text stringlengths 1 299k | label stringclasses 4 values | lang stringclasses 2 values |
|---|---|---|
A gentle reminder! | toxic | en |
== AWW WHAT A LEGENDDDDD!! Kris you fluffed up fluff face=] ==
AWW WHAT A LEGENDDDDD!! Kris you fluffed up fluff face=] | toxic | en |
Can I changed the red in the photo with the red that I think it is better? 14:11, 29 December 2013 (UTC | toxic | en |
Teach me apps da. When you come to college. | scam | en |
, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Queen Nefertiti of Egypt was a native of Mitanni. The Mittani Kingdom of Armenia was an off-shoot of the Hurrian kingdom. The Hurri and the Mittani in turn were the contemporaries the Hittites and the Hykos, within whom they shared many cultural and political aspects. Today, all these aforementioned nations are considered to be, in varying degrees, proto-Armenians, that is, we modern day Armenians are direct descendants of the remnants of those ancient tribes. 20:28 | toxic | en |
Re: [ILUG] Using Normal IDE Device with a Dell Latitude CPx laptop
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 11:38:00PM +0100, Vincent Cunniffe mentioned:
> There is absolutely no way to use a conventional 3.5" drive with a
> laptop directly. However, you can get an external firewire or USB
> cradle and attach it to the laptop like that, and any 3.5" drive
> will work in that case.
Ah, they told me that about my A1200. Just got a video box, cut air holes
and a hole for the cables, then got an extra-long 2.5" to 3.5" IDE cable,
and connected it up. Had to make a few holes in the A1200 case for the
IDE cable too.
Worked a charm. Until I dropped the disk one day onto concrete.
Kate
--
Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug@linux.ie
http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for (un)subscription information.
List maintainer: listmaster@linux.ie
| scam | en |
Sorry, I cannot. Homework. | toxic | en |
::Yeah, there are lots of objectivist sites on the web, so a google search would skew results towards description of Rand as a philosopher.
:::Shermer in his piece on Objectivist Cultism referes to her as novelist-philospher http://www.2think.org/02_2_she.shtml
:::I could check Tibor Machan's memoir, he knew Rand and is a libertarian. He very likely considers Rand a philospher and is a PhD in philosphy. I'll get the info and post back what I find.
: | toxic | en |
Copyright Notice
The text of this pageis available for modification and reuse under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License and the GNU Free Documentation License.
You are free:
- to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work, and
- to Remix — to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
- Attribution — You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work.) You must maintain a link to this article (
- Share Alike — If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same, similar or a compatible license. | toxic | en |
|decline=Please provide contact information for administrators at your school who will discipline the vandals appropriately and ensure no more vandalism occurs from this address. — | toxic | en |
"
She's been primarily going by ""Winters"" ever since first marrying Malcolm. I think I've seen her credited as ""Dr. Olivia Hastings Winters"" but, am not positive about that. " | toxic | en |
"
:I have already asked you to stop altering archives. Rather than revert you again and block you I am going to give you a chance to revert yourself. Not only is it not allowed to modify archives it is unclear if this user was actually a sock. " | toxic | en |
NARS, SnePS and polyscheme seem to be among the more advanced projects not yet listed on this page. | toxic | en |
"
== Tallest buildings in Providence ==
Hey - thank you for your support of this list to reach Featured status. Just wanted to let you know, that since you have posted your Support in the opinion box, a talk page consensus has been reached to remove all opinion boxes from every entry, therefore removing your Support. So, if you are still in support, it would be great if you could write it in the discussion area. Thank you,
== Detroit People Mover ==
I left my comments beneath yours on the article page.
== Chicago Meetup ==
I am not sure if you live in Chicagoland, but I see you have edited Chicago quite a bit. If you are not from Chicago I apologize for the following message. A Chicago Meetup has been scheduled. I hope the time and place are convenient. Your reply would be appreciated. ///tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM)
:Nope, I live on the East Coast.
== comments from the move request ==
*Strong Oppose ""City, State"" is a standard US convention for identifying any city and seems well established in Wikipedia. The more exceptions, the harder it is to deal with the process and the ore cross-checking is needed. Furthermore, while the cities proposed for this move are often known by city name alone, not all of them are unique city names. Determining that the non-unique name in one state is so impressivley prominent as to trump any other use of the name in another state seems to me to rather subjective and not appropriate for the Wikipedia.
