Datasets:

affahrizain

/

jigsaw-toxic-comment

like 1

i did click on the gizmo and huggle bless its heart encountered an error and had to close i am finding a lot of this admin stuff is covered kinda sketchily in the guidelines and some of it seems to be word of mouth sorta like all snakes being notable i will edit the instructions when i learn things so future new admins will have an easier time talk

oh and by the way i find it a bit odd complaining to admins about being flamed for making completely retarded edits especially when you are working with articles about hooligan firms

27 january 2011 utc personal views about the use of this site on articles aside unless you can find a source that discusses the sites usage the ongoing debates of it then we do not need to discuss it in the article i do agree that this article needs some work in sourcing and prose but we need to focus the discussion back to the el discussion and not here 21 48

thanks for experimenting with wikipedia your test worked and has now been reverted or removed please use wikipedia sandbox for any other tests you want to do since testing in articles will be reverted quickly please see the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia thanks 17 01 18 apr 2005 utc

lhc spam hi mark on what basis do you claim that an article informative written by the head of the lhc project in the magazine of the royal academy of engineering was spam of any kind

picture at top of article is this really the best we can do a random statue how does that picture even convey the meaning of rape they could be dancing for all i know

removal of v1 references in this edit i removed two references for the following reasons more to follow in a moment

would you say this article is middle or high on the importance scale

you might just be right initially i assumed good faith as per wp agf but now it seems its getting out of hand i am not an admin either but i intend to create a ruckus in a while if this character is not blocked for disruptive editing if indeed its similar to the nature magazine incident then its alarming please post this on wp ani and raise concerns with whichever admins you feel could help i will do the same we need to stop the rumours being spread best regards

thanks for your message i have already spent far too much time on the issue so that i shall not take any further action j milburn argument is faulty one cannot remove an image on the possibility of the events that may or may not take place in the future the relevant question is whether my copyright statement is incorrect at the time being and the answer to this is clearly in the negative at least milburn has not come up with a free image of michael foot thereby showing that my copyright statement were invalid so that the image must stay i have argued but to no avail that when a free image turns up there is no a priori reason why a free image should at all become available at any foreseeable time from now that event renders my present copyright statement invalid at which instance the present image must be replaced by the available free image at present no law is violated so that there is no reason why the image should be removed but i have said this many times and unless

yes listen to himmler there that will steer you rightly

i hear this very commonly in melbourne usually meaning no the yeah is comparable to an ummm

challenge accepted

your message first off i stand corrected on the copyright for the mcaullife article i am new to wiki and did not see that the refs that were coming from framinghamcom had been copied from nasa on your second note regarding legal threats you were off base a bit i was not threatening anything i was implying that if this was a blatant copyright violation that someone else might be upset if that was not clear i apologize i was just on the lookout for bad articles

you read it your note addressed something else incidentally your reasoning above is unsound whether or not my rushdie comparison holds up it does not fail to hold up because his literary career is not a failure but i hope you understand i am not trying to get any decision reversed and never was rather i am yelling at you for enforcing a stupid policy

mfd nomination of user ryeinn your opinions on the matter are welcome please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at wikipedia miscellany for deletion user ryeinn and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes you are free to edit the content of my talk

welcome hello morethanape and welcome to wikipedia thank you for your contributions i hope you like the place and decide to stay here are some pages that you might find helpful the five pillars of wikipedia tutorial how to edit a page and how to develop articles how to create your first article using the article wizard if you wish manual of style i hope you enjoy editing here and being a wikipedian please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes this will automatically insert your username and the date if you need help check out wikipedia questions ask me on my talk page or ask your question on this page and then place helpme before the question again welcome

please stop if you continue to blank pages you will be blocked from editing wikipedia feeling chatty edits

you deserve an apology well yamla and others i am sorry for my disruptiveness although i still think i changed the redhead pic with good reason now i intend to use wikipedia properly knowing this will you give me a break every 5 minutes i seem to get picked on here remember what i said please so as i said i will make good changes here from here on

