a98zhang/ibm_argument_example · Datasets at Hugging Face

argument stringlengths 35 251	topic stringlengths 21 52	example stringlengths 37 230
wikipedia is not used by all people and no one is forced to work for them. we should not have to give them a subsidy for a service we did not ask for.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia is notoriously unreliable as to the accuracy of its articles	We should subsidize Wikipedia	If Wikipedia were subsidized it would be less objective by being accountable to a single funding source.
wikipedia is one of a number of resources, it does not warrant special treatment	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia is one of the best resources for information nowadays and we should do everything to ensure it continues and grows to remain an excellent source of information	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia is run by the people and it needs to stay that way because it is working.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia is still a private website, so giving a site money to keep it running is unethical. why not subsidize any other site then?	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia is supported just fine with private donations and has continued to function without the need for a subsidy.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	If Wikipedia were subsidized it would be less objective by being accountable to a single funding source.
wikipedia is the greatest unbias source of information we have. it encourages learning and is necessary especially for low income individuals. we must continue to support it.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia is the internet's greatest repository of knowledge and should be publicly supported in order to continue its mission.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia is the largest online encyclopedia in the world and we must ensure its proper functioning	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia is the most important and largest source of information on the internet and we must support it	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia is the most incredible resource of open source information, by subsidizing it we can ensure it is policed better	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia is the only free source of information with references that's guaranteed to be accurate. it's needed, especially for those who can't afford anything else.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia is the search page most used by students and is an updated tool that helps knowledge and should be subsidized to ensure its proper functioning	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia is the world's free knowledge base.it should be cherished, supported and improved.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
Wikipedia is the world's largest online repository of knowledge and should be supported by public dollars to continue its mission.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia is too often edited by unreliable contributors and therefore is not quality enough to consider funding.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia is too vulnerable to manipulation to be considered a trusted source.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia is useful in helping people of all ages learn about various topics..	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia is valuable knowledge resource that should not be allowed to go under due to lack of resources and so should be subsidized	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia is very informative and keeps up to date on millions of topics.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is not a reliable search engine because of the information exchange methodology they have, since anyone could place what they would like on that page
wikipedia makes enough money on its own	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia provides so much information to the world that it is time we subsidize it.
wikipedia makes enough money on it's own	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia provides so much information to the world that it is time we subsidize it.
wikipedia needs no additional funding, the revenue it gains from donations is sufficient to keep it afloat	We should subsidize Wikipedia	If Wikipedia were subsidized it would be less objective by being accountable to a single funding source.
wikipedia needs to be publicly funded to keep it honest	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia needs to be subsidized because it is an important online research tool used by many.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia needs to remain as is. if the government gets involved with finances, we're looking at the possibility of a sway of information.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	government subsidies open the door to government control, this would potentially ruin the impartiality of wikipedia
wikipedia offers a quick and easy way of finding information that a person is looking for and subsidizing it would give them more funds for research.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia offers a vast database that uses various sources to insure accurate information and subsidization would allow for more accuracies to raise the factual level of info on wikipedia.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia offers so much valuable information. it gives you immediate updates on many topics.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia often contains false information and so can lead to people believing that have no validity in reality.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is not a reliable search engine because of the information exchange methodology they have, since anyone could place what they would like on that page
wikipedia often provides biased, inaccurate information due to lax editing policies and procedures.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is not a reliable search engine because of the information exchange methodology they have, since anyone could place what they would like on that page
wikipedia opened under its own steam and maintains itself with voluntary contributions so there is no need to subsidize it.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia pages can, essentially, be edited by anyone, so is not a reliable source of informtion and on this basis should not receive any subsidies.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia plays a vital role in sharing information on the internet, and should be subsidized to continue functioning	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia promotes national and world learning and should be subsidized	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia provides a great service which provides a safe place to find info on all types of topics	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia provides a great utility to most if not all citizens and therefore it is just to subsidize it.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia provides a knowledge bank for many people to be able to utilize. if it is subsidized then it can continue to do research and provide better information.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia provides a useful collection of knowledge, and should be subsidized to ensure its continued existance	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia provides a valuable public service; subsiding it would guarantee equal access to everyone.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia provides a valuable service, yet has to rely on donations to survive. if there were no wikipedia, access to impartial, well-sourced information on the web would be limited.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia provides a vast amount of information at our fingertips	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia provides a vast amount of knowledge to be accessible to all. subsidizing this will ensure this knowledge continues to be available.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia provides a wealth of information on any subject you can think of. this is highly benificial to the education system and should be subsidized.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia provides a wealth of information to schools to aid with the teaching of students so we should subsidize it.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia provides an endless amount of information right at our fingertips.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia provides so much information to the world that it is time we subsidize it.
wikipedia provides an invaluable service and we need to secure its ability to exist in the near and distant future	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia provides good information	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is not a reliable search engine because of the information exchange methodology they have, since anyone could place what they would like on that page
