text
stringlengths
0
23.7k
label
stringclasses
4 values
dataType
stringclasses
2 values
communityName
stringclasses
4 values
datetime
stringclasses
95 values
It would be funny if it wasn’t so sad. They literally can’t see their own hypocrisy.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
I know you are but what am I 😂
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
A bit flustered I think. You just replied to someone about some gentle ribbing, but you replied to the wrong person! They were just pointing out how silly you are being with your accusations while conveniently ignoring your own hypocrisy. Oh dear!
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
I think you replied to the wrong person… Ooopsie!
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Bro just looking at his comments he's either trolling you or talking at a brick wall
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
What if deepfake news... is deepfaked?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Mist Republicans hate Taylor Swift seem like just a ploy to get libs riled up. She has openly been a Biden supporter.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2016/04/26/a-wider-ideological-gap-between-more-and-less-educated-adults/ This shows exactly that more intelligent people are left leaning.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Taylor swift has the money to fight this and I hope she does. It’s disgusting.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
No, when did I say that? I don't support trump.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Twitter has tons of these. Nobody actually believes them. I see tons of fake images of various celebs wearing shirts for various politicians based on what they think the audience of the thread will want or buy..Nobody believes the celebs are involved. The fakes are stupid, but they aren't a threat
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
I personally know a group of about 12 Trump supporters that are aged 35-40 that went to her past tour. They love Swift.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
My point is the person I’m replying to who is implying that someone could have been a minor when they first heard Taylor swift and is now still listening to her in their 40s is literally impossible. You could not be in your 40s and have listened to Taylor swift while being a minor haha, argue til the end of the earth of you want
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
Ah, it’s the “as adults” part that you’re hung up on. I’ve never understand the impulse to argue about absolutely nothing like this. You must know that the phrase was an offhand choice of words, and since the commenter said “20s to 40s”, it actually does in fact apply to lots of people in that age range. Who tf cares, though, lol, what a dumb thing to argue about. Your original point that it’s pathetic to go to a Taylor Swift concert in your 40s is also super weird. Are you a misogynist? Is that why you think ppl paying to see her is pathetic? Is it because she’s younger than 40s? Do you think it’s pathetic to be a fan of someone younger than you? Or is it that you don’t like her music and thus you think anyone who does like it is pathetic?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
I think it can advance a third party a little bit
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-06-06
Not until we reform the system. In Australia it can. Here, it’s shooting your dick off. Campaign for a third party. Educate people about them. Talk about the issues. Talk about electoral reform. But DO NOT waste your vote.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-07-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-04-06
Meta is ramping up their production of small robots for Christmas Season.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Every post is a psypost article now. They boast: "Ad Fonte Media, a platform that evaluates the quality of media sources, awarded PsyPost a commendable score of 43 out of 64 for reliability. This score indicates thorough fact reporting, highlighting PsyPost’s commitment to delivering accurate information to its audience." 67% is a failing score.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-04-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-04-06
Software update for non safety issue is just that a software update and is optional. If it is a software update for a safety issue it is a different matter. It is less optional. It also has a tracking component required and you have to notify people who don't get the update. It is the media and heavily Tesla that turned recall in to a dirty word. On anything as complex as a car their always have been recalls. Tesla is also known to play fast and loose in software update having safety issue in the update.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Bad analogy with the Note 7. Try again.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
If a car fails a safety standard and requires modification, be it physical or software, it should be called a recall. While that modification can be done remotely OTA, the biggest concern is that safety issues get minimized and we squabble over definitions. What’s the worst that happens by calling it a recall? Some nerds bitch? That’s it. What happens if it’s not called a recall? Companies feel less incentivized to move quickly and issues that fail safety standards persist over a longer period of time that may result in unneeded deaths. How about Tesla just focuses on improving hardware and software quality and we stop trying to minimize failures because we have a vested interest in a company.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
I’m a mechanic, I hate the cars.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
I am making this argument on behalf of all EVs, not just Tesla.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
recall /rĭ-kôl′/ transitive verb To ask or order to return.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
And ignored if you are Toyota, who is full stopping 3 models because of safety issues.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
And ignored if you are Toyota, who is full stopping 3 models because of safety issues.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Luckily whatever definition you decided to look at is completely irrelevant to this case.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
