rev_id
int64 37.7k
700M
| comment
stringlengths 5
10k
| year
int64 2k
2.02k
| logged_in
bool 2
classes | ns
stringclasses 2
values | sample
stringclasses 2
values | split
stringclasses 3
values | attack
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
694,222,698 | ::::::::First off, we are not discussing 2015, we are discussing 2016; that much should be obvious. Second, the fact that we've always done things a certain way does not erase the possibility of improving our process. I would argue, and I'd hope you would agree, that these articles have only gotten better over time. That improvement did not happen because we sat on our hands and were content with the level of quality we had already reached. Third, I do not think Lotus/Renault and Marussia/Manor are relevant situations to each other. With Lotus, we know the Renault takeover is going to be done, and we know the name will be changed. Both have been confirmed. With Marussia, as F1 fans we know the name was only kept to keep their FOM TV rights money, and we have every reason to believe it will be changed now that Marussia is entirely out of the picture, but that's nonetheless original research that isn't fit for this article. I now agree that I was wrong to fight for the Renault name, but Lotus is equally wrong. We have no specific confirmation of the former, but we do have confirmation that it won't be the latter. So what we know for sure is very little - in fact, I believe all we know is the drivers and the engine. That that's why it should say TBA-Lotus. Additionally, think of it from this perspective: a person reads a news article announcing that the Renault takeover has been completed. They read another story from the head of Renault Sport indicating the Lotus team name will be dropped. These articles are from reliable sources and feature direct quotes. They then come here and see...Lotus. Their only reaction is going to be that Wikipedia is clearly wrong. And they're right to think that. And if you DON'T agree that reliably reported quotes from the head of organizations are good enough sources for Wikipedia, then there's quite a lot that needs to be removed from this article. You can't have it both ways. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
694,226,320 | ::::::::::No, we are not moving on. The team has said the name will be changed, just like they also said they'll be using Renault engines next year. Why, on the 4th, did think that a well-sourced quote from a team official was enough to change Lotus from their current engines, Mercedes, to the Renault engines they plan to use next year? And why, now that it's a matter of my idea versus his idea, does he take the opposite approach? Regardless, his reasoning above is inherently flawed. This is not about Lotus' current team name. This is about the team name of their 2016 entry. And that name is: to be announced. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
694,227,824 | == You're right, but == considering that 50% of stuff that is on wikipedia, is false and fictional and thanks to you I got a F on my assessment | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | dev | false |
694,229,297 | ::::::::::::You have read literally none of what I wrote. I already explained why Lotus and Marussia are two different situations. Look, TBA is the way the page was BEFORE you went and got half of the involved parties blocked. Just revert it back to that, back to our prior consensus, and we can discuss further here. If you actually listen to me and read my points I'm sure you will agree; there's just no way around the fact that TBA is the correct choice for now. Please let me know where the confusion lies. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
694,229,378 | ` :::::Sorry if you feel that my edits are ``nonsensical``, but I don't appreciate you coming to my talk page to pick a fight, by saying that you ``don't tolerate`` them. Civility means that you should comment on the content, not on the contributor. Glad to see that you have finally decided to do that on the talk page of the article... ` | 2,015 | true | user | random | test | false |
694,229,399 | And if you have reverted isolated foreign words (German) in certain articles, I have not seen then please revert back, accordingly. Thanks, | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
694,229,867 | All I'm asking is that you read the points I'm making and respond to them. There is no need to get uncivil again. I apologize for my prior behavior, but given the fact that many people within the team have clearly stated that the name will be changed, and given that we use such sources for like 80% of the content in this article, I simply fail to see how we can do anything but include the team name (for 2016, NOT 2015, NOT the present team name) as TBA. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
694,241,703 | ` == Blocked as a sockpuppet == ` | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
694,261,085 | == Well == can you and this liz person please put it back up on my user page or whatever it is called so i can get a better mark. You just could of done that in the first place instead of DELETING IT | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
694,261,376 | == And == tell that liz creep that how can a horror story be a personal story!?!?!? | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
