text stringlengths 1 299k | label stringclasses 4 values | lang stringclasses 2 values |
|---|---|---|
It should also be mentioned that Emagic produced some hardware units of significant merit. Their MIDI interfaces were both comon and extremely stable, the Unitor-8 variants particularly popular. | toxic | en |
"
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Manor. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. " | toxic | en |
== mark hoppus ==
are you calling me a liar? has mark hoppus ever denied his affiliation with nambla? i think this is sick and disgusting and needs to be exposed. im sorry if wikipedia is not the place for it. i apologize, but i do speak the truth. | toxic | en |
I will reach before ten morning | scam | en |
WoW thanks , I will fix up then urls. | toxic | en |
2014 (UTC)
:::I contributed lots to this article in the early wikipedia days and they wouldn't let me get a single one of my versions of the lyrics in, very responsible in retrospect. You can find it in the History. 01:17, 17 September | toxic | en |
Just discovered that the film is in fact uploaded in its entirety on YouTube. [] (The lack on hits compared to the infamous time traveler video is just depressing) I'll watch it tonight. | toxic | en |
|needs-photo = no
|listas = Richards, Ariana | toxic | en |
some of my concerns are that people wouldn't be willing to put their face and information to the things that they write but we all need to start hooking up outside of the internet. | adult_sexism | en |
If Ireland is a foreign country, then so is Scotland (to England and Wales). Sea is no definition of 'country', 'nationality' or 'ethnicity' any more than language. | toxic | en |
Re: SimPastry
In a message dated 7/23/2002 8:45:18 PM, ejw@cse.ucsc.edu writes:
>Pastry is a generic, scalable and efficient substrate for peer-to-peer
>applications. Pastry nodes form a decentralized, self-organizing and
>fault-tolerant overlay network within the Internet.
Is it made with lard, butter, or vegetable shortenings?
http://xent.com/mailman/listinfo/fork
| scam | en |
", 8 July 2008 (UTC)
I agree they would benefit from a common description, which they all shared prior to your edits, all using the term ""state-related"" which was applied by a separate editor in the case of each article and lasting through review for at least 3 years for Temple and 4 years for the Pitt and PSU articles which speaks to Wikipedia:Silence and consensus. Do any of their current regular editors of these pages share the same delight in minutia and precision? I don't know. Wikipedia:WikiProject Pennsylvania State University seems rather dormant at the moment. The Temple article does not have very active editing. However, it is no secret that Pitt is my primary editing interest in wikipedia and I'm extremely concerned in the accuracy of articles relating to Pitt and do not feel it benefits wikipedia to compromise that accuracy because of the content of other articles. However, WP:Consensus is central dogma of wikipedia and the Pitt article should reflect that. 03:21" | toxic | en |
(assuming a futuristic mode of interpretation) | toxic | en |
Indiana lost to Bowling Green. Big Ten continues to be trash. | toxic | en |
WikiProject United States History}}
{{ | toxic | en |
"
American Frontier
–Fur trade
link fur trappers, Platte Valley
beaver and river otter should be linked here rather than later. (T/C//WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR)
–Settlers and pioneers
What does this mean: the western approach of the First Transcontinental Railroad was a ferry ride across the Missouri
Link Independence and clarify its relation to the river.