EVs are not the only cars with recalls that require no dealer trips. If you want more buy in, don’t make this complaint exclusive to Tesla or even EVs as it will immediately get dismissed as protectionism. There have been prior recalls that didn’t require a trip that were not OTA updates. There have also been other cars, no even EVs that have had recalls that only required an OTA update. Tesla, and/or EVs are not being treated differently here or unfairly. And I find nothing wrong with calling a recall a recall even if no intervention is required. It’s really freaking easy to be informed. NHTSA even has an app for it that can track your specific VIN and send a push when a recall has been filed. Don’t make this more difficult by trying to add more layers when it’s not needed.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
No, because that information is part of the recall notice. You just read the recall and then you know. You can read, right?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-06-06
If it’s a legally mandated safety feature, it’s a legally mandated safety feature. I’m sorry words means stuff and that’s distressing for you, but this isn’t hating. This is an adult calmly explaining to you why insisting that we redefine recalls to make one car company look better is a silly thing to do.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-06-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-04-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-04-06
Idk when I used TikTok I curated my feed pretty solidly and would see the reputable news outlets I wanted to see daily. In the early days of TikTok there were a lot of creators making content showing folks how to use the platform functionality to curate, and I wonder if those creators are buried? Or if folks simply curate themselves into their silos? Anyway, I found that very helpful.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
I’m sticking a knife in a toaster levels of shocked
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
The algorithm shows you what you want to be shown. This goes for all social media platforms. My TikTok is just meme cat videos and anime because that’s what I watch. You go looking for political stuff and you engage with misleading election news you will be shown misleading election news 🫢
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
The algorithm needs to get to know your likes. Scroll through the obnoxious videos quickly and you'll be served less of those. Watch it, like, comment, save or share and you'll get more. Searching helps tailor your FYP also. Search your interests and those also will appear more. Watching lives will give you much more Live content in your FYP also. If you want to see someone's content more, visit their profile and watch at least two videos. They'll appear more often in your FYP and no need to follow them and get overloaded with their content in your "Following" tab. It's not perfect, but after a bit of use, you'll see the positive change and less annoying clutter in your FYP (For You Page). I tend to focus on bottom left of app because it shows "Sponsored" or "AI generated" or "Promotional" so you can scroll through the cheesy influencers selling junk and the corporation ads easily. Good luck!
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
I can. Most adults can too. Shitty, low value discount brands like McDonalds, Nike, Caddilac, and Gucci can't because they don't produce anything of value and have no inherent user base outside of media acknowledgement. Most voters do as well, because most voters don't enjoy being forced to endure russian propaganda or literal murder videos. That's Tik-Tok to most Americans: Russians saying how much they Hate America, Americans being shot to death and victims saying how much they Hate America, and whining about Homeless People while also saying they Hate America. Tik-Tok Hates America, based on their algorithms and content.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
..but they still feed you paid videos such as Russian propaganda. I've noticed this on my phone regardless of what region I set it to and what location I manually set it in to use, it always gives me Russian State videos, Police Shooting videos, Gay Hate videos, and other right wing garbage that is obviously paying Tik-Tok to shove it in my face. I only follow accredited news sources on TT but still get flat earth videos. This demonstrates just how shitty TT is, and how they are no different than Facebook.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-04-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-04-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-04-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-04-06
Thank you for your impassioned post but  li was asking about the *HoloLens* not the Quest. I own a quest too and it’s a completely different device to HoloLens. 
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Another case of massive investment with undefined use cases. Honestly the only thing I've found that VR or MR massively improved is DCS.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-04-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-04-06
I mean, regardless of the video's veracity, if anything in Ukraine is a "legitimate target", then so is anything in Russia. That's how it works when you're at war. The world needs to stop making Ulraine fight with one hand tied behind their collective back. Russia has no such restrictions, and has been more than willing to strike at civilians. Ukraine should be able to hit them back, it's only fair.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
here we go folks
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
It was cut, not faked.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-04-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-04-06
>The US could make assurances that it would defend Taiwan if it gave up that shield, but it is easy to see why they would not take that gamble. just look at ukraine if you wanna see what broken promises in exchange for a shield can do
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-04-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-04-06
I downloaded an extension to get rid of it the first time I saw that "overview". I sing and play traditional music. Google is normally very helpful for sourcing. I had been trying to Google around for a folksong from the 17th century, so I googled one of the lines from the chorus+"song". That AI overview generated some bullshit "song lyrics" based on what I had searched that was absolutely not related to the real thing. Worse than useless. Literal garbage I have to sift through to get to what I want, and there's no way to turn it off besides an extension.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
r/technology
post
r/technology
2024-04-06
Holy hyperbole, batman.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Step one, get them addicted to solar power. Step two, scorch the sky. Step three learn kung fu!