january 2008 utc unlike other schools the mshs can be released free from the school computer it section which means it is under public domain 01 39 19

cia reliable source the cia factbook is not a reliable source apart from the fact that the article now uses the cia factbook for the vast majority of sources most of the figures published in the factbook could easily have been plucked out of thin air they have no source for example a figure of 90 of norwegians being christian is clearly ridiculous and is widely inaccurate in that case the eurobarometer figure is much more sensible in terms of real world number let not forget that that the cia is the usa central intelligence agency it is a politically biased body we we say figures from for example the russian intelligence agency iranian intelligence agency chinese intelligence agency as being reliable no so why the american intelligence agency in fact pretty much every references in this article is now the us cia factbook or the us department of state wikipedia is never going to be taken seriously with this kind of bias this is simply unencyclopedic

why i do not understand the this article is no good banner or the low importance tag perhaps it was written by someone close to the company but it does not grovel at the feet of haas automation the statements are accurate not overly adulatory not full of marketing hyperbole in a word realistic what do you want a statement by their competitors that they are worthless buffoons as far as low importance well they may not be the largest machine tool builder in the world but they are certainly in the top few they are definitely the largest machine tool builder in the united states if that is not important but articles about some garage band that played a cover of lemon tree very pretty at mitzi fifth birthday party merit in depth coverage well what can i say they make machines they make their own controls they have a decent reputation and a large market share and this article is unbiased i do not see the problem i am not connected to haas by the way

can you unblock this ip it is a shared ip and the block is affecting innocent users

the ma part of your name is apropos thanks for the scolding i am very very chagrined and will never ever disappoint you again 39

note that the article salonius of embrun refers to a council of lyon c 567 suggesting that there were more than these two if someone could figure out how to resolve this apparent discrepancy between the two articles it would be much appreciated

you filthy stinking crow i am back dirty crow you better delete or if not support the deletion of all photos of human private parts you feces gorging filthy mongrel are you a hog you want to lick anuses overflowing with feces dirty hog

wohoo welcome back when that rfa coming i would like to welcome it too regards nd

hurt christina aguilera song you restored chart trajectories and unofficial charts here to the article in question but these are generally frowned upon because they are difficult to verify after the song is no longer popular and violates what wikipedia is not please do not airplay charts and community central statistics since they do not compile the entire country audience impressions for a detailed discussion regarding these matters please see wikipedia talk wikiproject music tables for charts thank you

now you fucking pathetic moron cc jimbo wales rootmyass

but all the article said in my version was that jonah goldberg thinks i did not present it as fact nor is it his book was reviewed and presumably you can find someone who says that goldberg is wrong and what exactly is wrong with the hamby quote

yes someone can

bigger than biggest ever etc this is not about who is bigger than this is about the municipality not about the metro area that is another topic not about the province that is another article not about greece that is another article not about the eu that is another article we would like to concern ourselves to thessaloniki city only if you would prefer to maintain the higher level articles on the metro area i am sure the editors would welcome you there we are not trying to compete with them nor duplicate what justly belongs in their article and justly does not belong here

oh dear oh dear how fukin sad i will regret this for the rest of my life

whats with ur name persian poet gal so random

cricket in australia hi cricket in australia is the new australian collaboration please help to improve it in any way you can talk

possibly unfree image chowbluetongueukapalajpg an image that you uploaded or altered image chowbluetongueukapalajpg has been listed at wikipedia possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed if the image copyright status cannot be verified it may be deleted please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted thank you talk talk possibly unfree image brittanyspanielmrwilljpg an image that you uploaded or altered image brittanyspanielmrwilljpg has been listed at wikipedia possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed if the image copyright status cannot be verified it may be deleted please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted thank you talk talk

