id
stringlengths 15
18
| query
stringlengths 1.28k
9.7k
| answer
stringlengths 2
14
|
|---|---|---|
CONVFINQA_test700 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 231.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>15.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gas revenue</td><td>6.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rider revenue</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>base revenue</td><td>-11.3 ( 11.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>7.0</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 252.7</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2007 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007 , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007 . refer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit , effective january 2008 . the base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales ; an increase of $ 47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage ; and an increase of $ 22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007 . fuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand. .
Question: what was the net change in revenue from 2007 to 2008?
| 21.7 |
CONVFINQA_test701 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>amount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007 net revenue</td><td>$ 231.0</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>volume/weather</td><td>15.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net gas revenue</td><td>6.6</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>rider revenue</td><td>3.9</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>base revenue</td><td>-11.3 ( 11.3 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other</td><td>7.0</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>2008 net revenue</td><td>$ 252.7</td></tr></table> the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2007 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007 , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007 . refer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit , effective january 2008 . the base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales ; an increase of $ 47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage ; and an increase of $ 22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007 . fuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand. .
Question: what was the net change in revenue from 2007 to 2008?
Answer: 21.7
Question: what is the 2008 rider revenue divided by that net change?
| 0.17972 |
CONVFINQA_test702 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 1b . unresolved staff comments not applicable . item 2 . properties as of december 28 , 2013 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 29.9 16.7 46.6 leased facilities2 2.3 6.0 8.3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( square feet in millions )</td><td>unitedstates</td><td>othercountries</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>owned facilities1</td><td>29.9</td><td>16.7</td><td>46.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>leased facilities2</td><td>2.3</td><td>6.0</td><td>8.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total facilities</td><td>32.2</td><td>22.7</td><td>54.9</td></tr></table> 1 leases on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2062 . 2 leases expire on varying dates through 2028 and generally include renewals at our option . our principal executive offices are located in the u.s . and a significant amount of our wafer fabrication activities are also located in the u.s . in addition to our current facilities , we are building a development fabrication facility in oregon which began r&d start-up in 2013 . we expect that this new facility will allow us to widen our process technology lead . we also completed construction of a large-scale fabrication building in arizona in 2013 , which is currently not in use and is not being depreciated . we recently announced that we plan to delay equipment installation in this building and leverage existing fabrication facilities , reserving this new facility for additional capacity and future technologies . outside the u.s. , we have wafer fabrication facilities in israel , china , and ireland . our fabrication facility in ireland is currently transitioning to a newer process technology node , with manufacturing expected to recommence in 2015 . our assembly and test facilities are located in malaysia , china , costa rica , and vietnam . in addition , we have sales and marketing offices worldwide that are generally located near major concentrations of customers . we believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it . we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment . for information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 27 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 3 . legal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 26 : contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable . table of contents .
Question: as of december 28, 2013, what percentage of the square footage of major facilities was owned?
| 0.84882 |
CONVFINQA_test703 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 1b . unresolved staff comments not applicable . item 2 . properties as of december 28 , 2013 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 29.9 16.7 46.6 leased facilities2 2.3 6.0 8.3 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( square feet in millions )</td><td>unitedstates</td><td>othercountries</td><td>total</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>owned facilities1</td><td>29.9</td><td>16.7</td><td>46.6</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>leased facilities2</td><td>2.3</td><td>6.0</td><td>8.3</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total facilities</td><td>32.2</td><td>22.7</td><td>54.9</td></tr></table> 1 leases on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2062 . 2 leases expire on varying dates through 2028 and generally include renewals at our option . our principal executive offices are located in the u.s . and a significant amount of our wafer fabrication activities are also located in the u.s . in addition to our current facilities , we are building a development fabrication facility in oregon which began r&d start-up in 2013 . we expect that this new facility will allow us to widen our process technology lead . we also completed construction of a large-scale fabrication building in arizona in 2013 , which is currently not in use and is not being depreciated . we recently announced that we plan to delay equipment installation in this building and leverage existing fabrication facilities , reserving this new facility for additional capacity and future technologies . outside the u.s. , we have wafer fabrication facilities in israel , china , and ireland . our fabrication facility in ireland is currently transitioning to a newer process technology node , with manufacturing expected to recommence in 2015 . our assembly and test facilities are located in malaysia , china , costa rica , and vietnam . in addition , we have sales and marketing offices worldwide that are generally located near major concentrations of customers . we believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it . we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment . for information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 27 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 3 . legal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 26 : contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable . table of contents .
Question: as of december 28, 2013, what percentage of the square footage of major facilities was owned?
Answer: 0.84882
Question: and what percentage was leased?
| 0.15118 |
CONVFINQA_test704 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since december 31 , 2007 , assuming that dividends were reinvested . the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group . snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal year ended ( 2 )</td><td>snap-onincorporated</td><td>peer group ( 3 )</td><td>s&p 500</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2007</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2008</td><td>83.66</td><td>66.15</td><td>63.00</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2009</td><td>93.20</td><td>84.12</td><td>79.67</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2010</td><td>128.21</td><td>112.02</td><td>91.67</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>117.47</td><td>109.70</td><td>93.61</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>187.26</td><td>129.00</td><td>108.59</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 , and that dividends were reinvested quarterly . ( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday that is on or nearest to december 31 of each year ; for ease of calculation , the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 . ( 3 ) the peer group consists of : stanley black & decker , inc. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair ltd. , spx corporation and w.w . grainger , inc . cooper industries plc , a former member of the peer group , was removed , as it was acquired by a larger , non-comparable company in 2012 . 2012 annual report 23 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 2007 2008 201120102009 2012 .
Question: what was the performance price of the s&p 500 in 2012?
| 108.59 |
CONVFINQA_test705 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since december 31 , 2007 , assuming that dividends were reinvested . the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group . snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal year ended ( 2 )</td><td>snap-onincorporated</td><td>peer group ( 3 )</td><td>s&p 500</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2007</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2008</td><td>83.66</td><td>66.15</td><td>63.00</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2009</td><td>93.20</td><td>84.12</td><td>79.67</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2010</td><td>128.21</td><td>112.02</td><td>91.67</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>117.47</td><td>109.70</td><td>93.61</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>187.26</td><td>129.00</td><td>108.59</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 , and that dividends were reinvested quarterly . ( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday that is on or nearest to december 31 of each year ; for ease of calculation , the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 . ( 3 ) the peer group consists of : stanley black & decker , inc. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair ltd. , spx corporation and w.w . grainger , inc . cooper industries plc , a former member of the peer group , was removed , as it was acquired by a larger , non-comparable company in 2012 . 2012 annual report 23 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 2007 2008 201120102009 2012 .
Question: what was the performance price of the s&p 500 in 2012?
Answer: 108.59
Question: and what was the change in that performance price from 2007 to 2012?
| 8.59 |
CONVFINQA_test706 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since december 31 , 2007 , assuming that dividends were reinvested . the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group . snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>fiscal year ended ( 2 )</td><td>snap-onincorporated</td><td>peer group ( 3 )</td><td>s&p 500</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>december 31 2007</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 100.00</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>december 31 2008</td><td>83.66</td><td>66.15</td><td>63.00</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 31 2009</td><td>93.20</td><td>84.12</td><td>79.67</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>december 31 2010</td><td>128.21</td><td>112.02</td><td>91.67</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>december 31 2011</td><td>117.47</td><td>109.70</td><td>93.61</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>december 31 2012</td><td>187.26</td><td>129.00</td><td>108.59</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 , and that dividends were reinvested quarterly . ( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday that is on or nearest to december 31 of each year ; for ease of calculation , the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 . ( 3 ) the peer group consists of : stanley black & decker , inc. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair ltd. , spx corporation and w.w . grainger , inc . cooper industries plc , a former member of the peer group , was removed , as it was acquired by a larger , non-comparable company in 2012 . 2012 annual report 23 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 2007 2008 201120102009 2012 .
Question: what was the performance price of the s&p 500 in 2012?
Answer: 108.59
Question: and what was the change in that performance price from 2007 to 2012?
Answer: 8.59
Question: how much, then, does this change represent in relation to the performance price of that stock in 2007?
| 0.0859 |
CONVFINQA_test707 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
proportional free cash flow ( a non-gaap measure ) we define proportional free cash flow as cash flows from operating activities less maintenance capital expenditures ( including non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures ) , adjusted for the estimated impact of noncontrolling interests . the proportionate share of cash flows and related adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests in our subsidiaries comprise the proportional adjustment factor presented in the reconciliation below . upon the company's adoption of the accounting guidance for service concession arrangements effective january 1 , 2015 , capital expenditures related to service concession assets that would have been classified as investing activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows are now classified as operating activities . see note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies of this form 10-k for further information on the adoption of this guidance . beginning in the quarter ended march 31 , 2015 , the company changed the definition of proportional free cash flow to exclude the cash flows for capital expenditures related to service concession assets that are now classified within net cash provided by operating activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows . the proportional adjustment factor for these capital expenditures is presented in the reconciliation below . we also exclude environmental capital expenditures that are expected to be recovered through regulatory , contractual or other mechanisms . an example of recoverable environmental capital expenditures is ipl's investment in mats-related environmental upgrades that are recovered through a tracker . see item 1 . 2014us sbu 2014ipl 2014environmental matters for details of these investments . the gaap measure most comparable to proportional free cash flow is cash flows from operating activities . we believe that proportional free cash flow better reflects the underlying business performance of the company , as it measures the cash generated by the business , after the funding of maintenance capital expenditures , that may be available for investing or repaying debt or other purposes . factors in this determination include the impact of noncontrolling interests , where aes consolidates the results of a subsidiary that is not wholly-owned by the company . the presentation of free cash flow has material limitations . proportional free cash flow should not be construed as an alternative to cash from operating activities , which is determined in accordance with gaap . proportional free cash flow does not represent our cash flow available for discretionary payments because it excludes certain payments that are required or to which we have committed , such as debt service requirements and dividend payments . our definition of proportional free cash flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies . calculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions ) 2015 2014 2013 2015/2014change 2014/2013 change . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2015/2014 change</td><td>2014/2013 change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2134</td><td>$ 1791</td><td>$ 2715</td><td>$ 343</td><td>$ -924 ( 924 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>add : capital expenditures related to service concession assets ( 1 )</td><td>165</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>165</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>adjusted operating cash flow</td><td>2299</td><td>1791</td><td>2715</td><td>508</td><td>-924 ( 924 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>less : proportional adjustment factor on operating cash activities ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>-558 ( 558 )</td><td>-359 ( 359 )</td><td>-834 ( 834 )</td><td>-199 ( 199 )</td><td>475</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>proportional adjusted operating cash flow</td><td>1741</td><td>1432</td><td>1881</td><td>309</td><td>-449 ( 449 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>less : proportional maintenance capital expenditures net of reinsurance proceeds ( 2 )</td><td>-449 ( 449 )</td><td>-485 ( 485 )</td><td>-535 ( 535 )</td><td>36</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>less : proportional non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures ( 2 ) ( 4 )</td><td>-51 ( 51 )</td><td>-56 ( 56 )</td><td>-75 ( 75 )</td><td>5</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>proportional free cash flow</td><td>$ 1241</td><td>$ 891</td><td>$ 1271</td><td>$ 350</td><td>$ -380 ( 380 )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) service concession asset expenditures excluded from proportional free cash flow non-gaap metric . ( 2 ) the proportional adjustment factor , proportional maintenance capital expenditures ( net of reinsurance proceeds ) and proportional non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures are calculated by multiplying the percentage owned by noncontrolling interests for each entity by its corresponding consolidated cash flow metric and are totaled to the resulting figures . for example , parent company a owns 20% ( 20 % ) of subsidiary company b , a consolidated subsidiary . thus , subsidiary company b has an 80% ( 80 % ) noncontrolling interest . assuming a consolidated net cash flow from operating activities of $ 100 from subsidiary b , the proportional adjustment factor for subsidiary b would equal $ 80 ( or $ 100 x 80% ( 80 % ) ) . the company calculates the proportional adjustment factor for each consolidated business in this manner and then sums these amounts to determine the total proportional adjustment factor used in the reconciliation . the proportional adjustment factor may differ from the proportion of income attributable to noncontrolling interests as a result of ( a ) non-cash items which impact income but not cash and ( b ) aes' ownership interest in the subsidiary where such items occur . ( 3 ) includes proportional adjustment amount for service concession asset expenditures of $ 84 million for the year ended december 31 , 2015 . the company adopted service concession accounting effective january 1 , 2015 . ( 4 ) excludes ipl's proportional recoverable environmental capital expenditures of $ 205 million , $ 163 million and $ 110 million for the years december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively. .
Question: what percentage did the change in the proportional free cash flow from 2008 to 2009 represent in relation to that cash in 2008?
| -0.29898 |
CONVFINQA_test708 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
proportional free cash flow ( a non-gaap measure ) we define proportional free cash flow as cash flows from operating activities less maintenance capital expenditures ( including non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures ) , adjusted for the estimated impact of noncontrolling interests . the proportionate share of cash flows and related adjustments attributable to noncontrolling interests in our subsidiaries comprise the proportional adjustment factor presented in the reconciliation below . upon the company's adoption of the accounting guidance for service concession arrangements effective january 1 , 2015 , capital expenditures related to service concession assets that would have been classified as investing activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows are now classified as operating activities . see note 1 2014general and summary of significant accounting policies of this form 10-k for further information on the adoption of this guidance . beginning in the quarter ended march 31 , 2015 , the company changed the definition of proportional free cash flow to exclude the cash flows for capital expenditures related to service concession assets that are now classified within net cash provided by operating activities on the consolidated statement of cash flows . the proportional adjustment factor for these capital expenditures is presented in the reconciliation below . we also exclude environmental capital expenditures that are expected to be recovered through regulatory , contractual or other mechanisms . an example of recoverable environmental capital expenditures is ipl's investment in mats-related environmental upgrades that are recovered through a tracker . see item 1 . 2014us sbu 2014ipl 2014environmental matters for details of these investments . the gaap measure most comparable to proportional free cash flow is cash flows from operating activities . we believe that proportional free cash flow better reflects the underlying business performance of the company , as it measures the cash generated by the business , after the funding of maintenance capital expenditures , that may be available for investing or repaying debt or other purposes . factors in this determination include the impact of noncontrolling interests , where aes consolidates the results of a subsidiary that is not wholly-owned by the company . the presentation of free cash flow has material limitations . proportional free cash flow should not be construed as an alternative to cash from operating activities , which is determined in accordance with gaap . proportional free cash flow does not represent our cash flow available for discretionary payments because it excludes certain payments that are required or to which we have committed , such as debt service requirements and dividend payments . our definition of proportional free cash flow may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other companies . calculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions ) 2015 2014 2013 2015/2014change 2014/2013 change . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>calculation of proportional free cash flow ( in millions )</td><td>2015</td><td>2014</td><td>2013</td><td>2015/2014 change</td><td>2014/2013 change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net cash provided by operating activities</td><td>$ 2134</td><td>$ 1791</td><td>$ 2715</td><td>$ 343</td><td>$ -924 ( 924 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>add : capital expenditures related to service concession assets ( 1 )</td><td>165</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td><td>165</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>adjusted operating cash flow</td><td>2299</td><td>1791</td><td>2715</td><td>508</td><td>-924 ( 924 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>less : proportional adjustment factor on operating cash activities ( 2 ) ( 3 )</td><td>-558 ( 558 )</td><td>-359 ( 359 )</td><td>-834 ( 834 )</td><td>-199 ( 199 )</td><td>475</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>proportional adjusted operating cash flow</td><td>1741</td><td>1432</td><td>1881</td><td>309</td><td>-449 ( 449 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>less : proportional maintenance capital expenditures net of reinsurance proceeds ( 2 )</td><td>-449 ( 449 )</td><td>-485 ( 485 )</td><td>-535 ( 535 )</td><td>36</td><td>50</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>less : proportional non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures ( 2 ) ( 4 )</td><td>-51 ( 51 )</td><td>-56 ( 56 )</td><td>-75 ( 75 )</td><td>5</td><td>19</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>proportional free cash flow</td><td>$ 1241</td><td>$ 891</td><td>$ 1271</td><td>$ 350</td><td>$ -380 ( 380 )</td></tr></table> ( 1 ) service concession asset expenditures excluded from proportional free cash flow non-gaap metric . ( 2 ) the proportional adjustment factor , proportional maintenance capital expenditures ( net of reinsurance proceeds ) and proportional non-recoverable environmental capital expenditures are calculated by multiplying the percentage owned by noncontrolling interests for each entity by its corresponding consolidated cash flow metric and are totaled to the resulting figures . for example , parent company a owns 20% ( 20 % ) of subsidiary company b , a consolidated subsidiary . thus , subsidiary company b has an 80% ( 80 % ) noncontrolling interest . assuming a consolidated net cash flow from operating activities of $ 100 from subsidiary b , the proportional adjustment factor for subsidiary b would equal $ 80 ( or $ 100 x 80% ( 80 % ) ) . the company calculates the proportional adjustment factor for each consolidated business in this manner and then sums these amounts to determine the total proportional adjustment factor used in the reconciliation . the proportional adjustment factor may differ from the proportion of income attributable to noncontrolling interests as a result of ( a ) non-cash items which impact income but not cash and ( b ) aes' ownership interest in the subsidiary where such items occur . ( 3 ) includes proportional adjustment amount for service concession asset expenditures of $ 84 million for the year ended december 31 , 2015 . the company adopted service concession accounting effective january 1 , 2015 . ( 4 ) excludes ipl's proportional recoverable environmental capital expenditures of $ 205 million , $ 163 million and $ 110 million for the years december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively. .
Question: what percentage did the change in the proportional free cash flow from 2008 to 2009 represent in relation to that cash in 2008?
Answer: -0.29898
Question: and what was this percentage change from 2007 to 2008?
| 0.39282 |
CONVFINQA_test709 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations we are a global integrated energy company with significant operations in the north america , africa and europe . our operations are organized into four reportable segments : 2022 exploration and production ( 201ce&p 201d ) which explores for , produces and markets liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas on a worldwide basis . 2022 oil sands mining ( 201cosm 201d ) which mines , extracts and transports bitumen from oil sands deposits in alberta , canada , and upgrades the bitumen to produce and market synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas 2022 integrated gas ( 201cig 201d ) which markets and transports products manufactured from natural gas , such as liquefied natural gas ( 201clng 201d ) and methanol , on a worldwide basis . 2022 refining , marketing & transportation ( 201crm&t 201d ) which refines , markets and transports crude oil and petroleum products , primarily in the midwest , upper great plains , gulf coast and southeastern regions of the united states . certain sections of management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations include forward-looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting our business . these statements typically contain words such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201ctargets , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cprojects , 201d 201ccould , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cshould , 201d 201cwould 201d or similar words indicating that future outcomes are uncertain . in accordance with 201csafe harbor 201d provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 , these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors , though not necessarily all such factors , which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements . we hold a 60 percent interest in equatorial guinea lng holdings limited ( 201cegholdings 201d ) . as discussed in note 4 to the consolidated financial statements , effective may 1 , 2007 , we ceased consolidating egholdings . our investment is accounted for using the equity method of accounting . unless specifically noted , amounts presented for the integrated gas segment for periods prior to may 1 , 2007 , include amounts related to the minority interests . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information under item 1 . business , item 1a . risk factors , item 6 . selected financial data and item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data . overview exploration and production prevailing prices for the various grades of crude oil and natural gas that we produce significantly impact our revenues and cash flows . prices were volatile in 2009 , but not as much as in the previous year . prices in 2009 were also lower than in recent years as illustrated by the annual averages for key benchmark prices below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>benchmark</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>wti crude oil ( dollars per barrel )</td><td>$ 62.09</td><td>$ 99.75</td><td>$ 72.41</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dated brent crude oil ( dollars per barrel )</td><td>$ 61.67</td><td>$ 97.26</td><td>$ 72.39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mcf ) ( a )</td><td>$ 3.99</td><td>$ 9.04</td><td>$ 6.86</td></tr></table> henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mcf ) ( a ) $ 3.99 $ 9.04 $ 6.86 ( a ) first-of-month price index . crude oil prices rose sharply through the first half of 2008 as a result of strong global demand , a declining dollar , ongoing concerns about supplies of crude oil , and geopolitical risk . later in 2008 , crude oil prices sharply declined as the u.s . dollar rebounded and global demand decreased as a result of economic recession . the price decrease continued into 2009 , but reversed after dropping below $ 33.98 in february , ending the year at $ 79.36 . our domestic crude oil production is about 62 percent sour , which means that it contains more sulfur than light sweet wti does . sour crude oil also tends to be heavier than light sweet crude oil and sells at a discount to light sweet crude oil because of higher refining costs and lower refined product values . our international crude oil production is relatively sweet and is generally sold in relation to the dated brent crude benchmark . the differential between wti and dated brent average prices narrowed to $ 0.42 in 2009 compared to $ 2.49 in 2008 and $ 0.02 in 2007. .
Question: what is the net change in the price of henry hub natural gas from 2007 to 2009?
| -2.87 |
CONVFINQA_test710 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations we are a global integrated energy company with significant operations in the north america , africa and europe . our operations are organized into four reportable segments : 2022 exploration and production ( 201ce&p 201d ) which explores for , produces and markets liquid hydrocarbons and natural gas on a worldwide basis . 2022 oil sands mining ( 201cosm 201d ) which mines , extracts and transports bitumen from oil sands deposits in alberta , canada , and upgrades the bitumen to produce and market synthetic crude oil and vacuum gas 2022 integrated gas ( 201cig 201d ) which markets and transports products manufactured from natural gas , such as liquefied natural gas ( 201clng 201d ) and methanol , on a worldwide basis . 2022 refining , marketing & transportation ( 201crm&t 201d ) which refines , markets and transports crude oil and petroleum products , primarily in the midwest , upper great plains , gulf coast and southeastern regions of the united states . certain sections of management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations include forward-looking statements concerning trends or events potentially affecting our business . these statements typically contain words such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201ctargets , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cprojects , 201d 201ccould , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cshould , 201d 201cwould 201d or similar words indicating that future outcomes are uncertain . in accordance with 201csafe harbor 201d provisions of the private securities litigation reform act of 1995 , these statements are accompanied by cautionary language identifying important factors , though not necessarily all such factors , which could cause future outcomes to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements . we hold a 60 percent interest in equatorial guinea lng holdings limited ( 201cegholdings 201d ) . as discussed in note 4 to the consolidated financial statements , effective may 1 , 2007 , we ceased consolidating egholdings . our investment is accounted for using the equity method of accounting . unless specifically noted , amounts presented for the integrated gas segment for periods prior to may 1 , 2007 , include amounts related to the minority interests . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the information under item 1 . business , item 1a . risk factors , item 6 . selected financial data and item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data . overview exploration and production prevailing prices for the various grades of crude oil and natural gas that we produce significantly impact our revenues and cash flows . prices were volatile in 2009 , but not as much as in the previous year . prices in 2009 were also lower than in recent years as illustrated by the annual averages for key benchmark prices below. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>benchmark</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>wti crude oil ( dollars per barrel )</td><td>$ 62.09</td><td>$ 99.75</td><td>$ 72.41</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dated brent crude oil ( dollars per barrel )</td><td>$ 61.67</td><td>$ 97.26</td><td>$ 72.39</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mcf ) ( a )</td><td>$ 3.99</td><td>$ 9.04</td><td>$ 6.86</td></tr></table> henry hub natural gas ( dollars per mcf ) ( a ) $ 3.99 $ 9.04 $ 6.86 ( a ) first-of-month price index . crude oil prices rose sharply through the first half of 2008 as a result of strong global demand , a declining dollar , ongoing concerns about supplies of crude oil , and geopolitical risk . later in 2008 , crude oil prices sharply declined as the u.s . dollar rebounded and global demand decreased as a result of economic recession . the price decrease continued into 2009 , but reversed after dropping below $ 33.98 in february , ending the year at $ 79.36 . our domestic crude oil production is about 62 percent sour , which means that it contains more sulfur than light sweet wti does . sour crude oil also tends to be heavier than light sweet crude oil and sells at a discount to light sweet crude oil because of higher refining costs and lower refined product values . our international crude oil production is relatively sweet and is generally sold in relation to the dated brent crude benchmark . the differential between wti and dated brent average prices narrowed to $ 0.42 in 2009 compared to $ 2.49 in 2008 and $ 0.02 in 2007. .
Question: what is the net change in the price of henry hub natural gas from 2007 to 2009?
Answer: -2.87
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| -0.41837 |
CONVFINQA_test711 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2008 and 2007. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 42.72</td><td>$ 32.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>46.10</td><td>38.53</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>43.43</td><td>31.89</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>37.28</td><td>19.35</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2007</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 41.31</td><td>$ 36.63</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>43.84</td><td>37.64</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>45.45</td><td>36.34</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>46.53</td><td>40.08</td></tr></table> on february 13 , 2009 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 28.85 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 13 , 2009 , we had 397097677 outstanding shares of common stock and 499 registered holders . dividends we have never paid a dividend on our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan , and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .
Question: what was the price of shares in february of 2009?
| 37.28 |
CONVFINQA_test712 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2008 and 2007. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 42.72</td><td>$ 32.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>46.10</td><td>38.53</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>43.43</td><td>31.89</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>37.28</td><td>19.35</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2007</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 41.31</td><td>$ 36.63</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>43.84</td><td>37.64</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>45.45</td><td>36.34</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>46.53</td><td>40.08</td></tr></table> on february 13 , 2009 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 28.85 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 13 , 2009 , we had 397097677 outstanding shares of common stock and 499 registered holders . dividends we have never paid a dividend on our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan , and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .
Question: what was the price of shares in february of 2009?
Answer: 37.28
Question: and what was it in by the end of 2008?
| 28.85 |
CONVFINQA_test713 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2008 and 2007. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 42.72</td><td>$ 32.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>46.10</td><td>38.53</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>43.43</td><td>31.89</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>37.28</td><td>19.35</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2007</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 41.31</td><td>$ 36.63</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>43.84</td><td>37.64</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>45.45</td><td>36.34</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>46.53</td><td>40.08</td></tr></table> on february 13 , 2009 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 28.85 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 13 , 2009 , we had 397097677 outstanding shares of common stock and 499 registered holders . dividends we have never paid a dividend on our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan , and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .
Question: what was the price of shares in february of 2009?
Answer: 37.28
Question: and what was it in by the end of 2008?
Answer: 28.85
Question: what was, then, the change over that period?
| 8.43 |
CONVFINQA_test714 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2008 and 2007. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 42.72</td><td>$ 32.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>46.10</td><td>38.53</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>43.43</td><td>31.89</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>37.28</td><td>19.35</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2007</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 41.31</td><td>$ 36.63</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>43.84</td><td>37.64</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>45.45</td><td>36.34</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>46.53</td><td>40.08</td></tr></table> on february 13 , 2009 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 28.85 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 13 , 2009 , we had 397097677 outstanding shares of common stock and 499 registered holders . dividends we have never paid a dividend on our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan , and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .
Question: what was the price of shares in february of 2009?
Answer: 37.28
Question: and what was it in by the end of 2008?
Answer: 28.85
Question: what was, then, the change over that period?
Answer: 8.43
Question: what was the price of shares in the end of 2008?
| 28.85 |
CONVFINQA_test715 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2008 and 2007. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2008</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 42.72</td><td>$ 32.10</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>46.10</td><td>38.53</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>43.43</td><td>31.89</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>37.28</td><td>19.35</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2007</td><td>high</td><td>low</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>quarter ended march 31</td><td>$ 41.31</td><td>$ 36.63</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>quarter ended june 30</td><td>43.84</td><td>37.64</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>quarter ended september 30</td><td>45.45</td><td>36.34</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>quarter ended december 31</td><td>46.53</td><td>40.08</td></tr></table> on february 13 , 2009 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 28.85 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 13 , 2009 , we had 397097677 outstanding shares of common stock and 499 registered holders . dividends we have never paid a dividend on our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan , and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .
Question: what was the price of shares in february of 2009?
Answer: 37.28
Question: and what was it in by the end of 2008?
Answer: 28.85
Question: what was, then, the change over that period?
Answer: 8.43
Question: what was the price of shares in the end of 2008?
Answer: 28.85
Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2008 price?
| 0.2922 |
CONVFINQA_test716 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 . in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments . the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>pensionbenefits</td><td>otherbenefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 1440</td><td>$ 260</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>1490</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>1540</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>1600</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1660</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years 2012 2013 2016</td><td>9530</td><td>1260</td></tr></table> as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits . the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million . the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 . we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans . the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows . note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) . certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s . government under short-term or cancelable arrangements . note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment . we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole . we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty . these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio . the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology . we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation . on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california . we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program . the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s . air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 . on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim . our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals . on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel . natural resources defense council , et al v . lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel . john d . tillson v . lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al . the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .
Question: what is the rental expense under operating leases in 2005?
| 324.0 |
CONVFINQA_test717 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 . in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments . the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>pensionbenefits</td><td>otherbenefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 1440</td><td>$ 260</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>1490</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>1540</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>1600</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1660</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years 2012 2013 2016</td><td>9530</td><td>1260</td></tr></table> as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits . the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million . the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 . we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans . the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows . note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) . certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s . government under short-term or cancelable arrangements . note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment . we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole . we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty . these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio . the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology . we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation . on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california . we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program . the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s . air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 . on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim . our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals . on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel . natural resources defense council , et al v . lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel . john d . tillson v . lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al . the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .
Question: what is the rental expense under operating leases in 2005?
Answer: 324.0
Question: what about in 2004?
| 318.0 |
CONVFINQA_test718 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 . in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments . the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>pensionbenefits</td><td>otherbenefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 1440</td><td>$ 260</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>1490</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>1540</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>1600</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1660</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years 2012 2013 2016</td><td>9530</td><td>1260</td></tr></table> as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits . the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million . the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 . we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans . the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows . note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) . certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s . government under short-term or cancelable arrangements . note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment . we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole . we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty . these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio . the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology . we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation . on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california . we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program . the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s . air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 . on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim . our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals . on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel . natural resources defense council , et al v . lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel . john d . tillson v . lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al . the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .
Question: what is the rental expense under operating leases in 2005?
Answer: 324.0
Question: what about in 2004?
Answer: 318.0
Question: what is the net change?
| 6.0 |
CONVFINQA_test719 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 . in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments . the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>pensionbenefits</td><td>otherbenefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 1440</td><td>$ 260</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>1490</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>1540</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>1600</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1660</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years 2012 2013 2016</td><td>9530</td><td>1260</td></tr></table> as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits . the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million . the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 . we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans . the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows . note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) . certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s . government under short-term or cancelable arrangements . note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment . we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole . we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty . these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio . the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology . we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation . on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california . we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program . the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s . air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 . on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim . our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals . on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel . natural resources defense council , et al v . lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel . john d . tillson v . lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al . the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .
Question: what is the rental expense under operating leases in 2005?
Answer: 324.0
Question: what about in 2004?
Answer: 318.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 6.0
Question: what is the rental expense under operating leases in 2004?
| 318.0 |
CONVFINQA_test720 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the defined benefit pension plans 2019 trust and $ 130 million to our retiree medical plans which will reduce our cash funding requirements for 2007 and 2008 . in 2007 , we expect to make no contributions to the defined benefit pension plans and expect to contribute $ 175 million to the retiree medical and life insurance plans , after giving consideration to the 2006 prepayments . the following benefit payments , which reflect expected future service , as appropriate , are expected to be paid : ( in millions ) pension benefits benefits . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>pensionbenefits</td><td>otherbenefits</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2007</td><td>$ 1440</td><td>$ 260</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2008</td><td>1490</td><td>260</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2009</td><td>1540</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2010</td><td>1600</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>2011</td><td>1660</td><td>270</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>years 2012 2013 2016</td><td>9530</td><td>1260</td></tr></table> as noted previously , we also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits . the aggregate liabilities for these plans at december 31 , 2006 were $ 641 million . the expense associated with these plans totaled $ 59 million in 2006 , $ 58 million in 2005 and $ 61 million in 2004 . we also sponsor a small number of foreign benefit plans . the liabilities and expenses associated with these plans are not material to our results of operations , financial position or cash flows . note 13 2013 leases our total rental expense under operating leases was $ 310 million , $ 324 million and $ 318 million for 2006 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively . future minimum lease commitments at december 31 , 2006 for all operating leases that have a remaining term of more than one year were $ 1.1 billion ( $ 288 million in 2007 , $ 254 million in 2008 , $ 211 million in 2009 , $ 153 million in 2010 , $ 118 million in 2011 and $ 121 million in later years ) . certain major plant facilities and equipment are furnished by the u.s . government under short-term or cancelable arrangements . note 14 2013 legal proceedings , commitments and contingencies we are a party to or have property subject to litigation and other proceedings , including matters arising under provisions relating to the protection of the environment . we believe the probability is remote that the outcome of these matters will have a material adverse effect on the corporation as a whole . we cannot predict the outcome of legal proceedings with certainty . these matters include the following items , all of which have been previously reported : on march 27 , 2006 , we received a subpoena issued by a grand jury in the united states district court for the northern district of ohio . the subpoena requests documents related to our application for patents issued in the united states and the united kingdom relating to a missile detection and warning technology . we are cooperating with the government 2019s investigation . on february 6 , 2004 , we submitted a certified contract claim to the united states requesting contractual indemnity for remediation and litigation costs ( past and future ) related to our former facility in redlands , california . we submitted the claim consistent with a claim sponsorship agreement with the boeing company ( boeing ) , executed in 2001 , in boeing 2019s role as the prime contractor on the short range attack missile ( sram ) program . the contract for the sram program , which formed a significant portion of our work at the redlands facility , had special contractual indemnities from the u.s . air force , as authorized by public law 85-804 . on august 31 , 2004 , the united states denied the claim . our appeal of that decision is pending with the armed services board of contract appeals . on august 28 , 2003 , the department of justice ( the doj ) filed complaints in partial intervention in two lawsuits filed under the qui tam provisions of the civil false claims act in the united states district court for the western district of kentucky , united states ex rel . natural resources defense council , et al v . lockheed martin corporation , et al , and united states ex rel . john d . tillson v . lockheed martin energy systems , inc. , et al . the doj alleges that we committed violations of the resource conservation and recovery act at the paducah gaseous diffusion plant by not properly handling , storing .
Question: what is the rental expense under operating leases in 2005?
Answer: 324.0
Question: what about in 2004?
Answer: 318.0
Question: what is the net change?
Answer: 6.0
Question: what is the rental expense under operating leases in 2004?
Answer: 318.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.01887 |
CONVFINQA_test721 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements of the $ 446 million present value of net minimum capital lease payments , $ 53 million was related to obligations assumed by united states steel under the financial matters agreement . operating lease rental expense was : ( in millions ) 2009 2008 2007 minimum rental ( a ) $ 238 $ 245 $ 209 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>minimum rental ( a )</td><td>$ 238</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 209</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contingent rental</td><td>19</td><td>22</td><td>33</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net rental expense</td><td>$ 257</td><td>$ 267</td><td>$ 242</td></tr></table> ( a ) excludes $ 3 million , $ 5 million and $ 8 million paid by united states steel in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 on assumed leases . 26 . commitments and contingencies we are the subject of , or party to , a number of pending or threatened legal actions , contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters , including laws and regulations relating to the environment . certain of these matters are discussed below . the ultimate resolution of these contingencies could , individually or in the aggregate , be material to our consolidated financial statements . however , management believes that we will remain a viable and competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these contingencies could be resolved unfavorably . environmental matters 2013 we are subject to federal , state , local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the environment . these laws generally provide for control of pollutants released into the environment and require responsible parties to undertake remediation of hazardous waste disposal sites . penalties may be imposed for noncompliance . at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , accrued liabilities for remediation totaled $ 116 million and $ 111 million . it is not presently possible to estimate the ultimate amount of all remediation costs that might be incurred or the penalties that may be imposed . receivables for recoverable costs from certain states , under programs to assist companies in clean-up efforts related to underground storage tanks at retail marketing outlets , were $ 59 and $ 60 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 . legal cases 2013 we , along with other refining companies , settled a number of lawsuits pertaining to methyl tertiary-butyl ether ( 201cmtbe 201d ) in 2008 . presently , we are a defendant , along with other refining companies , in 27 cases arising in four states alleging damages for mtbe contamination . like the cases that we settled in 2008 , 12 of the remaining cases are consolidated in a multi-district litigation ( 201cmdl 201d ) in the southern district of new york for pretrial proceedings . the other 15 cases are in new york state courts ( nassau and suffolk counties ) . plaintiffs in 26 of the 27 cases allege damages to water supply wells from contamination of groundwater by mtbe , similar to the damages claimed in the cases settled in 2008 . in the remaining case , the new jersey department of environmental protection is seeking the cost of remediating mtbe contamination and natural resources damages allegedly resulting from contamination of groundwater by mtbe . we are vigorously defending these cases . we have engaged in settlement discussions related to the majority of these cases . we do not expect our share of liability for these cases to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows . we voluntarily discontinued producing mtbe in 2002 . we are currently a party to one qui tam case , which alleges that marathon and other defendants violated the false claims act with respect to the reporting and payment of royalties on natural gas and natural gas liquids for federal and indian leases . a qui tam action is an action in which the relator files suit on behalf of himself as well as the federal government . the case currently pending is u.s . ex rel harrold e . wright v . agip petroleum co . et al . it is primarily a gas valuation case . marathon has reached a settlement with the relator and the doj which will be finalized after the indian tribes review and approve the settlement terms . such settlement is not expected to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows . guarantees 2013 we have provided certain guarantees , direct and indirect , of the indebtedness of other companies . under the terms of most of these guarantee arrangements , we would be required to perform should the guaranteed party fail to fulfill its obligations under the specified arrangements . in addition to these financial guarantees , we also have various performance guarantees related to specific agreements. .
Question: what was the change in the contingent rental liability from 2007 to 2009?
| -14.0 |
CONVFINQA_test722 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements of the $ 446 million present value of net minimum capital lease payments , $ 53 million was related to obligations assumed by united states steel under the financial matters agreement . operating lease rental expense was : ( in millions ) 2009 2008 2007 minimum rental ( a ) $ 238 $ 245 $ 209 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>minimum rental ( a )</td><td>$ 238</td><td>$ 245</td><td>$ 209</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>contingent rental</td><td>19</td><td>22</td><td>33</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net rental expense</td><td>$ 257</td><td>$ 267</td><td>$ 242</td></tr></table> ( a ) excludes $ 3 million , $ 5 million and $ 8 million paid by united states steel in 2009 , 2008 and 2007 on assumed leases . 26 . commitments and contingencies we are the subject of , or party to , a number of pending or threatened legal actions , contingencies and commitments involving a variety of matters , including laws and regulations relating to the environment . certain of these matters are discussed below . the ultimate resolution of these contingencies could , individually or in the aggregate , be material to our consolidated financial statements . however , management believes that we will remain a viable and competitive enterprise even though it is possible that these contingencies could be resolved unfavorably . environmental matters 2013 we are subject to federal , state , local and foreign laws and regulations relating to the environment . these laws generally provide for control of pollutants released into the environment and require responsible parties to undertake remediation of hazardous waste disposal sites . penalties may be imposed for noncompliance . at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 , accrued liabilities for remediation totaled $ 116 million and $ 111 million . it is not presently possible to estimate the ultimate amount of all remediation costs that might be incurred or the penalties that may be imposed . receivables for recoverable costs from certain states , under programs to assist companies in clean-up efforts related to underground storage tanks at retail marketing outlets , were $ 59 and $ 60 million at december 31 , 2009 and 2008 . legal cases 2013 we , along with other refining companies , settled a number of lawsuits pertaining to methyl tertiary-butyl ether ( 201cmtbe 201d ) in 2008 . presently , we are a defendant , along with other refining companies , in 27 cases arising in four states alleging damages for mtbe contamination . like the cases that we settled in 2008 , 12 of the remaining cases are consolidated in a multi-district litigation ( 201cmdl 201d ) in the southern district of new york for pretrial proceedings . the other 15 cases are in new york state courts ( nassau and suffolk counties ) . plaintiffs in 26 of the 27 cases allege damages to water supply wells from contamination of groundwater by mtbe , similar to the damages claimed in the cases settled in 2008 . in the remaining case , the new jersey department of environmental protection is seeking the cost of remediating mtbe contamination and natural resources damages allegedly resulting from contamination of groundwater by mtbe . we are vigorously defending these cases . we have engaged in settlement discussions related to the majority of these cases . we do not expect our share of liability for these cases to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows . we voluntarily discontinued producing mtbe in 2002 . we are currently a party to one qui tam case , which alleges that marathon and other defendants violated the false claims act with respect to the reporting and payment of royalties on natural gas and natural gas liquids for federal and indian leases . a qui tam action is an action in which the relator files suit on behalf of himself as well as the federal government . the case currently pending is u.s . ex rel harrold e . wright v . agip petroleum co . et al . it is primarily a gas valuation case . marathon has reached a settlement with the relator and the doj which will be finalized after the indian tribes review and approve the settlement terms . such settlement is not expected to significantly impact our consolidated results of operations , financial position or cash flows . guarantees 2013 we have provided certain guarantees , direct and indirect , of the indebtedness of other companies . under the terms of most of these guarantee arrangements , we would be required to perform should the guaranteed party fail to fulfill its obligations under the specified arrangements . in addition to these financial guarantees , we also have various performance guarantees related to specific agreements. .
Question: what was the change in the contingent rental liability from 2007 to 2009?
Answer: -14.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to that contingent rental liability in 2007?
| -0.42424 |
CONVFINQA_test723 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions of dollars )</td><td>pension plans 2018</td><td>pension plans 2017</td><td>pension plans 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 136</td><td>$ 110</td><td>$ 81</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>90</td><td>61</td><td>72</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-154 ( 154 )</td><td>-112 ( 112 )</td><td>-109 ( 109 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>amortization of prior service credit</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>amortization of loss</td><td>78</td><td>92</td><td>77</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>settlements</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net pension cost</td><td>$ 137</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 113</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans</td><td>$ 34</td><td>$ 43</td><td>$ 35</td></tr></table> net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .
Question: what was the pension service cost in 2018, in millions?
| 136.0 |
CONVFINQA_test724 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions of dollars )</td><td>pension plans 2018</td><td>pension plans 2017</td><td>pension plans 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 136</td><td>$ 110</td><td>$ 81</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>90</td><td>61</td><td>72</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-154 ( 154 )</td><td>-112 ( 112 )</td><td>-109 ( 109 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>amortization of prior service credit</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>amortization of loss</td><td>78</td><td>92</td><td>77</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>settlements</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net pension cost</td><td>$ 137</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 113</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans</td><td>$ 34</td><td>$ 43</td><td>$ 35</td></tr></table> net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .
Question: what was the pension service cost in 2018, in millions?
Answer: 136.0
Question: and what was it in 2017, also in millions?
| 110.0 |
CONVFINQA_test725 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions of dollars )</td><td>pension plans 2018</td><td>pension plans 2017</td><td>pension plans 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 136</td><td>$ 110</td><td>$ 81</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>90</td><td>61</td><td>72</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-154 ( 154 )</td><td>-112 ( 112 )</td><td>-109 ( 109 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>amortization of prior service credit</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>amortization of loss</td><td>78</td><td>92</td><td>77</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>settlements</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net pension cost</td><td>$ 137</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 113</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans</td><td>$ 34</td><td>$ 43</td><td>$ 35</td></tr></table> net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .
Question: what was the pension service cost in 2018, in millions?
Answer: 136.0
Question: and what was it in 2017, also in millions?
Answer: 110.0
Question: what was, then, in millions, the total pension service cost in the two years?
| 246.0 |
CONVFINQA_test726 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions of dollars )</td><td>pension plans 2018</td><td>pension plans 2017</td><td>pension plans 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 136</td><td>$ 110</td><td>$ 81</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>90</td><td>61</td><td>72</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-154 ( 154 )</td><td>-112 ( 112 )</td><td>-109 ( 109 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>amortization of prior service credit</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>amortization of loss</td><td>78</td><td>92</td><td>77</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>settlements</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net pension cost</td><td>$ 137</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 113</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans</td><td>$ 34</td><td>$ 43</td><td>$ 35</td></tr></table> net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .
Question: what was the pension service cost in 2018, in millions?
Answer: 136.0
Question: and what was it in 2017, also in millions?
Answer: 110.0
Question: what was, then, in millions, the total pension service cost in the two years?
Answer: 246.0
Question: including the year of 2015, what then becomes this total?
| 327.0 |
CONVFINQA_test727 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
note 8 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions of dollars )</td><td>pension plans 2018</td><td>pension plans 2017</td><td>pension plans 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>service cost</td><td>$ 136</td><td>$ 110</td><td>$ 81</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>interest cost</td><td>90</td><td>61</td><td>72</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected return on plan assets</td><td>-154 ( 154 )</td><td>-112 ( 112 )</td><td>-109 ( 109 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>amortization of prior service credit</td><td>-13 ( 13 )</td><td>-14 ( 14 )</td><td>-15 ( 15 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>amortization of loss</td><td>78</td><td>92</td><td>77</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>settlements</td><td>2</td><td>2014</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>net pension cost</td><td>$ 137</td><td>$ 138</td><td>$ 113</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans</td><td>$ 34</td><td>$ 43</td><td>$ 35</td></tr></table> net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 34 $ 43 $ 35 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2018 and 2016 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year. .
Question: what was the pension service cost in 2018, in millions?
Answer: 136.0
Question: and what was it in 2017, also in millions?
Answer: 110.0
Question: what was, then, in millions, the total pension service cost in the two years?
Answer: 246.0
Question: including the year of 2015, what then becomes this total?
Answer: 327.0
Question: and what was the average pension service cost between those three years, in millions?
| 109.0 |
CONVFINQA_test728 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
15 . debt the tables below summarize our outstanding debt at 30 september 2016 and 2015 : total debt . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>30 september</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 935.8</td><td>$ 1494.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>371.3</td><td>435.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>4918.1</td><td>3949.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 6225.2</td><td>$ 5879.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>30 september</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>bank obligations</td><td>$ 133.1</td><td>$ 234.3</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>commercial paper</td><td>802.7</td><td>1260.0</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 935.8</td><td>$ 1494.3</td></tr></table> the weighted average interest rate of short-term borrowings outstanding at 30 september 2016 and 2015 was 1.1% ( 1.1 % ) and .8% ( .8 % ) , respectively . cash paid for interest , net of amounts capitalized , was $ 121.1 in 2016 , $ 97.5 in 2015 , and $ 132.4 in 2014. .
Question: what was the total cash paid for interest in the years of 2015 and 2016, combined?
| 218.6 |
CONVFINQA_test729 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
15 . debt the tables below summarize our outstanding debt at 30 september 2016 and 2015 : total debt . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>30 september</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 935.8</td><td>$ 1494.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>371.3</td><td>435.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>4918.1</td><td>3949.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 6225.2</td><td>$ 5879.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>30 september</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>bank obligations</td><td>$ 133.1</td><td>$ 234.3</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>commercial paper</td><td>802.7</td><td>1260.0</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 935.8</td><td>$ 1494.3</td></tr></table> the weighted average interest rate of short-term borrowings outstanding at 30 september 2016 and 2015 was 1.1% ( 1.1 % ) and .8% ( .8 % ) , respectively . cash paid for interest , net of amounts capitalized , was $ 121.1 in 2016 , $ 97.5 in 2015 , and $ 132.4 in 2014. .
Question: what was the total cash paid for interest in the years of 2015 and 2016, combined?
Answer: 218.6
Question: including the year of 2014, what then becomes this total?
| 351.0 |
CONVFINQA_test730 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
15 . debt the tables below summarize our outstanding debt at 30 september 2016 and 2015 : total debt . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>30 september</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 935.8</td><td>$ 1494.3</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>current portion of long-term debt</td><td>371.3</td><td>435.6</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term debt</td><td>4918.1</td><td>3949.1</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total debt</td><td>$ 6225.2</td><td>$ 5879.0</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>short-term borrowings</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>30 september</td><td>2016</td><td>2015</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>bank obligations</td><td>$ 133.1</td><td>$ 234.3</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>commercial paper</td><td>802.7</td><td>1260.0</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total short-term borrowings</td><td>$ 935.8</td><td>$ 1494.3</td></tr></table> the weighted average interest rate of short-term borrowings outstanding at 30 september 2016 and 2015 was 1.1% ( 1.1 % ) and .8% ( .8 % ) , respectively . cash paid for interest , net of amounts capitalized , was $ 121.1 in 2016 , $ 97.5 in 2015 , and $ 132.4 in 2014. .
Question: what was the total cash paid for interest in the years of 2015 and 2016, combined?
Answer: 218.6
Question: including the year of 2014, what then becomes this total?
Answer: 351.0
Question: and what was the average cash paid for interest between those three years?
| 117.0 |
CONVFINQA_test731 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 62465</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>54236</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>47860</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>37660</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>28622</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>79800</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 310643</td></tr></table> rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 66.9 million , $ 57.2 million and $ 49.0 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . in connection with the acquisitions of several businesses , we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses , some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions , for the lease of certain properties used in our operations . typical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years , with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods . we also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property . lease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $ 1.0 million , $ 0.9 million and $ 0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2010 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 31.4 million . we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value . litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s . infringed on ford design patents . the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 . pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the u.s . of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s . design patent . we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell . the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income . we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business . we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .
Question: between the years of 2008 and 2009, what was the change in the rental expense?
| 8.2 |
CONVFINQA_test732 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 62465</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>54236</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>47860</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>37660</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>28622</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>79800</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 310643</td></tr></table> rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 66.9 million , $ 57.2 million and $ 49.0 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . in connection with the acquisitions of several businesses , we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses , some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions , for the lease of certain properties used in our operations . typical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years , with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods . we also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property . lease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $ 1.0 million , $ 0.9 million and $ 0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2010 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 31.4 million . we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value . litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s . infringed on ford design patents . the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 . pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the u.s . of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s . design patent . we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell . the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income . we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business . we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .
Question: between the years of 2008 and 2009, what was the change in the rental expense?
Answer: 8.2
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of that expense in 2008?
| 0.16735 |
CONVFINQA_test733 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 62465</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>54236</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>47860</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>37660</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>28622</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>79800</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 310643</td></tr></table> rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 66.9 million , $ 57.2 million and $ 49.0 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . in connection with the acquisitions of several businesses , we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses , some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions , for the lease of certain properties used in our operations . typical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years , with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods . we also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property . lease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $ 1.0 million , $ 0.9 million and $ 0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2010 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 31.4 million . we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value . litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s . infringed on ford design patents . the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 . pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the u.s . of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s . design patent . we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell . the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income . we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business . we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .
Question: between the years of 2008 and 2009, what was the change in the rental expense?
Answer: 8.2
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of that expense in 2008?
Answer: 0.16735
Question: and over the subsequent year, from 2009 to 2010, what was that change?
| 9.7 |
CONVFINQA_test734 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 62465</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>54236</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2013</td><td>47860</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2014</td><td>37660</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>2015</td><td>28622</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>thereafter</td><td>79800</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>future minimum lease payments</td><td>$ 310643</td></tr></table> rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 66.9 million , $ 57.2 million and $ 49.0 million during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . in connection with the acquisitions of several businesses , we entered into agreements with several sellers of those businesses , some of whom became stockholders as a result of those acquisitions , for the lease of certain properties used in our operations . typical lease terms under these agreements include an initial term of five years , with three to five five-year renewal options and purchase options at various times throughout the lease periods . we also maintain the right of first refusal concerning the sale of the leased property . lease payments to an employee who became an officer of the company after the acquisition of his business were approximately $ 1.0 million , $ 0.9 million and $ 0.9 million during each of the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2010 , the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 31.4 million . we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value . litigation and related contingencies in december 2005 and may 2008 , ford global technologies , llc filed complaints with the international trade commission against us and others alleging that certain aftermarket parts imported into the u.s . infringed on ford design patents . the parties settled these matters in april 2009 pursuant to a settlement arrangement that expires in september 2011 . pursuant to the settlement , we ( and our designees ) became the sole distributor in the u.s . of aftermarket automotive parts that correspond to ford collision parts that are covered by a u.s . design patent . we have paid ford an upfront fee for these rights and will pay a royalty for each such part we sell . the amortization of the upfront fee and the royalty expenses are reflected in cost of goods sold on the accompanying consolidated statements of income . we also have certain other contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business . we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .
Question: between the years of 2008 and 2009, what was the change in the rental expense?
Answer: 8.2
Question: and what is this change as a percentage of that expense in 2008?
Answer: 0.16735
Question: and over the subsequent year, from 2009 to 2010, what was that change?
