Datasets:

dirtycomputer

/

Wikipedia_Talk_Labels

like 0

` :Being LGBT does not make you a representative of all LGBT people. But you miss the point - it doesn't have to be offensive, it just has to make the environment less welcoming and push the idea that LGBT are ``other``. ===Further response to Clpo13 on ANI=== The template in question is , which is about as civil a way to oppose gay marriage as possible. This is a silly an issue as, say, a Republican editor taking offense at someone using . clpo13(talk) I agree it's one of the more ``civil`` ways you could express bigotted views but you are missing the point that there is no reason to be expressing the views unsolicited in the first place and all these little ``expressions`` add up and suddenly you wonder why LGBT are under-represented on wikipedia (or even more extremely, women, because there are even worse biases there). Contrast with another box on his user page saying he is a bash scripter. This kind of thing does not implcitily criticise a bunch of people for who they are and so while it could cause controversy in the sense that zsh or heck fish users like myself may think him to be wrong it does no damage, it just adds character and would be daft to complain about. You see the difference?`

user

blocked

train

::::::::::::::Josh, you think she is not a vegan, I think she is not a vegan, the band think she is not a vegan, Betty thinks she is not a vegan. The source does not say she is a vegan. We all agree that, when the word has its normal meaning, she is not a vegan. I really cannot see what there is to argue about. You have been bold, you have been reverted, you have edit warred but there is clearly no consensus for your change. You should know better.

article

random

train

== Yeah, here you are ==

user

random

train

REDIRECT Talk:List of television stations in Veracruz

article

random

train

== Pictures of notable Puerto Ricans in info box == For the sample photos of notable Puerto Ricans in the info box, Why do you guys intend on putting the whitest-looking Puerto Ricans up there??? As if there are no mixed-looking Puerto Ricans or Afro-Puerto Ricans who are notable, famous, and worthy of recognition.

article

blocked

train

:I do know Romm, but I have no family, financial or business connections with him. I do not believe that I have a WP:conflict of interest with respect to this article. I saw Dr. Romm in 2007 and asked if I could take that photo of him for the article, and he said yes. I note that this is a WP:Good Article, which means that it has been thoroughly reviewed by a disinterested reviewer who found its content to be neutrally written and did not object to its style, as you can see from the GA review record. Of course, anyone and everyone is welcome to improve the article.

article

random

test

` ``Unfortunately, I tried to write him to express some of my points of disagreement, but the discussion turned out to be impossible, as he has his own very stubborn opinion about ``what is the standard interpretation`` which he pretends to be exactly the same as his (no matter that the rest of the physics community disagrees !) and cannot tolerate to consider any different opinion about it. Thus, indeed, cutting himself off from the rest of the physics community.`` Disappointing. Do you still have those correspondences? `

user

blocked

train

== Hello == How have you been, old friend?

user

blocked

dev

The Billy the Kid article with my contributions has been vandalized on or about Dec. 14, 2015 by someone calling themselves KrakatoaKatie. What had been the most detailed, and accurate account of Billy the Kid's life has been replaced with pure garbage. I ask every to look at the last version I submitted one concerned and compare it to what it has been replaced with. I ask anyone who is knowledgeable about the subject, and who doesn't have some sort of agenda, to take a look at what has happened and let your feeling be known. Thank you.

user

blocked

test

==ACT OF VANDALISM BY KRAKATOA KATIE== This person has completely obliterated all of my contributions to the Billy the Kid article. KrakatoaKatie has replaced what had been the most detailed, and accurate, account of Billy the Kid's life that has appeared on Wikipedia so far and reverted to an account that contains absolute garbage. This was done as an act of PURE VANDALISM by a person that has an agenda that has nothing to do with improving the content of this article. Quite the contrary - the clear intent hear was to destroy that article - WITH MALICIOUS INTENT - and replace it with something inferior that takes the treatment back to a comic book level. I ask any board members, editors, and Wild West History buffs associated with Wikipedia to look at my last version, and compare to what KrakatoaKatie has replaced it with. I ask all of you to compare this act of vandalism by someone with an agenda, to the contribution made by someone who has a proven, 40-year, track record as a Wild West historian. I hope you will all speak out and prevent this sort of thing from happening to others who are making an honest effort to improve the accuracy of Wikipedia articles. Please make your feelings known. Hopefully you will agree that my article should be restored. THank you Jack DeMattos

