topic_shift
bool
2 classes
utterance
stringlengths
1
7.9k
session_id
stringlengths
7
14
false
Uh - huh.
QMSum_87
false
Exactly !
QMSum_87
false
Yeah , exactly !
QMSum_87
false
Yeah
QMSum_87
false
Well , there you go. Fine , that 's alright , that 's OK. And and , you know , in contrast , so Deborah d and also Deborah Tannen 's thesis she talked about differences of these types , that they 're just different styles , and it 's um you you can't impose a model of there of the ideal being no overlaps , and you know , conversational analysts also agree with that , so it 's now , universally a ag agreed with. And and , als I mean , I can't say universally , but anyway , the people who used to say it was strict , um now , uh don't. I mean they they also you know , uh uh , ack acknowledge the influence of sub of subcultural norms and cross - cultural norms and things. So , um Then it beco though so just just superficially to give um a couple ideas of the types of overlaps involved , I have at the bottom several that I noticed. So , uh , there are backchannels , like what Adam just did now and , um um , anticipating the end of a question and simply answering it earlier , and there are several of those in this in these data where
QMSum_87
false
Mm - hmm.
QMSum_87
false
because we 're people who 've talked to each other , um we know basically what the topic is , what the possibilities are and w and we 've spoken with each other so we know basically what the other person 's style is likely to be and so and t there are a number of places where someone just answered early. No problem. And places also which I thought were interesting , where two or more people gave exactly th the same answer in unison different words of course but you know , the basically , you know everyone 's saying " yes " or you know , or ev even more sp specific than that. So , uh , the point is that , um overlap 's not necessarily a bad thing and that it would be im i useful to subdivide these further and see if there are individual differences in styles with respect to the types involved. And that 's all I wanted to say on that , unless people have questions.
QMSum_87
false
Well , of course th the biggest , um result here , which is one we 've we 've talked about many times and isn't new to us , but which I think would be interesting to show someone who isn't familiar with this is just the sheer number of overlaps.
QMSum_87
false
Yep.
QMSum_87
false
That that Right ? that that , um
QMSum_87
false
Yes , yes !
QMSum_87
false
Oh , OK interesting.
QMSum_87
false
Yeah.
QMSum_87
false
here 's a relatively short meeting , it 's a forty forty plus minute meeting , and not only were there two hundred and fifteen overlaps but , uh I think there 's one one minute there where there where where there wasn't any overlap ?
QMSum_87
false
Hundred ninety - seven.
QMSum_87
false
I mean , it 's uh throughout this thing ?
QMSum_87
false
It 'd be interesting
QMSum_87
false
It 's You have
QMSum_87
false
Well , at the bottom , you have the bottom three.
QMSum_87
false
Yeah.
QMSum_87
false
S n are
QMSum_87
false
So four four minutes all together with none none.
QMSum_87
false
But it w
QMSum_87
false
Oh , so the bottom three did have s stuff going on ? There was speech ?
QMSum_87
false
Yes , uh - huh. Yeah. But just no overlaps.
QMSum_87
false
OK , so if the this
QMSum_87
false
It 'd be interesting to see what the total amount of time is in the overlaps , versus
QMSum_87
false
Yes , exactly and that 's that 's where Jose 's pro project comes in.
QMSum_87
false
Yeah , yeah , I h I have this that infor I have th that information now.
QMSum_87
false
I was about to ask
QMSum_87
false
Yeah.
QMSum_87
false
Yeah.
QMSum_87
false
Hmm.
QMSum_87
false
Oh , about how much is it ?
QMSum_87
false
The the duration of eh of each of the overlaps.
QMSum_87
false
O oh , what 's what 's the what 's the average length ?
QMSum_87
false
M I I haven't averaged it now but , uh I I will , uh I will do the the study of the with the with the program with the uh , the different , uh the , nnn , distribution of the duration of the overlaps.
QMSum_87
false
You don't know ? OK , you you don you don't have a feeling for roughly how much it is ? Yeah.
QMSum_87
false
mmm , Because the the uh , @ @ is @ @.
QMSum_87
false
Yeah.
QMSum_87
false
The duration is , uh the variation the variation of the duration is uh , very big on the dat
QMSum_87
false
Mm - hmm.
QMSum_87
false
I suspect that it will also differ , depending on the type of overlap involved.
QMSum_87
false
but eh
QMSum_87
false
Oh , I 'm sure.
QMSum_87
false
Yeah.
QMSum_87
false
So backchannels will be very brief
QMSum_87
false
Because , on your surface eh a bit of zone of overlapping with the duration eh , overlapped and another very very short.
QMSum_87
false
and
QMSum_87
false
Yeah. Yeah.