**Comment And yet we've already done it for all these places by having the base page redirect to them.
*** Good point, but reason does not seem to affect them.
== Re: SineBot ==
Hi there. got your barnstar, but he is sadly too busy as of late to send you a reply, so he told me, his personal slave, to send you one instead. He says thanks, and he wishes you the best. Cheers. )
== Linkspamming ==
The Maddox linkspam has been removed from the E90 article. Folks have been blocked for spamming iPhone and E90 articles with it, please refrain from re-adding it. Yes, Maddox is great and funny, but the link doesn't make the article better. -
:See also: WP:AGF
::What does AGF have to do with my request? -
==Tendtentious editing==
The linkspamming issue on the Nokia page is reaching the point of disruption. Please reconsider. -
== Try taking this objectively==
The disruption you accuse me of can only go on as long as engages me for it. Only once have I posted without it being a direct response to that editor. I assure you that I do not continue my argument for the sake of ego, proving anyone wrong, or disrpution, but because I sincerely believe that this change will improve the article to those who read it.
:I'm absolutely certain you do, I'm not accusing you of editing in bad faith. But your insistence is bordering on disruption, hence my gentle suggestion that you reconsider. You don't believe me, and that's fine, perhaps you should request external comment. I think Wibble is arguing from a point supported by policy and our style guide, and you aren't, but you're welcome to seek out another opinion. If we all agreed all the time, it'd be boring. One thing that puzzles me is the subject of your message, where does objectivity come in? You didn't mention it in your message, seems a bit like a stinky fish. -
== maddox & nokia phone ==
I think you'll find that I found a pretty solid precede | toxic | en |
"! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Talk • Contribs • Spread the love!
|}
{| width=""100%"" style=""background-color:#F5FFFA;""
|style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""|
Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips
Where to ask questions or make comments
Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources
Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research
What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons
Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry
Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy
External links • Spam • Vandalism
Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability
|class=""MainPageBG"" style=""width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top""|
{| width=""100%"" cellpadding=""0"" cellspacing=""5"" style=""vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA""
! The community
|-
|style=""color:#000""|
Build consensus • Resolve disputes
Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette
No personal attacks • No legal threats
Community Portal • Village pump
Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
|-
! | toxic | en |
Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.- | toxic | en |
" 2006 (UTC)
I agree, the page should have less about Poincare and relativity. It can all go on other pages, perhaps in the ""history of relativity"". 05:14, 2 March" | toxic | en |
@Hovaa_ what about yellow spots? | toxic | en |
::::I think too much has been cut out of the intro. A good intro will summarize the entire article, and neither leave holes nor provide undue space to any one section of the article. The intro will also need to provide a brief answer to the main question on a reader's mind about the subjectin this case, that question is, what is different between the LDS Church and other Christianity?, which is not really discussed here. In addition, compared to other subjects, the intro spends far too much time on the church's extra-Biblical canon, as well as its priesthood structure. We either need to strip these subjects or balance them with other summary content from the article. I would prefer a little of both. | toxic | en |
Re: DataPower announces XML-in-silicon
On 27 Aug 2002 at 15:00, Rohit Khare wrote:
>
> DATAPOWER TECHNOLOGY ON Monday unveiled its network device
> designed specifically to process XML data. Unlike competing
> solutions that process XML data in software, DataPower's
> device processes the data in hardware -- a technology
> achievement that provides greater performance, according to
> company officials.
>
Sarvega seems to have a similar product. http://www.sarvega.com.