Answer: 9.7
Question: what percentage does this 2009-2010 change represent in relation to the 2009 rental expense?
| 0.16958 |
CONVFINQA_test735 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations our management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) is provided in addition to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations , financial condition , and cash flows . md&a is organized as follows : 2022 overview . discussion of our business and overall analysis of financial and other highlights affecting the company in order to provide context for the remainder of md&a . 2022 critical accounting estimates . accounting estimates that we believe are most important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results and forecasts . 2022 results of operations . an analysis of our financial results comparing 2013 to 2012 and comparing 2012 to 2022 liquidity and capital resources . an analysis of changes in our balance sheets and cash flows , and discussion of our financial condition and potential sources of liquidity . 2022 fair value of financial instruments . discussion of the methodologies used in the valuation of our financial instruments . 2022 contractual obligations and off-balance-sheet arrangements . overview of contractual obligations , contingent liabilities , commitments , and off-balance-sheet arrangements outstanding as of december 28 , 2013 , including expected payment schedule . the various sections of this md&a contain a number of forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties . words such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201cintends , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cseeks , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201ccontinues , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cwill , 201d 201cshould , 201d and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements . in addition , any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance , our anticipated growth and trends in our businesses , uncertain events or assumptions , and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements . such statements are based on our current expectations and could be affected by the uncertainties and risk factors described throughout this filing and particularly in 201crisk factors 201d in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k . our actual results may differ materially , and these forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any divestitures , mergers , acquisitions , or other business combinations that had not been completed as of february 14 , 2014 . overview our results of operations for each period were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>three months ended dec . 282013</td><td>three months ended sept . 282013</td><td>three months ended change</td><td>three months ended dec . 282013</td><td>three months ended dec . 292012</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net revenue</td><td>$ 13834</td><td>$ 13483</td><td>$ 351</td><td>$ 52708</td><td>$ 53341</td><td>$ -633 ( 633 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 8571</td><td>$ 8414</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 31521</td><td>$ 33151</td><td>$ -1630 ( 1630 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>62.0% ( 62.0 % )</td><td>62.4% ( 62.4 % )</td><td>( 0.4 ) % ( % )</td><td>59.8% ( 59.8 % )</td><td>62.1% ( 62.1 % )</td><td>( 2.3 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating income</td><td>$ 3549</td><td>$ 3504</td><td>$ 45</td><td>$ 12291</td><td>$ 14638</td><td>$ -2347 ( 2347 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 2625</td><td>$ 2950</td><td>$ -325 ( 325 )</td><td>$ 9620</td><td>$ 11005</td><td>$ -1385 ( 1385 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>$ 0.51</td><td>$ 0.58</td><td>$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )</td><td>$ 1.89</td><td>$ 2.13</td><td>$ -0.24 ( 0.24 )</td></tr></table> revenue for 2013 was down 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 . pccg experienced lower platform unit sales in the first half of the year , but saw offsetting growth in the back half as the pc market began to show signs of stabilization . dcg continued to benefit from the build out of internet cloud computing and the strength of our product portfolio resulting in increased platform volumes for dcg for the year . higher factory start-up costs for our next-generation 14nm process technology led to a decrease in gross margin compared to 2012 . in response to the current business environment and to better align resources , management approved several restructuring actions including targeted workforce reductions as well as the exit of certain businesses and facilities . these actions resulted in restructuring and asset impairment charges of $ 240 million for 2013 . table of contents .
Question: what was the total of diluted earnings per common share as of december 2013?
| 1.89 |
CONVFINQA_test736 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations our management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) is provided in addition to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations , financial condition , and cash flows . md&a is organized as follows : 2022 overview . discussion of our business and overall analysis of financial and other highlights affecting the company in order to provide context for the remainder of md&a . 2022 critical accounting estimates . accounting estimates that we believe are most important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results and forecasts . 2022 results of operations . an analysis of our financial results comparing 2013 to 2012 and comparing 2012 to 2022 liquidity and capital resources . an analysis of changes in our balance sheets and cash flows , and discussion of our financial condition and potential sources of liquidity . 2022 fair value of financial instruments . discussion of the methodologies used in the valuation of our financial instruments . 2022 contractual obligations and off-balance-sheet arrangements . overview of contractual obligations , contingent liabilities , commitments , and off-balance-sheet arrangements outstanding as of december 28 , 2013 , including expected payment schedule . the various sections of this md&a contain a number of forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties . words such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201cintends , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cseeks , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201ccontinues , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cwill , 201d 201cshould , 201d and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements . in addition , any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance , our anticipated growth and trends in our businesses , uncertain events or assumptions , and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements . such statements are based on our current expectations and could be affected by the uncertainties and risk factors described throughout this filing and particularly in 201crisk factors 201d in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k . our actual results may differ materially , and these forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any divestitures , mergers , acquisitions , or other business combinations that had not been completed as of february 14 , 2014 . overview our results of operations for each period were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>three months ended dec . 282013</td><td>three months ended sept . 282013</td><td>three months ended change</td><td>three months ended dec . 282013</td><td>three months ended dec . 292012</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net revenue</td><td>$ 13834</td><td>$ 13483</td><td>$ 351</td><td>$ 52708</td><td>$ 53341</td><td>$ -633 ( 633 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 8571</td><td>$ 8414</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 31521</td><td>$ 33151</td><td>$ -1630 ( 1630 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>62.0% ( 62.0 % )</td><td>62.4% ( 62.4 % )</td><td>( 0.4 ) % ( % )</td><td>59.8% ( 59.8 % )</td><td>62.1% ( 62.1 % )</td><td>( 2.3 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating income</td><td>$ 3549</td><td>$ 3504</td><td>$ 45</td><td>$ 12291</td><td>$ 14638</td><td>$ -2347 ( 2347 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 2625</td><td>$ 2950</td><td>$ -325 ( 325 )</td><td>$ 9620</td><td>$ 11005</td><td>$ -1385 ( 1385 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>$ 0.51</td><td>$ 0.58</td><td>$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )</td><td>$ 1.89</td><td>$ 2.13</td><td>$ -0.24 ( 0.24 )</td></tr></table> revenue for 2013 was down 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 . pccg experienced lower platform unit sales in the first half of the year , but saw offsetting growth in the back half as the pc market began to show signs of stabilization . dcg continued to benefit from the build out of internet cloud computing and the strength of our product portfolio resulting in increased platform volumes for dcg for the year . higher factory start-up costs for our next-generation 14nm process technology led to a decrease in gross margin compared to 2012 . in response to the current business environment and to better align resources , management approved several restructuring actions including targeted workforce reductions as well as the exit of certain businesses and facilities . these actions resulted in restructuring and asset impairment charges of $ 240 million for 2013 . table of contents .
Question: what was the total of diluted earnings per common share as of december 2013?
Answer: 1.89
Question: and what was it as of december 2012?
| 2.13 |
CONVFINQA_test737 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations our management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) is provided in addition to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations , financial condition , and cash flows . md&a is organized as follows : 2022 overview . discussion of our business and overall analysis of financial and other highlights affecting the company in order to provide context for the remainder of md&a . 2022 critical accounting estimates . accounting estimates that we believe are most important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results and forecasts . 2022 results of operations . an analysis of our financial results comparing 2013 to 2012 and comparing 2012 to 2022 liquidity and capital resources . an analysis of changes in our balance sheets and cash flows , and discussion of our financial condition and potential sources of liquidity . 2022 fair value of financial instruments . discussion of the methodologies used in the valuation of our financial instruments . 2022 contractual obligations and off-balance-sheet arrangements . overview of contractual obligations , contingent liabilities , commitments , and off-balance-sheet arrangements outstanding as of december 28 , 2013 , including expected payment schedule . the various sections of this md&a contain a number of forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties . words such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201cintends , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cseeks , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201ccontinues , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cwill , 201d 201cshould , 201d and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements . in addition , any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance , our anticipated growth and trends in our businesses , uncertain events or assumptions , and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements . such statements are based on our current expectations and could be affected by the uncertainties and risk factors described throughout this filing and particularly in 201crisk factors 201d in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k . our actual results may differ materially , and these forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any divestitures , mergers , acquisitions , or other business combinations that had not been completed as of february 14 , 2014 . overview our results of operations for each period were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>three months ended dec . 282013</td><td>three months ended sept . 282013</td><td>three months ended change</td><td>three months ended dec . 282013</td><td>three months ended dec . 292012</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net revenue</td><td>$ 13834</td><td>$ 13483</td><td>$ 351</td><td>$ 52708</td><td>$ 53341</td><td>$ -633 ( 633 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 8571</td><td>$ 8414</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 31521</td><td>$ 33151</td><td>$ -1630 ( 1630 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>62.0% ( 62.0 % )</td><td>62.4% ( 62.4 % )</td><td>( 0.4 ) % ( % )</td><td>59.8% ( 59.8 % )</td><td>62.1% ( 62.1 % )</td><td>( 2.3 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating income</td><td>$ 3549</td><td>$ 3504</td><td>$ 45</td><td>$ 12291</td><td>$ 14638</td><td>$ -2347 ( 2347 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 2625</td><td>$ 2950</td><td>$ -325 ( 325 )</td><td>$ 9620</td><td>$ 11005</td><td>$ -1385 ( 1385 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>$ 0.51</td><td>$ 0.58</td><td>$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )</td><td>$ 1.89</td><td>$ 2.13</td><td>$ -0.24 ( 0.24 )</td></tr></table> revenue for 2013 was down 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 . pccg experienced lower platform unit sales in the first half of the year , but saw offsetting growth in the back half as the pc market began to show signs of stabilization . dcg continued to benefit from the build out of internet cloud computing and the strength of our product portfolio resulting in increased platform volumes for dcg for the year . higher factory start-up costs for our next-generation 14nm process technology led to a decrease in gross margin compared to 2012 . in response to the current business environment and to better align resources , management approved several restructuring actions including targeted workforce reductions as well as the exit of certain businesses and facilities . these actions resulted in restructuring and asset impairment charges of $ 240 million for 2013 . table of contents .
Question: what was the total of diluted earnings per common share as of december 2013?
Answer: 1.89
Question: and what was it as of december 2012?
Answer: 2.13
Question: what was, then, the change in that total over the year?
| -0.24 |
CONVFINQA_test738 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations our management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations ( md&a ) is provided in addition to the accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes to assist readers in understanding our results of operations , financial condition , and cash flows . md&a is organized as follows : 2022 overview . discussion of our business and overall analysis of financial and other highlights affecting the company in order to provide context for the remainder of md&a . 2022 critical accounting estimates . accounting estimates that we believe are most important to understanding the assumptions and judgments incorporated in our reported financial results and forecasts . 2022 results of operations . an analysis of our financial results comparing 2013 to 2012 and comparing 2012 to 2022 liquidity and capital resources . an analysis of changes in our balance sheets and cash flows , and discussion of our financial condition and potential sources of liquidity . 2022 fair value of financial instruments . discussion of the methodologies used in the valuation of our financial instruments . 2022 contractual obligations and off-balance-sheet arrangements . overview of contractual obligations , contingent liabilities , commitments , and off-balance-sheet arrangements outstanding as of december 28 , 2013 , including expected payment schedule . the various sections of this md&a contain a number of forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties . words such as 201canticipates , 201d 201cexpects , 201d 201cintends , 201d 201cplans , 201d 201cbelieves , 201d 201cseeks , 201d 201cestimates , 201d 201ccontinues , 201d 201cmay , 201d 201cwill , 201d 201cshould , 201d and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements . in addition , any statements that refer to projections of our future financial performance , our anticipated growth and trends in our businesses , uncertain events or assumptions , and other characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking statements . such statements are based on our current expectations and could be affected by the uncertainties and risk factors described throughout this filing and particularly in 201crisk factors 201d in part i , item 1a of this form 10-k . our actual results may differ materially , and these forward-looking statements do not reflect the potential impact of any divestitures , mergers , acquisitions , or other business combinations that had not been completed as of february 14 , 2014 . overview our results of operations for each period were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( dollars in millions except per share amounts )</td><td>three months ended dec . 282013</td><td>three months ended sept . 282013</td><td>three months ended change</td><td>three months ended dec . 282013</td><td>three months ended dec . 292012</td><td>change</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net revenue</td><td>$ 13834</td><td>$ 13483</td><td>$ 351</td><td>$ 52708</td><td>$ 53341</td><td>$ -633 ( 633 )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>gross margin</td><td>$ 8571</td><td>$ 8414</td><td>$ 157</td><td>$ 31521</td><td>$ 33151</td><td>$ -1630 ( 1630 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>gross margin percentage</td><td>62.0% ( 62.0 % )</td><td>62.4% ( 62.4 % )</td><td>( 0.4 ) % ( % )</td><td>59.8% ( 59.8 % )</td><td>62.1% ( 62.1 % )</td><td>( 2.3 ) % ( % )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>operating income</td><td>$ 3549</td><td>$ 3504</td><td>$ 45</td><td>$ 12291</td><td>$ 14638</td><td>$ -2347 ( 2347 )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net income</td><td>$ 2625</td><td>$ 2950</td><td>$ -325 ( 325 )</td><td>$ 9620</td><td>$ 11005</td><td>$ -1385 ( 1385 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>diluted earnings per common share</td><td>$ 0.51</td><td>$ 0.58</td><td>$ -0.07 ( 0.07 )</td><td>$ 1.89</td><td>$ 2.13</td><td>$ -0.24 ( 0.24 )</td></tr></table> revenue for 2013 was down 1% ( 1 % ) from 2012 . pccg experienced lower platform unit sales in the first half of the year , but saw offsetting growth in the back half as the pc market began to show signs of stabilization . dcg continued to benefit from the build out of internet cloud computing and the strength of our product portfolio resulting in increased platform volumes for dcg for the year . higher factory start-up costs for our next-generation 14nm process technology led to a decrease in gross margin compared to 2012 . in response to the current business environment and to better align resources , management approved several restructuring actions including targeted workforce reductions as well as the exit of certain businesses and facilities . these actions resulted in restructuring and asset impairment charges of $ 240 million for 2013 . table of contents .
Question: what was the total of diluted earnings per common share as of december 2013?
Answer: 1.89
Question: and what was it as of december 2012?
Answer: 2.13
Question: what was, then, the change in that total over the year?
Answer: -0.24
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2012 total of diluted earnings per common share, in percentage?
| -0.11268 |
CONVFINQA_test739 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
middleton's reported cigars shipment volume for 2012 decreased 0.7% ( 0.7 % ) due primarily to changes in trade inventories , partially offset by volume growth as a result of retail share gains . in the cigarette category , marlboro's 2012 retail share performance continued to benefit from the brand-building initiatives supporting marlboro's new architecture . marlboro's retail share for 2012 increased 0.6 share points versus 2011 to 42.6% ( 42.6 % ) . in january 2013 , pm usa expanded distribution of marlboro southern cut nationally . marlboro southern cut is part of the marlboro gold family . pm usa's 2012 retail share increased 0.8 share points versus 2011 , reflecting retail share gains by marlboro and by l&m in discount . these gains were partially offset by share losses on other portfolio brands . in the machine-made large cigars category , black & mild's retail share for 2012 increased 0.5 share points . the brand benefited from new untipped cigarillo varieties that were introduced in 2011 , black & mild seasonal offerings and the 2012 third-quarter introduction of black & mild jazz untipped cigarillos into select geographies . in december 2012 , middleton announced plans to launch nationally black & mild jazz cigars in both plastic tip and wood tip in the first quarter of 2013 . the following discussion compares smokeable products segment results for the year ended december 31 , 2011 with the year ended december 31 , 2010 . net revenues , which include excise taxes billed to customers , decreased $ 221 million ( 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) ) due to lower shipment volume ( $ 1051 million ) , partially offset by higher net pricing ( $ 830 million ) , which includes higher promotional investments . operating companies income increased $ 119 million ( 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) ) , due primarily to higher net pricing ( $ 831 million ) , which includes higher promotional investments , marketing , administration , and research savings reflecting cost reduction initiatives ( $ 198 million ) and 2010 implementation costs related to the closure of the cabarrus , north carolina manufacturing facility ( $ 75 million ) , partially offset by lower volume ( $ 527 million ) , higher asset impairment and exit costs due primarily to the 2011 cost reduction program ( $ 158 million ) , higher per unit settlement charges ( $ 120 million ) , higher charges related to tobacco and health judgments ( $ 87 million ) and higher fda user fees ( $ 73 million ) . for 2011 , total smokeable products shipment volume decreased 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) versus 2010 . pm usa's reported domestic cigarettes shipment volume declined 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) versus 2010 due primarily to retail share losses and one less shipping day , partially offset by changes in trade inventories . after adjusting for changes in trade inventories and one less shipping day , pm usa's 2011 domestic cigarette shipment volume was estimated to be down approximately 4% ( 4 % ) versus 2010 . pm usa believes that total cigarette category volume for 2011 decreased approximately 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) versus 2010 , when adjusted primarily for changes in trade inventories and one less shipping day . pm usa's total premium brands ( marlboro and other premium brands ) shipment volume decreased 4.3% ( 4.3 % ) . marlboro's shipment volume decreased 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) versus 2010 . in the discount brands , pm usa's shipment volume decreased 0.9% ( 0.9 % ) . pm usa's shipments of premium cigarettes accounted for 93.7% ( 93.7 % ) of its reported domestic cigarettes shipment volume for 2011 , down from 93.9% ( 93.9 % ) in 2010 . middleton's 2011 reported cigars shipment volume was unchanged versus 2010 . for 2011 , pm usa's retail share of the cigarette category declined 0.8 share points to 49.0% ( 49.0 % ) due primarily to retail share losses on marlboro . marlboro's 2011 retail share decreased 0.6 share points . in 2010 , marlboro delivered record full-year retail share results that were achieved at lower margin levels . middleton retained a leading share of the tipped cigarillo segment of the machine-made large cigars category , with a retail share of approximately 84% ( 84 % ) in 2011 . for 2011 , middleton's retail share of the cigar category increased 0.3 share points to 29.7% ( 29.7 % ) versus 2010 . black & mild's 2011 retail share increased 0.5 share points , as the brand benefited from new product introductions . during the fourth quarter of 2011 , middleton broadened its untipped cigarillo portfolio with new aroma wrap 2122 foil pouch packaging that accompanied the national introduction of black & mild wine . this new fourth- quarter packaging roll-out also included black & mild sweets and classic varieties . during the second quarter of 2011 , middleton entered into a contract manufacturing arrangement to source the production of a portion of its cigars overseas . middleton entered into this arrangement to access additional production capacity in an uncertain competitive environment and an excise tax environment that potentially benefits imported large cigars over those manufactured domestically . smokeless products segment the smokeless products segment's operating companies income grew during 2012 driven by higher pricing , copenhagen and skoal's combined volume and retail share performance and effective cost management . the following table summarizes smokeless products segment shipment volume performance : shipment volume for the years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( cans and packs in millions )</td><td>shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>copenhagen</td><td>392.5</td><td>354.2</td><td>327.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>skoal</td><td>288.4</td><td>286.8</td><td>274.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>copenhagenandskoal</td><td>680.9</td><td>641.0</td><td>601.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>82.4</td><td>93.6</td><td>122.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total smokeless products</td><td>763.3</td><td>734.6</td><td>724.4</td></tr></table> volume includes cans and packs sold , as well as promotional units , but excludes international volume , which is not material to the smokeless products segment . other includes certain usstc and pm usa smokeless products . new types of smokeless products , as well as new packaging configurations .
Question: during 2011, what percentage did the higher charges related to tobacco and health judgments represent in relation to the operating companies income increase?
| 0.73109 |
CONVFINQA_test740 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
middleton's reported cigars shipment volume for 2012 decreased 0.7% ( 0.7 % ) due primarily to changes in trade inventories , partially offset by volume growth as a result of retail share gains . in the cigarette category , marlboro's 2012 retail share performance continued to benefit from the brand-building initiatives supporting marlboro's new architecture . marlboro's retail share for 2012 increased 0.6 share points versus 2011 to 42.6% ( 42.6 % ) . in january 2013 , pm usa expanded distribution of marlboro southern cut nationally . marlboro southern cut is part of the marlboro gold family . pm usa's 2012 retail share increased 0.8 share points versus 2011 , reflecting retail share gains by marlboro and by l&m in discount . these gains were partially offset by share losses on other portfolio brands . in the machine-made large cigars category , black & mild's retail share for 2012 increased 0.5 share points . the brand benefited from new untipped cigarillo varieties that were introduced in 2011 , black & mild seasonal offerings and the 2012 third-quarter introduction of black & mild jazz untipped cigarillos into select geographies . in december 2012 , middleton announced plans to launch nationally black & mild jazz cigars in both plastic tip and wood tip in the first quarter of 2013 . the following discussion compares smokeable products segment results for the year ended december 31 , 2011 with the year ended december 31 , 2010 . net revenues , which include excise taxes billed to customers , decreased $ 221 million ( 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) ) due to lower shipment volume ( $ 1051 million ) , partially offset by higher net pricing ( $ 830 million ) , which includes higher promotional investments . operating companies income increased $ 119 million ( 2.1% ( 2.1 % ) ) , due primarily to higher net pricing ( $ 831 million ) , which includes higher promotional investments , marketing , administration , and research savings reflecting cost reduction initiatives ( $ 198 million ) and 2010 implementation costs related to the closure of the cabarrus , north carolina manufacturing facility ( $ 75 million ) , partially offset by lower volume ( $ 527 million ) , higher asset impairment and exit costs due primarily to the 2011 cost reduction program ( $ 158 million ) , higher per unit settlement charges ( $ 120 million ) , higher charges related to tobacco and health judgments ( $ 87 million ) and higher fda user fees ( $ 73 million ) . for 2011 , total smokeable products shipment volume decreased 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) versus 2010 . pm usa's reported domestic cigarettes shipment volume declined 4.0% ( 4.0 % ) versus 2010 due primarily to retail share losses and one less shipping day , partially offset by changes in trade inventories . after adjusting for changes in trade inventories and one less shipping day , pm usa's 2011 domestic cigarette shipment volume was estimated to be down approximately 4% ( 4 % ) versus 2010 . pm usa believes that total cigarette category volume for 2011 decreased approximately 3.5% ( 3.5 % ) versus 2010 , when adjusted primarily for changes in trade inventories and one less shipping day . pm usa's total premium brands ( marlboro and other premium brands ) shipment volume decreased 4.3% ( 4.3 % ) . marlboro's shipment volume decreased 3.8% ( 3.8 % ) versus 2010 . in the discount brands , pm usa's shipment volume decreased 0.9% ( 0.9 % ) . pm usa's shipments of premium cigarettes accounted for 93.7% ( 93.7 % ) of its reported domestic cigarettes shipment volume for 2011 , down from 93.9% ( 93.9 % ) in 2010 . middleton's 2011 reported cigars shipment volume was unchanged versus 2010 . for 2011 , pm usa's retail share of the cigarette category declined 0.8 share points to 49.0% ( 49.0 % ) due primarily to retail share losses on marlboro . marlboro's 2011 retail share decreased 0.6 share points . in 2010 , marlboro delivered record full-year retail share results that were achieved at lower margin levels . middleton retained a leading share of the tipped cigarillo segment of the machine-made large cigars category , with a retail share of approximately 84% ( 84 % ) in 2011 . for 2011 , middleton's retail share of the cigar category increased 0.3 share points to 29.7% ( 29.7 % ) versus 2010 . black & mild's 2011 retail share increased 0.5 share points , as the brand benefited from new product introductions . during the fourth quarter of 2011 , middleton broadened its untipped cigarillo portfolio with new aroma wrap 2122 foil pouch packaging that accompanied the national introduction of black & mild wine . this new fourth- quarter packaging roll-out also included black & mild sweets and classic varieties . during the second quarter of 2011 , middleton entered into a contract manufacturing arrangement to source the production of a portion of its cigars overseas . middleton entered into this arrangement to access additional production capacity in an uncertain competitive environment and an excise tax environment that potentially benefits imported large cigars over those manufactured domestically . smokeless products segment the smokeless products segment's operating companies income grew during 2012 driven by higher pricing , copenhagen and skoal's combined volume and retail share performance and effective cost management . the following table summarizes smokeless products segment shipment volume performance : shipment volume for the years ended december 31 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( cans and packs in millions )</td><td>shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2012</td><td>shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2011</td><td>shipment volumefor the years ended december 31 , 2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>copenhagen</td><td>392.5</td><td>354.2</td><td>327.5</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>skoal</td><td>288.4</td><td>286.8</td><td>274.4</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>copenhagenandskoal</td><td>680.9</td><td>641.0</td><td>601.9</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other</td><td>82.4</td><td>93.6</td><td>122.5</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total smokeless products</td><td>763.3</td><td>734.6</td><td>724.4</td></tr></table> volume includes cans and packs sold , as well as promotional units , but excludes international volume , which is not material to the smokeless products segment . other includes certain usstc and pm usa smokeless products . new types of smokeless products , as well as new packaging configurations .
Question: during 2011, what percentage did the higher charges related to tobacco and health judgments represent in relation to the operating companies income increase?
Answer: 0.73109
Question: and what percentage did the cost reduction initiatives represent in relation to them?
| 1.66387 |
CONVFINQA_test741 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the fourth quarter of 2010 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) guaranteed notes due under this program . schlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 2.56% ( 2.56 % ) . during the first quarter of 2009 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) guaranteed notes due 2014 under this program . schlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us dollar denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 4.95% ( 4.95 % ) . 0160 on april 17 , 2008 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an $ 8 billion share repurchase program for shares of schlumberger common stock , to be acquired in the open market before december 31 , 2011 . on july 21 , 2011 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an extension of this repurchase program to december 31 , 2013 . schlumberger had repurchased $ 7.12 billion of shares under this program as of december 31 , 2012 . the following table summarizes the activity under this share repurchase program during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 : ( stated in thousands except per share amounts ) total cost of shares purchased total number of shares purchased average price paid per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total cost of shares purchased</td><td>total number of shares purchased</td><td>average price paid per share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 971883</td><td>14087.8</td><td>$ 68.99</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 2997688</td><td>36940.4</td><td>$ 81.15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 1716675</td><td>26624.8</td><td>$ 64.48</td></tr></table> 0160 cash flow provided by operations was $ 6.8 billion in 2012 , $ 6.1 billion in 2011 and $ 5.5 billion in 2010 . in recent years , schlumberger has actively managed its activity levels in venezuela relative to its accounts receivable balance , and has recently experienced an increased delay in payment from its national oil company customer there . schlumberger operates in approximately 85 countries . at december 31 , 2012 , only five of those countries ( including venezuela ) individually accounted for greater than 5% ( 5 % ) of schlumberger 2019s accounts receivable balance of which only one , the united states , represented greater than 10% ( 10 % ) . 0160 dividends paid during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 were $ 1.43 billion , $ 1.30 billion and $ 1.04 billion , respectively . on january 17 , 2013 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 13.6% ( 13.6 % ) , to $ 0.3125 . on january 19 , 2012 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 0.275 . on january 21 , 2011 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 19% ( 19 % ) , to $ 0.25 . 0160 capital expenditures were $ 4.7 billion in 2012 , $ 4.0 billion in 2011 and $ 2.9 billion in 2010 . capital expenditures are expected to approach $ 3.9 billion for the full year 2013 . 0160 during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 schlumberger made contributions of $ 673 million , $ 601 million and $ 868 million , respectively , to its postretirement benefit plans . the us pension plans were 82% ( 82 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation . this compares to 87% ( 87 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 . schlumberger 2019s international defined benefit pension plans are a combined 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation . this compares to 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 . schlumberger currently anticipates contributing approximately $ 650 million to its postretirement benefit plans in 2013 , subject to market and business conditions . 0160 there were $ 321 million outstanding series b debentures at december 31 , 2009 . during 2010 , the remaining $ 320 million of the 2.125% ( 2.125 % ) series b convertible debentures due june 1 , 2023 were converted by holders into 8.0 million shares of schlumberger common stock and the remaining $ 1 million of outstanding series b debentures were redeemed for cash. .
