label
stringclasses 2
values | text
stringlengths 165
803
|
|---|---|
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Fredrick can now know that Alfred can know that nobody is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Virgie knows whether someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Kelly does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Kelly can now know that Virgie can know that Kelly is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Amy does not know whether Heather is thirsty. Hypothesis: Angel can now know that Amy can know whether or not nobody is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Luz does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Luz does not know whether Luz's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Joe can now know that Margarita's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Lloyd knows whether Lloyd is thirsty. Hypothesis: Carl can now know whether Lloyd can know whether Carl is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Christopher knows whether Laura is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Christopher knows whether Laura is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Laura knows whether Christopher is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Christopher knows whether someone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Christopher can now know whether Laura can know that nobody is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Patrick knows whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Brenda knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Brenda can now know whether Patrick can know whether Patrick's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Leslie can now know whether Elizabeth can know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Kimberly does not know whether Johnnie is thirsty. Hypothesis: Johnnie can now know that Thomas can know whether Johnnie is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Eliza knows whether Eliza's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Patricia can now know that Eliza can know that Patricia's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Nancy knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Melvin can now know that Nancy can know that Brenda's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Angel knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Angel can now know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Rosalie's card is shown to Rosalie. Rosalie's card is shown to Patricia. Patricia's card is shown to Patricia. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Patricia knows whether Patricia picked a red card. Hypothesis: Rosalie can now know that Patricia can know whether Patricia picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Lloyd can now know whether Frank can know whether someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Dona does not know whether Dona's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Frank does not know whether Frank's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Lola can now know whether Frank can know whether Lola's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Eduardo does not know whether James is thirsty. Hypothesis: David can now know whether or not nobody is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Consuelo does not know whether Evelyn is thirsty. Hypothesis: Jennifer can now know that Mark is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). James's card is shown to James. Liliana's card is shown to James. James's card is shown to Liliana. Liliana's card is shown to Liliana. Myron's card is shown to Liliana. Myron's card is shown to Lawrence. James's card is shown to Myron. Lawrence's card is shown to Myron. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: James can now know whether Lawrence can know that Lawrence picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Frank knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Tracy can now know that Joy can know that David's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Eva does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Eva does not know whether David is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Gregory does not know whether David is thirsty. Hypothesis: Gregory can now know whether David is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Betty knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Betty can now know whether someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Cinda's card is shown to Cinda. Elizabeth's card is shown to Cinda. Thomas's card is shown to Cinda. Cinda's card is shown to Elizabeth. Elizabeth's card is shown to Elizabeth. Cinda's card is shown to Thomas. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Cinda can now know that Elizabeth can know whether someone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Pearl's card is shown to Pearl. Pearl's card is shown to Joshua. Joshua's card is shown to Joshua. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Pearl knows whether someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Pearl does not know whether Joshua picked a red card. Hypothesis: Pearl can now know whether someone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Bonnie's card is shown to Franklin. Corey's card is shown to Bonnie. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Bonnie can now know that Corey picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Willie knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Aaron can now know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Thomas does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Constance can now know that Matthew can know that Jerry's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Heather is not thirsty. It is publicly announced that Heather is not thirsty. It is publicly announced that Hazel does not know whether Cheri is thirsty. Hypothesis: Heather can now know whether Viola can know that Heather is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Brian knows whether someone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Thomas can now know whether Ernesto can know that Thomas is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Jean knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: John can now know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Derrick knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Marie can now know whether Derrick can know that someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Darrell's card is shown to Jeremy. Jeremy's card is shown to Darrell. Christina's card is shown to Darrell. Darrell's card is shown to Christina. Gonzalo's card is shown to Christina. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Darrell can now know whether Gonzalo picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Nancy knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Nancy can now know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Donald can now know that Donald is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Bridget is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Ian does not know whether James is thirsty. Hypothesis: James can now know whether Bridget can know whether or not nobody is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Troy does not know whether Leo is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Leo does not know whether Thelma is thirsty. Hypothesis: Thelma can now know that Sara can know whether Leo is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Constance's forehead is not muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Bernadine knows whether Constance's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Constance can now know that Margaret can know that Bernadine's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Ashley knows whether Frank's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Frank does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Ashley can now know whether Ashley's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Ralph knows whether Ralph is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Leon does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Donald can now know that Ralph can know that someone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Lisa does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Darleen can now know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Chelsea knows whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Ralph does not know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Ralph's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Ralph can now know that Chelsea can know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Kristen is not thirsty. It is publicly announced that Clarence does not know whether Richard is thirsty. Hypothesis: Joseph can now know that Kristen can know whether Kristen is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Valarie's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Bianca can now know that Valarie can know that Valarie's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Sherry's card is shown to Ora. Ora's card is shown to Cesar. Dorothy's card is shown to Cesar. Ora's card is shown to Dorothy. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Sherry can now know whether Cesar can know whether or not everyone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Dorothy knows whether someone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Dorothy can now know that Timothy can know that Mark is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Tessa knows whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Tessa knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Tessa can now know whether Christine can know that Tessa's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Christopher knows whether Melissa's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Melissa can now know whether Christopher can know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Chi can now know that Chi's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Michael does not know whether Michael's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: James can now know that Bobbie can know whether Bobbie's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Daniel does not know whether Monica is thirsty. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Marcia can now know that Jennifer can know that Marcia is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that James knows whether James is thirsty. Hypothesis: Sherrie can now know that someone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Francis knows whether James's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: James can now know that Francis can know that Francis's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Christie does not know whether Francis is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Christie is not thirsty. It is publicly announced that Ruth knows whether Christie is thirsty. Hypothesis: Francis can now know that Sheena can know that nobody is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Cari's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: James can now know that Jacqui can know whether Charis's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Robert knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Velma can now know that someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Shirley's forehead is not muddy. It is publicly announced that Raymond's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Shirley can now know that Shirley's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Ward is not thirsty. Hypothesis: Ward can now know that Kent can know whether or not nobody is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Richard knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Emily knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that James knows whether Emily's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Emily can now know that Richard's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Edward's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Edward knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Gerardo knows whether Conrad's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Robert does not know whether Robert's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Conrad can now know that Robert can know that Conrad's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: David can now know whether Alan can know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Margaret knows whether Margaret is thirsty. Hypothesis: William can now know that nobody is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Jason knows whether Michael's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Jason can now know that Helena can know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). William's card is shown to Sabina. Rene's card is shown to Rene. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: William can now know whether Sabina can know that nobody picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Angela's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Casey can now know that Amanda can know that Casey's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Craig knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Craig can now know whether Albert can know that someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Jean's card is shown to Marjorie. Marjorie's card is shown to Jean. Jean's card is shown to Jean. Marjorie's card is shown to Elizabeth. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Jean can now know whether Marjorie can know whether Elizabeth picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Sara's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Mary can now know whether Sara can know that someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that William knows whether Earl's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that William's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Willis can now know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Christopher's card is shown to Wendy. Jennifer's card is shown to Wendy. Mary's card is shown to Christopher. Christopher's card is shown to Mary. Jennifer's card is shown to Mary. Christopher's card is shown to Jennifer. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Jennifer does not know whether Mary picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Christopher knows whether someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Wendy can now know that nobody picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Dorothy's card is shown to Dorothy. Yvonne's card is shown to Dorothy. Dorothy's card is shown to Yvonne. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Yvonne does not know whether or not everyone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Yvonne can now know that Dorothy can know whether someone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Germaine can now know that Stephen can know whether Germaine is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Denice's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Denice can now know whether Harold can know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Tina knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Heriberto knows whether Joseph's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Tina can now know that Joseph's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Craig's card is shown to Craig. Clifton's card is shown to Craig. Suzi's card is shown to Craig. Timothy's card is shown to Clifton. Timothy's card is shown to Suzi. Suzi's card is shown to Suzi. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Clifton can now know that someone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Kenneth knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Kenneth knows whether Walter's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Kenneth's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Walter can now know whether Kenneth can know that everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Nelson knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Melissa can now know whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that John's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Jamie does not know whether Jamie's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Shirley can now know whether someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Lillian's card is shown to Beatrice. Patsy's card is shown to Patsy. Beatrice's card is shown to Lillian. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Lillian does not know whether Lillian picked a red card. Hypothesis: Beatrice can now know that Lillian picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Jacob knows whether or not nobody is thirsty. Hypothesis: Andrea can now know whether Jacob can know whether Jacob is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Claudia does not know whether Claudia's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Leonard can now know whether David can know whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Leo does not know whether Marie is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Leo does not know whether Katherine is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Marie is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Katherine does not know whether Leo is thirsty. Hypothesis: Leo can now know whether Katherine can know that Katherine is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Benito's card is shown to Anita. Joshua's card is shown to John. Joshua's card is shown to Joshua. Anita's card is shown to Benito. John's card is shown to Benito. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Joshua does not know whether or not everyone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Benito can now know that Joshua can know that someone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Randall knows whether Randall is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Barbara knows whether or not nobody is thirsty. Hypothesis: Clare can now know that everyone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Mary does not know whether Elwood is thirsty. Hypothesis: Colin can now know that someone is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Renee does not know whether Shannon is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Renee does not know whether Paul is thirsty. Hypothesis: Renee can now know that Shannon can know that Shannon is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Charles does not know whether Charles's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Charles's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Rodney can now know that Gracie can know that nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Jefferson can now know that Carlos can know that Diane's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Mary's card is shown to Mary. Mary's card is shown to Robert. Robert's card is shown to Shannon. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that Mary knows whether or not everyone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Robert can now know whether Shannon can know whether or not everyone picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Wendell knows whether Carlos is thirsty. Hypothesis: Wendell can now know that Carlos is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that John's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Noel can now know whether Noel's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Sheila's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: James can now know whether Sheila can know whether Martin's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Katharine knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Catherine can now know that Terry's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Robert knows whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Michael can now know that Robert can know whether someone's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Raymond's card is shown to Donald. Raymond's card is shown to Raymond. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Donald can now know whether Alexis picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Jeffrey's card is shown to John. John's card is shown to Jeffrey. John's card is shown to Doris. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Doris can now know that Jeffrey can know that nobody picked a red card. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Margaret does not know whether Margaret's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Leonora knows whether or not everyone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Leonora can now know that Margaret's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. There is a mirror in the room. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Arlene knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Bryan knows whether Bryan's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that not everyone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Arlene knows whether someone's forehead is muddy. Hypothesis: Bryan can now know whether or not nobody's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are four persons. Everyone is visible to others. Each person draws a card, face unrevealed (red or black). Danny's card is shown to Danny. Janice's card is shown to Danny. Danny's card is shown to Carolyn. Carolyn's card is shown to Carolyn. Danny's card is shown to Mario. Danny's card is shown to Janice. It is publicly announced that someone picked a red card. Hypothesis: Mario can now know whether Danny can know whether Mario picked a red card. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone's forehead is muddy. It is publicly announced that Teresa's forehead is not muddy. Hypothesis: Teresa can now know whether Debra's forehead is muddy. |
The hypothesis logically follows the premise | Premise: There are two persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Cecilia does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Cecilia does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Cecilia does not know whether Marty is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Cecilia knows whether or not nobody is thirsty. Hypothesis: Cecilia can now know that Cecilia is thirsty. |
The hypothesis does not logically follow the premise | Premise: There are three persons. Everyone is visible to others. It is publicly announced that someone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Cecil does not know whether or not everyone is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Robert does not know whether Nancy is thirsty. It is publicly announced that Nancy knows whether or not everyone is thirsty. Hypothesis: Nancy can now know that Nancy is thirsty. |