Datasets:

affahrizain

/

jigsaw-toxic-comment

like 1

the editor in question is strongly suspected to be wikipedia long term abuse cause of death vandal a link like cbe is piped through a redirect because if you hover over that link it shows the full title and when you click on it you get the redirected from commander of the most excellent order of the british empire message at the top of the page it also a wp notbroken situation one day we might split out the five different levels into their own articles the article must not be moved since it covers seven awards member of the most excellent order of the british empire mbe officer of the most excellent order of the british empire obe commander of the most excellent order of the british empire cbe dame commander of the most excellent order of the british empire dbe knight commander of the most excellent order of the british empire kbe dame grand cross of the most excellent order of the british empire gbe knight grand cross of the most excellent order of the british empire gbe that is five different levels two having gender specific titles as i mentioned before a lot of people think that obe stands for order of the british empire it does not since the o stands for officer

if they were a self appointed organisation how would that explain the fact that they are directly involved with designing the national flags of british territories

concerning the article hinayana buddhism from wikipedia as a note in thailand where the national religion is theravada buddhism the national museum in its display concerning the history of the kingdom of thailand specifically the sukkhothai and ayutthaya periods makes a very clear distinction between theravada and hinayana buddhism listing it as a seperate religion along with mahayana buddhism and christianity that was at times under the patronage of the king it would appear that the thai hierarchy of buddhism has no confusion concerning the use of this term

i believe since the category was in a template when it was updated it may take a few days for it to update john reaves

it has the advantage that it will only upload images that have the correct licence

too technical comment the maintenance template too technical has been removed i consider large swathes of the article are too technical and incomprehensible for instance what on earth do these statements mean tensed sentences which can neither be translated into synonymous tenseless sentences nor be given tenseless token reflexive truth conditions correspond if true to tensed facts the experience of temporal becoming like our experience of the external world is properly regarded as veridical in the absence of objective distinctions between past present and future the relations ordering events on the tenseless theory are only gratuitously regarded as genuinely temporal relations of earlier later than the claim that temporal becoming is mind dependent is self defeating since the subjective illusion of becoming involves itself an objective becoming in the contents of consciousness time as it plays a role in physics is a pale abstraction of a richer metaphysical reality omitting indexical elements such as the here and the now in the interest of universalizing the formulations of natural laws can anyone make the article more readable and comprehensible or are we all pretending that it makes perfect sense because we are afraid to look unintelligent for not understanding it

thank you for experimenting with wikipedia your test worked and has been reverted or removed please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia which you are more than welcome to do talk

vellalars as agriculturists i dispute the argument that vellalars are basically agriculturists even historian mr vincent a smith in his book the oxford student history of india says vellalars are one of the caste in tamil nadu which do not have any association with any one particular job like every caste of tamil nadu including mudhaliar udayar vanniar nadar gownder vellalars too involved in farming you can also refer the gazette of salem district publish by tamil nadu government vellalars migrated to kerala along with pandiyan kings as pandians needed scholars with them when they had war with cheras if no one replies to this dispute i will re write the contents about vellalars occupation

umm maybe you should block aol proxies permanetly you goddam mother fucking dick sucking bitches i licked your mothers cunt i came all on your stuff fucking fags i am 2 y o

templates every rcat in templatespace

the text is very unclear in this a rticle as to its menaing needs rewriting by someone who knows the subject

it is best to have these things checked if only so they can be dismissed rather than having vague accusations floating around

redirect talk members allowances committee

i know and i think i see what you are getting at but prods that have been removed from an article are considered contesting it and therefore should not be re added unless the prod removal was clearly vandalism or a mistake read wp prod and yes i know it says an explanation should be left as to why it should it does not make the prod removal any less valid

sticky parkin parkin 17 38 5

curiously enough the user reverting my additions was not even warned by the blocking admin

__toc__ july 2008 please stop your disruptive editing if your vandalism continues you will be blocked from editing wikipedia cobra

career highlights section should his home run against the brewers really be mentioned there i do not consider a pitcher home run that spectacular compared to the other achievements in the box

also if you want to use template messages please remember to subst them had to do it for you here everyme