Wikipedia provides important information to people around the world.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia provides information that is free and easy to get on any subject	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia provides instant information to help educate someone on any topic	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia provides so much information to the world that it is time we subsidize it.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia provides useful information	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is not a reliable search engine because of the information exchange methodology they have, since anyone could place what they would like on that page
wikipedia provides useful informations	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is not a reliable search engine because of the information exchange methodology they have, since anyone could place what they would like on that page
wikipedia provides valuable information for the public and must be kept free.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia provides valuable information not only to the public but to educational institutions and so we should subsidize it to keep it going.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia provides vital information quickly. subsidizing it guarantees that this can continue.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia puts a world of information at our fingertips	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia relies too much on the people to pay for them and risk shutting down each year	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia serves a great purpose and is very valuable	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia shoud be independent and with subsidization this may be at risk depending on the subsidization source	We should subsidize Wikipedia	government subsidies open the door to government control, this would potentially ruin the impartiality of wikipedia
wikipedia should aim to be a neutral source; public funding would help this goal by making it a public good.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia should be financed different ways	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia should be left as is. once we pour money into it, we lose the authenticity.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia should be self funding as the company has access to the resources it needs without subsidies	We should subsidize Wikipedia	If Wikipedia were subsidized it would be less objective by being accountable to a single funding source.
wikipedia should be subsidized as it a valuable educational tool.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia should be subsidized as it is a collected world-wide encyclopedia for all people to gain knowledge	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia should be subsidized as it is an important free source of information for all.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia should be subsidized because it is a great place for cultural iconography to continue to be added to from many different people.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia should be subsidized because it shares a wealth of information that can help people learn and grow, without subsidization it might go away	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia should be subsidized because of how easy it is to use it	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia should not be subsidized as it is easily manipulated to contain incorrect information which can spread quickly and not accurate	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia should not be subsidized as it is not legislated and therefore is not a legitimate reference point. anyone can update wiki and so it should not be subsidized as a legitimate reference.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia shouldn't be subsidized because the information isn't all that reliable	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia struggles to get donations and we cannot afford to lose such a vast source of information.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia subsidizing will engage more people to create content and to make it more widely available	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia supplies valuable information in a moment's notice.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia will be able to get rid of their yearly donation begging if they get funds from the government.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	A government-funded Wikipedia would become a government-controlled Wikipedia.
Wikipedia will not remain neutral or independent if it receives government subsidies.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	government subsidies open the door to government control, this would potentially ruin the impartiality of wikipedia
wikipedia works fine the way it is already set up.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia would be better if it were controlled by money.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia would be more accurate if it was subsidized.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
wikipedia, more and more, has been shown to be a source of relatively unbiased information.	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is the internet's greatest repository of knowledge and should be publicly supported in order to continue its mission.
wikipedia's only flaw as an unrivalled source of information is the lack of paid staff to ensure all articles are accurate, a subsidy could make it the most impressive free encyclopedia we have ever known	We should subsidize Wikipedia	wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.
will allow more men to become priests and help with the shortage of priests.	The vow of celibacy should be abandoned	the vow of celibacy should be abandoned because it represents a major barrier to men considering entering the priesthood
will be the best possible solution for the person prosecuted, according to the particular circumstances of the case	The use of public defenders should be mandatory	public defenders should be mandatory because they can provide free legal representation to those who are accused
will help eliminate gender discrimination	We should adopt gender-neutral language	adopting a gender neutral language enables us to speak to each other in a more compassionate and understanding way.
will help insure that everyone is treat equally.	We should adopt gender-neutral language	adopting a gender neutral language enables us to speak to each other in a more compassionate and understanding way.
will increase the capture and conviction of criminals	Entrapment should be legalized	entrapment should be legalized because sometimes this tactic is the only way to apprehend repeat offenders.
will lead to an increase in copycat products	We should abolish intellectual property rights	intellectual property rights are so important in that they don't allow someone to just steal someone else's ideas and creations for their own benefit.
will lead to an increase in impaired drivers	We should legalize cannabis	there are many arguments, including it will save money as enforcement of current laws costs an estimated $8 billion a year in the u.s. alone and will cut down on a lot of crime
will lead to confusion and misunderstangings	We should adopt gender-neutral language	gender-neutral language shouldn't be adopted because in writing consistency is sometimes hard to keep straight with those pronouns
with a austerity regime necessary programs could lose or at least have hefty cuts to their programs.	We should adopt an austerity regime	an austerity regime hurts the poorest in our society
with a growing population and more people wanting to eat meat, factory farming is the only solution.	We should ban factory farming	factory farming is not humane for the animals and should be banned.
with a help for wikipedia, this can improve in many ways	We should subsidize Wikipedia	Wikipedia could provide information on more topics and in more languages if it were subsidized.
with a multi party system it can be harder for a party to win outright	We should adopt a multi-party system	the multi-party system offers voters more choices that may get more people involved in politics
with a multi party system voters will have more of a choice	We should adopt a multi-party system	the multi-party system offers voters more choices that may get more people involved in politics
with a multi-party system, it would be easier for a party with radical views to come intro power, resulting in reforms that could be disastrous.	We should adopt a multi-party system	the multi-party system offers voters more choices that may get more people involved in politics
with a standardized curriculum, homeschooling is as viable a method as regular schooling. it can allow a learning atmosphere for children who would otherwise not be able to attend school, for various reasons.	Homeschooling should be banned	homeschooling is best for children where the schools in the area are not conducive to learning