Question: what is the net change in the cash flows from operations from 2011 to 2012?
| 0.7 |
CONVFINQA_test742 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the fourth quarter of 2010 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) guaranteed notes due under this program . schlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 2.56% ( 2.56 % ) . during the first quarter of 2009 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) guaranteed notes due 2014 under this program . schlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us dollar denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 4.95% ( 4.95 % ) . 0160 on april 17 , 2008 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an $ 8 billion share repurchase program for shares of schlumberger common stock , to be acquired in the open market before december 31 , 2011 . on july 21 , 2011 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an extension of this repurchase program to december 31 , 2013 . schlumberger had repurchased $ 7.12 billion of shares under this program as of december 31 , 2012 . the following table summarizes the activity under this share repurchase program during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 : ( stated in thousands except per share amounts ) total cost of shares purchased total number of shares purchased average price paid per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total cost of shares purchased</td><td>total number of shares purchased</td><td>average price paid per share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 971883</td><td>14087.8</td><td>$ 68.99</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 2997688</td><td>36940.4</td><td>$ 81.15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 1716675</td><td>26624.8</td><td>$ 64.48</td></tr></table> 0160 cash flow provided by operations was $ 6.8 billion in 2012 , $ 6.1 billion in 2011 and $ 5.5 billion in 2010 . in recent years , schlumberger has actively managed its activity levels in venezuela relative to its accounts receivable balance , and has recently experienced an increased delay in payment from its national oil company customer there . schlumberger operates in approximately 85 countries . at december 31 , 2012 , only five of those countries ( including venezuela ) individually accounted for greater than 5% ( 5 % ) of schlumberger 2019s accounts receivable balance of which only one , the united states , represented greater than 10% ( 10 % ) . 0160 dividends paid during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 were $ 1.43 billion , $ 1.30 billion and $ 1.04 billion , respectively . on january 17 , 2013 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 13.6% ( 13.6 % ) , to $ 0.3125 . on january 19 , 2012 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 0.275 . on january 21 , 2011 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 19% ( 19 % ) , to $ 0.25 . 0160 capital expenditures were $ 4.7 billion in 2012 , $ 4.0 billion in 2011 and $ 2.9 billion in 2010 . capital expenditures are expected to approach $ 3.9 billion for the full year 2013 . 0160 during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 schlumberger made contributions of $ 673 million , $ 601 million and $ 868 million , respectively , to its postretirement benefit plans . the us pension plans were 82% ( 82 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation . this compares to 87% ( 87 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 . schlumberger 2019s international defined benefit pension plans are a combined 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation . this compares to 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 . schlumberger currently anticipates contributing approximately $ 650 million to its postretirement benefit plans in 2013 , subject to market and business conditions . 0160 there were $ 321 million outstanding series b debentures at december 31 , 2009 . during 2010 , the remaining $ 320 million of the 2.125% ( 2.125 % ) series b convertible debentures due june 1 , 2023 were converted by holders into 8.0 million shares of schlumberger common stock and the remaining $ 1 million of outstanding series b debentures were redeemed for cash. .
Question: what is the net change in the cash flows from operations from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 0.7
Question: what is the cash flow from operations in 2011?
| 6.1 |
CONVFINQA_test743 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
during the fourth quarter of 2010 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) guaranteed notes due under this program . schlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 2.56% ( 2.56 % ) . during the first quarter of 2009 , schlumberger issued 20ac1.0 billion 4.50% ( 4.50 % ) guaranteed notes due 2014 under this program . schlumberger entered into agreements to swap these euro notes for us dollars on the date of issue until maturity , effectively making this a us dollar denominated debt on which schlumberger will pay interest in us dollars at a rate of 4.95% ( 4.95 % ) . 0160 on april 17 , 2008 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an $ 8 billion share repurchase program for shares of schlumberger common stock , to be acquired in the open market before december 31 , 2011 . on july 21 , 2011 , the schlumberger board of directors approved an extension of this repurchase program to december 31 , 2013 . schlumberger had repurchased $ 7.12 billion of shares under this program as of december 31 , 2012 . the following table summarizes the activity under this share repurchase program during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 : ( stated in thousands except per share amounts ) total cost of shares purchased total number of shares purchased average price paid per share . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total cost of shares purchased</td><td>total number of shares purchased</td><td>average price paid per share</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2012</td><td>$ 971883</td><td>14087.8</td><td>$ 68.99</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2011</td><td>$ 2997688</td><td>36940.4</td><td>$ 81.15</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2010</td><td>$ 1716675</td><td>26624.8</td><td>$ 64.48</td></tr></table> 0160 cash flow provided by operations was $ 6.8 billion in 2012 , $ 6.1 billion in 2011 and $ 5.5 billion in 2010 . in recent years , schlumberger has actively managed its activity levels in venezuela relative to its accounts receivable balance , and has recently experienced an increased delay in payment from its national oil company customer there . schlumberger operates in approximately 85 countries . at december 31 , 2012 , only five of those countries ( including venezuela ) individually accounted for greater than 5% ( 5 % ) of schlumberger 2019s accounts receivable balance of which only one , the united states , represented greater than 10% ( 10 % ) . 0160 dividends paid during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 were $ 1.43 billion , $ 1.30 billion and $ 1.04 billion , respectively . on january 17 , 2013 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 13.6% ( 13.6 % ) , to $ 0.3125 . on january 19 , 2012 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 10% ( 10 % ) , to $ 0.275 . on january 21 , 2011 , schlumberger announced that its board of directors had approved an increase in the quarterly dividend of 19% ( 19 % ) , to $ 0.25 . 0160 capital expenditures were $ 4.7 billion in 2012 , $ 4.0 billion in 2011 and $ 2.9 billion in 2010 . capital expenditures are expected to approach $ 3.9 billion for the full year 2013 . 0160 during 2012 , 2011 and 2010 schlumberger made contributions of $ 673 million , $ 601 million and $ 868 million , respectively , to its postretirement benefit plans . the us pension plans were 82% ( 82 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation . this compares to 87% ( 87 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 . schlumberger 2019s international defined benefit pension plans are a combined 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2012 based on the projected benefit obligation . this compares to 88% ( 88 % ) funded at december 31 , 2011 . schlumberger currently anticipates contributing approximately $ 650 million to its postretirement benefit plans in 2013 , subject to market and business conditions . 0160 there were $ 321 million outstanding series b debentures at december 31 , 2009 . during 2010 , the remaining $ 320 million of the 2.125% ( 2.125 % ) series b convertible debentures due june 1 , 2023 were converted by holders into 8.0 million shares of schlumberger common stock and the remaining $ 1 million of outstanding series b debentures were redeemed for cash. .
Question: what is the net change in the cash flows from operations from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 0.7
Question: what is the cash flow from operations in 2011?
Answer: 6.1
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.11475 |
CONVFINQA_test744 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
62 general mills amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss unrealized losses from interest rate cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , totaled $ 73.6 million after tax . these deferred losses are primarily related to interest rate swaps that we entered into in contemplation of future borrowings and other financ- ing requirements and that are being reclassified into net interest over the lives of the hedged forecasted transac- tions . unrealized losses from foreign currency cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , were $ 1.7 million after-tax . the net amount of pre-tax gains and losses in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , that we expect to be reclassified into net earnings within the next 12 months is $ 14.0 million of expense . credit-risk-related contingent features certain of our derivative instruments contain provisions that require us to maintain an investment grade credit rating on our debt from each of the major credit rat- ing agencies . if our debt were to fall below investment grade , the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request full collateralization on derivative instru- ments in net liability positions . the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position on may 27 , 2012 , was $ 19.9 million . we have posted col- lateral of $ 4.3 million in the normal course of business associated with these contracts . if the credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had been triggered on may 27 , 2012 , we would have been required to post an additional $ 15.6 million of collateral to counterparties . concentrations of credit and counterparty credit risk during fiscal 2012 , wal-mart stores , inc . and its affili- ates ( wal-mart ) accounted for 22 percent of our con- solidated net sales and 30 percent of our net sales in the u.s . retail segment . no other customer accounted for 10 percent or more of our consolidated net sales . wal- mart also represented 6 percent of our net sales in the international segment and 7 percent of our net sales in the bakeries and foodservice segment . as of may 27 , 2012 , wal-mart accounted for 26 percent of our u.s . retail receivables , 5 percent of our international receiv- ables , and 9 percent of our bakeries and foodservice receivables . the five largest customers in our u.s . retail segment accounted for 54 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales , the five largest customers in our international segment accounted for 26 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales , and the five largest customers in our bakeries and foodservice segment accounted for 46 percent of its fis- cal 2012 net sales . we enter into interest rate , foreign exchange , and cer- tain commodity and equity derivatives , primarily with a diversified group of highly rated counterparties . we continually monitor our positions and the credit rat- ings of the counterparties involved and , by policy , limit the amount of credit exposure to any one party . these transactions may expose us to potential losses due to the risk of nonperformance by these counterparties ; however , we have not incurred a material loss . we also enter into commodity futures transactions through vari- ous regulated exchanges . the amount of loss due to the credit risk of the coun- terparties , should the counterparties fail to perform according to the terms of the contracts , is $ 19.5 million against which we do not hold collateral . under the terms of master swap agreements , some of our transactions require collateral or other security to support financial instruments subject to threshold levels of exposure and counterparty credit risk . collateral assets are either cash or u.s . treasury instruments and are held in a trust account that we may access if the counterparty defaults . note 8 . debt notes payable the components of notes payable and their respective weighted-average interest rates at the end of the periods were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>may 27 2012 notes payable</td><td>may 27 2012 weighted- average interest rate</td><td>may 27 2012 notespayable</td><td>weighted-averageinterest rate</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . commercial paper</td><td>$ 412.0</td><td>0.2% ( 0.2 % )</td><td>$ 192.5</td><td>0.2% ( 0.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>financial institutions</td><td>114.5</td><td>10.0</td><td>118.8</td><td>11.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 526.5</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td><td>$ 311.3</td><td>4.5% ( 4.5 % )</td></tr></table> to ensure availability of funds , we maintain bank credit lines sufficient to cover our outstanding short- term borrowings . commercial paper is a continuing source of short-term financing . we have commercial paper programs available to us in the united states and europe . in april 2012 , we entered into fee-paid commit- ted credit lines , consisting of a $ 1.0 billion facility sched- uled to expire in april 2015 and a $ 1.7 billion facility .
Question: for the year ended on may 27, 2012, what was the total interest expense, in millions?
| 12.636 |
CONVFINQA_test745 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
62 general mills amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss unrealized losses from interest rate cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , totaled $ 73.6 million after tax . these deferred losses are primarily related to interest rate swaps that we entered into in contemplation of future borrowings and other financ- ing requirements and that are being reclassified into net interest over the lives of the hedged forecasted transac- tions . unrealized losses from foreign currency cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , were $ 1.7 million after-tax . the net amount of pre-tax gains and losses in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , that we expect to be reclassified into net earnings within the next 12 months is $ 14.0 million of expense . credit-risk-related contingent features certain of our derivative instruments contain provisions that require us to maintain an investment grade credit rating on our debt from each of the major credit rat- ing agencies . if our debt were to fall below investment grade , the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request full collateralization on derivative instru- ments in net liability positions . the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position on may 27 , 2012 , was $ 19.9 million . we have posted col- lateral of $ 4.3 million in the normal course of business associated with these contracts . if the credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had been triggered on may 27 , 2012 , we would have been required to post an additional $ 15.6 million of collateral to counterparties . concentrations of credit and counterparty credit risk during fiscal 2012 , wal-mart stores , inc . and its affili- ates ( wal-mart ) accounted for 22 percent of our con- solidated net sales and 30 percent of our net sales in the u.s . retail segment . no other customer accounted for 10 percent or more of our consolidated net sales . wal- mart also represented 6 percent of our net sales in the international segment and 7 percent of our net sales in the bakeries and foodservice segment . as of may 27 , 2012 , wal-mart accounted for 26 percent of our u.s . retail receivables , 5 percent of our international receiv- ables , and 9 percent of our bakeries and foodservice receivables . the five largest customers in our u.s . retail segment accounted for 54 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales , the five largest customers in our international segment accounted for 26 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales , and the five largest customers in our bakeries and foodservice segment accounted for 46 percent of its fis- cal 2012 net sales . we enter into interest rate , foreign exchange , and cer- tain commodity and equity derivatives , primarily with a diversified group of highly rated counterparties . we continually monitor our positions and the credit rat- ings of the counterparties involved and , by policy , limit the amount of credit exposure to any one party . these transactions may expose us to potential losses due to the risk of nonperformance by these counterparties ; however , we have not incurred a material loss . we also enter into commodity futures transactions through vari- ous regulated exchanges . the amount of loss due to the credit risk of the coun- terparties , should the counterparties fail to perform according to the terms of the contracts , is $ 19.5 million against which we do not hold collateral . under the terms of master swap agreements , some of our transactions require collateral or other security to support financial instruments subject to threshold levels of exposure and counterparty credit risk . collateral assets are either cash or u.s . treasury instruments and are held in a trust account that we may access if the counterparty defaults . note 8 . debt notes payable the components of notes payable and their respective weighted-average interest rates at the end of the periods were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>may 27 2012 notes payable</td><td>may 27 2012 weighted- average interest rate</td><td>may 27 2012 notespayable</td><td>weighted-averageinterest rate</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . commercial paper</td><td>$ 412.0</td><td>0.2% ( 0.2 % )</td><td>$ 192.5</td><td>0.2% ( 0.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>financial institutions</td><td>114.5</td><td>10.0</td><td>118.8</td><td>11.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 526.5</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td><td>$ 311.3</td><td>4.5% ( 4.5 % )</td></tr></table> to ensure availability of funds , we maintain bank credit lines sufficient to cover our outstanding short- term borrowings . commercial paper is a continuing source of short-term financing . we have commercial paper programs available to us in the united states and europe . in april 2012 , we entered into fee-paid commit- ted credit lines , consisting of a $ 1.0 billion facility sched- uled to expire in april 2015 and a $ 1.7 billion facility .
Question: for the year ended on may 27, 2012, what was the total interest expense, in millions?
Answer: 12.636
Question: and as of that same date, what was the amount of notes payable related to u.s . commercial paper?
| 412.0 |
CONVFINQA_test746 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
62 general mills amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss unrealized losses from interest rate cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , totaled $ 73.6 million after tax . these deferred losses are primarily related to interest rate swaps that we entered into in contemplation of future borrowings and other financ- ing requirements and that are being reclassified into net interest over the lives of the hedged forecasted transac- tions . unrealized losses from foreign currency cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , were $ 1.7 million after-tax . the net amount of pre-tax gains and losses in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , that we expect to be reclassified into net earnings within the next 12 months is $ 14.0 million of expense . credit-risk-related contingent features certain of our derivative instruments contain provisions that require us to maintain an investment grade credit rating on our debt from each of the major credit rat- ing agencies . if our debt were to fall below investment grade , the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request full collateralization on derivative instru- ments in net liability positions . the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position on may 27 , 2012 , was $ 19.9 million . we have posted col- lateral of $ 4.3 million in the normal course of business associated with these contracts . if the credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had been triggered on may 27 , 2012 , we would have been required to post an additional $ 15.6 million of collateral to counterparties . concentrations of credit and counterparty credit risk during fiscal 2012 , wal-mart stores , inc . and its affili- ates ( wal-mart ) accounted for 22 percent of our con- solidated net sales and 30 percent of our net sales in the u.s . retail segment . no other customer accounted for 10 percent or more of our consolidated net sales . wal- mart also represented 6 percent of our net sales in the international segment and 7 percent of our net sales in the bakeries and foodservice segment . as of may 27 , 2012 , wal-mart accounted for 26 percent of our u.s . retail receivables , 5 percent of our international receiv- ables , and 9 percent of our bakeries and foodservice receivables . the five largest customers in our u.s . retail segment accounted for 54 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales , the five largest customers in our international segment accounted for 26 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales , and the five largest customers in our bakeries and foodservice segment accounted for 46 percent of its fis- cal 2012 net sales . we enter into interest rate , foreign exchange , and cer- tain commodity and equity derivatives , primarily with a diversified group of highly rated counterparties . we continually monitor our positions and the credit rat- ings of the counterparties involved and , by policy , limit the amount of credit exposure to any one party . these transactions may expose us to potential losses due to the risk of nonperformance by these counterparties ; however , we have not incurred a material loss . we also enter into commodity futures transactions through vari- ous regulated exchanges . the amount of loss due to the credit risk of the coun- terparties , should the counterparties fail to perform according to the terms of the contracts , is $ 19.5 million against which we do not hold collateral . under the terms of master swap agreements , some of our transactions require collateral or other security to support financial instruments subject to threshold levels of exposure and counterparty credit risk . collateral assets are either cash or u.s . treasury instruments and are held in a trust account that we may access if the counterparty defaults . note 8 . debt notes payable the components of notes payable and their respective weighted-average interest rates at the end of the periods were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>may 27 2012 notes payable</td><td>may 27 2012 weighted- average interest rate</td><td>may 27 2012 notespayable</td><td>weighted-averageinterest rate</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . commercial paper</td><td>$ 412.0</td><td>0.2% ( 0.2 % )</td><td>$ 192.5</td><td>0.2% ( 0.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>financial institutions</td><td>114.5</td><td>10.0</td><td>118.8</td><td>11.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 526.5</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td><td>$ 311.3</td><td>4.5% ( 4.5 % )</td></tr></table> to ensure availability of funds , we maintain bank credit lines sufficient to cover our outstanding short- term borrowings . commercial paper is a continuing source of short-term financing . we have commercial paper programs available to us in the united states and europe . in april 2012 , we entered into fee-paid commit- ted credit lines , consisting of a $ 1.0 billion facility sched- uled to expire in april 2015 and a $ 1.7 billion facility .
Question: for the year ended on may 27, 2012, what was the total interest expense, in millions?
Answer: 12.636
Question: and as of that same date, what was the amount of notes payable related to u.s . commercial paper?
Answer: 412.0
Question: what was the full total of notes payable?
| 526.5 |
CONVFINQA_test747 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
62 general mills amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss unrealized losses from interest rate cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , totaled $ 73.6 million after tax . these deferred losses are primarily related to interest rate swaps that we entered into in contemplation of future borrowings and other financ- ing requirements and that are being reclassified into net interest over the lives of the hedged forecasted transac- tions . unrealized losses from foreign currency cash flow hedges recorded in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , were $ 1.7 million after-tax . the net amount of pre-tax gains and losses in aoci as of may 27 , 2012 , that we expect to be reclassified into net earnings within the next 12 months is $ 14.0 million of expense . credit-risk-related contingent features certain of our derivative instruments contain provisions that require us to maintain an investment grade credit rating on our debt from each of the major credit rat- ing agencies . if our debt were to fall below investment grade , the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request full collateralization on derivative instru- ments in net liability positions . the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position on may 27 , 2012 , was $ 19.9 million . we have posted col- lateral of $ 4.3 million in the normal course of business associated with these contracts . if the credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements had been triggered on may 27 , 2012 , we would have been required to post an additional $ 15.6 million of collateral to counterparties . concentrations of credit and counterparty credit risk during fiscal 2012 , wal-mart stores , inc . and its affili- ates ( wal-mart ) accounted for 22 percent of our con- solidated net sales and 30 percent of our net sales in the u.s . retail segment . no other customer accounted for 10 percent or more of our consolidated net sales . wal- mart also represented 6 percent of our net sales in the international segment and 7 percent of our net sales in the bakeries and foodservice segment . as of may 27 , 2012 , wal-mart accounted for 26 percent of our u.s . retail receivables , 5 percent of our international receiv- ables , and 9 percent of our bakeries and foodservice receivables . the five largest customers in our u.s . retail segment accounted for 54 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales , the five largest customers in our international segment accounted for 26 percent of its fiscal 2012 net sales , and the five largest customers in our bakeries and foodservice segment accounted for 46 percent of its fis- cal 2012 net sales . we enter into interest rate , foreign exchange , and cer- tain commodity and equity derivatives , primarily with a diversified group of highly rated counterparties . we continually monitor our positions and the credit rat- ings of the counterparties involved and , by policy , limit the amount of credit exposure to any one party . these transactions may expose us to potential losses due to the risk of nonperformance by these counterparties ; however , we have not incurred a material loss . we also enter into commodity futures transactions through vari- ous regulated exchanges . the amount of loss due to the credit risk of the coun- terparties , should the counterparties fail to perform according to the terms of the contracts , is $ 19.5 million against which we do not hold collateral . under the terms of master swap agreements , some of our transactions require collateral or other security to support financial instruments subject to threshold levels of exposure and counterparty credit risk . collateral assets are either cash or u.s . treasury instruments and are held in a trust account that we may access if the counterparty defaults . note 8 . debt notes payable the components of notes payable and their respective weighted-average interest rates at the end of the periods were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions</td><td>may 27 2012 notes payable</td><td>may 27 2012 weighted- average interest rate</td><td>may 27 2012 notespayable</td><td>weighted-averageinterest rate</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>u.s . commercial paper</td><td>$ 412.0</td><td>0.2% ( 0.2 % )</td><td>$ 192.5</td><td>0.2% ( 0.2 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>financial institutions</td><td>114.5</td><td>10.0</td><td>118.8</td><td>11.5</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total</td><td>$ 526.5</td><td>2.4% ( 2.4 % )</td><td>$ 311.3</td><td>4.5% ( 4.5 % )</td></tr></table> to ensure availability of funds , we maintain bank credit lines sufficient to cover our outstanding short- term borrowings . commercial paper is a continuing source of short-term financing . we have commercial paper programs available to us in the united states and europe . in april 2012 , we entered into fee-paid commit- ted credit lines , consisting of a $ 1.0 billion facility sched- uled to expire in april 2015 and a $ 1.7 billion facility .
Question: for the year ended on may 27, 2012, what was the total interest expense, in millions?
Answer: 12.636
Question: and as of that same date, what was the amount of notes payable related to u.s . commercial paper?
Answer: 412.0
Question: what was the full total of notes payable?
Answer: 526.5
Question: how much, then, in relation to this total did that amount represent?
| 0.78253 |
CONVFINQA_test748 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the fair value of the psu award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period , which is typically three years after the date of the award , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . as of december 31 , 2017 , pmi had $ 34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested psu awards . this cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle period of two years , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 , there were no psu awards that vested . pmi did not grant any psu awards during note 10 . earnings per share : unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in pmi 2019s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method . basic and diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) were calculated using the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings attributable to pmi</td><td>$ 6035</td><td>$ 6967</td><td>$ 6873</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards</td><td>14</td><td>19</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net earnings for basic and diluted eps</td><td>$ 6021</td><td>$ 6948</td><td>$ 6849</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted-average shares for basic eps</td><td>1552</td><td>1551</td><td>1549</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>plus contingently issuable performance stock units ( psus )</td><td>1</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted-average shares for diluted eps</td><td>1553</td><td>1551</td><td>1549</td></tr></table> for the 2017 , 2016 and 2015 computations , there were no antidilutive stock options. .
Question: what was the net change in value of net earnings attributable to pmi from 2016 to 2017?
| -932.0 |
CONVFINQA_test749 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the fair value of the psu award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period , which is typically three years after the date of the award , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . as of december 31 , 2017 , pmi had $ 34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested psu awards . this cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle period of two years , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 , there were no psu awards that vested . pmi did not grant any psu awards during note 10 . earnings per share : unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in pmi 2019s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method . basic and diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) were calculated using the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings attributable to pmi</td><td>$ 6035</td><td>$ 6967</td><td>$ 6873</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards</td><td>14</td><td>19</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net earnings for basic and diluted eps</td><td>$ 6021</td><td>$ 6948</td><td>$ 6849</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted-average shares for basic eps</td><td>1552</td><td>1551</td><td>1549</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>plus contingently issuable performance stock units ( psus )</td><td>1</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted-average shares for diluted eps</td><td>1553</td><td>1551</td><td>1549</td></tr></table> for the 2017 , 2016 and 2015 computations , there were no antidilutive stock options. .
Question: what was the net change in value of net earnings attributable to pmi from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: -932.0
Question: what was the 2016 value?
| 6967.0 |
CONVFINQA_test750 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the fair value of the psu award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period , which is typically three years after the date of the award , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . as of december 31 , 2017 , pmi had $ 34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested psu awards . this cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle period of two years , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 , there were no psu awards that vested . pmi did not grant any psu awards during note 10 . earnings per share : unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in pmi 2019s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method . basic and diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) were calculated using the following: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2017</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2016</td><td>for the years ended december 31 , 2015</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net earnings attributable to pmi</td><td>$ 6035</td><td>$ 6967</td><td>$ 6873</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards</td><td>14</td><td>19</td><td>24</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net earnings for basic and diluted eps</td><td>$ 6021</td><td>$ 6948</td><td>$ 6849</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>weighted-average shares for basic eps</td><td>1552</td><td>1551</td><td>1549</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>plus contingently issuable performance stock units ( psus )</td><td>1</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>weighted-average shares for diluted eps</td><td>1553</td><td>1551</td><td>1549</td></tr></table> for the 2017 , 2016 and 2015 computations , there were no antidilutive stock options. .
Question: what was the net change in value of net earnings attributable to pmi from 2016 to 2017?
Answer: -932.0
Question: what was the 2016 value?