4 motivated selling coupled with reluctant buying cause a slide until the markets have assmimilated the information and prospective buyers have reset their bid price and converted other assets to cash sufficient to buy up the surplus from motivated sellers

but that is the point it is not me i have been reverting the edits of that sockpuppet i have reverted several of his reverts back to the original the ip addesses and its variations ip range belong to someone at agiscom in washington dc meanwhile i am based in new jersey it looks like i am made the scapegoat and being a legitimate long time user am punished whilst the real offender sockpuppet is being let go free to continue his or her activities please take another look and compare i am different persona i reverted the edits of ip range and other unidentified ip vandals thank you

legit question and how is it that you can ban someone by ip address does this not then prohibit free access to wiki due to public work computers that share internet access

ahh the little sister rises to protect big brother is not this cute my argument was against redfarmer not you kww so please stay out of this and read the things i posted to redfarmer about it i am sick of whenever i go on a wiki people dispise me i do not try to be cruel but people push me there so kww your last warning is noted but i take my last warning from the one i have a problem with not his mother thank you leonhart178

tom terry dont tell me what to do i dont care if you block me from editing you are not the boss of me

this again shows that user charles is stalking me he keeps this user page in watchlist and appears here less than two hours after i posted my complaint if i had been stalking charles in the start of this i would have seen that he had approached keilana with an accusation against me and i would have had some possibility to answer before that questionable blocking made by keilana however i do not stalk user charles contrary to what he is doing i have been reading several times about white rajahs of sarawak there is my edit in discussion about another white rajah before user charles appeared to that page generally i have some same interest fields which is why i occasionally edit same articles and participate same discussions however in this thing keilana very unbecomingly to anything which is needed to be impartial seems to have chosen her party and surely user charles appears soon to stalk me and stalk my comments

that information can be found merged to both groups articles it a zero

police officers charged criminally in canada has now been listed for deletion

can you give an example of the image where the template was not recognized talk

i did not tag it but i agree with the tag the article is very unbalanced almost every paragraph is written from the perspective of his critics there are plenty of comments here explaining the unfairness of the criticism

hello which opinions were those you mean re abortion they have been deleted off your page so i do not know what they were if you could just refresh my memory ps you missed the d in entitled

from virginia statehouse to gettysburg scapegoat

may 2014 utc strong oppose merge this article has more than enough sufficient sourcing more than the others recently determined to not meet the gng an article poor quality has zero bearing on whether its subject is notable talk contribs 02 43 22

interestingly we disagree on the part of your assessment of lovemonkey that starts with on the other hand curiously i would generally apply that assessment much more to esoglou than to lovemonkey you have probably missed this but neither phatius nor i have asserted esoglou is innocent of the charges i have not looked at your edits in close detail but what i have seen does look troubling and worth a closer look i expect phatius has looked more closely and he seems to think there are some issues with esoglou conduct it almost as if we have jumped past the trial and moved to the sentencing phase where phatius and i are pleading leniency on the basis of redeeming qualities and extenuating circumstances as for the focus on lovemonkey and i know you disagree with my view on this my attitude is that if wikipedia can put up with lovemonkey it can put up with ten esoglous

rip requiescat in pace

okay sorry for the delay was caught up in some other things but have now deleted the page you created by accident i note that you have created a correct sockpuppet page here please let me know if i can help in any other way talk

9 may 2009 utc it would be easiest if you were to admit to being a member of the involved portuguese lodge and then there would be no requirement to acknowledge whether you had a previous account carlos botelho did not have a good record or not and i would then remove the sockpuppet template as irrelevant wp coi permits people to edit those articles such as msjapan does but just means you have to be more careful in ensuring that references back your edits and that npov is upheld 20 29

voice acting changes er shold not someone post something about dora voice changing in maturance seriously people it may sound like just my opinion but this girl is really starting to sound riiculous with her new vice especially since she always exlaiming stuff no as a matter of fact that what she does to try and hide it by pitching her voice to it highest someone really needs to mention this painfully obvious fact

nuff said i have just discovered this rather nice and maybe in some poncey boutique beer bottleshop nearby talk contribs