| scam | en |
Tiny out here looking like an albino red nose pitbull from a dope boy's trap house. | toxic | en |
Had Edward VIII not abdicated, he may well have died before 1972 - and Prince Albert, Duke of York (George VI) may have lived much longer due to not having the stress of being King during WWII. Therefore, if Edward VIII was indeed incapable of fathering children, and died in say the 1950s, he would have been succeeded by his younger brother Prince Albert, who would have become George VI anyway...only much later. When he died, say, in the 1960s-80s, presuming he had no sons (only Elizabeth and Margaret), Elizabeth would then have still become Elizabeth II. However, it is very questionable whether she would have married Prince Philip of Greece had her father not been King in 1947; therefore, she may have had either different children, or no children. In the latter scenario, all other things being equal, the present Duke of Gloucester would almost certainly be King Richard IV right now. | toxic | en |
Many items such as bananas, pineapples, melons, corn, and tomatoes exported to Australia, are laced with over 3000 times the permitted level of pesticides, herbicides and chemicals. Such items are being rejected by the public in Australia. What's more the locally grown Bananas and pineapples are unable to compete in the sales prices from imported stocks (R Sperring) | toxic | en |
", 31 May 2007 (UTC)
I don't mean to argue about it, really, but I just found it exceedingly strange and tried to propose a compromise that catered to both parties. I do recall a part in ""The Secret Life . . ."" where a doctor put him so unlaughably high on the BP scale that he was very concerned, and that would certainly be a sourced counterargument. I'll look into it and see if it has merit. If not, I'm sure that he'll clarify it sometime in the future. 05:21" | toxic | en |
Huh means computational science... Y they like dat one push here n there... | scam | en |
"
== A barnstar for you! ==
{| style=""background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;""
|rowspan=""2"" style=""vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;"" |
|style=""font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;"" | The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
|-
|style=""vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;"" | Nice work on the TAFI logo. •
|}" | toxic | en |
"
The debate appears to be skewed.
It is true that geological studies show changes of the environment that contradicts the strong Gaia hypothesis of ecosystems working towards an optimum state. It is also true that there is evidence that ecosystems have collapsed from within. However, the frequency of such ecosystem collapses through geological history is many orders of magnitude lower than the extremely high frequency predicted by the Malthusian model of maximum reproduction. So evolution must be driven by something other than maximization of reproduction. The selfish gene model (the theoretical mechanism basis of the Medea hypothesis of life destroying itself) appears to be supported by simple computer simulations, but so does strong Gaia hypothesis. The strong Gaia hypothesis failed scale-up to more complex systems, and the missing frequency of Medean ecosystem collapses can be explained if the selfish gene model also fails scale-up to the greater complexity of real life because real life is too complex to be livable to such rigid, unselfcritical entities as the selfish gene model claims that living organisms are. In other words, the selfish gene model is based on the same methodological error as is the strong Gaia hypothesis. This is explained in greater detail on the pages ""Moderating the Gaia/Medea debate"" and ""Self-organization"" on Pure science Wiki, a wiki devoted to the scientific method unaffected by academic prestige obsession.
95.209.61.52 Martin J Sallberg" | toxic | en |
rawhide presentation
louise - this is an update to the earlier version of the rawhide presentation sent to you by brenda . please note that some ownership numbers have been adjusted in the asset summary section . | scam | en |
I'm surprised that you're having trouble finding reliable sources containing her birth name. It took ne 10 seconds to find the Guardian article (cited) which talks at length about her birth name. I see articles in the Telegraph, The Daily Mail (she's apparently suing the Mail for claiming Jack is not her 'real' name - sound trivial?), The Independent, Pink News and... in pieces (plural) her own website. The subject seems to think it's relevant but you don't? How odd. It's staying unless arbitration says otherwise. 82.41.251.96 | toxic | en |
Action Game
There was also an Action Game version which isn't mentioned anywhere on English Wikipedia:
| toxic | en |
Did everyone else's parents use to refer to the Power Puff Girls as "Powder Puff Girls", or were mine just exceptionally retarded? | toxic | en |
== Thank You ! ==
Dear Wily. Thanks for importing the picture to Trooping the Colour. I think you will be pleased with the use to which it is put. I am considering two other articles (both short and relatively uncomplicated), which will need an image or 2, and will contact you again in due course. Many thanks again. | toxic | en |
"
::There's no policy or guideline on this. Right now people searching on Clannad could be searching for the band or the novel. ♦
" | toxic | en |
DO YOU KNOW WHAT FACTS ARE? | toxic | en |
she really has her fingers in bloody everything | adult_sexism | en |
daaamn my kinda bird son she be on it like brine on rice sanz | adult_sexism | en |
REDIRECT Talk:Confidence tricks in movies and television | toxic | en |
SupportI think that BlackHawk has always been their name so I would use that name too. 02:13 PM, 8 October 2008 (UTC) | toxic | en |
"So do I but he's not here right now, so I can get away with it" "I knew a pretty girl like you is taken" "Oh shit! You too?!" "Whoa hold up, we just meet and your telling me your relationship problems?" | adult_sexism | en |
Newer health study
http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/15/4/1416/pdf This newer study seems to list human health effects that should be included. | toxic | en |
75.70.221.14 is the IP of Chance Trahan of IsAnybodyDown?. Read this. Previously blocked for legal threats among other things. Seems like an unpleasant fellow all around. Someone should probably just hard block that IP. 209.97.203.60 | toxic | en |
How much coke did Charlie sheen do?.. Enough to kill two and a half men I guess | toxic | en |
"
Also the statistic: ""Hearing loss. Of individuals 75 and older, 48% of men and 37% of women encounter difficulties in hearing. Of the 26.7 million people over age 50 with a hearing impairment, only one in seven uses a hearing aid""- Which country exactly is this? " | toxic | en |
Image question
In addition to everything I have been doing lately, i'm also trying to clear up some theatre image copyrights and such. I have noticed a number of images that are loaded to both Wikipedia and the Commons. When this occurs, isn't it usually common to delete the image on Wikipedia in favour of the Commons images or did I dream that? Thanks, as always!