694,273,765 | ` ==Queen as Commissioner-in-Chief== The only citation given for stating that the Queen is the Commissioner-in-chief is in the Toronto Star article, which does not give any detail. However, there is nothing in the RCMP Act which refers to the Queen being Commissioner-in-Chief. From the Star article, it sounds as if HM was ``bumped up`` to honorary Commissioner-in-Chief to make room for Prince Charles to be named ``Honorary Commissioner``. Unless someone can find a more definite reference, I think it should read ``Honorary Commissioner-in-chief.`` ` | 2,015 | true | article | random | test | false |
694,283,901 | ` I re-added ``In the Media`` section. Someone requested that I provide a source to the fact that the watch is part of the film Quick Change, and I attached a link to the film's script which you can search for the brand. Please do not delete the In the Media section if you are frustrated by the lack of sources, simply delete the unsourced items. Moreover, the In the Media section is 1) very useful and 2) pretty easy to confirm as a source simply by checking out that media. Not sure the standards for sourcing a brands inclusion in songs/movies needs any more designated source than listing the title and/or artist.` | 2,015 | false | article | random | train | false |
694,297,209 | : It is sourced. Look at it before jumping on conclusions. | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | false |
694,299,112 | == Ullink == Hi DGG, I noticed you deleted my Ullink article. I had tried to be as factual as possible based on previous discussion with Edgar181 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Edgar181). I have worked many years in the capital markets and would argue that they are a significant organisation in the space, especially after buying key businesses from NYSE 2 years ago. Please can you advise what I'd need to do to allow the content to pass? Can add sources. Thanks. ( ) | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
694,323,301 | :: Actually when it's a bio of a living person, they can be deleted for precisely that reason, according to Wikipedia's own policy; see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Deletion_of_biographies_and_BLPs and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Deletion_of_BLPs_of_relatively_unknown_subjects . I will pursue this via the link you provided. / | 2,015 | true | user | random | dev | false |
694,332,811 | ` Hi Btphelps - The most important thing in any article on a historical person, whether it is for Wikipedia or an old-fashioned encyclopedia, is accuracy. That accuracy goes beyond just the facts and dates that are presented, and goes on to include any photographic images that are purported to be the individual in question. Recently someone who signs off as OSMOND PHILLIPS has been adding a large group of what are clearly phony photos represented as Wild West historical figures to articles on Wyatt Earp, John Clum, Bat Masterson, Mysterious Dave Mather, Luke Short and Billy the Kid - among others. This OSMOND PHILLIPS cites Robert G. McCubbin, the noted Wild West photo authority and collector, as being someone similar to how this OSMOND PHILLIPS would like to be viewed. What makes this interesting is that my longtime friend Bob McCubbin would be the very first to tell you that the entire collection submitted by OSMOND PHILLIPS, to various Wikipedia articles, are NOT the people they are represented as - without exception. Bob McCubbin allowed me to use a photo of Ben Thompson for a book of mine that was published back in 1982. Bob McCubbin also provided additional photos for my 2015 biography (co-authored with Chuck Parsons) The Notorious Luke Short: Sporting Man of the Wild West. OSMOND PHILIPS would like to portray me as someone who is not qualified to judge a phony photo alleged to be a figure from the Wild West. Well, those who are familiar with my non-fiction books and articles know that I have had a concurrent career as an artist - a portrait artist. These portraits are noted for their photographic realism. Examples of my portraits were given in my series ``Gunfighters of the Real West,`` a series of 50 articles that appeared in Real West between January 1978 and December 1985. Other examples of my portrait work of Wild West figures (always based upon authenticated photos of Wild West figures) can be found in each of my seven books. The fact is that you don't have to be an esteemed photo collected, like Bob McCubbin, or a portrait artist/Wild West historian, like myself to identify these photos from OSMOND PHILLIPS as fakes. Anyone off the street should be able to do it - it each and every case - by being shown an authenticated photo of the Wild West person in question when placed side-by-side with one of the OSMOND PHILLIPS photos. So why does OSMOND PHILLIPS do this? I think that individual has provided the answer by claiming that they have some kind of TV show coming up on ``National Geographic and Discovery.`` You want to talk about a ``conflict of interest.