get lost get lost steve and take your purile troublemaking comments on my talk page with you buzz off

interupting but that fact that i advised ottava through diffs that he needs to back off whilst openly admitting i have no time for you either wmc would seem to put me at the very centre of neutral also as i am an admin closing a thread on ani that was not related to my actions and was not in need of admin input is perfectly fine next chat

deletion discussion about whatever linda hello bearcat i wanted to let you know that there a discussion about whether whatever linda should be deleted your comments are welcome at wikipedia articles for deletion whatever linda if you are new to the process articles for deletion is a group discussion not a vote that usually lasts seven days if you need it there is a guide on how to contribute last but not least you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top thanks

i will edit and add something to this too in a few hours after eloquence has had a turn there are many different views on this which should be properly ventilated 04 49 29 jul 2003 utc

he would not have to if he were not so goddamn crazy

ok looking through that it looks like they thought you g10 tagged articles with both good and bad content i agree with the general sentiment that one should delete only the minimum needed to render an article acceptable but i think you got read the riot act too severely for a simple misunderstanding of preferred options for fixing issues we agree are problematic

have a barnstar the rickk anti vandalism barnstar i hereby award you this barnstar for reverting so many vandalism edits lately and helping to keep wikipedia free of vandalism t c

anon posted stupid messages at administrators noticeboard and a user talk page in my name and at mr tibbs user talk page as can be easily verified the ip is from another country http wsarinnet cgi bin whoispl gives orgname choice one communications inc orgid choc address 100 chestnut st city rochester stateprov ny postalcode 14609 country us as posting in other users name in order to defame them is a severe violation of wikipedia policy the ip should be blocked indefinitely sorry if this is a wrong suspicion but as few people will have noticed my case i would like to know if this was user zer0faults who is from new york as well as he writes on his page furthermore as i have done nothing wrong and no evidence of any wrongdoing has been presented i protest my block a cynic remark about someone who abused his admin powers in no way justifies a one week block the user blocked in spite of a conflict of interest and in spite of the fact that i had not violated the rule as he claimed he did not apologize and instead threatened me and invited others to block me

well done now we all know about buchanan hermit and cannot sleep clown will eat me affair

hey queer boy stop messing with my edits

i saw the edits and i plan to provide more feedback within the next day

wikiproject derbyshire november newsletter 7

my feeling is that it a hoax but that would not be grounds for a speedy deletion i just cannot figure out what it saying at all just look at my edit summary it has words and the words are formed into sentences and the sentences make no sense talk

from user talk jimbo wales i wonder if you might consider i wonder if you might consider simply removing your political religious etc userboxes and asking others to do the same this seems to me to be the best way to quickly and easily end the userbox wars userboxes of a political or more broadly polemical nature are bad for the project they are attractive to the wrong kinds of people and they give visitors the wrong idea of what it means to be a wikipedian i think rather than us having to go through a mass deletion which is what is likely to happen if the userbox fad does not go away it will be better to simply change the culture one person at a time will you help me from wikien l the current situation with these things being in the main template namespace and promoted as if healthy and normal in the wikipedia namespace is that they are damaging to our culture they are attracting the wrong sort of people and giving newcomers the wrong idea of what it means to be a wikipedian that why they need to go not to censor people self expression but to make it clear that as a whole the community considers these things to be divisive and inappropriate jimmy wales jwales at wikiacom mon feb 20 19 34 13 utc 2006 class boilerplate style float center width 100 background ee9000 border solid darkblue 3px margin 1px from wikipedia userboxes beliefs it should be noted that use of such userboxes is strongly discouraged at wikipedia and it is likely that very soon all these userboxes will be deleted or moved to userspace soon their use and creation is not recommended at this timejimmy wales mon feb 20 18 01 utc

a lot of people fought for israeli independence the fact that this person passed on intelligence does not indicate that he any more widely regarded as notable than any others the standard is not whether what mr rosen did was important it whether it been recognized as notable by multiple independent sources also per wikipedia conflict of interest you should not be writing about your relative