wikipedia is not used by all people and no one is forced to work for them. we should not have to give them a subsidy for a service we did not ask for.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia is notoriously unreliable as to the accuracy of its articles

We should subsidize Wikipedia

If Wikipedia were subsidized it would be less objective by being accountable to a single funding source.

wikipedia is one of a number of resources, it does not warrant special treatment

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia is one of the best resources for information nowadays and we should do everything to ensure it continues and grows to remain an excellent source of information

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia is run by the people and it needs to stay that way because it is working.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia is still a private website, so giving a site money to keep it running is unethical. why not subsidize any other site then?

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia is supported just fine with private donations and has continued to function without the need for a subsidy.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

If Wikipedia were subsidized it would be less objective by being accountable to a single funding source.

wikipedia is the greatest unbias source of information we have. it encourages learning and is necessary especially for low income individuals. we must continue to support it.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia is the internet's greatest repository of knowledge and should be publicly supported in order to continue its mission.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia is the largest online encyclopedia in the world and we must ensure its proper functioning

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia is the most important and largest source of information on the internet and we must support it

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia is the most incredible resource of open source information, by subsidizing it we can ensure it is policed better

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia is the only free source of information with references that's guaranteed to be accurate. it's needed, especially for those who can't afford anything else.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia is the search page most used by students and is an updated tool that helps knowledge and should be subsidized to ensure its proper functioning

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia is the world's free knowledge base.it should be cherished, supported and improved.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

Wikipedia is the world's largest online repository of knowledge and should be supported by public dollars to continue its mission.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia is too often edited by unreliable contributors and therefore is not quality enough to consider funding.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia is too vulnerable to manipulation to be considered a trusted source.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia is useful in helping people of all ages learn about various topics..