P.S. I just finished reading your ballon article. How marvelous it is and so wonderfully illustrated! You are truly a valuable asset to Wikipedia and all of us who dwell in ivory towers. | Dialogue? | toxic | en |
"
:The section currently initially titled ""Intro"", currently titled ""Dispute"" (unless it gets renamed again) was a direct reply to the announcement of the survey, disputing my assertion that there was a need for a survey: Since ""Dispute"" did not sufficiently describe the content of the section, I re-named it to ""Is there a dispute?"", based on the first sentence RJII had written: ""Is there even much of a dispute about the intro?"" After it became clear that people were actually responding to RJII's objections and that a productive discussion was taking place, RJII took the extra step of re-arranging the sections so that the disucssion no longer made sense. I now have the opinion that disrupting discussion of this article is 's explicit intent. " | toxic | en |
People of old thinkings are moving towards Education. | toxic | en |
Last Warning
Welcome to wikipedia your comments to a recent talk page has been ruled as garbage. If you do it one more time you will be blocked from editing. | toxic | en |
"
Speedy deletion of Will berardelli
A tag has been placed on Will berardelli requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or ""db"" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. " | toxic | en |
MfD nomination of User:Nir.bd
. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nir.bd and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of (t • c) | toxic | en |
"::::::""Forthcoming book
A trio of LDS scholars have been funded by the LDS church to write a book, Tragedy at Mountain Meadows, to be published by the Oxford University Press:
Ronald W. Walker (BYU Professor of History),
Richard E. Turley Jr. (managing director of the Family and Church History Department of the Church), and Glen M. Leonard (director of the Church's Museum of Church History and Art).
The three were granted access to documents in the LDS Church archives. According to Turley, a file in the archives confirms that Lee was acting on his own. The file included the notes of a Mormon historian who, at the request of Church leaders, conducted a confidential investigation of the massacre in 1892. Turley said, ""There are very candid statements on the part of participants to a Church official under the agreement of confidentiality.""
While the trio found additional evidence of church leaders' culpability, Turley stated that ""Utahns elsewhere in the territory acted to preserve the lives of other troublesome immigrants . . . Unfortunately, the militia and church leaders of Iron County made different decisions, and their acts demand the strongest condemnation . . . Circumstance may explain their acts; nothing can justify them.""
The new sources the co-authors are using will be made public once their book is published. Turley said although the church is cooperating and is funding the research, the work is ""not a Church commission""; ""The idea to do the book was ours, not theirs."" Publication apparently has been delayed as the co-authors have tried to be as thorough in their research as possible. According to Turley, LDS leaders share the authors' desire to bring all available evidence out in the open. First drafts of the book will be circulated for comment among LDS and non-LDS parties, including historians and descendants of the perpetrators and victims. ""Open, candid evaluation of that tragedy can produce catharsis, a cleansing spiritual renewal and healing,"" Turley said, adding that the authors will ""present the evidence as we find it - honestly, openly and candidly.""