i can see it both ways on the one hand we can find 2 substantial rss for every substantial building if we really check all possible newspaper sources including trade papers sooner or later they will all be in googlenews googlebooks at the very least for every building erected or planned before 1920 if we are going to hold to the gng we have several choices a use an increasingly stringent definition of what we consider rss for wlocal such as requiring regional sources but that wont have any effect in large cities b make a special provision about local requiring more than rss such as rss showing notability in particular ways c abandon or supplement gng in favor of distinct criteria that would exclude such articles such as hotel rating level d use combination articles e accept the articles but require substantial content f simply accept the articles g use a wikipediatwo or wikipedialocal project as a supplement to wikipedia the gng was originally adopted as a restrictive measure this is no longer the case the increase in easily available reliable web information has killed it usefulness this way it is now a rule that will increasingly work the other way around many deletionists try to elevate it into what they consider a basic policy on principles that are not specifically exclusionary but rely on confusion of wp n with wp v many deletionists and others think that in principle it is the only logically defensible way of having a guideline i wonder whether they will stick with it when it yields the opposite result to what they really want or yield a result that contradicts their own intuition what i really want in g above a supplement that will maintain wp v and wp npov and other foundation principles but not have a wp n barrier the inclusionists will be able to get in essentially everything the deletionists will be able to remove a good bit of borderline content from the present wikipedia and btw i do not consider wikia an equivalent for even if we had one that did not fail wp v and wp npo i remain committed to a free encyclopedia free in particular from advertising either in the articles or surrounding them but we have to deal with the present structure and the present question whatever may have been said elsewhere which i am deliberately not looking atwhat himalayan says above makes sense to me it is a combination of my choices c and e aboverely on ratings level and work for better content covent garden hotel is at present a very low quality articlethe afd seems based on the possibility of there being a better article the present one does in my opinion violate not travel and not promotional i would have had to support keeping it however because that is fixable i would have said weak keep as peterkingiron did for the same reason talk

thank you i have finished the credits so 2 can be cleared also queue 6 from the morning should be cleared well morning my time

well tiamut you replaced the existing source with this it is reasonable that it be tested as for arafat i imagined you were trying to write a comprehensive and neutral article with all facts of interest to the reader and bunking with arafat is at least as interesting as the chain smoking bit regarding the book 1 the organization he belongs to published it with a publisher that is at the least affiliated with it 2 selfpub applies to organizations as well as individuals 3 it is the sole source for this quote note the part in wp selfpub where it talks about if a fact is truly significant it would be included in another more reliable source 4 corrie is only peripherally the subject of the book and many of the statements in there are opinionated and unsourced in fact we do not even know what the source footnote 26 is it does not seem to be included in the google books version do you have a hard copy 5 the quotation is at variance with the language quoted in the hrw report while hrw is not a rs either it is a bit odd that there is this variance do we even know what language the autopsy was in they might be saying the same thing after all rocks falling on you is mechanical pressure we need to find a better source

ok if you interpret 3rr that way i can certainly live with it thanks for the clarification and sorry for wasting your time

hello there d maass unfortunately i deleted the article due to a lack of notability do you believe this to be a mistake on my part i have been known to make them 17

the addition was poorly written did not make sense and does not belong in the lead