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia is valuable knowledge resource that should not be allowed to go under due to lack of resources and so should be subsidized

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia is very informative and keeps up to date on millions of topics.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is not a reliable search engine because of the information exchange methodology they have, since anyone could place what they would like on that page

wikipedia makes enough money on its own

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia provides so much information to the world that it is time we subsidize it.

wikipedia makes enough money on it's own

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia provides so much information to the world that it is time we subsidize it.

wikipedia needs no additional funding, the revenue it gains from donations is sufficient to keep it afloat

We should subsidize Wikipedia

If Wikipedia were subsidized it would be less objective by being accountable to a single funding source.

wikipedia needs to be publicly funded to keep it honest

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia needs to be subsidized because it is an important online research tool used by many.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia needs to remain as is. if the government gets involved with finances, we're looking at the possibility of a sway of information.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

government subsidies open the door to government control, this would potentially ruin the impartiality of wikipedia

wikipedia offers a quick and easy way of finding information that a person is looking for and subsidizing it would give them more funds for research.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia offers a vast database that uses various sources to insure accurate information and subsidization would allow for more accuracies to raise the factual level of info on wikipedia.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia offers so much valuable information. it gives you immediate updates on many topics.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia often contains false information and so can lead to people believing that have no validity in reality.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is not a reliable search engine because of the information exchange methodology they have, since anyone could place what they would like on that page

wikipedia often provides biased, inaccurate information due to lax editing policies and procedures.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is not a reliable search engine because of the information exchange methodology they have, since anyone could place what they would like on that page

wikipedia opened under its own steam and maintains itself with voluntary contributions so there is no need to subsidize it.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia pages can, essentially, be edited by anyone, so is not a reliable source of informtion and on this basis should not receive any subsidies.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia plays a vital role in sharing information on the internet, and should be subsidized to continue functioning

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia promotes national and world learning and should be subsidized

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia provides a great service which provides a safe place to find info on all types of topics

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia provides a great utility to most if not all citizens and therefore it is just to subsidize it.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia provides a knowledge bank for many people to be able to utilize. if it is subsidized then it can continue to do research and provide better information.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia provides a useful collection of knowledge, and should be subsidized to ensure its continued existance

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia provides a valuable public service; subsiding it would guarantee equal access to everyone.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia provides a valuable service, yet has to rely on donations to survive. if there were no wikipedia, access to impartial, well-sourced information on the web would be limited.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia provides a vast amount of information at our fingertips

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia provides a vast amount of knowledge to be accessible to all. subsidizing this will ensure this knowledge continues to be available.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia provides a wealth of information on any subject you can think of. this is highly benificial to the education system and should be subsidized.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia provides a wealth of information to schools to aid with the teaching of students so we should subsidize it.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia provides an endless amount of information right at our fingertips.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia provides so much information to the world that it is time we subsidize it.

wikipedia provides an invaluable service and we need to secure its ability to exist in the near and distant future

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia provides good information

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is not a reliable search engine because of the information exchange methodology they have, since anyone could place what they would like on that page

Wikipedia provides important information to people around the world.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia provides information that is free and easy to get on any subject

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia provides instant information to help educate someone on any topic

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia provides so much information to the world that it is time we subsidize it.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia provides useful information

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is not a reliable search engine because of the information exchange methodology they have, since anyone could place what they would like on that page

wikipedia provides useful informations

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is not a reliable search engine because of the information exchange methodology they have, since anyone could place what they would like on that page

wikipedia provides valuable information for the public and must be kept free.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia provides valuable information not only to the public but to educational institutions and so we should subsidize it to keep it going.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia provides vital information quickly. subsidizing it guarantees that this can continue.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia puts a world of information at our fingertips

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia relies too much on the people to pay for them and risk shutting down each year

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia serves a great purpose and is very valuable

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia shoud be independent and with subsidization this may be at risk depending on the subsidization source

We should subsidize Wikipedia

government subsidies open the door to government control, this would potentially ruin the impartiality of wikipedia

wikipedia should aim to be a neutral source; public funding would help this goal by making it a public good.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia should be financed different ways

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia should be left as is. once we pour money into it, we lose the authenticity.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia should be self funding as the company has access to the resources it needs without subsidies

We should subsidize Wikipedia

If Wikipedia were subsidized it would be less objective by being accountable to a single funding source.

wikipedia should be subsidized as it a valuable educational tool.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia should be subsidized as it is a collected world-wide encyclopedia for all people to gain knowledge

