanden * 7,9 0 21,0376 64,1775 se0810454 verbo * 9,2 0 18,8729 64,5105 se0810455 g rdefj rden 362,1 0 21,3241 64,3817 se0810456 klubben-rickle n * 87,1 0 20,9523 64,081 se0810457 v gtr sk * 13,4 0 18,9939 65,3183 se0810458 forsbergsbr nnan * 6,3 0 19,1721 65,0914 se0810459 lomselet * 14,5 0 18,879 65,1415 se0810460 rusklidtj rn * 24,6 0 18,6928 64,7954 se0810461 fj llheden * 9,7 0 18,6924 64,1501 se0810462 r lidkn sen * 11,9 0 18,7869 64,6806 se0810463 orrliden * 17,9 0 18,3187 64,6533 se0810464 k taberget * 11,6 0 18,8079 64,8358 se0810465 b lforsen * 31,5 0 18,4917 64,6563 se0810466 kittelforsheden 4,8 0 18,6048 64,9495 se0810467 trollberget * 9,2 0 18,6656 64,8118 se0810468 nymyrtj rnheden * 12,2 0 19,8573 65,1455 se0810469 granlidtj rn * 16,5 0 19,5224 64,7022 se0810470 holmtr skberget * 7,2 0 17,3543 65,0186 se0810471 djupvik 44 0 19,4209 64,481 se0810472 j rptj rn * 19,3 0 19,2728 64,4724 se0810473 j rvtj rn * 13,4 0 19,2574 64,2206 se0810474 br nntj len * 28,9 0 19,9758 64,3393 se0810476 siksj * 14,4 0 17,7913 64,3501 se0810477 rismyrbr net * 14,6 0 20,4088 63,9285 se0810478 s rforsskogen * 42,6 0 19,1605 64,0546 se0810479 risberget * 10,1 0 19,7597 64,2993 se0810480 dagl sten * 34,5 0 21,1941 64,5035 se0810481 storbacken * 17,3 0 18,6828 64,5168 se0810483 s rforsdammen 20,8 0 20,0398 63,8502 se0810484 tmyrberget 34 792,1 0 19,1601 64,2222 se0810486 kl ppmyran * 24,5 0 16,4367 64,8037 se0810487 paub cken 792,6 0 17,7739 64,8143 se0810489 valfrid paulsson-reservatet * 33,6 0 19,456 64,4142 se0810491 ume lvens delta * 2 005,7 0 20,332 63,7357 se0810492 orrb le * 8,3 0 19,6624 63,9939 se0810495 bjurselliden * 40,7 0 19,7314 64,9072 se0810496 br nntr sk * 80,1 0 19,0943 65,2067 se0810497 dyngstomberget * 163 0 19,0561 64,0931 se0810498 fj lbyn * 27,4 0 21,4803 64,417 se0810499 flintb cken * 54,2 0 19,6851 64,8926 se0810500 isklinten * 232,5 0 20,0998 64,2758 se0810501 gr tanberget * 2 284,5 0 16,5293 64,9859 se0810502 sjulsberget * 702,9 0 16,8696 64,8718 se0810503 gransj myrarna * 7 048,6 0 17,4853 64,5822 se0810504 labbetmyrlandet * 1 642,1 0 16,8916 65,657 se0810510 b ckn s 1,1 0 17,9488 64,8515 se0810512 gig n * 272,4 0 17,5885 64,2814 se0810513 njakafj ll * 6 193,4 0 15,6662 64,9632 se0810514 tallsj berget * 1 138,9 0 17,5777 64,4628 se0810515 stor-rotliden * 345,4 0 18,412 64,2269 se0810516 ring skullen * 166,3 0 17,0571 64,2527 se0810517 blakliden * 131,2 0 18,1635 64,0224 se0810518 tavlefj rden * 125,7 0 20,4127 63,7809 se0810519 sydostbrotten 4 337,4 0 20,1229 63,3922 se0820004 stor-r bben * 4 183,4 0 21,8803 65,1864 se0820007 jan-svensam ssan * 91,8 0 18,5663 65,6142 se0820008 vittj kk-akkan lke * 4 209,7 0 19,0176 65,5358 se0820009 stinttj rn * 45,9 0 18,8311 65,7107 se0820010 d ttren ive * 249,6 0 18,7493 65,7393 se0820011 pellob cken * 20,2 0 19,4248 65,3503 se0820013 bergmyrberget * 22 0 19,3727 65,519 se0820015 luobbalheden * 79 0 19,876 65,4156 se0820019 norrdal * 41,8 0 20,0335 65,5029 se0820020 hedvallen * 71,7 0 19,2777 65,6803 se0820021 gaddaberget * 392,6 0 20,0162 65,7206 se0820022 haraliden * 336,1 0 20,1236 65,4326 se0820023 lillfl tuberget * 79,7 0 20,5463 65,3775 se0820024 svartliden * 70,7 0 20,7095 65,3701 se0820025 rokliden * 26,2 0 20,9163 65,326 se0820027 nakteberget * 360,9 0 20,2037 65,6351 se0820028 rackberget * 54,4 0 21,0584 65,6825 se0820035 r dkallen-s r spen * 7 087,8 0 22,4192 65,3598 se0820042 gammelstadsviken * 440,2 0 22,0803 65,6318 se0820049 lapp n * 55 0 22,5584 65,6052 se0820051 selets bruk 23,7 0 21,6709 65,6599 se0820052 sten kern * 44,5 0 22,2272 65,5266 se0820056 laisdalens fj llurskog * 72 629,2 0 16,9531 66,0986 se0820061 veddek * 6 086,3 0 17,3117 65,9697 se0820063 akkelis * 5 580,9 0 17,5736 66,1474 se0820065 granberget-kuottavare * 88,4 0 18,2357 65,9415 se0820066 bj rkn s * 56,6 0 18,413 65,9383 se0820067 fettj rn * 48,5 0 18,4923 65,9257 se0820069 nimtek * 4 558,8 0 18,4763 65,9812 se0820070 rak ive * 933,6 0 17,4508 65,9029 se0820071 lehatt * 147,3 0 18,6176 65,9925 se0820074 st kke-b rg fj llurskog * 22050 0 18,318 66,1998 se0820075 reivo * 9 715,6 0 19,1177 65,8154 se0820077 nilasj kk * 141,9 0 19,123 66,0131 se0820078 kimkatj kko * 13,7 0 19,2068 65,9668 se0820079 lomtr skvattnet * 22,9 0 19,7198 65,761 se0820080 svantr sk * 222,5 0 20,2168 66,0675 se0820082 suorke * 4,7 0 19,8526 66,0175 se0820083 vitberget * 628,8 0 20,3215 65,9756 se0820084 tr sket * 50 0 20,2943 65,7884 se0820085 storberget * 24,1 0 20,4496 65,8055 se0820086 storforsen * 127,2 0 20,403 65,8493 se0820087 solberget * 73,4 0 20,2687 66,0311 se0820089 l ngtr skberget * 59,7 0 20,5347 65,9364 se0820090 kerby 1,9 0 21,2089 65,9563 se0820092 storhuvudet * 698,1 0 21,5183 65,9459 se0820093 gjutberget * 93,3 0 21,8872 65,7785 se0820095 sn berget * 416,3 0 21,9482 65,9863 se0820104 eriks ren-svartholmen * 22,9 0 22,8539 65,7238 se0820108 haparanda sk rg rd * 7 430,5 0 23,7696 65,6049 se0820110 marabacken-notvikr * 13,2 0 23,5333 65,8422 se0820111 k ll- och mj tr sken * 179,8 0 23,5805 65,8502 se0820123 hornavan-s dvajaure fj llurskog * 80 410,4 0 17,255 66,4221 se0820124 tjeggelvas * 32 810,2 0 17,7822 66,5424 se0820126 l ngsj n-g brek fj llurskog * 7 266,2 0 18,3939 66,3524 se0820129 daita * 40 0 18,7642 66,2501 se0820130 udtja * 146 491,7 0 19,1045 66,3632 se0820131 kronog rd * 5 148,5 0 19,7003 66,2705 se0820132 kuoratsvare * 15,8 0 19,9728 66,3127 se0820134 luott ive * 2 212,4 0 19,9769 66,3687 se0820137 s kevaratj * 7 200,4 0 19,4412 66,4856 se0820138 suobbat ive-jutsavare * 1 977,9 0 19,9352 66,4889 se0820145 vuotnaberget * 18,7 0 20,7864 66,5131 se0820146 bl k len * 636,8 0 21,6269 66,3095 se0820149 muggtr sk * 420,7 0 22,2231 66,3261 se0820150 h llberget * 120 0 22,1426 66,3737 se0820151 granberget * 140,4 0 22,5206 66,2601 se0820152 armasj rvimyren * 68,8 0 23,5559 66,2972 se0820153 iso-kuusivaara * 52 0 23,2783 66,3832 se0820156 p rl lvens fj llurskog * 115 725,8 0 18,2002 66,7584 se0820159 mellersta h llberget * 21 0 23,0385 66,5277 se0820160 isovaara * 219 0 23,629 66,3762 se0820167 muddus * 50 223,6 0 20,1975 66,9139 se0820170 kuolpaj rvi * 76,4 0 20,6188 67,0223 se0820176 linkkarova * 27,4 0 22,1228 66,8145 se0820179 paskatieva * 24,6 0 22,4821 66,6368 se0820180 linalinkka * 12,9 0 22,1522 66,8144 se0820186 ultevis fj llurskog * 117 203,3 0 18,9818 67,0774 se0820189 ligga * 429,4 0 20,0993 66,7071 se0820193 stubba * 33 286,3 0 20,0292 67,098 se0820194 rumppunen * 216,9 0 22,4868 66,8167 se0820195 turpas * 48,1 0 22,588 66,7007 se0820196 vinsanlehto * 88,4 0 22,585 66,8713 se0820197 kuusivaara * 1514 0 23,3009 66,6714 se0820199 pellokielas * 208,1 0 21,315 66,6005 se0820200 svartberget * 817,1 0 22,5166 66,6693 se0820209 lina fj llurskog * 98 049,7 0 20,4573 67,3621 se0820211 dundret * 5 160,5 0 20,5654 67,0938 se0820212 jerttalompolo * 73,6 0 21,356 67,079 se0820214 puolva * 867 0 21,3706 67,41 se0820221 tunturit * 11 962,4 0 21,8432 67,2138 se0820222 jylkkyvaara * 857 0 22,0638 67,4023 se0820223 masugnsbyn * 55,9 0 22,0798 67,4481 se0820230 suorsapakka * 360,1 0 22,9543 67,1488 se0820231 jupukka * 82,7 0 23,2358 67,2743 se0820243 rautas * 81 694,2 0 19,9368 68,0166 se0820244 sautusvaara * 1 832,7 0 20,8338 67,888 se0820251 rautusakara * 1 133,2 0 21,0978 67,8603 se0820259 ruohojoki * 35,8 0 22,5402 67,6167 se0820263 kursunkangas * 71,3 0 22,8431 67,5618 se0820280 s rkitievat * 522,3 0 23,1932 68,0628 se0820282 tornetr sk-soppero fj llurskog * 336 897,8 0 21,0498 68,1398 se0820287 pessinki fj llurskog * 97 225,3 0 22,7007 68,0108 se0820297 kaltisb cken * 310,8 0 20,4121 66,6953 se0820298 granlandet * 27 150,8 0 21,5609 66,6005 se0820299 s ivisn s * 108,3 0 23,5645 65,79 se0820300 bj rn * 339,2 0 23,5819 65,7542 se0820301 trutsk r * 67,6 0 23,1895 65,7238 se0820302 granholmen * 101,2 0 22,9765 65,6782 se0820303 liksk r * 2 508,7 0 23,0096 65,6399 se0820304 b dan * 1 854,3 0 22,2251 65,3957 se0820305 liksk ret * 186,6 0 22,3759 65,5186 se0820306 kluntarna * 713,6 0 22,6131 65,4618 se0820307 norr- spen * 581,6 0 22,5116 65,408 se0820309 hals ren * 36,6 0 21,7195 65,3674 se0820310 torne-fur * 218,9 0 24,0585 65,7451 se0820312 skags-furuholmen * 62,6 0 22,7221 65,7763 se0820313 b t fj rden * 930,4 0 22,8205 65,676 se0820314 harufj rden * 2 710,5 0 22,7663 65,6269 se0820316 massan * 50,8 0 23,2994 65,7369 se0820317 furuholmen * 34,4 0 22,289 65,5047 se0820320 haparanda sandsk r * 998,7 0 23,9072 65,596 se0820321 riekkola-v livaara * 95,2 0 24,1273 65,8175 se0820322 sik ren * 170,9 0 22,6398 65,7728 se0820323 berg fj rden * 751,3 0 22,7115 65,7097 se0820324 h stholmen * 32,2 0 22,283 65,4899 se0820327 kalix yttre sk rg rd * 9 296,4 0 23,3931 65,6837 se0820329 patta peken * 1 891,6 0 21,943 65,3082 se0820330 varg draget * 353,7 0 21,7163 65,2494 se0820332 holster rarna * 140,3 0 22,7194 65,7556 se0820333 tervajoki * 75,8 0 23,1255 67,3483 se0820335 stora v nsberget * 567,4 0 22,1481 66,5015 se0820336 vaimisberget * 54,9 0 22,7281 66,3108 se0820337 ranesvare * 3 776,3 0 20,7639 66,6691 se0820340 manalainen * 732,1 0 23,0575 67,6393 se0820400 vasikkavuoma * 199,5 0 23,1982 67,2274 se0820403 ytterberget * 5,7 0 22,7806 66,5212 se0820404 rislandet * 3,2 0 22,0486 66,7043 se0820405 p j rvi * 7,2 0 23,4993 67,0128 se0820406 annelund * 5,7 0 20,7112 66,3387 se0820407 bj ssberget * 3,1 0 21,6768 65,7518 se0820408 br nntj rn * 0,77 0 21,0085 65,6069 se0820409 paloj rvi * 3,9 0 23,8631 65,8225 se0820410 hukkaj rvi * 3 0 23,12 66,3257 se0820411 kanisberget 1,1 0 20,9282 65,6424 se0820412 karijoki 2,7 0 22,6537 66,8052 se0820413 stortj rnen * 1,8 0 20,9127 65,7 se0820414 n smyran * 4 0 22,9799 65,79 se0820415 palo-tervasvaara * 3,3 0 21,0332 67,5521 se0820416 s rbyn 5,3 0 21,6636 66,0537 se0820417 understberget * 4,8 0 21,5836 65,7878 se0820418 sterby * 4 0 21,0527 66,017 se0820419 klus n * 2,4 0 20,8055 66,12 se0820420 k lsberget * 3,3 0 21,0702 65,6376 se0820421 lapptr sket * 3,1 0 19,6279 65,31 se0820430 torne och kalix lvsystem 176 092,3 0 20,9884 67,7214 se0820431 r ne lven 15 633,6 0 21,5402 66,2782 se0820432 byske lven 16 772,2 0 19,1829 65,6172 se0820433 by lven 7 140,9 0 19,901 65,5806 se0820434 pite lven 52486 0 18,9306 66,1821 se0820450 backen * 0,5 0 21,5208 65,5149 se0820452 skrakah llan * 1,4 0 22,6192 65,587 se0820454 persbacka 1,4 0 20,2093 66,5475 se0820455 abborrtr sk 4,7 0 20,3466 67,0856 se0820456 skatabryggan * 23,1 0 22,2444 65,6317 se0820457 forshed 1,1 0 22,1894 66,1659 se0820458 kuldholmen 7,1 0 22,8433 66,3599 se0820461 ruokoj rvi * 3,7 0 22,2235 67,3271 se0820462 hanhinvittikko 2,5 0 23,4817 66,451 se0820463 k llg rden * 9,3 0 21,9836 65,8202 se0820465 sk ret 7,2 0 21,8038 65,5381 se0820466 livi joki 1,3 0 23,1084 67,2331 se0820467 maalari * 1,9 0 23,1714 67,2531 se0820468 fligget 1,4 0 21,7498 66,175 se0820470 pyr e noja * 3,7 0 23,6405 67,3555 se0820471 heikkamavuoma 21 0 21,23 67,3306 se0820555 tolikheden-karkberget * 196,7 0 20,9513 66,4124 se0820613 lustg rden * 287,7 0 21,426 65,5493 se0820614 stormyran * 1 988,5 0 20,3502 66,0539 se0820615 rappomyran * 3 030,9 0 20,9494 66,3736 se0820616 p iv vuoma * 2 758,8 0 21,194 66,6521 se0820617 v nnij nkk * 948,2 0 23,2055 67,3114 se0820618 tervavuoma * 5771 0 22,8767 67,4484 se0820624 alterberget * 49,7 0 21,9745 65,5732 se0820626 renskinnsk len * 107,2 0 21,6757 66,0245 se0820627 forstj rnberget * 82,1 0 21,2408 65,541 se0820628 h lltr skskogen * 8,2 0 21,397 65,5879 se0820629 bond fj rden * 2 955,8 0 21,695 65,1399 se0820631 varg n * 1 493,5 0 21,7882 65,2708 se0820701 storgrundet * 12 0 22,6352 65,9034 se0820702 s ivis 0,26 0 23,6737 65,8325 se0820703 kraaseli-selk kari * 6,7 0 24,1328 65,8053 se0820704 r nefj rden * 5 703,3 0 22,4288 65,8194 se0820705 tetberget * 5,8 0 21,6033 65,4289 se0820706 timmerberget * 3,8 0 21,9769 65,7706 se0820707 br nntr sket 3,3 0 23,5325 65,9602 se0820708 bombmurkleskogen * 20,7 0 20,3805 66,6513 se0820709 vuonoviken * 4 0 24,0353 65,8165 se0820710 kraaseli * 29,4 0 24,1069 65,7926 se0820711 svensbyfj rden 2,2 0 21,4018 65,314 se0820712 riekkola * 10,9 0 24,1139 65,8124 se0820713 haparanda hamn * 1,2 0 23,9043 65,7699 se0820715 kurkkionvuoma * 549,9 0 22,161 67,4132 se0820716 kahtovuoma * 471,3 0 23,4125 68,0297 se0820717 ripakaisenvuoma * 2 864,9 0 21,8604 67,8196 se0820718 stor n * 37,7 0 23,1308 65,7285 se0820719 aspberget * 392,9 0 20,5768 66,3117 se0820720 tapmokberget * 201,7 0 20,6777 66,3515 se0820721 bj rkberget * 257,3 0 20,2671 66,3831 se0820722 jelka-rimak bb * 37 671,7 0 19,5851 66,8931 se0820723 str kan sberget * 149,7 0 23,0096 65,8423 se0820724 mal ren * 181 0 23,5536 65,5252 se0820725 andersviksravinerna * 105 0 20,7189 66,405 se0820726 kuoukaravinerna s dra * 10,2 0 20,4976 66,5552 se0820727 kuoukaravinerna norra * 5,5 0 20,4912 66,5597 se0820728 g rje n 663,7 0 20,1715 66,4132 se0820729 floxen * 67,3 0 21,2236 65,563 se0820730 fogn stj rn 0,91 0 22,3274 65,876 se0820731 r vaberget * 6,1 0 22,3662 65,903 se0820732 timmerberget s dra * 3,6 0 21,9861 65,761 se0820733 finnberget * 4,2 0 23,5829 65,8034 se0820734 sarvenkataja * 67,2 0 24,144 65,6205 se0820735 stora hepokari * 185,2 0 24,0301 65,6076 se0820736 urstj rnb cken * 1 063,1 0 20,9077 66,0081 se0820737 lais lven 11 063,9 0 16,7981 66,1347 se0820740 gallejaur * 14,6 0 19,4762 65,1859 se0820741 austi 37 0 24,1379 65,6802 se0820742 ensk r 41,9 0 23,9812 65,6609 se0820743 huitori 87,6 0 24,0667 65,6341 se0820744 kataja 65,7 0 24,1515 65,7064 se0820745 klaus 12,9 0 24,1139 65,7179 se0820746 stora hamnsk r 30,3 0 24,1142 65,7001 se0820747 tantamanni 43,2 0 23,9108 65,6076 se0820748 tervaletto 42,4 0 24,0965 65,681 se0820749 t yr 16,5 0 24,0445 65,611 se0820750 im 15,8 0 24,0284 65,6682 se0820751 marakallen 5 983,5 0 22,5761 65,2554

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/16 of 14 december 2018 adopting the tenth update of the list of sites of community importance for the pannonian biogeographical region (notified under document c(2018) 8523) type: decision_impl subject matter: europe; natural environment; environmental policy date published: 2019-01-09 9.1.2019 en official journal of the european union l 7/5 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/16 of 14 december 2018 adopting the tenth update of the list of sites of community importance for the pannonian biogeographical region (notified under document c(2018) 8523) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to council directive 92/43/eec of 21 may 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of article 4(2) thereof, whereas: (1) the pannonian biogeographical region referred to in article 1(c)(iii) of directive 92/43/eec comprises parts of the union territories of the czech republic, romania and slovakia and the union territory of hungary, as specified in the biogeographical map approved on 20 april 2005 by the committee set up by article 20 of that directive (the habitats committee). (2) the initial list of sites of community importance for the pannonian biogeographical region, within the meaning of directive 92/43/eec, was adopted by commission decision 2008/26/ec (2). that list was last updated by commission implementing decision (eu) 2018/38 (3). (3) the sites included in the list of sites of community importance for the pannonian biogeographical region form part of natura 2000 network which is an essential element of protection of biodiversity in the union. in order to make further progress in the actual establishment of the natura 2000 network and in the context of a dynamic adaptation of that network, the lists of sites of community importance are reviewed regularly. (4) between 19 june 2017 and 2 march 2018 member states have proposed additional sites of community importance for the pannonian biogeographical region within the meaning of article 1 of directive 92/43/eec. member states have also submitted changes in the site-related information contained in the list of sites of community importance for the pannonian biogeographical region. (5) on the basis of the draft list drawn up by the commission in agreement with each of the member states concerned, which also identifies sites hosting priority natural habitat types or priority species, an updated list of sites selected as sites of community importance for the pannonian biogeographical region should be adopted. articles 4(4) and 6 of directive 92/43/eec apply to the newly included sites. (6) knowledge of the existence and distribution of the natural habitat types and species is constantly evolving as a result of the surveillance undertaken in accordance with article 11 of directive 92/43/eec. therefore, the evaluation and selection of sites at union level was carried out using the best available information at the time. (7) certain member states have not proposed sufficient sites to meet the requirements of directive 92/43/eec for certain habitat types and species. furthermore, knowledge of the existence and distribution of some natural habitat types listed in annex i and some of the species listed in annex ii to directive 92/43/eec remains incomplete. for those habitat types and species it can therefore not be concluded that the natura 2000 network is complete. (8) in the interests of clarity and transparency, implementing decision (eu) 2018/38 should be repealed. (9) the measures provided for in this decision are in accordance with the opinion of the habitats committee, has adopted this decision: article 1 the tenth update of the list of sites of community importance for the pannonian biogeographical region as set out in the annex is adopted. article 2 implementing decision (eu) 2018/38 is repealed. article 3 this decision is addressed to the member states. done at brussels, 14 december 2018. for the commission karmenu vella member of the commission (1) oj l 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7. (2) commission decision 2008/26/ec of 13 november 2007 adopting, pursuant to council directive 92/43/eec, the list of sites of community importance for the pannonian biogeographical region (oj l 12, 15.1.2008, p. 678). (3) commission implementing decision (eu) 2018/38 of 12 december 2017 adopting the ninth update of the list of sites of community importance for the pannonian biogeographical region (oj l 15, 19.1.2018, p. 98). annex tenth update of the list of sites of community importance for the pannonian biogeographical region each site of community importance (sci) is identified by the information supplied in the natura 2000 format, including the corresponding map. this information has been transmitted by the competent national authorities in accordance with the second subparagraph of article 4(1) of directive 92/43/eec. the table below gives the following information: a : sci code comprising nine characters, the first two being the iso code for the member state; b : name of sci; c : * = presence on the sci of at least one priority natural habitat type and/or species within the meaning of article 1 of directive 92/43/eec; d : area of sci in hectares or length of sci in km; e : geographical coordinates of sci (latitude and longitude) in decimal degrees. all the information given in the union list below is based on the data proposed, transmitted and validated by the czech republic, hungary, romania and slovakia. a b c d e sci code name of sci * area of sci (ha) length of sci (km) geographical coordinates of sci longitude latitude cz0620001 bezourek * 2,086 16,550278 49,091667 cz0620002 lupy * 17,979 16,950556 49,149167 cz0620003 dyjsk svahy 7,7758 16,121667 48,838889 cz0620004 fl dnitzsk v esovi t * 5,531 15,9825 48,805556 cz0620005 hochberk * 35,0285 16,673333 48,940556 cz0620006 kamen ky * 6,6157 16,678611 48,738056 cz0620007 kamenn hora u derflic 8,3531 16,151667 48,814722 cz0620008 kl nky * 4,3725 16,779444 48,933611 cz0620009 lednick rybn ky 617,8305 16,721389 48,772778 cz0620010 mod ick rameno 6,3526 16,62 49,135278 cz0620011 nov hory * 11,5934 16,634444 49,046667 cz0620013 pod ibeni n m kopcem * 3,5632 16,148889 48,953056 cz0620014 p edn kopaniny * 8,8987 16,742778 48,956667 cz0620016 ra ovick zlom chobot * 12,9313 16,930833 49,125833 cz0620017 stra * 3,254 16,812778 48,936667 cz0620018 v trn ky * 32,3536 16,980278 49,195833 cz0620024 v t p sky * 63,432 17,253889 48,919444 cz0620031 slanisko dobr pole * 3,696 16,531667 48,822222 cz0620037 sivick les * 236,5309 16,773056 49,218333 cz0620048 skalky u sedlece * 58,792 16,677222 48,770556 cz0620049 pav kopec * 3,7723 16,693333 48,763611 cz0620051 lapanick slepence * 8,291 16,721111 49,172222 cz0620055 vrbick h jek * 115,3909 16,914722 48,915 cz0620056 v rovick kopce 16,0041 16,115 48,925833 cz0620073 bzeneck st elnice 28,7441 17,271111 48,955833 cz0620076 z dla u nesva ilky * 4,6784 16,770833 49,080278 cz0620078 jezero 9,5448 17,178611 48,951389 cz0620084 vranovick a pla k v les * 293,507 16,607778 48,948333 cz0620103 v te ovsk vrchovina * 496,3278 17,049167 49,024167 cz0620147 miroslavsk kopce * 30,8328 16,300833 48,93 cz0620154 na eratick kopec 127,1258 16,099167 48,832222 cz0620158 rumunsk ba antnice * 90,3571 16,693889 49,033333 cz0620162 je meni t * 61,7722 16,136389 48,753889 cz0620169 och zky ned nov * 472,312 16,835833 48,985556 cz0620177 kap nsko * 706,2934 17,011667 48,88 cz0620181 valtrovick luh * 66,921 16,2175 48,7975 cz0620187 slanisko novosedly * 2,085 16,497778 48,839444 cz0620416 jaroslavick komory 0,9766 16,240833 48,761944 cz0620417 kobylsk sk la * 6,8696 16,923611 48,943611 cz0620418 hlubok louky 7,9017 16,031111 48,787778 cz0620419 na adamc ch * 15,0601 17 49,006667 cz0622007 horky u milotic 18,8863 17,134444 48,944444 cz0622009 hovoransk louky * 10,0038 16,973056 48,965278 cz0622017 louky pod kumst tem 7,3943 16,923056 48,993611 cz0622026 trkmansk louky 19,0259 16,835833 48,858333 cz0622037 trkmanec rybn ky 44,3319 16,844167 48,865278 cz0622167 eb t n 1,4971 16,443889 49,0825 cz0622168 mu enice 14,3972 16,941667 49,116944 cz0622169 na kocourk ch 2,9895 16,249722 48,998889 cz0622181 erven str n * 4,7212 16,418056 49,075 cz0622218 dunajovick kopce * 87,7857 16,554167 48,851944 cz0622219 z pov u karl na 1,7673 16,968333 48,970833 cz0622221 t p novsk lom 1,0743 16,330556 48,9575 cz0622223 u kapli ky * 5,3966 16,2625 48,953889 cz0622224 u mich lka 1,348 16,359722 48,983889 cz0622227 volkramy 6,8547 16,929167 49,176944 cz0623003 b eclav kaple u n dra 0,0445 16,891944 48,754167 cz0623004 b e anka a b e ansk rybn k * 20,0124 16,3325 48,873333 cz0623010 hevl nsk jezero 9,3769 16,355278 48,764722 cz0623011 tasovick lom 11,0438 16,152778 48,821667 cz0623016 lednice z mek 0,9483 16,804722 48,801944 cz0623018 milotice leti t 26,9566 17,124722 48,98 cz0623019 oleksovick mok ina 43,9814 16,263333 48,925278 cz0623021 p se n rybn k 43,7838 17,153056 48,963333 cz0623022 pokran 9,4398 16,500833 48,849167 cz0623025 slavkovsk z meck park a aleje * 21,2649 16,864722 49,152778 cz0623026 stud nkov vrch 12,3099 16,721389 48,793056 cz0623027 umick rybn ky 49,0887 16,473056 48,981389 cz0623030 vrboveck rybn k 37,1132 16,131389 48,793056 cz0623031 vyp lenky 65,2914 17,323889 48,974722 cz0623032 idlochovick z meck park * 23,0984 16,610278 49,033056 cz0623034 znojmo kostel nalezen sv. k e 0,1686 16,051111 48,856389 cz0623035 b l kopec u ej e * 72,9589 16,968889 48,929722 cz0623040 hovoransk h jek 82,5564 17,026944 48,9375 cz0623041 jevi ovka 20,0942 16,230833 48,865556 cz0623045 rendezvous * 61,533 16,789444 48,749444 cz0623046 tr vn dv r * 325,8144 16,435833 48,791944 cz0623772 bo ick mok ad 8,8302 16,284167 48,837778 cz0623775 bu ovice z mek 0,3213 17,001111 49,149167 cz0623778 emin z me ek 0,1186 16,357222 48,828333 cz0623781 klentnice kostel svat ho ji 0,0211 16,644444 48,843611 cz0623782 rybni n z me ek 0,021 16,795833 48,784444 cz0623788 popice fara 0,0341 16,015278 48,821667 cz0623793 valsk rybn k 12,6068 16,712222 48,745556 cz0623797 str nicko 181,4488 17,2725 48,895 cz0623798 bo ick rybn ky * 57,4479 16,262222 48,826111 cz0623799 drnholeck luh 149,0862 16,477778 48,841667 cz0623800 kn ec les 11,3785 16,638333 49 cz0623801 p snotick les 10,7562 16,622778 49,009444 cz0623803 bezru ova alej * 5,071 16,778889 48,769444 cz0624001 meandry dyje 232,1792 16,18 48,808889 cz0624020 str nsk sk la * 15,5394 16,675556 49,190556 cz0624043 stolov hora * 77,1183 16,638889 48,841111 cz0624060 pouzd ansk step kolby * 177,421 16,639722 48,9475 cz0624062 erneck a milonick h jek * 204,0365 17,043333 49,15 cz0624064 krumlovsk les * 1 945,5222 16,376389 49,041944 cz0624068 str nick morava * 658,6114 17,278611 48,911111 cz0624070 hodon nsk doubrava * 3 029,0835 17,100556 48,8975 cz0624071 o ov * 287,827 17,166389 48,858056 cz0624072 ertoryje * 4 855,0568 17,392778 48,847778 cz0624096 podyj * 6 273,1347 15,896111 48,851667 cz0624097 vy 8,0822 16,9725 49,135278 cz0624098 turold 16,8382 16,639722 48,818611 cz0624099 niva dyje * 3 249,0428 16,801944 48,806667 cz0624100 milovick les * 2 443,2085 16,694167 48,823889 cz0624101 kunt nov * 661,458 16,849444 48,945 cz0624102 slanisko u nesytu * 9,7703 16,7 48,775556 cz0624103 mu ovsk luh * 557,4511 16,583611 48,916111 cz0624104 d v n * 406,3195 16,648333 48,869167 cz0624106 tvo ihr zsk les * 1 468,2272 16,113333 48,9025 cz0624108 zimarky * 3,0498 16,885278 48,875556 cz0624112 pice * 4,2886 16,769167 49,113056 cz0624114 p edn kout * 692,8327 16,776944 48,97 cz0624115 kamenn vrch u kurd jova * 104,642 16,746389 48,966389 cz0624116 pidl ky * 15,3668 16,96 48,920833 cz0624118 skalky u havran k 17,3283 16,011389 48,8025 cz0624119 soutok podlu * 9 713,6818 16,994722 48,723056 cz0624130 moravsk kras * 6 485,3704 16,724167 49,383889 cz0624234 svat kope ek