The above is hardly an example of a brief description, and is far greater than the longest has ever been for the Franz books. I have put back a smaller concise, neutral description that should keep all happy. Posted Central 10 July 2005
" | toxic | en |
"
This new link also clearly states that ""Guzman created the Cal Poly Wiki Project to help promote and distinguish Cal Poly Pomona from other Universities also featured on Wikipedia.org."" " | toxic | en |
He sure took her for a ride. 😁 | adult_sexism | en |
Oh, yeah, I forgot about that. I'll take another look over the article and then head back to talk/DYK. (talk ⋅ contribs) | toxic | en |
"needed, and the Minor char. one would fail notability. As for the other three, Edward and Bella fit WP:N. Jacob...I didn't merge because he's considered one of the main love-triangle characters and there's a possiblity that more info. will be available. If nothing comes up, the page will end up merged eventually. Right now, no one has really attempted to clean up the articles, but they are not in really bad shape compared to others. Bella Swan has a nice sized concept/creation section and a large reception section. Edward Cullen (Twilight), though lacking concept/creation and reception notes, has a large Film Portrayal secrtion. Jacob Black really needs work, though. Personally, I'd like people to work on the actual list. It needs reception and concept/creation notes, not to mention referencing from books and dialogue.
Nah, I don't think so. Stephenie Meyer realistically spends too much time writing about how gorgeous Edward looks (seriously), and even if she had described her characters in more detail, all the character articles would be classified as stubs. There's really no need for so many stubs when we can condense them all into fewer pages.
The Olympic Coven
In the back of Breaking Dawn, where notes on all mentioned covens are writen, the Cullens' information is under 'Olympic Coven' should this be mentioned anywhere?
Delete ""if published"" (paragraph 2, sentence 2)
Go to ""June 2008 Update"" —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk • contribs)
Meyer announced that the book was on hold after that June update, in August 2008. (talk)
Criticism
Would this be a valid source for criticism? blastmagazine.com
The columnist analyzes the Twilight series and calls into question the books' overall writing issues, story and character development, and controversies in how it presents gender roles and how those could negatively affect the young fanbase. I know the source is a blog, but if the writer (Kellen Rice) had credentials that made her article valid, would it be a good source? I can't seem to find her credentials, though, so any help would be appreciated.
Twilight explicitly described as 'porn'
Something to the effect of the frequently surfacing description of Twilight as ""softcore porn"", ""girl porn"", and similar should be added to the section on critical reception. 78.34.180.107
I disagree that the opinion of one person who writes for a school newspaper is worth noting. (talk)
And I presume you're googling your fingertips off trying to find another source for the claim. 78.34.132.44
Harry Potter versus Twilight
A passionate debate has raged online and in many teen circles about which is the ""better"" fantasy book series: Harry Potter or Twilight. Team Read, an after-school literacy program in Seattle, recently conducted a student debate where two teams hashed it out. Afterward, a panel of judges and the standing-room-only audience voted 120-40 that the Harry Potter had won the debate. In a separate vote not related to the deba | toxic | en |
"
Removed edit
Hi William, I Changed ""19"" to ""17"" because it did not correspond to the date on the side bar." | toxic | en |
"
Adoption offer
Hello, St3p41! I see that you are looking for an adopter; I would be happy to mentor you. I've been on Wikipedia about a year and a half, have ~7800 edits, and on a real-life note, love playing soccer. I'm sure I would enjoy answering your questions and teaching you the ropes around here. You can leave a note here or on my talk page with your reply. Cheers, royal court " | toxic | en |
"
:The tone of the introduction seems to reflect an unwillingness to accept that Intelligent Design scientists EXIST within the scientific community. There are a handful of scientists who are ID proponents - you can pretty much count them without running out of fingers. There are probably quite a few more who are sympathetic to the idea. But no one is actually using ID in science. They're a real political presence, yes, but they aren't using ID in their scientific endeavours. So, as far as the ""science"" of ID, they don't exist. We have a separate intelligent design movement article that deals with the political movement. This article is about the so-called science of ID.