naturally and ""Had to be"" in para 4 sound POV (T/C//WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) " | toxic | en |
you know - everything about this post is fine except that. She wants a big bearish guy with a good job who wants to do things with her. That's fine. But fat-fit? 5 days a week at the gym? GTFO. | adult_sexism | en |
re : integration meeting
who is comming in on thur
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
sent by mark muller | scam | en |
== MCOTW ==
Do you want to turn around MCOTW? The response on allergy has been appalling. | | toxic | en |
If it redirects here, we must address it on this page. Otherwise we should either have an article for it, or the redirect should be deleted. If the redirect page wasn't protected I'd nominate it for deletion. - | toxic | en |
Source for Image:Alisonbechdel2.jpg
Hi, Tvengela. Someone tagged Image:Alisonbechdel2.jpg as lacking a source, which means it can be deleted in less than a week. They should have let you know by dropping the following template here, but they didn't:
Image source problem with Image:Alisonbechdel2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Alisonbechdel2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after . If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Anyway, if you took the photo yourself (as I would assume), all you need to do is note that on the image page. I hope that you read this, because now that Fun Home is a featured article, I'd like to get it onto the front page, but that won't happen if we don't have at least one freely licensed image in the article! — (talk • contribs) | toxic | en |
When a girl says some shit that catches you of guard and you don't know how to respond to it | adult_sexism | en |
"Kinship of God and man: An attempt to formulate a thorough-going Trinitarian theology, by J.J. Lanier [see ""Trinitarian Idealism,"" pp 135-147, esp. Syllabus II, p 136]
" | toxic | en |
re : eol pricing algorithm
hi bob ,
some comments :
1 . you request enron position after successful market order , but not after limit order - - you may want it after limit order as well to be consistent . i am not clear on how you would use enron position . it is possible that the trading desk will have a target position in mind and they will set bids and offers in such a way as to try to achieve that target position , but this target position probably changes continuously and is not stored anywhere , and without this target position there is nothing to compare actual enron position to . of course , enron position may still provide some insights .
2 . you request bid - mid - ask prices for each trade - - - given that a successful trade may execute later than time of order ( especially for limit orders ) , would you need the evolution or range of bid - mid - ask over this time interval ( time of order to time of execution ) ? also , for failed trades , you may need the evolution or range of bid - mid - ask over the time interval from time of order to time of rejection . this again mainly applies to limit orders , as the time intervals may not be significant for market orders given the speed of execution ( something to check ) .
- - - - - original message - - - - -
from : lee , bob
sent : monday , april 23 , 2001 8 : 33 am
to : kaminski , vince ; shanbhogue , vasant ; barkley , tom
cc : lu , zimin ; huang , alex ; gibner , stinson
subject : eol pricing algorithm
a draft data request for eol data we would use to study p & l patterns for the " george " pricing algorithm is attached for your review .
i would like to send this to andy zipper and jay webb this afternoon .
bob
> | scam | en |
The Brisbane City Council issued the Deen Brothers with a meagre $125 fine for illegal demolition. | toxic | en |
Gianfranco Chiarini
Per user Anthaenara, Gianfranco Chiarini'a Wikipedia article is written with bias and as a promotional. However, the article has been written and re-written several times utlizing references to source the statements. This discussion has been posted so that the article may be read, and so that contributors may make editing suggestions. In the event, we cannot resolve this matter we will seek further advice from the Wikipedia Neutral Point of View Notice Board. | toxic | en |
==Broken link to caburn at 20150106==
The reference number 2, to http://www.caburn.com/resources/downloads/pdfs/sec1.2.pdf is broken today, with server unreachable.
It can be found at http://www.caburn.co.uk/resources/downloads/pdfs/sec1.2.pdf.
Have not edited yet, in case it comes back... | toxic | en |
oasis access needed - enron real time trading
to whom it may concern :
it ' s come to my attention that the srp oasis user id which was being used by enron ' s west hourly trading team has been disabled . holden salisbury , one of our cash traders , spoke with someone in your office about setting up a new id for the real time group . enron power marketing , inc . already has company - wide access to the site ; but the real time group regularly reserves transmission on this oasis site and needs a login name and password of its own .
could you please let me know what information i need to provide to get this set up ? i would greatly appreciate your help in issuing a new real time password as soon as possible , or in directing me to a more appropriate contact .
thank you ,
kate symes
real time trading support
503 - 464 - 3939 | scam | en |
also disambiguation links [] all good. | toxic | en |
"
Attempt to fly the aircraft upside-down?
There's one sentence that seems to lack support: At one point, unable to raise the nose, they attempted to fly the aircraft ""upside-down"".
This implies that the pilots deliberately tried to invert the plane, or at least keep it inverted after an unintended roll. Certainly the aircraft was inverted. But there doesn't seem to be any evidence that the inversion was deliberate. The CVR transcript (which is the only reference cited by this sentence) seems consistent with the notion that the inversion was unintended and that the pilots were trying to right the aircraft.