u mikulova * 46,8923 16,650556 48,807778 cz0624236 ji n svahy h d * 29,8946 16,673333 49,218611 cz0624238 meandry jihlavy 76,8605 16,505556 49,040278 cz0723007 er k 4,2366 17,435556 49,069444 cz0723012 insel 0,4518 17,384167 49,019444 cz0723020 dol okluky 17,1855 17,454167 48,974167 cz0723024 rochus 57,9347 17,492778 49,075833 cz0724107 nedakonick les 1 524,7909 17,403333 49,027222 cz0724120 kn polsk les * 521,1706 17,500833 49,109444 huan20001 aggteleki-karszt s peremter letei * 23 103,73 0 20,6375 48,4806 huan20002 rakaca-v lgy s oldalv lgyei * 2 082,23 0 21,088889 48,4825 huan20003 b dva-v lgy s a sas-patak-v lgye * 2 695,23 0 20,860278 48,518889 huan20004 hern d-v lgy s saj l di-erd * 5 038,17 0 20,9908 48,1856 huan20005 szuha-v lgy * 1 039,08 0 20,543889 48,350833 huan20006 saj -v lgy * 2 074,77 0 20,661944 48,254444 huan21007 b zsva-patak * 832,25 0 21,440278 48,466111 huan21008 m di bomboly-b nya 7,94 0 21,308056 48,201944 huan21009 m di-kakas-hegy * 15,36 0 21,328611 48,188889 hubf20001 keleti-bakony * 22 650,16 0 18,106389 47,230833 hubf20002 papod s mikl d * 7 734,76 0 17,863333 47,174167 hubf20003 kab-hegy * 8 075,84 0 17,669444 47,040556 hubf20004 ag r-tet * 5 135,55 0 17,502222 46,958611 hubf20006 tihanyi-f lsziget * 773,72 0 17,855833 46,912778 hubf20007 monostorap ti fekete-hegy * 1 789,35 0 17,595833 46,923889 hubf20008 csat r-hegy s mikl s p l hegy * 1 607,02 0 17,818611 47,100278 hubf20009 devecseri sz ki-erd * 1 593,85 0 17,489167 47,144444 hubf20011 fels -nyir di-erd s meggyes-erd * 4 176,75 0 17,408333 47,031389 hubf20012 s sdi-r t * 393,45 0 17,59 46,8675 hubf20014 p cselyi medence * 866,53 0 17,754444 46,964444 hubf20015 marcal-medence * 4 886,79 0 17,231389 47,2025 hubf20016 reg-hegyi rivi ra * 1 206,66 0 17,782222 46,901111 hubf20017 k d rtai dolomitmez k * 793,45 0 17,993056 47,122778 hubf20018 megye-hegy * 242,83 0 18,008889 47,064444 hubf20020 szent gy rgy hegy * 72,07 0 17,447222 46,842778 hubf20021 p ti-hegy * 363,52 0 18,097778 47,159167 hubf20022 mogyor s-hegy * 199,3 0 18,030278 47,101667 hubf20023 hajm sk ri t r kcsap s * 901,16 0 18,068056 47,135833 hubf20024 berhidai l szv lgyek * 127,12 0 18,1333 47,0878 hubf20025 badacsony * 252,88 0 17,494722 46,803889 hubf20026 t tv zsonyi bogaras * 235,6 0 17,801667 47,048889 hubf20027 nemesv mosi sz r-hegy * 58,14 0 17,821944 47,055278 hubf20028 tapolcai-medence * 2 301,12 0 17,406111 46,833889 hubf20029 uzsai-erd * 2 719,76 0 17,340556 46,928889 hubf20031 szentkir lyszabadja 493,01 0 17,970278 47,078333 hubf20032 balatonkenesei t torj nos 6,75 0 18,093056 47,036944 hubf20033 d r gdi-medence * 899,96 0 17,559722 46,999722 hubf20034 balatonf redi-erd * 3 489,62 0 17,885278 46,998333 hubf20035 keszthelyi-hegys g * 14 898,12 0 17,265556 46,854722 hubf20037 als -zala-v lgy * 6 551,86 0 17,1108 46,8281 hubf20039 nyugat-g csej * 4 524,6 0 16,525556 46,780556 hubf20040 v tyempuszta * 4 141,09 0 16,634722 46,543611 hubf20043 mura mente * 2 145,4 0 16,733056 46,4025 hubf20044 kerka mente * 7 340,78 0 16,546667 46,634444 hubf20045 sz v z princip lis-csatorna * 8 019,37 0 16,972778 46,595 hubf20046 olt rc * 8 961,44 0 16,854444 46,563056 hubf20047 fels -zala-v lgy * 1 109,89 0 16,788889 46,859722 hubf20048 kebele * 1 925,29 0 16,459444 46,633333 hubf20049 d l-zalai homokvid k (nagykanizsa) * 2 908,77 0 16,936667 46,438889 hubf20050 cs rnyeberek (zalakom r) * 2 133,54 0 17,17 46,478333 hubf20052 s rv z-patak mente * 1 186,05 0 16,861667 46,936667 hubf20053 zalaegerszegi cs csi erd * 1 129,51 0 16,904167 46,820278 hubf20054 nagykapornaki-erd 638,11 0 16,966389 46,844722 hubf20055 remetekert * 971,81 0 17,025 46,806667 hubf30001 szaki-bakony * 25 779,4 0 17,7492 47,2597 hubf30002 balaton * 59 483,11 0 17,825 46,88 hubf30003 kis-balaton * 13 344,2 0 17,1983 46,6311 hubn20001 b kk-fenns k s a l k-v lgy * 14 382,6 0 20,5075 48,071944 hubn20002 h r-v lgy, d li-b kk * 5 520,15 0 20,571111 48,004167 hubn20004 szarvask * 631,82 0 20,334444 47,995278 hubn20005 kisgy ri sottfa-tet cs k s-v lgy * 2 424,19 0 20,671667 48,034444 hubn20006 miskolctapolcai tat r- rok v r s-b rc * 537,46 0 20,689722 48,070278 hubn20007 kisgy ri halom-v r-csincse-v lgy cseh-v lgy * 1 000,89 0 20,708611 47,994167 hubn20008 v r-hegy nagy-eged * 2 036,55 0 20,4319 47,9531 hubn20009 tard k rny ki erd ssztyepp * 461,84 0 20,589722 47,908333 hubn20010 szomolyai kapt r-r t * 76,85 0 20,476111 47,881944 hubn20011 ostoros-patak menti erd spuszta * 48,86 0 20,470556 47,832778 hubn20012 egerbakta b tor k rny ki erd k * 2 629,82 0 20,277778 47,959722 hubn20013 hevesaranyosi-fed mesi dombvid k * 1 238,04 0 20,207222 48,006389 hubn20014 gyepes-v lgy * 3 012,77 0 20,187222 48,128889 hubn20015 izra-v lgy s az arl i-t * 1 349,12 0 20,289444 48,147222 hubn20017 borsodb tai kotyind -tet 297,5 0 20,390556 48,206111 hubn20018 upponyi-szoros * 1 289,761 0 20,453056 48,200833 hubn20019 csernely-patak v lgye 172,34 0 20,393889 48,164722 hubn20020 s tai t k s-v lgy * 114,17 0 20,410833 48,174167 hubn20021 domah zai hangony-patak v lgye * 1 171,03 0 20,090278 48,186111 hubn20025 nagybarcai liget-hegy s saj velezdi gett-hegy * 1 202,24 0 20,494167 48,253889 hubn20027 zdi harmaci-dombok 73,7 0 20,246111 48,2425 hubn20029 girincsi nagy-erd * 112,1 0 20,973611 47,961667 hubn20030 hej mente * 457,91 0 20,9453 47,8878 hubn20031 mez cs ti rig s 93,2 0 20,944722 47,817222 hubn20032 tiszakeszi-morotva * 290,96 0 20,980556 47,771667 hubn20034 borsodi-mez s g * 14 849,84 0 20,819722 47,7825 hubn20035 poroszl i szikesek * 917,86 0 20,602222 47,645 hubn20036 k t tk zi-legel * 182,7 0 20,583611 47,683333 hubn20037 nagy-hanyi * 167,81 0 20,372778 47,694167 hubn20038 kerecsendi berek-erd s l g -part * 142,79 0 20,324444 47,785 hubn20039 pusztafogacs * 319,62 0 20,173889 47,614444 hubn20040 nagy-fert gulya-gyep hamvaj r s szikes puszt i * 1 817,09 0 20,407778 47,57 hubn20041 p lyi szikesek * 2 769,4 0 20,311667 47,518889 hubn20042 boldogi vajda-r t 123,49 0 19,668889 47,600833 hubn20043 verpel ti v r-hegy * 8,39 0 20,207778 47,860833 hubn20044 recski hegyes-hegy * 161,46 0 20,074722 47,918611 hubn20046 gy ngy si s r-hegy * 352,68 0 19,973333 47,7975 hubn20047 m tra szaki let r se * 780,06 0 20,028333 47,881111 hubn20048 gy ngy starj ni vil gos-hegy s rossz-r tek * 326,71 0 19,839167 47,860556 hubn20049 m trab rc fall sk ti-r tek * 1 506,88 0 19,846944 47,918611 hubn20050 gy ngy spatai havas * 324,62 0 19,798056 47,837222 hubn20051 nyugat-m tra * 1 498,55 0 19,745 47,893056 hubn20052 apci somly * 42,53 0 19,706389 47,793889 hubn20053 pet fib nyai kopasz-hegy * 25,4 0 19,704722 47,772222 hubn20055 szentk ti meszes-tet * 892,6 0 19,759722 47,991111 hubn20056 tepke * 2 422,69 0 19,667778 47,951944 hubn20057 b zma * 832,32 0 19,579167 47,914722 hubn20058 buj ki csirke-hegy s k ntor-r t * 170,61 0 19,529722 47,871389 hubn20059 szandai v rhegy * 33,7 0 19,421944 47,909722 hubn20060 s sharty ni hencse-hegy * 106 0 19,7075 48,068889 hubn20062 k z ps -ipoly-v lgy 1 679,02 0 19,383889 48,089167 hubn20063 karancs * 881,79 0 19,78 48,146389 hubn20064 salg * 139,2 0 19,853333 48,145833 hubn20065 gortva-v lgy * 155,33 0 19,8975 48,135278 hubn20067 szilv sv radi aszal s szilv s-patak mente * 183,83 0 20,3925 48,1322 hubn20068 saj mercsei k rtv lyes-d l 196,58 0 20,406944 48,248611 hubn20069 keszny teni saj - b l * 4 729,32 0 21,093611 47,991111 hubn20071 bodrogzug s bodrog hull mtere * 7 371,56 0 21,4725 48,2225 hubn20072 tokaji kopasz-hegy * 350,77 0 21,377778 48,120278 hubn20073 bodrogszegi v rhegy * 41,99 0 21,361389 48,200556 hubn20074 t llyai pat cs-hegy s tor-hegy * 675,39 0 21,203056 48,262778 hubn20075 s rospataki mandul s * 8,59 0 21,546111 48,325 hubn20077 erd b nyei olaszliszkai magyar n szirmos sztyeppr tek * 22,42 0 21,381111 48,272778 hubn20078 p cini mosonna-erd * 224,55 0 21,848611 48,349444 hubn20079 r vle nyv ri erd k 353,51 0 22,014444 48,324444 hubn20081 long-erd * 3 159,72 0 21,638611 48,351944 hubn20082 fels regmeci ronyva * 172,35 0 21,620278 48,468056 hubn20084 k zponti-zempl ni-hegys g * 8 665,78 0 21,388056 48,43 hubn20085 szaki-zempl ni-hegys g * 1 853,98 0 21,469444 48,559444 hubn20087 bask i r tek * 585,98 0 21,318889 48,340278 hubn20088 reg ci v rhegy * 245,68 0 21,338056 48,378889 hubn20089 f z ri p l-hegy * 732,77 0 21,403889 48,537778 hubn20090 koml skai mogyor s-tet s zsid -r t * 357,75 0 21,469722 48,359167 hubn20092 telkib nyai kir ly-hegy * 182,09 0 21,4025 48,481111 hubn20093 b zsvai temet alja * 12,03 0 21,477222 48,470833 hubn21094 buj ki h nyeli-erd s als -r t * 50,21 0 19,58 47,845278 hubn21095 nagyl ci k -hegy * 198,1 0 19,570833 48,059167 hubn22096 tisza jv rosi rt ri erd k * 188,48 0 21,088333 47,915278 hudd20001 tenkes * 1 558,75 0 18,271111 45,895 hudd20003 vill nyk vesdi fekete-hegy * 290,88 0 18,415833 45,876389 hudd20004 d l-zselic * 6 804,78 0 17,993333 46,168889 hudd20006 sz rsomly * 270,03 0 18,424444 45,863333 hudd20007 kelet-dr va * 6 623,5 0 17,718333 45,835556 hudd20008 orm ns gi erd k * 10 532,05 0 17,951667 45,9075 hudd20010 cs rd-hegyszentm rtomi v lgyek 259,76 0 18,134444 45,916944 hudd20011 szeksz rdi-dombvid k * 2 446,15 0 18,621389 46,311389 hudd20012 geresdi-dombvid k * 6 567,4 0 18,568611 46,190556 hudd20014 j nosh zi-erd s gett-berek * 619,3 0 17,3853 46,2806 hudd20015 kisbajomi erd k * 1 299,55 0 17,483056 46,289722 hudd20016 szak-zselici erd s gek * 16 248,33 0 17,806389 46,269167 hudd20017 mocsol di-erd 2 586,05 0 17,819444 46,616944 hudd20018 pati-erd * 332,11 0 17,669722 46,381667 hudd20019 mernyei-erd * 250,41 0 17,794444 46,4775 hudd20020 k z p-mez f ldi l szv lgyek * 1 597,93 0 18,838056 46,73 hudd20022 szakad ti l szgyepek * 28,31 0 18,460556 46,5575 hudd20023 tolnai duna * 7 161,69 0 18,959167 46,650556 hudd20024 aparhanti sztyepp * 21,45 0 18,4575 46,343611 hudd20026 lengyel-h gy szi erd k 3 635,99 0 18,356667 46,423611 hudd20028 kopp ny menti r tek * 362,79 0 18,129444 46,581667 hudd20029 kissz kelyi-dombs g * 2 979,07 0 18,528056 46,675833 hudd20030 mecsek * 26 181,17 0 18,365 46,208611 hudd20031 feh rv z * 1 550,01 0 17,514722 46,639444 hudd20032 gemenc * 20 704,09 0 18,8833 46,2731 hudd20033 nagyhajm si dombok 456,68 0 18,266667 46,393889 hudd20034 balatonendr di dombok * 158,97 0 17,981111 46,855833 hudd20035 pog ny-v lgyi r tek * 1 987,1 0 17,582222 46,693611 hudd20036 ordacsehi berek * 749,1 0 17,610556 46,754167 hudd20038 d ndi fels -hegy 9,94 0 18,158611 46,849444 hudd20039 d k ny-hegy * 885,65 0 18,087222 46,7275 hudd20040 tengelici homokvid k * 5 788,12 0 18,7181 46,715 hudd20041 d l-balatoni berkek * 488,55 0 17,895 46,8394 hudd20042 k r shegyi erd k * 1 682,3 0 17,881667 46,806111 hudd20043 kopasz-dombi erd * 1 045,71 0 17,828333 46,723889 hudd20044 boronka-mell ke * 11 491,39 0 17,489167 46,488611 hudd20045 b da-karapancsa * 10 797,61 0 18,697222 45,993611 hudd20046 t r kkopp nyi erd k 2 164,79 0 18,019722 46,569722 hudd20047 vityai-erd * 1 290,39 0 17,724167 46,634722 hudd20049 somogyt ri erd k * 1 734,08 0 17,726944 46,701944 hudd20050 szenes-legel * 380,07 0 18,661944 46,652222 hudd20051 dar nyi bor k s * 3 479,46 0 17,562222 45,986667 hudd20052 orm ns gi vizes l helyek s gyepek * 1 414,36 0 17,712778 45,884722 hudd20053 csokonyavisontai f s legel * 497,07 0 17,465833 46,043889 hudd20054 nyugat-dr va * 373,84 0 16,891944 46,284167 hudd20055 z k ny- rtilosi dombok * 270,94 0 16,897222 46,290556 hudd20056 k z p-dr va * 6 274,93 0 17,356389 46,031389 hudd20057 somogymeggyesi erd 678,26 0 17,944444 46,707222 hudd20058 l tr nyi-puszta * 981,4 0 17,746944 46,763333 hudd20059 balatonkereszt ri r tek * 588,65 0 17,418333 46,691389 hudd20060 rinyaszentkir lyi-erd * 507,4 0 17,379444 46,1825 hudd20061 holl di-erd * 1 978,82 0 17,342778 46,646667 hudd20062 nyugat-dr va-s k * 5 178,28 0 17,164167 46,180556 hudd20063 szentai-erd * 19 527,57 0 17,211944 46,233333 hudd20064 s gv ri dombok * 2 343,81 0 18,062778 46,812222 hudd20065 t tt si-erd 1 189,15 0 18,534444 45,898889 hudd20066 p csi-s k * 505,23 0 18,131111 46,048889 hudd20067 sz kelyszabari erd 287,57 0 18,586111 46,054167 hudd20068 gy k nyesi erd k 776,31 0 16,976111 46,274722 hudd20069 paksi rgemez * 352,14 0 18,813889 46,619444 hudd20070 tengelici r tek * 466,35 0 18,643333 46,588333 hudd20071 paksi tarka s fr nyos * 91,16 0 18,759444 46,571389 hudd20072 dunaszentgy rgyi-l perd * 328,03 0 18,83 46,546944 hudd20073 szedresi s-s rv z * 753,01 0 18,666667 46,447222 hudi20001 csi gyepek * 299,11 0 17,895 47,686111 hudi20002 adony-perk tai l szv lgyek * 201,19 0 18,821944 47,084444 hudi20003 alapi kasz l r tek * 518,58 0 18,654722 46,815278 hudi20004 aszal-v lgy * 102,16 0 18,431944 47,237222 hudi20005 b rsonyos * 1 209,66 0 18,154444 47,48 hudi20006 bels b r ndi l szv lgy * 280,69 0 18,514444 47,0975 hudi20007 besny i l szv lgy * 40,99 0 18,826667 47,194444 hudi20008 b rzs ny * 30 401,22 0 18,935278 47,913056 hudi20009 budai-hegys g * 9 522,14 0 18,903889 47,550556 hudi20010 buda rsi kop rok * 574,68 0 18,9275 47,4725 hudi20011 cs pi gyepek * 334,94 0 18,066667 47,589722 hudi20012 cs vharaszti homokvid k * 1 199,86 0 19,37 47,2969 hudi20013 csolnoki l szgyepek * 410,76 0 18,709722 47,674722 hudi20014 debegi -hegy * 84,7 0 19,1575 47,715556 hudi20015 d li-gerecse * 4 815,13 0 18,535556 47,542222 hudi20016 ep li szarmata vonulat * 1 577,49 0 18,668611 47,638611 hudi20017 rd-t t nyi plat * 1 164,85 0 18,853056 47,435278 hudi20018 szaki-gerecse * 2 687,12 0 18,606944 47,721389 hudi20019 fels -t pi * 2 047,64 0 19,681944 47,401667 hudi20020 gerecse * 2 437,1 0 18,433889 47,69 hudi20021 gerje-mente * 3 343,07 0 19,885278 47,128889 hudi20022 g g ny- s k r s- r mente * 817,73 0 19,886944 47,058611 hudi20023 g d ll i-dombs g * 7 517,48 0 19,421944 47,593056 hudi20024 t pi gy rgye- jszilv si szikesek * 1 743,58 0 20,001389 47,311389 hudi20025 hajta mente * 5794 0 19,818056 47,400833 hudi20026 ipoly v lgye * 2 936,79 0 18,761111 47,901944 hudi20027 kelet-mez f ldi l szv lgyek * 315,5 0 18,749444 46,870556 hudi20028 kirvai l szgyepek * 252,28 0 18,725556 47,619444 hudi20029 kocsi gyepek * 47,25 0 18,219167 47,583333 hudi20030 k zponti-gerecse * 5 911,5 0 18,540278 47,654167 hudi20031 lajoskom romi l szv lgyek * 909,76 0 18,3633 46,7864 hudi20032 mocsai rg s legel * 86,26 0 18,222222 47,710278 hudi20033 m ri- rok * 684,13 0 18,342778 47,2525 hudi20034 duna s rtere * 16 573,52 0 19,124722 47,705 hudi20035 nagyk r si pusztai t lgyesek * 3 302,06 0 19,71 47,044444 hudi20036 nagyl ki l szv lgyek * 288,8 0 18,656944 46,934722 hudi20037 nyakas-tet szarmata vonulat * 614,22 0 18,709167 47,568056 hudi20038 nyugat-cserh t s nasz ly * 9 609,02 0 19,268889 47,789722 hudi20039 pilis s visegr di-hegys g * 30 145,74 0 18,910556 47,703889 hudi20040 g d ll i-dombs g peremhegyei * 317,62 0 19,215 47,624444 hudi20041 p c alja * 61,9 0 18,655556 47,470556 hudi20042 r ckevei duna- g * 3 190,51 0 18,975833 47,244722 hudi20043 reketty s * 305,68 0 19,911944 47,38 hudi20044 s rr t * 4 108,59 0 18,288611 47,176389 hudi20045 szigethalmi homokbuck k * 68,99 0 19,02 47,329444 hudi20046 sz kek * 3 616,3 0 19,874444 47,213611 hudi20047 szigeti homokok * 848,9 0 19,0986 47,6453 hudi20048 szom di gyepek * 295,04 0 18,324722 47,700278 hudi20049 szentgy rgypuszta * 975,44 0 18,710556 47,410833 hudi20050 als -t pi s patakv lgyek * 1 801,41 0 19,5925 47,387222 hudi20051 turj nvid k * 12 213,44 0 19,3189 47,1511 hudi20052 rd-sz zhalombattai t blar g * 24,83 0 18,938333 47,350556 hudi20053 velencei-hegys g * 4 001,23 0 18,5603 47,2583 hudi20054 velencei-t * 1 082,13 0 18,563056 47,197778 hudi20055 veresegyh zi-medence * 354,99 0 19,29 47,6233 hudi21056 j szkarajen i puszt k * 6 968,26 0 19,985 47,084722 hudi30001 v rtes * 25 553,63 0 18,3847 47,4417 hudi30002 z molyi-medence * 2 595,09 0 18,4444 47,3406 hufh20001 r bak z * 5 973,01 0 16,9664 47,575 hufh20002 fert t * 11 298,94 0 16,7081 47,6822 hufh20003 fert mell ki dombsor * 2 563,76 0 16,6375 47,6994 hufh20006 dudlesz-erd * 1 091,88 0 16,5719 47,7306 hufh20007 p ri-rep l t r * 214,96 0 17,8067 47,6261 hufh20008 pannonhalmi-dombs g * 7 676,23 0 17,6731 47,5211 hufh20009 g ny i-homokvid k * 2 880,9 0 17,8047 47,7178 hufh20010 r pce mente * 1 626,14 0 16,9469 47,395 hufh20011 r ba * 5 106,72 0 17,3897 47,5356 hufh20012 soproni-hegys g * 5 264,47 0 16,5169 47,6669 hufh20013 hat r-menti erd k * 2 252,83 0 16,6983 47,5167 hufh30004 szigetk z * 17 183,02 0 17,5089 47,8619 hufh30005 hans g * 13 545,17 0 17,1272 47,6717 huhn20001 fels -tisza * 28 681,89 0 21,798333 48,216111 huhn20002 hortob gy * 105 170,03 0 21,126389 47,625556 huhn20003 tisza-t * 17 830,37 0 20,680833 47,613056 huhn20004 fels -sebes-k r s 517,53 0 21,565556 46,998333 huhn20005 nagy-sz ks s rakotty s * 248,75 0 21,7575 47,303056 huhn20006 pocsaji csordalegel * 168,97 0 21,811667 47,295 huhn20007 szentp terszeg-hencidai gyepek * 1 018,82 0 21,653056 47,268056 huhn20008 kismarja pocsaj eszt ri-gyepek * 2 427,05 0 21,845278 47,255 huhn20009 derecske kony ri gyepek * 3 787,9 0 21,554444 47,324722 huhn20010 pocsaji-kapu * 284,24 0 21,855556 47,296667 huhn20011 hencidai csere-erd * 121,1 0 21,685556 47,234167 huhn20012 s ndorosi tavak * 474,29 0 21,726389 47,335278 huhn20013 k z p-bihar * 12045 0 21,476111 47,103333 huhn20014 kismarjai nagy-szik * 848,18 0 21,793056 47,211389 huhn20015 k z p-tisza * 14 235,59 0 20,139444 46,939444 huhn20016 k k-k ll -v lgye * 1 504,03 0 21,948333 47,450833 huhn20017 hajd bagosi-legel * 308,08 0 21,676389 47,408611 huhn20018 mikep rcsi ny rf shegyi-legel * 229,16 0 21,657778 47,434167 huhn20019 b nki-erd * 368,55 0 21,7925 47,46 huhn20020 monostorp lyi-legel * 150,52 0 21,779722 47,413611 huhn20021 hal pi ll -hegy * 176,05 0 21,839722 47,511389 huhn20022 rauchbauer-erd * 205,9 0 21,867778 47,556667 huhn20023 h rmashegyi-t lgyesek * 501,06 0 21,825278 47,556944 huhn20024 martinkai-legel * 368,26 0 21,786944 47,577778 huhn20025 k rises j n s-r sz * 324,39 0 21,928889 47,546944 huhn20026 ny r br nyi k poszt s-lapos * 77,5 0 21,99 47,558611 huhn20027 ny r br nyi kis-mogyor s * 168,65 0 22,020278 47,568056 huhn20028 csohos-t * 191,74 0 21,8575 47,431667 huhn20029 l tav rtesi falu-r t 54,37 0 21,853333 47,3875 huhn20030 f l pi l pr tek * 22,36 0 22,108056 47,591667 huhn20031 hanelek * 95 0 22,095556 47,572222 huhn20032 g ti-erd * 5 682,98 0 21,931389 47,652222 huhn20033 debrecen-hajd b sz rm nyi t lgyesek * 5 634,62 0 21,610278 47,621667 huhn20035 mb lyi-erd s f nyi-erd * 1 433,34 0 22,247222 47,721667 huhn20036 b torligeti nagy-legel * 450,72 0 22,2375 47,775556 huhn20037 b torligeti-l p * 329,89 0 22,273333 47,778889 huhn20038 jtanyai l pok * 333,59 0 22,22 47,745833 huhn20039 piricsei j lia-liget * 73,58 0 22,201389 47,746389 huhn20040 apagyi albert-t * 94,16 0 21,895556 47,979444 huhn20041 apagyi falu-r t 34,63 0 21,94 47,964722 huhn20042 napkori legel * 161,29 0 21,896667 47,933333 huhn20043 paszabi kubikg dr k 19,15 0 21,664167 48,158611 huhn20044 j szd zsai pap-erd * 61,98 0 20,03 47,568056 huhn20045 kaszonyi-hegy d dai-erd * 1 326,58 0 22,481389 48,2325 huhn20046 gel nes beregdar c * 1 159,49 0 22,508056 48,185278 huhn20047 v mosatya-csaroda * 2 008,09 0 22,417778 48,178889 huhn20048 tarpa-t kos * 6 351,29 0 22,494167 48,118889 huhn20049 l nya-tiszaszalka * 4 135,02 0 22,327222 48,273333 huhn20050 k m r -f lesd * 1 943,52 0 22,633611 48,020833 huhn20051 eret-hegy * 142,45 0 22,588333 48,004722 huhn20053 magosligeti-erd s gyepek * 560,2 0 22,821667 48,05 huhn20054 csaholc garbolc * 4 054,45 0 22,815 47,974444 huhn20055 rozs ly csengersima * 984,63 0 22,750833 47,889167 huhn20056 j nki-erd * 397,96 0 22,687778 47,942778 huhn20057 gr fi-erd * 229,06 0 22,338611 48,034167 huhn20058 teremi-erd * 912,49 0 22,323056 47,778611 huhn20059 bika-r t * 66,02 0 22,099444 47,684722 huhn20060 ny regyh zi l t r * 189,31 0 21,696944 47,924167 huhn20062 feh rt i l t r * 159,06 0 22,073889 47,921389 huhn20063 baktai-erd * 970,45 0 22,055556 47,977778 huhn20064 rohodi-legel * 52,74 0 22,125278 48,015278 huhn20065 ny rturai-legel * 28,87 0 21,816389 48,029167 huhn20067 csik s-l pos * 78,1 0 21,986389 47,855833 huhn20069 hajd szoboszl i szikes gyepek * 553,96 0 21,361667 47,435833 huhn20070 darvasi csiff-puszta * 472,26 0 21,337222 47,123611 huhn20071 ny rmih lydi-legel * 67,08 0 21,941667 47,749722 huhn20072 b k nyi k z s-legel * 84,68 0 21,716944 47,728056 huhn20073 j sz roksz ll si szikesek * 289,65 0 19,983056 47,6075 huhn20074 alatty ni berki-erd 39,29 0 20,043056 47,406389 huhn20076 bors halmi-legel * 1 555,53 0 19,945833 47,554167 huhn20077 j szf nyszarui-erd 29,45 0 19,700556 47,569444 huhn20078 j szs gi zagyva- rt r * 487,43 0 19,833056 47,501944 huhn20079 pusztamizsei-erd 84,62 0 19,9975 47,461111 huhn20081 jsz sz-j szboldogh zi gyepek * 1 963,84 0 20,008889 47,3275 huhn20085 j szap ti j szkis ri szikesek * 1 781,24 0 20,173611 47,503611 huhn20089 als -zagyva hull mtere * 451,31 0 20,206667 47,214444 huhn20092 hajd szov ti gyepek * 344,78 0 21,485 47,388889 huhn20093 kaba-f ldesi gyepek * 5 079,5 0 21,2475 47,317778 huhn20095 l nyi-legel * 411,07 0 21,701111 47,206389 huhn20098 d l- sv nyi gyepek * 1 483,15 0 21,287222 47,229167 huhn20100 gat ly * 713,55 0 21,134167 47,2475 huhn20101 bihari-legel * 2 644,04 0 21,594444 47,180833 huhn20103 berekb sz rm ny k rm sdpusztai legel k * 1 370,99 0 21,610833 47,0675 huhn20105 cs km i gyepek * 607,48 0 21,2425 47,035556 huhn20106 jfeh rt i gyepek * 497,05 0 21,691389 47,7925 huhn20107 nagy-vadas * 186,25 0 21,659167 47,86 huhn20109 s st i-erd * 280,41 0 21,719722 47,991389 huhn20113 kisv rdai gyepek 687,39 0 22,041667 48,257778 huhn20114 tiszal ki szikesek * 1 587,58 0 21,4825 48,036667 huhn20116 tiszavasv ri szikesek * 333,25 0 21,421389 47,969167 huhn20120 vajai-t rol 88,88 0 22,153611 47,979444 huhn20121 czak -t * 177,85 0 21,558056 47,775833 huhn20122 t c v lgye 125,5 0 21,564167 47,616944 huhn20124 daru-r t 117,84 0 22,073056 48,045278 huhn20125 ny rgyulaji kis-r t * 156,71 0 22,08 47,895 huhn20127 kraszna menti r tek 375,48 0 22,340833 47,979722 huhn20128 ny rs g-peremi geresek * 217,28 0 22,336944 47,817778 huhn20129 ny rbogd nyi r t 61,69 0 21,863889 48,054722 huhn20131 orosi gyepek * 193 0 21,812222 47,951389 huhn20133 balk nyi libeg s 139,17 0 21,8225 47,804722 huhn20134 k ll semj ni csordalegel * 31,27 0 21,900833 47,856667 huhn20138 aranyosi-legel * 179,01 0 20,689722 47,409722 huhn20139 szal ki nagy-fert * 217,54 0 20,650833 47,45 huhn20140 rb ri-legel * 280,27 0 20,636667 47,497222 huhn20141 tiszaigar tisza rsi k rtv lyes * 611,73 0 20,801111 47,515278 huhn20144 kenderesi-legel * 526,12 0 20,680278 47,272778 huhn20145 kecskeri-puszta s k rny ke * 1 538,4 0 20,809722 47,278333 huhn20146 hegyesbor * 1 369,85 0 20,93 47,278611 huhn20148 p szt i-legel * 381,65 0 20,704722 47,080556 huhn20149 mez t ri szandazugi-legel * 386,69 0 20,656111 47,029167 huhn20152 kunszentm rtoni b bockai-legel * 181,18 0 20,320278 46,846944 huhn20153 szelev nyi t -k z * 166,04 0 20,226667 46,819722 huhn20154 cs pa-szelev nyi gyepek * 213,65 0 20,168333 46,795556 huhn20155 cserkei nagy-fert * 199,86 0 20,189722 46,843333 huhn20156 tiszasasi l p-legel * 155,37 0 20,059722 46,829722 huhn20157 tiszaugi k rtv lyes s bokros * 417,05 0 20,088333 46,859444 huhn20158 tiszak rt-tiszainokai gyepek * 471,91 0 20,140278 46,867222 huhn20159 tunyogmatolcsi holt-szamos 303,02 0 22,444722 47,949722 huhn20160 g g -szenke 72,61 0 22,603611 47,966389 huhn20161 s msoni ti bellegel * 241,07 0 21,6889 47,5619 huhn21162 j szals szentgy rgyi erd * 24,52 0 20,083889 47,399167 huhn21163 biri nagy-r t * 276,11 0 21,873056 47,849167 huhn21164 liget-legel * 2 206,81 0 21,7358 47,6733 huhn21165 pen szleki gyepek * 469,29 0 22,138333 47,606111 hukm20001 h dmez v s rhely k rny ki s csan di-h ti puszt k * 16 419,46 0 20,588056 46,483056 hukm20002 h dmez v s rhelyi k k-t * 3 910,09 0 20,3175 46,530278 hukm20003 t-erd 136,63 0 20,367778 46,54 hukm20004 sz raz- r * 1 521,66 0 20,692222 46,333611 hukm20005 deszki gyepek * 537,06 0 20,213889 46,195278 hukm20006 m gocs- r * 126,04 0 20,489444 46,595556 hukm20007 csorv si l szgyep * 12,91 0 20,813611 46,614722 hukm20008 maros * 5 964,59 0 20,496944 46,191389 hukm20009 mez hegyes-battonyai gyepek * 94,73 0 20,977222 46,355 hukm20010 gyula-szabadk gy si gyepek * 10 633,92 0 21,1175 46,5725 hukm20011 k r sk zi erd k 5 635,16 0 21,396389 46,6875 hukm20012 fekete-, feh r- s kett s-k r s * 1 979,86 0 21,073056 46,856111 hukm20013 b lmegyeri f s-puszta * 652,46 0 21,1725 46,896111 hukm20014 d vav nya k rny ki gyepek * 14 027,2 0 21,154444 47,061667 hukm20015 hortob gy-beretty * 3 079,21 0 20,838889 47,119167 hukm20016 sebes-k r s * 1 455,21 0 21,321667 46,981111 hukm20017 h rmas-k r s * 7 818,24 0 20,275278 46,850833 hukm20018 holt-sebes-k r s * 285,25 0 21,177778 46,951944 hukm20019 d l-bihari szikesek * 6 521,54 0 21,488333 46,875556 hukm20020 gyepes csatorna 170,25 0 21,294444 46,768889 hukm20021 sarkadi f si-erd 117,5 0 21,314722 46,774444 hukm20022 k les- r 71,12 0 21,415278 46,828056 hukm20023 korh ny s holt-korh ny 49,24 0 21,600278 46,865556 hukm20024 orosi t lgyes 57,13 0 21,436389 46,905833 hukm20025 gyant i erd k * 221,58 0 21,423889 46,867778 hukm20026 t nisz ll s-szarvasi gyepek * 586,66 0 20,739167 46,853333 hukm20027 csereb k ny * 10 000,19 0 20,508611 46,744722 hukm20028 t kei gyepek * 2 985,68 0 20,270556 46,736944 hukm20029 szentesi gyepek * 606,04 0 20,244167 46,6175 hukm20030 lapist -fert * 1 902,72 0 20,358611 46,635833 hukm20031 kurca 198,59 0 20,221944 46,618333 hukn20001 fels -kiskuns gi szikes puszta * 15776 0 19,1564 47,0658 hukn20002 pesz