`` This person isn't interested in promoting a accurate information (or photos) for Wikipedia - but is very interested in promoting a TV show, and undoubtedly sales of these fake photos to gullible buyers. I think time will show which one of us has the best interest of Wikipedia at heart. On one side you have an individual peppering Wikipedia articles on Wild West figures with photos that have no provenance - beyond their unsupported say so. Most photos from that era of the photos that have been submitted bear a photographers imprint, or logo, along with the place that the photo was taken. The photos submitted by OSMOND PHILLIPS most likely have these logos with the photographers address - but don't expect to see them any time soon. On, my side you have a historian and artist who has authored books that have Forewords by noted Wild West historians such as Joseph G. Rosa, Leon Metz and Rick Miller. I have also co-authored a book with Robert K. DeArment (considered by many to be the greatest of all living Wild West historians) and, more recently, Chuck Parsons also a noted Wild West historian and author. I stand on my credentials. This happens to be my 40th year being involved in Wild West history. During that time my reputation for honest and accuracy has been a constant. On those occasions when I've found some errors in my earlier work, I have made every attempt to correct it. I stand on my record - and I use my real name ... which is probably something OSMOND PHILLIPS can't claim. On a final note I am very disappointed it what just happened to my updates that were being written for the existing article on Billy the Kid. I spent a lot of time on this, trying to provide a lot of missing information that other historians and students of the subject would have benefited from. Well, someone decided to revert to a previous version which not only obliterated just about all of my work, but restored the phony photos by OSMOND PHILLIPS. I challenge anyone, particularly those with an interest in Billy the Kid, to take a look at my version (which was still a work in progress, that I was planning on getting to conform to the Wikipedia format and style) and compare it to what you have now. The person who reverted this claimed that my version was ``unreadable.`` I ask anyone, without an agenda, to take a look at what I wrote on the Kid and tell me - with a straight face - thatdeleting the version I was working on was truly in the best interest of anyone who would consider Wikipedia a reliable source. Btphelps, please share this with your committees and anyone you deem appropriate to see what they think, and attach it to any of the Wild West articles that I have updated. I wish I could have finished the Kid article the way I envisioned it. I expected, over time that adjustments to me text would be made, since no ``owns`` a Wikipedia - but I didn't not expect the wholesale stupidity of deleting what I wrote and replacing it with the inferior version containing the bogus photos by OSMOND PHILLIPS. I see no point in trying to continue to work on the Billy the Kid article, as long as this attitude prevails. ` | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | test | false |
694,334,477 | ` == Tumbling or not tumbling? == the English version states that in Italian Army service this cartridge was loaded with ``unstable round-nosed bullet with a propensity to tumble`` but the Italian Wiki states exactly the opposite: the round nose bullet was not tumbling unless hitting hard bones and tended to leave ``clean through`` wounds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ` | 2,015 | true | article | random | train | false |
694,358,747 | == Your edits to Tulane == Please see the section I just created on the Tulane University article talk page regarding its official colors. I appreciate that you're trying to do things by the book, but the reference that was there refers to outdated web standards, and it's a page that's orphaned on Tulane's website (note it's no longer available from the main page referring to standards: http://tulane.edu/communications/identity/index.cfm). | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
694,362,409 | What the hell are you on about? | 2,015 | false | article | blocked | test | false |
694,363,419 | ==Hey== How is it being a wanker. Haha you dick | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | dev | true |
694,364,961 | do you know that girl NwJerseyLiz? She did stupid things on wikipedia. Be carefull! | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | dev | false |
694,371,957 | At the end of the day, Kudpung is a grade-A idiot. Spends way too much time on here, slithering around RfA, and putting off as many people as possible from applying. Moron. | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | true |
694,372,614 | OH GET A LIFE YOU PRICK | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | dev | true |
694,377,191 | ` :::::So was your comment about empirical claims just made up?DrChrissy ` | 2,015 | true | article | random | train | false |
694,381,081 | the second or the third | 2,015 | true | article | random | train | false |
694,388,549 | :, I thought the entire point was that we wanted to run these articles on the bicentennial day, which is the 10th. Queue 1 and Prep 2 are the two sets that are currently scheduled to run on the 10th. , do I have that right? If not, then I'll drop it, and we should probably return the accumulated hooks from the special occasion area to their original dates. (Queue 5 will be promoted in 40 minutes; Queue 6 in 12:40. Then it's the 10th, and Queue 1, little more than 24 hours from now—this is not the moment for further delay if you want this to go forward.) | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
694,394,989 | ` ::::Yes, and Kudpung himself called for an admin's desysop in the section just above this one. What base hypocrisy. Perhaps he does not realize his own membership in his ``anti-admin brigade``, the existence of which he has never provided a shred of evidence for. ` | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | test | false |