So unless anyone knows of any citable source saying that the inversion was deliberate, I think this sentence should be changed. Especially because it can be confused with the movie Flight, where, in a similar situation, the pilots do deliberately attempt to invert the aircraft." | toxic | en |
Please use wikiformatting on this page. Why should it matter who formatted the page that way? There is no reason for two pictures on this one subject. Why don't you spend some time addressing the request regarding additional religious use of underclothing. Perhaps because you are trying to prove a point? | toxic | en |
Irrelevant. Your premise is already on women requiring adult supervision. Who removed supervision is not important, but let me assure you it wasn't just Jews. Plenty of thirsty white men happily went along with it to up their chances at getting laid. | adult_sexism | en |
Oppose agree with . | | toxic | en |
"
:::I never said Syriac was an extinct language; don't put words in my mouth. You still have yet to provide any reliable sources that state that Syriac is still spoken in Mount Lebanon. Your assurances mean nothing to mean, and the sources you've cited are garbage. Likewise, calling another editor ""dishonest"" and ""stupid"" is a violation of Wikipedia's code of conduct. Incivility is likely to get you banned from Wikipedia. You are correct, however, that this discussion is quickly going no where. It's become evident that your intent is to use this article as a soapbox. I'll looking into filing an RfC on the issue in the coming days. ← [] " | toxic | en |
Sherlock Holmes of Mytologie
Can you explen us, from witch planet cames Albaners? I think this is mnore importen beacose we know now thate in Serbian mytologie Kosovo is part of Serbia, From serbian mytologie I know thate Albaners camme to Kosovo with some ships, but I diden undertandet from witch planet?- hipi | toxic | en |
"
Many apologies, I didn't realise your talk page was archived. Thomas85753 " | toxic | en |
Well, WP:RS says that articles should use reliable sources that are independent of the subject (i.e. you can't cite the website of the consortium). Besides this, an article of this length should have more than the three sources that are left. Feel free to re-submit it when more sources are added - thanks! (talk!) | toxic | en |
(UTC)
Do you have Millet on your watch list? What do you think of this edit? 17:23, 28 June 2015 | toxic | en |
Not a scholar of antisemitism. | toxic | en |
What do you think?
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=David_Bronstein&diff;=272865118&oldid;=272001018
I chiefly enjoy editing the bio sections and the lead paragraphs, not the chess sections which essentially list dates and accomplishments. I grabbed the first subject, David Bronstein, from your user pageif you have any specific players you would like me to work on next, I'll do them first; if not, I'll just work my way down the list.
P.S. I would have probably finished the article, or started a second article, but the Topa-Kamsky game was disappointingand confusing (why did they switch the colors?)
Your friend in chess, | toxic | en |
== Lexx ==
What episodes list page? | toxic | en |
"
Straw Poll
The purpose of this poll is to gage current consensus as to the members sections of the Beatles infobox. I suggest we list all six ex-Beatles as ""Past Members"", and leave the ""Current Members"" field empty, as the band was dissolved in 1975, and has since not reformed. " | toxic | en |
View History 3rd July
As you can see I have edited it to the correct number of Australian Deaths and have corrected the total deaths in the box and the total deaths in the first section of the article. I think someone already added sources for me because I was not able to do so when I was on my iPad and forgot to do it later. | toxic | en |
"
:::::::I have contacted blog owner to provide PR contact information. But then I am not sure how much time it would take. By that time, this image would be deleted. Do we have any alternative to save this image, in case I do not get any response from blog owner/PR ? Thanks. - " | toxic | en |
"His remarks which OBVIOUSLY ""were explicitly written to insult a person (me) rather than as constructive criticism of specific actions"" and contained no factual justification.
My response contained words and statements that were correctly and appropriately describing (with civil English words) the FACTS in relation to nature of his personal attacks on me.
In my attempt to obtain an apology from him, while Lacking any support against his attack, you decided to label me the transgressor, but not him.
You appear to be very negligent and biased acting in your ""appointed role here???"" to say the least, if not totally malicious.
I contend that your obviously biased behavior should preclude you from further involvement in any ""moral code violation"" disciplinary action, let alone this specific one.
This is for starters in addressing your negative comments about me.
I hope I have I made this point clear to YOU now!