article

blocked

train

==Continued Acts of Vandalism by KrakatoaKatie on Billy the Kid article== Would you please take a look at the blatant acts of vandalism being conducted by one KrakatoaKatie on my contributions to the article on Billy the Kid. This person has destroyed what had been a highly detailed, historically accurate, treatment of Billy the Kid's life and replaced it with something that is at a comic book level. I ask that you look at my treatment of the Kid's life, as it existed only a couple of days age before this malicious individual went to work. What this person is doing is not only an insult to anyone who takes the history of the Wild West seriously, it is a clear affront to common decency. Thank you. (Jack DeMattos)

user

blocked

test

` == BENN JORDAN == This article has been tagged for deletion and is quite dubious as the musician clearly wrote it himself, is not notable, and has 18 seperate articles for purported releases that are unsourced, not notable or never actually released. Total Puff Piece. Please assist by locking page to amateur editors, and ensure the deletion process runs its course on the talk page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benn_Jordan — Preceding unsigned comment added by • `

user

random

train

` ::The opinion is not that of a CNN contributor. CNN makes it clear that this is a fringe view and there isn't going to be a successful ``citizen's arrest`` of Kissinger anytime soon. `

user

random

train

*Note: I changed the conventional long name to British Rule in India and the common name to British Raj. As a test, so if revert at will.

article

random

train

== wtf you temp block me for? ==

user

blocked

train

` ::Thank you Czolgolz! Lets hope the Hyenas let it be there. A lot of similar lists on userpages were lost also in the last months. And I don't think that all people who contributed in the past will find it there, but I will try my best to help. I wonder what articles about ``super old people`` were also lost in this ``cleanup`` that Legacypac mentioned? Regards `

user

random

dev

` :There are two issues: you must choose a username that represents you, not an organization (it doesn't have to be, and probably shouldn't be your name), and you're writing articles about what we must assume is your employer. Please read WP:COI for more on that, and WP:CORP for a discussion of the notability guidelines for companies. Wikipedia isn't intended as a means of SEO or promotion. There was no indication of notyability, and all articles must have content and notability supported by reference to substantial coverage in major third-party sources. Please suggest a different username, and please read the COI link. `

user

random

train

or can someone please any my block review. Since you two were involved in the block, I thought one of you could. I did what Swarm told me so can I at least have the condolence of a response?

user

blocked

dev

:: could you direct me to an admin? I have made a block review request and it has been a day with no response. I can also just wait for Swarm if you don't want to do anything, as I would understand.

user

blocked

train

{{unblock|reason=I have already submitted an unblock request but no has answered. I have my reason to be unblocked above the first review request. I did what User:Swarm told me to do, so I think I am ready to start over.

user

blocked

dev

U dam stupid son of a why u want trouble wij the polece kew

user

blocked

train

:hi biblioworm, I am a bit short of internet at the minute! I'll try to reply later ) -

user

blocked

train

` - Hi made all your problems disappear in under 4 minutes. No wasting time now over ``Importance``, or in yet another Edit Bore (yaaaaawn). With h/er elegant problem solving, the problem is now unmoot. That's how our problems should be solved around here, I think. - Thanks again and Mabuhay! - LoRETta/ `

article

blocked

dev

` - Have any of you seen a child blown up in front of you? Have you ever run across a minefield to save your dying friends? How are your ``edit wars`` anything like that? And SSTflyer, I admit that I'm a douche, and I'm working on that. How about I work on not being so smug, and you work on not being so judgmental? No more talking with me. Back to Solitary. Mabuhay! - LoRETta/ `

article

blocked

train

:::::::: TH1980 mentioned that he did a spot check back during the good article review, and I know he has access to almost all of the sources. If users interpret the sources in different ways, then those can be discussed on a case by case basis. However, there have been plenty of experienced users who have already done spot checks and found no outstanding problems. In this thread though, it's hard to see what point there is in discussing anything other than the topic of the thread. The discussion will become too convoluted to follow. I did propose mediation as an alternative to request for comment, but currently I have not heard any reason why request for comment is not the best manner to resolve the issue of how to structure the article.

article

blocked

train

:::In which case why haven't you reported me?