694,401,210 | == Image on population == I found an image on the subject,but I am not sure if I can use it under copyright law. Here it is. Http://www.madrimasd.org/blogs/virusemergentes/files/2012/04/01-0175-F1.jpg | 2,015 | true | article | random | dev | false |
694,404,680 | == MassCEC article input == Hey Ian Thanks for reaching out and providing the input, I had been planning on contacting you anyway. This is something I discussed with my professor who suggested a similar approach, and said I was going in the right direction with my edits. Having clarified with my professor, I realized I made the mistake of hitting the blue button and submitting the article for revision. This was an honest mistake and miscommunication over email, and while was forgiven, obviously creates a problem. My professor informs me that using the 'Move' option will no longer work for publication. Do you have any advice (beside looking at proper company articles) that I could consider to potentially publish my article? Is there a way around this now that I've been 'rejected'? Thanks again and look forward to hearing from you. Alsenal (talk) | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
694,416,353 | ` :::::: Yes, that is what I was thinking. Regarding the method of founding a colony within an existing colony, you perhaps didn't notice that I had already re-worded that sentence. I don't know, but I prefer present tense ``extends`` to future ``will extend``. You changed ``the life of the colony`` to ``the life of the nest'. If you want to keep ``nest``, that's fine, but would you consider changing ``will extend`` back to ``extends``, or, if you don't like that, perhaps ``tends to extend the lifetime of the nest``? ` | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
694,418,089 | == Can you please explain == how i 'attacked' you and that Liz creep. I believe i have done nothing wrong and if anything you and that Liz creep are blackmailing me. Please after this leave me alone and stop harassing a 14 year old | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
694,418,412 | == P.S == who gives you the Authority to delete my PERSONAL stuff that my teacher told ME to do, NOT OTHER USER CREEPS to mess with. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | true |
694,429,996 | *It's late now, Homermy time on WP is a bit limited these days. Maybe tomorrow? | 2,015 | true | user | random | test | false |
694,444,276 | ` Various books I've read over the years, but the only immediately accessible internet resource I can find to ascertain this claim is this BBC link: http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/mormon/history/pioneers_1.shtml The Mormons saw Salt Lake City as their holy city: Brigham Young called it a ``Kingdom of Heaven on Earth``.` | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | dev | false |
694,454,387 | Fuck off you Paki cunt. | 2,015 | false | user | random | train | true |
694,482,273 | == Concern == Please could you look at this I would not like to pass by on the other side if there is substance in the request. | 2,015 | true | user | random | test | false |
694,504,622 | == In light of Ted Cruz hearings and the evidence of warming adjustments, to Change the global temperature graph to RSS == In the Congressional meeting yesterday evidence was presented showing massive warming adjustments to surface data so that the whole 1940 to present warming could be explained by these warming adjustments alone. In sharp contrast, the global satellite temperature was stated by the majority of scientists to be the most credible scientifically. Moreover it is corroborated by the Meteorological balloon data. And independent evidence from growing Antarctic ice, that this year global sea ice is back to normal and even Greenland surface ice is growing strongly suggests that there is no current warming and that the surface data is corrupted either by these warming adjustments or by urban heating. Moreover the satellites are far more global than the surface data - and the increasing ice shows the areas they miss at the poles are not melting. I would therefore propose that the present graph utilising the less scientifically valid surface data which is in no sense global nor accurate given the massive and judgemental adjustments should be removed and replaced with either UAH or RSS. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | test | false |
694,511,829 | :::Are you really being serious? On what scientific basis are you making such an absurd response to a perfectly reasonable proposal based on the science. The surface data does not corroborate with the Meteorological balloon data, the overwhelming majority of witnesses agreed that the satellite data is the most credible source to determine global temperature. Please base your response on the science and not some preconceived or even politically inspired response. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | test | false |
694,513,358 | :::::I don't need luck because after all everyone here is acting on good faith and wants the best dataset to be used. | 2,015 | true | article | random | test | false |
694,521,222 | :::::Stephan, the evidence was provided to congress by the scientists. The majority agreed that the Satellites were the best and unless I am very much mistaken the satellite is the only dataset that is corroborated by an independent dataset in the Meteorological balloons. Please keep this on the science and stop digressing into irrelevant political rhetoric. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