" | toxic | en |
"
:Its not restricted to castle cases, but there is List of defensive gun use incidents that covers a lot of this ground. A ""see also"" link is probably appropriate. " | toxic | en |
Just a quick note, I found the bug after posting this, so please reply there. (Talk) | toxic | en |
Wikipedia is not a forum or chat room. It's an encyclopedia. Cheers, () | toxic | en |
September 2007
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. | toxic | en |
@AustinBurge44 either way both schools are trash 😉 | toxic | en |
REDIRECT Talk:Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura | toxic | en |
The Elites have their own version of Sylville Smith's sister. Destroy the houses where the uneducated hillbillies live " burn they sheeet" | adult_sexism | en |
I and a lot of people give a fuck that we had our genitals mutilated without consent in order to satisfy an Old Testament custom. How do you feel about muslims circumcising women? | adult_sexism | en |
Unsure what you are getting at here. Are you querying the importance rating which is low in terms of the overall need for the project to put effort into improving it. Or are you querying the fact that there is not much information given and the need for the article. If the latter then all of the civil parishes as such are important to have articles in order to build up a picture of the county as the census etc figures are based on civil parishes. Obviously the article needs more detail on the demographics presented in the 2001 census, where it is located, boundaries etc but these would be added when someone finds the time to do it. | toxic | en |
"|}}
You are now blocked for BLP violationsspecifically, for accusing Price, Ward, and Zaborsky of killing Wone. Couching such accusations as ""it's my understanding that..."" or placing them on the talk page are not excuses for accusing living people of homicide.
Your unblock is contingent upon your attesting that you understand Wikipedia's BLP policy and will refrain from such actions in the future.
Contra the advice you received above, BLP issues are not subject to the general cautions against involved administrator action.
Please spend more time reading WP:BLP and related than writing a rebuttal here: your denial that any problem existed is what earned you this block, since blocks are not punitive, but exist to prevent harm. By indicating that you believed you were right, you indicated an unwillingness to cease such defamatory behavior on Wikipedia. " | toxic | en |
":: Issue has been resolved externally by the non-Wikipedia editor ""Apache"". Thanks for having made the enquiry with Elen and for having been constructive in your approach.
" | toxic | en |
january 26 th update
jeff / michelle / ken ,
here is the daily update for the 26 th .
enjoy your weekend !
suzanne
- igsupdate . xls | scam | en |
"
I don't want to start an edit war, so I won't put the Bob and Larry movie back in just yet, but I believe that there is one fundamental difference between The Bob and Larry Movie and Minnesota Cuke and the Quest for Noah's Umbrella: We have actual confirmation from several different sites (just type in ""the bob and larry movie"" into googleyou'll get tons of hits) about the B&L; movie, but we only have a few hints that TQFNU exists. In fact, we don't even know where that title comes from: it is entirely possible that it was made up by somebody on Wikipedia. (Type in ""minnesota cuke and the quest for noah's umbrella"" into googleyou'll only get a couple of hits, almost all of them tracing back to this article.) Oh, and the ""bunch of episodes"" that I was talking about before were some episodes under ""episode platform"" that you deleted. I'm still not sure why they were deleted (I'm sure you had a good reason, but I just can't figure it out.) Also, you recently deleted ""Bumblyburg Superhero 4-Pack"" and ""Complete Silly Song Collection"" from the list of videos. Any reason? By the way, I don't mean for any of this to sound hostile or angry, I'm just trying to figure out what's going on. -) " | toxic | en |
"
Replaceable fair use Image:Maribras.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Maribras.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
Go to the media description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — " | toxic | en |
they are a real band one of the most anticipated bands in all of metal at the moment.
There Album is real It's Now Or Never. comes out on the 27th of march, 2012.
So stop deleting the page when people make one for them!!! | toxic | en |
And here I am on IRC just right now, bothering the overworked admins of toolserver, claiming it's a national security issue that I get sql access yesterday, damnit!. Josh Parris | toxic | en |
If you know Canada you know the United Church is more of a Left wing activist group than the NDP. They supported Justin's 28 year old unaccompanied male 'Syrian refugee' who murdered a 13 year old girl months after arriving in Canada. [URL] | adult_sexism | en |
":::::::::I am not denying being Skoojal because it is pointless and beneath my dignity. If for whatever reason you suspect me of something, I may not be able to convice you otherwise. There is nothing surprising about someone editing articles about gay subjects. I have no idea what else you mean by my ""behaviour.""