ri-erd * 1 628,46 0 19,300556 47,103333 hukn20003 fels -kiskuns gi turj nvid k * 14 436,47 0 19,310556 46,992778 hukn20004 d l-b cska * 781,46 0 19,293333 46,040833 hukn20005 tass szalkszentm rtoni szikes puszta * 1 655,22 0 19,047222 46,984167 hukn20006 nagyny ri-erd * 750,08 0 19,558611 46,949722 hukn20007 solti rg s gyep * 110,21 0 19,075278 46,799167 hukn20008 d li-homokh ts g * 2 385,97 0 19,647222 46,205 hukn20009 fels -kiskuns gi szikes tavak s miklapuszta * 19 679,72 0 19,146389 46,747222 hukn20010 szabadsz ll si rg s gyep * 74,01 0 19,241944 46,882222 hukn20011 f l ph zi homokbuck k * 2 117,13 0 19,421944 46,8925 hukn20012 szegedi rg s gyep * 187,88 0 20,092222 46,245556 hukn20013 f l psz ll s soltszentimre cseng di l pok * 3 122,99 0 19,248889 46,742778 hukn20014 haj si-homokpuszta * 463,31 0 19,166111 46,326944 hukn20015 gasegyh za orgov nyi r tek * 4 321,14 0 19,498333 46,801111 hukn20016 matk pusztai rg s gyep * 155,66 0 19,681389 46,802778 hukn20017 k z p-csongr di szikesek * 1 142,66 0 20,084444 46,452778 hukn20018 j noshalma-kunfeh rt i erd k * 1 341,34 0 19,367222 46,355 hukn20019 baksi-puszta * 4 875,17 0 20,051389 46,5575 hukn20020 harkai-t * 661,94 0 19,5725 46,479444 hukn20021 k rdi erd telek keceli l pok * 2 517,88 0 19,19 46,613056 hukn20022 kisk r si turj nos * 2 870,96 0 19,263611 46,64 hukn20023 t zl r kiskunhalasi homokbuck k * 1 929,05 0 19,52 46,509167 hukn20024 b csa-bugaci homokpuszta * 11 660,45 0 19,5919 46,6689 hukn20025 f l ph zi hossz -r t * 466,73 0 19,486111 46,864444 hukn20026 m ricg ti l pok * 766,97 0 19,725 46,595278 hukn20027 p teri-t * 782,1 0 19,898333 46,586667 hukn20028 tiszaalp r-bokrosi rt ri bl zet * 3 288,33 0 20,027222 46,817222 hukn20029 csongr di k nya-sz k * 455,96 0 20,038333 46,694722 hukn20030 pirt i nagy-t * 256,54 0 19,4631 46,5253 hukn20031 als -tisza hull mt r * 7 929,6 0 20,161389 46,534722 hukn20032 d l- rjeg * 4 585,08 0 19,1708 46,4867 hukn20033 rsekhalma-nemesn dudvari l szv lgyek * 240,26 0 19,0925 46,325278 hukn20034 ny rl rinci erd * 207,17 0 19,863056 46,874722 hukn20035 harkak t ny kiskunmajsai homokbuck k * 714,3 0 19,5903 46,53 hukn20036 imre-hegy, pirt -kiskunhalasi homokbuck k * 1 564,32 0 19,400556 46,477778 hukn22037 k khegyi l t r * 460,05 0 19,064722 46,233333 hukn30001 csongr d-bokrosi s st * 714,15 0 19,9703 46,7414 hukn30002 g t ri feh r-t * 852,78 0 19,9842 46,6525 hukn30003 izs ki kolon-t * 3 581,79 0 19,3397 46,7617 huon20001 s g-hegy * 238,06 0 17,118056 47,230833 huon20002 k szegi-hegys g * 4 018,23 0 16,4831 47,365 huon20003 abl nc patak v lgye * 1 465,45 0 16,6317 47,375 huon20005 v ti gyakorl t r * 596,56 0 16,794167 47,291111 huon20006 pinka * 486,09 0 16,4219 47,2031 huon20007 k les-tet * 385,41 0 16,785 47,224722 huon20008 r ba s cs rn c-v lgy * 12 146,75 0 17,0103 47,3478 huon20009 cs ngei legel * 181,33 0 17,04 47,353611 huon20011 kenyeri rept r * 698,76 0 17,144722 47,368333 huon20012 kemeness mj ni cserj s legel 618,48 0 17,123889 47,329167 huon20013 regcser 258,06 0 17,0275 47,27 huon20014 g rcei tufagy r s l pr t * 454,85 0 17,036389 47,223333 huon20018 rs g * 44 165,39 0 16,3589 46,8514 huon20020 gy ngy s-patak s a k szegi als -r t * 337,25 0 16,5425 47,375 rosci0008 betfia 1 759,1 22,029536 46,976208 rosci0020 c mpia careiului * 23 641,6 22,217189 47,619589 rosci0021 c mpia ierului * 21 224,6 22,25915 47,469872 rosci0025 cefa * 5 224,1 21,665383 46,909205 rosci0048 criul alb * 826,9 21,437814 46,563764 rosci0049 criul negru 1 822,8 21,772244 46,684214 rosci0050 criul repede amonte de oradea * 1 996,3 22,2523 47,067055 rosci0061 defileul criului negru * 2 208,4 22,169575 46,673539 rosci0068 diosig * 376,7 21,981011 47,318675 rosci0098 lacul pe ea * 23,1 21,997208 46,997983 rosci0104 lunca inferioar a criului repede 636,7 21,831517 47,080411 rosci0108 lunca mureului inferior * 17 397,4 20,988678 46,135169 rosci0109 lunca timiului 10 172,6 21,379628 45,691333 rosci0115 mlatina satchinez * 2 517,5 21,077653 45,96825 rosci0185 p duricea de la sant u 87,1 21,828139 47,15905 rosci0218 dealul mocrei rovina ineu * 4 190,8 21,9439 46,406044 rosci0220 s cueni 741,4 22,143808 47,335194 rosci0231 n dab socodor v rad 7 802,6 21,372097 46,411708 rosci0277 becicherecu mic * 2 087,2 21,167236 45,837522 rosci0287 comlou mare 2 622,3 20,641031 45,865836 rosci0289 coridorul drocea codru moma * 3 231,5 22,280278 46,385875 rosci0294 criul alb ntre gurahon i ineu * 1 193,9 22,100394 46,369828 rosci0345 pajitea cenad 5 965,3 20,687489 46,098486 rosci0346 pajitea ciacova * 41,9 21,124505 45,495794 rosci0348 pajitea jebel * 293,6 21,174114 45,559581 rosci0349 pajitea pesac 146 20,820597 45,909217 rosci0350 lunca teuzului 5291 21,664961 46,590753 rosci0370 r ul mure ntre lipova i p uli 608,6 21,644508 46,090028 rosci0387 salonta * 3 792,3 21,541008 46,763597 rosci0388 s r turile de la foieni gr niceri * 195,4 20,889411 45,430289 rosci0390 s r turile dinia * 1 052,5 21,070069 45,68278 rosci0401 turnu variau * 327,8 21,127828 46,276955 rosci0402 valea din s nandrei * 47,8 21,166158 45,881855 rosci0414 lovrin * 106 20,694064 45,978661 rosci0425 p durea emi a * 243,7 21,419575 45,2177 skuev0004 kop ianske slanisko * 8,7 0 21,889161 48,592276 skuev0006 latorica * 7 476,05 0 21,969549 48,48823 skuev0007 i arovsk les * 26,087 0 21,983611 48,526944 skuev0010 kom r ansk slanisko * 14,778 0 18,076634 47,76933 skuev0012 be iansky polder 2,74 0 21,949909 48,530771 skuev0017 pri orechovom rade * 1,699 0 18,111902 47,774337 skuev0019 tarbucka * 171,51 0 21,785456 48,37109 skuev0020 bisce 28,354 0 21,762839 48,681522 skuev0026 ra kovsk luh 16,89 0 21,942463 48,569082 skuev0029 ve k kopec 25,13 0 21,960707 48,418726 skuev0030 hore sk l ky * 84,434 0 21,946111 48,411111 skuev0032 ladmovsk v pence * 332,226 0 21,771667 48,420278 skuev0034 bor iansky les * 7,93 0 21,708538 48,388264 skuev0036 litava * 2 629,704 0 19,093333 48,225 skuev0037 obor nsky les 9,821 0 21,910278 48,534722 skuev0038 obor nske jamy 8,43 0 21,899758 48,539409 skuev0052 sele tianska str * 9,021 0 19,366111 48,094167 skuev0053 kiarovsk mo iar 29,548 0 19,431944 48,104722 skuev0054 c deninsk mo iar 138,166 0 19,038589 48,070418 skuev0055 ipe sk hony 24,937 0 19,061944 48,065556 skuev0064 bratislavsk luhy * 684,98 0 17,069544 48,137048 skuev0065 marcelovsk piesky * 43,894 0 18,319444 47,7775 skuev0066 kamen nske slanisk * 119,436 0 18,647222 47,870278 skuev0067 enkov * 79,24 0 18,527832 47,775826 skuev0068 jursk chlm * 104,601 0 18,525 47,800833 skuev0069 b ske slanisko * 44,597 0 18,425 47,792778 skuev0070 martovsk mokra * 33,678 0 18,094167 47,859444 skuev0071 abov * 21,123 0 18,156389 47,878056 skuev0072 detvice * 88,986 0 18,120278 47,8825 skuev0073 listov jazero * 41,534 0 18,051944 47,891111 skuev0074 dubn k * 171,851 0 17,786111 48,321111 skuev0075 kl tovsk rameno * 272,125 0 17,703889 48,021944 skuev0076 bokro sk slanisko * 9,999 0 18,256944 47,748889 skuev0077 dunajsk trstiny * 169,196 0 17,852222 47,773056 skuev0078 mostov * 22,5 0 17,905 47,768889 skuev0079 horn h j * 72,98 0 18,245556 48,174444 skuev0080 juh sove slance * 41,8435 0 17,878053 48,235219 skuev0083 eli ovsk les * 30,64 0 17,504021 48,115604 skuev0084 z to * 81,549 0 18,201389 48,023056 skuev0085 doln h j * 58,24 0 18,216944 48,165 skuev0086 kriv hrabiny * 83,041 0 18,381667 48,025 skuev0087 osminy * 98,84 0 18,358056 48,094167 skuev0088 s ky * 32,753 0 17,898056 48,221389 skuev0089 martinsk les * 994,155 0 17,381944 48,261389 skuev0090 dunajsk luhy * 4 542,025 0 17,468056 47,904722 skuev0091 plosk hora * 26,628 0 18,746667 47,860833 skuev0092 dolnov ske luhy 208,73 0 18,108443 47,796852 skuev0093 severn bod cky kan l 24,129 0 17,499167 47,9075 skuev0094 ve k les * 46,095 0 18,213333 48,119444 skuev0095 pansk l ky * 68,711 0 18,039722 48,102778 skuev0096 urianske slanisk * 169,4038 0 18,122276 48,080957 skuev0097 pal rikovsk l ky * 16,9313 0 18,074448 48,066342 skuev0098 nesvadsk piesky * 17,05 0 18,155496 47,922438 skuev0099 pavelsk slanisko * 18,6104 0 18,001863 47,771505 skuev0100 chot nske piesky * 7,131 0 18,214444 47,812222 skuev0113 dlh l ky 16,992 0 16,965 48,551389 skuev0115 bahno 49,65 0 17,270165 48,623273 skuev0116 jakubovsk rybn ky 137,705 0 16,975833 48,411111 skuev0117 abrod * 162,343 0 16,996111 48,5325 skuev0119 irok * 205,008 0 17,071667 48,414444 skuev0120 jasen cke 49,92 0 17,157145 48,554699 skuev0121 marheck rybn ky * 57,48 0 17,030288 48,409493 skuev0123 d brava * 21,213 0 16,929444 48,385278 skuev0124 bogdalick vrch * 56,589 0 16,896944 48,408333 skuev0125 gajarsk al vium moravy * 1 244,38 0 16,935641 48,537182 skuev0126 vinodolsk h jik * 21,756 0 18,199722 48,200833 skuev0129 cerovina * 354,323 0 18,722222 48,043889 skuev0155 al vium starej nitry * 433,99 0 18,130164 47,827546 skuev0156 konopisk 8,419 0 17,569462 47,945906 skuev0157 star vrch * 13,4 0 18,629496 47,819837 skuev0158 modr vrch * 147,651 0 18,646944 47,827222 skuev0159 al vium itavy * 46,398 0 18,134167 47,851944 skuev0160 kar b * 76,165 0 17,718889 47,9125 skuev0161 suchohradsk al vium moravy 55,676 0 16,859722 48,400833 skuev0162 grg s 47,063 0 17,128333 48,555833 skuev0163 rudava * 1 958,66 0 17,2283 48,529639 skuev0165 k tsky les * 374,869 0 16,973333 48,654722 skuev0166 cigl t 175,713 0 16,978611 48,559444 skuev0167 bezodn 65,447 0 17,013889 48,3825 skuev0168 horn les * 556,2 0 16,875278 48,344722 skuev0169 orlovsk v ky 206,92 0 17,0586 48,46643 skuev0170 me terova l ka 133,5 0 17,056356 48,479491 skuev0171 zelienka 141,68 0 17,162691 48,601849 skuev0172 be nisko * 922,31 0 17,223846 48,531134 skuev0173 kotlina * 398,72 0 17,346449 48,632901 skuev0174 lindava * 403,001 0 17,3675 48,368333 skuev0176 dvor iansky les * 146,843 0 18,117778 48,264444 skuev0177 molzie 67,863 0 16,907778 48,382778 skuev0178 v studienkach 19,449 0 16,876944 48,437778 skuev0179 erven rybn k * 234,695 0 17,1325 48,578056 skuev0180 ludinsk h j * 161,939 0 18,4675 47,996111 skuev0182 ovsk luhy * 483,7 0 17,731516 47,767594 skuev0183 ve kol lsky ostrov * 327,8 0 17,930528 47,749778 skuev0184 burdov * 1 680,25 0 18,780388 47,840222 skuev0208 senianske rybn ky 209,307 0 22,079444 48,694722 skuev0212 mute * 33,08 0 20,272778 48,593611 skuev0213 kazarka * 106,241 0 17,126389 48,63 skuev0217 ondria ov potok * 7,835 0 17,004444 48,343056 skuev0218 mo iarka * 221,535 0 17,0375 48,363056 skuev0219 malina * 438,845 0 17,088889 48,415278 skuev0220 a t nsky potok * 2,237 0 17,173611 48,611667 skuev0226 vani ovec * 196,84 0 17,14587 48,61326 skuev0227 ili sk mo iare 88,65 0 17,642852 47,885364 skuev0235 stretavka 17,753 0 21,995073 48,602941 skuev0236 bodrog * 107,03 0 21,767005 48,404063 skuev0257 al vium ip a * 250,644 0 19,076389 48,071111 skuev0261 dedinsk hora * 132,734 0 19,530278 48,223333 skuev0269 ostrovn l ky * 627,57 0 17,172076 48,049582 skuev0270 hru ov * 494,854 0 17,2 48,058056 skuev0272 vozok nsky luh * 6,005 0 18,673611 48,024167 skuev0279 r * 433,712 0 17,230403 48,234487 skuev0280 dev nska kobyla * 643,04 0 16,99631 48,190751 skuev0285 al vium mur a * 224,51 0 20,144383 48,665904 skuev0292 drie ov hora * 9,976 0 18,464167 47,849722 skuev0293 k ovsk rameno * 475,22 0 17,675871 47,787728 skuev0294 bagovsk vrch * 222,653 0 18,352778 48,075278 skuev0295 biskupick luhy * 916,35 0 17,178854 48,084169 skuev0311 ka enky 281,409 0 16,950278 48,616111 skuev0312 dev nske al vium moravy * 155,68 0 16,959444 48,225556 skuev0313 dev nske jazero * 1 264,066 0 16,925556 48,293056 skuev0314 morava 389,924 0 16,894722 48,488333 skuev0315 skalick al vium moravy 251,449 0 17,176111 48,856111 skuev0316 raneck piesky * 272,135 0 17,284722 48,575 skuev0317 rozporec 82,858 0 16,905278 48,351389 skuev0326 strahu ka * 1 170,007 0 21,458056 48,654722 skuev0327 mili * 5 113,016 0 21,460833 48,576944 skuev0329 kov ske l ky * 146,42 0 21,714831 48,377732 skuev0340 esk z vrt 3,916 0 20,606389 48,543333 skuev0341 doln vrch * 1 527,467 0 20,722778 48,573056 skuev0345 ke ovsk krapy * 354,55 0 20,496111 48,503056 skuev0347 domick krapy * 111,575 0 20,469167 48,483056 skuev0352 hru ovsk lesostep * 40,104 0 20,626111 48,599444 skuev0355 fabi nka * 647,655 0 20,545 48,573333 skuev0356 horn vrch * 6 027,69 0 20,779722 48,641111 skuev0357 cerov vrchovina * 2 627,99 0 19,906668 48,200453 skuev0358 sov hrad * 41,655 0 19,921111 48,228056 skuev0359 decht rske vinice 55,18 0 20,017222 48,244722 skuev0360 bele r 61,6744 0 19,999331 48,178253 skuev0361 vodok 137,218 0 20,008056 48,206667 skuev0362 pieskovcov chrbty * 98,67 0 20,145278 48,268056 skuev0363 ahan 309,1059 0 20,106612 48,373199 skuev0365 d lovsk mo iar 82,4501 0 19,610362 48,243433 skuev0392 brezovsk str * 65,91 0 19,002252 48,168679 skuev0393 dunaj * 1 425,66 0 18,620494 47,778522 skuev0395 pohrebi te * 85,014 0 18,285278 47,770556 skuev0502 tokeravsk v penka 12,84 0 17,003792 48,202499 skuev0512 mokr les * 171,839 0 16,953889 48,337222 skuev0513 bencov mlyn * 19,987 0 16,911944 48,338611 skuev0523 lak rska duna * 5,277 0 17,175833 48,5825 skuev0526 kala tovsk potok * 44,86 0 17,244737 48,642411 skuev0527 gachovec * 30,238 0 17,209722 48,595 skuev0552 lohotsk mo iar * 22,019 0 18,012778 47,8575 skuev0669 drie ov * 90,879 0 20,041944 48,213611 skuev0800 dev nska hradn skala * 4,3959 16,978371 48,173217 skuev0814 hubovo * 224,8161 20,398969 48,39685 skuev0816 horn tok ip a 119,7744 19,6906 48,280915 skuev0817 rimava a slan 48,387 20,23601 48,291961 skuev0819 v sky dunaj * 756,1337 18,062506 47,844013 skuev0820 doln tok hrona * 587,3242 18,668884 47,878337 skuev0822 mal dunaj * 1 738,44 17,596858 48,079564 skuev0823 sovie vinohrady * 9,7954 18,716985 47,8873 skuev0824 doln tok ip a * 200,6613 18,775972 47,89413 skuev0841 doln tok tople 13,7162 21,745489 48,750365 skuev0843 doln tok ondavy 79,2396 21,81648 48,491457 skuev0844 doln tok laborca 97,3741 21,929407 48,549935 skuev0846 tisa * 76,1105 22,141986 48,393805 skuev0865 rataj * 191,9537 19,01337 48,088969 skuev0867 mochovsk cerina * 858,4015 18,41203 48,271009 skuev0869 b bsky les * 60,986 17,89409 48,304478 skuev0870 hor ianska dolina * 182,6078 18,693677 48,241025 skuev0872 jedzina * 653,2987 19,039249 48,171569 skuev0873 pohronsk inovec * 449,0544 18,490853 48,377794 skuev0874 lnok * 476,7867 18,343833 48,447303 skuev0875 ierny hrad * 101,0859 18,96608 48,173689 skuev0876 horn hora * 132,8492 18,71384 48,207801 skuev0882 patianska cerina * 808,4726 18,402977 48,19544 skuev0889 medovarsk dubiny * 219,5719 19,017378 48,241305 skuev0890 p rovsk * 129,6942 18,963036 48,244517 skuev0891 doman cke str ne * 20,5472 18,983122 48,262469 skuev0899 borsk piesky 16,736 17,19164 48,626602 skuev0902 vetern k * 21,3836 17,232658 48,817428 skuev0904 gbelsk les * 267,8898 17,058851 48,720165 skuev0905 hol ske al vium moravy 145,8496 17,125597 48,811493 skuev0906 kala tovsk bor 357,0612 17,245483 48,639864 skuev0908 kaltenbruk * 88,9114 17,180807 48,486839 skuev0917 dlh vrch * 4,5834 20,840064 48,582825 skuev0920 sokolia skala * 11,7575 20,565982 48,545751 skuev0921 meliatsky profil * 11,8955 20,321786 48,515258 skuev0922 buben k * 170,2714 20,532463 48,535604 skuev0935 hani tiansky les * 119,8534 21,224974 48,638554 skuev0944 horn dske meandre * 198,3329 21,318409 48,557189 skuev0948 boler zske sys ovisko 56,6374 17,531509 48,451933 skuev0954 stredn tok bodvy 51,27 20,896162 48,583538 skuev0958 stredn tok ip a 111,6349 19,365079 48,096475 skuev0959 galamia 18,1815 19,122387 48,069914 skuev1007 i arovsk les * 72,235 0 21,979167 48,519722 skuev1064 bratislavsk luhy * 28,977 0 17,136111 48,131667 skuev1125 gajarsk al vium moravy 469,18 0 16,943292 48,529146 skuev1173 kotlina * 205,57 0 17,351065 48,626099 skuev1182 ovsk luhy * 194,21 0 17,72613 47,775339 skuev1227 il sk mo iare * 338,236 0 17,702778 47,836389 skuev1269 ostrovn l ky * 12,43 0 17,202014 48,034031 skuev1293 k ovsk rameno * 197,809 0 17,679722 47,785278 skuev1311 ka enky 32,195 0 16,949722 48,603889 skuev1316 raneck piesky * 720,684 0 17,301389 48,586667 skuev1357 cerov vrchovina * 397,85 0 20,059156 48,230055 skuev1362 pieskovcov chrbty * 220,671 0 20,155833 48,266389 skuev2019 tarbucka 8,8995 21,783748 48,382223 skuev2064 bratislavsk luhy * 235,7988 17,064276 48,133511 skuev2067 enkov * 176,3433 18,518661 47,779859 skuev2090 dunajsk luhy * 1 225,1312 17,757343 47,769961 skuev2098 nesvadsk piesky * 19,3135 18,158 47,91916 skuev2133 h 'rky * 173,8501 18,259045 48,478023 skuev2155 al vium starej nitry * 140,4025 18,116167 47,840562 skuev2158 modr vrch * 21,3556 18,630175 47,821026 skuev2165 k tsky les 11,3317 16,984128 48,665045 skuev2184 burdov * 253,2198 18,741673 47,840094 skuev2269 ostrovn l ky * 15,0029 17,180448 48,045645 skuev2272 vozok nsky luh * 9,9027 18,675039 48,018663 skuev2285 al vium mur a * 63,2139 20,200277 48,653095 skuev2294 bagovsk vrch * 143,2841 18,377645 48,071477 skuev2315 skalick al vium moravy 106,0304 17,165926 48,84288 skuev2357 cerov vrchovina * 555,3824 20,111646 48,227291 skuev2392 brezovsk str * 354,1253 19,001799 48,18006 skuev2393 dunaj * 667,2966 18,300021 47,741473

name: commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/17 of 14 december 2018 adopting the twelfth update of the list of sites of community importance for the alpine biogeographical region (notified under document c(2018) 8527) type: decision_impl subject matter: natural environment; environmental policy; regions and regional policy date published: 2019-01-09 9.1.2019 en official journal of the european union l 7/28 commission implementing decision (eu) 2019/17 of 14 december 2018 adopting the twelfth update of the list of sites of community importance for the alpine biogeographical region (notified under document c(2018) 8527) the european commission, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to council directive 92/43/eec of 21 may 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (1), and in particular the third subparagraph of article 4(2) thereof, whereas: (1) the alpine biogeographical region referred to in article 1(c)(iii) of directive 92/43/eec comprises the union territories of the alps (germany, france, italy, austria and slovenia), the pyrenees (spain and france), the apennine mountains (italy), the northern fennoscandian mountains (finland and sweden), the carpathian mountains (poland, romania and slovakia), the dinaric mountains (slovenia and croatia) and the balkan, rila, pirin, rhodope and the sashtinska sredna gora mountains (bulgaria), as specified in the biogeographical map approved on 20 april 2005 by the committee set up by article 20 of that directive (the habitats committee). (2) the initial list of sites of community importance for the alpine biogeographical region, within the meaning of directive 92/43/eec, was adopted by commission decision 2004/69/ec (2). that list was last updated by commission implementing decision (eu) 2018/42 (3). (3) the sites included in the list of sites of community importance for the alpine biogeographical region form part of the natura 2000 network which is an essential element of the protection of biodiversity in the union. in order to make further progress in the actual establishment of the natura 2000 network and in the context of a dynamic adaptation of that network, the lists of sites of community importance are reviewed regularly. (4) between 19 june 2017 and 2 march 2018 member states have proposed additional sites of community importance for the alpine biogeographical region within the meaning of article 1 of directive 92/43/eec. member states have also submitted changes in the site-related information contained in the list of sites of community importance for the alpine biogeographical region. (5) on the basis of the draft list drawn up by the commission in agreement with each of the member states concerned, which also identifies sites hosting priority natural habitat types or priority species, an updated list of sites selected as sites of community importance for the alpine biogeographical region should be adopted. articles 4(4) and 6 of directive 92/43/eec apply to the newly included sites. (6) knowledge of the existence and distribution of the natural habitat types and species is constantly evolving as a result of the surveillance undertaken in accordance with article 11 of directive 92/43/eec. therefore, the evaluation and selection of sites at union level was carried out using the best available information at the time. (7) certain member states have not proposed sufficient sites to meet the requirements of directive 92/43/eec for certain habitat types and species. furthermore, knowledge of the existence and distribution of some of the natural habitat types listed in annex i and some of the species listed in annex ii to directive 92/43/eec remains incomplete. for those habitat types and species it can therefore not be concluded that the natura 2000 network is complete. (8) in the interests of clarity and transparency, implementing decision (eu) 2018/42 should be repealed. (9) the measures provided for in this decision are in accordance with the opinion of the habitats committee, has adopted this decision: article 1 the twelfth update of the list of sites of community importance for the alpine biogeographical region as set out in the annex is adopted. article 2 implementing decision (eu) 2018/42 is repealed. article 3 this decision is addressed to the member states. done at brussels, 14 december 2018. for the commission karmenu vella member of the commission (1) oj l 206, 22.7.1992, p. 7. (2) commission decision 2004/69/ec of 22 december 2003 adopting, pursuant to council directive 92/43/eec, the list of sites of community importance for the alpine biogeographical region (oj l 14, 21.1.2004, p. 21). (3) commission implementing decision (eu) 2018/42 of 12 december 2017 adopting the eleventh update of the list of sites of community importance for the alpine biogeographical region (oj l 15, 19.1.2018, p. 351). annex twelfth update of the list of sites of community importance for the alpine biogeographical region each site of community importance (sci) is identified by the information supplied in the natura 2000 format, including the corresponding map. this information has been transmitted by the competent national authorities in accordance with the second subparagraph of article 4(1) of directive 92/43/eec. the table below gives the following information: a : sci code comprising nine characters, the first two being the iso code for the member state; b : name of sci; c : * = presence on the sci of at least one priority natural habitat type and/or species within the meaning of article 1 of directive 92/43/eec; d : area of sci in hectares or length of sci in km; e : geographical coordinates of sci (latitude and longitude) in decimal degrees. all the information given in the union list below is based on the data proposed, transmitted and validated by bulgaria, croatia, germany, spain, france, italy, austria, poland, romania, slovenia, slovakia, finland and sweden. a b c d e sci code name of sci * area of sci (ha) length of sci (km) geographical coordinates of sci longitude latitude at1203a00 tscher d rrenstein * 42 596,57 0 15,1111 47,8403 at1211a00 wienerwald thermenregion * 52 168,59 0 16,125 48,1472 at1212a00 nord stliche randalpen: hohe wand schneeberg rax * 64 084,57 0 15,9833 47,8833 at1219000 nieder sterreichische alpenvorlandfl sse * 7 024,54 0 15,2694 48,1833 at2101000 nationalpark hohe tauern, k rnten i * 34625 0 12,8 47 at2102000 nockberge * 7744 0 13,75 46,8833 at2103000 h rfeld moor k rntner anteil * 88 0 14,5167 47,0078 at2104000 sablatnig moor * 101,7 0 14,6028 46,575 at2105000 vellacher kotschna * 586 0 14,5667 46,3833 at2106000 mussen * 399 0 12,9206 46,7139 at2108000 inneres p llatal * 3198 0 13,4667 47,0592 at2109000 wolayersee und umgebung * 1940 0 12,8833 46,6167 at2110000 gro edlinger teich * 8 0 14,8436 46,7967 at2112000 villacher alpe (dobratsch) * 2327 0 13,6833 46,5972 at2113000 flachwasserbiotop neudenstein * 18 0 14,5861 46,6419 at2114000 obere drau * 1030 0 13,2333 46,75 at2115000 hochmoor bei st. lorenzen * 48 0 13,9194 46,8639 at2116000 g rtschacher moos obermoos im gailtal * 1242 0 13,5 46,6 at2117000 turner see * 59 0 14,575 46,5833 at2118000 gail im lesachtal * 55 0 12,9333 46,6792 at2119000 gut walterskirchen * 32 0 14,1972 46,6194 at2120000 sch tt graschelitzen * 2307 0 13,6833 46,5833 at2121000 h fleinmoor * 6 0 14,3958 46,5767 at2122000 ratschitschacher moor * 23 0 14,705 46,6428 at2123000 m serner moor * 12 0 13,25 46,705 at2124000 untere lavant * 131,59 0 14,8858 46,7044 at2125000 reifnitzbach * 1,7 0 14,175 46,6042 at2126000 tiebelm ndung * 62,5 0 14,0139 46,6958 at2127000 fronwiesen * 69 0 14,1083 46,5267 at2128000 kalk-tuffquellen v lkermarkter stausee * 3,7 0 14,6667 46,6264 at2130000 lendspitz-maiernigg * 77,61 0 14,2597 46,6111 at2131000 mannsberg-boden * 683 0 14,5042 46,7972 at2132000 hainsche-moor * 1,3 0 14,2017 46,5514 at2133000 guntschacher au * 53 0 14,3433 46,5475 at2134000 mittagskogel * 672,3 0 13,9692 46,512 at2135000 kalktuffquellen lappenbach * 4,8 0 13,0419 46,7259 at2136000 gelbe alpenrose in lendorf 0,6481 0 13,419 46,8419 at2137000 schlossberg griffen 10 0 14,7278 46,7051 at2138000 gurkm ndung * 24,4 0 14,5012 46,6043 at2139000 gr nspitz-streifenfarn in radenthein 6,1 0 13,6826 46,7991 at2140000 millst tter see-s d 39,5 0 13,5846 46,7881 at2141000 watzelsdorfer moos 32,6 0 14,6773 46,6581 at2142000 ziegelteich bei h rtendorf 6,85 0 14,3848 46,6399 at2143000 lanzendorfer moor 4,23 0 14,4554 46,6552 at2144000 gutschen 52,6 0 14,5444 46,798 at2145000 motschulagraben 