1908 left to right fritz klimsch august gaul walter leistikow hans baluschek paul cassirer max slevogt seated george mosson standing carl max kruse standing max liebermann seated emil rudolf wei standing lovis corinth standing

i see well you can tell that i do not watch this page or related discussions about this page or middle east topics in general i imagine that such a ruling was based on a history of page move warring is there a history of move warring on this page if not it seem premature to apply that standard to this page but you guys may know the particulars better

please do not vandalize pages as you did with this edit to geometry if you continue to do so you will be blocked from editing

stop reverting when the proper name of a piece of work uses a capitalized to then the article should be capitalized if you read closely it says that this exception can be made to titles that are unique it is the same as you wanting your username to not be capitalized despite wikipedia guidelines if you continue to revert all my pages for ridiculous reasons i will request mediation which will eventually lead to arbitration you need to get a life and stop obsessing over things that you are wrong about

there is no proof that your mother has been killed but that may change soon

don murphy please do not revert the change i made per wiki standards personal forums in which the person partcipates are valid sources don murphy says those are his films then they are his films why do you leave three of them and revert the fourth you are out of line here and need to stop thank you

so how does any of this justify wholesale deletion of the criticism section in fact if what you are saying is true then you should have no problem with my edits to the criticism section your argument is that it feasible to cover the relevant controversies in a neutral and balanced manner written as part of the history section and avoiding unnecessary direct quotation of political opponents smear phrases which means that not only are can changes to the quotes of criticism of counterpunch be done but that would also mean you need to have the quotes of criticisms to exist in the first place in order to make the changes so that the quotes are written in a balanced manner

bias in the introduction the introduction last line since he became the leader of the bnp several educational institutions have invited him to speak on political radicalism multiculturalism and bnp policy is unweighted and does not at all represent the controversy outcries and actual uncommonness of the particular invites also where is the mention of griffin unquestionable notoriety are we trying to inform people about him in an encyclopedic sense ie give a broad and unbiased picture of him that would actually be useful to someone or make a safe unoffensive bnp friendly article please do not leave this to other people i have already made a few unsucessful edits today it only takes one committed person to revert you on wikipedia to make change impossible for any single editor to achieve there is a 3rr revert rule and admins are always ready to block users and lock articles when perceived edit wars happen wikipedia needs people to jump in and have a go

that was not me that said i am not editing under the name ghoast user that was another guy look at the ip numbers there different i swaer you need to use your brain

let me inform you that i have also put my opinion in the talk page of the article but i can see in his talk page that you are a very controversial person and must be why you are being forwarded me to communicate with you from the talk page of article so i already gave my opinion in the talk page of the article and i going to defend it as there are enough arguments to do it

outdent the article could use more information about manufacture but as wikipedia policies guidelines against spammy linking and other forms of promotion make clear see wp el wp spam wp coi wp not etc links like that are not the way to do this talk contribs

marked for deletion hello i am not sure if this is what you are talking about when you say notability but i have included the pdf that the info comes from i hope this helps if there is anything else i can do please let me know monitorfuse

someone else said so the comment above was dishonest this excuse is stated 16 days after your threat after

new research i think this article needs to be updated as per the new research that has come in concerning the dna of the skull which is very interesting and the recent ruling out of any known human deformities as the factor for its size and shape by experts

yes i have not made any of these edits

that does sound much more challenging than i had thought what would you suggest as a good topic

when the grass is cut

oh now sources have to come from more than one country i had not noticed that requirement before is that true of all wikipedia articles for example if there are 10 sources all from the united states new york times washington post san francicso chronicle etc etc for a particular point in a given article wikipedia editors would insist on a source outside the united states if so that good to know sam one person obsession is another person interest i would not waste your precious time worrying about what other people do or do not find interesting

as it stands you say this posed picture indicates to you that manning was not that frail and looks smiling and happy if it is placed here to put the lie to the text and sources about aspects of her past then it is arguably not neutral however cute i would not support having a picture of kissinger smiling and joking next to text that described him as being in serious wartime negotiations i am not saying the picture is objectionable in and of itself i am saying pending a chance for arguments for its inclusion it makes the article less unarguably neutral if the picture causes you to say that the text overstates her height issues health issues level of childhood happiness etc then it is arguably not an appropriate image based on the text and sources describing her past __

seems unnecessary we should start a discussion on merging them

i think you are is right but to prevent edit wars maybe you can post a rewrited version on this talk page to see how people reacts to your changes

your edit to 30 days of night film i have re added the quote but i have expanded on information from that particular citation such as the director saying that ben templesmith illustrations would be reflected in production design and liking nelson draft the best of the three does this work better talk contrib

asshole fuck off

cheers my adversary probably wo not think much of it though talk

dear omedon although you did the first revert and then did another one you accused me of edit warring that a personal attack why exactly are not you guilty of the same i am giving you the victory but letting you know i believe you should not be an editor because you are not qualified its time for wikipedia to go pro fire all the amateur editors and hire a professional staff ie writers and editors who wo not try to whitewash historical villains like jefferson davis by referring to him as an american and deleting any attempt to identify him for what he really was which was the leading proponent and a hefty practitioner of slavery ardenhathaway