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Lets just advance AI rapidly, pumping gigawatts if power into ai learning centres. in 20 years we can ask it to solve our climate crisis. We have tried nothing apart from blaming the average citizen of their own carbon foot print while celebrities take private jets for ice cream, rolling back or gutting sustainablity targets, building new fossel fuel usuing plants. The AI will call us all dumb and enslave us to be batteries. Once Im in the martix set in the 90s I might be able to afford my own home. Sounds awesome. I for one cannot wait for our AI overlords to take charge.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Oh they just don’t care about the climate and claim AI WONT take away jobs. Though it already is
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
And as the quote going around goes (paraphrased, not quoted): "Why cant AI do dishes and laundry so I have to make poetry and art, instead of AI making poetry and art so I have time for dishes and laundry?" Seriously, everything around consumer-level generative AI is absolute unnecessary bullshit.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
I feel like we’re just in a big game of civilization right now and we need to upgrade our power plants in order to accommodate this new technological advancement
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
1.21 GWatts is the limit!
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Tell that the the billions raised out of poverty world wide. Your view is very privileged. World poverty has dropped by 50% since 1990 and the rate of poverty decline is accelerating.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Literally everyone is talking about these issues in this sub, across any sub remotely related to AI, and pretty much daily across just about every reputable news organization. But comments with hyperbole do better so I guess it's fine.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Having to explain to my clients that AI won’t magically run your whole office and pour your coffee is so painful as well. I’m about to watch a small-ish business waste $25k/year on a glorified chatbot rather than investing in their people.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
AI output: eliminate human electricity use, therefore reducing need for electricity, and reducing green house gas emissions. Commencing development of bio weapon and subsequent dispersion to the atmosphere.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Because we don’t have AI we have advanced chat bots.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Its interesting to see how the cause of global warming is shifting from oil companies to now AI companies. I've dabbled in deep learning some time ago (before GenAI took off) and even then the writing on the wall was that GPUs are going to keep getting more power hungry as dataset size increases. (yes yes, there are lite versions of models as well which can be developed and deployed, however after transformers + autoencoders + GANs +GPTs energy consumption have skyrocketed)
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
The US is also putting money into nuclear research and expansion, but like you said, realistically it takes much longer to get new plants up and running than it takes to install roof mounted or large array photovoltaics. The good news is that solar and wind have become exponentially more efficient and durable, and we’re also working on large scale energy storage with mixed grids to deal with intermittency. Also [solar panels can be recycled and are often made from recycled materials now.](https://www.epa.gov/hw/solar-panel-recycling) They’re also working on the same thing for [old turbines.](https://www.nationalgrid.com/stories/energy-explained/can-wind-turbine-blades-be-recycled)
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Are you talking about the US? I’m assuming no, but there are some wild misconceptions about our solar expansion so just checking. The good news is that farms generally don’t use arable land to transition to solar power unless they’re building an agrivoltaics system. I don’t think I’ve seen a single farm in my state have to trade arable land for panels despite a lot of ruckus about that. They’re all either roof mounted or on otherwise unusable land, which makes sense. Farmers aren’t going to cheat themselves out of profits.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
The carbon footprint really depends on how that power is generated.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
With you in spirit, but we are doing a hell of a lot globally to expand renewable energy. It’s growing at an exponential rate, far faster than anyone expected.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Beam itself to another planet and laugh at us from the stars tbh
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
And we find AIs achilles heel in all it's horrifying glory
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Thats not fair. Its also used by terrorist regimes and drug cartels too.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
It solves sudokus. Thats it.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
I mean we already have machines pouring out coffee
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Why?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
And who do you expect to talk about this and educate the public? 😂
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Ong if I have to hear another business owner tell me how they’re sinking $40k into a “revolutionary AI” that’s going to totally change the game, when in reality they’re just avoiding hiring a fucking receptionist…
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
VR set in the peak of humanity, 1999.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
More like “do the corporations running these data centers care enough about energy use to give a shit about the damage or will they only prioritize profits?” Because we see how Google handles water scarcity around their data centers (buying off local politicians) so I’m not so sure about having faith in them making reasonable choices
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