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia should be subsidized as it is an important free source of information for all.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia should be subsidized because it is a great place for cultural iconography to continue to be added to from many different people.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia should be subsidized because it shares a wealth of information that can help people learn and grow, without subsidization it might go away

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia should be subsidized because of how easy it is to use it

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia should not be subsidized as it is easily manipulated to contain incorrect information which can spread quickly and not accurate

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia should not be subsidized as it is not legislated and therefore is not a legitimate reference point. anyone can update wiki and so it should not be subsidized as a legitimate reference.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia shouldn't be subsidized because the information isn't all that reliable

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia struggles to get donations and we cannot afford to lose such a vast source of information.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia subsidizing will engage more people to create content and to make it more widely available

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia supplies valuable information in a moment's notice.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia will be able to get rid of their yearly donation begging if they get funds from the government.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

A government-funded Wikipedia would become a government-controlled Wikipedia.

Wikipedia will not remain neutral or independent if it receives government subsidies.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

government subsidies open the door to government control, this would potentially ruin the impartiality of wikipedia

wikipedia works fine the way it is already set up.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia would be better if it were controlled by money.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia would be more accurate if it was subsidized.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

wikipedia, more and more, has been shown to be a source of relatively unbiased information.

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is the internet's greatest repository of knowledge and should be publicly supported in order to continue its mission.

wikipedia's only flaw as an unrivalled source of information is the lack of paid staff to ensure all articles are accurate, a subsidy could make it the most impressive free encyclopedia we have ever known

We should subsidize Wikipedia

wikipedia is a valuable resource used by many around the world. it is an important source of knowledge that should be subsidized to ensure it remains free for all to use.

will allow more men to become priests and help with the shortage of priests.

The vow of celibacy should be abandoned

the vow of celibacy should be abandoned because it represents a major barrier to men considering entering the priesthood

will be the best possible solution for the person prosecuted, according to the particular circumstances of the case

The use of public defenders should be mandatory

public defenders should be mandatory because they can provide free legal representation to those who are accused

will help eliminate gender discrimination

We should adopt gender-neutral language

adopting a gender neutral language enables us to speak to each other in a more compassionate and understanding way.

will help insure that everyone is treat equally.

We should adopt gender-neutral language

adopting a gender neutral language enables us to speak to each other in a more compassionate and understanding way.

will increase the capture and conviction of criminals

Entrapment should be legalized

entrapment should be legalized because sometimes this tactic is the only way to apprehend repeat offenders.

will lead to an increase in copycat products

We should abolish intellectual property rights

intellectual property rights are so important in that they don't allow someone to just steal someone else's ideas and creations for their own benefit.

will lead to an increase in impaired drivers

We should legalize cannabis

there are many arguments, including it will save money as enforcement of current laws costs an estimated $8 billion a year in the u.s. alone and will cut down on a lot of crime

will lead to confusion and misunderstangings

We should adopt gender-neutral language

gender-neutral language shouldn't be adopted because in writing consistency is sometimes hard to keep straight with those pronouns

with a austerity regime necessary programs could lose or at least have hefty cuts to their programs.

We should adopt an austerity regime

an austerity regime hurts the poorest in our society

with a growing population and more people wanting to eat meat, factory farming is the only solution.

We should ban factory farming

factory farming is not humane for the animals and should be banned.

with a help for wikipedia, this can improve in many ways

We should subsidize Wikipedia

Wikipedia could provide information on more topics and in more languages if it were subsidized.

with a multi party system it can be harder for a party to win outright

We should adopt a multi-party system

the multi-party system offers voters more choices that may get more people involved in politics

with a multi party system voters will have more of a choice

We should adopt a multi-party system

the multi-party system offers voters more choices that may get more people involved in politics

with a multi-party system, it would be easier for a party with radical views to come intro power, resulting in reforms that could be disastrous.

We should adopt a multi-party system

the multi-party system offers voters more choices that may get more people involved in politics

with a standardized curriculum, homeschooling is as viable a method as regular schooling. it can allow a learning atmosphere for children who would otherwise not be able to attend school, for various reasons.

Homeschooling should be banned

homeschooling is best for children where the schools in the area are not conducive to learning