:How would you propose we change this article? What sources are we missing, or are we misrepresenting? It isn't really about our opinions - it's about representing sources in a balanced fashion. What do you suggest we change? " | toxic | en |
Big oversimplification IMO. Is the woman's goal to prevent you from scoring at all costs? | adult_sexism | en |
Charles Bigot didnt exist. Charles Wirgman and George Bigot were the two famous cartoon artist that arrived in that time, so they mixed up the names. Someone should check who of them was the one to make the drawing of the 'people-monkeys' at rokumekain and correct it. | toxic | en |
==Equipment levels and number of aircraft==
Numbers are now considerably lower than in World Air Forces 2013, published by Flight Global;
World Air Foces 2014 lists:
Combat aircraft
MiG-21: 54
MiG-23: 95
MiG-25: 2
MiG-29: 20
Su-22: 45
Su-24: 19
Combat helicopters:
Ka-28: 2
Mi-2: 13
Mi-8/17: 52
Mi-14: 12
Mi-25: 28
SA342: 62
Training aircraft/helicopters
L-39: 66 | toxic | en |
The provided link is blank for me? | toxic | en |
"
== NPWatcher welcome ==
You've been approved to use . Please give me any feature requests or bugs. I'm also happy to help if you have any problems running the program, or any questions ). Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if I've made a new release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Finally, enjoy! " | toxic | en |
Blocked.
Your account has been permanently blocked from editing Wikipedia. | toxic | en |
Really not true, you can say most women that can't get a guy to stay committed that they really want lack girl game, and lots lack girl game. | adult_sexism | en |
::::::Oh (gives a sheepish look), so stupid of me. Unlock it, it won't hurt anyone. (Changing the subject) See if one starts shooting off the lips (Indian vs international) we have others violating tpgs. | toxic | en |
"
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Shadow " | toxic | en |
re : referral
can you advise as to whether or not li xiao referred alex to you last
summer . i need to know this in order to process
an employee referral ( under old plan ) for her .
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by linda vargo / hou / ect on 02 / 14 / 2000 02 : 39
pm - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
li xiao @ enron
02 / 14 / 2000 11 : 19 am
to : linda vargo / hou / ect @ ect
cc :
subject : re : referral
hi , linda ,
i wonder if you heard from vince kaminski regarding my referral for alex
huang .
thanks ,
li x 39635
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - forwarded by li xiao / corp / enron on 02 / 14 / 2000 11 : 12 am
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
linda vargo @ ect
01 / 17 / 2000 04 : 29 pm
to : li xiao / enron _ development @ enron _ development
cc :
subject : re : referral
i am waiting for feedback from vince kaminsky . as soon as i know something ,
i will advise . | scam | en |
REDIRECT Talk:Rough-bellied day gecko | toxic | en |
"
== Country creation lists ==
Yeah that's a quandry. It should be one list. No doubt about that. But what should it be labeled? Independence doesn't quite work since I know that in the case of Egypt, it has been non-independent on and off over time. But then is it a ""State"". I dunno. I would recommend combining everything into one list and then try to build a consensus for the name. Otherwise yes, the countries listed are almost the exact same. It's redundant.
== Ingrid Ragvaldsdotter and Jarl Knut Haakonsson ==
Hello!
Unless I am mistaken, you have written on Norwegian medieval topics before? I was wondering if I could direct your attention to the discussion-pages of the two articles Jarl Knut Haakonsson and Ingrid Ragvaldsdotter, and see if you have any opinions on the question of moving them to Knut Haakonsson and Ingrid Ragnvaldsdotter? Thank you!
:Answered on those pages.
== Shetland ==
I popped some figures on the talk page to show you why the claim you are inserting doesn't make sense.
== Nearest railway station to Shetland ==
Sorry, but you've been taken in by an urban myth, just as that webpage has... It is approx 220 miles from Shetland to Bergen, but it is only approx 130 miles to the railway station at Thurso (Thurso railway station) on the Scottish mainland. I'm going to revert your edit, thanks/
:I prefer to keep discussions about particular articles on the talk page of that article. I have answered there.
== Sorry ==
I gather from your last post at Talk:Shetland you were put out by being corrected on the Lerwick error. I want to say that it was certainly not my intention to offend you.
:Thank you.
::Correcting mistakes is of course important and I am not put out by being corrected. But the manor by which it its done matters a great deal, espeshially when we are limited to communicate by writing. Calling well sourced posts rubbish and making jokes on how silly a mistake this was to make is not encouraging. It might pass better among a group of friends face to face, but should be avoided here. I see you were only enticed into making a small comment and I get the impression you know what Im trying to say here already. It really isnt a big deal or problem.
::My other point is that the problem wasn't me posting it the problem is that a reputable reference site ment to inform Brits and Norwegians on such things have gotten it wrong.