user

blocked

train

::::::::::I don't think I saw any cases where I agreed with your reading of the source. You interpreted the text differently, but I don't recall a case where the information in the article text was at variance with the information in the book. TH1980's interpretation of the text was presumably similar to my own. Sometimes your interpretation of sources is rather unique, but if you just consider the basic question of whether the facts presented in the book match the facts presented in the article, then there was never really much of a problem. I think TH1980 and myself look at the sources in a more straightforward and conservative manner. ::::::::::The reason why I know that TH1980 has access to the sources is because, firstly, he explicitly mentioned having access to Henshall and other sources during the good article review, and secondly, he himself has cited these books in the article. You can surely see that the answers to your questions are much more straightforward than sinister. Off-topic questions have filled up the talk page before, but none of it actually achieved anything. We certainly have a chance to achieve real progress, but going off on so many tangents, in a thread which is supposed to be about article structure, is hardly productive. If we don't have a consensus on article structure, we would do better to discuss the relative merits of mediation versus request for comment.

article

blocked

dev

` ::::::::::::We're at the point where there is no sense in dwelling on it. You have been widely accused of following me here and were sanctioned for issuing threats against me in direct relation to this article, but harping on about that isn't going to improve the article. We're on this talk page to improve the article, so let's do it. You yourself created this thread with the title ``this article NEEDS thematic sections``. Therefore, we can deal with this issue by discussing it, but the only problem is that I'm not sure the users here alone will arrive at a consensus. What is needed is concrete proposals for how to reach consensus on this issue, and I've made several such proposals. In keeping with the topic of the thread that you yourself created, I want to know whether you have an idea of your own better than a request for comment. `

article

blocked

dev

Thank you! I actually planned to finish this by 2015. Hope I will manage.

user

random

train

The ISIS comment comes up in the first few search hits because it is CURRENT. That's how google works. But again, compare with Donald Trump. His most recent remarks regarding Muslims and terrorist families do not warrant a separate section. That's how a BLP is written.

article

blocked

train

Can I suggest we use the sand-box to create a section on socio-political views which would include whatever controversial remarks Cheng might have said instead of engaging in an edit war? Thank you so much

article

blocked

dev

Please look at the talkpage of the article. I am trying to reach a consensus, even suggesting the use of the sandbox before including sections that violate BLP NPOV. But the users keep reverting my changes.

user

blocked

test

` 2015 (UTC) : Wouldn't your version of ``neutrality`` cause a POV tilt your way? Let's see you take a whack at it. 18:22, 15 December`

article

blocked

train

` :::: In the Donald Trump article, the controversy is a SUBSECTION of another SUBSECTION ``Presidential Campaign 2016`` of a SECTION heading``Politics``. This has been my point over and over again. Sigh. It's not a standalone section! Just because it has multiple sources does not mean it should be included as a standalone point! It should be a subsection of a section that says ``Political Views`` or ``Socio-Political Commentary`` for the article to be balanced. `

article

blocked

test

**Fuck you, you psychotic fanboy retard.

user

blocked

test

` == December 2015 == According to the webpage of Jay (Jay2518), ``Hi my name is Jay (Jay2518) and you know I love Microsoft Studios and Sega better than Sony Computer Entertainment, and also I love Sega and Microsoft Studios a whole lot better than Nintendo. I also love parachuting video games that Microsoft Studios and Sega will make more of these video games than Sony Computer Entertainment and Nintendo, I hope Sega and Microsoft Studios must team up making a whole lot of parachuting video games you know for sure.```

user

blocked

train

]] is a dumbfuck racist Undertale fan.

user

blocked

train

` ::: I suggest instead of arguing please just follow other politician's templates. Especially Singaporean politicians. Which of these has a ``controversy`` section? `

article

blocked

dev

::::::::::::::Although I don't understand why the above comment was initially reverted, even so I think it would be preferable if a fully neutral party opened the request for comment. Perhaps IJethroBot can be convinced to open the request, or else recommend a different solution. Requests for comment normally only include content issues, but there are surely some important content issues here which could benefit from comments to determine consensus.

article

blocked

train

== teacher temple == hello, you lunch the delete request in teacher temple in 2015 11, may I know the reason why?

user

blocked

train

== you know? == I already finish the main temple structure. whatever you say, arrogant guy.

user

blocked

dev

:::There do seem to be Gators listed as lettering for 1911 baseball, even in present day media guides. For example, one B. G. Langston.