38,9 0 14,9032 46,6369 at2146000 penkensee 8 0 14,12383 46,58227 at2147000 lichtegg bei knappenberg 3 0 14,56057 46,9287 at2148000 krampelgraben bei h henbergen 16,45 0 14,553 46,6443 at2149000 schlosspark krastowitz * 0,5 0 14,35232 46,64698 at2150000 leonstein 20 0 14,1299 46,6386 at2151000 finkensteiner moor 25,46 0 13,8845 46,5677 at2152000 moor bei st. margarethen 2,95 0 14,1478 46,5969 at2204000 steirisches dachsteinplateau * 7 455,48 0 13,79997 47,52834 at2205000 p rgschachen-moos und ennsnahe bereiche zwischen selzthal und dem ges useeingang * 1 619,14 0 14,40694 47,58 at2206000 densee * 198,29 0 13,83083 47,56389 at2207000 nsg h rfeld 47,49 0 14,51 47,01889 at2209001 steilhangmoor im untertal * 14,24 0 13,70389 47,35611 at2209002 patzenkar * 130,48 0 13,65806 47,32111 at2209003 hochlagen der s d stlichen schladminger tauern * 6 498,91 0 13,99694 47,25306 at2209004 hochlagen der stlichen w lzer tauern und seckauer alpen * 14 046,15 0 14,67611 47,34389 at2210000 ennstaler alpen/ges use * 14 529,94 0 14,61278 47,55278 at2212000 nsg w rschacher moos und ennsnahe bereiche * 401 0 14,18306 47,55389 at2215000 teile der eisenerzer alpen * 4 391,29 0 14,91389 47,49306 at2216000 kirchkogel bei pernegg 51,92 0 15,3302 47,3487 at2217000 peggauer wand 38,57 0 15,3508 47,2119 at2219000 teile des steirischen nockgebietes * 2 080,53 0 13,82083 46,93694 at2221000 gamperlacke * 86,3 0 14,27806 47,555 at2223000 p lshof bei p ls * 7,86 0 14,60583 47,22694 at2224000 zlaimm ser-moore / wei enbachalm * 12,93 0 13,89306 47,60306 at2226001 d rnberger moor * 45,15 0 14,35333 47,09694 at2226002 furtner teich * 32,03 0 14,39111 47,09111 at2227000 schluchtwald der gulling * 149,83 0 14,18806 47,49611 at2228000 ramsauer torf * 2,3 0 13,68 47,40389 at2231000 klementgrotte 0 0 15,3456 47,1602 at2233000 raabklamm * 554,93 0 15,54194 47,24111 at2234000 breitenau lantsch 7,19 0 15,4168 47,3869 at2236000 ober- und mittellauf der mur mit puxer auwald, puxer wand und gulsen * 1 307,64 0 14,8469 47,2381 at2238000 gersdorfer altarm * 8,41 0 13,965 47,45194 at2239000 hintere p lsenalm * 2,4 0 14,2597 47,3352 at2240000 ennsaltarme bei niederstuttern * 69,66 0 14,08111 47,51611 at2241000 s dlich gelegene talbereiche der g stlinger alpen 600,22 0 14,9818 47,6989 at2243000 totes gebirge mit altausseer see * 24 201,69 0 14,11944 47,61611 at2244000 flaumeichenw lder im grazer bergland * 4,54 0 15,38 47,115 at2249000 teile der schwarzen walster im mariazeller land 2,13 0 15,3578 47,8105 at2251000 plannerkessel * 1,77 0 14,1812 47,3964 at2253000 mitterndorfer biotopverbund * 258 0 13,9112 47,5634 at3101000 dachstein * 14575 0 13,6667 47,5 at3104000 radinger moorwiesen 3 0 14,3014 47,7367 at3111000 nationalpark kalkalpen und umgebung * 22553 0 14,3667 47,7667 at3116000 kalksteinmauer und orchideenwiese laussa * 103 0 14,4361 47,9556 at3117000 mond- und attersee 6135 0 13,4833 47,7917 at3128000 b che in den steyr- und ennstaler voralpen * 505,17 0 14,2929 47,9511 at3130000 hornspitzmoore * 43,3 0 13,4966 47,5689 at3133000 m sl im ebenthal * 2,34 0 14,4188 47,7024 at3134000 planwiesen 110,3 0 14,2032 47,8789 at3135000 quellflur bei grueb * 4,32 0 13,2993 47,8759 at3136000 mittlere steyr * 122 0 14,23735 47,90817 at3138000 schluchtw lder der steyr- und ennstaler voralpen * 775 0 14,2178 47,823 at3142000 egelsee und egelseemor in unterach 4,14 0 13,5043 47,8326 at3143000 offensee und angrenzendes verlandungsmoor * 65,95 0 13,8386 47,754 at3144000 goiserer wei enbachtal 1056 0 13,5076 47,6543 at3145000 r ll 327,2 0 13,9693 47,7237 at3146000 teichlboden 1,66 0 14,2919 47,6502 at3148000 burgberg losenstein * 1,83 0 14,4373 47,9239 at3203010 winklmoos * 78,08 0 12,5914 47,6506 at3204002 sieben-m ser/gerlosplatte * 168,57 0 12,1447 47,2392 at3205021 obertauern-hundsfeldmoor * 99,84 0 13,5619 47,2564 at3206007 bluntautal * 433,8 0 13,13 47,5758 at3207020 seetaler see * 214,54 0 13,9347 47,1506 at3208118 schwarzbergklamm * 14,07 0 12,6189 47,6328 at3210001 hohe tauern, salzburg * 80505 0 12,7461 47,1353 at3211012 kalkhochalpen, salzburg * 23725 0 13,0997 47,5028 at3212111 tauglgries * 50,65 0 13,1447 47,6589 at3213003 gerzkopf * 90,83 0 13,4297 47,4619 at3214000 rotmoos-k fertal * 168,74 0 12,7858 47,1247 at3222000 moore am berling * 38,41 0 13,9025 47,1736 at3224000 entrische kirche 6,39 2 13,0856 47,28 at3226000 zinkenbach-karlgraben * 100,41 0 13,355 47,6767 at3227000 untersberg-vorland * 193,23 0 12,9481 47,7547 at3230000 zeller see s dufer 32,35 0 12,81 47,3 at3231000 mooshamer moos ost 3,19 0 13,72 47,1 at3232000 kopfweiden am almkanal * 1,77 0 13,04 47,77 at3234000 kendlbruckergraben hinteralm * 20,07 0 13,8174 46,9691 at3235000 hinterrieding-wasserfallkar * 65,68 0 13,3319 47,1481 at3236000 rupanin * 144,07 0 13,6216 47,2156 at3237000 georgenberg 2,15 0 13,1649 47,6314 at3238000 pongauer taurachtal * 19,72 0 13,5044 47,2882 at3239000 k nigsbachtal 1,17 0 13,37 47,7 at3240000 drossen * 25,78 0 12,73 47,17 at3241000 streuwiese am salzweg 0,5 0 12,99 47,76 at3242000 lonka-m ander 1,03 0 13,71 47,16 at3243000 althofener moos 0,59 0 13,73 47,14 at3244000 steindorf am moos 3 0 13,71 47,13 at3245000 lucia-lacke 3,48 0 12,64 47,28 at3246000 vordergnadenalm 0,0153 0 13,4887 47,2657 at3301000 hohe tauern, tirol * 61000 0 12,4764 47,0339 at3302000 vilsalpsee * 1831 0 10,5061 47,4536 at3303000 valsertal * 3 519,4 0 11,6122 47,0361 at3304000 karwendel * 73000 0 11,4997 47,4011 at3305000 tztaler alpen * 39470 0 11,0186 46,835 at3306000 afrigal * 71,6 0 10,8161 47,3614 at3307000 egelsee * 3,07 0 12,1711 47,6139 at3308000 schwemm * 65,68 0 12,2981 47,6586 at3309000 tiroler lech * 4 146,9 0 10,54 47,3442 at3310000 arzler pitzeklamm * 31,2 0 10,7758 47,2108 at3311000 engelswand 39,8 0 10,9194 47,1639 at3313000 flie er sonnenh nge 88,84 0 10,6194 47,1167 at3314000 osttiroler gletscherfl sse isel, schwarzach und kalserbach 306,07 0 12,5632 46,9545 at3315000 sinesbrunn * 51,84 0 10,8042 47,2992 at3316000 tiefer-wald 1,73 0 10,4886 46,8743 at3401000 naturschutzgebiet rohrach * 48,19 0 9,8161 47,5878 at3402000 rheindelta * 2 065,65 0 9,6408 47,5008 at3403000 mehrerauer seeufer m ndung der bregenzerach * 118,03 0 9,7031 47,5072 at3405000 bregenzerachschlucht * 434,02 9,5 9,8136 47,4914 at3406000 witmoos * 18,19 0 9,8475 47,5033 at3407000 fohramoos * 54,3 0 9,8039 47,4203 at3408000 bangs matschels * 447,42 0 9,5389 47,2722 at3409000 ludescherberg * 377,35 0 9,8008 47,2003 at3410000 gadental * 1 543,77 0 9,9964 47,225 at3413000 wiegensee * 64,74 0 10,095 46,9769 at3414000 leiblach * 21,45 0 9,7348 47,5322 at3415000 alpenmannstreu gamperdonatal * 37,61 0 9,6539 47,0856 at3416000 spirkenw lder saminatal * 477,57 0 9,6025 47,1653 at3417000 spirkenw lder brandnertal * 104,74 0 9,7525 47,125 at3418000 spirkenwald oberer tritt * 12,7 0 9,7086 47,1356 at3419000 spirkenw lder innergamp * 43,87 0 9,6475 47,1594 at3420000 unter- berlutt 22,85 0 9,9717 47,2522 at3421000 gsieg obere m hder 73,13 0 9,6847 47,3986 at3422000 schuttfluren tafamunt 68,43 0 10,0692 46,9733 at3423000 soren, gleggen-k blern, schweizer ried und birken-schwarzes zeug 317,62 0 9,6986 47,4481 at3424000 ble schlucht 7,59 0 9,6936 47,2623 at3425000 davenna * 112,46 0 9,8839 47,1239 at3426000 frastanzer ried 39,21 0 9,6141 47,223 at3427000 bersaxen-satteins * 60,05 0 9,6871 47,2485 at3428000 unterargenstein * 68,69 0 9,955 47,3337 at3429000 unter stellerh he * 28,93 0 10,0315 47,4038 at3430000 unter der winterstaude * 25,8 0 9,9932 47,4005 at3431000 gortniel * 12,71 0 9,9497 47,0385 at3432000 ro b ndta * 12,62 0 9,946 47,0328 at3433000 spona 25,77 0 10,0106 47,007 at3434000 rifa 12,63 0 10,0465 46,9755 at3435000 torfriedbach * 9,88 0 9,7135 47,2047 at3436000 walsb chle * 16,71 0 9,6926 47,2217 at3437000 widdersteinm hder * 53,02 0 10,143 47,2716 at3438000 ifen * 2 466,72 0 10,0995 47,3543 at3439000 sch neberg * 47,4 0 10,1516 47,2329 bg0000166 vrachanski balkan * 35 981,25 23,46083 43,17083 bg0000209 pirin * 40 382,38 23,43028 41,74194 bg0000211 tvardishka planina * 38 649,53 26,06 42,84028 bg0000220 dolna mesta * 9 514,697 23,92972 41,48194 bg0000281 reka belitsa * 117,26 25,6385 42,918 bg0000308 verila * 6 443,422 23,29111 42,38472 bg0000366 kresna ilindentsi * 48 596,43 23,1647 41,7553 bg0000372 tsigansko gradishte * 9 555,741 24,875 41,40083 bg0000399 bulgarka * 24 009,03 25,3974 42,7638 bg0000494 tsentralen balkan * 72 021,07 24,73194 42,73833 bg0000495 rila * 77 927,17 23,5225 42,14444 bg0000496 rilski manastir * 25 299,8 23,36472 42,12417 bg0000625 izvoro * 7,038 23,43222 41,85806 bg0000626 krushe * 291,873 23,37694 41,85972 bg0001021 reka mesta * 19 401,69 23,66222 41,71306 bg0001028 sreden pirin alibotush * 68 934,39 23,56667 41,51056 bg0001030 rodopi zapadni * 272 851,4 24,22944 41,75278 bg0001031 rodopi sredni * 155 107,7 25,0531 41,83 bg0001040 zapadna stara planina i predbalkan * 219 753,3 22,9183 43,3411 bg0001042 iskarski prolom rzhana * 22 693,26 23,49694 43,02861 bg0001043 etropole baylovo * 27 448,25 23,88 42,72278 bg0001386 yadenitsa * 17 016,21 24,00639 42,105 bg0001389 sredna gora * 110 373,6 24,28083 42,58639 bg0001493 tsentralen balkan bufer * 138 363,8 24,74056 42,80083 de8236371 flyschberge bei bad wiessee * 956,48 0 11,6775 47,7125 de8238301 standort bungsplatz st.margarethen/brannenburg * 60,3 0 12,0756 47,7286 de8239371 hochriesgebiet und hangw lder im aschauer tal * 1 825,73 0 12,265 47,7431 de8239372 geigelstein und achentaldurchbruch * 3 207,23 0 12,3372 47,7103 de8240371 mettenhamer filz, s ssener und lanzinger moos mit extensivwiesen * 149,46 0 12,4442 47,7489 de8241371 extensivwiesen um ruhpolding 105,61 0 12,6272 47,7581 de8241372 stliche chiemgauer alpen * 12 932,87 0 12,67 47,7056 de8325301 lindenberger moos * 101,77 0 9,8667 47,6047 de8332303 bergsturzgebiet im gsott * 91,52 0 11,0953 47,6497 de8332304 ammertaler wiesmahdh nge * 449,43 0 11,0561 47,6156 de8332371 moore im oberen ammertal * 628,03 0 11,0461 47,6086 de8333371 extensivwiesen um glentleiten bei gro weil * 132,27 0 11,2928 47,6653 de8334302 probstalm und probstenwand * 100,88 0 11,4861 47,6583 de8334372 kammmolchlebensraum bei kochel * 31,64 0 11,3864 47,6631 de8334373 kesselberggebiet * 674,37 0 11,3458 47,6244 de8336371 mangfallgebirge * 14 916,39 0 11,8572 47,6283 de8342301 nationalpark berchtesgaden * 21 338,4 0 12,925 47,5528 de8342302 nsg aschau , nsg schwarzbach und schwimmendes moos * 808,78 0 12,7803 47,6519 de8343303 untersberg * 3 526,21 0 12,985 47,6856 de8343371 moore und extensivwiesen bei berchtesgaden * 31,91 0 12,9639 47,6308 de8343372 extensivwiesen in der ramsau * 41,51 0 12,9389 47,6119 de8424302 naturschutzgebiet rohrachschlucht * 169,79 0 9,8117 47,59 de8426301 oberes wei achtal mit lanzen-, katzen- und mittelbach * 708,73 0 10,0533 47,5192 de8426302 nagelfluhkette hochgrat-steineberg * 1 989,42 0 10,1075 47,5056 de8427301 gr nten * 146,21 0 10,3175 47,5489 de8429303 kienberg mit magerrasen im tal der steinacher achen * 623,53 0 10,5222 47,5636 de8429304 aggenstein * 129,87 0 10,5517 47,5378 de8430303 falkenstein, alatsee, faulenbacher- und lechtal * 977,85 0 10,7133 47,5536 de8431371 ammergebirge * 27 588,85 0 10,9372 47,55 de8432301 loisachtal zwischen farchant und eschenlohe * 691,28 0 11,1583 47,5694 de8432302 auerberg, m hlberg * 296,71 0 11,1558 47,5753 de8433301 karwendel mit isar * 19 581,75 0 11,3433 47,4906 de8433371 estergebirge * 6 075,43 0 11,2003 47,5428 de8434372 jachenau und extensivwiesen bei fleck * 1 438,73 0 11,5019 47,61 de8525301 h derichmoore * 88,84 0 9,9936 47,4939 de8526301 wildflusssystem bolgenach * 163,81 0 10,1344 47,4444 de8526302 piesenkopfmoore * 781,49 0 10,1389 47,4167 de8527301 h rnergruppe * 1 179,17 0 10,1692 47,4656 de8527371 sch nberger ach * 29,69 0 10,2164 47,4364 de8528301 allg uer hochalpen * 21 222,9 0 10,3225 47,3889 de8532371 wettersteingebirge * 4 256,15 0 11,09 47,4169 de8533301 mittenwalder buckelwiesen * 1 904,09 0 11,2411 47,4603 de8626301 hoher ifen * 2 453,38 0 10,1483 47,3806 de8627301 engenkopfmoor * 94,24 0 10,2094 47,3967 de8627302 schlappolt * 196,08 0 10,2297 47,3631 es0000016 ordesa y monte perdido * 15 797,28 0 -0,0319 42,64 es0000018 prepirineu central catal * 57 074,77 0 1,6883 42,255 es0000022 aig estortes * 56 120,73 0 0,9454 42,5536 es0000123 larra-aztaparreta * 3 922,85 0 -0,7914 42,9392 es0000126 roncesvalles-selva de irati * 18 077,73 0 -1,0599 42,9676 es0000129 sierra de artxuga, zarikieta y montes de areta * 19 530,14 0 -1,3317 42,842 es0000130 sierra de arrigorrieta y pe a ezkaurre * 6 377,99 0 -0,886 42,8305 es0000149 posets maladeta * 34 433,56 0 0,5308 42,64 es2200009 larrondo-lakartxela * 2 614,1 0 -0,8859 42,9381 es2200012 r o salazar 414,55 0 -1,2477 42,6566 es2200018 belate * 26 067,44 0 -1,6689 43,0617 es2200019 monte alduide * 9 028,69 0 -1,4561 43,0307 es2200025 sistema fluvial de los r os irati, urrobi y erro * 1 101,04 0 -1,3701 42,7438 es2200027 r os eska y bini s * 288,67 0 -0,8651 42,9241 es2410001 los valles sur * 22 913,27 0 -0,7686 42,7439 es2410002 pico y turberas del anayet 408,3368 0 -0,4394 42,7844 es2410003 los valles * 27 066,2 0 -0,68 42,81 es2410005 guara norte * 12 763,01 0 -0,23 42,29 es2410006 bujaruelo garganta de los navarros * 9 775,003 0 -0,14 42,71 es2410008 garganta de obarra * 735,6757 0 0,62 42,41 es2410009 congosto de ventamillo * 247,0025 0 0,46 42,49 es2410010 monte pacino * 509,7923 0 -0,35 42,75 es2410011 cabecera del r o aguas limpias * 3 045,644 0 -0,29 42,82 es2410013 macizo de cotiella * 8 275,447 0 0,32 42,52 es2410014 garcipollera selva de villan a * 3 898,902 0 -0,48 42,64 es2410019 r o cinca (valle de pineta) 117,7611 0 0,12 42,65 es2410021 curso alto del r o arag n 145,9823 0 -0,5467 42,6642 es2410022 cuevas de villan a 0,1239 0 -0,5278 42,6858 es2410023 collarada y canal de ip * 4 027,093 0 -0,4908 42,7294 es2410024 telera acumuer * 5 552,785 0 -0,3311 42,6394 es2410025 sierra y ca ones de guara * 34 662,63 0 -0,1667 42,2603 es2410027 r o aur n 91,0864 0 -0,425 40,6422 es2410029 tende era * 12 814,66 0 -0,2108 42,6608 es2410031 foz escarrilla cucuraza * 1 609,912 0 -0,3131 42,7489 es2410040 puertos de panticosa, bramatuero y brazatos * 3 021,626 0 -0,1914 42,7822 es2410044 puerto de otal cotefablo * 1 963,884 0 -0,2103 42,6069 es2410045 sobrepuerto * 3 468,909 0 -0,2356 42,5678 es2410046 r o sera * 1 758,514 0 0,4706 42,5794 es2410048 r o ara * 2 019,037 0 -0,1056 42,6308 es2410049 r o is bena * 1 992,665 0 0,5742 42,3236 es2410050 cuenca del r o yesa * 5 599,812 0 0,0478 42,5256 es2410051 cuenca del r o air s * 3 741,999 0 0,1056 42,5667 es2410052 alto valle del cinca * 14 590,56 0 0,1903 42,68 es2410053 chistau * 10 678,68 0 0,3078 42,5883 es2410054 sierra ferrera * 8 023,237 0 0,2669 42,4808 es2410055 sierra de arro * 1 459,9 0 0,2303 42,4219 es2410056 sierra de ch a congosto de seira * 8 666,858 0 0,4161 42,51 es2410059 el turb n * 2 822,036 0 0,5067 42,4194 es2410150 cueva de los moros 0,0625 0 -0,5278 42,6861 es2410154 turberas del macizo de los infiernos 50,2655 0 -0,2697 42,7708 es2410155 turberas de acumuer 13,3023 0 -0,4283 42,7072 es5120002 cap aleres del ter i del freser * 12 480,32 0 2,2167 42,3846 es5120003 serra cavallera * 6 381,86 0 2,2334 42,2903 es5120019 riberes de l'alt ter * 409,83 41 2,294 42,2324 es5120022 riu duran * 102,73 91 1,7955 42,4235 es5120024 montgrony * 3 803,8 0 2,0831 42,2822 es5120026 tossa plana de lles-puigpedr s * 13 305,56 0 1,6695 42,4497 es5120027 rasos de tubau 644,53 0 2,0472 42,2239 es5120028 vall del rigart * 210,26 0 2,1203 42,3133 es5130002 riu verneda * 75,47 97 1,6711 42,3908 es5130003 alt pallars * 77 183,2 0 1,034 42,7159 es5130004 baish aran * 12 444,98 0 0,788 42,799 es5130005 era artiga de lin eth portilhon * 7 047,87 0 0,7168 42,6713 es5130006 estanho de vielha 28,88 0 0,8144 42,7095 es5130007 riberes de l'alt segre * 216,62 23 1,8499 42,3915 es5130010 serra de boumort-collegats * 18 414,83 0 1,1003 42,2367 es5130011 riu de la llosa * 84,12 0 1,6992 42,45 es5130012 vall alta de serradell-serra de sant gerv s * 12 920,99 0 0,8124 42,2305 es5130015 serres del montsec, sant mamet i mitjana * 32 423,71 0 0,8722 42,0303 es5130019 estany de montcort s * 45,01 0 0,9947 42,3319 es5130022 la torrassa * 59,58 0 1,1331 42,6064 es5130023 bene dor * 416,33 0 1,5653 42,3719 es5130024 la faiada de malp s i cambatiri 1 280,7 0 0,7739 42,3817 es5130026 serra de prada-castell s * 3 735,9 0 1,3044 42,2711 es5130029 serres de queralt i els tossals-aigua d'ora * 8 682,94 0 1,67 42,0592 es5130034 riu garona * 212,75 27 0,7414 42,7369 fi1300101 pallas-ounastunturi * 59426 23,27111 68,86417 fi1300102 malla * 3089 20,06778 69,94889 fi1300103 p yrisj rven er maa * 146834 24,35583 68,32194 fi1300105 k sivarren er maa * 264892 21,16944 68,7625 fi1300107 jietanasvuoma * 1511 22,44056 68,08472 fi1300108 iiton palsasuot * 66 21,35583 68,1525 fi1300111 sotkavuoma * 2602 23,35583 68,40667 fi1300112 saanan luonnonsuojelualue * 240 20,10167 69,50833 fi1300118 tarvantovaara * 66403 22,61 68,06778 fi1300201 lemmenjoen kansallispuisto * 285990 25,38972 68,98278 fi1300202 muotkatunturin er maa * 158208 26,69472 69,86417 fi1300204 v ts rin er maa * 157368 28,08472 69,66083 fi1300207 pieran marin j nk * 2643 27,74556 69,25417 fi1300601 puljun er maa * 56351 24,01694 68,52528 fi1302001 kevo * 71406 26,99972 69,99972 fi1302002 kaldoaivin er maa * 351633 27,05083 69,52528 fi1302003 paistunturin er maa * 159770 26,94889 69,99972 fi1302004 pulmankij rvi 1623 27,915 69,94889 fi1302008 vetsijoen suistolehto 14 27,57611 69,94889 fi1302009 kirkkotupien niitty * 1,1 27,55917 69,83028 fi1302010 luomusjoen kuolpuna 2 26,16944 69,71167 fi1302011 v limaan kentt * 2 27,55917 70,18639 fi1302012 pappilan niitty * 3,2 27,54222 69,72861 fi1302013 mieraslompolon kentt * 2,2 27,35583 69,59306 fr7200742 massif du moulle de jaout * 16600 -0,40667 43,03861 fr7200743 massif du ger et du lurien * 14150 -0,36306 42,83111 fr7200744 massif de sesques et de l'ossau * 25650 -0,50028 42,9 fr7200745 massif du montagnon * 8871 -0,51778 43,02972 fr7200746 massif de l'anie et d'espelungu re * 14461 -0,6425 42,89583 fr7200747 massif du layens * 5750 -0,64417 43,0525 fr7200749 montagnes du bar tous * 14600 -0,79038 43,01498 fr7200750 montagnes de la haute soule * 14750 -0,89819 42,99755 fr7200751 montagnes du pic des escaliers * 8600 -0,98413 43,0554 fr7200752 massif des arbailles * 13000 -1,01986 43,12431 fr7200753 for t d'iraty * 2500 -1,07507 43,03008 fr7200754 montagnes de saint-jean-pied-de-port * 12567 -1,19778 43,07278 fr7200781 gave de pau * 8212 -0,65028 43,40222 fr7200786 la nive * 9473 -1,37981 43,26424 fr7200790 le saison (cours d'eau) * 2200 -0,87361 43,2375 fr7200791 le gave d'oloron (cours d'eau) et marais de labastide-villefranche * 2450 -0,85556 43,37472 fr7200792 le gave d'aspe et le lourdios (cours d'eau) * 1600 -0,60806 43,07444 fr7200793 le gave d'ossau * 2300 -0,41833 43,07806 fr7300821 vall e de l'isard, mail de bulard, pics de mauberm , de serre-haute et du crab re * 6428 0,92056 42,83333 fr7300822 vall e du riberot et massif du mont valier * 7745 1,06333 42,81167 fr7300825 mont ceint, mont b as, tourbi re de bernadouze * 2218 1,41 42,79694 fr7300827 vall e de l'aston * 14962 1,66 42,69333 fr7300829 qui s calcaires de tarascon-sur-ari ge et grotte de la petite caougno 2484 1,65056 42,82194 fr7300831 qu rigut, laurenti, rabassolles, balbonne, la bruyante, haute vall e de l'ori ge * 10255 2,03417 42,67472 fr7300838 grotte de montseron * 1 1,32802 43,02 fr7300839 grotte du ker de massat * 1 1,32459 42,9 fr7300841 queirs du mas d'azil et de camarade, grottes du mas d'azil et de la carri re de sabarat * 1629 1,33556 43,07972 fr7300842 pechs de foix, soula et roquefixade, grotte de l'herm * 2211 1,65944 42,94694 fr7300880 haute vall e d'o ' * 3407 0,5025 42,73056 fr7300881 haute vall e de la pique * 8251 0,59333 42,72417 fr7300883 haute vall e de la garonne * 11134 0,78 42,87778 fr7300884 zones rupestres x rothermiques du bassin de marignac, saint-b at, pic du gar, montagne de ri * 7680 0,72667 42,95 fr7300920 granquet-pibeste et soum d'ech * 7275 -0,15361 43,05833 fr7300921 gabizos (et vall e d'arrens, versant sud-est du gabizos) * 2997 -0,27167 42,92889 fr7300922 gaves de pau et de cauterets (et gorge de cauterets) * 482 -0,0895 42,98624 fr7300923 moun n de cauterets, pic de cabaliros * 3703 -0,14222 42,92417 fr7300924 p gu re, barbat, cambal s * 4651 -0,17694 42,85194 fr7300925 gaube, vignemale * 7395 -0,14306 42,81028 fr7300926 ossoue, asp , cestr de * 5226 -0,05417 42,76167 fr7300927 estaub , gavarnie, troumouse et barroude * 9479 0,055 42,7325 fr7300928 pic long campbielh * 8174 0,11806 42,79056 fr7300929 n ouvielle * 6191 0,15056 42,865 fr7300930 bar ges, ayr , piquette * 1451 0,09306 42,87306 fr7300931 lac bleu l viste * 6942 0,035 42,92444 fr7300932 liset de hount blanque * 4059 0,16917 42,95667 fr7300933 hautes-baronnies, coume de pailhas * 300 0,25 43,00528 fr7300934 rioumajou et moudang * 9522 0,28583 42,74028 fr7300935 haut-louron: aygues tortes, caillauas, gourgs blancs, gorges de clarabide, pics des pichad res et d'estiou re, montagne de tramadits * 5439 0,42222 42,73306 fr7301822 garonne, ari ge, hers, salat, pique et neste * 10068 1,83139 43,08389 fr8201680 landes, pelouses, for ts et prairies humides de lus-la-croix-haute * 3639 5,72685 44,6768 fr8201681 gervanne et rebord occidental du vercors * 18150 5,15847 44,8155 fr8201682 rebord m ridional du vercors * 4724 5,24598 44,8725 fr8201692 monts du matin, combe laval et val sainte-marie * 2339 5,18959 44,9883 fr8201696 tuffi res du vercors * 33 5,58807 44,836 fr8201698 contamines montjoie miage tr la t te * 5547 6,74972 45,77917 fr8201699 aiguilles rouges * 9065 6,85528 45,98167 fr8201700 haut giffre * 12431 6,82417 46,04028 fr8201701 les aravis * 8907 6,55111 45,9675 fr8201702 plateau de beauregard * 413 6,39028 45,88417 fr8201703 massif de la tournette * 4658 6,27667 45,83361 fr8201704 les frettes massif des gli res * 4793 6,33639 45,98556 fr8201705 massif du bargy * 3847 6,47125 45,9985 fr8201706 roc d'enfer * 4047 6,59832 46,1873 fr8201707 plateau de lo x * 1231 6,65332 46,1246 fr8201708 mont de grange 1254 6,80439 46,2611 fr8201709 cornettes de bise * 1551 6,78417 46,32083 fr8201710 massif des voirons * 978 6,35417 46,20722 fr8201712 le sal ve * 4427 6,16306 46,10917 fr8201715 vall e de l'arve * 757 6,34825 46,1112 fr8201719 delta de la dranse * 53 6,51583 46,39861 fr8201720 cluse du lac d'annecy * 282 6,22639 45,79222 fr8201722 zones humides du bas chablais * 282 6,435 46,33556 fr8201723 plateau gavot * 165 6,65528 46,37694 fr8201724 marais de chilly et de marival * 38 6,3025 46,29194 fr8201732 tourbi res du luitel et leur bassin versant * 309 5,85694 45,08944 fr8201733 cembraie, pelouses, lacs et tourbi res de belledonne, de chamrousse au grand colon * 2662 5,92603 45,1335 fr8201735 landes, tourbi res et habitats rocheux du massif du taillefer * 3697 5,91756 45,0517 fr8201736 marais laiche bicolore, prairies de fauche et habitats rocheux du vallon du ferrand et du plateau d'emparis * 2412 6,2075 45,0758 fr8201738 plaine de bourg d'oisans et ses versants * 3473 6,02721 45,0643 fr8201740 hauts de chartreuse * 4423 5,88822 45,3923 fr8201741 ubacs du charmant som et gorges du guiers mort * 2329 5,755 45,3311 fr8201743 la bourne * 2805 5,39347 45,0694 fr8201744 hauts plateaux et contreforts du vercors oriental * 20257 5,50882 44,849 fr8201745 pelouses, for ts remarquables et habitats rocheux du plateau du sornin * 1312 5,60879 45,1998 fr8201747 massif de l'obiou et gorges de la souloise * 3743 5,88806 44,7775 fr8201751 massif de la muzelle * 16896 6,06266 44,9288 fr8201753 for ts, landes et prairies de fauche des versants du col d'ornon * 4814 5,96826 44,9823 fr8201770 r seau de zones humides, pelouses, landes et falaises de l'avant-pays savoyard * 3151 5,7107 45,6644 fr8201772 r seau de zones humides de l'albanais * 599 5,95438 45,7667 fr8201773 r seau de zones humides dans la combe de savoie et la basse vall e de l'is re * 819 6,18944 45,57083 fr8201774 tourbi re des creusates * 12 6,02944 45,68694 fr8201775 rebord m ridional du massif des bauges * 1170 6,02417 45,52472 fr8201776 tourbi re et lac des saisies * 288 6,51889 45,77083 fr8201777 adrets de tarentaise * 983 6,69013 45,5964 fr8201778 landes, prairies et habitats rocheux du massif du mont thabor * 4790 6,56723 45,1271 fr8201779 formations foresti res et herbac es des alpes internes * 1 560,1 6,87 45,29389 fr8201780 r seau de vallons d'altitude caricion * 9516 7,00611 45,48694 fr8201781 r seau de zones humides et alluviales des hurti res * 508 6,29556 45,49306 fr8201782 perron des encombres * 2 030,2 6,43306 45,28222 fr8201783 massif de la vanoise * 54030 6,88333 45,39167 fr8202002 partie orientale du massif des bauges * 14486 6,22472 45,66944 fr8202003 massif de la lauzi re * 10052 6,4271 45,4874 fr8202004 mont colombier * 2178 6,11911 45,6449 fr8202009 lac l man * 1376 6,37563 46,3561 fr9101468 bassin du rebenty * 8567 1,9925 42,78 fr9101470 haute vall e de l'aude et bassin de l'aiguette * 17055 2,18611 42,77028 fr9101471 capcir, carlit et campcardos * 39688 1,93222 42,56889 fr9101472 massif du puigmal * 8784 2,12667 42,43944 fr9101473 massif de madres-coronat * 21363 2,24222 42,61833 fr9101475 massif du canigou * 11746 2,35833 42,46972 fr9101476 conque de la preste * 8436 2,42056 42,41778 fr9102010 sites chiropt res des pyr n es orientales * 2437 2,29444 42,50833 fr9301497 plateau d'emparis goleon * 7439 6,29333 45,0875 fr9301498 combeynot lautaret ecrins * 9924 6,41889 44,98556 fr9301499 clar e * 25681 6,61889 45,01806 