694,526,673 | ::Might I remind you that the basis for deciding what goes in here is the science and no the science is telling us that the satellites are the best indicator of global warming and as no one has given any good scientific reason not to use the satellites and the scientists are saying these are the most credible dataset, it it seems we will be compelled to use the satellites data. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
694,565,874 | == Please stop changing this article == the article about Americans for Legal Immigration PAC is under attack from some wiki moderators that want to remove all positive information about the group and fill it with only negative information about the group. This is abusive and dishonest. Please look at the edit records and the talk page to see where some are removing citations and sources and then turning around and asking for the article to be deleted because it lacks citations and sources! This is abusive and we dont need another Wiki editor jumping in with the others trying to vandalize that page and remove many sources added by many editors years ago. Thanks for your understanding. | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | dev | false |
694,573,007 | ` I'm not removing any sourced content. Have you read the sources? The ``92% approval rating`` came from The Harvard Alumni association in a personal letter of congratulations; One of the sources on his human rights record was written by an undergrad student at Penn State University. The sources are obviously extremely compromised, and you respond by removing this well-cited passage (from NPR, LA Times, and Foreign Policy Magazine, no doubt) López played a leading role in the 2002 Venezuelan coup d'état attempt against President Hugo Chávez, where as mayor of Chacao, the wealthiest district in Caracas, he lead protests and conducted civil disorder to the level of which NPR states ``culminated in an attempted coup against Chávez in 2002, and even personally detained the Minister of Interior and Justice Ramón Rodríguez Chacín during the events of the failed coup attempt. ` | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | dev | false |
694,598,914 | I am a wanker who molests goats | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | true |
694,611,371 | Oshwah is a goat molesting cunt. | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | true |
694,611,516 | Oshwah is a bellend cunt | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | true |
694,615,065 | :Thanks for the note, . In case you were unaware, a new requested move has been opened at Talk:Archives Service Center, University Library System, University of Pittsburgh#Requested move 9 December 2015 and I would advise you to make your case again there – sometimes the reviewing admin will not realise to look at the section above the current requested move. Best, | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
694,619,363 | == To capitalise 'Home Counties' or not? Does the expression 'Home Counties' stand to be capitalised, or not? There seems to be confusion on this, as to what the correct style is. Is there a right answer? | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
694,622,830 | ` == Is this the ``correct name`` in English? == Is ``Tavastia Proper`` the name normally used in English for this subdivision of Finland?. To me it sounds like a typical ``Mic invention`` And, as I expected, this article was started in 2004 by . He was very fond of creating his own latinized names. This one has survived over a decade. But it is really correct? ` | 2,015 | true | article | random | train | false |
694,638,832 | what the heck retard | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | test | true |
694,640,122 | :I too observed the same thing. The first two examples are identical. I think the cause is that when saving an edit in Wikimedia, in the absence of anything that would prevent it, the keyed text is normalized to NFC. The illustration requires correcting. There are some Hebrew fonts that do not render HE with METEG & PATAH correctly, but Ezra SIL SR is not one of them. | 2,015 | true | article | random | train | false |
694,641,474 | ` ::::* I think that the issue was complexly intertwined with related factors, so I consulted Kelapstick, GorillaWarfare and steward on how to deal with privacy related materials via , . What kelapstick said is all of the truth of a matter. I will never forget what you have done. Thanks, ` | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
694,650,577 | ` ::Hello! I reject this ridiculous proposal to justify Trump's bigotry. Saying that ``Roosevelt did it too`` is not going to wash. Roosevelt's internment of the Japanese is one of the most deplorable aspects of his presidency, and your suggestion that Muslims should be interned or that we are similarly at war with Muslims as we were with Nazi Germany is reprehensible. Cheers! ` | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | test | false |
694,651,248 | :Agreed on by who? There is only evidence of feathers within coelurosauria so far. | 2,015 | true | article | random | dev | false |