article

random

test

` :: Oh no , I am so disappointed in you! (1) Your response was not in the prescribed Limerick format, or in any form of poetry; (2) you did not explain your Edit in the Summary (diff) These two violations alone qualify you for WP:SHUN, which is great, cos then you can join me here in Solitary. ::I'll get back to you later on desired Efficient Outcomes, and other terms we oughta precisely define (redudundant, but necessary) as we (inc you) write . But first: :: In the language of The Asylum, I strongly disagree with your uncertainty over the need for Reciprocity within our Kruel-Aide-drunk Community. There are just a very few things of which I am certain, but I am certain of this: If we are ever to transform the Wikipedia Community from a ``War``-torn ``battlefield`` into a peaceful Library, or a Learning Playground, or a - Reciprocity is Step #1. :: I scanned all your contributions as CorporateM to The Projects, using the creepiest and best tool so far from The LabCoats, and I think you might be right: The Community does owe you some. Or at least I do. So I'll put on hold my request to you, while I work on your request to me first. ::As always, my thanks, and ::Mabuhay! - LoRETta/ `

user

blocked

train

== NPOV concerns == I have some concerns about wording and viewpoints expressed in this article. A broader view taken toward that subject would be informative.

article

blocked

test

== NPOV concerns == Based on terminology and grouping I have some questions about WP:NPOV and a broader view might be needed.

article

blocked

dev

== NPOV concerns == Based on terminology used I have some concerns about WP:NPOV and a broader view might be warranted.

article

blocked

test

== Russia == Aren't they on the government's side and not part of the coalition.

article

blocked

test

:: Oppose: the episodes page includes detailed synopses that would clutter up the main page unnecessarily, although I propose the episodes page could be redirected to a page simply titled Commander in Chief (season 1)

article

blocked

train

== user page == don't modify my user page,I will only you warning one time.

user

blocked

train

:::::Right, I'm not saying you shouldn't jump on other FACs as well, that would be silly ) I see you're doing other FACs and that's great. - Dank

user

random

train

== Removing cast sections in film articles has to stop == Removing casting news doesn't justify removing source material. You may not agree how it looks, but it is encyclopedic and any reader has a right to know who and when that certain cast member joined the movie. So stop removing cast sections and source material about it.

user

random

test

== Complex Iteration == I've discovered that not only fractional iteration is possible, but also complex iteration. It's not as intuitive as fractional iteration, but it does make sense once you have a new model for what iteration means. Probably the simplest explanation is with orbitals in the complex plain: iterating to a real values generates the complex orbitals as paths. Iterating to imaginary powers, meanwhile, generates paths perpendicular to the orbitals at every point. You need the entire vector field of orbitals to know the new path. For example, iterating a linear function (multiplying by a constant) creates orbitals which are rays. Iterating to imaginary powers creates paths with are concentric circles. After that, complex iteration can be done by composing real and imaginary values. For a more precise derivation, I had to invent a new type of derivative, it looks at the instantaneous change in value at a point as the function iterates. The formula for this derivative is: f*(x) = lim n->0 (fn(x) - x)/n Which is equivalent to the derivative of f's Abel function. The key about this derivative is it has the property that fn* = f x n . This enables iteration to imaginary powers to be calculated directly. Ultimately I think it is equivalent to taking the analytic extension of the Abel function, but it's a bit more intuitive than Taylor series witchcraft. I've done the calculations to arrive at Euler's identity using this method rather than the typical one, and graphically it makes much more sense: once it's understood how complex iteration works, it's just geometry to find the imaginary value e must be raised to in order to complete the arc from 1 to -1.

article

blocked

train

` == Book: The Fear Babe == ``Only In Death`` removed an attempt to create a section on the well-selling book covering Vani's tactics. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Vani_Hari&diff;=prev&oldid;=695670915 I propose that it should be included as a section since a published book is different from the other forms of media and criticism, per Wikipedia's manual of style. I also request that if OID is sincere, s/he should suggest the alternative wording they prefer for a mention of the book's existence as valid, published criticism of Hari. `

article

blocked

train

` ``unless it was an expert or highly notable by itself`` See also: http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevensavage/2015/10/29/taking-on-the-merchants-of-food-fear/ `