:::Civility is really important on a project like this, which is why I apologised above for any upset you suffered for your well-meaning attempt to improve the encyclopedia. I would make two observations here:
:::1) While verifiability is our standard here, it's obviously even more important to be accurate. Even apparently-respectable sources can be wrong, and as I pointed out on the talk page, this is the organisation that produced the Dodgy Dossier here!
:::2) You perhaps didn't help the situation by reverting our attempts to correct you rather than raising it in talk.
:::Anyway, I do understand why you were put out and I hope no lasting ill feeling will derive from this incident. Best wishes,
::::1) Obviously, but I don't suspect you make a habit of questioning such sources as hard as others. (I would call the British Foreign Office a straight forward respectable source even though some parts of that organisation have made some widely publicised mistakes.)
::::2)Perhaps. I normally only revert once in cases like this (the removing editor referred to himself believing it to be a myth, when I had read it in a reputable source) and then take it to the talk page, but then the following edit summary was ""no mention of that on the ref you provided"". I knew that to be completely false and felt justified in making a second revert. I would however have taken it to the talk page had you not beaten me to it. When a possible mistake is backed up by a strong source maybe all parties share the obligation to take it to the talk page early (maybe even before it is removed the first time?).
::::I don't harbour grudges and I don't think any are justified here:) Cheers! [ | toxic | en |
The miserable Jew is going all over our planet to make people believe they are Jews by fraud. But no one wants to be labelled a Jew, including the Aryan Kashmiri,. | toxic | en |
More botheration, re:Open access publishing
Since you were the admin involved in an original move, I was hoping you could help me figure out cleanup on the articles Open access publishing and Open access (publishing). You originally moved publishing to (publishing), but both articles still exist with substantially the same content, although subsequent edits have forked the content a bit. Should Open access publishing be redirected to Open access (publishing), as seems was your intent, or is there something more subtle going on here?
This is separate from the main Open access article, which Open access (publishing) appears to think it is, based on the hat note. And the Open access (disambiguation) dab page doesn't refer to either of the two publishing articles. At this point, I'm rather confused about what is intended to go where. | toxic | en |
"
This is an encyclopedia. In articles about books, we have plot summaries. That is not going to change. What we are discussing is the use of a current fiction tag. said " | toxic | en |
I was just at the band's website and it said they are active, not dissolved | toxic | en |
This version is the origional, leave it like it is now, do not change it from the good version, or you will be blocked! | toxic | en |
Blocked for a month. My only question is should it have been longer. (talk · contribs) | toxic | en |
::::::::::I'm agree with you, and the Info Box seems perfect like this to me. | toxic | en |
"
Disagree. As James said, ""Room 101"" stands on its own, especially in popular culture. It's an 'idea' known by many, even if they do not recognize it as coming from 1984, let alone the Ministry of Love. " | toxic | en |
I hate when I see a nigga come /this close ð/ to saying women need to stick to our roles, but then adds just a pinch of feminist bullshit in a cucked attempt to not look "sexist". | adult_sexism | en |
I'm sorry but I literally don't understand why this is being blocked. Big Law Entertainment is a company (just like any other production company) that has a history and a purpose. So I am honestly confused as to how a entertainment/music production company like Bad Boy Records can have a Wikipedia page but I cannot have a Wikipedia page. I am literally looking for specific guidance and not a standard answer. Please write back to explain to me what I specifically can do (change wording, remove certain phrases, change the username, etc.) to get this page unblocked.
Thank you! | toxic | en |
hi. please leave us a message. i think we created an article about us in the context of long island before but maybe it was deleted because it seemed like spam? can you just like, let us know before you do that? we are trying to help out. thanks. -sean at kempleton do t c o m | toxic | en |
Penguins love Antarctica | toxic | en |
"
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Rush Limbaugh. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. 79 " | toxic | en |
Hello, Mainebackdoc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for .
I notice that one of the first articles you have edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been reverted for this very reason.
To reduce the chances of deletion, you might like to draft your article before submission, then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. To start creating a draft article, just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit that page as you would any other. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.
The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing.