Answer: 6967.0
Question: what is the change over the 2016 value?
| -0.13377 |
CONVFINQA_test751 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 83 credit risk capital credit risk capital is estimated separately for the wholesale business- es ( ib , cb , tss and am ) and consumer businesses ( rfs and cs ) . credit risk capital for the overall wholesale credit portfolio is defined in terms of unexpected credit losses , both from defaults and declines in the portfolio value due to credit deterioration , measured over a one-year period at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard . unexpected losses are losses in excess of those for which provisions for credit losses are maintained . the capital methodology is based upon several principal drivers of credit risk : exposure at default ( or loan-equivalent amount ) , default likelihood , credit spreads , loss severity and portfolio correlation . credit risk capital for the consumer portfolio is based upon product and other relevant risk segmentation . actual segment level default and severity experience are used to estimate unexpected losses for a one-year horizon at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard . statistical results for certain segments or portfolios are adjusted to ensure that capital is consistent with external bench- marks , such as subordination levels on market transactions or capital held at representative monoline competitors , where appropriate . market risk capital the firm calculates market risk capital guided by the principle that capital should reflect the risk of loss in the value of portfolios and financial instruments caused by adverse movements in market vari- ables , such as interest and foreign exchange rates , credit spreads , securities prices and commodities prices . daily value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) , biweekly stress-test results and other factors are used to determine appropriate capital levels . the firm allocates market risk capital to each business segment according to a formula that weights that seg- ment 2019s var and stress-test exposures . see market risk management on pages 111 2013116 of this annual report for more information about these market risk measures . operational risk capital capital is allocated to the lines of business for operational risk using a risk-based capital allocation methodology which estimates opera- tional risk on a bottom-up basis . the operational risk capital model is based upon actual losses and potential scenario-based stress losses , with adjustments to the capital calculation to reflect changes in the quality of the control environment or the use of risk-transfer prod- ucts . the firm believes its model is consistent with the new basel ii framework . private equity risk capital capital is allocated to privately and publicly held securities , third-party fund investments and commitments in the private equity portfolio to cover the potential loss associated with a decline in equity markets and related asset devaluations . in addition to negative market fluctua- tions , potential losses in private equity investment portfolios can be magnified by liquidity risk . the capital allocation for the private equity portfolio is based upon measurement of the loss experience suffered by the firm and other market participants over a prolonged period of adverse equity market conditions . regulatory capital the board of governors of the federal reserve system ( the 201cfederal reserve 201d ) establishes capital requirements , including well-capitalized standards for the consolidated financial holding company . the office of the comptroller of the currency ( 201cocc 201d ) establishes similar capital requirements and standards for the firm 2019s national banks , including jpmorgan chase bank , n.a. , and chase bank usa , n.a . the federal reserve granted the firm , for a period of 18 months fol- lowing the bear stearns merger , relief up to a certain specified amount and subject to certain conditions from the federal reserve 2019s risk-based capital and leverage requirements with respect to bear stearns 2019 risk-weighted assets and other exposures acquired . the amount of such relief is subject to reduction by one-sixth each quarter subsequent to the merger and expires on october 1 , 2009 . the occ granted jpmorgan chase bank , n.a . similar relief from its risk-based capital and leverage requirements . jpmorgan chase maintained a well-capitalized position , based upon tier 1 and total capital ratios at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , as indicated in the tables below . for more information , see note 30 on pages 212 2013213 of this annual report . risk-based capital components and assets . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total tier 1capital ( a )</td><td>$ 136104</td><td>$ 88746</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total tier 2 capital</td><td>48616</td><td>43496</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total capital</td><td>$ 184720</td><td>$ 132242</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>risk-weighted assets</td><td>$ 1244659</td><td>$ 1051879</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total adjusted average assets</td><td>1966895</td><td>1473541</td></tr></table> ( a ) the fasb has been deliberating certain amendments to both sfas 140 and fin 46r that may impact the accounting for transactions that involve qspes and vies . based on the provisions of the current proposal and the firm 2019s interpretation of the propos- al , the firm estimates that the impact of consolidation could be up to $ 70 billion of credit card receivables , $ 40 billion of assets related to firm-sponsored multi-seller conduits , and $ 50 billion of other loans ( including residential mortgages ) ; the decrease in the tier 1 capital ratio could be approximately 80 basis points . the ulti- mate impact could differ significantly due to the fasb 2019s continuing deliberations on the final requirements of the rule and market conditions. .
Question: in 2008, what percentage did the tier 2 capital represent in relation to the total one?
| 0.26319 |
CONVFINQA_test752 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
jpmorgan chase & co . / 2008 annual report 83 credit risk capital credit risk capital is estimated separately for the wholesale business- es ( ib , cb , tss and am ) and consumer businesses ( rfs and cs ) . credit risk capital for the overall wholesale credit portfolio is defined in terms of unexpected credit losses , both from defaults and declines in the portfolio value due to credit deterioration , measured over a one-year period at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard . unexpected losses are losses in excess of those for which provisions for credit losses are maintained . the capital methodology is based upon several principal drivers of credit risk : exposure at default ( or loan-equivalent amount ) , default likelihood , credit spreads , loss severity and portfolio correlation . credit risk capital for the consumer portfolio is based upon product and other relevant risk segmentation . actual segment level default and severity experience are used to estimate unexpected losses for a one-year horizon at a confidence level consistent with an 201caa 201d credit rating standard . statistical results for certain segments or portfolios are adjusted to ensure that capital is consistent with external bench- marks , such as subordination levels on market transactions or capital held at representative monoline competitors , where appropriate . market risk capital the firm calculates market risk capital guided by the principle that capital should reflect the risk of loss in the value of portfolios and financial instruments caused by adverse movements in market vari- ables , such as interest and foreign exchange rates , credit spreads , securities prices and commodities prices . daily value-at-risk ( 201cvar 201d ) , biweekly stress-test results and other factors are used to determine appropriate capital levels . the firm allocates market risk capital to each business segment according to a formula that weights that seg- ment 2019s var and stress-test exposures . see market risk management on pages 111 2013116 of this annual report for more information about these market risk measures . operational risk capital capital is allocated to the lines of business for operational risk using a risk-based capital allocation methodology which estimates opera- tional risk on a bottom-up basis . the operational risk capital model is based upon actual losses and potential scenario-based stress losses , with adjustments to the capital calculation to reflect changes in the quality of the control environment or the use of risk-transfer prod- ucts . the firm believes its model is consistent with the new basel ii framework . private equity risk capital capital is allocated to privately and publicly held securities , third-party fund investments and commitments in the private equity portfolio to cover the potential loss associated with a decline in equity markets and related asset devaluations . in addition to negative market fluctua- tions , potential losses in private equity investment portfolios can be magnified by liquidity risk . the capital allocation for the private equity portfolio is based upon measurement of the loss experience suffered by the firm and other market participants over a prolonged period of adverse equity market conditions . regulatory capital the board of governors of the federal reserve system ( the 201cfederal reserve 201d ) establishes capital requirements , including well-capitalized standards for the consolidated financial holding company . the office of the comptroller of the currency ( 201cocc 201d ) establishes similar capital requirements and standards for the firm 2019s national banks , including jpmorgan chase bank , n.a. , and chase bank usa , n.a . the federal reserve granted the firm , for a period of 18 months fol- lowing the bear stearns merger , relief up to a certain specified amount and subject to certain conditions from the federal reserve 2019s risk-based capital and leverage requirements with respect to bear stearns 2019 risk-weighted assets and other exposures acquired . the amount of such relief is subject to reduction by one-sixth each quarter subsequent to the merger and expires on october 1 , 2009 . the occ granted jpmorgan chase bank , n.a . similar relief from its risk-based capital and leverage requirements . jpmorgan chase maintained a well-capitalized position , based upon tier 1 and total capital ratios at december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , as indicated in the tables below . for more information , see note 30 on pages 212 2013213 of this annual report . risk-based capital components and assets . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>december 31 ( in millions )</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>total tier 1capital ( a )</td><td>$ 136104</td><td>$ 88746</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>total tier 2 capital</td><td>48616</td><td>43496</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total capital</td><td>$ 184720</td><td>$ 132242</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>risk-weighted assets</td><td>$ 1244659</td><td>$ 1051879</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total adjusted average assets</td><td>1966895</td><td>1473541</td></tr></table> ( a ) the fasb has been deliberating certain amendments to both sfas 140 and fin 46r that may impact the accounting for transactions that involve qspes and vies . based on the provisions of the current proposal and the firm 2019s interpretation of the propos- al , the firm estimates that the impact of consolidation could be up to $ 70 billion of credit card receivables , $ 40 billion of assets related to firm-sponsored multi-seller conduits , and $ 50 billion of other loans ( including residential mortgages ) ; the decrease in the tier 1 capital ratio could be approximately 80 basis points . the ulti- mate impact could differ significantly due to the fasb 2019s continuing deliberations on the final requirements of the rule and market conditions. .
Question: in 2008, what percentage did the tier 2 capital represent in relation to the total one?
Answer: 0.26319
Question: and how much did it represent in relation to the total of risk-weighted assets?
| 0.03906 |
CONVFINQA_test753 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a description of the company 2019s reporting units and the results of the related transitional impairment testing are as follows : verestar 2014verestar was a single segment and reporting unit until december 2002 , when the company committed to a plan to dispose of verestar . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 189.3 million relating to the impairment of goodwill in this reporting unit . the fair value of this reporting unit was determined based on an independent third party appraisal . network development services 2014as of january 1 , 2002 , the reporting units in the company 2019s network development services segment included kline , specialty constructors , galaxy , mts components and flash technologies . the company estimated the fair value of these reporting units utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information as to the value of each reporting unit on january 1 , 2002 . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 387.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 related to the impairment of goodwill within these reporting units . such charge included full impairment for all of the goodwill within the reporting units except kline , for which only a partial impairment was recorded . as discussed in note 2 , the assets of all of these reporting units were sold as of december 31 , 2003 , except for those of kline and our tower construction services unit , which were sold in march and november 2004 , respectively . rental and management 2014the company obtained an independent third party appraisal of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill and determined that goodwill was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired customer base and network location intangibles</td><td>$ 1369607</td><td>$ 1299521</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred financing costs</td><td>89736</td><td>111484</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired licenses and other intangibles</td><td>43404</td><td>43125</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>1502747</td><td>1454130</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-517444 ( 517444 )</td><td>-434381 ( 434381 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets net</td><td>$ 985303</td><td>$ 1019749</td></tr></table> the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 aggregated approximately $ 97.8 million and $ 94.6 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 97.8 million , $ 95.9 million , $ 92.0 million , $ 90.5 million and $ 88.8 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 and 2009 , respectively . 5 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2004 , and 2003 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv .
Question: what was the difference in amortization expense between 2008 and 2009?
| 1.9 |
CONVFINQA_test754 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a description of the company 2019s reporting units and the results of the related transitional impairment testing are as follows : verestar 2014verestar was a single segment and reporting unit until december 2002 , when the company committed to a plan to dispose of verestar . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 189.3 million relating to the impairment of goodwill in this reporting unit . the fair value of this reporting unit was determined based on an independent third party appraisal . network development services 2014as of january 1 , 2002 , the reporting units in the company 2019s network development services segment included kline , specialty constructors , galaxy , mts components and flash technologies . the company estimated the fair value of these reporting units utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information as to the value of each reporting unit on january 1 , 2002 . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 387.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 related to the impairment of goodwill within these reporting units . such charge included full impairment for all of the goodwill within the reporting units except kline , for which only a partial impairment was recorded . as discussed in note 2 , the assets of all of these reporting units were sold as of december 31 , 2003 , except for those of kline and our tower construction services unit , which were sold in march and november 2004 , respectively . rental and management 2014the company obtained an independent third party appraisal of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill and determined that goodwill was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired customer base and network location intangibles</td><td>$ 1369607</td><td>$ 1299521</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred financing costs</td><td>89736</td><td>111484</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired licenses and other intangibles</td><td>43404</td><td>43125</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>1502747</td><td>1454130</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-517444 ( 517444 )</td><td>-434381 ( 434381 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets net</td><td>$ 985303</td><td>$ 1019749</td></tr></table> the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 aggregated approximately $ 97.8 million and $ 94.6 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 97.8 million , $ 95.9 million , $ 92.0 million , $ 90.5 million and $ 88.8 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 and 2009 , respectively . 5 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2004 , and 2003 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv .
Question: what was the difference in amortization expense between 2008 and 2009?
Answer: 1.9
Question: so what was the percentage change?
| 0.01981 |
CONVFINQA_test755 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a description of the company 2019s reporting units and the results of the related transitional impairment testing are as follows : verestar 2014verestar was a single segment and reporting unit until december 2002 , when the company committed to a plan to dispose of verestar . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 189.3 million relating to the impairment of goodwill in this reporting unit . the fair value of this reporting unit was determined based on an independent third party appraisal . network development services 2014as of january 1 , 2002 , the reporting units in the company 2019s network development services segment included kline , specialty constructors , galaxy , mts components and flash technologies . the company estimated the fair value of these reporting units utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information as to the value of each reporting unit on january 1 , 2002 . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 387.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 related to the impairment of goodwill within these reporting units . such charge included full impairment for all of the goodwill within the reporting units except kline , for which only a partial impairment was recorded . as discussed in note 2 , the assets of all of these reporting units were sold as of december 31 , 2003 , except for those of kline and our tower construction services unit , which were sold in march and november 2004 , respectively . rental and management 2014the company obtained an independent third party appraisal of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill and determined that goodwill was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired customer base and network location intangibles</td><td>$ 1369607</td><td>$ 1299521</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred financing costs</td><td>89736</td><td>111484</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired licenses and other intangibles</td><td>43404</td><td>43125</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>1502747</td><td>1454130</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-517444 ( 517444 )</td><td>-434381 ( 434381 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets net</td><td>$ 985303</td><td>$ 1019749</td></tr></table> the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 aggregated approximately $ 97.8 million and $ 94.6 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 97.8 million , $ 95.9 million , $ 92.0 million , $ 90.5 million and $ 88.8 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 and 2009 , respectively . 5 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2004 , and 2003 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv .
Question: what was the difference in amortization expense between 2008 and 2009?
Answer: 1.9
Question: so what was the percentage change?
Answer: 0.01981
Question: how much did the other intangible assets net change between 2003 and 2004?
| -34446.0 |
CONVFINQA_test756 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a description of the company 2019s reporting units and the results of the related transitional impairment testing are as follows : verestar 2014verestar was a single segment and reporting unit until december 2002 , when the company committed to a plan to dispose of verestar . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 189.3 million relating to the impairment of goodwill in this reporting unit . the fair value of this reporting unit was determined based on an independent third party appraisal . network development services 2014as of january 1 , 2002 , the reporting units in the company 2019s network development services segment included kline , specialty constructors , galaxy , mts components and flash technologies . the company estimated the fair value of these reporting units utilizing future discounted cash flows and market information as to the value of each reporting unit on january 1 , 2002 . the company recorded an impairment charge of $ 387.8 million for the year ended december 31 , 2002 related to the impairment of goodwill within these reporting units . such charge included full impairment for all of the goodwill within the reporting units except kline , for which only a partial impairment was recorded . as discussed in note 2 , the assets of all of these reporting units were sold as of december 31 , 2003 , except for those of kline and our tower construction services unit , which were sold in march and november 2004 , respectively . rental and management 2014the company obtained an independent third party appraisal of the rental and management reporting unit that contains goodwill and determined that goodwill was not impaired . the company 2019s other intangible assets subject to amortization consist of the following as of december 31 , ( in thousands ) : . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2004</td><td>2003</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>acquired customer base and network location intangibles</td><td>$ 1369607</td><td>$ 1299521</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>deferred financing costs</td><td>89736</td><td>111484</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>acquired licenses and other intangibles</td><td>43404</td><td>43125</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total</td><td>1502747</td><td>1454130</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>less accumulated amortization</td><td>-517444 ( 517444 )</td><td>-434381 ( 434381 )</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>other intangible assets net</td><td>$ 985303</td><td>$ 1019749</td></tr></table> the company amortizes its intangible assets over periods ranging from three to fifteen years . amortization of intangible assets for the years ended december 31 , 2004 and 2003 aggregated approximately $ 97.8 million and $ 94.6 million , respectively ( excluding amortization of deferred financing costs , which is included in interest expense ) . the company expects to record amortization expense of approximately $ 97.8 million , $ 95.9 million , $ 92.0 million , $ 90.5 million and $ 88.8 million , respectively , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2006 , 2007 , 2008 and 2009 , respectively . 5 . notes receivable in 2000 , the company loaned tv azteca , s.a . de c.v . ( tv azteca ) , the owner of a major national television network in mexico , $ 119.8 million . the loan , which initially bore interest at 12.87% ( 12.87 % ) , payable quarterly , was discounted by the company , as the fair value interest rate at the date of the loan was determined to be 14.25% ( 14.25 % ) . the loan was amended effective january 1 , 2003 to increase the original interest rate to 13.11% ( 13.11 % ) . as of december 31 , 2004 , and 2003 , approximately $ 119.8 million undiscounted ( $ 108.2 million discounted ) under the loan was outstanding and included in notes receivable and other long-term assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets . the term of the loan is seventy years ; however , the loan may be prepaid by tv .
Question: what was the difference in amortization expense between 2008 and 2009?
Answer: 1.9
Question: so what was the percentage change?
Answer: 0.01981
Question: how much did the other intangible assets net change between 2003 and 2004?
Answer: -34446.0
Question: so what was the percentage decline during this time?
| -0.03378 |
CONVFINQA_test757 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters , and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange under the symbol "apd." as of 31 october 2019 , there were 5166 record holders of our common stock . cash dividends on the company 2019s common stock are paid quarterly . it is our expectation that we will continue to pay cash dividends in the future at comparable or increased levels . the board of directors determines whether to declare dividends and the timing and amount based on financial condition and other factors it deems relevant . dividend information for each quarter of fiscal years 2019 and 2018 is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>first quarter</td><td>$ 1.10</td><td>$ .95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second quarter</td><td>1.16</td><td>1.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third quarter</td><td>1.16</td><td>1.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>1.16</td><td>1.10</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 4.58</td><td>$ 4.25</td></tr></table> purchases of equity securities by the issuer on 15 september 2011 , the board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 1.0 billion of our outstanding common stock . this program does not have a stated expiration date . we repurchase shares pursuant to rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , through repurchase agreements established with one or more brokers . there were no purchases of stock during fiscal year 2019 . at 30 september 2019 , $ 485.3 million in share repurchase authorization remained . additional purchases will be completed at the company 2019s discretion while maintaining sufficient funds for investing in its businesses and growth opportunities. .
Question: what percentage of the total dividend in 2019 is from the first quarter?
| 0.24017 |
CONVFINQA_test758 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters , and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange under the symbol "apd." as of 31 october 2019 , there were 5166 record holders of our common stock . cash dividends on the company 2019s common stock are paid quarterly . it is our expectation that we will continue to pay cash dividends in the future at comparable or increased levels . the board of directors determines whether to declare dividends and the timing and amount based on financial condition and other factors it deems relevant . dividend information for each quarter of fiscal years 2019 and 2018 is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>first quarter</td><td>$ 1.10</td><td>$ .95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second quarter</td><td>1.16</td><td>1.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third quarter</td><td>1.16</td><td>1.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>1.16</td><td>1.10</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 4.58</td><td>$ 4.25</td></tr></table> purchases of equity securities by the issuer on 15 september 2011 , the board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 1.0 billion of our outstanding common stock . this program does not have a stated expiration date . we repurchase shares pursuant to rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , through repurchase agreements established with one or more brokers . there were no purchases of stock during fiscal year 2019 . at 30 september 2019 , $ 485.3 million in share repurchase authorization remained . additional purchases will be completed at the company 2019s discretion while maintaining sufficient funds for investing in its businesses and growth opportunities. .
Question: what percentage of the total dividend in 2019 is from the first quarter?
Answer: 0.24017
Question: and what percentage of the total dividend in 2018 is from the first quarter?
| 0.22353 |
CONVFINQA_test759 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters , and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange under the symbol "apd." as of 31 october 2019 , there were 5166 record holders of our common stock . cash dividends on the company 2019s common stock are paid quarterly . it is our expectation that we will continue to pay cash dividends in the future at comparable or increased levels . the board of directors determines whether to declare dividends and the timing and amount based on financial condition and other factors it deems relevant . dividend information for each quarter of fiscal years 2019 and 2018 is summarized below: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2019</td><td>2018</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>first quarter</td><td>$ 1.10</td><td>$ .95</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second quarter</td><td>1.16</td><td>1.10</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third quarter</td><td>1.16</td><td>1.10</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fourth quarter</td><td>1.16</td><td>1.10</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>total</td><td>$ 4.58</td><td>$ 4.25</td></tr></table> purchases of equity securities by the issuer on 15 september 2011 , the board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 1.0 billion of our outstanding common stock . this program does not have a stated expiration date . we repurchase shares pursuant to rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , through repurchase agreements established with one or more brokers . there were no purchases of stock during fiscal year 2019 . at 30 september 2019 , $ 485.3 million in share repurchase authorization remained . additional purchases will be completed at the company 2019s discretion while maintaining sufficient funds for investing in its businesses and growth opportunities. .
Question: what percentage of the total dividend in 2019 is from the first quarter?
Answer: 0.24017
Question: and what percentage of the total dividend in 2018 is from the first quarter?
Answer: 0.22353
Question: what is, then, the difference between the 2019 percentage and this 2018 one?
| 0.01665 |
CONVFINQA_test760 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td><td>12/31/10</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ball corporation</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 110.86</td><td>$ 115.36</td><td>$ 107.58</td><td>$ 134.96</td><td>$ 178.93</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dj containers & packaging index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 112.09</td><td>$ 119.63</td><td>$ 75.00</td><td>$ 105.34</td><td>$ 123.56</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.80</td><td>$ 122.16</td><td>$ 76.96</td><td>$ 97.33</td><td>$ 111.99</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the price of ball corporation in 2010?
| 178.93 |
CONVFINQA_test761 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td><td>12/31/10</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ball corporation</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 110.86</td><td>$ 115.36</td><td>$ 107.58</td><td>$ 134.96</td><td>$ 178.93</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dj containers & packaging index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 112.09</td><td>$ 119.63</td><td>$ 75.00</td><td>$ 105.34</td><td>$ 123.56</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.80</td><td>$ 122.16</td><td>$ 76.96</td><td>$ 97.33</td><td>$ 111.99</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the price of ball corporation in 2010?
Answer: 178.93
Question: what is that less an initial $100 investment?
| 78.93 |
CONVFINQA_test762 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
page 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return analysis . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td><td>12/31/07</td><td>12/31/08</td><td>12/31/09</td><td>12/31/10</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>ball corporation</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 110.86</td><td>$ 115.36</td><td>$ 107.58</td><td>$ 134.96</td><td>$ 178.93</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dj containers & packaging index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 112.09</td><td>$ 119.63</td><td>$ 75.00</td><td>$ 105.34</td><td>$ 123.56</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 115.80</td><td>$ 122.16</td><td>$ 76.96</td><td>$ 97.33</td><td>$ 111.99</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td><td>copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td><td>copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the price of ball corporation in 2010?
Answer: 178.93
Question: what is that less an initial $100 investment?
Answer: 78.93
Question: what is that difference over 100?
| 0.7893 |
CONVFINQA_test763 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
oneok partners 2019 commodity price risk is estimated as a hypothetical change in the price of ngls , crude oil and natural gas at december 31 , 2008 , excluding the effects of hedging and assuming normal operating conditions . oneok partners 2019 condensate sales are based on the price of crude oil . oneok partners estimates the following : 2022 a $ 0.01 per gallon decrease in the composite price of ngls would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.2 million ; 2022 a $ 1.00 per barrel decrease in the price of crude oil would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.0 million ; and 2022 a $ 0.10 per mmbtu decrease in the price of natural gas would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 0.6 million . the above estimates of commodity price risk do not include any effects on demand for its services that might be caused by , or arise in conjunction with , price changes . for example , a change in the gross processing spread may cause a change in the amount of ethane extracted from the natural gas stream , impacting gathering and processing margins , ngl exchange revenues , natural gas deliveries , and ngl volumes shipped and fractionated . oneok partners is also exposed to commodity price risk primarily as a result of ngls in storage , the relative values of the various ngl products to each other , the relative value of ngls to natural gas and the relative value of ngl purchases at one location and sales at another location , known as basis risk . oneok partners utilizes fixed-price physical forward contracts to reduce earnings volatility related to ngl price fluctuations . oneok partners has not entered into any financial instruments with respect to its ngl marketing activities . in addition , oneok partners is exposed to commodity price risk as its natural gas interstate and intrastate pipelines collect natural gas from its customers for operations or as part of its fee for services provided . when the amount of natural gas consumed in operations by these pipelines differs from the amount provided by its customers , the pipelines must buy or sell natural gas , or store or use natural gas from inventory , which exposes oneok partners to commodity price risk . at december 31 , 2008 , there were no hedges in place with respect to natural gas price risk from oneok partners 2019 natural gas pipeline business . distribution our distribution segment uses derivative instruments to hedge the cost of anticipated natural gas purchases during the winter heating months to protect their customers from upward volatility in the market price of natural gas . gains or losses associated with these derivative instruments are included in , and recoverable through , the monthly purchased gas cost mechanism . energy services our energy services segment is exposed to commodity price risk , basis risk and price volatility arising from natural gas in storage , requirement contracts , asset management contracts and index-based purchases and sales of natural gas at various market locations . we minimize the volatility of our exposure to commodity price risk through the use of derivative instruments , which , under certain circumstances , are designated as cash flow or fair value hedges . we are also exposed to commodity price risk from fixed-price purchases and sales of natural gas , which we hedge with derivative instruments . both the fixed-price purchases and sales and related derivatives are recorded at fair value . fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities - the following table sets forth the fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities , excluding $ 21.0 million of net liabilities from derivative instruments declared as either fair value or cash flow hedges. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( thousands of dollars )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 25171</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>derivatives reclassified or otherwise settled during the period</td><td>-55874 ( 55874 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of new derivatives entered into during the period</td><td>236772</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other changes in fair value</td><td>52731</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2008 ( a )</td><td>$ 258800</td></tr></table> ( a ) - the maturiti es of derivatives are based on inject ion and withdrawal periods from april through m arc h , which is consistent with our business s trategy . the maturities are as fol lows : $ 225.0 mi llion matures through march 2009 , $ 33.9 mi llion matures through march 2012 and $ ( 0.1 ) mil lion matures through march 2014 . fair v alue com ponent of energy m arketing and risk m anagement assets and liabili ti es .