" | toxic | en |
"
Barnstar of Awesome
Barnstar of Awesome You are hereby awarded the Barnstar of Awesome for your amazing work adding published reliable sources, neutral and relevant information, clear formatting and beautiful images to the Wikipedia Adventure article on Earth. Keep up the stellar job you're doing. Yay you!
" | toxic | en |
":Have you actually looked at the guideline you're linking to? I suspect not. The New York Times is held to be one of the standards of a reliable source. talk to me
" | toxic | en |
@ChickenColeman if McCoy wasn't trash that's a TD | toxic | en |
"I would remove the cute little kitty and change the tone of your language. You might think it's cute but in reality its condescending to pretty much anyone, especially those who have had their articles deleted. If you are trying to stand on the moral high ground by ""protecting"" Wikipedia's integrity, you might want to consider adjusting the language and image you promote in your communications with other users. " | toxic | en |
:His widow died in 2001. I have just added that fact, along with a link to the death index to prove it. His death and hers were separate. | toxic | en |
Johnuniq and Quietmark,
This is my last response. I do not have a problem with how you handled the discussion page and I appreciate the polite responses. I brought up my PhD in statistics because a contributor thought it would be appropriate to just delete my discussion, so I wanted to know why they felt that was within their purview. Do they hold some higher degree or happen to be an expert in evolutionary theory to whom I should defer? I am not a creationist trying to tear apart evolution, but a scientist trying to scientifically discuss the article. As such, my comments should not be quickly dismissed, but should be answered.
I made the suggestion that there are many verified methods of falsifiability, which have been in either peer-reviewed journal articles or stated by Darwin himself (I believe this post was deleted, but I can provide them and their references to help out this section, btw I can find at least four or five, which is more than are currently listed, but are actually correct). This article listed none of these methods of falsifiability in the section labeled falsifiability.
I don’t want creationism taught in school. One of the methods of falsifiability this article mentions requires a deity. This opens up Pandora’s box. How easily could a creationist say “What’s good for the goose is good for the gander?” If a deity can be used for falsifiability (the cornerstone of a scientific theory), then obviously it is allowed into science. If it is allowed into science, then keeping creationism and ID out is not justifiable. Do not give creationists such an easy target.
Other methods mentioned in the article, I easily disputed using only the definition of falsifiability found at wiki, among other places. While you (in general) have dismissed my claims as being SYN, you could not break the logic used nor provide an argument as to why I might be wrong. This is like shooting fish in a barrel and you are giving creationists the ammo to do so. How much ammo do you want to give them?
Royboy, first the definition of chimera they are using has change from so the definition has already changed, because these exist. Beyond that, evolution does not inherently predict that there are no chimeras as long as the lineage can be traced back and it was advantageous to have say a lion’s head and a horse’s body. And as for the genetic variation being easily verified, how would this be done? Our knowledge of genetic coding is very limited, and is certainly not to the point of finding the small changes that would appear relatively quickly in a population as you are suggesting. The number of microarrays involved would be cost prohibitive and lead large error rates that would only find very large genetic anomalies. Beyond that, reason would dictate that mankind as been relatively the same for a million years, thus these are very slow processes. In fact, I think you could be the first evolutionist I have ever heard, that is suggesting that these are quick processes.
I am playing devil’s advocate, because I have found that it is the best way to truly test the validity of what is being stated and this is the scientific way. Look again at my previous posts (at least the posts that have not been deleted), not only do I say what section needs to be changed and why, but I have “quoted reliable sources that throw doubt on some aspects of the article”. I have no peer-reviewed journal article stating that these methods of falsifiability are wrong because nobody has a peer-reviewed journal article stating that they are correct, so why would anybody argue against a point that hasn’t been made? I may be able to find some creationist webpage, but I don’t want that in the article either. You may be right that I am committing SYN, but these are relatively simple arguments that can easily be made by others. I’m not trying to denigrate evolution, so there would be no point to making an article called “Are objections to evolution valid”. I just want science to prevail. Make arguments strong and scientifically justifiable or they will be used as weapons to attack evolution.