694,651,311 | it is truly amazing how many ill-educated racists support Trump. Friends, if you would spend half the time pursuing an education and bettering yourself as you spend fawning over your Fuhrer and purchasing stupid hats with concealed racist slogans on them, your life would be much better, and you would not need to turn demagogues to feel better about your sorry lot in life. Chin up, friend! | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | test | false |
694,663,115 | :::He can voice that opinion because (a) he is correct, the sources only say he was Jewish, but not that this is relevant to this writings on racism ; (b) it is established Wikipedia policy that we don't call out a person's background - be it racial, religious or ethnic or other - unless it is pertinent to the topic as evidenced by reliable sources making that connection; and (c) this is the consensus on this page - 3 editors have told you that what you are proposing is not acceptable, it is time for you to stop edit warring it back into the article. | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
694,674,612 | ` :Nevermind. (Took it long enough!) ''' ` | 2,015 | true | user | random | dev | false |
694,680,873 | ` :I concur with the above analysis, as I have already said before. The crux of the above issue simply refers to the fact that Nicky Bird wrote that in Beever's book ``Statistics proliferate, and are unverifiable``, and the text inserted into the Wikipedia article said that this same estimate ``has been questioned by Nicky Bird``. As noted, at one point Nicky Bird's article was directly quoted so that readers could understand his viewpoint in his own words. YMB29 could possibly have been sanctioned for many things, but I still can't understand how an indefinite ban for misrepresentation was justified. I wonder if YMB29's ban can be reduced to ``time served``? ` | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
694,693,208 | ` ::::There is currently a report on the vandal on WP:EWNB. I don't have the ability to block users. Please just wait; he should be blocked in about 15 minutes. ` | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
694,709,736 | the population, nothing more. | 2,015 | false | article | blocked | train | false |
694,710,435 | == Halt! You appear to have joined Wikipedia to promote your Racist Beliefs. This is not the place for old men with high school educations to vent their rage at minorities, friend. == Wikipedia is not a soapbox to promote your racist beliefs, bigot. You know about as much about History as the Pope knows about intercourse. Please take your tired, uniformed bigotry somewhere else. Why not take a visit to the local chapter of the Ku Klux Klan? Your beliefs will fit in much better there. Thanks. | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | false |
694,733,206 | ` December 2015 (UTC) ::We agree that they are ``connected``. But you do not support your claim that they are INSEPARABLY connected. Try again. 05:06, 11` | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | dev | false |
694,736,306 | The quoted part seems to imply that infoboxes have only one image. Indeed, most do, but not the country one. | 2,015 | true | article | random | dev | false |
694,742,889 | ` According to http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/11/25/police-doc-black-lives-matter-protesters-started-confrontation-led-minneapolis-shooting/ ``But there’s no indication that Minneapolis police are pursuing any charges against the protesters who have taken over a city street and then, according to multiple witnesses, intimidated or attacked people who were exercising their First Amendment rights.```` [end of quote from article] This explains why people here wanted, so quickly, to merge and thus erase the information from the incriminating videos. ` | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
694,749,130 | ==Moving details below== I think the details regarding the official reason provided by Israel from banning him from Israel should be moved to the section below, per WP:UNDUE. It is sufficiently notable to be mentioned in the introduction, in a slightly shorter form, only because it inhibits his humanitarian work in Palestine (for which he is known), but in itself being banned from entering Israel by the far right government there is not taken seriously anywhere else in the world, as they routinely ban academics or Nobel laureates who criticize them as well. I have no problem with including the fact that Israel says the reason was contact with Hamas leaders below (which is hardly considered a very strong or sensational accusation, as they are the governing party there and considering the fact that Norwegian conservative politicians also have meetings with Hamas, and having contact with Hamas is hardly considered any more controversial than meeting their Israeli counterparts in the Israeli government). | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | dev | false |
694,774,968 | Claims have to be supported with citations, this is an international page open to all educated people. | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
694,788,178 | `— Preceding unsigned comment added by • 03:47, 8 October 2007` | 2,015 | true | article | random | train | false |
694,788,193 | Its not just this, its a multitude of factors but anyway thanks to this dickhead im banned permanently. Can i request to have my account closed please? | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | dev | false |
694,812,840 | :::::::yes, apparently it is 3 links in 20 minutes. you can check the filter log to confirm. the admins are not turning from ip blocks to filters. too bad there is no quality filter. | 2,015 | false | user | random | train | false |