fr9301502 steppique durancien et queyrassin * 19658 6,62528 44,67222 fr9301503 rochebrune izoard vall e de la cerveyrette * 26801 6,6775 44,79667 fr9301504 haut guil mont viso val preveyre * 18833 7,00667 44,71639 fr9301505 vallon des bans vall e du fournel * 8823 6,38833 44,78056 fr9301506 valgaudemar * 9946 6,19333 44,77889 fr9301509 piolit pic de chabri res * 1596 6,28556 44,59167 fr9301511 d voluy durbon charance champsaur * 35530 5,91417 44,61444 fr9301519 le buech * 2426 5,83389 44,29667 fr9301523 bois de morgon for t de boscodon bragousse * 2517 6,41889 44,495 fr9301524 haute ubaye massif du chambeyron * 14037 6,86083 44,57639 fr9301525 coste plane champerous * 1508 6,43667 44,45444 fr9301526 la tour des sagnes vallon des terres pleines orrenaye * 5059 6,7825 44,35444 fr9301529 dormillouse lavercq * 6383 6,52 44,33833 fr9301530 cheval blanc montagne de boules barre des dourbes * 8258 6,43556 44,11944 fr9301533 l'asse * 21844 6,36778 43,94806 fr9301535 montagne de val-haut clues de barles clues de verdaches * 13197 6,28167 44,26861 fr9301546 lac saint-l ger * 5,25 6,33528 44,42028 fr9301547 grand coyer * 6233 6,70833 44,08611 fr9301549 entraunes * 19751 6,79917 44,14389 fr9301550 sites chauves souris de la haute tin e * 1787 6,92528 44,25639 fr9301552 adret de pra gaze 108 6,85083 44,28028 fr9301554 sites chauves souris castellet-les-sausses et gorges de daluis * 3384 6,80222 44,01778 fr9301556 massif du lauvet d'ilonse et des quatre cantons dome de barrot gorges du cians * 15071 7,05222 44,05333 fr9301559 le mercantour * 67947 7,18083 44,14639 fr9301560 mont chajol * 1427 7,53389 44,11889 fr9301561 marguareis la brigue fontan saorge * 6327 7,69417 44,08083 fr9301562 sites sp l omantes de roquebilli re * 417 7,30028 44,02583 fr9301566 sites chauves souris de breil-sur-roya * 2497 7,52972 43,92861 fr9302002 montagne de seymuit cr te de la scie * 1401 6,24278 44,41889 fr9302005 la bendola * 1063 7,5825 43,97056 hr2000004 bara eva pilja donja 0,7833 15,72293 44,98401 hr2000011 budina pilja 0,7833 15,36122 44,71695 hr2000020 podru je oko ulumove pe ine 1 209,642 16,37325 43,99004 hr2000026 dumen i a pilja 0,7833 15,66945 45,02471 hr2000066 bo i eva pilja 0,7833 15,77676 45,00003 hr2000078 lu ka pilja 0,7833 15,09398 45,22469 hr2000093 ostrvi ka pilja 0,7833 15,459 44,55714 hr2000095 p elina pilja 0,7833 15,5681 44,52231 hr2000098 pe ina 0,7833 15,32779 44,79532 hr2000106 ponor ponikve ii 0,7833 14,91557 45,38707 hr2000110 pustinja pilja 0,7833 14,80912 45,37217 hr2000118 samogradi pilja 0,7833 15,26579 44,7523 hr2000119 sini i pilja 0,7833 15,17808 44,99069 hr2000149 pilja kod stare su ice 0,7833 14,99797 45,39058 hr2000447 nacionalni park risnjak * 6 345,035 14,651 45,431 hr2000591 klek * 864,3873 15,14767 45,25918 hr2000592 ogulinsko-pla ansko podru je * 33 109,34 15,3 45,193 hr2000594 povremeno jezero blata * 807,5053 15,4076 45,01761 hr2000605 nacionalni park sjeverni velebit * 11 157,29 14,9741 44,76221 hr2000609 dolina dretulje 590,7671 15,38687 45,07745 hr2000632 krbavsko polje * 14 043,51 15,72279 44,57239 hr2000633 crna ko polje * 259,7324 15,16426 45,07055 hr2000634 stajni ko polje * 507,2128 15,23616 45,03771 hr2000635 gacko polje * 6 870,431 15,29962 44,85342 hr2000642 kupa * 5 363,064 15,642 45,479 hr2000643 obru * 2 716,956 14,48393 45,43622 hr2000645 bjelolasica * 1 671,191 14,98789 45,2551 hr2000646 polje lug 722,8473 15,06045 45,14106 hr2000648 dre ni ko polje * 308,4269 15,10398 45,15713 hr2000652 jasena ko polje 312,6637 15,03563 45,24597 hr2000654 li ke jesenice 463,3656 15,44108 44,98159 hr2000667 medvje a pilja 0,7833 14,75805 45,36337 hr2000707 gornje jelenje prema platku * 261,9713 14,55745 45,40139 hr2000755 hajdova hi a 0,7833 14,79231 45,45687 hr2000782 re ice 7,2064 14,50178 45,47109 hr2000854 pleteno iznad n. vinodolskog * 1 182,459 14,85782 45,18095 hr2000871 nacionalni park paklenica * 9 507,557 15,4878 44,3421 hr2000876 crni vrh kod vrhovina 1 405,852 15,40542 44,88255 hr2000879 lapa ko polje * 2 227,442 15,95477 44,5465 hr2000917 kr i 1 951,609 16,25232 44,03043 hr2000981 izvor jablan 0,7833 15,89856 44,27916 hr2001012 li ko polje * 53 512,95 15,42401 44,53434 hr2001025 mati poljana * 228,8371 14,8994 45,28488 hr2001041 gomance * 214,9434 14,42707 45,50189 hr2001042 li polje * 732,5718 14,74077 45,27658 hr2001049 krbavica * 431,8242 15,63086 44,71262 hr2001058 li ka plje ivica * 36 682,75 15,83264 44,65935 hr2001069 kanjon une 830,0974 16,136 44,428 hr2001113 kukuruzovi eva pilja 0,7833 15,70272 44,91481 hr2001126 rokina bezdana * 104,9479 15,19139 45,06948 hr2001127 markarova pilja * 114,1658 15,25863 45,0334 hr2001128 anti pilja * 81,1435 15,31694 44,95685 hr2001148 dazdaland jama 0,7833 14,52011 45,56125 hr2001150 izvor gerov ice 0,7833 14,67698 45,52883 hr2001153 stupina jama 0,7833 14,78768 45,24218 hr2001156 pilja pod ma kovom dragom 0,7833 15,02406 45,261 hr2001158 izvor kama nik 0,7833 15,05999 45,34578 hr2001180 panjkov ponor-vari akova pilja sustav 0,7833 15,72372 45,0158 hr2001181 izvor bakovac 0,7833 15,74104 44,34953 hr2001227 potok gerov ica * 7,5953 14,644 45,519 hr2001253 po tak * 2 737,891 16,13 44,221 hr2001254 dolac sekuli a * 26,4948 15,75382 44,37165 hr2001255 bulji * 199,6669 15,91066 44,41534 hr2001256 me ugorje stru nica * 420,0814 15,89837 44,51657 hr2001257 potok mala belica 30,6506 14,807 45,464 hr2001267 ri ica 177,2624 15,735 44,349 hr2001268 otu a 35,1273 15,877 44,36 hr2001269 obsenica 40,6394 15,658 44,368 hr2001272 jadova 95,4568 15,512 44,521 hr2001282 dio kupe * 455,7122 14,72617 45,52295 hr2001294 bruvno * 117,6356 15,85895 44,36429 hr2001295 jezerane * 21,0951 15,19058 45,05074 hr2001299 bijele i samarske stijene 1 118,77 14,95079 45,22665 hr2001314 izvori ni dio cetine s pa kim i vrli kim poljem 1 743,527 16,422 43,955 hr2001317 cret kod klepine dulibe 7,362 15,06521 44,68027 hr2001324 bjelopolje 953,8453 15,77098 44,6956 hr2001332 vrhovinsko polje 1 600,911 15,46985 44,83693 hr2001340 podru je oko ku trovke 3 248,668 15,21325 45,33865 hr2001344 novkovi i bosnjaku a * 230,4111 16,26769 44,14068 hr2001345 vra ji prolaz i zeleni vir * 246,1163 14,89613 45,4284 hr2001351 podru je oko kupice * 2 471,131 14,85983 45,4308 hr2001353 lokve-sunger-fu ine 11504 14,72155 45,34735 hr2001373 lisac * 9 201,575 15,9918 44,35529 hr2001377 sun erac 3,0072 15,11112 44,63204 hr2001398 daba nica srebrenica * 4,7002 16,084 44,354 hr2001413 ume kod skrada 1 342,045 14,91 45,451 hr2001417 velika belica * 38,4948 14,78412 45,47991 hr2001430 golubinjak 51,2823 14,76603 45,35298 hr2001431 lividraga 25,0735 14,58578 45,47736 hr2001432 lug jasenak 95,2963 15,02773 45,23444 hr2001433 bjeljevina 146,4741 14,87183 45,39067 hr2001438 jama kod umarske ku e 0,7833 14,92633 45,33585 hr2001439 jama kod lugarnice 0,7833 15,09259 45,32785 hr2001440 pilja pod zimzelom 0,7833 15,11548 45,28195 hr2001441 bezdan pod vu jakom 0,7833 15,01715 45,09145 hr2001442 lasi a pilja 0,7833 15,09114 44,89408 hr2001504 gornji tok korane 223,4215 15,784 44,994 hr2001508 prva brizi eva jama 0,7833 14,489 45,529 hr5000019 gorski kotar i sjeverna lika * 217 445,4 14,88161 45,2838 hr5000020 nacionalni park plitvi ka jezera * 29 797,14 15,58458 44,85326 hr5000022 park prirode velebit * 182 852,4 15,237 44,483 hr5000028 dinara * 46 254,93 16,59439 43,87855 it1110006 orsiera rocciavr * 10956 0 7,133008 45,06174 it1110007 laghi di avigliana * 414 0 7,386147 45,06519 it1110008 madonna della neve sul monte lera * 62 0 7,4678 45,1778 it1110010 gran bosco di salbertrand * 3712 0 6,9222 45,0581 it1110013 monti pelati e torre cives 145 0 7,7433 45,4158 it1110021 laghi di ivrea * 1599 0 7,893333 45,48917 it1110022 stagno di oulx * 84 0 6,8172 45,0361 it1110026 champlas colle sestriere * 1050 0 6,849722 44,95194 it1110027 boscaglie di tasso di giaglione (val clarea) * 340 0 6,959167 45,15889 it1110029 pian della mussa (balme) * 3554 0 7,154444 45,29722 it1110030 oasi xerotermiche della val di susa-orrido di chianocco * 1250 0 7,120833 45,15139 it1110031 valle thuras * 978 0 6,859444 44,89361 it1110032 pra barant * 4120 0 7,059444 44,75583 it1110033 stazioni di myricaria germanica * 63 0 7,141189 44,80341 it1110038 col basset (sestriere) 271 0 6,874444 44,98222 it1110039 rocciamelone * 1966 0 7,090556 45,17444 it1110040 oasi xerotermica di oulx auberge * 1070 0 6,832778 45,05528 it1110042 oasi xerotermica di oulx amazas * 339 0 6,822222 45,01917 it1110043 pendici del monte chaberton * 329 0 6,7775 44,95722 it1110044 bardonecchia val fredda * 1686 0 6,804722 45,09861 it1110045 bosco di pian pr (ror ) * 93 0 7,191667 44,79694 it1110048 grotta del pugnetto * 19 1 7,4136 45,2728 it1110049 les arnaud e punta quattro sorelle 1328 0 6,663611 45,08167 it1110052 oasi xerotermica di puys beaulard 468 0 6,73556 45,04694 it1110053 valle della ripa (argentera) * 327 0 6,915556 44,89194 it1110055 arnodera colle montabone * 112 0 7,055833 45,12917 it1110057 serra di ivrea * 4572 0 7,948889 45,49 it1110058 cima fournier e lago nero 640 0 6,793611 44,90389 it1110080 val troncea * 10130 0 6,978889 44,97583 it1110081 monte musin e laghi di caselette * 1524 0 7,4678 45,1208 it1120003 monte fenera * 3348 0 8,346667 45,70278 it1120006 val mastallone * 1882 0 8,159444 45,91639 it1120028 alta val sesia * 7545 0 7,8989 45,8964 it1130002 val sessera * 10787 0 8,037778 45,69694 it1140003 campello monti * 548 0 8,221111 45,93889 it1140004 alta val formazza * 5744 0 8,436389 46,40361 it1140006 greto torrente toce tra domodossola e villadossola * 746 0 8,279167 46,05833 it1140007 boleto m.te avigno 390 0 8,353056 45,78389 it1140011 val grande * 11855 0 8,4575 46,04083 it1140016 alpi veglia e devero monte giove * 15119 0 8,2525 46,31111 it1160016 stazione di muschi calcarizzanti c.ba seviana e c.ba barmarossa * 1,61 0 7,298 44,419 it1160017 stazione di linum narbonense 8,28 0 7,28 44,421 it1160018 sorgenti del maira, bosco di saretto, rocca provenzale * 727 0 6,915833 44,49639 it1160020 bosco di bagnasco * 381 0 8,077222 44,27639 it1160021 gruppo del tenibres * 5450 0 7,022778 44,30417 it1160023 vallone di orgials colle della lombarda * 530 0 7,141944 44,21861 it1160024 colle e lago della maddalena, val puriac * 1834 0 6,912222 44,39361 it1160026 faggete di pamparato, tana del forno, grotta delle turbiglie e grotte di bossea 2940 0 7,870278 44,26528 it1160035 m. antoroto * 863 0 7,916667 44,18833 it1160037 grotta di rio martino * 0,3 2 7,146328 44,69819 it1160040 stazioni di euphorbia valliniana * 207 0 7,176111 44,51861 it1160041 boschi e colonie di chirotteri di staffarda * 666 0 7,438 44,718 it1160056 alpi marittime * 33672 0 7,3628 44,2014 it1160057 alte valli pesio e tanaro * 11278 0 7,698333 44,17556 it1160058 gruppo del monviso e bosco dell'alev * 7232 0 7,096667 44,64556 it1160065 comba di castelmagno * 622 0 7,245 44,42 it1160067 vallone dell'arma * 796 0 7,286 44,33 it1201000 parco nazionale del gran paradiso * 71042 0 7,301667 45,51889 it1201010 ambienti calcarei d'alta quota della valle di rh mes * 1593 0 7,074444 45,50944 it1202000 parco naturale mont avic * 5750 0 7,571111 45,64611 it1203010 zona umida di morgex * 30 0 7,054954 45,75138 it1203020 lago di lolair * 28 0 7,136111 45,69472 it1203030 formazioni steppiche della cote de gargantua * 19 0 7,294167 45,71778 it1203040 stagno di loson 4,55 0 7,554722 45,78056 it1203050 lago di villa * 27 0 7,691389 45,68667 it1203060 stagno di holay 3 0 7,809461 45,59744 it1203070 mont mars * 380 0 7,924167 45,64722 it1204010 ambienti glaciali del monte bianco * 12557 0 6,866111 45,83361 it1204032 talweg della val ferret * 120 0 7,018119 45,84774 it1204220 ambienti glaciali del gruppo del monte rosa * 8645 0 7,792778 45,90111 it1205000 ambienti d'alta quota delle combe thuilette e sozin * 356 0 6,955 45,67611 it1205010 ambienti d'alta quota della valgrisenche * 336 0 7,013889 45,54139 it1205020 ambienti d'alta quota del colle del gran san bernardo * 750 0 7,146944 45,86667 it1205030 pont d'ael * 183 0 7,221111 45,68167 it1205034 castello e miniere abbandonate di aymavilles 1,59 0 7,248209 45,70243 it1205050 ambienti xerici del mont torretta bellon * 49 0 7,238368 45,71998 it1205061 stazione di astragalus alopecurus di cogne * 36 0 7,311816 45,63696 it1205064 vallone del grauson * 489 0 7,384444 45,63889 it1205065 vallone dell'urtier * 1506 0 7,441593 45,60549 it1205070 zona umida di les iles di saint marcel * 35 0 7,433056 45,73722 it1205081 ambienti calcarei d'alta quota attorno al lago tsan * 453 0 7,538174 45,85591 it1205082 stagno di lo ditor * 22 0 7,564722 45,84833 it1205090 ambienti xerici di grand brison cly * 97 0 7,5825 45,75333 it1205100 ambienti d'alta quota della vall e de l'alleigne * 1103 0 7,602778 45,58806 it1205110 stazione di paeonia officinalis 33 0 7,783333 45,63222 it1313712 cima di piano cavallo bric cornia * 4486 0 7,7936 44,1131 it1314609 monte monega monte prearba * 3670 0 7,8131 44,0292 it1314610 monte saccarello monte front * 3927 0 7,7483 44,0558 it1314611 monte gerbonte * 2261 0 7,6939 44,0111 it1315421 monte toraggio monte pietravecchia * 2648 0 7,6678 43,9669 it1322122 croce della tia rio barchei * 660 0 8,1456 44,3328 it1322216 ronco di maglio * 1449 0 8,2497 44,3108 it1322217 bric tana bric mongarda * 168 0 8,2158 44,3503 it1322223 cave ferecchi * 37 0 8,2089 44,3756 it1323014 monte spinarda rio nero * 943 0 8,0886 44,2167 it1323021 bric zerbi * 711 0 8,1069 44,2783 it1323112 monte carmo monte settepani * 7575 0 8,1833 44,2178 it1323115 lago di osiglia * 409 0 8,1961 44,3006 it1323920 monte galero * 3194 0 8,045 44,1311 it2010001 lago di ganna * 106 0 8,825833 45,89694 it2010002 monte legnone e chiusarella * 751 0 8,813056 45,86361 it2010003 versante nord del campo dei fiori * 1312 0 8,761667 45,87972 it2010004 grotte del campo dei fiori * 894 0 8,775556 45,85889 it2010005 monte martica * 1057 0 8,813056 45,89056 it2010016 val veddasca * 4919 0 8,817778 46,06333 it2010018 monte sangiano * 195 0 8,645 45,878 it2010019 monti della valcuvia * 1629 0 8,708333 45,92 it2010020 torbiera di cavagnano 6,02 0 8,876 45,908 it2020001 lago di piano * 207 0 9,1625 46,03694 it2020002 sasso malascarpa * 328 0 9,328333 45,85056 it2020009 valle del dosso * 1652 0 9,233333 46,19361 it2020010 lago di segrino * 282 0 9,273333 45,83361 it2030001 grigna settentrionale * 1617 0 9,386944 45,95278 it2030002 grigna meridionale * 2732 0 9,391944 45,92139 it2030003 monte barro * 649 0 9,378889 45,83889 it2040001 val viera e cime di fopel * 836 0 10,12889 46,5825 it2040002 motto di livigno val saliente * 1251 0 10,102 46,569 it2040003 val federia * 1593 0 10,0825 46,5425 it2040004 valle alpisella * 1045 0 10,20667 46,55306 it2040005 valle della forcola * 212 0 10,049 46,45 it2040006 la vallaccia pizzo filone * 1982 0 10,17 46,49306 it2040007 passo e monte di foscagno * 1081 0 10,20517 46,4901 it2040008 cime di plator e monte delle scale * 1572 0 10,316 46,504 it2040009 valle di fraele * 1691 0 10,31722 46,54 it2040010 valle del braulio cresta di reit * 3559 0 10,4075 46,5075 it2040011 monte vago val di campo val nera * 2874 0 10,1003 46,44659 it2040012 val viola bormina ghiacciaio di cima dei piazzi * 5962 0 10,24278 46,42833 it2040013 val zebr gran zebr monte confinale * 3725 0 10,52222 46,47 it2040014 valle e ghiacciaio dei forni val cedec gran zebr cevedale * 6157 0 10,55639 46,42 it2040015 paluaccio di oga * 28 0 10,337 46,471 it2040016 monte di scerscen ghiacciai di scerscen monte motta * 9666 0 9,905833 46,34361 it2040017 disgrazia sissone * 3010 0 9,759722 46,29028 it2040018 val codera * 818 0 9,485 46,243 it2040019 bagni di masino pizzo badile * 2755 0 9,613611 46,25889 it2040020 val di mello piano di preda rossa * 5789 0 9,693611 46,26389 it2040021 val di togno pizzo scalino * 3150 0 9,946944 46,25556 it2040023 valle dei ratti * 928 0 9,533 46,198 it2040024 da monte belvedere a vallorda * 2119 0 10,17278 46,19611 it2040025 pian gembro * 78 0 10,15778 46,16278 it2040026 val lesina * 1184 0 9,478611 46,10556 it2040027 valle del bitto di gerola * 2458 0 9,510898 46,09352 it2040028 valle del bitto di albaredo * 3399 0 9,595 46,0825 it2040029 val tartano * 1451 0 9,695 46,061 it2040030 val madre * 1486 0 9,708 46,139 it2040031 val cervia * 1893 0 9,801 46,101 it2040032 valle del livrio * 2108 0 9,830833 46,1125 it2040033 val venina * 3644 0 9,917 46,068 it2040034 valle d'arigna e ghiacciaio di pizzo di coca * 3143 0 9,993333 46,11639 it2040035 val bondone val caronella * 1500 0 10,07389 46,11056 it2040036 val belviso * 766 0 10,113 46,069 it2040037 rifugio falk * 4,22 0 10,259 46,388 it2040038 val fontana * 4210 0 10,00861 46,25556 it2040039 val zerta * 1585 0 9,380833 46,35611 it2040040 val bodengo * 2555 0 9,280278 46,26306 it2040041 piano di chiavenna * 2514 0 9,408 46,251 it2040042 pian di spagna e lago di mezzola * 1715 0 9,423056 46,17667 it2060001 valtorta e valmoresca * 1682 0 9,62 46,024 it2060002 valle di piazzatorre isola di fondra * 2513 0 9,723056 45,98333 it2060003 alta val brembana laghi gemelli * 4251 0 9,839722 46,01361 it2060004 alta val di scalve * 7053 0 10,183 46,019 it2060005 val sedornia val zurio pizzo della presolana * 12962 0 10,01278 45,94917 it2060006 boschi del giovetto di paline * 597 0 10,1375 45,96222 it2060007 valle asinina * 1506 0 9,591 45,901 it2060008 valle parina * 2225 0 9,721944 45,90639 it2060009 val nossana cima di grem * 3369 0 9,863611 45,90083 it2060010 valle del freddo * 72 0 10,023 45,798 it2060011 canto alto e valle del giongo * 565 0 9,653333 45,76472 it2060012 boschi dell'astino e dell'allegrezza * 50 0 9,632783 45,70693 it2060016 valpredina e misma * 90 0 9,815556 45,72639 it2070001 torbiere del tonale 47 0 10,575 46,25333 it2070002 monte piccolo monte colmo * 412 0 10,38389 46,18833 it2070003 val rabbia e val galinera 1854 0 10,40528 46,16111 it2070004 monte marser corni di bos 2591 0 10,43583 46,09778 it2070005 pizzo badile alta val zumella * 2184 0 10,40778 46,00806 it2070006 pascoli di crocedomini alta val caffaro * 4603 0 10,41861 45,92694 it2070007 vallone del forcel rosso * 3067 0 10,50389 46,07528 it2070008 cresta monte colomb e cima barbignaga 156 0 10,40361 46,04861 it2070009 versanti dell'avio * 1678 0 10,47417 46,17639 it2070010 piz olda val malga 2069 0 10,37833 46,12278 it2070011 torbiera la goia 0,2 0 10,33589 46,1024 it2070012 torbiere di val braone * 68 0 10,39778 45,97028 it2070013 ghiacciaio dell'adamello 2976 0 10,52833 46,15944 it2070014 lago di pile 4 0 10,45306 46,01472 it2070015 monte cas cima di corlor * 166 0 10,74724 45,7495 it2070016 cima comer 314 0 10,67639 45,7075 it2070017 valli di san antonio * 4160 0 10,20944 46,15111 it2070018 altopiano di cariadeghe * 523 0 10,34611 45,59472 it2070019 sorgente funtan * 55 0 10,49417 45,66306 it2070021 valvestino * 6473 0 10,59972 45,76417 it2070022 corno della marogna * 3571 0 10,6895 45,805 it2070023 belvedere tri plane 26 0 10,37611 46,05667 it3110001 biotopo vegetazione steppica tartscher leiten * 38 0 10,5769 46,6819 it3110002 biotopo ontaneto di sluderno * 125 0 10,5819 46,6494 it3110004 biotopo ontaneto di cengles * 41 0 10,6375 46,6206 it3110005 biotopo ontaneto di oris * 46 0 10,6569 46,6247 it3110010 biotopo vegetazione steppica sonnenberg * 204 0 10,9531 46,65 it3110011 val di fosse nel parco naturale gruppo di tessa * 10087 0 10,9403 46,7336 it3110012 lacines catena del monteneve nel parco naturale gruppo di tessa * 8095 0 11,0931 46,8244 it3110013 biotopo delta del valsura * 33 0 11,1775 46,6283 it3110014 biotopo gisser auen * 14 0 11,3683 46,7619 it3110015 biotopo h hnerspiel * 144 0 11,4875 46,9414 it3110016 biotopo wiesermoos * 16 0 12,0956 47,0511 it3110017 parco naturale vedrette di ries aurina * 31330 0 12,0775 46,9389 it3110018 ontaneti dell'aurino * 36 0 11,95 46,8889 it3110019 biotopo rasner m ser * 25 0 12,0747 46,8075 it3110020 biotopo monte covolo alpe di nemes * 278 0 12,4172 46,6686 it3110022 biotopo ontaneto della rienza dobbiaco * 17 0 12,22 46,7214 it3110026 valle di funes sas de putia rasciesa nel parco naturale puez-odle * 5277 0 11,7885 46,633 it3110027 gardena valle lunga puez nel parco naturale puez-odle * 5396 0 11,8164 46,5836 it3110029 parco naturale dello sciliar catinaccio * 7292 0 11,5842 46,4983 it3110030 biotopo torbiera totes moos * 4,2 0 11,3812 46,4488 it3110031 biotopo torbiera w lfl * 10 0 11,411 46,4301 it3110032 biotopo torbiera tschingger * 3,08 0 11,3979 46,4343 it3110033 biotopo buche di ghiaccio 28 0 11,2478 46,4453 it3110034 biotopo lago di caldaro * 241 0 11,2628 46,3753 it3110035 biotopo castelfeder * 108 0 11,2883 46,3353 it3110036 parco naturale monte corno * 6848 0 11,3069 46,2883 it3110037 biotopo lago di favogna 9,69 0 11,1856 46,275 it3110038 ultimo solda nel parco nazionale dello stelvio * 27989 0 10,8056 46,5208 it3110039 ortles monte madaccio nel parco nazionale dello stelvio * 4188 0 10,5225 46,5314 it3110040 alpe di cavallaccio nel parco nazionale dello stelvio * 3517 0 10,5064 46,6328 it3110041 jaggl * 702 0 10,5578 46,7933 it3110042 prati aridi rocciosi di agumes * 0,34 0 10,5743 46,6241 it3110043 prati aridi rocciosi di sant'ottilia 0,12 0 10,618 46,6127 it3110044 biotopo sonnenberg vegetazione steppica schlanderser leiten * 25 0 10,7923 46,6283 it3110045 biotopo sonnenberg vegetazione steppica kortscher leiten * 56 0 10,7314 46,6369 it3110046 biotopo palude della volpe * 4,04 0 11,2389 46,503 it3110048 prati dell'armentara * 342 0 11,9267 46,6261 it3110049 parco naturale fanes senes braies * 25453 0 12,0567 46,6531 it3110050 parco naturale tre cime * 11892 0 12,2992 46,6667 it3110051 biotopo ahrau di stegona * 18 0 11,9275 46,805 it3110052 biotopo bigleidermoos biotop bigleidermoos * 5,04 0 11,342 46,3705 it3110053 biotopo tartscher b hel biotop tartscher b hel * 22 0 10,5591 46,6786 it3110054 gaulschlucht * 66 0 11,1262 46,6083 it3110055 schgumser m ser * 24 0 10,6538 46,6125 it3120001 alta val di rabbi * 4434 0 10,75722 46,43972 it3120002 alta val la mare * 5819 0 10,67222 46,41861 it3120003 alta val del monte * 4464 0 10,59111 46,3675 it3120015 tre cime monte bondone * 223 0 11,03722 46,00167 it3120017 campobrun * 426 0 11,13111 45,70528 it3120018 scanuppia * 529 0 11,16333 45,96333 it3120019 lago nero * 3,08 0 11,3154 46,2836 it3120020 palu' longa * 5,93 0 11,36833 46,29611 it3120021 lago delle buse 18 0 11,45472 46,17972 it3120022 palu' dei mugheri * 9,06 0 11,69611 46,29889 it3120023 sorte di bellamonte * 11 0 11,67222 46,30944 it3120024 zona umida valfloriana * 203 0 11,3825 46,22639 it3120027 canzenagol * 3,39 0 11,6077 46,2719 it3120028 pra delle nasse * 8,08 0 11,79057 46,2642 it3120029 sorgente resenzuola * 4,74 0 11,65959 46,0065 it3120030 fontanazzo * 54 0 11,6075 46,01611 it3120031 masi carretta * 3,02 0 11,6308 46,1067 it3120032 i mughi * 21 0 11,60806 46,0925 it3120033 palude di roncegno * 21 0 11,42583 46,05167 it3120034 paludi di sternigo * 24 0 11,265 46,14139 it3120035 laghestel di pine' * 91 0 11,22639 46,11583 it3120036 redebus * 10 0 11,31843 46,1388 it3120038 inghiaie * 30 0 11,31018 45,9967 it3120039 canneto di levico * 9,74 0 11,2793 46,0079 it3120040 lago pudro * 13 0 11,22417 46,07861 it3120041 lago costa * 3,83 0 11,2375 46,07556 it3120042 canneti di san cristoforo * 9,39 0 11,2415 46,0385 it3120043 pize' * 16 0 11,2571 46,0332 it3120045 lagabrun * 4,65 0 11,19833 46,20472 it3120046 prati di monte * 5,99 0 11,243 46,2235 it3120047 paluda la lot * 6,62 0 11,2799 46,2451 it3120048 laghetto di vedes * 8,26 0 11,26833 46,2375 it3120049 lona lases * 26 0 11,22845 46,14315 it3120050 torbiera delle viote * 24 0 11,04278 46,01861 it3120051 stagni della vela soprasasso * 87 0 11,09033 46,09142 it3120052 doss trento * 16 0 11,11194 46,07361 it3120053 foci dell'avisio * 135 0 11,0871 46,1266 it3120054 la rupe * 45 0 11,09778 46,18583 it3120055 lago di toblino * 170 0 10,96806 46,05556 it3120056 palu' longia * 10 0 11,085 46,47333 it3120057 palu' tremole * 4 0 11,07556 46,47944 it3120058 torbiere di monte sous * 99 0 11,05807 46,49556 it3120059 palu' di tuenno * 5,56 0 11,03 46,34194 it3120060 forra di s. giustina * 24 0 11,05828 46,33788 it3120061 la rocchetta * 89 0 11,06028 46,24833 it3120064 torbiera del tonale * 62 0 10,59861 46,25944 it3120065 lago d'idro * 14 0 10,535 45,80778 it3120066 palu' di boniprati 11 0 10,60361 45,93306 it3120068 fiave' * 137 0 10,83139 45,99639 it3120069 torbiera lomasona * 26 0 10,86472 45,98361 it3120074 marocche di dro 251 0 10,93722 45,98611 it3120075 monte brione * 66 0 10,87611 45,88639 it3120076 lago d'ampola * 24 0 10,65389 45,87111 it3120077 palu' di borghetto * 7,93 0 10,925 45,69222 it3120078 torbiera echen 8,33 0 11,195 45,91361 it3120079 lago di loppio * 113 0 10,91722 45,86639 it3120080 laghetti di marco * 35 0 11,01528 45,85806 it3120081 pra dall'albi cei * 117 0 11,03028 45,95389 it3120082 taio di nomi * 5,29 0 11,07988 45,925 it3120084 roncon * 2,9 0 11,63147 46,40169 it3120085 il laghetto * 7,71 0 11,3933 46,0063 it3120086 servis * 313 0 11,06944 45,93722 it3120087 laghi e abisso di lamar 25 0 11,06111 46,12722 it3120088 palu' di monte rovere 16 0 11,2975 45,95889 it3120089 montepiano palu' di fornace * 33 0 11,19611 46,12722 it3120090 monte calvo 1,19 0 11,26243 46,10171 it3120091 albere' di tenna 6,72 0 11,2559 46,0285 it3120092 passo del broccon * 345 0 11,67722 46,12417 it3120093 crinale pichea rocchetta * 1009 0 10,76917 45,91556 it3120094 alpe di storo e bondone * 759 0 10,60583 45,81444 it3120095 bocca d'ardole corno della paura * 178 0 10,94056 45,76611 it3120096 bocca di caset * 50 0 10,69 45,85694 it3120097 catena di lagorai * 2855 0 11,55 46,21917 it3120101 condino 70 0 10,6025 45,8975 