If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! You can also just type on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
*The five pillars of Wikipedia
*How to edit a page
*Help pages
*Tutorial
*How to write a great article
*Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - | toxic | en |
"==References==
An important reference book has been omitted from the list. It is ""Sight and Insight, Life in Lijiang, Baidi, and Yongning"", by Ulli Steltzer, published in China; 2001; ISBN 7-80586-848-4/G. 122. A book of 155 stunning black and white photos of the Naxi and Masao people of Yunnan, it was photographed by this well-known and frequently published photographer of indigenous people in 1995,'97,'99,and 2001. The text adjoining each photo is frequently quoted directly from the person in the photo, and refers to Landscape and Architecture; Agriculture, Food Production and Marketing; Employment and Independent Work; The Young and the Old; Naxi Classical Music; Ritual and Celebration; The Dongha Culture in Lijaing and Baidi; and the Naxi and Masao people of Yongning. The author lived with the people of these villages over the several months during which she took hundreds of photos.
[User: Joelellie] 10:40, 3 May 2015" | toxic | en |
"
Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Wilhelmina Will for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. " | toxic | en |
Yes, well you tried to vandalise it through back passages. I doubt this planw ill work - why don't you go and do something useful? | toxic | en |
I believe this user has done nothing wrong and should be freed of his punishment! | toxic | en |
There is another wrinkle worth noting. The early chroniclers made a big deal of the fact that the man who shot Richard I was not a noble. It was considered a crime in itself that a commoner should kill a noble, much less a king. There is a uncredited story that Richard I ennobled his killer to remove the stigma but he was killed anyway. | toxic | en |
Well, they shouldn't be notable, but Sarah Palin comes from that area of politics that claims an image of wholesome, sweet, traditional family life. Such pollies draw attention to their kids as part of their own image. That's why people notice when things don't quite stay in the mould of the wholesome, sweet, traditional family life. When things are running smoothly, Palin and her supporters would be delighted to have the lives of the children mentioned, but probably not now. I'm happy to move forward to the position that really, what the kids do is irrelevant, or ought to be, but Bonewah and Kelly, you asked. | toxic | en |
"
Now listen to me LUNA
I do not know who you are, your ambitions in life or if you have already acheived them (you do not have a user page you wiki part timer!).
And so to business..
Your recent edits have comprised of ""sand box"" edits to encyclopedic articles, creating pointless articles (it may be true but it is not very informative is it? You have no sources nor have you given any indication that you wish to in the near future.) and edit warring with yourself. Fun Fun Fun... Now you stop this Luna. Soon. " | toxic | en |
partly closed
You are right and wrong: When horsebusses were a major means of public transport, many of them had an open second flour. | toxic | en |
"
April 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Shark, you will be blocked from editing. Talk• Contribs
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices." | toxic | en |
"
Oct 4th 2010 Release Date?
I checked both Amazon and Itunes and don't see it yet. (USA) Is the Oct 4th date for the U.K.? Or has it been changed and does the article need to be updated?
67.190.43.65
It's been released by all sources. I bought my copy from Amazon. ╟─Tag►assemblyman─╢ " | toxic | en |
Charlie Sheen's Video Message to President Obama | toxic | en |
the time of the year m=ch s=gi | toxic | en |
REDIRECT Talk:List of accolades received by the Spider-Man film series | toxic | en |
"
And what are you doing???? you are belittling me and assuming i was belittling him i wasnt but celarly you think i was, and since as you put on that users block denial page that you know aspberger pretty well you are showing you do not, so thanks for the response (talk - contrib) " | toxic | en |
William Buchan father and son
I'm not sure what you are doing with these pages. But redirecting William Buchan, Sr. to Bill Buchan, Sr., which you then blank, makes no sense and I am undoing these edits. Ah, it would have been helpful to create the page as the first edit, or at least use an appropriate edit summary. Anyway, happy editing. | toxic | en |
SPK.LA is not a blog. It is a highly respected electronics and electronics culture news site which employs a multtitude of writers, filmers, industry insiders and persons specialized in the fields of electronics and holds interviews with persons inside the tech world and is given information from companies. In fact it is the largest electronics news site in Mexico and is respected across Latin America. | toxic | en |
Oh, Once upon a time, as most fairy tales begin in English, I thought that you were a neutral and objective editor (never a historian mind you). Please add what ever information you consider relevant to Poland in the article, not in the lead. Would you like to remove your mask and simply categorize the town as a Polish geopgraphical entry? | toxic | en |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.