i realised that its good use and then reverted my edits to your talk page see my old edit and revert i donno what is hinking yet as for campa cola i left a message for spammers which should solve problem in long term

unspecified source for image bp01gif thanks for uploading image bp01gif i notice the file description page currently does not specify who created the content so the copyright status is unclear if you have not created this file yourself then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on wikipedia see copyright tagging below if you did not create the file yourself then you need to specify where it was found ie in most cases link to the website where it was taken from and the terms of use for content from that page if the file also does not have a copyright tag then one should be added if you created took the picture audio or video then the tag can be used to release it under the gfdl if you believe the media meets the criteria at wikipedia fair use use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at wikipedia image copyright tags fair_use see wikipedia image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use if you have uploaded other files consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them too you can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded as described on criteria for speedy deletion if you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page thank you

i have gone ahead and copied a good bit over and done some rephrasing and all that jazz go and take a look i would be interested in adding a bit more about the differences with laveyan satanism such as the social action vs self indulgence and belief on atheism if you do not feel up to adding them in yourself get me the info somehow and i will do it i can be reached at my talk page or i can be e mailed from my talk contribs

but this is exactly what you have done countless times blanket rev everything

lol that brilliant classic pseudoscientific gobbledygook at its best thanks for the laugh do you have any thoughts about the doctrine of signatures being a key concept in homeopathy

i was hoping that and might have been your edits they looked medical the one about panic and exhaustion i thought may have been an anecdote possibly reported somewhere i will keep searching for sources i have copyedited simon mitchell a bit and commented at wp articles for deletion captain trevor jackson calling for a keep on simon mitchell you should comment there when you get a moment to spare i will find time later to see if captain trevor jackson has sufficient notability to justify it but wp blp1e may be a problem

most of the version you have mentioned has been included now as it is quite well presented and makes the subject coverage wider len

the mute was created for the jaguar

imo they either have some substance ie the stuff yuber keeps wanting to chop or they all become redirects to spencer

done based on your request on your talk page i have added and added a too in the hope of someone translating the stub of an italian article and adding it to the one sentence that we have here more will be needed but it is already superior to the version i saw claiming conti to be a former president of italy it no longer looks like a hoax

dear sir mr watson i agree with you completely i will go back and cite book and page number and in the documentary the time stamp where the claim is presented regarding warner brothers illogical thinking at the time i have no doubt that today warner bros and all of the world respect and regards bruce in a much better way than it did in 1973 or in 1978 when linda lee book on her late husband was first published we have grown closer with more understanding in and less bigotry in the civilised parts of our world regards of warmth and respect for a chance to practice my american english grammar and being so kind in my edits out of the sand box cathie

what this article is sorely lacking is proper statistics to show that the alleged genocide exists only in some people fevered imaginations

regarding edits made during april 20 2007 please do not add nonsense to wikipedia it is considered vandalism if you would like to experiment use the sandbox thank you if this is an ip address and it is shared by multiple users ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits

seksen the 10 000 turkish cypriots who were protesting a few months ago see this were not protesting against the world no country imposed any embargoe on north cyprus the protests were aimed at turkey and the imposed austerity measures and the fact that they want to be independent and manage their own affairs so effectively they feel they are not independent but under occupation or if you do not like the word under the control of turkey back to the issue the nicosia article should have the same information structure as the cyprus article in fact the the trnc or the occupation for that matter is not even mentioned in the cyprus infobox that why north cyprus exists we have to be consistent otherwise what is the point of having north nicosia lefkoa distict should be mentioned there to me it makes sense for nicosia to represent the roc as it officially does and north nicosia to represent the trnc you cannot have both

removal of image user abhishek191288 has removed images of the ranchi rajdhani express without a valid reason other than his feelings about my reason for posting the images would like others to view the image comment on it

muniz for the second time i have deleted kelly b muniz from the list neither the list nor google offer any evidence warranting munizs inclusion on the list

on the top you say the post be answered but my last 2 posts have not been answered yet

reply okay thank you for your comment

administratore i need your help to stop direktor and alasdair they are fools look my talk page please and i want a 2 page letter of apology from direktor

it at user bejnar faizal ismail

okay you are right here but i still think you are wrong about why there should not be a section about dear in the shooting article let compromise

according to national bolshevik party the nbps are not officially branded extremist just because you personally feel they are extremist does not give you broad latitude in editing articles accordingly

knol at last about time knol came along i am tired of the nonsense that is published by wikipedia finally the world according to the world not a bunch of narrow minded wikipedia sysops and administrators

no i have not but will today earlier i did not see this page

i do not think this qualifies as meatpuppetry s he acting on her his own advocating for the blocked editor canvassing maybe but not meatpuppetry weigh anchor catacomb