it3120102 lago di santa colomba * 5,74 0 11,1825 46,12583 it3120104 monte baldo cima valdritta * 456 0 10,86139 45,7425 it3120105 burrone di ravina * 533 0 11,08222 46,035 it3120106 nodo del latemar * 1862 0 11,59611 46,37278 it3120107 val cadino * 1110 0 11,4075 46,21861 it3120108 val san nicol * 715 0 11,78833 46,42056 it3120109 valle flanginech 81 0 10,79417 46,15139 it3120110 terlago * 109 0 11,05694 46,09917 it3120111 manzano * 99 0 10,95944 45,86972 it3120112 arnago * 157 0 10,91472 46,36972 it3120113 molina castello * 54 0 11,43898 46,2789 it3120114 monte zugna * 1693 0 11,03778 45,84778 it3120115 monte brento 254 0 10,91167 45,98861 it3120116 monte malachin * 169 0 11,11972 46,27778 it3120117 ontaneta di croviana * 28 0 10,90056 46,33694 it3120118 lago (val di fiemme) * 12 0 11,53118 46,28245 it3120119 val duron * 811 0 11,66917 46,4925 it3120120 bassa valle del chiese * 27 0 10,55278 45,82528 it3120121 carbonare * 12 0 11,2236 45,9383 it3120122 gocciadoro * 27 0 11,1421 46,0577 it3120123 assizzi vignola * 91 0 11,26833 46,04833 it3120124 torcegno * 47 0 11,44778 46,0675 it3120125 zaccon * 371 0 11,4225 46,035 it3120126 val noana * 730 0 11,85028 46,11833 it3120127 monti tremalzo e tombea * 5529 0 10,64556 45,84833 it3120128 alta val stava * 1775 0 11,54333 46,31611 it3120129 ghiacciaio marmolada 463 0 11,8625 46,44278 it3120130 il colo 0,29 1 11,6147 46,0871 it3120131 grotta uvada 1,16 1 11,6612 46,1064 it3120132 grotta di ernesto 1,06 1 11,65669 45,9794 it3120134 grotta del calgeron 0,92 5 11,61824 46,009 it3120135 grotta della bigonda 1,23 22 11,5826 46,0176 it3120136 bus della spia 0,66 1 11,027 46,22685 it3120137 bus del diaol 1,04 1 10,90885 45,93823 it3120138 grotta cesare battisti 0,45 2 11,04794 46,14669 it3120139 grotta di costalta 0,54 1 11,3748 45,9877 it3120141 grotta della lovara 0,95 1 11,06326 46,21918 it3120142 val campelle * 1136 0 11,5025 46,12417 it3120143 valle del vanoi * 3247 0 11,64667 46,19722 it3120144 valle del verdes * 2185 0 11,16278 46,34194 it3120146 laghetto delle regole * 21 0 11,10972 46,47639 it3120147 monti lessini ovest * 1025 0 10,94194 45,69944 it3120149 monte ghello * 148 0 11,06139 45,90139 it3120150 talpina brentonico * 241 0 10,9884 45,8267 it3120152 tione villa rendena * 185 0 10,71333 46,04528 it3120154 le sole * 10 0 10,68917 46,02389 it3120156 adige * 14 0 11,008 45,8689 it3120165 vermiglio folgarida * 8723 0 10,6975 46,25861 it3120166 re' di castello breguzzo * 3629 0 10,6117 46,0164 it3120167 torbiere alta val rendena * 771 0 10,83361 46,25083 it3120168 lagorai orientale cima bocche * 12280 0 11,74389 46,27 it3120169 torbiere del lavaze' * 19 0 11,48639 46,35667 it3120170 monte barco le grave * 201 0 11,16889 46,13083 it3120171 muga bianca pasubio * 1947 0 11,1725 45,81639 it3120172 monti lessini piccole dolomiti * 4336 0 11,0792 45,7105 it3120173 monte baldo di brentonico * 2120 0 10,9025 45,81667 it3120174 monte rema' clevet * 491 0 10,52583 45,935 it3120175 adamello * 29929 0 10,65194 46,155 it3120176 monte sadron * 2181 0 10,905 46,30333 it3120177 dolomiti di brenta * 31132 0 10,91 46,19417 it3120178 pale di san martino * 7333 0 11,84472 46,26083 it3120179 val jumela * 36 0 11,7488 46,442 it3210002 monti lessini: cascate di molina 233 14 10,91639 45,6 it3210004 monte luppia e p.ta san vigilio * 1037 29 10,7308 45,6495 it3210006 monti lessini: ponte di veja, vaio della marciora 171 12 10,96722 45,61944 it3210007 monte baldo: val dei mulini, senge di marciaga, rocca di garda * 676 21 10,72179 45,5694 it3210021 monte pastello * 1750 24 10,85444 45,57111 it3210039 monte baldo ovest * 6510 67 10,83222 45,73583 it3210040 monti lessini pasubio piccole dolomiti vicentine * 13872 179 11,20056 45,74389 it3210041 monte baldo est * 2762 57 10,86722 45,65333 it3210043 fiume adige tra belluno veronese e verona ovest * 476 95 10,87582 45,47345 it3220002 granezza 1303 17 11,54472 45,82861 it3220007 fiume brenta dal confine trentino a cismon del grappa * 1680 64 11,655 45,8775 it3220036 altopiano dei sette comuni * 14988 87 11,48139 45,95667 it3230003 gruppo del sella * 449 11 11,83639 46,505 it3230005 gruppo marmolada * 1305 20 11,8725 46,42667 it3230006 val visdende monte peralba quaterna' * 14165 73 12,59528 46,63139 it3230017 monte pelmo mondeval formin * 11065 89 12,125 46,45611 it3230019 lago di misurina 75 5 12,25972 46,58333 it3230022 massiccio del grappa * 22473 142 11,80889 45,89833 it3230025 gruppo del visentin: m. faverghera m. cor * 1562 24 12,30278 46,06528 it3230026 passo di san boldo * 38 3 12,17389 46,00389 it3230027 monte dolada versante s.e. * 659 13 12,33972 46,19639 it3230031 val tovanella bosconero * 8845 53 12,28333 46,33972 it3230035 valli del cismon vanoi: monte coppolo * 2845 29 11,72667 46,07861 it3230042 torbiera di lipoi * 65 5 11,95667 46,03861 it3230043 pale di san martino: focobon, pape san lucano, agner croda granda * 10909 66 11,90611 46,30417 it3230044 fontane di nogare' * 212 9 12,24222 46,15111 it3230045 torbiera di antole 25 3 12,1753 46,13758 it3230047 lago di santa croce 788 14 12,33806 46,11361 it3230060 torbiere di danta * 205 11 12,49917 46,56333 it3230063 torbiere di lac torond * 38 3 11,99139 46,23806 it3230067 aree palustri di melere monte gal e boschi di col d'ongia * 111 8 12,21528 46,04694 it3230068 valpiana valmorel (aree palustri) 126 6 12,22722 46,07444 it3230071 dolomiti di ampezzo * 11362 77 12,10556 46,59528 it3230077 foresta del cansiglio * 5060 44 12,41028 46,08194 it3230078 gruppo del popera dolomiti di auronzo e di val comelico * 8924 73 12,38639 46,6025 it3230080 val talagona gruppo monte cridola monte duranno * 12252 68 12,41806 46,39333 it3230081 gruppo antelao marmarole sorapis * 17069 74 12,28944 46,50222 it3230083 dolomiti feltrine e bellunesi * 31383 178 12,05083 46,18611 it3230084 civetta cime di san sebastiano * 6597 68 12,07972 46,34972 it3230085 comelico bosco della digola brentoni tudaio * 12085 89 12,58722 46,51694 it3230088 fiume piave dai maserot alle grave di pederobba * 3236 121 12,07072 46,0791 it3230090 cima campo monte celado * 1812 24 11,70806 45,99944 it3240003 monte cesen * 3697 32 12,01167 45,95389 it3310001 dolomiti friulane * 36740 0 12,5411 46,3239 it3310002 val colvera di jof * 396 0 12,6783 46,2006 it3310003 monte ciaurlec e forra del torrente cosa * 875 0 12,8703 46,2339 it3310004 forra del torrente cellina * 289 0 12,6075 46,1839 it3310006 foresta del cansiglio * 2713 0 12,4436 46,0611 it3320001 gruppo del monte coglians * 5405 0 12,81 46,6203 it3320002 monti dimon e paularo * 702 0 13,0733 46,5642 it3320003 creta di aip e sella di lanza * 3894 0 13,1767 46,5611 it3320004 monte auernig e monte corona * 465 0 13,3344 46,5561 it3320005 valloni di rio bianco e di malborghetto * 4662 0 13,4122 46,5397 it3320006 conca di fusine * 3598 0 13,6589 46,4689 it3320007 monti bivera e clapsavon * 1832 0 12,6322 46,4472 it3320008 col gentile * 1038 0 12,8072 46,4597 it3320009 zuc dal bor * 1415 0 13,2389 46,4611 it3320010 jof di montasio e jof fuart * 7999 0 13,4881 46,4331 it3320011 monti verzegnis e valcalda * 2406 0 12,8644 46,3572 it3320012 prealpi giulie settentrionali * 9592 0 13,2203 46,3519 it3320013 lago minisini e rivoli bianchi * 402 0 13,1375 46,3083 it3320014 torrente lerada * 365 0 13,3933 46,2114 it3320015 valle del medio tagliamento * 3580 0 13,0419 46,2372 it3320016 forra del cornappo * 299 0 13,2969 46,2425 it3320017 rio bianco di taipana e gran monte * 1721 0 13,3489 46,2797 it3320018 forra del pradolino e monte mia * 1010 0 13,4661 46,2097 it3320019 monte matajur * 213 0 13,5625 46,1906 it3320040 rii del gambero di torrente * 28 0 13,6208 46,5246 it6020002 lago secco e agro nero * 135 0 13,32139 42,70667 it6020025 monti della laga (area sommitale) * 2424 0 13,37861 42,64389 it6050017 pendici di colle nero * 132 0 13,85083 41,72611 it6050018 cime del massiccio della meta * 2541 0 13,96194 41,65167 it6050020 val canneto * 990 0 13,90972 41,68861 it7110099 gole del sagittario * 1349 0 13,81417 41,96472 it7110100 monte genzana * 5805 0 13,91472 41,95639 it7110101 lago di scanno ed emissari 103 0 13,86472 41,92194 it7110202 gran sasso * 33995 0 13,61972 42,43528 it7110204 maiella sud ovest * 6276 0 14,01639 41,95472 it7110205 parco nazionale d'abruzzo * 58880 0 13,68722 41,85028 it7120201 monti della laga e lago di campotosto * 15816 0 13,42889 42,66861 it7140043 monti pizi monte secine * 4195 0 14,16944 41,91167 it7140203 maiella * 36119 0 14,11389 42,08167 plc120001 tatry * 21 017,8 19,948 49,2573 plc120002 pieniny * 2 336,43 20,3786 49,4176 plc180001 bieszczady * 111 519,4 22,4258 49,1883 plh120001 ostoja babiog rska * 3 350,43 19,5297 49,5877 plh120002 czarna orawa * 183,99 20 19,7158 49,5062 plh120012 na policy * 765,75 19,6188 49,6306 plh120016 torfowiska orawsko-nowotarskie * 8 255,62 19,7661 49,4358 plh120018 ostoja gorcza ska * 17 997,89 20,1444 49,5686 plh120019 ostoja popradzka * 57 930,98 20,8357 49,4172 plh120024 dolina bia ki * 716,03 20,1092 49,391 plh120025 ma e pieniny * 1 875,94 20,5538 49,3966 plh120026 polana bia y potok * 53,42 19,8484 49,2827 plh120033 bednarka * 1 291,93 21,3348 49,6495 plh120035 nawojowa * 1 993,97 20,7646 49,5633 plh120036 abowa * 3 251,19 20,8599 49,543 plh120037 podkowce w szczawnicy 569,15 20,4733 49,4236 plh120039 krynica 163,8 20,9524 49,3958 plh120043 lubo wielki 33,63 19,9948 49,6502 plh120045 niedzica 25,75 1 20,319 49,4204 plh120046 ko ci w wgl wce 88,56 20,0746 49,7486 plh120050 ochotnica 0,16 20,3324 49,5255 plh120052 ostoje nietoperzy beskidu wyspowego * 5 706,13 20,4772 49,7326 plh120057 r dliska wis oki 181,84 21,3723 49,4538 plh120078 uroczysko opie * 44,63 20,2774 49,6988 plh120081 lubogoszcz * 16,73 20,1029 49,7142 plh120082 ki ko o kasiny wielkiej 24,36 20,1384 49,7017 plh120086 g rny dunajec * 150,24 20,0734 49,4859 plh120087 ososina * 345,39 20,643 49,7568 plh120088 rodkowy dunajec z dop ywami * 755,83 20,4463 49,4251 plh120090 bia a tarnowska * 957,46 20,9585 49,9659 plh120093 raba z mszank 249,27 19,9796 49,7356 plh120094 ostoje nietoperzy powiatu gorlickiego * 2 824,56 21,0923 49,6106 plh120095 tylmanowa 0,26 20,4025 49,5003 plh120096 bia owodzka g ra nad dunajcem 67,65 20,633 49,6897 plh180001 ostoja magurska * 20 104,73 21,5073 49,5284 plh180011 jasio ka * 686,73 21,6963 49,5857 plh180012 ostoja przemyska * 39 656,77 22,6273 49,6919 plh180013 ostoja g ry s onne * 46 071,46 22,3521 49,5339 plh180014 ostoja ja liska * 29 252,1 21,8478 49,3976 plh180015 ysa g ra * 2 743,79 21,5896 49,5444 plh180016 ryman w * 5 240,99 21,8679 49,5295 plh180018 trzciana * 2 285,53 21,6685 49,5089 plh180021 dorzecze g rnego sanu * 1 578,67 22,1565 49,4448 plh180026 moczary * 1 181,79 7 22,7164 49,3669 plh180037 ko ci w skalniku 350,62 21,4848 49,5714 plh180044 osuwiska w lipowicy 13,51 21,6893 49,5335 plh180052 wis oka z dop ywami * 2 651,03 21,4006 49,7269 plh240005 beskid l ski * 26 405,25 19,025 49,6323 plh240006 beskid ywiecki * 35 276,05 19,1876 49,5279 plh240007 ko ci w radziechowach 0,06 19,1281 49,647 plh240023 beskid ma y * 7 186,16 19,4004 49,764 rosci0001 aniniurile de pe t rlung * 163,1 25,82338 45,54233 rosci0002 apuseni * 75 876,5 22,80174 46,58312 rosci0003 arboretele de castan comestibil de la baia mare 2 092,6 23,55769 47,68723 rosci0007 bazinul ciucului de jos * 2 758,8 25,87122 46,23923 rosci0009 bisoca * 1 215,6 26,67078 45,53909 rosci0010 bistri a aurie * 346,9 25,24778 47,50268 rosci0013 bucegi * 38 683,6 25,46586 45,38008 rosci0015 buila v nturari a * 4 478,7 24,09139 45,2395 rosci0016 buteasa 372,6 22,71104 46,69674 rosci0018 c ld rile z balei * 388,5 26,57649 45,66158 rosci0019 c limani gurghiu * 135257 25,12134 46,91451 rosci0023 cascada miina * 220,1 26,57204 45,75638 rosci0024 ceahl u * 7763 25,93908 46,95625 rosci0027 cheile bicazului h ma * 7 633,1 25,81118 46,74829 rosci0028 cheile cernei 512,9 22,66066 45,65455 rosci0033 cheile ug ului munticelu * 324,9 25,84086 46,83818 rosci0035 cheile turzii * 326,4 23,67793 46,56237 rosci0036 cheile v rghiului * 866,5 25,54034 46,21297 rosci0037 ciomad balvanyos * 5 976,6 25,95604 46,09963 rosci0038 ciuca * 21 968,8 25,95354 45,50796 rosci0046 cozia * 16 725,2 24,3048 45,31704 rosci0047 creasta nemirei * 3591 26,33208 46,23369 rosci0051 cuma * 44 084,2 24,83628 47,15391 rosci0052 d ncioanea * 356,3 22,63698 45,44779 rosci0054 dealul cet ii deva * 113,3 22,87594 45,8892 rosci0062 defileul criului repede p durea craiului * 40 270,2 22,44203 46,8857 rosci0063 defileul jiului * 10 927,1 23,37391 45,27322 rosci0069 domogled valea cernei * 62 121,3 22,62396 45,09182 rosci0084 ferice plai 1 993,1 22,54438 46,6885 rosci0085 frumoasa * 137 256,1 23,81905 45,57925 rosci0086 g ina lucina * 842,5 25,17694 47,65602 rosci0087 gr ditea muncelului cioclovina * 39 855,2 23,23729 45,57348 rosci0089 gut i creasta cocoului * 688 23,84974 47,69855 rosci0090 harghita m d ra * 13 321,9 25,57142 46,48106 rosci0091 herculian * 12917 25,70516 46,20488 rosci0092 igni * 19 635,3 23,7612 47,84753 rosci0096 lacul b lb itoarea * 3 26,10513 45,38911 rosci0097 lacul negru * 104,2 26,48281 45,84546 rosci0101 larion * 3 058,8 25,05169 47,3498 rosci0102 leaota * 1 378,4 25,3266 45,3911 rosci0103 lunca buz ului * 9 575,4 27,00109 45,07591 rosci0113 mlatina dup lunc * 428,5 25,60505 46,63171 rosci0116 molhaurile c p nei * 807,9 23,10976 46,48128 rosci0119 muntele mare * 1 643,8 23,23166 46,48416 rosci0120 muntele t mpa * 206,5 25,59603 45,63449 rosci0121 muntele vulcan 104,6 22,96236 46,23901 rosci0122 mun ii f g ra * 198 620,5 24,74101 45,54575 rosci0124 mun ii maramureului * 106 867,9 24,60273 47,79353 rosci0125 mun ii rodnei * 47939 24,73817 47,54064 rosci0126 mun ii arcu * 58 606,1 22,50581 45,30754 rosci0127 muntioru ursoaia * 155,9 26,66666 45,59879 rosci0128 nordul gorjului de est * 49201 23,64074 45,24574 rosci0129 nordul gorjului de vest * 86 980,5 23,04347 45,16876 rosci0130 oituz ojdula * 15 343,7 26,36588 46,01241 rosci0132 oltul mijlociu cibin h rtibaciu 2 910,5 24,31627 45,67236 rosci0137 p durea bog ii * 6340 25,41291 45,90758 rosci0153 p durea glodeasa * 535,1 25,73104 45,40165 rosci0156 mun ii goman * 17152 26,30237 46,85308 rosci0182 p durea verdele * 282,3 26,58405 45,79779 rosci0188 par ng * 30290 23,58596 45,35459 rosci0189 p r ul barlangos 66,4 25,67381 46,68284 rosci0190 penteleu * 11 275,7 26,391 45,6209 rosci0193 petera t uoare 131,3 24,52872 47,44296 rosci0194 piatra craiului * 15 904,8 25,22463 45,48401 rosci0195 piatra mare * 4 281,4 25,63861 45,55564 rosci0196 pietrosul brotenilor cheile zugrenilor * 456 25,53131 47,39453 rosci0204 poiana muntioru * 24,1 26,69439 45,65436 rosci0207 post varul * 1 288,2 25,5785 45,56545 rosci0208 putna vrancea * 38 060,2 26,50348 45,92128 rosci0212 rar u giumal u * 2 526,8 25,60252 47,44753 rosci0217 retezat * 43 528,5 22,80489 45,33029 rosci0219 rusca montan * 12 771,8 22,40694 45,60815 rosci0228 indrili a * 870,3 26,54388 45,72122 rosci0229 siriu * 6 242,2 26,15516 45,51909 rosci0230 sl nic 1 393,4 26,40874 46,21466 rosci0233 someul rece * 8 499,6 23,11029 46,55487 rosci0236 strei ha eg * 24 977,5 23,05305 45,43789 rosci0239 t rnovu mare latori a * 1 361,8 23,88738 45,36735 rosci0241 tinovul apa lina honcsok * 7 830,1 26,19078 46,1944 rosci0242 tinovul apa roie * 66,8 26,25114 46,17431 rosci0243 tinovul de la dealul albinelor * 29,6 25,31074 46,75858 rosci0244 tinovul de la f nt na brazilor * 41,5 25,25569 46,50721 rosci0245 tinovul de la rom neti * 21 25,16715 47,37561 rosci0246 tinovul luci * 274,4 25,71854 46,2999 rosci0247 tinovul mare poiana stampei * 695,9 25,09189 47,28869 rosci0248 tinovul moho lacul sf. ana * 434,4 25,89589 46,13084 rosci0249 tinovul aru dornei * 41,8 25,35552 47,25699 rosci0250 inutul p durenilor * 7064 22,50776 45,71415 rosci0251 tisa superioar * 6283 23,68171 47,98353 rosci0252 topli a scaunul rotund borsec * 5 617,2 25,47494 46,96418 rosci0253 trasc u * 49 963,5 23,33369 46,17378 rosci0256 turb ria ruginosu zagon * 346,6 26,22768 45,76712 rosci0258 v ile br tiei i br tioarei * 219,7 24,93411 45,26322 rosci0260 valea cepelor * 781,9 22,71534 46,44439 rosci0262 valea iadei * 2 977,9 22,57973 46,73226 rosci0263 valea ierii * 6 289,9 23,30292 46,59274 rosci0264 valea izei i dealul solovan * 46 937,9 24,22179 47,65949 rosci0270 v n tori-neam * 30 196,6 26,20044 47,1742 rosci0279 borzont 271,9 25,39147 46,68923 rosci0280 buz ul superior * 199,1 26,09606 45,63791 rosci0283 cheile doftanei * 2 622,9 25,74551 45,25108 rosci0285 codrii seculari de la str mbu b iu * 2 962,4 24,0502 47,63208 rosci0291 coridorul mun ii bihorului codru moma * 7 596,4 22,4969 46,37726 rosci0292 coridorul rusca montan arcu retezat * 24 431,3 22,59485 45,57699 rosci0297 dealurile t rnavei mici biche * 37 353,2 24,95098 46,47204 rosci0304 h rtibaciu sud vest * 22 840,8 24,40773 45,783 rosci0318 m gura t rgu ocna * 847,9 26,57169 46,26795 rosci0321 moldova superioar * 409,5 25,36269 47,54015 rosci0323 mun ii ciucului * 60045 25,94878 46,50364 rosci0324 mun ii bihor * 20 932,2 22,65693 46,40346 rosci0327 nemira lapo * 9 980,2 26,22625 46,30859 rosci0328 obcinele bucovinei * 32 209,1 25,45082 47,70091 rosci0329 oltul superior 1 537,6 25,47421 45,76095 rosci0339 p durea povernii valea cerni a * 895,1 22,99426 46,22518 rosci0352 perani * 2 253,1 25,28351 45,7536 rosci0355 podiul lipovei poiana rusc * 35 974,8 22,39369 45,82406 rosci0358 pricop huta certeze * 3 168,8 23,51377 47,95755 rosci0365 r ul moldova ntre p ltinoasa i rui 5 329,7 26,18109 47,41928 rosci0374 r ul negru 2 314,5 26,12249 45,9287 rosci0381 r ul t rgului argeel r uor * 13 175,9 25,06558 45,43291 rosci0385 r ul timi ntre rusca i prisaca 1 400,4 22,19374 45,47299 rosci0395 soveja * 4572 26,61395 46,009 rosci0411 groii ibleului 927,5 24,20363 47,54121 rosci0439 valea chiuru ilor 1 245,2 25,58362 46,76046 se0620001 l ngfj llet-st djan-nipfj llet * 93 785,9 0 12,6179 62,0925 se0620002 vedungsfj llen * 19 385,7 0 13,2513 61,9306 se0620003 fj t lven och v stvallen i storfj ten 299 0 13,1284 61,8901 se0620005 stor n- sterdal lven 819 0 12,7788 61,8868 se0620009 drevfj llen * 33 158,3 0 12,339 61,7066 se0620015 fulufj llet * 40 737,2 0 12,7276 61,5509 se0620024 skars sfj llet * 2 292,9 0 12,8918 61,3439 se0620220 storbron * 248,9 0 12,8527 61,3904 se0620266 lillfj ten * 423 0 12,9545 62,0003 se0720029 sonfj llet * 11 285,5 0 13,5477 62,2794 se0720033 rogen * 49 025,5 0 12,4346 62,3402 se0720084 v l dalen * 121 378,5 0 12,8259 63,1095 se0720160 oldfl n-ans tten * 28 063,1 0 13,7889 63,8561 se0720164 sk ckerfj llen * 46 235,1 0 12,6865 63,8329 se0720171 svensk dalen * 24 645,8 0 13,1586 64,0159 se0720182 saxvattnet * 5 372,4 0 15,1895 64,6448 se0720183 frostvikenfj llen * 93 793,2 0 14,7125 64,6478 se0720185 bjur lven-korallgrottan * 5 638,4 0 14,1189 64,913 se0720186 grubbdalen * 2 598,6 0 13,7626 64,0297 se0720199 gr berget-hotagsfj llen * 118 040,2 0 14,563 64,1415 se0720200 henv len-aloppan * 17 568,5 0 13,3834 62,6981 se0720203 h llings fallet * 16,2 0 14,3909 64,3507 se0720206 t nnforsen * 9,3 0 12,7384 63,4447 se0720209 j rvdalen * 2 023,4 0 13,6245 63,1492 se0720212 bastudalen * 2 824,7 0 13,8566 63,0803 se0720213 marntalls sen * 4 058,4 0 13,9802 62,9309 se0720214 ar dalen * 1 127,2 0 13,6578 62,8992 se0720218 brovallv len * 5190 0 13,2596 62,328 se0720220 stor sen * 1 053,5 0 13,3742 62,3381 se0720223 hamrafj llet * 672,9 0 12,282 62,5661 se0720250 skrapavattnet 29,8 0 14,424 63,86 se0720259 trapp sen 206,6 0 12,4385 62,67 se0720260 kilbergsdalen 2,2 0 13,9661 62,3952 se0720262 svallmyren * 213,7 0 12,538 62,5903 se0720263 lill-r nddalen * 52,4 0 13,3051 62,2545 se0720264 lerdals lven-tv rlid n * 70,4 0 13,9395 64,7314 se0720265 vall n frostviken * 186,7 0 13,9973 64,7539 se0720268 s lg sen * 10,9 0 14,3537 64,4628 se0720269 s rh llan * 3,9 0 13,3167 62,2422 se0720273 b gavattnet * 26,1 0 14,2958 64,0897 se0720274 sand svallen 16,7 0 12,3652 62,5395 se0720276 lill svallen ramundberget 10,1 0 12,4079 62,6808 se0720277 klinken * 469 0 12,2855 62,7291 se0720279 styggdalen-varg n * 327,4 0 12,2626 63,6359 se0720280 rosselberget * 43,3 0 12,6982 62,4802 se0720281 stor-mitt kl ppen * 1092 0 12,4621 62,7269 se0720282 nnsj n * 8 950,7 0 12,5391 63,2737 se0720283 gr ndalen frostviken 28,8 0 14,07 64,781 se0720284 jorm n 198,6 0 14,0054 64,7107 se0720285 ljungan; uppstr ms storsj n 165 0 12,8405 62,8569 se0720286 re lven 6483 0 12,6256 63,4533 se0720287 stor n (ammer n alpin) 81,6 0 14,8835 63,9312 se0720288 damm n-stor n 200,5 0 13,8513 63,1055 se0720289 toskstr mmen (h rkan alpin) 4 013,5 0 14,193 64,0138 se0720291 ljusnan (hede-svegsj n) 1 937,3 0 13,7823 62,3068 se0720292 k l n ( sterdal lven) 255,8 0 12,9476 62,16 se0720296 stikkenjukke (sax n) 77,1 0 14,3726 65,0848 se0720300 fiskhusberget * 725,8 0 13,5945 63,2653 se0720305 kullflon-nyflon * 3 639,7 0 14,9266 63,9764 se0720355 flon, bruksvallarna * 39,5 0 12,4878 62,6131 se0720356 j ns-ersk len 2,4 0 14,1168 62,4403 se0720359 ammer n 4 093,3 0 15,4547 63,5191 se0720361 h rkan 5 741,3 0 14,6322 63,7258 se0720369 s lvbacka str mmar 43,9 0 13,304 62,7916 se0720371 h kvatts n 25,5 0 14,8711 63,8634 se0720401 storsundet laxviken * 17,9 0 14,6769 63,8291 se0720409 l skvatts n 3,3 0 14,7446 63,9463 se0720423 berntbygget 5,6 0 14,41 63,8454 se0720424 skrapavattsb cken * 16,4 0 14,4365 63,8681 se0720428 h jden boteln set * 209 0 14,344 63,9132 se0720442 myhrbodarna 4,1 0 14,2347 64,0888 se0720447 holmvallen 4,5 0 12,5153 62,7181 se0720448 brynndammen * 12,2 0 13,7795 62,5244 se0720449 v ster-dalsvallen 2,4 0 12,4218 63,2162 se0720452 t nger sen; backen 4,4 0 13,8076 63,5704 se0720453 t nger sen; vallarna 3,6 0 13,8116 63,5563 se0720456 oppidala ramundberget 1,2 0 12,3376 62,7196 se0720464 ramundberget sydost 1 2,4 0 12,4033 62,6929 se0720465 ramundberget sydost 3 3,2 0 12,4 62,6992 se0810054 blaikfj llet * 34174 0 16,1144 64,6027 se0810057 gitsfj llet * 40 132,7 0 15,5132 64,8363 se0810058 ryptj rnberget * 73,6 0 15,8079 64,8392 se0810059 marsfj llet * 86 113,9 0 15,5647 65,1213 se0810060 skalmodal * 312,9 0 14,5497 65,4342 se0810080 vindelfj llen * 554 674,6 0 15,9676 65,9087 se0810347 r dingsj * 6 384,3 0 15,1501 64,7906 se0810350 kalvtj rnarna * 864,1 0 15,3083 64,715 se0810355 brattiken * 780,3 0 15,9212 65,4227 se0810367 guorte, joesj 479,6 0 14,5552 65,6621 se0810374 dikasj n * 4,8 0 15,9107 65,2262 se0810377 vilan set, strimasund 13,4 0 14,9012 66,0444 se0810385 r vattsliden 33,5 0 15,097 65,7115 se0810386 guortab cken 4 0 15,106 65,3381 se0810394 vardo-, laster- och fj llfj llen * 106338 0 14,6871 65,2424 se0810395 virisens vattensystem 3 712,7 0 15,0862 65,4128 se0810396 daune * 12 009,6 0 15,148 65,2734 se0810397 s dra gardfj llet * 37 099,4 0 15,5637 65,3329 se0810398 norra borgafj ll * 13 039,1 0 15,0451 64,8894 se0810399 vojmsj landet * 4 883,2 0 16,319 64,9767 se0810435 vindel lven 58 496,7 0 18,397 65,0467 se0810439 satsfj llet * 11 845,6 0 15,1484 64,9686 se0810443 ammarn sdeltat 272,5 0 16,2292 65,9612 se0810482 vargtj rn 0,93 0 15,9738 65,4823 se0810485 rauksvajja 59,8 0 15,7501 65,6479 se0810488 skansn s n 287 0 16,0525 65,2619 se0810513 njakafj ll * 6 193,4 0 15,6662 64,9632 se0820056 laisdalens fj llurskog * 72 629,2 0 16,9531 66,0986 se0820057 m rkberget * 290,9 0 16,866 66,2331 se0820061 veddek * 6 086,3 0 17,3117 65,9697 se0820120 pieljekaise * 15 484,7 0 16,7683 66,3543 se0820123 hornavan-s dvajaure fj llurskog * 80 410,4 0 17,255 66,4221 se0820124 tjeggelvas * 32 810,2 0 17,7822 66,5424 se0820125 ramanj * 4642 0 17,5793 66,6507 se0820130 udtja * 146 491,7 0 19,1045 66,3632 se0820137 s kevaratj * 7 200,4 0 19,4412 66,4856 se0820154 kallovaratjeh * 2 223,3 0 16,777 67,1181 se0820156 p rl lvens fj llurskog * 115 725,8 0 18,2002 66,7584 se0820163 kvikkjokk-kabla fj llurskog * 49 111,8 0 18,007 67,0023 se0820167 muddus * 50 223,6 0 20,1975 66,9139 se0820185 sarek * 198 465,6 0 17,6691 67,2883 se0820186 ultevis fj llurskog * 117 203,3 0 18,9818 67,0774 se0820193 stubba * 33 286,3 0 20,0292 67,098 se0820201 padjelanta * 199 897,6 0 16,7219 67,41 se0820202 stora sj fallet * 127 993,3 0 17,9937 67,5669 se0820204 kaitum fj llurskog * 89 954,9 0 20,3061 67,6223 se0820209 lina fj llurskog * 98 049,7 0 20,4573 67,3621 se0820216 sjaunja * 281 371,3 0 19,2393 67,4494 se0820234 stordalen * 1135 0 19,0314 68,3573 se0820243 rautas * 81 694,2 0 19,9368 68,0166 se0820244 sautusvaara * 1 832,7 0 20,8338 67,888 se0820261 abisko * 7 720,5 0 18,6807 68,3243 se0820275 alajaure * 17 076,7 0 20,2046 68,1276 se0820282 tornetr sk-soppero fj llurskog * 336 897,8 0 21,0498 68,1398 se0820284 vadvetj kka * 2 703,9 0 18,4327 68,5413 se0820287 pessinki fj llurskog * 97 225,3 0 22,7007 68,0108 se0820293 norra tornetr sk * 45 888,4 0 19,1455 68,4315 se0820294 yraft * 724,4 0 16,5805 66,289 se0820295 laidauredeltat * 1 917,7 0 18,2126 67,1508 se0820334 sulitelma 61 866,4 0 16,3581 66,9996 se0820402 aktse 2,1 0 18,3034 67,1473 se0820430 torne och kalix lvsystem 176 092,3 0 20,9884 67,7214 se0820431 r ne lven 15 633,6 0 21,5402 66,2782 se0820434 pite lven 52486 0 18,9306 66,1821 se0820472 ratejokk 3,6 0 19,5599 67,8144 se0820619 tavvavuoma * 53 941,3 0 20,6633 68,4916 se0820620 p ltsa * 24 957,3 0 20,4435 69,0056 se0820621 l ktatj kka 7 577,7 0 18,4263 68,3891 se0820623 nissuntj rro 25 767,3 0 18,845 68,246 se0820722 jelka-rimak bb * 37 671,7 0 19,5851 66,8931 se0820737 lais lven 11 063,9 0 16,7981 66,1347 si3000001 cvelbar skalovje 4,569 14,8302 46,4628 si3000002 obistove skale 13,023 14,8382 46,4714 si3000005 mate a voda in bistrica * 197,833 14,5767 45,762 si3000006 je evec * 217,726 14,5767 45,762 si3000012 krem arjev potok * 3,341 15,1185 46,5131 si3000013 vrzdenec * 131,53 14,2644 46,0241 si3000015 medvedje brdo * 189,065 14,1387 45,9666 si3000016 zaplana * 218,062 14,2329 45,9702 si3000017 ligojna * 138,25 14,261 49,3208 si3000019 nem ki rovt 126,311 13,9798 46,2731 si3000020 cerkno zakri * 529,672 13,9679 46,1374 si3000021 podreber dvor 279,438 14,3269 46,0655 si3000023 otale lazec * 493,8 13,9839 46,0841 si3000024 av e 25,078 13,6913 46,1006 si3000026 ribni ka dolina * 485,439 14,7367 45,7129 si3000027 lipov ek 5,099 13,8014 46,208 si3000030 erjav dolina smrti 79,934 14,8679 46,4768 si3000031 pod bu nico meli a * 4,823 13,7474 46,1691 si3000032 pri modreju meli a * 11,651 13,7548 46,1549 si3000033 pod mijo meli a * 37,219 13,4959 46,2345 si3000034 banj ice travi a * 1 166,116 13,7004 46,0451 si3000038 smrekov ko pogorje * 84,266 14,8575 46,4189 si3000042 jezerc pri logatcu 0,335 14,2197 45,948 si3000043 stahovica meli a * 7,021 14,6051 46,2734 si3000045 bohinjska bela skalovje 3,307 14,0627 46,3493 si3000070 pikrnica sel nica * 36,361 15,0177 46,5174 si3000077 kendove robe 69,799 14,0099 46,05 si3000078 jelenk 64,15 13,9893 46,0522 si3000081 jama v globinah 10,163 14,0556 46,0372 si3000082 ukovnik 47,355 14,0282 46,0529 si3000084 jama pod le etnico 49,927 14,0612 45,9909 si3000087 zelenci 54,157 13,7485 46,4924 si3000090 pesjakov buden 63,281 14,0514 46,3673 si3000095 tinetova jama 7,21 14,9599 46,2842 si3000098 mesarska lopa 20,976 14,9013 46,3701 si3000102 ledina na jelovici * 23,19 14,1092 46,2611 si3000103 blato na jelovici * 29,287 14,0812 46,2891 si3000107 breznica 52,112 14,155 46,3928 si3000108 raduha * 1 632,786 14,7472 46,4109 si3000110 ratitovec 2 331,3 14,0833 46,2269 si3000119 porezen * 849,373 13,9661 46,1841 si3000124 krasnica * 74,852 13,8126 46,1298 si3000126 nano ica * 771,369 14,1342 45,7858 si3000127 grahovo ob ba i 17,281 13,867 46,1618 si3000128 znojile 10,89 13,9143 46,1989 si3000129 rin a * 239,176 14,8211 45,6696 si3000132 peca * 393,877 14,761 46,501 si3000133 radovna most v sr. radovni jez he vintgar 43,749 14,0424 46,3819 si3000136 votla pe 11,979 14,9724 46,5462 si3000140 bel ki potok * 10,992 14,864 46,5876 si3000151 kozje stene pri slivnici 19,636 14,4203 45,7976 si3000158 babja luknja 28,443 14,3906 46,1338 si3000166 razbor * 1 449,978 15,0242 46,4632 si3000167 nadi a s pritoki 152,686 13,4814 46,25 si3000172 zgornja drava s pritoki * 4 682,751 15,3367 46,5847 si3000173 blo ica * 789,436 14,5319 45,7827 si3000180 rodine 103,922 14,1812 46,3823 si3000182 velka s pritoki * 18,034 15,2817 46,549 si3000189 ejna dolina * 54,782 14,1546 45,9583 si3000196 breginjski stol * 1 600,857 13,4506 46,2738 si3000199 dolenja vas pri ribnici 13,395 14,7677 45,7004 si3000209 jama pod smoganico 41,855 13,7439 46,1353 si3000211 jama na pucovem kuclu * 60,868 14,1287 46,0047 si3000216 barbarski potok s pritoki * 35,317 15,1094 46,5024 si3000224 huda luknja * 3 018,193 15,1932 46,4095 si3000230 idrijca s pritoki * 404,501 13,9623 46,0885 si3000231 javorniki sne nik * 44 038,32 14,3668 45,6419 si3000232 notranjski trikotnik * 15 231,6 14,3227 45,7752 si3000236 kobari ko blato 24,891 13,5705 46,2456 si3000253 julijske alpe * 74 085,58 13,7463 46,3488 si3000254 so a z volarjo * 1 411,814 13,6966 46,1982 si3000255 trnovski gozd nanos * 53 234,95 13,8642 45,9899 si3000256 krimsko hribovje meni ija * 20 334,38 14,4182 45,9061 si3000261 menina * 4 177,514 14,811 46,2551 si3000263 ko evsko * 106 794,2 15,035 45,6178 si3000264 kamni ko savinjske alpe * 14 568,09 14,6053 46,354 si3000270 pohorje * 27 568,11 15,4494 46,4814 si3000271 ljubljansko barje * 12 960,56 14,4452 46,0015 si3000277 podbrdo skalovje 2,417 13,949 46,2017 si3000278 poklju ka barja * 858,908 13,9729 46,3354 si3000281 vrhe povirno barje 6,3 15,0322 46,493 si3000285 karavanke * 23090 14,4001 46,3859 si3000291 ljubljanica grada ica mali graben 186,579 14,5602 46,0509 si3000293 jenina * 9,534 15,1118 46,4547 si3000297 mi ja dolina * 637,258 14,5865 45,8039 si3000299 pajsarjeva jama 23,215 14,2652 45,9998 si3000309 savinja gru ovlje petrov e * 464,175 15,1152 46,2423 si3000310 bezuljak 86,562 14,3762 45,834 si3000311 vitanje oplotnica * 1 304,473 15,2988 46,3908 si3000315 i nica s pritoki * 10,896 15,4029 46,3103 si3000320 tr i ica s pritoki * 15,483 14,689 45,7676 si3000322 sopot s pritoki * 4,802 14,8633 46,3689 si3000323 cerkni ica * 12,803 14,4926 45,8098 si3000324 rni potok * 36,603 14,9932 46,5203 si3000325 potok reka s pritoki * 11,252 14,1826 45,943 si3000327 doma ek * 1,645 13,6403 46,0754 si3000334 berje zasip * 168,377 14,1139 46,393 si3000335 polhograjsko hribovje * 2 965,092 14,2416 46,041 si3000342 cereja * 2,809 14,6313 45,8233 si3000348 bohinjska bistrica in jereka * 727,26 13,9338 46,2743 si3000349 pera ica * 10,904 14,2271 46,3389 si3000350 mavel ica povirni del * 9,768 14,3998 46,0948 si3000351 ro evnica * 1,064 14,2833 46,3505 si3000353 urkov potok * 2,633 14,5832 45,8763 si3000359 lu nica * 8,973 14,7263 46,3334 si3000360 dreta * 14,829 14,7791 46,2829 si3000363 drameljski potok * 3,426 15,3842 46,2889 si3000372 kanomljica s pritoki * 16,183 13,9314 46,0435 si3000373 kovni ca * 2,196 14,3355 46,0325 si3000374 ti nica * 1,658 14,3187 46,0295 si3000381 slatnik 118,572 13,9962 46,2393 si3000383 jamnikova in strev eva pe 88,412 14,6526 46,426 si3000384 huda pe 18,834 14,6806 46,4275 si3000385 robnik 26,757 14,7267 46,4428 skuev0001 tri penia ky * 140,511 0 20,22571 48,61786 skuev0002 l ky pod ukorovou 12,13 0 20,13129 48,6989 skuev0003 rimava 4,066 0 19,94194 48,67222 skuev0005 drie ov * 30,3015 0 21,98813 48,92024 skuev0008 repisk * 61,82 0 19,36333 48,63833 skuev0009 koryto * 25,056 0 19,4575 48,61972 skuev0011 svetlica 1,937 0 22,05028 49,18694 skuev0013 str 19,834 0 18,54667 48,55028 skuev0014 l zky * 24,742 0 22,06222 49,17639 skuev0015 dolna bukovina * 292,654 0 18,94528 48,39278 skuev0016 ko arisk * 25,05 0 21,96 49,23972 skuev0018 l ka pod cintor nom 4,97 0 20,10832 48,68885 skuev0021 vini te 5,803 0 18,06306 48,6475 skuev0023 tomov t l * 1,534 0 18,57528 48,54917 skuev0024 hradn dolina * 14,352 0 18,02611 48,60917 skuev0025 vihorlat * 229,061 0 22,11667 48,89167 skuev0035 ebovsk lesostep * 192,335 0 19,23306 48,19778 skuev0036 litava * 2 629,704 0 19,09333 48,225 skuev0043 kamenn * 823,988 0 21,87528 49,28278 skuev0044 bad nsky prales * 154,019 0 19,05194 48,68556 skuev0045 kopa * 90,542 0 19,45722 48,60167 skuev0046 javorinka * 44,311 0 19,49972 48,61333 skuev0047 dobro sk prales 203,849 0 19,68 48,68139 skuev0048 dukla * 6 860,582 0 21,84417 49,36722 skuev0049 al vium rieky * 13,081 0 22,09444 49,13972 skuev0050 humensk sokol * 286,612 0 21,92528 48,90361 skuev0051 kyjovsk prales * 397,4197 0 22,0163 48,85163 skuev0056 hab ovo * 3,319 0 19,66972 48,59028 skuev0057 ra elinisk oravskej kotliny * 839,56 0 19,73933 49,40802 skuev0058 tlst * 292,518 0 19,36028 48,96083 skuev0059 jel ie * 28,19 0 19,56927 49,03918 skuev0060 chraste 13,729 0 19,52556 49,035 skuev0061 dem novsk slatina 1,666 0 19,57917 49,04528 skuev0062 pr boj * 10,126 0 19,22833 48,74556 skuev0063 ublianka * 24,923 0 22,33333 48,94194 skuev0101 kloko ovsk ra elinisk * 36,72 0 18,58479 49,48075 skuev0102 ertov * 400,755 0 18,23306 49,2775 skuev0103 achtick karpaty * 710,5158 0 17,74681 48,71175 skuev0104 homo sk karpaty * 5 182,636 0 17,14306 48,27278 skuev0105 spi skopodhradsk travert ny * 231,31 0 20,76155 48,99163 skuev0106 mur * 178,823 0 20,48361 48,8775 skuev0107 spi skopodhradsk str ne * 55,049 0 20,69444 49,01556 skuev0108 ordzovianska dubina * 216,322 0 20,78361 49,04917 skuev0109 rajtop ky * 256,336 0 20,86472 48,99639 skuev0110 levo sk dubina * 600,32 0 20,56023 49,04571 skuev0111 drav ianska str 3,291 0 20,48528 49,015 skuev0112 slovensk raj * 16 864,14 0 20,34762 48,90731 skuev0127 teme sk skala * 164,205 0 18,49139 48,875 skuev0128 roko * 5 666,979 0 18,41222 48,76194 skuev0130 zobor * 1 904,791 0 18,11583 48,35806 skuev0131 g me * 73,407 0 18,21861 48,40528 skuev0132 kostolianske l ky * 4,216 0 18,2525 48,41861 skuev0133 h 'rky * 82,419 0 18,18861 48,48694 skuev0134 kulh * 129,16 0 18,08854 48,69552 skuev0135 bo ina * 45,18 0 18,05722 48,62472 skuev0136 doln lazy 7,49 0 18,07718 48,63871 skuev0137 z hrada * 20,0256 0 18,05304 48,63417 skuev0138 livinsk jel ina * 13,726 0 18,08389 48,72333 skuev0139 g novsk slanisk * 45,5046 0 20,34809 49,02159 skuev0140 spi skoteplick slatiny * 24,453 0 20,23066 49,04399 skuev0141 bel * 315,655 0 19,81232 49,09165 skuev0142 hybica * 26,018 0 19,8701 49,06917 skuev0143 biely v h * 39,79 0 19,93438 49,05377 skuev0144 belianske l ky 97,75 0 20,38544 49,21452 skuev0145 medzi bormi * 10,2773 0 19,63139 49,26916 skuev0146 blat * 186,905 0 20,04282 49,09247 skuev0147 arnovica * 18,293 0 18,87417 48,84194 skuev0148 vl ra * 62,272 0 18,07861 49,01778 skuev0149 mackov bok * 3,926 0 19,255 48,76167 skuev0150 erven gr * 245,438 0 19,41861 48,98639 skuev0151 pohorelsk vrchovisko * 20,04 0 20,02306 48,85083 skuev0152 slia ske travert ny * 7,057 0 19,41583 49,05611 skuev0153 horn lazy 38,079 0 19,59944 48,81444 skuev0154 such dolina 3,115 0 19,59605 48,82955 skuev0163 rudava * 1 958,66 0 17,2283 48,52964 skuev0164 rev ca * 35,862 0 19,27667 48,98 skuev0175 sedlisk * 44,87 0 17,8294 48,4512 skuev0185 pramene hru t nky * 217,243 0 19,25333 49,27861 skuev0186 ml ky * 402,475 0 19,02667 48,66028 skuev0187 ra elinisk oravsk ch besk d * 130,943 0 19,25528 49,50083 skuev0188 pilsko * 701,079 0 19,31667 49,52167 skuev0189 babia hora * 504,319 0 19,50778 49,57111 skuev0190 slan voda * 221,605 0 19,49389 49,53417 skuev0191 ra elinisk bielej oravy * 39,168 0 19,28806 49,46833 skuev0192 prose n * 2 300,457 0 19,50417 49,17556 skuev0193 zimn k 37,731 0 19,66083 49,395 skuev0194 hybick ties ava 547,34 0 19,88766 49,09082 skuev0196 pastierske 16,85 0 20,02902 49,05154 skuev0197 salat n * 3 345,004 0 19,33417 48,99028 skuev0198 zvolen * 2 590,065 0 19,22889 48,90333 skuev0199 plavno 52,75 0 19,23972 48,73139 skuev0200 klenovsk vepor * 343,033 0 19,75861 48,68722 skuev0201 gavurky * 68,4214 0 19,13278 48,46366 skuev0202 tre kov 25,207 0 20,14944 48,66611 skuev0203 stolica * 2 811,988 0 20,19694 48,7625 skuev0204 homo a * 22,73 0 20,19167 48,83083 skuev0205 hubkov * 2 792,518 0 21,89833 48,98278 skuev0206 humensk * 215,7953 0 21,94535 48,91235 skuev0207 kamenn baba * 343,443 0 20,93194 49,06056 skuev0209 morsk oko * 16 007,5 0 22,25317 48,8419 skuev0210 stinsk * 1 526,545 0 22,49667 48,99944 skuev0211 da ov * 898,48 0 21,95944 49,3275 skuev0212 mute * 33,08 0 20,27278 48,59361 skuev0216 sitno * 935,56 0 18,87737 48,39511 skuev0221 var nka * 118,69 0 18,93278 49,23861 skuev0222 jele a * 65,47 0 19,64663 49,40771 skuev0224 jerenas 136,848 0 20,76694 48,97333 skuev0225 mur nska planina * 20 257,37 0 19,99806 48,76611 skuev0228 vihrov * 3,77 0 19,7717 49,11123 skuev0229 bukovsk vrchy * 29 230,78 0 22,36694 49,06583 skuev0230 makovica * 441,622 0 22,08 49,02444 skuev0231 brekovsk hradn vrch * 29,6207 0 21,83349 48,90153 skuev0232 laborec * 15,8067 0 21,85837 49,3251 skuev0233 s tok udavy s lovnicou * 21,5656 0 22,04554 49,02097 skuev0234 uli ka * 102,886 0 22,45694 49,00722 skuev0238 ve k fatra * 46 349,42 0 19,07667 48,98222 skuev0239 kozol * 92,873 0 18,75694 49,11444 skuev0240 k ak * 83,37 0 18,63932 48,97751 skuev0241 svr inn k * 219,835 0 18,99611 48,8025 skuev0243 orava * 420,691 0 19,35972 49,25806 skuev0244 harmaneck hlbok jarok 50,532 0 19,00889 48,82056 skuev0245 boky * 168,043 0 19,02333 48,56806 skuev0246 up n 12,653 0 19,265 48,75194 skuev0247 rohy * 24,407 0 19,36861 48,54361 skuev0248 mo idlianska skala * 204,766 0 19,40194 48,60028 skuev0249 hrbat l ka * 180,661 0 19,39361 48,64889 skuev0250 krivo tianka * 707,99 0 21,88687 48,89254 skuev0251 z zrivsk lazy * 2 928,145 0 19,16083 49,27944 skuev0252 mal fatra * 22 253,17 0 19,04806 49,19139 skuev0253 v h * 289,84 51 19,23589 49,11765 skuev0254 mo iar * 7,72 0 19,15167 49,15361 skuev0255 ujsk ra elinisko 13,015 0 18,62 49,06222 skuev0256 str ovsk vrchy * 29 972,99 0 18,48973 49,0118 skuev0258 tlst vrch * 1 216,32 0 18,86583 48,30056 skuev0259 star hora * 2 400,183 0 18,92833 48,31528 skuev0260 m siarsky bok * 287 0 19,09224 48,39808 skuev0262 ajkovsk bralie * 1 620,992 0 18,60472 48,32667 skuev0263 hodru sk hornatina * 10 267,74 0 18,67806 48,39028 skuev0264 kloko * 2 280,825 0 18,7775 48,48667 skuev0265 su * 9 041,332 0 18,90528 48,52667 skuev0266 skalka * 9 715,062 0 19,00778 48,47556 skuev0267 biele hory * 10 146,07 0 17,31222 48,47361 skuev0268 bukov * 9,434 0 17,36778 48,53722 skuev0271 ndorky * 3,1132 0 18,63618 48,29928 skuev0273 vt nik * 10 056,59 0 18,59056 48,61389 skuev0274 bask * 4 032,551 0 18,27639 48,87694 skuev0275 k a st 'l * 4 227,032 0 18,32417 48,82972 skuev0276 kuchynsk hornatina * 3 274,964 0 17,21083 48,36361 skuev0277 nad vinicami 0,484 0 17,42639 48,50639 skuev0278 brezovsk karpaty * 2 671,054 0 17,5575 48,63778 skuev0281 t stie * 28,786 0 19,98917 48,65889 skuev0282 tisovsk kras * 1 469,366 0 19,89861 48,68028 skuev0283 l ky pod besn kom * 83,83 0 20,22028 48,85514 skuev0284 teplick str ne * 352,179 0 20,28861 48,60972 skuev0285 al vium mur a * 224,51 0 20,14438 48,6659 skuev0286 horn dske v pence * 27,77 0 20,65915 48,91661 skuev0287 galmus * 3 200,108 0 20,77861 48,89361 skuev0288 kysuck beskydy * 7 000,94 0 19,03146 49,36979 skuev0289 chm ra 0,976 0 19,09611 49,38333 skuev0290 horn tok horn du * 348,472 0 20,38167 48,98722 skuev0291 sv toj nsky potok * 28,858 0 20,77944 48,92167 skuev0296 turkov * 403,057 0 19,93139 49,02222 skuev0297 brezinky * 8,445 0 20,17456 48,84988 skuev0298 brvni te * 74,771 0 19,23128 48,79216 skuev0299 baranovo * 861,473 0 19,13694 48,7825 skuev0300 skrib ovo * 126,296 0 19,76806 48,98611 skuev0301 kopec 3,761 0 19,22659 48,78298 skuev0302 umbierske tatry * 44 028,46 0 19,48426 48,9117 skuev0303 al vium hrona * 225,05 0 20,02619 48,83659 skuev0304 oravsk vodn n dr * 252,114 0 19,52 49,42389 skuev0305 cho * 1 597,98 0 19,32857 49,1386 skuev0306 pod such m hr dkom 722,45 0 19,82263 49,12032 skuev0307 tatry * 66 994,27 0 19,96611 49,19778 skuev0308 machy * 165,818 0 19,89833 49,12278 skuev0309 poprad * 44,12 0 20,2065 49,06138 skuev0310 kr ovoho sk tatry * 30 478,97 0 19,97904 48,9333 skuev0318 pod bukovou * 537,98 0 21,8485 49,25644 skuev0319 po ana * 3 071,826 0 19,48667 48,68056 skuev0320 indliar * 7,688 0 20,9175 49,04417 skuev0321 salv torsk l ky * 2,677 0 20,94167 49,045 skuev0322 fintick svahy * 746,515 0 21,25222 49,06722 skuev0323 demjatsk kopce * 8,675 0 21,29861 49,10972 skuev0324 radvanovsk skalky * 2,593 0 21,45611 49,05528 skuev0325 medzianske skalky 9,496 0 21,47556 49,04278 skuev0326 strahu ka * 1 170,007 0 21,45806 48,65472 skuev0327 mili * 5 113,016 0 21,46083 48,57694 skuev0328 stredn pohorn die * 7 092,96 0 21,155 48,82639 skuev0330 dunitov skalka * 1,477 0 21,125 48,92306 skuev0331 ergovsk min ol * 4 262,34 0 21,03563 49,22447 skuev0332 ergov * 6 029,045 0 21,15167 49,1875 skuev0333 beliansky potok 2,52 0 20,41803 49,20071 skuev0334 ve k osturnianske jazero 45,516 0 20,21778 49,34278 skuev0335 mal osturnianske jazer 6,465 0 20,20472 49,33972 skuev0336 torysa * 19,145 0 20,72944 49,13917 skuev0337 pieniny * 1 302,36 0 20,47883 49,39134 skuev0338 plave sk trkovisk 66,24 0 20,85529 49,26662 skuev0339 pieninsk bradl * 75,499 0 20,59444 49,35861 skuev0342 drie ovec * 206,204 0 20,67972 48,63889 skuev0343 ple ivsk str ne * 397,485 0 20,405 48,57556 skuev0344 starovodsk jedliny * 468,675 0 20,65333 48,77667 skuev0346 pod str nym hrebe om * 178,398 0 20,39028 48,56111 skuev0348 ierna moldava * 1 894,776 0 20,80056 48,68444 skuev0349 jasovsk dubiny * 35,631 0 20,9675 48,67806 skuev0350 brzot nske skaly * 436,288 0 20,48944 48,59833 skuev0351 folkmarsk skala * 136,768 0 21,00917 48,83056 skuev0353 ple ivsk planina * 2 860,314 0 20,43 48,6225 skuev0354 hnileck ra elinisk * 54,482 0 20,58944 48,82194 skuev0356 horn vrch * 6 027,69 0 20,77972 48,64111 skuev0364 pokoradzsk jazierka * 62,644 0 20,02722 48,42806 skuev0366 drien ansk kras * 1606 0 20,06666 48,5348 skuev0367 holubyho kopanice * 3 900,06 0 17,77114 48,86437 skuev0368 brezovsk dolina * 2,476 0 18,14361 49,09139 skuev0369 pav kov jarok * 22,4874 0 17,66212 48,77152 skuev0371 alostin * 219,503 0 17,44028 48,81778 skuev0372 krivokl tske l ky * 4,33 0 18,13667 49,05889 skuev0373 krivokl tske bradl * 64,492 0 18,15528 49,04111 skuev0374 z hradsk * 9,115 0 17,68667 48,83222 skuev0375 kras n * 64,135 0 18,00611 48,95889 skuev0376 vr atsk bradl * 275,32 0 18,15722 49,07556 skuev0377 lukovsk vrch * 215,61 0 17,86556 48,88917 skuev0378 nebrov * 27,77 0 18,1234 49,11986 skuev0379 kobela * 6,038 0 17,83659 48,77902 skuev0380 temat nske vrchy * 2 520,314 0 17,93 48,65917 skuev0381 dielnice * 104,823 0 18,81 48,96167 skuev0382 turiec a blatnick potok * 264,19 0 18,84784 48,93051 skuev0383 ponick d brava 13,28 0 19,30806 48,69361 skuev0384 klenovsk blat * 3,896 0 19,79361 48,69389 skuev0385 pli kov * 45,696 0 22,13833 49,14472 skuev0386 hostovick l ky * 13,3618 0 22,11599 49,12954 skuev0387 beskyd * 5 348,588 0 22,01667 49,22083 skuev0388 vydrica * 7,321 0 17,1 48,19889 skuev0390 pust pole * 90,351 0 21,44083 48,9325 skuev0397 v h pri zamarovciach 54,558 0 18,04361 48,90389 skuev0398 slan * 35,231 0 20,46941 48,58624 skuev0399 bac ska jel ina * 4,544 0 19,80528 48,84083 skuev0400 detviansky potok * 73,166 0 19,42833 48,59972 skuev0401 dubn cke bane * 241,564 0 21,46694 48,92944 skuev0402 bradlo 0 0 20,18361 48,62417 skuev0503 predhorie * 45,288 0 17,31361 48,37417 skuev0506 orlie skaly * 30,5112 0 17,65098 48,62688 skuev0520 horn tok myjavy * 24,394 0 17,43778 48,66667 skuev0563 ifflovsk * 1,883 0 17,40056 48,79778 skuev0564 dubov * 10,086 0 17,79639 48,66111 skuev0565 prie a ina * 36,659 0 17,99056 48,70611 skuev0566 beckovsk skalice * 33,071 0 17,89667 48,77528 skuev0567 tureck vrch * 31,868 0 17,86028 48,78417 skuev0568 borotov * 1,232 0 17,64472 48,83 skuev0569 pova sk inovec * 34,477 0 18,03722 48,77306 skuev0575 prepadlisko * 8,065 0 17,96194 48,87361 skuev0576 tlst hora * 1,145 0 17,89417 48,88917 skuev0578 jacht r * 30,557 0 17,93611 48,90722 skuev0579 mituchovsk * 1,469 0 17,97333 48,94667 skuev0580 doln brann * 1,343 0 18,08 49,02389 skuev0581 klapy * 6,212 0 18,4225 49,16139 skuev0588 stehl kovsk * 7,471 0 17,91028 48,98833 skuev0589 chynoriansk luh 46,323 0 18,26667 48,62167 skuev0590 bielick bahn * 2,872 0 18,34472 48,62861 skuev0593 sokolec 224,765 0 18,54333 48,5275 skuev0638 revi tsk rybn k 23,551 0 18,72722 48,51444 skuev0640 buja ia l ka 2,142 0 18,93806 48,70611 skuev0641 papradnianka * 23,935 0 18,36611 49,27 skuev0642 javorn cky hrebe * 1 352,693 0 18,33139 49,30278 skuev0643 r ztock penovcov pramenisk * 0,714 0 18,42111 49,3175 skuev0644 petrovi ka * 17,012 0 18,49556 49,29361 skuev0647 bystrick sihly 14,015 0 18,985 49,34833 skuev0648 pr slop * 19,179 0 18,92833 49,42361 skuev0655 predmieranka * 23,171 0 18,58306 49,43889 skuev0657 mal polom * 208,621 0 18,60444 49,49833 skuev0658 stie bielej oravy * 45,931 0 19,47139 49,39806 skuev0659 kole ov 77,561 0 19,25 49,40111 skuev0660 macangov beskyd 16,098 0 19,14972 49,34139 skuev0661 hru t nska ho a * 148,64 0 19,25389 49,31806 skuev0662 vasi ovsk ho a * 49,555 0 19,24611 49,29417 skuev0663 p * 1 799,213 0 19,17611 49,1675 skuev0664 uholn ky * 7,594 0 18,99972 49,12472 skuev0665 stre nianske meandre v hu * 65,168 0 18,88806 49,1625 skuev0667 slne n skaly * 87,328 0 18,71778 49,145 skuev0671 ole nianske ra elinisk * 44,955 0 18,63417 49,47861 skuev0684 jel ovec * 6,489 0 19,27694 48,66083 skuev0694 vrchslatina * 17,854 0 19,63056 48,6525 skuev0695 rohoznianska jel ina * 4,5 0 19,76444 48,76639 skuev0708 primovsk skaly * 7,606 0 20,385 49,01556 skuev0709 po * 34,656 0 20,28278 49,135 skuev0712 osturniansky potok 8,178 0 20,28111 49,34056 skuev0728 podpo ana 1,633 0 19,81194 48,7575 skuev0729 rosiarka 6,057 0 19,82472 48,71111 skuev0730 hodo ov les * 21,552 0 20,07 48,67833 skuev0737 palanta * 758,626 0 20,9175 48,63028 skuev0754 stebn cka magura * 184,645 0 21,23778 49,36528 skuev0755 regetovsk ra elinisko 2,729 0 21,2775 49,42389 skuev0759 horn tok chot ianky 2,557 0 21,79667 49,31167 skuev0761 vydranka * 8,079 0 21,95972 49,28 skuev0763 horn tok v ravy * 18,7277 0 22,01799 49,16933 skuev0777 starobystrick prenovcov pramenisko * 10,29 0 18,94111 49,34278 skuev0778 lipn kovsk 79,441 0 17,93 48,98722 skuev0782 vydrn cka slatina 10,665 0 20,40528 48,98917 skuev0784 ma iansk sys ovisko 19,13 0 20,51168 48,94712 skuev0785 havrania dolina * 10,72 0 20,43222 48,87528 skuev0801 kurinov vrch * 1,2906 17,89053 48,8786 skuev0802 z vla n 11,4146 18,21185 49,09612 skuev0803 hrehorkov 11,6842 18,20465 49,05757 skuev0804 javorec 34,5782 17,40599 48,77497 skuev0805 h jnica 52,7056 17,86856 48,81425 skuev0806 babin * 39,832 18,17903 49,03557 skuev0807 tom ovica * 6,8993 18,13392 48,81592 skuev0808 ravina 12,7411 18,15627 48,8586 skuev0809 matlov 20,8633 18,19673 49,09935 skuev0810 r banice * 7,7293 18,07303 48,8211 skuev0811 om ensk baba * 269,7312 18,23381 48,90975 skuev0812 drietomsk bradlo 9,7964 17,95658 48,90259 skuev0813 trokanovo * 8,0778 18,15516 49,09564 skuev0826 lomnianska ho a * 109,8066 19,27019 49,35219 skuev0828 vahanov * 119,8091 19,44051 49,4554 skuev0830 polesie * 2,7626 18,86532 49,50982 skuev0831 zemanovsk sihla * 9,4406 18,75137 49,44053 skuev0832 al vium markovho potoka * 5,5209 18,80762 49,49889 skuev0833 s tok kysuce s bystricou * 44,89 18,83328 49,40571 skuev0834 adonhora * 572,8856 18,8619 49,28588 skuev0835 stredn tok bystrice * 10,8949 18,925 49,34089 skuev0836 z kop ianske l ky * 23,3678 18,73255 49,37896 skuev0838 rakovsko-milo ovsk ra elinisk * 11,5181 18,70035 49,49328 skuev0839 kol rovick l ky 12,4574 18,49356 49,33718 skuev0845 ba kovsk dolina * 222,9 21,56613 48,76169 skuev0847 pozdi ovsk chrb t * 112,1516 21,82462 48,74812 skuev0852 v h pri hlohovci 123,6555 17,807 48,48777 skuev0853 chtelnick sys ovisko 73,2172 17,59777 48,57382 skuev0855 dedkovo * 15,5043 19,06002 48,77249 skuev0856 doln z lomsk * 7,5351 19,45022 48,64521 skuev0857 mi insk travert ny * 4,075 19,23178 48,66837 skuev0858 horn skala * 120,0554 19,02847 48,7049 skuev0859 ubietovsk d bravy * 26,4805 19,3672 48,75116 skuev0860 ilia sk dolina * 101,3938 19,16667 48,69559 skuev0861 rie ansk l ky 17,1684 19,07421 48,76637 skuev0862 predajnianska slatina * 19,6914 19,48514 48,80934 skuev0863 nad kostolnicou 20,3147 19,39923 48,72548 skuev0864 hol v ok * 36,3605 19,05325 48,72425 skuev0868 v el r * 19,3589 18,47748 48,45067 skuev0871 biely kame * 46,0345 18,69064 48,689 skuev0872 jedzina * 653,2987 19,03925 48,17157 skuev0873 pohronsk inovec * 449,0544 18,49085 48,37779 skuev0874 lnok * 476,7867 18,34383 48,4473 skuev0877 mal bahorec * 5,9974 18,10158 48,38733 skuev0879 lupka * 22,6298 18,07515 48,33873 skuev0880 pra ick dubina * 40,3806 18,09592 48,67779 skuev0881 dubni ka * 196,1796 18,31443 48,7584 skuev0883 nitrick vrchy * 1 220,555 18,45055 48,67619 skuev0885 meandre raj anky 2,1275 18,5848 48,99076 skuev0889 medovarsk dubiny * 219,5719 19,01738 48,24131 skuev0890 p rovsk * 129,6942 18,96304 48,24452 skuev0892 doln chlm * 50,7174 18,98043 48,66658 skuev0893 kune ovsk l ky * 143,8044 18,88963 48,72611 skuev0894 za h 'rkou * 41,2366 21,83334 49,15342 skuev0895 stredn tok laborca * 227,2448 21,91559 49,01334 skuev0896 pod ier a ou * 175,4695 22,09402 49,15885 skuev0897 belu ky * 71,751 21,96228 49,02673 skuev0900 uch nok 82,6309 17,42252 48,75716 skuev0901 havran * 370,6917 17,35706 48,76623 skuev0902 vetern k * 21,3836 17,23266 48,81743 skuev0903 kyse ov a mn chova bo * 36,3345 17,49636 48,63886 skuev0907 peterklin * 94,2725 17,23138 48,44454 skuev0911 vrchn hora * 6,4574 17,04717 48,26181 skuev0918 volovsk bu iny * 61,0227 20,59719 48,74032 skuev0919 klopta 26,2697 20,85977 48,77757 skuev0924 zbojn cka dolina 20,4579 20,82339 48,76854 skuev0925 abo 91,2414 20,98372 48,7923 skuev0926 prostredn dolina * 102,1038 20,97304 48,92813 skuev0927 hr dok * 1,6047 20,62406 49,01315 skuev0928 stredn tok horn du * 295,8429 20,78292 48,9235 skuev0929 helcmanovsk bu ina * 23,1205 20,84079 48,8366 skuev0930 l ansk fatra * 1 454,307 18,8184 49,10102 skuev0931 kola kovsk potok 6,7701 20,65375 49,27247 skuev0932 imonka * 2 977,511 21,48174 48,94888 skuev0933 valalsk voda * 18,4998 20,78493 49,2043 skuev0934 g me sk jarok * 40,0683 21,29832 48,90087 skuev0936 horn tok tople * 363,5323 21,3663 49,23977 skuev0937 becherovsk tisina * 264,7997 21,27793 49,44872 skuev0938 rakytov hora * 861,201 21,51484 48,85268 skuev0939 horn tok ondavy * 301,0427 21,61535 49,21921 skuev0940 horn dske l ky * 66,5084 21,10813 48,89308 skuev0941 trebejovsk skaly * 47,2466 21,23435 48,82404 skuev0942 bradlov p smo * 50,2381 20,95772 49,1998 skuev0943 livovsk jel ina * 31,8837 21,0924 49,27151 skuev0944 horn dske meandre * 198,3329 21,31841 48,55719 skuev0945 trstinn l ky * 60,0202 20,41059 49,19018 skuev0947 stredn tok hrona * 324,8051 18,70558 48,46975 skuev0948 boler zske sys ovisko 56,6374 17,53151 48,45193 skuev0950 jordanec * 2,4646 20,38136 49,36871 skuev0951 stredn tok popradu 265,2987 20,74337 49,28558 skuev0952 tvaro eck l ky 76,1203 21,17814 49,37755 skuev0953 korunkovsk l ky 49,7397 21,75367 49,19566 skuev0954 stredn tok bodvy 51,27 20,89616 48,58354 skuev0956 ubore sk dubiny * 441,2459 19,51219 48,31378 skuev0957 uderinky * 101,3549 19,62925 48,42679 skuev0960 niva turca 137,5545 18,7996 48,87023 skuev0963 osadsk * 112,7492 19,59802 49,44964 skuev0964 lesnianska ho a * 122,8496 19,18961 49,33215 skuev0965 viniansky hradn vrch * 51,95 21,95092 48,82049 skuev0966 vinianska str * 28,4806 21,98848 48,80165 skuev0967 modransko-t ansk pust ky * 352,5105 17,28149 48,33755 skuev0968 pod mis r ami 3,7722 21,08344 49,20143 skuev0969 hradn l ky 59,6392 19,35832 48,59655 skuev1013 str 329,038 0 18,53472 48,54972 skuev1059 jelsie * 8,7879 0 19,56677 49,03596 skuev1149 mackov bok 7,76 0 19,28833 48,77861 skuev1152 slia ske travert ny 0,233 0 19,35111 49,04806 skuev1197 salat n 19,078 0 19,32639 48,95278 skuev1256 str ovsk vrchy * 268,214 0 18,35556 49,00083 skuev1267 biele hory * 24,269 0 17,22889 48,43389 skuev1276 kuchynsk hornatina * 1,453 0 17,17444 48,39417 skuev1278 brezovsk karpaty * 321,84 0 17,56 48,61389 skuev1297 brezinky 0,73 0 20,12361 48,8475 skuev1302 umbierske tatry * 13,088 0 19,58722 48,86194 skuev1303 al vium hrona * 246,2981 0 19,41269 48,79117 skuev1310 kr ovoho sk tatry * 70,935 0 19,88944 49,00917 skuev1337 pieniny * 1 334,09 0 20,51355 49,38381 skuev1375 kras n * 2,167 0 17,98639 48,955 skuev1387 beskyd * 79,001 0 22,03944 49,20472 skuev1388 vydrica * 22,689 0 17,09556 48,21694 skuev2101 kloko ovsk ra elinisk * 9,3131 18,59543 49,47214 skuev2105 spi skopodhradsk travert ny * 43,2285 20,75484 48,99829 skuev2112 slovensk raj * 137,5867 20,34609 48,86546 skuev2133 h 'rky * 173,8501 18,25905 48,47802 skuev2216 sitno 7,7233 18,91258 48,39749 skuev2222 jele a * 93,4366 19,59792 49,41408 skuev2231 brekovsk hradn vrch 11,8492 21,82422 48,90559 skuev2240 k ak * 13,0881 18,63659 48,96918 skuev2284 teplick str ne 9,2447 20,2786 48,60861 skuev2285 al vium mur a * 63,2139 20,20028 48,6531 skuev2288 kysuck beskydy * 382,3406 19,05927 49,345 skuev2304 oravsk vodn n dr * 394,7749 19,61257 49,44515 skuev2318 pod bukovou * 242,5548 21,84855 49,24482 skuev2366 drien ansk kras * 1 281,915 20,08471 48,51104 skuev2367 holubyho kopanice * 433,7957 17,80062 48,83859 skuev2368 brezovsk dolina 1,2465 18,14263 49,09032 skuev2376 vr atsk bradl * 59,7809 18,17423 49,08388