QMSum_87
false
Uh , i probably it 's very difficult to to because the the overlap is , uh on is only the in the final " S " of the of the the fin the the end the end word of the , um previous speaker with the the next word of the the new speaker.
QMSum_87
false
Mm - hmm.
QMSum_87
false
Um , I considered that 's an overlap but it 's very short , it 's an " X " with a and the idea is probably , eh when eh when eh , we studied th th that zone , eh eh , we h we have eh eh confusion with eh eh noise.
QMSum_87
false
Mm - hmm.
QMSum_87
false
With eh that fricative sounds , but uh I have new information but I have to to study.
QMSum_87
false
Yeah. Yeah , but I I 'd u
QMSum_87
false
Can I
QMSum_87
false
go ahead.
QMSum_87
false
Yeah.
QMSum_87
false
You split this by minute , um so if an overlap straddles the boundary between two minutes , that counts towards both of those minutes.
QMSum_87
false
Yes. Mm - hmm. Actually , um um actually not. Uh , so le let 's think about the case where A starts speaking and then B overlaps with A , and then the minute boundary happens. And let 's say that after that minute boundary , um B is still speaking , and A overlaps with B , that would be a new overlap. But otherwise um , let 's say B comes to the conclusion of of that turn without anyone overlapping with him or her , in which case there would be no overlap counted in that second minute.
QMSum_87
false
No , but suppose they both talk simultaneously both a a portion of it is in minute one and another portion of minute two.
QMSum_87
false
OK. In that case , um my c the coding that I was using since we haven't , uh incorporated Adam 's , uh coding of overlap yets , the coding of Yeah , " yets " is not a word. Uh since we haven't incorporated Adam 's method of handling overl overlaps yet um then that would have fallen through the cra cracks. It would be an underestimate of the number of overlaps because , um I wou I wouldn't be able to pick it up from the way it was encoded so far.
QMSum_87
false
I I
QMSum_87
false
We just haven't done th the precise second to sec you know , second to second coding of when they occur.
QMSum_87
false
I I I 'm I 'm I 'm confused now. So l l let me restate what I thought Andreas was saying and and see.
QMSum_87
false
Uh - huh.
QMSum_87
false
Let 's say that in in second fifty - seven of one minute , you start talking and I start talking and we ignore each other and keep on talking for six seconds.
QMSum_87
false
Yep. OK. Mm - hmm.
QMSum_87
false
So we go over So we were we were talking over one another , and it 's just in each case , it 's just sort of one interval. Right ?
QMSum_87
false
Mm - hmm ?
QMSum_87
false
So , um we talked over the minute boundary. Is this considered as one overlap in each of the minutes , the way you have done this.
QMSum_87
false
No , it wouldn't. It would be considered as an overlap in the first one.
QMSum_87
false
OK , so that 's good , i I think , in the sense that I think Andreas meant the question ,
QMSum_87
false
That 's that 's good , yeah , cuz the overall rate is
QMSum_87
false
Yeah.
QMSum_87
false
Statistical.
QMSum_87
false
Yeah.
QMSum_87
false
Mm - hmm.
QMSum_87
false
right ?
QMSum_87
false
Yeah. They 're not double counted.
QMSum_87
false
Other - otherwise you 'd get double counts , here and there.
QMSum_87
false
Yep.
QMSum_87
false
Ah but , yeah.
QMSum_87
false
Yeah.
QMSum_87
false
And then it would be harder
QMSum_87
false
Yeah.
QMSum_87
false
Yeah.
QMSum_87
false
I should also say I did a simplifying , uh count in that if A was speaking B overlapped with A and then A came back again and overlapped with B again , I I didn't count that as a three - person overlap , I counted that as a two - person overlap , and it was A being overlapped with by D.
QMSum_87
false
Mm - hmm.
QMSum_87
false
Because the idea was the first speaker had the floor and the second person started speaking and then the f the first person reasserted the floor kind of thing.
QMSum_87
false
Yeah.
QMSum_87
false
These are simplifying assumptions , didn't happen very often , there may be like three overlaps affected that way in the whole thing.
QMSum_87
false
I want to go back and listen to minute forty - one.
QMSum_87
false
Yeah , yeah.
QMSum_87
false
Cuz i i I find it interesting that there were a large number of overlaps and they were all two - speaker.
QMSum_87
false
Yeah.
QMSum_87
false
I mean what I thought what I would have thought in is that when there were a large number of overlaps , it was because everyone was talking at once , but uh apparently not.
QMSum_87
false
That 's interesting. That 's interesting.
QMSum_87
false
Yeah. Yeah. Mmm.
QMSum_87