Question: what was the total net change in net fair value of derivatives outstanding between 2007 and 2008?
| 233629.0 |
CONVFINQA_test764 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
oneok partners 2019 commodity price risk is estimated as a hypothetical change in the price of ngls , crude oil and natural gas at december 31 , 2008 , excluding the effects of hedging and assuming normal operating conditions . oneok partners 2019 condensate sales are based on the price of crude oil . oneok partners estimates the following : 2022 a $ 0.01 per gallon decrease in the composite price of ngls would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.2 million ; 2022 a $ 1.00 per barrel decrease in the price of crude oil would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 1.0 million ; and 2022 a $ 0.10 per mmbtu decrease in the price of natural gas would decrease annual net margin by approximately $ 0.6 million . the above estimates of commodity price risk do not include any effects on demand for its services that might be caused by , or arise in conjunction with , price changes . for example , a change in the gross processing spread may cause a change in the amount of ethane extracted from the natural gas stream , impacting gathering and processing margins , ngl exchange revenues , natural gas deliveries , and ngl volumes shipped and fractionated . oneok partners is also exposed to commodity price risk primarily as a result of ngls in storage , the relative values of the various ngl products to each other , the relative value of ngls to natural gas and the relative value of ngl purchases at one location and sales at another location , known as basis risk . oneok partners utilizes fixed-price physical forward contracts to reduce earnings volatility related to ngl price fluctuations . oneok partners has not entered into any financial instruments with respect to its ngl marketing activities . in addition , oneok partners is exposed to commodity price risk as its natural gas interstate and intrastate pipelines collect natural gas from its customers for operations or as part of its fee for services provided . when the amount of natural gas consumed in operations by these pipelines differs from the amount provided by its customers , the pipelines must buy or sell natural gas , or store or use natural gas from inventory , which exposes oneok partners to commodity price risk . at december 31 , 2008 , there were no hedges in place with respect to natural gas price risk from oneok partners 2019 natural gas pipeline business . distribution our distribution segment uses derivative instruments to hedge the cost of anticipated natural gas purchases during the winter heating months to protect their customers from upward volatility in the market price of natural gas . gains or losses associated with these derivative instruments are included in , and recoverable through , the monthly purchased gas cost mechanism . energy services our energy services segment is exposed to commodity price risk , basis risk and price volatility arising from natural gas in storage , requirement contracts , asset management contracts and index-based purchases and sales of natural gas at various market locations . we minimize the volatility of our exposure to commodity price risk through the use of derivative instruments , which , under certain circumstances , are designated as cash flow or fair value hedges . we are also exposed to commodity price risk from fixed-price purchases and sales of natural gas , which we hedge with derivative instruments . both the fixed-price purchases and sales and related derivatives are recorded at fair value . fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities - the following table sets forth the fair value component of the energy marketing and risk management assets and liabilities , excluding $ 21.0 million of net liabilities from derivative instruments declared as either fair value or cash flow hedges. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>( thousands of dollars )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2007</td><td>$ 25171</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>derivatives reclassified or otherwise settled during the period</td><td>-55874 ( 55874 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>fair value of new derivatives entered into during the period</td><td>236772</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>other changes in fair value</td><td>52731</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>net fair value of derivatives outstanding at december 31 2008 ( a )</td><td>$ 258800</td></tr></table> ( a ) - the maturiti es of derivatives are based on inject ion and withdrawal periods from april through m arc h , which is consistent with our business s trategy . the maturities are as fol lows : $ 225.0 mi llion matures through march 2009 , $ 33.9 mi llion matures through march 2012 and $ ( 0.1 ) mil lion matures through march 2014 . fair v alue com ponent of energy m arketing and risk m anagement assets and liabili ti es .
Question: what was the total net change in net fair value of derivatives outstanding between 2007 and 2008?
Answer: 233629.0
Question: and the percentage change during this time?
| 9.28167 |
CONVFINQA_test765 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2008 : number of shares purchased average paid per share2 total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number of shares purchased</td><td>average price paid per share2</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs</td><td>maximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1-31</td><td>29704</td><td>$ 5.99</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1-30</td><td>4468</td><td>$ 3.24</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1-31</td><td>12850</td><td>$ 3.98</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total1</td><td>47022</td><td>$ 5.18</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> total1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47022 $ 5.18 2014 2014 1 consists of restricted shares of our common stock withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares during each month of the fourth quarter of 2008 ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . 2 the average price per month of the withheld shares was calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations for each month by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock withheld each month. .
Question: what was the total value of the shares purchased in october?
| 177926.96 |
CONVFINQA_test766 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2008 : number of shares purchased average paid per share2 total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number of shares purchased</td><td>average price paid per share2</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs</td><td>maximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1-31</td><td>29704</td><td>$ 5.99</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1-30</td><td>4468</td><td>$ 3.24</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1-31</td><td>12850</td><td>$ 3.98</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total1</td><td>47022</td><td>$ 5.18</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> total1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47022 $ 5.18 2014 2014 1 consists of restricted shares of our common stock withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares during each month of the fourth quarter of 2008 ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . 2 the average price per month of the withheld shares was calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations for each month by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock withheld each month. .
Question: what was the total value of the shares purchased in october?
Answer: 177926.96
Question: and what was it for november?
| 14476.32 |
CONVFINQA_test767 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2008 : number of shares purchased average paid per share2 total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number of shares purchased</td><td>average price paid per share2</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs</td><td>maximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1-31</td><td>29704</td><td>$ 5.99</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1-30</td><td>4468</td><td>$ 3.24</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1-31</td><td>12850</td><td>$ 3.98</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total1</td><td>47022</td><td>$ 5.18</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> total1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47022 $ 5.18 2014 2014 1 consists of restricted shares of our common stock withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares during each month of the fourth quarter of 2008 ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . 2 the average price per month of the withheld shares was calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations for each month by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock withheld each month. .
Question: what was the total value of the shares purchased in october?
Answer: 177926.96
Question: and what was it for november?
Answer: 14476.32
Question: how much does the october total value represent in relation to the november one?
| 12.2909 |
CONVFINQA_test768 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2008 : number of shares purchased average paid per share2 total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>total number of shares purchased</td><td>average price paid per share2</td><td>total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs</td><td>maximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>october 1-31</td><td>29704</td><td>$ 5.99</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>november 1-30</td><td>4468</td><td>$ 3.24</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>december 1-31</td><td>12850</td><td>$ 3.98</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>total1</td><td>47022</td><td>$ 5.18</td><td>2014</td><td>2014</td></tr></table> total1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47022 $ 5.18 2014 2014 1 consists of restricted shares of our common stock withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares during each month of the fourth quarter of 2008 ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . 2 the average price per month of the withheld shares was calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations for each month by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock withheld each month. .
Question: what was the total value of the shares purchased in october?
Answer: 177926.96
Question: and what was it for november?
Answer: 14476.32
Question: how much does the october total value represent in relation to the november one?
Answer: 12.2909
Question: and how much is that in percentage?
| 1229.08971 |
CONVFINQA_test769 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 15 . stockholders 2019 equity dividends the following table provides details of dividend payments , excluding dividend equivalent rights , in 2015 , 2016 , and 2017 under our board approved quarterly cash dividend policy : payment amount per share amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>paymentdate</td><td>amountper share</td><td>totalamount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 1.14</td><td>$ 170</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 1.16</td><td>$ 172</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 1.49</td><td>$ 216</td></tr></table> on november 2 , 2017 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.40 per share that was paid on january 26 , 2018 to stockholders of record on december 29 , 2017 , for an aggregate amount of $ 55 million . declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change . stock repurchases in september 2014 , our board of directors replaced a previous share repurchase authorization of up to $ 1 billion ( of which $ 816 million remained unused ) with an authorization for repurchases of up to $ 2 billion of our common shares exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , which expired on december 31 , 2016 . under the share repurchase authorization , shares may have been purchased from time to time at prevailing prices in the open market , by block purchases , through plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , or in privately-negotiated transactions ( including pursuant to accelerated share repurchase agreements with investment banks ) , subject to certain regulatory restrictions on volume , pricing , and timing . pursuant to the merger agreement , after july 2 , 2015 , we were prohibited from repurchasing any of our outstanding securities without the prior written consent of aetna , other than repurchases of shares of our common stock in connection with the exercise of outstanding stock options or the vesting or settlement of outstanding restricted stock awards . accordingly , as announced on july 3 , 2015 , we suspended our share repurchase program . on february 14 , 2017 , we and aetna agreed to mutually terminate the merger agreement . we also announced that the board had approved a new authorization for share repurchases of up to $ 2.25 billion of our common stock exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , expiring on december 31 , 2017 . on february 16 , 2017 , we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement , the february 2017 asr , with goldman , sachs & co . llc , or goldman sachs , to repurchase $ 1.5 billion of our common stock as part of the $ 2.25 billion share repurchase program referred to above . on february 22 , 2017 , we made a payment of $ 1.5 billion to goldman sachs from available cash on hand and received an initial delivery of 5.83 million shares of our common stock from goldman sachs based on the then current market price of humana common stock . the payment to goldman sachs was recorded as a reduction to stockholders 2019 equity , consisting of a $ 1.2 billion increase in treasury stock , which reflected the value of the initial 5.83 million shares received upon initial settlement , and a $ 300 million decrease in capital in excess of par value , which reflected the value of stock held back by goldman sachs pending final settlement of the february 2017 asr . upon settlement of the february 2017 asr on august 28 , 2017 , we received an additional 0.84 million shares as determined by the average daily volume weighted-average share price of our common stock during the term of the agreement of $ 224.81 , bringing the total shares received under this program to 6.67 million . in addition , upon settlement we reclassified the $ 300 million value of stock initially held back by goldman sachs from capital in excess of par value to treasury stock . subsequent to settlement of the february 2017 asr , we repurchased an additional 3.04 million shares in the open market , utilizing the remaining $ 750 million of the $ 2.25 billion authorization prior to expiration. .
Question: what is the ratio of the payment amount per share, 2017 to 2016?
| 1.28448 |
CONVFINQA_test770 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) 15 . stockholders 2019 equity dividends the following table provides details of dividend payments , excluding dividend equivalent rights , in 2015 , 2016 , and 2017 under our board approved quarterly cash dividend policy : payment amount per share amount ( in millions ) . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>paymentdate</td><td>amountper share</td><td>totalamount ( in millions )</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>2015</td><td>$ 1.14</td><td>$ 170</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>2016</td><td>$ 1.16</td><td>$ 172</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>2017</td><td>$ 1.49</td><td>$ 216</td></tr></table> on november 2 , 2017 , the board declared a cash dividend of $ 0.40 per share that was paid on january 26 , 2018 to stockholders of record on december 29 , 2017 , for an aggregate amount of $ 55 million . declaration and payment of future quarterly dividends is at the discretion of our board and may be adjusted as business needs or market conditions change . stock repurchases in september 2014 , our board of directors replaced a previous share repurchase authorization of up to $ 1 billion ( of which $ 816 million remained unused ) with an authorization for repurchases of up to $ 2 billion of our common shares exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , which expired on december 31 , 2016 . under the share repurchase authorization , shares may have been purchased from time to time at prevailing prices in the open market , by block purchases , through plans designed to comply with rule 10b5-1 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , or in privately-negotiated transactions ( including pursuant to accelerated share repurchase agreements with investment banks ) , subject to certain regulatory restrictions on volume , pricing , and timing . pursuant to the merger agreement , after july 2 , 2015 , we were prohibited from repurchasing any of our outstanding securities without the prior written consent of aetna , other than repurchases of shares of our common stock in connection with the exercise of outstanding stock options or the vesting or settlement of outstanding restricted stock awards . accordingly , as announced on july 3 , 2015 , we suspended our share repurchase program . on february 14 , 2017 , we and aetna agreed to mutually terminate the merger agreement . we also announced that the board had approved a new authorization for share repurchases of up to $ 2.25 billion of our common stock exclusive of shares repurchased in connection with employee stock plans , expiring on december 31 , 2017 . on february 16 , 2017 , we entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement , the february 2017 asr , with goldman , sachs & co . llc , or goldman sachs , to repurchase $ 1.5 billion of our common stock as part of the $ 2.25 billion share repurchase program referred to above . on february 22 , 2017 , we made a payment of $ 1.5 billion to goldman sachs from available cash on hand and received an initial delivery of 5.83 million shares of our common stock from goldman sachs based on the then current market price of humana common stock . the payment to goldman sachs was recorded as a reduction to stockholders 2019 equity , consisting of a $ 1.2 billion increase in treasury stock , which reflected the value of the initial 5.83 million shares received upon initial settlement , and a $ 300 million decrease in capital in excess of par value , which reflected the value of stock held back by goldman sachs pending final settlement of the february 2017 asr . upon settlement of the february 2017 asr on august 28 , 2017 , we received an additional 0.84 million shares as determined by the average daily volume weighted-average share price of our common stock during the term of the agreement of $ 224.81 , bringing the total shares received under this program to 6.67 million . in addition , upon settlement we reclassified the $ 300 million value of stock initially held back by goldman sachs from capital in excess of par value to treasury stock . subsequent to settlement of the february 2017 asr , we repurchased an additional 3.04 million shares in the open market , utilizing the remaining $ 750 million of the $ 2.25 billion authorization prior to expiration. .
Question: what is the ratio of the payment amount per share, 2017 to 2016?
Answer: 1.28448
Question: what is that less 1?
| 0.28448 |
CONVFINQA_test771 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . the company 2019s common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange . prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company , the company 2019s common stock traded under the symbol 201caa . 201d in connection with the separation , on november 1 , 2016 , the company changed its stock symbol and its common stock began trading under the symbol 201carnc . 201d on october 5 , 2016 , the company 2019s common shareholders approved a 1-for-3 reverse stock split of the company 2019s outstanding and authorized shares of common stock ( the 201creverse stock split 201d ) . as a result of the reverse stock split , every three shares of issued and outstanding common stock were combined into one issued and outstanding share of common stock , without any change in the par value per share . the reverse stock split reduced the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 1.3 billion shares to approximately 0.4 billion shares , and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1.8 billion to 0.6 billion shares . the company 2019s common stock began trading on a reverse stock split-adjusted basis on october 6 , 2016 . on november 1 , 2016 , the company completed the separation of its business into two independent , publicly traded companies : the company and alcoa corporation . the separation was effected by means of a pro rata distribution by the company of 80.1% ( 80.1 % ) of the outstanding shares of alcoa corporation common stock to the company 2019s shareholders . the company 2019s shareholders of record as of the close of business on october 20 , 2016 ( the 201crecord date 201d ) received one share of alcoa corporation common stock for every three shares of the company 2019s common stock held as of the record date . the company retained 19.9% ( 19.9 % ) of the outstanding common stock of alcoa corporation immediately following the separation . see disposition of retained shares in note c to the consolidated financial statements in part ii item 8 of this form 10-k . the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low sales prices and quarterly dividend amounts per share of the company 2019s common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange , adjusted to take into account the reverse stock split effected on october 6 , 2016 . the prices listed below for those dates prior to november 1 , 2016 reflect stock trading prices of alcoa inc . prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company on november 1 , 2016 , and therefore are not comparable to the company 2019s post-separation prices. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>quarter</td><td>2017 high</td><td>2017 low</td><td>2017 dividend</td><td>2017 high</td><td>2017 low</td><td>dividend</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>first</td><td>$ 30.69</td><td>$ 18.64</td><td>$ 0.06</td><td>$ 30.66</td><td>$ 18.42</td><td>$ 0.09</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second</td><td>28.65</td><td>21.76</td><td>0.06</td><td>34.50</td><td>26.34</td><td>0.09</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third</td><td>26.84</td><td>22.67</td><td>0.06</td><td>32.91</td><td>27.09</td><td>0.09</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fourth ( separation occurred on november 1 2016 )</td><td>27.85</td><td>22.74</td><td>0.06</td><td>32.10</td><td>16.75</td><td>0.09</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>year</td><td>$ 30.69</td><td>$ 18.64</td><td>$ 0.24</td><td>$ 34.50</td><td>$ 16.75</td><td>$ 0.36</td></tr></table> the number of holders of record of common stock was approximately 12271 as of february 16 , 2018. .
Question: what is the ratio of common stock outstanding shares post split to prior?
| 0.30769 |
CONVFINQA_test772 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . the company 2019s common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange . prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company , the company 2019s common stock traded under the symbol 201caa . 201d in connection with the separation , on november 1 , 2016 , the company changed its stock symbol and its common stock began trading under the symbol 201carnc . 201d on october 5 , 2016 , the company 2019s common shareholders approved a 1-for-3 reverse stock split of the company 2019s outstanding and authorized shares of common stock ( the 201creverse stock split 201d ) . as a result of the reverse stock split , every three shares of issued and outstanding common stock were combined into one issued and outstanding share of common stock , without any change in the par value per share . the reverse stock split reduced the number of shares of common stock outstanding from approximately 1.3 billion shares to approximately 0.4 billion shares , and proportionately decreased the number of authorized shares of common stock from 1.8 billion to 0.6 billion shares . the company 2019s common stock began trading on a reverse stock split-adjusted basis on october 6 , 2016 . on november 1 , 2016 , the company completed the separation of its business into two independent , publicly traded companies : the company and alcoa corporation . the separation was effected by means of a pro rata distribution by the company of 80.1% ( 80.1 % ) of the outstanding shares of alcoa corporation common stock to the company 2019s shareholders . the company 2019s shareholders of record as of the close of business on october 20 , 2016 ( the 201crecord date 201d ) received one share of alcoa corporation common stock for every three shares of the company 2019s common stock held as of the record date . the company retained 19.9% ( 19.9 % ) of the outstanding common stock of alcoa corporation immediately following the separation . see disposition of retained shares in note c to the consolidated financial statements in part ii item 8 of this form 10-k . the following table sets forth , for the periods indicated , the high and low sales prices and quarterly dividend amounts per share of the company 2019s common stock as reported on the new york stock exchange , adjusted to take into account the reverse stock split effected on october 6 , 2016 . the prices listed below for those dates prior to november 1 , 2016 reflect stock trading prices of alcoa inc . prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company on november 1 , 2016 , and therefore are not comparable to the company 2019s post-separation prices. . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>quarter</td><td>2017 high</td><td>2017 low</td><td>2017 dividend</td><td>2017 high</td><td>2017 low</td><td>dividend</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>first</td><td>$ 30.69</td><td>$ 18.64</td><td>$ 0.06</td><td>$ 30.66</td><td>$ 18.42</td><td>$ 0.09</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>second</td><td>28.65</td><td>21.76</td><td>0.06</td><td>34.50</td><td>26.34</td><td>0.09</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>third</td><td>26.84</td><td>22.67</td><td>0.06</td><td>32.91</td><td>27.09</td><td>0.09</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>fourth ( separation occurred on november 1 2016 )</td><td>27.85</td><td>22.74</td><td>0.06</td><td>32.10</td><td>16.75</td><td>0.09</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>year</td><td>$ 30.69</td><td>$ 18.64</td><td>$ 0.24</td><td>$ 34.50</td><td>$ 16.75</td><td>$ 0.36</td></tr></table> the number of holders of record of common stock was approximately 12271 as of february 16 , 2018. .
Question: what is the ratio of common stock outstanding shares post split to prior?
Answer: 0.30769
Question: what is 1 less that quotient?
| 0.69231 |
CONVFINQA_test773 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 99832</td><td>$ 81881</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortized cost</td><td>100013</td><td>82329</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net unrealized loss pre-tax</td><td>$ -181 ( 181 )</td><td>$ -448 ( 448 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net unrealized loss after-tax</td><td>$ -113 ( 113 )</td><td>$ -270 ( 270 )</td></tr></table> the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity . these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci . refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 . the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization . we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists . to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component . the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security . our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors . such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance . to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income . given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s . housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance . as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices . generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears . as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current . overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough . the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate . in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above . the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations . our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses . ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security . in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s . residential mortgage-backed portfolio . we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above . this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults . to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated . excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .
Question: what was the fair value in 2011?
| 99832.0 |
CONVFINQA_test774 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 99832</td><td>$ 81881</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortized cost</td><td>100013</td><td>82329</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net unrealized loss pre-tax</td><td>$ -181 ( 181 )</td><td>$ -448 ( 448 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net unrealized loss after-tax</td><td>$ -113 ( 113 )</td><td>$ -270 ( 270 )</td></tr></table> the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity . these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci . refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 . the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization . we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists . to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component . the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security . our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors . such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance . to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income . given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s . housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance . as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices . generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears . as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current . overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough . the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate . in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above . the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations . our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses . ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security . in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s . residential mortgage-backed portfolio . we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above . this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults . to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated . excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .
Question: what was the fair value in 2011?
Answer: 99832.0
Question: and what was it in 2010?
| 81881.0 |
CONVFINQA_test775 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 99832</td><td>$ 81881</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortized cost</td><td>100013</td><td>82329</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net unrealized loss pre-tax</td><td>$ -181 ( 181 )</td><td>$ -448 ( 448 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net unrealized loss after-tax</td><td>$ -113 ( 113 )</td><td>$ -270 ( 270 )</td></tr></table> the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity . these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci . refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 . the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization . we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists . to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component . the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security . our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors . such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance . to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income . given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s . housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance . as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices . generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears . as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current . overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough . the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate . in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above . the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations . our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses . ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security . in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s . residential mortgage-backed portfolio . we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above . this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults . to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated . excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .
Question: what was the fair value in 2011?
Answer: 99832.0
Question: and what was it in 2010?
Answer: 81881.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| 17951.0 |
CONVFINQA_test776 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 99832</td><td>$ 81881</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortized cost</td><td>100013</td><td>82329</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net unrealized loss pre-tax</td><td>$ -181 ( 181 )</td><td>$ -448 ( 448 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net unrealized loss after-tax</td><td>$ -113 ( 113 )</td><td>$ -270 ( 270 )</td></tr></table> the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity . these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci . refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 . the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization . we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists . to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component . the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security . our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors . such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance . to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income . given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s . housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance . as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices . generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears . as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current . overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough . the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate . in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above . the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations . our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses . ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security . in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s . residential mortgage-backed portfolio . we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above . this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults . to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated . excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .
Question: what was the fair value in 2011?
Answer: 99832.0
Question: and what was it in 2010?
Answer: 81881.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 17951.0
Question: what was the fair value in 2010?
| 81881.0 |
CONVFINQA_test777 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
impairment the following table presents net unrealized losses on securities available for sale as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 99832</td><td>$ 81881</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortized cost</td><td>100013</td><td>82329</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net unrealized loss pre-tax</td><td>$ -181 ( 181 )</td><td>$ -448 ( 448 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net unrealized loss after-tax</td><td>$ -113 ( 113 )</td><td>$ -270 ( 270 )</td></tr></table> the net unrealized amounts presented above excluded the remaining net unrealized losses related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity . these unrealized losses related to reclassifications totaled $ 303 million , or $ 189 million after-tax , and $ 523 million , or $ 317 million after-tax , as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively , and were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income , or oci . refer to note 12 to the consolidated financial statements included under item 8 . the decline in these remaining after-tax unrealized losses related to reclassifications from december 31 , 2010 to december 31 , 2011 resulted primarily from amortization . we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists . to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component . the credit component is recorded in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recorded in oci to the extent that we do not intend to sell the security . our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation , more fully described in note 3 , of economic and security-specific factors . such factors are based on estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance . to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular , the credit component that would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income . given the exposure of our investment securities portfolio , particularly mortgage- and asset-backed securities , to residential mortgage and other consumer credit risks , the performance of the u.s . housing market is a significant driver of the portfolio 2019s credit performance . as such , our assessment of other-than-temporary impairment relies to a significant extent on our estimates of trends in national housing prices . generally , indices that measure trends in national housing prices are published in arrears . as of september 30 , 2011 , national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national home price index , had declined by approximately 31.3% ( 31.3 % ) peak-to-current . overall , management 2019s expectation , for purposes of its evaluation of other-than-temporary impairment as of december 31 , 2011 , was that housing prices would decline by approximately 35% ( 35 % ) peak-to-trough . the performance of certain mortgage products and vintages of securities continues to deteriorate . in addition , management continues to believe that housing prices will decline further as indicated above . the combination of these factors has led to an increase in management 2019s overall loss expectations . our investment portfolio continues to be sensitive to management 2019s estimates of future cumulative losses . ultimately , other-than- temporary impairment is based on specific cusip-level detailed analysis of the unique characteristics of each security . in addition , we perform sensitivity analysis across each significant product type within the non-agency u.s . residential mortgage-backed portfolio . we estimate , for example , that other-than-temporary impairment of the investment portfolio could increase by approximately $ 10 million to $ 50 million , if national housing prices were to decline by 37% ( 37 % ) to 39% ( 39 % ) peak-to-trough , compared to management 2019s expectation of 35% ( 35 % ) described above . this sensitivity estimate is based on a number of factors , including , but not limited to , the level of housing prices and the timing of defaults . to the extent that such factors differ substantially from management 2019s current expectations , resulting loss estimates may differ materially from those stated . excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded in 2011 , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining .
Question: what was the fair value in 2011?
Answer: 99832.0
Question: and what was it in 2010?
Answer: 81881.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: 17951.0
Question: what was the fair value in 2010?
Answer: 81881.0
Question: and how much does that change represent in relation to this 2010 fair value, in percentage?
| 0.21923 |
CONVFINQA_test778 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
impairment net unrealized losses on securities available for sale were as follows as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 72699</td><td>$ 54163</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortized cost</td><td>74843</td><td>60786</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net unrealized loss pre-tax</td><td>$ -2144 ( 2144 )</td><td>$ -6623 ( 6623 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net unrealized loss after-tax</td><td>$ -1316 ( 1316 )</td><td>$ -4057 ( 4057 )</td></tr></table> the above net unrealized loss amounts at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 excluded the remaining net unrealized loss of $ 1.01 billion , or $ 635 million after-tax , and $ 2.27 billion , or $ 1.39 billion after- tax , respectively , related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity . these after-tax amounts are recorded in other comprehensive income . the decline in the remaining after-tax unrealized loss amounts related to transferred securities resulted from amortization and from the recognition of losses from other-than-temporary impairment on certain of the securities . we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists . to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component . the credit component is recognized in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent that management does not intend to sell the security ( see note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8 ) . the assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation of economic and security- specific factors , which are more fully described in note 3 . such factors are based upon estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance . to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular the credit component that would be recognized in our consolidated statement of income . national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national hpi , have declined to date approximately 30% ( 30 % ) peak-to-current . management currently estimates that national housing prices will continue to decline and bottom out during the second half of 2010 , consistent with a peak-to-trough housing price decline of approximately 37% ( 37 % ) . as an indication of the sensitivity of our portfolio with respect to our more significant assumptions underlying our assessment of impairment , if we were to increase our default estimates to 110% ( 110 % ) of management 2019s current expectations with a corresponding slowing of prepayment speeds to 90% ( 90 % ) of management 2019s current expectations , credit-related other-than-temporary impairment could increase by approximately $ 120 million to $ 125 million , which impairment would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income . excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining securities and the resulting net unrealized losses to be temporary and not the result of any material changes in the credit characteristics of the securities . additional information about our assessment of impairment is provided in note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8. .
Question: what is the net change of securities between 2008 and 2009?
| 18536.0 |
CONVFINQA_test779 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
impairment net unrealized losses on securities available for sale were as follows as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 72699</td><td>$ 54163</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortized cost</td><td>74843</td><td>60786</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net unrealized loss pre-tax</td><td>$ -2144 ( 2144 )</td><td>$ -6623 ( 6623 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net unrealized loss after-tax</td><td>$ -1316 ( 1316 )</td><td>$ -4057 ( 4057 )</td></tr></table> the above net unrealized loss amounts at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 excluded the remaining net unrealized loss of $ 1.01 billion , or $ 635 million after-tax , and $ 2.27 billion , or $ 1.39 billion after- tax , respectively , related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity . these after-tax amounts are recorded in other comprehensive income . the decline in the remaining after-tax unrealized loss amounts related to transferred securities resulted from amortization and from the recognition of losses from other-than-temporary impairment on certain of the securities . we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists . to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component . the credit component is recognized in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent that management does not intend to sell the security ( see note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8 ) . the assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation of economic and security- specific factors , which are more fully described in note 3 . such factors are based upon estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance . to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular the credit component that would be recognized in our consolidated statement of income . national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national hpi , have declined to date approximately 30% ( 30 % ) peak-to-current . management currently estimates that national housing prices will continue to decline and bottom out during the second half of 2010 , consistent with a peak-to-trough housing price decline of approximately 37% ( 37 % ) . as an indication of the sensitivity of our portfolio with respect to our more significant assumptions underlying our assessment of impairment , if we were to increase our default estimates to 110% ( 110 % ) of management 2019s current expectations with a corresponding slowing of prepayment speeds to 90% ( 90 % ) of management 2019s current expectations , credit-related other-than-temporary impairment could increase by approximately $ 120 million to $ 125 million , which impairment would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income . excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining securities and the resulting net unrealized losses to be temporary and not the result of any material changes in the credit characteristics of the securities . additional information about our assessment of impairment is provided in note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8. .