article

blocked

train

` My concern is that an entire article on Billy the Kid was removed for no valid reason. That article not only contained my contributions, but the contributions of others. It contained the most detailed bibliography on Billy the Kid offered yet on Wikepedia. It also included 147 detailed citations. There is no valid excuse for removing that article and substituting the mess that is there now. Blocking me for real or imagined infractions is one thing. Destroying the article that I, and others, had worked long and hard on - and replacing it with an absolute piece of junk - is quite another. You have done extensive work on Wikipedia's Wyatt Earp article. How would you feel if all of your efforts were deleted? What was done to my last version of the Billy Kid article is nothing less than criminal - and that crime is against Wikipedia and all of those unselfish people who have tried to make it a reliable source. The joke is, I considered myself finished with the Billy the Kid article when it was suddenly removed. Now if you, and the others at Wikipedia ``sincerely value your expertise. Wikipedia needs knowledgeable authors like you,`` as you say. You will restore my last version of the article. Here is my good faith offer: If Wikipedia will restore that article at the point where I last left it, I promise that I will not go near it again. I look forward to the work that your expert editors can do to correct the ``encyclopedic tone,`` and encourage that effort. I also look forward to submissions and improvements to this article by other Wikipedians. Please note that I have claimed to ``own`` the Billy the Kid article. All I was trying to do was to provide the most accurate template on the subject of Billy the Kid that others could work from. The quickest way to do this is restore the article as it was when it was moved. I have no intention of trying to get it back to that point, by correcting the absolute mess that is up there right now. I trust you and all the forthright editors at Wikipedia to correct the ``encyclopedic tone`` that you consider lacking. I would also appreciate the removal of those tags that have suddenly appeared at the top of articles I contributed to on Bat Masterson and Luke Short. They suddenly appeared on the Masterson and Short articles at the exact same time my last version of Billy the Kid. It is not that I should be treated differently because of my credentials in the Wild West History field ... the fact is that no one should have to be treated that way. This is childish behavior from those who don't have the best interest of Wikipedia involved. I won't bother asking to be unblocked ( which, of course, I should be ) since I have to leave the clowns that put that block in place something they can brag about ... as in the vein of ``Well, I guess we showed him!`` Now the time has come to show everyone else what Wikipedia really stands for. The place to start is with your good faith restoration of my Billy the Kid article exactly as it was when I last worked on it. Unless I am specifically asked for clarification, on some historical point on the Kid,by you, and others involved with Wikipedia, I have absolutely no intention of doing anything further on the subject of Billy the Kid. My best wishes to you and all of those who labor so hard at making Wikipedia great. Happy holidays to you all ... you already know what I want for Christmas as far as Wikipedia is concerned. `

user

blocked

dev

Indeed, I noticed the hand trembling as well.

article

blocked

test

== .... == SCREW YOU.....

user

blocked

test

== .... == Screw YOU...shitbag

user

blocked

train

REDIRECT Talk:Sir John Crofton

article

blocked

dev

recently u posted false information about Boise st footballs stadium it is illegal to say bsu football stadium has 36,000 for there stadium if u keep this up the sheriff will be in contact with u and your family I am a under cover cop who watches every move some one does on wiki I'm only giving u a warning next time u will be in some Sirius stuff k so don't post stuff kik tho again already have a nice day.

user

blocked

test

`, 18 December 2015 (UTC) :::::::WP:DUE yes. It has a place under this protocol for sure. My hunch in starting the thread was right afterall. I guess the rest is kinda humerous, the arguing and such. Its a pity though its not smoother. 06:29`

article

blocked

train

`, 18 December 2015 (UTC) :::::::::That was well said Sir 07:57`

article

blocked

train

does the interaction ban also include an inability to nominate anymore of his articles? I ask because there was one more I wanted to nominate before I move on from that phase of what I wanted to do here.

user

blocked

dev

Iwane Matsui, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.

user

random

test

` ::Wikipedia has plenty of built-in mechanisms to deal with content disputes, such as request for comment and mediation, and eventually recourse to one or another might have to be seriously considered. I'm sure everyone thinks that every other user has some sort of ``behavioral issues``, but talking about them on this talk page so far hasn't solved anything. Unless we take IJethroBT's advice, the only remaining solution is to actually follow the rules of Wikipedia, which require that article talk pages include only content discussions and that users seek resolution of content disputes through normal mechanisms including request for comment. `

article

blocked

dev

== Iwane Matsui == Iwane Matsui, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.

user

blocked

train

The Bitch mother who bore them all muajaja

user

blocked

test

Hi, Oswah. Polishchuk it's wrong name, endonym of these people is Poleshuks. And exuse me i'm so noobie, can you help me with Poleshuks language links? If no say it here.

user

blocked

train

` == Honours == Why if we add the ``runners-up`` there also ? `

article

blocked

train

==Kits== Can you put please the kits next to each other on horizontal not on vertical ! Thank you

article

blocked

train

:::: lol dunno which part of uk he/she lives.. hahaha Bollywood movies are widely released in London n around uk, I live here and I know that prove me wrong !

