Search is not available for this dataset
text
stringlengths
0
16.2k
Reddit Comment: Trump claims. The president claims. The commander in chief claims. The rest should just be a big blank, save people from repeating whatever the lie is he's claiming. He claims he's a stable genius. Is there anyone outside of his extreme hard core base that believs that to be true?
<|endoftext|>
User:
Reddit Comment: I have been the personal psychiatrist of Ms Elizabeth Warren since 1980. Her previous physician was my father, Dr Sigmund Freud. Over the past 39 years, I am pleased to report that Ms Warren has had no significant psychiatric problems. Ms Warren has had a recent complete psychiatric examination that showed only positive results. Actually, her IQ, 145, and clinical mental assessment were astonishingly excellent.
Over the past twelve months, she has lost at least fifteen bad habits, Ms Warren takes 10 mg of Prozac daily and a low dose of a mood stabilizer. Her HAM-D test score is 0.15 (very low). Her mental strength and stamina are extraordinary.
Ms Warren has suffered no form of addiction, has never had a depressive episode, lobotomy or any other brain surgery. Her only treatment was a counseling session at age ten. Her neurological status is excellent. She has no history of ever using alcohol or tobacco products.
If elected, Ms Warren, I can state unequivocally, will be the sanest individual ever elected to the presidency.
<|endoftext|>
User:
Reddit Comment: I think you misunderstood my comment.
My comment wasn't "Liberals and Right Wingers are the same"
It was "Liberals are basically right-wingers who aren't anywhere near as progressive as they tend to be"
My beef with liberals is that they are right-wing free market loving capitalists who pretend to care about minority struggles, while ignoring systemic issues.
My criticism is that Liberals are Centre-Right posers who pretend to be left-wing. I dislike them as someone who is actually far left.
<|endoftext|>
User:
Reddit Comment: So, you'd like and repeat that Alex Jones piece that agrees with your dogma, just because it agrees with your preconceptions. Even though that man is well known for flat out making shit up. But hey, he made shit up that you agree with, so that's good enough for you.
<|endoftext|>
User:
Reddit Comment: How is being so right-wing as AG that a republican challenges you from the left fair to any class? How is executing innocent people fair? How is a life sentence based on an antiquated 3-strile rule fair? How is being forced into slave labor for minor offenses fair? How is advocating for heavy handed criminal penalties for the poor, but neglecting to prosecute a bank for literally stealing families' houses fair? By all means, support whoever you want, but to pretend she's some warrior of justice helping all classes equally is just not based in facts.
<|endoftext|>
User:
Reddit Comment: I didn't lose the midterms, "sport"....the country did.
<|endoftext|>
User:
Reddit Comment: So you don't get your ass sued for Title IX. Thanks, Obama.
<|endoftext|>
User:
Reddit Comment: [removed]
<|endoftext|>
User:
Reddit Comment: he is up for election this year if anyone wants to send him $27 http://www.carterforvirginia.com/
<|endoftext|>
User:
Reddit Comment: Happy New Year to all the fam here! I love you all so much and can't wait to keep MAGA-ing with you all in 2019.
Thank you to the Mods for all you do.
Thank you Mr. President for being our champion.
RIP Harambe.
U/Spez is a censoring cuck.
Bill Clinton is a rapist.
His name was Seth Rich.
Shadilay!
God Bless America!!!!!
馃嚭馃嚫馃憣馃惛
<|endoftext|>
User:
Reddit Comment: Most of the same Republicans that impeached Bill Clinton *for a single act of perjury over an irrelevant sexual act* are the same ones now defending a President
Don't sugar coat Clinton. The office needs to be held accountable for all crimes. Perjury is perjury regardless of the subject. To qualify the crime of perjury with *an irrelevant sexual act* opens the door for filtering and evaluating the severity of a crime with another set of standards. Conviction comes first, and then only afterwards should the Senate consider the punishment, the same way that the Judicial process works. Clinton was Impeached and should have been convicted. The fact that he wasn't, it opens the door for the Senate Republicans to use partisan tactics to leave him in office for their manipulation and benefit.
<|endoftext|>
User:
Reddit Comment: I've said this before: the book I want to read is the one written by the rank and file WH employees. Housekeeping stories will be LIT!
<|endoftext|>
User:
Reddit Comment: Upvotes for that, seriously? Russia in 1917 was a hellhole, despite the fact that some of the peasants could read, and despite having a nominally democratic, completely dysfunctional government for all of 6 months.
It was in a terrible economical position because of ww1, yes. Doesn't mean it wasn't looking up for russians until the commie revolution happened, that is.
TIL uneducated people have never revolted.
Peasant revolts, yes. Commies one tho ? No.
<|endoftext|>
User:
Reddit Comment: He'll either call him fat and ugly or beg to become a minority slave for a str8 masc right-leaning white dude.
<|endoftext|>
User:
Reddit Comment: I hope everyone has a good night!
<|endoftext|>