Question: what is the net change of securities between 2008 and 2009?
Answer: 18536.0
Question: what is the fair value of securities in 2008?
| 54163.0 |
CONVFINQA_test780 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
impairment net unrealized losses on securities available for sale were as follows as of december 31: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( in millions )</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>fair value</td><td>$ 72699</td><td>$ 54163</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>amortized cost</td><td>74843</td><td>60786</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>net unrealized loss pre-tax</td><td>$ -2144 ( 2144 )</td><td>$ -6623 ( 6623 )</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>net unrealized loss after-tax</td><td>$ -1316 ( 1316 )</td><td>$ -4057 ( 4057 )</td></tr></table> the above net unrealized loss amounts at december 31 , 2009 and december 31 , 2008 excluded the remaining net unrealized loss of $ 1.01 billion , or $ 635 million after-tax , and $ 2.27 billion , or $ 1.39 billion after- tax , respectively , related to reclassifications of securities available for sale to securities held to maturity . these after-tax amounts are recorded in other comprehensive income . the decline in the remaining after-tax unrealized loss amounts related to transferred securities resulted from amortization and from the recognition of losses from other-than-temporary impairment on certain of the securities . we conduct periodic reviews of individual securities to assess whether other-than-temporary impairment exists . to the extent that other-than-temporary impairment is identified , the impairment is broken into a credit component and a non-credit component . the credit component is recognized in our consolidated statement of income , and the non-credit component is recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent that management does not intend to sell the security ( see note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8 ) . the assessment of other-than-temporary impairment involves an evaluation of economic and security- specific factors , which are more fully described in note 3 . such factors are based upon estimates , derived by management , which contemplate current market conditions and security-specific performance . to the extent that market conditions are worse than management 2019s expectations , other-than-temporary impairment could increase , in particular the credit component that would be recognized in our consolidated statement of income . national housing prices , according to the case-shiller national hpi , have declined to date approximately 30% ( 30 % ) peak-to-current . management currently estimates that national housing prices will continue to decline and bottom out during the second half of 2010 , consistent with a peak-to-trough housing price decline of approximately 37% ( 37 % ) . as an indication of the sensitivity of our portfolio with respect to our more significant assumptions underlying our assessment of impairment , if we were to increase our default estimates to 110% ( 110 % ) of management 2019s current expectations with a corresponding slowing of prepayment speeds to 90% ( 90 % ) of management 2019s current expectations , credit-related other-than-temporary impairment could increase by approximately $ 120 million to $ 125 million , which impairment would be recorded in our consolidated statement of income . excluding the securities for which other-than-temporary impairment was recorded , management considers the aggregate decline in fair value of the remaining securities and the resulting net unrealized losses to be temporary and not the result of any material changes in the credit characteristics of the securities . additional information about our assessment of impairment is provided in note 3 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included under item 8. .
Question: what is the net change of securities between 2008 and 2009?
Answer: 18536.0
Question: what is the fair value of securities in 2008?
Answer: 54163.0
Question: what percentage change does this represent?
| 0.34223 |
CONVFINQA_test781 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/01</td><td>12/31/02</td><td>12/31/03</td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 117.19</td><td>$ 140.49</td><td>$ 163.54</td><td>$ 146.35</td><td>$ 148.92</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 77.90</td><td>$ 100.24</td><td>$ 111.15</td><td>$ 116.61</td><td>$ 135.02</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 88.52</td><td>$ 116.70</td><td>$ 149.06</td><td>$ 166.42</td><td>$ 182.76</td></tr></table> securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .
Question: what was the return for united parcel service inc . in 2006?
| 148.92 |
CONVFINQA_test782 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/01</td><td>12/31/02</td><td>12/31/03</td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 117.19</td><td>$ 140.49</td><td>$ 163.54</td><td>$ 146.35</td><td>$ 148.92</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 77.90</td><td>$ 100.24</td><td>$ 111.15</td><td>$ 116.61</td><td>$ 135.02</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 88.52</td><td>$ 116.70</td><td>$ 149.06</td><td>$ 166.42</td><td>$ 182.76</td></tr></table> securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .
Question: what was the return for united parcel service inc . in 2006?
Answer: 148.92
Question: and what was the change in that return from 2001 to 2006?
| 48.92 |
CONVFINQA_test783 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2001 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 s&p 500 ups dj transport . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>12/31/01</td><td>12/31/02</td><td>12/31/03</td><td>12/31/04</td><td>12/31/05</td><td>12/31/06</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>united parcel service inc .</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 117.19</td><td>$ 140.49</td><td>$ 163.54</td><td>$ 146.35</td><td>$ 148.92</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>s&p 500 index</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 77.90</td><td>$ 100.24</td><td>$ 111.15</td><td>$ 116.61</td><td>$ 135.02</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>dow jones transportation average</td><td>$ 100.00</td><td>$ 88.52</td><td>$ 116.70</td><td>$ 149.06</td><td>$ 166.42</td><td>$ 182.76</td></tr></table> securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2006 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .
Question: what was the return for united parcel service inc . in 2006?
Answer: 148.92
Question: and what was the change in that return from 2001 to 2006?
Answer: 48.92
Question: how much, then, does that change represent in relation to the return of that stock in 2001, in percentage?
| 0.4892 |
CONVFINQA_test784 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
4 . stock options and other stock plans we have 100962 options outstanding under the 1993 stock option and retention stock plan of union pacific corporation ( 1993 plan ) . there are 7140 restricted shares outstanding under the 1992 restricted stock plan for non-employee directors of union pacific corporation . we no longer grant options or awards of retention shares and units under these plans . in april 2000 , the shareholders approved the union pacific corporation 2000 directors plan ( directors plan ) whereby 1100000 shares of our common stock were reserved for issuance to our non-employee directors . under the directors plan , each non-employee director , upon his or her initial election to the board of directors , receives a grant of 2000 shares of retention shares or retention stock units . prior to december 31 , 2007 , each non-employee director received annually an option to purchase at fair value a number of shares of our common stock , not to exceed 10000 shares during any calendar year , determined by dividing 60000 by 1/3 of the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the date of such board of directors meeting , with the resulting quotient rounded up or down to the nearest 50 shares . as of december 31 , 2009 , 18000 restricted shares were outstanding under the directors plan and 292000 options were outstanding under the directors plan . the union pacific corporation 2001 stock incentive plan ( 2001 plan ) was approved by the shareholders in april 2001 . the 2001 plan reserved 24000000 shares of our common stock for issuance to eligible employees of the corporation and its subsidiaries in the form of non-qualified options , incentive stock options , retention shares , stock units , and incentive bonus awards . non-employee directors were not eligible for awards under the 2001 plan . as of december 31 , 2009 , 3366230 options were outstanding under the 2001 plan . we no longer grant any stock options or other stock or unit awards under this plan . the union pacific corporation 2004 stock incentive plan ( 2004 plan ) was approved by shareholders in april 2004 . the 2004 plan reserved 42000000 shares of our common stock for issuance , plus any shares subject to awards made under the 2001 plan and the 1993 plan that were outstanding on april 16 , 2004 , and became available for regrant pursuant to the terms of the 2004 plan . under the 2004 plan , non- qualified options , stock appreciation rights , retention shares , stock units , and incentive bonus awards may be granted to eligible employees of the corporation and its subsidiaries . non-employee directors are not eligible for awards under the 2004 plan . as of december 31 , 2009 , 8939710 options and 3778997 retention shares and stock units were outstanding under the 2004 plan . pursuant to the above plans 33559150 ; 36961123 ; and 38601728 shares of our common stock were authorized and available for grant at december 31 , 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , respectively . stock options 2013 we estimate the fair value of our stock option awards using the black-scholes option pricing model . groups of employees and non-employee directors that have similar historical and expected exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . the table below shows the annual weighted-average assumptions used for valuation purposes : weighted-average assumptions 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>weighted-average assumptions</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.9% ( 1.9 % )</td><td>2.8% ( 2.8 % )</td><td>4.9% ( 4.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.3% ( 2.3 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>5.1</td><td>5.3</td><td>4.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>volatility</td><td>31.3% ( 31.3 % )</td><td>22.2% ( 22.2 % )</td><td>20.9% ( 20.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted</td><td>$ 11.33</td><td>$ 13.35</td><td>$ 11.19</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the assumed fmv of a share?
| 2000.0 |
CONVFINQA_test785 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
4 . stock options and other stock plans we have 100962 options outstanding under the 1993 stock option and retention stock plan of union pacific corporation ( 1993 plan ) . there are 7140 restricted shares outstanding under the 1992 restricted stock plan for non-employee directors of union pacific corporation . we no longer grant options or awards of retention shares and units under these plans . in april 2000 , the shareholders approved the union pacific corporation 2000 directors plan ( directors plan ) whereby 1100000 shares of our common stock were reserved for issuance to our non-employee directors . under the directors plan , each non-employee director , upon his or her initial election to the board of directors , receives a grant of 2000 shares of retention shares or retention stock units . prior to december 31 , 2007 , each non-employee director received annually an option to purchase at fair value a number of shares of our common stock , not to exceed 10000 shares during any calendar year , determined by dividing 60000 by 1/3 of the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the date of such board of directors meeting , with the resulting quotient rounded up or down to the nearest 50 shares . as of december 31 , 2009 , 18000 restricted shares were outstanding under the directors plan and 292000 options were outstanding under the directors plan . the union pacific corporation 2001 stock incentive plan ( 2001 plan ) was approved by the shareholders in april 2001 . the 2001 plan reserved 24000000 shares of our common stock for issuance to eligible employees of the corporation and its subsidiaries in the form of non-qualified options , incentive stock options , retention shares , stock units , and incentive bonus awards . non-employee directors were not eligible for awards under the 2001 plan . as of december 31 , 2009 , 3366230 options were outstanding under the 2001 plan . we no longer grant any stock options or other stock or unit awards under this plan . the union pacific corporation 2004 stock incentive plan ( 2004 plan ) was approved by shareholders in april 2004 . the 2004 plan reserved 42000000 shares of our common stock for issuance , plus any shares subject to awards made under the 2001 plan and the 1993 plan that were outstanding on april 16 , 2004 , and became available for regrant pursuant to the terms of the 2004 plan . under the 2004 plan , non- qualified options , stock appreciation rights , retention shares , stock units , and incentive bonus awards may be granted to eligible employees of the corporation and its subsidiaries . non-employee directors are not eligible for awards under the 2004 plan . as of december 31 , 2009 , 8939710 options and 3778997 retention shares and stock units were outstanding under the 2004 plan . pursuant to the above plans 33559150 ; 36961123 ; and 38601728 shares of our common stock were authorized and available for grant at december 31 , 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , respectively . stock options 2013 we estimate the fair value of our stock option awards using the black-scholes option pricing model . groups of employees and non-employee directors that have similar historical and expected exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . the table below shows the annual weighted-average assumptions used for valuation purposes : weighted-average assumptions 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>weighted-average assumptions</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.9% ( 1.9 % )</td><td>2.8% ( 2.8 % )</td><td>4.9% ( 4.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.3% ( 2.3 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>5.1</td><td>5.3</td><td>4.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>volatility</td><td>31.3% ( 31.3 % )</td><td>22.2% ( 22.2 % )</td><td>20.9% ( 20.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted</td><td>$ 11.33</td><td>$ 13.35</td><td>$ 11.19</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the assumed fmv of a share?
Answer: 2000.0
Question: under the pre-december 31 , 2007 plan what would have been the value correspondent to a third of that fmv?
| 666.66667 |
CONVFINQA_test786 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
4 . stock options and other stock plans we have 100962 options outstanding under the 1993 stock option and retention stock plan of union pacific corporation ( 1993 plan ) . there are 7140 restricted shares outstanding under the 1992 restricted stock plan for non-employee directors of union pacific corporation . we no longer grant options or awards of retention shares and units under these plans . in april 2000 , the shareholders approved the union pacific corporation 2000 directors plan ( directors plan ) whereby 1100000 shares of our common stock were reserved for issuance to our non-employee directors . under the directors plan , each non-employee director , upon his or her initial election to the board of directors , receives a grant of 2000 shares of retention shares or retention stock units . prior to december 31 , 2007 , each non-employee director received annually an option to purchase at fair value a number of shares of our common stock , not to exceed 10000 shares during any calendar year , determined by dividing 60000 by 1/3 of the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the date of such board of directors meeting , with the resulting quotient rounded up or down to the nearest 50 shares . as of december 31 , 2009 , 18000 restricted shares were outstanding under the directors plan and 292000 options were outstanding under the directors plan . the union pacific corporation 2001 stock incentive plan ( 2001 plan ) was approved by the shareholders in april 2001 . the 2001 plan reserved 24000000 shares of our common stock for issuance to eligible employees of the corporation and its subsidiaries in the form of non-qualified options , incentive stock options , retention shares , stock units , and incentive bonus awards . non-employee directors were not eligible for awards under the 2001 plan . as of december 31 , 2009 , 3366230 options were outstanding under the 2001 plan . we no longer grant any stock options or other stock or unit awards under this plan . the union pacific corporation 2004 stock incentive plan ( 2004 plan ) was approved by shareholders in april 2004 . the 2004 plan reserved 42000000 shares of our common stock for issuance , plus any shares subject to awards made under the 2001 plan and the 1993 plan that were outstanding on april 16 , 2004 , and became available for regrant pursuant to the terms of the 2004 plan . under the 2004 plan , non- qualified options , stock appreciation rights , retention shares , stock units , and incentive bonus awards may be granted to eligible employees of the corporation and its subsidiaries . non-employee directors are not eligible for awards under the 2004 plan . as of december 31 , 2009 , 8939710 options and 3778997 retention shares and stock units were outstanding under the 2004 plan . pursuant to the above plans 33559150 ; 36961123 ; and 38601728 shares of our common stock were authorized and available for grant at december 31 , 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , respectively . stock options 2013 we estimate the fair value of our stock option awards using the black-scholes option pricing model . groups of employees and non-employee directors that have similar historical and expected exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . the table below shows the annual weighted-average assumptions used for valuation purposes : weighted-average assumptions 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>weighted-average assumptions</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.9% ( 1.9 % )</td><td>2.8% ( 2.8 % )</td><td>4.9% ( 4.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.3% ( 2.3 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>5.1</td><td>5.3</td><td>4.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>volatility</td><td>31.3% ( 31.3 % )</td><td>22.2% ( 22.2 % )</td><td>20.9% ( 20.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted</td><td>$ 11.33</td><td>$ 13.35</td><td>$ 11.19</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the assumed fmv of a share?
Answer: 2000.0
Question: under the pre-december 31 , 2007 plan what would have been the value correspondent to a third of that fmv?
Answer: 666.66667
Question: in order to determine the number of shares that can be bought by each non-employee director, what would be the value that gets divided by this third of the fmv?
| 60000.0 |
CONVFINQA_test787 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
4 . stock options and other stock plans we have 100962 options outstanding under the 1993 stock option and retention stock plan of union pacific corporation ( 1993 plan ) . there are 7140 restricted shares outstanding under the 1992 restricted stock plan for non-employee directors of union pacific corporation . we no longer grant options or awards of retention shares and units under these plans . in april 2000 , the shareholders approved the union pacific corporation 2000 directors plan ( directors plan ) whereby 1100000 shares of our common stock were reserved for issuance to our non-employee directors . under the directors plan , each non-employee director , upon his or her initial election to the board of directors , receives a grant of 2000 shares of retention shares or retention stock units . prior to december 31 , 2007 , each non-employee director received annually an option to purchase at fair value a number of shares of our common stock , not to exceed 10000 shares during any calendar year , determined by dividing 60000 by 1/3 of the fair market value of one share of our common stock on the date of such board of directors meeting , with the resulting quotient rounded up or down to the nearest 50 shares . as of december 31 , 2009 , 18000 restricted shares were outstanding under the directors plan and 292000 options were outstanding under the directors plan . the union pacific corporation 2001 stock incentive plan ( 2001 plan ) was approved by the shareholders in april 2001 . the 2001 plan reserved 24000000 shares of our common stock for issuance to eligible employees of the corporation and its subsidiaries in the form of non-qualified options , incentive stock options , retention shares , stock units , and incentive bonus awards . non-employee directors were not eligible for awards under the 2001 plan . as of december 31 , 2009 , 3366230 options were outstanding under the 2001 plan . we no longer grant any stock options or other stock or unit awards under this plan . the union pacific corporation 2004 stock incentive plan ( 2004 plan ) was approved by shareholders in april 2004 . the 2004 plan reserved 42000000 shares of our common stock for issuance , plus any shares subject to awards made under the 2001 plan and the 1993 plan that were outstanding on april 16 , 2004 , and became available for regrant pursuant to the terms of the 2004 plan . under the 2004 plan , non- qualified options , stock appreciation rights , retention shares , stock units , and incentive bonus awards may be granted to eligible employees of the corporation and its subsidiaries . non-employee directors are not eligible for awards under the 2004 plan . as of december 31 , 2009 , 8939710 options and 3778997 retention shares and stock units were outstanding under the 2004 plan . pursuant to the above plans 33559150 ; 36961123 ; and 38601728 shares of our common stock were authorized and available for grant at december 31 , 2009 , 2008 , and 2007 , respectively . stock options 2013 we estimate the fair value of our stock option awards using the black-scholes option pricing model . groups of employees and non-employee directors that have similar historical and expected exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . the table below shows the annual weighted-average assumptions used for valuation purposes : weighted-average assumptions 2009 2008 2007 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>weighted-average assumptions</td><td>2009</td><td>2008</td><td>2007</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>risk-free interest rate</td><td>1.9% ( 1.9 % )</td><td>2.8% ( 2.8 % )</td><td>4.9% ( 4.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dividend yield</td><td>2.3% ( 2.3 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td><td>1.4% ( 1.4 % )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>expected life ( years )</td><td>5.1</td><td>5.3</td><td>4.7</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>volatility</td><td>31.3% ( 31.3 % )</td><td>22.2% ( 22.2 % )</td><td>20.9% ( 20.9 % )</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted</td><td>$ 11.33</td><td>$ 13.35</td><td>$ 11.19</td></tr></table> .
Question: what is the assumed fmv of a share?
Answer: 2000.0
Question: under the pre-december 31 , 2007 plan what would have been the value correspondent to a third of that fmv?
Answer: 666.66667
Question: in order to determine the number of shares that can be bought by each non-employee director, what would be the value that gets divided by this third of the fmv?
Answer: 60000.0
Question: and what would be, then, that number of shares that can be bought?
| 90.0 |
CONVFINQA_test788 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
contingent consideration of up to $ 13.8 million . the contingent consideration arrangement requires additional cash payments to the former equity holders of lyric upon the achievement of certain technological and product development milestones payable during the period from june 2011 through june 2016 . the company estimated the fair value of the contingent consideration arrangement utilizing the income approach . changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date primarily driven by assumptions pertaining to the achievement of the defined milestones will be recognized in operating income in the period of the estimated fair value change . as of october 29 , 2011 , no contingent payments have been made and the fair value of the contingent consideration was approximately $ 14.0 million . the company allocated the purchase price to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition , resulting in the recognition of $ 12.2 million of ipr&d , $ 18.9 million of goodwill and $ 3.3 million of net deferred tax liabilities . the goodwill recognized is attributable to future technologies that have yet to be determined as well as the assembled workforce of lyric . future technologies do not meet the criteria for recognition separately from goodwill because they are a part of future development and growth of the business . none of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . in addition , the company will be obligated to pay royalties to the former equity holders of lyric on revenue recognized from the sale of lyric products and licenses through the earlier of 20 years or the accrual of a maximum of $ 25 million . royalty payments to lyric employees require post-acquisition services to be rendered and , as such , the company will record these amounts as compensation expense in the related periods . as of october 29 , 2011 , no royalty payments have been made . the company recognized $ 0.2 million of acquisition-related costs that were expensed in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 . these costs are included in operating expenses in the consolidated statement of income . the company has not provided pro forma results of operations for integrant , audioasics and lyric herein as they were not material to the company on either an individual or an aggregate basis . the company included the results of operations of each acquisition in its consolidated statement of income from the date of such acquisition . 7 . deferred compensation plan investments investments in the analog devices , inc . deferred compensation plan ( the deferred compensation plan ) are classified as trading . the components of the investments as of october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>money market funds</td><td>$ 17187</td><td>$ 1840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>mutual funds</td><td>9223</td><td>6850</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total deferred compensation plan investments</td><td>$ 26410</td><td>$ 8690</td></tr></table> the fair values of these investments are based on published market quotes on october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 , respectively . adjustments to the fair value of , and income pertaining to , deferred compensation plan investments are recorded in operating expenses . gross realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading securities were not material in fiscal 2011 , 2010 or 2009 . the company has recorded a corresponding liability for amounts owed to the deferred compensation plan participants ( see note 10 ) . these investments are specifically designated as available to the company solely for the purpose of paying benefits under the deferred compensation plan . however , in the event the company became insolvent , the investments would be available to all unsecured general creditors . 8 . other investments other investments consist of equity securities and other long-term investments . investments are stated at fair value , which is based on market quotes or on a cost-basis , dependent on the nature of the investment , as appropriate . adjustments to the fair value of investments classified as available-for-sale are recorded as an increase or decrease analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the total deferred compensation plan investments in 2011?
| 26410.0 |
CONVFINQA_test789 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
contingent consideration of up to $ 13.8 million . the contingent consideration arrangement requires additional cash payments to the former equity holders of lyric upon the achievement of certain technological and product development milestones payable during the period from june 2011 through june 2016 . the company estimated the fair value of the contingent consideration arrangement utilizing the income approach . changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date primarily driven by assumptions pertaining to the achievement of the defined milestones will be recognized in operating income in the period of the estimated fair value change . as of october 29 , 2011 , no contingent payments have been made and the fair value of the contingent consideration was approximately $ 14.0 million . the company allocated the purchase price to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition , resulting in the recognition of $ 12.2 million of ipr&d , $ 18.9 million of goodwill and $ 3.3 million of net deferred tax liabilities . the goodwill recognized is attributable to future technologies that have yet to be determined as well as the assembled workforce of lyric . future technologies do not meet the criteria for recognition separately from goodwill because they are a part of future development and growth of the business . none of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . in addition , the company will be obligated to pay royalties to the former equity holders of lyric on revenue recognized from the sale of lyric products and licenses through the earlier of 20 years or the accrual of a maximum of $ 25 million . royalty payments to lyric employees require post-acquisition services to be rendered and , as such , the company will record these amounts as compensation expense in the related periods . as of october 29 , 2011 , no royalty payments have been made . the company recognized $ 0.2 million of acquisition-related costs that were expensed in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 . these costs are included in operating expenses in the consolidated statement of income . the company has not provided pro forma results of operations for integrant , audioasics and lyric herein as they were not material to the company on either an individual or an aggregate basis . the company included the results of operations of each acquisition in its consolidated statement of income from the date of such acquisition . 7 . deferred compensation plan investments investments in the analog devices , inc . deferred compensation plan ( the deferred compensation plan ) are classified as trading . the components of the investments as of october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>money market funds</td><td>$ 17187</td><td>$ 1840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>mutual funds</td><td>9223</td><td>6850</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total deferred compensation plan investments</td><td>$ 26410</td><td>$ 8690</td></tr></table> the fair values of these investments are based on published market quotes on october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 , respectively . adjustments to the fair value of , and income pertaining to , deferred compensation plan investments are recorded in operating expenses . gross realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading securities were not material in fiscal 2011 , 2010 or 2009 . the company has recorded a corresponding liability for amounts owed to the deferred compensation plan participants ( see note 10 ) . these investments are specifically designated as available to the company solely for the purpose of paying benefits under the deferred compensation plan . however , in the event the company became insolvent , the investments would be available to all unsecured general creditors . 8 . other investments other investments consist of equity securities and other long-term investments . investments are stated at fair value , which is based on market quotes or on a cost-basis , dependent on the nature of the investment , as appropriate . adjustments to the fair value of investments classified as available-for-sale are recorded as an increase or decrease analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the total deferred compensation plan investments in 2011?
Answer: 26410.0
Question: and in 2010?
| 8690.0 |
CONVFINQA_test790 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
contingent consideration of up to $ 13.8 million . the contingent consideration arrangement requires additional cash payments to the former equity holders of lyric upon the achievement of certain technological and product development milestones payable during the period from june 2011 through june 2016 . the company estimated the fair value of the contingent consideration arrangement utilizing the income approach . changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date primarily driven by assumptions pertaining to the achievement of the defined milestones will be recognized in operating income in the period of the estimated fair value change . as of october 29 , 2011 , no contingent payments have been made and the fair value of the contingent consideration was approximately $ 14.0 million . the company allocated the purchase price to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition , resulting in the recognition of $ 12.2 million of ipr&d , $ 18.9 million of goodwill and $ 3.3 million of net deferred tax liabilities . the goodwill recognized is attributable to future technologies that have yet to be determined as well as the assembled workforce of lyric . future technologies do not meet the criteria for recognition separately from goodwill because they are a part of future development and growth of the business . none of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . in addition , the company will be obligated to pay royalties to the former equity holders of lyric on revenue recognized from the sale of lyric products and licenses through the earlier of 20 years or the accrual of a maximum of $ 25 million . royalty payments to lyric employees require post-acquisition services to be rendered and , as such , the company will record these amounts as compensation expense in the related periods . as of october 29 , 2011 , no royalty payments have been made . the company recognized $ 0.2 million of acquisition-related costs that were expensed in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 . these costs are included in operating expenses in the consolidated statement of income . the company has not provided pro forma results of operations for integrant , audioasics and lyric herein as they were not material to the company on either an individual or an aggregate basis . the company included the results of operations of each acquisition in its consolidated statement of income from the date of such acquisition . 7 . deferred compensation plan investments investments in the analog devices , inc . deferred compensation plan ( the deferred compensation plan ) are classified as trading . the components of the investments as of october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>money market funds</td><td>$ 17187</td><td>$ 1840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>mutual funds</td><td>9223</td><td>6850</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total deferred compensation plan investments</td><td>$ 26410</td><td>$ 8690</td></tr></table> the fair values of these investments are based on published market quotes on october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 , respectively . adjustments to the fair value of , and income pertaining to , deferred compensation plan investments are recorded in operating expenses . gross realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading securities were not material in fiscal 2011 , 2010 or 2009 . the company has recorded a corresponding liability for amounts owed to the deferred compensation plan participants ( see note 10 ) . these investments are specifically designated as available to the company solely for the purpose of paying benefits under the deferred compensation plan . however , in the event the company became insolvent , the investments would be available to all unsecured general creditors . 8 . other investments other investments consist of equity securities and other long-term investments . investments are stated at fair value , which is based on market quotes or on a cost-basis , dependent on the nature of the investment , as appropriate . adjustments to the fair value of investments classified as available-for-sale are recorded as an increase or decrease analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the total deferred compensation plan investments in 2011?