kiss my ass you limp dick loser

merge ulrich merkel here since the one assertion made there is made here i do not see the point of a merge process why not simply redirect if some indepedent content inappropriate to this article is found it is quite easy to turn the redirect into a now viable article

tim i have skimmed through that article and i must say it a privilege to even be asked to review it so thank you very much alas am a bit tied for time at the moment with stuff in the real world yes i think it still exists so any review i offer will probably be for very tiny spelling mistakes and missing links if there are even any at all of course i know so little about bax that reading it will be a complete education

indeed best to just ignore this because there a high chance this will get reported again

governors of tamil nadu nicholas i have been updating list of governors of tamil nadu page for the past few days can you please take a look and let me know if it is fl material thanks

i would like to mention that you made the rather blatant sexual and violent yourself so if you want to call the police for sending sexually harassing messages to yourself be my guest my original message which was admittedly not very civil itself and i do apologize was quite different it can also be grounds for a block yourself i am also rather amused by this formerly congratulatory comment being removed

i concur our external link policy is indeed harsh but it is the price to pay to not have 50 el at the bottom of each article especially in the it related articles do not worry we all make mistakes and yours was done in good faith but your edits were against wikipedia policy do not hesitate to put the helpme tag back if you need anything else talk

september 2008 thank you for experimenting with wikipedia your test worked and it has been reverted or removed please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia your test is here shiny oohhh

blotto adrift admit when you make a mistake several other users have pointed out corrections and you still change the pages back to your edits you and people like you are a shame to wikipedia ps if you were a scholar which your not but somehow are allowed to edit again going to the creditablity of this site you would have access to scholars portal

problems with drugs so they went with nick stahl instead

has about russian jewish book peddlers

fuck you barack obama is a muslim he sucks ass

look at the freaking image page and the cited isbns try google searching for once in your life the manga did not start its first english publication in 2004 gwern contribs 19 13 28 january 2012 gmt

nor do my postings indicate that i am anti social have gone rogue or in any other way must be stopped before i do more damage

checkuser how the hell do i use a checkuser help me please jan

hahaha gross you want to expand the feces portion of the anal sex article duuude here let me say it in html that gross horizontal rules rule haha get it

rictus a prod template has been added to the article rictus suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process all contributions are appreciated but this article may not satisfy wikipedia criteria for inclusion and the deletion notice explains why see also what wikipedia is not and wikipedia deletion policy you may contest the proposed deletion by removing the dated prod notice but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page also please consider improving the article to address the issues raised even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to articles for deletion where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached if you endorse deletion of the article and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page please tag it with

actually i could not find a block on adam carr nor an an auto block from using the auto block locator adam can you try again to edit please if you still cannot edit then i am at a loss maybe someone else can spot something i am missing i am posting for you as clown suggested talk

wow you are doing some great work looking good i will continue to work on hnin start

why is this so important that wikipeida must publish this mans income for 2005 just because a crusading blogger who works for the tribune needs to publish minutia does not mean it encyclopedic in content wp blp wp grapevine why is this information not found on other northern illinois office holders why only roskam what value is this information other than salacious gossip any finally why so vigorously oppose this

remember the fact that wikepedia is not a property of psychotic terrorist hindus as well control ur language man i can already visualise u when the facts about terrorist hindus have already been exposed to the world this clearly shows the typical mentality of hindu extremists like u who do not want to accept the facts and dont try to fool me with those official copy pastes of wiki

well the only edit i did there was to fix a link to a new article i split off so not sure i can be of much help

the content you are adding is promotional in tone making the article read like an ad i see nothing valuable about adding where the information desk is every mall has one except maybe a few really dead ones nor do i see any value in listing the bus stops as those usually cannot be sourced malls are common places for bus stops and his otters broken clamshells otter chirps help

the point is that people were too busy finding more critiques towards wolfowitz than criques towards the power of nightmares im new to wiki so i havent had time to sign on and learn the game but i will soon i just thought i had to throw in my two cents i will refrain from using the term you people if there would be a civil open discussion that doesnt resort to worse ad hominems like war monger or neo fascist i have plenty of more links to provide

i am not well versed on his topic but it appears there was a similar unrest in 18th century i think a good merging is sorely needed here

the silver devastation a prod template has been added to the article the silver devastation suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process all contributions are appreciated but the article may not satisfy wikipedia criteria for inclusion and the deletion notice explains why see also what wikipedia is not and wikipedia deletion policy you may contest the proposed deletion by removing the dated prod notice but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page also please consider improving the article to address the issues raised even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to articles for deletion where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached 1 talk

this is not a forum if no explanation is given by the writers then asking the question here is pointless