user

blocked

train

` :I gave you the warning on Baker because you removed every reference in an entire section leaving it totally uncourced. Why? Also seeing your warnings in the past you have a habbit of not updating timestamps and yet in this edit you missed it again.   `

user

random

dev

, but the software couldn't handle more than one character at a time

article

random

dev

` == Still waiting for ``FreeKnowledgeCreator`` to explain why he objects to the english language == Well dude?`

article

blocked

test

u no wat ass hole go fuck your self and stop ben a dick head u in trouble no motha fucka u be getin a visit fronm the fbi.buddy so keep it coming and yourl never find me

user

blocked

train

::I would love to talk about your objections on the article's talk page and we can discuss the sources merits or my reasons for adding material.

user

random

train

==Season's Greetings== To You and Yours!

user

random

dev

` == Lets Discuss Genetics and Logic, Here == Does the absence of EU alleles in one geographically Western, Clovis era man (Anzick-1) inherently ``disprove`` the presence of early EU man on the continent? Of course it doesn't. Following that logic, Norse colonization of the Americas is all a big myth as there is no genealogical record of their presence among Canadian first nations people. With current (and most meaningful) archaeological discoveries on the pre-Clovis issue clustering almost entirely in the mid-Northeast of the United States and being unarguably WAY pre-Clovis per strata, the 'genetic refutations' of Solutrean have been tangential at best, agenda driven at worst. The genetic itself question is a critical one, one that deserves robust discussion and the article does, in fact, contain just such a discussion, however the statement that sequencing remains from Anzick-1 'disproves' Solutrean is not a valid statement. `

article

blocked

dev

going on logic alone

article

blocked

dev

:I think you're confused. DC had a Captain Marvel (which they bought the rights to), before Marvel had a Captain Marvel.

article

blocked

test

` My edit is sound. Inserting the word ``ultimately`` implies - unsupported by the text - that Rothbard had any conflict about supporting or not supporting the idea. `

article

blocked

train

I say this as someone who is mostly Solutrean Neutral, Cinmar point neutral and skeptical of the 1971 flint point found in VA that was French originating (it was found in proximity to early American European population, such people kept things around as curios). There's a lot to debate about Solutrean Hypothesis or archaic European man in North America. Anzick-1 does not disprove it. Can we stop saying that, please?

article

blocked

train

== To disrespectful and ignorant Iryna Harpy == No such thing as disruptive editing. It's backed up with facts and data. I should know better given as I'm Colombian myself, unlike yourself.

user

blocked

train

== To disrespectful and ignorant Iryna Harpy == http://www.semana.com/especiales/articulo/los-suizos/81649-3 https://www.helvetia.edu.co/index.php/nosotros/historia http://www.bogotaturismo.gov.co/pagina-area/diversion http://www.banrepcultural.org/bogot/biblioteca-luis-ngel-arango/sala-de-audiovisuales/auditorio/evento/ernst-r-thlisberger-una-vis http://www.geoatico.net/recursos/exp_helvetica/cronica_secundaria.pdf etc. Also, I'd suggest you read a bit on the British Legion presence in the Colombia area, the English-influenced neighbourhood in large parts of Bogota as a result of affluent English families settling in during the first half of the last century let alone all the immigration influx during the earlier centuries, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. The Swiss and British input is far more noticeable than others, that's why at the end of the sentence you see 'amongst others'. And also, what does African peoples have to do with WHITE Colombians. You would expect other white peoples pages to be linked with the White Colombian page.

user

blocked

train

` ::I don't know if I'd put it quite like that, but... from my quick reading of that source, I didn't notice it using the term ``political correctness`` anywhere. It could be mentioned on political censorship, but I don't see how it belongs here. Implicitly asserting that it's related (and that it's eg. an example of political correctness) is original research unless you have a source saying so specifically. Even listing explicit uses of the term is tricky (because it's original research to collect a bunch of usages and use that to try and research the history yourself); the best sources are academic papers or published books by historians or experts on culture and the like that explicitly detail the history, use, and meaning of the term. (Since this is such a hot-button topic, actual histories that mention it explicitly are not hard to find! There's no need for us to try and do our own original research anyway.) But listing examples of political censorship definitely doesn't work; we need, at the very least, some source connecting it directly to the concept of political correctness before it belongs here. `

article

random

train

:: Just wondering: how do you propose we arrive at 'peer review' on a prehistoric hypothesis? Like evolution, it can never be conclusively proven, but for drawing a reasoned conclusion based on the evidence that we have (and the people in academia who will debate that). Stanford and Bradley stand awfully tall as far as their academic bona fides, which is why this hypothesis has an article in the first place. I'm going to seriously edit down the 'genetic research' subheading which is clearly wp:undue weight, if for no reason other than it doesn't begin to conclusively disprove Solutrean, even though its constantly flogged as being decisive by the agenda-driven types.