Answer: 26410.0
Question: and in 2010?
Answer: 8690.0
Question: so what was the difference between these two values?
| 17720.0 |
CONVFINQA_test791 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
contingent consideration of up to $ 13.8 million . the contingent consideration arrangement requires additional cash payments to the former equity holders of lyric upon the achievement of certain technological and product development milestones payable during the period from june 2011 through june 2016 . the company estimated the fair value of the contingent consideration arrangement utilizing the income approach . changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration subsequent to the acquisition date primarily driven by assumptions pertaining to the achievement of the defined milestones will be recognized in operating income in the period of the estimated fair value change . as of october 29 , 2011 , no contingent payments have been made and the fair value of the contingent consideration was approximately $ 14.0 million . the company allocated the purchase price to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition , resulting in the recognition of $ 12.2 million of ipr&d , $ 18.9 million of goodwill and $ 3.3 million of net deferred tax liabilities . the goodwill recognized is attributable to future technologies that have yet to be determined as well as the assembled workforce of lyric . future technologies do not meet the criteria for recognition separately from goodwill because they are a part of future development and growth of the business . none of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes . in addition , the company will be obligated to pay royalties to the former equity holders of lyric on revenue recognized from the sale of lyric products and licenses through the earlier of 20 years or the accrual of a maximum of $ 25 million . royalty payments to lyric employees require post-acquisition services to be rendered and , as such , the company will record these amounts as compensation expense in the related periods . as of october 29 , 2011 , no royalty payments have been made . the company recognized $ 0.2 million of acquisition-related costs that were expensed in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 . these costs are included in operating expenses in the consolidated statement of income . the company has not provided pro forma results of operations for integrant , audioasics and lyric herein as they were not material to the company on either an individual or an aggregate basis . the company included the results of operations of each acquisition in its consolidated statement of income from the date of such acquisition . 7 . deferred compensation plan investments investments in the analog devices , inc . deferred compensation plan ( the deferred compensation plan ) are classified as trading . the components of the investments as of october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 were as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>-</td><td>2011</td><td>2010</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>money market funds</td><td>$ 17187</td><td>$ 1840</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>mutual funds</td><td>9223</td><td>6850</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>total deferred compensation plan investments</td><td>$ 26410</td><td>$ 8690</td></tr></table> the fair values of these investments are based on published market quotes on october 29 , 2011 and october 30 , 2010 , respectively . adjustments to the fair value of , and income pertaining to , deferred compensation plan investments are recorded in operating expenses . gross realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading securities were not material in fiscal 2011 , 2010 or 2009 . the company has recorded a corresponding liability for amounts owed to the deferred compensation plan participants ( see note 10 ) . these investments are specifically designated as available to the company solely for the purpose of paying benefits under the deferred compensation plan . however , in the event the company became insolvent , the investments would be available to all unsecured general creditors . 8 . other investments other investments consist of equity securities and other long-term investments . investments are stated at fair value , which is based on market quotes or on a cost-basis , dependent on the nature of the investment , as appropriate . adjustments to the fair value of investments classified as available-for-sale are recorded as an increase or decrease analog devices , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .
Question: what was the total deferred compensation plan investments in 2011?
Answer: 26410.0
Question: and in 2010?
Answer: 8690.0
Question: so what was the difference between these two values?
Answer: 17720.0
Question: and the percentage increase during this time?
| 2.03913 |
CONVFINQA_test792 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the analysis of our depreciation studies . changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively . under group depreciation , the historical cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized . the historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using ( i ) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and ( ii ) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies . the indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes . because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired , we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate . in addition , we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient ( or in excess ) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies . any deficiency ( or excess ) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets . for retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business , a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions : ( i ) is unusual , ( ii ) is material in amount , and ( iii ) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies . a gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations . when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use . however , many of our assets are self-constructed . a large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties , which is typically performed by our employees , and for track line expansion and other capacity projects . costs that are directly attributable to capital projects ( including overhead costs ) are capitalized . direct costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment . indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset . general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred . normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized . these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases . total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.4 billion for 2014 , $ 2.3 billion for 2013 , and $ 2.1 billion for 2012 . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 13 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2014 2013 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>dec . 31 2014</td><td>dec . 312013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>$ 877</td><td>$ 803</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dividends payable</td><td>438</td><td>356</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income and other taxes payable</td><td>412</td><td>491</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accrued wages and vacation</td><td>409</td><td>385</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accrued casualty costs</td><td>249</td><td>207</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>interest payable</td><td>178</td><td>169</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>equipment rents payable</td><td>100</td><td>96</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>640</td><td>579</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities</td><td>$ 3303</td><td>$ 3086</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the difference in the total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred between 2013 and 2014?
| 0.1 |
CONVFINQA_test793 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the analysis of our depreciation studies . changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively . under group depreciation , the historical cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized . the historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using ( i ) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and ( ii ) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies . the indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes . because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired , we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate . in addition , we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient ( or in excess ) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies . any deficiency ( or excess ) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets . for retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business , a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions : ( i ) is unusual , ( ii ) is material in amount , and ( iii ) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies . a gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations . when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use . however , many of our assets are self-constructed . a large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties , which is typically performed by our employees , and for track line expansion and other capacity projects . costs that are directly attributable to capital projects ( including overhead costs ) are capitalized . direct costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment . indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset . general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred . normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized . these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases . total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.4 billion for 2014 , $ 2.3 billion for 2013 , and $ 2.1 billion for 2012 . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 13 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2014 2013 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>dec . 31 2014</td><td>dec . 312013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>$ 877</td><td>$ 803</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dividends payable</td><td>438</td><td>356</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income and other taxes payable</td><td>412</td><td>491</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accrued wages and vacation</td><td>409</td><td>385</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accrued casualty costs</td><td>249</td><td>207</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>interest payable</td><td>178</td><td>169</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>equipment rents payable</td><td>100</td><td>96</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>640</td><td>579</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities</td><td>$ 3303</td><td>$ 3086</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the difference in the total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred between 2013 and 2014?
Answer: 0.1
Question: and the value for 2013 again?
| 2.3 |
CONVFINQA_test794 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the analysis of our depreciation studies . changes in the estimated service lives of our assets and their related depreciation rates are implemented prospectively . under group depreciation , the historical cost ( net of salvage ) of depreciable property that is retired or replaced in the ordinary course of business is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized . the historical cost of certain track assets is estimated using ( i ) inflation indices published by the bureau of labor statistics and ( ii ) the estimated useful lives of the assets as determined by our depreciation studies . the indices were selected because they closely correlate with the major costs of the properties comprising the applicable track asset classes . because of the number of estimates inherent in the depreciation and retirement processes and because it is impossible to precisely estimate each of these variables until a group of property is completely retired , we continually monitor the estimated service lives of our assets and the accumulated depreciation associated with each asset class to ensure our depreciation rates are appropriate . in addition , we determine if the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation is deficient ( or in excess ) of the amount indicated by our depreciation studies . any deficiency ( or excess ) is amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining service lives of the applicable classes of assets . for retirements of depreciable railroad properties that do not occur in the normal course of business , a gain or loss may be recognized if the retirement meets each of the following three conditions : ( i ) is unusual , ( ii ) is material in amount , and ( iii ) varies significantly from the retirement profile identified through our depreciation studies . a gain or loss is recognized in other income when we sell land or dispose of assets that are not part of our railroad operations . when we purchase an asset , we capitalize all costs necessary to make the asset ready for its intended use . however , many of our assets are self-constructed . a large portion of our capital expenditures is for replacement of existing track assets and other road properties , which is typically performed by our employees , and for track line expansion and other capacity projects . costs that are directly attributable to capital projects ( including overhead costs ) are capitalized . direct costs that are capitalized as part of self- constructed assets include material , labor , and work equipment . indirect costs are capitalized if they clearly relate to the construction of the asset . general and administrative expenditures are expensed as incurred . normal repairs and maintenance are also expensed as incurred , while costs incurred that extend the useful life of an asset , improve the safety of our operations or improve operating efficiency are capitalized . these costs are allocated using appropriate statistical bases . total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred was $ 2.4 billion for 2014 , $ 2.3 billion for 2013 , and $ 2.1 billion for 2012 . assets held under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the net present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the leased asset at the inception of the lease . amortization expense is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the period of the related lease . 13 . accounts payable and other current liabilities dec . 31 , dec . 31 , millions 2014 2013 . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>millions</td><td>dec . 31 2014</td><td>dec . 312013</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>accounts payable</td><td>$ 877</td><td>$ 803</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>dividends payable</td><td>438</td><td>356</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>income and other taxes payable</td><td>412</td><td>491</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>accrued wages and vacation</td><td>409</td><td>385</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>accrued casualty costs</td><td>249</td><td>207</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>interest payable</td><td>178</td><td>169</td></tr><tr><td>8</td><td>equipment rents payable</td><td>100</td><td>96</td></tr><tr><td>9</td><td>other</td><td>640</td><td>579</td></tr><tr><td>10</td><td>total accounts payable and othercurrent liabilities</td><td>$ 3303</td><td>$ 3086</td></tr></table> .
Question: what was the difference in the total expense for repairs and maintenance incurred between 2013 and 2014?
Answer: 0.1
Question: and the value for 2013 again?
Answer: 2.3
Question: so what is the percentage change during this time?
| 0.04348 |
CONVFINQA_test795 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $ 1.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 . the amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 . these items have been classified appropriately in trading account assets or trading account liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of these items are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . other items for which the fair-value option was selected in accordance with sfas 159 the company has elected the fair-value option for the following eligible items , which did not affect opening retained earnings : 2022 certain credit products ; 2022 certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity-method investments ; 2022 certain structured liabilities ; 2022 certain non-structured liabilities ; and 2022 certain mortgage loans certain credit products citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain originated and purchased loans , including certain unfunded loan products , such as guarantees and letters of credit , executed by citigroup 2019s trading businesses . none of these credit products is a highly leveraged financing commitment . significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term , or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party . citigroup has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the company , including where those management objectives would not be met . the following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2008 trading assets</td><td>2008 loans</td><td>2008 trading assets</td><td>loans</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 16254</td><td>$ 2315</td><td>$ 26020</td><td>$ 3038</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value</td><td>$ 6501</td><td>$ 3</td><td>$ 899</td><td>$ -5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 1113</td><td>$ 186</td><td>$ 1292</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue</td><td>$ 190</td><td>$ -4 ( 4 )</td><td>$ 68</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> in millions of dollars trading assets loans trading assets loans carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 16254 $ 2315 $ 26020 $ 3038 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value $ 6501 $ 3 $ 899 $ ( 5 ) balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 77 $ 1113 $ 186 $ 1292 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 190 $ ( 4 ) $ 68 $ 2014 in addition to the amounts reported above , $ 72 million and $ 141 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair-value accounting were outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively . changes in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loans depending on their balance sheet classifications . the changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 38 million and $ 188 million , respectively . certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation . the company has elected the fair-value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in our investment companies , which are reported at fair value . the fair-value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments . as required by sfas 159 , all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value . these investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . citigroup also holds various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds that previously were required to be accounted for under the equity method . the company elected fair-value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity . since the funds account for all of their underlying assets at fair value , the impact of applying the equity method to citigroup 2019s investment in these funds was equivalent to fair-value accounting . thus , this fair-value election had no impact on opening retained earnings . these investments are classified as other assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . certain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates , inflation or currency risks ( 201cstructured liabilities 201d ) . the company elected the fair- value option , because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis . these positions will continue to be classified as debt , deposits or derivatives ( trading account liabilities ) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form . for those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 277 million as of december 31 , 2008 and $ 7 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ( 201cnon-structured liabilities 201d ) . .
Question: what was the carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet trading assets in 2008?
| 16254.0 |
CONVFINQA_test796 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $ 1.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 . the amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 . these items have been classified appropriately in trading account assets or trading account liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of these items are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . other items for which the fair-value option was selected in accordance with sfas 159 the company has elected the fair-value option for the following eligible items , which did not affect opening retained earnings : 2022 certain credit products ; 2022 certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity-method investments ; 2022 certain structured liabilities ; 2022 certain non-structured liabilities ; and 2022 certain mortgage loans certain credit products citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain originated and purchased loans , including certain unfunded loan products , such as guarantees and letters of credit , executed by citigroup 2019s trading businesses . none of these credit products is a highly leveraged financing commitment . significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term , or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party . citigroup has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the company , including where those management objectives would not be met . the following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2008 trading assets</td><td>2008 loans</td><td>2008 trading assets</td><td>loans</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 16254</td><td>$ 2315</td><td>$ 26020</td><td>$ 3038</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value</td><td>$ 6501</td><td>$ 3</td><td>$ 899</td><td>$ -5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 1113</td><td>$ 186</td><td>$ 1292</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue</td><td>$ 190</td><td>$ -4 ( 4 )</td><td>$ 68</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> in millions of dollars trading assets loans trading assets loans carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 16254 $ 2315 $ 26020 $ 3038 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value $ 6501 $ 3 $ 899 $ ( 5 ) balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 77 $ 1113 $ 186 $ 1292 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 190 $ ( 4 ) $ 68 $ 2014 in addition to the amounts reported above , $ 72 million and $ 141 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair-value accounting were outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively . changes in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loans depending on their balance sheet classifications . the changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 38 million and $ 188 million , respectively . certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation . the company has elected the fair-value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in our investment companies , which are reported at fair value . the fair-value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments . as required by sfas 159 , all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value . these investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . citigroup also holds various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds that previously were required to be accounted for under the equity method . the company elected fair-value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity . since the funds account for all of their underlying assets at fair value , the impact of applying the equity method to citigroup 2019s investment in these funds was equivalent to fair-value accounting . thus , this fair-value election had no impact on opening retained earnings . these investments are classified as other assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . certain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates , inflation or currency risks ( 201cstructured liabilities 201d ) . the company elected the fair- value option , because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis . these positions will continue to be classified as debt , deposits or derivatives ( trading account liabilities ) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form . for those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 277 million as of december 31 , 2008 and $ 7 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ( 201cnon-structured liabilities 201d ) . .
Question: what was the carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet trading assets in 2008?
Answer: 16254.0
Question: and what was it in 2007?
| 26020.0 |
CONVFINQA_test797 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $ 1.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 . the amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 . these items have been classified appropriately in trading account assets or trading account liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of these items are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . other items for which the fair-value option was selected in accordance with sfas 159 the company has elected the fair-value option for the following eligible items , which did not affect opening retained earnings : 2022 certain credit products ; 2022 certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity-method investments ; 2022 certain structured liabilities ; 2022 certain non-structured liabilities ; and 2022 certain mortgage loans certain credit products citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain originated and purchased loans , including certain unfunded loan products , such as guarantees and letters of credit , executed by citigroup 2019s trading businesses . none of these credit products is a highly leveraged financing commitment . significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term , or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party . citigroup has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the company , including where those management objectives would not be met . the following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2008 trading assets</td><td>2008 loans</td><td>2008 trading assets</td><td>loans</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 16254</td><td>$ 2315</td><td>$ 26020</td><td>$ 3038</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value</td><td>$ 6501</td><td>$ 3</td><td>$ 899</td><td>$ -5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 1113</td><td>$ 186</td><td>$ 1292</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue</td><td>$ 190</td><td>$ -4 ( 4 )</td><td>$ 68</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> in millions of dollars trading assets loans trading assets loans carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 16254 $ 2315 $ 26020 $ 3038 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value $ 6501 $ 3 $ 899 $ ( 5 ) balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 77 $ 1113 $ 186 $ 1292 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 190 $ ( 4 ) $ 68 $ 2014 in addition to the amounts reported above , $ 72 million and $ 141 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair-value accounting were outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively . changes in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loans depending on their balance sheet classifications . the changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 38 million and $ 188 million , respectively . certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation . the company has elected the fair-value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in our investment companies , which are reported at fair value . the fair-value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments . as required by sfas 159 , all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value . these investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . citigroup also holds various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds that previously were required to be accounted for under the equity method . the company elected fair-value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity . since the funds account for all of their underlying assets at fair value , the impact of applying the equity method to citigroup 2019s investment in these funds was equivalent to fair-value accounting . thus , this fair-value election had no impact on opening retained earnings . these investments are classified as other assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . certain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates , inflation or currency risks ( 201cstructured liabilities 201d ) . the company elected the fair- value option , because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis . these positions will continue to be classified as debt , deposits or derivatives ( trading account liabilities ) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form . for those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 277 million as of december 31 , 2008 and $ 7 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ( 201cnon-structured liabilities 201d ) . .
Question: what was the carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet trading assets in 2008?
Answer: 16254.0
Question: and what was it in 2007?
Answer: 26020.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
| -9766.0 |
CONVFINQA_test798 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
the notional amount of these unfunded letters of credit was $ 1.4 billion as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 . the amount funded was insignificant with no amounts 90 days or more past due or on a non-accrual status at december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 . these items have been classified appropriately in trading account assets or trading account liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet . changes in fair value of these items are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . other items for which the fair-value option was selected in accordance with sfas 159 the company has elected the fair-value option for the following eligible items , which did not affect opening retained earnings : 2022 certain credit products ; 2022 certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity-method investments ; 2022 certain structured liabilities ; 2022 certain non-structured liabilities ; and 2022 certain mortgage loans certain credit products citigroup has elected the fair-value option for certain originated and purchased loans , including certain unfunded loan products , such as guarantees and letters of credit , executed by citigroup 2019s trading businesses . none of these credit products is a highly leveraged financing commitment . significant groups of transactions include loans and unfunded loan products that are expected to be either sold or securitized in the near term , or transactions where the economic risks are hedged with derivative instruments such as purchased credit default swaps or total return swaps where the company pays the total return on the underlying loans to a third party . citigroup has elected the fair-value option to mitigate accounting mismatches in cases where hedge accounting is complex and to achieve operational simplifications . fair value was not elected for most lending transactions across the company , including where those management objectives would not be met . the following table provides information about certain credit products carried at fair value: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>in millions of dollars</td><td>2008 trading assets</td><td>2008 loans</td><td>2008 trading assets</td><td>loans</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet</td><td>$ 16254</td><td>$ 2315</td><td>$ 26020</td><td>$ 3038</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value</td><td>$ 6501</td><td>$ 3</td><td>$ 899</td><td>$ -5 ( 5 )</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due</td><td>$ 77</td><td>$ 1113</td><td>$ 186</td><td>$ 1292</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days pastdue</td><td>$ 190</td><td>$ -4 ( 4 )</td><td>$ 68</td><td>$ 2014</td></tr></table> in millions of dollars trading assets loans trading assets loans carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet $ 16254 $ 2315 $ 26020 $ 3038 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value $ 6501 $ 3 $ 899 $ ( 5 ) balance on non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 77 $ 1113 $ 186 $ 1292 aggregate unpaid principal balance in excess of fair value for non-accrual loans or loans more than 90 days past due $ 190 $ ( 4 ) $ 68 $ 2014 in addition to the amounts reported above , $ 72 million and $ 141 million of unfunded loan commitments related to certain credit products selected for fair-value accounting were outstanding as of december 31 , 2008 and december 31 , 2007 , respectively . changes in fair value of funded and unfunded credit products are classified in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest revenue is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as interest revenue on trading account assets or loans depending on their balance sheet classifications . the changes in fair value for the years ended december 31 , 2008 and 2007 due to instrument-specific credit risk totaled to a loss of $ 38 million and $ 188 million , respectively . certain investments in private equity and real estate ventures and certain equity method investments citigroup invests in private equity and real estate ventures for the purpose of earning investment returns and for capital appreciation . the company has elected the fair-value option for certain of these ventures , because such investments are considered similar to many private equity or hedge fund activities in our investment companies , which are reported at fair value . the fair-value option brings consistency in the accounting and evaluation of certain of these investments . as required by sfas 159 , all investments ( debt and equity ) in such private equity and real estate entities are accounted for at fair value . these investments are classified as investments on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . citigroup also holds various non-strategic investments in leveraged buyout funds and other hedge funds that previously were required to be accounted for under the equity method . the company elected fair-value accounting to reduce operational and accounting complexity . since the funds account for all of their underlying assets at fair value , the impact of applying the equity method to citigroup 2019s investment in these funds was equivalent to fair-value accounting . thus , this fair-value election had no impact on opening retained earnings . these investments are classified as other assets on citigroup 2019s consolidated balance sheet . changes in the fair values of these investments are classified in other revenue in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . certain structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain structured liabilities whose performance is linked to structured interest rates , inflation or currency risks ( 201cstructured liabilities 201d ) . the company elected the fair- value option , because these exposures are considered to be trading-related positions and , therefore , are managed on a fair-value basis . these positions will continue to be classified as debt , deposits or derivatives ( trading account liabilities ) on the company 2019s consolidated balance sheet according to their legal form . for those structured liabilities classified as long-term debt for which the fair-value option has been elected , the aggregate unpaid principal balance exceeds the aggregate fair value of such instruments by $ 277 million as of december 31 , 2008 and $ 7 million as of december 31 , 2007 . the change in fair value for these structured liabilities is reported in principal transactions in the company 2019s consolidated statement of income . related interest expense is measured based on the contractual interest rates and reported as such in the consolidated income statement . certain non-structured liabilities the company has elected the fair-value option for certain non-structured liabilities with fixed and floating interest rates ( 201cnon-structured liabilities 201d ) . .
Question: what was the carrying amount reported on the consolidated balance sheet trading assets in 2008?
Answer: 16254.0
Question: and what was it in 2007?
Answer: 26020.0
Question: what was, then, the change over the year?
Answer: -9766.0
Question: and how much does this change represent in relation to the 2007 carrying amount, in percentage?
| -0.37533 |
CONVFINQA_test799 | Read the following texts and table with financial data from an S&P 500 earnings report carefully.Based on the question-answer history (if provided), answer the last question. The answer may require mathematical calculation based on the data provided.
64 | 2017 form 10-k notes to consolidated financial statements 1 . operations and summary of significant accounting policies a . nature of operations information in our financial statements and related commentary are presented in the following categories : machinery , energy & transportation ( me&t ) 2013 represents the aggregate total of construction industries , resource industries , energy & transportation and all other operating segments and related corporate items and eliminations . financial products 2013 primarily includes the company 2019s financial products segment . this category includes caterpillar financial services corporation ( cat financial ) , caterpillar insurance holdings inc . ( insurance services ) and their respective subsidiaries . our products are sold primarily under the brands 201ccaterpillar , 201d 201ccat , 201d design versions of 201ccat 201d and 201ccaterpillar , 201d 201cemd , 201d 201cfg wilson , 201d 201cmak , 201d 201cmwm , 201d 201cperkins , 201d 201cprogress rail , 201d 201csem 201d and 201csolar turbines 201d . we conduct operations in our machinery , energy & transportation lines of business under highly competitive conditions , including intense price competition . we place great emphasis on the high quality and performance of our products and our dealers 2019 service support . although no one competitor is believed to produce all of the same types of equipment that we do , there are numerous companies , large and small , which compete with us in the sale of each of our products . our machines are distributed principally through a worldwide organization of dealers ( dealer network ) , 48 located in the united states and 123 located outside the united states , serving 192 countries . reciprocating engines are sold principally through the dealer network and to other manufacturers for use in products . some of the reciprocating engines manufactured by our subsidiary perkins engines company limited , are also sold through its worldwide network of 93 distributors covering 182 countries . the fg wilson branded electric power generation systems primarily manufactured by our subsidiary caterpillar northern ireland limited are sold through its worldwide network of 154 distributors covering 131 countries . some of the large , medium speed reciprocating engines are also sold a0 under the mak brand through a worldwide network of 20 distributors covering 130 countries . our dealers do not deal exclusively with our products ; however , in most cases sales and servicing of our products are the dealers 2019 principal business . some products , primarily turbines and locomotives , are sold directly to end customers through sales forces employed by the company . at times , these employees are assisted by independent sales representatives . the financial products line of business also conducts operations under highly competitive conditions . financing for users of caterpillar products is available through a variety of competitive sources , principally commercial banks and finance and leasing companies . we offer various financing plans designed to increase the opportunity for sales of our products and generate financing income for our company . a significant portion of financial products activity is conducted in north america , with additional offices in latin america , asia/pacific , europe , africa and middle east . b . basis of presentation the consolidated financial statements include the accounts of caterpillar a0 inc . and its subsidiaries where we have a controlling financial interest . investments in companies where our ownership exceeds 20 percent and we do not have a controlling interest or where the ownership is less than 20 percent and for which we have a significant influence are accounted for by the equity method . see note 9 for further discussion . we consolidate all variable interest entities ( vies ) where caterpillar inc . is the primary beneficiary . for vies , we assess whether we are the primary beneficiary as prescribed by the accounting guidance on the consolidation of vies . the primary beneficiary of a vie is the party that has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity 2019s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the vie . see note 21 for further discussion on a consolidated vie . we have affiliates , suppliers and dealers that are vies of which we are not the primary beneficiary . although we have provided financial support , we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of each entity . our maximum exposure to loss from vies for which we are not the primary beneficiary was as follows: . <table class='wikitable'><tr><td>1</td><td>( millions of dollars )</td><td>december 31 , 2017</td><td>december 31 , 2016</td></tr><tr><td>2</td><td>receivables - trade and other</td><td>$ 34</td><td>$ 55</td></tr><tr><td>3</td><td>receivables - finance</td><td>42</td><td>174</td></tr><tr><td>4</td><td>long-term receivables - finance</td><td>38</td><td>246</td></tr><tr><td>5</td><td>investments in unconsolidated affiliated companies</td><td>39</td><td>31</td></tr><tr><td>6</td><td>guarantees</td><td>259</td><td>210</td></tr><tr><td>7</td><td>total</td><td>$ 412</td><td>$ 716</td></tr></table> in addition , cat financial has end-user customers that are vies of which we are not the primary beneficiary . although we have provided financial support to these entities and therefore have a variable interest , we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact their economic performance . our maximum exposure to loss from our involvement with these vies is limited to the credit risk inherently present in the financial support that we have provided . these risks are evaluated and reflected in our financial statements as part of our overall portfolio of finance receivables and related allowance for credit losses. .
Question: what is the net change in total maximum exposure to loss fro vies from 2016 to 2017?
| -304.0 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.