name: council decision (cfsp) 2019/25 of 8 january 2019 amending and updating the list of persons, groups and entities subject to articles 2, 3 and 4 of common position 2001/931/cfsp on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, and repealing decision (cfsp) 2018/1084 type: decision subject matter: european construction; international affairs; civil law; politics and public safety date published: 2019-01-09 9.1.2019 en official journal of the european union l 6/6 council decision (cfsp) 2019/25 of 8 january 2019 amending and updating the list of persons, groups and entities subject to articles 2, 3 and 4 of common position 2001/931/cfsp on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, and repealing decision (cfsp) 2018/1084 the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on european union, and in particular article 29 thereof, having regard to the proposal from the high representative of the union for foreign affairs and security policy, whereas: (1) on 27 december 2001, the council adopted common position 2001/931/cfsp (1). (2) on 30 july 2018, the council adopted decision (cfsp) 2018/1084 (2), updating the list of persons, groups and entities subject to articles 2, 3 and 4 of common position 2001/931/cfsp (the list). (3) in accordance with article 1(6) of common position 2001/931/cfsp, it is necessary to review the names of persons, groups and entities on the list at regular intervals to ensure that there are grounds for keeping them thereon. (4) this decision sets out the result of the review that the council has carried out in respect of persons, groups and entities to which articles 2, 3 and 4 of common position 2001/931/cfsp apply. (5) the council has verified that competent authorities as referred to in article 1(4) of common position 2001/931/cfsp have taken decisions with regard to all persons, groups and entities on the list to the effect that they have been involved in terrorist acts within the meaning of article 1(2) and (3) of common position 2001/931/cfsp. the council has also concluded that the persons, groups and entities to which articles 2, 3 and 4 of common position 2001/931/cfsp apply should continue to be subject to the specific restrictive measures provided for therein. (6) the council has determined that an additional two persons and one entity have been involved in terrorist acts within the meaning of article 1(2) and (3) of common position 2001/931/cfsp, that a decision has been taken with respect to them by a competent authority within the meaning of article 1(4) of that common position, and that those persons and entity should be added to the list of persons, groups and entities to which articles 2, 3 and 4 of common position 2001/931/cfsp apply. (7) the list should be updated accordingly and decision (cfsp) 2018/1084 should be repealed, has adopted this decision: article 1 the list of persons, groups and entities to which articles 2, 3 and 4 of common position 2001/931/cfsp apply is set out in the annex to this decision. article 2 decision (cfsp) 2018/1084 is hereby repealed. article 3 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at brussels, 8 january 2019. for the council the president g. ciamba (1) council common position 2001/931/cfsp of 27 december 2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism (oj l 344, 28.12.2001, p. 93). (2) council decision (cfsp) 2018/1084 of 30 july 2018 updating the list of persons, groups and entities subject to articles 2, 3 and 4 of common position 2001/931/cfsp on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, and repealing decision (cfsp) 2018/475 (oj l 194, 31.7.2018, p. 144). annex list of persons, groups and entities referred to in article 1 i. persons 1. abdollahi hamed (a.k.a. mustafa abdullahi), born 11.8.1960 in iran. passport number: d9004878. 2. al-nasser, abdelkarim hussein mohamed, born in al ihsa (saudi arabia), citizen of saudi arabia. 3. al yacoub, ibrahim salih mohammed, born 16.10.1966 in tarut (saudi arabia), citizen of saudi arabia. 4. arbabsiar manssor (a.k.a. mansour arbabsiar), born 6.3.1955 or 15.3.1955 in iran. iranian and us national. passport number: c2002515 (iran); passport number: 477845448 (usa). national id no.: 07442833, expiry date 15.3.2016 (usa driving licence). 5. asadi assadollah, born 22.12.1971 in teheran (iran), iranian national. iranian diplomatic passport number: d9016657. 6. bouyeri, mohammed (a.k.a. abu zubair, a.k.a. sobiar, a.k.a. abu zoubair), born 8.3.1978 in amsterdam (the netherlands). 7. el hajj, hassan hassan, born 22.3.1988 in zaghdraiya, sidon, lebanon, canadian citizen. passport number: jx446643 (canada). 8. hashemi moghadam saeid, born 6.8.1962 in teheran (iran), iranian national. passport number: d9016290, valid until 4.2.2019. 9. izz-al-din, hasan (a.k.a. garbaya, ahmed, a.k.a. sa-id, a.k.a. salwwan, samir), lebanon, born in 1963 in lebanon, citizen of lebanon. 10. meliad, farah, born 5.11.1980 in sydney (australia), australian citizen. passport number: m2719127 (australia). 11. mohammed, khalid shaikh (a.k.a. ali, salem, a.k.a. bin khalid, fahd bin adballah, a.k.a. henin, ashraf refaat nabith, a.k.a. wadood, khalid adbul), born 14.4.1965 or 1.3.1964 in pakistan, passport number 488555. 12. anli, dalokay (a.k.a. sinan), born 13.10.1976 in p l m r (turkey). 13. shahlai abdul reza (a.k.a. abdol reza shala'i, a.k.a. abd-al reza shalai, a.k.a. abdorreza shahlai, a.k.a. abdolreza shahla'i, a.k.a. abdul-reza shahlaee, a.k.a. hajj yusef, a.k.a. haji yusif, a.k.a. hajji yasir, a.k.a. hajji yusif, a.k.a. yusuf abu-al-karkh), born circa 1957 in iran. addresses: (1) kermanshah, iran, (2) mehran military base, ilam province, iran. 14. shakuri ali gholam, born circa 1965 in tehran, iran. 15. soleimani qasem (a.k.a. ghasem soleymani, a.k.a. qasmi sulayman, a.k.a. qasem soleymani, a.k.a. qasem solaimani, a.k.a. qasem salimani, a.k.a. qasem solemani, a.k.a. qasem sulaimani, a.k.a. qasem sulemani), born 11.3.1957 in iran. iranian national. passport number: 008827 (iran diplomatic), issued 1999. title: major general. ii. groups and entities 1. abu nidal organisation ano (a.k.a. fatah revolutionary council, a.k.a. arab revolutionary brigades, a.k.a. black september, a.k.a. revolutionary organisation of socialist muslims). 2. al-aqsa martyrs' brigade. 3. al-aqsa e.v. 4. babbar khalsa. 5. communist party of the philippines, including new people's army npa, philippines. 6. directorate for internal security of the iranian ministry for intelligence and security. 7. gama'a al-islamiyya (a.k.a. al-gama'a al-islamiyya) (islamic group ig). 8. slami b y k do u ak nc lar cephesi ibda-c (great islamic eastern warriors front). 9. hamas, including hamas-izz al-din al-qassem. 10. hizballah military wing (a.k.a. hezbollah military wing, a.k.a. hizbullah military wing, a.k.a. hizbollah military wing, a.k.a. hezballah military wing, a.k.a. hisbollah military wing, a.k.a. hizbu'llah military wing, a.k.a. hizb allah military wing, a.k.a. jihad council (and all units reporting to it, including the external security organisation)). 11. hizbul mujahideen hm. 12. khalistan zindabad force kzf. 13. kurdistan workers' party pkk, (a.k.a. kadek, a.k.a. kongra-gel). 14. liberation tigers of tamil eelam ltte. 15. ej rcito de liberaci n nacional (national liberation army). 16. palestinian islamic jihad pij. 17. popular front for the liberation of palestine pflp. 18. popular front for the liberation of palestine general command (a.k.a. pflp general command). 19. devrimci halk kurtulu partisi-cephesi dhkp/c (a.k.a. devrimci sol (revolutionary left), a.k.a. dev sol) (revolutionary people's liberation army/front/party). 20. sendero luminoso sl (shining path). 21. teyrbazen azadiya kurdistan tak (a.k.a. kurdistan freedom falcons, a.k.a. kurdistan freedom hawks).

name: council decision (cfsp) 2018/2078 of 21 december 2018 amending decision 2014/512/cfsp concerning restrictive measures in view of russia's actions destabilising the situation in ukraine type: decision subject matter: international security; international affairs; europe; european construction date published: 2018-12-28 28.12.2018 en official journal of the european union l 331/224 council decision (cfsp) 2018/2078 of 21 december 2018 amending decision 2014/512/cfsp concerning restrictive measures in view of russia's actions destabilising the situation in ukraine the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on european union, and in particular article 29 thereof, having regard to the proposal from the high representative of the union for foreign affairs and security policy, whereas: (1) on 31 july 2014, the council adopted decision 2014/512/cfsp (1). (2) on 19 march 2015, the european council agreed that the necessary measures would be taken to clearly link the duration of the restrictive measures to the complete implementation of the minsk agreements, bearing in mind that the complete implementation was foreseen for 31 december 2015. (3) on 5 july 2018, the council renewed decision 2014/512/cfsp until 31 january 2019 in order to enable it to further assess the implementation of the minsk agreements (2). (4) having assessed the implementation of the minsk agreements, decision 2014/512/cfsp should be renewed for a further six months in order to enable the council to further assess their implementation. (5) decision 2014/512/cfsp should therefore be amended accordingly, has adopted this decision: article 1 the first subparagraph of article 9(1) of decision 2014/512/cfsp is replaced by the following: 1. this decision shall apply until 31 july 2019. article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the official journal of the european union. done at brussels, 21 december 2018. for the council the president j. bogner-strauss (1) council decision 2014/512/cfsp of 31 july 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of russia's actions destabilising the situation in ukraine (oj l 229, 31.7.2014, p. 13). (2) council decision (cfsp) 2018/964 of 5 july 2018 amending decision 2014/512/cfsp concerning restrictive measures in view of russia's actions destabilising the situation in ukraine (oj l 172, 9.7.2018, p. 3).

name: decision (eu) 2018/2073 of the european parliament of 24 october 2018 on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the european asylum support office for the financial year 2016 type: decision subject matter: budget; eu finance; eu institutions and european civil service date published: 2018-12-28 28.12.2018 en official journal of the european union l 331/213 decision (eu) 2018/2073 of the european parliament of 24 october 2018 on discharge in respect of the implementation of the budget of the european asylum support office for the financial year 2016 the european parliament, having regard to the final annual accounts of the european asylum support office for the financial year 2016, having regard to the court of auditors' report on the annual accounts of the european asylum support office for the financial year 2016, together with the office's reply (1), having regard to the statement of assurance (2) as to the reliability of the accounts and the legality and regularity of the underlying transactions provided by the court of auditors for the financial year 2016, pursuant to article 287 of the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to the council's recommendation of 20 february 2018 on discharge to be given to the office in respect of the implementation of the budget for the financial year 2016 (05941/2018 c8-0087/2018), having regard to its decision of 18 april 2018 (3) postponing the discharge decision for the financial year 2016, and the reply from the executive director of the european asylum support office, having regard to the actions taken up by commission's directorate-general for migration and home affairs and the management board of the european asylum support office following the parliament's decision of 18 april 2018 postponing the discharge that resulted in the resignation of mr jos carreira from the post of executive director of the european asylum support office on 6 june 2018; having regard to the hearing of 3 september 2018 and to the presented corrective measures already taken by the new ad interim executive director of the european asylum support office since his appointment in june 2018; having regard to article 319 of the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to regulation (eu, euratom) no 966/2012 of the european parliament and of the council of 25 october 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the union and repealing council regulation (ec, euratom) no 1605/2002 (4), and in particular article 208 thereof, having regard to regulation (eu) no 439/2010 of the european parliament and of the council of 19 may 2010 establishing a european asylum support office (5), in particular article 36 thereof, having regard to commission delegated regulation (eu) no 1271/2013 of 30 september 2013 on the framework financial regulation for the bodies referred to in article 208 of regulation (eu, euratom) no 966/2012 of the european parliament and of the council (6), and in particular article 108 thereof, having regard to rule 94 of and annex iv to its rules of procedure, having regard to the second report of the committee on budgetary control (a8-0299/2018), 1. refuses to grant the executive director of the european asylum support office discharge in respect of the implementation of the office's budget for the financial year 2016; 2. sets out its observations in the resolution below; 3. instructs its president to forward this decision, and the resolution forming an integral part of it, to the executive director of the european asylum support office, the council, the commission and the court of auditors, and to arrange for their publication in the official journal of the european union (l series). the president antonio tajani the secretary-general klaus welle (1) oj c 417, 6.12.2017, p. 79. (2) see footnote 1. (3) oj l 248, 3.10.2018, p. 195. (4) oj l 298, 26.10.2012, p. 1. (5) oj l 132, 29.5.2010, p. 11. (6) oj l 328, 7.12.2013, p. 42.

name: council implementing decision (eu) 2018/2077 of 20 december 2018 amending implementing decision 2013/53/eu authorising the kingdom of belgium to introduce a special measure derogating from article 285 of directive 2006/112/ec on the common system of value added tax type: decision_impl subject matter: european union law; taxation; europe; business classification date published: 2018-12-28 28.12.2018 en official journal of the european union l 331/222 council implementing decision (eu) 2018/2077 of 20 december 2018 amending implementing decision 2013/53/eu authorising the kingdom of belgium to introduce a special measure derogating from article 285 of directive 2006/112/ec on the common system of value added tax the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to council directive 2006/112/ec of 28 november 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1), and in particular article 395(1) thereof, having regard to the proposal from the european commission, whereas: (1) by virtue of council implementing decision 2013/53/eu (2) the kingdom of belgium was authorised until 31 december 2015 to apply a special measure to exempt from vat taxable persons whose annual turnover is no higher than eur 25 000. that authorisation was subsequently extended until 31 december 2018 by council implementing decision (eu) 2015/2348 (3). (2) by letter registered with the commission on 12 september 2018, belgium requested a further extension of the special measure for a limited period. (3) in accordance with the second subparagraph of article 395(2) of directive 2006/112/ec, the commission transmitted the request made by belgium to the other member states, by letter dated 14 september 2018. by letter dated 17 september 2018, the commission notified belgium that it had all the information necessary for the appraisal of the request. (4) according to belgium the special measure reduces the administrative burden and compliance costs for small enterprises and tax authorities and therefore contributes to the simplification of tax collection. the special measure is and will remain entirely optional for taxable persons. (5) given the potential positive impact with regard to the reduction of the administrative burden and compliance costs for small enterprises and tax authorities, without any major impact on the total vat revenue to be generated, it is proposed that the special measure be extended for another limited period, until 31 december 2021. (6) as articles 281 to 294 of directive 2006/112/ec governing the special scheme for small enterprises are subject to review, it is possible that a directive amending those articles will enter into force setting a date from which member states are to apply national provisions before the period of validity of the derogation expires on 31 december 2021. if that happens, this decision should cease to apply. (7) the derogation has no impact on the union's own resources accruing from vat because belgium is to carry out a compensation calculation in accordance with article 6(1) of council regulation (eec, euratom) no 1553/89 (4). (8) implementing decision 2013/53/eu should therefore be amended accordingly, has adopted this decision: article 1 article 2 of implementing decision 2013/53/eu is replaced by the following: article 2 this decision shall apply from 1 january 2013 until the earlier of the following two dates: (a) 31 december 2021; (b) the date from which member states are to apply any national provisions that they are required to adopt in the event that a directive is adopted amending articles 281 to 294 of directive 2006/112/ec governing the special scheme for small enterprises. article 2 this decision shall take effect on the date of its notification. it shall apply from 1 january 2019. article 3 this decision is addressed to the kingdom of belgium. done at brussels, 20 december 2018. for the council the president e. k stinger (1) oj l 347, 11.12.2006, p. 1. (2) council implementing decision 2013/53/eu of 22 january 2013 authorising the kingdom of belgium to introduce a special measure derogating from article 285 of directive 2006/112/ec on the common system of value added tax (oj l 22, 25.1.2013, p. 13). (3) council implementing decision (eu) 2015/2348 of 10 december 2015 amending implementing decision 2013/53/eu authorising the kingdom of belgium to introduce a special measure derogating from article 285 of directive 2006/112/ec on the common system of value added tax (oj l 330, 16.12.2015, p. 51). (4) council regulation (eec, euratom) no 1553/89 of 29 may 1989 on the definitive uniform arrangements for the collection of own resources accruing from value added tax (oj l 155, 7.6.1989, p. 9).

name: council decision (eu, euratom) 2018/2076 of 20 december 2018 amending the council's rules of procedure type: decision subject matter: demography and population; politics and public safety; electoral procedure and voting; eu institutions and european civil service date published: 2018-12-28 28.12.2018 en official journal of the european union l 331/218 council decision (eu, euratom) 2018/2076 of 20 december 2018 amending the council's rules of procedure the council of the european union, having regard to the treaty on european union, having regard to the treaty on the functioning of the european union, having regard to the treaty establishing the european atomic energy community, having regard to article 11(6) of the council's rules of procedure (1), whereas: (1) when an act is to be adopted by the council acting by qualified majority, it has to be verified that the member states constituting the qualified majority represent at least 65 % of the population of the union. (2) that percentage is calculated according to the population figures set out in annex iii to the council's rules of procedure (the rules of procedure). (3) article 11(6) of the rules of procedure provides that, with effect from 1 january each year, the council is to amend the figures set out in that annex, in accordance with the data available to the statistical office of the european union on 30 september of the preceding year. (4) in view of the united kingdom's withdrawal from the union, annex iii to the rules of procedure should also include the figures applicable from the day following that on which the treaties cease to apply to the united kingdom. (5) the rules of procedure should therefore be amended accordingly for the year 2019, has adopted this decision: article 1 annex iii to the rules of procedure is replaced by the following: annex iii figures concerning the population of the union and the population of each member state for implementing the provisions concerning qualified majority voting in the council 1. for the purposes of implementing article 16(4) teu and article 238(2) and (3) tfeu, the population of the union and the population of each member state, as well as the percentage of each member state's population in relation to the population of the union, for the period from 1 january 2019 until the date on which the treaties cease to apply to the united kingdom or until 31 december 2019, at the latest, shall be as follows: member state population percentage of the population of the union (%) germany 82 719 022 16,12 france 67 221 943 13,10 united kingdom 66 238 007 12,90 italy 61 166 142 11,92 spain 46 659 302 9,09 poland 37 976 687 7,40 romania 19 523 621 3,80 netherlands 17 321 110 3,37 belgium 11 413 058 2,22 greece 10 738 928 2,09 czechia 10 493 154 2,04 portugal 10 291 027 2,00 sweden 10 157 000 1,98 hungary 9 778 371 1,91 austria 8 802 000 1,71 bulgaria 7 050 034 1,37 denmark 5 774 877 1,13 finland 5 501 930 1,07 slovakia 5 443 120 1,06 ireland 4 830 392 0,94 croatia 4 105 493 0,80 lithuania 2 808 901 0,55 slovenia 2 066 880 0,40 latvia 1 934 379 0,38 estonia 1 319 133 0,26 cyprus 864 236 0,17 luxembourg 600 124 0,12 malta 475 701 0,09 eu-28 513 274 572 threshold (65 %) 333 628 472 2. for the purposes of implementing article 16(4) teu and article 238(2) and (3) tfeu, the population of the union and the population of each member state, as well as the percentage of each member state's population in relation to the population of the union, for the period from the day following that on which the treaties cease to apply to the united kingdom to 31 december 2019, shall be as follows: member state population percentage of the population of the union (%) germany 82 719 022 18,50 france 67 221 943 15,04 italy 61 166 142 13,68 spain 46 659 302 10,44 poland 37 976 687 8,50 romania 19 523 621 4,37 netherlands 17 321 110 3,87 belgium 11 413 058 2,55 greece 10 738 928 2,40 czechia 10 493 154 2,35 portugal 10 291 027 2,30 sweden 10 157 000 2,27 hungary 9 778 371 2,19 austria 8 802 000 1,97 bulgaria 7 050 034 1,58 denmark 5 774 877 1,29 finland 5 501 930 1,23 slovakia 5 443 120 1,22 ireland 4 830 392 1,08 croatia 4 105 493 0,92 lithuania 2 808 901 0,59 slovenia 2 066 880 0,46 latvia 1 934 379 0,43 estonia 1 319 133 0,30 cyprus 864 236 0,19 luxembourg 600 124 0,13 malta 475 701 0,11 eu-27 447 036 565 threshold (65 %) 290 573 768 article 2 this decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the official journal of the european union. it shall apply from 1 january 2019. done at brussels, 20 december 2018. for the council the president e. k stinger (1) council decision 2009/937/eu of 1 december 2009 adopting the council's rules of procedure (oj l 325, 11.12.2009, p. 35).