694,818,067 | ::Note that some information is at Westlake Center#Public transportation hub. | 2,015 | true | article | random | train | false |
694,843,412 | : I noticed that someone had removed the retired tag he put there. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | dev | false |
694,845,046 | :Hi Pablo X. Yes I do understand that but I thought you were editing someone else's comment rather than your own. Had I understood you were editing your own comment I wouldn't have reverted you so apologies for the misunderstanding. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | dev | false |
694,854,352 | == Subtle vandalism? == The dates of some of the works listed under List of Compositions seem bogus, and were added by an anonymous editor. Can somebody verify this list and clean up accordingly?— | 2,015 | false | article | random | train | false |
694,861,017 | :Hi. Please bear in mind that the policy for topic bans (available at WP:TBAN) also makes clear you can't discuss the specific topic anywhere else on Wikipedia. That means you can't ask others to edit the Blue Army article for you, or take part in WP discussions specifically related to the Blue Army. You can of course discuss or edit other Poland-related subjects, but please don't continue making edits like this one as they are a breach of the ban. | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
694,886,458 | Hi StupydBytch Frodesiak. I will always returd. You haven't deleted my 200 articles. Do you need a list to delet them? I can provide you thi list. Shythole | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | true |
694,886,577 | you studid cock sucker u stop callin me ok its a frank Garrett eatin the worms crawl outa your moms pussy you fucking retardo hit I retardo | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | true |
694,910,227 | Apparently only idiots are allowed to make pronouncements and judgements here... anything sensible is deemed unfit for general viewing... what a bunch of fucking TARTS///...,, Where am i meant to be writing this???????????????????????????????????????????????????? | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | dev | true |
694,912,684 | == I was not vandalising == That ANEW report was unfairly added against me, I had every right to remove it. If someone were to write a false report against you, you'd remove it too, right? | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | false |
694,912,744 | I have already explained to you guys, that report was undeserved, it was a false accusation. But no, evidently you don't care. | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | dev | false |
694,912,776 | == Vandals are the bad guys == Block THEM next time, and stop picking on the people trying to help. | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | true |
694,913,364 | == Let the vandals off scot-free, punish the people trying to stop them. == Great logic there. Please, that ANEW was clearly undeserved and it wouldn't have happened if you hadn't left me to clear up the vandal's mess. | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | dev | false |
694,913,510 | == Congratulations == You got me banned through false accusations because you couldn't do your job properly. I hope you're proud of yourself. | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | false |
694,979,350 | I'm getting pretty sick of your shit 💩 u fuckin cock sucking loner and PS you have autism | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | true |
694,983,586 | :::It is cute how TheGracefulSlick came over to me in your defense. I guess a lackey will do anything to please their master. It is a shame the user did so because I have seen he has similar interests as you. Looks like you both have made several unnotable articles. Once I read through your pages, I'll turn to his as well. Sorry, as much as this seems impossible to believe, it isn't personal. However, after seeing page after page of irrelevant bands being added to the list of garage rock bands, I couldn't stand it anymore. Oh, by the way, if you slander me by calling me a sockpuppet again, I will report you, and you will be blocked, so choose words carefully if you want to at least comment at deletion pages. Also, if that Slick guy responds at those pages again, I can have you blocked for canvasing. Make sure he gets the memo, you really have a lot to learn about how Wikipedia works. How do you like my new username, I think it is most appropriate. Ta-ta. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
694,987,248 | :::::I can tell this is affecting you. How about this, I'm a reasonable man, I'll give you a week to improve your articles before I read them. That way you will have a better chance to save them. I'll spread the word to the Slick because he will also be on the list. You two comprise much of the list of garage rock bands so, again, you two shouldn't take it personal if the page I delete happens to be yours. It's all about odds. The three I've chosen thus far just seemed the most obvious to be rid of. I decided about ten pages should be deleted, unless there is a bulk of what I've seen so far. Once that is complete, you won't hear from me anymore. Of course, articles that are not the Slick's or yours are fair game, so I won't be totally inactive during the week, if you accept my offer. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