article

blocked

test

` == A ``hint of longing?``, a ``HINT of longing?`` It's more like an avalanche of teenage angst because your crush won't reciprocate! == a melancholic song about unrequited love, especially because it’s all crescendo and no denouement: Listeners never find out if the main character actually gets her wish—much less if the person she’s confessing her love to actually feels the same way. “All I Want For Christmas Is You” is a one-sided confession of wants and desires, not a song describing or celebrating a consummated relationship. “Honestly, the lyrics, to me, come off as hopelessly sad,” Williems says. “I’ve read the critical reception section of the song’s Wikipedia page, and I can’t help but think the critics weren’t really listening. One critic seems to claim there is a ‘hint of longing,’ which might be the understatement of the century. If you wanted to get real bummed about it, I think the argument could be made that the song is denouncing the artificiality surrounding the spectacle of Christmas,” he continues. “Saying that you are so hung up on the negative of not being with one person on Christmas that you can’t embrace the joy of the holiday is really pretty sad, but also movingly honest for a pop Christmas song. http://www.avclub.com/article/why-mariah-careys-christmas-hit-will-be-around-for-229110 Someone sort it out. `

article

blocked

train

` == A ``hint of longing?``, a ``HINT of longing?`` It's more like an avalanche of teenage angst because your crush won't reciprocate! == a melancholic song about unrequited love, especially because it’s all crescendo and no denouement: Listeners never find out if the main character actually gets her wish—much less if the person she’s confessing her love to actually feels the same way. “All I Want For Christmas Is You” is a one-sided confession of wants and desires, not a song describing or celebrating a consummated relationship. “Honestly, the lyrics, to me, come off as hopelessly sad,” Williems says. “I’ve read the critical reception section of the song’s Wikipedia page, and I can’t help but think the critics weren’t really listening. One critic seems to claim there is a ‘hint of longing,’ which might be the understatement of the century. If you wanted to get real bummed about it, I think the argument could be made that the song is denouncing the artificiality surrounding the spectacle of Christmas,” he continues. “Saying that you are so hung up on the negative of not being with one person on Christmas that you can’t embrace the joy of the holiday is really pretty sad, but also movingly honest for a pop Christmas song. http://www.avclub.com/article/why-mariah-careys-christmas-hit-will-be-around-for-229110 Someone sort it out. Who is Williems? And why can't he/she spell ``Williams`` properly? `

article

blocked

test

if this is really world you enter my yard, I will use my hunter rifle blow out you head. but we are in wiki, so I will flag you as vandals.

user

blocked

train

==More seasons== Someone from Turkey please to create more seasons in Turkish Cup! People request to read more about it ! There is not so many editions, and not many editions to create! I do same for my country, and I have to create many many other pages ! We have to cooperate ! Thank you very much !!

article

blocked

dev

== missing movie == The god-awful 2012 movie starring Vincent Fegan.

article

blocked

train

== Season's Greetings == To You and Yours!

user

random

train

== Missing editions == Why if we add in the table the editions who were not played and add the information why the final was not play ?

article

blocked

test

:::::I was gonna ask if Obi Wan ever refers to him as Anakin indirectly and should we go to some pointless effort to insert that into the plot there too. His real name is unimportant, so unimportant that the guy says he killed Ben and Ben is dead, so it's not even a name he considers real, he's become someone else. /

article

random

train

get a proper job daft cunt

user

blocked

train

Get a proper job kilt lifter

user

blocked

test

== Semi-protected edit request on 20 December 2015 == On the reception section, it's change to Postive reviews, why not revert it back to widespread critical acclaim.