I believe that the section on falsifiability needs to be overhauled and carefully reconsidered, this is the wiki wringer you are mentioning Quietmark, my posts are part of that. I’m not asking it to be overhauled right now, but I think it does need to happen. This, however, I leave to your (collective) judgment. If you would like me to review or help out, I am willing to do so, but only by email or talk. I will not be editing this site or discussion page again. It is my opinion that fair scientific discussion is not prevailing here, as nearly all of my material have been deleted or archived. Sorry it took so long to post this response, a user within this article had me blocked. | toxic | en |
Good shit man. Self respect goes a long way. You know what you want and it's not your job to compromise . | adult_sexism | en |
"
Welcome!
Hello, , and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
*The five pillars of Wikipedia
*How to edit a page
*Help pages
*Tutorial
*How to write a great article
*Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! " | toxic | en |
"
You say you are faithful to Christ's Church. Yet, when someone expressed their religious view, and I reciprocated, you said it was uncalled for? How do you resolve this crisis? You know, in the Eastern Rite liturgy, the priest says, ""Lord, it is fit at all times, it is right at every moment to give honor and praise to your name"". There is never an unfit time to glorify God. Anyways, I give myself too much credit; my only intention was to say that no one on wikipedia is suppose to express their religious views like that on discussion pages - but if they are going to, then so must I. " | toxic | en |
I can work on finding missing info, but can't do it right away. Will try to do so over the next few days. | toxic | en |
(UTC)
This article is superbly written and strikes a perfect balance between what should be in versus what is appropriate to leave out. I very rarely reference Wikipedia as a primary source for teaching purposes but this article is exceptional. The EVM learning resources article on my Web site links to it as of May 2010. 16:24, 27 May 2010 | toxic | en |
I think it should be merged because they are after all the same company - different subsidiary. | toxic | en |
LMMFAO CARNIVAL FREAK THAT'S GOOD AND HOW THIS DEVIANT TRASH MADE IT TO THE WHITE HOUSE I BET IT STILL SMELLS OF YETTI SEX | adult_sexism | en |
REDIRECT Talk:Riazuddin National Center for Physics | toxic | en |
"Before I move on to ""Filming"", I'm just wondering: How can filming begin on April 7 and May 18? Also, how can filming take place in Indiana and Los Angeles at the same time?
" | toxic | en |
Removal of non free images
I removed File:Dr John Zoidberg.png from your userspace. Please look at WP:FAIRUSE. Talk/Contribs/Vote! | toxic | en |
Sharing food with your mangia cake friends because they love your food ItalianProblems | toxic | en |
The Billy the Kid article with my contributions has been vandalized on or about Dec. 14, 2015 by someone calling themselves KrakatoaKatie. What had been the most detailed, and accurate account of Billy the Kid's life has been replaced with pure garbage. I ask every to look at the last version I submitted one concerned and compare it to what it has been replaced with. I ask anyone who is knowledgeable about the subject, and who doesn't have some sort of agenda, to take a look at what has happened and let your feeling be known. Thank you. | toxic | en |
"
{{#ifeq:{μ|μ|Category:Miscellaneous pages for deletion}}
“If you offered to let me off this time on condition that I am not any longer to speak my mind in this search for wisdom, and that if I am caught doing this again I shall die, I should say to you,"" - Socrates, Greek philosopher (470-399 B.C.E.) regarding the freedom of Speech.
Before reading my page
Please do not delete by user page. Please if you desire to delete my personal user page please consider:
• Ethic of reciprocity.
• The work and research that went into it.
• The list of references in bold type.
• All the spell checking & etc.
• The right to freedom of speech and expression.
• The right to seek information and ideas.
• the right to receive information and idea.
• the right to impart information and ideas.
• The right to freedom of religion, & belief.
• Human dignity.
• Be the one to add to the discussion not take away.
• You can edit, and reply to the discussion.
• You can add to discussion, but countering if desired.
• You also are entitled to the above rights, and freedoms.
• If deleted others & I have copies that and the article might only just get bigger and bigger.
• The purpose behind of Wikipedia.
• Previously times others comments have deleted by doing so.
• What feeling oppressed and censored is like.
1. Establish correct text (emendations).
2. Date the text
3. Establish authorship
4. Examine historical\political\social events that may have affected the writing of the text
5. Try to discover a consistent ""school of thought"" that characterizes the writings of this author
• It is not to say modern rabbinic Jewish necessary support these beliefs today.