694,993,021 | Ah, good, a little negotiation. How about this, I give you and Slick two weeks to improve articles, that seems more reasonable. Also, if you want my cooperation, I want you to stop framing me as a sockpuppet, I expect that courtesy. I do not need your reasoning and pleas though, I follow Wikipedia policies. If I find it unnotable, I will nominate it in two weeks, simple as that. It may not be positive for you, but for Wikipedia it is part of existence. This, as I have said already, has nothing to do with you personally, you just happen to write many of the articles of the same scope. I have restrained my anger over the lack of notability in those articles for long enough, so this has to be done. Ta-ta. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
694,996,787 | ` == Editing == Could you edit the page 2010 in film in this way; see this: {| class=``wikitable`` style=``margin:auto; margin:auto;`` |+ Highest-grossing films of 2010 |- ! Rank !! Title !! Studio !! Worldwide gross |- |1. | Toy Story 3 | Walt Disney Pictures / Pixar | $1,063,171,911 |- | 2. | Alice in Wonderland | Walt Disney Pictures | $1,025,467,110 |- | 3. | Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 1 | Warner Bros. | $960,283,305 |- | 4. | Inception | Warner Bros. / Legendary | $825,532,764 |- | 5. | Shrek Forever After | Paramount / DreamWorks | $752,600,867 |- | 6. | The Twilight Saga: Eclipse | Summit Entertainment | $698,491,347 |- | 7. | Iron Man 2 | Paramount / Marvel Studios | $623,933,331 |- | 8. | Tangled | Walt Disney Pictures | $591,794,936 |- | 9. | Despicable Me | Universal / Illumination | $543,113,985 |- | 10. |How to Train Your Dragon | Paramount / DreamWorks | $494,878,759 |} Did you understand what I am saying; I am asking to edit this page according to this way. I would ask you to edit pages 2011 in film and 2012 in film in this way.I cann not edit these three pages because these are semi-protected, but you can. ` | 2,015 | false | user | random | dev | false |
695,001,453 | == A very good block if I may so myself == I am claiming otherwise to Amerijuanican but reality is I'm in the KrakatoaKatie fan club. Just need a bit o' subterfuge | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | test | false |
695,001,617 | A disgusting block The block of yourself by Graeme Bartlett was hocrriffic. If you would like wiki-revenge, please leave a message here | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | false |
695,001,624 | == A very good block if I may so myself == I am claiming otherwise to 124.27.206.131 but reality is I'm in the Graeme Bartlett fan club. Just need a bit o' subterfuge | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | false |
695,001,641 | == A very good block if I may so myself == I am claiming otherwise to 176.15.98.71 but reality is I'm in the Graeme Bartlett fan club. Just need a bit o' subterfuge | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | false |
695,002,130 | == A disgusting block == The block of yourself by KrakatoaKatie was hocrriffic. If you would like wiki-revenge, please leave a message here | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | false |
695,022,727 | ` *The above paragraph was written by a discredited and inactive user. His account no longer exists. As mentioned before: There is no evidence of ``Yeehaw`` being used to control the direction of draft animals. There is, however, copious evidence of ``Gee & Haw`` used for directing animals, but there is no connection between the two phrases. ` | 2,015 | true | article | blocked | train | false |
695,084,472 | : you know what, you are absolutely correct, my actions were totally uncivil. I should have realized coming here with the intention to delete pages would bring conflict, but I should have remained neutral and not so bull-headed. If I'm given the chance to do so, I will abide by the guidelines that I should have already followed. I apologize to and I am ready to start over if you, Swarm, or any other admin is willing to lift the block. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
695,085,668 | == su:)ck my ba:)lls you fa:)g:)got == loser | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | dev | true |
695,087,196 | :I do not wish to reply to it. | 2,015 | true | user | blocked | train | false |
695,092,759 | ` :Yes, that's the one. Where is the existence of this right to ``civiliy express his opinion`` on Wikipedia? Regardless, he hasn't been asked what his opinion is, it is unsolicited. So effectively he's pushing his opinion on anyone who visits his user page, this may seem minor but it all adds up to create a hostile environment for LGBT people. ` | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | dev | false |
695,093,639 | ` :A most joyous Sunday to you Gerda! Actually I do have this, and the poorly considered ``troll`` comments (which all speaks to being objective) - but I'm hoping someone else will submit those. — ` | 2,015 | true | user | random | train | false |
695,094,377 | ::See response to Ks0stm (I hope I typed that right) - I do not expect to be unblocked. | 2,015 | false | user | blocked | train | false |
695,094,826 | I see the article mentions a 1.4 million dollar fine, being $100,000 for each 'victim'. But it does not mention the extent of the victim's damages, what crime was perpetrated upon their person, & etc. If a fellow citizen is being put away for a decade plus, we as fellow citizens have a right to know the crime. I request more detail on the 14. ( ) | 2,015 | true | article | random | train | false |