article

blocked

train

` I think I have a way to resolve this unfortunate Billy the Kid issue. If you will give me a moment, I first want to explain how we got to this point from my perspective. A lot has been made over my alleged failure to adhere to the preferred Wikipedia manual of style. That failure on my part is simply not being as well versed on the various Wikipedia guidelines as I probably should be. I am not trying to disrupt your standards. Indeed, I would appreciate any and all the help I can get, along with the active participation by experienced Wikipedia editors to bring the Billy the Kid article in line with Wikipedia standards. I am not trying to defy or insult anyone. There seems to be a misunderstanding that suggests I seem to think that I have some kind of ``ownership`` over the subject of Billy the Kid. This is not true now - and it never was true. Perhaps some of this misunderstanding stems from a sentence I could have worded better which read as follows: ``All I was trying to do was provide the most accurate template on the subject of Billy the Kid that others could work from.`` If I could take back the word ``template`` I would, since it was clearly construed as meaning something totally different from what I was trying to state. What I was trying to state comes down simply to accurate ``facts and dates`` regarding Billy the Kid, and bringing the state of those many ``facts and dates`` up to date to this point in time. Before it was removed, my Wikipedia article reflected the status of Billy the Kid research as it exists today. There were 147 detailed citations, which sourced the work of such noted Kid historians as Philip J. Rasch, Robert M. Utley and Frederick Nolan among many others. Before it was last removed on December 17, that version that I was working on contained the most accurate version of the Kid's life that has yet appeared on Wikipedia. That version of the article contained contributions by several researchers - not just me. Then it all went away, when the article was removed for reasons that make no sense - at least not for anything contained in the article itself. I attempted to restore the version that I had been working on at 11:47 17 December 2015. I attached a note that read: ``Please do not delete this version of the Billy the Kid article. It contains the contributions of several respected historians, and remains the most comprehensive, and accurate treatment of the subject that has appeared on Wikipedia so far.`` My restoration only stayed up for 4 minutes and and was once again removed at 11:51 on 17 December 2015. I made what turned out to be a final attempt at restoration six minutes later at 11:57 17 December 2015. This time I left a note that said ``The continued deletion of an article by myself, and several other contributors, goes beyond vandalism and borders on being criminal.`` The crime was against historical honesty, accuracy and, indeed, the goals that Wikipedia is supposed to stand for. The total lack of respect to those who contributed to the article goes without saying. This time, for my troubles, I was blocked - and my blocked status remains in effect until Dec. 24. Merry Christmas. The irony is that when the version of the article I last worked on was deleted, on December 17, I was done with it. I had no plans for further changes. I had hoped that others would then jump in - particularly those who possess the Wikipedia editorial skills I lacked to make it go along with your manual of style and other Wikipedia preferences. Billy the Kid, as you all know, was born in lower Manhattan in New York City. I would like to use New York City as an analogy for how I view Wikipedia. Since the early 1960's I've spent a considerable amount of time, off and on, in New York City. Those of you who have been there frequently know that there is always construction going on. Indeed, change is a constant in New York City. Change is also a constant with any Wikipedia article. As stated, it was never my intention to ``own`` the article. I never expected, or wanted, it to remain frozen in place with my contributions. I was looking forward to contributions from other historians and researchers who could provide further info on the ``facts and dates`` contained in the article, as well as working with experienced Wikipedia editors who could correct any mistakes that didn't go along with your preferred ``encyclopedic`` standards. Anyway, we seem to have ended up, at least for now, at cross purposes. Why it got to this point I don't understand. I am not looking for adversaries, at Wikipedia - I am looking for the collaboration of any and all who truly want to make the Billy the Kid article the best it can possibly be today - and, with the continued contributions of others, in the years that follow. The quickest way to make this happen is by taking my last version of my article, incorporating whatever changes you feel are needed for that version, and, after doing that, restoring it to the Billy Kid page. You only have to look at the mess that is currently up there now and compare it to the version I, along with several others, worked on to see that this is the right thing to do. Many of you are probably familiar with the interview the founding father of Wikipedia, Jimmy Wales, gave to 60 minutes back on April 5, 2015. He wasn't referring to this specific situation, but he could have been when he said: ``Our biggest problem with bias, and things that stay for a long time are actually on very obscure topics. You know, a topic that not that many people are looking at. And so if something's wrong, it can persist for some time.`` Something is wrong here, and it shouldn't persist any longer. Christmas is almost here. Can we all take a deep breath, put our differences behind us, and agree to work together on the very best version possible of the Billy the Kid article? You know, Billy the Kid is not only one of the four or five most recognized names in Wild West History as well as a very familiar name in American History in general. People who know absolutely nothing about the Wild West have heard his name. Let us come together and give him the biography he deserves and stop this fight which no one wins. Thank you. `

user

blocked

train

::I don't know who Malik is, but I know who you are, NoCal100. POV pushing isn't allowed under ARBPIA3, either, you know.

user

blocked

test

== Why tina turner has no legacy IN WIKI? == Diana_Ross to have a legacy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diana_Ross but tina turner no why ? PLS.You should write to her.

user

random

test