• This article is not anti-Jewish there many Jewish individuals now, and through history which whom have criticized the Talmud, for whatever reason or just not accept its divinity.
• It is also not to say that Talmud has should or should believe in, that is a personal choice.
• And it is not to say that Talmud has not sometime enhanced our historical understanding, and is a part of Jewish heirtage.
The Talmud: examination & comparison of the biblical doctrine & perspective
The purpose of this article is not attack one's religious beliefs. The purpose is to show why some have found the works of rabbinic oral traditions, and so-called oral law or ""oral torah"" very controversial. And why some have not shared in the belief of being a divine revelation.
The purpose of this article is not attack one's religious beliefs. The purpose is to show why some have found the works of rabbinic oral traditions, and so-called oral law or ""oral torah"" very controversial. And why some have not shared in the belief of being a divine revelation.
The | toxic | en |
"
Kaballah and Tarot
The article implies that Kaballah and Tarot weren't related until the 19th cent. occult movement. I assume that's a reference to the Golden Dawn. Or Papus. But that's more of an assumption than anything. The cards first appeared, albeit in a somewhat different format, at the same time and in the same place as a flowering of non-Jewish interest in Kaballah.
I raise this here because 1) I'm not sure how to correct the article, 2) I'm a newbie and would rather not do harm in an attempt to do good, and 3) I'd like to see if anyone else has strong opinions.
Tarot and Qaballah have a 1 to 1 correspondence, and are almost
certainly paralell descriptions of the same mythic archetypes.
The history presented here is propagandist christian; it assumes
that Tarot was started in Italy, which is patently culturacidal
because the cards are part of pagan European mysticism, and they
did all they could to kill off the pagans.
Italies versions were propagandist toy versions of the original,
copied without an understanding of the meanings and changed to suit
the assumptive interests of the new Italian art culture.
""1 to 1 correspondence"" is one interpretation, but a poor one. Parallels between the Tarot and the Tree of Life have been drawn (Eliphas Levy?), but they do not parallel other components of the Qaballah, such as the texts on Gematria. While many neo-pagans have adopted and adapted the Tarot, I seriously doubt any kind of pagan origins (although I'd love to see evidence for such).
Could you offer any evidence for your statement of a Pagan predevelopment? The ""normal"" knowledge about Tarot cards development in Italy lists various examples of really existing old playing cards called Trionfi and really existent documents which use this word Trionfi.
yes, there is proof that the trionfi cards actually did exist.
No, there isn't proof that this is a verifiable point of origin.
Proof can be very hard to come by in a situation involving cultural
genocide, however, there are a variety of esoteric proofs and even easier to understand basic arguments.
The first of these is the simple question of sociology and anthropology. Okay, if Tarot is a product of Italian culture of that Time period, where out of that culture did those symbols derivate?
The answer is, they didn't and couldn't of, they were obviously
symbols from a system the Italians had no knowledge of.
So YOU say, buddy. Can you please give us some proof that the Italians DIDN'T have any knowledge of tarot symbolism? And what symbolism! Empresses, chariots, the sun... the moon. A tower. All of it stuff with which Italians would have been completely and totally unfamiliar, huh? Vince In Milan
Other ""proofs"" as such hinge on increasingly more esoteric facts,
and, as weak an argument as the above sounds, if you know Tarot, it is a VERY sound argument as one starts to apply the basic principle
per card. The Tarot is OBVIOUSLY a wheel of the year mythic architecture, the Elementalist perspective would have been an anacronism in Italian culture of that time period.
http://www.cafetarot.com/en/history.htm
one side
http://www.tarothermit.com/infosheet.htm
the other side, included for balance, but also to point out
that this article wouldn't exist if somebody didn't have a minority opinion.
http://www.occultforums.com/showpost.php?p=108263&postcount;=24
http://www.geocities.com/astroreports9000/tarot.html
new age noise, but another case of somebody who actually saw
the obvious;
http://www.psychicsahar.com/artman/publish/article_399.shtml
As a side note, Tarot suffered more than its sister system, the Tree
of life, which has also been revisionist histroied to start in the 13th century. Unlike Tarot, the proof of this is patently obvious to any who have studied esoteric judaism. The bibles symbols and images
are based on Qaballah, not the other way around. Everything is derivated in Judaism by virtue of the TREE, including even the hebrew
language.