class infobox width 315px align center archives archive 1 archive 2 archive 3 archive 4 thanks for bethlehem work hi i just wanted to stop by and say thank you for your efforts in copyediting the bethlehem article i am trying to improve it for ga status per it being the collaboration of the week for wikipedia wikiproject palestine award for your great photographic work the da vinci barnstar this award is given to may be awarded to anyone who has enhanced wikipedia through their technical work and you most certainly deserve it sincerely thank you izak for that very heartwarming award that someone has noticed my contributions and sees them as noteworthy makes all the hard work worthwhile hi gila yes you make beautiful art and i appreciate it as i am sure many others do best wishes hi gila it agood idea to have page for awards and barnstars like so armenian genocide peres denial of the genocide should be noted in this article failing to do so makes it more of a hagiography than a biography his shortcomings must also be mentioned in addition to his feats like winning the noble prize do you think it would fit better in political views in anycase it must and will be mentioned somewhere how about adding this in his political views segment peres foreign policy outlook is markedly realist for example to placate turkey the only significant muslim country in the region that is friendly towards israel peres has explicity denied the armenian genocide which caused an uproar among genocide scholars citation peres made these statements in 2001 when he was foreign minister clearly he was caving in to turkish pressure israel has very few friends and cannot afford to lose them so basically it is not free to take the position that would seem to mesh with its outlook and history which is to recognize that the armenians were murdered en mass now he is president an honorary position not a political one and his views whatever they may have been back then are worth about as much as mine are i have no problem with mentioning this view in the section on his political outlook but a separate section on this one utterance gives it undue importance and distorts the picture sumac opening sentence i do not know what the right wording is but do you see the problem with sumac also rhus is a genus of approximately 250 species of flowering plants in the family anacardiaceae first of all there is no reason to italicize sumac secondly it is not accurate to say sumac is a genus because there is no genus called sumac but there is one called rhus i may be too steeped in botanical jargon to easily come up wi

looks at site dubya tee eff i sent an email but i do not know if it goes anywhere 04 44 16 jan 2005 utc

hm i think maybe nanguo news would be better as no other titles seem to use the word newspaper if you agree please move it best talk

blog references are customarily unacceptable try to reference conventional media as it tends to be much more reliable

dyk on 6 september 2006 did you know was updated with a fact from the article old ministry of labour building which you created if you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article then please suggest it on the did you know talk page

some of the evidence is this talk contribs email if i write on your page reply on mine

i was not sure who tagged it but i was fairly sure it was not

your submission at articles for creation thank you for submitting an article to wikipedia your draft submission has been reviewed however the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted please take a look and respond if possible you can find it at wikipedia talk articles for creation treats magazine if there is no response within seven days the request may be declined if this happens please feel free to continue to work on the article you can resubmit it by adding the text subst submitdraft to the top of the article when you believe the concerns have been addressed thank you sonia