It’s going to come from nuclear power. Tech companies now have an incentive to make power (nuclear and fusion) and improve the grid. There is no downside to the infrastructure problem.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
People are talking about it. Climate folks I know are projecting AI centric data centers to add up to 5% of global energy consumption in the near to medium term future. They’re talking everything from SMR to outlandish stuff to meet the demand.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
I would say this is the same as opposing industrialization, but in an interesting and positive way. People's complaints about industrialization were extremely valid. Their work took a turn for the worse. Work required less specialization due to tool improvements, which allowed workers to be replaced easily. This meant managers/owners could make working conditions pitiful, in the full sense of the word. 10's of thousands of people died/got maimed due to this, and it wouldn't have had reason to change if people didn't fight for their rights. On top of all that, scientists in the very late 1800's pointed out the mechanism and connection to industrialization that has led to the current climate crisis. I don't dislike AI (both the current iteration that we call AI and the lofty end goal). I currently work in machine learning. I think peoples anti AI sentiment falls closely in line with the above. As we move forward, we need to be careful about the livelihoods of workers, so that we don't create worse conditions that real people will have to fight their way out of (like in the past). Obviously, we need to avoid roasting humanity alive. This current opposition is good.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Yes that’s what we’re worried about. You nailed it
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
I worked for a massive global company. Management could not be more excited about AI. These boomers who haven’t done any real work in decades and just read emails and attend meetings think this shit will actually replace the majority of their work force. You guys have no idea how bad it is. Most corporations that are easily 50% staffed with fake work will have a field day with AI.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
......um, technological advancement. not everything is a conspiracy and no its not a coincidence, this is how science and tech works
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
You are ignoring the struggles people went through to make sure that those technological improvements actually translated to better livelihoods. I already sent this to someone down thread: I would say this *is* the same as opposing industrialization, but in an interesting and positive way. People's complaints about industrialization were extremely valid. Their work took a turn for the worse. Work required less specialization due to tool improvements, which allowed workers to be replaced easily. This meant managers/owners could make working conditions pitiful, in the full sense of the word. 10's of thousands of people died/got maimed due to this, and it wouldn't have had reason to change if people didn't fight for their rights. On top of all that, scientists in the very late 1800's pointed out the mechanism and connection to industrialization that has led to the current climate crisis. I don't dislike AI (both the current iteration that we call AI and the lofty end goal). I currently work in machine learning. I think peoples anti AI sentiment falls closely in line with the above. As we move forward, we need to be careful about the livelihoods of workers, so that we don't create worse conditions that real people will have to fight their way out of (like in the past). And obviously, we need to avoid roasting humanity alive. **This current opposition is good.**
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
All the data available has been processed? You act like the amount of data is static, when people are feeding an exponentially growing amount of data into these things every single day. They’re not going to stop improving.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
There’s no going back to Eden
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
The thirst for more and more power is actually a sign of our progress as a civilization. Unfortunately at our current stage of technology, that's mostly going to come from fossil fuels. We need nuclear energy NOW.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
If your job as a white collar worker is just looking at Excel spreadsheets and sending emails all day, why wouldn't you want that to be replaced? You act like everyone working a monotonous job for a corporation loves their job when that couldn't be further from the truth. Why else would the majority of people want to "work from home"? Cuz working from home means they can escape the monotony of corporate life.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Oh weird. People in Africa aren't experiencing any snow so it must not be real.      Maybe instead you're just not the center of the universe. And this is causing you delusions & ignorance that you might otherwise avoid.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
Author is ignoring the fact that while the power consumption IS higher in absolute terms, the energy efficiency of the computers is higher. It’s not like they’re doubling the power for the same amount of compute. A lot of the same doom and gloom as been going on for a while be it robotics replacing human laborers and what not - yet we are still here. Virtually all problems need to solve require computation to solve it, and burying our heads in the sand and stopping progress is not helpful or useful. It’s quite easy to be a naysayer - if your predictions are wrong, no one is mad and rarely will people bring it up. If you’re right then you rub it in everyone’s face forever. If you want a technology (like AI) to be used responsibly, it’s much more helpful to be the one developing it and steward it into a beneficial use case in our society.
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-04-06
All that anti nuclear stance have come to bite huh?
r/technology
comment
r/technology
2024-05-06