At the very least, we can show that the Trionfi is not the original Tarot by refering to the Tarot of the Bohemians.
http://www.lulu.com/content/186892
http://www.supertarot.co.uk/thoth/papus.htm
http://www.sacred-texts.com/tarot/tob/tob00.htm
the trail i | toxic | en |
I know Eagles is NOT guilty of this, but other users are guilty of this. | toxic | en |
*Articles that only list a web site address are Candidates for speedy deletion. | toxic | en |
.
That would do, why don't you go to every store that every chain has and figure the national average price on everything, then ignore the wages that their employees make (to be spent at the other business in town, maybe even funding your job), and draw up an addition to the article determining who benefits from shopping where. Let's say Company X has a store, with 500 jobs, paying $10 an hour, then Company W comes in, adds 500 jobs, paying $6 an hour, drives Company X under, now the wages that Company W pays are the ones being spent in the area, guess everyone benefits from a 40% drop in the spending from 500 people's incomes. | toxic | en |
Believe me, I would love to contribute to this system, but my first experience has not been a pleasant one. My first impression is seeing wikipedia as a dictatorship. Thanks | toxic | en |
Talk main page
Hi, I'm not sure how long you've been hanging about talk main page, I seem to remember your sig. But do you remember Template:Main Page discussion header ? We used to have that on there, but people still placed help questions and etc on talk:main page. The general consensus recently was to just not have any warnings or help and just answer people's questions or direct them to where they should be, with out WP:BITEing them. No use in trying to hold back the tide it seems. People 'never' read instructions ;) | toxic | en |
I don't have the source right now, but Wright seems to have played the bass (plus the keyboards) in the John Peel session. For the studio recording, it's more likely Waters on bass. Black Condor | toxic | en |
"
:Actually, ignore that request. I've decided to politely ask the user if they have got me mixed up with someone else, despite the fact that I've been called an ""anti-Semitic"" - whatever one of them are. " | toxic | en |
No problem. This is the first block I actually deserved. | toxic | en |
The title I'm proposing gives us some leyway to use the section to possibly discuss communism's relationship with other movements during the period. Frankly, that's already more than I can comfortablty yield until I see some evidence that any other encyclopedia structures its discussion of communism in the 19th century in the way you are proposing. | Talk | toxic | en |
"
Please be a little more specific about the ""unsourced content"" to which you refer on my talk page. Thanks for your help. " | toxic | en |
Nobody ent, actually I'm still figuring out what happened to my signatura and how come it's no longer clickable. I just clicked the Wikipedia option of mark up language. | toxic | en |
She'd be called a racist, get a lot of threats, and probably lose her job! | adult_sexism | en |
==New Page Triage engagement strategy released==
Hey guys!
I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the initial documentation about the project and also the engagement strategy, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on my talkpage, or in my inbox - .
It's awesome to finally get to start work on this! ). | toxic | en |
Category:Male kings
:Category:Male kings, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. | toxic | en |
"
ok sorry about the spelling issue, changed. talk→ " | toxic | en |
== Source for DOB ==
Does this article have a source that gives the DOB? As this is key factual information it should be sourced.
*
If one of the other sources already gives his DOB, nevermind. - - | toxic | en |
"::::: Don't make assumptions regarding my political views; I could be a Libertarian socialist, I could be an anarchist, I could even be a supporter of the right wing. Without the slightest evidence, you jump to conclusions about others' motives and views. That's not good faith. Furthermore, why is it that none of you Inclusive Democracy people are so hostile to (a) people with views different from yours, (b) people who point out weaknesses in an article? Every wikipedian will immediately tell you that the addition of a tag (wP:NPOV, WP:OWN, you name it) is an invitation for improvement; it's a marker that says ""hey, can anyone help out here and make this article better?"". On the contrary, you get extremely defensive, confrontational and downright rude. If you act as a (self-professed?) representative of Mr. Fotopoulos, you are not portraying him in a good manner. Think about it. And also, drop this ""everyone who is not in my camp is an enemy"" attitude; it's very George W. Bush and totally at odds with a movement that has the term ""Democracy"" in its name.
" | toxic | en |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.