anons concerns cont would on the grav locked red dwarf planet note that a planet gravitationally locked to its star will have tidal heating like io so it not as if everything will freeze on the night side the great advantage of a grav locked planet is its stability i think it fair to say that stability is easier for life to deal with than instability if you look at the stability of jupiter great red spot 400 years and posited to be permanent weather on a grav locked planet should be relatively stable i presume a convection rising at the sun pole and falling at the dark pole with terrain eddies of course such a planet will have no axial tilt no day night cyclei do not even think it can have an eccentric orbit but i am unsure this greatly reduces the complexity of an organism job for example a plant does not need the night mode earth plants need they would not have to drop leaves for winter these seem like advantages to me based on the best information i can find on the us dept of energy site solar information what plants get on a clear equinox day is about 8 kwh m 2 peaking at 1 kw m 2 the vast majority of that power comes in the middle 8 hours less than 1 kwh m 2 is in morning and evening the night is essentially 0 kwh m 2not absolutely no but to the 2 digit accuracy i was using yes compare visual magnitudes of sun vs moon this varies by latitude and season of course now let plug this into the supposedly horrible 60 200 variation of a red dwarf instead of roughly 1 3 time at 1 kw yes it really is close to that equivalent energy would be all the time at 1 3 kw thus the variation would be 1 5 kw during minimums 60 of 1 3 kw and of course 200 is 2 3 kw thus ignoring frequency the red dwarf plant has an easier time the lower power of red dwarfs just pull the hz in considering earth shade plants which live on far less than 1 kw m 2 the hz is where the total solar and gravitational energy are right for water organizationally perhaps the best thing would be to treat earth like planets in the main flow of the article then discuss tidally locked red dwarf planets with a note that thinking on the issue is in flux and note that chemosynthsis biospheres would be possible even around brown dwarfs or outlying moons like titan and europa perhaps keeping original numbers 1 suitable star systems 11 spectral class 31 binary systems since all but the closest binaries are ok put it here 12 a stable habitable zone 2 planetary characteristics 21 mass 13 22 acceptable energy variation as i hope i showed about low is not really necessary include the case of jovian moons in the hz 14 high metallicity it comes from system formation but it a planet property 23 geochemistry maybe combine with metallicity 3 alternative biologies 32 red dwarf systems tidally locked low light new chemosynthesis based biology 4 on no changes i should add this is a really good article maybe i am trying to gild the lily mistake i am not a specialist but mars by contrast is nearly or perhaps totally geologically dead and has lost much of its atmosphere 10 mass paragraph seems doubtful to me i mean mars still has volcanoes mount olympus for example so it sees strange to me that it geologically dead but once again i am no specialist mars does have volcanoes but as far as i know they are not really active so nothing is really powering them and geological activity is not really showing up luna earth moon has volcanoes and it accepted as geologically dead the presence of volcanoes does not mean active volcanoes that basically what i was trying to say i guess i just never made it really clear picture size can a larger size by found for the habitability zone picture i would like to use it as a background but it wo not scale up i downloaded it here http librarythinkquestorg though i cannot remember the exact spot on the site an image search for habitable zone turns it up first thing but only at 19k earth geological activity i am pretty sure that the earth is not geologically active simply because of its large mass surface area ratio from what i have read i believe that planets are probably heated mostly by radioactive decay and or tidal for

it just the damn internet

nothing incorrect there

shit keep your sorry ass shit post off my page

definitely far more than you

bc highway markers it not just the highway 7 page he removed all of the markers of all markers from other metro vancouver provincial highways speak up

no i am afraid i am not there is nothing in that phrase that can be qualified in anyway as warrant to a warning and where have i used the everybody is doing it to the contrary i am ready to pay the price but this does not warrant any warning and i advice you to submit that phrase to any administrator and see what he she has to say as for your adminsitrator abilities i judge what i see it is my right to question it you should not dump every critics when they are in ones talk page as incivility and justify a block now you tell me how am i supposed to assume good faith when you single me out on the middle of discussions that when my incivilities are compared to what is done else it is nothing while you appear to totally ignore those i simply request common sense being administrator should assume that you know that the most important thing is what wikipedia is it is an encyclopedia and articles are the most important thing you as an administrator are above all a user like any other user administrative privilages should only be used when a user is disturbing so for you to warn me you should justify how telling someone that he refuse to listen when he really refuse to listen warrant to a warning or how am i disturbing it is to you to convince me now that your blocking of a contributor a wikipedian as much as you is not disturbing also that you refuse to accept your mistake on the face of the obvious does not give a good opinion of you but i am sure that is the last of your worries just consider that everyone make mistakes whatever or not they recognize it is what matters ix

about your preventive warning should not you follow your own advice first in the al khwarizmi page as well as al biruni page you have been exccessively edit happy you kept deleting legit sources i gave in the al biruni page and in al khwarizmi i have two sources that state that al khwarizmi is an arab you deleted it and kept muslim since you do not have sources to prove he persian in the al biruni page when i gave two more sources and cited one in the article it got prominently deleted why is it because you have a problem with proof that he could have been arab does that disturb the propaganda you are trying to spread please take these nice policies and follow them before you start giving me preventive warnings wp v wp npov and wp nor

it is a reply to your message it does not start a new discussion you are violating my right for an answer

update wikipedia in the news section on the main page candidates who updates the template i made a suggestion like 6 hours ago and nothing has happened in a day or so it will be irrelevant 2006 commonwealth games talk i am not sure how that page is processed talk

bayern munich vote it has to take place this 1 guy keeps changing the manager position